MLP2006-00003 a
NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION
„
MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2006-00003 =���:
SCHENK PARTITION ' @ �=
� :
120 DAYS = 7/13/2007
SECTION I. APPLICATION SLTMMARY
FILE NAME: SCHENK PARTITION
CASE NOS: Minor Land Partition(MLP) MLP2006-00003
Adjustment (VAR) VAR2006-00085
PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Minor Land Partition approval to partition a 34,958-square foot lot
into three lots of 8,188 square feet, 7,860 square feet and 8,514 square feet for single-family
homes. The site is currently vacant. The applicant is also requesting approval for an
Adjustment to the access spacing standard for private streets on a collector. However, an
adjustment is not required because SW North Dakota Street is a neighborhood route.
APPLICANTS: Daniel Schenk&Marilyn Ada.ir OWNER Daniel Schenk Living Trust
7115 SW Virginia Avenue 7115 SW Vi a n;a Avenue
Portland,OR 97219 Portland,OR 97219
ZONING
DESIGNATION: R 4.5: Low Densit� Residential. The R 4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate
detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a muiunum lot size
of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are perniitted conditionally.
Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally.
LOCATION: 9175 SW North Dakota Street;Washington County Tax Map 1S135DB,Tax Lot 8400.
PROPOSED PARCEL 1: 8,188 Square Feet
PROPOSED PARCEL 2: 7,860 Square Feet
PROPOSED PARCEL 3: 8,514 Square Feet
APPLICABLE
RE VIE W
��ITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.745,
18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
SECTION II. DECISION -
Notice is hereby given that the City of T"igard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the
above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in
Section V.
NOTTCE OF DEQSION MLI'2006-00003/SC:E-IENK PAR7TTTON PAGE 1 OF 23
�
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY
ONSITE IMPROVEMENTS, INQ,UDING DEMOLITION, GRADING, EXCAVATION AND/OR
FILL ACI'IVITIES:
e app cant s prepare a cover etter an su rrut it, a on wi any suppoxtin ocuments an orp ans
that address the following requirements to the CURRENT �ANNING DIVISI�N, ATTN: EMILY ENG
(503) 718-2712. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found:
1. Prior to site work, the applicant shall provide a new service provider letter from CWS. The boundary of the
proposed vegetative bufter does not match the boundaries approved by CWS in the service provider letter
dated May 1, 2006 (SPL# OS-005130�. Therefore, the applicant shall submit a current srte plan to CWS and
receive approval of the proposed buf er. If the buffer needs to be revised, all lots must meet the m;n;mum lot
size of the zone (7,500 S�. Otherwise,this partition approval will be void.
2. Prior to site work, the app licant shall revise the tree removal protection and mitigation plan to show tree
protection fencing. This plan shall be included with submittals �or the pubhc facilities unprovement pernzit and
with subrruttals for building pemuts.
3. Prior to site work, the proJ'ect arborist shall submit a tree protection program definuig standards and methods
that will be used on site d�uin�and after consuuction by the applicant and anyone wor�ng on site. These
standards shall be included on e tree removal,protection and rrutig ation plan. In addition, a copy of the tree
protection plan shall be included with the submittals for the Public Facilities Improvement Pernzit and building
perrruts.
4. Prior to site work, the applicant shall submit a tree mitigation plan if choosing to lant any mitigation trees.
The applicant may plant trees onsite,offsite,and/or pay a fee-in heu at the rate of$�25 er caliper uich. If the
applicant chooses not to plant anyrrutigation trees,the applicant shall paythe fee for all �5.5 inches ($1,937.50).
An��ytree riutigation plan must be approved by Gu-rent Plannuzg. Only trees spa_ced 20 feet on center or greater
will be counted towards miugation unless otherwise�ap proved b}l the City. The trees must have enoug.h so�l
volume and growing space to allow them to reach iuil matunty without becoming a nwsance or a danger to
surrounding suuctiu-es, utiliues hardscape, etc. Unless otherwrse approved by the City, only two rrutigation
trees maybe planted in a single�backyard and onlyone tree per front yard.
5. Prior to any site work the ap plicant shall install all proposed tree protection fencing. The fencing shall be
ins pected and approved by Cucrent Plannuzg prior to commencing any site work The tree protection fencing
shall remain in pIace through the duration of all of the building construction phases until the final inspection
has been passed
<If the Builder is dif�erent from the developer or initial applicant:>
Prior to issuance of bwlding permits the apphcant shall subrrut site plan drawings indicating the location of the
trees that were preserved on the lot c�uring site development,location of tree protectson fencing, and a signature
of approval from the proJ'e_-ct arborist regarduig the placement and construction techruques to be employed in
builcling the structures. All proposed protection fencing shall be installed and inspected prior to commencing
construcuon. The fencu' �shall remain in place through the durauon of all of the 6uilding construction phases,
until the final inspection Fias been passed. After approval from Cturent Planning,the tree protection measures
may be removed.
6. The Project Arborist shall submit written reports to Current Planrung at least once every two weeks, from
initial tree protection zone ('I'PZ) fencing installation, through the building construction phases, as he/she
monitors the construction acuvit�es and progress. T�us inspection will be to evaluate the tree protection
f encin ,deterniine if the f encing was moved at any point during construction, and deterniine if any part of the
Tree �rotection Plan has been violated. These reports must be provided to Ciurent Plaruiing unt�l the final
inspection. The reports shall include any changes that occurred to the TPZ as well as the condition and
location of the tree protection fencing. If the amount of TPZ was reduced then the Project Arborist shall
justify why the fencing was moved, and shall certify that the constiuction activities to the trees did not
advexsely unpact the overall,long-term health and stab�lity of the tree(s).
If the r�eports are not submitted or received by Ci.urent Plaiuling at the scheduled interva]s, and if it appears
the TPZ's or the Tree Protection Plan are not being followed by the contractor or a sub-contractor, the City
can stop work on the project until an inspection can be done by C�urrent Planning and the Project Arborist.
NOTIC�OF DEQSION MLP2006-00003/SQ�ENK PARTTTION PAGE 2 OF 23
7. Prior to site work, the ap licant shall submit security in the form of cash or other means acceptable to the City
for the e qu.ivalent value o�tree rrntigauon required at$125.00 per caliper inch. If additional rruugation trees are
preserved throu�h the partition improvements and construction of houses, and are properl protected through
these stages by the same measures afforded to other protected trees on site, the amount o�the cash assurance
may be correspondingly reduced. Anytrees planted on the site or off site in accordance with 18.790.060.D will
be credited against the assurance for two years following final plat approval. After such time,the applicant shall
pay the rema�n,pg value of.the assurance as a fee in-heu of planting. Any planting by the applicant must be
approved by Cxurent Plaiuung.
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT:
e app cant s pre�are a cover etter an su rrut it, a ong wi any suppomng ocuments an orp ans
that address the following requirements to the CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION, ATTN: EMILY ENG
(503) 718-2712. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found:
S. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall indicate all street trees (on the street and utility
improvement plans) alon the pn_vate street and frontage on SW North Dakota Street. Trees shall be chosen
from the C.�t}�s street tree�t. The.applicant shall include the trees'size and species. Size and spacing of street
trees shall be as stated in Code Secuon 18.745.040.C.2.
The a plicant shall pre are a cover letter and submit it, alon with any su ortin� gdocuments and/or plans
that address the }ollowing requirements to the ENG�EERING �EPARTMENT, ATTN: HIM
MCMILLAN 503-639-4171, EXT 2642. The cover letter shall cleariy identify where in the submittal the
required information is found:
9. A Public Facility Improvement (PFI) pernut is required for this roject to cover half-street improvements,
public utilities and any other work in the public right-of-way. Six(�sets of detailed public improvement plans
shall be submitted for review to the Engineenng Department. NOTE: these plans are u7 addit�on to any
drawin s required by the Ruild' Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements.
Public�acility Improvement (PF� pernut plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design
Standards,which are available at CatyHall and the Cat�s web page (www.ugard-or.gov).
10. The PFI pemut plan submittal shall include the e�ct legal name, address and tele�phone number of the
individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permittee", and who wiIl provide the financial
assurance for the public improvements. For exarriple,specify if the entity�s a corporation,lunited partnership,
LLC,etc. Also s pecify the state withui which the enuty�s ulcorpo�rated and provide the name of the corporate
contact person. Failure to provide accurate informat�on to the Engineenng Department will delay processuig
of project documents.
11. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer.
The purpose of this plan is for parking and traffic control during the public improvement construction phase.
12. The City Engineer may determine the necessity for, and requ�i�re submittal and approval of, a construction
access and parking plan for the home building phase.. If the Z:iry Engineer deems such a plan necessary, the
applicant shall provide the plan prior to issuance of bwlding permits.
13. Prior to final plat approval,the applicant shall pay the addressing fee. (STAFF GONTACT: Bethany Stewart,
Engineering�.
14. The applicant shall submit construction plans to the Engineering Department as a part of the Public Facility
Improvement permit, which indicate that they will constnict a half-street unprovement along the frontage of
North Dakota Street. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include:
A. Citystandard pa�ement section for a Neighborhood Route from curb to centerline equal to 16 feer
B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new unprovement back into the e�usting edge of pavement sha�l be
built beyond the site frontage;
C. concrete curb,or curb and gutter as,needed;
D. storm drainage, including any off-srte storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface
nuioff;
E. 5 foot concrete sidewalk with a 5 foot planter strip;
F. street trees in the planter strip spaced per TDC reqwrements;
NOTIC�OF DEQSION MLI'2006-00003/SQ�EENK PARTTTTON PAGE 3 OF 23
G. street striping;
�L streetlight layout by applicant's engineer,to be approved by City Engineer,
I. underground utilities;
� street signs (if ap licable);
driveway apron (�applicable ; and
L. adjustments ui verucal and�or horizontal alignment to construct SW North Dakota Street in a safe
manner, as approved bythe Engineering Department.
15. A profile of North Dakota Street shall be required, extending 300 feet either side of the subject site showing
the existing grade and proposed future grade.
16. The applicant shall cause a statement to be placed on the final plat to indicate that the proposed private street
will be�ointly owned and maintained by the private property owners who abut and take access f rom it.
17. The applicant shall cause a statement to be placed on the final plat to indicate that "Tract B" is subject to a
"storm sewer, surface water, drainage and detention easement over its entiret}�' granted to C1ean Water
Services (CWS). Tract B is subject to G�X/S standards for mauitenance and protect�on.
18. Prior to a proval of the final plat, the applicant shall prepare Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions
(CC.&R's) �or this project, to be recorded vcnth the final plat, that clearly lays out a maintenance plan and
ag reement for the proposed private street(s). The CCS�R's shall obhgate the pnvate propeny owners witlun
the subdivision to create a homeowner's association to ensure regulation of mauztenance for the street(s}: The
applicant shall submit a copy of the CC&R's to the Engineenng Department (Kim McMillan) pnor to
approval of the final plat.
19. The a licant's construction drawings shall show that the pavement and rock section for the proposed private
street�s�shall meet the Cit�s public street standard for a local residential street.
20. The applicant's plans shall show the public sewer extension as far north as possible to provide gravity flow.
The three laterals to the parcels shall also have positive grade in order to provide gravity flow. I} pumpmg is
necessary from the lou a structure for each parcel shall be u�stall prior to connecting to the public manhole. A
15 foot public sewer easement shall be provided over the sewer main.
21. The applicant shall provide a flow dissipater for the roof runoff from each home prior to discharging to the
vegetated corndor area. Th�s shall be shown on the plans for consuuction.
22. The applicant shall provide for the collection and disposal of stormwater runoff from the private street to an
approved public system This shall be shown on the plans for construction.
23. The applicant shall obtain a proval from the Tualatin Valley Water District for the proposed water connection
prior to�ssuance of the C"it�s Public Facility Improvement pernut.
24. An erosion control plan shall be�rovided as part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit drawings.
The plan shall conform to the Erosion Prevent�on and Sediment �ontrol Design and Plannuig Manual,
February 2003 edition."
25. The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to the Cat�s
global posiuonuig system(GPS) eodetic control network (GC 22) as recorded in Waslungton County survey
records. These monutnents s�be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as requ.ired for the
subdivision plat boundary. . Along with the coordinates the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert
ground measurements to gnd measurements and the ang�e from north to grid north. These coordinates can
be established by.
. GPS tie networked to the Cat�s GPS sucvey.
. By random traverse using conventional surveyuig methods.
26. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements:
A. Submit for City review four (4) pap er copies of the final plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to
practice in Oregon and necessarydata or narrative.
B. Attach a check u-i t�e amount of the current final plat review fee (Contact Planning/Engineering Permit
Technicians,at (503) 639-4171,ext.2421).
NOTTCE OF DEQSION MLI'200(r00003/SQ�ENK PARTITION PAGE 4 OF 23
� The final plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the m;n;,,,um standards set fonh by the Oregon
Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05) Washin�t on County,and bythe City of'T�igard.
D. The right-of-way dedication �or North Dakota Street providing 27 feet from centerline shall be made
on the final plat.
E. NOTE: Washin on County will not.begin their review of the final plat until they receive notice from
the Engineering �epartment mdicatuig that the Caty has reviewed the final plat and submitted
comrnents to the a�p pIicant's surveyor.
F. After the.Caty and C:oun have re��iea�ed the f inal plat, submit two mylar copies of the f inal plat f or
City Enguleer s��gnature�for partitions), or Caty Engineer and Commuruty Development Director
signatures (for subdivisions).
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF SITE OR BUILDING PERMITS:
e app cant s prepare a cover etter an su mrt it, a on wi any supporting ocuments an orp ans
that address the following requirements to the CURRENT P�ANNING DIVISION, ATTN: EMILY ENG
503-718-2712. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found:
27. Prior to receiving a buildin �erniit, the applicant/owner shall record a deed restriction to the effect that any
e�sting tree greater than 1�' diameter may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to.a
certified arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in
accordance with this decision should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree.
The a plicant shall re are a cover letter and submit it, alon with any su ortin� gdocuments and/or lans
that address the �ollowin requirements to the ENG�EERING �EPARTMENT, ATTN: �M
MCMILLAN 503-639-4171, �XT 2642. The cover letter shall cleady identify w here in t he su bmitta l t he
required infornlation is found:
28. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with a
"photom}�ar" copyof the recorded final plat.
29. Prior to issuance of building pemzits the applicant shall provide the Gty with as-built drawings of the public
unp rovements as follows: I) 3 mi� myiar, 2) a diskette of the as-bwlts in "DWG" format, if available;
otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable and 3) the as-built drawings shall be tied to the Cat�s GPS network The
applicant's engineer shall provide t�e Gty with an electronic f�le with points for each structure (manholes,
catch basins, water valves, hydrants and other water system features) in the development, and the�r respecnve
X and Y State Plane Coordinates,referenced to NAD 83 (91).
30. The applicant shall provide signage at the entrance of the private street that lists the addresses that are served
by the given street.
31. The applicant shall either place the e�sting overhead utilitylines along SW North Dakota Street underg round
as a part of this pro�ect, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the
frontage of the site that �s parallel to the utility lines and will be $35.00 per lineal foot. If the fee option �s
chosen,the amount will be $1,925.00 and it shall be paid prior to issuance of builduig pemuts.
32. During issuance of the buildin permit for Parcels 1, 2 &3,the applicant shall pay the standard�vater quality
and water quantity f ees per lot�f ee amounts will be the latest approved by G�X/S).
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO A FINAL INSPECTION:
e app icant s prepare a cover etter an su mrt it, a on wi any supporting ocuments an orp ans
that address the following requirements to the CURRENT P�ANNING DIVISION, ATTN: EMILY ENG
503-718-2712. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found:
33. Prior to a final inspection, the Pro'ect Arborist shall submit a final certification indicating the elements of the
Tree Protection Plan were followe�and that all rema;n;ng trees on the site are healthy, stable and viable in their
modified growing environment.
34. Prior to a final inspection,a member of the plannu7g staff will visit the site to ensu.re that the development is in
conformance with this decision.
NOTIC�OF DEQSION MLI'2006-00003/SC�-iENK PARTT7TON PAGE 5 OF 23
THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS OF THE
EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION NOTED UNDER THE PROCESS AND APPEAL SECTION
OF THIS DEQSION.
SECTION III. BACKGROLTND INFORMATION
Site Inforn�ation:
The propose partition is located on SW North Dakota Street, west of SW 93� Avenue and just south of Highway
217. The T-shaped vacant lot is 0.8 acre (34,958 square feet) and backs up to a wetland. It was originally part of the
Ashbrook Farm subdivision of 1907. The site �s relat�vely flat;sloping downward toward the wetland about 3% to the
northwest and about 4% to the northeast. The northern poruon of the site is heavily vegetated with shrubs and trees.
Single family homes surround the site to the west,east and south.
Pro osal Descri tion:
e applicant requests approval to partition the site into three lots of 8,188 square feet, 7,860 square feet and 8,514
square }eet for sulgle-farruly homes. The applicant aLso requests approval for an ad�ustment to the access spac�uig
standard because the proposed private street on SW North Dakota Street does not meet the 200-foot spacu��standard
for streets and driveways on a collector. However, an application for an adjustment is not required because SW North
Dakota Street is a neighborhood route.
SECTION IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Staff sent notice to all propertyowners within 500 feet and received two cominents. Full comments are included in the
land use file MLI'2006-00003. Below is a suminary of each comment and staff's response:
COMI��,NT:One neighbor wrote of her concerns regarding traffic,wildlife,trees and enjoyinent of her own property.
First, three more homes in the area will increase traffic. With the lack of sidewalks and low visibility at night,
pedestrians will be in more dan�ger than they already are. The neighbor suggested speed bumps to calm traffic. Second,
removal of trees on the site will disturb the e�c�sting wetland habitat and wildlife, as well as remove some of the no�se
buffer from Highway 217. Third,the neighbor has experienced drainage� �problems in the past because of the proximity
to wetlands. More development and removal of trees would not help th�s situation. The neighbor urges that the roots
of rema;,,�r,g trees be protected. Fourth and lastly,the neighbor requests that a wood fence that matches the e�vsting
fence be constructed to prevent residents of the proposed partition from using the access easement for the neighbonng
lots.
RESPONSE: Concerning traffic and lack of sidewalks,the applicants have been required to construct a sidewalk along
e partition's frontage on SW North Dakota Street. The City does not re u.ire speed bumps through land use review.
Citizens may request them through the Capital Improvement Program �QP) by contactang the Cit�s QP group.
Concerning trees,the apphcant proposes to save 5 out of 7 trees over 12 inches in diaineter and is reqwred to rrutigate.
Any trees in the vege�tated comdor will remauz as they are. The applicant or developer shall comply with the Gt}�s tree
protect�on code, which requu-es tree protection fencu� to protect the cntical root zone. Conceming drainage, the
applicant is requued to follow CZean Water Services and City standards. The applicant must provide for collection and
disposal of stormwater runoff from the pnvate street to an approved public system A flow dissip ater is required for
the roof runoff before it discharges mto the vegetated corridor. Conceming a fence,the Cirycan onlyreqwre a fence or
hedge through the partition process when a proposed driveway is within 10 feet of an ex�sting lot. In this case, the
applicants are proposmg a pnvate street that is not withu110 feet of the neighbor's propertyline.
COMNIENT: Another neighbor wrote of her concerns regarding the vegetative buffer re��quired by.C1ean Water
Services (C,�WS). She urged the City to require the buffer to be deeded to the City or Qean Water Services (C'WS) to
protect the area from encroachment from future propenyowners. In addition,she observed that there is a reat deal of
car parts and garbage that has been dumped in the northeast corner of the properry. The neighbor suggeste�the owner
be required to remove this debris in a maruier that protects the wetland and does not disturb the vegetauon. Lastly,she
requested that no fencing be placed on the east endof the vegetative buffer so that it remaii�s as nanu�l as possible.
NOTIC�OF DEQSION MLI'2006-00003/SQ�ENK PARTTTION PAGE 6 OF 23
RESPON�E: C�US requires the sensitive area to be protected with a 50-foot vegetative buffer that will be put in a
private tract and maintained per CWS standards. Per CWS, the applicant is reguired to dedicate an easement over the
entire buffer to either the City or CWS. CW5 does requ� ire fencuig between the development and outer limits of the
buffer. However,this fencuig will not be on the side of the neighbor's property.
SECTION V. APPLICABLE ftEVIEW CRiTERIAAND FINDINGS
Land Partitions (18.420)
Approval Criteria (18.420.050.A):
1:The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations;
The proposed partition complies or can be made to comp l�y with all s�atucory and ordinance requirements and
regulanons as demonstrated by the analysis conta.ined within this administrative decision and through the unposition of
conditions of approval. Provided all conditions of approval are satisfied as part of the development and builduig
process,this critenon is met.
2.There are adequate public facilities available to serve the proposal;
Public facilities are discussed in detail later in this decision under Street & Utility Improvement Standards (Chap ter
18.810). Based on the analysis provided therein,adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposal. Theretore,
this cntenon is met.
3.All proposed improvements meet City and applicable agency standards;and
The public facilities and proposed imp rovements are discussed in the Public Facility Concerns section of this decision.
Conditions of approval will ensure that all proposed improvements meet City and agency standan�s. Improvements
`vill be reviewed as part of the pernut process and dw7ng construction, at which time the appropriate review authority
will ensure that City and apphcable agency standards are met. Based on the analysis in t.h�s decision, th�s criterion �s
met.
4.All proposed lots conform to the specific requirements below:
(�a) The ininimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning
district
The widths of the building envelo�pe area for ParceLs 1,2 and 3 are 69 feet,81 feet and 66 feet,respectively. Therefore,
each new lot exceeds the standardof 50 feet.
(b) The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district In the case of a flag lot, the accessway
may not be included in the lot area.
The lot areas for Parcels 1, 2 and 3 are 8,188 SF, 7,860 SF and 8,514 SF. Therefore, all parcels meet the m;r,;rr,um lot
area of 7,500 SF.
�c) Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet or have a
egally recorded minimum 15-foot wide access easement
Parcel 1 will have 17.5 feet of fronta e on SW North Dakota Street as well as 112.88 feet of fronta e on the private
street. Parcel 2 will have 20 feet of�ronta e on the private street. Parcel 3 will have 17.5 feet o�frontage on SW
North Dakota Street as well as 112.83 feet o�frontage on the pnvate street.. Therefore, all parcels meet the rnuzimum
f rontage of 15 f eet.
(d) Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning distric�
Setbacks will meet muiunum requiremenu,as shown on the site plan and indicated later in this decision.
(e) When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard,provided
that no side yard is less than 10 feet Structures shall generally be located so as to maximize separabon from
e�stin� sttuctures.
NOTTC�OF DEQSION MLI'2006-00003/SQ-IENK PARTTTTON PAGE 7 OF 23
None of the parcels are flag lots. Wlule Parcels 1 and 2 appear to have "flag poles," theydo not meet the definition of
"flag lot" (in Chapter 18.120) because their "poles" do not serve as access drives. Therefore, this criterion does not
apply.
�fl A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an accessR�ay
is located R�ithin ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.745.040. Screening may also be
required to maintain privacy for abumng lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed
developmen�
While there is a 17.5 foot strip of land between both sides of the private street and the neighboring lots,the applicant
has indicated that screening will be provided.
(g) The fire district may re uire the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway would have
a detrimental effect on fire�ighting capabilities.
Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue did not indicate that the length of the proposed driveway would have a detrimental
effect on fire-f-ighting capabilities.
(h) Where a common drive is to be provided to seive more than one lot, a reciprocal easement which will
ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map.
The applicant is proposing a private street to serve three lots. Therefore,this cntenon does not apply.
5.Any access way shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.705,Access,Egress and Circulation.
As shown later in this decision under"Access,Egress and Circulation (18.705)," the standards in Chapter 18.705 have
been met.
6. Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the one-hundred year floodplain, the
city shall reyuire consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway ad�o�mng and
within the tIoodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevadon for the construction of a
pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway
plan.
The proposed partition is not adjacent to or in the one-hundred year floodplain, although it is close. The nearest
floodplaui is about 440 feet aw�ay from the artition site. The highest elevauon of the nearest floodplain is 160 feet.
The lowest elevation of the parution site is �80 feet. Because the pattition site �s not adjacent to or ui the floodplain,
this criterion does not apply.
7. An application for a variance to the standards prescribed in this chapter shall be made in accordance with
Chapter 18.370,Variances and Adjustrnents. The applications for the partition and variance(s)/adjustment(s)
will be processed concurrendy.
The applicant requests an ad�usunent to the access spacing standard for the proposed private street on SW North
Dakota Street. �-Iowever, s�found that the adjustment is not necessary; there}ore,the applicant will be refunded the
application fee. The applicant has not requested other adjustments.
FINDING: All approval criteria for the proposed partition have been met.
NOTTC�OF DEQSION MLP2006-00003/SQ�ENK PARTTTION PAGE 8 OF 23
Residential Zoning Districts (18.510)
Development standards in residential zoning districts are contained in Table 18.510.2. Below is a comparison
of the development standards and the proposed dimensions:
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS and PROPOSED DIMENSIONS
R 4.5 Pa�el 1 Pa�e12 Pa�e13
Standaids Pro osed Pro osed Pro osed
Muiimum Lot Size
-Detached unit 7,500 sq.ft. 8,188 sq.ft. 7,860 sq.ft. 8,514 sq.f�
Average Muiimum L.ot Width
-Detached unit lou 50 ft. 69 ft. S1 ft. 66 ft.
Muumum Setbacks
-Front yard 20 fr. 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft.
-Side facing street on corner&tlu-ough lots 15 ft. NA NA NA
-Side yard 5 ft. NA 5 ft. 5 ft.
-Rear yard 15 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft.
-Distance between property line and front of garage 20 ft. 20 fr. 20 ft. 20 fr.
-Side Yaid Setbacks for Fla Lots C 18.420 10 f�. NA NA NA
Maxitrnun Height 30 ft. Can be met Can be mct Can be met
Maxicnum He� ht for F I.ots C 18.420 25 ft. Can be met Can be met Can be met
FINDING: As shown in the comparison table above,development standards have been met or can be met.
Access,Egress and Cirrulation(18.705�
Cha ter 18.705 establishes standards and regulations for safe and efficient vehicle access and egress on a site
and�or general circulation within the site.
General Provisions (18.705.030):
A. Continuing obli�ation of property owner. The provisions and maintenance of access and egress stipulated
in this tide are cont�ntung reqLUrements for the use of any structune or parcel of real property in the City.
The applicant shall have the continuing obligation to maintain access and egress in conforn�ance with the Code and
this dec�sion.
B.Access plan requirements.
No building or other pernvt shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and�app roved as provided by this
chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be tultilled. The applicant shall
submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed inforniation about tlus submission
requirement
The applicant has submitted a site plan showing how access, egress and circulation requirements will be fulfilled.
Therefore,th�s critenon�s met.
C.Joint access.
Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize joindy the same access and
egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or pa�els of land satisfies the
combined requirements as designated in tlus tide, provided: Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in
the forrn of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the �oint use; and Copies ot the deeds,
easements,leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City.
The a�plicant does not propose joint access, nor is it required. All lots will have direct access to a private street.
There ore,this criterion does not apply.
D. Public street access.
All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.030I shall connect direcdy with
a public or private street ap�roved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required
standards on a continuous basis.
NOTICE OF DEQSION MLP2006-00003/SQ�EENK PARTTTTON PAGE 9 OF 23
All parcels will connect direct�ly t�o a private street. As required by the City, owners will be subL'ect to Codes,
Covenants and Restricuons (C;C;&R's), which will include a maintenance plan for the private street. Therefore, this
criterion is met.
E. Curb Cuts. Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Secdon 18.810.030N.
Ci.u-b cuts shall be in accordance with 18.810.030.N and will be reviewed prior to PFI permit issuance. Therefore, this
criterion will be met.
F. Re uired walkwa location. On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the standards in 18J05.C30.F.1
tluoug i 4.
The walkway criteria apply to commercial, institutional, industrial and multi-family uses. The proposed partition is for
single-familydetachedhomes. Therefore,the walkwayrequirements do not apply.
G. Inadequate or hazardous access.
(1) A,p�lications for building petmits shall be referred to the Commission for review when, in the opinion of
the Lhrector, the access proposed would cause or increase existing hazardous tra�c conditions; or would
provide inadequate access for emergency vehicles; or would in any other way cause hazarcious conditions to
e�st which would constitute a clear and present danger to the pubIic health,safety and general welfare.
The Director has not determined the proposed accesses would require review by the Corrunission. Therefore, this
criterion does not apply.
2) Direct individual access to arterial or collector streets from single-family dwellings and duplex lots shall be
iscouraged. Direct access to major collector or atterial streets shall be considered only if there is no practical
alternative way to access the site.
SW North Dakota Street is a neighborhood route. Therefore,this criterion does not apply.
(3 In no case shall the desi�n of the service drive or drives requ� ire or facilitate the backward movement or
o er maneuvering of a velucle within a street, other than an alley. Single-family and duplex dwellings are
exempt from this requirement
No service drive is proposed or required. Therefore,this criterion does not apply.
H.Access Management
(1) An access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways
and streets are safe by meeting adequate stackin needs, sight distance and deceleration standarcls as set by
ODOT,Washington C:ounty,the City and AAS�O.
The applicant's engineer has pr_ovided a preliminarysight distance certification for the intersection of theprivate street
with North Dakota Street. The posted speed on North Dakota Street is 25 mph which requires a m�n,murn sight
distance of 250 feet in each direction. The applicant's enguieer certifies that s�ght distance from the private street to
91st Court was measured to be 310 feet to the east and the sight distance to 93rd Avenue was measured to be 320 feet
to the west. Therefore, there is adequate sight distance in each du-ection from this private street onto North Dakota
Street.
�2) Driveways shall not be pernutted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street
intersections. Influence area ofintersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on ap roach
to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street inte�ection shaIl�e 150
feet,measured from the ng ht-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway.The
setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a
tra�c impact report submrtted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150
feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any ophon for shared access witil the ad�acent pa�el. If
shared access is not possible or practical,the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersect�on as possible.
SW North Dakota Street is not a collector or arterial. Therefore,this criterion does not apply.
NOTIC�OF DEQSION MLP2006-00003/SQ�ENK PARTITION PAGE 10 OF 23
(3� The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 fee� The minimum spacing
o driveways and streets aIong an artenal shall be 600 fee�
SW North Dakota Street is not a collector or arterial. Therefore,tivs criterion does not apply.
(4) The minimum spacing of local stmets along a local street shall be 125 feet
No new local streets are proposed. This criterion does not apply:
I.Minimum Access Requirements for Residential Use
�1) Vehicular access and e ress for single-family, duplex or attached single-family dwellin units on
individual lots and multi-fam�y residential uses shall not be less than as provided in Table 18.705.�and Table
18.705.2;
Table 18.705.1 states that the minirnum vehicular access and egress for three single-family dwelling units shall be one
20-foot-wide access with 20 feet of pavement �a private street). The site plan shows a pnvate street 20 feet wide with
20 feet of pavement. Therefore,this criterion�s met.
(2) Vehicular access to multi-family structures shall be brought to within 50 feet of the ground floor entrance
or the ground floor landing of a stairway,ramp,or elevator leading to the dwelling units;
The proposed use is single-family. Therefore,this criterion does not apply.
(3) Private residential access drives shall be provided and maintained in accordance with the provisions of the
Uniform Fire Code.
Tualatin ValleyFire and Rescue did not indicate that the private street would violate the Uniform Fire Code.
(4) Access drives in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the turning
around of fire apparatus by one of the following: a ci�u�ar, paved surface having a minimum turn radius
measured from center point to outside edge of 35 feet or a hammerhead-configured,�aved surface with each
leg of the hammerhead having a minimum depth of 40 feet and a minimum width o 20 feet The maximum
cross slope of a required turnaround is 5%.
The applicant does not propose an access drive. Therefore,this criterion is met.
FTNDING: Based on the findings above,the access,egress and circulation standards have been met.
DensityCom�utations (18J15�.
Section 18.715.020 provides density calculation formulas. Number of dwelling units is deternuned by the
following:
A. Definition of net development area. Net development area, in acres, shall be deternnined by
subtracting the following land area(s) from the gross acres, which is all of the land included in the
legal descnption of the properly to be developed:
1. All sensitive land areas
2. All land dedicated to the public for park purposes;
3. All land dedicated for pu6lic rights-of-way.
4. All land proposed for private streets; and
5. A lot of at,least the size required by the applicable base zoning district, if an e�risting dwelling
is to remain on the site.
The applicant provided the followirig calculation for net developable area:
Gross site area: 34,958 SF
Public ROW dedication: 110 SF
Private Street("Tract A") 2,257 SF
Vegetative Corndor("Tract B") 6,405 SF
et eve opa e area: ,
NOTIC�OF DEQSION MLP2006-00003/SQ�ENK PARTITION PAGE 11 OF 23
B. Calculating maximum number of residential units. To calculate the maximum number of residential
units per net acre, divide the number of square feet in the net acres by the minimum number of square
feet required for each lot in the applicable zoning distric�
The maximum number of residential units permitted is 3,as shown below:
26,185 SF/7,50C SF =3.49 units =3 units
G Calculatin minimum ntunber of residential units. As req�uired by Section 18.510.040, the minimum
number o�residential units per net acre shall be calculated by multiplying the maximum number of
units detemuned in Subsection B above by 80%(0.8).
The ininunum number of residential uniu is 2,as shown below:
2.49 units x 0.8 =2J9 ucuts =2 units
FINDING: The proposed partition complies with the densirypemiitted bythe Code.
Landscaping and Screenin��18.745�
Street trees (18.745.040):
A. All development projects fronting on a public street, private street or a private driveway more than 100 feet
in length approved after the ado tion of tlus tide shall be required to plant street trees in accordance R�ith the
standards in Section 18.745.040�
The applicants indicate they will be planting two street trees (Acer Rubrum/Red Sunset Maples) on each side of the
�nvate street. However, the applicant does not indicate a�ether there will be street trees along SW North Dakota
treet. Because Parcels 1 and 3 have frontage on SW North Dakota Street,the applicant is also required to plant street
uees along this fronta�e. Therefore prior to approval of the final plat the applicant shall indicate all street trees�(o_n
the street and utility unp rovement plu�s) along the private street an� frontage on SW North Dakota Street. The
applicant shall include the trees' size and species. S�z.e and spacing of street trees shall be as stated in Code Section
18.745.040.C.2.
B. Street Tree Planting List Certain trees can severely damage utilities, streets and sidewalks or can cause
personal injury.Approval of any planting list shall be subject to review by the Director.
Street trees shall be chosen from the Cat�s street tree list.
G Size and Spacin of Street Trees. The specific spacing of street trees by size of tree shall be as stated in
Section 18.745:040.�2 of the code.
The applicant indicates street trees along the p�rivate drive will be spaced 30 feet apart. In addition, the applicant has
been conditioned to provide a street and utility unprovement plan that includes streets trees along with theu- size,
species and spacing.
Buffering and Screening Requirements (18.745.OSO.B.S):
Where screening is required the following standards shall apply:
a. A hedge of narrow or broad leaf evergreen sluubs shall be planted which will forni a four foot
continuous screen of the height specified in Table 18.745.2 within two years of planting;or
b. An earthen berm �lanted with evergreen plant materials shall be provided wluch will form a
continuous screen o the height specified in T able 18.745.2 within two years. The unplanted portion of
the berm shall be planted in lawn or other living round cover or
c. A fence or wall o t the height specified in Tab l e�8.745.2 sha l�be constructed to provide a continuous
sight obscuring screen.
Screening is not required for the private street (only_street trees). However, the applicant indicates screening will be
provided on both sides of the private street. The type of screening will be Barberry (Berberis) bushes and
Kinnikk;nnik(Arctostaphylos) �round cover.
NOTTC�OF DEQSION MLP200Er00003/SQ�ENK PARTTTTON PAGE 12 OF 23
FINDING: Based on the findings above,Landscaping and Screening criteria have not been met,but can be met
bysatisfying conditions of approval.
CONDITTON: Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall indicate all street trees (on the street and
utiliry unprovements lan) alon the pnvate street and frontage on SW North Dakota Street.
Trees shall be chosen�rom the �t�s street tree list. The appli�cant shall include the trees'size and
s pecies. Size and s pacin g of street trees shall be as stated in�ode Section 18.745.040.G2.
Off-Street Parkin and Loading Rec�uirements (18.765�
Section 18.765.02 .A states that at the time o the erection of a new structure witlun any zoning district,
offstreet vehicle parking will be provided in accordance with Section 18.765.070 (minimum and ma�umum
parking requirements).
For single-family dwellings, one par�space per dwelling unit is required. The applicant acknowledges this
reqwrement. In addiuon,comphance will e regulated at the time of building pemuts. There�ore,th�s criterion�s met.
Section 18.765.030.B.1 states that off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-
family attached dwellings shall be located on the sarne lot with the dwelling(s).
The applicant indicates that the parking spa_ces will be provided on the individual lots. In addition, compliance will be
regulated at the time of building pemzits. Therefore,tivs criterion is met.
FINDING: Based on the findings above,parlflng and loading requirements have met.
Tree Removal(18.7901
Tree Plan Requirements (18.790.030):
A. A tree plan for the planting, removal and rotection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be
provided tor any lot, par�el or combination o�lots or parcels for which a development app lication for a
subdivision,partit�on, site development review,planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is
preferred over removal wherever possible.
A tree pre�servation and removal plan has been p�repared by certified arborists Philip Hickey(BS CA PI�1604A) and
David Halstead (BS, CA PI�01 6A, ASCA). The apphcant has not included a rrutigation an protection plan. In
addition there is no tree rotectio fencin shown on an of the lans. Therefore, nor to site w�ork,the a plicant shall
revise the tree removal,protection and mitgigation plan t show tree protection fencupig. This plan shall be upicluded with
submittals for the public facilities unprovement permit and with submittals for building pernuts.
B. Plan requirements. The tree plan shall include the following:
1. Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as
significant by the city;
The tree inventory identifies the size and species of all existing trees including trees subject to mitigation. The
ap plicant's arborists have identified seven trees over 12 inches in diameter that are healthy and able to be saved 172
dzaineter u7ches total). These trees have been given the following numbers: 72, 74, 80, 84, 85, 91 and 94. There ore,
this criterion is met.
2. Identification of a program to save e�sting trees or miti ate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper.
Miti ation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18�90.060D, in accordance with the following
stan�ards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping,
streets and parking lots:
(a) Retention of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program in
accordance with Section 18.790.060D of no net loss of trees•
(b) Retention of from 25% to 50% of existing trees over 12 inc�es in caliper requires that two-thirds of the
trees to be removed be miti ated in accordance with Section 18.790.060D;
(c) Retention of from 50% to 7�% of e�sting trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the
trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060D;
(d) Retention of 75% or greater of existin�trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no miti�ation.
NOTTC�OF DEQSION MLI'2006-00003/SQ-iENK PARTITTON PAGE 13 OF 23
The applicant proposes to remove trees #'s 80 and 85, retaiiung five (5) of seven 7) trees over 12 caliper inches or
diameter base height (dbh) that are preservable. Because 71% o} all trees over 12 c�per inches are being retained,the
applicant shall rrut�gate for 50% of those inches. Tree #80 is 13 caliper inches. Tree # 85 is 18 ca�l�ip er ir►ches. The
total number of inches removed will be 31 inches and the applicant shall mitigate for 15.5 inches. The applicant, not
the applicant's arborist, has stated they a�ill plant two mitigauon trees toward the rear of Parcel 3 and that these trees
will be Alders and a �proximately�12 cahper inches. While the Cityprefers mitigation trees to be as large as possible,it
is unlikely one wo�d find 12-calliper-inch trees at a nursery. Therefore,the project arborist shall deternline what size
trees can be planted. The Cit�s general policy on mitigating trees onsite is as}olloa�s:
. Only trees�spaced 20 feet on center or greater will be counted towarcis mitigation unless otherwise ap roved by
the Ciry. The trees must have enough soil volume and growing space to allow them to reach f�maturity
without becomm�a nu.isance or a danger to surrounding structures, utiht�es, hardscape, etc. Unless otherwise
approved by the ty,only two mitigat�on trees may be planted in a single backyard and only one tree per f ront
Y�•
The applicant,shall submit a mitigation plan prepared by a certified arborist,indicating the size, species and location of
proposed mitigation trees. If not rrutagatuig, the applicant shall pay the full rrutiganon fee of $1,937.50 ($125 per
caliper uich x T5.5 inches).
3. Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed;
The tree plan identifies all trees to be removed. Therefore,this criterion is met.
4. A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect
trees during and after construct�on.
The tree plan does not include a protection program. The applicant's arborist indicates that the project consulting
arborist will deterniine the protecuon prog ram and morutor the site through the duration of the project. Therefore
prior to site work,the project arborist shall submit a tree protection program defini� standards and methods that wil�
be used on site duruig and after constxuction bythe applicant and anyone working on site.
G Subsequent tree removal. Trees removed within the period of one year prior to a development application
listed above will be inventoried as part of the h�ee plan above and will be replaced according to Section
18J90.060D.
No trees have been removed in the past year prior to this application being submitted. Therefore,this criterion does
not apply.
Subsequent Removal of a Tree (18.790.040):
Any tree preserved or retained in accordance with this section may thereafter be removed only for the reasons
set out in a tree plan, in accordance with Section 18.790.030, or as a condition of a�pp roval for a conditional
use, and shall not be subject to removal under any other section of this cha�ter. The prope�rty owner shall
record a deed restriction as a condition of a�provaI of any development pemut affected by this section to the
effect that such tree may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according� to a certified arborist
The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this
section should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. The form of tlus deed restriction shall be subject
to approval by the Director.
A condition of approval requiring the above shall ensure that this criterion is met.
FINDING: Tree protection has not been met. The applicant shall satisfythe conditions below:
CQNDITIONS:
. Prior to site work, the applicant shall revise the uee removal protection and mitigation�lan to
show tree protection fencing. Tlvs plan shall be included witl�submittals for the public tacilities
improvement pemut and with subrtuttals for building pernzits.
NOTIC�OF DEQSION MLP2006-00003/SQ�ENK PARTITTON PAGE 14 OF 23
. Prior to site work,the project arborist shall submit a tree protection program definuig standards
and methods that will be used site during and after construction by the applicant and any�ne
working on site. These standards shall be included on the tree removal, protecuon and
mitigat�on lan. In addition, a copy of the tree protection Plan shall be included wlth the
subnuttals�or the Public Facilities Improvement Permit and building pern�its.
. Prior to site a�ork, the applicant shall submit a tree mitiga�tion plan if choosing to plant any
mitigation trees. The appIicant may plant trees onsite, of}site, and/or pay a fee-in-heu at the
rate of $12�5 per calip er mch. If the applicant chooses not to plant any rrutigation trees, the
applicant shaIl pay the fee for all 15.5 uzches ($1,937.50). Any tree rruugauon plan must be
approved by Current Plaruiuig. �nly trees spaced 20 feet on center or greater w�11 be counted
towards mit�gat�on unless otherwise approved by the City. . The trees must have enough soil
volume and growing space to allow them to reach full inatunty without becoming a nuisance or
a danger to surrounding structures, utilities, hardscape, etc. Unless otheiwi.se approved b the
C�ity, only two mitigauon trees may be planted in a single backyard and only one tree per�ront
Y�•
. Prior to site a�ork, the applicant, shall submit security,in the form of cash or other means
acceptable to the City for the eqLUValent value of tree rrutigation required at $125.00 per caliper
inch. If additional mitigauon trees are preserved throu�h the partition unprovements and
construction of houses, and are properly protected through these stages by the same measures
afforded to other protected trees on site, the amount of the cash assurance may be
correspondingly reduced. Any trees planted on the site or off site in accordance with
18J9Q.060.D will be credited agau�st the assurance for two years following final plat approval.
After such time the applicant shall pay the remaiiung value of the assurance as a fee inl�eu of
planting. Any p�lanting by the applicant must be approved by the City Arborist.
. Prior to site work, the applicant shall install all proposed tree protection fencing: The fencing
shall be inspected and approved by C�u-�-ent Plannuig prior to commencin any srte work The
tree protect�on fencuig shall reinain in_place through the duration o�all of the building
construcnon phases,until the fuial inspection has been passed.
<If the Builder is different from the Developer or initial applicant:> .
Pnor to issuance of building pernuts,the applicant shall submit site plan drawuigs indicatin the
location of the trees that were preserved on the lot during site development, location o�tree
protection fencing, and a s�nat�ure of approval from the project arborist re arding the
placement and constnuxion techniques to be employed in building the structures. �proposed
rotection fencing shall be installed and inspected prior to commencing construcuon. The
�encu' �g shall remain in place through the duration of all of the build'uig construction phases,
until the final inspection has been passed. After approval from Current Planning, the tree
protection measures may be removed.
. The Pro�ect Arborist shall submit written re orts to Cutrent Planning, at least, once every two
weeks, �rom initial tree protection zone �TPZ) fencing installauon, through__ t�he building
construction phases, as he monitors the construcuon act�viues and progress. This inspection
will be to evaIuate the tree protection fencing,deterniine if the fencing was moved at any point
during construction, and deterniine if any part of the Tree Protection Plan has been violated.
These reports must be provided to Czurent Planning until the final inspection. The reports
shall include any changes that occurred to the TPZ as well as the condition and location of the
tree�protection fencing. If the amount of TPZ was reduced then the Project Arborist shall
justi�y why the fencing was moved and shall certify that the construction acuvities to the trees
did not adverselyimpact the overal�,long-term health and stabilityof the tree(s).
If the reports are not submitted or received by Current Plaruiing at the scheduled intervaLs, and
if it appears the TPZ's or the Tree Protection Plan are not being f ollowed by the contractor or a
sub-contractor, the City can stop work on the project until an inspection can be done by
Current Planning and the Project Arbonst.
NOTTC�OF DEQSION MLI'2006-00003/SQ-�ENK PARTITTON PAGE 15 OF 23
. Prior to receiving a,building pernut the ap�plicant/owner shall record a deed restriction to the
effect that any ex�stuig tree greater t�an 12' diameter may be removed only if the tree dies or is
hazardous accordin-g to a certified arborist. The deed restnction may be removed or will be
considered invalid �t a tree preserved in accordance with this decision should enher die or be
removed as a hazardous tree.
. Prior to a final inspection, the Project Arborist ��ill submit a final certification indicating the
elements of the Tree Protection Plan R�ere followed and that all rema;n;ng trees on the site are
healthy,stable and��iable in their modified growing environment.
Visual Clearance Areas f 18J95)
This Chapter requires t a clear vision area shall be maintained on the comers of all property adjacent to
intersecting nght-of-ways or the inteisection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vrsion area
shall contain no vehicIe, hed e, pl�anting fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction
exceeding three �3) feet in heig�t �"he co�e provldes that obstructions that may be located in this area shall
be visually clear etween three (3) and eight(�) feet in height Trees may be placed within this area provided
that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed. A visual clearance area is the triangular area forrned by
measurin from the corner, 30-feet along the right of way and along the driveway and connecting these two
points wi�a straight line.
FINDING: A visual clearance area consistent with 18.795 is shown on the site plan.
CONQ.LJSION: This criterion is met.
Impact Study_(18.390)
Secdon 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with res�ect to each of the following criteria
when approving, approving with conditions ordenying an application:'
Section 1�.390.040 states that the applicant shall pro��ide an impact study to quantify the effect of
development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the
study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City.standard, and to minimize the impact of the
development on the public at lar-ge,public facilities systems, and affected private pmperiy users.
In situations where the Community Develo�ment Code requires the dedication of real properiy interests, the
applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedicat�on, or�rovide
evrdence that supports that the real roperty dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected unpacts
of the develo ment Section 18.390.�40 states that when a condition of ap roval requires the transfer to the
public of an interest in real property,the approval authority shall adopt findings whicFi support the conclusion
that the interest in real property to be transferned is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed
development will have on 11e public.
Sewer. The applicant's narrative states that a public sewer will be e�ended as far north as possible in the private street
tenninating with a manhole. The public main will have to be constructed with a positive grade in order to provide
gravity flow from the manhole to the ex�sting sewer main in North Dakota Street. A 15 foot public sewer easement
will be required over this public sewer main. Each parcel will be required to have a separate sewer lateral to the new
public sewer. If pumping,the laterals will have to be pumped uzto a structure prior to con.necting to the manhole with
a gravity flow lateral.
Water. Tualatin Valley Water Dis�tr�ict provides service in this area. The applicant shall obtain perinits from 1�1WD
prior to issuance of City perrruts. T'VWD has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it.
Storm Draina e: The G�X/S standards include a provision that would exclude small pro�ects such as residential land
partitions rom being required to provide an on-site water quantity facility. It would be unpractical to require an on-
site�ater quantity facility to accommodate detenuon for three residential parcels. Rather,the C,'WS standards provide
that applicants should pay a fee in-lieu of constructing a facility if deemed appropriate. Staff is recommending
payment of the fee in lieu on this application.
Concerning water quality, the applicant is required to� provide a flow dissipater for the roof runoff from each home
prior to discharg to the vegetated corndor area. The applicant is also provide for the collection and disposal of
stormwater runof�rom the pnvate street to an approved pubhc system.
NOTIC�OF DEQSION MLP2006-00003/SQ�ENK PARTTTTON PAGE 16 OF 23
Parks: At the time of building permits,the applicant or developer will pay a parks system development cha�e for each
house being built (total of three). Because no house was previously on the lot,there will be no credits to the parks
system development charge.
Trans�ortation: The averag�e s' le family home generates 10 trips per day�Instituite of Transportation Engineers Trip
Generation Manual- 4th Edition . Therefore,the prop�osed development ot three homes will generate an avera e of 3D
tri s er da . At the time of b�d�'n� emuts,the a licant or develo er will ay a Washin�ton County Traffic�mpact
Fe�e {'ITF) for each newhouse being bwlt(total of th�ie) to miti ate fopa ponion of the totaI traffic unpact. Because no
house was previously on the lot,there will be no credits towar�the TTF. Therefore the applicant will pay the full TTF,
as dicussed below. In addition, the applicant is being required to construct a sic�ewalk along the length of the SW
Dakota Street frontage.
Miti ated Costs and Ro h Pro ortionali .
The app 'cant � pay a ashington County Traffic Impact Fee �'ITF) at the time of building permits. The TIF is a
mitigauon measure that is reqwred for new development. Based on a transponation impact study prepared by Mr.
David L,aison for the A BoyEapansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61,TTF's are exp�ected to recapture 32 percent of the
traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system, The ap plicant will be re gu�ired to pay
TTF's of approxirnately$3,020 (Effective July 1, 2004) per new dwelling urut. Thereto:e, the TIF for this proposed
development is $9,060 ($3,020 �3 new dwelling uruts).
Based on the estimate that total TTF fees cover 32 percent of the imp act on major street imp r�ovements citywide, a fee
that would cover 100 percent of this pro�ect's traffic impact is $28,312 ($9,060 =0.32). The d�ference between the TIF
paid and the full impact �s considered �e unrrutigated ��np act on the street system The unnutigated impact of this
pro�ect on the trans ortation sy�stem is $19,252 (�28,312 - $9,060). The applicant will be required to dedicate additional
nght-of-way along �W North Dakota Street of 110 square feet. The a�gproximate value of ununproved residentially
zoned pro�perty is $3.00 per sguare foot, for a total value of $330. The City estimated the cost of constructing a
sidewalk along the SW North llakota frontage to be $7,500 (includes curbs and driveway apron): The applicant's total
cost of mitigating traffic impacts is $7,830 ($7,500 + $330). Based on the analysis below the reqwred improvements do
not exceed the estunated value of the urunitt�ated impacts. There is $11,422 worth o� uruniugated unpacts left over.
Therefore,the required 'unprovements meet the rough proportionalitytest for the rype of development proposed.
Estimated Value of Irr�acts
FullI�m�pact... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... $28,312
Less TIF Assessment... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .9,060
Less Miti ated Costs...... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ....7 830
Estimate V ue o Ururiitigated Impacts 11,422
PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS
Street And Utilit�Im rovements Standards (Section 18.810 :
Chapter 18.810 provi�es construction stand`ards or the implementation of public and private facilities and
utilit�es such as streets,sewe�,and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below:
Streets•
Improvements:
Sechon 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in
accordance with the TDC standards.
Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an e�usting
street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC.
Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a Neighborhood Route with bike
lanes to have a 58 foot right-of-way width and 36-foot paved section. Other imp rovements required may
include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street ligFiting, storm drainage, and
street trees.
This site lies ad�acent to SW North Dakota Street, which is classified as a Neighborhood Route on the Caty of T'i ard
Transportation�lan Map. At present,there is approximately 25 feet of right-of-way(ROV� from centerline,accor�ing
to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate the additional ROW to provide 27 feet from
centerline.
NOTTCE OF DEQSION MLI'2006-00003/SQ-�ENK PARTTTION PAGE 17 OF 23
SW North Dakota Street is currently partially improved. In order to mitigate the u� np act from this development, the
applicant should construct half-street improvements ui accordance with F�'g�-e 18.810.�.F of the TDG The decuion to
have the applicant provide the half-street improvements is based on a rough proportionality analysis.
Future Street Plan and E�.-tension of Streets: Section 18.810.030.F states that a future street plan shall be filed
which shows the pattern of e�sting� and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land
division. This section also states that where it is necessary to give access or pernut a satisfactory future
division of ad'oining land, streets shall be e�-tended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed and a
barricade sha� be constructed at the end of the street These street stubs to adjoining properties are not
considered to be cul-de-sacs since they are intended to continue as through streets at sucli time as the
adjoining prope�ty is developed. A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the property
owne� which shall not be removed until authorized by the City Engineer,the cost of which shall be included
in the street constiuction cost Tem orary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de-sac bulbs shall be
constructed for stub streets in excess o�150 feet in length.
Based on the location of this parcel,the location of the significant wedand to the north and the existing street pattern,
staff concludes there are no oppomuut�es for a future street connecuon.
Street Alignment and Connections:
Section 18.810.030.H.1 states that full street connections with spacing of no more than 530 feet between
connections is required except where prevented by barriers such as topography, railroads, freeways, pre-
existing�developments, lease provisions, easements, covenants or other restnct�ons e�usting prior to May 1
1995 which preclude street connections. A full street connection may also be exempted due to a regulate�
water feature if regulations would not pernlit construction.
Section 18.810.030.H.2 states that all local neighborhood routes and collector streets which abut a
development site shall be extended within t�ie site to provide through ci�ulation when not precluded by
environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns or strict adherence to other
standards in this code. A street connection or extension is precluded when it is not possible to redesign, or
reconfi�ure the street pattern to�rovide required extensions. Land is considered topographically constrained
if the slope is greater than 15/o for a distance of 250 feet or more. In the case of environmental or
topograplucal constraints, the mere presence of a constraint is not sufficient to show that a street connection
is not possible. The applicant must show why the constraint precludes some reasonable street connection.
There is a sigruficant wedand area located to the north of th�s development; therefore there are no opportunities to
e�rtend the street.
Grades and Curves: Section 18.810.030.N states that grades shall not exceed ten per�cent on arterials, 12% on
collector streets, or 12% on any other street(except that local or residential access streets may have segments
with grades up to 15% for distances of no greater than 250 feet). Centerline radii of curves shalI be as
deternuned by the City Engineer.
The grade along North Dakota Street is less than 5%,therebymeeting this criterion.
Private Streets: Section 18.810.030.T states that design standards for private streets shall be established by the
City Engineer. The City shall require le al assurances for the continued maintenance of private streets, such
as a recor�ded maintenance agreement �rivate streets servin�more than su�dwelling units are pernutted only
within planned developments,mobile home parks,and multi-family residential deveIopments.
The applicant has proposed the construction of a private street to serve the three parcels of this partition.
The applicant shall place a statement on the face of the final plat indicating the private street will be owned and
maintauied by the properties that will be served by it/them In addition, the apphcant shall record Conditions,
Covenants and Restnctions �C,&R's) along with the final plat that will clarify how the pnvate properry owners are to
maintain the private street. 'l�hese CC',8zR's shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to approval of the final
plat. The Cit�s public improvement design standards require Pnvate streets to have a pavement section equal to a
pubhc local street. The applicant will need to provide this type o}pavement section.
Block Desi ns - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with
due rega�to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for
convement access, ci�ulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and
oppoctunities of topo�raphy.
NOTTC�OF DEQSION MLI'2006-00003/SC�IENK PARTITION PAGE 18 OF 23
Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800
feet measured along the right-of-way line except
• Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wedands or other bodies of water or, pre-
e�sting development or,
• For blocks adjacent to arterial streets,limited access highways,major collectors or railroads.
• For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides eqi.uvalent access.
No new blocks are being fornled or required. Therefore,this criterion does not apply.
Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average
lot width, unless the pa�el is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning distric�
The lot depth of Parcel 1 will be 1.67 times the average lot width �115.13 ft/69 ft). The lot depth of Parcel2 will be
1.24 times the average lot width (100.5 ft/81 ft). The lot depth o Parcel 3 will be 1.74 times the average lot width
(115.43 ft/66 ft). Therefore,all parcels meet this cnterion.
Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of fronta�e on public or private
streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land pattition, 18.420.050.A.4.c ap lies, wluch requires a parcel to
either have a minimum L5-foot frontage or a rrununum 15-foot wide reco�ed access easement In cases
where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit,the frontage shall be at least 15 feet
Parcel 1 will have 17.5 feet of frontage on SW North Dakota Street as well as 112.88 feet of frontage on the private
street. Parcel 2 will have 20 feet of front e on the pnvate street Parcel3 will have 17.5 feet of frontage on SWNorth
Dakota Street as well as 112.83 feet of�rontage on the private street. Therefore, all parcels ineet the muiuni.un
frontage of 15 feet for partitions.
Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standarcis and be
located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets
shall have sidewalks on at least one side.
The applicant's plans indicate they will construct a 5 foot sidewalk along the east side of the private street. The
applicant shall also construct a 5 foot sidewalk and 5 foot planter stnp with the half-street improvements along the
North Dakota Street frontage.
Sanitaiy Sewers:
Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new
develo ment and to connect developments to existin mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in
Design and Construction Standards}or Sanitary and Surface Water Management(as adopted by Clean Water
Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted pohcies of the
comprehensive plan.
Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional
development mthin the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan.
The applicant's narrative states that a public sewer will be e�ended as far north as possible in the private street
tex7runaung with a manhole. The publ�c main will have to be constructed with a posit�ve grade in order to provide
gravity flow from the inanhole to the existing sewer main in North Dakota Street. A 15 foot public sewer easement
will be required over this public sewer maui. Each parcel will be required to have a separate sewer lateral to the new
public sewer. If pumping,the laterals will have to be pumped uzto a structure prior to connecting to the manhole with
a gravity flow lateral.
Stotm Drainage:
General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and
flood water runoff.
NOTICE OF DEQSION MLI'2006-00003/SQ�ENK PARTITION PAGE 19 OF 23
Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility
shall be lar�e enough to accommodate potential iunoff from its entire upstream drainage area,whetFier inside
or outside the developmen� The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility based on the
pro� visions of Design and Construction Standards for Sarutary and Surface Water Management�as adopted by
�'lean V�'ater Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments).
There are no upstream drainage w�ays that impact this development.
Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer
that the additional runoff result�'n� from the development will overioad an exist�ng drainage facility, the
Director and Engineer shall withFiold approval of the development until provisions have been made for
improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional iunoff
caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and
Surface Water Management(as adopted by C1ean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or
amendments).
In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek
Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a
stormwater detention/effective im�pervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up
to the 25-year event. The Ciry wiIl require that all new developments resulting in an uicrease of impervious surfaces
provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development �s located adjacent to Fanno Creek For those
developments adjacent to Fanno Creek,the storm water runoff will be pernutted to d�scharge without detention.
The CWS standards include a provision that would exclude small projects such as residential land partitions: It would
be impractical to require an on-site w�ter quantity faciliry to accommodate detention for three resident�al parcels.
Rather, the CWS standards provide that applicants should pay a fee in-lieu of constructing a facility if deemed
appropnate. Staff recommends payment of the fee in-lieu on this application.
Utilities:
Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication,
lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed under�ro� und, except for surface
mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets wf►ich may be placed above
ground,temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000
volts or above,and:
♦ The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the
underground services;
• The C'ity resetves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities;
• All underground utilit�es, incIuding sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the
developer,shall be constructed pnorto the surfacing of the streets;and
• Stubs for service connections sFiall be long enough to avoid distu�ing the street improvements when
seivice connections are made.
Exception to Under-Grounding Requiremen� Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-
lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing
utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority deternlines that the
cost and technical difficulty of under-groundin� the ut�lities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in
conjuncdon with the development The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common,
but not the only such situation is a short frontage development for which under- rounding would result in
the placement ot�additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities�acilities. An applicant for
a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public
right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding.
There are e�usting overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW North Dakota Sueet. If the fee in-lieu is proposed,
it is e ual to$35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 55
lineal�eet;therefore the fee would be$1,925.00.
NOTIC�OF DEQSION MLI'2006-00003/SQ�ENK PARTTTION PAGE 20 OF 23
ADDITIONAL QTY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY
IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS:
Public Water S stem:
Tualatin Valley Uater District provides service in this area. The applicant shall obtain pernzits from TVWD prior to
issuance of City pernuts.
Storm Water Quality:
The City has agreed to enforce Surface �'ater Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water
Secvices (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and 4rder No. 00-7) which
require the constn.ict�on of on-site water quality facihties. The facilities shall be desi�ned to remove 65
percent of the phosphonas contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff�enerated�rom newly created
unpervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and
method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year.
The CWS standards include a provision that would exclude small pro'ects such as residential land partitions. It would
be impractical to rec�u�i�r��e�an on-site water qualityfacilityto accommo�ate treatment of the storm water from ParceLs 1
2 &3. Rather,the C,� standards provide that applicants should pay a fee in-lieu of constructing a facility if deemec�
appropriate. Staff recommends payment of the fee in-lieu on this application.
The applicant shall provide a flow dissipater for the roof runoff from each home prior to dischargin to the vegetated
corridor area. The applicant shall also �rovide for the collection and disposal of stormwater runof�from the private
street to an approved public system. Th�s shall be shown on the plans for construction.
Grading and Erosion Control:
CWS Des�ig n and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and
other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development,
construchon, gradin�, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS
regulations the apphcant is reqt.ured to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to
issuance o�City pemuts.
The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
erosion control pernut be issued.for any development that will disturb one or more acre of land.
The applicant shall submit an Erosion Control Plan with the PFI application.
Address Assi nments•
The City o igard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of T'igard and within the Urban
Service Boundary.(L15B). An addressing fee in the amount of$50.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be
paid to the City pnor to f inal plat approval.
The developer will aLso be required to provide signage at the entrance of each shared flag lot driveway or private street
that lists the addresses that are served by the given driveway or street. This will assist emergency services personnel to
more easily find a particular home.
Surve Re uirements•
The applicant's inal p at shall contain State Plane Coordinates AD 83�(9� 1)] on two monuments with a tie to the
Gt�s global posrtiorung system(GPS) geodetic control network(�GC 22). These monuments shall be on the same line
and shall be of the same prec�sion as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat
shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to gnd measurements and the angle from north to grid
north. These coordinates can be established by:
. GPS tie networked to the Cat�s GPS survey.
. By random traverse using conventional surveyuig methods.
In addition, the applicant's as-bwlt d:,awings shall be tied to the GPS network The applicant's en�ineer shall provide
the City with an electronic file �-iih points �or each structlu-e (manholes, catch basins,water valves, �ts and other
water system features) in the development, and their respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates, re erenced to NAD
83 (91).
NOTTC�OF DEQSION MLI'2006-00003/SC�IENK PARTITION PAGE 21 OF 23
SECTION VI. OTHER STAFF COMMEN`TS
The City�o�f Tigard Engineerin Department has reviewed the proposal. Full comments are included in the land
use file MLl'2066-00003 (Schenk�artition). Findings and conditions of ap roval are included in the Access, Egress
and Circ��lation(18.705) section and Streets and UtilityImprovements {18.8r0�section of this decision.
City of Tigard Public Works Department reviewed the proposal and has the following comments and questions:
. Plan doesn't show connecuon to the public sanitary system
. Where is the access for maintenance w-here the chree lateraLs come together?
. Is the sanitaryprivate?
. What�s the size of the pipe?
. The plan is veryvague on drauiage. Where is the water going and how?
RESPONSE: The Cityof T'�igard Engineering Department has addressed these concerns in its conditions of approval.
City of Tigand Building Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it.
SECTION VII. AGENCY/OTHER SERVICE PROVIDER COMMENTS
Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has been given the oppornuutyto comment,but has not commented.
Tualatin Valley Water District has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it.
C1ean Water Services has reviewed the proposal and provided comments related to the sensitive area on the site,
sanitary sewer, storm drainage, water quality and erosion control. Full comments are included in the land use file
ML.I'2006-00003 (Schenk Partition). Staff has uicluded C,`WS requirements in its conditions of approval. In addition,
staff found that the boundary of the ro osed vegetative buffer does not match the boundaries a�pproved by CWS in
the service provider letter dated May�,2�06 (SPL# 05-005130). The applicant has indicated the 6uffer was averaged.
However, a�vle buffer-averaging �s po� ssible, it must first be ap proved by CWS through a service provider letter
review. Therefore, per CWS, the a pplicant is required to provide a new service provider with G� approval of the
proposed vegetative buffer as a condition of land use approval.
SECTION VIII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION
Notice: Notice was mailed to:
X The applicant and owners
X Owner of record within the required distance
X Affected govemment agencies
Final Decision:
THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON MAY 21,2007 AND BECOMES
EFFECTIVE ON UNE 6,2007 LJNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED.
�� eal:-
The D-irector's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise
adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as pmvided in Secuon 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in
accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2, of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written
aEpeal to,gether with the re�quired fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice
o}�Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and foims are available from the Planning Div�sion of T'igard City
Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,Oregon 97223.
Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the
specific issues ident�fied in the wntten comments subrrntted by the parties during the comment period. Additional
evidence concerning issues Qroperly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be subrriitted by any party durin_g the appeal
hearing,subject to any addiuonal rules of procedure that maybe adopted from tune to tune bythe appelIate body.
NOTICE OF DEQSION MLI'2006-00003/SCHENK PARTTTTON PAGE 22 OF 23
THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON JUNE 5,2007.
�estio�ns:
If you ha�e any questions, please call the Ciry of T'igard Czurent Planning Division, T'igard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall
Boulevard,T'igard,Oregon at (503) 639-4171.
Mav 21,2007
P ARED :y ng DATE
t I,lanner
-Lcv� May21,2007
REVIE Y: c ard I� Bewersdo DATE
Planning Manager
NOTTCE OF DEQSION MLI'200(r00003/SQ�EEIVK PARTTTION PAGE 23 OF 23
. � --_ —---, -- - - --
I ---�N-- �
GEOGRAPM f INFOk���/+iION SYSTLM ��I
�cE VICINITY MAP '�
W =_________
Q MLP2006-00003
�
V�-LR2006-00085
= P�7�'I
� ON�
�
- W
- � LEGF.?�1D:
Q
— _ 'y� , suBJECr
�' _ SITE
�j,
',
9 FERR
DAKOTA ST
AO
�-
��j
f �l
�� _ ^
1
��i ' �/
W a~ �BONrtA
2 ] _ �_ ,
F- �
� —�EEFHENOM'' _
Tiqard Nea Map
� �
� N
W
0 80 160 240 320 400 Feet
� -�1
� 1'=312 feel
�RFFi�e�R .�
G
� e
�O Intormalion on this map is(or general bcation only and
LEW IS LN � should be ve�ified with lhe Davelopmenl Services Division.
o� LOMITA 131255W Hall Blvd
Tlgard,OR 97223
-___i (503)639�171
--- ���_� � _...- � http:!lwww.ci.tigard.or.us
I I
Community Development Plot date: Mar 20,2007;C:lmagiclMAGIC03.APR
o� 30� so� sa ��Llop A qi2ss.cu/U.G��Fo
SCALE:7"-30� ASHBROOK FA " � 7S
BK 2. PG 33
sourr+uNE oF wEruHasas
DE7ERMMED BY/LLPHA COMMUNliY DEVELOPMENT .
N 00'41�aa•E �r o,au N 88°5839'E 200.00'
6.00'Q.Q 5.98'(PP) . —
� qZ � TWU
r TRACT"B° �e a.o� 43 trn�.��.s
� i VEGITATION CORRIDOR r^�R ��a�' � t°^„ g
� � ir,nrneR 6,405 SQ.FT. �
�4S q6 gt'd �i
N 88°58'39`E 200.\ '�2-is�D � z� ~
�y �— �_ �, — — s7.66' ��'
��., ,— 5�.05� . 8',4,�ER \�Q_ �
P � e�iuoEa / Q9 j �,•aix o^ira.oeR � ---i�a� � I
a �� - ��'i9-------•- 4/
socm+unrEOF g�j,r� se
8 F��zo�E � PARCEL 1 PARCEL 2 PARCEL 3 ��
� 8,188 SQ.FT. �� 7,860 SQ. FT. 3 8,514 SQ.FT. �
24'Q4K �a'ix ��V?
