HomeMy WebLinkAboutMLP2004-00004 �
NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION
MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2004-00004 �
CITY OF TIGARD
GERTZ PARTITlON c°"""un'ryv��E��""'1`
SFiapingA�etterCommunity
120 DAY = 9 30 2004
SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY
FILE NAME: GERTZ PARTITION
CASE NO: Minor Land Partition (MLP) MLP2004-00004
PROPOSAL: A request for approval of a three (3) lot Minor Land Partition of .63 acres. Parcel
one has an existing home on site. Parcels two and three will be developed with
single-family residences. The lot sizes for this development would be 8,088,
7,715, and 9,065 square feet respectively.
APPLICANT: Kenneth E. Gertz OWNER: Same
Gertz Construction, Inc.
19200 SW 46�' Avenue
Tualatin, OR 97062
ZONING
DESIGNATION: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to
accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential
units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-
family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also
permitted conditionally.
LOCATION: 11480 SW Fonner Street; WCTM 2S103AC, Tax Lot 2300.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390 (Decision-Making Procedures);
18.420 (Land Partitions); 18.510 (Residential Zoning Districts); 18.705 (Access
Egress and Circulation); 18.715 (Density Computations); 18.745 (Landscaping and
Screening); 18.765 (Off-Street parking and Loading Requirements); 18.790 (Tree
Removal); 18.795 (Visual Clearance Areas); and 18.810 (Street and Utility
Improvement Standards).
SECTION II. DECISION
Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has
APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the
decision is based are noted in Section V.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 1 OF 17
�
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIQR TO COMMENCING ANY ONSITE
IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING DEMOLITION, GRADING, CLEAR{NG, EXCAVATION AND/OR FILL
ACTIVITIES:
u mit to the P anning epartment at ew c ei egger , , ext. or review an
approval:
1. Revise the tree/mitigation plan to address removal and mitigation of the two trees marked on the
plan as "remove trees at builder's discretion."
2. Prior to any site work, the applicant shall submit a final Tree Protection Plan that follows the
recommendations of the City Forester, as outlined under the discussion of Chapter 18.790, Tree
Removal, in this decision.
3. Record deed restrictions for those trees that are to be retained on the project site following
completion of the partition improvements.
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT:
u mit to t e ngineering epartment im c i an, 7 , ext. or review an
approval:
4. A Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this pro�ect to cover sewer taps, storm
drainage improvements and any other work in fhe public right-o�-way. Six (6) sets of detailed
public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE:
these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only
include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans
shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City
Hall and the City's web page (www.ci.tiqard.or.us).
5. The PFI permit plan 5ubmittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number
of the individual or corporate entity who will �e3esignated as the "Permittee", and who will
provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is
a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is
incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate
information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents.
6. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall pay the addressing fee. (STAFF CONTACT:
Shirley Treat, Engineering).
7. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of Fonner Street to
increase the right-of-wa to 27 feet from the centerline. The descnption shall be tied to the
existing right-of-way cen�erline and shown on the plat.
8. The applicant shall execute a Restrictive Covenant whereby they agree to complete or partici ate
in the future improvements of SW Fonner Street adjacent to the sub�ect property, when any o�the
following events occur:
A. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for by the
formation of a Local Improvement District,
B. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for in whole or in
part by the City or other public agency,
C. when the improvements are par� of a larger project to be constructed by a third party and
involves the sharing of design and/or construction expenses by the third party owner(s) of
property in addition to the sub�ect property, or
D. when construction of the improvements is deemed to be appropriate by the City Engineer
in conjunction with construction of improvements by others adjacent to the subject site.
9. The applicant shall provide, connection of proposed buildings to the public sanitary sewerage
system. A connection permit is required to connect to the existing public sanitary sewer system.
NOTICE OF DEC►SION MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 2 OF 17
10. The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to
the City's global positioning system GPS) geodetic control nefinrork (GC 22). These monuments
shall be on the same line and shall e of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat
boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground
measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates
can be established by:
• GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey.
. By random traverse using conventional surveying methods.
11. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements:
A. Submit for City review four (4) paper copies of the final plat prepared by a land surveyor
licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative.
B. Attach a check m the amount of the current final plat review fee (Contact
Planning/Engineering Permit Technicians, at (503) 639-4171, ext. 2421).
C. The final plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by
the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05), Washington County, and by the City of Tigard.
D. The right-of-way dedication for Fonner shall be made on the final plat.
E. NOTE: Washington County will not begin their review of the final plat until they receive
notice from the Engineering Department indicatmg that the City has reviewed the final plat
and submitted comments to the applicant's surveyor.
F. After the City and County have reviewed the final plat, submit three mylar copies of the
final plat for City Engineer signature (for partitions), or City Engineer and Community
Development Director signatures (for subdivisions).
Submit to the Planning Department (Mathew Scheidegger, 639-4171, ext. 2437) for review and
approval:
12. Provide a plan showing the type of street tree to be planted and their spacing.
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS:
u mit to t e anning epartment at ew c ei egger, 7 , ext. 7 or review an
approval:
13. Prior to issuance of building permits the Project Arborist shall submit to the City Forester a final
report describing how the Tree Protection Plan was implemented and detailing any failures to
comply with the Tree Protection Plan. The report shall also describe the health of all remaining
trees on the site, with details provided as to any tree that has had its root system disturbed or that
has otherwise been damaged.
Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and
approval:
14. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with
a "photomylar" copy of the recorded final pfat.
15. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Fonner Street
underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee
shall be calculated by the fronta�e of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 35.00
per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $ 6685.00 and it shall be paid prior
to issuance of building permits.
16. During issuance of the building permit for Parcels 2 & 3, the applicant shall pay the standard
water quality and water quantity fees per lot (fee amounts will be tF�e latest approved by CWS).
THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE
DATE OF THIS DECISION NOTED UNDER THE PROCESS AND APPEAL SECTION OF THIS
DECISION.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 3 OF 17
SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Pro ert Histo :
e property is designated Low-Density Residential on the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and Zoning
Map. A search of city records found no previous land use approvals associated with this parcel.
Site Information and Pro osal Descri tions
request or approva o a t ree ot inor Land Partition of .63 acres. Parcel one has an existing
home on site. Parcels two and three will be developed with single-family residences. The lot sizes for
this development would be 8,088, 7,715, and 9,065 square feet respectively.
SECTION IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Notification was sent to property owners within 500 feet of the subJ'ect property and given an opportunity
to comment. Staff received one e-mail and one letter addressing the following concems:
. I think it would be a very bad idea to add more traffic to a very hazardous corner.
. Lack of sidewalk or bike lane this corner is extremel dangerous. I have slowed down and waited
for cars that make that turn and have had to jump in�o the grassy area a few times because they
don't see me.
. Noise and dust from construction disrupts my husband's and my work, which we conduct from our
home.
. How can the City of Tigard allow the removal of trees on the property?
. I don't see why the builder has to squeeze 2 additional homes on this parcel.
STAFF RESPONSE:
According to the Tigard Development Code, there is no spacing standard for driveways within the
influence area of a neighborhood route intersection. The addition of 20 vehicle trips per day added to
SW Fonner St. is not enough to deny a project. However, if the City's Engineering Department finds that
additional trips will create additional hazards or put the street into a lesser classification than its current
state, additional improvements may be required.
The applicant will be responsible for entering into a restrictive covenant for half-street improvements
which include curb gutter and sidewalk. The restrictive covenant is a guarantee that owners of the
homes will participate in street improvements along the entire frontage of the subject property when
ad'oining parcels develop. Requiring street improvements now would be preferable but the added traffic
vo�ume do not make such exactions roughly proportional.
Construction noise and dust is a concern. However, The City of Tigard's Building and Engineering
Departments assign inspectors to all construction projects. It is the job of the inspectors to make sure
that all development is within the guidelines of the Tigard Development Code.
According to the Tigard Development Code, Chapter 18.790 (Tree Removal), an applicant may removed
as many trees needed for construction. However, the applicant must mitigation based on a percentage
of the trees removed.
The Development Code provides the minimum and maximum number of units that can be built, usually
stated as the number of housing units per acre. The zoning for the subject parcel allows two additional
homes to be built. Therefore, the applicant, by state statute has the right to develop his or her property
to the extent that the zone allows.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 4 OF 17
SECTION V. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Land Partitions (18.420):
The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations;
The proposed partition complies or can be made to comply with all statutory and ordinance requirements
and regulations as demonstrated b the analysis contained within this administrative decision and
through the imposition of conditions o�development approval. All necessary conditions must be satisfied
as part of the development and building process. Therefore, this criterion is met.
There are adequate public facilities available to serve the proposal;
Public facilities are discussed in detail later in this decision under Chapter 18.810 (Street & Utility
Improvement Standards). Based on the analysis provided herein, Staff finds that adequate public
facilities are available to serve the proposal. Therefore, this cntenon is met.
All proposed improvements meet City and applicable agency standards; and
The public facilities and proposed im rovements are discussed and conditioned as applicable later in
this decision under Chapter 18.810 �Street & Utility Improvement Standards). Improvements will be
reviewed as part of the permit process and dunng construction, at which time the appropriate review
authority will ensure that City and applicable agency standards are met. Based on the analysis m this
decision, Staff finds that this criterion is met.
All proposed lots conform to the specific requirements below:
The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable
zoning district.
The minimum lot width required for the R-4.5 zoning district is 50 feet. Parcel #1 is approximately 94
feet in width. Parcel #2 is 61 feet in width and Parcel #3 is 72 feet in width. Therefore, this standard has
been met.
The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot, the
accessway may not be included in the lot area.
The minimum lot area requirement in the R-4.5 zoning district is 7,500 square feet for detached
single-family units. The proposed partition creates three (3) lots that are 8,088, 7,715 and 9,065 square
feet respectively. This criterion has been satisfied.
Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet
or have a legally recorded minimum 15 foot wide access easement.
The proposed partition plat illustrates that parcel #1 will have approximately 172 feet of frontage on SW
Fonner Street. Proposed parcel #2 will have 61 feet of frontage on SW Fonner and proposed parcel #3
will have 72 feet of frontage. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied.
Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district.
Setbacks for the R-4.5 zoning district are as follows: front, 20 feet; side, 5 feet; street side, 15 feet; and
rear, 15 feet. The existing home on proposed parcel #1 has a front yard setback of 43 feet, side, 5 feet,
rear, 26.5 feet and a street facing side of 36 feet. Setbacks for the future homes will be reviewed at time
of building permit. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied.
When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard,
provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to
maximize separation from existing structures.
None of the proposed parcels will be flag lots; therefore this standard is not applicable.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 5 OF 17
A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an
accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.745.040.
Screening may also be required to maintain pr�vacy for abutting lots and to provide usable
outdoor recreation areas for proposed development.
The proposed partition does not include a paved drive within an accessway. The proposed lots will have
direct access to SW Fonner St. with their own driveway. Therefore, this standard does not apply.
The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway
would have a detrimental effect on fire-fighting capabilities.
The nearest fire hydrant is approximately 322 feet from the corner of Fonner and Fonner Street.
Therefore, no additional fire hydrants will be required with this partition.
Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one lot, a reciprocal easement
which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition
map.
No common driveway has been proposed. Therefore, this standard does not apply.
Any access way shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.705, Access, Egress and
Circulation.
This standard is addressed under Chapter 18.705 (Access, Egress and Circulation) later in this decision.
Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the one-hundred year
floodplain, the city shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for
greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable
elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance
with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan.
The partitioned lots are not within nor adjacent to a one-hundred-year floodplain. Therefore, this
standard does not apply.
An application for a variance to the standards prescribed in this chapter shall be made in
accordance with Chapter 18.370, Variances and Adjustments. The applications for the partition
and variance(s)/adjustment(s) will be processed concurrently.
No variances or adjustments have been submitted with this application. Therefore, this standard does
not apply.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Land Partition standards have been met.
Residential Zoninq Districts (18.510):
eve opmen s an ar s in resia�ial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.510.2 below:
(See table on the following page)
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 6 OF 17
TABLE 18.510.2
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES
STANDARD R-4.5 Parcel1 Existin home
Minimum Lot Size
-Detached unit 7,500 sq.ft. 8,088 sq.ft.
-Duplexes 10,000 sq.ft.
-Attached unit 5,000 sq.ft.
Average Minimum Lot Width
-Detached unit lots 50 ft. 94 ft.
-Duplex lots 90 ft.
-Attached unit lots
Maximum Lot Coverage -
Minimum Setbacks
-Front yard 20 ft. 43 ft.
-Side facing street on corner&through lots 15 ft. 31 ft.
-Side yard 5 ft. 5 ft.
-Rear yard 15 ft. 26.5 ft.
-Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district —
-Distance between property line and front of garage 20 ft. 27 ft.
-Side Yard Setbacks for Fla Lots DC 18.420.050 A 4 e
Maximum Height 35 ft. n/a
Minimum Landscape Requirement - n/a
A minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet is required for each lot. The proposed lot sizes range from
7,715 to 9,065 square feet. Setbacks for future homes will be reviewed at time of building permits.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Residential Zoning District Standards have been met.
Access, Eqress and Circulation (18.705):
Continuing obli�ation of property owner. The provisions and maintenance of access and eg ress
stipulated in this title are continuing requirements for the use of any structure or parcel of real
property in the City.
Access shall be continually maintained. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied.
Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development
proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by�meeting adequate stacking
needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City
and AASHTO.
The applicant has indicated that the visual clearance area requirement will be met. The applicant shall
indicate the visual clearance area triangles, for all three driveways, on the permit drawings.
Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence
area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersect�ons is that area where
queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway
setback from a collector Qr arterial street intersection shall be150 feet, measured from the right-
of-way line of the intersectin� street to the throat of the proposed drivewa�. The setback may be
�reater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic
impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less
than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the
adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far
from the intersection as possible.
Fonner Street is a neighborhood route; therefore this criterion does not apply.
Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a
collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall
be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 7 OF 17
This criterion does not apply to the existing and proposed driveways along a Neighborhood Route.
Joint Access. Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize
jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses,
structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title,
provided: Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases
or contracts to establish the joint use; and copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts
are placed on permanent file with the City.
Joint access is not proposed with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply.
Public street access. All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and
18.705.0301 shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public
use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis.
The proposed parcels will have access to SW Fonner Street. This standard is met.
Minimum access requirements for residential use. Private residential access drives shall be
provided and maintained in accordance with the provisions of the Uniform Fire Code.
The driveways for the future homes on parcel #2 and #3 will be reviewed for Fire Code compliance at
time of building permit. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied.
Access drives in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the
turning around of fire apparatus by one of the following: a) A circular, paved surFace having a
minimum turn radius measured from center point to outside edge of 35 feet; b) A hammerhead-
configured, paved surface with each leg of the hammerhead having a minimum depth of 40 feet
and a minimum width of 20 feet; c) The maximum cross slope of a required turnaround is 5%.
Driveways for proposed parcels #2 and #3 will not exceed 150 feet in length. Therefore this standard
does not apply.
To provide for increased traffic movement on congested streets and to eliminate turning
movement problems, the Director may restrict the location of drivewa�s on streets and require
the location of driveways be placed on adjacent streets, upon the finding that the proposed
access would cause or increase existing hazardous traffic conditions; or provide inadequate
access for emergency vehicles; or cause hazardous conditions to exist which would
constitute a clear and present danger to the public health, safety, and general welfare.
Staff does not foresee any need to restrict the location of access on the proposed parcels.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Access Egress and Circulation standards have been
met.
Densitv Computations (18.715):
A. Definition of net development area. Net development area, in acres, shall be determined
by subtracting the following land area(s) from the gross acres, which is all of the land
included in the legal description of the property to be developed:
1. All sensitive land areas
2. All land dedicated to the public for park purposes;
3. All land dedicated for public rights-of-way.
4. All land proposed for private streets; and
5. A lot of at least the size required by the applicable base zoning district, if an existing
dwelling is to remain on the site.
B. Calculating maximum number of residential units. To calculate the maximum number of
residential units per net acre, divide the number of square feet in the net acres by the
minimum number of square feet required for each lot in the applicable zoning district.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 8 OF 17
C. Calculating minimum number of residential units. As required by Section 18.510.040, the
minimum number of residential units per net acre shall be calculated b multiplying the
maximum number of units determined in Subsection B above by 80% (0.8�
The standards for density computation provide for the intensity of residential land uses, usually stated
as the number of housing units per acre. The total square footage of the subject property is 27,486
square feet. However, to determine the net developable area, a minimum of 7,500 square feet is
subtracted for the existing house on parcel #1, and 2,618 square feet is subtracted for right-of-way
dedication. This results in a net developable area of 17,368 square feet. As the minimum rot size for
the R-4.5 zone is 7,500 square feet, the maximum number of additional residential units is two (2).
The minimum number of residential units is one (1). The applicant is proposing two additional units.
Therefore, the density for the subject property has been met.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Density Computation Standards have been met.
Landscapinq and Screeninq (18.745):
Street trees: Section 18.745.040
ec ion . 45.040.A.: All development projects fronting on a public street, Private street or a
private driveway more than 100 feet in fength approved after the adoption of this title shall be
required to plant street trees in accordance with the standards in Section 18.745.040C.
This proposed pro'ect has frontage on SW Fonner Street. The applicant has indicated that street trees
will be planted. �herefore, the applicant must provide a plan showing the type of street tree to be
planted and their spacing.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Landscaping standards have not been fully met.
However, if the applicant complies with the condition below, the Landscaping standards
will be met.
CONDITION: Provide a plan showing the type of street tree to be planted and their spacing.
Tree Removal (18.790):
ree p an or t e p anting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall
be provided for any lot„ parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development
application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development or
conditional use is fited. Protection is preferred over removal wherever possible.
The applicant has indicated that there are 26 trees greater than 12-inches in diameter. Of the 26 trees
greater than 12-inches in diameter, two are hazardous and should be removed. Of the 24 viable trees
over 12-inches in diameter, five are to be removed. Therefore, 77 percent of the trees greater than
12-inches are to be saved. However, the tree removed plan indicates two trees on proposed lot#3 may
be removed at the buildings discretion. The applicant will be required to revise the tree/mitigation plan to
address removal and mitigation of the finro trees marked on the plan as "remove trees at builder's
discretion."
The applicant has submitted an arborist report sug esting that orange construction fencing be erected at
the dnp line of the trees. It is difficult to defermine i�any construction will occur within the trees' dnplines.
If construction does occur within the driplines, the Project Arborist must explain or set guidelines for how
the tree roots will be protected."
Below are the City Forester's tree protection plan guidelines:
TREE PROTECTION PLAN REQUIREMENTS
The full text of these following requirements shall be placed on the tree protection plan.
Any tree that will not be removed onsife that is wifhin the limits of disturbance of this project must be
protected. Any free that is locafed on property adjacent to the construcfion projecf fhaf will have more
than 15% of its root sysfem disfur,bed by construction activities shall also be protected.
NOT�CE OF DECISION MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 9 OF 17
Prior to construction, a Tree Protection Plan, conforming fo the lnternational Sociefy of Arboriculture
(ISA) guidelines, shall be submitted wifh fhe proposed construction drawings for review and approva!by
fhe City Forester. This plan shall include fhe exisfing and proposed gradrng confours and a composite
ufility plan to ensure mrn�m�zatron of utility lines and street improvements within fhe specifred tree
protection zone (TPZ). All tree protection devices, along with their details and sp ecifications, shal! be
shown on fhe Tree Protection Plan and shal!show, to scale, exact/y how far fhe tree protection fencing
will be from the face of each protected tree. This plan shall also include the prop osed buildrng footprints
shown in relation to the frees being preserved. These footprints represenf the maximum limits of
disturbance for home consfrucfion and are binding upon the applicanf and future owners of lots within
fhe subdivision.
If construcfion is to occur within the trees' driplines, the applicant, through their Project Arborist, shall
justify the close proximity of the construction activrt�es fo the trees. He shal! certify that the acfivities will
nof adversely impacf the overall and !ong-term health and stabilify of each tree. Any construction that
occurs within the neighboring trees' driplines should be justified by the applicanf and approved by the
City Forester. The applicant shall note that damage inflrcted upon ne►ghboring trees may be subject to
privafe c�v�! action by the ad�oining property owner. Prror to any s�fe work, tree profectron measures
must be Jnstalled around all frees to be retarned. Once insfalled, the City Foresfer must inspecf the free
protection measures. Work may proceed on the site only after the City Forester has approved the
placemenf of the tree protection measures.
Prior to site work, the applicant shall submit a detailed construction schedule to fhe Cify Forester with
notafions as fo when tree profect�on devices will be either installed or removed throughout construction
of the project.
A note shall be placed on the final set of plans indicating that equipment: vehicles, machinery, grading,
dumping, storage, bur�al of debris, or any ofher constructron-relafed acf�vifies shall not be located inside
of any free profect�on zone or outside of fhe limifs of disturbance where other trees are being profected.
A/l tree protection devices shall be:
. Visible.
. Constructed of 11 Gauge stee!chain-link fencing supporfed on at least 2"O.D. steel posts. Each
post shal!be no less than four feet high from the top of grade. Each post shall be driven into the
ground to a depth of no /ess than two and a half feet below grade. Each post shal!be spaced no
further apart than four feet.
. Between each posf, securely aftached to fhe chain-link fencing, shall be a sign indicating that the
area behind the fencing is protected and no construction activity, �ncluding material storage, may
occur behind the fencrng.
. Inspected and approved in the field by the project arborist and City Foresfer prior to clearing,
gradrn�, or the beginning of construction.
. Remain �n place and maintained unfil all construcfion is completed and a frnal inspection is
conducfed.
To determine the size of fhe tree protection zone (TPZ) the project arborist shal! follow one or more of
the guidelines lisfed below:
. For individual frees follow the trunk diameter method. For every one-inch of diameter at breast
height (DBH), or 4 % feet above the ground, allow 12 inches of space from the frunk of the tree.
For example, a free fhat is 15"at DBH must have at least 15'of tree protection zone around the
entire canopy of fhe tree.
. For groups of trees the free profecfion zone must be outside of the drip line of the trees on the
edge of the stand. If there are conifers with narrow crowns on fhe edge of fhe stand foUow the
trunk dramefer method or fhe drrp line mefhod, whichever is greater.
. Calculafe and follow the Op fimal Tree Profecfion Zone calculation as shown in `Trees and
Development: A Technical Guide to Preservation of Trees During Land Developmenf"by Nelda
Matheny and James R. Clark.
. The pro�ect arborist may propose an alternate mefhod for the establishmenf of the TPZ, provided
fhe effort rs coordinated with fhe City Forester.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 10 OF 17
Prior to consfruction, a Tree Profection Plan, conforming fo the Internafional Society of Arboriculture
(ISA) �uidelines, shall be submitted with the proposed construction drawings for review and approva!by
the Cr y Forester. This plan shall include the exisfing and proposed gradmg contours and a compos�te
utility plan to ensure m�nrm�zatron of ufility lines and street improvements wifhin the specified tree
profection zone (TPZ). All free protecfion devices, along with their defails and sp ecifrcations, shal! be
shown on the Tree Protecfion Plan and shall show, fo scale, exact!y how far the tree protecfion fencing
wil!be from the face of each protected free. This plan shall also include fhe proposed burlding foofprints
shown in relafion to fhe trees be�ng preserved. These foofprints represent the maximum limrts of
distur,bance for home construction and are binding upon fhe applicant and future owners of/ofs within
the subdivision.
!f consfruction is to occur within the trees' driplines, the applicant, through their Project Arborisf, shall
justify the close proximity of the construction actrv�ties to the trees. He shall certify that the acfivities will
not adversely impacf the overall and !ong-term healfh and stabilify of each free. Any construction thaf
occurs within the nerghboring trees' driplines should be jusfi�ed by the applicanf and approved by the
Cify Forester. The applicant shall note that damage inflrcfed upon nerghboring trees may be subject to
private crvrl action by the ad�oining property owner. Prior to any site work, tree profect�on measures
must be installed around all trees fo be refamed. Once installed, the City Foresfer musf inspect the tree
profecfion measures. Work may proceed on the site only after the Cify Forester has approved the
placement of fhe tree protecfion measures.
Prior fo site work, fhe applicant shall submif a detailed construcfion schedule to the City Foresfer with
notations as fo when tree protecfion devices wil!be either insfalled or removed throughout consfruction
of the project.
A note shall be placed on the final set of plans indicating that equipment: vehicles, machinery, grading,
dumping, storage, burial of debris, or any other construction-related activrt�es sha!!not be /ocafed ins�de
of any tree protection zone or outside of the limits of disfurbance where other trees are being profecfed.
A!!free protecfion devices shaU be:
. Visible.
. Constructed of 11 Gauge steel chain-link fencing supported on at least 2"O.D. sfeel posfs. Each
post shall be no less than four feet high from the top of grade. Each post shall be driven into fhe
ground fo a depth of no less than two and a half feef beTow grade. Each post shall be spaced no
further apart fhan four feet.
. Between each post, securely attached fo the chain-link fencing, shal!be a sign indicating that the
area behind the fencing is protected and no construction activtty, rncluding material storage, may
occur behind the fenc�ng.
. lnspecfed and approved rn fhe field by the project arborist and City Forester prior to clearing,
grading, or the beginning of construction.
. Rema�n �n place and maintarned until all consfruction is completed and a final inspection is
conducted.
To determine the size of fhe free profecfion zone (TPZ) the project arborist shall follow one or more of
fhe guidelines listed below:
. For individual trees follow the trunk diameter method. For every one-inch of diameter af breast
height (DBH), or 4 % feef above fhe ground, allow 12 inches of space from the trunk of the tree.
For example, a free that is 15"at DBN musf have at least 15'of tree protection zone around fhe
entire canopy of the tree.
. For groups of trees fhe tree protection zone must be outside of fhe drip line of the trees on the
edge of the sfand. !f fhere are conifers with narrow crowns on the edge of the stand follow the
trunk d�ameter mefhod or the drip line mefhod, whichever is greafer.
. Calculate and follow the Op fimal Tree Protecfion Zone calculafion as shown in `Trees and
Developmenf: A Technical Guide to Preservation of Trees During Land DevelopmenY'by Nelda
Matheny and James R. Clark.
. The pro�ect arborisf may propose an alternate mefhod for the esta6lishmenf of the TPZ, provided
the effort is coordinated w�th fhe City Forester.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 10 OF 17
!f it is necessary to enter the tree profection zone at any time with equipmenf trucks, bulldozers, etc. the
project arborist and City Foresfer must be nofified before any enfry occurs. �efore enfering the TP , fhe
pro�ect arborist and City Foresfer shal! defermine fhe method by which entry can occur, along with any
addit�ona!tree protection measures.
The Project Arborist shall submif written reports to the City Forester, at leasf, once every two weeks, as
he monitors the consfruction acfivities and progress. These reports should include any changes fhaf
occurred to the TPZ as well as the condifion and location of fhe tree protection fencing. If the amount of
TPZ was reduced then the Projecf Arborist shall jusfify why the fenang was moved, and sha!!certify that
the construction activities to the trees did not adversely impact the overall and long-ferm health and
stabilify of fhe tree(s). If fhe reports are not submitted or rece�ved by the City Foresfer at the scheduled
intervals, and�f it appears the TPZ's or the Tree Protection Plan is nof being followed by fhe contracfor,
the City will sfop work on the project until an inspecfion can be done by the City Forester and the Project
Arborisf. Thrs �nspection will be to evaluate the free profection fencing, defermine if fhe fencing was
moved af any poinf during construction, and determ�ne rf any part of the Tree Protection Plan has been
violated. If a vrolation has occurred, one or more of the follow�ng penalties will be pursued through fhe
infraction process.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, any party found to be in violation of this chapfer pursuant
fo Chapter 9.96 of the Tigard Munic�pal Code shal!be subject to a civil penalty of up fo $500 and shal!be
required to remedy any damage caused by the violation. Such remediat�on shall include, but not be
limited fo, the followrng:
A. Replacemenf of unlawfully removed or damaged trees in accordance with Secfion 98.790.060 (D)
of the Ti ard DeveloQment Code;and
B. Paymen�of an addiflona!civi!penalty representing the estimated value of any unlawfully removed
or damaged free, as defermined usmg the most currenf Intemational Socrety of Arboriculture's
Guide for Plant Appraisal.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the Project Arborisf shall submit a fina! certificafion indicafing the
elements of the Tree Protectron Plan were followed and thaf al!remaining trees on the site are healfhy,
stable and viable in their modified growing environment.
Section 18.790.040 states that any tree preserved or retained in accordance with this section may
thereafter be removed only for the reasons set out in a tree plan, in accordance with Section
18.790.030, or as a condition of approval for a conditional use, and shall not be subject to
removal under any other section of this chapter. The property owner shall record a deed
restriction as a condition of approval of any development permit affected by this section to the
effect that such tree may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified
arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in
accordance with this section should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. The form of
this deed restriction shall be subject to approval by the Director.
The applicant will be required as a condition of approval to record a deed restriction limiting the removal
of trees that are retained on the project site following completion of the partition improvements, in
accordance with this standard.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Tree Removal standards are not presently met but the
proposal can be made to comply, by the imposition of the following conditions:
CONDITIONS:
. Revise the tree/mitigation plan to address removal and mitigation of the two trees
marked on the plan as "remove trees at builder's discretion."
. Prior to any site work, the applicant shall submit a final Tree Protection Plan that
follows the recommendations of the City Forester, as outlined under the discussion
of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal, in this decision.
. Record deed restrictions limiting the removal of trees that are to be retained on the
project site following completion of the partition improvements.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 11 OF 17
. Prior to issuance of building permits the Project Arborist shall submit to the City
Forester a final report describing how the Tree Protection Plan was implemented
and detailing any failures to comply with the Tree Protection Plan. The report shall
also describe the health of all remaining trees on the site, with details provided as to
any tree that has had its root system disturbed or that has otherwise been
damaged.
Visual Clearance Areas�18.795 :
T �s ap er requires �f�a�ar vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property
adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private
driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, plantin , fence, wall structure, or
temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in heigh� The code provides that
obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three �3) and eight
(8) feet in height. Trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches be ow eight (8)
feet are removed. A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring from the
corner, 30-feet along the right of way and along the driveway and connecting these two points
with a straight line.
According to the applicant, future landscaping will be consistent with this section. The corner of Fonner
and Fonner will not see additional landscaping or fencing that would impact the visual clearance areas.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Visual Clearance standards have been met.
PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS
Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810�
L ap er . proviaes cons ruc ion s an ar s or e implementation of public and private
facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are
addressed below:
Streets:
Improvements:
Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be
improved in accordance with the TDC standards.
Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion
of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC.
Minimum Rights-of-Wa and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a Neighborhood
Route to have a 54 ri h�-of-way width and 32-foot paved section. Other improvemenfs required
may include on-stree� parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting,
storm drainage, and street trees.
This site lies adjacent to SW Fonner Street, which is classified as a Neighborhood Route on the City of
Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 20 feet of right-of-way (ROW) from
centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate the
additional ROW needed to provide for 27 feet from centerline.
SW Fonner Street is currently partially improved. In order to mitigate the impact from this development,
the applicant should enter into a restnctive covenant for future street improvements.
Future Street Plan and Extension of Streets: Section 18.810.030.F states that a future street plan
shall be filed which shows the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the
boundaries of the proposed land division. This section also states that where it is necessary to
give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to
the boundary lines of the tract to be developed and a barricade shall be constructed at the end of
the street. These street stubs to adjoining properties are not considered to be cul-de-sacs since
they are intended to continue as through streets at such time as the adjoining property is
developed. A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the property owners
which shall not be removed until authorized by the City Engineer, the cost of which shall be
included in the street construction cost. Temporary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de-
sac bulbs shall be constructed for stub streets in excess of 150 feet in length.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 12 OF 17
The applicant has indicated that there are no opportunities for future streets due to existing
development. Staff concurs.
Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be
desi�ned with due re ard to providing adequate buifding sites for the use contem��lated
consideration of needs�or convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic anc�
recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography.
Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall
not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of-way line except:
. Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of
water or,pre-existin development or;
. For blocks adjacen� to arterial streets, limited access highways, major collectors or
railroads.
. For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access.
No blocks will be formed with the proposed partition. Therefore, this standard does not apply.
Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements
or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is not possible. Spacing between
connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or
topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards
in the code.
As mentioned above, no blocks will be formed with this application. Therefore, this standard does not
apply.
Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from bein� more than 2.5 times
the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the
applicable zoning district.
Parcel #2 has a lot width of 61 feet. The depth of parcel #2 is approximately 164 feet. All three
proposed parcels are less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size. Therefore, this standard has been
satisfied.
Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public
or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies,
which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide
recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit,
the frontage shall be at least 15 feet.
The smallest of the three parcels has approximately 61 feet of frontage. None of the proposed lots are
considered flag lots. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied.
Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design
standards and be located un both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private
streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side.
The applicant will enter into a restrictive covenant for future half-street improvements that includes
construction of sidewalks.
Sanitary Sewers:
Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each
new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the
provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water
Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or
amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan.
Over-sizin�: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include
consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive
Plan.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 13 OF 17
There is an existing 8-inch sewer in Fonner Street. The applicant's plan indicates that each parcel will
be provided with a sewer lateral connecting to the main line in Fonner Street.
Storm Drainage:
General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for
storm water and flood water runoff.
Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other
drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream
drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the
necessary s�ze of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for
Sanitary and SurFace Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and
including any future revisions or amendments).
There are no upstream drainage ways that impact this site.
Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the
City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing
draina�e facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the develo�ment until
provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have
been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the
Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and SurFace Water Management (as adopted by
Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments).
In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno
Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local
governments institute a sformwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no
net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments
resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the
development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the
storm water n.inoff will be permitted to discharge without detention.
Developments of this small size, especially residential land partitions, are not required to provide on-site
detention. The applicant will be required to pay the water quantity SDC upon application for the building
permit for the two new parcels.
All proposed development within the City shall be desi�ned such that storm water runoff is conveyed to
an approved public drainage system. There is an existing storm line in the north-south leg of Fonner
Street and a lateral from Lot 2 will connect to this system. There is an existing ditch located along the
frontage of the east-west leg of Fonner. Lots 1 and 3 will have laterals for drainage that connects to this
ditch. The applicant will have to provide storm drainage plans showing the improvements in the ROW,
including cleaning and regrading the ditch (as needed to ensure capacity for the discharge from Lots 1
and 3) and installing a culvert across the proposed driveway for Lot 3.
Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways:
Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed
bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for
the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way.
SW Fonner Street is not designated a bicycle facility.
Utilities:
Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric,
communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed
underground, excePt for surface mounted transformers, surFace mounted connection boxes and
meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, tem porary utility service facilities during
construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and:
. The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide
the underground services;
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAC�E 14 OF il
. The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities;
. All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets
by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surFacing of the streets; and
. Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street
improvements when service connections are made.
Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall
pay a fee in-lieu of under-yround�ng costs when the development is proposed to take place on a
street where existing utilities which are not underg round will serve the development and the
approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficult� of under-grounding the
utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The
determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such
situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the
placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An
applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which
are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of
under-grounding.
There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW Fonner Street. If the fee in-lieu is
proposed, it is equal to $35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The
frontage along this site is 191 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $6,685.00.
ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT
Public Water S stem:
e i y o igar provides public water service in this area. The applicant has shown the installation of
two, 1-inch meters for the new lots.
Storm Water Qualit :
e ity as agree to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM regulations established by
Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards �adopted by Resolution and
Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality fac�lities. The facilities
shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm
water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan
shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility
maintained through the year.
The CWS standards include a provision that would exclude small projects such as residential land
partitions. It would be impractical to require an on-site water quality facility to accommodate treatment of
the storm water from the two new parcels. Rather, the CWS standards provide that applicants should
pay a fee in-lieu of constructing a facility, if deemed appropriate. The applicant shall pay the fee in-lieu
for this application.
Gradin and Erosion Control:
esign an ons ruc ion Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of
sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting
from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearin�, and any other activity which
accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control
plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits.
The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb one or more acre
of land. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES
permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or
building permit.
Address Assi nments:
e i y o igar is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within
the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $50.00 per address shall be
assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to final plat approval.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 15 OF 17
Surve Re uirements:
e app ican s ina p at shall contain State Plane Coordinates [NAD 83 (91)] on two monuments with a
tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control nefinrork (GC 22). These monuments
shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat
boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground
measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be
established by:
. GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey.
. By random traverse using conventional surveying methods.
In addition, the applicant's as-built drawings shall be tied to the GPS network. The applicanYs engineer
shall provide the City with an electronic file with points for each structure (manholes, catch basins, water
valves, hydrants and other water system features in the development, and their respective X and Y
State Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD 83 (91�.
Im act Study 18.390
ec ion .3 . states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the
following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:"
Section 18.390.040 states that the a��licant shall provide an impact study to quantify the
effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and
type of im pact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet Cit� standard, and to
minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facil�ties systems, and
affected private property users.
In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real proPerty
interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for Qublic right-of-way
dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly
proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a
condition of ap�roval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the
approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real
property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will
have on the public.
The applicant has submitted an impact study. Any required street im rovements to certain collector or
higher volume streets and the Washington County Traffic Impact Fee �TIF) are mitigation measures that
are required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David
Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of
the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. The total TIF for a
single-family dwelling is $2,530 per unit.
Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on major street improvements
citywide, the TIF fee is $5,060 ($2,530 times two new units). Based on the estimate that total TIF fees
cover 32 percent of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100
percent of this proJ'ects traffic impact is $15,812 ($5,060 divided by .32). Given that the estimated cost of
the dedication and half-street improvements is $13,939 the value of these improvements is less than the
value of the unmiti�ated impacts. The difference between the TIF paid, and the full impact, is
considered the unmitigated impact on the street system $9,617 ($15,812 -$13,939 = $9,617). The
exactions are proportionate.
SECTION VI. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS
. City of Tigard Public Works Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it.
City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 16 OF 17
SECTION VII. AGENCY COMMENTS
Qwest Communications Engineering Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections
to it.
SECTION VIII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION
Notice: Notice was mailed to:
X The applicant and owners
�— Owner of record within the required distance
� Affected government agencies
Final Decision:
THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JULY 20, 2004 AND BECOMES
EFFECTIVE ON AUGUST 4, 2004 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED.
A��eal:
The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are
otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided m Section 18.390.040.G.1. may
appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Communit�r Development
Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director
within ten (10) business days of the date the �Votice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule
and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard,
Oregon 97223.
Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be
confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the
comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may
be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, sub�ect to any additional rules of procedure that
may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body.
THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON AUGUST 3, 2004.
Questions:
yoT�u i�ave any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW
Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171.
i� �� Jul 20 2�04
e ce g
Associate Plan er
Jul 20 2004
. ic ar ewers o
Planning Manager
i:lcurpinlmathew�MLPUnIp2004-00004 decision.doc
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 17 OF 17
. t�ir . .
GEOGftAPHiC iNFORMRT�ON SvStEM
� ^ wA YICINI*lf MAP '
�
,� _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
N A MLP2004-00004
SW BAMBI LN � � � � � � � � � �
a Q � GERTI PARTITION
"�"C N
�t �—
r- •—
SW ER OL ST � �
u�
r-
�
r-
�
� `i� ._�L9 s iF
C
ST •'�,, t-
i�-_, _� ��I -�'�
� � s� � ! ��� � �� ���� �� i
F.
�f '1 `�.�i
.,
e Rq ,,J- �
�. ��/��`��_ p
-r--� . ..` �� oN�T'��.'�_�
........
` � !
�'\��;`� .. � ��gEIARv� p.IR.IiTd"�_F.'!1.
_ r��'YI1 �`� ` � y�
(������5���a:�� �qard AIlB Map �j � /
I
V � N
'�1'�
.— o ,00 zoo 30o aoa Fee�
1"=373 feet I
I
�� ��N C II
NO � 0� City of"Cigard
�1�' Z2 r infamatlon on tNS maD is fo�qenerel iocauon only ane
� � shoultl be veAfied with the Development Services DlvlslOn.
� 73125SW HaI181v0
� Tigard,OR 97223
G (503)6334171
httpYM.ww.ci,tigard.or.us
Community Development Piot date:Jun 2,2004;C:lmagic\MAGIC03.APR
i - -----
_ _
. _ __
- - --
�_ ; 3 _ � ----��___--------�, ----
� S.W. FONNER ST.I � � � ----�v,----- -'
�' 8 -- --� - - -- --
Z �----
I _ . - ----
� — --- — �t — --�N a
I , �x
I EP W A � _ -w- — .—EP -w- _24" DI—I— —L -N� —
� _ — , -W- —B" Cr—'— �f �
i I � —W— _6" CI_ - _'.�-�-- �--��_-�_-___-- -- h —
� :� � ' _-_�---- - �.49' ----�---'--�7Y.11"I '---- �
�i � ��
� ' ' '
60�' � I I PROPOSED ROW DEDICATION
6•�O
I a f� R. .
10.00 � v/1�`
EwsnNc Row I , e � __ �
� ! , ----------------- ,
�s' � � / � ; � �
. �
i EP TO I � � 'zuo' � � �------------� �
�
i
20.00' �� 27.00' c I � i I
PROPOSEO Row��� , ; ex�w000 i i 1 ;
a. I � � ,' � � i
� � �� i ' 8�088 SF. ~I i 3 j (
I d i i� 29' - rni � 9�065 SF � i
� � W I � � �� I ' � I
� z ° , ,
z rt��---�-: -�s.��-�-� ; : !��
� � 4I I � ' �3 a�, • •� E%ISfIHG RESIDENCE � ;n
� TO RF.IMIN I I�I
I I I .� � 1. �. . '� E7l.POND � i �
� � - e i • -/ � 39.0', , � � �
''��—_4Y�•! . : ,�;:' , I I
� I '�' L-------�- ------ ``� i
i �f.J�-" ��� i i
_ _ � � + � �
.�
� . i
.
_.-.., .,., ' �'ecxY.re.rser{ r mer�noee��=.r-i,rn.a ��Sf �\ � I
�`
-' . � � '� �c�xa:�e<r xaQ'aw} �`
I I ��
� �� 1
_�i,_. .r'�� I r------------------------------- .
- ��.a;l I i ��` \ i i
i I I ' ' I
9 �
i � i ��� i
k — -- '— -�- I +�I � � �
' j ``� ��V I
j � I, F � I , Z '��
� i i 7.715 Sf �
i I
II � ' � '
� �
�
� �
I I � � � '�� �� ,
, .
. .
a LG �-----------------------°-------------------------------• • �
�w�
I ----------------�r�.no:-------------------�
PROPOSED ROW DEDICATION
�mo�, CITY OF TIGARD T MLP2004-00004
SITE PLAN N
GERTZ PARTITION
Ma is not to scale
NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION
MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2004-00004 J�
CITY OF TIGARD
GERTZ PARTITIDN C�i+1munity�De-veCopmc�:t
S(a ingA BetterCommumty
DAY = 4
SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY
FILE NAME: GERTZ PARTITION
CASE NO: Minor Land Partition (MLP) MLP2004-00004
PROPOSAL: A request for approval of a three (3) lot Minor Land Partition of .63 acres. Parcel
one has an existing home on site. Parcels two and three will be developed with
single-family residences. The lot sizes for this development would be 8,088,
7,715, and 9,065 square feet respectively.
APPLICANT: Kenneth E. Gertz OWNER: Same
Gertz Construction, Inc.
19200 SW 46th Avenue
Tualatin, OR 97062
ZONING
DESIGNATION: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to
accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory
residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and
attached single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and
institutional uses are also permitted conditionally.
LOCATION: 11480 SW Fonner Street; WCTM 2S103AC, Tax Lot 2300.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390 (Decision-Making Procedures);
18.420 (Land Partitions); 18.510 (Residential Zoning Districts); 18.705 (Access
Egress and Circulation); 18.715 (Density Computations); 18.745 (Landscaping and
Screening); 18.765 (Off-Street parking and Loading Requirements); 18.790 (Tree
Removal); 18.795 (Visual Clearance Areas); and 18.810 (Street and Utility
Improvement Standards).
SECTION II. DECISION
Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has
APPROVED the above request. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted
in the full decision, available at City Hail.
THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FUR 18 M�NTHS
FRQII�'f T�iE EF����IV� �RT� OF THIS D�CISIQN.
All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or
copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25�) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the
time of the request.
SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION
Notice:
otice mailed to:
X The applicant and owners
—� Owner of record within the required distance
�— Affected government agencies
Final Decision:
THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JULY 20, 2004 AND BECOMES
EFFECTIVE ON AUGUST 4, 2004 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED.
Appeai:
The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are
otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may
appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community
Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed
with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The
appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW
Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223.
Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be
confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the
comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may
be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that
may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body.
THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON AUGUST 3, 2004.
Questions:
For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Mathew Scheidegqer at
(503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223.
- -,�T-�---;—r--1--r,--��- --
,_ - ; �-�-�__ I � , , ..,.....,�,.�....,......
� __- --- �'�^ I , � — � v�aNmr na�
--- N ___ L-1 -
. � _ A �z_ � MLP�004-00004 ,
^ 6w W II ��������
- � T� �� GERTI PARTITION �I
r _��
� lWER T
���` y _ '
� r
� __ 1_�� _- � ��.
J c.o.� sT _ - _ T �k I
�
��7���� '�
- � — - - L -- �-�j:���?e-�.. , ,: -;
-- -�._ --1 � �
- - _ �..._
�-� -�--r��-r/�---�- � � ' _r--�-` � �- � _ _
� -�
� � I I � - ,�3 '
---1--J-- � - �---— - �`I � �
J_E _€=_ __�
-- � �r -r--- -- -' - ,.,,��
I -�- .g'
--=�J � � _ .
1 �' �,ryo�,a
----E--- ��- �, R � M��...�µw
H ..__ , ` umm.ww.M
� ��...�.e��� I
__-_1_— _'_---_-
� S.II. PONNER Sf� ¢�� .� _—s`--.
� __ _. _ " _—.�.'—�� '._
�-- g _ __°_..-,.•a--- -
. --
�--- - . __-=-----•_°-�--_�
� -_�_ --------•----
� � 4 ----- -�.-.��•---�-----•-,,.�----..
,--
I i j ����" p I I �a�,,,�
���o �� % ., j r�--------•-i -----••-- �
� � II ° .a I 1 I
� � ��'� „ :.o.:.. �� ,.a �
� i� ' I I� � x� 'y � �
;° {I I I, �•�- I �� I�
K I II' ..� ��` i
�' ----• \ �
� ��� � —nir-------- � �
I ' �
;;I I I �.�......e �°:;-°'°°'a.�„�•� '•\ �''. � �
II' '
,� � ' °------•-_-•...._------°
.__E� �i; ; ( ,.,�� ��� ���� ��� �
, �
. •. .
i� � � .� ,
, ,
� ; , •\ ', I
i� � �
. , ,
r,�„ ......-----•----------- -----------------�-•---•-== ,. ,
-•-----•----••--'°"'----------••-•--•-y
�o.�,m.�.��.
,��e►_ (�TY OF TIGARD � MLP2004-00004
'�°'r"'' N
GERTZ PARTITION
M� la nat to tcale
NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER:
THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER.
NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION CITYOfTIGARD
MINOR LAND PARTITION sh,�p n��ii�t�r�ommunity
DATE OF NOTICE: June 2, 2004
Fi�E NunnBER: MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2004-00004
FILE NAME: GERTZ PARTITION
PROPOSAL: A request for approval of a three (3) lot Minor Land Partition of .63 acres. Parcel one has an
existing home on site. Parcels two and three will be developed with single-family residences.
The lot sizes for this development would be 8,088, 7,715, and 9,065 square feet respectively.
ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to
accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at
a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are
permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally.
APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390,
18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
LOCATION: 11480 SW Fonner Street; WCTM 2S103AC, Tax Lot 2300.
YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS:
Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to
submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT
5:00 PM ON JUNE 17, 2004. All comments should be directed to Mathew Scheideqqer. Associate Planner in the
Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City
of Tigard by telephone at (503} 639-4171 or by e-mail to matts ,ci.tiqard.or.us.
ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE UATE SPECIfIED
QBOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS.
THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS
WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE
IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR JULY,14, 2004: IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A
COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED.
WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL
CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
. Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria
believed to be applicable to this proposal;
. Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to
provide a response;
. Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant
approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue.
Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude
subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings
directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence.
AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE
DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN
500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE
ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED
UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH
CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION.
SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS:
. The application is accepted by the City
. Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a
14-day written comment period.
. The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies.
. City Staff issues a written decision.
. Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all
owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax
assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any
governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the
City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice.
INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW:
The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are
contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development
Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this
service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of
this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments."
—�-T�--r - , -- - -
I __ -L I .,e.....,.,,,o.....e..,...
_-- W-I naN�rir ruu� 'I
� ____----
�� MLP2004-00004
� 5W0 W =_______
-- � GERTI PARTITION '
r N
� SWE T
�`—~— N
\ \\
� ��� �' �,, <.�
sr •aa;;- ``�I
,.
. r ��' ,
_�.. � � ��,
'� �;
z t�==��� i
��o
�...y..y.. � �
_ �
o N
13
�� �
. /' �f Ciry df TiQard
`' 2 r �o:;,�"`�a��..'"a,w
m ' "�ns,.�...
� �w��
� � .�__ �...,..a.o...�
.,,,.
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITYOFTIGARD
�bmmunity�De�veCopment
S(tapingA�etter Community
DATE: lune 2,2004
T0: Mark Vandomelen,Residential Plans Examiner
FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division
STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Associate Planner[x24311
Phone: [5031639-41n/Fax: [5031684-1291
MINOR LAND PARTITION[MLPI 2004-00004
➢GERTZ PARTITION Q
REQUEST: A request for approval of a three (3) lot Minor Land Partition of .63 acres. Parcel one has an
existing home on site. Parcels two and three will be developed with single-family residences. The lot
sizes for this development would be 8,088, 7,715, and 9,065 square feet each respectively. LOCATION:
11480 SW Fonner Street; WCTM 2S103AC, Tax Lot 2300. ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential
District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or
without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached
single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted
conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390,
18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Information for your review. From information supplied by
various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will
be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this
application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JUNE 17, 2004. You may use the space provided
below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please
phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If
you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
_ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
_ Written comments provided below:
Name 8 Number of Person Commenting:
/yI�9 V G`-j - � %
�
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITYOFTIGARD
['ommunity�UeveCopment
ShapingA Better Community
DATE: lune 2,2004
T0: Matt Stine,Ur6an Forester/Public Works Annex RECEIVED PLANNING
FROM: City of Tigard Planning Diuision JUL 0 6 2004
STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheide99er,Associate Planner[x243T1 CITY OF TIGARD
Phone: [5031639-4111/fax: [5031684-729]
MINOR LAND PARTITION[MLPI 2004-00004
➢GERTZ PARTITION Q
REQUEST: A request for approval of a three (3) lot Minor Land Partition of .63 acres. Parcel one has an
existing home on site. Parcels two and three will be developed with single-family residences. The lot
sizes for this development would be 8,088, 7,715, and 9,065 square feet each respectively. LOCATION:
11480 SW Fonner Street; WCTM 2S103AC, Tax Lot 2300. ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential
District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or
without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached
single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted
conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390,
18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Information for your review. From information supplied by
various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will
be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this
application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JUNE 17, 2004. You may use the space provided
below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please
phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If
you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
� We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
_ Written comments provided below:
Name 8� Number of Person Commenting:
1ti��S���r� � z U
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS �� CITYOFTIGARD
�� � Community�De�ve�opment
� �j�a &apingA BetterCotnmunity
DATE: lune 2,2004 >' �
T0: Barbara Shields,Long Range Planning Manager � � 'J� `d°�U
� ���
FROM: City of Ti9ard Planning Diuision �����' `'`
STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Associate Planner[x24311
�
Phone: (5031639-4111/Fax: [503]684-1291
MINOR LAND PARTITION[MLPI 2004-00004
➢GERTZ PARTITION Q
REQUEST: A request for approval of a three (3) lot Minor Land Partition of .63 acres. Parcel one has an
existing home on site. Parcels two and three will be developed with single-family residences. The lot
sizes for this development would be 8,088, 7,715, and 9,065 square feet each respectively. LOCATION:
11480 SW Fonner Street; WCTM 2S103AC, Tax Lot 2300. ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential
District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or
without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached
single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted
conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390,
18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Information for your review. From information supplied by
various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will
be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this
application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JUNE 17, 2004. You may use the space provided
below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please
phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If
you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
� We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
_ Please refer to the enclosed letter.
