SLR2006-10005 NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION
SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 200G-10005 '�
LANPHERE ENTERPRISES
:
DRAINAGEWAY RELOCATION ' ' �
120 DAYS = 9/15/2006
SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY
FILE NAME: LANPHERE ENTERPRISES DRAINAGEWAY RELOCATION
CASE NOS.: Sensitive Lands Review(SLR) SLR2006-10005
Tree Removal Permit(1RE) TRE2006-00010
PROPOSAL: The applicant requests a Type II Sensitive Lands Review approval to teroute a
drainageway into an existing drainage ditch. In addition, the applicant requests a tree
removal petmit to remove one tree (7"in diameter)in the drainage ditch.
APPLICANT: Peter F. Fry ENGINEER Andrew Jansky
2153 SW Main Street# 105 3305 SW 87�'Avenue
Portland, OR 97205 Portla.nd, OR 97225
OWNER: Lanphere Enterprises
Atm: Bob Lanphere
' 12520 SW Canyon Road
Beaverton,OR 97005
j�l
LOCATION: 10685 and 10655 SW Greenburg Road;WCTM�35BB,Tax Lots 00700 and 00800.
ZONING
DESIGNATION: MUC: Mixed Use Commercial District The MLJC zoning district includes land
atound the Washington Square Mall and land immediately west of Highway 217.
Pximary uses permitted include office buildings, retail, and seroice uses. Also
permitted are mixed-use developments and housing at densities of 50 units per acre.
Larger buildings are encoutaged in this area with parking under,behind or to the sides
of buildings.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18390, 18.520, 18.630, 18.775 and 18.790.
SECTION II. DECISION
Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Director has APPROVED the above request, subject to the
condition below. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section V.
NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION
SLR2006-10005-LANPHERE ENTERPRISES DRAINAGEWAY RELOCATION PAGE 1 OF 8
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHAI.L BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO PLUMBING PERMITS:
Contact the Current Planning Division (Emily Eng, (503) 718-2712) for review and approval:
1. The planner shall ensure that the plumbing perrnit submittals are consistent with approved plans for
this decision, SLR2006-10005.
THIS APPROVAL SHAI.L BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS
FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION
�
SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Site Information and Pro�osal Descri�tion:
The applicant is requesting approval to reroute a drainageway located at 10685 and 10655 SW Greenburg
Road (tax lots 00700 and 00800, respectively). The site is zoned M�ed Use Commercial and located in
the vicinity of the Washington Square Regional Center. The two tax lots are contiguous and commonly
owned. The applicant proposes to reroute the existing drainageway from the north property line of tax lot
800 to its west property line,where there is an e�cisting drainage ditch between the two tax lots,which have
a slope of about 1%. The proposed activity would involve: installing a 24" pipe into the existing ditch;
installing a concrete box culvert at the beginning of the existing ditch; replacing and extending a culvert
and installing a permeable rock berm at the end of the existing ditch; and removing one tree that is 7" in
diameter. The applicant also requests approval to remove the trees in the drainageway. The owner desires
to reroute the drai.nageway to use tax lots 700 and 800 as a single site in the future.
SECTION N. COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET
Staff received letters from two property owners:
Roger Belanich,who owns tax lots 201 and 202 south of the subject site (10763 and 10767 SW Greenburg
Road, respectively), wxote of his concem about how the proposed project would impact drainage on his
properties. Tax lot 202 is adjacent to tax lot 700 of the subject site and is the location of a 7-11
convenience store. Tax lot 201 is adjacent to tax lot 202 and is the location of a gas station. Both
properties have had a history of flooding during rain storms. Mr. Belanich stated two reasons for the
flooding. First, Fanno Creek backs up into Mr. Belanich's property, which is on a low grade. Second,
storm water from the subject site impacts the overall drainage problem. Mr. Belanich recommended that
proposed project include mitigation of the drainage problem in the area.
Res�onse: The project engineer modified the proposal to include on-site detention and a concrete box
culvert to minimi�e flooding and increase water flow capacity. A water flow capacity analysis shows that
the proposed modifications will increase water flow capacity. The modification and results of the water
flow capacity analysis are discussed in Section V of this report.
Joe Gisler owns tax lot 3300 (10585 SW Greenburg Road), direcdy north of the subject site. Ta.x lot 3300
is the location of the SafeGard Mini Storage. Mr. Gisler noted that the existing drainage ditch drains his
facility. He indicated that he supports the proposed project as long as it conforms to the plans he
provided (same as the plans that the applicant submitted to USACOE). He urged that the existing ditch
and culvert not be abandoned and notes that it also drains the Honda dealership and Office Max, north of
his property.
NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION
SLR2006-10005-LANPHERE ENTERPRISFS DRAINAGEWAY RELOCAT'ION PAGE 2 OF 8
Res�onse: The original plans have not changed, other than the addition of an on-site detention facility,
concrete box culvert and permeable xock berm. The applicant does not propose to abandon the existing
culvert, but rather replace it, and the existing ditch will be replaced by a facility that will continue to drain
Mr. Gisler's property.
SECTION V. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIQNS:
SENSITIVE LANDS
Section 18.775.020.F of the Tigard Community Development Code states: "The Director shall have
the authority to issue a sensitive lands permit in the following areas by means of a Type II
procedure, as governed in Section 18.390.040, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.775.070
(Sensitive Lands Pernuts):
a. Drainageways;
b. Slopes that are 25%or greater or unstable ground; and
c.Wetland areas which are not regulated by other local, state, or federal agencies and are designated
as significant wetlands on the City of Tigard"Wetland and Streams Comdors Map."
The applicant desires to xeroute a drainageway. Therefore, the applicant's request has been reviewed by
means of a Type II procedure.
DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES
Section 18.390.030.B.2 states that Type I application requirements shall include the following:
a. Information requested on the application form;
b. Responses to the relevant criteria in sufficient detail for review and action; and
c.The required fee.
The applicant has provided materials requested on the application form and the required fee. Responses to
relevant criteria are sufficient for review and action.
IMPACT STUDY
Section 18.390.040.B.2.e states: "The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on
public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system,
including bikeways, the drainage system, the pazks system, the water system, the sewer system, and
the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study
shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards and to minimiye the unpact of the
development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In
situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real properry
interests, the applicant shall either specificalty concur with the dedication requirements, or provide
evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly
proportional to the projected impacts of the development"
The applicant's proposal to reroute a drainageway would have no impact on the following systems:
transportation (including bikeways),parks, drinking water and sewer. Little noise impact is expected to result
from this projecL According to the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE), the project would affect .009
acres of waters of the United States. According to the City of Tigard Public Works Department, the project
would impact Fanno Creek, into which stormwater from the subject site drains. USACOE and Oregon
�� NOT'ICE OF TYPE II DECISION
�.. SLR200G-10005-I.ANPHERE ENT`ERPRISES DRAINAGEWAY RELOCATION PAGE 3 OF 8
.;.
r:..
�
Department of State Lands have authorized the project,which does not require a state removal-fill permit (see
page 5).
Although proposed project may unprove drainage on the site, it may have a negative impact on adjacent
properties,which have had a history of drainage problems because of the area's low grade and overflow from
Fanno Creek. The project engineer has modified original plans to include onsite detention and a concrete
box culvert, which will minimi7e itnpacts to neighboring properties and increa.se water flow capacity. The
project engineer has provided a water flow capacity analysis, which shows that the proposed concrete box
culvert has 2.5 times the capacity of the e�cisting ditch. T'he onsite detenrion facility will minimize flooding on
neighboring properties and a permeable zock berm at the outlet of the proposed culvert will TILn�m»e
stormwater runof£ �
MIXED USE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
The MUC zoning d.istrict includes land azound the Washington Square Mall and land immediately
west of Highway 217. Primary uses pernutted include office buildings, retail, and seivice uses. Also
permitted are mixed-use developments and housing at densities of 50 units per acre. Larger
build.ings are encouraged in this area with parldng under,behind or to the sides of buildings.
The site has been used fot light industrial purposes before it received the MUC zoning designation. No
changes to the use of the site or to its structures are proposed. The proposed activity does not require
compliance to the development standards of the MUC district for the purposes of this Sensitive Land
Review. Therefore,this criterion does not apply.
WASHINGTON SC?UARE REGIONAL CENTER
Section 18.630.030 (Pre-Existing Uses and Developments within the Washington Square Regional
Center Mixed Use Districts) states, "...Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 18.760.040, uses
prohibited and structures that would be nonconforming in any of the Regional Center Mixed Use
zoning districts that were lawfiilly in existence at the time of adoption of the Regional Center Mixed
Use districts are considered to be approved uses and sttuctutes. Howevet, future additions,
expansions, or enlargements to such uses or structures, shall be li.mited to the properry azea and use
lawfully in existence at the time of adoption of this ordinance,February 22,2002."
The applicant does not propose changes to the use of the site or its structures. Therefore, this criterion
does not apply for the purposes of this Sensitive Lands Review.
SENSITIVE LANDS PERMIT WITHIN A DRAINAGE WAY
Section 18.775.070.D states that the appropriate approval authority shall approve, approve with
conditions or deny an application tequest for a sensitive lands permit wittun drainageways based
upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied:
The extent and nature of the proposed land form alteration or development will not create site
disturbances to the extent greater than that required for the use.
The applicant desires to use two tax lots as one site, which requires rerouting the drainage way to be
located between the two lots. According to USACOE and State of Oregon Department of State Lands
(ODSL), the proposed activity would not disturb more than 50 cubic yards of material. Thexefore, the
proposed activity will not create site disturbances greater than required for the use. This criterion is met.
The proposed land form alteration or development will not result in erosion, stream
sedimentation, ground instability, or other adverse on-site and off-site effects or hazards to life or
ptoperty.
NOTICE OF TYI'E II DECISION
SLR2006-10005-LANPHERE ENTERPRISES DRAINAGEWAY RELOCATTON PAGE 4 OF 8
The applicant proposes to control erosion throughout the development process, as indicated on the site
plan and in an erosion control plan (see application file). In addition, the Building Department will
inspect the project axea for appropriate erosion control measures priox to issuing a plumbing pernzit.
Concerning off-site effects to neighboring properties, the project engineer has modified the proposal to
include a concrete box culvert and onsite detention to incxease water flow capacity and minimi�e flooding.
The project engineex has also modified the proposal to include a permeable rock berm at the oudet of the
proposed culvert will minim;7e stormwater runoff. Thexefore,this criterion is met.
The water flow capacity of the drainage way is not decreased.
The water flow capacity analysis shows that the proposed drainageway along with the concrete box culvert
will have 2.5 times the water flow capacity of the existing ditch. Therefore,this criterion is me�
Where natural vegetation has been removed due to land form alteration or development, the areas
not covered by structures or impetvious surfaces will be replanted to prevent erosion in
accotdance with Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening.
T'here are three trees in the existing dra.inage ditch, which will be removed. Two trees are less than 6
inches in diameter and one ttee is 7 inches in diameter. A tree removal permit is required fot the 7"-
diameter tree. The applicant has submitted an application for a tree removal permit, which has been
granted in this decision (see bottom of page 5 and page 6). The applicant proposes to fill the e�sting ditch
with concrete and gravel. A swale will be planted in the remaining impervious surface areas using erosion
control measures. Therefore,this criterion is met
The drainageway will be replaced by a public facility of adequate size to accommodate maximum
flow in accordance with the adopted 1981 Master Drainage Plan.
As shown in the watet flow capacity analysis, the drainageway will be replaced by a facility of adequate size
to accommodate the maximum flow. Therefore,this criterion is met
The necessary USACOE, ODSL and Clean Water Services (CWS) approvals shall be obtained.
USACOE has authorized the proposed project, as reflected in a letter dated December 16, 2005. ODSL
has authorized the proposed project, which does not requite a state removal-fill permit (see letter dated
October 26, 2005). CWS has approved the proposed project, as reflected in a letter dated September 19,
2005. Therefore,this criterion is met.
Where land form alterations and/or development are allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year
floodplain, the City shall require the consideration of dedication of sufficient open land area
within and adjacent to the floodplain in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. This are shall
include portions of a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedesuian/bicycle pathway
within the �oodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian bicycle pathway plan.
The subject properties are not located within the 100-year floodplain. There are also no wetlands on the
site. Therefore, this criterion does not apply.
TREE REMOVAL
Section 18.790.050.A states that tree removal permits shall be required only for the removal of any
tree which is located on or in a sensitive land area as defined by Chapter 18.775. The permit for
NOTTCE OF Tl'PE II DECISION
SLR2006-10005-LANPHERE ENTERPRISES DRAINAGEWAY RELOCATION PAGE 5 OF 8
removal of a tree shall be processed as a Type I procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.030,
using the following approval criteria:
Removal of the tree must not have a measurable negative impact on etosion, soil stability, flow of
surface waters or water quality as evidenced by an erosion control plan which precludes:
a. Deposits of mud, dirt, sediment or sunilar material exceeding 1/2 cubic foot in volume on
public or private streets, adjacent properry, or into the storm and surface water system, either by
direct deposit, dropping, discharge or as a result of the action of erosion;
b. Evidence of concentrated flows of water over bare soils; turbid or sediment-laden flows; or �
evidence of on-site erosion such as rivulets on bare soil slopes where the flow of water is not
filtered or captured on site using the techniques of Chapter 5 of the Washington County UniSed
Sewerage Agency Environmental Protection and Erosion Control rules.
The applicant has submitted an erosion/sedimentation conttol (ESC) plan that precludes the above. In
addition, the Building Department will inspect the project area for appropriate erosion control measures
prior to issuing a plumbing perinit. Considering there is one tree over 6 inches in diameter (out of thxee
trees total), the site is flat (about a 1% slope) and erosion control measures will be in place, inspected by
the City and maintained by the contractor, removal of the tree is not expected to have a measurable
negative itnpact on erosion, soil stability, flow of surface waters ox water quality. The ESC plan is
summarized below:
The ESC plan indicates that clearing limits shall be flagged prior to construction and no disturbance
beyond the flagged clearing limits shall be pernutted. T'he staging area will be protected by an erosion
control fence using stakes and filter fabric. The ESC facilities will be inspected daily by the contcactor and
maintained for proper functioning. The plan states that at no time shall more than one foot of sediment
be allowed to accumulate withi.n a trapped catch basin. Catch basins shall be cleaned prior to paving;
however, the cleaning operation shall not flush sediment-laden water downstream.
Therefore, this criterion is met.
SECTION VI. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS
The City of Tigard Public Works Department has xeviewed the proposal a.nd offered the following
comments, sutnmarized below:
Eric Hand, Wastewater and Storrnwater Supervisor in Public Works, wrote a memo expressing his
concerns related to the drainage problem in the area. First, Mr. Hand was concerned that installing the 24
inch pipe is not adequate to address the drainage problem and will reduce water flow capacity. Second, he
noted that while the proposed project is to install the 24 inch pipe, the applicant indicates future work
involving the rerouting of the existing 36 inch ODOT pipe south on the east side of t� lot 700. Third,
Mr. Hand noted that stortnwater from the subject site flows downstream into a wetland at 10770 SW
Cascade Avenue. This wetland, which is privately owned and not maintained by the City, is silted in
causing storm water to back up into the subject site in the winter. USACOE and DSL permits would be
required to perform any site woxk at the neighboring property. Mr. Hand made the following
recommendations:
1. The subject property owner should construct both parts of the project at the same time (install 24
inch pipe, as well as install 36 inch pipe with water qualitp facility along the south of tax lot 700)
2. The ownez should address the drainage problem on the 7-11 site.
3. City staff should conduct a downstream analysis regarding water flow capacity and impacts to the
NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION
SLR2006-10005-LANPHERE ENTERPRISES DRAINAGEWAY RELOCATTON PAGE 6 OF 8
downstream areas,including the wetland at 10770 SW Cascade Avenue before issuing an approval.
Res�onse: Because the e�cisting ditch and offsite wetland are on private property, the above
recommendations may be recommended but cannot be required as conditions of appro��a1 for this
decision. Staff conducted a site visit with the project engineer and the project engineer agreed to modify
the original proposal to mitigate off-site impacts. The modifications include the addition of a concrete box
culvert, onsite detention and a permeable rock berm, as discussed in this report. Per Public Works, the
proposed modifications are suitable.
SECTION VII. AGENCY COMMENTS
The US Army Corp of Engineers have reviewed the proposal and stated that the proposed project would
requ.ire its authorization.
Res�onse: The applicant has already received USACOE authorization in a lettex dated December 16,
2005.
SECTION VIII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATIDN
Notice: Notice was mailed to:
X The applicant and owners
X Owner of record within the required distance
X Affected government agencies
Final Decision:
THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON AUGUST 30,2006 AND BECOMES
EFFECTIVE ON SEPTEMBER 14, 2006 iTNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED.
A��eal:
The D'irector's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All pexsons entided to notice or who are
otherwise advexsely affected or a�n eved by the decision as provided in Section 18390.040.G.1. m�y appeal
this decision in accordance with�ection 18390.040.G2. of the T��gard Community Development Code wFuch
provides that a written appeal to�ether with the required fee shaIl be filed with the Director within ten (10)
business daps of the date t�ie Nottce of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available
from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,Oregon 97223.
Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be
confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the
comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be
submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any addirional rules of procedure that may be
adopted from t�tne to ume by the appellate body.
THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON SEPTEMBER 13, 2006.
NOTICE OF T'YPE II DECISION
�:
SLR200G-10005-LANPHERE ENTERPRISES DRAINAGEWAY RELOCATION PAGE 7 OF 8
uestions:
If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW
Hall Boulevard,Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171.
�
August 30,2006
REPA ' y Eng DATE
ssistant Planner
�
' '�" August 30.2006
APPROVED BY: Richard H. Bewe ff DATE
Planning Manage
NOTICE OF TYI'E II DECISION
SLR200G-10005-LANPHERE ENTERPRISES DRAINAGEWAY RELOCATION PAGE 8 OF 8
� • .
2
-o
��, �oc VICINITY MAP
�
$
�, ----------
° SLR2006-10005
0
LANPHERE
ENTERPRISES
� � DRAINAGE WA
g RELOCATION
� m
RS FERR
/
fC-pR� f� _—
s za -
— , � � •� �
� \`'
��-- L Qr .___ �ed�rt� D
—�' ea
g'F B�0.0 � 3
ADY
� Tgard Area Map
SO T J�C9 N
?�
��
SOR PL (9� o �oo soo 30o eoo 500 Fsel
� :�
1"=389 feal
�������� � .
>
Q
Infortnalion on this map�s for penersl bcation only and
� �hould be varified v.ith the Devalopmenl Senices Division.
� 13125 SW Hall 81M
Tiyard,OR 97223
(503)639-4177
• Attp:l/whnv.ci.ligaM.or.us
Community Development Plot date:May 24,2006;C:lmagicWIAGIC03.APR
CiTY QF TlGARD
Approved................-....._...........---------......_.._._.__........... t i
Condiiionally Approved....._...... ......._._...,,�/j
PERMIT N0. � � r��
LANPHERE ENTERPRISES see �etterto: Follow.........
..............�----- [ l
CULVERT REPLACEMENT Attacn...............___............_.._.....( ) �
�' S ILLLEN ,�" � � � � 10685 SW GREENBURG ROAI�yn aad�� � Q�
Date: b w om
t- + ` 4 � � L �'°�� TIGARD OREGON w °W�
_
� gv„ ; , ,�;.' , � 03�
�y oEMM � 4 �, J
y`�!r�T � � gH'MIA�NOMAH w ~�
� � s.. l� ,,i� �' - - J �,n°� ,
\. � y"�: �.'�'i�.A?!�f",1 � w��
� ° �� SITE LOCATION o SENSITIVE LAND REVIEW SUBMITrAL � m�F
swaRO Maw � ,,.F''.:: ,�.t;��.�s �
� '�,h! .� ��
G� nT �� �� ;:
� �.� •0*j ���°;�
° � GENERAL NOTES
" p CONSTRUCTION NOTES ���!
7 i-- r // �� �-'L __
y/ � �1 �-- ... � + 1. Nl 6LYAlq16 AR M�ql NI�i110Mm NIN1RARt WiW Af lq�l pi RAN �' ��pp��aMf.�iDMNX�OT�1!1[6OIO11���TK/1[MfA
�� YIQT.
f�� �p L STAlI01M0 Il�AYO l►dl KNR�IIIL UMLO O�Y XO7[0. ��Q1Mt AW 70[�NRi Y1IlL�[IIF1lAEm TO TiM OIIIOIAL �
i
� 3 NL COIIfTIIUCTp/NID WIOMK lINL C01✓pW 10 TQ'lIM MID lllL N'UC/Jli
����y � • IIEOUNOIOIIS OF TIE 1N1 qK0011 tlIM/G LMMd1Y H1NMi0 COD[NQ i awa�nc uo t�aa�uaoi�a�u�c cw�etm m��iwr W Of M
�" . �� � .-- MOUII1OIdif OI lll[OTY OF 110AI1G MUC YIIOKYWt GCfIW ft�WMOL WpM1Y 011Y Of1YITY M O[iL11111lILO�Y�flM D-�N.ROOMq M�ETMO M
�W,- - a�anum mawo rm w�m�n rar romttm. x�
� � a nc mwvurzo waT,uuna auu�a�wau ro�u�vn,c�su rmci tt�i[.�xo ��
wcK 000[s,arowu,as,wo uaunans wttuowo�r r[�w�+i Iwo a nus suu a ruao N�•-ix•�ao=vn uo car�cim m�o�r
NS9ECllp15 REIXIIRED!T TIE OOWtliWO�YMMI11fS OEMFIT Of Ai lI1VT Nfi OI ME YODIRF➢MOCTdI YAfOUM p1Y Op1Ytt
LOCATOR MAP 0. TIC CpITUCT011 fULL K 11FY011!!ll Idl COdIdNATMO ALL fLl[DWMO NID NL �'V�-1W)MTIM MNIDINO Nlp MTIIN f'OETM Of MIT MMI[NT RCTON �i
�rm tnc owtw. • wTM�ir�ur�rrM[ir�inc u�e[a�wa�oc ra�nc tmw un
a auv�ron wcr ear�r rd�u rnowan a aea�e�.ea�m�e�.m waunw
woirrwnw or ru rwmaT car�n a�uaars v uHOaa�oun un,m w a a�r�wT�mwar�umu�n ro outc�wrt�wr Knmi oa�»a
P M PI1pLCT MLA AT VA51 N M1tI1[p-OAY NOUI1{�NJT MOT YqK TINI 10 MKIOIT NID N[IY►��[1[Xt.
MISlESS DAYS,SO TUi fAD YlIl1M3 YAY K ACM�IELY LOCAT[p lRq1C
e caYltllGVw,wr OtcAV�nal �. COx1MCtM wwl nnw�T m�d�!Ad�d1F�s�0 M tlpW M,wAa[
� t'/c101
7. TIE LOCAIIpI R F�OS1N0 UIEQd1p1M0 UNIIO lND1�1 dl M KAM!R f011�
�I WIqWAIqM WlY MO M NDt QlMNII[m TO L COIMIlR dl�C�tI1�iL COMI�AC1a i. AGYff NL NiLdiK i1RIC1UCR WW10.L WL VALK qSL[1C 10
C SWLLi 4E1tl�Y CIFV�iqMt ti[1S Nq YAIWAL 11K p ALL UMOItlIdkD U1rl1[S IMlm a1ML
O �f PR1011 10 C0111pI010�1111 COMSIIlUC110N MIC 9U11 NIMO M11 OISGVAl1I'1[i RI 111[
� U 7. �T1EM1pN Of IlOMNO SQL1WwL I1 MOlMS PI11011 10 ETMT OI C0IILPIUCIKML • IM1GIlllt.T�OOI[KGV�TIDI,�P[L1111lr M0 MOIfILL O�V�Tp4
LW1
2 ' ��i�r •�, .
4 M DIONE01 q1 Or1O11�NOT 11O►OIaML/ql TI[SV[lY 01 M[OOMT1ACld1 tll f M CMfMCTV YMLL MOVI➢[ALL MTQlIKS MN Uq!10 ORITE
� NS p1EW.Nl 0.SNA.MAMTOMf OWl�[i11CC�11'M11OIm 10 M M M VOtl(f71 M iTdM IEVG�T TNC LOGTI�IS,SI=[S MIO TFP[S K tl �
� _��'~� . ��._. ' ����� 6 pq�q�yµ�q M NdUL LOVM OI M RM1i. lTWI KVERi SINLL K L�l➢IN Tltll[ALIWENT IN 4
A➢�T MK TK�CM•�CDECV TO TK CCT�II AS SMVM b1 llC PLM15.PIK y
� �• : . . . : . . - Y. 1E�PqIMI'AIO lOWMl�If OIOiW COM111Q YGiMlllfl WKL R U�D At MaDm. 1AFIMG LMLI KGIM�T T14 LOV rOIMT R TIIE iISiEM NN�R�CEED � � �
� � nc owm�cra M�u id�ac m an a na�q�u wcrmw�r ra aawi VQ�/�O[VITM Dlf�i dDt PpINTIMG VGN�R.
� �- . . �r�_, �' cama��waa. u.rarvwn w�a�x a.vs�rvc wm rmvrs sw��cosoaw ro�srM �
� � 10.M WN111ACT011 0 II[lOIIYI[Ipl WWTAMq ALL IIG1DMYt RO�NO 1MD1 pfAN 0]UN i0R A.T1E JOINTi i1NLL l[RL)fIM.0 vITM ELGiT�IEp(C SCKS
p MO/IIQ d COMlIIlUC1pN WIOW4l NO OFM4.ANC MIOWINO MECptMY OU�7 �M116 TO IJTN F]!1[NI�ASTM��]].CMT�ACTOR LMLL'YOVIOE
Ty .��. 10. ��»��p��. fR IIIGi�K��=�CG/111Gi CdM�TpLE V1TM IEV Nlp CXItTWG
> �, �'� - 11.VOIIE l�Git!)10 MII�IlqUO[IIIRJN�l�0101�1A CQI1MC1011 10 w/Mr I/10
p �h . �7-^ _ 11. �[CtlID Y[A14MIObllf d OUCT IOCAMI YD OVM It OIETi TQLO K C�QTACT[0 DI M lS�T104.6iV�T1OR NO C
u +
� � I � - 11 NL�[IWif NO UCOIIq 1l�NP/1011 M OlO7IqM NC OOINt11GM 0��0101 OOKNlIW!�t SIWN DI�K RMY.Ll[Tf fIMLI�E fET KW TO�OE
.J � I ..�.._ 1i 9W1![XCIM[D tY M Cp11MCiq1�R01110 COY[NOIO CpQIRIC7IOL IMNQE�f�NC NIO COV[Ri tIMLLC�fUlT�, '�ml 1EMWG MSE
U � �� �A!OM[WM[NL7�0 M WfIMCipI�NLL Mpin'NL�pl�OlT f�ECPiC0.
/ � COIR�Itt pl AOUIG[f I�M�q�AO Y1Nli[7 M M FlIQlLi M[A f0 111AT
0 11 !Ap YR111E7 Wt�L M.L1/IARY LOC�I[D. IL l�[NCM f0lIMTm1 LML�Y f}uV�10/0 WRI�[qp�R/q
'D � j" 116PCLT[D�T GEOTEWUML 04bLEIL P�ITIDIt II[9U1�pDYRIDIML
� 11.M LOG110N GI Om1MY 1M001�411D VRIIIO lIqMN pl iK�UMf I�Iq1 iUq1AD[M[►IiMTld1 INV K 11[iJl�[0 Ulm[l�T[tlMVL[NGb1E[II.
t MFptll�Npl plLr NO 6 MDT OUMAN7[m 10 K ACpIIIAI[. MT10li Ml GIIWIMYt
[
C Y-. � - 1�. AS NELL9M1'lEFp1E 0011�11111CiqM TO MKWIi OIIAO[Nq NIONM!!1T WNH1C7[
O . 10.COMTIAC7011 MNL�W/V GfVAiIOM 0/NL UIGdY1pN1U IlTIIKf Apll 10
- � _1' CAMIIENQNO INTI C011l1�UCMMI ND 1NNL MIINO�M1'DIlCIIfIANCIU 10 TI[�Ti[NiqM
O `�� . . ' I � ^�� l 10. OI iLOMINO lOLUllp18. 8
Q 1 . .'. .� ` .✓'J�l 1!. �!.n0.U5T ML IMpOEMTK ftM/CtUtfl.MNIIIOIL 1104 VNK Wl�,[TG TO OIIAOL e
Y " 1.� " ��9�A n.cwacrz auu x ne�nr-�i■rxc cwo�wNa ro nrt Niw aw n�cam�cia �
SMKI��SS1uE 1ME 11ESPM4YJtt Fql Wlt D[fION�MD AOOUCT'QIIIpIINC[.11�
t . I . / _ YIMYW COMPIIES44F lIRFMGM fdll 7M[N7Y-Otlli(T/1 W/7 lINL�E 7�000 MUMO�
6 _ � ( . - PER Sp1ME MOI.fAMtR[t[WALL�[PU6D N COYPLIAMfL MM M�C11C0 NA
� � i� 11. IIECd�MdU�1H)NS OF TIE AMf/MLIJ1 CaxqER IqTNIL
� 1l PIII011 TO PufridT of Gn1uUED 4MR TK OafIWO�IIANi�1NLL R QfANm.TR
� fPm((Y 11E9N BorvOMq�GfHT WALL![�WU[D TC 11E NLL NOM OI M OOIITACT
.�. Il AIIrKl W SiMCT fAYq1WMCl M1N TI[YNMJIACNIl017 M11XlCllQli
'Q V I C I N I TY MAP �R 1�. M��ypT� 10 ORAE A�IIIT AMT R7Y�1 M ONiNO M�OLMT
q 10.M WIIIN�CI011 I�IYlWMf Ipl EOIp1110N 0/O0fiN0 AG,QM►�(MIWfR
� Nq OTEl1 Y7[6!L[Alt I�TM M MIOJ[CT MI[A K
p i
/
ii 9
_ .—,—._�.. _ �_- � N e cL
,._.....,,-•.,-.-�_ . _
� i j� --<—�=—
i :
i , a
t� , �� � � w �
e—o---r r r'°'' 1� ' � a m
� � zw
t� � W 2��
( W
SW CASCADE AVENU � ADJACENT � w �N�
Y � LOT NOT IN 1 � Q�Q
� � WORK AREA � cn m�F
� >
( �
j ��g�
; ��° �6
EXISTING 1 �"g
BUILDING � - '� ' :�
APPR�X 30,OOOSF ` � / r
___— , i•ri ` _ �
..
_ ------.�,
y•• `---.._,., ,..,._�--.r�?—�•--'�
n� - . _ ._...._. _...-;�':�:�.3�.����. . .
EXISTING A/C y � _ ��
N❑ CHANGES � �1
PR�P�SED
AREA=45,OOOSF �
;
a � �
g --•—
` Z I �
� �
� c�z �
� � � ¢ �
� � ' � } � �
o j
o �
CULVERT �Q
r REPLACEMENT D �
� Y� z� ! c
o ARE �Z �
� � � �
� 1
o ;
L W❑RK AREA SUBJECT T❑ ,� � I
� SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW ,!:� {
aIMPACT AREA=2500 � `� � Z� � � �
y .5 x
� �,Z _
o � �. ��
o CONSTRUCTI� 11� t I �� � AD➢ITIONAL SITE AREAS
y STAGING AREA , ; I n� NOT SH�wN, N❑ WORK
� ACORDING T� "' _ =Z � PR�P�SED�
� APPR❑VED EROSI❑N -_ _ �ao _ � L�T TO EAST= 89,70oSF
.,:_ '�_
. � C❑NTR�L PLAN ny ,_ ,_._.1- '
� �� EXISTING BUILDING= 17,735SF �
� m� _ �� . Y
d, y
Y
� �b�
� I� J� o
' r ; EXISTING BUILDIN �
. r c�
�' , °- � �
_
i om
� � ff.7 � Xuu Z O W O
� 2�w
XISTING SCALE VAUL ; � �3�
� XISTING �UTFALLT❑ W ��^o
I N:4723.0790 PR❑PERTY � Q�<
�
II CULVERTS 10007P.K180 Z � x�, x� �� cn m�F
I� / :.� ° �
'� ,,.a 0 � V xm.. x„e, �, � �„u
���... ^' : Xmu
' : ��ECT P❑LE� '`� �' ' . j
� A/C Z � l��s
�I � °
,� N '
—__ __ .. �
�� ____
»,�-- ---- -------
,,, �,� . _, � �_ ._ -
-- W �r�e
I --_.._ Xe .. v7
� � .... __ x . .. , .._._.. _. �
--- .._..___'--.-
� _
� � --._'- - X -.__ XKt ��.._-'-'...____ (n
... ._�._.._.__.
' ' . '_"___ �(N�7 �"'._.""_.'..._.�-_._�.
' . '_ .'_... fff
.... \ •' ._'_'___' �
�-._._._._ XfY ... _'_"_' 7
.. __.._.__.... . "
� � ..._.. � x � X7L7 . XMl'_- .
�
EXISTING DITC 'HAIN– NK ��1�
0 20
9 SENSITIVE LAND REVIEW AREA PLAN VIEW TREE Scole.• 1"= 20'
,� CWORK LIMIT LINE)
4
�
0
V
2
N
� � �
C � � �
a
o �
<
w CrossSectlon-1 CrossSectlon-2
0 120,0 120,0 120.0 120.0 c
n
/
j 11�,� 110�0 110�0 11�.�
v° , 1 .5' _1 4'.
c
0
0 100,0 100.0 100,0 � . _ 100.0
m �'' H W - �
� 90,0 N 90.0 90.0 HW 90,0
m
d
L p
p 0�,0 80�� B�iO 8���
U
.�
� SECTION 1 SECTION 2 ;
%
: q
�
B�X CULVERT END, PR❑VIDE GRAT � � �eK
xJ.�', IE=+/-97,5 �
� � „,, C❑NTRACTOR i x� i
` ; y T❑ FIELD VERIF��' i �
'� DITCH INLET ; �
� AFTER EXCAVAT �N �
�; ;
�� i �� SAW CUT A/C N�4723.0790 N SEE SHEET ' � ZZ
�� B❑TH SIDES :�000�.aieo , IE=+/— 99.5 , w o��
I (� _��'
�, ! ! POINT: PK � "� xm{ xue.a i O �c��
"'; ,,, � � """ C❑NNECT SC LE DRAIN x�. X„�, d ��
: v REM❑VE E�ISTING I'w EW CU VERT ��` � i / "" � ��a
DUCTILE CULVERTS '�' '°" �' Z � Wo'�
N 90 LF 3X6 B�X�CULVERT °x,K, �,• � m--F
, ����- �
� -- �----�_— __ S=0A069 APPROX, ""'�----
... ---�_ I ..W
. _—�-._--�,-x� v,
_,� ------
,r ,. "
J � _ _ , � ��
--- - __--_ ' ��6
� -- - -- I �e
c-- _�--T__—�- -- — �i' �
--' �_
DEFLECT B❑X REMOVE / � — ___— � I
CULVERT BUSH/TREE / ACCESS MANH�LES .�__ . ���
AS REQUIRED L C�NCRETE FIELD 100LF SEPARATI❑N � _� ��
RIP—RAP ❑UTFALL INLET, CONNECT D 20 40 60 �
CLASS 2 ❑DOT WITH 4" 3034 PIPE REM❑VE TREES
3 TYPICAL ■
REMOVE/REL❑CATE Scale.� 1"= 20' ��,1
EXISTING FENCE
; PLAN VIEW
a
�
Q
c
0
� � � � �
o �
o �
0
C
`o CrossSectlon-2
`; CrossSectlon-1 120.0 120,0 c
0
a 120�0 120�0
i
� A —GR VEL iio,o 1io.o
D iio,o iio,o _�_ a'_.
o � i 5
� I ioo,o ioo,o
° ioo.o ioo.o 0
� �—_ HW N . HW �
a cv 90;0 90.0
� 90.o so.o P OP� ED
t P OP� ED C LV RT
= C LV RT Bo,o 80,0
� ao.o eo.o
q
.�
� SECTION 1 SECTION 2 k
, a .
> �
�.
cR��n � �b�C
— _ DOST.A.0.... 6' DE7EC7ABLE WARNMC TAPE
� � - p
�
4lET FlIA1E
k URATNO .... �,�.� ____ U
�
BO%SACNi1LL �' - ,j•' O05T.AC. a m
' :• �Z
' r. Jlt.e a oo�re eox axvenr p W�j
BEDdNO.."' ` _'• . = Cg
__---- —_—_ e yq� ,m � Z�W
CM15HE�ROqf
RIN� - ... . 3ppp pg i...._, 3'-MMIUS — ���
ADJACENT A/C .....� i CONCFE7E ' .. W •
� EMlANKMQ/T , .._.... � FWNDATION Q K Q
' � ,-FWISH OEOIE%TLE "''. .• �ROQ(ER ~ >a�0�
`�, � AMFACE (AS-REWIRED `. 6. ' W w �
. ..._._. ._s.w _:. .T_
O1Ep1
� . -�- � �..� F
BY OEOlEq1 �
' f t 4 '- x .�{�• � MIN. MIN. WSPECTqI m^
...�I I ' . \'. I.',. -� �- ��
t..
12' ..7..'.'k.:.:� �.','�:-.:�...���' .�'i�,;.,.. ,��_r NCff.i
MIN_^. • t. 12'��KMENT SEClld/-{'AC D�ER!'COMPACIF➢ORAI�EL
� �� t #��66
> �,�-- �.�' !�»� '�, � BOX BEDDING & BACKFILL �j�6 I
_ 'r s �� tNF�! I
. ;...
� �� ";:
n� � ::<: , ',.:''" -.���_ _ ;, �
e� J �
A�
�wre+ e•I an I e' �
e. r �
{ �iq/NDA71M�� �� I� ��� � 1
� r
o, NO7ES^. .
3 1. CONIRACTOR TO MIDd E%CAVATIdI AS REOUIRED TO OBTAXI CpPAC71011
a WM CONiRACTqtS COWACTpi EWIPYDI7.
g z DITCH INLET �° Hanson
'� 5 ,, �rnrn n�.�r��wrr
2 • ne�e av iim��wnK
e � n ulN)wsv�
�
� � � i
v 4,�T � �
`o i
L
C
r SHEET NOTES: Q'x 3'BOX CULVERT
>
� PIPE SHALL BE H-25 RATED BOX CULVERT BY HANSON PIPE m�aat A �
i
� MANHOLE ACCESS TO BOX CULVERT SHALL BE PROVIDED EVERY 100 FT °°
� FOR ACCESS AND CLEANING. �
a ��'��
c � i� t2' 7'
o TEMPORARY FIELD INLETS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR GRAVEL PARKING
DRAINAGE.
Y �
o q
i � � '^
y 4.5'BELL �
u
r
a
c
a � � $[�TION A
/
u
•x MANHOLE ACCESS POINTS NOT SHOWN
0
n
� � BOX CULVERT H-25 LOAD ;
s •
i �
i+
EROSION CONTROL PLAN NOTES WATER BYPASS RECOMENDATIONS � �e�
i ATTAqI ALRR
1. 1yp�Ip/IiL K MS FR09p1/�MENT�110N OONiR0.(CiG)'IAM GOFE MOT �ABMIC TO STAKES L COpiXACT011 IS RCSP0115I�LE i�DEVttOP A DlTpl tYP�S!STRATCGY
NIC IRCLEMi TO FK.IKER fOR MPR�VN.. J
COp6T1111F IH APPROVIL Oi PERYNIFlIi RDM d1 M�IMAOE OEY4M(EQ,1II ND A /iCCEPTAKE IETNOOT IMCLIIOE,EITHEN PIWING pl fR�VIT�IIOV O O
.Z.�,,.��P�T� ICTM002.T[INdInTY�EXMS/LiRULiW[S K1Y�E F[WIA[0. �
LOGIIIW d ROA05,RESINICTORS,CM�lMtL;II[7UI1MM1 FAtlllllC;NllJlig EiC.} y �Y-P�SS SINLL 1[S12[0 f011 T1'PICK SUMIFA fLWL (�
2 M MlfltllTAM1N R 11[SC ESL PIANY N1C M OOIBiq1CTdL YNMi[MNQ. FLIER fABNIC\ � S1EEL fENCE POST C. IN t11C GSE�'�LNIGC RNN[VCNT CWTM�CTOR IMY l[ROUIKD L a'
M ! TO�LM VpIK MtE�KTCII[VQ/T►AiSEf TD Gd1/WL VptlL
IIfYIACDIflIL AND UItlVi0W0 Of 111ESE ESC fACL71E5 K T1E IIFSP0119M1TV 01 �
nIF CaNnV�CTaII IMM NL Caxsntutnan is roMREIFD AMU MMMSD ANC BACNi111- , AS REGUWEU��a !.�DDlTIW�I iGMWt7o1 NGCK TO iTqRIiE lOWM71M N1C�IN TNE Z �m
PFIIYNiENi KOCTAIIM/lAWSLAPM10 IS EST�IW�O. �� \ � � �� CFSE�NIGN V�TCM IL TIK Kffq/fI�0.1T�a TI[CplfMCia. O Z��
S M BdIimANES Oi M ClFMwO lM�la 9qMM ON Ms NNI 11ALL![p[NILY l �
MOGFD M TIC I1RD PIIqN iO Cp�SIIXKTOH.p1N10 TIE CON{111UCT011 P[ItlOD. � � "�C70ST.O�OINM1 U S a.C7
MO qSTMIBNIC[lEYOMD TE MOf1D C1IMtlq W16 i1N1!E Pf11YTIED.T[ , / TO STAKES Z V. w
CGNS111UCTOM. OE 1UNTNIfD!T M[CON1MClOR PoII T[WR�1101 V ,+ Z 3�
{. 1N[L9C fila/Ki i101N dl M!'lNl IU�T R COMfTNt1lD M fANMICTpI O�n �{��
WM NL aL�MMG N1D GIIApq AC1M1[S.NO M MIW�YNlM11 AS 10 fNAlK 1 � v! >�a'
MAl![G�dIT MO 5[DIY[NT IA001 M101 00 MOT dIG M ORMIAQ iYSTFM. � I Q�a
110MMYS hc MOL�i[MRJCNIL MRII STAMM106 O W�U'
6 M FfC IA011lS 9qY11 OM MS NN1 M[M WMN IIEGINIEIlMl9 F011 6�YNI. I I E'4AX I �' m�F
NIIYIAI[D 91[COOIIWS pJIMO AIE WNSIRULTp1 POIqO.TIESE ESC
f/iOIKE 71WL�[1/PIAOm A41E[D(D ICII UILW[tl[D STOIW EYFNR NO 10 � � W
p19111E MI�T m�ENT A/O l�IM7 W[N Y�l[11 DD NOT lUK iNE AlE SID[ VJ�( [[;QriT VIEW
a na oc r�m swi�t�stcieo oKr�r nc ca1m�cro�wo��wr�wco
�s ams�nr ro owac na�own�+n nMCnaww Noics:
1. �ry[SC/AQJI[i 011�MCTY[91[f MNL R M4LCRD A/D YAMTIIMD A 1.IHSTALLAMNI 91ALL i'OLLON'TE YAM►AC7lMGS ��
a wcc�ror'm ol1 wmM n�E a�HaMa rauowa�sm�r cwii 11ECaMYENDATaNi ���0
• �T 10 lYC 9W1 Y011[TINI 01!IOOT Of�D�OIf!ALLOY�10 ACCIMM►AlE �
■TM�111MHD C�TOI lA91L NL CA1W�A1N!AMD CONKY�MfE t1LS lINL 2 i1LTEl1 FAMIC-USE MMMlM1 Of]!'NID[110LLS
!E 0.ENIED MWR TO PANN6 TIE qlAMq 0'pAlld W�11 NOT RLW ZD�ENT
EN , SEDIMENT FENCE ��'
lAOO�w�lu wm m[oo11r1611YAr mm.
0. lTMU2ED WN5711UC710N lNTIANC[i lUll R NSTAIIlD�T TI[KOIIIMNO V ..
CONSn1UC11aN/J1D YNIiANfD I011 M WRAlION p T1L PIIQECT.MpTONAL s
YEA4URES WY BE IIEpIINm TO EN5M1[iNAT ALL i�MC M[A!Mf K[PT CIfAM
idl iME DUR�TW OF T1F PIQECT. �
�
Pl�4N VIEW �'��1
�� � �
, ,
�� I XIW '
o, 1 I I !
3 � . �
° 1 1 I
�
°° �1.' i BYPASS i
4 �. ;�.
r ; a� CHECK STRUCTU1��23.o�eo ' '
� �
i;� a000�.aieo ! !
� � : PK 101 xweo X�' y � �
eu �•'� �[ I 4 {�
� - . �� � . ���... X�w X�oes i � ��
xwu
a �' � WATER BYPASS �" � � �
o ;I , , `�.._. �B
-- YPAS
� - '... :
� �. ''�c�, ---x,,, .—� r�,.•�„�-___-- _ DESIGN CK—�TR E ,
� _. ,� , ' � -______
�_
.__._-
- -- x,.� ----
� ---
v � __ � ----- ,00 _.._.
� —---
X�a ---
___---
__._-- TM� __._
j �/ � -�-�--'-�-�- � X1FS � � -,_.
• --._.___. �_._.�\
_...- -.__... _
�o . _..__.--..._. lQp ...
� X�au � —_X�'J-_���_: r.--.w . ..
0
LC 7(_.�--'s
O �.
g 0 20 4
i �
o STAGING AREA
� PR�TECTED BY Scale: 1"= 20'
� ER�SI❑N FENCE
�
�
.�
a
n
w d
� i I
/
4
0
I
1�
�
RE QUE ST FOR C�MMENTS
DATE: Ma�24,2006
TO: Rob Mur�chison,Public Works Project Engineer
FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division
STAFF CONTACT: EmilvEng,Assistant Planner(x27121
Phone: (503� 639-4171 Fax: (503) 624-3681 Email: EII11I tigard-or.gov
SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW(SLR) 2006-10005/TREE REMOVAL PERMIT (TRE) 2006-00010
➢ LANPHERE ENTERPRISES DR.AINAGE WAY RELOCATION Q
RE�UEST: The applicant is requesting Sensitive Lands Review approval to reroute a drainage way. The proposed
activity would also involve replacuig and extending a culvert. The site includes two t� lots, which are commonly
owned. The applicant proposes to move the existing drainage way, which currently separates tax lots 00700 and
00800, to the east property line of ta�c lot 00800. The owner desires to reroute the drainage way to imp rove water
conveyance and use the two tax lots as a single site. A tree removal pernut is requ� i�red to remove a 7" cal�per tree in
the draina� ge way. LOCATION: 10685 and 10655 SW Greenbur� Road; WCl'M 1S35BB, Tax Lots 00700 and
00800. ZONE: MUC: Mixed Use Commercial District. The IV�JC zoning district includes land around the
Washington Square and lan unme iate y west o I�ig way 217. Primary uses pernutted.include office buildings,
retail, and service uses. ALso perniitted are m�ced-use developments and housing� at densities of 50 units per acre.
Larger buildin�gs are encourage�d m th�s area with parkin under, behind or to the sides of building s. APPLrCABLE
REVIEW CRITERIA: The approval standards �or Sensitive Lands Review are described in Communiry
Development Code Chapters 18390 (Decision-Making Procedures�, 18.510 (Commercial Zoning Districts}, 18.630
ashin on S uare Re ional Center , 18.775 Sensitrve Lands ,and 18.790 ree Removal .
Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map andAp plicant's Statement/Plans for your review. From inforn�ation supplied
byvarious departments and a encies and from other uiforn�aaon available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be
prepared and a decision will �e rendered on the proposal in the near future. If yc>u wish to comment on this application,
WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: UNE 07 2006. You may use the space provided below or attach a
separate etter to return your comments. I, u are una e to res ond b the above date, please phone the staff contact
noted above withyour comments and co u�myt�u�r� comments in writin as soon as possible. If you have any questions,
contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,T"igard,� 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
_ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. ,�
Please contact � of our office.
� Please refer to the enclose etter. �� i,���,� - �� ,� ���'� �
Wntten comments provided below:
.,�
,
I Name &Num er o Person(s) Commenting: I •;
Y,
iT.�
I
?� - - .
2 � _
-o
��, �ocu VICINITY MAP
�
� ----------
p ----------
° SLR2006-10005
�a
LANPHERE
ENTERPRISES
� � DRAINAGE WA
D RELOCATION
v
m
� �
� ��
1�UF5 FERR
0.� �c�aa �� l,
s % z i ��_�
SG�` / P1� -
r
'� ��,--
B Q� �BONRA D
i�B�� _OUR.11/Jir 1RU
ADY �
Tigard Area Mep
)SO T J�C9 N
2�
�
�SOR PL ��� o ioo zoo soo aoo soo Feet
1"=389 feet
�������e = ,
w
>
Q
.
Information on Ihis map is for general location only and
o shwld be verified uith the Development Services Division.
° 73125 SW Hall Blvd
' '� � Tigard,OR 97223
(503)639-4771
http:lMww.ci.tigard.or.us
Ccrmmunity Development Plot date:May 24,2006;C:UnagicUTAAGIC03.APR
, � .
��
= MEMORANDUM
� � �
TO: Emily Eng, Assistant Planner
� �
FROM: Eric Hand,WW/STM Supervisor ���i
RE: Lanphere Enterprises Drainage Way Relocation (C ile No.
SLR2006-10005) ����33NIJN3/JNINNt/ld
ad`dJll�O Jlll�
DATE: 6/7/06 9ooz s o Nnr
Emily, I have reviewed the proposed project and have serious concerns. a��l���a
This site at 10685 Greenburg Rd. and the neighboring properties have a history of flooding
problems. Every winter storm waters overflow the existing ditch and floods the area. See
attached map.
It appears to me there are two parts of this project;
1. Install a 24" pipe in the existing ditch between 10685 & 10655 SW Greenburg Rd.
2. Reroute the existing 36" ODOT pipe south on the east side of 10655 SW Greenburg
Rd. and then west through a new "public" storm water qualiry faciliry to be installed
along the south edge of the property.
My concerns are:
1. Both parts of the project must to be constructed at the same time. It is not clear that
the 36" pipe & water qualiry facility will be constructed at the same time as the 24"
pipe is installed in the existing ditch.
2. The strip mall where 7/11 is located is the low point in the area and has serious
flooding problems. Can this issue be addressed as part of this project?
3. This project may just move the current flooding issue downstream. The storm water
from the project area flows downstream to a wedand located at 10770 SW Cascade
Ave. This wedand is silted in causing storm water to back up into the project area in
the winter. The wedand is private property and not maintained by the Ciry. A
Corps/DSL permit would be required to perform any work there.
� f �
My recommendation is to have our own downstream analysis done. We must review this
project very very thoroughly before anything is approved.
Please contact me if you have any additional questions at x26U7.
�
. ,
_ t � /
_T ,
50 5
D',
�
�� 22i� .,
�'
18
l05 85 21 \`
Gre��u�� .��
� 19
17 �J
,t"X�S���i�r ,t-x�s�;� �S �4L �
� ��" ���� DOD '
�.lpOG�/.�
2 , �
x� �- { �� �
r�, ��r
g -c' Gre,u, •�P
�
Q �
1 �
- 40 � pVT CB LINE 7
STATE
41 �
� ��;��_
4 � `�� �j S ATE �..,..
42 s`�"�.,r�
� 39
�
44 45 g 4
47 ; 8 9
4 � 32
34t 35t 36t 33 37t
- � 11 f 12
5 �
3t
�T /.,� ------- r
• Roger M. Belanich
B��n���� ��o�Q��� DQVQIIo�m�����
22020 -17th Ave. S.E., Suite 200, Bothell,Washington 98021 (425)485-4850 or (206)623-6230 FAX (425)483-181 I
June 1, ZOO6 RECEIVED
JUN 0 2 2006
Emily Eng, Assistant Planner CITY OF TIGARD
Planning Division PLANNING/ENGINEERING
City of Tigard
13125 SW Hall Boulevard
Tigard, Oregon 97223
RE: Applicable Review Criteria
Sensitive Lands Review (SLR) 2006-10005
Tree Removal Permit (TRE) 2006-00010
I am the owner of the following two tax lots with the addresses o£
R 1346476 10767 SW Greenburg Road
R 1346485 10763 SW Greenburg Road
The property is located adjacent to Greenburg Road and Frontage Road (see attached
map) directly south of the Applicant's property.
There is an open storm water drain along Frontage Road that drains into the storm
drainage system along the north section of my property. The storm water then continues
into an open ditch near the NW corner of my property and that ditch drains into Fanno
Creek (see site plan attached). The Applicant's property also drains into this same
drainage ditch.
There is a history of the subject property flooding during a rain storm. There are two
apparent reasons that cause the flood. One is that Fanno Creek backs up into my subject
property which is at the end of the above described ditch and the low property in the area.
The other is pertinent to the planned subject development because water from that
property impacts the drainage problem. We request that the subject development
mitigate these problems as a condition of approval.
Please investigate these two issues for a satisfactory solution and please send us a Staff
Report.
Very trul s,
r
Roger M. Belanich
�
. ,
� NO�TICE TO MORTGAC�E,LIENHOLDER,VENDpR OR SELLER '�" "'� �� _—�--_�
T�3E TTGARD DEVEIAPMENT QODE REQLJIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE'1�-IIS Np'IICE,17'SHA7 i B
THE PURCI�ASER . FORWARDED TC
� �
NOTICE OF PENDING
LAND USE APPLICATION �
=
SE NSITIVE LANDS RE VIE W
� �,,
DATE OF NOTICE: May 24,2006 �� G !//�
U�� � �x�l
FILE NUMBERS: SENSITIVE LANDS RE VIE W SLR 2006-10005 �(� ��c� �
TREE REMOVAL PERMIT �TRE 2006-00010
�
FILE TITLE: LANPHE RE E NTE RPRISE S DR.AINAGE WAY RE L TIQN
PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Sensitive Lands Review approval to reroute e
proposed activity would also uivolve replacing and extending a culvert. The site mc u eS��lo�e
which are commonly owned. The ap licant proposes to move the exist�n� '
curnently separates ta�� lots 00700 and �0800, to the east property line of tax I t 0080 Y' �ch
desires to reroute the drainage way to improve w�ate»conveyance and use the � �a��ee
site. A tree removal permit�s requu-ed to remove a 7 caliper tree in��ge�y '�
LOC.ATION: 10685 and 10655 SW Greenburg Road;WCTM 1S35BB,Tax Lots 00700 and 00800. �
�cP�7`i�c
ZONE: MLJG Mlxe Use Commercial District. The MUC zoning district includes land around the
vciashington Square Mall and 'unme ' tely west of Highway 217. Primary uses per�tted include
office buil�s, retail, and service uses. Also permitted are mixed-use developments and housin� at
densities of 5 units per acre. Larger buildings are encouraged in this area with parl�ng ur�der, behind
or to the sides of bu.�ldings.
APPLICABLE
RE VIE W
CRITERIA: The approval standards for Sensitive Lands Review are described in CommunityDevelop�nt�e
C�apters 18.390 (Decision-Making Procedures , 18.510 (Commercial Zo ' Districts), 1g.630
(Washington Square Regional Center), 18.775 �Sensitive Lands),and 18J90 ree Remov
�
YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN MMElv'I' ;
Pnor to the Qty making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) dayperiod to submit written
comments on the apphcation to the Gty. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIpD ENDS AT
5:00 PM ON JUNE 71'H 2O06 . All commenu should be directed to�Eng Assistant Planner in the P
Cityof T'igard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,T'igar�d,pregon 97223. You mayreach the Cityof T'igard bytelephone at 503) 718-2712.e
ALL COMMENTS MUS? BE RECEIVED BY THE QTY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE
SPEQFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DEQSION-MAKING pRp�SS
THE QTY OF TTGARD APPREQATES REC�IVING COMIvIENTS AN� VAL,UES YOUR INPLTT. pplvIl�,�� ��
BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN T�-� Np'ITC� p� DEQSION. A DEQSION ON Tf-IIS ISSUE IS
TENTA7TVELY SCHEDULED FOR jUNE 19. 2006. IF YOU PROVIDE CO1VIIv�NTS,ypU WILL,BE SENT A CpPY OF
T�IE FULL DEQSION ONC� IT HAS BEEN RENDERED.
WRITTEN COMr�NTS WILL BECOME A PART OF 'TI� PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHAI,I, OONTAIN
'IT� FOLLOWING INFORMATTON:
f •
♦ Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" descxibed in the section above or any other criteria believed to
� be applicable to this proposal;
♦ Raise anp issues and/oz concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a
�esponse;
♦ Comtnents that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigatd Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval
critetia with sufficient specificity on that issue.
Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificiry may preclude subsequent
appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific fi.ndings d.irected at the
relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence.
1�FIER T'�� 14 DAY COr�NT PERIOD CLOSES,THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTR.ATTVE DECISION. T�-�
DIREC'I'OR'S DECISION SHAI.L BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED
WITf-IIN 5O0 FEET OF TfiE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE EISE WHO SUBMITTED �T7RITTEN CONII�fENTS pg WHO IS
O'I�RWISE ENTTIZED TO NOTICE. Z� DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROV�IL
CRITERIA. BASED UPON T'F� CRITERIA AND TF� FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHAI.L
APPROVE,APPROVE WITH CONDITTONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTTON.
SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAI�NG PROCESS:
♦ The application is accepted by the City
♦ Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day
written cpmment period.
♦�e a lication is reviewed by Ciry Staff and affected agenc,ies.
♦ ity Staff i�ues a wntten declsion
♦ Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purcha.sers of record of the site; all owners
of tecord of property located within 500 feet of the site,as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll;anp
City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaties include the site; and any govemmental agencp which is
entided to notice under an intetgovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such
notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice.
INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW:
The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are
contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development
Department Copies_ _o�se items ma_y be obtained at a cost of$.25 �rza�e or the cutrent rate charged for this service.
Quesrions regar�g this app catton shoi e ected to the Pla.nning Staff indicated on the first page of this Norice
under the section titled"Your Right to Provide Written Comments.."
� «ciMrr a.can
� si.x:ooG-loous
i.��rrx�==
` DR9IN.PGE a'�
RELOCI.TION �O�Co� — ��
I ��..�1 J�.W-���---.�a
'� ��.
�.�.� .�� ,�k �^ �
y.
G
R Y I
IIS@1 � � `M
. _ _ ..�I
1 r Q
)�le� j °�
. �
�5 � 35BB F�,�� R �
N •!��l�� NtI.�
i{5.37 q3l.! i1L� � 7t .ft
ta,ra
202 r o"r - - - �0 -�
R.-• ' 300 .69 AG l � - � �°' '�
ac. "' 1.13 AG �I , 6'
y "�'t��� � � y
:'�
/ ;�r^+b �
s�so ie�.
� 2�1 IC.S. 21,0761 � V `«y
" / 35,AC. �
= xn
� o M.E �
•_ = 2�+0`,� �n:0 .
•,� � .20AG. ` "` ` 'L Y
��'4�' M �. '� \�b +�+•
_ .66,CC. � ��
` O
•Ijpp _ _ 11¢O � � n� 4 + �
�� o isS.�s ¢0.7 R� ^ q �' ./
tt7 - 'J
� �'�` CASCADE A �''' � '� '
ti.t �_ R •. °� a
— ��'� sv.��otn �D.�� � ���.� % �tsl w
M 11 a7 '� 209.92 A�f> 7 "tiO... (�-1994 �I-3!I • • C.R.
' ' = 9� 23-81 9''° � �-
I ,-��,?=s AVEN U E� �
�
I �+; 2.73At. , . r m�� .q r � ��
s I � I �' �X �o SEE MAP
�+. �� � t IS I ?138D
N ��
`�
• I r � `���
h� �
,` ( i ' ��±� O a,0'
O
\ �. �
I -^I +'� O �• C�N[EL�LD tLI L0�3
7i�.ss { �p o ° y/�� �' �oo,�oo, .
( p' !� ` �I'
.f7 — 11 — — N ��•ii'N t1T.0�~ *a
, � � •�•sr �� � e�o.�s
`� �
`� ' N �00� I �a
I • w Y �26 Rc. ��
o �
\ I : M i
L'i _� J
R � •
"� >O
•
0
I \ w ��2 r �
� �p�31�� f �
` �1r �
I "' � �
e
� �! �J
_ _270 J __
0
s
• sss.q trt �=,N �5 • �.sl � •'
H�l1'��[ SZ .+ r^
A�.�1 N :� (��� �ppE�`�'p!� � ii
w Id .//Ae. „
� �
,� ss�.�� � R N Y1��� _
t�"��Z� /� � 2 FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONIY
_�-�_ ,.- � tW D� N07 RELY ON FOR ANY OTHER USE
�
I 100 ► r �
�./2 4c. �
•o
, CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
.� w �
` 'Y Map number 1 S '�S �
rs�=� ��,�* ;n.is This plat is for your aid in locating
' your land with reference to streets and
� �,. others parcels• While this plat is
` I; : believed to be correct, the company
. °� assumes no liability for any loss
� �; ��» occurring by reason of reliance
0
�� thereon•
r'
' • • ,�`���iR�IT�M� �r�rM�1 1•
�� ,�,Q,a N° � . p� ti h- •
, . .. ;
3 �_�.,...... raw.,� w.w _
�: n4' Y�.' � .+J r�� _ Y� 11 i+' �'
Z � � I
D I I � �.Y rl, �� � � �
� - � � .
- ..-.
� p , _ � -
, !— . � F + ,Y� �
; -� ;--- �.�o ps ► - ; -
� - i �
� t �. �O� s -�'� I s —� , �
� � I O
( t ' '� (�
� * ! � �
' L .
—s = I � � G �
,• � t �••' �:r w' •� J ': O N
, — _/ ` r - lL
_ _ - --- • '• - - ------- - ------- --------tA------- —
�.•
t _ . � j. , ' •3-�lD�� - -_s--- --
.._i i 1 J \ }�u��sw s t � .. \`
I ��
--_ - �.' • / � � - * �
� —r �'�-�' �---� .�–� � ; - �
i j ., �- :
�, ,• ....
s r- ��a
t •
� �
9
!
_� � �� � •` _ �
i
iG�� . .� � � . �
� .�/�. . �:� � - .
� ..� o._.E., ,� Q� �. . ����,, o .
� � N _
�. . �
� •r " --._...,-. y , �
' �\ ` ' �U v 1 � �
,` , — 1 . ' .� �aa
� .� �, eg,� c�o-�-(.� �o
� . � .� �io'
srre. �.r•N • c
� . w�at w wawt:C.'T� �
1 `�!
. • _ �i
/ .
Greenburg Center
n 10765 SW Greenburg Road
Tigard, Oregon
, •- , ___:�—
Property Tax Lot No. i
Cascade Drive Washington County �
R1346485 �
I
�
Parcel iI - Misc. Shops (NOZ' 7-11) .� '
Property Tax Lot No. � R1346485 �� � I
A tract of land located i�� the Northwest quart�� of Section 35, �
Township 1 South, Range 1 West of the Willanette Meridian, �
Washington County, Oregon. As described in Book 304, Page 99 and
Book 366, Page 4 and Boo}� 529, Page 491 Deed Book Records.
JLn 06 06 03: 14p Joel Gisler 15413221836 p. l '
' ' '���j��,� %���.�
J�EL GISLER 5
1470 N.E.FIRST ST.,ste.tk150,BEND,OREGON 9770;
Phone:(541)317-8717
Fax; (54t)322-1836
TELECQPY TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET
PI.EASE DELlVER THE FOLLOWIIVG TO:
NAME: � � � `
�
LOCATION:
FROM:
� R E:
DATE: ���p �, TIME: _3: r��.�
NUMBER OF PAGES (including cover sheet): �
If you do not receive al!of the described material, please telephone immediatefy.
COMMENTS:
RECEIVED
JUN 0 7 2006
CITY OF TIGARD
PLANNING/ENGINEERING
Jun 06 06 03: 14p Joel Gisler 15413221836 p. 2
Joel Gisler
1470 N.E. First Street, Suite#150
Bend, OR. 97701
Phone: (54l)317-8717
Fax: (541)322-1836
June 6,2006
Emily Eng
City Of Tigard
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Re: Sensitive Lands Review(SLR) 2006-10005
Tree Reinoval Permit (TRE)20o6-00010
Dear Emily:
I am part owner and manager of SafeGard Mini Storage. This property is directly north of this project and is
located at ]0585 SW Greeai6urg Road.
I support this project so long as it is constructed per the plans I have provided�vith this letter. More specifically,
the existing drainage ditch, beh�een tax lots 700 and 800, is culverted so as to continue functioning as a drainage
mechanism.
This eaisting ditch currently drains my facility, the Honda deafership north of ine and the Ofifice Max. It is
important that it is not abandoned.
lf you liave any questions, please give me a call.
Sinc rely,
� �G/7
c���,/' .!
Joel Gisler
' 4
C
7
O
' �.
x� � O
r ,
/ . + � �/� �
{ �� V.i
+ ' �
1 i
/ EXISTING BUI�DIN i ! Y � W
; � .: �'
; ! ; � �
au � ; -w
iI y�, � C R1 - V
Ynr Xbu ""'I"".�..—�__ � Z i��L`�.
i ----.._—_-�_.. i '.. L
Q
. � -„'_'_�-.----.--_._ 1 i 'J 7c�°'
,,,as XISTING SCALE �VAULIT"�-- � W �3�
XISTING �—_� i� _ ❑UTFALLT❑
�' N:4723.0790 — — f— s+¢ �"�
CULVERTS ti ,�--_._.__ __ _ PR�PERTY � � o
�' iaoa�.aiao , , —, . —.__ cn `?� � �
� ;.� �OINT:PK o � � --jcu.z xwe x,z.a � �
�:sr.� � � F i ' ;�
.L� _ �.'U XW�.�_„ � Xneo Xuu X �
., W �'–�_'_._-�—__.�._ i j X�at 1 i
! ;�«»;pR❑TECT POLE ; v –"�" DGE A/C o �
LI � iii., x�,e'�� �_�y „� W x� ��i9 i l �
'X��... n11 .. � �-`- ._:_. -...._
,_. ._
. '..._ __.kieu-_ , . . . __... _ . _.__
_..
____.
/fMf_._.__ %xr: Y.^i . � �..�.. ..._" �-..__ :
. . ......'__.�07 . . . ._.� .__._� ...� .__ ..._.. ...._X10Lf. (/f
' --+:���..__._ . .. , �
z � ___
.. _ t'Htw.,,.,.�.. Xfu ._._.._ ..�.___.. .. ._-_Xws .' H __ _ .
..�_.".,._ . iop.. -�U ..
.�.._ xfu ' °
—�.,— _ __ �
.. _. _,,_x±+a _. - � _ . .
au
_ .. ......,.. x�.. ..._ x�m
TREES -<- _.:,o�_ ,. ,�,,, x���x�, _x,u �_ �+• v,
�---CHAIN LINK ;� _� _' -"':..X ss ,�'��
EXISTING DITC F ENCE 0 70 40 6G z ,�
PLAN VIEW rREE
y ,SCQ�C: ��= TQ �� ��.
� z ��
.'• ,
>,�
° � � � �.
� � � � U1
o � � �
° CrossSecticn-1 CrossSection-2 � �
� 120.0 120,0 I20.0 120.0 N
� N
g �
" II0.0 1LDA I10.0 11aA m
° 1 .5' 1 4� W
`o �
`0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100,0
N H W o,
� 90.4 90.0 90.0 �W 90.0 ;
G
4 p
Q ��.Q OQ.� 8�.� 80.G
V
� SECTION 1 SECTION 2 r,, �
. .
_ �, �
- �
c'
�
0
" m .
X„� o
� m
� ; � ���
' ' o
; ;
i � ' �
Y t
IPE-ENiI � i _ �
�,
«... : :� IE=+/-97.5 � ; � a� � �
' ,` CONTRACTOR x«, , p z-
xr,., � Yc�qp"'�----�—�_. i Ll� ��p
' TO FIELD VERIFY : -`---�-----____._ t � =�„
AFTER EXCAVATION j '- — �----- . � ; DITCH INLET a °�d
; a ��
` SAW CUT A/C N:4723.0790 *�� ---' ----- SEE SHEET O �:�� c,
BOTH SID�S /� t000�.aieo , �` ---_�__ � '�---_�-__..�, ' : a _��
' N ,w,...—_._ I�=+/- 99.5 � ��� {t 0
c° / OINT:PK M �-x� xue, xwas ; fD
q�"' �� , � X�_�_""` C❑NNECT SC��E DRAIN x,�n � ~
�—REM❑VE �XISTING ;'w --- �.NEW t;UL�VERT -' """ lau ���8 G7
x
, 2
/x,�. DUCTILE CULVERTS = � �� � .
.� /�'A A''." —.�._._I00,_. � GCt
r � -0 0069 APPR❑X
, - ---
,.. __ x�. . ..-
x�sax__ i __ _.... - _ — . . 'V x i a r
_ 4 PIPE
_� S t
...�^J`.J__ t " X9LO ._..� � .. . . .._.. y � ��(1 I11
9f/.____ .. ' .
1 iY
_..._�.._ . _'_. . ..._
' . 00 .` . . _..... ._. 1(IOIl
' . .�_'_. _....._._ ._ �- .
- . . _.._ "." _ " - '.-. ... 3(INS. (/1
� ��Xt:tc.,.__ ,�. . . � _'_' . _.
... _ . __,._. . .._iu0 O
_.._..X»a �'-..__ � .... .
x �
_-, - X„ �
, __ _, _.
DEFLECT PIPE -� -- ---
-:.- ,:�,�
OR FITTING EMOVE "'°°` -"""'�'-E'-- �
_ __ ____ "
AS REQUIRED BUSH/TREE � - � x�" �
REMOVE TREES� $��
IP-RAP OUTFALL 0 20 90 60
CLASS 2 DUOT REM❑VE/REL❑CA7E p�qN VIEW
c EXISTING FENCE �
;
� Scale: 1" - 2p' . `
/��; � .
a �,: .��
� +
�°+ � F g r-�
� i � f (11
� q �
� CrossSection-1 CrossSection-2 s �
Qt2o.0 120 0 I20.0 12oD N
i N
o A -GR VEL ►�
v tlo.o ' S, lio.o 110.0 RA L ��0.0 m
1 4' Wm
L i y,
y 100.0 N lOQ.O 100.0 i ]00.0
x H W j � ,'
� 50.0 '90.0 90,0 �W 90A �
� P ❑P❑ ED P QP❑ ED ` �I
�. P PE P PE
� 80 0 80A F30.0 80A
i
�
q SECTION 1 SECTION 2 � -�
% � .
� � �
. �
c
�
. o
m•
0
n�_— ;i �y� m
b o
_ w
a ;
� , : ..
INLET IRM1E. '�� `� �
I--`
R iAIAIWG . i 7 'B i (� .-
li �� � �
,
G �
1 , ' , C7
EbST.AC. .:i. OERCf�E WARNWG TRF[ . �:. ,' � �A �'J�
I �...... ..._ ........ vf � li:
a���r{�t �....s�!U6R�� . - j� . ..... RIY- ]Q00 P9 I � -, ���'
fiVE BAIXi1LL •� � �t,0' .. ... w.NW�r w/C cana[�E b( Q r'�
� . ;. � .
(anna+oFSnmcr�q , ' exnr.wc cri� �i �'�a
:• sss•ct ltl �
_.._._.. _. ___
.�
t � 0
r�U
�DdNG ,ti'.�� ' t . '�`�'! � u . �
!'NN�' ),I�i1'' �.�_ � .. � n
QIUSIfD FOCK �L � 1! '1�� � F,
x_.�?''. , r-wus ?. f
s....�.ir . �f F��� /`�• + ' � L�
oeunogn. �"j�
ccmrxn� °
(�s-�aui�n � � -n� °�a ¢� � ' � l.�E r.
ar¢orea> �s-, ntto . r.voc �� � �� i' : �i �;a�g �
. NSFEC�MJN . Plu! , f p 4. 1+�C r
.�. . , .; t£ '�,�' �
rro1Fe. ... . .. { �
1. 13'P1KN[Ni$(�Tlpl-1'AC OYFfl!�CCWAGTEO GR�{hl . � �: S� . :��i k.
1f; A C
.; . �
- ' � • ; ,. _.�
`.. .f i �; - _O
� ?�!=i G_;:L.;`Y� :�: Br��K�li � •��s :. -i , �
y �. ` _ :� � i: t�
�S( . .._._ -�j.. ' ' NOK 1 �.�. .6_ _ ��
_i� � � `1
� �-- ,,•::
. + ' F011NDATd1 ......_. ..... .. .' � �
:........... . . .�, � , ' .
NOIES:
�.CONtRAGTRI TO NOQI EMCAVATIMI AS P[OURED TO OBiNN C04P�Cilp1
� MM tON[1UCTORS CQAPACTqN COIAPM�li. �,� .ly,
�t
'«�- �L I./i !`•,.�i ���C I $y. � �
b `
a i � � N
� SHEE7 NOTES: � � � p �
0
c AOJUST PIPE BACKFlLI BASED ON � 'i �
-° SELECTEO 61D AL7ERNATE. t W
[
N
n PiPE A�TERNATE 1: ASTM-3034 OR C�ti Cv xCY N
�� 6ACKFILL 50-15Q PSI CDF f,,
u
i �
0
v �
6 PIPE ALTERNATE 2: CLASS 50 0.1. PIPE � �
0 BACKFILL �'-MINUS COMPACTE� GRAVEL
6
'o
�
n
i '
m i
V
1:
C
'l
m
U
V
(;
�
ci q �
I
I
. `
c'
�
0
' m _
0
„.����ti c', -;c . r•.-�� n� �� "�' ' _ ` �
��.�ns>,,_<<F��}���h:;t T!;r.; � cD�ci)
__ ... - ---- .. �n�a n� '="' _ _ - _ _ O
i� ue*mx o ne aostK +ncn tamc�[sc rwi am rar r�emc ro srucrs >cv+r..c.a IS q1Tp1]]AC i0 OCKIP�Oirp�nnsi I�n/�RGr
/�� I ) um r+[xrr ro ocncc��v rr�mvK, J (v
oonenrt...owovK or wu,w�r�a wn�a xsa{co..aa uo KCR��lLC KMK OSUIK.CfMR RM�Uq R CRAV{TT I�av Q p 1
�2nna:.rarw.n xwu�srnxn.r+cs wr ec acouwct.
LOL�TOX Of ROIdi R[STeCtG�;p,w(l;P(qHtq�lMU�IlS UA1nQ C�[.) Y��'1i�m P�ST 0� t. Dv.C�ii SNµ�](StiCO fIIR TroIG1l r1KC fLOYi. ,y � �
L TE Y\F]�f�TOI tr L[SF CSC RANS�T!CmSIRUCIIW.�4NIDIANR fYTEP fMWC � S1E4 FENCE POST C. IV TrS CASL�'�LARCi RAN CVMT CIXRRKTQI 141Y�C�[OUIICJ LL Y�
F]
MJ'ULWQIC NO VPtitAd/,G tX MY CSC��01f1[1 R 11[11[la9p{Jtt p � ± , t0 Nr vptR�RC��IE�ew+���11E3 10 Co�rlti.E�']ec �— y t. �/�
ME COYfAAGiOR W R k1 COIISIItlICfIW 1!O�MIRO!W/AI�OKD LID � � ...; '.. -�FEMFA�PMG METiIYG �] *' V 1
cpu,wp��(Qi4nW�,WpSWy�C IS[STAW9m. BAa�- � .: �.' .�- :/ AS REOUMED 2.�DOIT�ML 10.lIMilQI R0.�i0 Si�IR[SC f0.M0AIlW M[�M M Z tp � �
iREMCM '.� { ] `.� C�SE 0�LLCN V�iLp Ic IK cCSPQIil➢IUtY S iK COITpACipL �I
� nc taamurcs K 1HC qEUN1G UN15 swor�cn wf n.w wu e[aL�Rr 1 � 't 1:' 0 Z�j Z
IUG,m N M[�OD CM1!i0[bRR lnc 61AMC n(OO�STICIkN MO0�0. :; 3 .Y-2'�' EY6T.Qtq1,0 U �Wy'C
MO I�T�UBWtC DCRVO TC N.fl�4EIAxG Wi5 G4!�C R1VT1F0.11E { � }.:�� 10 ST�IICS '.3 4
R\GW:4ALL fff WNiW(L Gv N(CQIR�C�O��d M[0.A��q1 6 "�
Z Q
ca�snucnai -��2,��y ...., . .'1 - �1r. . y��,' . ....�. O �r O
�. M[Y[/�*S vVf�On Mz R�w wrsl�CMnUCR[�CM}CTd Z!i� 5f �'.�L N
rm uL at.ut�c wo aua�e�cnras.wo r aia��wtw n ro as.�a . �i��. _-.�. (n ,$'�p� C.�
nur tce�n�i+o smnat u�c�r Mm�m hnT a�a nc a.aaa ssrtv. i � � O �o� � O
IIaVYK M NalA1E MNJGpF��RA ST/lOMCS � .1��:.. 'i_ :.
y
f M[Y'iMLT[S fWw�W�NS RNI Mf ME rWM�FAA[l01fL It1R ' ! ��.- � ' _ .. . �y �u_� � �
/MICP�I[0 91E m41WR 01141G TIC CR1SOSICIId RA0.t iKX OC LL
fAOUV wu�[Vawto�s wROEU sa uwcvcc�m smY nda rD ro � - - . ..... -.