� ^ EALDER-��� 4S 15�R� " FWN?HDRNEq/_UMP � �
� 74'AI.DER s.,q�p � g a0
O �� � � 78 Z �5
� 3� � ��E 2003-)72937 ~
p� � z:ca�oer�s .L 8400)
�J � g 76 � o��,.� i r-
�1 W � N �p,q(,pFp 7Q- N897D3B'E 8.77'
� � �. N S r� N 8920Yi8'E B7.29' � �
' � 72'A(DER ; = -----�^ "+ �
-- . ��
� � g Z - ,,.,� I RA �'�D s�W Z�T'�� �� i � 1 .--,.-.. ,
�
1 1; �� �y "j'�-�''
*N^ � S 89°iD3'48'W 75.00'L� <a� � � � ��`r � t t�
°� — /. \�� �s�/ S 89°Q?'48'W 70.00' :
Zs� � �� � � � ` �{ ..
� �� \ � I � � � I � C i = w
� ,_ ; _.
DEED DOC.NO. d k+l � ' � � � �
SGLLE.���30' 9fr100015 � ��� `� i 5'SiDEWAIK + � � i
REG(S7c`FtED T.L 8300 $� i �� c^i � $ $ � ` ( 1
PROFESSIONAL � i "�c . " i q� �, DEED DOC.N0. $ ; y !
wv�sumiEVOR 3 i i 3� 3 � � w 2o03-oiasa2 .� m : i ;
� $ $ gC1T�' � � $ T.L 8300 3 m 'a • ;
Ct g �' ' �3n�'. � � � � � o � o c�i �
� Gyn • e T 7 ►.
Ecanr 8' i 8 "N � � FDbE-PAVEMEIJr' i QY Q .:�
cEE a" aa ` Q Z i Q� " $ `: ¢3 �'Q j
HGUgE
IXPIRES G�YDB � � I � }iUUSE �m Q r�.. y�
� • � .L+Z � m
I I � i � I O �� .+•-. "�
PARCEL 1 � l 1 zacuoo�nav 1 )� ) zaawom+c.anav ;.. � m v
p[ 17.50'I 20.00' 7. 7o.ar —5 ar -p p�2 --� Q
I- 75.ar —— C i Q m
— 89t.t3'48'W 55.00' � S�
. O p W � q �+
W� ^ UIiaCA -� �
N �i$ -
��� Q S.W. NORTHDAKOTA STREEf_ _ —
_ i_ ,r, —
�
N
CURVE RADIUS Af2C LENGTH CHORD LENGTH CHORD BfARING OELTA ANGLE TANCENT
NOTES Ct 35.00' S5.43' 49.81' S 45'3a'08' E 90'44'09' J5.45'
_ C2 35.00� 54.53' 49.16' N 44'25'S2' E B9'15�51' 34.55'
1.ALL BEAAINGS AND dSTNJCES ON THE ATTACHED
SURVEY MAP ARE CALCULATfD UNLESS SPEpFICALlY
sra�Oni�se. PRQIECT: pROPOSED PAFiT1710N OF
2.ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS f�FER TO THE CURREMTAX DEED DOCUMEIJr NO.2003-1 7293 7
ASSESSORS MAP 1513508. ,
3.PL47 BOOK.nND PAGE AEFErtENCES ARE T0 LOCATlON: PAA7 0F LOT 24,ASHBROOK FARM,BE/NG PAR7 0F THE
wasrrinicroNCaJnavanraFCOROS. D.C.GRAHAMD.L.C.LOC4TEDlNTHES.E.7/40FSEC.
35,T 15.,R 7W OF THE W.M.,WASHINGTON COUMY,
4.SURVEYREFEfiENCESARETOWASHINGTONCIXINTI' OREGON.MAPNO.1S 1 35DB
SURVEYAECOROS.
5.WE7LAN0.S BOUN4ARY PEH ALPFfA COMMUNRY CLIENT.� DATE: JAN 03,2007�.
OEVELOPMENT AS SMOWN ON PROJECT NO.328-028
DRawinrG Oa�O SEPrEMeeAZ�,2aos. DAN SCHENK SCALE: ��_��
7.VECv4TA71VE CORRIROq TO BE OIMJED IN COMMpN BY JOB NUMBER: 04-414H
PaRCEi.s i,z.aNO s. LEGEND
COVE LAND SURYEYS,INC.
— CENTERLWEOFfiL14DORS7HEEf 1475WASHING70N OREGONCITY,OREGON97045 (503)656-4975
NOTICE OF T�'PE II DECISION
.,
MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2006-00003 =
SCHENK PARTITION ' p°� ' '
120 DAYS = 7/13/2007
SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY
FILE NAME: SCHENK PARTITION
CASE NOS: Minor Land Partition(MLP) MLP2006-00003
Adjustment (VAR) VAR2006-00085
PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Minor Land Partition approval to partition a 34,958-square foot
lot into three lots of 8,188 square feet, 7,860 square feet and 8,514 square feet for
single-family homes. The site is currently vacant. The applicant is also requesting approval
for an Adjustment to the access spacing standaxd for private streets on a collector.
However, an adjustment is not required because SW North Dakota Street is a neighborhood
route.
APPLICANTS: Daniel Schenk&Marilyn Adair OWNER Daniel Schenk Living Trust
7115 SW Virginia Avenue 7115 SW Virginia Avenue
Portland,OR 97219 Portland,OR 97219
ZONING
DESIGNATION: R 4.5: Low Density Residential. The R 4.5 zoning district is designed to accoininodate
detached single-farivly homes with or without accessory residential units at a muiunum lot size
of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are permitted conditionally.
Some civic and institutional uses are also pernutted conditionally.
LOCATION: 9175 SW North Dakota Street;Washuigton CountyTa�c Map 1S135DB,Tax Lot 8400.
PROPOSED PARCEL 1: 8,188 Square Feet
PROPOSED PARCEL 2: 7,860 Square Feet
PROPOSED PARCEL 3: 8,514 Square Feet
APPLICABLE
RE VIE W
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.745,
18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
SECTION II. DECISION
Notice is hereby given that the Gty of �gard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED die
above request. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at
City Hall.
THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS
FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION.
All documenrs and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection.at no cost or copies can be
obtained for twent�five cents (25�) per page,or the current rate charged for copies at the tune of the request.
SECTION III� PROCEDURE AND APPE�IL INFORMATION
Notice:
Notice mailed to:
X The applicant and owners
X Owner of record within the required distance
X Affected government agencies
Final Decision:
THIS DECISION IS FINAL 4N MAY 21, 2007 AND BECOMES
EFFECTIVE ON JUNE 6, 2007 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED.
�A-�eal-:
The D-irector's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise
adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as� provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in
accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code wluch provides that a
written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director wrthin ten (10) busuiess days of the
date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Plannuig
Division of Tigard CiryHall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223.
Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the
specific issues identified in the written comments submiaed bythe parties during the comment period. Additional
evidence concerning�ssues Qroperly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be subrrutted by any party during the appeal
hearing,subject to any additional xvles of procedure that may be adopted f rom tune to tune by the appelIate body.
THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON UNE 5, 2007.
estions:
oF��urt�er information lease contact the Planrvng Division Staff Planner, EmilyEng at (503) 639-4171, Tigard
City Hall, 13125 SW Hall�oulevard,Tigard, Oregon 97223 or by email to emil��hgard-or.gov.
VICINITI'MAP
w =_________
' \iLP3006-C100Q3
�'_�1R3U06-00(1$5
� SCHENK
m
P_�RTTTION
LEGEND:
� _ 'Sjyy SUBJECT'
—�-\�� StI'8
^'�#�:��\I 2�1
I
�
�ST .�-�...
r �'�
� f' � ..i.�:�.'�:,
w �..�'..',°.. -- '
> � _�ry�l�
.
�
cRFFNe� �
Rc
� s '� .... .._
'��.
Mry nt d e. . ,���m��
0 4 '��p/1 4/tS514A/,6
��-� ASHBROOK FARMS
8K 2.PG 33
.ir.r r�r.va.r�nm _
��� �.o
�f � v�v�a�oNCOR�oon A��\ � �
� aras so.vr. 1, T
n F
� Nerrac wam �+`�10�
� '` �^ �` � ` �
` � -��--L='v
� Pqq��„1 PARCEl t P�9
B.iBa SO.FT. x 7.86090.Ff. D.51! .FT.
� s��'„ � "�"_" _ �'�' �
�" °-.� • � �,.# � '' r
�y
4i S ,,,�,'� � �=�r.r _ ..,.
��w g � �
§' n�� 1.� ~�f �y, -- n.w — � �'k
� � 1�`� '°. I •rm.rw
2 � g� �� �' � � �
F1'8do" w. o � � ' � �
g r�wvr
�� �° '= 8
L�a�J : I t �s e�/ q�..P4E.w � .
G�'r � �; � ; ; @ tZ__...� ; B
� � �' ;� ...-.....� � ��' ��
•� ' LL<
m.F.e,s °o '�' wuN � o � .
, � 'l�ga
.�e, �i i .� i I . �.n.- -- °��J `
�. _ . ¢
� yl� . Ul�idra °ia �
�� S.W.M0191N
__—I__$—.'�4T�4T�Er_—_—_
�'
�iss
�..�o,..�.�.w..
i° ""0��� w�umm.�nnrnva
on.a..anw o[mooaucr�rru�i�an
� �p IDf IIOIL IMTlOPLOIM..WMJM�MIl99Wlf0'M
��� D.G dWwYnLC.WCarlpnMS[Lvffa[c
�p���� ;l11,11�WOf11EWN IM9MRriWLMY,
O�CGG't YM n0.�t f aLN
�_ fIBI1: 011! JW�4�1.
o- . pVIlfY61f �F I�b.
�.a.va� m�axr�NCw�n��� AlntMeB[ M+�M
NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE,LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER
THE TIGIIRD DEVFI.OPMF;NT CODE REQUIRES 'IT-IAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTIC�, IT SI�AI.L, BE PROti�II''IZY
FORWA.RDED TO THE PURCHASER.
NOTICE OF PENDING ,�
LAND USE APPLICATION :
MINOR LAND PARTITION , , �
DATE OF NOTICE: March 20,2007
FiLE rruMSERS: MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 200G-00003
ADJUS"I'MENT (VAR) 2006-00085
FILE NAME: SCHENK PARTITION
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to partition a 34,958-square foot lot into three lots of 8,188
square feet, 7,860 square feet and 8,514 square feet for single-family homes. The site is currendy
vacant. The applicant is also requesting apptoval for an adjustment to the access spacing standard
because the proposed private street on SW Dakota Street does not meet the 200-foot spacing
standard for streets and driveways on a collector. There aYe at least seven driveways within 200 feet
of the proposed private street
LOCATION: 9175 SW Dakota Street;Washington Counry Tax Map 1S135DB,Tax Lot 8400.
ZONE: R-4.5: Low Densiry Residential. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached
single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square
feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are permitted condirionally. Some civic and
institutional uses are also permitted conditionally.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.370, 18390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.745,
18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS:
Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written
comments on the application to the Ciry. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON APRIL 3, 2007.
All comments should be directed to Emil�Eng,Assistant Planner (�c2712�,in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW
Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at 503-639-4171 or by e-mail to
Emil�a.ri�ard-or.gov
ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE
DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION-
MAKING PROCESS
THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECENING CONII�IENTS AND VALUES YOL`R INPUT. COI��fEN'1 S ��'ILL
BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS
T'ENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 26, 2007. IF YOU PROVIDE COMNfENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY
OF THE FULL DECISION ONC� IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF
THE PERMt1NENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
. �
♦ Address the specific "Applicable ��eview Criteria" described in the sectiot. aoove or any other criteria believed to be
applicable to this proposal;
♦ Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response;
♦ Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with
sufficient specificity on that issue.
FAILURE OF ANY PARTY TO ADDRESS THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CItITERIA WITH SUFFICIENT SPECIFICITY
MAY PRECLUDE SUBSEQUENT APPFALS TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS OR CIRCUIT COURT ON
THAT ISSUE. SPECIFIC FINDINGS DIRECTED AT THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA ARE WHAT
CONSTITUTE RF.,I,EVANT EVIDENCE.
AFTER THE 14-DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHAI.L ISSUE A T`YI'E II ADMINISIRATIVE DECISION. THP,
DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHAI.L BE MAIL�D TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500
FEET OF T'HE SUBJECT SITE,r1ND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITI'ED WRITTEN COi�LIvIENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO
NOTICE. T�DIRECTOR'S DECISION SFIALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAI.CRITERIA. BASED UPON TI-IE CRIT'ERIA
�1ND THE F�CTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD,TFIE DIRECTOR SF�II.L APPROVE,APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE
REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION.
SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS:
♦ The application is accepted by the City
♦ Notice is sent to properry owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written
comment period.
♦ The application is reviewed by Citq Staff and affected agencies.
♦ City Staff issues a written decision.
♦ Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and a11 owners or contract purchasers of record of the site;all owners of record
of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tas assessment roll; any City-recognized
neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agenry which is entided to notice under an
intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise
entided to such nodce.
INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW:
The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained
within the record and are available for pu6lic review at the City of Tigard Community Development Departtnent. If you want to
inspect the file,please call and make an appointment with either the project planner or the planning technicians. Copies of these items may
be obtained at a cost of$.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be
directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the secuon tided "Your Right to Provide Written
Comments."
VIC[NITS'�D�IAI' .
' \ILP3W(r00003
V�R?006-0003�
_� SCHENI�
� P_�RTTTION
:,EGEND.
5'JBJECT
�i- s;r�
�r�
� �--��
� ��.,?_y�°�
s.
- �.
.
�
�+REfN� �
R�
L S � � �
nb t m i
�ECEIVED
._ '�I�C;�fV��C`
MAR Z 1 2007
MAR ? � � TUALATI N VA
l�UALi�TI�`�! `��%'aLLEY �ATFR DIST
REQUEST FO�T����NTS ��
-
�l��rE: �sar�h ?o, �007 RECEIVED PLANNIN . . �
TO: Tualatin Valley Water District Administrative Offices APR 0 2 20G;
FROM: Cit�- of Tigard Planning Di�-ision CITY OF TIGARD
ST1�FF C:ONT?�C'1': Fmil� Rng, rlssistant Planner (12712�
Phonc: (5(�3) 639-4171 Fa1: (SO3) (84-7?9? I:mail: Emily(a�ri�ard-or.gov
MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2006-00003/ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2006-00085
➢ PARTITION Q
REQUEST: The a�}�licant is requesring appro�-al to partition a 34,958-syuare foot lot into dlree lots of 8,188 squarc feet,
7,860 sguare feet and 8,�1-� syuare feet for single-famil�- homes. 'I'he site is currend�- �-acant. The applicant is also
requesring approval for an adjustment to the access spacing standard because the proposed private street on SW Dakota
Street does not meet the 200-foot spacing standard for strcets and drivewa}�s on a collcctor. 'I'here are at least se�-en
driveways within 200 feet of the proposed private street. LOCATION: 9175 S��I Dakota StYeet; Washington County� TaY
I�1ap 1S135DB, Ta� Lot 8400. ZONE: R-4.5: Low Dcnsin- Residenrial. "I'he R-4.5 zoning district is designed to
accommodate detached single-famil�- homes with or without accesson- residential units at a miiumum lot size of 7,500
square feet. Dupleties and attached single-famil�- units are permitted condiuonall��. Some ci�-ic and insriturional uses are also
permitted condirionall��. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Communin- De�-cic>pment Code Chaptcrs 1£�370,
18.390, 18.420, 18.51(1, 18.705, 18.715, 18.745, 1£�J65, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
_�ttached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for ��our rc��ic�t�. I�rom uif<>rmation supplicd b�-
�-arious departments and a�encies and from other informarion a�-ailable to our staff, a report and recommendadon will be
prepared and a decision �vill be rendered on thc roposal in the near future. If vou wish to cominent on dus application,
WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK B�: APRIL 3, 2007. You ma}' use the space pro�rided below or attach a
separate letter to return ��our comments. If you are unable to res�ond b�� thc abo�°e date, please phone the staff contact
noted aboi-e with ��our comments and confirm vour commcnts in �vriting as soon as possible. If�•ou ha�-e an�- yuestions,
contacT the 1'igard�Plannin�;Di�-ision, 131?� S��°Hall I3oulc�-ard, Ti�ard, OR 97?23. � �
�PLEASE CHEI:K THE FOLLOVt%ING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
� ��'e ha�-c rc�-ie�ti-ed the proposal and ha�-c no �bjecuons to it.
_ Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter or email.
_ Written comments pro�-ided Uelow:
Name&Number of Person Commentin : '
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ��
-
-
Dl-�TE: �farch 20,2007 ���'a�^�-� �~� , �
. �
TO: Mark Vandomelen,Plans Examination Supervisor �rypR � 6 f'
CITY OF T)GpRU
FR0�1: Cit��of Tigard Planning Di, �-ision P�ANNING/EIy��NEERING
ST�-�FF CON"1.-�CT: I-:mil�• F.ng„.�ssistant Planner (t2712�
Ph<>ne: (503) G39-4171 Fal: (503) (84-7?97 I:inail: Emily�a.ti�ard-or.gov
MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2006-00003/ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2006-00085
�_�� �����, ���� +�. ➢=����E� PARTITION Q
REQUEST: 1'he applicant is requesting appro�-al to partirion a 34,958-square foot lot into three lots of 8,188 square feet,
7,8G0 syuare feet and 8,514 square feet for single-famil�- homes. "1'he site is currentl�� �-acant. 'i7ze applicant is also
requesting approval for an adjustment to thc access spacing standard because the proposed private street on SW llakota
Street does not meet the 200-foor spacing standard for streets and dri�-e�va�-s on a collector. "1'here are at least seven
dri�-ewa�•s within 200 feet of the proposed pri��ate street. LOCATION: 9175 SW Dakota Street; Washington Counn-Tax
�1ap 1S135DB, Tax Lot 8400. ZONE: R-4.5: Low Densit�� Residenrial. The R-4.5 zorung district is designed to
accommodate detached single-famil�- homes with or without accesson� residenual units at a minimum lot size of 7,500
square feet. Duple�es and attached single-famil�- units are permitted condirionall��. Some ci�-ic and insriturional uses are also
permitted condirionall�-. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Communin- De�-elopmenr Codc (:hapters 18370,
18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.745, 18.7C5, 18.79�, 1�.795 and 18.810.
.�ttached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for �-our re�-ie�v. From intc�rmaric>n supplied b�
various departments and a�encies and from other informauon a�-ailable to our staff, a report and recommendarion will be
prepared and a decision �vill Ue rendered <�n the proposal in the near future. If��ou wish to comment on this applicarion,
WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: APRIL 3, 2007. You ma}- use the space pro�-ided belo�v or attach a
separate letter to return your comments. If��ou are unable to res�ond b�• the above date, please phone the staff contact
noted above �vith vour comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any quesrions,
contact the Ti�ard�Plannin�Di�-ision, 13125 SW Hall Boule�-ard,'Ti�tid, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
� We ha�-e re�-iewed tlle prop�sal and ha�-e no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter or email.
_ Written comments pro��ided below:
Name&Number of Person Commenting: � S
� -. .
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ��
-
-
ll�"1'E: '�farch 20,20U7 , . �
'I'O: PER ATTACHED
FRO�i: Cit�of Tigard Plannin�Di�
S'T��FF CONTI'�C`I': F_.mil�� En�. .�ssisrant Planner (X2712�
Phone: (5O3) 639-=�171 f�at: (5O3) 6�4-7?97 I�mail: Emily�a,riQard-or.gov
MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 200G-00003/ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2006-00085
�jG�N� ➢�4� PARTITION Q
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting appro�-al to parririon a 34,958-square foot 1<�t into thrce lots of 8,188 square feet,
7,860 square feet and 8,514 square feet for single-family h�mes. 'I7ie site is currentl�- �-acant "1'he applicant is also
requesting approval for an adjustment to the access spacing standard because the proposed private street on SW Dakota
Street does not meet the 200-foot spacing standard for streets and dri�-ewa�-s on a collector. T'here are at least se�-en
dri�-e�va��s �vithin 200 feet of the proposed private street. LOCATION: 9175 SW Dakota Street;Washington Counn� Tas
�fap 1S135DB, Tax Lot 8400. ZONE: R-4.5: Low I�ensitv Residenrial. 1'he R-4.5 r.oning ciistrict is designed to
accommodate detached single-famil�- homes with or without accessor�• residenrial units at a minimum lot size of 7,500
square feet. DupleYes and attached single-famil�- units are permitted condirionall��. Some ci�-ic and insrituuonal uses are also
pern�itted condiuonally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Communin- llc��elopmcnt C<�de Chapters 18.370,
18.390, 18.420, 1�.510, 18.705, 18.715, 1�.745, 1�.7<�5, 18.790, 18J95 and 18.810.
��ttached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applieant's Materials for ��our re�-ie�v. I�rom infc�rmarion supplied b�-
�-arious departments and agencies and from other informauon a��ailable to our staff, a report and recommendation will be
prepared and a decisi�n �vill be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If�-ou �s�ish to comment on this applicarion,
WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: APRIL 3, 2007. �'ou may use the space provided below or attach a
separate letter to return y�ur comments. If��ou are unable to res�c>nd b�� the above date, please phonc the staff contact
noted above with your comments and confirm vour comments in �vriting as soon as possible. If��ou have an�� quesrions,
contact thc Ti�ard Plannin�;Di�-ision, 13125 S��'Hall Boule�-ard,'1'i�ard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
_ VUe ha�-c re�-iewed the pr�posal and ha�-c no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
I'lease refer to the enclosed letter or email.
_ Written comments provided below:
Name&Number of Person Commenting:
r
, „ r'TY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOP '1MMENTS
NOTIFICA, LIST FOR LAND USE & COMMUNITY DE .PMENT APPLICATIONS
FILE NOS.: �"� �- �� �G�� - U��� _� FILE NAME: � ��-�I� �Cx�4 ��►-,
CITIlEN INYOLVEMENT TEAMS
14-DAY PENDING APPLICATION NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES OF AREA: ❑Central �East ❑South ❑West
/ —
CITY OfFICES
LONG RANGE PLANNING/Ron Bunch.Planning Mgr. COMMl1NITY DVLPMNT.DEPT./Planning-Engineering Techs. POLICE DEPT./Jim Wolf,Crime Prevention Offic
�BUILDING DIVISION/Mark(residential)Brian(commercial) �6NGINEERING�EPT./Kim McMillan,Dvlpmnt.Review Engineer _PUBLIC WORKS/Matt Stine,Urban Forester -
CITY ADMINISTRATIONICathy Wheatley,City Recorder �PUBLIC WORKS/ROb Murchison,Project Engineer _PLANNING COMMISSION(+��sets)
�PLANNER—POST PROJECT SITE 10 BUSINESS�AYS PRIOR TO A PUBLIC HEARING! _HEARINGS OFFICER(+2 sets)
SPECIAL OISTRICTS
fUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.��TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE 8 RESCUE� ' TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT�k �CLEANWATER SERVICES+�
� r'lanning Manager North Division �Administrative Office Lee WalkerlSWM Program
15707 SW Walker Road John K.Dalby,Deputy Fire Marshall PO Box 745 155 N.First Avenue
Beaverton,OR 97006 14480 SW Jenkins Road Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124
Beaverton,OR 97005-1152
LOCAL AND STATE IURISDICTIONS
CITY OF BEAVERTON � CITY OF TUALATIN �IF OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS
Planning Manager Planning Manager Devin Simmons,Habitat Biologist Melinda Wood�w�uN Fo�,�,n.q�+.sa�
_ Steven Sparks,Dev Svcs Manager 18880 SW Martinaui Avenue NoRh Willamette Watershed District 775 Summer Street NE,Suite 100
PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 18330 NW Sauvie Island Road Salem,OR 97301-1279
Beaverton,OR 97076 Portland,OR 97231
_ OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM.
METRO-LAND USE 8 PLANNING � _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.8 MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE
_ CITY OF DURHAM � 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380
City Manager Portland.OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232
17160 SW Upper Boones Fry.Rd. Bob Knight,oauR�«,«ce����zcn� US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG.
Durham,OR 97224 Paulette Allen,GrahhManapementCoordmator OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.B DVLP. Kathryn Harris�M,P.acws�en..o�iy�
_ Mel Huie,c��,:p�co«amaco.tcPazoA� Larry FrerlCh�comP P�a�nmenamen�son�y� Routing CENWP-OP-G
CITY OF KING CITY� _ Jennifer Budhabhatti,Regwnal Planner(Wetlands) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 PO Box 2946
City Manager _ C.D.Manager,GrowlhManagementServices Salem,OR 97301-2540 Portland,OR 97208-2946
15300 SW 116th Avenue
King City,OR 97224 WASHINGTON COUNTY�
OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY 1Pw:en�es��/veal OR.DEPT OF AVIATION�MO�oao�e ro..�� Dept.of Land Use&Transp.
Bonneville Power Administration Tom Highland,P�e����9 155 N.First Avenue
CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO � Routing TTRC—Attn: Renae Ferrera 3040 25th Street,SE Suite 350,MS 13
Planning Director PO Box 3621 Salem,OR 97310 Hillsboro.OR 97124
PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 �St8V2 CO(1W3y(General Apps�
Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Gregg Leion�cPn>
_ OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ODOT,REGION 1 � Brent Curtis�can�
CITY OF PORTLAND (NOtify(or WenanAS antl Po�entiai Env�ronmentai Impacts) Development Review Coordinator poria Mateja�zca�Ms,a
Planning Bureau Director Regional Administrator _Carl Torland, Right-of-Way Section�va�iw�s� _Sr.Cartographer�cPNZ�e�MS+.
1900 SW 4'"Avenue,Suite 4100 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders _Jim Nims,s�rve�onz�A,MS�5
Portland,OF 97201 Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037
OR.PARKS 8 REC.DEPT.
WA.CO.CONSOL.COMM.AGNCY ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A� _ODOT,RAIL DIVISION STATE HISTORIC
Dave Austin�wccca��•s„°,MO�,a..o...,,� S8(Tl HU(721CII,Assistant Dislrict Menager (NOHfy if ODOT R!R-Hwy.Crossinp is OnlyACCeas to Land) PRESERVATION OFFICE
PO Box 6375 6000 SW Raab Road Dave Lanning,Sr.Crossing Salely Speciallst (NOUFy if Property Has HD Weday)
Beaverton,OR 97007-0375 Portland,OR 97221 555-13'"Street,NE,Suite 3 725 Sumner Street NE,Suite C
Salem,OR 97301-4179 Salem,OR 97301
UTILITY PROYIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES
PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERNISANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(euru�gton Northem�Santa Fe R/R Predecessor�
Bruce Carswell,President 8 General Manager
1200 Howard Drive SE
Albany,OR 97322-3336
SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS COMCAST CABLE CORP. �TRI-MET TRAN5IT DVLPMT.
Clifford C.Cabe,Co�struction Engineer Debra Palmer�n.r,�e.a��,�s o��Y� Gerald Backhaus,s�w,�.A�aa���o nr a.o,���s w�m��v.n,��e o��r���s��a«,�e>
5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Ben Baldwin,Project Planner
Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street
Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland,OR 97232
�wPORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC �NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY VERIZON �MCaaos3a� _QWEST COMMUNICATIONS
Ken Gutierrez,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord. Brandon Kahler,Engineering Lynn Smith,Eng.ROW Mgr.
9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue 20575 Vonnewmann Dr.,Suite 150 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110
Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Beaverton,OR 97075-1100 Portland,OR 97219
TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 COMCAST CABLE CORP. COMCAST CABLE COMMUNIC.
Teri Brady,Administrative Offi��°— Jan Youngquist,Demographics Alex Silantiev ,S�M��.�a��, Diana Carpenter��eo���Ma��w�
6960 SW Sandburg Street 16550 SW Merlo Road 9605 SW Nimbus Avenue,Bldg. 12 10831 SW Cascade Avenue
Tigard,OR 97223-8039 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Beaverton,OR 97008 Tigard,OR 97223-4203
�Ir INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN 500'OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANY/ALL
CITY PROJECTS(Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To NotifY�. h:lpatly\masterslRequest For Commenls Notification List.doc (UPDATED: 8-Nov-o6)
. �
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ��
-
ll��TI�,: llarch 2O, 20U7 , . �
TO: Rob Murchison, Public Works Project Engineer ,,- /
�
FR0;�1: Cit�-of"I'�ard�annin�I�i�-ision /
STr�FF CONTACT: �mil�- I�:n�, Assistant Planner (s2712� � �
Y'hone: (503) G39-�171 I�a�: �503) 684-7?9�, Email: Emily(a�ugard-or.gov
MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP}�0 . ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2006-00085
PA TITION Q
REQUEST: The applicant is rcyuesting ap�rc>�-al t<� parrition a 3�,958-square foot lot into three lots of 8,188 square feet,
7,860 square feet and 8,51=� syuare feet for single-famil�- homes. '1'he site is currend�- �-acant. '1"he applicant is also
requesring appro��al for an adjustment to the access spacing standard because the proposed pri�-ate street on SW Dakota
Street does not meet the 200-foot spacing standard for streets and dri�-e�va��s on a collector. Thete are at least se��en
ciriveways within 200 fect of the proposed private street. LOCATION: 9175 SW llakota Strcet; Washington County TaY
l�7ap 1S135DB, '1'a1 I.ot 8400. ZONE: R-4.5: I.o�v Densin- ResidenriaL The K-4.5 zoning district is designed tc�
accommodate detached single-famil�• homes �ti�ith or without accesson� residenrial units at a minimum lot size of 7,500
square feet. Duplexes and attached sin�le-famil�� units are permitted condirionall��. Some ci�-ic and insriturional uses are also
permitted conditionall�-. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Communin- De�-elo�ment (:ode Chapters 18.370,
18.390, 18.420, 1 H.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.7�5, 1�.765, 18.790, 1�J95 and 18.�iO. �
.lttached are rhe Site Plan, Vieinity Map and Applieant's Materials for ��c>ur re�-ic«-. f�rc�m infc�rmatic�n supplied b�•
�-arious departments and agencies and from other informauon a�-ailable to our staff, a report and recommendaaon �vill be
prepared and a decision «�ill be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If��ou�vish t� cc�mment on this application,
WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: APRIL 3, 2007. You mat- use the space pro�-ided below or attach a
separate letter to return ��our comments. If you are unable to res�ond b�� thc above date, plcase phone the staff contact
noted above with ��our comments and confirm vour comments in writing as soon as possiblc. If vou ha�-e any questions,
contact thc Tigard Planning I�i�-ision, 13125 SW Hall Boule�-ard,Ti�ard,OR 97223. �
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
_ VUe ha�-c rc��ic��cd thc prop�sal and }iai-c no objccuons to it.
_ Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter or email.
_ Written comments pro�-ided below:
Name&Number of Person Commenting:
� .
7 � � �C��,...i C�—� Cc�l'Y1 W Z�v�-�"
�- I��,-�- ��%
1�'� � ��
�
/�.�r��- � s �-,� l�Lt,�'
�N
�c��c e �
Ke v��'� --�—
�7 �� �IST�C-T
/ �
�, ��j .�� 2� °���.�,
� � �
��� �� ���� � �
-�.�iu, 7 �� -
•
' �;��G �1,�,� �3 q��s s.ui � ,���o�
p' 30' 60' 90'
SCALE ���-30� _ AsNe�ooK FA�n�s .
BK 2. PG 33
SOUTH LINE OF WETLANDS AS �
DETERMINED BYALPHA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
�
N°°°a�'aa�E �2�ofvc� N 88°58'39"E 200.00'
6.00'(M)5,98'(PP) �Q �
� � �'ALDER � 12"ALDERS �
r TRACT'�B�� Jyy(�ALDER 7yy�/v� ^ � � O
� VEGITATlON CORRlDOR ALDERg� o �
§� ��N/ eissip�� � � 6,405 SQ. FT.
� g� �
m � 12'ALDER �-�1-10"OAK Zcc�o �"
N 88°58'39"E 200.00' 2-�a'AND _
Mj - 8f.30' 6i.66'
v 57 05' �
!L 8"AL Q-1 �I I
��L II �LDER�N �� II f4"OAK p----i4"ALDF_F7 �I �
CQ�, 7"ALDER �3 ' � �
SOUTH LINE OF , 12"ALDER i � co�
o `� PARCEL 3 ��
BUFFER oNF � PARCEL 1 ;o PARCEL 2 � g,5�4 SQ. FT. ^i
STO R M �RPtI NA 6� 8, 188 SQ. FT. �3 � 7,860 SQ. FT. 3 ��
� 24"OAK— g �o•oax � a o'
�
' 6"ALDER�'�� �� 76"ALDER-~�� ^ NqWTHORNECLUMP ^� �
� i� 8"ALDER �a o �i �
,�- �14"ALDER�g•ALDER I o � z �
� ,� Z i
� a'�� �.°:s"ALDERS 'z ' �
� ''� ' DEED DOC. NO. ► 2003-1 7293 7 i
� �� 6"ALDER � 2;g�,qLDERS 1 I (T.L. 84�0)
�N � �$ I I C3---34"OAK �� �
�1 L'-�u f� �N � 10"ALDER - - - - - - - - - - - _ -I N 89 20'S8"E 8.71'
� � �
a, p� �o - - - N 89 20`58' 81.29` _s= w I
� a N �Z 12'ALDER _ _ ��2L � _ ��;�".�N,_� �
� � � g '�15°p , ,S892�'58" � `��'� °� zv `�cWE�� IJWs��- �
�4"ALDER I � S�UJ�R � �I
� ; o
N I` zi 7URNAROUND � � i "� J
L_ � l
� —
o � � i S 89°03'48"W 75.00' � ��� � i _ I�� I I bh _,� S 89°03'48"W 70.00' (
, � �'�v�� �� �� � �%�G�'
o � !, / � � � � �
z , 6„PEAR � \ ��,f� �� V � � �
I 1 i 4r � ; �
y � I i � / i. i
DEED DOC. NO. ��I I� ' i �
SCALE: 1"=30' 96-100015 o I� �ooi ��JE
T.L. 8300 I �
REGISTERED � �� I�, I h � g
PROFESSIONAL � rn DEED DOC. NO. g
IAND SURVEYOR � �� �i I � W 2003-014642 "
T.L. 8300 �
� g S ��' oa _°o =
� -- S t �N� I N S�W�K u N� O
g �g� _ � � � s�w�� �,s�MEur �
JUREGO 006 Z �` ��, � � M}"�U 1+0��= CES�',) �
LEE A. PLIRGEON I � = � � � z
EXPIRES 6/30/08 � � = � I
' � I �
� ,
e � � I I
� �� � , � i � w�� Mt��rs
I 2'ROAD DEDICATION
PARCEL 1 Q i i 2'ROAD DEDJCATfO� ! �� � � � � � II� � 70�, —5•00_
� 17.50' 00 � 1 T. 0
� � ,_ 75.00' --- 89°03'48"W 55.00' -''
w •
N
g�$ �r�K sEw��>
�� S � �i�nrt i n n vnTn CTR��r ��- Y _ —
r�. �
� � -- _
�
N
CURVE RADIUS ARC LENGTH CHORD LENGTH CHORD BEARING DELTA ANGLE TANGENT
NOTES ci 35.00' S5.43' 49.81' S 45'34'08" E 90'44'09" 35.45'
C2 35.00' S4.53' 49.1 S' N 44'25'S2" E 89'15'51" 34.55'
i.ALL BEARINGS AND D1S7ANCES ON THE ATTACHED
SURVEY MAP ARE CALCUTATED UNLESS SPECIFICALLY
srArEO orHERw�sF. PROJEC7: PROPOSED PARTITION OF �
2.ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS REFER TO TNE CURRENT TAX DEED DOCUMENT ND. 2003-1 7293 7
ASSESSORS MAP 1S135DB.
3.PLAT BOOK AND PAGE REFERENCES Af�E TO LOCATION: PART�F LOT 24,ASHBROOK FARM, BEING PART OF THE
w,asHrNGrorv CouNn�Pc,ar RECORDS. D.C. �f�NHAM D.L.C. LOCATED!N THE S.E. i/4 OF SEC.
35, T 15., R fW OF THE W.M., WASHINGTON CDUNTY,
4.SfJRVEY REFERENCES ARE TO WASHINGTON(.:OtJNTY OREG(��1. MAP N0. 7 S i 35D8
SURVEY RECORDS.
5.WETLANDS80UNDARYPERALPHACOMMUN171' CLIENT: DATE: �AN03, 2007
DEVELOPMENTAS SHOWN ON PROJECT N0.328-028 DAN SCHENK 1"=30'
DRA WING DATED SEPTEMBER 27,2oos. SCALE:
7.VEGATATiVE CORRIROR TO BE OWNED IN COMMON BY JOB NUMBER: 04-4148
PAACELS 1,z,arva s. LEGEND
LOVE LAND SURVEYS, 1NC.
- --- CENTERLINE OF RQAD OR STREET 1415 WASHfNGTON OREGON CITY, OREGON 97045 (503) 656-4915
�
.
s �
�
� � �����
��,,�- '
� � .
��� -� � �
P� ? .
��'�p' � �"�`vr`�`�"""
,��-�-�►,� �` ��.�'�`- �
� ��'��
�� ��� �� ,
��'��,1�, �d ��,�`-c
� ���� �z���
►
. . . � �� � ✓
March 31, 2007
Emily Eng, Assistant Planner ,��( ,��rl r �
City of Tigard � ���V
13125 SW Hall Boulevard
Tigard, OR 97223 ` �007
1;►1Y t.ir ► ;•::�ARD
Re: Schenk Minor Land Partition (MLP) 2006-00003 �'1_/��!��Ii�,,�r;.�-�,s-:��n�r_�G
Adjustment (VAR) 2006-00085 ' �-�-°�!!�C
Dear Ms. Eng:
With regard to the approval process for the above partition, I have some comments to make as
one of the owners immediately adjacent to the property. It would have been helpful if the notice
had included a diagram of the proposed lot layout for the partition, but as far as I could tell by
the letter, I would need to make an appointment during City business hours in order to see what
the owner proposes. That was not possible for me. So, in looking at the lot from the street, it
appears that none of the proposed parcels would have a house that is actuaHy accessing North
Dakota from the street, but all would be using a feeder from the back of the property. Some of
my comments are based on that assumption:
1. With single family residences, the average number of cars per household is two, and if
there are teenagers, often three. Even if only two per household, that is six more cars
with however many trips per day coming out of a single opening that is right next to
another flag lot making access on the East, a drive way immediately adjacent on the
west, and the flag lot private road access for my house and my neighbors to the north
and the street driveway of my neighbor on the south. It is already difficult to see
because of the fact that sidewalks or clear pathways have not been required to be
completed on this side of the street. There are numerous children and adults walking in
the street all day, early in the moming and at night resulting in visibility issues for drivers.
There is no way of knowing how many children might be added in the houses to be
completed as a result of the partition, and it increases the danger of vehicle and
pedestrian interaction. Some of these dangers might be resolved by speed bumps being
put in the length of this section of North Dakota Street.
2. When I moved in ten years ago, I was told that the areas that were undeveloped were
wetlands. Regardless of whether it was true then and not now (which by the way I
checked with the City a couple of years ago and was told the area was Wetlands), no
development has been done in any of the areas adjacent to the freeway during that
period. Now, the city has just approved a 45 unit condominium taking a large portion of
the property that had been presumed wetlands, leaving a narrflw"buffer strip" that I
believe someday is going to be "eaten" by 217 because of the traffic bottleneck. This
proposed partition is to take up more wetlands ground, and all of these grounds are
currently heavily utilized by nesting birds of various species as we{I as the fact that all of
the trees and brush give some assistance with the noise level and drainage problems
throughout the area. The trees that will be removed are full of wildlife as well as
absorbing some of the freeway noise---the noise is not a main concern of mine,
however, as I expected it when I moved here, but wildlife will decrease and noise will
increase as a result of removal of more trees and bushes in both of these developments.
3. Wetlands---that is a majar issue that I came face to face with when I purchased this
house which had apparently met the Tigard requirements for development. The fact is
that this ground is WET most of the year, and I would wonder where the drainage is
going to go once the ground cover that IS there, pretty or not, has been removed along
with all of the root systems of the trees that are cuRentty located on the property. With
my house, the city approved a Sewer Pump to be placed UNDERNEATH the house
_. . . Y !
WITHOUT an alarm system-whether the city was aware there was none makes no
difference as to the result. Within two weeks of moving in, I was plagued with a terrible
stench and found several feet of sewage underneath my house, nearly reaching the
underside of the floor—the prior owners did not know their pump was not working when
they sold it to me, and I actually did not know that there WAS a pump because it was
listed as connected to a public sewer. Since the prior owners had only had the house 8
months and it was less than a year old, I had not expected any problems that wouldn't
be covered, but the contractor was no longer responsible as I was the second owner. In
any event, in addition to the City approving a sewage pump under the house, there was
no provision for the run off due to the slant of the property, which is similar in nature as
the ground level of the land to be partitioned. I ended up spending a total of around
$10,000 for clean up, for putting a water drainage system the length of the property to
catch some of the runoff, putting in curbing at the parking turnaround, and installing a
new sewer pump �UTSIDE the house with an alarm system. My point is that the City
approved everything that was done in the removal of t�ees on this lot, the drainage
system and where it would empty, as well as the sewer pump location. I don't know
what the codes are today, but it doesn't bode well for how this very"waterlogged" area is
going to be developed---it would appear that it ought to be Wetlands and left alone.
With respect to protection of the remaining trees, the construction practices on these lots
damaged the root system of an enormous tree which had to be removed a couple of
years after I moved in because it had become in danger of toppling. It appeared that the
circle of the tree's root system had not been protected enough in terms of how
construction practices, and I would hope that root protection of the remaining trees
would be a requirement of any construction on the partitioned property.
4. My immediate neighbor and 1 are on a private drive owned by us and we have already
had surveyors using the driveway to access the property for which this partition is being
requested. If this partition is approved, then iYs my request that the partitioner be
required to construct a wood fence that matches the fencing at the end of the easement
drive the full length of the driveway adjacent to our properties. This is not only for
purposes of avoiding problems during the construction phase, but also so the future
residents of the lots are not trying to use the driveway for access to the street.
I don't anticipate that this partition is going to be tumed down on the basis of anything that I
have stated in this letter, but I would expect that there will be some requirements for the
development that will protect the homes that already exist. Developing the property reduces the
value of my property, in which I have put a lot of money, but t know that that is not a concem of
the city. However, one of the reasons that I purchased this was NOT to have traffic and
because I believed the area between here and the freeway was protected wetlands. However,
since it appears that is not to continue, I would like to have the impact minimized as much as
possible. I d�n't want to end up with more water or have any part of any of the drainage
systems of any of the development run "to the west", and would like to have the issues of traffic,
tree root systems, and protection of the enjoyment of my property addressed.
I appreciate the opportunity to have submitted comments. If there are any questions, I can be
reached at 503-620-4003.
Sincerely, �
r �
1 ;�
,_,..;...�'C�.��-G� �[ ��"�-b`-�
Karen Estrada
9269 SW North Dakota
Tigard, OR 97223
. . • � sl,f
� ���.
CleanWater Services
Oiir c�uniiniYincn� i� cic:ir.
MEMORANDUM
' i
DATE: April 3, 2007 %
�
FROM: Bill Baechle ��Clean Water Services
TO: Emily Eng, City of Tigard
SUBJECT: Review Comments—MLP 2006-00003, Schenk Partition
GENERAL COMMENTS
■ This Land Use Review by Clean Water Services (District) docs not constitute approval of
storm or sanitary sewer compliance with the NPDES permit held by the District. The
District, prior to issuance of any connection permit, must review and approve final
construction plans.
• All provisions of the development submittal shall be in accordance with current Clean Water
Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards, presently Resolution and Order No. 04-
09 (R&O 04-09), the Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Manual, December 2000
edition, and all current Intergovernmental Agreements between the City and CWS.
■ Final construction plans must be reviewed and approved by CWS for conformance with
current Design and Construction Standards. A Stormwater Connection Permit shall be issued
by CWS prior to construction.
SANITARY SEWER
■ As proposed, a public sewer extension shall be required in accordance with current CWS
Design and Construction Standards. A public sewer easement shall be required over the
entirety of Tract"A".
■ Each lot created by this Partition shall be provided with a gravity service lateral and direct
connection to the public sanitary sewer. The service lateral must connect directly to a public
sewer located within public right-of-way or public sewer easement and adjacent to the parcel.
The service lateral cannot cross an adjacent parcel.
STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY
■ Each parcel shall be provided with an individual connection to a public storm conveyance or
an approved private on-site stormwater disposal system approved by the City, with
2550 SW Hillsboro Highway • Hilisboro, Oregon 97123
Phone: (503)681-3600• Fax: (503) 681-3603 •www.CleanWaterServices.org
. , . -
stormwater discharging into Tract"B" and in accordance with current CWS Design and
Construction Standards.
■ The Developer shall provide a water quality facility to treat all impervious surfaces being
constructed or preserved as part of this development or pay a fee-in-lieu of constructing a
water quality facility, as approved by the City, in accordance with CWS Design and
Construction Standards.
SENSITIVE AREA
■ Sensitive areas have been identified on this site. CWS has issued a Service Provider Letter
(SPL), File No. OS-005130 for this site, dated March 1,2006 (Tax/Map 1 S 135DB08400).
■ Development of this site shall be in accordance with all provisions and conditions of SPL No.
OS-005130.
EROSION CONTROL
■ Provide erosion control in accordance with current CWS Design and Construction Standards.
MEMORANDUM ���,�
�� ���
- �`� � ?007
DATE: A ril 3, 2007 CITY p�"I'iGARD
p '� en!^.'�n;r;''=A�r,�,r�t�end�
FROM: Bill Baechler, Clean Water Services
TO: Emily Eng, City of Tigard
SUBJECT: Review Comments—MLP 2006-00003, Schenk Partition
GENERAL COMMENTS
■ This Land Use Review by Clean Water Services (District) does not constitute approval of
storm or sanitary sewer compliance with the NPDES permit held by the District. The
District, prior to issuance of any connection permit, must review and approve final
construction plans.
■ All provisions of the development submittal shall be in accordance with current Clean Water
Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards, presently Resolution and Order No. 04-
09 (R&O 04-09), the Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Manual, December 2000
edition, and all current Intergovernmental Agreements between the City and CWS.
■ Final construction plans must be reviewed and approved by CWS for conformance with
current Design and Construction Standards. A Stormwater Connection Permit shall be issued
by CWS prior to construction.
SANITARY SEWER
■ As proposed, a public sewer extension shall be required in accordance with current CWS
Design and Construction Standards. A public sewer easement shall be required over the
entirery of Tract "A".
■ Each lot created by this Partition shall be provided with a gravity service lateral and direct
connection to the public sanitary sewer. The service lateral must connect directly to a public
sewer located within public right-of-way or public sewer easement and adjacent to the parcel.
The service lateral cannot cross an adjacent parcel.
STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY
■ Each parcel shall be provided with an individual connection to a public storm conveyance or
an approved private on-site stormwater disposal system approved by the City, with
, �
� , f .
stormwater discharging into Tract"B" and in accordance with current CWS Design and
Construction Standards.
■ The Developer shall provide a water quality facility to treat all impervious surfaces being
constructed or preserved as part of this development or pay a fee-in-lieu of constructing a
water quality facility, as approved by the City, in accordance with CWS Design and
Construction Standards.
SENSITIVE AREA
■ Sensitive areas have been identified on this site. CWS has issued a Service Provider Letter
(SPL), File No. OS-005130 for this site, dated March 1, 2006 (Tax/Map 1 S135DB08400).
■ Development of this site shall be in accordance with all provisions and conditions of SPL No.
OS-005130.
EROSION CONTROL
■ Provide erosion control in accordance with current CWS Design and Construction Standards.
✓
M����EiV�D
Apri13, 2007 ,
" � R 3 ?_007
City of Tigard, Oregon t;ll"Y OF TiGARD
Community Development Department �I.AN►���N��F'���INEERING
Attention: Emily Eng,Assistant Planner
Dear Ms. Eng &Hearings Off'icer:
I am writing in response to the Proposed Minor Land Partition 2006-00003.
My property is located to the east of the proposed partition. There are several
considerations I want to address:
First. In the site plan provided to me by the city in the application, item#7 in the notes
states that the vegetative corridor is to be owned in common by parcels 1, 2, and 3. It is
my understanding in talking with Ms. Eng that this land was proposed to be either deeded
to the City of Tigard or Clean Water Services. It is important that this land be set aside as
a true buffer and not encroached on by the future land owners as this wetland area is quite
fragile and the wildlife in this area are stressed between increased housing and Highway
217. Deeding this buffer corridor will protect this land better than an agreement with the
future land owners.
Second. Also regarding the buffer azea,on the northeast corridor of the property there is
a great deal of garbage and car parts that have been dumped there over the years. The
present owner of the property should be required to remove said debris in a manner that
does not disturb the vegetation and protects this wetland area.
Third. I would request that no fencing be placed on the east end of the corridor area and
that it be left as natural as possible.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Sincerely,
�
� ��� .
���-? -�-a��
Georgia cFadden
9155 SW North Dakota Street
Tigard, Oregon 97223
503.443.2305
_ .
MEMORANDUM N���! �'��
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ' 1 6 2007
DATE: 5/16/07 � �'�^� "� ^��n
TO: Emily Eng, Assistant Planner
FROM: Kim McMillan, Development Review Enginee
RE: MLP 2006-00003 Schenk
Access Manaqement (Section 18.705.030.H)
Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with
all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and
streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and
deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and
AASHTO.
The applicant's engineer has provided a preliminary sight distance certification
for the intersection of the private street with North Dakota Street. The posted
speed on North Dakota Street is 25 mph which requires a minimum sight
distance of 250 feet in each direction. The engineer states that sight distance
from the private street to 91 St Court was measured to be 310 feet to the east and
the sight distance to 93�d Street was measured to be 320 feet to the west.
Therefore, there is adequate sight distance in each direction from this private
street onto North Dakota Street.
Street And Utilitv Improvements Standards (Section 18.8101:
Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of
public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and
drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below:
Streets:
Improvements:
Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets
adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards.
Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width
planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved
in accordance with the TDC.
Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a
Neighborhood Route to have a 54 right-of-way width and 32-foot paved
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2006-00003 SCHENK PAGE 1
section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking,
sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm
drainage, and street trees.
This site lies adjacent to SW North Dakota Street, which is classified as a
Neighborhood Route on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present,
there is approximately 25 feet of ROW from centerline, according to the most
recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate the additional ROW to
provide 27 feet from centerline.
SW North Dakota Street is currently partially improved. In order to mitigate the
impact from this development, the applicant should construct half-street
improvements in accordance with Figure 18.810.4.F of the TDC. The decision to
have the applicant provide the half-street improvements is based on a rough
proportionality analysis.
Future Street Plan and Extension of Streets: Section 18.810.030.F states
that a future street plan shall be filed which shows the pattern of existing and
proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land division.
This section also states that where it is necessary to give access or permit a
satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to the
boundary lines of the tract to be developed and a barricade shall be
constructed at the end of the street. These street stubs to adjoining
properties are not considered to be cul-de-sacs since they are intended to
continue as through streets at such time as the adjoining property is
developed. A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the
property owners which shall not be removed until authorized by the City
Engineer, the cost of which shall be included in the street construction cost.
Temporary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de-sac bulbs shall be
constructed for stub streets in excess of 150 feet in length.
There is a significant wetland area located to the north of this development;
therefore there are no opportunities to extend the street.
Street Alignment and Connections:
Section 18.810.030.H.1 states that full street connections with spacing of
no more than 530 feet between connections is required except where
prevented by barriers such as topography, railroads, freeways, pre-existing
developments, lease provisions, easements, covenants or other
restrictions existing prior to May 1, 1995 which preclude street
connections. A full street connection may also be exempted due to a
regulated water feature if regulations would not permit construction.
Section 18.810.030.H.2 states that all local, neighborhood routes and
collector streets which abut a development site shall be extended within
the site to provide through circulation when not precluded by
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2006-00003 SCHENK PAGE 2
environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns
or strict adherence to other standards in this code. A street connection or
extension is precluded when it is not possible to redesign, or reconfigure
the street pattern to provide required extensions. Land is considered
topographically constrained if the slope is greater than 15% for a distance
of 250 feet or more. In the case of environmental or topographical
constraints, the mere presence of a constraint is not sufficient to show that
a street connection is not possible. The applicant must show why the
constraint precludes some reasonable street connection.
There is a significant wetland area located to the north of this development;
therefore there are no opportunities to extend the street.
Grades and Curves: Section 18.810.030.N states that grades shall not exceed
ten percent on arterials, 12% on collector streets, or 12% on any other street
(except that local or residential access streets may have segments with
grades up to 15% for distances of no greater than 250 feet). Centerline radii
of curves shall be as determined by the City Engineer.
The grade along North Dakota Street is less than 5°/o, thereby meeting this
criterion.
Private Streets: Section 18.810.030.T states that design standards for
private streets shall be established by the City Engineer. The City shall
require legal assurances for the continued maintenance of private streets,
such as a recorded maintenance agreement. Private streets serving more
than six dwelling units are permitted only within planned developments,
mobile home parks, and multi-family residential developments.
The applicant has proposed the construction of a private street to serve the three
parcels of this partition.
The applicant shall place a statement on the face of the final plat indicating the
private street will be owned and maintained by the properties that will be served
by it/them. In addition, the applicant shall record Conditions, Covenants and
Restrictions (CC&R's) along with the final plat that will clarify how the private
property owners are to maintain the private street. These CC&R's shall be
reviewed and approved by the City prior to approval of the final plat_ The City's
public improvement design standards require private streets to have a pavement
section equal to a public local street. The applicant will need to provide this type
of pavement section.
Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape
of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building
sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2006-00003 SCHENK PAGE 3
access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of
limitations and opportunities of topography.
Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks
formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of-
way line except:
• Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or
other bodies of water or, pre-existing development or;
• For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, major
collectors or railroads.
• For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides
equivalent access.
PLANNING
Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections
on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street
connection is not possible. Spacing between connections shall be no
more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or
topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict
adherence to other standards in the code.
PLANNING
Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being
more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5
times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district.
PLANNING
Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of
frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land
partition, 18.420.050./�.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a
minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access
easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling
unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet.
PLANNING
Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to
meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial,
collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets
shall have sidewalks on at least one side.
The applicant's plans indicate they will construct a 5 foot sidewalk along the east
side of the private street. The applicant shall also construct a 5 foot sidewalk and
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2006-00003 SCHENK PAGE 4
5 foot planter strip with the half-street improvements along the North Dakota
Street frontage.
Sanitary Sewers:
Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be
installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to
existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and
Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as
adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future
revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive
plan.
Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems
shall include consideration of additional development within the area as
projected by the Comprehensive Plan.
The applicant's narrative states that a public sewer will be extended as far north
as possible in the private street terminating with a manhole. The public main will
have to be constructed with a positive grade in order to provide gravity flow from
the manhole to the existing sewer main in North Dakota Street. A 15 foot public
sewer easement will be required over this public sewer main. Each parcel will be
required to have a separate sewer lateral to the new public sewer. If pumping,
the laterals will have to be pumped into a structure prior to connecting to the
manhole with a gravity flow lateral.
Storm Drainage:
General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make
adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff.
Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a
culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate
potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or
outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary
size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction
Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by
Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or
amendments).
There are no upstream drainage ways that impact this development.
Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it
is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2006-00003 SCHENK PAGE 5
the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and
Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have
been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions
have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the
development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards
for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water
Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments).
In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek
and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that
plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater
detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net
increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that
all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide
onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno
Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff
will be permitted to discharge without detention.
The CWS standards include a provision that would exclude small projects such
as residential land partitions. It would be impractical to require an on-site
water quantity facility to accommodate detention for three residential
parcels. Rather, the CWS standards provide that applicants should pay a
fee in-lieu of constructing a facility if deemed appropriate. Staff
recommends payment of the fee in-lieu on this application.
Utilities:
Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those
required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services
and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface
mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter
cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service
facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at
50,000 volts or above, and:
• The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving
utility to provide the underground services;
• The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted
facilities;
• All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains
installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the
surfacing of the streets; and
• Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing
the street improvements when service connections are made.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2006-00003 SCHENK PAGE 6
Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states
that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the
development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities
which are not underground will serve the development and the approval
authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-
grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in
conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-
by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a
short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the
placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground
utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by
utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public
right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-
grounding.
There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW North Dakota
Street. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 35.00 per lineal foot of street
frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 55 lineal
feet; therefore the fee would be $ 1925.00.
Public Water System:
Tualatin Valley Water District provides service in this area. The applicant shall
obtain permits from TVWD prior to issuance of City permits.
Storm Water Qualitv:
The City has agreed to enforce Surtace Water Management (SWM)
regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and
Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which
require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities
shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100
percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious
surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the
frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained
through the year.
The CWS standards include a provision that would exclude small projects such
as residential land partitions. It would be impractical to require an on-site
water quality facility to accommodate treatment of the storm water from
Parcels 1, 2 & 3. Rather, the CWS standards provide that applicants
should pay a fee in-lieu of constructing a facility if deemed appropriate.
Staff recommends payment of the fee in-lieu on this application.
The applicant shall provide a flow dissipater for the roof runoff from each home
prior to discharging to the vegetated corridor area.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2006-00003 SCHENK PAGE 7
The applicant shall also provide for the collection and disposal of stormwater
runoff from the private street to an approved public system. This shall be shown
on the plans for construction.
Gradinq and Erosion Control:
CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to
reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public
storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction,
grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates
erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an
erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City
permits.
The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any
development that will disturb one or more acre of land. Since this site is
over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit
from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with
the site and/or building permit.
The applicant shall submit an Erosion Control Plan with the PFI application.
Address Assiqnments:
The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the
City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee
in the amount of $ 50.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to
the City prior to final plat approval.
The developer will also be required to provide signage at the entrance of each
shared flag lot driveway or private street that lists the addresses that are served
by the given driveway or street. This will assist emergency services personnel to
more easily find a particular home.
Survev Requirements
The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates [NAD 83 (91)] on
two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic
control network (GC 22). These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be
of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the
coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements
to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates
can be established by:
• GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey.
• By random traverse using conventional surveying methods.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2006-00003 SCHENK PAGE 8
In addition, the applicant's as-built drawings shall be tied to the GPS network.
The applicant's engineer shall provide the City with an electronic file with points
for each structure (manholes, catch basins, water valves, hydrants and other
water system features) in the development, and their respective X and Y State
Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD 83 (91).
Recommendations:
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO
APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT:
Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642)
for review and approval:
. A Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this project to
cover half-street improvements, public utilities and any other work in the
public right-of-way. Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall
be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans
are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should
only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public Facility
Improvement (PFI) permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public
Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the
City's web page (www.tigard-or.gov).
. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address
and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be
designated as the "Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance
for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a
corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which
the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact
person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering
Department will delay processing of project documents.
. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan
for approval by the City Engineer. The purpose of this plan is for parking
and traffic control during the public improvement construction phase.
. The City Engineer may determine the necessity for, and require submittal
and approval of, a construction access and parking plan for the home
building phase. If the City Engineer deems such a plan necessary, the
applicant shall provide the plan prior to issuance of building permits.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2006-00003 SCHENK PAGE 9
. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall pay the addressing fee.
(STAFF CONTACT: Bethany Stewart, Engineering).
. The applicant shall submit construction plans to the Engineering Department
as a part of the Public Facility Improvement permit, which indicate that they
will construct a half-street improvement along the frontage of North Dakota
Street. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include:
A. City standard pavement section for a Neighborhood Route from curb
to centerline equal to 16 feet;
B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the
existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage;
C. concrete curb, or curb and gutter as needed;
D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to
convey surFace and/or subsurface runoff;
E. 5 foot concrete sidewalk with a 5 foot planter strip;
F. street trees in the planter strip spaced per TDC requirements;
G. street striping;
H. streetlight layout by applicant's engineer, to be approved by City
Engineer;
I. underground utilities;
J. street signs (if applicable);
K. driveway apron (if applicable); and
L. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW
North Dakota Street in a safe manner, as approved by the
Engineering Department.
. A profile of North Dakota Street shall be required, extending 300 feet either
side of the subject site showing the existing grade and proposed future
grade.
. The applicant shall cause a statement to be placed on the final plat to
indicate that the proposed private street will be jointly owned and maintained
by the private property owners who abut and take access from it.
. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall prepare Conditions,
Covenants and Restrictions (CC&R's) for this project, to be recorded with
the final plat, that clearly lays out a maintenance plan and agreement for the
proposed private street(s). The CC&R's shall obligate the private property
owners within the subdivision to create a homeowner's association to ensure
regulation of maintenance for the street(s). The applicant shall submit a
copy of the CC&R's to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan) prior to
approval of the final plat.
. The applicant's construction drawings shall show that the pavement and
rock section for the proposed private street(s) shall meet the City's public
street standard for a local residential street.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2006-00003 SCHENK PAGE 10
. The applicant's plans shall show the public sewer extension as far north as
possible to provide gravity flow. The three laterals to the parcels shall also
have positive grade in order to provide gravity flow. If pumping is necessary
from the lots a structure for each parcel shall be install prior to connecting to
the public manhole. A 15 foot public sewer easement shall be provided over
the sewer main.
. The applicant shall provide a flow dissipater for the roof runoff from each
home prior to discharging to the vegetated corridor area. This shall be
shown on the plans for construction.
. The applicant shall provide for the collection and disposal of stormwater
runoff from the private street to an approved public system. This shall be
shown on the plans for construction.
. The applicant shall obtain approval from the Tualatin Valley Water District for
the proposed water connection prior to issuance of the City's Public Facility
Improvement permit.
. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility
Improvement (PFI) permit drawings. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion
Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, February
2003 edition."
. The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two
monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic
control network (GC 22) as recorded in Washington County survey records.
These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same
precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the
coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground
measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north.
These coordinates can be established by:
• GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey.
• By random traverse using conventional surveying methods.
. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements:
A. Submit for City review four (4) paper copies of the final plat prepared
by a land surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or
narrative.
B. Attach a check in the amount of the current final plat review fee
(Contact Planning/Engineering Permit Technicians, at (503) 639-4171, ext.
2421).
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2006-00003 SCHENK PAGE 11
C. The final plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum
standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05),
Washington County, and by the City of Tigard.
D. The right-of-way dedication for North Dakota Street providing 27 feet
from centerline shall be made on the final plat.
E. NOTE: Washington County will not begin their review of the final plat
until they receive notice from the Engineering Department indicating that the
City has reviewed the final plat and submitted comments to the applicant's
surveyor.
F. After the City and County have reviewed the final plat, submit two
mylar copies of the final plat for City Engineer signature (for partitions), or
City Engineer and Community Development Director signatures (for
subdivisions).
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS:
Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642)
for review and approval:
. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide the
Engineering Department with a "photomylar" copy of the recorded final plat.
. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide the City with
as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) 3 mil mylar, 2) a
diskette of the as-builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF"will be
acceptable, and 3) the as-built drawings shall be tied to the City's GPS
network. The applicant's engineer shall provide the City with an electronic
file with points for each structure (manholes, catch basins, water valves,
hydrants and other water system features) in the development, and their
respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD 83 (91).
. The applicant shall provide signage at the entrance of each shared flag lot
driveway or private street that lists the addresses that are served by the
given driveway or street.
. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW
North Dakota Street underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay
the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the
frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 35.00 per
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2006-00003 SCHENK PAGE 12
lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $ 1925.00 and it
shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits.
. During issuance of the building permit for Parcels 1, 2 & 3, the applicant
shall pay the standard water quality and water quantity fees per lot (fee
amounts will be the latest approved by CWS).
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2006-00003 SCHENK PAGE 13
. � � ' �
. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE
° OF A LAND USE PROP�SAL
. � .
IMPORTANT NOTICE: THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY
A C�PY OF THE NOTICE THAT WAS POSTED ON THE SITE.
In the ��latter of t11e Proposed Land L se?�pplicarions for:
Land Use File Nos.: MLP2006-00003/VAR2006-00085
Land Use File Name: SCHENK PARTITION
I, F,mily F.n�„ ��ssistant Planner for the Ci ,� of'I'igard, do affirm that I posted notice of the land use proposal affecrin�
tl�e land located at (state the approximate location(s) IF no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currendy registered)
�t lrl S�" S W ` �' R-��
.���� S�- � I S 1 �3 S� D`i� , i� (�� ��C�c�
and did personally=post norice of the proposed land use applicarion(s) b�� means of weatherproof posting in the general
�-icuut�' of the affected rerritorn-, a copy of said notice being hereto attached and b�- reference made a part hcreof,
rd �
on the�day of y_"l/lp,�� ,2007.
�
,
ature erformed Posting
h:�.J�i�nn��.�ra�n��.m:o[cr>`,aftidacu ul��u.un};tin-:ipplicani�n��u.i pub6c hrann,�.duc
H K PARTITI
SC EN ON
MINOR LAND PARTITON (MLP) 2006-00003/ r
ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 200G-00085
REQUEST: Thc applicant is requesting approval to �artition a 34,958-square foot lot into
three lots of 8,188 square feet, 7,860 square feet and 8,514 square feet for single-famil��
homes. The site is currently vacant. The applicant is also requesting approval fc�t�
adjustment to the access spacing standard because the proposed pr�vate street on SW Dakota
Street does not meet the 200-foot spacing standard for streets and driveways on a collector.
There are at least seven driveways within 200 feet of the proposed private street.
LOCATION: 9175 SW Dakota Street; Washington County Tax Map 1S135DB, Tax Lot
8400. ZONE: R-4.5: Low Density Residential. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to
accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a
minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are
permitted condirionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditic>nall -.
APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 1 S.; ,
18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
Further infc�rmation may be obtained from the Planning Division �staff contact: Emily Engs
Assistant Planner) at 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223, or by calling 503-639-4171
or by email to Emily(a�ti ard-or.gov . �� copy of the application and all documents and
evidence submitted by or on behalf of the applicant and the applicable criteria are available for
inspection at no cost and copies for all items can also be provided at a reasonable cost.
� � � � � --� - - � � � _ .
,
.
`� Q - AREA NOTIFIED
', �r,� ' (500')
� �,� i
�,
� --
; � �
= -_ � F()R: Marilyn Adair �
- � �
_ � --
- - � R�:: 1�1LP2�06-00003
���,=�N ; sPRUCE sr (1S135DB, 8400) ,
� �� � � � __________= I
— �»�,,.�.o � w �
-- �
Q
� Property owner information
�� _ � � � is valid for 3 months from
�-- I li1�M�Nip \ �
THORN ST- the date printed on this map.
— 1f17'i�NN� �,
1 ___--__- .__ .. If1�S�C _____._ I
�� I I I
i � �
! �� . IS17S�CYIM I � ' _�
R17W�IiM
� \ I
�w 1f17Mp/N� � J—1
Q' __f I - '. � �- I
--- aios�mw� � � I
uus�no�asemql, isnwn `
W
hn�sun� . - -!/
�1fI751t1�6NI� i 161i5�Ut i I 1E175YOf6M I_
— i 750�1018� h175�p/{ ' - _�75��1N0 17511WIBi \ r
l;nsonwdo i � ^�
�maso�m7oo �knsnott �I I - \ l
M3115111l5 _ 175��1rid 1$q5tlO7f @� � `
�
. - . Ii5YM5 � .
� n �i 7 �
� i »soNaw ' �
I 15175���/��� � I. � ?flfSWi�q -�1fIfSM1!{It
tEU5��1�p0 pi750�M7�� 6115���/7�� 7i0�t � I
� �absmqb mos�lauo� �as�n swu� �snu���I� ��w� � � ♦
DAKOTA �ST ' N
uusu��6n � �s»sn��lu � mosnmo isuseuua�' --
misw u uqsmnn mosnw�n
�, �a�saufno � m�ww:N �-- � -- :munmN �, -
1ft75�Iln�� �, 13n5011oY�a� , 0 100 200 300 4C0 Feet
' 13115��BE��q 11f1ifi0�OH�0� I .— . . ----�- � �--- '
. . � . . 13D5GIB000 � I I�
131i500{ i31i6GfIi700 � m�soeroo� I .
�f1f50�07fB01 I 1t1761�Mll1 I I 1..=315 feet
w . h5175nNiN �I
� 1E1150�i1fY� 15t75B�11M0 I
I=I � aiosn�n�1 � --- I i .
mosnw�w
-- � Q mos�uroo maxw� �osnusu � m�sonnu a
� _ !(�_ 1 I
j isiosouue�� ��asoma�i
masnessu� unsoase� �
j ! auw�w�x � �
m�son:/� Q
� mosnw�n � ! � _ i i
ISASNIi1B0 Infarmalion on this map�s for general locahon only and
i, � � , Q -- - i �should be verified with the Development Services Divisian.