_ Written comments provided below:
Name 8 Number of Person Commenting:
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITYOFTIGARD
Community,De�aeCopment
SkapingA Better Community
DATE: lune 2,2004
T0: lim wolf,Ti9ard Police Department Crime Prevention oificer REC`�IVED PLANNING
FROM: CityofTigardPlanningDiuision JUN 0 3 2004
STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Associate Planner[x243T1 CITY OF TIGARD
Phone: [5031639-4111/fax: [5031684-)297
MINOR LAND PARTITION[MLPI 2004-00004
➢GERTZ PARTITION Q
REQUEST: A request for approval of a three (3) lot Minor Land Partition of .63 acres. Parcel one has an
existing home on site. Parcels two and three will be developed with single-family residences. The lot
sizes for this development would be 8,088, 7,715, and 9,065 square feet each respectively. LOCATION:
11480 SW Fonner Street; WCTM 2S103AC, Tax Lot 2300. ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential
District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or
without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached
single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted
conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390,
18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Information for your review. From information supplied by
various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will
be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this
application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JUNE 17, 20U4. You may use the space provided
below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please
phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If
you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223.
PL ASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
'� We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
_ Written comments provided below:
Name � Number of Person Commenting: � `_lo`(� �1�- ����
V� �C
' _,
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITYOFTIGARD
('ommunity,1�e�i�eCopment
S�apingA Better Community
DATE: lune 2,2004
T0: Richard lackson,Qwest Communications En9ineerin9 RECEIVED PLANNING
FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division JUN 1 5 2004
STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Associate Planner[x24311 CITY OF TIGARD
Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: t5031684-1291
�IiNOR LAND PARTiT10N[MiP;�0�4-00�04
➢GERTZ PARTITION Q
REQUEST: A request for approval of a three (3) lot Minor Land Partition of .63 acres. Parcel one has an
existing home on site. Parcels two and three will be developed with single-family residences. The lot
sizes for this development would be 8,088, 7,715, and 9,065 square feet each respectively. LOCATION:
11480 SW Fonner Street; WCTM 2S103AC, Tax Lot 2300. ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential
District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or
without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached
single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted
conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390,
18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and ApplicanYs Information for your review. From information supplied by
various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will
be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this
application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JUNE 17, 2004. You may use the space provided
below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond bv the above date, please
phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If
you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
_ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
� Written comments provided below:
�
T�i ,s /a c a-�i�., is n of Lwl , -t� � '�., w e c �" f"e•� ,�,E-e r... .
Name 8� Number of Person Commenting:
,�'i C�l��P t� T/•�/c�"o �✓ SD 3 - Z 50 t - 7 S G �
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITYOFTIGARD
Community�DeveCopment
ShapingA Better Community
DATE: lune 2,2004
T0: PER ATTACNED
FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division
STAFf CONTACT: Mathew Scheide99er,Associate Planner[x243]l
Phone: (5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-T297
MINOR LAND PARTITION[MLPI 2004-00004
➢GERTZ PARTITION Q
REQUEST: A request for approval of a three (3) lot Minor Land Partition of .63 acres. Parcel one has an
existing home on site. Parcels two and three will be developed with single-family residences. The lot
sizes for this development would be 8,088, 7,715, and 9,065 square feet each respectively. LOCATION:
11480 SW Fonner Street; WCTM 2S103AC, Tax Lot 2300. ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential
District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or
without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached
single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted
conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390,
18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Information for your review. From information supplied by
various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will
be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this
application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JUNE 17, 2004. You may use the space provided
below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please
phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If
you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK TNE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
_ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
_ Written comments provided below:
Name 8� Number of Person Commenting:
- • �Y OF TIGARD REQUEST F0. OMMENTS
NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS
FILE NOS.: L
FILE NAME: �� �
CITIZEN INYOLVEMENT TEAMS
14-DAY PENDING APPLICATION NOTICE TO CIT AREA: [�Central ❑East ❑South ❑West �Proposal Descrip.in Library CIT Book
CITY OFFICES
V LONG RANGE PLANNING/Barbara Shields,Planning Mgr. COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT./Planning-Engineering Techs. ✓POLICE DEPT./Jim Wolf,Crime Prevention O�cer
76UIL�ING DIVISION/Gary Lampella,Building Official .�ENGINEERING DEPT./Kim McMillan,�vlpmnL Review Engineer L/PUBLIC WORKS/Matt Stine,Urban Forester
CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,City Recorder ✓PUBLIC WORKS/Brian Rager,Engineering Manager
�PLANNER—POST PROJECT SITE IF A PUBLIC HEARING 1TEM-10 BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARINGI
SPECIAL UISTRICTS
TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.+1 V TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE+� �TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT+i _ CLEANWATER SERVICES+M
Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Offce Lee Walker/SWM Program
75707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO 8ox 745 155 N.First Avenue
Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124
LOCAL QN�STATE IURISDICTIONS
ICITY OF BEAVERTON � CITY OF TUALATIN �M' OR.DEPT.OF FISH 8 WILDLIFE _aR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS
Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue M8IIf1(�2 W00C�(WLUN Form Required)
Irish 8unnell,�evelopment Services 18880 SW Martinazzi Avenue PO Box 59 775 Summer Street NE
PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 5alem,OR 97301-1279
Beaverton,OR 97076
_ OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM.
METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING� _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IN�. 550 Capitol Street NE
CITY OF DURHAM � 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-138o
City Manager Portland.OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232
PO Box 23483 Bob Knight,DalaResourceCenter(ZCA) US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG.
Durham,OR 97281-3483 Paulette Allen,GrowthManagementCoordinator OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP Kathryn Harris
Mel Huie,GreenspacesCoordinator(CPA/ZOA) Lafry F�0f1Ch(Comp.PlanAmentlmentsOn�y) Routing CENWP-OP-G
CITY OF KING CITY� Jennifer Budhabhatti,Regional Planner(Wetlantls) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 PO Box 2946
City Manager _ C.D. Manager,GmwlhManagementServices Salem,OR 97301-2540 Portland,OR 97208-2946
15300 SW 116th Avenue
King City,OR 97224 WASHINGTON COUNTY�
OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY�Powedines in nrea) _OR.DEPT OF AVIATION @+onopo�e Tawersl Dept.of Land Use&Transportatic
Bonneville Power Administration Tom Highland,Planninp 155 N.First Avenue
CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO � Routing TTRC—Attn: Renae Ferrera 3040 25th Street,SE Suite 35D,MS 13
Planning Director PO Box 3621 Salem,OR 97310 'I ro OR 97124
PO Box 369 Portland,OR 972�8-3621 St ve Conwaycce��a�novs.>
Lake Oswego,OR 97034 _Gregg Leion ican�
OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ODOT,REGION 1 � Brent Curtis tcan�
CITY OF PORTLAND (Nolify(or Wetlands antl Po[ential Envimnmental ImOacts) _M8f3h D3f11@ISOfI,Development Review Coordinator _DOfI2 M9L0J8(ZCA)MS 14
Planning Bureau Director Regional Administrator Cari Toland, Right-of-Way Section Na�no�:> _Sr.Cartographer,�P.a��,MS,.
1900 SW 4�h Avenue,Suite 4100 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders
Portland,OR 97201 Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037
WA.CO.CONSOL.COMM.AGNCY ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A� ODOT,RAIL DIVISION _STATE HISTORIC
Dave Austincwccca�••9��^,Mo�o�.To..�•� Jane Estes,PertnilSpecialist (NOIIfyIfODOTRlR-Hwy.CroeslnBisOnlyACCessloLand� PRESERVATION OFFICE
PO Box 6375 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350 Craig Reiley (Notiy It Proparty Has HD Overlay)
Beaverton,OR 97007-0375 Portland,OR 97221-2414 555-13'"Street,NE,Suite 3 1115 Commercial Street,NE
Salem,OR 97301-4179 Salem,OR 973D1-1012
UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES
PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERNlSANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(e��i��9co�NortherNSanla Fe WR Predecessor)
RobeR I.Melbo,President&General Manager
110 W. 10th Avenue
Albany,OR 97321
50UTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS COMCAST CABLE CORP. _TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT.
Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debfe P81171ef�nnnexauonsoniy� Randy Bice ,5...w�da••���n (IfProjectiSWilhin'/.Miieofa7ransilRoute)
I 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Ben Baldwin,Project Planner
Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street
Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland,OR 97232
✓PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC V NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY _VERIZON �QWEST COMMUNICATIONS
Ken Gutierrez,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord. Ken Perdue,Engineering Richard Jackson,Engineering
9480 SIN Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue PO Box 1100 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110
ilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Beaverton,OR 97075-1100 Portland,OR 97219
i IGARDlTUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 _COMCAST CABLE CORP. _COMCAST CABLE CORP.
arsha Butler,Administrative Offices Jan Youngquist,Demographics Alex Silantiev c5..��aMw���, Diana Carpenter,w,.Ed�.����,
6960 SW Sandburg Street 16550 SW Merlo Road 9605 SW Nimbus Avenue,Bldg. 12 3500 SW Bond Street
Tigard,OR 97223-8039 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Beaverton,OR 97008 Portland,OR 97232
� INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN 500'OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANY/ALL
CITY PROJECTS(Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notify). n:�pattyvnasters�Request For Comments Notiflcation Lis�.doc (UPDATE�: 12•May-04)
(Also update:`i:�curpin�setup�abels�annexation utilities and tranchises.doc'when updating Ihis document)
� f ,
• ''�.Y:.
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITYOFTIC3ARD
(,'ommunity�UeveCopment
ShapingA Better Commuriity
DATE: lune 2,2004
T0: Brian Ra9er,Public Works Engineering Manager
FROM: Cit�of Tigard Planning Division
STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Associate Planner[x24311
Phone: [503)639-4111/Fax: [5031684-1291
MINOR LAND PARTITION[MLPI 2004-00004
➢GERTZ PARTITION Q
REQUEST: A request for approval of a three (3) lot Minor Land Partition of .63 acres. Parcel one has an
existing home on site. Parcels two and three will be developed with single-family residences. The lot
sizes for this development would be 8,088, 7,715, and 9,065 square feet each respectively. LOCATION:
11480 SW Fonner Street; WCTM 2S103AC, Tax Lot 2300. ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential
District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or
without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached
single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted
conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390,
18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Information for your review. From information supplied by
various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will
be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this
application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JUNE 17, 2004. You may use the space provided
below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond bv the above date, please
phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If
you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
_ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
—/ Please contact of our office.
� Please refer to the enclosed letter.
_ Written comments provided below:
Name 8� Number of Person Commenting:
DATE: June 10, 2004
�/ �'
� C� J
TO: � Richard Sattler, Water Operations Supervisor C � �ff �'
�r. ,,
� Howard Gregory, Streets Supervisor � �'� �.'-' ,�; �-''
� Eric Hand, Wastewater Operations Supervisor=�%�� �-_
FROM: Brian Rager, Engineering Manager�'��
RE: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATION
Gertz Partition
MLP 2004-00004
Attached is a "Request for Comments" for the above-named project. Please route these
materials between you for review. In order for me to provide a composite set of comments back
to Planning by June 17, 2004, I will need to get your comments or questions back to me no later
than June 16, 2004.
If you would like to discuss this project in more detail, please let me know. We can meet
individually or as a group.
PAGE 1
✓
Dear Mathew Scheidegger,
I am writing to you in regard to the decision to approve a 3 lot Minor Land Partition
2004-00004, File name Gertz Partition of.63 acres on Fonner across from Elton Court in Tigard.
My husband and I have several issues concerning this approval and would like our comments to
be considered as part of your decision.
First, my husband and I both work from home. My husband is a Test Engineer who
telecommutes and I am a Professional Potter. My husba�d's office looks directly at the land
parcel in question. 3 windows in the office can be opened for ventilation. I am assuming that the
building of the 2 other houses on that land will be anything but a quiet process let alone a "clean"
one. Recently when work was done on the existing house on the property, noise as well as con-
struction debris was a problem. Stones being cut for the pillars created a dust cloud around our
house and neighborhood.The air was unbreathable the entire day for about a half of a block on
Fonner. It is my concern that my husband will not only have noise to contend with during work
hours but also the inability to have proper ventilation in his of�ce. �th my work as a Potter,
ventilation is again a paramount concern. Clay dust and glaze fumes have a direct impact on my
health without proper ventilation. Having the excessive construction dust runs in direct conflict
for both my work and my husbands. Without ventilation, my work comes to a halt.
Second, our house sits on what is affectionately called by many of my neighbors as "dead
man's curve". When we first moved in a year ago, many longtime neighbors delighted in inform-
ing us in how many cars plowed into what is now our backyard. My chief concern here has to do
with construction trucks and equipment parked on Fonner as well as our own Elton Court.
Anything that may hamper visibility coming around that curve may have disastrous results for
us.There is also the concern of families living on Elton Court not being able to navigate in and
out of our small street with heavy equipment parked randomly.
Thirdly, the vast numbers of trees marked for removable begs the question if the City of
Tigard was approached about such removal. I am familiar with the strict guidelines that the City
of Tigard adheres to when it comes to the removal of healthy trees on Tigard properties and am
concerned why that was "rubber stamped".
In closing, it is hardly the fault of the builder to have us located directly across from him.
Perhaps it would have been easier if my husband and I both worked away from home during the
day and were not subjected to what will surely be a toxic environment mentally and physically.
Also, it seems odd that this builder has to squeeze 2 other houses on this parcel just to make
money. I can't imagine that the people renting in the existing houseon tbat property will enjoy
this process any more than us. Possible solutions to my concerns could entail flag people every
day that work commences to ensure safe passage of Fonner.As for the construction dust and
debris, I am at a loss as to how to control the air quality issue other than saying deny the petmit
and let the builder put his houses on a different lot.
My husband and I are available for further contact on this issue.
James andAndrea O'Reilly
11533 SW Elton Court
Tigard, Oregon 97223
503-645-7367 business phone
Page 1 of 1
��
Matt Scheidegger- MLP 2004-40004
�4=e .� �. ._ti_�_�« .,.��� .�.�,�6�.� ..H��.�,o.s.ff«.���« �,A.:�.�..,�w��,��.��� ���,�������_..������r. ���::
From: "Russ and Tena"<rt.oehler@verizon.net>
Ta: <matts@ci.tigard.or.us> �
Date: 6/9/2004 9:32 AM
Subject: MLP 2004-00004
Matthew Scheidegger
I am emailing you in response to the letter about pa�titioning the land on the corner of Fonner
and 115th St. I think it would be a very bad idea to add more traffic to a very hazardous
corner. I run in the morning and with the overgrown trees and iack af sidewalk or bike lane this
corner is extremely dangeraus. I have slawed dawn and waited for cars that make that turn
and have had to jump inta the grassy area a few times because they don't see me.
lf you have people pulling out of a side road there it will cause some major problems because
they will not be seen until it is tao late.
Thanks far your time.
Tena Oehler
12972 SW 113th Place
�
�
file://C:�Documents%20and%20Settings�natts\Local%20Settings\Temp\GW}00002.HTM 7/6/2004
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
DATE: 7/14/04
TO: Matt Scheidegger, Associate Planner
FROM: Kim McMillan, Development Review Engineer°��yr�
RE: Gertz Partition MLP2004-00004
Access Manaqement(Section 18.705.030.H)
Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with
all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and
streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and
deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and
AASHTO.
The applicant has indicated that the visual clearance area requirement will be
met. The applicant shall indicate the visual clearance area triangles, for all three
driveways, on the permit drawings.
Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be
placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections.
Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic
commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway
setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be150 feet,
measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat
of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the
influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact
report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a
project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore
any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is
not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the
intersection as possible.
Fonner Street is a neighborhood route, therefore this criterion does not apply.
Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways
and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of
driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum
spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet.
This criterion does not apply to the existing and proposed driveways along a
Neighborhood Route.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 1
Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810):
Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of
public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and
drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below:
Streets:
Improvements:
Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets
adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards.
Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width
planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved
in accordance with the TDC.
Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a
Neighborhood Route to have a 54 right-0f-way width and 32-foot paved
section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking,
sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm
drainage, and street trees.
This site lies adjacent to SW Fonner Street, which is classified as a
Neighborhood Route on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present,
there is approximately 20 feet of ROW from centerline, according to the most
recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate the additional ROW
needed to provide for 27 feet from centerline.
SW Fonner Street is currently partially improved. In order to mitigate the impact
from this development, the applicant should enter into a restrictive covenant for
future street improvements.
Future Street Plan and Extension of Streets: Section 18.810.030.F states
that a future street plan shall be filed which shows the pattern of existing and
proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land division.
This section also states that where it is necessary to give access or permit a
satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to the
boundary lines of the tract to be developed and a barricade shall be
constructed at the end of the street. These street stubs to adjoining
properties are not considered to be cul-de-sacs since they are intended to
continue as through streets at such time as the adjoining property is
developed. A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the
property owners which shall not be removed until authorized by the City
Engineer, the cost of which shall be included in the street construction cost.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 2
Temporary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de-sac bulbs shall be
constructed for stub streets in excess of 150 feet in length.
The applicant has indicated that there are no opportunities for future streets due to
existing development. Staff concurs.
Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape
of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building
sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient
access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of
limitations and opportunities of tvpography.
Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks
formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of-
way line except:
• Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or
other bodies of water or, pre-existing development or;
• For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, major
collectors or railroads.
• For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides
equivalent access.
PLANNING
Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections
on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street
connection is not possible. Spacing between connections shall be no
more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or
topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict
adherence to other standards in the code.
PLANNING
Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being
more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5
times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district.
PLANNING
Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of
frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land
partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a
minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access
easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling
unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet.
PLANNING
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 3
Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to
meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial,
collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets
shall have sidewalks on at least one side.
The applicant will enter into a restrictive covenant for future half-street
improvements that includes construction of sidewalks.
Sanitary Sewers:
Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be
installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to
existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and
Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as
adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future
revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive
plan.
Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems
shall include consideration of additional development within the area as
projected by the Comprehensive Plan.
There is an existing 8-inch sewer in Fonner Street. The applicant's plan
indicates that each parcel will be provided with a sewer lateral connecting to the
main line in Fonner Street.
Storm Drainage:
General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make
adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff.
Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a
culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate
potential runofF from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or
outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary
size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction
Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by
Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or
amendments).
There are no upstream drainage ways that impact this site.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 4
Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it
is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from
the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and
Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have
been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions
have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the
development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards
for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water
Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments).
In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek
and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that
plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater
detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net
increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that
all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide
onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno
Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff
will be permitted to discharge without detention.
Developments of this small size, especially residential land partitions, are not
required to provide on-site detention. The applicant will be required to pay the
water quantity SDC upon application for the building permit for the two new
parcels.
All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water
runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. There is an existing
storm line in the north-south leg of Fonner Street and a lateral from Lot 2 will
connect to this system. There is an existing ditch located along the frontage of
the east-west leg of Fonner. Lots 1 and 3 will have laterals for drainage that
connects to this ditch. The applicant will have to provide storm drainage plans
showing the improvements in the ROW, including cleaning and regrading the
ditch (as needed to ensure capacity for the discharge from Lots 1 and 3) and
installing a culvert across the proposed driveway for Lot 3.
Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways:
Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments
adjoining proposed bikeways identifed on the City's adopted
pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of
such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way.
SW Fonner Street is no designated a bicycle facility.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 5
Utilities:
Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those
required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services
and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface
mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter
cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service
facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at
50,000 volts or above, and:
• The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving
utility to provide the underground services;
• The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted
facilities;
• All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains
installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the
surfacing of the streets; and
• Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing
the street improvements when service connections are made.
Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states
that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the
development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities
which are not underground will serve the development and the approval
authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-
grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in
conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-
by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a
short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the
placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground
utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by
utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public
right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-
grounding.
There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW Fonner Street.
If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage
that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 191 lineal feet;
therefore the fee would be $ 6685.00.
ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND
UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS:
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 6
Public Water System:
The City of Tigard provides public water service in this area. The applicant has
shown the installation of two 1-inch meters for the new lots.
Storm Water Qualitv:
The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM)
regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and
Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which
require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities
shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100
percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious
surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the
frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained
through the year.
The CWS standards include a provision that would exclude small projects such
as residential land partitions. It would be impractical to require an on-site water
quality facility to accommodate treatment of the storm water from the two new
parcels. Rather, the CWS standards provide that applicants should pay a fee-in-
lieu of constructing a facility, if deemed appropriate. The applicant shall pay the
fee-in-lieu for this application.
Gradinq and Erosion Control:
CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to
reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public
storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction,
grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates
erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an
erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City
permits.
The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any
development that will disturb one or more acre of land. Since this site is
over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit
from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with
the site and/or building permit.
Address Assiqnments:
The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the
City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee
in the amount of$ 50.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to
the City prior to final plat approval.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 7
Survev Requirements
The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates [NAD 83 (91)] on
fin►o monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic
control nefinrork (GC 22). These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be
of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the
coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements
to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates
can be established by:
• GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey.
• By random traverse using conventional surveying methods.
In addition, the applicant's as-built drawings shall be tied to the GPS nefinrork.
The applicanYs engineer shall provide the City with an electronic file with points
for each structure (manholes, catch basins, water valves, hydrants and other
water system features) in the development, and their respective X and Y State
Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD 83 (91).
Recommendations:
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO
APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT:
Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642)
for review and approval:
. A Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this project to
cover sewer taps, storm drainage improvements and any other work in the
public right-of-way. Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall
be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans
are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should
only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public Facility
Improvement (PFI) permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public
Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the
City's web page (www.ci.tiqard.or.us).
. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address
and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be
designated as the "Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance
for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a
corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which
the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact
person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering
Department will delay processing of project documents.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 8
. The applicant's PFI submittal shall include visual clearance area triangles at
all three driveways.
. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall pay the addressing fee.
(STAFF CONTACT: Shirley Treat, Engineering).
. The applicant shall execute a Restrictive Covenant whereby they agree to
complete or participate in the future improvements of SW Fonner Street
adjacent to the subject property, when any of the following events occur:
A. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or
paid for by the formation of a Local Improvement District,
B. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or
paid for in whole or in part by the City or other public agency,
C. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be constructed
by a third party and involves the sharing of design and/or construction
expenses by the third party owner(s) of property in addition to the
subject property, or
D. when construction of the improvements is deemed to be appropriate
by the City Engineer in conjunction with construction of improvements
by others adjacent to the subject site.
. The applicant shall provide connection of proposed buildings to the public
sanitary sewerage system. A connection permit is required to connect to the
existing public sanitary sewer system.
. The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two
monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic
control nefinrork (GC 22). These monuments shall be on the same line and
shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary.
Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert
ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to
grid north. These coordinates can be established by:
• GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey.
• By random traverse using conventional surveying methods.
. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements:
A. Submit for City review four (4) paper copies of the final plat prepared
by a land surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or
narrative.
B. Attach a check in the amount of the current final plat review fee
(Contact Planning/Engineering Permit Technicians, at (503) 639-4171, ext.
2421).
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 9
C. The final plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum
standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05),
Washington County, and by the City of Tigard.
D. The right-of-way dedication for Fonner shall be made on the final plat.
E. NOTE: Washington County will not begin their review of the final plat
until they receive notice from the Engineering Department indicating that the
City has reviewed the final plat and submitted comments to the applicant's
surveyor.
F. After the City and County have reviewed the final plat, submit three
mylar copies of the final plat for City Engineer signature (for partitions), or
City Engineer and Community Development Director signatures (for
subdivisions).
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS:
Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642)
for review and approval:
. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide the
Engineering Department with a "photomylar" copy of the recorded final plat.
. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW
Fonner Street underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee
in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the
site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 35.00 per lineal foot. If the
fee option is chosen, the amount will be $ 6685.00 and it shall be paid prior
to issuance of building permits.
. During issuance of the building permit for Parcels 2 & 3, the applicant shall
pay the standard water quality and water quantity fees per lot (fee amounts
will be the latest approved by CWS).
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 10
.
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITYOFTIGARD
(orrrlaweity�Deve(npment
Sfiaping f7 Better Community
I, �Pat�icia L Lu Q being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Se�ciorA�minis�rative SpeciaCst for
the City of7'tgar�askington County, Orrreg�mc and that I served the following:
{Check Appropnate Box(s)Below)
0 NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: MLP2004-00004/GERTI PARTITION
❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference)
� City of Tigard Planning Director
A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked E1�hlblt"A",and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to
each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list{s), marked Exhibit'B",and by reference made a part
hereof, on lUhl 20,2004, and deposited in the United States Mail on 1111Y 20,2004, postage prepaid.
�'
/� r ' f� l�F�lL�t-/
(Person Pre oti e
,S7,y12E O�F O�ECON
�'�of�,l rngton ss
?iB
Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the� day of ' , 2004.
OFFICIAL SEAL �
" SUE ROSS
NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON f��� � �
COMMISSION N0.375152 �
MY COMMIS510N D(PIRES DEC.1,2007 My mission Expires:
�>.
':;
�l:,'
. �
EXNIBIT�
NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION
MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2004-00004 ���
CITY OF TIGARD
GERTZ PARTITION c�mmunily�����r��,�n�,�t
S�apinglt�Bctter�`onrmunity
20 DAY = 30 200
SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY
FILE NAME: GERTZ PARTITION
CASE NO: Minor Land Partition (MLP) MLP2004-00004
PROPOSAL: A request for approval of a three (3) lot Minor Land Partition of .63 acres. Parcel
one has an existing home on site. Parcels two and three will be developed with
single-family residences. The lot sizes for this development would be 8,088,
7,715, and 9,065 square feet respectively.
APPLICANT: Kenneth E. Gertz OWNER: Same
Gertz Construction, Inc.
19200 SW 46th Avenue
Tualatin, OR 97062
ZONING
DESIGNATION: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to
accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential
units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-
family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also
permitted conditionally.
LOCATION: 11480 SW Fonner Street; WCTM 2S103AC, Tax Lot 2300.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390 (Decision-Making Procedures);
18.420 (Land Partitions); 18.510 (Residential Zoning Districts); 18.705 (Access
Egress and Circulation); 18.715 (Density Computations); 18.745 (Landscaping and
Screening); 18.765 (Off-Street parking and Loading Requirements); 18.790 (Tree
Removal); 18.795 (Visual Clearance Areas); and 18.810 (Street and Utility
Improvement Standards).
SECTION II. DECISION
Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has
APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the
decision is based are noted in Section V.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 1 OF 17
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY ONSITE
IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING DEMOLITION, GRADING, CLEARING, EXCAVATION AND/OR FILL
ACTIVITIES:
u mit to t e anning epartment at ew c ei egger , , ext. or review an
approval:
1. Revise the tree/mitigation plan to address removal and mitigation of the two trees marked on the
plan as "remove trees at builder's discretion."
2. Prior to any site work, the applicant shall submit a final Tree Protection Plan that follows the
recommendations of the City Forester, as outlined under the discussion of Chapter 18.790, Tree
Removal, in this decision.
3. Record deed restrictions for those trees that are to be retained on the project site following
completion of the partition improvements.
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT:
u mit to t e ngineering epartment im c i an, , ext. or review an
approval:
4. A Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this pro ect to cover sewer taps, storm
drainage improvements and any other work in fhe public right-o�way. Six (6) sets of detailed
public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE:
these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only
include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans
shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City
Hall and the City's web page (www.ci.tigard.or.us).
5. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number
of the individual or corporate entity who will �e�c esignated as the "Permittee", and who will
provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is
a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is
incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate
information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents.
6. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall pay the addressing fee. (STAFF CONTACT:
Shirley Treat, Engineering).
7. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of Fonner Street to
increase the right-of-way to 27 feet from the centerline. The descnption shall be tied to the
existing right-of-way centerline and shown on the plat.
8. The applicant shall execute a Restrictive Covenant whereby they agree to complete or participate
in the future improvements of SW Fonner Street adjacent to the sub�ect property, when any of the
following events occur:
A. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for by the
formation of a Local Improvement District,
B. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for in whole or in
part by the City or other public agency,
C. when the improvements are par� of a larger project to be constructed by a third party and
involves the sharing of design and/or construction expenses by the third party owner(s) of
property in addition to the subject property, or
D. when construction of the improvements is deemed to be appropriate by the City Engineer
in conjunction with construction of improvements by others adjacent to the subject site.
9. The applicant shall provide connection of proposed buildings to the public sanitary sewerage
system. A connection permit is required to connect to the existing public sanitary sewer system.
- NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 2 OF 17
10. The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to
the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network (GC 22). These monuments
shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat
boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground
measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates
can be established by:
. GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey.
. By random traverse using conventional surveying methods.
11. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements:
A. Submit for City review four (4) paper copies of the final plat prepared by a land surveyor
licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative.
B. Attach a check in the amount of the current final plat review fee (Contact
Planning/Engineering Permit Technicians, at {503) 639-4171, ext. 2421).
C. The final plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by
the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05), Washington County, and by the City of Tigard.
D. The right-of-way dedication for Fonner shall be made on the final plat.
E. NOTE: Washington County will not begin their review of the final plat until they receive
notice from the Engineering Department indicating that the City has reviewed the final plat
and submitted comments to the applicanYs surveyor.
F. After the City and County have reviewed the final plat, submit three mylar copies of the
final plat for City Engineer signature (for partitions), or City Engineer and Community
Development Director signatures (for subdivisions).
Submit to the Planning Department (Mathew Scheidegger, 639-4171, ext. 2437) for review and
approval:
12. Provide a plan showing the type of street tree to be planted and their spacing.
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS:
u mit to t e anning epartment at ew c ei egger, , ext. or review an
approval:
13. Prior to issuance of building permits the Project Arborist shall submit to the City Forester a final
report describing how the Tree Protection Plan was implemented and detailing any failures to
comply with theTree Protection Plan. The report shall also describe the health of all remaining
trees on the site, with details provided as to any tree that has had its root system disturbed or that
has otherwise been damaged.
Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and
approval:
14. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with
a "photomylar" copy of the recorded final pfat.
15. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Fonner Street
underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee
shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 35.00
per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $ 6685.00 and it shall be paid prior
to issuance of building permits.
16. During issuance of the building permit for Parcels 2 & 3, the applicant shall pay the standard
water quality and water quantity fees per lot (fee amounts will be the latest approved by CWS).
THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE
DATE OF THIS DECISION NOTED UNDER THE PROCESS AND APPEAL SECTION OF THIS
DECISION.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 3 OF 17
SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Pro ert Histo :
e property is designated Low-Density Residential on the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and Zoning
Map. A search of city records found no previous land use approvals associated with this parcel.
Site Information and Pro osal Descri tions
request or approva o a t ree ot inor Land Partition of .63 acres. Parcel one has an existing
home on site. Parcels two and three will be developed with single-family residences. The lot sizes for
this development would be 8,088, 7,715, and 9,065 square feet respectively.
SECTION IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Notification was sent to property owners within 500 feet of the subject property and given an opportunity
to comment. StafF received one e-mail and one letter addressing the following concerns:
. I think it would be a very bad idea to add more traffic to a very hazardous corner.
. Lack of sidewalk or bike lane this corner is extremely dangerous. I have slowed down and waited
for cars that make that turn and have had to jump into the grassy area a few times because they
don't see me.
. Noise and dust from construction disrupts my husband's and my work, which we conduct from our
home.
. How can the City of Tigard allow the removal of trees on the property?
. I don't see why the builder has to squeeze 2 additional homes on this parcel.
STAFF RESPONSE:
According to the Tigard Development Code, there is no spacing standard for driveways within the
influence area of a neighborhood route intersection. The addition of 20 vehicle trips per day added to
SW Fonner St. is not enough to deny a project. However, if the City's Engineering Department finds that
additional trips will create additional hazards or put the street into a lesser classification than its current
state, additional improvements may be required.
The applicant will be responsible for entering into a restrictive covenant for half-street improvements
which include curb gutter and sidewalk. The restrictive covenant is a guarantee that owners of the
homes will participafe in street improvements along the entire frontage of the subject property when
ad1'oining parcels develop. Requiring street improvements now would be preferable but the added traffic
volume do not make such exactions roughly proportional.
Construction noise and dust is a concern. However, The City of Tigard's Building and Engineering
Departments assign inspectors to all construction projects. It is the job of the inspectors to make sure
that all development is within the guidelines of the Tigard Development Code.
According to the Tigard Development Code, Chapter 18.790 (Tree Removal), an applicant may removed
as many trees needed for construction. However, the applicant must mitigation based on a percentage
of the trees removed.
The Development Code Provides the minimum and maximum number of units that can be built, usually
stated as the number of housing units per acre. The zoning for the subject parcel allows two additional
homes to be built. Therefore, the applicant, by state statute has the right to develop his or her property
to the extent that the zone allows.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 4 OF 17
SECTION V. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Land Partitions (18.4201:
The proposed partition co�nplies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations;
The proposed partition complies or can be made to comply with all statutory and ordinance requirements
and regulations as demonstrated b the analysis contained within this administrative decision and
through the imposition of conditions o�development approval. All necessary conditions must be satisfied
as part of the development and building process. Therefore, this criterion is met.
There are adequate public facilities available to serve the proposal;
Public facilities are discussed in detail later in this decision under Chapter 18.810 (Street & Utility
Improvement Standards). Based on the analysis provided herein, Staff finds that adequate public
facilities are available to serve the proposal. Therefore, this criterion is met.
All proposed improvements meet City and applicable agency standards; and
The public facilities and proposed im rovements are discussed and conditioned as applicable later in
this decision under Chapter 18.810 �Street & Utility Improvement Standards). Improvements will be
reviewed as part of the permit process and during construction, at which time the appropriate review
authority will ensure that City and applicable agency standards are met. Based on the analysis in this
decision, Staff finds that this criterion is met.
All proposed lots conform to the specific requirements below:
The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable
zoning district.
The minimum lot width required for the R-4.5 zoning district is 50 feet. Parcel #1 is approximately 94
feet in width. Parcel #2 is 61 feet in width and Parcel #3 is 72 feet in width. Therefore, this standard has
been met.
The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot, the
accessway may not be included in the lot area.
The minimum lot area requirement in the R-4.5 zoning district is 7,500 square feet for detached
single-family units. The proposed partition creates three (3) lots that are 8,088, 7,715 and 9,065 square
feet respectively. This criterion has been satisfied.
Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet
or have a legally recorded minimum 15 foot wide access easement.
The proposed partition plat illustrates that parcel #1 will have approximately 172 feet of frontage on SW
Fonner Street. Proposed parcel #2 will have 61 feet of frontage on SW Fonner and proposed parcel #3
will have 72 feet of frontage. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied.
Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district.
Setbacks for the R-4.5 zoning district are as follows: front, 20 feet; side, 5 feet; street side, 15 feet; and
rear, 15 feet. The existing home on proposed parcel #1 has a front yard setback of 43 feet, side, 5 feet,
rear, 26.5 feet and a street facing side of 36 feet. Setbacks for the future homes will be reviewed at time
of building permit. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied.
When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard,
provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to
maximize separation from existing structures.
None of the proposed parcels will be flag lots; therefore this standard is not applicable.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 5 OF 17
A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an
accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.745.040.
Screening may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable
outdoor recreation areas for proposed development.
The proposed partition does not include a paved drive within an accessway. The proposed lots will have
direct access to SW Fonner St. with their own driveway. Therefore, this standard does not apply.
The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway
would have a detrimental effect on fire-fighting capabilities.
The nearest fire hydrant is approximately 322 feet from the corner of Fonner and Fonner Street.
Therefore, no additional fire hydrants will be required with this partition.
Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one lot, a reciprocal easement
which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition
map.
No common driveway has been proposed. Therefore, this standard does not apply.
Any access way shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.705, Access, Egress and
Circulation.
This standard is addressed under Chapter 18.705 (Access, Egress and Circulation) later in this decision.
Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the one-hundred year
floodplain, the city shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for
greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable
elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance
with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan.
The partitioned lots are not within nor adjacent to a one-hundred-year floodplain. Therefore, this
standard does not apply.
An application for a variance to the standards prescribed in this chapter shall be made in
accordance with Chapter 18.370, Variances and Adjustments. The applications for the partition
and variance(s)/adjustment(s) will be processed concurrently.
No variances or adjustments have been submitted with this application. Therefore, this standard does
not apply.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Land Partition standards have been met.
Residential Zoninq Districts (18.510):
eve opmen s an ar s in resicl�ial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.510.2 below:
(See table on the following page)
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 6 OF 17
TAB LE 18.510.2
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES
STANDARD R-4.5 Parcel1 Existin home
Minimum Lot Size
-Detached unit 7,500 sq.ft. 8,088 sq.ft.
-Duplexes 10,000 sq.ft.
-Attached unit 5,000 sq.ft.
Average Minimum Lot Width
-Detached unit lots 50 ft. 94 ft.
-Duplex lots 90 ft.
-Attached unit lots
Maximum Lot Coverage -
Minimum Setbacks
-Front yard 20 ft. 43 ft.
-Side facing street on corner&through lots 15 ft. 31 ft.
-Side yard 5 ft. 5 ft.
-Rear yard 15 ft. 26.5 ft.
-Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district ---
-Distance between property line and front of garage 20 ft. 27 ft.
-Side Yard Setbacks for Fla Lots TDC 18.420.050(A 4 e
Maximum Height 35 ft. n/a
Minimum Landscape Requirement - n/a
A minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet is required for each lot. The proposed lot sizes range from
7,715 to 9,065 square feet. Setbacks for future homes will be reviewed at time of building permits.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Residential Zoning District Standards have been met.
Access, Eqress and Circulation (18.705):
Continuing obli�ation of property owner. The provisions and maintenance of access and egress
stipulated in this title are continuing requirements for the use of any structure or parcel of real
property in the City.
Access shall be continually maintained. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied.
Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development
proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking
needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washingfon County, the City
and AASHTO.
The applicant has indicated that the visual clearance area requirement will be met. The applicant shall
indica�e the visual clearance area triangles, for all three driveways, on the permit drawings.
Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that drivewa�s shall not be permitted to be �laced in the influence
area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where
queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway
setback from a collector er arterial street intersection shall be150 feet, measured from the right-
of-way line of the intersectin� street to the throat of the proposed drivewa�. The setback may be
�reater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic
impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less
than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the
adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far
from the intersection as possible.
Fonner Street is a neighborhood route; therefore this criterion does not apply.
Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a
collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall
be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 7 OF 17
This criterion does not apply to the existing and proposed driveways along a Neighborhood Route.
Joint Access. Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize
jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses,
structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title,
provided: Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases
or contracts to establish the joint use; and copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts
are placed on permanent file with the City.
Joint access is not proposed with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply.
Public street access. All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and
18.705.0301 shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public
use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis.
The proposed parcels will have access to SW Fonner Street. This standard is met.
Minimum access requirements for residential use. Private residential access drives shall be
provided and maintained in accordance with the provisions of the Uniform Fire Code.
The driveways for the future homes on parcel #2 and #3 will be reviewed for Fire Code compliance at
time of building permit. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied.
Access drives in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the
turning around of fire apparatus by one of the following: a) A circular, paved surFace having a
minimum turn radius measured from center point to outside edge of 35 fieet; b) A hammerhead-
configured, paved surface with each leg of the hammerhead having a minimum depth of 40 feet
and a minimum width of 20 feet; c) The maximum cross slope of a required turnaround is 5%.
Driveways for proposed parcels #2 and #3 will not exceed 150 feet in length. Therefore this standard
does not apply.
To provide for increased traffic movement on congested streets and to eliminate turning
movement problems, the Director may restrict the location of drivewa�s vn streets and require
the location of driveways be placed on adjacent streets, upon the finding that the proposed
access would cause or increase existing hazardous traffic conditions; or provide inadequate
access for emergency vehicles; or cause hazardous conditions to exist which would
constitute a clear and present danger to the public health, safety, and general welfare.
Staff does not foresee any need to restrict the location of access on the proposed parcels.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Access Egress and Circulation standards have been
met.
Density Computations (18.715):
A. Definition of net development area. Net development area, in acres, shall be determined
by subtracting the following land area(s) from the gross acres, which is all of the land
included in the legal description of the property to be developed:
1. All sensitive land areas
2. All land dedicated to the public for park purposes;
3. All land dedicated for public rights-of-way.
4. All land proposed for private streets; and
5. A lot of at least the size required by the applicable base zoning district, if an existing
dwelling is to remain on the site.
B. Calculating maximum number of residential units. To calculate the maximum number of
residential units per net acre, divide the number of square feet in the net acres by the
minimum number of square feet required for each lot in the applicable zoning district.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 8 OF 17
C. Calculating minimum number of residential units. As required by Section 18.510.040, the
minimum number of residential units per net acre shall be calculated b multiplying the
maximum number of units determined in Subsection B above by 80% (0.8�
The standards for density computation provide for the intensity of residential land uses, usually stated
as the number of housing units per acre. The total square footage of the subject property is 27,486
square feet. However, to determine the net developable area, a minimum of 7,500 square feet is
subtracted for the existing house on parcel #1, and 2,618 square feet is subtracted for right-of-way
dedication. This results in a net developable area of 17,368 square feet. As the minimum lot size for
the R-4.5 zone is 7,500 square feet, the maximum number of additional residential units is two (2).
The minimum number of residential units is one (1). The applicant is proposing two additional units.
Therefore, the density for the subject property has been met.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Density Computation Standards have been met.
Landscapinq and Screeninq (18.745):
Street trees: Section 18.745.040
ection . 45.040.A.: All development projects fronting on a public street, private street or a
private driveway more than 100 feet in length approved after the adoption of this title shall be
required to plant street trees in accordance with the standards in Section 18.745.040C.
This proposed proJ'ect has frontage on SW Fonner Street. The applicant has indicated that street trees
will be planted. Therefore, the applicant must provide a plan showing the type of street tree to be
planted and their spacing.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Landscaping standards have not been fully met.
However, if the applicant complies with the condition below, the Landscaping standards
will be met.
CONDITION: Provide a plan showing the type of street tree to be planted and their spacing.
Tree Removal (18.790):
tree p an or t e p anting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall
be provided for any lot„ parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development
application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development or
conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal wherever possible.
The applicant has indicated that there are 26 trees greater than 12-inches in diameter. Of the 26 trees
greater than 12-inches in diameter, two are hazardous and should be removed. Of the 24 viable trees
over 12-inches in diameter, five are to be removed. Therefore, 77 percent of the trees greater than
12-inches are to be saved. However, the tree removed plan indicates two trees on proposed lot#3 may
be removed at the buildings discretion. The applicant will be required to revise the tree/mitigation plan to
address removal and mitigation of the two trees marked on the plan as "remove trees at builder's
discretion."
The applicant has submitted an arborist report suggesting that orange construction fencing be erected at
the drip line of the trees. It is difficult to determine if any construction will occur within the trees' dnplines.
If construction does occur within the driplines, the Project Arborist must explain or set guidelines for how
the tree roots will be protected."
Below are the City Forester's tree protection plan guidelines:
TREE PROTECTION PLAN REQUIREMENTS
The full text of these following requirements shall be placed on the tree protection plan.
Any tree that will not be removed onsite that is within fhe limits of disfurbance of this project must be
protected. Any tree fhat is located on property adjacent fo the construction project that w�ll have more
than 15% of ifs root system disturbed by consfruction acfrvrties shal!also be protected.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 9 OF 17
Prior to construction, a Tree Protection Plan, conforming fo fhe lnternafional Society of Arboriculture
(ISA) �uidelines, shall be submitfed with the proposed constructron drawings for review and approva!by
the Cr y Forester. This plan shal! include fhe exisfing and proposed grad�ng contours and a composrte
utility plan to ensure min�mizatron of ufilify lines and sfreef lmprovemenfs within fhe specifred tree
protecfron zone (TPZ). Al! tree protection devices, along wifh their detarls and sp ecifications, sha11 be
shown on the Tree Protection Plan and shall show, to scale, exactly how far the tree protecfion fencing
will be from the face of each protected tree. This plan sha11 also include the proposed building footprints
shown in relation fo the trees being preserved. These foofprints represent the maximum limrts of
disturbance for home construcfion and are binding upon the applicant and future owners of lots within
the subdivision.
If construction is to occur within the trees' driplines, the applicant, fhrough their Project Arborisf, shall
justify the close proximity of the construction actrvrbes to the trees. He shall cert�fy that the activities will
not adversely impacf fhe overall and long-term health and sfability of each tree. Any construcfion thaf
occurs within the neighboring frees' driplines should be justified by the applicant and approved by the
City Forester. The applicant shal! note that damage infl�cted upon ne�ghboring frees may be subject fo
private civ�l action by the ad�oining property owner. Prror to any site work, tree protection measures
must be installed around all frees to be reta�ned. Once installed, the City Forester must inspect fhe tree
protecfion measures. Work may proceed on the site only after the City Forester has approved the
placement of fhe free protection measures.
Prior to site work, the applicant shall submit a detailed construction schedule to the City Forester with
notations as fo when tree protection devices will be eifher installed or removed throughout construction
of the project.
A note shall be placed on the final set of plans indicating that equipment, vehicles, machinery, grading,
dumping, storage, burral of debris, or any other construct�on-relafed activifies shall not be located ►nside
of any tree protect�on zone or outside of fhe limits of disturbance where other trees are being protected.
All tree protection devices shall be:
. Visible.
. Construcfed of 91 Gauge steel chain-link fencing supported on at least 2"O.D. steel posts. Each
post shall be no less than four feet high from the top of grade. Each post shall be driven rnto the
ground to a depth of no less than two and a half feet below grade. Each post shall be spaced no
further apart than four feet.
. Between each post, securely attached to the chain-link fencing, shall be a sign indicafing fhat the
area behind the fencing is protected and no construction acfivrty, rncluding maferial sforage, may
occur behind fhe fenc�ng.
. lnspecfed and approved rn the �eld by fhe project arborist and City Forester prior fo clearing,
gradrng, or the beginning of construction.
. Rema�n in place and marnfa�ned until all construction is complefed and a fina! inspection is
conducted.
To determine the size of the tree protection zone (TPZ) fhe projecf arborist shall follow one or more of
fhe guidelines listed below:
. For individual trees follow the trunk diamefer method. For every one-inch of diamefer af breast
height (DBH), or 4 % feet above the ground, allow 12 inches of space from the trunk of the tree.
For example, a tree that is 15"at DBH must have at leasf 95'of tree protection zone around the
entire canopy of the tree.
. For groups of trees the tree protection zone must be outside of the drip line of the trees on fhe
edge of the stand. If there are conifers with narrow crowns on fhe edge of the stand follow the
trunk d�ameter method or the drip line method, whichever is greater.
. Calculate and follow the Op timal Tree Protection Zone calculat�on as shown in `Trees and
Development: A Technical Guide to Preservation of Trees During Land Development"by Nelda
Matheny and James R. Clark.
. The project arborist may propose an alternate method for fhe establishment of the TPZ, provided
the effort is coordinated wrth the City Forester.
NOTICE OF DECI510N MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 10 OF 17
!f it is necessary fo enter fhe tree protection zone at any time with equipmenf (frucks, bulldozers, etc.) the
project arborist and City Forester must be noti�ed before any entry occurs. Before enfering the TPZ, fhe
pro�ect arborist and City Foresfer shall determine the method by which entry can occur, along with any
additional tree protecfion measures.
The Project Arborisf shal! submit written reports fo fhe City Forester, af leasf, once every fwo weeks, as
he monifors the consfruction activifies and progress. These reports should include any changes that
occurred to the TPZ as well as fhe condition and location of fhe tree profecfion fencing. !f the amount of
TPZ was reduced then the Project Arborist shall jusfify why the fenc�ng was moved, and sha!!certify that
the construction activities to the trees did not adversely rmpact fhe overall and long-term health and
stability of the tree(s). If the rep orts are not submitted or received by fhe City Forester at the scheduled
intervals, and rf it appears the TPZ's or the Tree Profection Plan is not being followed by the contracfor,
the City will stop work on the project until an insp ection can be done by the City Forester and the Project
Arborist. This inspecfion wil! be to evaluate fhe tree protecfion fencing, determine rf the fencing was
moved at any poinf during construction, and defermine rf any part of fhe Tree Protection Plan has been
violated. If a vrolation has occurred, one or more of the following penalties will be pursued fhrough the
infraction process.
Notwithstanding any other provision of fhis fitle, any party found to be in violation of this chapter pursuanf
to Chapter 1.16 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall be subject to a civi!penalty of up to $500 and shall be
required to remedy any damage caused by the violation. Such remedration shall include, but not be
limrted to, the following:
A. Replacement of unlawfully removed or damaged trees in accordance with Section 18.790.060 (D)
of the Tigard Development Code; and
8. Payment of an additional civil penalty representing the estimated value of any unlawfully removed
or damaged tree, as determined using the most current Internafional Soc�ety of Arboriculture's
Guide for Plant Appraisal.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the Project Arborist shall submit a final certi�cation indicating the
elements of the Tree Protect�on Plan were followed and that all remaining trees on the site are healthy,
stable and viable in their modified growing environment.
Section 18.790.040 states that any tree preserved or retained in accordance with this section may
thereafter be removed only for the reasons set out in a tree plan, in accordance with Section
18.790.030, or as a condition of approval for a conditional use, and shall not be subject to
removal under any other section of this chapter. The property owner shall record a deed
restriction as a condition of approval of any development permit affected by this section to the
effect that such tree may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified
arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in
accordance with this section should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. The form of
this deed restriction shall be subject to approval by the Director.
The applicant will be required as a condition of approval to record a deed restriction limiting the removal
of trees that are retained on the project site following completion of the partition improvements, in
accordance with this standard.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Tree Removal standards are not presently met but the
proposal can be made to comply, by the imposition of the following conditions:
CONDITIONS:
. Revise the tree/mitigation plan to address removal and mitigation of the two trees
marked on the plan as "remove trees at builder's discretion."
. Prior to any site work, the applicant shall submit a final Tree Protection Plan that
follows the recommendations of the City Forester, as outlined under the discussion
of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal, in this decision.
. Record deed restrictions limiting the removal of trees that are to be retained on the
project site following completion of the partition improvements.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 11 OF 17
. Prior to issuance of building permits the Project Arborist shall submit to the City
Forester a final report describing how the Tree Protection Plan was implemented
and detailing any failures to comply with the Tree Protection Plan. The report shall
also describe the health of all remaining trees on the site, with details provided as to
any tree that has had its root system disturbed or that has otherwise been
damaged.
Visual Clearance Areas 18.7951:
TFis ap er requires a a c ear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property
adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private
driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or
temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that
obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight
(8) feet in height. Trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8)
feet are removed. A visuaf clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring from ti�e
corner, 30-feet along the right of way and along the driveway and connecting these two points
with a straight line.
According to the applicant, future landscaping will be consistent with this section. The corner of Fonner
and Fonner will not see additional landscaping or fencing that would impact the visual clearance areas.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Visual Clearance standards have been met.
PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS
Street And Utilitv Improvements Standards (Section 18.810�
L ap er . proviaes cons ruc ion s an ar s or f�implementation of public and private
facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are
addressed below:
Streets:
Improvements:
Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be
improved in accordance with the TDC standards.
Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion
of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC.
Minimum Rights-of-Wa and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a Nei hborhood
Route to have a 54 ri h�of-way width and 32-foot paved section. Other improvemen�s required
may include on-stree� parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting,
storm drainage, and street trees.
This site lies adjacent to SW Fonner Street, which is classified as a Neighborhood Route on the City of
Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 20 feet of right-of-way (ROW) from
centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate the
additional ROW needed to provide for 27 feet from centerline.
SW Fonner Street is currently partially improved. In order to mitigate the impact from this development,
the applicant should enter into a restrictive covenant for future street improvements.