..__: .., �� ' ! ti
OB/[M1c���Urt/HU ZOK�t UGO+v�RT 00 MOi ILK M 91C ........_._ ..�.`._...._ .. W F+
t IK GC flld/�E]fWLL�(r9ECIFp pllr eV ort coxn,K�pa Yq WnT.wCn
N 1[6NN�10 d414�!�C4�1MlW IlMC11MxG p� �
�. nc nc o.a�xw a.uca.c s�.�u.a.scc+m ro u�xru�� �.ner,rtunor�vuu raurnr m[uu�.ir►tnmExs �A�� N.
I�MY K�I[f�Y01111 tll YIM�UE S�XU�1]lALO�W A Sl'il�i[W/f. �aun[�nxnas. aca�{ �1
d �t�o wc wu�orc m..ac nor ar aanrt c�uam m�mwtnu 9
YMM A N�O��iW MP4 Nl Gfd 0��!YO GPIK'MR lM3 91N1 L RiCA FIBXIL-USF IYM�I�X�MM FWS. j�C 1-r
�a[w[D nio�ro I.wc oe aru.ic aa�na wu�ar nuv�scdi�xr �G��: ro
uro+..ro�Nro�c oow�muu srsw. � �;F i I;�/��j�j T FF��'t - -
� f.wuno twn�utaa�o1m�nus x�ut�c wn.um�r n[YEOw/rN aF �
con�xucm�wio ru�r..lm ro�i x o�anvi a nc eRO.ccc�adntruL 6 �
/�m i�ic�aw�nn��DwRSGi9Af M�T KL��Ym.VElS N1E�PI QCNI �
A
�f
PLAN VIEW �`�;
,�K: o � �
,
k�., . Xuu XM�-____. i
. � --__,,,_.—.__. !
� `_"—�.,_ i
� _� C �
' � BYPASS �.___ --�.___!_,�_ � � � -
�
� CHECK STRUCTURLnza.o�90 ' �---_. s• �
� /� z000�.aiao ��.!!_t_--- `!`_ ----_ ��, .
� / POTNT:PK i ----%ws xme x�.za
� / { swc i � s E r
�� �L'e � Y4w�.._.�.._.� ; . X�e¢o xioe.� X�ou x 4 � �{� �
�—�...__,_�_�___ �
� t �� WATER BYPASS � f @ �
-�'� � ��' �"' SYSTEM CBIDDER x�w BYPASS : � w
:� �s2��,..� -- _._._._ �
� ...9 krli .,._.__.. ............
<,
x� ._ _._x:�, �c�,___ -- . .x+.. r.,, x„_ - _ _ _:___ _. _. N�.____. . �ESIGNED) CHECK STRUCTURE � ►V
�
. __.._ __. _.. N
, --�oo =-.,.__,_ __.____ x�- ..._.
�� � .. �.. ..._.._.._. --wa,.... _. xx� --�-_... ...
.__._..__. .... �xwse._.
� . . _,.�:�-.r � �-_.
. _, � _ �
-- .-'.-_�. � Xx� t ...___ M
.____ qpL .,.,_ W
. ..._._ �-.._..._.._. .._ ..._.XYIa
/ � .. . � ..... .._K ..
. - ... .. ..�.�_. x1N —•__•_...� .. �
O
� -:--�-_..
� ' ._ _`..�:_-_=__...._._�OD X1015 7C9i3 _._ _' ..-
^ . -.. �.�..�. � "..._.
_ 1Cw... ._.....x!�a..____.._ _:�... _ Q)
_ '-
� � �`--..�:�., __'-..-.--,.
� ,_-..`__.._.,. ...._.........�J
._...._....._. .
5
m � LJ Q� 6J :i
� STAGING AREA —�� �
� PR�TECTED BY Scale: 1" - 70'
% ER❑SION FENCE
u
u
A
� S �
�
� y �
�
� �i T�VJ
. LANPHERE ENTERPRISES
z
: __
CULVERT REPLACEMENT x ;
__`_ �;�,E�, ,�, ; ' ' 1Q685 SW GREENBURG ROAD � �`` �
w �l,
_ 7�Z
TIGARD, OREG�N = ��
._ .. . ; .._
, �x�t•, ;,� W ��
ow:,aaT ._.... ;
... ..._. .. . . �
. r. .,.�__ . 9Yc9�' � . rwHV?�Ha, � ��G
m �� � PLUMBING PERMIT SUBMITr'AL `��=
- �:—. SITE LOCATI�N �, ~ ��` z
00 _ _.
ry Sl'&R7�(WM �. . . . W'�
N ': - a
N = .� i 7 : ,�'"1I.� t��i�
~ �� �� .. .��� il�;�.S 'F#��
��I1 - 1 _ '.,�.' :iF\;�i;� ^ `' LOhSIRJ�.':O:J J`..?l.t.`� �.,��"3!,
Y/ +'. �. I. M Cd1MCWn IE901Yd.[IM O(WU�P�+9 O�OSN t�
� �.. i �'. 1. ALL FIEV�IIM9 NE BIi➢ar�/ui lY9d[D�RdIR�P�MNY IS fWM d'Lw �
�-y � ' ����� plfFl. O11MC AC,d1RB5.SOfw/aK5 xm on���AR R�fMR�TOI IM[9R M!A
" iv: " 'i S. lIAIIMnC 6 K40 IiW CfH4%l1E Urf�C�nG�Y h0�fv. �uL M1^���n/YS u�0 90E'/�lM 9i4L![�04�i0 rfJl p�OUt
�"..� '`` ` f�V• •'�. � CpOL1b1 d ETE0.
t � •. i iu cansmicna'wa wmak s��u cwraa m ae rt.uva,w m[uauw[ a
� B`I�P' { ^- ME0I�ELD13 6 n�C�h�OROOi O�u4�11MlOIV ILN4MG Wl!�n0 7
. 2 9Ba�1R Nm 11m�d W06u w41![m�liclm m 1i t[�!i f3�V 1M
,• z .-...... IIFOXifLU11f K M1IE OTt 6 1WA0 M9�c knO�O�FHi O[fW S��NDWl. MNIYYM ORI 0[Mi1 Af OCN�IM��1 A71Y�IM.RLmMt 01;TiWC 1K
.�y�flN� ... � ��,. t^� . .. fvo e�a�rilm�ptS ra��tp q noi rflw�. m 3
- � . .. na cauuco nutuna wu rnra+r ro�u wuc.0 reuiw.srnc�wo �
.. . ' r IOCK CLOEi UiONMCEf MD FfWUmiS N6tAC KQ54�i>RMR MO 7.Rl5 dIM18E PLAf.ID M 9'-IY LOOSC 1/li NO CGYPKRG 10�at �
MI([1�w6�CP�w���M uat�wa wTMPe�[1. OOtlTY GI li IIAST 911f Of TC Ymflm cnOCiA���oar onr adatv �
(/STIO-M1j Wnw wa➢NC Mo rTa Y O[�TM v vn��K�ul inqll
LOCATOR MAP ' ,��'�,"�'H"""�'.�.a`�.`"�,��"`x`,�,�
qIS YM TI[O��ET. �. ��itll�r[ST�qlf���pMf f0 M S�Wi NO � ,,
l O(GV�TQiS WST COMiII MM NL PRONlOR Of O6 f!].M�Ip ai�3�w¢lDnG
FOli1CAPW 0�YL VOIIMdf L011P4(S OR�mlO[$6 Ill�ERfAqMp 111�J1�5 A !. SMOII 9RVW f WIDUNES q O[AR�AITI JYM1!E11m�EIISINC
111[PIIOLLT N6A AI ILAST Y i19K5-0AY Mqf0.�pJ1 ML�O2 Mui�o AW(NI INO ICt P�q��L
BIIflMESS O�YS SO MAt SIq YIU�t(S WY p[I�[LpA1fL�I OC1i[0�tfd�F
v tauddw wn[yuw.no� �. Sm+nu,cmn swi cx�ai�mwn�+w ism.+c u[sow ow�u[ �,d� �+t.1
� 1. M l➢CAIIW OF OOSIMG UWOtWP1N0 YIIUIES 910M1 OM mE RM's s ro. � ?
� ..l.�� � . ..: MqMAl101�IIY 410 IS MJl WMAMRID IO BE CpF'lL'R fF�C'_'u'�t'.'biTAK'f011 f.ADJIST Yl KnFNfK lTINCIUSS YMnfli l01 v�l�C p�[3.RG A � n �j�
� .q+t �� � . �F'.: swu war'�uc�.aaus,nac Ys.�o wmcu 1nc a ti U�n�a«,:,;�uars Flns�m wuc F„ a �
f� . ,...a... vmon m tawrrnic rw ca�smi.�cta um s�ui enn � ��v.�ts�o nc �, ' � Q
; �� � t � �ticvna a�nornc sawna�z n Hpics vww*a s� ��cr , e ta�x.s.ravcw auv�*ron.rac un,c ru wouni[wav�nv�i '.y i
_,....,
EM
� � 3� ! Y�.._ j ' twu � ` f
.. - � ��' . (._ �'.,r . a n[uam�ca ora+a nor etvarsac ca na sui�r a M...n�k..is�w a. i�c�ix�ucr�a«u mm��.0�uron.�x�w wo�mcoR�n
! r�- ` MS oer.�u c.txw w[av,na�s w.i eE smcn*�v n;w nr. nc wer fw nc srwK scvP�r rH[lpv�imrls.s�tt��nt�wCS.a
\ .TJ .' ' l �p�y,W�y M'/W[. MIYw M M RNI[ W�qti[xi W.�ll R 1�1D A 1RC/LYM[H�M �? y
� .. � �.. ��p � 2 j �Ofl1 PIK f�l'COff�'i�M1[qi�l�a.PWM U��K Rw4IRC � s S y�
O )1 Y•' ' �y `1 • R!{�RMr N10 iGMMIGi O105W COtlAOI YFISIKS 9MLL BC YY➢N MCmtL. LAY�IG 11WL X'fii�f M LOV fUMi 6/�C 111T[F Mi0 np[L[�
Lw� c 1� __' L1l�l.,,S L _ 1 �. Cd(U0.vGi.wGt bOC 1C Or 6 nOMOI N M[CED�r 10�EI10]M IPCf+MC V(1H Io1fAI Om5 IWNitFl4 UYiHOL y j a �
W �� ��1. I{,.� �u ' 10 GRYVNVL C�LOCID[W.V.G YK eeo rn,urs iwa�curn�ro�tt� ( � 1
� �h. __ ..[�� -'� '�a 10.1�f(nMOli1C101 M1 NCY�]Rl M YWIlY1NC yy Iq�pY�K KmWC TKY tlf�N D�N lGN 3�i1E 1�lli LVIl C lLCillU Y[fN 4U[IDERC AKS
j {r1�� - f .t v1t .WO rtE[oI Ev�ll�uGna u�N�W YO OEMO.MO'MOUONG K25SMY pRT CYf9tl1➢IL Td A[TM b]tt]u�l�Six f�i].[w�11�CT01 IM�Lt MOYUC
�f" � [
1n � ,,{� �0 CO+mOt wFR R0.11m. fIfTIXGi MI!TG.Mtttbl C2c�v�s qK�rIM.0 v]�M K�MO[�Itipp
'�1 C; �'. -. . ' 9 �. . . SfOPN PFtMG/S NEC[LIM�. f
►1 . � .. 7 �< � ��.sFa�E eAO�nlwc wYr aGO1.10F U11UT'YP10'21[NR CONiI�ICipl 10 9JIIKI/h'0
/^ l L --� ��..�� .. 7 i�,! ll. �4f0�YEl91rtELF�IR Gi FYCf IDG�M ND OEPM Il.:ILLIf.Op;l YC CUSRIKICO!ti IIE LO[�Ilplli.[�{V��f�q�MG G
,
y ��� �� i { � �' �I.41 RMT�q UCCMZI MC¢E�R1ltll TIE OS4U1d Mtl CMI[110M V I�pll( ]��+St�i/.i 99Vh W IK R/�1 tlltTi 3W�L I(A��lW�N lK
� '( �..11�� ryy . 12 9IYL K i6MfU�Y K OOM9IKTEII n�0�f0 CdNMdO CpI3AlILT01l M�UA�OL NtY DNW FEif�1�CM(IULL�fi1�0[➢.IFQW�ENMG Md
� iWlVd[fR�IE 4m fdvQti yull�[(pSi-IFOw fD�1f0Utffp��i
�}RIOR WY[WMC OOySlIRK11Ol M[LUI111ACi[P wtl NOtt�Ml�PIMCNI IP[(P�[G
i-�I , .. '�� �� .+ �...� �t{ JIl�,.��-^7 i fAY�Y�ES M�RIOCS YIOI INO[AQd1E UAiRS N H MOItf UKA 50 M�T
� v �—"`—•; � � w�l y����d� ia vo unune+Wr ee a�nu�+eL�wu�m. :z rao.N rnr�.rro. nwa ic nuw�r��o w�r.e�c w.wn[.�u
�ia} 4 � ��' .'�..`; ixt�ccrcn n rtmEwuuL rxcU[u n mron[as�taUnq rDORpiu�
0 a r r _ - Il M I�IIW v pS1�IC Y�01Gl�ING YII{11'd5 9N�OM K NMS G�OR tW W�A PYFrYAllf/l rNr K 4W140 UMA�4m'FL�qGI OG►QR.
.rmunw acr.wo n Moi aw++im ro a�,:o a.¢ von�ae�u au:vws �
r� �- �{:1 ;�y•-."'l '� .�= .f : I �:_`� _ �r. is�tccssur evont cas*�ucva�ro a+nar a.oc ro.uow�r w.vcrs
� 4l�.� b � p t
• ,. � � -- I� S Y 4Y MOO�fAYIO ViGM3 MYpI:0
� - s •••. ���/ - � �KMQr6 MM OMSAlIC1�ON MO 91NL 9WG Mv pXAED�MtlES 10 M�RU��
� :' . *��� ! � o' � - �} a�nc saunv+i �
� � � �� ' c ' t' 14 IF ADAKT NL iMpDQ�fK S�UCN�CS WN�OIE IAS YK1E BOKS EiG 10 fRMF. �
'
L ' '
W .-��... .._ l... .
ly:�t.k.r ' � 11.COMtlSIC SNALL Of AfM�-NU TRC[OfOHIN6 i0 1[�S1Y CM.iMC CYHrtUCTpR y
^ c 1 ' - 9,NL AC91YE T[Rf5Gda9B4n NI�a(L9W u9 VNOOtICr oE�sAW41Q.K
�L �.-�i `�p;�� y}� �t �.} a i � YfMM GM11CS95[Sl�OKM Idt ilipllY-mNT(IC)DAYS AINL K 1000 OqlWS
�!1 .. 3 , � �' ,. ..� �... PFA SOVYE MOI.WMPCIE 9W1�PIJCm N Cdi11NN£IIM AUCiIRS NO
y/ a .:5�j; : .: ,r.�:' -- :: �51I i). PEOOIN00AT0115 K M[ILVKMI�T[NSnN�E.
.� i ....- .. �a.ona�m nemo�r ar a+mnm ana.nic asixc sis�¢s+u x aumm�c
vori�enoc.m'z wu i uam ro�r nu rcr�ar n�cort•cr
.• • LL kM1ff n sWCI OSfdWU�Q rM K��MIf�C1tR0�3NSA1/GIqMi
m � V I C 1 N I TY M AP n. ��ilrp MS�PiKVp�i ro aua�sun�r ecr�m�n�c ovsnuc r��nrtrrt
� n
w me eane�.n�a Ra�+au rai owanan w aosvw r.e.o�uox srcrrus
µo oncx vx miwrs wnw n¢vnocc�u�u
(D s
0 � 2
�
O '
C
7
'� .
JLn 06 06 03: 15p Joel Gisler 15413221836 p. 8
^\fc\fep�arcts\ICrphcrc\bcu.crtorh.cndc\u �artonhu'�CCCOn�!ru:ticn.Owq
<.'I
D �
v ' �
T �
�..:
�;
'� v�r i c^, r a
�r -��o -., �-
--_�'i-;> �: ;-� �
�.0 �.1 rn - �...
_ --1 (.J f^ c
� 1 j:{7 �,C7
,,..�.a;:�Cl .r ��,C
i� I-. ���='
,�';/I�'�-'i •�..�r i Y�f". '.
I''t
.y��....:PT1 L7 �7 1"1 frt r?` J
.i?^� Z f'l i: .�7 i'"'v; C_
1 F°--' --� r; - �T'
/ i �7
, �
�.�..
;� j : :
�
i
;- � ,,,
s3��a � j ��\
1S(3) /�
.� 9)
. .�..__., ..
� - � 99 IS.�,1 �
. � � . . .. ....��J.� �.. N:
:_�,�..�
x.... '- . .._ , �
_�-� / '. . .�...�.. �
ff ��
., . �
�, S5� ..' �. Ys .1 ��..._.�.._._..� _.
'..I� . i�, - �d �� �.r ni���
! .......,y
; � .,, S(3) �
�� ; JNI/�Vd '�.;-... �. , : �.�' . . T
jg g' 9W15IX3 ., .... ... __' —
, .o ; ', _.. _......_. -y �' -- --
� \ ...._----- ' / _ - —
. ........ .._. _.._
i - ��
, ... ,
.� , �.__.__....�.,.-••" `JNIAVd / ,. �'�
, 9NI151X3 � l i
' j I I-•,---------___.� �._._.__ ' (
,' ;'I: i � �I� I .._ .�_,"�---- -;_�-.__---_� )
��! �; � � 1 ;
�' j, i J�� � � ' � :�
� i: ?. I { �
?}; j; ! j ' �: j �:
l� i � � •�t
I I �'� ' �
gs' , � -+ i
i � 1
L_� + ' I
� �; __._._____—�
;� \ H�ua _._ I
�; �JNI15iX3 � .__'-.--.y_----___._-----J
'� ;, �N7i1Vd
' �JNIISIX3 I
�' �
� _.._'— -___ 1� I
�--cvri.,- :.a:�r:s.n.�. � -�-�--�---��-.._.f-�--------- . . . , . . � �
w�s��w'4 Rowtn�eokitioro SITE OVERVIEUV '""'
- — ��! 4',.,"T.":�.�.. BFAV,i:I:�:�7.`J HOki)A 2
�J 'JGCS S'X Gi2��WhURC �+D �
..�,.: ,�. �±�, � ... ., , nc.tiko, ^H�.:cn 6
� i�IL�2�Yl..M :'pJ,E't.��
O6/14/2006 14:08 FAX 5038084375 CENWP-OP-G f�001
_ „
' RECEIVED
- ,�'�,�- J U N 1 4 2006
.,.
" ` �` �'��y�„ �� REQUEST FOR COMMEI�'��N OEN iGARD
� , �
_-• .. � -- '- = G NEERING
DATE: Ma�.24�2006
Tp; Katluvn Harris/US Armv Co;ps of Engineers
�c� mAY 2 s zoos
��j�; �1t�,r Of'X'1��P]an�ing Division
ST1lFF OONTAGT: EmilyEng,Assistant Placul�r(x27121
Phone: (503) 639-4171 F�: (503) 6243681 Email: Fmil�tigaxd-or.gov
SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW(SLR) 2006-10405/TREE REMOVAL PERMIT (TRE) 2006-40010
➢ LANPHERE ENTERPRISES DRAINAGE WAY RELOCATI4N Q
RE�LJEST: The applicant is requesting$ensitive Lands Review approval to reroute a dra.inage way. The proposed
activ�ty would also irnvolve replacuig and extending a culvert. The site includes two tax lots, which are commonly
owned. The applicant proposes to move the exist�ng drainage way, which currendy separates tax lots 00700 and
00800, to the east property line of tax lot 00840. The owner desires to reroute the drainage way to im rove water
conveyance and use the two tax lots as a single site. A tree removal pernlit is requ�ire�d to remove a 7" c er tree in
the draina�ge w�y. LOCATION: 10685 and 10655 SW Greenbur� R_ oad; WC;1'M 1S35BB, Tax Lots D�d the
00800. ZONE: ML3 • ' ed e Co ercial Distri t. The MUC zoc�ng d�stnct mcludes land aro
Washington Square an an ururiediate y west o ghway 217. Primary uses permitted include office buildings,
retail, and service uses. Also permitted are mixed-use developments and housin�at densities of 50 units per��acre.
Large�r� buildings are encoura ed in this area with�par. under,behind or to the sides of buildu'�g s. APPLICABLE
REVIEW CRITERIA: �e approval standards�or Sensitive Lands Review are described in Community
Development Code Ghapters 18.390 (Decision-Maku1g Procedures�, 18.510 (Commercial Zoning Districts�, 18.630
�as�on S uare Re ional Cenur , 15.775 Sensitive Lands ,and 18.790 ree Remov .
Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's StaternentlPlans for your review. From inforniation supplied
by various departcnents and agencies and from other uiformataon available to our staff, a report and recommendation w�ll be
prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application,
EE YO CO TS BA BY: 2 Q6 You may use the space provided 6elow or attach a
separate etter to retum your comments. I are e o r o d b the abo e d e please phone the staff contact
noted above withyour commenrs and co irmyou�r� comments uz writin as soon as possi�Ie. If�u have any questions,
contact the'T�igard Pl�uining Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,� 97223.
PLEASE C:�-iECK THE FOLL�WING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
� We have reviewed the proposal have no bjections it. of our office.
I'lcase contact � �'�
Please refer to e enc ose etter.
� Written comments provided below:
1—L�✓�U ` D,�n.if%1 ��VuA�NVK��iLri��r,��✓, ,�a�'� / �"_t.- �
a �
Name&Num er o Person s Cornmenting: ���� L�3 �$-�3��
��
.
RE QUE ST F OR COMME NT S
DATE: May24,2006
TO: Jim Wolf,Tigard Police Deparrment Crime Prevention Officer
FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division
STAFF CONTACT: EmilyEng,Assistant Planner(�712�
Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 624-3681 Email: Emil eigard-or.gov
SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW(SLR) 2006-10005/TREE REMOVAL PERMIT (TRE) 2006-00010
➢ LANPHERE ENTERPRISES DRAINAGE WAY RELOC.ATION Q
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Sensitive Lands Review approval to reroute a drainage way. The proposed
activity would also uivolve replacing and e�ending a culvert. The site includes two tax lots, which are commonly
owned. The applicant proposes to move the existing drainage way, which currently separates tax lots 00700 and
00800, to the east properry luie of t� lot 00800. The owner desires to reroute the drainage way to improve water
conveyance and use the two tax lots as a single site. A tree removal permit is requ�ire_d to remove a 7" caliper tree in
the draina� ge way. LOC'.ATION: 10685 and 10655 SW Greenbu•g Road; WCl'M 1S35BB, Tax Lots 00700 and
00800. ZONE: MUC: Mixed Use Commercial District. The iMCJC zoning district includes land around the
Washington Square an an irnme iate y west o I�'ighway 217. Primary uses pernutted include of f ice buildings,
retail, and service uses. Also pernzitted are mixed-use developments and housing� at densities of 50 units per acre.
Larger buildin� gs are encourage�d u1 this area with parking under, behind or to the sides of buildin s. APPLrCABLE
REVIEW CRITERIA: The approval standards for Sensitive Lands Review are descri�ed in Community
Development Code Chapters 18.390 (Decision-Making Procedures), 18.510 (Commercial Zoning Districts�, 18.630
ashin on S uare Re ional Center, 18.775 Sensitive Lands ,and 18.790 ree Removal .
Attached are the Site Plan, �cinity Map andAp plicant's Statement/Plans for your review. From inforn�ation supplied
byvarious departments and agencies and from other ulformation available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be
prepared and a decision will 6e rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application,
WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: LJNE 07 2006. You may use the space provided below or attach a
separate etter to return yc�ur comments. I u are una e to res ond b the above date, please phone the staff contact
noted above withyour comments and co u�my�u�r� comments in writu'� as soon as possible. If you have any questions,
contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,aR 97223.
PLEASE CI-�CK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: '
'� We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enc ose etter.
_ Written comments provided below:
IName &Number o Person s Commenting: ��M ���,� �l 2'�b�
., ti
WETLAND LAND USE NOTIFICATION�'ORM
(this fonn is to be completed onlv by planning department staff for mapped wetlands/waterways)
DEPARTMENT OF STATE LANDS WETLANDS PROGRAM
775 Summer Street NE,Suite 100; Salem, OR 97301-1279; (503) 378-3805
1. County: Wccs�iv�.e, }�v� LocalCaseFile#: SLR-2-�� — �ood5
City: ���a�r� DSL File#: WN (completed bv DSL Staffl
Responsible Jurisdiction: (�City ❑County DSL Project#: �completed bv DSL Staff�
2. APPLICANT: P��-t F. ��`1 . LANDOWNER: +e '�e—►
� Z l S 3 S I�J 1/�lm+V► tt- ���- �-c� FsL.j CA,,,�,,,��,►.�P.-�
mailing address � t�� mailing address
mailing address mailing address p,
��f C�7�_ �.���'I `�ew��n , C�f� l Z.o�-
( r0 3� -_�a�`t Z1P a._..�C{� � city,state zip
J
phone phone �
3. LOCATION
T I S R�_ S 5�� %< TaJC Lot(s) ��� (�d �O O
Address (streedcity) �� p S S'� StJ 6�e � a.ZZZ3
NWI quad map name
Attach all the following(with site marked): LWI NWI Map(if no LWI map) .Parcel Map .Site Plan(if any)
If applicable attach: ❑Other
4. SITE INFORMATION
LWUNWI Wetland Classification Codes(s)
Adjacent Waterway(if any) �1 vv� / �Pcd�- C�w_12 �� Zoning f'�,c.,l L
5. PROPOSED ACTTVITY �'��"'`�`�
❑site plan approval ❑subdivision
❑grading pennit ❑planned unit development
❑conditional use pernut ❑building permit(new structures)
�Other S�S i{�� �..�t r�u►c�,a r,,.rc�Q � re �pL.k-e q a
Project Description �a�-�
Completed by/Contact C�'' Q F l i Date 2, �-c�co
Address � 3�ZS 3W E}o�l\ ��_ \2 � f3`R— Z�— Phone: (S o3) - '11
DSL RESPONSE
❑A removal-fill permit is required from the Department of State Lands
❑ A removal-fill permit will be required when the development project proceeds
❑A removal-fill permit may be required
❑A permit may be required by the Corps of Engineers(503-808-4373)
❑Information needed includes:
❑ A wetland determination/delineation report(Consultants list enclosed)
❑
❑ State Permit# ❑was issued ❑has been applied for
❑No removal-fill pernrnit is required for the described project if/because:
Comments:
❑ On-Site Visit By: Date:
Response completed by: Date:
* If the project is changed to involve fill or removal from the wetlands area,a state removal-fill pernut will be required.
http://www.oregonstatelands.us/wetlanduse.htm August 2004
_
;::..;.:::.
— ' \�� CITY 4F TIGARD
� - Z- WETLANDS INVENTORY
-C-13
\ UNIT 2
�� \` � �
-.� \ �,�„g, � � Identified Wetlands
sr �
i>�\ —
\'. !� 1 Wetlantl ID
. \\\ � � � � �II I
� ` � o � - - Aquatic Resource Unit
� a �'j�
� \ ���J II IIIIII IIII�I---yII� � Boundary
\ ` \ �1JN
/ �
\� �"�__� ? �� Stream Corridor
� � ' �.1�1 �- � ,� � 1 Wetlands
�B;, �` '`8-121' �/ � -
r �
� . . . . � � PIMf T �
� � �,�� - _g 3�a Public Land Survey
� ) $� a
,�, �_�� � ` -- �_ ---�1 -- � o� Section IDs
� $H� LM '� ` � �' 1 /� � �
7 s�� �
` V `\ ■
\ �� / \`\\ � d
..�� \ y9. . . �-i �. / \\Y_` �.�`-�-�? � < \ � ..
�-16 15 I ��� ` – 3
� �
1 ',�,� � ��� -��-L J— .� 9 — o, '
y - C-12 �`
� � ,.,��.� --_. r �
�.�
-,ao�- ,
' Source Scienti(ic Resources I�c. and
Fishman Environmental Services. Aerial
\ photography from April, 1994 at a
� / �` ` nominal scale of 1" = 400'.
�v -. ` Information on this. map is of a
'� generalized nature. In all cases, actual
� • \ � Field conditions determine wetland
�e,�� boundaries.
]^� ,� � .� \ Public Land Survey Information: All
/ I �� ie � �w�
Public land sur'vey sections depicted on
� s this map survey are within either
�
� ��� F � 9'" T1SR1W or T2SR1W.
, � \� �
`'\ T�X fL�C m .
�Q...� `\\'� ./�\ � ',
\\`�''��`� � � y2 NORTH
: � f p
�.�\- +'" Scale 1":600'
�� 1. � • � � � 36 � FEET
.
1
,
,�� �� o soo �200
� , �' ♦ � . _ ; PLOT DATE: 02/10/95
W
.
� ' �
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
Dr�TE: ��ia�� 24,2U06
TO: PER ATTACHED
FROM: Cit�of Tigard Planning Division
STAFF CONTACT: Fmil`�F.ng, �-�ssistant Planner (x2712�
Phonr. (503) 639-�1?1 Fax: (503) 6?�-3CH1 Email: Emily_(c�riQard-or.gov
SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 2006-10005/TREE REMOVAL PERMIT (TRE) 2006-00010
➢ LANPHERE ENTERPRISES DRAINAGE WAY REL�CATION Q
REQUEST: The applicant is rec�uesting Sensiti�-e I.ands Re�riew approval to reroute a dYainage way. The proposed
acuvit�- would also invol�re replacmg and extenciing a cul��ert "I'he site iricludes two ta� lots, which are commonlv
owned. 'I"he applicant proposes to move the existing drainage way, which currend�T separates tax lots 00700 and
00800, to the east propert�� hne of tax lot 00800. Thc owncr dcsires to rcroute the drainage way to unpro�re water
conveyance and use the two tax lots as a single site. r1 tree removal permit is required to remo�re a T' caliper tree in
the drainage wa�-. LOCATION: 10685 and 10655 SW Greenburg Road; WCT1�f 1 S35BB, Ta� Lots 00700 and
00800. ZON�: MUC: �lixed LTse Commercial District. The �'IL�C zoning district includes land around the
Washington Square ��all and land iinmediatel��west of Highway 217. Primary� uses permitted include office buildings,
retail, and ser�-ice uses. 1�lso permitted are mixed-use de�relopments and housing at densities of 50 units per acre.
Larger buildings are encouraged in this area with parking under, behind or to the sides of buildings. APPLICABLE
REVIEW CRITERIA: The approval standards for Sensitive Lands Re�-iew are described in Communiry
Development Code Chapters 18.390 (Decision-Making Procedures), 18.510 (Commercial Zoning Districts), 18.630
ashin on S uare Re �onal Center), 18.775 Sensiu�-e Lands ,and 18.790 ree Removal).
rlttached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement/Plans for�-our re��iew. From informarion supplied
b�- �-arious departments and a�encies and from c.>ther inf<�rmauon a�-ailaUle to our staff, a report and recommendarion will be
prepared and a decision ��ill l,e rendcred on the propc>sal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this applicari�n,
WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: ,jUNE 07, 2006. You may use the space provided below or attach a
separate lerter to return �c�ur comments. If�ou are unable to res�ond by� the aboae date, please phone the staff contact
noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions,
contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
_ We have re�-iewed the proposal and ha�-e no objections to it.
_ Please contact of our office.
_ Please refer to the enclosed letter.
_ Written comments pro�-ided below:
IName &Number of Person(s) Commenting: I
' '' ,:ITY OF TIGARD REQUEST F COMMENTS
NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS
FILE NOS.: L� O �� FILE NAME:
CITIZEN INYOLVEMENT TEAMS
14-DAY PENDING APPLICATION NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES OF AREA: ❑Central �st ❑South ❑West
CITY OFFICES
_LONG RANGE PLANNING1Barbara Shields,Planning Mgr. OMMUNITY DVLPMNT.�EPT./Planning-Engineering Techs. �POLICE DEPT./Jim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer ,
_BUILDING DIVISION1Gary Lampella,Building Official � GINEERING DEPT./Kim McMillan,Dvipmnt.Review Engineer �UBLIC WORKS/Matt Stine,Urban Forester ��Py\t
CITY ADMINISTRATIONlCathy Wheatley,City Recorder UBLIC WORKS/Rob Murchison,Project Engineer �y.� `
✓PLANNER—POST PROJECT SITE IF A PUBLIC HEARING IT M-10 BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING! -�p �„���
SPECIAL DISTRICTS
_ TUAL.HILLS PARK 8 REC.DIST.+_ TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE 8 RESCUE�M TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT�r�CLEANWATER SERVICES�
Planning Manager North Division Administrative Offce Lee WalkerfSWM Program
75707 SW Walker Road John K.Dalby,Deputy Fire Marshall PO Box 745 155 N.First Avenue
Beaverton,OR 97006 14480 SW Jenkins Road Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124
BeaveRon,OR 97005-1152
LOCAL AND STATE IURiSDICTIONS
CITY OF BEAVERTON � CITY OF TUALATIN �IF �R.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE �OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS
_ Planning Manager Planning Manager Devin Simmons,Habitat Biologist Melinda Wood ry�uN F�rc.q���.e�
Steven Sparks,Dev.Svcs.Manager 18880 SW Martinaai Avenue NoRh Willamette Watershed District 775 Summer Street NE,Suite 100
PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 18330 NW Sauvie Island Road Salem,OR 97301-1279
Beaverton,OR 97076 Portland,OR 97231
_ OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM.
METRO-IAND USE&PLANNING � _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.8 MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE
_ CITY OF DURHAM +It 600 NE Gra�d Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380
City Manager Portland.OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232
17160 SW Upper Boones Fry.Rd._ Bob Knight,Data Resource Cenler(ZCA) �1S ARMY CORPS.OF ENG.
Durham,OR 97224 Paulette Allen,c�nu��,�c�m��o� OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.B DVLP. Kathryn Harris�r.P.acws�.n..o�y�
_ Mel Huie,GreenspacesCoordinator(CPA/ZOA) Larry French�comp.aia�,m,�a�so�iy� Routing CENWP-OP-G
CITY OF KING CITY� _ Jennifer Budhabhatti,Regwnel Planner(Weflands) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 PO Box 2946
City Manager _ C.D.Manager,c��n Ma����,c s��� Salem,OR 97301-2540 PoRland,OR 97208-2946
15300 SW 116th Avenue
King City,OR 97224 WASHINGTON COUNTY�
OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY(Powedines in nrea� _OR.DEPT OF AVIATION(wonoPo�e To�wrs� Dept.of Land Use&Transp.
Bonneville Power Administration Tom Highland,P��,��� 155 N.First Avenue
CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO� Routing TTRC—Attn: Renae Ferrera 3040 25th Street,SE Suite 350,MS 13
Planning Director PO Box 3621 Salem,OR 97310 Hillsboro.OR 97124
PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 Steve Conway�ce„�a�n�.�
Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Gregg Leion�can>
�OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) .9D0T,REGION 1 � _Brent Curtis 1cPn>
CITY OF PORTLAND (Notlfy for Wetlands and Potential EnvironmeMal Impacts) 1�Grant Robinson,Development Review Coordinator DOflB M8�@f 8(2CA)MS 14
Planning Bureau Director Regio�al Administrator Carl Torland, Right-of-Way Section�vMar��4� _Sr.Cartographer��,2r.��,.
1900 SW 4`"Avenue,Suite 4100 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders _Jim Nims,s�Naro.�z�,�,s
Portland,OR 97201 Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037
WA.CO.CONSOL.COMM.AGNCY ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A#� _ODOT,RAIL DIVISION STATE HISTORIC
Dave Austin�wcccn�°e��-�,a.�..o...i Sam Hunaidi,Assistarrt Distnct Managar (Notity if ODOT R1R-Hwy.Crossing is Only Accast to Land� PRESERVATION OFFICE
PO Box 6375 6000 SW Raab Road Dave Lanning,s�c��y sar�y sv���� (Nolity if Prop�rty Ha�HD Owday)
Beaverton,OR 97007-0375 Portland,OR 97221 555-13th Street,NE,Suite 3 1115 Commercial Street,NE
5alem,OR 97301-4179 Salem,OR 97301-1012
UTILITY PROYIDERS AIiD SPECIAL A6ENCIES
PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Bur�ington Northem/5anta Fe R/R Predecessor)
Bruce Carswell,President 8 General Manager
1200 Howard Orive SE
Albany,OR 97322-3336
SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS COMCAST CABLE CORP. TRI-MET TRANS�T DVLPMT.
Clifford G Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer�a,�a,auo�s o��Y� Gerald Backhaus,s..�.�.,��,a..��n Qf Pmject is WrtMn%Mile of a Transit RoNe)
5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Ben Baidwin,Project Planner
Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street
Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland,OR 97232
PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY VERIZON QWEST COMMUNICATIONS
Ken Gutierrez,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord. David Bryant,Engineering Florence Mott,Eng.ROW Mgr.
9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue OR 030533/P0 Box 1100 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 11D
Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 BeaveRon,OR 97075-1100 Portland,OR 97219
TIGARDITUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 COMCAST CABLE CORP. COMCAST CABLE COMMUNIC.
Teri Brady,Administrative O�ces Jan Youngquist,Demographics Alex Silantiev,s��.�.,�QA,,.�,�n Diana Carpenter cA�=Ea�.�,a�w,
6960 SW Sandburg Street 16550 SW Merlo Road 9605 SW Nimbus Avenue,Bidg. 12 10831 SW Cascade Avenue
Tigard,OR 97223-8039 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Beaverton,OR 97008 Tigard,OR 97223-4203
� INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT If WITHIN 500'OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY fOR ANY/ALL
CITY PROJECTS (Project Planner Is Responsible For Inditdting Parties To NOtl�y�. h:lpatty\mastersVRequest For Comments Notifcation List.doc (UPDATED: 24-Apr-O6)
PLANNING
SECRETARY
MATERIALS
��
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING -
.... :�
I, Patricia L. Lunsford,being first duyl sworn/affirm,on oath depose and saythat I am a SeniorAdininistrative Specialist
for the City of Tigard,Wastungton C;ounty,Oregon and that I served the following:
�(hd Appn�piaie&�z(s)Bebw}
0 NOTTC� OF DEQSION FOR
SLR2006-10005/TRE2006-00010- LANPHERE ENTERPRISES DRAINAGEWAY RELOCATTON
(File:�Io./Name Reference)
� AMENDEDNOTICE
� Gty of T'igard Plaruung Director
A copyof the said notice being hereto attached,marked Exlubit"A",and byreference made a part hereof,was mailed to each
named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s),marked Exhibit"B",and byreference made a part hereof,on
August 30,2006,and deposited in the United States Mail on August 30,2006,postage prepaid.
� _
- ��
(Pe�on that P pared Nouce�
STATE OF OREGON
County of Washington ss.
City of Tigard
Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the�dayof �� ��- ,2006.
. . �� . . .
�� �f.hylc;ilc.s` �EicEitu4�-".Pd
NOTARY PUaLIG-QREGOF�i
co�nMiss�o(� N0.370��s2
,,�,,^�^,"��'.�,, �-����:�; :.,,: . O ARYPUBLI FOREGON
My Commission Expires:
� EXHIBITA
NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION
SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 2006-10005 '�
:
LANPHERE ENTERPRISES
DR.AINAGEWAY RELOCATION ' � �
120 DAYS = 9/15/2006
SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY
FILE NAME: LANPHERE ENTERPRISES DRAINAGEWAY RELOCATION
CASE NOS.: Sensitive Lands Review(SLR) SLR2006-10005
Tree Removal Pernut (1RE) 'IRE2006-00010
PROPOSAL: The applicant requests a Type II Sensitive Lands Re��iew approval to reroute a
drainageway into an existing drainage ditch. In addirion, the applicant requests a tree
removal pernlit to remove one tree (7"in diameter) in the drainage ditch.
APPLICANT: Peter F. Fry ENGINEER: _'�ndrew Jansky
2153 SW Main Street# 105 3305 SW 87'''Avenue
Portland,OR 97205 Portland,OR 97225
OWNER: Lanphere Enterprises
Attn: Bob Lanphere
12520 SW Canyon Road
Beaverton, OR 97005
LOCATION: 10685 and l 0055 SW Greenburg Road;WCTT�1 1S35BB,Tax Lots 00700 and 00800.
ZONING
DESIGNATION: ML'C: Mixed L�se Commercial District. The ML�C zoning district includes land
around the Washington Square Mall and land immediately west of Highway 217.
Primary uses permitted include office buildings, retail, and service uses. Also
permitted are mu�ed-use developments and housing at densities of 50 units per acre.
Larger buildings are encouraged in this area with parking under,behind or to the sides
of builclings.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.520, 18.630, 18.775 and 18.790.
SECTION II. DECISION
Norice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Director has APPROVED the above request, subject to the
condition below. "l�e findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section V.
NO'17CF,OF'IYPf?II ll]�;CISION
SI.R2006-10005-]..�1VP1 f1�.KF.}?N'17?RYRISI?ti DR:AI�.1(;f;W.11'RI�:I.00.�7'1O\ 1',AGf:]OF 8
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO PLUMBING PERMITS:
Contact the Current Planning Division (Emily Eng, (503) 718-2712) for review and approval:
1. 'I1ze planncr shall cnsure that the plumbing permit submittals are consistent with approved plans for
this decision,SLR2006-10005.
THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS
FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION
SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Site Informarion and Pro�osal Descri�rion:
The applicant is requesting approval to reroute a drainageway located at 10685 and 10655 SW Greenburg
Road (tax lots 00700 and 00800, respecrively). The site is zoned Mixed Use Commercial and located in
the ��icinity of the Washington Square Regional Center. The two tax lots are contiguous and commonly
owned. The applicant proposes to reroute the e�sting drainageway from the north property line of tax lot
800 to its west property line,where there is an existing drainage ditch between the two tax lots,which have
a slope of about 1%. The proposed acrivity would invol�Te: installing a 24" pipe into the existing ditch;
installing a concrete box culvert at the beginning of the e�cisting ditch; replacing and extending a culvert
and installing a permeable rock berm at the end of the e�sting ditch; and remo�=ing �ne tree that is 7" in
diameter. The applicant also requests approval to remove the trees in the drainageway. The owner desires
to reroute the drainageway to use tax lots 700 and 800 as a single site in the future.
SECTION IV. COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET
Staff received letters from two property owners:
Roger Belanich,who owns tax lots 201 and 202 south of the subject site (10763 and 10767 SW Greenburg
Road, respectively), wrote of his concern about how the proposed project would impact drainage on his
properties. Tax lot 202 is adjacent to tax lot 700 of the subject site and is the location of a 7-11
convenience store. Tax lot 201 is adjacent to tax lot 202 and is the location of a gas starion. Both
properries have had a history of flooding during rain storms. Mr. Belanich stated two reasons for the
flooding. First, Fanno Creek backs up into i�1r. Belanich's property, which is on a low grade. Second,
storm water from the subject site unpacts the overall drainage problem. Mr. Belanich recommended that
proposed project include mitigation of the drainage problem in the area.
Res�onse: The project engineer modified the proposal to include on-site detention and a concrete box
culvert to muiimize flooding and increase water flow capaciry. A water flow capacity analysis shows that
the proposed modifications will increase water flow capacity. The modification and results of the water
flow capacity analysis are discussed in Section V of this report.
Joe Gisler owns tax lot 3300 (10585 SW Greenburg Road), direcdy north of the subject site. Tax lot 3300
is the locarion of the SafeGard Mini Storage. Mr. Gisler noted that the existing drainage ditch drains his
facility. He indicated that he supports the proposed project as long as it conforms to the plans he
provided (same as the plans that the applicant submitted to US�CO�). He urged that the existing ditch
and cuh�ert not be abandoned and notes that it also drains the Honda dealership and Office Max, north of
his properry.
NO'1'ICE Ot'"I'YPI�,II llt?CItiION
SI.It200G-10005-L.1NP}i1�12F.I?N'1'E�.ItPRIS1�.S DR.iIN,1Gf;W.AY RI:LOC.1"1'ION PAGk?2O}�8
Res�onse: The original plans have not changed, other than the addirion of an on-site detenrion facility,
concrete box culvert and permeable rock berm. The applicant does not propose to abandon the existing
culvert, but rather replace it, and the existing ditch will be replaced by a faciliry that will continue to drain
Mr. Gisler's property.
SECTION V. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS:
SENSITIVE LANDS
Section 18.775.020.F of the Tigard Community Development Code states: "The Director shall have
the authority to issue a sensitive lands permit in the following areas by means of a Type II
procedure, as governed in Section 18.390.040, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.775.070
(Sensitive Lands Permits):
a. Drainageways;
b. Slopes that are 25%or greater or unstable ground; and
c. Wedand areas which are not regulated by other local, state, or federal agencies and are designated
as si�mificant wetlands on the City of Tigard "Wetland and Streams Cornidors Map."
The applicant desires to reroute a drainageway. Therefore, the applicant's request has been reviewed by
means of a Type II procedure.
DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES
Section 18.390.030.B.2 states that Type I application requirements shall include the following:
a. Information requested on the application form;
b. Responses to the relevant criteria in sufficient detail for review and action; and
c. The required fee.
The applicant has provided matexials requested on the applicarion form and the required fee. Responses to
relevant criteria are sufficient for review and acrion.
IMPACT STUDY
Section 18.390.040.B.2.e states: "The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on
public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the uansportation system,
including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system, and
the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study
shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards and to minimize the impact of the
development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In
situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property
interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirements, or provide
evidence which supports the conclusion that the real properry dedication requirement is not roughly
proportional to the projected impacts of the development."
The applicant's proposal to reroute a drainageway would have no impact on the following systems:
transportarion (including bikeways), parks, drinkuig water and sewer. Little noise unpact is expected to result
from this project. �-�ccording to the LTS Army Corps of Engineers (LJSACOE), the project would affect .009
acres of waters of the L'nited States. rlccording to the City of Tigard Public Works Deparnnent, the project
would 'unpact Fanno Creek, into which stormwater from the subject site drains. USr1COE and Oregon
NO'1'IC1�.(>t�'1'YYi?1]1)1�;CISION
SI.1t2006-10005—L.1NP[II?Rl?I�:N"1'1?RPRISI'sS DR�IN:�GI?WAY REI.00;1"1'ION P��Gti 3 OI�8
Department of State Lands have authorized the project,which does not require a state removal-fill pernut (see
page 5).
Although proposed project may improve drainage on the site, it may have a negarive impact on adjacent
properties,which have had a history of drainage problems because of the area's low grade and overflow from
Fanno Creek. The project engineer has moclified original plans to include onsite detenrion and a concrete
box culvert, which will minimi�e impacts to neighboring properties and increase water flow capacin�. The
project engineer has pro�-ided a water flow capacity analysis, which shows that the proposed concrete box
culvert has 2.5 times the capaciry of the existing ditch. The onsite detention faciliry will minimize flooding on
neighboring properties and a permeable rock berm at the oudet of the proposed culvert will minimi7e
stormwater runoff.
MIXED USE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
The MUC zoning district includes land around the Washington Square Mall and land immediately
west of Highway 217. Primary uses permitted include office buildings, retail, and service uses. Also
permitted are mixed-use developments and housir►� at densities of 50 units per acre. Larger
buildings are encouraged in this area with parking under,behind or to the sides of buildings.
The site has been used for light industrial purposes before it received the �1L C zoning designation. No
changes to the use of the site or to its structures are proposed. The proposed acrivity does not require
compliance to the development standards of the MUC district for the purposes of this Sensitive Land
Review. Therefore, this criterion does not apply.
WASHINGTON SQUARE REGIONAL CENTER
Section 18.630.030 (Pre-Existing Uses and Developments within the Washington Square Regional
Center Mixed Use Districts) states, "...Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 18.760.040, uses
prohibited and structures that would be nonconforming in any of the Regional Center Mixed Use
zoning districts that were lawfully in existence at the time of adoption of the Regional Center Mixed
Use districts are considered to be approved uses and structures. However, future additions,
expansions, or enlargements to such uses or structures, shall be limited to the properry area and use
lawfully in existence at the time of adoption of this ordinance,February 22,2002."
The applicant does not propose changes to the use of the site or its structures. Therefore, this criterion
does n�t apply� f�r the purposes of this Sensirive Lands Review.
SENSITIVE I.�1NDS PERMIT WITHIN A DRAINAGE WAY
Section 18.775.070.D states that the appropriate approval authority shall approve, approve with
conditions or deny an application request for a sensitive lands permit within drainageways based
upon �ndings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied:
The extent and nature of the proposed land form alteration or development will not create site
disturbances to the extent greater than that required for the use.
The applicant desires to use two tax lots as one site, which requires rerouting the drainage way to be
located benveen the two lots. r�ccording to USr�COE and State of Oregon Departtnent of State Lands
(ODSL), the proposed acrivity would not disturb more than 50 cubic yards of material. Therefore, the
proposed acrivity will not create site disturbances greater than required for the use. This criterion is met.
The proposed land form alteration or development will not result in erosion, stream
sedimentation, ground instabiliry, or other adverse on-site and off-site effects or hazards to life or
property.
NO'17CI�:Ot�"lYP}�.II DI?CISI()N
SI,It2006-10005-I.,�I�IPII}?RI�:F?N'I7{RPRISf�,S llR.1IN.AGI�:W:�Y RI:LOC.�1'ION Y.AGI?40F 8
The applicant proposes to control erosion throughout the development process, as indicated on the site
plan and in an erosion control plan (see application file). In addition, the Building Department will
inspect the project area for appropriate erosion control measures prior to issuing a plumbing permit.
Concerning off-site effects to neighboring properries, the project engineer has modified the proposal to
include a concrete box culvert and onsite detenrion to increase water flow capacity and minimize flooding.
The project engineer has also modified the proposal to include a permeable rock berm at the oudet of the
proposed culvert will minimize storxnwater runoff. Therefore,this criterion is met.
The water flow capacity of the drainage way is not decreased.
The water flow capacity analysis shows that the proposed drainageway along with the concrete box culvert
will have 2.5 times the water flow capacity of the e�:isting ditch. Therefore,this criterion is met.
Where natural vegetation has been removed due to land form alteration or development, the areas
not covered by structures or impervious surfaces will be replanted to prevent erosion in
accordance with Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening.
There are three trees in the existing drainage ditch, which will be removed. Two trees are less than 6
inches in diameter and one tree is 7 inches in diameter. A tree removal permit is required for the 7"-
diameter tree. The applicant has submitted an application for a tree removal permit, which has been
granted in this decision (see bottom of page 5 and page 6). The applicant proposes to fill the e�sting ditch
with concrete and gravel. A swale will be planted in the remauung impervious surface areas using erosion
control measures. Therefore, this criterion is met.
The drainageway will be replaced by a public facility of adequate size to accommodate maximum
flow in accordance with the adopted 1981 Master Drainage Plan.
As shown in the water flow capacity analysis, the drainageway�will be replaced b�- a facilit}- of adequate size
to accommodate the ma�imum flow. Therefore,this criterion is met.
The necessary USACOE, ODSL and Clean Water Services (CWS) approvals shall be obtained.
USr1COE has authorized the proposed project, as reflected in a letter dated December 16, 2005. ODSL
has authorized the proposed project, which does not require a state removal-fill permit (see letter dated
October 26, 2005). CWS has approved the proposed project, as reflected in a letter dated September 19,
2005. Therefore, this criterion is met.
Where land forrn alterations and/or development are allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year
�loodplain, the City shall require the consideration of dedication of sufficient open land area
within and adjacent to the floodplain in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. This are shall
include portions of a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway
within the �loodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian bicycle pathway plan.
The subject properties are not located within the 100-year floodplain. There are also no wedands on the
site. Therefore, this criterion does not apply.
TREE REMOVAL
Section 18.790.050.A states that tree removal permits shall be required only for the removal of any
tree which is located on or in a sensitive land area as defined by Chapter 18.775. The permit for
NO'17CI?O}�'I'YP1:II llf?CISION
SI,122006-]0005-1.,�1�iYH1?Rf�.I?N"17?RPRISf�.S DR;�IN,1GI�.W.AY'RI�:LOC�A'17O?� P.AUf?5(�H'8
removal of a tree shall be ptocessed as a Type I ptocedure, as governed by Section 18.390.030,
using the following approval criteria:
Removal of the tree must not have a measurable negative impact on erosion, soil stability, flow of
surface waters or water quality as evidenced by an erosion control plan which precludes:
a. Deposits of mud, dirt, sediment or similar material exceeding 1/2 cubic foot in volume on
public or private streets, adjacent properry, or into the storm and surface water system, either by
direct deposit, dropping, discharge or as a result of the action of erosion;
b. Evidence of concentrated flows of water over bare soils; turbid or sediment-laden flows; or
evidence of on-site erosion such as rivulets on bare soil slopes where the �low of water is not
filtered or captured on site using the techniques of Chapter 5 of the Washington Counry Unified
Sewerage Agency Environmental Protection and Erosion Control rules.
The applicant has submitted an erosion/sedimentation control (ESC) plan that precludes the above. In
addition, the Building Department will inspect the project area for appropriate erosion control measures
prior to issuing a plumbing permit. Considering there is one tree over 6 inches in diameter (out of three
trees total), the site is flat (about a 1% slope) and erosion control measures will be in place, inspected by
the Ciry and maintained by the contractor, removal of the tree is not expected to have a measurable
negarive impact on erosion, soil stability, flow of surface waters or water quality. The ESC plan is
summarized below:
The ESC plan indicates that clearing limits shall be flagged prior to construction and no disturbance
beyond the flagged clearing limits shall be permitted. The staging area will be protected by an erosion
control fence using stakes and filter fabric. The ESC facilities will be inspected daily by the contractor and
maintained for proper functioning. The plan states that at no time shall more than one foot of sediment
be allowed to accumulate within a trapped catch basui. Catch basins shall be cleaned prior to paving;
however, the cleaning operation shall not flush sediment-laden water downstream.
Therefore, this criterion is met.
SECTION VI. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS
Thc City of Tigard Public Works Department has reviewed the proposal and offered the following
comments, summarized below:
Eric Hand, Wastewater and Stormwater Supervisor in Public Works, wrote a memo expressing his
concerns related to the drainage problem in the area. First, Mr. Hand was concerned that installing the 24
inch pipe is not adequate to address the drainage problem and will reduce water flow capaciry. Second, he
noted that while the proposed project is to install the 24 inch pipe, the applicant indicates future work
involving the rerouting of the existing 36 inch ODOT pipe south on the east side of tax lot 700. Third,
i�Ir. Hand noted that stormwater from the subject site flows downstream into a wedand at 10770 SW
Cascade Avenue. This wedand, which is privately owned and not maintained by the City, is silted in
causing storm water to back up into the subject site in the winter. L SACOE and DSL permits would be
required to perform any site work at the neighboring propern•. Mr. Hand made the following
recommendations:
1. The subject property owner should construct both parts of thc projcct at the same time (install 24
inch pipe, as well as install 36 inch pipe with water qualiry faciliry along the south of tax lot 700)
2. The owner should address the drainage problem on the 7-11 site.
3. City staff should conduct a downstream analysis regarding water flow capacity and impacts to the
NO'1lC}'.OI�'t'YPt?II D1�,CIS1OI�
SLR2006-10005-1,:�NPf f1�;R1?1�.'.�i'1'I�.RI'RISN:S llR.A[ti.�Gl?W,AY Ri�.I.UC:1"1'I()I� P.1GI?G(�I�8
downstream areas, including the wetland at 10770 SW Cascade l�aenue before issuing an approval.
Res�onse: Because the exisung ditch and offsite wedand are on private property, the above
recommendations may be recommended but cannot be required as conditions of approval for this
decision. Staff conducted a site visit with the project engineer and the project engineer agreed to modify
the original proposal to mitigate off-site impacts. The modificarions include the addition of a concrete box
culvert, onsite detention and a permeable rock berm, as discussed in this report. Per Public Works, the
proposed modifications are suitable.
SECTION VII. AGENCY COMMENTS
The LTS 11rm5- Corp of Engineers ha��e reviewed the proposal and stated that the proposed pxoject would
require its authorization.
Res�onse: The applicant has already received L�Sr'�COE authorizarion in a letter dated December 16,
2005.
SECTION VIII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION
Notice: Notice was mailed to:
�i The applicant and owners
� Owner of record within the required distance
� r�ffected government agencies
Final Decision:
THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON AUGUST 30,2006 AND BECOMES
EFFECTIVE ON SEPTEMBER 14, 2006 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED.
�A eal:
The D�irector's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons enritled to norice or who are
othenvise adversely affected or a�m eved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal
this decision in accordance with �ecrion 18.390.040.G.2. of the T�� ard Communiry Development Code which
provides that a written appeal to�ether witli the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10)
business days of the date the Nonce of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available
from the Planning Division of Tigard Cit��Hall, 13125 SW Hall BouIevard,Tigard,Oregon 97223.
Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be
confined to the specific issues idenrified in the written comments submitted by the parries during the
comment period. Addirional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of r�ppeal may be
submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be
adopted from time to ttme by the appellate bod��.
THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON SEPTEMBER 13, 2006.
NUTICF.OF T'1'I'E lI Dl�,(;Iti1UN
SLR200G-10005-I.��NY[If�:RI�.1�;NTI�.RY121SI:S llR:AI'_��1GI�,W.�Y'lt1?LUC:.1'1'1Oti P.AGI?7Of�8
uestions:
If you have any quesuons, please call the Ciry of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard Ciry Hall, 13125 SW
Hall Boulevard,Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171.
- �
rlugust 30,200G
REPr1 . y Eng D1�TE
ssistant Planner
' '�" August 30, 2006
APPROVED BY: Richard H. Bewe ff DATE
Planning Manage
NO"I'ICl?OF"I'1'I'F.II DI?CISIO\
SLR2006-10005-1..�IvYf[1�;Ri?1?V'17�:RYRISI�.S DR.A1'.�.AGIiW.Al'121�:LO(:.1"flOti l'.AGt{8Ol�8
m - - - _ . • - .
�Z GEOGRFPHIC INFORMAiION SViTFM 'i
�% LOCU I
-� VICINITY MAP
�
$ __________
�
a - SLR2006-10005
LANPHERE
ENTERPRISES �
� � � DRAINAGE WA
g RELOCA'I"ION
m
`\
� t���F��FkKH
—_.._ ` �1�� �
I �a� ' �,
— —---- � � -� eqnrt�� o
-�� 1�
.� - /— s'RD ,./
-AVE HADfY . �N V� -,��
� � � -� I Tgard Area Map
� I
)SO T J�� N
-- -- �_�
�
SOR PL (g o ioo zoo aoo aoo soo Feel i
1"=389 feet
000 00°000°00 �i .4
o°oo 00 0
0000 00�0 =
oo°oo°o°°O
0000 -W
o >
• Q -
—_.I ____. _
- - - Infortnalion on this map is for generel location only and
o shoultl be verified with the DEVelopment Servites Division.
' °oo0 13125 SW Hall Blvd
o°o Tigard,OR 97223
° - ' �i (503)63&4171
--- . ' � I . hltp://ww.v.ci.ligard.or.us
Community Development Plot date:May 24,2006;C:lmagic\MAGIC03.APR
�iTY` G� �'iGAR1�
/�D�!01�P(j ....._.._..'-".'................"••'-"-'--""-""".......--'. � 1
::ur�c?itionally Approved............_._.___._._..--_-.- � ;
.,. .
LANPHERE ENTERPRISES '=ERMIT NO. _____ � re�
�;ee Letter to: Follow..........._....._......._......_..--_ [ ; �
" � CULVERT REPLACEMENT Attach............... _...............( ; � �
; r .�ddr�ss: -- �
� _ ___� � ' ' -.= 10685 SW GREENBURG ROAI� �---------,��,R -�-^� -.� b w om �
_ S ALLEN � . \/_
� "�`I TIGARD OREGON " w °W Z
' [�- -�-� - r .�. `-l__l- w o
� y � _ _�W
7. (n o�'o
1 EW UEHM [1.11 W �f�/�
SW W�qT � 'r�SW M�NOMAM
�-� - -�. � � k� 1� �r�; _ -
" y ��� "�-, SENSITIVE LAND REVIEW SUBMITTAL ~ a��
o_ �
� ''� ° SITE LOCATION a ~ m�~ �
I � ��..:- �I f� ^
�,<s
5W BRO M0.M � i^ l. W
�� -r�t . 3�,�,1 � L �
=I c 217 << I !�cB
�I � � T
3 r,l� � � i �'m�� #o���
� -��`F l � �,���y� ' / GENERAL NOTES
'J �, �T ,,,,�,,,,: � ml CONSTRUCTION NOTES ���p
�I j � � � v �u ncv�nas Mc a�sm a,w�ssa[o uirnwrr un►i n 9aw w rux +. nE caxmacme s�ui ea�[srowsaz ra oEVwna wn a�su ar
, � SMRT. OOSTIIC A4.CINIlS.S10EMAU(5 AMD DTIER 41E FIFNEI113 MTNN TIE 91E ARFA
2 ST�lI01N0 6 lAYG 1IP011 fA11F71U1E IMFS OTEJI'MSE NO1ED. ���'Mf tl1RM ArO 40EYINKS 9NN1 BE IIEPUCm TO/IFMI d11fi1K
�� -- � F��--,gl � �,�a�,�
.. 9 � . i �u cawsnaicna,v/o wntvnK vuu ca�raw ro n�rw's Wo m[�a �
. .. � . _ �is a nc ian a�mau awia usvxr ru�uuw cmc uo 1 51B(lRAOF AW iRflICN BAQ611 91NL!E COYPAGiED/U AT lGST ru cs n4
--, ' .._ ' ica�oems av nc an ar norw wsc�T o[sia sruo�ux rwauy onr o[�n,�s ocicnwHm ar tisn o-e�n rtmwa m.crnw nc
4 J��IP .-
I 3 e
f� 0 N I """� e�aaiam mo'acs Mn�ru�me�s nor roMrno. p
�� �W -_ .. . s. nc m�wnm�sru.una�suu wrraw ro ui�rnrwsa rmniw sr�h.�wo �
. : � �acw.canfz armwur�s uio ecaunas w,iaa icass�Rr vtpris�vo a cus swu x n�rtn w o•-iz•wos[uns�uc caw�cico m�arr ��
�xnan�awim er n�[�wn�ann[s. ocNSn ar�r�c�r oex ov n�c uowi[n rnxia r�wuy arv owar 1 I
LOCATOR MAP ' ,��,�""`"�,��"�«'9���°�,",�,��"'"°,�,�
(�sTMO-ew>Mnir euxdwo uw wnai z'o[vm or rar r��T gcnaK
w�wm n�[onarn. •. snMr��rt"v'"�e rw�[erEnic�a�n u�an�.�o[ro�nrz sroro��wo
e. atav�Trns�usr caiv�r v�m�u rnoNSans ar ans�s�.s�i ro�m.e�rc�aun+o
Iq161CA1qN Of ML PpitWENT CONPANI6 p1 AGfHCl6 Of UNOfAtlId1N0 U11lITE5 W a S�MGVT S1R/JOHT Y�1tlIll1E5 1p CR[AlE A!UR JOWT B[11�.p1 pOSiW
O� TE PRO.CCT�REA�T lEAST�B BUSNIE4-DAY Hd1pS�1T NOT YOR[iM1H 10 PAKYENT�ND NEW PAKIpIT.
; BU51LS5 P�YS,50 TIAT S�p UTUilES Y�Y BE ACLIIR�IFLY LOC�1F➢B[fORE
� COWEML]MC�MY IXC�VAMIN. 6 CON1RAClOR�l1ALL PIFWIT SDIIIF1115{Adl d1Fa110 M S101tll ptAN�OE
pp MIEY.
1. TIE LM�11011 Of E%ISiN1G IIfOEMO1pMD UR1116 9qW1 p1 M PUMS R ip1
4 WfOR11ATl'RI dILY ANO 5 NOi 0.1MAMTEm Tp 9[COWI[I[p1 ACp1RA1E.CONIRACTp! ). MiUSi Nl MCO(HiAL SiRUCTIR$Y/JNIQ(�p5,y/iL�(9plSg,[TC 1p
CO l." R: 511ALL YERfY EiFV�iNM�S.AK 93E.NIO IMlE11U�1 T1PE Oi ILL NiDERp1pNID ununcs rnaim a�u.
N 9m
PRIM i0 C011YFNCWG NIIM CON511tl1CMIN�VD 9U11 MMfi AMY DISCF�ANd6 R1 TIE
�' � �TIEMTDN Of iLOWHC SOLUlqxS.]]NOURS PMOR 1p S1MT Of COHSIRUCPdI. 6 INTE�LILS.TIKNCII EItUV�TI�I.PIPE UYUIG NI➢MLI6RL EMfAV�T�
I,� L41LL
0. TIE ENONEEA OR OW�ER IS NOT I1ESVp14B1E Fpl TIE SIiFTY Of IXE Cd11RACTdf OR f, TK CbITRACTOt S�MLL PROVfOE NL lNTERIKS Mm lAq!TC fARETE
WS OIEW.NL O.SM.I�.NEGIMiX1f15 91ALL BE SIItlCRY MIEAFD 10 M TME TIE WIN FOt i�E SipRll TEVER�T T!E LOGTipd,SIIES MID TYPES AS � � �
4 %�~ L PF%pNAMQ Oi TE 110RK. LGVM W i1E PL�wS. STUM SEVERS LIMLL�E UID IN 1M1E ALYNdT PI
U ' `� •ptY PIPE TREICN'CDDEO'Tp TIIE pE��IL/S SIbVN OI TK P�NQ.Pp[ � �
� I - 0. 7EIPa1MY Nq PEAWMEMT ERamW CpI1110L 1(.W/IES]III11![Ugy IS IEEpm. L�YING 9MLl KGIM AT TIIE LOV PNNT�TIE SYLTEM Nm Pq�[ED �
Y. TE COMiRMTM 41NL A014AE 1D OlY Or IIWIlOI A4 KCCffiMY fd1 FAOSIOM UPGRME VITN SP[GOT ENDS POIMT�(i IIPfFhOE. �
= COM1110L 11EASiMES 1 C
16 PanD11't,plO11GE�.VfJ PIDE Nlp IITTI�Gi SINLL CpfOM TO KTM 1
C `� '� 10.TE OONl11AClOR B ME�OMSBIF fOR YNITMINO NL IIp1pMYy�(FETNp 71[y pEµ 0]0]{Spt]S.TIE JOINTS 511M.L IE flLl![RE VITN ElGST01ERlC tG115
O ANp f11�Of CON51R11CMf!Y�1FfiAL4 ND p(9Mg,Np qp�plq N[CQy�pT plSi COKOIMIIG TO ASTM D-3212 N!0 ISTN�I]].CWTII/iCTd!SIMLI PMPJIOE
16 �������. fITTINGS MID TNM1SI11�1 COPLIWS COIIP�TIN.E VIiN KV IJ1D ENISTIKi
� !+_ _ ` T .. .� SiOM PIPINL�S KCCSSNIY.
� ✓�� . 11.Bffq1E BAd[i1LLlq MIY AIBW/M UMItt MPIIO�EYEN74 COII111/�Clpt lO SUR�EY MID
�} 11. RECORO YCASVREMdTS OF IXACT LOCAlIOH NIO GfPTI. �
� ' Ws.� �'0 1L IIIEiS SIG1L0�E CONSTRUCTE➢IN TIE IOC�iIONS,ELEV�TIOIS IJID
12 NL PGW15 ANO UCEM56�MT IM TK CIQq1Tp1�Vlp Cpl'1E71011 01 MMK UIIEI$IUR K SIQJN W TXE PLNS INLETS SIMLL BE SET PIUMp TO LIIE
'O \ \•`� � I - IR. SHALL BE SEWRED BY TIIE LONIRACTOR PNOR TO W1114NCIN0 CQ151RUCTdi. �MC f/t/iGE MIO SNKL IIEST OI�LMCfILLY fR�p[p.I1NIfOR11 KMING M4E.
O ....... MM�E fRMIE NI��JERS SINLI IE CAST-@p11 CUISTNUCiIOH�S
j 1 - 1]l6qK COMMENCWO�SIRUCTOII M COMiRAtTd1 91NL NOTFV ALL PERI�EHT SPECIfiC0.
f �� COYP�N[S pl AOENLIES W1H UN�ERp11qX0 UTIIIIES N TIE PRQLCT ME�50 TUT
p �"- UN ERp
D 'r - �\ i1 S/p U111R]WV BF ACCURARY IAUIED. IL TRNI.II fONMTIIY fNALL C E%GV�TEO TO fU1T�KE SUKiMC[IIm
'� IA TE 1OG111N1 OI Ef151M0 UME�tltOUIO V1lIR3 AqMI pI TE RANS R fpl LII�CFAOC MIEIi1W�TId�IMY�K AEWIREO WGCR Q�OT[ONIG�L EIXDIILE�R.L
t Mfp1Y�TON dlY AM b NOT UIMANIEE➢10!E ACGIMAIE. POTIOIF Nl QOS9N05
tA AS KE(ffiIJtY RldlE CO15M11CIq1 1p q1(�ENT qtApE Nq N1p11[)!T NMIlC1S
♦N
O
`y '� _._` _Y ,,' 10.COYYENONO Wlll COMS1RUC710M��MD AMLL lRNN:�NlY�dSq1EP�NpES TO 111EnAT1ENTOH
> I ./ I � 1D. OF RO'MNO 90LVlI0NS �
4' r C � y`� 10. 1!.MJ15T NL N1CI�ENTAL SiRUCTIES Y�MKKE UDS.VAL�4 BO%E5.ElG TO pIME
d
G/i i '�n — Il.CONtlKiAS4A[lllE MF�W9BlJtt F7RCM DE9p1 AM PFOOUCT�PF%110YIJIfE TE
.� � wuu cwrxcsvyc smdcn�rart n�cwn-Faw*(ze)wn vwi e[�,aoo rouos
vw
n — J i j rtn sawia�w.cwa¢ic suu ee au�w ca�auwkc rn�ra�cnar wo
C [ 11. RFCQIIENO�IIq15 Oi M�YFAIf/JI CpIpE1E MSTNiF.
O
j ie.rman ro rurnoir a onmbco w�e.nrt emiwc aw��cc suu x aFUEn.n�
EP0.YY RE9N BONDING�fENT 41N1�MPIIED Tfl TIE ML INDM Of TIE COHTACi
y 10. SURi�tC IN STtlCT CONFORII�N(E M11N illE MNNFACNIKKS INSiRUCiN7Ni
� V I C I N I TY MA P 19.SAMq1T 51RNqIT MATQIIIHES 10 CNG1E A b1TT JqNT BflMEEN THE E)OS11N0 P�YEdENT
� lY. /JiD TIE NEW P��.ELFNT.
n
w '1Q T1E CONiRACTOR K RE�ON'AF Ipl DEMW110l1 OF EfO51N0�.G.f]M�lS SbCW1iU4
/ IJ10 011ER 91E EIFlIEN15 WTMM M Ppq[CT M[A r
i
/
�i y
g —..�--�-��. � N e�
_ � Q �
.� c� r
q..,•.� w �
�
> om �
� zW z
W °x��
� o��
SW CASCADE AVENUE ' ADJACENT � ��o
� ' L❑T N❑T IN �. a�Q �
- WORK AREA cA m�F
e
k
��E�
�`°es
EXISTING � �t�!
BUILDING �� – �
APPR�X 30,OOOSF �
. . __. � ._sor_,r� 2s:.�s
._.
ny -;.r �. � .,.
EXISTING A/C y m ��
N❑ CHANGES � 11
PR❑POSED ,
�
AREA=45,OOOSF ;
s
v
� rn
4 S� __._
0
�z
c�
o � �
�
° � �
a y
= CULVERT �� �m �� � e 5
REPLACEMENT �� D~
i ARE �� �� ;
o -
U
o �
a I
c I
r WORK AREA SUBJECT T❑ i i
° SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW �
� IMPACT AREA=2500 °`m ,8 <y g
� �Z I _ $
m �o
o CONSTRUCTI❑ �� ADDITIDNAL SITE AREAS
„ STAGING AREA n� N�T SHOwN, NO WORK
� AC❑RDING T� ' =z PROPpSED�
a APPROVED ER�SI�N _ +�o __ �07 T❑ EAST= 89,700SF
— --__
� CONTROL PLAN D m - __ -- —__��__ _ EXISTING BUILDING= 17,735SF
� n.. - ----- :
i m tn •�'�`a —�po ' _
� y 4
�� � ���
�;
�
�� EXISTING BUILDIN , ° �
�� � q
�
b.� ,� ° a�
om g
:DCr�.� ' xim.� z W
Z
'!I „ �. I ¢ o��
XISTING XISTING SCALE VAUL ❑UTFALLT❑ w oNQ
�
t N:4723.0790 �''��
;�I CULVERTS t000�.ai8o �' PR❑PERTY � F- Wo� g
T: PK z im.s xioes (n m.-F
� ° scr,�c x�an
9).3 til � x102D �
�' 'W i X�oz.3 x�ms �m�s
��t PR❑TECT POLE � v`", '°''' A/C o ��?�
.II 4 9)6�___-------'—_�� . VI .
i n
�Sc n}:^s.9 .}X9i.n ..... .. ___ _ .. . %e'°ls.=---�-__..._._.� 8
g�Ca�E
___
� '----�
- (J~� vo,?a --.-,.-.-__. �,z " W 2AP��
___ "
r. , �� � xese� ...f .. ------�?(wu-,-..._,_-.�_�_ v�i
; � -- ,. --- _ ., xs%i --��---�-�— �ws v�
�� � � ; _.-� �� .___._._..._ ,� ._.....�__.'---- yys Xsaa � .X . .__�--
t0o �"_"-.------..-�
, -�_ __ -.-JC � ' �
_�uGa-
; '.--___ i .9
.. - -1-_'-_�._—___` X9Ba - .� �
i. ----�.-___.._ .100_._'-` � �
;. -.T....__. XIL�» IOE3 X9&3 «.P ' �
HAIN— NK ' �� �-�. ___,__ �-:-_ _ �.38 �1
EXISTING DITC �
0 20 4 � �,
� SENSITIVE LAND REVIEW AREA PLAN VIEW TREE
� CW�RK LIMIT LINE) Scole: 1" = 20'
4
�
0
o � g 6
U
o � � �
a
`o � 5
° CrossSectlon-1 CrossSection-2
m
'0 120.0 120,0 120.0 120.0 t
�
i
0
j 110,0 110,0 110.0 110,0
� 1 .5' 1 4'
0
0 100,0 100,0 100,0 100.0
� `V H W o �
� 90,0 N 90,0 90.0 N HW 90.0
�
�
�
'L p p
o OO,O OOrO SO.O OO,O
U
..�i
� SECTION 1 SECTION 2 �
N S
/
ci
� BOX CULVERT END, PR❑VIDE GRATE �� �' � � �e�p
,c,� �� IE=+/-97,5 °,
„., C❑NTRACT❑R x��� �
T❑ FIELD VERIFY &
AFTER EXCAVATION DITCH INLET � �
SAW CUT A/C N:4723.0790 N S E +/E 99.5 � zZ Z
BOTH SIDES :.taoo�.aiso , ; � _��
�OiNT:PK Z �ms Xwsa x�ae.e � z�'�
u ' �a t�� � �`"" C❑NNECT SC LE DRAIN x,op, x,�� a ��3 0
• s REM�VE EXISTING 'N EW CU VERT Z �°�• � � a�¢
DUCTILE CULVERTS� �
; ,�'„ 90 LF 3X6 B�X CULVERT °X,�, � m°�
'"°"----- -- S=0,0069 APPR❑X, p'� '=
_____- ---__—_ � i,, , r
� — .. ---,.�..___ �„ s
'� q . -- x""-------
i ___ , _,�
---- � . ��6�
^ -- , --Xw�a_--.c vJ
-� ' � : . � .�_ .. O —_�--_
, .. „ �--- —;—�----�—__ ----,..�.�wua_._. ..�� ��dBB
DEFLECT BOX REMOVE ---- _ ---_ —. oo..T.-_��_. -`
CULVERT BUSH/TREE ACCESS MANH❑LES _��--� '' ' '�` , �p�e
AS REQUIRED C�NCRETE FIELD � ` ���
RIP-RAP OUTFALL INLET, C❑NNECT 100LF SEPARATI❑N
CLASS 2 ❑DOT WITH 4' 3034 PIPE REM❑VE TREES 0 20 40 60
3 TYPICAL .`
REM�VE/REL�CATE Scole: 1"= 20' ��1
EXISTING FENCE
; PLAN VIEW
�
�
s
0
o � �
�
o � � �
0
o �
L
C
mCrossSectlon-2
� CrossSectlon-1 120.0 120,0 c
� 120,0 120.0
i A -GR VEL tlo,0 A 110.0
� iio.o iio,o i 4•
€ 1 .5'
� 100.0 � 100.0
100,0 100.0
% N O �
HW N HW
� 90,0 90.0 90.o P �PO ED 90.0
.a P �PO ED C LV RT
o C LV RT so,o eo.o
q 80.0 80.0
U
-.�
� SECTION 1 SECTION 2 r
� .
�
�
CRAVEL � ���l/
f°-'�"'�'-'�I � EXIST.A.0 � DETEC7ABLE WAPNINC TME �
�
� N� �
INLET FRANE I �u=.... ' _' ' � �
!CRATINC � �
I BOX BACKFlLL , r: E%IST.A.C. �m �
` I -_ _ . . _ -_-= I :r. - Jk v 6 R CONCREIE BO%CULVER7 p W�
`__ BEDqOINC =��
RIM� 5000 P51 ._.�__ . �-_ � _ - . CRUSHED ROCK m Y-MINUS J �3 O
ADJACENT A/C CONCRFlNISH ���:.. � FWR�ON Q K{y1�
� ECEOlEX71LET � > �
SURFACE (AS-REWIRED ��Q�p� W Q�¢
__. ._._._. _.� .... _..�. ,-:� A�_�. ,_.,� _.._. BY GEOIEpI) B• FlELD m� p
6'
..ti �.I MIN. MIN. �SpECTON � F v
..t -�. � f-�
12' �:.t �` N47ES S
wN_� 1. lY PAVENENT SECTION-I�AC OYER!'COYPAC7ED CRAVEL
_ , ���e#
; �E_�" / �.•` �+� �'I 5 BOX BEDDING & BACKFILL `�6
� �� +� �t�!