� _ � �--\ 73125 SW Hall Blvd I
. � i . . .. ; --�- � �
Tigard,OR 97223
� , (503)639-4171
� . �— — I . . -C - -
. . . � � � T I_ _ ��, , � � . . - - ' httpihow.v.ci ngard or us
Community Development Plot date: Mar 13,2007;C:lmagic\MAGIC03.APR
1S135AC-01700 1S135D8-06500
ANDERSEN VIRGINIA S CHRISTOPHER BASIL R AND
REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST BELINDA L
10970 SW 95TH AVE 9460 SW NORTH DAKOTA
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D8-1'I500 1S135DB-0870D
BECK NATHAN A&DAWNA R CLUNIE PAUL G&KARLA Y
11315 SW 91 ST CT 9325 SW NORTH DAKOTA
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D8-10500 1S135DB-04107
BORDMAN JUD C&KELLY E COOPER KIMBERLEY A
11090 SW 95TH AVE 11300 SW 92ND AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
'1S135DA-044�0 1S135AC-00101
BOTTLER VANESSA C& DAVIS EUGENE L&VIVIAN M
MANSFIELD RYAN W 10875 SW 89TH AVE
9055 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
15135DB-09800 135AD-014
BOYLAN TIMOTHY F 8 AMBER J DA E ENE L&VIVIAN M
11095 SW 93RD AVE 1087 89TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 T ARD,0 97223
1 S135D6-04100 1 S135D8-1040D
BUI JOSEPH H DESANCHEZ JEAN DAUM&
11330 SW 92ND SANCHEZ FABIAN H
TIGARD,OR 97223 11100 SW 95TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135AC-04700 1S135D6-08500
CASA TERRA LLC EBBERT NANCY M&
PO BOX 1082 EBBERT ERNEST E
CLACKAMAS,OR 97015 9205 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S 35AC-00100 1S135D6-07300
CA TE LLC EMORY JESSE B&
PO 1082 LEIGH A
CKA , OR 97015 11280 SW 94TH AVE
PORTLAND,OR 97223
1S135AC-04600 1S135DB-10700
CA TE LLC ERDMAN LEE A&DARCY D
PO B 1082 11070 SW 95TH AVE
CKA S,OR 97015 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135DB-10800 7 S135DB-07800
CHONG BENTON L ERICKSON DAVIS A&SUSAN K
11250 SW 91 ST CT 9115 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D6-04000 1S135DB-04400
ERVIN ROBERT 8�KIM HANSON PAUL C
11360 SW 92ND AVE 11315 SW 92ND AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DB-06600 1S735DB-04300
ESTES ALICE L HELLWEGE GARY A 8 PATRICIA J
PO BOX 230299 11285 SW 92ND AVE
TIGARD,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D6-12500 1S135DB-08300
ESTRADA KAREN GAY HENRIKSEN LISA M
9269 SW NORTH DAKOTA 9165 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135AC-02800 1S135D8-07600
FOREIGN MISSION FOUNDATION HERGERT AARON&AMY
10875 SW 89TH AVE 9330 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D6-12400 1S135D6-08900
FREEMAN JEFFREY M& HUNTER NORMAN G JR
FREEMAN KATHLEEN E 6785 SW 175TH AVE
9293 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST BEAVERTON,OR 97007
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DA-02603 1S135D&09600
GOULARTE JEAN E JIMENEZ-RAMOS JOSE MANUEL
9095 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST 11155 SW 93RD AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223
1 S135D6-07900 1 S135D6-03900
GRAHAM JASON ALAN&JOYCE M JOHNSON CHARLEY F AND
9125 SW NORTH DAKOTA D.J. STRAUSBAUGH
TIGARD,OR 97223 11390 SW 92ND AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135D8-10300 1 S135AD-01600
GRIMES DEBRA E KAULUWAI CORPORATION
11094 SW 95TH AVE 2445-A MAKIKI HEIGHTS DRIVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 HONOLULU, HI 96822
1 S135D6-09700 1 S135�8-04200
GUTIERREZ JOEL PENA KILLION JACK T JR&
11125 SW 93RD AVE BEVERLY
TIGARD,OR 97223 11270 5W 92ND AVE
PORTLAND,OR 97223
1S135D8-10200 15135�8-07100
HAHN DAVID GERALD KING DOUGLAS A
11140 SW 95TH AVE 11320 SW 94TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223
1S135DB-09500 1S135D8-11700
LACAN MANUEL MEZENTSEV ALEKSANDR M 8�
11175 SW 93RD AVE OTROKHOVA MIRA M
TIGARD, OR 97223 11285 SW 91 ST CT
PORTLAND,OR 97223
1S135DB-06800 1S135DB-10600
LACY JON R AND JANELLE A MICHAELIS CLAYTON W SR AND
11265 SW 94TH ARLENE L
TIGARD,OR 97223 11076 SW 95TH
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D8-06900 1S135D8-09900
LE JONATHAN H& MOBLEY RICHARD L BERTHA
NGUYEN THERESA T 9385 SW NORTH DAKOTA
PO BOX 231103 TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD, OR 97281
1S135D8-OS000 1S135DB-Q81D9
LEO VICTOR&EILEEN AND MONCHEK PETER/KARIN&
LEO JOHNSON 8 ELLA STERN CASEY K/TERESA K&
1325 SE 9TH AVE BYPASS TRUST
PORTLAND,OR 97214 20 WARMWOOD WAY
HILLSBOURGH,CA 94010
1S135D6-00200 1S135DA-02600
LOFTUS LAURA& NADARAJAH DEVAYANI
WILHELM CLARE 8623 SW HAMLET ST
11275 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DB-07500 1S135D6-11600
LUND CHERI A NELSON LINDSAY R
11240 SW 94TH CT 11301 SW 915T CT
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DB-11200 1S135DB-100D0
MAHON SUSAN M NICKERSON RICHARD F&DONNA M
11310 SW 91 ST CT 9405 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DB-10900 1S135D8-12600
MARSHALL SHEILA K ODAM CAMERON&KRISTIN
11266 SW 91 ST CT 9237 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D6-08200 1S135DA-02602
MCFADDEN GEORGIA J PALACIOS DIONICIO MELCHOR&
9155 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST RAMIREZ MARICELA MELCHOR
TIGARD, OR 97223 9025 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135DB-11900 7 S135D8-11000
MCFARLAND DAVID L& PALLAS DIANE E
ZHOU SU 1128D SW 91ST CT
11263 SW 91 ST CT TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
135DB-127 1 S135D6-1180D
PA N PLAT 1995-084 OWNERS SCHENDEL WILLIAM M JR
OF T -3 11277 SW 91ST AVE
, TIGARD,OR 97223
15135D8-04500 1S135D8-08400
PAULSON KEVIN J 8�ANDREA M SCHENK DANIEL LIVING TRUST
11345 SW 92ND AVE BY SCHENK DANIEL J TR
PORTLAND,OR 97223 7115 SW VIRGINIA
PORTLAND,OR 97219 •
1S135D6-11100 1S135DB-05510
PETERSON MICHAEL B 8� SCOFIELD DOUGLAS J&EVELYN J
LOUIE TINA L 11340 SW 94TH
11292 SW 91ST CT TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD, OR 97223
1S135D6-04601 1S135DB-04301
PFAFFLE GRETCHEN SEAMAN MARK
11375 SW 92ND AVE 8407 SW 58TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97219
1S135DA-04500 1S135DB-09000
POWERS JAMES L SPRINGSTEAD WADE A AND
9075 SW N DAKOTA ST LINDA S
TIGARD,OR 97223 11100 SW 93RD COURT
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135D6-06700 15135D&09300
PRICE JURREL L 8 SHERRY M STONEKING RAYMOND D AND
11245 SW 94TH AVE GERALDINE J
PORTLAND,OR 97223 1040 CEDAR ST
LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034
1S135D6-08800 1S135DB-12300
ROAKE MARIE E 8 TARHUNI JAMAL
ROAKE JEFF S 11347 SW 91 ST CT
11160 SW 93RD AVE TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D8-07200 1S135DB-11400
RUSSELL BRENT A/SHANNON R TENLY PROPERTIES CORP
11300 SW 94TH AVE PO BOX 927
PORTLAND,OR 97223 HILLSBORO,OR 97123
1 S135DB-1 D100 1 S135D6-11300
SALQUENETTII BONNIE&JEREMY T Y P RTIES CORP
11160 SW 95TH AVE PO B 7
TIGARD, OR 97223 H SBORO, R 97123
1 S135D6-00100 1 S135DB-07400
SCHAFFER HARRY E& TRUAIR RYAN R 8 TONYA G
LILLIAN E TRS 11260 SW 94TH AVE
11245 SW 90TH TIGARD,OR 97224
TIGARD, OR 97223
r ,
1 S135DB-09400
WASHINGTON COUNTY
LUT CPM DIV R/W SECTION
1400 SW WALNUT ST MS18
HILLSBORO,OR 97123
1 S 7 35AC-02400
WILLIAMS NIKOLAS
309 SE 83RD AVE
PORTLAND,OR 97216
� .
Nathan and Ann Murdock
Mildren Desi�. �roup
PO Box 231265 Attn: Gene Mildren
Tigard, OR 97281 7650 SW Beveland Street, Suite 120
Tigard, OR 97223
Sue Rorman Susan Beilke
11250 SW 82�d Avenue 11755 SW 114th Place
Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223
Naomi Gallucci
11285 SW 78th Avenue
Tigartl, OR 97223
Diane Baldwin
3706 Kinsale Lane SE
Olympia, WA 98501
Brad Spring
7555 SW Spruce Street
Tigard, OR 97223
Alexander Craghead
12205 SW Hall Boulevard
Tigard, OR 97223-6210
Gretchen Buehner
13249 SW 136th Place
Tigard, OR 97224
John Frewing
7110 SW Lola Lane
Tigard, OR 97223
CPO 4B
16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242
Tigard, OR 97224
CPO 4M
Pat Whiting
8122 SW Spruce
Tigard, OR 97223
CITY OF TIGARD - EAST INTERESTED PARTIES �i:IcurpinlsetupllabelslClT East.doc) UPDATED: 12-Dec-06
� �
CITY OF TIGARD �
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ,�
PLANNING DIVISION ���K;,s.�- ..� sct.� . _ I
13125 SW HALL BOi1tEVARD -
TIGARD, OREGON 91223 �.Jlil.L-P� OD� �DOCY�3�
PHONE: 503-b39-4f11 FAX: 503-624-368I (Attn: Patty/Planning) � � �
� Q L�11 �� � � � � � ° 0 �(0��o Q ° � (�(�(�
� � �U LyN 11 U
�� ��WV �
Property owner.information is valid for 3 months from the date of y�ur request
INDICATE ALL PROJECT MAP & TAX LOT NUMBERS (i.e. 1 S134AB, Tax Lot 00100) OR THE
ADDRESSES FOR ALL PROJECT PARCELS BELOW:
9l� � .� � �' � � ��,��/sl�.�b1� d���
PLEASE BE AWARE THAT ONLY 1 SET OF LABELS WILL BE PROVIDED AT THIS TIME FOR
HOLDING YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD MEETiNG. After submitting your land use application to �he City, and
the prolect planner has reviewed your application for completeness, you will be notified by means of an
incompleteness letter to obtain your 2 final sets o�labels. .
The 2 final sets of labels need to be placed on enve{opes (no self-adhesive enveiopes please} with first
class letter-rate ostage on the envelopes in the form ofi posta e stamps (no metered envelopes and no
return address�and resubmitted to the City.for the purp ose o� provid�ng notice to property owners of the
proposed land use ap lication and the decision. The Z sets ot envelopes must be kept separate. The
person listed below wilPbe called to pick up and pay for_the labels when they are ready.
NAME OF CONTACT PERSON: ,�i` Z � � PHONE: �� a y
�
� FAX:
� � EMAIL:_�na�c��n,��JQ c� c�sfi`�n;'E'�-
This re�uest .may be mailed, faxed, or hand delivered to the City of Tigard. Please allow a
2-day mmimum for processing requests. Upon completion of y,our request, the contact person will be
called to pick up their request that will be placed in Will Calr by their last name, at the Community
Development.Reception Desk.
The cost of processing your request must be paid at the time of pick up, as exact cost can not be
pre-determined. .
PLEASE NOTE: FOR REASONS OF ACCURACY, ONLY ORIGINAL MAILING LABELS PR4ViDEC
BY THE CITY VS. RE-TYPED MAlLING LABELS WILL BE ACCEPTED.
Cost Descnpiion:
$11 to generate the mailing list, plus$2 per sheet for printing the list onto labels(20 addresses per sheet). •
Then, multi I the cost to print one set of labels b the number of sets requested.
EXAMPLE COST FOR THIS REQUEST
4 sheets of labels x$2/sheet= 8.00 x 2 sets= �shee(,)of la6els x$2;sheet= �d � t
1 sheets of labels x$2lsheet for�interested parties x 2 sets= $14 00 t �X sets= _�
— L shaet(s)of labels x$2lsheet for interested parties=��x c�-sets-
GENERATE LIST = $11.00 GENERATE LIST =
TOTAL = $31.00 TOTAL
��
1S135DB-08400
SCHENK DANIEL LIVING TRUST
BY SCHENK DANIEL J TR ,� p� �1
7115 SW VIRGINIA G�C C I/Ll/� -S � �(r D�
PORTLAND,OR 97219 �/r�a >�/'�
� / �
q
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING -
I, Patricia L. Lunsford bein�first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Planning Administrative
Assistant for the City of;I'iga ,Washington County,Oregon and that I served the following:
{c]ue�k Apprc�niaie ESox(s)&•bw�
❑X NOTTC� OF PENDING LAND USE DEQSION FOR
MLP2006-00003/VAR2006-00085 - SQ�ENK PARTITTON
� AMENDED NOTICE
(File'.Vo./N:�m Iteferencc)
� Caty of Tigard Plannuig Director
A copy of the sa.id notice being hereto attached,marked E xhibit"A",and by reference made a part hereof,was mailed to each
named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s),marked E�ibit"B",and by reference made a part hereof, on
March 20,2007, and deposited in the United States Mail on March 20,2007,postage prepaid.
,
;
;
.�, _
'�G�a� � �,
(I'ecson d No e)
STATE OF OREGON
County of Washington ss.
City of Tigard
Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the�dayof ,2007.
OFFICIAL SEAL
- DIANE M JELDERKS
NOTARY PUBLJC-OREGON
MY COMMlSS�NMEXPIRES SEPT.252007 '
TARY PUBLIC GON
My Commission Expires:
` � EXHIBIT.�..
NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE,I.IENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER
THI�: "IZC��RI� DI•:A'I�:I.C)P1[i�.'�'I' C(�I�I�. RI�.OL-iR1��:S "1'H:�"1' IF �'O�- KFC�?I�']�: '1'I�IS tiO'1'T(:1?. TT SE I_1I1. RF. PRC)\II''17.Y
FOR\V':1I�EI�'I'O"1'I fl:YL�R(;I I_A�ER.
NOTICE OF PENDING „
LAND USE APPLICATION :
MINOR LAND PARTITION , , �
DATE OF NOTICE: March 20, 2007
FILE NUMBERS: MINOR LAND PARTITI�N (MLP) 200G-00003
.�1����s���i��.��rl� ��_LR� ?oo�-000g�
FiLE N�E: SCHENK PARTITION
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting appro�-al to partirion a 34,9�8-square foot lot into three lots of �3,188
square feet, 7,8G0 syuare feet and 8,514 square feet for single-family homes. I'he site is currend��
vacant. The applicant is also requesting approval for an adjustment to the access spacing standard
because the proposed pri�rate street on SW Dakota Street does not meet the 200-foot spacing
standard for streets and dri�-ewavs on a collector. There are at least se��en dri�-ewa�-s within 200 feet
of the proposed private street.
LOCATION: 9175 SW Dakota Street;Washington County Tas�7ap 1S135DB,Tax Lot 8400.
ZONE: R-4.5: l.o�v Densin- Residenrial. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached
single-family� homes with or without accessory residenrial units at a ininimum lot size of 7,500 syuare
feet. Duple�es and attached single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some ci�-ic and
insrituuonal uses are also pertnitted conditionall�-.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Communin- Development Code Chapters 18.370, 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.745,
18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS:
Prior to the Cin� mal:ing an�- decision on the _�pplication, �-ou are hereb�- pro�-ided a fourteen (1-�) da�- period to submit �vrirten
comments on the applicadon to die Cih-. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON APRIL 3. 2007.
�ll comments should be directed to �milt-Eng.:lssistatit Planner (�:2712� in the Planning Division at the Cin• of 1�igard, 13125 S��G'
Hall Boule��ard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of 'I'igard U�� telephone at 503-639-4171 or b�- e-mail to
Em ily�,tiQard-or gov
ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE
DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION-
MAKING PROCESS
TH}�: (;I"11' OF 1'IGl�RD .�PPRECI���TES RECEIVING COi��i�'�LENTS .�ND �'.A].l�i�.S 1'O��R 11�PC'1'. (:O'�i'�IEtiTS \��Il.l.
BE CONSIDERED _�ND �DllRESSED �'ITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISIC)N. 1� DF.CISION ON "1'HIS ISS��� IS
TENTr�'I'IVELY SCHEDL�LEll FOR APRIL 26, 2007. I�' YOL PROVIDE COMI�IENTS, YOI.' ��G'ILI. BE SENT �1 COPY
C�F THF. �LLL DECISION ONCE I"I' H:�S Bt�.I�N RENDERED. ��iRITTEN COi�iI�iENTS ��G'ILL BECOtifE 1� P��RT OF
THE PER;�L�NENT PL'BLIC RECORD ��Nll SH.�LI.CONTr1IN 1HE FOLLO��'ING INFORI�f.�TION:
t �
♦ 1�ddress the specific "Applieable R� ,w Criteria" described in the secuon ab�.� or an�� other criteria believed to be
applicable to this proposal;
♦ Raise an��issues and/or conceriis believed to be unportant�vith sufficient eridence to allow the City'to provide a response;
♦ Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relecant appro�-a1 criteria w-ith
sufficient specificity�on that issue.
F�ILURE OF �NY P�RTY TO ��llDRF:SS TIIE RELEV�N'I'�PPRO�':�L CRI'1'ERI:1\Y'ITI[ S�'I�I�ICI�N"1'SPl:(:IrICITY
MAY PRECLUDE SUBSEQU�,NT z�PPE�LS TO TIIE L1�ND USI�; BO.-�RD OF :1PPI?:1].S OR CIRCL'1'1' CO�'RT ON
TH�T ISSL�E. SPECIFIC FINDINGS DIRLCI'I�:I� :�'1' 'I'HF, RI?],}?�':AN"1' .�PPRO�':AI. (;RI'1'ERI,�� :UZI: A�G'H.�T
CONSTIT[.'`I'E REL��'��NT L�'Ill}?N(:1:.
.�1�"1'1�:12 '17I1•: 14-1).Al' (:O'�i�il�:A'l' 1'I?]ZlO1) (:l.O�1�.�, �1�111�: l�lltl�.(:�1�(�K �il_AI.I. I�til�l�: .A �l�l�Nl�. II .A1).A(I\Iti1�K.A"1IV�I�: I�l�(:Itil(�\. �I�I�I�:
DIRI?(`I'OR'S 1)I?(:ISI()\ SI I.V,I.Hl�: A1.1IIJ�.11'1'O 1'I Ili��PPI,[C.A1'1'.1�ll"1�(>OV�'�I?IZS(>{�RI?COKD OI�YROYI�:R7'�'L()(:.��17�:U�k'I'1'l ll\ �00
I�1?I�:T O1�"1'I II�:SL'�3�1�:C:'f Sl'1'I?,_�\D'1'O.�\l'ONli I:],Sl�:V67�O SCR'�fI'1"17?ll�X�121'1'fl{�COJI\il�:'.�"1'S O]t�x'I f() Iti O'll II�:It�Y'Itil�: I�.�'1�]'17,I�.D'1'O
NC)'1'IC}?. �l�f II:D1Rl�:(:1'OR'S D1�:CIS1()� til LU,L.A1)I�RI?tiS.U,1.Of�'1'1�I�:RI�:1.1�:A'.A�'1�.APl'ROV'.1L CHl"1'I{IZI.A. B.Atil�:l� l'l'ON �fl ll�:(;RI"1'1�1t1.A
:�Nll'1'[I}: I�.AC'1'ti(:()?�'1'.U\}?1��X'1'1'I 11:� 'CI 11�: RI�:CORI�,"I'I II�:DIRI?C'1'OR SI LU.1..AI'I'ROV'I?,.V'PROV'I�.�Y'1"l'I I CONllI"1'I(>tiS UR lll?'�1"1'I II�:
RI�:()�"I�:ti'l�f�.l) PI?R�11'l�()R.AC'17()\.
SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS:
♦ The application is accepted b}' die Cin�
♦ Nouce is sent to property owners of record within �00 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 1-�-day written
comment period.
♦ The application is reviewed by(:ity Staff and affected agencies.
♦ Citv Staff issues a written decision.
♦ Nouce of the decision is sent to the��pplicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record
of propert�- located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent propern' tas assessment roll; an�� City�-recognized
neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agenc�� which is entitled to notice under an
intergovernmental agreement entered into �vith the Cin° which includes provision for such notice or ant-one who is otherwise
enuded to such notice.
INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW:
The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon b�� the Director to make this decision arc contained
within the record and are aeailable for public re�-iew at the Ciri- of Tigard Communin- Development Department. If�-ou want to
inspect die file,please call and make an appointment with eidier the project planner or the planning technicians. Copies of ihese items may�
be obtained at a cost of�?� per page or the current rate charged for this sennice. Questions regarding this applicauon should be
directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Nouce under the secuon titled "Your Right to Provide ��'ritten
Comments."
. LN _"—J � — _. .
_— � ,,.\\ -k:.'-� ���(.�������^�'���
W -----_'---
' \ILI'��N�v-�xiuni
,-�+�q�s �'_�K'i u i�-�w H18;
--� ! Sc.IIE�iI� I
� P_�RT'ITI(�N
� � I
- i � �'� � I ��E:���
� � ._'S1yy �'� � ,_�iacr
J , ���' -
� '�- __ '
� -�
-5�--�����_ — � � I
�
�1 - - � �-- -- �, ;��
I � `.
�
� �
; I L- -„.,_. • �
� , �.
/
`� N
- — � ..
�Fe� �
RG
� . A � ...... ._....,
.,�a
nmm�,,,ry wnpmanr AMrn�e r . �c�ne�r��a�,� a u
Daniel Schenk � '�faril�-n :ldair EXHIBIT
71 l5 SW�'irginia :��-enue MLP2006-00003
Portland, OR 97219 SCHENK PARTITION
Daniel Schenk Li��ing Trust
B��Daniel J. Schenk,l'R
7115 SW Virginia
Portland, OR 97219
1 S135AG01700 1 S135DB-06500
ANDERSEN VIRGINIA S CHRISTOPHER BASIL R AND
REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST BELINDA L
10970 SW 95TH AVE 9460 SW NORTH DAKOTA
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135D8-11500 1 S135DB-08700
BECK NATHAN A 8�DAWNA R CLUNIE PAUL G 8 KARLA Y
11315 SW 91ST CT 9325 SW NORTH DAKOTA
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135D8-10500 1 S135DB-04101
BORDMAN JUD C 8�KELLY E COOPER KIMBERLEY A
11090 5W 95TH AVE 11300 SW 92ND AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
_.--_l.$.i35nA-nddnn _. ------ . .._-. . �1S�35AC-00101 �-- - -. .
BOITLER VANESSA C 8 DAVIS EUGENE L&VIVIAN M
MANSFIELD RYAN W 10875 SW 89TH AVE -
9055 5W NORTH DAKOTA ST TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135D6-09800 135AD-014
BOYLAN TIMOTHY F 8�AMBER J DA E ENE L&VIVIAN M
11095 SW 93RD AVE 1087 89TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 T ARD,O 97223
1 S135DB-04100 1 S135D&7 0400
BUI JOSEPH H DESANCHEZ JEAN DAUM 8
11330 SW 92ND SANCHEZ FABIAN H
TIGARD,OR 97223 11100 SW 95TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135AC-04700 1 S735DB-08500
CASA TERRA LLC EBBERT NANCY M&
PO BOX 1082 EBBERT ERNEST E
CLACKAMAS,OR 97015 9205 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S 35AC-00100 1S1350B-07300
CA TE LLC EMORY JESSE B&
PO 1082 LEIGH A
CKA ,OR 97015 11280 SW 94TH AVE
PORTLAND,OR 97223
1 S135AC-04600 1 S135D8-10700
CA TE LLC ERDMAN LEE A&DARCY D
PO B 1082 11070 SW 95TH AVE
CKA S,OR 97015 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D8-10800 15135DB-07800
CHONG BENT�N L ERICKSON DAVIS A&SUSAN K
11250 SW 91 ST CT 9115 SW NORTH DAKOTA 5T
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135D6-04000 1 S135D6-04400
ERVIN ROBERT&KIM HANSON PAUL C
11360 SW 92ND AVE 11315 SW 92ND AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D6-06600 1S135DB-04300
ESTES ALICE L HELLWEGE GARY A&PATRICIA J
PO BOX 230299 11285 SW 92ND AVE
TIGARD,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D6-12500 1S135D8-08300
ESTRADA KAREN GAY HENRIKSEN LISA M
9269 SW NORTH DAKOTA 9165 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
,���5ACD2800 _- - – _ -- _— �s�ssnR-msoo - - -
FOREIGN MISSION FOUNDATION HERGERT AARON 8�AMY
10875 SW 89TH AVE 9330 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D6-12400 1S135D6-08900
FREEMAN JEFFREY M 8 HUNTER NORMAN G JR
FREEMAN KATHLEEN E 6785 SW 175TH AVE
9293 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST BEAVERTON,OR 97007
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135DA-02603 1 S135D&09600
GOULARTE JEAN E JIMENEZ-RAMOS JOSE MANUEL
9095 SW NORTH DAKOTR ST 11155 SW 93RD AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223
1 S 135 D B-07900 1 S 135 DB-03900
GRAHAM JASON ALAN&JOYCE M JOHNSON CHARLEY F AND
9125 SW NORTH DAKOTA D.J.STRAUSBAUGH
TIGARD,OR 97223 11390 SW 92ND AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D6-10300 1S135AD-01600
GRIMES DEBRA E KAULUWAI CORPORATION
11094 SW 95TH AVE 2445-A MAKIKI HEIGH�S DRIVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 HONOLULU, HI 96822
1 S 135 D B-09700 1 S135DB-04200
GUTIERREZ JOEL PENA KILLION JACK T JR&
11125 SW 93RD AVE BEVERLY
TIGARD,OR 97223 11270 SW 92ND AVE
PORTLAND,OR 97223
1S135D6-10200 1S135D8-07100
HAHN DAVID GERALD KING DOUGLAS A
11140 SW 95TH AVE 11320 SW 94TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223
1 S135DB-09500 1 S135D&7170a
LACAN MANUEL MEZENTSEV ALEKSANDR M&
11175 SW 93RD AVE OTROKHOVA MIRA M
TIGARD, OR 97223 11285 SW 91ST CT
PORTLAND,OR 97223
1S135DB-06800 1S135D&10600
LACY JON R AND JANELLE A MICHAELIS CLAYTON W SR AND
11265 SW 94TH ARLENE L
TIGARD,OR 97223 11076 SW 95TH
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135 DB-06900 1 S135D&09900
LE JONATHAN H 8� MOBLEY RICHARD L BERTHA
NGUYEN THERESA T 9385 SW NORTH DAKOTA
PO BOX 231103 TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97281
__. +Sts,D6-O8000 —_—_—_ _____ 1S135DB-OS�00
LEO VICTOR 8�EILEEN AND MONCHEK PETER/KARIN 8
LEO JOHNSON 8 ELLA STERN CASEY KlTERESA K 8
1325 SE 9TH AVE BYPASS TRUST
PORTLAND,OR 97214 20 WARMWOOD WAY
HILLSBOURGH,CA 94010
1S135D&00200 1S135DA-02600
LOFfUS LAURA& NADARAJAH DEVAYANI
WILHELM CLARE 8623 SW HP,MLET ST
11275 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S735D6-07500 1S135D8-11600
LUND CHERI A NELSON LINDSAY R
11240 SW 94TH CT 11301 SW 91 ST CT
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
t&1350B-11200 15135DB-70000
MAHON SUSAN M NICKERSON RICHARD F 8�DONNA M
11310 SW 91ST CT 9405 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
7S135D6-10900 iS135DB-12600
MARSHALL SHEILA K ODAM CAMERON&KRISTIN
11266 SW 91ST CT 9237 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 , TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DB-06200 1S135DA-D2602
MCFADDEN GEORGIA J PALACIOS DIONICIO MELCHOR&
9155 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST RAMIREZ MARICELA MELCHOR
TIGARD,OR 97223 9025 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DB-11900 1S135D8-7700D
MCFARLAND DAVID L 8� PALLAS DIANE E
ZHOU SU 11280 SW 91 ST CT
11263 SW 91 ST CT TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD, OR 97223
e.
135D8-127 1 S135D&11800
PA N PLAT 1995-084 OWNERS SCHENDEL WILLIAM M JR
OF T - 11277SW91STAVE
, TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D8-04500 1S135DB-08400
PAULSON KEVIN J 8 ANDREA M SCHENK DANIEL LIVING TRUST
11345 SW 92ND AVE BY SCHENK DANIEL J TR
PORTLAND,OR 97223 7115 SW VIRGINIA
PORTLAND,OR 97219 '
t S135DB-11100 1 S135D&05510
PETERSON MICHAEL B 8 SCOFIELD DOUGLAS J&EVELYN J
LOUIE TINA L 11340 SW 94TH
11292 SW 91 ST CT TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
-- 1S13506-04601 ----_-_- 1S435DB-04301 -- ------------
PFAFFLE GRETCHEN SEAMAN MARK
11375 SW 92ND AVE 8407 SW 58TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97219
1S135DA-04500 1S135D8-09000
POWERS JAMES L SPRINGSTEAD WADE A AND
9075 SW N OAKOTA ST LINDA S
TIGARD,OR 97223 11100 SW 93RD COURT
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D8-06700 1S135D8-09300
PRICE JURREL L&SHERRY M STONEKING RAYMOND D AND
11245 SW 94TH AVE GERALDINE J
PORTLAND,OR 97223 1040 CEDAR ST
LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034
15135DB-OBB00 1S135D8-12300
ROAKE MARIE E 8 TARHUNI JAMAL
ROAKE JEFF S 11347 5W 91 ST CT
11160 SW 93RD AVE TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D6-07200 1S135DB-11400
RUSSELL BRENTA/SHANNON R TENLY PROPERTIES CORP
11300 SW 94TH AVE PO BOX 927
PORTLAND,OR 97223 HILLSBORO,OR 97123
1S135�B-70100 1S135DB-11300
SALQUENETTII BONNIE&JEREMY T Y P RTIES CORP
11160 SW 95TH AVE PO B 7
TIGARO,OR 97223 H SBORO, R 97123
1S135D8-00100 1S135D8-07400
SCHAFFER HARRY E 8 TRUAIR RYAN R&TONYA G
LILLIAN E TRS 11260 SW 94TH AVE
11245 SW 90TH TIGARD,OR 97224
TIGARD, OR 97223
S
1S135DB-09400
WASHINGTON COUNTY
LUT CPM DIV RNV SECTION
1400 SW WALNUT ST MS18
HILLSBORO,OR 97123
1S135AC-02400
WILLIAMS NIKOLAS
309 SE 83RD AVE
PORTLAND,OR 97216
Nathan and Ann Murdock Mildren Desiy„ �roup
PO Box 231265 Attn: Gene Mildren
Tigard, OR 97281 7650 SW Beveland Street, Suite 120
Tigard, OR 97223
Sue Rorman Susan Beilke
11250 SW 82�d Avenue 11755 SW 114th Place
Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 _
Naomi Gallucci
11285 SW 78�Avenue �
Tigard, OR 97223
--- __
— -- - - -- - - _ - - -_ _--- -
Diane Baldwin
-
3706 Kinsale Lane SE
Olympia, WA 98501
Brad Spring
7555 SW Spruce Street
Tigard, OR 97223
Alexander Craghead
12205 SW Hall Boulevard
Tigard, OR 97223-6210
Gretchen Buehner
13249 SW 136m Place
Tigard, OR 97224
John Frewing
7110 SW Lola Lane
Tigard, OR 97223
CPO 4B
16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242
Tigard, OR 97224
CPO 4M
Pat Whiting
8122 SW Spruce
Tigard, OR 97223
CITY OF TIGARD - EAST INTERESTED PARTIES �i:lcurpinlsetupllabelslClT East.doc) UPDATED: 12-Dec-06
��
� AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING -
I, Patricia L. Lunsfo�i bein�fust duly sworn/affirni, on oath depose and say that I am a Planning Administrative
Assistant for the City of�I'iga ,Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following:
�aa�ck Appn}�.uu�&n(sl 8ebv}
� NOTTCE OF DEQSION FOR
MI.P2006-00003/VAR2006-00085 - SC�IENK PAR7TTION
(File No./N�rre Re[ercn�-e)
� .4NIENDEDNOTIC�
� City of Tigard Plaruung Director
A copy of the said notice being hereto attached,marked E�ibit"A",and by reference made a part hereof,was mailed to each
named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s),marked Exhibit"B",and byreference made a part hereof,on
May 21,2007, and deposited in the United States Mail on May 21,2007,postage prepaid.
,
i
� �/ �
(Person that Pre are otice)
STATE OF OREGON
County of Washington ss.
City of Tiga�i �
Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the � dayof ,2007.
��
oHwt��Or�a
��nr��c-o�a�oN
oow�ss�oM no.�os3se ,
�+�co�issiav oc�ES�acH 2,,20,o .
�_ _ �.
OTARY PUBLI OF ORE O
My Comnvssion Expires: oZ l ld
. EXHIBIT �
- NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION
; ,�
MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2006-00003 =
SCHENK PARTITION
120 DAYS = 7/13/2007
SECTION I. APPLICATION SLJMMARY
FILE NAME: SC�IENK PARTITION
CASE NOS: Minor Land Pattition(MLP) MLP2006-00003
Adjustment (VAR) VAR2006-00085
PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Minor Land Partiuon approval to paniuon a 34,958-square foot lot
into three lots of 8,188 square feet, 7,860 square feet and 8,514 square feet for single-family
homes. The site is cun-ently vacant. The applicant is also requesting approval for an
Adjustment to the access spacing standard for private streets on a collector. However, an
adjustment is not required because SW North Dakota Street is a neighborhood route.
APPLICANTS: Daniel Schenk&Marilyn Adair OWNER Daniel Schenk Living Tn.�st
7115 SW Virginia Avenue 7115 SW Virginia Avenue
Portland, OR 97219 Portland, OR 97219
ZONING
DESIGNATION: R 4.5: Low Densit� Residential. The R 4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate
detached single-fainily homes with or without accessory residential units at a mirumum lot size
of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are pern�itted conditionally.
Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally.
LOCATION: 9175 SW North Dakota Street;Washington CountyTax Map 1S135DB,T�Lot 8400.
PROPOSED PARCEL 1: 8,188 Square Feet
PROPOSED PARCEL 2: 7,860 Square Feet
PROPOSED PARCEL 3: 8,514 Square Feet
APPLICABLE
RE VIE W
CRITERIA: Commtuuty Development Code Chapteis 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.745,
18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
SECTION II. DECISION
Notice is hereby given that the Caty of T'igard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the
above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in
Section V.
NOTIC�OF DEQSION MLI'2006-00003/SC�iENK PARTITION PAGE 1 OF 23
. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY
ONSITE IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING DEMOLITION, GRADING, EXCAVATION AND/OR
FILL ACTIVITIES:
e app cant s prepare a cover etter an su mit it, a on wi any supporting ocuments an orp ans
that address the following requirements to the CURRENT P�ANNING DIVISION, ATTN: EMILY ENG
(503) 718-2712. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found:
1. Prior to site work, the applicant shall provide a new service provider letter from C,'WS. The boundary of the
proposed vegetative bufter does not match the boundanes approved by CWS in the service provider letter
dated May 1, 2006 (SPL# 05-005130�. Therefore, the applicant shall submit a current site plan to C,'WS and
receive approval of the proposed buf er. If the buffer needs to be revised, all lots must meet the inuiunum lot
size of the zone (7,500 SF). Otherwise,this partition approval will be void.
2. Prior to site work, the app licant shall revise the tree removal protection and mitigation plan to show tree
protection fencing. This plan shall be included with submittals �or the pubhc facilities unprovement pernut and
anth subrruttals for building perniits.
3. Prior to site work, the pro'ect arborist shall submit a tree protection program defuung standards and methods
that will be used on site �uring and after construction by the apphcant and anyone working on site. These
standards shall be included on the tree removal, protec�tion and rruugauon plan. In addition, a copy of the tree
protection plan shall be included with the submittals for the Public Facilities Improvement Perniit and bwlduig
percruts.
4. Prior to site work, the applicant shall submit a tree mitigation plan if choosing to plant any mitigation trees.
The applicant mayplant trees onsite, offsite, and/or pay a fee-m-heu at the rate of $T25 er caltper mch. If the
applicant chooses not to plant any riungation trees,the applicant shall paythe fee for all �5.5 inches ($1,937.50).
An��y tree rrutigation plan must be approved by Current Planni.ng. Only trees spa�ced 20 f eet on center or greater
will be counted towards rrutigation unless otherwise approved by the City The trees must have enough so�l
volume and growing space to allow them to reach full maturity without becoming a nwsance or a danger to
surrounding structures, ut�ties hardscape, etc. Unless otherw�se approved by the City, only two rrutigat�on
trees may be planted in a single�ackya�-d and only one tree per f ront yard.
5. Prior to any site work the ap plicant shall install all proposed tree protection fencing. The fencing shall be
ins pected and approved by C�irrent Plaruiuig prior to commencuig any site work The tree protecuon fencuig
shall remain in place through the duration of all of the building construction phases until the final inspecuon
has been passed
<If the Builder is different from the developer or initial applicant:>
Pnor to issuance of bwlding pernuts the applicant shall subnut site plan drawings indicating the locauon of the
trees that were preserved on the lot c�unng site development,location of tree protect�on fencuig, and a signature
of approval from the proJ�e--ct arborist regardulg the placement and constniction techruques to be employed in
build�ng the structures. All proposed protection fencing shall be installed and insp ected prior to commencing
construction. The fencu��shall remaui ui place through the duranon of all of the 6uilding construction phases,
until the final inspection has been passed. After approval from Current Planning,the tree protection measures
may be removed.
6. The Project Arborist shall submit written reports to Current Planning at least once every two weeks, from
initial tree protection zone (TPZ) fencing uLCtallation, through the building construction phases, as he/she
monitors the construction activities and progress. This inspection will be to evaluate the tree protection
fencing, determule if the fencing was moved at anypoint during construction, and deten7une if anypart of the
Tree Protection Plan has been violated. These reports must be provided to Current Plaruiing unt�l the fuial
inspection. The reports shall include any changes that occurred to the TPZ as well as the condition and
locauon of the tree protecuon fencing. It the amount of TPZ was reduced then the Project Arborist shall
justify why the fencing was moved, and shall certify that the construction activities to the trees did not
adversely unpact the overall,long-term health and stability of the tree(s).
If the r�e_ports are not submitted or received by Current Planning at the scheduled intervals, and if it appears
the TPZ's or the Tree Protection Plan are not beuig followed by the contractor or a sub-contractor, the City
can stop work on the project until an inspection can be done by Current Plaiuluzg and the Project Arborist.
NOTTCE OF DEQSION MLI'2006-00003/SQ�ENK PARTITION PAGE 2 OF 23
7. Prior to site work, the ap licant shall submit security in the form of cash or other means acceptable to the City
' for the equivalent value o�tree irutigation required at $125.00 per caliper inch. If additional rrutigation trees are
preserved throu�h the artiuon im rovements and construction of houses, and are properly protected through
hese stages by the same measurespafforded to other protected trees on site, the amount ot the cash asstu-ance
may be correspondingly reduced. Any trees planted on the site or off site in accordance with 18J90.060.D will
be credited agau�.ct the assurance for two years followin,g final plat approval. After such time,the applicant shall
pay the rema,n,ng value of the assurance as a fee m-heu of planting. Any planting by the applicant must be
approved by Current Plaiuiuig.
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT:
e app cant s pre�pare a cover etter an su mit it, a ong wi any supporUng ocuments an orp ans
that address the followmg requirements to the CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION, ATTN: EMILY ENG
(503) 718-2712. The cover letter shall cleariy identify where in the submittal the required information is found:
8. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall indicate all street trees (on the street and utility
improvement plans) alon the pn_vate street and frontage on SW North Dakota Street. Trees shall be chosen
from the Cat�s street tree�t. The applicant shall include the trees'size and species. Size and spacing of street
trees shall be as stated in Code Section 18.745.040.G2.
The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supportin� gdocuments and/or plans
that address the }ollowin requirements to the ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, ATTN: HIM
MCMILLAN 503-639-4171, �XT 2642. The cover letter shall cleariy identify where in the submittal the
required inforniation is found:
9. A Public Facility Improvement (PFI) pernlit is required for this roject to cover half-street improvements,
public utilities and any other work in the pubhc nght-of-way. S� (6�sets of detailed public improvement plans
shall be submitted for review to the Engineenng Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any
drawin�s required by the Buildin Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements.
Public acility Improvement (PF permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design
Standards,which are available at 'ty Hall and the Cat�s web page (www.tigard-or.gov).
10. The PFI pernut plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and tele�phone number of the
individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Pernuttee", and who wiIl provide the financial
assurance for the public improvements. For example,specifyif the entityu a corporation,hmited partnership,
LLC,etc. Also spec�fy the state witlun which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate
contact person. Failure to provide accurate inforn�ation to the Engineering Department will delayprocessing
of project documents.
11. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer.
The purpose of this plan is for parking and traffic control during the public improvement construcuon phase.
12. The City Engineer may deterniine the necessity for, and requ�i�re submittal and approval of, a construction
access and parking plan for the home building phase. If the �iry Engineer deems such a plan necessary, the
applicant shall provide the plan prior to issuance of buildulg pernuts.
13. Prior to final plat approval,the applicant shall pay the addressing fee. (STAFF CONTACT: Bethany Stewart,
Engineering�.
14. The applicant shall submit construction plans to the Engineering Department as a part of the Public Facility
Improvement perniit, which indicate that they will construct a half-street improvement along the frontage of
North Dakota 5treet. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include:
A. Citystandard pavement section for a Neighborhood Route from curb to centerline equal to 16 feet;
B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new unprovement back into the e�sting edge of pavement shall be
built beyond the site frontage;
C. concrete curb,or curb and gutter as needed;
D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface
nuioff;
E. 5 foot concrete sidewalk with a 5 foot planter strip;
F. street trees in the planter strip spaced per TDC reqwrements;
NOTIC� OF DEQSION MLI'2006-00003/SQ�ENK PAR7TTION PAGE 3 OF 23
G. street striping;
` �L streetlight layout by applicant's engineer,to be approved by City E ngineer;
I. underground ut�liues;
� street signs (if applicable);
driveway apron (�f applicable ; and
L. adjustments ui vertical and or horizontal alignment to construct SW North Dakota Street in a safe
inaruier,as approved bythe Engineering Department.
15. A profile of North Dakota Street shall be required, extending 300 feet either side of the subject site showing
the e�sting grade and proposed future grade.
16. The applicant shall cause a statement to be placed on the final plat to indicate that the proposed private street
will be�ointly owned and inaintained by the pnvate property owners who abut and take access f rom rt.
17. The applicant shall cause a statement to be placed on the final plat to indicate that "Tract B" is subject to a
"storm sewer, surface water, drainage and detention easement over its entiret�' granted to C1ean Water
Services (CWS). Tract B is subject to CW5 standards for maintenance and protection.
18. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall prepare Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions
(CC',&R's) for this project, to be recorded vv�th the final plat, that clearly lays out a inaintenance plan and
a reement for the proposed private street(s). The CC&R's shall obhgate the pnvate property owners withui
t�e subdivision to create a homeowner's associauon to ensure regulation of mauitenance for the street(s). The
applicant shall submit a copy of the CC',&R's to the Enguieeruig Department (Kim McMillan) pnor to
approval of the final plat.
19. The a licant's construction drawings shall show that the pavement and rock section for the proposed private
street�s�shall meet the Cit�s public street standard for a local residential street.
20. The applicant's plans shall show the public sewer extension as far north as possible to provide ravity flow.
The three laterals to the parcels shall also have positive grade in order to provide gravity flow. I�pumpu�g is
necessary from the lots a structure for each parcel shall be u�stall prior to connecting to the public manhole. A
15 foot public sewer easement shall be provided over the sewer maui.
21. The applicant shall provide.a flow dissipater for the roof nuioff from each home prior to discharging to the
vegetated corridor area. Tlvs shall be shown on the plans for construction.
22. The applicant shall provide for the collection and disposal of stormwater runoff from the private street to an
approved public system. T�vs shall be shown on the plans for construction.
23. The applicant shall obtain a proval from the Tualatin Valley Water District for the proposed water connection
pnor to�ssuance of the Cit�s Pubhc Facility Improvement pernut.
24. An erosion control plan shall be�rovided as part of the Public Faciliry Improvement (PFI) erniit drawings.
The plan shall conform to the Erosion Prevention and Sediment C:ontrol Design and �anrung Manual,
February 2003 edition."
25. The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to the Cit�s
global positioning system (GPS)�geodetic control network (GC 22) as recorded in Washington County survey
records. These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as requu-ed for the
subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates the plat shall contaul the scale factor to convert
ground measurements to gnd measurements and the ang�e from north to grid north. These coordinates can
be established by:
. GPS tie networked to the Cat�s GPS survey.
. By random traverse using conventional surveyuig methods.
26. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements:
A. Submit for City review four (4) pap er copies of the final plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to
practice in Oregon and necessarydata or narrative.
B. Attach a check in t�e amount of the current final plat review fee (Contact Planning/Engineering Pernut
Techrucians,at (503) 639-4171,ext.2421).
NOTIC�OF DEQSION MLI'2006-00003/SQ�ENK PARTITTON PAGE 4 OF 23
C The final plat and data or natrative shall be drawn to the ininunum standards set forth by the Oregon
Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05),Washin�ton County,and bythe City of Tigard.
D. The right-of-way dedication for North Dakota Street providing 27 feet from centerline shall be made
on the final plat.
E. NOTE: Washin on C:ountywill not.begin their review of the final plat until theyreceive notice from
the Engineering �epartment uidicatu-ig that the City has reviewed the fuzal plat and submitted
comments to the appIicant's surveyor.
F. After the Caty and C.�oun have reviewed the final plat, submit two mylar copies of the final plat for
City Enguieer s�gnature�for partitions), or City Engineer and Communiry Development Director
signatures (for subdivisions).
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF SITE Oft BLJILDING PERMITS:
e app icant s pre.pare a cover etter an su mrt it, a on wi any suppotting ocuments an orp ans
that address the followin� requirements to the CURRENT P�ANNING DIVISION, ATTN: EMILY ENG
503-718-2712. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found:
27. Prior to receiving a buildin �ernlit, the applicant/owner shall record a deed restriction to the effect that any
existing tree greater than 1�' diameter may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to,a
certified arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in
accordance with this decision should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree.
The applicant shall repare a cover letter and submit it, alon with any su ortin documents and/or lans
that address the �ollowing requirements to the ENG�EERING �EP�TMENT, ATTN: �M
MCMILLAN 503-639-4171, EXT 2642. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the
required information is found:
28. Prior to issuance of building pernzits, the applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with a
"photomylar" copy of the recorded f inal plat.
29. Prior to issuance of building pernuts the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the public
improvements as follows: I) 3 mi� mylar, 2) a diskette of the as-builts in "DWG" format, if available;
otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable and 3) the as-built drawings shall be tied to the Cit�s GPS network The
applicant's engineer shall provide t�ie City with an electronic file with points for each structure (manholes,
catch basins, water valves, hydrants and other water system features) in the development, and the�r respective
X and Y State Plane Coordu7ates,referenced to NAD 83 (91).
30. The applicant shall provide signage at the entrance of the private street that lists the addresses that are served
by the given street.
31. The applicant shall either place the e�sting overhead utility lines along SW Nonh Dakota Street under�round
as a pan of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the
frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $35.00 per lineal foot. If the fee opuon �s
chosen,the amount will be $1,925.00 and it shall be paid priorto issuance of building pernzits.
32. During issuance of the buildin perniit for Parcels 1, 2 &3, the applicant shall pay the standard water quality
and water quantityfees per lot(fee amounts will be the latest approved byCWS).
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO A FINAL INSPECTION:
e a picant s prepare a cover etter an su mit it, a on wi any supporting ocuments an orp ans
that a�dress the followm� requirements to the CURRENT �ANNING DIVISION, ATTN: EMILY ENG
503-718-2712. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found:
33. Prior to a final inspection, the Pro�ect Arborist shall submit a final certification indicating the elements of the
Tree Protection Plan were followe� and that all rernainirig trees on the site are healthy,stable and viable in their
modif ied growing environment.
34. Prior to a final inspection, a member of the planning staff will visit the site to ensure that the development is in
conforcnance with this decision.
NOTTC� OF DEQSION MLI'200�00003/SQ-3ENK PARTITION PAGE 5 OF 23
THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS OF THE
EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION NOTED UNDER THE PROC�SS AND APPEAL SECI'ION
OF THIS DECISION.
SECTION III. BACKGROLJND INFORMATION
Site Inforn�ation:
The propose partition is located on SW North Dakota Street, west of SW 93`� Avenue and just south of I�'ighway
217. The T-shaped vacant lot is 0.8 acre (34,958 square feet) and backs up to a wetland. It was origulally part of the
Ashbrook Farm subdivision of 1907. The site is relatively flat,sloping downward toward the wetland about 3% to the
northwest and about 4% to the northeast. The northern portion of the site �s heavily vegetated with shrubs and trees.
Single familyhomes surround the site to the west,east and south.
Pro osal Descri tion:
e apP �cant requests approval to partition the site into three lots of 8,188 square feet, 7,860 square feet and 8,514
square }eet for sulgle-family homes. The applicant also requests approval for an adjustment to the access spacin
standard because the proposed private street on SW North Dakota Street does not meet the 200-foot spacing standar�
for streets and driveways on a collector. However, an application for an adjustment�s not required because SW North
Dakota Street is a neighborhood route.
SECTION IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Staff sent notice to all property owners within 500 feet and received two corrunents. Full comments are included in the
land use file MLP2006-00003. Below is a sununary of each comment and staff's response:
COMI��NT: �ne neighbor wrote of her concerns regarding traffic,wildlife,trees and enjoyment of her own property.
Fust, t ee more homes in the area will increase traffic. With the lack of sidewalks and low v�sibility at rught,
pedestrians will be in more dan�ger than they already are. The neighbor suggested speed bumps to calm traffic. Second,
removal of trees on the site wiIl disturb the existing wetland habitat and wildlife, as well as remove some of the noise
buffer from Highway217. Third,the neighbor has experienced draina�e problems in the past because of the proximity
to wetlands. More development and removal of trees would not help this situation. The neighbor urges that the roots
of remaining trees be protected. Fourth and lastly, the neighbor requests that a wood fence that matches the existing
fence be constructed to prevent residents of the proposed partition from using the access easement for the neighbonng
lots.
RESPONSE: Concerning traffic and lack of sidewalks,the applicants have been required to construct a sidewalk along
t e partition's frontage on SW North Dakota Street. The Ciry does not re uire speed bumps through land use review.
Citizens may request them through the Capital Improvement Program �QP) by contactuig the Cit�s QP group.
Concernin,g trees,the applicant proposes to save 5 out of 7 trees over 12 inches in diameter and is reqwred to rrutigate.
Any trees ui the vege�tated corndor will remain as they are. The applicant or developer shall comply anth the Cit�s tree
protecuon code, which requu-es tree protection fenculg to protect the cntical root zone. Concernuig drainage, the
applicant is reqwred to follow Clean Water Services and City standards. The applicant must provide for collection and
dLSposal of stormwater nuioff from the pnvate street to an approved public system. A flow dissipater is required for
the roof runoff before it discharges into the vegetated corridor. Concerrung a fence,the Citycan orilyrequu-e a fence or
hedge through the partition process when a proposed driveway is witlun 10 feet of an ex�sung lot. In this case, the
applicants are proposulg a pnvate street that is not wrthui 10 feet of the neighbor's propertyline.
CONIlVIENT: Another neighbor wrote of her concerns regarding the vegetative buffer required by C�ean Water
Services (CWS). She urged the City to reqwre the buffer to be deeded to the Ciry or C1ean Water Services (C,'WS) to
protect the area from encroachment from f-uture propertyowners. In addition,she observed that there is a g�reat deal of
car parts and garbage that has been dumped in the northeast corner of the property. The neighbor suggested the owner
be required to remove this debris in a maiuier that protects the wetland and does not disturb the vegetation. Lastly,she
requested that no fencing be placed on the east endof the vegetative buffer so that it remains as natural as possible.
NOTTC� OF DEQSION MLI'2006-00003/SQ-�ENK PARTITION PAGE 6 OF 23
_ RESPONSE: CW5 requires the sensitive area to be protected with a 50-foot vegetative buffer that will be put in a
private tract and maintained per CWS standards. Per G�, the applicant is regu.ired to dedicate an easement over the
entire buffer to either the Caty or C,'WS. C,'WS does requ� ire fenculg between the development and outer limits of the
buf f er. However,this f encing will not be on the side of the neighbor's property.
SECTION V. APPLICABLE RE VIE W CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Land Partitions (18.420�
Approval Criteria(18.420.050.A):
1. The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations;
The proposed partition complies or can be made to comp�ly with all statutory and ordinance requirements and
regulauons as demonstrated by the analysis contained within this adinuustrative dec�sion and through the unposition of
conditions of approval. Provided all conditions of approval are satisfied as part of the development and bwlduig
process,this cntenon�s met.
2.There are adequate public facilities available to serve the proposal;
Public f acilities are discussed in detail later in this decision under Street & Utiliry Improvement Standards (Chap ter
18.810). Based on the analysis provided therein,adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposal. Therefore,
this cntenon is met.
3. All proposed improvements meet City and applicable agency standards;and
The public facilities and proposed u� n�rovements are discussed in the Public Faciliry Concerns section of this decision.
Conditions of approval will ensure that all proposed improvements meet C�ty and agency standards. Improvements
will be reviewed as part of the pernut process and dunng construction, at which time the appropnate review authority
will ensure that City and applicable agency standards are met. Based on the analysis in th�s decision, this criterion �s
met.
4. All proposed lots conform to the specific requirements below:
(a) The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning
district
The widths of the building envelope area for Parcels 1,2 and 3 are 69 feet,81 feet and 66 feet, respectively. Therefore,
each new lot exceeds the standard of 50 feet.
(b) The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning distric� In the case of a flag lot, the accessway
may not be included in the lot area.
The lot areas for Parcels 1, 2 and 3 are 8,188 SF, 7,860 SF and 8,514 SF. Therefore, all parcels meet the m;n;mum lot
area of 7,500 SF.
�c) Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet or have a
egally recorded minimum 15-foot wide access easement
Parcel 1 will have 17.5 feet of fronta e on SW North Dakota Street as well as 112.88 feet of frontage on the private
street. Parcel 2 will have 20 feet of�rontage on the private street. Parcel 3 will have 17.5 feet of frontage on SW
North Dakota Street as well as 112.83 feet ot frontage on the private street.. Therefore, all parcels meet the rrunixnum
f rontage of 15 f eet.
(d) Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district
Setbacks will meet muiimum requirements,as shown on the site plan and indicated later in this decision.
(e) When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard, provided
that no side yard is less than 10 feet Stiuctures shall generally be located so as to maacimize separat�on from
existing structures.
NOTTCE OF DEQSION MLI'2006-00003/SQ-IENK PARTTTTON PAGE 7 OF 23
None of the parcels are fla lots. While Parcels 1 and 2 appear to have "flag poles," they do not meet the definition of
� "flag lot" (in Chapter 18.1�0) because their "poles" do not serve as access dnves. Therefore, this criterion does not
aPPIY
�fl A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an accessway
is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accorciance with Sections 18.745.040. Screening may also be
required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to pmvide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed
development
Wfule there is a 17.5 foot strip of land between both sides of the private street and the neighboring lots,the applicant
has indicated that screening will be provided.
(g) The fire district may rec�uire the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway would have
a detrimental effect on fire-�ighting capabilities.
Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue did not indicate that the length of the proposed driveway would have a detrimental
effect on fire-tighting capabilities.
(h) Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one lot, a reciprocal easement which will
ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map.
The applicant is proposing a private street to serve three lots. Therefore,this criterion does not apply.
5. Any access way shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.705,Access,Egress and Circulation.
As shown later in this decision under"Access, Egress and Circulation (18.705)," the standards in Chapter 18J05 have
been met.
6. Where landfill and/or development is allowed witlun or adjacent to the one-hundred year floodplain, the
city shall reguire considerat�on of the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoirung and
witlun the tIoodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the constn►ction of a
pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway
plan.
The proposed partition is not adjacent to or in the one-hundred year floodplain, although it is close. The nearest
floodplaui is about 440 feet away from the partition site. The highest elevation of the nearest floodplain is 160 feet.
The lowest elevation of the pa.rtition srte is 180 feet. Because the partiuon site �s not adjacent to or in the floodplain,
this criterion does not apply.
7. An application for a variance to the standa�s prescribed in this chapter shall be made in accordance with
Chapter 18.370,Variances and Adjustments. The applications forthe pamtion and variance(s)/adjustment(s)
will be processed concurnendy.
The applicant requests an ad'ustment to the access spacin� standard for the proposed private street on SW North
Dakota Street. �Iowever, st� found that the adjustment �s not necessary;theretore,the applicant will be refunded the
application fee. The applicant has not requested other adjustments.
FINDING: All approval criteria for the proposed partition have been met.
NOTIC�OF DEQSION MLP200�00003/SC�IENK PAR'ITTION PAGE 8 OF 23
Residential ZoninQ Districts (18.510�
Development standards in residential zoning districts are contained in Table 18.510.2. Below is a comparison
of the development standards and the proposed dimensions:
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS and PROPOSED DIMENSIONS
R-4.5 Pamel 1 Parrel2 Parcel3
Standa�is Pro osed Pro osed Pro osed
Muiunum I.ot Size
-Detached unit 7,500 sq.ft. 8,188 sq.ft. 7,860 sq.ft. 8,514 sq.ft.
Average Muutnum Lot Width
-Detached unit lots 50 ft. 69 ft. 81 ft. 66 ft.
Minimum Setbacks
-Front yan-i 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft.
-Side facing street on comer&tlu-ough lou 15 ft. NA NA NA
-Side yani 5 ft. NA 5 fr. 5 ft.
-Rear yard 15 ft. 5 fc. 5 ft. 5 ft.
-Distance between propertyline and front of garage 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft.
-Side Yard Setbacks for Fla Lots C 18.420 10 ft. NA NA NA
Ma�num Height 30 ft. Can be met Gzn be met Gzn be met
Maxiinum He� ht for Fla Lou C 18.420 25 ft. Can be met Can be met Can be met
FINDING: As shown in the comparison table above,development standards have been met or can be met.
Access,Egress and Cir�culation(18.705�
Chapter 18.705 establishes standards and regulations for safe and efficient vehicle access and egress on a site
and}or general cimulation within the site.
General Provisions (18.705.030):
A. Continuing obli�ation of property owner. The provisions and maintenance of access and egress stipulated
in this tide are cont�nuing reqi.urements for the use of any structure or parcel of real property in the City.
The applicant shall have the continuing obligation to maintain access and egress in conforrr�nce with the Code and
this dec�sion.
B. Access plan requirements.
No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and_app roved as provided by this
chapter that show how access, egress and ci�ulation requirements are to be iuIfilled. The applicant shall
submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about tlus submission
requirement
The applicant has submitted a site plan showing how access, egress and circulation requirements will be fulfilled.
Theretore,th�s cntenon�s met.
G Joint access.
Owners of two or more uses, stiuctures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and
egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the
combined requirements as designated in tlus tide, provided: Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in
the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the �oint use; and Copies of the deeds,
easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City.
The a�plicant does not propose joint access, nor is it required. All lots will have direct access to a private street.
There ore,th�s cntenon does not apply.
D. Public street access.
All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.030I shall connect direcdy with
a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required
standards on a continuous basis.
NOTIC�OF DEQSION MLI'200fr00003/SQ�ENK PARTTTION PAGE 9 OF 23
' All parceLs will connect direc�tly t�o a private street. As required by the City, owners will be sub'ect to Codes,
Covenants and Restrictions (C�C;SzR's), which will include a maultenance plan for the private street. �erefore, this
cntenon is met.
E. Curb Cuts. Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030N.
Curb curs shall be in accordance with 18.810.030.N and will be reviewed prior to PFI perrnit issuance. Therefore,this
criterion will be met.
F. Re uired walkwa location. On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the standards in 18.705.030.F.1
throug 4.
The walkway criteria apply to commercial, institutional, industrial and multi-family uses. The proposed partition is for
single-family detached homes. Therefore,the walkway reqi.urements do not apply.
G. Inadequate or hazardous access.
(1) Applications for building permits shall be referned to the Commission for review when, in the opinion of
the I�rector, the access proposed would cause or increase existing hazardous traffic conditions; or would
provide inadequate access for emergency vehicles; or would in any other way cause hazardous conditions to
exist which would constitute a clear and present danger to the public health,safety and general welfare.
The Director has not determined the proposed accesses would require review by the Coirunission. Therefore, this
criterion does not apply.
2) Direct individual access to arterial or collector streets from single-family dwellings and duplex lots shall be
iscouraged. I}irect access to major collector or arterial streets shall be considered only if there is no practical
alternative way to access the site.
SW North Dakota Street is a neighborhood route. Therefore,this criterion does not apply.
(3 In no case shall the desi�n of the service drive or drives requ� ire or facilitate the backward movement or
o er maneuvering of a velucle within a street, other than an alley. Single-family and duplex dwellings are
exempt from tlus requirement
No service drive is proposed or required. Therefore,this criterion does not apply.
H. Access Management
(1) An access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveway s
and streets are safe by meeting adequate stackin� needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by
ODOT,Washington�ounty,the City and AASH O.
The applicant's engineer has p�rovided a preluninary sight distance certification for the intersection of the private street
with North Dakota Street. The posted speed on North Dakota Street is 25 mph which reqwres a m�rnmum sight
distance of 250 feet in each direction. The applicant's engineer certifies that sight distance from the private street to
91st Court was measured to be 310 feet to the east and the sight distance to 93rd Avenue was measured to be 320 feet
to the west. Therefore, there is adequate sight distance in each du-ection from this private street onto North Dakota
Street.
�2) Driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street
intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on ap roach
to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shaIl�e 150
feet, measured from the ri�ht-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The
setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a
traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a pro�ect has less than 150
feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any opt�on for shared access witFi the ad�acent pa�el. If
shared access is not possible or practical,the driveway shall be placed as far from the inteisect�on as possible.
SW North Dakota Street is not a collector or arterial. Therefore,this criterion does not apply.
NO7TC�,OF DEQSION MLI'2006-00003/SQ--IENK PARTTTION PAGE 10 OF 23
. (3) The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 fee� The minimtun spacing
of driveways and streets aIong an artenal shall be 600 fee�
SW North Dakota Street is not a collector or arterial. Therefore,this criterion does not apply.
(4) The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet
No new local streets are proposed. Tlvs criterion does not apply.
I. Minimum Access Requirements for Residential Use
�1) Vehicular access and e ress for single-family, duplex or attached single-family dwelling units on
individual lots and multi-fami�y residential uses shall not be less than as provided in Table 18.705.T and Table
18.705.2;
Table 18J05.1 states that the muzunum vehicular access and egress for three single-family dwelling units shall be one
20-foot-wide access with 20 feet of pavement (a private street). The srte plan shows a pnvate street 20 feet wide with
20 feet of pavement. Therefore,this criterion�s met.
(2) Vehicular access to multi-family stiuctures shall be brought to within 50 feet of the ground floor entrance
or the ground floor landing of a stairway, ramp, or elevator leading to the dwelling uruts;
The proposed use is single-fanuly. Therefore,this criterion does not apply.
(3) Private residential access drives shall be provided and maintained in accordance with the provisions of the
Uniform Fire Code.
Tualatin ValleyFire and Rescue did not indicate that the private street would violate the Uniform Fire Code.
(4) Access drives in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the turning
around of fire apparatus by one of the followin : a cirrular, paved surface having a rrummum turn radius
measured from center point to outside edge of 3� feet or a hammerhead-confi�ured,paved surface with each
leg of the hammerhead having a minimum depth of 40 feet and a minimum width ot 20 fee� The ma�cimum
cross slope of a required turnaround is 5%.
The applicant does not propose an access drive. Therefore,this criterion is met.
FINDING: Based on the findings above,the access,egress and circulation standards have been met.
Density Com�utations (18.715�
Section 18J15A20 provides density calculation fo�nulas. Number of dwelling units is deternuned by the
following:
A. Definition of net development area. Net development area, in acres, shall be deternuned by
subtracting the following land area(s) from the gross acres, wluch is all of the land included in the
legal descnption of the property to be developed:
1. All sensitive land areas
2. All land dedicated to the public for pa�purposes;
3. All land dedicated for pu6lic rights-of-way.
4. All land proposed for private streets; and
5. A lot of at least the size required by the applicable base zoning district, if an existing dwelling
is to remain on the site.
The applicant provided the following calculation for net developable area:
Gross site area: 34,958 SF
Public ROW dedication: 110 SF
Private Street ("Tract A") 2,257 SF
Vegetative Comdor("Tract B") 6,405 SF
et eve opa e area: ,
NOTTC�OF DEQSION MLP2006-00003/SQ-�ENK PARTTTION PAGE 11 OF 23
' B. Calculating ma�cimum number of residential units. To calculate the maximum number of residential
units per net acre, divide the number of square feet in the net acres by the minimum number of square
feet required for each lot in the applicable zoning district
The maxunum number of residential units perniitted is 3,as shown below:
26,185 SF/7,500 SF =3.49 units =3 units
C. Calculating minimum number of residential units. As re quired by Section 18.510.040, the minimum
number of residential units per net acre shall be calculated by multiplying the maximum number of
units determined in Subsechon B above by 80% (0.8).
The m�„�mum number of residential units is 2,as shown below:
2.49 units x 0.8 =2J9 units =2 units
FINDING: The proposed partition complies with the densiry pemzitted by the Code.
Landscaping and Screening�18.745�
Street trees (18J45.040):
A. All development projects fronting on a public street, private street or a private driveway more than 100 feet
in length a.pproved after the ado tion of tlus tide shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with the
standards in Section 18.745.040�
The applicants indicate they will be planting two street trees (Acer Rubnun/Red Sunset Maples) on each side of the
�nvate street. However, the applicant does not indicate whether there will be street trees along SW North Dakota
treet. Because Parcels 1 and 3 have frontage on SW North Dakota Street,the applicant is also required to plant street
trees along this frontage. Therefore prior to approval of the final plat the applicant shall indicate all street trees�(o_n
the street and utiliry unp rovement pIans) along the private street anc� frontage on SW North Dakota Street. The
a�plicant shall include the trees' size and species. S�ze and spacing of street trees shall be as stated in Code Section
1 .745.040.G2.
B. Street Tree Planting List Certain trees can severely damage utilities, streets and sidewalks or can cause
personal injury.Approval of any planting list shall be subject to review by the Director.
Street trees shall be chosen from the Cit�s street tree list.
C. Size and Spacin of Street Trees. The specific spacing of street trees by size of tree shall be as stated in
Section 18.745.040.�2 of the code.
The applicant indicates street trees along the p�rivate drive will be spaced 30 feet apart. In addition, the applicant has
been conditioned to provide a street and ut�lity improvement plan that includes streets trees along with their size,
species and spacing.
Buffering and Screening Requirements (18.745.050.B.5):
Where screening is required the following standards shall apply:
a. A hedge of narrow or broad leaf ever�reen shrubs shall be planted which will form a four foot
continuous screen of the height specified in Table 18.745.2 within two years of planting; or
b. An eaithen berm �lanted with evergreen plant materials shall be provided which will form a
continuous screen o the height specified in Table 18.745.2 within two years. The unplanted poition of
the be�n shall be planted in Iawn or other living ground cover, or
c. A fence or wall ot the height specified in Table 18.745.2 shall be constn.icted to provide a continuous
sight obscuring screen.
Screenin� is not requu-ed for the private street (only_street trees). However, the applicant indicates screening will be
provide on both sides of the pnvate street. The type ot screening will be Barberry (Berberis) bushes and
Kinnikkinnik (Arctostaphylos) �round cover.
NO7TC�OF DEQSION MLI'200(r00003/SQ�ENK PARTITION PAGE 12 OF 23
' FINDING: Based on the findin�gs above,Landscaping and Screening criteria have not been met, but can be met
bysatisfying conditions of approval.