Future Street Plan and Extension of Streets: Section 18.810.030.F states that a future street plan
shall be filed which shows the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the
boundaries of the proposed land division. This section also states that where it is necessary to
give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to
the boundary lines of the tract to be developed and a barricade shall be constructed at the end of
the street. These street stubs to adjoining properties are not considered to be cul-de-sacs since
they are intended to continue as through streets at such time as the adjoining property is
developed. A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the property owners
which shall not be removed until authorized by the City Engineer, the cost of which shall be
included in the street construction cost. Temporary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de-
sac bulbs shall be constructed for stub streets in excess of 150 feet in length.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 12 OF 17
The applicant has indicated that there are no opportunities for future streets due to existing
development. Staff concurs.
Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be
designed with due re ard to providing adequate buifding sites for the use contem��lated
consideration of needs�or convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street trafFic ana
recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography.
Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall
not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of-way line except:
. Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of
water or, pre-�xistin development or;
• For blocks adjacen� to arterial streets, limited access highways, major collectors or
railroads.
. For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access.
No blocks will be formed with the proposed partition. Therefore, this standard does not apply.
Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements
or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is not possible. Spacing between
connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or
topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards
in the code.
As mentioned above, no blocks will be formed with this application. Therefore, this standard does not
apply.
Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times
the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the
applicable zoning district.
Parcel #2 has a lot width of 61 feet. The depth of parcel #2 is approximately 164 feet. All three
proposed parcels are less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size. Therefore, this standard has been
satisfied.
Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public
or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies,
which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide
recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit,
the frontage shall be at least 15 feet.
The smallest of the three parcels has approximately 61 feet of frontage. None of the proposed lots are
considered flag lots. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied.
Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design
standards and be located �n both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private
streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side.
The applicant will enter into a restrictive covenant for future half-street improvements that includes
construction of sidewalks.
Sanitary Sewers:
Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each
new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the
provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water
Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or
amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan.
Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include
consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive
Plan.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 13 OF 17
There is an existing 8-inch sewer in Fonner Street. The applicant's plan indicates that each parcel will
be provided with a sewer lateral connecting to the main line in Fonner Street.
Storm Drainage:
General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for
storm water and flood water runoff.
Accommodation of U pstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other
drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runofF from its entire upstream
drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the
necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for
Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and
including any future revisions or amendments).
There are no upstream drainage ways that impact this site.
Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the
City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing
draina�e facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until
provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have
been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the
Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by
Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments).
In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno
Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local
governments institute a sformwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no
net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments
resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the
development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the
storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention.
Developments of this small size, especially residential land partitions, are not required to provide on-site
detention. The applicant will be required to pay the water quantity SDC upon application for the building
permit for the two new parcels.
All proposed development within the City shall be desi�ned such that storm water runoff is conveyed to
an approved public drainage system. There is an existing storm line in the north-south leg of Fonner
Street and a lateral from Lot 2 will connect to this system. There is an existing ditch located along the
frontage of the east-west leg of Fonner. Lots 1 and 3 will have laterals for drainage that connects to this
ditch. The applicant will have to provide storm drainage plans showing the improvements in the ROW,
including cleaning and regrading the ditch (as needed to ensure capacity for the discharge from Lots 1
and 3) and installing a culvert across the proposed driveway for Lot 3.
Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways:
Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed
bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for
the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way.
SW Fonner Street is not designated a bicycle facility.
Utilities:
Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric,
communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed
underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surFace mounted connection boxes and
meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during
construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and:
• The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide
the underground services;
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2�04-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 14 OF 17
. The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities;
. All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets
by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and
. Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street
improvements when service connections are made.
Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall
pay a fee in-lieu of under-�rounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a
street where existing utilities whicli are not underground will serve the development and the
approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-g rounding the
utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The
determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only: such
situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the
placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An
applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which
are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of
under-grounding.
There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW Fonner Street. If the fee in-lieu is
proposed, it is equal to $35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The
frontage along this site is 191 lineal feet; therefore the fee woufd be $6,685.00.
ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT
Public Water S stem:
e i y o igar provides public water service in this area. The applicant has shown the installation of
two, 1-inch meters for the new lots.
Storm Water Qualit :
e ity as agree to enforce SurFace Water Management (SWM) regulations established by
Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and
Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities
shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm
water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan
shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility
maintained through the year.
The CWS standards include a provision that would exclude small projects such as residential land
partitions. It would be impractical to require an on-site water quality facility to accommodate treatment of
the storm water from the two new parcels. Rather, the CWS standards provide that applicants should
pay a fee in-lieu of constructing a facility, if deemed appropriate. The applicant shall pay the fee in-lieu
for this application.
Gradin and Erosion Control:
esign an onstruction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of
sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting
from development, const�uction, grading, excavating, clearin�, and any other activity whicFi
accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control
plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits.
The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb one or more acre
of land. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES
permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or
building permit.
Address Assi nments:
e i y o igar is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within
the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $50.00 per address shall be
assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to final plat approval.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 15 OF 17
Surve Re uirements:
e app ican s ina p at shall contain State Plane Coordinates [NAD 83 (91)] on two monuments with a
tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network (GC 22). These monuments
shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat
boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground
measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be
established by:
. GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey.
. By random traverse using conventional surveying methods.
In addition, the applicant's as-built drawings shall be tied to the GPS network. The applicant's engineer
shall provide the City with an electronic file with points for each structure (manholes, catch basins, water
valves, hydrants and other water system features in the development, and their respective X and Y
State Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD 83 (91�.
Impact Stud 18.390
ec io���states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the
following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:"
Section 18.390.040 states that the a��licant shall provide an impact study to quantify the
effect of development vn public facilities and services. For each public facility system and
type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet Cit� standard, and to
minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and
affected private property users.
In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property
interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for �ublic right-of-way
dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly
proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a
condition of ap�roval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the
approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real
property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will
have on the public.
The applicant has submitted an impact study. Any required street im rovements to certain collector or
higher volume streets and the Washington County Traffic Impact Fee �TIF) are mitigation measures that
are required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David
Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of
the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. The total TIF for a
single-family dwelling is $2,530 per unit.
Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on major street improvements
citywide, the TIF fee is $5,060 ($2,530 times two new units). Based on the estimate that total TIF fees
cover 32 percent of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100
percent of this proJ'ects traffic impact is $15,812 ($5,060 divided by .32). Given that the estimated cost of
the dedication and half-street improvements is $13,939 the value of these improvements is less than the
value of the unmiti�ated impacts. The difference between the TIF paid, and the full impact, is
considered the unmitigated impact on the street system $9,617 ($15,812 -$13,939 = $9,617). The
exactions are proportionate.
SECTION VI. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS
. City of Tigard Public Works Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it.
City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 16 OF 17
SECTION VII. AGENCY COMMENTS
Qwest Communications Engineering Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections
to it.
SECTION VIII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION
Notice: Notice was mailed to:
X The applicant and owners
�— Owner of record within the required distance
� Affected government agencies
Final Decision:
THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JULY 20, 2004 AND BECOMES
EFFECTIVE ON AUGUST 4, 2004 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED.
A��eal:
The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are
otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may
appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Communit�r Development
Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director
within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule
and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard,
Oregon 97223.
Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be
confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the
comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may
be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, sub�ect to any additional rules of procedure that
may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body.
THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON AUGUST 3, 2004.
Questions:
yoTf�ave any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW
Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171.
i f �� Jul 20 2004
e c e g
' Associate Plan er
Jul 20 2004
. ic ar ewers o
Planning Manager
i:\curpinUnathew\MLP�rnIp2004-00004 decision.doc
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2004-00004 GERTZ PARTITION PAGE 17 OF 17
-� i � - .
. . .
I I ' - T ' GEOGHAVHIC INFONMPiI(]N SY51lM
- � --- J � � ' nCINITY M�
� ;�,
,� -
� � � wA
, �
,
� - - - - - - - -
�! , � � � - _ � � - - - - - - - -
, , � �
��i �� � __
�, ;� _ 'W��N�� �,s-� ��� _;�,� - '��,�; - � � MLP2004-00004
�
� —� ��SW BAMBI LN -- � �� �
i � ' � � � � � � � �
-1 ��'I --IQ --� II � � � � � � � � I
� -- J
i�� ; ��� _ _�_- � � � GE RTZ PARTITI ON �
- �a� r- ¢ - -� — -----_ � - -�
� r
� i
� � -� � N �
� ��
� I� � ,I -I�I - I I�� - -- J�`_I �
SW ERfnOL ST I i 1 �-
I - � _ I--- {
_1 � 1e- I
I I
� _ _ � , k__ , ;
� � �
_ ��_ , ,��
r � i �
- ---� � '- _���
i %
' � -�1�- I � : ,r
� '�.� --�.����.
-- ! i � � � - � � , ��I "�
ST _ 1 i�i i 1 �
- , CARME�V ,
� i , I � � u _��
�a i � ��—� a
\� � --.� � ����,
- �
��� G
� l_— ,, < ,
� ifn i � `��_, v_ � :y�� �i�`.�� �) �
r �...
I
� ��' �
— � ._i__�,eui�n,k � i.a. i � �'I
�
,� /; . . .o . er`9"_. �,�rvitn �o
-= -- - , i.. . ..,.._ � �)
..
I Na ao/
�ELFPt t__�S??-LLM1 ��1
_ `�j ''
- ��_N �;�S�TE ���' �" � :`�;
, �_,,.-.`_ `��,�;� _ _ � Tpard Area Map � � '
__ � �� i
U � , /I • �
, �� ��� �v - ,�,?� !- �
3. � �
� � ��� ,
I FONNER . � � I o ,oa 2ao �0 40o F�� �
�
� , I ��� , .�. 1"=313feet
� ���, � -- - i---
� � ��N CT_,-
���
_ ' (J��-� � ` -�� � Cih ut figard
� � ����-yyy�.�� --- �`���� . . . . -- � � --�- . � � ,- _-�.._ , In(ormaUOo on this map is la general location only and �I
l � �� - . - - � � �I should be venfied wiN ttie Developrtienl Services Divisim_
�
\ _� � � `1 ,i 13125 SW Hall Blvd
/
, � ' � Tigard OR 97723
S�1 .��`� A �� ��__ �'� (W3 6394171 �
� �� � http:/M�w.v,citigard.a.us
� � �� /, \ \ � �� / � .e-��
Community Development Plot date:Jun 2,2004;C:lmagiclMAGIC03.APR
. ___ _ !�;
� & a �
,
�} 5.11. FONNER ST.�� ; o ,,; -
� W _ _-- -- -
z � — -_
- ` -- • N 8 a_ +;.
, - .{i --� � 23
_.-_.
�_
; S X : o - -
: w � EP - � _
I � EP— --_ �-_ _ _ � _24" DI—�— -�
� —W— — — —— — �4- — — — -W- —6.. CF--'.— �-N� =�-
� � — —Vl�— —6" CI- ---�_'--_--'---�------"— _J.J
,� � � --�---�--'�- � -- .-- _--- --- �. ---_
-- —72.11'I �
, , I 50.49' -1—
; � /� i
i � �
6$/' I I PROPOSED ROW DEDICAT10N
�o•�o
�� ���. �
� Exisnrrc ��'1 � v � �
R�II � , � , � ,
, �------------------- �
� � � �
,
EP TO I ' r 'ol -� � � �------------� �
� i � � i
' � i
20.00' �� 27.00' I I � i I
U 1 / ', EX.WO00 I � , 1
PROPOSEO Ro � uc�� I ; �
� = I � ~I ' �
� `°, � / - ,-�..B.aBa sF. , 3 �
. I . ' � � i� � '.Q mi i 9.065 SF i �
a i � � i
n
3 z � I t�! II� � ��� � � ' �
! H
�z . . -,s, , � � ,- �
' M1 33.7' E%ISTNJG RESIDENCE I I^I
� LOL �I I I i TO RFAWN __-_ I u'1
, �; I I � �. I _ . EY, N�N�
L � ; ^�
� ,
, ,
. � .
I � , . , . , 39.0'� , ��. I `�` t 1
. , , .—'_ _ "' "� ♦
1 I
• � .�.:�.:�. � �` I
� I , L —__—__ ,
� � �r.s�— — — � �
. � � � � �r , . .. - ..� ,;�s"�� � � i
I I ' ; � r �h _;� -- --- -- \ ' I
� I r i �
I i �\ i i
II �
� 9 �
i � � �� �
� cp i
,;, � � i `(' `� i
'c --._ ._._ ..._ .�N-I_,;I. I I i �� �
� � � �
� Z
' � ; �,�is sF ,
, ,\
� � � � '
, I
,
� �
,
, ,
� , � ��
� ; , , ,
� �.o� �-----------------------------------------------='�• �, ,
,;�,
----------------�r�s.na-------------------�
PROPOSED ROW DEDICATION
�„�a�p CITY oF Ti�ARD � MLP2004-00004
SITE PLAN N
GERTZ PARTITION
Ma is not to scale
Kenneth E. Gertz EXHtBtT�
Gertz Construction, Inc. MLP2004-00004
19200 SW 46th Avenue GERTZ PARTITION
Tualatin, OR 97062
James and Andrea O'Reilly
11533 SW Elton Court
Tigard, OR 97223
Russ and Tena Oehler
12972 SW 113�h Place
Tigard, OR 97223
� .
. �
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITYOFTIGARD
Comraunity�Uevelapinent
,SFwpingA Bettes�ommunity
I, �PatriciaG. Lu d, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a SeniorAdministrativeSpecraGstfor
the City of 7'rgar�asFiington County, Oregon and that I served the following:
{Check Appropnate Box(s)Below}
❑x NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: MLP2004-00004/GERT1 PARTITION
❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference)
� City of Tigard Planning Director
A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Ellhiblt"A",and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to
each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B",and by reference made a part
hereof, on 10h120,2004,and deposited in the United States Mail on lllhl 20,2004,postage prepaid.
, _ � �
l�'G�C��° • r 2 l'7
(Perso t t Prepared ice)
S7,A2E O�F O�C�OX
�' ty of�lx�gtoa ss
o��I�g �
Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the _� day of , 2004.
OFFICIAL SEAL �—����y��
5UE ROSS
NOTARY PUBUC-0REGON
COMMISSlON N0.375152
MY COMMIS510N IXPIRES DEC.1,2007 A�l�7
My mission Expires: ' a��—v �
.�
�;
NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION
MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2004-00004 � �
CITY OF TIGARD
GERTZ PARTITION c'�»>mun=��flez�ec�pm�,�t
S(apingA�etter�'ommumty
DAY =
SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY
FILE NAME: GERTZ PARTITION
CASE NO: Minor Land Partition (MLP) MLP2004-00004
PROPOSAL: A request for approval of a three (3) lot Minor Land Partition of .63 acres. Parcel
one has an existing home on site. Parcels two and three will be developed with
single-family residences. The lot sizes for this development would be 8,088,
7,715, and 9,065 square feet respectively.
APPLICANT: Kenneth E. Gertz OWNER: Same
Gertz Construction, Inc.
19200 SW 46th Avenue
Tualatin, OR 97062
ZONING
DESIGNATION: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to
accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory
residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and
attached single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and
institutional uses are also permitted conditionally.
LOCATION: 11480 SW Fonner Street; WCTM 2S103AC, Tax Lot 2300.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390 (Decision-Making Procedures);
18.420 (Land Partitions}; 18.510 (Residential Zoning Districts); 18.705 (Access
Egress and Circulation); 18.715 (Density Computations); 18.745 (Landscaping and
Screening); 18.765 (Off-Street parking and Loading Requirements); 18.790 (Tree
Removal); 18.795 (Visual Clearance Areas); and 18.810 (Street and Utility
Improvement Standards).
SECTION II. DECISION
Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has
APPROVED the above request. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted
in the full decision, available at City Hall.
THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS
FF�L'r�►� ���� �F����!\!E GATE ^F T�l� a�Cl�lO�.
All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or
copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25�) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the
time of the request.
SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION
Notice:
oT�tice mailed to:
X The applicant and owners
�— Owner of record within the required distance
� Affected government agencies
Final Decision:
THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JULY 20, 2004 AND BECOMES
EFFECTIVE ON AUGUST 4, 2004 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED.
Appeal:
The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are
otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may
appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community
Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed
with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The
appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW
Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223.
Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be
confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the
comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may
be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that
may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body.
THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON AUGUST 3, 2004.
Questions:
For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Mathew Scheidegger at
(503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223.
��_ _ -- 1� ��-1 ���� J����'.l`I—I �� naM�nr w�w
� � � ��l
�� I �� �II �' �__I��—�- ` , - I �i � j =_______
�
--- � �-_� ���;s�uT-� � � i- � !_j,, ,� -- , � MLP2004-00004
��.� T-- j �sv:e -- �- -���---�L � ________
i I � F-- T.,.�x�„ t--a� ` _ Q i i
��� � ��a --� �'; 1 �f-_-I ; GERTZ PARTITION
- r� _ k ��'�_-1--_�
p___.
I SWER� � I r'___�. I _ '",__—
1 �T
� -r_a �- � �
- -��- _ �_�'� �--�- -
_ �T � T ; �� i_ '�,
� � _� - - - _, ' '��_ �
�-�--`� � -r- � ��
. CARMEN ST�� - •` r�:
--� � i li � � ' T -I--� � I--�� � � - •� ,� . t ` �
� �-� -- �- _�_ �-- ' �' � � -�I � �_ ���
�
- - F- � -� li _i_�---"- 1 ��� ��_w .����
��--�-' _ � - -- ��� -_ ��� �. ��
;'� i ;- -i � �"`��'4% �
- -J -� I
- - - �.
I - �� ~ �'-�-_� U �
�
;
-� - -�- � � _ ��
-r" K -7—� .
_ �_fi i __�--� � I �_._ _�� - �J I_-. N
�� y
i �_�, �7-� �' �y•
� _'__
� i
i
I �, ; �. , �'i
' __ : � � ' .___.�1
_
� � i I f_ �i
i
__'1' .;�-i��
�_ ---le�ae�- __ �--- � -- .,,M ~ �I
�__ ; , , � � i�
_� _�-� ,�-_�— ��(���'i �-
�---,�--' --- -- — �1 �-I..y � "� �
. � — f11� � /y ��ryo�TiBa�d
— _ �� �-�J � .iw .x. o-.a
I
- -+--��� _ �,1� �.�.�M�...��
� �
� ,�-� ,.,�m
,---4-�� , _ -:�� -�"�' ��.�
' t� 4
� C� , . ,_ � �.,.....,�,�
- -
_-'�' - --
� S.If. FONNER ST.I ��� . _ -. . ._.._- . __._-;.-._.
-� �-- --,.—i- - ,- - -• �----
� � �-�.��-g -=_-_`___-- -,,,,,j-�_.. __
I i � ; ��-- -�w ---� ��
i�,:��" . �.�..�
�
I ,I
r
- ' �
� � , ,
. , ,
i , � --------------•
� , � � I
o,a , / „, �
, �------------ ,
' �� I � I I
��o � . , �
. e z �I I�I � �^�en s di i a.na s � �
�z - i r�;
1R I �Ij`4 � ' 9 1 ,ie;�.� �I � �
N �,I�"_" '—1[T" ,
I��I �....... ..,.-..�......_....,�'��
' ....� .................�..a...-.0
-� �, � � � .o..r
.
I,I, . �• I
. .; I I I----------•-•-------------�, .� `'�'.
. _ -- Y�� j >.;s � � I
� I I \,\ I
, � , .
, , , . ,
� „ , . .
�-------- ------ --------------------------------= . ,
' ----------------��-------------------�
Pa�a�o ao.��.�..
,,� (�TY OF T16ARD 1 MLP2004-00004
��P� N GERTZ PARTITION
la nM to cule
. ' .
ROGERS SHERRI L BRYANT TY D&NICOLE L EXHIBIT �
11230 SW FONNER ST 11565 SW FONNER ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 �
'103AC-08 0 2 036D-10700
200 - ARTITION PLAT BR T 8 NICOLE L
OW RS LOT 2 1156 FONNER ST
, p ARD,O 97223
2S103DB-09400 2S103AC-07900
ABEYTA THOMAS J AND DEBORAH L BURGESS FAMILY TRUST
11370 SW ERSTE DR 32399 SW LAKE DR
TIGARD,OR 97223 WILSONVILLE,OR 97070
2S103BD-09800 2S103AC-06200
BACH KRISTA BURGESS JAMES F&MARY B
12945 SW 116TH PL 11350 SW FONNER ST
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1036D-04300 2S103AC-05500
BALDWIN JAMES RONALD JR BURK RICK R
11675 SW FONNER 12687 SW 113TH PL
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103BD-05800 2S103AG04000
BAZZEL JESSIE R 8 ALICIA L BURNS FAMILY TRUST
12727 SW 116TH AVE 12590 SW 114TH TER
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103AC-06700 2S103BD-05900
BILODEAU DOUGLAS J& CARGILE CHRISOPHER&GINA
NICOLE S 12720 SW 116TH AVE
12899 SW 113TH PL TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
2 3AC-06 0 2S103AC-08100
BLAZ OMES INC CARNAGEY ROBERT
11389 SW FONNER ST
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1036D-07600 2S103D6-09300
BOECK MARK G 8�CATHERINE L CLARKE JOHN G 8�KARYN S
12621 SW 115TH AVE 11380 SW ERSTE PL
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103CA-00208 2S103AC-05300
BOYTE HOWARD AND MARILYN CONNELL JAMES JESSE
11560 SW FONNER 12731 SW 113TH PL
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
� _ . . .. �. �.�., ,... .. , ._.
2S10306-09600 2S103AC-05000
� CULBERTSON JON C FRANK CRAIG E&LORI A
11385 SW ERSTE PL 12797 SW 113TH PL
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1038D-09100 2S103D6-09900
DAVE AMATO 8 ASSOC LTD FRANK LARRY AND ANGELA
PO BOX 19576 11480 SW SONNE PLACE
PORTLAND,OR 97280 TIGARD,OR 97223
25103AC-a4100 2S103BD-06200
DURFEE MICHAEL D AND GENIUCH RONALD W 8 EDITH M
BUTTERFIELD MELISSA 12664 SW 116TH AVE
12612 SW 114TH TERR TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103CA-00100 25103AC-02300
EDWARDS WILLIAM M GERTZ KENNETH E
PAULINE M 19200 SW 46TH AVE
13105 SW 115TH TUALATIN,OR 97062
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S703AC-00600 2S103AC-02600
EMME LARRY M GIANOLA JEFFREY W&SHANNON L
11221 SW FONNER ST 11550 SW FONNER ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1036D-08900 2S103AC-04300
FENTON JASON R GOETZ JEANNE
12996 SW 116TH PL 12758 SW 114TH TERRACE
PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103AC-02400 2S103AC-07000
FILLER DAVID E&MARY C GOHIER PATRICIA LYNN/PIERRE
11500 SW FONNER ST 12955 SW 113TH PL
PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103AC-01401 2S103AC-06400
FLEMING DAVID L GRECO LEONARD R
11227 SW FONNER 8151 SIMMS SL
TIGARD,OR 97223 ARVADA,CO 800D5
2S103AC-02200 2S103AC-07800
FONNER LLC GRECO LEONARD R
BY TRACY ANN BEAN 11441 SW FONNER ST
2744 SW SCHOLLS FERRY RD TIGARD,OR 97223
PORTLAND,OR 97221
2S103AC-06600 2S103AC-06300
FORDE CHARLES E& GRECO LEONARD R&JULIE M
ELAINE P 11441 SW FONNER ST
12855 SW 113TH PL TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103BD-D9200 2S1038D-04000
" HALL SHANNON KAWASAKI NOBUO SHARON LE
12990 SW 116TH AVE 5750 E HILLCREST DR
TIGARD,OR 97223 PORT ORCHARD,WA 98366
2S103BD-O6000 2S103BD-06400
HAYDEN DARRON R 8 WENDY KNAPPICH THOMAS R 8 CAROL A
12716 SW 116TH AVE 12626 SW 116TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 T�GARD,OR 97223
2S1036D-10100 2S103DB-10100
HEETER JO E 8 KNUTSON RICHARD AND JOYCE
SILL PAULINE R 11475 SW SONNE PLACE
11545 SW ELTON CT TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103AC-05400 2S103AG08000
HELLHAKE JIM KRAVCHENKO LIYA
12709 SW 113TH PL 8364 SW PFAFFLE#210
PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103BD-05500 2S103BD-05700
HERBST JAMES A 8 NANCY H KYRISS RICHARD B&CONSTANCE L
12679 SW 116TH AVE 12703 SW 116TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S103BD-06100 2S103AC-04200
HILDENBRAND RYAN P&JENNER L LIBERT SCOTT A AND CYNTHIA M
12712 SW 116TH AVE 12636 SW 114TH TERRACE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103AC-01400 2S703BD-10400
HOBBS RONALD E AND JUNE E MAHUNA TYSON 8�
7205 SW VENTURA DR MORRIS LESLIE ANN
TIGARD,OR 97223 12833 SW 116TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103CA-00209 2S103BD-10300
HOLMES JOAN M MCNULTY CORY/RACHEL
13050 SW HOWARD DR 12830 SW 116TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103D6-D95�0 2S103BD-05600
HONEYCUTT PROPERTIES LLC MIX KELLY C&WYNONA G
1205 SE GRAND AVE 12681 SW 116TH AVE
PORTLAND,OR 97214 TIGARD,OR 97223
103AC-059 25103AC-07500
HU L CREEK ESTATES NAVAS MARIANA
OWN F LOTS 3-6 12958 SW 113TH PL
, TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1036D-06300 2S1U3BD-09400
' NEWPORT DOUGLAS W 8 JANET M ROBINSON KATHRYN
12648 SW 116TH AVE 12985 SW 116TH PL
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
251038D-09500 2S103AC-01200
NGUYEN HUY N ROUSE DANIEL K
12973 SW 116TH PL 11385 SW FONNER ST
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103CA-00306 2S103DB-09700
NORSWORTHY HOLLY SCHOPPE PAUL&KATHRYN J
11660 SW FONNER STREET 11395 SW ERSTE PL
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1036D-09900 2S103AC-01700
NOTTINGHAM SCOTT P& SCHULTHEIS ERIC D 8
MARGARET E 11180 SW FONNER ST
11587 SW ELTON CT TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97224
2S103AC-01300 2S703AC-07300
OAK RICKY J 8 BARBARA T SCHWEITZ ERIC A 8
11245 SW FONNER ST MARTHA L
TIGARD,OR 97223 12980 SW 113TH PL
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103AC-07400 2S1038D-09600
OEHLER RUSSELL E 8 SCOTT MATTHEW C&
CATHERINE A LAURETTE l
12972 SW 113TH PL 12961 SW 116TH PL
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
257038D-10200 2S103AC-06800
O'REILLY JAMES/ANDREA SELLICK LEE A&ELIZABETH J
11533 SW ELTON CT 12911 SW 113TH PL
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103AC-07200 2S103AC-05600
PETROV JOHN M&MALISSA A SHIPLEY LANE A&LUCY A
12999 SW 113TH PL 12665 SW 113TH PL
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103AC-07100 2S103AC-06500
PHELAN THOMAS C SMITH GEOFFREY K 8
4504 GRANT ST JANEA
VANCOUVER,WA 98660 12801 5W 113TH PL
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103D6-00100 2S1038D-02300
POTTER ERIC R& SMITH ROSS JAY
DAMERON CHRISTINA M 11760 SW CARMEN ST
13030 SW 115TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103AC-05200 2S103BD-D9300
� SOB KRISHNA B TSAI JASON V 8 SANDRA THYDA
12753 SW 113TH PL 12991 SW 116TH PL
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103AC-07600 2S103AC-06900
STERNKOPF PETER V&TERI L TURNER STEVEN R 8 MARY JENA
12933 SW 113TH PL 12933 5W 113TH PL
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103AC-0770D 2S7036D-10000
STEWART PETER B&TRACY D VOORHEES DANIEL WISANDRA
12977 SW 113TH PL 11571 SW ELTON CT
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1038D-Q9000 2S103AC-05100
SZALVAY LASZLO S&ALISON J WINGEIER RICHARD CLAYTON&
12994 SW 116TH PL RACHEL ANN
TIGARD,OR 97223 12775 SW 113TH PL
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103AC-06100 25703CA-00207
THOMPSON JANET WOODLEY MICHAEL&CASSANDRA B
11340 SW FONNER ST 11590 SW FONNER
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S703BD-09700 2S103D8-10000
THOREN THEODORE J& YOUNG VANCE A
KIMBERLY J 11470 SW SONNE PL
12957 SW 116TH PL PORTLAND,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
2 103BD-�87 0
TIG ITY OF
131 LL
T ARD,OR 97223
3AC-0 0
TIGA ITY OF
131 SW LL
TI ARD,OR 97223
2 1036D-1 0
TIG ITY OF
1312 ALL
T ARD,OR 97223
2 03BD-10 �0
TIGA ITY OF
131 SW L
T ARD, OR 97223
Brooks Gaston
3206 Princess
Edinburg, TX 78539
Don & Dorothy Erdt
13760 SW 121st Avenue
Tigard, OR 97223
Ellen Beilstein
14630 SW 139th Avenue
Tigard, OR 97224
Martha Bishop
10590 SW Cook Lane
Tigard, OR 97223
Vanessa Foster
13085 SW Howard Drive
Tigard, OR 97223
Susan Beilke
11755 SW 114th Place
Tigard, OR 97223
CPO 4B
16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242
Tigard, OR 97224
Patricia Keerins
12195 SW 121 st Avenue
Tigard, OR 97223
John Frewing
7110 SW Lola Lane
Tigard, OR 97223
CITY OF TIGARD - fENTRAI CIT SUBCOMMITfEE �i:lcurpinlsetupllabels\CIT Central.doc) UPDATED: 18-May-04
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITYOFiIGARD
�'ornntunity�Devefapme�it
SfiapingA BetterCommunity
I, �Pat�tcia L. Lu�d, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a SeniorAdminirtrative SpeciaCrst for
the City of 7'sgar �GUasfiington County, Oregon and that I served the following:
{Check Appropnate Boz(s)Below}
❑x NOTICE OF PEN�IN6 LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: MLP2004-00004/GERTl PARTITION
� AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference)
� City of Tigard Planning Director
A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Elchlblt"A",and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to
each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked E)Ihlblt"B",and by reference made a part
hereof, on lune 3,2004,and deposited in the United States Mail on lune 3,2004, postage prepaid.
�c�2GG� • a7'�
(Person that repar N ce)
.Sxi�`�E OF��ON
Co�unt�of� i�egton u
oj��I" �
�
Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the�� day of ��i , 2004.
OFFICIAL SEAL
SUE ROSS
NOTARY PUBLJC-OREGON
COMMISSION N0.375152
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES DEC.1,2007
My Commission Expires: � o�� �� ��
�;::
.
� � EXHtBIT�
NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER:
THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER.
NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION �,TYO TICiARD
MINOR LAND PARTITION sh�p n���tD;:�omm'un1ty
DATE OF NOTICE: June 2, 2004
FILE NUMBER: MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2004-00004
FILE NAME: GERTZ PARTITION
PROPOSAL: A request for approval of a three (3) lot Minor Land Partition of .63 acres. Parcel one has an
existing home on site. Parcels two and three will be developed with single-family residences.
The lot sizes for this development would be 8,088, 7,715, and 9,065 square feet respectively.
ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to
accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at
a minimum Iot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are
permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally.
APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390,
18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
LOCATION: 11480 SW Fonner Street; WCTM 2S103AC, Tax Lot 2300.
YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS:
Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to
submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT
5:00 PM ON JUNE 17, 2D04. All comments should be directed to Mathew Scheideg,qer, Associate Planner in the
Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City
of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171 or by e-mail to matts c(�..ci.tiqard.or.us.
ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY Of TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED
ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS.
THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS
WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE
IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR JUI.Y 14, 2004. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A
COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED.
WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL
CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
. Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria
believed to be applicable to this proposal;
. Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to
provide a response;
. Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant
approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue.
�':
Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude
subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings
directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence.
AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE
DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN
500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE
ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED
UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH
CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION.
SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS:
. The application is accepted by the City
. Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a
14-day written comment period.
. The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies.
. City Staff issues a written decision.
. Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all
owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax
assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any
governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the
City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice.
INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW:
The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are
contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development
Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this
service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of
this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments."
� - - - _- --� =wA wa�r naP
�, ; ' � -- �
� � �!��� �_-���_ �� ' � _ � � MLP2004-00004
� �I � SWBMI�W _._..� ... ------__
� � ¢ ��r ', �'~ GERT1 PARTITION
L
�.� SW ER 7 �
� /�
/
� � ��
`!�
�" � ,
— - f/j-�
�. _� �
" � i � �---( ��"� l L. � �- -
�J-�— . �� � � '1�.�
�,��g�� ST % Spj. �
� I I i �—�----T_r— ` , ���,
� � � � ' �� � � �f �.:+
� . , J. � . - -I
, �\ ,..+: � I
r
� �r � �IT�� � - -�--�
,...Y..�., I
IV �
( N
I —y
I— I�T-.i rurvN I ,,� i _ . _ _ ..� �
>>.
��
I ��
�- �I� ,1 J � Ciry of�T{�vd
T—' ` ( .....r�..r.�. �vd
J.�
.--_ I � � �\.�� wrr,.�....��ro.b..o�� a.�.do.�
� �C . .—�\ \ \ �\ � ��� .
+.�=w. I
•2S103AC 01900 2S103BD-04401
ROGERS SHERRI L BRYANT TY D&NICOLE L EXHiBIT�
11230 SW FONNER ST 11565 SW FONNER ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
103AC-08 0 2 038D-10700
240 - ARTITION PLAT BR T &NICOLE L
OW RS LOT 2 115 FONNER ST
, 0 ARD,O 97223
2S103D6-09400 2S103AC-07900
ABEYTA THOMAS J AND DEBORAH L BURGESS FAMILY TRUST
11370 SW ERSTE DR 32399 SW LAKE DR
TIGARD,OR 97223 WI�SONVILLE,OR 97070
2S103BD-09800 2S103AC-06200
BACH KRISTA BURGESS JAMES F&MARY B
12945 SW 116TH PL 11350 SW FONNER ST
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103BD-�4300 2S103AC-055D0
BALDWIN JAMES RONALD JR BURK RICK R
11675 SW FONNER 12687 SW 113TH PL
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103BD-05800 2S103AC-04000
BAZZEL JESSIE R&ALICIA L BURNS FAMILY TRUST
12727 SW 116TH AVE 12590 SW 114TH TER
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103AC-06700 251038D-05900
BILODEAU DOUGLAS J& CARGILE CHRISOPHER&GINA
NICOLE S 12720 SW 116TH AVE
12899 SW 113TH PL TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
2 AC-06 0 2S703AC-08100
BLAZ OMES INC CARNAGEY ROBERT
11389 SW FONNER ST
TIGARD,OR 97223
251036D-07600 2S103DB-09300
BOECK MARK G 8 CATHERINE L CLARKE JOHN G&KARYN S
12621 SW 115TH AVE 11380 SW ERSTE PL
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
25103CA-00208 ZS103AC-05300
BOYTE HOWARD AND MARILYN CONNELL JAMES JESSE
11560 SW FONNER 12731 SW 113TH PL
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
. 'r
2S103D8-09600 2S103AC-05000
� CULBERTSON JON C FRANK CRAIG E&LORI A
11385 SW ERSTE PL 12797 SW 113TH PL
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S 103 BD-09100 2S103D8-09900
DAVE AMATO&ASSOC LTD FRANK LARRY AND ANGELA
PO BOX 19576 11480 SW SONNE PLACE
PORTLAND,OR 97280 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103AC-04100 2S103BD-062Q0
DURFEE MICHAEL D AND GENIUCH RONALD W 8 EDITH M
BUTTERFIELD MELISSA 12664 SW 116TH AVE
12612 SW 114TH TERR TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103CA-00100 2S103AC-0230D
EDWARDS WILLIAM M GERTZ KENNETH E
PAULINE M 19200 SW 46TH AVE
13105 5W 115TH TUALATIN,OR 97062
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103AC-00600 2S103AC-02600
EMME LARRY M GIANOIA JEFFREY W&SHANNON L
11221 SW FONNER ST 11550 SW FONNER ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1036D-08900 2S103AC-04300
FENTON JASON R GOETZ JEANNE
12996 SW 116TH PL 12758 SW 114TH TERRACE
PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103AC-02400 2S103AC-07000
FILLER DAVID E 8 MARY C GOHIER PATRICIA LYNN/PIERRE
11500 SW FONNER ST 12955 SW 113TH PL
PORTLAND, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103AC-01401 2S103/1C-06400
FLEMING DAVID L GRECO LEONARD R
11227 SW FONNER 8151 SIMMS SL
TIGARD,OR 97223 ARVADA,CO 80005
2S103AC-02200 2S103AC-07800
FONNER LLC GRECO LEONARD R
BY TRACY ANN BEAN 11441 SW FONNER ST
2744 SW SCHOLLS FERRY RD TIGARD,OR 97223
PORTLAND,OR 97221
2S103AC-06600 2S103AC-06300
FORDE CHARLES E& GRECO LEONARD R 8 JULIE M
ELAINE P 11441 SW FONNER ST
12855 SW 113TH PL TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
. .
2S103BD-09200 2S1036D-04000
' HALL SHANNON KAWASAKI NOBUO SHARON LE
12990 SW 116TH AVE 5750 E HILLCREST DR
TIGARD,OR 97223 PORT ORCHARD,WA 98366
2S103BD-O6DOD 2S103BD-06400
HAYDEN DARRON R&WENDY KNAPPICH THOMAS R 8 CAROL A
12716 SW 116TH AVE 12626 5W 116TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103BD-10100 2S103DB-10100
HEETER JO E& KNUTSON RICHARD AND JOYCE
SILL PAULINE R 11475 SW SONNE PLACE
11545 SW ELTON CT TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103AC-05400 2S103AC-08000
HELLHAKE JIM KRAVCHENKO LIYA
12709 SW 113TH PL 8364 SW PFAFFLE#210
PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1036D-05500 2S103BD-05700
HERBST JAMES A&NANCY H KYRISS RICHARD B&CONSTANCE L
12679 SW 116TH AVE 12703 SW 116TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S103BD-06100 2S103AC-04200
HILDENBRAND RYAN P 8�JENNER L LIBERT SCOTT A AND CYNTHIA M
12712 SW 116TH AVE 12636 SW 114TH TERRACE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103AC-01400 2S103BD-10400
HOBBS RONA�D E AND JUNE E MAHUNA TYSON 8
7205 SW VENTURA DR MORRIS LESLIE ANN
TIGARD, OR 97223 12833 SW 116TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103CA-00209 2S1036D-10300
HOLMES JOAN M MCNULTY CORY/RACHEL
13050 SW HOWARD DR 12830 SW 116TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S703DB-09500 2S103BD-05600
HONEYCUTT PROPERTIES LLC MIX KELLY C&WYNONA G
1205 SE GRAND AVE 12681 SW 116TH AVE
PORTLAND,OR 97214 TIGARD,OR 97223
103AC-059 2S103AC-07500
HU L CREEK ESTATES NAVAS MARIANA
OWN F LOTS 3-6 12958 SW 113TH PL
, TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1038D-06300 2S103BD-09400
' NEWPORT DOUGLAS W 8 JANET M ROBINSON KATHRYN
12648 SW 116TH AVE 12985 SW 116TH PL
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1036D-09500 2S103AC-01200
NGUYEN HUY N ROUSE DANIEL K
12973 SW 116TH PL 11385 SW FONNER ST
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103CA-00306 2S103D6-09700
NORSWORTHY HOLLY SCHOPPE PAUL&KATHRYN J
11660 SW FONNER STREET 11395 SW ERSTE PL
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S703BD-09900 2S103AC-01700
NOTTINGHAM SCOTT P& SCHULTHEIS ERiC D 8
MARGARET E 11180 SW FONNER ST
11587 5W ELTON CT TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97224
2S103AC-01300 2S103AC-07300
OAK RICKY J 8 BARBARA T SCHWEITZ ERIC A 8
11245 SW FONNER ST MARTHA L
TIGARD,OR 97223 12980 SW 113TH PL
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103AC-07400 251038D-09600
OEHLER RUSSELL E& SCOTT MATTHEW C 8
CATHERINE A LAURETTE L
12972 SW 113TH PL 12961 SW 116TH PL
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1036D-10200 2S103AC-06800
O'REILLY JAMES/ANDREA SELLICK LEE A 8 EIIZABETH J
11533 SW ELTON CT 12911 SW 113TH PL
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
zs�osnc-o�zoo 2s�osnc-ossoo
PETROV JOHN M 8 MALISSA A SHIPLEY LANE A&LUCY A
12999 SW 113TH PL 12665 SW 113TH PL
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103AC-01100 2S103AC-06500
PHELAN THOMAS C SMITH GEOFFREY K 8
4504 GRANT ST JANEA
VANCOUVER,WA 98660 12801 SW 113TH PL
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103DB-00100 2S1036D-02300
POTTER ERIC R& SMITH ROSS JAY
DAMERON CHRISTINA M 11760 SW CARMEN ST
13030 SW 115TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1D3AC-05200 2S103BD-09300
' SOB KRISHNA B TSAI JASON V&SANDRA THYDA
12753 SW 113TH PL 12991 SW 116TH PL
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S703AC-07600 2S103AC-06900
STERNKOPF PETER V&TERI L TURNER STEVEN R&MARY JENA
12933 SW 113TH PL 12933 SW 113TH PL
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103AC-07100 2S103BD-100D0
STEWART PETER B&TRACY D VOORHEES DANIEL W/SANDRA
12977 SW 113TH PL 11571 SW ELTON CT
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103BD-Q9000 2S1D3AC-05100
SZALVAY LASZLO S 8 ALI50N J WINGEIER RICHARD CLAYTON 8
12994 SW 116TH PL RACHELANN
TIGARD,OR 97223 12775 SW 113TH PL
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103AC-06100 2S103CA-00207
THOMPSON JANET WOODLEY MICHAEL 8 CASSANDRA B
11340 SW FONNER ST 11590 SW FONNER
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S703BD-09700 2S103DB-10000
THOREN THEODORE J 8 YOUNG VANCE A
KIMBERLY J 11470 SW SONNE PL
12957 SW 116TH PL PORTLAND,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
2 1036D-087 0
TIG ITY OF
131 LL
T ARD,OR 97223
3AC-0 0
TIGA ITY OF
131 SW LL
TI ARD,OR 97223
z �osBO-�o 0
TIGA ITY OF
1312 ALL
T ARD,OR 97223
2 oseo-�o "o
TIGA ITY OF
131 SW L
T ARD,OR 97223
. 1 •
Brooks Gaston
3206 Princess
Edinburg, TX 78539
Don & Dorothy Erdt
13760 SW 121 st Avenue
Tigard, OR 97223
Ellen Beilstein
14630 SW 139th Avenue
Tigard, OR 97224
Martha Bishop
10590 SW Cook Lane
Tigard, OR 97223
Vanessa Foster
13085 SW Howard Drive
Tigard, OR 97223
Susan Beilke
11755 SW 114th Place
Tigard, OR 97223
CPO 4B
16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242
Tigard, OR 97224
Patricia Keerins
12195 SW 121 st Avenue
Tigard, OR 97223
John Frewing
7110 SW Lola Lane
Tigard, OR 97223
CITY OF TIGARD - CENTRAL (IT SUB[OMMITTEE (i:lcurpinlsetupllabelslClT Central.doc) UPDATED: 18-May-04
- i r--�,�i - � �-� � �
I�—yI I N . • - .
I N�--� ct -- �
� I I � �- !�� I GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM
SW ERROL ST f-- F=- — e-,_ - AREA N�IFI�
� , � , - �
`� ' � �5�')
_ � --� , ��_, �
r y.1 , � —!
'� ,-�
� E-- � �, ��,�.��. ,\
_ ° cn '�„��au� m�,�� , � --
._ .r�, tt1q��1 . � Ti1WCNlN � . i \ I . i ����������� �
' mamww � ,mwc�uu I � Y �
� i ��_�____��
� _ meucaou � -I
_l ` � �
,__ �,p,,.u.. n,��.sN� � �,��,a°a �_-_ FOR: Matt Sprague ��
, �
mneoossoe � � � +
_ mweowu 7 ._ esia�e�ssea �� ,
sin�eowa
�-
J \ mp�oose�a mo�uaet�e mnuern� ! i meLCU�tt'w►aes�a�eoaenssa-�-� _ i - -' � � \ \l� 1\���J I o�I1�� ��oo
I li
I � I ninnuin i :sma�cosae� , � ——�� I
� .!me�eaeeeo�.
� moMCn�ei �
' Imoaoos»e ; nmacenea ; c''� �
I, � ' :>�:siea�oeeeao;�� ' � t' � �
. tsimo�:aeo� � . ' � � . tsio�oasiao r- �xiea�ea�oea� . . ��I
rnntaoseao i i I �tsva►c�uae ntwua7w
� n��,ues�oa � � � Property owner information
. moaeesau
______ � i _ _ is valid for 3 months from
F _ _Imou,«w ' ;,,,- , 1. ___ e�.cnaae 1, the date printed on this map.
mo��oniei � -- _� _ � j��
,monmsea �IT� ' I � �
... .. �� _� �... �
m�a�a�� niunmu ' 1 ' � � i n�eMCacse� � ! �1�
, . ' iSN11YtNM lSiHql�tuo � m�C/DQ� ------- �
manwn ` �stu�caneo mo�eanx /�
I niumsse�LTON C:i ' nu�c�ttw nv�eu�a _ �NE
�
�, ' ,�munum �, .._,_ ._.� . rsioy,ane� ._ . mwea�w
muu�uo� aiau�m� ! �.
i �-�� rnw►wev�o�� _ j
.'� TSIqp�lfBO ' : ��. ��
� ... .... . . . �� . ... _.. ,-.. .___.-.
fStYLC�f�M I
I - +� , tflR��/N�1 . i ' _.� � .. 2S1[LCBi1BB
� � � niw�crnu�_
I aiuneeso� (� � ma�eu�a v
.. j ' '�---- � � �� ... _ i
, mwceroi \ .� � iwuvrx---' __
i mau�uw'mamwa = mrmirn� A
Ima�nax'CQ�au�+mamna"aumwna�j� nia�a:w niwem�a l�\� .
-- !_ ! 1 i _- r _ ; --- tstwcnsee mwear�
FONNER -- - n,�.�.,�,
� m��e�nr,'meu�aa�u� �
i r- - _ _ �
, �,
� . - � -_-,_T. �
/,� - ---_ --
� % I muoe��fsoo mnaeewq' � N
� nuoa�uu me�uum �suoao�:u nwmma \
. ... ... .' - ;� . . . , amoeesceo�"�/ xsiuo�oesee .. " ��� -..
,� �N CT o ,00 � �o �o F��
maouao:oe � � ___
nuaueoiw niem�roeo m ,
n�nn�nu' �A
mnuuud ""� /�V 1'=331 feet
\, � muu�rnl�,�� "�`C
� k +.
'
--i� � � �� i r 1���� �\
�` �i —��� --
� � � �� , � � ���ti-� Cit}'�f Tigard
� � � ��
� � �
/'1 Information on this map is fa ge�eral location only and
i l_. � '..- �. � � - should be venfied v.ifh the Develoqnent Services Division.