/w _ `,i�
I
_ � ' ' �_ �
' ��� I E � t Y� '' �A`
. r
� . :'. . , ,. . ; ..
� -.- — -- - -I �� e I . . � . • �I 4�1
1 �6• � 8ft 8' �
- * 1` rouNO�nar� -- -- �� ��� ,�
Flu `-
o, NOTES:
� 1.CONIRACTOR TO NIDEN IXCAVAiI(M!AS REp11RED TO OBTNN CONPAClION
MI7X CANiRACTIX25 COMPACTION Ep/PNENT.
� /O�
o z DITCH INLET ���Hanson
' S .s N.�n�.a nea�ae.
i�su sr ii�n���
nw.acaa1��ax
w� nx-aw
f.Ut IbS)N3-JI)] � t
u
S
0 4�SPIGOT � � y 5
c
[
° SHEET NOTES: 8'x 3'BOX CULVERT
m
O �
� PIPE SHALL BE H-25 RATED BOX CULVERT BY HANSON PIPE � �' t
� MANHOLE ACCESS TO BOX CULVERT SHALL BE PROVIDED EVERY 100 FT ea•
° FOR ACCESS AND CLEANING. � 6'-a•
�
o � tx' Y
o TEMPORARY FIELD INLETS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR GRAVEL PARKING
�
DRAINAGE.
>
o a
°' � R Q a
n y �
� 1.5'BELL
�
•L
n
a
� $�DE VIEIY � �
U
�
��� MANHOLE ACCESS POINTS NOT SHOWN
n
„ � BOX CULVERT H-25 LOAD ;
� 5 �.
m 4
EROSION CONTROL PLAN NOTES
WATER BYPASS RECOMENDATIONS � � ��
ATTApI FlLTER
FABRIC TO STAKE$ M�P��SEN�T TO pWSP�M�SI��w d A ORPI MAS4 STIMlEG1' J a
1. �PPIIWK Of M9 E11090H/AD�4,NTA710N CONiR0.(FSC)ItN1 OOES NOt �
CQ,STNIE IN MPROVK Oi PERYNIEN7 ROAD pf ptIJNAfE DE941!(E4.93 AIO A KTLPT�KE IETIIODS MLUOE.EITI[k PUpU1G pl fA�VITY fIOV O � t
IETIqDt.TEIVpUTY KRMS/STRLCTIIYEi INY�E NEOIl111EQ S
LDC�TON Oi AOMS RESIRIC10M5 CMN1MF15 REIENTCN iMUT�.S.UT111R5.ElC). Y�2�WJ00 POST OR • W-PAfS SINLL K SIZE➢!OR TYPIGL SIMER ROVi N � Y
2 T[�PIFIENTAININ Of T43E 6C RANS MID 111E C(1151RUCiqN.MM/RM�NCF. FlL7EX FABRIC S1E£L FFNCE POST C W TIE CASE��LMfL R�111 EVCNi COHTRA[ld!IMY�E REWIIIED LL C�
IIE➢LACEMENT.NO WCRAOMG Ci TKY ESC F�q1111E5 6 TIE RF�p199RlTT Of T[I PI�P VOiK NfFA KTEN EV[NT P�SSES TO Cb1TIM1E VOM. � �
M CaNiR/�C1a11 uN11L u1 CoMSlRUC11aN IS WMPIEIm Iw MPROYFD N10 REpIFORdNC NETMIG a�
BAG6l1 E�DCITIOKIL PMIp1TIW ppCK TO STNLLRE fqNW1�IPl NtG U1 TIE Z �
PE]IY�NENT�EOETA110M/UMSLAPNIO IS ESTABLIAm. AS REWIREU O �m 2
1RENCH � �� CASC�Nlpl V�TEp IS TIC NESP�/SI�0.1TY 6 TIE CpITRM1CTpf. ZZ
1 M lOUNDMRS OI M flEM1110 WIlS 51101N1 ON lIK PIAN 91A11 BE QF.1RY w
n�aom w nc rru neon ro cwsmuana�.ourowo nc mamucnai rum. � � oasr.atd»io („) ���
NO p5N11lANCE BEYOND TE MCOFD f1EARING IlMI1S SMNL BE PEAWTiFD.Th'E ry� 70 STAKES
MGpMG 91ALL BE YAMIT�INED BY TK CONIRACTOR iqi TIE WRA1qN Oi � Z Z��
COMSIRUC11011. � O ON Q
♦. TM[SC f�CH111E5 9101W ON T115 PUM YUST BE C016IRUCIFD M WM�/1HCiqM �
N1M ALL QFARING AMO fAMI4G ACTN1Cv.NO N SLOI�Y/JIIER IS TO EM9AE I
nu.ga�w.un smwwr uocr�w�hx oo rar c�ro�nc w�x�wc ss�n. � iJ � ���
RJA01I�Y5.W NOLAIE�PPl1CABlE NN1FA S�N�ARDS I O y[
0. T1E[SC f�n1T[S 91aw aN MS PuN ANE ME WYIA11EIX1IRFw115 i'dl 6'MIN_ I I� .� I 6'MAK I LL mO F 1�
MIM]P�1ED 91E CQ1pTONS WRMO TIE CONS11X1CTOi PFAICO,111ESE ESC - � w �
fAWllES 41ALL BE UPpIMED IS NfLDFD Kp UNEXPECTED STIMlY EVFH15,WD TO
ENAl11E 1MAT SEpYENT AND SEDYFNT LAOEN WAIFA DO NOT IEAVE iME 91E. y_ , . �� �I�(;�,V� �✓1�..1V �"
p. 1HE[SC i�WTFS 91ALL BE MSPECRl1 DAILY BY TIE COlI1NAClOR A11D YAWTANED E
AS MECESSUIY m EMSURE I11flR ooHiwLlD Fl1qCnowMG NOIE£
). TI[qt FI�OlITES d MAC1M 91E5 9U11 BE NSPECIED AM YMIT,UNEL A 1.M15T/�LLATON SMALL Fp1pW iN[Y�NUFACTIRERS ����
WYWY Of OMfL A YOIITI q1 M1M�ME 31 XOUR3 fOLLOMIG A S101b E�EMT. q[�pyyQ�pATp15.
S. AT NO TME SHMl YORE TIAN dE f00T OF 9VNfNT BE ALLONFD TO ACdINAAIE G6a8
M1THN�iRAPPED LATCH BASN.�1LL L�TCN B�SINS AND C01l1£YANLE IiIES 91ML t.f1L1ER FABRIC-USE MMIMUM OF]E�WIDE Ra�c
BE CIFIJIED PRI011 i0 P�MNG.ME CIE.WNC OPENAMNI SMAl1 N01 iWSM SFD�plT � SE D I M E N T FEN CE ���`
LADbI WAiEA INTD iHE DDVMSTIEAY MiEY. 1
Y. Si�&�ZED Cd�51RI1CTp1[NiRIU10E5 91�LL BE INST�LLED AT TIE BEpWMM OF ,�F�,
CONS1RUCilIX1 AND MAINTNNE�fqi TIE WRAIIp!Qi iHE PROiCCT.ADDITONAL 8
YEASUFES M�Y BE REWNtm 10 ENSURE THAT ALL PAVm ME�S ME KEPT CIENI
fqt iHf�URATON Of T1E VROJECT. �
�� o PLAN VIEW �`�`,
i]l»,1 XIOIJ
� 'I'
; I
� �
� I
4 j BYPASS
° � CHECK STRUCTU'R�Z3.079D
I i000�.aieo
u i �. : PK '°'e x�ua x'�e.s � p
�
� w�" 4 4 ��
a '�4L' xwen X�xa x�me � � �
z � WATER BYPASS � � � s
9] �
° ���9 CB YPAS i
� �(?].7:i°S9 X9/i -_'�_.— " . . �.-__
—�- - X+�� Y DESIGN CK STR E '
u __'_.___ I y�� ;!ml � IBtL_..__. L
a +--�x'�`._'_---ioo � ----�
i __ xm.�_---
-
o j /.'� Y - _-." . XfLI �__ __."_-)fNLL_
� 1 � ,� ...-'--- .-r-------_-__ Xsfa XfYa I00 --__.-.—
�'__..
i __�
.._ .-.r_____.__' _'1(iau—.-._—
/ I
� '� . '. ._,r--_'_�_
. , ___�,-- Xsw ---`
_ _.._ / _.. -__._.
_____'__' 100�_ .� X7L1
L � � . ..--.-�� f ..--
O �..- ._ ... -__
� __ -
� O �O � �
/
m STAGING AREA
'`° PROTECTED BY
i EROSI�N FENCE Scole: 1" = 20'
�
..�
0
a
N
% e
i
/
ti �
� �
EXHIBIT�
Lanphere Enterprises SLR2006-10005
12520 SW Canyon Road LANPHERE ENTERPRISES DRAINAGE WAY
Beaverton, OR 97005 RELOCATION
Lanphere Properties V LLC
12505 SW Broadway
Beaverton, OR 97005
Peter F. Fry
2153 SW Main Street# 105
Portland, OR 97205
Roger M. Belanich
22020 - 17`t'Avenue SE, Suite 200
Bothell,WA 98021
Joel Gisler
1470 N.E. First Street, Suite 150
Bend, OR 97701
� .
q
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING -
I, Patricia L. Lunsfoid, being first du�ly sworn/affiriri, on oath depose and saythat I am a SeniorAdministrative Specialist
for the City of Tigar�d,Wasl�ungton County,Oregon and that I served the following:
{(]xck Apm�pvm&�x(s)&4m�)
x❑ NOTTC� OF PENDING LAND USE DEQSION FOR
SLR2006-10005/TRE2006-00010- LANPHERE ENTERPRISES DRAINAGE WAYRELOC'.ATION
� AMENDED NOTICE
(Fik NoJNarne Reference)
� City of Tigard Planning Director
A copy of the said notice being hereto attached,marked Exhibit"A",and by ref erence made a part hereof,was mailed to each
na�ned person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s),marked Exhibit"B",and by reference made a part hereof,on
May 24,2006,and deposited in the United States Mail on Ma�24,2006,postage prepaid.
; /
(Pe�on that Pre ared �ce)
STATE OF OREGON
County of Washington ss.
City of Tigard
Subscribed and sworn/affirnled before me on the-��dayof �C�d� �� ,2006.
._F� V�i F ir� c.- ..
���J�d�a��E��.
I �� ,� lVOIKr� PUf3�9C�:..
� C�'".'!- ;�� �
i I,rlr�t�'.
NOT Y PUBLIC O GON
My Commission Expires: 2�
EXHIBIT �4
NO�I'ICE TO MORTGAG�E,LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER
Tf-� TIGARD DEVELOPMENT OODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECENE T�IIS NO'IT�,IT SHALL BE PROMI'TT_Y FORWARDED TO
'IT�PURCHASER
NOTICE OF PENDING - - - ��
LAND USE APPLICATION �=
SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW
DATE OF NOTICE: May 24,2006
FILE NUMBERS: SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW(SLR� 2006-10005
TREE REMOVAL PERMIT �TRE 2006-00010
FILE TITLE: LANPHERE ENTERPRISES DRAINAGE WAY RELOC'.ATION
PROPOSAL: The applicant,is requesting Sensitive Lands Review approval to reroute a drainage way. The
proposed activirywould also involve replacing and e�ending a culvert. The site includes two tax lots,
wluch are commonly owned. The applicant proposes to move the e�sting drainage way, which
currently separates t� lots 00700 and 60800, to the east property line of tax lot 00800. The owner
desires to reroute the drainage way to improve water conveyance and use the two ta��lots as a single
site. A tree removal pernlit is reqwred to remove a 7" caliper tree in the drainage way.
LOCATION: 10685 and 10655 SW Greenburg Road;WGTM 1S35BB,Tax Lots 00700 and 00800.
ZONE: MUC: Mixed Use Commercial District. The MUC zoning district includes land around the
Was � gton Square an an unme iately west of H'ighway 217. Pnn-iary uses pern�itted include
office buildin s, reta�l, and service uses. Also pernutted are mixed-use developments and housing at
densities o f 5�units per acre. Larger b u i l d i ngs are encourage d in t h i s area wi t h par k i ng un der,be h.u l d
or to the sides of bwldin gs.
APPLICABLE
RE VIE W
CRITERIA: The approval standards for Sensitive Lands Review are described in CommunityDevelopment Code
Chapters 18.390 (Decision-Making Procedures , 18.510 (Commercial Zonin Districts), 18.630
(Wash�ngton Square Regional Center), 18.775 �Sensitive Lands),and 18.790�I'ree Removal)
YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS:
Prior to the Ciry making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written
comments on the apphcation to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT
5:00 PM ON iUNE T'H. 2006 . All comrnents should be directed to EmilyEng,Assistant Planner in the Plannin Division at the
City of Tigard,�13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at�503) 718-2712.
ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE
SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
THE QTY OF TTGARD APPREQATES REC�IVING CO1��IlVIENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMIvIENTS WILL
BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WIT�IIN 'IT� NOTTCE OF DEQSION. A DEQSION ON T�-IIS ISSUE IS
TENTATTVELY SCHEDLJLED FOR jLJNE 19, 2006. IF YOU PROVIDE COMIVIENTS,YOU WILL BE SENT A OOPY OF
THE FULL DEQSION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED.
WRITTEN COMIVIENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF 'IT�E PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL QONTAIN
Tf-iE FOLLOWING INFORMATTON:
♦ �ddress the specific "Applicabl� �view Criteria" described in the secri�__ abo�-e or any other criteria belie�red to
be applicable to this proposal;
♦ Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient e�ridence to allow the City to pro�-ide a
response;
♦ Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval
criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue.
Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificiry may preclude subsequent
appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the
relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence.
AFTER THE 14 D_�1'CO�I�1EtiT PERIOD CLOSES,THE DIRECTOR SH_�LL ItiSUE.�T�'I'E II AD:�IINISTR-�TI�'E DECISION. THE
DIRECTOR'S DECISIOti ti�L�LL BE :�L�ILED TO THE r1PPLIC.�NT �:�ll TO OI�NERS OF RECORD OF PROPER"I'Y LOC_1TED
WITF-IIN SOO FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, .�\D TO .��;1'UNE ELtiE VUH(> SL'B�fITTED WRITTE'� CO'�I�IENTS OR WHO IS
OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'ti DECISIO:� SII3LL _�DDR�SS .�LL OF THE RELE�'_-1\T _�PPRO�'_�L
CRITERI.-�. B_�SED UPON THE CRITERL� _�ND THE F.�CTS CONT.�I\ED `�'ITHI'_\ THE REC(>RD, THE DIRECTOR SH.�LL
.�PPRO�'E,.�PPRO�'E WITH CONDITIONS(>R DENI'THE RE(�UESTED PER'�IIT OR�CTION.
SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS:
♦ The application is accepted by the City
♦ Noticc is scnt to property owncrs of record within 500 feet of the proposed de��elopment area allowing a 14-day
written comment period.
♦ The applicarion is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies.
♦ City Staff issues a written decision.
♦ Notice of the decision is sent to the �pplicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners
of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent propert�- tax assessment roll;any
City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is
entitled to notice under an inter�overnmental agreement entered into with the City which includes �rovision for such
notice or anvone who is otherwise entitled to such notice.
INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW:
The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon b3r the Director to make this decision are
contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development
Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of$.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service.
Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Nouce
under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments."
��;; �J. � � ;'[`_ �
���`� , , ,_ ' __________
/ tiLR'.nuGdUUUS
�� — J� I � __________
��.� �� � � � / l. r--L��P}IERE
1\ .� "�-< ENTERPRI�E�
` ��� g� — , DRaI\_�<;E\C:�1
� � - RELC���aTIC�N
�, _J �
�_ _
- ,�-
, �,�
�L
� \ .�; �`11
� ,_ -�� -;� �,
I �., �
_; � ,_�,,��.
� __ ,
� .__ �- ��, �
�'�_,,�--�`��,-"--�� _._... � �
��_--, ` / _�',� F N
� � ���
�� 7 � �� = ��
, y
� �`' I ��'������-:�.
;+--,� ` ` �
�
�, � � �� - �-� � _..
- � ..� _ . ..�..
� \ �
.
� �_.._..._._,_.....
*. � 'J� - «�..M, .'.,�,��u.,w.�a
EXHIBIT�
Lanphere Enterprises SLR2006-10005
12520 SW Canyon Road LANPHERE ENTERPRISES DR.AINAGE WAY
Beaverton, OR 97005 RELOCATION
Lanphere Properties V LLC
12505 SW Broadway
Beaverton, OR 97005
Peter F. Fry
2153 SW Main Street# 105
Portland, OR 97205
1S1356C-00202 1S1358B-00600
BELANICH ROGER M KP VENTURES LLC
22020 17TH AVE SE#200 2519 NW MARSDEN PL
BOTHELL,WA 98021 PORTLAND,OR 97229
1S135BC-00201 1S135BA-02800
I ROG LANPHERE ENTERPRISES INC
22020 17 #200 ATTN: DOUG MEATH
B LL,WA 9802 12520 SW CANYON RD
BEAVERTON,OR 97005
151356D-01200 1 S1358B-00700
BURDICK-FORBES INVESTMENTS LLC LANPHERE PROPERTIES V LLC
BY DONALD C BURDICK 12505 5W BROADWAY
434 RIDGEWAY RD BEAVERTON,OR 97005
LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034
1S1356D-00300 1513566-00800
CARROLL TIGARD LLC LA OPERTI LC
420 NW 11TH ST#1004 1250�
PORTLAND,OR 97209 B ERTON,OR 97005
1S13566-00501 1S135BA-03302
CH REALTY III/PORTLAND MARX ERNEST L&BARBARA R
INDUSTRIAL LLC TRUST
ATTN:ASSET MGR-PORTLAND INDUSTR 2140 VELOZ DR
21Q0 MCKINNEY AVE#700 SANTA BARBARA,CA 93108
DALLAS,TX 75201
1S1356C-00700 751358A-03303
ALTY III/PORTLAND C ERNEST L&BARBARA R
INDUSTR TRUST
ATTN:ASSET MG - LAND INDUSTR 2140 VEL
2100 M Y AVE#700 S BARBARA,CA 8
LAS,TX 75201
1S135BC-00600 1S1358C-01201
CH TY Iil/PORTLAND MBM HOLDING COMPANY LLC
INDUSTRIAL 659 NW PACIFIC GROVE DR
ATTN:ASS R-POR D� INDUSTR BEAVERTON,OR 97006
210 KINNEY AVE#700 �
D LLAS,TX 75201
1S135BC-00100 1S135BD-00200
CONOCOPHILLIPS CO NORED STANLEY D 8 AUDENE C
PO BOX 1539 1650 NW GARFIELD AVE
PA50 ROBLES,CA 93447 CORVALLIS,OR 97330
1 S1356D-00900 151356C-00900
DORR GEORGE/ANNA MARIE TRUSTEES PAULSON LIMIT�D LIABILITY CO
DORR JOHN D& BY RICHARD G PAULSON SR
DORR PATRICK M 1511 NE 150TH AVE
9925 SW 77TH PORTIAND,OR 97230
PORTLAND,OR 97223
1 S135BC-00500 1 S1356D-OOB00
JOHN DURBIN&ASSOC OF OREGON LL PEARSON DENNIS
10770 SW CASCADE AVE 15840 SE TONG RD
TIGARD,OR 97223 CLACKAMAS,OR 97015
1S135BA-00100
PPR SQUARE TOO LLC
BY EPROPERTY TAX-DEPT 108
PO BOX 4900
SCOTTSDALE,AZ 85261
1513588-00500
RAM/CASCADE CENTER LLC
3998 SOUTHPOINTE DR
EUGENE,OR 97405
1S1356D-013D0
SCHAEFER ROBERT M&SALLY J 8�
MILLER GERALD V
BY SHILO INN-WASHINGTON SQUARE
11600 SW SHILO LN
PORTLAND,OR 97225
1S12600-ooaoo
SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO
DEPT 768TAX 62-116A
3333 BEVERLY RD
HOFFMAN ESTATES, IL 60179
iS1358D-01100
SHADY LANE COMMERCIAL BUILDING
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
7720 SW WESTGATE
PORTLAND,OR 97225
1S135BC-00300
UNITED STATES BAKERY
PO BOX 14769
PORTLAND,OR 97214
1S1356A-03300
UNIVERSUS
BY STEVE ECOFF
442 GLENWOOD OR
OXNARD,CA 93030
15135BC-00200
VERIZON NORTHWEST INC
PO BOX 152206
IRVING,TX 75015
, ,
Nathan and Ann Murdock Mildren Design Group
PO Box 231265 Attn: Gene Mildren
Tigard, OR 97281 7650 SW Beveland Street, Suite 120
Tigard, OR 97223
Sue Rorman Diane Baldwin
11250 SW 82�d Avenue 3706 Kinsale Lane SE
Tigard, OR 97223 Olympia, WA 98501
� Naomi Gallucci
11285 SW 78th Avenue
Tigard, OR 97223
Michael Trigoboff
7072 SW Barbara Lane
Tigard, OR 97223
Brad Spring
7555 SW Spruce Street
Tigard, OR 97223
Alexander Craghead
12205 SW Hall Boulevard
Tigard, OR 97223-6210
Gretchen Buehner
13249 SW 136� Place
Tigard, OR 97224
John Frewing
7110 SW Lola Lane
Tigard, OR 97223
CPO 46
16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242
Tigard, OR 97224
CPO 4M
Pat Whiting
8122 SW Spruce ,
Tigard, OR 97223
CfTY OF TIGARD - EAST INTERESTED PARTIES �i:lcurpinlsetupllabelslClT East.doc) � UPDATED: 21-Oct-05
��
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING -
_ ,��
I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first du�ly sworn/affinn,on oath depose and saythat I am a SeniorAdministrative Specialist
for the City of Tigat�d,Washington County,Oregon and that I served the following:
I�k MY^�Pr�m Ff�z(s)Beb.�J
❑x NOTTC� OF DEQSION FOR
SLR2006-10005/TRE2006-00010- LANPHERE ENTERPRISES DRAINAGEWAYRELOCATTON
(File No./Name Reference)
� AMENDEDNOTIC�'
� City of T'igard Planrung Director
A copyof the said notice being hereto attached,marked Exhibit"A",and byreference made a part hereof,was mailed to each
named person(s} at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s),marked Exhibit"B",and byreference made a part hereof,on
August 30,2006,and deposited in the United States Mail on August 30,2006,postage prepaid.
_.
(Person tha d Notice)
STATE OF ORE GON
County of Washington ss.
City of Tigard
Subscribed and sworn/affirn�ed before me on the�dayof �� �� 2006.
�
- OFF{CIAL SF=AL
iffiISTIE J pEERdPl��a
'''' NOTARY PUBLIC-OREG'� ' �Z�
COMMISSIC�:'d0.'3�"
' °,ISSION EXP�� � �.'!' NO ARY PUB OF OREGON
My Comnvssion Expires: �' �-'�
� � EXHIBIT.�
NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION
SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW(SLR) 2006-10005 '�
LANPHE RE E NTE RPRI SE S
=
DRAINAGE WAY RELOCATION
120 DAYS = 9/15/2006
SECTION I. APPLICATI4N SUMMARY
FILE NAME: LANPHERE ENTERPRISES DRAINAGEWAY RELOCATION
CASE NOS.: Sensitive Lands Review(SLR) SLR2006-10005
Tree Removal Pernlit ('IRE) TRE2006-00010
PROPOSAL: The applicant requests a Type II Sensitive Lands Review approval to reroute a drainageway. In
addition, the applicant requests Type I approval to remove three trees (each 7" or less in
diaineter) in the drainageway.
APPLICANT: Peter F.Fry ENGINEER: Andrew Junsky
2153 SW Main Street# 105 3305 SW 87`�'Avenue
Portland,OR 97205 Portland,OR 97225
OWNER Lanphere Enterprises
Attn: Bob Lanphere
12520 SW Cany�n Road
Beaverton,OR 97005
LOCATION: 1Q685 and 10655 SW Greenburg Road;WCTM 1S35BB,Tax Lots 00700 and 00800.
ZONING
DESIGNATION: MLTC: Mixed Use Commercial District. The MUC zoivng district includes land around the
Washington Square Mall and land 'unmediately west of Highway 217. Prunary uses perniitted
include office buildings, retail, and service uses. Also perniitted are mixed-use developments
and housing at densities of 50 units per acre. Larger buildings are encouraged in this area with
parking under,behind or to the sides of buildings.
APPLICABLE
RE VIE W
C�tITERIA: CommunityDevelopment Code Chapters 18.390, 18.520, 18.630, 18.775 and 18.790.
SECTION II. DECISION
Notice is hereby 'ven that the City of T"�ard Community Development Director's desi�nee has
APPROVED the a�ove request. The fuidin�s and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in
the full decision,available at CityHall.
THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS
FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION.
All dociunent� a�id appiicable criteria in che above-noteci file as-e available for inspection at no cost or copies can be
obtained for twenty-five cents (25�) per page,or the current rate charged for copies at the tune of the request.
SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION
Notice:
Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to:
X The applicant and owners
X Owner of record within the required distance
X Affected government agencies
� _ ._ ------ - �
Final Decision•
THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON AUGUST 30, 2006 AND
EFFECI'IVE ON SEPTEMBER 14, 2006 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED.
�A-- D-Deal-:
The D-irector's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section
18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the T"igard Community
Development,Code wIuch provides that a written appeal to ether with the re quired fee shall be filed with the
Director withui ten (10) business days of the date the Notice o�Decision was ma�led. The appeal fee schedule and
forn�s are available trom the Planrung Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon
97223.
Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the
specific issues identified in the wntten comments submitted by the parties du.ring the comment period. Additional
evidence concerning�ssues,properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be subrrutted by any parry durui_g the appeal
hearing,subject to any additional rules of procedure that maybe adopted f rom time to tune by the appelIate body.
THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON SEPTEMBER 13, 2006.
oF�estions:
r inforniation�please contact EmilyEng in the Cityof Tigard Plannin� Division at (503) 639-4171, Tigard
CityHall, 13125 SW HaII Boulevard,Ti�ard,Ore�on 97223,or byemail to EmilvCa?ti�ar�i-ot.���v.
$ ..o.....,....... ...
� s VICINII'Y MAP
� SLR200G_10005
LANPHERE
ENTERPRISES
� DRAINAGE WA
RELOCATION
\�� \��� / � -
�
i
�-_�-
��p ����
�.,.,,w .
.
n
R �W ��-'�' r
������ �
brnyr
T ��R n�im
_ /� I r� wr� _ n _
9 �
L a"r"�i°xn°o,°'v�.' � � _ �',,
AA�A2l3l�0311S •'��•� 'i
� i
�� �1
�Q •°
d °oY
3��°W
��-��--y...,.,.__�.,__�.v _�=�'"°_"-�--
�� �
tl ' � � _
?� = c �
; aga
�I a�� � —
I s
� i:y ,
, �
I } � <
l �_
^^_���i.-+-�._.� MVIMG
- = re � 5 � I
� �
suf�.�+--�'f_
_"— -'-- m,
.m
8
� �§'x a� W�T��
6 _°rc >�� �w� �ai��
Wme „ < �>� � °`
� �_aW�
<�o°g "� y�Q soo�
Z . '^ g„<>3
' < .-�gQ
�<� �"
� „ W=aa <W�
>�
�«
'W
� N
. _ , -
„ AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE
° OF A LAND USE PROPOSAL
. � .
IMPORTANT NOTICE: THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY
A COPY OF THE NOTICE THAT WAS POSTED ON THE SITE.
In the i�latter of the Proposed Land L'se�-�pplicarions for:
Land Use File Nos.: SLR2006-10005/TRE2006-00010
Land Use File Name: LANPHERE ENTERPRISES DRAINAGE WAY RELOCATION
I, Emil� Fng, rlssistant Planner for the Cit� of Tigard, do affirrn that I posted norice of the land use proposal affecting
the land located at � ��" � Qa.•-c1_ �.�'Z(o �� cS� � �Q�.��u�c �
�
W�Z'v�`^ 1 � 3S (�b l a.,.ac , �o-F s Dv�o��- va�c�
and ciici pers�nally post notice of the proposed land use applicauon(s) by means of weatherproof posting in the general
vicinin' of the affected territor��, a copy of said notice being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof,
on the��day of V��. �006.
�
Signature o o e rmed Posting
h:Uo��\pam�\mastcrs\affida��t uf postinR for applicant to pust public hearing.doc
LANPHERE ENTERPRISES DR.AINAGE WAY RELOCATION
SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 2U06-100U5
TREE REMOVAL PERMIT (TRE) 2006-0001U �
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Sensitive Lands Review approval to reroute a drainage
way. The proposed activity would also involve replacing and extending a culvert. The site
includes two tax lots, which are commonly owned. The applicant proposes to move the e�sting
drainage way, which currently separates tax lots 00700 and 00800, to the east property line of
lot 00800. The owner desires to reroute the drainage way to improve water conveyance and use
the two tax lots as a single site. A tree removal permit is required to remove a 7" caliper tree in
the drainage way. LOCATION: 10685 and 10655 SW Greenburg Road; WCTM 1S35BB, Tax
Lots 00700 and 00800.. zONE: MUC: M�ed Use Commercial District. The MUC zoning
district includes land around the Washington Square Mall and land immediately west of Highway
217. Primary uses permitted include office buildings, retail, and service uses. Also permitted are
m�ed-use developments and housing at densities of 50 units per acre. Larger buildings are
encouraged in this area with parking under, behind or to the sides of buildings. APPLICABLE
REVIEW CRITERIA: The approval standards for Sensitive Lands Review are described
Community Development Code Chapters 18.390 (Decision-Making Procedures), 18.510
(Commercial Zoning Districts), 18.630 (Washington Square Regional Center), 18.775 (Sensitive
Lands), and 18.790 (Tree Removal).
Further information may be obtained from the Planning Division �staff contact: Emil� Eng,
Assistant Planner) at 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223, or by calling 503-718-2712
or by email to em�ilv�,tigard-or.gov. A copy of the application and all documents and
evidence submitted by or on behalf of the applicant and the applicable criteria are available for
ins�ection at no cost and copies for all items can also be provided at a reasonable cost.
N�I'ICE TO MORTGAGEE,LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER
TFiE TTGARD DEVELOPMENT O�DE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RE�IVE T�IIS NOTI�,IT SHAII_BE PROMI'TLY FORWARDED TO
THE PURCHASER
NOTICE OF PENDING ,,
LAND USE APPLICATION = � '
SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW � �.�^��
DATE OF NOTIC.E: May 24,2006
FILE NUMBERS: SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW(SLR 2006-10005
TREE REMOVAL PERMIT (TRE� 2006-00010
FILE TITLE: LANPHERE ENTERPRISES DRAINAGE WAY RELOCATION
PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Sensitive Lands Review approval to reroute a drainage way. The
proposed activitywould also uivolve replacing and extending a culvert. The site includes two tax lots,
wiuch are commonly owned. The ap licant proposes to move the e�sting dr�inage way, which
currently separates ta�c lots 00700 and �0800, to the east property line of tax Iot 00800. The owner
desires to reroute the dr�inage way to improve water conveyance and use the two ta�c lots as a single
site. A tree removal pernut�s reqwred to remove a 7" caliper tree in the drainage way.
LOC'.ATION: 10685 and 10655 SW Greenburg Road;WGTM 1S35BB,T�Lots 00700 and 00800.
ZONE: MLJC: Mixed Use Commercial District. The MLJC zoning district includes land around the
Was ' on Square an un�ie � tely west of Highway 217. Primary uses permitted include
office buildin s, retail, and service uses. Also perniitted are mixed-use developments and housing at
densities of 5�units per acre. Larger buildings are encouraged in this area with parking under,behuid
or to the sides of bwldings.
APPLICABLE
RE VIE W
CRITERIA: The approval standards for Sensitive Lands Review are described in CommunityDevelopment Code
Chapters 18.390 (Decision-IVLlking Procedures , 18.510 (Commercial Zonin Districts�, 18.630
(Waslungton Square Regional Center), 18.775 �Sensitive Lands),and 18J90�I"ree Remova�
YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS:
Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written
commenu on the apphcation to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT
5:00 PM ON JLJNE 71'H 2O06 . All comments should be directed to Emil�Eng, Assistant Planner in the Plannin Division at the
Ciry of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard bytelephone at�503) 718-2712.
ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY ?HE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE
SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION-MAHING PROCESS
'I'I� QTY OF TIGARD APPREQATES RECEIVING COM1vIENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COIvIMENTS WILL
BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WIT�-IIN TI� NOTTC� OF DEQSION. A DEQSION ON T�-IIS ISSUE IS
TENTATIVELY SCHEDLJLED FOR jUNE 19, 2006. IF YOU PROVIDE CONIlVIENTS,YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF
T'HE FLJLL DEQSION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED.
WRITTEN COMNIENTS WILL BEQOME A PART OF Tf� PERMANENf PUBLIC REOORD AND SHALL CONTAIN
THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
�
♦ Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" desc�ibed in the section above or any other criteria believed to
be applicable to this proposal;
♦ Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a
response;
♦ Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval
criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue.
Failure of any parry to address the televant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent
appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the
relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence.
AFTER THE 14 DAY COMNfENT PERIOD CLOSES,THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A T�'PE II ADMINISTR�TIVE DECISION. THE
DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCI�TED
WITHIN 5OO FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AIvD TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN CONIIvfENTS OR WHO IS
OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROV.�I,
CRITERIA. B�SED UPON TI3E CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WTI'HIN TEIE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SH.ar.r.
APPROVE,APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PER'�fIT OR ACTION.
SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS:
♦ The applicarion is accepted by the City
♦ Norice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the pYOposed development area allowing a 14-day
written comment period.
♦ The applicarion is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies.
♦ City Staff issues a written decision.
♦ Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners
of record of property located within 500 feet of the site,as shown on the most recent property talc assessment roll; any
City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is
entided to notice under an intergovernmental agteement entered into with the City which includes provision for such
notice or anyone who is otherwise entided to such notice.
INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW:
The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are
contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development
Departtnent. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of$.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service.
Questions xegarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice
under the section titled"Your Right to Provide Written Comments."
i � I «�,i�an�i_ar �
� �L�oo�-lorws '
�__-------_
I ,L�,�IPHERE I
� E.ITERPRISES
I a ��'RELOC_�TION��
I �
�I � _y•,:�� �
�
� �_�� '�i ��
� � � ,...'4 �
,_��:
� ��u' �
,�
� '
� i
0. • I
������ �
nn � i
�
nt a c y �mp
� ' � � � � � EXHIBI
1S135BC-00202 1S135BB-00600
BELANICH ROGER M KP VENTURES LLC
22020 17TH AVE SE#200 2519 NW MARSDEN PL
BOTHELL,WA 98021 PORTLAND,OR 97229
1S135BC-0a201 1S135BA-02800
�OG LANPHERE ENTERPRISES INC
22020 17 #200 ATTN:DOUG MEATH
B LL,WA 9802 12520 SW CANYON RD
BEAVERTON,OR 97005
1 S1356D-01200 7 51356B-00700
BURDICK-FORBES INVESTMENTS LLC LANPHERE PROPERTIES V LLC
BY DONALD C BURDICK 12505 SW BROADWAY
434 RIDGEWAY RD BEAVERTON,OR 97D05
LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034
151356D-00300 1S135BB-00800
CARROLL TIGARD LLC LA OPERTI LC
420 NW 11TH ST#1004 12505 S
PORTLAND,OR 97209 B ERTON,OR 97005
1S13568-00501 1S1356A-03302
CH REALTY IIl/PORTLAND MARX ERNEST L&BARBARA R
INDUSTRIAL LLC TRUST
ATTN:ASSET MGR-PORTLAND INDUSTR 2140 VELOZ DR
2100 MCKINNEY AVE#700 SANTA BARBARA,CA 93108
DALLAS,TX 752D1
1S1358C-00700 1S135BA-03303
ALTY III/PORTLAND ERNEST L 8 BARBARA R
INDUSTR TRUST
ATTN:ASSET MG - LAND INDUSTR 2140 VEL
2100 M Y AVE#700 S BARBARA,CA 8
LAS,TX 75201
1S1358C-00600 1S135BC-01207
CH TY III/PORTLAND MBM HOLDING COMPANY LLC
INDUSTRIAL 659 NW PACIFIC GROVE DR
ATTN:ASS R-POR D INDUSTR BEAVERTON,OR 97006
210 KINNEY AVE#700
D LLAS,TX 75201
1S735BC-00100 1S135BD-00200
CONOCOPHILLIPS CO NORED STANLEY D&AUDENE C
PO BOX 1539 1650 NW GARFIELD AVE
PASO ROBLES,CA 93447 CORVALLIS,OR 9733�
1S1358D-00900 1S1358C-00900
DORR GEORGE/ANNA MARIE TRUSTEES PAULSON LIMITED LIABILITY CO
DORR JOHN D& BY RICHARD G PAULSON SR
DORR PATRICK M 1511 NE 150TH AVE
9925 SW 77TH PORTLAND,OR 97230
PORTLAND,OR 97223
1S1358C-00500 1S7356D-00800
JOHN DURBIN&ASSOC OF OREGON LL PEARSON DENNIS
10770 SW CASCADE AVE 15840 SE TONG RD
TIGARD,OR 97223 CLACKAMAS,OR 97015
, • �
iS135BA-00100
PPR SQUARE TOO LLC
BY EPROPERTY TAX-DEPT 108
PO BOX 490a
SCOTTSDALE,AZ 85261
1S13588-00500
RAM/CASCADE CENTER LLC
3998 SOUTHPOINTE DR
EUGENE,OR 97405
1S135BD-01300
SCHAEFER ROBERT M 8 SALLY J&
MILLER GERALD V
BY SHILO INN-WASHINGTON SQUARE
11600 SW SHILO LN
PORTLAND,OR 97225
1S12soo-oo400
SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO
DEPT 768TAX 62-116A
3333 BEVERLY RD
HOFFMAN ESTATES,IL 60179
7S1358D-01100
SHADY LANE COMMERCIAL BUILDING
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
7720 SW WESTGATE
PORTLAND,OR 97225
1S1358C-00300
UNITED STATES BAKERY
PO BOX 14769
PORTLAND,OR 97214
1S135BA-03300
UNIVERSUS
BY STEVE ECOFF
442 GLENWOOD DR
OXNARD,CA 93030
1S135BC-00200
VERIZON NORTHWEST INC
PO BOX 152206
IRVING,TX 75015
, .
. . . . � �
Nathan and Ann Murdock Mildren Design Group
PO Box 231265 Attn: Gene Mildren
Tigard, OR 97281 7650 SW Beveland Street, Suite 120
Tigard, OR 97223
Sue Rorman Diane Baldwin
11250 SW 82�d Avenue 3706 Kinsale Lane SE
Tigard, OR 97223 Olympia, WA 98501
Naomi Gallucci
11285 SW 78�Avenue
Tigard, OR 97223
Michael Trigoboff
7072 SW Barbara Lane
Tigard, OR 97223
Brad Spring
7555 SW Spruce Street
Tigard, OR 97223
Alexander Craghead
12205 SW Hall Boulevard
Tigard, OR 97223-6210
Gretchen Buehner
13249 SW 136� Place
Tigard, OR 97224
John Frewing
7110 SW Lola Lane
Tigard, OR 97223
CPO 46
16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242
Tigard, OR 97224
CPO 4M
Pat Whiting
8122 SW Spruce �
Tigard, OR 97223
CITY OF TIGARD - EAST INTERESTED PARTIES �i:lcurpin\setupllabels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: 21-Oct-05
� . � - .
GEOGFAPHIG IN=ORMAiION SYS'EM
AREA N�TIFlED
(500')
�
0
�,
sm -----------
p -----------
�-o �s�2ca000eoo FOR: PETER F. FRY
�n LOCUST
� i _ RE: 1S135BB00700; 00800
� ___________
�
�
0
�o
1S135BS00500 �� 1S135iA001U0 O Property owner information
y � —� is valid for 3 months from
�' the date printed on this map.
y 1S135BA02698
i°
-- �
S135iAD330 �
1S135B1103300
5135BA033B
1S135BY00501 — -— �
1 3566006
—- \�\
I51356C092i
\�� 51358C00600 ����35BC00500 � 35BC003 35 C602 � I �
\ \ � iS1�d59D00a01 1S1356D00300 � N
\� 1513 C b200 I
W ` � � 135BC00 0 SHADY
-- fCV �N
� -1S195BC01201-=-��- - ---_-� J 1S1S5EB012 0 � -
�_ �'i �__ 1513 t80 980 o zoo ao'soa Fegt
� �151 5i00 100
WINDSO T 1S1356C00900 (� 7"=431feet
\ � J� 1S135Bi01300 I �S13 �Y� 800 j�
�
\ r- �
_.� -- / — .,
� � 151356COOlOD ���
• WINDSOR PL C9
� �
•�� �o o Information on this map is for general location only and
°000���O�� ahould be verified with the Development Services Division.
_ �oo� go W 73125SWHaIIBIvd
� o > Tigard.OR 97223
(O (503)639-0171
�__._ �_ \ -- � htip:l/www.ci.ligard.or.us
- .__. — . __ .__
Community Development Plot date:May 16,2006;C:lmagic\MAGIC03.APR
1S1356C-00202 1S13586-OD600
BELANICH ROGER M KP VENTURES LLC
22020 17TH AVE SE#200 2519 NW MARSDEN PL
BOTHELL,WA 98021 PORTLAND,OR 97229
1S135BC-00201 751356A-02800
�OG LANPHERE ENTERPRISES INC
22020 17T #200 ATi'N:DOUG MEATH
BO LL,WA 9802 12520 SW CANYON RD
BEAVERTON,OR 97005
151356D-01200 1S135BB-007�0
BURDICK-FORBES INVESTMENTS LLC LANPHERE PROPERTIES V LLC
BY DONALD C BURDICK 12505 SW BROADWAY
434 RIDGEWAY RD BEAVERTON,OR 97005
LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97034
151356�-00300 1S135BB-00800
CARROLL TIGARD LLC LAI�Pf-fER OPERTI LC
420 NW 11TH ST#1004 12505 S
PORTLAND, OR 97209 B ERTON,OR 97005
1S13566-00501 1S135BA-033D2
CH REALTY III/PORTLAND MARX ERNEST L&BARBARA R
INDUSTRIAL LLC TRUST
ATTN:ASSET MGR-PORTLAND INDUSTR 2140 VELOZ DR
2100 MCKINNEY AVE#700 SANTA BARBARA,CA 93108
DALLAS,TX 75201
151356C-00700 1S135BA-03303
ALTY III/PORTLAND C ERNEST L&BARBARA R
INDUSTR TRUST
ATTN:ASSET MG - LAND INDUSTR 2140 VEL
2100 M Y AVE#700 S BARBARA,CA 8
LAS,TX 75201
1S1356C-00600 1S135BC-01201
CH TY III/PORTLAND MBM HOLDING COMPANY LLC
INDUSTRIAL 659 NW PACIFIC GROVE DR
ATTN:ASS R-POR Dp� INDUSTR BEAVERTON,OR 97006
210 KINNEY AVE#700 �
DALLAS,TX 75201
1S135BC-00100 1S135BD-00200
CONOCOPHILLIPS CO NORED STANLEY D&AUDENE C
PO BOX 1539 1650 NW GARFIELD AVE
PASO ROBLES,CA 93447 CORVALLIS,OR 97330
1S1356D-00900 1S135BC-00900
DORR GEORGE/ANNA MARIE TRUSTEES PAULSON LIMITED LIABILITY CO
DORR JOHN D& BY RICHARD G PAULSON SR
DORR PATRICK M 1511 NE 150TH AVE
9925 SW 77TH PORTLAND,OR 97230
PORTLAND,OR 97223
1S135BC-00500 1S735BD-00800
JOHN DURBIN 8 ASSOC OF OREGON LL PEARSON DENNIS
10770 SW CASCADE AVE 15840 SE TONG RD
TIGARD,OR 97223 CLACKAMAS,OR 97015
, t ,
1S135BA-00100
PPR SQUARE TOO LLC
BY EPROPERTY TAX-DEPT 108
PO BOX 4900
SCOTTSDALE,AZ 85261
1S135BB-00500
RAM/CASCADE CENTER LLC
3998 SOUTHPOINTE DR
EUGENE,OR 97405
1 S 135 B D-01300
SCHAEFER ROBERT M&SALLY J&
MILLER GERALD V
BY SHILO INN-WASHINGTON SQUARE
11600 SW SHILO LN
PORTLAND, OR 97225
1512600-00400
SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO
DEPT 768TAX B2-116A
3333 BEVERLY RD
HOFFMAN ESTATES, IL 60179
iS1358D-01100
SHADY LANE COMMERCIAL BUILDING
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
7720 SW WESTGATE
PORTLAND,OR 97225
1S1356C-00300
UNITED STATES BAKERY
PO BOX 14769
PORTLAND,OR 97214
151356A-03300
UNIVERSUS
BY STEVE ECOFF
442 GLENWOOD DR
OXNARD, CA 93030
1 S 1356C-00200
VERIZON NORTHWEST INC
PO BOX 152206
IRVING,TX 75015
, ,
, � , '
Nathan and Ann Murdock Mildren Design Group
PO Box 231265 Attn: Gene Mildren
Tigard, OR 97281 7650 SW Beveland Street, Suite 120
Tigard, OR 97223
Sue Rorman Diane Baldwin
11250 SW 82�d Avenue 3706 Kinsale Lane SE
Tigard, OR 97223 Olympia, WA 98501
Naomi Gallucci
11285 SW 78th Avenue
Tigard, OR 97223
Michael Trigoboff
7072 SW Barbara Lane
Tigard, OR 97223
Brad Spring
7555 SW Spruce Street
Tigard, OR 97223
Alexander Craghead
12205 SW Hall Boulevard
Tigard, OR 97223-6210
Gretchen Buehner
13249 SW 136th Place
Tigard, OR 97224
John Frewing
7110 SW Lola Lane
Tigard, OR 97223
CPO 4B
16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242
Tigard, OR 97224
CPO 4M
Pat Whiting
8122 SW Spruce ,
Tigard, OR 97223
CITY OF TIGARD - EAST INTERESTED PARTIES �i:lcurpinlsetupllabelslClT East.doc) UPDATED: 21-Oct-05
May 15 06 09:57a p.1
, • ,
CI�Y aF TlGARD � �
COMMUNITY DEUELOPh��NT DEPARTM�NT
PL�P�KING DIY[SION �
13125 SW HALI. BOULEVARD
�IGAR�, OREGaN ��2�3 ClTY OFTIGARD
Cbmmurrity�Deve(apmer.t
PHONE; 5D3-639-4111 fAX: 503-684-T197 �Attn_ PaifY/Plan�in�� S�pr'rcg�r�ztrrrCommunity
���^��J�� V � O O � O D D p a
�-�l v�--�-�u ��� 0 O � �
�� ��� ��
Property owner information is valid for 3 mon#hs from the date of your �equest
fND�CATE ALL PROJECT MAP &-TAX LOT NUMBERS (i.e. 1S134AB, Tax Lot fl0100 OR THE
ADDRESSES F�R ALL PRO,�ECT PARCELS BELO�N: �
C G�' l .. ,L� � � S # GG� ���
i ' s �
"'� ��` l3� l�� � GG, �
J
PLEASE BE AWARE THAT ONLY � SET O ABELS WI�.L BE PROVEDED AT THIS TIME FoR
HOLQING YOUR NE(GHBQR�QOa N1EET1 . A�ter submitting your land use application to the Gity, and
tF�e �rol'ect planrter has reviewed vour ap cation for compiete ess, you will be nofifed by means of an
incompleteness let�er ta obtain you�2 fi sets of fabels. N �
�The 2 fir�al sets of labels need to be piaced on envelopes witf� first class
envelopes in t�e form of postage stamps (no me�ered envelopes an� neo�ereturnpadd9es) and
resubrnitted to the City, for the purp ase of prov�ding notice to property owners of the propose� lan� use
apnl;cation and the de.cis�on. The Z sets of envelopes must be kept sep�rate. The person �isted below will
be'called to pick up and pay for�t�e labels wt�en they are ready,
NAME �F COlVTACT PERSOPJ: � �r � � PNONE: -- a�� — a /
,�t/
FAX:_�'�- ��y/ �/.S—
ThES request may be mailed, faxed or hand delivered fo the City ofi Tigard. Please allow a
2-day minimum for processing reques�s. Upon compfetion of your req��st the contact person wili be
called to pick up their request that v��cl( be placed in "WiIJ Calf' by their last �ame, at ihe Community
Develapment Reception Desk. .
p e�determinedocessing your- request must be paid at the time of pick up, as exact cost ean not be
PLEASE NOTE: FOR REASONS OF aCCURACY, ONLY ORIGINAL MAl�ING LABELS PRdV4DED
BY THE CITY VS. RE•TYPED MAILING LABELS WILL BE ACCEPTED,
Cost Desc7ption�
$1� to generate t�e maifing iist, plus$2 per sheet for printing the list onto labe!s(20 addresses per sheet).
Then, mu[ti I the cost to rint one set of labels b ihe number of sets re uesfed.
EXAM PL� �
� COST F�R 7'H!S REQUEST
4 sheels o`laoels x$2isheel= 8.00 x 2 sets= $16.00
2 she�ls o�laoels x�2ish�ot for interestec parties x 2 sets= � q pp —�sheet(s)of labefs x$2/sheet=$4 , x�z sets= �
GENERATE LiST = � --�—.sheel(s}of labels x$?Jsheet fo-interested part:es=S 2, x ' _ sets= � �o
TO''AL = $31.C�0 uEPJERATE LIST = 3 i t I10
� TOTAL = $2 1,00
V �
�i'��rf�����y's
1S135BB-00800 • � /'
LANPHERE PROPERTIES V LLC �� �/!� ��5���
125D5 SW BROADWAY L��f.7'G�i7/ �� ��'
BEAVERTON,OR 97005
-�'�,��/��
7S135B6-00700
LANPHERE PROPERTIES V LLC
12505 SW BROADWAY
BEAVERTON,OR 97005
03/22/2006 22:29 N0.256 D02
Pf�,APP.HEID BY`
CITY (3F TIGARD PLANNI�IG DIViSION ��
13925 SW HAII. BOULEVARO TIGARO, QR 97223-8189 %,� �� �-� �Y
503.639.41711503,684:7297
CITV qF liCsARD �� �
OREGON �,ANLl USE PERMII' APPLICATION �`� ��
File it L� Z.c,v • _./c;:� Other Case i� T�--t��b` L7��c� U
Date c� By - Receipt i! City ��f,�rb� pate Complete S � '�-
TY PER (T O AR APPLY N FOR
[]AdJustmonUVariance(I or Il) ❑Minor Land Partition (N) []zone Chang9 (III} '
Q Comprehensive Pla�Arnendment(tV) ❑Planned Development(ill) ❑Zone Change Annexation (1V)
�]Conditional.Usa (illj (}�Sensitive l.ands i�eview(I, II or III) ❑Zone Ordinance Amendment(IV)
[] HlstorlC Overlay(II or III) d Site Development Review(II)
[] Home OcCUpatlon{II} ❑Subdivislon(II or lil)
" r � avai a e
O 6 �Nc( - _
I 5 BI3 # � � ,
� �„c�.,�s �� � �
� -t���
c ` � �� � /Z �, o
SZ�.�— ��% y . � c ' � .
��,� � �3 _ y_ � �
. s i m e n one
L�--� � � �. J r � � -
� �� � � t r7l�o r
"When the owner and t�e applicant are different people, the appiicant must be purchaser of record or a lessea i�
possessio� with written authorization frorn the owner or an agant af tha owner. The�nars rnust sign this appiication in th�
s aCe rovided on the bdck of thls form ar submit a wrltten authorizatlon with this a licatlon.
as e s eci ic
G �
' 1
APi'I.ICATIONS WfI.L �OT 8f ACCEPTED WITHOUT ALI. OF TH� RE�tlIRED SUBMITTAL LEMENTS A: �
DESCRIBED IN TH "BASIC SUpM�TTAL R�QUlREMENTS" INFORMATION SHEET. � . �
;
1
�
.�
p.1
�tt/A7� es�v +.u-s.�+ w�.,
TI�iE I►PPLICwNT BNALL CF��I�L�I-
• rt the apptk:stion js g�ent�d, the�pp�c�M shall e�rcise the�iphts prar�led M aoaordoenoe w�h th�
tam►t and tUbjsot to ali tha COnd�loM snef IirNtatlOns of 1hm apprOY�t.
• Atl ths abov+e sta�ertwnt�sr�d ths atebernents M th�plot ptan�atlad�m�nts.and exhiblta
transmitted �rewith;are tn,e;snd tl�e ap�'�ca�so ackt'�o�Medse d�at sny perrn�I�d� b�ed
or�this ap�iC�1a�, map be rovoked�it ia�ound that sny wd�+steternents ere falsQ.
• T11e applirAnl h�s resd the ent{►s c�rnsrils of the appticati0rf.it�c(udi�p$�e p0liaie�and ct9�Crin,
snd un�tsnds tMe requirorr�ents br approvinp�denyktg th0 sppkca�on(a�. �
• SItiNATURE�O!��,OWNER OP THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE t�'�At�IR�.
. �
. �
�
� � 3
Own�r s il�nal� Da�b�
QwAers=Ig1�qlun Oa�e -
Own�r's�iun U� •
_
• i
OM�nK'��lon�Run Dsh �
'Ownars Si�atqn • Dab �
__SLsL :
APp ApenVR�ptrs � nat�un D�e .
. ,
Appllc�thllA bdw'r�ip�rturs Dsl� .
. � I
zi�'d Z80.ON S3S I2Jd�131N3 3tl3i�� Wd�'�:0 T 90F.1�'bZ'2bW
CITY ON� TIGARD RECEIPT
�� DEVELOPMENT SERVICES RECEIPT DATE: 3/29/06
� 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 JURISDICI'ION.: TIG
� � 503-639-4171 www.rigard-or.gov CASHIER DATE:
CASHIER RECEIPT #:
LINE ITEMS:
Case No. Fee Description Revenue Acc� No. Amount Due
SLR2006-10005 (Landus) PreApp Conf 100-0000-438000 1992.00
(Landus) LR Surcharge 100-0000-438050 294.00
_ � � . . . .
LANPHERE ENTERPRISES,INC. � 0 9 4 5 5 0
12520 S.W. CANYON ROAD " PHONE 643-5577
BEAVERTON, OREGON 97005 �BANK 94550 5112�
� www.buybob.com
�' QATE PAY THIS AMOUNT AMOUNT OF CHECK
�' *******2 286 DOLLARS �� CENTS ******2,286 . 00
�: 16MAR06 �
��;
��;
s o.
��
"�;
��� TO y
"�� THE CITY OF TIGAFLD
ORDER
`I O F ._
� CORPORATE DIVI
`�
Total Due: $ 2286.00
� SEE ATTACHED FEE SCHEDULE.
PAYME NTS:
Payer. Lanphere Enterprises Inc.
Method Initials Check No. Confirm No. Amount Paid
Check KJP 094550 2286.00
Total Paid: $ 2286.00
I:\Building\Manual Permit System\ManualReceip[.doc 03/14/06
05/16/2806 68:36 503624^'91 TIGARD BUILDING DEPT PAGE 02/05
. , .
.
RECEIVED
� � TREE� REIV�QVAL MaY 1 s zoos
TYPE I APPLICATIOt�ITYOFTIGARD
CITY Of TIGARD 13125 SW Ha1!B/vd., Tipard, OR 97223(503)639-4971 FAXP���/�INEERING
6ENERAL INFORMAT1pN
� PRE-APP.HELD WITH: `S�1�
• DAT�OF PRE-APP,: ��
Property Address/LncaUon: � d ��
G r��(�-��rG, /1�l
! -.�'- FQR STAFF USE ONLY
� Tax Map&Tax lot#(s): �S � �
�:ase No.(�):_Tt2�Z� �" l.of�a .
Site Size: ,�". � GC Y�°-s �Jther Case No.(9): .5L,1� Z�_� . - l000s
� /� Receipt No.: �L}'�
property OwneNDeed Holder(sj':�(���K t�N �� ,4pplication Accepted By:
Aad�ess: S � . _ "
'� Phone: i�s�te: _ 5 � lFs/ Z.o o t,�,
Ciry: �/ zip: CJ7 S .
Applicant': � • Da�e Determined To Be Corr�lste�
Addross• I�� �c�n, �.SPhone:�.3 a/�/��/�
�� Z,p. ���� L'omp Ptan2one O�signation:
��Y����� _ u� � S
• When t�e awner and the appficant are different people, the R�.�r+'°s i;�Wr�^'^�.,�� -��
appliCant�must be the purchaser of rccord or a iessee In possessian
with wntten autl�orizaUvn from the owner or an aqent of tha owner.
The owner�s) must aign this application in the spave provided on the
badc ot thiS f4rm or submit a written� authorization with, this RE�UIRED SUBMII?AL ELEM�NTS
applicatton. �
PROPOSAISUMMARY
� Application Elements Submitted:
(�AppliCation Forrn
The awners oi record of the subject property request a Tree Rmmoval
Perrnit ta aitow(please be spedfic,inctude e�cact IaatiQn,etc.): ��Owner's Signature/Written Authorization
� [�Titk Transfer Instrument or Oeed
c; �
C v�� (,�,c • [� Site/F?lot Plan
� ✓ • (�10l copiss besed on p�app chock litt)
, � � / G � [] Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8�h"x 11')
� �� A+ ' pprt
� � � �
N [] Filing Fee� S 1,�A0 �g•S C�
G � G. UO �/
(� � . G � Jurisdicticn: ❑ City ❑ Urb
/ /
� r� F „ --
Gf✓c���� r.i.Gij. l� ��� 1� /
.�� S t c(� pr� r r�r,k
� �7" i�v � _ , �y. ,
�S �p I�
�
_ a
�r �. _
a , L �
. ..... .... ��.... .�.,,,, ..���.coy r�• htN I UN MU 1 UhiCYCLE PAGE 02
iq�r 7�f W 11l�
bIlri�/�6 Mi'i ��iZd�66� TIiiAID �.0� � p3
�'� ri►�o
LL!�Iq►VIIIl1�i�OMAL 11��Ild�lyd LAI�OR��I�lR Lw1O INi�Ol��11�t�lI�IY�
' �IMI!lth��IM�
.
, �
��!/ r"�ta/?7t<<1/ . , � :
; . ,
'IS�Yllr Ir�111� I�u��wf 1��b��II�L rf�rr �
IN�
�si�l�1r+t�„�,nsl�e�a ob�.���R M'�f�psae La�d ur I�y1�J
. 'M�M�1�'�N1�ljllp.l.�'711p` •
�
' � r!���g��q,��rt rril wni�Mr�4�rM�d�+�YOa�IA�lr 1w�e eal�w r M
�M /1d�M1�sa!!1t�fp1Uq1,
� M Of!Ir a����IIII YI��r111M1 lIA��M�rl�b�IIIr�O AIfrM�Mb 11�!�!
w+�r�.w��"e"a'a�+��`�...d„���a�ar�b+�naine.a�►
� r�•�r,•��••����r ar r�.�v�a t���roaa.a�e a�a�ar u�w.rds w.
�uM�k�br�qp��RwM+f�ph�+,
�� ,
� :.
.:.�; ���[�w�M���1�ie��OA/M�
.
•;;•....
.:• ;...., .
.:::: •::::::, ti
�:..;. ���':::• OrCt�wla fL� �r��;l � � '
.., .. • ,��.����.. �
�::::;:. .:::' .
:;.••.. .
'::::�� ' .
.._ .
. �
. ��
• w ,
, �
,
��d ��� S3SI}lek�p 3�id�b`1 41�Q1:r �QQ'ot•iw.� �
_ EiE'd i L9'�fJ S3S I21d2131N3 32l3FIdNtJ� WH9D:L 900z L i'.ltiW
NARRATIVE
�
� Peter Finley Fry �,.�r� Ph.o. (S03) 274-27
44
. 2153 SW Main Street, #105, Portland, Oregon USA 97205 • Fax (.503) 274-1415 • pfin(eyfry@a�� �oyyi
March 22, 2006
SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW
?�ANPHERE ENTERPRISES
ADDRESS : 10685 and 10655 SW Greenberg
APPLICANT/OWNER: Bob Lanphere, Jr.
Lanphere Enterprises
12520 S.W. Canyon Road
Beaverton, Oreqon 97005
APPLICANT REPRESENTATIVES:
Planning Consultant: Peter Finley Fry AICP
2153 SW Main Street #105
Portland, Oregon 97205
(503) .274-2744
(503) 274-1415 FAX
Engineer: Andrew Jansky
Flowing Solutions
3305 SW 87�' Avenue
Portland, Oreqon 97225
(503) 297-6331
(503) 297-6053 FAX
STATE IDENTIFIGATION NUI�IDER: 1S BB #0070�
ZONE: MUC Mixed Use Commercial
Washington Square Regional Center
SENSITIVE Lp�IJpg gEVIEW
Type II
PROGItAM DESCRIPTION
Reroute water drainage way to eastside of property. Replace culvert
crossing at road and extend culvert along property line. Drain
pipe in former drainage way will be covered with gravel and
compacted. The project will result in allowing two private
properties to be combined, relocating the public drainage way from
its current location segregating private property, and locating the
new drainage way along public right-of-way for the majority of its
relocated length.
�
Peter Finley Fry
I�anphere Enterprise drainage way relocation M�reh 22, 2006
RESPONSE TO CRITERIA
18 . 390 (Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study
Type II(18.390.040)
Sensitive Lands Permits
- Within Drainage ways 18.775
Finding: The proposal impacts an existing drainage way that
requires a Type iI process.
18.530 (Commercial Zoning District)
H. MUC: Mixed Use Commercial District.The MLJC zoning district includes land around the Washington Square
Mall and land immediately west ofHighway 217. Primary uses perrr►itted include of�ice buildings,retail,and
service uses.Also permitted are mixed-use developments and housing at densities of50 unites per acre.Lazger
buildings are encouraged in this azea with parking under, behind or to the sides of buildings.
Finding: The light industrial/distribution uses preexist the
application of the MUC zone. The proposed relocation of the
drainage ditch allows the two properties to be used as a single
site that is consistent with the purpose of the Mixed Use
Commercial District . �
18 .630 (Washington Square Regional Center)
A. Purpose.
1. This Chapter will implement the vision, concepts and principles contained in the Washington
Square Regional Center Plan, and the recommendations contained in the Phase ll
Imp/ementafion Plan Summary Reporf, prepared by a Task Force appointed by the City of
Tigard.
2. Metro's Regional Urban Growth Management Functional Plan target growth capacity for the
Washington Square Regional Center will be met by permitting mixed use development within the
Regional Center at densities appropriate for an urban center.
3. A mixed use Regional Center will contain a variety of districts that vary in scale, predominant use,
and character. Distinct districts, connected to each other and to the rest of the region by a multi-
modal transportation system, will provide a range of working, living and shopping opportunities.
4. Improved multi-modal transportation links, higher densities, variety of land uses, and enhanced
environmental qualities will all contribute to create a desirable, livable community in the face of
dramatic population and employment growth.
5. New mixed-use zoning districts, along with existing residential zoning districts in established
areas, are appropriate for the Regional Center.
2
;
I
_.� ',
,
Peter Finley Fry
Lanphere Enterprise drainage way relocation M�rCh 22 ' 2�06
Finding: The light industrial/distribution uses preexist the
application of the MUC zone. The proposed relocation of the
drainage ditch allows the two properties to be used as a single
site that is consistent with the purpose of the Mixed Use
Commercial District . No development is proposed that would require
compliance to the development standards .
18. 775 (Sensitive Land Review)
18.775.070 Sensitive Land Permits
D. Within drainage ways. The appropriate approval authority shall approve, approve with conditions or deny
an application request for a sensitive lands permit within drainage ways based upon findings that all of the
following criteria have been satisfied:
1. The extent and nature of the proposed land form alteration or development will not create site disturbances
to an extent greater than that required for the use;
Finding: The proposed work is the minimum necessary to relocate the
d r.ainage way from a location between two pier_.es of private property
t o run along the right-of-way for the majority of the relocated
distance.
2. The proposed land fonn alteration or development will not result in erosion, stream sedimentation, ground
instability, or other adverse on-site and off-site effects or hazards to life or property;
Finding: The area proposed for work is flat . Erosion control will
be utilized throughout the development process .
3• The water flow capacity of the drainage way is not decreased;
Finding: The drainage way is proposed to be replaced by a public
facility of equal or greater, capacity.
4. Where natural vegetation has been removed due to land form alteration or development, the areas not
covered by structures�r impervious surfaces will be replanted to prevent erosion in accordance with Chapter
18.745, Landscaping and Screening;
Finding: The drainage way proposed to be filled will be
incorporated into the existing yards of both adjacent properties
with proper compaction and materials .
5. The drainage way will be replaced by a public facility of adequate size to accommodate maximum flow in
accordance with the adopted 198] Master Drainage Plan;
3
Peter Finley Fry March 22, 2006
Lanphere Enterprise drainage may relocation
Finding: The drainage way is proposed to be replaced by a public
facility of equal or greater capacity that is proposed to run along
side a public right-of-way for the majority of its relocated length
as opposed to running through the center of two pieces of private
p roperty providing better public access .
6. The necessary U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board, Division of State Lands, and
CWS approvals shall be obtained;
Findinq: The U. S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon Land
B oard, Division of State Lands, and Clean Water Services have been
c onsulted. Their responses and approvals when necessary are �
a ttached.
7. Whcre land fonn alterations and/or development are allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain,
the City shall require the consideration of dedication of suf�icient open land area within and adjacent to the
floodplain in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. This area shall include portions of a suitable elevation
for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted
pedestrian bicycle pathway plan.
Finding: Alteration or development is not proposed within or
a djacent to the 100-year floodplain.
9
� e�\te\fsprojacts\lonphere\beovertonhor �d\6eovertonhondaconstructian.dwq
[
�II � �� � � �� �' �.-. ..
� I
�� �
# ' , :{`F� � �
��`X + _�� ..`.h� � t ..
_ X
"f,.-= .�f SPt.7zi1Y �� ir —°--�"" -
�{ ------»--.-..� � i
V���� ��S �� � � i
� � � ��� ��'
� O rr � � � ��-� �' �� � '
n r yy�
Z � t;�^�"'r" '�,� "w4��� r��
\ O /� �F
� � � ��
� D `�' m
� �TJUh i .� O
�i "
� �
4 �---- D �^4 ,��-–
` � ,,�� O k��,, ■
Y4tN .� a � ,. i!!;.- . �I'
� _- -��. �-g�� ��
: : x i : � r . a . .
K i � J : i F 's i• p '- o r • r v • N r -
�� �� ��� ����� � ��� ��� ��� �� �� ��� ��� �� ����� ���� �� �� € ��g � � o C �
�� �� g �� ��� �� � �� � ��� a���� ���d� � � � �� . r G1�� O� � Z
� � ��� 3���R �� �9 E � �� � � �� Q 9 E�o p�a�9�j � OR� RM � C y � � �
� �� � � ��B �� � � � �� ��¢� C .'� � �� �� ° � /� � rn =
� � � x� � � sY �� �� �� �� � � � �'� ��� � � '�� ��� � � � 3 o c� � m
�� � � � ��� �� � � � f� � �� �� ��o�� �� ° � ' —I �
�� � ��� � � € � - � � g� � � m ` � � �� _ � � rn
� �R� . a � � � � � �� �� �� � ��� � � � �� � � � � � � �
� � ��� ���k � �€ � �� � � € � �� � €� � � � � �� � i � z � � rn rn
� � �� f �� g �R� �� � � � �� � g ���� � � Z rn � �v z
�° � z� � ��� � � � � �� � �� � �� ����� ���4 � ��€ �� -+ '� � rmn � r�n
� � i Q � � � � � � � � a � � O
n � � � L? g!t � �aQ �s� � � ��Q�Q ��o� � � � Q �, Z Tz n �
� ��� ���y P �� � �� � � �� �� �Q v#�Q� �� � € �� ��� � _ � W rn �
� ��� � � �� �6 ,� � �� ���� � � Trn C 3
� �� ��� � �� �� � �� � � t �� - �p� �� g � �x � /�+ � z (!1
� > � � � �� q a � �� � � m
� � �� ���� � �� � � � �� � � ��� �� � � � � 3 � �' �
� D
� v
F p s . � ,• . . . r r - � �
��� ����� ����� ������ �� �� �� �� ����� ��� ���� z o0
�x� ���� ; �� ������ � �� � �� �� ��� �� � 3
� ��" ���� �� ��� B F �� �� �� ��� �� �
��� �� � � C �,�� : � �� � �q� � $ � —c�i
� � 4�� ��3� �2��� � � �� f�iw � � � p
���� �'�q � „� � � �� � � � g a� •�� � Z
. +� � � �a��� s ; ��� ��� � � Z �
a � � � ��
� s ���� ���� ������ � � � �� ��i �� �a o r
���� �� � �� ����a � R � � � � �� ��
d� '!� �4 �� � � a�� ; � i
� � � � � � �
� � �� � � a � � �� 4� �
� �p�� �� @ a � � �x�
��E R� ���� ���� � ° � � � ��g �q aa
� . �� ��
r rn �„�,
� ��M TITLE SHEET 'a'
� �
� " ..�.
, BEAVERTON HONDA �
"'O" °m` �-r � ? 10B85 SW CREENBURG ftD
� +�' TICARD, OREGON �
� 6 a� eievx ria.act w��
�� r.\h\feprojecta\laophere\beoNertonhon� �beovertonhondoconshuction.dwq
r
�
D �
� �
'D n
�7 '
D
c�o �� �, 'v
�r�*i�az° � a
-+e�o ci v� -o r�
� �.,.� � �
�f'1tyZ�7 DC7
r��-"�C nC D
Oz C7 mr �
�"�'n`" :U!*'I ITl C,.X_, Z
D��f*10 fT1Zi7
Z Z O D ,�� r N C
C7-1
Z Z
L"1
V
S(3)
C— — -X��'— _�ts��^_
�- X
.zrwr
i�l �� (� - �, � m o
9NU1dd �� �."_��-,_.;-,-.r_^ ,
II _ �N�� ,-
,� - ,, � ' - --
,
��----,_---:- -
1�� `,/ ��� (
�� � `�� � � �
�; ;
�� � ;, �
,
� `.I/
�j '
�� I
I; �s /
l� > .
�jI \\ I�
I /� t I
� i � s
r� .,
; �ua , � ?
Nusnc� .-�_ ; ;
� � JNI/1Vd ( � <
` - ___------ -�N�� - I I I
Y � - -- ----- --- -_-- _---'� I
��n -- ,� __ __ - - - � . _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _. I. �
" '" ,,,,"" �� Rowt�p�dutlorr SITE OVERVIEW ""
� ��j '�'.:'�„�� 9EAVERTON HONDA 2
�� � 10685 SW CREENBURC RD
� '°' � "� TIGARD, OREGON L°,
_� o.a�eie.� na¢t r.w+o� V
' � � ♦
� I* �
�
� � � �b�
ij
� I EXISTING BUILDIN __ ' f' � �
�I�' ' "' xa.� ' am
o �
� j � Z oW z
� � � g =��
'� � � XISTING XISTING SCALE VAUL ' � �;°
�I CULUERTS N n3.o�9° OUTFALLT� w �"o
li!� �M PKieO = PROPERTY ~ W��
I' �. p � m�F �
+ p wuc xsa xm ' �
�• F- \� Xres Xre� _ i
U
� ' R�TECT POLE � ��� DGE A/C � � ' x� ��
� �-'~�'`.�` �__ - __ - �_' -- ., �'�-�_ _ �x.� , _ - #S�`
I - --__--- -- - _�_- - ------ ____ �rn � lA��
�� I� k ° - - — v�
X� �-----�--- N
� �J ------ xx'- —_ _ �ao—�.,._, __�_ _ -
TREES � - ------- ---_-=�-_ — _-� �
—�.---
EXISTING DITC HAIN-LINK � ��1;
FENCE 0 20 4� 60
� PLAN VIEW TREE
� Sco/e.• 1'= 20'
0
2 � �
€
.
U y
� } S
D � �
�� CrossSectlon-1 � �
120.0 CrossSection-2
� 120.0
120.0 120A �
110.0 110.0
€ i 5�, 110.0 110.0
r i
�`0 1QO.0 100.0 100�0
a HW 100,0
u
i 90,0 90,0 H W
� 90.0 90.0 �
0 8U,0 BO.�
i
80,0 gp.0
.�.
0
� SECTION 1 SECTION 2
> i
1i
�
• � � {
J `
' I)j
� j�1 ��� � �t e fG
IPE-END , - �
� IE=+/-97,5 ; �
'I ��� +� C�NTRACT�R ; ,�,.,, �
'� ,' ! T❑ FIELD VERIF�Y p om �
zz
'� � � AFTER EXCAVAT�pN w ��y�
'I SAW CUT A/C ' DITCH INLET � 'a3 0
N�a�Z3 0�o SEE SHEET � ��'
� BDTH SIDES t000�.aiao N o
, �
a � ���NT:P►c o � IE=+/- 99,5 � Q�'<
Xut1. X�+ �' m�F �
EM❑�/E EXI���NG � CONNECT SC LE DRAIN -
DUCTILE CULVE�TS I,N EW CU VERT - x� x� s
,°' `�'
' ~��--`� � --- N 90 LF 24' PIPE`�_ o jj��
�-- __ ------ -
---- - _ -- l -- -_ _
— ` -___'�_ - S=0,0069 APPROX. - `' '°" ��/
� ��
I ---- - __=c_ ��SS
k �– -- �---� -- -- W �
��� t — '- _`—A___--.--------- ' -- ---�-- - �N ',
f7i---'_.-___,-___ _ t (q
DEFLECT PIPE � � _` ------- __ --- -�-- --------
❑R FITTING EM�VE ' - ------ �
AS REQUIRED BUSHITREE .�
IP-RAP �UTFALL REMOVE TREES ��1
CLASS Z ❑D�T REM�VE/REL�CATE � 2�. ¢p
9 EXISTING FENCE P�N VIEW 60
5
�� sco% 1'= 20'
� �
v
v
�
� 4
�fr � �
CrossSectlor-1 � �
D 120.0 120.0 CrossSection-2
; 120.0 120.0
Iio.o A -GR VEL �
] .5' I10,0
� - 110,0
� i 110.0
100.0 100.0
�
' 100.0
E HW ioo.o
�_-- HW
� so.o ^ p ❑P ED 90,0 9p,o 90.0
�a 80.0 P PE P pP❑ ED �
80.o P PE
� 80.0 80.0
0
� SECTION 1
% SECTION 2
6
�
�
, ,t ' . I r,
� �e�
uu,� °� �
•aunq �
� �
�
DOSi.A.G-.. g. DETFCTABI.E MAq11NC TAPE zZ
i =W�
:�r_.'w'••� • "i� \ �a .__- .__ J00�P!1 J =
wr�a�oaai �- . • "� �41
Iovi�w oe�voo�n._.- '_., ;:t� .%:1> \ *�vt cwar�tc �� 03�
, s.• .��r,; ` oasr.Ac. nas, Q ��'
�emyw��o_ _-_ i �� l j a m c
Q1Vlm R}OOf � .r.l � m�F �
O
12' �
J'-�N16 yIN�, :') Y� �]
��6Y��OEWT _____- -"_'RDWOA710M �
( �07E01) 'I I �� � ' �j� ��C
� B 6• r I'!!!iC �
MI�L M1N. ��� E�PER___ / � �
PI.IIM ! � PUN
� :. , , ���
7. tY PAVEJIE117 SECiId-�'AC OVF7!s'COYGACiED ORAKL �\ �,.
U, ;:
�.�.
� PIPE BEDDING & BACKFILL �� - '"' —
5 . "*' `1 \4E �t`\
or 6� \ MOIE 1 6' I'-]3/!— �• 4
���
a �.�ix�twi s-3��t•
� \
raiES
v°' +.car��aciae m wxw arwv�no»tis�cum�m ro aarnw cav�cna
wni caunuemes co�r�cnw Ea�r�txxr.
c
� Q �ITCH INLET
�
�
e
o SHEET NOi��•
� AOJUST PIPE BACKFILL BASED ON � � �� �
� SELECTED BID ALiERNATE. � 5I
8
a PIPE ALTERNATE 1: ASTM-3034 OR C76 Cv RCP
BACKFILL 50-15Q P51 CDF '
� PIPE ALTERNATE 2: CLASS 50 D.I. PIPE
� BACKFILL �'—MINUS COA�IPACTED GRAVEL
m
i
� �'�a
�
/
a
.�
0g
i
n
% �
�
!