CONDITTON: Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall indicate all street trees (on the street and
utility unprovements lan) alon the pnvate street and frontage on SW North Dakota Street.
Trees shall be chosen�rom the �t�s street tree list. The appli�cant shall include the trees'size and
s pecies. Size and s pacin g of street trees shall be as stated in�ode Section 18.745.040.G2.
Off-Street ParkinQ and Loading Requirements (18.765�
Section 18.765.02 .A states that at the em o the erection of a new structure within any zoning district,
offstreet vehicle parking will be provided in accordance with Section 18.765.070 (minimum and ma�umum
parking requirements).
For single-family dwellings, one parking space per dwelling unit is required. The applicant acknowiedges this
reqwrement. In addit�on,compliance will be regulated at the tune of building perrruts. There�ore,tlus cntenon�s met.
Section 18.765.030.B.1 states that off street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-
family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwelling(s).
The applicant indicates that the parking spa�ces will be provided on the individual lots. In addition, compliance will be
regulated at the tune of building perniits. Therefore,th�s criterion is met.
FINDING: Based on the findings above,parking and loading requirements have met.
Tree Removal(18.790�
Tree Plan Requirements (18.790.030):
A. A tree plan for the planting, removal and rotection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be
provided for any lot, parrel or combination o�lots or parcels for which a development app lication for a
subdivision, partit�on,site development review,planned development or conditional use is filed Protection is
preferned over removal wherever possible.
A tree pr�e�servation and removal plan has been pre� pared by certified arborists Philip I�ickey(BS CA PN 1604A) and
David Halstead (BS, CA PN 0146A, ASCA). The applicant has not included a mitigation anc� protection plan. In
addition,there�s no tree protection fencing shown on anyof the plans. Therefore,pnor to site work,the applicant shall
revise the tree removal,protecuon and mit�gat�on plan to show tree protecuon fencuig. This plan shall be ulcluded with
submittals for the public facilities unprovement pemiit and with submittals for building pernuts.
B. Plan requirements. The tree plan shall include the following:
1. Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as
significant by the city;
The tree inventory identifies the size and species of all existing trees including trees subject to mitigation. The
ap plicant's arborists have identified seven trees over 12 inches uz diameter that are healthy and able to be saved 172
cfiameter inches total). These trees have been given the following numbers: 72, 74, 80, 84, 85, 91 and 94. There ore,
this critenon is met.
2. Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper.
Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060D, in accordance with the following
standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping,
streets and parking lots:
(a) Retention of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program in
accordance with Section 18.790.060D of no net loss of trees•
(b) Retention of from 25% to 50% of e�usting trees over 12 inc�es in caliper requires that twathirds of the
trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060D;
(c) Retention of from 50% to 75% of e�cisting trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 pement of the
trees to be removed be nutigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060D;
(d) Retention of 75% or�reater of existin�trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no miti�ation.
NOTTC�OF DEQSION MLI'2006-00003/SQ�ENK PAR7TTTON PAGE 13 OF 23
' The applicant proposes to remove trees #'s 80 and 85, retairun five (5) of seven 7) trees over 12 caliper inches or
diameter base height (dbh) that are preservable. Because 71% o�all trees over 12 c�per inches are being retained,the
applicant shall rrutigate for 50% of those inches. Tree #80 is 13 caliper inches. Tree # 85 is 18 ca�lip er uiches. The
total number of inches removed will be 31 inches and the applicant shall rrutigate for 15.5 inches. The applicant, not
the applicant's arborist, has stated they will plant two mitigation trees toward the rear of Parcel3 and that these trees
will be Alders and a �proximately�12 caliper inches. While the City prefers mitigation trees to be as large as possible, it
is tu�likely one wo�d find 12-calliper-inch trees at a nursery. Therefore, the roject arborist shall deterniine what size
trees can be planted. T1ie Cdt�s general policy on iruugaung trees onsite�s as�ollows:
. Only trees�spaced 20 feet on center or greater will be counted towards mitigation unless otherwise ap roved by
the Ciry. The trees must have enough soil volume and growing space to allow them to reach f�maturity
without becomui a nuisance or a danger to sun-ounding structures, util�t�es, hardscape, etc. Unless otheranse
app�roved by the �ty,only two mitigauon trees may be planted in a single backyard and only one tree per f ront
Y�'
The applicant.shall submit a mitigation plan prepared by a cenified arborist, indicating the size,species and location of
proposed rrutigation trees. If not miugating, the applicant shall pay the full mitigation fee of $1,937.50 ($125 per
caliper inch x I5.5 inches).
3. Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed;
The tree plan identifies all trees to be removed. Therefore,this criterion is met.
4. A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect
trees during and after constntction.
The tree plan does not include a protection progr�am The applicant's arborist indicates that the project consulting
arborist w�ll deternune the protecnon prog ram and morutor the site through the duration of the project. Therefore
prior to site work, the pro�ect arborist shall submit a tree protection program defuung standards and methods that will
be used on site during and after construction bythe applicant and anyone working on site.
G Subsequent tree removal. Trees removed within the period of one year prior to a development application
listed above will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section
18J90.060D.
No trees have been removed in the past year prior to this application being submitted. Therefore, this criterion does
not apply.
Subsequent Removal of a Tree (18.790.040):
Any tree presecved or retained in accordance with this section may thereafter be removed only for the neasons
set out in a tree plan, in accordance with Section 18.790.030, or as a condition of a�pproval for a conditional
use, and shall not be subject to removal under any other section of this chapter. TFie property owner shall
record a deed restriction as a condition of a�proval of any development pernut affected 6y this section to the
effect that such tree may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arboris�
The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accorclance with this
section should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. The form of tlus deed restriction shall be subject
to approval by die Director.
A condition of approval requiruig the above shall ensure that this criterion is met.
FINDING: Tree protection has not been met. The applicant shall satisfythe conditions below:
GONDITTONS:
. Prior to site work, the applicant shall revise the tree removal protection and mitigation�plan to
show tree protection fencu�g. T�us plan shall be included wit�subrruttals for the public tacilities
improvement perrrut and anth subrruttals for building pernzits.
NOTIC�OF DEQSION MLI'2006-00003/SQ-IENK PARTITTON PAGE 14 OF 23
. Prior to site work,the project arborist shall submit a tree protection program def'n'�standards
' and methods that will be used site during and after construction by the applicant and anyone
working on site. These standards shaIl be included on the tree removal, protection and
mitigation plan. In addition, a copy of the tree protection plan shall be incIuded with the
submittals tor the Public Nacilities Improvement Pernut and building pernuts.
. Prior to site work, the applicant shall submit a tree mitig�ation plan if choosing to plant any
mitigation trees. The appIicant may plant trees onsite, of}site, and/or pay a fee;in-lieu at the
rate of $12�5 per calip er inch. If the applicant chooses not to plant any nuugauon trees, the
applicant shaIl pay the fee for all 15.5 uiches ($1,937.50). Any tree rrntigation plan must be
approved by C�irrent Plaiuung. Only trees spaced 20 feet on center or greater will be counted
towards r�uugation unless otherwise approved by the Ciry. The trees must have enough soil
volume and growing space to allow them to reach full matunty wrthout becoming a nwsance or
a danger to surrounduig structures, utilities, hardscape, etc. Unless otherwise approved by the
Ciry, only two rrungation trees may be planted in a smgle backyard and only one tree per front
yard.
. Prior to site work, the applicant shall submit securiry in the form of cash or other means
acceptable to the City for the eqluvalent value of tree miugauon required at $125.00 per caliper
inch. If additional mitigation trees are preserved throu�h the partition unprovements and
construction of houses, and are properly protected through these stages by the same measures
afforded to other protected trees on srte, the amount of the cash assurance may be
correspondingly reduced. Any trees planted on the site or off site in accordance with
18.796.060.D will be credited agaulst the assurance for two years following final plat approval.
After such time, the applicant shall pay the remain;ng value of the assurance as a fee inZieu of
planting. Any planting by the applicant must be approved by the City Arborist.
. Prior to site work, the applicant shall install all proposed tree protection fencing: The fencing
shall be inspected and approved by Current Plaruung pnor to conunencu�� any site work The
tree protecuon fencing shall rernain in.place through the duration ot all of the building
construction phases,until the fu1a1 ir�spection has been passed.
<If the Builder is different from the Developer or initial applicant:>
Pnor to issuance of bwlding pemiits,the applicant shall submit site plan drawu��gs indicatin the
location of the trees that were preserved on the lot during site development,location o�tree
protection fencing, and a s�' nat�ure of approval from the pro�ect arbonst rega�rding the
placement and construcuon techniques to be employed in building the structures. All proposed
�rotection fencing shall be installed and inspected prior to commencing construcuon. The
encing shall remauz in place through the duration of all of the building construction phases,
until the final inspecnon has been passed. After approval from Current Plaruung, the tree
protection measures may be removed.
. The Pro'ect Arborist shall submit written re orts to Ci,urent Planning, at least, once every two
weeks, �rom initial tree protection zone �IT'Z) fencing installation, throu�h_ t�he bwlding
construction phases, as he monitors the construction activities and progress. Tlus inspection
will be to evaIuate the tree protection fencing,deternzine if the fencing was moved at any point
during construction, and determine if any part of the Tree Protection Plan has been vioIated.
Tliese reports inust be provided to Current Placuvng until the final inspection. The reports
shall include any changes that occurred to the TPZ as well as the condition and location of the
tree�protecnon fencing. If the amount of TPZ was reduced then the Project Arborist shall
justi�y why the fencing was moved and shall certify that the construcuon acuvities to the trees
did not adversely impact the overal�,long-term health and stability of the tree(s).
If the reports are not submitted or received by Ciu�rent Plaruvng at the scheduled intervals, and
if it appears the TPZ's or the Tree Protection Plan are not beuig f ollowed by the contractor or a
sub-contractor, the City can stop work on the project until an inspection can be done by
Czurent Planning and the Project Arbonst.
NOTTC:E OF DEQSION MLI'2006-00003/SQ�ENK PARTITION PAGE 15 OF 23
. Prior to receiving a building pernzit the ap�licant/owner shall record a deed restriction to the
effect that any e�snng tree greater t�an 1Z' diameter may be removed only if the tree dies or is
hazardous accordin�g to a certified arborist. The deed restricuon may be removed or will be
considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this decision should either die or be
removed as a hazardous tree.
. Prior to a final inspection, the Project Arborist will submit a final certification indicating the
elements of the Tree Protection Plan were followed and that all remaining trees on the site are
healthy,stable and viable in their inodif ied growing environment.
Visual Clearance Areas (18.795�
This Chapter requires t a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to
intersecting nght-of-ways or the intexsection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear v�s�on area
shall contain no vehicIe hed e pl�antin fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obsttuction
exceedin� three �3) feet in heig�t �I'he coc�e provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall
be visua y clear etween three (3) and eight(�) feet in height Trees may be placed within this area provided
that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed. A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by
measuring from the comer, 30-feet along the right of way and along the driveway and connecting these two
points with a straight line.
FINDING: A visual clearance area consistent with 18.795 is shown on the site plan.
CONQ,USION: This criterion is met.
Im�act Study�18.390�
Sect�on 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with res�ect to each of the following criteria
when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:'
Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of
developinent on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the
study shall propose impmvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the
development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users.
In situations where the Community Develo�ment Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the
applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedicat�on, or�provide
evidence that supports that the real propeity dedicat�on is not roughly proportional to the projected unpacts
of the develo men� Section 18.390.D40 states that when a condition of ap roval requires tlie transfer to the
public of an interest in real properiy,the approval authority shall adopt findn gs whicFi support the conclusion
that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed
development will have on t-he public.
Sewer. The applicant's narrative states that a public sewer will be extended as far north as possible in the private street
ternunating with a inanhole. The public maui will have to be constructed with a positive grade ui order to provide
gravity flow from the manhole to the existuig sewer inaui in North Dakota Street. A 15 foot public sewer easement
will be required over this public sewer mauz. Each parcel will be required to have a separate sewer lateral to the new
public sewer. If pumping,the lateraLs will have to be pumped ulto a structure prior to connecting to the manhole with
a gravity flow lateral.
Water: Tualatin Valley Water Dis�tri� ct provides service in this area. The applicant shall obtain pernlits from TVWD
prior to issuance of City pernuts. T'VWI� has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it.
Storm Draina e: The CWS standards include a provision that would exclude small projects such as residential land
partitions rom eing required to provide an on-site water quantity facility. It wouldbe impractical to require an on-
site water quantiry facility to accommodate detention for three residential parcels. Rather,the G�X/S standards provide
that applicants should pay a fee in-lieu of constructing a facility if deemed appropriate. Staff is recommenduig
payment of the fee in-lieu on this application.
Concerning water quality, the applicant is required to� provide a flow dissipater for the roof runoff from each home
prior to dischargul to the vegetated corndor area. The applicant is also provide for the collection and disposal of
stormwater nznoff�rom the pnvate street to an approved pubhc system.
NOTIC� OF DEQSION MLI'2006-00003/SC�-IENK PARTTTION PAGE 16 OF 23
Parks: At the time of building pernzits,the applicant or developer will pay a parks system development chrge for each
' house being built (total of three). Because no house was previously on the lot,there will be no credits toward the parks
system development char�ge.
Tr�ans�ortation: The average sin le family home generates 10 trips per day(I nstituite of Transportation Engineers Tri
Generauon Manual- 4th Edition . Therefore,the prop�osed development ot three homes will generate an avera e of 3�
tri s er da . At the time of b�ding ernlits, the a licant or develo er will a a Washin�t on Coun Traffic� act
F e�e (��TF) f or eac h new house being bwlt total of th�i P) to mit ate f o r�a po�rtion of the tot a I traf f ic impact. Beca�no
house was previously on the lot, there � be no credits tow�ar�the TIF.�I'herefore the applicant will pay the full TIF,
as dicussed below. In addition, the applicant is being required to construct a sic�ewalk along the length of the SW
Dakota Street frontage.
Miti ated Costs and Rou h Pro ortionali .
e app 'cant ' pay a as ' gton County Traffic Impact Fee �'ITF) at the time of building permits. The TIF is a
mitigation measure that is required for new development. Based on a transportanon unpact study prepared by Mr.
David Larson for the A Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resoluuon 95-61,TIF's are exp�ected to recapture 32 percent of the
traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. The ap plicant will be requ�ired to pay
TIF's of approxirnately$3,020 (Effective July 1, 2004) per new dwelling unit. Theretore, the TIF for this proposed
development is $9,060 ($3,020 '�3 new dwelling units).
Based on the estimate that total TTF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee
that would cover 100 percent of this pro'ect's traffic imp act is $28,312 ($9,060 =032�. The difference between the TIF
paid and the full impact is considered �e urunit�ated imp act on the street system. The urunitigated impact of this
pro�ect on the transportauon system is $19,252 ($2�,312 - $9,060}. The applicant will be required to dedicate additional
nght-of-way along SW North Dakota Street of 110 square feet. The a� pproxuriate value of ununproved residentially
zoned_property is $3.00 per sguare foot, for a total value of $330. The City estimated the cost of constructing a
sidewalk along the SW North I7akota frontage to be $7,500 (includes curbs and driveway apron). The applicant's total
cost of mitigatuzg traffic impacts is $7,830 ($7,500 +$330). Based on the analysis below the required improvements do
not exceed the estimated value of the tuuiuugated impacts. There is $11,422 worth of tuunitigated impacts left over.
Therefore,the required improvements meet the rough proportionalirytest for the rype of development proposed.
Estimated Value of Impacts
Full I�m��pa� ct... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...$28,312
Less TIF Assessment... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .9,060
Less Miti ated Costs...... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ....7 830
Estimate V ue o Utunitigate Impacts 11,422
PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS
Street And Utili,t�Im rovements Standards (Section 18.810�
Chapter 18.810 provi�es constiuction standa' r-�s�or the implementation of public and private facilities and
utilities such as streets, sewers,and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below:
Streets:
Improvements:
Sect�on 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in
accordance with the TDC standards.
Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing
street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC.
Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a Neighborhood Route with bike
lanes to have a 58 foot right-of-way width and 36-foot paved section. Other imp rovements required may
include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage,and
street trees.
This site lies ad�acent to SW North Dakota Street, which is classified as a Ne��ghborhood Route on the City of T'i ard
Transportation�lan Map. At present,there is appro�i�ately25 feet ofng ht-of-way(ROV� from centerline,accor�g
to the most recent tax assessor's map. The apphcant should dedicate the additional ROW to provide 27 feet from
centerline.
NO7TC� OF DEQSION MLI'2006-00003/SQ�ENK PAR7TTTON PAGE 17 OF 23
, SW North Dakota Street is currendy partially unproved. In order to mitigate the u�np act from this development, the
applicant should construct half-street unprovements in accordance with Figure 18.810.�.F of the TDG The decision to
have the applicant provide the half-street improvements is based on a rough proportionality analysis.
Future Street Plan and Extension of Streets: Section 18.810.030.F states that a future street plan shall be filed
which shows the pattern of existin and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land
division. This section also states �t where it is necessary to give access or pemut a satisfactory future
division of ad'oining land, streets shall be eactended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed and a
barricade sha� be constructed at the end of the street These street stubs to adjoining properties are not
considered to be cul-de-sacs since they are intended to continue as through streets at suc-h time as the
adjoining property is developed. A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the propeity
owners wluch shall not be removed until authorized by the City Engineer,the cost of which shall be mcluded
in the street construction cos� Tem orary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de-sac bulbs shall be
constructed for stub streets in excess o�150 feet in length.
Based on the location of this parcel,the location of the significant wetland to the north and the e�sting street pattern,
staff concludes there are no oppomuuties for a future street connection.
Street Alignment and Connections:
Section 18.810.030.H.1 states that full street connections with spacing of no more than 530 feet between
connections is required except where prevented by barrie�s such as topography, railroads, freeways, pre-
e�sting�developments, lease provisions, easements, covenants or other restnct�ons e�usting prior to May 1
1995 which preclude street connections. A full street connection may also be exempted due to a regulatec�
water feature if regulations would not pernut construction.
Section 18.810.030.H.2 states that all local neighborhood routes and collector streets which abut a
development site shall be extended within t�ie site to provide through circulation when not precluded by
environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns or strict adherence to other
standards in this code. A street connection or extension is precluded when it is not possible to redesign, or
reconfi�ure the street pattern to�rovide required extensions. Land is considered topographically constrained
if the slope is greater than 15/o for a distance of 250 feet or more. In the case of environmental or
topographical constraints, the mere presence of a constraint is not sufficient to show that a street connection
is not possible. The applicant must show why the constraint precludes some reasonable street connection.
There is a significant wetland area located to the north of this development; therefore there are no opportunities to
extend the street.
Grades and Curves: Section 18.810.030.N states that grades shall not exceed ten percent on atterials, 12% on
collector streets, or l2% on any other street(except that local or residential access streets may have seg ments
with grades up to 15°/o for distances of no greater than 250 feet). Centerline radii of curves shall be as
determined by the City Engineer.
The grade along North Dakota Street is less than 5%,thereby meeting this criterion.
Private Streets: Section 18.810.030.T states that design standards for private streets shall be established by the
City Engineer. The City shall require le al assurances for the cont�nued maintenance of private streets, such
as a recorded maintenance agreement �rivate streets seivin�more than six dwelling units are pernutted only
within planned developments, mobile home parks,and mulh-family residential deveIopments.
The applicant has proposed the construction of a private street to serve the three parcels of this partition.
The applicant shall place a statement on the face of the final plat indicating the private street will be owned and
maintained by the properaes that will be served by it/them. In addition, the apphcant shall record Conditions,
Covenants and Restncuons �CC,8zR's) along with the final plat that will clarify how the pnvate property owners are to
inaintain the private street. 'I'hese CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to approval of the final
plat. The Cit�s pubhc improvement design standards require nvate streets to have a pavement section equal to a
pubhc local street. The applicant will need to provide this rype o�pavement section.
Block Desi ns - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with
due rega�to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for
convenient access, cin:Wation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and
�poriunities of topo�raphy.
NOTIC� OF DEQSION MLP2006-00003/SQ�ENK PAR'ITTTON PAGE 18 OF 23
� Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800
feet measured along the right-of-way line excep�
• Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wedands or other bodies of water or, pre-
e�usting development or,
• For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways,major collectors or railroads.
• For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access.
No new blocks are being formed or required. Therefore,this criterion does not apply.
Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average
lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 t�mes the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning distric�
The lot depth of Parcel 1 will be 1.67 times the average lot width (115.13 ft/69 ft). The lot depth of Parcel 2 will be
1.24 times the average lot width (100.5 ft/81 ft). The lot depth of Parcel 3 will be 1.74 times the average lot width
(115.43 ft/66 ft). Therefore,all parcels meet tivs cnterion.
Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private
streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land paitition, 18.420.OSO.A.4.c ap lies, wluch requires a pamel to
either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide reco�ed access easement In cases
where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit,the frontage shall be at least 15 feet
Parcel 1 will have 17.5 f eet of f rontage on S W North Dakota Street as well as 112.88 f eet of f rontage on th_e��pri�vate
street. Parcel2 will have 20 feet of fronta e on the private street Parcel 3 will have 17.5 feet of frontage on SW North
Dakota Street as well as 112.83 feet of�rontage on the private street. Therefore, all parcels meet the minim�
f rontage of 15 f eet f or partitions.
Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be
located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets
shall have sidewalks on at least one side.
The applicant's plans indicate they will construct a 5 foot sidewalk along the east side of the private street. The
applicant shall also construct a 5 toot sidewalk and 5 foot planter strip with the half-street improvements along the
North Dakota Street f rontage.
Sanitary Sewe�:
Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to seive each new
development and to connect developments to e�usting mains m accordance with the provisions set forth in
Design and Construction Standards}or Sanitary and Surface Water Management(as adopted by Clean Water
Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted pohcies of the
comprehensive plan.
Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional
development within the area as projected by t�e Comprehensive Plan.
The applicant's narrative states that a public sewer will be e�ended as far north as possible in the private street
ternunatulg with a inanhole. The pubhc main will have to be constructed with a posiuve grade in order to provide
gravity flow from the manhole to the existing sewer rr�ain in North Dakota Street. A 15 foot public sewer easement
will be required over this public sewer main. Each parcel will be required to have a separate sewer lateral to the new
public sewer. If pumping,the latexals will have to be pumped into a structure prior to connecting to the manhole with
a gravity flow lateral.
Storm Drainage:
General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and
flood water runoff.
NO7TC� OF DEQSION MLI'2006-00003/SQ�ENK PARTTTION PAGE 19 OF 23
Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility
' shall be larg e enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area,whether inside
or outside the developmen� The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility based on the
pro� visions of Design and Construction Standa�ls for Sarutary and Surface Water Management�as adopted by
Z:lean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments).
There are no upstream drainage ways that impact this development.
Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer
that the additional runoff resultin from the development will overload an e�ushng drainag e facility, the
Director and Engineer shall wi�old approval of the development until provisions have been made for
improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional ninoff
caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and
Surface Water Management(as adopted by C1ean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or
amendments).
In 1997, C1ean Water Services (G�(1S) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek
Watershed Management Plan. Secuon V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a
stormwater detention/effective im�pervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase ui storm peak flows up
to the 25-year event. The City wiIl require that all new developments resulting in an uicrease of impervious surfaces
provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development �s located adjacent to Fanno Creek For those
developments adjacent to Fanno Creek,the storm water nuioff will be pernzitted to d�.ccharge without detention.
The C�X/S standards include a provision that would exclude small projects such as residential land partitions: It would
be impractical to require an on-site water quantity facility to accommodate detention for three residential parcels.
Rather, the C�X1S standards provide that applicanu should pay a fee in-lieu of constructing a faciliry if deemed
appropnate. Staff recommends payment of the fee in-lieu on this application.
Utilities:
Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication,
lighting and cable television servlces and related facilities shall be placed under�ro� und, except for surface
mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets wFiich may be placed above
ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000
volts or above,and:
• The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the
unde round seivices;
• The �ty reserves the ri�ht to approve location of all surface mounted facilities;
• All underground utilit�es, incIuding sanitary sewers and storni drains installed in streets by the
developer, shall be constiucted pnor to the surfacing of the streets;and
• Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when
setvice connections are made.
Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-
lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing
utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority deternunes that the
cost and technical difficulty of under-groundin� the ut�lities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in
conjunction with the developmen� The detemunation shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common,
but not the only such situat�on is a short frontage development for which under- rounding would result in
the placement o�additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities�acilities. An applicant for
a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public
right-of-way from the applicant's property sl�all pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding.
There are existing overhead utiliry lines along the frontage of SW North Dakota Street. If the fee in-lieu is proposed,
it is e qual to $35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 55
lineal feet;therefore the fee would be $1,925.00.
NOTIC� OF DEQSION MLI'200�00003/SQ�ENK PARTITTON PAGE 20 OF 23
ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY
� IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS:
Public Water S stem:
Tualatin Valley Uater District provides service in this area. The applicant shall obtain pernlits from TVWD prior to
issuance of Cityperrruts.
Storm Water(?ualitX
The City has agreed to enfonce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water
Services (CWS) Desi�n and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which
require the construct�on of on-site water quality facihties. The facilities shall be desi ned to remove 65
percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff�enerated�rom newly created
impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and
method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year.
The C�,WS standards include a provision that would exclude small proJ�ects such as residential land partitions. It would
be impractical to rec�u��ir�e�an on-site water quality facilityto accommodate treatment of the storm water from Parcels 1
2 &3. Rather,the C,� standards provide that applicants should pay a fee in-lieu of constructing a facility if deemec�
appropriate. Staff recommends payment of the fee u�-lieu on this apphcation.
The applicant shall provide a flow dissipater for the roof runoff from each home prior to dischaxgin to the vegetated
comdor area. The applicant shall also provide for the collection and disposal of stonnwater runof�from the private
street to an approvedpubhc system, This shall be shown on the plans for construction.
Grading and Erosion Control:
CWS Desi n and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and
other po�utants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development,
construchon, gradin�, excavat�n�, clearin , and any other activity wluch accelerates erosion. Per CWS
regulations, the applicant is required to su�mit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to
issuance of City permits.
The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
erosion control pet�nit be issued for any development that will disturb one or more acre of land.
The applicant shall submit an Erosion Control Plan with the PFI application.
Address Assi nments•
T e City o igard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban
Service Boundary(USB). An addressu�g fee in the amount of$50.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be
paid to the Citypnor to fmal plat approval.
The developer will also be required to provide signage at the entrance of each shared flag lot driveway or private street
that lists the addresses that are served by the given driveway or street. This will ass�st emergency services personnel to
more easily find a particular home.
Surve Re uirements•
The applicant's inal plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates AD 83�(9� 1)] on two monuments with a tie to the
Cit�s global posrtiorung system(GPS) geodetic control network(�GTC 22). These monuments shall be on the same line
and shall be of the same prec�sion as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat
shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to gnd measurements and the angle from north to grid
north. These coordinates can be established by:
. GPS tie networked to the Cit�s GPS survey.
. By random traverse using convenuonal surveying methods.
In addition, the applicant's as-built drawin�s shall be tied to the GPS network. The applicant's eng'uieer shall provide
the Citywith an electronic file with points or each structure (manholes, catch basins,water valves, hydrants and other
water system features) in the development, and their respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates, reterenced to NAD
83 (91).
NOTIC� OF DEQSION MLI'2006-00003/SQ�ENK PARTITTON PAGE 21 OF 23
. SECTION VI. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS
The City�o�f Ti ard En ineerin Department has reviewed the proposal. Full corrunents are included in the land
use file MI.I'20�6-00003�(Schenk�artiuon). Findings and conditions of ap roval are included in the Access, Egress
and Circulation (18.705) section and Streets and UtilityImprovements (18.81�section of this decision.
City of Tigand Public Works Department reviewed the proposal and has the following comments and questions:
. Plan doesn't show connection to the public saiutary sy�tem.
. Where is the access for maintenance where the three laterals come together?
. Is the sanitaryprivate?
. What is the size of the pipe?
. The plan is very vague on drainage. Where is the water going and how?
RESPONSE: The Cityof Tigard Engineering Department has addressed these concerns in its conditions of approval.
City of Tigard Building Departrnent has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it.
SECTION VII. AGENCY/OTHER SERVICE PROVIDER COMMENTS
Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has been given the oppomuutyto comment,but has not commented.
Tualatin Valley Water District has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it.
Clean Water Services has reviewed the proposal and provided comments related to the sensitive area on the site,
sarutary sewer, storm drainage, water quality and erosion control. Full comments are included in the land use file
MLP2006-00003 (Schenk Partition). Staff has included CWS requirements in its conditions of approval. In addition,
staff found that the boundary of the ro osed vegetative buffer does not match the boundaries a�pproved by G�X/S in
the service provider letter dated May�,2�06 (SPL# 05-005130). The applicant has indicated the buffer was averaged.
However, w�ule buffer-averaging �s po� ssible, it must fixst be a�pproved by G'WS through a service provider letter
review. Theref ore, per C,�S, the a pplicant �s required to provide a new service provider with G� approval of the
proposed vegetative buffer as a condition of land use approval.
SE CTION VIII. PROCE DURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION
Notice: Notice was mailed to:
X The applicant and owners
X Owner of record within the required distance
X Affected government agencies
Final Decision:
THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON MAY 21,2007 AND BECOMES
EFFECTIVE ON UNE 6,2007 LJNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED.
�Deal:-
The D�irector's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are othervvi.se
adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in
accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written
ap eal together with the re�quired fee shall be filed with the Director within ten(10) business days of the date the Notice
o}�ecision was mailed. The a eal fee schedule and forn�s are available from the Planning Drv�sion of T'igard City
Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,�igard,Oregon 97223.
Unless the applicant is the appellant,the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the
specific issues ident�fied in the wntten comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional
evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be subrrutted by any party dunn.g the appeal
hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that maybe adopted from time to tune by the appellate body.
NO7TC�OF DEQSION MLI'200(r00003/SC�IENK PARTTTTON PAGE 22 OF 23
• THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON JUNE 5,2007.
I�esuons:
ve any uestions, please call the Caty of Tigard Cur-rent Plaruiuig Division, Tigard Caty Hall, 13125 SW Hall
Boulevard,Tig�,Oregon at (503) 639-4171.
�, . J
Ma�21,2007
P ARED :y ng DATE
t 1'lanner
� � 21 2
May , 007
REVIE Y: `�ic ar H. Bewers o DATE
Planning Manager
NOTTC�OF DEQSION MLI'2006-00003/SQ-IENK PARTTTTON PAGE 23 OF 23
LN ' - '
— � �E�,���AP��� ��:,�,��•A�� ,� Srs F�.
SPRUCE �CINITY MAP
w =_________
Q MLP2006-00003
VA.R2006-00085
' THORN S�
, � = S��
� PAR7T7TON
�
�
- w
- Q LEGEND:
— > 'y� suBJECr
I a , �' _ SITE
0
1—� �
� '� �>>
---, - ,
�
DAKOTA ST � � "
_. ____ Y d�,
J
� r . _ __ w � �
FE��, -�
, � a
U �`?�;.y .��� �'a.
j I � ----. _.�!_ � _
�•
� � - � CA 'S� _ �o . i
. � -`-�Mrao� _�- _��'_.�; � _
2 W O� I �_ �— " _Q' . �IBONITA O
� � Q � �� � , o�,� � � „�_ �.�� i�,.
�� �, w , �,,,
� . � � � � TigarO Area Map
� � U � � Q
� a
� ♦
� _ -- N
W �
^
� I —
� _ � � � - .
— � .
, —
r _ -- = I l
, � � ��� o ao �so zao 3zo aoo Fee�
� W ���
1"=312 feet
� � I -
G�'EFNe�R , Q — —: w =.:,
G — a �
� . —_ _ �
� o � --
� �
� Q � � Information on this map is for general bcation only and
should 6e verified with the Developmenl Services Division.
LEW IS LN o�`�'� ,� � LOMITA 13125SW Hall Blvd
I Tigard,OR 97223
a . � .- - - ' - � . � (503)639-4171
�C, � � � - . ' � . � htlp:lfwww.ci.tigard.or.us
Commanity Devalopment Plot date:Mar 20,2007;C:lmagiclMAGIC03.APR
o� so� so� sa Sc:��ap A 9izss.cu.�v.�n,Fo
- SCALE:1"=30� ASHBROOK F� '✓IS
• BK 2. PG 33
SOUTH LINE OF WElL4NDS AS
• DElERMINED BYALPHA COMMUNlTY DEVELOPMENT
•
N 00°41�aa•e ir aix N 88°58'39°E 200.00' —
6.00'(M)5.98'(PPJ . .
� — �\9 2, � TWO �
( TRACT"B�� B'�ER� 43 12ALDERS
e VEGITATION CORRIDOR � r^i-°ER N� � $
'�� � � 6,405 SQ.Fr. '�ER� �
m � iranEa p ys a� 8� �
q�7 \ ��7-10'OAK Zc�. �
N 88°58'39"E 200.00' �I�l 2-�a•avo �
� � �--` 81.30' � — 61.66' f
V �� 57.05' . � �
P�� i �ER �EA I �_74'OAIC p-14'ALOEF � -- ----_l�A���� �
TIMN�-�� -•
Q CQyi� —�-TAIDEF_�_� � � � � 4/ .
SOU7HUNEOF S�try77ALDER g$ �-
euFFeWOn�iE � PARCEL 1 PARCEL 2 � PARCEL 3 �
� 8,188 SQ. FT. }�� 7,860 SQ.FT. $ 8,514 SQ.FT. T
\ 3 3
24•O�y �"�� ,�{ �
GALDER 1CALDER—`� ���� N p
�, � �z��u R , Q� �p HAWfHORNECLUMP p O
� �4��E jSALD q O a0
O �� 78 J—
�
� �� �S cu°E s 2003-172937 ~
� 3� 1�"'-"t" z:cn�De�s .L.8400)
�J � g 76 � p_34•OAK � �
ri W ^ N y��` 1pALDER 7Q- N8910'S8'E 8.71'
� °C N g. 1 7s �, N 99°20'S8'E 81.29' —� ..j
�a � Z �ra�t�o� 3 � ��2� s a�msa�w 2�°3 13�� $ � . , i _.�_ ,r`a
„•,�ER r �
�� �'�'w � ��i, i
O I gI� TURNAROUND ' '� E4SEMENT �a � ."1
2
^ $89°03'48"W 75.00' � !e I K �E I�c� � — ? �;
� dr P ��`�. �— S 89°03'48'W 70.00' ' :
C5 / �'9v°" 7/ �' � 1 � �
Z i G PEAR �`� \ � � � � � I i 7
I C 4
i ; � � 4 ! ,:j
SCAIE:I'=30' DEEDDOC.NO. � � ��� � " � m � s ! :�
96-100015 � �� "� 5'SiDEWA�K � (
i •►� i . !
REGfSicRED T.L.8300 $?��� i T�i ^ � $ $ � ; : � = i
LANDSER/VEYOR s i 3� �S ' � � � 2003-074�42N0. $ °� � m i i
� i � T.L.8300 � J", � j 'C � I
� $ $ � g� $ g O tA T .0 '
� g �'� t�v�I�. � ' i. � 0 � �
REGON I g' � g �`S'' ` � � � EobE-pauErneNi" � i d� �Q I I
JULY 11 2006 2' � 2 N � S O �
LEEA SP�GEON , � 9 2 : Q ,= i
EXPIRES 6/30/08 NOUSE i �� I �� HoUSE '� ; �L(�r y I .
e � ..Z m N
¢� �
Y
PARCEL 1 � � � I r � ~ � r aono oEOicanoN � o �~ m -�p
Q 7 ROAD DEDIC•4TION J 1� 1 " C
17.50'I 20.00' 7. �oar _ -5.00� _ Zs O� N ,� .
� l 1— 's ar — s as°os�ag w ss.ao- — --- o a W m .> >.
W� U L:� [l Cn —; .�
�
N �I$ -
�� o S.W. NORTHDAKOTA STREET_ _ —
— �— �n —
�
N
CURVE RADIUS ARC LENGTH CHORD LENGTH CHORD BEARING DELTA ANGLE TANCENT
NOTES C1 35.00' 55.43' 49.81' S 45'34'OS" E 90'44'09� 35.45'
. C2 35.00' S4.53' 49.16' N 44'25'52" E 89'15'S1" 3a.55'
1.ALL BEARINGS ANO DISTANCES ON THEATTACHED
SURVEY MAP ARE CALCUL4TED UNLESS SPEC7FICALLY
sra�o on�eawrse. PROJECT: PROPOSED PARTI710N OF
2.ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS REFER TO 7YfE CURRENT TAX DEED DOCUMENT NO.2003-]72937
ASSESSORS MAP 1 S 135DB.
3.PLAT BOOK AND PAGE REFERENCES ARE T0 LOCATION: PAR7 0F L0724,ASHBR�OK FARM,BEING PART OF THE
W.asruNGroNCOUN'rvaurRECOFtDS. D.C.GRAHAM D.LC.LOCATED IN THE S.E.1/4 OF SEC.
35,T 15.,R 7W OF THE W.M.,WASHINGTON COUNTY,
4.SUAVEY REFERENCES ARE TO WASHINGTON COUN7Y OREGON.MAP NO.1 S 1 35DB
SURVEYFECORDS.
5.WE7LANOS BOUNDARY PER ALPHA COMMUNIiI' CLIENT; DATE: JAN 03,2007�
DEVELOPMENT AS SHOWN ON PROJECT NO.328-028
OFA WINQ DATED SEPlEM9ER 27,ZIXJS. DAN SCHENK SCALE: 1"=30'
7.VECATATIVE CORRIROR TO BE OWNED IN COMMON BY JOB NUMBER: 04-4148
PARCELS i,2,AND 3. LEGEND
LOVE L4ND SURVEYS,INC.
— CENTERLINE OFROAD OR S7AEET �4�5 WASHINGTON OREGON CITY,OREGON 97045 (503)656-4915
. EXHIBIT�
. Daniel Schenk&Marilyn Adair MLP2006-00003
' 7115 SW Virginia Avenue SCHENK PARTITION
' Portland, OR 97219
Daniel Schenk Living Trust
By Daniel J. Schenk,TR
7115 SW Virginia
Portland, OR 97219
Georgia McFadden
9155 SW North Dakota Street
Tigard, OR 97223
Karen Estrada
9269 SW North Dakota Street
Tigard, OR 97223
q
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING -
I, Patricia L. Lunsford bein first duly sworn/affirni, on oath depose and say that I am a Planning Administrative
Assistant for the City of�I'iga�, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following:
;�!xrk�pn.r.iiu�&,nbl fki,..-;
❑x NOTTC� OF DEQSION FOR
MI.P2006-00003/VAR2006-00085 - SC�-IENK PARTITION
(File NoJName Referetue)
� AMENDEDNOTI�.
� Caty of Tigard Planning Director
A copy of the said notice being hereto attached,marked E�ibit"A",and by reference made a part hereof,was mailed to each
named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s),marked Exhibit"S",and byreference made a part hereof,on
Ma�21,2007, and deposited in the United States Mail on Ma�21,2007,postage prepaid.
,� �l t � �ll � l�?�
(Pecson t P ared Nouce)
STATE OF OREGON
County of Washington ss.
City of Tigard ��
Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the�da of ,2007.
Y
oF�s�u.
oESSt���w
NOTARY�A1C•OAEGON
COMMISSIpN Np.�p�
MY COMMISSION EXP11�yAqCN 21,2010 '
`�5.-?:�,_�-�c�
Y PUBL,I F ORE ON
MyComr�vssion Expires: � a� �v
EXH161T A
NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION
_ ,�
MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2006-00003 -
SCHENK PARTITION
120 DAYS = 7/13/2007
SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY
FILE NAME: SCHENK PARTITION
CASE NOS: Minor Land Partition(MLP) MLP2006-00003
Adjustment (VAR) VAR2006-00085
PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Minor Land Partition approval to partition a 34,958-square foot
lot into three lots of 8,188 square feet, 7,860 square feet and 8,514 square feet for
single-family homes. The site is currently vacant. The applicant is also requesting approval
for an Adjustment to the access spacing standard for private streets on a collector.
However, an adjustment is not required because SW North Dakota Street is a neighborhood
route.
APPLICANTS: Daniel Schenk&Marilyn Adair OWNER Daniel Schenk Living Trust
7115 SW Virginia Avenue 7115 SW Virginia Avenue
Portland, OR 97219 Portland,OR 97219
ZONING
DESIGNATION: R 4.5: Low Density Residential. The R 4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate
detached single-f amily homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size
of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are permitted conditionally.
Some civic and institutional uses are also pernzitted conditionally.
LOCATION: 9175 SW North Dakota Street;Washington CountyTax Map 1S135DB,Tax Lot 8400.
PROPOSED PARCEL 1: 8,188 Square Feet
PROPOSED PARCEL 2: 7,860 Square Feet
PROPOSED PARCEL 3: 8,514 Square Feet
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18J05, 18J15, 18J45,
18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
SECTION II. DECISION
Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the
above request. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at
Caty Hall.
THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS
FRUM THE EF�ECTIVE T7ATE C�F `THIS DEQSION.
All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be
obtained for twenty frve cents (25C) per page,or the current rate charged for copies at the tune of the request.
SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION
Notice:
Notice mailed to:
X The applicant and owners
X Owner of record within the required distance
X Affected government agencies
Final Decision:
THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON MAY 21, 2007 AND BECOMES
EFFECTIVE ON JLJNE 6, 2007 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED.
A�eal:
The D�irector's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise
adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as�provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in
accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code w�uch provides that a
written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten �10) busmess days of the
date the Notice of Dec�sion was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and fom�s are ava able from the Plaruiing
Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard,Oregon 97223.
Unless the applicant is the appellant,the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the
specific issues ident�fied in the written comments subrrutted by the parties during the comment period. Additional
evidence concerning issues,properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be subrrutted by any party during the appeal
hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that maybe adopted from tune to tune by the appellate body.
THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON UNE 5, 2007.
Fo�estions:
er information lease contact the Plaruiing Division Staff Planner, EmilyEnQ at (503) 639-4171, Tigard
City Hall, 13125 SW Hall�oulevard,Tigard,Oregon 97223 or by email to emil,y�ti�ard-or.gov.
N
��E VI�:WI"Cl �tAY
w ---
' \LLP��n)(�-iun�i�;
�-_�(�'�ifi(�-i i��il;t;
= tit::HENIi ---
� P�KTITIC>N
�
LEGEND
sJaJscT
�r srrs
�>>
aK 5T ! . '. 'J �' 1
CC', ��
w .- I.
> � : ,
t��
.
n
GREFNQ
�RG
L A y •
�
�,��noa�a�o�� --- —.__ - d • . ,o��Mn�
o m $r.�Mry A 9izss.1u..v.
��� ASHBROOK FARMS
8K 2.PG 33
m a°...'�°m:....ew.a..�.
�� NMZfA'E]OO.4V _
� ^ �qq g rx�lr�wm1
�� VEGRA�ONCOf7Po�OR � �
6,IOSSO.Fi. � � .
n \ Q��.iooi�z�sl �
� NMY9EA]00 —
�� �— �`p I— �,_ ;_.w — — — ��1
v
� PAIiCE„�1 PARCEL 2 PARCEL 3
H.IAB SO.F7 x 7.860 SO.FT. 8.511 SO.FT. _
' �,�¢f'°�'' �s v.�_y wmr.r�� � I
�. �� a
�� �
� 3���. .l��
`^ � r
a� � � �w'�°� �A�..�an�1 ��..�.... ' I'1-
� -�w � � —1 � ^_��y,
1
avm�rw m + '�r ',a� � ssro+rrwro. � ' i�`
�1 r.� �a ` � i � ' I���
Z i �� �,
aov.�i.r �^° �tl y $ s nav... � �B i :�
i a a o g V I I
� o� �;�.; 8�* w 8 �v8
��iJ g �' � I � � ; �v ; �
§ �� a a o
' eoK.�wtiur � �!nac
� 4 �p� 2 �T; LL< I �
B��O�LO O I HNfI i—9 Q r �
�ZO
n�e.i �i I r�oc 7 I — __ `�� a
— �°¢m
�, ile . unam 'm'
.�e
s.w.rarrn+cwc4rA�!—————
-----�---
�
�a�s
i.'
��` rmwascaw. ��. �vnwmuvcs
ro�o..s.,.r oan oanw�rro.mn,rmn
w.nm.oi+zwwm.rm �rwm�mmar�arx�saowrr,wte[wnwrarr�
O.G�W.0 tDG�FD N nESE W P�DK
FD
��wl��OMAww�v�mwn Yl 114.M iWQ�11EWM.. 9lARMILOIMY.
pE00M MMIO.IE i.Ws
ww�:�arar��oc+.n�
mm w,c ..waas,.
s.� nwaoa�c ,�. r-le
�.o:.�my�wo�'ra.�wmrrw� �s�a� anr
�i.voau�en wr.
t�NIWIYO1QYdlOONOIY.OlObllAtl���10
�� �� EXHIBIT
1S135AC-01700 1S135DB-06500 .�
ANDERSEN VIRGINIA S CHRISTOPHER BASIL R AND
REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST BELINDA L
10970 SW 95TH AVE 9460 SW NORTH DAKOTA
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D8-11500 1S135D8-08700
BECK NATHAN A 8�DAWNA R CLUNIE PAUL G&KARLA Y
11315 SW 91ST CT 9325 SW NORTH DAKOTA
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135DB-10500 1 S135DB-047 01
BORDMAN JUD C 8 KELLY E COOPER KIMBERLEY A
11090 SW 95TH AVE 11300 SW 92ND AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
- iS135DA-��0 - ------ _--------- �S135A�oo�o1
BOTTLER VANESSA C& DAVIS EUGENE L 8 VIVIAN M
MANSFIELD RYAN W 10875 SW 89TH AVE
9055 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D6-09800 135AD-014
BOYLAN TIMOTHY F 8�AMBER J DA E ENE L 8�VIVIAN M
11095 SW 93RD AVE 1087 89TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 T ARD,O 97223
7S135D6-04100 1S135D6-10400
BUI JOSEPH H DESANCHEZ JEAN DAUM 8
11330 SW 92ND SANCHEZ FABIAN H
TIGARD,OR 97223 11100 SW 95TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135AC-04700 1S135DB-08500
CASA TERRA LLC EBBERT NANCY M 8�
PO BOX 1082 EBBERT ERNEST E
CLACKAMAS,OR 97015 9205 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S 35AC-00100 1S135DB-07300
CA TE LLC EMORY JESSE B 8
PO 1082 LEIGH A
CKA ,OR 97015 11280 SW 94TH AVE
PORTLAND,OR 97223
1S135AC-04600 1S135DB-10700
CA TE LLC ERDMAN LEE A 8 DARCY D
PO B 1082 11070 SW 95TH AVE
CKA S,OR 97015 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D8-10800 1S135DB-07800
CHONG BENTON L ERICKSON DAVIS A 8 SUSAN K
11250 SW 91ST CT 9115 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DB-04000 1S135DB-04400
ERVIN ROBERT&KIM HANSON PAUL C
11360 SW 92ND AVE 11315 SW 92ND AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D6-06600 1S135DB-0430D
ESTES ALICE L HELLWEGE GARY A&PATRICIA J
PO BOX 230299 11285 SW 92ND AVE
TIGAR�,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D6-12500 1S135D&08300
ESTRADA KAREN GAY HENRIKSEN LISA M
9269 SW NORTH DAKOTA 9165 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
_ iSi35ar-nz�oo-- - _ �s�ssoR-o�scm ---- —-------- - -
FOREIGN MISSION FOUNDATION HERGERT AARON 8 AMY
10875 SW 89TH AVE 9330 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D6-12400 1S135D6-08900
FREEMAN JEFFREY M 8 HUNTER NORMAN G JR
FREEMAN KATHLEEN E 6785 SW 175TH AVE
9293 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST BEAVERTON,OR 97007
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DA-02603 1S135D&09600
GOULARTE JEAN E JIMENEZ-RAMOS JOSE MANUEL
9095 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST 11155 SW 93RD AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223
1S135D6-07900 1S135DB-03900
GRAHAM JASON ALAN&JOYCE M JOHNSON CHARLEY F AND
9125 SW NORTH DAKOTA D.J.STRAUSBAUGH
TIGARD,OR 97223 11390 SW 92ND AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D6-10300 1S135AD-01600
GRIMES DEBRA E KAULUWAI CORPORATION
11094 5W 95TH AVE 2445-A MAKIKI HEIGH�S DRIVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 HONOLULU, HI 96822
1 S 7 35DB-09700 1 S135DB-04200
GUTIERREZ JOEL PENA KILLION JACK T JR 8�
11125 SW 93RD AVE BEVERLY
TIGARD,OR 97223 11270 SW 92ND AVE
PORTLAND,OR 97223
1 S135DB-10200 15135DB-07100
HAHN DAVID GERALD KING DOUGLAS A
11140 SW 95TH AVE 11320 SW 94TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223
1 S 135D8-09500 1 S135D&11700
LACAN MANUEL MEZENTSEV ALEKSANDR M&
11175 SW 93RD AVE OTROKHOVA MIRA M
TIGARD, OR 97223 11285 SW 91 ST CT
PORTLAND,OR 97223
1S135D6-06800 1S135D&10600
LACY JON R AND JANELLE A MICHAELIS CLAYTON W SR AND
11265 SW 94TH ARLENE L
TIGARD,OR 97223 11076 SW 95TH
TIGARD,OR 97223
iS135DB-06900 1S135DB-09900
LE JONATHAN H& MOBLEY RICHARD L BERTHA
NGUYEN THERESA T 9385 SW NORTH DAKOTA
PO BOX 231103 TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97281
1S735D8-0800n 1SY35fl8-ORtflD _ _ _ _
LEO VICTOR 8 EILEEN AND MONCHEK PETER/KARIN 8
LEO JOHNSON 8 ELLA STERN CASEY KlfERESA K 8�
1325 SE 9TH AVE BYPASS TRUST
PORTLAND,OR 97214 20 WARMWOOD WAY
HILLSBOURGH,CA 94010
1S135D&00200 15135DA-02600
LOFTUSLAURA& NADARAJAH DEVAYANI
WILHELM CLARE 8623 SW HAMLET ST
11275 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D6-07500 1S135DB-11600
LUND CHERI A NELSON LINDSAY R
11240 SW 94TH CT 11301 SW 91ST CT
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
7S135DB-71200 1S135DB-10000
MAHON SUSAN M NICKERSON RICHARD F&DONNA M
11310 SW 91 ST CT 9405 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135DB-10900 1S135D&12600
MARSHALL SHEILA K ODAM CAMERON 8 KRISTIN
11266 SW 91 ST CT 9237 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 , TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D6-08200 1S135DA-02602
MCFADDEN GEORGIA J PALACIOS DIONICIO MELCHOR 8
9155 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST RAMIREZ MARICELA MELCHOR
TIGARD,OR 97223 9025 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D6-11900 1S135DB-17000
MCFARLAND DAVID L 8 PALLAS DIANE E
ZHOU SU 11280 SW 91 ST CT
11263 SW 91ST CT TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD, OR 97223
135D6-127 1S135D8-11800
PA N PLAT 1995-084 OWNERS SCHENDEL WILLIAM M JR
OF T -3 11277 SW 91 ST AVE
, TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D6-04500 1S135D6-06400
PAULSON KEVIN J 8�ANDREA M SCHENK DANIEL LIVING TRUST
11345 SW 92ND AVE BY SCHENK DANIEL J TR
PORTLAND,OR 97223 7115 SW VIRGINIA
PORTLAND,OR 97219 •
1S135D6-11100 1S135DB-05510
PETERSON MICHAEL B 8� SCOFIELD DOUGLAS J 8�EVELYN J
LOUIE TINA L 11340 SW 94TH
11292 SW 91 ST CT TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
__ 1S�35DB-04601 . -----------------.--------�,�135DB-04301 ---------- - --- -
PFAFFLE GRETCHEN SEAMAN MARK
11375 SW 92ND AVE 8407 SW 58TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97219
1S135DA-04500 1S135D&09000
POWERS JAMES L SPRINGSTEAD WADE A AND
9075 5W N DAKOTA 5T LINDA S
TIGARD,OR 97223 11100 SW 93RD COURT
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D8-06700 1S135D8-D9300
PRICE JURREL L&SHERRY M STONEKING RAYMOND D AND
11245 SW 94TH AVE GERALDINE J
PORTLAND,OR 97223 1040 CEDAR ST
LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034
1S135DB-08800 1S135D&12300
ROAKE MARIE E 8 TARHUNI JAMAL
ROAKE JEFF S 11347 SW 91ST CT
11160 SW 93RD AVE TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135D8-07200 1S135DB-11400
RUSSELL BRENT A/SHANNON R TENLY PROPERTIES CORP
11300 SW 94TH AVE PO BOX 927
PORTLAND,OR 97223 HILLSBORO,OR 97123
1S135D8-10100 1S135DB-11300
SALQUENETTII BONNIE&JEREMY T Y P RTIES CORP
11160 SW 95TH AVE PO B 7
TIGARD,OR 97223 H SBORO, R 97123
1S135D8-00100 1S135DB-07400
SCHAFFER HARRY E& TRUAIR RYAN R 8 TONYA G
LILLIAN E TRS 11260 SW 94TH AVE
11245 SW 90TH TIGARD,OR 97224
TIGARD, OR 97223
1S135D8-09400
WASHINGTON COUNTY
LUT CPM DIV RNV SECTION
1400 SW WALNUT ST MS18
HILLSBORO,OR 97123
1 S 135AC-02400
WILLIAMS NIKOLAS
309 SE 83RD AVE
PORTLAND,OR 97216
� / .
Nathan and Ann Murdock Mildren Desly„ uroup
PO Box 231265 Attn: Gene Mildren
Tigard, OR 97281 7650 SW Beveland Street, Suite 120
Tigard, OR 97223
Sue Rorman Susan Beilke
11250 SW 82�d Avenue 11755 SW 114th Place
Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 _
Naomi Gallucci
11285 SW 78"�Avenue �
Tigard, OR 97223
-- _
---- ------ - __--- -- ----- ._ _ --- -
Diane Baldwin _ _ _ -- - — - -- ---- - — ---- -------
3706 Kinsale Lane SE
Olympia, WA 98501
Brad Spring
7555 SW Spruce Street
Tigard, OR 97223
Alexander Craghead
12205 SW Hall Boulevard
Tigard, OR 97223-6210
Gretchen Buehner
13249 SW 136th Place
Tigard, OR 97224
John Frewing
7110 SW Lola Lane
Tigard, OR 97223
CPO 46
16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242
Tigard, OR 97224
CPO 4M
Pat Whiting
8122 SW Spruce
Tigard, OR 97223
CITY OF TIGARD - EAST INTERESTED PARTIES �i:lcurpin\setupllabelslClT East.doc) UPDATED: 12-Dec-06
1
t
, ' O �
` �r d � ��' "-+,��t�-/ � � '�r � ��/ L/ �� - c-�'� PRE,APP.HELD BY:
CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION
13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARO, OR 9722
503.639.4171/503.684.7297 r: ���.;���
CITY OF TIGARD
OREGON LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION ' `' � �:!;h
File# }�l d-UU� -VUD� Other Case # �" � c_;o ` ` � 'a�RD
,
Date 7�� � �O By �-�� Receipt# ���O 36 4 City l� Urb ❑ Date Complete lS D �
TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR
�justmenUVariance (I or II) � Minor Land Partition (II) ❑Zone Change (III)
❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment (IV) ❑ Planned Development (III) ❑ Zone Change Annexation (IV)
❑ Conditional Use (III) ❑ Sensitive Lands Review (I, II or III) ❑Zone Ordinance Amendment (IV)
❑ Historic Overlay (II or III) ❑ Site Development Review (II)
❑ Home Occupation (II) ❑ Subdivision (II or III)
ress i avai a e
S 'U `� �.e�� Cn ' �re�s I 7 S �' �l ����v ,
_ � �s/.�saa � T� �y�
,.
C� , �S� CtG�r�S �-�1 ,�
CJa,n�eL �. Sch enl�
�1 �!5 �.�U, �� ' inc� �venc�e �r-�atii.� �� �7zlq
��3) a��- 7�.�7 Na �
(.���e1 �h�C�C�nk C��� a4� 7�.77
ac is i more an one
�t rr�. a� ct�c��;: f�.r��l J. x;he�v�k.
�,
N
� �
'When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be purchaser of record or a lessee in
possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The�ners must sign this application in the
space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application.
ease e speci ic
�
�
S�
APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT ALL OF THE REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS AS
DESCRIBED IN THE "BASIC SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS" INFORMATION SHEET.
_ a
THE APPLICANT SHALL CERTIFY THAT:
♦ If the application is granted, the applicant shali exercise the rights granted in accordance with the
terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval.
♦ All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits
transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based
on this appiication, map be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false.
♦ The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria,
and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application(s).
SIGNATURES OF EACH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED.
A 7
/
/ � `t` 1 1 V V
Owner's Signatu,r Date
Owner's Signature Date
Owner's Signature Date
Owner's Signature Date
Owner's Signature . Date
Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date
ApplicantlAgentlRepresentative's Signature Date
. _ ,F
� PRUAPP.HEID BY
CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DI N
:
�" LAND USE PERMIT APPLICA f VED
City of Tiga�l Pernut Cerner 13125 S W Hall Blu�, Tigrzrc� OR���2� 0
�
Phara� 503.639.4171 Fax: 503.598.1960 2�06
V�(�- �v�''._ UDO�� CITYOFTIGARp
File# 3 Other Case#� (.�L �j�(�_ Qjj� EERIN(`,
l0 c�
Date By J- '�� Receipt N 4's�7 Fee ��'�' Date Complete �
TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR
0'Adjustment/Variance (I or II) ❑ Minor Land Partition(II) ❑Zone Change(III)
❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment(I� ❑Planned Development(III) ❑Zone Change Annexation(IV�
❑ Conditional Use (III) ❑ Sensitive Lands Review(I,II or III) ❑ Zone Ordinance Amendment(I�
❑I-iistoric Overlay(II or III) ❑ Site Development Review(I�
❑Home Occupation(II) ❑Subdivision(II or III�
R A ress av
O�/ 7S� /V,C�I � l�I/C� � , �=�7.Z���
& .
�% S 13S �l3� Sy�
�
: �`��a��Js k' - y }
APPLI �
�Uni�� J �h�;i���
�7i��� S. �i1/. l�r lnrLF�-v� . /-����Z��� 97�/y
5Z'� z.�f�- 7�Z 7 7 — .
PE
i,.
/���-)�1���� �c�Clll� � `��-15�. .�Z j �zy� %17 7
R ER WNE DEE H ER Anac t more one
��t17/E� J. -SC.�7�17�
�i�_5- S vl/' �� li��������� ���a�Y�� �'�C� �1' 1,1 I � �
�i�y� ���l" 7�� 7 � `
'rWhen the owner and the applicant are diffemnt people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written
authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owners must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form
or submit a written authorization with this a lication.
ROPOSAL L'�IlvIARY P ease e specilu
�� "^ � �'` 'L�L �' 3Z�Z � 1,�6�
,G , �u.f� _ �� � � SZ%�n ti
�- 1 i - �
` c� �� � � c� � C�t'
' ` >, j / � 'i, � �' � �% , A �� � .�, � ,,� i
>
APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT ALL OF THE REQUIftED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS AS
DESCRIBED IN THE "BASIC SUBMITTAL REQUIREMEN'TS" INFORMATION SHEET.
i:\curpin\masters\land use applications\land use pernut app.doc
^ . .
THE APPLICANT SHALL CERTIFY THAT:
♦ If the application is granted,the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the tern�s and
subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval.
♦ All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan,attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are
true; and the applicants so acknowledge that anypernut issued,based on this application,map be revoked if it is
found that anysuch statements are false.
♦ The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands
the requirements for approving or denying the application(s).
SIGNATURES OF EACH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PR�PERTY ARE REQUIRED.
�tirz� %�/Z 3�o�,
Owne�'s Signature Date
Owne�'s Signature Date
Owne�'s Signature Date
Owne�'s Signature Date
Owne�'s Signature Date
� � ' �
������ �� �
� � � ' � <�.��,� iU`z�/���
Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature I ate T
Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date
. .
l0890 oeocA,P��� y���,,.�
�
rovao VICINITY MAP
' � 1S135DB, 08400 ;
' 10950 9365 9175 SW NORTH DAKOTA ,'
�w 10970
� 1
t � n
— »o�o �1076 "o9s ,,,00 SUBJECT SITE �
ll�zs �
�„oa 11090 � 11130 y
^ � �
,lrss C� a a `a
11140 !!10 /!!75 � I11160 a �
� N � ��
Q
O� q
i
S 11/60 Q o"�o � I „4'ry� a o � h �n �n y �.,
� O� � O� , q a a � '��'i O O 0 a
a �` a q W
DAKOTA ST
I� � ,
� o o �
1125 a a 11145 `,i 1240 � 11263 11250
°' 11285 11270 11177 11266 11145 �,t1,� 1I230 �
/1170 11165 11260
11285 11280
� 11190 11285 1/180 11300 11160
!l27S
�_ 11300 � II300 1/31S 11301 I1192 N
!l305 5 '
� !l320 11330 113/5 � 119I0 11310 ' i
II190 o so �oo �so zoo sso F�i I
�� 11340 1134S 11333 11324 11315 I .
!I350 • _''�`P"'
//360 11347 /l330 11300
11375 $ 11338 11375 II -"
11385 �
1l400 1139D !l390 `
II42S `� ,
11405 � 1I401 11403 11405 11400 v �
/ � ��41� � � Inlormation on this map is for generel location only antl
11410 s�ould De verifietl with tha Development Services Diviaion.
i 114S0 /1445 Il435 1143S I1440 ( �s�za sw Heu e��o
/1483 I143S 11450 � Tlga�d,OR 97223
(303)839-4171
�
http:fMavw.d.11gard.or.us
Community Development _,. Plot date: May 4,2006;C:lmagiclMAGIC03.APR
- _
� .
�
Y
= LAND USE PR�P4SAL DESCRIPTION
. � .
�� 120 DAYS = 7/13/2007
FILE NOS.: MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 200G-00003
ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 200G-00085
FILE TITLE: SCHENK PARTITION
APPLICANTS: Daniel Schenk&�laril��n��dair OWNER: Daniel Schenk Li�-in Trust
, �
7115 SW Virguua ���-enue B�>Daniel J. Schenk,`IR
Portland, OR 97219 7115 SW ti'irginia
Portland, OR 97219
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to parririon a 34,958-square foot lot into three lots of 8,188
square feet, 7,860 square feet and 8,514 square feet for single-famil�- homes. The site is currendy
vacant. The applicant is also requesting appro�-al for an adjustment to the access spacing standard
because the proposed prii-ate street on SW Dakota Street does not meet the 200-foot spacing
standard for streets and drivewa��s on a collector. There are at least se�-en dri�-ewa��s within ?00 feet
of the proposed private street.
LOCATION: 9175 SW\Dako�Street;Washington Counn-Tax�1ap 1S135DB,Tax Lot 8400.
s�
ZONE: R-4.5: Lo�ensin� Residential. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached
single-famil}� homes with or�vithout accessorv residenrial units at a m,n,mum lot size of 7,500 square
feet. Duple:ces and attached single-famil�� units are permitted condirionall�•. Some ci`-ic and
insrituuonal uses are also permitted condirionall�-.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Communin� Development Code Chapters 18.370, 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.745,
18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
DECISION MAKING BODY BELOW: ❑ TYPE I � TYPE II ❑ TYPE III ❑ TYPE IV
COMMENTS WERE SENT: MARCH 20, 2007 COMMENTS ARE DUE: APRIL 3, 2007
❑ HEr1RINGS C�FF'ICER (MON.) D�TL-: OI� H1;.IRING: TII�1E: 7:00 PM
❑PLANNING COM�TISSION (MON.) D�1TE OF HE��RINCJ: TI1�1F: 7:00 PM
❑CITY COL'NCIL (TUES.) DI�TE OF HE��RING: TI�1E: 7:30 PM
� STAFF DF,CISION (TENTATNE) D1�TE OF DECISION: APRIL 26, 2007
COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION
� `'ICINITY�i��P � DR�1IN�1GE PI.�1N ❑ SITE.1SSESS�iENT REPC)K'I'
� SITE PLr�N � STORI�Z Wr1TER.�N1�LYSIS ❑ TR-�FFIC STL'DY
� N�RR�ITIVE � 1�RBORIS'1'REPORT � OTHER: �iISCEI.L�-�NEOL'S
STAFF CONTACT: Emily Eng,Assistant Planner (503) 639-4171,Ext. 2712
LAHD USE APPLICa DN Project: <<��� ���� - �� 3
Date: l, , ��c,�
COMPLETEHESS REVIEW ❑ COMPLETE [�'1NCOMPLETE
STA RD INFORMATION:
e /Ti�Je/Proof Of Ownership � , es�Impact Study(18.390)
�P��rnce Provider Letter [–�- � te ❑ #Sets Of Application Materials/Plans�
re-Application Conference Notes ❑ Envelopes wth Postage(Verify Count�
PROJECT STATISTICS:
❑ Building Footprint Size � %{3�Laradseap+a�E�S+te Site
�Lot Square Footage
PLANS D MENSIONED:
�_
Building Footprint ; �T ❑
[}—�vitdirtgHeight Access Approach Md Aisle �Visual Clearance Triangle S o q
ADD IONAL PLANS:
_._.Y�ciaity-I+AQap_� ❑ --Arctutgsiaral-Plan � Treelnventory
xisting Condi" ns . n
Site Plan [��tiightingftan
TRE LAN 1 MITIGATION PLAN:
� p� ala,,,_ ❑
❑ ❑
ADDITIONAL REPORTS: (list any special reports)
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
O ❑
RESPONSE TO APPLICABLE CODE SECTIONS:
❑ 18.330(Condi6ona�use) ❑ 18.620(T'gard Triangle Design Standards) ��8.765(OrtStreet ParkinglLoading Requirement�)
—
18.340(Directors�nteqxetation) ❑ 18.630(Washing�on Square Regional Center) ❑ �ill�'t�9s�viewj�
❑ 18.350(Planned Devebpment) ❑ .705 aocess�y�ctra�ao�,1 ? ❑ 18.780(Sgns)
❑ 18.360(Site Devebprr�ent Review) �P�. � s{ ❑ 1 .71 O(Accessory Residential Uni�s) _�_--$.785 . _ Use Permits)
❑ .370(VanancaslAdjustrnents) .� ��,,�c:�J-' a�( �`18•715(DensilY�P��) _ —
❑ �. orong plText Amendments) •� ❑ 18.720(Desgn Compa6bi�ity Srandards) �sua1 C�earance A
❑ 18.385(Miscel�aneous Permitsl ❑ . 1 ❑ 18.797(Water Resour�es(WR)Over�ay Districx)
�18.390(Decisbn Making Procedures/lrt�pt'S�tudY) ❑ 18.730(Exceptions To Devebprnent 5tandarcls) ❑ 18.798(wireless Communicaeon Facili6es)
❑ 18.410(Lot Line Adjusm�ents) ❑ 18.740(Hstrxic Ove�lay) ❑ �(Street&Uti�ity Improvemen4�
❑ (Land Pa _D_�8.Z42,(HomeQcaPation Permi�_ —---
❑ 18.430(Subdivsans) :'"�����-?�ds�aA�e����9 S�
❑ _ es� en a � r �f875Q(ManufacwredM(o6�1
❑ 18.520(comme�aai a,�n� ❑ 18.755(r„�oced So�id wastelRecyc��ng Storage)
❑ 18.530�ind�,saiai zon�r��anxxs� ❑ 18.760(Norxonfomiing Sibuations)
ADDITIONAL ITEMS:
I:\curpin\masters\revised\land use application completeness review.dot REVISED: 17-Jan-o�
. . �
P;IBLIC FACILITYPLAN Project: _ ,enk Partition
� �OMPLETENESS CHECKLIST Date: 8/21/06
GRADING
❑ Existin and ro osed contours shown. Show existin contours
❑ Are there radin im acts on ad'acent arcels? Cannot tell without contours
❑ Ad�acent arcel rades shown.
❑ Geotech stud submitted?
STREETISSUES
� Ri ht-of-wa clearl shown.
� Centerline of street s clearl shown.
❑ Street name s shown. Show sfreef name on lan
❑ Existin / ro osed curb or ed e of avement shown. Show this
❑ Street rofiles shown. NA
❑ Future Street Plan: Must show street profiles, topo
on ad'acent arcel s , etc.
❑ Traffic Impact and/or Access Report 18.705.030.H.1 Provide preliminary sight
distance certification for private street/Norfh
Dakota intersection
❑ Street rades com liant?
� Street/ROW widths dimensioned and a ro riate?
