The URL can be used to link to this page

SLR2003-00009 I 20 DAYS = N/A CITY Of TIGARD DATE OF FILING: 10/16/2003 �'ommunity�DeveCopment ShapingA Better Community CITY OF TIGARD �Nashington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL �RDER BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER Case Numbers: SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW SLR 2003-00009 Case Name: HALL BOULEVARD CULVERT EXTENSION Name of Owner: Cit of Ti ard Attn: Vannie N u en Name of Applicant: Same as Owner Address of Applicant: 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Ti ard Ore on 97223 Address of Property: 13360 SW Hall Bouleverd Ti ard Ore on 97223 Tax Ma /Lot Nos.: Washin ton Co. Tax Assessor's Ma No. 2S102DA, Tax Lot 600. A FINAL 4RDER INfORPORATiNG TNE FAfTS, FINDINGS AND CONLLUSIONS APPROVING A REQUEST FOR SENSITIVE IANDS REYIEW. THE CITY OF TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER HAS REYIEWED THE APPLICANT'S PLANS, NARRATIVE, MATERIALS, COMMENTS OF REYIEWING AGENfIES, THE PLANNING DIVISION'S STAFF REPORT AND REfOMMENDATIONS F4R TNE APPLICATION DESCRIBED IN FURTHER DETAIL IN THE STAFF REP4RT. THE HEARINGS 4FFICER HELD A PUBII� HEARING ON OCTOBER I5. 2003 TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY REGARDING THIS APPII(ATION. THIS DEfISION HAS BEEN BASED ON THE FACfS, FINDINGS AND (ON(LUSIONS CONTAINED WITHIN THIS FINAI ORDER. Request: ➢ The City of Tigard requested Sensitive Lands Review approval to extend a stormwater outfall into the floodway along Fanno Creek. The outfall would serve to convey treated stormwater from the water quality facility to the waterway. At the close of the record, the Hearings Officer conditionally approved the application subject to the conditions of approval in the Staff Report, except recommended Condition of Approval No. 1 because the applicant submitted proof that the Oregon Division of State Lands (ODSL) had approved the application for the project. Zone: R-12: Medium-Density Residential District. Applicable Review Criteria: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.510, 18.775 and 18.790. Action: ➢ ❑ Approval as Requested � Approval with Conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper and mailed to: 0 Owners of Record Within the Required Distance � Affected Government Agencies � Area Citizen Involvement Team � The Applicants and Owners The adopted findings of fact and decision can be obtained from the Planning Division/Communiry Development Department at the City of Tigard City Hall. Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON OCTOBER 16, 2003 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON OCTOBER 31, 2003 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: - The decision of the Review Authority is �nal for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON OCTOBER 30, 2003. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON Regarding an application by the City of Tigard ) F I N A L O R D E R for Sensitive Lands Review for a stormwater ) outfall in the floodway along Fanno Creek at ) SLR 2003-00009 13360 SW Hall Boulevard in the City of Tigard ) (Hall Boulevard Culvert) A. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 1. This final order concerns an application by the City of Tigard(the "applicant") for Sensitive Lands Review for a stormwater outfall in the floodway along Fanno Creek at 13360 SW Hall Boulevard; also known as tax lot 600, WCTM 2S 102DA (the "site"). T'he outfall will dischazge treated stormwater into the creek from a water quality facility neaz SW Hall Boulevard. The applicant is widening Hall Boulevard in the vicinity of the site. The applicant will construct a stormwater facility to collect,treat and discharge stormwater runoff from the street into Fanno Creek. The outfall for the stormwater facility will be in the 100-year flood plain; therefore a Sensitive Lands Review is required. 2. Tigard Hearings Officer Larry Epstein (the "hearings officer") held a duly noticed public hearing on October 15, 2003 to receive and consider public testimony in this matter. At the beginning of the hearing, the hearings officer made the declaration required by ORS 197.763. The hearings officer disclaimed any ex parte contacts,bias or conflicts of interest. City planning manager Dick Bewersdorff recommended approval, subject to conditions. See the Staff Report dated October 2, 2003 (the Staff Report). He recommended the hearings officer delete condition of approval 1,because the applicant submitted proof that ODSL had approved the application for the project. On behalf of the applicant, Vannie Nguyen and Marlin DeHaas accepted the staff recommendations and conditions and waived the applicant's right to have the record held open for final argument. Other than relevant service providers and public agency staff,no one testified orally or in writing. The hearings officer closed the record at the conclusion of the hearing. 3. The hearings officer agrees with the findings,conclusions and conditions in the Staff Report,except condition of approval 1, and he adopts them as his own. Condition of approval should be deleted, because it is moot. 4. The hearings officer concludes that this Sensitive Lands Review application dces or can comply with the relevant standards and criteria of the Tigazd CDC as provided in this Final Order, provided the application is subject to conditions of approval that ensure finals plans and certain other information are provided and found suf�cient by the City in a timely manner and that subsequent development will comply with applicable CDC standards and criteria. Therefore the application should be approved subject to such conditions. B. DECISION Based on the findings and conclusions herein,the hearings officer hereby approves SLR 2003-00009, subject to the conditions of approval in the Staff Report,except recommended condition of approval no. 1 is hereby deleted,. A this 16th of Oct ber, 2003. arry Epste AIC City of T' ar He ngs Of�cer Agenda Item: 2.2 Hearing Date: October 15 2003 Time: 7:00 PM STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER CITYOFTIGARD Community I�eveCapment FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Shnp1T7�A�etter�ommun=ty 120 DAYS = 12/31/2003 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: HALL BLVD. CULVERT EXTENSION CASE NO: Sensitive Lands Review (SLR) SLR2003-00009 OWNER/ City of Tigard APPLICANT: Attn: Vannie Nguyen 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested approval to extend a stormwater outfall into the floodway along Fanno Creek. The outFall would serve to convey treated stormwater from the water quality facility to the waterway. The water quality facility receives the excess runoff created from the Hall Blvd. Half street improvement. LOCATION: 13360 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 2S102DA, Tax Lot 600. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN and ZONING DESIGNATION: R-12; Medium Density Residential: The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.390, 18.510, 18.775, and 18.790 SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Hearings Officer find that the proposed Site Development Review, Sensitive Lands, and Water Resources Overlay Review will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City and meets the Approval Standards. Therefo�e, Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to the following recommended Conditions of Approval: CITY OF TIGARD/HALL BLVD.OUTFALL PROJECT PAGE 1 OF 8 10/15l2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING C4NDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMITS: u mit to t e anning epartment ra i y, 7 , ext. 3 or review an approval: 1. Prior to site work, the applicant shall provide evidence in writing from the Oregon DSL that the proposed work is approved. 2. The applicant shall comp Iy with all conditions of approval that are required by the decision issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers dated July 22, 2003. 3. The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval from the Clean Water Services (CWS) service provider letter file #3181 during all phases of construction. FAILURE TO SATISFY THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITHIN 18 MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION SHALL RENDER THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION VOID. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site HistOry: T e ite is currently occupied by an existing single-family residence and an out building. The two buildings were constructed within the floodway and floodplain when they were originally built. As a result of a recent fire, it is anticipated that the City will demolish and remove the existing buildings on the site. The proposal is for a stormwater outfall that serves to convey water from the water quality facility and discharge it into Fanno Creek. Vicinit Information: e site is zone R-12 and surrounded by a mixture of multi-family, single-family, and industrial development. The site is also adjacent to Fanno Creek and Hall Blvd. A portion of the site is being developed by the City for a new library. The City is also involved in a separate study to construct Wall Street, a street connection befinreen SW Hall Blvd. and SW Hunziker that would be aligned along the southern portion of this site. Site Information and Pro osal Descri tion: e site is current y eve ope wit a single-family home and an out building. The site � slopes east to west and is within both the floodplain and the floodway. As a condition of approval for the libra�project, the City was required to construct a half-street improvement along SW Hall Blvd. his proposed outfall would convey stormwater that has been treated from the additional impervious surface of that improvement into Fanno Creek. SECTION IV. DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES, PERMITS AND USE Use Classification: Section 18.130.020 is s e se a egories. The applicant is proposin� to construct a stormwater outfall into the Fanno Creek and it's associated floodway. Basic Utilities are permitted conditionally in,this zone with the exception of water, storm, and sanitary sewers, which are outright permitted within the R-12 zoning district. Summa Land Use Permits: Chapter 18.310 e mes t e ecision-ma ing type to which the land-use application is assigned. CITY OF TIGARDMALL BLVD.OUTFALL PROJECT PAGE 2 OF 8 10/15/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER The proposed proJ ect would typically not be subJ'ect to review as it is an outrig ht permitted use in the R-12 zone; however, because a.portion of the pro�'ect impacts the floodway, this request is subject to review before the City of Tigard Hearings Officer as a Type III-HO review. SECTION V. SUMMARY �F APPLICABLE CRITERIA A summar� of the applicable criteria in this case in the Chapter order in which they are addressed in this report are as follows: A. A licable Develo ment Code Standards ecision- a in� roce ures 18.510 Residential Zoning Districts) 18.775 Sensitive Lands Review) 18.790 Tree Removal) SECTION VI. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS A. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. According to Table 18.510.1, basic utilities excluding water, storm, and sanitary sewers are subject to conditional use approval. The proposal is to extend a stormwater outfall into the Fanno Creek Floodway. There are no structures associated with the proposal, and no new lots are being created as a result of the proposal. Therefore, there are no applicable development standards (i.e. setbacks, lot width, etc.) for this proposal. FINDING: Based on the information provided in the narrative and on the site plan, the development standards of the R-12 zone are not applicable to this proposal. Sensitive Lands (18.775) T e earings icer s all have the authority to issue a sensitive lands permit in the 100-year floodplain by means of a Type fllA procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.050, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.775.OT0 B-E The proposal involves placing a storm outfall within the vegetated corridor and 100-year floodway of Fanno Creek. This proposal is considered by the Tigard Hearings Officer. 18.775.040 General Provisions for Floodplain Areas. Permit review. The appropriate approval authority shall review all permit applications to determine whether proposed building sites will be safe from flooding. Special flood hazard. The areas of special flood hazard identified by the Federal Insurance Administration in a scientiFc and engineering report entitled "The Flood Insurance Study of the City of Tigard," dated September 1, 1981, with accompanying Flood Insurance 11Aaps (updated February 1984 is hereby adopted by reference and declared to be a part of this chapter. This F�ood Insurance Study is on file at the Tigard Civic Center. The applicant and staff have reviewed these maps and a�ree that this site is within one of the identified special flood hazard areas. The application is being reviewed under this premise. CITY OF TIGARDMALL BLVD.OUTFALL PROJECT PAGE 3 OF 8 10/15/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Base flood elevation data. When base flood elevation data has not been provided in accordance with Subsection B above, the Director shall obtain, review and reasonably utilize any base flood elevation and floodway data available from a federal, state or other source, in order to administer Subsections M and N below. According to the City Floodplain Maps, the base flood elevation has been identified at 143.8 to 143.9. This criterion is met Test of reasonableness. Where elevation data is not available either through the Flood Insurance Studx or from another authoritative source, a�plications for building permits shall be reviewed to assure that proposed construction will be reasonably safe from flooding. The test of reasonableness is a local judgment and includes use of historical data, high water marks, photographs of past flooding: etc., where available. Failure to elevate at least two feet above grade in these sensitive land areas may result in higher insurance rates. As discussed previously, the elevation data is available on the maps that are available within Tigard City Hall. This criterion is met Resistant to flood damage. All new construction and substantial improvements, including manufactured homes, shall be constructed with materials and utility equipment resistant to flood damage. There is no equipment that would need to be flood proof. The pipe is open on both ends, and in the event that the pond floods, water will be able to travel either way. Minimize flood damage. All new construction and substantial improvements, including manufactured homes, shall be constructed using methods and practices that minimize flood damage. Equipment protection. Electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing, and air-conditioning equipment and other service facilities shall be designed and/or otherwise elevated or (ocated so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components during conditions of flooding. There are no new service facilities associated with this improvement. Water Suppfy Systems. All new and replacement water supply systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of floodwater into tFie system. There are no new water supply systems proposed with this application. Anchoring. All new construction, all manufactured homes and substantial improvements shall be anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement of the structure. The outfall will be buried, and will not be subject to flotation. Sanitary sewerage systems. New and replacement sanitary sewerage systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of floodwater into the systems and discharge from the systems into floodwater. There are no new or replacement sanitary sewerage systems associated with this proposal. CITY OF TIGARD/HALL BLVD.OUTFALL PROJECT PAGE 4 OF 8 10/15/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER On-site water disposal systems. On-site water disposal systems shall be located to avoid impairment to them or contamination from them during flooding. There are no on-site detention facilities associated with this proposal because it lays directly adjacent to Fanno Creek. This criterion is met. Residential Construction. New construction and substantial improvement of any residential structure, including manufactured homes, shall have the lowest floor, inc(uding the basement, elevated at least one foot above base flood elevation; This standard does not apply as the purpose of this construction is for institutional purposes. Nonresidential Construction. New construction and substantial improvement of any commercial, industrial, or other nonresidential structure shall either have the lowest floor, including basement, elevated to the level of the base flood elevation, or together with attendant utility and sanitary facilities, shall: Be flood-proofed so that below the base flood level the structure is watertight with walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water; Have structural components capable of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and effects of buoyancy; Be certified by a registered professional engineer or architect that the desi�n and methods of construction are in accordance with accepted standards of practice for meeting provisions of this subsection based on their development and/or review of the structural design, specifications and plans. Such certifications shall be provided to the Building Official as set forth in Subsection 18.775.030 E2; and Non-residential structures that are elevated, not flood-proofed, must meet the same standards for space below the lowest floor as described in 18.775.040 L2. Applicants flood-proofing nonresidential buildings shall be notified that flood insurance premiums will be based on rates that are one foot below the flood-proofed level �e.g., a building constructed to the base flood level will be rated as one foot below that, evel). As discussed previously, there are no new structures associated with this development. The proposal calls for a stormwater outfall pipe to discharge water into Fanno Creek. Subdivisions and partitions in 100-year floodplain. Subdivisions and partitions in the 100-year floodplain shall meet the following criteria: This proposal does not involve a subdivision or partition. Within the 100-year floodplain The Hearings Officer shall approve, approve with conditions or deny an application request within the 100-year floodplain based upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied: Land form alterations shall preserve or enhance the floodplain storage function and maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway shall not result in any encroachments, including fill, new construction, substantial imQrovements and other development unless certified by a registered professional engineer that the encroachment will not result in any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge; CITY OF TIGARDMALL BLVD.OUTFALL PROJECT PAGE 5 OF 8 10/15/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER The applicant has provided a letter from Greg Berry, P.E., indicating that the proposed outfall will remove about forty cubic yards of material, make the improvement, and restore the grade back to its natural state. Any excess soil will be disposed of off site. He indicates that there will be no alterations within the floodplain that will reduce floodplain storage or the ability of the floodplain to maintain the zero-rise floodway. This criterion has been satisfied. Land form alterations or developments within the 100-year floodplain shall be allowed only in areas designated as commercial or industrial on the comprehensive plan land use map, except that alterations or developments associated with community recreation uses, utilities, or public support facilities as defined in Chapter 18.120 of the Community Developmenf Code shall be allowed in areas designated residential subject to appficable zoning standards; The alterations that are proposed within the floodway are proposed to accommodate placement of the stormwater outfall. These items are identified as utilities within Chapter 18.120 of the Tigard Development Code (TDC) and are, therefore, permitted activities withm the 100-year floodplain. This criterion is satisfied. Where a land form alteration or development is permitted to occur within the floodplain it will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100- year flood; As discussed earlier, the applicant has indicated that no proposed activity will increase the water surface elevation of the 100-year flood. If the grade is brought back to its natural state, staff concurs. This criterion is satisfied. The land form alteration or development plan includes a pedestrian/bicycle pathway in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan, unless the construcfion of said pathway is deemed by the Hearings Officer as untimely; The Fanno Creek Trail system will be located on the site consistent with the Regional Transportation Plan, and the adopted Transportation Systems Plan. The construction of the trail has been previously conditioned with the approva( of the conditional use permit for the new City Library. Additionally, the City has obtained a $50,000 grant to ensure construction of that portion of the trail. This criterion is met. The plans for the pedestrian/bicycle pathway indicate that no pathway will be below � the elevation of an average annual flood. This criterion is not applicable to this proposal. The necessary U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board, Division of State Lands (DSL) approvals shall be obtained; and The applicant has provided proof of approval for the work from the US Army Cor s of Engineers, but has not provided approval from the Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL� FINDING: The applicant has not provided any evidence that would indicate that no approval from the Oregon DSL is necessary for the work that is proposed within the 100-year floodway. The US Army Corps of Engineers has issued a permit for the work dated July 22, 2003. CONDITIONS: ➢ Prior to site work, the applicant shall provide evidence in writing from the Oregon DSL that the proposed work is approved. ➢ The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval that are required by the decision issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers dated July 22, 2003. CITY OF TIGARDMALL BLVD.OUTFALL PROJECT PAGE 6 OF 8 10/15/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Where land form alterations andlor development are allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require the consideration of dedication of sufficient open land area w�thin and adjacent to the floodplain in accordance with the comprehensive plan. This area shall include portions of a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrianlbicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. The property already belongs to the City, and the construction of the trail has been previously conditioned with the approval of the conditional use permit for the new City Library. This criterion is satisfied. Within draina ewa s. The Director shall approve, ap�rove with conditions or deny an app ica ion reques or a sensitive lands permit within drainageways based upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied: The extent and nature of the proposed land form alteration or development will not create site disturbances to an extent greater than the minimum required for the use; The applicant has indicated that there will be no permanent land form alteration, and that the site will be disturbed to the minimum extent necessary to place the outfall. They add that the work area will be restored to its previous state once the outfall is placed. In complying with the conditions of approval and subsequent approvals from CWS, ODSL, and the Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), this criterion is satisfied. The proposed land form alteration or development will not result in erosion, stream sedimentation, ground instability, or other adverse on-site and off-site effects or hazards to life or property; There is no evidence in the record to suggest that this project will result in hazards to life or property. The project is subject to an erosion control plan with Clean Water Services as the enforcement agency; If for any reason the work failed to comply with these standards, the project would be sub�ect to joint enforcement from CWS and the City of Tigard. The water flow capacity of the drainageway is not decreased; The proposed development will not alter the water flow capacity of the existing drainageway. Where natural vegetation has been removed due to land form alteration or development, the areas not covered by structures or impervious surfaces will be replanted to prevent erosion in accordance with Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; The applicant has received approval from Clean Water Service by way of a service provider letter. The service provider letter requires the applicant to remove non-native vegetation, and provide a landscape and maintenance plan to ensure that the area of disturbance is replanted, and that the slope of the bank is not compromised by the work. Compliance with the conditions of approval from the service provider letter will satisfy this criterion. FINDING: The applicant has obtained approval from CWS to complete the proposed work provided the applicant satisfies the conditions of that letter. CONDITION: The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval from the CWS service provider letter file #3181 during all phases of construction. The drainageway will be replaced by a public facility of adequate size to accommodate maximum flow in accordance with the adopted 1981 Master Drainage Plan; The drainageway will remain intact. No replacement is necessary. CITY OF TIGARD/HALL BLVD.OUTFALL PROJECT PAGE 7 OF 8 10/15/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Tree Removal (18.790) ec ion . requires that a tree plan for the plantin , removal and protection of trees prepared�by a certified arborist shall be�provided wit� a site development review a�plication. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees identification o a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inc�es in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program,defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees dur�ng and after construction. A tree survey and protection plan from Halstead Arboriculture Consultants was submitted for this property with the City Library project. Staff has visited the location and determined that there will be no trees affected by this work. The nearest tree to the proposed construction is fifty plus feet. All tree protection measures are in place, and have been verified by the City's Ar6onst. This criterion has been satisfied. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed this application, but offered no commen�s. The City of Tigard Engineering Department was sent this proposal for review and stated that they have no additional comments to add to the application. City of Tigard Arborist has reviewed this application and stated that he has no objections to the work. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Clean Water Services has reviewed the proposal, and stated that all improvements must be in compliance with the CWS service provider letter and current Design and Construction Standards. (Contact Lee Walker or Heidi Berg) Washin�ton County has reviewed the proposal and indicated that they have no comments or objections to the proposal. The US Army Corps of Engineers, Oregon DEQ, Oregon DSL, Ore�on DFW, Metro, and ODOT were given the opportunity to review this proposal and submitted no comments or objections. � October 2 2003 . r i y Associate Planner �.---- _. � � October 2 2003 . ic ar ewers Planning Mana r CITY OF TIGARDMALL BLVD.OUTFALL PROJECT PAGE 8 OF 8 10/15/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER . . GEOGRRPHIC INFORMNTIOM SYSTEM I � � YICINITY �'IAP � � , i BURNHAM = _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ � SLR2003-00009 HALL B�ULEVARD CULVERT EXTENSION � � ��P o � � �� ; .� ! J � � w, a f�� ,5*1..1L+ �R�k m �\,. �.� " tw...i' t .�..... � �� . � .., FE � Y P P :`: SIT��;�� :�� i __ �- � � �,� � ;;. , � �= �� :�,s,;�,W� � � . : � � � � . � �� :, �. % �t ' � � ��\ � � �,�,utmRp... Y..QP , ' onira o � • " \ : '�nd-� m;-@_ .�... \ '---... �� . ��bR�� .% �j__ ;�� f--L�3tt9M-r-.._C.LIZ�J � �" � f• __. Tqartl Area Map ' � � � . , N O'MARA 0 100 200 300 400 Feet i 1'=31�fcel J J Q Cit�•of Ti�ard _ _ _ InformaUOn m this map is for general locatlon oMy and ahould be varlfied w;th the OeveloD�t Servlces Olvlelon. 73125 SW Hall Blvd � Tigard,OR 97223 y (503)839-4171 http:/M�w.v.ci.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Sep 18,2003;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR � ^� � � � �� o � 0 N " O � � � `� m � > : � `� � � � � � � � �' � Q � , v � Z � � � �r ' qIl 00 m � �, , I � � ; I� ,� � S� -_ __ _ _n 9oa �.a.�irF�,�,�_�n i�cb �!� ' y ^ - � HALL BOULEVARD — '"a' —,,.�=—n �ac�o .L._ �t ,JOO ��" � Q _—__ Z � v -- - -----� _ --=-— .--� � •� ,'.°° -��°°`=—�-�� __ n �o, `_`_I W � B ''m � �;�;=- -- _n_ � / ' " .,...... .... + --�.- _ n so, �\TL IAO , ,� 1��=i� _- . _.;_ .. ..., �w , ,_.__ , �'� • .. .......... �.... �- _ •a� - - .�ocation otCu/vert n .rc� i � n aa� � ��, --�— - '_,�� _ „� lo be�xtended � � i n ,� � n soo i � , _ —s ``'— I I � ' L..��t/�wov�av,�o� � \ n�-� M7I/A / / I' IFANNO PO/NTE i �i PROP�S D T/GARD �"=�•K�� 1 DEVELOPMENT rl�'�i L/BR4RY /TE A ro� _ �' � p p m a f e L o c a t i o n I a � i � of Pro qosed Bioswa/e r � 1 J I r ii � �� i i i /, C I i i i i i IApProximate Location - m �� i i�� of Fanno Creek .-�� < �, � �� , � � �- a � t ti 7v � > >� � � p m � � �� I /, � a c� � � w R' � �� C � = z � , r p� v , < w �' T � � m � O y � � � � � T �' � m � T Z H O Z CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION p� . 4._�a,. � .Y�..�_ h�„� .�« ,. �;_. E, �.. �� • • � • • � • � • • � � • w�� -.f,��._ � ' �.= a� � °� � � � � , � � � � � � �� ' „�, , • , � . �'i `� HEARINGS �FFICER �� } �'` WEDNESDAY— OCTOBER 15,'20U3 - 7:00 PM �_ ��'�� V �■ Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Hearings Officer mee6ngs by noon on the Friday prior to the meeting. Please call 503-639-4171, Ext. 2438 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deafl. Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments and qual�ed bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. To request such services, please notify the City of Tigard of your need(s) by 5:00 p.m., no less than one (1) week prior to the meeting date at the same phone numbers listed above so that we can make the appropriate arrangements. Hearings are held in Town Hall at the City of Tigard at 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Staff repo�ts are available to the public 7 days prior to the hearing date 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PUBLIC HEARING 2.1 BINGHAM DUPLEX CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2003-00008 The applicant is seeking approval to build a duplex on a 10,000 square foot parcel that was created as part of a 3-lot minor land partition in December of 2001. The pattition was known as the Bingham Pa�tition (MLP2001-00013). LOCATION: On the west side of SW 97"' Avenue, south of the future Mountain View Lane extension; WCTM 2S111 BA, Tax Lot 1201. ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Telecommunication facilities are conditionally permitted. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790 and 18.795. (Continued) Page 1 of 2 -�SUBJECT TO CHANGE� 2.2 HALL BOULEVARD CULVERT EXTENSION SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 2003-00009 The City of Tigard is seeking approval to extend a stormwater outfall into the floodway along Fanno Creek. The outfall would serve to convey treated stormwater from the water quality facility to the waterway. The water quality facility receives the excess runoff created from the Hall Blvd. half-street improvement. LOCATION: 13360 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 2S102DA, Tax Lot 600. ZONE: R-12; Medium Density Residential: The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.390, 18.510, 18.775 and 18.790. 3. OTHER BUSINESS 4. ADJOURNMENT _..:_ . -*e i�y .�� .�.�_ � _ �+��Atu��= _ __ _ __- Page 2 of 2 r Agenda Item: 2.2 Hearin Date: October 15 2003 Time: 7:00 PM STAFF REPORT T� THE HEARINGS OFFICER ��oFT��ARo Community<UeveCopmeni FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Shapingl`��QtterCommunity 120 DAYS = 12/3112003 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: HALL BLVD. CULVERT EXTENSION CASE NO: Sensitive Lands Review (SLR) SLR2003-00009 OWNER/ City of Tigard APPLICANT: Attn: Vannie Nguyen 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested approval to extend a stormwater outFall into the floodway along Fanno Creek. The outfall would serve to convey treated stormwater from the water quality facility to the waterway. The water quality facility receives the excess runoff created from the Hall Blvd. Half street improvement. LOCATION: 13360 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 2S102DA, Tax Lot 600. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN and ZONING DESIGNATION: R-12; Medium Density Residential: The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.390, 18.510, 18.775, and 18.790 SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Hearings O�cer find that the pro�osed Site Development Review, Sensitive Lands, and Water Resources Overlay Review wil not adversely afFect the health, safety and welfare of the City and meets the Approval Standards. Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to the following recommended Conditions of Approval: CITY OF TIGARDlHALL BLVD.OUTFALL PROJECT PAGE 1 OF 8 10/15/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER � CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMITS: u mit to t e anning epartment ra i y, 639 7 , ext. 34 or review an approval: 1. Prior to site work, the applicant shall provide evidence in writing from the Oregon DSL that the proposed work is approved. 2. The applicant shall compIy with all conditions of approval that are required by the decision issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers dated July 22, 2003. 3. The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval from the Clean Water Services (CWS) service provider letter file #3181 during all phases of construction. FAILURE TO SATISFY THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITHIN 18 MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION SHALL RENDER THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION VOID. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site Histo : e site is currently occupied by an existing single-family residence and an out building. The two buildings were constructed within the floodway and floodplain when they were originally built. As a result of a recent fire, it is anticipated that the City will demolish and remove the existing buildings on the site. The proposal is for a stormwater outfall that serves to convey water from the water quality facility and discharge it into Fanno Creek. Vicinit Information: e site is zone R-12 and surrounded by a mixture of multi-family, single-family, and industrial development. The site is also adjacent to Fanno Creek and Hall Blvd. A portion of the site is being developed by the City for a new library. The City is also involved in a separate study to construct Wall Street, a street connection between SW Hall Blvd. and SW Hunziker that would be aligned along the southern portion of this site. Site Information and Pro osal Descri tion: e site is current y eve ope wit a single-family home and an out building. The site slopes east to west and is within both the floodplain and the floodway. As a condition of approval for the library project, the City was required to construct a half-street improvement along SW Hall Blvd. This proposed outfall would convey stormwater that has been treated from the additional impervious surFace of that improvement into Fanno Creek. SECTION IV. DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES, PERMITS AND USE Use Classification: Section 18.130.020 �s s e se a egories. The applicant is proposin� to construct a stormwater outfall into the Fanno Creek and it's associated floodway. Basic Utilities are permitted conditionally in this zone with the exception of water, storm, and sanitary sewers, which are outright permitted within the R-12 zoning district. Summa Land Use Permits: Chapter 18.310 e ines t e ecision-ma �ng type to which the land-use application is assigned. CITY OF TIGARD/HALL BLVD.OUTFALL PROJECT PAGE 2 OF 8 10/15/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER The proposed proJ ect would typically not be sub1'ect to review as it is an outright permitted use in the R-12 zone; however, because a portion of the proJ'ect impacts the floodway, this request is subject to review before the City of Tigard Hearings Officer as a Type III-HO review. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA A summary of the applicable criteria in this case in the Chapter order in which they are addressed in this report are as follows: A. A licable Develo ment Code Standards ecision- a ing roce ures 18.510 Residentia� Zoning Districts) 18.775 Sensitive Lands Review) 18.790 Tree Removal) SECTION VI. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS A. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. According to Table 18.510.1, basic utilities excluding water, storm, and sanitary sewers are subject to conditional use approval. The proposal is to extend a stormwater outfall mto the Fanno Creek Floodway. There are no structures associated with the proposal, and no new lots are being created as a result of the proposal. Therefore, there are no applicable development standards (i.e. setbacks, lot width, etc.) for this proposal. FINDING: Based on the information provided in the narrative and on the site plan, the development standards of the R-12 zone are not applicable to this proposal. Sensitive Lands (18.775) e earings a�ficer sfiall have the authority to issue a sensitive lands permit in the 100-year floodplain by means of a Type fllA procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.050, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.775.OT0 B-E The proposal involves placing a storm outfall within the vegetated corridor and 100-year floodway of Fanno Creek. This proposal is considered by the Tigard Hearings Officer. 18.775.040 General Provisions for Floodplain Areas. Permit review. The appropriate approval authority shall review all permit applications to determine whether proposed building sites will be safe from flooding. Special flood hazard. The areas of special flood hazard identified by the Federal Insurance Administration in a scientiFc and engineering report entitled "The Flood Insurance Study of the City of Tigard," dated September 1, 1981, with accompanying Flood Insurance 11Aaps (updated February 1984 is hereby adopted by reference and declared to be a part of this chapter. This F�ood Insurance Study is on file at the Tigard Civic Center. The applicant and staff have reviewed these maps and a�ree that this site is within one of the identified special flood hazard areas. The application is being reviewed under this premise. CITY OF TIGARD/HALL BLVD.OUTFALL PROJECT PAGE 3 OF 8 10/15/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Base flood elevation data. When base flood elevation data has not been provided in accordance with Subsection B above, the Director shall obtain, review and reasonably utilize any base flood elevation and floodway data available from a federal, state or other source, in order to administer Subsections M and N below. According to the City Floodplain Maps, the base flood elevation has been identified at 143.8 to 143.9. This cnterion is met Test of reasonableness. Where elevation data is not available either through the Flood Insurance Studx or from another authoritative source, a�plications for building permits shall be reviewed to assure that proposed construction will be reasonably safe from flooding. The test of reasonableness is a local judgment and includes use of historical data, high water marks, photographs of past flooding: etc., where available. Failure to elevate at least two feet above grade in these sensitive land areas may result in higher insurance rates. As discussed previously, the elevation data is available on the maps that are available within Tigard City Hall. This criterion is met Resistant to flood damage. All new construction and substantial improvements, including manufactured homes, shall be constructed with materials and utility equipment resistant to flood damage. There is no equipment that would need to be flood proof. The pipe is open on both ends, and in the event that the pond floods, water will be able to travel either way. Minimize flood damage. All new construction and substantial improvements, including manufactured homes, shall be constructed using methods and practices that minimize flood damage. Equipment protection. Electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing, and air-conditioning equipment and other service facilities shall be designed and/or otherwise elevated or located so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components during conditions of flooding. There are no new service facilities associated with this improvement. Water Supply Systems. All new and replacement water supply systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of floodwater into the system. There are no new water supply systems proposed with this application. Anchoring. All new construction, all manufactured homes and substantial improvements shall be anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement of the structure. The outfall will be buried, and will not be subject to flotation. Sanitary sewerage systems. New and replacement sanitary sewerage systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of floodwater into the systems and discharge from the systems into floodwater. There are no new or replacement sanitary sewerage systems associated with this proposal. CITY OF TIGARD/HALL BLVD.OUTFALL PROJECT PAGE 4 OF 8 10/15/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER On-site water disposal systems. On-site water disposal systems shall be located to avoid impairment to them or contamination from them during flooding. There are no on-site detention facilities associated with this proposal because it lays directly adjacent to Fanno Creek. This criterion is met. Residential Construction. New construction and substantial improvement of any residential structure, including manufactured homes, shall have the lowest floor, including the basement, elevated at least one foot above base flood elevation; This standard does not apply as the purpose of this construction is for institutional purposes. Nonresidential Construction. New construction and substantial improvement of any commercial, industrial, or other nonresidential structure shall either have the lowest floor, including basement, elevated to the level of the base flood elevation, or together with attendant utility and sanitary facilities, shall: Be flood-proofed so that below the base flood level the structure is watertight with walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water; Have structural components capable of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and effects of buoyancy; Be certified by a registered professional engineer or architect that the desi�n and methods of construction are in accordance with accepted standards of practice for meeting provisions of this subsection based on their development and/or review of the structural design, specifications and plans. Such certifications shall be provided to the Building Official as set forth in Subsection 18.775.030 E2; and Non-residential structures that are elevated, not flood-proofed, must meet the same standards for space below the lowest floor as described in 18.775.040 L2. Applicants flood-proofing nonresidential buildings shall be notified that flood �nsurance premiums w�ll be based on rates that are one foot below the flood-proofed level (e.g., a building constructed to the base flood level will be rated as one foot below that.level). As discussed previously, there are no new structures associated with this development. The proposal calls for a stormwater outfall pipe to discharge water into Fanno Creek. Subdivisions and partitions in 100-year floodplain. Subdivisions and partitions in the 100-year floodplain shall meet the following criteria: This proposal does not involve a subdivision or partition. Within the 100-year floodplain The Hearings Officer shall approve, approve with conditions or deny an application request within the 100-year floodplain based upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied: Land form alterations shall preserve or enhance the floodplain storage function and maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway shall not result in any encroachments, including fill, new construction, substantial im�rovements and other development unless certified by a registered professional engineer that the encroachment will not result in any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge; CITY OF TIGARD/HALL BLVD.OUTFALL PROJECT PAGE 5 OF 8 10/15/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER The applicant has provided a letter from Greg Berry, P.E., indicating that the proposed outfall will remove about forty cubic yards of material, make the improvement, and restore the grade back to its natural state. Any excess soil will be disposed of off site. He indicates that there will be no alterations within the floodplain that will reduce floodplain storage or the ability of the floodplain to maintain the zero-rise floodway. This criterion has been satisfied. Land form alterations or developments within the 100-year floodplain shall be allowed only in areas designated as commercial or industrial on the comprehensive plan land use map, except that alterations or developments associated with community recreation uses, utilities, or public support facilities as defined in Chapter 18.120 of the Community Development Code shatl be allowed in areas designated residential subject to applicable zoning standards; The alterations that are proposed within the floodway are proposed to accommodate placement of the stormwater outfall. These items are identified as utilities within Cha�ter 18.120 of the Tigard Development Code (TDC) and are, therefore, permitted activities within the 100-year floodplain. This criterion is satisfied. Where a land form alteration or development is permitted to occur within the floodplain it will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100- year flood; As discussed earlier, the applicant has indicated that no proposed activity will increase the water surface elevation of the 100-year flood. If the grade is brought back to its natural state, staff concurs. This criterion is satisfied. The land form alteration or development plan includes a pedestrian/bicycle pathway in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan, unless the construct�on of said pathway is deemed by the Hearings Officer as untimely; The Fanno Creek Trail system will be located on the site consistent with the Regional Transportation Plan, and the adopted Transportation Systems Plan. The construction of the trail has been previously conditioned with the approvaf of the conditional use permit for the new City Library. Additionally, the City has obtained a $50,000 grant to ensure construction of that portion of the trail. This criterion is met. The plans for the pedestrian/bicycle pathway indicate that no pathway will be below � the elevation of an average annual flood. This criterion is not applicable to this proposal. The necessary U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board, Division of State Lands (DSL) approvals shall be obtained; and The applicant has provided proof of approval for the work from the US Army Cor s of Engineers, but has not provided approval from the Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL� FINDING: The applicant has not provided any evidence that would indicate that no approval from the Oregon DSL is necessary for the work that is �roposed within the 100-year floodway. The US Army Corps of Engineers has issued a permit for the work dated July 22, 2003. CONDITIONS: ➢ Prior to site work, the applicant shall provide evidence in writing from the Oregon DSL that the proposed work is approved. ➢ The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval that are required by the decision issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers dated July 22, 2003. CITY OF TIGARD/HALL BLVD.OUTFALL PROJECT PAGE 6 OF 8 10/15/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER J Where land form alterations and/or development are allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require the consideration of dedication of sufficient open land area within and adjacent to the floodplain in accordance with the comprehensive plan. This area shall include portions of a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. The property already belongs to the City, and the construction of the trail has been previously conditioned with the approval of the conditional use permit for the new City Library. This criterion is satisfied. Within draina ewa s. The Director shall approve, approve with conditions or deny an app ica ion reques or a sensitive lands permit w�thin drainageways based upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied: The extent and nature of the proposed land form alteration or development will not create site disturbances to an extent greater than the minimum required for the use; The applicant has indicated that there will be no permanent land form alteration, and that the site will be disturbed to the minimum extent necessary to place the outfall. They add that the work area will be restored to its previous state once the outfall is placed_ In complying with the conditions of approval and subsequent approvals from CWS, ODSL, and the Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), this criterion is satisfied. The proposed land form alteration or development will not result in erosion, stream sedimentation, ground instability, or other adverse on-site and off-site effects or hazards to life or property; There is no evidence in the record to suggest that this project will result in hazards to life or property. The project is subject to an erosion control plan with Clean Water Services as the enforcement agency: If for any reason the work failed to comply with these standards, the project would be sub�ect to joint enforcement from CWS and the City of Tigard. The water flow capacity of the drainageway is not decreased; The proposed development will not alter the water flow capacity of the existing drainageway. Where natural vegetation has been removed due to land form alteration or development, the areas not covered by structures or impervious surfaces will be replanted to prevent erosion in accordance with Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; The applicant has received approval from Clean Water Service by way of a service provider letter. The service provider letter requires the applicant to remove non-native vegetation, and provide a landscape and maintenance plan to ensure that the area of disturbance is replanted, and that the slope of the bank is not compromised b�r the work. Compliance with the conditions of approval from the service provider letter will satisfy this criterion. FINDING: The applicant has obtained approval from CWS to complete the proposed work provided the applicant satisfies the conditions of that letter. CONDITION: The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval from the CWS service provider letter file #3181 during all phases of construction. The drainageway will be replaced by a public facility of adequate size to accommodate maximum flow in accordance with the adopted 198'( Master Drainage Plan; The drainageway will remain intact. No replacement is necessary. CITY OF TIGARD/HALL BLVD.OUTFALL PROJECT PAGE 7 OF 8 10/15/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Tree Removal (18.790) 3�ion . . requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided witi� a site development review a�plication. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees identification o a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inc�es in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program.defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. A tree survey and protection plan from Halstead Arboriculture Consultants was submitted for this property with the City Library project. Staff has visited the location and determined that there will be no trees affected by this work. The nearest tree to the proposed construction is fifty plus feet. All tree protection measures are in place, and have been verified by the City's Arborist. This criterion has been satisfied. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed this application, but offered no comments. The City of Tigard Engineering Department was sent this proposal for review and stated that they have no additional comments to add to the application. City of Tigard Arborist has reviewed this application and stated that he has no objections to the work. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Clean Water Services has reviewed the proposal, and stated that all improvements must be in compliance with the CWS service provider letter and current Design and Construction Standards. (Contact Lee Walker or Heidi Berg) Washin�ton County has reviewed the proposal and indicated that they have no comments or objections to the proposal. The US Army Corps of Engineers, Oregon DEQ, Oregon DSL, Ore�on DFW, Metro, and ODOT were given the opportunity to review this proposal and submitted no comments or objections. � October 2 2003 . r i y Associate Planner �----._ _... • �`�' October 2 2003 . ic ar ewers Planning Mana r CITY OF TIGARD/HALL BLVD.OUTFALL PROJECT PAGE 8 OF 8 10/15/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER . . GEOOFAPHiC iNFORMATiO4 SvSTEM '' '� v�aN�rr r�a� � � BURNHAM = _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ S1R2003-00009 ', � _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ � � HALL BOULEVARD � � CULVERT EXTENSION � � ,. � �� . �\�P �'� ��,! „ ` ; — J �� \,,� �7 :'�7A�I.Ga c�� , � " � � m � � `�` u. '" � ) _ . ' R 1 1 �� 1 � �YR'�• L� -� � � ' �,�� 4 �/ /'_' �i . _' •\ 3, ..... � ��ti P � SITE��.�� ` � ;� ' �-� �� ; � ��. ;`�,`�,��, ; _ j V t <C gt \�'�� . .�� e . • �. � ��` :,_� �`,�� }auu�RRq�� ..`�� m}�.nnira� �.�.. ��,� �:`�� . ._ n ,;,� � � �,I�� ,;:. t ° . r�JEF BENV RU 1..."S��lM1 ,�p� 1��,',.�'4 "_' S�' ` i�' �.� :��.,� a,,.- ��,i ��t� ��° \ Tpartl Aroa Map ' � � �. �`� . �� . I N O'MARA � 0 100 2D0 300 400 Feet i'�317 feet I J JQ I = I � Citr'ot`I'igard � � InfortnaUOn m this map is fa general Iceatim anly and shoulA be venfied with the�evelopment Serv�Ces DiviSion. 13125 SW Hall BNd Q Tgard,OR 97223 , I I (503)6334171 http:/MMw.d.11gard.Or.Us Ccmmunity Development Plot date:Sep 18,2003;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR 3 ^� � � � �� o � 0 y � o� . � � m � � � � �o � � � � 5 � � � � � � ^ Z � � � z � � � � �, o m � �� ' I � � o � � I � ' � -• ... . _._._ n soo �.B.s��,�� n »cn ��. ' � ^ ,. � SbU HALL B�OULEVARD — �"—=�«��=--� 1?°'0 .L_ _ "_,soo P�� Q __ ... ------ _ .__.° --�� ","'s.�--=+00_— �ym �.� � __ n �o� ___ _I W � n a� v -�. - ---+_ - � ,,a;'==-'��_�r� --- _ _ _. �I n �o' \7L *A� .. ..., "� —`°�'a° ��„qp -�_ .�..�'��_ Z _� R�' • ., ......... i..... __`� `-i--w� `� _ „� . .,- - .�ocation ot Cu/vert rc .rc� i � n �o�o � ��, _�� _ ,,,� to be Qxtended i � � ,z ,c� � n sao � , _ �--- i �..,,r, � i I � � R�uo.t�.�a,.kw�ac� \ n`�'soo - - 1MIN A ! l I' IFANNO PO/NTE i �i PROPOS O T/GARD �'=�•K�� 1 OEl/ELOPMENT i��i L/BR4RY /TE A �oxirnefe L _ � PP ocation I a I i � of P�oqosed Biosws/e � „ , � i � �� C I i i i i i I A'°PrOximate Localion -/ m �� i1 i f ofFanno C�eek �'� < �+ � 1' , � I /, a � t � �� G p m 1� �� I // n � � � � � C c,a m � � � : Z � , r o v � � r �? T � � � +� � '� w -i � cni x T �' �'C m � rn z N � Z CITY �F TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION 6� . ' Bradl�y Kilby�App 30482 Page 1 From: GOODRIDGE Jennifer <jennifer.goodridge@dsl.state.or.us> To: "'vannie@ci.tigard.or.us"' <vannie@ci.tigard.or.us> Date: 10/1/03 4:46PM Subject: App 30482 Vannie DSL file#App 30482 authorizes both activities outlined in the application: the culvert extension and the bioswale outfall to Fanno Creek. Despite the fact that the letter only refers to the culvert extension, the letter also states that this permit authorizes all activities described within the permit application. Therefore, App 30482 authorizes a culvert extension under Hall Blvd. and the bioswale outfall into Fanno Creek. Please forward this email for clarification to the planning staff at the City of Tigard. Let me know if you have other questions. Thanks- Jennifer Goodridge Natural Resource Coordinator Division of State Lands 775 Summer St NE Suite 100 Satem, OR 97302 Ph (503) 378-3805 ext. 233 Fax (503)378-4844 http://www.oregonstatelands.us/ � ` , , 1-1�-!' ]!�� ;-F�� -; , I iy,�} �x �+.�„:��,�, . � F.,.. �Q�� :�'��'�:�, Division of State Lands H : �, . . "'`• - ��'i' � �� 775 Summer Street NE, Suitc 100 �t � Theodore IZ. Kulung��ski,Govcrnur � li � � � Selem, �R 97301-1279 ,_e s9 (',' ' � � (503) 378-3805 D FAX (503) 378-4844 June 11, 2003 JUN j �j 20Q3 www.oregonstatelands.us. CM02/30482 �'' � • �,�— State Land Board CITY OF TIGARD � ;u,yRp ATTN: VANNIE NGUYEN T1�eodore R. Kulongoski Governor 13125 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD OR 97223 B�i� a<<,a��,ry Secretary of State RE: General Authorization for Transportation-Related Structures DSL Application Number 30482-GA Randall Edwards T02S, R02E, Seetion 1 D Tax Lots 300 & 600, City of Tigard, Washi�gton County`easurer Dear Ms. Nguyen: On May 19, 2003, we received your complete application to extend a culvert on Pinebrook Creek, a tributary of Fanno Creek, for the widening of Hall Boulevard. Based on our review of your application, and comments provided by interested resource agencies, we hereby authorize the project, subject to the conditions outlined in OAR 141-089-0190 (enclosed) and to the following additional conditions: 1. Fill and removal activities in Pinebrook Creek shall be conducted between June 1 and September 30, unless otherwise coordinated with ODFW and approved in writing by ODSL. This authorization permits only the work described in the application. Please notify this office when the work is complete. If additional work needs to be done in the future, a new application must be submitted. This authorization expires January 1, 2006. Please be aware that this authorization is not a land use approval. You must also receive authorization, when required, from the local planning department and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers before beginning censtruc±ion. �f y�u have any questi�ns regard;ng this a�thor�zation or its conditio^s, please contact Colin MacLaren at extension 244. Sincerely, � Lori Warner Manager Field Operations — Western/Eastern Region cM:�W Enclosure c: Kathryn Harris, Corps of Engineers Todd Alsbury, ODFW J:�AttachmentAwestLAS\GA General Authorizations130482-GA Road.doc . . , General Authorization for Certain Transportation-Related Structures Terms used within the General Authorization are defined in OAR 141 -085-0010 General Authorization for Certain Transportation-Related Structures 141-089-0170 Purpose and Applicability (1) This rule sets forth conditions under which a person may, without obtaining an individual removal-fill permit, may place or remove material from waters of the state (as described in OAR 141-085-0016), except within estuaries and the Pacific Ocean, for certain transportation-related structures including roads, railroads, culverts, bridges, bicycle lanes trails. (2) A letter of authorization from the Agency is required prior to any person commencing an activity authorized by this general authorization. The term and conditions of issuance shall be stated in the letter of authorization. The term shall not exceed the expiration date of this general authorization. A letter of authorization is transferable to another person in accordance with OAR 141-085-0034. (3) This general authorization is made pursuant to ORS 196.850 and is based upon the determination that the authorized activities are similar in nature and when conducted in accordance with this general authorization r�l� will not result in long term harm tc wa:er resources of the state, and will cause only minimal individual and cumulative environmental impacts. (4) This general authorization does not apply to activities or waters exempt from the removal-fill law as described in OAR 141-085-0015 and OAR 141-085-0020. (5) Other structures, uses or activities included in any application for this general authorization that are subject to another general authorization under OAR 141-089 or individual permit under OAR 141-085 will not be authorized or covered by this general authorization. An application encompassing multiple activities must obtain an individual removal-fill permit under OAR 141-085. (6) Uniess otherwise specified, the terms used in this general authorization are defined in OAR 141-085-0010. (7) Activities and/or projects, which qualify for this general authorization, are exempt from removal-fill permit fees as described in OAR 141-085-0064. (8) In the event a dispute arises as to the applicability of this general authorization to any project application, the Agency shall make the final determination. The Agency shall rely upon the applicanYs project application and supporting documentation for its decision. Stat. Auth.: ORS 196.850 Stats. Implemented: ORS 196.800- 196.990; ORS 390.805-390.925 Hist.: DSL 6-2002, f. 11-25-02 cert. ef. 1-15-03 OAR 141-089-0175 Eligibility Requirements; Ineligible Projects (1) In order to issue a letter of authorization the Agency shall determine that the project is eligible and meets the applicable Mandatory Requirements as described in this rule. To be eligible a project must: (a) Be for the following purposes: (A) Widening shoulder for new roadside embankment, curbs, trails, sidewalks and rail crossings; (B) Widening road for additional passing lanes, turn lanes and refuges and travel lanes; (C) Widening, realigning or removing existing railroad beds; (D) Widening, realigning or removing existing roads; (E) Widening, realigning or removing existing bridges or similar structures; (F) Widening, realigning or removing existing bicycle, pedestrian or other lanes or � trails; (G) Constructing new bicycle, pedestrian or other lanes or trails; (H) Replacement of culve�ts or similar water conveyance stn.�ctures along roads and trails that extend beyond the existing road prism; (I) Construction of new culverts; (J) Extension of existing culverts beyond the existing road prism; (K) Streambank stabilization associated with projects listed in (A) through (J); and (L) Hydraulic scour protection associated with bridges and similar structures including but not limited to: construction of a new trench and stone embankment; construction of new bridge footings; placing new riprap to stabilize a transpo�tation structure foundation. (b) Be for no more than a total of five thousand (5000) cubic yards of material filled, removed, or altered in waters of the state for a single and complete project. (c) Be for streambank stabilization associated with a transportation-related project as listed ahc�ve, w.ith n� mar� than one thousand (1,OOQ) cubic y:rc+s �f r„aterial placed in a one-quarter mile reach of waters of the state for a single project or two thousand (2,000) cubic yards for multiple-related projects within a subbasin. (d) Involve fill in wetlands of 0.5 acres or less for projects as described above in (a). (e) Be for test holes, borings and similar activities associated with planning and design of transportation structures. . (2) A project is not eligible for this general authorization if: (a) The project is not a transportation-related structure as described above; (b) The project fails to meet any of the requirements of(1) above or the mandatory requirements; (c) The project is located within an estuary or the Pacific Ocean. (d) The project involves stream channel relocation, other than temporary diversions approved by the Agency. (e) The project includes any structure, use or activity subject to another general authorization under OAR 141-089 or individual removal-fill permit under OAR 141- 085. Stat. Auth.: ORS 196.850 Stats. Implemented: ORS 196.800- 196.990; ORS 390.805-390.925 Hist.: DSL 6-2002, f. 11-25-02 cert. ef. 1-15-03 OAR 141-089-0180 Mandatory Requirements The Agency shall review each application to ensure that a project complies with the following mandatory standards: (1) If the project is within a State Scenic Waterway, a scenic waterway removal-fill permit must have been obtained from the Agency in accordance with OAR 141-100; and (2) A compensatory mitigation plan or compensatory wetland mitigation plan is required pursuant to OAR 141-085 to mitigate for any reasonably expected adverse impacts to water resources of the state or navigation, fishing and public recreation uses. Applicants for projects involving wetland impacts to areas less than 0.2 acres may use indirect compensatory wetland mitigation. Stat. Auth.: ORS 196.850 Stats. Implemented: ORS 196.800- 196.990; ORS 390.805-390.925 Hist.: DSL 6-2002, f. 11-25-02 cert. ef. 1-15-03 OAR 141-089-0185 Application Requirements; Public Notice; Review Process . (1) An application for a general authorization under this rule shall be submitted on an application fo�m available from the Agency. A complete application is one that contains all the information required in the application packet provided by the Agency including: A wetland delineation or determination approved in advance of the application by the Agency. (2) Within five (5) calendar days of receipt of the application, the Agency shall provide notice of the application to the local planning department, the local Soil and Water Conservation District, Department of Land Conservation and Development (if the project is in the coastal zone), affected Tribal government, State Historic Preservation Office, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service. If the project is on a fede�ally designated Wild and Scenic River, the Agency shall provide notice to the appropriate U.S. Forest Service or Bureau of Land Management office. � (3) The Agency shall consider comments received within twenty-one (21) calendar days of the notice date. In the event a party fails to r,omment within the twenty-one (21) cal�ndar day period, the Agency shall assume the party has no objection to the application. (4) The Agency may waive or shorten the review period described in (3) above upon a showing by the applicant in the application that the interested parties listed in (2) have previously reviewed and approved the project. (5) The Agency shall notify the applicant within twenty-one (21) calendar days of receipt of the application if the application is incomplete; otherwise the application will be considered complete. If the application is deemed incomplete, the Agency shall notify the applicant, return the application and identify the missing, inaccurate or insufficient information. (6) Following the twenty-one (21) day comment period set forth in (5) and not more than forty (40) calendar days from the receipt of a completed application, the Agency will determine if the project meets the eligibility requirements set out in this general authorization and do one of the following: (a) Approve the application and issue a letter of authorization to the applicant; (b)Approve the application and issue a letter of authorization, with project specific conditions, to the applicant; or . (c) Deny the application and notify the applicant. If the Agency determines that the proposed project is ineligible or otherwise does not qualify for the general authorization the applicant may submit the project for processing and review as an application for an individual removal-fill permit, as provided in OAR 141-085. (7) The Agency ry;ay re��:ire an individ�al removal-�i!! per,�ni� for projects t��at would otherwise be authorized by this general authorization, if the Agency determines that the activity might cause more than minimal individual or cumulative environmental impacts or might result in long-term harm to the water resources of the state. The Agency may also require an individual removal-fill permit if requested to do so by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality or the affected local land use planning department. Stat. Auth.: ORS 196.850 Stats. Implemented: ORS 196.800- 196.990; ORS 390.805- 390.925 Hist.: DSL 6-2002, f. 11-25-02 cert. ef. 1-15-03 OAR 141-089-0190 Conditions of Issuance of General Authorization All holders of a letter of authorization (authorization holder) shall adhere to the conditions of the general authorization. (1) The authorization holder shall conduct all work in compliance with the comprehensive plan, zoning requirements or other local, state, or federal regulations pertaining to the project. Local land use planning depa�tment approval shall be obtained if the project is located within a Federal Emergency Management Agency designated floodway. All other necessary approvals and permits shall be obtained before commencing with the authorized project. All necessary approvals and permits shall be obtained before commencing the project under this general authorization. (2) The authorization holder shall obtain all necessary access permits or rights-of-way prior to entering lands owned by another for the purposes of completing a project authorized under this general authorization. (3) The authorization holder shall conduct the activity during the time period recommended by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, unless after consultation with ODFW, a vra;v�r is gran.Ed by Rg�rcy for a long�r or altema�ive time period. (4) The authorization holder shall ensure that the activity will not interfere with fish passage, as required by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. (5) When listed species are present, the authorization holder shall comply with the state and Federal Endangered Species Acts. If previously unknown listed species are encountered during the project, the authorization holder shall contact the Agency as soon as possible. (6) The authorization holder shall not disturb or destroy known archeological sites unless authorized under a permit issued by the State Historic Preservation Office. When previously unknown occurrences of archeological sites are discovered during construction, the authorization holder shall immediately cease work at the discovery site and contact the Agency. � (7) The authorization holder shall ensure that the authorized work does not unreasonably interfere with or create a hazard to recreational navigation. (8) The authorization holder shall ensure that woody vegetation removal is limited to the minimum amount needed to complete the project including construction access and keying ' in of structures. (9) The authorization holder shall ensure that areas disturbed in the course of completing the authorized work are revegetated with the same mix of native herbs, shrubs and/or trees in approximately the same numeric proportion as were removed from the site, unless otherwise ap�iroved by the Agency, �;xcept thaf grass seed mixes of exotics certified free of noxious weeds that will hold the soil and not persist a�e permitted. (10) The authorization holder shall ensure that no petroleum products, chemicals or deleterious materials are allowed to enter the waters of the state. (11) The authorization holder shall assure that the work will not cause turbidity of affected waters to exceed 10% of natural background turbidity 100 feet downstream of the fill point. For projects proposed in areas with no discernible gradient break (gradient <2%), monitoring shall take place at 4 hour intervals and the turbidity standard may be exceeded for a maximum of one monitoring interval per 24 hour work period provided all practicable control measures have been implemented. This standard applies only to coastal lowlands and floodplains, valley bottoms and other low-lying and/or relatively flat land. For projects in hilly or mountainous areas, the turbidity standard can only be exceeded for a maximum of 2 hours (limited duration) provided all practicable erosion control measures have been implemented. These projects will also be subject to additional reporting requirements. Turbidity shall be monitored during active in-water work periods. Monitoring points shall be 100 feet upstream from the fill point at an undisturbed site (background), 100 feet � downstream, from the fill point and at the point of fill. A turbidimeter is recommended, however, visual gauging is acceptable. Turbidity that is visible over background is considered an exceedance of the standard. The authorization holder shall implement, as appropriate, all practicable erosion control measures including the following: (a) Prevent all construction materials and debris from entering waterway; (b) Use filter bags, sediment fences, sediment traps or catch basins, silt curtains, leave strips or berms, or other measures sufficient to prevent movement of soil; (c) Use impervious materials to cover stockpiles when unattended or during rain event; and (d) Erosion control measures shall be inspected and maintained periodically to ensure their continued effectiveness. (12) The authorization holder shall ensure that all structures are constructed using equipment operating outside the waterway or wetland unless otherwise approved by the Agency as a part of the project plan. (13) The authorization holder shall ensure that nonstructural approaches to bank stabilizat�or su�h as slope pul�-back, r;rillow mats, rock barbs, revegetation with Iocaii2ed native plant species, log and boulder deflectors, are utilized unless otherwise approved by Agency. Where, riprap and/or other structural techniques are unavoidable, they shall be used in combination with nonstructural approaches. Where riprap is used, the toe material shall be placed in an irregular pattern using large boulders or rock clusters. Only clean, durable rock shall be used as riprap. No concrete or asphalt sha(I be used. (14) In the case of road removal, the authorization holder shall ensure that all affected � stream and bank areas are restored to their approximate original contour. (15) The authorization holder shall keep a copy of the letter of authorization available at the work site whenever the activity is being conducted. (16) Employees of the Agency and all duly authorized representatives shall be permitted access to the project area at all reasonable times for the purpose of inspecting work performed under this authorization. (17) The Agency makes no representation regarding the quality or adequacy of the project design, materials, construction, or maintenance, except to approve the projecYs design and materials as satisfying the resource protection, scenic, safety, recreation, and public access requirements of ORS Chapters 196 and related administrative rules. (18) The State of Oregon, and its officers, agents, and employees shall be held harmless from any claim, suit, or action for property damage or personal injury or death arising out of the desigr�, mater:a(, constri:ction, or mainte�ance of th� permitted improvements. (19) The Agency may add other project-specific conditions to the letter of authorization as necessary to meet the requirements of the general authorization. Such additional conditions may be needed to ensure that the project will cause only minimal individual and cumulative environmental impacts and will not result in long term harm to water resources of the state. (20) The Agency may, at any time, by notice to affected authorization holders revoke or modify any letter of authorization granted under this general authorization if it determines the conditions of the general authorization are insufficient to minimize individual or cumulative environmental impacts. (21) The authorization holder is responsible for the activities of all contractors or other operators involved in project work covered by the letter of authorization. Stat. Auth.: ORS 196.850 Stats. Implemented: ORS 196.800- 196.990; ORS 390.805-390.925 Hist.: DSL 6-2002, f. 11-25-02 cert. ef. 1-15-03 OAR 141-089-0195 Violation of General Authorization; Enforcement Violations of the terms and conditions of any general authorization are subject to administrative and/or legal action which may result in revocation of the authorization. The authorization holder is responsible for the activities of all contractors or other operators involved in work done at the site or under the authorization. Stat. Auth.: ORS 196.850 Stats. Implemented: ORS 196.800- 196.990; ORS 390.805-390.925 Hist.: DSL 6-2002,f. 11-25-02 cert. ef. 1-15-03 OAR 141-089-0200 Appeals; Expiration; Review of General Authorization (1) A person whose application for the genera( authorization is determined by the Agency to be ineligible or otherwise not qualified for this general authorization may obtain an informal review of the Agency's decision through the alternative dispute resolution process resolution process described in OAR 141-085-0075. However, tliis is only opportunity to review the Agency's decision and does not give the person a right to a contested case hearing. (2) This general authorization shall be reviewed by the Agency on or before January 1, 2006, at which time it shall be modified, reissued or rescinded. The review will include public notice and opportunity for public informational hearing.. Stat. Auth.: ORS 196.850 Stats. Implemented: ORS 196.800- 196.990; ORS 390.805-390.925 Hist.: DSL 6-2002,f. 11-25-02 cert. ef. 1-15-03 . MEMORANDUM � � - TO: Brad Kilby FROM: Greg Berry 9�� SUBJECT: SLR 2003-9 for water outFall within the Fanno Creek Floodway for Hall Blvd. improvements DATE: August 20, 2003 Attached is the Corps permit that should have been attached to the August 20th memo. � , . - DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ��•,�� PORTLAND DISTRICT,CORPS OF ENGINEERS �� .i�'��-�, � [� �� '�� ' ' E�� i POST OFFICE BOX 2946 '�, �� PORTLAND,OREGON 97208-2946 ��{,� �� \�,_�� l! �� . ;��r.;�: ..`•... ` L , . �.-� REPLV TO July 22, ZOO_7 ATTENTION OF: . Operations Division t;l t ! Ur. � f U�� Regulatory Branch Corps No.: 200300241 Ms. Vannie T. Nguyen City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Ms. Nguyen: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) has received your permit application requesting Department of the Army (DA) authorization to install a sanitary sewer line and stormwater outfall in wetlands adjacent to Pinebrook Creek; extend a culvert on Pinebrook Creek; and install a geotechnical fabric on the bank of Fanno Creek, as shown in the enclosed drawings (Enclosure 1). The project is located east of SW Hall Boulevard, in Section 1 of Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Tigard, Washington County, Oregon. Your project involves work at three different locations within the project site as described below: Site 1. Installation of a sanitary sewer line and stormwater outfall riprap pad, as shown on Figures 3-6. The trench for the sanitary sewer line will impact 87 linear feet of wetland. The trench will be 2 feet wide with a construction easement of 40 feet. Installation of a stormwater outfall will involve placement of a 10-foot by 10-foot riprap pad with a construction easement of 40 feet. Total temporary impacts will affect 0.11 acre of wetland. Total permanent impacts will affect 0.002 acre of wetland. Except for the riprap pad, all impacted areas will be returned to pre-construction contours and planted with native vegetation. Site 2. Addition of a turn lane on SW Hall Boulevard will require the extension of an existing 24-inch-diameter culvert, as shown on Figures 12-14 of Enclosure 1. An existing 62- foot-long, 18-inch-diameter culvert that is currently outside of thc existing road prism will be removed and replaced with a 51-foot-long, 24-inch-diameter culvert. Approximately 15 feet of channel will be graded and restored to an open channel. Site 3. Placement of 22 linear feet of geotechnical fabric from the top of bank to the toe of the bank of Fanno Creek, as shown on Figures 15 and 16 of Enclosure 1. A 20-foot-long header with ten 6-inch-diameter pipes will disperse water from [he stormwater bioswale located -2- approximately 100 feet from the top of bank. The geotechnical blanket is needed to ensure adequate armoring of the bank for discharge events. Blackberries will be removed from the bank, the geotechnical material p]aced, and native herbaceous seed mix and willow stakes planted on the blanket. Since this portion of the project does not involve a discharge of fill material in wetlands or below the line of ordinary high water, a separate DA permit is not required. This letter verifies that your project is authorized under the terms and limitations of Nationwide Permit Nos. 12 (utility line activities), 14 (linear transportation projects), and 43 (stormwater management facilities). Your activities must be conducted in accordance with the conditions found in the Regional Conditions (Enclosure 2), General Conditions (Enclosure 3), and the following project specific conditions: a. Clay plugs shall be installed at both ends of the trench within the wetland boundaries to ensure that the wetland hydrology is not altered by installation of the sanitary sewer line. b. To compensate for temporary and permanent impacts, you shall complete the restoration work as shown on Figures 7-11 of Enclosure 1 and detailed in the Mitigation Special Conditions (Enclosure 4). The Oregon Department of Environmental Quality has provided their Section 401 water quality certification (WQC) for Nationwide Permit Nos. 12 and 14. The WQC contains conditions (Enclosure 5) that you must comply with as part of your Department of the Army authorization. Water quality certification has not been issued for Nation�vide Permit No. 43. Therefore, authorization for construction of the stormwater outfall in the wetland adjacent to Pinebrook Creek will not become valid until certification is issued. By copy of this letter, we are notifying DEQ of your proposed work and thus requesting their certification. The certification will be considered by Mr. Tom Melville, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, 811 SW Sixth Avenue, Portland Oregon, 97204-5694. When water quality certification has been issued, you must provide this office a copy, along with the conditions of their certification. The conditions of the 401 certification are conditions of this authorization. Your activities must be conducted in accordance with those conditions as well as those conditions enclosed with this letter. Your failure ro ensure compliance with any of the listed conditions could result in the Corps initiating an enforcement action. We also direct your attention to Regional Condition 1, (Enclosure 2), that requires the transfer of this permit if ihe property is sold and General Condition 14 that requires you to submit a signed certificate when the work is completed. A "Compliance Certification" is provided (Enclosures 6). . -3- Failure to comply with any of the listed conditions could result in the Corps initiating an enforcement action. This authorization does not obviate the need to obtain other permits where required. Permits, such as those required from the Oregon Division of State Lands (ODSL) under Oregon's Remova] /Fil) Law, must also be obtained before work begins. This verification is valid for a period of 2 years from the date of this letter unless the nationwide permit expires, is modified, reissued, or revoked prior to that date. All the nationwide permits are scheduled to be modified, reissued or revoked in March 2007. If you commence or are under contract to commence this activity before the date the nationwide permit expires, is modified or revoked, you will have twclve months from the date of the modification or revocation to complete the activity under the present terms and conditions of the current nationwide pertnit. If you have any questions regarding this nationwide permit verification, please contact Ms. Kathryn L. Harris at the letterhead address or telephone (503) 808-4387. ,Srr�cerely, �� % , `� , :, �� ; � �.,� L/ L x4rence C. van� s V ` hief, Regulatory Branch Enclosures � I ,� Copy Furnished: Oregon Division of State Lands (Colin MacLaren - DSL No: 30238-RF) Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (Melville) � � c ��. __ . .--- .._ _._._.-I ; .- - • , -- I i�,\ :� � .. •.�� i.� • ►� � ��—�,,�-- ---_._.__. . __ .. __._ .--�------� .. _ 1 � ,, ' 1 r T � ` , � I , - �n � . � '1 �i ; � � , • �� c:.. ', � , ! �� . ,�,: . � ,. f,?i ........ . �•o�.� ��: • I�.,e,_..__ . , � - — •�'�' .ti .y o.. : 1 . yl ::..";::. . ........��{�''. . . l. . 1� .� , i�d � Q O , ,�� "4, 1 ,f,_.___ ��', .�, _ ._ _ --.. _ hvtn��• -- � m� ..r � — C O . i �,� y�v�' _ o O �:1'�).L`�\LI h'``�l _ ' 3 .i - =� � � ' � . r � ,11iIS�' o' •� � ! , , ,, � ' •I%�,..�" .- • '{-•�,3 . Qp � . `� ; ' i � �� .y . n.0 _ � .. ' .. , ��. ♦\ ��I.`r�3 S.. .�' X(1 II , ` ' I � 1��'I+ I. �- ,�� -I�.Z��« .�/ L � � �i. -3 ,., � � -�eml V � ,. �n'�� o ' �I , ' r I '� '' �,�' ��n��. . �.�'�,� � , � . � e I . . .._: � "�"�� 0�.�.. ,� � 1� y` :�'� . ..�� • � • '1 � �a,�": ' .w�� . I �� , F.. � � :ti� i �•I.�� ;i. . � � ^� r � � w ! �..J� ��.�' , , 'ii ��. Ii•. .�' � . � �5� �n,', u�/� •� � .� �� — (� V !' I I',�� c� •A �� • ♦ ,.1 �. �y'. ��:; r�L k. .. , _.•'T i�� t.�W' ,_ ' (n _�-- .�, , , � '�; -J �� -`� _ � I w , _ � ,�!:. g�,� � �,n �i i�_� } ss, a `' �� t � ` ✓ .�` ' .� I � ' `i �f ' _..I �. +�: l •� �••S,. � l � � . � � � � �,� l .I ;i� �t � �� 1 (+'� I /,� n. �A�� ., r;_ ''��r �'• � . .i. ,r _ �4e! � �' �.j„'•�. �.� %'1 �.. � !"L�1; y� , � . �i. � �� ...� �r �.4 i_/ `F1 � ,l' ... S ' `� G��} ,., � . . , . . . a � � � / {� . j � . . ... : ��..� �t� �G� i� I�J i� � �ir ' � � � II �w, ��y:�, ( � , .' i y r .c. r��n, _ ,f/�G � 1�i f'�'��` -�; . . �,<� , i�..il � . I, g�. :` II7 N �t� ,l�l I!, s1 °#�:i' \` ;'/ .�1�1 l j I�i� , + 4 �ia � � , d � � 4 t ` .�. /\�yl►� a;�y�, : ` � ��,v l � I i ��' 2 �i Y � •..I '�I�' �i. .ii !MSL �' ��•� z �� .l� fld • ��j.I,4�'i�'• ��(`;` ,1� �.l:.j -:�.'l ';-;. � ..i I. V ' i� ' ;�: I, -�,L .'`, ,g n„•;• � ,(��ii/a,y � ' . � .c• u� � t. :;� � � , :., i . .�� - ,. ,� _ :� -�: �• ♦ �'ii; �r�� ;i�t � ;5.: �!'� ... �J � � f,; li }� L. . .. . � .� .1��•��` �� .� i. ��. I 1.. ,. . .. '! :H,� ... � . .. I�:��\:. '�. . . . . " � . ' ' y � . . C�. ' . i 1 .. �I •/ 1 ^ l�_` Y�,I.' �:.�`,��.•:�'� �.I ..._.J�:..'. '-' �•..J� �. j '� I��,� � � I / . _ ' � ��{7 �,r�i�`��> ��, ij"��' ,) ti ,.��,. i . �0�„�"��- � .'l 'I._ � �i.�i I Ip � /�c� n ''�' ( .( " J � ' � i-f (' ' ` �� :'��i C7i r�• p �I! T. J i i �.\`,� ��,lii I ��. ... . } J�� .O/,/�� I t . . \�A , .o' . �. ` .'�� 'r: f '•� � � I ? � •� •1 + , ;�t' a� - _ � ' ' I �->'' `' �� ;,.�1 .:l :I i c �: . ; •'''� t' !'� � , G, f.� ��„ �- I . '� , I � J � , � �, .,y� ,c .,f- � � _ r l/i ._.� r , � J ,,`�'?��`�/y \Js �,( 3�. i°� 1 � ' �,� �� .�• :'_{t.J`�..�, r }. . ��. `�`. �� 1�� V , • �I`�n � , YI ��;9` 11 I � �1 I � ��(��5� �..��;/ a�� . .�l 4' t' r �,�\I� , ` p � i •� J � � �,�ry .��,�'1 � ��;ti.� Tr�� i,ql' ,{: `� ��_� �� .. �' � + � j'; ': .a�� :�� M�ti'/� '.w�� , : � (�J ti+ � ./ b; iti�t�.', . 9 . . /� � , ,� . �r b.� � � ! . � .�� . I.. \�� ... ' . - � . ' 4 � �" ' ��. ' ��` c r/• 4 ��/�` . l� � .(. �i/'� I ,ti.. �y � i �g� . �Y'� . �_, `✓0 ��r `` 1 •�t : '�r "��` ` t �' i', �� r�'•�a, . i "i [t '€- � � � �1 � ..''• �� , i ' � �0':�,ti ' � ;� t-. i r� -� .'I i..�� •Y„ v-� 3 6i� _.i� rr .�. ..� \ r T •�� \ ' {y�; 1 , ,�. y.. . .s� ��.;G�.�y � �t ��I�I�� . . .' �i�� f.' i � j,�1 � ; T Y �� il _ `� '� i� � i � i�i. .�f �i i � 'i s. .� tk� t � . . .� � . � • �} L . ' � ! ' . . ` � , , . . ?�` � •. �� [�. � � �1 t : � r �I1� �� ''• � i ., - - ._ __' .. . : � : .'1�.�. . �'__� i_._._ ._' .•-5 _.�.:o �9_.�..._ •.� � ��•JPt flf r � t �� .j ,,f�:.� , I�� g r� �1 Y ___' —.� ' "_ '.' '"'_ ".___.....d �.... . u Y'�S� x., . , i � i _�_ -�._ �1��, .:. � . �i � � e �� - :. �� ' gS�.'�r�� C��':a'.. I �?" �!:i'1L: � � ;_\� I/. . .. : � _ . � � __ � it°P'1 ` j l' , '"'�1'J`�- J • 1`.��- � Q� �;C:J:k .� � ,fiV�/@ • '.`.://....r 1�0'r\� ! �'.v�_.�•co•t, kI J�'Y, "_ Q� •(�` .�.��'Y� �jG%f�J.iY��'� � \I' ; .1,, ��,.. ._ . . .�.�1�,, . I I � ��:� , ; � ; _--- �,,,,� ��,::: :. .--� � � _ � .�� . � . �_ _ '_' . � ; � ; ~�. �.�: ,•,�~ .�!„ IN _ I ,� I. . . I. . _ . . ' . . �.�. �I j! I � —..�_ \:: —�-. .'4 i � � � 1 l_ ' . «� • _ • _ • _ •_• i •' . � _ � / �� ` ��••... , , J � . .I _• • - ��.'.i. '. '� ' . ' / . , � — — ��•L I T� . .�. . . . ./%. ._ ./ . ..�. .. .� ' '� � :so s� - wnra ou�in «cN m_—_ 1��j* � - � . �% . �. � �� . / ' r • out,at� Mmcenor+ uz� - r � � 1- � .J ' 'J_.- • � ?` � I�` '- : j �- -::�::� : c :- � - r. . -_:= -�= �., % � -=� - __ �- .�y��'� �'� ', l '�. � - _ � . ��. ' :. ' . � . :I ° _ —_ _ _ — — -. �::��;:.r' �� r . i I � � - '., , � • - � . .%. . . . . �. � , y4� � �� 1� _ �� ) #�� . . , � ' . ' •�.�_ �_�.'. . . - ��, � 7� r • \ ` �� r `\ . .� .! . �. . . � . . � '� I� — ' • _ 111 � /1 `, / I '� • '. '. '_% _ '.-_-, :,. : /. 'i: .�' �1 � • • � 1 �� , � � '�' .�_—'., . . ,\'� '� .�• .�: � '� ' ' .' � � (/ � � -� • �' ' `' .�� . — '' �� = � f �/ / '� .� �r ��/ • � / . - -- �. 1 �� • \ � � � /- /< � • � `�/,i''/'��/ �, , � � I1 1 ��7" •� �� •�� _ ' ` I, �/1•\•y• •�y�lLLCY7 P: . 1 1 �\�� > .� �� '.+-. ' U��" t � /� • •�(��1• �� / BJ[NQK41 i�` � n �. • /,��•: � � 1 -� . � �-�, , �,� . � ° � � ��:�_.•.r. � $�� . �' :-.�-' - Op � '� f.•./j � � � ��i�tF-+� � �- - � � %- � �/•'•;� i . II� � � — � � I I I � � / �i,.�� .i�rcw c!�e / i � � , 1 � I/ `/ `; /Q /% /-f:�• .�. .r.\ i � � - � o � •�•'•1•:•� •� �, � , f �_ ; _.LI_ I� �� ' °�.'. , �'_ :►: ��' '' :� ii i r -�.��-�-� -.-:: - �• _ . �.T-�� , f - . � :�. ,` --�:�- :- . . :�:= �1.=:.-w..-:�.:i-.�:�.�- ��x-" � -�� • .�• '� , � . - � . �.. .- . . ��.�: �, ,i � � S � _ � ��•:-�- - :�.p... .:�}:1��-f.� N �`-� � r ' f - � '�#� .�: :, � ' � � _ � ., 'f:�'�{:-/J�_ .�� j .�.�:�f.: �:-. �;;- � � �. . -�3�: ' '• •: � �= ` _K.�: .�.�: -.`-�:1: .�o_->'�.-�� / , :} ,r.� ,�• ;&�'� � 'r -; i � � � I � � � � - � • � �� , , -. i i i. r � r , : ;�=:�`:�: . � --i �, � i � , \ � _-� •-�1,.��F�,-:�;�; , : , ,I � � ( ,-- ��• �, \ I I I _ I I I � � rc7.�nav •� �.�, -(7.�"1� '% � \\ � ` _ r f i :�;, � �,•. .� 1 ., . .• . . , . , - . _, . � �-r-� - , —.. . � � I � -�, � .�:� . r �. � i: i j.4; .;. � f�'� , / �� • • I "'_^J.`"..�:`. ��•• •�J .1�. 1 ��-, �-. - 1 r - � -��,-� � . . , ,� f -�� 'Ij,• �.i' ' - Y ',,; -. "G.: - I. ;F4�*'�; .+.�.i � � ;. � r :• , _� = . i.�- -- . ��f'�:�'� '�-�� :� :� .� ''• : r , , � � ;:� � ,. , 1' ..-�. ��-�r��•,� . . J�: ��:� =`•,• ✓sia . '}' .� i ��/f'� 7� j : •��.'�.'.`y 'Se'ly',:�5"i�•Y�.J� .'1'�'.r��.-. .� `'�. .�'�'� /� '\ � i, %.�� i� %. / � / • �'- � -�. ';"y!�"`��y,..: Ic. .?. ...�.`' •:� l,:F•./,`j )�/ / � I; ` . f. .. � � � �. . /. ��I�(�'R"%'"_3d��l�� C,r✓� �.�i�J � �`�� • /- / � � ��'�/: ' '�'�'. :. ' �•% � � � � '�� \ . �, ' /- �:'.1.�,�'.' ' '� •�1 Y� -c I , —. __ , •� ,�, / / � � �� i� I( ' _7 -- � � ' '''�-- ' _. ` / - h� \ -- �'+�k � � . '.yr��a-'r-�:�3�'' � .�`: . �a-h��;,�,f-��' � 11 ) / / '�!� � •� •'`�j�1�'�� r_r--'`��G,j/-� ( Mm@ts+ol�ut�.a \��-��— I � I,� � � \ ,�.� �.�.�• ;C : _o:r:5�—�� ., � (' ,F„cF-. � ��. �`: - � /i� ` �/ �-��'�'\• '•,��2'�xztff � 'i.'�\ �\ � ' i.ai v�x+rR+c�vs�s. ��"....tvr ti�. --`- ��If I , - � �� --��,a�.� � I � _- /-iL J �__�a `��\ �i�"�m ad;�s��..:o-,�,�'��.��\.\_ ` �u�::,ux,°ssro�. � �I��,' y� � j� � `` \ --/–�/ �(/ �� \\��u.vbwn,:'nnc�s sw:iit:tc�r / 1 / / � —��7,y—i� �� —+�•\��\ � \. N ut1Fp1 AS PfR S�Cp�1CA7Ya.5 — _l �1 // /"'S=0 '1��,�. \��1\ir ��-tD co�� o,�� a��.n�siv��ec►rsr�.:in n+ • � �� l G�TAS/N s�a-r..�nx� �y g � _�'+E; �^� Vv � � � �'1 o��u'�J L�u�P�P� ° �u�C� pO�W �°°�f�°��p � —______—_ �F �. -Ti"M'v Q �� D'U� �<<l� �n�� - --- �t:?;�� Y • ' �? ZM ? g [e n.`�-. T '� ,. ✓'G Z , , _ - - � E ; ` /� :r�� = i ; 51�.� �'\`, u>. -' _ -' I � — 1 � %' 1OJ '°�- \ � .` !� _ - - � _ - _ j '6'� i ) (��'� �� [�� , _ ii_ - = � � �, �� i � � 1 J yu,s��o r�,!,� / ^/ , i � f[COD P�ii� � ' — -. , - . I — - � 9�UNDARy � � �z ( / � _ i�-i�� , t � �� _ --��, _ ��i�� = � pP o� ,�-�— - I � -" _ �' j��' :' \/ � I j'° 1 J�' l�� `r� �� - `� \/ � � ^ . f _ _ ��_. �S, �� /�'��' � . � �-__ _ µ / _ r r' — y \�� \ I ' _ ti — J� rtC- i �- ��;� �/ ' - - - . r�: � � � � � 1 ��R _ ;�-�=--- i�' � - - \ � _ �= � � ,I � _ . ' � � i -�-- --- - �_ `�- �_ � !�_ i l: �_ _B��m -- -- -- - I � - , N n � � I �.� / \ \ �. �,, ; \ ' t �, 5: 1 GRADING IN BUFFER �' �� J� jI' ; '�� '� � �� NO TREES REMOVED . ' i . �� ' � � ----- __._f� �� J FR�P S�D�� ' �� . _--- - � . ',43'' ;�= STOR � .�' � � \j�� -\ �__ -y��'� �� .V� � � � � � � �� _ � �� l�rn.:'_ , �' - r �; � � --.�,. _ � � �� i ,� � � '� Cree ' ,�,JPROP SE ' L / ' � STORti� CU-TF�LL - K SANIT R�Y �v /` �f�T� SUFFER AND� ° ` �-- . — — - — — -- � � � '� �WET��AI�D� ; 1�� / � _ , ivE�LfjNO/� � �. , ... � . � -— � �� ' . � � % �� 6�/✓DARY� � - � ..9�c-�_.-�__-�� / �� '�, Be�m .,r j/ � _ �� j \ , C;r��,k. ��% ,,.%ii ,./j, j `\ /, � . � / , �� ]C UTC��j' �'z . � �'. : / / �% . � / � �� ` .i �f' � __ , /� ;� , , , :\ � — i_ ��,/ � � � - -� �:� � � �%,/; /�. /,. � %'. ,'i� �%" ; ;' _ _ _ _ — - - / ;' . _ _ _ , , , � \ Berm _ ` � � \ % :'(� - - _ -� . . // /// /�N __-_ _ _ �_ ...s('� e?�_.� _ ,' - . .i �. j�� . � �.. ,� � - -. . � - - - A � � � : � , - - . ._._c�� _ /-,,\ / �,i ; � - -oOr•� \-- _ - "•�,; -- -- � ';_� - �`� . . .. . .��•�S' \ �� xu��xasxl �6r��r�c� (�obPa�y p0�w ti�oQ�U�� i�J��O�wc� U�pac�� •. �SSOCIATES. INC. 9= . ��, `'� �r�6��«nnc • Kale: Resour<n — --- — —___—_—_' (� i..ecapc Arc9iteaure . Flenniag ._---_— — —_�_____—______ .____________.__.—______ c�� nmrntal . Sun•ceing ^� ( -`.F:: cM Jxr �Ircet. Suil< 200 i��il�C�l�J �•�� ,I�7� �'��1�.� • rtcn. OrrEcn 9;006 .. ..:G'fiE:-' . . �503jb9;-9�71 'Z�� l'L9, + • • � -- - - " , - _ ,✓j!� i _ _ II / ---L�_Cl I - I�i�/['/ 1 � _ " - _ - - ' � I - `° `�' � �i i ,� v�l7� ';; i `�?�G"L OC�T � ^ j I � i 1 `\ �\ IL��C �'� ','�� „ ��1 -� � �� , --_ -- — ��„ ;��"'';�z��.-._ _�� i � /l l�- -+�� s Berrr�-. � �� -- ��a = � - � � � -�-`_-`. � � _ � �z � ��, �� _,-- ,� �JG Sr��'.UCS \ I I f I � J / �`�� • � I r ' � � 5: � GRADIP s,, 4�;lcs� � � % , � 'Ii:L lA/l�JlV '� � ( I �I J �� \� �' � � � � I I � � / l , �� .�1 NO TREES ,s = --y , A ,, I_� �� I I � I PR P S�D�I , ` �� _ � _ i , � � ��` � �`. '� � - -�--_ - . /, ' ;. TOR �� ' .'�.`.� �\��- — ; � I '_�' , -�_ , • - ;- � � �s� � �� j , ;� � �I � STORM CUTFALL 1 �� „ROP SE �ANIT �Y y % 9 � � r�'- j� ' INTO BUFFER AND \`'�° � � -- _- - - — � -; i. /. WE TL A N D wErcAN� 1,\ ` 1 � ; BouNO�,�r-�� 1 , ; _-��/ 3 , :�� - �` � �..�-� J ' _ —�" � � , - _ A BE'Tl � �-� -� �{ � ,, _ ,,\ 1 �.,, � ; ,�'�,��to�� ; � � �; .; - _ — - � ��--� � � . _ _ , ; _ , ; ; � ____ - // �-�_ _ _--- _�_ ( —_ N �__�� , .."__.�. �� . � . __J/�%/ / � \"' ��.�� . ' Ber.m _. � -- --��- _ � �� `\ _ \ \`\` ��2��u ,-\ _ ---� , -- ,_�, �., � ; --- --- � __-- - `'a LOCuSi ( / '�. ��,� \ �� _- ___--- __ — ' �— -�_�'��__ '�� ,. --, � � �� =' 7� , !' , ��' \ 'J\J�� \\ `\�� \\ '� \\ / 1 `�ti=��.'\ '� �.\ _ � .. � . . �� .. -.�\ �.�, \ � '�\ �'\ \ %, �%r'y�C�'S� �`�� '�- � �� \ � � i� � \` '� \\� �� . ' � ( / � �`\/v-� � ,\ ` .. • � ,\ \ � \ . . , I. �. ��? ,`�J••1 r��! _�. • \ � , `� .._ .. . . _�_'J ._ ,.�5,'' . . . . . . . . � �� 1� �O�O c��.Pd L�0(�Pc��.P� ��:�a�� K URAHASHI l��i 11i pOf�r�� ra`l..W�� p�PG`�iU �W�W� U�i��ca`l.�ld ��i�pc��.�� ' : ��. Cn:l �oqiner.ing • Kxter P.erources — --r -- -.---,— -- —-- ---- — -- _- _ -- �r�'�� Lands<epr trc�ilm!urt . Plxmm�� —��-��---- -�—��----�--��- ovircnm<ntal • Sar.�epin� �� :s;EO �. ��, �i.«i. so�i� ?o0 1��f� �ti� JS cl 1.73 =ea c-lon. (1,-c fi006 8 7 SC3i6i:-fi8<2 .u� (503)6; -5:31 ;�'7'�, ") � � '�o �or a� eou.�i c�scErs r . � ,a � _�,>,._ �� _ . �� B' I.EGALUG RETAINER � •� � ,a�j � (�+r+D (EBnA iR9r+) '/� � J°A/E'.cF . ��W:', ...OWCRfTE RFS , . . gip� 0' GYE V4LV' jSeEGEi�c;:�.; �LC. .u.1 StDEWALK WI7N PLANTER T o' u.1 y 6' fl6 TEE -'"A Fti? � STRIP AT CtIRB � � - �:_: � $��1MA V( �unz.�'K n^"c� NOTE f 1. N�'9Ran'�5 TU BE MODERN MUEIIFR CiNTVWO(. ��u2.(OR AVP'0 EOUAC) 6' u1 5 1/�' 17V0 3 PORi-- T�9 2 1/7 PE1+7AOON MERATION NUT. OPEN LFF7 N�TH TIiE fOILOW�N2 �l Ol R�S£32V062 ,•• B. �iONZE ACIL�TON NllT H• S�Z MAPTD4 C- EfiONZE SEAT RiN6 A D. WFI�TNEH S-�ElD CAP C SNFETY 3.EEYE COUPUNC f. 7liRE�OED N�ES MIT{'0'RINGS 4 NATONAL ST/WDlAO THqEAD$ .