- I
�{ • r�
�ROSION CONTROL PLAN NOT � WATER BYPASS R COA� NDATiONS � �b�
,. �wow�o�s am�,�,�,,.q as�ra�w oov wr :_wrr�a nrza
a�s�nua�w�ovK a awuac oo�M �
ue.wu�v�o�oc�mwea��i°�.,�����i r�we m a�a �w r m m oo�ia w.��'v�°.� +e^O1�•••=znMas. �
1 ��m°'T•A1O��nc°r�a a�0 n t�icO°�KSO�u�n�v rihn r�sat- sYi�m�v��r� t �aru���Tx��""�Ea��rwv O o
roe�rar x����s�,��"1O"^*o�m we � j�� c �nc rwa Q.wz�.r cvm mn�°rc.o� �c imwo � �
i nc nu n,w awL�c �� �sa�oc�cnwc m n...w�rr.Irme cvar�m avnn�c vnr, Z Q j
Of111�4ft d�01Y AE ila0p GFAAIY Wa M�NL�E�'M illd0l � a �� M 11[p10� r•����TOt R�iK�' p6min Q T(mRl�R M ~ p m
���K WMTN�!�'M CORACIER Rt 1E WIAIW Cr �� n g ; E71ST.a!pllO O Z Z Z
Ll � A STY6a O�25
�� ! U =z C3
�- M Q r�taro sa�1 a na n.w 1�sr L ou�11�IC�M z V, W
T�YT mO�~r��4���M�R AIO M f1011�YMO Y��K � Z;�
mort Lm��11Ot oo wm ofmt M e4�wa�Ya10t Q O
�O/OM1�pt HOIAR M9'lif+ls[A1W1 AMM� I � � �y
4 M�F�4 51011Y W AO/LM AK M IMYJY I W��
.o�iwRi.c�°01°°�or.om��ve u�"1°'yosa,o'e'Ap��°C�wo�o "�1DL f— I e•wx. I Q � �
�R A14T 0OR Yo mlb�lAOOI Mlu oo lof 1iAK/R ti �1 ^' m'F
` u�m x`�mrn��'n.�ciwM.aconiuc��uow�ro+o S�nF�FW fRONT v1Cw W
�. lXF Oe�ADlO w MAC7N[7fb f1N1�E I�fC1Fn 1un Ysl11fY�� �� s
I�YM O ala�YAIM OI�INI AE s1/1d1�IR1q�i A EIYY M(f.
I.WSTALLA7�01 91AL1/Ol1DM M YAN1PAf.'4113R5
a �r o se.wi.�oc iww ac raor v mort c�tto�m�mau�rt �sca�on�mr�
wnr���aiw w��u�ws wo mwcrw�uo wu
lMd� N�ID M'�~R AC GiI1�0 QflNTOM�MIl MOf Ill�l�R 2 lRlOt Fi1M1C-VS£
�7MAfAl1 11�1�1 �r a�C 1�[��•
'• '°"'mm"'°'°'°^�,�.�p*�..M.�..oa � SEDIMENT FENCE �!
r��10N'�rw i�io�aie x wum�a wi r�omr,pwo►¢ ! I.
rv wc niw�wor v nc n�c�°YT�M�'w't rc�r os�w
PLAN VIEW ��
� o, ���
,
� � � , x� ,
�, �`'�i ; i
� lr� BYPASS '
�� i i� CHECK STRUCT �nza.o�90 ' �
S' �t, ��I �0007.4180 ' ��
��. IYT:PK � � '
$ ' x�ict x.es
� ���,i xuea � � �
� \ � �
'°' ATER B S � "'°'
g - ''""'~'�=_--\ - __ SYSTEM CBIDD -_ � gY�'ASS �
% '� � x �_---- - �_,w�..��-=_- __=_ _- _ � DESIGNED) C�elc`��UCTlJRE
__ -- -- -
�. ' .\ � ----- ___-�-;-_�_ ----------._--- '--- __ �
t I � ---_� __- —zxw----- '��
L , --- ----- ---------_ ----__
� ---�_�-
$ -- -
0
v
i
� � 2� 40 60 !
STAGING AREA F
� PROTECTED BY
n EROSIQN FENCE .Scrn'e: 1'= 20'
.�
&
i
r
m M
t
�
. �-;�
- � .���� DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
PORTLAND DISTRICT,CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 2946
� PORTLAND,OREGON 97208-2946
REPLY TO December 16, 2005
ATTENTION OF.
Operations Division
Regulatory Branch
Corps No.: 200500107
Mr. Peter F. Fry
2153 S W Main#1 OS
Portland, Oregon 97205
Dear Mr. Fry:
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) has received your permit application requeslin�
Department of the Army authorization to construct an 100-foot long buried storm drain pipe, in
an existing drainage ditch that is hydrologically connected to Ash Creek, and will connect two
existing storm drain pipes, as shown on the enclosed seven dra���ings identified as Corps File No.
200500107 (�iiclosure 1). Construction will involve excavating the existing drainage ditch
contents (organics, oil laden sediment and gravels) and installing a 16-inch diameter pipe in the
excavated ditch. The excavated material will be taken to a landfill for disposal. The installed
drainage pipe will be connected t� the existing storm drain at each end of the ditch. The ditch
will be filled with gravel bedding material, backfilled to existing ground elevation, and paved
over to join two parking areas together. The fill material placed below the ordinary high water
line of the drainage ditch would total approxicnately 45 cubic yards and impact approximately
0.009 acres of waters of the United States. The project is located within Section 35, Township 1
South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, at Tigard, Washington County, Oregon.
This letter verifies that your project is authorized under the terins and limitations of
Nationwide Permit (NWP)No. 39 (Residential, Commercial, and Institutional Development).
Your activities must be conducted in accordance with the conditions found in Regional
Conditions (Enclosure 2) and General Conditions (Enclosure 3)
The Oregon Department of Environmental Quality has provided their Certification
Conditions (Enclosure 4). You must also comply with these conditions.
We also direct your attention to the Regional Conditions (Enclosure 2) that require the
transfer of this permit if the property is sold and General Condition 14 that require you to submit
a signed certificate when the work is completed. A "Compliance Certification" is provided
(Enclosure 5).
Failure to comply with any of the listed conditions could result in the Corps initiating an
enforcement action. This authorization does not obviate the need to obtain other permits where
-2-
required. Permits, such as those required from the Oregon Department of State Lands (ODSL)
under Orcgon's Removal /Fill Law, must also be obtained before work begins.
This verification is valid until the NWP is modified, reissued, or revoked. All the existing
NWPs are scheduled to be modified, reissued, or revoked prior to March 18, 2007. It is
incumbent upon you to remain informed of changes to the NWPs. We will issue a public notice
when the NWPs are reissued. Furthermore, if you commence or are under contract to commence
this activity b�fore the date that the relevant nationwide permit is modified or revoked, you will
have twelve (12) months from the date of the modification or revocation of the N WP to complete
the activity under the present terms and conditions of the current nationwide perniit.
If you have any questions regarding this nationwide pertnit verification, please contact
Mr. John Ferrise at the letterhead address or telephone (503) 808-4391.
Sincerely,
����
al orda
Acti g Chief, Regulatory Branch
Enclosures
Copy Furnished:
Oregon Department of State Lands (Louise Bos - DSL NO: 33986)
U•S• Army Corps of Engineers, Regulatory(Robert Rose)
, � �
0
o � Z �
�n •• � � �
� Q O =
. N � � N
O
z
�
6�� � �
�� t.,. , �� ��. � t,� �..`; �AR i r ;., rtia h ;� �' � �r-.L , � �i
�, r , < I r
s�' p�� � �p' N8 � FILbY ��«���+� s t � _ ��,�. �r�_�� VJ
� � ;Z � �-�' 3-�pL"�4���«'� s-� a._.._.._.� ��" '�"''�o- •:{. �
f:=: r t �'�r{ tF,:. �.�5'� ''7�, �'�. �'�'�,,,L'��,y� �..� ��.n i .�?� 1 w��'t .� !' � �y.�.;�. ���r�A.�1.: �
` �5� ; O F . a *u'� {��s�,tfil�{ r '�.'�� � > � �t��.,a;. +�� �� �> �J.�r. .�S- -r�'k � U
� ' %t 'g� , � j b �,,t���,-i � ,'.i.� p��,$,�r� '` �� ,,�' .�T ;y,''ii
:`� ! ;a ���� �------{ �� d �� �F r` a Y�`'�� � '�I
.: ��-------, � � � ` ' I ',G r'h ' "` ,` `I
���' �;�� `f � �' ,�'
+i 'r"'Fa .���j � +' � ' Y�#a-,7`� I� ..�`t� rs R„`'�"w� �,. �
`" t I - " � {� t � ' �'t { � �`L� /�' ' ��' �� Q
, .. $ .,. � i O e:' .. 3 . � ,. ����� ���ic a�r �-, ~ �,_"'� �
Y �-+ i /� A T 1 .���� b�N x4 � ,
'i;� � t-`ci � n4 � � �. � � ��QN 1 lsd5 ' a f �+�,�''k`*'� h
� � i a�g�f '` �� f , i rfs- �y +�y , � �
��4i�tY"°��s3�'`* ri ? � � x 6y"�,��tia��1'�� �' �, z� ��; w�, 1_ ���,L?�
1�,�,� � ..,� �i'>.x sr�'d'�`,;�.I��xiy�, Y�� � ! �'= � ��rt "� '?°,,� �
: * t ' ' �• '" �, I '; ",�yr�ry `,' �y ��,: �r:.R ,��,. s.�,r �
.. , 1-� 1 .�. �.��� 5 �
��, }::�t�t I �,� ', . ��`' u'��-f-.�..�, � ` .�..�.' 3 4 r�- �.h'�'J' ��t � � � -�
:- � =�� F�� r
€ . .1 �n ' ^' � y ��
b �t q ;��r �,F.S,�; 4�t S
i',�j r -���''S � �� �( �� 7�,��'o�`i r t y r J '.-r,,� .. , �� � i .� Q
-,:i +111��{� �// �.... "/� � �-. � � S ¢ �L`' t !t y�r. `Y.,, � V
.f.,r.. �i �.f t '�<<'Y ( �. .�,r G:: `rr.-�' t' �_�t` .� �`i � � �
�°z � ��4 .'-^^m»�v .�r�.�� � '*� � '. �� _� �, •'�,"rZ„ i. �y: " � .� Q IL
� � Ya,. �.. a - 3,ti ,+ � -'...�i'� a + f{ " [/�J t �U •� r3� �a,i .., rt �� k�-, :7� r't'�� � � �m �
�, � �,. .�'� '`: f dt>a�,�j � T �_t V � l� '?'""�i�N�'t�rr�,... k FP,Y.F ' � � Z W Z Q
!, I .�J i�� ' y�• �l �� ���! z ^� � 'F' F M1l,,�� 1 J , � �' J'x1iF wi�`,-+S.' •� � _ � O�L.�O �
r, �'o,4 � ,c h �:�>4�, i ,��� � � x��� ',� �ra- °�'��. R,,��� W z�c�
� � _I �'�S r`°� ��' � _ , �.4 � `"' ���.:�t,+ '� s�3: .r. i z ,"!�j�� �
�
1 ,r �', >!:' ' U ,-,+ +;�r '�� �'r E r7 � O F—� � p.
.�� x l� t Y J i.: � ���.� �, r i°j`�.. �Tr y.�� � +fi 6 k� .CP�, � s, �� /�(�f/�
y�} d^"'� Y��i.I�Q ;�1
v�' _
., . �wa+ Fi k.. 'S �. �r �� oY l �F i ��,(-�( � {r�. ' h� if+ .o � N av������ f 1 1 � a 3 /`�y VJ
,M,N}��� .`�"*'� �^� �� . � .1kf"` :� i �k�St'rss�,�i�.;. ,d, ar`.K� ���� �'ii, Q�il 0
� i �t t�% L � `� At.n1K y t'�1'� d n T ��� _ � a "'e 9 �' t e,-Y'. Y�a � � t`, 2� G.I C.� �
� 5,� +`��t: �,���c�l� ,"'��f z��- d {� ' s ; I �tS�',���+ak�,. � � �,���>�j.' �"' �� W m�F w
W ��[s} ���.� TN�-,% ` x r ��'� i °{ ��..^h�"i 1 .��� f J t. u 1���"'.��.�1 i��t1���#�,.. 4i'��y'L,���.. �� � �o^ e-+ � �
�, � , ".."^.—.....---'"�•-,F^-^—.�� E � � ��'� " � U
'�f � i- �' � ',' ��J.6'�r .ra 3 f, �
�� '7Ey.'—,r-`^�'-�'' .�� �, !r� , +r .�.�"�„w ,� �iM5� � �?''� -4�'
� � �� , k�� � ' �x` '�N!14ZL�18� °° � r�;��''. ��'r�„"iy� y.:� �v � � O
"""f ,`.� �:� �F ` r`` �' " "� ''� w'`R"�`" i#� e �., �'," � d'
,'��� -:�{z"d ;'�.� r � I + � � �8. i ' - � �„� �+�,a��'r""'�'I cv�(��+ - _. "t.+,p�'� d
�'Lf 1J �I �4 ; h.� I t'�'i'�L � � !. l jH��. C'�v'4'L�'d�}l�t ',���� vw' ''�Y�
� ++a• � �' <«. r �f hy{u '� �r� � � : Y � � ' � �
4 �t1!` � t ri7;1 u���t�a �..r� F _��}� k '�ti �� � f�11�i� �T .a,� °�� �� �� �
k .r• �
� ����r �.� f F- - 'rrt �?�� y ��� if'�+`,�y� y � . . , . �
i � `�1� t�� f '.��� { �'pF Y��}� L�,�..i.""_„..�r'�n-i d �y ' t �
r ^�w,• r b �
.��°, � , t!•:.,"�.M°3v "�.� �,�e "+k '�` ,s�� '��� ��
... __. Th �.fk .L:f'�t.. �'bm��
����� �
�
� ���� c�n
�
� d
, � U
- 1 C
W
;, � ' • , ,�� 6Mp•��w�adnpuoyuo}�onoeq�poa�npuoyuo}�en�eq�e.�ayduo�\s}aajads�\s�\:s
e:\fs\fsprojects\lanphere\beavertonhonda\cad\beavertonhondapermit.dwg ' � � .
� � 5.k� r�Xt�Y'="rr.�.2 . .
��h,�`a.�?Z_`r .
�� � �� � w. .
�� '�'� ,�:•
�
�q � :� . . �
r
o�Q�
� °.Lpo � ��
[T s p N� i � il' -. °+A ,�
N(j�a��0 ` „. '�.. isl 4 �SlY
0 (�
`p��m0 .�1^.." .
V
V�
� �b�� ..� t�"
O� V (t 1.
(n vIJ su S�•j a i .
(.+u fT ci *'' . . ..
- ' _"" ._. . �::,... . .. _ � ..- �_.'.
c.+ c i5ck .�:�. . . ..... :..� .�.....: " � ' '
t� �1
� ,�f�-�t�,._.�. ��..�. - E .. "_Ss,- -' Y
__ •
� T � .. ��` � _. .--` - . - ' '{ +��� � �� ��' � ��a
�; � :. ..,:�
.� � w.
� "'R►� Y +
� - t y�"�.3�. ... ����v� � ._. � - Y , ���.. k '.:� �n1� c
�j 4 ""�,,.. . "� f.. ,t a.# a ; °(���t �+ ; '4Ltr .�;' �����+„{� .a { �..a � .. :y`ti� �'r
(� � a x:b,�`r r.w Sr���y��"'�; . Fre��� �� �. _ o �l#, �.'.?. ��.t,'^ � ,�z 'Y �t�i'*+c �1 V� y r..�}�r�l " �
� —� ,i� c'fi`-*_ ^Y au'�� �:.- +�.,.�, ����J:� N. � 'S.,i. i :�,F F 11 1� �C'y� `�`T"' +.��
p f.- ' � _-- 1 r ` � y�.x� ,�:�.�, r�"`� � t �� , � }
� � f � : { , � ,��,N, �1 .„ , �,
. . �a � , r�
. -. rt > : � �' ri � , �,
� � .. - ( � , �� � `� ' � �; F , r �
,._.;a� ,�t'. _
� G� ^ j 'i�"���ti.�. k �!�r .. T '.l °. .� i �' �. _ {i �tit Y� t ,p .���
0 D� �� �/� ;£ � � � ��,.t���t"4' Z'rf� � ^�,a k? t �: s y' � '� a�� '�' �' '�
V1 n� V I '�_ � � r �;��`"�� ,�,,. F,�-�..�'r;1� I ii J'?i .�ct+r��+a:: �
r � U `;I� ''M�J� � `y �f����^���f a-�"��7:a � Y..�j� � �..J .k .. - ��� ��� � -� �.r� � � . o�
' 'kY ..a a. .wp!,+. , .l!`
U) i.: a a . - . .. .
�.!' �
t,.
^n.. � . . -'�.
� :� �° "�'.
..«.. M�.-�.J�. ••r. � . ' r
. ��'.x�� .. . -
� �
fTl O � - IC ����++Ai:' � ��iy .*`"- t�',.�'�,'_"�'si' .�? � � . . . .. , a.�.� :� .- �.
� '•C.i . � . . J
. II .
� m �,� �I v •,. � ��s� � ::�K r� �.�� .��,�,� ��.�.� ! .��� � I
' .�� �.. � q��
� p� ' � �iµ�-�y�,�{� �+� �,�^`� s' ` ��� 3 ' �� � � '��� ' (
' � � ? �c � � � s•: - x
D L Z _: �,�-,�.+"' 4`� u:,�- ,q ,n�� ,�,�, '' �i .,'"" - . Y� 'y�y���. a
� �.� ,D ` `� . ��.� + �, , ,; ; 4,�.�
�� . . �::. �."C"�'"� .� a` �'�'�: xc, {� .,+�Mi► .7A�. �a.:,�
r= i �� �� ���f.', S 1�;� �� ,� �,� ,,„n�,� � r;� �.�.''� �. T> h, ;
'�'��#� � 4� �" �+�. �w� �' � I � . ' +� - �
� �' Rl '�`� �. x x `-"' ',' � i ,� ��` '�`" .r, -�a'""�.�!..,!�'�..�.�.#�,.,..,, f��tt r,
D � �`'�`,,�,.� ,� ' ' S "x=" �-h-`..`.�` < ,�
� �-
.:
-� 7 � .' .
,
o `' �'M � `i � � �ICll�t--� t . , � _,,
� �^ y�, ..� . - _ _ ,
� ��k� .�, _ ', .�3-t .:. �.,ti.,, _ .
�� � ' �
. � �`r J'" ' � �t�,�.'-� c �` ..�,t v���"�- �:-uy'Y� ; . .', �.+�
c. + a , � � a+N't irc ,nt� �.
�� ��.' ��� KvF � . '�,�A' ���3 ,� i#�6o cHna S .���, �� �t � �;r x� �. Kc, ;.
� T {
� i�� . .. .`^ ,�� � - �,�1 �:. ��. �. r a �i i h .r�
� ° ' ,._, _ ... .' i �
�t � 7
,�g ..�i � .:. .
' � �'�,�„+zf'°'� r e', ra}d R�.. S�' i � 'i G n�'S�� �' � ��� � ?.�,� .
yam,a'�',+�,I� � � ? S.a :"7?K. ,a�P�R� �, ..�' � • � � ,�` ) ,�j' � ,r..�5 � � � �L��'
� f a,.�c'�y : ,., ia Q � r, ; 1 �' ,:�:wi -� �- � ' r '-.. +&}.�.
��r11�� . F A�+` ' �.� . � f ': 2� _._� � f,e
LLt . . 5 •�r WW .� .
� �` .f�t,� S" �a^'"' �.. ��`�?"Ya`x4�_ ,�^` 7�, � , : � . _ _wr+e,s s a.am `°
t �; ��� .=a���;a,� . ,,.,, "'" -.'� � � �a!°1.� f . 1 �.�t� � _ t ` a,��,.�,,;,��-x.`�r» .._ " .�",.�„���'i
,
k4 �
y
I �T . , . .. r . `�}.�'� , . -z��, '•"'v+.., �..t,..ia«- e � .. . _ ... .,. . '�'^
�'� .[..,. '�V .'Y� � N = F y����[ y
!
I 1} = ., Y. 9y ����� � �'� �Y J ��� y .�3�.F�� k �'' � �- `�� �n .. �'~���
° �..�,�m- �
^� .. F �.�]ii' �'� t�„�� �� . . ��� . �� F •. �;*.K�fa �..:x �� T-.i
7 ' �� �S � i .�y,�����9� .... � ... °„� ' �,�' '�': k 7' '��_.a' 1�� � .
°� � f� ,;��,� �. �,�y Y , � +�.t Ws, ~� �
� „ r- �r 4!� �.s� r�'��� '1 . '� t�� ' �' i
t.r , >... . � j.� C w�� ��.�+ �� �
C.7 � _ ;s,.�y� i"bs`�k,.cG. `k .. I.. �" ��i�`• .,:ai` + Ak
�' � m J� 3 f� �t21 �,�'�`Q Y�,r�. �i .,___� `..� `fisK � � i
. ;
,;
_v --� --\' � I = r , � ��., .. - .2 �� .
\ � _ ._. A �rT �'.: �;�}� �`` � � ti'';;-'y � ���� � � � �et: I
`� �Z \ ` � .. ___. . � .
.� -,l ' -+:1�.. {.�^::..�� ,... .µ�.y�� �.z,�g �:rss$�� .... E �'-'�`�":��
- � f � .k., � :'9 ��'i{ � � _._ r '�`s" '�
, , , . .
� � � � '� K , . .
, ;
_ x... . ,....,� - �y , ..� r � �, , ,��� �� er.": �°" v. r�'� � s�.
� ��. � ��.
.. -� yK`�y:F. 7i� �� . F�y . ...� '�' ,�;,no��,, .
� E;� �I�f,:
�• � ��; � ��� �:.:-�,.. Ky;C�f,.� . ,yi� . ,�r �,� � .
St• y�
� c a. �w {��+ �'' ' r4 yy �. !s 'u7.
� i 1 .r� d� � � C ��: Q O
� .�' h d x'.�� r �h�� 1 +;' fa�r�`Z rY� � � ,"�s I !^ ` Z f`
�r� '� �-+.� �,.. .�+ �': ..�;� �r a �� 00
yr �.�, c,r�: ��� � � x '.r��� �j�-r���;;;� 4 ,"� �� �`g; '�r �� ,,� ti ,�q. I r� � � M
��..�� ,� , - t� .Y c �n'� h�1� " � �' :�^�; � � '� 1 / �/, �LI � W
��' .1 x '����r,.c�(,ar k � � a, ,^g ��` ,� b � % � � e— a � _
1 C' ry..s-5."y, � � ,9� S . �
+ ^ Y3 �I�SY�.FKR��i r.� •J �...Y f` 0 V�
� .l�'..�uafi iQ�4Y ,'3�'�e� ...i_ _J..��.4"�'• � ,�
." �
'� ,s'�i... ��:,, � i . ` �`a.. � + �
T` � _ '� t� � f �� O
�- j.,,9�-• �.'_ __ �•i�..�;ri. __�, -�,r ,. ,.'r�n�i�f# � � •A% ;!'� rl
VfL""r'_'�.,_._'r, � � ' � r a Jjt� -A ! � � ~ I � O
f� - - ; ,- �j ,� �:
, : �
� L J .. l � T ! \ e�
� 1 t t U
1Gpt " �� �•. Y p �*e' H � t'��4 � a�, .. � � .:�"�^ �k"' ��: f ` �
n
,^-+'T4y��rs_- � ,�� +1��� � s r.'�li" r .� �i�'. , . ?t' q � 0
+r �{{f � r^�'. �). rr' �,� � }�c �
i} � + . ' .A �� r .`T � � �F � � � �".;� ' � *� O. �Q N
�} � , 4 �.� r `,�� �, � � �
.�- Y ' ti � v " r � rl.�• 'irv�.6 y /'ia,1 t'{�� `,',^,"�n•�`�� m� }, �
�,., .. y � � �.^ F ..R r-. . ' i� '� j n r
l�y�...� •.A`�'�r`� 'Y:��'4:r.�i��y t��..I r �, ' a. :� .�l�� , �a1 1� �.•'`•.. :�• �'< 1 �;a�.�i ���•,. y ,
��• V� 4 � ` � ,�v Y�' ^` � `, T`,a{ '�: r.� �. �� �
�\ � r��4'��_ ��y.�M1 i�h J.�� -�: �t.�h.%`J'���1'f a� y, `��� �>~` y.
k,n. � �,1{��I ";IP �f ,,,� W n Y 1� � !L' ..�,j�� .- ;N +
,i• P� m .4a { �. � • n�y�.y y5y�t� `i' �.,.. � .i' � �
w' "'MLca`„�.,..�.�,-i : `''l`."t � '�''F' 1 r Y J;j� .i..� G�S. _ - ��. r
,��. � . w� � -; � ��
�P ���.4_�,�+�.'� a , . �'� r�:� :� � .. f v priwN'�r'�Gl,�r 1��n
'��- � d � w.i�. Y �� t n' # "� ir �.t�"ar�. � ° ' 0
�' l �;y� i t .s� � . .�� j .
�I p t,�y � �e:....f�`J yli}� 'a y+'a r � •� f. y y�i,l 7 � .. . � *r�, — U
•w. ,'����ii�f+ti+:yyp.j =+' �''X ll y� ,�"°�,�,FX,��.i�f��:/"r�a,Y�, .lE. �e �,:� A.��'�N I �� 2
�� �oap
` x r /r .� , i/ ,� _ ��. p O
_�k` . '�� `fi � ."i� ��y �1,,.�:-„'i' � - ^ � �d.' '� ,,� " ` � F
�r�,.. �.n y �� �v�•' .�T� . � � �, �..� �i n ~ .�`.
� � � ct1 � Y '^ ',�'„ :r,. �. U' C.)
� 'l Y !' -4 . � � RS � �ti f I / l� '?Y
�� t :.. w w! r ('�ti a. �� {:` . I l �'..k-'� � .�. � •J� ^`� � �
.. �X y, �t � � . r � �., i. .��1 � �tyti �yyM ti ,_ . � �t.
-_.,.�., ° •'C �.I+.I'�T.♦ . -r' r � !t . � ..� yc ' : . .�!,`r• /+ �� a
�,� �J, t �. . :. .� yyyp� y` Y� z d
������x��Y■, ot 4 � }. �i�,;�%� �ii ,r{•�Y-e,y��''��A:.� rw.t•p,P�r�'NtiLb�i n+� 4�L.+ .�� ��...,,, TM .�r .Y. r �. r .�- a o�Z Q
� t �'1 . �• ' � GI i y��,r !� J �h~l �r i �s:i .'k .1 �r,� � P� � �� �
�.�.,�`r � y, �..:`T f� � G,-- ��� �� f' � � �,v' ' n� . � ��.. S7�
����f r ,t +.. � � ;� ���a , ,h n r ��`�r' { �,��; � ,�a`�C . I T � � Z�� �
. �
� �r +'� .�i.'.� J'/ � �* ti . { � � :: t,,�
� ��.1�.'n .s, „F � " �� ..�1 M' r��` ,�?�+'`�"� �'��4�� `Yti�r. a��,: _ � '��- �.� �+ �� *�� 4 � W
� g �; 03
� � r.t i .�'• �� y• r ,r �E 1k Y '' .. µw.. � _ )° '� ,�� � 1+.�$� � (/� a
,^, .,,,y��,c , � : r i r. -y.�� . �� � . ��� J
r
' :`�.✓ ,�' r 4'". __�` ��1+�9Y�, ' `�` � �`�„� � m tn
� . < ��7� 'r /, � � �r �4 r Q Q �
- . ' ,,�rj''� _.'C r I'. py '' �3� ���` " �' " W tQ U' \
, : , ,+ .� �r' ,.� . O
� " Y ,.i.r 3n,+r,;: �4�� � ��j W
..r _r', ` � ' � ` �`,", � O
':�?"� ._,,v�jl ��'�?'�- ,,✓:. I � I' � �r�'�"� . CJ
✓' .+.r "� �. �.. ��� ri.� yr ,,. , ` '`` ♦ . � �
y�„"'r1�s -:,:�'h � , �,� ,. v ."� e{ F—
+ �a.� .��w��`� ' {,'' �J�,�-W �.�' j:I . �:' ' � �
\ ...r•`��'''��'�' �Y' (r 1 d ���."4 � � "� `°�' 7 ..�_. �_ �����L'S.RK� Y`�': _ �
,,,.,� ,r-Y�'� �i } ��� � —� t/I n.
,,,.•�0" !� •e"'' t .�i� �'' '� ,�� �v,� .at ',
�`_�yt+�+�^ � ;���v: -- � _ �, .. . ' Y 4 ����' � .
x�' I ' `. ' �p
,� � '� � .. . ` yT "''��T (•.,t�S` �}�� �N�� �
_y� °; ;r� ..�' ,�, � � �; ���A m
J . . �
.,f. _ r:�,, t _ o
4.r� '��y�7� '+�lf:' 1. � . � . � ��y�F�n QQ7� � �m�^nQ N
��i�� � .WV"1 � � ��.!✓`�r 'y�.. � .f.� ��. �� �. � �ij''.� ��' ..A �0.�7 . v�
� �
;_ . ; . ._ .. . TF . .� �
.{1 i �. '1.` ' ,� ..'.��. .. !�y�,.y,�.,�„�� . �p..�S�4xk�i,.,- .rS�� t� � `� � ,��~ � � `
.. . � �f
µ_.. � �,. 'a �^, � (� � �
3�rn. � �j
�_� �. ��4 . � .. . K��r'�''�-.�-�.. ,�,r�,�a`$e �'k�� Y,�4�'�,i��n� a��.xy4k�,�," ���.j� ���''' �3��
. ,
.
-. . "' Pd'`m�'M ��;`� +'�� � �° ��� . , �
t t Ry ; � . ' ..� �.,�'� �6� '�rdH\.JS��� �qy,1.� �u.�� `C�'� �. ' �.
w.�� ,� „'�y) �
. ..
'/�5,pz� . , .. �'�y. �y 5 �'4 � i.�A4eRV �.Ji�Ar t.,�'"r`� .,�,� � a�;r � ,.-��.� .....����_" . O
• �• � .b �^r� x �.i� , � i . .� .
. . ,y � ..
�r ;� ri�5 e r .A'tr,��iPan�� •� �4�b"t�,��,. � ;'�FS 4.�4���. -4�' ' n �
� N:` a s?�[�y....S i:, � .�i�l '��.�. � � �11 �
,. .. .., .� � � '. �� ,
.. y �ie..�.0�` r i k t7 +rh 'J r Y 'i. y x. 4��,. • E }�J�� �
^� p �� �r1�1 �
. n ✓�;sy`� rr'.�r����.� R�'r���'�Nyi n3x��+P•='k���'t1�4�,�'� �P"� � W�+�r���,�ct,'���' `� �
r r � t .a�: �!..r�V �:�•.� �� r.�. rr(�,+cr1L� .ti+j!P�'� '��rS,'^.'^+..�'`-`'yz� 3�' l^`'-:�.
• 6Mp�}luuad�puoyuo}.tenoaq\paa�apuoyuo�enoeq\a�aydu��,s�aejo�ds�\s;\:a
:' Ql� .
. � �
• �o��� C .
�..
y,�.
#�
/ �''� � /
� � ,I
;� ��
�;
Ili �
.� I�� �
,
� � � ;$ o
O �I��I�IW a
...i ,,, ',', �a
i I ii�li' �
. ;���`'�.. C
I ' �-
� J
� ��i �
� ; ,
a ' k�! Gl
I � `C
n i��i��j r
� �A
;'�I'i�� vI
3
�', ;�;I �
z
DITCH TO BE PIPED ,;I4���i; c�,
�ro�vZ ,�.t..so.s ---- �� �
�� �,i�� L
_ _ „ 'r _ . _ � 4�` �
' - - „ i y�
rn 10, I �
� - g V
� �
� �3 �
o ' s
r �
o �y �+
�.
L Q
� � �
O � �
j � r U
v �
v �
p ^ �
� �
C
O
�
C
O � _ '
` -- --
> 0� "
�
� . ' ,
,. .. . �. .
/ .� . _ ,u•iec scsc.toc ..
_ ; � . � w�G.
a ,
� c +�+ �+
i ..��..
� ' Corps File No. 200500107
�
o ��� �� SHEET T1TLE: OVERALL SITE �A�'
a � PROJECT: BEAVERTON HONDA 10/18/05
� ��� Flowing Sdutlonn 10685 SW GREENBURG RD
'� P�IanSW o8R7 97�Snue TIGARD OREGON SHEET N0.
/ Phone (503) 297-6331
;;. Fox (503) 297-6053 COE/DSL PERMIT APPLICATION 4��
;. � � .
,
- ,, fi ;,
--�Z--�'*� r �.
, � .
` 'L �P *P 9� / M'�o,��`sr
sdc,�-.AY / `� �'l�
. oPV / • e Z9�
�� Q�'P
O�p.G/ �yti��9
:i ��
y=�;. y���' .ye -
� Qs�
- v
��-
;t�� ,
�
�r�nect , �
ex�st' � g�. � �n
M
� . � a�� Q��� � n
�• ;`G Q,� Q
���,�; .�` .�1�� n 4 J
- ot� � ,� a
�;� � ;' ° � y� IIQ tA
;
__ � �� EXIS7ING uai� Z v
��� �� „ PAVING a � � Q
W
�' � '�` S�O�n��,�,at � � z
� „ , '� e,.F/o tn m p
� w__ H
_ . - , :. - ��,�,;-.�.� g
� •,� . o .' � , : � � J
�` � p � �
� �� • � a �
�_�
� �� \ i . .•C , • �r � . r . • � • . �
� V� �. M
€ � .' � �RC3P0°S.E� . tor� � �
. �
� �\ . , . �� PA�NG � � �ater w
� a .�
o ' �
c �_ �O �
� �� �\ .R . ,�... • : .,� �'V�_ J
o` � , ° � � - o • `•��-�.�-,- . �
� `� ' � . � r � . , ' �`• , y • �
e ,� p s_�
� �� . „�, . . . +
�� � v�. .p . �r � ..
� , , � .. � . ;, s ' '9 . ,±� . .p� ;2+ �
� ��� . .
� _ �.. . , � , r -. , t .
O !:t„( ' � F P � L •p • • � Or � ,.
C �� \ � � r . • r r♦. D . a p r 1�
°� e
o �..�.'..� r�
� �o
�
�
� In II trap �Ext�nd Pip�/Backfill Ditch ' �x -
� cat �a a# —
.� low= oi ts;� �x -� �
`� con to =;o,
�
� exi n SyStem Corps Ftle No. 200500107 :
'� � eo�tor�e sH�T nn.F; anr�:
� p PROJEC7: BEAVERTON HONDA 10/18/05
� ��f ���� 10685 SW GREENBURG RD SHEET N0.
�� P«u�d, ae �r� R b
m «(e���e�' COE/DSL PERMIT APPLICATION 5��
�nc�ln��are 1
� � �.
. �
l
CrossSection-1
,,i ���,: 120,0 t---- i ----.�._.^_.._:�__ 120,0 �
_ ...._— � ------E�fs�'tt�tg-____ , � ! --�
i '
x Ditch = � I ;
e:�
� i to be i10,0i-- ;----�- , --1110,0
,
I � � rL
� ,
Piped � 'A - � I
�x r
: 1 OO,OF _ . ,____�__.... IOO.O
CR£]S�� EC� -1 ' ^ HW
T
90.0�---- -- .__--�90,0
'" ' , OHW � i
0
80,0�;,�:,,,,,,�.�.�-��,�,-�;,r,..,, .,�,..,.:,�so,o
0
.� ,.
X
X �
O
IM
n
i
N
,al �,I �3
�
` iv
i�
��
;ui
x IN
�
3 a ;
�
�
.E �. ��I
� �',�—_�,E� �
� CROSSSEC ' -z
�
t CrossSection-2
c
° i 120,Or--- — 120,0
> ' f
a°� �o'x I
a �
0 4 110,0 110,0
� .x I � L �
� � � �
o � � 100,0` 100,0
�
o � �
� HW
� �;i ,., ���1 90,0 90,0
�
� - �
� ' �
r % X 80,0��-�az+r-a;- -i-a�i-�,-f-o-i �i+i-s-s-E-i i-i-a-M�-,a- 80,0
a
c
0
%
� Corps File No. 200500107
�o �,� �� SHEET r�nE: SECTIONS - OHW aA�'
a- `� PROJECT: BEAVERTON HONDA 10/18/05
� -�1f 33051nSW587th Avanue 10685 SW GREENBURG RD
y �r Portlond, oR s»s TIGARD OREGON SHEET N0.
/ Phone (503) 297-6331
�; FoX (503) 297-6053 COE/DSL PERMIT APPLICAl10N 6��
_ � � �
ROW
. . Varla b Phoss
�� • 2� 2 Vala
OCSTiNC PAyEyyp,�7 2X
�'�;:` ���'.�" v-�,:' PROPOSEp PAYp�EHi
. -�y `�. 1 SOIL� 3 .
�^ b.
�
, ^I
aarnHC cROUNO ''i, � ,
- �
� ,_ ; „
A-A 2�-4'RWND ROqC/$qL
suRF�ce ut�,s• niiac
PROPOSED SWALE CROSS SECTION w° �"�"
NTS
EXIST. A.C. --�_ g� DETECTABLE WARNING TAPE
�~� -
. _ �
.s,•.'�`��"r��` N
���o o e �e�e 0 �o�°• P�b� ro�.
�_ ..-'--_,- ti/.,_,,,,. d : o a . . --
24-27" CDF BACKFILL � ��'=''�'`'�''
� '�.� r�. .
OR 3,000 PSI CONCRETE Dr "
;�.
BEDDING _
6" MIN �"
CRUSHED ROCK 6" g"
MIN. MIN.
—^�- -�-- -..•--�.-
0 S
3 1• 12" PAVEMENT SECTION — 4" AC OVER 8" COMPACTED GRAVEL
v
�
E
�
a�
a
o X PIPE BEDDING �c BACKFILL
c CXX N.T.S.
0
�
�
a�
>
°' S WALE PLANTING�
i
° 1� Seed soil/rock with sloughgrass, wlldrye, Mannagrass
.� Z. Apply biodegradable coir fabric
� 3, Plant pointed rush and slough sedge nlong fringe,
0 4, Locate 1 redtwig dogwood every 3ft each slde of swale
� S, Locate 1 pacific ninebark every 6ft, each side of swale
>
� 6. Locate 1 nootka rose every 3ft each site, r�id-bank
` 7, Hand water during establishMent period,
�
L
Q '
C
O
/
� Corps File No. 200500107
U
'o �W� �� SHEET TITLE: DETAILS DATE:
�a � PROJECT: BEAVERTON HONDA 10/18/OS
� � fFlowlnq Solutione
3305 SW 87th Avanue 10685 SW GREENBURG RD SHEET N0.
w �' P�tiahd, oa 9�22s 11GARD, OREGON
/ Phone (503) 297-6331 ��7
�; Fax (503) 297-6053 COE/DSL PERMIT APPLICATION
�nr,Ic�SUr�- � �
a:�
Nationwide Permit General Conditions
� (From the January I5,2�02 Federal Register, Vol. 67, No. 10)
l. Navigation
2. Proper Maintenance
3. Sail Erosion and Sediment Controls
4. Aquatic Life Movements
5. Equipment
� 6. Regional and Case-by-Case Conditions
7. Wild and Scenic Rivers
8. Tribal Rights
9. Water Quaiity
10. Coastal Zone Management
11. Endangerad Species
12. Historic Properties
13. Notification
14. Compliance Certification
15. Use of Multiple Nationwide Permits.
16. Water Supply Intakes
17. Shellfish Beds
18. Suitable Material
19. Mi�igation
20. Spawning Areas
21. Management of Water Flaws
22. Adverse Effects fram Impoundments
23. Waterfowl Breeding Areas
24. Removal of Temporary Fills
25. Designated Critical Resource Waters
26. Fills Within 100-year FIoodplains
27. Construction Period
Encl.3
1
• '.�
C. Nationwide Permit General Conditions • .
The following General Conditions must be followed in order for any authorization by an NWP to be valid�
1. Nai�igation. No activity may cause more than a minimal adverse effect on navigation.
2. Proper Maintenarzce. Any structure or fill authorized shall be properly maintained, including maintenan�e to
ensure public safety.
3. Soil Erosion an�f Sediment Conu•ols. Appropriate soil erosion and sediment controls must be used and
maintained in effective operating condition during construction, and all exposed soil and other fills, as well as any
work below the ordinary high water mark or high tide line, inust be permanently stabilized at the earliest practicable
date. Perrruttees are encouraged to perfonn work within waters of the United States during periods of low-flow or
no-flow.
4. Aquntic Life Moveme�its. No activity may substantially disrupt the necessary life-cycle movements of those
species of aquatic life indigenous to the waterbody, including those species that normally migrate through the area,
unless the activity's primary purpose is to impound water. Culverts placed in streams must be instailed to maintain
low flow conditions.
5. Equipment. Heavy equipment working in wetlands must be placed on mats, or other measures must be taken to
minimize soil disturbance.
6. ReQional and Case-Bv-Case Conditions. The activity must comply with any regional conditions that may have
beeii added by the Division Engineer(see 33 CFR 330.4(e)). The activity must comply with any regional conditions
that may have been added by the Division Engineer(see 33 CFR 330.4(e))and with any case specific conditions
added by the Corps or by the state or tribe in its Section 40] Water Quality Certification and Coastal Zone
Management Act consistency determination
7. Wi/d and Scenic Rivers. No activity may occur in a component of the Narional Wild and Scenic River System; or
in a river officially designated by Congress as a"study river"for possible inclusion in the system, while the river is
in an official study status; unless the appropriate Federal agency, with direct management responsibility for such
river, has determined in writing that the proposed activity wi11 not adversely affect the Wild and Scenic River
designation, or study status. Information on Wild and Scenic Rivers may be obtained from the appropriate Federal
land management agency in the area(e.g.,National Park Service,U.S. Forest Service, Bureau of Land Managemen[,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service).
8. Ti-ibal Rights. No activity or its operation may impair reserved tribal rights, including, but not limited to, '
reserved water rights and treaty fishing and hunting rights.
9. Water Ouality. (a)In certain states and tribal lands an individua1401 Water Qt�ality Certification must be
obtained or waived(See 33 CFR 330.4(c)). (b)For NWPs 12, 14, 17, 18, 32,39,40,42,43, and 44,where the state
or tribal 40l certification(either generically or individually)does not require or approve water quality management
measures, the permittee must provide water quality management measures that will ensure that the authorized work
does not resu]t in more than minimal degradation of water quality(or the Coips determines that compliance with
state or local standards, where applicable, will ensure no more than minima]adverse effect on water quality). An
important component of water quality management includes stormwater management that minimizes degradation of
the downstream aquatic system, including water quality(refer to General Condition 21 for stormwater management
requirements). Another important component of water quality management is the establishment and maintenance of
vegetated buffers next to open waters, including streams(refer to General Condition 19 for vegetated buffer
requirements for the NWPs).
This condition is only applicable to projects that have the potential to affect water quality. While appropriate
measures must be taken, in most cases it is r�ot necessary to conduct detailed studies to identify such measures or to
require rnonitoring.
2
10. Co'astal.�one Manngement. Tn certain states,an individual state coastal zone management consistency
concurrence must be obtained or waived(see 33 CFR Section 330.4(d)).
11. Endangered Specie.�. (a)No activity is authorized under any NWP,which is likely to jeopardize the cpntinued
existence of a threatened or endangered species,or a species proposed for such designation, as identified undcr the
Federal Endan,gered Species Act(ESA}, or which will destroy or adverseiy modify the critical habitat of such
species. Non-federal permittees shall notify the District Engineer if any listed species or designated critical habitat
might be affected or is in the vicinity of the prqject,or is Iocated in the designated critical habitat and shall not begin
work on the activity unti:notified by the District F.r►gin�r that the requitements of the ESA have been satisfied and
that tha activity is authorized. For activities that may affect Federally-listed endangered or thrsatened species or
designated critical habitat, the nothcation must include the name(s)of the endangered or threatened species that
may be affected by the proposed work or that utilize the designated critical habitat that may be affected by the
proposed work, As a result of fonmal or informal consultation vc,���e FWS or NMFS the District Engineer may
add species-specific regional endangered species conditions to the NWPs.
(b)Authorization of an activity by a NWP does not authorize the"take"of a ttveatened or endangered species
as defined under the FSA. In the absence of separate authorization(e.g.,an ESA Section 10 Pernrit, a Biological
Opinion with"incidental take"provisions,etc.)from the USFWS or the NMFS,both lethal and non-teihal"takes"of
protected species are in violation of the ESA. Information on the location of threatened and endangered species and
their critical habitat can be obtained direcdy from the offices of the USFWS and IVMFS or their world wide web
pages at http://www.fws.gov/r9endspp/endspp.html and htip:!/www.nmfs.noaa.gov/prof res/overview/es.hhn
respectively.
_ 12• J`�istoric Properties. No activity which may affect historic properties listed,or eligible for listing,in the
National Register of Historic Places is authorized,until the bismict Engineer has complied with the provisions of 33
CFR Part 325,Appendix C. The prospective permittee musf notify the Distirict Engineer if the suthorized activity
may affect any historic properties listed,determined to be eligible,or which the prospective pern�ittee has reason to
believ"e"may be eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places,and shall not begin the acrivity until
notified by the District Engineer that the requirements of the National Historic Preservadon Act have been satisfied
and that the activity is authorized. Inforrrntion on the locarion and existence of historic resources can be obtained
from tfie State Historic Preservation Of�"ice and the National Register of Historic Places(see 33 CFR 330.4(g)). For
activities that may affect historic properties listed in,or eligible for listing ia,the National Register of Historic
Places,the noh�cation must state which historic property may be affected by the proposed work or include a
vicinity map indicating the location of the 6istoric property.
13. Noti ation.
(a)Timine:where required by the tertt�s of ihe NWP,the prospective permittee must notify the Dis�ict
Engineer with a preconstruction notifecation(PCI�as early as poss�ble. The District Engineer must determine if the
notiftcation is complete within 30 days of the date of re�eipt and can request additional information necessary to
make the PCN complete only once. However,if the prospective permittee dces not provide all of the requested
information,then the District Bngineer will notify the prospecrive perrm�tee tltat the nott,'ficatian is still incomplete
and the PCN review process will not cornmence until a11 of the requested inforn�ation has been received by the
District Engin�er. The prospectiv�permittee shall not begin the activity:
(1)Until notified in writing by the District Engineer thai the activity may proceed under the NWP with any
special conditions imposed by the District or Division Engineer;or
(2) If notified in wriring by the Dish-ict or Division Engineer that an Individual Pernzit is required;or
(3) Unless 45 days haye passed from the District Engineer's receipt of the complete notificarion and the
prospecrive permittee has not received written notice from tbe District or Division Engineer. Subsequently, the
permittee's right to proceed under the NWP may be modified,suspended,or revoked only in accordance with the
procedure set forth in 33 CFR 330.5(dx2).
(b) Contents of Notificat�,on:The notification must be in writing and include the following information:
(1)Name,address and telephone numbers of the prospective permittee;
(2) Location of the proposed project;
(3) Brief description of the proposed project;the project's purpose;direct and indirect adverse environmental
effects tht project would cause;any other NWP(s),Regional GencraJ Permit(s),or Individual Pernut(s)used or
intended to be used to authoriu any part of the proposed project or any related activity. Sketchcs should be
3
, � . :y.0
�
provided when necessary to show that the activity comp]ies with the terms of the NWP(Sketches usually clarify the
project and when provided result in a quicker decision.);
(4)For NWPs 7, 12, 14, 18, 21,34,38, 39,40,41,42, and 43, the PCN must also inciude a delineation of
affected special aquatic sites, including wetlands,vegetated shallows(e.g.,submerged aquatic vegetation, seagrass
beds),and riffle and pool complexes(see paragraph 13(�);
(5)For NWP 7 (Outfall Structures and Maintenance),the PCN must include information regarding the original
design capacities and configurations of those areas of the facility where maintenance dredging or excavatior. is
proposed;
(6)For NWP 14(Linear Transportation Projects),The PCN must include a compensatory mitigation proposal to
offset permanent losses of waters of the US and a statement describing how temporary losses of waters of the US
will be minimized to the maximum extent practicable;
(7)For NWP 21 (Surface Coal Mining Activities), the PCN must include an Uffice of Surface Mining(OSM)
or state-approved mitigation plan, if applicable. To be authorized by this NWP,the District Engineer must
deternune that the activity complies with the terms and conditions of the NWP and that the adverse environmental
effects are minimal both individually and cumulatively and must notify the project sponsor of this determination in
writing;
(8)For NWP 27(Stream and Wetland Restoration),the PCN must include documentation of the prior condition
of the site that will be reverted by the pernuttee;
(9) For NWP 29(Single-Family Housing),the PCN must also include: •
(i)Any past use of this NWP by the Individual Permittee and/or the permittee's spouse;
(ii)A statement that the single-family housing activity is for a personal residence of the permittee;
(iii)A description of the entire parcel, including its size,and a delineation of wetlands. For the purpose of this
NWP,parcels of land measuring '/.-acre or less will not require a formal on-site delineation. However,the applicant
shall provide an indication of where the wetlands are and the amount of wetlands that exists on the property. For
parcels�reater than Y-acre in size, formal wetland delineation must be prepared in accordance with the current
method required by the Corps. (See paragraph 13(fl);
(iv)A written description of all land(including,if available, legal descriptions)owned by the prospecti've
permittee and/or the prospective permittee's spouse, within a one mile radius of the parcel, in any form of ownership
(including any land owned as a partner,coiporation,joint tenant,co-tenant,or as a tenant-by-the-entirety)and any
land on which a purchase and sale agreement or other contract for sale or purchase has been executed;
(10)For NWP 31 (Maintenance of Existing Flood Control Projects),the prospective permittee must either
notify the District Engineer with a PCN prior to each maintenance activity or submit a five year(or less)
maintenance plan. In addition, the PCN must include all of the following:
(i) Sufficient baseline information identifying the approved channel depths and configurations and existing
facilities. Minor deviations are authorized,provided the approved flood control protection or drainage is not
increased;
(ii}A delineation of any affected special aquatic sites, including wetlands; and,
(iii)Location of the dredged material disposa]site;
(l 1)For NWP 33 (Temporary Construction,Access,and Dewatering}, the PCN must also include a restoration
plan of reasonable measures to avoid and minimize adverse effects to aquatic resources;
(12)For NWPs 39,43 and 44,the PCN must also include a written statement to the District Engineer explaining
how avoidance and minimization for losses of waters of the US were achieved on the project site;
(13)For NWP 39 and NWP 42,the PCN must include a compensatory mitigation proposal to offset losses of
waters of the US or justification explaining why compensatory mitigation should not be required. For discharges
that cause the loss of greater than 300 linear feet of an intermittent stream bed, to be authorized,the District
Enginecr must deterrnine that the activity complies with the other terms and conditions of the NWP, determ?ne
adverse environmental effects are minimal both individually and cumulatively, and waive the limitation on stream
impacts in writing before the pernvttee may proceed;
(14)For NWP 40(Agricultural Activities), the PCN must include a compensatory mitigation proposal to offset
]osses of waters of the US. This NWP does not authorize the relocation of greater tl�an 300 linear-feet of existing
serviceable drairiage ditches constructed in non-tidal streams unless, for drainage ditches constructed in intermittent
non-tidal streams, the District Engineer waives this criterion in writing, and the District Engineer has determined
that the project complies with all terms and conditions of this NWP, and that any adverse impacts of the project on
the aquatic environment are minimal,both individually and cumulatively;
(15)For NWP 43 (Stormwater Management Facilities), the PCN must include, for the construction of new
stormwater management facilities, a maintenance plan(in accordance with state and local requirements, if
4
app]icable)and a campensatory mitigation proposal to offset losses of waters of the US. For discharges tbat cause
the loss of greater than 300 linear feet of an intermiKent stream bed,to be authorized,t}�e bistrict Engineer must
deterntine that the activity complies with the other tcrazs and conditions of the NWp,deterinine adverse
environmental effeets are minimal both individually and cumulatively,and waive the limitation on stream impacts in
writing before the permittee may proceed;
(16)For NWP 44(Mining Activities}, the PCN musi include a desczipdon of all waters of the US adversely
affected by the project,a description of ineasures taken to minimize adverse effects to waters of the US,a
description of ineasures taken to comply with th�criteria of tbe NWP,and a reclarrtation platt(for alt aggregate
mining artiviries in isolaied waters and non-tidal wetlands adjacent to headwaters and any hard rock/rninera�nnining
activities);
(17)For activities that may adversely affect Pederally-listed endangered or threatened species, the PCN must
inelude the n.ame(s)of those endangered or threatened species that may be affected by the proposed work or uriiize
the designated critical habitat that may bc affected by the pzaposed work;and
(18)For activities that may affect historic properties listed in,or elig�bie for listing in,the National Register of
Historic Places,the PCN ruust state which historic property may be af{ected by the•proposed work or include a
vi�tinity map indicating the location of the historic propsrty.
(c)Form of Notihcation:The standard Individual Permit application form(Form ENG 4345)may be used as the
notification but must claarly indicate that it is a PCN and must include all of the information required in(b)(1)-(18)
of General Cond�hon 13. A letter containing the requisite information may a]so be used
(d)District En�ineer's Decision:In reviewing the PCN for the proposed activity,the District Engineer will
determine whether the acrivity authorized by the NWP will result in more than minimal individual or cumu]ative
adverse environinental effects or may be contrary to tlie public interest The prospective permittee may submit a
proposed mitigation plan with the pCN to expedite the process. The Dishict Engineer will consider any proposed
_ compensatory rttitigation the applicant has included in the proposal in determinin.g vvhether the net adverse
environmental effects to the aquatic environment of the proposed work are minimal. If the District Bngineer
deterriiines that the activity complies with the tercns and conditions of the NWP and that the adverse effects on the
aquatic environment are mizumal,after considering mitigation,the District Engineer will notify the pernuttee and
include=any conditions the District Engineer deenas necessary. '�e District Engineer�st approve any
compensatory mitigation proposal before the permittee commences work If the prospective permittee is required to
submit=a compensatory mitigation proposal with the PCN,the proposal may be either cQnceptual or detailed. If the
prospective permittce elects to submit a cou�pensatory mitigation plan with the pGN,the District$ngincer will
�xPedifiously review the proposed compensatory mitigation plan. The Dish�ict Engineer must review the plan within
45 days of receiving a complete PCN and determine whether the conceptual or specific proposed mitigation would
ensure no more ihan minima]adverse effects on the aquatic environment If the net adverse effects of the project on
the aquatic environment(after consideration of the com�ensatory mitigation proposal)are determined by the District
Engineer to be minimal,the Dishict Engineer wi11 provide a timely written response to the applicant The response
will state that the project can proceed under the tems and cottditions of the NWP.
If tbe Dishict Engineer detcrn�ines that thc adverse effects of the proposed work are more than minimal,then
the District Engincer will nodfy the applicant either:(1)that the project does not qualify for suthorization under the
NWP avd inshuct the applicant on the procedures to seek authorization under an Individual Pemut;(2)that the
project is suthorized under the NWP subject to the applicant's submission of a mitigation proposal that would
reduce the adverse effECts on the aquatic environment to the minimal level;or(3)that the project is authorized under
the NWP with specific inodifications or conditions. Where the District Engineer detemunes that midgation is
required to enswre no more than rmnimal adverse effects occur to the aquadc environment, the activity will be
authorized v,rithip the 45-day PCN period, T'he authorization will include the necessary coaceptual or specific
mitigation or a requirement that the applicant submit a mitigation proposal that would reduce the adverse effects on
the aquatic environment to the minimal 1cv¢l. When conceptual mitigation is included,or a mitigadon plan is
required:uider item(2)above,no work in waters of the US will occur until the District Engineer has approved a
specific mitigation plan.
(e)A¢ency Coordination:The Dish-ict Engineer will consider any comments from Federal and state agencies
concerning the proposed activity's cornpliance with the terms and conditions of the NWPs and the need for
mitigation to reduce tfie project's adverse environmental effects to a minimal level.
5
� s-
_ �_
For activities requiring notrf cacion to the District Engineer that result in the loss of greater than %z-acre of
waters of the US,the District Engineer will provide immediately(e.g.,via facsimile transmission,overnight mail, or
other expeditious manner)a copy to the appropriate Federal or state offices(USFWS,state naiural resource or water
quality agency,EPA, State Historic Preservation Officer(SHPO),and, if appropriate, the NMFS). With the
exception of NWP 37,these agencies will then have 10 calendar days from the date the matzrial is transmitted to
telephone or fax the District Engineer notice that they intend to provide substantive,site-specific comments. If so
contacted by an agency, the District Engineer will wait an additional 15 calendar days before making a decision on
the notification. The District Engineer will fully consider agency convnents received within the specified time
frame, but will provide no response to the resource agency, except as provided below. The District Engineer will
indicate in the adrrunistrative record associated with each notification that the resource agencies'concerns were
considered. As required by Section 305(b)(4)(B)of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management
Act, the District Engineer will provide a response to NMFS within 30 days of receipt of any Essential Fish Habitat
conservation recommendations. Applicants are encouraged to provide the Co�ps multiple copies of notifications to
expedite agency notification.
" (fl Wetland Delineations: Wetland delineations must be prepared in accordance with the current method required
by the Corps (For NWP 29 see paragraph(b)(9)(iii)for parcels less than '/.-acre in size). The permittee may ask the
Corps to delineate the special aquatic site. There may be some delay if the Corps does the delineation. Furthermore,
the 45-day period will not start until the wetland delineation has been completed and submitted to the Corps, where
appropriate.
14. Compliance Certi�cation. Every permittee who has received NWP verification from the Corps will submit a
signed certificarion regarding the completed work and any required mitigation. The certification will be forwarded
by the Corps with the authorization letter and will include: (a)A statement that tl�e authorized work was done in
accordance with the Corps authorization, includicig any general or specific conditions;
(b)A statement that any required mitigation was completed in accordance with the permit conditions; and(c)The
signature of the pernuttee certifying the completion of the work and mitigation.
15. Use ofMultiDle Nalionwide Permits. The use of more than one NWP for a single and complete project is
prohibited, except when the acreage loss of waters of the US authorized by the NWPs does not exceed the acreage
limit of the NWP with the highest specified acreage limit(e.g. if a road crossing over tida]waters is constructed
under NWP 14, with associated bank stabilization authorized by NWP 13,the maximum acreage loss of waters of
the US for the total project cannot exceed 1/3-acre).
16. Water Supplv Intakes. No activity,including structures and work in navigable waters of the US or discl-,arges of
dredged or fill material,may occur in the proximity of a public water supply intake except where the activity is for
repair of the public water supply iiitake structures or adjacent bank stabilization.
]7. Slzell ish Beds. No activity, including structures and work in navigable waters of the US or discharges of
dredged or fill material,may occur in areas of concentrated shellfish populations,unless the activity is directly
related to a shellfish harvesting activity authorized by NWP 4.
18. Suilable Material. No activity, including shuctures and work in navigable waters of the US or discharges of
dredged or fill material, may consist of unsuitable material(e.g.,trash, debris, car bodies,asphalt, etc.) and material
used for construction or discharged must be free from toxic pollutants in roxic amounts(see Section 307 of the
CWA). '
�]9. Miti ation. The District Engineer will consider the factors discussed below when determining the acceptability
of appropriate and practicable mitigation necessary to offset adverse effects on the aquatic environment that are
more than minimal.
(a)The project must be designed and constructed to avoid and minimize adverse effects to waters of the US to the
maximum extent practicable at the project site(i.e., on site).
(b) Mitigation in all its forms(avoiding, minimizing, rectifying,reducing or compensating) will be required to the
extent necessary to ensure that the adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal.
(c) Compensatory mitigation at a minimum one-for-one ratio will be requii•ed for all wetland impacts requiring a
PCN, unless the District Engineer determines in writing that some other form of mitigation would be more
6
..
environmentally appropriate and provides a project-specific waiver of this requirement. Consistent wi#h National
policy,the District Engineer will esiablish a preference for restoration of wetlands as compensatory mitigarion�vy�th
preservation used only in exceptional circumstances.
(d}Compensatory mitigation(i.e.,replacement or substiturion of aquatic resources for tiiose impacted)will not be
used to increase the acreage losses allowed by the acreage limits of some of the NWPs. For example, '/,-acre of
wetlands cannot be created to change a'/.-acre loss of wetlands to a'/:-acre loss associated with NWP 39
verificadon. However, %-acre of creatsd wetlands can be used to reduce the impacts of a %-acre loss of wetlands to
fl�e minimum irapact levcl in order to meet the mininqa]impact requirement associated with NWps,
(e)To be practicable,the mitigation must be available and capable of being done considering costs,exisring
technology,and logistics in light of the overail project putposes. Examples of mitigarion that may be appropriate
and practicable include,but are not}imited to:reducing the size of the projech,establishing and maintaining wetland
or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams;and replacing losses of aqualic resource
functions and values by creating,restoring,enhancing,or preserving similar functions and values,preferably in the
same watcrshed.
(�ComQensatory mitigation plans for projects in oz near streams or other open waters wiil normalIy include a
requirement for the establishment,maintenance,and legal protection(e.g.,easements,deed restrictions)of vegetated
buffers to open waters. �n many cases, vegetated buffers wiil be the only compensatory mitigation required.
Vegetated buffers should consist of native species. The width of the vegetated buffers required will address
documented water quality or aqnatic habitat loss concerns. Nornrally,the vegetated buffer wfll be 25 to SO feet wide
on each side af the stream,but the District Engineers may require slighdy wider vegetated buffers to address
d�cumen�ed water quality ar habitat loss coneetns. Where botb R,�t�ds and open waters euist oa the project site,
the Corps will determine the appropriate compensatory mitigation(e.g.,stream buffers or wetlands co�ensarion)
based on what is best for the aquatic environment on a watershed basis. In cases where vegetated buffers are
determined to be the most appropriate form of comp�nsatary mitigabaq thc District Engineer may waive or reduce
the requirement to provide wetland compensatory mitigation for wedand impacts.
�8)�mpansatory mitigation proposals sabmitted with the "notification"rnay be either conceptual or detailed. If
�onceptual plans are approved under the verificatioq then the Corps wil]condition the verification to require
detailed plans be submitted and approved by the Corps priar to construction of the authorized activity in waters of
the US.
_ (h)Permittees may propose the use of mitigation banks,in-lieu fee artangements or separate actiyity_specifi�
compensatory mitigation. In all cases that require compensatory mitigatioq the mitigation pravisions will specify
�ie party responsble for accomplistung and/or complying with the mitigation plan.
24. Spawning Areas_ Activities,including struchues and work in nayigable waters of the US or discharges of
dredged or fili material, in spawning areas dttring spawning seasons must be avoided to the maximum extent
practicable. Activities that result in the physical des�uction(e.g.,excavate,filI,or smother downstream by
substantial tnrbidity)of an important spawning area aze not authoriud.
21. ManaPement o,�Water Flows. To the maximum extent practiaable,the activity must be designed to maintain
preconsttuction downstream flow conditions(e.g.,location,capacity,and flow rates). Furthermore,the activity
must not permanently resh-ict or impede the passage of normal or expected tugh flows(unless the primary gurpose
of the fill is to impound waters)and the struchue or discharge of dredged or fill material must withstand exp�cted
high flows. The acdvity must,to the maxittwm extent pracqcable,provide for retaining excess flows from the site,
provide for maintaining surface flow rates from the site similar to preeonstruction conditions,aud provide for not
increasing water flows from the project site,relocating waier,ar re�directing water flow beyond preconstruction
conditions. Stream channelizing will be reduced to the minimal amoua�necessary,and the activity rrxust,to the
maximum extent practicable,reducc adversc effects such as flooding or erosion downstream apd upstream of the
project site,unless the activity is part of a larga system designed to maaage water flows. In most cases,it will not
be a requirernent to conduct detailed studies and monitoring of water flow.
This conditian is only applicable to projects that have the potential to affect waterflows. While appropriate
rneasures must be takcn,it is not necessary to conduct detailed studies to identify such measures or require
monitoring to ensure their ef�'ectiveness. Norn�ally, the Corps will defer to state and local�uthorities regarding
rnanagement of water flow.
7
+` il
' I
.- � I
• I
22. Adve�se E ects From Im oundn:ents. If the activity creates an impoundn�ent of water, adverse effects to the '
aquatic system due to the acceleration of the passage of water, and/or the restricting its flow shall be minimized to �
the maximum�xtent practicable. This includes structures and work in navigable waters of the US,or discharges of
dredged or fill material.
;
23. Waterfo�vl Br•eeding Areas. Activities,including structures and work in navigable waters of the US or
discharges of dredged or fill material, into breeding areas for migratory waterfowl must he avoided to the maximum
extent pracricable.
24. Removal o Tempora�y Fills. Any temporary fills must be removed in their entirety and the affected areas
returned to their preexisting elevation.
25. Desi�rzated C��itical Resource Waters. Critical resource waters include,NOAA-designated marine sanctuaries,
National Estuarine Research Reserves, National Wild and Scenic Rivers,critical habitat for Federally listed
threatened and endangered species, coral reefs,state natural heritage sites, and outstanding national resource waters
or other waters officially designated by a state as having particular environmental or ecological significance and
identified by the District Engineer after notice and opportunity for public comment. The District Engineer may also
designate additional critical resource waters after notice and opportunity for comment.
(a)Except as noted be]ow, discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the US are not authorized by
NWPs 7, 12, 14, 16, 17,2l, 29, 31, 35, 39,40,42,43,and 44 for any activity within,or directly affecting, critical
resource waters, including wetlands adjacent to such waters. Discharges of dredged or fill materials into waters of
the US may be authorized by the above NWPs in National Wild and Scenic Rivers if the activity complies with
General Condition 7. Further, such discharges may be authorized in designated critical habitat for Federally listed
threatened or endangered species if the activity complies with Genera]Condition 11 and the USPWS or the'1MFS
has concurred in a determination of compliance with this condition.
(b)For IVWPs 3, 8, 10, 13, 15, 18, 19,22, 23,25, 27,28, 30,33,34, 36,37,and 38,r�otification is required
in accordance with General Condition 13, for any activity proposed in the designated critical resource waters
including wetlands adjacent to those waters. The District Engineer may authorize activities under these NWPs only
after it is determined that the impacts to the critical resource waters will be no more than minimal.
26. Fills Within 100-Year Floodnlains. For purposes of this General Condition, 100-year floodplains will be
identified through the existing Federal Emergency Management Agency's(FEMA)Flood Insurance Rate Maps or
FEMA-approved local floodplain inaps.
(a) Dischar�es in Floo�lain�Below Headwaters. Discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the US
within the mapped 100-year floodplain, below headwaters(i.e. five cfs),resulting in permanent above-grade fills,
are not authorized by NWPs 39,40,42,43,and 44.
(b) Discharees in Floodway� Above Headwaters. Discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the US
within the FEMA or locally mapped floodway,resulting in permanent above-grade filis, are not authorized by
NWPs 39, 40,42,and 44.
(c)The pernvttee must comply with any applicable FEMA-approved state or local floodplain management
requirements.
27. Construction Period For activities that have not been verified by the Corps and the project was commenced or
under contract to commence by the expiration date of the NWP(or modification or revocation date), the work must
be completed within 12-months after such date(including any modification that affects the project).
For activities that have been verified and the project was commenced or under contract to commence within the
verification period, the work must be completed by the date detemuned by the Corps.
For projects that have been verified by the Corps, an extension of a Cotps approved completion date may
requested. This request must be submitted at]east one month before the previously approved completion date.
8
t
� � � , Portland District Regional Conditions
(a)In-water Work Windows: No ESA-listed species will be impacted as a result of this project. There are
no State preferred in-water work windows for the project area.
(b)Upland Disposal: All excess material will be taken to a suitable upland location for disposal. The
material shall be placed in a location and manner that prevents its discharge into waterways or wetlands.
(c) Heavy Equipment: Heavy equipment shall be operated from the bank and not placed in the stream
unless specifically authorized by the District Engineer. Heavy equipment must be placed on mats or similar
precautions must be taken to minimize damage to wetland resources.
(d) Fish Screening: Fish Screening will comply with standards approved by the National Marine Fisheries
Service or the Oregon Department of Fish& Wildlife, as appropriate.
(e) Cultural Resources & Human Burials: Permittees must immediately notify the District Engineer if at
any time during the course of the work authorized, human burials, cultural resources, or historic properties,
as identified by the National Historic Preservation Act, may be affected. Failure to stop work in the area of
exposure until such time the Corps has complied with the provisions of 33 CFR 325, Appendix C, the
National Historic Preservation Act and other pertinent regulations, could result in violation of state and
federal laws. Violators are subject to civil and criminal penalties.
(fl Fish Passage: Permittee shall insure activities authorized by nationwide permit will not restrict passage
of aquatic life. Activities such as the installation of culverts or diversion structures, or other modifications
to channel morphology must be designed to be consistent with fish passage standards developed by,the
Oregon Depariment of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) and the National Marine Fisheries Servicc (NMFS). The
standards can be found in the document entitled "ODFW standards and Criteria for Stream Road Crossings":
The streambed shall be returned to pre-construction contours after construction unless the purpose of the
activity is to elirninate a fish barrier.
(g)Riparian Vegetation Protection &Restoration: When working in waters of the United States or
riparian areas the construction boundary shall be minimized to the maximum extent practicable. Permittee
shall mark and clearly define the construction boundary before beginning work. Native riparian vegetation
will be successfully established along tributaries where the vegetation was removed by construction. The
plantings shall start at the ordinary high water mark and extend 10 feet back from the top of the bank. The
plantings must be completed by the end of the first planting season following the disturbance.
(h)Erosion Controls: All practicable erosion control devices shall be installed and maintained in good
working order throughout construction to prevent the unauthorized discharge of material into a wetland or
tributary. The devices shall be installed to maximize their effectiveness,e.g.. sediment fences shall generally
be buried or similarly secured. These controls shall be maintained until permanent erosion controls are in-
place.
�nclosur� �
�-
Practicable erosion control measures include but are not limited to the following:
a. Fill is placed in a manner that avoids disturbance to the maximum practicable extent (e.g.placing
fill with a machine rather than end-dumping from a truck).
b. Prevent all construction materials and debris from entering watenvay; �
c. Use filter bags, sediment fences, sediment traps or catch basins, silt curtains, leave strips or berms,
Jersey barriers, sand bags, or other measures sufficient to prevent movement of soil;
d. Use impervious materials to cover stockpiles when unattended or during rain event;
e. Erosion control measures shall be inspected and maintained daily to ensure their continued
effectiveness;
f. No heavy machinery in a wetland or other waterway;
g. Use a gravel staging area and construction access;
h. Fence off planted areas to protect from disturbance and/or erosion; and
i. Flag or fence offwetlands adjacent to the construction area.
(i)Maps and drawings: In addition to the items required in Nationwide Permit General Conditions 13, all
preconstruction notifications shall contain maps showing the project location as well as plan-view and cross-
sectional drawings showing the proposed �vork. The map(s) shall be of a scale and detail to clearly identify
the project location(s). Drawings shall be sufficient in number and detail to accurately portray the project.
(j)Bank Protection: Rip-rap shall be clean, durable, angular rock. The use of other materials such as
broken concrete, asphalt, tires,wire, steel posts or similar materials is not authorized. The project design
shall minimize the placement of rock and maximize the use vegetation and organic material such as root
wads to the extent practicable. Riparian plantings shall be included in all project designs unless the
permittee can demonstrate they are not practicable. The permittee must notify the District Engineer in
accordance with nationwide permit general condition#13 for any activity that includes bank stabilization.
(k)Inspection of project site: The permittee must allow representatives of the Corps to inspect the
authorized activity to confirm compliance with nationwide permit terms and conditions. Personnel from the
Oregon Department of Environmental Quality and the Deparhnent of Land Conservation and Development
are considered to be authorized "representatives"for the purpose of Section 401 Water Quality or Coastal
Zone Management inspections. For projects on tribal land the Environmental Protection Agency is
considered an authorized representative. A request for access to the site will normally be made sufficiently
in advance to allow a property owner or representative to be on site with the agency representative making
the inspection.
(1) Sale of property/transfer of permit: If you sell the property associated with this permit, you must
transfer the perrnit to the new owner(s) and obtain their signature(s). A copy of this permit with the new
owner(s) signature shall be sent to this office to validate the transfer of this permit authorization
Enclosure �?
4 •
- Oregon Department of Environmental Quality
Conditions for Compliance with Section 401 of the Clean Water Act
1. Turbidity/Erosion Controls-The pennittee shall ensure the authorized work does not cause the
turbidity of affected waters to exceed 10% over natural background turbidity 100 feet do�vnstream fi-om
the activity causing the turbidity. For projects proposed in areas with no discernible gradient break
(gradient of 2%or less), monitoring must be done at 4 hour intervals and the turbidity standard may be
exceeded for a maximum of one monitoring interval per 24 hour work period provided all practicable
_control measures have been implemented. This turbidity standard exceedance interval ap�lies onl�to_.____
coastaITowlands an oo pla� ins, vaIIey bottoms and other low-]ying and/or relatively flat land. For
projects in all other areas, the turbidity standard may be exceeded for a maximum of 2 hours (limited
duration)provided all practicable erosion control measures have been implemented.
Turbidity must be monitored during active in-water work periods. Monitoring points must be at an
undisturbed site(representative background) 100 feet upstream from the turbidity causing activity(i.e.,
fill or discharge point), 100 feet downstream from the fill point, and at the point of fill. A turbidimeter
is recommended, however, visual gauging is acceptable, Turbidity that is visible over background is
considered to exceed the standard.
Practicable erosion control measures must be implemented. Such measures must include, but are not
limited to, the following:
a. Place fill in the water using methods that avoid disturbance to the maximum practicable extent(e.g.
placing fill with a machine rather than end-dumping from a truck).
b. Prevent all construction materials and debris from entering waterway;
c. Use filter bags, sediment fences, sediment traps or catch basins, silt curtains, leave strips or berms,
Jersey barriers, sand bags, or other measures sufficient to prcvent movement of soil;
d. Use impervious materials to cover stockpiles when unattended or during rain event;
e. Erosion control measures shall be inspected and maintained daily to ensure their continued
effectiveness;
f. No heavy machinery in a wetland or other waterway;
g. Use a gravel staging area and construction access;
h. Fence off planted areas to protect from disturbance and/or erosion; and
i. Flag or fence off wetlands adjacent to the construction area.
Turbidity must be measured(or visually assessed)and recorded at the designated monitoring interval
prescribed above during periods of active construction. The designated person attending the monitoring
equipment shall be responsible for notifying the project foreman of any exceedance of the turbidity
standard. If a 10%exceedance of the background level occurs at 100 feet below the project site,modify
the activity causing the problem and continue to monitor at the proper interval. If exceedances occur with
two consecutive measurements the activity causing the turbidity must be stopped until the problem is
resolved.
Enclosure �.
�� .
�. '
. 2. In-Water Work Periods-Al] in-water work, including temporary fills or structures,may be
und'ertaken only during the time periods recommended by Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife
� (ODFW) for in-water work specified in the most current version of Ore�on Guidelines for Timing o�In
Water Work to Protect Fish and Wildli e Resources. An exception is allowed only with specific
approval from the USACE after consultation with ODFW or National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS). On tribal lands, the USACE will coordinate exceptions with the U.S. Environmental Agency
(USEPA)
3. Riparian Vegetation Protection and Restoration-Riparian,wetland, and shoreline vegetation in the
project area must be protected�i-om disturbance to the maximum extent possible and be restored and
enhanced when unavoidably disturbed due to activities associated with the authorized work. All
damaged or destroyed vegetation must be replaced with native plant materials. The standard for success
is 75% areal coverage after the fifth growing season for native plant species that replace the habitat type
lost or damaged. Planted areas must be temporarily fenced, or othen�vise protected from damage, until
the vegetation is established. Project sites must be revegetated to the extent possible up to the bankfull
stage or line of non-aquatic vegetation, whichever is greater. When any wetland areas are adversely
affected, revegetation must extend to the upland limits of the wetland area.
4. Storm�vater- Stormwater from any authorized activity, conveyed or discharged to a water of the state,
must be treated by a facility specifically designed to remove stormwater contaminants before entering
streams, wetlands, or other waters of the state, including mitigation wetlands, so as to minimize
pollutants entering those water bodies.
5. Bank Stabilization-The linear threshold for bank stabilization projects under any nationwide is 250
feet. All projects exceeding the threshold require individual water quality certification.
a. Bioengineering is required: Native plantings, such as willow saplings, must be incorporated into
stream bank stabilization structures in order to provide bank erosion protection, variable habitat for
wildlife, and shade. [See the Division of State Lands Guidelines On Riparian Restoration•
Bioengineerin.g, included in their 1996 Erosion Control General Authorization.]
b. The project must not include retaining�valls, bulkheads, gabions or similar vertical structures.
�nCloSUre �.
.. '.
.
. �
Compliance Certification
v
Project County:
Permit Number: �� ��'�j���
Date of Issuance:
Name of Permittee:
I hereby certify that the �vork �uthorized by the above referenced permit, has been
completed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the said permit, aud that
required mitigation �vas completed in accordance with the permit conditions, except as
described below.
Signature of Permittee
Enc15
� I
• , � ,
�-
��� �
CleanWater Services �
f)i�r �uiiititi�tu��>>1 i. �I��.i�
��C���
September h g, 2aas SEP ti '� Zfl05
Lanphere Ent�erprises
12520 S.W. Canyon Rd.
geaverton, OR 97005
RE: Replace Ditch with Culvert and Cre�tion of New Swale/Linear Poad at 10655
8 10885 S.W.Greenburg Raad, Tigard, OR(1S135bb007Q0� 800)
CWS#QS-000037
�
Clean Water Services has received your Sensitive Area Certification for the above
r�ferenced site. The project site contains a sensitive area (drainage)that flows from
north to south through the site. The {xoject is to consist of a number of proposed
activit�es: 1.)replacing the ditch at westem edge of Tax lot 800 with a culvert and
creating a new water quality swaie/linear pond at the southem ed'ge of Tax lot 800.