� ' � � � �-..._ 73125SWFIa1161W
_I �Q�\ _�\� G� r(503)63347�3 ,
1 I ��� \ � VO�� httplMww.ci.dgard.a.us
'---- - - -- - --� � �� .__ ..--- ---- - --------
- --- -- - -. _ . .--- � - - --� -- -- -----.__. _-- - -
Community Development Plot date:May 18,2004;C:\magiclMAGIC03.APR
2S103AC-01900 2S103BD-04401
ROGERS SHERRI L BRYANT TY D 8�NICOLE L
11230 SW FONNER ST 11565 SW FONNER ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
103AC-OS 0 2 03BD-10700
200 - ARTITION PLAT BR T &NICOLE L
OW RS LOT 2 115 FONNER ST
, ARD,0 97223
2S103D6-09400 2S103AC-D7900
ABEYTA THOMAS J AND DEBORAH L BURGESS FAMILY TRUST
11370 SW ERSTE DR 32399 SW LAKE DR
TIGARD,OR 97223 WILSONVILLE,OR 97070
2S1036D-09800 2S103AC-06200
BACH KRISTA BURGESS JAMES F&MARY B
12945 SW 116TH PL 11350 SW FONNER ST
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1036D-04300 2S103AC-O5500
BALDWIN JAMES RONALD JR BURK RICK R
11675 SW FONNER 12687 SW 113TH PL
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103BD-O5800 2S103AC-04000
BAZZEL JESSIE R 8�ALICIA L BURNS FAMILY TRUST
12727 SW 116TH AVE 12590 SW 114TH TER
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103AC-D6700 2S1036D-05900
BILODEAU DOUGLAS J& CARGILE CHRISOPHER&GINA
NICOLE S 12720 SW 116TH AVE
12899 SW 113TH PL TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
2 AC-06 0 2S103AC-08100
BLAZ OMES INC CARNAGEY ROBERT
11389 SW FONNER ST
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103BD-07600 2S103D8-09300
BOECK MARK G&CATHERINE L CLARKE JOHN G&KARYN S
12621 SW 115TH AVE 11380 SW ERSTE PL
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103CA-00208 2S103AC-05300
BOYTE HOWARD AND MARILYN CONNELL JAMES JESSE
11560 SW FONNER 12731 SW 113TH PL
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103DB-09600 2S103AC-05000
CULBERTSON JON C FRANK CRAIG E&LORI A
11385 SW ERSTE PL 12797 SW 113TH PL
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103BD-o9100 2S103DB-09900
DAVE AMATO&ASSOC LTD FRANK LARRY AND ANGELA
PO BOX 19576 11480 SW SONNE PLACE
PORTLAND,OR 97280 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103AC-04100 2S103BD-06200
DURFEE MICHAEL D AND GENIUCH RONALD W&EDITH M
BUTTERFIELD MELISSA 12664 SW 116TH AVE
12612 SW 114TH TERR TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD, OR 97223
2S103CA-00100 2S103AC-02300
EDWARDS WILLIAM M GERTZ KENNETH E
PAULINE M 19200 SW 46TH AVE
13105 SW 115TH TUALATIN,OR 97062
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103AC-00600 2S103AC-02600
EMME LARRY M GIANOLA JEFFREY W&SHANNON L
11221 SW FONNER ST 11550 SW FONNER ST
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
251036D-08900 25103AC-04300
FENTON JASON R GOETZ JEANNE
12996 SW 116TH PL 12758 SW 114TH TERRACE
PORTLAND, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103AC-02400 2S103AC-07000
FILLER DAVID E&MARY C GOHIER PATRICIA LYNN/PIERRE
11500 SW FONNER ST 12955 SW 113TH PL
PORTLAND, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103AC-01401 2S103AC-06400
FLEMING DAVID L GRECO LEONARD R
11227 SW FONNER 8151 SIMMS SL
TIGARD, OR 97223 ARVADA,CO 80005
2S103AC-02200 2S103AC-07800
FONNER LLC GRECO LEONARD R
BY TRACY ANN BEAN 11441 SW FONNER ST
2744 SW SCHOLLS FERRY RD TIGARD,OR 97223
PORTLAND,OR 97221
2S103AC-06600 2S103AC-06300
FORDE CHARLES E& GRECO LEONARD R&JULIE M
ELAINE P 11441 SW FONNER ST
12855 SW 113TH PL TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103BD-09200 257036D-04000
HALL SHANNON KAWASAKI NOBUO SHARON LE
12990 SW 116TH AVE 5750 E HILLCREST DR
TIGARD,OR 97223 PORT ORCHARD,WA 98366
2S1038D-O6000 2S1038D-06400
HAYDEN DARRON R&WENDY KNAPPICH THOMAS R&CAROL A
12716 SW 116TH AVE 12626 SW 116TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
251036D-10100 2S103DB-1070D
HEETER JO E& KNUTSON RICHARD AND JOYCE
SILL PAULINE R 11475 SW SONNE PLACE
11545 SW ELTON CT TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103AC-05400 2S103AC-08000
HELLHAKE JIM KRAVCHENKO LIYA
12709 SW 113TH PL 8364 5W PFAFFLE#210
PORTLAND, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1038D-O5500 2S1036D-05700
HERBST JAMES A&NANCY H KYRISS RICHARD B&CONSTANCE L
12679 SW 116TH AVE 12703 SW 116TH AVE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224
2S103BD-06100 2S103AC-04200
HILDENBRAND RYAN P&JENNER L LIBERT SCOTT A AND CYNTHIA M
12712 SW 116TH AVE 12636 SW 114TH TERRACE
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103AC-01400 ' 2S703BD-10400
HOBBS RONALD E AND JUNE E MAHUNA TYSON 8
7205 SW VENTURA DR MORRIS LESLIE ANN
TIGARD,OR 97223 12833 5W 116TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103CA-00209 2S1036D-10300
HOLMES JOAN M MCNULTY CORY/RACHEL
13050 SW HOWARD DR 12830 SW 116TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
25103D6-09500 2S103BD-O5600
HONEYCUTT PROPERTIES LLC MIX KELLY C&WYNONA G
1205 SE GRAND AVE 12681 SW 116TH AVE
PORTLAND, OR 97214 TIGARD,OR 97223
103AC-059 2S103AC-07500
HU L CREEK ESTATES NAVAS MARIANA
OWN F LOTS 3-6 12958 SW 113TH PL
, TIGARD,OR 97223
251038D-06300 251038D-09400
NEWPORT DOUGLAS W&JANET M ROBINSON KATHRYN
12648 5W 116TH AVE 12985 SW 116TH PL
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1038D-09500 2S103AC-01200
NGUYEN HUY N ROUSE DANIEL K
12973 SW 116TH PL 11385 SW FONNER ST
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223
2 S 103 CA-00306 2S 103 DB-09700
NORSWORTHY HOLLY SCHOPPE PAUL 8 KATHRYN J
11660 SW FONNER STREET 11395 SW ERSTE PL
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1036D-09900 2S103AC-01700
NOTTINGHAM SCOTT P& SCHULTHEIS ERIC D 8
MARGARET E 11180 SW FONNER ST
11587 SW ELTON CT TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97224
25103AC-01300 2S103AC-07300
OAK RICKY J& BARBARA T SCHWEITZ ERIC A&
11245 SW FONNER ST MARTHA L
TIGARD,OR 97223 12980 SW 113TH PL
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103AC-07400 2S103BD-09600
OEHLER RUSSELL E& SCOTT MATTHEW C&
CATHERINE A LAURETTE L
12972 SW 113TH PL 12961 SW 116TH PL
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103BD-10200 25103AC-06800
O'REILLY JAMES/ANDREA SELLICK LEE A&ELIZABETH J
11533 SW ELTON CT 12911 SW 113TH PL
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S 103AC-07200 2 S 103AC-05600
PETROV JOHN M&MALISSA A SHIPLEY LANE A 8 LUCY A
12999 SW 113TH PL 12665 SW 113TH PL
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103AC-01100 2S103AC-06500
PHELAN THOMAS C SMITH GEOFFREY K&
4504 GRANT ST JANEA
VANCOUVER,WA 98660 12801 SW 113TH PL
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103D6-00100 2S103BD-02300
POTTER ERIC R& SMITH ROSS JAY
DAMERON CHRISTINA M 11760 SW CARMEN ST
13030 SW 115TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103AC-05200 251038D-093D0
SOB KRISHNA B TSAI JASON V&SANDRA THYDA
12753 SW 113TH PL 12991 SW 116TH PL
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103AC-07600 2S103AC-06900
STERNKOPF PETER V 8 TERI L TURNER STEVEN R&MARY JENA
12933 SW 113TH PL 12933 SW 113TH PL
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103AC-07100 251038D-10000
STEWART PETER B&TRACY D VOORHEES DANIEL W/SANDRA
12977 SW 113TH PL 11571 SW ELTON CT
TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103BD-09000 2S103AC-05100
SZALVAY LASZLO S&ALISON J WINGEIER RICHARD CLAYTON 8
12994 SW 116TH PL RACHEL ANN
TIGARD, OR 97223 12775 SW 113TH PL
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S103AC-06100 2S103CA-00207
THOMPSON JANET WOODLEY MICHAEL&CASSANDRA B
11340 SW FONNER ST 11590 SW FONNER
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S1038D-09700 2S103DB-10000
THOREN THEODORE J& YOUNG VANCE A
KIMBERLY J 11470 SW SONNE PL
12957 SW 116TH PL PORTLAND,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
2 1036D-OS 0
TIG ITY OF
131 LL
T ARD,OR 97223
3AC-0 0
TIGA ITY OF
131 SW L
TI ARD,OR 97223
2 03BD-10 0
TIG ITY OF
1312 ALL
T ARD,OR 97223
2 38D-10 0
TIGA ITY OF
131 SW L
T ARD,OR 97223
Brooks Gaston
3206 Princess
Edinburg, TX 78539
Don & Dorothy Erdt
13760 SW 121st Avenue
Tigard, OR 97223
Ellen Beilstein
14630 SW 139th Avenue
Tigard, OR 97224
Martha Bishop
10590 SW Cook Lane
Tigard, OR 97223
Vanessa Foster
13085 SW Howard Drive
Tigard, OR 97223
Susan Beilke
11755 SW 114th Place
Tigard, OR 97223
CPO 46
16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242
Tigard, OR 97224
Patricia Keerins
12195 SW 121 st Avenue
Tigard, OR 97223
John Frewing
7110 SW Lola Lane
Tigard, OR 97223
CITY OF TIGARD - LENTRAL �IT SUBCOMMITTEE �i:lcurpin\setupllabels\CIT Central.doc) UPDATED: 18-May-04
05/17/2004 23: 26 5036437905 SFA DESIGN GROUP PAGE 01
� � .
ClTY �F TIGARD � ���,,,���j'�
COMMUNITY DEYELOPM£NT DEPARTMENT � "
P[ANNING DIYISION
{3 I 25 SW HALL BOULEYARD CITY OF,TIOARD
TIGARD, OREGON 9722.3 Communsty�Devefapment
SFiapitrgA�cttcrGbmrrir�nily
PHONE_ 503•639•d111 FA1L 501-684-]291 (Attn: Patty/Planning)
° � �J' 0 ° 00 Op�f' � � p �� p ° ��� �
Property owner information is valid fior 3 months from the date of your request
INDICATE ALL PROJECT MAP & TAX LOT NUMBERS (i.e. �s��Ae, Tax Lot 00100) OR THE
ADDRESSES FOR ALL PROJECT PARCELS BELOW:
2 5 I a 3 �4 C_ �I� 23 aQ
iNDICATE WHETHER YOU ARE REQUESTING 1, 2 OR 3 SETS OF LAB�LS: �--
(NOTE: A minimum of 2 sets of labels will be provided (unless only holding a neighborhood meeting at this time) to place on
your 2 sets of envelopes that applicants are required to submit at the time af application submittal. If a neighborhood
meeting is required and you have not yet held that meeting, you can request 3 sets provided your land use application will be
submitted and deemed complete by the Planning Division within 3 months from this request.}
NAME OF CONTACT PERSON: UV�a���ra,G � , � PHONE: G ��"�31 I
This requ�st may be mailed, axed or hand delivered to the City of igard. Please allow a
2�day minimum for processing reques{s. Upon compfetion of yaur request, the contact person will be
cpalled to pick e eh�ir request that will be placed in "Will Call" by their last name, at the Community
evelopment R ption Desk. .
The cost of processing your request must be paid at #he time of pick up, as exact cost can not be
pre-defi�rmined.
PI.�ASE NOTE� FOR REASONS OF ACCURACY, ONI.Y ORlGINAI. MAIL[NG I..ABELS PROVIDED
BY TH� CITY VS, RE•TYPED MAILING LABEL,S WILL B� ACCEPT�D.
Cost bescripHon;
$11 to generate the mailing list, plus$2 per sheet far printing the list onto(abels(20 addresses per sheet).
Then, multi I the cost to rint one set of labels b the number of sets re uested.
EXAMPI,E COST FOR THIS REQUEST
4 sheets of labels x$Z/sheet=�Q x 2 sets= $16.00 .�sheet(s)of labels x$2lsheet= �� x °� se �i�
2 sheets af labels x$2lsheet for CIT area x 2 sets=$ 4.44 �sheet{s)of labels x$2/sheet for,ClT area=�x,�s�� -'�
G�N�RATE L157 =� ,� GENERATE LIS7 =
TOTAL =$31.00 � �� TOTAL � 2�
� J
05/17/2004 23:20 5036437905 SFA DESIGN GROUP PAGE 02
,'' � - .
.�
C�TY OF TIGARD I��
�
COMMUN[n DEYELOPMENT D�PAR7MENT `�c�. I
PLANNING DIVISlON � �
13115 SW HALC BOULEYARD CRYCFTIOARO
TIGARD, OREGON 9T223 c�►►imu►i�t}'rDeveCopmerct
S�iapir�g,ld(8etter�ommunity
PNONE: 503-6)9-4171 FAX: 503-684-7297 (Aiin: Patty/Planning)
a p O ° oo QQ� oaoo�� Q ° � lYIN1il
LSLIIIII ll
Property owner infiormation is valid for 3 months from the date of your request
INDICATE ALL PROJECT MAP & TAX LOT NUMBERS (i.e. 1S134Aa, Tax l.ot 00100) OR TH�
ADDRESSES FOR ALL PROJECT PARCELS BELOW:
2- C� C a t� � C�
1NDICATE WHETHER YOU ARE REQUESTING 1, 2 OR 3 SETS OF LABELS: 2
(I�OTE: A minimum of 2 sets of labels will be provided (unless only holding a neighborhoad meeting at this time) to place on
your 2 sets of env�lopes that applicants are required to submit at the time of application submittal. If a neighborhood
meeting is required and you have not yet held fhat meeting,you can request 3 sets provided your land use application will be
submitted and de�med complete by the Planning Division wifhin 3 months from this request.)
NAME 0� CONTACT PERSON: w S � PHONE: N/-�
This re�uest may e maiied, faxed or hand delivered to the City of Tigard. Please allow a
2-day minimum for processing reques{s. Upon completion of your request, #h� contact person will be
called to pick up the�ir request that will be plac�d in "Wifl Cal�' by their last name, at the Community
Development Reception Desk. ,
The cost of processing your request must be paid at the time of pick up, as exact cost can not be
pre-determined,
PLEASE NOTE: FOR REASONS OF ACCURACY, ONLY ORIGINAL MAILING I.ABELS PROVIDEn
BY THE CITY VS, RE�1'YPED MAILING LABELS WILL B� ACCEPTED.
Cost DesCription;
$11 to generate the mailing list, plus$2 per sheet for printing the list onto labels(20 addresses per sheet).
Then, multi I the cost to rint one set of labels b the number of sets re uested.
EXAMPLE COSY FOR THIS F2EQUEST
4 sheets of labels x$2lsheet= 8.00 x 2 sets = $16.00 �sheet(s)of(abels x$2/sheet=�_x sets=
2 sheets of labels x$2/sheet for CIT area x 2 sets=$ 4.00 �sheet(s)of labels x$2lsheet for CIT area=�x_sets=
GENERATE LIST -�$11-00 GENERATE LIST =�
TOTAL =$31.00 TOTAL =�
,
• , . PRE,APP.HElD BY:
CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION
13125 SW HALL 60ULEVARD TIGARD, OR 97223-8189 �
503.639.41711503.684.7297 �
CITY OF TIGARD
i
OREGON �
LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION
File# j� �.i: �0� C� Other Case # ��o Y - (;��'� �' '
�
Date By Receipt# ��=`� ' `����5 City U Urb ❑ Date Complete� '
TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR ,
❑AdjustmenWariance (I or II) �Minor Land Partition (II) ❑Zone Change (III)
❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment (IV) ❑ Planned Development (III) ❑Zone Change Annexation (IV) ,
❑ Conditional Use (III) ❑ Sensitive Lands Review (I, II or III) ❑Zone Ordinance Amendment (IV)
❑ Historic Overlay (II or III) ❑ Site Development Review {II)
❑ Home Occupation (II) ❑ Subdivision (II or III)
I
ress i avai a e
1 �0 �
25 03 23QO
O . C�� �e. �- `-� . S
G e�c� Z. � vts v c1Kcr�
1 �1200 S '�1�a va, r�+tin Q OCgZ
so3- 2 �33
I� e, en-�-z 5c�3-C� Z-33 G ri
ac is i more an one
� 2 iC
`When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be �purchaser of record or a lessee in
possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The ners must sign this appiication in the
s ace rovided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this a lication.
ease e spea ic
3-\o o a 'o e..c)►' d-+r.e-e. r
APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT ALL OF THE REG�UIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS AS
DESCRIBED IN THE "BASIC SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS" INFORMATION SHEET.
THE APPLICANT SHALL CERTIFY THAT:
♦ If the application is granted, the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the
terms and subject to ali the conditions and limitations of the approval.
♦ All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits
transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based
on this application, map be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false.
♦ The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria,
and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application(s).
SIGNATURES OF EACH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED.
L �'�- °
wner's Signature Date
Owner's Signature Date
Owner's Signature Date
Owner's Signature Date
Owner's Signature Date
Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date
ApplicantlAgentlRepresentative's Signature Date
�
� ` ^_
CITY OF T16ARD
('ornnuurity�7ere(�pntcnt
S'kaE�irrf�,� �R��ttcr(nmunurity
LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION
120 DAYS = 9/30/2004
Fi�E No.: MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2004-040Q=�
FILE TITLE: GERTZ PARTITION
APPLICANT/ Kenneth E. Gertz
OWNER: Gertz Construction, Inc.
19200 SW 46th Avenue
Tualatin, OR 97062
REQUEST: A request for approval of a three (3) lot Minor Land Partition of .63 acres. Parcel one
has an existing home on site. Parcels two and three will be developed with single-family
residences. The lot sizes for this development would be 8,088, 7,715, and 9,065 square
feet respectively.
LOCATION: 11480 SW Fonner Street; WCTM 2S103AC, Tax Lot 2300.
ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to
accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential
units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family
units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted
conditionally.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715,
18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
CIT AREA: Central
DECISION MAKING BODY BELOW: ❑ TYPE I � TYPE II ❑ TYPE III ❑ TYPE IV
DATE COMMENTS WERE SENT: JUNE 3, 2004 DATE COMMENTS ARE DUE: JUNE 17, 2004
❑HEARINGS OFFICER [MONJ DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM
❑PLANNING COMMISSION [MON.I DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM
❑CITY COUNCIL RUESJ DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 1:30PM
�STAFF DECISION RENTATIVEI DATE OF DECISION: JULY 14. 2004
COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION
� VICINITY MAP � PARTITION PLAT � TREE PLAN
� SITE PLAN � CWS LETTER � IMPACT STUDY
� NARRATIVE ❑ GRADING PLANS � OTHER:
STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheideqqer, Associate Planner (503) 639-4171, Ext. 2437
. .__�. . .__. e_1
LAND USE APPLIC��'ION DateeCt 5,� �LL�+�`� �'�.P
- � -�
COMPLETENESS REVIEVY ❑ COMPLETE ❑ INCOMPLETE
NDARD INFORMATION;
❑ eed/TitlelPraof Of Ownership � Neighborhoad Mtg. Affidavits, Minutes, list 0(Attendees �] Impact Study(18.390)
USA Service Provider Letter �onstruction fost Estimate ❑ # Sets Of Application Materials/Plans
[� Pre-Application Conference Notes Eavelopes With Postage (Yeri(y Count)
RO ECT STATISTICS:
❑ %Building Footprint Size ❑ %Of landscaping On Site ❑ %Of Building Impervious Surface On Site
[� lat Square Footage
PLANS DIMENSIONED:
❑ Building footprint ❑ Parking Space Dimensions(ladude Access�ble 6 Bike P�rking) ❑ Truck Loading Space Where Applicable
❑ Building Height [✓� Access Approach And Aisle ❑ Yisual Clearance Triangle Shown
D TIO AL P NS:
Yianity�lap ❑ Archi ctural Plan � Tree Inventory
[� Existing Candidons Plan ❑ la scape Plan
[/� Site Plan ❑ ighting Plan
TREE PLANIMITIGATION PLAN:
o a
❑ a
aDITIONAL REPORTS: (list any special reports) ❑
❑ �
❑ ❑
RESPONSE TO APPLICABLE CODE SECTI�NS•
❑ I 8330�c�d��u�� ❑ I 8.620�r�a r��o��swa�a:� � I H.�6S(OR-Sueet Pukine/lwding Ikquiraneno)
❑ 18.340��r:�c�e�� I 8.630(wuhi��Sq���e��i c��o� ❑ I 8.1]S���kri�w�
❑ I 8350�e o�d��q � 18.105���c�� [7j 18.]80 ry�l
❑ I8.360�u o��c�j ❑ I8_I I0��o�u�,��? ❑ I8.18S R�ux r�m:��
❑ 18.3]0 r��w�o�� [v� 18.715(u��q[�p�ati�} [� 18.190(1r��r�►
❑ 18.380 R��n�R��a�a� ❑ I 5.720��c«��oeaq sa�aua�� [�- I 8.195�r�a��a��
❑ I 8.385��►��y d I S.JZS(Eariaunent�f Perfanuna Stindyds) ❑ 18.197�w�o�r�{wy o�r o�
[v] I 8390�n�,�nn«e��M so�a� � ❑ I 8.730�x«�o�s ro o�����sa�a�a:� ❑ I 8.798(wxe�ss coR��a000 Fwwc�s)
❑ I 8.410�c��a�u�a� ❑ I 8.140�o�a�� [� I 8.810�a��c a uo�q�rorement SdndLds)
� 18.420�a ryoa�y ❑ 18.742�o��,�r�,�„�a�
❑ I8.430�a� Q 18.145���g a s���e s�,a��
[J� I E.S I O(Residenwl Iom�g Distriar) ❑ I 8.150��ruo,Re�naea�k�o��
❑ I8.520���i��Y o�a�� ❑ I8.1S5�niccd Solid Wuodkqdng Smnge)
❑ I 8.530(�ao-��g u�soius) ❑ 18.160(Na�c«i�o�og�mieo�s)
ADDITIONAL ITEMS:
I:�curpl�lrnasterslrevisedUand use appliption oompleteness review.dot REVISEO: 17-Jan-01
- �
�PPII CAT►(jr� �s ����oMPle�-e
L�TreR h�s No-r QECrv SGNT
o�}. �,J,P►' ' � v- �
�T�1W� o r �1. �..3
c..or..�.Q��,. rt�,:i �L�.ds
�-o �o a�� Q,� -r���D,�y
Yi'1� I l�''=' . L—e �}e� i s
1n m� �;r�c�or�.� .
May 10, 2004
CITY OF TIGARD
OREGON
Gertz Construction
Attn: Ken Gertz
19200 SW 46th Avenue
Tualatin, OR 97062
Dear Mr. Gertz:
RE: Notice of Incomplete Application Submittal — MLP2004-00004
The City of Tigard received your application submittal for a Minor Land Partition on April
12, 2004. The development site is located at 2S103AC, tax lot 02300. This letter is to
inform you that additional materials will be needed in order to deem your application
cornplete. The necessary materials are as follows:
1. A current title report showing ownership, easements, liens, etc.
2. Submit two sets of pre-stamped, pre-addressed envelopes.
3. The items in the enclosed public facility completeness checklist must be addressed.
Any questions can be direct�d to Kim McMillan at (503)639-4171 ext.2642.
For the purposes of completeness review, please submit only 3 copies of the revised
materials. If the submitted materials are adequate, I will contact you promptly and ask
you to submit the remaining number of copies needed, and your two sets of envelopes.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (503) 639-4171, x2437.
Sincerel ,
� ,�� =�....-..�
M thew Scheidegg�
Associate Planner
c: MLP2004-00004 Land Use File
13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772
� �PU�BLIC FAClLlTY PLAN Project: .-onner Partition
COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST Date: 5/11/04
GRADING
� Existin and ro osed contours shown.
❑ Are there radin im acts on ad�acent arcels? No
❑ Ad�acent arcel rades shown. NA
❑ Geotech stud submitted? NA
STREETISSUES
� Ri ht-of-wa clearl shown.
❑ Centerline of street s clearl shown. Show and label centerline
� Street name s shown.
� Existin / ro osed curb or ed e of avement shown.
❑ Street rofiles shown. NA
❑ Future Street Plan: Must show street profiles, topo NA
on ad�acent arcel s , etc.
❑ Traffic Im act and/or Access Re ort NA
❑ Street rades com liant? NA
❑ StreeUROW widths dimensioned and appropriate? Show ROW width for east-west section of
Fonner Street
❑ Private Streets? Less than 6 lots and width NA
a ro riate?
❑ Other: Half-street improvements Applicant must request that they be allowed
to provide a future improvement guarantee
for half-sfreet im rovements.
SANITARY SEWER ISSUES
� Existin / ro osed lines shown.
❑ Stubs to ad'acent arcels re uired/shown?
WATER ISSUES
❑ Existin / ro osed lines w/ sizes noted? Show existin line and size
� Existin / ro osed fire h drants shown?
❑ Pro osed meter location and size shown? Show meter/ocations and sizes
❑ Pro osed fire rotection s stem shown? NA
STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES
� Existin / ro osed lines shown?
❑ Preliminary sizing calcs for water quality/detention Fee-in-lieu is allowed for partitions
rovided?
❑ Water ualit /detention facilit shown on lans? NA
❑ Area for facilit match r uirements from calcs? NA
❑ Facilit shown outside an wetland buffer? NA
❑ Storm stubs to ad�acent arcels re uired/shown? NA
The submittal is hereby deemed ❑ COMPLETE � INCOMPLETE
REVISED: 05/11/04
�f By:'. Date: 5/11/04
REVISED: 05/11/04
1
��l v�/-�L � �O U
PUBL/C FACILITY PLAN Project: ronner Partition
COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST Date: 5.�11/04
GRADING
� Existin and ro osed contours shown.
❑ Are there radin im acts on ad'acent arcels? No
❑ Ad�acent arcel rades shown. NA
❑ Geotech stud submitted? NA
STREETISSUES
� Ri ht-of-wa clearl shown.
Centerline of street s clearl shown. Show and label cenferline
� Street name s shown.
� Existin / ro osed curb or ed e of avement shown.
❑ Street rofiles shown. NA
❑ Future Street Plan: Must show street profiles, topo NA
on ad'acent arcel s , etc.
❑ Traffic Im act and/or Access Re ort NA
❑ Street rades com liant? NA
Street/ROW widths dimensioned and appropriate? Show ROW width for east-west section of
Fonner Street I
❑ Private Streets? Less than 6 lots and width NA
a ro riate?
Other: Half-street improvements Applicant must request that they be allowed
to provide a future improvement guarantee
for half-street im rovements.
SANITARY SEWER ISSUES
� Existin / ro osed lines shown.
❑ Stubs to ad�acent arcels re uired/shown?
W ER ISSUES
Existin / ro osed lines w/sizes noted? Show existin line and size
� Existin / ro osed fire h drants shown?
Pro osed meter location and size shown? Show meter locafions and sizes
❑ Pro osed fire rotection s stem shown? NA
STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES
� Existin / ro osed lines shown?
❑ Preliminary sizing calcs for water quality/detention Fee-in-lieu is allowed for partitions
rovided?
❑ Water ualit /detention facilit shown on lans? NA
❑ Area for facilit match �e uirements from calcs? NA
❑ Facilit shown outside an wetland buffer? NA
❑ Storm stubs to ad�acent arcels re uired/shown? NA
The submittal is hereby dee ed �COMPLETE � INCOMPLETE
REVISED: 05/11/04 ��� �.� �� �
v
,
. 5FA Design Group, LLC
STRUCTURAL � CIVIL � LAND USE PLANNING
May 18, �oo4 �ECEI VED
Mathew Scheidegger � � �' %���r„;
City of Tigard
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
'°� ,�,, . ' .,�FT�Gfir���,
Tigard, Oregon 97223 -
Re: Notice of Incomplete for File# MLP2004-00004, Fonner Partition.
Dear Mathew,
This letter is a response to your notice of incomplete for the proposed Fonner Partition including
the Public Facility Plan checklist you atta.ched from Kim McMillan of the Engineering
Department. Each of the incompleteness items is listed below with a response regarding that
item.
1. A current title report showing ownership, easements, liens, etc.
RESPONSE: Current title information is included with this letter.
2. Submit two sets of pre-stamped,pre-addressed envelopes.
RESPONSE: Two sets of pre-stamped, pre-addressed envelopes are included with
this letter.
3. The items in the enclosed public faciliry completeness checklist must be addressed.
RESPONSE: The items in the enclosed public facility completeness checklist have
been addressed through changes to the plans or as noted below.
a. The centerline is clearly shown and labeled.
b. The right-of-way width for the east-west section of Fonner is shown.
c. The applicant is requesting that they be allowed to provide a future improvement
guarantee for half-street improvements to Fonner. This will be in the form of a
Restrictive Covenant entered into by the applicant. In this case, street
improvements are not currently practical.
d. The existing water lines and sizes have been added to the plans.
e. Water meter locations and sizes have been placed on the plans.
f. The applicant has requested a fee in lieu of providing a water quality/detention
facility as allowed for partition.
9020 SW Washington Square Drive,Suite 350•Portland,Oregon 97223•503-641-8311 • Fax 503 643 7905•wwwsfadesigngroup.com
I
r
Thank you for your timely review of this project and please contact me at ow office should you
have any additional questions.
Sincerely,
SFA Design Group, LLC.
/�'/ l��2� y.
Matthew L. Sprague
Project Manager/Planner - Principal
June 2, 2004
CITY OF TIGARD
OREGON
Gertz Construction
Attn: Ken Gertz
19200 SW 46�h Avenue
Tualatin, OR 97062
Dear Mr. Gertz:
RE: Notice of Complete Application Submittal f MLP2004-00004)
The City has reviewed your submittal material and finds that your
application is complete as of 6/2/04. Staff will now review your application
for Land Partition Approval and associated applications. A decision will be
rendered within 6-8 weeks.
I am available to answer questions and otherwise assist you as may be
required at 503-639-4171, extension 2437. Office hours are from 8:00
a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. If I am not available, please
leave your name and phone number so that I can call you as soon as,
possible.
Sincerely,
�
� ��
Mathew Scheidegg�
Associate Planner
c: MLP2004-00004 Land Use File
13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772
t
w � r
� �
,
�
o �'
�� o� � o
�
�
, �
�
,
=� � Fidelity National Title Company of Oregon
w
1001 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 400 • Portland, OR 97204
(503) 223-8338 • FAX (503) 227-8425
SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE
FOR THE
PROPOSED PARTITION OF
P-GERTZ
ORDER NO.: 01-551190-28 FEE: 5200.00
DATED: May 13, 2004
Fidelity National Title Insurance Company
GUARANTEES
Any County or City within which the subdivision or proposed subdivision is located:
That the estate or interest in the land which is covered by this Guarantee is:
A Fee
According to the public records which impart constructive notice of matters affecting title to the
premises described on Exhibit "One", we find that as of May 4, 2004, at 5:00 p.m. the last deed of
record runs to:
Kenneth E. Gertz
We also find the following apparentencumbrances,which include 'BlanketEncumbrances' as defined
by ORS 92.305(1), and also easements, restrictive covenants and rights of way.
NOTE: taxes as follows:
�I , �.
Order No. 01-551190-28
Property taxes, and any assessments collected with taxes, for the fiscal year 2002-2003.
Amount: S 1,617.12
Unpaid Balance: S 193.51 plus interest, if any
Account No.: R470573
Subdivision Guarentee(GUAfiG71 Page 2
� �
Order No. 01-551190-28
Map No.: 2S13AC-02300
Levy Code: 023.74
Property taxes, and any assessments collected with taxes,for the fiscal year 2003-2004.
Amount: $1,641 .62
Unpaid Balance: S 1 ,641 .62 plus interest, if any
7. City liens in favor of the City of Tigard, if any.
There are no liens as of May 13, 2004.
2. Rights of the public and governmental agencies in and to any portion of said land lying
within the boundaries of streets, roads and highways.
3. Leases and/or tenancies, if any.
4. Personal property taxes, if any.
5. No search has been made for financing statements filed in the office of the Secretary of
State, or in any county other than the county in which the herein described land is
located. No liability is assumed for any firiancing statement filed in the office of the
County Clerk (Recorder) covering timber, crops, fixtures or contracts affecting said land
if said land is not described by metes and bounds, recorded lot and block or under the
rectangular survey system.
cc: Gertz Const.-Ken Gertz
SFA Design Group-Matt Sprague
Land Development-Jeff W.
We have also searched our General Index for judgments and state and federal liens against the
grantees named above and find:
NONE
Subdivision Guarentee(GUARG71 Page 3
-- l
Order No. 01-551190-28
This is not a report issued preliminary to the issuance of a title insurance policy. Our search is limited
and its use is intended as an informational report only, to be used in conjunction with the
development of real property. Liability is limited to an aggregate sum not to exceed $1 ,000.00.
Fidelity National Title Insurance Company
By:
Jeff Wilson, Advisory Title Officer
NOTE - ORS 92.305(1) reads as follows:
"Blanket encumbrance" means a trust deed or mortgage or any other lien ar encumbrance,
mechanics' lien or otherwise, securing or evidencing the payment of money and affecting more than
one interest in subdivided or series partitioned land, or an agreement affecting more than one such
lot, parcel or interest by which the subdivider, series partitioner or developer holds such subdivision
or series partition under an option, contract to sell or trust agreement.
Subdivision Guarantee IGUARG71 Page 4
_ J
Order No. 01-55 1 1 90-28
EXHIBIT "ONE"
The premises are in WASHINGTON County and are described as follows:
PARCEL I:
The following real property situated in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon,
described as follows, to-wit:
BEGINNING at a point in the center of County Road No. 495, which point of beginning bears South
0°53' West along the North and South center line of Section 3, Township 2 South, Range 1 West
of the Willamette Meridian, a distance of 2216.8 feet from the one-quarter corner on the North line
of said Section 3, and which point of beginning bears North 0°53' East 462.0 feet from an iron pipe
at the recognized center of said Section 3; thence from the above described point of beginning South
0°53' West in the center of said County Road No. 495, a distance of 126.9 feet; thence South
89°53`East 191 .0 feet; thence North 0°53' East 134.7 feet to the center of said County Road No.
495; thence South 87°46'West 191 .2 feet to the place of beginning.
PARCEL II:
BEGINNING at a point in the center line of County Road No. 495 (Fonner Road), which point is
2343.7 feet South 0°53' West along the North and South center line of Section 3, Township 2
South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and
State of Oregon, from the North one-quarter corner of said Section 3, which point is also the
Southwest corner of that tract conveyed to Joseph E. Fitey, et ux, by Deed Book 436, Page 530,
Washington County Deed Records; thence continuing South 0°53' West 50 feet to the Northwest
corner of that tract conveyed to Fenimore F. Walrod Jr., et ux, by Deed Book 374, Page 355;thence
South 89°53' East along the North line of the Walrod tract, 191 .0 feet to the Northeast corner
thereof; thence North 0°53' East 50 feet to the Southeast corner of the aforementioned Filey tract;
thence North 89°53' West along the South line of said Filey tract, 191 .0 feet to the point of
beginning.
Subdivision Guarentee(GUARG7) Pa9e `�
�
(� � ' 1'
� a'" �, $ � � ae° t c� ,.. `;,>,:��::�:;:';; 9� $ e
� � '� n n N q �0� ,� °0. �; ,:,�' �
fJ ,� � ,y 6�000� ry^� ,o� � ,�0�� � .
�' � a
�r0�9E� \ :a.1�ati if►> ry � �'� 1
� �� ��j�� � ` � 1
- � ��� � � , s � ��Y�� d �.1.
Q n � �'+� ' i:"; :
*, v ���� � �� � gn � G��h �`;� ' � �I +, �;,'���
Q t � �„ � � r . '�,' .� `�
,. � � � � • � r• �ti; �� � � , `� ,:
N �:� �� , � � �;r
,� �
�?�i .
���� ��� � ' � � � � ,
00'L>i 'I ���� I��!.�
3�9� - - ,�' ` ',; <i
. t �
� ,„
�°' � w I ��,
� � ; !
p � � 8 :;',
}r. � ^ ��� � ��'��'����
V � r � ry
� ,�
aa�s9 �
ortr oo. � `��':�
OCret pp•py pp.g �.. 30o•¢4�OON ` � m : ..
1 �9t Ol'9Ll ,,,;:,I ,t �,'�• '�eb
� � � '���� [d'l8 ���
� � I � g Q :�R��4�,
� n � , � � s � � ,�
� � n '
Q V ;W � N r � ' � I
y ry Qd U g ' '' „ �: , ��;� I
x � �.� :-���
.�, e � �� �' g I< g n �f o � ,
�
� ' . � � r� � � v� ,,�� �
" � N +t I M ,.��� � ,.� � ,. , '
� � � q ; ;;,; ,
� ,�- Q" I �, � �� W �,�'
� � I � � I � o � �
, �:, � �
�� ,., ' � � �, �
08'Dbl Qp�pg pp,ge '', , ,; �
00' 0�'9Ll • - � . .
' �oe�o� . '; �
����������������������a��y � ('�j�9�1° �����,��
., . . le� i GI�};���������������������I
� ' � ' i ��l ��
<< �
�, � , '�,�� �h�A � ; , � , ', 0/8l , i �(�
;.,` Y� r'��i � �� � i e�e / � ,�I � ' �
�:1 �.�a. ��~r ). ' � t � t- ; .' p�� � I��',{I'}I,�� .
rir'Ft.�Gi.��V� � �''rl E'' Z �i: ' F �+ ..,� � � 41 � � � .���;�/'Y.�.ln / .� �'f . � ' ,
�; � � ��
:.� � �4 � � �
' ����qr<<� ; r 0 . , ' a
. , r'�Yc`�#7� < �Y��� y � 1 .•1`� ` �I �'f� f 'r� '- ,; ! r{!�QQ �i
_ �,,�1�Li.n���MY(��J� � :��' '��{.{.��.r ...4�. ! ,. . n..�p. :����N�:�. .. � �I. . • .. . �. fV�" n
� Y� . ?
Pro osed
p
Subdivision Vesting
Fidelity National Title Company of Oregon
Land DevelopmendBuilder Services Division
1001 SW 5th Avenue, Suite 400 z
Portland, OR 97204 �
(503) 223-8338 L
m
Idbs@fnf.com =
a
�
�
Disclaimer: This is a courtesy product compliments of the Land Development/Builder Services Division of �
Fidelity National TiUe. The information provi�ie�i is nnt�u�ranteed in any manner as tn accurac�� `o_
�
z
�
� o
0
� � � ' • • • "
� A�i m
�� n
0
U
"'`�'"°�"`°"" �"' 2004-018413
i ._ � _ OL2Sl1004 04:01. .il ���f 1'�
� 7►FTBa RECO&DIDTO AETIIRDi T0: �w CK■7 �m■a I REeD � �� l.
Gertz Conatruction Co., inc. t+s.00se.oas+i.00szao.oa-ro��.tte2oo
19200 SW 46th Avenue �IIIII�IIA �IUI�IIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIII IIII� /
oosass��x
i,�•Ry H.�.e�,oi�ao�w�u•..m.M.�a raaie�
'I1�alatin, OR 97062 a+aEa�anequunbu�r�rxM�^mo�+�a+MV,
onyen,w nnMr e�mM ti»t m�wehin ti�bumNa a ,
wltlr�wYnplMmdne0MA1n1h�CooYW ,;r�
t newa w ae caunh. (��_'`',�'�,�,,w,,. ., ✓
ls Until a change is requeeted all tax �nyRH.nwn,oMaarlFA,u�imu+tu+dTmtlor •' �
� statements shall be sent to the following i��n�ecwrereun�
�� a�ldresa: -- . --- --- —
a3 same as above
,. � WASHING�'ON COUNTY
Escrow No: 6500-14403[M�I ` ,` E�3�ap�� c�Ra7�
Order No: 279583
FEE PAfD ��
a3� �� os� - ��ox� Po�
(INDIVZDUAL or CORPORATION}
ELEANOR N. QUIMBY
\
� Grantor, conveys and warrants to �/�'}�J�¢`�`I,O�/¢4!/,���7�Df/���1���'�4�
M RENNETH E. GERTZ
O
� Grantee, the following described real property free of encumbrances except as apecifically
T set forth herein:
� (Continued)
NJ
�
This iastrument aill not nlloa uoe of the property described ia this iastrument ia violatioa
of eppliceble land use lsre and regulstioas. Selors •igaing or accaptiag thio inetrument,
the person acquiring fee title to the property �hould check vith the apgroprieta city or
� county plenniag department to verify approved use� snd to dstermine eny linite oa law�uits
� agninet farriaq or forest prnctices ns defiaed ia OA8 30.930.
�
�ENCONIDRANCES:
�
� 1. The premisea herein described are within and subject to the etatutory powera
�' including the power of asaeasment of Clean Water Servicea.
� (Continuedl
�
�
w
�The true conaideration for this conveyance is $230,000.00
<
�
� Dated �ebTU3TY 24� 2004 ; if a corporate grantor, it has caueed its name to
� be signed by order of its board of directors.
o �pl� -►�.1,
UEleanor N. Quimby
x
u
STATE OF OREGON, County of Washin�;ton )ss.
This instrument was acknowledged before me on February 24, , 2004
b�, Eleanor N. Quimby
This instrument was acknowledged before me on
by as
of
�)7'1. C �l.l�l�
Notary Public f Oregon OFFICIALSEAL
My cortGnission expires: NOTAH+VPUBI.�GOREGON
COMMISSION NO.338306
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JULY ib,200A
� ._ , IIIIIIII IIII(I�I11II illl III
Order No: 279583 _
LE(iAI. DE8C82PTION
PARCEL I:
The following real property situated in the City of Tigard, County of washington and
State of Oregon, described se follows, to-wit:
HEGINNING at a point in the center of Cour►ty Road No. 495, which point of beginning
bears South 0°53' Mest along the North and South center line of Section 3, Townahip
2 South, Range 1 West of the �iillamette Mleridiaa, a diatance of 2216.8 feet from the
one-quarter corner on the North liae of said Sectioa 3, and which point of beginning
bears North 0°53' East 462.0 feet fran aa iron pipe at the recognized center of said
Section 3; thence fraan the above described poiat of beginning &outh 0°53' �eat in
the center of said County Road No. 495, a distance of 126.9 feet; thence South
89°53' East 191.0 feet; thence North 0°53' Sast 134.7 feet to the center of said
County Road No. 495; thence South 87°46' west 191.2 feet to the place of beginning.
PARCSL II:
SEGINNING at a point in the center line of County Road No. 495 (Fonner Road), which
point is 2343.7 feet South 0°53' ➢Peat along the North and South ceater line of
Section 3, Township 2 South, Range 1 weat of the Nillamette Meridian, in the City of
Tigard, County of washington and State of oregon, frmn the North one-quarter corner
of said Section 3, which point is also the Southweat corner of that tract conveyed
to Joseph B. Filey, et ux, by Deed Sook 436, Page 530, ➢iashington County Deed
Records; thence continuing South 0°53' Nest 50 feet to the Northaest corner of that
tract conveyed to Fenimore F. iialrod, Jr., et ux, by Deed Book 374, Page 355; thence
South 89°53' Sast along the North line of the �Palrod tract, 191.0 feet to the
Northeast corner thereof; thence North 0"53' Sast 50 feet to the Southeast corner of
the aforementioned Filey tract; thence North 89°53' Weat along the South line of
said Filey tract, 191.0 feet to the point of beginning.
. �.�
II�IIIII IIIIIIII I II II I�'l lll
� � . �. 2eoa-�ea�a
• Eacumbrnaces, continued
2. The rights of the public in and to that portion of the premiaee herein
described lying within the limita of S.�. Fonner Street (COUaty Road No.
495) .
� �
Encumbrances
For Proposed Subdivisions
Fidelity National Title Company of Oregon
Land DevelopmendBuilder Services Division
1001 SW 5th Avenue, Suite 400 �
Portland, OR 97204 �
(503) 223-8338 L
�
Idbs@fnf.com =
Q
�
D�sclaimer: This is a courtesy product compliments of the Land Development/Builder Services Division of ~
m
Fidefity National Title. The information provided is not�uaranteed in anv manner as to accurar,��_ `o
�
z
�
�
i�
�
0
/
� � o
��n / � • � • L
;
m
� a
0
U
COf•ll•IECT 9b�� LAPM COMPRESSE❑
� - - Propertt� Data Selection Menu - -
-1 Ou�ner: GERTZ, KENNETH E
Prop ID : R470573 (Real Estatel (4698731 1920� SW 46TH AVE
Map Tax Lot : 2S13+�C-�230� TUALATIFa, OR 97062
Legal : ACRES . 63
Situs : 11480 SW FONP�ER Year Built : 1958
Lirring Area: 1098
Nameis] .
Code Area : 923. 74
Sale Info : 02/24�04 $23�, 000 2003 Roll I�alues
Deed Type : DW RMV Land S 147, 190 [+l
Instrument : 2004018413 RMV Improwements $ 56, 97� (+l
20a3 Tax Status �► Unpaid Taxes �- RMV Total $ 2e4, 160 (=l
Current Levied Taxes : 1 , 641 . 62 Total Exemptions S 13, 130
S�°a�ial Assessments . MS �aet Val ue S 191 ,�30
�-05 SB125 Taxes . M50 Assd Value $ 99, 99�
fll Alt Uisp (2l Primary f3l Secondary
[4l Land/Impr (5l Gen Appr ( . l More
Enter Option from Abo�e or <RET> to Exit : �
NUM 0 FU?( 23- 43
I
-r
a
� - - Property Data Selection Menu - -
- - Propert� Account Summary (R47�5731 - -
Propert�: R47�573 2S13AC-�23�0 023. 74 GERTZ, KEPJNETH E (4698731
ACRES . 63 19200 SW 46TH AVE
TUALATIIJ, OR 97�62
A1l Batch: Inq - Eff Oate Paid: 05I13/2�04
9. 2000. 86449 � 1 , 375. 13 1 ,333. 88 �41 .25> 1 , 333. 88 11f15f00
l0. 2��1 . 1892�8 � 1 ,474.�6 1 ,430.23 <44.23� 1 ,43�.23 11/15/01
il . 2002.239018 e 1 , 617. 12 1 ,423. 61 254.49 1 , b78. 10
Tax Oue Interest Annu�l Due Balance Due
2�02.239018 � 1 , 617. 12 193. 51 3�.96 224.47 224.47
Third Date Due Levied Tax Tax Due Interest Third �ue Balance Due
12. Current Taxes for bill 2��3.240949, Levied tax of 1 , 641 . 62
1/3 due No� 17 547.21 547.21 43. 78 59�. 99 815.46
- 2/3 due Feb 17 547.21 547.21 21 . 8Q 569. 1� 1, 384. 56
� 3/3 due May 17 54�.20 547.20 54�.20 1, 931 . �6
��� Cont ir�ued ���
frJ)ext Page (Plrevious [U#) Up [ . l More
Enter Option From Above, or <RET> or "X" to Exit : _
NUM 0 FDX 23- 51
- - Property Data Selection Menu - -
- - Property �ccount Summary (R4745731 - -
Property: R470573 2S13AC-02300 �23. 74 GERTZ, KENNETH E [4698731
ACRES . 63 1920� SW 46TH AVE
TUALATIPa, DR 97�62
All Batch: Inq - Eff Uate Paid: 05/13l20�4
Total Due: 1 ,641 .62 65. 67 1 , 707.29
��� End of Display �-��
r
fPlrevious [U#1 Up tT)op [ . l More
Enter Option From Abo�e, or <RET> or '3(" to Exit : �
NUM 0 FDX 23- 51
� �
B oundar Deeds
y
For Proposed Subdivisions
Fidelity National Title Company of Oregon
Land DevelopmendBuilder Services Division
1001 SW 5th Avenue, Suite 400 z
Portland, OR 97204 v
(503) 223-8338 L
Idbs@fnf.com �
<
v
Disclaimer: This is a courtesy product compliments of the Land Development/Builder Services Oivision of ~
m
Fideliry National Title. The information provided is not�uaranteed in any manner as to accuracy. `o
� �
1 � / � ry
-�� a
0
U
• t _ �
l,
� ' � STATE OF ORE(iON l
tQ RECORDING REQUESTED BY CouMy orwa�h�npten J 8S
r Rd�l(ty National 71tl�Company of Orepon I,�e
1� RY R��nptTr; r of Mwta-
ment and•.1�p n � ftv o County
� �RANYOR'S NAME Ciark tor,�' Id.�auh`yt�d� a Yrtity that
D�vld E.FlU�r and May Lynn h7iler thewlthl�'1n�trum+qto}� �}ea�lved
� snd rapOrtler�: ,'bQ�Sll pt, oeq1Lo} �ald
oounty.'' .y jl. ,.�.�t'�,;-'�. .:',. .� k
� ORANTEE'S NAME y . , , ,; _ : F
David E. Fill�r and Mery C, FIllar � , �, � �,
h �- '••;`:�!:•:;: +�,
�y :;.� � �..� . �i. .
SBND TAX S7ATFMENT6 T0: l�Uir(y R. Ffq�po �flnobr o}
� Mr.�nd Mn.Davld E. fllier a�����.�w�uon,E,c-
118Q0 SW Fonner Strset Dac :
Portland,OR 87223 981ZZ665
Recb; 219794 36.00
AIFilR RECORDINO NlTURN 70: �4�30/1998 04t 04:43p1p
Mr.and Mr�.Dav(d E.FUler �L�Q�
11640 SW Fonn�r Strpt ��
l`� Pord�nd,OA 87223 /
�
�
� STATUTORY BARGAIN and SALE QEED
� qevld E.Fiiter and Mery C,Fitfar whc acqufred tlile es May Lynn FElfer,as tenents by the entfrsty, Orentor,convey�
w Aavid E.FYbr�nd M�ryr C.FUler at tus�»ta hy ths snttr�t�r,Grantas,the following descrlbed real property,ettuetad
•� In the County of Weshinpton, 5tate of OreAon,
� SEE EXHIBiT ONH A77ACHED HERE70 AND MADE A PART HEREOF
�
Q
d
2
� TNIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW t1SE OF THE PROPERI'Y DESCHiBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VtOLA710N OF
� APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS A(�D REGULATIONS. BEFQkE SIGNtNG OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT THE
� PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TQ THE PROPEATY SHOULD�CHECK WITH THE APPRpPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERtFY APPRQVEO USES AND TO DEl'ERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUl7S AC,AINS7
FARMING OA FOREST PRACT[CES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930.
TIiE TRUE AND ACTUAL CONSIDERATION FOR THIS CONVEYANCE IS i0.00(See URS 93.030}
DATED: October 29, 1998 �,rw�dJ,�j�,�,
David E.Flller
C_,L��YXGv
Mary . Flller
OFF�a,�t.sFx
u�oa M cu►Y
c�i �i8.`�s
IfY ODI�I�MBION EXFMIE8INY PalDOf
STATE pF OREGON ,
COUNTV OF r(l�
7hfs inetrumerst was acknowledgad before me on
R 8i
by
� `�'�.
NOTAR BL1C FOR ORBGON
MY COMMJBSION EXpIRES: �
FORO-30B(R�V 2/Y8) BTATUTORV BAROAIN AND 6ALe DEED / �
1 -
; �
�wrewx.. tz•�una3r-ze
TM�pdN Ne.0012�Y19
�xHiB�r oN�
� A p�ro�l af I�nd In th�Southwut puarter of ths North���t quarter of SecUoa 3,Yownehlp 2 South,Rrnpe 1 W��c of
� th�Wlilam�th M�rldi�n,Wuhlnpton County,Orepon,ds�orlbad a�toilows;
h Commmclnp�t�n iron pEpe in th�canterlin�ot County Road No.49b tPonner Roed1 which polnt of b�pinning ba�n
; South 00°63'W�tt,2878.80 fset�lonp the North•South cenUrllna of S�otlon 3,Townthtp 2 SoutE�,R�e 1 W�st
of th�Wlll�m�tt�Merldlan,Wathlnpton County,Orepon,frem ths qu�rtsr cornar on tha north Iln�of reld 8�ctlon 3;
�a!d paint!e�loo knnwn so th�r�copnized csntsr of sald S�ction 3;thmce irom sald polnt ot b�pinninp Nonh 00°68'
Esst,176.10 tat alcnp safd Ncnh-South conterllrt�of 5sctlon 3 snd cent�rllns of e pnrdon of Faener Road to ths tru�
po{nt of baptnntnp of the percel herein describsd; thence cantlnulnp North 00° 63' E�tt, 110 f��t elo�p seid
Nurth•South cantarlins;thmce South 88°63'Esst,191.00 teet to an iron pipa;th�nca 5outh 00°53'Wast,110 feat
to en Iron rod;ffience North 88° 63'Weat, 19t.00 feet to the true polnt of baploninp, EXCEPT that porticn fyinD
wlihln Fonner Roed.
�
.
, .� ^ ' �
STATE OF OREdON �
Y '� County o/W��hinqton �
� -, .. : ;
� �, Ja►ry R, Har�scri.'D�reata► of Asasss-
� Robcrt V1�. Holmes, Grantur ment ane Yaaa�o�+ 4�4 �x'�+0 �""�Y
{�t� C�wk tor v�8id �d0.3!�ebY CKtNY thet
Fonner LI,C,Grantce tne wttr•m irre _ �a�,rocs+"°'d
and reC re �.�.��w�:p`f �sld
COUf1�f. • �. C�;�7�...t' - r;,• :.�^ '1
Until a change is requested, all ,* : �h
tax statements shall bc sent tc� the ����' � � ;�
,.;�.'• .`�_ ;'i.•'..
COIIOWITi�a(�dCCSS: WASHINOTON COUNTY 2001a1�Y66 �:��:�:` ,�n ; ,.�tor ot
�Taxation.Ex-
Fonner LLC I������������ � � ����C�
c/o Ms. Tracy Ann Bean Doc , 2 �
Rect; zSa�I7 152.00
2744 SW Scholls Fcrry�Road o�iz7�2ttic�� 04: 25:o5pm
Portland,OR 97221
TL a�� �
Af�er recording, retum to: --�'
� Fonner LLC� ��;'
WASHWGTON COUNTY
c/a l�1s. Tracy Ann Bcan :�: REAI PROPE�TY TRA��ISFER TAX
� 2744 SW Scholls Ferry Road ' `•.� � S �a`��i�' �'1'�'����
Portland,OR 97221 ti '�•. !�''�. FEE Pw0 aTE
a " ''
�
WARRANTY DFFD--STATUTORY FORM
�n' �
� 1
ROBERT W. HOLMES,Grantor,conveys and warrants to FONNER LLC, an Oregon
�� limited iiabilitycompany,Grantee,the fallowing-descrit�d rcal property("Property"), free of
encumbrances,except as specifically set forth in Schedule l, attached hereto and by reference
incorporated herein:
� � AlI the following property in Section 3,Township 2 South, Range 1 '•-Nest of the
V�'illamette Mer,dian,in Washington County, Qregon: Beginning at a point in the
center of County Road No. 495, which point of beginnin�bears South 0° 53'
� � West along the North and South centerline of Section 3,Township 2 South, Range
� 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, a distance of 221ti.8 feet and North S7° 46'
East 191.2 feet from the quarter corner on the North line of said Section 3,and
� which point of beginning beazs North 0° 53' East 462.�feet and North 87°46'
� � East 191.2 feet from an iron pipe at the recognized center of said Section 3; thence
F� from the abuve-described point of beginning South 0°53' West 241.7 feet; thence
� � South 89° 53' East 125.6 feet;thence North 0° 53' East 247.0 feet to a point in the
�— center of said County Road No. 495;thence South 87°46' West l 25,7 feet to the
� place of beginning.
�
The true consideration for this conveyance is One Hundred Twenty Thousand and Na/100
Dollars($120,040.00).
THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY QESCRIBED IN
THIS 1NSTRUMEN'� tN VIOLATION OF APPLICABI,E LAND USE LAWS AND
REGULATIONS. BEFURE SICNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMEMT,THE
Page I -WARRANTY t)EEiD—STATl1TOR1' FORM �
l _� K��SIO�W0007VC5SNVCSSNA20M1
, ! i
�- .
PERSON ACQU[RING FEE TITLF. TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD(`HECK WITH
THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY
APPROVED USES AND TO DE'�ERMINE ANY LIMITS UN LAWSUITS AGAtNST
FARMI�iG OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED iN ORS 30.430.
DATED this l9� day of July, 2001.