�LiFD. 2 S�ETY (�IAWS TO BE REMOVED. 3. H7DRANTS TO BE PNtt7ED USfW R-IS17.".HFLfY Yf110W OR AN l�ITERNA7E �PL+ildvfD BY dSTftICT FlR£ MAR91A�y„ 4. HYDRANT 10 9E IMSTNt1.fD 7RVE N/D PLV3AB. 5. ND 083ii7UCnOHS Mnicl S' 0'RApIV$pF H7Di�1�T. 6. IF SU8_EC7 7p yE}{11�E DA4AGEp, PROTECTIVE PO$7 lp Bf PRpV�p�0. 7. V�11'E BOZ 70 BE 1N ACCORDMI�YATH STANDARp ORAWViO NQ 3p3 pR AS AAPRDYED � unfffed BY E7/pNFIR, � sewetage �- TM'h'ST�-�s sHnu Har ee ouc�o AT H�RANT L��T1diS ��Y �.,,�.. �o� °�`��,��'°" � FIRE HY4RAN7 o.arc a,,.�,,,� ��x� .,�„ �etY g42 O �� C�ASS "B" CLASS "A" ,, o usr uca+ e,o syvncr rt�1w�Ta�+ M«nm occtt�w�mc� •E BoM inv AS Sn'EC/FlID WQe ts�afll TO FQi SCT�Ii �:CY•� P�WCID 7EC ` �.k�C-��' • .- �It/ / ':y�l f: � t5�i" ( Fsr- au srEEl MrE sw�T • • 7EE :C1fJ S1EF1 ROD ' ' • • � •". �UNbSTWeOLD •.-.� � �tA1qSR/RLCD wnn [^+�Tr1 �� _Z Nwm.E �,rtn�-� umu� tia.ta� J/�'-o O+ua+�'p �•'T�+K�^ JdC£ pOpF� \' �L�. C� :C, ' (BFAI! • FlT1UK' u�rm�/OU4E��ERpLt1L � ��.'i.' 97E(��Cl�S) 5 3 a" - fl Q7VTD7 TD \ � ',\•�l�'�T a 'oi`1E upr.'O�.Ni �� "�_"` e ��CQ1I3i Nt1Lm �,,✓:•�7_;• • • • � 0 �T J/�'-O RN�� :"1•,�. - 12 RpQ . ;r'.' ' �_ ' t/2 PIPE O.D. �6 �+c m� - �us e- f '� u 4 V1C �.�f. `�' • - ��-.. '1 � � � ?.� wBWE BEw[oNC u 4_ '!D e. �• •90' �� hLLUV�q,[5O� F� � ��o 0 0 .;$�i 'p°o' ca�,c e�..a�u: q,'p�j:�04 0 0 � STES�.S'tc�Tut� , amotia °�'6" t � •� e o � .8 KNBq N¢.tT- rc�. D o NO�LSc / 1. '_'TRAOO/F a.{ / SiE DETA4 ffJ z Cri�C�E n+M a r�v c�+ca�r �/2�YE O.U. P�119 4�NYl FOR PIPE BAAI.lEA MAN 16� t ME RfafiREL �/2 CvE O.A PW3 O' riK r�ee awe�6'�wo uricESr [NOtttm a+ ARfA REOV��7 . '� F NOT 91OfrN wdU�ED�bc �1S) i 3'CCS�1�`HO'.^. 0. DE�NC AF£t` Pit�',1DDKE l� �^-57u�m<r.� No aa�L RZ2 � "uT �� TRENCH BACKFILL � � unifled �oN d.m.o�.,�. 505 DE7AILS � sev,re� pq�� }e vn v iMO ��Y-°• ..7.80 - �l /'i 1/ ��' � i � . . ._ . � _�_..r �� _.-__..�_..__��_--°---._��.�_..�_...... ,.�. . 1 . _�_� • ��E ,ND �;Rr=A �----- _- ---- � �;!�T'J?�ED �,RE�=, T�� E P,EVEGITAi ED TOP GF BERh � 31' 6" OF RIP RAP EXISTING GP,OUND OVER PIPE INLET 10' X 10' �—ii— , CLASS 50 RIP RAP -i I I-I I I-I I 1=1 I l=1 I-i�-_ LIVE STAKE PLANTtNG . -1 I I_I I-1 I i-1 I I-1 I i-1 I I-1 I I-1 I 1,-i i,_,,,,_,_, f 2' O.C., nP. � CREEK �-IE=139.75 12" PVC IE=138.00 ��ore��r�t�� ta��I C�oaa �eC��on WETLAND AREA 6" OF RIP RAP OVER PIPE LIVE STAKE PLANTING 2' O.C., TYP. 10' X 10' � CLASS 50 RIP RAP ;I I I-i__ � ' — � � '� ORIGINAL GROUND 1�' „ 1,00 � NOTE: 12 PVC PLANT CORNUS SERICEA (REDTWIG DOGWOOD) AT IE= 138.00 2' O.C. �TYP. �N RIP RAP OUTFALL ��Pf'4'��'E�$�i' �f��Q�I �� '� 5ce�� KURAHASHI ��oren��r ��'! - ��I ��re�� Pa�� sr assocu�s, Lrrc. a.0 au�<� . r.�r��„�, Fd.�.S. �e,�-��.�a,��. • p�,i - SFi`�a 7 m.��w . sw�� B��:�`��;�,� Z� G�.�a�c�b 9�➢ �OOo�3 (.`�03)64f-8.,°S2� !n� (5�3�4{-C7Jl FB�.� - . ''`�,� - -. ° .. - - � r� . � � � � . � , _; _ . � - ` ,,'� _ � „ � , .,: , . , � .:. , r � , - _ , ,' .. , �1�, � a�`� ,� � �;' ✓�� r<irttnl�AS ; .. , � � � � �� , �.�L J � �„ . _`,�E i. . , . � . , . ; - --- . , . •� �'j � _' — ' � � ROOT WAD—(4 1�01-AI_ � ��r"�:�: ,,. , - � , ; , _. , • ' _ �.� '�\ � �' � ��, � ° � ' v✓ ��, ' . f �� ' '� °� � .�, ,.�. . - . '= ,/��,_. � �� - , , , ., < , � , , �.. . ' . . i�� `�� . , \: ::,.. � � � j] I' Q�; � � _� 6_ ` J � � \ .. � �j/ i `� � `�t� __ �— TRIl3UTA�-�Y ;� � - � l�/� , � � �'�, CREEK , (3)� CRDO l f�) QUG,�' \; ,,�.,, �3) QUG/� -,\ (2) ALf�U ��; :` (240),'CAOB '� 't �.\ '��. c� (i) SASI ----� � �� `��. �2.40� �CMI \ � , '— .r ROOTW�D �YP. \ � °' � r - "��3) SASI � \ 1 -- �.-, � � � _ � ��5� - -�- � I�� ` �', �. / �- �.� --, (450) C AOB �'� �� i��E31,,I�M; � P`� �v ,- _, � � �' --- � 4 50 S C M I , �.� ��`�- c_,� ',r-.F ('3) ALRU � - - - - ��, _ _ � ) �� ;� - -,,. , _ __- \\�, �X �-(3) A L R U ',I , � r., �r-�. — . . - i fr�C r 'n� - - �� , y i / , • I J I _ . _ . � ;;; • 1 � I � ;"� -_ _ - �"� �' � - � � , 1— ; -i� � = — — �'� _ �r — ._ , �: . o � ��.� . _ _ _ =� , — — - = �.� — . ._ :_ — , — ' : �, , . . `�c � { ' u -__= BERIv1 � T �` ' % ;�- I( . �, - _ _ �-. RO�1 WA� TYP ' � � � `-' � - , „ . - - i >_0 COSE ., � �;, �o' . _ \ : � _ . , � :; � / /� �rl� _ _ �� _ ^ l,.J} �.lUCiA / �!-1{ `_ — � ..�� "T=.=:� .__ _ �_ � _ _ .. \„ y „'- � ..,, �• \��. � ; . L.(21 CRDC \ ' ��f (4� SASI _ �, � "�_�ITC�-I W,� � w''F _ � -. / - �EEPAGL- F LOtti� _ � �{26�)��.F;ODI. �� ``'"` ._ (6�00�) CAOB y� � � _— ' '��.�33)��.SA�E:�. I .. �(3.) �R�_A � f , �600) SC,M � \ _(36)•• R0�1 . � (;50)�'JUEF \\ (.36J� COSE•.-- .. \' ..(��50�',r�GR � i �— WETLANO f30UNDA�� GErvERAL rvO,IE: ` �\ � � \ , wETLaND RESTOf�ari0rv ��„_ ;: 1„ S,EE ..FIGURE 2_ FOR �.. �', `. '' \' , ARE� _ �'�00 SQ =T pLANTING LEGEND �ANC ;�' r�=� �°-<s<<�'-�'' - �., I , � 2 SEE �IGURE 3 �Oi,� � � , �� i uC-d(��ii': - - .... �OU �WAD DE fAIL. ` S�.n`E -.i0'-c7" NC�i=? i"I I _ -�, , I � �------- I i. � �m�� KURAE�IASI 99��,.,,R� � PLANTlNG LECENO , ISEES PVWTING ..�..�.�.•".. 1. LEGEND '.,,.„ V,";„ ABBR. pTY, SYAIBOI 80TMIICA(. COMA/pN NAME CROUN__ p �pyFR ;;;�r��%-,��w�, $12E CONDIiION /�ggR, QTy. $YAIBOL BOTMlICA� �COMMON NAME �U 8 O $IZE/SPACINC CONOITION Mnue rvbro / Rsd Nder 4'-6' Bd�Q CA00 1290 �' Carez obnuDfa / $lou9h Sadpe 12' O.C. ClU4P5 CR00 5 Cratoeque douqloa�i / Douqloe Howthorn � 4'-6' BdcB JUEF 750 Jonw� effoeue / Soft Ruah � FRI.A 3 Frozin�e Ialifofio / Oreqon Aah 4•_ 12 O.C. CLUAIPS G' 8dc0 SCA/l 1290 �'^ � Scirpw m�crocarpus/ Smail–frufted Bulrveh 12' p,C. TUEtERS � � OUGA 7 uorc�e porryano / Corry Ook e�B TEGR 750 � Teliimo 9rondYlora / Frinqe Cup 4• � �� I 4–6 1' O.C. POi StiSI 10 � Sollx eitchenefe / Silka willorr V�,� N 4'-6' ghp �� Gli� ABBR. piY. SYMBOL BOiANICAL /COAIAIDN NMAE SIZE/SPACINC CONDITION LIVE STAKES COSE 9�6 Q Cornue aericeo / Redoaler Oo wood AB6R OTY. 5YlABOL BOiANICAL CONAION W�A�E 4 N001 9 2 CAL•. 42� O.C. CONTAtNER MPIIGnON RAiE CONqT10t� t� 16 m Holodiacue diacolor/ p�aa�_Sp�ay 2 CAL, 60" O.C. CONTA1NfR COSE 200 Cornus �e�tceo / Redosier Ooqwood 2' O.C. LNE STAKE � ROPI 36 � Roea pieocarya / Cluelered Rosc ' 2 CAL, 42' O.C. CONTAINER MIN. 2' �"-`� SACE 33 � Sambucua cer�leo / Dlue Elderbe LENC7n ^Y 2 C+1L.. 60" O.C. CONTAINER � � c�-�� N�T�S � (� �-� �. �. CONTRNC70R SHALL VERIFY A�L OUM7TITIES, AIfJSURFMENTS .WO SITE CONOIT10N5. � � ��; �• USE 6ARK AIULCH TO A OEPTH OF y' UNOER NEWLY PUNTEO TREES � Z• THE CONTRACTOR WILL STAKE, OR FL1G, PROPOSEO PI.ANT BEO NJD TREE LOG1T10N5. �D SHRU85. 11-IE CORNERS OF ALL SHRUB M10 CROUND COV'ER BEDS SHALI 8E STAKED TO ALIOW ^ �� FOR REVIEW gY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTAiNE. 8• AL� PLMITS, UATERIALS, PL�WIINC ANO SEEDINC ACi1VI11E5 5}ULl CONFORM (� J. A PRE–PUWTING AIEETING WILI BE tiElO. CONTACT OWNER'S REPRESEN7AINE AT {�$T TO NORIAA� LWOSGPE INDUSTRY STANOAROS. INFERIOR PL,ANT'S OR SEED WILL �,—, TWO WEEI(S PRIOR TO THIS IAEETINC. SUBMIT TO OWNER'S REPRESENTATNE WITH NVRSERY BE REJECTED. � ^ 'SHIPPINC U5T" TO VERIFY PROPER SPEC�ES MID OUANTITIES. PROVIDE ONLY SOUND, y• CONTIt�CTOR SW�1.L CONTROI BUICKBERRIES, TFi1SiLE. TEASEL, PURPI.E �� (-'' HEALTHI'. VICOROUS PLMITS, FREE OF DEFECTS, OISEASES AND AlL FORMS OF LOOSESTRIFE, SCOTCN BROOAI AND REED CAN,VtYGR,�55 Wfi1CH MAY p JV �� INFESTATION. SAA(pLES OF PL,WT TAOS, COAIPOST, MIO SEEO MUST 8E SUBMITTED ON SITE 111 NEWLY PUNTEO MEJS UNiIL FINAL ACCEPTANCE. �LOP � DY THE CONTRhCTOR FOR REVIEW M10 APPROVAL 8Y OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE, �� i NO PUWTING WICL BE PERFORMEO DEFORE THIS NEE7INC. OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE ��' CONTRI,CTOR ShiALL PRONOE ONE–YEAft PU�NT WqRRqNTy Af7ER ACCEPTANCE � � AIAY A/AKE ADJUSTMEN7S TO PINJT LOCAiIONS A7 THIS TIME. OP PLMIiINC BY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. THE CONTRACTOR SFlALL REPUCE AlL � DFaD OR UNHEALT1iY PL/NlTS FOUNO BY OW��ER'S REPRESENTAT1vE AT THE END OF � wl 4. PUNTING PERIOD �5 WEATNER DEPENDENi iwD PVNTINC SEOUENCE SHN1 BE T1�1E WARRi1NTy pER100. �D.IUSTED ACCOROINC TO SOIL A�OISTURE. ALL TREE, SFIRUB, M!0 CROUNpCOVER ` SE DNG SFIALL`pE COMPLETE pY iF{E FlFTEENTNF'OFTOCi08ER�UNRE SOPUNTING^PERI00 " P�T QUANTITIES SHOWN ON PLMlS ARE FOR CONTRAC70RS CONVENIENCE ON�Y. � TNE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR P�/�NTINC AT THE SPEC�FlEO O.C. OISTANCE r�� IS EXTENOEO 8�' OWNER'S REPRESEFlTAT7VE AS A RESULT OF CONTINUING IAILD WEAiHER. SHOWN ON THE PLMITINC I,ECENO. 5. KEEP PUNT$ IAOISi AND SHADEO UNT1L INSLILUTION. 00 NOi LEAVE 7HEM IN 12� S�� µ0 WEIWJD PLWT FERTIUZATION REOUIREMENiS SHALL CORRESPONO TO � � THE SUN OR LET THEAf DRY OUi. W�TER PL�NTINC AREJS AF7ER PW�lT SPECIFlGITION 02930 – 2J5 WETUWD PWJ7INC SOIL MIX. '�11J' INSTALLATION, 13• PL/NT1NG AfiEA$ SHOWINC TWD �IFFERENT SPECIES (I.E. SCIRPUS M!D GftEX) SH��L � 6. DIC, PACK, TFLWSPORT /WD hi/Wp�E /�LL P�MlTS WITH CAfiE TO ENSURE BE PLMITED N1T1/ EQUAL NVAIBERS lWJDOM�Y SPACED IN PW�i pORDER tiS S��OwN, PROTECTION FROM INJURY. STORE PLMITS IN 7HE MANNER NECESSAf2Y TO 14. INSTREM! WORK SFiA�L TAKE PLACE BEfWEEN JUNE 1 M7D SEPTEI.(pER 30. F NECES�M�' TOEPROTECiCR00i 0 LLSQMlD KEEPS THEAI`fROM D Y1R NC 15. CONiRACTOR SHA�L NOi COMPAC7 BACKFlLI. OUT. ��c��.r: � G�1.u.,,. ' � ;��=u: i � ��i�.< <- ( - ' - ---,i-- , UNDISTURBEO NATIVE SOIL EXISTING �ANK AND BED �� ICURAIIASI LIMIT OF [XCAVATION '"°°'^T�` ' — COMPACT NATIVE SOIL �ACKFIIL TO 80% �� '�� ' .. ','„m,. 2"X4"X24" WOOD STAKES CUT � FROM UNTREATED DOUG FIR \ 2"X4" STAI<ES 4' O.C., 7YP. � UVE STAKES � —ROOT WAD �t� � �;)�y,��i FINISH GRADE UVE STAKES � 2' O.C., TYP. (U� \�i\y�� ;��y��, . �' ROLANKA BIO D-MAT 90 " EROSION CONTROL BIANKET l �� % ' � � , ��, � ,� � �� (OR APP. EQUAL), TYP. � � � � ��iy � r i r Y�� ;,��, � � �� '_�" � - �� L � � ��` y �.` �, o � ./ / � ,��., � �, ��J'.f� �� " � �� .i� �� sf� '��G�� VA�IES � W000 STAKE CV ` �'.�� -- ;� ✓i `L �, �v v� .,._., �� ' ' _ � �`�� '�� , �y':�', ,�>, �,�,�� v��,��,��Y� '� ' �L .V v, � (u, � � � � y I � r� � � � � � � � � � � � � l� �'�i��i��'�/ /�� r r �� ,/�� / ) / �j�� `I' � � i. n �� , �,��y� �t`(= i �_ .��i i�.� .l,. �{�v��,�,��<� .N � � �� i� � / �L � �\ � ^j- � -0 S�CTION / � uv� � � � �� ROOT WAD _ ^ � y EMBANKMENT � " DEPTH p�,N �� II �// tJ` II NOTES: V�L1 i. ROOT WAD TO PROTRUDE INTO CHANNEL THE DEPTH OF THE ROOTMASS AS MEASURED FROM EXISTING E3ANK CHANNEL. '� 2. TREES REMOVED FROM SITE SHOULD BE UTIUZED AS ROOT WADS. COORDINATE WITH OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. �� 3. CUT LIVE STAI<ES END TO A POINT FOR EASIER INSTALI.ATlON. � 4. TRIM OFF QRANCNES FROM LIVE STAKES W/ CLEAN CUTS. 5. LIVE STAKES ARE TO QE P�ACEO 2' O.C. 6. �ATTER R00T WAO TO MATCH EXISTING CHANNEL BANK. ti��Q��: - � SOFT GABION �,"°"�� SCALE N TS (SECTION & PLAN) ��`�`�' ! � ��U�t3.`=i � _ ------ i � 5 . . ;--� _ - � .� ' . i � � � ` , ., �� - ---i _ _ . , ; _; ;� . . , . � , . . , . � ,._ j , : � / , . >�- _ ; , .._ / , ... , -_. �, , . . -- �i�� ',.... �' .� i.. . .�,, ]-- ._. .._._. .. . ,. . , ,:j l.� �Y�� , . � � � [�CJR�III�\� �J' , � ,'/� �- _� �EGEND : ,�.,:`. .. . � � P1 ... °� .. �'� ��1 - ' � - PHOTO LOCATION POINTS '. -` 1, - - , , � � , ,�� / _ � \\ � . , r I,,f . . I ` /\ /i \\\\ \ , � ' \ �^ , I�; ' � "�.\ �, � . r �, `' \ ',� - f . `. '.1. �- { j�. i;. . . � (� .�/ � . �, _. / � . � � .��'� i � � � J^j%' ' I ;,i f M1 �L . � �� ,, ;` y� i -�� .� �- / ..\ � �/��.. � J��, .i ..� . ... J �_ ,,/ �yli` . I ; , '� � �.�.. .-- `��- �� i � �� ,4,1��,; �` -� � �� , . , r, ;<' \ � i �<. , � \'', �, ' . . �� i , \ `.��°.�ZSI -`(� � . i � , r \ ' - P� �� , . w � ; P ,r-- `,I ,!� .,= ,,/ � ,... ,,;.,,.,,,,,--- .,;�} I � ,�;. � , ✓`_/ , �� . �t� t.y�'" 1 7 i , ,�; ' �� !�r ! _- � > � � - . � � �'�, ---. ��. l� ; �, , _ - ,, . I _ � � �� , <, �I ;,' IuL ; _ . � � � '� I yy� ��-'� ..' .iY I / ' .. .,-r' � t( �� t ,l � ._ . ' j� . �.� � � � � . _ I - � \ � ... ... ._._. . . , , • �i . fh�+�'� � j. \ • � � . .. , � ... . � .;�� -_ : �-:.�. � ... - ,'•`\ ' . . , ' , .._ . . .. . � � i ' 7 �. . , ' \ � ,� _ �/��i 0 .. -- , .. ;i� \� f..}!•I ' .l_.,�f;� , ,.. ..,, _ �;-�-"- - , : , /, ., _ • � - ' . .. . .._- , __ ,,,.. � ., , . - . ' � , _ , � ____ ....._.r -;' _ i^ - ...., 3l .. . , . . } { !,1�1,J��f l.,Y . " . �"�. .� _.. ... \... � +.. . ' . � .. . �� J;.. � , � r' . : �.. . li\ � \ , - �� .. �L ,� ((Lj)�1�.�. . . , .� . � � �. � � L\ ;� � '.�. . . �� .. ., -�yr�i:.-� 1 �\�� , � -., . I ` I . ... ,�� ,<! . -- _ / � � `�_ �`��i � ` �_ . / / .. � .� �/ P2� �� _ . --\ � / � � ...- �� \ . • G �(,� C � r, ��' _ _ �..� ` \ � .. r�� I '.' . ' . I � ... ..� . � � �� , �� . , '� . .. . ' . �� . . � . � . , . �\ �� . � . . � - �. A' � �. . . • �. � � ' ,`.tiiC:.,:��----- ' � ., .. � .. , - - _ �J�DA�'r,lt(l,_il,,� �--�^ , -T- ��r- --- ,�� , �r�i� u: ,�,� ,�� < �� _-�- � �,�.��_e � -ao'-o" NC��, �!-�' . - �� ( -- - - - I ---� ;i , • Pl�rn�Aln�rrlori�r�Objcclr��e.c nrrr!Srrccess Criterirr ! 1'hc nionitorinb boa(s arc (o hc ��cliic�.�ccl by nicctin�; Uic 1��llowinb ob.jcctivcs and succcss critcri�: I •1'!n„rinb P j�� Lstablish riparian �vclland plant communily ovcr lhe 7,800 sc�uarc lect of wetland resloralioi� arca. ��URAIInS .a.oc�.rrs i �I�I�c succcss crilcria will bc,it fcast 80 perccnt total vcgetativc covcrabe (estimaled visually) tl�e end af tlie 17rst ycac. °'�°"' `°�° "l�he success critcria will bc al Icast g0 percen[ tolal vcbctative coveragc(eslimated visually) by desirable nativcs by ehe end of thc seconcJ ycar. -1'he success criteria will be 3(1��erccnt total vegewtive coverage(eslimated visually) by tl�e end of ti�c monitorinb period (tliird year). "fhc succcss criccria is to havc nalivc trccs wcil cstablishcd by thc cnd of lhe monitorinb period. "�l�c succcss critcria is tli�t non-n;,tivc invasivc spccics rced cai�arygrass and Ilimalayau blackbcrry sliall nol cxccccl 20 ��crcc��t co�•cr allcr tlircc years. r �r • 1�Ioniloriug Pro�;ran� , "l�o ensurc ll�e successCul con��letioi� ul�lhe restoralion plan, nionitoring will be coi�ducted over tl�ree years. An as-built topographic survey �vifl be n conducted and an as-buill report subi»iUecl �vitl�iu 6U days after initial plantinb is cornpleted. Inspections �vill be conducted ouce annually in the tluce ycar monitoi�ing period; �vitl� a coinprchcnsi��c rcport con�piled for cacli annual visit, by a lrindscapc architcct or a biologist. 'I'hc tl�i�cc monitorin�repor�s will I includc tcxl dcscribing findinbs ;�ncl conclusious, plus photograpl�s of sitc conditious,plant perforina�cc data, liinitcd hydrolobic dala, and other inCor�ualion n � sucl� as obsci-vcd wildlifc usa�c. ,", p; .i1lo�riloriii{� Crilcrra � II r� I I'la,r:ir�g �� [�his prograii� �vould tuonilor vcbcl8U011 �)aIF1111C1CfS COf.l�)CCIOCI OCLIlI'CC)'Ci11S 1(1(1 I11CI11(�C 1'CC011ll11C11(j8U0I1S IOI"t"Cl]lOV2lI 1fILI �I1�1111bCI11Clll (�I UI1(�Ctilf<I�)IC �' I� invasivc spccics, to prccludc clominancc by one s��ccics. "Total j�11i�t cou�its csta�lishc� on the mitigation planlii�g plan will bc used in detcrnuning ^� �r� �cbctalion paramctcrs discussccl bclo�v. Selcctcd lrccs tivill be tabecd in ordcr to inonitor gro�vth and suivival i�alcs oCdiftcrcnt s��ccics iu a rangc ol� � loca[ions. In addition, permancnl pholobraphie poinls would be establislied to provide further documentatiou of ll�e c(�anges in �vclland vebcti1L1011 OVCI' � �, �;T timc. Scc Mitibation Pla�it Moni�orinb Plaii lor locatiotis of proposcd photo poin�s. ,A�u�ual vcgetatioii sait�pling would bc conducicd durin� latc March, �� ('1' and in thc latc growinb scason. Cacl� of lhc paracuetc;rs to be n�onitorccl is furtl�er dcscribed below. u. Yegelnlio�t rLlo�iilori�rg: Vcbctalion �vould be monitored aunually during late Mai•cl�and U�e latc growing scasoii within two wccks of thc sauic ti�iic �,u; ^ every year. Monita-ing would coiisist ol�specics list compilation and estiiliated percent cover of vegetation witliiii established ciiitiba(ion arca. �fc� �` sup�le�ncnt tl�is iu(oi�mation,��I�otographs �vould be taken tl�al provide a i�epi�escutalive sample of eacli shrub and groundcovcr s��ccics��roposecl. J 1 � Groundcover data woulcl be collecled , and shrub ancl tree data collected wiU�in tl�e restoralion bounda�y. "^ I J b. Ti�ee Tn�s: "1'o documcnt Uic rates oi'growtl� and sut,��val, a represcntative trcc will bc laggcd and nionitored. "['o supplcnicnt lliis inti�nn;i�;on, �� I I�hotograPl�s of thc tabecd lrcc �vould bc cakcii. - , c. Oi�ervreivPhotobruph/c Sni��lii��: To supplentenl llte sampling nieasuretncilts describecl above, permanent o��en-icw l�liotv�,raE�hic E�uin�s wuulcl be ,r,,,, �i cst��i,i�si,�<i 5<<rr,�«��c t� ��>�-i�Ic consistci�t �>�i�t�br��hic do;;uincntation fur�hc cntirc initigation arca and lhc ovcrall cl�aractcr of thc restorccl �vcllancls. r� � ��, i� . Contii��cnc�� ['robrain ,� Should Uic cJcsircd n�itigalion Soals no� bc achicvcci, a cou�inbciicy ��i•obr<ii» �vill bc initiatcd. Tl�c first stcp of�hc continbcncy ��rograii� is �v com��lctc an �� c analysis of tlic cause of failurc in meclinb a mitibation perCorn�ance standarcl. Ouce delermit�ed, �P})1'O�)IlB�C I'CIl]C(I1811011 �te!>s �vould be proj�osed. �f�l�csc SIC�)S 1111y IIIVOIVC 1'Cj)I1Ctllb j)I.11115 llllt Ilavc not survivcd or adclitional plantinbs if growili ratcs arc poor, increasing frcqucncy of maintcnancc and �vatcrin�; -- schedules, wced coutrol efforts si�ould recd canarygr<iss ai�d Himalayaii blackber►y pec-sist,and furtl�er excavation or adj�istmenls to site hydroloby if �s��-r== rcquircd to providc tl�c ncccssary liydrologic rcbimcs. A �vrittcn plan�vill bc submittcd to DSL for thcir approval prior �o im��lcmcn�in�;thc �>lan. Tl�c �ilan will iucludc an unplctucnlation schcdulc and idcnlify fuudinb sourccs and Par�ics (namcs, tillcs, addresscs, and ��honc nwn�crs) res��onsiblc for implcmcnting and moi�itorinb thc sticccss of tlic contingci�cy plan. ��1.'0 .=�. :C'JrG_1i-: ' I I — - I� , I I �_ - - . i ------ ------ � � �` v I > � I � � I � ^ ,, � � � � o f �,� � Z Q � � j m � � � � rt soo � �t scoo�� n „c� , �� I� � i _ Hf?L[ B L l/D o�q� — 1f=�'��_��__._��S.cti� .-6f00 — T C —�O�" IZ 7p/ � (� �I I � —1� _ �f �— I lJDO I, � ' —� — Jsq1 � __ I � � � -._..._ .. � � � ... —� — ---i— _ .�?�� --__—�___ __ C 600 � I __ � �.._..,. . �� ... .... �'� —_—_c— �' . '! . 72 400 I _R� �..... ',___:. , .,. ;,�.,��_, '..: .._�•�.�.:. . ..a_�^..�`� al+� �'� ��— �.1,�r ��.m � _ r� IL oc��lion of Cuivei7 J �z soo r n zoo � � •-..._.��'�- • --—_ --- - _ �,� �� (o be Q;rfended�J � � i rc�ioa T� aoo �`i\ � '-_ �_----- — --_ -- �s.«, i � � � 78w/DUND 3/B/nC'H/kCW � I \ 1/ .._�.._ .._ : � I N97N A I I !• �D Gl,/� . F,4N/VO PO/NTE � I�� I "`"P""� _ � �`�"�,"""'61P I IDE l/EL OPMENT i� h i �'ROPOSED T/GARO `�"'�"°"°E�Q� � 'I i� �� L/B R A R Y /T E I � � �� 3 I � Approx}'mate L ocation I i I � � of P�o�osed Bioswa/e—�� /- � � � �� ( J \ LEGEND I I I I I I � �Sidewalk II J I I � � ;i � � i IAp,oro,rimale Location �: �a�,dsca�,��,�; � � ' i i �i�i I of Fanno Creek —�� ii , , � �� , � , � � � � � � , � � � ,, \�, �� o au ioo �nu � � � �i SCALE IN f'EET i FIGURE � , Location of the Holl Boulevard widening project (base mop providea by " ;, ,., �,j � � i I DeHaas and Associates, 2003). ' I l— —� —- - � - _;�; i ii� � � i 1'aciric I-labitat Scrviccs, liie. �� i i'. � i o �i� � � , I li � O � � F � I Ex�sl C8 � I j-- So 1f77J1, 1J.SS' R7 Cnnsl��c! � �� i G�a(e 156.2J � I � Abondon O OT in/el CC-? - � I % � r EX/ST. I PVC,.� f� // B/vd. I �� p � � _ � Ex�sL we�/and ;. + (�-� I I � �P/PE \ I�I � �L� '`� �1 I � � iE=�50. �i I °i_—. __._.--- I ../E 14 .B7 � r � '� Ex�st CB � ' � �� ` ;�� I��.are J56.1B � i� / � � __ :�TP. BUYARti' T� � i � I � fX�sr ce Q I � �i� ' � CREEK � '� I c��re /56.1 ' � r�- FANNO � �i _; � � j ..- �sa��,---� I "� � � __=.-___-= 44 c u. y�. o( � : �,...� , ; �'� , � � (._ _�G"'. � � � Upl�nd lo hn � �I.. i rE 1.5l.9J--� -�I �'.p0t \ \ Remove ex�sL ' . I'`�� ----� - ----------'t, ��, 18" 5l/. C�/vcrf EXCBVc'I�CC� � � � � \ Reconslrucl chonne/ i � �� , � � ` l0 EXIP.fI(1 ; _i----_ I �;� � •I ; 24�� C76- A// t�l�s/opes in � Ii �� I �. : �1 ; � Co crete Ivert p�pe out/low oreo C�laI11lE'� � i � �� Removc Culrcr� I �' � 5- O.OJlO (o be 2:l'A/ak. ��,. � �\ � � Loca ion o 3.5 f �k�y 3.5 ft. Gap in 18" and 24" Culverts ' � �; I;�— I � �-— i. �I 24' Conc culv rf � —-- ---- �'--I �� j I 1E 752.09 ('','� � � i� � � - -�_-- _ s � � i; � , i -- - ! , i � � , ; ; Ii � � j' ,z- co„� t � ! ; , L i , I cu/ver1 � I ti � I I I_ -- -- - -_ ---— — —�--�- /_ .��. ;..�� --- -Rri;ir 5.5,� I �--� .SI- I' �i . Ne,'w m 156. 2 .rE�� __—.._- ; / 151.J4 � _ ._... __._--_•._�_ , � � � I REG/nl,�l;_ _�N--- � , ��.�-- � i �,� �� __--_�� N� , , � , � � � . , _ � ` � � '� j � i � ; � / — `\\ -...._ _ I � �1 � ; �,,i'i ; '`^ ►, � �_� , % � ',' l ��'I I�, _ � � �� ro ; �— � SCAI.F [N FEE'C ;I � � � FIGURE . , Plon v�ew ol the culvert extension for the Hall Boulevard widen�ng pro�ect �-� � , � �� I (bose map provided by DeHaas ond Associotes, Inc., 2003). �� -<v- -- � �'��'� I'aci[ic llabital 5crviccs, Inc. � --- ---� - -�-,"_'� � -- i . __'.--.__ ......_._..__ , ....__..__ .. .__-__. ._•-----_ .------ , I _.._..__--.._— . . , ._--__._.----i'-'.-----_—.—.-.—.-'—."" ..------�---._.. .__ . . .... _....--- � i R/W , q h I � � . � � W h� � � � !.._ . ._.O `r � � � V .;p N B� PUE ! � j I .... . . .. ..O ., 'n , U O h v� „ b� � � O., � O W i �m;r� W v ��4�i � � � ' ; 160 � +o„� � �, p�.�.`� � ° , � : � I � ... . _. _......_ I _x:_ W � e �2 Z_�_ . . . _ _ + "'_ .._ . _ _ .__._... _ ___. __ .. „ � ; _.--� + �p�� _ . . � I ._...... , � �� _ _ _ _ � � vww4, � ' � I . .... ; � � — . � �2�J dla�. �o � � �� v - ro � A � DISTANCE BETWEEN EXIST��I � �� °' � 1S'Y �N I + II � ; r— ` 18" AND 24".CULVERTS . _ _ _ ___ _ _4�; � � �' � i �I � �,� : � I � i ~ t� _ . � �� . U i i� _ _ _ _ _� _ ` h O II W 3 ; __ E,•"�s�.�027 �� Cu/v�ry � i j I_ � � I I .._ �_�` ~ �� l � _ �� u ! 150 0 � , _. � � � � _. ;.__ . _ .. _ . , _ EX,sr. — _ _78. Sr� Culve� . i—� i _ _ __ I I , � I Scale: 1 "=j 10' Horiz. � i m �- _� , i , i � „ i i a � -- ; _.__ . _.._..I =I 2� Ve,'t. ; a o i � � — -� � I ��n � ^ Remove exisl. 18" I I I ; Sll. culvert ' � � ±W� + �'' 24" C76-V Concrefe Cu/verf i � 14G s= o.n.�ro ! � _ �� i �� ._ .__ .._ _. _...__--__ .-- ; ' f00 _ _ 1+40 __. _._ 1+80 _ _ .. 2� �(, � 10 2V SChLE IN FF,E"I' , � � � I f IGURE Typ�ca� cross–section of the culvert extension for the Holl Bouievard � I w�dening project (base map provided by DeHoos and Assoc�otes, Inc., � I I I � 2003). , �., „� �I —� ;;;- � I I'i�',� I 1'a�ific 1{abitac Scrvices, Inc. � � - — --- ----------- — — — — --- - --- �_ . I� iGENER�L NO rES: 1. Pro teC t all tree� on �,�'e, �! � � i � � � � i\ I CONS TRUC rION NO TES Ii � I; ' ��'!_.'� =,,�J - 1. Exrstin buildin s ? � i ``-,•_'�.;�.,�_�_.�. (o be � I , , �_, � � 9 9 I �- , . removed by othe�s. ':� i � �I� � � / �'..� - � y;� 0 . �. � o ��,-;. �� -- �.��.L,. __ 2� Construct wote� quolitY � � � i \ % • . -^.��':_.�n- �"�" � ; swole. �i� I � ij j�� , ,� - .�_.. i,_;, •�_ �� _ __ �-- I I ' i � ` ; , .3. Construct ditch inlet. See �j!1 . � i � -- _ �� - ._. / Detarl B ond C. ��-is � I i i r ` � -- � r � 22' . 24. r, y ^ �.._. / Curlez E�lonkel ' , I J '� � � i `�� Connect to new sto�m sewer � � � '� ,_� � Y',�► �, -� � �� in s t ree t. Begin wa t er I ,,; �,_ qualrty focrlity bid ilem. ; J l, i, �r�� -�` �`' -... . O � ` yY--, � �� ' - . _ � ; 5 Construct inlet (lowpoa; /ull �' � � °' ,.,�;;:. N� � _ �� - �;�,, . � i �" ;;, wrdth of channel. � ',;,?;_ � � F �i �� i I . � `� �x/��' \ ,�, . : { � � v-�Y€n�� srnuCn�aE 6 Reseed swole ofter g�edinq. I ,, ' __. iE=�39:sst . ' �J ��1�;��---- .r- , � �°� See londscape plans. c � I ,� _'-�-- r ___ — — � " I .-.J ` . �P.�..[� _ '..•, .J �'. � ` � I��' ` I i �.1._ ". �I �� y. . � .'Q,� Y�� '; 7. Instoll sedimentory monhole. j o s° � ��`'��--~��•.�-:-__ i--, � o , � _.._ ,o� �,� �, � I See Detorl 0. Rim= t 145.00, * ' ' �` ._ , , � I .� �-� ,�'�o � . , r,/ lE rn= 141.23, lC out= � -- I '• ; y� _ . �t rw' .."_.._.._.–J'— b'E.� � _ '.'� ` • . ` ' I I 141. 15 Sump= 134. 73. -- � � � � � ,, 1•. �R _� � DirC�� w�ET 'i `•' � �� , � i- �' � �._-- ��iE iH_tno.3�, I � - `I � I I I ...� . E o � I �—� � . IE��OUT=140.35 I�.�� Locofe ond obandon existing�0+73 ' i�� 1r� ; � '. � - ' � I ` _ �;� -,_J� �,- i, IE OU1= t41.9� s.. � ' �, f'_ � .il �veN wifh ConC�e�e in �,__;168LF �Z� �I _p� �` _�' � \ ,_--v � a c c o r d a n c e w r l h O r e g v n I j l � !� � ` � 576�'Con�,_�, � ��,�n� � �er' �. o �� Woler Resources ' � i �,�ti�i , i ' I ,_ ,, A o%, requirem en t s. (By Oth e�s) ' -- i � ; !,._ '� L �� ' f, \\� z5 ��„a i - ......, , - , .,\, � i � i� � "� � 4 I� ... V,�� \ ..d� 9. Hydroseed ony distu�bed � � �;. �'J"a L�=o� � °J -- - III � il I\" �4 .To o —o—o---�z•X6�Y+0" SCALF. IN FF,[iT' I a�eas not covered by ' a''�� '~ -._, � ,�r� c�nss so aiP �nP p �� lonascoping plons. ! i � I �F�U E Plan view of the I � propo_,ec' bioswale for the Hall Boulevard w�dening project . '� I � (base map provided by DPHoas and Associates, Inc., 2003). � �� I i � + I �I----- _ _ I m�`�� l'aci(ic I�Iabit:�t Scrviccs, Inc_ � '� - --- -- �r�*�� r-- _ __ _ — .__ _---- ----- __ --- -- __ i . i � ; i ! ! � i j ---_..__ . --. _ . _ _._,_ __ __�- --- _--------- � -- � . ---- •------ – ---._.. , _ _ . _ __.._ __ . � � .__--- ,ri�v � � , ...__: �� Cx�,shaq Rouav . ; � i 1�7i . •A . , , , . i --._. _; . _ _ � � � I � ---: ------- ---- _..._--- __ ---._.. _.__ _ ._ _._ . _ bs e �o '- _- ____�.. I � I. � .. . �, . . ' . . ...__.�..� . _ ...- ...__ . _ _ . ""_ _"'. ��' ; '\ . ... . � j YwJ l•rDU�rJ� II �� . i� . i ' '..__ I. . � I . I �. . IIIi j ' . � , I . . ' " _' ' � '.�__ , � _ _ � v ,...�_- . i � )r f . . t r . .� — � �i� J... " il.�w, __'_ '_"�'i' �111 . I .��< <" <C' � �_ .,.. _ : . , "'_.__. . � _ �� , .__�_._ ' _ .k0 �I1V) i ' � � -- - .. _ �� `�' . �, :--{ _, i�--',�� I I . �/ i ',n - . ' • � , � � .. .•�. - ._. .. ' , _ -. la0i .s� 1; (7 J/.-�._..-_r�I"_-� ' ,Botto , ae swo'e � � � � __ ...'� I.. . i � �i J ' . � �, i � �.._...-�— . ' � --- -, :, . j '- -'-_-- . �-•�I ' --^_._ -- _ � �_:� -�I . �� :. �IO : ' ! ' • ' � -L`.y--!^.- . _.�.... ..__'_.-i � . ' ', ' ��i �� . ' � i� '!1'nVC Sr•�C' I . i '.___"___' . I � -. i:� . : , � _.t �uy, il C'�!;_V c c � I ' � s a.,�a. � i r.re � i ; �� ,. ' i . . � � � _,.. �., , �. , +� . ..� '_'-.. -"- ._.) „t_ --, ' - ,—__ - :i-'-_. -'t tS''" _�rq__',1J! . . 1 :i j � �t-.:Yo. . `��',' , , . L .. . . . � c�. � ;.i . � ___ � �JZ + ! " � "!' � C p� ! CURLEX BLANKET- . , � � ,�_ i --- . __....------�---�------c-�r...w.-J._.— ... � �� +x1 '��---�- � I J�i� 1 �I!` ---�� --'----- —' -- -...----'- -'--...___- ' .. - I�� -- � ,i d�,4 ., � � p ' , ;., �,-` �.��i`� � , ' ' .._ �18� c . +��57 ty'� � � : ' ; : �� . �:� 1 �. . � --- ---- --- , ,-- --•---•-----�----�----- ---;--- ---- - � � i 'J+. �'.`� 0�-BO N10 +60 , 1� � _ r:• ' . -'-- —� --- ---------'- ' _ ' . , � .. �OU OF�0 -------.__..-'-------�-�----�--- ' .._.. _. ____ _.__'_ .___.___ . _"" _'___ ' +00 2+10 ?fN0 J+7!) ' � ---- --- ---�------------_- _.--._'--._._. .__._. .--- -.. , I � � C � � � i U 25 __n .nn W I I I _ � ' I � scni.e irv eF:r•,r � � � ' FIGURE TYp�cal cross–section of the proposed bioswale for the Hall L�oulevard � w�dening project (base map provided by DeHaas and Assoc�ates, Inc., '' � � � 6 ZG�3�. , ,� i _ I I'II�� I Paciric Itabitat Scrviccs, Inc. �m '� - — — – - __ � Portland District Re�ional (�on�iitions (a) In-��ater ��'ork ��'indo��s: :111 �n-��atrr ��urk. �ncludine temporary fills or sU�uct�ues, shall c�c��ui het��een July 1 and September 30. Exceptions to these time penods require spec�fic approva] from the Corps. (b) Upland Uisposal: A11 excess matena] ��ll be taken to a swtable upland ]ocation for disposal rhe materia] shall be placed in a locat�on and manner that prevents its discharge �nto waterways or «�etlands. (c) Heavy Equipment: Heavy equipment shall be operated from the bank and not placed in the stream unless spec�fically authorized by the D�strict Engineer. Hea�ry equipment must be placed on mats or similar precauUOns must be taken to minimize damage to wetland resources. (d) Fish Screening: Fish Screening will comply ��ith standards approved by the National Marine Fisheries Service or the Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife,as appropriate. (e) Cultural Resources & Human Burials: Permittees must immediately notify the District Engineer �f at any time during the course of the w�ork author�zed, human burials, cultural resources, or historic properties, as identified by the National Historic Preservation Act, may be affected. Failure to stop work in the area of exposure until such time the Corps has complied with the provisions of 33 CFR 32�, Appendix C, the National Historic Preservation Act and other pertinent regulations, could result in violation of state and federal laws. Violators are subject to civil and crimina] penalties. (� Fist� I'assage: Permittee shall insure act�vities authorized by nationwide permit �vill not restrict passage of aquatic life. Activities such as the installation of culverts or diversion structures, or other modifications to channel morphology must be designed to be consistent with fish passage standards developed by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) and the National Marine Fishenes Service (NMFS). The standards can be found in the document entitled "ODFW standards and Criteria for Stream Road Crossings". The streambed shall be returned to pre-construction contours after construction unless the purpose of the activity is to eliminate a fish barrier. (g) Riparian Vegetation Protection & Restoration: When working in waters of the United States or riparian areas the construction boundary shall be minimized to the maximum extent practicable. Permittee shall mark and c]early de�ne the construction boundary before beginning work. Native riparian vegetation will be successfully establ�shed along tributaries ��here the vegetation was remo��ed by construction. 7'he plantings shall start at the ordinary high �vater mark and extend 10 feet back from the top of the bank. The plantings must be completed by the end of the first planting season fo]lo��vino the disturbance. � (h) Erosion Controls: All practicable erosion control de��ices shall be installed and maintained in good workin� order throughout construction to prevent the unauthorized discharge of material into a �-etland or tributary. The devices shall be installed to maximize their effecti��eness, e.g. sediment fences shall generally be buried or similarly secured. These controls shall be maintained until pennanent erosion controls are in-place. E v-��C z Pract�cable eros�on control measures �nclude but are not limited lo the follo��in�� a. Fil] �s placed �n a manner that a��o�ds disturbance to the maximum pract�cable extent (e.�. placmg fill w�th a machine rather than end-dump�ng from a truck); b. Prevent all construction materials and debris from entering water��ay; c. Use filter baes. sediment fences, sediment traps or catch basins, silt curta�ns, leave strips or berms, Jerse�� barriers, sand ba�s, or other measures suffic�ent to prevent movement of soil; d. Use impervious materials to cover stockpiles ��hen unattended or during rain event; e. Erosion control measures shall be inspected and maintained daily to ensure their continued effectiveness; f. No hea�� mach�ne�y in a wetland or other ��aterway; g. Use a gravel staging area and construction access; h. Fence off planted areas to protect from disturbance and/or erosion; and i. Flag or fence off wetlands adjacent to the construction area. (i) 1Ylaps and drawinbs: In addition to the items required in Nationwide Perniit General Conditions 13. all preconstruction notifications shall contain maps showing the project location as ��ell as plan-vie�a�and cross-sectional dra��ings showing the proposed work. The map(s)shall be of a scale and detail to clearly identify the project location(s). Drawings shall be sufficient in number and detail to accurately portray the project. (j) Bank Protection: Rip-rap shall be clean, durable, angular rock. The use of other materials such as broken concrete, asphalt, tires, �vire, steel posts or similar materials is not authorized. The project design shall minimize the placement of rock and maximize the use of vegetation and organic material such as root wads to the extent practicable. Riparian plantings shall be included in all project designs unless the permittee can demonstrate they are not practicable. The pernlittee must notify the District Engineer in accordance �vith nationwide permit general condition #13 for any activity that includes bank stabilization. (k) inspection of project site: "I"he permittee must allow representatives of the Corps to inspect the authorized activity to confirm compliance with nationwide permit terms and conditions. Personnel from the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality and the Department of Land Conservation and Development are considered to be authorized "representatives" for the purpose of Section 401 Water Quality or Coastal Zone Management inspections. For projects on tribal ]and the Environmental Protection Agency is considered an authorized representative. A request for access to the site will normally be made sufficiently in advance to allow a property owner or representative to be on site with the agency representative makin� the inspection. (1) Sale of propert��hrancfer of permit: 1f you sell the property associated �vith this pern�it, you must transfer the permit to the new o��ner(s) and obtain their signature(s). A copy of this permit ��ith the new o�a�ner(s) signature shall be sent to this office to validatc the transfer of this permit authorization. \�at�on�.��ide Pcrn�it General Condit�on� (From the Tanuary 1 ;, ?OU2 Fedeial Reaister. V�l. 67. A0 1�1) 1. ;�'aviQation 2. Proper Maintenance 3. Soi� Erosion and Sediment Controls 4. Aqt�atic Life Movements �. Equipment 6. Regional and Case-by-Case Conditions 7. 1�'ild and Scenic Rivers 8. T�ibal Rights 9. �T�'atei- Qual;ty l�. Coastal Zone Mana�ement 1 l . Endat�gered Species 12. Historic Properties 13. Notification 14. Compliance Certification 1�. Use of Multiple Natiomvide Pern�its. 16. Water Supply Intakes 17. Sl�ellfish Beds 18. Suitable Material 19. Mi�igation 20. Spa�vni�Ig Areas 21. Management of W ater Flows 22. Adverse Effects from Impoundments 23. Waterfowl Breeding Areas 24. Removal of Temporary Fills 25. Desi��lated Critical Resource Waters 26. r�ills Within lUU-year Floodplains 27. Consti-uction Period Encl. 3 1 I C. Aation�cide Permit Gcncral Conditions The follo��ing General Co:iditions mus� be follo��ed in order for an�-authori2a[ion by an \�\�'P to be ��alid . .�'n,�iQn!ia�. \�o acti��ity may cause more than a minimal adverse eifect on navigation. ? Prnpe,•Alarii�enn»ce. an �sn,act,�,e n� i�ll �nt inr�.�r{ cl�all 5 1..,.��_.. be proper!�:;;air,:a;nea, including n�ao�tenance to ensure public safe[y. 3. Sorl Erosio�r and Sedimenr Coritrols. Appropilate soil erosion and sediment connols must be used and ma�ntained in effective operating condition dunng construction, and all exposed soil and other fills, as well as any work belo�v the ordinary high u-ater mark or hi�h tide lir�e. must be permanently stabilized at tl�e earliest practicable date. Permittees are e�icouraged ro perfo�n� �vork �ti�ithin �vaters of the United States during periods of lo�v-now or !�o-flow. 4. A�iunlrc Life Monemerits. No activity may substantially disrupt the necessary life-cycle movements of those species of aquatic life indigenous to the waterbody, including those species that normally migrate thiough the area, unless the activity's primary puipose is to impound �vater. Culverts placed in streams must be installed to rr.aintain low flow•conditions. �. Eguipme�7t. Heavy eq�ipment ��orking in wetlands must be placed on mats,or other measures must be taken to minimize soil disrurbance. G. Regionn!and C�rs•e-Bv-Case Corrditio,is. The acti��ity must comply with any regional condi?ions that may have been added by the Division Engineer(see 33 CPR 3;0 4(e)). The activity must comply witl�any iegional conditions tha� may have been added by the Division Engineer(see 33 CFR 330.4(e))and with any casc specific conditions added by the Corps or by the state or tribe in its Section 401 Water Quality Certification and Coastal Zone Management Act consistency detemlination 7. �'�'i�d n�Td Scenic Rirers. No activity may occur in a component of the National Wild and Scenic River System; oi in a river officially designated by Congress as a "study river" for possible inclusion in the system, while the river is m an official study status; unless the appropriate Federal agency, with direct management respo�sibility for such river, has tieternuned in �i�riting that the proposed activity will not adversely affect the Wild and Scenic River designation, or study status. Infonnation on Wild and Scenic Rivers may be obtained From the appropriate Fede;al land management agency in the area (e.g., National Park Service, U.S. t=orest Service, Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Fish and Wiidlife Service). 8. Ti-ibal Ri�hts. No activity or its operation may impair reserved tribal rights, including, but not limited to, reserved �,��ater rights and treaty fishing and hunting rights. 9. Wnter Oualitv. (a) In certain states and tribal lands an individual 401 Water Quality Certification must 6e obtained or�vaived(See 33 CFR 330.4(c)). fb} For 1�'WPs 12, 14, 17, 18, 32, 39,40,42,43, and 44, where the state or tribal 401 certi};cation(either generically or individually)does not require or approve ��ater quality mana�ement measures, the permittee must provide water quality management measures that will etisure that the authorized �vork does not result in more than minimal degradation of a�ater quality(or the Co�ps deternunes that compliance with state or local standards, �vhere applicable, H�ill ensure no more than minimal ad�er;e effect on ��a[er quality). An important component of water quality managemen[ includes storinwater management that mininvzes degradation of the do�vnstream aquatic system, including water quality(refer to General Condition 21 for stonm��ater n�ana�ement requirements). Another impo�tant component of�rater quality management is the establishment and maintenance of ve�etated buffers next to open naters, including streams(refer to Gcneral ConditioEi 19 for ve�etated buffer requi.ements for the NWps). This condition is only applicable to projects that have the potential to affect�rater quality. ��%hile appropriate measures must be taken, in most cases it is not necessary to conduct detailed studies to identify such measures or to require monitoring. � '.'! Co:;>;nl Zore:ticr,,:��r-�,t��,;� j�� ,z:;a�r:, c,ates_ an �nd��dual st�;e coasta] zone manageinent consis,ciic�- �uncurrence must be ohtained or nai�ed (see �3 CFR Section ��0.4(d)). � 1 1 Endrm�ererl Species. (aj \o activ�ty is authorized under any\��'�%p, ��.}��ch is likely to jeopardi2e the continued existence of a threatened or endangered species,or a species proposed for such designation, as identified under rhe Federal Endangered Species Act(ES.A), or ��hich�vili destroy or adversely modify the critical habitat of such species. Non-federal permirtees shall tiotify the District Engineer if any listed species er desienated critical hab�tat ^�:�ht be a:fected �r is in the vicinity oi the project,or is located in the desienated critical habitat and sha11 not beein work on the activity unti] notified by the Dishict Engineer that the requirements of the ESA have been satisfied and tl�at the activity is authorized For activities that may affect Fedeially-listed endangered or threatened species or designated critical habitat, the r,ottfcation mast include the name(s)of the endangered or threatened species that may be affected by the proposed «�ork or that utilize the designated critical habitat that may be affected by the proposed ��ork. As a result of formal or informal consultation ��ith the F��JS or NMFS the District Enoineer may add species-specific re�ional endangered species conditions ?o the'��\�l%Ps. ` (b)Authorization of an acti��ity by a N�VP does not authorize the"take"of a threatened or endangered species as defined under the ESA. In the absence of separate authorization(e.g.,an ESA Section ]0 Permit, a Biological Opinion��ith "incidental take"provisions, etc.) from the USFWS or the NMFS,both lethal and non-lethal "takes"of protected species are in violation of the ESA. Information on the]ocation of threatened and endangered species and their critical habitat can be obtained dii ectly fi-om the offices of the USFWS and NMFS or their«�or ld �vide«�eb pages at http://�v��w.fws.gov/r9endspp,�endspp.html and http:/iwww.nmfs.noaa.gov/prof res/overvie�v/es.htm respectively. 12. Historic Properiies. 1�io activity�vhich may affect historic properties listed,or e]igible for listing, in tl�e 1�Tational Register of Hisroric Places is authorized,until the Dish�ict Engineer has complied w�ith the provisions of 33 CFR Part 325,Appendix C. Tlie prospective permittee must notify the District Engineer if the authorized activity may affect any historic propei-ties listed, determined to be eligible, or which the prospective pennittee has reason to believe may be eligible for]isting on the National Register of Historic Places, and shall not begin the activity until notified by the District Engineer that die requirements of the National Historic Preservation Act have been satisfied and tllat the activity is authorized. Information on the location and existence of historic resources can be obtained from the State Historic Preservatioil Office and the National Register of Historic Places(see 33 CFR 330.4(g)) For activities thai may affect historic properties listed in, or eligible for listing in, the National Register of Historic Places, the notificutro�� must state which]iistoi ic property may be affected by the proposed��ork o;include a ��iciaity map indicating the location of the historic property. ]3. Noti tcation. (a)Tlming; where reqnired by the terms of the NWP, the prospective pernuttee must notify the District Engineer with a preconstruction rrotificcrtion(PCN)as early as possible. The District Engineer must determine if the irotification is complete withi�i 30 days of the date of receipt and can request additiona] infoi7nation necessary to make the PCN complete only once. Hov��ever, if the prospective permittee does not provide all of the requested information, then the DisA ict Engineer��il] notify the prospective pernuttee that the notification is still incomplete and tlie PCN review process wil]not commence until al]of the requested information has been received by the District Engineer. The prospective pernuttee shal]not begin the activity: (1)Until notified in writing by the District Engineer that the activity may proceed unde,the I��\�JP with any specia] conditions imposed by the Dish ict or Division Enoineer; or (2) If notified in writing by the District or Division Engineer that an lndividual Pernit is required; or (3) Unless 45 days have passed from the District En�ineer's receipt of the complete»o�ification and the prospective pernvttee I�as not recei��ed n�ritten notice from the District or Division Engineer. Subsequently, the permittee's right to proceed under the N\��P may be modified, suspended,or revoked only in accordance ��-ith the piocedure set ford�in 33 CFR 330.�(d)(Z). (b) Contents of Notification: The nottfcotion must be in «�riting and include the followin; information: (1)Name, address and telephone numbers of the prospecti��e permittee; (2)Location of the proposed project; (3) Brief descripiion of tlle proposed project;tl�e project's purpose;direct and indirect adverse environmental effects the project would cause; any other N�'VP(s),Regional Genei•al Permit(s),or Individua] Permit(s)used or intended to be used to authorize any part of die proposed project or any related activity. Sketches should be , � pro�ided ��l�en necessar� «� �hu�,�. �l�;t the acti��it�� complies ��ith the ,er�ms of ihe A�\�A�P (Sketchrs �„su��ll�� larif�� tl�i� oroject and ��hen provicied resul� in a qu�cher dec�s�on); (4) For?��VPs 7, 12, 14, 18, 21, ;q 3g, ;9,40, A l,42, and 43, the PCN must also include a delineation of affected specia! aquatic sites, �nc]uding wetlands, ve�etated shallo�a�s(e�, submerged aquatic vz�etation, seaorass beds), and riffle and 000l compiexes (see paraeraph 13(�); ` " (�) For N��P 7 (Outfall Structures and Ma�ntenance), tl�e PC;�' must include information re�arding the oiigina� design capaciiies and confiourations of those areas of the Iacility where maintenance dredgin�or excavatior, is proposed; (6) For?v'WP ]4 (Linear Transportation Projects),The PCi�' must include a compensatory mitfgation proposa] to offset permanent losses of waters of the US and a statement describing how temporary losses of��aters of the US ��ill be nunimized to tlie rnaximum exteni practicable; {7) For I�rWP 21 (Suiface Coal Mining Activities), tlie PCN must include an Office of Surface Mu�ing(OSM) or state-approved mitigation plan, if appliczble. To be authorized by this NWP, die Dishict Engineer must deternline that the acti��ity complies with the terms and conditions of the?�'��JP and that the adverse environmental effects are nvnima] both individually and cumulatively and must notify the project sponsor of this determination in ��ritiiig; (8) For NWP 27 (Stream and Wetland Restoration), the PCN must include documentation of the prior condition of the site that will be reverted by the permittee; (9) For NWP 29 (Single-Family Housin�), the PCN must also include: (i) Any past use of tllis NWP by the Iildividual Permittee ancUor the permittee's spouse; (ii) A statement that the single-family housing activity is for a personal residence of the permittee; (iii)A description of the entire parcel, includin�its size,and a delineation of wetlands. For the puipose of this NWP,parcels of]and measurin� '/.-acre or less �vill not require a formal on-site delineation. However, the applicant shall provide an indication of where the wetlands are and the amount of wetlands that exists on the property For parcels greater than '/<-acre in s�ze, formal �i�etland delineation must be prepared in accordance �.��ith the current method required by the Co�ps. (See paragraph li(�); (iv)A written description of all land(including, if available, legal descriptions) o«�ned by the prospective perntittee and/or the prospective permittee's spouse, within a one nule radius of die parcel, in any form of owilership (including any land owned as a parmer, Coiporation,joint tenant, co-tenant, or as a tenant-by-the-entirety) and any land on which a purchase and sale agreement or other conhact for sale or pwchase has been executed; (10)For NWP 31 (Maintenance of Existing Flood Conhol Projects), the prospective permi�tee must either notify the District Engineer with a PCN prior to each maintenance activity or submit a five yeac(or less) maintenance plan. In addition, the PCN must include all of the following: (i) Sufficient baseline informatio�l identifying the approved channel depths and configurations and existing facilities. Minor deviations are authorized,provided the approved flood control protection or drainage is net increased; (ii) A delineation of any affected special aquatic sites, including wetlands; and, (iii)Location of the dredged material disposal site; (11) For NWP 33 (Temporary Construction, Access,and Dewatering), the PCN must also include a restoratio�l plan of ceasonable measures to avoid and minimize adverse effects to aquatic resources; (12)For NWPs 39,43 znd 44, tlie PCN must also include a written staiement to the District Engineer explaininc hoti�avoidance and nunimiza,fon for losses of waters of the US were achieved on the project site; (13) For NWP 39 and NWP 42, the PCN n�ust include a compe�lsarory mitigation pioposal to offset losses of waters of the US or justification explaining�vhy compensatory mitigation should not be required. For discharges chat cause the loss of greater than 300 linear feet of an intermittent stream bed, to be authorized, the District Engineer must deterrrune that the activiry complies «�ith the other ternu and conditions of the NWP, determ'.ne adverse environmental effects are minimal both individually and cumulatively, and ��aive the limitation on sheam impacts in writin�before the pernuttee may proceed; (14)For NWP 40(.Agricultura] Activities), the PCN must include a compensatoiy nuti�atioii proposa] to offset losses of�vaters of the US. This NWP does not authorize the relocation of greater than 300 linear-feet of existing serviceable drainage ditches constn�cted in non-tidal sneams unless, for drainage ditches consh ucted in internvttent non-tidal streams, the Distric*. Engineer ��zives this criterion in�vriting, and the Dishict Engineer has determined that the project complies ��ith all terms and conditionc oT this NWP, and that any adverse impac[s of the project on the aquatic environment are minimal, both individuall}�and cur.