District staff has reviewed the submitted materials including site cqnditions and the
description of your project. Based on the submitted materials and a staff site visit on
January 13, 2005, it appear5 that no vegetaGed buffer applies to the sensitive area
(dr�inage) since existing impervioUS surfaces ext�nd to the edge of the drainage.
Further, the proposed activity is not considered redevelopment since less than 10
percent of the exiSting impervious area wlthin 100 feet of the sensitive are�a will be
altered. In I�yht of this result, this document will serve as your Service prnvider letter as
required by Resolution and Order 049, Section 3.02.1, and your�tormwater Connection
Permlt authorization from Clean Water ServiCes as re�uired by Orcfinance 27, 5ection
4.B. A11 requfred permits and �pprovals 1�rtust be obtained and corr�pleted under
applicable local, state, and federal law.
This letter does NOT eliminate the naed to prot�ct Sensitive Ar�es if they are
subsequetttly identified on your site.
Thia Serviee�rov�der Lettcr is not vsl�id unless CVVS-approved eite plan is ottac�S
1f �'h�u�e eny questions, please feel free to call me at 503-681��13.
� � �
�Y,.
�
s Case�►'�
nvi ntal PI R iew
'� Attachments ( �
Cc. Peter F. Fry :
E:�Acv��opmicrn gres�SP 00-riSPR Lenayll S 135BA00'100,800 add new aroesi�und replate culvert 091405 CW 5N 05�000037.doe
�
2550 SW Hillsboro Highway• Hillsbpro,Oregon 971d3 �
Phone'biZ'�1•360�90'ON503)681-3603 •www.�leanWaterSCrviCeg��T?I�IN7i�i� ���u.x�w� �� �.�_„ ..----- �
�
.f � � ' .
a .
�,is�f6p�cjacE��lenpf►ete�6aavarlonhondo,cad�beovxtonhondapamitdwg �.
I �� /
? �� " c=.---`� � , i � 1. •�r C (l� �.'� �L � f'J
m � � ; , � ,
� --------- _ rove�
� ; - . - -_ - - - = -_-= r-.-_..��_ --_ � ea a S�roic�s
�— �E� �a ,�� f�� r�:�.�sf:{.. C,..'
° ����� t � li1.�1� - - .�.__�- C c��'��� �
mu� �. �_.�.— --- - ���..__.__--- .
g �§�g� - -__ ��.,� - --�.�..�. �,��� �L i�� -��<<i- � z
� �� : J
:�� � -� � }. .� .__.�...�_ � � .�1= -----T,
���- ,
-a �n ( -- � _r-----------�---=--� �
�o = l .
is � � �'
� � � �.;� •`� �,�
e� �om � � ,'- .._._ ,? , Y r+
a � �
D�' ., .1 �� �,
-� _.
� �Z � ��, .� � LOT 1
� ��� � ,` LOT Z ,,, . .
�,,
n p� z� r � �
� �
ca
1 � � �,. �:t �
� � o � t
' �J
e � :� . : �� ' �df'
� �t` ' _ .�_•"-- "� -
�. i
L '.� _ --- -- - �_- � �4? ---- � - --- - _ _ — __ _--
`_ • t- - ��-.--�- - --
1 f �A}•-— —'�—-- - — - -`a- ....---- =�-- • ��---'- -iVf -! - -- — -- �
_,r.. --- �,,:� ��_.,.: ,,-���_ �- � ine
= -- --_ - -- -�--�-------- -- --------- . ------------ ---__ _...----__. _ --�----
� -
' � R�pflace.Dttch with Cufvert, Create New Swale/tJnear Pond
; � o
, �,
, � � �
� °�' � o
�
�
` , I
"--"�a z —°-- '
� m
�,•.� 9�� j�4
r
���� ��
�o� �c+9�
5�� Z��
. v�
Connect to� W
�
a�g � �
, ODO� t�all t��a � � �
O
� ti�� ~�q J
� � � �
!1 ,�
EXISTING � n �
z '�
PA1/�1VCs � !V-�
4 � �°� �
0
5�r�� � M � �
� ��� � � 0 .
A. � ^
. c4_ � �
� � a,....- _,-, _
, �w�. . ,. *; n
� �, \.'J I� (J `
�� ry�w j `� � i �
� PROPOSED St � Z
m`•�} �{� �� 1� ��• � M
�-:� �cr� .� PAYING ��•'�ter ' �
c o L. � :.
b� °�� -,; ��Oj�y� �
�. �_ �
m� �� :..� a s u _
�r � .� ' PI: �+6 _ . .
J"� � � � '
� � J . �i�w�
� �+�Oxa �e c �/'
� ��0 f,,.
' ° �rr ' 1� tra�����nc0 Pig�/ga�k�ell D�tch - . ,
� a:at �sien�a� ''�- p ti �� -
.� Bo1M D Ii�tS� '� s` �' _ . j 1 ��i
o C�f�l1 C�bl� J� � .� 1�! �_:�
� � � �° � j,�
exi , i syste� ;
� ' ,�
� R,�s� �M�;r r�n.F: p p w � oa�:
"' a �rti �oluneno PROJECT: BEAVERTON WONDA 8/28/05
� �M `+.,�►a71ti Avenue ��� SYV GREEN6URG RD
� �ia P�tb�`d'o� °�azs T� � N SHEE'T N0.
''- Phon.�)�/—s�t
m F�< sa�-eaa COE/b5L P�RMIT APPLICAT1pN 5�6
b�C'd E90'ON �xrL�v����� �.��� �.,,,� ,. .-- - -
N
_ �>i� ,
�� �
+ ��" ����
_ � ���� ��-� re on
. d° � Department of State Lands
�� � �
, :r; . _
� �; •'� � �i 5 Summer Street NE,Suite 100
�S'�;
•—'=`' %' ���,�����,����[z K�,1�n �skt,c��,����,,,� Salem,OR 97301-1279
�1859_=' �
(503)378-3805
October 26, 2005 PAX(503)378-4844
���«��v.oregonstatelands.us.
LB600/33986 State Land Board
PETER FRY
2153 SW MAIN ST., N�. 105 T1leodore R. Kulongoski
PORTLAND, OR 97205 Governor
Re: State Application Number 33986-NSP Bill Bradbury
Unnamed Ditch, Lamphere Enterprises Secretary of State
Randall Edwards
Dear Mr. Fry: State Treasurer
We have received your application pipe a ditch in Section 35, Township 1 S, Range 1 W, Tax
Lots 700 and 800, Washington County, Oregon. The Department of State Lands requires a
permit if you plan to remove, fill or alter 50 cubic yards or more of material within the banks of
most waters of the state or designated wetlands. State-designated Essential Salmon Habitat
streams and State Scenic Waterways are exceptions in that any amount of removal, fill or
alteration typically requires a permit.
Based on your application, your project involves removal or filling of less than 50 cubic yards of
material in waters that are NOT CURRENTLY DESIGNATED Essential Salmon Habitat or State
Scenic Waterways. Therefore, a state removal-fill permit is not required. Please be advised, all
new stream/road crossings must meet Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife criteria for
providing fish passage.
You must also receive authorization, when required, from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
and local planning department before beginning construction. Please be aware that you must
comply with Oregon Fish Passage Laws. Contact your local Oregon Department of Wildlife
office for more information.
If you have any questions, please call Louise Bos at (503) 378-3805, extension 231.
Sincerely,
c� G �� v " �n�r�-�` I
Michael Morales
Western Region Operations Manager
Wetlands and Waterways Conservation Division
Oregon Department of State Lands
cc: Devin L. Simmons, Oregon Dept. of Fish and Wildlife
Kathryn Harris, Corps of Engineers, Portland District
City of Tigard Planning Dept.
J�WttachmentAwestLAS\NSP No State Permd Reqwred LAS133986-nsp.doc
�#�
. . --°--.:.�.e�EE
' �v, �.�•..+�� vv.�v rm ov�oaoieov 1,11Y VP 11GA!(U ��Q1
�
� .' �.:��.. . : :.. . . : .:. �� � C�I�Y �.Of �T`ICA�Q : .
�: :.....�. :_: : ���: �:-� ���PRE.=APPIICAT�ON` CONfERE�NCE. HOT � . ���� ���:�ma��;���..�
. � . . . . . . . . ES .�,�.
. ..:.... .
. . � . .: � (P�-Ap ic�rion�fleetirtg Notes:a�e�Yalid for_Six � �Flortdis s��01krc�,,:
... _ _._ NON-RESIDENtIAL .
��� ... a ..
s�,�► .
MPUCANT: �n ��e AOENT; '
Phone: 2� . � Phone:
PROPERTY LOCATION: �
ADDAES'S/GENEItAI t0UTI01k /d c��S' 5tc� �'n� /�o - .fc���,«,
T�X MAP(�/I,OT #(S� �
_� �
� NECESSARY qpPUCATIONS;�t�s/7l�'G�n.� ,�,,�y�� ,.:�.�-
. .,,
PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: .�l�n+�h�'r�-7k,� ��i�yE�,�7"
`
�- aP •� � ,.
COMPREHENSNE PLAN
MAP DESIGNATION: I'h (1G mrx�✓ us�,��,,.,,�,►���
ZONINO IYIAP QESlGNATION: 1'j?11G
CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAM(C.I.T.)AREA: �,� c T
���n�r��uc�� uKu a e�re s���e. ��s �
MINIMUM LOT SIZE: sq. ft. qye�ge Min. bt width: ft. Max. building height:____,_ft.
S�trse� Front R Side ft. Rear ft. Comer ft. frvm stneet.
MA)CIMUM 31TE COVERAGE: 96 Minimum landacaped o�natural ve�etation area:____�_,,,_�o.
CJ �a��ru� oia�raawret�r����
THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY pyyryERS WITHIN 50p FEET, THE MEMBERS
OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S), �ID THE CiTY OF TI �eRD PI ehlnf�u� n��n�i�►� Qf
tfie�r proposal. A mirtimum of two (2) weeks between the mading date and the meeting date is
^�4��+�d• P�ease review the Land Use Notiflcation handout conceming sifie posting �nd the meeting
noNoe• Meetina is to be held orior te Rubmittina vour:a�lic�tion 0� the aDDlic�tfan uv��
� ! not be
" �� In order to also prellminaMy addre�s building code atandards, a meednp wlth a Pans
Examiner is encour�qerl privr to submktal ot a;lond usa application.
CITY OF TtGARD P►�4pplicabwi Canference I�ole�
N0N'A°"0i'�����w�s.a�a+ Pege 1 of d
. �
�.; _�.��:�
i . �,.. �.-� ��'�. '•..� ..........��..v., v.a• va a�v�uw
� �J VVL
N
, . ` � �Th�e A�RPLItiC N�S�L��
` - A � 3UBMIT A NARRATIVE whicM provides findmgs based on the applicable
� approval standards. Fallure to provid� a narrative or�eq uately address c�iteria would be reason tp
cons�der an applk�tion incomplete and delay review of tf�e proposal. The applicant should revlew
the code for appiicable c�teria.
❑ �stt�r a�er a aw s���.�oo,�te.aso.�o�
As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIR�MENTS, applicants are required to I C UD
IMP C ST Y with their submi�al package. The ir�pact study shall quantify the effect o�i�
eve pment on publk faalities and services, The study shalt address, at a minimum, the
transportation system, lncluding blkeways, the dreinage system, the parks system, the vy�ter system,
the sewer system and the noise impacts of the deve�opment For each pubhc faCiiity gystem and type
of�mPact, the study shall p�p�e �p�a��� n�ssary to meet City st�ndards, and to minimlze
the imp ct of the development on the public at la�+g e, publ�c facilities syr�tems, and affeded privabe
prvpertjr�users. In situatbns where the Community Devel�prneM Code nequires the dedicadon of re
property interests, the applicant shall either spectRcally concur with the dedicapon r uir�ment, or
p��w�d' e evidence which supports the condusipn that the real p�per�y d�iptbn requ�irement �S not
9hly proportlonal to the projected impacts of the development.
❑ �ee�s r�a.ra�t�.�s��a.��
Minimum number of acr�sses: Minimum acxess�,yidth:
Minimum pavement width:
All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parlcing areas, must be paved.
Driv�e-in use queuing areas:
❑ 1wu�rAr�� �pra�e.rese�r�■t�.r�.��l
WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM TNE GROUND FLQOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE
GR�UND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators ot alI commerciaf, institutional, and
tndustrial uses, to the strEets y�,hich provide the required access and egress_ Walkways shall provide
oomenient connections between buildings in multl-building comrne�cial, institutional, and industrial
complexes. Unless impra�ctical, w�lkways should be constructed between a new devebpment and
nefghboring developme�ts,
❑ �lEEIAL iE1� UN�flI hre l��er 1�.7301
➢ STREETS: fe�t from the centertine of
� LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet, aMng the site's bounda
➢ FLAG LOT: 1Q-FQOT SIDE YARD SETBAC�( ry�
❑ �l��� IMIwM CNe Seed�■'q�1i�,fN,�J .
I �, -1C3HT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings Iocated iE� a non-residential zone may be built to a
ne�ght o 75 f�eet provided atfi t:
➢ A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR)of 1.5 to 1 will exist;
➢ All acival building setbadcs will be at least half('/)of the building's height; and
D The structure wilf not ebut a ►�siden�ial zoned disfict.
❑ �0�=q� [�hrq 0�I�ertt,�1� �
In aMer TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TQ EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADV�RSE NQI3E
OR VISUAL IMPACTS beMreen ad�acern developmente, espep��ly between different land uses, the
CitY requires landscaped buRer areas along oertain site perimeters, Repuir�d buffer ar�eas are
descr�ed by tha Code in berrr�s of width, guff�areas m�st be occupfed by a mbcture of deciduous
�nd evQrgneen q�ees and shrubs and must also achieve�a balance between vertical and horizontal
plandngs_ 3ite obscuring acreens or�ences may also be requfreci; these ere often advisable even if
not rcquircd by t�e Code. The required buff�r areas may 1 be occupied by vegetatlon, fences,
ublities, and walkways. Additional informadon on required bu r area materials �nd siz�s may be
found in fhe Devebpment Code.
CITY OF TIGARD PraAppC�alion Conlerence Motes :
Na+•rs,�r�r++va�.�or�,�rq o►�o�e.oea, Py�gt 2 of 8
, �vr �v•���� v�.vv �� �v�vavaovv Valt V� 11VA1W �U�,
,- _ - The ESTIMATEp REQUIR�D BUFFER WIDTH3 annlicable to vour nrano�g! are� �
. feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary.
�feei along south boundary. '�eet along west bound�ry.
IN ADDITION, 91GH7 qBSCURING SCFtEENtNG I ERS QUIRED ALONG:
❑ IAI��AlM6 Ue�a�ble pul�e�tt,�i,'�.11ig�11�y151
STREET 1'R�ES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELC�PMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR
PRIVATE STREET a� w�ell as drivewaye which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must
be p�aced either wlthin the public right-of-way or on private prape�ty within six (6� feet of the right•of-
way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum cal�per of�t 1east two (2) inches when measured
tOUr (4? feet above grade. Street trees shouid be spaced 21D to d0 fset apart depending on the
branch�ng wndth of the proposed tree spec.ies at maturity. Further infarmaticn on regulations
affeding street trees may be obtained from the Planning Divrsron_
A MINIMUM QF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7} PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLAN7�D
in and around all parkin� areas in oRfer to provide a vegetative canopy effect. landscaped
areas shall include special design features which effectivP+�y screen the parking lot areas from v�iewng
These design features may include the u�e of l�ndsca�ped berms, de�raUve wa�ls, and r�is�d
planters.
❑ A�lM6 Oe1er r C�N�1RTi5l
licant �hauld CqNTACT FRANCHISE HAULER F+�R REVIEW AND APPRQVAL OF SITE
� S VtCING COMPATIBILITY. Loeating a trash/necycling enclosure within � cl�ar vision area such
6as at the irrterse�tion vf two (2) driveways within a parki�g lot is prohibited. Much of TigaM is within
2�5-�6 Disposars Service area. Lenny Hing is the oontact person and can be r+�ached at (503)
❑ !� �MI�r a oaM��u6s,6+W�
REQUIFtED parking fp�this type of use:
Parking SHOWN on p�,eliminary plan(s):
ark�g SHOYVN on p el�'�i ary plan sj9:
NO MORE THAN 5096 OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY � DESIGNATED AND/QR DIMENSIONED
AS COMPACT SPACES.
PARKINO STALL3 shall be dimensioned as follows:
➢ Standard pa�icing space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 fieet, 6 inches.
A Compac�parking SPace dimensions: 7 feet� 6 inches x 1B feet, 6 inches.
Noee: Parking sp�ce width in�ludvs the widlh oF a sWp�t1�at
separates the psrkl^A gP�from an adjolM^g apacs.
�: A maximum of thrae(3)feet pf the vshicle,over�ng arca In Mpnt o/a y�r��p or curb aan
b� �cludM a° part of requi^�f P��cJ'� depth. Th� area esnnot be included as
b�ndscaPin9 fbr membing the mir�imum W�9Q�4�+iromaMs.
�OICAPPED PARKING•
� 7{1� pa n a�eets s all PRpN�DE APPROPRtATELY LQCATEb AND DIMENSIQNED '
DISA�LE�PERSON PARKING spaces, The minimum nurnber of disabled person parking
spacea to be provfded aa weH as theparicin$ stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans
with DtsabiNties Act(A�3A). A handouf is availabb upon request. A handicapped parlcing �paee
symbol shall be painted on the parking spaoe suriac�and an appropr'rate sign shall b�posted.
➢ BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIREO FQR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPM�NTS. Bicyde ►acks shall be located In areas protected from automobile t�affic and
in convenient locations.
CJ L/����NTi Iahf n L'Mr i�CYN 1L]�i,i.Na
Every COMM RCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUII.DING IN EX.CESS �F 10,000 SQUARE FEET$ha��be
p�iv�de�d with a loading space.. The space s;z�e and Ibcation shall be as approved by the Clty
E
CITY OF TI(3ARD Pre�ApplicallOn COnf�npe fVp1Ed
n0a�ee�d.nw rµpr�on�,rr;ro ofi,s;o„s�aa, Pege 3 ot 8
J�. '• _--' _-.�. ..... ��w���.ovv ��aa vr atvaw �JUUq
;' �l 1�CtE� [�era._w�a�N�.7i51
% g� C S a�e nequired FQR MULTI-FAMiLY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIq�
. DE NTS. Bicycle radcs shall be locat�d in an�as protected from �utomobile Vaffic and in
oonv�nient Iocations.
(� �fi11ElAN�S [�e�qr�CNi i����Otii.T!$! '�-�
1'he Code provfdes REGUTATIQNS FOR LANpS WHICW ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUiTABLE FOR
DEVE�QPMENT DUE T!J AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NqTU
bRAINqp�AYS, WETLAND AREA3, ON SIQPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, pR ON
UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will atbempt to prelimina�� identify sensitive lands areas at the pre_
applicaGon conference based on avallable fnformation. � HOWEVER,
id t' ensi ive a s n a ' is :th n i il' af e nt. Are
m in e n
eve men i m ans su m t
Chapter 18.775 also provldes ulations for the use, ratection, or modific,�ation of sensitive fands
ar�s_ RESIOENTIAL DEVELQp�ENT I� PROH181TI THIN FLOODPLAIN�
� IN�►eng�EE`P�S OPE�S ex�ist�, prio�r to���y.uanoe of a fa
submitted which addresses the nal order � geotechnical report must be
&ec.tion 18.T75.080.C. The repo�hall be based upon 7eld e�plorativn nd invest'��gatbn and s alel
include specific recomme�tdatbns fior achl�vin g the r e q u i�e m e n t s o f S e c t i o n 1 8.7�S.O S O.C.
� �'��[�J i�S1� [�ra 11 a 1l�W��e�NS.Op�qr 3l
LAND DEVELdPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AR�AS shall preserve and maintafn or create a
ve9etated Qorridor for a buffer wide enough to prvtect the wate� qualihr functivning of the sensitive
area.
si n CriterM:
� A D CORRIDOR WIDTH la dependent on the senaitive area. The fotlowing table
identifies the r+�quired widths:
TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTNS
SOURCE; CW$DESIQN AND CONSTRUC710N STANDAROS MANUAURESOLUTION b ORDER 86.44
. . . . �S�iV$fT11f�AREA DEFINRION, :• .:.: . . : . �8LOPE ADJ/fCEIYT 1MDTN,OF VEGE't'ATED. :� �.�
.. � _ � . . . . TO$�IVSITNE AREA4: CORRIbOR PER 81DL�:
• Streams with int�ermit0ent flvw draining: <25;G
p 1 10 t0 <50 aCrp,s 15 feet
, 1 �50 to <100 aCr�es 25 feet
• � or cr�eted wettands cO.S acre
• E�dstlng or creat,ed wetlands �0.5 ac.�e Z5 feet
• Rivers. streams, and 6prings with yea�-round flvw t25'�6 50 feet
• Streams with lntennittent ftow draining >1 p0 aCres
• Natural lakes and nds
• Streams with intermitbent flow draining:
1 10 to <60 ac��e.s >�6:5 30 feet
1 �50 to <14Q ac►es 60 feet
• Ex�in9 or c.�ea�ed w�Uands >2�; Vuiable from 60-20�feet Me�sure
• Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow
� ��W�th��term►ttent flvw drafning a 100 acrea in 25-bot(ncrements from the staRin9
� Natura!lakes end ponds polnt to the top of ravine(break in
<Z59�alo�e), add 3�feet past the top
of rsvin�
Starting polrH fa me9suron�nt 3 edge of the delined Chan�»I (bankful tlowy for ahesmshivera, delin�al�d w�tland boundery, dslineued spnnp
h�t�within tha�riw►/s�n�a wettwWer tor lekee or pond�.whtchevar oMors g►eota�t hsourae protedion. Int�nniltsnt�srinpu. bo�t�tl�minirtwm of 18
vepetatad corHda,shaA nOt SlNO Of�SttrtirW Point ror rtwasur�nNnt.
��9eti0ed cOrriOo�everayiny or►eduction ia elbwe0 only whAn tho v6gotit�d oorridor ir oertdled to b�In a mdrpinal Or degfadetl oOnCRion.
�r�e�bed oorridor e�dends 35 feet hom the top d UN nvlM sntl tlls tfle ouber bound�ry of the veg�tsted corrldor. Tha 35 foet mey ba reduoed bo
1d�eeR N r�cwnPed�sotechn�eal nepoR oonArma sbpe steWMly shall be msintalned with thr►sduced ovtbadc from Ih�
top of ravine,
CITY OF TIGAR� Pre-AppNcatlon Contcr�ence Note�
NO►�iqsyr,�r�vw�sporaw,��r,o oiw�peeron Pspe 4 of 9
: VJ/LV��VVV �a.v� s� a�JabO1bOV (:1'1'Y Ut' i'IGARD . �005
l,
. . ' ��,gi�s in the Ve�. at�Cs�rridor:
nrv suuctures;`�eVe'}�'�p�nt, construction activitie9, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals,
' dumpinq of any materials of any klnd, or other activitie�shall be
fr��m the water quaiity pnottection provided by the veget�ted corridor�ex�cept as prov�dgfo aln�e
CWS Design and Constructl�on Standards.
i n ta ed Corridor�
' IIV ANY RES �iA�'�/�,ppMENT WHICH CREATE3 MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots �ntende
fOr' �Pa�� °wnersh�p, such as a subdivf�ion, the vegetated corrldor shall be cont�ined 1n a
separat�traa, and shali not be a part of any par�cel to be�used for the constructlon of a dwelling unit.
CW ry
�,—.-�.Pnovider Letter which will outline �the condit�vns��necessa{ryh to pcomply with the�R80 98 W9 Service
arear�eq uirements. If there are no sensltive areas, CWS rnust s611 issue a letter sta g9anCtWS
Service Provider Letter is not required.
� �SIaGN P�ERMlTaS�MUS�T rBE�pg AINED PRIOR TQ IN:TALLATION F
i'"�gard. A "Cuidelines for Sign Permits" handout �s availdble u n Q A� SIGN in the City of
height beyond Code standards may be peRrtitted ff the sk��°� �"est. Additional sign area or
devebpment review app�i�tion. Alfema��y, � Sign Code Ex�pt�'w�n appli�tion emay bep fi�d for
Directo�'s review.
❑ ��M�AN�� nMN'd CM!Se�fi�p H.1�1.03A.i.1
A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLqNT�NG, REMOVAL AND PR4TECTION QF TREES prepared by a
�ertified arborist shali be previded for any lot, Pan�l or combination of b� w parcels for which a
o�nd�t onal u e'fs�.p aro$tectr�,-o�ip��tl°�r,,emov�w�here pos�' p�R� development,
THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following:
➢ Identificatlon of the lacation, size and species of a11 existing trees including bees designated
as significant by the Cit�r;
➢ �M�p" °f � Pf09� � Se�e exisdn9 trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in
ql'�per. Mi��ation mttst follow�e r,eplacernent guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D according
to the followrng standa�ds and shall be exciusive of trees required by other development code
provisions far Iandscaping,str+eets end patking lot�:
� RBtainaQe of less than 25%of existi trees ov�er 12 inches in cal(per nequires a mebgation
pm9ram aocording to Section 1$.150�70.D. of no net loss of trees;
� Retaina�e of from 25 to 5pg6 of existin� trees over 12 inches �n caliper uires that two�-
thirds of the troes to be removed be miUgaUed acacorcling to Se��on 18.780�O.D.;
1 Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trQes �ver 12 inches in caliper requlnes that SO°r6
of the trees to be removed be mitigatedaccording to Sectbn 18.�g0.06o.D.;
� Retainage of 7596 or greater of exis�ng trees over 12 inches in callper requir+�s no
mitigatian;
D Identif`ication of all trees which are proposed to be r�moved; and
➢ A pnotection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the appl(cant to
A��es durin� and after canstruction.
TREES REM�VED WITHlN THE PERIOD OF pNE C1) YEAR PRIOR Tp A DEVELOPMENT
APPLICATION LI3TED ABpVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be
replaced accvrdin�to Section 18,790.pgp,p,
❑ �nw a�aa�aa��tut�.��
REPLACEMENT OF A TREE sh�ll take place aoao��ing to the following guid��inea:
� A replacement tree shall be a subst�nti�lly similar�pecies considering site ch�racteristics.
D If a replao�m��t t�e of the Sp�;eS pf �g a� �� or dam
available, th� Dfrector ma elbw aged is not reasonably
resourr,e vs�lue. � �P�acement with e difrenent species of equiva4ent natural
CITY OF 71GARD Pre�Appliaabon Can�erenoe Noee�
Nor��r ka�•�n�+q o�r�on�edan Pej�e 6 of 8
. ' """�"' ..��� ..• �-........ •prvvv
•
��. � � If a replaceme,__ ,ree ot the si�e r,ut is not reasonaby available on the (ocal market or would
,. � n�t be v�able, the Qirector shall require replacement with mo� than one tree in accordance
_,
with the following fqrmula:
� i The number of replacement trees �quired shell be determined by dividing the estimated
cali�er size of the tree removed or damaged, �y the calip�r slze af the largeat reasonably
availabl� replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the
subject property, the Director may r�quire one�(1)or more replacement trees to be planted
on ether prvperty yvfthin me city, either public property w, yvnh the cpnsent of ths owner,
private property.
m The planting of a replacement tree shall tak� pkace in a manner reasonably calculated to
allow growth to maturity.
IN LIEU OF TREE REPL�ACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a parry ►nay, with the
consent of the Olr�ctor, elect to compensate the Ciry for its costs in perfarmma such tree
replacement.
❑ ��SMII AwF� oder��e R��r1e.115l
The City requir�es that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE �3) AND
EIGHT(8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railr.�ad, and roadlroad intersections. he size
of the requirrad clear vision area depends upon th� abutting st�et's funct�onal classification and any
ex�stin9 ebstrucHcros within the cl�ar vision area.
D �noMUt�r����s c�aae.r.se���t�.e���
MINIMUM L,OT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless bt is created through the minor land partibon process.
Lots created as part of a partition must have a minlmum of 15 feet of frorrtage or have a minimum
15-foot wide access �asement.
The DEP7H OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 2'r4 TIMES THE AVERqGE WIDTH, unless the
Panve� is less than 1'r�times the minimum lot slze of ihe applicable zoning district.
���
._ 18.330(Cona�one�ux) 18.620(rr�d rr�oes;�,sd„dr�� 18.765 on-ere�
, 18.340�o:acmre�r�rpr�„b„� ✓ 18.630 � �0f�w�""'1b�
� 18.350 A"'°�1k1Qer�181""�j'a+''�°"� �''16.775�sensAl�e W nas Rev�w�
��"�^q 18.T05 Waoess�Cb�on� _.._ 18.�80(sqr��
_ 18.360 csx�o�,a��Re�ew� 98.710�n R„+oa�unMs� — 18.785 Remoo,�,u�a�,,;��
� i8.370(va�ar�ASyu�brenb} 18.715(oerwy Coma,me�aa) _ 18.790�r�se Remo,�a�
_.._ 18.380 aa,-ne►�rtdaAnbnam�ts
� 18.385(trreoel�neoua Penru� � 18,7251�F1wron' me�Param�..seandaro� _ 18.779�8��c�asa�)
�e 18,390(oeciaio„►�nu Rooeeuss�rmp�t � M�ss commu,ic�on Fea�ee,�
�ri 18.730I�To oe�reioan+�xs�� _. 18,810�sa�a ua�h a�o��,x s�aa�ds>
_____ 16.410(�.ot uno,ld�,�,�,al 18.740�uponc pve�oy�
� 18,420�tsna�,twa„� 18.742{�ome ooa„�,,,Pe„►,�,;
� 18.430�� 18.795��,�„�,g:�,1
� f 8.b10(Re�aen�zan�r�o�) 18.750(�,a�,red�►�oai Hwne�v�a�a,�a �
_�/''18,520(corrme�ae�taiin�t�) 18.785(�dad sora was�eoya�sbrsaa�
— 18.530�i�au�ai zo�rp o�� 18.760 Mo�oom�,rq s�o„�l.
CI���P�Appl�i�ee�tl�n Co�r�pp NOfes
Pape B af 8
•-• �° �--- �•.�• ..... ��v�o�avv� �aaa �r aavnw �JUV!
r
w� - .
•. � ����,��,�
r
. � � .
U
��i
i r
Q � ♦
� • J�Y
��'� s a 0 R�l ?a,�ec,�
u��w ,�.-v
_�� ` ' � ' �� � •< s-i ✓�
_ ' > sv �1��_
/
��s s �. .
l��CEI�E
✓ Administrative Staff Review.
______ Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Qffioe�.
Public hearing before the Planning CommiBgion.
______ Publ(c hearing before the Planning Comrnission with the C�mmission making a �
reoommendation on the proposal to the City Counc�J. An addRfonal public hearing shall be
held by the Cihr Council_
A�tllIAM11�N i�li'�I,��
AH APPLICATIONS MUS7 9E ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the
Communi Development pepe�rtmeM aeTi9ard City Hall ofioes. LE N � ��
n n�er � n �on a
4:
� $ n a be fol NCE
nw � �
s
The PMnninp Divisbn and Engineering Department will perform a pre liminary review of the
a irati�on and will determine w�ether en applicatbn i� complebe w;thtn 30 days of the courrter
n
�u mittal. StafF wi11 notlfy the applfc�nt if additional informsti�on or additional copfsa of the submitbed
ma�er�als ar�e required.
CCTY pF T!(3ARp Pre�Applicaticn Canfer�enog Npep�
�R°`�"aa�°n°"+v+«r�"o ow�on eec�a� Pop�7 of 8
, .-� �'. _- • - -_. -• '•� '-'�'�'��r v... v. ..v�u..r 4,Jcvvo I
f
P _ v ' .
� ' - The administrative dec��ion ar public hearing will ty�ically occur approximately 45 to 80 days,after an
.: - appNcation ia acxepted as being comp�e�e by the P annirtg Divis(on. Applicabons involving d�fficult or
protraded issues or r�quiring review by ather )urisdic�io�s may take additinnal time to review.
Written r�ecnmmenda�ons fram the Planning staff are�issued seven 7 da
hearin . A 10-da ublic a eal ( ) Y$ Prior to the publfC
Y p pP rio� followa all lancl use d�cislons. An appeal on thfs matter
would heard by the Tigard i�s ��+r. . A bas�c�ow chart
wf�ich illustrafes the review process s avaf a e rom e tann ng iwsion upon request.
Land use applic.�tions utring ap blic hearing must have notice posbed c�.s;te by q�e
applicant no(ess than 1��ays prior tp the public hea�ng,
This PRE,APPLICATIQN CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE
INTENDED TO INFORM the prospectnre applicant of the primary Community Development Code
r�equirements applicable to the patential development of a particular site and �o allow the CI S�
s� prospective appltoant to discuss the opportunities �nd constraints affecting development of the
. ��
PLANS FQR BUILOING AND QTNER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FQR
REVIEW UNTIL A LAND U5E APPROVAL HA3 BEEN�I8SUED. Final Inspection approvals by
the Building Division will not be granCed ur�t;1 there i$ complfance with all condltlons of
development approval. These pre�pplication nob�s do not include comments from the
Building Divlsion. For proposed bujldings or madiflcadons to exisqng bulldirgs, it is
ree�nm�nded to oontact a Buifding Divisian Plana Examiner to det�eermine if tF�ere are
bullding code lssues that would pr,event tl�e structu�e from being constructed, as proposed.
Additionally. with regard to Subdivislons and Minor L+�nd Partf�ons where any struc�ure to be
demolished has system development charge (SDC) c�nedits and the underlying parCel for that
structure will be elimmated when the new plat.is recorded, the i I those svstem
d v I �rst b ' i rt ecf ir� e dev lo m (��NL����
OBTAINED . MOLITION PERMIT IS
)
e con �n ce an n es cann c;over a e requ remen n asp
�1 plann+n th�t ould I � develo t of your site plan. F �lur� � $taff t rovi e
fn oKnation u b the�e sh�not c�►s ' te a w�nrer 'the ppli b�e s�andards or requir ents.
�sk an�� ��a , app�cant erther obtam an�read�t►e,G�ommun Development�or
esfians of C s�bo�ode r u�rements ria to subm�in an I�ca�on.
AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN
APPLICATION PERTAINING= TO THIS PRE-�I1PPl,ICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A
PERIOD OF MpRE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOU.OWIN�3 THI3 CONFERENCE (unless deemed as
�nr�ee�sary by the Planning Diviaion).
� �.
PI�PAREO 6Y: � � �
Qfl OF I N - �TAFF PEItS�N HOLDING P!!E-APP. MEETIMG
PHONE: (S03) 639�111 FA�L• (503) 684-1291
E-MAIL ����,dgud.or.us
��(pry OF 1IGMD'S COMMUNIIY DErEIOPIIEMI'CODE)��T��ES&N�NI,�,K.p�
H:lpettyyntE0�31R'A�App N061t COmrt►ercial,doc lJpd�bod: 3�OCt-02
(Eng�neerir�y sactbn:preapp.eng) �
GTY OF TIGARD Pre-Applica�lf�on Cankrenoe NaOea Page 8 of 8
�Aeewe�+r�aa�:.ror�w.�g a��s��,
. ...... � �
� . �
• , . ; : � � . . �I
- .� .� . �p�-����oN��co���c��ror�� � �
� � � � � �? E�I��NEERIN��E�'tQl� Q ����:
� . . ���
�oeu�r�crun�s ���� �
ra� . 1a
Ils�rya�: o�nerN�l
The extent af necessary public improvements and dediCaticans which shall be required of the applicant
will be retx�mmended by City staff and subject to approval�by the appropriate author�ty. There will be
no fi►�a�recommendation to the decision making authority an behalf of the C�ty stafF until all concemed
��enbn9 a8enaes, CiiY staff and tfie public h�ve had �n oppertunity to review and comment on
the appliCation, 'The folfowing cpmments are a ara 'on c�f public improvement r�lated
that may be rgquired a�a condition of develo �quirements
. pmerrt apprby�l for your proposed project.
�ht-of-wav dedication• '
Yhe City of Tlgard requires that land area be dediqted to the public:
(1.) To incxease abutting public rights-of.�yvay to the uf�mAte funchanal street dassfication
right-of-way width as specif�eci by the Community DEwelopment Code; or
(2•) Fo�tha cr�eation of n�w gtreets.
Approval of a development applicatfan for th�site will requiFe right-af-way dedication for:
❑ S�____--to feet
� �w to feet
❑ �_____to feet
❑ v�`to f�et
Str�eet improvemerr s�
❑ street imp�ovements wil) be neCessary along 5W�, to include: :
❑ _feet of pav�rr�ent
❑ concrete curb
. ❑ stam sewers and otfier underground utilities
❑ -foot concrete sidewalk
[� �tr�et trees
Q str+e�t slgna, traffic cor�qbl devices, sbeetlights and a two-year streetlight fee.
❑ Other.
4Mw��w MM1�Nt��I�NMW MNq hM 1�1• '
, �. .,
. ., .. ,,. .v�.,.,
v�viu
�
�
• , ❑ street impro..�nents will be necessary a�or�g tsW , to include:
-., ❑ feet of pavement�
C] c�oncrete curb
❑ storm sewers and other und�rground utilities '
❑ -foot concrete sidewaik
p str�eet trees
[] street signs, traffrc control devices, streetlights and a two-year streedight fee.
❑ Other:
❑ .._,_street improvements will be necessary along SW , to fnciude:
D _,feet of pavemerrt
� ❑ concrete curb
❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities
❑ -foot concr+�te sklewa�k
❑ strieet trees
❑ street signs, traffic corib�o!deviraes, streetlights and a twa-year streebight fee.
❑ Other.
❑ street improvemerns will be necessary along �W , to include:
❑ feet of pavement
❑ concr�ete curb
[� storm �ewers and othe�underground utilities !
[1 -foot concr�ete s�iewalk
❑ stneet trees
❑ street signs, traffic control devices, stre�dights and a two-year slreeUight fee.
❑ Qther:
❑ street improvements will be necessary along ;►Vy , to inctude:
❑ ._,,..�fe�t of pavement
❑ concrete curb �
❑ �tom►sew�ers and other underground utilities
❑ �fdot concrete sidewa{k �
❑ stt�eet trees
D �treet sjgns, traffic control devices, str�eUights and a twayear streeUlght tee. �
�
�
sr�..�n..n�w�e�11M01■�wia�NM� hw:Ni ,
. ..... .., a a vnnu l�l O 11
� _ ❑ Other. �
, '-----
�+ ,
Y-.
" nt for Fu Im r
In same cases, where street improvements or other nece�sa
pr�ctical, the improvoements may be deferred. In such cases,aucond'rmtiporroi�developmertt ap oval
m� � ��� ���h requires the ProP�r'tY��er(s) tQ provide a future improvement gwarantee.
Th� City Enginesr will de#eRnine the form of th�s guarantee. The toll�wing st►�et irnprovements m�
be eligible fvr such a future improvement guarantee: Y
���� �
(2) .
dli Lin s:
Section 1$.814.120 of th� Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utitity lines
adjacent to e devebpment to be pfaeed undergrownd or, at the election of the developer, a
fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This �equirem�nt fs valid even if the utili�y lines
are on the opposite side of the street from the s�te. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to
� 3 35.00 per lineal foot of street fror�tage that coritains the overhead lines.
There are existing overhead utility Ilnes which n,in adjacent to this site along $W r
Prior to______, the applicant shaU either pl�oe these uti��i�s �nderground, or pay the fee in-
lieu described above.
S�nitarv Sewers:
The nearest sanitary sewer line tv this property is a(n)__ inch 11ne which is located
proposed development must be connected to a public sanftary sewer_ It is the devebper"s
cesponsibility to,�
Water Supnhr
The (Phone:(603) __� p�vides public water se�yiee fn the area of this site. This service
provider should be cor�taded for information r�egardi�g w�p�supply for your propos�ci development.
Fire Protechon:
Tuala4n Valley Fir�e a►xi Rescue p�st� �South Division) [Contact: Eric MeMullen, �
pcvvides fire (503) 612-7010j
Rrotectlon services with;n the City of Tigar�l. The pisMct should be corrtacted for
i�'oRnation regarding the adequacy of circula�on syster�ns, the need for fire hydrants, or pther
questions related to fire protec�tion.
�� �+�r Imnrovemen�s:
Afl proppsed devebpment witf�tn the Cit�+ shall be designed such that storm water runoff is cpnve ed
to an approved public drainage system. The applicarrt will be required to submit a proposed st�m
�«�+�ni��QNIwMia NNa �
MN irf i j
�
!
, .-� -- - : - � -- --- ---------- ---- �- --......., .G•..�
' - drainage plan for the sm xi ma be
.. -that the p�aposed 8 y r�quired to pr+�p p a su � as�in drainage a�alysis to ensure
� ysten� .,accommodate runoff from u stream ro rties when ful developed.
a-�
�.
Stomt Water Qualitv:
The City has agreed to enforce Surtace Water Management (SWM) r�egulations estabiished by the
Unffied Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Qnder No. 00-7) which requires the construction Qf
� on,site water quality facilitiees. The facilities shall be design+ed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus
cantal�ed in 100 percerrt of tfie storm weter runoff generateed irom newly c.�ea�d impervious surtaces.
The resolution contair►s a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of canstructing
an on-site facility provided specific crit,eria are met. The City will use discr�tlon in detennining whether
or not the fee in-lieu will be offe�+ed. If the fee is a�lovyed�, it wiry pe bas� upon th� amount of new
��°� �u�ac�s �ated; for every 2,&l0 square feet, or portion.thereof, the fee shall be $210.
Prel�ninary sizing ca�ulatbns for any propc�sed water quality fac(lity shall be submitted with the
.development appllqtion. It is anticipated.that this project will require:
❑ Construation of an on-site water quality facility. .
❑ Payment of the fee in-lieu.
�r Comments�
All proposed s►anitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City
mairrtenanc�vehicles w(II have unobstruded acc�ss to c.riti�al manholes in the systema. Maintenance �
access rbadways may be required if exisbng or p�opq� �r����� are not othenNise readily
accesslble. ,
1) Stnrmwdterplans must bs reviewed and approv+ed by CWS(posslbly the Cor�,s/pSL 8 ODF8V1�
2) Cfty p/an mv�4ew wlll be b y Ghe Building Depaibnent.
nuu�c���a
In 1890, Washington County adopted a county-wide Trafflc Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The T�affic
Impect Fee program collects fees from new d�velopment based on the development's projected
impact upon�the City's tr�nsportation system. The applicant shall be requlred to pay a fee based upon
the number of trips whlch ar�e projected to result from the proposed development. The ealCUlation of �
the T'IF is based on tfie proposed use of the I�nd, the size c�i the�proje�t, end a general use based fee
��rY� I k:ulated f � bui(din ' In lirnited
��m�ances. paymeM of the TIF inay be allowed to be dbfen+ed until the iasuanoe of an xcupancy �
p�'►�t• Deferral of the paymerrt until accupancy is pemiissible on when the TIF fs greater than ;
$5,000.00. .
� i
ell►M11RNR�hFAA�etlwl�N�NIM� hN��li
�sM.alwMw�.ri.r..
• ---- -- --........ .a,,,.,.
� :
�µ� ��
-t� Public F�cilitv Imcrovement(PFI)� .
' Any work within a publlc right-of-way in the Cily of Tigard rec�uires a PFI
Departmecrt. A PFI Pe���m the EnQineering
pem�it application is available at the��Planning/Engineering coun�r in City hfall.
For more exten�ive work such as stteet widen(ng improvements, main utllity Itne ex0ensions or
subdivision ir�frastructure, plans pnepared�by a r�gis�e�d professional enginee�must be submltted for
r�view and approval.
The Engineering Department fee structure for this permit is con�idered a cost recc�very system. q
deposit is �otlected with ihe application, �nd the City wilR track lts costs throughout tite life af the
permit, and will e(ther refund any remainin9 portion of the:deposit, or in+roice the Permittea in cas�s
wher� City eosts exc�eeds the deposit amount. NOTE: Englneerirtg Staff time will also be tradced for
arty final design-r�lated assistanc�e p�pvi��to a Permittee or their engineer prior to submittal of a PFI
permit applk�tion. This time will be oonsidered part of the adminfstration of the eventual PFI permit.
The Permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other suc� �uitabls s�curity.
Where professiona�engineereti pyns ar,e naquir�d, the Permi�tee must execute a DevebpedEngineer
Aqreement, which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspectfon of the public
irnprovement construction�,yo,�C, rhe PFI perrnit fee struc:ture is as follows:
M� If�PFI PermRls reqr�,tl�e��tlna�to�tlat
�I��e�ef an��er�irom t�e��.
Buildinn Dfvision Permits•
l�h.e fvllcwing is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. Fvr a more
detalled �xplanation of these permits, plea�e opntact the Developmertt Services Counter at
503-639-4171, e�. 304,
Site Improvement Perrnit (S�T}, This pertnit is �enerally issueq for atl new cx�mmeraal,
industrial and multi-tamily projects, This permlt yyill aiso be requir�ed fpr(and partitions where (ot
grading and private ublity work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading
and utility wvrk. Home builders will also be requlreck tp �ain a SIT permit for grading wo�Fc in
�ases whene the lot they are working on has slopes in exoess of 20°� and foundation
excavatlon material is not to be hauled from the site.
Bullding Permit (BUP). This permk oovers only the construction cf the building and is issued
after, or concurrently with, the 31T permit, �
Ma�ster Permit(MS'n. This permit is issued for ell gingle and multi-family buildings. It covers alt
warlc �necessary for building constructinn, including sub-trades (exdudes gradir�g, etc.). This �
permit can not be issued in a subdi�rision until the public improvem�nts are substantiaAy
complete and a mylar c�py of the recorded plat has �een r�ttumed by the applicant te the City.
For a Nand patti'ti�on, the appNcant must obtain �n Errgineering Pe�rnit, ff required, and retum a
mylar oopy of the recobed P�at to the City prior bo issuance of this perrn�.
Other Permits. There ar�e other special permits, suGh as mechanical, elecbical and plumbing i
that may also be required. Contad the Davelopment�Servioes Caunter for more inform�fion. �
��n������� MM�6Mi
�.n1��.�.�rwc�
� _
. , _
�, .
.�-� .
a
�1�PIAN B�IREME111��IA SO�DIIIISI�MS �
All subdivision projecb shall r�qutre a proposed.gr�ding pl�n prepared by the design enginee�. T��
engineer will also be required to indicate wh(ch lots hav� �atural slopes between q09�o �nd 2096, as
w�eli as lots that have natural stopes in exvess of 209k. This inform�tion wilt be necessary in
deteirnining if special grading inspections will be required when the �ots deyelap. The design engineer
will also be required to shade all strt�ctural fill areas on �the construction plans. In addition, each
homebufider wUl be r�quired to aubmit a speciflc site and floor pl�n for eaeh lot. The s�te plan sh�ll
indude topographical contours and indicate the �levabans.of the comers of the IoL The builder shall
also indicate the proposed�levations at the four oomers af#he bulkiing.
�� � �Q�
�All�lil�BEP�RTIM�N� �p�
PI�: [5�63g.+11t1
f�ot [60�)iZ4-815y
�
rt�,��ea; s�����oo�
�M��we...r��a M�EIi
n�.�rs
Peter Finley Fry arcP Ph.D. (503) 274-2744
2153 SW Main Street, #105, Porlland, Oregon USA 97205 • Fux (503) 274-]-�15 • pfinleyfry@uol.com
May 4, 2006
RECEIVED PLANNING
Emily Eng MAY 0 $ 2006
City of Tigard
13125 SW Hall Boulevard CITY OF TIGARD
Tigard, Oregon 97223
RE: Case File No. SLR2006-10005
Please accept the following responses to your letter of April 19, 2006 and deem the application
complete.
1. Property tax statement enclosed document the ownership of these two properties.
2. A revised site plan that clearly shows the location of the proposed activities is enclosed.
3. A revised site plan that shows the percentage of landscaping is enclosed.
4. A revised narrative is enclosed.
5. In response to 18.390.040.B.2.e. Include an impact study.The impact study shall quantify the effect of the
development on public facilities and services.The study shall address,at a minimum,the transportation system,
including bikeways,the drainage system,the parks system, the water system,the sewer system,and the noise
impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact,the study shall propose
improvements necessary to meet City standards and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at
large, public facilities systems,and affected private property users. In situations where the Community
Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests,the applicant shall either specifically concur
with the dedication requirements, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property
dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development.
The proposed project is developed between two pieces of private property and along the
southern side of a piece of public project. The project does not impact or affect the
transportation system including bikeways, the parks system, the water system, the sewer
system. Nor does the project or the development have any noise impact. The project will
reroute the storm drainage system. The calculations provided show that the proposed new
system will be equal and better in regards to conveyance and treatment of water.
6. Calculations for water quality and sizing of ditch.
Sincerely,
�f�
Peter Finley �
Peter Finley Fry ArcP Ph.D. (503) 274-2744
2153 SW Muin Sireet, #105, Portlund, Orego�i USA 97205 • Fux (503) 274-1415 • pfinleyfry@aol.com
March 22, 2006
Revised May 4, 2006
SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW
LANPHERE ENTERPRISES
ADDRESS: 10685 and 10655 SW Greenberg
APPLICANT/OWNER: Bob Lanphere, Jr.
Lanphere Enterprises
12520 S.W. Canyon Road
Beaverton, Oregon 97005
APPLICANT REPRESENTATIVES:
Planninq Consultant: Peter Finley Fry AICP
2153 SW Main Street #105
Portland, Oregon 97205
(503) 274-2744
(503) 274-1415 FAX
Enqineer: Andrew Jansky
Flowing Solutions
3305 SW 87�' Avenue
Portland, Oregon 97225
(503) 297-6331
(503) 297-6053 FAX
STATE IDENTIFIGATION NiJI�ER: 1S BB #00700
ZONE: MUC Mixed Use Commercial
Washington Square Regional Center
SENSITIVF: LANDS REVIEW
Type II
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The storm water drainage way currently runs north - south between
two pieces of property (10685 and 10655) . We propose to reroute
the water drainage way to eastside of eastern property to an
existing drainage ditch. A culvert crossing at that ditch would be
replaced at the road and a new culvert would be extended east to
west along the southern edge of the eastern property' s line. The
drain pipe remaining in former drainage way will be covered with
gravel and the gravel will be compacted.
�Peter Finley Fry March 22, 2006
Lanphere Enterprise drainage way relocation Revised May 4, 2006
The storm water drainage way would be relocated from private
property to a public alignment for most of its way allowing public
access for maintenance. Two private lots under a single ownership
would be combined to allow functional efficiency.
RESPONSE TO CRITERIA
18 .390 (Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study
Type II (18.390.040)
Sensitive Lands Permits
-Within Drainage ways 18.775
Finding: The proposal impacts an existing drainage way that
requires a Type II process.
18 .530 (Commercial Zoning District)
H.MiJC:Mixed Use Commercial District.The MUC zoning district includes land around the Washington Squaze
Mall and land immediately west of Highway 217.Primary uses permitted include office buildings,retail,and
service uses.Also permitted are mixed-use developments and housing at densities of 50 unites per acre.Larger
buildings are encouraged in this area with parking under, behind or to the sides of buildings.
Finding: The light industrial/distribution uses preexist the
application of the MUC zone. The proposed relocation of the
drainage ditch allows the two properties to be used as a single
site that is consistent with the purpose of the Mixed Use
Commercial District .
18 . 630 (Washington Square Regional Center)
A. Purpose.
1. This Chapter will implement the vision, concepts and principles contained in the Washington
Square Regional Center Plan, and the recommendations contained in the Phase ll
Implementation Plan Summary Report, prepared by a Task Force appointed by the City of
Tigard.
2. Metro's Regional Urban Growth Management Functional Plan target growth capacity for the
Washington Square Regional Center will be met by permitting mixed use development within the
Regional Center at densities appropriate for an urban center.
3. A mixed use Regional Center will contain a variety of districts that vary in scale, predominant use,
and character. Distinct districts, connected to each other and to the rest of the region by a multi-
modal transportation system, will provide a range of working, living and shopping opportunities.
4. Improved multi-modal transportation links, higher densities, variety of land uses, and enhanced
environmental qualities will all contribute to create a desirable, livable community in the face of
dramatic population and employment growth.
2
Peter Finley Fry March 22, 2006
Lanphere Enterprise drainage way relocation Revised May 4, 2006
5. New mixed-use zoning districts, along with existing residential zoning districts in established
areas, are appropriate for the Regional Center.
Finding: The light industrial/distribution uses preexist the
application of the MUC zone. The proposed relocation of the
drainage ditch allows the two properties to be used as a single
site that is consistent with the purpose of the Mixed Use
Commercial District . No development is proposed that would require
compliance to the development standards .
18 .775 (Sensitive Land Review)
18.775.070 Sensitive Land Permits
D. Within drainage ways. The appropriate approval authority shall approve,approve with conditions or deny
an application request for a sensitive lands permit within drainage ways based upon findings that all of the
following criteria have been satisfied:
1. The extent and nature of the proposed land form alteration or development will not create site disturbances
to an extent greater than that required for the use;
Finding: The proposed work is the minimum necessary to relocate the
drainage way from a location between two pieces of private property
to run along the right-of-way for the majority of the relocated
distance.
2. The proposed land form alteration or development will not result in erosion,stream sedimentation,ground
instability, or other adverse on-site and of�site effects or hazards to life or property;
Finding: The area proposed for work is flat . Erosion control will
be utilized throughout the development process.
3. The water flow capacity of the drainage way is not decreased;
Finding: The drainage way is proposed to be replaced by a public
facility of equal or greater capacity.
4. Where natural vegetation has been removed due to land form alteration or development,the areas not
covered by structures or impervious surfaces will be replanted to prevent erosion in accordance with Chapter
18.745, Landscaping and Screening;
Finding: The drainage way proposed to be filled will be
incorporated into the existing yards of both adjacent properties
with proper compaction and materials .
5. The drainage way will be replaced by a public facility of adequate size to accommodate maximum flow in
accordance with the adopted 1981 Master Drainage Plan;
3
�Peter Finley Fry March 22 , 2006
Lanphere Enterprise drainage way relocation Revised May 4, 2006
Findinq: The drainage way is proposed to be replaced by a public
facility of equal or greater capacity that is proposed to run along
side a public right-of-way for the majority of its relocated length
as opposed to running through the center of two pieces of private
property providing better public access .
6. The necessary U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board, Division of State Lands, and
CWS approvals shall be obtained;
Finding: The U. S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon Land
Board, Division of State Lands, and Clean Water Services have been
consulted. Their responses and approvals when necessary are
attached.
7. Where land form alterations and/or development are allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain,
the City shall require the consideration of dedication of sufficient open land area within and adjacent to the
floodplain in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. This area shall include portions of a suitable elevation
for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted
pedestrian bicycle pathway plan.
Finding: Alteration or development is not proposed within or
adjacent to the 100-year floodplain.
4
MAY. 4.2006 12�46PM LANPHERE ENTERPRISES ' Nd.539 P.3i3
� . �. 7'�i/05 T4 bi_�/06 REAL PR�JP1E�tTY TA,. STATER�IENT .
WqSMINGTON C�UNTY OREGON � 155 N FIIRST AVE., RM 130 � HI�ISBORO,QAEGON 8T3 24
PROPER7Y pESCR1PT10N MAP: 1S135�B-0o7oo ACCOVNT O: Ri033704
S�TUS: '10685 SW GRELAIBI]RG ROAD, CODE ARBA: 023,8t
� �RES 2.19 ZQ03-Z 6 CURR TAX D1 CT:
• COI�lt7NITY COT,r,BGE-PORTL]1lTD 37Z.79
ESD-NN REGIONAI. 148.36
, ' .. . . . . SCAOOZ-TiGARD d,812.68
! . ' . �C800Z,-TIG�711Zb/TOAI,-ll�gR 10/0 9�4.62
� . . . , • . EDQCAT20N 7�'A7c$8: � $6.1�8.43
i LANFNERE PROPERTIES V LLG C��Y`��s��� 2
12505 SW 6ROADWAY . ' ,168.s5
' BEAYER70N, QR-97405 • • �Q�'�81N��N • 3 60.09
I ' R8t3TON]1I.-�TRO SE&VIC]! ..•� �3.18
VALl1ES: 1.AST�Y�AR ?H�S Y�AR �eoaT-aonrr.�xa � .
6�.6a
� MAR.KB'P VALIIE9: � � • l�RB-TV FSR� & 1tESCGE 1,472.2�
Ll►N� � . . 600,990 '686,'8�$0 �Ty-TiG14itD ' �,4�4.19
BTROC'I'iTRH • 671.7$Q 626,9�� _1►YRS-TV Fi�B & RE�C08-1►!'TRR i 2�l1.16
TOT1�►,L RbP VALQE . • 1.172,770 ... 1����,.�8C . Ost�79�►L. oon�a�a�r �,AZ�S s $g,826.33
T?�BL'� '�l�T{Q�3: � , , . .w; i. . ,. : � . , .. . .
ASS$SSBD V7�iL•�S� • . � 936�530� � ,� • '•964���6'i���.�r•��-W�SgRQQ�O�l�COIINTY • � . 210.09
, , . , , . , ' 30N'3)-D[ST&O 88rtVICE Dx9T 180.87
. , . ,HOND-PCC . 204.69
PROPERTYTIIXES: $15,399.93 '$15.;76�.52 ��'� #23-xzGl►]tD 969.83
BOND- 2'V lIRB E R8SC4ffi 94.76
APPF.AL D�,pI.IIVE January 3rd,2006 1�Or�-Cl2Y OP TIG7►RD 195.I4
Value Qpl�ons • • C�1�SQ3-8465826 SCNA-TAI-I�T 11!.B9
r'ix Q� , �, GII 50�-846�$$Ol � BC800L-TIG?►8D/TQAL-J►lTRR 10/� 8�1.47
+�Qa� Cs1150�$�6*a741 ' 80I�ID ?AX: ¢2,791.7s
�1t0�'ERTY TA%PAYHffiNT QPTYONS 2005-06 TA]C ;H@Fore Aiacount) $1S,766.52
(See dick of Statem�c f�p�yment instruc#Ions.)
Pay D�u� �[scouac Net Amo�t Due
Io '�11/15/05 �93.d0 $15,�93.52
2�3 il/1S/pS Z10.�Z . $1C,3oo.80 .
�/3 11/15/OS NO�fB $5,2SS,51
PY�.AS�MAI�?PA'Y�NT To:w on coun Tux uEI.�NQuENr TA7CES: xo �s�uaq�vaivT z�s aog
Msk!On2ine Psymmts at � ' tSee back fo�axp�enation of iexes msrk�d with�n aeterisk f'),
�a;//��������,�,�rpp�.�x betinqueM Tnx Total is tncluded in paymsnt opcions to the leit�
Pay by tf►one i�(3�)SIO-9274 TOTAL (/lfter ptstopnt): �15,293.52
7� Teor Hw P�.r+J1SS R$rURN 1��.9 lU3t'x'ION WITH PAYJI�NT - �B SACIC Ol►STATBI�IVT FUA IlV$lRUCTION$ 7�Tenr Hae
zoos.�oo6 ��,r�r,y��,�,c staa WASHtNGTp1d C4[1N'IY, OREG�N ACC T N : Rt
SITUS: 10685 SyV GI�EN8l1RG ROAD, � Mw'OL ad���nE�e or asme oJ�an�e ao b+�of ceub.
Unpaid DBLNQvSN4"TAX AUS 1S INCl.Up14D)N PAYMl41VT OP1'ION�
flli!PAYM�AI'C(Ir,clud�s 376 piswant) Dll�s l l-1�-05 ............................................. �15,293.52
2/3 PAYI�EN? (tndudes 2'16 D[srnunt) DU�: t 1-15-05 .........�............�.....�........�...._.. $10,300.80
1/3 �AYMENT(No Discoonc Ofrerad) DUEs 11-]5-05 .................................,........... SS,255.51
DISCOUNT IS LOST Jo 1N7�1QEST ATPL,ES AF7"ER Di/B DA7$.
P1noe M�ks Payseoc ta FNTER AM01lNT PA[D
L/1NPHERE PROPERTIES V LLC W��NG70N COUN'iY
)2505 $W BROADWAY �y r"�P'�1D��
P•0.Hoa 356�
BEAVERTON, OR 97005 potdaa0,OR 97Z08-358�
3400�110337040041529�520001o3onRnnn�ns�ss���
MAY. 4.2006, 12�45PM LANPHERE ENTERPRISES N0.539 P.2i3 �-`
ii t ius �O t •O/O6 REAL PROPERTY 1'AY i"rATEMENT
WASHiNGTON C( V OREGON • 15g N FIRST AvE„RM 130' hII�L; 0,OREGON 97�24
PR PERTY DESCR,IPTT01�1 MAP: IS13566-00800 ACCQUNT N�: R1033697
sr�russ 10655 SW GREENBIIRG RD; CObE AR�A: 023.81
P''RFS 2.�3 �/�r� f �0.�'i"t�,y'�J� - 006 CIIRR� DIST �
���� � °
-�—� �-� CO�DdIIDiZTY COLLEQB-POR�
'� ��'c • / �� � � /!�� 7� B�SD-�iK RBGIONAL 218.05
(� 1ZS.S9
r- �� / : O Q4 � �� ��/Q V( � SCSOOL-TI(i?!Ra 3.846.S7
• `f•/` SCSOOL-TIC.7IRD/TQAL-AP'T�R 10/0 771.04
%r+"� ���4 0 ° ��f. 'a a�LL, c/a EDOCA�xON T1�S:
, $,,954.55
LAAIPHERE PROP�RTIES V LLC T r
12505 SW BROADWAY Co�X-�1SEri�GTpN 1,733.6I.
BEAVERTON, pR 9700� COa�rrY�w►�H�roN �87�.83
VA�UES: I,AST YEAR TH1S YEAR �czox�w-r�co sa�rv�c8 �s.48
_ PallT-PQ1�TL7�IlRD 54.05
MARKBT V1�,.LIIES: . �',ut8-TV FIR$ & 88SCU8 1.�75.99
�� 557,090 f36,67Q �=Ty_xx��
ST��CTII� 560,970 660,300 • 1,937.70
TOTAL RMtT VALQE I,21$.Q6Q 1,296.97 Q F=�'� ��� � �s�-��' 1 192.76
' �SNSR.�►L GOVRRtII�NT T7U[a3= $5.456.42
i.3XA8LI; V;s;,,?ES z
A9S83SED 9ALUE 7$8.590 771,0�0 8�-�T�GTON CO�N'�Y 167.93
H0�-�'1'a0 SSAVICB D=ST 144.57
so�an-�GC 163.6i
PROPERTY'TA7C�Ss $1�,309.51 $12,602.49 ��'� ��3'TZ�� 775.20
B02tC1- 'TV BiRl�' ie ltHtaCUB 3 S.78
A�PEAL D$.ADLQIC JaAps[9 3id 2006 �'�_� OF TYC�1xa • 1S5.9s
V�ne Queatioas CaII S03-S46-88Z6 B�`�'�T ' � ' � 91.83
Taxc Questio� � Cal�503-54�8801 8cgooL-r=c,a►�nr�-ri�r� i0/O 656.6Z
O��'Q��� CaR 503-846-$7a1 �� T�= � 52.191.sa
PROP'ERTY?AX PAYMSNT OPTIONS a005-a6. ?AE (estore Dis�couat� $12,602.�9
f5ee bacl:of 5a►tenent for poyment ioetructioas.) '
Pap Dne Diso�at Net Ar.�unt Drs� • .
�i�11II lI/15/OS 378.07 �12,$Z4.�42 �
2/3 11/15/OS 168.03 $8,233.6� � '
1/3 11/15/OS �TpbT3 $4,200.83 • � �
P�AS�MAKE PAYII�TP TO:'Vqaahin Count Tax D�UNQUENT TAXES� �
Vtilce OdiIIB PIIpypCats it Da0 DBLINQQ8IQ'P TAXS3 DVE
(9aa back tor oxplanation ottexes msrked with an asterisk(•).
dttpS_/ICCO�I.tp,wudtngto�or.as/proporry�� � .. �in4�4�t Tpx Total is inc�Wded i�pa�mene optia�to the lon.l
Pay Dy PhoAe a�(888)510-4274 /� TOTAL (�►t�t�r Difg�rtt • $�2�Z2a}.�2 �
� t'al�/' �G?u f?�ir�t �P""+�'o t��f� �- -
� 'I'air t[cre lLEA�RETURN THIS PORTYON WrC$lAY�' � 9aB BACB OF 5TA'�Yffi�R'E'OR INS7RUC'1'YONS a Tcar Harc
2005-ZOOb propertr Tax pa�m��Sp�b yyqsHfNG7'ON COt1MY, ORl'.GON A CO(1 T NO: R103 97
SIT[IS: l 0655 SW GR�ENB[IRG RD� � Ma��d�'e�s chsq�e�r eame¢Ilau�e so baek eE stub.
l/npald DElINQUENT TAX DLlE IS INCLi/DBD IN PAYMENT OPTTONS.
FUl.L PAYMENT(lnclodes 3% D�connt? DUE: 11-15-05 ...,......................................... $12,2�4.42
2/� PAYMENT(IncJada Z96 D�SSO�e) DU4�c 1 1-15-05 ............................................. �8�233.63 j
1/3 PAYMENP(1�[o Discoaat OBerad) DL1E: 1 1-15-05 .....��..,.,....................,.......,..., �4,200.83
DISCOUNT IS LOS1"�'e IMSRB'ST AppLC$S AF'T'gR DU14 DA?T,
Pteasc Make Payme�t to: . �L•�� • � L
ENTEM[AM�UNY PAID
LANPHERE PROPERTIES V I.LC W�HINGT�N CoUN7Y
12505 SW BROADWAY PCOn`'m'Ta��ayme,u c�
BEqVEATON, OR 97005 P• 0• �x 3587
porn�.01t 97Z08-3387
340001103369700072ZZ4420000823363�0004200830
S5a•95a�1p8�(Rav A.o51
MAY. 4.2006 12�45PM LAPPF�RE ENTERPRISES N0.539 P.li3
Lsnphere EMerprises
12505 SW Broadway
. eeavertat,�R 97�05
503.643.5577
503.643.8687 FAX
rx P+eter Fry Fren�s Robb Waither
� 503-2741415 P�s: 3
P1aMe Dabc 5,►42006
R� Lsnphere Properties V,LLC ec:
O Nr��t ❑ For Rwirw ��CwnnMrd ❑Mqs�lapb► D Ptaso R�q�
Here is requested documentation fbr Lanphene Pr�erties V, LLC land proof of ownership; the 2005-
2006 prop�Ky ta�c sta0ome�ts.
� �—b(Q
LANPHERE ENTERPRISES
CULVERT REPLACEMENT ° �
�,,,��E„ 10685 SW GREENBURG ROAD w om
TIGARD OREGON = °w° �
, Z��
�'o[NM � � �3�
6wM�Rr � swMUlTr�oww J �,�o
y� � ��� � PLUMBING PERMIT SUBMITTAL � m�� �
SITE LOCATION e
■RO pCAKN b �
� ��� ��� �kEi
� ,�t�` �k�d�
� GENERA.L NOTES CONSTRUCTiON NGTES �g���
� � ' ,. w�canucia�.0 i nvwa�E ra uwma.ro a�o�a a
i. �u eiv�nae wi u�oi wi�wvm rwnwrv o�nr�s frn�a w,w
� , www�c..aw�aran ro once a�ic�natrn rww n[fa rrw
�'� z �°�' o s wm u.oi co��oaic uN[r oMO�w��orm. cc�uianw��me.a�s.�o foc.rxs auu x��ao ro mn�a�wa
e P � a w�cwsnucna�wn w+wa auu cww ro nu[rwq wn a�rwxrc L ao�ac�wo+�oo�Moru wu E m�Kim ro�T w�r eR a m[
�N �ta��n a mt+on a�emM awia u�w Ru�a amc wu
�� '� �[anoaw a n[an v iar�o n�e.�wwar awi tnv'owoa wwiw aer oosn u amrm n.m�o�a noovw o��nw ne
�� uavum a4+oa ra r�mt s nm�wnm. ��
� nc mwian�sr,u�nw sx�u ev�ar ro�u.r��r�e[rmn�w n�x,ro �
wua omo,aowwxa wo�couunaa wxuo�o�oasw�r rwn wo a w M�u�ru�w r-�r�not uns�+n car�c+m ro.nn
NRCYMf RPI��'I M GOWNIO WiMQ�1[t. oosn a�r wrt�s v nc m�m r�x�ae r�M o�r oennr
6 AE COIIRKNI llNl R IQ71lL IOt OOaON�1M0 NL RKWlM M9 NL w^O'�wnw w.ava ro rnr x'ocvm ar wn raoon�orna�. ,\
LOCATOR MAP ��m nc we�. " M�'",c,a"'"'m"�""`"°°"'b`��"�.'"°
a auv�mm wn oo�r��u�ow�ane a aa m�.sa ro�n�.si wauoMO wnw�r ra nc�r wK ui a•usR
---- wmana a�u ranc+r o��ues a.aown a aoaa�aw un�w a w�a�r rn�war�umaro m aua�win�arrt anmi wwq
T(�O(CT M[A AT 1lAii N RI!(a-0�Y MM6,NT NOT Yp!MM 10 M10R,Mi Mp 1[1���pp1f.
•IY[S pAf7.BO MAT fAO URII[]Y�Y�Af.MI1F�v�qUim pOC
071�O�C�IG IM1 GCAV�IIIX l '07�l01 lIML!I<WIL�011{r1101 D110�0 11R Tlqlll pYM� � �
3 f. M IOC�T01 OI OY�lN10 lMOO1WpI1D Unl/R3 lq�l On 1ME 0.MS iS rVl
., aiar�na aar wa n Ho.aiwwmv ro ec mr�[a a�.m�.h.oam�cra� f. �D1Ni ILL NmO1TK f1A1C1lRL YMIAE{AL.WL'S MKt[1C 10 �
- 8W1 4VrT ULVATONS M[f2[.NO YAIERK T�1[ff Ml UIOOPPtO.1M0 uilUtO fM�m Y41R �� �
vwae m m�vca�a wm oarsmucnw iu+o��u ma wn asu[vwacs ro n�[
- � ��no�a na�w sownaia n wna vnae ro�rwrt a oonsmicnan. • �ws.rioo'ouv�r�.r�c uras nro rKVU.�auv�nwi �i
l M OIAmt pl 0'*GI If NOi RlM�ll�0�M 6N[h'0 M fANiMC1911 011 9. T1E mfINACTO!9W1 VIWQ ALL 1NIFRWLf MO U��0 L9N.C1[
n_ i � XM Ot1.N1 O.L1.A RWLAiqM M�LI R�neCiLY 10101m 10 N TIE �K YW�f01 M S1p01 YVR�T A[LQAIIG4.SR[i Yi T![T Af a t h
L RRaYMIQ ff M�17�t. S�Uw O�TN[RNR. iN�l fEVERS f�wl IE LW p�IMI[KfON[Nf IM q q �
= �un vV[rQG 9[!KC r0 M ARML K OOM�OI M'lMR AC y e
%. � L lplqlNlV/IO'WMQIT Q�UI OAIIIIQ 1[�LK/11M1 R Y�M 1p�. LAYUIG 1111LL CG01�T iK LW POMf R M MTi71 MU�Cm {
^ M OONTIi1CI011 M/LL n011f1t 10 MT C�TOWI A{/�Mtl'I011 O1G�011 WtACC VRX Ylmi C1mi/�1iP4 VWOE ° y �
j - v. oana�ic.uun w rarvn�r�w.mnc o.v.c�nx wo nTrn�:ew.�cwaw ro�srM � p e
� -- 16 M OONAAC101 I�1�7Wlf i011 YMMTMIMO ML�IOMMM 1@MO Td OLNY OAN 301]6.M JW1f4 9Mll IE PlE%IR[VfTM QEASTOQIC RM.i
� -_— ND IIIQ 01 OOMlIIIUC11011 MA1pN.t Mq O�Ml.MO NIOM�q 1[QYMIY OUR co�o�mc m�srn o-aeu wm.rrw r�n.cwnuc.a awi novn[
. I 10. �����Ra�l�. flTTpqS MIE TWRT01 CVA.iNGS COP�T[RC VITN KV AMO dif�pq
.._J 11.60[�WO►1M6 IMt�AOF U11UW Y�htlUll!CQI1ti1Cld!10 iM�[V MO iTall�PIMS Ai IL4iiMT.
-�'�' - _ i�. Rcao rcraM[�n a uuer wc�na�xo oenw.
�, a vwns s�auo i consnucrzn�n nc wur�s.cuvnva w10
12 NL Iall75 MO U�1lt KGYLMV idt T[OEWiqN ND OQ�lE1qM Oo rM( OIKNfm11S AS SlaVN OI M PLMR.[METS 9M11 K SET RUO TO LP[
, ..��� I2. 91ALL t�.Vlm�1'M OONIMC101 Pl�d!70 WIYOIGMO Opll1NC1171. wm wa�wo s�u prsr a�cNCSU�r a+�o�n,u��row�c�pc wc
) - MMLLC i11N1C MIO mVO15 SWLI C UST-RNM CU4Tw1Ci��S
y -_- 13 Odl[OO�OIQIq OOI[TtKllpl�M OOITIACIQt fWl1 MO7►T ALL lG1�RMT 9UKQ0.
, , Op�N�011/-0pll,0�M UpOqlAllp UlUld M M NID�[CI All[A�0 MAT
O ; t], fM0 URIR7 YAT t KQMU76�IOCFim. IL TIp4�F4NMTW �IYLL L C1GV�lEO f0 LIITAFS AIpUGE NIO
a . wrtcrm w amrco�x v�cu a m�m�roa�[auoc�nu�*�
c � . jpE Y ,;. �.ne iaana v onna uimwaso ueum�aw a mc rwa b ra w�woc rowrm w�r i mwrs um�rco«ax o�com.
r - - war�na w.r wo s eor awuw�m n i�oa��n. roma[�u aof�w�
„..•��' 1w K�E�MY�01[071JIIIYCTON 10 NIFNMf OIIIM M10 NJO�RMT Od11UC1S
o . 16 OOMIRK'101 f4Y1 1OtY 6[YAAONf Q ML 11100171QIIO YAJ7[{FlI1011 A
� L/i, �6 Op�lLL�C�111N OOI�nYC7qN MO/ML wO MI�Oif00�1M7Lf 70 M�T1d9P�
o ��� �I � 01 l101�q 76L1101L
m �u Y� 1{. il MJlff Ml N�ITAL 111VE11�YN�IQ[tDl WLK�OO[1C fi aUOL �
/ - 3�
v � _- n.m�o�[a f�w a�uewr�ix[aa�aro m n[�sa oe M[aanue�a
� .,�� � -� y, suu�wx vc wsa�un ra nf oaa wo r�oouet rorwuwo[.wc
� �wrr cariavK s�am ra no�n-a�aT o.n suu R aaeo raw�
d � KR�,YR NOI.OOIIO<1C 1WL t RA�N �1M�IWCIICb N9
� 11. RlA�BOA9W!O M NO�CNI L01OR1[/1ln1U4.
� 16 11�01 10�IIMrt 6 OcA�QIIR tlt OifIMO 1RIAlWL K tlfNlm.M
y Pml1'1l1N evlc�IG�1r f�M1 L Ml�N M ML�OM R M CpITKT
y VICINITY MAP �� ��M���'���'�
.�' N.SI�IIOJT f111MWT W1WlO 10 GfAR R�IIR AIT ti�l TI[ORIMO��WOIT
0 1�. yp M�►�Yl1qlT.
a M T[CdIFMCTM 1�Rlqllti Ipl OpIWTO�0�OIi1N0 AC.O�N��[MIKf.
� wo ona arz naorn wnw�si r�oatr wrw i
q
_ \,rs\fsp�o�cts��a�phere\beaverto�honda� �eavcrtonhondaconshuction_dwg
�
r 4,
R
a�
�� 1
�", L �i,_ ,{i
� f�'�l c�D Z r�-� =
��o a c�v� ,,
r� �.-,� _ _.
�Ad�� r. n
n�
o Z c� „ ,
°�c�A� v _� < �rX -
D 0 1 f*'I� �n f'1 rTl -
Z ZOD �Z '� rv� -
� � t, �
Z Z
S3JJV �� ��
5�3)
g�
py . �ti'CSB_ 3.St8u.,6�- �
- �
i. � SS �t/ v -` ----
� 3 t3) � �
9NIAbd — �__ �
8 `JNIISIX3 -t-
_---
�o� � . ---
�
I 9NIAVd
� 9N11SIX3
i
I� ,
,�� , i ,
:i I
`� I
, �
g8 I .
\ H�lI4 -----_.__ _.--J I
�JNllSIX3
9N1Abd �
9NI15IX3 I
I
----,.--�.._, i ;
� ---�_ - - - � '
�*°'°�� ���,e«,e SITE OVERVIEW °"`
e� ,,,,� �
'�% �'�q�,�p� fJCAVERTON HONDA 2
�,,, ��/ Y 10685 SW GREENBURG R� �
�� �� '�� TIGARD, OREGON C
� onrc.ziz..us rw.cc..�rn-ro� Cl
x++.e � , -
� i � C�b�
�
o �
EXISTING BUILDIN � .
� �
° °Z
_
x..� x�al Q °�c°�
�W
XISTING SCALE VAUL a �3 0
OUTFALLTO w ;�&
XISTING N:4723.0790 PROPERTY F— `°` �
CULVERTS /'� l000�.aieo N cn m°� N
/ POINT: PK � xrea x10�' "
n� � F— � � I Xuto Xuea X a
/� ____— I
Xw �
����� PROTECT P�LE� N DGE A/C °X,,,, 3��8�
10D o xw �
��iCaat V �!`�
Xwe � xsia � 'W E t
xw.r � X� Y.a+s �/i
%ra y
1 Xr�a Xx� � xws �
x� �
Xsu X� V Xau X�a.