❑ Private Streets? Less than 6 lots and width Must provide 20 foot wide Tract for private
a ro riate? sfreet
❑ Other: 1) 18.705.030.H.4, 2) Chapter 18.810 1) Must apply for a street spacing adjusfinent
since private street is only 65 feet from 92nd
Avenue, 2) Must include a narrative section
for Cha ter 18.810
SANITARY SEWER ISSUES
❑ Existin / ro osed lines shown. Show these
❑ Stubs to ad'acent arcels re uired/shown?
WATER ISSUES
❑ Existin / ro osed lines w/ sizes noted? Show these
❑ Existin / ro osed fire h drants shown? Show these
❑ Pro osed meter location and size shown? Show these
❑ Pro osed fire rotection s stem shown?
STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES
❑ Existin / ro osed lines shown? Show these
❑ Preliminary sizing calcs for water quality/detention
rovided?
❑ Water ualit /detention facilit shown on lans?
❑ Area for facilit match re uirements from calcs?
❑ Facilit shown outside an wetland buffer?
❑ Storm stubs to ad'acent arcels re uired/shown?
REVISED: 08/21/O6
1
. � . .
The submittal is hereby deemed ,� COMPLETE � INC� .�LETE
. ,�
By: Date: 8/21/06
REVISED: 08/21/06
August 21, 2006
r�
Daniel Schenk
7115 SW Virginia Avenue CITY OF TIGARD
Pordand, OR 97219
OREGON
RE: Completeness Review- Schenk Minor Land Partition
Case File No. MI.P2006-00003
Dear Mr. Schenk:
The Ciry has received your applicarion submittals for Minor Land Partition (MLP2006-
00003) to divide 1 lot into 3 lots at the property on SW North Dakota Street,near SW 93"�
Avenue;WCTM 1S135DB,Tax Lot 8400. Staff has determined your submittal to be
incomplete. The following before your application can be deemed complete:
• Provide existing conditions map;
• Provide items on the Public Facility Plan checklist (See enclosuxe);
• Show visual clearance triangle on site plan (See Code Section 18.795 for description);
• Revise narrative to address Code Chapters 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.745, 18.790,
18.795, and 18.810; Also,revise nartative to reflect any changes in the site plan.
• Provide site plan and narrative for street spacing adjusttnent application (See Code
Sections 18.370.020.5 and 18.705.030.H.4) and reduced fee of$301;
• Revise site plan or prepare sepazate tree plan to show which trees are to remain,be
removed or protected;
• Street trees are required for private streets and drivewaps over 100 feet in length.
Address requirement in narrative and on site plan (Code section 18.745.040);
• Vegetated corridor shall be 50 feet,per CWS provider letter. Site plan shows the
vegetated comdor to be 32.03 feet. Revise site plan, or indicate why the vegetated
corridor on the site plan is not 50 feet.
Once yout application is deemed complete, staff will begin the review process,which may
take up to 8 weeks. Please be aware that staff has not reviewed the application materials for
compliance with the Code criteria and may request additional informarion during the review
process.
If you ha�e any quesrions or need clarification on the above items,please contact me at
(503) 718-2712.
Sincerely,
� -......
Emily Eng _._
Assistant Planner
Enclosure: Public Facility Plan checklist
13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772
• 1
P!JBLICFAClL1TYPLAN Projecf: S�.renkPartifion
COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST Date: 8/21/06
GRADING
Existin and ro osed contours shown.
Are there radin im acts on ad�acent arcels? rs
❑ Ad�acent arcel rades shown.
❑ Geotech stud submitted?
STREETISSUES
� Ri ht-of-wa clearl shown.
� Centerline of street s clearl shown.
❑ Street name s shown. Show streef name on !an
❑ Existin / ro osed curb or ed e of avement shown. Show this
❑ Street rofiles shown. NA
❑ Future Street Plan: Must show street profiles, topo
on ad�acent arcel s , etc.
Traffic Impact and/or Access Report 1 'ghf
d" orth
❑ Street rades com liant?
� Street/ROW widths dimensioned and a ro riate?
❑ Private Streets? Less than 6 lots and width Must provide 20 foof wide Tract for private
a ro riate? sfreet
� Other: . . . . , 2) Chapter 18.810 ent
nd
A�w+4Z) Must include a narrative section
for Cha ter 18.810
SANITARY SEWER ISSUES
❑ Existin / ro osed lines shown. Show these
❑ Stubs to ad�acent arcels re uired/shown?
WATER ISSUES
❑ Existin / ro osed lines w/sizes noted? Show fhese
❑ Existin I ro osed fire h drants shown? Show these
❑ Pro osed meter location and size shown? Show these
❑ Pro osed fire rotection s stem shown?
STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES
❑ Existin / ro osed lines shown? Show these
❑ Preliminary sizing calcs for water quality/detention
rovided?
❑ Water ualit /detention facilit shown on lans?
❑ Area for facilit match re uirements from calcs?
❑ Facilit shown outside an wetland buffer?
❑ Storm stubs to ad�acent arcels re uired/shown?
REVISED: 08/21/O6
. T,he submittal is hereby deemed �] COMPLETE � INCG....�LET i( �:�I b L `�A�
By: Date: 8/21/06
REVISED: 08/21/06
L.AND USE APPLICA'. _JN p teeCt: M`"� �°°� -°°� 3
� ��
COMPLETENESS REVIEIN ❑ COMPLETE Q'INCOMPLETE � ��`�J
oc�
STA RD INFORMATION:
e /T�e/Proof Of Ownership , es[�Impact Study(18.390)
rvice Provider Letter � � te ❑ #Sets Of Application MaterialslPlan�
P�e-Appiication Conference Notes � Envelopes With Postage(Verify Count�
PROJECT STATISTICS:
❑ wlding Footprint Size Site
�ot Square Footage
PLANS pIMENSIONED:
Buildin Foo n � ? ❑ � � � �..��; �e
� ht Access Approach And Aisle � �sual Clearance Triangle S oq
_r—�--
ADD IONAL PLANS:
ci � r _ 4 �,,�[]�al�lan � Tree Inventory
� �icfi �[�^Landssa�e-�lan
Site Plan �iqhtingflian
TRE LAN 1 MITIGATION PLAN:
S�Q min,� ❑ '
❑ ❑
AQDITIONAL REPORTS: (list any special reports)
❑ ❑
a o
❑ ❑
RESPONSE TO APPLICABLE CODE SECTIONS:
❑ 18.330(Condioor�al Use) ❑ 18.BZO(Tgard Triangle Design Stardards) �8.765(OtfSteet Parkingltoading Requiremen�)
❑ 18.340(Directors mte�p�etation) ❑ 18.630(washington Square Regbna�Center) ❑ .
❑ 18.350(P�anned Deve�r�enU ❑ 1.8.705(access�g�ess ��`z ❑ 18.780(Sgns)
❑ 18.360(SiOe t Review) N��, �{ f-�- ❑ �.71 O(Acoessory Residential Units) 02 Use Pertnits)
� (VarianoeslAd�atrnents) if,;,,�;� ad� Q�1, $.�(p��p�pp�)L,i,�
❑ . on�ng . . ext Amendmen5) �'1 ❑ 18.720(Design Compaob�ity Standards) �,ai cieara�,ce
❑ 18.385(t�tsce��aneous Permi�s) ❑ • 18.797(water Resour�es(WR)Over�ay pstnct)
�18.390(�eci�on Mabng Proceduresnrr�rS`n,dy� ❑ 18.730(�cceptioru To oeveioprr�„t sranaabs) ❑ 18.798(w� tion Faairoes)
❑ 1 .410(Lot Line Adjustrnents) ❑ 18.740(Nistoric Ovenay) ❑ (Street&Utiliry Impro
� . (Land Pa }�
18.430(Subdivisions) n
� . en t . n ac� — ��1'Li+� �'CSu�..
18.520(C«nmeraa� oning ❑ 18.755(Maed said was�IRecyding 5�rage) (����, �} �'��
❑ 18.530 pndushial zoning Districts) ❑ 18.760(NoncontarTwg Si�ations) � ' � r�i
ADDITIONAL ITEMS:
� �Iti i r`t �✓ GL�.-l'�S'�t-.�
_ ' �' i t� �-�.i�t��-f T�.C�-t-� •— � � (�nA c'v-C� �
I:lcurpin\masters\revised\land use application completeness review.dot REVISED: 17-Jan-o�
' �'•
City of Tigard, Oregon • 13125 SW�HaII Blvd. � Tigard, OR 97223
Decembex 14, 2006
��
�
�
l�farilyn Adair
7115 SW Virginia Avenue � � '
Portland, OR 97219
RE: Completeness Review- Schenk Minor Land Partition
Case File No. MLP2006-00003
Dear Ms. Adair:
The City has received your revised applicarion submittals for Minor Land Partirion
(MI.P2006-00003) to divide 1 lot into 31ots at the property on SW North Dakota Street,
near SW 93`�Avenue;WCTM 1S135DB,Tax Lot 8404. Staff has determuled your submittal
to be incomplete. The following list contains suggesrions and items that are necessary for
your application to be deemed complete:
• Provide items on the Public Facility Plan checklist (See enclosure). Outstanding
items are highlighted in yellow. Staff comments are in bold type.
• Provide narrative to address Chapter 18.810. See attached example for applicable
criteria. Applicable criteria are marked with a circled asterisk and highlighted in
pellow;
• The private street shall be in a private tract at least 20 feet wide and labeled as such,
for example "Tract A";
• To a flag lots, consider putting"flag poles"in a private tract with the private c <xr��d —
stree quare footage from flag poles can not be counted in the lot area; ✓'� �� jcs�
• The vegetative buffer shall become a tract. This should be labeled on the site plan,
for example, "Tract B";
• Adjust square footage of lots so that Parcel 1 is at least 7,500 square feet. Lot
averaging is not pemutted for partitions;
• Revise density calculations to reflect any corrections and changes to site plan.
• Indicate on the site plan whether the following trees under 12"will be removed: Tree
# 71, 86, 88, 89;
• Indicate on the site plan and state in narrative whether the following trees over 12"
will be removed: 73, 91; and
• Revise narrative to reflect any changes on the site plan.
The review process begins upon completeness of the application and may take up to 8
weeks. Please be aware that staff has not reviewed the application materials for compliance
with the Code criteria and may request adciirional information during the review pxocess.
If you have any questions or need clarification on the above items, please contact me at
(503) 718-2712.
,
Phone: 503.639.4171 . Fax: 503.684.7297 . www.tigard-or.�ov • TTY Relav: S03_�R4.277� �
Sincerely,
�
Emily En
Assistant Planner
.
Enclosute: Public Facility Plan checklist
�
City of Tigard, Oregon � i312s SwHdll Blvd. • Tigard, �R 9�223
March 12, 2007 ��
�
�
Marilyn r'�dair
7115 SW Virginia Avenue . � �
Pordand, OR 97219
RE: Completeness Review- Schenk Minor Land Partition
Case File No. MI.P2006-00003
Dear Ms. Adair:
The City has received your revised application submittals for Minor Land Partition
(MI,P2006-00003). Staff has determined your submittal to be substantively complete. The
following items are necessary for your application to be deemed complete:
• Thcee sets of the complete application materials;
• Six sets of plans only;and
• Two sets of envelopes (addressed and stamped. Patty will call when labels are ready).
The review process begins upon receipt of the above items and may take up to s�weeks.
Please be aware that staff has not xeviewed the application materials for compliance with the
Code and may request additional information during the review process.
If pou have any questions or need clarification on the above items,please contact me at
(503) 718-2712.
Sincerely,
�
Emily Eng
Assistant Planner
Phone: 503.639.4171 . Fax: 503.684.7297 . www.tigard-or.gov . TTY Relay: 503.684.2772
�
r � r
0
i
►ORM No.77]-lAROAl111WD iALE DEEC(Ir w Corpor�). Co►nVO�rt�w� n[yr a:'veumw Co..rantµo.on rrm
. � "'•'""�`°"`°"'"''��.'°°" 2003-172937
�aoutoos os:sa:ss PM
o�t Crt�1 1tr��71 RECORDN
�� ---e,`y----��-----e''C�C�►_�----------------- � cs.00 se.00 s��.00•Toir.snoo
-�--�---------------------------------��--�--�--�-�� �1111q1111lIIII�IIilllillllllll�lllllllilllll
_________________��;�____________________
_���.�� ��.�________ � o��os��s�,��a�roo,00,�
_________
---���--- �----y-�(�--- 1.. i �.J.nrllww,�anao.dA.�...T.rR.naT.aa�nn
�X 'tyj�(p qu� _' _ "'__'___ vMb•plkleCanbClMtIwNMMnpwntw�ty.
�__�Q�`�"_�'�v_____S/___=JC�___-��- � M/CRIOhM�byCMUNIh�tIMYr[N�YNbVMMe! �. •�•
'__'_' p "'__ � _.�
OnnMY IMi'�n0 AAdns� '_ ' F_ wNM v�u neNrN�nd ncar�N M tl��OeeY d '
8R10E RESEMEO i ncrM d W!cw�tY� �yy,���p.� '�i��.. ' 1 •
��,(�)o_o�� � b pWMT.AAOfN�.�t r q � 'MnY � j � . ' _
��.[G_�_�_�_"'__`J."' ' "a�y � RM�na4DYMalMw��rnw��MTwue�. .... .
---- -------------------- aEOOwen•o ueE E■aeiae c«,nir a.�
-- l��----'�' �_---�� M.�,---- ------ -- �vnncss-my naim�ii[Q-seu�6i�ounry ariixed.-
--��cf_L��-----�--- - ------9 7�.J—
i�nm �..w aMr.ww..«,s.0 r. a�m lN.�».�aa....nvr• -------�----°---------------�------------
_'_�~_L_F""_ �" �' ��
'_"""_
_'_"" _"__"'_'__'
�-�--S=------�� t.�,?�----------------
--- BY-----------------°------------------.De u
---- -�$f G,=�---Q=`-�----�[7_�19_---- p ty�
BARGAIM AND SALE DEED
KNOW ALI.SY THESE PRESEN7'S that---------!�e'y-�-!1-------�'-------��C�'�l n-----------------------
6creina er called antor,for he vonsid ntipn 6e �nafter uatc�does creby gran erg sell ao rn y�t`o
-------------�
------�����--------�-�-----��4_�ow�---------rrS����--Q�__�an.��--�=-`'�--�—��`���v
heroinafter called grentee,and unto grentee's heira,aucceesors and asaigns,etl of that cortetn�al p�perty,qith the tenements„blered-
itnments and appurtenancea thereunto belonging or tn any way appenaining,situated in_ �t{�. !`__�TQ�1__________County,
State of Oregon,described as followa,to-wit:
The Easte�ly 200 faet of the Weste�ly 300 feet of the following:
The Southeriy 271.95 feet of Lot 24,ASHBROOK FARM,in the Cou�ty of Washington and State of
Oregon,and a portion of the Southweste�iy comer of Lot 25,ASHBROOK FARM,described as foAows:
Beginning at an iron pipe at the Southeasterly comer of Lot 23;thence North 0'10'West,271.95 feet
along the Easterly line of said lot to an iron pipe;thence North 89°00'East 480.5 feet to an iron pipe;
thence South 0°10'East 271.95 feet to an iron pipe on the Southerly boundary line of the D.C.Graham
Donation Land Claim;thence South 89°00'West 480.5 feet along said Southeriy Donation Land Claim
line to the poiM of beginning.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM the Westerly 75 feet of the South 100 feet.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion in S.W.North Dakota Street.
EXCEPIING THEREFROM the Easterly 70 feet of the South 100 feet.
QF BMCE M19UfFICffM COMtlNE DEBCRIPIION ON REV919E)
'Ib Have and to Hold the same unto graatee and grantee's heirs,sucoessors and assigos forever.
The tnie and actual oonsideration paid for ttus transfer,atated in terms of dollars,is S__Q_�a____________.m Hewwsr,�qa
m(7Le aotena between the rymbols m,if oot applicable,shouid be delued.See ORS 93.030.)
!n construing this deed,whe�e the coatext so requires,the singular includes the plural,and all grammatical chenges shall be
mede so that this deed shall dpply equally to corporations and to individuals.
IN WfCNFSS WFIEREOF,the gantor has exccuted this instrumen _________________________________________;if
grantor is a coiporation,it has cauaed its name to be signed end its seal,if by o�cer or other person duly authorized
to do so by order ofits board of directors. - `
THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCfiIBE�IN �_ _ �___--_______
HI INSTRUMENT IN VIUlAT10N OF APPIICABLE LAN�USE LAWS AND REGU-
- - - -----------------
LATIONS.BEFDRE SIGNING Ofl ACCEPTING 7HIS INSTRUMENT 1HE PERSDN
ACOUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WIT�i TNE APPRO-
------------------------------------------------------
I 1 R COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY MPRUVED USES
AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON UWSUITS AGAINST FARMING DR FOREST
PRACTICES AS DEFlNED IN ORS 30.930.
STA1'E OF OREGON,County of________ _�-�Y�_____ _ ss.� .
'Ibis instrument was clu�owled forc me o ��i �9 �003
-- -- --- - ------ ----+---------�
r-�-- -°-��---- --- - K=------------°-------------------------------�
This insWment cknowledged beforo me on----------- ----------------------------------�
bY ---------------------------------------------- ------------- ----------------------------------
----------------------------------------- -----°----°------- --°-----------------------
G�r'IOaAL8�1L-------- ----------------------- --- -----�- ------ --------------------•
KEl1.£Y MMTINE2 ----
H074j,r P�� .
MYCOAIMISCS�O�r���S10N N0,381347 --- -- ----- --- �='—`------- ----------
F�.f'IRES$fDL 1g�2(�Q Nota Public for Ore n
My ommission expires----- --------------------------- ---
� , � TICOR TITIE INSURA' 'E �
This map Is made solely for the purpose of assistinp in locating said prem(ses and lhe Company �
' assumes no llability lor variati0ns,if any,ln dimensions and Iocatbn ascertalned by actual survey. N
1 S 1 35 AC
�23 �J � r 2� � �
�
t�7 :•. �o � I
W/ ./9 Ac.
:T I
l.t..] 'a� ��� 25
�.� � �
:� 8�0 62.04 Zoo •3 ts•s
,� .� ��. � �"'i ZsQo �aoo ,.o 031 � � �eoa
.
o M�� � � T� .Ja a:. I .�o �c ;� .��a�.
• c � 3
�%° �oo � ^ 8;o, - J r� r� ���il � � .o s
� Z n
� �° � ./7 ar. 12500 � Wa I M „ 820�AC ./9� w
- � ,�„ 1l� 1� w �
'� — —f0 ` � ti, ° ' �� � N � SEE MAP
L• `>) Z W 33
q n ro +o.� I S I 35DA
�� „ 8700 12400 8500 $300 0 8° .�,�. �
N � / .2'.S Af� i� n - ./.�AC. 8 G•!�Ac.° «
,� I � « N .; O s ' �
- 3i � o i 270o m -
Y/L = �1 '� I �S.Oi A � 77 � t arf I 70 �y •S K60 s
�v� ic ��oo/ � � � �our� �iwe o�w
• �AKOTM ST I J . .u.uc :s�i:a: "o�" t�"t �OMM c
� • M •1• 14�l iN.1 119.57 �\" • 120
*r INITIA " �� s� t ���* 3O IN171aL POINT °(�9�� �`�'•p so' M��yO�10600 �NiT
r POINi' w 42� � ��-' �2 � �i �- A � t�
w7;� 766 Q '43� ' Q ,,, � 139.30 n �/ ^ 139.35
� W � � » o i�aoo � � � � iosoo
� � �i , � O •: 2 t
�1.30 StlO M �t^S��w � = n �p o
qp�u V iae.s�
� 7 -- -14 � � ��� ^ W — �����r — — � 1174� � ^ 11000
� �� 2 � � �j � � �� � „ w 3 /
�is 4i01 °
� 13 T.91
rA��.sto� ° ��as � a w (`-� � 116�0 �/, � N � I I 10�
� . � = g �� r — .: 4 C..
�
� TLOO �' � Q� " ia�.zo
ar 12 4�00 — — — — �
� i�ct
w.:� 3 Y 11500 �, � 11200
4100 " Si g �� R 5 �
r: r
7�OQ o � w (4 � w n , n
• 139. � lii.4i
`� t1�.f �� ° bi9� . �
o � e � J�'2 11300
i M � I I 400 R`za�. �
5510 : 4500 ���.'� :s e�•s w �� .b; �� b
� �.. c 4 x ni.so • � �o�.�o
�� 3 r� . . 22�ZZ
°�n - o gQQ� ► �u.'SO �f ,� �1 a7
2 lt�.t 1 C w �.'� p � �230� 'sj ''�2���
N J 16
�" N "� o� a �►� i22oo N � 2 0
K INI I L � ���.s �—! �z �/ ' 3 s` -
S�� 54� 4�� 5 � � � , J ) :J J ��3 09°�9'W
° • . �p' It6.73 ���
i�� � 3900 =
u �2 Q i�4
� IN.7 . w = 260 a �� �e�ni
6�y ��'� � .:'6S-R�� �'ziT'!� '` t�il'. ��� "..�w. `\ r.� z �,} .�"'"."------j . .
� '� '� .� ;?4�� .-:t '? ia �'bk � � i . .
� x'.l v. �.�• .� ��. .3 P � `�^`�r ������. £t rr .
h,y '� x a �y
WiyX; l' �''�:`�'1� a� _�w i ,�� � ,t�- � �.�.'J � '.��� . � +
�� �• � v � a'°.�s �, 4� .6 � � � i �., ..
"-� ��.�,� ' �' '�4r„�f{ ^�s �+��`L'4 3.e �`�� ..,�� � °�, �. �."„ j � ..
� � +y �r � y � ..
r ?'Y '��� '` ��L` I '� a`z,_t .� ��,��c r�' ���. � � f ;'��- � �
Tc , '.
r
[ t, b . , ;
F- � ��, j�� "��-'• {� �a .1.� '� �
f�� � ��ra '\\�\�'`� ��*CY'� �- a �, . . ..- � �,\�\-�\-�\(
yd .s �; F 4�� � �,�e `Y'. �!' � � 1`\\\\\\\``
� h• ��� +� 's "f' ���� ��� �,� .•\� t � _—"�'`;11-� �+�"
� .� � ��� .�` � ��t
� � ����' .�� � 1 t t ������\ � , R� l�'�� /� ' � _ �'�.��.�.
_ � r
• .
^y'�. ' ' . �' � ,��� � '�' . ``���� �a . . �°`"'<.
k � .?"-.1 � 3,�` "t k o�� -. �;� �^��,�y� �� / � � �:�;�,
¢~;� -,�, °� n "�r' `!�� �a`� ���`i��tt ��`4`. ���`��'a 'l s
z�� �*�'�.�r°� .,� , e���.'��, . ��� � ',�`�,�
�r ..� a �.��ti'- tq � �. � '. �,� '�`''!r�� ��
' je�" "� -§ y'4- 4 ec � � ^- �''
�`, � lr � `�4 �_ � '�`� "�5�.
_ .�t. i f'ar➢�� � . �� A.� � ��� 4 .'�'�#•�� �. . ..
''t. �,t .µ�, � r _��'�,.�� �� f ��� '��a�»,�,`�\\ � �: V����1y�• '. � ,
{ ,,,, � t � �._ .k''� �n, #� � ��, �b i� �
7� ��W y�, � � � 1R.��i`$"` a�' y ��`"� �°i�'�.''��t'e''� � 't.\ `��,��0,`'�i`y � '��w`+ �a'� .��.
h '!* ,1 v}, ' �+. t�.y � �� "��� � e y� � ! 3.�t�-` « �2c�v,-,�t � �� .
h?'4'., y " � '" t,, ��� �' � �� �yy, ��� *+. �$kf� ` � �, � �
,;�,' : �. ` .,.�, . 1.��..�,t�� ���i„�.���. ��.b`^•��.�•,r`'V,.►,�'�\,`�,��'�'��-��'�, �}."9.'��.�' ` �:�,�...t.:, \\ .
. , ,
y
�� '�''� `���+1;,�,y�a��i's�' ,, �''�.� �\�``�.� � #�` ,,�',n � .aa bQ.�.
� y,,�
.,K*�°'� i�.�YT�� �ra..,y..N„�i Z T .,'"f k'kar,,w� ���,����'�"E;�`�\���"'.i�►�, � ��4�,� ,�.,��:;�#�` t'� "��,��I v�14 . �''ti
�f �.i�' +� s }���, �
��1. ��} � y�,,,,�� { � .;„�i`�'L�,� ���r`"���_��'l�h1.�6'>": p�� '�T.� '+�`�g��,�y,�,fS��•�.� � � � �,h"� ^ �'�•�
�Y,�_��i..ti �� �'`'it°' �h'r ���1.���r�. ♦ A � yP�` � � '4 ��`?����� � -� :
�k '°�'`s�'t"�*;� .{ �� °:,, �i" i '�+t'�� ��; �������`"��.� ���� "ks� `�, �� '"'(�+ J
*-����. . . ,�_.- �. � �, '` ., • ,` �.*�,.� 4�#�., �s��� � �.y°�,. .,R�.. �.+..�� �,�.h4, �, � ,}'!4 r ,., .
bJl�.,. x� a+'n�'�.�.t^ ;dlf �5;� a�;q sk,._L "`°� �4.� �� `S,'�. � ys�f.�;..'� �, �'s,� `;'L'� �'`�;kw„`� � l�a, '$,'� t`��y` +.
� � ,� �`h.. � P; .i.yZ,Y` �� 'ti� ��` '�,a.�� ��? `���y�9e,a���a."*.�'�`�.,y� �"°`@�.-.�'� _!a y
C" � ��., ��W,.. ` �.;y. �4`z�"'�; ��'��� > �Y,� �°� `"Y�,'. �
�."'�%'T� i. •�. ��s. ,w:' + `. �� l, �� ��M � 's, � a �'� $� +.,� �.�,,�a,, ,' ,:
'� { �A� �i� �����. ��� y`s"'tiy;s'���w��.�� ���, ��'��`r�����4����S`����i��"��"^ \\.�1`�i'Y`',e*..�..i a» �.aS'�°.;mi
l�'� �� �... , p
�'�*t � °;�� j• t. i m �...�„z �'���ti���\�'��+t`R` +,�, �<'`� �A ��^�,���'��'`'�nti�+'�'j'��a'y,, "'°���� `�°`.``��e*"4`�j���
�,"""�._ 5 I � �` --�--+� �.� �"� �n. ��`�' .:�� ������ �.&`� ���.���x � Ea�,,k`����`�+, t ''
I� I , ,, �. t : ,.�*�•���"��y �' .�`"�, . � .��.,,��..a.�,+t,"�,����`� i��. �``,��� '�,. �°t`+�'�`4�'a����..w„
L �
f � , ,� � � '"`��'�,���,�.`,�, `�. �� �'�'°�.�'��`���,������� ._'��`� �,����,� ��
�t � �� t� g�` r s.,�+a � 'k�y�� �``? ���
.
I .
„ �...�...... �, � . i .: .,� �'��� �S� �` �,:���`°. �� �,A .' ,•H,A +•�,,,,�s'�'`z'�`.�,�``,�� .�'�i �Ca�- �,. �, � :'�
> ,I �.� . �'��,`�"�:����,,'�°�. .�' �; h,� �,-���a�> �.•+�� '�.� �' �'� � � �"�.
� — �� `�: ���, '� "i �,4
.�. �
� �`'�`��:��`�,.� ��.�� �� V �'��� �, ,� �, _ �_ �� ��.,4=`
i,'�I � ; .���� . : _ - � �,� i�a::� "'° ♦ �� `e'�.,�;�� `"' �+ �,,.�. � ,�. @ ..���\�.�"� 4-�., v4'y�1
� } - �':? ,°'a � `t a `-,�A1�.�..5�,. vx;� �. ��'�< �� ����
�' ."' `. . ` >.` .. _ ��j,��. - a?„"�..5.`�--�.�.'�i1.\.'1
.
�x .;
„ . ,
� yi •�°e xA �� t C�r ��...,�h,i+�...�t ��s�t e�` .. � . �,j k
�_ _:�.1°'"`�.., _ .. �'Y7 .,� �-�.'�.� � � .1 ."1M' � - as+t�ii, �. -?g,.,l"" '�" �
.���cy�'..< i . � v. - "���,�-y•��'� t �`f ��� .+'� �t�t}�^,� �r.�„�'� ~��R
..� _ � 't,k �� ' � ` $�e<, : ��• �°a:�
• a
r� � e��,.;'��.� ,, - � . � ��� H'�.;'� � �'e" t '-� — � � ,�.;y�,
�: .
� 4 �.� � 1 :.� �� wt'�Aa, {+... _-�p � ��y, � ,P�a
� � �.
� ,� ' ,g� r-r`s r �( .. ,� r•,."��.'�ti�4�'!S �r , - C :a�li
. ...� , � r� �`.'�'�
�'�<�`y� '3,:. �`� � ��1`` 'i j # `�ai � .�+, ,— _ �. t 1 'r '�-,�._- .,r� a�� �e �°°e ,ti
�►�.,y�,�.1�....�. . µ�� `� ' ^'�+°;?'7rc '�• �rMfO'�+.:.''�,��i x ,',3'r 4�. - .
.� �,� tt' t , � '�X ij �
� . .. �' ���j 1t�� .��..-r�s� L` ~� ' ���� � . ..
i �' "�• t'`+.^4• ; I '�q, t�
....� _>�� ' r � ��R" �`�, ♦ °.#' ,.�`." .�.i y � A`�
�, �A�� `���k.�i. �� � � .. e �" �� _
I' . �. ��� ' !�+ _i4�r �°�..• 3+ � �. � . :�
�� i`���(' �� . ;..�, �Y, � '�'� .� y� �� y .�\`�' ,t�+i.i iF ;! 'i.
. + M1�.yn+�, . �� - ,'w�; i v"'! � .. . �F-�� 'y�s z}air } "y ''+�
Lr i r�� y4. ��"ye i �, �°`,
i , � �. I ; .��� � �+ a�Y'- ' ,�a
� += � ,,� ,� �� ""'- � .,� �.,.. �� %r�~#-" � �• • �� , .
§'. e.'�v k°:f � _+s e � �� ( ' �� � +5�� -
,�°",�.. y %;�:y,..:�kT� ._._ 't� }��� i �` � � " n��i � '� ��". � ���" .
..
� � ..,� F . ��1`�^� . *�' � R' 3'- � '"* - n�'?
e`ah, "� ��, � �,3�>, � , �t q
�
� �. .'�,. . �..t�Y',.,y_. �` K.�L �"4 i �,r . _ _ � � t- �ti"� 'C .�u= �'4. . . 'k"� �
. . ..{1 j�. - t �: f!En«f. . ' � � .t, ' �F', • �'° '{K.. Y�'
. v 5. ��,i
� .. w � � � ' � .�
' � S� r �
�tr " d yi �r . ' �q A�( 1',�(� f. , Sas �
yp ? � � " � ����
�"�" m.e�� �y.rer �'�'«r� �-.��.� �.}���, K�:.� � ' e:�'�W 3'� <:�A �S�i� r�� l� f s �'� � ,�,� �,�„__�„��,.,�_�, . . .� 'Y�'-•+:
�rs.� .`is "`:�� e s . "�r k&;#! y�ai " � c������ � � �" �� ����6 � � �� y�,� �� ��.' ,��+*q,;
� p ti .r.— � `.�'i l ;�,� i 1�: ���j�` �,t'�'>'� i } s��'
� � �j..,Q�, � � y �� _� �,.. .•'�. ti f� e� `�f�� rr�'+!��,'!'s �' i«�..l��" - ... .. _�,.v�
y R'�s�f i 7�+;�,,:�, y ' � .i.. ��,� a � � ��
��3 ,t!sc �s: ? .�,,,. r��r;s , + , 1
� .. r, , , �� . ,�� � r-^`�t�S �♦t � �V� �� � n .w.� d,�p��'. �.� '.1
I � ; q ��. ' y � .{� . .. �N" .'.eW� .
!
f c,�r� �'s, _ ts: , ie � 6 a - �. �/
=r� � �,'-�,� 'v�' �S� ,',�� ' -. y� r�a' ��:`� �+l/ �.: ( 1 �
�''f r �4"� � ..°�'S+�`" �r. ,s � ' ��� � g��� '��l�.,�„�a:: Y ` Y. �:
� � - ��J�. dy �. ��., ,���� . �p� � '3`Q3'" � , _
.}Jr` s /
..1M�� } �'�i~ �4�„�.�� '1 �'^�"Y '� � ' � �*�y''g � �"' ,�' ��ii ��y . -�S'�'1��'.
� . . . s. +^� i . � �„ _.. u,� u^�,�tiry�d��< ... '"� � ��k�-
,.r+9'� x e� p w,
,� �1 �' ( ,� ' � a` "�'s _ '�"'�' ,� � ��� ,�y`,�°
� '*`'� � R1 ��' � 7 e �..' �, '� s a� � �
��_.... �""r � ' f'�� ��'x`, t �( : �'r �� :��d��r � .� ��
•�' . `--.���x,y�♦ y ���� �Y-.��yi ..,a" #� d.-ri�= ���,�� � .
` fi K��T .'��i°� b I f (`y'�/y� � �g^ �h�$'�51��'���� �F �F� � {`
�l ��, ���� �`.�. . `~v � � �! � A I f"f �r�(� tf'� �� .._.. �� � � a
e� '_:3 'LI� � �`
`� `Jf . : � .r� � ( � .L u� + � � ,�"�+t I' �-F{� �i a �.�'• : . ' �'-�� . .
`�` �~YA q��f�" �f' - �.r� { a6 '� /dT,�*f'•+� srl�`.� � � /�(�I
�`� . •Mi��.. .K.'�a . ,. . �S��',y_A�A� f '�r r �'.ABi-,�` /.3' . .�•�/� �� [ ) )
� � � e�s � �.,_:,. �r��v.���t'�' ,'j!.�<� ..3�� , "� d �a CY�
i . . "''F�b .� i� � �t/� �';` � � ,'� . �..;" , �
�, r , � ; �, : . � � : �.,��,� �� ,� � �
, `;. � F V �r. '', `��K� � -`!�, �,; ,� �rt� ��'�
� .
�
��- ` � `�r �,��, � � � � `�' �,` � f�
{"'�� a .. JA'�.,. �I s,f�'>, "a� +�'�-' ��' }l��'• $ ..�°p"'� ,.._�„� �_• . .. y
M � bl
\ '� �
,
��
.� �___._,.
- ..�
� �
� \ 1
,
, / ! \ .
.
�`
__\_ J ,\ /,
�
/
�
�'
�
� �,.
. _ _._-
. .. �
.
, ;. .
. 1��, � .
, . _ ___ :
, , ___ __ .
J ----- \__ -' __ - = '\
�- "
�.
, __----- -- ----------��_
---- =
-------__-.._..__ --- - qU,-'
- M-�---- �
---- ._..._-__.- . _.._._..._---___
__. ._._..
.1 i" — ------
---- _........__........
__r...
� `
i �
�' I
-� �S T .___
� =
---- _
, r
----_ =
----- -- _ -
-- -- _
__---------- _____ _- __ ___
.
_-.. ____ __ __, _
___ _
----- , ____ _.
,.__-_. _ _ ___ _ _� __ , ----- _`._. ;�
: _..- _-
,_� ._- _-
;- ..-.-
-_-_._
: _.. _, `.
�
� -_ -� l
; _._--
,
_...
- - _-�" i_ :
�.
� _.__`._. - __ ------ ._
_._._ ,, .__.
__
�_
;- -
_-- -
.�- , -�-- ---:
`
.
- ._ _.._
� ,-_
� --� - ,,...-.
__ __� �=-
�- _ --.-.-..__..___--- ._ ,.
. .
- �' - --- -___ --
_..- - - -
----- ___------ ,
,�_
..�
__-.__ �:
.
_- .__ - �
__ _- :-� . f�
i .
_�- � ��
-- ---' � � '�\._
- ---- � - � _
/ .�� �
_
.- � �-----
: __-.----- � _
:�_._
.% j �� _ `__ ,� 'f \� ��i,
i _ / / (� ,"- ��
i"
� - / /� _
�.
_ '' ,, -' __ � ' _ _ _- _---- / _.__---
Community Development ��F
, � �
.�� •
MKx rnY REVISION
� Ta Na• �ATE DESCR.
N � �
S I � � �
m t° � , ' '
z �
c I ---------------- - � �
----------
m -------- ---- � ..
-1-- ' --------
j � I � ,
� ; , � -
lo I � � ;, WEPL: WETLAN� DETERMINATION PLOTS
. � �
Tg
i
ti
� �'-'-----'--J � _ _ _ _ - �(; VECO: VEGETA'�ED CORRIDOR PLOTS
- -
- -------------- /A'
- -----=---------a -- ----
� vv
- ---
---
$ , �
----------------- -----------
, � .
� -------------- -------- -------------= ----------- ; �- �`
� � �
� � � ' 21� ABRAM�
� � ; �
Ja � ; , PROPERI
�.,,�� � ,
i �T �
�
s� .
- � � �, ��
� �
.
I � � � .
' � .
� I ' . � .
. . � , . - -
I � ' ' ' -
, ��_"�;
' SITE PLAN,
� - - ,� �. �. � - - �
� �
�� , .
� ` xx� �,� > � �'` "- -:•:�Y•:•:•:•:-:•:•:-:-:-'-�-:-'-:�;�:�;•. SENSITIVE ARI
NOR7H CORRIDOR pREA: '`��fy��x% �r' � - . . . . . _ . . _ _ _ CERTIFICATI(
17.7 6 3 S.F. 0 N S I T E U !`,� • - - • • • • • • - . . . - - • . . . _ . . . . . - • -- • •_-
� , � �� " ' • - - - - EXHIBIT
i �; ��.
I+ WEILAND AREA: 62.463 S.F. _ '\
r (EX7FJJDS OFF S17E� - .�•- '•••••'.'•'••'•'•'•'•'•'•'•
T8 - _�+.
_'_' -, �� '_ -
I ��: :. : � �- �:;� .
SOlJ7H CORRIDOR AREA: `< .'.�' ' ' Jr:: �. ,�` . � (�
� 22.021 S.F. ON-SITE �y � �•'• - •, '-� f J�`� a I rl
=��':���- �-� �� - �;>:, , . �<��,�� �` � P
� - .
� . - _ _' _ _ f� er fy;( � ,��c� COMMUNITY DEVELOPME
� SCALE ,> Y�Y.�r):��<`�yc� '��`�
. . . . � '<" ` �< <.
� 0 7D �0 ' Eo ; ' ' ' • ' '' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' . � �'�'r��� �Y�
� -----1 soun��t�r��[n . . ..'.'.'_'_'." ".._'.' . . • - - • - • . � � }.
I GUm GdttiT10N 1' " �' " ♦ ... .' ' ' '.. Y A v x )� Y .
� ' • •
I � � � � �(�'�?i(�' '���s�.-.' • ' ' ' -�� ,�i��•�.. . � . ' " ' ' .',( �)���y���C��y� s �f,�Y� PROJECTNQ: 326-1
0 1 IN a�0 FT .[ A�J� -�'�• .�,��( n �f� v � f�/ •h �h k n ! T TYPE: PLANNI
Tg .�`.��. .�i .0•<�! Xf �Y,�Y"r�' > Y Y. \n n.n.0 i'i<��` �` �^ ��Y^x�,�� > t__ OO�
I � X X X C�<��! < < < � DATE:
* � _�.�_-__
� vEm t � A'
� ' Y��
. C:\worlc\lGPbf�86gNhroms Cw3 aW�bi}.dvg�SiEEf:�r31 Oec IS 7m5-Itr.17an jem �
1
�� t� `_ � ll
��� �Q� ���� ooa .
``de ra � '` 9
�a� � ���- � `��,..-t; a��. �i�j�r�- 2 - �
C.o�c�,c�o� ���.e�� P 'r`'9 s - ���!�vosr�� �ch eu�,K I-�ope r�
-�-Q X pP oved , , y
- Clean Water , ice ' �X�S.�' �p�fip�S J"tQ
� �
BY � Date� �� Nw ��.� �-•
S`Pc- �-� ,�:� z�z_ --r' a,�rd , OR_ .
� q x �t B��
, . .
I
SW North Dakota Street Partition
June 12, 2006
Revised October 2006
Revised January 2007
General Information
Applicant/Owner: Daniel J. Schenk
7115 S W V irginia Avenue
Portland, Oregon 97219
(503) 246-7277
Property Address: 9175 SW North Dakota Street
Tigard, OR 97223
Tax Lot: #1S135DB-08400
Lot Size: 0.80 acres
Current Zoning: R-4.5
Pre-application meeting: December 20, 2005
Surveying Firm: Love Land Surveys, Inc.
1415 Washington
Oregon City, Oregon 97045
(503) 656-4915
Environmental Services Firm: Fishman Environmental Services
434 NW Sixth Avenue, Suite 304
Portland, Oregon 97209
Tree Survey Firm: Halstead's Arboriculture
P.O. Box 1182
Tualatin, OR 97062
Planning & Engineering Firm SR Design
8196 SW Hall Boulevard, Suite 232
Beaverton, OR 97008
Site Description
The site is located on the north side of SW North Dakota Ave near 92"d Street.
There are no buildings on the property. The site has scattered trees and it slopes
gently to the north toward the wetlands buffer zone.
Sanitary sewer service and the water line are available on SW North Dakota. The
storm water from the site currently drains to the north to the wetlands beyond the
site.
Note: The wetlands buffer zone of 50' (irregular line) has been averaged by the
surveyor, as allowed by CWS, and is shown in the averaged form on the site
plan/survey.
Proposal
The applicantlowner requests approval to perform a three, lot partition on the
parcel of land which contains approximately 0.80 acres (34,958 square feet). This
partition will create Parcel 1 with approximately 8,188 square feet (net.), Parcel2
with approximately 7,860 square feet (net.), and Parcel 3 with approximately
8,514 square feet(net.). This request is for land partition only. The owner does
not plan to build on the site.
City of Tigard Development Code
The following discussion addresses the chapters of the City of Tigard
Development Code that were clarified as relevant to this Type II application,
during the pre-application meeting held with the City of Tigard, on
I�ecember 20, 2005.
Chapter 18.390 Decision -Making Procedure
18.390.040 type II Procedure
A. Yre-application conference: A pre-application conference was held on
December 20, 2005.
B. Application Requirements: A Type II application with all requested
information is included: Clean Water Services Report, Impact Study, site
plan, Sight Distance Certification, Application for Street Location
Adjustment, Tree Assessment, and a checks for$3650 (accepted on
7/26/2006) and $301.
Chapter 18.370.020 Adjustments
5. Adjustment to access and egress standards
b. 1. It is not possible to share access.
2. There aze no other access points on North Dakota Street, or from another
street.
4. SW 93`d Avenue (a cul de sac) is located approximately 250' north of the
center of this proposed street, and 91 St Court(also a cul de sac) is
approximately 250' south of the proposed street. 92°d Ave does not enter
North Dakota Avenue ( though the Tigard Vicinity Map indicates that it
does). Between SW 93`d Avenue and SW 91S`Court there are 9 driveways
entering SW North Dakota. The approved access will result in safe access
because nothing is obstructing vision within the"triangle" as shown on
the site map.
5. Site distance clarification has been completed and documented by Steve
Roper PE of SR Design. The document is included with this application..
Chapters 18.390.040 and 18.390.05: Access
Each parcel will contribute a strip of property (18', 19', and 18'wide) to be
combined into the private road, which is to be 20' wide, the side walk 5' wide,
and the easements. See site plan for visual clearance and access details.
Chapter 18.420.050 Approval Criteria
1. The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance
requirements.
2. There are adequate public facilities to serve proposal.
3. All proposed improvements meet City and applicable agency
standards; and
4. All proposed lots conform to the specific requirements below.
a. The building envelope areas meet the lot requirement of the
applicable zoning district. Refer to the building envelopes on the
site plan.
b. The lot areas are as required by the zoning district: parcel 1 at 7559
square feet, parcel 2 at square feet, and parcel 3 at 7601 square
feet, as shown on the site map.
c. All parcels have a front public right away of 20', as shown on the
site plan.
d. Setbacks are indicated on the site plan.
e. Any future builder will indicate the front yard azea.
f. The screen along the paved drive in access will consist of trees,
shrubs and ground covers (18.705.) Refer to site map.
g. A fire hydrant is located on the corner of North Dakota and 95�'
Streets.
h. A reciprocal easement will be recorded, prior to issuance of
building permits, by any future builder.
5. The accessway complies with chapter 18.705, Access, Egress, and
Circulation and is shown on the site plan.
6. Not applicable.
7. An application for street a spacing adjustment is included with this
application.
Chapter 18.510.020: Zoning
D. R-4.5: This propasal is for three, sjngle family hA�1es as sk�Awrlln the
Land Partition Standards Table 18.510. It is also addressed in 18.420.
Chapter 18.510.2 : Development Standards in Residental Areas
The maximum footprint setbacks for the future building of homes meets the
standards for R-4.5 Zoning on Table 18.510.2. also refer to the Site Map.
Chapter 18.705 Access
H. Access management
4. The applicant has filed for a street location adjustment. The street meets
the street width requirement, but not the spacing requirement of 125'.
Chapter 18.715: Residential Density Calculation:
The lot is .80 acres located in an R-4.5 zone.
Total: 34,958 Sq.Ft.
Deductions are indicated on the site map.
Net: (34,958—12,183) 22,775/ 7,500=3.03 Max. Density
Chapter 18.745.050: Buffering and Screening
Plantings for buffering and screening on the drive include two medium sized
(Acer Rubrum) Red Red-Sunset maples on each side of the drive, spaced 30'
apart, (Berberis) Barberry bushes near the property lines and several
(Arctostaphylos) Kinnikkinnik as ground cover to spread on each side of the
drive.
Chapter 18.790.030 Tree Plan Requirement
A. A tree Assessment, by Halstead's Arboricultwe Consultants Inc., has
been completed and submitted with this application.
B. Tree Removal Plan:
Existing trees over 12' caliper: Parcel 1 Parcel2 Parcel 3
2 6 0
Trees to be removed: 1(#80) 2(#85&97) 0 - 37%
C. 63% of the trees over 12' caliper will remain. Three trees will be removed.
The mitigation of 50% or 1.5 trees will be replaced as follows. Two
(approximately 12' caliper) Alders will be planted toward the rear of parcel3,
at a time appropriate if/when building takes place.
Trees, 86, 88, and 89, all under 12' caliper will remain. Tree 71, a 6' caliper
Hawthorne, will be removed. Both trees 73 and 91, of 14" caliper will
remain.
Chapters 18:765, 18705: Parking
Each lot has adequate area to provide at least two off street parking spaces.
C1eanWater Services Buffer Standards:
C1eanWater Services has reviewed this property, guided the lot design, and
provided (enclosed) documentation.
Chapter 18:795: Clear Vision Area
The private street allows for clear vision as shown by the triangles on the site
map.
Intersection sight distance certification was completed by Steve Roper P.E. It was
submitted with the application in October of 2006.
Chapter 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards
18.810.030: Streets
This site is parallel to SW North Dakota Street between 91St Court and 93`a
Avenue. Since the site is set back from North Dakota Street over 100 ft. a private
road of 112.88 feet length by 20 feet wide, as indicated on the site map, will be
dedicated as the only (possible) access to North Dakota Street.
Chapter 18.810.040: Blocks
No blocks will be formed with the proposed partition.
Chapter 18.810.060: Lots
The proposed lots/parcels dimensions are as follows:
Parcel 1: 75'w x 115.13'1
Parcel 2: 81.29'w x 90.83'1
Parcel 3: 70'w x l 15.43'1
None of the proposed parcels have a depth that is greater than 2.5 times the
average width(or 75.43'x2.5=188.5').
Grading: Contours of this property are shown on the enclosed contour/vicinity
map. The property slopes gently down from the entrance of the proposed private
street at North Dakota Street toward the back of the property. This slight grading
does not impact adjacent parcels.
Chapter 18.810.070.A: Sidewalks
A 5'wide sidewalk will be constructed along the east side of the private road, as
indicated on the Site Map A.
Chapter 18.810.090 Sanitary Sewers
The sanitary sewer runs down the center of S W North Dakota Street. A lateral `T'
off of the existing sewer line will run under the center of the private street. A
manhole will be located as far north on the private street as possible and still have
gravity feed. The sewage from the three parcels will be pumped into the manhole.
The 15` easement around the sewer line is also shown on Site Map B.
Chapter 18.810.100 Storm Drainage
As per conversation with Damon Reische of C1eanWater Services on January 23,
2007: Ditches, conveying storm water, will be constructed along Tract A, the
private street, continuing toward the back of the property, along each of the four
parcel lines. The ditches will terminate three feet from the line of Tract B, the
vegetative conidor. At this point the water from the ditches will flow through a
flow dissipater made of rock boulders or large chunks of concrete,just inside the
parcel lines. Each flow dissipater will be a approximately four feet long x two feet
wide and one foot deep. See Site Map B.
Chapter 18.810120 Utilities
Water will be accessed from North Dakota Street. The meters will be located in
the green space next to the sidewalk on the private street (site map B).
A Public Utilities Easement, eight feet wide, will parallel the outside of the
sidewalk easement. The PUE will continue to the edge of parcel 2 and then `T'
and extend five feet inside of both parcel 1 and parcel 3 (site map B). Electrical
service will be made through above ground junction boxes with a PF 300
transformers.
m ac e �M �Vl
Q
�
.
e,� � �e rav �
�ers
v
i �
Impact Study for North Dakota Street Partition
June 12,2006
Transportation System: The lots of this proposed partition are to be accessed by
a shared, private road from SW North Dakota Street, which is a paved road
without gutters or curbs. The private road will be 20 feet wide by approximately
120 feet long. It includes a 5 foot sidewalk and turn-azound space for each
proposed dwelling.
Storm water generated on SW North Dakota Street flows in ditches along each
side of that street.
Drainage System: The current storm drainage for the site drains south to north
into the existing wetlands buffer zone and wetlands. (The required CleanWater
Services report is included in this application).
Parks System: This partition application plan is not proposing to donate any land
to the City of Tigard for open space or parks.
Water System: This partition plan will tap into the existing water main on SW
North Dakota Street in order to provide water service to each of the three parcels.
Sewer System: The sanitary sewer will be accessed from SW North Dakota
Street. The sewer being fairly shallow, an, approximately, twenty five-foot
extension will be made into the property, where a manhole will be installed.
Sewer from each of the parcels will be pumped into the manhole.
Noise Impacts: This proposal is for a residential partition, which will create three
residential lots. It should not generate any extraordinary noise impacts to the
surrounding neighborhood.
Daniel J. Schenk
9125 SW North Dakota Street
Minor Land Partition
*Site Map Revision:
As per the phone conversation with Emily Eng, December 2006, the Site Map A
has been revised as follows:
1. No flag lots.
2. Tract A: road.
3. Tract B: vegetative corridor.
4. Square foot area of poles added to parcels.
5. Easement square footage subtracted from parcels.
6. Sidewalk easement.
7. Private Street enlarged to 20'.
8. Street name.
9. Edge of pavement.
Site Map B
1. Storm drainage.
2. Sanitary Sewers.
3. Water meters.
4. Public Utilities Easement
Additional enclosures:
Fire hydrant location map.
Site grade map.
� UC
�
� o� 30� so� so� � /l'a� /-I 9�z s S.u.�,�U. ��Fa
SCALE: 1��-30� ASHBROOK �ARMS
BK 2. PG 33
SOUTH LINE OF WETLANDS AS
DETERMINED BYALPHA COMMUIVITY DEVELOPMENT
N 00°41'44"E j2"QAK N 88°.��3.9"E 2�.��
6.00'(M)5.98'(PP)
� q2
TWO
� TRACT��B�� ~'/�DER %R3 f2"ALDERS �
�4 i _ VEGI TATION C013R1 DOR n�+nrl r,�u.�ER ��R� � `� � $
`� g 6 405 SQ. FT. �. ° °°
m � 12"ALDER ' ��{S q� g� �j
g7 0�1-10"OAK Zc� ~
N 88°58'39"E 200.00, �l�( 2-fa'AND �
^� — _ _ �. o� — — s�.ss� �
�v � � 57.05' • 8'ALDER ` � �
Q,�+ � 8'ALDER � p�9 � p� l;�A10�
QP � � T1MN'�-� I 14"OAK p---14"ALDER.__ I _. __4�„_d)_ �
8�_ _ _ 7'ALDER � f s- • �j0 _ . �� - � �-__ ` �
,
SOUTHLIIVEOF �"�ii2"A�FR E$ � PARCEL 3 ��
50'WETL4NDS �, i
suFFERZONF PARCEL 1 ! PARCEL 2 ��;
; 8,188 SQ. FT � �- 7,860 SQ. FT. !� 8,57 4 SQ. FT. ;�
, \ 3 ;�
Y • � _
� 24 ��x �u�� � � Q
ti� p
� ; 6"ALDER��B� R a 16"ALDEA� o kqW/rHORNE CLUMP � O
� � ' /i4"S�E/6`A�� R Y7 g Ig �
�
� �; �S :s�,ar�Eas ;,._,-----__.____.�__..IIEED� . 2003-1 7293 7 ~
p� - . � �� 2:G ALDEF�S .L. 8400)
�a � $ 7 6 i I �--3a"OAK I
�W 1� N � i0'ALDER I J 7Q- N 89°20'S8"E 8.7i'
.. ,
• v •:. .
Q' Q . N g � i2`ALDER rs � � N 89�0'S8"E 81.29' �
_ >>�—�r w
� c. Z .�� 3 � ��2, 27 7��13N� _ --- --
� . 14"AL�R ____.,,..._. 7$�,� S 89 20'S8"W 68°`3 $ �
I _ ,� �1� �`w � � �� � ►
� � TURNAROUND � 1 � EASEMENT � �
N z i
�,., � o � n � � ��� I � I � h�
S 89 0348 W 75.00 � �� �• —
o � \� �0/ ��I � l `— S 89°03'48"W 70.00'
O 1
z I 6"PEAR I �� \ '� f ; ,/ ; � �
/
� � ,
SCALE: 1°=3Q' DEED DOC. N0. C� � ''�� � � �
96-1000?5 � �� � 5 S�u�Wa4K
REGlSTERED T.L. 8300 $ � i F�� � � � $
PROFESS10NAL �� � , i � �i DEED DOG NO. $
LAND SURVEYOR � � i 3� � ' , W 2003-014642 ^
$ � T.L. 8300 �
,
�� g $ � i .$3� � � �
� o o �. a , �
REGON ' g� S�� S � � �ObE-PAVEME►JT �
JULY 11 2006 � Z ' � � N � g
LEEA. P(J GEON H�S� ! � / ► Q q Z
EXPI RES 6/30/08 —'' � I i t i C U 5�
�
I— I - �� � \ ,� � I
PARCEL 1 e + � 2'ROAD DEDICATION '� � � �\� � 2'ROAD DEDICATfON
� l J �6.00� f 7.50 l 20.00 7.5 70.00' —5-.�—
� � S 89°03'48"W 55.00, �
w
�
N ��$
��� o S.W. IVORTH DAKOTA STREET_ � _ —
_ � — � — —
�
N
CURVE RADIUS ARC LENGTH CHORD LENGTH CHORD BEARING DELTA ANGLE TANGENT
l�/�TES C1 35.00' 55.43' 49.61' S 45'34'08" E 90'44'09" 35.45'
. C2 35.00' 54.53' 49.18' N 44'25'52" E 89'15'51" 34.55'
1.ALL BFARIIVGS AND DISTANCES ON THE ATTACHED
SiJRVEY MAP ARE CALCULATED UNLESS SPEC1FfCALLY
SrarEO orHERw►SE. PROJECT: PROPOSED PARTITlON OF
2.ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS REFER TO THE CURAENT TAX DEED DOCUMENT NO.2003-7 7293 7
ASSESSORSMAP iSi35DB.
3.PLA7 800K AND PAGE REFERENCES ARE TO LOCATlON: PART OF LOT 24,ASHBROOK FARM, BEING PART OF THE
w,asHav�ron+CouNrv P�ar RFCORDS. D.C. GRAHAM D.L.C. LOCATED!N THE S.E. 1/4 OF SEC.
35, T 1S., A 1W OF THE W.M., WASHINGTON COUNTY,
4.SURVEY REFERENCES ARE TO WpSHINGTOIV COUNTY OREGON. MAP NO. 1 S 1 35DB
SURVEY RECORDS.
5. WETLANDS BOUNDARY PER ALPHA COMMUNlTY CUENT: DATE: JAN 03,2007
DEVELOPMEN7 AS SHOWN ON PROJECT N0.328-028
DRAWING DATED SEPTEMBER 27,2005. DAN SCHENK SCALE: 1"=30'
7. VEGATATIVE CORRIROR TO BE OWNED IN COMMON BY J08 NUMBER: 04-4148
PARCELS i,2,,aNO 3. LEGEND
LOVE LAND SURVEYS, INC.
— CENTERLINE OF ROAD OR STREET i415 WASHINGTON OREGON CITY, OREGON 97045 (503)656-4915
�
S;{� .�il,�,� �3 ���s s.�v � ,���o�
0' 30' 60' 90'
SCALE. 1��-30� ASH�f�C�OK FARMS
BK 2. P�' �3
SOUTH LINE OF WETLANDS AS
DETERMINED BYALPHA COMMUNITY C)EVELOPMENT
N QU°4 i'44"E i2�o,aK� N 88°58'39"E 200.00� —'
6,00'(M)5.98'(PP) Tyy�
� ii �� �t3'ALDER � 12"ALDERS �
TRACT B 7Vy��ALDER 7YV1N�p�� N O
?� � VEGITATION CORRIDOR ALDERS � o �
$�. ��w ��ss�w�� � �, �Q o�
J o 6,405 SQ. �. oo ,�
Qj � 12"ALDER \�,` �-��-10"OAK Zr"', E-
N 88°58'39"E 200.00' ����- 2- ra"AND .�
�j - 81.30' 61.66'
�V � 57.05' • 8„A� � �` �' I(
QP�� ii �vER�IN � II 14"OAl< p---i4"ALt7FF3 �I �
� 7"ALDER ' � I
SOUTH LINE OF i 12"ALDER i � c��
5a wEr�vvos , �M PARCEL 2 � PAl�CEL 3 ��
BUFFER ZONE PARCEL 1 ,o � 8,5�4 SQ. FT. Ti
STO R M �A1 N A G� 8, 1 8 8 S Q. F T, i� � 7,8 6 0 S Q. F T. � ��
' 24°OAK-- = 20"OAK � p o
� 6"ALDER-y�8 ALDER �g 16"ALDER--�-�v� � HAWTHORNE CLUMP �� �
� lo 0
i" f f 4"'����6"ALDER I o � z �
W �� Z i —'
� 4/ � p�-.,2:6"ALDERS �Z ~
� �^ Q ' DEED D4t;,. �'JO. � 2003-1 7293 7
�7- i
� i3 6„ALD�R \ 2:6"ALDERS 1 1 `'.�'. 8400�
I
�W � �$ 10"ALDER I I _ _ � _ - - -- �`—34"OAK _ -- _ �� � N 89°20'S8"E 8.71' i
a � N �o � � _ N 89°20'S8" 81.29' _, T� �w
� Q Q\ t 2 ALDER ` , � �_ h�'�-- ,��,^� � �
� � I�� ` y4"ALDER g '7V75°p J2L_ ,S892 '58" y '���� � o �' �c�1E� �-1WS��,.�- �
� �- o I - SPl�1`�R CA I�
� TURNAROUND i I i "�
O �I o r u ? _'\ l i� I � � � �•: � _ /!
N ; � _ ��
�– S 8 9 0 3 4 8 W 7 5.0 0 --- �� � '_--- S g g°0 3'4 8"W 7 0.0� — (
° p o��� �6 �� � ��I v':,`�% i
� � `; s�P� , � � ���� � � y��� , � �
z , \ � \ ;��� ', � i
\ � I i � I ' ,
„ , DEED DOC. N0. ��� I�, �
SCALE: 1 =30 g6-100015 Ico � � � ��
T.L. 8300 g ,cv� �cv' � S
REGlSTERED �d iT� I^, I � a
PROFESSIONAL °' � � o� DEED DOC. NO. o
LAND SURVEYOR � ��� �i � � W 2003-014642 ^
$ $ Ig� , o � T.L. 8300 �
i I a
� .,..--�—____ S o ��� a i N S�W'�� LJ k� �
REGON $ 'o� i S�W��2 tAS�M�uT o
JULY 11 2006 Z `z� - ,�, I i � (vt�tV 1+0�.� CESt,) o
LEE A. SPLJRGEON Z
_ � I
EXPIRES 6/30/08 Y � � � i
' i i I
e � �� � � , � i � � �v�� �tE-r�+:s I
1 I 2'ROAD DEDICATION
PARCEL 1 Q l j 2'ROAD DEDfCATlO� � , � � � � l � �� _5.00'_
� � 17.50 .00 i f 7._� ,/ �o.oa
� _ -- 75.00' ---- S 89°03'48"W 55.00' --
w •
N g�$
�I`�' �.� ���nTi i nn�inTA cTDC�T �;,�L�TNKy SEI+I/E!z 7 _
� � � Vv 1y� ir-Y ! � � iKn� i� ..�.�-- —
� _ �_... ___
. �
N
CURVE RADIUS ARC LENGTH CHORD LcNGT'H CHORD BEARING DELTA ANGLE TANGENT
NQrES C1 35.00' 55.43' 49.81' S 45'34'08" E 90'44'09" 35.45'
C2 35.00' 54.53' 49.18' .__ N 44'25'52" E 89'15'51" 34.55'
1.ALL BF�IRINGS AND DISTANCES ON THE ATTACHED
SURVEY MAP ARE CALCULATED UNLESS SPECIFIK;ALLY
Sr,aTEO oTHERwisE. PROJECT: PROPOSED PARTITION OF �
2.ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS REFER TO THE CURRENT TAX DEED DOCUMENT NO. 2003-1 7293 7
ASSESSORS MAP 1S135DB.
3.PLAT BODK AND PAGE REFERENCES ARE TO LOCA7ION: PAR��.)f= LOT 24, ASHBROOK FARM, BEINC PART OF THE
wASHiN�roN couNnPL,arRECOADS. D.C. t��B�HAM D.LC. LOCATED!N THE S.E. 1/4 OF SEC.
35, � 3�, R 1 W OF THE W.M., WASHINGTON COUNTY,
4.SURVEY REFERENCES ARE TO WASHINGTON GC)UNTY OREG�?�#. MAP NO. 1 S 1 35D8
SIJRVEY RECORDS.
5. WETLANDS BOUNDARY PER ALPHA COMMUNI7Y CLIENT.' DATE: JAN 03, 2007
�-
DEVELOPMENTAS SHOWN ON PROJECT N0.328-028 DAN SCHEd�� 1"=30'
DRA WING DATED SEPTEMBER 27,2oos. SCALE:
7.VEGAT,4TlVE CORRIROR TO BE OWNED IN COMMON BY JOB NUMBER: 04-4148
PARCELS 1,z,,�wo a. LEGEND
LOVE LAND SURVEYS, lNC.
— --- CENTERLINE OF ADAD OR STREET 1415 WASH1NG�c�l�` OREGON CITY, OREGON 97045 (503) 656-4915
• �
I � S 0��} C�.
. ,
.
r � i CGti. � o �1
lNTERSECT/ON SIGHT DISTANCE CERTlFlCATION
October 25, 2006
City of Tigard
CD- Development Engineering
13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223
503-639�171 Fax: 503-624-0752
http://www.tiqard-or.qov
Attn: Kim McMullen
RE: SW North Dakota and SW 93`� Street, Daniel Schenk Project—
Sight Distance Certification
Case Number: MLP 2006-00003
The access for this proposal is located at the site's southern property line, on SW
North Dakota Street. The speed limit along SW North Dakota Street is 25 M.P.H.,
based upon the posted speed limit, requiring 250 feet of sight distance in both
directions, in accord with Tigard Development Code Section 18.705.030.H.1.
As required by Code Sections 18.705.030.H.1, sight distance from the access to
SW 91 St Street Court was measured to be 310 feet to the east of the access and
from the west at SW 93�d Street to be 320 feet. The Code Section requires that
measurements be based on an eye height of 3.5 feet and an object height of
4.25 feet above the road; and be assumed to be 10 feet from the near edge of
pavement to the front of a stopped vehicle, (actual measurement is taken 15 feet
from pavement edge).
In conclusion, I hereby certify that the intersection sight distance at the proposed
access for the Daniel Schenk Pro�ect conforms to the requirements for sight
distance as set forth in the Tigard Development Code.
����� P�� ��
�,I N ��
� c �, ; :�
Steve Roper P.E. - � w s , 5 �� �
oxE
: �'J,�'�JD�' 1��� , ,�
' ��FiV �, R�'e�
�x���z�^: �2-_��-olo
C:1Documents and SettingsUnichellemWly DocumentsUunklINTERSECTION SIGHT DISTANCE CERTIFICATION.doc
�.� � a
�
,
� r
� � c �
.
, , � File Number
\�
C1eanWater Services 05-005130
Our commitment is clear
Clean Water Services
Service Provider Letter
Jurisdiction Washington Count r� Date May 01, 2006
Map & Tax Lot 1S135D608400 Applicant Marilyn Adair &
Site Address 9175 SW North Dakota St Daniel Schenk
Tigard, OR 97223-6523 Address 7115 SW Virginia Av
3-lot partition for single family Portland, OR 97219
Proposed Activity residences with tract Phone 503-246-7277
This form and the attached conditions will serve as your Service Provider Letter in
accordance with Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (R8�0 04-9).
_ _ __ ____ .. _ _ __ ..__
YES NO ' YES NO
___ _ _ . _ __ . __ . ___ _ __.... _ . ___ _ _ : __;
Natur�I R�'SGufCBS � ❑ Alternatives Analysis �
Assessment (NRA) X Required �
' Submitted , (Section 3.02.6)
, _ _ __ _ .__ _. ;. _ _ __ _ _ _ : __ _:.. ....
District Site Visit i
' Date: � ❑X ' Tier 1 Alternatives Analysis : a �
Concur with NRA/or a ❑ Tier 2 Alternatives Analysis ❑ ' �
submitted information �
Sensitive Area Present
On-Site � � Tier 3 Alternatives Analysis ❑ a
. - .. . _ . _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _
Sensitive Area Present Vegetated Corridor
; Off-Site � � , Averaging � �
. _ _ .._ ___ ..._.._ __..:____.__._ . _ _ . _.. _:_ _ _ _ _..:
Vegetated Corridor a ❑ , Vegetated Corridor ❑ a
; Present On-Site ' Mitigation Required
, _... _ _ __....... .. _ _..._ --- ;... ..... ._.. . . _.. ... .. ;. __..... _..._;
Width of Vegetated j ;
Corridor (feet) 50 feet ': On-Site Mitigation , � � �
. __ __ _ __ . _ _ __. __ _ __ __ _ ___ _.. ______. __ :
' Condition of Vegetated GoodlDegraded Off-Site Mitigation � �
; Corridor ( � �
,. _.._.... . _._ . _._.__... _ , ___ _. ..._ . __ ;_ __._ .. . __ ;. ............ T :.
Enhancement Required � ;; ❑ Planting Plan Attached ❑ ; �
_. . :...
�
__ _ . _... .. _..._... , _ __. . _ ...... , __ ........ . _
Encroachment into � EnhancemenUrestoration
Vegetated Corridor ❑ � April 15, 2007
; (Section 3.02.4) completion date
. _ _ ___ _ _ __ ;.. __ _ ._ _ ___... _ __.._ :
, Type and Square Footage None Allowed Geotechnical Report ❑ � � �
of Encroachment ' required
_ � . _
_ _. _..._ _ __._. _..__... .
Allowed Use ' '
(Section 3.02.4) � �X Conditions Attached � � �
_._ _. .__ ._._.. _ . __ . __ _ __..._..._ _.._ , _ :. _.
This Service Provider Letter does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect
water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered on your
property.
Page 1 of 4
File Number
05-005130
In order to comply with Clean Water Services (the District) water quality
protection requirements the project must comply with the following conditions:
1 No structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals,
uncontained areas of hazardous materials as defined by Oregon Department of Environmental
Quality, pet wastes, dumping of materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted within the
sensitive area which may negatively impact water quality, except those allowed by Section 3.02.3.
2 No structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals,
uncontained areas of hazardous materials as defined by Oregon Department of Environmental
Quality, pet wastes, dumping of materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted within the
vegetated corridor which may negatively impact water quality, except those allowed by Section
3.02.4.
3. Prior to any site clearing, grading or construction the vegetated corridor and water quality
sensitive areas shall be surveyed, staked, and temporarily fenced per approved plan. During
construction the vegetated corridor shall remain fenced and undisturbed except as allowed by
Section 3.02.5 and per approved plans.
4. Prior to any activity within the sensitive area, the applicant shall gain authorization for the project from
the Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL) and US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The applicant
shall provide the District or its designee (appropriate city) with copies of all DSL and USACE project
authorization permits. None Proposed
5. An approved Oregon Department of Forestry Notification is required for one or more trees harvested
for sale, trade, or barter, on any non-federal lands within the State of Oregon.
6. Appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's) for Erosion Control, in accordance with the CWS
Erosion Control Technical Guidance Manual shall be used prior to, during, and following earth
disturbing activities.
7. Prior to construction, a Stormwater Connection Permit from the District or its designee is required
pursuant to Ordinance 27, Section 4.B.
8. The District or City/County shall require an easement over the vegetated corridor conveying storm,
surface water management, and/or sanitary sewer rights to the District or City that would prevent the
owner of the vegetated corridor from activiiies and uses Inconsistent with the purpose of the corridor
and any easements therein.
9. Activities located within the 100-year floodplain shall comply with Section 3.13 of R&O 04-9.
10. Removal of native, woody vegetation shall be limited to the greatest extent practicable.
11. Removal of invasive non-native species by hand is required in all vegetated corridors rated
"good". Replanting is required in any cleared areas larger than 25 square feet.
12. Should final development plans differ significantly from those submitted for review by the District, the
applicant shall provide updated drawings, and if necessary, obtain a revised Service Provider Letter.
Page 2 of 4
File Number
OS-005130
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
13. The vegetated corridor width for sensitive areas within the project site shall be a minimum of
50 feet wide, as measured horizontally from the delineated boundary of the sensitive area.
14. For vegetated corridors up to 50 feet wide, the entire vegetated corridor shall be equal to or
better than a "good" corridor condition as defined in Section 3.02.7,Table 3.2.
15. Clean Water Services shall be notified 72 hours prior to the start and completion of
enhancement/restoration activities. EnhancemenUrestoration activities shall comply with the
guidelines provided in Landscape Requirements (R&0 04-9: Appendix D).
16. Prior to installation of plant materials, all invasive vegetation within the vegetated corridor
shall be removed. During removal of invasive vegetation care shall be taken to minimize
impacts to existing native trees and shrub species.
17. Enhancement/restoration of the vegetated corridor shall be provided in accordance with R80
04-9, Appendix D.
18, Prior to any site clearing, grading or construction, the applicant shall provide the District with
the required vegetated corridor enhancemenUrestoration plan in compliance with R8�0 04-9.
19. Maintenance and monitoring requirements shall comply with Section 2.11.2 of R&O 04-9. If at any
time during the warranty period the landscaping falls below the 80% survival level, the Owner shall
reinstall all deficient planting at the next appropriate planting opportunity and the two year
maintenance period shall begin again from the date of replanting.
20. Performance assurances for the vegetated corridor shall comply with Section 2.06.2, Table 2-1 and
Section 2.10, Table 2-2.
21. For any developments, which create multiple parcels or lots intended for separate ownership, the
District may require that the sensitive area and vegetated corridor be contained in a separate tract
and subject to a "STORM SEWER, SURFACE WATER, DRAINAGE AND DETENTION EASEMENT
OVER ITS ENTIRETY" to be granted to the city or Clean Water Services.
22. The water quality swale and detention pond shall be planted with District approved native species.
and designed to blend into the natural surroundings.
CONDITIONS TO BE INCLUDED ON CONSTRUCTION PLANS
23. Final construction plans shall include landscape plans. Plans shall include in the details a description
of the methods for removal and control of exotic species, location, distribution, condition and size of
plantings, existing plants and trees to be preserved, and installation methods for plant materials.
Plantings shall be tagged for dormant season identification. Tags to remain on plant material after
planting for monitoring purposes.
24. A Maintenance Plan shall be included on final plans including methods, responsible party contact
information, and dates (minimum two times per year, by June 1 and September 30).
Page 3 of 4
, . . , File Number
05-005130
25. Final construction plans shall cieariy depict the location and dimensions of the sensitive area and the
vegetated corridor (indicating good, marginal, or degraded condition). Sensitive area boundaries
shall be marked in the field.
26. Protection of the vegetated corridors and associated sensitive areas shall be provided by the
installation of permanent fencing and signage between the development and the outer limits
of the vegetated corridors. Fencing details to be included on final construction plans.
This Service Provider Letter is not valid unless CWS-approved site plan is attached.
Please call (503) 681-5106 with any questions.
/ C1,,,.,ez� `�`-' � ,
Damon W. Reische
Environmental Plan Review
Attachments ( 2 )
Page 4 of 4
. �
0' 3�' 60' 90' �
� _ � � � � sH�R ooK FA�M s �
SCALE: 1"=30'
SOUTH L1NE OF WEfLfWDS AS B K �. PG 3 3
DETERMINED BYALPHA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT �a
T
RP�roxr
N 88°58'39"E 200.00' � Cg� �°G�� . C°'^�'`� '•.
� ��o��a�o� Co�r;e�r (D)(HELD) 1 � _
Noa°4744-�E�— � e,r.�^ccw�w� ('e �.�•r � ° '• ' �'��� �
s.oa�n-tJ � . $� • � • �. :$ �'� +1
� 5.98'(PP) � \ vEG�r,4 E COR �OR � 0�.•' ��, g � `� ;� �`�; , 1 o
�j I � �\ 8405 SQ. 1--1'� S 57'24"E Q�� $ �. �`� 11 gi•. .��$• �� \ N
3.01' ��� � �� � � cv � 00
m II
� � 'Qo�1�2�"E S 82 57'24"E- ' � ��>�o�L?47.�i��',�•J..or3' ��'•, 4 � J
N g�°14'14"E N C C/�,�OqO � L=21.8G l I-:
r� 31.68� \2�7�' H�'9�QRGN���w �_31.79' l
v \ 17.92'
�� S 49°43'15"E �=61.7r , 31.25�
L=
QP � rv�s°ar2s�E 2.sa� ��HORO BRG
16'W
SOUTH LINE OF 3.93' S 80°� CHORD L=21.69'
50'WFTLANDS � p NO. ��p� c�9` CHORD BRG v
BUFFER ZONE ,� DEED DOC. a? 1.a�����G S 87°96'43'W �
ro 3 � �GN G pP��•�N �
� � _ a� S 5� a
^ N $ PARCEL 2 � 2003-172937 �
Q• �� � g o TOTAL: 9,�ss sQ.Fr. o (T.L. 8400) $ g
t C� (0.2248 AC.) N �
Q' h� o z PARCEL 1 Z POLE: 2,��S�.�. �O z
A N TOTAL: 9,359 SQ.FT. ROAD DED: 38 SQ.FT. O �
q•� � � (0.2149AC.) N�� �,s�5 sQ.�. 2 PARCEL 3 1-
1� ° o r��ac.) ror,aL: s,401 SG}.FT.
ti O POLE: 1,764 SQ.FT. � •
y �� � Z RDAD DED: 36 SQ.FT. (0.2158 AC.) �
� POLE: i,764 SO.F7:
Q,. N NE(: 7,559 SQ.FT. ROAD DED: 36 SQ.Ff. v
Q' (0.1744 AC.) — N 89 20'S8"E 90.00' W
Q � — NEf.• 7,601 SQ.FT:
O � S�24�---28 2 13��� 3 (0.1745 AC.) �
) o �
o ' 8 5�ta „ °3� $ �
� ,� $I� 3� F ........... IS6s � � g 1 �
O /L Z� TURIYAROL/IVD � � EASEMENT � z �
O �l� ���♦ .�\\ � � I Fr ���� `�
z �\ s as°o3�as��w�s.00� / � .. c� �;�� .. '\ o , „ , �
� � S B9 0348 W 70.00 �
� / � \ � � I � �
' l ; . � � 1� -_� 5'SIDEWALK
EASEMENT
SCALE: 1"=30' � � � I i
REG/STERED o ni N i $ $
PROFESSlONAL °p � �, g DEED DOC. NO.
LAND SURVEYOR g °� � �S � $
DEED DOC. NO. g � = i W w 2003-014642
, g 96-100015 � o � � g � � � T.L. 8300 S
� � r.L. a3o0 $ � �° � � � �
� , � g � $
J OREB �66 � o � 2 2 � g `�
RICH�IS S. LOVE �� z 2 � � j
EXPIRES i2/3f/06 G°� g � ;
v P � � '
Q-� � I I 1� l � ` , � j �r � I I
� � � �5.00� � 18.00�� � is.00' �18.00� l l �o.00' — 5.00�
W 17.50' 20.00' 17.50' + — —
- � `� S 89°03'48"W 55.00'
Approved o I° N 2'40ADDEDICATION
Clean Water ervi '
°�i �,,,�,� �� _ _ — — — —
B Date
L � N
NOTES CURVE RADIUS ARC LENGTH CHORD LENGTH CHORD BEARING DELTA ANGLE TANGENT
C1 35.00' S5.43' 49.81' S 45'34'08" E 90'44'09" 35.45'
C2 35.00' S4.53' 49.18' N 44'25'S2" E 89'15'S1" 34.55'
1.ALL BEARlNGS AND DISTANCES ON TNE ATTACHED
SURVEY MAP ARE CALCUL4TED UNLESS SPECIFlCALLY
sr,arF�orr-�ERwrs�. PR�JECT.• PROPOSED PARTlT10N QF
2.ALL TAX LQT NUMBERS REFER TD TNE CURRENT Tf1X � � DEED DOCUMENT NO. 2003-1 7293 7
ASSESSORS MAP 1S135DB. D �
3.PLAT BOOK AND PAGE AEFERENCES ARE TO � �-'� LOCATION: PART OF LOT 24,ASHBROOK FARM, BEING PART OF THE
WASHINGTON CDUN7Y PLAT RECOROS. t� �n D.C. GR,4HAM D.L.C. LOCATED IN THE S.E. 1/4 OF SEC.
� ° "� 35, T 1S., R 1W OF THE W.M., WASHINGTON COUNTY,
4.StIRVEY REFERENCFS ARE 70 WASHINGTON COUNTY ,
SURVEY RECORDS. o �=-- OREGON. MAP N0. 1 S 135D8
0
�s' �I:r-�t ii
5. WETLANDS 80UNDARY PER ALPHA COMMUNlTY - � CLIENT: DATE: APRlL 3, ZOO6
DEVELOPMENT AS SHQWN ON PROJECT NO.328-028 �'='" '
DRAWING DATED SEPTEMBER 27,2005. �---�— �� DAN SCHENK 7�=30�
SCALE:
7. VEGATATIVE CORRIROR TO 8E OWNED!N COMMON BY JOB NUMBER: 04-4148
PARCELS 1,2,,arvo s. LF_UEND
. LOVE LAND SURVEYS, INC.
— CENTERLINE OF ROAD OR STREET 1415 WASHINGTON OREGON CITY, OREGON 97045 (503)656-4975
I
�
� or � s
� o �
HALSTE�' �"S
A R BO R I C U LTU R E ��S preservation of t eesand
CONSULTANTS, INC.
�� David Halstead,Consultant,B.S.
R, ;r�,.
Phillip Whitcomb,Consultant ���° a -��;�'"'�
� P.O.Box 1182•Tualatin,OR 97062 �•��
� (503)245-1383 I� 1I `;. � '';':�,�
CI-fY �:�:= _�:r-{,��D
PLANNIfV�/�NG�r��cR�NG
►
'' July 17, 2006
� Mr. Dan Schenk
/ 7115 SW Virgina Avenue
Portland OR 97219
Reference: Tree Assessment for Proposed Development
Location: 9250 SW North Dakota Street
� ' -� Tigard, Oregon
Subject: Tree Survey/Mitigation Report
' Mr. Philip Hickey certified arborist for Halstead's Arboriculture Consultants
�t, and I have inspected the trees, the site and reviewed the site plan "Ash
,. � Brook Farms", dated June 27, 2006.
�' The purpose of this inspection was to identify and assess the preservation
� � ,+ potential of all trees six inches in trunk diameter (measured at four feet
`I above ground) and larger in accordance with the City of Tigard's Tree
' Ordinance Chapter 18.790.
�
� We have visually inspected, tagged and numbered all trees, both in the
field, on the site plan, within this report and will be using R42171 through
I R42197 series tags for easy identification. In addition, we have added a
� � {� "Tree Characteristic Guide", field report of each tree and/or group af trees
that will explain in detail the tree conditions.
Our inspection criteria included: Tree species, crown structure and
development, storm damage, insect and disease problems, overall
structural integrity, root system development, wind throw potential,
construction trauma resistance and approximate distance to existing
targets. Limb spread diameters are specified in order to determine the
� required "Tree Protection Fencing" (TPZ). In addition, the tree trunk
�' diameters were measured at ground level, (DGL) in order to provide a true
� diamete� of the trees' overall size.
Email: hacC�spiritone.com
www.halsteadsarboriculture.com
CCB#0068646
Page 2
July 17, 2006
Reference: Tree Assessment for Proposed Development
Location: 9250 SW North Dakota Street
Tigard, Oregon
Subject: Tree Survey/Mitigation Repo�t
TREE ASSESSMENT:
There are a total of twenty seven (27) numbered trees Iocated within the
project boundaries. There are ninteen (19) trees within the property that
are twelve inches or less in diameter and an additional one (1) tree that is
twelve inches and greater in diameter, which is hazardous.
This leaves a residual of seven (7) trees within the proposed boundaries
that are larger than twelve inches in trunk diameter and are preservable.
Ninteen trees under twelve (12) inches in diameter are as follows:
Tree Number: 71, 73, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 81, 82, 83, 86, 87, 88, 89, 92, 93,
95, 96 and 97.
Hazardous Trees:
The following tree is over twelve inches in diameter at 4.5 feet above
ground and is listed as hazardous due to severe trunk and limb splitting,
dead trunks and dead limbs that are un-repairable and in accordance to
Chapter 187.90.020 "A" number three of the City of Tigard's Standards. If
additional information is required of an individual tree's condition, please
refer to the enclosed "Tree Characteristic Guide".
One Hazardous tree is listed as follows
Tree Number: 90.
Page 3
July 17, 2006
Reference: Tree Assessment for Proposed Development
Location: 9250 SW North Dakota Street
Tigard, Oregon
Subject: Tree SurveylMitigation Report
Preserved Trees:
Seven trees over 12 inches in diameter and are preservable are as
follows:
Tree Number: 72, 74, 80, 84, 85, 91 and 94.
TREE CARE AND PRESERVATION:
MEETINGS:
Before the site clearing and construction begins a City of Tigard approved
tree removal and preservation site plan will be furnished to the Project
Certified Arborist.
In addition, a pre-construction tree preservation conference will be held
on-site with the general contractor in charge of tree removal, and/or in
charge of heavy equipment, the Project Certified Arborist, and the City
Forester from the City of Tigard.
PURPOSE:
The purpose of the on-site meeting will be to introduce all parties to the
specifications and sensitivity needed in the protection and preservation of
trees, their environment, and the protected areas.
Page 4
July 17, 2006
Reference: Tree Assessment for Proposed Development
Location: 9250 SW North Dakota Street
Tigard, Oregon
Subject: Tree Survey/Mitigation Report
PREPARATION / FENCING:
Tree fencing needs to be attached to 7-foot tall steel fence posts placed
eight feet apart on center forming a protective line around the preserved
trees. Fence posts need to be securely anchored in the soil to a depth of
two feet. Once in place and approved the fencing will not be adjusted or
removed without the consent of the Project Consulting Arborist. The
fencing, as described, will need to be maintained throughout the entirety of
the project.
In addition the following "TPZ" Ref: City of Tigard's Tree Ordinance
Chapter 18.790 will be observed.
"THE FOLLOWING C�ND1T10NS SHALL BE ONGOING
REQUIRMENTS THROUGHOUT THF PROJECT FROM ON-S1TE
lMPROVMENTS TO FINAL BUILD/NG INSPECTlON
Submit to the City Forester: ATTN.: Mr. Matt Stein, City of Tigard,
Oregon 93125 SW Hal! Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 Fx 503.684.8840 Ph
503.639.4171 ext. 2589
60: The property owner/applicant and their assigns are responsible for
complying with the following requirement:
The Project Arborist shall inspecf the site at a minimum of every two
weeks, and af times when intrusions into the TPZ are required. The
Project Arborist shal!submit written reports to the City Forester a minimum
of once every two weeks, as he monitors the construction activities and
progress.
Page 5
J u ly 17, 2006
Reference: Tree Assessment for Proposed Development
Location: 9250 SW North Dakota Street
Tigard, Oregon
Subject: Tree Survey/Mitigation Report
These reports shall include any changes that may have occurred to the
TPZ as well as indicate the condition and location of the tree protection
fencing. If the amount of TPZ was reduced, then the Project Arborist shall
justify why the fencing was moved, and shall certify that the construction
acfivities to the trees did not adversely impact the overa/l and long term
health and stability of the tree(s).
"If the reports are not submitted or received by the City Forester at the
scheduled intervals, and if it appears the TPZ's or the Tree Protection
Plan is not being followed by the contracfor, the City can stop work on the
project until an inspection can be done by the City Forester and the
Project Arborist and appropriate remedies can be imposed, If necessary.
This inspection will be to evaluate the tree protection fencing, determine if
the fencing was moved at any point during construction, and determine if
any part of the Tree Protection Plan has been vio/ated".
REMOVALS:
All trees six (6) inches in diameter and greater that are structurally
unsound, unhealthy, or removed through mitigation within the preservation
areas, will need to be approved by the City of Tigard and removed under
the direct supervision of the Project Consulting Arborist for this project.
Tree removal will be done in such a way so as to not damage preserved
trees and their root zones. Removal of these trees may require climbing
the trees and taking them down in small pieces. Stumps of the removed
trees, which are less than 15 feet from a preserved tree, will be ground out
using a stump grinder.
Page 6
July 17, 2006
Reference: Tree Assessment for Proposed Development
Location: 9250 SW North Dakota Street
Tigard, Oregon
Subject: Tree Survey/Mitigation Report
THERAPEUTIC CARE:
Therapeutic care is described as those treatments including pruning that
will be needed to increase the preserved trees chances for survival. In
order to accomplish this objective, the trees will have to be periodically
inspected during the construction process.
Individual treatment is based on the trees needs, its root zone, and
structural condition and health. Factors will be taken into consideration,
such as species, soil compaction, season in which construction is done,
how much root zone will be affected by construction, losses of surrounding
native plantings and loss of and/or over abundance of surface and sub-
surface water.
The success of any project where trees are a factor is good
communication befin►een the general contractor and the Project Consulting
Arborist who will be on site and/or on call for the entire project.
Sincerely,
C��c;/�
Philip Hickey BS, CA PN-1604A
David Halstead BS, CA PN-0146A, ASCA
f.�t•u Sc G«cc(�
S�� .�Y � 7�77
0' 30' 60' 90'
� A s���oox ���M s
SCALE: 1"-30'
SOUTH LINE OF WETLANDS AS 8 K 2. PG 3 3
DETERMlNED BYALPNA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ��
� N 88°58'39"E 200.00` TREE 92 TREE 93 � � � �
N 00°41'44"E_— / �
6.00'(M) / � � TREE 96 ��
� 5.s8-�PP� / \ VEGArArrvEconarooR \ \ � o
b� � �., � 6405S0.FT. TREE 94 TREE 95 � 1
° MEAN 80UNDARY OF VEGATATIVE CORRIDOK \ ��
m � `� TREE 87 � � �
t3 1 �;
� I 1=
� �— ��88°58'39"E 200.00' - � l
��� � � 81.30� : 6,.66� r
57.0,5' \ Q ',
QP� � TREE 88 �_� � � TREE 90 � i �
7"ALDER TREE 89 � TREE 91
SOUTNLINEOF TREE 86 �
50'WETL4NDS DEE`D DOC. «� NO. �
BUFFER ZONE p �
� o TREE 83 E 84 � Q� TREE 85 TREE 97 °a � �
o � �i ui �
� r TREE 82� g � .� o
� � p � c�, PARCEL 2 � N
� � TREE 80 TREE 81 ° TOTAL: 10,Oa2 SQ.FT. � $ ' o O
Q� � z p (0.2305 AC.) N ZD03-172937 0 0 �
Q' �Q � ��T R E E 7 8 z pOLE: 2,140SQ.Ff. o (T.L. 8400) � Z �
� " �� f3–�--TREE 77 ROAD DED: 38 SQ.FT. z o �
�q N�r: �,asa so.Fr.
� � � TREE 79 I a\, TREE 76 (0.1805AC.) PARCEL 3 Z
�V d. TOTAL: 9,429 SO.FT. �
G cv -� ' Q!� TREE 72 � �o.2is5 ac.) �
QQ.�' � � TREE 75 / N 89 20'58"E 90.00' POLE: 1,764 SQ.FT. w
� a TREE 74 ----T– I � AOAD DEO: 36 SO.Ff.
_ � � ��7_24, a.QS ,��� . NET: 7.629 S�.FT. �
p /\ TREE 73 � o`S�5°pq� , 2 g°37��3 � c� (0.1751 AC.1 `�
N / �I� 32F .......... i56 � I �
o /� / � TURNAROUPJD 1'�� j F1ISEMENT � z
2
� I
° �— � •.•���s••• ��� � •y���•••• '�� TREE ASSESSMENT
Z �` S 89°03'48"W 75.00' '! � '� �%�` �� ,� S 8�
I s"PEAR � � � � I � Tree Location Map
\ / i ' �--�_
,_ , PARCEL i 1 �. r , SITE LOCATION:
scAtE: ��-30 � � ,
TOTAL: 9,os2 sc1. Fr. � ^ i o 9250 SW North Dakota Street
REGISTERED (0.2095AC.) g � � � Ti ard, Ore on
PROFESSIONAL . POLE: 1:765 SQ.FT: oo ^ ^ i � � 9 9
ROAD DED� 36 SO.FI: � � � � i
LAND SURVEYOR W "
NET: 7,28t so.Fr. S � o o � = w July 17, 2006
/� °o (0.1671 AC.) `� � O o � p 'v
/ � p `r N N N c'
`� --ti,o� � � o � o o � o ' Halstead's Arboriculture
OREGON o o � � q � o � Consultants, Inc.
o � Z z �I cn
RICH R�S OVE ,, DEED DQG. NO. z� 2 ��
EXPlRES i2/31/06 `P 96-100U1� g �
r.�. 83nv
�� P�� � � z� I � 1
P�L � I ' 1 ` i ' ! I�
Q \ l � 18.00' 19.00' 18.00' 1 � �o.00� � 5.00�
�5.00' - - -
w . 17.50' 20.00' 17.50' -
g I S 89°03'48'W 55.00'
g ►c� 2'ROAD DEDICATION
�� N
��
� — Q — — — —. � —
�
N
CURVF RADIUS ARC LENGTH CHORD LENGTH CHORD BEARING DELTA ANGLE TANGENT
NOTES C1 _ 35.00' 55.43' 49.81' S 45'34'08" E 90'44'09" 35.45'
C2 35.00' 54.53' 49.18' N 44'25'S2" E 89'15'S1" 34.55'
1.ALL BEARfNGS AND DISTANCES ON THE ATTACNED
SURVEY MAP ARE CALCULATED UNLESS SPECfFICALLY
STATED OTNERWISE. FROJECT: PF�OPOSED PARTITlON OF
2.ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS i�EFEA TO TNE CURRENT TAX DEED P.00UMElVT NO. 2003-1 7293 7
ASSESSORS M,4P 1 S 135DB.
3.PtAT BOOK AND PAGE REFERENCES ARE TO LOCATION: PART OF LOT 24, ASHBROOK FARM, BEf NG PART OF THE
�vASHrnrGroN CouNrr PuT RECOR�s. D.C. GRAHAM D.L C. LOCATED IN THE S.E 1/4 OF SEC.
4.SURVEY REFERENCES ARE TO WASHINGTON COUNTY
35, T 1 S., R 1 W OF THE W.M., WASHINGTON COUNTY,
Su�vEV RECOROS. OREGON. MAP NO 1 S 1 35D8 ,
5. WETLANDS 80UNDARY PER ALPNA COMMUNI7Y CLIENT: DATE: JUNE 27, 2006
DEVELOPMENT AS SHOWN ON PROJECT NO.328-028
DRAWf/VG DATED SEPTEMBER 27,2005. DAN SCHENK
SCALE: 1"=30'
7.VEGATATIVE CORRlROR TO BE OWNED IN COMMON 8Y JOB NUMBEA: 04-4148
PARCELS 1,2,�wo s. LEGEND
LOVE LAND SURVEYS, INC.
— CENTERLii4E OF ROAD OR STREET 14 i5 WASHINGTON OREGON CITY, OREGON 97045 (503)656-49 i5
HAZ " HA1��AT�OR��L3't�E CaNSi3i N�S .
-- t�E
,_ __ __. ----.
.
TrPeNwnber_ ���_ Specaes: D�eaa��" ►,Jl,:�"o��(-�p� - � - -_
,y
� ����.�T�uMc��_H�=D�a Lmb Sp�d:�� .
Crown Class:Domina,rt: Co-DominanG Induded:
Speciak SPecamen' hlt�oria Slreet Tnee:_� ' � � .
Health Ratiog:7� S�ur+e R�ng f�Root.StruChJre RSting:_(20%-40%HBZtree�--50%-70%
r+equir�es profesional care) _ . _ _
. �mS�:Pro Ca� Cm�rn Reduc$d;_Flus�p�_T� .
, compv�s�g i�raorx -- -' -
,CR��UN�C7S:fn�ca�e p�af ir�uai�and�e�air�y(���mRSOd�T�ioar) . _ �
_ DEF�CF - RCQf C�YIN TRtA�M SGAFEQLDS BRANCNES
,:
PoacfaauY '. -_ ,
.
Bow.�neep
. �
MWHPfe at�adN�s .
krh�dcd 6�tk . .
�:"Eu�veendrreigM
-�
fian0eis �
� .
Wo�slsaam _
, .... .. _
�p!'
Carily
��
;LooaefQadRd 6ark
: ;-N�[�g hoidJ6ee hiue
-.�:: ,
, De�dwoodfatuhs
' ,Borer'.J�fa�s
` '�
. ;:Rrerin�f.du� �
` HAZARD RATING [F,allt - - _ �9-Fiam var6ral O r�nal El aaaa�ral p� Sa�t�ing: v -N Lran dkectlon:
Tree Part aeost�oelr 10(aik Eal�as po�a�6aE t�ar,2-a�mdanS�t 4se�re�e
�ae,�_an� � oe�r s�a�r �-���s�2-s-�s-{.is-as�k .�
H� Fai�ae PoOd�l+S�e af�al+Taget Rafag=i#md i�g 3-7$.�'{�-75 cmk 4->30"(75 cm)..:.,
,..
O�}� � 4 .... + s S�� �� `G�16P�Z—���.� '
3-��4-mta�arKvse....._"..
HAZARD:ABATE�T .
Prbpe: D rernove de�ecII�e perC, Q�miuoeaoilwt+gl�l�cnrna daa� n�in D iaiee� Q aorn�sa O�a .O,�ape
:Ca61W8raw: iopaetiosAxs: Q roa�t aoen Q . .
deay Q aeriat r Oc+nanda�'' -.
'.Remove Ve� Y N �? Y N Moi�Ta�get Y N Olher_
El�a an a�hst�.O none D eroY�e
' NoflRraBax El oMaY Q� p gwetia�g a�sa.�r Dar:
' . t�� � �T �'i Gt" .✓°�� �/� �Yb f Sif l QN �� � ^�Ct`a:J . -
� �.,�1 C�f✓� ���
�;, ;
- - - -
HAZ HA4.��'S��[3R�G7�3i�E�,��N'�S .
T� Q�E __ -- _-- - _---
Tree Num�er. � �; �S!-� - � - — - --
ir
���DBhk�Ttudc�._._�_��D�a Lnib Sp��
Crown Cfass:Dominar�: Co-Domtnar� Induded:
Speciak Specimen• hl� �.T� ���� C� _
_
Heefth Rating:�Strudune Rating�Root.Strucxuie RatinB=_(2096-40�6 HBZtree--SO°Yo-70°Jo
nequir�es profes�onal care) _ . _
. ��y:P�a Cm�e: Crown Redt�ced:_Flu�C� T� .
comocunar�g tarm.s -- - .
CRGWNi�EFEC'7�:b�dkam p�+aerioa af irdividual deEecas�d t�s iteelr saneriif►(s-��af4 fiton►) .
: DF.F�CT CAdIMN 'ERtA�K S[:AFE4IDS BRAtVC}�E.S
Foo[•tapet . _
_ _
;Bow swaep
C.adaa�l�
MuldPfe a� .
_:Icr�uded ba�k
;:E�[r�nd�dweigirt
:�
. �
G6dQ�fg .
waundslsaam .
� .,
�
8see�rglsap flow
, .. : •
Laos�aaclaed trnfc
;; •
_, ..:: 'Westi[IQ holdfbea hhe
. -' Deadwoodlatr�s
`-Bo�er'.Jt�/�ts
:` .Canf�sl�allsfb�rls
..t.8rartousfa�ue
NAZARD RATING -i.e„n��=��,ryom� Q� a� o� saa .
h� Y -N Lean dl�eetice:.�
Tree Part most�oely 6o fa� Fai�ne Po�t-toati 2�mC�x 4-severe
�P�_an�! bi�+uat atlrcr S�eafpat 7-�(15auk 2-8-78'(t5-45rn�� :,.
�� . Faiae Pok�l+Siae a6Da�t�Taget f�al'sg=Fla�d ii��g 3—i8.9Q'(45-75 cm�4->30'�75 cm�'..
QII�/ • + . Fm9et+afng�—acramm!uaa 2—tnferml�nt usa '
3—f�tu� 4—eorneanttfse:.. ."". :
,._ ...,.. .
HAZAFtD ABATE�T ,� ::;
Prtn� D rer.wve�e perY Q�¢ad�eigl4 O aares d�� O Qis [3 ri�a caeopy B aawnad� Q� .O�
CabfWBtae� 6apRlfisAxr_ Q rmt ao�re Q �
decaY Qae�af.��mo�^
-'Remove Oe� Y N Replaee9 Y N Kvw Target Y M OYbr_ -
_ _ .
-.Elfixt on a�aemtt�erx•D m� D erakta�e
'No�aeom Q o�mer ��ag� p go�ong apa.�r Dal�
, CaMMEi�TS � l?� .f � Gl(4 -r S' ' r lS3�J �-�' . ,�I'Yv''� � .
�.� �. �� J Z
�' , :�.
HA� #�L�S A�(�RlCZ�.?!�E'Ct3NSi�—•lliT� _ .
- �- � --- _ _. � __ -- --- .. ___..
Tree rkirnber, � �S� � ��� .- �
�f� � - _ _ _
�� ' D�t,,,�_Ttud�__�He��D�l.mb Spd: z�
Crown C�ass: Domina►rt: Co-Dominar� �ncluded:
Speciak Specamen: h�stori� Street Tr�ee: Indiger�ot� � .
_______
Health Rating�Sducxure Radirx��Root.Struc�ure Rating:,_(2095-40% Haztree--50%-74%
requires profesionat car8) _ . _ _
. �m9�ry:Pro Czit� Cram Redtp;ed;_,F�us�C�_T�
_,,co�,a�,s� . .- � . --_
cRGwHUEFECT�:a�Caee pmseesee of�aefe��a rd�a oeetr�nr(�avme n��law) . . �
DEF�C7 ROGT CROqtN �RtA�K SCAFC�LaS BRANCHES
Poortapa . ., _ ;
Baw.�aep
C.odaa�m�mb
MuWPie aGadltnents
. �
kauded 6ark - .
` Eu�oss[�eerdr�M
_�
' ' Fmn9as
Grt�ng .
Wow�Jse�n
Oea/
Carily
Cant�tpoo�� . _
��
I.aaselaa�e�b�k •
.. :.: -Nestinp ho0d16ea hiue _..;:
. Dea6woodls0�s
'HaretsJ ferna�eslants
�; GantcetslQalLsfiu�ts
.. 'Rre+riwslaihse -
.. .. ..
..__ , .
HA2ARD RATING .t� _ — �-�„n� �o� p u.ou.a� o se�oonee�a soa�: Y -N Lean di�ec!lon:
Tree part qwst�ae1y eo 6t Fal�as yole�faE t-fawC 2-�ee�m�3a�igtt 4 seveie ;
�n��_�.+� aa...� oa�r s�or� �-���s��2-s-��.es-as�,k ,
H� Fa�aePolenf0l+SfineaLPat�Tagetf{afig=i�la�tdf�6g 3-78.�1'�-75cm�4->9U"(75an1�..'
�//�/ • + a T�t+� 7—a�0�d+ssA'2—t�u�entUSe:
3—ieR�t+�4—�nl�se'...._'
._,,
HAZAFtD ABATE�fT � , ..
�, ��: o����c; a,��,.�ra n�.,��.. om�. n��, n�.,.� a� a.�
ca�+msra�a: r�etfi� Q�ooc a�e Q
` Rernwe tr� Y N Rep�ara? Y N Mow 7a�get Y N p�. �y Q a�hai•Q mon�c•;• `
� - .
'i .Etlect on a�atrerx-Q�ane D ar�uals • -
aio�eaBax Q ow�xr Q�oger D gove�ing agen�r pa�a;
� � ' �s ��� �s �Z
�; . _ __
HAZ . .. 1iA1�'7'F�ID'S Ag"�CR�C1�.7't�E t�" `N�$ -
—' ,t'i�E __ __ __.. . ...
__._.
Tr�e Na„ntier._ ��;/A�._ _ g�--� .- "
�GL-�S� �� Tcu� . _ . G- - .
�.� _����,.�� �/f?-��
Crown Cfass:Dominant: Co-Daminan� �Induded:
Spec�al:Specimen: Fi�stwi�_Str+eet TrBe:,_I�genous: � .
Health Ratin9:�Structure Rating �� Raat.Structure Rati -- o
[+Bqui(�9.5 p1�Gfesioltal p18) _ . �'—����o HezUee--50/0-70%
. ��y:Pr�C� Cr�awn R�:_Flush C�_T� �
co��� _ .- _ . _ _
crrcw�rt�cr��v����xs�,a�a�rrs�►yt���.� . _
_ �� rbovr c�re� �en�nc scar-�or.os eFUUVCt�s
Paorfapa _ _ .
Bav,svueep _
Codomi�latkyb
MultlPle�
4rchded baAc
;'Goess�re erd w�ght
;��
� �
Grt�hg �
Waunds/sean
�
Carih
_ �f0lsaP 8oir •
`;: 4:aasefaadeed 6ark . _ _
: `-N�inQ ho�6ee hive
,.;: -.' Oeadrwodl�
' ��Jixr��/a�
.. .<, ;GankasfgalLsl�,eLs
. a'Rreriaus'talhsa '
._.. - �
..,._ ...._ _
HA2ARD RATING :teiu�_ _ _ e�,r.,�� n,� a� �� so� .
� v -H fsan di�ecnon:
Tree P�most�cely 6u falt Fadtne Po�6at T-bas 2-me�a�C��C 4seveta
�^�°�O•t—� �s.� aner size or�e �-��ts ank a-��a-(�-4s cmk , ;;
�� F0Htt1�S PbOd�l;S�me d�VaR+Tigat Rai�g a�p�� 3-18.�4'(4575 cmk 4->30'(7S cmj..:.
�•"7 + . _ � � Ta9etrafl4 1—oxa�o�i u�2—ial�ant use� ,.
HAZARDABATH�NT . 3-�mQ a-�ntvse
Preir�e: D�a:wne defec�e part, D redux adweigft �aaw�dean �tbo Q�$� p aowi oediee O�6+ebsa ��mpe
Ca6klBr.xae. tee�et'(u�fier: Q�oat ao�re Q deey O aedal�D,manyor
,
` ' Rernove trea Y N Re�n? Y N Mow Taget Y N q�- _ `,'., `
E}�Ci on adJao�t�ees.p� p� • " .
NoHrta6a� 0 oMeer p m�gmr II gpve�ig e�sa,y padr
COAl1AllEiYT$ �Q � _ �
�� _
H�4Z #lA1 "'TE�'S�(3RlC��.�iAZE� N'�5 .
- - �T� .—� _ _. Gi�,�E, . __ -- --- - - __.._
Tree Nurr�er. ( . � " � � .- . - --
�s�1¢._���T[udc�.�_tie� �d � 17�5 Lmb Sp�d: '�
Crown Class:Domina,�: Co-Dominarrt:�Included:
Speciak Specimen: Histori�_Street Tr�ee:_��geiwus:_ .
Health Ratirl9:�Sbucture Rating:�Root.Str�ciure Ratin9:._.(2pg6-'�0°!o HBZtree--50%70%
�eqWr�es profesionel care) _ . _
. . �H�ory:l�ro Ca� E�+owr�Reduced;_,Ru�q�_To�e�
. compo��g ta�r� -. --- _ -
,CitGWNDE�EL7�:4dka�a prcs�af�ndaid�mi def�s�d tate itmfr s�aity(��pd�ai���m�r)
,:
�� RO�TC�OWN IRtA�1K SCAFC�t.DS BRANC}iES
Poartap�r �
BaN:� _
_.,Codo�
MWtlP�e a�adunatfls
kr�ded bark .
'` E�e end weigfrt -
'.; :�
. �
Gjrdpn8 .
WotQlds/sa�rt
. .
Dec+y
�
•
�Eow
>lao�uavoed bark
: ;Nestinp fwkll6ee Fdve
'. .Deadwoodisk�s
' 'Batersltmmales/a�ts
•:CankerslgaQslE�uts
..t'Rrerir�afalhae
HAZARD RATING iFJtl�- _ - � _��g,�iow.e�a,a� D.ar�aa� II�a.�aad �se�anec�d swl
h�v� Y -N Lean dkecNo�
Tree P�most�oely 6o Fat Fa�tee P�+�t-tor 2�C�C 4seueie
�P�__aerttd biaaual aY� Siaedpat 1-�(15aak 2-8-78 (15-45cn� -
H� FaHtaaPold�l+Siae aE�Part+Tagat Raing=ya�d f�fng 3-1&.30'{�'r75 cmk 4->30"(75 tm{:..
�Il�/ a �. � T �_� _ ,,:
m9etral�g uSC2—�rmi�Ytts�. ,.,
3—ix�tuuC 4—�ntuse -
. :
���� .
Preir�e: D��e�trt; II�uo�adweigft D oawa elrar ��io Q r�io��aooq�r Q csawi�a Q�ne�ie O�mpe _
CaWaBraca: impaetiesA�r: Q�oa�taorw� Qdecay Qaeifal�Q.mon�o�^:. :
:
' Retnave trea Y N Repmca4 Y N Mow Ta�get Y !I p�
ERectozlad�t[t+es-p+�sne �era4� - - -
` Nat�a6o� Q oweer B�nag� p g�g a�s� �
;.
C�11fIMEi�+fTS :•. ..
_ _S�lh� c.� ?� . , _
�,,
HAZ . 1'IW �'�E�At3�'S A�I3R�C�'��A�E Ct�ISii' 11i'3'� �
�� GZ�E -- —_. .
. � - _ ._
Tree Number. Sp�;�'S �a�t:
- - t-► - -
� ������Ttudc� 1 He� Qia lmb Sprd_�-T --
Crown C1ass:pominanf: Co-Dominar� Included:
SPeciak Speatnen: h�stor�`Stneat Tree:______I�g�� � .
—
Healfh Rating:�Struc�ure Ratir��Roo#.SVucture RatinO:._.(2096-40°�Hariree--50°�.-7Q9'o
re4uires profesionel care) . _ .
. . �m9�ry:Pro Czne: E�+own Redu�_�p�_T� �
_, campc��dh�g ia,�„z .- _ . ---
CRGYYA/t�ECI�fn�:aeeP�seofindroidusl��dtafe0eelrssre�r(�se+rmem�oda�af��iorr) - _ .
D�CT itflOT C�t TfttA�K SCAFEQLDS BRANCNES
- :,,
Paottaper
BoM,sxee�
.:�
N�iPfe at�hma�ts .
4�6�At
�; 'E�ess�e dt�we�tR
-�
',�
G'�tt9 ' • �
woundslsa�n -
-
�f'
�
��P� -
1 Lac6�laadaed barfc .
. _Nest(ct0 fwidlhee tuve �
;, DeadwvodlsW4s
�Bar�slfernp�fa�is
,.'':�
.;'Rrevio�ata&ae
, _ .._. `. _
HA2ARD RATING -tEAI�_ d�g.�om.�� �p� rt�s�ahral a� sou
6�ving: Y i�l Lesn��'-.�.
T����„�� efgr�E /�s 7z ��,.�.:����
�+�_� aa.■a oa�r s�a�r v-�-��soak 2-��a-�ts-4s�,k
H� F�Pdeff�I+Siae o6a'al+Ta�.t fiaLtg s F#a�d i�6�g 3-18.�ff(45-75 artX 4->30"I75 anl..';;
�nl�/ ' _ � ' s�.� �-��sas-�,�,eu� �
3-���-�ntvse .,
,.=.: .
�WZ��D i�BAT�i�T .
�PrurYe: D ra:wre�e perL �s��x md weigfd D aoMa dea� O mo O r�:oe ra�opy O aow�u�dira O� O shape
Ca41Q18t^aa� i�etfislfa: Q�mt uo�n Q
d�ray t1 ae�fal Q.mo�^ `
Rernavetre� Y N Rep4u.s? Y N Ma�Ta�get Y N p�
- Etf�ctona�lrses-D�uc Ddalaa�e . -
. , : 'Nwm�as� n� o,na� n sow,+:g,Q.,� o�
� . COMME.i►(�S �G M E �.S /_� _
�,
HAZ ���t�C1�Ti�E Ct�SiA-. �IiT; .
- .- 7T� _� _ _. Gi� _— -- --.. . - _.----
Tree Number. � Spec�; _ �Ur�-�_ p- `--... � � � _ - --
� - Y I - rx+aewni±al.
�:�o�t �Tn� I +� ��u��,sp��.�_ �
Crnwn Class: Dominarrf:`Co-Dominarrt: ✓Included:
Speciak Specimen• Histo���eet Tr�ae: � � .
,_ nfigenous:�
Health Ratin9:�.Shvdure Rating.�Root.Structure Ratinp:_(2a96-40°lo Haztree--50%-70%
requires Profesional care) _ .
_ _
... . . ��r.Pro�a�: t�awn R�_Flus�t C�_T�
_ . �
� _, com�w�arne� -.- ' -
,cRC�DYlIfI3�£CT�In�caee p�se,ece�afa�aerecls a�a r�e a�etr s�eritr(��t� . �
��t%T ROOrf CR�NrN �'fskAiiK SCAFFBLD.S BItANC}3ES
Paanta�er _
8ar►;svuqep _
. �
. MulUPle�
Inchded baAt .
`Exeessire a�d wei�t
-�
Flan9es
Ged�np .
Waw�dsls�n
De�r
Ca�it�r
• _
�+p�a�9o�r
Lcaelcra�loed bYfc
' 'rNesYn7 floldlbee hive _ <
� .Deadwiovd/sh�s
" `8ot�,Jimnp6es/a�s
,: r��
- ..';;Breviotafa6�e
.. ..... - ' _ ..
HA2ARD RATING iF� -_ = — �g,.�.e� a� a� o�eceea soi , ' ,
h�r� Y i�l Lea�.ai�on:
Tree p�art r�st laely�6t Fa�ae Domdffit t-faaS 2�e�ea[3dtglC 4severe
i�pae+to�+p�fO�_aio�.4t b�,al aner siaearpa.c �-<st�sanX 2-��a-�s�ascm�
H� FaituePote�l;Siae a[Pat*Taget l�g=f�ad Ra�Q��g 3—7&.'iQ'[�r75 eaiX 4->30"{75 un1;_.>
�� + . t Tai9Cr.�� 1—oxa�o�l��2—t�ami�tus�
3—i�entu�4—cwaiaMusa
HAZ/4EiD ABATE�fT
' �: n�,���> n�Gm,.� o�a�. nmb a��, n�� n� n�.
cawas�e: u�t� Q�� n a�,, q ae�=Q'�� :' ,
�
Remove� Y N Rep�Ca1 Y N Mo�Targe� Y N �
E�Cc on�tr�s..�,or� D�e . -
, NoHflaBom. Q oMex Q�t�r II 9�9�'1 �
COA�ITS ��1 hi� .S - Z _ " .
��
NAZ� ._ 1'!A1 '�'7E�S�RlCS�_'�C� � .
- - i� __ {� __ -- -_. ----
T��r__ spea� �.srf� - � .- . - :-
� DGL'Z�� /�'�' �Tn�_��Dla Lraf►SpnL-��?
Crnwn C�ass:Dominanf:_Co-Dominan��Inc�uded:
Spec�ak Spepmen" i-�orla_Street Ttee: ���� � .
- __.__._
Health Ratin9:�Strudure Rating:�Root.Sbucture Railr�8:.�(2d95-�40°�Haztree--50%-7�%
r+equires profesiatal care) . .
. . . ��b�y:Pra Ca� C�+o�wn Redut�d:_F�q�_T�
� comnota,dfr,g tauo� ,- _ _ - - . .
CRfiH/NDEF'£C7�:p�pe���ual Qefec��d rame fielr sar�ily(��cve�m�fiia�rj
- ���T RO�T CR�MIN 'FiZUNK SCAF'EOL.EI.S BRANC}�ES
� ?ooctapa _
Bau.s�ep • ' . -..,
. :�
"' MitdtlP�e at�hments
4�ed bmk .
;`E�ve a�dwpgf�t
_ -�
. . FJangas
� .
Wow�ds/s�n
De�tY ' _ -
Cariry
��
;LcoS�fQadred batc �
: _���
- : Deadr�ood/� , '.
' _Batm�.Jfermdes/a�s
Gankers►gal�JbwLs
..';'Pteviots fai�sie -
NA2ARD'RATING :iF,u��.- - _ ._ �.r�ran�a� �a� a�..ma� a� sos � . .
� Y i�t Lean dlieetlon:
T�e P�rtmst�oely Eo Fa� �Gi� �� �G._ Falae P�t-bar,2�S 3-tagf�45evere
lfAZ �ano�—� n�..� oa�r sr�d�e o-<s�ts�k 2-��s-�.�-ds a„k .
FaB�ae Pblaf6al+Sfine a4�at.Ta�gat R�n9=FF�d ii�6+g _
� 3—'18.30"'WS-75anx4 >30'(75qe)'.�..
C3n + __ + _
T�� 7—a�voedta�2—�tueeC.' .
3-6e�rmG 4—eaes�ftase .
HAZAlS?ABAT� " _
Preu� 17�we�Se p�.> p�e mdrreigit �ao�r�dean II�in D racs a�a�p� D c�awi�ee Q� p,sfiape
Ca6laBtaoa: ie�eetiur��a: [3�oaR auN� Q de�ay'O ae�(af'D manilor ':
' �Remwetre� Y N: -�T Y N MowTaeget Y N p�
,._� _
E!lectonadJ�ni�•p� Dera4�e .
, Nw�ca6nmc Q oMrer Q�pg� p 9��J�7 palx
- cc'�r'u�s ��I�•.e � �� _
�
- _ - .-. : _ _
H14Z #!Ai a""�'S A�t�'�'�Ai�� �� --
—" � __ _.
Tii� �_ -_ _...__.:
Tr�e I�rn�er. � � � - . ' �,��5- �Gt� ± y` ' - _ _ :- - --_
. _ -- ��- -_ _ ,� �, /,, ���� �h_ -- - .
DC�:�l�k � 7 �T (� � ��r t�a ln�►5ptd:s��
Crown Cfass:Dominant: CaDominarrt: "�Included:
Specaah Specotnen• Histori� �nest�Tr+ee: ��pg��_ .
Heafth Rating:S�U Structure Ratirtg�Roat.Structure Rating:_,(289�b-40�1a Haztree--50��.-74°Jo
r+equires profesional care) . .
_ . ���r�►:4?ro Cat�: E�vwrt Redttced:_Flus�C�_Z�; .
.
.. , _
,.Comgo�ndt�sgi�rx : -.-. •�:�_.
-
GRGWNfl�C7�:h►�cate pes�tce of�debec��d r�e�ir savailY(�-s�vm�a�to�3�to�) :
- D�CT R[!a'i"t�lt 'iRt1l�IK SCAFE�LDS BRANC�IES
., .
° Paartapet :_ ,.
_
Baar,svu�aep -
.:C�
, .. .
_`A�u{tlpie at�� . . �
4�ed tm�k . , ;,,�I
/'t
�;°E�ssive end we9gfrt
:
:� �
' �
G6dOrtg.' .
wa,ndslsewn � _
�Y
�
,
Can��brar�cet
_ ��
laocelcrad�ed bark �.
L�_
- ;-NestinghokQ6eetdve ,;:.,
° ,Dea�odfsa�s S
' 'Bat�.Jt�nuTasfants
,6ankerslga(Isfbuds
;.Prevfa,sfai�e �
` �HAZARD R4TING — �� /���n
�� _--�_d�eg.Frasf ea�d�a1 II+asahaal O�d Sad�ing: Y Lean dl�ect(cn:
Tree�rt rrmst�cety to b� ��)O f �C^O r...1� Fa�ne p�t-�r,2�3�ogt�4-severe
�P�_�m�! bian��rat aqier S�edpa�t 7-�(75ank 2-5-78'{f5=45cm� -
� FadutePofe�l;Si�o68af.tTagetl7�ng=Ft�df�g 3-18.?O'145-75cmk4->3p'(/5cm).:;,.
Q/I•J/ �,— +—��.+—�_ ,/�-- Ta�etraU� �-arm9matus�2-augmtt�us�
3-�quentusC 4-�tinCvse ., "
; .,:; :
HA�l�ABAT�T
i t'nt�e: D aemwe�p�c. n�Oe ena,Kdgitl 0 ooaw clra. n t[�, a,aise eaoopx n�w,� a� .�,�ape::
.Ca61a1Hraoe: 6apeettu�a: Qtoatarn�n Q . ;.
a..
;;'Rernove� Y:.N Re�ee1 Y N �loNeTaeget Y N �e�- � ���'�:�` .
-.. -
` E�ecimi�fre+es•[}no�e II� - -
'`.>tiottRca@an: Q oqmK II� t7�g ege�r pa�e: �
cc�s e� ,� _C-��J{ �- -1, �;���
�7� U`eti-2 ��� .J, ,ri"� U�t r� / i � i.^l .�!� �J
r.''`
�"� i� :S �
, .:. ;.
qj' ,�VS
HAZ � .. HAL'�"'�E�S Ai�Ci2L7i�tE Ct�.""VT; .
-- �li� � -- —_. --
Tree Numtaer._ � �,S{� - � - — _ --
� ��D8lt�_T�u�.�_He���D�a Lmb Sp+r� 30 F�'
Crown C�ass:Dommartt: CaDominar� �ndudeQ:
Spec�aak Spedmen: F1t�ori�_Street Ttee: ��g�� c� .
He81th RatiDg:�S'lTUdure Rati11��Root.Struc�ure Rattng:_(209�-40%HeZtree--50%74%
requir�es profesional care) _ . _
. . �m9�►:Pro Ca� t�awn Redt�ced:_,F't�(�_T�
� �s�� --- - �
cRCw�vfla�cr�r�ee o�of�ae�s�a ra�e nxrr ss.e�►c���.� . _ �
_ D�� ROa'�GTiOMI�I 'fRIA�iK SCAFF4L.OS BRAHC1iES
Poarta�ec _ .
Bae:sweep
_ Codom�lfodcs
�P�e�w�afts .
4rided hark .
;`6�e p�d wdght
Cra�sfs�ts �
' �
' G-adlyog .
Wa�
�Y f'
CaritY -
,•: _
��P� -
L,00wlaadaed bak
: .-NesifnQ holdlbee hi�e
, . : .' .Oead�roodf�s
,9aaF.Jierm�eslaa�
` ',C�
.t?reviaafa�ae
,,
_
HAZARD RATING tEa��_�q,Feom.er�id �D�otra�i Ei+anaara! O sdE�eaeaa sas .
heaving; Y �f�t Le�i dl�ecLon: W
Tree Part irtost ioeiy�0 6�__�i���r��r�iJ.�/� Fadtas Paee�t-6oar,2�n�nC 3-l0�4-sevet� �
k�ecf�nn«fo�_anmat 6Fa,m,at olAer siaeorpast 1-�(7sank z-s-ia-(15�45ank
� _�;�t� f�sad
�� � ��8 3-78-.3Q"(4rr75emk 4-a 30'(!5 cm) ':,:
�n T + _ ♦ °T`� Tatgetla�g 9—a�votmtnsC2—�fenn@fmY�
S—f��w��—eor�nluse ..
HAZ.ARD ABA7'E1YtEi�iT " .'; � : :
, '�P�me: D�tfw�de�er�e part=:L7�md�eiglt Ef awn dear Q rtio Q rsa� O oow�ad�� fl�a :�shape
_��IBrave: _ I�peetiercfhe�: Q�oat an�n Q � `.
' ,. . tlecaY aaeyfaf,Q:�„t;' ;
Rentove pe� Y Pi �sT Y N Ma�Ta�get Y N OQ�ar_
ElAett cw�t�ees.I]none fl ermh�e � .
' NouHca6ax Q owrter Q� p guvenonq ags�cp paf�
` CGMMEi11TS � - /?/�.I1C.. , J � �iCTC' �.��,d .
" . /������ s
��� ..
HAZ v .. tLe1L�'�'��It3o'S�1T�flRlC7�?t�E CaNS1�I,"�II�� .
— T� t7�E __ -- --- _ -
Ttse I+Munber .� gp�; _ � - — - -
�,� -- - : _
� DG�'�-�--D�.,.�_Tnudc�=He�_��Dja tai►Sprd:�
Crovm Class:Dominanf: Co-Domi�en� ✓Included:
SPeciak SPe�n�: I��Stori�_Stneet Tree:_Inc�genou� '� .
Health Rating:�Spvdure - .
Rating�,Root.Str�cxuie Ratin9:.__{209b-40% HezVee--50%74%
requires profesional car8) _ .
. �mB�Y Pro Car� t�vwn�_Fiush C�_T� .
r.om�o��+�so� . .-. � - _
cROwn►oa-,�c7�i,dlraeev���ndq.iaw+ae4ecsaoaraeauf�sare�hr(��od�t� .
_ , D�CT ROQt'L�ODYYN SCAFFQLDS BRANC}lES
, . _.: PCO[`t8ptf _ .. .., . . . �, . , .
- :..BOW.S1A4lp � - _ . . .-
-CndOmha�(ks
MuldP�e a�ls
4dudc+d hstk .
. ;'�E�iremdwdi��t
�
, : Flan9as
G'� -
w«.�slsean _
De�ay
Cavity _
_ �P�
toowlaacl�ed b�rk .
; .., :.: '-1�(rIp holdlhea tilve .
- Oeadwoodfswbs
`' `8ater5dfetrmldaWs
�; -��
. ':Rrerinia f�iae
HAZaRD RATINC3 -i� __ l D �,�o,o.o� �o� a� o� soa� v-r� uan a�uon:y�
r���a�ye�r� T'✓ .J � r�e a�t�z-,�.��a-�
�n��_� m.+� an�r � � �J s�o�y�c �-��ts�k a-s��{.ts-os cnk ,-
N� Fai�aePale�l;Siae aiPat�Taget :��� � / 3-18.30'[�S-TS emX 4->30'(75 Cm�..''.
�/i� �_ +_`�� t�: T��1-��2-ta�mment� •
'�t�
3-�u�1-mrata�+Cbso.....` ,
H14ZAFm ABA�i'E�11' .
Prur� a farwve�Ye pac": a+�Ce ma,�eigM O aan.eean [l mti. a r�i.rasipp a ao�n� n� a�
_Ca6W18race: keep.etfisihe: Q mat ao�n El
- Removetrea Y N d�aY IIaerfai,•p�mon�Or^�,'
,
; Rep�e? Y N Ifaw1`aeget Y N O�: •'' , '_
: r�on a��.�mue O e�eh�e � -
NotMea9vrr. Q a�� Q� Q 9�9� ��
, co��rs � ��,�- '�'�, u (�N�����J� — � � v , .
. �r� v s � , v �►��r �� ,� - � � � �, G����
`� �J���(l��u o-���1 ,
HAZ " tlA1..�E�'S d��.�i�E��°� .
— � � __ -- --. __--�-
Tr�e Nu�er. � � ��,� � � - :- - :-
�:`��.,Z_T�.�L_��o�a�sp+��
Crnwn Class: Dominarrt: Co-Dominen� ✓Included:
Speaak Specimen: Hi�wi�_St�eet Tt+ee:,,,_,_Indiger�oux� .
HeBftli Rating:�Sb'udure Ra�il��Raot.Sbv�ture Ratin9:_(2096-40°�Heziree--50°/r70%
requires profesional care) _ . _. __
. . �9�y:Pro Cane: Gam�:_F7us�(;�_T� .
� _,.ca��rax„� -�- � -
crr�wrvoe�cr�:a,�aee v�at�a�,a�dere�ssWa r�e n,err�y(�e�ode.�i� . �
D�ECT ROQP t�N TRUNK 9CAFFQLOS BRANCliES
.,
�POOrtaper
eow,�vueep
..,�
,MultlPle alt�N�ta1ls
,:In��led bmlt -
, 'E�¢essfveenQwdgitt
�
�
— � . .
Wolrlds/saan -
O�a!
Carih
�en�p�Eo�r
lao�efaa�d batfc
,_.. :.: ;NesitnQ fwkil6ee hive �
_ DmdwoodFl4�s
' _B�sJf��fs
' G�
-. -Brev[wsf�
_. .. , ,._._ ._,.
HAZARD RAi1NG —��� _ ..-. .
de4-From vmBd O r�-.i LI r+so0ral O sei�maeceed Soi h�: Y i�l l.ean dkscllo�
Trsa part aoost 8oety�� ��� /'T.J /� faiu�Pomef6aE t-baK�3-togit 4se�re�e '
�P�_aio�w�at 6t�+ua1 alhar Szs af pat 1-�(t5 cmk 2-&4�{15-45 cnk -:
HAZ Faa�e.a�,�;s�cr.�a.�+Ta�c�=Ftama aa�+s 3-78.3fi{d5-75 ank 4->30'('�5 a�) ".
QQ� � t�- � �... + a . _ .� �.: •,'..��' �.
.. . S�f�i,�7��119C'1-�O'l�I1CIiC�-�- .
� � . � . . � 3-�IId�WC 4-�f(t759 �
HAZA�D ABAT�T
P�e: n�we�e p�t: 0�ad,.eigfa D a�a e�n a mt. a a..e�op�, n a�n n�e a�a :a�mpe
C���' 6esp�etiesArer. Q�oat anan Q �
Re�nove tr�ea Y: N � a�.a�.
'��.�:- Repfam? Y N Mo�Ta�gst Y N p�r:
E.lkxtonad�t�-p� p� " .
' _ Nat�ca9ac Q a�oer Q� p goveraing apa.�r oalx
• '.,,�:�S �� S � " .
c�• .
HAZ V � HAL��'E�S Ai�[�C�A.7��iE�t3N5i�,—'IItTS � .
— 7R� GZ1�E __ -- --. _ .
. � � � _ _
Trse Nwnber. � �' � � . _
��_� 7`� Ttudc'� ( He���p�a Lmb Sp�d: .�4� .
Crown Class: Dominar�: Co-Dominant: In�uded;
S�iak Spe�ti�• �_Sh�eet Tree' Indigenou� �
-_ -
Heaith Rating�Strudure Rating ��- Q Root.Struc�ure RattnB:.�(209b-40%Haztree--50�.-70%
requires profesional care) _ . _
��9�:Pio Car� E�+orrn R,edt�_��_T�
���� .-: � - .
CR�ifrA/t7�ECT� k�dkaee p�oe ofi�ivirkml ee6arss aua rate a�ei-saraih►(�sene����iow) .
_ D�ECT ROQP CRO�IIN TRUNK SCAFFOLUS HRANCi�lES
Foaotapa _ _
_
Ban.sxeep
C�d�l�
Muldple a�adtmenls ,
kduded batic
- ; 6aeessirsen�rorei�t
-:,..:
Cr�
' ,FWn9ers
G'p�ing .
W�
,. :,;:;.. :.. _
�!
,
Ca�rilY
��P�
;.l:accelcacxed Uark
: ;,Nes1InQ holdlbee t�ve
�:: _
,�adr�aodls4�s
8a�rsJimrmd�/aNs
! Gankerslgafisl6uiis
'....',:ErerFaaf+fiae
;HAZARD'RATING .t;E,U� _ _ _ �eg.•r+onr ver�d ��rot�a-dl p�..on.y p�aeeeed soa�g: v -ae Lean ai�ioce:
� _,. --_.. , -.: ..
rRe aart�t akety eu talt � r-a�me vaae�,t t-be�2�ee�m�3+:yt�e-se�ere• :
�ve+�—.a..� �..� aner s�e a�.e �-���s aak 2-s-ae-f.t�as cn,k
N� FaB�aePbkn�l+Siae a6Pa!t Tagat Raing�Ffs�d i�6�g 3_�g,,�
(aS75 aak a->30-(75 cm� .':
Only t _ ' ' _�� �-«��z-�� �
i 3-f�qu�tu�4-eor�sanCuse
HAZ�3D ABAT�'T
r� D�ore�e pai. 0�edu�eid,�e�gfa n oowa ae�. a�i. a ps.r�eop� a aoiwnadooe n� .a sf�e
Ca61of8raw: �e�eetfir� Q roat aarri Q .
Remove Ve� Y N �aY Qaer(af•Q monpor^:'
. Repdmm? Y N Ma�l�get Y !�t p�- . �
: E�ect on a��•D no� D e�d�e • -
, ' N�am: Q a�wer Q m�ager p go�g agencr pale�
� � � l�� ,�I'S �� - _
� . .
fiAL�"�E�1L3i'S�C3RlC�Tt�+E t�-�_�11'i$ -
H�AZ T� � __ -- — -- -
Tree t+kunt3er. Species; �,J�f1�7�r� � � - - -_
�_.l�_�.�rnn� / r� �`u�a�.mE,spr��_ �
Crown Class:Dominanf: Ca-Dominar��nduded:
Speciak Specimen: F�Storia Sfreet Tre� Inc�genou� � .
He81th Ratilig:�Strudul'e FZaGnq: /9�Root.Strutxuie Ratj • o
r+equiras profesionat care) "�"' . �•—(�096-40°/a Haztree--50/a70°10
. . �mB�:Pra Car� Cs+own R�_Fius�C�_To�
� comoo�s�h�g t�o,r� -.-: . - -
CRGH/Ni�EF�, GT3� In�ea�e P�af i+dfvidual Qe6�s and r�e Oar1r sare��1Y(��od�alc�to� . . �
D�ECi �i(!OT c�H TRIINK SCAF�LDS BRANCtIES
- .,; PGartarpet ,.
Baw.� _
. Caeamk�
h�ddple attaCuna�es
kv�ded bmk .
:`E�ao�veendweght
.Cradcslsp6Ls
� .
G"�. _ .
Wo�ndsls�m
�Y
�
,
Con
B�d'ngC�p 8ow
"laoselaacl�ed ba�(c
: ;;NestinC holoV[�ee t�e -
" :Deadwoodl�S
_ Buerslfmmdesl�s
.r ^�
:.:..'t'.PIlY�]tl5�{�sC � � � � �
. ' ..... ..._._ .�'.. . .. . -.:...
HA�ARD RA'f'1NG tEn� . - — aeg,rYOw,es�ar �o�1 a us�d p� soA�vi.,� r -r� uan al��
Tree�t most 9kely�o Fa�-��/`"� D!S z� FaVae po�at t-bK 2�3�ic�4-severe �;
�+�..._a..� u�.a,� a�s s�ear�ar v-<s-��sank z-s-:s-�s�ts,�k
N� FaBwePotd�ai+Sime a6F�at.Taget Raicg�Ftr�d Ra6ry 3-7&.3Q"(AS-75 ank 4->30'(75 an�. ..
o.,�y _ ,_:.
� + = Taget ra6sF�-a�o�esa z-i�nutent us� •
3-ieq�t a.��-aor�tt use... �
. , ,;_ _ ,.:
HAZARD ABATE�ENT - ..<,
Pnu�e: D a�iwe dde�.e pwc= n�aoe eaa,.dgfa n oaR+des. o uis n ase.a�W, D ao�..�ed�ce a�umsa a�e
Ca61v18raoe: i�peeti�a�: Q�oat an�n Q �
Remove tre� Y N ReQlace? Y N Mow Taeget Y W �: �' Q aerta(�Q.manficr`-
ElJeCtana�us�s:--Dnone De� - .
, tiotlfka6a� p ow�eer II�naga p gora�ang agw�r p�lr; .
. �,� �f�� s � _
���
HAZ " � HA!�'?E�'S A��'Ii�3E Ci�A''N� .
— t��E ,._ -- -_. _ ._._.
- -- 7Ti� - — _ -- ` .
. � . . j � - ._ ._
Tres Number. �; � - . _
r
� �.�o8tt_�Tns� f He� tTia tm6 Spnd: �iU� .
Cr�awn Class:Dominant: Co-Dominant: IndudeQ:
Speciak Specimen• Histwic Street Tr�e:,I�genou�� -
Health Rating:�Sbudure Ra�ing �t7 Root.Structure Rating:�(2096-40°/a Haztree--50%-70°/n
r�equires Profesionat care) _ . . _.
. �m9�y:Pro Cate: C�nwn R+�:_p�C� To�pe� .
carn�oca�ngtaso,s �-- -- -
cRGwMt.'�ECT�tn�dcase a�a afi�iduei ae�ctsmd r�e asetrsawidy{�savm�a�ode+r�t�oe►) . _
DFF�CT ROOT C1iC�IN �RtA�1K SCAFFOLQS BRANCt1ES
.: _
Poortapet , _
Barr.:,yweep
. ('Ad�a4�sliui�s
MuldPie at�adunatis
kehded be�k .
;:Eu�vn end vreigfK
_��
' FWn9�s
� •
Wour�s/se�n
�!
c,a,rih
��
Looselaad�ed barfc
. ..NestG�p 6oldlbee hiue -
-. ::. ._ _
Deadwoodlsp�bs
_...
; 'Baers�term�eslaets
' •GanketslgaUslb�ris
' . ' .,. RcevfaalaR� `
` �HA'ZARD RAnNG :iF,� _ _. _ a�s.rYaa�.� �a� n�ao.� �� soa a� v -� , �an d�o�
Ttee paR most�eiy Eo� � F�ae Oa�en�t-bus 2�3�IigtK 4severe ::
i�pec+io�+a�►1o�..._�.rat ubs.�al ouKr sme ar pac �-�s�ts at�k 2-s-ia-f.t5�4s a„k :-
N� FaOtee Pole�l;Sime dPaR+Ta�et Raing=F�m�A i�tBng 3—78.'i�[�-75 ank 4->30"I75 cm�.'::.
�/��/ + . � = f�t�ets�a� �—c�us�2-��
3—i�MmG 4—wraf�ftuse: .,.'.° ..
_. .: .,.,.. .
H1IZARD ABATE3�iT ,;;; .
Preme: D�ore d�er�e paR, n�ma,�eigia �oara ae�. n ao a,aos caea�py i7 oow.o� n� a�e
C�B�' �Pe��: Q ma�t aonse El
decay CS aeriat r O mof�oc-• .
' Remwe ve� Y N 3Zep�ce? Y N Ma�Taget Y N plhar_
C-ltectona��.Omne Deraar�s - -
. ..• :.. ,
' _ NotificaHo� 0o�ier Q '
� D9�9�1 �
+. C01YfME.�1�TS �Q � �� '
�',.
HAZ� �c'TE�S A�][3l�C7����iE C�i�-r.N� -
TRE'r � ,_ -- --- - --- -�
- �- -- �.iL�! ) `_.r . — - ._
Tree Nur�6er. �q�; � ti - � - • - _
�'��,..�._._Tn�,_, 1 � c Dia Ln�Spnt:� �
Crown Cfass:Dominanf: Co-Dominarrt: `�Inc�uded:
S�eqak Spedmen: Flistori�_Stneet Tr�ee:,��genot�x� -
He81th Rating�Q„Struc�ure Ratirlg:�Root.StruCtune Ratjng:_(209�-40°Jo HBZtree--50%-70%
r�eqaires profesionat care) _ . . _
_ . . ��y:Pro Cate: t�vrm Red�d;_Flu��_T�pe� �
co�„�,�,a� ,- _ _---
cJiGiv�vv�c7�:k,�e�a�ee of�+�.id�,a�Q�anQ rae a�ir�rurc��k�.y .
: DFF�CT f�00T CRONIIH Tftl1NK SCAFFOLDS BRANC}�E5
': Poartaper
Bah,sweep
- C.bdorN�lfor(n
MWBPie� ,
4ryded tm�c
. 'Euass&ea�dwei�t
' '.�
' �`�
, Gps�ng .
Wa�nds►saam
- --
�
�
•
��
;laowlaacloed barft -
. �Neslinp hoWlbee triue �
� > -�: DaadwoodlsWbs
'Baters/termdesl�ts
` '�
_ -Ereviws faiue
....
, .