�ulatively; (1�) For NWP 43 (Storn��ater 1��ta�iaeement Facilitiesj, the PCN must include, for the const,vction oi��e�� storrn�i�ater management facilities, a maintenance plan (in accordance with state and local �equiren�ents, i� 4 -t'�;�li":b;ej ar�d a co;;�pe;�satorv mit;��at�o»p��posal to offset losses of��raters of the liS. For discharees that cause �i�; loss of�reater than �00 linear feet of an intermittent stream bed. to be authorized, the District Engineer n�ust deternvne that the activity comp]�es ��th the other terms and conditions of the ?��%p, determine ad��erse er��;ronmenta] effec_s are minimal both individually and cumulatively, and ��-aive the limitation on stream impacts �n ��riting before the pernvttee may proceed; (16) For;vWp 44 (Mining Actl��ities), the PCN must include a description of all u�aters of the US ad��ersely affected by tlle project, a descr�ption of ineasures taken to mininuze adverse effects to �.�-aters of the LJS, a uescnpnon of ineasures taken to comply ��.�ith the criteria of the NWp, and a reclamation p]an (for all agoregate m�nin� a:tivities in isolated ��aters and non-tida] ��etlands adjacent to head��aters and any hard rocl:/nuneral nuning acti��ities); (17)For activities that may adversely affect Federally-]isted endangered or threatened species, the PCN must include the name(s) of those endaneered or tlu�eatened species that may be affected by the proposed work or utilize the designated critical habitat that may be affected by the proposed�n�ork; and (1�)For activities that ;»ay affect historic properties !isted in, o;eligible for listi�ig in, the ivational Register of Histeric Places, the PCN must state «-hich historic property may be affected by the proposed ��ork or include a ��c;n�ty map indicating the location of the historic property. (c) Form of Nolifcatio�l: Tlle standard Individual Perm:t app]ication form(Form EI`TG 4345) may be used as the norifrcrrtiorr but must clearly indicate that it is a PCN and must include a]] of the informati of General Condition 13. A letter containing the requisite information may also be used. oil required in (b) (I)-(1 g) (d) District En,ineer's Decision: In revie��ing the PCN for the proposed activity, the District En�ineer ��i11 determine whether the activity authorized by the NWP �-i11 result in more than minimal individual orvcumulative adverse environmental effects or may be contrary to the public interest. The prospective perniittee may submit a proposed mitigation plan with the PCN to expedite the process. The District Engineer will consider any proposed compensatory mitigation tl�e applicant has included in the proposai in determining whether the net adverse environil�ental effects to tlie aquatic environment of tlle proposed«�ork are minimal. If the District Engineer determines that tlie activity complies with the terms and conditions of the N��P and that the adverse effects on the aquat�c env�ronment are minimal, after consideiing mitigation, the District Engineer will notify the permittee and �nclude ar,y conditions the District Engineer deems necessary. The District Engineer must approve any compensatory mitigation proposal before the pernuttee conunences«� �ubn�it a compensatory mitigation proposal with the PCN, tlle proposalrmayfbe eiptherp on eptua or detailed.uIf the� prospectrve pernuttee elects to submit a compensatory mitigation plan with the PCN, the District Engineer will expeditiously review the proposed compensarory mitigation plan. The District Engineer musi revie�v the plan��ithin 4� days of rece�ving a complete PCN and deternline ��hether the conceptual or specific proposed nutigation would ensure no more than minimal adverse effects on the aquatic environment. If the net adverse effects of the project on the aquatic environment(after consideration of the compensatory mitigation proposal) are determined by the District Eng�neer to be minimal, the District Engineer wi11 provide a timely written response to the applicant. The response '�+'ill state that the project can proceed under the terms and conditions of the NWp. If the District Engineer determines that the adverse effects of the proposed��ork are more than minimal, then :i�e Distiict Engineer will notify the applicant either. (1) that the project does not qualify for authorization under the -�'��P and instiuct the applicant on the procedures to seek authorization under an Individual PernLt; (2)that the projec± is authorized under tl�e NWP subject to the applicant's submission of a mitigation proposal that would reduce the adverse effects on the aquatic em�ironment to the minimal level; or(3)that the project is authorized under ;1�e NVb'P with specific modifications or conditions. Where the Dish ict Engineer determines that m:tigation is required to ensure no more than nunimal adverse effects occur to the aquatic environment, the activity will be authorized «�ithin the 45-day PCN period. The authorization will include the necessary conceptual or specific mitigation or a requiren�ent that the applicant submit a nutigation proposa] that would reduce the adverse effects on the aquatic environment to the nunimal level. \��hen conceptual mitigation is iticluded, or a nutigation lan is Ieqt>>ied �nder item(2) above, no «�ork in ��aters of the US wili occur until the District Engineer has a proved a specific m�tigation plan. . (e)A�encv Coor dination: The District Engineer��ill consider any comments from Federal and state a�encies concernir�g the proposed activity's compliance �vith the terms and conditions of the NWPs and the need for miti�,ation to reduce the project's adverse environmental effects to a minimal level. � ror act��nes �equiiii��,�urificatro�z to [h: [�;stiic� F�n�ineer that result in the loss of ,ie,,ier than '�_-acie o; ��aters of the US, ;he District En�ineer��-i11 pro�idz inunediately(e.g., �-ia facs�nule transm�ssion, overnight mail, o� other expeditious maruier)a copy to the appropriate Federal or state offices(USF�uS, stace narurai resource oi water quality agency, EPA, State Historic Preservation Officer(SHPO),and, if appropr�ate, the N1�QFS). W�th tlie exception of NWP;7, these agencies �ti-ill then have 10 calendar days from the d�te the mat�nal is transmitted to telephone or iax the Dishict Engineer notice that they intend to provide substantive, site-specific comments. If so contacted by an agency, the District Engineer ��ill �;�ait an additional 15 calendar days before making a decision on the,ionfca�ion. Th�District Engineer will fully consider agency comments received �vithin the specified time frame,but will provide no response to the resource agency,except as provided be]o��. The District Engineer will indicate in the administrative record associated with eacli ito�iJicn�ioit that the resource agencies'concerns were considered. As required by Section 305(b)(4)(B)of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Mana�ement Act, the Disrrict Engineer�v;ll provide a response to NMFS within 30 days of receipt of any Essential Fish }�abita[ conservation recommendations. Applicants are encouraned to provide the Coips nniltiple copies of,mrif,crr�in,ls t� expedite agency no�ificntion. (� Wetland Delineations: Wetland delineations must be prepared in accordance with the current method required by the Coips(For NWP 29 see para�raph(b)(9)(iii) for parcels less than '/<-acre in size). The permittee may ask the Cotps �o delineate the special aquatic site. There may be some delay if the Coips does ihe delineation. Furthennore, the 45-day period wil] not start until the wetland delineation has oeen completed and submitted to the Corps, �vhe:e appropriate. 14. Cornpliance Certi icaiion. Every permittee who has received NWP verification from the Co�ps will submit a signed certification regarding the completed work and any required nutigation. The certification will be forwarded by the Coips��ith the authorization letter and ti�ill include: (a)A statement that the authorized work ��as done fn accordance with the Corps authorization, including any general or specific conditions; (b) A statement that any required mitigation was completed in accordance with the permit conditions; and (c)The signature of the pernlittee certifying the completion of the work and mitigation. 15. Use ofMulriple Naria:wide Pernrits. The use of more than one NWP for a single and cocnplete project is prohibited, except when the acreage loss of waters of the US authorized by the NWPs does not exceed the acreage limit of die NWP with the hi�hest specified acreage limit(e.g. if a road crossing over tidal wat�rs is constructed under NWP 14, with associated baiilc stabilization authorized by NWP i 3, the maximum acreage loss of waters of tlie L1S for the total project cannot exceed 1/3-acre). 16. W��er Supplv Intakes. 1�ro activity, including swctures ana work in navigable waters of the US or discl�arges of dredged or fill material, may occur in the proximity of a public water supply intake except �vhere the activity is for repair of the public water supply intake structures or adjacent bank stabilization. 17. ShellTsh Beds•. No activity, including shvctures and work in navigable waters of the US or discharges of dredged or fill material, may occur in areas of concentrated shellfish populations, unless the activity is directly related to a shellfish harvesting activity authorized by NWP 4. I 8. Suitahle Material. No activity, including structures and work in navigable waters of the US or discharges of dredged or fill material, may consist of unsuitable material(e.g., trash, debris,car bodies,asphalt,etc.) and material used for conshuction or discharged must be free from toxic pollutants in toxic amounts(see Sectio� 307 of the C1�JA). 19. Mitigation. The Disn ict Engineer��ill consider tne iacrors discussed below�v11en deternuning the acceptability oi appropriate and practicable mitigation necessary to offset adverse effects on the aquatic environment that are more than nunimal. (a)The project must be designed znd conshucted to a��oid and minimize adverse effects to waters of the US to the maximum extent practicable at the project site (i.e., on site). (b) Mitigation in all its forms (avoiding, minimizing, rectifyin�, reducing or compensatingj will be required to the zxtent necessary to ensure that the adverse effects to the aquatic em�ironment are minimal. (c) Compensatory�TUtigation at a minimum one-for-one ratio �vill be required for all ��etland impacts requir[n�a PCN, unless the �isn ict Engineer determines it? �vriting that some other form of mitigation �.�-ould be more C . ��::c�iu;�e;n�lly appropriate and pro�ides a pro�ect-specific �,a��zr of this requ�rement. Consistent ��j]� \ahonal policy°, the District Ene�neer ��11 establish a preference for restoration of„-etlands as compensatory mitieation. n�t}� preser��ation used only in exceptional circumstances. (d)Compensatory nutieation(i e., replacement or substituhon of aquatic resources for those impacted) wi11 not be used to increase the acrea�e losses allowed by the acreaoe limits of some of the NWPs. For example, '/.-acre of �t�etlands cannot be created to change a '/<-acre loss of wetlands to a '/�-acre loss associated w�th NWP ;9 verification. Ho�vever, %z-acre of created «�etlands can be used to reduce the impacts of a !!-acre !ess of wetlands to ti�e minimum impac?]evel in order to meet the minimal impact requirement associated ��-ith ;�'��l�pS. (e)To be practicable, the mitioation must be available and capable of being done considering costs, existing technology, and log�stics in ]ight of the overall project purposes. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining�;�etland or upland vegetated buffers to protect open��aters such as streams;and replacing]osses of aquatic resource functions and values by creatin�, restoring, enhancine, or preserving similar functions and val��es,preferably in the same ��atershed. (� Compensatory mitigation plans for projects in or near streams or other open��aters will normally include a requirement for the establishment, maintenance,and]egal protection e. buffers to open�vaters. In man cases, veg � y�> easements, deed restrictions) of vegetated Y etated buffers will be t}ie onl compensatory mitigation required. Vegetated buffers should consist of native species. The widtti of the ve�eta te d bu f fers required will address documented water quality or aquatic habitat loss concerns. Normally, the vegetated buffer�vill be 2S io �0 feet wide on each side of the stream, but the District Engineers may require slightly H�ider vegetated buffers to address documented water quality or habitat loss concerns. Where both wetlands and open waters eaist on tl�e project site, tlie Corps �i�ill determine the appropriate compensatory mitigation(c.g.,stream buffers or wetlands compensation) based o�i what is best for the aquatic environment on a watershed basis. In cases where vegetated buffers are determined to be the most appropriate form of compensatory mitigation,the District Engineer may waive or reduce the requirement to provi�e wetland compensatory mitigation for wetland impacts. (�) Compensatory miti�ation proposais submitted with the "notificaiio,:"may be either conceptual or detailed. If conceptual p]ans are approved under tl�e ��erification, then the Corps wil]condition the verification to require detailed plans be siibmitted and approved by the Corps prior to construction of the authorized activity in waters of the US. (h) Permittees may propose the use of mitigation banks, in-lieu fee arrangements or separate activity-specific compensatory mitigation. In all cases that require compensatory mitigation, the mitigation provisions wi11 specify fhe party responsible for accomplishing and/or complying �i�ith the mitigation plan. 20. Snrnv�:ir_ 2Q Ar�as. Activities, including structures and��ork in navigable waters of the liS or discharges of dred�ed or fill material, in spaw.n�ng areas during spawning seasons must be avoided to the maximum extent piacticable. Activities that result in the physical destruction (e.g., excavate, fill, or smother do�vnstream by substantial turbidity)of an important spa�ming area are not authorized. 21. Manu_Qen� i�nt of Water Flows. To the maximum extent practicable,the activity must be desi�ned to maintain preconstruction downstream flo�v conditions(e.g.,]ocation, capacity,and flow rates). Furthermore, the activity must not permanently restrict or impede the passage of normal or expected high flows(unless the primary purpose of t]�e fill is to impound waters)and tl�e structure or discl�arge of dredged or fil]material must withstand expected high flo�vs. The activity must, to the maxin�um extent practicable,provide for retainin�excess flo«�s from the site, prov;de for maintaining surface flo�v rates from the site similar to preconstruction conditions, and provid:� for not increasing�-ater flo«�s from the project site, relocating water,or redirecting water flo«�beyond preconshuction conditions. Stream channelizing��i11 be reduced to the minimal amount necessary, and the activity must, to the maximum extent practicable,reduce adverse effects such as flooding or erosion do�mstream and upstream of the project site, �nless the activity is part of a larger system designed to manage��ater flou�s. In most ca;es, it «�ill not be a requirement to conduct detailed studies and monitoring of water flo�v. This condition is only applicable to projects that have the potential to affect waterflows. W]lile appIOpriate measures must be taken, it is not necessary to conduct detailed studies to identify such measures or require monitoring to ensure their effectiveness. I�TOrmally,the Corps ��i11 defer to state and local authorities re�ardin; manage�nent of�a�ater flon�. 7 ?2 3�,��se Ei(ects From I�npo�u��inre>>i�_ If the acti��iry ,icates an impound�nent of��ater, adveise eff�cts to the ayuatic s�stem due ro the acceleranon of the passage of��.ater; andior rhe resnicnng its flo�� shall be minimized ro the maximum extent practicable. This includes shuctln es and «<ork m na�•igable ��•aters of the US,or d�scharoes of dredged or fill material. .. ?;. N%nte,(o�,�!Breediri firens. Acuvities, including snvctures and n�ork �n na��i�able ��a[ers of the US or discharges of dred�ed or fill material, into breeding areas �or migratory��aterfo�vl must be avoided to ;he maximum extent practicable. 24. Re�,roval o(TemUO�•arv Fills. Any temporary fills must be removed in thei*entirety and the affected areas returned ro their preexisting elevation. ?�. Desipiinted Crilical Resotn�ce li�nters. Critical resource ��aters include, NOAA-desi�nated marine sanctuaries, National Estuarine Research Reserves, National Wild and Scenic Rivers, critical habitat for Federally listed tiveatened and endangered species,coral reefs,state natural l�eritage sites, and outstanding national resource ��aiers or other�vaters officially designated by a state as having particular environmental or ecological significance and identified by the District Engineer after notice and opportunity for public comment. The District Engineer may also designate additional critical resource �raters after notice and opportunity for conunent. (a) Except as noted below, discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the US are not authorized by '��'✓YS �, 12> 14, 1b, 17, 21>29,31,3�,39,40,42,43,and 44 for any activity within, or directly affecting, critical resource �vaters, including wetlands adjacent to such waters. Discharges of dredged or fill materials into waters of [he US may be authorized by the above N��✓Ps in National Wild and Scenic Rivers if the activity complies with Genera] Condition 7. Further, such discharges may be authorized in designated critical habitat for Federally listed threatened or endangered species if the activity complies with General Condition 1 1 and the USFWS or the '1MFS has concurred in a deternunation of compliance with this condition. (b) For i�IWPs 3, 8, ]0, 13, 15, 18, ]9,22, 23, 2�, 27, 28, 30,33, 34, 36, 37,and 38,nolification is required in accordance with General Condition 13, for any activity proposed in the designated critical resource waters including ��etlands adjacent to those waters. The District Engineer may authorize activities under these NWPs onlv aftei it is determined that the impacts to the critical resource waters will be no more than minimal. � 26. Fills {4'ilhiri 1 DO-}'eQr Floodplains. For pucposes of this General Condition, 100-year floo�plains will be �dent�fied ttuough the eaisting Federal Emergency Management Agency's(FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA-appro��ed local floodplain maps. (a)Dischar�es in Floodplairr Below Headwaters. Discharges of dredged or fill material into �vaters of the US �vithin the mapped 100-year floodplain, below headwaters(i.e. five cfs),resulting in permanent above-grade fills, are no[ authorized by NWps 39;40,42,43,and 44. (b) Discharoes in Floodwav:Above Head��aters. Dischar�es of dredged or fill material into"�aters of tlle US within the FEMA or locally mapped floodway, resulting in permanent above-grade fills,are not authorized by NWPs 39,40,42,and 44. (c) The permittee must comply��ith any applicable FEMA-approved state or local floodplain management requirements. Z i. Consrrrrcrion Period For activities that have not been verified by the Coips a�:d the project was conunenced or under contract to commence by the expiration date of the NWP (or modification or revocation date), the n�ork must be completed �vithin 12-months after such date(including any modification that affects the project). Por acti��ities that have been verified and the project �vas commenced or under contract to commence within the ��erification period, the work must be completed by the date determined by the Corps. For projects that liave been verified by the Co►ps, an extensioii of a Coips approved completio�i date may requested. This request must be submitted at least one month before the previously approved completion date S J �11"I�l(;A"I,1O\� SI'I��(�I.�L C�O'�D1T1O��S Grading and Impletnentation l. The pennittec shall ensure that the restoration and enhancement desi�n and implementation adheres to the proposed grading and planting scheme submitted to the Coips (see Figures 7-1 1, Enclosure 1). 2. Restoration and enhancement shall be completed within the first growin� season after installation of the sewer line. Vegetation 3. Coverage of planted woody species or naturally recruited, native �voody species shall be at least 60% by the fifth year following construction in scrub-shrub and forested portions of the enhancement site. 4. Coverage by native emergent species shall be at least 80% by the fi fth year following the planting in herbacious portions of the enhancement site. �. Vegetative monitoring will be conducted using line-intercept, quadrat, or other appropriate methodology, depending on site conditions. The pern�ittee shall specify the methodology used during the site inspection. The same methodology shall be used throughout the monitoring period. 6. All sampling locations shall be clearly identified on 8.5 by 1 l-inch drawings and included in the annual monitorin� report. 7. Invasive, non-native species shall not exceed l 5% coverage at any time during the monitoring period. 8. The permittee shall establish a minimum of three fixed photo documentation locations to provide a visual record of structural changes during the monitoring period. Each photo documentation location shall be clearly identified on 8.5 by 1 1-inch drawinss and submitted in each annual monitoring report. Monitoring 9. An as-built report of the enhancement site shall be submitted to the Corps �vithin 60 days of completion of grading and planting. This report sliall include photographs taken before and after grading of the site, planting, or other substantial activities. 10. Monitoring shall begin imnrediately after the planting has been accomplished and continue for a period of 5 years. The monitoring period -�.vill start when the permittee has demonstrated that i�litial plantings have been accomplished. The monitoring period may be extended if sttccess criteria are not achieved. 1 1. Monitoring shall take place between April — June of each year. 12. An annual monitoring report that summarizes the above documentation shall be submitted to the Co1ps by September 30 of each monitoring year. This monitoring report will document the vegetation and the hydrology of the enhancement area. The monitoring report will include, but not be limited to: a. Perniit number and Name of pern�ittee; b. Project nat�le and location; c. Vegetatio�i monitoring data (i.e. plant counts); k�t c.Q �-' , d. Photo dc�cumentation of the enhancement site: e. Locations of sample collection point or transects; f. Visual obsen�ations of the enhancement site, including obser��ations on invasive/noxious plant growth within the wetland mitigation and buffer area and wildlife usage of the arca; and g. Description of all activities that have occurred on the project site during the previous monitoring year. 13 The monitoring report will also include an analysis of the enhancement area and a detern�ination as to whether the wetlands are achieving success criteria. 14. Annual monitoring reports shall be submitted to: U.S. Anny Corps of Engineers Regulatory Bi-anch (CENWP-OP-G) Compliance & Enforcement (Washington Co�inty— Coips ID No. 200300241} P.O. Box 2946 Portland, Oregon 97208 Contingencies 15. In the event that mitigation success criteria are not met during the monitoring period, the permitiee shall submit a contingency plan to the Corps. The contingency p)an shall be approved by the Corps prior to implementation. Oregon Depart►i�ent of Environmental Qualitv Conditions for Compliance with Section 401 of the C1ean�VVater Act ]. Turbidity/Erosion Controls- The permittee shall ensure the authorized �vork does not cause the turbidiry of affected waters to exceed ]0% over natural background turbidity 100 feet downstream from the activity causing the turbidity. For projects proposed in areas with no discernible gradient break (gradient of 2% or less), monitoring must be done at 4 hour intervals and the turbidity standard may be exceeded for a maximum of one monitoring interval per 24 hour work period provided all practicable control measures have been implemented. This turbidity standard exceedance interval applies only to coastal lo��lands and floodplains, valley bottoms and other low-lying and/or relatively flat land. For projects in al] other areas, the turbidity standard may be exceeded for a maximum of 2 hours (limited duration) provided all practicable erosion control measures have been implemented. Turbidity must be monitored during acti��e in-water ��ork periods. Monitoring points must be at an undisturbed site (representative background) 100 feet upstream from the turbidity causing activity (i.e., fill or discharge poin[), 100 feet downstream from the fill point, and at the point of fill. A turbidimeter is recommended, however, visual gauging is acceptable. Turbidity that is visible over background is considered to exceed the standard. Practicable erosion control measures must be implemented. Such measures must include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Place fill in the water using methods that avoid disturbance to the maximum practicable extent (e.g. placing fill with a machine rather than end-dumping from a truck). b. Prevent all construction materials and debris from entering waterway; c. Use filter bags, sediment fences, sediment traps or catch basins, silt curtains, leave strips or berms,Jersey barriers, sand bags, or other measures suf�cient to prevent movement of soil; d. Use impervious materials to cover stockpiles when unattended or during rain event; e. Erosion control measures shal] be inspected and maintained daily to ensure their continued effectiveness; f. No heavy machinery in a wetland or other water�vay; g. Use a grave] staging area and construction access; h. Fence off planted areas to protect from disturbance and/or erosion; and i. Flag or fence off wetlands adjacent to the construction area. Turbidity must be measured (or visually assessed)and recorded at the designated monitoring interval prescribed above during periods of acti��e construction. The designated person attending the monitoring equipment shall be responsible for notifying the project foreman of any exceedance of the turbiditv standard. If a 10°�a exceedance of the background level occurs at 100 feet below the project site, modify the activity causing the problem and continue to monitor at the proper inter�al. If exceedances occur with ri��o consecutive measurements the activity causing the turbidity must be stopped until the problem is resolved. �n c,Q 5 v ? In-��'ater �1%ork Periods- Al] �n-��ater work, �ncluding temporary fills or structures, may be undertaken only dunng the t�me per�ods recommended by Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) for in-water work specified in the most current version of O,-Pgrn� G7l1lIPIZl1pt' nr Timi�lg�l�r-WntPr Wnrk tn pr�tPr�� Fish �md I3�ildlife RPCn nr�t, An exception is allowed only with specific approval from the USACE after consultation with ODFW or National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). On tribal lands, the USACE will coordinate exceptions with the U.S. Environmental Agency (LJSEPA). 3. Riparian Vegetation Protection and Restoration- Riparian, wetland, and shoreline vegetation in the project area must be protected from disturbance to the maximum extent possible and be restored and enhanced when unavoidably disturbed due to activities associated ��ith the authorized work. All damaged or destroyed vegetation must be replaced with native plant materials. The standard for success is 75°/o areal coverage after the fifth growing season for native plant species that replace the habitat type lost or damaged. Planted areas must be temporarily fenced, or otherwise protected from damage, until the vegetation is established. Project sites must be revegetated to the extent possible up to the bankfull stage or line of non- aquatic vegetation, whichever is greater. When any wetland areas are adversely affected, revegetation must extend to the upland limits of the wetland area. 4. Stormwater- Stormwater from any authorized activity,conveyed or discharged to a water of the state, must be treated by a facility specifically designed to remove stormwater contaminants before entering streams, wetlands, or other waters of the state, including mitigation wetlands, so as to minimize pollutants entering those water bodies. S. Bank Stabilization- The linear [hreshold for bank stabilization projects under any nationwide is 250 feet. All projects exceeding the threshold require individual water quality certification. a. Bioengineering is required: Native plantings, such as willow saplings, must be incorporated into stream bank stabilization structures in order to pro��ide bank erosion protection, variable habitat for wildlife, and shade. [See the Division of State Lands C_:uidPlinPS nn Rinarian RPC�nra�inn� RinPng'll1P�� included in their 1996 Erosion Control General Authorization.] b. The project must not include retaining walls, bulkheads, gabions or similar vertical structures. r r �01T1p]1allCe C(rtlfjC�t1017 Project Count� : /� �;: �/ '"A ��—� . /`-' ��-C C.G�� , ✓ Permit :�'umber: �.% 3 :� .�� -„ C"-�� , C'�� , nate of Issuance: �\�arne of Permittee: I hereby certify that the �i�ork authorized by the abo��e referenced �ermi «►l�pleted in accurdatl�e ��th the terms and conditions of the said pern�it an ►•e uired mitig � I t, has f�een q ation «�as com leted in accordance �v�th the permit conditions �`hat described belo«�. ' � pt as Si�nature of Perrnittee Encl 6 1 NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE, IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. CITY OF TIGARO �'ommunity�DeueCvpment CITY OF TIGARD s��'�A�etterCommunity PUBLIC HEARING HOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEETING ON WEDNESDAY OCTOBER 15. 2003 AT 1:00 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER AT 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO.: SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 2003-00009 FILE TITLE: HALL BOULEVARD CULVERT EXTENSION APPLICANT: City of Tigard OWNER: City of Tigard Attn: Vannie Nguyen 13125 SW Hall Boulevard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: The City of Tigard is seeking Sensitive Lands Review approval to extend a stormwater outfall into the floodway alon Fanno Creek. The outFall would serve to convey treated stormwater from the wa�er quality facility to the waterway. LOCATION: 13360 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 2S102DA, Tax Lot 600. ZONE: R-12: Medium-Density Residential District. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.510, 18.775 and 18.790. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.390 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURES ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 2438 (VOICE) OR (503) 684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE HEARINGS OFFICER MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION LcSS THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING, ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. A REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE MADE ONLY AT THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING (ORS 197.763(6). INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST ACCOMPANIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY AN OPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO THE ISSUE PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25G) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25�) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER BRAD KILBY AT (503) 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223, OR BY E-MAIL TO bradley@ci.tigard.or.us. _ - ; -- - ---- . - . YICINITY MAP BURNHAM —_______= SLR2003-00009 HALL BOUIEVARD CULVERT EXTENSION �;� � \ ! ,. P o ��.�� ,� '\ \ ->- � �\\\� ,: ?j P �� ,�. ��= � ��;�� -. _ , .� �.. .., .� :��` ,�t � ..� �., � ; -- ��\�� mom� � �� ;�\\�, �� \\\\\�� rro.ew+ws � . .� � �� N 0'MAR o ,� � .�F.�, ,•,�,;�� J � Q City of Tigard S Mtanvlm On iMS ma0 b lu Ba�'al�acNqn dV1'W tl10YN M ve�lhlA��1111 YI!LM�e�ODnw�SerVKm M�ffU�. 1]1255W WIBM Tlpard.OR 9)3l� �SO]leaw�lt MpJ/www.tl.tl�prtl.a.u� M y REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITYOFTIOARD Community�DeveCopment S(aping�l BetterCommunity DATE: Se ptember 17,2003 T0: Matt Stine,Urban Forester/Public Works Annex FROM: Cii�of Ti9ard Plannin9 Division STAFF CONTACT: Brad IGlby,Associate Planner[x24341 Phone: [5031639-41T1/Fax: [5031684-1291 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW[SLRI 2003-00009 ➢ HALL BOULEVARD CULVERT El(TENSION� REQUEST: The City of Tigard is seeking Sensitive Lands Review approval to extend a stormwater outFall into the floodway along Fanno Creek. The outFall would serve to convey treated stormwater from the water quality facility to the waterway. LOCATION: 13360 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 2S102DA, Tax Lot 600. ZONE: R-12: Medium-Density Residential District. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.510, 18.775 and 18.790. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement/Plans for your review. From information supplied by various,departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 1 2003. You may use the space provided be ow or a ac a separa e e er o re urn your commen s. ou are unable to res ond b the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments an con irm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: � We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enc ose e er. � Written comments provided below: Name & Number of Person(s) Commenting: � 5�� , REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITYOFTIf3ARD �'ommunity�Development S(apingA BetterCommunity DATE: Se ptember 1I,2003 D L� C� � Od � T0: lee Walker,CleanWater Services/SWM Program SEP 1 8 2003 FROM: City of Ti9ard Planning Diuision By STAFF CONTACT: Brad Kilby,Associate Planner[x24341 Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-7297 SENSlT!!lE:.R!!DS REVlEIN[SLRD 2003-00009 r NALL BOULEVARD CULVERT EKTENSION� REQUEST: The City of Tigard is seeking Sensitive Lands Review approval to extend a stormwater outfall into the floodway along Fanno Creek. The outfall would serve to convey treated stormwater from the water quality facility to the waterway. LOCATION: 13360 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 2S102DA, Tax Lot 600. ZONE: R-12: Medium-Density Residential District. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.510, 18.775 and 18.790. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement/Plans for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 1 2003. You may use the space provided be ow or a ac a separa e e er o re urn your commen s. ou are unable to res ond b the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments an con irm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: _ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Piease refer to the enc ose ie er. �' Written comments provided below: ° J� :,,i.��6�2 lcM,vlaC�.�..�1 �L��'c.�1L�cxGClr I�CJrn�4 r �c��ur.J�.�� -� �'Y\!J�/�C �AM�P �1�.(/Y�(/' AO _Aw�.nnnti,� .� - � p C / � G « �,,,.7�'i1��,��a.,..�� '�.,�-6.�..,��,.�,., 5��,..��..� ��?�'C> �3-1l) Name & Number of Person(s) Commenting: � � ��_� . f REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITYOFTIGARD Community�Development S(:apingA�detterCammunity DATE: Se ptember 17,2003 T0: IGm McMillan,Deuelopment Reuiew Engineer FROM: Cit]I of Tigard Planning Di�ision STAFF CONTACT: Brad Kilby,Associate Planner[x24341 Phone: [5031639-4111/fax: [5031684-129) SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW[SLR12003-00009 ➢ HALL BOULEVARD CULVERT ENTENSION Q REQUEST: The City of Tigard is seeking Sensitive Lands Review approval to extend a stormwater outfall into the floodway along Fanno Creek. The outfall would serve to convey treated stormwater from the water quality facility to the waterway. LOCATION: 13360 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 2S102DA, Tax Lot 600. ZONE: R-12: Medium-Density Residential District. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.510, 18.775 and 18.790. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement/Plans for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agenaes and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 1 2003. You may use the space provided be ow or a ac a separa e e er o return your commen s. ou are unable to res ond b the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments an con irm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: _ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enc ose e er. = Written comments provided below: b10 �tF��_�.z��r ��e-r n�G � t- z "a� Name & Number of Person(s) Commenting: �ASH CO LAND DEV. Fax�503-846-2908 Sep 19 2003 16�49 P.01 WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON � ��•�.� �epartment of Land Use and Transportsticn,Land Devebpment SeNiCes � 155 North First Avenue�Suit!350-13�HiIlsDOro.Oregon 97124 (503)$46-5761 �FAX:(S03)84Fr2808 September 19, 2003 Brad Kilby City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Tigard, OR 97223 Fax No. 503-884-7297 No. of Pages: 1 RE: Hall Boulevard Culvert Extension City File Number: SLR 2003-00009 Tax Map and Lot Number: 2S102DA Lot 600 Lacation: 13360 SW Hall Boulevard Applicant; City of Tigard Owner: City of Tigard / � o�A.oveoo Washingtvn County Department of Land Use and Transportat�on has received notice o� the above noted application but will not be submitting any requirements/conditions. The project site is not adjacent to County-maintained road sections, nor is it expected to generate considerable off-site impacts to our nearby roaciways. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. If you have any questions, please contact me at 503-846-8131. �� / �� Phil Healy ` Senio�Planne� F:l3hared1LDS1W PSHAREITRANSPW OCOMM.doc � � REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITYOFTIGARD �'ommunity�UeveCopment S(apingA Better Community DATE: Se ptemqer 11,2003 T0: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigartl Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Brad Kilby,Associate Planner[x24341 Phone: [5031639-41n/Fax: [5031684-1291 SENSITIVE LANDS REYIEW[SLRI 2003-00009 ➢ HALL BOULEVARD CULVERT EKTENSION� REQUEST: The City of Tigard is seeking Sensitive Lands Review approval to extend a stormwater outFall into the floodway along Fanno Creek. The outfall would serve to convey treated stormwater from the water quality facility to the waterway. LOCATION: 13360 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 2S102DA, Tax Lot 600. ZONE: R-12: Medium-Density Residential District. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.510, 18.775 and 18.790. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement/Plans for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 1 2003. You may use the space provided be ow or a ac a separa e e er o re urn your commen s. ou are unable to res ond b the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments an con irm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: _ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enc ose e er. = Written comments provided below: Name & Number of Person(s) Commenting: CITY � TIGARD REQUEST FOR C01 ENTS � � NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS � �, FILE NOS.: ' t,_ ,�;�;��,��,^ FILE NAME: �� ' ��.��- �1��:� �`� �. CITIZEN INYOLVEMENT TEAMS � 14-DAY PENDING APPLICATION NOTICE TO CIT AREA: ❑Central QEast �South ❑West �Proposal Descrip.in Library CIT Book CITY OFFICES _LONG RANGE PLANNING/Barbara Shields,Planning Mgr. �OMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPTJPIanning-Engineering Techs. POLICE DEPTJJim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer _BUILDING DNISION/Gary Lampella,Building Official NGINEERING DEPTJKim McMillan,Dvlpmnt.Review Engineer_ ATER DEPT./Dennis Kcellermeier,Public Wortcs Mgr. CITY ADMINIS7RATION/Cathy Wheatley,City Recorder yPUBLIC WORKS/John Roy,Property Manager �UBLIC WORKS/Matt Stine,Urban Forester �PLANNER—POST PROJECT SITE IF A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM-10 BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING! SPECIAL DISTRICTS TUAL.HILLS PARK 8 REC.DIST.+► TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE# _ TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT#� S CLEANWATER SERVICES� Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Lee Walker/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N.First Avenue Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97724 LOCAL AND STATE IURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON #� _ CITY OF TUALATIN � �OR.DEPT.OF FISH 8 WILDLIFE OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS _ Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue Jennifer Goodridge _ Irish Bunnell,DevebqnerM Services 18880 SW Martinaui Avenue PO Box 59 775 Summer Street NE PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Salem,OR 97301-1279 Beaverton,OR 97076 _ OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE 8�PLANNING� _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.8 MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE _ CITY OF DURHAM � 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 SaJem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland.OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 / PO Box 23483 _ Bob Knight,DataResaurceCerxar(ZCA) ��S ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 _ Paulette Allen,c�owu,Me�e�„eMCooro+�o. OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.B DVLP. Kathryn Harris el Huie,GreenspxesCoordinator(CPA20A� LBff)I FfQf1CF1(Comp.PlanAmertlmerrtsOnly) Routing CENWP-OP-G CITY OF KING CITY� �ennifer Budhabhatti,RepionalPlarv�(Wetlantls) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 PO Box 2946 City Manager _ C.D.Manager,c�nMa��seN� Salem,OR 97301-2540 Portland,OR 97208-2946 15300 SW 116th Avenue King City,OR 97224 WASHINGTON COUNTY� _ OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY cPOwedmes innrea) _OR.DEPT OF AVIATION cMOnopowTo.�en1 Dept.of Land Use 8 Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Tom Highland,P�:,u 155 N.First Avenue CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO� Routing TTRC—Attn: Renae Ferrera 3040 25th Street,SE Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 5alem,OR 97310 Hillsboro.OR 97124 PO Box 369 P rtland,OR 97208-3621 Brent Curtis tcPn> Lake Oswego,OR 97034 � _Gregg Leion ccPn� OR.�EPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) 10D0T,REGION 1 � Anne LaMountain��cauRa� CITY OF PORTLAND (NOtify for WetWnds aM Paterrtial EnvirorxnerRal Impxts) ��Marah Danielson,oe�oo�n ae��ew coob�or P ii Heaty ocnn,Re� Planning Bureau Director Regional Administrator Carl Toland, Right-of-Way Section N�b�� eve Conwaycce�a�.� 1900 SW 4'"Avenue,Suite 4100 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders Sr.Cartographer,oP�au,�,. Portland,OR 97201 Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 Jim Nims czcn�Ms�s _Doria Mateja tzcn>Ms�a WA.CO.CONSOLIDATED COMMUNIC.AGENCY(WCCCA)"911"(MOnopoN Town) ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A� Dave Austin Jane Estes,P«��sv�� PO Box 6375 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350 Beaverton,OR 97007-0375 Portland,OR 97221-2414 UTILITY PROYIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Bunington Northern�Santa Fe R/R Predecessor) Robert I.Melbo,President&General Manager 110 W. 10th Avenue Albany,OR 97321 SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS COMCAST CABLE CORP. _TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer tn�.aw�o�y> Randy Bice ,5..��,w..��, (If ProjeU is WRhn%Mile of a TransR RoUe) 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Ben Baldwin,Project Planner PoRland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland,OR 97232 PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY VERIZON QWEST COMMUNICATIONS Ken Gutierrez,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord. Ken Perdue,Engineering Patty Stambaugh,Engineering 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue PO Box 1100 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonviile,OR 97070 Portland.OR 97209-3991 Beaverton,OR 97075-1100 Portland,OR 97219 TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 COMCAST CABLE CORP. COMCAST CABLE CORP. Marsha Butler,Administrative Offices Jan Youngquist,Demographics Alex Silantiev,5..�.��.N..o��n Diana Carpenter c�.Ew�.�N«�w, 6960 SW Sandburg Street 16550 SW Merlo Road 9605 SW Nimbus Avenue,Bldg.12 3500 SW Bond 5treet Tigard,OR 97223-8039 Beaverto�,OR 97006-5152 Beaverton,OR 97008 Portland,OR 97232 +IF INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN 500'OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANY/ALL CITT PROJECTS(Project Planner Is Responsibie Fo►Indicating Parties To Notify). n:�patty�mastersu2equest For Comments Nour�cation�ist.doc (UPDATED: 17-Ju1-03) (Also updale:"i:lcurpinlsetupVahels�annexation_utilities and franchises.doc"when updating lhis document) AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITYOFTIGARD Corriuuniity•Uzz,elopn�e�tt Sfiaping�BetterCommuriity I, �Patricia L. Lunsforrl, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a SeniorAdministrativeSpeciaC�rtfor the �'ity of7'igard'WashingtonCounty, Oregonand that I served the following: {Check Appropnate Box(s)Below� � NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR:� iLR2003-00009/HALL BOULEVARD CULYERT E%TENSION _ � AMENDED NOTICE (File No.lName Reference) HEARING BODY: HEARING DATE: ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director � Tigard Hearings Officer (October 15, 2003) ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhiblt"A",and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhlblt"B",and by reference made a part hereof, on OCtObC�16,2003,and deposited in the United States Mail on October 16,2003, postage prepaid. � ` �`-� (Person th par otic ,57A7E O�F'O�GON � County of`Wasj:ngton )ss. Ci�y of�igard � Subscribed and sworn/affi ed before me on the �day of DI/ , 2003. •,o OFFICIAL SEAL /� 4r,F-'Y�'... /�' I . �: . ;b J BENGTSON '`` NOTARY PUBLIC•OREGON COMMISSION N0.368086 c MY C�MMISSION EXPIRES APR.27,2007 Nh�Commission Expires: � � Ek, ,�BIT� I 20 DAYS = N/A CITY OF TIOARD DATE OF FILING: 10/16/2003 Community�DeveCopment S�apingA BetterCommunity CITY OF TIGARD `(NasFiington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER Case Numbers: SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW SLR 2003-00009 Case Name: HALL BOULEVARD CULVERT EXTENSION Name of Owner: Cit of Ti ard Attn: Vannie N u en Name of Applicant: Same as Owner Address of Applicant: 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Ti ard Ore on 97223 Address of Property: 13360 SW Hall Bouleverd Ti ard Ore on 97223 Tax Ma /Lot Nos.: Washin ton Co. Tax Assessor's Ma No. 2S102DA, Tax Lot 600. A FINAL ORDER INfORPORATING THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND �ONCLUSIONS APPROVING A REQUEST FOR SENSITIVE LANDS REYIEW. THE LITY OF TIGARD HEARINGS OfFICER HAS REYIEWED THE APPLIfANTS PLANS, NARRATIYE, MATERIALS, (OMMENTS OF REVIEWING AGEN[IES, THE PIANNING DIYISION'S STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE APPLIfATION DESCRIBEO IN fURTHER DETAII IN THE STAFF REPORT. THE HEARINGS OFFIfER NELD A PUBLIC HEARING ON OCTOBER 15. 2003 TO REfEIYE TESTIMONY REGARDING THIS APPLI(ATION. TNIS DEfISION NAS BEEN BASED ON THE fACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS LONTAINED WITHIN THIS FINAL ORDER Request: ➢ The City of Tigard requested Sensitive Lands Review approval to extend a stormwater outfall into the floodway along Fanno Creek. The outfall would serve to convey treated stormwater from the water quality facility to the waterway. At the close of the record, the Hearings Officer conditionally approved the application subject to the conditions of approval in the Staff Report, except recommended Condition of Approval No. 1 because the applicant submitted proof that the Oregon Division of State Lands (ODSL) had app�oved the application for the project. Zone: R-12: Medium-Densiry Residential District. Applicable Review Criteria: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.510, 18.775 and 18.790. Action: ➢ ❑ Approval as Requested � Approval with Conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper and mailed to: 0 Owners of Record Within the Required Distance O Affected Government Agencies � Area Citizen Involvement Team � The Applicants and Owners The adopted findings of fact and decision can be obtained from the Planning Division/Community Development Department at the City of Tigard City Hall. Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON OCTOBER 16, 2003 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON OCTOBER 31, 2003 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The decision of the Review Authority is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON OCTOBER 30, 2003. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON Regarding an application by the City of Tigard ) F I N A L O R D E R for Sensitive Lands Review for a stormwater ) outfall in the floodway along Fanno Creek at ) SLR 2003-00009 13360 SW Hall Boulevard in the City of Tigard ) (Hall Boulevard Culvert) A. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 1. This final order concerns an application by the City of Tigard(the "applicant") for Sensitive Lands Review for a stormwater outfall in the floodway along Fanno Creek at 13360 SW Hall Boulevard; also known as tax lot 600, WCTM 2S 102DA (the "site"). The outfall will discharge treated stormwater into the creek from a water quality facility near SW Hall Boulevard. The applicant is widening Hall Boulevard in the vicinity of the site. The applicant will consttuct a stormwater facility to collect, treat and discharge stormwater runoff from the street into Fanno Creek. The outfall for the stormwater facility will be in the 100-year flood plain; therefore a Sensitive Lands Review is required. 2. Tigard Hearings Officer Larry Epstein (the "hearings officer") held a duly noticed public hearing on October 15, 2003 to receive and consider public testimony in this matter. At the beginrung of the hearing, the hearings officer made the declaration required by ORS 197.763. The hearings officer disclaimed any ex parte contacts, bias or conflicts of interest. City planning manager Dick Bewersdorff recommended approval, subject to conditions. See the Staff Report dated October 2, 2003 (the Staff Report). He recommended the hearings officer delete condition of approval 1, because the applicant submitted proof that ODSL had approved the application for the project. On behalf of the applicant, Vannie Nguyen and Marlin DeHaas accepted the staff recommendations and conditions and waived the applicant's right to have the record held open for final argument. Other than relevant service providers and public agency staff,no one testified orally or in writing. The hearings officer closed the record at the conclusion of the hearing. 3.T'he hearings officer agrees with the findings,conclusions and conditions in the Staff Report,except condition of approval 1, and he adopts them as his own. Condition of approval should be deleted, because it is moot. 4. The hearings officer concludes that this Sensitive Lands Review application dces or can comply with the relevant standards and criteria of the Tigard CDC as provided in this Final Order,provided the application is subject to conditions of approval that ensure finals plans and certain other information are provided and found sufficient by the City in a timely manner and that subsequent development will comply with applicable CDC standards and criteria. Therefore the application should be approved subject to such conditions. B. DECISION Based on the findings and conclusions herein,the hearings officer hereby approves SLR 2003-00009, subject to the conditions of approval in the Staff Report, except recommended condition of approval no. 1 is hereby deleted,. A this 16th of Oct ber, 2003. Epste AIC City of T' ar He ngs Officer Agenda Item: 2.2 Hearin Date: October 15 2003 Time: 7:00 PM STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER CITYOFTIGARD Community�DeveCopment FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ShupingA�detterCommunity 120 DAYS = 12/3112003 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: HALL BLVD. CULVERT EXTENSION CASE NO: Sensitive Lands Review (SLR) SLR2003-00009 OWNER/ City of Tigard APPLICANT: Attn: Vannie Nguyen 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested approval to extend a stormwater outfall into the floodway along Fanno Creek. The outfall would serve to convey treated stormwater from the water quality facility to the waterway. The water quality facility receives the excess runoff created from the Hall Blvd. Half street improvement. LOCATION: 13360 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 2S102DA, Tax Lot 600. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN and Z�NING DESIGNATION: R-12; Medium Density Residential: The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.390, 18.510, 18.775, and 18.790 SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Hearings Officer find that the proposed Site Development Review, Sensitive Lands, and Water Resources Overlay Review will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City and meets the Approval Standards. Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to the following recommended Conditions of Approval: CIN OF TIGARD/HALL BLVD.OUTFALL PROJECT PAGE 1 OF 8 10/15/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMITS: u m�t to t e anning epartment ra � y, 7 , ext. or review an approval: 1. Prior to site work, the applicant shall provide evidence in writing from the Oregon DSL that the proposed work is approved. 2. The applicant shall compIy with all conditions of approval that are required by the decision issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers dated July 22, 2003. 3. The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval from the Clean Water Services (CWS) service provider letter file #3181 dunng all phases of construction. FAILURE TO SATISFY THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITHIN 18 MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION SHALL RENDER THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION VOID. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site Histo : e site is currently occupied by an existing single-family residence and an out building. The two buildings were constructed within the floodway and floodplain when they were originally built. As a result of a recent fire, it is anticipated that the City will demolish and remove the existing buildings on the site. The proposal is for a stormwater outfall that serves to convey water from the water quality facility and discharge it into Fanno Creek. Vicinit Information: e site is zone R-12 and surrounded by a mixture of multi-family, single-family, and industrial development. The site is also adjacent to Fanno Creek and Hall Blvd. A portion of the site is being developed by the City for a new library. The City is also involved in a separate study to construct Wall Street, a street connection between SW Hall Blvd. and SW Hunziker that would be aligned along the southern portion of this site. Site Information and Pro osal Descri tion: e site is current y eve ope wit a single-family home and an out building. The site slopes east to west and is within both the floodplain and the floodway. As a condition of approval for the library project, the City was required to construct a half-street improvement along SW Hall Blvd. This proposed outfall would convey stormwater that has been treated from the additional impervious surface of that improvement into Fanno Creek. SECTION IV. DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES, PERMITS AND USE Use Classification: Section 18.130.020 is s e se a egories. The applicant is proposin� to construct a stormwater outfall into the Fanno Creek and it's associated floodway. Basic Utilities are permitted conditionally in this zone with the exception of water, storm, and sanitary sewers, which are outright permitted within the R-12 zoning district. Summa Land Use Permits: Chapter 18.310 e ines t e ecision-ma ing type to which the land-use application is assigned. CITY OF TIGARD/HALL BLVD.OUTFALL PROJECT PAGE 2 OF 8 10/15/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER The proposed proJ'ect would typically not be sub'ect to review as it is an outright permitted use in the R-12 zone; however, because a portion o�the pro�ect impacts the floodway, this request is subject to review before the City of Tigard Hearings Officer as a Type III-HO review. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA A summary of,the applicable criteria in this case in the Chapter order in which they are addressed in this report are as follows: A. A licable Develo ment Code Standards ecision- a ing roce ures 18.510 Residential Zoning Districts) 18.775 Sensitive Lands Review} 18.790 Tree Removal) SECTION VI. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS A. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. According to Table 18.510.1, basic utilities excluding water, storm, and sanitary sewers are subject to conditional use approval. The proposal is to extend a stormwater outfall into the Fanno Creek Floodway. There are no structures associated with the proposal, and no new lots are being created as a result of the proposal. Therefore, there are no applicable development standards (i.e. setbacks, lot width, etc.) for this proposal. FINDING: Based on the information provided in the narrative and on the site plan, the development standards of the R-12 zone are not applicable to this proposal. Sensitive Lands 18.775 Th�ings icer s all have the authority to issue a sensitive lands Permit in the 100-year floodplain by means of a Type IIIA procedure, as governed by Section 18.3J0.050, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.775.070 B-E The proposal involves placing a storm outfall within the vegetated corridor and 100-year floodway of Fanno Creek. This proposal is considered by the Tigard Hearings Officer. 18.775.040 General Provisions for Floodplain Areas. Permit review. The appropriate approval authority shall review all permit applications to determine whether proposed building s�tes will be safe from flooding. Special flood hazard. The areas of special flood hazard identified by the Federal Insurance Administration in a scientific and engineering report entitled "The Flood Insurance Study of the City of Tigard," dated September 1, 1981, with accompanying Flood Insurance Maps (updated February 1984 is hereby adopted by reference and declared to be a par-t of this chapter. This F�ood Insurance Study is on file at the Tigard Civic Center. The .applicant and staff have reviewed these maps and a�ree that this site is within one of the identified special flood hazard areas. The application is being reviewed under this premise. CITY OF TIGARDlHALL BLVD.OUTFALL PROJECT PAGE 3 OF 8 10/15/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Base flood elevation data. When base flood elevation data has not been provided in accordance with Subsection B above, the Director shall obtain, review and reasonabty utilize any base flood elevation and floodway data available from a federal, state or other source, in order to administer Subsections M and N below. According to the City Floodplain Maps, the base flood elevation has been identified at 143.8 to 143.9. This cntenon is met Test of reasonableness. Where elevation data is not available either through the Flood Insurance Studx or from another authoritative source, aQplications for building permits shall be reviewed to assure that proposed construction will be reasonably safe from flooding. The test of reasonableness is a local judgment and includes use of historical data, high water marks, photographs of past flooding: etc., where available. Failure to elevate at least two feet above grade in these sensitive land areas may result in higher insurance rates. As discussed previously, the elevation data is available on the maps that are available within Tigard City Hall. This criterion is met Resistant to flood damage. All new construction and substantial improvements, including manufactured homes, shall be constructed with materials and utility equipment resistant to flood damage. There is no equipment that would need to be flood proof. The pipe is open on both ends, and in the event that the pond floods, water will be able to travel either way. Minimize flood damage. All new construction and substantial improvements, including manufactured homes, shall be constructed using methods and practices that minimize flood damage. Equipment protection. Electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing, and air-conditioning equiPment and other service facilities shall be designed and/or otherwise elevated or located so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components during conditions of flooding. There are no new service facilities associated with this improvement. Water Supply Systems. All new and replacement water supply systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of floodwater into the system. There are no new water supply systems proposed with this application. Anchoring. All new construction, all manufactured homes and substantial improvements shall be anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement of the structure. The outfall will be buried, and will not be subject to flotation. Sanitary sewerage systems. New and replacement sanitary sewerage systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of floodwater into the systems and discharge from the systems into floodwater. There are no new or replacement sanitary sewerage systems associated with this proposal. CITY OF TIGARD/HALL BLVD.OUTFALL PROJECT PAGE 4 OF 8 10/15/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER On-site water disposal systems. On-site water disposal systems shall be located to avoid impairment to them or contamination from them during flooding. There are no on-site detention facilities associated with this proposal because it lays directly adjacent to Fanno Creek. This criterion is met. Residential Construction. New construction and substantial improvement of any residential structure, including manufactured homes, shall have the lowest floor, including the basement, elevated at least one foot above base flood elevation; This standard does not apply as the purpose of this construction is for institutional purposes. Nonresidential Construction. New construction and substantial improvement of any commercial, industrial, or other nonresidential structure shall either have the lowest floor, including basement, elevated to the level of the base flood elevation, or together with attendant utility and sanitary facilities, shall: Be flood-proofed so that below the base flood level the structure is watertight with walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water; Have structural components capable of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and effects of buoyancy; Be certified by a registered professional engineer or architect that the desi�n and methods of construct�on are in accordance with accepted standards of practice for meeting provisions of this subsection based on their development and/or review of the structural design, specifications and plans. Such certifications shall be provided to the Building Official as set forth in Subsection 18.775.030 E2; and Non-residential structures that are elevated, not flood-proofed, must meet the same standards for space below the lowest floor as described in 18.775.040 L2. Applicants flood-proofing nonres�dential buildings shall be notifed that flood insurance premiums will be based on rates that are one foot below the flood-proofed level (e.g., a building constructed to the base flood level will be rated as one foot below that.level). As discussed previously, there are no new structures associated with this development. The proposal calls for a stormwater outfall pipe to discharge water into Fanno Creek. Subdivisions and partitions in 100-year floodplain. Subdivisions and partitions in the 100-year floodplain shall meet the following criteria: This proposal does not involve a subdivision or partition. Within the 100-year floodplain The Hearings Officer shall approve, approve with conditions or deny an application request within the 100-year floodplain based upon findings that all of the following cr�ter�a have been satisfied: Land form alterations shall preserve or enhance the floodplain storage function and maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway shall not result in any encroachments, including fill, new construction, substantial imQrovements and other development unless certified by a registered professional engineer that the encroachment will not result in any increase in flood levets during the base flood discharge; CITY OF TIGARDMALL BLVD.OUTFALL PROJECT PAGE 5 OF 8 10/15/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER The applicant has provided a letter from Greg Berry, P.E., indicating that the proposed outfall will remove about forty cubic yards of material, make the improvement, and restore the grade back to its natural state. Any excess soil will be disposed of off site. He indicates that there will be no alterations within the floodplain that will reduce floodplain storage or the ability of the floodplain to maintain the zero-rise floodway. This criterion has been satisfied. Land form alterations or developments within the 100-year floodplain shall be allowed only in areas designated as commercial or industrial on the comprehensive plan land use map, except that alterations or developments associated with community recreation uses, utilities, or public support facilities as defined in Chapter 18.120 of the Community Developmenf Code shall be allowed in areas designated residential subject to applicable zoning standards; The alterations that are proposed within the floodway are, proposed to accommodate placement of the stormwater outfall. These items are identified as utilities within Chapter 18.120 of the Tigard Development Code (TDC) and are, therefore, permitted activities within the 100-year floodplain. This criterion is satisfied. Where a land form alteration or development is permitted to occur within the floodplain it will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100- year flood; As discussed earlier, the applicant has indicated that no proposed activity will increase the water surface elevation of the 100-year flood. If the grade is brought back to its natural state, staff concurs. This criterion is satisfied. The land form alteration or development plan includes a pedestrian/bicycle pathway in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan, unless the construction of said pathway is deemed by the Hearings Officer as untimely; The Fanno Creek Trail system will be located on the site consistent with the Regional Transportation Plan, and the adopted Transportation Systems Plan. The construction of the trail has been previously conditioned with the approvaf of the conditional use permit for the new City Library. Additionally, the City has obtained a $50,000 grant to ensure construction of that portion of the trail. This criterion is met. The plans for the pedestrian/bicycle pathway indicate that no pathway will be below � the elevation of an average annual flood. This criterion is not applicable to this proposal. The necessary U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board, Division of State Lands (DSL) approvals shall be obtained; and The applicant has provided proof of approval for the work from the US Army Cor s of Engineers, but has not provided approval from the Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL� FINDING: The applicant has not provided any evidence that would indicate that no approval from the Oregon DSL is necessary for the work that is proposed within the 100-year floodway. The US Army Corps of Engineers has issued a permit for the work dated July 22, 2003. CONDITIONS: ➢ Prior to site work, the applicant shall provide evidence in writing from the Oregon DSL that the proposed work is approved. ➢ The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval that are required by the decision issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers dated July 22, 2003. CITY OF TIGARD/HALL BLVD.OUTFALL PROJECT PAGE 6 OF 8 10/15/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Where land form alterations andlor development are allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require the consideration of dedication of sufficient open land area within and adjacent to the floodplain in accordance with the comprehensive plan. This area shall include portions of a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. The property already belongs to the City, and the construction of the trail has been previously conditioned with the approval of the conditional use permit for the new City Library. This criterion is satisfied. Within draina ewa s. The Director shall approve, approve with conditions or deny an app ica ion reques or a sensitive lands permit within drainageways based upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied: The extent and nature of the proposed land form alteration or development will not create site disturbances to an extent greater than the minimum required for the use; The applicant has indicated that there will be no permanent land form alteration, and that the site will be disturbed to the minimum extent necessary to place the outfall. They add that the work area will be restored to its previous state once the outFall is placed. In complying with the conditions of approval and subsequent approvals from CWS, ODSL, and the Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), this criterion is satisfied. The proposed land form alteration or development will not result in erosion, stream sedimentation, ground instability, or other adverse on-site and off-site effects or hazards to life or property; There is no evidence in the record to suggest that this project will result in hazards to life or property. The project is subject to an erosion control plan with Clean Water Services as the enforcement agency: If for any reason the work failed to comply with these standards, the project would be sub�ect to joint enforcement from CWS and the City of Tigard. The water flow capacity of the drainageway is not decreased; The proposed development will not alter the water flow capacity of the existing drainageway. Where natural vegetation has been removed due to land form alteration or development, the areas not covered by structures or impervious surfaces will be replanted to prevent erosion in accordance with Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; The applicant has received approval from Clean Water Service by way of a service provider letter. The service provider letter requires the applicant to remove non-native vegetation, and provide a landscape and maintenance plan to ensure that the area of disturbance is replanted, and that the slope of the bank is not compromised bX the work. Compliance with the conditions of approval from the service provider letter will satisfy this criterion. FINDING: The applicant has obtained approval from CWS to complete the proposed work provided the applicant satisfies the conditions of that letter. CONDITION: The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval from the CWS service provider letter file #3181 during all phases of construction. The drainageway will be replaced by a public facility of adequate size to accommodate maximum flow in accordance with the adopted 198'( Master Drainage Plan; The drainageway will remain intact. No replacement is necessary. CITY OF TIGARD/HALL BLVD.OUTFALL PROJECT PAGE 7 OF 8 10/15/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Tree Removal (18.790) �c�ion . 3�requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared�by a certified arborist shall be rovided witTi a site development review a�plication. The tree plan shall include identi�cation of all existing trees identification o a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inc�es in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program,defining standards and methods that will be used by the appficant to protect trees during and after construction. A tree survey and protection plan from Halstead Arboriculture Consultants was submitted for this property with the City Library project. Staff has visited the location and determined that there will be no trees affected by this work. The nearest tree to the proposed construction is fifty plus feet. All tree protection measures are in place, and have been verified by the City's Arborist. This criterion has been satisfied. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed this application, but offered no comments. The City of Tigard Engineering Department was sent this proposal for review and stated that they have no additional comments to add to the application. City of Tigard Arborist has reviewed this application and stated that he has no objections to the work. SECTI�N VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Clean Water Services has reviewed the proposal, and stated that all improvements must be in compliance with the CWS service provider letter and current Design and Construction Standards. (Contact Lee Walker or Heidi Berg) Washin�ton County has reviewed the proposal and indicated that they have no comments or objections to the proposal. The US Army Corps of Engineers, Oregon DEQ, Oregon DSL, Ore�on DFW, Metro, and ODOT were given the opportunity to review this proposal and submitted no comments or objections. ha� October 2 2003 . r i y Associate Planner �._.. __ � '�'`" October 2 2003 . ic ar ewers Planning Mana r CITY OF TIGARDMALL BLVD.OUTFALL PROJECT PAGE 8 OF 8 10/15/2003 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER . . �� GEOORaPn-C il�F00.M>TiON S�STE�� I '' nc�Nrr�r r� � BURNHAM — _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ SlR20U3-00009 HAII 60 U LEVARD CULVERT EXTENSION � , .; � ; ��:. � �� ,P � � � ,� �ti ''�x ��R � ti� �� ., � � �- , -�;, � m > �\ a �'.`� FEaP4. � Y� ._„ }-� �:�... P ��,.�SITE�� y=�'.��- �' .,, ,i�,�_� �\ � ��'\ , _ _� -� t `�' i �,, cn � �:� �� ...� ,� �<, �'`�� . .. � 9�ti�RR �� .._pJ� — �, � '� �' .. p.J. '.-/ `gfiNITA J � \• `.' ,`+. '\ :. ... 't. T. , � . Q 1`,,, �\ \��. ," , �� ,:. ` � ��\ FyE�lU!?� r � �� ..._ ...� __.DS�Rt_W1.,. \ ..._.... .(' :�• ;/ � � � �'7' . J Tpartl Area Map i ; � N � O'MARA 0 100 200 300 400 Fee� 1'=317 feet I J li J Q City of Tigard � 2 In(ormation m Ihis map is fa general laatlon only and shoultl be venfled with Ihe Oev810pment ServiCeS DiviSian. 13125 SW Hall Blva Tigard,OR 97223 (503)639-4111 http:/Av.�w.ci.lqa rd.a.us Community Development Plot date:Sep 1 S,2�03;C:lmagiclMAGIC03.APR 3 ^d -a � � � o � � 0 N H ' v� � Q � � m ,^ � �, i > �. �o � � � � � � � z ^ ; ; � � : � � � z � � I � � � �I ; � � � � i m �n � I � � � I o �. � � _. ._ __ __ _ _'�._s� �.,s�,�J�� n „a� ��„' �� ^ ._ i � SW HALL BOULEYARD — —''°°�=o:iv==��,L_ _ n ,�oo �� I � Q , I v __ _ _..___'� _ ___ .--- � —�„�?, '",,n a�oo__``�� __ n �o, __ _1 W � =�. ---r- � ,�a, ��_ __ _ _ _n aa� �' n .o, � \�L *cb ........ ,, --VS•-�— -r �±o�.a�`�� '.'' - • -,__ �== . - - �� ' � ' i .L ocation of Cu/verl n Jcn i � n �or, � � �•��,... ..' .... �'- �+= _ ,�` - ,,s� lo be�xtended � � � rz ,�o i n sao i � ` _ ----� I ; I � I L�av�p,s„„a,,�o„,►ao, ' \ n�sa� �— — _ ' M7A'A / ! I' I FANNO PO/NTE �� "�*�-�u�;�""O11 '\ ' DE�ELOPMENT i � pROPOS D T/GARD ��- ��•> > i� � L/BR4RY�/TE z � �� Appro�rnate L ocation I � I i � ofProqosedBioswa/e � r �i J f � I � �� /, °° � � � � � C �� i i . I APProximate Localion m ��i � i i I olFanno Creek —�'� � H I �� I /� a r � � �� , � � � � � m `` , � I / n O m �� \ � C i� Z \ \� r pO � v � < nri N 1'11 � � � � O y � � � �i F T �' �C `° � m z N � Z CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION �� DEHAAS & Associates, Inc. EXHIBIT� Attn: Marlin DeHaas SLR2003-00009 Suite 300 —AGC Center HALL BOULEVARD CULVERT EXTENSION 9450 SW Commerce Circle Wilsonville, OR 97070 City of Tigard Engineering Department Attn: Vannie Nguyen AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITYOFTIGARD �'ommurrity�Develoyment ShapingA BetterCommunity I, �'atricia L. Lunsf ord, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a SeniorAcfministrative SpeciaCrst for the �'ity of 7igarrf, 'Waskington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropnate Box(s)Below) � NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING FOR: � SLR2003-00009/HALL BOULEVARD fUIVERT EXTENSION (File No./Name Reference) HEARING BODY: HEARING DATE: City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Hearings Officer (10/15/2003) Tigard Planning Commission Tigard City Council A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhlblt"A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhi6it'B",and by reference made a part hereof, on September 22,2003, and deposited in the United States Mail on Sepiember 22,2003, postage prepaid. _ , (Person th rep r Notic ) ,57A?E O�'�GON ) County of`Was ington )ss. City of 7rgar� � Subscribed and sworn/affir ed before me on the day of / / �� , 2003. --�� OFFICIAL SEAL �� ;o J BENGTSON 7 NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON � � CO��IMISSION NO.368�86 ��,.� - `MY COMMIS510N EXPIRES APR.27,2007 / My Commission Expires: c�' � � � _xHiBiT A NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE, IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. CITY OF TIGARD Coramunity�DeveCopmerit C�� S�ayirtgj7�eetter�'ormrtiurity PUBLIC HEARIHG NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEETING ON WEDNESDAY OCTOBER 15. 2003 AT 7:00 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER AT 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: Fi�E No.: SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 2003-00009 FILE TITLE: HALL BOULEVARD CULVERT EXTENSION APPLICANT: City of Tigard OWNER: City of Tigard Attn: Vannie Nguyen 13125 SW Hall Boulevard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: The City of Tigard is seeking Sensitive Lands Review approval to extend a stormwater outfall into the floodway along Fanno Creek. The outFall would serve to convey treated stormwater from the water quality facility to the waterway. LOCATION: 13360 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 2S102DA, Tax Lot 600. ZONE: R-12: Medium-Density Residential District. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.510, 18.775 and 18.790. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.390 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURES ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 2438 (VOICE) OR (503) 684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE HEARINGS OFFICER MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENC� iN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION Lt�S THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING, ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. A REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE MADE ONLY AT THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING (ORS 197.763(6). INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST ACCOMPANIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY AN OPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO THE ISSUE PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25�) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25�) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER BRAD KILBY AT (503) 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223, OR BY E-MAIL TO bradley@ci.tigard.or.us. __ — ��— � ;t .�..�< �,�ou. a.� . E� ; I YICINITY MAI� ' � BURNHAM —_=____=_ . ��SLR2003-00009 "�`��HALL BOULEVARD � '��i CULVERT EXTENSION ti I � \\� P �\\�� i o�\��;�� u( �7�� \�� .: . �� -> - \�\� � "� � � P � �SITE � �";� �:� �� \ " J� t'�L_kj'� � � \��:� `�, .�•�`` '_P"�..,,._� . - \\��\\\��• __.��°°'"��;�, �. , �`�\\�\ .aa,a.,e.Mao ---- — � �- _ � . �, i — N O'MAR I 0 10p i00 300 t00 Feet I j t"=Jt)lael J '�J iCiry of Tigard IMam�um m tlY m�P N br Ve^>M loc/Im aM rM �IwM E�wMtl w1M M Dw�aPnFM SYNw�DnUla�. 1]IIS SW MY�MO Tlppd.OR ATl1 lewl wa111 1�J/www.tl.YPIlP.I� S L�2�ao3—� 19102102 58 RTITION PLAT COo2DD�ARLES W EXH I B IT� OW F LOTS 1 &2 1383 HALL ARD,O 7223 2S102DD-07200 2S102DA-00690 AMARIR JEANNE M AUMAN& EIKREM A AMARIR AHMED PO BOX 82824 13615 SW HALL BLVD PORTLAND,OR 97282 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102DD-01500 2S102DD-00300 BLICK CARL J DONA JEAN FANNO POINTE LLC 8740 SW O'MARA 109 EAST 13TH ST TIGARD,OR 97223 VANCOUVER,WA 97660 2S102DA-00900 2S10100-01200 CHARBONNEAU LARRY& FIELDS FRED W WELSH ROBIN 1149 SW DAVENPORT 13337 SW HALL BLVD PORTLAND,OR 97201 TIGARD,OR 97223 S102DD-00100 2S102DD-05600 CI OF T RD HERRERA JUAN& 131 HA�L BLVD OROKE GABRIELA T ARD,O 7223 13705 SW HALL TIGARD,OR 97223 2 102DD-00 2S 102DD-01603 CIT F GARD HOLLAND RONALD P MARY L 131 S ALL BLVD 8850 SW EDGEWOOD T ARD,OR 7223 TIGARD,OR 97223 02DA-00600 2S102DD-01400 CITY ARD HOLSTEIN MARVIN R/LORETTA R TRS 131 BLVD 8710 SW OMARA ARD,OR 97 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 10100-01201 2S 10100-00600 COE MANUFACTURING CO THE JEMPAK PARTNERS LLC P O BOX 520 7034 SW 83RD AVE PAINESVILLE,OH 44077 PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S 102DD-00902 2S 102DD-01601 COLLING CHARLES JENSEN DAVID L AND LOIS C 8878 SW EDGEWOOD ST 8840 SW EDGEWOOD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 102DD-00907 2S 7 02DD-Ot 300 COLLING CHARLES W KRAEMER JULIA A&MARK W 13835 SW HALL PO BOX 80665 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97280 � ' 2S1U2DD-01604 , 2 02bA-00704 LASNIEWSKI WILLIAM L AND TIGA CI F TERESA A 1312 LL 8860 SW EDGEWOOD ARD,OR 3 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 102DA-00100 2 102DA-0040 MAGNO LLC TIG D OF 8800 SW COMMERICAL ST 131 ALL TIGARD,OR 97223 ARD,OR 223 2S102DD-01501 2 02DA-00400 O'FARRELL WILLIAM B&PEGGY JO TIG D Y OF 3311 E MERCER 1312 HALL SEATTLE,WA 98112 ARD,O 97223 2S102DD-05700 2 2DA-0�401 REUTHER DEBBIE TIGA OF 11900 SW JAMES CT 131 W LL TIGARD,OR 97223 T ARD,OR 9 3 2S102DA-00800 2 02DA-0020 SCHALTZ RANDY A&MARGARET C TIG OF 13335 SW HALL BLVD 131 LL TIGARD,OR 97224 ARD,OR 7223 2S102DA-00300 2 02DD-0040 SCHRAMM ANN M TIG D Y OF do KIM WILLIAM YOSHIO& 131 HALL NINA VO T ARD,0 97223 8770 SW BURNHAM 5T TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 102DD-00400 2S 102DA-00500 SOLARES HOMES L L C TIGARD-TUALATIN SCHOOL BY NORRIS BEGGS&SIMPSON DISTRICT 23J LOAN SVC DEPT ATTN:BUSINESS MANAGER 121 SW MORRISON#2Q0 6960 SW SANDBURG ST PORTLAND,OR 97204 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 102DD-01100 2S102DD-01600 SO�IS EDGAR TRUSTEE TINNIN ROBERT O ELAINE M PO BOX 231193 8876 SW EDGEWOOD STREET TIGARD,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 102DD-01301 2S 102DD-01602 STATE OF OREGON TOKUDA KAZUHIDE AND DEPARTMENT OF TRASPORTATION CAROL LYN RIGHT OF WAY SECTION 8870 5W EDGEWOOD 5T 417 TRANSPORTATION BLDG TIGARD,OR 97223 SALEM,OR 97310 2S102DA-00701 TIGARD CHRISTIAN CHURCH 13405 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82�d Avenue Tigartl, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78�Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Trigoboff 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigartl, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs 7775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 David Chapman 9840 SW Landau Place Tigard, OR 97223 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Brad Spring 7555 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE �i:lcurpinlsetupllabelslClT East.doc) UPDATED: April 18, 2002 Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summefield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Kristen Miller 8940 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 97223 Paul Owen 10335 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Tim Esau PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 97281 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Ross Sundberg 16382 SW 104th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Brian Wegener 9830 SW Kimberly Drive Tigard, OR 97224 J. Dyar 10430 SW Century Oak Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Rex Caffall 13205 SW Village Glenn Tigard, OR 97223 Josh Thomas 10395 SW Bonanza Tigard, OR 97224 CITY Of TIGARD - SOUTH CIT SUB[OMMITfEE (pg. I of I) (i:lcurpinlsetupllabelslClT South.doc) UPDATED: June 18,2003 • h AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING N�TICE OF A LAND USE PROPOSAL IMPORTANT NOTICE: THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A COPY OF THE NOTICE THAT WAS POSTED ON THE SITE. In the Matter of the Proposed Land Use Applications for: Land Use File Nos.: SLR2003-00009 Land Use File Name: HALL BOULEVARD CULVERT EXTENSION I, Brad Kilbv, Associate Planner for the Citv of Tiqard, do affirm that I posted notice of the land use proposal affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) IF no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) �SiI;dUH 7Nx c.r t_-r'� , and did personally post notice of the Public Hearing on the proposed land use application(s) by means of weatherproof posting in the general vicinity of the affected territory, a copy of said notice being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the ��'�`' day of��-i,, f� , 2003. � f' '�-�'� Signature of'Person Who Performed Posting (In the presence of the Notary) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the o?��`` day of S�P��''" b `� , 2p ° 3 T- OFFICIAL SEAL Q. � W"'`��1 CHERYL A CAINES �� NOTARY PUE3UGOREGON NOTA PUBLIC OF OREGON COh1MISSION N0.371603 MY COMMISSiON EXPIRES AUG. 14,2007 My Commission Expires: h:\loginlpatty\masters\affidavit of posting for applicant to post public hearing.doc N �TICE � F PU BLIC H EARING � The following will be considered by the Ti ard Hearin s Officer on Wednesda October 15 2003 at 7:00 PM at the � Tigard Civic Center - Town Hall, 131 a v ., igar , Oregon. o pu ic ora an wri en es imony is invited. The public hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance with the Tigard Municipal Code and the rules of �rocedure adopted by the Council and available at City Hall or the rules of procedure set forth in Chapter 18.390. estimony may be submitted in writing prior to or at the public hearing or verbally_at the public hearing only. Failure to raise an issue in person or by letter at some point prior to.the close of the hearing accompanied by statements or evidence sufficient to afford the decision-maker an opportunity to respond to the issue precludes appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeal based on that issue. Failure to specify the criterion from the Community.Development Code or Comprehensive Plan at which a comment is directed precludes an appeal based on that criterion. A copy of the application .and all documents and evidence submitted by or on behalf of the applicant, and the applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost. A copy of the staff report will be made available for inspection at no cost at least seven (7) days prior to the hearing, and copies for all items can also be provided at a reasonable cost. Further information may be obtained from the Planning Division staff contact: Brad Kilb at 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223,-by calling 503-639-4171 , or by email to bra ey ci. igar .or.us. SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 2003-00009 REQU EST: The City of Tigard is seeking Sensitive Lands Review approval to extend a stormwater outfall into the floodway along Fanno Creek. The outfall would serve to convey treated stormwater from the water quality facility to the waterway. LOCATION: 13360 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 2S102DA, Tax Lot 600. ZONE: R-12: Medium-Density Residential District. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.510, 18.775 and 18.790. 120 DAYS = N/A CITYOPTIOARD DATE OF FILING: I 0/??/2003 Con�ntunity�ve�eCop��ie�u S(apingA Better�'oinmunity CITY OF TIGARD `iNashiragton County, Oredo�r. NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER Case Numbers: SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW SLR 2003-00009 Case Name: HALL BOULEVARD CULVERT EXTENSION Name of Owner: Cit of Ti ard Attn: Vannie N u en Name of Applicant: Same as Owner Address of Applicant: 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Ti ard Ore on 97223 Address of Property: 13360 SW Hall Bouleverd Tax Ma /Lot Nos.: Washin ton Co. Tax Assessor's Ma No. 2S102DA, Tax Lot 600. A FINAL ORDER INCORPORATING THE FA[TS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE AND SENSITIYE LANDS REVIEW. THE CITY OF TIGARD HEARINGS OFFI[ER HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICANT'S PLANS, NARRATIVE, MATERIALS, [OMMENTS OF REVIEWING AGENfIES, THE PIANNING DIVISION'S STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE APPLICATION DESCRIBED IN fURTHER DETAIL IN THE STAFF REPORT. THE HEARINGS OFFICER HELD A PUBLI( HEARING ON OCTOBER 15, 2003 TO REfEIVE TESTIMONY REGARDING THIS APPLI(ATION. THIS DELISION NAS BEEN BASED ON THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND fONfLUSIONS CONTAINED WITHIN THIS FINAL ORDER. Request: ➢ The City of Tigard is seeking Sensitive Lands Review approval to extend a stormwater outfall into the floodway along Fanno Creek. The outfall would serve to convey treated stormwater from the water quality facility to the waterway. At the close of the record, the Hearings Officer conditionally approved all applications subject to the conditions of approval within this final order. Zone: R-12: Medium-Density Residential District. Applicable Review Criteria: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.510, 18.775 and 18.790. Action: ➢ ❑ Approval as Requested � Approval with Conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper and mailed to: � Owners of Record Within the Required Distance 0 Affected Government Agencies 0 Area Citizen Involvement Team 0 The Applicants and Owners The adopted findings of fact and decision can be obtained from the Planning Division/Community Development Department at the City of Tigard City Hall. Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. ,,....,....�. � \ GEOGRAVHiC•i4�ORUq1,iOrv ,YSTEM AREA NOTIFIEp '�% '�, (500') �° `�o 90 90 FOR: Diane Jelderks „,�,,,,, City of Tigard Eng. Dept. n� n•�� RE: 2S I OZDA, 600 & „�,� n,,,�„ 2S I OZDD; I 00, �00 ri, n„�,,, Property owner information is valid for 3 months from ""�tl" the date printed on this map. „■ri�« s.�.� P nrnwwi � n r � w a s� ♦ n.�..., �,y� N �.,.....� �.�...�. n.„...� 0 200 400 600 Feet 3fl�M�M �� Mf�MtiM M1lNM7M 1"=453 feel t�fHYtM x l�M1�M�M! t[11NN� xim� °w„� nywwwn City of Tigard a Inlormalion o�this map is for genenl lacation any and ahould be verified wilh the Developmenl Services Diviaion. 13725 SW Hall 81vd 87 SW qqTHU r Tigard,OR 97223 ; cr 1 (5031639-4171 n htlp:!lwww.ci.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Jul 10,2003;C:lmagicWIAGIC03.APR ♦ � 102DD-0580 102D�A0900 19 102 RTITION PLAT CO G ARLES W OW F LOTS 1 &2 138 HALL ARD,O 7223 2S 102D D-07 200 2S 102DA-00690 AMARIR JEANNE M AUMAN& EIKREM A AMARIR AHMED PO BOX 82824 13615 SW HALL BLVD PORTLAND,OR 97282 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102DD-01500 2S102DD-00300 BLICK CARL J DONA JEAN FANNO POINTE LLC 8740 SW O'MARA 109 EAST 13TH ST TIGARD,OR 97223 VANCOUVER,WA 97660 2S102DA-00900 2S10100-01200 CHARBONNEAU LARRY 8 FIELDS FRED W WELSH ROBIN 1149 SW DAVENPORT 13337 SW HALL BLVD PORTLAND,OR 97201 TIGARD,OR 97223 5102DD-00100 2S102DD-05600 CI OF T RD HERRERA JUAN 8 131 HALL BLVD OROKE GABRIELA T ARD,O 7223 13705 SW HALL TIGARD,OR 97223 2 102D D-00 2S 102D D-01603 CIT F GARD HOLLAND RONALD P MARY L 131 S ALL BLVD 8850 SW EDGEWOOD T ARD,OR 7223 TIGARD,OR 97223 02DA-00600 2S102DD-01400 CITY ARD HOLSTEIN MARVIN R/LORETTA R TRS 131 BLVD 8710 SW OMARA ARD,OR 97 TIGARD,OR 97223 2s�oioo-oi2oi zsioioo-oosoo COE MANUFACTURING CO THE JEMPAK PARTNERS LLC P O BOX 520 7034 SW 83RD AVE PAINESVILLE,OH 44077 PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S 102DD-00902 2S 102DD-01601 COLLING CHARLES JENSEN DAVID L AND LOIS C 8878 SW EDGEWOOD ST 8840 SW EDGEWOOD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 102DD-0090 7 2S 102DD-01300 COLLING CHARLES W KRAEMER JULIA A 8 MARK W 13835 SW HALL PO BOX 80665 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97280 v � 2S102DD-01604 2 02DA-00704 LASNIEWSKI WILLIAM L AND TIGA CI F TERESA A 1312 LL 8860 SW EDGEWOOD ARD,OR 3 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102DA-0O100 2 02DA-0040 MAGNO LLC TIG D OF 8800 SW COMMERICAL ST 131 ALL TIGARD,OR 97223 T ARD,OR 223 2S102DD-01501 2 02DA-0040 O'FARRELL WILLIAM B&PEGGY JO TIG Y OF 3311 E MERCER 1312 HALL SEATTLE,WA 98112 ARD,O 97223 2S102DD-05700 2 2DA-00401 REUTHER DEBBIE TIGA OF 11900 SW JAMES CT 131 W LL TIGARD,OR 97223 T ARD,OR 9 3 2S102DA-0O800 2 02DA-0020 SCHALTZ RANDY A&MARGARET C TIG OF 13335 SW HALL BLVD 131 LL TIGARD,OR 97224 ARD,OR 7223 2S702DA-00300 2 02DD-0040 SCHRAMM ANN M TIG D Y OF c/o KIM WILLIAM YOSHIO& 131 HALL NINA VO T ARD,O 97223 8770 SW BURNHAM ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102DD-00400 2S102DA-00500 SOLARES HOMES L L C TIGARD-TUALATIN SCHOOL BY NORRIS BEGGS&SIMPSON DISTRICT 23J LOAN SVC DEPT ATTN:BUSINESS MANAGER 121 SW MORRISON#200 6960 SW SANDBURG ST PORTLAND,OR 97204 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 102DD-01100 2S 102D D-01600 SOLIS EDGAR TRUSTEE TINNIN ROBERT O ELAINE M PO BOX 231193 8876 SW EDGEWOOD STREET TIGARD,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102DD-01301 2S102DD-01602 STATE OF OREGON TOKUDA KAZUHIDE AND DEPARTMENT OF TRASPORTATION CAROL LYN RIGHT OF WAY SECTION 8870 SW EDGEWOOD ST 417 TRANSPORTATION BLDG TIGARD,OR 97223 SALEM,OR 97310 25102DA-00701 TIGARD CHRISTIAN CHURCH 13405 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82�d Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78�Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Trigoboff 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs 7775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 David Chapman 9840 SW Landau Place Tigard, OR 97223 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Brad Spring 7555 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE �i:\curpin\setupllabels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: April 18, 2002 Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Kristen Miller 8940 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 97223 Paul Owen 10335 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Tim Esau PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 97281 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Ross Sundberg 16382 SW 104th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Brian Wegener 9830 SW Kimberly Drive Tigard, OR 97224 J. Dyar 10430 SW Century Oak Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Rex Caffall 13205 SW Village Glenn Tigard, OR 97223 Josh Thomas 10395 SW Bonanza Tigard, OR 97224 CITY OF TIGARD - SOUTH CIT SUBCOMMITfEE (pg. I of I) (i:lcurpin\setupllabelslClT South.doc) UPDATED: June 18, 2003 CITY OF T16ARD Community�DeveCopmerat S(api�rg��etter�'ommunity LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 120 DAYS = N/A FILE NO.: SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 2003-00009 FILE TITLE: HALL BOULEVARD CULVERT EXTENSION APPLICANT: City of Tigard OWNER: City of Tigard Attn: Vannie Nguyen 13125 SW Hall Boulevard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: The City of Tigard is seeking Sensitive Lands Review approval to extend a stormwater outfall into the floodway along Fanno Creek. The outFall would serve to convey treated stormwater from the water quality facility to the waterway. LOCATION: 13360 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 2S102DA, Tax Lot 600. ZONE: R-12: Medium-Density Residential District. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.510, 18.775 and 18.790. CIT AREA: South and East DECISION MAKING BODY BELOW: ❑ TYPE I ❑ TYPE II � TYPE III ❑ TYPE IV DATE COMMENTS WERE SENT: SEPTEMBER 17, 2003 DATE COMMENTS ARE DUE: OCTOBER 1, 2003 �HEARINGS OFFICER (WED.) DATE OF HEARING: OCTOBER 15, 2003 TIME: 7:00 PM ❑PLANNING COMMISSION (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM ❑CITY COUNCIL (TUES.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM ❑ STAFF DECISION (TENTATIVE) DATE OF DECISION: COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION � VICINITY MAP � MITIGATION PLAN ❑ TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY � SITE PLAN ❑ NATURAL RESOURCE ❑ IMPACT STUDY � NARRATIVE ASSESSMENT RPT. ❑ STORM H20 ANALYSIS STAFF CONTACT: Brad Kilby, Associate Planner (503) 639-4171, extension 2434 _�' � Project:1 � � �l.