'L!1���P,�-
i R bert W. Holmes
� ium�pmnemiro�mm�nim�nn�muin
' STATE OF ��S� �P"d1�
) sra�osw..n��
)ss. E��r�'rH,�.r+�EVaI
Counry of �/7'6A� ) w�P4i"�nt Eq�s'!�'Z1'lOOt
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /Q � day of July,
2001,by Robert W. Holmes.
�
� / ���
Notary Pu lic for N
My commission expires: �-��'C't`
Page 2-V1�'ARRANT'DEED—STATIJTORY FORM
� K�143400�0000?VCSSNU(SSNA20M1
� \� • .
SCHEDULEI
1. Rights o!'the pubtic in and to any portion oCthe Properiy lying within!he boundaries of
raads flr highv�ays; and
2. 2401-2002 real property taxes,a tien not yet due and payable.
I
Schedule 1 to
Warranty Deed—Statutory Form �
r
Q.��
Q �
I
FACTSHEET
Project Name: Fonner Partition
Proposed Actions: 3-Lot Minor Land Partition
Ta�c Map: 2S 103AC
Tax Lot: 2300
Site Siz�: 0.63 acres (137,214 SF)
Address: 11480 SW Fonner Street
Location: North and east sides of SW Fonner Street across from SW Elton
Court.
Zoning: R-4.5
Applicant/Owner: Gertz Construction
Ken Gertz
19200 S W 46�' Avenue
Tualatin, OR 97062
503.692.3390
Applicant's Representative: SFA Design Group, LLC
Matthew L. Sprague
9020 SW Washington Square Dr, Suite 350
Portland, OR 97223
Ph: 503.641.8311 Fax: 503.643.7905
1
GENERAL INFORMATION:
The applicant is requesting preliminary approval of a 3-lot minor land partition. The
subject site, specifically identified as T� Lot 2300 of Ta�c Map 2S103AC, is
approximately 0.63 acres and is currently zoned R-4.5 (Residential, 7,500 square foot
minimum lot size) by the City of Tigard. The site has scattered trees throughout with the
largest relegated to the perimeters of the property and near the existing house.
Topographically, the site slopes downhill to the north and northwest averaging 6% with
the low point in the northwest corner.
VICINITY& SITE INFORMATION
Site Location
The site is located on the north and east sides of SW Fonner Street across from the SW
Elton Court intersection.
Existin��Uses
The property currently contains a single-family residence. The home will remain as
designated on lot 1.
Topo�raphy
The site slopes downhill to the northwest averaging 66% with the low point in the
northwest corner at 239 feet and a high point of 250 feet along the southern boundary of
the site.
Vegetation
The site contains some mature firs, cedars and deciduous trees generally surrounding the
existing house and the borders of the site. Other vegetation on-site is typical of urban
landscaping.
Surrounding Land Uses
Fonner Street lies adjacent to the north and west. The south boundary is adjacent to a
single family residence on 18,793 square feet and the property adjacent to the east
contains a single family residence on 28,214 square feet.
Trans�ortation
The closest bus routes are on Highway 99 (line #95) and SW Walnut where bus route 45
can be utilized. These routes are approximately 1 mile from the project site. Auto and
non-auto transportation facilities continue to develop in the local area with improvements
being made by the City on SW Gaarde Street. Recent developments to the east on
Fonner have also made frontage improvements. Existing developments to the south
contain full street innprovements. The transportation system in the immediate vicinity is
adequate for the added traffic of two new homes.
2
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed partition is a single-family residential development creating 3-lots from a
single parcel. Lot 1 is 8,088 square feet and has an existing house which will remain. Lot
2 is located south of the existing house and is 7,715 square feet in size. Lot 3 lies east of
and behind the existing house and will be 9,065 square feet. The average lot size is 8,289
square feet. The two newly created lots will be developed with single-family detached
homes.
Right-of-way for SW Fonner Street on both sides will be to a half-street width of 27-feet.
The corner will be dedicated with a 44-foot radius to allow for a future improvement with
a 55-foot radius along the curb face. No street improvements other than the dedication of
right-of-way is required for a minor land partition.
The existing home already has water service and the two new homes will obtain water
from the existing water lines in SW Fonner. An 8-inch sanitary line located in Fonner
north of the site will serve lots 1 and 3. Lot 2 will obtain sanitary sewer service by
connecting to the existing line in Fonner along the west boundary of the site. Both sewer
and water services will be installed as a part of the building permit process.
In accordance with the City's request at the pre-application conference, the applicant is
requesting a fee-in-lieu of constructing a storm water quality/detention facility. Creating
facilities for partitions would result in a huge number of facilities within Tigard that
would require maintenance at great cost when a regional facility could be constructed
downstream of development requiring much less maintenance. Lots 1 and 3 will have
storm laterals releasing into the roadside ditch in SW Fonner and lot 2 will have a lateral
connecting to the storm line in Fonner coming from Elton Court. The laterals will be
provided via the building permit process.
3
APPLICABLE DEYELOPMENT CODE CRITERIA
18.164.120
This section requires overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground
or a< <he election of�the developer; a fee in-lieu of under grounding can be paid at a rate of�$35
per lineal foot of street frontage.
RESPONSE: The developer is electing to pay a fee in lieu of undergrounding at the rate
currently designated in the Development Code. ($35.00/lineal footA)
18.390: QUASI-JUDICIAL DECISION MAKING
RESPONSE: The applicant is submitting a proposal in complete compliance with a11 relevant
code and Comprehensive Plan requirements. Included in the application is all the information
requested on the application form, along with this narrative addressing the appropriate criteria in
sufficient detail far review and action; the required fees; a list of all surrounding property
owners, as well as other potentially affected parties. The partition is consistent with the
underlying zoning requirements and all relevant City ordinances and standards.
18.420.050:LAND PARTITIONS
RESPONSE: The proposed partitions complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements
and regulations. Adequate public facilities are located within the Fonner Street right of way and
can serve the site. No improvements are required with this partition however if the City tinds
that a public facility is required, it will be built to City and or applicable agency standards.
All of the proposed lots meet the requirements of 18.420.OSO.A.4. The minimum widths of the
building envelope area meet the lot requirement of the R-4.5 zoning district. T'he lot areas area
as required by the R-4.5 district and not flag lot is proposed. Each lot has more than 15-feet of
street frontage. The builder will be responsible for meeting the setback requirements. The
application has established building envelopes within which the homes must be constructed. No
accessways are proposed and therefore no screening is necessary. A fire hydrant will not be
necessary due to accessway requirements as an accessway is not proposed. No common
driveways are proposed that would require a reciprocal easement.
The partition does not contain nor is adjacent to a 100-year floodplain and no variance to the
standards is required ar proposed.
I8.510:R-4.5 SINGLE FAMIL Y RESIDENTIAL
RESPONSE: The property is currently zoned R-4.S by the City of Tigard. The purpose of the
R-4.5 Land Use designation is to establish sites for single family detached and attached units for
4
-�
medium density residential developments. The proposed detached single-family homes are
permitted outright per Table 18.510.1.
18.510.2:DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES
RESPONSE: The proposed development site complies with the dimensional requirements as
laid out in Table 18.510.2, specifically and shown on the submitted plans.
Required Setbacks Other Req_uirements
Front Yard 20 feet Average Lot Size: 7,500 square feet.
Side Yard 5 feet Lot Width: 50 feet
Street Side 15 feet Height: 30 feet
Rear Yard 15 feet
Garage 20 feet
The proposed subdivision will comply with all of these development standards. Per Section
18.430.020(D), lot averaging is allowable provided no lots are less than 80%of the minimum lot
size of the underiying district. In this case, the minimum lot size allowed would be 6,000 square
feet. The smallest proposed lot is 7,715 squaze feet. "I'he project's average lot size is 8,289 square
feet.
18.705:ACCESS/EGRESS& CIRCULATION
RESPONSE: Vehicular Access: As required under section 18.705.030, all proposed lots have
direct access to a public or private street. Curb cuts will be in accordance with Section
18.810.�30.N and each lot will have a single driveway at least 15 feet wide. Lot 1 will maintain
its driveway facing west and a new driveway will be constructed for lot 2 facing the same
direction. I,ot 3 will have a north facing driveway located just east of center to go between some
mature trees.
18.715:DENSITY COMPUTATIONS
RESPONSE: According to the Residential Density Calculation provisions within the code, the
number of dwelling units permitted on this site can be calculated by dividing the net area by the
minimum lot size, which in this case is 7,500 square feet. The net area, in this development, is
derived by subtracting the public right-of-way and private street tract from the gross acreage.
The density computations for Hillside Estates are as follows:
Net Area Calculation For Subdivision Plat
Gross square feet 27,486 square feet (0.63 acres)
Minus right-of-ways 2,618 square feet
5
,
..�. - �
Equals Net Area subtotal 24,868 square feet/7,500 square feet= 3.31 dwellings
Minimum Dwelling Units Required: 3.31 X .80= 2.65 units
Total Units Proposed: 3
I8.725: ENVIR�NMENTAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
RESPONSE: The applicant understands that compliance with state, federal, and local
environmental regulations are the continuing obligation of the property owner, and will abide by
the applicable standards.
18J45.040:LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING
RESPONSE: Street trees will be provided in accordance with this section on the public streets.
The specific standards listed in Section 18.745.045C shall dictate the spacing, size, as well as
other specifications inherent to planting of street trees(see Tree Removal Plan). As the adjacent
properties are located in the same zoning district, no screening or buffering is required
18.755 MIXED SOLID WASTE/RECYCLING STORAGE
RESPONSE: Waste/recyclables management will function in the same manner as any other
single-family detached residential development with curbside service.
I8.765: OFF-STREET PARKING
RESPONSE: Each lot will have a minimum of two off-street parking spaces to serve the
detached single-family residential homes.
18.7$0:SIGNS
RESPOI�ISE: No signage is proposed with this partition.
18.790: TREE REMOVAL
Tree plan requirements
RESPONSE: A tree removal plan has been developed and submitted for City review. A by a
certified arborist rcviewed the site, including the localion, size and species of all existing trees.
His report is attached. According to the report there are 26 trees greater than 12 inches on the
6
site. 2 of them are hazardous trees and should be removed whether development occurs or not.
This brings the total healthy trees greater than 12 inches to 24. Of the 24-trees the applicant is
proposing to remove 5 or 21%. The applicant has developed a tree removal plan(sheet 3). The
plan identifies individual trees for removal or retention. The plan illustrates the proposed
building envelopes of the homes on each of the lots. Only those trees impacted by the proposed
building envelopes and driveways are designated for removal. The tree protection standards
proposed include fencing, mulching, proper equipment storage, soil protection, responsible
excavation and quality assurance by the project arborist.
Because the applicant is not proposing to remove more than 25%of the trees greater than 12
inches, no mitigation is required.
18.795: VISUAL CLEARANCE AREAS
RESPONSE: Any future landscaping will be consistent with this section. The corner on which
the site is located will not see additional landscaping or fencing that would impact the visual
clearance areas.
18.810:STREET& UTILITYIMPROVEMENT STANDARDS
RESPONSE:
Streets: SW Fonner in fronting the site is currently paved to a width of approximately 20-feet.
The City stated at the pre application conference that frontage improvements would not be
required as a part of this partition in accordance with 18.810.030.A_5. The applicant is however
dedicating 7 feet of right-of-way. This dedication will result in a half-street right-of-way of 27
feet in width meeting the Neighborhood Route Standard. The proposed layout will provide
direct access to homes on the site from SW Fonner.
No opportunity exists to extend streets through the site as adjacent parcels are mostly developed.
Sanitary Sewer: Sanitary sewer service is currently available from existing and adequate line
both north and west of the site in the Fonner Street right-of-way. The existing home on lot 1 and
a new home on lot 3 will connect to the line to the north. Lot 2 will connect to the line to the
west. Individual laterals will be hooked up as a part of the building permit process.
Surface Water Run-off: The City of Tigard is requesting the applicant pay a fee-in-lieu of
constructing a storm water facility. Lots 1 and 3 will have laterals for drainage to the existing
ditch along the north edge of the site in the Fonner Street right-of-way. Lot 2 will connect a
lateral to the existing line in Fonner west of the site extended as a part of development across the
street. The laterals will be installed as a part of the building permit process.
Domestic Water:
7
�
I� ,�1 a
Adequate domestic water will be provided to the site by extending new laterals to the two new
homes from the existing line in SW Fonner Street. The laterals and meters will be installed as a
part of the building permit process.
18.810.040: BLOCKS
A. Block Design.
No opportunity exists to create a block pattern with development of streets as a part of
this project. The adjacent properties are developed to an intensity which discourages the
creation of new streets.
SUMMARY
The proposed Development complies with all applicable elements of the Comprehensive Plan,
and Development Code. The proper steps have been taken to ensure compatibility with the
established neighborhood character within the City boundaries. Adequate public facilities and
services exist to serve the development and all improvements as necessary will be constructed to
City and other applicable standards.
8
�
IMPACT STATEMENT & ACCESS MANAGEMENT
For The
Fonner Partition
IMPACT STATEMENT
Purpose
The purpose of the Impact Study is to review existing public facilities and address any
proposed modifications that will help mitigate the proportionate project impacts that will
likely occur as a result of development.
All necessary facilities for serving this site are currently in place within the public right-
of-way in SW Fonner Street.No new facilities will be constructed on site or are
necessary. The transportation, storm water, sanitary, water and other private utility
systems are all available and adequate in the immediate vicinity of the subject property.
Transportation Svstem
SW Fonner Street is classified as Neighborhood Route in the Transportation Plan. This
project is not required to complete half street improvements as a partition. The proposed
layout will provide access to homes on the site to SW Fonner Street.
The existing streets in the vicinity are currently adequate for the addition of two new
homes. Improvements are being made on SW Gaarde by the City of Tigard which will
help facilitate traffic coming and leaving the neighborhood.
The Tri-Met#45 Garden Home route is available at SW Tiedeman and SW Walnut
Avenue and Tri-Met#95 is available on Highway 99. T'hese service lines are
approximately 2/3 mile from the project site.
Draina�e Svstems
No storm drainage improvements are necessary as a part of this project. The City is
requesting a fee-in-lieu of a stonnwater facility. Lots 1 and 3 will have laterals installed
as a part of the building permit process directing stormwater to the roadside ditch in the
northern right-of-way. Lot 2 will have a lateral installed as a part of the building permit
process directing water to the existing manhole in SW Fonner to the west.
Water Systems
There is an existing water line in SW Fonner Street. The individual lots will connect to
this line, which will supply more than adequate flow and pressure for the proposed
domestic and fire flows to the housing units.
B:\Land Projects 20(�U26-O011word\Narrative\1261mpact Statement.doc
1
.
I
Sanitarv Sewer Svstem
Sanitary sewer service is available from the existing lines in SW Fonner to the north and
west of the site. The project will utilize this existing system to serve this site. Lot 1 and
3 will connect to the existing line to the north with laterals via the building permit
approval process. Likewise Lot 2 will connect to the existing manhole to the west.
Noise Impacts
No negative noise impacts will result from this project. Noise generated would be typical
of a small single-family neighborhood.
Parks System
Jack Park and Woodard Park are in the vicinity (1 mile) of the project site. In addition,
there is an existing bike path that can be accessed on SW 115�'avenue that extends west
and east to SW Walnut Street. These parks are adequate to serve the proposed addition
of 2 single-family lots.
ACCESS MANAGEMENT
Access Report
The proposed driveway connections to SW Fonner are the only new"connections"
proposed. The driveways for lots 2 and 3 have been located approximately 120 feet from
the Fonner corner. The existing driveway for lot 1 is currently located on the south side
of the house facing west. This is the best location for this driveway as it is as far south of
the Fonner corner as it can be located. The driveway locations for the existing and new
homes are safe and adequate sight distance exists at their location to provide proper
ingress and egress for the residents.
SW Fonner is a Neighborhood Route and therefore not bound by the 200-foot separation
required on collector streets or 600-foot separation on arterials. No local streets are
proposed that would cause conflict with local street spacing along a local street.
Brent Fitch, PE
Project Engineer
B:\Land Projects 2004U26-OOI1worJlNarrative11261mpact Statement.doc
Apr_07-04 06: 27 Ger Offices 50; 92 5433 P.O1
bj124f2@64 23:18 5036s_ . 305 SFA DESIGN GR�uP PAGE 02
i , 1
1, ,t
� �, i,.' ��,� �;,;;�,- - ,! , �� � . F��� � 3
\���1 �, �C =� - . , ,`� !I; '� 1
�i �1�W�r ` 1CGS ''� I i .
Uur commihncnt ix cl , i MAR 2 6 2004�11 ��1$$P�(',�jul� S��Aggp,ggmAnt
�U
JufiSdiCtipn , Y _ -.:_.' D� 3•z�0 4
Map 8 Tax Lot 2 s 1 0 3 w Te. �30o Owner _ K�a G� �xT Z.
Sit�Addi�ess I\4 EA° sar.� Fe ►�s�s sT
'T�4w�t��o� 9�z�3 Cnntact L92od Sv� 4�''" �ao�
Proposecl qc}ivify . � Address `T'u�4r�►T�w!� P/� 47o b-z
3• t.n� T�TION
Phbne S03�sp 4 2- 3 p
oASdal use only b+bw dNS Ar�e
Y Iv NA Y N NA
� � � Se►�sitiv�e Area Composite Map Stormwater Infrastructure maps
Map#_,�,.Sl l.vf.1 � ❑ � QS#_ v �3/ 8
❑ ❑ � S���adopted studies or maps � ❑ � Other
S�� 2Ad.Z u.er;C�� O��fTf1
��
ga�on 1 rerfew of the above lnformattnn and the requirementg ot Clean Wat�r
Services Deslgn and Constn,�ction 9tandards Resolutlon and Ord�r No. Q4-9:
� �nsit�►e ar�s po�entially extst on slte or withln 200'of th�slte.THE APPLlCANT
MU9T PERFORM A SiTE CERTIFICATION PRIOR TO ISSUANC� Q�A SERVICE
PROVIDER LE77EIt OR STORMWATER CONNECTION pERMIT. If Sensitiv�Areas
exlst on the site or wKhln 2p0 feet on adjacent properties,� Nataral Resources
��eM RePwt may also be required.
� StMsitive areas da not appear to exigt bn sfte or withln 20Q'af the s�te. This pre-
screenlRg sete assessmQnt does NOT'ellrnfnate the need to evs�luate and protect
water qualtty senslthre areas i�they ar�subaequerrt�y dlscavered on your
property. NO FURTHER SITE ASSESSMENI'pR SERVICE IPROVlDER L.ETTER IS
REQUIREp, THIg FORM W{LL SERV�qS AUTHORIZATION TO tS3UE A
STORMWAT�R CONNECTION PERMtT.
[� The propased activtty doea not meet the definition af devefopmerrt. NO SITE
A3SESSNlENT OR SERVICE PROVlpER LElTER IS REQUIRED.
�mments:
e , �r c �
'c• �c i-"6. e
�� rr
� °'' �"a s�r P.c.S���
.. .'! o � �j
e
Rev�ew�a By: � �� � .-1 �- � na�:
4Z,f �J��S,�
Returned to Appliaant
Mo:l�Fax Cau�rler
naee ���,%o � _By-�
155 N Firsf Avanue.Suite 27Q�Hlllsboro.Oregort 87124
Phone� (503)6/6-3553.Fex' ('303)846�325.www.clen�wnter�crvicav.orR
�
e, v c�
��
�
�
. y° �
a
� � ��� �W,�y�x�o� , d� � �
���� �"'
�¢ Ann � e -�
� ack Parkl � A - st�r Sh�ropo Ct �� ���.$
�i � , � � l9Y+Wel��t 5?,��_,.__,^-, o ����
�' �' $ �N rvp� � � 5w Erral ;�s�
..._.
� +
,.... �
5' o ��'a ,� Q� �6�
' _ . �Bw Mi}e�4a Ct �,r' � 1 �, . � �
.� Sw Fo ' �� g �
_ � ._�.._„____...--,:;- � �1' er 31.�.
. 3 _ - -- � n n �
_ _-
� S.W. FONNER ST. � ° � _ __ _�A��_� � }� s
_ � _ �. Sw Ub?9en G1
Z N _ ;-'_ - __ __ _ � �r,' sw+semea 6t � �, � Q�a,
, � _ , _. � � y
___
` . __ ___ --
__l _ � � g a...
_._. � ''��� �r,4 �r Marion 6t
�
I _........_ __.....__ .. ,.,.. s
__ _.. ���
. ' a
! j i g X N � ---- �''�.°.d+� Stix HDibw Ln ;A �
� -------— �
W —� �_-i------ _. ���
, E P -____..� -
� �- ---
� ------------------ � _.__-.2 4" D I— �. — -
I '
; EP ____ r�
�� Sw Clu�t��� ��
� --- -� ` __ �' _� ';`� �` � �
roek�
, �- -- ,�
__ n ' �
� _ — -- - ---- �
� W � � --1- _, �_ -�6 C,---- _ � ' __ v o 1-
_._..__ - _ -_-._ •� �,
; -- --�— ---- — ———�— � �n
, -' - -- -- -- --�__-__-- o ' o �r V Dr al �Rv Uhwmoum Gt
' �^ �-- -�VJ-' _-6,� C� - - -- -- -- � � 4 Rns� tsta �� �
`.t` I �� � -- - -- `- 72.11� -- '- 1 Z
' > 50.49' � V[CIl�1lTY MAP
� ' i /� � NT�.
', I � r����' �=� ' � PROPOSED ROW DEDICATION a
a. jj�ro 0�0 I + A�.[CANT / OWI�i� n- n.
, � w � I �Y G�7Z Q
�0.00 � � i �
EXISTING ROW �/� ` ' ------------i � 1L�AiATIR,�AR� Z
I �------ (Al��2-S#� F (� �
� �
� i �
, /
' 15, � � __-�!_....-1U.O' �___ _-_ � L------- _
EP TO C � i � -----i � �� W
� I , � � �
, 20.00' 27.00' o I i i ( ��
R' �Qt,��g DRIVB
�-- ` � '� Ex. woou � � � i S�11TB.� AQR7IArIDl�R
PROPO�ED R01N� ,� � � i � �EC4� � i i � (�611,H�1/FAX(,'�6�C�79ClS
� � I ,�/ ,J 1 in i i CYkVTACf AlATf S�PRA(1[1B
I • (
[� "' � i ,,�� 8�088 SF � �I i 3 i ARBORlST'
� � � �� � i�n �.a' �_.....__�_...._ �� , 9�065 5F i i
� HALSIBALIS AR9QRJLULIURB OOAS[1LT�N1B DVC
� w I I I� �r �`� u! I ' i i I 7iUTA7]1K OR 9i0R
:�t.� � ( i i I C�12f5-i�
I Z I � � _�_ i i � �� OONfAL7'LiiVID I�i�LSlBAD
� � � ' 16.1' ' ' � � � r+�l
O __. 3j•�.._ ( '; EXISTING RESIDENCE ��� j � S��R'
� r� ' _`�^'� o TO RFMAIN ', ��` 1 �I 91r8 W�.S A�A�S�.
� F+1 1 ,, o0 �
' � i _ EY.. PONC? I � `�\ � �� �FR�57R�I7 m
' � I # I �----- :.x�.o' ----� i ���`\ i ' GY,yVTAC�7CaM$�VHA(1�
�_ ( _- _-- -- M
� + � �-- -_--I--- -- -- `\�. �
�
� � ��.�� � I I �
I •� 1 � �18 ARBA
I {�>- �• �� i '"!E�
i � \�`. � I
, � A�FRV�OUS ARFA
; t � --------- � �. � � ,�os -m.
!� j � �------ ---------------�� � �� I 1 �
i ( � � , �
�. �
I � � `. 9 �, i I WG'I'L0��1 0
� I �� �.� �� � s�w�c��c �
� � i � �� �`` � I na�fr
� I �♦
+L — ------- ,_... ..._ ...�L.._ I�::� � � �` ,� �v � GRAPHIC SCALE I
�, � I I i 2 ���� �� � � �
`i' i .� I a �
: � i ; � 7,715 SF �� �°""�' � � Ee
. ♦` I 7 lnon. �o K 'I �� �
' ' - � m ���
. � , �
_ „� ►► � � � � ��. . � �� m m o
� � � i � � '`•, '� � i e�n�Y pur�av ruiv � � � � �
i I ' � � _�`., �� i a z �n�ro oormcna�s erwx � � �
,Ic- �.o' -- -- �---_�---�_----_�----_�6.4.Qa_----_�----__--- -- -- -- --� � 3 �R�ovu,i � .- � �
UIIIIfY PUN �,
4 AFRIAL�ii
rao,�cT ro�
N0. 164G1
PROPOSED ROW DEDICATION T''� """10
. �� �^�
I ' �� ���€
__._._.____ ------------' ���
_. �
_ -�-.�-- - - --.._..,__—_—�_ ��������
_._.._....
_ .._...__...__---._. ... _.. _ -
_ , ��y�,,�6 ��O �S ��§�
i ry,'� 'L� - : _ _ _ __ __ __ 3s�"a
-c� — _ _ -
S.W. FONNER ST.', __ _._ LLE � �
\ � �' :� - �-- = _ _ �
1
, -— _"_
__.� — -
Sl_._.----- .�� R
_____---{i � �cy 111� S
� - � _�'t
---E� ._.. _�__�.- _ !- __-i;
\� 4 __. .__. . t�}�il(jJ': _- �
----------- �
;{:_. ___....._i ..... ._--...___-.- -- .
_. _._...
__.. _. �.
_ _.; ;.
__._..._... i I
� _,
�
� C UITCH � � � �
EP
, ` ____.
__.._---E�'s:.._-- ---y,�,��-' � - `� - _ _ �1
:,�
--*-= ` ,t�- � � kl.�-.�l �� _�
u�s--
:
I � -4V-- -- _.__.__ } � , � _ Cf_-- ��=_ _- _�_-_
s�. _ -°-�' _ __ �
T „ - _ �S,- ._<,. . � , _� _ __�- I -
,
' ` � --N 4P�-� C_.:..Ej _ _._ - - =.-�;M,�:_ .-�`�,-� /��t� 7p�V� 3�o �G
; ! . . -- a��--.. �..�-__._��.�.��:=�1�"'� � 'R ..,.. �3 yqy�',1+�,�^ CY'� <<� _
/ � �
' a �,, .. ,;'.i�._ -- ' '�� '��7 _ L, ("-�.1 �(7"/ .'��\'� _�j •:' � f�( •='�����.
g ��� d� _ �_ I
,
, „
� .
�
� ��� � � � � � �
� � , � ,- � — '� •.,� 'i, '� - !. �'�/�� _
� - � �
i /'r /;`"�� a
`� � _� ,_.r � (���Y , J r'_ � � i
� )
� �,�; 309 i � n 248
� I i \ �o� /;. ��,�.�1` p�,� >�/� � 310 s� � `-�.a �
,L �' � '� r�, •>,� �, � � �,�� �e �
' � � � ,°' � i� �� 106 `��� �w ' 247 �a\\�� ��h' �
, , �L '���, �? , , �� ... �f °- ''`�� " '�
! � � ' , , '! �-_5' WOOD ' 30�5 ,7 y�,,�246 i �I
� . �.� .�
� ' � � ,,.._- t Os � �� ��� ' f"ENCE �� 30 ,,-,;�./ � I� _4' �,;;�i� �
�
� I , ;;;���� , : ; � ,�' �V ��, � ��3D6 +� �'�
; , � .. ''' -
. .. � � �a�.,. ,�` I (1 �
! ,'\ `\�: - Y �
; I ��� ��� �°r,�� � �'20.0' "!- �� ---�- �i �
I �, �' ,= Z
a: I �
} ✓ I , toa _. \ ,. � ; �;
;
,
L f ��; ,,,: _� , ,t �; T!:M
;
� �.1 �'. ""'`� � .� N i EX. WOC1D `L° ' ; '� W
�y Q e DEC!< � r �.. ____ ��o
' -�A� 1�� ��" �� � u,�
• �- �� �/�
� � � - .��� �� r � �!��9:
�/] � � � / 1 ° l� �i�
�e� � 103 2.9'� ' - j% � `��/`�,
I a `, _C o / / 245� , ;..
;
i r, I I�-1L3� ! I� ...�. ad i � �,� —....
, ; -
_. .-
� �. , i � GM EA� /� `
� . _
i -�-.._ � '� ', } � �'' � , -' __ — ,/
,
,
i r: l
� 1 , , _ �
� Z = - � n �� ,s., �� / , `��i
`,33.7' EXISTING RESIDENCE , i �
� � I � _.__r -- o TO REFAAIN �� 1 �, , i�, /', _ �. — —245—/ �, .. � >`I
�
t3 I �,, .;•� � , [X. POND �f � /� Y 5' 4900D/ ' ��
,�
1 ' "
I , • I J �.. ! FFNCE-�- I -- __.
� i -. '- _ 39 0' YF,, ' � � �..;"1 ,,.
l � � "��._L-' � � ��� � � '�� � I
� ��' � ��� , !ih� 110 r,,, 303 250 'a�/ � _ . -__ ---�� � W m
� � I .
-� .
'�"a �E,�p� � � �' ''' .��.� �:. 249 i y�uN'f
� hihp,�F, �� � ,� �, � , � ���� 251 ' ;y ; 1�
, }
-�,�`�'`� I I I 4*, � s 4� _ t.��f:A� b
. e� . _ �..�, <' �
--..�+� �� � `� e , � T� _ �� �O
�� �
142 ?�?4�/ . C _ 04� �1 ��' T� ;z
;�
' � H e Mt ;� �/'�_
� - � EX. I�:K i�
.,
.,. •� __
_; �' <<):K �., , !;, c f i/�`.. 3 E /P � �
;. ,
i '
� ,
� � / ,/
, -,�
n;`..',' w I ,:,:Ty�, - ' � R�1W - - -- �1' `
__ �...�- ,;
� � �
/ '� q ...._.. . _.. : � . �
.T:,��'� �� � i � .. � ,; -�tl� -� ❑� � _.
_� - �"� i �L ,�1 �r ��i%; C:: ' _..__ i
� - _ 244 ��x � o
,_ - ' --•- 305 " ' ,.;,��,� � �
p I
i �
O I / /
:,�a ��
�I `' p !ii #ifi I�, '�
, ' � � _ _- 242 � _ 1
/�,
� � ;�ri�"�� � „`;�� � ��I
,
.
243
; , �__ - - - ' �
, , _�_ _
_-c� � �� - 5� vroo� . � ' o o a � �
1 � ;TOE � FFNCE : _.� 240 'I �
�
� �;. ;� �I, I
, _.._ I
LEGEND 1 , �_ _ ,- �� `' : �� _ > m �
o � .._. ,��• m
o- , � � ._--�- .
. ; ;.
�`-�i i � 241 _ - - I _ --
_ __ �� w, _.__.__ _ � _
---—--- osirc ra�w�er � r1 ` � _-__ --_o
� -••._ -� °_ -- - _- - - _� .
. :.. ��i 1•O�IIOR � .-. _ .,_. . _. .. � t.. w ._ "` n .. ..,� �'� rr. .;J`i.,,,a a a� �S
u
:r � He��cs 4z w -- -- i- ,� r — - - -.._,�,--�; - � »i:oo z � � � �
,� ,
__---- _ _ .
o��� � ' ' �
� �..�;!��,��. , _�
cie�Mn ur °
� � pi�IpfYfOMY�lplll[ GRAPHIC SCALE x � N � �
(��Ii f10�1 AW IK �
�.� �fIC�b 1�
raaECr ��a+
E��R f�1� {A RlT) N0. 1�00�
i�n- w n
T1PE flMN10
._—l� ' . . . . -
. �a �
a� � �
_. _ _ . , _ _ _ LEGEND � �@?�
. �� ��,�g
_ -
' CONNECT SS LATERAL z_ ..
INTO EX. SS MH � ___ ; , -- __ _ _�w._-_ o�ra� �° i�=�
. . --__ --
. � _ / _ __ .; � _ � =:- ,: l_r� —ws �sww�►�:a LL� ��d
w�
� _-._ - 7� __ � _. ,: . , ,; , oewoc�aa��er � �
�
_ ...._ er
S W FONNE
� ',
� ;_,17E-SD-I�ILATERALS fNTO __ _ _ . � TlE SO LATERALS INTO N N$TALC' C(�L`1'I�RT`� `, ; � '• �l m.c�aa.ff �
; _...
_...
- - --- --' i EX. DITi H. r EX. DITCH. � '
; . - �AL9119
; " ' d` —EP-- �
� I E P � `_..� --�V"' — '�- �E A E RiCIN
� n
; I . ...'j.iri-__�_ ....__A — �1�- �{�a_. � ... ---�� � 7 �.-�'_' ""``._._ �Al��
4" D I-- _
; _ - ._ - __ .____
� _
T____�l;!__- -�'---__....�- - --�o-. .__ _.. ._ �-- °— - __ J�" __ �
l� ---- — -
�_ „_ ... _. . __ _ , _ _ � -- o �----� nna�eo�uaro anoa�
� i —1�--- �-5 -C-i . ._____ _ _ - - + J �ill�� - � �
� � CI--- -
,
-� t a. '
- _ , ��� r
_ ----
�� �� .r'� �X ,�.... �� ��ii�� �� , � �� � �
-^---
�-� _ _ . -
_
,.I � �.- ,=� .-�" � � � ��� 72 �1�
�,R .
,,.. ' ,a�� � �
; i i
; ' - � ,
� , : � a:� ,-- ,�.,� 3fl;. i� � �.N :
__ . ��;�_. `# 248
� _- � �
- �
� �� . �. ���
; i � .cS' � �'� ` � . , / � , �,:,�..��j. , o ,�
� ,s,>��,
6� ��\� ; � ��' �\. ���1E� � `� �j°� � ' �PROPOSED ROW DEDICAl10N
�C � � �
� � . .----�-----
� i fG' Q ���fif ^d' 247
L- \ �
cp
�' / �• YJ I
, 1� 106 � _ __ _ .
� � i ; tiT \ i ° 30 � 1NSTALL # �'. � T��L TA6LE �
ti � �
; - .. , i
� � � � # � � � 307WATER.�. � I � NO fRUNh SILE TYPE � DRIP
� �' � � f� � 246�� -- - -
;, � �,�- � -3�v+�E _._..
' ;�° _ ; ,- � 101 �0'` � CONIFEROU � �
, � � w:- � � __ � S 30 ...
: !� # 105 ---��-i— i : � ��F i ' I- 102 �a�'��...._. DECIDUOUS ,�5;
/ - -- -.... .__
, i� , '2�.0' , , ------ �`��. �-------------i ; 1U3 17 DECI�UOUS_ 40 _ �
� ,, �I I . � � � 104 1__ 3r___ CONIFEROU5 20 O
_� 104 �, ' � ' I I f �05 - -- 35' CONIFEROUS 35
✓
, � � - _ — —._. __.
, �
� I ` � ; � __I 1Q6 63T CONIFEROUS 55' �
: L .� , , N EX. w00D I ' i ,° _ .._...- i � 107 T H DFCIDUOUS 25�_,
_ , DEGK � i - - _ � � 108 TWIN 20'r CONIFEROUS 4�
• - . � � � 109 —37 CONIFEROUS 50_._� W
� I � , � --� 8,088 SF ,__ %�I ; ;� ' ' ' i�0 3z� ._ c01VIFEROl1S aa_ �
! i ,-�� � j?<� `,i` rn� � 9�065 SF 2ao 3 t�� c o N i r[�o u s �>o __
n � �..; � � � -- ;,�� � 2 4 1 23 C O N I F E R O U S 4 0
� � � I ` I� `° ���� j � 245 242 22' CONI�i.f2011S 4;i'�
w ,'� ' ` ,, 2 4 3 1 3 COPJIFEROUS 15 �
I `'� ' ` _� I ', . ' i � I 244-- -- 30 CONIfEROUS_ 4(� �
� � �..,.. ._. _ ,, , � i i � � 245 23 CONIFERQUS 3C�
Z „ � 16.1' i �� � i M� � 246 39" CONIFEROUS 6C' '
33 7' w , EY.ISTING RFSIDENCF ', �
I w I I -� _... _. _ , . I `. � _ i r�l -- 47_ 25 CONIFEROUS 30' I
;.,_
+ o TO REi�hAIN � ♦ _."45- � �" I � � � � �'�
� � 1 ,: . � , f.X °0"�^ I .� __ __ __ ,_ � � 248 38_ CONIFEROU,_ �0' _�
� � t - : ' i `� i Z 249_ 17° CONI�EROUS 30� i
I � � ( � � � � � � �_sa,.ri�._: r '� � 39.0' � � i��� ��� � �� 250 33' CONIFEROUS 4(�
� � _... \ V l t�`.:- � ----- _,_� .:..:_ �__J # 25 � <. ;_ ____ -i I 251 20° CONIFEROUS 35
(/] f fi -_ � _..=__� ? __ �,�� ,r �.` __ _. i 303 TWIN 30" CONIFtROUS 3J' I
CONNECT SS LATERAL �--�, � � �`r� �,`�'���' 249 �• � � 304 19" coNirErous 30'__
, ,__
INTO EX. SS MH �� ' 25� • �{�� � �`. i i 305 22" CONIFEROU5 �`�' m
' I � � �� ` --
' - a _ �a , ` `. � 306 18" COMFEROUS �5'
' , 4 ' r�� � <rg�. , \ �� _ _ j I ' 307 19" CQNIFEROU� 1','
CONNECT SD LATERAL—�� � �! ' _',__;'' � `�'�`��' ��?'� ' �� � �
��<4" Z� , r
� �� _ � , �t � , �� '�' �, ' � f � � � i08 8 � CONIFEROUS �5� a
-- -- �r------- �. . � �� � � ---- �
INTO EX. SD MH ��.� S �� i �'110� " ' ,: '�`�� __ � .� - - --- _- -
,� � � � � 3os � CONIFERQUS , 1
I [�, � - � ~\ i 310 21" CONIFFFOUS 3Q. I
I � � - ��- i `��, , `. �.9 � i ,
� , # i I �1' ,5., COI��FERO�� ic
lE� � 1. � � i� � ��� � � ��� !� 1; �:
�IC,, i/�.� � � �_ �`.5O4
`. / . • 244 � i _,. ,, � ,;c�i F�� � ��'
' -� ____. '__._ _�y__ ( :.; � , � ` `� i � " - -- - �
1 t_��...� � -' _. V
�...�..s�.. `�' f � _,,, �� �� � <
�I e ��"� � � � � � .5 V� ♦ � 'i/�� � a
c . , � I
swe rw�w.a.w w.oc � -. ' i Z \ �: ,,
a,.b�,�.� i „t,- i . �j � �
��....��..� i i , ' � ,,, 7,71 S SF `.. ' „��: � �
_�« � `
��'� � i �_,,&,���� �� # 24� � � h��;'�'kC�;=
i � .
��a� + � I - �f � � � � �
i NSTALL ��� �,� � � `. I
_.�o.
� i� � ; WATER i_ ��� ��r�� 240� �,� � o o � �
-��;, �, '� SERVICE�---------- -------------------------------------------�2 `� i
� ��_� • � �
.��,�... ���:
, �-_.� �� � # a-�
_ _��a_ �I
��.._._e p_ _.� �_ _ - me m °
�,.��a�. , _ -- -- -- -- -- --
��
- - - - -- --- - - -
(Rf yh ,�A"„�„� ; __ - - __ _ _ _ __ : ,_- _ GRAPHIC SCALE b � �W � �V
!1 .11��P! .. / F }S� O ¢ N
... -1Sp ptl tll�
❑ ��.�'�� PROPOSED ROW DEDICATION �a��
���..,.,..a� ��e- �a n � r� � �
.�o.�a�oiw� �
m w
.YOrr�p...a
Eao�cr ��
N0. 1la0a
TYPE RMN�O
' . _.�J __. _. _.. _
I
� �. i �� 3 ���a� ��*��,� � ��
� , ,�.� � �;�� � � ��� �� ��
;�� ... �� . � ��=`� � � �`
�_u � . � , ,
. � x-r � ��� � � � � �
�..., �,� +� �, �
,
„
.
� fi �
�� �, � � ����� ..� >� ����� ,
�; . . �
� � ���,
�� .
_ - .
, ' ���� � � � ��� ��� �. �
. �� . �.._ ,�
�� � � „ � �'
�►...,..,�r � `�'.` °�,�- � „�c. _ : I
3
.� �. - � � .��
,� `� �
, p � ��.= � ,�.a ���-� � ���
i �� � � �.,,�
� � �:, . ��, �` � � ���� �� � ,� �
� ,� �, �� '�r•` � ,� , _����� ,���a �`
..._ � u , �' ��* ��� �°_,,�; � ���' � ' � � .�, •
�� + �� �g . ��- � .
� ��
.� �' � �� �� ,��� �� � �� �� � ° �� �� �" ��
- +�1,� ,� ,�«'`, '1�'�`' .r,�•�.. �� �"�:, `�
�'� I '` �.?:. � a� �z�� �' J��� �``,�,„ � �� '� .
� ' � v�� #§ �
� '
.+�,� �_ . �
;� � ,
< �. �*. o = ° , '� `
, e s -'. _�
, ' a�t . � � �r -: p � �� � . A�w�I�yMIMYNt t�
«„ �
r. , �- �
. x .. ,,. y y'
r
,... , � .N � y�,`��•. �a�6"�, ` �,.
» ,
, „ .. r� , ;t
� � �. � � � +1, �� � �y� , �
� � ��
� � '� � . "�
�
� �� �s^ �`,,� � �� � ��� �
��
.r _ �� ., . - �
�
, � , � � y �' i
�"'"
�'e.
�
; ,� =` � � x.��, � � , � °�r �',.e�,: .�u�> �, .
��
� < �'� � ��,� � ��� ,� ���� � .�� �. . .
� '�� � �
_ , .., � ,.�, �
y v
; �s � �, ,; � .. ' � .'` �� �� -
'
y ,� . �
r �
�. . «:... �.,� n : �.. � Ja. >� ..,� � ' i r� �a. 5�k� ,�°t�`.. � ... .. ?'�� '1
� ��� . � '��s .
',.
� �� � � � a�� �
>
.
� � ,�»� � . ,?� p �^,.�. � � . J�. �y�,� a ' �`'�. . .
� � '�� . 1M � .� .� � `3" �'Y� c. , r�;�N.,_ .
� '"e+ y �r . �� .� o-' >, ..�� �. °":. ��. �c S
,
"�#,, � � � '��ri� � ► � � � � � � ,. � _'�� , , �a�. �`i
� _+i�.. .._ . ,_ �� � ,�� ��..
,� g �[� — — ���� �- — ��: � �� ��`� �,�'
, z .
_
/i
uu �'A� � '.� � ° � � � �...' �� � — _. ,
� ��''��� �� � � � �, � � °� �;
�� �,�; �,��- .... :` � , ,i.
' , , ,-
� �. �' ; r' "+,, ,. $f.�. �#► . �'- .. j 1
< �3,� :y�,�>�_ � r— �� �` �
`� •�� � �� .� � r
l " ��s� � �, �� :. �'' �� � ��.' �
, a �, _. ��.
�r � �� �' '4 � , .,� � _�! i � � � .�. ,.�.
� �� � . �
§ F
wl � a
-« � '"�' � '� . ��' �g _ . M: _. ,.. � � 'v ��ya .
e
� n �
� {�
. ; �z� d� a .. ' - �� , .
. � �� �`� � �� .�. �B )a< �9A �:. .��
!,. � N: ��� 8"�a a +'�'�, �� R.� �... $a�•
'�*}.�" . 'W.. `�y�k.. s � '!, � ���
g = �i & �.. � E � "0� '� pT
' �s -�7 � ' . , . � �� , , � k �.s �r �,�._.
���� .. .:. �
! t�� � .� ' * �� t�� � k�„� ��_ � �� � y� ,� `.
..y � fi �„'7�+,�w'. �< '��;� .. $R4 �," '`� �,,
. � �, �t' �..� ' ; `�� .'�. ���.. . L�
+
� ` �,
..: ��. � ^ . ��, y�� . �,,, �� '= a
=s. �
.o � .. � � •� � ^r+ '�' ''j ""s _'
_,.r;�,,._� �� *� � , - _ _ � ' _ _ � _ -
_ ,
- � � ����� � � �s �,�,�� � ,�r`.'_ � 4�. �'.� I
J;.
s ,� . ., - `° � . �� x
�u� �,*�G�, � x �r
.., .
� �� �i' k r.. � ��� � �� �� .:
. ., �. - . �� � . . +�.
� �.,.� .�.� _ �.,.�: � �� ' I�- :.
�� Y p �� g� ^;� Y� ..`� r�ru, ��` ,��'���,'�
�k 'i� , ,�, c . x . � � : 'c a
a � 'w
�.. �� +� ,. .�. � . �:. ,.. ' ..
FYe9.M �1..� �\�� a�,�=��* ��
. b � s. , '1F` __. "� ��^��. .
�x_
' . 3. .$ s. b..,, # - � ( '� � ,�k
� � � ��+°' .. .. . �' �` °-.� � � �� � �. �, .. �
.�I
y � � , z
_ . � ':.- � , � .
� -_ ,
-.
�:�"���. . �_: � � ' .,, `'�'' �` �
.
"� �,� . � ���
� ��
� �� �. �. �� �.� �r �„ V � . �, � ";� � I ��� $�
� < '
.
,,� �� �
.�;�
�� 6 � ���� �� �� � E g
. �
����.at _ • .
(
,,, � � �� � � � ,�t � � � ��'�:' ° � ,��� � , .
.. � � � � �� I I �
�'� ���'��. ;�,, :��� ,X�� Eh ; . �:
ry�S� � .� �. � R � , � u
� y�� ..' s ��� � � � � � �k. �-r� � ,a�„
a � re �« �h��. �� . �,`&a� ' a . � ,y� x.�
� ° A
� �� � , : :.I,.
>.,�5!e .��. •� � � 9�"r � i y� � ".
� � ,
� � `� � �+&� � '��'� � � ,_,;'! �ce�¢:�; � 1 ��� '^*� '
� .,.+��� i . � <.
�I
I�
i �
:1 �
(
� o�O 9�EET OE4CNE➢BY_DATE NO. DATE NEVi90N BY 5FA Oesig�6raup.I�r
^ ORANT/B7_¢�_DATF srnucniwLL I�����I w+ou5EluNr�B+c
4 RENEMED B�_DATE AERIAL EXHIBIT BM06WWnMnplen6qu�nDr.9Ah]dD
� � � °F �cr�o�r�F. FONNER PARTTTION nau.�e,a.�erm
p:�50])611-Wtt F(50316{}7903
4 SCALE �pQf•p �MnlpnPaN.eom
1@IfN/A
WU9LDIr0
PRE-APPLICATION
CONFERENCE REQUEST
CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall 8lvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX.• (503) 684-7297
GENERAL INFORMATION
/ FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Applicant: �"��✓\ �e��c-�'Z_
Address: 19 2�6 S�,J y(Q.�,� {�v er Phone: �3 69 2-3390 Case No.: �,�C.� . Z-�O y`"���7
City: j��,�A_�-�.n U� �_ Zip: G 70Cn�-- Receipt No.: Z.�%`� ' C103(o �—
�
S Application Accept�ed By:
Contact Person: �a�}� ,�.(�r�� Phone: SQ?-�iNl-�3/I
(�,ai>>��nr5 �p� Date: �J��J�D �
Property Owner/Deed Holder(s):
DATE OF PRE-APP.: � ��� �
� � �V1' �O ,/ �
� TIME OF PRE-APP.: oZ 5 �
Address: ! (�-'I `� � V� TU✓!✓I�r Phone: PRE-APP. HELD WITH: ��l�
Clty: ' '��iYy� ZIP: Rev.11/8/2002 i:lcurpinlmasterslrevisedlPre-AppRequest.doc
Property Address/Location(s): 1 I LI�USW�v�Ner�lri��
r�� �O,Gw'r�-r CcLrvss �f'���t SW �J�nCt' REQUIREDSUBMITTALELEMENTS
{Note: applications will not be accepted
without the required submittal elements)
Tax Map &Tax Lot#(s}: Z5� 0 3 I�-G Z3(?L�
Zoning: '���-1 . � ❑ Pre-Application Conf. Request Form
Site Size: �• �3 ac��S' 2 COPIES EACH OF THE FOLLOWING:
❑ Brief Description of the Proposal and
any site-specific questions/issues that
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE INFORMATION you would like to have staff research
prior to the meeting.
All of the information identified on this form are required to be
submitted by the applicant and received by the Planning Division a ❑ Site Plan. The site plan must show the
minimum of one (1) week prior to o�cially scheduling a proposed lots and/or building layouts
pre-application conference date/time to allow staff ample time to drawn to scale. Also, show the location
prepare for the meeting. of the subject property in relation to the
nearest streets; and the locations of
A pre-application conference can usually be scheduled within 1-2 driveways on the subject property and
weeks of the Planning Division's receipt of the request for either across the street.
Tuesday or Thursday mornings. Pre-application conferences are ❑ The Proposed Uses.
one (1) hour long and are typically held between the hours of � Topographic Information. Include
9:00-11:00 AM. Contour Lines if Possible.
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCES MUST BE SCHEDULED IN ❑ If the Pre-Application Conference is for a
PERSON AT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTER FROM MONOPOLE project, the applicant must
8:00-4:OO/MONDAY-FRIDAY. attach a copy of the letter and proof in
the form of an affidavit of mailing, that
.r MORE THAN 4 PEOPLE ARE EXPECTED TO ATTEND THE the collocation protocol was completed
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IN YOUR GROUP, PLEASE (see Section 18.798.080 of the Tigard
INFORM THE CITY IN ADVANCE SO THAT ALTERNATE ROOM Community Development Code).
ARRANGEMENTS CAN BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE THE
❑ Filing Fee$265�fr Z$7=
GROUP.
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE REQUEST
Map 2S103AC Tax Lot 2300
11480 SW Fonner Street
Applicant's Representative:
Matt Sprague
SFA Design Group, LLC.
9020 SW Washington Square Drive, Suite 350
Portland, Oregon 97223
Proposal:
3-Lot Partition
Description:
The applicant is looking to propose a 3-lot partition as shown on the attached site plan. T'he
average lot size is 8,310 SF. The existing house is located on lot 1 and will remain. No street
improvements are planned other than right-of-way dedications which will amount to 7-feet to
provide 27-feet to centerline for a Neighborhood Route. T'he corner radius of the right-of-way is
currently proposed to be 44-feet which will allow a 55-foot curb radius. This results in the
ability to allow future constntction of an elbow corner or eyebrow corner whichever is deemed
appropriate. The exact location of the house may have some impact on which is used.
Sanitary sewer is available on both frontages of the site to serve the 31ots. 6-inch and 24-inch
water lines are available on both frontages to serve the 31ots. Storm drainage for the lots will be
accommodated at the catch basins and crossing near the northeast corner of the site for lots 1 &
2. Lot 3 will direct storm drainage to the line in SW Elton Ct. A fee-in-lieu of water quality is
appropriate for this sma11 development.
uestions:
1. What is the fee in lieu amount per lot and does the City agree this is appropriate for this
small project?
2. What is the City's time-line for approval on this iype of project? t-{-5 �Q��c�
3. Is a neighborhood meeting required? �,}O
4. Have there been any past pre-apps on this parcel and are those notes available?
y�:s
P�s b�,��S�� - - - - - - �
- - - - - - �W r���'�12
� ss -
� �
,,
.�
, '� �� � w�a�...��
.�'�w�
w
� _ �/�-
i � _---- — - -
i
� i
i
�
i
i
l i �
�' i i '
� � � 10, 326 S� � _,
� ,.
6 � �
N : i o I
J
(
/ I
� � I
�� �1�10 �
_- _ _ _
.
�x.�S �
- I
�sc• S+�••-� � �
I
: �
- - � ? �507 S �
�
� � �
, �
� I - - - - - - - - - - - -
J�n-16-04 16: 24 Gert 7ffices 503 �2 5433 P.02
�� �^ I � 5000 � $
. , � �
. , o ( . , � ,�
tl � R
� � se�-as-oow �oe.oe I�-� � aao.r3 �"� �'�ti �
�° iie�oo--�-- ���������������������� ioo.00 �� R�����������4Z1����������������
� � �/��
S V Y ° ���������������y,��������`�'� �������
� , NW CORNER 88l627 j �
i i
� 191.Z0 a �.07 73.88 W 110.51
% g � � � � 6500
�, � � 2300 � ;7800 3 � 1
� � 1� �, 6100 ry
i .83 AC � �
�� � 2200 � ^ � �� �
.86�►c 4j fi600
�� �ai.00 �-y � 2
� Sei•59-o0E ' �'' 63.]1 �
\\'� $ f�� �73.88
w °
� � � 6700
. . �g2 p 4� 6200 sa.1s �
g 1 2
. � m � 2400 8 see-ss-ooe �) N���w 6800�
� .43 AC� --- t2s.eo 4
.4
� --..w -_ - � .� _ � 8� 3:
g 7��� ��.. tO
� �' g � � 695 0
�a�.00 --y n
M NB8-66-OOW 113.Z1 n 600
Li I YZ) `'g 6e.41 n a .
V ! 71�0 �'�o�°� 7 2
� � � . g1
�,� „s.a� � °ea
� 0 2600 0�"' ?8� � � 3e
� ;� 1.36 AC ��� �7200 a � l� " ��.
i $ 8 2�a6 � � �
� fz 137.32 a ?Q 66
/ I •8
% � $�� io 7r'J
�� I �� 7 O� � �
CENTER OF SECTION 7300
� 9
�� �s�.00 �e2s e�o W Z�'' Hease-oow
— �, ,, . ,.
_ �, � , . , ,
— - „' �.� �,.� 3�.�0 �•.\ � �> ��� < ., .. .. > .. �
— �. �. . . . . . .. .. � . �.
- `,` . , . , „ . ,, ;,' �;, � . � ,,' ,� • N ,'
i� , i� i�' � . � `� �. i. ��"i
i. i. � ♦ i \ / � � � /� \ �/` ` �
��i .vi ivi .yi 'i v �J `' .
,%: , .�t . , . , , , . , �, ,,, z�''°d,s � ,��w E ``,,,
� �, � , ,;i , ' �
;, ;; r' � �.. '., �� �> ' �•,
.��na �.,� '.,' � � �i� �, 8�,,, � :, , ,
� 96AF ., , . % < ,� .�,
'. '; , , .". , . � � , $ �,
�. � A • � n �, R� \r �/ �� ?8/ \ `Y` .\ �}
�� � i i i`
' �,' �.,� �" . �.. `�6, .�� ..'
,�� ;; 86" 3 ,�,
CH/CA G� TI TL E
This plat is for your aid in locating your land with reference to streets and other parcels.
While this plat is believed to be conect,the company assumes no liability fo�any loss occurring by reason oi reliance thereon.
Map No.2S103AC 02300
cwc�oo m�iHSUwwcE co��wY
10001 S.E.SUNNYSIDE ROAD
CLACKAMAS,OREOON 97075
J�n-16-04 16: 24 Gert 7ffices 503 �2 5433 P.Ol
�rder No: 279583
L8(�J►L D88CRIPTZON
PARCEL I:
The following real property situated in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and
State of Oregon, described as follows, to-wit:
BEGINNING at a point in the center of County Road No. 495, which point of beginning
bears South 0°53' West along the North and South center line of Section 3, Township 2
South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, a distance of 2216.8 feet from the
one-quarter corner on the North line of said Section 3, and which point of beginning
bears North 0°53' East 462.0 feet from an iron pipe at the recognized center of said
Section 3; thence from the above described point of beginning South 0°53' West in the
center of said County Road No. 495, a diatance of 126.9 feet; thence South 89°53' East
191.0 feet; thence North 0°53' East 134.7 feet to the center of said County Road No.
495; thence South 87�46� Weat 191.2 feet to the place of beginning.
PARCEL II:
BEGINNING at a point in the center line of County Road No. 495 {Fonner Road) , which
point is 2343_7 feet South 0°53� West along the North and South center line of Section
3, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard,
County of Washington and State of Oregon, from the North one-quarter corner of said
Section 3, which point is also the Southwest corner of that tract conveyed to Joseph
E. Filey, et ux, by Deed Book 436, Page 530, Washingtvn County Deed Records; thence
continuing South 0°53' West 50 feet to the Northwest corner of that tract conveyed to
Fenimore F. Walrod, Jr. , et ux, by Deed Book 374, Page 355; thence 5outh 89°53' East
along the North line of the Walrod tract, 291.0 feet to the Northeast corner thereof;
thence North 0°53' East 50 feet to the Southeast corner of the aforementioned Filey
tract; thence North 89°53' West along the South line of said Filey tract, 191.0 feet
to the point of beginning.
_ �' ` , �-2 �-
�/� �`'
� �
� 2/
� �
�
�
I
.�
;: ��
��
b� ���
�
,
;
____ : .-
�— T �
� � �
�
� �aJ�
, , i � ,�,
� �` `�, �
; �
; ����
� �
`,
� I
�
_ __
.
_ _ __ ;
���
� �
�
i
I-- --- --____
� �
I
I
� ;
I I
�
� , � , � , , , � , , , , , � y � 630� ^-� ��
, , , . „ �
� ,� ,� ;� ;�c „ � �� c� �
� � i � / � � � � i � � � 'I (Q/ � O
�� �� � \ y y �.., •--/'f� p+ -
` � ` � ` � � ' , � � � � .41AC � � N
, '`�� �T' %�i `� � \ �i /I� !-
i �
� i � � / � i � /I ZI
� �� � � � i �� � � � i / W -
� � �� i� � '� i / �
� , � � � � i � � � � � � �\�i � O j+ WI
\ �I �I
� \ �. i ^ � i � � %I W I
T\ i � i � S� ' /� / �I I
, � , - o�� - � � � � 1 sa�-4s-oow �os.oe � �o�
\ � /�„� \/ ,' Q 1
' � ' � � ` ' ` � 115.00
,�� ;� ,� �'1' `' ;: `,� ^ � \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ 2C
� '
/ h / � \ � / � i `� �
\� \� � � ❑
, ' � � � � 55�0� �51.�6� i NW C�RNER 85/627
�
' S. COLLINS
6 ' � � k ` x� � �� i
ti
y �, '1 `� .� �, �. i
� , ' � , � � , '� ' � � �t i 191.20
�3• , a � � ,
,� ,, ,� � � i
2S903BD�o �103B� 2S�039�° i �
7ObdQ , '?�'� i O�flO , '� 1 a2�00 , i � ° � �r��i'.��'�,�'1
.- ` �
1, 7�� � ��� %�, �4�, � � 2300 � �2�s�..,� �� C�����,�
, ,
, , , ,
r \��� �` �`� � , '`� �n� , , � .63 AC
�\ , „ ,,
e
� , - � , � � � � � i o 2200
�\ � ° 3�� i �
,�\ o � �s�.00 � N .65 AC
, sw E�Ta N cT i 589-53-OOE
, o
�� o 0
, „ , , , k � o
� � ' � �� ` '�� � � ' � o 0
. � � � � . � �n
� � ,� � ,\ �n
� \ / � � � � \� ' ` ' ❑
� �'� %� ;'. �� �, 199.�0 ��
� � . , . . � � �
.i �, �,� x >
' � � . � . � , �
� � � �{' . � � �
�
�c ,� ,� , � ,� p
, \ , , ; , - , , . , � , ° 2400 0
i Y h
, ' � �23�038f�' � � ,' � � ,' �� �e� °D ui S89-53-OOE
%� ,��oi �� , �� , ,�, ,�? � .43 AC �25.eo
�h\ .94 bC �;' ��� �; � o
, rn
�
� , . , . � . , . � °
. �� �� ; � � a ri
, r . . � , � � �
. � . � � � , �, 191.00 � �n
�� iv� i �`� , "� � ` �
' ` ' ` � ' � � N89-55-0OW N
� � �. '� y �
� , . , � ' � � � '
� . . . , i
'� y .41 AC �'�N' .33 AC �
'<� ��' ;' '���� 1400
,
, �
,
' ',;� �� �;� �i �i 5000 � � � .isAC _
� i � � ` N j' W I '� lt1
j ' � .. C
i
Sdfl �; � �� �� t..) 9+78, � (�
� ' � ' S87-46-OOW 108.08 i yp 140.73 -
v '1 ry 100.00 80.00
: :.,:� ��,,� ° i�5.00 ,����,���,�,�.�������������� zooz-,�asa1 ������������������CZ������������,������
, , , .,n
`� ❑ r�\\\\\\\\\\\\\\�\\\\\\\\ ` `.�\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\,
�51.�6� �NW CORNER 85I827 �� � i ����� �
� S.COLLINS � i
x�\\,��, � 8 53
"o \ ,, \ ,� i 191.20 0 85.07 73.98 W 116.51 1� p
� � ao � o d
� �S�B� � � � '" � `r � 6�'J�0 � � 46�
;� i �o � ao 78�� b � o
, 14�, � ^ 2300 � 1:,ti �, fi100 N z° �'
�� �R�, , � � .83 AC °D � � ��` w �
. '� � � 0 2200 � � '� o° V
3�' � � � 6600 � �
197.00 � � .85 AC a � t7 2 ��.� �
.O N �T � S89-53-OOE �t' 53.11 � J
o° ° � 1g1
x� � �\ o ° 1� �73.88 �
. ' � � o �
'� �� � 67�Q N .45
' � �
�� '' � 191.00 � � � °
;x� ;>�� � � 7900 � 6200 so.19 3 � �
.. �� � 2 � 2 39.5 2
0
;y;\,;r; � ° _ 240� u�i S89-53-OOE �) N89-43-51W 6800�
, � ` ,'� � .43 AC �25.eo 4 � 4 `'�.�° �
'�', �� �^� � o° � e) 3; ��' �n' � n
Y � o - - 7000 -.... � �e e �
. ,' �„' ° �s�.00 ° �' 6 ``' � 6900 �
� �, 5 �� � �� �
� '/ � N89-55-0OW �N 113.21 �
�.
0 A �,o.
y Y tt] �'a, �8.41 � ��D ' � '`
„' �. .
,• '�' V I 7100 s� �� � z� 7700 �o.c
., ,
I' � ��y � � �e8 �� �rR. A
� tls.ss � s `� ,� �
I�n/• % p 26�� '� CD' 2e V7V o 3¢,$ � 3s.z� '
, i � a o � •u�j �/ ^, .��
�eD�� � n 1.35 AC � � � 7200 � � ���.
� � � i '� �0 8 7.9��' ¢��' m � n
�' ', � j z �37.32 �`' e'@ rq , �v
��R``�a�� � � �a $°6 ,� 7500 �600� �
' ry i CENTER OF SECTIUN 7300 � 74�Q � 11 � 12 �
i
�0� �Q °D m
� '%� � 191.00 N88-53-O�W 9 tL�
�t\`��:\`:��'�,`;\`. 125.6Q N8e-58-08W
� �. ,� �. ,�
- � � � � . ' 4.
_ .� ��� � ' � ' `.� 31�0 . , .v, ,�, .< < " � x � h � 1 . ,� .90 � :7
� - � � � ,}� '� � ` � �Y� � � , � � � � . � � , � , , �
�i I� - � i �� ��' � i �i �� i � i � � . i � � �� ,,� \�i� \�.' ` � i ��i ��. ��' �.� � i i� �.i
, �w�.rw�r...�.+,.�u�aa�..�
'- -- - —1,
_ _ i i� � d P9
� 6- �-� � ��-'-{�--"�'� � i F6' a � o � ���
! -- - _ t'` --- - 6— -- —� � ����_ , � ,����� � � � ;
_ � -� ee 7 Rte g>�= � � E,� 6 �� " „%;F% s
� ��� -- ---- --g::@ ��� C�� y. ' � �,, ��.v.: - --� �
..�nn_ .. � E 6 � ' �, .� : ti�
� pz��*��� �` �� ��� E� I�� va• �� �' I i'�`1�( �r 'l � /, �_
e n CG _�,��.� �:, iQ
.�5 L� p� Y�+_ _ '"P�s���_�4 FF- i r. �, i/ .q�` ..�j �y�
- �a. �p� 9_� $�� ___ � �����8_� ;a �, �' � , ,� :�� z„r��;�`-��
� p d p$ � � ►
� 3 8 - ._fr >, �P
� �
�� �
� d ;�i; '�.' i
,�„ -- - -�-- � - u.�- , '. � , , �,�h° ,.= � Y�`,� �;: '�
� �.
� --_ .. --- �- ��- —� I�:E� � ���� ��' ;h �i^' � �' a �' I;' �
� �g�«�
- - -+ g�y ��_ ' � a � c R° C ��i`� �6 � E � �
g-. �1- � � �y �'i ,ti c -
� � - -- �-- - " 4 x.__. � �� ��� . . �F y�.g '�`��� �.i F"
� -- - -- �-� -� — � �! _/_ . - i
s- � i � ;� 5ca'� ��k�- �
•� iY, ii; ���,�7� � _ �� � �aS.w. • vtsii
a '�`..� � � ��
� � $ _6 �' �_.�--�—�--S— ; '='a-' - � �' �$..n�y � �p �/ ��� � { :i-
--°---- � s � 1�
. '� , � ` 1�'. , ,�s � � �,
—y— m '�� �����$�; � �1;� :,�
-`--�; _� _6 _�'—�� � 8 `-;;. - � is '"I'�� a � _�� cQ�p �L
i 'I
E- '=';"��b' ,�` ° € -� � R�� ���
� aa�A�Ir�—_ \ `�__._�.. v� f�p!
_ � tw� . _ — — yc R � _.�i i ��0� ��6�•�m�l
_ � -� '.�� ::� ���� ������ � �- Ir�
_ --- --- e-- /��qg � Ps■ f � a F." . - cs 'p rr i i I
_ � . . ._-_ __ a� � � � ' As y4 �!�
= t � --�- -- - /� a � ���3 ��A� � ���-��_ 4 �_ 1 s� �� � �'�I �� h i 1
- 1 p -- - �i �
�-- l -- `'✓-� �8�e � � �n � . .�._ i� �I
_ ,� �. :a� -- -�-��tl `��� '�8 =-'� � i^}-�.;
� � � , � �
� � � ":1�" � �� � _ / �r- � i g g � � � �
_ t �. � I g" ��-- -- �� � �is ��: m �� ��� � . N I �9` �N �. �, ,'I
� ,�
4 = g -- l�� -- — -; � �' �� g_ m �- - —� �� ''
� „
i ' - �- '- - " -- _ _�
,
, � � - _ ---- -- -- --� �
_ � �y 'r, _ - .,-.4__._..., �T ---.-- `r„''
1 ` - - - -' ` - -
'� .'._'_.. ._._ g` " _""___ _ _ _ _�^� - I
_ ___.'" '
_ "_ "_ '
` — i � __- ---- -- ��a I— - - �wFOnR+er._ ��f=__ _ r'
� � ' � � �` ��'�''�� .u��+� NY i ,{{I `h I
�_ �_6 �jG. O .�� � a� �`i`.i^�I
�, - -- - — — — .--c� -�, 8���' ������ F�€���Ya ��BR��F��. ' i�� } �
;.� -. _._.�_ _6 s � � S_ I S � 5 �� �B���� ���g'P��d I������' �� � � , '�
� �b��A� � � � � '�a zp;9• I� �i
.� I � / \,'"o �� s�f ���€'$ �� I� F� � 6 '";•�wj;l
. ' _._—_ ..._ _ _ ... -. ..-__
_ .. ... . _ 0 44 .. B � 1 ' '� _a '���� � ` :�i
- I = :
p nn
3... ���.. ..._""_ "- ` •- g��S ��/. i�__��� ���__—_' I I; �.�1
- . � -- a� a �� ' - � -
� �
_ , ,
►. -rf— � � 1t4 s�it= ;�' __. sRa b� g �� V -__ _"_ _..' -'_" "_"_
� � � g � g g ff -�
e ...._��n f �- __�pra�]i' •-� a �..
� V -����i���_ � ''' _- � 5q������ � . _ j� —�_.-. ` ...
-._.
i
L�
� », � s _ ,_-. �M'g�GF - � � r::�g _��(
_: ' ii ��� - --- ��l� _.- � �� �t�4u���-..-� — - ,.� — �_.-- - -- - --��- -�r:3 g�i
iS
Tmn
L .. .-- �E • _'-_ _'__ _
� ,4a � '1��-- __-- — --- �� ��-a'--- - � �,, �a e __��_,_���� �
�
L =� �� F ���i�� �� n� - --- -- - `� --
-- — �� � � � :�
= �5 � � � �=-- �
4 �
� _ - �� �p� —__ g F�__—_ _ __ __ _'__ �p_ ___ �.
�-, ;�� � ������ � �� _ _ -- - �- - ---- - - ---- � ��
- ' ea � _ F�E � — � 1 � �_ _—� ���
_ � m, 3� �I �����---�9- - --- - - -- a- _�_ �
= •� _-�-- -�-�-�- -
�� ., a., � _o r��'� -- - --
_ � � m' �A �'A � - ._ _ _. ^_���� �} --- --- �--- �_S-- �_.__ �_- n�,�(-.{���sy
_ `'-... .
' —...�, - rr� I�. � l�.m. I. ... __ _ �'^PeL L - _ _— -� - 6— — � �__{ ig�F[
, y "' o vm I�-� - --����'fJ _ �f�-- ``�_�� F � I $$ I � ��p�p� ���f
6 � � -_ �-- Y--�-- `�5'� I �66 ��
v o- �„ . �
�, ' � '� a >�, "�w.� °-g � . - _-_ - � C
f F � �_� �1
z z I.. � � _ � - �
_' � c� nV I �T�� a���- ---�— -- � — -- � ��f _— �"_"1�A _ _ �' � {
VI N
. (. __ _ , nIA
i I d�LLo �f���_"._"_ __'_ __��— . �Q —_ — �- ��€
� .
.. \� . z! ���
� �•} � � I I � $ �� � -
--
. _ �.. � ..l. ____. � �{ , _
� ; ,
.`".. •s
� � � � � � S _6__�-- -- -
F� r=s�:;� � �, �_. _ a--- �� - _ �
� - -- ---- -- - --- - - -
-- � � �� ��
. �� �.�.�:
� k KMaOx
� m�� � ,9�1�� NUNTER'S UJOODLAND ���WEST�.n�
�O N611LTANTH s
i F� q '° ��tA= CITY OF?ICsARD,OREGON wcmawHC . ninmwc �wnnMc
� - H_ � «��� •m•�••, ��� SAMITARY 9EUlERN1A?ER PLAN S PROFILES ���y„�"P••.•""+�»,,.ICtI gt?q
(`. � . o•rz xscw.� 1.
Y ...��..
� rr....+�.
.,' .r-....
�
�,�...�,�-�:-�-;...... _ �:-- _. ...,�;a-•,�: - .. .._...�..�,,...--�.. . . _ _.. . . _ .. .- . . . . . ..... • � ��
� �
I
�
��(`�'�� ZV
� ioo . ���'�
� .
� STQRM 51�— 9��
DRAINS �� TO I 11 TH PL
� � 4 0�
90° 8Efy0�13, �4i�-10����
/
� 24"p�j \
45°BEND
' 6- CI
�4�
� I , 6�� GV
U) �
�
W 2300
Z �
Z
O i
NE I/4, SEC 3, T2S , R 11IV
3 RE�:
�
T/6ARD W,4TER D/STR/CT
8777 SW BURNHAM ST
4 p' PO BOX 230000 �
TO IISTH AVE TiGARD, OREGON 97223
�503) 639-1554
' DETAIL OF INTERSECTION�
3 SW FONNER ST
99
DATE: 8'89 SCALEa =20 SEVl►
*.i e ws�n[ss s�wv�t[■
. . .. '.'_.�. . .. . .. r _ti.�.�u. . . . .. . .. � _'_ • ' ',. ...i .__ . . . . � � - .
LOCATED IN THE NE t/4 OF
SECnON 1,T 25,R 1W,WIA;
CffY OF TCqRD,W�ISXINGfpN
CO.,ORECON
PARCEL 2
PARCEL i LEGEND
SuR�Er MONUAIENf TO BE PRESERYE�
IR.IRON ROO, IP�IRON PIPE
$ N OTES ID=INS�DE DIMIEfER;00�OVISI�E WwEiER
� � � c-cws uNe
I \ WS.�WwT[R SERNCE
1)NOTFY MIKE WMITE.CRY INSPECTOR,(63D-�1]1)I4 HOURS 860RE STMTING WORK �P���P0�
� � \ FP�EOGE PAVENEHf
� � B)ILL WOPo(SHALL CONPLY WRII T1C/JtD STMl�PAD SPECS M1D DETNlS. ��FlRE MYORNfT
}, W.WAi�R UNE
a / \ C' TD BE SUBNOITTED N CRY BY F1lGitO�W(7�,� BUILT���E REWIRED
� r �\ 1 DRAWINCS FOR RENEW MID AGPROVAL
t I \ ` 0)COHTP�CTOR WILL OBEY PRON40N5 OP ORS 757.7�1 THROUGN 737.3]1
REGAItDING dCCING NEAR MLRIES.
I 1 �EROSION CONTROL SFiILI BE PR0�IDED BY 7NE CONIR/i.TOR ATµy TIAIES.
� ` � EROSI�N�qffpDL SHPLI CONS15T OF BbBAGS PUCEp AS SHOWN.
I � + � CONSiRlICf10NR�'M NONUMENTS MUS,BE PRESERYED THROUGHOUT
I I C)I.SMJ.$EW.CONNECI1pN P[qNR 15 REOUIRm TO BE OBfNHm FROM
� � I I TME CITY'S BILC.OEPT.PkWR TO CANNECTION TO lllE SEWER SYSfEM.
I I I � "�vueuM c�O�ciRUnR(rrR°� wQe°,"'"�w��[f�,DURI�CONSRtUC�WN.
I I �
I I I O T�+�C CAHINOL$WU1 BE PROVIOED AS NEEDm HY THE CONTRACfOR AT ALL T1ME5.
�TR.�FFI�CONTRO�MIN SMl�LL BE SUBNRTm TO THE CR'f FOR PPPROYAL
' � I i GRIOR TO COYNpICINC NORK. ACCESS Tp ALL,TR/CI$$yNL�BE NNNTNNEO ATµy TIN[5.
� I J)POiNOLE FOR WAEfi LINES A5 SHOwN BEFORE$TORTINC CON$iRUCf10N.
I I � I �Fr+oroIXUnori:co�oR°NSNOU�s�i,ns�Mwse""is.�s.o�VeNw.c�r�ior..nar+.
� � I I KJ S!W[R SERYICES SFWl BE�� 7074 WC,WD nT 21[MIN OR AS$T�U(m.
1 � � f�
� S' I `
I I � � �
1 �ae.oe
1 I r+ a/w s erar�r w s
xS ]/o io�v
I �� � I n� aD�M' ^� IXLST R/'y '^ 100.16�N) w r�11 ��CE.MER
� ———— ———— ._ v�un wwyc.--�--�--= �"---�� zat.90
-aw�mr�--'--_—. 'w`-- "-'--�-- ��-----�- -_-_---— —_ c
—.-�-.—. . ._ m � � .
D_ ____� __p______—. ___ ________-vs+.-va- w��..a�._—
__.__o--—- .3-— —— —— —INS� 122.8 LFa WC SEWER Oa50 omr wo.arc IYw
o�i �_ 1 SO � � �
n+
' ° S.W. FONNER ---- —
on n —__ - y°,�________ C.R. �95
--�ux�r=ortF;3roaro e � : s arai�ai• w ----- ��°
3 ,
2t22.6 "________'_
- '___'_-_-w'___ �___._
"__________ __ ___'_____ _'
w __ p-_-=__ _____ - __ -_--__
M
DATUM . CITY OF TIGARD BM �42
� BRASS DISC AT NW COR. 121at/
. . . TIPPIIT PL: EL 241.89
8
i. 'Y 245
. . ; � �� . � . �. : F'
. � � . w�na( .+�c�se.w a
240 SCALE: 1" = 20' HOR
„ a : I �X o" ori t" = 5' VERT
. i : � �y. � . : �
�� ' �. �`< �� C1A55'B"� G ULAR KFlELo D 20
�: < 235
:� R �R r �+ oo �
, a� � „""�es 10
. � . - 4fY: � ' ^h i�a
iZ2.6:LF� �.ppx _ 230 ^y b,�.�G�..
' IE IH 231.6 � �
�„ SCALE: t" = 20'
: �r���
�. . �. ; oa�r c -m� aLs
. . . . . 06SI S r .aDA
225
. 2+50 � ^E�wti w.Te s/x/�
2+00 1+50 1+00 0+50 0+00 GILBERiSON
saa n�iRO sr.�c-a
• RE: MlP 96-0009 � C�;��o R
��U
• A S B U I LT F 0 N N E R S E W E R E X T E N S I 0 N F0�sEN�NY��RECO, PERAl17 HOLDER ENGInIEERING ,pB�96'SOPV
ncuto,on s�un
603-0914
� � PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES
➢ ENGINEERING SECTION Q �om"°nnty�°��°"nt
S�iapixgA BetterCommunity
PUBLIC FACILITIES Tax Map[sl: 2s�o3AC
Tax LoUsl: 02300
Use i�pe: Residentlal
The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant
will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be
no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned
commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on
the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements
that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project.
Riqht-of-way dedication:
The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public:
(1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification
right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or
(2.) For the creation of new streets.
Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for:
� SW Fonner to 27 feet from centerline with additional right-of-way dedicated at the corner for a 55
foot radius.
❑ SW to feet
❑ SW to feet
❑ SW to feet
Street improvements:
❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include:
❑ feet of pavement
❑ concrete curb
❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities
❑ -foot concrete sidewalk
❑ street trees
❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee.
CITY OF TI6ARO Pre-Appticatlen CoMer�nce Notea Page 1 ot 6
Englueelioi Uep�rml�llt Secuo�
❑ Other:
❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include:
❑ feet of pavement
❑ concrete curb
❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities
❑ -foot concrete sidewalk
❑ street trees
❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee.
❑ Other:
❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include:
❑ feet of pavement
❑ concrete curb
❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities
❑ -foot concrete sidewalk
❑ street trees
❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee.
❑ Other:
❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include:
❑ feet of pavement
❑ concrete curb
❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities
❑ -foot concrete sidewalk
❑ street trees
❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a finro-year streetlight fee.
❑ Other:
❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include:
❑ feet of pavement
❑ concrete curb
❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities
❑ -foot concrete sidewalk
CRY OF TI6ARD Pre-Appllcadan Conference Notes Page 2 ef 6
Eegloeering pep�rtmsat S�etl��
❑ street trees
' � ❑ street signs, trafi�„ control devices, streetlights and a twu-year streetlight fee.
❑ Other:
Aqreement for Future Street Improvements:
In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently
practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval
may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to provide a future improvement guarantee.
The City Engineer will determine the form of this guarantee. The following street improvements may
be eligible for such a future improvement guarantee:
(1.) Applicanf wil!be required to enfer into a Restrictive Covenant for future street improvements
(2.)
Overhead Utility Lines:
� Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines
adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a
fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines
are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to
�2-�per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines.
35,�0
There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW Fonner on
the north side of the project. Depending on where the applicant takes power the fee may or
may not be required.. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall either place these
utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above.
Sanitary Sewers:
The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) 8 inch line which is located in Fonner, both on
the north and west sides of the property. The proposed development must be connected to a public
sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to provide a separate service lateral to each
residence.
Water Supply:
The Cit�/ of T�ard (Phone:(503) 639-4171) provides public water service in the area of this site. This
service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed
development.
Fire Protection:
Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (South Division) [Contact: Eric McMullen, (503) 612-7010]
provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for
CIT11 YF TI6ARD Pre-App�icatlon Comerence Notes Page 3 of 6
Eqlo��n�'D�partmspt SeeUo�
information regarding the ��+equacy of circulation systems, th� �eed for fire hydrants, or other
. questions related to fire prc :ion.
Storm Sewer Improvements:
All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed
to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm
drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure
that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed.
The applicant wiN have to show how the site(s) wil! drain. There is an existing catch basin at the
northwest comer of the site. The applicant may have to upsize fhe line fhat exits the basin and runs to
fhe northwest.
Storm Water Quality:
The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the
Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which requires the construction of
on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus
contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces.
The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing
an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether
or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new
impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210.
Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the
development application. It is anticipated that this project will require:
❑ Construction of an on-site water quality facility.
� Payment of the fee in-lieu.
Other Comments:
All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City
maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance
access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily
accessible.
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES
In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic
Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected
impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon
CI111 OF TI6AR0 Pro-pppllcadon Conference Notes Page 4 of 6
Ea�lu�rla!oeparLee�t Secue�
the number of trips which � � projected to result from the propo� ' development. The calculation of
. the TIF is based on the prc, �ed use of the land, the size of the � ��ect, and a general use based fee
category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance In limited
circumstances, payment of the TIF inay be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy
permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible o� when the TIF is greater than
$5,000.00.
Pay the TIF
PERMITS
Public Facility Improvement (PFI) Permit�
Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a PFI permit from the Engineering
Department. A PFI permit application is available at the Planning/Engineering counter in City Hall.
For more extensive work such as street widening improvements, main utility line extensions or
subdivision infrastructure, plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for
review and approval.
The Engineering Department fee structure for this permit is considered a cost recovery system. A
deposit is collected with the application, and the City will track its costs throughout the life of the
permit, and will either refund any remaining portion of the deposit, or invoice the Permittee in cases
where City costs exceeds the deposit amount. NOTE: Engineering Staff time will also be tracked for
any final design-related assistance provided to a Permittee or their engineer prior to submittal of a PFI
permit application. This time will be considered part of the administration of the eventual PFI permit.
The Permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security.
Where professional engineered plans are required, the Permittee must execute a Developer/Engineer
Agreement, which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public
improvement construction work. The PFI permit fee structure is as follows:
NOTE: If an PFI Permit is required,the applicant must ohtain thai
permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Diuision.
Building Division Permits:
The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more
detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at
503-639-4171, ext. 304.
Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial,
industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot
grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading
and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain � SIT permit for grading work in
cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation
excavation material is not to be hauled from the site.
CITY OF TI6ARD Pre-Applicaden Comeronce Notes Page 5 of 6
Eull�eerlag Dseartmnt Seetle�
Building Permit (BUP` This permit covers only the cons+° ,tion of the building and is issued
, . , after, or concurrentl} th, the SIT permit.
Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all
work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This
permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially
complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City.
For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a
mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit.
Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing
that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information.
GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS
All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The
engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as
well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in
determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer
will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each
homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall
include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall
also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building.
f-� �{- 'O�.
PREPARE�BY:
ENGINEERI G DEPARTMENT STAfF DATE
Phone: [5031639-4171
Fax: [50316240752
document2
Revised: September 2,20�3
CRY OF TI6ARD Pre-Applicatlon Confer�nce Motes Page 6 ot 6
Eng�a�erlee e�outm�ot SeeUea
.
� CITY OF TIGARD
PRE—APPLICATION CUNFERENCE NOTES ��°„m°�ry�°�°��nt
Sttaping;A BetterCommunity
(Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Yalid for Six (6) Months)
_ _ __ __ ____ _
RESIDENTIAL
�n�c o� e :: r� ���
�r��� 1
APPUCANT: �7� ��L��a t� • AGENT:
Phone: - Phone: ( )
PROPERTY LOCATION:
ADDRESS/GENERAL LOfATION: // �,��° `' � �✓ f=��j.��y'�
TAX MAP(S)/LOT #(S): �5 �("3 i�C - ��3�0
NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: �d���� i�l'�_-�-�— l�•-��P f�� �.���
� �
PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: � /�,-� r�r..�i��i c--tit
. �
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN _ ,
MAP DESIGNATION: G�z <<, �2�, �-� �.� %� `
�
ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: ;E? � � , _
CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAM(C.I.T.)AREA: C,���C
ZONIN6 DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code S�cUOn 16. s �r> l
MINIMUM LOT SIZE:-��sc�sq. ft. Average Min. lot width: � c ft. Max. building height: 3�? ft.
S�Wacks: Front �ft. Side��ft. Rear 1,�ft. Comer 1�ft. from street.
MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: %.
GARAGES:,�(�ft.
❑ NEIGNBORHOOD MEETIN6 [Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting HandouU
THE APPLICANT SHALL NOT{FY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, THE MEMBERS
OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S), AND THE CITY �F TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION of
their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is
required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting
notice. Meetinq is to be held prior to submitting vour application or the application will not be
accepted.
" NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans
Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 oi 9
Residential ApplicationfPlannirg Divisan Secion
� ,� NARRATIVE [Refer ta Cod�Chapter 18.3901
The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable
approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to
consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review
the code for applicable criteria.
�IMPACT STUDY [Refer to Code Sectlans 18.390.040 and 18.390.0501
As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE
AN IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the
development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the
transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system,
the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type
of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize
the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private
property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real
property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or
provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not
roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development.
�ACCESS [Refer to Chapters 18.705 and 18.7651
Minimum number of accesses: �c< <� ��� Minimum access width: `��
Minimum pavementwidth: ����`
❑ WALI(WAY REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Co hapter 18.7051
Within all ATTACHED HOUSI (except finro-family dwellings) and multi-family developments, each
residential dwelling SHALL E CONNECTED BY WALKWAY TO THE VEHICULAR PARKING
AREA, COMMON OPEN ACE AND RECREATION FACILITIES.
�RESIDENTIAL DENSITY CALCULATION [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7151-SEE EIIAMPLE BELOW.
The NET RESIDENTIAL UNITS ALLOWED on a particular site may be calculated by dividing the net
area of the developable land by the minimum number of square feet required per dwelling unit as
specified by the applicable zoning designation. Net development area is calculated by subt�acting
the following land area(s)from the gross site area:
All sensitive lands areas includinQ: � �,y y�' �
➢ Land within the 100-year floodplain; _ 1 p �i� �'or C�-�' �
➢ Slopes exceeding 25%; �( �'S�� nycT
➢ Drainageways; and 1 So�
➢ Wetlands for the R-1, R-2, R-3.5, R-4.5 and R-7 zoning districts. ��,
Public right-of-way dedication: � q Z
➢ Single-family allocate 20°/a of gross acres for public facilities; or �
➢ Multi-family allocate 15%of gross acres for public facilities; or rn�,x = � ���' "`
➢ If available, the actual public facility square footage can be used for deduction.
EXAMPLE OF RESIDENTIAL DENSITY CALCULATIONS:
EXAMPLE: USING A ONE ACRE SITE IN THE R-12 ZONE(3,050 MINIMUM LOT SIZE)WITH NO DEDUCTION FOR SENSITIVE LANDS
Single-family Multi-Family
43,560 sq. ft. of gross site area 43,560 sq. ft. of gross site area
8.712 sq.ft. (20%)for public right-of-way 6,534 sq. ft. (15%)for public right-of-way
NET: 34,848 square feet NET: 37,026 square feet
— 3,050(minimum lot area� - 3,050(minimum lot area�
= ii�Units--�er i�cre = . mts er cre
�7de 6erelopme�C�de requires tl�at the net site are'e�at fer the oext whole dwelling unit NO 80UMDIN6 UP IS PERMfiTED.
�IM"mjmum Prokct Uens�y is 60X N tAe ma�awn allowe�d�nsiql.TO DETERMIME TNIS STANDAB0.MOLTIPLY THE MAIfIMUM NUMBER OF dMITS BY.i.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 9
Residential App6cationlPlanning Division Section
� r
[� SPECIAL SETBACKS [Refer ta Code Sectlon 18.7301
➢ STREETS: feet from the centerline of
➢ FLAG LOT: A TEN (10)-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK applies to all primary structures.
➢ ZERO LOT LINE LOTS: A minimum of a ten (10)-foot separation shall be maintained
between each dwelling unit or garage.
➢ MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL building separation standards apply within multiple-family
residential developments.
�� ACCESSORY STRUCTURES UP TO 528 SQUARE FEET in size may be permitted on lots less
than 2_5 ac�es in size. Five (5)-foot minimum setback from side and rear lot lines.
ACCESSORY STRUCTURE UP TO 1,000 SQUARE FEET on parcels of at least 2.5 acres in size.
[See applicable ioning district fer the primary structures'setback requiremenis.l
� FLA6 LOT BUILDING NEI6NT PROYISIONS [Refer to Code Chapter 18.1301
MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 1'/z STORIES or 25 feet, whichever is less in most zones; 2%z stories, or 35
feet in R-7, R-12, R-25 or R-40 zones provided that the standards of Section 18.730.010.C.2 are
satisfied.
❑ BUFFERING AND SCREENIH6 �er te Code Chapter 18.745)
In order TO INCREASE P CY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE
OR VISUAL IMPACTS betwee djacent developments, especially between different land uses, the
CITY REQUIRES LANDSCAPED FFER AREAS along certain site perimeters. Required bufFer
areas are described by the Code in te�s of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of
deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and
horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screer�s or fences may also be required; these are often
advisable even if not required by the Code. �Fhe required buffer areas may o� be occupied by
vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on �equired buffer area materials
and sizes may be found in the Development Code. ''��
The ESTIMATED REQUIRED BUFFERS applicable to y_.,our proposal area is:
,
Buffer Level along north boundary. Buffer�Level along east boundary.
Buffer Level along north boundary. Buffer Level along east boundary.
� IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIR�D ALONG:
�
�
LANDSCAPIN6 [Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.165 and 18.1051
STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR
PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must
be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private prope�ty within six (6) feet of the right-of-
way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured
four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the
branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations
affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division.
A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED
in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking
areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view.
0 RECYCUNG tRefer to Code Chapter 18.7551
Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE
SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enc{osure within a clear vision area such
as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within
Pride Disposal's Service area. Lenny Hing is the contact person and can be reached at (503)
625-6177.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 9
Residential AppYca6oNPlaxMng Division Secion
� PARKIN6 [Refer to Code C6apiers 18.765 a 18J051
ALL PARKING AREAS AND DRIVEWAYS MUST BE PAVED.
➢ Single-family............ Requires: One 1 off-street parking space per dwelling unit; and
One �1� space per unit less than 500 square feet.
➢ Multiple-family.........Requires: 1.25 spaces per unit for 1 bedroom;
1.5 spaces per unit for 2 bedrooms; and
1.75 spaces per unit for 3 bed�ooms.
Multi-family dwelling units with more than ten (10) required spaces shall provide parking for the use of
guests and shall consist of 15% of the total required parking.
NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED
AS COMPACT SPACES. Parking stalls shall be dimensioned as follows:
➢ Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet. 6 inches X 18 feet, 6 inches.
➢ Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet. 6 inches X 16 feet, 6 inches.
➢ Handicapped parking: All parlcing areas shall provide appro�riately located and dimensioned
disabled person parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to
be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with
Disabilities Act {ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space
symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be
posted.
❑ BICYCLE RACKS [Refer to Code Section 18.7651 �
BICYCLE RACKS are required FO MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND 1NDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks sh be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in
convenient locations.
❑ SENSITIVE IANDS [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7151
The Code provides REGULATtONS FOR LANDS �IVHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR
DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHI� THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL
DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON LOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR �N
UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to reliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre-
application conference based on available ' formation. HOWEVER, the responsibility to preciselv
identi sensitive land areas and their b undaries is the res onsibilit of the a licant. Areas
meetin the definitions of sensitive lan must be clearl indicated on lans submitted with the
development application.
Chapter 18.775 also provides regul ons for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands
areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPM NT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS.
❑ STEEP SLOPES [Refer te Cod�Secdo 8.715.O70.C1
When STEEP SL�PES exis prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be
submitted which addresses e approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code
Section 18.775.080.C. Th repo►t shall tie based upon field exploration and investigation and shall
include specific recomm dations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C.
�LEANWATER SERYICES[CWSI BUFFER STAN�ARDS [Refer to R a 9 96�4/USA Regulabons-Chapter 3l
LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a
vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive
area.
Design Criteria:
The VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table
identifies the required widths=
CITY OF TIGRRD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 9
Resiaen6al npp6cafoNPlanning oivision secfion
TABLE 3.1 YE&ETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS
SOURCE: CWS DESI6N AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAURESOLUTION 8 ORDER 96�44
SLOPE ADJACENT ; ° WIDTH OF VEGETATED
SENSITIVE AREA DEFINITION TO SENSITIVE AREAt � CORRIDOR PER SIDEZ -
_ __
• Streams wfih intermittent flow draining: <25%
� 10 to <50 acres 15 feet
� >50 to <100 acres 25 feet
• Existing or created wetlands <0.5 acre 25 feet
♦ Existing or created wetlands >0.5 acre <25% 50 feet
♦ Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow
• Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres
• Natural lakes and onds
• Streams with intermittent flow draining: >25% 30 feet
� 10 to <50 acres
� >50 to <100 acres 50 feet
♦ Existing or created wetlands >25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure
. Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow in 25-foot increments from the starting
• Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres point to the top of ravine(break in
♦ Natural lakes and ponds <25%slope), add 35 feet past the top
of ravine'
Starting point for measurement = edge of the defined channel (bankful flow) for streams/rivers, delineated weUand boundary, delineated spring
boundary, and/or average high water for lakes or ponds,whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intermittent springs, located a minimum of 15
feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated corridor,shalt not serve as a starting point for measurement
ZVegetated corridor avereging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition.
3The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to
15 feet,if a stamped geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine.
Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor:
NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals,
dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract
from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, excepf as provided for in the
USA Design and Construction Standards.
Location of Vegetated Corridor:
IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended
for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a
separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit.
� CWS Service Provider Letter.
PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service
� Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the R&O 96-44 sensitive
area requirements. If there are no sensitive areas, CWS must stil( issue a letter stating a CWS
�
Service Provider Letter is not required.
[,� SI6NS [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7801
SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of
Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or
height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a
development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for
Director's review.
[�TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS [Ref�r to Code Section 18.790.030.CJ
A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a
certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a
development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development,
or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible.
CIN OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conterence Notes Page 5 of 9
Resideneal appGcaGorJPlaudrg Di,�ision sec6on
� THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following:
➢ Identification of the location, size, species, and condition of alt existing trees greater than 6-
inch caliper.
➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in
caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D according
to the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code
provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots:
. Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a
mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees;
. Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that
two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.;
. Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that
50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.;
. Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no
mitigation;
➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and
➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to
protect trees during and after construction.
TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT
APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be
replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D.
[,� MITI6ATION [Refer to Code Section 18.190.060.EJ
REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines:
➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics.
➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably
available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural
resource value.
➢ If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would
not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance
with the following formula:
. The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the
estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the
largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be
viably locafed on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more
replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property
or, with the consent of the owner, private property.
➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to
allow growth to maturity.
IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the
consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree
replacement.
[�� CLEAR VISION AREA [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7951
The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BE71lVEEN THREE (3) AND
EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size
of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street`s functional classification and any
existing obstructions within the clear vision area. The applicant shall show the clear vision areas on
the site plan, and identify any obstructions in these areas.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 9
Residential AppficationlPlanning Division Section
. �
• [� FUTURE STREET PLAN AN�IXTENSION OF STREETS [Refer to Code Section 18.810.030.FJ
A FUTURE STREET PLAN shall:
➢ Be filed by the applicant in conjunction with an application for a subdivision or partition. The
plan shall show the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the
proposed land division and shall include boundaries of the proposed land division and shall
include other parcels within 200 feet surrounding and adjacent to the proposed land division.
➢ Identify existing or proposed bus routes, pullouts or other transit facilities, bicycle routes and
pedestrian facilities on or within 500 feet of the site.
Where necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall
be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed.
�] ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS [R�fcr to Cede Secdea 18.810.0601
MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process.
Lots created as part of a pa�tition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum
15-foot wide access easement.
The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 2%z TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the
� � 7 parcel is less than 1%2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning disfrict.
[J� BLOCKS [Refer to Code Section 18.810.0901
The perimeter of BLOCKS FORMED BY STREETS SHALL NOT EXCEED 1,800 FEET measured
along the right-of-way center line except where street location is precluded by natural topography,
wetlands or other bodies of water or, pre-existing development.
When block lengths greater than 330 feet are permitted, pedestrian/bikeways shall be provided
through the block.
CODE CHAPTERS
_ 18.330(�ondrtiona�use) �H.6ZO(Tgard Triargle Design Standards) �18.765�onsa�c P���R��,��
_ 18.340(o�ectors�nterpretation) 18.630(wash�ton square Reypr��enter> 18.775(sens�ve�ands Review)
_ 18.350(P�anned�evebprnent) � 18.705�n�y��c��,��,� � 18.780�sg��
_ 18.360(site oevebpment Review) 18.710(Acoessory Residentia�uni�s) 18.785(Temporary use Permi�)
� 18.370(varianceslAdjustrnen�s) ��18.715{oensity Computations) �18.790(Tree Removaq
_ 18.380(zon�Ma�ext Amenomeri�) 18.720(oesgn compat�iury standards) _ 18.795(v�sua�c�earance Areas)
_ 18.385��a�r�o�Pe��� �L 18.725(Environmenta�Pertom�ance s�ndards) _ 18.798(wue�ess conrnunica�on Faa�ries)
�.L 18.390(oeasion w�awny ProceeuresnmPact study) 18.730(�ce�ons To�eve�oprrient star�dards) �. 18.810(street 8 utiFry�mprovernent standards)
18.410�a��,ad�v„��► 18.740(Hsto�c o�er�ay) _
�18.420��arid Par�ons) 18.742�r+«�o�,�so�,P�m�
_ 18.430�s�na�� � 18.745(�andsca�y s sc►eenng star�dards)
� 18.510�R��,�i zo���a�� 18.750(Manutactured�Mob�t�orne Re9utations)
_ 18.520 ico�za,���a�� 18.755(Moced so�id wastehtecycrsiy storaye)
_ 18.530 p�a�i z«�a,y o�� 18.760�r�«�,to�,y sm,aoo��
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 9
Resideneal nppfica6onlPlanre�y Divisia,section
' ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS:
� t'1lu;�iC�d��O�; +oke y— �D ulEr_�C }� f`Ll' rc,J:c (!�2(.�S�Q:� b:�c'F �hF_ LII:G�iC'(�ti[!��� �1\C1S �E.�n
�ee�.ec� �n,,.�l�te .
J� REO�11t'E'_S
— G�S s���, �_� �,�,,b�.� �e�-��
� �r�� ��C�n � 5��Je�.1 �a�o;Y. � C��r'�.��e.c� �r�r�',.i�
" �-�cc�ss �c.ot�
' �mPC,c� S�v C�c.
�Y1��Ll'i�iOn �1r.Ol:lC� �C30�SS G�`� C:�G.i'C.;a` G�.�rzr�c�. ��c� il�� b�e�
G�.�c..1c�� o;. t����e rl c� ��,e,sP ra-�es
T— .��1�m,�' L�irh�6�6�CS �t���-Fc^ QpQI� CC��[9� 15 �Cf,'M¢� CO;.,��2+°L
PROCEDURE �
✓ Administrative Staff Review.
Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer.
Pubfic hearing before the Planning Commission.
Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a
recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be
held by the City Council.
APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS
All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the
Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications
submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be
returned. The Planning counte�closes at 4:00 PM.
Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. �ne (1),
8'/z" x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or
administrative decision. Aeplication with unfolded maps shall not be accepted.
The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the
apPlication and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter
submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted
materials are required.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Applicabon Conference Notes Page 8 of 9
Residential Appfica6oNPlaruiirg Oiv�sion section
� The administrative decision or public hearing will pically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an
application is accepted as being complete by the�lanning Division. Applications involving di�cult or
protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review.
Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public
hearing. A 10-day public appeal periQd follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter
would be heard by the Tigard N�H��►��; 0�',ce.c- . A basic flow chart
which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request.
Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the
applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing.
This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE
INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code
requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff
and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the
site.
SUBDIYISION PLAT NAME RESERVATION [Coanty Surveyor's O�ice: 503-648-88841
PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A SUBDIVISION LAND USE APPLICATION with the City of Tigard,
applicants are required to complete and file a subdivision plat naming request with the Washington
County Surveyo�'s Office in order to obtain approval/reservation for any subdivision name.
Applications will not be accepted as complete until the City receives the faxed confirmation of
approval from the County of the Subdivision Name Reservation.
BUILDING PERMITS
PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR
REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by
the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of
development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the
Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is
recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are
building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as p�oposed.
Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be
demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that
structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the Cit 's olic is to a I those s stem
development credits to the first buildinqpermit issued in the development (UNL OTHER ISE
DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED).
e con erence an no es canno cover a o e requiremen s an aspec s re a e o
site planning that should ap pl to the development of .your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide
information required by the C�e shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements.
It is recommended that a pros�pectiye applicant either obtain and read tl�e Community Development Code or
ask any questions of City staif�relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application.
AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN
APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A
PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as
unnecessary by the Planning Division).
PREPARED BY: �-�R �I�
fITY OF TIGARD PIANNI G DIYISION - STAfF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP. MEETING
PHONE: (503) 639-4171 FAIL• (503) 684-]241
E-MAIL• (swfl:r�c�me)@a.tigard.or.us
TITLE 18((In Of TIGARD'S C4MMUNITY DEYELOPMENT CODE)INTERNET ADDRESS: www.ci.tigard.or.OS
H:lpattyUnasterslPr�App Notes Residential.doc Updated: 26-Jun-02
(Engineering secGon:preapp.eng)
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 9 of 9
r�d�,n�nvpr��no��a�,s�
� HALSTEAD'S
A R BO R I C U LTU R E ��Specialists in the care and
preservation of trees"
� CONSULTANTS, INC.
' �� David Halstead,Consultant,B.S.
Phillip Whitcomb,Consultant
; � P.O. Box 1182•Tualatin,OR 97062
�' (503)245-1383
i ��
�, �
f;._..�
A.� �.
March 22, 2004
'' Gertz Construction
ATTN.: Mr. Ken Gertz
� 19200 SW 46`h Avenue
� � Tualatin OR 97062
/
� Reference: Tree Assessment
i Location: 11480 SW Fonner Street, Tigard, Oregon
Subject: City of Tigard Tree Mitigation & Preservation Report
�
" , With your approval, we have inspected all trees on the site located on the east
� � � and south side of Fonner Street, Tigard, Oregon and the site plan for the
; proposed development.
� The purpose of the inspection and tree assessment was to identify and evaluate
; � the preservation potential of all trees six inches in trunk diameter(measured at
four feet above ground) and farger under the forthcoming construction in
� � ` accordance with the City of Tigard's Tree Ordinance Chapter 18.150.
.,
We have tagged and numbered all trees, on the site plan, in the field and in this
' � � � report using corresponding numbers as they exist in the °Tree Table" on the site
plan. Our numbers are P58101 through 110, 240 through 251 and 303 through
� 312. In addition, tag 108 "A" is used for a tree that is not on the site plan and is
� over six inches in diameter. Site plan and field statistics numbered 244 "N" and
� 245 "N" are neighboring trees that will be affected by the forthcoming
construction and will need to be protected during the building phase. The first
I tree number starts on the west center of the property and continues north, east,
� � �+ south, west and north aga'rn.
;
�' TREE ASSESSMENT:
� � There are a total of thirty-three (33) trees located within the project boundaries.
�� Six(6} trees are less than finrelve inches in trunk diameter measured at four feet
above ground and are not required to be part of the City of Tigard's "Tree
� Mitigation Identification Program." This leaves a residual of twenty-seven (27)
':� � trees that are finrelve inches in trunk diameter and larger. Two (2) of the trees,
' � twelve inches in trunk diameter and over, are haza�dous and need to be removed
�� and are not required to be part of the City of Tigard's "Tree Mitigation
Identification Program". In addition, two (2) of the neighboring trees will be
� impacted by the construction and need to be protected.
i
'Email: hac@spiritone.com
www.halsteadsarboriculture.com
�CBft 0068646
�:�
_�
r-
�
r
��
'� Page 2
�
March 22, 2004
Reference: Tree Assessment
; Location: 11480 SW Fonner Street, Tigard, Oregon
; Subject: City of Tigard Tree Mitigation � Preservation Report
; The forthcoming table will consist of TR# (tree number), Species (common �
� botanical name), Dia DGL (diameter at ground level) HGT (height of tree), LMB
' (diameter of limb spread), HLT% and STR%{(rated 20%-80%) 40% or less is
, dead/dying and/or uncorrectable}. 40% to 70% will require pruning and cabling}.
; REM {(brief comments and recommendations). If more details are needed they
will be within the enclosed individual field statistics sheets}.