TREES 10° ``
� wa Xwe.a x"�D xw.■ • . �
� M� -� �l
HAIN-LINK x�"
EXISTING DITC FENCE 0 20 40 60 1`
PLAN VIEW TREE �
� scale: 1"= 20' �°µ
_ �� � �j
j
� � � 9
o � � p eJ
? CrossSectlon-1 CrossSection-2
� 120.0 120.0 120.0 120.0
110.0 110,0 110.0 110.0
1 .5' 1 4'
0
0 100.0 100.0 100,0 100,0
; N HW �
a, 90.0 90,0 90,0 HW 90.0 �
v
; 80.0 80,0 80.0 80.0
n
.4.
� SECTION 1 SECTION 2 e
/ i
% p
x,�.s � � �b cC
$
° �
IPE—END � w
� IE=+/-97.5 ° � Zm g
x,�, C�NTRACTOR x�.� w °W o
T� FIELD VERIFY � Z��
AFTER EXCAVATION _ DITCH INLET a �N°
SAW CUT A/C N:47Z3.0790 SEE SHEET O Q��
B❑TH SIDES iooa�.aieo � IE=+/— 99.5 � mo� g
POINT: PK o 1°' xuea x� �
,» � """ C O N N E C T S C L E D R A I N x»G x� x a
EM�VE EXISTING 'w EW CU VERT i '°" � ��
x�».�DUCTILE��UL VERTS y � 90 LF 24' PIPE °x,,,., j���£
� r.w+
X� . = S=0.0069 APPR�X, 'W ����
,.�.
xw.+ vi
• �� v�u .. x� N
�x"°' �°° xe" °
x»s a' x�w.. �
DEFLECT PIPE �ao x� X,o�x,,,�, z R�
❑R FITTING EM�VE „. �
AS REQUIRED BUSH/TREE '�
IP—RAP ❑UTFALL REMOVE TREES 0 20 40 60 � ,�
CLASS 2 ODOT REMOVE/REL❑CATE pLqN VIEW
c EXISTING FENCE
Sco%: 1'= 10' pg `�
: � p '
o �- y !
'+ 6
o � � �¢ �
�
o � p e
° CrossSectlon-1 CrossSectfon-2
d
120.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 n
A —GR VEL
110.0 ll0,0 110.0 110.0
7 .5' 1 4'
c
a 100.0 100.0 100,0 100.0
; N H W �!
� 90,0 90.0 90,0 H W 90.0 �
v P ❑PD ED P ❑PO ED
a PPE PPE
0 80.0 80.0 60.0 80.0
�
� SECTION 1 SECTION 2
% a
% q
—� � ��t�
�
�
�
�� ��u�N��' � �
<�
om
Z?
o,�,,o
OEIECi/i9�[NARdMG TAPE _�t�
E1CST.AC N Z�';r
J o3�
�sr,�- v.•:� ^�' �aoo n Q �;n
� -u"r�n' Y„ :.-x:... AOJALENT A/C COIOIE7E � � y��O
PIPE BiW61LL FM9� >
(OPnON OEPElGF)IT) E1nST.A4 9UIFACE �¢
W a
x�• � m°� g
a��'�oa '.-� �aH. ; f R '� a
o+e�r�or[nr � � vau�w�na . ' ����
GEOTEXME R� . I
•s-raauwm ocvn�rcn jp6�
� ( ccaica � vre aa - �I' 3���
er aoi[a) nun c'vQ+ pa� 8
.. _ , _ ws�cna+ vuw .. I!''
� � _ ii" �t��
1. 1I�PAbEYEMT 7EC11Q1—1�K 01iEP!�COIiAC1EC CRAYEl
-_�--_�„ � � � � �
, PIPE BEDDWG & BACKFILL 1� ., ., , .� ''•:� � �.
s .. �
, � ' �i :'-3�/e•• I,: ��`
Faw�nax . r-3�/e' (1
_ �
Mo�s:
�.cane�croa ro wocn cxc�v�na+�s�cwao ro arwN ar�cnw
�, wm cam�craes caa�cna Ea�vrenr. a�" Vt�
v � �
o z DITCH INLET ��� � � j
- y . , 6
�
� � � �
� SHEET NOTES: � , "
ADJUST PIPE BACKFILL BASED ON � �
SELECTED BID ALTERNATE. �
c
" PIPE ALTERNATE 1: ASTM-3034 OR C76CVRCP
BACKFILL 50-150 PSI CDF
- PIPE ALTERNATE 2: CLASS 50 D.I. PIPE
- BACKFILL ��—MINUS COMPACTED GRAVEL
�
�
�
�
e
i a
i Q
�. I
EROSION CONTROL PL,4N NO7tS WAT�R gvPl� - ,_,MENDATIONS � � ��
ATfACN FlLTER
FIBIiIC TO STANES L�RIUCNI 6 MESPONSIM.[TO DEVE�M�0If01 CTK3 STMTELI' J �
1. APPIIOVK�iW3 9M'9Q�/SfDI�JITAMM Cp11ROL IESCI RAX OQS NOT 4�ACGPTAlE MFM10S RQlCL.lNE,EI1NEfl RlPRG O!fNAVItY FLOV O p
OW411N1E IN/PPIIWIiI Of VflYMRMT ROM tl!p1NNYZ OE9Q1(EA�93 MD I[TIGOi TEIPoR�TV�EIME/STRUCTIAES W1Y rt PC�16E6 �
IAC�TOx R 110M4�10114 61MME11 lElENT011 FACl11�E3.UR11E8.E1C.} 2�t1�'M70D POST OR L tY��ti SNM.I L S[IEO Nt tYPIUL SU�EI!ROVS. �y
iILTER FABPoC S7EEL FENCf POST L IN TfE fASE��L�RGE RRO1 EvENT WNTRI1LlIA IN/C REOJOKO LL C7 �
2 lIS MROlJIT�Td1 p T[R C!L M.MIS Nq M CpRT1UC110l.YAMICMNILL ' TO RRP VDlt NKw KTER CVENT P4SSE3 TO(�1TME WtlL ��
�..�ra uv«�a�s a nag cx r�aunn is nc aesa+asun a . .. n�rnaNC NernHC a� w
H0 Z
nc owner�crop uMm�u mNSn�ucna is cam�im�wo�ra�w�m uo e�amu � � ':i � �s�wx�o Y.�OBITfONK Y9NMTR1 IIOCIC TO LTqA[2C iVMMTmI ME�IM M om �
me
PERY�NFNr YECEt�l10N/1JNDlCAA1C IS ESf/�Hll1lm. SRfl101 � j i I �N:�-: GSE 01'M61 v�TER IS TE 11ESPQISIpLITY S M CONTIMCNl. O Z Z Zp
S l�ff BounDNOEe as n�E GIEMINO UM15!row a1 MId PuM lNNL!E G1iM6Y 3 � �� ii ElOST.17t0UND U O W(�
FUGOEO N lflE FIF1D PIOOR TO Wl1411lICIW1.dIRNO TIE tpISiR11C710N OWm, �
Ho aSrunBNiCE BEtONO T1E iL�00E0 QEMMO WA 11N1 t RTMTIFD.TE � . r$ TO STAKES Z(�w�
iIACCING 91I�LL�YN1TM�!Y TIE CWTI�tTp1 f011 AE OURATIOl1 OF Z
casmucna+. ' . O ��C
1. TIE EfC fKWTE9 9MqW ON 1MS PIMI W!T E WNfTWL1ED N fANANC110N - �
Milfl ML 6FNIM0 ANO pIMM6 K11M1[7.NO N RWI�Y�NEfI AS 10 OISJIE � .� (� j'n K
TI�T 7lMp11017 MIO!dY[MT LIDl11 NA1Fl1 00 MOT 011l1�iN[q1M1A�7YllEH. a W Q
�
M T ���Y��� 'tr�,.-m
no� an.ia�a�vvuwc ia a�noNOa ..
ra 0
s nc cx v.cu�s s�ow'a n�a ww u�n�w�w ecwwm�n rw . , � . � m o� �
�wnur�i[v da m/p�wni oumnc n�t canemucna rveao�n�cx - _ . .
r�wnn sina x unae�ao�e n¢om ra uMOVCCi[n ataa[�rs.w ro w -
v,si�[m�r mdr�no=cwmr ww wmf oo�wr�u�c ra m.
s n�[pe v�wnn auu a[i�w o�cr or nc w+m�ciart uo uunr�wm
ia r�ms�r ro eMawe naw eanwm ruxcnas+e. Hohs:
�. nc eac r�auncs a w�emc ahs wu a wsce�w�o�wMr�n• i.wsrw.�noq sHUi ralow n�wu+ur�ctuaa+s ����
. wwu�or ar��raun�a MTW M 2�MqNI!i'OlLO11�M�4f01Y fldT. p[roAWQ1DATI0N5. �£a�£
s �r�a n�anu wac new oxa roor a�v+T e��uorco m kawuh �/
wnw�ne�rm uia s�.�u ura s•�s uu oox�cvu�a u�o suu z cem+r�nc-ux u�wwiu ov x'woc nau. 3`
YE a[N4v Flsax ra v�w�G n�E ttF+1HMO aPERAna�11llt rar rw9�snYFnr �a 6!
�"°'"""'E""ro"'E°°"""E"""'°i. t S E D I M E N T F E N C E r
�. lT�IIIC OOM011NCMM EM111AMtl!ffN1 BE MSTNIFD�t TK lEOMIWO Of ...
taramucna wa�µr�xm ron nc wu�av n¢wro�ct.�odaaK 6
YEAIASS 4�Y E P[dMRC TO FN!!R TIAT ML P�YFD MEA9 NS IfEPT f1FAM
ra n�c ow�na a nc naaccc �
PLAN VIEW �`'�;
,�, � �
X,�, x� --- I
�
� BYPASS �g" �
° CHECK STRUCTUR�23.o�90 �� �`��
; � tooa�.aiso �
� 3 / POTNT:PK � � Xuta Xta�e X� ¢ �
v° �L�� x� Xm�.e � y �
� � WATER BYPASS � p
a ,,,;• SYSTEM CBIDDER x� BYPASS �
"''��' x9/� DESIGNED) CHECK STRUCTURE
o xuos x� xs>z
- X+f,� Xyf,� Xa>w Kxus z
�pp XwLt
� x,.a, x,s� � xwu
Xsf.6 X9a9 . XtNA
� Xsu
v
o �� XIYei XIOOS XI!1l.3 X10.7 . . .
t
1!!
0
�
v 0 20 40 60 �
j W
v STAGING AREA
� PR�TECTED BY Scole.• 1"= 20'
� EROSI�N FENCE
v
0
a
� e
a
4
v .
r _
• Beave�ton Honda, 10685 SW Greenburg Rd, water quality swd�e calculations
� Using CWS design and construction criteria:
Water quality event = 0.36" of rain in 4 hours with a retu�n period of 96 hours
Calculate water quality volume (WQ� and water quality flow (WQF) as follows:
WQV(cf)= 0.36(in)xArea(sf)
12(in l ft)
and;
WQF(cfs)= wQVcf
14400s
NO BUILDINGS OR PAVING IS PROPOSED AS PART OF THIS PR�JECT. WORK
WILL IS IN PREPERATION FOR FUTURE IMPROVEMETNS THAT WILL INTEGRATE
STORMWATER TREATMENT AND DETENTION. THE FOLLOWING ARE
ESTIMATED AREAS FOR FUTURE WORK.
Total impervious area draining to the proposed future water quaiity facility = 36,300sf
pavement + 29,OOOsf roof area = 65,300sf
Therefore the water quality volume for this site:
wQv _ 0.36"x65300sf) _1959cf
12(in/ft)
and;
wQF_ 1959cf _0.136cfs (say 0.14cfs)
14400s
tn order to treat this volume in a constructed water quality wetland: (CWS appendix B)
1. Permanent storage = 0.55WQV= 1077.5cf
2. Water qua{ity detention volume = 1.OxWQV= 1959cf
Using a trapezoidal channel with a top width (a) of 15', a depth of 1' and 3:1 side slopes;
the following table indicates the storage volume for design depths in a 195' channel.
h (ft) a(ft) b(ft) A(s� L(ft) Vol(c�
0.40 11.40 9.00 4.08 195.00 795.60
0.50 12.00 9.00 5.25 195.00 1023.75
0.52 12.12 9.00 5.49 195.00 1070.78
0.53 12.18 9.00 5.61 195.00 1094.48
0.86 14.16 9.00 9.96 195.00 1941.97
0.87 14.22 9.00 10.10 195.00 1969.64
1.00 15.00 9.00 12.00 195.00 2340.00
Using a minimum depth of 0.53' and a maximum of 0.87'for detention, the required
orifice would be 0.01".
The overflow weir elevation would be set at 1.0' above the bottom of the channel.
�
- - .�
I
�
�
�
���
�
-- - -:.,... �s.<�:'. . _ `'�a`�a+�'x x3;:��nr�s::s�.s����.
I �
�.
,
� � �--� � .
r -�z—�� � ", , .
� t �r � �r _�► . ' �
� _ s�r-ar �9p�� � � .
� � � Q�� .
� �`�
y:� �� 5�z0
y . �Q
1�`
u.,
ua
nect t � � M
exi �-
p '�' . _ all ��� � �'
. ; ,� �� o� �
. �a�'� . ^ ° 4
, ��, � � o�� � � �
�l : v 1 y� �! � �
� �
. EXISTING � �Z� V
;� . . PAVING a � � p
a
'�� W
�' ° '�' SrO� � m �
,. �te�• N
•` ��Q�__ H
.� :p �
. : ' s • � + .-�-�i+� �
. . • � . , jI
' '� ' ► y • S, • s' r` r
�: � " + ► ♦ �/�
�L � ' ' + - YI
.� Z� . . . . . • . . y M
� :�I( �• � . . c �•° _ •' ' F• B�It
� �t ' ` �RC;PQSEb � � r� ~
o�
� .� � , . ��:PA�I±IG '� ° i � w�terF�o � .
v � . bV__ _
R •. - 4•. . •: ..
� �, , . . U
s � ° . ►� . .r ' � • . .
� �. i .�, � � i. � . �• •'. .s�� r ' � + � N s �.�+ �
� . � r.
O � ` . . . •►• � • •• �
� r.�' d. r � •, '• '�. •► �
� I ' r v . � . � � � pk �,�+ " �
� � � •. - t � .
.� .
8 f r� .t , .' .- . .� .
. �b , :� . ` �`o � �
Q E�� .p ,�• . o _. � a� .
�" . � . •� . � , . . o. �
� � .:.._..���•:�- r F/
t
�
� r �
� In ti trap �nd Pip�/Bactdfil Ditch a�
g � �x a� ~ _
� lo " i , �` �..
Q t� ,,o
� �n t .
� e7cj n SySte'rtt Corps Flle No.200500107
A •
� SHEET_�7LE;� 10/18/05
4 ���� OJECT: BEAVERTON HONpA �
,� ° � 10685 SW GREENBURG RD SHEET N0.
� f �� �,�,�.
% � ��2°� COE/DSI. PERMIT APPUCA?lON � 5�
0
Fn�In�t�rE� 1
-�, •� '. :� r �•' �' as� it •
s�.
.. � \ . �. �� ' +'
,
.' � .� M ' •�
f�-r�--- -- s�-'� .' ' ' _. � . -
I' �Y t •'� ` � �� ' '�Y�� '.�' ' �r .�
'� I7 r��•���' \�\•��..� I \ � � � .•�� . .�. • '�
� � I� �,���\{,ti � ,�'\ �`. � ' �.;��.
y�j"; \��'� ,� .�`'"� �'• 'r '� .s`` �-
�` � ' :
� ��.
r''� ,� �� �, "` � ,' � " � '�: i .;�►'
"�e�e �� �� ��� \\\ �h�" ` ��'� ' �� $ ` �
�/'� � � ] � � ,� . . / +ry
V/ • � �
> �� �;A `�'`, � � , �� �
� '` � { ` 1�
� � � � � : 7 A �! . , a
D a.�,� � ���,�,' , .; � , � � ) �
�r.: '� ,�Y,'f�','�;� ,` � I`' . ,�r' j '
r ,�'r44+�; � �
� ► •r s � `•� �ss;��� '4
.� � � � ' ,�' , �1 e��� _ � - , � �� � �,,�
�. r�' `_ �. ,�:�L2+� . � +'��jCr�i iy` ;�-�
_ �!;" � �, ' -_$ '� ••, -- -�� =i,�, �
� � �.
._�'', a - �' ;�;`. .-�
� , ,
r, �
��
�= � ,i ��
� ' . � • � ,�
.�
,� ' �� - -- ' - � e � ., �
� -" .+ -� t -- ► - - -�
� � �
� , w�- ,1 � �; . �'"" ,�'�
! i ;� ► .- ---- ---- � 1; t �
_ � �' '� �-�
�' ,'r� 11 �I ��� �1� �� �. �� •''�,� .,f�. � at � -''`*�' .
M '�t►.v �� , „�"r!!� �
�P� ' �._ '�
��: �.i� �,a ■ ' ' � �� �=' "'�' '� � t�� ��' � '
� ' i R . ,s�� - ,� ' �- — t � r
� � r j , 5.��� . � ' �
� } ,`` �` �,y�,� •- F , 1 � 1 �� +! .
�� � b� ,
i�,. y�. � � ;
' �� ' �,'";'.��'�� ''• ;�.i� �� , 1 N ,�. 1TC`i� N�l ��, F.� .
�� �' �,• . , ,. , �
� . �. y .t. l �;
,. h.K ,�� ; _ `J�(^ � � .
�' �, .�• ' ,.�,,�'�z;�'� � - , e � �,�� . �� �.
� �� ir •< '=�. � •, 1 �•� �C�i �
�' r��.'� ,� �-�.� t.�' �,��1=;, � ..._.. .�. ..�.:t'�!•>. . s� •�� `.; , a. I_l.i 1.. ... �. ..\ . �.
�j �
� ,•'� r� 'ri� _ �`. , � �.. , �^�. ;1. . 1
tl �.. i 3 �. � ' �� -� � �, �\
"I , JD'� ., . . ��1 . •�� . . .. ..
1 f �.• � � �1i1 '
�I' ' .lf''� �.��.,� I _.1 � �+r�, . . ", - ��
V ,�'
� L �
1L __. _. .. i� . • -_ - . . .
yl
� '� � ��-� ! � �.-- - --- - -�.� � �) 1 � _� �� -
�'•� --- �.—.--._..
. �` -+a= �1!_.- �i.
It:�'" � ; ..�. � .:� , %T � �;'�_:`_- , . , __ _ .. -� _
��"`.� �� . �t �� I . � . ....«.,.._.. �
� ' `� �a• ���.4 �� �� �r�' 'T � /, .
, � �.
�. � y �M /
' K i y■ I y
`��� � ��` `�.�: I � l . :�" ;�' �
�. t.
�4� ` . .. .'1� L �, t� . .� � �, �`, . __-"._ ����.
\ ..
1��r_ < �,j�:�fr �' j
1� , � ��- � �
�,+r �� : {*�^� '�- � �.. , }:
''`� �.,.�;,�� � . •��`�=`k �,. � .►r"',�'� � � A �
' �'. � •.C�
w \,�`� �a�' K � j: ��� �
�, � �,.a�i� "�`'r; r�,�+.�;r� � � ' n� i . !
�\'y„_�F i � .J �jt�`- , �""` � .h"; � �'_ „
� \ �,��.�:`.� .�. , ,�` "a i 1 .1 ; ti l �� ,9
. ... 7►•� _ � ,M,1�,.� �,,,r �i�,,,r "��,�t.� � .� i� ,
�;��r �'� � AV E � _ �''�"` ' � y - /
__.. '_ \ ..Y�r - .___ \��,4��• � �� �'� ♦'Y��
t
_ q
�
assessor
Assessor Information
Tax �ot rvumber: 151356,403300
Property Address: 10585 SW GREENBURG RD
Mailing Information:
UNIVERSUS
442 GLENWOOD DR
OXNARD
93030
Assessor Taxlot Size: 3.65 (,4cres)
Building Square Footage: 0 (Square Feet)
assessed �and value: $1144760
,4ssessed Building value: $2324740
Total ,4ssessed value: 53469500
�ast sale �ate:
Sale Price: $0
Page 1
5
I
►
27 26 '°� z ' ;�
„
., - -- '° 35B
O •�� 71WOMH �
\ 2 --
y �<. B A
;-i
y 30 t�_� BB 65 C D
C'> P � -
�_
T 5z, 29t 28[ 0 6 � 68i
C�
� �� 12/03/2003
�p J MAGIC PRT
Q �53 � 06/16/2004
51N
� �z _r • Pu�i�c we�er o�arry Fadiiry
60 � -- * Pnvale Waler Qua�iry Facilry
\ Q . 27 \
� � 1 f--
n �
� 2� I 26
� }8 25
21 24
0
19 - z3 I �7
� » —
7� �. 17 -- — - � 3 -
I
� 1 —
�` � _ PVE CB d 4NE gTATE
� 41
10 a-'°e'�'u
STATE �e
4 qz `
� 39
a5 3 � 5
a���q s - - -
\ -�- 3z
� 94t 36t �Bt 33 37t
7T 1t 11
5 � st
T
16 _— -
� - — -
72 � I
PL �
is 8
� 6RiDGE , � -.-
t �QQ 08�8 7� * 7 -
i \ 9 z 88B�B000 10 - -
�°° � �
1��� 1 4I 5 _. e„ a J-��
Environmental
Report
� Oregon Department of Environmental Quality
Conditions for Compliance with Section 401 of the Clean Water Act
1. Turbidity/Erosion Controls-The permittee shall ensure the authorized work does not cause the
turbidity of affected waters to exceed 10%over natural background turbidity 100 feet downstream from
the activity causing the turbidity. For projects proposed in areas with no discernible gradient break
(gradient of 2%or less),monitoring must be done at 4 hour intervals and the turbidity standard may be
exceeded for a maximum of one monitoring interval per 24 hour work period provided all practicable
control measures have been implemented. This turbidity standard exceedance interval applies only to
coastal lowlands and floodplains,valley bottoms and other low-lying and/or relatively flat land. For
projects in all other areas,the turbidity standard may be exceeded for a maximum of 2 hours(limited
duration)provided all practicable erosion control measures have been implemented.
Turbidity must be monitored during active in-water work periods. Monitoring points must be at an
undisturbed site(representative background) 100 feet upstream from the turbidity causing activity(i.e.,
fill or discharge point), 100 feet downstream from the fill point, and at the point of fill. A turbidimeter
is recomrnended,however, visual gauging is acceptable. Turbidity that is visible over background is
considered to exceed the standard.
Practicable erosion control measures must be implemented. Such measures must include,but are not
limited to, the following:
a. Place fill in the water using methods that avoid disturbance to the maximum practicable extent(e.g.
placing�11 with a machine rather than end-dumping from a truck).
b. Prevent all construction materials and debris from entering waterway;
c. Use filter bags, sediment fences, sediment traps or catch basins, silt curtains, leave strips or berms,
Jersey barriers, sand bags,or other measures sufficient to prevent movement of soil;
d. Use impervious materials to cover stockpiles when unattended or during rain event;
e. Erosion control measures shall be inspected and maintained daily to ensure their continued
effectiveness;
f. No heavy machinery in a wetland or other waterway;
g. Use a gravel staging area and construction access;
h. Fence off planted areas to protect from disturbance and/or erosion; and
i. Flag or fence off wetlands adjacent to the construction area.
Turbidity must be measured(or visually assessed)and recorded at the designated monitoring interval
prescribed above during periods of active construction. The designated person attending the monitoring
equipment shall be responsible for notifying the project foreman of any exceedance of the turbidity
standard. If a 10%exceedance of the background level occurs at 100 feet below the proj ect site,modify
the activity causing the problem and continue to monitor at the proper interval. If exceedances occur with
two consecutive measurements the activity causing the turbidity must be stopped until the problem is
resolved.
Enclosure �.
� 2. In-Water Work Periods-All in-water work, including temporary fills or structures,may be
und'ertaken only during the time periods recommended by Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife
(ODFW) for in-water work specified in the most current version of Oregon Guidelines or Timin�ofln-
Water Work to Protect Fish and Wildlife Resources. An exception is allowed only with specific
approval from the USACE after consultation with ODFW or National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS). On tribal lands,the USACE will coordinate exceptions with the U.S. Environmental Agency
(LISEPA)
3. Riparian Vegetation Protection and Restoration-Riparian,wetland, and shoreline vegetation in the
project area must be protected from disturbance to the maximum extent possible and be restored and
enhanced when unavoidably disturbed due to activities associated with the authorized work. All
damaged or destroyed vegetation must be replaced with native plant materials. The standard for success
is 75% areal coverage after the fifth growing season for native plant species that replace the habitat type
lost or damaged. Planted areas must be temporarily fenced, or otherwise protected from damage,until
the vegetation is established. Project sites must be revegetated to the extent possible up to the bankfull
stage or line of non-aquatic vegetation, whichever is greater. When any wetland areas are adversely
affected,revegetation must extend to the upland limits of the wetland area.
4. Stormwater- Stormwater from any authorized activity, conveyed or discharged to a water of the state,
must be treated by a facility specifically designed to remove stormwater contaminants before entering
streams, wetlands, or other waters of the state, including mitigation wetlands, so as to minimize
pollutants entering those water bodies.
5. Bank Stabilization-The linear threshold for bank stabilization projects under any nationwide is 250
feet. All projects exceeding the threshold require individual water quality certification.
a. Bioengineering is required: Native plantings, such as willow saplings,must be incorporated into
stream bank stabilization structures in order to provide bank erosion protection,variable habitat for
wildlife, and shade. [See the Division of State Lands Guidelines On Riparian Restoration:
BioenQineerin�, included in their 1996 Erosion Control General Authorization.]
b. The project must not include retaining walls,bulkheads,gabions or similar vertical structures.
�nclosure �
Complia�ce Certification
v
Project County:
Permit Number: �C9-� ;SC1,�(��
Date of Issuance:
Name of Permittee:
I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit, has been
completed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the said permit, and that
required mitigation was completed in accordance with the permit conditions, except as
described below.
Signature of Permittee
Encl 5
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Portland District (CENWP-OP-G)
P. O. Box 2946
Portland, OR 97208-2946
, i
• � � �
.�- ,
��L
C1eanWater Services �
t)�ir .uitiui���nu�it �. �I��.tr
�p�CE1VED
September h 9, 2oos � SEP Z '� 2005
Lanphere Ent�erprise5
12520 S.W. Canyon Rd.
Beaverton, OR 97045
RE: Replace Ditch with Culve�t and Creation af New Swale/Linear Pond at 10GS5
810B8S S.IM.Greanburg Rosd,Tigard, OR(1S135bb40700,S00)
CWS#OS-OOQ037 ,
�
Clean Water Services has neceived yaur Sensitive AYea Cettification t�or the above
refer�nCed ske. The project site Cor�tains a sensitive area (drainage)that flows Trom
narth to south through the site. The project is to consist of a number of proposed
activ+ties: 1.)replacing the ditch at westem edge of Tax lot 8Q0 with a cutvert end
creating a new watar qualily swala/linear pond at the southem ed'g�of Tax bt 800.
District staff has reviewed the suhmitted materials induding slte cqnditions and the
description of your proje�� Based on the submitted materials and a staff site visit on
January 13, 2005, it appears that no vegetated buffer applies to the sensitive area
(drainage)since existing impervious surfaces extend to the edge of the drainage.
Further, the proposed activity is not considered redevebpment since less than 10
percent of the existing impervious area within 100 feet of the sensitive area wil! be
altered. In liqht of this result, this document will serve as your Service Provider letter as
required by Resolution and Order 049, 5ection 3.02.1, and your�itormwater Conr►ection
Pertnit e�thorization from Clean Water 5ervices as regu��ed by Ordina�ce 27, Section
4.B. AU requir�d petmits and approvels Inus#be obtained and cor�pleted under
applic�ble tocat, state, and federal law.
This letter does NOT eliminate the need to protect Sensitive Areas if they are
subsequernly ideniified on your site. ... . -
T 's Service P�rovitder Lettcr ia not vulid unless CW a roved s�te is atta
If "'�ce any questions, please feel free to catl me at 503-681-3�13.
!
i ly,� �
�
s Case�►'
nvi nbl PI R iew
' Attachments( �
CC. Peter F. Fry '
E;�Acvdoprt�rnt 5vc5�SP 00-7�SPR Lerte�l S 1358A00700.800 add ncw c�oa�is�atd replaee culvett�91405 CwSM 03�00037.doe
2550 5W liillsboro Highway• y���sbOro,Oregon 971 Z3
Phone�biZ'c$1•360�90'ON5031681-3603•www.�leanWate�ServiceS3SIada31N3 3b3HdNH� WdIZ'E S00Z'S 'l��
��is\fspraJecta�lonphcre\bcarartonhonda\cad\beov�rtonhondopermit.dwg •
c
� �4 ��;�,`'`�``�" -.r! �. .� c (�" (:� �'t'8� t��
m _ , •
a �� . . , . - . - - - - --_ -_�_ -..__..,_�.-:_— - rove�
� � � ea a SPro�c�s
�------------- ��..�c:i. C,:�
� � ( �F:v ^� �v� E 6 1L,*�
� �° � �1..1..�1.[ f 1 -�-•- --. .- - .�.,�..�..�_ ----,ti�r C ��� 1`7 `
�u��
Z ���� e�e �.. --_�-,_:.
� �,-�� �
���� . ___ c L 6�� •c�,��- � �L
� � -� •=} ,� �-- ;a.�= ' ' ' ��� ' �-----�� •
� � ( - _ �__-----------._.� � ,
� � ' '��
c� 4.;i .':
� � � �
� ��� � t � 3 �
� �>� ,� _,� '�
r t,
� �2O t,1, • ib
� �� � ; LOT 2 ,,, : ,� LOT i
�g i �.
�11 � C D I �
~ D � � . �:I �
� � o j t .
�
� , .'' :, . " --:��-, : .�oj_
� {` 1' .__•---- -- , .
� '- - - -- • _` l - --- ` - -•• -- - -- -- - -- --
•1 •��1�.� `�� � �_.��-n[�3_.�-_�� _
J --�L. � 1 -. _ - - - -s - - f
j �,�-•- —�•— ..._.:_��- ...---- r�_�_ • 1=_�_ _ ao'
'�— C.til:n •ne ,�1 i'� t. � '�e
� _.__.__.. . - . _ __ .._�—..'__.._'__. .-� . .___��.—___.__... . . ___
N _.,.,---------- --
m � R�place-�Etc� with Culvar�, Creata New Swale/Llnear Pond
� '� °° ' t
� � � � � �
� � Q `
� �
�
� . i
----�.,.�. z �
d
��Er
�Y.� �� j��4
!
���� � ���
�� i��
y' V�
_ , W
nnect to- �
unst,ng o� . � �
. OD03' t�all �� v� ;
� �
.. ._. .�� ^ � _ _ ' �
�t� � � �
� ` �il
�
EXISTING � � V
PA1/YlVG � '� o r♦'i
..� N O
��'�Ni r~+ ~ � Z
.� �e��� N � �
���. 1�
r. �. �.-
, I \t '.I' ~� . n i���
1' J'� � ' l/��
�7 �� r/
� �� �h...��1�' ` . . I
\�
� �` �� � I Z
1� ~
� ' '�� r•-- ' PROPOSED `4�`O,hM� � � F
�`�; ,;.
�-:� �cn .� ' . PAVING •'it �, � a6
� o L d '' �`� W
s� A'�_' -� dM/� �
+..�• 4C� V
�� �J �.: ` a �
�^ � • PI� 2+6
o , .�� _�
$ ` ; � � . . . #or�� �
� ,*o-ca •� � �� �
� `��..
� �7C�1l� PI�/BaC{t�l� D�CI'9 " � . ':
][ns ' Dtl �rap � ;` -
-�._ ,
�at �siea a� �° j t ;,��
� Bow, oi�ts; 'K =• ��` - � 'i ';i.
o COfbf�1 '�Q . o � ~'i
�- f.;
W exi i systetn ` „ �
a ��.� SNE�T TITLE: ja OP W K , . <D�4�:
$ fr a ROJECT: gEAy�R7� WONDA � 8/25/05
� �•1� ���'q�,�,M,a 1Q685 5W GRE£NBURG RD
a o�� �ta�d,on e7azs Tf D GON SkEET Np.
r h,oea�.SOS)29�_s3:a1
� Fm(sos).a��yJ COE/D5L PERMIT APPLICAT10f�i 5�6
bib'd E90'ON S3SIad2131N3 32J3HdNti� WdTZ:E S00Z'S '1�0
I�c:h./�;�Q /�C�y�s
O H� O
:�, ��f:`.��.r.
�. ^ re on Department of State Lands
� �. � �
�f -- -� 775 Summer Street NE,Suite 100
\��_�'°` rht�c�d��re 1:. Kulon�;uski,Go�ernor Salem,OR 97301-1279
° �as9 (503)378-3805
FAX (503)378-4844
OCtober 26, 2005 �n�ww.ore�onstatelands.us.
State Land Board
LB600/33986
PETER FRY Theodore R. Kulongoski
2153 SW MAIN ST., NO. 105 Gc>��ernor
PORTLAND, OR 97205
Bill Bradburv
Re: State Application Number 33986-NSP Secretary of Stare
Unnamed Ditch, Lamphere Enterprises
IZandall Edwards
Dear Mr. Fry: State Treasurer
We have received your application pipe a ditch in Section 35, Township 1 S, Range 1 W, Tax
Lots 700 and 800, Washington County, Oregon. The Department of State Lands requires a
permit if you plan to remove, fill or alter 50 cubic yards or more of material within the banks of
most waters of the state or designated wetlands. State-designated Essential Salmon Habitat
streams and State Scenic Waterways are exceptions in that any amount of removal, fill or
alteration typically requires a permit.
Based on your application, your project involves removal or filling of less than 50 cubic yards of
material in waters that are NOT CURRENTLY DESIGNATED Essential Salmon Habitat or State
Scenic Waterways. Therefore, a state removal-fill permit is not required. Please be advised, all
new stream/road crossings must meet Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife criteria for
providing fish passage.
You must also receive authorization, when required, from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
and local planning department before beginning construction. Please be aware that you must
comply with Oregon Fish Passage Laws. Contact your local Oregon Department of Wildlife
office for more information.
If you have any questions, please call Louise Bos at (503) 378-3805, extension 231.
Sincerely,
CG ��'�Y�n
Michael Morales
Western Region Operations Manager
Wetlands and Waterways Conservation Division
Oregon Department of State Lands
cc: Devin L. Simmons, Oregon Dept. of Fish and Wildlife
Kathryn Harris, Corps of Engineers, Portland District
City of Tigard Planning Dept.
J�.1AttachmentAwestLAS\NSP No State Permd Requved LAS\33986-nsp.doc
�
�"J' DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
,����//� PORTLAND DISTRICT,CORPS OF ENGINEERS
� � P.O.BOX 2946
PORTLAND,OREGON 97208-2946
-�-,�
REPLY TO December 16, 2005
ATTENTION OF:
Operations Division
Regulatory Branch
Corps No.: 200500107
Mr. Peter F. Fry
2153 SW Main#105
Portland, Oregon 97205
Dear Mr. Fry:
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) has received your permit application requesting
Department of the Army authorization to construct an 100-foot long buried storm drain pipe, in
an existing drainage ditch that is hydrologically connected to Ash Creek, and will connect two
existing storm drain pipes, as shown on the enclosed seven drawings identified as Corps File No.
200500107 (Enclosure 1). Construction will involve excavating the existing drainage ditch
contents (organics, oil laden sediment and gravels) and installing a 16-inch diameter pipe in the
excavated ditch. The excavated material will be taken to a landfill for disposal. The installed
drainage pipe will be connccted to the existing storm drain at each end of the ditch. The ditch
will be filled with gravel bedding material, backfilled to existing ground elevation, and paved
over to join two parking areas together. The fill material placed below the ordinary high water
line of the drainage ditch would total approximately 45 cubic yards and impact approximately
0.009 acres of waters of the United States. The project is located within Section 35, Township 1
South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, at Tigard, Washington County, Oregon.
This letter verifies that your project is authorized under the terms and limitations of
Nationwide Permit(NWP)No. 39 (Residential, Commercial, and Institutional Development).
Your activities must be conducted in accordance with the conditions found in Regional
Conditions (Enclosure 2) and ('�eneral Conditions (Enclosure 3)
The Oregon Department of Environmental Quality has provided their Certification
Conditions (Enclosure 4). You must also comply with these conditions.
We also direct your attention to the Regional Conditions (Enclosure 2)that require the
transfer of this permit if the property is sold and General Condition 14 that require you to submit
a signed certificate when the work is completed. A"Compliance Certification" is provided
(Enclosure 5).
Failure to comply with any of the listed conditions could result in the Corps initiating an
enforcement action. This authorization does not obviate the need to obtain other permits where
-2-
required. Permits, such as those required from the Oregon Department of State Lands (ODSL)
under Oregon's Removal /Fill Law, must also be obtained before work begins.
This verification is valid until the NWP is modified, reissued, or revoked. All the existing
NWPs are scheduled to be modified, reissued, or revoked prior to March 18, 2007. It is
incumbent upon you to remain informed of changes to the NWPs. We will issue a public notice
when the NWPs are reissued. Furthermore, if you commence or are under contract to commence
this activity before the date that the relevant nationwide permit is modified or revoked, you will
have twelve (12) months from the date of the modification or revocation of the NWP to complete
the activity under the present terms and conditions of the current nationwide permit.
If you have any questions regarding this nationwide permit verification, please contact
Mr. John Ferrise at the letterhead address or telephone (503) 808-4391.
Sincerely,
�
l�' - ���il���—
al orda
Acti g Chief, Regulatory Branch
Enclosures
Copy Furnished:
Oregon Department of State Lands (Louise Bos - DSL NO: 33986)
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Regulatory(Robert Rose)
. ' �
_ 6'� � `aL�Enr - I �!-� =�� _ .
� �-_ � � �-� �
�= r, ,�''� � � ��
t ,
`�. Stw�urt �r�� �^'_ y
'S^1L . . . ������, �t�_ . ��.•-.• �� SYYMUClNOMAM
_ _ . , . �r.�,�— ,�4 y� ��ir ..
,�' g � - ---.`'�.' �y�`� � �. . .
. _ � ` :,� Q� . � . _.. � �x
r ,,�- SITE LOCATION f:_
SWHRO I�H.�.� . r'k,-i �. fi�� . ,� . . .� .- ._'fs�.--
/�� �
}2- �tiT ;T''�-`�( r�'j��
. . ..N . -.. r��.-� :� 'i .�-,` � J: � `,.
. � r . _ � -_ � t � f . -- .�� .
�3'' d.�. �J _�_1 i � t( . �
� �✓''-.t� , �Cf'�� �� . . '.� ,��G> i f
r i y F . �l
���J Z
� �^ �'"� N- .. .. � f- -� . ~ � , �m��
'_,
r��-f � ry ,_� Uj r� . �.�..� .. {�-: *
l ' 'l. _ . ��?.
. � � `: '-�,' � N�pr
_ _ �. . � `"- ��,�' � . .�7I7
"r. . . � . �\�i 2� � . .
. R"^i � . F . ~ `� ^{�� ' _J ,._
� � . ��_ -�'.—� . fr: � ��.. . .
L4CATOR MAP
�1= �
.Y..- - .:��
���
a �-
-� -- ���-���--�.
�
� `� � -i-
� -� ---- �,
�
r .-�
c ` �-� r _
o .-�-� --
� .�1 '�� ��: � � � t
� ' _� L —_. r� k .
� t �
� j � `c
� . , . � S ITE --�- } �-
� s ` � �=.�- �
. � � �
o �, � � f-% , �
� + � ',---!- ; - .�.��
o t '-'`�' �� ���=��_
� ' � 1.-�. �_^
: � ? �. �
m . - -
n. .
= VICINITY MAP
i Corps File No. 200500147
�
� �g� �� �+�� PRO�ECT LOCATION ���s/o�
� ,,, PRO.�CT: BEAVERTON HONDA
,� �� ��+� 10685 SW GREENBURG RD SHEET N0.
3303 87ih A�us
� �� P,ry«� oR 9� TIGARD OREGON �
� F���� COE/DSI. PERMIT APPUCAl10N �
ii
Enc�c�sure 1
• ' j
s-`' •3 Y 'a� _ �r Y•
ex � � .� i . �..
� � K4���P�'���i '� � �°A `N (. .. ' ���.:.Y" � ,� I
.
��:,��#� �� � �,�.'.' A` �2'�� r F�. �'i:o�`i� � �a�� +`�' ; �_ �.. '
• � �. ,' �."�'- a �� ��_
, >.�. �,
� � c a
7 ' g "K �`'. �'�;.9 .��
f a:,-� '��¢ ��.
� �
`�� f�A�x MA � �,k• `�" �����j'� a<� �
�
�'yT�'� � .' ��b�. °f�"��a
� � {.
� .- t t ^`F' c�� .P � �' � � _
��'� �.g a.J" � .� S��fr'S��"� .�Se e'
n 6� &�_ ����� �`3 �`"�p� y1" _
� „� ' � `R9 !' 4���A �" '4'� ~4t r _ . ra�. ��
1 _ �3:� � ai�p� }
I� ��� a�' �� � ��
�" b� t
. ' �� �Y�: - ,� "' ,��' i� �'
��t� #r� �,� °�� 3
�� �� � �. r � �i��� �, �` �
.s.,' t�� e a�' � � -�a�� �` �' ��� P �� �
t :�.. a � � �:-
v'�_�q�a W�. :°y"a$Li'�� � . .: .^� .
+�^
� � 9 a �. ' � � k�t �MmR :,�.1 ��
, � � �' 3�.' �F �s^ � �P � �
y A
i�� 'P- �' S,�'pg �Y�� �. '�� � Y
� #qi,'
�� �'�.�� g JF` ' � .� �' � �"` .
�;� �+:. . iir��,, �� �+ c�Y 3 g ��� .,�� �� �..
i _k ,�w�? '4
� � .���� � � � �� �� �� ��� . �� � ����
�� � g� �� �� � ��
�`" ��� �w�'��"'�. ��,a� � � ;,t ��' 2
� � � � :l. a����
� �� ��. � � � � �� a r� �� �
.
' '" 4 ... 1. � �. . d "�
f�� �t � . ` � . . 6 «.�,,. ..� � .
- [� �,.a . ' g�' �' . ��-� p��'
a. � ���
�� � � , � � � ��� �_, �� �� � �
�� � � � �� � � �� ���,�
�+ �� :�a . � ,; � � ��;��;� �, �
� f _ �; .�,s���;.��
it:� :� g ,�: � �, �
,`��_..; � � � . Z ti
�yj�_ � Cy ,
� iPk.s '�,.. "�'• ,i�3 e. N.]�Ndt�tV � �a -{,�._... �_ �I .+' , .
.:i:�:. _- w'w[ -.-...._ __ �
�
„ - III��' � . �''g,�`s�5��'`'
,��._ .. � _.._�— ,�,f� )P��vi�„e t k "t°�+ �
c
� , j. �q�}; � `� � �L{�' ��3
�
. .g,J. G¥W« t'�-Q �` .� ��4�'�ka�� ,�� � �
_dy�F ' �A:° �,, i� '� �r� ; � i'� ;�f �.`, a.
� � � � �� �� � �.
3 � $, ���'�� � • ��.
� d r�i� � � �
U � ° ,ta��$� ..( '��"�, s �.�: .
y Y �� sa.. .�R .�� ,�{ i.ti -�'�: r' � -�-.� & b a� y 4'
E y�,� �, ���� � � �
� �_� � � �
� `� � � --
c � '-��. `.�,�'' Y� � ; � � � `�
_� �
L ����*�°c�k` ��.s.r �� '�� ��.. .���. � �x���� � ��. ,,'
�� .�. ,�' ..�_ �_.
� - � ,�r } � ��� ,r�,- �°u. � _ �
O ��t Y `�` �
� dF a �, �:�, � � �' � w`t s
..p� t �Y k' ? '�y
� x� ''��I' p `�l �. �E �'4 � - h3
d ��6 � rr^� i't l�t ' ������
/ g T . �� ' �� � �� L`i� .� c
� 3� �� x a Y $ S p g _ .. .
/ � . #' � ��� `7 •t� � �'" .. . � � _ �_ g ' - .
� �,�� '~ � � 4�`� � � � ���`�r� � __
� � ���� � �
° �a;; E �; � �s
. , , ,•
C . =.g�. � ` � �z'v�
.r •� ��� �� A � y��` .�. ' t �� � :��q � �,
C rr�'�'�-,- � �.',r 'A , �.�� ' ` � �
p �`'.� r, ��y i«`a�s^.,.,.•-.`."-. .. ♦ �,�;�L ,�,a�.�v"�� * �' �
';s `" n . . : .
+� r � .., „� .�e . � ;�, , �_�$� .
L . ,� . . �� �y � ..�
: .
� . �,�, , 4 � �`. (� '�«... :°•..w'F .'t.Y �� _...a.-w..
� � �
� _ - ���:�. ,." �
� �� ��� �'+�. �� q�?.f 4 �e„ "�''�" �"_i 2 � �. .
�1 Y. a' � .�'s '�lt � __" $«� ,�. g
� � �fr � �: , ,� r, � �,. �, r'.
t , � �:,�.� '�:�, s. • ��` ,y�,'�R � ,� �
c � �"�`d �, � �'�`�`��,� `°� � �'{ ,'� � }-"'` . ��
� ���#�� :��'y,,.�` � � � � �k��..��`��'���„� �' ( � ,►� s File No. 200500107 ��-
.
� �:. .,.� «� x , < ,�' : �. � : a ,� �
�.- .,.� _ �� �sr� � ,� --�� -
" . � � � . �� � ST�UDY A�REA PLAN °A�E:� �� .�
�o FIOWIf1g 80�IOR8 �;�: �'�: 10/18/05
N ��, PR0,IECT. BEAVERTON HONDA
,� Flowing Solutions 1 Q685 SW GREENBURG RD
� 3305 SW 87th Avenue SHEET N0.
ai t� PatJand, ott s�ns TIGARD, OREGDN
j Phone (503) 297-6331 2�7
� Fax (5d3) 297-5053 COE/DSL PERMIT APPLICATION
} I L
{'i . . j� �: . i _ .
f
-� � � � 1 '• '� m...»` .
� �
. Sb�lALLEN . ; � � �. -;,�.�_ ��.. � .
-- .._. . � .>- .,
l - -:- ; �, �. _.
_ � }
� , � '
�- � � � E.
,; � , I
�•- ._--`� �
�7 SV1 CcNM , �.. ...; 'r'{ �F , I ,_.
� �,
�- ' ; I
SW f-�RT�� ���� �-�i�. . �SW MULTNO f�1AN
f r,� � � ;�----�--
� � �t `a�� '��
_ ol
, �������- r�� S I TE LOCATI4 N r�,t�
�SW BRO Kl.�a,N . � _ �.
.. .. . . _ . S(��:
:• Cn S{
�'-- z.t7�s��,`��y�{
�
r( �- � ���
�� ��m � �y} � - � �� �
�j _ � �� i, i �.� ^� ��
�_� � ; �� �� i ,� � �� -"T ,'
,
�� �
- N � �
-~;F N `� `� ��� -- *
3 � ' �'rn-
� ��'
�
� � � �'I -_ t� a� ��
_ `���� ��r}� � �'��
,
I
._ � —
��� �����-- � �I ' �
� �'f'�_ �
LOCATOR MAP
� ��,� .���,
:� b'r:iS�t�::Y�;� n,� k��y��.
� 7 .ji (
� _� �'��#�t� r 4`E
� � �
y �� � �;r�,,�
E ��� 1 '-�----
�, �,, l
a ��'�� �
�° - - -_ . ?�'°'�
c ,` - , ��'���s �,� �,� �
t �.ti � _ - ��t—_._,' ���3i'�"� 3e�j-. :a:v'-
oc k L.Y y _; ��f.-_ �' ��.,.
.., � -----� �',�
� � c:� --
o -
d �"�: � --L
% '1 i I
% '- - M'���' '.� �
� .�'{ � SITE � �- - � �� � __
� .,
� �
� — ��� i � �_a .� -
o � �ti� �__ � —�� -- � � _, —
� , � ;
,
... , .
� � ; i 1 � � � � � .
� � , .�-_- � -- 1-� � } =r.� ��-
r- ,
� _ � ',< <--� - ����,����� _�� r � .�
� �--� - �- � � � - �_� � _
a�i "_ �!��.� � �� , � , ¢, � � ----�`_7—
� � _
� -
L
� VICINITY MAP
� Corps File No. 200500107
N
r-�
.o flpyy�gp��g s"EET r�nE: pR0]ECT LOCATION DATE:
10 18 05
a `� PROJECT: BEAVERTQN HONDA �
,� Flowinq Solutians
�� 3305 SW 67th Avenue 10685 SW GREENBURG RD SHEET N0.
v�i �� PorUand aR 97225 TIGARD, OREGON /
j Phone (503) 297-6331 � 7
� Faz (503} 297-6053 COE�DSL PERMIT APPLIGATION
Enc�c��ure �,
- i
e:�fe\fsproJects\lanphere\beavertonhonda\cad\beavertonhondapermitdwg �
, ■ , �. �'.� k �'tnr�.�`F s x_ r' -} '�,t 1. .�...^ �,.� ti 4 � . �, .✓�'r'_.' .
..:,1. �.n'G�"� � 1 � '!� Y � X. r � L ��1 � ir/ W:��
{ � F� K S� �,.Y�d,�, p u i y(��4 a ��i-�'.d x' r Pt x�� al,y. '
� � � �� » .,,t'�.f'� .�i'ym � -�PL� �.. ��N �'�t�. . �„t'�.nr*L:Si��� �.•r�SU.^ . �_, �
� � .. ...... .. �.... . � . . �l� ''�r''t ,� '�S �i,�y t:4'�r M� �.�T�(/� �e1 i i Y a .. +?'r d.�gF}!r•'� ' '.l_�~�'.r'��,
� "7 a t�- ^C f i'4f s � 4 y .e,Y�
� . . . , � d� } y� �,� '��.. x't t r A '°7�Y i'"�' a .c �+'tir" �`•.M1n .�
�i �... ..._..��. . � .s .c� �,+u. . � s.Kes � ri�..fi�.x si ..,...v"� ., u
O � ::� � "10Y �. .'y�< • • �nj+'i .�n � '�"f+`�AF'ti e �* r � -!�t� �.' .. �� .. �
r` :',�s�'� J
� %, .. � �� �� Y '�Y`4`'� `'.r L'Tt�dl�� ;�,.}f �r Ji: - � „ � � ,;t
4 1 s t �S a--i� '/ � �.�.' ��. yy k . ���• .
� f�! ��� i Fp��r��� _'°.�,�-�F.�p.� F {r��xt x,x' " _ •�' .:�eR. +r' I � �'} f���
� �� tll ,+/ � �� �, ° �, 1d"h; 1 N�- ��k� ~ .. �,y . �,1„n.. � ` }� �.,.�`•
p�.� I+ , • i a
1 �^ '*. 4 `•- ; *`F ,• _ w .-K . ..n-^"', �y t;�' �.'3
(� �� 6 � �' t w'J'.
� N G�W �' �� w�,��'�)� 'P F '��y. � � }�t � 4.
V� J „�� , ,r� � ; ��J. �t`t
�► ����� '` , ��{,I�RY' ) �� .. � .e ��1 `` �
d �� .'� �1 ��, .tF � �' t%`�" �. y t
�� • . �: r , - j_��,{,�,,�.K.
� 'yhi�[� ,�1F �l��, �. T. �� f„„' To'r'" �.nr^'
i�t � �S �' 3�j�,� �u •��,��� .�n•"�"/^.
� VI +�`� �_ �._ ..�_.�A J ri G f Z'- P �t �� �'�'"`�. ."'r�
.` s�ta► ��, �, x.,.•,4fi pt � '!' ��+nr"'r �
�1 = Npp4y:1[i � � '`h ti'� :1:".. . � X..�"..`i'�'"� .
QC. Irn�I �� ' ��, �Mi �w's J�_�� �
1'1 —I . � ; ; �r � �' '�.� : •� ����t�f{ ... gYy !�
� ,y,.� 1.�°�i rr � :q .,� `' � � .!'t� �'r^�''�~�.;`� '• �..rr:
� � '' ^ �x j�- �.. t r�: .��`�". .
�"% �. 1
O � i ��;x.w'�� �i � 4 .��.��r ♦ � ��"`.�a-'�'�..�
.
.
m � oo ' • . • , �'r _ c, , •,.y''-
. ,,,,�
Qm • M, �y�)� .�t ' , ..��•�_' .. .,.. . � .�7��F � �• :y.•
'Y ♦ • • 4
v -�-.
� D�a ;, `}s. . - •�e ;� 'CA�iA��"` � "-;� "-_-� ,'�.�� ".�'�M.�`.. r 8 �:r..�.,...
Oo .r� ., ... . , r -
� '-�U1S('JT'�7 r��r N �t�/�`J,��� }•.r�f.'_`ar?: � . +, at a.r�� .. f l�,., � - r'� �;�.�..T,:i
� v(n� `w^"� �p �'���"'�� �'y . � � r' ��{f.�i�.4� 1l ey,'K��- �1 f � �ti �'� J�� ;A �� �
m ��O � .., � �'�} `y^;�' �,.. �r;'� 'j��"�` -,���°� 4Y_ ...�' .�,�� '�f. .d��a ,f- ����t'-"�. 1A! ...
�7 ('�� � 1.. `.R. �b, '. . � ��v s � r. � r S + �.• _� Jt�, . . � a - - - .
� �^�_ � , I�� ,')� �: ... ..; 1 � r�rF A j t _J w r �a"�x �''� F°', r�rv'.�'y f"..yn Je�.t ^ '�.t� .
>-�-'.
—� ��Z � 4 �� �v �� l,�, °,�G--.--.•� t k` �` R�y+4 �� . d 'r .^.'•� ^ .� "_. i .
�rseY'r' .�-+-r"�
D Z �,� ��. �� • � ,� ,�,^ .' � p 1�w r ; . 3 s I-d�� �k l . .`.
� �p � r Y � 't� ��1:�; �.i.. J�'��l°t. r �'� �� `Y .:� �.�' � . ,,.M .
�y, Y� ,�^y � �.4 . �, � . s'.y � � .� .� . 1 � � ���
C �D •, '�- .; 4�,` �, r � k i „i' r, r° 1 s, 4 _���• , � -w--�"�^'!�.
C� G7 • '� �'�.,i w, w '����{rR a'vt7 ��$A� + � i�Y� y� ,tia'��~�� ,�1'.:• -,�.�',,, ,"m ';�
D , "��' �. ,r�° /' =ti"�" ` M° ,�'� - �' .
rrv �,/ � .i � � vwd�e
� ."� �— ��<r �"�� � �k�jyr� � �' � �� ,� �/ a r` l+wR,r+ ',S`"'tt� '�eF:n--T'-•--c-
0 � ��' �� •,s�, .� ,��F°,ityEN W�„'���Idti� •� •.r JJ �ry�c� q n �"•�, iff`�'_nf J�'r .�t <P n��• '
• MDA�t `a ` "�� L r�s. i * ,a ,� t f., �o x �y�y r w � �._"� � . ��';
r ' r
�
Z O '>' . .'r .4 :. Y � .... ;?+,�''°� � ti� ��� �I k�`�^ .'_`. � ���i�"d :
.�. J4 FM��d�� � _ / ..y;..;,w.,�...,, ,��.�s.,,,...
� �� ' i • - }L�J-.a '4 z� t'^`L a? t, p ]� �yT,�,;� ,` � ,., � +" .,.
�.)� � •t 7$� ie.nl{'R��u ,/ ,¢ , '; ,�1�.. �.Y;M. . � •.�7`�,��e...',� I . � ..
� � �C� ;�ti l��,�i�({,t. d Y�V�Si.^ � � �! y "l° � b�1�� � � p +rL.�� �
VI �.. I . .. .S' �y�!K,, t NL w„ ,� !�.+'J yi'A.. ,�:,� +JL..f�-O�L..-4 y..�ZL' �1'�y.r.�C ,
�i •�±i� ��r,�� ti.:. .{ A n:9�t. ...r i��r. � y� y�h � e i. w e'-
'� � �' ,af � l�,{aR'..ri j •. �i':':• `���i � �Y�Y+a
� ��' `�N �, � ♦�,,- �►. .�� � n..,"x�...,. r_;�.d�.., `�,,�
. A ��� �` ',`, �, , ��.,.�^Y ..
�r R r`*r�r: . .rt,ti; { �r'''r ° ' `'�k y�r'x-¢��n,�s.r� `7` .�?., Y •' -
O DY�1I �7 ��`•� ^, `" *� � �•�` � 1 C� � :.; . T M1 r� ..-. � �•
h1 t a�":• � ��" , K.��-t ' •) ,�+ ' +r
t. � , w ' �" � S{
lJ � � •• "r'�Yj;<� � �' IL ' t ,rt�.is�.'�'"' e� a..a..�+ w�) 4����� r1�� _ a+p�-•-
Q �;' '`h .,�' � �r„ 4a �rY.'M`TM ? H � .��.,r k f,. y.� �,^e° .'�.
Q �!j, ��;, (� �_ E : l i'{ y�Y ��..°4 ... y� 6 .�A�
� . ! :� , � � . � _.� a �
O �y� k, � ' i r �, r:"�,�r-,':-"� -«-r:; ., �a
O ,J± �f 'y' . I1� f,A� '.y`� u� �M�II�' \ rr �(� .
� � i�
J � '�� v� �v '� �� � :ry,, T ,�. � ° [ z'X-�a a ;t� � - �r 7 -
•�,� � ''. '"��� 8.';; Q ` k .� C •, x �. �. _� � ,,�. 9,�'
�/ �., �'`� ��"„� ..+.�.nr tff "" t• C 4 ��tl a t K d. ?:
� / 1��� .s� ��.?'r '+ tT4 � ���1.' .�.. .,I '.,. � f .
� ,� D �� , �',i � .� � � [�r.}���� 8 : � �r� � y''..Y. i K..�.i � �=_. � ������ �
r� { �� � � _ a .
w � � ,r� (�'� , � f �b �������': * $ , gx f ^� f ���a � �,d` s � � z�'� ` �',.�� ��`*�; �
00 �� R 4r � !`r � �' e�' '-�' �• �+ � • : �Y., �
� � ��� � ��- . Ic•n 'r u s , Y � ,,.�.�`j. �
4
O __,.. .__� ' y
Z - � �- �, Q ,, � a �-� '" ��
��• ' .t -.. y-n � � ..., � -+1� !s G: �, �._:_�:�.� 'R�.�
' (�fl j3 � =a ;:,,, _ _ �,.'_. . . k ,r.
� I
, . � - I
�.. �.�
���°� C .
y�'��/ •
,d"'�
� �
� � ��
�' }'
� / �
�� I:
i� ��
t� (�
���i
� �� �� O
� ��'��I;''`i�� d
� I�I��,,� i
J ;��I�� �
��� ��' n �.
. ��;'�, �
ii �
� —
� ,,;,� �
. �� 3
;i;�,
��,�� �
,
I f;''
3
� a�
�ii;� Z
DITCH TO BE PIPED �` �'�F
;���� °�'
,d��) �
.,, �YO'ELL`�iNKY � �`` �
.....- _"___ ., ,
-��it, �
. - - ' - ��'E�' V
. . _ � '�
- -ro1 �
—
3 g _ 1 '
.� • U
E +��+
�
°' �' �3
a
0
o . (tj
L N �+
�
o _ �
> . � F" .
° � O u
°' J �a
% � —
� Q
a ' �
� -
0
'�'- oG
�
o -
s
� -
° � -- —
� - , -
> o '
� - - �
.� ,. ,, ..
/ � . . . AL'ifL iT14i0i ' r~w
s " i
a �
c j ��
r r.s
� � ' Corps File No. 200500107
.�
.o �W� �� SHEET TITLE: OVERALL SITE DATE:
a �� PROJECT: BEAVERTON HONDA
10/18/05
� Flowing Sdutions 10685 SW GREENBURG RD
t 33Q5 SW 87th Avenue SHEET N0.
a�i �� Portland, oR s�225 TIGARD OREGON
j Phone (503} 297-6331 4/7
� Fox (5Q3} 297-6053 COE/DSL PERMIT APPLICATION
. •
1S 1 35�8 1S 1 35�BB
3� � i 1� �� l ! � 9 i q ' (
_ �fi� `,�.�' :1 �'�S + t" � a'� �'�� .� � ��� .�. ��� �' XS.���l1 � �' � °� s ��� '`�*�
. `� � � i. t�\ � 1 ���t E �� . � � �. �,,� ' �.�i �'
�� } ` i.� ' f f 7 ' '.-�
�� ,� t t ,.� t��;t --_
� � ,__ ; �'� ; ' fi � t � •,�4,� �'.� � ` --�� -
� ��-��. ' ` �" rt � � ~ �qi � : � � ��
_
� ..�
�, = s +a�R'^. e _ � ±.. ,
�.
.
• � ..:... , .
� . � y �. Si � ,� `�"4.T +�.:.. .s�....._-��..�_�-.e,,,,,� 1 _._._.
# �� �. �
,r � ,,.,: � , ,, , , �- ,< -,�w �
� �t 8 '\ �' "YpC^' ,,�•.i.��t..� �+ : ��'�+� - �er �� �,�:
�� ��"�y� ��� �, :.'�.4 � Ml[+�� "�y"' }}}'c-r�. -
� -`� . �s = y , � i, .(� �� _ .s., �.•r
.. '�.� . ,.�' `.. �. 4"� 7tfA8/�Mi'TOp IbIA/T7 0�f
� � .... �� � ��� . �N'
_ t4 w� {: tt r. `r`L� wwrr�a�w�[}cr���fM'vy.
.. .-,-,-, ,_ eau[ . es�
._�- '� � � + �� #� � _ .. ._ .�. . .
Y
a -�� ��� L � .� s
�-" '- � t '��, ��"'.''w^:.' �� ':*.� '�, -� 3 � € ��x t� � *. � '.S ii 31�'.lt L'Y�>I M b..
. .� ` .. � y■ � N� .. � ._
� . .. \ . . . �,::F f " T i
`R �[ : . .._.._ ..... � � ,�„s t .�• g y !� �y� , � T
, � . #F:�s � �� � s��.
_. �_.._._._......_v_.. , . ( j=�
._.....-:..... .,.. -».., � .l ' S '�'t � : } i ��'!�C �lh » F'd ;M d[ 'f
.���-� �. i : _�.. ��.4 `.`% a. � �t. �r � .I � Rw�. � ,.fi ri,re re a �'1� :} ri�
� �� Z - �� ! . �!'. `�, .�i �
.
:p . .'y. : ..� ' �i . . � i ,. ` .« v '� T],EI 3 D .y �I�.
:.T �•.. �� . *... .......r.......��,�...:..,: � �.... y-' '�.� ���SA, '�h { �[ �J� . .
�, '
yW_ �- f�} $ l0'T a 3'�� G M��.
.�' ' . � ., m4�kII'R- �R yl�'..� . �d��'y�
,.M . "��...` .M1'.:'T°`T^�'�� N i R Y ]a � 4 lr�
> L�.• p� "y Y�0'a . � �' ��A.,...5_�.,{.{. �. f:
. �. � _ w� � 4 � �rc„ k / ' �, . tG1�RIqItM�R�Wf�fOT1lR/Qf[.Q
(,,�''�( R p
�4J� � �4�� iM11tp��.K
�\ `�k `�'� ��` ��� R}s's �.• 'b,- �, � Y G� N _ �.,
� � �
..�1 �� y"��i ��' � t k' .�'�
ar ;. ; ��. � �� � �`��T.(� lC ; l4 M. �, KI t
Y
♦ ,
.; > .. . ���:7d ',�! K � �� � ``�
, ,, '�; s�c rrarr�s -�
�.' ,�. � � , �f , �, �, u a. �
',"e� �\ � �x �� rk ., t'.""�'.'.`�`�� .. _~"_�_..�_�,„� e e
- ac `�ra .:e � as
��" . �.�r Y Y' :� �\_ _...__�_._..__...�___..�
�}a �y .� �..�....,.,..�,...,� �� T.f } � s �I
.�.�' l. � ;' � :�, �
�� � � �� a;�y � � .
�✓ � _1....� � � q �
<
x
� .�.� ; ��:�,� � . � �,p ��, �, � � � ` x 'r:
�x �, �`lYi,'.. �.. . ''.....re. _ ........ ............... k's, 1��� xYf ✓ d
4
,_ '�` � � � _v,�
_ a. :
� , <�
�' �" ���"� ' ?� �y '= 9 a.._.:; ..�„� ,� �� -� �-t�.
, __.__.
`�x�f' � ° : .4. "� � . . �� --»...�v......_ .�-.. .. . �� -�+..�Q'F(�*��
, � �.. � 1, a '4 r ... ��
3.�„ 'd}
�
�, '� �} �:(�� � 1� ttia`ra,tixe �,.,-.,.x�a,t9w
� � !� . Ff��.q V \ 4t1.'iACiY.EB
� `" ����.: �`4�" � '° rr�. �n �, ra �av
: .� t�: � � �£� '°i�? � fu`s� Hkn �
'4` '� � .. rr & ��' ,��3f � � . . . � �+ ' k�...�.�,`��»-��.. w
.
;* �e'� � i_ `� 'f�;�*t
. .
w.z F+
� `��' . . , . . � . .�, � .,
s ;
'.. . _ , :> �. n�'c �. , k.. .''' �;':`3. �. �_-•� ,�-:,wd,wRe.,�.,..}u ....Q �z� w��
,. r......:�,�a .... � .
�' � 1. 'e��5B8 1�1��
3
U
�
•� 2���+ ` 1�J1, `< 1 J� `Y� �}' `)y
o. ` �� •` �'� �` ``\;
o �' } ` ,` �� e � �> � �, * < ,��
� �� .4— < ;<� < �:� �.�` we�a�ow � ^
0 0• r'^ � , ass.e ,, `; ,� ',t
� '�.. .,�Ob.G7 1 � ~ Y . �` . ••—� ''��_
C n.ee cH I 13zet \ —
� NBY-49W � \�
> I `\
O ` I �.
� S � I u'�.
/ (n' ��\
v �\
� �� sao �� �ofl � � ��
� 25' �� 1.34 AC I ry 218 AC �� 2��
O � � I�°z \
.\
t �
O � `�
� �
� I f �
> I
6
� �+exr 3ooato�2et�- I
� FMET1T7001�73E4 Y � j 370.0Y
� � . 1---r-�194�f' T M1 BSS.61 06YD9 .__ �
� �� �87.bQ, �-- —�- -r- „��
Q , . , _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .'�°. . , , . , . . . . . I:� ,�� .6f. ,-ZT,64.83, , , ,
/
� Corps File No. 200500107 1 S 1
�
.�
� SHEET TITLE: TAX MAP DATE:
° ������ 10 18 05
Q �, PROJECT: BEAVERTON HONDA � �
� f! Flow�n9 soiutions 10685 SW GREENBURG RD
� t J 3305 SW 67th Avenue SHEET N0.
j �` P one(50�297?J31 TIGARD OREGON 3/7
� Fax (503) 297-6053 COE/DSL PERMIT APPLICATEON
Enclosure �
. - i l
—_-r Z--� � ;I�.i: �.,
� / '�O.O�,.er
c �p �p / �rFs
�,•_� / Z9o�f
. �°� / Q�Qe
�PG�/ ,5t��9
:,y,, �o Ze�x
;�==. y� �QS�
,.
�
'�`��
:
�
C�r�nect , �
� � �
exist � M
O '�. ali ��°� N �
o ,,,�
'� � :; �' �� � {L
, �'�= �a'�' n 11 J
�.����f .:� `Q Q
� � �_ �p�� 0�0 � 3
P GJ ll a �
-_-�� ,`
� � • EXISTING � Z . Q �
" ' PAVING Q
,, 0 o n.�
'� W J � �
i °•, N
. . S��r�war c~n m i O
.. . er/�joM,_+ =
�' �,.:.. • , --.r.�^ � J
�� ' � � - �� � a
•� � ' ° ' �' ' � ' 1-
,; � ' ,w
�; '� ' ' ' ♦ Y/
� � • 1 � • .•T . ♦ �
� �� . `� � ° 'r p' . � � I M
� '�� ' ' �RdPOSE� , tor m ot I,
€ • . �i�,y o~C
° �' ' ' � °� PA�NG � _ � ate
� �� , ' ' ' - � � r����'v►�,_ J
�. .
_ �� � . :
R • • 4'• .r
,°� ?1, ,,p' ,� • . ���,--. �
C �r�, . • . .o ' v �v: • � ' U
� � � �. • �. I . s� ' e. 9 . �p ,
� T
� e
m %1�� "r. ` • v'' 'v ' i+ ` •' ,r j�' _� ♦
� J;'t• . , ` � 1' •p r O • � �'`^+ '+ �
� , � • • • � .
0 '``` ��.♦ . � . r. r � ,
0 �' •� �r v • � y� � �� � �. � 9 � O� ��'
o •�( , - ,���_.,.�-- ter F�o
t
�
0
m - -
Ext�nd Pi �/Backfill Ditch ' ' � �
m In li trap � p �`x , �
�
ba , ~ t
m cat ' X a#
m`' IoW= oi ts; � '`
-
t .-.
`� con to �°,
� '
� exi n system Corps File No. 240500107 �
.� sH�r n-n.F: P DATE:
° � � PROJECT: BEAVERTON HONDA 10/18/d5
� �f� ���� 10685 SW GREENBURG RO SHEET NO.
� �� a«��a, oa s�22s GAR R N
� �°"' « 297�� COE/DSL PERMIT APPUCATION 5��
� Fox (S03) 297-6053
Fnr.ln���re 1
, � � ,
CrossSection-1
,:'� ___.__ �.,,� g��_—�ts�tt�--- 120,0_�---- € __.� � �120.0
� � �
_� � �� Ditch �� � �
x 1 to be 110,0�------�-�----�-� �i 10,0
; � j o F c� �� �
�
; Piped ; ����` � ;
��:. � � = f ;
x � � i000�.._�.f--�f_ __ _���__.�ioo,o
�
c��s�� Ec= -i = � i � HW=
� ' �� �= '� ( �
90,Oo--------�..�,.�.���_�-�----------�90,0
�x � �� �H�/ ° i � �
� V O�0"'i"i'.ii.•i_.i"'i ti"�"`"Y�'fi"'i i�"ii't}"''"f'i'i f 1 i"i'i"`�f'�'lw1 1"'i'1"Y"i"i'11"V O�O
0
�
� x:
x
!�t
X i0
In
tN
t`a� ;:,' F �I? .- .
7'
�"' I IV
iI tt
��-
�;�
,o
;�
�N
X i
3 �
�
�
E �, .;f
a� +'�4 =*� _
� CROSSSEC �, ;-Z
o CrossSection-2
s
� 120,0x---_-,,,,,,,.,_,____�€�_.___..�-�.�-. 120,0
0
� ��
' � j
� ,O iX � �
( 'f
i ���y�� D�°°�; 110.OY: 110,0
� � � � �
i '" �i � i�..D4� i
� f. ����.� 100,0�..--------° � _--- -----�--�---�100,0
c � � � ���� i �
� - ; ,��� F-I�,,��
� > � i
; .� 90.OY -- �90,0
1] f-4 E'_;`"__\` . o � .
�` % ..X :.��� _�_Mx... �.,�� �'r r � y�'ri r'�
�� 80 0 �r�-:..; ���o-�a � � .r�o-:—�r' �=80,0
r
Q
c
a
N Corps File No. 200500107
�
� SHEET TITLE: SECTIONS — OHW DATE:
.o �� �p� 10 18 05
N ��, PROJECT: BEAVERTON HONDA � �
,� Flawing SoEutions 1Q685 SW GREENBURG RD
/ i 3305 SW 87th Avenue SHEET NO.
m j Portfand, ott s�225 TfGARD �REGON /
j Pn�,e {so�) zs7-sssi 6 7
� Fax (503) 297-6053 COE/DSL PERMIT APPLICAl10N
. � �- f
- —�--�Z—� ...'' j i' � ,
0 70 10 !l? j� �"Q�f F�
/��',L �OrF
�,•-� /� �, 90`f ,� �
� Po !"� e
2 �
�o� Q�'P
o��i� y��sti`�9 ,
tr__ t��(�j 5`Ze�
�;:�\;: �F� / vQ
,� ,, � ,a� ° � il �
Cqrinect�o-��.
� , �
� . ....� �
existi�ng �; y� �„ M
ODfST: ry ,tfall �° � �;
,' _�—\;�:=��� ,�.Q't� O ��"'i w
; "� �=-:��' ��F,�� �a �,, n � ..�
�> 1--, ,'{\�` t� Oj W ' I Q
� `�1 �O � � '` j ; �
;,,; Q" G� II Q �; i : �
��� �� Q � � ; ; _
;-�. ..�; � �', EXISTING , � Z � � V
�%+ T�`�`' > <' PAVING Q � o �
�t % � ' � �
W � �
�' ' ° - � StOr�� N 7 ` ' 1 Z
�
� %r --, '� a�er F'o v� m I, ; ' i ; p
l p - 4`� r V� !' � I Q
� " p � ,,--•,y-.�"-^�` ;'" i � Ft J
',� . , '��` ° : � ! ! ` I� Q
'�:,:��k . a ° - ' ' '� j� � , � l H
==` `=_. . � �A
..\��,,� > ;:
� �.___;.,� _ > > , , . . . . . t ' ' Z
� �yf. 'T�� . . . ' Y. , �s , � 6 `� � 20 f4 ,, I I F�1
E �� � PROPOSED ;tqr� � F-
°' '�,' "` n PA�/ING . ' wate � W
a ��:i�• ,, �,
o _� . ; ,_ , . > �
v - ` �/p _ �
C '-�';% ��v N `r � k . v - ' . n� � �,✓-_..�,., � � �� �{ /��
+�+ _\��� ,��',�-s o ' y � �^' ' 7 ��� y ➢ � r9 �� � V
o -;�'`` �' ' � A > � fI
� �'�, .�• ' . y� va P .' • .a --\\ !
% ; .-�� Y • d f, °� . _ �,I� ,2+ �'
o i���, �.� os 9 . f ,. . •> - � ,� �
/ .;�-'� � o� : � , or�� � �
� .'x �� . ,� � r : , , � . a � I
• ° ° `x � ..:__, ter ;
� ,,.._
L � �+ '�/�./�,_.�_,�• °_��..�.'_.i..��,.../�,_/�--".� .._ - '},,�
/ , •• �� ,40'ELZ M.Zb�S0e505 / �'� �
c A _ _...
_. __ _
O ' ,
r
.-� j
� Ins ' II trap Ext�nd Pipe/Back�ll Ditch _ .% - ��i4�i E
� ,
% catc pa�i�n�� "' .y� ��;i`,
` � x .x x i��,
� '�W 0� �Sr ..�x . -
L �
Q } '%'�
Q C�n C� l. / • ,�O
� exis n system Corps File No. 200500107 � f
; SHEET TITLE: pROPOSED WORK °A�:
� �� � PROJECT: BEAVERTON HONDA 10/18/05
m f Flowin9 Solutions 10685 SW GREENBURG RD
� f 3305 SVY 87th Avenue SHEET NO.
v�i jt Portland, OR 97225 TIGARD OREGON
j Phone (503) 297-6331 5/7
� Fox (503) 297-6053 CQE/DSL PERMIT APPLICATION
�n�in���rE� i
� • j��
ROW
Vartr b Phaw
1. ' 2' 2 VatTn
' E.7aSTINC PAVE)AprT �
� < a- PROPOSED PAVEMENT
2 ��� � .
i � y
� --�; ^� � �-
E10571NG GRWN� i ' E--� � '—
�.i.
,�
i i-
, � -�(r
A_A r-4'ROUND ROdC/SdL
suRF�u�re.s•niiac
PROPOSED SWALE CROSS SECTION `"�F`�"�"
NTS
DETECTABLE WARNING TAPE
EXIST. A.C. --��,,, � ; 6" M�
�.._
t �
..,. .;.,. N
'r���o �'ep-D° '� .CO�J°•"4pib�p ;a�•�
_ .__...D_.�....___
24-27" CDF BACKFILL � �:�:;::;. ,,.';';_'•,F�^:`'
OR 3,000 PSI CONCRETE� ,� '
;�.
BEDDING -.-�— F
p �
CRUSHED R CK I 6" � 6" ;
���MIN. , MIN.�
� .�� 1 E
�Q�S:
o, 1. 12" PAVEMENT SECTION — 4" AC OVER 8" COMPACTED GRAVEL
3
v
�:
.�
�
a�
� x PIPE BEDDING �c BACKFI ��
� CXX N.T.S.
0
.�
`
a�
>
� S WALE PLANTING�
0 1, Seed soil/rock with sloughgrass, wildrye, r�annagrass
� 2. Apply biodegradable coir fabric
0 3, Plant pointed rush and slough sedge along fringe,
0 4, Locate 1 redtwig dogwood every 3ft each side of swale
� 5. Locate 1 pacif(c n(nebark every 6ft, each side of swale
�
� 6, Locate 1 nootka rose every 3ft each site, Mid-bank
! 7, Hand water during establishr�ent period,
�
�
L
n
c
a
� Corps File No. 200500107
�
,.
� SHEET T�TLE: DETAILS DATE:
o Fbwirlg 8oklt�on8
n � PROJECT: BEAVERTON HONDA 10/18/05
,� f Florinq Sdutlone 10685 SW GREENBURG RD
/n �f 3��SWO8�7t972 5nue TIGARD OREGON SHEET N0.
j Phone (563) 297-6331 � 7�]
� Fax (503) 297-6053 COE/DSL PERMIT APPLICATION
�nr.lnsu�'e- �
� Nationwide Permit General Conditions
(From the January 15, 2002 Federal Register,Vol. 67,No. 10)
l. Navigation
2. Proper Maintenance
3. Soil Erosion and Sediment Controls
4. Aquatic Life Movements
5. Equipment
� 6. Regional and Case-by-Case Conditions
7. Wild and Scenic Rivers
8. Tribal Rights
9. Water Quality
10. Coastal Zone Management
11. Endangered Species
12. Hisioric Properties
I3. Notification
14. Compliance Certification
15. Use of Multiple Nationwide Permits.
16. Water Supply Intakes
17. Shellfish Beds
18. Suitable Material
19. Mi,�igation
20. Spawning Areas
21. Management of Water Flows
22. Adverse Effects from Impoundments
23. Waterfowl Breeding Areas
24. Removal of Temporary Fills
25. Designated Critical Resource Waters
26. Fills Within 100-year Floodplains
27. Construction Period
Encl.3
1
� I�
C. Nationwide Permit General Conditions �
The following General Conditions must be followed in order for any authorization by an NWP to be valid:
1. NaviQation. No activity may cause more than a minimal adverse effect on navigation.
2. Proper Mair:tenaizce. Any structure or fill authorized shall be properly maintained,including maintenan�e to
ensure public safety.
3. Soil Erosion and Sediment Controls. Appropriate soil erosion and sediment controls must be used and
maintained in effective operating condition during construction,and all exposed soil and other fills,as well as any
work below the ordinary high water mark or high tide line,must be permanently s[abilized at the earliest practicable
date. Permittees are encouraged to perform work within waters of the United States during periods of low-flow or
no-flow.
4. �uatic Life Movements. No activity may substantially disrupt the necessary life-cycle movements of those
species of aquatic life indigenous to the waterbody, including those species that normally migrate through the area,
unless the activity's primary purpose is to impound water. Culverts placed in streams must be installed to rr.aintain
low flow conditions.
5. EJc uipment. Heavy equipment working in wetlands must be placed on mats,or other measures must be iaken to
minimize soil disturbance.
6. Re2ional and Case-By-Case Conditions. The activity must comply with any regional conditions that may have
been added by the Division Engineer(see 33 CFR 330.4(e)). The activity must comply with any regional conditions
that may have been added by the Division Engineer(see 33 CFR 330.4(e))and with any case specific conditions
added by the Corps or by the state or tribe in its Section 401 Water Quality Certification and Coastal Zone
Management Act consistency deternunation
7. Wil�i and Scenic Rivers. No activity may occur in a component of the National Wild and Scenic River System; or
in a river officially designated by Congress as a"study river"for possible inclusion in the system,while the river is
in an official study status;unless the appropriate Federal agency,with direct management responsibility for such
river,has determined in writing that the proposed activity will not adversely affect the Wild and Scenic River
designation,or study status. Information on Wild and Scenic Rivers may be obtained from the appropriate Federal
land management agency in the area(e.g.,National Park Service,U.S.Forest Service,Bureau of Land Managemeni,
U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service).
8. Ti•ibal Riehts. No activity or its operation may impair reserved tribal rights,including,but not limited to, '
reserved water rights and treaty fishing and hunting rights.
9. Water Qualitv. (a)In certain states and tribal lands an individua1401 Water Quality Certification must be
obtained or waived(See 33 CFR 330.4(c)).(b}For NWPs 12, 14, 17, 18,32,39,40,42,43,and 44,where the state
or tribal 401 certitication(either generically or individually) does not require or approve water quality management
measures,the permittee must provide water quality management measures that will ensure that the authorized work
does not result in more than minimal degradation of water quality(or the Coips determines thai compliance with
state or local standards,where applicable,will ensure no more than minimal adverse effect on water quality). An
important component of water quality management includes stormwater management that minimizes degradation of
the downstream aquatic system,including water quality(refer to General Condition 21 for stormwater management
requirements}. Another important component of water quality management is the establishment and maintenance of
vegetated buffers next to open waters, including streams(refer to General Condition 19 for vegetated buffer
requirements for the NWPs).
Tl�is condition is only applicable to projects that have the potential to affect water quality. While appropriate
measures must be taken, in most cases it is not necessary to conduct detailed studies to identify such measures or to
require monitoring.
2
10. Constal Zone Management. In certain states,an individual state coastal zone management consistency
concurrence must be obtained or waived(see 33 CFR Section 330.4(d)).
11. Endangered Species. (a)No activity is authoriZed under any NWP,which is likely to jeopardize the continued
existence of a threatened or endangered species,or a species proposed for such designarion,as identified under the
Federal Endangered Species Act(ESA),or which will destroy or adversely modify the critical habitat of such
species. Non-federal pernuttees shall notify the Distiict Engineer if any listed species or designated critical habitat
might be affected or is in the vicinity of the project,or is located in the designated critical habitat and shall not begin
work on the activity unti:notified by the District Engin�r that the requirements of ttce ESA have been sarisfied and
that the acrivity is authorized. For activities that may affect Federally-listed endangered or threatened species or
designated critical habitat,the notif:cation must include the na�(s)of the endangered or threatened species that
may be affected by the proposed work or that utilize the designated critical habitat that may be affected by the
proposed work As a result of formal or infonnal consultation with the FWS or NMFS the District Engineer may
add species-specific regional endangered species conditions to the NWPs.
(b)Authorization of an activity by a NWP does not authorize the"take"of a threatened or endangered species
as defined under the ESA. In the absence of separate authorization(e.g.,an ESA Section 10 Pennit,a Biological
Opinion with"incidental take"provisions,etc.)from the USFWS or the NMFS,both lethal and non-lethal"takes"of
protected species are in violation of the ESA. Infom�ation on the location of threatened and endangered species and
their critical habitat can be obtained directly from the offices of the USFWS and NMFS or their worid wide web
pages at http:/1www.fws.gov/r9endspp/endspp.html and http:/lwww.nmfs.noaa.gov/prof res/overview/es.htm
respectively.
12. Historic Properties. No activity which may affect historic properties listed,or eligible for listing,in the
National Register of Historic Places is auth�rized,until the District Engineer has complied with the provisions of 33
CFR Part 325,Appendix C. The prospective permittee musf notify the District Engineer if the suthorized activity
may affect any historic properties listed,deternvned to be eligible,or which We prospective pern�ittee has reason to
believe may be eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places,and shall not begin the activity until
notified by the District Engineer that the requirements of the National Historic Preservation Act have been satisfied
and that the activity is authorized. Information on the location and existence of}ristoric resources can be obtained
from t2ie State Historic Preservation Office and the National Register of Historic Places(see 33 CFR 334.4(g)). For
acrivities that may affect historic properties listed in,or eligible for listing in,the National Register of Historic
Places,�the notification must state which historic property may be affected by the proposed work or include a
vicinity map indicating the location of the historic properry.
13. �llotification.
(a)Timins:where required by the terms of the NWP,the prospective permittee must notify the District
Engineer with a preconstruction nonfication(PCI�as early as possi�ble. The District Engineer must determine if the
not�cation is complete within 30 days of the date of receipt and can request additional information necessary to
make the PCN complete only once. However,if the prospective permittee does not provide all of the requested
informarion,then the District Engineer will notify the prospective permittee that the nonfication is still incomplete
and the PCN review process will not commence until all of the requested inforniation has been received by the
District Engineer. The prospecteve permittee shall not begin the activity:
(1)Until notified in writing by the District Engineer that the activity may proceed uader the NWP with any
special conditions imposed by the District or Division Engineer;or
(2)If norified in writing by the District or Division Engineer that an Individual Permit is required;or
(3)Unless 45 days have passed from the District Engineer's receipt of the complete notification and the
prospecrive permittee has not received written notice from the District or Division Engineer. Subsequently,the
permittee's right to proceed under the NWP may be modified,suspended,or revoked only in accordance with the
procedure set forth in 33 CFR 330.5(d�2).
(b)Contents of Notification:The notifecation must be in writing and include the following information:
(1)Name,address and telephone numbers of the prospective permittee;
(2)Location of the proposed project;
(3)Brief description of the proposed projeci;the projecYs parpose;direct and indirect adverse environmental
effects the project would cause;any other NWP(s),Regional General Peimit(s),or Individual Permit(s)used or
intended to be used to authorize any part of the proposed project or any related activity. Sketches should be
3
provided when necessary to show that the activity complies with the terms of the NWP(Sketches usually clarify the
project and when provided result in a quicker decision.); •
(4)For NWPs 7, 12, 14, 18,21,34,38,39,40,41,42,and 43,the PCN must also include a delineation of
affected special aquatic sites, including wetlands,vegetated shallows(e.g.,submerged aquatic vegetation, seagrass
beds),and riffle and pool complexes(see paragraph 13(fl);
(5) For NWP 7(Outfall Structures and Maintenance),the PCN must include information regarding the original
design capacities and configurations of those areas of the facility where maintenance dredging or excavatior.is
proposed;
(6)For NWP 14(Linear Transportation Projects),The PCN must include a compensatory mitigation proposal to
offset permanent losses of waters of the US and a statement describing how temporary losses of waters of the US
will be minimized to the maximum extent practicable;
(7)For NWP 21 (Surface Coal Mining Activities),the PCN must include an Office of Surface Mining(OSM)
or state-approved mitigation plan,if applicable. To be authorized by this NWP,the District Engineer must
detemune that the activity complies with the terms and conditions of the NWP and that the adverse environmental
effects are minimal both individually and cumulatively and must notify the project sponsor of this determination in
writing;
(8)For NWP 27(Stream and Wetland Restoration),the PCN must include documentation of the prior condition
of the site that will be reverted by the permittee;
(9) For NWP 29(Single-Family Housing),the PCN must also include:
(i)Any past use of this NWP by the Individual Permittee and/or the permittee's spouse;
(ii)A statement that the single-family housing activity is for a personal residence of the pemvttee;
(iii)A description of the entire parcel,including its size,and a delineation of wetlands. For the purpose of this
NWP,parcels of land measuring '/,-acre or less will not require a formal on-site delineation. However,the applicant
shall provide an indication of where the wetlands are and the amount of wetlands that exists on the property. For
parcels greater than Y.-acre in size,formal wetland delineation must be prepared in accordance with the current
methud required by the Corps.(See paragraph 13(fl);
(iv)A written description of all land(including,if available,legal descriptions)owned by the prospecti've
permittee and/or the prospective permittee's spouse,within a one mile radius of the parcel,in any form of ownership
(including any land owned as a partner,corporation,joint tenant,co-tenant,or as a tenant-by-the-entirety)and any
land on which a purchase and sale agreement or other contract for sale or purchase has been executed;
(10)For NWP 31 (Maintenance of Existing Flood Control Projects),the prospective permittee must either
notify the District Engineer with a PCN prior to each maintenance activity or submit a five year(or less)
maintenance plan. In addition,the PCN must include all of the following:
(i)Sufficient baseline information identifying the approved channel depths and configurations and existing
facilities. Minor deviations are authorized,provided the approved flood control protection or drainage is not
increased;
(ii)A delineation of any affected special aquatic sites, including wetlands;and,
(iii)Location of the dredged material disposal site;
(11)For NWP 33 (Temporay Construction,Access,and Dewatering),the PCN must also include a restoration
plan of reasonable measures to avoid and minimize adverse effects to aquatic resources;
(12)For NWPs 39,43 and 44,the PCN must also include a written statement to the District Engineer explaining
how avoidance and minimization for losses of waters of the US were achieved on the project site;
(13)For NWP 39 and NWP 42,the PCN must include a compensatory mitigation proposal to offset losses of
waters of the US or justification explaining why compensatory mitigation should not be required. For discharges
that cause the loss of greater than 3001inear feet of an intermittent stream bed,to be authorized,the District
Engineer must determine that the activity complies with the other terms and conditions of the NWP,determ�ne
adverse environmental effects are minimal both individually and cumulatively,and waive the limitation on stream
impacts in writing before the pernuttee may proceed;
(14)For NWP 40(Agricultural Activities),the PCN must include a compensatory mitigation proposal to offset
losses of waters of the US. This NWP does not authorize the relocation of greater than 300 linear-feet of existing
serviceable drainage ditches constructed in non-tidal streams unless,for drainage ditches constructed in intermittent
non-tidal s�eams,the District Engineer waives this criterion in writing,and the District Engineer has determined
that the project complies with all terms and conditions of this NWP,and that any adverse impacts of the project on
the aquatic environment are minimal,both individually and cumulatively;
(15)For NWP 43 (Stormwater Management Facilities),the PCN must include,for the construction of new
stormwater management facilities, a maintenance plan(in accordance with state and local requirements, if
4
applicable)and a compensatory mitigation proposal to offset losses of waters of the US. For discharges that cause
the loss of greater than 3001inear feet of an intermittent stream bed,to be suthorized,the District Engineer must
determine that the activity complios with the other terms and conditions of the NWP,deterifline adverse
cnvironmental effects are minimal both i�ividually and cumulativcly,and waive the limitarion on stream impacts in
writing before the permittee may proceed;
(16)For NWP 44(Mining Activities),the PCN must include a description of all waters of the US adverseiy
affected by the project,a description of ineasures taken to minimiZe adverse effects to waters of the US,a
descriprion of ineasures taken to comply with the criteria of the NWP,and a reclamation plan(for all aggrcgate
mining artivities in isolated waters and non-tidal wetlands adjacent to hcadwaters and any hard rock/mineral mining
activities);
(17)For activiries that may adversely affect Federally-listed endangered or threatened species,the PCN must
include the name(s)of those endangered or threatened species that may be affected by the proposed work or utiliu
the designated critical habitat that may be affected by the proposed work;and
(18)For activities that may affect historic properties listed in,or eligible for listing in,the National Register of
Historic Places,the PCN must state which historic property may be affected by the proposed work or include a
vicinity map indicating the location of the historic property.
(c)Form of Noti,ficatio�:The s�tandard Individual Pernrit application form(Form ENG 4345)may be used as the
notification but must clearly indicate that it is a PGN and must include all of the information required in(b)(i)-(18)
of General Condition 13. A letter containing the nquisite information may also be used.
(�District Engincer's Decision:In reviewing the PCTT for the proposed activity,the District Engmeer will
determine whether the activity authorized by the NWP will result in mon than minimal individual or cumulative
adverse environmental effects or may be contrary to the public interest The prospective permittee may submit a
proposed mitigation plan with the PCN W expedite tbe process. The District Engineer will consider any proposed
compensatory mitigation the applicant has urcluded in the proposal in determining whether the net adverse
- environmcntal effects to the aquatic environment of the proposed work are minia�al. If thc District Enginecr
deterrrsnes that the activity complies with the tenau and conditions of th�NWP and that the adverse effects on the
aqustic environment are minimal,after considering mitigation,the District Engineer will notify the permittee and
includc�any conditions the District Engineer deems necessary. Thc District Engineer must approve any
compcnsatory mitigation proposal before the permittee comir�ences worl� If the prospective permittee is required to
submit=a coaqxnsatory mitigation proposal with the PCN,the proposal may b�eitha cenceptual or detailod. If the
prospoeiive per�mttee elects to submit a compensatory mitigation plan with the PCN,the District Engincer will
expedi�ously review the proposed compensatory mitigation plan. The District Engineer must review the plan within
45 days of reeeiving a complete PCN and determine whether the conceptual or specific proposed mitigation would
ensure no more than minimal adverse effects on the aquatic environmenG If the net adverse effects of the project on
t1�e aquatic environn�ent(after consideration of the compensatory mitigation proposal)are determined by the District
Engineer to be minimal,the Distiict Engineer will provide a timely written response to the applicant The response
will state that the pzoject can proceed under thc tern�s and conditions of the NWP.
If the District Engincer deLcrmines that the adverse effects of the proposed work are more than minimal,then
the District Engineer will notify the applicant either:(1)that the project does not qualify for authorization under the
NWP and insOn�ct the applicant on the procedures W seek authorization under an Individual Permit;(2)that the
project is suthorized under the NWP subject to the applicant's submission of a mitigation proposal that would
roduce the adverse effects on the aquatic enviro�ent to the minimal level;or(3)that the project is authorized under
the NWP with specific modifications or conditions. Where the District Enginecr detcrmines that mitigation is
required w ensure no mon than minimal adverse effects occur to the aquatic environnient,the activity will be
authorized within the 45-day PCN period. The authorization will include the nccessary conceptual or specific
mitigation or a requirement that the applicant submit a mitigation proposal that would red�e the adverse effecks on
the aquatic environm�nt to the minimal level. When conceptual mitigarion is included,or a mitigation plan is
required:u�der item(2)above,no work in waters of the US witl occur until the District Engineer has approved a
specific mitigation plan.
(e) ency Coordination:The Distirict Engineer will comsider any comtnents from Federal and state agencies
conceming the proposed activity's compliance with the terms and conditions of the NWPs and the need for
mitigarion to reduce the project's adverse environmental effects to a minimal level.
5
For activities requiring notif cation to the District Engineer that result in the loss of�reater than '/z-acre of
waters of the US,the District Engineer will provide immediately(e.g.,via facsimile transmission,overnight mail,or
other expeditious manner)a copy to the appropriate Federal or state offices(USFWS,state natural resource or water
quality agency,EPA,State Historic Preservation Officer(SHPO),and,if appropriate,the NMFS). With the
exception of NWP 37,these agencies will then have 10 calendar days from the date tlie material is transmitted to
telephone or fax the District Engineer notice that they intend to provide substantive,site-specific comments. If so
contacted by an agency,the District Engineer will wait an additional 15 calendar days before making a decision on
the notifcation. The District Engineer will fully consider agency comments received within the specified time
frame,but will provide no response to the resource agency, except as provided below. The District Engineer will
indicate in the administrative record associated with each notification that the resource agencies'concerns were
considered. As required by Section 305(b)(4)(B)of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management
Act,the District Engineer will provide a response to NMFS within 30 days of receipt of any Essential Fish Habitat
conservation recommendations.Applicants are encouraged to provide the Corps multiple copies of notificatinns to
expedite agency notification.
� (fl Wetland Delineations: Wetland delineations must be prepared in accordance with the cunent method r;;quired
by the Corps(For NWP 29 see paragraph(b)(9)(iii)for parcels less than Y,-acre in size). The permittee may ask the
Corps to delineate the special aquaric site. There may be some delay if the Corps does the delineation. Furthermore,
the 45-day period will not start until the wetland delineation has been completed and submitted to the Corps, where
appropriate.
14. Compliance Certifcation. Every permittee who has received NWP verification from the Corps will submit a
signed certification regarding the completed work and any required mitigation. The certification will be forwarded
by the Corps with the authorization letter and will include: (a)A statement that the authorized work was done in
accordance with the Corps authorization,including any general or specific conditions;
(b)A statement that any required mitigation was completed in accordance with the pernut conditions; and(c)The
signature of the permittee certifying the completion of the work and mitigation.
15. Use ofMultiple Nationwide Permits. The use of more than one NWP for a single and complete project is
prohibited,except when the acreage loss of waters of the US authorized by the NWPs does not exceed the acreage
limit of the NWP with the highest specified acreage limit(e.g. if a road crossing over tidal waters is constructed
under NWP 14,with associated bank stabilization authorized by NWP 13,the maximum acreage loss of waters of
the US for the total project cannot exceed 1/3-acre).
16. Water Supplv Intakes. No activity,including structures and work in navigable waters of the US or discharges of
dredged ar fill material,may occur in the proximity of a public water supply intake except where the activity is for
repair of the public water supply intake structures or adjacent bank stabilization.
17. ShellTsh Beds. No activity,including structures and work in navigable waters of the US or discharges of
dredged or fill material,may occur in areas of concentrated shellfish populations,unless the activity is directly
related to a shellfish harvesting activity authorized by NWP 4.
18. Suita6le Material. No activity, including structures and work in navigable waters of the US or discharges of
dredged or fill material,may consist of unsuitable material(e.g.,trash,debris,car bodies,asphalt,etc.)and material
used for construction or discharged must be free from toxic pollutants in toxic amounts(see Section 307 of the
CWA).
19. Mitigation. The District Engineer will consider the factors discussed below when determining the acceptability
of appropriate and practicable mitigation necessary to offset adverse effects on the aquatic environment that are
more than minimal.
(a)The project must be designed and constructed to avoid and minimize adverse effects to waters of the US to the
maximum extent practicable at the project site(i.e.,on site).
(b)Mitigation in all its forms(avoiding,minimizing,rectifying,reducing or compensating) will be required to the
extent necessary to ensure that the adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal.
(c) Compensatory mitigation at a minimum one-for-one ratio will be required for all wetland impacts requiring a
PCN,unless the District Engineer determines in writing that some other form of mitigation would be more
6
environmentally appropriate and provides a project-specific waiver of this requirement. Consistent with National
policy,the District Engincer wiil establish a preference for restoration of wetla�s as compensatory mitigation,with
preservation used only in exceptional circumstances.
(d)Compensatory mitigation(i.e.,replacement or substitution of aquatic resources for those i�acted)will not be
used to increase the acreage losses allowed by the acreage limits of some of the NWPs. For example, '/,-acre of
wetlands cannot be created to change a'/.-acre loss of wetlands to a'/:-acre loss associated with NWP 39
verification. However, '/:-acre of created wetlands can be used to reduce the impacts of a'/2-acre loss of wedands to
the minimum im�act Ievel in order to rrxet the minimal impact requirement associated with NWPs.
(e)To be practicable,the mitigatiom m�st be available and capable of being done considering costs,existing
technology,and logistics in light of the overali project purposes. Examples of mitigadon that may be appropriate
and practicable include,but are not limited to:reducing the size of the project;establishing and maintaining wctland
or upland vegetatad buffars to protect open waters such as streams;and replacmg losses of aquatic resource
functions and values by creating,restoring,enhancing,or preserving similar funetions and values,preferably in the
same watershed.
(fl Compensatory mitigation plans for projects ia or near sh�ams or other open watcrs will normally include a
requirerr�nt for the establishment,maintenance,and legal protection(e.g.,easemontg,de�d restrictions)of vegetatcd
buffers to open waters. In many cases,vegetated buffers will be the only compensatory mitigation required.
Vegetated buffers should consist of native species. The width of the vegetated buffers required will address
documented water quality or aquatic habitat loss concems. Normally,the vegetated buffer will be 25 to SO feet wide
on each side of the stream,but tbe District Engusecrs may roquire slighfly wider vegetated buffers w address
docamented water quality ar habitat loss concetns. Where both wctlands and open waters exist on the project site,
the Coips will detern�ine the appropriate compensatory aritigation(e.g.,siream bufftts or wetlands compensation)
based on what is best far the aquatic environment on a watershed basis. Ia cases where vegetated buffers are
determined to be the most appropriau fora�of compensatory mitigatioon,the District Engineer may waive or reduce
the requirema►t to provide wetland coa�ensatory mitigation for wetland impacts.
(g)Compensatory mitigation proposals sabmitted with the "notification"may be either conceptual or detailed. lf
conceptual plans are approved under the verification,then the Cotps will condition the verification to require
detailed pLans be submitted and appmved by thc Corps prior to construction of the authoriud activity in waters of
the US.
(h)Pernrittees may propose the use of avtigation banks,in-lieu fee anaagements or separate activity-specific
corr�nsatory mitigation. In all cases that require com�ensatory mitigation,the mitigation pmvisions will specify
8�e party responsibla for accomplishing andlor complying with the mi6gation plan.
20. SDawn[ng Area�. Activities,including structures and work ia navigable waters of the US or dischazges of
dredged or fill material,in spawning areas during spawning seasons must be avoided to the maximum exteat
practicable. Activities that result in the physical des�uction(e.g.,excavate,fill,or sawther downstream by
substantial tnrbidity)of an important spawning area are not authorized.
21. Mwrage►nent of Water FQws. To t�e maximum extent practicable,the activity must be designed W maintain
preconstruction downstream flow conditions(e.g.,location,capacity,and flow rates). Furthermore,the activity
must not peimanendy restrict or irnpede the passage of nom�al or expected high flows(urtless the primary purpose
of the fill is to impound waters)and the structure or discharge of dredged or fill material must withstand exp�ted
high flows_ The activity must,to the maximum extent practicable,provid�for retaining excess flows from the site,
provide for maintaining surface flow rates from the site similu to precons�uction conditions,and provide for not
iner�sing water flows from the project site,relocating wat�r,or redirecting water flow beyond preconstruction
conditions. Strcam channclizing will be reduced to the minimal amount necessary,and the activity must,to the
maximum extent practicable,rcduce adverse effects such as flooding or erosion downstream and upstream of the .
project site,unless the activity is part of a larger system designed to manage water flows. In most cases,it will not
be a requirement to conduct detailed studies and monitoring of water fiow.
This coadition is only applicable to projects that have the potential to affect waterflows. While appropriate
m�asures must be taken,it is not necessary to conduct detaikd studies to identify such measures or require
monitoring to ensure their effecriveness. Normally,the Corps will defer to state and local�uthorides regarding
management of water flow.
7
22. A�iverse E,{�'ects Fron:In:potrndments. If the activity creates an impoundment of water, adverse effects to the
aquatic system due to the acceleration of the passage of water,and/or the restricting its flow shall be minimized to �
the maximum extent practicable. This includes structures and work in navigable waters of the US,or discharges of
dredged or fill material.
23. Waterfowl Breecfing Areas. Activities,including structures and work in navigable waters of the US or
discharges of dredged or fill material,into breeding areas for migratory waterfowl must be avoided to the maximum
extent pracricable.
24. Removal o Tempora�,v Fills. Any temporary fills must be removed in their entirety and the affected areas
returned to their preexisting elevation.
25. Designated Critical Resource Wate�•s. Critical resource waters include,NOAA-designated marine sanctuaries,
National Estuarine Research Reserves,National Wild and Scenic Rivers,critical habitat for Federally listed
threatened and endangered species,coral reefs,state natural heritage sites,and outstanding national resource waters
or other waters.officially designated by a state as having particular environmental or ecological significance and
identified by the District Engineer after notice and opportunity for public comment. The District Engineer may also
designate additional critical resource waters after notice and opportunity for cornment.
(a)Except as noted below,discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the US are not authorized by
NWPs 7, 12, 14, 16, 17,21, 29,31,35,39,40,42,43,and 44 for any activity within,or directly affecting,critical
resource waters,including wetlands adjacent to such waters. Discharges of dredged or fill materials into waters of
the US may be authorized by the above NWPs in National Wild and Scenic Rivers if the activity complies with
General Condition 7. Further,such discharges may be authorized in designated critical habitat for Federally listed
threatened or endangered species if the activity complies with General Condition 11 and the USFWS or the''JMFS
has concurred in a determination of compliance with this condition.
(b)For NWPs 3, 8, 10, 13, 15, 18, 19,22,23,25,27,28,30,33,34, 36,37,and 38,notification is required
in accordance with General Condition 13,for any activity proposed in the designated critical resource waters
including wetlands adjacent to those waters. The District Engineer may authorize activities under these NWPs only
after it is determined that the impacts to the critical resource waters will be no more than minimal.
26. Fills Within 100-Year Floodplains. For purposes of this General Condition, 100-year floodplains will be
identified through the existing Federal Emergency Management Agency's(FEMA)Flood Insurance Rate Maps or
FEMA-approved local floodplain maps.
(a)Dischar�es in Floodplain;Below Headwaters. Discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the US
within the mapped 100-year floodplain,below headwaters(i.e. five cfs),resulting in permanent above-grade fills,
are not authorized by NWPs 39,40,42,43,and 44.
(b)Discharges in Floodway;Above Headwaters. Discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the US
within the FEMA or locally mapped floodway,resulting in permanent above-grade fills,are not authorized by
NWPs 39,40,42,and 44.
(c)The permittee must comply with any applicable FEMA-approved state or local floodplain management
requirements.
27. Construction Period. For activities that have not been verified by the Corps and the project was commenced or
under contract to commence by the expiration date of the NWP(or modification or revocation date),the work must
be completed within 12-months after such date(including any modification that affects the project).
For activities that have been verified and the project was commenced or under contract to commence within the
verification period, the work must be completed by the date detemuned by the Corps.
For projects that have been verified by the Corps,an extension of a Corps approved completion date may
requested. This request must be submitted at least one month before the previously approved completion date.
8
� Portland District Regional Conditions
(a)In-water Work Windows: No ESA-listed species will be impacted as a result of this project. There are
no State preferred in-water work windows for the project area.
(b)Upland Disposal: All excess material will be taken to a suitable upland location for disposal. The
material shall be placed in a location and manner that prevents its discharge into waterways or wetlands.
(c) Heavy Equipment: Heavy equipment shall be operated from the bank and not placed in the stream
unless specifically authorized by the District Engineer.Heavy equipment must be placed on mats or similar
precautions must be taken to minimize damage to wetland resources.
(d)Fish Screening: Fish Screening will comply with standards approved by the National Marine Fisheries
Service or the Oregon Department of Fish&Wildlife, as appropriate.
(e) Cultural Resources & Human Burials: Permittees must immediately notify the District Engineer if at
any time during the course of the work authorized,human burials,cultural resources, or historic properties,
as identified by the National Historic Preservation Act,may be affected. Failure to stop work in the area of
exposure until such time the Corps has complied with the provisions of 33 CFR 325, Appendix C,the
National Historic Preservation Act and other pertinent regulations,could result in violation of state and
federal laws. Violators are subject to civil and criminal penalties.
(� Fish Passage: Permittee shall insure activities authorized by nationwide permit will not restrict passage
of aquatic life. Activities such as the installation of culverts or diversion structures, or other modifications
to channel morphology must be designed to be consistent with fish passage standards developed by the
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife(ODFW) and the National Marine Fisheries Service(NMFS). The
standards can be found in the document entitled"ODFW standards and Criteria for Stream Road Crossings".
The streambed shall be returned to pre-construction contours after construction unless the purpose of the
activity is to eliminate a fish barrier.
(g)Riparian Vegetation Protection &Restoration: When working in waters of the United States or
riparian areas the construction boundary shall be minimized to the maximum extent practicable. Permittee
shall mark and clearly define the construction boundary before beginning work.Native riparian vegetation
will be successfully established along tributaries where the vegetation was removed by construction. The
plantings shall start at the ordinary high water mark and extend 10 feet back from the top of the bank. The
plantings must be completed by the end of the first planting season following the disturbance.
(h)Erosion Controls: All practicable erosion control devices shall be installed and maintained in good
working order throughout construction to prevent the unauthorized discharge of material into a wetland or
tributary. The devices shall be installed to maximize their effectiveness,e.g.. sediment fences shall generally
be buried or similarly secured. These controls shall bc maintained until permanent erosion controls are in-
place.
�nclosur� �
Practicable erosion control measures include but are not limited to the following:
a. Fill is placed in a manner that avoids disturbance to the maximum practicable extent(e.g.placing
fill with a machine rather than end-dumping from a truck).
b. Prevent all construction materials and debris from entering waterway; �
c. Use filter bags, sediment fences, sediment traps or catch basins, silt curtains, leave strips or berms,
Jersey barriers, sand bags,or other measures sufficient to prevent movement of soil;
d. Use impervious materials to cover stockpiles when unattended or during rain event;
e. Erosion control measures shall be inspected and maintained daily to ensure their continued
effectiveness;
£ No heavy machinery in a wetland or other waterway;
g. Use a gravel staging area and construction access;
h. Fence off planted areas to protect from disturbance and/or erosion; and
i. Flag or fence off wetlands adjacent to the construction area.
(i)Maps and drawings: In addition to the items required in Nationwide Permit General Conditions 13, all
preconstruction notifications shall contain maps showing the project location as well as plan-view and cross-
sectional drawings showing the proposed work. The map(s) shall be of a scale and detail to clearly identify
the project location(s). Drawings shall be sufficient in number and detail to accurately portray the project.
(j)Bank Protection: Rip-rap shall be clean, durable, angular rock. The use of other materials such as
broken concrete, asphalt, tires,wire, steel posts or similar materials is not authorized. The project design
shall minimize the placement of rock and maximize the use vegetation and organic material such as root
wads to the extent practicable. Riparian plantings shall be included in all project designs unless the
permittee can demonstrate they are not practicable. The permittee must notify the District Engineer in
accordance with nationwide permit general condition#13 for any activity that includes bank stabilization.
(k)Inspection of project site: The permittee must allow representatives of the Corps to inspect the
authorized activity to confirm compliance with nationwide permit terms and conditions. Personnel from the
Oregon Department of Environmental Quality and the Deparhnent of Land Conservation and Development
are considered to be authorized"representatives"for the purpose of Section 401 Water Quality or Coastal
Zone Management inspections. For projects on tribal land the Environmental Protection Agency is
considered an authorized representative. A request for access to the site will normally be made sufficiently
in advance to allow a property owner or representative to be on site with the agency representative making
the inspection.
(1) Sale of property/transfer of permit: If you sell the property associated with this permit,you must
transfer the permit to the new owner(s)and obtain their signature(s). A copy of this permit with the new
owner(s) signature shall be sent to this office to validate the transfer of this permit authorization
�nciosure �?
�
Y
= LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION
. � .
120 DAYS = 9/15/2006
FILE NOS.: SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 2006-10005
TREE REMOVAL PERMIT (TRE) 2006-00010
FILE TITLE: LANPHERE ENTERPRISES DRAINAGE WAY RELOCATION
APPLICANT: Lan�here F.nterprises OWNER: Lanphere Enterprises
125�0 SW Can�-on Road 12520 SW Can�-on Road
Beaverton, OR 97005 Bea�-erton, OR 97005
APPLICANT'S Peter F. Fn'
REP.: 2153 SW 1�1ain Street# 105
Portland, OR 97205
REQUEST: Z'he applicant is requesting Sensirive 1,ands Re�-iew approval to reroute a drainage way. T'he
proposed acriviry would also involve replacing and extending a culvert. The site includes two tax
lots, which are commoniti- owned. The applicant proposes to move the escisting draina e way, which
currendy separates tax lots 00700 and 00800, to the east property line of tax lot 0080� The owner
desires to reroute the drainage way to improce water com-e��ance and use the two tax lots as a single
site. t1 tree remo�-a1 permit is required to remove a 7" caliper tree in the drainage wa5�.
LOCATION: 10685 and 10655 SW Greenburg Road;WCT�1�1S35BB,Tas Lots 00700 and 00800.
ZONE: �iL'C: �T�ed L'se Commercial District. The �ZL�C zoning district includes land around the �
Washington Square Mall and land immediately west of Highway 217. Prunan' uses permitted include
office buildings, retail, and ser�-ice uses. r11so permitted are miXed-use deeelopments and housing at ,�
densiries of 50 units per acre. Larger buildulgs are encouraged in this area with parking under,
behind or to the sides of build'uigs.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: The appro��al standards for Sensirive Lands Re�-iew are described in Communin-De�-elopment Code
Chapters 18390 (Decision-�iaking Procedures), 18.510 (Commercial Zoning Dismcts), 18.630
(Washuigton Square Regional Center), 18.775 (Sensiri�-e Lands),and 18.790 (Tree Removal).
DECISION MAI�NG BODY BELOW: ❑ TYPE I � TYPE II ❑ TYPE III ❑ TYPE IV
DATE COMMENTS WERE SENT: MAY 24, 2006 DATE COMMENTS ARE DUE: JUNE 7, 200G _
❑HEARINUS OFFIC�,R (MON.) D��TE OF HEARII�'U: TI�iE: 7:00 PM
❑PI.r�NNING COMMISSION �MON.) D1�TE OF HEr1RING: TIi�1E: 7:00 I'M �
❑CITY COUNCIL (TUES.) D?�TE Of� HE:�RING: TI�iE: 7:30 PM
�STI�FF DECISION TENTATIVE D�1TE OF DECISIOI�1: UNE 19 2006
COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION
�VICINITY�I.-�P � 1�R��TY CORP. OF ENG. PERl'�7IT ❑ TR��FFIC r1N�LYSIS RPT.
�SITE PI.��N � N�RR�TI�'E ❑ GEOTECH REPORT
STAFF CONTACT: Emily Eng,Assistant Planner (503, 71) 8-2712
�i
� �., ..
May 1s, zoo� C�N OF TIGARD
�REGON
Peter F. Fry �
2153 SW Main Street, #105
Pordand, OR 97205
RE: Completeness Review-Lanphere Enterprises Sensitive Lands Review,
Case File No. SLR2006-10005
Dear Mr. Fry:
Staff has detexmined your application materials for Sensitive Lands Review (SLR2006-10005)
to reroute a drainage way at 10685 and 10655 SW Greenburg Road (WCTM 1 S35BB,Tax
Lots 00700 and 0080��o be complete.
Staff will now issue a request for comments and a two week comment period will follow.
The review process may take approximately six to eight weeks,but may vary depending on
findings made during the comment period. It should also be noted that staff has not
reviewed the applicarion submittal for compliance with the relevant code criteria, and that
the need for additional items may arise during the application review process.
If you have any questions,please conta.ct me at (503) 718-2712.
Sincerely,
�
E
Assistant Planner
13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772
CITY OF TIGARD
May 12, Zoo� OREGON
Peter F. Fry
2153 SW Main Street, #105
Portland, OR 97205
RE: Completeness Review-Lanphere Enterprises Sensitive Lands Review,
Case File No. SLR2006-10005
Dear Mr. Fry:
The City has received your revised applicarion materials for Sensirive Lands Review
(SLR2006-10005) to reroute a drainage way at 10685 and 10655 SW Greenburg Road;WCTM
1S35BB,Tax Lots 00700 and 00800. Staff has determined your submittal to be substanrively
complete. The following are necessary before the applicarion can be officially deemed
complete:
• Eight (8) copies of complete application packet.
• Two (2) sets of pre-stamped,pre-addressed envelopes. (I'roperty owner list must be
produced by Patty Lunsford in the Planning Department.)
Staff will issue a request for comments as soon as the application is officially deemed
complete and a two week comment period will follow. The review process may take
approxirnately siY to eight weeks,but may vary depending on fmdings made during the
comment period. It should also be noted that staff has not reviewed the application
submittal for compliance with the relevant code criteria,and that the need for additional
items may arise during the applicarion review process.
If you have any quesrions, please contact me at (503) 718-2712.
Sincerely,
Emily Eng
Assistant Planner
13125 SW Hall Blvd„ Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772
City of Tigard
13125 SW Hall Blvd. ��
Tigard, OR 97223 �
Ph #: (503) 639-4171 �
F� Tx�NSMl�rr�. ' ' '
Date May 16, 2006
Number of pages including cover 5
sheet
To: Peter Fry From: F.mily F,ng
Co: Co: Cit�of Tigard
Fax #: 503-274-1415 Fax#: 503-624-3C81
Ph#: �503) 639-4171,Ext. 2712
SUBJECT: Tree Removal Permit/Lan�here SLR
MESSAGE:
Peter,
I Iere is the tree removal permit applicarion,along with the applicable code secuon.
"I'hanks,
Emily Eng
Assistant Planner
(503) 718-2712
Pro'ect: ""� 7.�c� o0 0� �
LAHD USE APPLI �TION Date: �� , � -�� "
COMPLETENESS REVIEW � COMPLETE ❑ INCOMPLETE
STANDARD INFORMATION:
�/ eedlTitle/Proof Of Ownership ❑ Neighborhood Mtg.Affidavits,Minutes, List Of Attendees� Impact Study(18.390)
[�SA Seroice Provider Letter ❑ Construction Cost Es6mate � � #Sets Of Application MaterialslPlans
�]/Pre-Application Conference Notes Q� Envelopes With Postage(Verify Count)
PROJECT STATISTICS:
❑ Building Footprint Size ❑ %Of Landscaping On Site ❑ °/a Of Building Impervious Surface On Site
[�]/tot Square Footage
PLANS DIMENSIONED:
❑ Building Footprint ❑ Parking Space Dimensions(indude Access�b�e�eike Panc�r�}❑ Truck Loading Space Where Applicable
❑ Building Height ❑ Access Approach And Aisle ❑ Vsual Clearance Triangle Shown
ADDITIONAL PLANS:
❑ Vicinity Map ❑ Architectural Plan ❑ Tree Inventory
[�E 'sting Conditions Plan ❑ Landscape Plan
ite Plan ❑ Lighting Plan
TREE PLAN 1 MITIGATION PLAN:
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
ADDITIONAL REPORTS: (list any special repoRs)
�as t w. C a�.tvo� t�l.�..�n ❑
❑ _ - � ❑
❑ L .« . . ❑
RESPONSE TO APPLICABLE CODE SECTIONS:
❑ 18.330(Condi6onal Use) ❑ �8.620(Tgard Tnarg►e Design Standards) ❑�48.765(OffStreet Pa�lcirglLoading Requirements)
❑ 18.34�(Directors Interpretation) E/�� 18.630(Washington Square Regional Centerj �� 18.775(Sensitive l.ands Review)
❑ 18.350(Planned Devebpment) ❑ 18.705(Access/EgresslCirculation) ❑ 18.780(Sgns)
❑ 18.360(Site Devebprtient Review) ❑ 18.710(Accessory Residential Uni�s) ❑ 18,785(Tempo�ary use Permi�s)
❑ 18.370(VaaanoesrAdjustments) ❑ 18.715(Density Computatiau) � 18.790(iree Removal)
❑ 18.380(Zonirg MaprText,4mendments) ❑ 1 a.72O(Design Compatibilily Standards) ❑ 18.795(Visua�C�earance,4reas)
❑ 18.385(Miscellaneous Permils) ❑ 18.725(Environmental Perfortnance Standards) ❑ 18.797(WaOer Resourt�s(WR)Overlay District)
�18.390(Dedsan Making Prooeduresl�mpact SL�dy) ❑ 18.730(Exceptions To Devebpment Standards) ❑ 1$.79$(wireless Communica6on Fadlities)
❑ 18.41 O(Lot Line Adjustrnents) ❑ 18.�40(HistoriC Overi�y) ❑ 18.810(Street 8 uti�ity�mprovement 5tandards)
❑ 18.420(land Parti6ons) ❑ 18.742(Home Ocwpa6on Perm�s)
❑ 18.430(Subdivisions) ❑ 18.745(l.andscaping 6 Saeening Standards)
�8.510(Resi�enbal Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.750(ManufacturedMlobil Home Regula6ons)
18.520(Commereial Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.755(Maed So1id WastelRecycling Srorage)
❑ 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districls) ❑ 18.760(Nonwnfortning Situations)
ADDITIONAL ITEMS:
`T.t�o a Lw�.o��. �e c��'
�l S 14. Coc. �c Ntr
(�1�SL- �o'�G�
I:lcurpinlmasters\revisedlland use application completeness review.dot REVISED: 17-Jan-o�
N o t� � t r-f- ��w-�-w�- ��e� �� SP�`f" �/l � � zO° j°
LAND USE APPL� 1TION D teect:_ i� � - � ���: �
-. �
COMPLETENESS REVIEW ❑ COMPLETE [� INCOMPLETE
STAND�R�-INFARM�4Ta[�N:_� __
❑ . DeedlTitle/Proof Of Ownershi� ❑ Neighborhood Mtg.Affidavits, Minutes, List Of Attendees❑ �Impact Study 1( 8 3901�
Q� U ervice Provider Letter ❑ Construction Cost Estimate ❑ #Sets Of Application Materials/Plans
[� Pre-Application Conference Notes ❑ Envelopes With Postage(Verify Count)
PR ECT STATISTICS: -____
Building Footprint Size ❑ o Of Landscaping On � ❑ % f Building Impervious Surfa�ce'6a,Site
�' Lot Square Footage n � �
. �
PLA S DIMENSIONED: '\
Building Footprint ❑ Parking Space Dimensions(in�ude Accessible&Bi arking)❑ Truck Loading Space Where Applicable
❑ Building Height ❑ Access Approach And Aisle `� ❑ Visual Clearance Triangle Shown
AD TIONAL PLANS: �
Vcinity Map ❑ Architectural Plan � ❑ Tree Inventory
� E_x�istin�Conditions Plan ❑ Landscaoe�'(�r�-fir� ��o^s����
_ itr5 e Plan�` ❑ Lighting Plan
�t'.+�,�c f� c_�a-.L� ;"�,� ;�.,.� �ct cu.l.�`rn,� �� (� c�.k �- cZ��--� -� ,f i�--��
TREE PLAN 1 MITIGATION PLAN: �--�� �L� �cc-- ' a�.,� �
❑ �`�'` �. L � �.re�uz� r �
i
❑ ❑
ADDITIONAL REPORTS: (list any special reports)
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
RESPONSE TO APPLICABLE CODE SECTIONS:
❑ 18.330(Conditional Use) ❑ 18.620(Tgard Tnangle Desgn Standards) ❑ 18,765(Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements)
❑ 18.340(Direccor's Interpretation) � 18.630(Washington Square Reganal Center) � 18.775(Sensitive I..ands Review)
❑ 18.350(Planned Development) ❑ 18.705(AccesslEgresslCirculation) ❑ 18.780(Sgns)
❑ 18.360(Site Devebpment Review) ❑ 18.71 O(Accessory Residential Uni�) ❑ 18.785(7emporary Use Permits)
❑ 18.370(VarianceslAdjustrnents) ❑ 18.715(Densiry Computations) ❑ . 90(7ree Remoir�q
❑ 18.380(Zoning MaplTe�Amendments) ❑ 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) ❑ 18.795(vi�uat C�earance Areas)
❑ 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) b���`� ❑ 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) ❑ 18.797(Water Resour�es(WR)Overlay District)
� 18.390(Decision Making Proceduresl pad Stud'y) ❑ 18.730(Exceptions To Development Shandarcls) ❑ 18.798(Wireless Communication Facili6es)
❑ 18.410(Lot Line Adjustments) ❑ 18.740(Historic Overiay) ❑ 18.810(Street 8 Utiliry Improvement Srandards)
❑ 18.420(l.and Parti6ons) ❑ 18.742(Home Occupation Permits)
❑ 18.430(Subdivisans) ❑ 18.745(�andscaping&Screening Srandards)
❑ 18.510(Residential Zoning Disiricts) ❑ 18.750(ManufacturedlMobil Home Regulations)
�] 18.520(Commeraal Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.755(Mixed Solid WastelRecycling Storage)
❑ 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.760(Nonconforming Situations)
ADDITIONAL ITEMS:
(r'�i r�SP �a�Ltel��� �� � a r�� c, " Y t���i�:n `1�e , b,�, z�:�� �.t,-C� � �
�:-� � r_ 1
�t�i.��.�r ��rc. �-t-d.�� �l, ('�-- -
I:\curpin\masters\revised\land use application completeness review.dot REVISED: 17-Jan-o�
� 5(3sf�p, �
,
`7�0
PUBUC FAClLlTY PLAN Project: Lanphere
COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST Dafe: 4/19/16
GRADING
� Existin and ro osed contours shown.
❑ Are there radin im acts on ad'acent arcels?
❑ Ad�acent arcel rades shown.
❑ Geotech stud submitted?
STREETISSUES
❑ Ri ht-of-wa clearl shown.
❑ Centerline of street s clearl shown.
❑ Street name s shown.
❑ Existin / ro osed curb or ed e of avement shown.
❑ Street rofiles shown.
❑ Future Street Plan: Must show street profiles, topo
on ad�acent arcel s , etc.
❑ Traffic Im act and/or Access Re ort
❑ Street rades com liant?
❑ Street/ROW widths dimensioned and a ro riate?
❑ Private Streets? Less than 6 lots and width
a ro riate?
❑ Other:
SANITARY SEWER ISSUES
❑ Existin / ro osed lines shown.
❑ Stubs to ad'acent arcels re uired/shown?
WATER ISSUES
❑ Existin / ro osed lines w/ sizes noted?
❑ Existin / ro osed fire h drants shown?
❑ Pro osed meter location and size shown?
❑ Pro osed fire rotection s stem shown?
STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES
Existin / ro osed lines shown?
Preliminary sizing calcs for water quality/detention Provide calculations for water quality and for
provided? sizing of the ditch (Sheef 5/7 shows a/ot of
new proposed paving). Water quality
freatment should be provided for all
impervious suriace areas, new and existsing.
Show calculations regarding detenfion (net,
new impervious surface area exceeding
10,000 sf?
� Water ualit /detention facilit shown on lans?
❑ Area for facilit match re uirements from calcs?
❑ Facilit shown outside an wetland buffer?
❑ Storm stubs to ad�acent arcels re uired/shown?
REV IS ED: 04/19/06
,
Y
' " �j- IU -D�
The submittal i hereby deemed �COMPLETE � INCOMPLETE
gy: Date: 4/18/06
rJU I�G� PF�U�IU 6 O( � 1�'�F��l�-�l 6�.,5 I�2E�{-
� L(�u��� u,l�D� f �-(S L A �u� Cl SE w�e .
�V(� ������� ,
REVISED: 04/19/06
PUBLlC FACILlTY PLAN Project: Lanphere
COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST Date: 4/19/16
GRADING
� Existin and ro osed contours shown.
❑ Are there radin im acts on ad�acent arcels?
❑ Ad�acent arcel rades shown.
❑ Geotech stud submitted?
STREETISSUES
❑ Ri ht-of-wa clearl shown.
❑ Centerline of street s clearl shown.
❑ Street name s shown.
❑ Existin / ro osed curb or ed e of avement shown.
❑ Street rofiles shown.
❑ Future Street Plan: Must show street profiles, topo
on ad'acent arcel s , etc.
❑ Traffic Im act and/or Access Re ort
❑ Street rades com liant?
❑ StreeUROW widths dimensioned and a ro riate?
❑ Private Streets? Less than 6 lots and width
a ro riate?
❑ Other:
SANITARY SEWER ISSUES
❑ Existin / ro osed lines shown.
❑ Stubs to ad�acent arcels re uired/shown?
WATER ISSUES
❑ Existin / ro osed lines w/ sizes noted?
❑ Existin / ro osed fire h drants shown?
❑ Pro osed meter location and size shown?
❑ Pro osed fire rotection s stem shown?
STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES
❑ Existin / ro osed lines shown?
❑ Preliminary sizing calcs for water quality/detention Provide calculations for water quality and for
provided? sizing of the difch (Sheet 5/7 shows a/of of
new proposed paving). Water quality
freatment should be provided for all
impervious surface areas, new and existsing.
Show calculations regarding detention (net,
new impervious surface area exceeding
90,000 sf?
� Water ualit /detention facilit shown on lans?
❑ Area for facilit match re uirements from calcs?
❑ Facilit shown outside an wetland buffer?
❑ Storm stubs to ad�acent arcels re uired/shown?
REVISED: 04/19/06
. • �
�
The submittal i hereby deemed ❑ COMPLETE � INCOMPLETE
By: Date: 4/18/06
REVISED: 04/19/06
Patty Lunsford - Re: SLR2006-1000� ' anphere Page 1
From: Patty Lunsford
To: Emily Eng
Date: Friday, May 19, 2006 2:53:56 PM
Subject: Re: SLR2006-10005 Lanphere
Emily,
I guess I will just make a copy of this note for the file for future reference. In the future, you should keep
everything.
Thank you!
Patty
»> Emily Eng 5/19/06 11:47 AM »>
Patty,
I have turned in the original submittals plus correspondence-all except the first incompleteness letter I
sent on 4/19. I used the same document to write the "substantively complete" letter, and saved it after I
had deleted everything required in the original incomplete letter. And I didn't make a copy of it either. I
also threw out my first completeness checklist(when it had been deemed incomplete). I just wanted to
let you know. Is there something I should do about these missing documents?
Thanks,
Emily
<:... .. _ ..
� � ` CITY OF TIGARD
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES �omn>>�;;t�,� Decefopment
Shaping f7 BetterCommunity
(Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Yalid for Six (6) Months)
NON-RESIDENTIAL
a�r�o� -� o
�,ara�: � kG{.
APPLICANT: /�ET��� ��'� AGENT:
Phone: (.�3) z�L� - .��'yy' Phone: � )
PROPERTY LOCATION:
ADDRESS/GENERAL LOfATION: i��- )" � 5�� L���u,y /!0 6 s-S' ?�-- �-�t^z�-�
TA% MAP(S)/LOT #(S): ; f_ , (�7�
.
NECESSARY APPUCATIONS: S r��s� 7-1��� G.�-i+.1�S �t�C-7/C�7 I'�,���
PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: ���r'�''���`�' �i��-�6rL c����i�N��'%
>> �' s� � v�
-- ,4�� r} fe��.�+�f �j�� .
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
MAP DESIGNATION: 1 rl L�C� !71/,x��J usc C'�����<<�
ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: :ll lJ�
CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAM (C.I.T.)AREA: � fi s T-
i0NIN6 DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Sectlon 18. 7 T� l
MINIMUM LOT SIZE: sq. ft. Average Min. lot width: ft. Max. building height: ft.
Sotbacks: Front ft. Side ft. Rear ft. Corner ft. from street.
MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: %.
❑ NEI6HBORHOOD MEETIM6 [Refer to the Neighborh�ad Meeting Nandoutl
THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, THE MEMBERS
OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S), AND THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION of
their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is
required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting
notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting vour application or the application will not be
accepted.
" NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans
Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 8
NON-Residen6al Application/Planning Division Section
� NARRATIYE [Refer to Code,__.�pter 18.3901
The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable
approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to
consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review
the code for applicable criteria.
❑ IMPACT STUDY [Refer to Code Secdons 18.390.040 and 18.390.0501
As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE
IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the
development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the
transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system,
the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type
of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize
the impact of the development on the public at larg e, public facilities systems, and affected private
property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real
property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or
provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not
roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development.
❑ ACCESS [Refer to Chapters 18.105 and 18.7651
Minimum number of accesses: Minimum access width:
Minimum pavement width:
All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved.
Drive-in use queuing areas:
❑ WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Sectlon 18.705.0301
WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE
GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and
industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide
convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial
complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and
neighboring developments.
❑ SPECIAL SETBACKS [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7301
:- STREETS: feet from the centerline of
� LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet, along the site's boundary.
� FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK.
❑ SPECIAL BUILDIN6 HEI6NT PROYISIOMS [Refer to Code Section 18.130.010.BJ
BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a
height of 75 feet provided that:
➢ A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist;
➢ All actual building setbacks will be at least half('/2) of the building's height; and
➢ The structure will not abut a residential zoned district.
❑ BUFfERIN6 AND SCREENIN6 [Refer to Code Chapter 18.1451
In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE
OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the
City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are
described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous
and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance befinreen vertical and horizontal
plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if
not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may o� be occupied by vegetation, fences,
utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be
found in the Development Code.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 8
NON-Residential ApplicationlPlanning Division Section
The ESTIMATED REQ��r2ED BUFFER WIDTHS aqplicable to r�ur proqosal area are:
feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary.
feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary.
IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG:
❑ LANDSCAPIN6 [Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.765 and 18.1051
STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR
PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must
be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of-
way boundary. Street trees must have a mmimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured
four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the
branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations
affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division.
A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED
in and around all parkin� areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking
areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view.
These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised
planters.
❑ RECYCLINC [Refer to Cade Chapter 18.7551
Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE
SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such
as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within
Pride Disposal's Service area. Lenny Hing is the contact person and can be reached at (503)
625-6177.
❑ PARKIN6 [Refer to Code Secdon 18.165.0401
REQUIRED parking for this type of use:
Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s):
SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking:
Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s):
NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED
AS COMPACT SPACES.
PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows:
➢ Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet, 6 inches.
➢ Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 6 inches.
Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that
separates the parking space from an adjoining space.
Note: A maximum of three (3)feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can
be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as
landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements.
HANDICAPPED PARKING:
➢ All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED
DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking
spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans
with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space
symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted.
➢ BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile tra�c and
in convenient locations.
❑ LOADIN6 AREA REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18.765.0801
Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be
provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City
Engineer.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 8
NON-Residential ApplicationlPlanning Division Section
�] BIC�YCLE RACKS [Refer to� ,Sectlan 18.7651
BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in
convenient locations.
�J SEMSITIYE LANDS [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7151
The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR
DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL
DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON
UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre-
application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to preciselv
identifv sensitive land areas, and their boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas
meetinq the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearlv indicated on plans submitted with the
development application.
Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands
areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS.
❑ STEEP SLOPES [Refer to Code Sectlon 18.715.080.C1
When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be
submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code
Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall
include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C.
'� CLEANWATER SERVICES[CWSI BUFFER STANDARDS [Refer to R a 0 96,44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3l
LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a
vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive
area.
Desi n Criteria:
The EGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table
identifies the required widths:
TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS
SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL/RESOLUTION 8� ORDER 96-44
SENSITIVE AREA DEFINITION SLOPE ADJACENT 4 WIDTH OF VEGETATED
TO SENSITIVE AREA CORRIDOR PER SIDE
♦ Streams with intermittent flow draining: �25�
7 � 10 to <50 acres 15 feet
� >50 to <100 acres 25 feet
• Existing or created wetlands <0.5 acre 25 feet
• Existing or created wetlands >0.5 acre <25% 50 feet
• Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow
♦ Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres
♦ Natural lakes and onds
• Streams with intermittent flow draining: >25%
� 10 to <50 acres 30 feet
� >50 to <100 acres 50 feet
• Existing or created wetlands >25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure
• Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow in 25-foot increments from the starting
♦ Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres point to the top of ravine (break in
• Natural lakes and ponds <25%slope), add 35 feet past the top
of ravine`
Starting point for measurement = edge of the defined channel (bankful flow) for streams/rivers, delineated wetland boundary, delineated spring
boundary, and/or average high water for lakes or ponds, whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intermittent springs, located a minimum of 15
feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated corridor,shall not serve as a staRing point for measurement.
SVegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition.
6The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to
15 feet, if a stamped geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 8
NON-Residential ApplicationlPlanning Division Section
� ' F2estrictions in the VeQ � Corridor:
NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals,
dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract
from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as provided for in the
CWS Design and Construction Standards.
Location of Veqetated Corridor:
IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended
for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a
separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit.
CWS Service Provider Letter:
� PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service
� Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the R&O 96-44 sensitive
area req uirements. If there are no sensitive areas, CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS
Service Provider Letter is not required.
❑ SI6NS [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7801
SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of
Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or
height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a
development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for
Director's review.
❑ TREE REMOYAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Secdon 18.790.030.CJ
A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a
certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a
development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development,
or conditional use is flled. Protection is preferred over removal where possible.
THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following:
➢ Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated
as significant by the City;
➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in
caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D according
to the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code
provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots:
� Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation
program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees;
� Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existin� trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-
thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.;
� Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50%
of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.;
� Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no
mitigation;
➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and
➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to
protect trees during and after construction.
TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT
APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be
replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D.
❑ MITI6ATION [Refer to Code Section 18.790.060.E1
REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines:
➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics.
➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damaged is not reasonably
available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural
resource value.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8
NON-Residential ApplicationlPlanning Division 5ection
` � y If a replacemer. :e of the size cut is not reasonably ilable on the Iocal market or would
not be viable, the Director shall require replacement witn more than one tree in accordance
with the following formula:
� The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated
caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably
available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the
subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted
on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner,
private property.
➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to
allow growth to maturity.
IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the
consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree
replacement.
❑ CLEAR VISION AREA [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7951
The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND
EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size
of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting streeYs functional classification and any
existing obstructions within the clear vision area.
❑ ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code S�ction 18.810.0601
MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process.
Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum
15-foot wide access easement.
The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 2'/z TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the
parcel is less than 1'/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district.
CODECNAPTERS
_ 18.330(Condi�ona�use) 18.620(Tigard 7riang�e Desgn Standards) _ 18.765(Otf-Street Parkingl�oading Requirements)
_ 18.340(Directors�nterpretation) ✓ �8.630(Washington Square Regbnal Center) ?�18.775(Sensitive�ands Review)
_ 18.350(P�anr�ed oevebpment) 18.705(Access�9ress�Circu�ation) _ 18.780(si�ns)
_ �8.360(Site Devebpment Review) 'I S.7�O(Accessory Residential Units) _ �H.7S5(Temporary Use Permiis)
_ 18.370(varianceslAdjustrnents) 18.715(Density Computations) _ 18.790(7ree Remova�)
_ 18.380(Zoning►v►ap�Text Amendments) 18.720(Design Compatibiliry Standards) - 18.795(Visual C�earance Areas)
_ 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) �$.725(EnvironmenTal Performance Standards) _ �S.79S(Wireless Communica6on Fadlities)
�c �8.390(Deasion Making Proceduresllmpact Study) �$.730(Exceptions To Devebpment Standarcfs) _ �H.H�O(Street&Utility Improvement Standarcls)
_ ')8.4'I O(Lot Line Adjustrnents) 18.740(Hismric Over�ay)
_ 18.420(�and Partitions) 18.742(Home occupation Perm�s)
_ �S.43O(Subdivisions) �8.745(�andscaping 8 Saeening Standards)
_ 18.51 O(Residentia�Zoning�istricts) 'I 8.�50(ManufacturedlMobil Home Regulations)
�'18.520(Commerda�Zoning Districts) 18.755(Mixed So�id waste�Recyc�ing Storage)
_ 18.530(Industria�Zoning�istricts) 18.760(Nonconforming Situations)
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 8
NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section
� • .
� ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMR.__.�S:
_ • ,
.>, a.-�-u _r'-9�z! ����" /' �.u-c�� � �C�' �� r: � -�>z � -'1c:��.
k r J�'1;,,,N L.'/G,�,,,� CL�LI:� ,�C.�-cr'�17 %J`v�-!�L` �'(i`��{� �zLf�rd .�
_T
/_ul�'��.,� .� ,a✓= ������i�7.
?� ; i 5� �vy��,
11/1k�1 �;f% 5._,C,i� :- 7i' C'L`/Z'��S /!�SC. /C ��' /�:-�«' ' _.>r.'�P.:
� ,
���(/!L lG —'/11C1)�f'� :
-�- � C�`` >
l���l� y�/��rc�- �`��lcCl? . �Lj — ,� �,,5� UYILc{.LGS �iGY�tI�� 'iF�c � � �� /� ��1���
� S L'' L�./ 9/'/�/i-it r �'�%.�l. -�% �t� � �' )G� ��'.'ll L
�
�
( �/�L%i S /'��GG l;> �i� 1U(,C �.4--4t,°'��l f�����
PROCEDURE
r Administrative Staff Review.
Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer.
Public hearing before the Planning Commission.
Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a
recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be
held by the City Council.
APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS
All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the
Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: A lications
submitted b mail or dro ed off at the counter without Plannin ivision acceptance may e
returne . e annina counter c oses at 4:
Ma s submitted with an a lication shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 b 11 inches. One (1),
� x ma o a ro ose ro'ect s ou e su mittec�for attac ment to t e sta re ort or
a_ ministratrve ecision. pp ication wit un o e maps sha not e accepted.
The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perForm a preliminary review of the
application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter
submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted
materials are required.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 8
NON-Residentlal ApplicationlPlanning Division Section
. ` The administrative dec�_ �n or public hearing will �pically occt� aproximately 45 to 60 days after an
application is accepted as being complete by the lanning Division. Applications involving difficult or
protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review.
Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public
hearing. A 10-day public appeal perio� follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter
would be heard by the Tigard �1c%1%����� � c'{=�«<� . A basic flow chart
which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request.
Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the
applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing.
This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE
INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code
requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff
and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the
site.
BUILDIN6 PERMITS
PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR
REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by
the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of
development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the
Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is
recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are
building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed.
Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be
demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that
structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the Cit 's olic is to a I those s stem
develo ment credits to the first buildin ermit issued in the develo ment (UNLE S OTHERWISE
DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER A THE TIME IN WHICH T E DEMOLITION PERMIT IS
OBTAINED).
e con erence an no es canno cover a o e requiremen s an aspec s re a e , o
site planning that should ap ply to the develo p,ment of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide
information required by the Gode shall not cons�ltute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements.
It is recommended that a prospectiye applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Cotle or
ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submittin an application.
AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN
APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A
PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as
unnecessary by the Planning Division).
PREPARED BY: /� �
CITY OF TIGARD LA NIN IVISION - STAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP. MEETING
PHONE: (503) 639-4111 FAX: (503) 684-7291
E-MAIL• (staH's first name�p�Ci.tigard.or.us
nnE�s(fITY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE)INTERNETADDRESS: WWW.CI.tigard.01'.IIS
H:lpattyMasterslPre-App Notes Commercial.doc Updated: 3-Oct-02
(Engineering section:preapp.eng)
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 8
NON•Residen6al ApplicatioNPlanning Division Section
� PRE-A�PLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES
➢ ENGINEERING SECTION Q �o�°n"ty�°�,�"nt
SFiapingA BetterCommunity
PUBLIC FACILITIES Tex Mep(Sl: 1S135BB
Tax Loasl: ]00
use 1�Ipe: Commerciai
The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant
will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be
no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned
commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on
the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements
that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project.
Right-of-wav dedication:
The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public:
(1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification
right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or
(2.) For the creation of new streets.
Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for:
❑ SW to feet
❑ SW to feet
❑ SW to feet
❑ SW to feet
Street imqrovements:
❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include:
❑ feet of pavement
❑ concrete curb
❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities
❑ -foot concrete sidewalk
❑ street trees
❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee.
❑ Other:
CITY OF T16ARD Pre-Appltcatlon Comeronce Notes Page 1�f 6
�oei..•rt.�ar.m..n s•eu��
, ❑ street improv�,�ients will be necessary along SW , to include:
❑ feet of pavement
❑ concrete curb
❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities
❑ -foot concrete sidewalk
❑ street trees
❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee.
❑ Other:
❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include:
❑ feet of pavement
❑ concrete curb
❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities
❑ -foot concrete sidewalk
❑ street trees
❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee.
❑ Other:
❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include:
❑ feet of pavement
❑ concrete curb
❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities
❑ -foot concrete sidewalk
❑ street trees
❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee.
❑ Other:
❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include:
❑ feet of pavement
❑ concrete curb
❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities
❑ -foot concrete sidewalk
❑ street trees
❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a finro-year streetlight fee.
CITY OF T16ARD Pre-Ilpptl�C�oferon�e N�tes Pag�2�t 6
Fa��■••d■��q���n s�enn
❑ Other:
Aareement for Future Street Improvements:
In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently
practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval
may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to provide a future improvement guarantee.
The City Engineer will determine the form of this guarantee. The following street improvements may
be eligible for such a future improvement guarantee:
(1.)
�2.)
Overhead Utility Lines:
❑ Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines
adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a
fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines
are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to
$ 35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines.
There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW
Prior to , the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-
lieu described above.
Sanitarv Sewers:
The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) inch line which is located . The
proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's
responsibility to
Water Supply:
The (Phone:(503) � provides public water service in the area of this site. This service
provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development.
Fire Protection:
Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (South Division) [Contact: Eric McMullen, (503) 612-7010]
provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for
information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other
questions related to fire protection.
Storm Sewer Improvements:
All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed
to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm
CITY OF TI6ARD Pre-Appllcatl�n Cameronca N�tes Page 3 of 6
Eq�u�d�o e���rtse�t secn•.
drainage plan for the site. �nd may be required to prepare a s��"-basin drainage analysis to ensure
�that the proposed system accommodate runoff from upstrea, roperties when fully developed.
Storm Water Quality:
The City has agreed to enforce SurFace Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the
Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which requires the construction of
on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus
contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces.
The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing
an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether
or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new
impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210.
Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the
development application. It is anticipated that this project will require:
❑ Construction of an on-site water quality facility.
❑ Payment of the fee in-lieu.
Other Comments:
All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City
maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance
access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily
accessible.
1) Stormwaterplans must be reviewed and approved by CWS (possib/y the Co►ps/DSL & ODF�VI�
2) City plan review will be by the Building Department.
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES
In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic
Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected
impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon
the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of
the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee
category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of buildinq permit issuance. In limited
circumstances, payment of the TIF inay be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy
permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible o� when the TIF is greater than
$5,000.00.
CITY OF TI6ARD Pre-Applicatl�n Cwferonce N�ea Pago 4�f 6
�.p■..n.�ur.ra..■�s•cn•.
PEIRMITS
Public Facility Improvement (PFI) Permit:
Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a PFI permit from the Engineering
Department. A PFI permit application is available at the Planning/Engineering counter in City Hall.
For more extensive work such as street widening improvements, main utility line extensions or
subdivision infrastructure, plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for
review and approval.
The Engineering Department fee structure for this permit is considered a cost recovery system. A
deposit is collected with the application, and the City will track its costs throughout the life of the
permit, and will either refund any remaining portion of the deposit, or invoice the Permittee in cases
where City costs exceeds the deposit amount. NOTE: Engineering Staff time will also be tracked for
any final design-related assistance provided to a Permittee or their engineer prior to submittal of a PFI
permit application. This time will be considered part of the administration of the eventual PFI permit.
The Permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security.
Where professional engineered plans are required, the Permittee must execute a Developer/Engineer
Agreement, which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public
improvement construction work. The PFI permit fee structure is as follows:
NOTE: If an PFI Permit is required,t�e applicant must obtain that
permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Diuision.
Buildinq Division Permits:
The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more
detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at
503-639-4171, ext. 304.
Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial,
industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot
grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading
and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in
cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation
excavation material is not to be hauled from the site.
Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued
after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit.
Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all
work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This
permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially
complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City.
For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a
mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit.
Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing
that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information.
CITY OF i16ARD Pre-Appllcatl�n C�meronce Not�s Page 5�f 6
�•�i■••„•��n.n..na.en•.
GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS
All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The
engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as
well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in
determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer
will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each
homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall
include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall
also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building.
PREPAREDBY: r� C ,�_�. � �.� r� �r�¢
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ST FF tl DATE
Phone: [5031639-4171
Fax: [503)6240152
document2
Revised: September 2,2003
CR'Y OF TI6ARD Pro-Applicatlon CoMer�nce Notes Page 6 ef 6
Eng�u�dpe Y�rarnae�t S�cnee
11/09/2004 17:34 FA% 50�g981960 CITY OF TIGARD �002
. i
z '
��-�-c.l� ��-� �l� �u r i s d'r � f � ��.ln�� � i
C�12���'l C��'��-- � � �
�
�PRE-APPLiCATI�N ;
CaNFERENCE REC�UEST �
CITY Of TIOARD
13125 SW Ha11 Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503)639-49 71 FAX.(503) 684-7297 �
. '
GENERAL{NFORMAT N
�' FOR STAFF USE ONL �
�_ � � `
App�icant: _ � '
*�/ � Pho e: �3 �7`�a7� case No.: }�� �ov�a - � a�
Address• ' �
r�Q� ��� Receipt No.: ���`�� _ .
,�
Z�p' ted B `
City: Application Accep y: r�;� �
Contact Persan: Pho�e� S� �� y Date: i I � �F�� ��`E �
i
Property OvvnerlDeed Hclder(s); DATE OF PRE-APP.: ti�" �� v�{
r 71ME OF PRE-APP.: ► 0 : c�c> '
�
Address: ��S� ��) l�y��� Phone: PRE-APP.HELD WI'fH: :
/j.��Q� ,[� Zi 0 Rav.711104 i:�aaPM��t°�'ed�P�APORe4�aat.doc
Cil�l: 1�i C�C�/ TD/L� O p'
Property Addressl�ccation(sj:
E UIRED SUBMI7TAL ELEMENTS
(Note: applicati�ons will not be eccepbd
�D • �__� r � � without the requlred submitbi elementsl
Tax Mep 8�T�Lot#(s): ` �
� Pre-Applicetlon Conf.Request Form
Zonin9� , �COPIES EACH OF THE FOLL.OWING:
Site Size: � � [] erief Descriptbn of the P�oP°sal and
any site-specific question�ssues that
�RE.pPpLICATION CONFEREN E INF�RAAATION p�or�me meeb�g have staff research
q�� vf thg informaUon identified on this fonn are reguired to be � 5ite Plan. 7he site plan must show the
subm�tted by the applicant and received by the Planning Division a proposed lots and/or building layouts
minimu of one 1 week 'or tio a�i ' 11 schedulin a d� to scale. Also, show the locatio�
re- li tivn confer nc atelbme to aliow staff ample ame to pf ine subject property in relation to the
p�pare for the meeting. nearest streets; and the locations of
driveways on ths subject property a�d
q pre-application conferenc� can usually be scheduled within 1-2 ac�oss the street.
wseks of the Planning Division's receipt of the request for either The Proposeci Uses.
Tuesda� er Thursdav morninas• Pre-aPp��cation conferences a�e O rvpogrdphic lnformation. Include
ne 1 hour lon and are typically held between the hours � Contour Lines if Possible.
:00-11:00 A
❑ If the Pre-Applicativn Cvnfe�ence is for
PRE-HPPIICATION CONF�RENCES MUST BE SCHEDUL�D IN a MONOPOLE project, the applictu�t
P�RSON A7'fHE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN'�COUNTER FROM must attach a oopy of the letter and
8:00�:001MONDAY-FRIDAY. praof in the fortn of en aff�davit of
mailing, that the collocation protoc:d
IF MORE THAPI 4 PEOPLE ARE EXPECTED 70 ATTEND THE W��mpleted (see Section 18.798.080
PRE-APP4�CA7'10N CONFERENCE IN YOUR GROUP, PLEASE of tt,e Tigard Community Deve�op��►t
1NFORM THE C17Y IN ADVANCE SO THAT ALTERNAI'E ROOM Code}.
ARRANGEMENTS CAN B� MADE TO ACCOMMODAT� THE � Fi�ing pee�296.00 '
��! � '� ure,moc.� MeT�� c.��'� G-�vc� �
v'G p t�Ge c,,,;4l. ba� cvl�'f" ��v�(
G�(c( Se co�vc� 6 ax G� �Uc�f'
Pre-Apps (CD Meetings) _ oe�embe�zoo4 � �
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
'i 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
Tuesday, December 07, 2004 �
s:oo
8:30
9:00 Pre-app '
9:30
10:00 Pre-app appt Peter Fry 503-274-2744 10685/10655 SW � I
Greenburg
10:30
�
11:00 Pre-app
11:30
12:00
12:30
1:00
1:30
2:00
2:30
3:00
3:30
4:00
4:30
5:00
5:30
6:00
2:19PM Thursday, November 18,2004
''� `St,^ �,',
PortlandMags Detail Report Page 1 of 3
Po rt I a n d M a ps New Search � Mapping � He�
10685 SW GREENBURG RD-TIGARD Explorer � P�rty � Maps � Crime � Census
Summary► � Elevalion� Cia.b.q. I Ha�a.d� w,oto I ProP�rtS� I Wac.. � Sw.. � Tax Map I Transpo.t,tl«, ( Zonino
Property & Location
106'86 10655
10770
10840
http://www.portlandmaps.com/detail.cfm?action=Maps&propertyid=W265253&state_id... 11/12/2004
portlandMaps Detail Report Page 2 of 3
Elevation Map
_ .__ -_ _ -----__
; 100'ELEVATION MAP
I �Less than 100'
^,,
� �100'to 200'
� -200'to 300'
4 ,
i : ��:': Osoo�to aoo�
� '"' °j Q4a0'to 500'
i , >17 �irv;��;
I ' r 0500'to�0'
t�.
' ,� 0 0600'to 700'
� - � � 0 700'to 800'
i �800'to 900'
I
i �900'to 1000'
� �" � �1Q00'to 1100'
�1100'to 1200'
� Q 1200'to 1300'
i
� � � Q 1300'to 1400'
I 01400'to 1500'
: i Q}=1500'
http://www.portlandmaps.com/detail.cfm?action=Maps&propertyid=W265253&state_id... 11/12/2004
� 7 7 • 5
r T T T T T l
. ��
A 3 ' ��
: ! �
� .__.�.,_.___._...._..��,��,��.....__._.__-�.._.._.._ ������,�� _.._. ._ _ •„�„• ���
�� �� � � m
�' I 2. ADD NEW \ � (n
BOX CULVERT � �J,J
� j ��• \ � I
� � � EXTERIOR "� �4 a I
� STORAGE �.�q ����
� . '. � � . . . � � � ; PARKING� �+]�_ \?'� Z 77 Z �I
� �ti �9 mt0
' II ' � ,� ��l�\kF w W W°
g�q w���
��j� �� 2.188 AC.(95,309 SF) � ° \ \ ���p
; ZONE: MUC � � � W 33p I
f' USE: WAREHOUSE � \ � =��Q '
� FLOOR: 33,919 SF � 3. RESTORE \ � Z be�
° �i FAR: 0.356 �- � DRAINAGE DACM �� \ o0
i 10685$.W.GREENBURG RD, � WITH NATURE �~~
� � � . . . �GRASSES AND T � �
� � � AQUATIC . 1 . . � . . . �
� ° �� � SPECIES. i . . .� � \1 O
i �
�Z.059 AC.(89,690 5�" � � m
� . ZONE: MUC
VEGETATION , USE: WAItEMOUSE I I � I
i ,F�OOR: 17,735 SF . , . � � I -
� FAR: .198 I' �
F " � - 10555 SW GREENBURG RO. % /J �
�(E)SITE .._..—..—.._.._.. ��' .
(E)SIiE � .._.._..—..—.._.._.._.._..� e ro.w —"�Y
ACCE55 ACCESS �'` ��.a .'p+q a 6 �'
i�__..-._._.._.__._�...�„�.�,-,�-.•s�'u'•[s'fm:i� '.-L�.-:_..-�—.-:_� ._.._.._.._..—.._.._.._..��a / � �� ��' �
^ / � a I ���
METAL ULVERT `�= EXISTING CONDITIONS SITE PLAN � 3� ��� �
WiTH Box 1"=30'-0" '�,
CU WERT. y� '
O �
� 3 �u x
Z °��
� OZ
I
� �G ' a�
W
� �W� o��a
SNEET N0.
A1.0
L 1 1 1 1 1 J
3 7 3 � 5 i
I
f ,
, `
, �-; �` ' L /
�' �
+ ��iyr �, ` . �� � � � . �. . � . � � /
�ZL I w . ..,• -++.,_ �-I �
,;i � ''1 ;� _ � '� p„''k°,�« �r�
_ - � � ' �����
x,��. :;r� +'� , ;
z : .
S� s � { •;} � � � ' � �y s
�� �y � , v'r�tiNNt M i�,.�� � � � . � �� . .,.
� ' �
t \!'-Y �_ . ^'.. .
�,i �Z�. 7 .. - ,
� I r ` \
+ � . �'ly Mx. " u. .. '��r�
- 'w,� 4;. t f� . M �
..
*
..� �, . S .ct.�.:� . . . �� .
.
. � . �' - ' .._ .
L .�
� , � _�' - '►
, : ' .
_� �w
a
�r��� �,
� °�''' '�'
�
� ��� �. �.�.��� " �
� �• a _ 4`��. _ �'_ €: � � �, 1
��'�v�, •9,!. � +`. •_' ' � �`� ,� � y�< ,_'�
� . ,�rx ,z�,�_-4� � ,.�.::1 �' ������\,,,.��\��,�► _'� ,� �
� �' w� . �- �'
,� ,r� �� +� ,
"� . t..
.� * ..}� ��.a..,�: '
*�� rs�¢ �����, -- � - \� '�� r`� �
,�.rr- ', ~ � \.
.�,. ;�,'� . � .- .,,.
..�,' .�� ::�, •{ �!. �"� . . ��� � � ,
.,�, *► '"" ;�`� � � ' ��
.
'.,.,�. �* , :. �Y ,.
�r.;w,� � . I�.D., \ t ti a :,��
�� �s ��> �•'• � � �`. . , Z. ,� � '�
+ . * .,�" '' �,:�e _ ty �1 ',� � � ~ �.�" \ �
, � y,} �,,.. ,_ .� .I"Y. . �'1 �t +1.
�� +.!lS.i`� ���...�.�'"_ ... — 'I�'� � ...� ``..�'^+ `
,* �' '�s. ;� •a" `,�_;Y-. R\
.,�� �i '! a. . .
°_`�?' �
. .
w.�`.�a�, "`wf,"�t', I , � -. .
� 'f � .`• �,�
. �.
- _ ' � `_ ---- ---
-.___ _-- • - -
' � ��"_`' F- -�_ � .
� • ----
. . ,-.• - - - �
� 1 . �'` R � i"� �� ��` � -..� -►...a�. -- ---1!
_ -� � '{ � 'r' .�� �
_ T 1
a y ,_, ' l A ~�
�„�' �� ` , � _ �� �`� � s �� �
. l . �f � � .� ,
1 � ' ' ! t �
` , . � ' f —
�i 4 r�- j.
:r ' y�� �r• T���� �^7 � -.�-.� _-- l
;;� "C , "{ if � - �.:. f
l I a /
.p"�, �•�\ "1 �1 .. ���� � � ��
} � �, r r
! .�y ��R ` I.� � ''��. ,� '�` ; `'� '
9 � � � ���. ` � '�'s�`mr� .S.. F,
{'�� �� � , f J� � r � • t �.`
���.�,��� _ ' •� � � �e� ' ��
� �f;..:� ' � � ,�
,�, , : ,
� � � - . �
�, � .- �.�
- _ � , --- _ -
__ __ �
,� -- : . . .
� AV - __� : . _ f� , . .
�� �
�.r,� i . � . p� .�
� � �. . :� ,� j
_ _ ., ,. .�
� - - _ �_ �
� .,. .�h. - , _ . � . � �.
r ;.�: �-_I r .. .� �
� �` '1�9 � ,,. . ' �,
— .� � `� •..,,r,a� ,�, � , ,� "1 -.�." �� � �
'C� '��^ __ ''"1`l; . n:�., y/�.
!,.
yti � "' . � �I��! .
� �4� •� ,. . � ,�i" '?r�.. ,
` ' ` ��f. � q. - �
, : - �
. .�' ' •`'f� f1► '� � 1 .y+ :,
•� � " ' �'^ ,� � � ,
-� 7-s�`' ' . � �1 v - �� -� ., � �
� � _ � .. -' � �
� �a� ; ���� .,.
,.y < V - .-e�, �
� • Y �
# x'y� r "__n ' , l ++" .
'. �} _� �� �' .�•�'�5 t`��e 1 MX -3�1 !\��
` ,�i.`.
�
p � � '`'` �. 5 \.�. -. .
J�;y�: -._ _. ._ �� � . � " f�.� �� �` ,�
� `�� � � �i -��, ' _��� ..,r... '�
}cF T ,«' •, ,� /
r. ... . .... . .. ..... 4 . .. .. .—_ r/� ' .... .. �
.l '_r-�---�_... �{ . �♦ \\ �
. _ , -
„ AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE
° OF A LAND USE PROPOSAL
. � .
IMPORTANT NOTICE: THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY
A COPY OF THE NOTICE THAT WAS POSTED ON THE SITE.
In the i�latter of the Proposed Land L'se�-�pplicarions for:
Land Use File Nos.: SLR2006-10005/TRE2006-00010
Land Use File Name: LANPHERE ENTERPRISES DRAINAGE WAY RELOCATION
I, Emil� Fng, rlssistant Planner for the Cit� of Tigard, do affirrn that I posted norice of the land use proposal affecting
the land located at � ��" � Qa.•-c1_ �.�'Z(o �� cS� � �Q�.��u�c �
�
W�Z'v�`^ 1 � 3S (�b l a.,.ac , �o-F s Dv�o��- va�c�
and ciici pers�nally post notice of the proposed land use applicauon(s) by means of weatherproof posting in the general
vicinin' of the affected territor��, a copy of said notice being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof,
on the��day of V��. �006.
�
Signature o o e rmed Posting
h:Uo��\pam�\mastcrs\affida��t uf postinR for applicant to pust public hearing.doc
LANPHERE ENTERPRISES DR.AINAGE WAY RELOCATION
SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 2U06-100U5
TREE REMOVAL PERMIT (TRE) 2006-0001U �
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Sensitive Lands Review approval to reroute a drainage
way. The proposed activity would also involve replacing and extending a culvert. The site
includes two tax lots, which are commonly owned. The applicant proposes to move the e�sting
drainage way, which currently separates tax lots 00700 and 00800, to the east property line of
lot 00800. The owner desires to reroute the drainage way to improve water conveyance and use
the two tax lots as a single site. A tree removal permit is required to remove a 7" caliper tree in
the drainage way. LOCATION: 10685 and 10655 SW Greenburg Road; WCTM 1S35BB, Tax
Lots 00700 and 00800.. zONE: MUC: M�ed Use Commercial District. The MUC zoning
district includes land around the Washington Square Mall and land immediately west of Highway
217. Primary uses permitted include office buildings, retail, and service uses. Also permitted are
m�ed-use developments and housing at densities of 50 units per acre. Larger buildings are
encouraged in this area with parking under, behind or to the sides of buildings. APPLICABLE
REVIEW CRITERIA: The approval standards for Sensitive Lands Review are described
Community Development Code Chapters 18.390 (Decision-Making Procedures), 18.510
(Commercial Zoning Districts), 18.630 (Washington Square Regional Center), 18.775 (Sensitive
Lands), and 18.790 (Tree Removal).
Further information may be obtained from the Planning Division �staff contact: Emil� Eng,
Assistant Planner) at 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223, or by calling 503-718-2712
or by email to em�ilv�,tigard-or.gov. A copy of the application and all documents and
evidence submitted by or on behalf of the applicant and the applicable criteria are available for
ins�ection at no cost and copies for all items can also be provided at a reasonable cost.
N�I'ICE TO MORTGAGEE,LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER
TFiE TTGARD DEVELOPMENT O�DE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RE�IVE T�IIS NOTI�,IT SHAII_BE PROMI'TLY FORWARDED TO
THE PURCHASER
NOTICE OF PENDING ,,
LAND USE APPLICATION = � '
SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW � �.�^��
DATE OF NOTIC.E: May 24,2006
FILE NUMBERS: SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW(SLR 2006-10005
TREE REMOVAL PERMIT (TRE� 2006-00010
FILE TITLE: LANPHERE ENTERPRISES DRAINAGE WAY RELOCATION
PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Sensitive Lands Review approval to reroute a drainage way. The
proposed activitywould also uivolve replacing and extending a culvert. The site includes two tax lots,
wiuch are commonly owned. The ap licant proposes to move the e�sting dr�inage way, which
currently separates ta�c lots 00700 and �0800, to the east property line of tax Iot 00800. The owner
desires to reroute the dr�inage way to improve water conveyance and use the two ta�c lots as a single
site. A tree removal pernut�s reqwred to remove a 7" caliper tree in the drainage way.
LOC'.ATION: 10685 and 10655 SW Greenburg Road;WGTM 1S35BB,T�Lots 00700 and 00800.
ZONE: MLJC: Mixed Use Commercial District. The MLJC zoning district includes land around the
Was ' on Square an un�ie � tely west of Highway 217. Primary uses permitted include
office buildin s, retail, and service uses. Also perniitted are mixed-use developments and housing at
densities of 5�units per acre. Larger buildings are encouraged in this area with parking under,behuid
or to the sides of bwldings.
APPLICABLE
RE VIE W
CRITERIA: The approval standards for Sensitive Lands Review are described in CommunityDevelopment Code
Chapters 18.390 (Decision-IVLlking Procedures , 18.510 (Commercial Zonin Districts�, 18.630
(Waslungton Square Regional Center), 18.775 �Sensitive Lands),and 18J90�I"ree Remova�
YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS:
Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written
commenu on the apphcation to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT
5:00 PM ON JLJNE 71'H 2O06 . All comments should be directed to Emil�Eng, Assistant Planner in the Plannin Division at the
Ciry of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard bytelephone at�503) 718-2712.
ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY ?HE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE
SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION-MAHING PROCESS
'I'I� QTY OF TIGARD APPREQATES RECEIVING COM1vIENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COIvIMENTS WILL
BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WIT�-IIN TI� NOTTC� OF DEQSION. A DEQSION ON T�-IIS ISSUE IS
TENTATIVELY SCHEDLJLED FOR jUNE 19, 2006. IF YOU PROVIDE CONIlVIENTS,YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF
T'HE FLJLL DEQSION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED.
WRITTEN COMNIENTS WILL BEQOME A PART OF Tf� PERMANENf PUBLIC REOORD AND SHALL CONTAIN
THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
�
♦ Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" desc�ibed in the section above or any other criteria believed to
be applicable to this proposal;
♦ Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a
response;
♦ Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval
criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue.
Failure of any parry to address the televant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent
appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the
relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence.
AFTER THE 14 DAY COMNfENT PERIOD CLOSES,THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A T�'PE II ADMINISTR�TIVE DECISION. THE
DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCI�TED
WITHIN 5OO FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AIvD TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN CONIIvfENTS OR WHO IS
OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROV.�I,
CRITERIA. B�SED UPON TI3E CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WTI'HIN TEIE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SH.ar.r.
APPROVE,APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PER'�fIT OR ACTION.
SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS:
♦ The applicarion is accepted by the City
♦ Norice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the pYOposed development area allowing a 14-day
written comment period.
♦ The applicarion is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies.
♦ City Staff issues a written decision.
♦ Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners
of record of property located within 500 feet of the site,as shown on the most recent property talc assessment roll; any
City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is
entided to notice under an intergovernmental agteement entered into with the City which includes provision for such
notice or anyone who is otherwise entided to such notice.
INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW:
The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are
contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development
Departtnent. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of$.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service.
Questions xegarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice
under the section titled"Your Right to Provide Written Comments."
i � I «�,i�an�i_ar �
� �L�oo�-lorws '
�__-------_
I ,L�,�IPHERE I
� E.ITERPRISES
I a ��'RELOC_�TION��
I �
�I � _y•,:�� �
�
� �_�� '�i ��
� � � ,...'4 �
,_��:
� ��u' �
,�
� '
� i
0. • I
������ �
nn � i
�
nt a c y �mp
� �, _
NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION
SENSITIVE LANDS RE VIE W(SLR) 2006-10005 '�
LANPHE RE E NTE RPRI SE S
=
DRAINAGEWAYRELOCATION ' ' �
120 DAYS = 9/15/2006
SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY �
FILE NAME: LANPHERE ENTERPRISES DRAINAGEWAY RELO('.ATION
CASE NOS.: Sensitive Lands Review(SLR) SLR2006-10005
Tree Removal Pernzit(TRE) TRE200Er00010
PROPOSAL: The applicant requests a Type II Sensitive Lands Review approval to reroute a drainageway. In
addition, the applicant requests Type I approval to remove three trees (each 7" or less in
diarneter) in the drainageway.
APPLICANT: PeterF.Fry ENGINEER AndrewJtu�sky
2153 SW Maui Stxeet# 105 3305 SW 87`t'Avenue
Portland,OR 97205 Portland,OR 97225
OWNER Lanphere Enterprises
Attn: Bob Lanphere
12520 SW Canyon Road
Beaverton,OR 97005
LOCATION: 10685 and 10655 SW Greenburg Road;WCITVI 1S35BB,Tax Lots 00700 and 00800.
ZONING
DESIGNATION: MUG Mixed Use Corrunercial District. The MLJC zoning district includes land around the
Washington Square Mall and land imrr�ediately west of Highway 217. Prirnary uses perniitted
include office buildings, retail, and service uses. Also pemutted are mixed-use developments
and housing at densities of 50 uruts per acre. Larger buildings are encouraged in this area with
parking under,behind or to the sides of buildings.
APPLICABLE
RE VIE W
CRITERIA: CommurutyDevelopment Code Chapters 18.390, 18.520, 18.630, 18.775 and 18.790.
SECTION II. DECISION
Notice is hereby 'ven that the City of Ti�ard Commuruty Deyelopment Directo�'s desi�nee has
APPROVED the a�ove req�u�est. The fuidin�s and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in
the full decision, available at C:ity Hall.
THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS
FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION.
All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be
obtained for twent�five cents (25�) per page,or the current rate charged for copies at the tune of the request.
SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION
Notice:
Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to:
X The applicant and owners
X Owrier of record within the required distance
X Affected government agencies
Final Decision:
THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON AUGUST 30, 2006 AND
EFFECTIVE ON SEPTEMBER 14, 2006 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED.
�A Ue.al_:
The D�irector's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section
18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tig ard Community
Development, Code wh�ch provides that a written appeal to ether with the re quired fee shall 6e filed with the
Director within ten (10) busuiess days of the date the Notice o�Decision�vas ma�ed. The appeal fee schedule and
forms are available trom the Planrung Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, T"igard, Oregon
97223.
Unless the applicant is the appellant,the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the
specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional
evidence concerning issues.properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submmed by any parry durin_g the appeal
hearing,subject to any addiuonal rules of procedure that maybe adopted from time to tune bythe appellate body.
THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON SEPTEMBER 13, 2006.
�es.tion�s:
For turther inforniatio� n�please contact EmilyEng in the Catyof T'igard Plannin�Division at (503) 639-4171,T"igard
CityHall, 13125 SW HaII Boulevard,Ti�ard, Oregon 97223, or byemail to ErrulvCd�tipard-or.�ov.
q •�.....�i���ron�.��e��r���•
j}, VICINIT'Y MAP
�� --______=
SLR2006-10005
—
LANPHERE
ENTERPRISES
8 DRAINAGE WA
� RELOCATION
\ � `
��� � \
��
`\\ �:����
—i
� �..�w
I .
N
I � �...
������� �
� r,r..�r.�.r.ww r..r r
w r..u..�..+�.....ow...
.� "�='„'
p Ls°
�oorio'a.+ou �
t m°"'�°�.� � j{�+
M31�tl3A03LS "��°'O*�
I �� �y�
G
4 �
����
_--.���v _
�4���
. i _ , . _
� --_------___ _
� � �° �--
� �_� �
�
I �o� �� —
I i
,
� � ,
I � � ��, <
- L
-- - � �°
,
'" — .
' - <4�
�
�
�
��� � ����
J
�y W�� U s � ��� �57���{
O � pj� � � NJg OS
« �'� :
��� d�Y�b
� u �y ��
� p �p� yy�J<
N W2�< < �
�
��
�
. �
, ..
�Z .�C`���- ��C?C��
City of Tigard ��
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
.
Tigard, OR 97223 �
Phone: 503-639-4171
' � �
FAX TRANSMITT�L
Date September 11,2006
Number of pages including cover sheet 3
To: Pam Gassowa�- From: Emily Eng
Co: Co: City of Tigard
Fax#: (415) 485-5796 Fax#: (503�624-3681
Ph#: �503) 718-2712
SUBJECT: Appeal Form
MESSAGE:
Pam,
Here is the appeal form. You can in fact appeal this decision by 9/13 at 5 pm. We would have to
receive the fee (�250) along with the signed applicarion.
If you need assistance with the form,please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Emily Eng
I:�ENG�AlC.DOT
�,
Roger M. Belanich
I���n���� I��o�Q��� DQ�QIlo�����
22020 -17th Ave. S.E., Suite 200, Bothell,Washington 98021 (425)485-4850 or (206)623-6230 FAX (425)483-181 I
September 11, 2006
Emily Eng
City of Tigard Planning Division
Tigard City Hall
13125 SW Hall Boulevard
Tigard, Oregon 97223
RE: Appeal
Lanphere Enterprises Drainage Way Relocation
SLR2005=10005
TRE2005-00010
Dear Emily:
The culvert located on the NE corner of my property accepts drainage from the 36 inch ODOT
pipe plus the drainage from the neighboring property—tax lot 700 and north. As I discussed in
my June 1 letter (see attached). Upon further investigation I find that neither the ODOT nor the
properties to the north have an easement for their storm drain water to cross through my
property. I have enclosed a copy of the special exceptions from our Title Report.
Currently flooding occurs on my property when we have heavy rains—water from the drainage
off the ODOT pipe and the properties north. This flooding continually does damage to my
property and makes access to the drive lane and parking impossible in the flooded area —the
water sometimes backs up the tenant's back door and the water so deep it comes to the top of a
car's door.
The City has allowed development in the area but has not provided adequate storm drainage.
Allowing the storm drainage system to flow thru private property into a wetland that is privately
owned and not maintained by the City is an indication of the lack of planning and maintenance
by the City. Improvements need to be made immediately.
The proposed plan is NOT going to solve the drainage problem and the flooding will continue to
occur on my property. The City's plan is NOT acceptable!
Please notify me of the hearing date as I would like to attend the hearing.
Very trul rs,
Roger M. Belani h
�,
Order No: 241433
DESCRIPTION
(Continued)
GENERAL EXCEPTIONS (Standard Coverage Policies only)
1. a. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any
taxing authority that l.evies taxes or assessments on real property or by the
public records.
b. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or
notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency
or by the public records.
2 . a. Easements, liens, encumbrances, interests or claims thereof which are not
shown by the public records.
b. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public
records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or by
making inquiry of persons in possession thereof.
3 . Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or
any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown
by the public records .
4. a. Unpatented mining claims;
b_ Reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance
thereof;
c. Water rights, claims or title to water;
whether or not the matters excepted under (a) , (b) , or (c) are shown by the public
records.
5. Any lien or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter
furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records.
Order No: 241433
SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS
� 6. City liens, if any, of the City of Tigard. (An inquiry has been directed to the
City Clerk concerning the status of said liens and a report will follow if such
liens are found. )
7. The premises herein described are within and subject to the statutory powers
including the power of assessment of Clean Water Services.
8 . Limited access provisions contained in Deed to the State of Oregon, by and
through its State Highway Commission, which provides that no right or easement of
right of access to, from or across the State Highway other than expressly therein
provided for shall attach to the abutting property,
Recorded: November 9, 1964
Book: 529
Page: 491
9. An easement created by instrument, including terms and provisions thereof.
Dated: November 1, 1972
Recorded: November 2, 1972
Book: 895
Page: 323
In Favor Of: Southerly adjacent property owners
For: Ingress
Affects: the Southerly portion of Parcel I
10. Agreement, including the terms and provisions thereof;
Dated: August 19, 1983
Recorded: November 22, 1983
Recorder' s Fee No. : 83043069
By and Between: United States Bakery, an Oregon corporation and Roger M.
Belanich
11 . Declaration of Perpetual Easements for Motor Vehicle Ingress and Egress,
including the terms and provisions thereof;
Dated: December 20, 1984
Recorded: January 30, 1985
Recorder' s Fee No. : 85003562
12 . Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restriction for Common Party Wall and
Utility Easement, including the terms and provisions thereof;
Dated: December 20, 1984
Recorded: January 30, 1985
Recorder' s Fee No : 85003563
(Continued)
�
Order No: 241433
SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS (Continued)
13 . Trust Deed, including the terms and provisions thereof, given to secure an
indebtedness with interest thereon and such future advances as may be provided
therein;
Dated: September 3, 1996
Recorded: September 25, 1996
Recorder' s Fee No. : 96086116
Amount: $482, 000. 00
Grantor: Roger M. Belanich, a married man as to his sole and
separate property
Trustee: Chicago Title Insurance Company of Oregon, an Oregon
corporation
Beneficiary: Standard Insurance Company, an Oregon corporation
Loan No. : 96072201
A portion of the beneficial interest under said Trust Deed was assigned by
instrument;
Recorded: February 26, 2001
Recorder's Fee No. : 2001014891
To: Equitable Life Insurance Company of Iowa, an Iowa
corporation as to an undivided 95% interest.
14 . Assignment of Lessor's Interest in Leases given as additional security to the
Trust Deed shown next above;
Dated: September 3, 1996
Recorded: September 25, 1996
Recorder' s Fee No. : 96086117
To: Standard Insurance Company, an Oregon corporation
A portion of the secured interest thereunder was assigned by instrument;
Recorded: February 26, 2001
Recorder' s Fee No. : 2001014891
To: Equitable Life Insurance Company of Iowa, an Iowa
corporation as to an undivided 95% interest.
15. Lease, including the terms and provisions thereof.
Dated: October 24, 1983
A memorandum of which was:
Recorded: May 19, 1986
Recorder' s Fee No. : 86020800
Lessor: Roger M. Belanich, his separate estate
Lessee: The Southland Corporation, a Texas corporation
Affects: Parcel I
The lien of the above Lease was subordinated to the lien of the Trust Deed shown
as Exception 13 above, by instrument:
Recorded: September 25, 1996
Recorder' s Fee No: 96086119
(Continued)
�
Order No: 241433
SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS (Continued)
16. The rights of tenants, as tenants only under unrecorded leases, as disclosed in
instruments of record, as follows:
� Shears Ahead, Inc. , an Oregon corporation
William and Cheryl Winfree
The rights of said tenants were subordinated to the trust Deed shown as
Exception No. 13 above, by instruments;
Recorded: September 25, 1996
Recorder' s Fee No: 96086120
And:
Recorded: September 26, 1996
Recorder' s Fee No. : 96086622
The present ownership of said leasehold and other matters affecting the interest
of the lessee are not shown herein.
17. Proof that there are no parties in possession, or claiming to be in possession,
other than above vestees.
18 . Any statutory liens for labor or material, including liens for contributions due
to the State of Oregon for unemployment compensation and for workmen' s
compensation, which have now gained or hereafter may gain priority over the lien
of the insured mortgage, which liens do not now appear of record.
NOTE: Taxes for the fiscal year 2001-2002, paid in full;
Amount: $4,890.49
Levy Code: 023=81
Property ID No. : R1346476
Map No. : 1S135BC
Tax Lot No. : 00201 (Affects Parcel I)
NOTE: Taxes for the fiscal year 2001-2002, paid in full;
Amount: $11, 549. 96
Levy Code: 023-81
Property ID No. : R1346485
Map No. : 1S135BC
Tax Lot No. : 00202 (Affects Parcel II)
NOTE: Property address is identified as:
10763-10765 SW Greenburg Road
Tigard, Oregon
END OF RF.PORT
JMF/j mf
February 19, 2002
�
Order No: 241433
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PARCEL I :
A tract of land located in the Northwest quarter of Section 35, Township 1 South,
Range 1 West of the willamette Meridian, in the County of Washington and State of
Oregon, and being more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Graham Donation Land Claim No. 52, in Section
35, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridia�, in the County of Washington
and State of Oregon; thence North along the West line of said Donation Land Claim, 16
chains to a stone marked with "X" (a measured course of North 1°39'30" West, 1055.72
feet to a point) ; thence South 89°49' 00" East along the South line of the Olson Tract
as described in Book 304, Page 99, Deed Records of said county; 581.24 feet (a
measured distance of 582. 08 feet) to the West line of the Quinn Tract, Book 366, Page
4; thence North 00°11' 00" East along said Quinn Tract and its Northerly extension,
179.65 feet; thence South 89°49' 00" East 48.37 feet to the true point of beginning;
thence continuing South 89°49' 00" East, 27.32 feet; thence South 58°59' 19" East, 17.39
feet; thence South 31°00'41" West, 7.89 feet; thence North 76°00'41" East, 60. 00 feet;
thence South 58°59' 19" East, 74 . 00 feet; thence South 45°59' 19" East, 39.76 feet to
the Northwesterly right-of-way line of SW Greenburg Road as acquired by the State of
Oregon by Final Judgement entered in Suit No. 26-949, Washington County Circuit Court
and recorded in Deed Book 529, Page 491, Book 527, Page 511, Deed Records; thence
North 31°00'41" East along said Northwesterly right-of-way of SW Greenburg Road, 80.24
feet to the Westerly right-of-way line of the Frontage Road Exit from Beaverton-Tigard
Highway, as acquired by the State of Oregon and recorded in Deed Book 529, Page 491,
said Deed Records, said point located 30 feet from and opposite to engineer's
centerline station "FR" 357 + 72.20 POC; thence on a 130.00 foot radius curve to the
right, which has a chord that bears North 35°30' 09" West, 58.06 feet, an arc distance
of 58 .55 feet; thence North 89°49' 00" West 99.34 feet to the Northeast corner of the
structural wall of Building I of the partition map attached to that Deed Recorded as
Recorder' s Fee No. 85003564, Washington County Deed Records; thence continuing North
89°49' 00" West along the approximate center of said structural wall, 64. 92 feet to the
Northwest corner thereof; thence South 00°11' 00" West 0.63 feet; thence North
89°49' 00" West, 31.60 feet; thence South 00°11' 00" West, 48. 97 feet to the true point
of beginning.
PARCEL II :
A tract of land located in the Northwest quarter of Section 35, Township 1 South,
Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the County of Washington and State of
Oregon, and being more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Graham Donation Land Claim No. 52, in Section
35, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, in the County of Washington
and State of Oregon; thence North along the West line of said Donation Land Claim, 16
chains to a stone marked with ��X�� (a measured course of North 1°39'30" West, 1055.72
feet to a point) ; thence South 89°49' 00" East along the South line of the Olson Tract
as described in Book 304, Page 99, Deed Records of said county, 581.24 feet (a
measured distance of 582.08 feet) to the West line of the Quinn Tract, Book 366, Page
4; thence North 00°11' 00" East along said Quinn Tract line and its Northerly
extension, 179.65 feet to the true point of beginning; thence South 89°49' 00" East,
48 .37 feet; thence North 00°11' 00" East, 48.97 feet; thence South 89°49' 00" East,
31.60 feet to a point on the West face of the structural wall of Building I of
partition map attached to that Deed recorded as Recorder's Fee No. 85003565,
Washington County Deed Records; thence North 00°11'00" East, 0.63 feet; thence South
�
Order No: 241433
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
89°49' 00" East along the North face of the North structural wall for said Building I
and its Easterly projection, 164 .26 feet to the Westerly right-of-way line of the
Frontage Road Exit from Beaverton-Tigard Highway, as acquired by the State of Oregon
and recorded in Deed Book 529, Page 491, said Deed Records; thence on a 130.00 foot
radius curve to the right, which has a chord that bears North 3°56' 04" East, 116. 15
feet; an arc distance of 120.41 feet to the North line of the Olson Tract as described
in Book 304, Page 99, Deed Records of said county; thence North 89°49' 00" West, along
the North line of said Olson Tract; 251.83 feet to an intersection with the Northerly
extension of the West line of the Quinn Tract as described in Book 366, Page 4, Deed
Records of said county; thence South 00°11`00" West along the West line and its
extension of said Quinn Tract, 165.50 feet to the true point of beginn.ing.
�
' - i s i as es 1
\
N •1'1!�• IOt►.t / �
��5.!! US9 0 � �
n�oo Q ' za�.s� esa.s�
202 � to` — — — ' sxso / ,�✓
R' 300 •s,9'A� � ' � - � / �
�a •T
,CC- "' Lt3 AC. ��/ - � �01
n 1 /
" �� �:'�� 7�
/ ��.�, \ /
� ai.00 iea.t� ;'�
" / ?35IAC. ICS. 21,416) � v «'►
- 7.YP
i • �..
_ o
' = 2�r��-*0 N 16°��f �
�
��+, ° .TOAC.. ''` ti Y
� 1 .. � � •
'�'' �,,ry ioo ��., +'".
.66,OC. � �
'�ao�p — — i,ao _ _ �� � s° �d
M � +
\� 197.�9 20.7 ;�j= f ,p ? .!
O ! /
�. ���; � casr.aoE � �•., - .� ,�'.
,_ �" �— _�d.•,c,c R • °'° �
s�-S�o�n s.s�
r�7'b7 l •� 209.92 T �h . .S 132.56 � � �til N
9'/)0 � �� �6-1994 si_asio� � ��C.�.
�, � = 9� 2�"$! '�.,_�,z�, AVE N U E� x
I � ?.13AC. , � �ae� � � a 7
'q J�
`M I i I �% % �o SEE MAP
;J- �i � y� + �S � ��
• W M 6►'+0
I ,
,s N ( ,��� p'A
• e�' O y0
I o
` M' r I + � OA�'��
� r c�NCe��[o r�■ �o�s
�a',ss � _ (a _, _ o I �r1 � 4� ,00,�oo,
M ��•s:'w :�1.as" •o
` I s H•�r �� � t�o.��
\� I �
`" n 1000 I t�
� o i2s,ur. oti
w � '� r•
\DI w � �Y
C _� � ,
� M � •
i �0
0
I \ � i1t
�� �p�l1�� � �� �• �
I ` �
0
i
_ 't70 J .- �t l'
o _ -
_
� 2�l.�.1 tts .
. r �:.w Sz.4s �� :.a� �-.
{ H �I��� [ 11�.�1 'L� ►V Y �
« ^ 1001 �paEErw �� i~. �--
w A .I/Ae. �
:. « ss��7 � . M 1������ j r�/
t���� � ~ Z fOR AS5ES5MENT PURPOSES ONLY
--`-�— •'� w �W DO N07 RELY ON FOR ANY OTHER USE
�
I 100 , � (!�
t.l? Ae.
�o
� CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
r
1u C 2 n
� _ � Map number � J �J S u�
r`si:• �+'n '�' 'r'�� This plat is for your aid in locating
I your land with reference to streets and
� r „ others parcels• While this plat is
� I: L believed to be correct, the company
e �;� assumes no liability for any loss
�;' �w .,N occurring by reason of reliance
s
w I� thereon•
: �
' 3305 SW 87tn
Portland, OR 97225
Flowingsul��ti�>>�� (503)297-6311P
f ��C E i!��D �503)297-6053F
i �
�� AUG 0 4 2006
July 28, 2006
CITY OF TIGARD
°LANNING/ENGIN�ERlNG
Emily Eng, Assistant Planner
City of Tigard, Planning Division
13125 SW Hall Blvd
Tigard, OR 97223
RE: Lanphere Enterprises Drainage Way Relocation.
Sensitive Lands Review (SLR) 2006-10005
Dear Emily:
This letter will address comments and concerns provided during the public review process. The
comments indicated flooding currently occurs in the project are and approval of this project
should not increase these problems.
The project site and surrounding area are very low gradient. The drainage pathways are
adjacent to a low gradient creek, which is connected to a low gradient river. This combination
results in poor conveyance during high rain fall events. As our project cannot address
conveyance downstream, we have developed an approach to minimize impact by providing
detention on-site. By providing maintaining existing conveyance and providing detention we will
improve conditions over the current situation.
At time of future site redevelopment, the site stormwater concept will be implemented. This will
include rerouting the upstream pipes, addition of treatment swales and other required upgrades.
The box culvert being installed now, will become the detention chamber in the future, to
attenuate downstream and upstream flooding.
The following is a detailed explanation of our additional study of the area.
SUMMARY
The question has been raised as to the impact of enclosing the ditch on surrounding properties.
Specifically, the concern of overflow to the adjacent strip mall has been raised. Historically, the
existing ditch periodically overflows, flooding the parking lot of the strip mall. The proposed
drainage system will increase the flow capacity as well as the storage capacity of the system,
alleviating the flooding issues experienced currently.
As shown in the attached figures, the existing ditch has a flow capacity of approximately 14cfs,
flowing full. When this volume of water is introduced to the existing system, overflow onto
adjacent properties is imminent, if not already occurring. The proposed 3'x6' concrete box
culvert has capacityto pass in excess of 2000cfs. Thus it is apparent that the proposed system
has capacity to pass flows well in excess of those currently experienced. It is important to
recognize that while the proposed system has this capacity, no additional runoff will be
introduced into the system. Runoff from the project site will be collected and treated in a
� 3305 SW 87tn
Portland, OR 97225
Flowing�� �j1lflr�lt� (503) 297-6311P
� (503)297-6053F
!�
'��
separate system, leaving this proposed box culvert as the primary means of conveyance for the
runoff from the existing ODOT system.
The existing ditch is classified as "very weedy and sluggish"for purposes of assessing flow
efficiency. The proposed concrete culvert is very smooth and, therefore much more efficient in
the passage of runoff. While this will protect the adjacent strip mall from overflow issues, it has
the potential for a negative impact on the downstream wetland area, as the volume of water will
reach the wetland with greater velocity. In order to mitigate this potential impact, a permeable
rock berm will be constructed at the outlet of the proposed culvert. When constructed at a height
of 9.5", this berm will provide storage capacity within the proposed culvert that matches the
volume of the existing ditch, at top of bank (±1300cfl. A berm height of 10.9"will provide an
additional 200cf of storage in order to ensure that the current overflow volume is
accommodated. This permeable rock berm will allow water to seep through at a rate that does
not exceed the rate of discharge from the existing ditch system.
The two measures outlined above will ensure that the proposed system will be adequate to
contain and convey the existing flow capacity of the current system with no negative impacts on
downstream properties. Please see the attached drawing,which detail the proposed system,
and attached support calculations.
If you have any questions, or need clarification, please contact me at(503) 297-6311.
Sincerely,
Andrew Jansky, P.E., M.S. ��D PROFFS
Principal ���5fi`��u� sio�
Flowing Solutions, LLC � ���
www.flowingsolutions.com , ^ ,
,�C,i.w��,c.�
ort�
� �yM� ,�
- �'�'�REW JPNy
DlPIRES:6/30%.�l
. . , ' 1
- Ii�-9,/Er[-m.J Hv.�A rcN tu�vE� o�,u�, s5� 7•Z$•ob
�y ;
C2oSS - SEC'��oN f
1 I D a AG-Gru�vE4
;
�
�
Exisri� ` oN1,f ;
G�ua� �__ i
,..
1bD.p ' , ,
��
�P,�Po50 3"�E6� ;�
GpNUC.�� $a X
9 D.0
CR�SS -sEC.r'ia.Jf�` R4_C--A OF y(e.e�os� cuc.vE-K-'r = �$. O Sf'
FLowrnl(r
O bJ .ff�flct.
CR.�ss-S�naa�� 3.9 sF I O. ! sF
2.EA OF D��N
NET /NC.R,�9SE 1lI.I SF 7. g S�F
�i.J fLEA
f
i
'
�
I
, - . . � Z�y ;
- ..,r rroa� �k�� �o�u � .z��o-E.
GtL�55 5 E�n a�J �
//D.O
AG GWW E�.
G�c isT.aG 0 F��
�� � '
l00.� �`y,
\ �.
P�oPas� 3' fL�
Ge,�cA� aox
90,o
G�SS-SEr.�rconl E}t AR.G-N mF ?2oras�a �u��Ee-'r = !$.D s'�i°
��wi,�1G
O N�W r-ue.�
GF-oss•SFcnoa
OF AitGlf S y S F /$,/ S�
,v�-r- �a cn.B� /8.p s� a.9 sF
a �ri�a
- � � � 3�y
�.�-p �� Ut�U� VOL4 � �'�'��
�J�� gc� oF a,rc� = `/7 sf
c.�,w�-� oF a��, - 2 7�;
VOc-umE o� EXfsT/Nb Dl�+`� ` I292. T C� -r /30P CF
I�2f-9 OF 3i�6� �o�JGfi.¢fL� Cuc-JS�-'r ` I$.a Sf
C-1Ctlrrr'7f D� 3 j(6 �GOe1LR.�T� L'UC.✓�-1�'r � Z�
c-��.-
{��i�C.4/+n E dF p2�P83�� GU411�2-T - y95a « .
r�ET i rJ GR.F�fl-s E %r�l .�o�.0 r►, E �p w p aa Pa s� cu�vslc-T o J�'R- :
&s�sr�,�y� a��tr ; 365t7 rf � 2�D% oF �s�aG �D�um E
7N� P�ip�s L�a 3'�6'�z7r' r.oa u�l E a oX Gu c.✓Ei-r dsAs :MOR-� r7fan,t.,2,s 77i►�+Fs
GA�Pec rry oF rbE e�c�s n�►� .��rGt�. 7J��5 ��Jc2-6�� ���Tr s/�nu c.D S�GrE
T� �cc-EJ,9� rl}� �c-��i�G isst!�s cAu s� s Y � o✓64�-��•1 r7lain �fc
Ex,snN � a�rt�.
��y
. . • ' � ID�rG►�]�ue.u6�7 ✓o�k.y,1rS �i_ 7•2..r�•�]6
o�E� �rs��Exr F��.,, : "J�ey .wc-� Y 9ub s�u sc-�sw " m�a,,�G�.s � � o,llZ
�f�am i3ES S�G� D�5'/�nJ r�AtJN A-L : C/�-49�2�' 8,
�!5/e,/G /�tAr�+n1��lGS EQur�r�p�v ;
i'ygG A- 2 Z/z s �iZ
t� = n
�►rr rr ��..�i,�� �u._;
n= o.�i2
�_ 5�.7 sF ' �/ y 7
�Z= a�ys R- w� ��c.i,r c�� = ,o,s. � o� Ys
S � O,?6 °lo �
a r b�l t 2 ��1�7��D,yS�2/3�D•76���''' �,/3.9 Z.._��s�.
MA-x ��w TH¢,au6F► EX+SriaG D��y : Q�= r3,9Z cPS
Gu�v�r' �.ow��G �c.c. ;
n = O, b/� w.p
3 T
� = Id�O sf
2 = !,S �L= ��wr = ��2 =/.S : 6f3�s � /Z
$ � O.�6 (Fc.o�a�a G �...H�y';R.«
Q = @ pg� ��S�C/.S�y��p,76�f� = Z�`l�u7. OS
m<}x Fc-ow T7f¢r�u�� �wP�D 3a� cu�✓6'rc.�r : C��� 2o3�•�scFs
NEf /NCR-E9sE i�1 cAr�c.�r7� ; Q,� ` 4>E = Zr9Z� cFs
7� �3uR-� �4AEQk�9-7'Zr 3r7��+5-G� ✓o�un,E, ��,�a y�E��bN's' c� T3L�-^'+ :
�Jr L 1�J� 4=L7� �
�7� w=6 �
f � J= f 30 o c� C�,�..,�
�-t �
y d._ �_ = 1- 3ao ,. d,7�' � - q,S "
1 (Z�sX6) �
�
If�41v1A� T-'�C-T27R- 6F SA�L�1"f : J= /SCA cf�
i�
/$b o
d.= Z�s 6 " a�9� ' ro,9 "
I
�
� Beaverton Honda, 10685 SW Greenburg Rd, water quality swale calculations
Using CWS design and construction criteria:
Water quality event = 0.36" of rain in 4 hours with a return period of 96 hours
Calculate water quality volume (WQ� and water quality flow (WQF) as follows:
WQV(cf) - 0.36(in)xArea(sf)
12(in/ft)
and;
WQF(cfs) - WQVcf
14400s
NO BUILDINGS OR PAVING IS PROPOSED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. WORK
WILL IS IN PREPERATION FOR FUTURE IMPROVEMETNS THAT WILL INTEGRATE
STORMWATER TREATMENT AND DETENTION. THE FOLLOWING ARE
ESTIMATED AREAS FOR FUTURE WORK.
�
Total impervious area draining to the proposed future water quality facility = 36,300sf
pavement + 29,OOOsf roof area = 65,300sf
Therefore the water quality volume for this site:
WQv _ 0.36"x65300sf) _ �959cf
12(in/ft)
and;
�QF, _ 1959cf _0.136cfs (say 0.14cfs)
14400s
In order to treat this volume in a constructed water quality wetland: (CWS appendix B)
1. Permanent storage = 0.55WQV= 1077.5cf
2. Water quality detention volume = 1.OxWQV= 1959cf
Using a trapezoidal channel with a top width (a) of 15', a depth of 1' and 3:1 side slopes;
the following table indicates the storage volume for design depths in a 195' channel.
h (ft) a(ft) b(ft) A(s� L(ft) Vol (cfl
0.40 11.40 9.00 4.08 195.00 795.60
0.50 12.00 9.00 5.25 195.00 1023.75
0.52 12.12 9.00 5.49 195.00 1070.78
0.53 12.18 9.00 5.61 195.00 1094.48
0.86 14.16 9.00 9.96 195.00 1941.97
0.87 14.22 9.00 10.10 195.00 1969.64
1.00 15.00 9.00 12.00 195.00 2340.00
Using a minimum depth of 0.53' and a maximum of 0.87'for detention, the required
orifice would be 0.01".
The overflow weir elevation would be set at 1.0' above the bottom of the channel.
��.� 5����0�
TLAND LAND USE NOTIFICATIO )RM
(this fortn is to be com�teted onlv by planning department staff for mapped wetlands/waterways)
DEPARTMENT OF STATE LANDS WETLANDS PROGRAM
775 Summer Street NE, Suite 100; Salem, OR 97301-1279; (503} 378-3845
1. County: W as��►�.e� �av` Local Case File#: � Z�� - �oc�d5
City: � i�Car� DSL File#: WN - ] (completed bv DSL Staftl
Responsible Jurisdiction: �City ❑ County DSL Project#: ��5�p5 (comvleted bv DSL Staffl
2. APPLICANT: P� �-t �. ��� . LANDOWNER: � � �-e 'se-�
nameZ l S 3 S 1n� V��V► St na��- �-c� $LJ Cp,y,,.,�N,,,e..�
mailing address � l� r mailing address
J
mailing address mailing address
�Q,�rt.c�-.��� c5� �.�1� (�«�.�„ , c�F�U Q1V1NG
S _ ca,��{ZiP .a��( � _ city,state zip
� v 3� � II IAI��z���
phone phone
3. LOCATION
T l S R_,� s 5 �3� �i< Tax Lot(s) ��� a�t��c��GARD
Address (streedcity) � C�C��� e�.�„ �1 (p b S S� �tJ ��e L hl�ur� (l��T`� .�d �►.�lz.Z�
NWI quad map name
Attach all the following(with site marked): LWI NWI Map (if no LWI map) •Parcel Map .Site Plan(if any)
If applicable attach: ❑Other
4. SIT� INFORMATION
LW1/NWI Wetland Classification Codes(s)
Adjacent Waterway(if any) �1 c�v� / �ta 4- C.��12 �y. Zoning f'�,u L
5. PROPOSED ACTIVITY �'U�^'`�`�
❑site plan approval ❑subdivision
❑ grading permit ❑planned unit development
❑conditional use pernut ❑building permit(new structures)
�Other S�S i�+� ��-� «c-..�.� n�,rc�Q � re rb� � a �„�
Project Description �a-�
Completed by/Contact C'.i Q f l� Date ai a-ex�co
Address � 3�Z5 sW 1-{�1.� ��_ 1�c � CSf�_ �1'1._.Z Phone: (So3) - 'Zl
/ DSL RESPONSE '
❑ A removal-fill permit is required from the Department of State Lands
❑ A removal-fill pernut will be required when the development project proceeds
❑ A removal-fill permit may be required
❑A permit may be required by the Corps of Engineers(503-808�373)
❑Information needed includes:
❑ A wetland determination/delineation report(Consultants list enclosed)
❑
�State Permit#_ 3?j �was issued r
❑No removal-fill permit is required for the described project if/because:
Comments:
❑ On-Site Visit By: Date:
Response completed by: Date: !p
* If the project is changed t volve fill or moval from the wetlands area,a state removal-fill permit ili be required.
http://www.oregonstatelands.us/wetlanduse.htm August 2004
_ �
. �
, �
_ '" � (fl
LANPHERE ENTERPRISES
CU LVERT REPLACEM ENT �iTY O� TIGI�FS�i
;pproved................. • o
.. ........................................ ... : � J
� .
:,r;dit+onall A
; ; � " Y PProved.----- ..... [ x, � �
��� 'y ` ', �_ �_� 1�685 SW GREENBURG ROAD �FRMITNpWOrkasdescribedin: W om �
SI�IALLEN ' � ' � �
_ �
_.._.. ____ _
� � �-__, _ � ..� Letter to. ......... .�......... '
:„ , . F011ow z o
� TIGARD, OREG�N �: � � � �
; ' , Attach...............__..__ ....... i � w
� �` ` -
�' .. �.__� , ,�.�h lddres :-
', sw oEI�K ... , � ;; � O� O
__ ----_I�ata•. _ �`L�-�� W �� .
SW y+U�T r _. , , �� ' ra � 1 <' -
�� J
_.�-,,,,___-`-- ;' ���C�� � �p,�' � sw M ULT MO MAH �� �
__.� �.-
� � �`��y��� � S E N ITIVE LAN D REVI EW B � m� � m
�� � v�' S � U M I T T A L
� �°'r SITE LUCATIC�N ; W� �
,-.
sw eRO ukK , . ,� . �
� ;.
,.
--�--... ,_ r ...,� � rr � s� . ' ; �
i
� ,
. ��F� . . . ._. !
z 21)���� `'"��( � _ � �pq
r � ���' F�,T,T
� _ � :.. i'��
; ,.
� i �t ���
y�r � �., �t� � i � ' ' .= ��
.;.__ g '�'�` GENERAL NOTES � �
_ ,.
�. � ' ; ..� - r;` CONSTRUCTION NOTES ����
..•-J'�'r.."'� T� �d 7�'8.��_2. � . m i
f � r _ � 1. ALL ELEVA710N5 ARE BASFD ON AN ASSIClIm AR&1RARY DAIUY AS 511011M ON PLAN 1. 1HE CON7RAC7�OR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DENOU710N AND DISPOSAL OF
! � � ,, N'� �T. DOSlINC A.C.. CURBS.SIDEMALKS AND 07/1EN 97E EI.OdDITS MA7NN 1HE 97E AREA.
'� �� ' [�n' -_-„ l � ��+.!r p I p 2 STA710NING IS BASfD UPON Cdl7ERIJNE UNLESS 07HERWISE N07ED. CONd71011 OR BETiER.
N.L LAN�SCAPIMG. CURBS AND SIDEMMLKS SHALL BE REPLACEO TD THOR ORIqNAL
; z
` � �f 3. ALL CONS7Rl1C710N AND MAIERIAL SHAl1 CODIFORM TO iMESE PLANS AIO THE APPLICABLE
.i 3��' . REQUIREAIEN75 OF TI1E 1901 OREGON CMAPTER UNIFORIA PLLNIBNG CODE AND 2 SUBGRADE AW 7RENCN BACIffIL1 SMALL BE COYPACTED TO AT LEAST GSf[OF iFIE
. � •� , ?� i __._ REWIRQIENTS OF Ti�dTY OF TICARD PUBUC NIPROVENENT DESIGN STANDARDS NAIOYW DRY DEN517Y AS DEIERY�Im BY AS7U D-E9& FLOODMG OR,ET71NG THE
`� 8',�p�.� � ui: BAd(FNlm 7RENCFIES MI7H WAIER IS NOT PERNITTED.
'�i Y� 4. THE CONPLETED INSTALLA710H $HALL CONFORY TO ALL APPLICABLE fEOERAL,STA1E, AND ��
LOCAL COOES, ORDINANCES AND RECULATIONS MICLUDING NECESSARY PERIM75 AND 3. FN.LS SHALL BE PLACED MI 9�-1Y LOOg LIF15 ANU COMPAC7ED TO A DRY ��
MISPECrONS REWIREO BY THE GOVERHMG AUTMORInES. DDISIn OF AT IEAST�OF 7HE MOpi�p PROCTOR MA�UM DRY OENSIN
5. TFE CONIRACTOR SMALL BE RESPON9BLE FOR COORDINATNG ALL SCHEDULJNG AND ALL (ASTND-66E) IM7HIN BUILDMG AND 1M1HN1 Y DEP7H OF ANY PAVEYDIT SECTIOH. �,
LOCATC�R MAP �K WITM TME ONMER. 4. TNE CONIRACTOR S1iALL ESTABLISH UNE AND CRADE Fqt 1HE SiORM AND �
SAMTARY SEMiER PIPE BY 1NE USE OF A LASER.
6. �CAVATORS MUST COMPLY WITN ALL PROVISIONS OF ORS 757.541 TO 757.57 INCLUaNG
NOTFlCATION OF ALL PFR7INENT COMPANIES OR ACQiCES OF UNDERGROUND U111JTIES MI 5. SAWCUT STRAIGHT MATCHLINES TO CREATE A BUTT JqNT BE7WEOJ OOSIING
p� THE PROJECT AREA AT LEIIST�N BUSINESS-DAY HOURS,BUT NOT MORE 7HAN 10 PAVEMENT AND NEW PAVEtAfNT.
; BUSpJE55 DAYS, 50 TMAT SAID U11L171E5 MAY BE ACCURA7ELY LOCATEU BEFORE
� COMMENqNG ANY DfCAVATION. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL PREVENT SEDIMpJTS FROM ENIERMIG 1HE STORM URAINACE
� SYS7EM.
p 7. TFIE LOCATIDN OF DUS7ING UNDERGROUND UTNJ7IES SHOMM ON 1}�PLANS IS FOR
S INFORIAATION ONLY ANO IS NOT CUARANTEm 70 BE COMPLEIE OR ACIX1ftATE OONiitACTOR 7. ADJUST ALL INCIDENTAL 31RUC7UItES. YANHOLE UDS. VALVE BOXES. ETC. TO
0 w�" ° , s : SMALL VERIFY ELEVA710MS. PIPE 9ff. AND YATERIAL TYPE OF All UNDER(XtWND U1IUTIES FN11SHm GRADE.
_ . , PwoR ro cou►�►raHC w�n+ co►rsmuctaN �►io s►u�u e�c urr asca��►�aes ro n+e
j , �''-G+1�"a 1 7. ATTFN110N OF FLOWING SO1U710M5. 72 HOURS PRIOR TO START OF CONS7RUC710N. 8. �IALS. TRENCH EI(CAVATIdI. PIPE LAYING AND HAdCFlLL EXCAVATI[NS
,�- �.._�
,-_...- .
_ `�.��--r. -
� �, I �1
y ��: , s & 1HE ENdNEEFt OR OMMER IS NOT RESPOM9BLE FOR THE SAFE7Y OF iHE CON7RAC70R OR 9. TIE CONTRACTdt SlIALL PROVIDE ALL MATERIALS AND LABQt TO COMPLETE
_. _........._ > .,-., � HIS CREW. ALL O.SH.A. REGULA710N5 SHALL BE S7RICILY ADIIERm TO IN 7HE TIE WUtIC FOR TFIE STORM SEVER AT TFE LOCATIO�S, SIZES AND TYPES AS
C �-- - ; ADHER
O ��"' �.a. r B. PERFORIIANCE OF 7ME WORK SIWN ON TIE PLANS. ST�tM SEVERS SW1LL BE LAID IN TRUE ALIGNMENT IH � � �
U ----•*' A DRY PIPE TRENCH 'BEDDED' TO TFiE DETAIL AS SF�VN DI THE PLANS. PIPE
O �. 7EIAPORARY AMU PERMANEMT FROSION CON7ROL MEASURES SHALL BE USED AS N�DED. LAYING SNALL HEGIN AT TFIE LOV POINT OF TFiE SYSTEM AND PROCEED � �
�
� i �-- N DE
7ME CON7RAC70R SHALL ADHERE 70 d7Y OF 71GAR0�AS NE�ARY FOR EROSION UPGRADE VITH SPIGOT ENDS POINTING UPGRADE.
0 , 0• CON7ROL YEASURES. � � N
t .,�� 10. POLYVINYL CFILORIDE CP.V.CJ PIPE AND FtTTINGS SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM �
-"'�'°'" '�` ' 10.7ME CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINNlG ALL RpApWAYS KEEPNC 7HEM CLEAN D3034 SDR 35, THE .AINTS SHALL HE FLEXIBLE VITH ELEASTUERIC SEALS
O � 1 I ,' AN�FREE OF CONS7RUC110N MA10dAL5 AND DEBRtS, AND PRONdNG NEC�SSARY WST COMF�tMING TO ASTM D-3212 AND ASTM F477. CQITRACTOIt SFIALL PROVIDE �
� i St � �• 10. ���E���. STORM PIPING ����a�� ��ATIBLE VITH !EV AND EXISTING
> `��� ..�..._._. 11. BEFORE BApCFlLLMIG ANY�ADE UTNJ7Y NAPROVDAENTS CONIRACTOR TO Sl1RVE1'AND
y �, �. �
_., ...
a°, �, t- ,- _ ». r�cam�arrs oF oc�cr�oc�na��wo o�n�. �
I� ' 11. IPLETS SFIOULD BE CONSTRUCTED IN TFE LDCATIWS, ELEVATId�S AND
� •��1 ( # 12 ALL PQtMTS AND LICQISES NECESSARY FOR iHE D�ql710N AND COMPLE710N OF WORK DINENSIONS AS SF�VN DI TFE PLANS. INLETS SFIALL 8E SET PLUMH TO LIIE
-p ;, '�_ ! ��T ` _ 12 SHALL BE SECURED BY TFIE CON7RAC70R PRIOR TO CqAl101CMIG CONSIRUC71p1. AND GRADE AND S►UILL REST al A CAREFULLY GRADED, 11JIFORM HEARING BASE.
_--� i
O i , _.v. _.__z _�� ` i 13.BFFORE COMMENCING CONSiRUC110N. THE CON7RACTOR SHALL N071FY ALL PER7INQIT SP�EC10F EARAIE AND COVERS SHM.L BE CAST-IRDI CWSTRUCTIdI AS
� `' � ` CqIPAlHES OR AOENqES NATH UNDERGROUND UTIU7IES IH 1HE PRQIECT AREA 50 THAT
,D � ;+r� �� '° �,_, � 13. SAID UTIUTIES MAY BE ACCURAIELY LOCAIED. 12, TRENCH FOIJNDATIOK SHALL BE E%CAVATED TO SUITABLE SUBGRADE AND
INSPECTED HY GEOTECFRlICAL ENGINEER, IF CONDITIONS REOUIRE ADDITIONAL
C � ( -�' 14.THE LOCA710N OF OOSTNG UNDERGROUND UTNJTI6 SHOWN ON 7HE PLANS IS FOR SUBGRADE PREPARATION MAY 8E REOUIRED UNDER GEOTECFiNICAL ENGINEER.
L �,:� � _ . ... N/FORMATON ONLY AND IS NOT GUARANTEID TO BE ACCl/RA7E. PO7HOLE ALL CROSSINCS
� ( 14. AS NECESSARY BEFORE CONSTRUC71pN TO PREVENT CRADE M1�ALIGINAOJT CONFLICTS
O � '�
�
> �, � � -'- l J 15. '� COMNFIIqNC W1711 CONSiRUCiIONAAND SMALL BRING��DISCREPUnANpES TO 1HE AT7EN110N
Q r �� '•_� . Of fL01NNC SOI.UTONS
� , �f i'� j ���r 16. 18. AD.UST ALL INqDO�1TAL STRUC7URE� YANHOIF UDS. VALVE BOl�S. ETC. TO GRADE. �
�, �.�.,�„_:� __�._.._. ..�.�'�r° r
L '�K,i� - �Ei�p��� 17.CONCRETE 9iALL BE READY-IMX TYPE CONFORYING 70 7ME A57M CDI. 7HE CON/RAC70R a
� €� k:l SHALL ASSUTAE THE RESPON9BNJ7Y FOR MIIt DESN71 AND PRODl1CT PE3tFR0YANCE. 7lIE
t _ �},-. `� � ,r' . _ IMNIMUY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH FOR 7NENTY-OCHT 26)DAYS SHALL BE 3.000 POUNOS
__� rY PER S�UARE INd/. CONCRETE SHN.L BE PLACm IN c�uawwce w�n� Pa�cncES a+o
c � € i 'r C-:: .'-i "" 17. RECOM4ENDATONS OF iHE AMEAICAN CONCRETE INSIITUTE.
r ,
C7 , >
� 1&PRIOR TO PUCEMOJT OF D(TRUOED CURB. TFIE EfOS11NC SURFACE SHALL BE(X.EANm. 7HE
v� EPDXY RESIN BONDING ACE?IT SHALL BE APPIJm TO?HE FULL WIOiH OF 7FiE CONTACT
''' 1& SURFACE IN 57RICT CONFORNANCE M17H 7ME NANUFACTURER'S INSIRUCTIONS
U VICINITY MAP
'�' tY.SAWCUT S7RAICMT MATCHUNES TO CREAIE A BUTT JqNT BETMEEW 1HE EICSTING PAVEl1ENT
� 1B. AND 1}1E NEW PAVE]AENT.
�
a
� 20.n�corint�ctoa �s�sPa+s�Fat oo�ouno►� oF ewsrn+c�.a. ax�es. sa�w�wcs.
j �wo on�a s�a�o+is w�n�n�e rrto.�cr�. �
� �
/ r �Y� zC:'��Cr% -- ��-L��'�c g
o�
�
� ..
� N� (p
o �' — , _, �--
--_____
_
o �
a m ,� � � � �
e—o-��-- sa�,'-a�' W c� �
� �
� �m �
� zW z
W °� �
� � w
z �
SW CASCADE AVENUE ADJACENT \ � �� o
A LOT N�T IN � �� �
N WORK AREA tn m� � �
.
�
tJ
�
, �^��e
�§��&
�
���
EXISTING ����
BUILDING - �
APPR❑X 30,OOOSF zZ` �
>, .._. _._
__. x . S01�17'15' 292.79' .
�^ � , � _
. . . , __ ,
. _ . ,
n rn _ _ � . . �.
. - .
v
_ A�
EXISTING A/C �rn ��
NO CHANGES ,4
PROP�SED � !
�,
AREA=45,ODOS�
�
�
Q ��- a � ��._
< c�
� � Z � ,
� � c�i
�
�
C
O � �
U
O
� � � �
o ,� ` � � � s
o CULVERT �i .D X '°
; REPLACEMENT " � �, �
� ARE � �z =
� W c�
� N�,
6 � '
U
/
O
�
° WORK AREA SUBJECT T❑ �
r
�
° SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW ,,:,� rn
� IMPACT AREA=2500 °'�`°' �8 �� �
�
� ` Zz �
� � � , o—a—�
� �o
L
a CONSTRUCTI❑ —_____._ o �
USTAGING AREA � �� N❑TI SHOWN, NCIEW�RKAS
� AC❑RDING T❑ = z
APPR�VED ER�SI�N � � PR�P�SED�
N � �� ,� --- ___�____. L�T T❑ EAST= 89,700SF
�- CONTR�L P�AN �-� - - � --�--, _ _ � �� ��- :� - - EXISTING BUILDING= 17,735SF �
/ - _ � _.._�3.04� .._.—_,_, � �. _
� f7� 10p._...__ --___.________.___.__ _
_ k
'F n � s s�osa • 1 _.
_���-- ',
a� (�%j " �
, '
, �� � � M � �
; �
, , _
� EXISTING BUILDIN � � �
�� � � �
l � �
�� i ,�1 i o m �
'yCri.� xima i z�? z
i 'i Q �� C�7
`t
�
i XISTING SCALE VAULT 4 � �N o
--� XISTING �UTFALLTO W o
I� CULVERTS N:4723.0�90 N PR❑PERTY � Q� Q
� �
� :1000 PK180 z io�.s xloe.s � °�° �= N
� � xiaa ^
� � �{�
i/~
� 97.3 � U x102A X302.3 7iC101b a
w � X101.8 F'
+ PROTECT P❑LE v '°'� A/C o ;� ����
��w��
97 � (� C��
�07.7. ' ;��L2.�_��__.�.__--.._._
::^-5.9 X97ai ' � ----._ __. _
F`
, $
-"-,______,_ ,,,-""'-",� � —_.�,� V
_, " --�-�»�_.__ �yJ ��g' 0
� X96.B�, vo '' �� 2R���
�� � j
—�_.�__..__.__-�
R �t043_.__.___.._�.__.___._._
_.___ _ _ _ 1Q9 �
' � _.__.__._.._ , _: -
x9e.1
`, � �- - �� -------_
-Xau__.._..._..�__
� __ �
, . �
, . ;� _ ._..__._ , -----__,_— Xs9 x — _._ �
�
`� �` ,"` _._------,
' � , ___ _— .__.... b
__`�f��--
_ � r . __`"„"--`r—_��.. x� _ _ _-�(1 .9
-
---------�_�--- __
-
-
___..,._.__..�
, _______ �, 100..
-=_..---_-,..-.._. X1t).���� X� ... i{ww �.
,� ' --� .." ... �= � �
. _.""-_---'-.__---_,=C___..._
_.._....� --',-:..._.._. -. �
EXISTING DITC HAIN- NK �rv� ' ��
0 20 4 ��
# SENSITIVE LAND REVIEW AREA PLAN VIEW TREE
� CWORK LIMIT LINE) Scale.• 1" = 20'
�
�
Q
�
U
�
�
+�
N
C
O �
U
o � � �
�
L � y N
�
a�
° CrossSection-1 CrossSection-2 �
�
0 120,0 120,0 120,0 120,0 �
�
.�
i
�
a 110.0 1 5� 110,0 110,0 110.0
� 1 4'
a
� 1���� 1��,� 1���� 1��,0
0
; `� H W o �
�
� 90.0 N 90,0 90.0 N H W 90.0 �
�
L
Q1
L
p 50�� 5��� 50�� 8���
/
N
�
V
N
� SECTION 1 SECTION 2 �
� �
�
�
�
�
� ;�,� BOX CULVERT END, PR❑VIDE GRAT �
��: I IE=+/-97,5 �.�, � � � �
,��., C❑NTRACT❑R x� � _
TO FIELD VERIFY � �
� AFTER EXCAVATION DITCH INLET � �
� SEE SHEET Q� �
; SAW CUT A/C N:4723.0�90 N IE-+/- 99,5 ' � ZZ �
F BDTH SIDES :.t000�.aiso , - ;� w o� �
� ' �OINT: PK � lms xtao X�oz.s � � �c� �w
. 97� °'� � �`E CONNECT SC LE DRAIN x,�,, x,�, � � �� o
•. � REM❑VE EXISTING '� NEW CU V�ERT Z 1� � p� Q� � �
DUCTILE CULVERTS ; ;� a m� � �
: N 290 LF 3X6 BOX CULVERT ° x,�,, j ° _
° `���,-- ;�__------,_--__� S=0,0069 APPROX. �'W
.'� _____
� � �
____ _
� ____ � �
___
_x�.� _�,�, __�_ �
---- . . , ___ ..
__ ,� , . � __._. . _____-___— � �
� -- - -- -
__,��„
> _ . ___ �
___ ,
____�c�.___ � ,
r � �, �___ -
_ _._.
___.fl
, � � ; ; ___ - _______ _� -___ _____.__ ' ���
� , � _._-- ___�. _�` _._ ___�Ewu. __ � �s
, __ ..____
. ��, __:----____ �
DEFLECT B❑X
, x �
REMOVE � �
-,� - --��__._ �
, ---_—�,:—___ oo;, _ __
CULVERT BUSH/TREE �=��- - ,.r -- ���g
ACCESS MANHOLES � '
AS REQUIRED C❑NCRETE FIELD 100LF SEPARATI❑N s "'m
RIP-RAP ❑UTFALL INLET, C❑NNECT
CLASS 2 �D❑T WITH 4" 3034 PIPE REMOVE TREES 0 20 40 60
3 TYPICAL ��
REM❑VE/REL�CATE Scale: 1" = 20' • �
EXISTING FENCE �
°� PLAN VIEW
;
�
�
0
�
�
0
U
7
L
�
C � �
O
U
� � � �
s � � �
�
° CrossSection-2 �
aCrossSection-1
�, 120,0 120,0 c
� 120,0 120,0
�
i A -GR VEL iio,o AC GRA EL 1io,o
� 110,0 110,0 1 4'
0 1 .5'
L
� O 1��.� 1����
� 1��.� 1���� o I
� N �
HW N
v 90,o N 90,0 90,o P ❑PO ED 90,0
�
a P OP❑ ED C LV RT
o C LV RT so.o so.o
� so.o so,o
..
�
�
� SECTION 1 SECTION 2 �
a
� �
�
�
�
�
�
. � _ � � �
' Y GRAVEL "
i
3 ^ ___. ---------._ __ _=.' , DETECTABLE WARNING TAPE Z
�;- _ -- — — EXIST. A.C. 6' �,
l' , � � � '_f( � �
( ; � : �
J
I t3 ; t
INLET FRAME � ; 3 � �+� � r
.. � � � .�a; �... a ro .� o . u
� q2AT1NG 3 I s 3 � '� .a � �r. g..�.°,'�±:>'... ° �
3� E � ; ' BOX BACKFlLL ' d, EXIST. A.C. �� �°
m
, �
' Z
�� � � , 3 , � :d< 3 ft x B ft C O N C R E T E B O X C U L V E R T p� O
� _._ �.z�..3 i BEDDING ., _� �ry
: ,
6" MIN �' �_
m._... .. .._ .. .`... � W
.... _ - - �_..__....���
CRUSHED ROCK t> D ar J Z �
R�� � 300p p� 3 3"-MINUS �3 �
ADJACENT A/C CONCRETE o ^� FWNDATION Q ��
FlNISH � EMBANKMENT R� � � �
SURFACE AS REQUIRED 6' 6 PTM P ¢� �
�, . , x...r _ �:� ,_ _., z , BY GEOTECH� � DGEOiECHR � �
� W W
� ,, � h � ` .. 1A3N. t��N. ; FlELD � m� � N
j . . . .. .,: .. ♦' : :.r � � ' , - INSPECTION �
� i �!` ' /: �+ •.J,�. � �5��. ,►.'i` r'•,;•. ' �ES� W
� t2' .• � , �' r:. t:.;.'�i'�j,.. :i'.�„�•, ' •'t� • ...�.. '- �
j ��N• s '` � �� 4� 1. 1Y PAVEMENT SECTION - 4' AC OVER 8� COMPACTED GRAVEL �
' .',, ;y: , � . �
�•'::R." ,� ..:.'; �., ...' '':i.,
�....• � j] , ; ; .'' � QtQtjj
W '.� • �.) P� �� � � � � � ! � E��' �G�Nw
> IE PER � �. PIPE SIZE `: I ' ; i ' � G���
P,�,, , _ _ � � �:� ' � ; � ` .�.; � BOX BEDDING 8c BACKFIL� � �-�
�; �___ �,_ � � � � 5 N.T.S. R�f�
, �
/� `' f �, ( � � ' ,
� � � � �
_�_��`": ,T..__.�,.....r.,_ .,..__.. __.__. ; .
��� z'. r . ,::�..�^j', : ���� ='.y'"``��,-�..:,;�.°%,;'� `•_`'.s_ '`;..�
, �i �.
�
. . , s ,_ � .,
„c,'„� '.
� ,`'' ...., � t.
a' . . . �..' .°. , �. � v'.' ..• _ ♦'' �.`' '• •�
w �_ � � .� ._ A�
�. _ ._ fiM- g• � Bft I 6" '��
4 FOUNDATION B6 7Y [g ��
FlLL
Q, NOTES:
3 1. CONTRACTOR TO WIDEN EXCAVATION AS REQl11RED TO OBTAIN COLIPACTION
� NATH CONTRACTORS COMPACTION EQUIPAIENT.
c0 ■❑■
� 2 DITCN INLET ���Hanson
� 5 N.T. . Ilan�on Plp��Produab
�
� n �9sssTM o'rt�o°TNOw t�o�ts
N �sos�sas-sees
C FAX(S03)M2-3173 � �
O
� � � �
� 4' SPIGOT
L � � 5
c
° SHEET NOTES: 6' x 3' BOX CULVERT �
�
> A
� H�S L
� PIPE SHALL BE H-25 RATED BOX CULVERT BY HANSON PIPE roa v�Ew
�
� MANHOLE ACCESS TO BOX CULVERT SHALL BE PROVIDED EVERY 100 FT as•
° FOR ACCESS AND CLEANING. . � B'-0'
o TEMPORARY FIELD INLETS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR GRAVEL PARKING
^ � � I'2 r
� DRAINAGE.
> �o ,
a> . o q
� � � � �
� � i�
� 4.5' BELL .
d �
r
a
c
Q
= SIDE VIEW SECTION A
m r`
U
Q7
�� MANHOLE ACCESS POINTS NOT SHOWN
a
�
� 3 BOX CULVERT H-25 LOAD �
% 5 "
hi �
. . �
EROSION CONTROL P�AN NOTES
WATER BYPASS RECOMENDATIONS � � � �
ATTACH FlLTER =
FABRIC TO STAKES µ��SENT�TO E�N�,�NE�ERI�1��� A DITCH HYPASS STRATEGY J �
1. AppRpVILL pF 11115 Qtp9p►1/'SEp�ENTATION CUN7ROL(ESC)PLAN 006 NOT A ACCEPTABLE METHODS INCLUDE. EITHER PUIpING at GRAVITY F�OV �
CONS117U1E AN APPROVAL OF PERYANENT ROAD Olt DRAINAGE DESIGN(EG. SI�AND O � a
LOCATON OF ROADS. RESiRICTORS. CHANNFIS. RETENTION FACfLIIIES. U71UilE5.ETC.). YxY WOOD POST OR IETFIODS. TEMPOitATY BERMS/STRUCTURES MAY HE REGUIRED. � s
8. DY-PASS SFIALL BE SIZED Fdt TYPICAL SUINER FLOVS.
2 7FIE NIPLEMDJTA710N OF 1}iESE ESC P�ANS AND 7ME COlISTRUC710N,NAINIENANCE, FlL7ER FABRIC S� �� �T G IN TFE CASE � A LARfiE RAIN EVENT COiTRACT�t MAY BE REGUIRED � � v
REPLACEMENT. AND UPGRADWG OF TFiESE E9C fAql171E5 IS 1HE RESPOId9BR1TY OF TO PI�P VatIC AREA AFTER EVENT PASSES TO CQITIIAIE VatK.
7HE CONTRACTOR UNTL ALL CANS7RUC710N IS COMPIFIED AND APPROVED AND , ; � ._; /�REINfORqNC NETTING Q m o
BApCFlLL �i' y / �g �a��p 2. ADDITIdML Fd1MDATIDI ROdC TO STAB[LIZE FOUNDATIOi AREA IN TIE � � �
PERMANENT bEGETA710N�LANDSCAPING IS ESTABUSFIED. � w �
7�p.� Z � z � ti � ! CASE ff MIGH VATER IS THE RESPOlSIBILITY � TFE Cd1TRACTdt. Z Z Z
3. 7ME BOUNDARIES OF THE q.EARIHC UWTS SHOMN ON THIS PLAN SHALL BE CLEARIY g � v=r � O OW O
FuC.GED IN T►iE FlELO PRIOR To cON57ituCnaN. DuRr�G 7HE ooNSlRUClld1 PER�OO. r•� o � EIQST. GROUNO C.� _ �
No DISTi1RBAHCE BEYOND THE MGCED q.EARING U1MTS SMALL BE PERMITIEO. 1HE �n N x ; TO STAKES � W
f;+, .: + :
FUGqNC SHALL BE MNNTAINm BY THE CON7RACTOR FOR 7HE DURATION OF " W � ' z Z� �
cor�srnucnan. �° � �,�,�� O o 3 p
4. THE ESC FAqU71ES SHOMM ON 1FMS PLAN MUST BE CONSiRUCTED IN CONJUNCTION ? � ��
WITH ALL q.EARIN6 AND ORADMM AC7INTIES, AND IN SUCM A MANNER AS TO ENSURE ; � ��1 �� Q
7MAT SEDIMEMT AND SEDIMElIT LAODI WATER DO NOT EN1ER TIiE DRAIHAGE SYSTEM, V J
ROAOWAYS.OR NOLAIE APPIJCABLE WAIER STANUARDS. Eu � N , C� W� C.� �
S. THE ESC FAql111E5 910MM ON 7W5 PLAN ARE THE 1NNIAIUM REOUIRENENTS FOR € m� F- m
ANTIqPAiED SIIE CONDITIONS. DURMIG THE CONSIRUC110N PERIOD. 7HESE ESC 6" M1lN. �� ( 6' MAX. ; � N
FAdt111ES SHALL BE UPCRADED AS NEEDED FOR UNEXPEC7ED STORM EVEN15 AND TO � LLI r.
O15URE 1HAT SEDIMENT AND SEDMAENT LADEN WA1ER DO NOT LEAVE THE 97E. . . ......... , , . . . �
a
E. TFiE E9C FApU71E5 SHALL BE INSPECIED DAILY BY 1HE CONTRAC70R AND MAINTAINm P1
AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE THEIR CONTINUED FUNC1101NNG. NOTES:
7. iriE Esc fAaunES oN INACmE SI7ES SNALL 8E 1NSPEC7ED AND YAINTIYNED A 1. INSTALLAiION SHALL FOLLOW 7HE MANUFAC7URER5 ����
MMMUM OF ONCE A AIOW7H OR NATHIN 7HE 24 HWR5 Fq10NNG A STORY EYENT. w��
RECpAIAENDA710NS. fi��
6. AT NO 11NE SHALL YORE 7HAN ONE FOOT OF SEDNIENT BE ALLOM�ED 70 ACqIYULAIE s
MATMN A TRAPPED CATpi BASIN. ALL CATCH BASINS AND CONVEYANCE LINES SMALL 2 FlLTER FABRIC - USE AAINIMUM OF 36' NADE ROLLS.
BE CIEANED PRIOR TO PANNG. THE dEANING OPERATION SHALL NOT FLUSH SEDYENT , S E D I M E N T F E N C E ����
LADEN WAIER INTO THE DOWNSTREAN SYSTEN. �
O. STABNJZED COl1S7RUClION ENIRANCES S1iALL BE MISTALLED AT 1HE BEdNNMIG OF N.T.S.
CONSIRUC710N AN�NAINTAM�IED FOR 7HE DURATION OF 1HE PRQECT. ADDI110NAL 6
MEASURES MAY BE REOUNtED TO ENSURE 1HAT N1 PAYED AREAS ARE KEPT CLEAN
FOR 1HE DURA710N OF 7}iE PRO,ECT.
PLAN VIEW .�°`��
� � ��
gK�s�: : i ,o
i�9s.� Xioia
o, �'
1
a 1
�
° ;� BYPASS
�
° CHECK STRUCTU��23.0�90
� :10007.4180
� � �
" : PK ioi.s
� Xloza Xioz.s �
� � � �
�° �4�i� ' � .z. Xioza xio2a � � �
� Xuis ; �
r 1� WATER BYPASS � � � C
�
o ,a 97 (B � YPAS
` �>�q .�
� �a7.7_. . . � 5 �
> �9 X9;A , , �_____ _ C K S T R T E
o ________._ ,�_-�� �;i DESIGN
_.._
__.__. ,�,�,� _______�
p� ! x,� va�.9 .. � :
----�_._,_.,_ .__.._
j _ _ _ ��� ------__- ____..
_.__��
, � _ _ ,
__ __
�._..
, , ,..
'"---w-^"_^^.,..y X9e.t __�-___--�- ___ . ___.
U - __
- _,�, � X'fOL6.---_._.�
____
, � �'----___— -u__.___
�, ,� � r, > _ x99.6 X98.3 �, --_____.
_
�_ ___ �
, _ .�___ --�__.._.._ . x� _ _._
193A
�p ... .... ,. _... �'�."-_--�r_�_--:r_..__._,.�---_.--� ,.. ---�-t., ._ ._._,
� -`--___ �DO.___,__ �. x98.S '------_._.
� •.. ��-_._ �.::_.__. . _...,.v„� � X100.5 i x,�w.-
L � ��"'^'"'_.M=m�"------_.._.,. -.� ._._
C "-r-- ._.._..—�;,.._._�
� _:.� ,
�,. ___�::
�
�
N
>
� � 2� 4 �
/ �
� STAGING AREA
a PR❑TECTED BY Sca/e: 1" = 20'
% EROSION FENCE
�
U
N
O
�
d
N
N �
a�.
�
QI �