� �S�—'� �.00 3 — 00�, LAND USE APPLIG. 0 Date: � � 2 ��? COMPLETEHESS REVIEW ❑ COMPLETE INCOMPLETE � i <<� �� STANDARD INFORMATION; / ; ❑ Deed/Tide/Proaf Of Ownership [Q` Neighborhoad Mtg. Affidavits, Minutes, List Of Attende ❑ �e�-{i�B-3'07 (�USA Service Pravider letter ❑ fanstruction fost Estimate N�r� ❑ # Sets Of Application Materials/Plans � Pre-Application (onference Notes � Envelopes With Postage (Verify Count} �ROjECT STATISTICS: ❑ Building Footprint Size ❑ % Of landscaping On Site / ❑ %Of Building Impervious Surface On Site ❑ Lot Square footage i�I � PLANS DIMENSIONED: ❑ Building Footprint ❑ Parking Spate Dimensions(Indude Accessible&Bike Parking) ❑ Truck loading Space Where Applicable ❑ Building Height ❑ Access Approach And Aisle �,I /fi', ❑ Visual flearance Triangle Shawn ADQITIONAL PLANS: -- � Yicinity Map ❑ Architectural Plan Tree Inventory ❑ Existing Conditions Plan [� Landscape Plan �___._ �Site Plan ❑ Lighting Plan T'REE PLAN/MITIGATION PLAN: °a o ADDITIONAL REPORTS: (list any special reports} ❑ � ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ RESPONSE TO APPLICABLE CODE SECTIONS: ❑ 18330�c�a�u��u�� ❑ I 8.620�r��a T��o��sr�a�as� ❑ I S.�6S(08-Street Puking/Lwding kquiRments) ❑ I H.34O(Direcmrs Intuprenbon) ❑ 18.630(wuhi�gu�sq�ue kpo�i�cxno�r► [�I 8.175�e�� ❑ 18.350(vunned Derebpmend ❑ 18.705µ�ss�gress/Gttu�co�) ❑ 18.180(��) � ❑ I S.36O�ite Devebpment Aeriew) ❑ I H.�I O(Acceuay ksidmUil Units) ❑ I 8.785��u�r��a> ❑ 18.310(vuim«s/Adjusmrcnts) ❑ I 8.l I 5(Densiry eompunions) ❑ I 8.190(free kmoril) ❑ I 8.380 Ro�i�g M�Re�t►��dmmu) ❑ I�.T�O(Desiign Comp�ubi6ry Sonduds) ❑ I 8.195�r��a�«�u� ❑ 18.385�n�an�,�,r��l Q� I B.�2S(EnnronmenGl Perfanuntt Slanduds) . � I 8.390(Dedsion Milcing Procedure:/knput Soidy) � ❑ I H.�3O(Ezcep6ons To Derelopment Sunduds) ❑ I 8.798�w�e��po�r�di�u�� ❑ I 8.410�tnc une Aewsunents� ❑ I 8.740��c«��o��rl ❑ I 8.810�sohc a uouq r��s�e�a:� � I 8.420(luid Pu000ns) ❑ I E.142(Home Ocap�oon Permiu) ❑ I 8.430(s�bd�s) ❑ I H.�AS(Undsc�ping 3 Saeening Sunduds) � I H.S I O(ResidmU�l iming Disuicts) ❑ I 8.150�n��ruw�an+�i H��o«�� ❑ I 8.520(eommerd�1o�i�g uist�cts) ❑ I 8.1 S S�n�=�a�ua wue�aing Smnge) � I S.S3O(Indusbi�l Ioning Districts) ❑ I S.�GO(Nonconfamng Simioons) ADDITIONAL ITEMS: I:kxarpinlmasters�revisedVand use application completeness review.dot REVISED: 17-Jan-01 PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN Project: ,�all Blvd Water Quality Fac/ COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST Date: 8/18/03 GRADING � Existing and proposed contours shown. � Does proposed grading impact adjacent parcels? ❑ Yes � No � Adjacent parcel grades shown. STREETISSUES ❑ Right-of-way clearly shown. NA � Centerline of street(s) clearly shown. � Street name(s) shown. � Existing/proposed curb or edge of pavement shown. ❑ Street profiles shown. NA ❑ Future Street Plan: Must show street profiles, topo NA on adjacent parcel(s), etc. ❑ Traffic Impact Report NA ❑ Street grades compliant? NA � Street widths dimensioned and appropriate? � Private Streets? Less than 6 lots and width appropriate? ❑ Other: SANITARY SEWER ISSUES ❑ Existing/proposed lines shown. NA ❑ Stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? NA WATER ISSUES ❑ Existing/proposed lines w/sizes noted? NA ❑ Existing/proposed fire hydrants shown? NA ❑ Proposed meter location and size shown? NA ❑ Proposed fire protection system shown? NA STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES � Existing/proposed lines shown? ❑ Preliminary sizing calcs for water quality/detention Not provided provided? � Water quality/detention facility shown on plans? ❑ Area for facility match requirements from calcs? n/a � Facility shown outside any wetland buffer? � Storm stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? NA The submittal is hereby deemed ❑ COMPLETE � � INCOMPLETE By: ---- - � Date: 8/18/03 ., - �r� REVISED: 08/18/03 September 2, 2003 Cityof Tigard CIIY OF TIGARD Attn: Vannie Nguyen OREGON 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: SLR2003-00009 Sensitive lands review for water outfall within the Fanno Creek Floodway for Hall Blvd. improvements. Dear Vannie: Your application for sensitive lands review was received on August 6, 2003, and the additional items that were requested on August 25, 2003. The property is located at 13360 SW Hall Blvd. and described as WCTM 2S102DA-00600. This letter is to inform you that the application has been deemed complete, and has been scheduled for review. A tentative hearing date of October 13, 2003 has been scheduled for this matter to appear before the Tigard Hearings Officer. If you have any questions, call me at (503)718-2434. Sincerely, ��i'�� . Brad Kilby Associate Planner C: File SLR2003-00009 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 August 19, 2003 City of Tigard C11Y OF TIGARD Attn: Vannie Nguyen 13125 SW Hall Blvd. OREGON Tigard, OR 97223 RE: SLR2003-00009 Sensitive lands review for water outfall within Fanno Creek Floodway for Hall Blvd. improvements. Dear Vannie: Your application for sensitive lands review was received on August 6, 2003 for the property located at 13360 SW Hall Blvd. and described as WCTM 2S102DA-00600. This letter is to inform you that the application has been deemed incomplete, and that additional items are required in order for me to proceed with the review. The following items are required in order to deem the application complete. • The narrative that was provided did not address the criteria for sensitive lands at all. I cannot make findings based on drawings. You must provide empirical data by way of the narrative that supports the design and illustrafes compliance with the criteria listed in the Tigard Development Code (TDC) sections 18.775.040(A- N), 18.775.070(B)(1-7), 18.775.090. . A tree survey for the parcel that the work is to take place on. If the report that vyas subrnitted with the library covers this area, you can provide that. You could also ask Matt Stine if:he has surveyed this area, and provide a copy of his e ��. . °_. . survey.� :,Y. ;:_ �•: . . • � , , ,t� ., ,�: + i. .. � •; . �� : �,'. . � • Calculations that support the size and des'ign of the proposed�facility:`� Fpr more information, contact Kim McMillan. • Just a reminder, no work can take place within the sensitive land including the flood plain or vegetated corridor without sensitive lands approval. Once these items are in order, and the application has been deemed complete, I will need 15 full copies of all of the information. If you have any questions, call me at (503)718-2434. Sincerely, �� .�� i Brad Kilby Associate Planner C: File SLR2003-00009 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 MEM � RANDUM TO: Brad Kilby FROM: Greg Berry SUBJECT: SLR2003-9 for water outfall within the Fanno Creek Floodway for Hall Blvd. improvements DATE: August 20, 2003 Attached are responses to the approval criteria for this application as required by your August 19th letter. In particular, there is a finding that the floodplain is not being altered so there is no increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge. ��d��F�� iN �,� �v�C11.090 `�� O�� - 4 OREGON �V(Y 17,�9�� -\ C9FC rv. �`�PP •. ' � D[' [� f� f� � uite 300-AGC Center g % i_ i inr-� ��350 SW Commerce Circle •'• • •• •• Wilsonvillc,nR 97070 w. . . . � �` . }. (�03)682-2450 ��' SSD��C�les, I nc. (503) 682-4018 Fax � Consu7lingFngineer5 6 Surveyois August 22, 2003 City of Tigard ��1./E��ED 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard,OR 97223 h�U� 2 5 ?�d� Re: Land Use Application '��GARD Sensitive Lands Review afNE�R�M� Hall Boulevard [mprovements Water Quality Facility The "Proposal Summary" on the application form describes the basic project and the City Code section which requires that the sensitive lands review and subsequent permit be processed through the City's Hearings Officer. The attached plan excerpts from the Hall Blvd. project(Vicinity Map and Sheet 10 of 24 - Water Quality Facilities Plan) illustrate the project. Approximately 1000ft. of Hall Blvd. is being widened on the East side. Both City and Washington County's Clean Water Services(CWS)require that water quality facilities be provided to treat runoff from additional impervious surfacing(the widened pavement). As illustrated, the runoff is collected at a catch basin in Hall Blvd., piped to a water quality manhole, then through a 100ft. long water quality swale, then piped to a manifold which distributes the flow into Fanno Creek through 10 smaller diameter pipes. The outfall over into Fanno Creek is environmentally protected with a special environmental blanket and plantings. As observed on the plans, a portion of the water quality facility falls within the 100-year flood plain, which requires a Sensitive Lands Review. Because the excavation at the top of the bank and the outfall fall within the "Floodway", the sensitive lands review must be taken before the Ciry's Hearings Officer, who would have the authority to issue the Sensitive Lands Permit. Submitted elements are attached as follow: l. Land Use Permit Application. 2. Compliance with applicable development standards. 3. Two(2)sets of notice materials(within SOOft. of the subject property). 4. Evidence of Neighborhood Meeting. 5. Neighborhood Meeting Affidavits of posting and mailing notice, minutes and sign-in sheet. 6. Service Provider Letter(CWS). 7. Copy of Pre-Application Conference notes. 8. Plans-Vicinity Map, Sheet 10 of 24 - Water Quality Facilities Plan, Sheet 22 of 24, Preliminary Plan and two tree survey maps. �� L �� /G�n�-�`l,� � ,p/,�� Marlin J. eHaas, P.E., P.L.S. Vannie Nguyen,P.E. � , , � 1 . LAND USE PE RMI T APPLICATION , � PRE,APP.F{EI.D BY: --- - __ -- — - - � CITY OF TIGA�RD PLAtNI��NC D1U1�1:0`N� � � 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIG�R.D,,OR 97223-8189 503:639.4'f,�1�11503i684;7�2�97 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION File # Other Case# ----� Date By Receipt #t Date Application Complete � TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR I ❑ AdjustmenWariance (I or II) ❑ Minor Land Partition (II) ❑ Zone Change (III) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment (IV) ❑ Planned Development (III} ❑ Zone Change Annexation (IV) ❑ Conditional Use (III) Q Sensitive Lands Review (I, II or((�,� ❑ Zone Ordinance Amendment (IV) ❑ Historic Overlay (II or III) ❑ Site Development Review(II) I ❑ Home Occupation (II) ❑ Subdivision (II or III) ��ATTLSNVOF�EFl ress� avai a e � 13360 SIJ Hall Blvd. _ "T1LX TvD�P-ST1AX i 2S 1 2D�1-00600 4 T�TAL�TTE -- --- - -- -- �NTT�LA�STFf�1CTf�i� !� . 38 acres R-12 7�PPLTCTNT' --- -- — , City c�t �l�i�;�ird ' ivTAILTNG�DD iP-- -- - - - --- I13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 _____ (503) 639-4171 (503) 624-0752 � VaTinie Nguyen (503) 639-4171 is i more an one City of Tigard �lv ATL��AIII3Fl i I13125 SW �3a11 Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 _ f � (.503) 639-4171 (503) 624-0752 'When ttie owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorizaiion from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owners must sign ihis application in the s ace rovided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this a lication. �'� ease e speG ic „ lhe City is widenin� Hall Blvd as required by City and ODOT conditions related to the Library construction and the Fanno Pointe development. An element of the Hall Blvd. widening includes construction of a water quality facility which outfalls into Fanno Creek, part of the construction occurring in the Fanno ree oo way. � According to the Tigard Code, Section 18. 775.020 G Sensitive an s permits issued by the _ � Her3rin�;s (�fficer) , ground disturbances �r anc orm a terations in a oocway areas mus _ ubtain sentitive lands approval from the I�earings Officer through a "I'ype IIIA applicati�n. APPLlCATIONS WILL dOT BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT ALL OF THE REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS AS DESCRIBED IN THE "BASIC SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS" INFORMATION SNEET. __ __ _____ � THE APPLICANT SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • (f the application is granted, the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. ♦ All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, map be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. ♦ The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application(s). SIGNATURES OF EACH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED. Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Sfgnature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date , �' ' � �/6l�� Applicant/Ag t/Representative's Signature Date Applicant/AgenURepresentative's Signature Date . 2. COMPLIANCE ' w�th DEVEL�PMENT S TANDARD S Compliance with Applicable Development Standards APPROVAL. CRITERIA . Floodplain 1. Cand jorm allera�ions shal! prese�ve or enhance !he�1oodplain stota�e function and maintenance of the zero foot rise floodway shall nat result in any encroachmenls, including fill, new concrructinn, suhslanlial improve�nenls and other developmenr unless certified by o regislered profes•s•iono! engineer tha� the encroachnrenl wil! not resull in any increase in Jlood levels durrng tl�e base flood drscharge; As shown on the attached Shaet D1, about twenty feet of the length of the propased water quality facility extends into the floodway. This will result in about forty cubic yards of excavation that will be removed from the floodplain and disposed upland. The surrounding ground will remain unaltered. The ground being excavated for the twelve- inch line to the outfall and the outfall structure will be retumed to the original contours. Consequently, there will be no filling or othcr altorations within the floodplain that will reduce floodplain storage or the ability of the floodplain to maintain the 2ero-nse fIoodway. 1. Land jorrn alterorions or develuprnents within !h� i00-yeur flvodplein shall be alloK�ed only in areas des�ignared as commercial or rndus�rtal on the cornprehensive plun lund use map, excepl that alreracions or developments associ�ted with communiry recreation uses, utilities, or public support facilrties as deftned in Chapter 18.I10 aJ lhe Communiry 17evelopment Gode shall be allvwed in areas designated reside»rial subjec�to applicable zOning sl[1nl�A'r(IS; � The proposed drainage improven�ents are pem�itted in this medium density residential Area as a utiliry. 3. Where a land form al�erption or dwelopmen� rs pern�ilfed to occur within lhe floodplain rl wil!noi resulr in any increase rn !he waler sNrface eleratlorr of rhe l00-yearJlood: 1 Atl ground will be retw-ned to the original contours so there will be no a�1y increase in the wAter surface elevation of the 104-year flood. 4. The land form alleration or development plan encludes a pedestriarr/bicycle palhway rn accordance with rhe adopted pedes�rian/bicycle pathway plun, unle�s Ihe conslruc�ron oj said parhway r's deemed by the�learings �cer cts untimely; S. Tl�e pla�•jor the pedeslrian/bicycle pnthway indieate that no pathway wil!be below the elevatron of an uverage annual flood; pedestrian/bicycle pathways for this site are required by CUP 2003-001, Condition of Approval No. 10—Tigard Library. 6. The necessary U.S Army Corps of Enginecrs and S�ale of Oregon Land Board,D;vision of State Lands, and CYYSpermils and app�ova�s shall be obtained; The required U.S. Army Corpa of Engineers and CWS permits are attached. 7. Where land jorm allerarians unrl/or develvpn�ent are allowed wilhi►► and adjacent ro rhe 100-year floodplain, the City shall reyurre the coasideratron of dedic�lion of su�cien� open land areo within and adjacent �o the Jloodplain in accordance wi�h rhe comprehensive plan. This area shal! include portions aj a st�itahle elevation for the cvnstnic�iu,� uf a pedesrrian/bicycle parhway ti��rrhin rhe lloodpla�rr irr accordance wilh the ua��Ea�edestria�i/bicycle pa�hwayplan. Tl�e parcel is o�vned by ttie City. The portion of the parcel llong the floodplain is currently b�ing planned for park purposes. . Drainaqewav 1. The extent and nature of the praposed land forn: alleration or developmenr will nar create site disrurbances to the extent greater Ihan that required for�he use. There will be no changc of use. Disturbance will be limited to that required to install the oUtfall. 1. The proposed land form alteratia� or developmen! will nnJ resull in erosion, 51r�pm sedimentarion, ground i►rstability, ar other adverse on-site er�d oJf-site effecrs or hazards to life or prorerty. The work wili be subjeet ta an erosion control plan and will be inspected. Tn addition, a Nationwide Permit in complianee vvith Section 404 of the Clean 'Water Act regulates erosion and sediment control. 3. Tlie ivater�low capacity ojthe drainagewcry is no!decreased,� The flo�v characteristics of the drainageway wili not be altaed. 4. �i'here natural vegelation has been removed due to land form a/teration or development, the area,r not covered by structures or irnpervious• surjaces will be replanted!o prevenr erosion in accardance with Chaprer J8.745, Landscaping and Sereening, Restoration will be accomplished in accordance with the attached Corps of Engineers 1'ermit. S. The drainageway will be replaced by a p�blic facility of adequate srae �o accommodale maximu��?'ow in accorriance wilh the adopted 1981 Ma.rter Arainage Plan. The dra.inageway will not be altered. 6. 7he necessary U.S. ,4rmy Corps of En�neers and S�ate of Oregor�Land Board, Division of St4re I,unds approvQls sha!!be ob�ained. The U.S Army Corps of Engineers and C'W'S permits are a�nel�e�. �t��,�:,�� 7• Where land form al�erateons und/or developrnenl are allowed within and Qdjacenllo the 100 year floodpl'ain, the G�ty shall reguire 1he considera�ion of dedicatron �f su�ciend open land area within and adjaceni lo the 1Toodplain in accordance wirh the Comprehensrve Plan. The parcel is ovmed by the City. Tl�e portion of the parccl along the floodplain is currenily being plaruled for park purposes. �yroWtiu4d No�,slun a pa,.l�Navra.w ertal400e 3 . N4TICE MATER IALS 4. NEIGHBQ RHO�D MEETING AGENDA NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING Re: Water Quality Facility - Hall Boulevard Improvements Wednesday, luly 30, 2003 Tigard City Hall - Town Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 6:30PM - 8:OOPM 1. Introduction of Staff 2. Review Purpose of Meeting 3. Explain Project - Using Exhibit 4. Questions and Answers 5. Wrap Up - Check on Sign-in NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING Re: Water Quality Facility - Hall Boulevard Improvements Wednesday, July 30, 2003 Tigard City Hall - Town Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 6:30PM - 8:OOPM This Neighborhood Meeting is being conducted as part of a Sensitive Lands Review(SLR) by the City of Tigazd. The City of Tigard is widening a portion of the Ease side of Hall Blvd. as a City and Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) requirement related to the Library construction project. Hall Blvd. is an ODOT facility. Drainage from the East side of Hall Blvd. cunently sheet-flows across the Library property into Fanno Creek. Construction of curbs and storm drainage on a portion of the project requires construction of a water quality facility and an outfall into Fanno Creek. A portion of the outfall extends into the floodway. Plans have already been approved by the Division of State Lands(DSL) and the Corps of Engineers. The required Service Provider Letter approving the storm drain and water quality system has been received &om Washington County Clean Water Services (CWS). Because a portion of this project extends into the floodway, a Type III Hearing Procedure is required by the City of Tigard. This involves a public hearing conducted by the Hearings Officer. Type III procedures call for a Neighborhood Meeting before proceeding with the Heazings Officer process. That's the purpose of our meeting this evening. A sign-up sheet will be kept detailing the names and address of all individuals who speak and comments, concerns or issues will be reviewed by the City and provided to the Hearings Officer. Please remember to sign-up. Sincerely, �� Marlin De as DeHaas & Associates, Inc. � - ---------- - - ----- �- — � July 11, 2003 V�1I� CITY OF TIG�►RD OREGON NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING RE: Water Quality Facility Dear Interested Party: The City of Tigard is the owner of property located at 13360 SW Hall Blvd., Tax Map 2S1 2DA lot 0600. We are requesting a Sensitive Lands Review for a proposed Water Quality Facility at this location. Before we apply to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, we would like to discuss the proposal in greater detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 Tigard City Hall - Town Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 6:30 PM - 8:00 PM Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. We look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at 503-639-4171 x 2460 if you have any questions. Sincerely, ��'�ha Vannie T. Nguyen, P.E. Engineering Manager ��enpvo07 7007 h ov�ra.en.e..r�v.nrneci�u.�aoo�w�esvMpWwnoa meeerq na�wa w��r Oua�M1�aour 7-bol ooc 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 - 5• NEIGHB oRHO oD MEETING AFFIDAVI TS � --� � �'�� .�� AF�IpAYITi OF MA��r�G/POSTlNG N�IGNBORHV�D MEETING NOTICE IMP4RT. NT NOTICE; THE APPLICANT IS REQUIR�D TO MAI! TNE tiTY OF TIGARQ A COPY OF TH�� I N�IGHSORH00p MEETING NOTICE THAT PERTAINS TO THIS AFFIDAYIT AT THE SAME TIME PR4PERTY �OWNERS AR� MAI�Ep NOTICE, TO TNE ADDRESS B�LOW: ,i City of Tigard Piannin� Division , (3125 SW Hall Soulevard I, Tigard, OR 97223-8189 �IN ApDITION, THE APPLItANT SHALL SUBMIT THIS AFFIDAYIT & CpPIES 4F ALL NOTICES AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION. MA1l.ING: i, ��G(�►1� � f I . �1[>,L�PX`�-S , be�ng duiy swom, depose and say that on the ��day of 20�, I caused to have mailea to each of the person on the tt he Ilst, a notice of a meeling to d�scu s a roposed aevelopment at(or near) j��(vU _�_�R Q�_��y�.� _ �S! .2�D�i O6 a copY of which notfce so malled is attached I�erelo and mada a part ot hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainl ad ressed to aid p,�{sons and were de osited on the date indicated above In the Un�ted States Post affice located at � LY �!p with postage prepafd thereon. Ignature {In th esence of a Notary Pubfic) POSTIN : !. "`li , ��;�� , do aff�rm that I am (represenl) the party inifiating interesi m a proposed � _ affecting the land located at (state the a roxi ate locatlon(s) IF no addrpss(s) andlor ta ot(s} curranNy r istorod} ___��311 �� SGt� <,��r� did on the 3� day of 20�� personally post notice indic2 �ng ;haf the site may be �.��;�osed for a ��,�,r�� [�_ appiicat on, ond �he llme, dale and �lace of a neighbcrr,�od medting to ciscu�s thB prQposal The sign was posted at _ ____��/ �}-� D�__ tt,t,�o .�i�l� S LGYI'l (state �ocation you posted notice on propeRy} S natura (In th presence of a Notary Public) (TNIS S�CTION FOR A STATE 0� �REGON, NOTARY PUBL.IC TO COMPLE'TEINOTARIZE) StAT� QF D/�' rm_. } County of wQ�h.�J� t�0yl ) ss. � � - Subscribed and svrdrn/a�rmed before me on the r�`I day of � , 20�. 4FF1ClAI.8�A1. OHEQI A C1A�TpM � r10Ta.FjY FUBLIC-d�AON � �� UOM�IIS3101/NQ 3�79�6 w co�,��sic�r,� t� _ ✓1� • . L—�lrl-S%�� -� M O�OT.t4 p008 NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREG�N __ M�Cammission Expires: lD - �n Q 3 Applicant, pleasa complote thv information bslow; ;\ P1A1vtE OF PROJECT OR PROP05ED DEVELOPMENT__�(� L , �� _ � TYPE OF PROPOSED D�VELOPMENT. � Addres�or General Loca6on ot Subject Property:_ __(t S�_ 5��u_ � _.-- SubjeCt Prop@rty Tax Map(s)and Lo;p(s) __ ?5( F?p14- -fXaPL�------------� _._--------- - - ._ .. __ . . __. . ___ — __ .. \ _ _ -___.—_ _. _._ __. —_ _ i i / July 11 , 2003 ' ��`� � CITY OF TIGARD OREGON NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING RE: Water Quality Facility Dear Interested Party: The City of Tigard is the owner of property located at 13360 SW Hall Blvd., Tax Map 2S1 2DA lot 0600. We are requesting a Sensitive Lands Review for a proposed Water Quality Facility at this location. Before we apply to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, we would like to discuss the proposal in greater detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 Tigard City Hall - Town Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 6:30 PM - 8:00 PM Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. We look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at 503-639-4171 x 2460 if you have any questions. Sincerely, ��t,+ Vannie T. Nguyen, P.E. Engineering Manager ��e�+ovoo>>oo�ti ouv,a.wa-..�.u nenecion anaoxneavK,00nw+ooa meee^o n�wa..>ie.w�Nr�aouy i lo ol ooc 13 I 25 S1N Hall 8lvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503}684-277? -- __ — -- — — - � _... �_ _..._ � � ....r e � , Y - - ' � � �<oa....,� ,..a.�.,,o. ...,.r - AREA ii0"EIF�� ' �� / \/ � � _ �� `�o��o� � (sod•) - � �, i / \ __��.��___-- , ,L � FO�; Diane �elderks �� -- \ Gty ot Tigard Eng. De��. ; � , . '�" .°°° � ; � R�: �S I�2aA, b�Q & � j °°�° �S I O�DD;r100_Z0� __ I � \� � _ m--, \ f Property owner lnformatlan I a..� Ls valid far 3 montl►a irom the data printed on ti►1s map. � \� � ,\ i . � - _°- �� ..,., . \ �� -; �, � i - `� � _ ,,\ .�, . � ,�� N , AlRw1 � ��p �°� O 200 �00 64: Ftol w�1�r a+...v.. /�QA� 1�.�57 h�t � 1��1 I7fOM� � _ a��l RO�r� � _ i "°_" c�cy or s��,a I - I I ___'__'____. ��rfxrnstnnonlAUG�'Yfwp�n�nllclllane�Vpw�a I _. .. ✓wl7bfve�NkdwChR.�D�v�bp,TnrtS[i.w��U�nrY. i 07 � Uu36wH.uB�.a ' i �� c, � ra.�o+� nu� f n. � csosle�P.,iti �. nvaxww.0 ra.a.� � •,mmifn�tv Oeveloomenl Pbt daEe:Jul 10. 2003;C 1ma9icW1AGIC�3 AP� ' . �_�:_� tj 1 :_'�1Fj_� Cj?:�l� I!f i.�,'r'�� pi j.! ! 102PQ-0 io2PD•00000 13 02 TITIQN PI1�T C� G AR�ES W a F LOTS 1 b 2 158 ALL IARD.O 7223 � 251020Q-01200 2S102DA-00o80 AMARIR JEANNE M AUMAN 8 �IKREM A AMARIR AHMED Pp B�X 82624 13615 SW HALL BLVD PORTLAND,OR 81282 + TIGARD,OR 97223 � 2S 10200-0t500 2S 102Ap�0300 I BIICK CARL J DONA JEAN FANNO PQINTE LLC a�ao swo�� tos�,sr �srti sr TIGARD,OR 97223 VANCOWER,WA 97880 I 2St 02DA-00900 231010401200 CfiARBONNEAU LARRY 6 FIELOS FREO W I WELSFi ROBIN 1149 SW DAVENPORT 13337 SW►{Al.l.�LW PORTUWQ.OR 97201 7�GARO.OR A7223 I � S1�PL�ootoo 25t0YR0-05600 C OF RD HERRERA JUAN& 131 I-{ALL�LVp OROKE GABRIELA ARD,O 7223 t3705 SW HA�L TIGARO,OR 97223 2 t02D0-00 ' 25�02DD-0t603 CIT GARD H011ANO RONALD P MARY l 131 ALI.BLVD 8850 SW EOGEWO00 T ARQ,OR 7223 TIGARQ.OR 97223 o�-�a 25t�2P0dt�oo CI ARD FiOLSTEIN MARVIN R/LORErTA R TRS 131 BLVD A710 SW OMN�A ARO,OR 97 TIGIWp,OR 97223 2S 101 DOd 120 t 2S 10100�00600 COE MANUFACTURING CO THE JEMPAK PARTNERS LLC P O B�X 52d 7034 SW B3R0 AVE PAIfVESVILI.E,OH 44Q77 PORTLANp,pR 87223 zs+0200-00002 25 t ozno-0t oa� COLLiNG Cti{1RLES .IENSEN QAVID L AN��ois C 8878 SW EpGEW00D S7 6840 SW EOGEW00� TIGARp,OR 87223 TIGARO,OR 97223 2S 102pp-ppgp� 25102�0-01300 COLLING CHARLES yy KRAEMER JULIA A 3 MARK W 13835 SW HALL PO BOX 80665 TiGARp,OR 97223 P�RTI_AND.OR 97280 � �i,=;. �i l� �'�=u=�; i��:d�' I li_i.�.','i-i p��, 251020D-0t804 - 02pA-0070a ' LASNIEYYSKI WILLIAM L AND TIG C F TERESA A 1312 l 886Q SW EOGE1h10Qp ARD,OR 3 T(GARO,OR 97223 251�20A.001D� 2 o2QA-0040 MAGNO LLC TIG 0 dF 8800 SW COMi1r1�RICAL ST 131 L TiGARD,Oa 9)223 ARO,OR 223 2S1�2Rp415o1 2 02DA � O'FARRELL WILUAM�d PEGGY JO 1'1G D OF 331! E INERCER 13� ��q�� SEATTLE.WA 98112 ARD.0 97223 � ' YS102DD-0S700 2 -OO1ot R�uTFi�R nE8s1� T7G oF � 1�90o SW,iAMES C7 131 w l. TIGAR�,OR 97223 r �1R0,OR 3 ( 2S1Q2pA-0o800 2 O7AA�o20 SCHAI.TZ RANOY A&MARGARET C TIG OF 13335 5W HALL BLVD 131 L � TIGARO.OR 91'224 ARO,OR 7223 1 2S102pA�090o 4 02DD-003 SCHRAMM MJN M TI 0 Y OF do K1M WIIL�AM YOSHIO 8 13t �. NiMA VO Rp,� 97223 I 8770 SW BURNHAM ST ( 71C,AR0,QR e7223 �1�� 25t020A-00300 I SOIJIRES HOM�S l.L C YIGARa-TU/u.AYIN SCHOOL 8Y NORRIS BEGGS 6 S�MPSON DISTRICT 23J �WW SVC DEFT ATTN:Bt1S�MESS MANAGER 121 SW MORaISON p200 69a0 SW SlWpBURG ST IPORTLAND,OR 97204 TIGARD,OR 97223 �1�2�1 t� 2S10200-0t800 SOLIS EpGAR 7RUSYEE 71NNIN R08ERT O EIAiNE M � PO BOX7�1�g3 8876 SW EflGEYVO�D STREET TIGARD,OR 97261 TIGARD,Oa 97223 2S102fl0-01301 2St0200-01002 STATE OF OREGON TOKUOA KAZUHIOE ANO OEPARTMENT OF TRASPORTAT�ON CAROL LYN RIGt17 OF WAY SECTION 8870 SW EDGEWdOD ST 417 TFtANSPORTATION 6LDG TIGARD,OR 97223 SALEM,OR 97310 2S102Rq-0p7oi TIGARp CHRISTlAN CNURCN ��tos sw��etw 71GARD,OR 97223 � Jack Biethan 11�23 SW Summe�eld Qrive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Kristen Miller 8940 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 97223 Paul Owen 10335 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224 � Tim �sau PO Box 230695 Tigard, 4R 97281 Nathan and Ann Murdock P4 Sox 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 � Ross Sundberg 16382 SW 104th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 srian Wegener 9830 SW Kimberly Drive Tigard, OR 97224 J. Dyar 10430 SW Century �ak Drive Tigard, QR 97224 Rex Caffall 13205 SW Village Glenn ' Tigard, OR 97223 Josh Thomas 10395 SW Bonanza Tigard, OR 97224 CITY OF TIGARD - SOUTH Cfl SUB(OMHITTEf (pg i ol I) (i�lcurp�nlsetupllabefslClT South.doc) UPDATED: J�me 18, 2003 , 1��.'�1!�✓Jt_tz ��;_l� I Jri.E�7C� pr�r, Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 � Sue Rorman ' 11250 SW 82�Avenue Tigartl, OR 97223 � Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78�'Avenue I Tigard, OR 97223 IMichael Tri ob I g off 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigard, �R 97223 � Dieter Jacobs � 7775 SV11 Spruce Sfreet Tigard, OR 97223 I Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard I Tigard, OR 97223-6210 � David Chapman 9840 SW l.andau Place I Tigard, OR 97223 , Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 � Brad Spring I 7555 SW Spruce Street Tgard, OR 97223 � � CITY OF TIGARD - Easi cir suacoMMirrEE �i:lcurpinlsetupllabelslClT East doc) UPDATED: April 18, 2002 MINUTES NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING Re: Water Quality Facility - Hall Boulevard Improvements Wednesday, July 30, 2003 Tigard City Hall - Town Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 6:30PM - 8:OOPM The neighborhood meeting was convened at the time and location above. The agenda followed is enumerated below: 1. Introduction of Staff 2. Review Purpose of Meeting 3. Explain Project - Using Exhibit 4. Questions and Answers 5• Wrap Up - Check on Sign-in The meeting was conducted by Marlin DeHaas representing DeHaas & Associates, Inc., the consultarlt for the Hall Boulevard improvement project, and Vannie Nguyen, Engineering Manager for the City of Tigard. As indicated on the sign-in sheet, only two interested parties came to this meeting. 1. Brian Wegener, Watershed Watch Coordinator, Tualatin Riverkeepers 16507 S W Roy Rogers Road, Sherwood, OR 97140 (503) 590-5831 Brian provided the following written comments: Here is a summary of my comments on the water quality facility for the Hall Blvd. widening; 7/31/03 Water quality manhole should include oil separation as well as a sediment trap. Native wetland vegetation is preferred over lawn in the bioswale. CWS standards for water quality facilities have less capacity for flow and treatment than in all other areas of the Northwest. Water quality facilities should be sized to reduce stormwater pollution to the "maximum extent practicable" and should be sized based upon more appropriate standards such as those for Clark County Washington or urban Clackamas County outside the Tualatin basin (CCSD #1). . � Infiltration should be a greater part of stormwater treatment in order to lessen the hydrological impact on Fanno Creek. The pre-development handling of stormwater from Hall Blvd. (sheet drainage across the meadow) provides significantly more infiltration than the proposed piped system with a manifold discharge into Fanno Creek. Studies by NOAA fisheries around Puget Sound indicate that stormwater runoff is killing pre-spawning Coho Salmon. Criteria for design of water yuality facilities should go beyond phosphorus reduction. And one additional comment. Metro's Greenstreets Manual describes innovative treatment of street runoff that should be considered for the Hall Blvd. widening. Thanks for the opportunity to comment. Stop muddy water. Ask me for a free copy of our guides to erosion prevention and sediment control for construction sites and agriculture. 2. Ron Holland, 8850 SW Edgewood Street, Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 620-3854 Ron had no specific comments related to water quality facility but did ask some general questions or comments as follow: Ron indicated he was paying fees to ihe City for storm drainage, but the City wasn't fixing his problems. Vannie indicated he should call Public Works. Ron asked about the Wall Street LID and Marlin and Vannie explained the project goals, status and financing. All were advised that there would be the required SOOft. notification of the formal hearing on the water quality facility before the Hearings Officer. , � i'�� ,/' ('�/� i� Marlin J. D aas 7/30/03 cc: 02.644.118 . v D E HAAS Suifc 30U - AG(: Ccnlcr �c vs .. 9-350 S«'Commcrcc Circic '�' ' ' ' � 1Vilsom•illc, OR.97070 . �. . . . � {. (503) G8Z-2450 ��' SS�C�C�les, I nc. (503)682-4018 Fax fc Co�sukingEnQneers 6 Surveyas August 6, 2003 Brian Wegener Tualatin Riverkeepers 16507 S W Roy Rogers Road Sherwood, OR 97140 Re: Water Quality Facility - Hall Boulevazd Improvements Dear Brian: Thank you for your contribution to our Neighborhood Meeting held 7/30/03. We have received your written comments of 7/31/03 and they will be submitted to the City as part of our Land Use Application. The Neighborhood Meeting was a City code requirement associated with our submittal for a Sensitive Lands Review. There will be a public heazing before the City's Hearings Officer, who is authorized to issue the Sensitive Lands Permit under the Type II1 process. We have no DSL/COE objection to the proposed work. We have received the appropriate Service Provider Letter required from Water Environment Services (WES). With respect to your comment about vegetation of the bioswale, we did not have an exhibit of our planting plan at the Neighborhood Meeting. We are attaching Sheet 22 of our Hall Blvd. construction plan which illustrates a more elaborate planting plan than I may have inferred at the meeting. With respect to your comment suggesting an oil separator be added, that is not a requirement of WES and WES has approved the water quality plan as submitted. Please let us know if we can provide you other pertinent information about the project. Sincerely, _ �� Marlin J. DeHaa"s, ., P.L.S. President cc: 02.644.118 Attachments Vannie Nguyen - City of Tigard 6441tr.806 SIGN IN SHEET � FOR Water Quality Facility - Hall Blvd Improvements City of Tigard - Town Hall 6/30/03 - 6:30 - 8:00 PM NAME ADDRESS CITY/STATE/ZIP PHONE 1. �� /� C GL. q� 4 � J� �, i�/ .�r2 o d d � _ � � T i 5 �cr� C�� z23 (020 3�� 2. t �ah � ��,�' � � So� sw ►20� �o e;S 1(�, _s ��.r-„�o�d 9?I 0 -S� i 3 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. �.,,«.. 6. SERVICE PR �VIDER LETTER . � � File Number C;leai�Wate� Services �g� �- Our co�nmitmcnt is cicar. � Clean Water Services Service Provider Letter Jurisdiction Tigard Date July 23, 2003 Map & Tax Lot _2S102D000300 600 Owner City of Tiqard – Vannie Nquyen Site Address East of SW Hall Blvd, Contact Pacific Habitat Services South & west of Fanno Ck. Address 9450 SW Commerce Cir, 180 Proposed Activity Expansion of Hall Blvd Wilsonville, OR 97070 Phone 503-570-0800 This form and the attached conditions will serve as you� Service Provider Letter in accordance with Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (R80 03-11). --- —� — YES NO YES I NO Natural Resources � Alternatives Analysis Assessment (NRA) � � Required � � Submitted __ (Section 3.02.6) District Site Visit � � � ❑ ❑ Date: f Tier 1 Alternatives Analysis - � � Concur with NRA/or —j— � f � submitted information � � � Tier 2 Alternatives Analysis � � , , � � - -- 9 ; Sensitive Area Present � ; ; � , � ; Ve etated Corridor y � � On-Site � i Averaging i ❑ ❑ � �— I � -- — -- ; , ; "_"_ I i Sensitive Area Present i � Vegetated Corridor � � Off-Site � ' ❑ j Mitigation Required ❑ ;— -' —r--- — --- --- ;---- - — Vegetated Corridor I I � ; Present On-Site � � � On-Site Mitigation j � i Width of Vegetated—� Corridor(feet) -- 50 feet Off-Site Mitigation � � Condition of Vegetated Planting Plan Attached � Corridor � Degraded � IEnhancement Required ; EnhancemenUrestoration ! (Mitigation area only) � � ❑ completion date I 11/15/03 ----- — I Encroachment into ; � ' Vegetated Corridor i � � RSAT(no longer required) � � I � (Section 3.02.4) i � -------f---- � Type and Square Footage � 1,218sf Geotechnical Report � � of Encroachment L water quality swale required — ------- j- - AUowed Use � � ❑ (Section 3.02.4.b.2) I Conditions Attached � � This Service Provider Letter does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered on your property. Page 1 of 3 � File Nurnber C 1�-1--� In order to comply with Clean Water Services (the District) water quality protection requirements the project must comply with the following conditions: 1 No slructures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, uncontained areas of hazardous materials as defined by Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, pet wastes, dumping of materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted within the sensitive area which may negatively impact water quality, except those allowed by Section 3.02.3.b. 2. No slructures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, uncontained areas of hazardous rnaterials as defined by Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, pet wastes, dumping of materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted within the vegetated corridor which may negatively impact water quality, except those allowed by Section 3.02.4.b.2). 3. The vegetated corridor width for sensitive areas within the project site shall be a minimum of 50 feet wide, as measured horizontally from the delineated boundary of the sensitive area. 4. Prior to any site clearing, grading or construction the vegetated corridor and water quality sensitive areas shall be surveyed, staked, and temporarily fenced per approved plan. During construction the vegetated corridor shall remain fenced and undisturbed except as allowed by Section 3.02.5.a and per approved plans. 5. Prior to any activity within the sensitive area, the applicant shall gain authorization for the project from tf�e Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL) and US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) The applicant shall provide the District with copies of all DSL and USACE project authorization permifs DSUUSACE permit authorization required. 6. The applicant is proposing to culvert a 3.5-foot section of open stream ( a small area between two existing culverts). Mitigation for this activity shall include "daylighting" 15 feet of stream channel currently within a culvert. This shall create new vegetated corridor which shall be enhanced, either as part of this project or the Fanno Point Development. 7. For vegetated corridors 50 feet wide or greater, the first 50 feet closest to the sensitive area shall be equal to or better than a "good"corridor condition as defined in Section 3.02.7, Table 3.2. 8. An approved Oregon Department of Forestry Notification is required for one or more trees harvested for sale, trade, or barter, on any non-federal lands within the State of Oregon. 9. Clean Water Services shall be notified 72 hours prior to the start and completion of enhancement/restoration activities. Enhancementlrestoration activities shall comply with the guidelines provided in Landscape Requirements (R&0 03-11:Appendix D). 10. Prior to installation of plant materials, all invasive vegetation within the vegetated corridor shall be removed. During removal of invasive vegetation care shall be taken to minimize impacts to existing native trees and shrub species. 1 1. Enhancement/restoration of the vegetated corridor shall be provided in accordance with the attached planting plan and R&O 03-11, Appendix D. Prior to any site clearing, grading or construction, the applicant shall provide the District with the full required construction plans for vegetated corridor enhancemenUrestoration in compliance with R80 03-11. �Z� Maintenance and monitoring requirements shall comply wifh Section 2.11.2 of R80 03-11. IF at any time during the warranty period the landscaping falls below the 80% survival level, the Owner shall reinstall all deficient planting at the nexi appropriate planting opportunity and the two year maintenance period shall begin again from the date of replanting. Page 2 of 3 � File Number . �� 13. Performance assurances for the vegetated corridor shall comply with Section 2.06.2, Table 2-1.4 and Section 2.10, Table 2-22. 14. Appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's)for Erosion Control, in accordance with the CWS Erosion Control Technical Guidance Manual shall be used prior to, during, and following earth disturbing activities. 15. Prior to construction, a Stormwater Connection Permit from the District or its designee is required pursuant to Ordinance 27, Section 4.B. 16. The District or City/County may require an easement over the vegetated corridor conveying storm, surface water management, and/or sanitary sewer rights to the District or City that would prevent the owner of the vegetated corridor from activities and uses inconsistent with the purpose of the corridor and any easements therein. 17. Activities located within the 100-year floodplain shall comply with Section 3.13 of R&O 03-11. 18. Removal of native,woody vegetation shall be limited to the extent practicable. 19• The water quality swale and detention pond shall be planted with District approved native species, and designed to blend into the natural surroundings. 20. The proposed water quality swale encroaches into the vegetated corridor by the amount allowed by averaging, although no development is currently proposed. However,this is an allowed use and no alternative analysis is required, therefore the encroachment meets the Design and Construction Standards. 21. Final construction plans shall clearly ciepict the location and dimensions of the sensitive area and the vegetated corridor(indicating good, marginal, or degraded condition). Sensitive area boundaries shall be marked in the field. 22. Final construction plans shall include landscape plans. Plans shall include in the details a description of the methods for removal and control of exotic species, location, distribution,condition and size of plantings,existing plants and trees to be preserved,and installation methods for plant materials. Plantings shall be tagged for dormant season identlflcation. Tags to remain on plant material after planting for monitoring purposes. 23. A Malntenance Plan shall be included on flnal plans Including methods, responsible party contact information, and dates(minimum two tlmes per year� by June 1 and September 34). 24• Should final development plans differ significantly from those submitted for review by the District, the applicant shall provide updated drawings, and if necessary, obtain a revised Service Provider Letter. Please call (503) 846-3613 with any questions. ��-� � Heidi K. Berg Site Assessment Coordinator Attachments (1) . Page 3 of 3 � V > ^ � � � + Z � ~ � � � �� , ;� � ; � o m Icn �' i � � � i o � - -- - n Aoo l-n..skA2�,�� n r,a� I ��. ' I� ^ - ~A��, ��—_ —_=—�.�______--L_n ,ac� I � p�� - � �_ J+av � =. .L_ n ,� � 4 � Q -_ __ _ - ----� =� � �- ''m—6�00�==---�' �_ n �o, W � =�- .___-- - �-+... - � _ ��_�.__`_I __ _ n e� �' � �a 71 sq� i ro.q� � =+ - '\ .. .... � �� /lrq� ~_ T---��. � �/M' . �'" .. .......... �..... �• � � �F- _ f � ��,� • _ ' i .�ocation ofCu/vert n Jc� i � n zcb � �� _ - '�_ _ �J�` to be Qxtended � � i n ,� n 6� i f _ _ I � I 1 � FANNO PO/NTE � � � f, L"""�';`� ,�,��'"�D� I \ n� — , � �erm_ ''"�a. IDEl/ELOPMENT r � ROPOS D T/GARD `u'"�- �� 1 i��i L/BRARY�/TE I � � i App�oximate Location I I � � ot P�oqosed Bioswa/e i � I � I � LEGEND I I I j �� /� Sidewalk II ii � i i APproximate Location � Landscaping i i i f ofFanno Creek --�� I `1 , 1, � � � � ti � � �� /, � � � I �, � � � � � �0 160 360 \ � � $CAI.F. IN FF..PT FIGURE Location of the Hall Boulevard widening project (base map provided by 271� 2 DeHaas and Associates, 2003). s/�a/o3 Pacific Habitat Services, I11C. PHS � . Fxiat CB � � � � � � � � ' � � � � �Sto 2t77.JJ,�?3.SS'RT Constrvef� � � • • Crote 156.?J � � � . • • - • � • ; , • , • . . . , p � : bondo�. .. . . . . �ODOT in/st CC.1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a --£X/57. f' 'Ho// Bhd.• • '£�ist� We ond � (J � :. PIPE . . . . . . . � . . :�: . . . . . � � . . . � . . . �1 � iE—�so.�� i�-j's�;�,�; • . . , . . . . . . � �;:eCe J i: . . . . . . ' . ' , " , ' ; ' ; • . . . : cruts �s5.�Q � : : . ' : : : : : : : ' : ; : : ' : : : . . . . •UTARY?O £xist CB ' Crots �se.� Q ' ' , ; ` ' � � ` ' " � � • � p CREEK . . . . . . . �E ,so..ra . . . : : : . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . 44 cu. yd. of " ' • . ' " : ; " " ' ' � • • � � � � � ` Uplandtobe � l£ J5J.9J I • . . . . . . . � , , , , ; ; ; ; ; ; ` ; , ' � � � � 'Remove�sxrst.� � Excavated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .�B�Sl/. Cu/vrrt. • O : � � . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ` . . : .�?e4c0?rrN4t_chonn � to Extend '?4'•C76-✓' ` �.V/ �t/opst in • Remowe Cu/aert � ` ; , `Concrots Cuf��rt' ' ' • • • • • • • pipe o w oroo� � • • • • • Channel . . �S� O.OJ10' • • • • • • • •to b� ?: :L:4C��D'C4�3��k, �X S:� ft: . . . ..: : : : : Previously ?+- c�� « ,r . . . . . . �R bY�8':��d� � :C�71y� rts Identified � . . . . . . . IE 152.09 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . as the � Fanno Pointe � Project 12'curc «�� 0 Bu ffer /E /S1.Jf �/J ,� ,{�y 33.�5 N nm 136.9? � N � I � , � / � o to so � SCALE IN FggT I FIGURE Culvert extension and associated buffer for the tributary to Fanno Creek 2�ii 3 for the Hall Boulevard widening project (base map provided by DeHaos and s/�4/o3 Associotes, Inc., 2003). Pacific Habitat Services,IIIC. PHS � � I n : \ � � � 1 �J` �� _----- � , I \1 �� _ ,�-ot guffer � � � i �- --� ��o � � -- " / r-3 ' � � � � �--' � � - l � g I \ / _136 r � � I � � � '— \ � � � I � `� � / � � . . — � � Buffer Impact � f - -- � � �-- J � \ / ( 1218 sf) I a.2• x z4� � J r � � . . � � ' �/"�p\ . . � Cu�t�x Blonkst o, m � ��. . dge. of Fanno • ek �, �?" E �,c,,, � I � � .k:��'fl��'r • I Q ��. � ,�e P.� ' � �{��-�' ! .... �'�. Z � .;-::::�:,--,;. �4� G/ �''w�7lC.�'�. . I � � � or,�o � Y..,:ff ` i ` . . — . �,.�� Otti�ALl S\TURE ��. f J X � U�\ O IE�139�6Sf � � � , 4S �� r� A L � 00' �,G 1 - � � I � S `°` �� ... ..: ' � eU�fO-O_t � � � I I \ � P, ; :.....;:: f f�r -_ � .:........ _ _ � ... N IE OUT� 141.9 6 �.�� DITpi IN ' ....:: '..:....:.... .. .... ....:.... =0'�� : : •;. . IE IN-140.35 I � �1. IE WT-140,35\ �- \ � I A \ \ ♦�/ !�'"f—�� _ ` ` l � EO �0 EO 2'X8'X18' I _� \ CLASS SO RIA RAP I SC� IN �� FIGURE Buffer impacts for the Hall Boulevard widening project (base map z�i� 4 provided by DeHaas and Associates, Inc., 2003). s/�a/o3 Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. PHS � � ------ ---— — ----- — -- — -- ----- i - - � - - - - - - - - - - - -� - -:- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � � � ' ' .t % ' I — - - - - � �. r :��b:�:�:�:��:��:�:�:�:��•��. � P R 0 J E C T B 0 U N DA R Y � ��:�� _ i + - � � � CWS NATIVE BUFFER ENNANCEMENT � ' . + • . . . + + gUFFER PLAN7ING MATRIX ♦ a ♦ ♦ r a f � � ' ' ` ` ` t ' � � � - 5EE DIAGRAM BELOW FOR TYPICAL PlAN71NGS I O ' -. I ' + + a + r � + ♦ •;•;- 'I Plant Material ` Botanicol Name Common Name � O . . : - .'.' 7otal B Plot Notes I . _ , •y'•'� � Trees 3 Gal. Cont •;•; ' 280 10 O : �; ' a� A/nus ru6ra Red Alder 140 5 8 O.C. � - �',' . ' �� F�axinus lofifolra Ore on � , . _ , , 1218 SF—BIOSWAL.E . � � �h 140 5 12 O.C. . . . . . . . . ., . . . ,. . ,�.. . . . . . . O OUTFAL.L MITIGATIQN AR -- '�.' ' . � � � ' _- • .�.; �Y , •;y ' Shrubs 1 Cal. Cont. 532 19 ' Q ' . •,•,• � �• � hd Holodrscus disco%� Oceons ro 112 4 9' O.C. ' > .'. . . • : . •'••`� _ ' -_ � � Rosa noco a Baldhi Rose 140 5 6 , � ��' ". •'.•�s � Sambu O.C. `1 cus racemosa Red Elderber 140 5 5 O.C. P° .� � _ . . •�' . . . ' _ •?•'•'.�•• • - S m horica os o/bus Snowbe 140 � J Z ' . : ; _� 5 5 O.C. , . ; •, ��`� SW OMARA a ` "'' - =-- , . ' •�• ` Emer ents 62 2.22 , S� _ � � ' -- � � •p � I Achilleo mrllefolium Westem Yarrow 2 0.07 1 Ib. acre � � 3 .1 �;:. �� _ ' Bromus carinotus Native Cali(ornia Broma 17 0.61 10 Ibs. acre � � - - `� � ' ��•��'• E!mus /oucus Blue �Id e 15 0.54 9 Ibs. acre �� ♦ .