Trees on site under 12" in diameter at 4.5 feet above ground and/or are
� considered as hazardous are numbered:
' TR# Species Dia DBH Dia DGL HGT LMB SPD HLT%
STR% REM
------ ----- ----- ------- ------
_______ ______ _______ __________
102 V-mapie 3X5" 16° 20' 20' 70 30 Hartree
� Acer cir�inatum
;
107 W-cherry 09" 20" 50' 30' 70 30 Haztree
Prunus
' 243 D-fir 11° 20" 70' 20' fi0 30 Hartree
Pseudotsuga menziesii
i
� 308 WR-cedar 08" 16" 50' 20' 60 60
Thuja plicata
309 WR-cedar 07" 09" 50' 10' 40 60
Thuja plicata
,� 312 D-fir 07" 12" 20' 25' 40 30 Haztree
Pseudotsuga menziesii
--.�
,.,
�
. � �
i
,
�
_�
�° :
,_
�
��� Page 3
March 22, 2004
Reference: Tree Assessment -
.. � Location: 11480 SW Fonner Street, Tigard, Oregon
I Subject: City of Tigard Tree Mitigation 8 Preservation Report
i
Trees that are larqer than 12 inches in diameter are as follows
�
� TR#_Species Dia DBH Dia DGL HGT LMB SPD HLT% �
_____ STR/o REM
---- ------ ----- ----- -------
----- ----- -------------
------- ------ ----------
' 101 D-cedar 20" 30° 70' 30' 60 60
Cedrus deodard
103 OR-maple 19" 26" 50' 60' 80 60 Exceptional
{ Or�gon Big Leaf maple
104 M-cypress 14" 18" 60' 20' 6Q 60
; Monter�y cup�ssus
105 WR-cedar 29" 51" 75' 40' 70 40 Co-dominant
Thuja plicata
106 C-redwood 64" 87" 90' S0' 80 70 Exceptional
? 3�c�iit'iia �ciirNci viie��5
�
108 WR-cedar 19" 26" 70' 30' 70 30 Hartree
,; Thuja plicata
"108Au D-fir 23" 29" 90' 40' 60 70
� Pseudotsuga menziesii
109 D-fir 39" 42" 110' 60' 70 80 F�cceptional
s� Pseudotsuga menziesii
�
�
�
4
�
.�
_�
�-
�
�
Page 4
�� March 22, 2004
Reference: Tree Assessment
-� Location: 11480 SW Fonner Street, Tigard, Oregon
Subject: City of Tigard Tree Mitigation � Preservation Report
TR# Species Dia DBH Dia DGL HGT LMB SPD HLT% STR% REM
! ____ ______ ______ _____ _____ _______ ______ _______ __________
110 WR-cedar 32" (Thuja plicata) 47" 70' 40' 60 40
� Co-dominant and included bark area. Recommend pruning and cabling.
240 D-fir 32" 49" 100' '
45 80
70
� Pseudotsuga menziesii
241 D-fir 24" 38" 100' 40' 70 60
Pseudotsuga menziesii
;
242 0.fir 23" 37" 90' S0' 50 50
Pseudotsuga menziesii
244 D-fir 27" 4fi" 100' 6Q' S0 50
Pseudotsuga menziesii
"244Nu D-fir 19" 28" 90' S0' 60 60 Neighbor
,
Pseudotsuga menziesii
245 WR-cedar 23" 35" 80' 40' S0 70
,
Thuja plicata
"245N" D-fir 42" 67" 110' 70' 80 70 Neighbor
Pseudotsuga menziesii
�� 246 D-fir 40" 57° 100' 70' S0 60
Pseudotsuga menziesii
�� 247 D-fir 25" 34" 90' 30' 60 70
Pseudotsuga menziesii
' 248 WR-cedar 45" 68" 90' S0' 70 60
� Thuja plicata
�
t
�
�
�
W�
�
�� Page 5
March 22, 2004
Reference: Tree Assessment
=-� Location: 1148Q SW Fonner Street, Tigard, Oregon
i Subject: City of Tigard Tree Mitigation 8 Preservation Report
TR# Species Dia DBH Dia DGL HGT LMB SPD HLT% STR% REM
I ____ ______ ______ _____ _____ _______ ______ _______ __________
249 WR-cedar(Thuja plicata) 18" 29" 70' 30' 70 60
; Recommend above ground inspection and corrective measure taken.
�
250 WR-cedar 35° 51" 90' S0' 70 60
' Thuja plicata
;
;
251 WR-cedar 19� 28" 80' 40' 70 60
� Thuja plicata
,
303 WR-cedar 32" 46° 90' S0' 70 30 Haztree
-, Thuja plicata
304 A-cedar 18° 20" 90' 50' 60 50
,
Cedrus at/antica
i
305 WR-cedar 21° 41" 70' 40' 70 70
,
Thuja plicata
306 WR-cedar 19" 30" 50' 30' 70 60
Thuja plicata
;
, 307 WR-cedar 2X22° 27" 50' 30' 70 40
Thuja plicata
� 310 WR-cedar 20" 30" 90' 40' 60 60
Thuja plicata
�� 311 WR-cedar 13" 23" 60' 25' 70 40
Thuja plicata
�
�
�
m�
�
;Y« .
�
�� Page 6
� March 22, 2004
Reference: Tree Assessment
Location: 11480 SW Fonner Street, Tigard, Oregon
! Subject: City of Tigard Tree Mitigation 8� Preservation Report
Tree Care and Preservation Guidelines:
' There are thirteen (13) exceptional trees located on this site that have had little or
no professional care and they suffer from past storm damage and neglect.
; Structural and deadwood pn.ining will be required and needs to be completed
-! before construction and site clearing in order to provide safety to surrounding
person and property. These trees are rated from 40°� to 70%.
, Neiqhborinq trees:
; There are two (2) large trees just over the east property line that will require tree
, root zone protection during the construction phase.
, Tree Care and Preservation Guidelines:
Before construction begins, atl of the preserved tree root zones will need to be
protected by the installation of orange colored Tree Protection Fencing out to the
i r.anapy dripii�i� r�f preserved iree. r=encing needs to be attached to 7-foot tall
steel fence posts placed eight feet apart on center forming a protective line
around the preserved trees and fence posts need to be securely ancho�ed in the
soil to a depth of two feet. The fencing, as described, will need to be maintained
throughout the entirety of the project.
Any work within the protected area and/or ir the fencing needs to be adjusted due
to hardscape construction, it will first require the approval and on-site supervision
by the consulting arborist.
;�
� Arboriculture technicians working within the trees will also need to inspect the
; trees very carefully to make sure that preserved trees are well prepared for the
forthcoming construction. Due to the large and massive root zones#herapeutic
'� fertilization may be necessary for the preserved trees in order to assure they
survive the forthcoming construction trauma.
,
i
_J
_��
�
..._� .
_�
_�
r-�
�
�
Page 7
A� March ???, 2004
Reference: Tree Assessment
, Location: 11480 SW Fonner Street, Tigard, Qregon
j Subject: City of Tigard Tree Mitigation 8� Preservation Report
;
Hazardous tree removal within project boundaries needs to be completed in a
' careful manner as to not damage any preserved tree. Any tree or existing stump
' removed within 15 feet of a presenred tree needs to have the stump groundout
,
rather than excavated in order to reduce root trauma.
i
. Sincerely,
David Halstead BS CA
ASCA
CC.: SFA Design Group
ATTN.: Mr. Matthew Spraque
9020 SW Washington Square Drive
Suite 350
� Portland, OR 97223
Ph 503.641.8311
�;� 503.5�+3.i 5^uss
s
:�
;�,,
�
�
F�
�
.�
���-•��•�+.+ a.�ar�ovRn.uL�u�tt VUNSULTANTS
� . TREE CHARACTERISTICS GUIDE
,� ��-� ���� :.
Tree Number:�Jl�3pecies: � Botanical:
? DGL: ,�DBH:,,,�Trun :___,�__Height;_�,j�Dia Lmb Sprcf: �
i
' Crown Class: Dominant: Co-Dominant: Included:
Special:Specimen: Historic: Street Tree:
, Indigenous:� -
� Health Rating:�Strudure Ratir�g:�Root Structure Rating:�(20°6-409�b Haztree--5�9�6-70°�
� requi�s profesional care)
� '' Pruning History: Pro Care: Crown Reduced:_Flush Cuts:_Topped:
.�
' QDIrN�'1�indc�ls pia��enoeaf i�dridld de�ecl5 aM�ale�heiraeus�(s=se�we.m=moderal�.l=low)
,,
�.T �R� 7'� �� �
_ ; �
; � . -
faci�ed bit
�e�d .
�
11�F�an
f�IQlip�irt�i�dat _
�a�r - -
too�cien b�rk
Mdel6�el�re ..
De�i�oo�ie5s
F�erio�sfiiae
��Q�
����b� � Finepob�iik 1-iD�2-me�R3-��-9eMe►
, �����..� � � s��� ,-�c��2-�-,�-���,r
F�Pioraaiot+Sad +Tipetiyi�=fYad�wB 3-1R.,�t1'(45�75cmk4-�"(15cm)
�+�+�_� �'ipetdwg 3=aora�io�l�2��us�
{ HAZARD ABATEIMENf
Pnwe: �rernwe detecftv�a pa�t ❑red�ce end weipht L��vw�de� �'it�in L�canopy O aown roduce D restrucdtre 0 shepe
, �'�� ia'edf�fMr: ❑root aawn L7� ❑ae�l O mo
, �
Remove tree: Y f,�jy ReP Y� More leryet Y� Olber.
Ef(eat on ad�eceot tree� T9'none L7 evaluate
, MotlNealta� ❑owner D mar�aper D go�rem�0 aoencY DN� , �
COMMENTS
�
r+�u-,�twu'�w��RIGULTURE CONSULTANTS
� , TREE CHARACTERISTICS GUIDE
Tree Number:�Species: Botanical:
�
�� DGL:�pBH: � Trunks:�_HeigM:�Dia Lmb Sprd: oCCJ
� � .� �
Crown Class: Dominant: Co-Dominant: V Included:��
; Special:Specimen:�Hfsto�ic: Streat Tree: Indigenous: -
_�
Heafth Rating:�Structure Rating:�Root Structure Rating:,�(2096-409b Haztree--50�6-7p°,6
�'; requires profesional care)
Pruning History: Pro Care: Crown Reduced:,_Fiush Cuts: V Topped:
j ---
i
f.'I�IrN�ladrale pa�enoe d i�idid defa.isaid�a�eiheirserer�l(s=se�w=moder��=1owj
�.T �!� � �� �g
�
�oR
Qodemi�vd.slloiks "'
' � . -
, lor.iudrd 6�
6aoes�ead �
ll�a�
Oo�l�an�ii�adat -
►aMr �
Loe�al�aa�M�ea 6�k
aolel6x6ire -
De�oo�s
Rarioasflise �
��
'iaap�rtmost��f� fi�epole�k 1-b�;2-�3-di�4-seYe�
�naioa �■.� e�.■�t a�er sr�.a�ac ,-�-tx;c�aX 2-sa8-c�anl:
�aimPbleafd�S�eafPaEfTi�R Wi9=l1�dR�w! 3-16ti�0"(45�5�g4-�30"(75an�
-�+ � +�_ (� T�et�1'ig 1-aac�ian�l�2�Iena�t us�
--_f Z— 3-fiBquant us�4-ca�ant use
HAZARD ABATEMEl�f
Pn� L9�o�re d��ive pert ❑redti�end waigid ❑crown de� D� 0�ise canopy ❑cxown rod��ce CI reshtia�ure O shepe
� � � r��: o�� ❑a�, a� a�
1 Remove tree: �Y N Repface? Y� More hrpe� Y ai Olber.
Eifect on adlaeeat tree� Lg"none ❑evaluate
' N� ❑owner O mana0e� �0��0�Y Dabe �
COMMENTS
;
..� �
HALSTEAD'S ARBORICULTURE CONSULTANTS
, TREE CHARACTERISTICS GUIDE
Tree Number:�Species: Botanical: �
I � -4— � .1L.4— P�'d= V�J
DGL: DBH: Trunks: Heiaht: Dia Lmb S
)
Crown Class: Dominant:�Co-Dominant: Induded:�
� Special:Specimen: Historic: St�t Tree: Indigenous: -
� Health Rating:,�Stnidure Rating:�Root Strudure RaUng:�209�6--40% Hartree--509�6-70�6
� requires profesional care)
�... Pruning History: Pro Care: Crown Reduced:_Flush Cuts: 1✓ To
PR�•
1
' �710wN�'l�ladica�pe�enx af indf�idtAl def�s and�e Their aNer�y(s=s�eie.m=modet'�1R�_�
�H.T �ifl� � �.� �g
� Pcor
(�ndoai�lfo�is
� � -
I induded bik
6eoes�aid •
11�nu�fsaan
Ou�shaasrra�slirad�t -
� -
L�eoadosdea btrf�
halel6xllire .
Dea�ao�fo�s
P�ario�sfaiere
��
iae p�t aast oody b f� fise poleeliit 1-fuw;2-aned�m�3-di�4-ee�
�n�yi.e�� e-�wd a�er sr�safptt ,-�'cl:iaar2-s�'(�;c�nk
, Faite Pbleard+Si�e�at+L�t R�iq�14Q�d i�M'w8 3-16,�0"{45�75�nx 4-�3D"(75 any
�+�{ ,-, _� Ti�et dwg 1-a�otaioa�t a9eC 2 to1aailent us�
�� 3-fiequer�t usa;4-car�nt�e
� HAZARD ABATEMENT
� a�a�r►� �e�a� ❑c�own ae� �o�a�► o�,roa� o�e o s�
� �
; 1�6ielBrs�« Iu�aet I�Mr: ❑root crorm ❑aecay ��a1 D mo
' Remove troe: � Rephcet Y� Move terpe� Y� O�er.
Hteat on aA�aceqt Iroes �ione ❑evaluate
NoUne�a: �own�,�ma�per t�s.ven,4�p � . � ' a
COMMENTS - - "
� ,
�n.L��. ��t,:�. � �cvri.��
�
ii
_..3
HALSTEADr'S ARBORICULTURE CONSULTANTS
; TREE CHARACTERISTICS GUIDE
� ,
Tree Number:�Species:� Botanical:
�����
DGL:�DBH:�Trunks:____L_HereM:�_Dia Lmb Sprcf:�
Crovm Class: Dominarrt:�Co-Domina�: Included:
_ Special:Specimen: Historic: Street Tree: � Indigenous: -
j Health Rating:�Stnadure Ratirtg:�Root Stn,cture Rating:�(20%-40%Hariree--509G-70°�
;, requires profesional ca�e)
� Pruning History: Pro Care: Crown Reduced:_Flush Cuts: 1r Topped:
�
;
,
I�DNI��.7�ladir�e pasenoe af i�idu�l defeas and�a�e tlidr se�er�(s=ss�ae.m=moder'��=lo�
�T �� � i�Ei.� �
.:_;
taodo�aio�l�ifods
�id�S . -
�iit
6�oe5�ir�aa� .
Y�e�nn
L
oai�r�aeslaadd -
►�u�r �
tnoadtraciea 6�k
halel6eebire -
Dead�oo�
6o�as1le�aie�s
Pl�erioasiai�e
�� �
Tiat pai mast fiod�b ta� fiia�e poi�nitt 1-lo�2-�3-lipl��-eeY�
�n� �ueirol.�-e'm.d abar ss af pit t-�s-{�i oak 2-sa8-(�anx
F�i�e Pio�i;SeeatPaE+Tiyet R�i'i�=lf�d 3-16ti�D"'(4�75cmX 4-�30r'(75 an)
�+ � +�_= r�� y¢t r,fig 1-aac�sia�l�2 irl�illnt us�
_]�r--- 3-irequer�t use;4-canstant use
' HAZARD ABATEiNE1�T
Pnro� 0 remwe defedWe part D c�ed��oe end weipht D crown cla� �'a' �r�se canopy �crorm nduce ��ecdua ❑st�ape
� � �t I�1Mr: O mot aawn �dacay �ae�l O mo
' Remove tree: Y � Repf�ce� Y � More h�peC Y� Olhac
� Htect on ad�aceat trees @'none 0 eva(
NMItk� ❑owner D manaper �'povem�0 80encY Dq� ��(.�'/
COMMENTS
1 r ...�.�
' 1
��� ,���� .��. ���� .,�n���
`�
HALSTEAD'S ARBORICULTURE CONSULTi4NTS
�. TREE CHARACTERISI'ICS GUIDE
Tree Number: �� Species: Botenical:
�
DGL:�DBH: � Trunks: �Height:�Dia Lmb Sprd;�
1
Crown Class: Dominant: Co-Dominarit: Induded:
Special:Specimen: Histo�ic: Street Tr+ee: Indigenous:„�. -
Heaith Rating:�Strudure Ratirtg: "1 b Root Structure Rating:�(20%-40°� Haztree--50%-70°6
requires profesional care)
Pruning Histary: Pro Care: Crovm Reduced:_Flush Cuts:�apped: �
I
I'J10111�f�7fi t�dr�e pesenoediMridi�i defeclsa�d�ale�raaar�l(s=seyae.m=a�ade�'aE�1=low?
, � rW� � � �
Oods�ifo�s
( aN�cba�ls . -
Iaduidlpdc
6aoessirea� �
i
�
� - �
��
�� .
��
' 60�
R�iousf�e
, ��
fiae pataa�tlioe�t�iat fi�e poie�tk 7-forr;2-a�9-li��1-eeM�
, Y�pediow Psio�S�aiwuol 6�1 ohr 5iee d p�t 1-�B'('!'i qa);2-6�'(t5�5 dnx
F�e Pnlanial+ Pat+Ta�et R�i�=fl�d R�fws 3-fi��0'(�5-?5 anjC 4-�30"(75 an)
�+ � +�-� Ti�et tal"i¢ t-oo�io�d a�2 iMdmilent t�
3-fieQuent uce;4-canstant use
HAZARD ABATEMEI�T
r� �r�nore a�e p�: (�r.a�oe ene w�ht o«own c�, [�Ure� ��se c�opy► a cxow�ieauoe ❑restru�ue o st�pe
CaYeJBrae� -1�� I��sd f�qMr. aown ❑decay O aetial ❑mo
' Remove Uee: Y I�y Repiace� Y � Move terpeC Y� Other. ��.���- � �--,
Etleat an ad�aceet tree� none ❑evaluate
Notlt�llo� O awnec �ma�per @'ov�wa in0 apenc�+ Dtt� Q
COMMENTS
HALSTEAD'S qRgORICULTURE CONSULTANTS
t� , TREE CHARACTERlSTICS GU1DE
, : � ,
Tree Number:_�_gp��eS: " Botanical: �dy�.�
°` / � J� ����
� DGL:�DBH:_f'a L/Trunks:�_HeigM:�^Dia Lmb Sprd:�
�T
Crown Class:Dominant: Co-Dominarrt: InGudeci;
. ; Special:Specimen: Historic: Stneet Tree: Indigenous:,� -
Health Rating:�Strudure Rating: �!J Root Struciure Ratin ��(
� requires profesional care) g� 2Qg6-4096 Hariree--509G-70�6
>
Pruning History:Pro Care: Crown Reduced:_Flush Cuts:,�Topped:
,
,
3
t
; I,�D11N�ladir�e prasenoe af i�id��l defeds ad�e tl�eir aa+�e��►(s=s�i�m=moderate.�=b�
a � �il� � �6 �
, Pbor
Oudoaiia�s
� . -
loduded b�d�
6eoe�tad .
�
fbaliaa�irra�iaid�t
�r - .
Eao�ekr�rlea tart
Wodfixlwe � ,
Dea�uo�b�p5s
6aadlmmies�
Ftiuriousfiie�e �
��
TiaePutaas��rtoL� fiuepolsMitk 1-fuM;2-a�ed�3-di��-eeM�
�ne�o�..�aA.ual e-�d o�aer sr�afp�c 1-as-cf5aar2-s�8-{�5ank
f'aTuePbk�l+Si�d +Ti�etRiiq�fl�edR�ing 3-16+3Q'(�75aa�k4-a30"(75an)
' +�,��_ L.� 5�t+�"w� 1-aocsaaroi os�2 iNam�mnt ts�
---�--- 3-fr�quent use;4-corista�t use
HAZARD ABATEMENT
Pn� ❑�emove d�e part L7 redu�ae end weight ❑c�own dean ❑it�n B'�Ce c�nopy ❑cro�+m�eduoe �restruc4ua 0 st�epe
� i�ad f�IMr. ❑roat dawn ❑
�Y ❑�I �mo
Remove hee: Y N Repfece� Y N Movs teryeC Y N Otber.
Hleat on ad�aceat trees: 0�fone p evaluate
MoUtiadlo� L7 owner �manager �vemk�0 apencS► Dtl� � � �
COMMENTS
_ �--�� .�..� ��
a .�
�
�
HALSTEAD'S ARBORICULTURE CONSULTANTS
. TREE CHARACTERlSTICS GUIDE
Tree Number:,�,�Species: Botanical:
DGL:�DBH:__�__Trunks:____�___ ei�ht:�Dia Lmb Sprcl: ��
Crown Ciass: Dominant: V Co-Dominarrt: Included:
Special:Specimen: Historic: Street Tnee:�ndigenous: -
Heaith Rating:�Strudure Rating:�Root Siruciure Rating:�(20%-40%Haztree--5096-70°�6
requires profesional care)
Pruning History: Pro Care: Crown Reduced:_Flush Cuts:_Topped:
�7p1��7�In6cals passioe af i�idui de(a.i5alld labe�eiraaier�►(s=serae.m=a�oder�l��=lo�
�.T �� 7� �� �IB
t�o�oaii�lro�s
a� . -
facfu�ed 0ad�
Ezoessiread �
�
�r�iiradet -
�va � �
looselbadea htik
Molel6eeliire �
� _ Dead�a�odF.�s
'_ F�iousf�e
��� �
Traepstaast�tofrt '' fiiarepale�at 1-bw;2-medu�3-li��-BeMa
�n� aa■ar�ei�l al�er sr�s af pat �-ds-c�,aa�2-s-�'(�-�anr
r�e�+saaf�,rt+� �t�rre� 3-i�(�amk4-�(�sanj
--�—+ ,� +�----�— ��� 3-irequentus�4?cons�ntt�se�
HAZARD
� �o�e a�� o�e ena w�onc oc�n c� o�, o�e a�o�,► oc�m�a�e o�a�x�e ❑s�
c�ae� �ranr: oroccc� o�,r oa� omo
Remove trea:� N Raphee� Y�i Move hrpet Y � �Iher.
Efleot on ad�ece�Iree� @'none �evalu
Nodtie�tfaac O owner D ma�per �goveminp epency Dal��- �� ��
COMMENTS
� � l
��� �.�� -� _ � 10� �
� � l � .
HALSTEAD'S ARBOWCULTURE CONSULTANTS
�. TREE CHARACTERISTICS GUIDE
,
Tree Number:�Species: Botanical:��_
DGL:�DBH:�Tn,inks:�_Height:�,��a Lmb Sprci:_�
. / .�
Crown Class: Dominant: 1� Co-Dominant: InGuded:
,�
Special:Specimen: Historic: Street Tree: Indigenous: �
Health Rating:�Strudure Rating: � �Root Structure Rating:,�20%-40% Haztree--50%-70�
tequires profesional care)
Pruning History: Pro Care: Crown Reduced:_Flush Cuts:_Topped:
CAOIMN�FCIg la6ca�e pesei�cs of i�idid defecls aid tie iheir saaill(S=ae�m=mode�'a1��=b�
�.T �B� 1� �i,� �
Pbor
Oodani�od6
� . -
f�ed Iqdt
6aoasi�W� �
1�
OndalaA�rra��l6aldlet �
�r � �
t,osseltra�ea h�rk
holel6�tWire .
Dea�d�oo�
8oiewflmiaies�s
P'�ari0usfiia�e
�Q�
Tieep�tmo�t�Uof�it foims paie�t 1-fow;2-med�3-li�4-sa�
lospe�i�n liaio��a�uvl �asd iier S�s af ptt 1-�(15 anX 2-6-�"(LS�S dnk
Fai�tPeiei�l+�eafPat+Ti�etR�B=tYtnd�ig 3-16ti�'(�5-75amx4-�"(75cm)
�+�+��� Ti�et�fwg 1-aocasio�da�2�us�
3-frequent u�e;4-co�trt�e
NAZARD
r� - d�e p�t �r�e�oe ena woiDnc o«own cl� D�in a�ce a�an�r o cro�m�eduoe ❑resau�u�e ❑shspe
t�61el8ra� r�ed 1sfM� �r aawn ❑d�ay ❑�ial �mo
. Rea�rne tree: � N' Replue? Y� More terpe� Y� Olher.
Eftect on ad(aceat troes C]none �uate
NoHHeatlo� ❑owner ❑n�aureper C�I9ovem�0 ape��r D�
COMMENTS
�.�.,,� _��� .,�.��. �., �-� �1� ��.. .�, ��.� .���
� � �
�� � . �-�1�2.�� ,� �,�� .
l
HALSTEAD'S ARBORICULTURE CONSULTANTS
;. TREE CHARACTERISTICS GUIDE
Tree Number. ��`� Species: Botanicat: � ,�
DGL:�DBH:�Trunks:�_Height:�Dia Lmb S :�
Crovm Class:Dominant:��Co-Dominarit: Included:
,
Special:Specimen: Historic: Street Tree: Indigenous: � �
, Heafth Rating:�rudure Rating:,�Root Strudure Rating:��(2Q96-409�6 Haztree--5096-7p°�6
requires profesional care}
Pruning History: Pro Care: Crown Reduced: Flush Cuts:_ToppeQ:
�
fx10N1��l�I a�cale p��se�ioe af iMf�idip�l debcfs ad�ab�eir aara�►�►(s=sere�4 m=+eodm'�e.!_loiw)
�:T �� 1� �� �3
Plo�or
, .� L
�aa�i�
' � - -
i�fu�md mit
6eoess+�aid �
11�Odsf�e■a
� -
�r �
tooseiEra�ea�sk
Molelt�xiwe _
Deadrraod�
6o�aaiimi�ies�s
t�iot�fiie�e
��� .
Tiee p�rt most Rody!�f� faia�e polan�tk 1-IoMr.2-med�C 3-li��-�
�Pa� �ad bi�i arier ��� 1-�'(�i aar 2-6�8"(t5�5 cmr
hitt P�d i S�e +Ti�eR R�=EI�N I�i�9 3-i6,40'(4�r?5 aa�X 4-�3D"(75 an)
---�---+--�—+�°� ���� 3-irequerttuse;4?oonstantuse�
HAZARD ABAfEMENT �
�« o���c o��a w�nc �,� t�o�e�, o�� a�sa„aure as�
�1� iared idM�: ❑�oa aown o ae�ay ❑�ai ❑mo
Remove iroe: Y � Replace? Y � Move h�pe� Y � Othe�
Efleat an ad�aceat tree� �`none ❑evaluate
� o o� o� ��,��,► n,� - l 0
coMMEars
_ �;� � � `��°v� -�'�.�,� .���� `� �
I � �
HALSTEAD'S ARBORICULTURE CONSULTANTS
� , TREE CHARACTERISI7CS GUIDE
Tree Number:,��Species: . Botanical:
' � ...� ____l._ � .�ll� �:.�
I. DGL: DBH: Trunks: He' M: Dia Lmb S
Crown Class: Dominant:�Co-Dominarrt: Induded:
_j Special:Specimen:�Historic: Stneet Tree: �O Indigenous: � �
� Health Rating:�Strudure Rating:�Root Strudure RffiIng:�(2096-40°6 Haztree--50%-70%
requires profeslonal care}
Pruning History: Pro Care: Crovm Reduced:_Flush Cuts:_Topped:
�
�
, 4'ADIMN�.7�in�pess�d in�idid defecls aid rale��o�eri�l(s=s�rae.m=aiodd'rAe.1=1�
' �T �i� � �/i �
i Pbor
� . -
h�ttu�ed 6�
Gmessirea� �
Il�aod�lsa�n
Oo�a�li�add -
� �
Eaoaa�Qa�iea h,rk
aolelf�eelire .
Deaiwoo�
Prariousiiise
��
Tieep�rtmost�ylufat f9ie�epob�et 1-brr;2-med�3-di�4-seYe�
I�lioa paiad�a�uai ti�ai aai S�s af ptt 1-�'(15 aa�2-6�8'(t445 anx
FaTarePbinM'd+SS�eaf +T�yatR�in�=tf�dl4fii� 3-16�0'{4'�75aak4-�"(75an)
� + I + l.�_�, Ttqet ni�1-aaasia�a!ts�2 iniaa�d us�
3-irequettt use;4-c�M use
HAZARD ABATEMEHT
r'n� �re�nove aeisc�ve p�t dd"n�cs ena waipld o aow�cle�n �'4�i� ❑�Se cmopy ❑crown reauce �restrucbu�o 0 shepe
! t�MeJBrae� In�sd I�dMx: ❑roat craMm ❑dacay ❑aaial ❑mo
� Remove tree: Y � R�SCe� Y � Move le�pe� Y I� Otbar.
i Eifeat on ad(acaM tree� one ❑evatuate
N� ❑owner O managar L�oven►1�9 aperwY Dat� � �
COMMENTS
� ���
HALSTEAD'S ARBORICULTURE CONSULTANTS
.. TREE C ARACTERISTICS GUIDE
Tree Number: � ld Spacies: Botanical: U! �
DGL:�DBH: ��Trunks:.�Height:�Dia Lmb Sprd:�
Crown Class: Dominarrt: Co-DominaM: V induded: ,
Special:Specimen: Historic: Street T�+ee: Indigenous: -
Health Rating:�Strudure Rating: `�� Root Structure Rating:�(209�0-40°� Hartree--5096-70°�
requires profesional care)
Pruning History: Pro Care: Crown Reduced:_Flush Cuts:_Topped:
r�lOwN ae�r��mic�s pa�enoe d i�idwl aefeds ad�a1e tlidr ae�e�jr ts=se�e�e.m=moaeral�1=la�w)
� ��� � �� �
Oo�o�liorYs
� . -
bcfudedb�k
6�e�d ' .
1�
I�aNioA�lrt�si6�ad�t -
�r -
L�DOSeI�h�rk
6olellr�elire .
DeadNaodfsin5s
P�iousii�e .
��n�
Tiaep�rtmo6t�ad�►tobt fiisepul�fet 1-bw;2-a�3-di��-eeMet
kspediaa paio� anaid e�wd dier Si�s t#pit 1-�'(�i aux 2-6�(�cmx
Faiore Phaiat+Saat Pat+T�qat RiinD=i��rd Fbfi� 3-16ti�0'(45a5�k 4-a30i"(75 an)
�+�+�_� Tt�pet�� t-aoa�ia�nl os�2 ia�il�us�
3-irequertt use;4-conslant use
HAZARD ABATEMEI�T
Ptu� ❑remove derec�e aart duce end weight ❑«own eban �❑raice pnopy o a�owo reduce �r�U�x�te 0�epe
C�YelBra� ie�et trd�r. O mat aown ❑decay ❑ae� �mo
� Remove tree: Y Replace4 Y I� More brpet Y� Olber.
' Ef(ect oa adJaceM traes none ❑eval ,
NodNcatlo� �owner �mana0� ��'���0�7+ �
COMMENTS
�
� � ��� �M�� l Q,
: �
� -
HALSTEAD'S ARBORICULTURE CONSULTANTS
; � TREE CHARACTERISTICS GUIDE
i �: -
Tree Number:�Qc,-� v Species: Bot�nical:
^� i
; DGL•�,DBH: � x Trunks:�_HeigM: J Dia !.m Sprd:�
Crown Class:Dominarrt: '✓ Co-Dominant: Included:
, Special:Specimen: Historic: Str+eet Tree: Indigenous:� �
Health Rating: f��Strudure Rafing:�Root Stn,cture RaUng:,�(2096-40;G Hartree--5096-70%
` � requires profesional car�e) - -
Pruning History: Pro Care: Crown Reduced:_Flush Cuts: Topped:
�
�
. Q10MI�1�7�in�rale pa�of i�idu�l defeds and�a�e lhek aa�l(s=sr�aa.m=moder�te.I=1ow�
� OB�� IIOR� 11� � �IB
Peor
Oodeaiia�slfod�
� - -
' laduded b�
6aoes�ee�d � L
;
1�6u�f9e■n
O�i�ia�ir�a�lia�et °
�o�r � -
Lao�6�ft
hoialbelWire -
Dea�OO�
ttieriousfiie�e
�Q�
T�ae p�rtmostooey mi�it fii■epolaeiet 1-brr,2-m�tnC 3-di�4-aeYe�
la�pedioa Paiod a�d bito�uvl aber Sfas af pit i-�"(15 anX 2-fi�8"ti5�5 qnx
Fabe Pbiei�l+S�ed +Tipet R�i�=flaa�d i�fw8 3-16.9D'(4rr75 amx 4-�30r'(75 an�
�+ � + � _� ia�et r�fwg 1-ooc�siowl�2 a�a�a�d us�
3-freQuent use;4-cot�nt use
HAZARD ABATEIMEHT
Pno� ❑�no�e ae(a:ti+�s pa�t �ra�cb ena weiyht �crown clean �'rake anopy ❑cro�wn�uce �restrt�c�ure 0 st�pe
� I��adl■��Mr: ❑mat a�awn ❑dacay �a�ia{ ❑mo
. Remove troe: Y � Re�lace� Y� Move brpet Y� Olher.
Elteat on ad�eceM tree� t�ione ❑evaluate
Nodfkaflo� �owner ❑mana0er �ovemMO eDet�cY Dt� � �
COMMENTS
. ' �,��j�,�,,�,r� -�yy� � � �'c"�_ .�1,,�b.(� �
�
HALSTEAD'S ARBORICULTURE CONSULTANTS
I , TREE CHARACTERISTiCS GUIDE
�
Tree Number:�Spe�cies: Botanical: ��
� OGL:�DBH:�Tna ks:�Height:_�?,�Dia Lmb Spnd: '7'�
Crown Class: Dominant: Co-DominaM: Included:
; Special:Specimen: Historic: Street Tree: Indigenous:,� �
Health Rating:�Strudure Rating:�Root Structur�e Rating:,�(2046-4096 Haztree--509�6-70°�6
� requi�s profesional care)
Pruning History: Pro Care: Crown Reduced:_Flush Cuts:_Topped:
�
�
� QION►N�i.7r I�d�ls pa�enoe of i�idid defe�is and�a10 U1eir sera�►(s=e�a4 lu=moderal��=10�
�LT �R� 7� �� �IB
Pba
� -
' l�r3aded 6ik
600e�si�e�d �
�
il�evm
Qo�o�rm�slirad�at -
faw - .
lmseAa�iea b�rk
holel6xlire .
Deoawao� 1--
11�io�sial�e
����
ieapitmoskli�bi� fti�epabnlbk i-fa�2-a�ed�3-di�4-aa�
Ia�pec�'ioa psio��a�roi Ma�wi aber Si�s af pat 1-�6"(S aaX 2-�r18"(�5 an�
f�araPhleei�itS� PaEtTi�et�R�iq=tiaiidf0i'i� 3-idti9D"(4�75ank4-a3D�'(15an)
�_+�+ � Tt�et dw� i-oocasiad ss�2 iolaail�us�
3-f�evuenc use;a-co�m,c use
HAZARD ABATEIMENT
Pmox O�nrtioire de�edMe pazt 0 re�oe end wdgid ❑crown de� L�'� 0 raise cmopy O croYm reduce O restn�we D sl�epe
t�Yel&ae� �� O root aawn ❑decay ❑ae� O mo
� Remove troe: Y I� Replace? Y fl� Move terpet Y � Olher.
Hfect on ad�aceM tree� L�]"rtone ❑evai
NodN� ❑owner �martaper �govem�p aper�cy D�
COMMENTS
,
o �� � �� ��— j ��
� �
HALSTEAD'S ARBORICULTURE CONSULTANTS
i � TREE CHARACTERISTICS GUIDE
; ' �
Tree Number:_,��1..�Species: Botanicat: •
�
DGL:�DBH:�Trunks:�_HeigM:,�Dia Lm Sprd:� U
Crown Class: Dominant:�Co-Dominarrt: Included:
, Special:Specimen: Historic: Strest Tree: Indigenous: -✓ �
� Health Rating:�Stnadure Rating:�Root Struciure Rating:�(2096-40°� Haztree--50'X,-7096
� requires profeslonal care)
`�
Pruning History: Pro Care: Crown Reduced:_Flush Cuts: Topped:
�ON►N�Indica�p�sei�x d i�idid defeclS and�abD tlleirae�erx71(s=se�m=apde�'al��=10�
�.T �i� � �.� �
Pbor
' � . -
' inciu�ed b�dc
6eoessirtad �
l�benlf'fsa�m
LbaiQlk�l�r�sli�ad�t �
,`.vMr � �
Eoodarkiadea b,rk
IioieAt9eMire �
Dead�oo�
l4e�io�t�ieie
�0� �
Tna paR�ast ilmy tu f�it f�aia�e pole�a�at 1-lorr,2-n�8-li�4-ee�Na
k�pedi�psio� a�d ti�l o�er S�D af pit 1-�(15i cmX 2-fi�B"{15�5 dox
FaiRe Pnleaial+S�eaf Pat+Tipet R�'i�=1Y¢a�d Idii�
3-16�.�"'(4�75�nk 4-�30"(TS an)
�+.�_+ -� _� ��� 3-irequent use;4?cot�mnt use�
HAZARD ABATEMENT
�: o��� �a�nc o«�� � �► a«�� o�� o�
' caYel�so� b��: ❑roat crown ❑de�, ❑a�t o mo
Remove tree: Y jl� Repfaee . Y� Move hr�e� Y � Olher.
E11eat oa ad�eceat tro� none �evayl �
N�nr� a rn� o� �''e�m��► � 3 ��
� COMMEidTS
�e.�. ,�� .�- ,�� i ° r� ' .
� �-�� �1� ,��- --�-n-
� , � , / �
►�.,�.� , -�i !�-�s-�.� .,�2, , ,��, ��� � � ��
����
HALSTEAD'S ARBORICULTURE CONSULTANTS
; �. TREE CHARACTERISTICS UtDE
Tree Number._2�.L,�1 Species: Botanical: .
! DGL:�DBH:�Tnmks:�_HeigM:_�pia Lmb SpRI: v'�V
Crown Class: Dominant: v Co-Dominant: Included:
Special:Specimen: Historic: St�eet Tree: Indigenous:� �
-e Health Rating:,�7 Strudure Ratir�g:�Root Structure Rating:�(20%-4�°6 Haztree--50%-70%
i requi�es profesional care)
:f
Pruning History: Pro Care: Crown Reduced:,+Flush Cuts:_Topped:
,
,
� �
cnON�N aB�I��ad�a p�enoe d tadNidlual aefecls and a1e 1Mir aera�►ts=seraa m=modecal�.I=low) --
�� ��� � �� �
.
�1ode■io��sifo�s
I � . -
laduid badt
E�aoessir�wd ' -
11�upd�Fse�a�
Dnaiafi��nsiiQdd -
� �
Eoo�ekrariea bik
palel6atlwe '
Dead�oodl� "
Bo�wallanies�s
P�iousf�ierc
���
ie�pirtmostood�►bi� � f�mepoledi# 1-bw;2-me�8-hi�4-ee�
laspediop pe[io� a�pvl 6� ohr S�af ptt i-�'(15 aak 2-6-16"(15��5 dnx
Fa'i�e Pbla�l+S�ed Pat+T�yeR R+iiD=It�ad Rii� 3-16,�0'(�5-75 anx 4-�30r(75 an)
�+ � +�_� Taryet r�i'ig 1-oocasional osq 2 i�Mdmile�rt us�
3-irequent use;4-co�tarrt�e
HAZARD ABATEMENT
Pnm� L�a�e deiect�e part D reduce end weqtd ❑crown de� O tlan �ratse cmopy ❑crown�ed��ce D restrucfiue ❑s�t�ape
CaMeIB�+e� I�eet 1�q� ❑roat craa�m 0 ttecay 0 aa�ial �mo
_ Remove trea: � N Rephee� Y � Move lerpet Y� Otber.
! EAeat on ad�eceat trses: �'none ❑evaluate
No�lfk� �Owner �mana0er L ovemfn0 apencS+ DatK d
COMMENTS
��,,�, ,� -�� -c��� -�� ��-�o? .�-^.
�
�o � ,
.�.:�� � ��� �.�-� ��,�--�,v-�. ..�-�.�..�;.� �
, t ' a
.���
HALSTEAD'S ARBORICULTURE CONSULTANTS
' , TREE CHARACTERISTICS GUIDE
� ..
Tree Number:=?��SRecies: Botanical:
DGL:��DBH:�Trunks:___,�_�Height:_1�,oia�mb spb:�
Crown Ciass: Dominant: V Co-Dominant: Included:
__'. Special:Specimer: Historic: Street Tree: Indigenous: / �
� Heafth Rating:�Struc:ture Rating:�Root Struciure Rating:�C�20%-40°� Haztree--50g6-70°�
\ � requires profesional care)
Pruning History: Pro Care: Croum Reduced:_Flush Cuts:_Toppect:
�
,,
� I�RONI�It�7�I Mica�e pasence af�defeds and taAe�heir�a�rd�(s=saw�m=modera6e.I=low)
� �.T ��t� � �ffi �
i
__ Rbor
Oadomi�lfod�s
� -
; I�iuded b�k
Fxoe�i�did - �
1
;
�
Oo�1�Ikaa9Mrra■esi6�adaet _
�ahr _
Loo�ara�b�rk
holsl6eehire .
Dea�oo�
Ptetiion�i�ia�e
����
'6ee part neu�st fiae�►tu fa'� fiiu�e pulm�at 1-low;2-a�rtC 3-higl�4-�eY'�
M�pedian Paio� a�d �!_.�daer Sia�af pat 1-�6'(15 cm};2-6-18'(K-�cmr
� falue Pblen�l+S�ed Pact+'fi�et Riix��F4Qad R�a6ng 3-��'('�r75 an�4-�3U`(15 anj
�+�+�_� 5gdtai"wg 3=ooc�io�nl�2�a�u�
HAZARD ABATEMENT
� ❑�a��c o��,aw�nr o«ow�c� �o�e�► o«�� o� o�
� �'� �t f�.aa�: o mo�«owfl a d�r ❑ae� ❑mo
. � Remove troe: Y � RaPlsce? Y� More terpe� Y � Olher.
i C-�ect un adjaceat tree� '�ione ❑evaluate
� `�
NouHeet�o� a owner ❑mar�aper "L�Igoveminp a�ncy Dat� � L
COMMENTS
� � . �� � �
. ���,,�-�'� .,c�, l �k.� r ��%z�.��d .:�?�v��-�-
. �� �
,
;
HALSTEAD'S ARBORICULTURE CONSULTANTS
' TREE CHARACTERISTICS GUtDE
,
Tnee Number._���'
� Species: ' Botanical:
; DGL• �
� OBH:�Trunks:____�!Iieight:,,,_„�,Dia l.mb Sprd:��
Crown Class:Dominar�t: �Co-Dominant: Induded:
Special: Specimen: Historic: Street Tnee: indigenous: � �
•°� Heatth Rating:,�Structure Rating:�Root Structure RaUng:�(20�6-4096 Haztree--50%-70°�
,; requines profesional care)
Pruning History: Pro Care: Crown Reduced:_Flush Cuts: Topped:
�; —
Q�OIIAIf�A7�Indira�e pe'ence af i�iduai deieds an�i�8�e ffieir se�a�j►(s=ae�,m=modera�t.1=lurr)
� ��� � �,� �
Pbar
Qodsa��
a�aleal� . -
indudad b�1c
6eoes�ea� .
1Mou�o�n
Oaal�sl�irr�i6�admt =
�a�r
toasekw�ied�It
I�oiM+�eA�e .
Deodrroodf�s
P�e+iinas�e �
���
�iae put mo�t�ady b fat f�e poiaut�t -1 lar�2-w�e�a�3-hTgiS 4-seY�
�pe�n�sio� aa■�I ew� a�er s�a aF p�.r 1-�s-{�;anr 2-s-1�'(�anx
' faiNeP�+�edPst+'6�getR��t1�Nf0�ng 3-16ti90"(�75cm�4-a30�[lacn+)
+ + _ �u�■�t-oocasio�nl�2�Ad�us�
3-iBquerit use;4-constant us�e
HAZARD AB,ATEM�IT
.,
r� o�a�� o��a�t o«�� ❑� o�se�r o«�� ❑� o�
' �� i�d f�r. �coac aa�+�n ❑c�y o as� �mo
t
Remove froe: Y N Replacet Y N N{ave ierpet Y N Other.
Hleat on ad�eceut trees: O none C7 evatuate ,
Notll�q� O awner �n�er �govemin0�cY De�
� COMME
"�'-�-' � � � � '�.- C�' '� -� . �
�
� ��
� �
HALSTEAD'S ARBORICULTURE CONSULTANTS
� TREE CHARACTERISTICS GUIDE
.— �:
Tree Number:,�Specfes: Botanicai:
�
DGL:�DBH:_�,Trunks:___�___Height:�Dia Lmb Sprd:�
Crown Class:Dominant:_�Co-Dominartt: Included:
Special:Specimen: Histo�ic: Street Tree: Indigenous: V -
�� Health Rating:�Strudure Rating:�,Root Structure Rating:�(20�6-40% Haztree--50%-7Q°�
requires profesional care)
Pruning History: Pro Care: Crown Reduced: Fiush Cuts: Topped:
-, — —
�
Ix10wN� lod�'a1e pie�of i�idi�i de(ed58nd�aleNleirs�er�l{s=se�e.m=moder'.�1=la�
�T �Of� 1� �� �S
Oo�femi�ifed�
al4rLiae� . -
lo�iu�ed 6�k
6eoe�ce�d �
1�F9eas�
io�r �
Laa�ekr�dea h�rt
holeN�aire .
Dea�dwoodl�s
P�e+�ioasf�iAt
����
Tieepatmostfi�biit fe�epo�iat 1-io�2-�C3-N��-�eMa
Yspadioa paia�=���anau�l �1 c�er S�e af pit i-�6'(S aar 2-6�'(15�5 cmr
FaliRePeleni�l+Smed fTi�etR�B=l�ndR�inB 3-16+.�"(�75aak4-�"(75cmy
�+�+��� T�qet�1"wg 7-ooc�iorol�2 iuk�ao�nt us�
s-trecuena use;a-cor�nt use
HAZARD ABATEMENT
r+� ❑re�oMe a�e p�t �re�oe ena wefgnc ❑crown eie�n othin �e anopy► ❑crorm roauoe �mstnxfi�ue a�pe
� CaMeJewe� Y�eet IrIMr �root�wn ❑�ay O aeri� �mo
�emove tree: Y � Repl�cs? Y � Move te�pet Y Q Otber.
Efte�t on ad�eceat trees: L9"none O eval
Notlfkallo� ❑owner D martaper I�F�IovemMO eoencY I� � b ,
COMMENTS
� � � �
�
� �)� , ��.�— t�c�,��.. �.�� �-,� I�
� � .
� HALSTEAD'S ARBORICULTURE CONSULTANTS
.. TREE CHARACTERISTICS GUIDE
i o �: �
Tree Number.�Spec�es: Botanical: .
j DGL•�DBH:!�Trunks:�HeigM: ,�� Dia l.mb SpM:,�
Crowr�Class:Dominant:,�Co-Dominarrt: InGuded:
._�
Special:Specimen:�istoric: Street Tree: lndigenous: �
� Health Rating:�Strudure Rating: l� Root Structure R�ting:�(20�b-40°� Haztree--5�96-70%
� requires profesional care)
Pruning History:Pro Care: Crown Reduced: Flush Cuts:�Topped:
�
C110111N a9�7b`ind�r:�e p�esence at�t�i deledS ald rale�eir sa�er�l(s=sa�e.m=moderai�1=1ow)
- �1.T �� � �Ai �
Pbar
Oodesi�olsl6d6
a� . -
Indudedbrt
booessiraad �
�
,
Oa�one�dmt -
`n�r
L+�o�bad�oa iark
hofelbx�we �
�
R�ioiesfiise �
���
Tiee pat mast 0oe�1n fat fai�e po�li# 1-brr.2-wed'wnC 3-Ni�4-s�et
,�ne�o� a�ea� � a�r s�ea�R.c ,-<s-�sa�r2-s-,s-C�cmr
f�Tue Pbi�ia!�S�ed Pat+T�9��D=��8 3-i6�.,�"(�5-75 ank 4-a30r(75 cmj
+ + = 59��■�1-ooc�iomi ss�2 a�ntilent us�
; 3-irequent use;4-canstant use
HAZARD ABATEMENT
R�un� ��de�ue p�t O re�d�ce�d weight ❑crt�m de� 0 ridn ❑r�se�anopy �crown ieduoe D�fina�ue ❑st�ape
' CaYeJB�aoa i��ed 1�d�: ❑roat aovm ❑der�y ❑a�al D mo
Remove tree: Y N Rsplece? Y N Mcve terget Y N Other.
�
Htea1 on ad�acent trees: ❑none ❑evaluate .
No�NaU� ❑owner D manaper �govemhip� De�x
� COMMENTS
�
� �n� . ��� �' � �. , 1 � ' a`-�
�
��
HALSTEAD'S ARBORICULTURE CONSULTi4NTS
�. TREE CHARACTERISTICS GUIDE
_ j
Tree Number.�Species: Botanical: .
DGL•�DBH:�,Tninks: � Hei�ht: I G�� Dia Sprcl: ��
Crown Class: Dominant: �Co-Domina�: Included:
Special:Specimen: Historic: Street Tree: Indigenous: �/ �
� Health Rating:�Structure Rafing:�Root Structure RB�tfng: 2�t?(20R�-40% Haztree--50%-70%
; requires profesional care)
Pruning History: Pro Care: Crown Reduced: Flush Cuts:_Topped:
,� _
CIIONIN�1�I�e pa��oe d�wl defeclsand iaAe�eirsa�a�l(s=se�ae.m=made�'a1e.�=bw�
i �� ��� 7� �� �
Pbor
Bo�,
Oodoiai��l�S
ae�oea�t . _
f�iuded6r�t
6aoa+siread ' �
IIM�a�en
t�alpa�irra�iiradiat -
�aw . . �
loosalbsled 6�rk
poielb�eA�e .
De�oodl�n5s
F�iousi�ise
����
iae p�rtmo�oar�/tuiit � faiise pols�itk 1-l0�2-md�it�3-di��-80�6i
Y�pedioq pe�io� a�ol ti�wl aber SFet af pat i-a�'(15 tmX 2-G�8"(�Cntk
� Fala�PbiaiM'd+S�aeafPatfTay�R�=N�d1�fi�8 3-16+9D"(�'r75ank4-a30"(15dn)
�+�+�3� T�qet�fwg 7-aocs�io�nl a�2 iupaaoile�rt us�
—�t—� 3-freauent use;4-cot�ant use
HAZARD ABATEMENT
Pn� ��moYe aeta�e p�c ed�oe end weipht ❑cro�cle� 8fii o�te arap�► o aorm reduce �resWcdue 0 st�pe
CaYeJe�ao� rq�set f�der: ❑root cmrm ❑decay ❑ae�ial O mo
Remove troe: Y � Replace? Y� Move hrpet Y�N Oqier.
� Htect on ad�ece�tree� none 0 evaluate
N� o owner l7�r u�'gO�em�D�v � � �
COMMENTS
�, , � � � ,
vti � � . ..�-�, .,� ��� �^�,�� .��:�-�C�� I f�'�.�r�?
��
� � �.� ��
' r �
�� �� .�n � .�.. �
- j HALSTEAD'S qRgORiCULTURE CONSULTANTS
� TREE CHARACTERIS77C,5 GUIDE
Tree Number:l���L gPecies: . Botanical:
' DGL:�DBH:_�Trunks:_�
� H�9M-�.Dia Lm
���
Crown Class; Dominant:�Co-Dominar�t: Included:
Speaal:Specimen: Historic: Street T�+ee:___w_�ndigenous:� -
Health Rating:��ru�{u�Ratir�g:�R���ure Rating:�(209�--4096 Hariree--5096-70�6
w� requi�s profesional care) 9 4 �
� Pruning History: Pro Care:�Crown Reduced:_Flush Cuts:_Topped:
C1101��IMicale pasenca d M�idiwl defecls and�s�e iheir sa�at�r(s=sere�4 m=moderal�,1=lo�
� 1�� 1� �� �
. f�ndea�is�l9lfod�
� _
lodu�ed 6�
6aoe�i�ad .
11�andsfsetm
��
�ow� -
tooselbaded b,rk
aoielbxhiie
�eaiNOOdFrin�s
; 8o�ewl�n�
� Reriousfaie�e
��Q�
Tae P�rt�ost�tufa� feie�epubniat 1-l0�;2-m�3-lipl�4-ee�
�Pa� sod_���i ober S�afpit i-�"'(15aaX2-6-f8'(1�Spnr
F�ne P�oieniai+�edPat+'fiqet t�9=Fl�d ibi� 3-i6.�0"p5-75 anX 4-�30P'(75 an)
�_+�_+�_� y�� 1-oocaioed t�2 i�ia�oibnt us�
3-fieQuent use;4-coc�nt use
' HAZARD ABATEMEKT
r�: a���c o��a�nt ❑aow�ae� �o�se�► o�� o�m�e as�
� .
�sd r.a�: o roo�crown ❑d�y, ❑a�1 o mo
Remore tres: Y(� Repfacs? Y � Nlove ttrpe� Y�-- Olber.
Htect on ad�aceat traes: '�'tione ❑evaluate
Notlfieatia� CJ owner D n�au�aper �veminp apencY Dtt� V� �
COMMEHTS
� � � I 0
� � � ) ���n
�
HALSTEAD'S ARBORICULTURE CONSULTANTS
� TREE CHARACTERISTICS GUIDE
, Tree Number:,�Species: Botanical:
i OGL:�DBH:�Trunks:�Height: � Dia Lmb Sprd:�
Crown Class: Dominant: V_Co-Dominarit: Included:
� Special:Specimen:_�Historic: Street Tree: Indigenous:_� -
� Health Rating:�Strudure Rating:�Root Structure R�t1ng:�(20%-40�G Haztree--509�-70°k
requires profesional care)
Pruning History: Pro Care: Crown Reduced:,�Flush Cuts:_Topped:
CAOMIN�R7�In6r�e pn�ioe d i�id�Wl daieelssid iale iheirae�er�/�s=serae.m=mode�'a1e.i=bwI
�HBT �WCf� 7� �.� �
Pbor
i�om�dslfe�
ai�oel� - -
Nici�ded hod�
baoa�ad �
IIMam�F9e�
Oo�aliaa#ra�nslind�t -
�r -
L+oaadbradea h�l�
aoielbae Iwe .
�eadwoo�
Pte�ious4ise
���
ieeputmost�►tufat f�i�epalanlbk 1-fu�;2-a�9-dip1�4-eeYe�
M�pedioa Psio� anard ti�wl dier Sra af prt 1-�G'(�'i amr 2-6-�'{�45 anr
Faiwe Pnleni�i+�e d Pat+Ti�et R�1'i9=ll�d RrwB 3-16,9d'(45�5�x 4-�30r'(75 an)
�+�+�_� Tf�¢t�fw� 3-0�aqol�2�ai�us�
�����M�
� ❑�o�e a�a�e� ��ena we�nt ��n t� O�e a�+ o«�n,r�a� ❑r�e o s�e
t�6iel�ae� Mn�ed f�lUer: ❑mot auwn ❑�cay ❑a�ial D mo
Re�nove tree: � Replace� Y � Move terpe� Y (I� Otber.
�tleci on ad�eceut trees: none ❑evaluate
NotlNeatlo� f�owrtar O manaDer L ovemin0 s�encY Dtd� �
COMMENTS
� �c��m. .e�.�� ,�� �:� .� �' ��
� ° �
� /� .
HALSTEAD'S ARBORICULTURE CONSULTANTS
�. TREE CHARACTERISTICS GUIDE
Tree Number:_��Species: Botanicai: �
DGL: a � DBH:�Trunks:�,HeigM:_ �� Dia Lmb Sprd:�
Crown Class: Dominant:,�Co-Dominarit: InGuded:
Speciaf:Specimen: Historic: Street Tree: Indigenous: � -
� Health Rating:�Strudure Rating:�,Root Structure Ratlng:�(20%-40°�6 Hariree--50�6-70°k
, requires profesional care)
� Pruning History:Pro Care: Crown Reduced:_Flush Cuts:_Topped:
�
C110MIM�I�Afcale pe�iCe af il�idiW1 defeCfs and tabe tlleir sa�e�ill(s=eeua0.m=aluderatie.�=b�
; �.T �il� 7� �i �
�
� . -
i�iq�md 6�k
6e�ead �
i
ll�uand�e�
�� -
i a�r -
EAOSdEav�xs mrk
holell�e Iwe .
Dea�woodl�S
Flariodsf�ise
��
Tiae put arast Ooe�tu fa� f9i�e poAe�at 1-bM;2-a�3-di��-ee�
N�pa�ios peio�---� �an,aoi ti�l aber Si�s af pitt 1-�(�om};2-6-f6'(t4�45 dnr
f�te P�a1e�t+Srae dPat+tiyet idins=fl�d t�w9 3-i6�90'(!5-Fv�k 4-a30r'(75 a�t)
. �+�+�-� '��d�g t-oocasio�[n�2ahna�ntu�
3-ireQuent use;4-cflnstent use
HAZARD ABATEMENT
Pr� 0�ov�e d�e p�t �enu weionc �crown cb� n �ar�► o aawn�edu� o re�tr�ure ❑shepa
�61e�B� �p�eet tnfl� 0 root croNm ❑d�cay O ae�ial ❑mo
, Remove tree: Y � Repiecet Y �' Move te�pet Y � Olber.
� Etfeot on ad�eceat trees: [�'noae �evatuata
. NodtkaUon: O owner �manaper C�!'goveminp�ency D� C�
COMMENTS
-'���'� �� ��� �� �. �..%i.�.� ,� �°
� �
� HALSTEAD'S ARBORICULTURE GONSULTANTS
; � TREE CHARACTERISTICS GUIDE
Tree Number:s��Species: . Botanical:
� DGL:„�DBH:�Trunks:� HeigM:�,pia Lmb Sp�d:�
Crown C)ass: Dominant: i� Co-Dominarrt: Included:
' Special:Specimen: Histo�ic: Street Tree: Indige�ous:V , -
' Health Rating:�Strudure Rating:,�,Root Structure Rating:�(209�-4p°�6 Haztree--509b-70°k
� requires profesional c8re)
,3 _ Ptvning Histary: Pro Care: Crown Reduced:_,Flush Cuts:^Topped:
,
I,Y1011��1�indic�e p�ence af i�diridtwl defedsaid iale�eiramraiy(s=saeie�.m=modm�1=to+�
OB�T ��0� 11� �� �I�RIB
Pbor
' alddioerts . -
��
6aoe�iread •
Y�eiNl�eom
;oMr � �
LoosalFs�dea btrk
polel�xlrire .
Deo�oalFs�s
e
�� �
FIIIZARD flATRIs
fieap�rcmo�toody�nt.t fa�epol�iat 1-ior2-mad�aqs-aip��-aeMa
', i�erlia�Paiod a�u�l I�6i�1 � Sias af piR i-�{t5 qar 2-6�'(�45 cmx
falare Pbleafai+Si�e d PaR+T■�t Riiq�F4�ab� 3-id+,�"'(�?5�X 4-�30r'(75 cm)
� +�+�_� 'b�d raii�t-ooc�iqql�2 iala�t us�
3-i�equent usg;4-cat�tant t�se
HAZARD ABATEMEI�If
_____
t
Pnn� ❑�ertio+re deiedi�e pa�t �i�oe and weipid ll�rown dean LqV� O�ise carapy O cmrm roduce O roshu�ue 0 shepe
. ��'� in�ed I�IIMr. �roat aawn Cldemy ❑ao� O mo
Remove tree: Y� Re�lece? Y � Move h�pet Y� O�er.
Elfect on ad�aceM trees: one ❑evaluate
NotlNeallo�ac O owner O marta0er L�ovem�p�ncy D� � � C.�
COMMENTS
��r� v�°� �
� � �'�
. �
HALSTEAD'S ARBORICULTURE CONSULTANTS
� TREE CHARACTERISTICS GUiDE
;
Tree Number:,�,,,�Species: Botanicai:
' DGL: �f� DBH:�Trunks:___�,_,__Height: O � Oia l.mb SpM:�
Crown Class: Dominant: l� Co-Dominarit: Included:
;
Special: Specimen: Historic: Street Tree: Indigenous:,� �
�i Health Rating:�Structure Rating: ��Root Structure Rating: '�(20%-40% Hariree--509�-70°�
� requires profesional care)
� Pruning History: Pro Care: Crown Reduced:�Flush Cuts:�Topped:
�
I�ONIN�1�pn�enoe d i�idual doteds and ra�e�s�uerif(S=sarae.m=moderate.I=1a�
�f �B� 71� �� �
. Pbar
Ondon�L�ilo�
a1�loa�s -
tor,it�ed bik
6aoes4ir�e�d �
II��Fseom
� -
lnaaeRa7r.fe�ba�lt
aolelbr�e6ire .
�
P�iousfalse
���
Tiaepstaa�t�lni� Fiiwepobelfet 1-bw;2-med�a�3-li��-�
faspecloa perio�9���aaa�l d�d obar Sf�af ptt 1-�'(�i qa);2-6a8"(LS-�5 cmk
FaimeP�aleai�+SGxe fTipetR�i9=Ft�df�w9 3-i6+30"(�5a5anX4-a3�'(75an)
�+�+�_� Tiqat afii�1-oacs�io�d es�2 iniamymid ua�
3-tc�quer�t usa�4-cnr�fant use
HAZARD ABATEMEI�IT
r�ua� ❑r�o�e d�ed�e paut C�'�r�Ce�a w�hc ❑crown ci� � o ralse anopy o crawn rodu� �resma�ue 0�pe
i (��� � bqed ts1�: ❑roat aown ❑derdy D a�iat �mo
Remove tree: Y (� Raplece? Y �} Move lerpeC Y (� Olber.
Hfeat on ad�eceat trees none ❑evaluate
�nn� o o,� ❑� r��o�► o� � 1 � �
COMMENTS
.��� � /��
. �
' HALSTEAD'S ARBORICULTURE CONSULTANTS
� � TREE CHARACTERISTI(�`GUIDE
Tree Number:=,.'�gpacies: Botanical:
,
' DGL:�DBH:�,r,�Trunks:�He' ht:
�9 _��Dia Lmb Sprd: ��l
; Crown Class: Dominant: Co-Dominarrt: !l InGuded: �
Special:Specimen:______H�oric: Str�eet Tree: Indigenous:� .
., t Health Rating:�Strudure Ratirtg:�Root Structure Ratin :
� requi�s profesional care) 9 �{20°6-40%Haztree--5096-70°�
;�� Pruning History: Pro Car�e: Crown Reduced:_Ftush Cuts:,Topped:
, CIOM�M�7T IMicale pra9enoe of i�idual detee�s and�e tl�eir eeuer�(s=se�m=mod�aie.�_�
� �Y�� 7� ��i �
(aoduomi�fo� �
ae�d�d�es
in�t�md 6�t -
C�aoe�iiea� .
, N4ind�Fse�a
4�I�I�rra�l6pdet
�r
Loa�led h�rlt
aoldf��e6ire
Dea�oodl�
bo�wmllena�e.�'aals
i�iodsfiise
��
�Prt��eg►tufat f�isepolen�tk 1-bw;2-ma�mt3-lipl�4-9eV6i
�nerio� aAedd ma�aal aaar s�.af p�rt ,-�6-c15 ynr.2-s-,�-(�c,,,r
F�nie Pble�l+SeedPa[�Ta�et R�i�=1fi�fl�in� 3-16,�0"(�75ank4-�30'(75 an)
�_+�_+_�_� ��� 1-oaaiad�2 iolaa�nt us�
3-fcequent use;4-cfl�nt use
HAZARD A��IT
r'� �"�o�e d�s n�t a r�e�e ena weignc ❑crown c!� oUtin o r�se ar�, ❑c�orm roduce a�tr�ure 0 shepe
�'�� �d� ❑mot c�o�m ❑decay O ae�ial D mo
Remove tree: � N Replac ? Y� Move terpet Y I� Olbec
qfeat on ad�eceM trees one ❑evaluate
NotltkeUo� ❑owner O manaper Cq"�wmkip aper�r 0� �
COMMENTS
�
x� ,�� .�� �''� �,, .�✓i � .-Crn, .���
, . e ��/�, .�
� � ,,�r-�,�,y�% � � .� .�--ti1 k,��dC�
1 �
HALSTEAD'S ARBORICULTURE CONSULTANTS
' ; TREE CHARACTERlSTICS GUIDE
Tree Number:�-7'Spercies: Botanical:
DGL:�DBH:,�Trunks:_,,,�HeigM:�,_Dia Lmb Sprd:�
�
Crown Class: Dominant: Ca-Dominarrt:�ncluded:��_
Special:Specimen: Historic: Street Tree: Indigenous: -
_.:�� Health Rating:�:dsr�zructure Rating�Root Structu�e RBUng:�� (209�-4096 Haztree--5096-70°�
requires profesionai care)
:� Pruning History: Pro Cane: Crown Reduced:_Flush Cuts:_Topped:
Z71�MIN�7�IMic�pre�enoe a�i�dYid�wl dabds ad rale Uieir sara�Y(s=�m=moda�ab�,�=1ow�
�CT I�Wf� �� �S
_ Qbor
Ouda�ni�
alddw�s -
N�Ied bidc
6aoesai�ad �
111ima�fse�an
Oowi�l�to�dat -
� � �
La�ciea h�k
holel6xliYe .
Dea�oo�inSs
Rehio�si�iwe
����
Tns prt ma�t�t�fat fe1�e pols�iat 1-fo�2-a�ed�nC 3-diyl��4-aeNa
' M�P�1�� 6ia�d.�C.�aber Sf�e af ptt 1-�6'(15 aqx 2-6-18"(15-�5 anX
Faiite Phlaafol+S�dPatfTa�at R�1'i9=fl�sd R�in� 3-16�90"(�75aak4-a30'(75 an)
�+ ,� +�-� b'pd�ig 1-ooc�sioid a�2 ialQai�nt us�
3-irequent use;4-cot�stant use
HAZNiD ABATEMENT
�: o��� aa���a�c �� � o��► o�� o� o�
� ca�te,�e+�o� �f�: o roac� ❑aer�y o a� �mo
8emove tree: Y N Replace? Y Q Move tatpet Y � Olber.
Eieat on ad(eceM irees: iti7none D evaluate
N� O owner �maRaper @'goveminp aper�y DdK �
COMMENTS
' .� .��- �`� .��-�. .�
�'�� �
� �
� HALSTEAD'S ARBORICULTURE CONSULTANTS
9 . TREE CHARACTERISTICS GUIDE
� ,.
, Tree Number:,��pe+cies: . Botanical:
� �DBH: 1 Trunks: Height:,��,.,Dia Lmb Sprd:_�
- i DGL: �_ �_
Crown Class: Dominant: I� Co-Dominarit: Included:
" Special:Specimen: Historic: Str+eet Tree: Indigenous: -
� Heallh Rating:�Structure Rating: �� Root Struciure Rating��(2096-40°� Hariree--5096-70:6
. requines profesional care)
�� Pruning History:Pro Care: Crown Reduced:_Flush Cuts:_Topped:
.,
�'/lOII�N�7�ladr�le pasenx of i�idu�l�and�aMe�sa�s�11(s=sere�e.m=a�oder'afe.I=1ow)
�CT �WI� 11� �� �IB
Pbar
{ Oodami�if�is
alhdaoen� . -
lor�qded bad�
' 6aoessiretad �
�
Nbmll�fsa�+
�aaialf�irramsMd�et -
�r � �
Loose�b�rk
4oiel6�el�ire .
Deo�oodF�bs
P�i�ieie �
����
Tiee p�rt mo�t�tniat fiim�poilroli# 1-bw;2-a�mCB-uipt�4-seYei
' M�Pnio��a�aal bi�wd o� S�e af pitt i-�'(15 caax 2-6-18'(15-45 anx
faiRt Pialeai�i t S� Patf Ta�et R�=H0[d tt�l"w9 3-i6ti�"(�75 ank 4-�30r'(75 an)
�+�+�_� Ttryd�fi�1-oocaioao[a�2 iala�o�eM us�
� 3-it�uer�t uae;4-constent use
HAZARD ABATEMENT
�: ❑���c ��a�c o�� ��� a«�►� o� o�
; �
_'� � i�ea raMr: ❑mo�«ow� ❑aeca�, o ae� 0 mo
Remove tree: Y � Repiece? Y i�i More terge� Y � Otbe�
; Hleat on ad�eceM treea: none—�te
NoHfkauo� O owner D manaper C�giveminp�ncy Dd� -_� � C
COMMENTS
���
; HALSTEAD'S ARBORICULTURE GONSULTANTS
`� .. TREE C CTERISTICS GUIDE
Tree Number: _�Sp�cies: Botanicai: ��'19 � \
j —_____
: DGL:�DBH:�T+unks:_,_;t___Height:,��Dia Lmb Sprd:�
? Crown Class:Dominant:�Co-Domirrent: Included:
�
` Special:Specimen: Historic:���T��; Indigenous:� .
A�� Heaith Ratin �: p o o �
� g:�Structure Rati ,�Root Strudure R�t1ng:�(20�-40� Haztree--5096-70/o
� requires profesional care)
�� Pruning Hi�tory: Pro Care: Crown Reduced:_Flush Cuts:,Topped:
,
��1�1�presence of�ral detec�s and ra�e their sa�er�y(s=ae�e�m=n�a�1=brv)
��
, Pnos � � �� �
Ba�
�lodemioal�llo�s
_ �
Mduded 6�k .
�iaor,�ireend �
�
Oo��l6wdoet
�orr
l�asolba�fea b�rk -
hOld6sehi�e
�aa�aodi�s .
8atewll�riesf�nis
` Pre�iatsiaise �
��� -
ieePartmost�a�iy�ufa� �epnie�at 1-tow;2-�C3-d'gi�4-sew�
�1��_�,{�C_� ti� o�a S�eafptt 1-�(Sqar2-6-�"(15-45an};
f'a7me Pelenl'd+S'ae��at+Tmyat RaU9=Efaad�n9 3-'i&+,�0"`(fi"r75 an�4-a3pF-(75 poj
'� +�f�_ . r� Taget r�ig 1-oocasiorel�2�tt us�
� 3-f�equent use;4-cn�nt use
HA2ARD ABATEIYlENT
� P�m� 0�nove d�iwe p�t 4a're�ce�d weigfit �de� O� c�py O crorm�ed�e D re�ntt�ue ❑s�ape
' � � Inp�d i�Wer. ❑root a�xm ❑
�Y �a� D mo
Remove hee: Y � Replace7 Y� MoYe lerpe� Y (I� 01her.
Effect on ad(aceirt trees: [B'none �evatuate
NaBtidatlaa�: ❑owner O mar�ger �i�minp aD�Y Det� � ��
; COMMENTS
'��� � 7 �� �� ' ,
) .� �,��
�-
j HALSTEAD'S ARBORiCULTURE CONSULTANTS
� .. TREE C RACTERISTICS GUIDE
, Tree Number..� a � Speaes: . ota�icat: �
I
DGL:�pBH:�Trunks:�_Height:;��.Dia Lmb Sprd:�
? Crown Class: Dominant: Co-Dominarrt: �' induded:�
1 `V
Special:Specimen: Historic: S'treet Tree: indigenous: �
� Health Rating:�Stnadure Rating:�,Root Strudure Rating:�(20�0-44°�Haztree--50%-70°�
requires profesional care)
.j Pruning History: Pro Care: Crown Reduced:_Flush Cuts:_Topped:
,�
�
ClIOMIJi�7�ladir�e pa�enoe af i�iuual defec�s aAd ra�e their sew�riqr(s=sa+ie�e�m=mude�ale.!=bw}
i �.T �di� � 9�� �
Phor
,
; -
; a� _ -
�b�t
600e�ireead - �
wlou+d�Fso�r+
;aa
loasakradea h��k
holel6�e line .
�
; Pkarioes taie�e �
��
�ieepatmost9oelj/tufst Faise� 1-bw;2-�3-[i�4-se�
le�e�iaa Aeaio� a�r�l �taol,Cof6er S�e af pa�t 1-<G'(S aa�2-6a8"(S�5 t��
�ePro�iaxfnl+ afPaK+'�i�ig=�t�d�6n� �-��"(�5�X4-�'(TSpa)
�+�+�_� '�r�t-��;���
3-ireqt�tt t�se;4-consta�rt u�
H�RD��i�'
�: o��� ��a�,t c�c� � �� o�� o� o�
_ � c�blel�ao� �1� �roaa� C��t ��! �mo
Remove tree: Y Rapiace? Y� iiA�e iarge� Y 1�0 tif�er.
jE9�t at�ad(ac�t tree� nflne [�evattr�te
i�� ❑ownez D� ��ovemi�eg� � �
�Q���
3 -� ti� �� '�
� �
; �� �
,:�
��:��1�SD��: � a .
' DBH: #at ttunks:_� Heipdt�_$pcesd; ��DGL� �
; Form: .
gene�mmetric 0 minor asymmehy ❑ma�or asymmetry ❑stump sprou� ❑stag-headed
Crmm cfass: daminant ❑co-dominant ❑' rmediate ❑suppressed ��� ��
' 13ve crowrt ratia %
� A9e d� ' Young ❑semFinature Omatur� ❑over-mature/senescertt
Praning hisiory; ❑crawm deaned ❑excessive{y thinned �topped ❑ct�a�nm raised 0 pollarded ❑c�ovun tedueed ❑flush cuts ❑cabledlb�a
�m� ❑none 0 mu�iple prunirtg events Approx.dates:
� Special'Value: O specime� ❑heritage/historic ❑w�dl'ife O unusual ❑sh�eet tree ❑screen 0 shade ndigenous ❑protecfed by gov
�-� ��TM .
'``' Folfage calnr. �irtnal ❑cf�lorotk ❑neixotic Eplcamics? Y� G�owlh abadactlon�
Foliage de�ity: gnormal sparse Leaf size: ❑normal �small ❑stakes ❑wire/ties ❑signs 'O cables
:� Annnalshoot q P g
' 9�h: excellerit ❑ave�a e �� oo� 1Mii Die6aek? Y� ❑curb/paveme�rt O guards
� W�ndrroad at �e�ocellent �average ❑poor �ne ❑other �.
Vigar clas� �(excellent ❑average L7 fair 0 poor
, Ma�or pesla/diseaaex
., s�Cfl�
I S��� Nei hborin Pro e N S E W #Feet ^ -
9 9 P rtY . �opert space nah�ral 0 woodlandlforest
�hP� `, -
irtfgatb� �nan�.�p���� � Hill Side( ) Formai( ) Woodland/Forest Overhartg Road( )
----�. �.� .
TREE DEFECTS-
Aoorne��
, .
Suspaei rootmt 11�N IN��roo�W�t Y� tD: �
E�d iao1� ❑severe �mode�te t�r UaAermided: ❑severe [a moderate �low
(�+OfYIY� Uidca�p��e a#�defeds an�!rabe tl��n1Y(S=�e,m=modecate.i=lowj .
� 1100�Q� Tlp�( �CJiE#�.�5 �
, � .
C�
� . .
Inclnded Qark
Ex�ire end '
�
J
��
t ��
��
�lf,
BOICtS� � � _ �
' r
� � I
��—� �>> > t�t
, � ��
Troe�:��8peeies .
DBk:� �d�wY�� �� � DGL� � �L�� - ��
Fam: ❑ pene�ally t�mu�oc asym�y ❑ma)or asymmetry �slumP sprou� ❑stag-headed.ST1'GLCT- �j0
Crown Nas� doL�Y' minarrt D ca-dominant 0' iate ❑suppressed
, t.hie uew�ratla�96 11gs e!� �I�►ata�0 ���re O�'e �
,., P�oniu!hWory: L7 ctam cleaned ❑e�ac�ehlihf�ied Otioppcd ❑crown raised �p�arded ❑croMm r� O fiush ads ❑c�N6ra
' O none ❑muitlpls pnu�irrg e�nts APP�+� .
Spedat Value: ❑specimen �heri�ge/historic ❑wiidlife ❑unusuai ❑street tree ❑screen de �indigenous �protected by pav.
. ��TM �
r�e�: o� ❑�or� �r Y � s�.�.a� � ..
, r-elta�e�ih: a� �� t.�r s�x �norm� nau ❑st� ❑wird� ❑si�s ❑cables
llanaat sl�a�t po�k �e� ❑avera� [$�Poor Fii!�dfl, Y � ❑auW��t �9�
Woa�ood� O txcdle� �avmage �poar ❑tane ❑ahet _
Vigor dasx ❑ Q ave�e ' C1 tair �oor ,
� �
_ Mabr pestaldissa�ex �
. $� - --- �--
Slle I�rader: Neighboring Property N S E W �Fee� f]apen spaoe ❑rta�ra! ❑woa�
��� � Open Area O Hill Side O Formal O Woodland/Forest efiang Road( 1
Irt�r ❑na�er•, .
—,--
�EE DEFECTS- \� —
.
RQOT Dff�C1� `
Susped root.�C Y� psaet Y� ID:
E�oted eoolc ❑aeMere �moder�e 0 low Ud� �9euer�e ❑mode�abe O low _
CAOMIN�k�da�p�ese��d idNiduu�al ddects aod�rie�s�iY(s=sara�.m=mode���=In�
. DH�r I�Oi Ci� 11� � �
P�nor
eo�
Codomirodsf(ori�
� . -
Irdided bmk
Exoes�e e�d -
Wb�a
, �� _
Coo�laackCd balit
- holdbae!we '�
- - ' �
, �
� ) ..-� ,� � 1 �
�
>y '
1�
n�t��.s� � :� � : _��
�_� �rr.��—. � � -�— - E{L�C�1
� �q/� �n��► �m�1or�► �s�nP spras ��aa-he�ed
� .ST�u�'r-� ��
cm�m ds� �r�+.rtdr�nc 0 co-dommant 0� °�PP�
I.�rs osw� - 96 JI�dasc �ywq ��e 0 nnias O
P�j�s1Ory: 0 aam dea��ed ❑�►tl�ned 0 mPl�d ❑aa�n r�isad ❑paia�ded C3 croiwa c�doced 0 flush ads ��
� D none ❑na�iP�e pu�n9� �1°x� � .
� ❑wfldllEe ❑unus� ❑sh+eet tree ❑s�een ❑siiade igenous ❑pra�ad t�►9�
_ SpaefatYalaa ❑specimen Q h��
���
Fe�p e�: a rom�el 0 iieaalic E�ie�ir.rtt Y Awr ia�� _ � �
�sl�e l�p: D oarnat � t,wt si� O norm�l � �sfaioes ❑wi�d�s ❑sig� ❑r,�es
' A�i s�t!�� 0 eodoa/ent �� QP� �� Y� �� a� -
IN�a�wM ieri�wo�t �e�aoellent ❑areage �Poa' �nons D al�et
Vigar eia� ❑ez�iient �davet� �:Q tau' a poo�
Ma�Or Pe�taldiseasex
� N S E W �Fed � ❑ape�space 0�al ❑woo�� .
Sllt�aae� Neighboring ProP�Y . . . .:
�b!� `�.. �verhang Road(_---)
, Open Ar�a( ) HiIE Side( ) Formal( ) Wo�landlForest�
In�flo� ❑nOl1e'•. -
-�-- ��� -
���-
AO�DT� . ' .
Set�edn�t�sC Y� � Y� �
6�ai�oMc a seMece �moder�e 0 bw U�I�Yet 0�s 0 rtioder�e� ❑laar _ -
pli0��7�IodraiepiesexceatiaJ�i�raiAeieutaadwl���iJI(s=ssi_ise�m=moder�le.i=io�
�[ �O[� '� . � �
Pbor .
. HOR
COdooiil�fo�l�s -
�
�duded 6■d[
f�eeed -
M�1�
�� -
EA�bodt
bold6ee � '
�ire
Daadr�oo�
� / l � ��
�"t�:��
L� te�c�
,r��:;,��1 � � �� ,ll. - .
�
oe� �.._ �ot�_�:_ �a a�■t ��°q--�--� . f{L-�'� : 7�
�: o �„� �� ❑�� o�� ��sTruc"�' �l C�
lko�m das� ❑ daminent INco-datrirent O b�fi�te ❑suRpt�sed oc,V
l.i�e erow�a9ac � 96. ll�da�: O y�arq ��rt�r�ee 0 maims ❑
,,.� Prn�9�i�iorr L7 aawn deaned ❑�oo�iel�1 tliNied �toppal ❑aa�rrt raised �pofla�ded�a�own�edu�ed ❑1Msh ais CI�
; O none 0 nn�{Ople p�udnp e� Appcooc d� • -
! Spa�iat Yala� ❑specimen ❑� 0 wNd�fe �unu� ❑sir�tree screen ❑shade ❑iadigeno� ❑pra�ad 1�19�►
,.�� ���� �
� Fe14y�eol�: ❑dtlwo�Ic I]�eaolic F�ia��n/�ia't Y� A�■�i�R4wc . � ..
, Fapa�s�; nartni sp�se l.�f six� L�nanal O srtmd D sfalms 0 wi� (�s[�s O r,abbs
' Aane�s�l�� L�le�aoe� ❑a�aape Qpoor 7M!Di�lwdd Y 1� 0�hl�n�� 0 9ara'ds
,�,�a+�.l.e� ❑� �� anoo� nno� o�er �
� Vlgsr dasx ❑eoac�llent Q"aave�a9e � �fair D poor
�im Pesta/disessex
� - __.._ -
N S E W �Feet ❑�� o� a�
SMe Cha�adec Neighb�in9 ProP�l► - .
. �� `�`.' ppen Area( ) Hill Side( ) Formal( ) WaodiandlFo�t( 9 Road l �
�rc L7 none'•. .
' T��/�� \
�YY iW Y' \ -_
�� �
�ro�t� Y�� �aat Y� I�t .
Eapo�M ioMc Q�oMera �moder�e ❑iow IMini■et 0 ss�a D rt�odaa0e � ❑bw _
Q�f1�1��p�e9enc�di�iintd�derlsaodu�eieirsaai��s=ser■R,�a=leode�ale.�=Iu�1
�i ro[� 7�� �d� �1B
Pboc .
ec�
� . -
' lnduded 6a�k
.E�es�ead - -
1Alomd�si
�� -
ioasdtraaloeu mdt
�� A -
.'
� •�
� � � D
� ' �
)
{
3
j �
.�� ��• ' � � +�
; u�_� �d��_ _�_� - t-(L�{� • �Z�
. Fmn� ❑ �r sm�tric �m�ra�ronetr�r ��v ❑s�ana�ra� ❑shag-h�d
C:m m d a s� � d o m i n a n t 0 c o-d a�n t ❑fi�a d i N.� 'ST�u.C�. ��
� I.irs oew�a�oc�_96 A�d�, [ o�iq ❑�e 0�aies �
,;,,.,., ��9�7 0 ccam cleaned O eoao�ely lhimed ❑�oppcd ❑aown rassd C!pafa�ded C1 aiawn te�iuced �ftush a�s�c�htedlbca
, � O�ar�e C)a�itlpa�cu�ng ereif� Apprmc.date�
' s�aarv�u� as�en o n��c owaa�e ❑u�a� ❑s�c� m�, t�� �a� o�a�r oo�►.
� Tt{�lEAL1N �
FeN�.e�ec �� �neaaic Ep�n.iea? Y y(� s�.MrMa�..c . _.
, Fdhya� O nart�al '�e L�af sh� O nand �� ❑alakes 0 wi�eNas ❑sig� ❑c�les
Nm�at s�OOt ps�, ❑e�ocefe�d t7a�afR �r 7bi!Oi�h�df1 Y 1� �arhl�e��t 09a�d�
Ml�a�w0 rani�a�t O aaa�ent �aueiape �poor � ❑a� �
v���a� ❑�u� o� ' a� � �
' �im Pe�ia/diseasex
��-4 �
Slle� Neighborir�g ProPertY N S E W #Feet ❑apan space 0 aahral ❑Woo�andlEa�sE -
' � �� ,•.� OPen Ar�( ) HiH Side( ) Formal( ) WoodlarMlFores�( : .pverhang Road{ )
- II1�IOoIC ❑nWIB�.� .
T
���'_ `\\
�����i
� f�W!ll��r/�1L ' � � �
� �
Sas}ee!�let Y N pnswk Y N I�t .
E�i� Q saMera �mode�e O Iow Il�ai�et D sere�e ❑moda�e � 0 IoAr .
1�1� �pasmoedid�i�wid�ieclsaodwle�sa�i�(s=�s4te=dods�lia.l=bw1
�Si 1�0[CIA � . �� �
Pbar
. eo� .
�bdae�imalslfcsls
aldd�e�lt . -
uri�ded haslt
E�ead
M4od�fineae�
:-aw -
t.oa�doma b�dc
�aidt�ee bire ';
D�d�oodls�us -�
, c t
�
� � ' `�
r '
�,.
1 I/12/2004
��� Conditions Associated With 1':58:51 PM
T I D E M A R K Case #: MLP2004-00004
COMPUTER SVSTEMS, INC.
Co dition Status Updat
C� Title Hold Shatus Changed By Tag Datc By
, 10. The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to the City's global
positioning system(GPS)geodetic control network(GC 22). These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of
the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates,the plat shall contain the
scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These
coordinates can be established by:
-GPS[ie networked to the City's GPS survey.
-By random traverse using conventional surveying methods.
1 F-PLAT SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS None NOT MET KSM 8/]6/2004 PLL
1 l. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements:
A. Submit for City review four(4)paper copies of the final plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to practice in
Oregon, and necessary data or narrative.
B. Attach a check in the amount of the current final plat review fee(Contact Planning/Engineering Permit Technicians,
at(503)639-4171,ext.2421).
C. The final plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes
(ORS 92.05), Washington County,and by the City of Tigard.
D. The right-of-way dedication for Fonner shall be made on the final plat.
E. NOTE: Washington Counry will not begin their review of the final plat until they receive notice from the
Engineering Department indicating that the City has reviewed the final plat and submitted comments to the applicant's
surveyor.
F. After the City and County have reviewed the final plat, submit three mylar copies of the final plat for City Engineer
signature(for partitions), or City En��ineer and Community Development Director signatures(for subdivisions).
1 PROVIDE A STREET TREE PLAN None Met I I/12/2004 MAS 1 1/12/2004 MAS
12. Provide a plan showing the type of street tree to be planted and their spacing.
1 TREE PROTECTION PLAN FINAL REPORT None NOT MET MAS 8/16/2004 PLL
13. Prior to issuance of building permits the Project Arborist shall submit to the City Forester a final report describing
how the Tree Protection Plan was implemented and detailing any failures to comply with the Tree Protection Plan. The
report shall also describe the health of all remaining trees on the site,with details provided as to any tree that has had its
root system disturbed or that has otherwise been damaged.
1 PROVIDE F-PLAT PHOTOMYLAR COPY None NOT MET KSM 8/16/2004 PLL
14. Prior to issuance of building permits,the applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with a"photomylar"
copy of the recorded final plat.
1 UNDERGROUND UTILITIES OR PAY FEE None NOT MET KSM 8/l6/2004 PLL
15. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Fonner Street underground as a part of
this project,or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site
that is parallel to the utility lines and will be$35.00 per lineal foot. [f the fee option is chosen,the amount will be
$6,685.00 and it shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits.
1 PAY H20 QUALITY/QUANTITY FEES None NOT MET KSM 8/16/2004 PLL
16. During issuance of the building permit for Parcels 2&3,the applicant shall pay the standard water quality and
water quantity fees per lot(fee amounts will be the latest approved by CWS).
4
P2ge 2 Of 2 CaseConditions..rpt
. .
'"°�''� `°""ri,°�°°°" 2004-131771
11 N 6. 04:00:06 PM
Datlb Cnt■1 Btn�6 J GREGORY
i20.00 S8.00 S11.00•Total=537.00
After recording, return to:
City of Tigard — Records Division
13125 SW Hall Blvd. oossasazzooao�si��iooaooas
TI ard OR 97223 I,J�rryH�n�on,DlnetorofM��um�M�ndTaYatlon ���
9 + �nd Ex-0Rlclo Counly Cl�rk PorNhthlnpton County,
Onpon,do h�nby e�rtly th�t th�wtthln InsWmmt of,°`� ,���
wNtlnp wu neNwd�nd neard�d In th�book of �`�":� , , _,,
Y r�cords oi�dd couMy. ��y� ��!'. `
J�rry R.Hamon,Dlr�etor�immt�nd Taxatlon,�'=,��J
�co P E.���o�o��ty�,.*
RESTRICTIVE COVENANT
(FUTURE STREET IMPROVEMENTS)
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this �� day of Sr�, 20_�, by the City of Tigard, a
nicipal Corporati n of Washington County, Oregon, ("CITY"), and
.uN.�-f C. ��.r� , �"OWNER").
RECITALS
WHEREAS OWNER is the Owner of record of Property covered by this Agreement as shown in Section
1 below, and
WHEREAS OWNER has received approval of a development on the Property from the CITY, as set forth
in MLP2004-00004 dated 8/4/04, and
WHEREAS Chapter 18.810 of the TMC (Tigard Municipal Code) contains certain conditions applicable to
street improvements, and issuance of permits is conditioned on OWNER'S compliance with the TMC,
and
WHEREAS OWNER wishes to mitigate the impacts of the proposed development, and
WHEREAS parties wish to fulfill the requirements of Chapter 18.810.
IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual promises, covenants and undertakings, and the issuance of a
building permit in advance of OWNER constructing improvements required by the TMC, the parties agree
as follows:
Section 1: The real property subject to this Agreement is described as follows:
daa y -Q�3 � ooy �3� 7� y
Parce/s 1, 2 8 3 of Partition Plat No. , recorded as Document No. , Washington Counfy,
Oregon.
OWNER agrees that the terms of this Agreement shall bind the OWNER as well as its
heirs, successors in interest or assigns.
Section 2: The improvements covered by this Agreement are as follows:
Fonner Street
Restrictive Covenant(Future Street Improvements) Page 1 of 4
Revisbn aate: 1/1/01
� � IIIIII!!IIII�'�-'''llllll III
2004-131771
Half-street improvements in accordance with City of Tigard standards. These
improvements include, but are not limited to, curb, sidewalk, planter strip, street trees, paving and storm
sewer.
Section 3: This Agreement shall be in full force and effect from the date of its execution until the
improvements referred to in Section 2 are constructed in accordance with CITY standards
in effect at the time of construction.
Section 4: CITY agrees that the improvements listed in Section 2 will only be required as a result of
any one of the following events:
(1) when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for by the
formation of a Local Improvement District,
(2) when the improvements are part of a larger public project to be financed or paid for
in whole or in part by CITY or other public agency,
(3) when the improvements are part of a larger project to be constructed by a third
party and involves the sharing of design and/or construction expenses by the third
party owner(s) of property in addition to the property described in Section 1, or
(4) when construction of the improvements are deemed to be appropriate by the City
Engineer in conjunction with construction of improvements by others adjacent to
the improvements described in Section 2.
In addition to this Agreement, OWNER'S obligation to share design and/or construction
expenses may arise by application of the Reimbursement District Ordinance; Chapter
13.09, TMC, or any similar ordinance or law providing a process whereby such expenses
are distributed among benefited properties.
Section 5: OWNER agrees to sign any and all waivers, petitions, consents and all other documents
necessary to obtain the above listed applicable improvements under any improvement act
or proceeding of the State of Oregon, Washington County, or the CITY as may be
proposed or adopted and to waive all right to remonstrate against the improvements listed
in Section 2 above, submitted either alone or in conjunction with other improvements
described in Section 4, as may be proposed. OWNER agrees that in lieu of any other
document, CITY may treat this Agreement as a waiver of remonstrance on behalf of the
property described in Section 1 against formation of such a Local Improvement District.
OWNER covenants and agrees that the improvements described in Section 2 will specially
benefit OWNER'S property as described in Section 1.
Section 6: If CITY decides to form a Local Improvement District as a mechanism for the installation of
improvements listed in Section 2, then OWNER shall retain the right to protest only the
amount or the manner of spreading the assessment, but not the formation of such district.
Section 7: CITY acknowledges that OWNER'S execution and performance of the terms of this
Agreement constitutes compliance with the requirements of TMC Chapter 18.810.
Section 8: OWNER agrees that if CITY causes the improvements listed in Section 2 to be
constructed, or part of such improvements without regard to the source of funds for such
project, but not as part of a Local Improvement District, then CITY will charge to OWNER
and OWNER will promptly pay OWNER'S share of the cost of such improvements.
OWNER'S share will be determined by CITY in a manner similar to spreading the cost of a
public improvement to specially benefited properties. The parties intend OWNER to share
Restrictive Covenant(Future Street Improvements) Page 2 of 4
Revision date: 1f1J01
r IIIII�II IIIIII I'lllllllll III
2��4-131771
in the cost of improvements even though actual construction is undertaken and performed
by some third party, so long as the improvements, listed in Section 2, are included within
the project.
(1) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (2) of this section, prior to construction
of such improvements under this section, OWNER shall be provided not less than
six (6) months written notice by first class mail that the project will be built. The
notice shall advise OWNER that OWNER will share in the cost of such
improvements and provide OWNER with an estimate of the total project cost as
well as an estimate of OWNER'S share of the costs. Failure to provide this "six
month" notice in advance of construction shall not nullify OWNER'S obligation to
pay, but shall only extend the payment due date by the amount of time less than
six months that notice was given, but not more than six months. Upon completion
of improvements pursuant to this Section, CITY shall provide written notice to
OWNER of OWNER'S share of the actual cost of the improvements and OWNER
shall pay OWNER'S share within sixty (60) days. If OWNER's share of the cost of
the improvements is $10,000 or more, the owner may elect to pay the City in 10
equal annual installments, with the first installment due within 60 days of the
notice. The installment option shall be available only if the OWNER provides
written notice and the first payment within 60 days of the notice. If the installment
option is chosen, the unpaid amounts shall bear interest at the then legal rate of
interest. Interest on overdue payments shall bear interest at the rate of one and
one-half (1 'h%) per month from the date the payment is due until paid.
(2) Where the improvements listed in Section 2 are constructed by a third party, who
seeks reimbursement in accordance with the Reimbursement District Ordinance,
Chapter 13.09, TMC, or a similar ordinance, then the terms and procedures of the
ordinances shall apply in lieu of the provisions in subsection (1) of this section.
Section 9: At any time prior to the events listed in Section 4, OWNER or OWNER's successors may
pay to the CITY an amount determined by the CITY to be OWNER's share of the
anticipated cost of the future improvements. Payment under this section shall discharge
all of OWNER's obligations under this Agreement. City shall use the funds received under
this section solely to pay for the costs of the improvements.
Section 10: CITY and OWNER intend that all terms of this Agreement shall be covenants, conditions,
and restrictions running with the title to the property covered by this Agreement, and shall
be binding upon parties to this Agreement, their heirs, executors, assigns, administrators,
and successors and shall be construed to be a benefit and a burden upon the property
described in Section 1. The parties agree the CITY may, for purposes of recovering the
cost of improvements described in Section 2, levy an assessment against the property,
described in Section 1, and may enforce payment of such assessment in the manner
provided in ORS Chapter 223 or the general laws of the State of Oregon.
Section 11: Promptly after its execution by the parties, this Agreement shall be recorded in the records
of Washington County to provide public notice and especially notice to future owners of
property, described in Section 1 of the conditions, covenants and restrictions against the
title to the property imposed by this Agreement.
Section 12: CITY may enforce the terms of this Agreement in any court of competent jurisdiction. In
addition to any other legal remedies, OWNER'S failure or refusal to comply with this
Restrictive Covenant(Future Street Improvements) Page 3 of 4
Revisbn date: tn/01
r4 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
2004-131771
Agreement shall constitute a violation of the TMC and the rights, remedies, and penalties
provided in the TMC may also be enforced.
Section 13: If suit or action is instituted to enforce a right guaranteed in this agreement, the prevailing
party shall be entitled to, in addition to the statutory costs and disbursements, a
reasonable attorney's fee to be fixed by the trial and appellate courts respectively.
Section 14: The parties agree that if any term of provision of this agreement is declared by a court to
be illegal or in conflict with any law, the validity of the remaining terms and provisions shall
not be affected, so long as this agreement continues to reflect the intent of the parties. The
parties shall negotiate an equitable adjustment of this agreement so that the purposes of
this agreement are effected.
OWNER(S):
°'P'
� nature Sig a ure
�,�,�,�� (s�i4-'T`__
Name (Print or Type) Name (Print or Type)
��k��
Title (Print or Type) Title (Print or Type)
Acknowledgment of OWNER'S signature(s) must be notarized. Where the OWNER is a corporation, it
has caused its name to be signed by resolution or official approval of its board of directors.
STATE OF OREGON )
County of l'����5 )
On this � day �� , 20 0� , before me a Notary Public,
eauc.� �rer�.i-z personally appeared an acknowledged that
the foregoing instrument to be their voluntary act and deed.
� Before me: 4.k��1, �
�� Notary Public for Oregon
OFFIC�.
�':�-.� CLAUDIk '�9
'I' ��� NOTARY PUBLi � GON
�� ���� COMMISSION N� �';26 My commission expires: � o
�r, '�^�CG?��'M!S510N EXPIRES Jf, 2008
�---�-,'..":.-
Accepted on behalf of the City of Tigard this I Z=� day of No��w��oe.� , 200' .
Q �. ��..,.�
City Engineer
Restrictive Covenant(Future Street Improvements) Page 4 of 4
Revislon tlate: 1!1/01
Dec-02-04 13:40 Gertz Offices 5a? 592 5433 P. Ol
HALSTE�iv'S �
A R B�R I C U LT U R E �SF���a��sts�� the�are and
preservation of trees"
CONSULTANTS, 1NC.
��` Dav�d Halsteaa.Corsultant. �.5.
Phillip bVhr,comb. Consullant �p , � `u � � �{����y���
� P.O 3cx 1182•Tuaiatin. OR 9;062 / /
K� i5�?j �45-?�83 � ��/G C,v (�-�'t Z—
• Fp,vi � -
�Z� � �`�,,;.��t ldR-�:� �e� t
November 29, 2004
` .. Gertz Constnaction
i ATTN.: Mr. Ken Gertz
19200 SW 46'h Avenue
�, Tualatin OR 97062
I
� Reference: S+te Review
Location: 11480 SW Fonner Street, Tigard, Oregon
Subject: Site Inspection
,,�* Ref: "Conditions Associated With Case#:MLP2004-00004", Paragraph, "Tree
� � -' Protection Plan Final Repart°
.��—" �!`' I have inspected the site and found alf of#he "T�ee Protection Fencing"
accurately placed in order to maximize the survival of the trees to be preserved.
� ;o,.� The trees that were removed have not damaged the trees that will be preserved
• � � '� and those trees that were pruned were completed in a professional manner.
: �
The fencing, pruning and remova{s have been compieted in accordance to anct
,, � as directed by the Tree Care and Preservation Report by Halstead's
�� Arboriculture, Consultants, Inc. dated March 22, 2004.
� The health of the preservable trees over all is rated at 80 percent, 100 percent
� being perfect.
� �
�� Sincerely,
I T�c� �
� ; �
� �iJ('�I C'�.�-i�f
� David Fialstead BS CA
� �
�
� ;
i rl
i �
il
�`
'� t
, ?�
�
t
� )
:,na�l r�ac`??��intone_:;um
,���vw.�-�alstead�arboncuttur�.•.:��n
�::�n r.r,r,�as
�
1 1/10/2004
�� �� Conditions Associated With 2:20:40PM
T I G E� A R K Case #: MLP2004-00004
COMPl1TEfi $VSIEMS. INC
Condition Status Updated
C� Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Date By
1 REVISE TREF'MITIGAI�ION PI.AN None NOT MET MAS 8 16 ?00-1 PLL
l. Revise the treeimiti�ation plan to address removal and mitigation of the two trees marked on the plan as "remove
trees at builder's discretion."
1 FINAL TREE PROTECTION PLAN None NOT MET MAS 8/16/2004 PLL
' 2. Prior to any site work,the applicant shall submit a final Tree Protection Plan that follows the recommendations of the
City Forester,as outlined under the discussion of Chapter 18J90.Tree Removal, in this decision.
1 RECORD TREE DEED RESTRICTIONS None Met 11/10/2004 MAS 11/10/2004 MAS
3. Record deed restrictions for those trees that are to be retained on the project site following completion of the partition
improvements.
1 OBTAIN PFI PERMIT None Met 11/9/2004 MW 11/9/2004 PLN
4. A Public Facility Improvement(PFI)permit is required for this project to cover sewer taps,storm drainage
improvements and any other work in the public right-of-way. Six(6)sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be
submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE:these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the
Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement(PFI)
permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards,which are available at City Hall and
the City's web page(www.ci.tigard.or.us).
1 PFI PERMIT FINANCIAL ASSURANCE None Met 11/9/2004 MW 11/9/2004 PLN
5. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name,address and telephone number of the individual or
corporate entiry who will be designated as the"Permittee",and who will provide the financial assurance for the public
improvements. For example,specify if the entiry is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC,etc. Also specify the state
within which the entiry is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate
information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents.
1 PAY THE ADDRESSING FEE None Met 11/9/2004 SJR 1 1/9/2004 PLN
6. Prior to final plat approval,the applicant shall pay the addressing fee. (STAFF CONTACT: Shirley Treat,
Engineering).
1 FONNER ST ROW DEDICATION None Met 10/19/2004 KSM 10/19/2004 ST
7. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of Fonner Street to increase the
right-of-way to 27 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline and
shown on the plat.
1 FONNER ST RESTRICTIVE COVENANT None Met 11/9/2004 MW 11/9/2004 PLN
8. The applicant shall execute a Restrictive Covenant whereby they agree to complete or participate in the future
improvements of SW Fonner Street adjacent to the subject property,when any of the following events occur:
A. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for by the formation of a Local
Improvement District,
B. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for in whole or in part by the City or other
public agency,
C. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be constructed by a third party and involves the sharing of
design and/or construction expenses by the third party owner(s)of property in addition to the subject property,or
D. when construction of the improvements is deemed to be appropriate by the City Engineer in conjunction with
construction of improvements by others adjacent to the subject site.
1 PROVIDE PUBLIC S/S CONNECTIONS None Met 11/9/2004 MW 11/9/2004 PLN
9. The applicant shall provide connection of proposed buildings to the public sanitary sewerage system. A connection
permit is required to connect to the existing public sanitary sewer system.
1 GPS COORDINATES None Met 8/5/2004 KSM 9/8/2004 ST
Page 1 of 2 CaseConditions..rpt
From:Ken Gertz To:Matt Scheidegger Date 11/10/20�4 Time 2:05'06 PM Page 2 of 2
_ � � � � .
After recurdm7;retum to: '
Kennetti Gerv �
192U0 SW 46'"
Tualatin,OR 97062-8770
Tree Protection Covenant
For Gertz Partition
AS RECORDED IN BOOK ,PAGE ,PLAT RECORDS
FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY
WHER�AS, Kenneth E. Gertz,has preserved or retained trees over and across portions of
Lots 1, 2 and 3 of Gertz Partition on Fonner in accordance with the Conditions of Approval. Any
such preserved or retrained tree may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a
certified arborist. Trees may also be removed for any reason the City of Tigard deems necessary or
appropriate. This deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if all trees
preserved in accordance with this section should either die or be removed as hazardous.
Invalidation of any provisions of this Tree Protection Covenant by judgment or court order shall in
no way effect any ofthe other provisions ofthis Covenant, which shall remain in full force and
effect.
THIS AGREEMENT shall be deemed a Covenant running with the land and is binding
upon the owners of Lots 1, 2 and 3 of Gertz Partition on Fonner,their heirs, successors, and assigns.
IN V4'ITNESS WHEREOF,the owner or owners ofall ofthe above described lots signed
this Agreement on the date and year set forth below.
KENNETH E. GERTZ
�1'� DATE:
Kenneth E. Gertz
Owner
STATE OF OREGON )
)ss
COUNTY�F WASHINGTON )
PERSONALLY APPEARED THE ABOVE NAMED KENNETH E. GERTZ AS OWNER,ACKNOWLEDGED
THE FOREGOING INSTRUIv�NT TO BE ITS VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED.
NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF OREGON
MY COMIvIISSION EXPIlZES