�NAZARD RATING .tF�a� _ � ,— �g.�om.errd �0 e� B� p�reaed soa
�e�eir� y -!1 lran d ce
TRe Patt most�[eiy to fat a f��-e ✓/S ,/l� �IAC�YdOYr�'�4�I�C 45CVEf�G
��_�.� ms.� ou�er s�ot�.r �-��ts an�c 2-�aa-�t�as�mk
N� FaB�aePOldfSal+Siy9 o6Pal+Tagat Raieg a�d��g 3—l&.3fi{�5-75 CRJx 4->30"(75 Cm�.7�.,'
�111'y ♦ � ' T�9�� �—oo�so�d�2—�nnitle�Y►�seC' '
_ 3—�u�tu�4—ao�taMusa
Ml4T_ARD ABATEi�t�f'1'
, Pr�: n�e+:,we aelecsae pai"n�ma,.ay�a �aa.naes. n,l�i. Q.asa�a,aq, a�.�a.ed�e a�,cm� o�pe
CaWaBtaw: � .
��A�r: Q mat aar� II deray Q aeiEaf,Q rhanHpF..' `
_,'Rentwe tre� Y N R�Ce4 Y N Mt�Taqpt Y ti �
,,: �. E�Ct ari agaa�tlneer-0 nor�e O ev�1e • -
.. N�ar. Q ow�rx a menager p g�g�71 p�
; :co�rrs JQ�. S '7� � � " -
�'
HAZ ✓ HA1 �'iE�S Tt�i E Cl�Si� �N� .
� Ci�'�E. _._ -- ---
Tree Nwr�er. �; - � .- :- _ --
�'�_ �'--—-- 'f I�
�t.�TnrNc�.`.Fle� ?�D�a LmbSpRl: 2{ �
Crown Caass:Dominant: Co-Dominar�V Included:__
Speaak Specimen: Histwic__�r+eet�Tr+ee:_____��genou� ✓ -
He81th Ratin9:�StiuCture Rating:�Root.StruCture Ratin9:.__(209�6-40%HBZU'ee--50°/a-70%
r�equires profesionai care) - . _
_ . �m9 H�ary:Pro Cate: E�wn Reducsd;_Fl��_T� .
���� . .= _ _ -
cRC�vn►os�crs:r�����,�,a�n�sa.�.c���od�rG� .
�cr �roor ca�urer �a�nc scaFwu�s eruuucs�s
Paartaoaer
Baw,swaep -
� �-
M�dBPie al�dunm�s , .
;: :4Lided 6edc r^
J
` `E�oae�r�e d�d weig4t
:.C�
�
Gas1M9 .
Wataidslsean
Oes� ,;. _ -
��Y
_ �P� •
4,006edaac�6arfc '
-_:. ..: ;NlesSnp holdl6ee fdve � , .... . ._
- � Deadwoodls0�s
' �Baer'.J(err�es/�is
r Canlcerslyapsl6uiis
:•. �Rreviaa f� _
. . .
`NazaRn RanN� -�.: _ :. ._ �.�� �o� B� o� s� � �
� ,r -u �a��:
r�ee aart,nost IBreiy 6u 4� �4(',� TrJ��JS r.>.J c� (� ? Fai�e a�t-bas 2-mad�.rc 3-��4-severe ,
�+va+o�_a..nd hiasr�el ahef siae af pa.e o-<s-(1s aok 2-s-78-{t5-as cmk , .-,
M� F�ne PoOenfd+Site aiPat+Tagat R�itg s Haatd -
3-1&.3Q(�r75catX4-�30'(75Cmy :.:
�II�/ �_ .�_+�a Tacgd+� 1—ae�o�t us�2—aM�o��se�
3—��4—awa�+luse:....." .
����
, Pttrne: D��e part: �r�a ead�I�l O aa�des� �Siw Q r�'as cautpY II aawnedica O�ae �.stmpe -
Ca61ai8nc� ' '
6upettiu�rer. Q mat aoan Q dsay pae�faf�Q:motl�pr•< -
_ Rarrtave trea Y N` Rep�x? Y N Mow Ta�get Y i�I p�
Elfect an adJ�tttees.p�ne p e�aY�e . -
.raun�aao� ao.�er a� a�,:s,�,�r a.�
' . COMMEi1ITS �L .L�«.0 � � ��a� .. - .
A�^ •7/�� � er,4 ,,�_
� �.( � ,�.t/ � ...__.
�
HAZ v 1�IA!�'7��i�''S A�]ORlC�#,.7i�tE!� 'NTS �
-- - -- T!� t��E ,._ -- -__ _.._
Tree Number.=_ ' : --- � - - � j . - _ --
_ _` � �
. �-�.,._���Tnnfc�=Hei�__`�A j��D�a!n�Spn1: � _ -
��
Crown Class:Dominanf: CaDominar� Included:
Speciak Speamen- Histori�_�e�.Tt+ee:_I�;g� � -
Heafth Rating:�Shvdure R�aWt�v�/}'� Root.Sbvcxure Rati
r�equires profesional care) T . �9=_(2096-4�°� Haztree--50�-70%
. . ��y:Pro Cet� C.rown Reduc�d;_Fiush C�`T�
���s� . .- _ _ � -
'cxc�rror�ca�rn�eo�of�+�ana��►�urc�se�a�od�►�o.�y . .
. ��� �'� TRtA�IK S�AFFOLDS BRANCNES
, :,: _
Feortaper ,.
Baw�eep -
Cudom�a�
AAuilipfe at�adunesks
4rhded 6mic .
Eu�ire d�dwa��
�
. 'FWngvs �
� . .
Wau�ds/saazn
�l
t',a,iih
_ �pf�p 5orr .
;Loose/�radced bnk .
, : .
. ::Nesftop fwidlhee hiue
_;... .
.
. ,Omdwoadls�s -
' ,BamrJtermdes/�ts
iC�
Previo��
_HAZARD RATiNG tFnl� — _ " deg Fioar vr1�1 -��1 II umamsd o�F�re� saa • .
� Y-N Lean dkecUon:
Trea Peit most�ety Eo Ea�_��f 6�+� -�y c b�� Fa�ae pia�E t-foar,2�a+�3�u�4se�!ere
�P�'__a�erat bia�wriat Cqmt .�itee of pat 1-�(15 ank 2-fr78'(3'' b cA1k
�� . FaiWle PaW�I s Sfine d�Pat+Tage�(tai�g a�p��g 3-18.�
m
QR�jI + � � {.�r.75cmx4->30"(75em) '.;
_ Ta9et+� 1—aa�ia[��2—�.use� '
3—�qu�t u�4—�usa
HAZARD A6ATE�
�: D�e acAem.e p�c''a�xa,a�agfa n oarr+de�. a mb a�ers�op, u ao.,a� n� n�
Ca61a16�aca: kupactfis�v: Q mat ao�n fl daay Q ae�taf.r��,•`,'. -
_Rernove tr� Y: N itepd�e�� Y N Mow Ta�get Y N pg�
E�eaona�a��•O,rn� Der�e � �
NoUtica9ox 0 ow�mr p� Q 9�+�9� �
_c�w�rs q,�..� �S �'Z_ . ^
�
HAZ 1�A1.`""lE�It�'S A�t3�C��7i�iE i�-. .11� .
- - 7� --- __. a� __ -- --- __._
Tree Nwnber. Sp�; �IS� � � .- — - :-
,; - ' �, - /� � ' _ - — -
nc�:�."lZo� , Tn� �Z r������ .
Crown Cfass:Dominanf: Ca-Dominat�fi IncJuded:
Speciak Specinten• Histori� Str+eet Ttee:,_I�genous: '/ .
—
Health Rating:�Strudu�e Ratirtg:�,Roo#.Struature Rattng:__{2095-40%HBZtree--50%-74%
requires profesional care) - . . _
. . �m9�:1�a Care: t�+nrm Reduced:_Fiustt(�_T�
co��� -.- _ .. - .
cx�wror.�crs: a,�e w�ot�a�ess��a a�se,�+n►t�se�me.m�� .
DS�CT ROQP CROMN TRUNK SGAFEOLDS HRANC}!ES
Paartapa
Baw,syueep -
C�
MultiPle�tts _ .
_ k�hded 6mic . �
E�ssire md rreigirt
�
Fian9ers
_ G'odOn9 .
wourwfslseam .
•
Oecar _. -
CaritY
.. ��
Laose/aacbed l�ark .
: ;NesifnQ hoMl6ea tdve
.. .
::
Deadw�oodls�s
- Baer'.,If�mfies(aWs
., .��s
- -. B�erfaatai�e �
_ ..._ �, , . _
. HAZARD RI�TING rF„n� - _ �s,�,o.Q� �n� a� o� sd�n�: v -H �a�o�
r�aan�c aoe�y�� �vo�.,�t t-�r,2-.�..a st�a-s� ;'
�►v��_� u�au� oa�r ssor�.e v-���s�mk z-�oa-tt5-4so�k . -;
� FaBwe POienfel►Sime a6Pal*Taget itafig:F�a�d i8a6�g 3-18.30'ZdS75 tatx 4->30'(JS ctnj.`:;
�nfy . + _ ,..�.
F t—masia�at
_ �+� �2—tufe�wi�tu�
s—&�enu�4—con�amusa
HAZARD EtBA'1'E�E�+lT
Preme: D�em�w�s��� � 1e prarrt- � : eadr�aghl�awn dean II Ain p rise eanopy II aawn�ed�e O�fieh�a O sbape
ca6lasraea:�LL�P��, I ��' i1-� f b e p e e tfiaIItr: a r o c c a a�rt a a e r a y E 3 a e�i;a m o r�o t����
Remove tre� Y N Rep�e? Y N Mow Ta�get Y N �
EtJect on adJac�i1�`p� O eralu�e - -
N�a9a� Q anw Q+� II 9�9�� �=
• ��� ,.
� _; ,��.-Q C� .ti.�,a � l� � �
�
HAZ HA1 c"�E�"'1�t�R��-�i�tE�t7NS�1I NTS .
— _ _ 7� .—� ___ a� . -- -- --. -- ..---
T�s Num�er. � Speqes; �.5��/" - --j �_ . - :-
_ �k
�'1 !'� ��"�_ �=T��_He��Dia tmb Sprd: Z� �
Cmwn C�ass: Dominanf: Co-Dominan� Included:
Speciak Specitnen: }�storia �eet Ttee:_,____Icu#igenou�_ .
Health Rating:�Struc�ure R�ating,�,_Root.Sbticture Ratinp:�(2a9b-40°� Haztree--50°�-70%
c�equires profesional care) - . _
�m9�r Pro Cane: C��ann Redut�_Fius�t�_,__T� .
� cam��g�ado.s � -- � - .
CRGWIV t7�CT5:p�ca�e O�sm+�e�i�ml de6ec��d r�e Qeetr�Y(�'e.a�nod��tow) . . �
. D��T - ROQPCiDDWN TRLRIK SCAFFOLDS BRANCNES
., _
, PQacmper
. _ .
Baw,�ne� � _ .
.:Caddmina�bl(arim
MWItlPIe�na1ls , .
4rJ�ded 6a�1t - .
. E�acessireendwdglrt
-CradcSlr,�ts .
�
G'�ne
Wotmds/se�n
OewY
Cariq►
. �glsap Eow
;L,aoae/aadced betk
: .. . NesYa9 hokllhee Mve �
Dea6woodlsn�s
` _Baaer57�/a�As
�
_ �
. -:Pn.wiousfaMue
�HAZARD RATING tFan� deg.r,om.e� �n�oaa-al II+ar+ae,.al o�aec�d soa . .
heaving: y -N Lean d4�ac!lan:
Tree Part most�ely�o h� Fad�ne Pa�E t-baC 2�3�4severe .
�+�_a..,� �.,� w� sz��r� ,-<sc,s�r 2-s-�s-��-as�,�
H� FaB�ue Pota�;Slme a6Pat*Ta�at Raing=Fla�d A��g 3-183ff(45-75 anX 4->3U"(75 an� '.,
�Ilfj/ * + • Tar9etraSs� 7—aorrsa�lus�2—hriaa�ntus� • .
•- , .
3—�ie�t us� 4—ao�ant usa .: .�....'
HAZARD ABAT�iT .
; Preme: D remwe�peR:•n�adnae e,a,�g�l �ooMa aes. a uin o rse.rj,oq�, o asn oe� n as6+rm�a a s�
:Ca6w9rae� �ePaeti�sArcr. Qmdaoam Q � _
rJecaY �'ae�fal'D manpor'.•�'
� `Remave tre� Y N FLep�c�1 Y N Mvw Tae�et Y N p�- _ �
Etfed an adJx�tIIse�`O�nne D eraY� - -
, NotlRaeox Q oMeer B� p gaeAq agw�r py�s
- ��S ��� /�f 2 _ .
��
HAZ V HAL�'���1D�'S�3RlC��Tt�E��r_lII�'.�°,� -
— __ -- --..
- -- � ._.— _ _ � _.----
Trse Number. Spec�; Sf - �. '- — _ -
- t. - , . - - - . _ _
. �--L��� _�-�! . Tn�_��.�_��Dia tmb Sprd:�
Crown Cfass: Dominar�: Co-Dominar� Inc�uded:
Speqak Speramen• H�Stori� �reet Tt�ee:_��gerrou�_ .
Health Rating: �� Strudure Ratin��i oot.Sb�ucture RetlnB�._C��-4� Haztree--50�0-70�/0
r+equires profesional car8) . _ . _
. �m9�:1�ro Care: E�rnrn Reduce�_Flus�C�_To�e� .
� com,pounar�� � �-- � _- -
cR�,i�v1vD�£Cr�:id�e v�+�����a r�e naelr saradr4�=scve��nod�ai�ktar.) . . �
_. �F�C'f R�TCKOwH 'f'fitR�iK SCAFFOLAS BRANC}�E5
,: .Poartape� _ _
Baw,swaep
C�d�
MultlPle�unatls .
4aided be�1c , �
; ,E�aeassive end rrei�rt
.�
F(an9as
Gi� _
wa,nd�s�n
�
Depy
�h -
Canl�/Imat�o�a�bcadoat ,
�8a�r
LaosalaarJaed bar(c ' _
_;-- Nestfnp hotdl6ea hiue
Deadwoodlsa�s
' ,Ba�
r�.,lqal{slburls
. ;Previaa�
liAZARD RATING .��: .- _ _ ��.er�id �eo�a�y F1 unanot O sel�ooae�d soa�aring� v -!�t te�
Tree aare m�c a�ly a,ta�_�A�''� � f C�'Z Fal�es�t-+oar 2�r�+�g!z a-sev�e `
p�pec�o�+veho�_araral uTra.ual otlKr sia or pa.t 7-ss(�s�mk 2-s-ta"(t5-d5 rn,x -
N� Fa6we.P�d+Siae a6Fat*Ta�it�fi�g=Fla�d paG�g 3—.�g,�
(45�75 ank 4->30'{75 cm} :'.'
OnJy . � _
Ya�9el�aBng� 1—aor�o�tess�2—i�NennUlent.usa�,' •-.
3—�u�t�A—e�an[use ..
HA7.�4f�D ABATE�It .
vnme: D ra:�ore dde�Ye perc, Q�eema,�dghl n ao�.n am. �Ui, a r�oe ea,op� rr aow..adms o a� a�S
Ca61alBrdca: 6�peetfis�xr. Q�oataann Q �
a�y o�•n�oc�,
s
- tternovetrea Y: N I�ep�? Y Nf MowTaget Y N O� _
Effeci on a�aees-p iane p eiah�a�e '
" ` Nottflaeox Q oMier B�nager p gore�a�ea,�r Daeoe -
• . C.�� _�Q/i(-� �f �� -
t�
HAZ � HA1.��Do'S 1�0l�Ci�7'tAiE Ct�^'lll�� .
-- Tf�s Ci� _._ — —_. ..
Tree Number, d � �1`S� - - . �---� � - _ . - -_ __.._
_ _ � Bofat�r�
�'�D� - ., ;T��_�,�.�Dia tmb:pt+�f�
Crown Class:Domi�anf: Co-Domina� �ncluded:
Speciak Spec.imetr h�stori� �eet Ttee:_IncGgerwt� ✓/ .
Heelth Ratili9=Q Strudure R2itin� 7� RoOt.StruClurs Rating:__(209fo-40°/a HBZt�ee--50%-74%
�equires profesional care} _ . . _
_ . �m9�y:Pra CBne: Crown R�:_F��t� To�e�
��� � --- � _- -
ctrcm�l D�CT�:rn�caee�ot�I da4erls�a.am o,etr ssrai�rt�evme.��o.rl . .
D�CT RDO'PCROw1� �ttA�K ScAFFQi�S BRAHCt1ES
Paactaper , _ .
Bonr,sweep J
Cado�W�a�slborrks
�Ple� , .
k�hded be�fc . .
, ,,`Eu�eendwpg�t
'.' .,,� _
. �
G6dib�g .
Wow�dsisa�n .
Decay
r�� /J�
. �ngfsap#ow
CaaselGadoed badc ' �
' ';:N�fwldfbee tdve
' ' Oeadwoadlst�s �, ...
°Ho�slfemR�/�ts
' ,�
=Pceriaa€aLue -
_ .. : -: ._ . _
HAZARD RA'�'lNG t�Nl� — d�g.rYOm.ogcal ��e�aa� a w.�aal p s� soil�: v -i�l ss�+'a�re:
r��e�c a�y��t��� /:J �✓'J.,l� �e po�t wo�z���c a-s�e
a�+ve,�_.a�.+� ur�..� oa�r s�or�.r �-��fs�nk 2-s-���t�ank `.
H� Fail[uePdcf6�+Siae a6Dat*Taget =Ma�d 3—78.?a'(45-75 anX d->30"(75 an) :'::
�nljl �_ +_��+�. Taget�as �—aor�vonmus�2—tnlera,umntuc�. �,:
3—fi��a�tn� 4—ao�anlase .
_>:
FWZARD ABATE�'i'
Pretr� D�e:+we�e p�R:'n�uoe ena,�agltt Ef awa dm. n�i. a�oe caKqy O�ow.� a mbn�a a,�e .
,Ca6iW9raca: b�tie��ror. fI�oot aam Q - ,
•; .. drr.ay LZ aerfat r p mon9pr.`
.. . �
�,.
RernoveVer Y N Rep�n4 Y N Mo��Taeget Y N O� „ _ .. .
ERect an adJae�ut�-O m� II eraluale �
: :; '. No�ork Q o� Q mamgar p gws,og,gm,�, na0c �..:_
. �:�$ �(� , / ,� � r � � �
"�tl �� � i���.�Crl�`> 1 S_
.: .
�
. - _ _
H�AZ . ��"�t�Af�t3R�C�_?�� �� .
71� t�, -- -_. _
T�e Nurr�6er. � . Spec�; /y�S/-�. _ � .- — - -
' ii ' ' :
�'��--Z—Tau�.___L_�_��D -�i�a L��nd:� -
Crown C1ass;Dominanf:,_CaDominarrt: �ded:
Speciah Specimen• 1-listorf� Street Ttee:______��get�ous:_ -
Health Ratin9:�Stn�dure Rating:�Root.Structure Ratin9:_,.(20°�-40°lo HazVee--50°�.-70%
requires profesionat care) . . _ _
. . ���:Pra�ane: E�Own R�:_F�q�_To�ed. �
. . ., . . _ . _
,.comnotmdf�vg#a�s: - _-. - _
CR�WIiI i7�FEC7�ked�p����and rate�eir sa�rilY(�at�node�ra��tow) . .
,.. �. •
DEFECT Rll6{'t�H �RtA�tK . SCAF'FC3LD.S BRAIVC7iE5
:
Poont�et .
- _ ,
_ ::Baw,sw�p - ,:..
.:�ka
MuINPie a�g
,
k�ded 6atlt �
.
. 'E�ve a�dwa�t
-:,..:... _ _
,.. .... ,:� .
�:' � .��
G� , .
Woundslsaam
DeaY
�� -
Caa
�saP 8wr
LaoselQac:ted barfc '.
: :Nesi(ne twddlF�ee hive � ;: ....:_ -
:> Deadwoodl�
' ,Bate►sltmrml�(arns
,Cank�s�G,slbwis
Eceriaa ta�a+e
- •
HAZARD'RATING E���— �s.,�naer� �[t� p� p� so� . '
hesving: Y -N iean dkecfion:�
T����,���:��.� �� `Trv,sl� �/�;�z��Cr�w..� ���2��4�
�ne+�—�rera! ro�.�,at oqxr -��b� L�.J smeorpa�t 1-ts(lscnk z-S-7a-{t5-4Srmk
�z Faif�ue.Poten�l;S3�o68aA+Ta�}et ={�a¢ad f�Gsg 3-18.30''(drr75 cwk 4->30'(75 Cm) .,.'
�/1�]/ _,,,�— ♦�+� T�� 1-aa�t+se 2-t�ermit�t us�. �.
3-fi�K�4-�nCifSe. .`
. •:::. ::':
HAZ�RQ/tBATE�i'}" . ,�:,' . ,.
''PrtuYe: D rer:tave defec�e part 'fl�ioe ad we9gl�t D ao�deart II tLo D raise coop�r II uow��ee Q�nc�ut8 .p simpe: ,
Ca6tal6racs: bepect{�: Qmadaown IIderay t]a�iat 0�'mnMar :>•
;' 'Remove tree. Y N �e? Y N Itore Ta� Y i�i �- - .,�
. .:Et�:tona�aeerat�ee�-:O� :p� • . ;. . .
`.`l�totlftraean: Q aorteer Q� D 9��9�� �: .
���$. � � l✓�.� — ` , �_ �
f II L/ C,ll�/C l�C 11�
���
, f ,�ts.�1� ��-� S
HAZ v HAL�7 E�'S�OR![�,�,.TtAiE Ct�� 'N1T� .
- � .—� �� -- -- --.. -- __---
Tree Number. , �; ,�},,J��� - � - :- - --
�`��� !( �I �-��_��bia Lmb Sp�d: > ''
Crown Ctass:Dominant: Co-Dominatt��InGuded:
Speciak Specimen• F�p�`Str+eet Tree:__��g�� .
Heelth Rating:�S�vc�ure Rati►tg�Root.Shucture RSt1ng:�(20°�5-40%HazUee--50°/r74%
requir�es profesional care) _ .
�S�ry:P�a Care: Cfown R�;_F�qd�_T�
cam�o�e�g�cm.� _ _ . _ _ -- . - �
�CRGSYNO�C'f� fn�caee p�ae���e4a�s a�d r�e�r�r�y(�rme.�i�owl .
DFFEC7 _ ROOT C�OY�N TRW�iK SCAFFOiDS BRANC}�ES
Paocfaper _
:Ba�r.�veep , . _
�
MuItlP1e�dun�
4ri�ded bark .
, 6aoassireendwei�t
..:,. ,
_. _Cradcsfsp6ts
. �
G'm�l� ,
Wa�nds/se�n
De¢sy �
�Y
.. _. �:
Ca1
��P�
tcos�laa�ted hark
. ..
N�p hokUbee tdve
. "` ,DeaQwpodlsWbs
._
`' "Baersltemn7es/a�rts
.'Gank�slgaU�l6u�ts
� ;Previaa fal�e
HAZARD RATING :tF',v(� _ - - :_ d�g,.Fram aoreai .o� Li�y o� so� • �
6e�irg: Y �1 Lean dteecflon:
Tme part most�oeiy to fa� �Pi�")� �r �� Fad�se V�taour,Z-�s+C��C 4-seve�e `
�+n�_amiral mnnat o1Aer sae d pa.c 1-�(ts cnk 2-&-7a-{t5-4s an�
N� FaBurePola�6�+Si�e a6Pat+Taa�at R�i'ng a/{��� 3—78.34'{�75 cmx 4->30 Cl5 em)�.;,'
O/��/ + + a Ta�9eira� �—oO�Omt us�2—iNermtlterY� :.
3—ieq��t u�4—�ant i�5e "
��Q A�T�T
Pnme: atr�ovede�edaepart- Q�ioemdxeay�t Oao�rndes� DQo Or�eoee�noqq IIaanaed� O� .a,shape
Ca[HWBrdc� G�qelfi� Q mot ao�n Q drray Q ae�at�p monqon.;.
� Rarnwe tre� Y N �ca? Y N Ila�a 7a�get Y N p�
..s -
C-ffed on a�thee�'O nore Q erah�ale "
, ' 'NotlRea@o� Q o+wxr �a�nager �govan�g ap�r pa�
co�s �"��,� l �'� . -
�
HAZ HAl ""�E�"'A��7�E�A-" _� .
- �- � .-- = -- 'Ci�E __ -- —__ _ -- -----
Trea Numder. � Species; �(�� � �� � . _ :-
. ��� _ `i ��zTn�Ma�._.�_�.�.17�a l.mb Sp�d:„� -
Cmwn Class:Dominanf: Co-Dominat� ✓Included:
Speaak Specamen• H�tor� Sheet Tree:,,,_In�genous: �/ .
Health Rating: 7� Structu�e Ra�ng:�Root.Sbvoture Rating:_(2095-40%Haztree--509'.-70%
require.s profesionat care) _ . _..
. . . �9�l:Pra Care: t�+awn Reduced:_Flush t:�t�_Top� �
: . .. ...
cam�w�ar��m.� . -.- - _
cstGwm t7�ECr�:)ndicare�o!�1��a rdte neeir su�aiy�c�aevme a�ad�i�or.l . . �
_ DF�EECf ROa3'cawwH 'FRU[aK SCAFEOL�S BRANCf�lES
Poactapu -.
Baw,swaep . - . - .
. Cadaa§� ,.._
MuItlPle a�Guna►ts ,
krhded bark .
.;"E�veendrreigfrt
�':�
' ",Hangets
_ G'ndMg
wow�slsea�n _
DeGSy
cariH
�ngfsap flow -
LcoseJcdcloed hertc
: ., :.: 'Nest(ng floWlbee hive
. ` Oaadaoodls�s
f"°Botarsltama�la�as
`; ,CaNce�rJga9sfhuis
..r'Rterfaaf�kse
_. _ .
,
FiA2ARD RATING LEnI� _ : _ �s.Fiaa�.e��ld �O r�irrl tt u�oaal O sdFmnee�ea swt 6e�ein� v i�! Ls�a�eecuon:
c ' ., _. ;: .:
Tree R�mmt tioNy b fat Faiae?�t-Iar,2-n+ed�mC�k 4-severe `
�a�—as.a �s.,,� ou�r s�d� �-<st�s�nk z-s-as-(.�Q„k'. ,:,
�i� FaBwePafer5al;Siae a4Dat+T �ffamid
��9 �+8 3-18.�'(4r75cmk4->3Q'(75an1'-::
Qn� . ._ +� ... t . a . . _�� ��OC�t�'2-RIIGIR�ILS@'��-�'�.
. 3—�rntu9e:�—�lvsd:.....'.._' .
�'1AZA�D�1BAl�i�'
Pretne: D re�wre�e pat- ��uoessdweighl �oo�dean �R+iw Q rass r�op�r D aawa oeiea O� .O sfmpe
CaWW9raca: `ap�etfisA�er: Qmatan�n Fl
dxaY Q ae�6at'D Nron�["::,.
- Rernove trea Y N R�? Y N I/o�Ta�get Y N O� _ -
Eltect on adla�rt t�ees•O� D srah� �
, NodfleaCax Q a�er Ci� L7 9�9�7 �=
�$ �a H7 t� �� -�� .
�J _.
HAZ . !'1A!!'T��1�'�l�t3[i�C'!�?1�E Ct3l��_ .� .
— -- -- -
� t� _._ ..--_
Trse Mumt�er.��.`^ �;_ _ �� .- . - --
��
�`�� !!r� 1�'Tru� Z Hee9tt� 1�� pia l.�b Sprd:_��
Crown Cfass: Dominani�: Co-Dominarrt:�uded:
Spec�ak Specimen• }i�ori�_St�et Ttee:_Indigeiwus: � .
_______.
Heafth Rating:(O� Structure Rating,�Root.Sqvcture Rating:,,,_,(2096-40% Haztree--50%-74%
requires profesionat care) _ .
_ . �m9�l:Pro Care: Crann Reduc$d:_Fh�sh(�_T� �
,���� -.- � - _
c�c�mr�cr�: r����a��a�n�s�urc�.��.� .
�F�CT ROOT CR�l1 TRUNK SCAF�OLD.S BRANC}lE5
,, _
pcpr•tsper
Bo�v,s�ep . � '
� _
Mu1tlP�e aKa�fls , ,
_4ehded bazk . .
� ';`E�ire en�we�rt �
''.��
. �9� f--
GirdWfg .
Wa�mds/se�n -
�
�b
��
L�dred mrh
: ;Ne�np hoidldea hiue
Deadwoodl�
_Baterslf�f�ts
- Gan�ce�.,IgalWhrsts
,.+:Rre++iaalalue
.. . _ � -:. ,_ , _
HA:ZARD RATING -tF�1� deg.Fiom.escal �o�cal a u.a�ral 0� sou�vin� Y -w s,ean al�actloR:
Trea Qmt most 18aely 6o Fa� FaiNe palee�at t�o�,Z-+n�nS 3-li�hC 4seve�
�ve+�_an.m b�a.�l olher sixe o1 pae �-�(ts«aJ�2-�18-(s5�45.dnk,:,:
�� Faiiu�Pofa�l+Siae a6PaI.+Taget i�'i�g:(���g 3-18.?0'(�'r75 emX 4->30"(75 a�} ,'
O� * ` ` T�4��F�-�d us�2-6ramltlent us�
3-f�qt�eritu�aC 4-�pnCusd .
��}A��
Pmle: D�ove dPtec�e part; ��uae md�ds,�l O a�aws desr �t6o D rae eaoopY p aawi s�daa O� ��mpe
Ca6iWBraw: i�ctfis� Q ma!aowt Q �
decay Qaefiat'�.monNOr�i;•
`itemave trea Y N Repf�4 Y N Mow Target Y N �
EtJecson��-a� ueralmse � - _
` Hot�6ac �awRr II c�na� 0 9�9�7 �
� � �s )4n� � �s -��
�� .
HAZ V � '�E�"' TuiE Ct� �llf�� .
_ l�Z .`_ _ _. (,'i�'�E, __ -- -_. . � ----
� • . n�,� _.. � _ _ -
Tlee Nwr�er. Spec�_ l�C�c���US � � . _
�-�=�.....L__Ttv� � - - - - .
������
Crown Class:Dominanf: CaDominant: Included:
Speciak Specimen• Histto�_�tr+eet Tr+ee:_,_I�igenous:_ .
HeaRh Rating:�Q St�+udure Ratirx,��Root.Structure Rating:��(20gb-40% Haztree--50%70%
requires protes�onat care) . .
- . ��►:�Care: t�o�nn R�:_F'wsh t�_T�
. , _ _ � .
. ����� _ -.- : -
"c�cwn�o�cr�:a��ot�+ae�a�a�e a,�r�rc���.� . �
n�cr �rr cazo+rr� -�K � eenr�cx�s
Paartaper
Banl,�
_ Cad�
MWdPfe a�
. � �'
l�ri�ded lsazic .
�,'E�ve end wagirt
�C� . ��
� Fian9�s �
` Gm�lOn9 .
Waunds/sa��
Oec3y -
Cariry
_ ��P� •
Leaselaac�red 6�tc ' �,�,.�
;- . :.: '-NesYnp hokilhee hive �
. ,.
_
' ' Daadwoodlst�s
r _Bater'.�fUarrm7�a�L
,. .�
.. RtevEotafa�ae
- � . .. . . _. /�
HAZ�4RD RATING :LF,q11�" _ � - - �s.rYam easd �b�t�ca+ n un�ral �sel�oorreaed soi . '
t�ing: y i�t Lean dl�ecllcn:
T�oe aart mo��od�r 60[alt l�f�v�' U �%1,,.3�•J r�ise oo�n+sat t�z�3�gtK 4-sevete
�+a�+�_.ais.ei bfannuat ourer siae or pa.e 1-�(1s ank 2-�1a-(ts�as ank . ;;
H� FaBtuePOte�l+SiZea6Pat*TaigetR�ng=1#�dR869 3-�g�3p'
Onf Y —_L _�� �1 t4s75 w,k a->30-ps cn,�, '::
« �—{—' Tagetr+6g 7-aoasiomtus�a-�t�
3-�ue�u� 4-�antuse .".�
HAZARD ABATE�ENT
area�e: n ar,we�e pac= a�uoe vid,�dgis a anra era► o mi, n�.c:np, n ao.n oed� a� .a�
��' 4aspeufisfier. iI mat aan Q . �
daay LI aeria!'0.maniRx'-.;
- Rernove tr'e� Y N: �� Y N rov�T�get Y N p� _
' ,c�on a�acm�caee•O s�e a e�ah�a�e � �
_ Notlfiea9az Q aMner Q mar�gar II 9�4�7 �
` �S �f� r�/` � � � _' 1�(p r � �'"'1�j�. .- �.
—- �� � � dv� c ��n „�� ti J-il-b- - 1. �'a� �
-- �`Z C:N'1�e c�i'-C�r� — 1�77?rz✓'Cl�L (
�f
�
. .
GEOGRAPniL iNGORMaiiOrv Sr51EM
VICINITY MAP
;..
�=
�_
.�.
�- '� �� ; ---__ _
i' � -�.� �� � —_
�....- ;,
� �
�,
�. IT 5 F•ltX
� W1
�µ � '' - - :'y
� ; ''� '�, � .
�`�=;�' .�� ��'� � n
/� :Y./LL'Rff' . Q,�"—�
� _ (J
� ; .. I y��B�+ryR o
//' """B�FP.ENO�� •• �� • S
��,:..-5 � . ..
, J:- ... � I
rio.ra a.a M.P
♦
- �l! '`,l_� N
!__,__.._
— 0 25 50 Fsat
� 1"a 10 leet
� /�
�
City of Tigard
� Inform�tlon on thie map is lor genenl IoeNion onry and
/ �hould be vsrlfi�d w1t�the Dsvslopmsnt Ssrviut Diviaion.
i 13125 SW Hall BHO
Tip�td,OR 87123
I I (5D3)879-4771
Attp•lAyww.d.Upard.or.ua
Community Development j Plot date: Feb 17,2004;C:lrnagiclMAGIC03.APR
' � - � 7 J 1�U /`�17�L �(�,�d�%1.,�.c�L �/07 3/O 7
C/1 � %
�
�
�
D
D
�
' �
�
—�
I
�
�
�
�
V
V�
89TH
�--
�, i
f
� � ��+
`�CEI VEp
PRE-APPLICATION ' �' 1005
J CONFERERICE REQUEST -�r�����
CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 r����"''`
GENERAL INFORMATION
��(�� � JC_,�}CUIK ( �Q,� � FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Applicant: �
Address: 7/!S S.VL/, ���1Y�(Q (,[V�Phone: 5773 �.y(o7�7J CaseNo.: }�R }= ��oS -- ��v�ui,.�
City: �r°�C�L , ���� Zip: �7 a I�1 Receipt No.: -� o�S— b�?`� I
Contact Person: � ' Application Accepted By: C C�-��°
M�6-1 U V� ��Ql�. Phone: S�vY1p
Date: I � �� � J
Property Owner/Deed Holder(s): �61�P` -�� �C��p Y��<<
I ` DATE OF PRE-APP.: �� ��� ��
(�.14Y1�' C�'S ClY_l(�� C�) TIME OF PRE-APP.: � ' c"
Address: Phone: PRE-APP. HELD WITH: J�i/ V�5 1� L
Clty: Z�P� Rev.7/1/05 i:lcurpin\masterslrevisedlPre-AppRequest.doc
Property Address/Location(s):
S,1�V. NC���'t�� D0.�L��"GL. .�1 QU,yY�, REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS
(Note: applications will not be accepted
without the required submittal elements)
Tax Map &Tax Lot#(s): -f'Ol! rvl2►1 f10� L S f 3 S D g '�8��
Zoning: �'(, � Tax le�no�, �-�} [�' Pre-Application Conf. Request Form
Site Size: � 0 QC1r(', 4 COPIES EACH OF THE FOLLOWING:
[v] Brief Description of the Proposal and
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE INFORMATION any site-specific questions/issues that
you would like to have staff research
prior to the meeting.
All of the information identified on this form are required to be
submitted by the applicant and received by the Planning Division a � Site Plan. The site plan must show the
minimum of one (1) week prior to officiallv schedulinq a proposed lots and/or building layouts
pre-application conference date/time to allow staff ample time to drawn to scale. Also, show the location
prepare for the meeting. of the subject property in relation to the
nearest streets; and the locations of
A pre-application conference can usually be scheduled within 1-2 driveways on the subject property and
weeks of the Planning Division's receipt of the request for either across the street.
Tuesday or Thursdav morninqs. Pre-application conferences are [� The Proposed Uses.
one (1) hour lonQ and are typically held between the hours of �- Topographic Information. Include
9:00-11:00 AM. Contour Lines if Possible.
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCES MUST BE SCHEDULED IN ❑ If the Pre-Application Conference is for
PERSON AT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTER FROM a MONOPOLE project, the applicant
8:00-4:OOIMONDAY-FRIDAY. must attach a copy of the letter and
proof in the form of an affidavit of
IF MORE THAN 4 PEOPLE ARE EXPECTED TO ATTEND THE mailing, that the collocation protocol
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IN YOUR GROUP, PLEASE was completed (see Section 18.798.080
INFORM THE CITY IN ADVANCE SO THAT ALTERNATE ROOM of the Tigard Community Development
ARRANGEMENTS CAN BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE THE Code).
GROUP. �Filing Fee $351.00 �
December2005 January 2006
, f 5 M T W T F S S M T W T F S
� 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8 9 10 11 12 73 14
11 12 13 14 15 i6 17 t5 i6 17 t8 19 20 2t
18 19 20 21 22 23 24 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Tuesday, December 20� 2005 Z9 30 31
-Pre-Apps CD Meetings �
' Early
8:00 AM
', 9:00 AM (9:00 AM- 10:00 AM) Pre-App Dan Schenk 503-246-7277 1S135DB-08400 MLP
10:00 AM (10:00 AM - 11:00 AM) No Pre-App Per Kim
11:00 AM (11:00 AM - 12:00 PM) Pre-App
12:00 PM � - --- -- I
1:00 PM
2:00 PM
3:00 PM '
4:00 PM
Late
Tasks
Notes
I
I
I
I
;
i
I
Cheryl Caines 1 12/12/2005-2:29 PM
December 8, 2005
Daniel (Dan)J. Schenk
Proposal:
The purpose of this application is to divide the property into three separate pazcels that
may be used (each) for single family dwellings.
Question:
Will this properiy have access to a sewer line installed at the back of the property by
Alpha Development Company?
- — - - -- — — -- -- — —_ _— ---- �y �
• �
�� GEOGRAPn��CINFORMAT10N S�STEM
_� = VICINITY MAP �
, ,
� I R�FERR
�
�G`nV-" FD h`, --�
t
s i i ,�1.
4" -� 0�;
_-"
� �,.- ,_s, - ���,R
�� i .��
'- J( a
� � �
- .� �... _..yt '
. ` � .
.-. ''\\yU� ��� g'U �_ \
��� � Q�� �BONITq O
� � � , y
_ p
.. 6t�3�_i�• _f.`UILSAM_ D
�� , .
l
.. . .. _ I . .. Tipard Area Map . ,
� �
_._ � � �
_ _ \°► i i N
I �J � I 0 25 50 75 Feel
I� I ,_ .--- - --- �
� I' � 1"=50 leet
l _1 -�----
— J ---I
I
I
---
-- -- I
--
. .-_ . ---�-�
- --- -..__...---� �------ - --�I
-- - -- - — --- -- - — - i CityofTigard
_ �� I
' Inbrmation on this map is for general Ixalion only anA
should be verified with the Development Services Division.
- --- ------------- --
�. �-- --�------- . 13125 SW Mall Blvd
. - .. _ . .-- -�- -�--� -... . . , Tigard,OR 97223
_
_ _ _ _
�I ' ' �'--��- � -- (503)639-4171
� http://wrvw.ci.ligartl.or.us �
Community Development Plot date: Dec 8,2005; C:lmagiclMAGIC03.APR
0' 30' 60' gC'
��A�E , 30� A s�eR oo�c � FA�M s
SOUfH UNE OF WETLANDS AS B K �. PG 3 3 I
DETERMJNED BYALPHA COMMUNI7Y DEVELOPMENT �� DEED DOC. NO. 95-075221
.L. 100
I FENCE CORNER 1S
1.1'EAST OF PROPER7Y L1NE
f PP)
►v oo°a i�aa°E � � N 8�°58�39°E 200.00'(D) ELD) — � � � —
�
Q 5.98'(PP) \ 66.��' �'j 67.99� �.0��
m � �
,�j � �� f� 1 g
� 0�12 E S 72a°� � �
r N �I
N g1°1a'1a"E N?k 12.oa� ' r5�, ,r � S�8°4S�T�E !_
nj 3�•� 27,73' `sS� I �1�•
!`V 17.92' s� �� �� 21.31'
L \ S 49°43'15'E � � �� ��' c� �.�
Q� CAT� N 76°42'�3"E 2.64' N �� �� �yAo�g1 ��. 1s� 2 � '
SOUTH UNE OF �S�N � 3�� 3 26� Ap�1 �
�wEr�vvos ��pHONE � DEED DOC. � NO. 2003-172937 � �
BUFFER ZONE �UNCTlON BOX � S 3 � a
` •- PARCEL 1 c�v � I �T.L. S4OO� �~ o
� TOTAL AREA=12,050.4 SQ. FT. c� PARCEL 3 3 w
� _ (0.2766 ACRES) � PARCEL 2 �
Q. � ' � Z 70TAL AREA= g TOTAL AREA= $ W
10,948.3 SQ. F7' 2 i2,159.6 SQ. FT: Z^
o AFTER SUBTRACTION OF 50 ° g
� hO g WETLANDS BUFFER ZONE: (0.2513 ACRES) (0.2791 ACRES) g �
Z f 0,284.8 SQ. FT. AFTER SUBTR,4CTlON OF 50' AFTF.f'SUBTR,4CT10N OF 50' -i
q°� WETLANDS BUFFER ZONE: WET LANDS BUFFER ZONE: �`
�, � (0.2361 ACRES)
� T TURNAROUND 8,104.6 SQ. FT. 9,552.2 SQ. FT.
Q.�v N EASEMENT (0.186f ACRES) (0.2193ACRES) �
QQ' � � — tJ 89°20'S8"E 90.DO' I cv
--� ��� W
o S�8�r, ZQ23 838„ $ �
r6,
�5
o $ o9„F N 6n �, � ` g
N , gl� �
o � l ��\ c I i � /��2 �� �
R�
Z �� S 89°0.3'48"W 75.00' \�� ���� 89°03' 'W 0. ' /
� \ / � FE�JCE CORNER!S r
' - -- — 1 CONCRETE PAD \` _ � /� I 2.T SOUTH OF � I \ I I
ENCROACHMENT 1 1 � I FENCE CORNER
PROPERTY CORNER IS 3.6'SOUTH
SCALE 1°-30
$ � � X AND.3'EAST
REGISTERED x � � OFPROPiRTY
PROFESSIONA� g � '� 1 $ DEED DOC. NO. coRrv�
� �rvD sur�v�o� DEED DOC. NO. W W g 2003-014642 g �
//�,Gi_ � g 96-100015 s.s� � g � �, � i s, T.L. 8300 g
.Y/—�-�fl�� U�� g T.L. 8300 �2.s� � " '' �d w s.4, _
UREGON 3 � � 3
RICHAR�S LOVE � HDUSE 3 ' cq v) $ �
` $ kOUSE
EXPIRES 12/31!06� `�P 6•7� /�%� z � z � 9J'
�,� �P Z �'I W,4TER I I
Q�,Q- I 1 ! 1 � � � � n.+t� �
\ I /i�.5a� l f 20.00 ».5a � �o.00� � s.oa
� 75.00' /
19.00' � 18.00 [ POWEA ��
TELEPHONE / W$I j S SS°O`�'4S"W J�J.00' ��E WATER
JUNCTION BOX �,I$ ,,,O�R N \ METERS
��c"�v P,xE 12"CULVERT � � '�- 12°CULVERT
12' LVERT
� � + '� � � _
-l/_ — — `
MANHOLE EDGE OF PAVEMENT
�
N
CURVE RAL'IU5 ARC LENGTH CHORD LENGTH CHORD BEARING DELTA ANGLE TANGENT
NOTES C1 35.00' � 55.43' 49.81' S 45'34'08" E 90'44'09" 35.45'
C2 35.00' S4.53' 49.18' N 44'25'S2" E 89'15'S1" 34.55'
1.ALL BEARINGS AND D/ST,4NCE'S ON THEATTACHED
SURVEY MAP ARE CALCULATEO UNLESS SPECIFlCALLY
STATED OTHERWlSE. PROJECT:
PROPOSED PARTI110N OF
� 2.ALL Ti4X LOT NUMBERS AEFER TO THE CURRENT TAX DEED DOCUMENT N0. 2003-172937
ASSESSORS MAP 1 S135D8.
3.PLAT BOOKAND PAGE REFERENCESARE TO LOC.ATION: PART OF LOT 24, ASHBROOK FARM, BEING PART OF THE
wasHrnrGTONCOUNTyPtATRECORDS. D.C. GRAHAM D.L.C. LOCATED IN THE S.E. 1/4 OF SEC.35.T
4.SUR'JE?'REFERENCESARETOWASHlNGTONCOUNTY 1S., R 1W OF THE W.M., WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON.
SURVE`/RECOAGS, MAP NO. 1S 1 35DB
5. WETLANDSBOUNDARYPERALPHACOMMUNIN CLIENT: DATE: NOVEMEBER 21,2005
DEVELOPMENT AS SNOWfV ON PROJECT N0.328-028
DRAWlNGDATEDSEPTEMBER27,2o05. DAN SCHENK SCALE: 1��=�
LEGEND JOB NUMBER: 04-4148
• CENTERLINEOFR04DORSTREET LOVE LAP`D SURVEYS, INC.
� --o— O�D WOOD FENCE 1415 WASHINGTON OREGON CI"i Y, OREGON 97045 (503)656-4915
PRE-APPLICATIOH COHFEREHCE NOTES
➢ EHGINEERING SECTION \ (Ciqi�fTigardi0regontt
S(rapingA BetterCommunity
PUBLIC FACILITIES Tax Map[sl: 1S135UB
Tax�ous�: saoo
Use lylpe: MLP
The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant
will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be
no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned
commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an oppo�tunity to review and comment on
the application. The following comments are a proiection of public improvement related requirements
that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project.
Riqht-of-way dedication:
The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public:
(1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification
right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or
(2.) For the creation of new streets.
Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for:
� SW North Dakota Street to 27 feet from centerline (Neighborhood Route)
❑ SW to feet
❑ SW to feet
❑ SW to feet
Street improvements:
� Half street improvements will be necessary along SW North Dakota Street, to include:
� 16 feet of pavement from centerline
� concrete curb
� storm sewers and other underground utilities
� 5-foot concrete sidewalk with 5 foot planter strip
� street trees sized and spaced per TDC
� street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee.
❑ Other:
CITY OF i16ARD Pre-Applicadon Conference Notes Page 1 of 6
Engineering Oepartment Sectlon
� Full street improvements will be necessary along SW Private street, to include:
� 20 feet of pavement between curbs in a private tract
� concrete curb
� storm sewers and other underground utilities
� 5-foot concrete sidewalk on one side in a private easement
� street trees
� street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee.
❑ Other:
❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include:
❑ feet of pavement
❑ concrete curb
❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities
❑ -foot concrete sidewalk
❑ street trees
❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee.
❑ Other:
❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include:
❑ feet of pavement
❑ concrete curb
❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities
❑ -foot concrete sidewalk
❑ street trees
❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee.
❑ Other:
❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include:
❑ feet of pavement
❑ concrete curb
❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities
❑ -foot concrete sidewalk
❑ street trees
❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee.
Cm10F T16ARD Pre-Applicadon Comerence Notes Page 2 of 6
Engineering Oepanment SecU�n
� ❑ Other:
Aareement for Future Street Improvements:
In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently
practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval
may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to provide a future improvement guarantee.
The City Engineer will determine the form of this guarantee. The following street improvements may
be eligible for such a future improvement guarantee:
(1.) North Dakota Street
�2.)
Overhead Utility Lines:
� Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines
adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a
fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines
are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to
$ 35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines.
There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW North
Dakota Street. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall either place these utilities
underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above.
SanitaN Sewers:
The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) 8 inch line which is located in North Dakota
Street (MH at 92"d approximately 10 feet deep). The proposed development must be connected to a
public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to connect each parcel to the public sewer.
Water Supply:
The Tualatin Valley Water District (Phone:(503) 642-1511 provides public water service in the area of
this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your
proposed development.
Fire Protection:
Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (South Division) [Contact: Eric McMullen, (503) 612-7010]
provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for
information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other
questions related to fire protection.
Storm Sewer Improvements:
All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed
to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm
CIT110F i16ARD Pre-Applicadon Conference Notes Page 3 of 6
EngineeNng�epartment Secdon
' drainage plan for the site, an�� ay be required to prepare a sub-f�n drainage analysis to ensure
that the proposed system will a��ommodate runoff from upstream pi. , �rties when fully developed.
Applicant must show how stormwater runoff from the private streets and roofs will be discharged to an
approved public system.
Storm Water Quality:
The City has agreed to enforce SurFace Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the
Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which requires the construction of
on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus
contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from impervious surfaces. The
resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-
site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not
the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of impervious
surFaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary
sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development
application. It is anticipated that this project will require:
❑ Construction of an on-site water quality facility.
� Payment of the fee in-lieu.
Other Comments:
All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City
maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance
access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily
accessible.
1) Must provide preliminary sight distance certification per 18.705.030.H.1 with the Land use
application for completeness.
2) Must apply for an adjustment to 18.705.030.H.4 for local street spacing standards (private street will
be approximately 65 feet from 92"d Avenue.
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES
In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic
Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected
impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon
the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of
the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee
category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of buildinq permit issuance. In limited
circumstances, payment of the TIF inay be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy
permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible o� when the TIF is greater than
$5,000.00.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Applicatlon CoMerence Notes Page 4 of 6
Englneering Deaartmem Sectlon
' Pay fhe TIF.
PERMITS
Public Facilitv Improvement (PFI Permit:
Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a PFI permit from the Engineering
Department. A PFI permit application is available at the Planning/Engineering counter in City Hall.
For more extensive work such as street widening improvements, main utility line extensions or
subdivision infrastructure, plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for
review and approval.
The Engineering Department fee structure for this permit is considered a cost recovery system. A
deposit is collected with the application, and the City will track its costs throughout the life of the
permit, and will either refund any remaining portion of the deposit, or invoice the Permittee in cases
where City costs exceeds the deposit amount. NOTE: Engineering Staff time will also be tracked for
any final design-related assistance provided to a Permittee or their engineer prior to submittal of a PFI
permit application. This time will be considered part of the administration of the eventual PFI permit.
The Permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security.
Where professional engineered plans are required, the Permittee must execute a Developer/Engineer
Agreement, which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public
improvement construction work. The PFI permit fee structure is as follows:
HOTE: If an PFI Permit is required,ihe applicant must ohtain that
permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Diuision.
Building Division Permits:
The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more
detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at
503-639-4171, e�. 304.
Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial,
industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot
grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading
and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in
cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation
excavation material is not to be hauled from the site.
Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued
after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit.
Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all
work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This
permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially
complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City.
For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a
mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit.
CITY OF TI6ARD Pre-Application Conf�rence Notes Page 5 of 6
Enginee�Ing Uepartment SecUon
♦y . /`
Other Permits. There a�c other special permits, such as m�. ,anical, electrical and plumbing
that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information.
GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS
All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The
engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as
well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in
determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer
will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each
homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall
include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall
also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building.
PREPARED BY: � Z,_�� �_� �
ENGINEERING DE ARTMENT STAFF DATE
Phone: [5031639-4111
Fax: [5031624-0152
document2
Revised: September 2,2003
CITY OF TI&ARD Pre-Applicatlon Co�erence Notes Page 6 of 6
Engineering Department Sectlon
�'-� 5`�a
. 3
3y �Y �� v
. . � ,
�.ITY OF TIGARD
,� - PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES �� ` - �o�°��y��°�«�nt
e P
SFutpingA BetterCommunity
� (Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Six (6) Months) ' . -
PRE-APP.MTG.DATE: I Z. �" �O �C��
STAFF AT PRE-APP.: �f'"1
RESIDENTIAL
+
APPLICANT: AGENT:
Phone: 5o Phone:
PROPERTY LOCATION: /�
ADDRESS/GENERAL LOfATION: S�IU I \Io-`�2J � �� yL,t�— ��,���
TA% MAP(S)/LOT #(S): � "' ��-DO
.
NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: � LrP L,��� p
, �
PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: C��n> � . �D CX,�`J'LaP�, �, ,� 3 �
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN . . •
MAP DESIGNATION: L.
ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: K " �'• �
IONIN6 DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMEMTS [Refer to Code Sectlon 18. S/Q ]
MINIMUM LOT SIZE:�QOsq. ft. Average Min. lot width: ,50 ft. Max. building height: _�� ft.
SetbacKs: Front 2� ft. Side y�ft. Rear��ft. Corner��ft. from street.
MAXIMUM SITE C�VERAGE: �% Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: /%.
GARAGES: Z� ft.
❑ NEIGNBORHOOD MEETING [Refer to the Neigh6orhood Meeting Handoutl
THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, INTERESTED
PARTIES, AND THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION of their proposal. A minimum of two
(2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use
Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to
submittinq vour application or the application will not be acceqted
" NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans
Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Pa e 1 of 9
Residential ApplicatioNPlanning Division Section g
�NARRATIYE [Refer to Code Chapcer 18.390]
The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable
approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to
consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review
the code for applicable criteria.
IMPACT STUDY [Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.0501
As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE
AN IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the
development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the
transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system,
the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type
of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize
the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private
property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real
property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or
provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not
roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development.
ACCESS [Refer to Chapters 18.705 and 18.7651 �
Minimum number of accesses: 1 �.a1L � Minimum access width: �
Minimum pavement width: ��� z o ����r��'�� s��'�
❑ WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7051
Within all ATTACHED HOUSING (except two-family dwellings) and multi-family developments, each
residential dwelling SHALL BE CONNECTED BY WALKWAY TO THE VEHICULAR PARKING
AREA, COMMON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION FACILITIES. �
�RESIDENTIAL DENSITY CALCULATION [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7151-SEE IXAMPLE BELOW.
The NET RESIDENTIAL UNITS ALLOWED on a particular site may be calculated by dividing the net
area of the developable land by the minimum number of square feet required per dwelling unit as
specified by the applicable zoning designation. Net development area is calculated by subtracting
the following land area(s) from the gross site area: 8�y�,X y3�S66 s� �►Ka3
All sensitive lands areas includinq: 3��SY,g 3�
➢ Land within the 100-year floodplain;
➢ Slopes exceeding 25%;
➢ Drainageways; and ...
➢ Wetlands for the R-1; R-2, R-3.5, R-4.5 and R-7 zoning districts. �1E�
Public riqht-of-way dedication:
➢ Single-family allocate 20% of gross acres for public facilities; or ~ ?�3OSF
➢ Multi-family allocate 15% of gross acres for public facilities; or
➢ If available, the actual public facility square footage can be used for deduction. ����
I" � �. ' � r z S �'
EKAMPLE Of RESIDENTIAL DENSITY CALCULATIONS:
EXAMPLE: USING A ONE ACRE SITE IN THE R-12 ZONE(3,050 MINIMUM LOT SIZE)WITH NO DEDUCTION FOR SENSITIVE LANDS
Single-Family Multi-Family
43,560 sq. ft. of gross site area 43,560 sq. ft. of gross site area
8,712 sq. ft. (20%)for public riqht-of-wav 6,534 sq. ft. (15%)for public right-of-way
NET: 34,848 square feet NET: 37,026 square feet
- 3.050(minimum lot area) - 3.050(minimum lot areal
= 11.4 Units Per Acre = 12.1 Units Per Acre
�The Development Code requires that the net site area e�ast for the nextwhole dwelling unit NO ROUNDING UP IS PERMITTED.
*Minimum Proiect Densiry is 80%of the maximum allowed density.TO DETERMINE THIS STANDARD,MULTIPLY TNE MAMIMUM NUMBER OF UNITS BY.8.
CIT1'OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 9
Residential Application/Planning Division Secfion
� �� SPECIAI SETBACKS [Refer to le Sec 'an 18.1301
➢ STREETS: feet from the centerline of
� ➢ FLAG LOT: A TEN (10)-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK applies to all primary structures.
➢ ZERO LOT LINE LOTS: A minimum of a ten (10)-foot separation shall be maintained
between each dwelling unit or garage.
➢ MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL building separation standards apply within multiple-family
residential developments.
ACCESSORY STRUCTURES UP TO 528 SQUARE FEET in size may be permitted on lots less
than 2.5 acres in size. Five (5)-foot minimum setback from side and rear lot lines.
ACCESSORY STRUCTURE UP TO 1,000 SQUARE FEET on parcels of at least 2.5 acres in size.
[See applicaUle zoning districtfor the primary structures'setbacK requirements.l
❑ FLA6 LOT BUILDING HEI6HT PROVISIONS [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7301
MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 1'/2 STORIES or 25 feet, whichever is less in most zones; 2'/2 stories, or 35
feet in R-7, R-12, R-25 or R-40 zones provided that the standards of Section 18.730.010.C.2 are
satisfied.
�BUFFERING AND SCREENIN6 [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7451
In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE
OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the
CITY REQUIRES LANDSCAPED BUFFER AREAS along certain site perimeters. Required buffer
areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of
deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and
horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often
advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may o� be occupied by
vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials
and sizes may be found in the Development Code.
The ESTIMATED REQUIRED BUFFERS applicable to vour proposal area is�
Buffer Level along north boundary. Buffer Level f�' along east boundary.
Buffer Level along�w�krboundary. Buffer Level along ea�e�!'boundary.
sou'►'f� �E sT
IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG:
�LANDSCAPING [Refer to Code Chapiers 18.745,18.765 and 18.7051
STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PU_ BLIC OR
P I_R VATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must
be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of-
way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured
four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the
branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations
affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division.
A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED
in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking
areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view.
❑ RECYCUN6 [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7551
Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE
SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such
as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within
Pride Disposal's Service area. Lenny Hing is the contact person and can be reached at (503)
625-6177.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 9
Residential ApplicatioNPlanning Division Section
� ' PARKING [Refer to Code Cha s 18.765 a 18.7051
ALL PARKING AREAS AND DRIVEWAYS MUST BE PAVED.
� ➢ Single-family............ Requires: One 1 off-street parking space per dwelling unit; and
One �1� space per unit less than 500 square feet.
➢ Multiple-family.........Requires: 1.25 spaces per unit for 1 bedroom;
1.5 spaces per unit for 2 bedrooms; and
1.75 spaces per unit for 3 bedrooms.
Multi-family dwelling units with more than ten (10) required spaces shall provide parking for the use of
guests and shall consist of 15% of the total required parking.
NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED
AS COMPACT SPACES. Parking stalls shall be dimensioned as follows:
➢ Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet. 6 inches X 18 feet, 6 inches.
➢ Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet. 6 inches X 16 feet, 6 inches.
➢ Handicapped parking: All parking areas shall provide appropriately located and dimensioned
disabled person parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to
be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space
symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be
posted.
❑ BICYCLE RACKS [Refer to Code Section 18.7651
BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in
convenient locations.
� SENSITIVE LANDS [Referto Code Chapter18.7751 �
The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR
DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL
DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, 4R ON
UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre-
application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to preciselv
identify sensitive land areas, and their boundaries is the responsibility of the applicant Areas
meetinq the definitions of sensitive fands must be clearlv indicated on qlans submitted with the
development application.
Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands
areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS
❑ STEEP SLOPES [Refer to Code Section 18.715.O70.C1
When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be
submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code
Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall
include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C.
CLEANWATER SERYICES[CWSI BUFFER STANDARDS [Refer to R a 0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3l
LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a
vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive
area.
Desiqn Criteria:
The VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table
identifies the required widths:
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 9
Residential ApplicationlPlanning Division Section
, . , �
� � � 'ABLE 3.1 YEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH
SOURCE: CWS DESI6N AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL/RESOLUTION a ORDER 96-44
�;, - ' SLOPE ADJACENT WIDTH OF VEGETATED
t : SENSITIVE AREA DEFINITION � Z
TO SENSITIVE AREA CORRIDOR PER SIDE
• Streams with intermittent flow draining: <25%
� 10 to <50 acres 15 feet
� >50 to <100 acres 25 feet
• Existing or created wetlands <0.5 acre � 25 feet
♦ Existing or created wetlands >0.5 acre <25% 50 feet
• Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow
• Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres
• Natural lakes and onds
• Streams with intermittent flow draining: >25%
� 10 to <50 acres 30 feet
� >50 to <100 acres 50 feet
• Existing or created wetlands >25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure
• Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow in 25-foot increments from the starting
• Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres point to the top of ravine (break in
♦ Natural lakes and ponds <25�slope), add 35 feet past the top
of ravine3
Starting point for measurement = edge of the defined channel (bankful flow) for streams/rivers, delineated wetland boundary, delineated spring
boundary, and/or average high water for lakes or ponds,whichever offers greatest resource protedion. Intermittent springs, located a minimum of 15
feet within the rivedstream or wetland vegetated corridor,shall not serve as a starting point for measurement.
ZVegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition.
3The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to
15 feet,if a stamped geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine.
Restrictions in the Veqetate Corridor:
NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals,
dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract
from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as provided for in the
USA Design and Construction Standards.
Location of Veqetated Corridor:
IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended
for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a
separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit.
--� CWS Service Provider Letter:
PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service
Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the R&O 96-44 sensitive
area requirements. If there are no sensitive areas, CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS
Service Provider Letter is not required.
❑ S16NS [Referto Code Chapter18.780]
SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of
Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or
height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a
development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for
Director's review.
TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Sectlon 18.790.030.C.1
A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a
certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a
development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development,
or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 9
Residential ApplicatioNPlanning Division 5ection
. t
• � THE TREE PLAN SHAL' 'CLUDE the following:
Ci ➢ Identification of the iocation, size, species, and condition of all existing trees greater than 6-
inch caliper.
�= ➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in
caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D according
to the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code
provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots:
. Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a
mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees;
. Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that
two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.;
. Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper req uires that
50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.;
. � Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no
mitigation;
✓ ➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and
L ➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to
protect trees during and after construction.
TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT
APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be
replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D.
MITI6ATION [Refer to Code Section 18.790.060.E1
REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines:
➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics.
➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably
available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural
resource value.
➢ If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would
not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance
with the following formula:
. The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the
estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the
largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be
viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more
replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property
or, with the consent of the owner, private property.
➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to
allow growth to maturity.
IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the
consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such t�ee
replacement.
�CLEAR VISION AREA [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7951
The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND
EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size
of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any
existing obstructions within the clear vision area. The applicant shall show the clear vision areas on
the site plan, and identify any obstructions in these areas.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 9
Residential Application/Planning Division Sec6on
� �FUTURE STREET PLAN AND EXTF 9N OF STREETS [Refer to Code Section �10.030.F.1
A FUTURE STREET PLAN shall:
➢ Be filed by the applicant in conjunction with an application for a subdivision or partition. The
plan shall show the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the
proposed land division and shall include boundaries of the proposed land division and shall
include other parcels within 200 feet surrounding and adjacent to the proposed land division.
➢ Identify existing or proposed bus routes, pullouts or other transit facilities, bicycle routes and
pedestrian facilities on or within 500 feet of the site.
Where necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall
be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed.
ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18.810.0601
MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process.
Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum
15-foot wide access easement.
� ! � The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 2'/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the
� � parcel is less than 1'h times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district.
❑ BLOCKS [Refer to Code Sectlon 18.810.0901
The perimeter of BLOCKS FORMED BY STREETS SHALL NOT EXCEED 1,800 FEET measured
along the right-of-way center line except where street location is precluded by natural topography,
wetlands or other bodies of water or, pre-existing development.
When block lengths greater than 330 feet are permitted, pedestrian/bikeways shall be provided
through the block.
CODECNAPTERS
_ 18.330(Conditional Use) �H.F)ZO(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) �$,765(pff-Street Parking/Loading Requirements)
_ 18.340(Directors Inte�pretation) 18.630(Washingron Square Regional Center) x�18.775(Sensitive l.ands Review)
_ 18.350(P�anned�e�e�opment) �' 18.705(Access�9ressr�ircu�ation) _ 18.780(signs)
_ �S.36O(Site Devebpment Review) 'I 8.7'I O(Accessory Residential Units) 18.755(Temporary Use Permits)
�`18.370(varianceslAdjustrnents) �18.715(Density Computations) �$.790(Tree Removal)
_ �S.3HO(Zoning MapRe�Amendments) �8.720(Design Compatibility Standards) �$.795(U�sual Clearance Areas)
�18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) ��8.725(Environmental Performance Standards) _ 'I$.79$(Wireless Communication Facilities)
'I H.39O(Deasion Making Pror.eduresllmpact Study) �'I$.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) .�'I$.H'I O(Street&Utility Improvement Standards)
�H.4�O(Lot Line Adjustrnents) 18.740(Historic Over�ay) _
��$.4ZO(Land Partitions) 18.742(Home Occupation Permits)
_ 18.430(Subdivisbns) ��H.745(Landscaping 8 Saeening Shandards)
�18,51 O(Residential Zoning Districts) �8.750(ManuhacturedlMobil Home Regulations)
_ �S.52O(Commercial Zoning Disficts) �$.755(Mixed Solid WastelRecyding Storage)
_ 18.530(Industrial Zoning DisUic�s) 18.760(Nonconiorming Situations)
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 9
Residential ApplicationlPlanning Division Section
� 1 -
" ,
'�
ADniTi0N�1 CDNCERHS 08 CDiNMENT�:
....e.. ' �
O
.— ?
_ �
�4 R
,
f �4 ,�,�
e+2. �/i�1GKo•l•s� �
,�- �s.�. s G�-�.c��
PROCEDOqE�► .
'� Administrative Staff Review.
Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer.
Public hearing before the Planning Commission. -
Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a
recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be
held by the City Council.
�APPLlCAT10N SUBMITiAI PROCESS
All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANN(NG DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the
Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications
submitted bv mail or dropped off at fhe counter without Planninq Division acceptance mav be
returned. The Planninq counter closes at 5:00 PM.
Ma s submitted with an a lication shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8'/z" x 11". One 8'/z" x 11"
map o a proposed proiect shall e submitted or attac ment to the sta report or
administrative decision. Applications with unfolded maps shall not be acceated
The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a Preliminary review of the
application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter
submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted
materials are required.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes • Page 7 of 8
NON-Residen6al Applica6oNPlanning Division Section
� � � The administrative decisi �r public hearing will typically occur roximately 45 to 60 days after an
application is accepted as .�eing complete by the Planning Divisic,��. Applications involving difficult or
protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review.
Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public
hearing. A 10-day public appeal period,follows I d,use decisions. An appeal on this matter
would be heard by the Tigard . A basic flow chart
which illustrates the review proc ss is availa e from e Planning Division upon request.
Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the
applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing.
This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE
INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code
requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff
and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the
site.
SUBDIVISION PLAT NAME RESERYATION [County Surueyors Office: 5p3-648-88841
PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A SUBDIVISION LAND USE APPLICATION with the City of Tigard,
applicants are re�Ulfed to complete and file a subdivision plat naming request with the Washington
County Surveyor s Office in order to obtain approval/reservation for any subdivision name.
Applications will not be accepted as complete until the City receives the faxed confirmation of
approval from the County of the Subdivision Name Reservation.
BUILDIN6 PERMITS
PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR
REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by
the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of
development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the
Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is
recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are
building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed.
Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be
demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that
structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system
development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE
DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED).
e con erence an notes cannot cover a o e requirements an aspects re ate to
site planning that should ap ply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide
mformation required by the Gode shall not cons�itute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements.
It is recommended that a prospectiye applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or
ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application.
AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN
APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A
PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as
unnecessary by the Planning Division).
.� ' � �
PREPARED BY:
CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION - STAFf PERSON HOLDI RE-APP.
PHONE: 503-639-4171 FAl(: 503-684-1297
EMAIL• (�c.a�'s frst name)@ci.tigard.or.us
TITLEI8(CITY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT fODE)INTERNETADDRESS: YWYW.CI.tigard.01'.IIS
H:lpattylmasterslPre-App Notes Residential.doc Updated: 15-Dec-04
(Engineering section:preapp.eng)
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 9 of 9
Residen6al Applica6onlPlanning Division Section
Y ti �Pa co�-��nf�
City of Tigard, Oregon • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, OR 9�223
��
.
.
� ' �
June 4,2007
Marilyn E. Adair
7115 SW Virginia Ave.
Portland, OR 97212
�
Re: Pernut No. VAR2006-00085 �d 1
Dear Ms. Adair:
The Cityof Tigard has canceled the above referenced pernut(s) and enclose a refund for the
f ollowing:
Site Address: 9175 SW North Dakota St.