•.'1il: � Lu inus bicolor Two—color Lu ine 14 0.50 8 Ibs. acre � � } ► ' � ' ' Lu rnus ol h lus Lar e—leaFed Lu ine 14 0.50 B Ibs. acre i - p �i �� p - ' . ` + I LOCATION AND GROUPING OF PIANT MATERIALS SHOWN I •� `f'r• -� � £ s y.< ' ' BELOW IS FOR EXAMPLE ONLY. SI7E CONDITIONS WILL � . ` r\��,•��'j � �t .,1 1 t � i��`` �� DETERMINE BEST LAYOUT OF PLANT MATERIAL a:..:�'.r. oY�r t .1 �� I I I I °' -{'•' ,�� ' FANNO CREEK I ' r � . j• 't�'•� I Z � a� --- � � � `. 7 ��• �'�� ' O� ar � fl •� FIn ' SHRUBS IN GNDUVS ' . � . ' • _ .. . .•. i•.•. �W �• . OF 3-7 � U� O . I _ � a .-� :'_ .-_ . C � �• ; . � w� o r '�' rn�w craouvs � , �• I >m `n fl � hd� � hd oF a-s I �. �: _ � n hd hd hd .� . _ I 3 fl d or "cao��s vw sru+ I , � . ,•. r ; v �. . . nr or vr �caon vtnts ^ �• - . .:: i�� ' A0.JA.CENT PlOT 7YPICAL BUFFEFt PLOT AD,IACENT PLOT � . � .'f�� i ' 51.0 Ia� '' ° �- .'. ' ' '` " '.• �K� OPEN FIELD � C�•. �� ;~"' � � � I . y'�:�:�. 'j l � � 1 � "Q �' � � � , -a o. _:;: _ .- ; � . . .- -.MCMx` I ' • • � ' ' .' .. ... ... . � � , .. ,.�. 'rr,/- '�v:a ' ... . . . - v � � � . ._' _ ' '-�::,�.�1 � _ � o � ,� � � — - - - - - - - - - - - - � ,-- - - - - - - - _ J . �� - - - - -- - -- - - - �- - - scer.s ar Fsgr 2�ii FIGURE s��a�o3 Location of proposed buffer mitigotion for the bioswale as identified on the planting plan (base map provided by Greenworks, 2003). ��rHS �� Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. 7. PRE-APP LICATIO N C�NFERE NCE 8. PLANS � . ! ` � Nk( CITY � F TIGARD " �� I ti ' � �"< R� 09, _ 0 RE C�0 N �TM o�oT� . � � Y PLANS FOR PROPOSED PROJECT � - _ � N MAY. 2003 e.u+no.s � � srnccr �,f` . � Q � t �� SIP[[� YCapNµfl BUIl YOUNiAN Rp BpM1A �p HALL BOULEVARD Y �� $ �w � INDEX OF SHEETS Street, Storm Drainage 8, Utility improvements N�� "`°' � �x�� raic�ac sECnoNS (Regina Lane t(? Existing Bridge) 2 (Cl� CRAD/NG & E/7rJ5/ON CONTROL PLAN I � VICINITY MAP PRO✓ECr , .T (L 1) PL4N c4' PROFILE (f�L4LL BLVD).• STA 1 f 16.73 TO STA St80 4 (L2J PLAN dr PROf7Y£ (KALL BLVD): STA StBO TO STA 10f60 5 (LJ) PLAIV �r PROf7LE (/fqLL BLVD): STA 10f60 TO STA 11t40.14 6 (Cl) CONS7RUCTlON DETA/LS 7 (C2) CONSTRUC7XJN D£TA/LS � e (c.�� coivsrxucnoN oEracs j 9 (C4) CON57RUCAON DET.4/LS � 10 (O1) W4J�R OUAL/7Y FAC/L/T1ES PL4N '' >> (u�) unurr Punr (PCE� i �z (uz> unurr Pcav (PCE) Fq N 1 J (U.TJ U77L/IY PLAN (PGE� �O C r4 �u4� /LLUM/i1G4TION PLAN � R��L 15 (USJ /LLUM/NATION PLAN \ � '� 16 (U6J fUTURE S/GNAL CONDU/T PLAN ` � � 17 (Sl) S/CN/NC ,4N0 STR/P/NG PL4N � 18 (S2J S/CN/NC LEGEND p � � . 19 (LS1J /RR/G4AON P(AN (/�A(L BL liD) STA 1 t 16.7.I TO STA 6f50 � 20 (LS2J /RR/G4AON PLAN (f�ALL BLVDJ STA 6t50 TO STA 11+40.14 � � m 21 (LS3� PLANANC PLAN (KALL BLVD) STA 1 t 16.7.� TO STA 6t50 0 M A R A S T 22 (LS4) PLANANG PLAN (K4LL BLVD) STA 6t50 TO STA 11+40.14 J ZJ (LSSJ /RR/GAT10N DETA/�S J 24 (L56J PLANANC DETA/LS = 0'MARA ST s N R E G I N A I BENCHMARK ED G E W 0 0 D S T �•,�:��.� .:,o��,,��o ,o,N,d�„ o,. o, u�. Abrrn.ear rnn,er o�sw NoI ewd.vwd d s,r eu.nncm S7�NL I� diy('i1 STOIIyOQO YJIY Q�IIG4IPO SUIMY C�� - n11 I/I1'VI%OVI O/1 IAI dt.� �J I�.IS O/ID if /iwn /he Tqortf vsif,ico/Ns1rwA: � A�T[NIIQry; (}eyp� /0�requvp� �py �p /ppo�Nl��odopled by � fAa psyyi Ut)i!r Nolificoflon C'nfr. 1ho:e iulea w� sa1 lorfh O.IR 93I-00l-OpiO tA�oupA OAR 957-001-0090 1'ou may ��Q,� vaorcrava�o�rn.flw�.�vlwov,�er. Dfoln copie� c/�h�iyr�� Dy cdlinq Ih� ca,ie.. £xp. J?/Jl/OJ VAHHIE i. NGVYCH, P.E. CI TY OF TIGARD Nol�: !hr fdeph •numbor Iw M�(k pED VR0! $ul�}00 - ACC CeMu (j O f nntr h(SpJ)?J?-1987). '9a" Ufilty NoGncotfon 9 c��'t / � s�so s.w.c«�,�. crde �� G DEHAAS � ` � *� °�'"�'�`""""`D' ENGINEERINC DEPARTMENT CALL BEFORE YOU D!C'i �`?S ��4' �'�" � Misorrn�e.Aepon 97070 � �-800-332-2344 � �y- �7 �V � a & o,,R 13125 S.w. HALL BLVD. ldi i,� ssociates Inc. � � , c iIGARD. ORGON 9722J '�.^„.•��,s t L � 1 �h �NO � —��$TD•3�O�i �`� vO�CE: 503-639-417� ConeulUn Eo ioeen k Sune on T dy .,o,cu w — ____. ��NJ.o�"' M, vHONE: (so3) 6B7-a�5o �" � FAX: 503-684-7297 ... .----_- ___ _______._.___ fAX: 682-�018 avua �e/aie. -_ M�e �� WWW.CI.TICARD.ORUS . - -- --- - - - - - - - --- ------ - --- -- -- -- GENERAL NOrES i ,I i • � , I - - ---- - --- -- - -- --- - � � � � - - - --- — _ --- ---- i O/, P�otect o!! t�ees on sile. i i �� I ^.y9 I ORAW�NC PLOTTED AT � � \ - i ^o�__- LALF-�TH£ NOTED SCALE ! , '�� SECTION A-A - E , 22' x24' � \ I F�� O a D� � . � , - ,QG�ler BIOnk�l plonled wilh � �\ . notive herboceous seed m�K� VARIES "� � o � � ' . I , - � � ' � red-os�er dogNnod ond f-.. �,. GONSTRUCTJON NOT S � � J � � V ; u � � w�llow stokes to m`��,;�e . �� 4 1 � _ m ±N o o r �,05�0�. _ 7 � 2. l O Nof Used. a I"'- � p°�D �� i O P OF BANK � � � fA W DW V_ Q N � ' �Si \ \. _ �..,��_.. J o^ p \ � ' �� _� �' OZ Conslruct waler qualily swo/e. U R I �N�:,n � � �/ C � ,o� O=� O \' ' � ,�t�Il�wat[icb.S swl O Conslruct drtch in/et. See Deloil B ond C. . ��c�z � ��q x��n / � *a. ' • � FANNO CREEK �"`-v��r.�.t I � �°'x°b ae°� ~ � \ z aiu��.rt.o�a o��. 4 Connecl to new sfo�m sewer in stree�. Begin wale p � \ �w��t� quoJity /acility bid item. o -#' � � � � ,,, „�, ��µ�u � � � � � /f � . cv.ic.o�s o�.c ir aa n �� •r� SO Cons��uct inlel llowpod, Iull widfh oI chonnel. � +� � � \ �*r J � 0� � L 12� Monifold \ �� «•�x Y�ii v � �F 20' long w/10 each 6"■ I � \ AoK'a,,,�,a O Reseed swofe o/ter g�oding. See londscape plons. � o 0 o f � • �`L�k� outlet p�pes O 2' OC '�°^O'�M6�r.•o Q � � wv�nuc�ro..oan N U. l �an.o os ur.na O7 Insloll sedimentory monhole. See Detail D. � � I i �n��y��w�, Rim= f 145.00, lE in= 141.23, lf out= 741.15 I 8�� rred B I 0' .s o r.,.,sa,.m Sump= 134.73. �S� _ e e�q .en DITCN INLEi _ � I IN=140.35 I �� °-°� � � � I�WT=140.35 � O8 Locote ond obondon existing well wifh conc�e�e �� ' m� �`T Wi in acco�donce with pregon Wa(er 3�� \ '^" Resources �equiremenls. (By Others) - . I I • \ I M I � EROSIOy CONTROL FENCINC T- 9O Hydroseed ony dlstur6ed a�eas nof covered by � � � � / ,,, londscaping plons. � � ` \ � _ �- �� .� �� __ � � i Co��'�-� _ �- A \ ( � _ �=.�: .� . .� + IE IN 141.23 I ��1�0 YR FL000 PLAIN •�� ° IE �=141.1� _ I �`�'�`�'� „ I �,SEClldl A-A p C V � N� - � � \ CL SS�50 RIP RAP ' i . � I � I �z. I " ' � _ - �- - IE=1a0.76 � WATER QUALITY - - fOG - J 51.7 Lf \ I I n..«..c.,o s,5 MANHOLE Oon�t'�r�Swioa 65.47 lF W� Suspecr u51 � i °"�"" a� * - � 50' 10+1 �Y C76-V ConcS=0.0123 � � vpc I t - ° 1E o r- ,a�.aa s=i oz Q .� ;< � k�cacE i°=2 ' DETAI! D �� —�� ,�� _ � � � � --- - --- -� - -- — �� _-•••- SEC110M A-A R/�2• _ � � �w�.w�..rt �' 1f8 PUE - -- - - __ _ �,� L J�-�1— Y [ydt� _` Existing ound o -- --� `�� J -l� � � � �.w c 144 � 65.� CF12" 76-V� -- �� .° o �.,,.� •—� I:J (Typ) � �— � ` ° e :f�� o SECTION 8-B 140 = �•�09 J ftom o/ wo/e ` y - - � -� o � '. /� . ..... �' 140 l m ! 'PVC 5= .Ol � •'T•�d�M�•+ 31. LF 12" C76-V c c. r ; r � m - ��n,w a Nr ^ S= 0.0/23 � �'T6' -- ^ � ' • ��..� �� "• �_.•..�.. . .. h � O E/ev. I3S.B9 !� r r n � � � � "'�a Wole surloce secnoa �-� secnor� a-e --- � ° ~ °^ �o s/2 OJ �O�I1nf w y W �0 h � b ^ �� Pl�w 132 r N.; rn O Q; 1 y ' � Q u -- � � o n 1.71 _� ,�� — o � , + _ � � � � 1' 20"H .� 4,w 4� r. r�� :�..�' ."'u S�,.°Ym.;`..�'�10.�:°"- i••�r..�wa i�e..�,c+w rr...w.r....a w rw.o m,t � 1 /z o o '-— � - -�-• m � � 1" e 4' VF R. n ° .o.m.�..a�..,...ti..... a .....��. DI TCH INLET �28 � b � z° + ° N W 12B �e�� FRAME AND GRATE Cs�u,v✓��Scvioc, — -- t°— ---- -- W W�- - -- -- -- N� - ---- -- - oR,�.,NO ra.1eo ,cwun m-d e.....w...+�.. ,, -- --- --- -� _ .._— __ .____ __.____ _ DETAIL C — - ' — - -" ircN iN�7 . � �..�� a�,w� sa..;� �z4 ° DETAIL B�m -- - ---- -- !2f ---- - --_— _— -- — --- ------ +�- 0+40 0+80- ---- -- 1+20_ - --- __ ____ 1+60 2+00 _ 2+40 2+B0 J+20 0A� RE�� N0. Br Exp. 11 J!/OJ �� ---- DES�CNED BY: BA ��0.t�PQ�G SHEET ORAWH 8Y: �S �� y� KLTRAHASHI H A L L B O U L E V A R D o, E/11/03 REVISE WLLl BIVD S70RG TO SivALE -- J� � ��SSOCIATES, INC. 3 l►1 CHECKED BY: 4JD �"""`'°`<"°� . '.`�� '�°�n. STREET 8. UTILITIES IMPROVEMENTS 6 }O�O} EXTEND MANIFp�O 5� �OWARD FANNO CREEK j LM DATE' 4-25-03 �� Wd�c�W Mc6llec(urc . Ptannlry � O --'_'_ '_"___ 4� -_ _" .___ . - ' _ .__ . . _.. -- -'<`iM J `W �'S GAfOnT[n101 . SYnC�In( •-•/ 6 20�03 REA�IGN $WA�E �ACiUfY � I �y SCALE: AS SMOWN p�"+' t5590 SM )e -- -- -- � r st�«<. s��<< z� CITY OF TIGARD �' WATER QUAUTY FACIUTIES PI.AN �0.E LOCAiIOrl. � PROJEC� NO. 02.6��.118 e�••<��a Or«an B7op6 ENG�NEERING DEPARiuEN� �F 24 {so»ei�-ea�z �., (so»e��-or�� . � _� _��` ----- �-� `---JZ--------__� — — - ' --- �— — __----- — ---___. , , ' � rn w 8 ,�nnoN owurucE — — � — — � f �6 �6 " HALL BL VD. -------------------------------- �n v� I . Sp_ LA/Vzo J ------ � f— ' _ - - � _ — W � � � � � > >o'� � � i �� W ---- � 7 � � / �— r � . \ . . . . \ ��'1� .LL• .��:� . . . . . . . . .'.'. i� _ . . ..,. . . .. . . _ _. _ , .. . �t� .o .+. . . �. U � — ' � �. ' _ . , • •/ i � � ' —__ _ . . � . � . Q — -� - - - - - - - - / - - - - - P- - - - - - - - - - - _� !2'PUE��r' ~- ~� — /— — — � I \� // — - - - - - - - - — \� - - - -- - -� - - — /— - - - - � ; ` � _ _ _, ! � `� _ _ -�� . r- - - - - - I • � ��. PLANT LEGEND •. I � � ' — � TREES 4 NOTES: • - - 1 . / � �.s6 . . I �. I f + � I ocrsnNC rr�es 1. ALL Pl/V(i1NG AREAS. SFiAl1.BE IR(t1GATID llTlLiZiNC A FULLY ' { � ro r�u�w ur�asrurra�- Tw�cu "�°u"� �� nor� sYSr�. s� sr�rs �s�. is2 - : � --/ • 2. �u.� Purmrrc ��s sr� �c� roPSOn, so2 �u�rr�, " "� 1 + ou�cus r� �,m uu�c�r � s�,G,noNS _- I . 1 RW OAK - 3' C+IL, BdcB, BRANCNm AT 6' I 3. A!1 PL�INTS SFihLL BE IHSTAl1Ep iN ACCORDANCE WTTH PWfT1NG �� P�F� OETAIIS AND SPECIFlGT70NS . � v UlCEBARK EUd — 2 ��Z' CA!_, p�8. BRANCHED AT 6' 4. DO NOT PLAN7 W PUBUC UTiLlTI' EqSIdENTS (P.U.E) . � 5. INSTALL ROOT BqRRIER ALONC ALL SIUEIVAUC AND CURBS WfTHIN 20' / • o FAGUS SYLVATIG 'pURpURE,e,' OF TREE TRUNKS. SEE SPECIFlCAT1pNS iw0 8/156. � � ` / EUROPFIIN BEECH - 2 1/2� CN._. Q&B. BRANCHED AT 6' n ��GS �,�,� K� NorES: - _ � � ►�N RIDBUD — 2- CAL., BQcg, BRI1NCtSm AT 6• -- - � � �O AF'PROXIWITE PIPINC lAYOIlT FOR AfP,AT10N/OftAINAGE SYSTD�1. � SHRUBS GROUNDCOVER 5 6 � /0 �"'�'"� ��''' � 'n'"s• � � ¢� LS6 LS6 � VENf R! FACE OF ROCK riALl_ SEE 7/LS6, ' WAiFR QllAlllY FACIUiY - �p�pppq2 �F7iAf'+AR1A CFAlAEN5t5 .�. .� - SFf ClVIL DRAMII�ICS 1 OO ss' vu� a.E,vw� �E oou�sr srr�we�r - a Po�rs z`o.c. , . — . ' / I ►w+orru� �ou�o�.nr, •oou�NCr�• I OOIAPACT ORECON CR11PE - 1 GAL CONi. - 3 O.C. f'VWCXI IARCTOSTi1PFMLOS WA-URSI � I KtNMKiNNipC - � � �r, _ 3' O.C. �CORNIlS SERlCFA 'KQSEYI' � I DwARF RmiWIC DOGw00D - t GM_. CONi. - SPAC£ AS SHOvYN �_l_ �CORNUS SERICEA 'BAILEYi' � I REDTMnC DOGWOOD — 5 GAL. CONT. — SPACE IS SMOWN K 1-(1-tl I K'ATER QUALlTY FACItITY (SIpE SIOPES) � I SEE SPECIFlGTIOMS FOR.SEEp 1ApC ( `=`-'��l Iw�r� ou,um F,ticnm (eorror�) / � � - SEE SPECIFlGTIONS FOR FORB MIX • 4 �� I"�^� Fl�� PLAN REDUCED TO � / SEE SPECIFlCATiONS FOR SEEp u�x ONE-HALF ORIGINAL SCALE � _ . i / DATE RfN4trt ' . (J r+o. er G�STF °� BY� '� �"��//��f� � �� HALL BOULEVARD SLS4T ORAMN BY: �r C'��`�{�J '! (.., Gernworfcs, P.C. �«� BY: •.�..� " `-�°'"'°�`"°"' STREET � UTILITIES IMPROVEMENTS 22 D�iE: a-23-03 �� R�l� �41 �^`�O�^��v� E LOCAT�/ $CAI.[: AS SfOY?7 V'^ �� 7��btl A+�w,SAIe 100 22�6_c.owc '°°°+°�+� CI TY OF TIGARD PLANT(NG PLAN : HAL.L BOUI.EVARD - NORTH PROJECT NO. 102276.1 �"9P� nR�' �=u-M�: O F 2� fNpriCERitdC DEPMTMENT e � �� f � YY�� a� �� 8� �$� �� _ � �� k� �� R� a�� 9 � � 1 � � F � � , M4,�LL�BL,�VD.�` _\ _ i - - - - -- _ � - - - - �— o-�� -� -��—�—�\-� —._ y. � - - _ r — .�—r— _ i i � Q � - _c_ '—j�. — — — - - _ . woru'J�%f F �� I �� • ❑ �_� ��_ � / __ . ?. _..-__l- - - - - } - ' - '' N �d -.r�._ � I n �o' � - Y �^R� �� ^ � �� g j I ` $ F '� � j.�`� i �+ � ��,y- - ti{Q-� ___� \ / �� O ' � �tii[ �� y 4 \ ^ � � ' � �. 4 4 '� ��'s�` R �' �p }/ �-� �� /%i I3 � � � •c �, f�� S a�T • .� � ms�.q.w`^�II I �--._ � � � '•� _ ��1�8 � �,j $ , •' :;. � / !° • _ �,.��s, ' � '� / !• -- �;� ;�l � � -_.✓;�" � '� % ` / , .;j:. - �€. ! � / % � � � • , „ - � ' • �- � k �_ �� . , ,' � \ \ . —`� � � 1 m 1 e � m. - k ^• _ I � t� __�__._� ,� ,� -.•� �� @ i� ,'; �� . ��__�_�—'�� Vl � ' • gx � . '� � ; � / � � ; i'•� i —,., /� i `r . �' `T 3 d� � � �-� �� ;� �� e RR , � , , 'J / � 9"� �� R� i4\/. � � �. ' — � f�� . I / � � � . � J i� �,.�— �`�r�^`ty��'\�'�r � � � '�� . R � � J��. �� _ _ , �, .- ,� � � � � _. � �/ a � �� \ � � / '�� ... �N`� ^�1 ,�."'.i�M ' �z� � _ / , �_.�re— /� — � �YIN �, � / �� i � c � i �y � � aa�� I I I I ' ' I ' � � . �� ; I „ , ; h p �� oY�F�� a ° � � � � b ai � ° 3' � ��t �II�� ' a � ! I I I � I � i � � �� :� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � I � � R� �� € � a � � � � � � 3 � � � � �� a � ��R� € � � � � � � � � � � � � a � .. � � � � � 7 � k � ��N� '� � � � �, �� "� � � � �� u' � ° � 4y� � � . a �� CUST04ER � � b C/TY OF T/GARO „�,,,,,.a•a„„m, � �c�si�m °'J � DE HA.AS +�s..�....e.6.. � �� ^ �, � PROFESSIONAL o � ti EX/ST/NGS/TECOND/T/ONS I'� ssociates, Inc. uwo sur�voa b �GuWlin{Lstiuen k Svw�on � ti p A�'C'(S61)W-IUO �o O !AL YI-Wt� �RECO� l aY7�/W .an[D nKts �s�c ti L/BRARYS/TE wveN e. co,�re i �o��riv� �naca.rn..w-.aaro e�,rrrA��.tus a�n �� LCR OESiGHE7 RWM �HECKED �� 52735LS a� p [y i S I 0 H 5 ', Bv � __._ � • � m � m � - � snerr.�w,r . � i - -- - . . __ _. - i"� r- _ sw - = � � J � � _ . � � � r� I� . l � . � � - 9ov I I � / \ 1 l � � ��\ �� UJR/YIfN I I ' I _" I � � / �----- ` ' .( r�7�\ � GMJ[IlI.X I I � 1 �` �_'• � � ��w� __ r r r.e a MJ / � ..�� - �� rr rµu� I I .• � snwv t»w ..�.:�._ , / �� _, �.\ F 'j%� }. N ��r.r ret.r � -- � �' ��_�� _ ��_ ��- � � Y ►., �' � � r11'ro[�nts[r ;� � 1 I � O � ' � �V'• w; ��\ � -- -- �- , ;� �:, ,aviar.a � � �I _ / . /I� `��'�1 1�� \ ( ...�r.._• ^ z / � . � : rn�¢��ur e �� _- r�-� 1J � = � �'. .� �� m O'JHA R A 'S,T. � 'P' sw � �� =�; � ��. � 4 � .� — -- /, �� ' / � /:// . + '\ \ \ 'a'c`� il..w oyx - ��I I I I i � � � �� = � • . I I \ \��' .'S'�r� \I 11�-_ . - � F IJ3N ;�,,�i.., i u M �. ` ��/ -� � �C ��. � ,�v,�r� y � � � '.�wr� � 47�l, , �' -. � � y�� -(_� ' ��*., ��/- �: — -- � v+[-ar:a�.,a.fa�Ko �. r� '�.,, �� V�' � r �� :-�_ ��I w�r.tAO+r�,r �`� �� e; l �� .s.. �� - - 111.-�,�� sm�wv ' \ � � � uwi�aA. � Y� .eu.�-r;.- ��Yr.v _ � y-.�.qt � � �. � � -II I .'� ow�r�.ua �� _�� ,o-...o�ru_.,,<< i . . � �� • / � � �_i��. �_.11 l,f'is.. �� ,r,.a�s � � / �; � �� °� �, .:, ,��s \ �rY r.an MJ I � g ��.� 0 �I i � -� 'r�°'" t,.s� � `�i '�` �� -��,'a' � •. e �� — - � ' I ' �� «.,...��. .x.s., � ��», , ;��1� � � j a / /��. � � l S7LII M�fAI yy��[�(Ci.(K�/ � / 'l{ \ � \11IM ,�� I�II � I�\� ; ~ o I / ( � � � `i�'�[., h / 60-45�� '� /I � — o � �/ ° I �-{ � L ' 10,5 � -, E��,A 1 \ � / �; o � . • __ �'•�~ o �� u�a.�av �� - �� ..�.�nP �1 •,v,...,..c,�,. _ ��, <o> k< QMl[154/7 I � � •��,,\ \. •iG" �F� /d (J� `�� ,` �'1 Wq pr O•U �io'r�a�r!kl ,�, I I � � _ ap � •i ' ~,,�� 1's" � '� �.wH��•�5.��p �\ 1 � , �, h in�� l�n o��p ��- .�k , r \ � � , .�,- � � � heWOD OQZn � /' \{ 1 �0 r0 A�5 I�� Si'� li kaR e �-tf� \ 1 ,� � .`C n 3 S i1\1 - � )C[OCl'TL�___'`� ��l 1 % \ � ; y � O I. I ` \ -- _ 1 " - �� / — \ I�,�� V! � � � .ncw� r�_ �' T 1 � N ' 7 C I�t �� II I �o� � � _ro e- nsw ' � \ , c .f � \ �'� f -' i � `, LEOEIYD �� $ o � I '�-� � ,� �/ � y� f II � �I Kauiov � I �� —3 �!�! �� ,) h r'` JP� INR I 1 \ 7i'ns. � � � �b a s {; 5„ ]f �I � �, J � ) e_ r l�J�%+w O�B rpr �.t .9 !c'.r� I A a � � � �r \ i � , i. �'`i �, -s.. /,�� J � O.v wiG�nw �Y� �� , f �j � ,s-<a� � �;;° ,; •/ — � . � � .� � � \ V I I . �err�ur � _ �_�i� �j, � " `y' � � � , ( �C�� \ e.v .vp� �. i � ,� i SC �cv us M(K '""'E �/` wr s�tF�--/ ,/ l � � �� , � 1i �\� _ - . -0tr '"' � rr � � � �� ./ �� " � �� T � � l �� . � ) �� 1 q � \� -r �' „•ra•, ,p,�„a[ � . i 1 / � � '' ��_�-�� 1' I - m' 3 � ,�s.sqr�np,� l - - ' ° ao.c+o c.e�t�v.r.� �e , �` I . � . � ` �i2"yC(.`N /%�l l / �� CI�I I I,I J/ K�\ �N, �� J.: '__'___"'�(/1Mp y Q I 1 '�� /w _ r� �1�, , / � / � i �_ / � il I l f�� i -----'r""'nws'o' �- II 4la 1 / ..,.t. il ��-_� - �"_ ��'. . /� l_. �' " _, ).��f��/ �\ �P �� (h s�� .,,rt�• �:...... � n . R' rwacrcvr � O o � p� i �' "OA / .,,�pry � �� '�� -. '-�'� ,\ L� c�� IX7M[STm Qde! I� � ` � - . � ,,ww w . . "�'` ^f1'1•, �` � - - ��=�/., ,a-.�crF `"-j��(� - ---r—-ro.w ur � �� . .�� .� �"' -- `J /��-. � � x �•' �� y �� , ��`� -,� �,--�------_��=.� -_ __ _-->>= _ � - �,��» — � �� ,�r _ _�- -�� W �� I� ( — ,- _ _ _ .;-. _��.-__,;�. -,ab, � _ '( -- -- A-e�� '�� usr�— r� � �� _�— - _� ww n�i -\ .� �--.ra- �wiov mn�rnc occv ��"- � � ' �'-�� _� � � `\ �� -Q'R—QII/11C w!D[K V �\ ��\�` ��` � -� ,�M�'ryr Ar� �- 1 � •JO".w - _ p _ -aaiwC pWK � � �, . . ` , `, `�' 7iAtAT1T- �Sl l0 � I� �r I . / ��'CC[. �� lOCUS ♦` � �O'M�IOr I —LO'—61�K MtiW � �� `, �. • Q � '"""�"'_"�IL[Or GMQ . P � -"--"' �e'.s. � , .. �I i� �-w-� y'crow � � _ � � / s� � --�---'vn�-o S 1 ; i � i � � �°'m ia�z a OM7t/WJ i I � � � ' ��"�5..�-/�/ �Oldwr/D1tY !lY!l41a(L ' 1 ' / •r•/�" I O1wrf iD4 ��Y rxn �I� I �J ��craq. � � 1 / / �o-.s.,• .. .. ��wC 2irt aAV M�/ � �- �,rrnv • ' � 1 ' !� /��-_ . �1 KG[D�Aw/K ara�x ri �� 1, 4 �rY rxu!31 � I � I •�a-.wR r � � � � �� n[i�s�vrto ��t r.xrr At� � I �- �r� b ,. �: acaas r�a q/�ur w.o s�rccs a � an+�sn � -- r � owi[rta u .-' '� r rr u.u ncr ; r� r ae�w. i ^ � i I : noa-.vr�m svr w�o mrs y I ___--'-��-,� O7 (J � j o ,�„�,�, o x-��,a.. � �,ya�� _ i ' �- _�-- �-' 1 / � � ' � �I % .cn..os � O \ !IJI.lJ b �� - lLIOM]1f Y/ / I �Q�C�[C4qllfl/l!LSD1R@O f/9�L A/OfI1D IMSS p91'//!M � Q � � A/IJRl.1 l _ 1 �qIl/A[$t Cpil(R LIr S�NIfL L/G 1 SI.AAVMY Sl!!(pp' �""s --� :'� �..Q.�,..., ys.— / l � 6�".�,.M°,�,�.�,.,��»�,� � O y -a„u� � V � � �. _---- I �-g� '�� __ � ;,--�---- � sR.w.r��vmn�rs wr�um ow wvwciov cnc«n � � i � ��"`�o.r_ h �aa 3tv_niad _ a �� - �1 � i O �l Q ; i' ,�, , ,, c� � � g �,,, � � � � m �j , � � '� � 2 � j_ �,�.� _ �� , , — A` V y , �:, �,,. _ __ i I _ _ __ � � ,�;�� _ � � , , .� , �4, ; .� ,_ .�� O C;> > , �� ------- � •. ,�_ _i �' - , � I �' , ,- �\ �, � SJt�I 001N Y/ ,\ � M � �. . �\ ._.... . ,_- � RYIfQ)I � _-_ '" -_� k'� .\ �-_. ___._ . _ .__. ],� \ u �_- � � ro+sisn � w� q, - wowir�,uai e i ., �j a x o .a �W�/?9, 2A02 flE urzH Ms.r I 597Topo1 d.g aaa iv.m SG4LE.� 1"�t0' d rY ufN MJ iHEEi K rY��s�o IT/ 2 OF 2 . � , , �� ,,-; _. : CITY 4F TIGARD =. � . - � �� z PRE—APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES �o��a,��.�.°�f��nt = Sji;ipinj�%1 Bzt�rCommunity (Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Six (6) Months� _ - - _ _ _,_, _ - - __ ,_ NON-RESIDENTIAL �a�nnc o� l� � z G �.� �� r APPUCANT: �-•�� AGENT: �/c�ti�`�,T,� Phone: � ) Phone: ( � �� PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GENERAL LO(ATION: f/�� .� � ;��'� �-�,,,��, .� i33�� SuJ/-fQ p,/� �s i o��si a o0 TAX MAP(S�LOT #(S): NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: �S� ,�) ��,_�;.�..� L�,,� ,�P v.� k J �.�Qf PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: l ,' `S l � S,r .'/ r ee.. �f �c . � p � COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ' MAP DESIGNATION: ,' — ,r s:' � � � ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: ��- L �-- �,�— / Z � CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAM(C.I.T.)AREA: J�,,�` ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18. l MINIMUM LOT SIZE: sq. ft. Average Min. lot width: ft. Max. building height: ft. Setbacks: Front ft. Side ft. Rear ft. Corner ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: °/o Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: %. ❑ NEIGHBORH000 MEETIN6 [Refer to t1�e Neighbornood Mee6ng NandauU THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S), ANO THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meetinq is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. * NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeti�g with a Plans Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Confe�ence Notes Page 1 of 8 NON-Residential AppRcafioNPlanrung Daision Section � NAR�ATIYE [Refer ta C�de Chapier 18.3901 The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the p�oposal. The applicant should review the code for applicable criteria. IMPACT STUOY [Refer t�Code Sec6ons 18.390.040 and 18.390.0501 '•� As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication �equirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. ❑ ACCESS [Refer t�Chaptera 18.105 and 18.1651 Minimum number of accesses: Minimum access width: Minimum pavement width: All driveways and parking a�eas, ex�ept for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: , ❑ WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Secdon 18.T05.0301 WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES �R FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which,provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. �� ❑ SPECIAL SETBACKS [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7301 ➢ STREETS: feet from the centerline of`�. ➢ LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet, �long the site's boundary. ➢ FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. ❑ SPECIAL BUILDING NEIGNT PROYISIONS [Refer to Code Sectio 18.730.Ot0.B.1 BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings locat d in a non-�esidential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: ➢ A maximum building floor area to site area rati (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; ➢ All actual building setbacks will be at least ha ('/2)of the building's height; and ➢ The structure will not abut a residential zon district. ❑ BUffERING AND SCREENIN6 [Refer to Code Chapter .1451 In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO ITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent d velopments, especially between different land uses, the City �equires landscaped buffer areas a1 g certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. uffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and everg�een trees and shrubs and mu t also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fenc s may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required uffer areas may onlY be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional infor ation on �equired buffer area matenals and sizes may be found in the Development Code. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 8 NON-Residential AppGcaGoNPlanning Oivision Sec6on � The ESTIMATED REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS applicable to your p�oposal area are: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: �_ LAMBSCAPIN6 [Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.165 and 18.7051 STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six {6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the p�oposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parlcing areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. ❑ RECYCLIN6 [Refer to Cede Chapt�r 18.1551 Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAU R FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a tras recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways wit 'n a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's Service area. Lenny Hin is the contact person and can be reached at (503) 625-6177. ❑ PARI�N6 [Refer to Code Sectlon 18.765.0401 �, REQUIRED parking for this type of use: �\ Pa�king SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parfcing: , Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(sj: NO MORE THAN 50°/a OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGN ED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: ➢ Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 et, 6 inches. ➢ Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x feet, 6 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of stripe that separates the parlcing space from an ad' ining space. Note: A mauimum of three(3)feet of the v�cle overhang area in fro�t of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required p �ng space depth. This area cannot be included as la�dscaping for mee6ng the minimur��percentage requirements. HANDICAPPED PARKING: ➢ All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY� OCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum n�mbe� of disabled person paricing spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensior�s, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act {ADA). A handout is available upon reqGest. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and n appropriate sign shall be posted. ➢ BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMtLY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. ❑ LOADIN6 AREA REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18.765.0801 Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EX SS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and lo tion shall be as approved by the City Engineer. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 8 NON-Residential App6cafionlPlannirg Oivisan Sec.fion Q BIC�CLE RACKS [Refer to Code Sectiea 18.1651 BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. � SENSITIVE LANDS [Befer to Code Chapter 18.715) The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive land areas, and their boundanes, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meetinq the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. ❑ STEEP SLOPES [Refer to Code Section 18.715.O80.C1 When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. � CLFANWATER SERYICES[CWSI BUFfER STANDARDS [Refer to R a 0 96-A4/USA Regulations-Chapter 31 LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated cor�idor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Desi n Criteria: The EGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table identifies the required widths: TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAURESOLUTION 8� ORDER 96-44 SLOPE ADJACENT WIOTH OF VEGETATED � �SENSITlVE AREA DEFINITION � a s �' � ��' TO SENSITI1lE AREA CORRIDOR PER SIDE �"� � _.. � � �;� ° ;-�P,.�v. . • Streams with intermittent flow d�aining: <25% � 10 to <50 acres 15 feet � >50 to <100 acres 25 feet • Existing or c�eated wetlands <0.5 acre 25 feet ♦ Existing or created wetlands >0.5 ac�e <25% 50 feet • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres • Natural lakes and onds • Streams with intermittent flow draining: >25% ► 10 to <50 ac�es 30 feet � >50 to <100 acres 50 feet • Existing o�created wetlands >25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure . Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow in 25-foot increments from the starting • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres point to the top of ravine(break in • Natural lakes and ponds <25%slope), add 35 feet past the top of ravine6 Starting point for measurement = edge of the defined channel (bankful flow) for streams/rivers, delineated wetland boundary, delineated spring boundary,andlor average high water for lakes or ponds,whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intertnittent springs, located a minimum of 15 feet within the rive�lsUeam or wetland vegetated corridor,shall not serve as a starting point for measurement SVegetated cortidor averaging or reduction is atlowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition. 6The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet,if a stamped geotechnical repo�t confirms slope stabiiity shall be maintained with the reduced setbadc from the top of ravine. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 8 NON-Residen�al Appic�iorJPlanrring Division Sectiai ' Restrictions in the Ve etate CoRidor: NO structures, deve opment, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, o� other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality p�otection provided by the vegetated corrido�, except as provided for in the CWS Design and Construction Standards. Location of V etated Corridor: I ANY RESI ENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be oontained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. CVVS Service Provide�Letter: PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the R&O 96-44 se�sitive area requirements. If there are no sensitive areas, CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS Service Provider Letter is not required. ❑ S16NS [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7801 SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon �equest. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standa�ds may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review. � TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.CJ A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES p�ePared by a certified arborist shall be provided fo� any fot, parcel or combination of lots or pa�cels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: ➢ Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; ➢ Identification of a p�ogram to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal ove� 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must foltow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D according to the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees requi�ed by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: � Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to 5ection 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; � Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two- thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; � Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees ove� 12 inches in caliper requires that 50°/a of the trees to be removed be mitigated acco�ding to Section 18.790_060.D.; � Retainage of 75% or greater of existing t�ees over 12 inches in caliper �equires no mitigation; ➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and ➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD �F �NE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as pa�t of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. � MInGAT10N [Refer to Code Sectlon 18.790.060.E1 � REPIACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics_ ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damaged is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Applica6on Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 NON�Residen6al App4catioruPlanning Division Sei.�6ai - � ➢' If a repiacement tree of the size cut is not reasonabiy available on the local marfce# or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following fonnula: � The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1)or more replacement trees to be planted on other p�ope�ty within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. ➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to matunty. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. ❑ CLEAR YISION AREA [Refer to Code Chapter 18.1951 The Cit requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT �8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, roadlrailroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required dear vision area depends upon the abutting st�eet's functionai dassification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. ❑ ADDITIONAL lOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS [Refer ta Code Secnan 18.810.0601 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 2'/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 1%2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. COOE CHAPTERS _ 18.330(�ond�ona�use) �H.62O(fgard Tiiangle Design Standards) _ 'I$.765(OffStreet Parkingltoading Requirements) _ 18.340(�kectors�nte�etati�on) 18.630(wast��on syuare Reyiona��enter) ,�18.775(sensieve�ands Re�ew) _ 18.350(wanned oevebpmen� 18.705�ao�y�c�„�� _ 18.780�s�y�� _ 18.360(site oeve�opment Review) 18.710(Accessory Residential un�s) _ 18.785(remporary use Pertnits) _ 18.370{varianceslAdjustrnents) 18.715(Density Computations) � 18.790(Tree Removaq - 18.380�z��,y r�rr�n�,d�� 18.720{oes�yn c,an�ati�aity staodards) - 18.795(vaua�c�arance Ar�) _ 18.385�r�a��P�� 18.725(Env�a�menta�Pertonnance standards� _ 18.798(wKe�ess�ommunication Faa�rties) _ �$.390(Dedsion Makir►g Proceduresllmpad Study) 18.730��ro��e�c sr��a�� _ 18.810�sa�r a�u�my i�►�t sr�a _ 18.410�oc u�Aa�� 18.740�H�c«;�aen�y� _ 18.420��a P�� 18.742(Narie o«�pation Permi�) _ 18.430 is��a;�s� 18.745(�andscapmg&s«eening Standards) _ 18.510�R��a�,�z«,��a�� 18.750(tu�anut�ured�N�ob��ome Regu�ations) _ 18.520�c«,�,e�i za,��aa�� 18.755(�ed soud wast�te�ya�rg storaye) _ 18.530 pndustria�zon�o�str�ts} 18.760�N«,�,r«�,g s�a,a�� CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Applica6on Conference Notes Page 6 of 8 NON-Residential App(catioNPlanning Divisan Sec6on . . � A�DtTIONAI 60NCERNS OR 60MMENTS: — `��.�- � � ��u�l� � ��a� s0 �wl's-�� d,..�.Ps _ ��,E T1L �,�- .��. c.� S O �� .-o�cs� .�..�,�ne� ,�Qn,�' �• �!�'x-� I�_�S e c . PROCEDURE �. � Administrative Staff Review. ? X Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the p�oposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMIiTAI PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted b mail or dro ed off at the counter without Plannin D�vision acce tance ma be returned. The Planninq counter c oses at 4:00 PM. Ma s submitted with an a lication shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), 8 2" x 1 ' ma o�a ro osed ro'ect should be submitted or attachment to the sta re ort or a m�n�strative ecision. Application with un olded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 8 NON-Reside�fial Appicatia�lPlannirg Divisan Section . • The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request_ Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. BUILDIN6 PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge {SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the Cit 's olic is to a I those s stem develo ment credits to the first buildin ermit issued in the develo ment (UNLE S OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY T E DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINEDj. e con erence an no es canno cover a o e requiremen s an aspec s re a e o site planning that should ap ply to the develo p.ment of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Gode shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a pros�pective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City statf�relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Pla�ning Division). PREPAAED BY: � CITY OF TIG D P NNING DIVI ON - STAFF PE 0 HOLDlNG PRE-APP. MEETING PHONE: (503) 639-4171 FA%: (503) 684-7297 E-MAIL �sc�res r�c na�)a�u.tigard.nr.us TITLE 18(CITY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNlTY DEYELOPMENT CODE)INTERNETADDRESS: www.ci.tigard.01'AS H:lpattyMasterslPre-App Notes Commercial.doc Updated: 3-Oct-02 (Engineering sec6on:preapp.eng) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 8 NON-Residen9al Appfica6onlPlanaing Division Section . T PRE-APPLICATION � �� CONFERENCE REQUEST CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Ha!!Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY Applicant: _�� TI�r/ Address: 13�:ZS SW �q(� ��vt�� Phone: CaseNo.: �/�'�U3�� City: `rio�!',ci✓or � OYL R"] Zip: ��...23 Receipt No.: ��3� Application Accepted By: Contact Person: VGZr1rU one: - 1 Date: Ek+ -2-46a Property Owner/Deed Holder(s): r I DATE OF PRE-APP.: Ci1 f��.�.r.��l TIME OF PRE-APP.: v Address �[�»-,-�� , Q.�a01r� Phone: PRE-APP. HELD WITH: City: Z�p: Rev.�/tlzoo2 i:\curpinlmasterslrevisedlPre-AppRequest.doc Property Address/Location(s): ��q8� O,� f'�Gt l� �k/o� �'�1Lc,l'�v OL '�"�- �+c�C�I- '��r�.o �n^�cc.IG �Brrol� REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS (Note: applications will not be accepted without the required submittal elements) Tax Map &Tax Lot#(s): Zoning: ❑ Pre-Application Conf. Request Form 2 COPIES EACH OF THE FOLLOWING: Site Size: ❑ Brief Description of the Proposal and PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE INFORMATION any site-specific questions/issues that you would like to have staff research prior to the meeting. All of the information identified on this form are required to be submitted by the applicant and received by the Planning Division a ❑ Site Plan. The site plan must show the minimum of one (1) week prior to officially schedulinq a proposed lots and/or building layouts pre-a�plication conference date/time to allow staff ample time to drawn to scale. Also, show the location prepare for the meeting. of the subject property in relation to the nearest streets; and the locations of A pre-application conference can usually be scheduled within 1-2 driveways on the subject property and weeks of the Planning Division's receipt of the request for either across the street. Tuesdav or Thursday morninqs. Pre-application conferences are ❑ The Proposed Uses. one (11 hour long and are typically held between the hours of � Topographic Information. Include 9:00-11:00 AM. Contour Lines if Possible. PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCES MUST BE SCHEDULED IN ❑ If the Pre-Application Conference is for a PERSON AT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTER FROM MONOPOLE project, the applicant must 8:00-4:OO/MONDAY-FRIDAY. attach a copy of the letter and proof in the form of an affidavit of mailing, that IF MORE THAN 4 PEOPLE ARE EXPECTED TO ATTEND THE the col�ocation protocol was completed PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IN YOUR GROUP, PLEASE (see Section 18.798.080 of the Tigard INFORM THE CITY IN ADVANCE SO THAT ALTERNATE ROOM Community Development Code). ARRANGEMENTS CAN BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE THE � Filing Fee $200.00 GROUP. This Pre-Application Conference Request is for a Sensitive Land Review related to construction of: Hall Blvd. Street, Storm Drainage and Utility Improvements (Regina Lane to Existing Brid e Project No. CIP ST03-02 This project involves improvements to Hall Blvd. as required by the City, the City's Hearings Officer and ODOT as a condition of approval for the Library and Fanno Pointe developments. General improvements are the widening of Hall Blvd. approximately 10-12ft. on the East side with basic street, storm drain, landscaping, undergrounding existing overhead utilities, and signing, striping and illumination. A TriMet bus turnout and shelter will be included. The project was advertised for bids on June 16, 2003 with bid opening called for on June 30, 2003. Construction is projected to begin in mid July of 2003. Sensitive land issues include a small delineated wetland between two existing culverts and a storm drain water quality and outfall facility which lies partially in the 100yr flood plain. DSL Application Number 30482-GA (attached) was approved June 11, 2003 with the condition that activities in Pinebrook Creek (the area of the 24" culvert extension)be conducted between June 1 and September 30. Approval of construction drawings and a preliminary construction permit (attached) was issued by ODOT June 9, 2003. The attached cover sheet and sheets 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 20 and 22 of the construction drawings provides site plan information, proposed uses, topographic information and contours. � / � llH.'iJ, �!1-11_l� cc': ic' ��.J�G D�1 Post-it'Fax Note 76%t oaie��6 03 �9oL► � -��-�,� 4 Ta .n Qa.S From V�L(�G L� t: ..� re�an �a,�� ,S �o. �. o � !� Pno�a i 5�Q3 �i&�2�`.?.c-s5a ��.r 3� 3q- �7 r Theodorc R Kulon�oski,Govern�r IL Fe:� � �. �+g Fex M � � ^O � 52 June 1 t, 2003 JUN � 3 2�Q3 � www.oregonstatelands.us. ( r cMOVSOaas L• • �, �„� �f��RQ State Land 6oard� CITY OF TIGARQ � Theodore R. Kulongoski ATTN: VANNIE NGUYEN ' Govemor 13125 SW HALL BLVD ,TIGARD OR 97223 t � Bill Bradb�ry Scactar}�oF State RE: General Authorization for TranspoI�`}�`'►tion-Related Structures DSL Application Number 30482-C�A;I' Randall Edwards tate tyeasurcr T02S, R02E, Section 1 D Tax Lo�s 300 8 fi00, City of Tigard, Washington oun / Dear Ms. Nguyen: i � On May 19, 2003, we received your complete application to extend a culvert on Pinebrook Creek, a tributary of Fanno Creek, for the widening of Hall Boulevard. Based on our review of your application, and comments provided by interested resource agencies, we hereby authorize the project, subject to the conditions ouflined in OAR 141-089-0190 (enclosed) and to the following additional con,�iitions: 1, Fill and removal activities in Pinebrook Creek shall be conducted between June 1 and September 30, unless atherwise coordinated with ODFW and approved in writing by ODSL. This authorization permits only the work described in the application. Please notify this office when the work is complete. If additional work needs to be done in the future, a new application must be submitted. This authorization expires January 1. 2Q06. Please be aware that this authorization is not a land use appraval. You must alsa receive authorization, when required, from the local planning department and the U.S. Army Corps of �ngineers before beginning construction. If you have any questions regarding thia autho�izatio� or its conditieRS;- - - please contact Colin MacLaren at extension 244. Sincerely, � Lori Warner Manager Field Operations - Western/Eastern Regian GM:av �nclosure �' Kathryn Fi�rris, Corps of Engineers Todd F�Isbury, C)DFW � `, _ �i� _,i_��_�- �_�j I li=i.�"�� i. ' � , _ 1 Departm�nt of Transportation �� ' �� Op0"['1)istrirt 02A 5440 SW Wes[gate �rive Suite 350 Ponland OR 97221 Theodorc R. Kulongoski.,GovCrnor (503)229-5002 Fax: (503)297-6058 � ��(� �I'bisl �'hoemaker c�odot.Slate or tts June 09, 2003 �� `� U � � Vannie Nguyen .1�N L fl �fl�3 City of Tigard � ��, ;c��A�p 13125 SW Hall Blvd. �1� Tigard, OR 97223 SubJect: Approval of Constructlon Drawings and Plans and Transmittal of Preliminary Consbuctlon Permit Highway Number 141, (Beaverkon-Tualatin), at Milepoint 5.88 Application Number 2932 Your construction drawings and plans have been approved and a Preliminary Construction Permit can now be issued. A Prelimiriary Construction Permlt is attached. This includes the Const�uction Drawing and all necessary terms and conditions of the Permif. If the terms and conditions are acceptable, ptease sign the Preliminary Construciion Permrt and return it, with proof of liability insurance (see attached requirements) and (either a perfarmance bond QR a cash deposit in lieu of bond) in the amount of $2000.00, to tha following address: Justin Shoemaker, Permit Specialist ODOT District Q2A 5440 SW Westgate Drive Suite 350 Portland OR 97221 PLEASE NOTE: The s�gned Preliminary Construction Permit must reach the above address by no later than 5:00 PM on August 08, 2Q03. If the Department has not received the signed co by this date, the a roval shall be considered expired. Once OpOT receives the signed Preliminary Construction Permit, a final valid Construction Permit will be issued. The lssue date of the Construction Permit is the date QDOT signs it. No Construction Permft is valld until a copy; approved and signed by ODOT has been furnlshed to the applicant. No work on highway right of way is to be started until the appllcant obtalns a valid Construction Permi�. NOY�: TH� PRE�IMINARY CONSTRUCTlON PERMIT IS NOT PERMISSION TO BEGIN CONS7RUCTlON OF YOUR APf'ROACM(ES). i�_ c�u_ . , _ . . ,_ . _ . ,. �" • � r Tranamlttal af Pre1lminary Construcdon Permlt Hlphway Number 141,{Beaverton-TuaiaUn),at A�tllepolnt 5.88 AppJlqtlpn Number 2932. Mwxiay,June 08,2003 Pape 2 If you have any questions regarding the Pre'imiRary Construcfion Permif, please contact me at (503) 229-5002. I welcome the opportunity to assist you. SI cerely, � stin Shoemaker, Permit Specialist DOT District 02A, Maintenance Office Attachments �Pr�liminary Construction Permit and Insurance F2equirements} — --- - ---- - - - o --- - � - � --- - �' ` ' - . GENERAL NOTES: I 1I I� P�otect ol! frees on sile. I�`�I � �- � �` � k � " I i �L � I SECTION A-A � � � , . _ . , . _ --- ! j IW o ��v I / ' \ ' VARIES J1 I � i-- \ � 4 �ONS7RUCTION NOTfS -'• � z2' x pq' � �Y I rlex 8lanket p�Onted with ` � ,` , � � � ° u ! � ' � . . native herboceous seed mix, � � lO Not used. " � � ' red-osier dogwood, and ? � v ; .� ' I �±�Q � . � .�-" willow stakes to mi ' 1i39 z � O2 Const�uct wote� quality swole. - J N .- n Y n N r erosion. �� V i �o o �a I�x _ � �3 Conslruct ditch inlef. See Detail B ond C. J � �'=gw �� TOP OF BANK ` , A,"°:a:„ V �. � f6/OA��m 1t 4awc1�+R \ ` ` ��1 O ASN C-� /M MUUaI J �_ �N � �, \ .�n,�� I 0 n a � ' � � . �� ...c.a ae O4 Connecf to new storm sewer in streel. Begin wote - Q c • ��,,,�,,,,�,,,,,��.. °N~� � a.w w-�ac..v.ac quo/ity Iocilily bid rtem. T ' a � FANNO CREEK "' '� vco.�x�.�roR.0 co.ccwais o¢m..c ir ov, \ � \ d'l=i U Z / .I ' �rrr �� .+w�r I O SOCons�ruct in/et llowpod, Iup width of chonneJ. I ° J \ 1FALL STRUCTURE '? .r�.„_ �,Q ,�,Q �O _ n-r.. uv �ara O �' � — — — 1 IE=139.Ti5t \ P w•iu._ �i.o :�.o 6 Reseed swale o/fe� gradrng. See landscope plons. +u � ��r� a� ...�� aa,wo[.n u�.c n•a O y . . r� � sn.w�.c�a�oais N . 14 �1*� \ n an e os a.nn O7 lnstoll sedimento�y monhole. See Defoi! D. o � � G �r��M�M� I Rim= t145.00, IE in= 141.23, lf out= 141.15 00 inc°� Q�E 12' Monifold I j � „Q,�,,,,�� Sump= 134.73. f � ,��y �i 20' long w/10 eoch 6" / I * � � � outlet pipes � 2' pC w O8 Locate ond abandon existing we!/ with concrete ^ � 4 � / � � �`�` 'I I � m occordonce with O�egon Woter f+s- I er;aa i„ed 8 1 0' DI7CH INLET i �t I r � Resources requirements. (By Others) C� � d d'9 �°�� I IN=140.35 i �� I � '�° I I �� W IE�OU T=140.35 I ti \ T- � " •-• 9O Hydroseed ony disfurbed oreos not covered by 0+73 � IE IN=1 1.23 I � E OUT= 141.9 '�� / �"' londsco pin g pl on s. i qI E O UT 141.15 � "-' - -- -- I I ��, \ \ � r� C.....'^.�� S �6 F EROSION C�INTROL FENCING - _ •--�� \ \ �'��C � � � \ / ..........m.m� - \ l SEC110N A-A �•1 �� __ r 1 1d0 1R FLOOD PLIIN I L - I I I �K S30Ot237. � � � 2'x6'7(18" I WATER QUALITY <J �--�` / � \ -CLASS 50 RIPIRAP IAANHOLE �nnWacr�Savnn - I i j � - . � I I onwwv.c r.o. s�s ••••��••••. � � � � +c. m - Eo� - �, -� �E=iao.�s scacE �°=za' � � DETAIL D � - ` I �' ts'7 Suspect VSf i.y_ � + C _ I \ I PIOC� �.� F� I I I e _ - ._. _._ _ _ O �1 � .rr � - t - 1 -__ - -_ —. � _. ' _- --_ _ .. _ . _ __ .__.'__ _' ____. -_—_ -__'-_ ��.".-.'.: i R/W igCT10N A-A -- � � .a.w r�t r "' �� PUE Exi ting Hous - " - �� - - - - - - --- 148 �� g� -- - Existing Cround � -` 144 �� { - � ___ - ___ 6B L !? C7 —__ _ __ -____ _ __ ° _ — C 144 BJ PLAN � ✓conc. -__ o v „�,� . � 4:1 (Typ) � � � e B 2:I o "' SECTION 8-B �4p - - = O.OI ftom o1 wo/e 1 Q ; � - '�—f ---- --- '`� 140 .."� , � ...�`.. 1 "PVC 5= _0! - ,- - - 1�J � �'T•�K��^••w m o, 15. B LF 12" C76-V c c. � � � � a nr.r�w br W __.__ r v< <' S= 0.0244 __ � _ 1'36 _ " - - - - b--- --- - --_ ^ - ' " :.0 ;. � ' .....;.... � 1 p �"i --� Elev. iJ3.89- �- f36 �r r� �. ,,,� o � p �� + Wofe sur/oce SEC710N A-A SECnOrr B-e .o��..... o iu � h r� �� 4�2 03 r�A� _ � �_ -- � u 1J2 �,.; a p' �; u � PLAN --- �--- - -- �- -- -----�- � � p-".r_ o �- - --- - � ____ -- - .m.�mn o..�o-.,. ., W W �� i."m.�u.:c+:i a r.�'. �r v ruaMOe.nm w�iuw. u 1" S 20'H !Z. I .,.�..,.,.,o..�, ,.,,,�.a� �.��...�..��....R,......��.�.�..s...a,..� •� � -__ -- "�;a,.�..,.,.«, _ _ ,� m \;' 2 � 1� = 4� VFR . .u.o.m..�.a�..�,..,.r,.....,.�M>�..� DITCH INLET 12B ` '� b ; �o -- .,..'rA.. FRAME AND GRATE �„�� — ----o - - 4 w`=-- –- oaew�e rro. 3 _ - - -- - --- 128 xeo �a.�w-m o.,��..� C , _- -_ --- - - - --- -- - ------- - - - DITCH INLET Oonw�x�sc.� DETAIL C _ � � �...��.:� �@_d a_.,.....� �24 m ° I DETAIL B -- --- - - __ -- --- - - -- --- -- ---- 1 tza - - - - - -- -- - -- - - — +oo - -o+±o __ o+so_ - - - �+20 _ _ r±so_ — --- z+oo — - _ --__- - - + - - 2+B0 3+20 _ --- --- - - --- - .. oA� RE�� No. Br Exp. !?/J7/OJ �� DESIGrIED BY: BA y��P��PR��U SHEET - - — �� ; KURAHASHI HALL BOULEVARD o, - ORAWN BY: � !k ASSOCIATES, INC. -- - �/ --- CHECK D BY• �,� ____ ____.. __ _. . MJ o..��.. Cn�lueeA •t Re � . __.-__ ________ � n � ---_ o�TE: .-ZS-os ��. ,ae ,�•,�,��s«<�n°�. P�,��,�, S T R E E T E M E N T S �i.nn �•. EnNronmenlel . Sun< -•-•�-' — --- ---- — - 8. UTILITIES IMPROV � o 6/zo/o3 REAUCN SWALE PACIUiY t LM $CA�E: AS sHOwr+ �tiN�0�'S ,ssao s� �. � WATER QUALITY FACILITIES PLAN OF FIIE IOCATION: -_--_----�- --- � -- � --� - �-�- � -� PROJECT NO. 02.6t1.118 bu.mlon.Ore�n`rD700E Wte 200 CITY OF TIGARD (507)8��_e812 ��i, ��?�� p�� ENGiNEERING OEPARTMENT 'Z4 S . , C�rENERAL NOTES: � I --- - — --------- ---- i�,� ,- o — � i - Ol. P�otect o!! trees on site. ��I � o- ��' i � I � �� r — _ SECTION A—A aul � � I �RO v <'�� VARIES _ I -£- — I ` _ r- / � �� 4� �' CONSTRUCTION NOT ' � \ 2 �D'-` z2 lex Blonket plented with � � � � � ;v � \ . notive herboceous seed mix, lO Nof used. O v I . � � � red-os�er dogwood, cnd /� �2. � I +�� o � � willow Stakes to mi � � / � _ � � f�., � h a � � ero5ion. �/ � O2 Conslruct woter quolity swoJe. - N y N W o� �a / � .�R� � c o c �v� NK � \ �.. � � ..0.unuc:rnas sw. TOP OF BA �ae�ro x icauw��n O3 Conslrucf ditch inleL See Detoi! B ond C. J � °1=`3``' �� \ � `�� ssN c.„�� J °" �. �.,o,�� °^ p / � � au�c un ao � u I O x wu�r+t wr m oruo�r 4OConnec� fo new sfo�m sewer in slreet. Beg�n wofe - � "'�'� . \ p �� quoJily /ocilily bid item. T � o / FANNO CREEK �' :c�m.�.a..0 �� ov.cc*ows aam.¢�r w `� � OC 1Ii U Z / �� ar.au��vr.u� I O \� �?. SO Const�ucf in/et /lowpad, lull widfh o/ channeL I ° ALL STRUCTURE "l .o-..,. .';a' ,"';."6 p ia�n n � n-�k- �.�o �vo � X \ � IE=739.Ti5t � � �'� �i.o�c sca�:i a..a ra�.au�c° O Reseed swole oRer groding. See /ondscope plons. + " ' � � _ . . � '�, . K��n c:�„,a O~ *�� ar�uu�[�cn�oan N '` \'* � m o�.o os o rtu. 7 Insto// sedimento�y monhale. See Deloil O. o o ' �n M��MY�,y 4 Rim= t 145.00, lE in= 141.23, IE out= 141.15 O in c� }- � Q� 12' Mani(old ` ' � .,Q,�,,,,,,K„� � I � �ry`, F 20' long w/10 eoch 6" I Sump= 134.73. ^ — � 1� outlet pipes O 2' OC -�� I 4 � � O8 Locote and obondon exisling we!/ wifh conc�ete � �� ' °��`� in occo�donce with Oregon Woter �+s- I B��+�� 8 � 0� OITCH INLEi � Resources �epui�ements. (By Others) v � �°�9 weO I IN=140.35 '� � �� I I � IE�OU7=140.35 I `� �—+� " 9O Hydroseed ony disfurbed oreos not covered by 4+73 � iE iN=t 1.23 � W; � E W i= 141.9 .,� ' ""' landscoping plons. , I q IE OUT t4t.15 , ` .._.. i.�_� ,z. s � � &F EROSION C�N7ROL FENCING I � ?� S ��C \ � \ ..........o.mR - .��. � c \ ....�...� \ \ fI SEC110N A-A �� foc �� P 1 1�0 YR FLOOD PLAIN q�a�r� l31 7 LF � I I I �-� 5-0.0123! WAiER OUALITY /i �� 2'X6'X18` <� �—� ' � � � . CLASS 50 RIP RAP � � �y � �� MANHOLE QnnV�`tr�Savim �Y I on•wv.c No. s�s 1 �/ � � _ � t. o�- _ I �I � � I `,i_ _ - � � " �E=iao.�e � scacE �°=zo' i � DETAIL D � + � r � �� ,=o«<�s. _ � � � � _�� _ � �� ,, ' , � � a . . . , � ., .__ -- --- - — --- -- — ° -. -- — - — -- - - � "' - -- 1 . ...,... --- R� � YCTqN A-A �v rur r�.R -� �� 12 £xi ting Hous " ^ PUE _- _ 1 �I - --- -- -- - - � �� g� � _` fxisling round � _ o 144 � � a c 14� °J P�!w 6B L 72" C7 V conc. — -- __ o -- ,q - -- �.,,■ . 4.T (Typ) - ,� • ` e B - �2:1 0 , SEC71oN 8-B _ �40 -- -- = O.OI ttom oI wo/e , q � - •�—� � 140 " � r , � w ---- - ..� ! 'P l�C S= .Ol - - --- - � +'^'r'K'��^•�M m o, 15. B LF 1?" C76-V • ' ,r �. ■..�w..� ---- V . c c. � .�� =C - S= O.0?44 r ' 1 W J � l0 n ' � • f ' '��. �. •,: � _'__-_ __ ^ -_ -- __ __ � -- _._.._'-_ . _ __ _ . _ ' • r n�. M p u��.-- _e . £lev. 133.89_ � �36 —�r K �.- -�� ..0 � � °' �� + Wafe surlace SEC710N A-A SECnoN 6-B ____ o 0 0� "� 4 2 03 + „ u � ..ma w...�,. r�A� 1J2 � � ° "�� oi j r� � u � � N^ o� O PLAN - - -- -� ------ .�-'r--- ---- . -- --- -- rn 5 0 - --- - --- - -� 'J c.o.swi m.vr aamn s ur.c-.n � �w � � .� + �uW � .� .�.. _� ra r-rm►.nm�..�ova. n 1 = 20'N /Z. u,�°,."'�::.o,.j6,.�..w..,..�.a.q.� �.i.�.�...0 i....c,....r.-.n.,....�.r..o�m.eYa y. .n.a�x n+.w.�.......oca>sm - �' a� � 2 a 1" = 4 YER . ^ �s��. DITCH INLET 1Y8 � �b Q ; �° - �� FRAME AND GRATE pr�„��,;� - ---- 3 — !2B - - -- - - -- - ---- --- -- -- -- ----- oannwc ra.teo rw4n o:-w �-�•�•�••r. C � --- - --- - -- --- DITCH IN�ET (]r�n1V� Savicr O au..m wo.fso ��+-d °� DETAIL C r24 m Q I DETAIL B '� -- -- --- -- - - _ _ --- —— ---- --— — — — -- - — - --- - — - 1 _ r2s — -- __ _ __ +00 _0±40_ __ 0+80 _ __1+20 _ ____ 1+60 _ 2+00 ____ 2+40 2+80 3+20 --- -- ---- --- - ---D�TE RENSION - -- ND. Bv ExP. 12/31/OJ �� ----- ----... SHEET `�PR�`� KURAHASHI HALL BOULEVARD OESIGNEO BY: BA �``0. `"�S �� D 1 DRAWN B7: � '�f — ___- C -- CHECKEO BY: MJD � ' � — _ __-_—___ __ o.�aa. ____ -_.. _____ - _ C7�11 Cn�lnee[1n�A*�teS Re�urca ---__ oATE ._25-03 ��. ,oe � S T R E E T S _ _. ___. . ___— __—.. ._._._ �a ��S nHronme enn L°n McA�edure . P In� 8. UTILITIES IMPROVEMENT 6/20/03 REALICN SWALE FAC1lITY 1 �A1 SCALE: AS SNOWN ��N pd"i' F �41 • S�er� l ' � O OF ��E �oC�noN: ---- --- - - - - - I _ _ __ � �sseo sw tey si��et, suue zoo CITY OF TIGARD WATER QUALITY FACIUTIES PLAN � PROJECT NO. 02.641.118 Pee.erlon,Ore�on o7006 ENGINEERING DEPARiIAENi ' �wa)e��-ta�z r., (soa)e��-e�ai 24 . � � �,(( — B�� — N CITY OF TIGARD A a�� µ0.y 9qW 0 R E G 0 N � N�TM°�°i� �y�S eo� Y �, PLANS FOR PROPOSED PROJECT - � MAY, 2003 eu�ROws �'�tio srnccT �� 4 > � > o - o v� SiREEt uCU0N�L0 � BVLI Yp�N7A1N RD Bp11TA RO � H A L L B O U L E V A R D BEE�BEHD R0 q �,RH�w = Street, Storm Drainag� 8, Utility improvements ,�w��' ��" INDEX OF SHEETS , �X�� TYP/CAL SECT/ONS (Regina Lane tc� Existing Bridge) 2 (G 1) GRAD/NG � EROS/ON CONTROL PLAN V I C I N I TY M A P PRO✓FCT s/T .3 (L 1� PL4N cL PROFILE (HALL BL l�D): STA. 1 f 16.73 TO STA. 5�-BO 4 (L2) PL4N & PROf7LE (HALL BL I�DJ: STA. 5f80 TO STA. 10f 60 5 (L3� PL4N � PROF/LE (HALL BLVDf: STA. 1Of60 TO STA. 11t40.14 6 (C1) CONSTRUCAON DETA/LS 7 (C2) CONSTRUCT/ON DETA/LS 8 (C3� CONSTRUCT/ON DET.4/LS 9 (C4� CONSTRUCT/ON DETA/LS 10 (O1) W.4TER OUs1L/IY FAC/L/TIES PLAN 11 (Ul) UT/L/TY PLAN (PGE) 12 �u3j UT/L/TY �,a� (c j FQ NN� C C 13 14 (U4) /LL UM/N.4T/ON P[�1N ��<K 75 (U5J /LLUM/NATION PLAN 16 (U6) FUTURE S/GN,4L CONDU/T PL4N 17 (S1J S/GN/NG AND STRIPING PLAN 1 B (S2) S/GN/NG LEGEND � 19 (LS1� /RR/CV4T/ON PLAN (HALL BL�D) STA 1-1-16.7.I TO STA 6t50 � J 20 (LS2� /RR/GAT/ON PLAN (KALL BL IiD) STA 6t50 TO STA 11 t40.14 � ' C� 21 (LS3� PLANT/NG PLAN (HALL BL l�D) STA 1 f 16.7,j TO STA 6t50 0 M A R A S T 22 (LS4) PL4NT/NC PLAN (HALL BL�D) STA 6t50 TO STA 11 f 40.14 --� 2.j (LSS� /RR/GAT/ON DETA/LS J Q 24 (LS6) PL4NT/NG DETA/LS = 0'MARA ST N I _ j R E G I N A BENCHMARK E D G E W 0 0 D J I I ✓��co/confio/ ros es�ob/shed usinq o �ound Aross Osk o( !he Nor(hwesJ corner o/SW Ho//Bou/erord f SW Burnhom Slree/. me dsk !s s(omped C/IY OF!/G�IRD SURVf�Y I CGWTROG Po/NT" 7he devofion on (he d'sk is 15675 ond is lrom Ihe Tiqo�d ✓ertica/Ne/work. AITENTION: p-egon lor repuires you fo ldlo.ru�es odopfed Dy � fhe A-egon Utility Notificotion Cmfe/. ThoSe�ules ore set ldfh PR0.fC/Pf9CN 01iR9l71I APPRpVA[BY� n OAR 951-00I-0010 tnrouqh OAR 952-00�-0090 You moy Exp. 72�31�OJ ��p�PRQF'�� obfo�� copies o7 fhe rules Dy colling the ceNer. y1`�� „ "iS' VANNIE T. NGUYEN, P.E. CI TY OF TIGARD Nofe: Ihe fNep hone numbei Iw the C(e on Utilif Nofi/icolion P��PR�� Suile 300 - AGC Ce�ler \ rG d� � � - .f ♦ 1710QS 4 [naNC[rtwt uu�uzA Cenfer is (503J ?32-1987). S.'E�t�y-�O 9150 S.W. Commua CirUe � CALL BEFORE YOU DIG �,�� 36 � 95 DE HAAS � ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT y. � x5lsonvllie. Oreqon 97070 � o.rz 13125 S.w. HALL BLVD. 1-800-332-2344 0„«„ �� ssociates, Inc. `�oaccoqe 2 TIGARD. ORGON 97223 ps Consullin En meers k Surve ors ,M {� VOICE' S03-639-4171 r,�� qu 6 6 y T NpJ ceo.cc�wo 4 �,S PHOr+E (503) 682-2a5o FAX: 503-684-7297 �'Y/N J — FA7( 681-�0�8 � �x�avo.� �_ �� _ WWW.CI.TIGARD.OaUS eaotee�.�e , ' . . I I I I I I I � Pl�' RF!�V�=.�=�; �O I I I � O►vE-t-t,��F G:�ic;t�vAL JI.r�LC � � � � I � �� 3 I � I �y ! PLAN � � ' I� � � Sco/e J"=30" — — . . . L I _ _ _ C w C sfo(iMinq _ _ _ I ,� O 1 (NJ IrJ9e1 Hos end N � (w) iD.aaA7 wdi Si fwj s � W �' � ------- �-��W---'��—'- ��--�,m—� c��-� —_� �ti�-. ._._____.-__ �_�� =s� ._-�.,+�_- - - — — _ — � — — --- -- - . � �+ ` ' W ,.g V � ` ` . _ � _ __ �---_ _ , I `- j io LEGEND i ?•� � �•� H,4LL BL l�D. ..on s.QO � �•� H.4LL BL ^ a oa + ----H----f---T�-----�-----�---�-- �v- - - o±----�-----�------�-- --I----�----�----�-_-i � �—� Sediment /ence / — � _ _ ^ - - - c°":n"`u"�'n°"' . !nlet protect�on .e� _ — isI -= � —.. _. ._ - _ __ - — — .. _ . .- . i — _ � _ — -- _ -- �� _ `� - - � � J � � ---- '" c - "- -- � Exis1. inlet _ _ --� _--- - s --� _ _ U _ _�_ __— _. . - — �- ` z I � �� , � � Q Exrst. monhole Z - . � n y- , _ _ — — £xist. storm d�ain � i: 3 _ � � � � � - - - -� I 0 � � Proposed inlet _ _ _ — — �� — - - - ��'�1 - _ _ _ - — � � � — —Sp — Proposed storm drain Go0'veyVinifa I J , , d .� � — — — — — — � - _ _ - - �� ; �� , ; � � ��,�,�, . ��— -- o I \ + � ,\ � , � I i � ! Consf�uct sediment 7ence ; � y : ; � — C \ � �1 � FAMbID i � 'V � : i L - - _ _ = /� _ - , 2O Consfruct inlet protection i � � ��'� � �7F I ' � 3 g �� -- i�6 ----- - �-� --- • ;� � . � 1 � . ; � I - - - _ � � i , �� I� „� �� - i �� _ , - --- @ � � I � � ` V I � I �I � i,', ' ' ' � — �� _�. __ - - - - - - - � � - \ 1� � �^ i q j ` �" � � L� � � �� ., `� �.I ' � �°_�',,' �.1�� — � � - ��f]0�0 �'� � i Nor� � / - 1�` � ,� !`�`. , _ , / - ± � , � _ --� Erosion contrd measures shaJl � �f � � 5�� i� �� ,` - i � i � / �� I � O �� J j� � comply with: � � �; 7 ��i��t�� .� - � � � � -� r- - � ;-� - _ �- `�' � i - , ' _ Erosion Prevenfion and Sediment � � �l �� - I � � i � �- —_ � �-- �--� i� � ';. �ri � �� Control Plonning ond Design ' Monual, Revised December 2000. Developed in partnership wifh: Cleon Woter Services (CN5), (/orm/ey USA) of Woshington Coun ty, O�egon HALL BL VD. �, Woter Environment Services (N£S) �A � o/ Clockamas County, Oregon I City ot West Linn, Oregon AND ��'� 7ope� .� 7oPe� � I Field Manuol 0 5 ° Erosion & Sediment Contro% � � � � � November ZO00. � + ,p R/W N� � r'repared by. � � Q r�-0 I OGOT a -0 � A ; �z' PU£ Qti > ; ,c �ic O HARZA�NGINEER/NC � -- - ~ � - - --� � - - - - - - -- - — - �m I Q�--=_-�- --s � I -- - B(JS TUi9N UT DETA/L - -- - - -- ---------� -�--- - - -- u T------—.,� --�- � ° --` �_- � a..�_ FROM STA 4t97 TO SJA 7f22 �� \ � , 11"A7 FULC W/07H S/D£W4LK �,4R/ES + 9+cn p��1T� �— � -�-—+—- ��_�,_!arW � 71fA7 \ � OL�ILJ W/OTH AS SHOWN M/N 0 5' � '�—-—-+�--- __+__ 1z*� ON PL4N5 I = � _ 2 q �--�-�--�— i- SEE Sw HALL B/�O. AC OVERLAP ' 2� � � --� - � _ , � /NTER,t�/ SECT/ON 2' io a , - ~I � ?X _�.�,�� - _. � ' i I � �_ -\ . . . ' � �i ( � /yy�� - - — _ — _ — �'_ — — � � ��- �� - �1 �� -.S.��d'�'-�' {� � "�.�"�. _ _ . �. — _ _ — — , � � �- -i " i'� !�(rt .� �!� • STANDARD CURB (lYP C J � - - " �1 i �=g ^��' 1 f0"PCC, 4000 PSl 7"EXPOSURE _-_ - Liodn9�"^;' � , � / � ODOT (ERO 700J � - _ i � .I° OF 7 1/2"-O"BASE ROCK ��Y -� � -• - •1(i 1 � NorE� SECT/ON A - A - � , ,�'�`�,� ��'� � �� 6 -- �� i � rURNDUT TO BE CONSTRUCTED Of 4000 P.S/., 2" TO 4"SL UMP CONCR£T£. , � � � EXPs1NS/ON JO/NTS SHALL BE PLACED NOT MORE THqN 45"APART. �' � � I ` CONCR£T£ PAD TO BE 10" TH/CK ON J" OF 1 1/2"-O"BASE ROCK COMPACT£D / I I � ' i. TO 959. OF AASHTO T780 (MODJ. � � / �� ' .I"DE£P CONSTRUCT/ON ✓O/NTS S//ALL BE PLACED NOT MORE T/lAN 12'APAR7. -- �� i DATE } REHS�ON �N0. Bv Exp. 12/31/03 SHEET -- _. � _ ._. --�----... _ _� DESicrrE� Br: H. IBR�HiM ,�,pf0_�ROlG.f Su'te }OO - ACC CMIN - _ --_ _ _______ _ __. �5 �,�� oy DEHAAS 9.�5W. ��,�«�,«k H L BOULEVARD �, ORAYM BY: BPD `�� 96 v as �ISOnvilie, Orcgpn 97010 .— _' ._.._—___ —__. __ . ' � . CNECKED BY: MJD "' i p- �%�,� zs ,,, ss o`Ea,t n��Surveyon CITY oF STREET 8. UTILITIES IMPROVEMENTS -- - - - — -- �'--� Inc. DATE: t-25-03 2 - -- - --�-� � -- -- - - - ---- ---_ .. ..__. _ _-. _ ��„•a° PHONE: (503) 682-2�50 �F i scn�e: ns srrowr, N�,� �nx �s2-�o�e TIGARD GRADING d EROSION CONTROL 24 FILE LOCATION: HAIBASE.DWG ��I PROJECT N0. 02.644.118 ENGWEERING DEPARTMENT ' � � pt.11N R�DUCED TO � � � ' S�o �0+63.75, 2I50' R�. m w;den�ng o�eo, updote I CURB RETURN CURVE DATA PLAN 12" M✓ x 6"' FL Tee I volve boxes �o current f1�a�,�� +N�yC�� I �12�'�� P��9 detor'I ond adjust to grode. � v�c NO. RAD/US � LENGTH BCR �/4 �/2 J�/4 ECR 6"FL x MJ GV Exisf. occess to 13700 Scale. 1"=20' 6`M✓ Hydion l J I de 1371 D SW HoII 8/vd. AO 35'00 9��53 24� 56.1 J� 57A. N� ,T+77 70 TC TC IC STA. W !Ot 62.1 I Q 25.00" RT. 156.84 156.3B 155.78 25.00"RT. Res�roin o//joinfs ' to be relocoted TC 757.00 TC 155.78 ^' See Fire Hydront TL 5600 C �' southerly. 35.00 8'0526` 53.81� STA. IY f0t579 TC TC TC S7A. H 4t97.77, `v � /nsto/%lion dwg. 542 U' , 24" Conc culverl BO �� (J � l£ 152.09 15.00'LT 155.8 156.44 156.B7 25.00"RT � � 7C 155.J3 TC 757.01 � � r� 90o R� e EX;Sr �B 4�' Grote 156.16 _ _ �'c x (�' stotioning � .;_ , - _ �Detoi/ E� ' .: - ' . sro 2t3630 , ,", _ _ TL 1200 TL ��00 '. �Hf 4+J9.83 Ho// B/vd �H� = W � � � lOt 0 0 Wo// Sl Curb & sidewo/k Exisl C8 - � ong/e breok Grote 15618 ' r� rt �200 �"'� ° ° �W' W � �` �; -- - -- . _- u� - _ ,� . . _=- -_£1 f�- - - r..---r = L�l ta _ �„ ��f.v , T � �� :a-- - - � _ �- "- -_� Sfo 2+17 � 24' wide=- _ - �, °- ' = f=�-f=. __ __°- � ��-� `- -- E,;�, _ »c,. " _- - � l �, _� �c �� _ : - �� _ __ '"� - �, ,� . ' ---- --= ==�_ --�� rn � in v� diivewoy ODOT£RD 725 I�Exist CB _ _ � _ �fi I "' --- � � " option A -_�rote 156.23 .� -- E_'^� c, H � � - - n �- - w . �� o c ' w - � -- - - - -- -- - I_ - - -- - --- - � __ - -- --- _ -- i - ` - -- - �Of00 1+00 0 - � � Remove r N HA L BL liD. See Detoil A O 5+00 � � ,� N �,. ,o ��. E ?t00 t J+00 4t00 � - - F - - - - -+- �- = I _ I Culverf � _ _{---_ - - - - -� This e � � '. »2 E - �� - +'- - � c. .: ' f �s( ie t � .,,�.. C1 � O i _ .:, . , - • - --- " � `� . � Remove iow '/� - __ „ y< < � - - - . � � � . . ' _ _:_ - - - .� , Ex _ - - _ _ _ -- - _--� --- �_ - - -- - ;s� �2 D l- O trees i . � - �-�� . / - - - ol _ V' I WM � � -- in �'` �_ : � l � w,N _ i _ Ex s f ss,uH - - - - - _�! � � - ---- O R in 15I.56 � � � F I I E - -- -- �` � � _ �----- - - � � --- - _ - . . .- - ---- � _ E.,s;Is,dewc. .' � _ •,: . ... ., _ - .- ---- -- - . -- � . New rim 156.48 _ ( 1 ��- . . ,. �� : Plonter ;� ° �-a -�� V` � � Remove exist L nch C8-- � �„ '�_ _ .J _- Exis i �" ;D . C3 � ��a i 8� Conc Sid Wo�k Y f ' PVC P/PE � h A I - _ _ Sto 1+05.95. 22.55' R7 Y� J I �z o � � ir-End this � � Q � � - _ ,��E ! ,uH controct 1 - , Construct 0007 inlet q;j� � �5 d R�y 8" Conc sidewo/k j ;�+ Conc. AOrliRom,� ,��rr��e 4nE i �� ' � Grote = 159.03 �� l{ � ,�� a� £R0755 O tion � Sto 4+21.32, 14.2J' R1. I � _ � � < i I Cul in 12"FL x AI✓ Tee T� t�OO SjQ 1±�5.85 25_RT_ _ _ 1 _ _ - - �-PUE w � � ' 12"So/id s/eeve (12"/ong £nd std curb dc ew rim 156.92 - - - - - - i � � �2 E ! Sto 2�77.31, Constr'uct i 12'FL x MJ BF �o/ve Sto 1+16.73, 24" R� sidewolk tronsiGon I See De�oi/ B � - - - I ' ODOT inlet CG-2 I o r - I- �-,� Thrusl B/ock Remove exist bo��icode - Sta 2�66, Construct � Thls Sheef I £xist. occess to 2- conduits � � I E I i Begin std curb dc for Verizon ODOT i let CG-2 � sidewolk tronsition. rl � \� Remove 62 LF 18"pipe � ' I � 1 � 13560 SW Hall I I I T L 3 0 0 I Blvd. to be I Begln peoject. 1,j700 SW Ho// B/vd.� � �� terminoted ' i Reploce with 50 LF 24'" I 3 I �V '' � I 3 See deto�� sheet 5. a I � i � j I Q [�;sr �etoi/ A I 7lgord, Or. 972Z3 I � � J i � '� T[ 200 ^��E \ � � E.;sr naus � �' �`+ � �I _. ,,'�_,'8•51e1��,,,�,� FANNO � � � i o• ' � a �13560 SW Ho/l B/vd. � All overheod utiJities �o � i � iE��8.se PQ�N� � � j Q p � � � ITigord, pr. 9722J �J be ploced unde�ground ` - i � I� I � � i y�- o � , � � � � � �, � =, �C/7�'�7F 77GAf�D L/BRAHY I . ,-- - - - . _ ,-- - -- --� - - - - -- .. . _ , -- 1--� 1 -- - - --- - _ =-_ -- ---- �- - � � _ �' �-i- � ^ �1 _��.__ ,,`�' N �-_ � _ •� I o�,n � II ^ N Non geomefric I I I i , II I Nn � ,r + u verficol curva I I � . i 160' a� „ N�-�. N N � j60 CROSSING �� --- � - - !o� ��_+o � + co . . '- t---1---- __ �-- -- � _ I Non eometnc '�S ��,\� �'•� h � i i �+- I . , , � � , ver�c1O curve I � !E 12° StD = 152.50 I ?O� N i �p �p "�iiy i N iE 1z° ss = �a7.7s - � ! � � � ^ �a I e o ^ .. I , � , ' J Exlat ode at f � II h + ; +Ih +I�p '. I N h �' �I � li CROSSING �z �58 I z4'Rt � \ N.- �'w Exlat. oda at � � �58 ' _ �- - - - --- - 9r � Top o/cu� + - - � 1-- _ t- -I *- -t curb re ie !P - - - I r� h W -- - lE 12" SS = 147.41 I Sa _ � --_ lE 24" St0 = 150.02 I ��9g '---=-- � � � ; i • ---�-----�----- i----- CROSSING c3 rss s= -o.ore2 S= -bo�2s � ---__ - 1�_-----_ ' I_ _--- -_ -- ---- ---- ----- � � _ i -- lE 12° SS = 146.61 � ---A �rox. exist 6" WL I .- - . - -- --S'-Q` -- - filr�grad�o�9v!! ' !---- - --- ' I15 - T h x� g �ield �{erify) , � 6 + � /1 Ad sf Monh 'e. Pull c e, Ez�l EOP T - ProfYe ade +� _'- '/� � U M inl. 0.5� in � 13' Rt of� I AdN t Monhole Pul! con , uJ I od risers o od'stin � odd ise�s and odjusfing � � - c oronce N I � moin b C.O.T. - �S 77 C76-p _ - - i i----- I -- � rings Min. 26" fo /irsf s ep. t�54 O ��n s. Min. 2 " to lirst sfep. Oj Abondon exlsl. I 154 I I service. P/ug ot � -- -- �? LF - -- - - r--- -�- �- -- -- -- � Y �' � on� S_ i I ', P.H! Ir- ,I I 0712 I � I 11.31 LF 12" C7�6-V Conq I � I '^ ! - 1 4.Q - �� y . S= 0725 I 12" D.l. ! v/ 152 �! � - � � ; Wo�e�line 1 �152 I Grot = 159. -� f - - -- - � - - -- � r- ----- -- - - - - -- - � - ----- - I � � PROF/LE � ! _ r Sca/e: o�iz. 1"= O' � I o 0 ` Grate - 55.97 er1. 1"_ " I I� 150 -- -- - -- - -- o� �-- lE- �-2(� i -- -- -- 150 o„ p, lE OUT ) 152.00 - � ote = 15 .00 - - -- -- -- - � �r+ �N � � � f lN (S)= J5J.18 Existing 1 � r h N N N •y l (fxist) ( )= 150.3 sanitory ewer � � _ 1� k x � W �� = 150.18 148 � -- - -q'`o ,r-- w �---� �-^ ^- - ^ .� r� q� � � � � - � � � � o � � o N - o o � r � w ro rn �o w � n � � O�f n � v�N � �O Oi O h b �+ 7 p� �- tp O� .� n � ... R1 /'1 W y a� 'F Oi O h O �O O h O vI tb h t0 �'1 O� O Yy O b h b h h � h h h b h �f1 Vf 1(� h 1(] V1 {n h In h V�j h V�Oj h �b h y(Oj h h 1p �O f0 � Y1 h h u� h h �I h Yb] u1 h v1 Ilhj h h v1 h � 146 ., ., � .,'. ., .� .. � .� -- ., -, ., .- `�� ., � .� - ., ., ._ � ., ._ ., � � � ,� _ � � � � -- �- ._ .. .� - - -- __ - - - _- - l _ ,� ., „ -- - _ _ _ -- - - - 0+80 - -__ 1+20 _--, - 1+60 _� 2+00 - 2+40 - 2-180_ - --- 3+20 -- - -3+60 --- - - 4+00 - 4+40_ 4+80- - 5+20 __ 5�.0 �A� REH�� N0. BY Exp. )2�37�OJ SHEET _ _ __ ._ _ .__ __ . _ _ . __-_ _ . .- _ . DESIGNED BY: N. IBRAHIM 1E,0.��PR�l�,� Suile 300 - ACC Cenler H A L L B O U L E V A R D L I - --- ----- - - --- -- �--� �S. ��r+[p �o�, � DE HAAS 9450 S.W. Commerce Circk DRANTI BY BFD e' � �� 96 9s Wisornflle. Oreqon 97070 CHECKED BY MJD & ' /��TL� -- - - _ ____ ___ _ _ ��, ��'s�, ssociates, Inc. * �� STREET 8. UTILITIES IMPROVEMENTS -- - -- - -- - - - - -. . OATE: 1-25-03 � e � ,,, Conaullin` En6ineen k Surveyon �� 3 I scn�e: ns sHOVrt+ 4�""�_��`' PHONE: (503� 682-2450 CITY OF TIGARD PLAN d. PROFILE �F 24 �MJ.�7�` FN(: 682-I018 ENGINEERwG DEPARTMENT FI�E LOCATION: HALBASE.DWC 'I PROJECT NO. 02.61{.118 . . zo� 2�;• __ �� ^ !n widening orea, updale .I I I volve boxes to current PLAN R��UCED TO PLAN TL ,�OO rE'. ." " � i � . detoil ond odjust to grode. �[-_�� ('j�(�A�SCALE Scole: 1""=?O' � �, �� - � � � T �J I Al! overhead ut;lities to MM J •��a 5,B"-c . �* �� Sro MH be ploced underground � ..�rn 1 ija"� . _ Q �� S 1, ,g7.J6 T/ -7 coC m mon_^- �� I � � �� 1G5 ~ . - /L /O� £xisf occess to 13560 To.keo DEa � R �a� � �gM = 1si, \ '� .�` � t ��I . � c. . . � � I� W SW Holl 8lvd to be ' - _ I � � � W used os femporory _ ...s, _-E - � O ,. ,�c;P . I access during library ' R I - , I / � consbuction =, �, , _ -�— f - - _ _ - - � ..i - - - � ' � �\ ..I _ . - _ _ I � � - _- - � . --_-- . _-- - � -. . _. _.-__--_ __- __ .. _. _ - I � . ' �-' __' _ ' S- __'. . �-:6 _ _ __- . _. _ ', I __ _ �- L . �/ 4 , ._—� r.�. c. �` ` - ` 0 , � , � - { _° -- . - - -- - Sto 9+9 23 55 RT � . = s�- =_' — � -_- _ _--_ It .. ___- �1 _ .. ��-1'�'—? I 1 5. SI '^ ' -___- __.-_ __ ._ .li � � _ _ VJ � . '__ . ' .._ - , .�. :_ . . �_. __--_.' ___ , . ._'_.__ � _ ' . J ' __ .__ __. . .__ _ v� + _ _ _ 1f�� H.4LL BL : e 0O 9fi00 � --COnsfru[t ODOT inlet CG`2 - `� - -- � 6+00 a .r a I- -� - � - � - V/ � r r. - Sto B+00 Curb -�— _ �'— - "' - -�-- . :,. - --{ - 1Ot00 _ _r E�c � - _ . _ . . - ' --- � � - - -�-- - ongle breok , .- . . . E..,; •o- n�- , ,: '� - -�--�- - � 2` � ` - - -- - ,-- ' -- _ . • - _ --- -—— — , - --- ' . __.-.-_ ._ _. . ._O _ _ �IF_�. __- _. .-r . __ _ - __ _ ' _ _ - �_---�� _ ___.. __ r ' . . ��`�_ - .� �T � U•_ _ £x�sl 11"0.l �� ' �- - . - - .- - . + -- �� _ _ _ _ _ ... _ N �I �n Remove row ol trees m' �_ _ wv __ ... _-- - - £x�st �2�i1 _ _ �-- --. Ex;s� 11 of�r .� rc ,-,-. ' 0 Fp ��-'--_ ♦ ` Q _Bus turnout see shee� 2 (L1) t � Plonter '^'�� '�"��'� - ' � v .�� . 5c c�s< Remove i ��' � 8" Conc sidewolk �'1 � -- I Conc. ADA Ramp o ti Remove en ,., F�, e;�, , = tree (Typ) � �+� ERD755 Op�ion C `O� " �° �''��^ i - � � �� N,� B�Conc sidewo/k �- � _ _ � — -+ - _ - _ - - ' � .� � I �� 233-�I ou _v�- \�.,�.�.�; Const_ru �_ct 6 x,�4'x 6�__ - �See SQea'/ico ions �2� PU£ —' = _ �_ --�- bus she/ter pod. S/ope ?x - -� - - Sto 7+45. - - - -.-� - - - - - - - - - - -��- I� 7F"PUE oo a T on uit or ectrica d to 2-2' condu�fs /or taword sidewo/k (Bus I shel er nd i rig otion ►roller Constr ct ODOT r let CG-2 TL 600 �'� - �' - � h she/ter by others� I I � �II e ovi d by ih s to � � ��-_ _- !��ty libre �cs___ 13350 SW Ho/l B/vd. �� Sto f0+3$, � 24" wide +�- ' ' I�gTs� I the /W line � - -- -- p o�d p�_ 972P� �drivewoy bDOT ERD 725 a Remo�e ��]'y Librory srgn � � �� 9 �, option A _, i /�rFCe � T� �� --- (By others) `F'�� .4/9� � L/B/9jC1i9Y - (Exist access Eo )3J60 � �i - ''-J�- � ,� - ,i� �SW Holl Blvd.) i , - - -- -- � __ �r � � � - r - - - I - ---- -- -- -- - --- i ---� - - - i r � _ I � I J -�-- �___ � i � 154 I '_- + � - - i -- �=�� - _ - -- nl ! 154 i ___ _ - - Non ge�met�ic � � WI ,g,� � '-` � ,o � verticol�curve II � W � 152 i I (' Ol g , _ — - - a__ � I __ ^ + II I Ex�at ada at - --- � J --- - - � I 152 � Proflle rode nt ut er 25' Rt �� _ � - . - - TC�= 6flle grode Y-. _ � . yr � .I }. _.- I - — -�----- � rn I - � Top ol curb ' , 4 V J I �''_- (curb r lie/ 7" Ty�I) h I ^ � W � ; S= 0.0 57 - --_ 'i T 150 i �� -' - _ + v + � N� .�L/� 0 - � - -- - - ^ _ -- _ .. o, .` � I50 I VJ M t - ■s. -�-� - - - - I W I � I 13' Rto � __ o� h � + � I � - -_ � h0 �}n i � . � ` � I . � O`F O b O � 149 � '-� F - - - --- � 1 "^ ^� 148 � 2 � � Grot = 152.1 -- I -�__ _-- -- ---- - - -- � h lE r (N)= 48.50 i 25p F �?„ r - I � �O p?� �_ � U � c� _�' ! `'�'� � _ � � 146 � � - �� -- S 016p-- I - - - S= -D. 290 .- - �T - --- - - , - -- - --- - - -- } I � Q t+., a I � S= -0. 15 �1 i � I� `o o , j i � 144 . g � - - — - — -- -- I - - -- -- - 8 lF�?..I ? 1 144 � o, o� PR F2E� Grot� ta7.96 Y S Q ' rE IN�(5)= 1a4. 0 ��?8p h y Sco%: Noriz. 1�20' !E OfIIT (N)= ! .30 � 142 - - I W � I ✓erf. /" 2' I 142 � � � �-- - - � ---- - - -. .- � - - - - - - - - - - N� �- �'f �O b � � <O v� O � h n O v1 h ,� n N �f. _� �•Ol W!p.-._. Q1 �V_ O �'7 __ �O h ___N b ^ 1� o� O� N�N �o.W o h oi � �t1 O� N n '7��aD O �f n •� o n O� '�! b O � 1� n r� "]I Ol O �O b I cV "')i O O h oD 'f h "1 aD O �A �O <V "1 I Oi Oi�,'�F 7�Of aD `r '") a0 �I ry h �l � N �f v �h v �') � h ^� �"] "'1 n1 N N N � �i � •� •� ' •� O O O O O O Oi O Oi oi Oi Oi � 4]�� 4l t� ri 1� f� c0 �O tti w h � h I h h Y1 h h V1 h h h h �1 h h h h h h h w h�h h h ^ h Y'1 �1 h 'F �1 '�F �Y � ? � V `F V � 7 �f `7 V V� `F - w '-___.� w . _ ..� .� .� w - .� .� .� w - __. w w .� .� .� .� w .� .� .� .� .� .� .� w w .� w .� .� .� w � 6,00 � 6 40 6 80 , 7 ?0 -- _-- 7 60_ - - 8 00 -- - - - � f 0 40 _ - - - - - 8.40--_ . 8 BO_ 9 f20 9 60 _ __ - f 0 00 ---- Da7E qEV�S�Orr N0. Br �, £xp. 12/.31/03 SHEET -- �;oES��EO a� �. �eR��M �.�Pf��oy � Fu �,� � _ ,� ��<<, H A L L B O U L E V A R D DRAYVN BY: gpp �+-'••�� 9�50 S.W Commerte Circk LZ - -- --- --- -- - - - Q ' '� s6 vs � W�sonvlik. Oregon 97070 , CHECKED BY: MJD ��sf- �6�, ssociates, Inc. , � �:� STREET 8. UTILITIES IMPROVEMENTS 4 - ----- - - - -- - I DATE: 1-25-03 � ``9e ,,, ConeulUn6 En6ineen k Survr�on L _ SCALEt AS SHQWN +w��N�'��`�s. PHONE (S03) 682-2450 �ITY OF TIGARD PLAN d PROFILE OF 24 --- - �- �`" �AX� 682-�0�8 FI�E LOCAnON: HALBASE.DwG � ',�PROJECT NO. 02.61a.11B ENGiNEERING DEPARTMENT . �� o� , -�-- -� rL 40� Slo 2+77.31, Canslruct N PLAN ' GXrSr ce I i J - ,„ j� 8O0 , rote J56 23 � Ho!/O B/vd 1 CG-2 I ' - „F , Scole: 1'=20' ' _ O �S ' Abondo ,, � � O � i I i EX/ST. 4'P✓C OD ExisL Wetlond � i i . _.-_ i•. _ c,5 , ,. . � P�.�N P.�F?ll.r'�E�� ii � O 2 � � s,a o.�i� y, PlP£ 15 W : � � � - ;�:�� ;L� — _ — I ON.r.--Hr,[!" Git:.,:i�AL SCA i {�� "� � , , liE=�so. � - . � _L_ � ; / W _ =��n � 11Jf80.13 __ � _- i. i s I ' - i I fxisf CB _ 1 ' il ' ' � End sidewalk. (Pennan�'nt �-� ��c •' ,. ,' � 1 � ��Grote 156.18 `i , 750 I Bo�ricoda-on s/gnrng plpn) ,�-----�-�s.__-----,�-_�Y _ =ti—� I i fx;sf CB � �I �-- - � Back o/ wolk = 146.62 �' ., - ---- - ( ----�� t—� � ' � Grote 155.1 I � �cs c�£ � � .,. . .� �-- � _ ^ � -- � � �,too H.4LL BL 1/D. I �s, � . - - � p -�� , �2�0o Exrsr E .: - ' . � { '^ 1 Sfo 10+73. 23.55'77f+ 1,3f00 � � r"� Remove exist. �y � - -� - " ' 1 B� 51L Culve�t � Construct 0007 inlet CC-7 '�? _ l - --�— - - 1�i _; Reconslrucl chonne/ - --„'_� _ _ . �� .. r, � � -- I O -- � �_ - � ��- - - ''�- --- ' - �-- - "=�_`, --- --�--� _—�',r�� _ - - � l; � 1 4 '� �---- - Remove Culverf � \ � Sto l 1+40.14, 18.91' RT .��-�" s � ------ I J I ` � Co c�ete C Ivert A// cu1 s/opes �n � £nd sfd cu�b, motch � � q '�? S= 0.0310 p%pe ou1//ow oreo � ' �- bock o/ wo/k. 24' Conc culv rf + U I Relocote ex�st - - - � _ _ _ • j --- ------_ to be 2> Mox. End project. �• �yy Exrst !?'D.[t � FH. 27" RT � >,,, .. r._.-c lf J52.09 '{ I � - �54 C.O.T. deloil Construct Bridgeioil tronsition I 153 Q =- _ �L _ BR203 � I i � ! Construct 50 LF uardroil Irom - - - _ _ onc. ADA Rom 9 T I � � I Z R0755 Option D_ exist bridge roil (See ODOT DRC � q/�,�2, PUE I � -� - - - -NQ_�8203, R0400, RD405, RD4)0, to )0+85.14, 25' RT � R0415, ER0425, £RD430, ERD440, , - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ I I � � PLAN 12� Conc Sco%: J'"=!0 t 10+$�.6�ir&.91'f?� . & ERD450) ' I cu/verl i I I FANNO I - �E 152.34 1 _ EX,Sr s MH t dord'cu�b t�onsition. -- f�;m- 5.45 CHEEK All overheod utilities to � . New m 156.92 ��See wr�ter quolity - , _ plons � I PGE Pole 03046� _ be ploced underground � �_ - .,�,:,� �,I � I os relocated by �f _ i9EG//1�4 LN - �- _ � J , � ,, - - . - 1 - I - - - i- , ,.},� i �i �� ' I L# I 1 � I I U �.i 1 N ' � I� I i rso J � Protile grode'uC gut{er 2 i Rt T - - - -- ----� - � --- -� . --� --- - � - - -- - --- I TC ProfNe'grade +7' � I � � R�w � � I N �i y o� ,i • -- _ � `� I I � �^ rn I �� 8� PU£ � I W �h +h ; w v^ry ': _--- ---- - - ' 14s --- °o � '! � ' m �hh� , W �or o .� � p � �; a i I � o�� ^ � II �W v � II I I W , ^ �I U h II II � �'�1 ql � � w N . �3" I + �" i, o m ~ ., v� �d v�i3`' ° o �1 v `+'-�II �6� w ` I .!n rI1 � �a "�m I 146 �2° � 4i �i a�Z`� + 'n - --- -- -- - � VJ - �.U v u _°', f - -- - - ----- ---• --- - -- ----I � � _' , +� + tjWW W O � - .`W��j ExIsG grode�at C� /^ S= - 0291 ��' __ E I�t. EoF �� `i \1/ � - 1 'Rt e! _ 2:1 Mox. � S= -0. 310 - -i - -- -° j� � � � O S -0.0199 i � - - - I s= -o.�zs� - I 154 - + �� I I I N 142 � °ro 4i _ � T ' - —- j �--_ __ ---- -- -- -- � -D - ` U , - --- � � � I -- ° � c.or = ras.�� -� ` - -- N `� 3 (S)°-13 i � � ' 140 �st. 24" Conc. . � � r ----- - - - = 0.0272 Cu/v�t y - - - - --- -- -- -- , _ _ Q 1£ O T (f)= 1 1.91 - -_ � q ' Sco%: y ' -- - _ _ - ----�F I - B- cF �z" �s-v , � o PHOF/LE ! 150 - -- -- — - so �4.�=� W r o.ozeo a o� o.;l. �"= o' __ _-- - - — - . l�'erl. 1"_�" r� I �Jr� t --�_ o , I - - — - -- - r - -- 1 — � - -- - --- - - -- - - - ---- - -- - - - — -- -- ; � a a�- , _ � ---- -- - °� � i Scale: 1 "= 10' Horrz. ; m w � -- — j - - -- ---- — � -- , W �` , � aa N ' r3s � 1 "- 2' Vert. � a o' � 'o � vi vi vi �n r v r v I - - - �"� � Remove ex/s. 18" I - - -- - --- - - - - --- �� `,°* I� Sfl. culverf �V O �O h ^ O �O h �V O n a t� ^ W ��7 V '�F V `F �t 7 7 F V Q 7 �� .._.._ I � f w - �o eo_ t r 20 - - ~_ . -w _ __ - __ — . - -- - _ - � 46 � � .. � _ .. � - � -- - -- — - - . --- 146 _- - -�i r�.so �7 00 �2 <o- - �z ' - - -- -- - - --- - - so _ _ ' - _ _ r s i - 1+00 1+40 1+80 2+20 DATE I RENSIpN I N0. BY I Exp. 1?�31�03 SHEET _ _._ . _ _ . ___ . — - . - .. -- � _- �' ____ __ DESIGNED BY: N. IBRAHIM ,�,RED-PROf<1'� Suite 300 -AGC Cenler -- _- ___ ____ � �,�«4 �y � DE HAAS 9450 SW Commerce�„�� E V A R D _- -- - L3 DRAwN BY. BPD y.'". n � ve 95 Klsomrilk,Oreqon 97070 CHECKE� Br: MJD ��' � � i"„ - - - - __ � 7�� ssociates, Inc. � STREET 8, UTILITIES IMPROVEMENTS 1 DnrE: a-25-03 � , qb ,,, Coneullin` EnLineen k sun��oro •�•. S _ _- - ---- - - -- - - � � sc��E: ns sr+owrr kiq��N��S ��o"��so3��e 2-245o CITY Of TIGARD PLAN d PROFILE �F 24 FILE LOCATION: HALBASE.DWG � PROJECT N0. 02.641.118 ENGINEERING OEPARTMENT .,' . 3 --{ i � , - • GEN£RAL NOTfS: I IJ O- I � I 1O P�otect ol1 trees on s�te. �i + I� I PLAN R�DUCED TO � � I " �\ I Q►�-tir,►a- l��t.ali�AL SCALE — _ _ SEC TI ON A--A j , "��a,y � � � � VARIES I � o �� I / �� ^ € � CONSTRUCTION NOTES: r � �`°�,� � 22r�ez B�anket plonted with \ � � 2 O �o_. I \ . notive herboceous seed mix, „ �� u 3 � . � � ' � � . _� red-os�er dogwood, and 22• lO£xisting buildings to be removed by ofhers. J I ' � +�_.o � � willow stokes to m� � ^� o a � erosion. O2 Construcf woter quolity swole. -� m �, � y �, _ �� ui�� y^�s�µ � �p V U� A in`a w a�� TOP OF BANK � ` � ��Mn<°.e:4.�,r"`"� O3 Construcf difch inlet. See Detoil B and C. I ' J c� ,�' v_ �� t. � � '� �'��a o .�� ` J .- �f� a / ' . ` '4Y � ..[,Q >wnt�n.E wa,ro c arN,e- V p� w'�uwat M O4 Connect fo new storm sewer in street. Begin woter= Q � - oN'-� / �FANNO CREEK - "" �,„„«,,;;,,�,��„k,ra. I 5 quality JoCility bid item I �'�j. � o i T ��z / ; �r� ` / w yM-9""`°�""'�"°`� I v / v� w o9a ° UT ALL STRUCTURE ��'••- A + �>>a O Construct inlet llowpod, lul! width o/ channel. I i�I� ��o i i � PIAN ..•..- r,.oy y:�.o ' I IE=139.65f ��rK•«�� awaot.n c.acowc��.v 6O Reseed swole ofter groding. See londscope plons. , �` I � o i � � . — � '4 �,,,„a,,,t,��,�.n �� '� � � `T � xaMnasor�o� � V1 �' �f Iff e..y�re -,�.k�w+0.7 O7 /nsfoll sedimentory monhole. See Defoil D. ' o o ). J�' 12" Monifold .s a�Kw,EU �� Rim= t145.00, 1£ in= 14123, lf out= 141.15 � I�� ' O �� i f � ��• � Q F 20' long w/10 eoch 6 ' � - *a�� i � ' '��' �' outlel es � 2' OC � Sump= 134.73. � �I I + � '10 P�P ��a..,�.d.. '^ ' I �� I ^ � 4 � -:�, i� --- " / ^°� ^�^ OS Locote ond abondon exisf;ng weN with concrefe �1� I � I o „\� 2 `DITCH INLET � Z m occo�donce with Ore gon Woter � s 1 A � � b�� Resources �equi�ements. (By Others) I �� ' �, = a � IE IN=140.35 �, 4, "''s � �� '�' �� I I I ' o D I��.OUT=140.35 i � . ,... . � 9O Hydroseed ony disturbed oreas not covered by I , ii 40+73 ! �� ' - , . ^..:.. „�,,,, _ _ � `E OUT= �4191' f-p 6 LF °"°�'"'°� londscoping plons. II�-; 12 �7 � , r1 -- " ' " '^ 6- I I' I S_1.07•�onc. f:'^'.o� �I I V'I � �� I I � -EROSION CO�TROL FENCING W� _, �' � � I�� I 1 n ... ,.... � s�cna+�-� � �� , �qq � � � �� . - - _ �F i Ii; �A � -_ _ — —, . � i � � z x6 xi8� ��-- I �I I - J IE=140.76 CLASS 50 RIP RAP I I + I _ _- 15.98LF �C,r�.� WATER QUALITY � MANHOLE �0.�+ S?� �i�, �Z , � I �� /�fE IN=141.23 � I owwxnHC no. s�s •"�'�"" � I LIIE OUT=141.15 � � �II � � � I � � � � s ��i�oo YR F�oo� P�AiN DETAIL D :.. - - �; �� N � ' scacE: �"-10� � � � �v � I 35' J o Isp� I �',_Q B� � __�r , ..__ � � ' i - i � . . . � _- , - - -- I 1 �, .�,,,,.��a,� R W i / i J A A Ex tin Hou9e � secna��-� 12 to be�emo d � J �.�.�*�� ...,�..�,. '�I ,.. .., ,,, � j PU£ ' bY others _� ; I - t -- ---- }148 i .� `� � � � -�- - I _— --� fxistin� Ground I �� I � --`L h e �I �� 144' 68 I` � �o o c I 144 N �\- . i con , �1'P� ` - . -- - -. - - ---- ---- I L 12" C7 -- - - t _� - "-- _� + o a f I �..'..°` r � r ' � � II i �- N i � o B B 140 S- O.OI Bottom o/ swole ' ,` �' 4 � � �., i '.-� + � I - � ;. , �ao :� � - - - — - — - - ;-- -!- — j sECnoN B-e � � _ _ - - - - ? � � � � �2' Pvc s o.o� , ,; , ; '. ;z „T.,,�,��,,.... ; m �, rs. s cF �2° c�6-v ��,�. I, ; , ' r `; —L � 0..4.<...n.w i U .; I b S=i0.0244 I I I i i I I - �.�> �`�r �Y «��.�.:�..`F— f��/C J l} ��. '. . ..� I I � ,,.. � � -. _O �I� -_ . - p . I . i . _ - . ' OO 1 _ i _+� i � W/O er 5'ur108Cy� J � 1.36 ,' SECTION A-A SECTI N B-B 136 �- i u� _ - f h --- F � rcmc o O ------- ��- j � -I �� -- I N - -- - --� - 4 Q/03 ' , � i � , + I � `i � I� � { e� ., � n�,�,W �.�z r N� o � u � ' ' I � � - - 1 _—.. _ _ sQ_ rsz � „� PLAN , . _ _ __.. -�� o + �u ; �SCALE: I �, �u 4l �j- - -- - --- - -�- ___��i'� ' � i.sr�`i��n+`na.'a.W w�v"/.•=r�.°nm�.i.:`ro:u m a wQ..�R,ro�ma�.sw.. :an.o.,ry wn auaE.e a rowm�ru¢m�a�a wu wti.a w•�nocn�o m n wa .nc ' �o ° p � �'� 1� = 20"HORIZ. � I .,��.��.«, .,oa.x�iK.�w.,.TM�a�..,�..�vw..am� � . I� � .,'> II j � 1� = 4� L'fR7, i ti..o DITCH INLET ' 128 �I o � ' w W � ' 12B -j DITCH INLET ��,�� FRAME AND GRATE C7nnW�er�scv�ca, � ---} 3 -- - --- , ---- -- - -�-- 7n ORANING N0.�60 awff0 o]-DJ Ov�.lrr�,.r. C .� I I OIIAMNO HQ 2!D Rv�W-ai o��rrr�+r � DETAIL C -� �lo II I � ' � ! ' - {, DETAIL B 124 _L L L C , F^ C' , L 24 . - -- ��•"` ' �1�I�/ 1+60 2+00 2+40 2+80 3+ � r � 0+00 0+40 0+ 20 - - - - - - - - ��;� G�::�` y,--?• - - DATE �. RE�151pN Ii N0. BY Exp. l2/3J/03 �J• 11,0/Y '/ �� SHEET ' _._ . .._ . . . . . 1 - P : _ ___ ; j�DESGNEDBY BA �.�af° sy ��_ KURAHASHI HALL BOULEVARD o, - _�. . ._._ _. __--_"__.- _. . ____ . .--__ _ _ S Mfl� q O . __ .____ ___ �.._ i DRANN BY� - ' - - - - - - -- ------- � tG0 �SSO IATES. NC. CHECKED BY 4,iD OR N ___ __ � •ler Resowcea S T R E E T E M E N T S t— _ _ —_ _ a2 �E°��«�� . • � 8, UTILITIES IMPROV ,� + o�rE �-zs-o3 ��,,.`9e A� �U!Y�5 �9 daupe ArcAltacWre . Plsmm�t y � � � 2 Environmenlel . Sunerin� 0 f i --- - - _ , o�"e� �C` ,_,— p � � SCALE AS SHOWN �N� r�. �,S I5500 sw �sY sir«i, s��t� zoo CITY OF TIGARD WATER QUALITY FACIUTIES PLAN 'J '� v� Beeverlon Oregon 9'7008 ENG�NEERING DEPARTMENT L� FILE LOCATION: � ' ��. �. .. � " , PROJECT NO. 02.61l.118 K p'� (509)841--68�2 lex (50�)8��-9771 _' �k P 1Z 3! �3 f . ' ' --- ---- _Y— i_- �`---sz--------------------- — — — — � _ ------------ — ----------- .� (n � HALL BL VD. -------- � � PLAN — J � Sco%: 1"=20' � I W ��— P.o.c. — — 2 , --�- � ,, � , -- � — � U � — — — — — — � � � . — — � � 12" PUE �� — � � � 1 � Q1 —' — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ' ^i �- / — I � 1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — � — — —� — � I r — — — — — _�— — — — i A D � � � I � � � C 1' 2.5 1' 1.5 1"D20 \�� I � WA1ER $ERVI(� FOR I �I� � I I � � IRRIGATION. WILL BE � I PROVIDm BY OTHER � � I I I I I I — - - TO R/W.L1NE � � � � � t' 15 � � � . 1' :'',:;,,.•:�::`.—•—• � - i IRRIGATION LEGEND I i r 3. �. � SYIABOL DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER MODEL NO. PSI RADIUS GPI.1 I � • ROTOR HEAD RAINBIRD T-6—PC—T40 — 35 35' 1.9(Q), 3.3(H) I 1 � �.s(o): 3.o(H) �oM O ro � � SPRAY HEAD RAINBIRD 1806-SAM-PRS-ISVAN 30 15' .4 - 1.2 SOURCE M R $y57E�� DRIP ZONE RAINBIRD LD-09-18-250 35 N/A 1.0/GPH � � WATER METER - BY OTHERS P.O.0 - POINT OF CONNECTION \ � aPRESSURE REGUTATOR - WILKINS 500 - 2' SEf TO 60 PSI (SiMILAf2 70 3/LS5) / � Q REMOTE CANTROL VALVE- RlUNBIRD P� (SEE 3/LSS) IRRIGATION PLAN NOTES ` � REMOTE CONTROL VALVE— RAINBIRD XCZ-100 COA1 (SEE 4/LS5) \ � Q QUICK CWPLER-44RC — RAINBIRD 1. CALL UTIUTIES FOR LOCATIOi� PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. � H ISOLATION VALVE — SEE SPECIFlGTIONS AND 6/LSS 2• SYSTD�A IS DESIGNm FOR 60 POUNDS OF PRESSURE AND 45 GPM AT WATER QUALlTY FACII.JTY THE SHUTOfF VALVE TO OPERATE THE SYSTEM. VERIFY PRESSURE AND — SEE CML DRAINI�JGS N BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE (SEE 2/LSS) VOLUTAE BEFORE INSTALLATIGN !WD NOTIFY OWNER IF THERE IS A — WATfS MODEL 007M1—QT 2� — DOUBLE CHECK IN BOX 16� MINIAIU6A DISCREPANCY. / � 3_ LOCAiE ALL VALVES IN PLANTING BEDS WHERE POSSIBLE. I C CONTROLLER — A RAINBIRD ESP-12MC W/ PED—DD16 PEDESTAL (SEE 1/L55) 4. VERIFY DIMENSIONS ANO LOf.ATI�NS OF ALL NEW PLANTiNG AND LAWN � ' ' � ' ' B� BY OTHERS AREAS ON SRE. NOT)FY OWNER OF ANY DEIMTIONS fROM PIAN PRIOR 70 ,i AAlWUAL DRNN VAWE— CHAMPION 200RS (NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE CONS7RUCT10N. I ALL DRAIN VALVES TO DRNN ALL LOW AREAS OF PIPE.) (SEE 5/LS5) 5_ TREE LOCATIONS SFWLL BE STAlCED BY CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED BY OWNEF2 PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF NEW IRRIGATION SYSTEAA. STATION NUMBER 6. INSTALL QUICK COUPUNG VAI:'ES A MINIMUM OF 200' ALONG MNNLINE � S AREA DESIGNATION; FG—FlELD GRASS D—DRIP WQ—WATER QUALfTY AND AS SHOWN ON PUWS. (SEE 9/lS5) 2" 35 �OW IN GPM 7. IN5TALL AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER AT LOCATION SHOWN ON PUW ON VALVE SIZE SPECIFlm PEDESTAL AS PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFlCATIONS. VERIFY 1N�TH � OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATIUN. IXTEND CONTRO� WIRE CONOUR FROM LATERAL UNE CIASS 200 WC —(BURY 12" MINIMUM) (SEE 7/LSS) CONTROLLER AND DAYLIGHT SIX INCHES INTO PLANTING BED FOR I INST,4L.LATION OF AUTOMATIC 'JALVE WIRES. LATERAL L1NE DRIP UNE HEADER CONNECTION (SEE 3/LS6) 8. BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVIC'ES SFiALL BE LOCATED A �IINIMUM OF 5"-0' — 1 TEMPORARY U\TERNL LJNE —CIASS 200 PVC — W RESISTANT.(SEE 2/LS6) 9. MAINLINE�S SHO DL4GRAMIAATICALLYE.�L pCpTE pqRALLEL TO PAVING � _ _ _ = SLEEVE CIASS 160 PVC — SIZE 6' OR AS OTHERWISE NOTED SEE 8 LS5 W��N P��NG ARE/lS. � � � 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL AD.IUST `VAN' SPRAY HEADS TO PROVIDE COMPLEfE Pt.A�! !?��!!CED TO � -- — 1 1/2' MWN L1NE CLASS 200 WC —(BURY 18� MINIMUM) (SEE 7/LSS) ��GE OF PLANT BED AND MINIMIZE OVERSPRAY ONTO ADJACENT ��-Hhl.r (�r-Sivi�VAL SCA�.E WALKS, STREETS, STRUCTURE:i, OR OTHER HARO SURFACES. —F-- —� TEMPORARY I.WN L1NE CLASS 200 PVC — W RESISTANT (SEE 2/LS6) DA7E RENSION NO. BY G1STER DESIGNED BY: BJW �-��zn . � ��1 �' H A L L B O U L E V A R p SHS�T DRAWN BY: g,�W GreenWorks, P.C. D�ED 84-23-03 � o�oN ,�w `°�`°°'"`�'"�`�` STREET 8. UTILITIES IMPROVEMENTS Zo �w��d� 1s Hw a,a•.a„K.s�n�ioo SCALE: AS SHOwN J'�, � POftlQb-��9°^9�� CITY OF TIGARD IRRIGATION PLAN : HALL BOULEVARD - NORTH OF A FlLE LOCATION: 2276_C_DWG PROJECT NO. 102276.1 '9l'E A1z�' S0.7.ZU56�1 ENCMEERING DEPARTIAENT 2y .► , . . ---- �� ---- ��/ ��---sZ----------- --- — — -- — —__ _�� _ _ ------------- — — — — �, -------- TREE W LL. AERATION DRAINAGE ----------- ' 0 - r�n I �s �s " HALL BL VD ---- PLAN "+ sco%: 1'=2p• � J -- � F— � - - - - W / � � /� � � � f0' 7YP.\\ � \ W � ---L— —�_ — Cn /r• . \ . . . . / \ � + o +�� 't+ .��• ` .•+ :. ♦�o � ■ � I � + + ♦ � . 2 Q . . . .+ . � '� , • .+. . . . , ,� � U — . _ � �. ' _ . . r . . � , 2 P �__ ' ` + +�+ ++ +++++ + � \ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - 12"PUE� �+� + +- ±/ � Q — � - - - - - - - - ��— _ � _ _ _ � � I � �/ - -� �- - - - - �! - - — .—�- - - - - - - - - - � � � � � � � � � � - - - ' �ry ' - - � _ � I . . � � PLANT LEGEND '' I I �. TREES 4 NOTES: �' � � / � � .' I : i \ �ss ( + I �IXISTING TREES 1• ALL PLJINTING AREAS, SW1LL BE IRRK.ATEp UTILIZING A FULLY •• I TO REMNN UNDISTURBm- 7ypICAL �0►�NTiC UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYS'TEM, SEE SHEETS LS1, LS2. i \� �/ - _ .� 2. ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL RECENE TQPSOIL, SOIL AMENDMENTS, + QUERCUS RUBRA AND MULCH PER SPECIFlCATlONS •• I I RED OAK - 3' CAL, Bdcg, BRANCHm AT 6' 3. qLL p�pNJS SHALL BE �NSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PLANTING . 1 ULMUS PHRVIFOLIA ��Ta� �D SPECIFlCATIONS � v . LACEBARK ELM - 2 1/2' CAL., B&B, BRANCHED AT 6' 4. DO N07 PLANT IN PUBLJC UTILIT`( FASMENTS (P.U.E.) I / 5. INSTALL R00T BARRIER ALONG ALL Sii1tWALK AND CURBS WITHIN 20' FAGUS SYLVATICA 'PURPUREA' OF TREE TRUNKS. SEE SPECIFlCATIONS !WD 8/LS6. � � � � � EUROPEAN BEECH - 2 1/2' CAL, BdcB, BRANCHED AT 6' • \ ` � �CERCIS OCCIDENTALIS KEY NOTES: - WESTERN REDBUD - 2" CAL, BdcB, BRlWCHm AT 6' � � \ 1O APPROXIAIATE PIPING UYOUT FOR AEf�AT10N/DRNNAGE SY$7EM. � SHRUBS GROUNDCOVER 5 6 ��MUM �o' SPAGNG BETWEDJ PIPE RUNS. � \ WATER QUNJfY FACILITY LS6 L56 � IN FACE OF ROCK WALL SEE 7/LS6. •+ - $� (�L DRAWI�IGS ` � I�w cHn.oExs�s pp 3s' �sun� c�nw4r�cE rn4wc�. . . . COI�ST SIRAWBERRY - 4' POTS. 12' O.C. ei:!!�l� I MNiONIA AQUIFOLIUM 'COMPACTA' , � � � , � I I COMPACT OREGON GRAPE - 1 GAL CONT. - 3' O.C. � I�CTOSTAPHYLLOS WA-URSI I � K�NNIKINNICK - 1 GAL CONT. - 3' O.C. �CORNUS SERICEA 'KELSEII' � � DWARF Rm11MIG DOGWOOD - 1 GAL. CONT. - SPACE AS SHOWN n_ �CORNUS SERICEA 'BAILEYI' � I REDTWIG DOGWOpD - 5 GAL CONT. - SPACE AS SHOWN � I WAT� QUALlTY FACILfTY (SIDE SLOPES) � I SEE SPECIFlCATIONS FOR SEED MIX I� I WA� QUALITY FACILfTY (BOTTOM) � / / f � ' -.-;s:l SEE SPECIFlCATIONS FOR FORB MIX �1 I►�u+rnE FlE�ncw�ss PLAN R�DUCED TO � / SEE SPECIFlCAl10NS FOR SEED MIX ONE-HALF pRIviNAL SCALE / _ � � � / DATE RENSION NO. gy G�STE DESIGNED BY: BJW �-� z �Q1 �' H A L L B O U L E V A R D SHEET • LS 4 DRANN BY: g,�yy GreenWorks, P.C. CHEpCED BY: 9�FAHA U taw:ao.n.e�e.�t..e DA7E: t-23-03 � QR�I� �W �µ«�-��d� STREET � UTILITIES IMPROVEMENTS 22 2�NM by A�,y�Me 100 O� SCALE: AS SHOWN J' �ti P��a a.,�,8�2� CI TY OF TIGARD PLANTING PLAN : HALL BOULEVARD - NORTH FlLE LOCATION: 2276_C.DWG �1�� ENGINEERING DEPARiMENT 24 PROJECT NO. 102276.1 '9�'E ARG + ' y D E HAAS uite 300-AGC Center y� % 1-150 SW Commerce Circle •�• • • �Vilsonville,OR.97070 �, . .� g- � (503)682-2450 �8�� SS�C�C��es, I nc. ($03)682-4018 Fax � ConsultingEngineers d Surveyo�s ��V��V October 14, 2003 Brad Kilby -Associate Planner `?'�T 14 2003 City of Tigard �=��Y OF T�GARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd. �� A��`��E��roE�'RtNG Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Hall Blvd. Culvert Extension Sensitive Lands Review(SLR) 2003-00009 Dear Brad: Your staff report of 10/2/03 indicates you do not have in hand the approval of Oregon DSL. Attached is the approval DSL Application Number 30482-GA(6/11/03) along with a recent 10/8/03 extension of time to construct. Sincerely, , � �J/j�� `. -�/ -'-�' _ ,��, �-Y�� , �,� s Marlin J. DeHaas, P.E., P.L.S. President�� cc: 02.644.118 Vannie Nguyen Attachments MJD/lo 6441tr.1014 IN-WATER TIMING EXTENSiON THIS FORM IS A MODIFICATI�N TO YOUR PERMIT. ATTACH THIS COPY TO YOUR PERMIT AND KEEP ON SITE DURING ACTIVE C�NSTRUCTION Permit or Authorization Number: 30482-GA Permit Holder: City of Tigard Project Address: Pinebrook Cresk and Hall Boulevard Name of Water Body: Pinebrook Creek Conditioned In-Water Timing: June 1 to September 30, 2003 Approved ln-Water Timing: June 1 to October 30,2003 Reasons for Requesting Extension: Extension of a culvert on Pinebrook Creek ODFW Concurrence: YES Biologist Name: Jim Grimes Date: October 7, 2003 In-water work extension approved under the following co�ditfons. All other permit conditions of the permit Attachment A or authorfzation are in force and effect: • The bypass dlversion shall use a gravity bypass pipe for the flow dlversion method only. • The concrete headwall shall only be poured during dry condltlons to minimize the discharge of concrete and concrete talnted water into the creek channel. • Newly poured concrete shall be adequateiy protected lrom surface water contact until cured. • Wash water from the concrete work shall not enter the creek or storm water system until ii has been adequately neutralized. � l,��+� � o - �r - 0.3 DSL Region Manager �ate Post-It•Fax Note 7671 ��o pape,b► Z To � F � n De � � e Co..D � J:1_FormslAuthorizationslln•Water Tlming Extenslon F� Phone N Phone� ,�� - 37 F�� -03 O - �d F� J r.3 �� --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Di�ision of State 50Ci-378-4844 hbn Oct 13 2003 03:12:OCi PM PDT Page 2 of 2 �- . � 4-1�'./LJ'��l_111j a_G• 1� ��J.J!�CI DG1 POSt-it'F2x Note 7671 Oate r^�6 03 paqoc� � t0 - �"�•,,e To �Yl QAS From �/LLML!G G t: ..� regon �o,�� S �o. �. 0 Phone r c„i �q,,, �q, ,r,., Phone tl 3\ �p' � r n J(l/ D:G •+'�-4.7v � � 7 Tlueodore R.Kulongoski,Govem�r `` �� Fe.� �3 �� (��g Fqx N � G -O 5� r � ; June 11, 2003 ;��N � 3 2003 U �WOregonstateldnds.us. f 1 State Land 6oardr� �,. . �j �...�� 11U lb cMO�soaes HRD CITY OF TIGARQ i Theodore R. Kulongoski ATTN: VANNIE NGUYEN Govemor 13125 SW HALL BLVD ; �TIGARD OR 97223 t 8i11 Bradbury i, Scactary of State R�; General Authorization for Transpo�tion-Related Structures �ndall Edwards DSL Application Number 30482- A' tate Treasur�T T02S, R02E, Section 1 D Tax Lo 300 8� 600, City of Tigard, Washington �ounty , � pear Ms. Nguyen: � Qn May 19, 20d3, we received your complete applicatian to extend a culvert on Pinebrook Creek, a tributary of Fanno Creek, for the widening of Hall Boulevard. 8ased on our review of your application, and comments provided by interested resource agencies, we hereby authorize the project, subject to the conditions outlined in OAR 141-089-0190 (enclosed) and to the following additional conditions: 1, Fill and removal activities in Pinebrook Creek shall be conducted between June 1 ! and September 30, unless otherwise coordinated with �DFW and approved in � writing by ODSL. This authorization permits only the work described in the application. Please notify this office when the work is complete. If additional work �eeds to be done in the future, a new application must be submitted. This authorization expires January 1, 2Q�6. Please be aware that this authorization is not a land use approval. You must also receive authorization, when required, from the �ocal planning department and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers before beginning construction. If you have any questions regarding this autho�ization or its conditier�s;— — - please contact Colin MacLaren at extension 244. Sincerely, � �ori Warner Manager Field Operations — Western/Eastern Reglan GM:cw �f1CIOSU(@ �; Kathryn Harris, Corps of Engineers i Todd f�lshury, t�DFW CIT1'OF 71GAfip/Ftly,L BLVD.OUTFALI GROJEC7 P.. ,OF B tW�52003 P�IBLIC MEAftING STAFF REPORT TO TNE tiE,qftINGS OFFICER - ---------------------—----- ---- ----- ------ -- ----- -------—------------------------- -- --- - :E�'.0�2003 55:04 NO.e04 D08 The applicant has provided a letter from Greg Berry, P.E., indicating that the proposed outfali will remove about forty cubic yards of material, make the improvement, and restore the grade back to its natural state. Any exCess soil will be disposed of off site. He indicates thatlhere will be no alterations within the floadplain that will reduce floodplain storage or the ability ol tha fl4odplain to maintain the zerarise floodway. 7his criterion has been satisfied. Land form alterations or developments within tha 100•ysar floodplain shall bs allowed only in areas designated as contmercial or lndustriaf on the comprehenslve plan land use map, except that alterations or developmonts associated with community reCreation uses, utilities, or public support facflfties as defined in Chapter 18.120 af the Community DevelopmenE Code shall be allowed in areas designated residential subject to applfcable zoning standards; The alterations that are proposed within the floodway are proposed to accommodate placemenl of the stormwafer outfall. These items are identified as utilities within Chapter 18.120 of the Tigard Development Code (TDC)and are, tharefore, permitted activities w�thin the 100-year floodplain. This criterion is satisfied. f�loodp�la n it willfnat restulta n�any incr asePn the wate�u�rface elevatlon of�the 1 OQ year flood; As discussed ear(ier, the applicant has indicated that no proposed activity will increase the water surface elevation of the 100-year flood. If the grade�s brought back fo its natural state, staff concurs. This criterion is satisfied. The land form alteration or development plan includes a pedestrfan/bicycle pathway in accordance with the adapted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan, unless the construcfion of sald pathway is deemed by the Hearings Officer as untimefy; The Fanno Creek Trail system will be located an the site consistent with the Regional Transportation Plan, and the adopted Transportation Systems Plan. The construction of the trail has been previously conditioned with the approvaf of the conditional use permit for the new City �.ibrary. Additionally, the City has pbtained a $50,000 grant to ensure consiruction of that portion of the trail. This criterion is met. The plans for the pedeslrianlbicycle pathway indlcate that no pathway will be below the elevatlon oT an average annual flood. This crite�ion is not applicable to this proposal. The necessary U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board, Divfslon of State Lands (D5L)appravals shali be obtained; artd The applicant has provided proof of approval for the work from the US Army Co s of �ngineers, but has not pravided approval from the Oregon Division of State Lands(DSL� FINDING: The applicant has not provided any evidence that would indicate that no thep 1001year flt od�wa 9oT DSUS A my Corps orftEngi�eers has s sued adp rm t for the work dated July 22, 2003. CONDITIONS: y Prior to site work, the applicant shall provide evidence in writing irom the Oregon DSL. that the proposed work is approved. % The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval that are required by the decision �ssued by Ihe U5 Army Corps of Engineers dafed July 22, 2003. CiTV OF TIGARDMA�L BLVD.011TFA��PROJEC7 � 10/1y�Op3 Pl1BliC ME4RING PAGE 6 4F B C�ecc ocnne.rn r�....,,,,,,,,,,,,,�.___ -'-'---'--'-'--------'-----'------'-'-'------------�---'-'-'--"-""'--------------'---"---'------"- �o i_,-��a� es:ea N0.804 DN9 � �, �`� Where�iand fo .m alteratiq1��andlo�d vel pfient are atlowed n and adjaCent to the 100-year ff0o�l�airi; ihe Gity shall,require tFia�oqsideratian� �pi�tion of_sufficient opon land ar a witf�ftt and ad)aceht to the floodplain`"in accordance 'w�th the comprehensfve plan. Thls area shall include portions of a suitable elevation�for the ...... •�....�:.... ..s � .....a..�a...�.,M:......1.. .....L........ ....al.:.. �1... n.....J..l..�.. .d%�n.. ,��fh