Project Name: Schenk Partition
Job No.: N/A
Refund: � Check#51681 in the amount of $301.00.
❑ Credit card "return" receipt in the amount of$ .
❑ Trust account "deposit" receipt in the amount of $ .
Notes: Applicant was required to apply for a special adjustment. This was the result of a
staff error and 100% of the deposit is being returned to the applicant.
If y�ou have anyquestions please contact me at 503J18.2430.
Sincerely,
������'��j�.1
Dianna Howse
Permit Specialist
E nc.
I:\Building\Refunds\Admuustrauon\L[rRefund-CancelPemucdoc OV16/07
Phone: 503.639.4171 . Fax: 503.684.7297 . www.tigard-or.gov . TTY Relay: 503.684.2772
- " City of Tigard
-
. , , Tidemark Refund Request
This form is used for refund requests of land use, engineering and building application fees paid by
all methods. Receipts,documentation and the Ra�uest forPernatAczion arRefiax�form (if applicable)
must be attached to this form. Refund requests are due to Tidemark System Administrator by
Friday at 5:00 PM for processing each Monday. Accounts Payable will route refund checks to
Tidemark System Administrator for distribution. Please allow 1-2 weeks for processing.
PAYABLE TO: Marilyn E. Adair DATE: 5/23/07
7115 SW Virguua Ave.
Portland,OR 97212 REQLTESTED BY: Dianna Howse
EAE
TRANSACTION INFORMATION:
Receipt#: 2006-5172 Case#: VAR2006-00085
Date: 10/30/06 Address/Parcel: 9175 SW North Dakota St.
Pay Method: Check Project Name: Schenk Panition
;=f�=ta_%�r_ � ;�,.^ � .r/`.F! , l,'..'
EXI'LANATION: f<. � � �'��c_ , � 1' ,`_ '1�l`>..7':�(.?i/rt7v�' .��Gt c i� '�
:����f"��'�G:/=�'�::s. /"1rY�i.t�:/.:_� /(�Ci'i' -� �%:f1G.0 y�-i7C-�✓ �`�C�=f
REFLIND INFORMA'I'ION:
Fee Description From Receipt Revenue Account No. Refund
Exam le: [BLIILD]Permit Fee Exam le: 245-0000-432000 $Amount
[LANDIJS]S ecial Ad�ust 100-0000-438000 $262.50
[LRPF]LR Plannui Surcha e 100-0000-438050 38.50
TOTAL REFUND: $301.00
APPROVALS:
�
If under$500 Professional Staff
If under$5,000 Division Manager ,�s,�^,�_�;-. —�
If under$22,500 Department Manager .� T 4r
If under$50,000 City Manager
If over$50,000 Local Contract Review Board
FOR TIDEMARK SYSTEM ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY
�,,-`' Case Refund Processed: Date: ���:.'�.� � �:� B . , =- -
I:\Building\Refunds\RefundRequesc.doc 09/15/D6
1V/JV/LVVV • �
C�TY OF TIGARD
-�� 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 9:43:40AM
Tigard,Oregon 97223
. � (503)639-4171
Receipt #: 27200600000000005172
Date: 10/30/2006
Line Items:
Case No Tran Code Description
Revenue Account No Amount Paid
VAR2006-00085 [LRPF]LR Planning Surcharge 100-0000-438050 38.50
VAR2006-00085 [LANDUS] Special Adjust 100-0000-438000 262.50
Line Item Total: $301.00
Payments:
Method Payer
User ID Acct./Check No. Approval No. How Received Amount Paid _
Check MARILYN E ADAIR ST 6706 In Person 301.00
Payment Total: $301.00
Page 1 of 1
cReceipt.rpt
' " Building Division
=
. . ,
Request for Permit Action
TO: CITY OF TIGARD
Permit System Administrator
13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223
Phone: 503.718.2430 Fax: 503.598.1960 www.tigard-or.gov
FROM: ❑ Owner ❑ Applicant ❑ Contractor � City Staff
(chcck onc)
REFUND OR Name: I
INVOICE TO' (Husiness or Indi�-idual) I�i.►'�l�� t � � qC�;r
Mailing Address: 1 L[ � Sl�' v+VZ��vu�- �y�.Z-
City/State/Zip: Puc,c�1��4-u.� �K �.�21 Z
Phone No.: [ Sv 3' ���{�j - "��-���j
PLEASE TAKE ACTION FOR THE ITEM(S) CHECKED (�):
CANCEL PERMIT r,PPLICATION.
REFUND PERMIT FEES (attach receipt,if available).
INVOICE FOR FEES DUE (attach case fee schedule and explain below).
❑ REMOVE CONTRACTOR FROM PERMIT (do not cancel pernut).
Permit #: v/�12 ZUCJ(o— OC U $S
Site rlddress or Parcel #: � �S I 3 S l�� — � g �{ [�(�
Project Name: �C�'��r�-k-- �a�.�� h�
Subdivision Name: Lot #:
EXPLANATION: _ �-���� � ��Q,:c.�,�.,.,� � �p�,,
-�'� a S,T-..�� �d�.� rt,-►,�.�.e d_�-e t-� � c c�F{ p�..�c.r.
i o�:% r-�.��.� � � 3� ( �o�
Signature: Date: S Z( 2-�.��
Print Name:
Refund Policy
1. "Ihc llirector or Building OEficial may authorize the refund of:
a) any fcc which was crroncously paid or collcctcd.
b) not morc than SO°'o of che land use application fee when an application is withdrawn or canceicd before any revicwv effort has been espended.
c) not more than SO°-o of the land use application fee for issued permits.
c) not more than SO°'o of the building plan review fce when an application is canccled bcfore any plan re�-ie�v effort has been espended.
d) not morc than RO°o of thc buildin�;permit fcc for issucd pccmits pnor to any inspcction rcyucsts.
2. Rcfunds���ill bc rcnimc�l tn thc��nt,nnal P�accr in du samc mcthnd in�chich pa}mcnt�c.�s rccci��c�l. Plc:�sc ullrn�� 1-2�cccks fnr E�cnccssing refunds.
� ' � �
Rte to S�s.�dmin: Date Bv Rte t .ldmin: llate ,�. �-i��i B-
Refund Processed: Date .5 �-�.? i',/ B�- �- Invoice Processed: Date ' B
Permit Canceled: Date B� Parcel Ta Added: Date B
Recei t#�+' , . � Date � C p� I�fethod .i,z �+ rlmount$ , �
I:\Building\l�orms\Reyl'ermitAction.d Re OS/24/OG
City of Tigard, Oregon 13rzs swxau Blvd. m T�ga �x 9�z23
�
,�
a -
o;:;�'�;:�::�;,
February 12, 2009 _ 1 . >
:�.
�.� ��y � �, �a�
f:� " ����,�'�. C. ,
i ��� �����` �� s'
Daniel Schenk
7115 SW Virginia Avenue � - � ��J 4 a
Pordand OR 97219
Re: Tree Removal Permit (TRE2009-00001), Schenk Minor Land Partition (MLP2006-00003)
Dear Mr. Schenk:
This letter is in response to your Tree Removal Permit application, dated Februaryll, 2009. Staff
has reviewed the application and narxative and finds that, based on this informarion, Tree Removal
Permit 2009-00001 is approved.
According to the application, one oak tree, 18 inches in diameter, will be removed from the central
area of the subject lot (1S135DB-08400) within sensitive lands designated Sigruficant Habitat
(modexately limit). Therefore, the tree removal standards apply. The subject tree (#85) was earlier
idenrified for protecrion in the applicant's tree removal plan for MLP2006-00003. The validity of
MI.P2006-00003 expired on December 6, 2008. Therefore, the tree protection plan no longer
applies.
Pursuant to Section 18.790.050, tree removal permits are required only for the removal of an�
tree which is located on or in a sensitive land area as defined by Chapter 18.775. The permit
for removal of a tree shall be processed as a Type I procedure, as governed by Section
18.390.030, using the following approval criteria:
1. Removal of the tree must not have a measurable negative irnpact on erosion, soil
stability, flow of surface waters or water quality as evidenced by an erosion control plan
which precludes:
a. Deposits of mud, dirt, sediment or similar material exceeding 1/2 cubic foot in
volume on public or private streets, adjacent property, or into the storm and surface
water system, either by direct deposit, dropping,discharge or as a result of the action
of erosion;
b. Evidence of concentrated flows of water over bare soils; turbid or sediment-laden
flows; or evidence of on-site erosion such as rivulets on bare soil slopes where the
flow of water is not filtered or captured on site using the techniques of Chapter 5 of
the Washington County Unified Sewerage Agency Environmental Protection and
Erosion Control rules.
Accarciing to the applicant's narrative the site is relatively flat (approximately a 6% grade) in the
vicinity of the subject tree. The single tree proposed for removal is appro�mately 60 feet upslope
from the north and west property lines. In this case, staff has determined that an erosion control
plan is not necessary for the minimal ground disturbance represented by the removal of a single tree
on relatively flat land. Removal of the tree would not likely have a measurable negative unpact on
erosion, soil stability, flow of surface waters or water quality. Therefore, the proposal is consistent
with this standard.
Tree Removal Permit (TRE2009-00001) Page 1 of 2
Phone: 503.639.4171 . Fax: 503.684.7297 . www.tigard-or.gov . TTY Relay: 503.684.2772
2. Within strearn or wetland corridors, as defined as 50 feet from the boundary of the stream
or wetland, tree removal must maintain no less than a 75% canopy cover or no less than
the existing canopy cover if the existing canopy cover is less than 75%.
The adjacent wetland and wedand buffer associated with a tributary to Ash Creek is located
approximately 30 feet north of the subject tree and is proposed to be left in a natural state and will
maintain no less than 75% canopy, consistent with this standard.
Based on the above findings, staff concuYS that the approval criteria have been satisfied. The tree
Yemoval shall be limited to the tree identified on t11e Site Plan attached to the ttee removal
application, submitted by the applicant. Any other trees removed from sensitive lands will be in
violation of the tree removal standards.
This letter serves as your permit. This decision is a Type I decision and as such, it is final on the
date it is mailed. A Type I decision may not be appealed locally and is the final decision of the City.
This decision is fmal on February 13, 2009, and will be effective iinmediately.
If you have quesrions regarding this approval,please feel free to contact me at 503-639-4171, x2434.
Sincerely,
`�� �� ` �=z
Ga Pa ehstecher�
n' g
Associate Planner
Copy to: MLP2006-00003 Land Use File
Tree Removal Permit (TRE2009-00001) Page 2 of 2
. . G,�� /o rn�Q���
<�
TREE REM�VAL
:
�� TYPE I APPLICATION
Crty ofTiga�d Permit Center 13125 S[Y/Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223
' � � Phone: 503.639.4171 Fax.•503.598.1960
GENERAL INFORMATION
Property tlddress/Location: 9175 SW North Dakota
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Ta�c Map&Tax Lot#(s): Ma� # 1S1-35DB:Tax Lots 8400
Case No.(s): � E�.7.c.'z�`) - �`�OCi l
othez Case No.(s): �� �'
Site Size:�-.80 acres, abnroxitnatel�34�848 SF Receipt No.: 2'v`�`�'U 3� u
Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: Daniel Schenk Application llccepted B :�- ��
�.J ,-��' i;� 77 Date• 1 '� l0�
�1ddress: 7115 SW Virguua Avenue Phone: �- '�"
City:Portland, OR Zip: 97219
Date Determined To Be Complete:
1lpplicant*:Same as Pro�ert� Owner
rlddress: Phone: Comp Plan/Zone Designation:
City: Zip:
Rev.7/1/07
i:\cvcpin\masrers\]and use applicauons�tree removal pemvt app.doc
*When the owner and the applicant are different people,the applicant must be
the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization
from the owner or an agent of the owner. The ownei(s) must sign this
application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written
authorization with this application. REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS
PROPOSAL SUMMARY ✓ rlpplication Elements Submitted:
The owners of record of the subject property request a Ttee Removal Permit ❑ rlpplication Form
to allow(please be specific,include exact locaTion,etc.): � pwner's Signature/Written�luthorization
❑ Tide Transfer Instrument or Deed
The rl�licant /Prop�Owner is proposing to remove one tree(#85) from
the site locarion.The tree is located in an idenufied SNRr1,as idenrified on the � Site/Plot Plan
C�of Tigard's SNR�I ma� ❑ Site/Plot Plan(reduced 8'/s"x 11")
❑ rlpplicant's Statement(�ddress criteria under
18.790.050(r1)Tigard Development Code)
❑ Filing Fee�186.00
1
�.. __ . �. .. ..... _ �._ . . � �
�-� _ ._ . � _ _
.
.:., . . . _ . ,�.-- .._.
List any VARIANCE,CONDITIONAL USE,SENSITIVE LANDS,OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part
of this application:
No other applications are being submitted with this Tree Removal permits•nor are any other agplications are under review with the Citv of
Tigard at this time.
APPLICANTS:
To consider an application complete,you will need to submit ALL of the�ZUIRED SUBMIT"TAL ELEMENTS as described on
the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements"box.
(Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained,upon request,for all types of Land Use�lpplications.)
THE APPLICANT(S)SHALL CERTIFY THAT:
• The above re�nest does not violate an�deed restrictions that may be attached to or imgosed upon the subject�ropertv
• If the application is granted,the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions
and limitations of the approval.
• 'ill of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and e�ibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the
applicants so acknowledge that any pernut issued,based on this application,may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are
false.
• The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for
approving or denying the application.
SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property.
yL
Dr1TED this �� day of �-r-t�ti'L-t-r=`I ,20�
1
'<-.� � � �
- -l..�
�
Owner's Signaturc Owuer's Signature
O�vner's Signature Owner's Signature
2
January 30, 2009
Tree Removal Permit
9175 SW North Dakota
Map # 1S1-35DB; Tax Lots 8400
City of Tigard, Oregon
Applicant:
Daniel Schenk
7115 SW Virginia Avenue
Portland, OR. 97219
Applicant's Representative:
SR Design LLC
Jeff Caines, AICP
8196 SW Hall Blvd. Suite 232
Beaverton, Oregon 97008
Phone: (503) 469-1213
Fax: (503) 469-8559
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant/Owner: Daniel Schenk
7115 SW Virginia Avenue
Portland, OR. 97219
Applicant's Representative: SR Design, LLC
8196 SW Hall Blvd., Suite 232
Beaverton, Oregon 97008
Phone: (503) 469-1213
Fax: (503)469-1213
Tax Lot: Map 1S1-35DB, Tax Lot 8400
Site Address: 9175 SW North Dakota
Map # 151-35DB; Tax Lots 8400
Location: Located north of SW North Dakota
Street,just east of the intersecdon at
SW 92°d Avenue in Tigard, Oregon.
Current Zoning: R-4.5, Low Density Residential (7,500
square feet minimum lot size)
Comprehensive Plan: Low Density Residential
Project Area: +/-.80 acres, approximately 34,848
square feet
Tree Itemu��al I'crmit City of Tigard 2
SR Design LLC January 30,2009
Summar,y of Pro�osal
Request
The Applicant requests a tree removal permit to remove one tree located in the City
identified Significant Natural Resource (SNRA). Tree #85 has been identified in the
SNRA and will need to be removed in order to develop the subject property in an
orderly manner in at a future date. There is no active development application on the
subject site under review or development.
18.790.050 Permit Applicability
A. Removal permit required. Tree removal permits shall be required only for the removal
of any tree which is located on or in a sensitive land area as defined by Chapter 18.775. The
permit for removal of a tree shall be processed as a Type I procedure, as governed by
SecHon 18.390.030, using the following approval criteria:
1. Removal of the tree must not have a measurable negative impact on erosion, soil
stability, flow of surface waters or water quality as evidenced by an erosion control plan
which precludes:
a. Deposits of mud, dirt, sediment or similar material exceeding 1/2 cubic foot in
volume on public or private streets, adjacent property, or into the storm and surface
water system, either by direct deposit, dropping, discharge or as a result of the
action of erosion;
Comment: The removal of the tree will not cause an erosion concern on the abutting
properties or public streets or infrastructure. The tree is located towards the center of the
subject property on relatively flat ground, as shown on the submitted site plans showing
topography. The soils around the edges of the property will not be affected by the removal
of this one specific tree.
b. Evidence of concentrated flows of water over bare soils; turbid or sediment-laden
flows; or evidence of on-site erosion such as rivulets on bare soil slopes where the
flow of water is not filtered or captured on site using the techniques of Chapter 5 of
the Washington County Unified Sewerage Agency Environmental Protection and
Erosion Control rules.
Comment: As shown on the site plan, the tree is located outside of the stream or wetland
corridor, as defined below. In addition, the submitted site plans, also show that the tree is
located in a relative flat part of the subject site well away from the periphery of the
property boundary. Since the tree location is not located in a sloped area, there is no
evidence that concentrated flows of water will wash over the located of the proposed tree
removal location. Therefore, is can be stated that the removal of the tree will not cause the
Tree Removal Pecnut City of Tigard 3
SK Design LLC January 30,2009
,
�..�...,__..__ _
site to be subject to and water capturing or quality techniques of Chapter 5 of the CWS
rules and regulations. Therefore, this criterion has been met for approval.
2. Within stream or wetland corridors, as defined as 50 feet from the boundary of the
stream or wetland, tree removal must maintain no less than a 75% canopy cover or no
less than the existing canopy cover if the existing canopy cover is less than 75%.
Comment: The subject tree (#85) is not located within a stream or wetland corridor, as
defined above. The gray dashed line is the buffer line for the existing SNRA located on the
northern side of the property. Therefore, this criterion is not applicable to this tree removal
application.
Tree I2emoval Permit City of Tigard 4
SR Design LLC January 30,2009
_
�._._�_.__ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ ..._._
' . . _
� HA2 . 1'1► �3�I�S�qL3i�t� ,N�S ' .
�_ ._ . . ��T�. __ _ _ '�� .. . , . __ �. _ , . ._._ .
' Tnee Nc�mher Sp�; . . �k �- . :- �-� -^. . . .
�i--' -�� lr� .-. - : � _ . ..
( � �s�_� ��. Tc+nk�, / He���ia ln�►Spad:. `� �-
Crown C�ass:Dominar�f:_Co-Dominar�t:�ncluded:____.._____
Speciak Speqmear I�stori� �rest:Tt�e:�In�genou�_ .
Health Rating:�S�ure Rating:�Roat.Struoture Rating:,(2�pg£�-4poJo Haztres--50°/u-70%
� requires profesional car�) . . . :. . ..
, _ . . ��Ht�ry:�a C2�e: E�vwn R�:_F�C�_To�e�: '
. - - . . . _ ._ . . - --- .
� .,comgeta�.ct€rcg:�ors: . .-: :
'��CRGH?�ii�CTBr q��sence�I�vidu��atd rate CtPtr sa+ms+dS►(�seva�mr-r�od�r-'-'iow) . �
.. . _ .
i, :' ,DF.f�LT :.;.�: . : �3'i�i tfiER�IK � . S�AFFOLDS. BRANC}IES
�Poart,�e�._:... _.. , - .
.
...... _
. _ .
..
: . ,
- .:BoW.�ep • .
' :�: .
. �. .h�{i�lEiAle aGadanen5 , .
:'. :::It�udedbetk .• ,
� 'E�ssivaer�dwet�t: .
. �,.��
�:F�n9ets. . .
. : ���;.-, , x
� Wotmds/se�n
• .,::.:;�<�::. ,;
. De�Y
--.� -...•;;.....
, C3vRY .
Con =
- S�d'a!9lsaP flwv .
,:.l:aose/cradce�batfc '. .
.1 � �.!��?Wry1,WWlYCC14YC ' .�+i�Kij` " .
..�. e.::.•.:
r:: r
.� ,.-� ��y����
!...: . :... .;V�YI�iR�W�.�.
. . •',P.i�'t.: ..
� ~�����4 . � .
' :R' n���� ' .
::r1L11il��� " . � . . . . .
• . . ���F1A2AitD RAi7NG;;j;�jyF':^- - - . . _:.. . ,:;:.
� � .. _ _ �s.��sd 'o�+ rs� o� s�n��: v�u .�n�at��:
. . �,� ;,::..;
Tree aarc masc moey Eo caR r�ae�E t-�ar,2-� . ,;;4-seve�e��
���—� �*+� � �aF 1-� �°� . '•.. P-�.:;;"`a
�Z Fai4rtePotenS�. .3� P� (t5vnk 2-&18`(i5=95:i'sh�:';;:1;->'' .
�ll�l � ��+T���_��9 9-18.31F�J5-75cmX 4__?.3p'(/g'an�'�:';,"
±:.: t _ J ....... . :.::.. :
... f��7—��2—�ai�t:ii�•:.
• . •;;'• ;',; : 3—���-�nCisSe�.:.�:'' •.:
HAZ��:�18A�F - . . '�t;�>>:�.:.
..,..: _ . ;.. ..;;;
- � �{; -
'' � ,�, ::�: :
. '.<pie,ri�: a i�a►e�pari=�.,.a�ar�a�d�d n ao�,a dea. �ae, a�ae�cp�, o�� a�:.:a.�pe: -
� :CalilWB�ace:. . • i�e�i�a: Q�ootarnm E1d�y;O�aertai�Q:'mnn�or;�x:-��`..
���= �Rernovetree: Y_".N:`` �? Y N Al�sTaeger Y l�f pihe� ''''�`'•':;;
:'s= -
?'Ei�ecton�ac��ee�-=p�:O� - ' •,,::•.. =,' •
�^.};:
:::�::Not1t'[ea9otr. Qoautqer • ., � ;ir�s:::�
.: b�':D.9��3��► � •,; . ,:�::. .
-.i:._ � ,,..:.t'
. .��. ..
" a;:��,r� _;.� .
- n^i�S. ��, . , , . �_ � . .. ,�.,:�, � ,i`: .
�
. . s— �ds,a_ �. �
�, . . . .
�� ,. •, _ :,j��3..
� . . .
i . '. � - _ _ .. . • . _ . .
� �� � � t�.�S�CR�.��__� -�
. _ ._ . : ..Ti� __ l_ t,'�� . . . .,_ --- . ._._
� Tr�s�+lumher. � �; ���e. JN_ ��--�� �_ . -� •=-. . .
_ . f!
i . i3C�i.: � �#�Tt�s�, t He� �D�T f�a L�t�►Spr��F�.. .
Crown Class:Dominarrf: Co-Dominant: Induded:
, . -----_
� Speciah Specimen' Histotf� �et•Tr�ee:_Indige�ous: !/ .
i � � � . ----- .
� He81th Rating:7� $trudur8 Rating:,�,RoOt.StruCture RSting:_(2090-40%HBZtree--50%-70%
tequir�es profesional care) . _ . . .. ..
�' �!��:�ha C�: C.mwc�R�:_F�L� T� '
. . . � - _ . . . _ _ _ . — .
� . :comoocaad�:�a� - .-:. : -
I � � .�"c7Z�I�Yts�C7sr k��of��3s aia r�e�save�dy(�re.�r�owl . , '
., .. _
� ..: =:';U�C'f :-: >�.- .:. ,. . R003CR�VIM �filA�fK • , S�A�OZDS. BRANCNES ,
. :,, ...... -
•Paart�ec':� .-... - -
I �::6esv_.�. : •
I . ..Mullipfa e�ts
;`.::;k�ded:im�it ..
I • - �E�vee�wagfit:
I • � ;.Cracicsts�ils . .
. <�. . � _ /�'!
I .Gm�i�g-. . . . .
, Wamds/s�sn . .
,y:>;:,.
t]a�+Y ' --
f.aviry '
Cat1
� � -
- ��P� . ..�:,
<:licASe/rra�ied batk '. . .
I �Nesling Fiotdl6ee fave . .;�-r�,:
._ _ ,De�viaodl�.�s . ..
. � �:�'
'8ac�..tfec�taZesta[ds ,
.r�°j. ::Ga::k�5l�l�Ls • �. .
,P,reiiui��a&s�e . , . . _. �.y� . .
i , . �HA2ARD"RATING�i;i:��1i�,`- ' _ —'�j,.�a�er� C7 rece�ai E3 oas�aUral p� sou Le.aring: v-u lxan'd�,�
I T2e Part mast i&ety�� Fad�ae paae�t-►aw;2-me�esq 3ltigix+#-seyeie��N`
i H� :. tn�'°F'?�—� �.� oa�* s+���c v-<s�ts�r i-s-is�{tsrts:ank:<.<;:;�:�;,.� .
r�xe.Pdt�;:s��t+r��=��s ,.. , ..:,,•.r
3-7$.��;'r75sm�4=>,3I1' S'an' .
Only ,:' _ . _..,.:.. �!.: j::;;::
_. t Tam�elra8�7—a�sa�len�2-tntmii�t:�'us�::
.. ��...:.' �::•.� :: '�`� . " 3—��4—coirsianlu$a`':.�::^•``.,.: .
� HA�i�ABAT�3�iT ' . . . i.+�'?,,,',:�i'.i
:;.,-••s����..:::��
. . ' �.. . . .:.�:.�.:�1 �.:.
� ;, . �:':'-;. ... ... . . .
, ��(.�f/IfG� iJ�(}p�".'.:.. :"i.Q�4�G� /f.i��/RI Y�oI II Y�I �y� ��y�' �� � ' �..N: ,''�� i�
' '�'^���!",: � QF�B{� �C��W{4C QlOYM�pO ..� ..�i ..' :�..:�':+..
I :Ma�RFP{�5��� V '�,:. .i...::" .
' !/\ . . �.. ....._ .•k�r
�IR�ftl': Q ICOL L701H1 �Q d21'ay'- {.>•;,.
: •.. ' ' � .Qy'i,Nf�,t�;7{tCi1I�OC"';i'•:'�':.,�
i' '"Rernov8lree: Y".Nr`? Replaee? Y N MoveT� Y N p{� • "r::;''<;-: :�.
_ •''R';
�_�.� - ...'. :��J. '.'
.,�.: ':����-=pt�De� � . , •:
. . �;J.' �•:
, ':1Qotlftca96tr. IIv?qiei C7�:Ll.go�riogaga�r oa6a: • . ',M1;'�•�'.
,: , .
::.:. ,: .,.
.. ;, •.: ..,,;. . ...
I . '•A•.
.. . _,. . . .' . . J �u,., ..:•�'"�• :.
; -.:���?: . ; . �GM l ' � [/4(/�f S' F�/V� ,��.rt.�" '.r'.. .
, I : l.�?f!� c�� . ::;.;;,:...
;���::-;r..
� �`� : .. . . . . �.:::..
I
f �� k�
��
- - - ��-_ - -�-- - - -� - - - - - - -
� i .
_- � i
.�a4------��_— _1—J �� �
__� I/��_ l�'��"�
� ` �����`� f�_-'�r �
-'++ • � `` � �l�!_'��
� -- i� r�� ��''�'7�
I
!� i��B����
' _�—� "TR�EE N0. 85 '
iREE N0. 94 �— 1B'D8H-OAK �-�'
34'D6H-OAK � ��.}�g..�,_.
—�� — ��'' 1A"hPPED HABITAT DY 1" = 40�
TREE N0. 82k83 • i� J- � ,�
7'/4' DBH-ASH � i �U�ORN ,� I
7REE N0. 80 2-iFiUNKS �^1KEE'�JO. 81 i
13'DBH-AS �"—�8-'' HAW HHORN ��' `� � �
Y-�� � �
` J1REE N0. 97 �
�-1�'� �
�� - 11tEE N0. 78 9'DBH-DEGDUOI�S�
-IIg 8"DBH-HAWTFiORN �--- �i �-
C�e"N0.77 � �� �'
1REE N0. 73 � N0.76 7'DBH � ��
12'DBH-ASH . �6��LDER HAVYT�Jf1SN�\\ � /�
�� TRF�N0. 75 I �� � 7REE N0. 72 —v � � //'I
� $DBFI=HAN4tlOR�{� � 40'DBH-OAN I � /
9�
\ � /
�'��g�- 14'�' �.ueb-askl�i�-�� \� �'—'�� / /
r-' .�ee� � � \ � � �i
r i_ �--,, ° �—°—� �
�� — — J � ` \ �___
� /1REE N0. 71 � �� I
� 6�HANlIHORN � ��'
/�/ � ��'/ I/�1����/ �'^ �
—985—� I i�/ i� �
i
J ��/� i ^_J,�a1� ��� ��� �
\ � / � � �
�
—1�7-————-- r ��--i �� /� i
/� � � � \ � /i � � � � �i '�
� �--T86—�`_ � � �/ , / /��
�I � / / / ''
GTCH BA9H // � /l� �_ � �� '� � ��� i
CRAiE= 187.74' � �1� � ��
E IN(� � 186.22' r� i/ / �
/ \ � J 1——__/ �"� /�t9''/i� �// _
/� � \� � — - _i'- ' � i / / �
— — ` — � � � /
� IF. � G — __—__
2'.SIFf1 WLVFRf —___ __ � -- -----
� —— _ ——_ ___ ._r I.E�90.77' �
—�' �-! I.E-18e.15' p,'� �� ^' T A ;'_�— SS
� � $S i L
� 8�� S � � — %
- - � � — �— �—� — �JI� � �
r� ,
___.�%�D► �•,., .. ..�,., � ^u � �....., 1 � I a,w �-, � ,�
�7VLV p � �' h �� x ���� } �� �� �� �< < �C �C n �
16AC � \ � ' . � �� • , , , � . , , , , � � , , , , , , � , � � , , , , , , , �,
, , 4 � , . . . . . , ., .
• ,, ,, , , „ � , , , , ,'� , ,, , ,, , ,, r, ,, , , , , , ,,
, � � . , � � . � \ � � , � � \� � � � � � � � � � � �
X ` y � Y �. �` �` � , � � � � . .
109,75 � ' . , . . . � . , ` . . , � , � \ , . � � . � � . � � , ��� T • , `�• , x
� � . , . � . . . , �. �, �, � ; . . . �, .,
�� ,. .� .. , � , � . � . �. �� �� , � . . .
�,' �X � `�, ' ` „' ` � ` y � � . � � ` �.� ` ��� � � N89-L30E ` � � � � � � � � , ' . . .
� /\ / / / ♦ i � h �� x x
� \ / � � � i � i � i � i � � � � i � � � / � i
8904 � . � � � , ., � �o.� � - � � � , �, . , � ;—
.16 AC
� '� N8&57-30E ���' 85.00 95.50
. 1260Q � ,�
_ 45.00 ^ � ;� 8200 � 78fl0
c� � a
� .20 AC � .22 AC
85.0 9 � 70.00 8Q.50
� f
saflo , m s400
.17 AC m °b .80 AC
j�� �", � W a 8100 O 7900
85.00 ' t��25 0� � W a � .20 AC � .19 AC
� � � 'rJ t/� � r c0
`� W Q N
° 33.00
85.09 75' 70' 9Q.50
1 7 1 0°,
'�700 � = g
.�5 ac �, g 124aQ �, � 8500 0 300 . N o 800�
N N '� N
0 00 .17 AC ° . � A� ° o° .20 AC o°
ao '' �
o N
Z S89-OOW 52� '�
80-40465 -•-
7 7 ' 200' 70. 15" 9Q.50
o S�UTH L1NE DAVID C. GRAHAM DLC 52 0 83-geeo
� \\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\ \ \\\\\ \\\\\\ \\
- � , �
�
F ���44 4 '
J N� ��H� IN� LC 54 ^ N�
�
il
= — — `�..✓ — — . — ' I
� ____� � �
�— � I
_�--_ — �J ..
�7T- � ^^"' �
`'""�
—_ J '
' i P � �11� q� N� ��{�•/"�^ �"-
!r+'� �w+s � r
et� �°° � �_���.�, -� ..-.^�� s a�
0 j L '
� ♦ /_('�L � ���I ��
WM° � � • Y J ...--� � '� .r r� � � _' ^-- "�"7�-- '--' ._.-
`�.' -- I
. -- - - _... _ _-
I ' —' _
� -- �s- -� � ..,�._—`' r _,,_ _�aa---- _"
,�-- 1REE N0. 85 ,,,,. -- `��
TREE N0. 84 18" DBH-OAK � ....-- -`` ��.g-----"`-
34" DBH-OAK
�— 'N7——' �� � �PPED HABITAT B DY 1 " = 40�
TREE N0. 82&83 ° /-- ---�'� `" HAWTHORN r "°
7"/4" DBH-ASH � CLUMP �
TREE N0. 80 2-TRUNKS TR€E 0. 81 i �,,.
13" DBH-AS 1`"_' �g_''� HAWTHORN ✓,.�"�� � ,,.,..--°f� f,.--
� —' J1ap,,.�---° TREE N0. 97 �.�''
�. TREE N0. 78 9" DBH-DECIDUO�--'
`'�1.yg 8" DBH-HAWTHORN i--�- --' ,,,.
�
� -'
i �
RE�fO. 77 --'
TREE N0. 73 ''?REE�NO. 76 7" D8H /.�'" f.�
12" DBH-ASH . ,�..6" ALDER HAWT_F�OR�J''�\ ._.. --�,� � �,.
� TR�E N0. 75 I �-� � TREE N0. 72 � � /'�/ I
��''•-� 'REE N�6���0� � 40" DBH-OAK� I � �
�Y � /
�'���4*��11-A�i ._.._-._..__�\�� \ � � �I'`� /�/ /
� 1
�� i_ � 1 �.--..� —
f — �—� \ o��=Q a �--o ,
I ) �p�'"�� •' l
O � '���! I./�r��
I l TREE N0. 71 \, ° �..--""f ��
f 6 HAWTHORN r- �..-- I
I ,� �'�� ��/'�/ I� ��.� /� '' �
i
I � °�--' ''� �' .-,
_�-es——�' � � �' � � �
/ -.,_./'� r-o �,�,.���/��� �/� -'
�q�' , ,i �.�-
� 1&7- — — —— -.,..� � � \�.-/ �.� /'� �r-
/ ,( ~� � � � � � \ �� / �/ � '
� I -1$8-- ---�� I �--' ���// / ',��"
`` / / /fr
CATCH BASIN �/ �V �.-- � �,,, � /� � �.� �„�-
GRATE = 187.74' -''
IE IN (� = 186.22' \ �� /�/ - -�- - - r''J /'��,��� ".- ��.�
� - �
i
�
/� \ \\ / - _ ' �-.�--'" '' � i� o � �
- - - / _ -� I.E:� C � --- - �- - - -� 1== ===
2'.STEEL CULVERT =- - -- - -- - -
, _ _ -_ _ ._ __ _ �-,--_' I.E�90.77' �
~-_'" /��� I.E=188.15' '` 5'� $�S �` T ''�y -!8"SS _:
.�- g^SS S _ f�
— ��VN� - - � �— '��� � � , �
r� �
�'.'�tf�� r^�u •, n�.� � �� \ �..a,.� � 1 � F�ilAl `� � .
. �J'V�J�J � � ��' � `i� x � �ti }� � �� f� f� f � � � � � r � �� ��
,�� � 1"1� 1� \ � � � \ �f '' � ♦ f / � � � / \ � � ~i \ �� � � � ` �rf ` �� � ~ �� � \ � � \ � f \ � � � ti� / \ �� �
� J � r � i� \ � � � � � � f ♦ � � ♦ r ♦ fti / ♦ � � � ♦
, \ / \ f \ / \ 1 \ \ / \ / � / \ � \ � ti f \ � \ � ti � \ \
!
x � y �r '� � � ` � ti� \� `C � � X
���,]CJ � � � � � � � i � r � � ti � � '' � r � � � � � / � � � � f ♦ r
�� f \ � �nf /\ � \ � `f �� / �/ f � -Cr \� f � � � / f / �� � ♦ /
\ f f / \ \ \ \ \ \ / \ \ ! \
�f r \ � f ` �� � � ~r / \ � f ~ �' , \ �� ` �j/ � ~fti/ J ~ f ��J.�-��F ti `r r � � � � �c � Lf`�� f ti x i � x
\ � \ r \ � � � \ � / / / \ \ 1 \ /
���� ��� � f � � \ � \ / � � ti` � � ��.� � r \ \ � ~ \ � \/ � \ / \ /,—�,.
� � C C C n�+y �
■�� !"L� � ����a]�'�QG ���� �+,�.VL ��.J�
. 1 ���� �
��a.�� � j�� ���� a� ����
r� t
.�� A� R .22 A�
�� � �
��.01
� 7�.00 ��.60
���� � � ����
.� 7 �4� �'r .b � .$� A�
� � � � w � (�
' � I ���LJ t''V t� W � ���� � �.7��
��a.�t� � • � � � �
oQ � w . .20 A� r. .�19 A�
t � °° �� � ° �
� � � �
W ° � 3�.��
��.0� 7�' 7�]'
9�.50
� � �
���� r * �
� Q
.�.�] I'1� (,r'a � � ���� � Vi��� � �7�� " � O
� ' t�l � , V���
� � ' � 7 A� � � o t�
c�
� � . � A� r � .2� AC �
� �
z ��, r
sa�-��v�r
p/� nn /� 1�' 9�.50
L7�+'����� • ■ � � � �VLJr �V� ,
o ���lTH L1N�E DAVID �. G RAHAIUI C�L� 5 0 ��-��eo
� � s�
\\�\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\ \ \\\\\
\\\�\� \\
� N .J N H �i
� ���5�������� ��LC 54 � �,�
Ctty of Tigctrd, Oregon - 1312s S�Hall Blvd. • Tigara, OR 97223
��
� ';�,�
. .
■- ■ � ;'�
March 6, 2009
Ms. Karen Estrada �
9269 SW North Dakota St.
Tigard, OR 97223
I�ear Ms. Estrada,
I'm writing in response to your letter dated February 20, 2009 and e-mail dated February 22, 2009
regarding recent tree removal on the Schenk properry at 9175 SW North Dakota Street and how
Tigard regulates such removal.
A large portion of the Tigard Development Code section 18.790 ("I'ree Removal) is only applicable
to properties involving subdivision, parution, site development review, and conditional use
applications. A Minor Land Partition (MLP2006-00003) had been previously approved for this site
but has since expircd. Outside these development permits, the only protections for trees on private
property are in section 18.790.050 (Permit Applicability). This section protects trees in sensitive
lands (floodplain, drainageways,c��edands, steep slopes, and significant fish and wildlife habitat areas)
by requiring a permit prior to removal. The only exception would be for trees deemed hazardous by
a certified arborist. Based on a site inspection, no permits were required for the trees removed from
this site. �
Trees removed more than 1 year prior to a development application are not subject to 18.790.030
(Tree Plan Requirement). This regulation was written to establish a finite date for determining
which previously removed trees must be identified on a tree plan. Development Codes are revised
periodically as new regulations are needed. Currendy the City is reviewing the e�sting Tree
Removal code. I understand that you receive information about upcoming meetings and hearings
related to tree code revisions and the Urban Forestry Mastex Plan. I encourage you to stay involved
in the tree ordinance revisions over the coming months/years. This public process will offer many
opportunities for you to express your concerns about tree removal on in-fill projects and affect
future code requirements.
In your letter you also expressed concern over the fact that the downed trees had not been removed
from the site. There are no Ciry requirements for the disposal of trees/logs on private property. I
spoke with Mr. Schenk about the wood, and he indicated that it will be removed, but possibly not
until spring/summer.
Phone: 503.639.4171 • Fax: 503.684.7297 . www.tigard-or.gov . TTY Relay: 503.684.2772
If you have further questions or concerns about this issue,please contact me at (503) 718-2437 or at
cher�lc(a�tigard-or.gov. I understand from the City Arborist,Todd Prager,you had intended for
your letter to reach the Tigard Planning Commission. I am forwarding your letter and this response
to the Commissioners.
Sincerely,
(;c�,-�-�, Q , c.�.,.��
Cheryl A. Caines
Associate Planner
c: Tigard Planning Cominissioners
Cheryl Caines
From: Todd Prager
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 2:02 PM
To: Cheryl Caines
Cc: Dick Bewersdorff
Subject: FW: Schenk Partition
Attachments: Letter to City.docx
Dear Cheryl,
My answers the questions below are...
1. Tigard Development Code section 18.790.030 (Tree Plan Requirement) is only applicable to subdivision,
partition,site development review,and conditional use applications. Outside these development permits, the
only protections for trees on private property are in section 18.790.050{Permit Applicability). Section
18.790.050 protects trees in sensitive lands, regardless of their location in the City.
2. There is no disposal requirement for trees/logs on private property in the Code.
3. Trees that are cut a over a year prior to a development application are not subject to 18.790.030 (Tree Plan
Requirement). However,the property will still have protections for trees in sensitive lands. Also, the property
will be required to plant trees as part of the landscaping requirements in 18.745 (Landscaping and Screening).
4. Again,the current tree protection requirements on private property pertain only to trees in sensitive lands.
I would also reiterate to Ms. Estrada to continue to stay involved in tree ordinance revisions over the coming
months/years. This public process will offer many opportunities for her to voice her opinions to decision makers with
authority to amend the Code. She will continue to receive updates by Planning staff about tree related meetings and
hearings.
Thanks,
Todd
From: KEsti128@aol.com [mailto:KEst1128@aol.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2009 3:27 PM
To: Todd Prager
Subject: Re: Schenk Partition
Thank you for following up with me. I have several questions with regard to this and to the intent of the Tree Protection
Plan of the City.
1. Are the tree planning and retention requirements applicable ONLY to those properties for which development and/or
partitioning actually in the request phase?
2. Even though this was not the case of a property owner cutting down a single tree and leaving it on the ground, if I
understand you correctly, he could conceivably leave all of this debris just as it is for years. Although his stated intent was
to partition after the"year"was up, with the current building climate, that could change and these logs could be left
indefinitely and there is nothing requiring clean up that would occur. Is that correct?
3. Knowing that this piece of property had a prior partition request on it, am I correct that, even seeing that the trees that
were to be retained or replaced on that partition were removed, provided a new request was made a year and a day after
cutting down those trees, no tree requirements at all would be in place for a new partition?
4. Are there ANY regulations regarding the removal of trees on vacant land that is located in existing neighborhoods if
the owner is not developing the property?
Although apparently"legal", what has occurred here to avoid the city tree plan and the fact that, particularly now, nothing
may be done to actually develop this property for some time, it seems to me that there may be a hole in the regulations
1
' where�developed neighborhoods exi- hope that this can be addressed in som �,y for the future though it does
nothing in this situation.
I at least want to bring it to the attention of the Planning Department by the attached letter(just for your information)that I
am delivering tomorrow. I would never treat my neighbors in this way, but then, the owner of the property isn't part of the
community.
I thank you again for your very appreciated courtesy in this matter.
Karen
In a message dated 2/20/2009 2:10:59 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, toddCc�tiQard-or.qov writes:
Just wanted to follow up. I inspected the Schenk site with our engineering inspector and found no
violations pertaining to illegal tree removal. It is also not illegal to have downed trees on the property.
The Tigard Development Code does not currently have any sections that would address this type of
situation.
Thanks,
Todd Prager
Associate Planner/Arborist
City of Tigard
503.718.2700
Need a job? Find an emplovment agencv near vou.
2
February 20, 2009
City of Tigard
Planning Department
13125 Hall Boulevard
Tigard, OR97223
I'm writing with regard to property located adjacent to my property on SW North Dakota Street, on which a
Partition permit was issued under No. MLP P2006-00003 to the Daniel Schenk Living Trust in July, 2007. Among
other items,the approval of that permit was conditioned on the preservation or replacement of certain trees in
order for the owner to receive the permit. The property abuts wetlands.
As soon as the permit period of 18 months expired,the owner entered the property to cut down as many of the
trees on the property as possible. According to a conversation he had with one of my neighbors, since the
property was not governed by the permit anymore, he could cut down all of the trees to the wetlands and then
reapply for a permit in another year. At that time,the city would not be able to make any conditions regarding
the trees because they would be gone.
• The owner has no constructed access to his property and appeared to make the assumption that he
could use private driveways for access.
• Possibly resulting from that,the trees that were cut down have been laying there for more than two
months, not even used for firewood.
• The regulations are apparently written so that an owner can get around requirements by simply waiting
until a permit expires, doing what they may wish to the ground, and then reapply in a relatively short
period of time.
• As well as the visual loss of the trees,the resulting lack of clean up of the property affects the actual
monetary value of all the surrounding properties.
• The owner had done nothing with property even in the way of maintenance for at least the eleven years
I have lived next to it until deciding to partition it. The adjacent property owner had actually been
taking care of all of the lawn fronting on North Dakota.
• There has been no concern for those who live around this piece of property, no discussion, and certainly
no regard for the impact of these actions, since the owner of the property does not live here.
I have been observing the physical partitioning of"in fill" pieces of property in this entire area for some time,
and believe that the city development code is not taking the existing neighborhoods nor current property
owners into consideration in the regulations. Since it appears that a piece of property can be "cleared"
separately from actual building permits being issued,we have numerous vacant pieces of property half finished.
As a case in point,the beginning of the development of the property on 95`h and Shady Lane adjacent to 217 left
homes on an "island". Two of those homes have since been abandoned and stand very little chance of being
sold, particularly in the current economic climate.
1/�
I have been paying taxes,voting for the bonds to make my community a better place to live, and invested more
than$60,000.00 in the improvement of my own property since I purchased this house. My rights as a property
owner, and the rights of the six homes adjacent to this property, are just as important as those of the owner of
the property who has created this eyesore. It is a direct result of the planning methods and regulations within
the city that allows for partitioning and clearing of property as a "speculation"that a builder or builders will
appear at some time in the future to do something with the property.
I do not have a lot of answers for this, but it would seem that existing neighborhoods should have regulations
that are different than those where there are large pieces of property in question. At the very least,that
development of any kind could not start on a piece of property without an actual building permit for the
construction of housing on that piece.
The value of every single home adjacent to the cutting down and leaving of these trees has been negatively
impacted, and apparently the city cannot even require that it be cleaned up, much less that there should have
been a tree cutting permit due to the size and age of the trees.
I wasn't happy about the fact that it would be developed as I had understood that all of that area was wetlands
protected, BUT I accepted his rights and from the plan that I saw,there would be protection and replacement of
the value of the existing trees. I didn't know how easily the regulations regarding development could be gotten
around should an owner"not like" what was required. It's odd in a way, because he has actually reduced the
attractiveness of finding anyone who might want to build by not creating beauty on the lots, particularly as he
has to compete with the location next to the freeway.
1 am attaching some photographs of what Is now what I see out my front window,what people see when then
come down the driveway. It's not very pretty. The investment of those who have been here for years has been
diminished by thousands of dollars, not to mention the enjoyment of their homes.
I believe that there needs to be some concrete changes made to protect existing neighborhoods from
unnecessary blight being created because, as 1 was advised,there were"....no violations pertaining to illegal
tree removal. It is also not illegal to have downed trees on the property. The Tigard Development Code does
not currently have any sections that would address this type of situation."
My answer to this is that there needs to be, and could be addressed in the new tree codes, as well as
coordination of development codes. Otherwise, it appears that planning codes are easily manipulated by the
"letter", rather than the"intent"of keeping and creating a livable environment for all.
Sincerely,
`�" `1'`{�`�'^
L�
Ka e Estrada
9269 SW North Dakota Street
Tigard, OR 97223
tC'. d`�•.x:� + '! � 'k } � r �� `r�x' ? � �.." ',' t
R a . .��"1+� �. „/"�� n : '� �`� , �_j�4.�"`1
'� ' . •` t; � '\ ti (� . . 4' Y /� r,
�t�C . � ,P 1 s T �S4 •� •� � f ��• jf f .f ���• r�:
,T�� •.9�.r -' . . . r`:� - `Y� ' :j �0 t (�'j�� • � ;` ��� x ,.A �•� ��
.4.'d�'t � F .�S `?. � lA��tiV �'��'i�"..� f��.l, y�� ��7"'k�� �4
•'1�,1.�y K �� +,•�- J� '�fI _ . ,� . . . ��t��/� '� ' ��' �i� ' �`.G,?'.r Jr��,�.
y a � � .1qS y�`aa. . ? y Y,� !': � ';M � ,i �� v%,� .� ;;�y •
yi ,; ... ZZ .. 1' . . �. . ;` �+4� _ � 1l �, r�� `. :J�
� x�.�} 1 ,-.�� .� �' � . :.• ' �,,�1 .,
•',�.h9;-r M�+�tiryf; �.,� � - Y � � ��� ,� �� , �,� t�r�� �,� i� �j �ii�,F
1�i!���a��t� ��T"~ L� ._t � . ". ' ' �.` �,,`� �� ;' .r r 'Z. T �
s1\� +��h�'�+�f,t , ��' • ` ' <t u� J ; jj k : �,�..
�� ,,, '+xc �� ; �. + �¢ r _1'� �•,� ��� � :
� �` S �. , ► ��� � a I� � •r �
��, � � � , •,x�,.. � y` f �;,��''t '� r �
4�� �{ .,.}^.� � r
� J}'j'�,ik` ' Y � , .� ' '!w+�� �.�. { � 'f+a����N S 4 '�1'� 1.r� -1 v
�'^.-� �1a l�k� .. • .. • (6._ ' , , � � �
�Ry.'c ,+�` . �+��.¢ I,� �i � .« 1�4 i i s� F ��r
�� ♦ # .. , �\" i q{����y, t�. ;�:. �ry .),� �y �! iP
� y��r �'�S rr � 'ft• I� � s'�Y�. � � `�kj 'r, S} �
�'1� 9,`.,��.+tik '• S ' �s=-, �' r , a
�.� --�a y�������`!- �` ,.. �'���`:����: ���. t �l :i�.j. r ;f'�G. ,���, .+�2 �•t� ..
.,i" s��` , , ..r y *� � t ���`Y,1�1,�,� � 1� �
sj'-� , { t�' '�.� !04�. . � :.�i.� y ��" il�"�^ �..1 .•.��-..;' �a!''W
.`�'_ �. .! . � ��A .` � � .. V t4 . 1� ' jti ryy y`��1 � _
. , �a� t ''�h7� ! ��'� � ��
�• \�i�P' . .. � .'.�,I�Y -� ! � l
�., -, �,, . . � ' • , .. � �� fr
��,'�*s►•c '_a'��� �r, �;�: �,�„ a ".... `._ F� ,�"p�:1? ♦ A t
_ � _ +.. ��- -nr�,=;y e�'C __�' _— - ' �' ' �,-,�;
.�� `�',a -.` . y�.. v• s. �� - S� �j �� �� �i� nf ti• r
"F�wa�� � . . ..... _; � �ti•� j� ! r�'^. ,�� � .
. - .. �- � �,1,?�;. ,� .��•' rJ� •r
_ ''��++*:;�i1r.Aj„ie�, _ �� ' � �`'�'�i'�` �� ��a ��j:N! � s
� . �f, R. L � '�. �y"'� s
-'_ci+�'`-��.!� ..•� . � � � ~ �`• '.� .,R
'�'ir-�. � _'::a��-��lTV � .J �,� ��>'.t i„
�we... :.- '� � i:. :
ei'o� "9'6.tL' �� . 0`���� . - . . •y { 3�.
s.:.�w� �'_ ap�'S` - � �� - +.tl t ,�,
����i w .+.�'•��--'" ' ' ' �" . �.� l� � � �.t .i � r ..� - j .
.� " _ _ ' } I� `, / �� � ,.« ���r�. ��i � �n'
� t : � �yw= `�.s ..+'Y�� .�-•. I .�., (� ± • �.- 't i .f �.
.,� '^RI�����L \� -,y� u.LPY�" � _ ( � - L '� �.{ .1r M� SP .
� w�„�—.��cr. _. _ . '_--.sz- . _ �j {-. ,��w,; �r.:,,�. -�'.
,�� � �: . � .. ,4� � -�•�.� ' • ' ��� ��
�-`� 'r-wa�-..�s- - � j '=�r '�� Mii �
::��:�.,-.�,,*i��`;�"t::w�.a+��� ? #, � � �,���',- +:., .
,�� _ _ '.«.' �-�'�., - _ ,-.�: Y ' � -- f -L �, � a �c
� .-.n�r. ..'r a` +►.• r' � � :�� i �a�' �„
—d '��,�.-�e�+t;#ra'�+�.�q4 _- ._+! _- i , _ y ,
� ���� . .�j �`.��'� � .
./-,IfA1! ^ �. _- 1♦ 4'a�1 �.�.� , j e
����w��'i�.'+•." _ �� '��r .� � , ♦. � h j� y •
s..�. ,_.r�t,,�„� T x- •#g'
� �, {.ei'w7,��.�� _�.w�.� '''t,.. _.�. " _ ',�„-.:- �t� s� . t�.. '_� ,.� �
-�r��+.fa}...�1.�fJ��`��e . � +
1�� �.���..��..�- .s�.` _ __ � � ;,�� �;
.� ,s, - "` zi ��. �
r �� •�r:;,��=�� •- . � ' � 'r. � �Ca`
t+�" �.`�+i'a'��/'A:� � �r' ��" • ti. * i.• }•, `�~
`�� � 1�OC � ��.� - �J ��
� '��~ . . rf �+l� ���� t ��. � �
c-a �.. ..,:, a•.�, �r":., '« '►t .� �
i�A�. •e����' <'� ��M ��� . �.��� •� ,� ����'A
�. �rtq., :?d"�i'+: �. .�. �� M � , x. N�ji r� '��'f .��' "" - �\ •-
� �r'1F rl'�6e�, '- . ... ..��, .� �'�:
.�a�. ..t" r+- - � .......�.. . t .9�k _c xn.� r� .,...
��i �' '..711� �y..Y�.��. ...r �.�y,� ..iw�...,�..�, ! T �. �` {. , ��( ' ' ��
• .� r a��av�^•.�w � 'ar i i
�.:.� ���"'7F�3���.,,,n..n;s�,;•_,r vw'� "�.r . ► . ' � i.,'� � �A
��,,.:q:.y�� •1•: :-.,,.�' -_ ' • . . .. . �j, .
.,.� ,A.,v+�t'A- .. . ..w � , ���i t:. e. 1`.3t� , �� �4���.
� . . . . . �. �. - '' . �� � �{. � �, +�`:
♦�%:�� 'i�,i i�S.� '�'�.d.'�M� ' f ;�� ,_�r � r )i� i-� .i,.
.r�w�;"'r ..��r n� �.. ,
'�L- ..s.:c-.:-, � ,,;, + �.. ,
w'...e �''�^ � � � • .' .� ' ?�`ky• �� ��.. �� � ��;� :
7%�����+ ����'�` �"Ir . �'��"w �'�,�� .: � ��.j''�'.
..1.•,' �t +� ���i.��: ~ �� t�t � �''`�., " ' , ��. ,'S
� \ +�r,��,a+.f� . S:iC"..r• .�K► . �. ��^� i� .�1 ���.
�q!.��' _ i. .'�.�`.�+�8�+r-� •` . . ��..� � * .,� �#.A . � ..i.
.!.�y���•+'�',�r'�^^�a nn�'r'� !.«_'_:""�v.._-• _ _' t� � .� " ,: ,��j ;�1 ;i �' T.y
r �i'f`��V!�y:���`. 'v!'r+'�'�.�. � ' d♦ � r 1•, j .�`�i�.. .,*, .
�'��+.if1,� � . . w.• � : . .t :�� ` .'�
"'�..,,:A�'�M.�c'�id '.-.. . _' , � � s ... a►-. t 4» � s .�.,�� �
. r �rt'tl►Y'.T ' •:wr� „ ,r.-. ,,.r �., �' � �.x� . j� R' t � �' `��� .s �t
y �re. 3�,
• ��,'I�+�,�V.,' .:*lw'� �:� � _ ,R'�,."'2„'+i+ . � atij ;, •,{�� . . . . �i y'��'
�•'�" rr t � � ` . �s,� � ��
� .�~� '�; �� � �`., �" � '� � �
� t,� �u�'�"�'sr. ��+ti;j y,.'a'f'°�. .sy�2. • .;�t,y ��'��''4j e� �::�Yti�..�1 S
.���,��:t°'-."�' •arR�''".�: �r� . ...�. -• '�eS-�F . �,�.. . - �.�4r'.'` _ !� - .. .� � .. . .. -
.,i. ,,�rr_�
w
a .� � r
. `� �
F f �� 'I ,r +' j' �
.� _� '
'� � � �� � � �''
r� �.�r, � � �
,
,, .�; ,� ,
� ;� �= r� :�
`r� ' :• ...
.;� g�,' � � J
.'f _ � . .� � [
.. ��q . r�nv I
� � �
' � - ��� .tY� � ,�
�- � '' �
�.�`' :,�°-� �. ��a .
. ; � ��. �
. `� `�► + �j� ,
a i .,
.. �� ;� ��, ,t��
' _ � ' �j�'i
� �;'E �
� �� i i'�1��j'� .,� !
,4 i I '�_.' � � � 4��
r. . ��� � I �� � ���r � �, r f_
�
I '/� ���, �.
� „ � /' , '
: � ,' � j ( .t
;t -�
:� ; ' '! y f
'� ��� �� ��
`+ , , i, , � f
N ' '��` �' �
�;� ��, - ��i,!,� ��
' �� � ��l��P !� .'t
'°�-� �l . �#; , �.��I�.'�� ���r
7�
� d ' �� + / �('/ ,�wr; .
$ s 1''�� � p y / ( ; �.
{i, *� // �r�
,�� � �r. � � ��� ,�j �r� � �.�� �
� a r. � �j i � 1 ) . � �; .
: �. � �;k 1,� �
��r ��� �� � � � �� � J�� �� �� � ��� �
� ,
� ,� L ��� i� t� �.
�� � � !,' . j � � .
�< �_' .;� � '�, 4,y ��' 1 � "� � ;
. � ,1 ,.
��, ; �' ��� � '�I�J
� ' �.� �t ! �� � i I
�� i t � �� �'' + '�, �.
'�_ ' . ' � , �" . , ��� 1. . ����
� � �
��' '1
, ', , �3�''r �� �; ;�' r °� � � , � . , 1�
r�� F. ,� �! e� ��� 1 �
:��' g'���• � � � ,� ! yy�'� �
:.�� ± • �, �'1;; �
�
� -� � ( � �� .�
. J j � � �. A • /I (.1��,�� � �,,
� � � r r� r� I, � `
� � �•,� ' ,i�I f i M
, � � , ,
,� .
��'� ! �,��� � � i ;,�...�h ,���+� :�.} id �
I� � �� ��'� !� I � :� � , ,�I� I �,_ :' .y.
� � � � rR �.r < ��� � � (� , ���1 � ��� � �(i''
� ��� Y 1
� �, ���� .� { � , � � � . .�� '
� �� y/� �� f ;� I + }�+� '���� ��
�
L � ' � J 7 ' .. ,n ' � . '..
�, J � 1 . I � �' f
4 / 1 ,!° �y, ,t..
�.' , � � } � /�`�;� ' I, ',� ,k � r
J � ��; A �
�, % �t �'� � � ,
,i� �� � /i'e '�:� - e + ry •� `I . � r �� !
. h �� � � � . . � ,
' . i. � rt� �� �� ' , '/ '�j �
.��f" f f� . � �� ., '�. � �!
A ' . �r .,��t � '
�,�'' �� �
�; � �, � � ��/ � ,� kt�
� , ''� � ,.> d�r '
� � i� ` ;(- • I/ t ��' �� � -�
/ } % ' �� � r � �, �' '� ,, �'.a
. ,
.
, - ,; ,
r . _
,r , ' .��r/f:� �_ �
. �
i
1 � ,4Y � r� 5
��� ,, � ...� I ���C� �:�'�_, y • ,���� .
� � +
.E�� � - SY • - �
� .. � ; ^ i � . �� �
'; � �'- Y��r . ' + � ..
,~: a�� � � ► • g
_ � �� � . s � �
_ '"' F'' � ! � ` ?, , �•..,�
�� ' z_. �5 �
'» ,.
_, . � � : � ''� ,•� , � ,
�: � ` ....M. ' i �t. .i �.`k ,
- , b, .
,x ; "�� , �.�- l � � ' 4 1 '`' . ,� �?
.�e�,��� ira-�., . �,k:r. . . • .4 1�� �.,
;' � <�, � ,
,� _. �' � - ' ' s� � - � •-,:
•,., , � . . t
�` � ,e;; , �, .
., r `f 3,
. 1 ' ,�' ,1 •aR �� y 1 �� �i• .�k'' '
1" ` � � '� . , 1� *� „ ,i .• �.
l; ' . . r� . ■� ' , . ��,.� .
_ • _ .�y`� . . !• " , � g':
._� ��� .. �` ;�, ,;� k ; ',`' % •'t ��� ' 4
�'` : '`��, � r '� 4 • �� � ���„
. ,i'! � ' • y •` yY � i 1K.. � . � k: f �! � .
` � ,��� .' - ' r � .. � � • � "� ��1
�� � ���°'��a!p��,, .p �� `,4 ', ti�� ���. F; ' �� z ; �
� E1! .,, • �
• r .�_ �,,,y � i .
�.., k t ��� . , � , R ' �
k'."` ��3'�^�'S uy. . .: ► . . �•� ' . � , �'
�� � ' • , � . � ' r ' . ,. _. .
r, � . .4� ' ; �s f�� ��
� r � r . y
'e' !. : _ � � � . . � .. .
^�'j-'� • . . � � ' � +
I � � ; _ , '.+ '� ' �� , � � : t t � f 7 .
� � � �� . . .��, + �i •- . . � ��'_ �r
�.,.'
- � - • -�� y ~' � ` e : Eg..��i. ,. . {'.
.�� ° � i� ' �. 7 �+ ��' � ,
•j �t.
• ., • ' ',, � �� _s � �� �i ' �..`.�.�� # .��.a �� Fa ,.�. ,
. , . � . ��. ' F �� + e _ i L'
, c' :,� y � � •a • . •�� �^ r..
'a � a i ` 1�� ' � ;�f t �` `�; �J' � ^,��-'e'
`s � '�i�' '`(• '��# �,� �„_1`':.�: "�.. :
° '�r�. , � ,`�a� ��,, { ' . , � ;4 �'� `'��t�.�+s_ r
' � + "�� 2r;c
`q. � .�, .�` • � ' '�x. �F ,'�'�;� �
� ' g�x -,.�#� � �`v: �� #� �... �`�`�' j '�`� '��
�, w '�' � ;-�" ?� • , �' .. ..; , { .� �
:,.,.
� � � ��: ��.
� � ;.: � �� �L� \. '�� `'. � ,f, r v � 'i��.t '�� � y�,�,�
� � Y
�`��� �'� � r'a�� •��l � � •t. �`�� *'�i�l��,$
Afa• � � ' �� � �` �`4..y.•.`}�+� � �� �r� , '� �:.
� ,- F •i � ' � . 4. �
wi:' . � s�' . )� ..' , �.
y��� . `+���•'tal� f .t. �1 .. ,� � . 4:
.. � . �. :�"� ' ti.' � ��'�'�; �� �
� �� '�. �� �: : °,��
e � �f �,�
■ �k i � �� r .� ; g''F
' . 1t R �. . , ; � � � f.5 y .
_ �yR r'. � �>. ` � �c� 1
. ��' T 5��. +' � T 1 '� 1��`
� � • ~t ��,v= � `'t � ���°� • •�..
�l,, �� ,-. t�n ; �� �}�� ;� R' _� . . � .
�$ i` , 'r-�` r . < t � t �� � � '' . + 4� d` r'
. f .
x �l. � `� s`• �_� f ��' �� ,'.
��£��4 �:z.�� .#_ . e �'r 1'r\�. � �h� a� � ,t °T � a' '�
. +�S � F' 4�'�. � .' � � V 1� ~'�y • ��. '�! ` � . � •
' ti � . � �� �.., . � � � .
- � � -`� , yCi; �' l ,�
� k ��� �r •. � '1 ��+�+t* �• �*�i'+�, i � S. ,�,.
` � � ���; �� �' Y, e �t�Y e$. . . .� ±' ,�.� i � �� r
�° :t.� � �,�� • �:� � , ' �
��� qr S {�. '�7 � ++ �a+i �� �a �• `- � .• � t�'ti�M .
��i �q �f } �� . 4 � � !�a* �� •; ��,' .. ' ' � ..
y rr � `y« _ ,i � �'�i ■rY�l 1�{ �� }h r 1�x
� •i;k .�+ . �� i • . �' " w ,� � 9� � ��.
y : Y� � ��� • ���. �q �. .h, i�f � � L� t �
� d�, +t 11' ! +�E'�'�s i ! � . '.�• }�'�� 5 � ,� .
b
t y^'
�_
CZty Of Tigard, Oregon 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tiga. OR 97223 !�il)�
. -, �,
r
�
��.
�::;"`
t.
�� � :
s �;:. :;`
.�4;:�
�� � - � �
June 28, 2010
Mr. Daniel Schenk
Ms. Marilyn Adair
7115 SW Virginia Ave.
Pordand, OR 97219
RE: Subdivision case number: MLP2006-00003
Mr. Schenk and Ms. Adair:
On April 27, 2010 the Tigard Ciry Council passed an ordinance to amend the Tigard Communiry
Development Code (TDC) chapters 18.360 Site Developmcnt Rcview, 18.420 Land Partirions, and
18.430 Subdivisions. The approved amendments were in response to the economic downturn.
Automatic extensions were granted to these three types of land use cases that would expire during a
certain time fxame. Our records indicate that you received approval for a Minor Land Partition
(MLP) that may have been affected by this code amendment (see case numbex above).
If your approved MLP has a lapsing date between July 1, 2008 and December 31, 2011, then the
approval is automatically extended through December 31, 2012. The new approval period will lapse
after this date if: 1) the partition has not been recorded or has been improperly recorded with
Washington Counry without the satisfactory completion of all conditions attached to the approval;
or 2) the final recording is a departure from the approved plan.
No action is required on your part for the extension because it is automatic. A copy of this letter
will be placed in the land use file. A copy of the ordinance with adopted language for Land
Partitions is enclosed. If you have any questions or concems regarding the extension or code
amendment,please contact me at (503) 718-2437 or cheryle(c�tigard-or.go�-.
Sincerely,
U t�..� �
b
Cheryl Caines
Associate Planner
Phone: 503.639.4171 . Fax: 503.684.7297 . www.tigard-or.gov . TTY Relay: 503.684.2772
�'
City of Tigard
13125 S�Hall Blvd. '���
Tigard, OR 97223 �`"��+'`� � �; �:� �"'���
w {. , �� �
^"�':.a : � �,.� �:�,�� �:��tvH�>v�,s
, ` .
- - � 1' ��,� � �}t�.44°
a.
� � U3�J4227235 }U����d 28 2Q'G
MAILED FROM ZlPCODE 9722�
Mr. Daniel Schenk
Ms. Marilyn Adair
7115 SW Vv � ' '
Portland,O] ��x;x� �7p ��. ;1 00 oe���of io
RETURN TQ SEh1C�ER
N07 DELZ'VE�iAB�.E AS AppRESSED
UNARLE TO FORWf-iRD
BC: 9'�.a.2�83�7�9 �'13.29-127SE?-29-40
������ai�� I1,1„1,,,1„l,l„1,1,,11,1„1,,,,1),)J„),,,ll,l„I,J„l,,,ll
�
.
.
� � �
City of Tigard
'1'hursda�-, October 18, 2012
Daniel Schcnk and i�laril�-n .�dair
7115 SW �'irginia ����enuc
Pc�rtland, OR 97219
R�':: N(�1'ICE OF E1PTR:A'I�TON OI�I,:ANU USE 1�PPR0V'.1L.
Project Type: �linor Land Partition
Project Name: Schenk Partition
Project Number: �iI,P2006-00003
Tax Lot Number: 1S135D13-84UU
Expiration Date: Dccember 31, ?O1?
Dcar Properry Owners:
'I'he pur��s� of this letter is to ser�-c as a courtes�� reminder that the Land Use ��ppro�-al
listed above �uill e�pire at close of business, �fonda�-, December 31, 2012.
Iii recognirie�n �f the effects of the eccm��mic downturn, the Tigard Cit�� Council passed
De�relopment Code l�mendment (DCi1) 2O10-00001 on ��pril 27, 2010 to ettend until
Dccember 31, 2012 the Land Use .�ppro�-als for Site Develc�pment Rc��ie�vs and �linor Land
Partitions that other�vise w��uld have e�pired bet�veen July� 1, 2008 and December 31, 2O11.
`I'his is incorporated in '1'igard Municipal Code 18.420.030.D.2 ��hich states thar. "���proval
periods for land partitions lapsing benveen Jul�� 1, 2008 and Decembcr 31, 2011 shall be
automaticallt e�tended through December 31, 2012. Nc� further e�tensions �vill be granted."
��ccordin� to our records, your original a�pro�-al for the above project�vould have ehpired
during that�ul�� 1, 2UU8 — Deccmber 31, 2O11 period and that approval was, therefore,
c�tended b5� DC1�2010-00001 until December 31, 2012. No further c�tcnsion is available.
�'<�u can secure }-our Land Use 1�pprot-al against e�pirati��n if��c>u submit a recorded final
plat to this ��ffice prior to cic�se of business, l�fonda��, l�ecembcr 31, 2012. Please let us
know if yc�u anticipate submittin� a recordcd plat.
Sincerel �
,�lbert Shields
I'ro�;ram Dc�-clopment Spccialist
13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171
TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov