MLP2003-00011 .
� r
NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION
MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2003-00011 -� �
CITY OF TIGARD
PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION CommunityrUeveCopment
Shaping j��etter�'ommunity
120 DAYS = 12/3/2003
SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY
FILE NAME: PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION
CASE NO: Minor Land Partition (MLP) MLP2003-00011
PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of a two-lot partition on a parcel of land
containing approximately 17,860 square feet. This partition will create Parcel #1
with approximately 7,764 square feet, and Parcel #2 with approximately 8,222
square feet.
APPLICANT: Pacific Crest Partners, Inc. PROPERTY OWNER: Same
Attn: Dan Boyden
1430 Eastside Road
Hood River, OR 97031
ZONING
DESIGNATION: R-4.5 Low Density Residential. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to
accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential
units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-
family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also
permitted conditionally.
LOCATION: The subject property is located off of SW 90th Avenue, where 90�' Avenue
intersects with recently vacated SW Maple Street; WCTM 1 S135AA, Tax Lot 901.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters �8.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715,
18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
SECTION II. DECISION
Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has
APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the
decision is based are noted in Section V.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00011/PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION PAGE 1 OF 17
..
Y r
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT:
u mit to t e anning epartment at ew c ei egger, , ext. or review an
approval:
1. Submit a plan showing proper screening of the access drive from tax lot 906 according to Section
18.745.040 of the Tigard Development Code.
2. Record access and maintenance agreements for the proposed parcels and submit a signed copy
to the City.
3. Submit a plan showing the proposed access drive with street trees planted in accordance with
Section 18.745.040.C.
4. Provide a tree plan indicating the size, removal, mitigation and protection of all trees located on
the site.
Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and
approval:
5. Prior to commencing onsite improvements, a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required
for this project to cover the sewer tap and construction and any other work in the public right-of-
way. Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the
Engineenng Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the
Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public Facility
Improvement (PFI) permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design
Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ci.tigard.or.us).
6. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number
of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permittee", and who will
provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is
a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is
incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate
information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents.
7. Prior to final plat approval the applicant shall construct sidewalks along at least one side of the
private street.
8. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of $60.00.
(STAFF C�NTACT: Shirley Treat, Engineering).
9. The applicant shall execute a Restrictive Covenant whereby they a�ree to complete or participate
in the future improvements of SW 90th Avenue adjacent to the sub�ect property, when any of the
following events occur:
A. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for by the
formation of a Local Improvement District,
B. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for in whole or in
part by the City or other public agency,
C. when the improvements are par� of a larger project to be constructed by a third party and
involves the sharing of design and/or construction expenses by the third party owner(s) of
property in addition to the subject property, or
D. when construction of the improvements is deemed to be appropriate by the City Engineer
in conjunction with construction of improvements by others adjacent to the subject site.
10. The final plat shall show the dedication of ROW on 90th Avenue to provide 27 feet from
centerline.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00011/PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTfTION PAGE 2 OF 17
� T
11. The applicant shall cause a statement to be placed on the final plat to indicate that the proposed
private street(s)will be jointly owned and maintained by the private property owners who abut and
take access from it (them).
12. The applicant's plan shall show a public sewer extension from SW 90th Avenue to the proposed
development.
13. The applicant shall obtain approval from the Tualatin Valley Water District for the proposed water
connection prior to issuance of the City's Public Facility Improvement permit.
14. The applicanYs final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to
the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network (GC 22). These monuments
shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat
boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground
measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates
can be established by:
. GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey.
. By random traverse using conventional surveying methods.
15. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements:
A. Submit for City review four (4) paper copies of the final plat prepared by a land surveyor
licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative.
B. Attach a check in the amount of the current final plat review fee (Contact
Plannin�/Engineering Permit Technicians, at (503) 639-4171, ext. 2421).
C. The fina plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by
the Oregon Revised Statutes (Of�S 92.05), Washington County, and by the City of Tigard.
D. The ri ht-of-way dedication for 90 Avenue shall be made on the final plat.
E. NOT� Washington County will not begin their review of the final plat until they receive
notice from the Engineering Department indicating that the City has reviewed the final plat
and submitted comments to the applicant's surveyor.
F. After the City and County have reviewed the final plat, submit two mylar copies of the final
plat for City Engineer signature (for partitions), or City Engineer and Community
Development Director signatures (for subdivisions).
16. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant's professional engineer shall provide a sight distance
certification for the proposed access onto SW 90th Avenue.
17. The applicant's construction drawings shall show that the pavement and rock section for the
proposed private street(s) shall meet the City's public street standard for a local residential street.
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS:
u mit to t e ngineering epartment �m c i an, , ext. or review an
approval:
18. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with
a "photomylar" copy of the recorded final plat.
19. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of
the public improvements as follows: 1) 3 mil mylar, 2) a diskette of the as-builts in "DWG" format,
if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable, and 3) the as-built drawings shall be tied to the
City's GPS network. The applicanYs engineer shall provide the City with an electronic file with
points for each structure (manholes, catch basins, water valves, hydrants and other water system
features) in the development, and their respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates, referenced
to NAD $3 (91).
20. Any necessary off-site utility easements shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain and
shall be submitted to and accepted by the City prior to issuance of a building permit.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00011/PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION PAGE 3 OF 17
21. The applicant shall provide signage at the entrance of each shared flag lot driveway or private
street that lists the addresses that are served by the given driveway or street.
22. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW 90th Avenue
underground as a part of this project, or the shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding The fee
shall be calculated by the frontage of the si�e that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $27.50
per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $412.50 and it shall be paid prior to
issuance of building permits.
23. Prior to issuance of the building permit for Parcels 1 & 2, the applicant shall pay the standard
water quality and water quantity fees per lot (fee amounts will be the latest approved by Clean
Water Services (CWS).
24. The 25-foot undisturbed buffer shall be shown on the construction plans. The sensitive area
boundary and/or buffer shall be staked in the field throughout the construction process in order to
protect the sensitive area.
THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN (18)
MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION NOTED UNDER
THE PROCESS AND APPEAL SECTION OF THIS DECISION.
SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Pro ert Histo :
e su �ect parcel is located within the City of Tigard. The property is designated Low-Density
Residential on the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map. A land-use application adJusting lot lines to
decrease tax lot 901 from 52,757 square feet to 17,859 square feet was approved in December of 1999.
A minor land partition application was also applied for and approved in 1999. However, the approvals
expired. No other land use applications were found to be on file in the City's records.
Site Information and Pro osal Descri tions
e su �ect propert� is approximate y ,986 square feet. The site has approximately 15 feet of
frontage on SW 90 Avenue. The owner is pro osing a two-parcel partition as indicated on the
proposed partition plat. Parcel #1 (7,764 square feet�and Parcel #2 (8,222 square feet).
SECTION IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments were received.
SECTION V. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Land Partitions (18.420):
The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations;
The proposed partition will comply with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations at the
time of proposed development as demonstrated both by the analysis presented within this administrative
decision and by this application and review process through compliance with the conditions of approval.
Therefore, this criterion is met.
There are adequate public facilities available to serve the proposal;
Public facilities are discussed in detail later in this decision under Chapter 18.810 (Street & Utility
Improvement Standards). Based on the analysis provided herein, Staff finds that adequate public
facilities are available to serve the proposal. Therefore, this criterion is met.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2Q03-00011/PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION PAGE 4 OF 17
. t
All proposed improvements meet City and applicable agency standards;
The public facilities and proposed improvements are discussed and conditioned later in this decision
under Chapter 18.810 (Street & Utility Improvement Standards). Improvements will be reviewed as part
of the permit process and during construction, at which time the appropriate review authority will ensure
that City and applicable agency standards are met. Based on the analysis in this decision, Staff fmds
that this criterion is met.
All proposed lots conform to the specific requirements below:
The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable
zoning district.
The minimum lot width requirement in the R-4.5 zoning district,is 50 feet. The proposed partition creates
two lots that are an average of 80 feet wide. Therefore, this criterion is satisfied.
The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot, the
accessway may not be included in the lot area.
The minimum lot area requirement in the R-4.5 zoning district is 7,500 square feet. The proposed lots
are 7,764 and 8,222 square feet. The lots are flag lots and do not include the accessway as part of the
total square footage. Therefore, this criterion has 6een satisfied.
Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet
or have a legally recorded minimum 15 foot wide access easement.
The proposed partition shows both lots havin 15 feet of access onto SW 90th Avenue throuqh a private
drive. However, the applicant has indicated�hat the parcels will share an additional 15-foo�t access to
the south through cross-over easements. Therefore, fhe proposed parcels will have 30 feet of frontage
onto SW 90th Avenue. This standard has been met.
Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district.
No development is proposed in conjunction with this application. Setback requirements will be applied at
time of development. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied.
When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard,
provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to
maximize separation from existing structures.
No development is associated with this application. Therefore, this standard can be deferred until the
time of development.
A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an
accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.745.040.
Screening may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable
outdoor recreat�on areas for proposed development.
The proposed access drive is within ten (10) feet of the adjoining property to the north (tax lot 906).
Therefore, the applicant is required to screen the proposed access drive from the adjoining property to
the north (tax lot 906).
The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway
would have a detrimental effect on fire-fighting capabilities.
The Fire District has no conflicts with the partition as proposed. This criterion will apply only when
structures are developed on the vacant parcels.
Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one lot, a reciprocal easement
which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition
map.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00011/PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION PAGE 5 OF 17
The access drive associated with this application serves both of the proposed lots. Therefore, the
applicant is required to record access and maintenance agreements for the proposed parcels and
submit a signed copy to the City.
Any access way shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.705, Access, Egress and
Circulation.
This standard is addressed in greater detail under Chapter 18.705(Access Egress and Circulation)
below.
Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the one-hundred year
floodplain, the city shall reguire consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for
greenway ad oining and within the floodplain.. This area shall include portions at a suitable
elevation for�he construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance
with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan.
The subJ'ect site is not located within or adjacent to the 100-year floodplain. Therefore, this standard
does nof apply.
An application for a variance to the standards prescribed in this chapter shall be made in
accordance with Cha ter 18.370 Variances and Adjustments. The applications for the partition
and variance(s)/adjus�ment(s) wi�l be processed concurrently.
No variances or adjustments are associated with this application.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff can not confirm that the Land Partition standards have
been satisfied, however, if the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the
standards will be met:
CONDITIONS:
. Submit a plan showing proper screening of the access drive from tax lot 906
according to Section 1$.745.040 of the Tigard Development Code.
. Record access and maintenance agreements for the proposed parcels and submit a
signed copy to the City.
Residential Zonin Districts 18.510:
eve opment stan ar s in resi ential zoning districts are contained in Table 18.510.2 below:
TABLE 18.510.2
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES
STANDARD R-�.5
Minimum Lot Size
-Detached unit 7,500 sq.ft.
-Duplexes 10,000 sq.ft.
-Attached unit 1
Average Minimum Lot Width
-Detached unit lots 50 ft.
-Duplex lots 90 ft.
-Attached unit lots
Maximum Lot Covera e -
Minimum Setbadcs
-Front yard 20 ft.
-Side facing street on
corner&through lots 15 ft.
-Side yard 5 ft.
-Rear yard 15 ft.
-Side or rear yard abutting more
restrictive zoning district
-Distance between property line
and front of ara e 20 ft.
Maximum Height 30 ft.
Minimum Landsca e Re uirement -
[1]Single-family attached residential units permitted at one dwelling per lot with no more that five attached units in one grouping.
[2�Lot coverage includes all buildings and impervious surfaces.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00011/PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION PAGE 6 OF 17
The above standards are deferred until time of development.
Access, Eqress and Circulation (18.705):
�ntinuing�o�Ti�ation o property owner. The provisions and maintenance of access and egress
stipulated in this title are continuing requirements or the use of any structure or parcel of real
property in the City.
Access Plan requirements. No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are
presented an approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and
circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director
shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement.
The applicant has indicated that access will be shared with the two newly created parcels of MLP2003-
00012 (Fineview Farm LLC Partition). Therefore, four parcels will be using the same access through
cross-over and access easements. The access is proposed to be 30 feef with 20 feet of pavement,
which connects to SW 90th Avenue. This standard has been satisfied.
Joint Access. Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize
jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses,
structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title,
provided: Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases
or contracts to establish the joint use; and copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts
are placed on permanent file with the City.
The pro osed parcels will share access. The applicant has been conditioned earlier under Chapter
18.420 �Land Partitions) to provide documentation that establishes access and maintenance rights for
the individual parcels. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied.
Public street access. All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and
18.705.0301 shall connect directly with a public or private street approve by the City for public
use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis.
The proposed parcels will have access onto SW 90th Avenue by means of a 30-foot access drive with
20 feet of pavement. The applicant has been conditioned under Chapter 18.420 (Land Partitions) to
show satisfactory evidence that each parcel has the legal right to use the existing access. Therefore,
this standard has been satisfied.
Inadequate or hazardous access. Applications for building permits shall be referred to the
Commission for review when, in the opinion of the Director, fhe access proposed: Would cause
or increase existing hazardous traffic conditions; or would provide inadequate access for
emergency vehicles; or would in any other way cause hazardous conditions to exist which
would constitute a clear and present danger to the public health, safety, and general welfare.
Direct individual access to arterial or collector streets from single-family dwellings and duplex
lots shall be discouraged. Direct access to major collector or arterial streets shall be considered
only if there is no practical alternative way to access the site. In no case shall the design of the
service drive or drives require or facilitate the backward movement or other maneuver�ng of a
vehicle within a street, other than an alley. Single-family and duplex dwellings are exempt from
this requirement.
The proposed lots will take access from a private drive that connects to SW 90th Avenue which is a local
street. Tualatm Valley Fire and Rescue did not indicate that the access to the site is in any way
hazardous or constitutes a clear and present danger. Therefore, this standard does not apply.
Access Manaqement (Section 18.705.030.H)
�ection .7�b�6�b.R. states t at an access report shall be submitted with all new development
proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking
needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City
and AASHTO.
The applicant has indicated in the narrative that vision clearance areas can be met and that sight
distance to the north is currently unobstructed. The applicant's engineer shall provide sight distance
certification for the proposed shared access prior to approval of the final plat.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00011/PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION PAGE 7 OF 17
Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence
area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where
queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway
setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be150 feet, measured from the right-
of-way line of the intersectin� street to the throat of the proposed drivewa�. The setback may be
�reater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic
impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less
than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the
adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far
from the intersection as possible.
Both Oak and Locust Streets are classified as collector streets. The proposed shared access onto gptn
Avenue is located approximately 310 feet from Locust Street and 450 feet from Oak Street, thereby
meeting this criterion.
Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a
collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall
be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet.
SW 90th Avenue is classified as a local street; therefore this standard does not apply to the proposed
d riveway.
Access drives in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the
turning around of fire apparatus by one of the following: a) A circular, paved surface having a
minimum turn radius measured from center point to outside edge of 35 feet; b) A hammerhead-
configured, paved surface with each leg of the hammerhead having a minimum depth of 40 feet
and a minimum width of 20 feet; c) The maximum cross slope of a required turnaround is 5%.
The access drive is approximately 135 feet in length. Therefore, no fire apparatus turn-around is
necessary.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds the Access, Egress and Circulation Standards
have been met.
Densitv Computations (18.715):
DeFnition of net develo ment area. Net development area, in acres, shall be determined by
su rac ing e o owing an area s) from the gross acres, which is all of the land included in
the legal description of the property to be developed:
1. All sensitive land areas:
a. Land within the 100-year floodplain;
b. Land or slopes exceeding 25%;
c. Drainage ways; and
d. Wetlands.
2. All land dedicated to the public for park purposes;
3. All land dedicated for public rights-of-way. When actual information is not available, the
followin� formulas may be used:
a. Single-family development: allocate 20% of gross acreage;
b. Multi-family development: allocate 15% of gross acreage.
4. All land proposed for private streets; and
5. A lot of at least the size required by the applicable base zoning district, if an existing
dwelling is to remain on the site.
Calculatin maximum number of residential units. To calculate the maximum number of
resi entia uni s per net acre, ivi e t e num er o square feet in the net acres by the minimum
number of square feet required for each lot in the applicable zoning district.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00011/PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION PAGE 8 OF 17
I
I
Calculatin minimum number of residential units. As required by Section 18.510.040, the
minimum num er o resi en ia uni s per ne acre shall be calculated by multiplying the
maximum number of units determined in Subsection B above by 80% (0.8).
The standards for density computation deal with the intensity of residential land uses, usually stated
as the number of housing units per acre. The total square footage of the subject property is 17,778
square feet. However, to determine the net developable area, the square footage of the accessway
1,792 square feet) is subtracted as it is excluded from the lot area per Tigard Development Code
TDC) Section 18.120.089(g). This results in a net developable area of 15,986 square feet. As the
minimum lot size for the R-4.5 zone is 7,500 square feet, the maximum number of residential units is
two (2). The minimum number of residential units is one (1). The applicant is proposing a two (2) lot
partition. Therefore, the density for the subject property has been met.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Density Computation Standards have been met.
Landscapinq and Screeninq (18.745):
Street trees: Section 18.745.040
ec ion . 45.040.A.: All development �rojects fronting on a public street, private street or a
private driveway more than 100 feet in length approved after the adoption of this title shall be
required to plant street trees in accordance with the standards in Section 18.745.040C.
The proposed access is approximately 105 feet in length; according to the standard, driveways in
excess of one hundred (100) feet in length are required to have street trees. Therefore, the applicant is
required to submit a plan showing the proposed access drive with street trees planted in accordance
with Section 18.745.040.C.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Landscaping and Screening Standards have not been
met.
CONDITION: Submit a plan showing the proposed access drive with street trees planted in accordance
with Section 18.745.040.C.
Tree Removal (18.790):
ree p an o�fie pTanting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall
be provided for any lot„ parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development
application for a subdivision, partition site development review, planned development or
conditional use is filed. Protection is pre�erred over removal wherever possible.
The applicant has not addressed tree removal. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide a tree
plan indicating the size, removal, mitigation and protection of all trees located on the site.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Landscaping and Screening Standards have not been
met.
CONDITION:Provide a tree plan indicating the size, removal, mitigation and protection of all trees
located on the site.
Visual Clearance Areas (18.795):
TFiis ap er requires tFia��ar vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property
adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private
driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or
temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that
obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight
8 feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight
8 feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a
-foot distance points with a straight line.
The applicanYs plans show no obstructions within the visual clearance triangles associated with the
partition.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00011/PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION PAGE 9 OF 17
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Staff finds that the Vision Clearance Standards have been
met.
IMPACT STUDY (18.390.0401:
F�equires t at t e app icant shall include an impact study. The study shall address, at a
minimum, the transportation system, including bikewaxs, the drainage system, the parks
system, the water system, the sewer system, and the noise impacts of the development. For
each public facility system and type of impact of the development on the public at large, public
facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community
Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either
specifically concur with the dedication of real property interest, or provide evidence which
supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly
proportional to the projected impacts of the development.
The applicant has submitted an Impact Study that addresses the following systems:
Trans ortation S stem:
ere are Just un er trips per day generated from a single-family detached home. There will be two
homes built on this property as a result of this partition, which will add almost 20 trips per day onto SW
90th Avenue, a local street and other streets such as SW Locust, a collector street. No new streets will
be created. This amount of traffic on the existing streets would not be considered significant, or degrade
the level of service on the street. There is nothing in the Transportation System Pan indicating a
capacity problem in this area. (The closest recommended improvements are improvements to the
intersection of SW Hall and SW Oak, widening of SW Hall to five lanes, and widening of SW Greenburg
north of SW Locust to five lands). No dedication of right-of-way is necessary, according to the City
Engineer.
Southwest Hall, which is only about 1,300 feet away from this development, is a transit route.
There are no bicycle lanes on SW 90th Avenue, or on any of the nearby streets. No bikeways are
identified on the pedestrian/bikeway plan through this property. The amount of bicycle traffic that will be
generated from the two new homes is not significant.
The new homes will contribute to the funds available for system-wide improvements through payment of
the Transportation Impact Fee (TIF).
Draina e S stem:
e property rains to the east and south, towards the wetland area. Drainage from the shared
driveway will be piped to the edge of the wetland through a 12-inch concrete pipe, and then released into
a riprap pad. The site plan will accommodate the upstream drainage adjacent to this development. The
partition will not significantly increase the amount of runoff into the public system. Clean Water Services
has already provided a service letter, accepting the proposed drainage system. The new homes will
contribute to the funds available for system-wide improvements through payment of the water quality fee
(in-lieu-o�.
Park S stem:
ere wi e some use of nearby parks, such as Metzger Park. Residents may also use the school
grounds during non-school hours. The new homes will contribute to the funds available for system-wide
park improvements through payment of the System Development Charge (SDC).
Water S stem:
e water system has the capacity to serve this development. There are two public water lines available
in SW 90th Avenue, a 16-inch line and a 6-inch line. There will be no significant impact to the water
system as a result of this two-lot development. The new homes will contribute to the funds available for
system-wide improvements through payment of the Sewer SDC.
Sewer S stem:
e sewer system has the capacity to serve this development. There is an existing sewer main in SW
90th Avenue. There will be no significant impact to the sewer system as a result of this two-lot
development. The new homes will contribute to the funds available for system-wide improvements
through payment of the Sewer SDC.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00011/PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION PAGE 10 OF 17
Noise Im acts:
ere wi e constn.�ction-related noise generated during construction of the driveway and utilities, and
then the homes. After construction, there will be no significant noise impact on the neighborhood.
Rough Proportionality:
Any required street improvements to certain collector or higher volume streets and the Washington
County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) are mitigation measures thaf are required at the time of development.
Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan
II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development
on the Collector and Arterial Street system. Presently, the TIF for each trip that is generated is $239.00.
The total TIF for a single-family dwelling is $2,390 per unit.
Upon completion of this development, the future builders of the residences will be required to pay TIF's
of approximately $4,780 ($2,390 x 2 single-family dwelling units. Based on the estimate that total TIF
fees cover 32 percent of the impact on ma�or street improvements cit ide, a fee that would cover 100
percent of this projects traffic impact is $14,937 ($4,780 divided by .32�The difference befinreen the TIF
paid and the full impact, is considered an unmitigated impact. Since the TIF paid is $4,780, the
unmitigated impact can be valued at $10,157. Given that the estimated cost of the dedication is $90.00
($3.00 x 30 square, feet), the requirement to make these improvements falls within the limits of
proportionality to the impact of the development.
PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS
Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810L
Z ap er . provi es cons ruc ion s an ar s or e implementation of public and private
facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are
addressed below:
Streets:
Improvements:
Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be
improved in accordance with the TDC standards.
Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion
of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC.
Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a local street to have a
54 ri�ht-of-way width and 32-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-
stree parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utifities, street IigF�ting, storm drainage,
and street trees.
This site lies adJ'acent to SW 90�h Avenue, which is classified as a local street on the City of Tigard
Transportation Plan Map At present, there is approximately 25 feet of right-of-way (ROW} from
centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate RbW to
provide 27 feet from centerline.
SW 90�' Avenue is currently paved, but not fully improved to City standards. In order to mitigate the
impact from this development, the applicant should sign a Restrictive Covenant for future street
improvements.
Future Street Plan and Extension of Streets: Section 18.810.030.F states that a future street plan
shall be filed which shows the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the
boundaries of the proposed land division. This section also states that where it is necessary to
give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to
the boundary lines of the tract to be developed and a barricade shall be constructed at the end of
the street. These street stubs to adjoining properties are not considered to be cul-de-sacs since
they are intended to continue as through streets at such time as the adjoining property is
developed. A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the property owners
which shall not be removed until authorized by the City Engineer, the cost of which shall be
included in the street construction cost. Temporary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de-
sac bulbs shall be constructed for stub streets �n excess of 150 feet in length.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00011/PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION PAGE 11 OF 17
The applicant has indicated that there is not an oppo�tunity for future street connections through this
development due to the wetlands area on the west side of this property. Staff concurs with this
assessment.
Private Streets: Section 18.810.030.T states that design standards for private streets shall be
established by the City Engineer. The City shall require legal assurances for the continued
maintenance of private streets, such as a recorded maintenance agreement. Private streets
serving more than six dwelling units are permitted only within planned developments, mobile
home parks, and multi-family residential developments.
The applicant has indicated that this partition will provide a 10-foot paved shared access within a 15-foot
easement. The applicant has also indicated that the adjacent partition will be providing the same section
on their property. The two combined will provide a 20-foot private street within a 30-foot access
easement be recorded such that all four properties created will have full use of the entire private street.
The applicant shall place a statement on the face of the final plat indicating the private street(s) will be
owned and mamtained by the properties that will be served by it/them. The City's public improvement
design standards require private streets to have a pavement section equal to a public local street. The
applicant will need to provide this type of pavement section.
Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be
desi�ned with due regard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated,
cons�deration of needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and
recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography.
Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall
not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of-way line except:
. Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of
water or, pre-existing development or;
. For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, major collectors or
railroads.
. For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access.
The location of the proposed access drive is precluded from extending to SW Maple Court to the east by
a wetland. Therefore this standard does not apply.
Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements
or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is not possible. Spacing between
connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or
topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards
in the code.
As mentioned above, connection of the proposed private street to SW Maple Court to the east is
precluded by an existing wetland. Therefore, this standard does not apply.
Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from beiny more than 2.5 times
the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the
applicable zoning district.
The average lot width for the proposed parcels is approximately 80 feet. Therefore, the depth of the
proposed lots cannot exceed 200 feet. The applicant's plans show the lots to be no more than 125 feet
deep at the furthest point from the front of the lots. This criterion has been satisfied.
Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public
or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies,
which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide
recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit,
the frontage shall be at least 15 feet.
The smallest of the proposed parcels has approximately 35 feet of frontage onto the proposed private
street, which connects to SW 90th Avenue. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00011/PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION PAGE 12 OF 17
Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design
standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private
streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side.
The applicant will be required to sign a Restrictive Covenant for future street improvements, which will
include the construction of sidewalks along the frontage of SW 90�'Avenue.
The private street that will serve the four lots (2 lots for this partition and 2 lots for the adjacent partition)
will be required to construct sidewalks on at least one side.
Sanitary Sewers:
Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each
new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the
provisions set forth in Design and Constructivn Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water
Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or
amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan.
Over-sizin�: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include
consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive
Plan.
The applicant's plan indicate that a new, 8-inch public sewer will be constructed from the sewer in 90�'
Avenue to the lots. A public easement will be required for a portion of the sewer line. The applicant will
be required to provide a copy of the recorded easement prior to construction.
Storm Drainage:
General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for
storm water and flood water runoff.
Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other
drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream
drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the
necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for
Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and
including any future revisions or amendments).
There is no significant upstream drainage way. Any upstream runoff entering the project access area
will be collected in the proposed catch basin.
Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the
City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing
draina�e facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the develo�ment until
provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have
been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the
Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by
Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments).
In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno
Creek Watershed Managemen� Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local
governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no
net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments
resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the
development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the
storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention.
Developments of this small size, especially residential land partitions, are not required to Provide on-site
detention. The applicant will be required to pay the water quantity SDC upon application for the building
permits.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00011lPACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION PAGE 13 OF 17
The applicant's plans indicate that runoff will be collected and discharged to the existing wetland to the
west. The plans provide for a rip-rap outfall for energy dissipation and erosion control.
Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways:
Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed
bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for
the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way.
SW 90th Avenue is not designated as a bicycle facility.
Utilities:
Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric,
communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed
underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and
meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during
construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and:
. The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide
the underground services;
. The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities;
. All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets
by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and
. Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street
improvements when service connections are made.
Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall
pay a fee in-lieu of under-�rounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a
street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the
approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the
utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The
determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such
situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the
placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An
applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which
are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of
under-grounding.
There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW 90�' Avenue. If the fee in-lieu is
proposed, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The
frontage along this site is 15 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $412.50.
ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT
Public Water S stem:
ua a in a ey ater District provides public water service in this area. The applicant will need to
contact TV Water District for a new water service upon construction of the new homes.
Storm Water Qualit :
e ity as agree to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM regulations established by
Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards �adopted by Resolution and
Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities
shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm
water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan
shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility
maintained through the year.
The CWS standards include a provision that would exclude small projects such as residential land
partitions. It would be impractical to require an on-site water quality facility to accommodate treatment of
the storm water from 2 parcels. Rather, the CWS standards provide that applicants should pay a fee
in-lieu of constructing a facility, if deemed appropriate. Staff recommends payment of the fee in-lieu on
this application.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00011/PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION PAGE 14 OF 17
Address Assi nments:
e i y o igar is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within
the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30.00 per address sha{I be
assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to final plat approval.
For this project, the addressing fee will be $60.00 (2 lots and/or tracts X $30/address = $60.00).
The developer will also be required to provide signage at the entrance of each shared flag lot driveway
or private street that lists the addresses that are served by the given driveway or street. This will assist
emergency services personnel to more easily find a particular home.
Surve Re uirements
e app ican s ina p at shall contain State Plane Coordinates [NAD 83 (91)] on two monuments with a
tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network (GC 22). These monuments
shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat
boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground
measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be
established by:
. GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey.
. By random traverse using conventional surveying methods.
In addition, the applicant's as-built drawings shall be tied to the GPS network. The applicanYs engineer
shall provide the City with an electronic file with points for each structure (manholes, catch basins, water
valves, hydrants and other water system features in the development, and their respective X and Y
State Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD 83 (91�.
SECTI4N VI. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS
City of Tigard Water Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it.
City of Tigard Long Range Planning Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to
it.
City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it.
City of Tigard Building Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it.
SECTION VII. AGENCY COMMENTS
Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments.
As per the applicants request, the conditions in this approval letter are based on both homes
being protected with automatic fire sprinklers installed in accordance with NFPA 13D.
�� FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD DISTANCE FROM BUILDING AND TURNAROUNDS: Access
roa s s a e wit in eet o a portions o t e exterior wa o t e irst story o t e uilding as
measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building. An approved turnaround is
required if the remaining distance to an approved intersecting roadway, as measured along the fire
apparatus access road, is greater than 150 feet. (UFC Sec. 902.2.1)
No turnaround will be required for fire apparatus.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00011/PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION PAGE 15 OF 17
2� FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD WIDTH AND VERTICAL CLEARANCE: Fire apparatus access
roa s s a ave an uno structe wi t o not ess t an eet eet or one or two dwelling
units and out buildings), and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches.
(UFC Sec. 902.2.2.1) Where fire apparatus roadways are less than 28 feet wide, "NO PARKING"
signs shall be installed on both sides of the roadway and in turnarounds as needed. Where fire
apparatus roadways are more than 28 feet wide but less than 32 feet wide, "NO PARKING" signs
shall be installed on one side of the roadway and in turnarounds as needed. Where fire apparatus
roadways are 32 feet wide or more, parking is not restricted. (UFC Sec. 902.2.4)
3� SURFACE AND LOAD CAPACITIES: Fire apparatus access roads shall be of an all-weather
su ace t at is easi y istinguis a e rom the surrounding area and is capable of supporting not less
than 12,500 pounds point load (wheel load) and 50,000 pounds live load (gross vehicle weight). You
may need to provide documentation from a registered engineer that the design will be capable of
supporting such loading. Documentation from a registered engineer that the finished construction is
in accordance with the approved plans or the requirements of the Fire Code may be requested.
(Design criteria on back) (UFC Sec. 902.2.2)
a� TURNING RADIUS: The inside turning radius and outside turning radius shall be not less than 25
eet an 4 eet respectively, measured from the same center point. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.3)
s� NO PARKING SIGNS: Where fire apparatus roadways are not of sufficient width to accommodate
par e ve ic es an 20 feet of unobstructed driving surface, "No Parking" signs shall be installed on
one or both sides of the roadway and in turnarounds as needed. (UFC Sec. 902.2.4) Signs shall
read "NO PARKING - FIRE LANE - TOW AWAY ZONE, ORS 98.810 - 98.812" and shall be installed
with a clear space above grade level of 7 feet. Signs shall be 12 inches wide by 18 inches high and
shall have black or red letters and border on a white background. (UFC Sec. 901.4.5.1) — (See
diagram on back)
s> GRADE: Private fire apparatus access roadway grades shall not exceed an average grade of 10
percent with a maximum grade of 15 percent for lengths of no more than 200 feet. Infersections and
turnarounds shall be level (maximum 5%� with the exception of crowning for water run-off. Public
streets shall have a maximum grade of 15/o. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.6)
�� SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES - FIRE HYDRANTS: Fire hXdrants for single family
we ings, up exes an su - ivisions, s a e p ace at eac intersection. Intermediate fire
hydranfs are required if any portion of a structure exceeds 500 feet from a hydrant at an intersection
as measured in an approved manner around the outside of the structure and along approved fire
apparatus access roadways. Placement of additional fire hydrants shall be as approved by the
Chief. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.2)
s� SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS - REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: The minimum available fire flow for
sing e ami y we ings an up exes s a e , ga ons per minute. If the structure(s) is(are)
3,600 square feet or larger, the required fire flow shall be determined according to UFC Appendix
Table A-III-A-1. (UFC Appendix III-A, Sec. 5)
s) ACCESS AND FIRE FIGHTING WATER SUPPLY DURING CONSTRUCTION: Approved fire
apparatus access roa ways an ire ig tm� water supp ies s a e insta e an operational prior to
any other construction on the site or subdivision. (UFC Sec. 8704)
SECTION VIII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION
Notice: Notice was mailed to:
X The applicant and owners
�— Owner of record within the required distance
� Affected government agencies
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00011/PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION PAGE 16 OF 17
Final Decision:
THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON SEPTEMBER 16, 2003 AND BECOMES
EFFECTIVE ON OCTOBER 1, 2003 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED.
_A��eal:
The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are
otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may
appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Communit� Development
Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director
within ten (10) business days of the date theTlotice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule
and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard,
Oregon 97223.
Unless the applicant,is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be
confined to the specif'ic issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the
comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may
be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, sub�ect to any additional rules of procedure that
may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body.
THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON SEPTEMBER 30, 2003.
Questions:
yoTf�ave any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW
Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171.
,
�� September 16, 2003
PREPA E athew eidegger DATE
Associate Planner
, September 16, 2003
APPROVED BY: Richard H. rsdorff DATE
Planning Manag
i/curpl Nmathew/ml p/mIp2003-00011.dec
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00011/PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION PAGE 17 OF 17
. � %
� /
/
--__ GEOGRA�NiC �NFORMATiON SvSTEN
%
YIQNITY MAP
CORAL ST
� MLP2003-00011
C
PACIFIC CREST
PARTNERS
sr PARTITION
�
�
0
�
0
`��V > � � ��
��;` � � '�;� � ��s�
, �—�
._
�;S{�� ,, °° � -� -:
MAPLELEAF ST � \ . > fY=.,� -- ..�-,;-�(
.
w Q �t�'/t '�� -,�}'� ,
� > � ��
MAPL �.... »rN' ��__ ._( r ,•�, "(
� Q , t�, �d. 1 �' ,
��rR� - - — --� ' ,_
� _ y
i--..... ♦._"��.�� O : �IL-3GNITF� 5�..
i..J �i
� ,,. � ��� ,
� �EF��;���..� L..._�._L .�
_...�-..�.... ,r:.,, . . ;
, �1
�.,..:: �
r
Tqard Area Map " � f
2
H •
� J N
�O = 0 100 200 300 Feet
1"=249 feet
ST
O
City of Tigard
Informatlon m thls map is for general locatim onty and
should be verifieO with Me Development Services�ivlsim.
13125 SW Hall BIvC
Tigard,OR 97223
(503)6330171
http:l/w.vw.ci.tigaM.a.us
Community Development Plot date:Aug 8,2003;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR
I o I I , � ---�
� �, � � � �-------- �
� � � � � � �
� � TL 806
-----
(/� I ——— I
TL 100 � I � TL 906 �ar � ----------i I
� � Porce! 1 /� T� 800 � �
��� N �,�sa sq.rr. �ti5, � i
� I - ' o �-----------y
I I � / � �
�
--------- J � I ��Parcel 2 � �
as_
1APLE STREET � Ne�: s,222 sq.�t, �
cn 88 �05• i� Gross: 10,014 sq./t.
U
_ �
. S,' ry0
--------- � � TL 1001 �� 6' /
I �
I � '�� .
� � � .
i 50 i
I � ��
TL 100 � I `,� '
i I �----------- i�/ �P-1
,
� � %
� F
� j TL 1002 � '��
I � �' \G�. /�___.
I � / � i �
� � G---------- — P�--�/ �
I � -�Lp ' � I
� i I
� � TL 1101 �P\� i� �
I
I j ���0 ��/ I
� � I �� � I
I � 0P'� i�/ I
i r----------r------------ �P �� i _
� j TL 1102 I TL 1100 � TL 401 �i I
I I � � /� /, �
� � � � � TL 1200 I
1 I � � �
� I I �
� I I i �� �
� �
� (ITY oF Ti�ARD T MLP2003-00011
CffY Oi TIOAfD
5� P�"'' N PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION
Ma is not to scale
NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION
_.,,, .
MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2003-00011
CITY OF TIGARD
PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION Community�eve�opment
S(zaping,7 BetterCornmunity
120 DAYS = 12/3/2003
SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY
FILE NAME: PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION
CASE NO: Minor Land Partition (MLP) MLP2003-00011
PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of a two-lot partition on a parcel of land
containing approximately 17,860 square feet. This partition will create Parcel #1
with approximately 7,764 square feet, and Parcel #2 with approximately 8,222
square feet.
APPLICANT: Pacific Crest Partners, Inc. PROPERTY OWNER: Same
Attn: Dan Boyden
1430 Eastside Road
Hood River, OR 97031
ZONING
DESIGNATION: R-4.5 Low Density Residential. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to
accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential
units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-
family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also
permitted conditionally.
LOCATION: The subject property is located off of SW 90th Avenue, where 90th Avenue
intersects with recently vacated SW Maple Street; WCTM 1 S135AA, Tax Lot 901.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715,
18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
SECTION II. DECISION
Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has
APPROVED the above request. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted
in the full decision, available at City Hall.
THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS
FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION.
All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or
copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25�) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the
time of the request.
SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION
Notice:
No�ice mailed to:
X The applicant and owners
—� Owner of record within the required distance
—� Affected government agencies
Final Decision:
THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON SEPTEMBER 16, 2003 AND BECOMES
EFFECTIVE ON OCTOBER 1, 2003 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED.
Appeal:
The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are
otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may
appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community
Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed
with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The
appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW
Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223.
Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be
confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the
comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may
be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that
may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body.
THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON SEPTEMBER 30, 2003.
Questions:
For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Mathew Scheidegger at
(503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223.
� ...........................
' naN�r ru�r
CORAL S
�I
� MLP2003-0001 f
________ ,
PACIfIC CREST
PARTNERS
sr PARTITION
,� ,�
� �
m
.. �S(E ''
LEAF T — � > — �
� >~ a �.
�.;„,.,?
\ ��l . `
v
Sy...
1� N
� J
� � �rr
ST �
Ciry of Tiyud
��ew�
�__ � / I _
F
I � I
i __________J
I I �
I p� �
; � I I I � iL 806 �
TL 100 � V:I �-_'______ fr '______—__, I
� I � TL 9D6 1 �
� Parcel � '�/ i
' z>s..q.r�. ,,, r�eoo , J
�'i � • ' L_______'_
I I � / 6 -�
r J � i . i
- - I ' Poftel 2 �
fAPIE STREET -'-�"•:e.uol�a.a�. i
___Y. ue., . .
nti
+r
'_____'_' � I TL 1001 �� �� /
I �
I �
I � � •
I �
�\
Tl 100 � I ,
� f'_'___'_-_ �� {
i i � � y1P
� � 0``
� � 7�tao2 /� 1
� I i / 2-��'� / �---
i
� i �'--------- O i i
i i , -'OP'--� i
i ���' / i
i I � ri t t ot Q.P �
i � p �
i i �. �'� i
i � � i
i I i 0��0 ��, i
I ---- -----
i r------ r------- ,yP / i
� i n uoz i T�i�oo n�m i� i
i
i � i i i
i i i n iaoo i
i I i i i
i i i , i
� CITY oF T�GARD I MLP2003•00011
��°LA''' N PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION
M� ItnMtofule
NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER:
THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER.
NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION CITYOFTIGARD
MINOR LAND PARTITION Community�De•�.e�p„��nt
Skaping,a BetterCommunity
DATE OF NOTICE: August 11, 2003
Fi�E NunnBER: MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2003-0001 I
FILE NAME: PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION
PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval to perform a two-lot partition on a parcel of land
containing approximately 17,860 square feet. This partition will create Parcel #1 with
approximately 7,764 square feet, and Parcel#2 with approximately 8,222 square feet.
ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to
accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at
a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are
permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally.
APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390,
18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
LOCATION: 10230 SW 90"'Avenue; WCTM 1 S135AA, Tax Lot 901.
YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS:
Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to
submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT
5:00 PM ON AUGUST 25, 2003. All comments should be directed to Mathew Scheideq,qer, Associate Planner in
the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the
City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171 or by e-mail to matts(a�ci.tiqard.or.us.
ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIfIED
ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS.
THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS
WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A OECISION ON THIS ISSUE
IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR SEPTEMBER 9, 2003. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE
SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED.
WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL
CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
. Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria
believed to be applicable to this proposal;
. Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to
provide a response;
. Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant
approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue.
Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude
subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings
directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence.
AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE
DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERIY LOCATED WITHIN
500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE
ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED
UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH
CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION.
SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS:
. The application is accepted by the City
. Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a
14-day written comment period.
. The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies.
. City Staff issues a written decision.
. Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all
owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax
assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any
governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the
City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice.
INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW:
The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are
contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development
Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the cu�rent rate charged for this
service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of
this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments."
II .�,a.....�..o.....o.,..,.. �
�
� YIQNITY MAP
CORAL gT
MLP2003-0001 I
PACIFIC CREST
PARTNERS
sr PARTITION
�
°> ,
J
m
U.I
� MAPLELEAF ST j Q �
J"
,.�H.r� ... :
� � '`�
S
� N
aD J
� _ � r
ST �
Ciry of Tyvd
rn++�a+..e
��q.a.�on�rrrMi
rnna.n�
_ «ern.�aqwer
� .� �T .
, TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCU� SOUTH DIVISION
� COMMUNITY SERVICES • OPERATIONS • FIRE PREVENTION
Tualatin Valley
Fire & Rescue
September 2, 2003
Mathew Scheidegger, Associate Planner
City of Tigard
13125 SW Hall Blvd
Tigard, OR 97223
Re: Pacific Crest Partners Partition
Dear Mathew,
I have reviewed the submittal for the above named project and have the following comments:
1) FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD DISTANCE FROM BUILDING AND TURNAROUNDS: Access roads
shall be within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior wall of the first story of the building as measured by an
approved route around the exterior of the building. An approved turnaround is required if the remaining
distance to an approved intersecting roadway, as measured along the fire apparatus access road, is greater
than 150 feet. (UFC Sec. 902.2.1) • .
No tyrnaround Will be required fpr fire apparatus.
Z) FIR€APPARAT�fS ACCE�S ROAQ WIDTH AND VERTICAL C�EARANCE: Fire apparatus access roads
shall have an unqbstructed width of not less than 20 feet(15 feet for one or two dwelling units and put
buildings), and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.1)
Where fire apparatus roadways are less than 28 feet wide, "NO PARKING" signs shall be installed on both
sides of the roadway and in turnarounds as needed. Where fire apparatus roadways are more than 28 feet
wide but less than 32 feet wide, "NO PARKING" signs shall be installed on one side of the roadway and in
� turnarounds as needed. Where fire apparatus roadways are 32 feet wide or more, parking is not restricted.
(UFC Sec. 902.2.4) �
3) SURFACE AND LOAD CAPACITIES: Fire apparatus access roads shall be of an all-weather surface that is
easily distinguishable from the surrounding area and is capable of supporting not less than 12,500 pounds
point load (wheel load) and 50,000 pounds live load (gross vehicle weight). You may need to provide
documentation from a registered engineer that the design will be capable of supporting such loading.
Documentation from a registered engineer that the finished construction is in accordance with the approved
plans or the requirements of the Fire Code may be requested. (Design criteria on back)(UFC Sec. 902.2.2)
4) TURNING RADIUS: The inside turning radius and outside turning radius shall be not less than 25 feet and
45 feet respectively, measured from the same center point. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.3)
5) NO PARKING SIGNS: Where fire apparatus roadways are not of sufficient width to accommodate parked
vehicles and 20 feet of unobstructed driving surface, "No Parking" signs shall be installed on one or both
sides of the roadway and in turnarounds as needed. (UFC Sec. 902.2.4) Signs shall read "NO PARKING -
FIRE LANE -TOW AWAY ZONE, ORS 98.810 - 98.812" and shall be installed with a clear space above
prade Ia�r�I o�7�eet. Si�n�sha�l;b@ �2 inch�s wide by 18�in�hes.hi�l�.,and�hall have p�apk.qr,fe,d�,atter.s �. � �
. .. . =-- end berder•orr a whlte b cKgi�Ctrtd:' �C�FC`$ec. 9b�'.4.5.1)= �ee�d�lagram�on�iack)
6) RG ADE: Private fire apparatus access roadway grades shall not exceed an average grade of 10 percent
with a maxlmum grade of 15 percent for lengths of no more than 200 feet. Intersections and turnarounds
shall be level (maximum 5°/o)with the exception of crowning for water run-off. Public streets shall have a
maximum grade of 15%. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.6)
7) SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES - FIRE HYDRANTS: Fire hydrants for single family
dwellings, duplexes and sub-divisions, shall be placed at each intersection. Intermediate fire hydrants are
required if any portion of a structure exceeds 500 feet from a hydrant at an intersection as measured in an
7401 SW Washo Court,Suite 101 •Tualatin,Oregon 97062•Tel.(503)612-7000•Fax(503)612-7003•www.tvfr.com
� apprroved manner around the outside of the structure and along approv�_ .,��e apparatus access roadways.
Placement of additional fire hydrants shall be as approved by the Chief. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.2)
8) SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS - REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: The minimum available fire flow for single family
dwellings and duplexes shall be 1,000 gallons per minute. If the structure(s) is(are) 3,600 square feet or
larger, the required fire flow shall be determined according to UFC Appendix Table A-III-A-1. (UFC
Appendix III-A, Sec. 5)
9) ACCESS AND FIRE FIGHTING WATER SUPPLY DURING CONSTRUCTION: Approved fire apparatus
access roadways and fire fighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to any other
construction on the site or subdivision. (UFC Sec. 8704)
Please contact me at (503) 612-7010 with any additional questions.
Sincerely,
Eric T . McMullen
Eric T. McMullen
Deputy Fire Marshal
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
DATE: 9/9/03
TO: Matt Scheidegger, Associate Planner
FROM: Kim McMillan, Development Review Engineer.��
RE: MLP2003-00011 Pacific Crest Partners Partition
Access Management (Section 18.705.030.H�
Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with
all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and
streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and
deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and
AASHTO.
The applicant has indicated that vision clearance areas can be met and that sight
distance to the north is currently unobstructed. The applicanYs engineer shall
provide sight distance certification for the proposed shared access prior to
approval of the final plat.
Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be
placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections.
Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic
commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway
setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be150 feet,
measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat
of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the
influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact
report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a
project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore
any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is
not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the
intersection as possible.
Both Oak and Locust Streets are classified as collector streets. The proposed
shared access onto 90th Avenue is located approximately 310 feet from Locust
Street and 450 feet from Oak Street, thereby meeting this criterion.
Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways
and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of
driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum
spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2003-00011 Pacific Crest Partition PAGE 1
SW 90th Avenue is classified as a local street; therefore this standard does not
apply to the proposed driveway.
Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810�
Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of
public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and
drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below:
Streets:
Improvements:
Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets
adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards.
Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width
planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved
in accordance with the TDC.
Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a
local street to have a 54 right-of-way width and 32-foot paved section. Other
improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and
bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street
trees.
This site lies adjacent to SW 90th Avenue, which is classified as a local street on
the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 25
feet of ROW from centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map.
The applicant should dedicate ROW to provide 27 feet from centerline.
SW 90th Avenue is currently paved, but not fully improved to City standards. In
order to mitigate the impact from this development, the applicant should sign a
Restrictive Covenant for future street improvements.
Future Street Plan and Extension of Streets: Section 18.810.030.F states
that a future street plan shall be filed which shows the pattern of existing and
proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land division.
This section also states that where it is necessary to give access or permit a
satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to the
boundary lines of the tract to be developed and a barricade shall be
constructed at the end of the street. These street stubs to adjoining
properties are not considered to be cul-de-sacs since they are intended to
continue as through streets at such time as the adjoining property is
developed. A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2003-00011 Pacific Crest Partition PAGE 2
property owners which shall not be removed until authorized by the City
Engineer, the cost of which shall be included in the street construction cost.
Temporary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de-sac bulbs shall be
constructed for stub streets in excess of 150 feet in length.
The applicant has indicated that there is not an opportunity for future street
connections through this development due to the wetlands area on the west side of
this property. Staff concurs with this assessment.
Private Streets: Section 18.810.030.T states that design standards for
private streets shall be established by the City Engineer. The City shall
require legal assurances for the continued maintenance of private streets,
such as a recorded maintenance agreement. Private streets serving more
than six dwelling units are permitted only within planned developments,
mobile home parks, and multi-family residential developments.
The applicant has indicated that this partition will provide a 10 foot paved shared
access within a 15 foot easement. The applicant has also indicated that the
adjacent pa�tition will be providing the same section on their property. The two
combined will provide a 20 foot private street within a 30 foot access easement
be recorded such that all four properties created will have full use of the entire
private street.
The applicant shall place a statement on the face of the final plat indicating the
private street(s) will be owned and maintained by the properties that will be
served by iUthem. The City's public improvement design standards require
private streets to have a pavement section equal to a public local street. The
applicant will need to provide this type of pavement section.
Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape
of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building
sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient
access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of
limitations and opportunities of topography.
Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks
formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of-
way line except:
• Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or
other bodies of water or, pre-existing development or;
• For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, major
collectors or railroads.
• For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides
equivalent access.
PLANNING
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2003-00011 Pacific Crest Partition PAGE 3
Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections
on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street
connection is not possible. Spacing between connections shall be no
more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or
topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict
adherence to other standards in the code.
PLANNING
Lots -Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being
more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5
times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district.
PLANNING
Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of
frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land
partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a
minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access
easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling
unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet.
PLANNING
Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to
meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial,
collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets
shall have sidewalks on at least one side.
The applicant will be required to sign a Restrictive Covenant for future street
improvements, which will include the construction of sidewalks along the frontage
of SW 90th Avenue.
The private street that will serve the four lots (2 lots for this partition and 2 lots for
the adjacent partition) will be required to construct sidewalks on at least one side.
Sanitary Sewers:
Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be
installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to
existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and
Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as
adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future
revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive
plan.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2003-00011 Pacific Crest Partition PAGE 4
Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems
shall include consideration of additional development within the area as
projected by the Comprehensive Plan.
The applicanYs plan indicate that a new, 8-inch public sewer will be constructed
from the sewer in 90th Avenue to the lots. A public easement will be required for
a portion of the sewer line. The applicant will be required to provide a copy of the
recorded easement prior to construction.
Storm Drainage:
General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make
adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff.
Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a
culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate
potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or
outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary
size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction
Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by
Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or
amendments).
There is no significant upstream drainage way. Any upstream runoff entering the
project access area will be collected in the proposed catch basin.
Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it
is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from
the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and
Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have
been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions
have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the
development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards
for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water
Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments).
In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek
and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that
plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater
detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net
increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that
all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surFaces provide
onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno
Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff
will be permitted to discharge without detention.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2003-00011 Pacific Crest Partition PAGE 5
Developments of this small size, especially residential land partitions, are not
required to provide on-site detention. The applicant will be required to pay the
water quantity SDC upon application for the building permits.
The applicanYs plans indicate that runoff will be collected and discharged to the
existing wetland to the west. The plans provide for a rip-rap outfall for energy
dissipation and erosion control.
Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways:
Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments
adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted
pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of
such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way.
SW 90th Avenue is not designated as a bicycle facility.
Utilities:
Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those
required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services
and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface
mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter
cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service
facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at
50,000 volts or above, and:
• The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving
utility to provide the underground senrices;
• The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted
facilities;
• All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains
installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the
surfacing of the streets; and
• Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing
the street improvements when service connections are made.
Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states
that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the
development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities
which are not underground will serve the development and the approval
authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-
grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in
conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2003-00011 Pacific Crest Partition PAGE 6
by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a
short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the
placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground
utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by
utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public
right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-
grounding.
There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW 90th Avenue. If
the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage
that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 15 lineal feet;
therefore the fee would be $ 412.50.
ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND
UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS:
Public Water System:
Tualatin Valley Water District provides public water service in this area. The
applicant will need to contact N Water Distract for a new water service upon
construction of the new homes.
Storm Water Quality:
The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM)
regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and
Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which
require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities
shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100
percent of the storm water runoff generated f�om newly created impervious
surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the
frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained
through the year.
The CWS standards include a provision that would exclude small projects such
as residential land partitions. It would be impractical to require an on-site water
quality facility to accommodate treatment of the storm water from 2 parcels.
Rather, the CWS standards provide that applicants should pay a fee-in-lieu of
constructing a facility, if deemed appropriate. Staff recommends payment of the
fee-in-lieu on this application.
Address Assignments:
The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the
City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2003-00011 Pacific Crest Partition PAGE 7
in the amount of$ 30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to
the City prior to final plat approval.
For this project, the addressing fee will be $60.00 (2 lots and/or tracts X
$30/address = $60.00).
The developer will also be required to provide signage at the entrance of each
shared flag lot driveway or private street that lists the addresses that are served
by the given driveway or street. This will assist emergency services personnel to
more easily find a particular home.
Survey Requirements
The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates [NAD 83 (91)] on
two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic
control nefin►ork (GC 22). These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be
of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the
coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements
to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates
can be established by:
• GPS tie nefinrorked to the City's GPS survey.
• By random traverse using conventional surveying methods.
In addition, the applicant's as-built drawings shall be tied to the GPS network.
The applicant's engineer shall provide the City with an electronic file with points
for each structure (manholes, catch basins, water valves, hydrants and other
water system features) in the development, and their respective X and Y State
Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD 83 (91).
Recommendations:
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO
APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT:
Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642)
for review and approval:
. Prior to commencing onsite improvements, a Public Facility Improvement
(PFI) permit is required for this project to cover the sewer tap and
construction and any other work in the public right-of-way. Six (6) sets of
detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the
Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any
drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2003-00011 Pacific Crest Partition PAGE 8
relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit
plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards,
which are available at City Hall and the City's web page
(www.ci.tigard.or.us).
. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address
and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be
designated as the "Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance
for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a
corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which
the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact
person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering
Department will delay processing of project documents.
. Prior to final plat approval the applicant shall construct sidewalks along at
least one side of the private street.
. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the
amount of$60.00. (STAFF CONTACT: Shirley Treat, Engineering).
. The applicant shall execute a Restrictive Covenant whereby they agree to
complete or participate in the future improvements of SW 90th Avenue
adjacent to the subject property, when any of the following events occur:
A. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or
paid for by the formation of a Local Improvement District,
B. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or
paid for in whole or in part by the City or other public agency,
C. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be constructed
by a third party and involves the sharing of design and/or construction
expenses by the third party owner(s) of property in addition to the
subject property, or
D. when construction of the improvements is deemed to be appropriate
by the City Engineer in conjunction with construction of improvements
by others adjacent to the subject site.
. The final plat shall show the dedication of ROW on 90�h Avenue to provide
27 feet from centerline.
. The applicant shall cause a statement to be placed on the final plat to
indicate that the proposed private street(s) will be jointly owned and
maintained by the private property owners who abut and take access from it
(them).
. The applicant's plan shall show a public sewer extension from SW gptn
Avenue to the proposed development.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2003-00011 Pacific Crest Partition PAGE 9
. The applicant shall obtain approval from the Tualatin Valley Water District for
the proposed water connection prior to issuance of the City's Public Facility
Improvement permit.
. The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two
monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic
control network (GC 22). These monuments shall be on the same line and
shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary.
Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert
ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to
grid north. These coordinates can be established by:
• GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey.
• By random traverse using conventional surveying methods.
. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements:
A. Submit for City review four (4) paper copies of the final plat prepared
by a land surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or
narrative.
B. Attach a check in the amount of the current final plat review fee
(Contact Planning/Engineering Permit Technicians, at (503) 639�171, ext.
426).
C. The final plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum
standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05),
Washington County, and by the City of Tigard.
D. The right-of-way dedication for 90th Avenue shall be made on the final
plat.
E. NOTE: Washington County will not begin their review of the final plat
until they receive notice from the Engineering Department indicating that the
City has reviewed the final plat and submitted comments to the applicant's
surveyor.
F. After the City and County have reviewed the final plat, submit two mylar
copies of the final plat for City Engineer signature (for partitions), or City
Engineer and Community Development Director signatures (for
subdivisions).
. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant's professional engineer shall
provide a sight distance certification for the proposed access onto SW gptn
Avenue.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2003-00011 Pacific Crest Partition PAGE 10
,
. The applicant's constn.iction drawings shall show that the pavement and
rock section for the proposed private street(s) shall meet the City's public
street standard for a local residential street.
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS:
Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642)
for review and approval:
. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide the
Engineering Department with a "photomylar" copy of the recorded final plat.
. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide the City with
as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) 3 mil mylar, 2) a
diskette of the as-builts in "DWG"format, if available; otherwise "DXF"will be
acceptable, and 3) the as-built drawings shall be tied to the City's GPS
nefinrork. The applicanYs engineer shall provide the City with an electronic
file with points for each structure (manholes, catch basins, water valves,
hydrants and other water system features) in the development, and their
respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD 83 (91).
. Any necessary off-site utility easements shall be the responsibility of the
applicant to obtain and shall be submitted to and accepted by the City prior
to issuance of a building permit.
. The applicant shall provide signage at the entrance of each shared flag lot
driveway or private street that lists the addresses that are served by the
given driveway or street.
. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW
90th Avenue underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee
in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the
site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 27.50 per lineal foot. If the
fee option is chosen, the amount will be $ 412.50 and it shall be paid prior to
issuance of building permits.
. Prior to issuance of the building permit for Parcels 1 & 2, the applicant shall
pay the standard water quality and water quantity fees per lot (fee amounts
will be the latest approved by CWS).
. The 25-foot undisturbed buffer shall be shown on the construction plans.
The sensitive area boundary and/or buffer shall be staked in the field
throughout the construction process in order to protect the sensitive area.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2003-00011 Pacific Crest Partition PAGE 11
� � �`�� MMENTS �
l REQUEST FOR CO cmorn�e►tto
�t� Conrmunity�D�vcCopme,�ot
S�iaptngA Better L'ommunity
DATE: A�gus�n.2oos
T0: ltialatim Vaile Wat�r oistrict Adminiatrative Oifices �
FROM: C` of Ti ard Plan in ivlslo�
STAFF CONTqCT; Mathew e er Assoclata Plawner[x24311
Phone• 31639�4171/F�[: [50316847297
MIMOR LAND P OM IMLlI 2003-00011
ST PARTNERS PARTlT10N Q
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to perForm � two-lot partition on a parcel of land
containing approximately 17,860 square feet. This partition will create Parcel #1 with approximately 7,764
square feet, and Parcel #2 with approximately 8,222 square feet. LOCATION 10230 SW 90�' Avenue;
WCTM 1 S135AA, Tax Lot 901. ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning
district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential
units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-fami(y units are
permitted condi�ionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally.
APPLICABLE 12E�VIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.51�,
18.705, 18.715, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
Attached are the Site Plan, Vlcinity Map and Applicant's Information far your review. From information supplied by
va�ious departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will
be prepar�d and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this
1� iEli�I���'��t '�;�^ ��������' ��I�I,��'i��� ��� r���8i� I I����'�lQ��l��,��� ' �.��� You may use the space provided
application, �
below or attach a separate letter to retum your comments. ff ou are unable to res ond b the above date please
phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as sovn as possible. If
you have any questions, contact the Tgard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223.
!p,i� i''' ��!�HE�� �;TWE'iF,,,pLLO�INGi��TEMS�iTk�a�Y.'A�P����I�ii������
�
We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
^ Please refer to the enclosed letter.
� Written comments provided below:
Name&Number of Person Commentin L ��f�'� Q 2�
�Pi�+-�/ ✓
Z00/TOO�j %V3 �8�80 £OOZ/VT/80
• �
REQUEST FOR CQMMENTS CITYOFTIOARD
Community�De�aeCopment
SFiaping�BetterCammunity
DATE: August 11,2003
T0: Dennis Koellermeier,Operations Manager/Water Department
FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division
STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Associate Planner[x24311
Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-1291
MINOR LAND PARTITION[MLPI 2003-00011
➢ PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION Q
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to perform a two-lot partition on a parcel of land
containing approximately 17,860 square feet. This partition will create Parcel #1 with approximately 7,764
square feet, and Parcel #2 with approximately 8,222 square feet. LOCATION 10230 SW 90th Avenue;
WCTM 1 S135AA, Tax Lot 901. ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning
district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential
units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are
permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally.
APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.510,
18.705, 18.715, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Information for your review. From information supplied by
various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will
be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this
application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: AUGUST 25, 2003. You may use the space provided
below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If vou are unable to respond bv the above date, please
phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If
you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
� We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
_ Written comments provided below:
D+�� /�✓►�� �-
Name 8� Number of Person Commenting:
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITYOFTIOARD
Community�DeveCopment
ShapingA Better Community
DATE: August 11,2003
T0: !im Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer
FROM: City of Tigard Planning Di�ision
STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheide9ger,Associate Planner[x243A
Phone: [503)639-4111/fax: [5031684-729)
MINOR LAND PARTITION[MLPI 2003-00011
➢ PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION Q
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to perform a two-lot partition on a parcel of land
containing approximately 17,860 square feet. This partition will create Parcel #1 with approximately 7,764
square feet, and Parcel #2 with approximately 8,222 square feet. LOCATION 10230 SW 90�' Avenue;
WCTM 1 S135AA, Tax Lot 901. ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning
district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential
units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are
permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally.
APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.510,
18.705, 18.715, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Information for your review. From information supplied by
various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will
be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this
application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: AUGUST 25, 2003. You may use the space provided
below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If vou are unable to respond bv the above date, please
phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If
you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
_ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
_ Written comments provided below:
Name 8� Number of Person Commenting: � �o�[` � 2�
.�
REQUEST FOR COMMEHTS CITYOFTIGARD
�'ommunity�DeveCopment
ShapingA Better Community
on�: au9ustn,2oo3 REC�IVED PLANNING
T0: Barbara Shields,Long Range Planning Manager
AUG 1 2 2003
FROM: Ci�l of Ti9ard Plannin9 Diuision CITY OF TIGARD
STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Associate Planner[x243n
Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-1291
MINOR LAND PARTITION[MLPI 2003-00011
➢ PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION Q
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to perForm a finro-lot partition on a parcel of land
containing approximately 17,860 square feet. This partition will create Parcel #1 with approximately 7,764
square feet, and Parcel #2 with approximately 8,222 square feet. LOCATION 10230 SW 90th Avenue;
WCTM 1 S135AA, Tax Lot 901. ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning
district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential
units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are
permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally.
APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.510,
18.705, 18.715, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Information for your review. From information supplied by
various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will
be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this
application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: AUGUST 25, 2003. You may use the space provided
below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond bY the above date, please
phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If
you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
_ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our o�ce.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
_ Written comments provided below:
Name 8� Number of Person Commenting:
. .
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITYOFTIGARD
�'ommunity�DeveCopment
ShapingA�etter Community
DATE: Au9us[11.2003
T0: Mark Vandomelen,Residential Plans Examiner
FROM: Cit�of Ti9ard Planning Division
STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Associate Planner[x24311
Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-T291
MINOR LAND PARTITION[MLPI 2003-00011
➢ PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION Q
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to perform a two-lot partition on a parcel of land
containing approximately 17,860 square feet. This partition will create Parcel #1 with approximately 7,764
square feet, and Parcel #2 with approximately 8,222 square feet. LOCATION 10230 SW 90�h Avenue;
WCTM 1 S135AA, Tax Lot 901. ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning
district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential
units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are
permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally.
APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.510,
18.705, 18.715, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Information for your review. From information supplied by
various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a repo�t and recommendation will
be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this
application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: AUGUST 25, 2003. You may use the space provided
below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If vou are unable to respond bv the above date, please
phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If
you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
_ Written comments provided below:
Name&Number of Person Commenting:
. �
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITYOFTIGARD
�'ommunity�l�eveCopment
ShapingA Better Colnmunity
DATE: August 11,2003
T0: PER ATTACHED
fROM: CitY of Tigard Planning Division
STAfF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Associate Planner[x24311
Phone: [5031639-41)1/fax: [5031684-7291
MINOR LAND PARTITION[MLPI 2003-00011
➢ PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION Q
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to perform a two-lot partition on a parcel of land
containing approximately 17,860 square feet. This partition will create Parcel #1 with approximately 7,764
square feet, and Parcel #2 with approximately 8,222 square feet. LOCATION 10230 SW 90�' Avenue;
WCTM 1 S135AA, Tax Lot 901. ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning
district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential
units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are
permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally.
APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.510,
18.705, 18.715, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and ApplicanYs Information for your review. From information supplied by
various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will
be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this
application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: AUGUST 25. 2003. You may use the space provided
below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond bv the above date, please
phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If
you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
_ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
_ Written comments provided below:
Name 8�Number of Person Commenting:
�
' ' CITII r TIGARD REQUEST FOR C01�.. �ENTS
NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS
FILE NOS.: ���- �� � FILE NAME: � C�" �s�d'
�CITUEN INYOLVEMENT TEAMS
14-DAY PENDING APPLICATION NOTICE TO CIT AREA: ❑Central �East ❑South ❑West �Proposal Descrip.in Library CIT Book
CITY Of CES
�LONG RANGE PLANNING/Barbara Shields,Planning Mgr. COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPTJPIanning-Engineering Techs. � POLICE DEPTJJim Woif,Crime Preventan Officer
.�BUILDING DIVISIONlGary Lampella,Building Official �ENGINEERING DEPTJKim McMillan,Dvlpmnt.Review Engineer�WATER DEPTJDennis Koellemieier,Public Works Mgr.
CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,City Recorder PUBLIC WORKS/John Roy,Property Manager _PUBLIC WORKS/Matt Stine,Urban Forester
�PLANNER—POST PROJECT SITE IF A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM-10 BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARINGI
SPECIAL DISTRICTS
_ TUAL.HILLS PARK 8 REC.DIST.+i�ZUALATIN VALLEY FIRE 8 RESCUE+t �TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT� _ CLEANWATER SERVICES�
Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Lee WalkedSWM Program
15707 SW Walker Road 'Washington County Fire District PO 8ox 745 155 N.First Avenue
Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124
LOCAL AND STATE IURISDICflONS
CITY OF BEAVERTON � CITY OF TUALATIN� OR.DEPT.OF FISH�WILDLIFE _OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS
_ Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue Jennifer Goodridge
Irish Bunnell,o��«.s� 18880 SW Martinaui Avenue PO Box 59 775 Summer Street NE
PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portiand,OR 97207 Salem,OR 97301-1279
Beaverton,OR 97076
_ OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM.
METRO-LAND USE 8 PLANNING� _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.8 MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE
_ CITY OF DURHAM � 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380
City Manager Porttand.OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232
PO Box 23483 _ Bob Knight,Dala Rewurce Cerrter(ZCM) US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG.
Durham,OR 97281-3483 Paulette Allen,GiowlhManapemenlCoordk�ator OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.B DVLP Kathryn Harris
_ Mel Huie,cree�scxesca000�«ccawzon� Larry French�co�w.au�,a�,a��nso�y� Routing CENWP-OP-G
CITY OF KING CITY� _ Jennifer Budhabhatti,R�b�a�tw�> 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 PO Box 2946
City Manager _ C.D.Manager,GrowMManapemerNServices Sa�em,OR 97301-2540 Portland,OR 9720&2946
15300 SW 116th Avenue
King City,OR 97224 WASHINGTON COUNTY�IF
OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY�rowanmes�nnrea> _OR.DEPT OF AVIATION�ManoPoNTwwrsl Dept.of Land Use 8 Transp.
Bonneville Power Administration Tom Highland,Pu� 155 N.First Avenue
CITY OF LAKE 05WEG0� Routing TTRC-Attn: Renae Fercera 3040 25th Street,SE Suite 350,MS 13
Planning Director PO Box 3621 5alem,OR 97310 Hillsboro.OR 97124
PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 Brent Curtis tcan�
Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Gregg Leion�cPa�
_ OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ODOT,REGION 1 � Anne LaMountain nc�uuaa�
CITY OF PORTLAND cr,o��y ro�w�uv,os e�d P�ern�i e�w��merna�m�u� _Marah Danielson,Devebpment Review CooNinator Phil Healy perwRe�
Planning Bureau Director Regional Administrator Carl Toland, Right-of-Way Section cv�b�� Steve Conwaycce���nvus.�
1900 SW 4'"Avenue,Suite 4100 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders Sr.CaRographer ror�rzc�>MS,.
Portland,OR 97201 Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 Jim Nims czc��MS�s
_Doria Mateja czc�>Ms,.
WA.CO.CONSOLIDATED COMMUNIC.AGENCY(WCCCA)"971"(ronopoN rwwnl ODOT,REGION 1 -DI5TRICT 2A�
Dave Austin Jane Estes,PemMSpedalist
PO Box 6375 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350
BeaveRon,OR 97007-0375 Portland,OR 97221-2414
UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL A6ENCIES
PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Bur�ington Northem/Santa Fe R/R Predecessor)
Robert I.Melbo,President&General Manager
110 W. 10th Avenue
Albany,OR 97321
SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS COMCAST CABLE CORP. _TRI-MET TRANSIT WLPMT.
Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmertnn,ex�uo�o�y> Randy Bice c9..M��N..c�> p(PmjectisWRhn%MibofaTransRROUIe)
5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Ben Baldwin,Project Planner
Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street
Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland.OR 97232
� PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC X NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY VERIZON �QWEST COMMUNICATIONS
Ken Gutierrez,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord. Ken Perdue,Engineering Patty Stambaugh,Engineering
9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue PO Box 1100 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110
Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland.OR 97209-3991 BeaveRon,OR 97075-1100 PoRland,OR 97219
�TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL D15T.#23J BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 COMCAST CABLE CORP. COMCAST CABLE CORP.
Marsha Butler,Administrative Offices Jan Youngquist,Demographics Alex Silantiev cs..��N..�„ Diana Carpenter,�,,.e«�..�+a�,
6960 SW Sandburg Street 16550 SW Merlo Road 9605 SW Nimbus Avenue,Bldg.12 3500 SW Bond Street
Tigard,OR 97223-8039 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Beaverton,OR 97008 Portland,OR 97232
+IF INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN 500'OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTT FOR ANY/ALL
CITY PROJECTS(Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notifr). r,:aatey�mastersutequest Fa Commencs Notircation ust.doc (UPDATED: 17-Ju1-03)
(Also update:"i:lcurpin�setupUabe151annexaGOn_ulilities and frenchises.doc'when updating this document)
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING �nYOFt,aARo
Community�DeveCapme�it
Shapingll BetterCommunity
I, �Patricia G. Gunsf or�' being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a SeniorAdministrative SpeciaCut for
the �'ity of7'rgar� �Gl�ashington County, Oregon and that I served the following:
(Check Appropnate Box(s)Below}
� NOTICE OF DECISION fOR: MLP2003-0001 I/PACIFI� fREST PARTNERS PARTITION
❑ AMENDED NOTIGE (File No./Name Reference)
� City of Tigard Planning Director
A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhlblt"A",and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to
each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhlblt"B",and by reference made a part
hereof, on September 16,2003, and deposited in the United States Mail on Septemper 16,2003, postage prepaid.
/�
/ - ' �`
�
(Pe at Prep e otice)
,57,A2E D�'O�EC'jON )
Coun�jr of'Was�tngton )ss.
C'ity of�rrgard ) ,
Subscribed and sworn/affi med before me on the day of , 2003.
OFFICIAL SEAL
��° J BENOTSON
cornMiss oni No sss as 6 �
`MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APR.27,2007
IHy commission Expires: 'T a �
� � EX
NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION
MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2003-00011 �
CITY OF TIGARD
PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION c°mmu'�'�y`°e�eropment
S(aping f7�BetterCommunity
120 DAYS = 12/3/2003
SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY
FILE NAME: PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION
CASE NO: Minor Land Partition (MLP) MLP2003-00011
PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of a two-lot partition on a parcel of land
containing approximately 17,860 square feet. This partition will create Parcel #1
with approximately 7,764 square feet, and Parcel #2 with approximately 8,222
square feet.
APPLICANT: Pacific Crest Partners, Inc. PROPERTY OWNER: Same
Attn: Dan Boyden
1430 Eastside Road
Hood River, OR 97031
ZONING
DESIGNATION: R-4.5 Low Density Residential. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to
accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential
units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-
family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also
permitted conditionally.
LOCATION: The subject property is located off of SW 90�h Avenue, where 90th Avenue
intersects with recently vacated SW Maple Street; WCTM 1 S135AA, Tax Lot 901.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715,
18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
SECTION II. DECISION
Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has
APPROVED the above request. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted
in the full decision, available at City Hall.
THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS
FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION.
All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or
copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25G) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the
time of the request.
SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION
Notice:
oT�tice mailed to:
X The applicant and owners
—� Owner of record within the required distance
—� Affected government agencies
Final Decision:
THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON SEPTEMBER 16, 2003 AND BECOMES
EFFECTIVE ON OCTOBER 1, 2003 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED.
Appeal:
The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are
otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may
appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community
Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed
with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The
appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW
Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223.
Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be
confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the
comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may
be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that
may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body.
THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON SEPTEMBER 30, 2003.
Questions:
For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Mathew Scheideqger at
(503) 639-4171 , Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223.
_,_.., __,T _� _�II, ?- ,_—,— _ _
q— - - - , -_-_, ;-—�- 1 - -- 1
_ -- ma�urir nar
CORAL ST
_�_ = MLP2003-0001f
PACIfIC CREST
J ' PARTNERS
� PARTITION
� -�-ST ._ � _
�' �;---� ��� -_� '
�,r �
�� �; o
i l— �' — '�� m ��:
�—
�— -� �aa� I�� w� -- _---
APLELEAF T W`—t��' I� Q I � � � i�
— � -�Q� ��� --_�;
i �� �
,�
,
� _�..o� �;
, , , ,
I
--� _
�. � ��---� � .
/ i �7---� N
OD JI
� ✓ �_ �.r.c � I .
iil ' _' ��_ I _ � � II
I / , Cih o(Tignr�f
� I �
I , � ....�;��,�;.�.
�� m� �, � � - -----
� N I —___"____ 1'� !3()f� 'I
TL 1�0 � I �r TL 906 �" '_______'_.'i I
� � Pafi:ef 1 h-/�' I
� � iL auo � i
L__'__'
�_� . :v'.%;' S ___-
I �� i
J i � '
, '-—��.Pae�zs w.an. i
tAPLE STREET r� ' ^� ..—_ , c:',.. �.oi. . �._
---------I iM r�toatm / /
sn .� .
i �
il tU0 I `
� �_____'__' \ �\/ J
i i � \" y1P
I � j�
i I iL 1002 /� \G�1� 1..
I � ---
� I / Q- i�i
� �------- 0 i i
i 1 � _'04___� i
i � P�v� �� '�
i i n ttoi p i
i '
i i ��0 �
i ' i
� i i ap ' �
' i
� i � i' i
i �__________r____________ �P0 ,' i
i
� � TL 1102 I TL 11J0 TL 401 I
I
i � I I i
I I t��ZDO
I I I I
I i �
,� CIT�r oF n�aRD � MLP2003•00011
�P'�'"' N PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION
Ma is not to scele
I
�
.� .' �I
1S135AB-00203 1S135AA-04800 EXH IBIT� I
ADDERLY DAVID L&SHARON A CAGE JUDITH K �
9120 SW LOCUST ST 10199 SW 87TH 'I
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 �
t S 135AA-05000 1 S 135AA-05400
ALBERTSON RICHARD D CALDWELL TANYA L
10255 SW 87TH 10269 SW 87TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135AA-01200 1S135AA-04101
ALLISON M DEAN&DOROTHY D CALLAHAN JAY PATRICK
Uo ALLISON ANNETTE C 8945 SW OAK ST
8870 SW MAPLELEAF ST TIGARD,OR 97223
PORTLAND,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-05900 1 S 135AA-05100
ANTARES GRACE CASANOVA CARL
8811 SW MAPLE CT 10233 SW 87TH
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-03900 1 S 135AA-03901
BAYARD MICHEL L& CHEPIN JOHN
TROWT TOBY ELLEN 8911 SW OAK ST
20555 BOWERY LN TIGARD,OR 97223
BEND,OR 97701
1 S 135AA-03703 1 S 126DD-03500
BRANDT WALDO G CHRISTENSEN ERIC J&
8835 SW OAK ST BARBARA S
TIGARD,OR 97223 8870 SW CORAL
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-00902 7 S 126DD-03002
BROWN JAMES F& CRABTREE DENNIS J AND
HENDERSON-BROWN CHERYL L BEVERLY J
10200 SW 90TH AVE 10020 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-00905 1 S 135AA-06300
B WN JAME F& DAGGETT KATHLEEN K
HEN RS -BROWN CHERYL L 1960 MAPLELEAF DR
10200 OTH AVE LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034
T RD,OR 7223
7 S 135AA-06400 1 S 7 35AB-03200
BRYAN SUSAN J DAVIS EUGENE L&VIVIAN
8770 SW MAPLE CT 10875 SW 89TH ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-05700 1 135AA-90000
BUTORI EUGENE F TRUST& DE R NDOMINIUMS
BUTORI VIRGINIA A TRUST OW OF UNITS
BY BUTORI EUGENE FNIRGINIA A TRS ,
7645 SW CEDAR
PORTLAND,OR 97225
1 S 135AB-00204 1 S 135AA-90002
DICKSON DONALD KEITH HAWLEY HAZEL M
PO BOX 219028 9D55 SW 91ST AVE#7
PORTLAND,OR 97225 PORTLAND,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-01000 1 S 35AA-90009
FINEVIEW FARM LLC HA Y EL M
1430 EASTSIDE RD 9055 1ST AVE#7
HOOD RIVER,OR 97031 R TLAND,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-05500 15135AA-03902
FISH LAURI HAZARD SANDRA
10277 SW 87TH AVE 8914 SW OAKWAY
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
7 S 135AA-90010 1 S 135AA-00802
FLETCHER MARY K HERBERHOLZ LARRY S
10319 SW 87TH AVE 8870 SW LOCUST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 126DD-03000 1 S 135AA-00803
GILE EDWARD S HERBERHOLZ LARRY S&CATHY D
10040 SW 90TH 8870 SW LOCUST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-069D0 1 S 135AA-03707
GILHAM ANGELA HITCH DORIS
8840 SW MAPLE CT 10387 SW 87TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 126DD-03300 1 S 135AA-90008
GOODWIN FRANK O&CHARLENE HOLLAND JEFFREY L&
BY SHELTER MORTGAGE CO DAWN F
9900 SW GREENBURG RD 10315 SW 87TH AVE
PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-05300 1 S 135AA-05800
GRAY BRANDON K 8� JIA WENYI
GRAY MELISSA 8795 SW MAPLE CT
7871 SW KINGFISHER WAY TIGARD,OR 97223
DURHAM,�R 97224
1 S 126DD-03001 1 S 135AA-06600
HALL GLADYS JOHNSON AARON J
Go HEINTZ SUSAN I 8810 SW MAPLE CT
10415 SW 72ND TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-00906 1 S 135AA-O6000
HARRIS BRYAN J 8 GENNIE S KABALIN KATHY J
10230 SW 90TH AVE 8710 SW MAPLE CT
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135AB-03201 1S126DD-02903
KILGORE KIM&PAULA MAZZUCA LOUISE C
10445 SW 90TH AVE 10000 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-07 002 1 S 126DD-02900
KINDRICK CHARLES C AND M CA ISE C
DEBRA A 10000 TH AVE
10320 SW 90TH R TLAND, 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-90004 15126DC-05400
KLUDAS JEAN C METZGER UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
10307 SW 87TH AVE 9055 SW LOCUST
TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223
'1 S 135AA-01101 1 S 135AA-06500
KUHN EUGENE P PAMELA L MILLER PAIGE
10340 SW 90TH 8800 SW MAPLE CT
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-00804 1 S 135AA-00806
LAI KHOAN VAN& MILLS MICHAEL E AND
LE THU THI BEVERLY A
10161 SW JEFFERSON AVE 10211 SW JEFFERSON
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-90005 1 S 135AA-00800
LAIRD SHAWN W 8�LOUISE M NASH GORDON O AND PENNY J
10309 SW 87TH AVENUE 10231 SW JEFFERSON
PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224
1 S 135AA-03800 1 S 135AA-90007
LASHAWAY JULIE A NICKOLICH NAOMI R
Go FINCK DALE M 8 IDA LIFE ESTATE 10313 SW 87TH AVE
8875 SW OAK TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-06800 1 S 135AA-00700
LEVITSKY STAN A& OCF JOSEPH E WESTON
LEVITSKY ALEXANDRIA PUBLIC FOUNDATION
8830 SW MAPLE CT BY WESTON INVESTMENT CO LLC
TIGARD,OR 97223 2154 NE BROADWAY STE 200
PORTLAND,OR 97232
1 S 7 35AA-01102 1 S 126DD-03400
MACLAREN ROBERT P 8 OREGON STATE OF DEPT OF VETS AF
JABLONSKI MILLIE clo WALLOCH R B 8 JEANETTE C-03249
10360 SW 90TH AVE 8890 SW CORAL
TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223
�s�a�Ar+-ossoo �S��an-oosot
MATHEWS SEAN PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS INC
8753 SW MAPLE CT 1430 EASTSIDE RD
TIGARD,OR 97223 HOOD RIVER,OR 97031
1 S 135AA-01100 1 S 135AA-90003
PATERSON BRIAN S&SAMI B SHERWOOD SYDNEY L
10370 SW 90TH AVE 10305 SW 8TTH
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-06100 15135AA-00903
PAZEOTOPOULOS LIZA M SICKLER LEE J
8720 SW MAPLE CT 10024 SW 55TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97219
1S135AB-00202 1S135AA-04000
PENSE JAMES M AND ROXANNE M SMITH ROGER W
9140 SW LOCUST JACQUELYN M
TIGARD,OR 97223 8935 SW OAK ST
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S126DD-03800 1 S135AB-03205
PILGER DENNIS F&ZOE A STANTON KAREN
17703 SW TREETOP WAY 10435 SW 90TH AVE
LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-03705 1 S 7 35AA-04200
ROMERO MERCEDES G AND SUMMIT DORSEY WAYNE
MOLINA MARTHA A PO BOX 230998
10385 SW 87TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97281
TIGARD,OR 97223
7 S 135AA-00401 1 S 135AA-90006
ROWE SHIRLEY I TAYLOR J EDWARD AND
WOOD JUDY NEWSOME-TAYLOR PHYLLIS M
1027 SW GROVER PO BOX 230152
PORTLAND,OR 97201 TIGARD,OR 97281
1 S 135AA-06700 1 135AA-0070
SANTEE JOHN R 8 TIG OF
JUDY A 131 S ALL
8820 SW MAPLE CT GARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 126DC-0b504 1 S 126DG-05503
SCHARBROUGH DONALD AND VANDERYACHT MARK S 8
JOYCE I MARY E
10050 SW 92ND 9125 SW LOCUST ST
PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-04900 1 S 135AA-00805
SCOTT WALTER STEVE 8 TRACY VO VIEN T&
10211 SW 87TH AVE NGUYEN CAM VAN
TIGARD,OR 97223 10181 SW JEFFERSON ST
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135A8-03203 1 S 135AB-00100
SHELDON MELINDA L& WASHINGTON CLACKAMAS CO
DUANE C SCHOOL DIST 23J
10425 SW 90TH AVE 13137 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
� e,
1 S 135AA-00400 1 S 735AA-04600
WEGELE MICHAEL YATES RONALD W
8705 SW LOCUST ST 10155 SW 87TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-00900 1 S 135AA-05200
WEINEL BRETT M ZIMMERMAN DIANA L
8950 SW LOCUST ST 10247 SW 87TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223
1 S126DD-03700
WESTON INVESTMENT CO
2154 NE BROADWAY
PORTLAND,OR 97232
1 S 7 35AA-00904
WILLIAMS LIVING TRUST
BY DONNEL N WILLIAMS&
STEPHANIE S WILLIAMS TRS
13865 SW FERN
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135AA-06200
WINBERG HELEN D
8730 SW MAPLE CT
TIGARD,OR 97223
�St35AA-o�000
WINDWOOD CONSTRUCTION INC
12655 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-07200
W 00 NSTRUCTION INC
12655 ORTH DAKOTA ST
TI ARD,OR 223
1 S 135AAA7100
WI OOD STRUCTION INC
12655 ORTH DAKOTA ST
T RD,OR 23
1 S 135AA-04700
WIN 00 ONSTRUCTION INC
12655 ORTH DAKOTA ST
� RD,OR 23
1 S 135AA-01001
WOLF MARTIN J&GINA K
2550 SW OAKWOOD CT
ALOHA,OR 97006
, � ,
Jack Biethan Josh Thomas
11023 SW Summerfield Drive,#4 10395 SW Bonanza
Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224
Kristen Miller
8940 SW Edgewood Street
Tigard, OR 97223
Paul Owen
10335 SW Highland Drive
Tigard, OR 97224
Louise Fronville
15760 SW Oak Meadow Lane
Tigard, OR 97224
Tim Esau
PO Box 230695
Tigard, OR 97281
Nathan and Ann Murdock
PO Box 231265
Tigard, OR 97281
Ross Sundberg
16382 SW 104th Avenue
Tigard, OR 97224
Brian Wegener
9830 SW Kimberly Drive
Tigard, OR 97224
J. Dyar
10430 SW Century Oak Drive
Tigard, OR 97224
Rex Caffall
13205 SW Village Glenn
Tigard, OR 97223
CITY OF TIGARD - SOUTH fIT SUBCOMMITfEE (pg. I of I) (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT South.doc) UPDATED: November 27, 2002
. i
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITYOFTI6ARD
Cornnrunity�Ueve(opment
S�iapingA BettesCommunity
I, �Patricia L. Lu�ord, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a SeniorAdminutrative SpeciaCut for
the City of Tigar , 'Waskington County, Oregon and that I served the following:
{Check Appropnate Box(s)Below}
❑x NOTICE Of DECISION FOR: MLP2003-0001 I/PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION
❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference)
� City of Tigard Planning Director
A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Elchiblt"A",and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to
each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhlblt"B",and by reference made a part
hereof, on September 16,2003,and deposited in the United States Mail on September 16,2003, postage prepaid.
_ -
. dj
(Pers t Pre re otice)
,5'`�'A2rE OF O�GON )
County of`WasFtngton )ss.
C��y of 2igard )
Subscribed and sworn/affir ed before me on the day of /�fl , 2003.
�
,. OFFICIAL SEAL
�;� `;;, J BHNGTSON
""` • NOTARY PUBUC-0REGON
COMMISSION NO.368086
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APR.27,2007
� � �
� � EXHIBIT�
NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION
,
MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2003-00011 �`
CITY OF TIOARD
PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION c°"�mu"��`��U��pn`�"`
S(:apirtgA�aettcr('ommur�iCy
120 DAYS = 1213/2003
SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY
FILE NAME: PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION
CASE NO: Minor Land Partition (MLP) MLP2003-00011
PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of a finro-lot partition on a parcel of land
containing approximately 17,860 square feet. This partition will create Parcel #1
with approximately 7,764 square feet, and Parcel #2 with approximately 8,222
square feet.
APPLICANT: Pacific Crest Partners, Inc. PROPERTY OWNER: Same
Attn: Dan Boyden
1430 Eastside Road
Hood River, OR 97031
ZONING
DESIGNATION: R-4.5 Low Density Residential. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to
accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential
units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-
family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also
permitted conditionally.
LOCATION: The subject property is located off of SW 90th Avenue, where 90th Avenue
intersects with recently vacated SW Maple Street; WCTM 1 S135AA, Tax Lot 901.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters �8.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715,
18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
SECTION II. DECISION
Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has
APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the
decision is based are noted in Section V.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00�11/PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION PAGE 1 OF 17
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT:
u mit to t e anning epartment at ew c ei egger, , ext. or review an
approval:
1. Submit a plan showing proper screening of the access drive from tax lot 906 according to Section
18.745.040 of the Tigard Development Code.
2. Record access and maintenance agreements for the proposed parcels and submit a signed copy
to the City.
3. Submit a plan showing the proposed access drive with street trees planted in accordance with
Section 18.745.040.C.
4. Provide a tree plan indicating the size, removal, mitigation and protection of all trees located on
the site.
Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and
approval:
5. Prior to commencing onsite improvements, a Public Facility Improvement PFI) permit is required
for this project to cover the sewer tap and construction and any other wor in the public right-of-
way: Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans.shall be submitted for review to the
Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the
Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public Facility
Improvement (PFI) permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design
Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ci.tigard.or.us).
6. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number
of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permittee", and who will
provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is
a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is
incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate
information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents.
7. Prior to final plat approval the applicant shall construct sidewalks along at least one side of the
private street.
8. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of $60.00.
(STAFF CONTACT: Shirley Treat, Engineering).
9. The applicant shall execute a Restrictive Covenant whereby they agree to complete or participate
in the future improvements of SW 90th Avenue adjacent to the sub�ect property, when any of the
following events occur:
A. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for by the
formation of a Local Improvement District,
B. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for in whole or in
part by the City or other public agency,
C. when the improvements are par� of a larger project to be constructed by a third party and
involves the sharing of design and/or construction expenses by the third party owner(s) of
property in addition to the subject property, or
D. when construction of the improvements is deemed to be appropriate by the City Engineer
in conjunction with construction of improvements by others adjacent to the subject site.
10. The final plat shall show the dedication of ROW on 90th Avenue to provide 27 feet from
centerline.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00011/PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION PAGE 2 OF 17
11. The applicant shall cause a statement to be placed on the final plat to indicate that the proposed
private street(s)will be jointly owned and maintained by the private property owners who abut and
take access from it (them).
12. The applicanYs plan shall show a public sewer extension from SW 90th Avenue to the proposed
development.
13. The applicant shall obtain approval from the Tualatin Valley Water District for the proposed water
connection prior to issuance of the City's Public Facility Improvement permit.
14. The applicanYs final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to
the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network (GC 22). These monuments
shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat
boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground
measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates
can be established by:
. GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey.
. By random traverse using conventional surveying methods.
15. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements:
A. Submit for City review four (4) paper copies of the final plat prepared by a land surveyor
licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative.
B. Attach a check in the amount of the current final plat review fee (Contact
Planning/En ineering Permit Technicians, at (503) 639-4171, ext. 2421).
C. The final pla� and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by
the Oregon Revised Statutes (OF��S 92.05), Washington County, and by the City of Tigard.
D. The right-of-way dedication for 90 Avenue shall be made on the final plat.
E. NOTE: Washington County will not begin their review of the final plat until they receive
notice from the Engineering Department indicating that the City has reviewed the final plat
and submitted comments to the applicant's surveyor.
F. After the City and County have reviewed the final plat, submit two mylar copies of the final
plat for City Engineer signature (for partitions), or City Engineer and Community
Development Director signatures (for subdivisions).
16. Prior to final plat approval, the applicanYs professional engineer shall provide a sight distance
certification for the proposed access onto SW 90th Avenue.
17. The applicant's construction drawings shall show that the pavement and rock section for the
proposed private street(s) shall meet the City's public street standard for a local residential street.
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS:
u mit to t e ngineering epartment im c i an, , ext. or review an
approval:
18. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with
a "photomylar" copy of the recorded final plat.
19. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of
the public improvements as follows: 1) 3 mil mylar, 2) a diskette of the as-builts in "DWG" format,
if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable, and 3) the as-built drawings shall be tied to the
City's GPS network. The applicant's engineer shall provide the City with an electronic file with
points for each structure (manholes, catch basins, water valves, hydrants and other water system
features) in the development, and their respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates, referenced
to NAD 83 (91).
20. Any necessary off-site utility easements shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain and
shall be submitted to and accepted by the City prior to issuance of a building permit.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00011/PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION PAGE 3 OF 17
21. The applicant shall provide signage at the entrance of each shared flag lot driveway or private
street that lists the addresses that are served by the given driveway or street.
22. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW 90th Avenue
underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding The fee
shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $27.50
per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $412.50 and it shall be paid prior to
issuance of building permits.
23. Prior to issuance of the building permit for Parcels 1 & 2, the applicant shall pay the standard
water quality and water quantity fees per lot (fee amounts will be the latest approved by Clean
Water Services (CWS).
24. The 25-foot undisturbed buffer shall be shown on the construction plans. The sensitive area
boundary and/or buffer shall be staked in the field throughout the construction process in order to
protect the sensitive area.
THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN (18)
MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION NOTED UNDER
THE PROCESS AND APPEAL SECTION OF THIS DECISION.
SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Pro ert Histo :
e su �ect parcel is located within the City of Tigard. The property is designated Low-Density
Residential on the Tigard Comprehensive Pfan Map. A land-use application adJusting lot lines to
decrease tax lot 901 from 52,757 square feet to 17,859 square feet was approved in December of 1999.
A minor land partition application was also applied for and approved in 1999. However, the approvals
expired. No other land use applications were found to be on file in the City's records.
Site Information and Pro osal Descri tions
e su �ect propert� is approximate y ,986 square feet. The site has approximately 15 feet of
fronta e on SW 90 Avenue. The owner is pro osing a two-parcel artition as indicated on the
propoged partition plat. Parcel #1 (7,764 square feet�and Parcel #2 (8,222 square feet).
SECTION IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments were received.
SECTION V. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Land Partitions (18.420):
The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations;
The proposed partition will comply with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations at the
time of proposed development as demonstrated both by the analysis presented within this administrative
decision and by this application and review process through compliance with the conditions of approval.
Therefore, this criterion is met.
There are adequate public facilities available to serve the proposal;
Public facilities are discussed in detail later in this decision under Chapter 18.810 (Street & Utility
Improvement Standards). Based on the analysis provided herein, Staff finds that adequate public
facilities are available to serve the proposal. Therefore, this criterion is met.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00011/PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION PAGE 4 OF 17
All proposed improvements meet City and applicable agency standards;
The public facilities and proposed improvements are discussed and conditioned later in this decision
under Chapter 18.810 (Street & Utility Improvement Standards). Improvements will be reviewed as pa�t
of the permit process and during construction, at which time the appropriate review authority will ensure
that City and applicable agency standards are met. Based on the analysis in this decision, Staff finds
that this criterion is met.
All proposed lots conform to the specific requirements below:
The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable
zoning district.
The minimum lot width requirement in the R-4.5 zoning district.is 50 feet. The proposed partition creates
two lots that are an average of 80 feet wide. Therefore, this criterion is satisfied.
The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot, the
accessway may not be included in the lot area.
The minimum lot area requirement in the R-4.5 zoning district is 7,500 square feet. The proposed lots
are 7,764 and 8,222 square feet. The lots are flag lots and do not include the accessway as part of the
total square footage. Therefore, this criterion has 6een satisfied.
Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet
or have a legally recorded minimum 15 foot wide access easement.
The proposed partition shows both lots havin 15 feet of access onto SW 90th Avenue throu�h a private
drive. However, the applicant has indicated�hat the parcels will share an additional 15-foo access to
the south through cross-over easements. Therefore, fhe proposed parcels will have 30 feet of frontage
onto SW 90th Avenue. This standard has been met.
Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district.
No development is proposed in conjunction with this application. Setback requirements will be applied at
time of development. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied.
When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard,
provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to
maximize separation from existing structures.
No development is associated with this application. Therefore, this standard can be deferred until the
time of development.
A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an
accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.745.040.
Screening may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable
outdoor recreation areas for proposed development.
The proposed access drive is within ten (10) feet of the adjoining property to the north (tax lot 906).
Therefore, the applicant is required to screen the proposed access drive from the adjoining property to
the north (tax lot 906).
The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway
would have a detrimental effect on fire-fighting capabilities.
The Fire District has no conflicts with the partition as proposed. This criterion will apply only when
structures are developed on the vacant parcels.
Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one lot, a reciprocal easement
which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition
map.
NOTICE OF DECIS�ON MLP2003-00011/PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION PAGE 5 OF 17
The access drive associated with this application serves both of the proposed lots. Therefore, the
applicant is required to record access and maintenance agreements for the proposed parcels and
submit a signed copy to the City.
Any access way shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.705, Access, Egress and
Circulation.
This standard is addressed in greater detail under Chapter 18.705(Access Egress and Circulation)
below.
Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the one-hundred year
floodplain, the city shall reguire consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for
greenway adjoining and wi�hin the floodplain., This area shall include portions at a suitable
elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance
with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan.
The subJ'ect site is not located within or adjacent to the 100-year floodplain. Therefore, this standard
does nof apply.
An application for a variance to the standards prescribed in this chapter shall be made in
accordance with Cha ter 18.370 Variances and Adjustments. The applications for the partition
and variance(s)/adjus�ment(s) wi�l be processed concurrently.
No variances or adjustments are associated with this application.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff can not confirm that the Land Partition standards have
been satisfied, however, if the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the
standards will be met:
CONDITIONS:
. Submit a plan showin proper screening of the access drive from tax lot 906
according to Section 1�.745.040 of the Tigard Development Code.
. Record access and maintenance agreements for the proposed parcels and submit a
signed copy to the City.
Residential Zonin Districts 18.510:
eve opment stan ar s in resi ential zoning districts are contained in Table 18.510.2 below:
TABLE 18.510.2
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES
STANDARD R�.5
Minimum Lot Size
-Detached unit 7,500 sq.ft.
-Duplexes 10,000 sq.ft.
-Attached unit 1
Average Minimum Lot Width
-Detached unit lots 50 ft.
-Duplex lots 90 ft.
-Attached unit lots
Maximum Lot Covera e -
Minimum Setbacks
-Front yard 20 ft.
-Side facing street on
corner&through lots 15 ft.
-Side yard 5 ft.
-Rear yard 15 ft.
-Side or rear yard abutting more
restrictive zoning district
-Distance between property line
and front of ara e 20 ft.
Maximum Hei ht 30 ft.
Minimum Landsca e Re uirement -
[1]Single-family attached residential units permitted at one dwelling per lot with no more that five attached unifs in one grouping.
[2]Lot coverage inGudes all buildings and impervious surfaces.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00011/PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION PAGE 6 OF 17
The above standards are deferred until time of development.
Access Eqress and Circulation (18.705):
o�n#inuing oGfi�atio� property owner. The provisions and maintenance of access and egress
stipulated in this title are continuing requirements or the use of any structure or parcel of real
property in the City.
Access Plan requirements. No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are
presented an approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and
circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director
shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement.
The applicant has indicated that access will be shared with the two newly created parcels of MLP2003-
00012 (Fineview Farm LLC Partition). Therefore, four parcels will be using the same access through
cross-over and access easements. The access is proposed to be 30 feef with 20 feet of pavement,
which connects to SW 90th Avenue. This standard has been satisfied.
Joint Access. Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize
jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses,
structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title,
provided: Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases
or contracts to establish the joint use; and copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts
are placed on permanent file with the City.
The pro osed parcels will share access. The applicant has been conditioned earlier under Chapter
18.420 �Land Partitions) to provide.documentation that establishes access and maintenance rights for
the individual parcels. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied.
Public street access. All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and
18.705.0301 shall connect directly with a public or private street approve by the City for public
use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis.
The proposed parcels will have access onto SW 90th Avenue by means of a 30-foot access drive with
20 feet of pavement. The applicant has been conditioned under Chapter 18.420 (Land Partitions) to
show satisfactory evidence that each parcel has the legal right to use the existing access. Therefore,
this standard has been satisfied.
Inadequate or hazardous access. Applications for building permits shall be referred to the
Commission for review when, in the opinion of the Director, fhe access proposed: Would cause
or increase existing hazardous traffic conditions; or would provide inadequate access for
emergency vehicles; or would in any other way cause hazardous conditions to exist which
would constitute a clear and present danger to the public health, safety, and general welfare.
Direct individual access to arterial or collector streets from single-family dwellings and duplex
lots shall be discouraged. Direct access to major collector or arterial streets shall be considered
only if there is no practical alternative way to access the site. In no case shall the design of the
service drive or drives require or facilitate the backward movement or other maneuvering of a
vehicle within a street, other than an alley. Single-family and duplex dwellings are exempt from
this requirement.
The proposed lots will take access from a private drive that connects to SW 90th Avenue which is a local
street. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue did not indicate that the access to the site is in any way
hazardous or constitutes a clear and present danger. Therefore, this standard does not apply.
Access Mana ement (Section 18.705.030.H)
�ion . . . . states t at an access report shall be submitted with all new development
proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking
needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City
and AASHTO.
The applicant has indicated in the narrative that vision clearance areas can be met and that sight
distance to the north is currently unobstructed. The applicanYs engineer shall provide sight distance
certification for the proposed shared access prior to approval of the final plat.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00011/PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION PAGE 7 OF 17
Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that drivewa�s shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence
area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where
queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway
setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be150 feet, measured from the right-
of-way line of the intersectin� street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be
�reater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic
impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less
than 150 feet of street fronfage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the
adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far
from the intersection as possible.
Both Oak and Locust Streets are classified as collector streets. The proposed shared access onto 90�'
Avenue is located approximately 310 feet from Locust Street and 450 feet from Oak Street, thereby
meeting this criterion.
Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a
collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall
be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet.
SW 90�h Avenue is classified as a local street; therefore this standard does not apply to the proposed
driveway.
Access drives in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the
turning around of fire apparatus by one of the following: a) A circular, aved surface having a
minimum turn radius measured from center point to outside edge of 35 �eet; b) A hammerhead-
configured, paved surface with each leg of the hammerhead having a minimum depth of 40 feet
and a minimum width of 20 feet; c) The maximum cross slope of a required turnaround is 5%.
The access drive is approximately 135 feet in length. Therefore, no fire apparatus turn-around is
necessary.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds the Access, Egress and Circulation Standards
have been met.
Densitv Computations (18.715):
Definition of net develo ment area. Net development area, in acres, shall be determined by
su rac ing e o owing an area s) from the gross acres, which is all of the land included in
the legal description of the property to be developed:
1. All sensitive land areas:
a. Land within the 100-year floodplain;
b. Land or slopes exceeding 25%;
c. Drainage ways; and
d. Wetlands.
2. All land dedicated to the public for park purposes;
3. All land dedicated for public rights-of-way. When actual information is not available, the
followin� formulas may be used:
a. Single-family development: allocate 20% of gross acreage;
b. Multi-family development: allocate 15% of gross acreage.
4. All land proposed for private streets; and
5. A lot of at least the size required by the applicable base zoning district, if an existing
dwelling is to remain on the site.
Calculatin maximum number of residential units. To calculate the maximum number of
resi entia units per ne acre, ivi e t e num er o square feet in the net acres by the minimum
number of square feet required for each lot in the applicable zoning district.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00011/PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION PAGE 8 OF 17
Calculatin minimum number of residential units. As required by Section 18.510.040, the
minimum num er o resi en ia uni s per ne acre shall be calculated by multiplying the
maximum number of units determined in Subsection B above by 80% (0.8).
The standards for density computation deal with the intensity of residential land uses, usually stated
as the number of housing units per acre. The total square footage of the subject property is 17,778
square feet. However, to determine the net developable area, the square footage of the accessway
1,792 s uare feet is subtracted as it is excluded from the lot area er Tigard Development Code
TDC) Section 18.�20.089(g). This results in a net developable area of 15,986 square feet. As the
minimum lot size for the R-4.5 zone is 7,500 square feet, the maximum number of residential units is
two (2). The minimum number of residential units is one (1). The applicant is proposing a two (2) lot
partition. Therefore, the density for the subject property has been met.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Density Computation Standards have been met.
Landscapinq and Screeninq (18.745):
Street trees: Section 18.745.040
ection . 45.040.A.: All development projects fronting on a public street, private street or a
private driveway more than 100 feet in length approved after the adoption of this title shall be
required to plant street trees in accordance with the standards in Section 18.745.040C.
The proposed access is approximately 105 feet in length; according to the standard, driveways in
excess of one hundred (100) feet in length are required to have street trees. Therefore, the applicant is
required to submit a plan showing the proposed access drive with street trees planted in accordance
with Section 18.745.040.C.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Landscaping and Screening Standards have not been
met.
CONDITION: Submit a plan showing the proposed access drive with street trees planted in accordance
with Section 18.745.040.C.
Tree Removal (18.790):
ree p an or fhe�ting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall
be provided for any lot„ parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development
application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development or
conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal wherever possible.
The applicant has not addressed tree removal. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide a tree
plan indicating the size, removal, mitigation and protection of all trees located on the site.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Landscaping and Screening Standards have not been
met.
CONDITION:Provide a tree plan indicating the size, removal, mitigation and protection of all trees
located on the site.
Visual Clearance Areas (18.795):
�is ap er requires t a a c ear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property
adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private
driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or
temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that
obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight
8 feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight
8 feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a
-foot distance points with a straight line.
The applicant's plans show no obstructions within the visual clearance triangles associated with the
partition.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00011/PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION PAGE 9 OF 17
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Staff finds that the Vision Clearance Standards have been ��
met.
IMPACT STUDY (18.390.040): I
l�equires t a t e app icant shall include an impact study. The study shall address, at a
minimum, the transportation system, including bikewa�rs, the drainage system, the parks
system, the water system, the sewer system, and the noise impacts of the development. For
each public facility system and type of impact of the development on the public at large, public
facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community
Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either
specifically concur with the dedication of real property interest, or provide evidence which
supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly
proportional to the projected impacts of the development.
The applicant has submitted an Impact Study that addresses the following systems:
Trans ortation S stem:
ere are Just un er trips per day generated from a sin�le-family detached home. There will be finro
homes built on this property as a result of this partition, which will add almost 20 trips per day onto SW
90th Avenue, a local street and other streets such as SW Locust, a collector street. No new streets will
be created. This amount of traffic on the existing streets would not be considered significant, or degrade
the level of service on the street. There is nothing in the Transportation System Pan indicating a
capacity problem in this area. (The closest recommended improvements are improvements to the
intersection of SW Hall and SW Oak, widening of SW Hall to five lanes, and widening of SW Greenburg
north of SW Locust to five lands). No dedication of right-of-way is necessary, accordmg to the City
Engineer.
Southwest Hall, which is only about 1,300 feet away from this development, is a transit route.
There are no bicycle lanes on SW 90th Avenue, or on any of the nearby streets. No bikeways are
identified on the pedestrian/bikeway plan through this property. The amount of bicycle traffic that will be
generated from the two new homes is not significant.
The new homes will contribute to the funds available for system-wide improvements through payment of
the Transportation Impact Fee (TIF).
Draina e S istem:
e propert�yrains to the east and south, towards the wetland area. Drainage from the shared
driveway wilf be piped to the edge of the wetland through a 12-inch concrete pipe, and then released into
a riprap pad. The site plan will accommodate the upstream drainage adjacent to this development. The
partition will not significantly increase the amount of runoff into the public system. Clean Water Services
has already provided a service letter, accepting the proposed drainage system. The new homes will
contribute to the funds available for system-wide improvements through payment of the water quality fee
(in-lieu-of).
Park S stem:
ere wi e some use of nearby parks, such as Metzger Park. Residents may also use the school
grounds during non-school hours. The new homes will contribute to the funds available for system-wide
park improvements through payment of the System Development Charge (SDC).
Water S stem:
e water system has the capacity to serve this development. There are two �ublic water lines available
in SW 90th Avenue, a 16-inch line and a 6-inch line. There will be no significant impact to the water
system as a result of this two-lot development. The new homes will contribute to the funds available for
system-wide improvements through payment of the Sewer SDC.
Sewer S stem:
e sewer system has the capacity to serve this development. There is an existing sewer main in SW
90th Avenue. There will be no significant impact to the sewer system as a result of this two-lot
development. The new homes will contribute to the funds availabfe for system-wide improvements
through payment of the Sewer SDC.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00011/PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION PAGE 10 OF 17
Noise Im acts:
ere wi e construction-related noise generated during construction of the driveway and utilities, and
then the homes. After construction, there will be no significant noise impact on the neighborhood.
Rough Proportionality:
Any required street improvements to certain collector or higher volume streets and the Washington
County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) are mitigation measures thaf are required at the time of development.
Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan
II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development
on the Collector and Arterial Street system. Presently, the TIF for each trip that is generated is $239.00.
The total TIF for a single-family dwelling is $2,390 per unit.
Upon completion of this development, the future builders of the residences will be required to pay TIF's
of approximately $4,780 ($2,390 x 2 single-family dwelling units. Based on the estimate that total TIF
fees cover 32 percent of the impact on major street improvements cit ide, a fee that would cover 100
percent of this projects traffic impact is $14,937 ($4,780 divided by .32�The difference between the TIF
paid and the full impact, is considered an unmitigated impact. Since the TIF paid is $4,780, the
unmitigated impact can be valued at $10,157. Given that the estimated cost of the dedication is $90.00
($3.00 x 30 square, feet), the requirement to make these improvements falls within the limits of
proportionality to the impact of the development.
PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS
Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810):
ap er . provi es cons ruc ion s an ar s or e implementation of public and private
facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are
addressed below:
Streets:
Improvements:
Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be
improved in accordance with the TDC standards.
Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion
of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC.
Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a local street to have a
54 ri�ht-of-way width and 32-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-
stree parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utifities, street lighting, storm drainage,
and street tr�es.
This site lies adJ'acent to SW 90�' Avenue, which is classified as a local street on the City of Tigard
Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 25 feet of right-of-way, (ROW) from
centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate ROW to
provide 27 feet from centerline.
SW 90�' Avenue is currently paved, but not fully improved to City standards. In order to mitigate the
impact from this development, the applicant should sign a Restrictive Covenant for future street
improvements.
Future Street Plan and Extension of Streets: Section 18.810.030.F states that a future street plan
shall be filed which shows the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the
boundaries of the proposed land division. This section also states that where it is necessary to
give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to
the boundary lines of the tract to be developed and a barricade shall be constructed at the end of
the street. These street stubs to adjoining properties are not considered to be cul-de-sacs since
they are intended to continue as through streets at such time as the adjoining property is
developed. A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the property owners
which shall not be removed until authorized by the City Engineer, the cost of which shall be
included in the street construction cost. Temporary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de-
sac bulbs shall be constructed for stub streets in excess of 150 feet in length.
NOTICE OF DECISION M�P2003-00011/PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION PAGE 11 OF 17
The applicant has indicated that there is not an opportunity for future street connections through this
development due to the wetlands area on the west side of this property. StafF concurs wi�h this
assessment.
Private Streets: Section 18.810.030.T states that design standards for private streets shall be
established by the City Engineer. The City shall require legal assurances for the continued
maintenance of private streets, such as a recorded maintenance agreement. Private streets
serving more than six dwelling units are permitted only within planned developments, mobile
home parks, and multi-family residential developments.
The applicant has indicated that this partition will provide a 10-foot paved shared access within a 15-foot
easement. The applicant has also indicated that the adjacent partition will be providing the same section
on their property. The two combined will provide a 20-foot private street within a 30-foot access
easement be recorded such that all four properties created will have full use of the entire private street.
The applicant shall place a statement on the face of the final plat indicating the private street(s) will be
owned and maintained by the properties that will be served by iUthem. The City's p,ublic improvement
design standards require private streets to have a pavement section equal to a public local street. The
applicant will need to provide this type of pavement section.
Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be
desi�ned with due regard to providing adequate buifding sites for the use contemplated,
consideration of needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and
recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography.
Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall
not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of-way line except:
. Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of
water or, pre-existing development or;
. For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, major collectors or
railroads.
. For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access.
The location of the proposed access drive is precluded from e�ending to SW Maple Court to the east by
a wetland. Therefore this standard does not apply.
Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements
or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is not possible. Spacing between
connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or
topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards
in the code.
As mentioned above, connection of the proposed private street to SW Maple Court to the east is
precluded by an existing wetland. Therefore, this standard does not apply.
Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A} prohibits lot depth from bein� more than 2.5 times
the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the
applicable zoning district.
The average lot width for the proposed parcels is approximately 80 feet. Therefore, the depth of the
proposed lots cannot exceed 200 feet. The applicant's plans show the lots to be no more than 125 feet
deep at the furthest point from the front of the lots. This criterion has been satisfied.
Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that Iots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public
or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies,
which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide
recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit,
the frontage shall be at least 15 feet.
The smallest of the proposed parcels has approximately 35 feet of frontage onto the proposed private
street, which connects to SW 90th Avenue. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00011/PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION PAGE 12 OF 17
Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design
standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private
streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side.
The applicant will be required to sign a Restrictive Covenant for future street improvements, which will
include the construction of sidewalks along the frontage of SW 90th Avenue.
The private street that will serve the four lots (2 lots for this partition and 2 lots for the adjacent partition)
will be required to construct sidewalks on at least one side.
Sanitary Sewers:
Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each
new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the
provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water
Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or
amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan.
Over-siziny: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include
consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive
Plan.
The applicanYs plan indicate that a new, 8-inch public sewer will be constructed from the sewer in gptn
Avenue to the lots. A public easement will be required for a portion of the sewer line. The applicant will
be required to provide a copy of the recorded easement prior to construction.
Storm Drainage:
General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for
storm water and flood water runoff.
Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other
drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream
drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the
necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for
Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and
including any future revisions or amendments).
There is no significant upstream drainage way. Any upstream runoff entering the project access area
will be collected in the proposed catch basin.
Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the
City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an exist�ng
draina�e facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the develo�ment until
provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have
been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the
Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by
Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments).
In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno
Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local
governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no
net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments
resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the
development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the
storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention.
Developments of this small size, especially residential land partitions, are not required to provide on-site
detention. The applicant will be required to pay the water quantity SDC upon application for the building
permits.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00011JPACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION PAGE 13 OF 17
�
The applicant's plans indicate that runoff will be collected and discharged to the existing wetland to the
west. The plans provide for a rip-rap outfall for energy dissipation and erosion control.
Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways:
Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed
bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for
the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way.
SW 90th Avenue is not designated as a bicycle facility.
Utilities:
Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric,
communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed
underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and
meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, tem porary utility service facilities during
construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and:
. The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide
the underground services;
. The City reserves the right to approve location of all surFace mounted facilities;
. All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets
by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surFacing of the streets; and
. Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street
improvements when service connections are made.
Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall
pay a fee in-lieu of under-�rounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a
street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the
apProval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-g rounding the
utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the devefopment. The
determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only: such
situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the
placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An
applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which
are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of
under-grounding.
There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW 90�h Avenue. If the fee in-lieu is
proposed, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The
frontage along this site is 15 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $412.50.
ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT
Public Water S stem:
ua a in a ey a er District provides public water service in this area. The applicant will need to
contact TV Water District for a new water service upon construction of the new homes.
Storm Water Qualit :
e ity as agree to enforce SurFace Water Management (SWM regulations established by
Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards �adopted by Resolution and
Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities
shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm
water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan
shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility
maintained through the year.
The CWS standards include a provision that would exclude small projects such as residential land
partitions. It would be impracticaf to require an on-site water quality facility to accommodate treatment of
the storm water from 2 parcels. Rather, the CWS standards provide that applicants should pay a fee
in-lieu of constructing a facility, if deemed appropriate. Staff recommends payment of the fee in-lieu on
this application.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00011/PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION PAGE 14 OF 17
Address Assi nments:
e i y o igar is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within
the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30.00 per address shall be
assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to final plat approval.
For this project, the addressing fee will be $60.00 (2 lots and/or tracts X $30/address = $60.00).
The develo�er will also be required to provide signage at the entrance of each shared flag lot driveway
or private s reet that lists the addresses that are served by the given driveway or street. This will assist
emergency services personnel to more easily find a particular home.
Sur_v� e_��i Re uirements
The app �can s ina p at shall contain State Plane Coordinates [NAD 83 (91)] on two monuments with a
tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network (GC 22). These monuments
shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat
boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground
measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be
established by:
. GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey.
. By random traverse using conventional surveying methods.
In addition, the applicant's as-built drawings shall be tied to the GPS network. The applicant's,engineer
shall provide the City with an electronic file with points for each structure (manholes, catch basins, water
valves, hydrants and other water system features) in the development, and their respective X and Y
State Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD 83 (91).
SECTION VI. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS
City of Tigard Water Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it.
City of Tigard Long Range Planning Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to
it.
City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it.
City of Tigard Building Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it.
SECTION VII. AGENCY COMMENTS
Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments.
As per the applicants request, the conditions in this approval letter are based on both homes
being protected with automatic fire sprinklers installed in accordance with NFPA 13D.
�� FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD DISTANCE FROM BUILDING AND TURNAROUNDS: Access
roa s s a e wit in eet o a portions o t e exterior wa o t e irst story o t e uilding as
measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building. An approved turnaround is
required if the remainin� distance to an approved intersecting roadway, as measured along the fire
apparatus access road, is greater than 150 feet. (UFC Sec. 902.2.1)
No turnaround will be required for fire apparatus.
NOT�CE OF DECISION MLP2003-00011/PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION PAGE 15 OF 17
� ' i
I
2� FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD WIDTH AND VERTICAL CLEARANCE: Fire apparatus access �
roa s s a ave an uno structe wi t o not ess t an eet eet or one or two dwelling
units and out buildings), and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches.
(UFC Sec. 902.2.2.1) Where fire apparatus roadways are less than 28 feet wide, "NO PARKING"
signs shall be installed on both sides of the roadway and in turnarounds as needed. Where fire
apparatus roadways are more than 28 feet wide but less than 32 feet wide, "NO PARKING" signs
shall be installed on one side of the roadway and in turnarounds as needed. Where fire apparatus
roadways are 32 feet wide or more, parking is not restricted. (UFC Sec. 902.2.4)
3} SURFACE AND L�AD CAPACITIES: Fire apparatus access roads shall be of an all-weather
su ace t at is easi y istinguis a e rom the surrounding area and is capable of supportin� not less
than 12,500 pounds point load (wheel load) and 50,000 pounds live load (gross vehicle weight). You
may need to provide documentation from a registered engineer that the design will be capable of
supporting such loading. Documentation from a registered engineer that the finished construction is
in accordance with the approved plans or the requirements of the Fire Code may be requested.
(Design criteria on back) (UFC Sec. 902.2.2)
a� TURNING RADIUS: The inside turning radius and outside turning radius shall be not less than 25
eet an 4 eet respectively, measured from the same center point. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.3)
s� NO PARKING SIGNS: Where fire apparatus roadways are not of sufficient width to accommodate
par e ve ic es an feet of unobstructed driving surface, "No Parking" signs shall be installed on
one or both sides of the roadway and in turnarounds as needed. (UFC Sec. 902.2.4) Signs shall
read "NO PARKING - FIRE LANE - TOW AWAY ZONE, ORS 98.810 - 98.812" and shall be installed
with a clear space above grade level of 7 feet. Signs shall be 12 inches wide by 18 inches high and
shall have black or red letters and border on a white background. (UFC Sec. 901.4.5.1) — (See
diagram on back)
s� GRADE: Private fire apparatus access roadway grades shall not exceed an average grade of 10
percent with a maximum grade of 15 percent for lengths of no more than 200 feet. Infersections and
turnarounds shall be level (maximum 5%� with the exception of crowning for water run-off. Public
streets shall have a maximum grade of 15/o. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.6)
7� SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES - FIRE HYDRANTS: Fire hydrants for single family
we ings, up exes an su - ivisions, s a e p ace at eac intersection. Intermediate fire
hydrants are required if any portion of a structure exceeds 500 feet from a hydrant at an intersection
as measured in an approved manner around the outside of the structure and along approved fire
apparatus access roadways. Placement of additional fire hydrants shall be as approved by the
Chief. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.2}
s� SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS - REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: The minimum available fire flow for
sing e ami y we ings an up exes s a e , ga ons per minute. If the structure(s) is(are)
3,600 square feet or larger, the required fire flow shall be determined according to UFC Appendix
Table A-lll-A-1. (UFC Appendix III-A, Sec. 5)
s> ACCESS AND FIRE FIGHTING WATER SUPPLY DURING CONSTRUCTION: Approved fire
apparatus access roa wa s an ire ig tin� water supp ies s a e insta e an operational prior to
any other construction on �he site or subdivision. (UFC Sec. 8704)
SECTION VIII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION
Notice: Notice was mailed to:
X The applicant and owners
� Owner of record within the required distance
� Affected government agencies
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00011/PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION PAGE 16 OF 17
Final Decision:
THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON SEPTEMBER 16, 2003 AND BECOMES
EFFECTIVE ON OCTOBER 1, 2003 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED.
A�e�al:
The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are
otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may
appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development
Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director
within ten (10) business days of the date theTlotice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule
and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard,
Oregon 97223.
Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be
confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the
comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may
be submitfed by any party during the appeal hearing, sub�ect to any additional rules of procedure that
may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body.
THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON SEPTEMBER 30, 2003.
Questions:
yoff�e any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW
Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171.
- �� September 16, 2003
PREPA E athew eidegger DATE
Associate Planner
. September 16, 2003
APPROVED BY: Richard H. rsdorff DATE
Planning Manag
i/curpl n/mathew/m Ip/mIp2Q03-00011.dec
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00011/PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION PAGE 17 OF 17
� �, / -- • � ' �
- ---___ GEOGHAPHIC INfOHMHTIUN SYSiEM
nt�N�r�r �
CORAL ST
�
_ _ _ __ _ _ _
� MLP2003-00011
C
PACIFIC CREST
PARTNERS
sT PARTITION
�
�
0
�
� o —
-- � J ..Tr���uS�ER
� '"�
. Jl�i. w FE y.� _7D 14..� `'_
MAPLELEAF ST w "- > � ��'� `�- `�''�
V''
� Q r�°�/ / '{ .'I� 1 9�1�
v� MAPLE �--;.`"�'� �Z, "� � �
Q ; _. ;� �:�� �{�
.�9l,LL�ffT` •.. - . —'-�i �1 ..
:.
i
�_?'.__.;r?9'V.._�r.__Q . eiFOn�ta:��.
v _...._, „ _; �,�
�F��,�� � �'
__----�.. �:..,., � • /
� ,-:: :.. � f�
Tgartl Area Map l
Z
�..� � i
� i-- N I
00 J �
O J
� = 0 100 200 300 Fcet
1'=249 fcel
ST
O
City of Tigard
InlormatlOn on this map is fa general location only and
ahpild Ge venfied vrith Me Devdopment Services Division.
13125 SW Hall BIvA
Tqard,OR 97223
I (503)63&d 171
http://www.ci.tigard.a.us
Community Development Plot date:Aug 8,2003;C:lmagiclMAGIC03.APR
i ��°, i i i r--- - --- ----i
i I i � i i
i
----- '
TL 806
� c/� I �--- ---------- � I
TL 100 � � TL 906 137 �� I �
� I � Parce! i / TL 800 � �
��.� �, �,�ea sq.rr. �tih, � i
I `� ' f �----- ---y
� � , , � ,
, , , , ,
_________ J I � � Parcel 2 � �
as
1APlE STREET � /�et: 8,222 sq.�t. �
N
"= eB t o5' i� Gross: 10,014 sq.ft.
_ `
. 3, ry0
--------- � � TL 1001 �•. 6' �
I �
I � �� .
� � � ,
�r 5�. � .
I I \�
TL 100 � I ` �� �
i �---------- �\ P,l
� � � ,�' �
� � TL 1002 / / �'�O�
I � �� �----
I � / ��G i� �
I �---------- � � �
� I � --Q�.�P'-—�� �
I �
� TL 1101 �P\ i� �
I �
I � 0 �
i i ��� �� �
i o i
i �
i
�
i � �P� �'' �
i r----------�------------ ,.oP �' i
� � TL 1102 I TL 1100 � TL 401 �� I
I � � � , �
� TL 1200 I
� � I I i� �� �
� I I I � i
� l I i� �� �
� �
�mo�p �ITY oF T�6ARD T MLP2003-00011
SITE PLAN N PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION
Map is not to scale
Pacific Crest Partners, Inc.
EXHIBIT �
Attn: Dan Boyden MLP2003-00011
1430 Eastside Road PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION
Hood River, OR 97031
Ed Murphy & Associates
9875 SW Murdock Street
Tigard, OR 97224
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILIHG CITYOFTIGARD
�'ornrnumty�llrveCopme�:t
S(wpingl7 Better�ommunity
I, �Patricia G. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/a�rm, on oath depose and say that I am a SeniorAdministrative SpeciaCut for
the �'ity of 7'rgard`WasFiington County, Oregon and that I served the following:
{Check Appropnate Box(s)Below}
❑X NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: MLP2003-0001 I/PAfIFI[ (REST PARTNERS PARTITION
� AMENDED NOTICE (FileNo./NameReference)
� City of Tigard Planning Director
A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A",and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to
each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhlblt'B",and by reference made a part
hereof, on A11911SI11,2003, and deposited in the United States Mail on A11911St 11,2003,postage prepaid.
�� - ' �
(Pers t r d No � e)
S`.�2E O�'O�G09V' �
Coun�y of�lNasTington )ss.
�'ity of Tigard )
�
Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the ���day of G , 2003.
r (
�,. , OFFICIAL SEAL
�: `:b J BENGTSON
�: ��� �
'"` ' NOTARY PUBUC-OREGON
� COMMISSION NO.368086
MY COMM�SSION eXPIRES APR.27,2007 ^� O
My Commission Expires: ���
� ' ExHrBir�.
NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER:
THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER.
NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION CITYOFTICiARD
MINOR LAND PARTITION Community�Dec�eCopment
SFeapirtgA BetterCommunity
DATE OF NOTICE: August 11, 2003
FILE NUMBER: MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2003-0001 I
FILE NAME: PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION
PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval to perform a two-lot partition on a parcel of land
containing approximately 17,860 square feet. This partition will create Parcel #1 with
approximately 7,764 square feet, and Parcel#2 with approximately 8,222 square feet.
ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to
accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at
a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are
permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally.
APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390,
18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
LOCATION: 10230 SW 90th Avenue; WCTM 1S135AA, Tax Lot 901.
YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS:
Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to
submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT
5:00 PM ON AUGUST 25, 2003. All comments should be directed to Mathew Scheideqger, Associate Planner in
the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the
City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171 or by e-mail to matts(c�ci.tiqard.or.us.
ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED
ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS.
THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS
WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE
IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR SEPTEMBER 9, 2003. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE
SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED.
WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL
CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
. Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria
believed to be applicable to this proposal;
. Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to
provide a response;
. Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant
approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue.
Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude
subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings
directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence.
AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE
DIRECTOR�S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN
500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERW�SE
ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED
UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH
CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REG�UESTED PERMIT OR ACTION.
SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS:
. The application is accepted by the City
. Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a
14-day written comment period.
. The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies.
. City Staff issues a written decision.
. Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all
owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax
assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any
governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the
City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice.
INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW:
The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are
contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development
Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this
service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of
this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments."
�, i I � � ' � ..,....
�
� � -- �,�e....� o.....�.
� , � ma�nr nww I
I � I �— ' -
� CORAL ST _ ________
i ' � ; ' '� MLP2003-0001I
' � � ________
PACIFIC CREST
' _ PARTNERS
sT PARTITION
� � '—
0
I �—���
J
�/ m
��/ � MAPLELEAF T j Q s �
u+
/ Q ' =' ,.; � .
� �t :. .,,. : �
r—
��� _-� - /
,
� �.,u..� �-= -� �
--- , k
N
GD J
� _ �
T �
Ciry o(Tiyrd
aa.�+r�amr.e
r o..m�..r.sn.r.�I
re�ond+�� I
- w-.w�aw.a..
n�l���3-a�i�
1S135A6-00203 1S135AA-04800
ADDERLY DAVID L&SHARON A CAGE JUDITH K EXH I BIT
9120 SW LOCUST ST 10199 SW 87TH
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-05000 1 S 135AA-05400
ALBERTSON RICHARD D CALDWELL TANYA L
10255 SW 8TTH 10269 SW 87TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135AA-01200 1S135AA-04101
ALLISON M DEAN&DOROTHY D CALLAHAN JAY PATRICK
Go ALLISON ANNETTE C 8945 SW OAK ST
8870 SW MAPLELEAF ST TIGARD,OR 97223
PORTLAND,OR 97223
7 S 135AA-05900 1 S 135AA-05100
ANTARES GRACE CASANOVA CARL
8811 SW MAPLE CT 10233 SW 87TH
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-03900 1 S 135AA-03901
BAYARD MICHEL L 8� CHEPIN JOHN
TROWT TOBY ELLEN 8911 SW OAK ST
20555 BOWERY LN TIGARD,OR 97223
BEND,OR 97701
1 S 135AA-03703 1 S 126DD-03500
BRANDT WALDO G CHRISTENSEN ERIC J&
8835 SW OAK ST BARBARA S
TIGARD,OR 97223 8870 SW CORAL
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-00902 1 S 126DD-03002
BROWN JAMES F 8 CRABTREE DENNIS J AND
HENDERSON-BROWN CHERYL L BEVERLY J
10200 5W 90TH AVE 10020 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135AA-00905 1S135AA-06300
B WN JAME F 8 DAGGETT KATHLEEN K
HEN RS -BROWN CHERYL L 1960 MAPLELEAF DR
10200 TH AVE LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034
T RD,OR 7223
1 S 135AA-06400 1 S 135AB-03200
BRYAN SUSAN J DAVIS EUGENE L&VIVIAN
8770 SW MAPLE CT 10875 SW 89TH ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
15135AA-05700 1 135AA-90000
BUTORI EUGENE F TRUST& DE R NDOMINIUMS
BUTORI VIRGINIA A TRUST OW OF UNITS
BY BUTORI EUGENE FNIRGINIA A TRS ,
7645 SW CEDAR
PORTLAND,OR 97225
1S135AB-00204 7S135AA-90002
DICKSON DONALD KEITH HAWLEY HAZEL M
PO BOX 219028 9055 SW 91ST AVE#7
PORTLAND,OR 97225 PORTLAND,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-01000 1 S 35AA-90009
FINEVIEW FARM LLC HA Y EL M
1430 EASTSIDE RD 9055 1ST AVE#7
HOOD RIVER,OR 97031 R TLAND,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-05500 1 S 135AA-03902
FISH LAURI HAZARD SANDRA
10277 SW 87TH AVE 8914 5W OAKWAY
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-90010 1 S 135AA-00802
FLETCHER MARY K HERBERHOLZ LARRY S
10319 SW 87TH AVE 8870 SW LOCUST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 126DD-03000 7 S 135AA-00803
GILE EDWARD S HERBERHOLZ LARRY S&CATHY D
1004�SW 90TH 8870 SW LOCUST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-06900 1 S 135AA-03707
GILHAM ANGELA HITCH DORIS
8840 SW MAPLE CT 1D387 SW 8TTH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 7 26DD-03300 1 S 7 35AA-90008
GOODWIN FRANK O&CHARLENE HOLLAND JEFFREY L&
BY SHELTER MORTGAGE CO DAWN F
9900 SW GREENBURG RD 10315 SW 87TH AVE
PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-05300 1 S 135AA-05800
GRAY BRANDON K& JIA WENYI
GRAY MELISSA 8795 SW MAPLE CT
7871 SW KINGFISHER WAY TIGARD,OR 97223
DURHAM,OR 97224
1 S 126DD-03001 1 S 135AA-06600
HALL GLADYS JOHNSON AARON J
c/o HEINTZ SUSAN I 8810 SW MAPLE CT
10415 SW 72ND TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-00908 1 S 135AA-06000
HARRIS BRYAN J&GENNIE 5 KABALIN KATHY J
10230 SW 90TH AVE 8710 SW MAPLE CT
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AB-03201 1 S126DD-02903
KILGORE KIM&PAUTA MAZZUCA LOUISE C
10445 SW 90TH AVE 10000 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-01002 1 S 126DD-02900
KINDRICK CHARLES C AND M CA ISE C
DEBRA A 10000 TH AVE
10320 SW 90TH R TLAND, 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-9D004 1 S 126DC-05400
KLUDAS JEAN C METZGER UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
10307 SW 87TH AVE 9055 SW LOCUST
TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-017 01 1 S 135AA-06500
KUHN EUGENE P PAMELA L MILLER PAIGE
10340 SW 90TH 8800 SW MAPLE CT
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-00804 1 S 135AA-00806
LAI KHOAN VAN& MILLS MICHAEL E AND
LE THU THI BEVERLY A
10161 SW JEFFERSON AVE 10211 SW JEFFERSON
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-90005 1 S 135AA-00800
LAIRD SHAWN W&LOUISE M NASH GORDON O AND PENNY J
10309 SW 87TH AVENUE 10231 SW JEFFERSON
PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224
1 S 135AA-03800 1 S 135AA-90007
LASHAWAY JULIE A NICKOLICH NAOMI R
Go FINCK DALE M&IDA LIFE ESTATE 10313 SW 87TH AVE
8875 SW OAK TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 7 35AA-06800 1 S 135AA-00700
LEVITSKY STAN A 8 OCF JOSEPH E WESTON
LEVITSKY ALEXANDRIA PUBLIC FOUNDATION
8830 SW MAPLE CT BY WESTON INVESTMENT CO LLC
TIGARD,OR 97223 2154 NE BROADWAY STE 200
PORTLAND,OR 97232
7 S135AA-01102 1 S126DD-03400
MACLAREN ROBERT P 8 OREGON STATE OF DEPT OF VETS AF
JABLONSKI MILLIE Go WALLOCH R B 8 JEANETTE C-03249
10360 SW 90TH AVE 8890 5W CORAL
TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223
�si a��-oseoo �s��a4-0oso�
MATHEWS SEAN PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS INC
8753 SW MAPLE CT 143Q EASTSIDE RD
TIGARD,OR 97223 HOOD RIVER,OR 97031
1 S 135AA-07 7 00 1 S 135AA-90003
PATERSON BR�AN S&SAMI B SHERWOOD SYDNEY L
10370 SW 90TH AVE 10305 SW 8TTH
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-06100 1 S 135AA-00903
PAZEOTOPOULOS LIZA M SICKLER LEE J
8720 SW MAPLE CT 10024 SW 55TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97219
1 S 135AB-00202 1 S 135AA-04000
PENSE JAMES M AND ROXANNE M SMITH ROGER W
9140 SW LOCUST JACQUELYN M
TIGARD,OR 97223 8935 SW OAK 5T
TlGARD,OR 97223
t S 126D D-03800 1 S 135AB-03205
PILGER DENNIS F&ZOE A STANTON KAREN
17703 SW TREETOP WAY 10435 SW 90TH AVE
LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-03705 1 S 135AA-04200
ROMERO MERCEDES G AND SUMMIT DORSEY WAYNE
MOLINA MARTHA A PO BOX 23a998
10385 SW 87TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97281
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-00401 15135AA-90006
ROWE SHIRLEY I TAYLOR J EDWARD AND
WOOD JUDY NEWSOME-TAYLOR PHYLLIS M
1027 SW GROVER PO BOX 230152
PORTLAND,OR 97201 TIGARD,OR 97281
1S135AA-06700 1 S 135AA-0070
SANTEE JOHN R& TIG OF
JUDY A 131 S ALL
8820 SW MAPLE CT GARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 7 26DC-05504 1 S'I 26DG-05503
SCHARBROUGH DONALD AND VANDERYACHT MARK S&
JOYCE I MARY E
10050 SW 92ND 9125 SW LOCUST ST
PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-04900 1 S 135AA-00805
SCOTT WALTER STEVE&TRACY VO VIEN T&
10211 SW 87TH AVE NGUYEN CAM VAN
TIGARD,OR 97223 10181 SW JEFFERSON ST
TIGARD,OR 97223
t S 135A6-03203 7 S 135AB-00100
SHELDON MELINDA L 8 WASHINGTON CLACKAMAS CO
DUANE C SCHOOL DIST 23J
10425 SW 90TH AVE 13137 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135AA-00400 1S135AA-04600
WEGELE MICHAEL YATES RONALD W
8705 SW LOCUST ST 10155 SW 87TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135AA-00900 15135AA-05200
WEINEL BRETT M ZIMMERMAN DIANA L
8950 SW LOCUST ST 1�247 SW 87TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223
1S126DD-03100 PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS. INC.
WESTON IM/ESTMENT CO ATTN: DAN BOYDEN
2154 NE BROADWAY 1430 EASTSIDE ROAD
PORTLAND,OR 97232 HOOD RIVER, QR 97031
1 S 135AA-00904
WILLIAMS LIVING TRUST ED MURPHY & ASSOC I ATES
BY DONNEL N WILLIAMS& 9875 SW MuRDOCK STREET
STEPHANIE S WILLIAMS TRS T I GARD, OR 97224
13865 SW FERN
TIGARD,OR 97223
15135AA-06200
WINBERG HELEN D
8730 SW MAPLE CT
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 7 35AA-07000
WINDWOOD CONSTRUCTION INC
12655 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-07200
W 00 NSTRUCTION INC
12655 ORTH DAKOTA ST
TI ARD,OR 223
1S135AA-07100
Wf OOD STRUCTION INC
12655 ORTH DAKOTA ST
T RD,OR 23
1S135AA-04700
WIN 00 ONSTRUCTION INC
12655 ORTH DAKOTA 5T
� RD,OR 23
1 S135AA-07007
WOLF MARTIN J&GINA K
2550 SW OAKWOOD CT
ALOHA,OR 97006
Jack Biethan Josh Thomas
11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 10395 SW Bonanza
Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224
Kristen Miller
8940 SW Edgewood Street
Tigard, OR 97223
Paul Owen
10335 SW Highland Drive
Tigard, OR 97224
Louise Fronville
15760 SW Oak Meadow Lane
Tigard, OR 97224
Tim Esau
PO Box 230695
Tigard, OR 97281
Nathan and Ann Murdock
PO Box 231265
Tigard, OR 97281
Ross Sundberg
16382 SW 104th Avenue
Tigard, OR 97224
Brian Wegener
9830 SW Kimberly Drive
Tigard, OR 97224
J. Dyar
10430 SW Century Oak Drive
Tigard, OR 97224
Rex Caffall
13205 SW Village Glenn
Tigard, OR 97223
CITY OF TIGARD -SOUtH (IT SUB(OMMITfEE (pg. I of I) (i:lcurpin\setup\IabeIslCIT South.doc) UPDATED: November 27, 2002
. .
GEOGR�PMIL INFORMNT�ON SYSiEM
CORAL ST
AREA NOTIFIED
(500')
�
.� __________
.n.� ,�,.a,,, .�..�.,
�
FOR: Ed Murphy
.�.,
RE: 1 S 13 5AA, 901
ST =_________
�
".�.� '�"°., �
� s� Ru� � Property owner information
tA�� `� (n s�� is valid for 3 months from
� the date printed on this map.
.ow.», .oww,w
� � sAwww
susww�w
svour�r sn��
soir� svswstM
unsra� w
� MAPLELEAF ST ? � Q
� .,�.�
� Q �
� � � �
� .�'"
�
�
.�.m.
� � .
= N
�� �� ti
.,,�,.� �
sa�� 0 100 200 300 Faet
�O �p�� 1"=214 feel
sqs�nar s��
susuu�r
ao�una
suswwrt ���
ST City of"I'igard
` OAInformetion on this map is for general location only and
� ahould be veMed with the Development Services Division.
13125 SW Hall 81vd
I Tperd.OR 97223
(503)fi39-4171
http:llwww.d.tipa rd.or.u a
Community Development Plot date: May 27,2003;C:lmagicUAAGIC03.APR
1S135A8-00203 1S135AA-04800
ADDERLY DAVID L&SHARON A CAGE JUDITH K
9120 SW LOCUST ST 10199 SW 87TH
TIGARO,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-05000 1 S 135AA-05400
ALBERTSON RICHARD D CALDWELL TANYA L
10255 SW 87TH 10269 SW 87TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135AA-01200 1S135AA-04101
ALLISON M DEAN&DOROTHY D CALLAHAN JAY PATRICK
cJo ALLISON ANNETTE C 8945 SW OAK ST
8870 SW MAPLELEAF ST TIGARD,OR 97223
PORTLAND,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-05900 1 S 135AA-05100
ANTARES GRACE CASANOVA CARL
8811 SW MAPLE CT 10233 SW 87TH
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
15135AA-03900 1 S 135AA-03901
BAYARD MICHEL L& CHEPIN JOHN
TROWT TOBY ELLEN 8911 SW OAK ST
20555 BOWERY LN TIGARD,OR 97223
BEND,OR 97701
1 S135AA-03703 1 S126DD-03500
BRANDT WALDO G CHRISTENSEN ERIC J&
8835 SW OAK ST BARBARA S
TIGARD,OR 97223 8870 SW CORAL
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135AA-00902 1S126DD-03002
BROWN JAMES F& CRABTREE DENNIS J AND
HENDERSON-BROWN CHERYL L BEVERLY J
10200 SW 90TH AVE 10020 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-00905 1 S 135AA-06300
B WN JAME F& DAGGETT KATHLEEN K
HEN RS -BROWN CHERYL L 1960 MAPLELEAF DR
10200 OTH AVE LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034
T RD,OR 7223
1 S 135AA-06400 1 S 135AB-03200
BRYAN SUSAN J DAVIS EUGENE L&VIVIAN
8770 SW MAPLE CT 10875 SW 89TH ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-05700 1 135AA-90000
BUTORI EUGENE F TRUST 8� DE R NDOMINIUMS
BUTORI VIRGINIA A TRUST OW OF UNITS
BY BUTORI EUGENE FNIRGINIA A TRS , ,
7645 SW CEDAR
PORTLAND,OR 97225
1 S 135AB-00204 1 S 135AA-90002
DICKSON DONALD KEITH HAWLEY HAZEL M
PO BOX 219028 9055 SW 91 ST AVE#7
PORTLAND,OR 97225 PORTLAND,OR 97223
1S135AA-0'I000 1S 35AA-90009
FINEVIEW FARM LLC HA Y EL M
1430 EAST5IDE RD 9055 1ST AVE#7
HOOD RIVER,OR 97031 P TLAND,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-05500 1 S 135AA-03902
FISH LAURI HAZARD SANDRA
10277 SW 87TH AVE 8914 SW OAKWAY
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
15135AA-90010 1 S 135AA-00802
FLETCHER MARY K HERBERHOLZ LARRY S
10319 SW 87TH AVE 8870 SW LOCUST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 126D D-03000 1 S 135AA-00803
GILE EDWARD S HERBERHOLZ LARRY S&CATHY D
10040 5W 90TH 8870 SW LOCUST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
�s�ssa,a,-ossoo 1 S 135AA-03707
GILHAM ANGELA HITCH DORIS
8840 SW MAPLE CT 10387 SW 87TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 126DD-03300 1 S 135AA-90008
GOODWIN FRANK O&CHARLENE HOLLAND JEFFREY L&
BY SHELTER MORTGAGE CO DAWN F
9900 SW GREENBURG RD 10315 SW 87TH AVE
PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-05300 15135AA-05800
GRAY BRANDON K& JIA WENYI
GRAY MELISSA 8795 SW MAPLE CT
7871 SW KINGFISHER WAY TIGARD,OR 97223
DURHAM,OR 97224
1 S126DD-03001 1 S135AA-06600
HALL GLADYS JOHNSON AARON J
Go HEINTZ SUSAN I 8810 SW MAPLE CT
10415 5W 72ND TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-00906 1 S 135AA-06000
HARRIS BRYAN J&GENNIE S KABALIN KATHY J
10230 SW 90TH AVE 8710 SW MAPLE CT
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135A8-03207 1S126DD-02903
KILGORE KIM&PAULA MAZZUCA LOUISE C
10445 SW 90TH AVE 10000 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-01002 1 S 126DD-02900
KINDRICK CHARLES C AND M CA ISE C
DEBRA A 10000 TH AVE
10320 SW 90TH R9 TLAND, 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-90004 1 S 126DC-05400
KLUDAS JEAN C METZGER UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
10307 SW 87TH AVE 9055 SW LOCUST
TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-01101 1 S 135AA-06500
KUHN EUGENE P PAMELA L MILLER PAIGE
10340 SW 90TH 8800 SW MAPLE CT
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
7S135AA-00804 1S135AA-00806
LAI KHOAN VAN& MILLS MICHAEL E AND
LE THU THI BEVERLY A
10161 SW JEFFERSON AVE 10211 SW JEFFERSON
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135AA-90005 1S135AA-00800
LAIRD SHAWN W&LOUISE M NASH GORDON O AND PENNY J
10309 SW 87TH AVENUE 10231 SW JEFFERSON
PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224
1 S 135AA-03800 1 S 135AA-90007
LASHAWAY JULIE A NICKOLICH NAOMI R
Go FINCK DALE M&IDA LIFE ESTATE 10313 5W 87TH AVE
8875 SW OAK TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-068�0 1 S 135AA-00700
LEVITSKY STAN A& OCF JOSEPH E WESTON
LEVITSKY ALEXANDRIA PUBLIC FOUNDATION
8830 SW MAPLE CT BY WESTON INVESTMENT CO LLC
TIGARD,OR 97223 2154 NE BROADWAY STE 200
PORTLAND,OR 97232
1 S 135AA-01102 1 S 126DD-03400
MACLAREN ROBERT P& OREGON STATE OF DEPT OF VETS AF
JABLONSKI MILLIE Go WALLOCH R B&JEANETTE C-03249
10360 SW 90TH AVE 8890 SW CORAL
TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-05600 1 S 135AA-00801
MATHEWS SEAN PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS INC
8753 SW MAPLE CT 1430 EASTSIDE RD
TIGARD,OR 97223 HOOD RIVER,OR 97031
1 S 135AA-01100 1 S 135AA-90003
PATERSON BRIAN S&SAMI B SHERWOOD SYDNEY L
10370 SW 90TH AVE 10305 SW 87TH
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
7S135AA-06100 1S135AA-00903
PAZEOTOPOULOS LIZA M SICKLER LEE J
8720 SW MAPLE CT 10024 SW 55TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97219
1S135A8-00202 1S135AA-04000
PENSE JAMES M AND ROXANNE M SMITH ROGER W
9140 SW LOCUST JACQUELYN M
TIGARD,OR 97223 8935 SW OAK ST
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 126DD-03800 1 S 135AB-03205
PILGER DENNIS F 8 ZOE A STANTON KAREN
17703 SW TREETOP WAY 10435 SW 90TH AVE
LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-03705 1 S 135AA-04200
ROMERO MERCEDES G AND SUMMIT DORSEY WAYNE
MOLINA MARTHA A PO BOX 230998
10385 SW 87TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97281
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-00401 1 S 135AA-90006
ROWE SHIRLEY I TAYLOR J EDWARD AND
WOOD JUDY NEWSOME-TAYLOR PHYLLIS M
1027 SW GROVER PO BOX 230152
PORTLAND,OR 97201 TIGARD,OR 97281
1 S135AA-06700 1 135AA-0070
SANTEE JOHN R& TIG OF
JUDY A 131 S ALL
8820 SW MAPLE CT GARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
7 S 126D C-05504 1 S 7 26DC-05503
SCHARBROUGH DONALD AND VANDERYACHT MARK S&
JOYCE I MARY E
10050 SW 92ND 9125 SW LOCUST ST
PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD.OR 97223
1S135AA-04900 1S135AA-00805
SCOTT WALTER STEVE 8 TRACY VO VIEN T&
10211 SW 87TH AVE NGUYEN CAM VAN
TIGARD,OR 97223 10181 SW JEFFERSON ST
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AB-03203 1 S 135AB-00100
SHELDON MELINDA L& WASHINGTON CLACKAMAS CO
DUANE C SCHOOL DIST 23J
10425 SW 90TH AVE 13137 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135AA-00400 1S135AA-04600
WEGELE MICHAEL YATES RONALD W
8705 SW LOCUST ST 10155 SW 87TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-00900 1 S 135AA-05200
WEINEL BRETT M ZIMMERMAN DIANA L
8950 SW LOCUST 5T 10247 SW 87TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223
1 S 7 26DD-03100
WESTON INVESTMENT CO
2154 NE BROADWAY
PORTLAND,OR 97232
1 S 135AA-00904
WILLIAMS LIVING TRUST
BY DONNEL N WILLIAMS&
STEPHANIE S WILLIAMS TRS
13865 SW FERN
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-06200
WINBERG HELEN D
8730 SW MAPLE CT
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135AA-07000
WINDWOOD CONSTRUCTION INC
12655 SW NORTH DAKOTA 5T
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-07200
W 00 NSTRUCTION INC
12655 ORTH DAKOTA ST
TI ARD,OR 223
1 S 135AA-07100
WI OOD STRUCTION INC
12655 ORTH DAKOTA ST
T. RD,OR 23
1 S 135AA-04700
WIN 00 ONSTRUCTION INC
12655 ORTH DAKOTA ST
� RD,OR 23
1 S135AA-01001
WOLF MARTIN J&GINA K
2550 SW OAKWOOD CT
ALOHA,OR 97006
. . I
Jack Biethan Josh Thomas
11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 10395 SW Bonanza
Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224
Kristen Miller
8940 SW Edgewood Street
Tigard, OR 97223
Paul Owen
10335 SW Highland Drive
Tigard, OR 97224
Louise Fronville
15760 SW Oak Meadow Lane
Tigard, OR 97224
Tim Esau
PO Box 230695
Tigard, OR 97281
Nathan and Ann Murdock
PO Box 231265
Tigard, OR 97281
Ross Sundberg
16382 SW 104th Avenue
Tigard, OR 97224
Brian Wegener
9830 SW Kimberly Drive
Tigard, OR 97224
J. Dyar
10430 SW Century Oak Drive
Tigard, OR 97224
Rex Caffall
13205 SW Village Glenn
Tigard, OR 97223
CITY OF TIGARD -SOUTH CIT iUBCOMMITfEE (pg. I of I) (i:lcurpin\setup\IabeIslCIT South.doc) UPDATED: November 27, 2002
May 22 03 02: OSp Murohy 50�9681674 p. 2
� � � •
CITY 4F T1GAftD
COMMUNI?Y DEYELOPMENT DEPAATMENT
PLANN}NG BIVlSI01�
13125 SW HALL BOULEYARD cmroFr+��Ao
TIGAIID, QREGON 9I223 , L;otnmunity�evelvpmcr�t
PHONE: 503-634-At71 FAf(� 503-684-1297 (Attn: Patt�/Plaaning) Sl+apdng,B�ctterCosrmunity
° � 0 ° dQ 00 ° ° Q °�j 0 ° ��� �
Property owner information is valid for 3 months from fhe date of your request
lNDfER�E At�. PROJE�T Mf�P & TA� L0�'NUM8ER5 �,�, tSt34A8,Tax�otoo�oo)�R T-HE
ADDRESS€S �QR ALL P�Qd�CT PARC€LS B�LQIN:
c M S135A�1 axL vo a 1 �c�rrec�� ��
oc a o� ✓ oH Go'ca
INDICATE WHETHER YQU ARE REQUE�TING 't, 2 OR 3 SETS QF LASEt�: �
(NOTE: ��i�it�um o�Z seE�of Eabel�wiU�be prouided(u�►kss only.holdi�►g a neigk�borhood meetiFlg-a�this time)ta place on
your 2 seis of envelopes that applicants are required ta submit at the time of application submittal. If a neighborhood
meeting is required and�yau trave not yethefctthat�meeting,you can request 3 setspruvided-your larrd use application will be
submittecf and deemed complete tiy the Planning Qivision within 3 rnonths from this request.
NA �i�-� ' ���-' ?fo��
ME !F �QNTAGT PERSON: � _ �HQN� SG3� C4 2K �/�C�
This re4uest ma}c �e maiied, axe or hand deliver�d to t e City of �'igard. ase a!ow a
2-day m�nimum inr pracessing reques�s. Upon compietion ofi your request, the contact�person will be
c a l l e d to pic k up t he�r reques t tha t wf l l be p laced in "Wifl Cal�' by their last name, at t f ie Community
Development Recep#io� Desk.
The eost of proeessiflg your reque�t must b� paid at- tk�e �ir�e of pick up; as exact eost ean �ot be
pre-determined.
PLEASE NOTE: FOR REASONS OF ACCURACYI ONLY ORIGINAL MAILING LABELS PR4VIDED
BX�ME ElTX VS� RE TXP�D MAI�IN� LAS��.S-1�lLL B�ACCE�'�ED_
cosr o�E,;a�,:
$1'F to g�#e tl�e maili�g�l�st,P4us$2 per sktee�for prin�ng the list onto labels{20 addtess�s pec sheet�.
Then, mufti the cost to rint one set oF Iabels b lhe number vt sets uested.
EXaMPCE �OST FdR THIS REQUEST
4 sheets 4f labels x$7Jsheet= 8.00 x 2 sets= $16.i)0 �sheet(s)of labels x$2lsheet= G' x .,2- se s= �'
2 sheets of labels x$2/sheet for CIT area x 2 sets=$ 4.Op �sheet{s)of labels x$2lsheei for G!T area=�xW�sets=�
GENERATE LIST =�.1�Q4 rf GENERAiF LIST = �
TOTAL =$31 AO ( �r� TOTAL - ��
�
May 22 03 02: 05p Murchy 5r�9681674 p. 3
. In*ermaa 5/23/03 1 :53 PM
��'���� �����
y "•. '� :. ` r�
R efres h M a p ',',: - -- --------- `-�---_...._ -- - --- -,
,�
.,
��r��'�� � r �'; I
i= I
�r� «+�� fi L`�• _—_" ___��__L_ �
��1
.'X � �s ' .__"__.,..__�._ ( _ __
,�t,{.�'�'��r,,.�,�di11t 9 � 4
�a �� ; ��- -- - _.
���y� �;: � ;
��- k f ��
�. ��',
���70011�1�ittlz.t '� `� I
� ; �� .
. �,� ,it?!3'i�"�3C,UfiC��i•4� ----_ � �
_ •
�2 �,�i- .
i •
F �� t ,� .s i .
.
�, .'� ti � ' i;� •
L 't �'{ -� ��.1':,""I •
.nRt`$r' r . :.. ::` ', •
` +�J I Ik�t7 F��� �� ; I � �
t� � - �1 • �
�t't �
. ...,,,,� ,:, • ��
VOIEf}�<<f li t , . , +
�[] Citi�en part Ore 1►S 13��4Q9Q 1
'� Cs�f,ours f20 f't) Map Width:-'116f.5 feet county View
h1[p://www.co.wis�inyton.or.us/scrlpt�/e5rim�p.dll7n�me-IMSlnterne�6Cmtl�identlfy6Button-R�Fr�sn+Mapolyt�xlots-Trul'3a��dis�7r�
May 22 03 02: 05p Murohy Sn�9681674 p. l
� � � ` .
FAX TRANSMITTAL MEMO
To: City of Tigard, Planning
ATTN: Patty
FAx#: 503-684-7297
DATE: 5/23/03, 3:05 PM �
�: Mailing Labels,Fineview cj ����,/
C
MESSAGE: Hi Patty. Okay, I see now that the tax lot nurnbers have �`�
changed or something since the staff report was done in mid-2000. Th���
correct tax lot numbers are iS135AA00901 and iS135AA03000. �We need
to have 2 sets of mailing IabeEs for each tax lot, rather than combined, as
there will be two sepa�ate partition applications.
Sorry for the bother. I should have double-checked the county maps
first. n
Thanks Patty!
/Phvne 503• 624-4625 �Fax go3.g68.16�q �ejmurphy�aol.com
r
,5
CITY OF TIGARD 4
Community�eveCopment
S(aping A Better Co�n�ru�nity
�
LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION
120 DAYS = 12/3/2003
FILE NO.: MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2003-00011
FILE TITLE: PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS PARTITION
APPLICANT/ Pacific Crest Partners, Inc. APPLICANT'S Ed Murphy & Associates
OWNER: Attn: Dan Boyden REP.: 9875 SW Murdock Street
1430 Eastside Road Tigard, OR 97224
Hood River, OR 97031
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to perform a two-lot partition on a parcel of land
containing approximately 17,860 square feet. This partition will create Parcel #1 with
approximately 7,764 square feet, and Parcel #2 with approximately 8,222 square feet.
LOCATION: 10230 SW 90'h Avenue; WCTM 1S135AA, Tax Lot 901.
ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to
accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential
units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family
units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted
conditionally.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715,
18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
CIT AREA: East
DECISION MAKING BODY BELOW: ❑ TYPE I � TYPE II ❑ TYPE III ❑ TYPE IV
DATE COMMENTS WERE SENT: AUGUST 11, 2003 DATE COMMENTS ARE DUE: AUGUST 25, 2003
❑HEARINGS OFFICER [MONJ DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 1:00 PM
❑PLANNING COMMISSION [MON.] DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM
❑CITY COUNCIL [TUESJ DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM
�STAFF DECISION [TENTATIYE] DATE OF DECISION: SEPTEMBER 9, 2003
COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION
� VICINITY MAP � CONTOUR MAP � TREE PLAN
� SITE PLAN � UTILITY PLAN � IMPACT STUDY
� NARRATIVE � PRELIMINARY PL�,I � OTHER:
STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheideqqer, Associate Planner (503) 639-4171, Ext. 2437
�
,_ , PRE�IPP.HELD BY: �
CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVIStON�
13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD, OR 97223-8189
503.639.4171/503.684.7297
CITY OF TIOARD �
OREGON LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION
File# L �v� .-�;�` �� Other Case#
Date � , v 3 B Recei f# " ��7 ��3 � Date A lication Com lete
TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR
❑AdjustmenWariance(I or II) �Minor Land Partition (II) ❑Subdivision (II or III)
❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment(IV) ❑ Minor Modification (I) ❑Zone Change (III)
❑Conditional Use (III) ❑ Planned Development(III) ❑Zone Change Annexation (IV)
❑ Historic Overlay (II or III) ❑ Sensitive Lands Review(I, II or III) ❑Zone Ordinance Amendment(IV)
❑ Home Occupation (I or II) ❑Site Development Review(II)
❑ Miscellaneous (I)-(Lot Line Adjustment/Temporary Use/Tree Removal/Director's Interpretation, etc.)
ress i avai a e
sf d � � Vf y e 330 ��ef N [�cu f S r
W G Kn I S I 5 A a-� Lo� Q C' �j �`(
O.yl acres ��y ,�,
Poci�� CvPsf a✓fh��s inc . �a a o ,n
1 d � ' Q owd a �VP✓ 0 Ui� `/7G31
Syi - 3� 3�� sy� 8 S
�d jNlu� C� so3- G2�-y�z�
is i more an one
�a�l�z CVfS�" I�i✓lrl�t✓s
� o fasFsrde �pd �ud lZ�'Je.. O,�e� 031
S�ll - 36( ' 63 33 S�f I � 38G- Y375
'When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in
possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owners must sign this application in the
s ace rovided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this a lication.
ease e speci ic
4!�'�i i�M ✓o �f�r o Gr e� o �e G�� i¢'r' QZZZ
� c a�c c I c��'( e ro , a<
w �r e
I
i
1
APPUCATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT ALL OF THE REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS AS
DESCRIBED IN THE "BASIC SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS" INFORMATION SHEET. s�
�
-- - — -- - � ,
r
THE APPLICANT SHALL CERTIFY THAT:
♦ If the appticaiion is granted.the applicant shatl exercise the righis granfed in accordanee with the
terms and subject to afl the conditions and limitations of the a�proval.
� All t�ie above statemenEs and the statemerits i�the p1Qt pFa�, attachments, and exhihi�
fransmitted herewith,are true;and the applicants so acknowleclge ihat any pem►it issued,based
on this appGcation, map be revaked if it is found that an�sucb staiements are false.
� The applicanthas read the entire cDnlents af the applicalion�'tncludi[tg the policies and-criteria,
and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application{s).
StGNATUR�S 4F E�lCF�01NNER OF THE SUBJECT PRUPER'Flf Af2E REQFJ1i�Ef3.
-�ts�sr�..-� '�•2 3 -o�
�
Owner's Signa ���,� �t,�.yY.. �r.�, �..v_Aate
,
Owrter's Stgrtature Date
Ow»er's Sigrtatttre Ratg
Qwner's Signature DaEe
Own�r's Stgnatur� Oate
ApplicantlAgent/Represeatathte's Signalura �ate
ApplicarttlAgentlRepresentative's Sigrratvre Date
cinr oF ri���
August 6, 2oos OREGON
Pacific Crest Parners, Inc.
Attn: Dan Boyden
1430 Eastside Road
Hood River, OR 97031
Dear Mr. Boyden:
RE: Notice of Complete Application Submittal fMLP2003-00011)
The City has reviewed your submittal material and finds that your application is
complete as of 08/05/03. Staff will now review your application for Land Partition
Approval and associated applications. A decision will be rendered within 5-6 weeks.
I am available to answer questions and otherwise assist you as may be required at
503-639-4171, extension 2437. Office hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday
through Friday. If I am not available, please leave your name and phone number so
that I can call you as soon as possible.
Sincerely,
��
��u
-__--"
Mathew Scheidegg r
Associate Planner
i:\curpinlmathewUnlp2003-00011.acc.acc
c: MLP2003-00011 Land Use File
Ed Murphy & Associates ,
9875 SW Murdock Street
Tigard, OR 97224
13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD(503)684-2772
June 30, 2003
CITY OF TIGARD
Pacific Crest Parners, Inc.
OREGON
Attn: Dan Boyden
1430 Eastside Road
Hood River, OR 97031
Dear Mr. Boyden:
RE: Notice of Incomplete A�plication Submittal MLP2003-00011
The City has not received the information necessary to begin the review of your Minor
Land Partition application. Staff has, therefore, deemed your application submittal as
incomplete. In order for staff to proceed, the following materials will need to be
submitted:
. Submit 16 additional packets of submittal material.
I will need 16 copies of full size plans and narrative. This partition was reviewed in 1999
(MLP1999-00017). If no information has changed, you may request a copy of the
previously approved plans and narrative in order to make your own copies.
. Submit ownership information (copy of deed or transfer title).
I am available to answer questions and otherwise assist you as may be required at
503-639-4171, extension #2437. Office hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday
through Friday. If I am not available, please leave your name and phone number so
that I can call you as soon as possible.
Sincerely,
c� _ �_�
Mat ew Scheidegger
Assistant Planner
i:\curpl n\mathewUnlp2003-00011.acc
c: MLP2003-00011 Land Use File
Ed Murphy 8� Associates
9875 SW Murdock Street
Tigard, OR 97224
13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772
�._,
�
Jul U;i 03 11 :U4p 1lanie i J. tfoyden 15411 �a�-a:��i5 p. �
I� J �r�.vr. ��� �� ���.���.r� �s� ��■ ■ ■ ■ �� ■����r� Co�� O' I4FAJLOR f ss
� , , 1 I,Jerry R. Hanson,Director ot Assess-
ment and Taxation and Ex-Otrieip Counfy
C� p Clerk for said couni y fy
�� �''� WARRAN7Y DEED This S ac �hewithininstrumento(wnt gwas eceived
and recwded ir� book of reeords o€ said
GRANTOR: JEFFERY EUGEN� KROO county. `�
GRANTEE: PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS, 1NC.
Untit a cttartge is roqnested, att t�nc statcrrtett[s sha�l be Jeay !� Hansnn�Qicectoc of
sent to the followin� address: Assessment and Taxation,E�c-
o Officio Courty Clerk
PACiF1C CRCST �ARTI�IERS, It�1C.
911 OAK ST. r poc : 97058637
I�IOOD RIVER, OR 97031 Rect: 189063 188. 00
06i26/1997 03: 53:09pm �
Escrow No. 659G46JA Title No. W659646
After recording rcturn to:
PAC1F[C CREST PARTNERS, 1NC.
9 t t fJAK ST.
HOOD RiVER. OR 97031
STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED
JEFFCRY EUCENE KR�O Grantor, conveys and warrants to PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS, INC., AN OREGON
�' C01tPORATION. Gra�rtee, tl�e follow•ing described real proQerty free of encumbrances except as specifically set forth herein
situated in V1'ASFitNCi'f'ON County, Oreson, to wit:
v
� SEE '6EG.4L BESCItEPTION' ATCAEHED kiERET� AI�ID BY REFEREI�[CE MADE A PART HEREUE
THIS 1NSTRLIMENT WILL N�T ALLOW llSE OF TH� PRQPERTY DESCRiB6D 1N THIS 1NSTRUMENT 1N VIOLATION
OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AiVD REGULATfONS_ BEFaRE 51GNiiVG OR ACCEP'17NG THIS INSTRUMENT,
'TFIE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE'1'1TLE TO TfiE PROPERTY SHOUI,D CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR
COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMETfT TO VERIFY APPROVbD USES AND'TO DETERMtNE AIVY L]MITS ON
LAWSUITS AGA[NST FARMING OR C'OREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930. The said property is free from
encumbrances except: THE STATUTORY POWERS OF THE UNfi'lED SEWCRAGE AGENCY; EASEMENTS FOR
UTILITIES, IF ANY.
The true coi+.sideratio� for this conveyance Es 5750,000.0l1 (Here comply svith the require�ents cf ORS :3.030)
Dated this��day of �,L� (9�
JE��u E KRO �
�
te of Oreg , CQUntp of � �o -���--
The fore�oin�instrument�vfls ackno�vledged before me this r--i- aay of � , l� bv
JEFFERY ElIC�
i �. � ��
,' %;
tary Publi�oT Qregon � '��'� WASHINGTON COl7NTY
REA� PYPOPER77 T/PANSf£R TA
ion expires: I�-t S'� �`� � J .f �5Q, Q� �p• �'�7
`/ ^�'
OFF1CIAl lEAL FFE PAID QATE
� �96EOk��36�6
Mrr mAD1199�ON0�M1�OL'�1E.9000
������
�
•��.�
- �;�
—„
JUl UJ U.1 11: U`FP Lafllll J. noyaen 1.7Y11 Ji7h-.7J/.7 P. 4
JTIr.Of TITLE IN5��3`�� JR TfTCE INSUR�4���
EXIIIBIT 'A'
�.�cAt,n�sczrn�rorr
The Soutli 7� feec af Lots 7, 8, 9, 10, Block 4, TOWN OF MBTZGGR, in the City of Tigard,.County
of Washing�or3 and State of Oregoir, TOG�THER WETki the �acated portions o�Mad�son St. and
S.W. Mapleleaf St., adjacent thereto and more particularly described as follows:
Begirn�ing aE theSoufHeasf eorf►er c�f�k�ot }0, Bloek 4, TOWN OF ME'F2GER, tr�the CK�of Tigard,
County of Washington and State of Ore�on; thence North along the East line of said Lot 10, 75 feet;
tt��ee Easf KraraEle} witEi t}�e SouUt lirteo€said Lot }4, a disEanee�€25 feet to the eenEer tine of
Madison St., (vacated); then Soutli along the said center line I00 feet to the point of intersection with
the center of Socrtttwest MapFe St. (<<aeatedy tF�ence West alor�saicl eer�Eer 1it�e 225 feet fo the East
line of Soutl�west 90th Ave; d�ence North along said Eas[line, 25 feet to the Southwest corner of Lot
7, Block 4, TOWA} OF MET�GER;thence East 200 fee� a4or�g Ehe SouEh 4ine of Bloek 4, Eo the true
point of besinning.
���
_ - ---_ �:'_E.=_�
�/ui VJ UJ 11 . VTr+ LOIIlCl J. DV�JUCfI t.7711 JOO—JJ/�7 P. l
� • �M�V�/ / l 1 Vv ���JV��A�\\
, _
1�'ARRANTY DL•�D Thi STATE OF pREGON �
County of 1Nashi�gion SS
GRAN"1'OR: JUDY C. 1�VOOD �-
�,�g�'Y R:Rans6n, Dicec�pr of Assess-
ment and�saxation aod Ex-Officio County
GRANTFE: FINEVI��'�' TARVt LLC Clerk brsaid county,do hereby certity that
ihe within instrument oi writing was received
Until a change is requested,all tax statemtnts shall be and recorded in book ot records of said
couniy. �
sent to the fo}loiveng address:
FIiV�VIEW FARM LLC
1430 CASTSI�� ROAD
I-IOOD RIVER, OR 97031 Jerry R. Hanson, Director ot
Assessment ar�d Ta�tion,Ex-
Escroa•No. G9>jGS Title No. G9�56S-7 iV1 Qfficio County Cferk
Aticr rccordinb returu to: DoC : 20t)OOU3719
1-1NEVIEtiy'FARM LLC Rect: 29729� 77,pp
1430 EASTSIDE ROAD 41/29�20U0 10:33:OAam
HOOD RIVE12. OR 97031
tio
I�� � STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED
�1 ILIDY� WQOD Grantnr, coneeys and.�arraxus to r1NEVIFGI�T'ARM, L.E..C.,as OFCgoc�lirnilcd liability sompany Grantec,
the following described real propei�ty fi•ee of encumbranccs except as specifically set forth l�erein situated in N�ASHINGTON
Count�-, Ore�on, co wit
�} SG� 'LEGAL DESCStIPTTON' ATTACHED I�I�RE7'O AND BY REtE1tLI�fCE MADL A PART F�REOF.
�...1
� THIS Il�STRU�+fENT W1LL NOT ALL01ti� U5E OF TIIE PROPERT'Y DESCRiBED IN TI-IiS [NSTRUMENT II� ViOLAT10N
�"' OF�PPLfCEtB�E LAND t1SE f.,hWS A�fl� RI;GULfkTtONS. [ietQttE SI�1VtNG OR fCCCEPTING THTS (NS7TZLJMEVT,
CC THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE 1'1TLE TO TH� PROPERTY SFIOULD CHECK W1TtI THE APPROPR]ATC CITY OR
O COCI��Y PLAI�I]J��',D�PARTM�1\"C TO �'ERIFY AAPROVEII F�SES ANE3"F�E}E"FERtv1RVL- Pt1JY EFMITS ON
V LA�VSU[TS AGAINST FARMING OR FORCST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930. The said property is frce fro�n
}�+ encumbi�nces ezcept:CONDiTiONS, RESTRICTIONS,GASEMENTS��II� PQWERS OF 5PLCIAL OISTRICTS, If Ai�[Y.
m The true cons�deration for this conr•eyance is 350,000_00 (Here comply�vith the requirements of ORS 93.030)
�
� Daled diis �day of �.�" �
� �/ � —
� Y C.
i
J '-'
State of Oregon, County of --f��i✓�'7G?9
The foregoing insirument was ackno��•ledb� before me this duy of % . 20C�� by
JUDY C. WOOD �
�' — � _,
� - �
� . ��"� � —t OFFIGIAL SUL
Pvblie fen Oregorr �; 6ARBRRA iiRSKINS
( `�P,J NOTARY PUBUGOREGpN
l My commission expires:
CnPSd,1tSS10P1 ND.322644
! MY f;�h}��1fS510Pt€Xf'if�ES/�FR.18,2003
v
..--_.
��.
= t=''... ..fi:-'�ON r,'C...iY
. ' k '• �� t- ':-+��.�.:'�e' T.ti;i.i/`�".^ }h.X
,,+,. �♦ `..��0.� ��—�
•,�.+::�T 6'::►: P:IL� OATE
�
�s
x
�;
F 1
. . . _ . .�...,���
..... .... .... . .. ., .r ......_�_ ... ....„,.�,. .., .. , ...,.. ...., .. �. �
�J;te� �iT�E intst���bc�
EI�HIBI'F �A'
LEGAL DESCItIPTION
PARCE�. k: A pareel vf Farrd irr NorEheasf one qu�rter of the Northe�st one-qu�-ter o€SeetioB 3�,
To�vnship 1 South, Range 1 West of the �'Villamette Meridian, in 1he City of Tiaard, County of
�t�ashington and SeaEe of Oregvn, to-wit:
Lots 1, 2, and the North 40 feet of Lot 12, B[ock 19, �OtiV�( OF MET'LLR, together with Lots l, 2
and �, B}oek 2a TQWN 4F MET�GER; together tvitl�t}�at portion of MapEeSE�eeE EasE eoati�ucws
to sa�d Lots 2 and 3, Block 20 �vhich inured to these l�ts as a result of thc vacation in Resolation and
Order recorded in Baok 94} page 686, Washin��torr Caanty Records, together�rit�t that ptMTOn of
Madison Street contiguous to said Lot 1 and the Nortb 40 feet of Lot 12, Block 19 and Lot 3, Block
20�cltiel� iflured t�t�ese kots as a resu}t of the �acaNOt� Fecorded i►t Book 3�1 pag€53�, Vllash'tngton
County Records, together �vith the South one-half of that portion of vacated Maple Street West w�hich
Iies between the�Vester}y riahe vf tvay lir.e of tk�e;�a�dcmec�Orego:t Eleetrie RailFOad and 4}te
Lasterly nght of way line of SW Monroe Street (S��V 90th Avenue).
PARCEL 2: Lt>E 9, B}oek 2}, �'OWN OF ME�'�6�R, in the Etty of�'i�arci, County�aE'Washington
and 5tate of Oregon.
TOfrE�FHER WF�FI� t}rat portion vf vacatec}��� Maple Street �vhick�inufeci there�a bp reasorr o-f
Vacation in Resolulion and Order 72-24�, recorded in Book 94] page 68G, Washington County
Recerds.
AND�OGEFfiEit V1�iTI� that portion of vaeated-SW N}adison Street wErich ir��red thereto by reason
of Yacation recorded in Book 311 page 535, �'Vashington County Deed Records.
Jul U� U� ll :u4p Laniei �. noyaen ia�� , aoo-�� ia p. a
_ STATE G._..�REGOI�f �
County of Washington SS
AFTER RECORDING, RETURN TO' I,Jerry R, Hanson,Director of Assess-
• ment and Taxation and F�c-Offtcio County
Cierk tor esid county,drr he►eby eesfrfy Ehai
the wifh'rn instrument of writing was received
PaCific Crest Partners, Inc. and recorded in book of records of said
CfQ FINEV W F tz� r.i.� °OU^�- ��
143� Eastside Road
Hood River, Of� 9I031
Jerry R. Hanson, birector of
Assessrtienf and Taxatina,Ex-
OHicio County Clerk
Doc : 2000U03721
Rect: 297290 27.00
O1/19/200U 10:33:UAam
1�.' AMENDMENT TO EASE2�NT
A. Peter A. Savage and Ann Savaqe (herein "Savage") are
�a' owners o€ cert�in property a� 10304 SW 90`", Tiga�d, Oregon, mcire
particularly described as the northerly 70 feet of Lots 3 and 4,
'•.�` &lock 19, TQ�I�T OF METZGER, Vlashingtnn Cou�t�, Qregan_ The
southerly 7 '� feet of the property of Savage is subject to an
easement €ar purposes af installation and maintaining a se�e� linP
which was recorded on April 27, 1982 , Document Number 82010466 .
Washingtnn CouAty Records.
�i B. Pursuant to a Settlement Agreement executed among
a' •� Savage, Judy C. Wood, Francis ht. Chapmarr anc� Pacific Cres�
F � Partners, Inc. , Savage agreed upon certain conditions to expand the
'� •~ easement. '£hose condi�ions have been s�tisfied. Finev�ew ���m,
�, s�
:= ;� LLC, will acquire the property to the north and west and is the
}�� suece�sor xn interest to the ea�emer�� rights_
C.1 >,
�� " NO4�, '�HEREFORE, it is hersby agreed t1�at the easernent
•�'� 5�
-: � described above i.s hereby amended so that the area of the easement
.`� w is expanded to the southerly 15 feet of the property owned by
G"� Savaqe, described above. Except as amended herein, the easement
� U re�aifls in €ull force and effect. Savage ackna�sledges =eceipt of
consideration for this amendment to the easement.
Dated: ��/���d_.
' PETER A. SAVAGE
�>;
�•;: ��,:'v� '�i-t2it'y�..��
, `_ AI�I11 SA�IAG�
- ///
` ///
PAGE 1 - AMENDMENT TO EASEMENT -II22g9
, f�
Jul u� u� 11:u�p uaniei �. ao�arn IJTl , ��� ���� �. �
STRTE OF OREGON )
) SS.
COU�TY OF WASHTNGTON )
This instrument was acknowledged before me on this �',.�
day of �, .,: .; . ,._i,,r.i7�j '�Y Peter A. Savage. ,�^�.
% f� - :
� . '�;-�^� .'��
_�; +� ;
l '/i. ♦:�%i�r !;�� �.-- _
NOfi
OFFICIAL SEAL
�,,�j BAABARA HASKINS
STATE �F OREGON ) �'�::�`j N��T.aRVPUti�!C-PREGON
1 ) SS. �' � �n.ti�1R42403
�o��Y OF V V O���I�1T'1"�'�1�1 , ��..,� .:� ..;,_
This instrument was acknowledged on this � day of
, ��"� by Ann S�vac}e.
Q�'�sc-�l.o�
�,,.,,,..__ AIDTARY PUBLIC FQR OREGQN
4FFICIAt S�/1L
C�Y�
,. : rlOTARY PUBLICr�N
CO�SSION Ii0.308936
M1c C06�is�a���=:cwREz FEB 13 2ooR
PAGE 2 — ANtENDNtENg TO EASENfENT . 112299
�
C �iIC ,A. GO -�ITLE
� DEVELOPME �T � SERVICES
10001 S. E. SUNNYSIDE ROAA
C�.ACHAMAS, OREGON 97015
'�RANSMIT7AL SFIEET
'�p; FROM:
Pam Boyd Bill McCorkle,Pro�ect Coordinator
GOMI�AN Y: n ATk=
LDC Design Group �9 July, 2�01
FAX NUMHER: TOTAL NO.OP PAGES[NCLUDIt1G COVER:
645-5500 8
PHONE NUMBER: SENDSR'S R6PRRRNCF.NUMBER:
�t@; YOUR REFERENCE NUMBER:
Morfozd
0 URGENT X FOR REVIEW ❑PLEASE COMMENT ❑PLEASE REPLY ❑ PLSASE RECXGI.�
NOTES/COhtMENTS;
8111
Fax: 503-471-7823 Mobile: 503-789-6961
Email: McCorkleB(a�ctt.com Direct Line: 503-794-5887
"Helprir�g You Build the Futu�e" -
P'HONL 503-794-5887'�FAX 303-47i-7823 •EMAxL MCCORKLEBQCTT�COM
�;
�
--- �
Order No: 230052
DESCRIPTION
(Conti�ued�
GENERAL EXCEPTIONS (Standard Coverage eolicies only)
1. a. Taxes or assessmenta which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any
taxing author�ty that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by Che
public recorda.
b. Proceedinga by a public agency which may result xn Caxee or assessments, or
notices of such proceedzngs, whether or nor shown by the records of �uch agency
or by the public records.
2. a_ Easements, liene, encumbrances, interests or ciaims thereof which are not
ahown by the public records.
b. Any facts, righte, interestis or claims �h�cb are noC shown by the public
records but which could be ascerta�ned by an inapectiion of the land or by
• making inqufry of persons in posseasion thereof.
3. DisCrepancies, conflicts in boundary linea, shortage in area, �ncroachments, or
any other facts which a correct aurvey would disclose, and which are not shown
by the public records.
4, a. Unpatented mining claims;
b. Reservations or exceptivns �n patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance .
thereoF;
c. Water righta, claims or title to Wacer;
wheeher or not the matters excepted under (a) , (b) , o� (c) are shown by the public
records.
5 . Any l�en or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereatLer
furn�ahed, imposed by law and not shown by the public recorde.
'.�
:�.;.�]
-- . _»�
Order No: 230052
SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS
6. Taxes for the fiecal year 2001-2002, a lien but not yet payab�e.
7. The premises herein described are within and subject to the atatutory potiers
�nclud�ng the power of assessment of Clean Water Services.
8. Regulations, including levies, liens, asseaementa, righta of way, and eaaementa
of Tualatin Valley Water District.
9. City liens, if any, of the Cicy of xigaxd.
10_ An easement created by instrument, including terms and provieions Chereof;
Dated: January 14, 2000
Recorded: January 19, 2000
Recorder's Fee No. : 2000003720
In Favor Of: Ad�acent property owners
For: Landscap�ng
Affects: The Southerly 5 feet of �he Wescerly 100 feet ot Parcel
I
il. A copy of the terms and provisions of the Operating Agreement for Fineview Farm,
LLC, an Oregon limited liability company should be furnished for our examination
prior to closing. Any conveyance or encumbrance of the real property owned by
the Limited Liability Company must be executed in accordance �ith the Operating
Agreement or �� the Operating Agreement containa no auch provieions, a majority
of the managers as provided in ORS 63.150. In addition, if there have been any
changes in membership from the date of original creation vf the Limited Liability
Company to the present date, copies of approval vf Withdrawal and aCCeptance of
the new member should be furniahed for our examination.
(AFfecte Parcel T)
NOTE: Taxes for the �iacal year 2000-2001, paid in full.
Original Amount: 51,482.12, including
Speciai Assessment: Metzger Park
Levy Code: 023-91
Account No. : R270904
Map No. : iS135AA
Tax Lot No. : 00901
(Affects a portion of Parcel ii and other propercy also}
NOTE: Taxee for che fiscal year 2000-2001, paid in full.
Original Amount: S461,33, including
Special Assessment: Metzger Park
Levy Ccde: 023-A1
Account No. : R270959
Map No. ; 1S13SAA
Tax Lot No. : 01000
(Affects a portion o� Parcel T and a portion of Parcel II)
(Continued)
- _.�
JUL l � Lbbl 1C � 1� rK LI1L-UtV/GLUK . 5VL5 �b� 4 ! 1 f�C� IV �5b�b45��bb r, bq/b (
� Order No: 230052
SPECIAL EXCEPTYONS (Continued)
� NOTE: Taxes for the fiscal year 2000-20oi, paid in fuii.
Original Amount: $4 .01, including
Special Assessment: Met2gez Park
Levy Code: 023-61
ACCOUriG No. : R1217301
Map No. : iS135AA
Tax Loc No. : 01301
(Affects a portion of Parcel II)
END OF REPOAT
cc: LDC Design Group
Pam Soyd
TS/gs
July 19, 2001
JUL 1 J G�� � 1 G • 1 J 1 1\ V 1 •�r Y�v. ✓��.���v . ...... ��� . _ . _-_ _ .
Order No: 230052
LBC�P,L DgSCRIPTYODi
PARCEL I:
A portion of Lota 1, 2 and 12, Hlock, 19; Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 20; and Lot 9, Block
21, TOWN OF METZGER, a plat of record in Washington County, TOOETHER WITH portions o�
vacated S.w, Madison Street, vacated S.W. Maplelea� Street (Maple S�reet West) , and
vacated Maple Street East, situated in the NOrtheast one-quarter oE the Northeast
one-quarter of Section 35, To�nship 1 South, Range 1 west, willamette Meridian, �.n the
City of Tigard, County of Washington and Scate of Oregon, being more particular].y
described as foliows:
Beginning at the interseCtion of the Easterly zi.ght o£ way ].xne o£ S.W. 90th Avenue
(Monroe Street) , a 50.00 foot wide public roadway, with the centerlirie of vacated S.W.
Mapleleaf Street (Maple Street West) , said point of beginning bears North DO°35'08"
West 25.00 feet �xom the Northwest corner of Lot 4, Block 19, TOWN OF METZGER; thence
along the centerline of said vacated S,W. Mapleleaf Street, North 89°28' 00" East,
105.29 feet; thence leaving said line, South 53°33'99" East, 57.62 feet; thence Norch
79°23� 04�� East, 60.89 �eet; thence North 30°03'49" Eaet, 27.87 feet to the centezline
of said vacated S.W. Mapleleaf Street; thence along said centerline, North 89°28` 00"
East, 237.31 feet co the Weaterly right of way line of the abandoned Oregon Electric
Ra��road; chence along said Westerly right of way line, aloag the arc of a 1885.09
foot radius non-tangent curve concave to the North�►esC, through a central angle of
10°45'25" (chord bears South 41°35' S7^ West, 353.39 feet) a distar►ce of 353.91 feet to
the centerline of vacated S.W. Madison Streetr thence along said centerline, North
0o°35� OB�� west, 97.05 feet; Chence leaving said centerline, South e9°29� 00" west,
125.20 feet to the West line of Lot 12, Block ].9, Z'OWN OF METZGERs thence along said
line, and continuing along the west line of Lot 2, Slock 19, said plat and the
Northeriy extensi.on thereof, North 00°35� 08° West, i5o,02 feet; thence leaving said
line, along a line parallel with and 15.00 feet distant and Southerly from Lhe
centerline of said vacated S.w. Mapleleaf Streer, South 99°26'00" West, 100.26 feet tv
the Easteriy right of way li.ne of said S.W. 90th Avenu�; thence along said right of
way line, North 00°35' 06" West, 15.00 feet to the point of beg�.nni.ng.
PARCEL II:
A portion of Lots 8, 9 and 10, Hlock 9 and a porcion of Lots 1 and 2, Slock 3.9, TOWN
OF METZGER, a plat of record in 'Washington County, TOGETHER wITH portions of vacated
S.W. Madison Street and vacated S_W. Mapleleaf StreeL (Maple Street West) , situated in
the Northeast one-qua�ter of the Northeast one-quarter of Section 35, Townahip 1
South, Range 7� Weat, Willamette Meridian, in the Cicy of Tigard, County of washing�on
and State of Oregon, being more parzicularly described as followa:
Beginning at the intersection of the Easterly right of way line of S.w. 90th Avenue
(Monroe Street) , a 50.00 foot wide public roadway, with the centexline of vacated S.w.
Maple�eaf Street (Maple Street west) , said point of beginni.ng bears North o0°35'06"
West 25 .00 feet from che Northwest corner of LoC 4. B1oCk 19, TOWN OF METZG�R; CheriCe
along the Easterly rzght of way line of said S.W. 9�th Avenue, Norch 00°35' 08" West,
15.00 feet; thence leaving eaid line, along a ii.ne parallel wich and 15.00 feet
distant and Norcheriy from the centerline of said vacated S.W. Mapleleaf Street, North
89°28' 00" East, 98.24 feet; thence leaving said centerline, North 00°35' 08" WesL,
85.00 feet to the Nozch line of che SouLh �5.00 feet of Lot 8, 81ock 4, TOWN OF
METZGER; thence along said North line, and continui.ng along the Norch line of the
South 75.00 feet of Lots 9 and i0, Hlock 4, sald plat, and Che Easterly extension
thereof, North 99°28' 00" Eaet, 137.22 feec to the centerline of said vacated S.W.
Madison Street; thence along said line, South 00°35'06" East, 7.00.00 feet to the
- ..�
JUL l� G�� l 1G � G� rK LI1V-UtV/CLUK.JVLS ��3 4 ( l (GGJ IV ���J04,��G� r .GG/� f
Order No: 230052
LEGAL DESCRZPTIO�
centerline of said vacated S.W_ Mapleleaf Street; thence leaving said centerline,
South 30°03'48" weat, 27,87 feet; thence South 79°23'04^ West, 60.89 feet; thence
North 53°33'49" West, 57.62 teet to the centerline of said vacated S.W. Mapleleaf
Street; �hence along eaid centerline, South 89°28'00" Wesc, 105.29 feet to the point
of beginning.
'a
. � ,�
�
���
J UL� I .y Cbb i I C � G17 r K l. I l l.-UCV� DLLR . JvI.J JCJV �+ 1 � � u�v �v JJV V V'�V V V v�+ . . � • - � �
-� ' - I�It1AL� j1�lAT
�r • • �' �' . �ew. •� ■rYa��
_ I _ . . . +�r.� ..+ �r.►�sr— ——— �. ... � �.. • - -•-
1 � � I
v
.
, � • � • • i 4
ed' �' ■o' •o� � ' Mr . w ' � M' � ��4�
�.�.3 � I �� I � I �Z ! � 1� ! � � w'
� � I � �� � � l � ( � � l.. O {�1�1
, Q I � I e I x �e �� I t� N'1/ ! � �� � .
� - ' �
� ...�_ �3. _ -i! _. � �_ -�.?�_ � —R `•� -., ,�{ ,
W !
90� ( � � e . �iw • ��i.
I � � �Z '� pl � I I + V�0 �Q� /
r •
� ��n —�• �� ��� Y �
� � .. _ _ 1 12 ,s� y � .���, �
o �2 � + �` 80� �'� » W � .' / , ;�
� s cc.s.�s�� I�� � _a � � 1 s' _ �IT ��. . • � � � ,
, � � � w r •. � � 1 � La" �� / /. r (.
I e0e ,,. W .� r '�.
_ � � � I � � T i � � .j � � � � �v �. �
� R . � � �I � � I ,�. � �� 0
• • I � i �o• .�► � � � �.
. 7 � �s e fJ,�• �lQ4o�_ J �3.11'�dl�� �a�'.�1 � / � "(G
�.4 . � � ` , .
� ��Q / � � .
� +...__ ��_ � /�� . ;
Q -��' �o i, I �N'-1ii' T isar�.
, � � i �J� � I �-,� ' i �,-� ' ' ' � ,.
I °� � I � � o
"� - I OI � � �� � �
100 � 1 `I�
4' �3 2 �L . 13 �2 �� �
ioo�' — �o� ' � e0• ,Li�_*I s��.s�'
. :e . • �--—-- ———
P �S 12 ' � �
- - - -- .
Ai Y:I I�1 i� �� L�� - �se�
P' 401 . SEE MAP
6 ._1 — I�, Y � - .:) :1�e � ISI' 36AA -
, � � , . . S1JI�LEMlNTAL
� 7 1102 �p 1100 � ��. 1200 �I . NO.1
� �. � �
LI
e �,a�s� �
•
eo' 8� �oo' 9 ss' a ���.1' 7�0'
so, �120�0 � � �3�00 ' ;�707 ' r'- � _
�� a ��, a� �sj.
• , � ��e.l M•. 1�M�►
. 3902 ' 3 9 O� �ti . � -
. K+.a.
37b� 37'GI 3T0� �
CHICAGO T17�E INSURANCE C011APANY �� 2
N � ( ��w ti_ � w
3��� �+ '
11aD number _ � ! � �
This plat is for your aid in locating � � ��� �
your land with reference to streets and L �, �� � � ��
others pal'cels• While this plab is � �
believed to be correCt, Ehe company • '
� �
� � d �� K • �
assumes no lia6ility for any loss � » �
occurring by resson of reliance �
bhereon. 1 • , � � � .�aM' t .• � .1 �
�
:j
W W Tf1T�l o0r_C n� w+4
Rug 27 03 02: 39p Murphy �^99681674 p. l
,
A
� � , � , �
FAX TRANSMITTAL MEMO
To: City of Tigard, Planning
AnN: Matt Scheidegger
FAx #: 503-684-7297
DATE: 8/28/03
Re: Fineview partitions, CWS's Senrice Provider �etter
MESSAGE: Hi Matt. As we discussed.
o � �
C �
�
� Zo �
■Phone 503. 624-4625 IFax 503.968.Y674 ■ejmurphyCaol.com
Rug 27 03 02: 39p Murphy 5n39681674 p. 2
� �
� ,� Ffle Number
� ���a�'�?��t�� �e�vi��s ��2�
" C1u-F.°sp�►►tirirfinen.t is clear.
Clean Water Services
Service Provider Letter
Jurisdiction Tigard Date 8/22/03
Map &Tax Lot 1 S135AA 00901l01400 Owner Dan Boyden
Contact Fishman Environm�nta!
Site Address E. of SW 90 & S. of Liz French
SW Locust St, Tigard Address 434 NW 6 , Suite 304
Proposed Activity Land partition Portland, OR 97209-3600
Phone 503.224.0333
Thls form and the attached conditlans will serve as your Servlce Provider Letter in
accordance with Clean Water Services Design and Constructlon Standards (R&O 03-11).
YES NO YES W NO
tVatural Resources Altematives Analysis
Assessment(NRA) � � Required � �
Subrnitted (Section 3.02.6)
District Site Visit � � Tier 1 Alternatives Analysis � �
Date: 8/20/03
Concur with NRA/or � � Tier 2 Altematives Analysis � �
submitted information
Sensitive Area Present � ❑ Vegetated CoRidor ❑ �
On-Site Avereging
Sensifive Area Present � ❑ Vegetated Corridor � a
Off-Site Mitigation Required
Vegetated Corridvr
Present On-Site � � On-Site M�igation � �
Width of Vegetated 2g Tt Off-Site Mitigation � a �
Corridor(feet)
Condition of Vegetated Planting Plan Attached
Corrldor Degraded Final plantlnp plan required � �
prlor to construction
Enhancement Required � � EnhancemenUrestoratlon
completion date
Encroachment into
Vegetated Co�ridor � � RSAT(no longer required) � � �
{Section 3,02,4}
-------------.._.........__...._
7ype and Square Footage Geotechnical Report a �
of Encroachment required
Allowed Use � � Condit�ons Attached � �
(Sec6on 3_02.4.b.2)
This Service Provider Letter does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect
water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequentty dlscovered on your
property.
Page 'f of 3
Rug 27 03 02: 39p Murphy 5n39681674 p. 3
� . .
' � File Number
. z�S'
In order to compty with Clean Water Services {the District) water quality
protection requirements the project must comply with the foflowing conditions:
Standard Conditions
1. No structures, developmer�t, constructlon activities,gardens, lawns, application of chemicals,
uncontained areas of hazardous materials as defined by Oregon Department of Environmental
Quality, pet wastes, dumping of materials of any kind,or other activfties shall be permitted v+tithin
the sensitive area which may negatively impact water quality,except those allowed by Section
3.02.3.b.
2. No structures, development, construction act[vitles, gardens, lawns,application of chernicals,
uncontained areas of hazardous materials as defined by Oregon Department of Envlronmental
� Qua[ity, pet wastes, dumping of materla{s af any klnd,or otfier activities shall be permitted within
the vegetated corridor whlch may negatively impact water quality,except those allowed by
Section 3.02.4.b.2).
3. Prior to any site clearing,grading or construction the vegetated corridor and water quality
sensitive areas shall be surveyed,staked, and temporarily fenced per approved plan. During
construction the vegetated corridor shall remain fenced and undisturbed except as allowed by
Section 3.02,5.a and perapproved pla�s. �
4. For vegetated corridors 50 feet wide or greater,the first 50 feet closest to the sensitive area shalt
be equal to or better than a"good°corrldor condition as definetf In Section 3.02.7,Table 3.2.
5. For vegetated corridors less than 50 feet wide,the entire vegetated corridor shall be equal to or
better than a°good"corridor condition as defined in Section 3.02.7,Table 3.2.
6_ An approved Oregvn Department of Forestry Nofification is required for one or more trees
harvested for sale,trade,or barter, on any non-federal lands within the State of Oregon.
7. Clean Water Services shall be notified 72 hours prior to the start and completion of
enhancement/restoration activities. Enhancement/resto�atio�activities shal!comply with the
guidelines provided in Landscape Requirements (R&0 03-11;Appendix D).
8. Protection of the vegetated corridors and associated sensitive areas shall be provlded by the
installation of aermanent fencfna and signage between the development and the outer limits of
the vegetated corridors.
9. Appropriate Best Managament Practices(BMP's)for Erosion Control, in accordance with tt�e
CWS Erosion Control Technical Guidance Manual shall be used prior to,during, and following
earth disturbing activi6es.
10. Prior fo const�uction, a Stormwater Connection Perrrrit from the District or its designee is required
pursuant to Ordinance 27, Section 4.B.
11. For any developments,which create multipls parcels or lots intended for separate ownership,the
District shall require that the vegetated corridor and the sensitive area be conEained in a separate
tract.
42. The District or City/County may requfre an easement over the vegetated corridor conveying
storm, surtace water management,and/or sanitary sewer rights t�the District or City that woutd
prevent the owner of the vegetated cor�idor ftam acttvities and uses inconsistent with the purpose
of the corridor and any easements therein.
Page 2 of 3
Rug 27 03 02: 40p Murphy 5n�9681674 p, 4
' File Number
Z�S
� Speciai Condltions
13. 1?ae vegetated corridor width for sensitive areas within the project site shall be a minlmum of 25
feet wide, as measured horizontally from the delineated boundary of the sensitive area,
14. Prior to any activity within the sensitive area, the applicant shalt gain authorization foc ti�e project
from the Oregon Division of State Lands{DSL)and US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The
applicant shall provide the District with copies of all D5L and USACE project authorization
permits.
i 5. Rrior to instaUation of plant materials,all invasive vegetation within ths vegetated corridor shaA be
removed. During removal of invasive vegetation care shall be taken to minimize impacts to
existing native trees and shrub species.
16. Enhancementlrestoration af the vegetated cor�idor shall be provided In accordance with the
atfiached planting plan and R&O 03-11,Appendix D.
17. Prior to any site clearing, grading or construction, the applicant shall provide the District with the
required vegetated corrEdor enhancemenUrestoration plan in compliance with R&O 03-11.
18, Maintenance and monitoring requtrements shall comply with Section 2.11.2 of R&O 03-11. If at
any time during the wa�ranty perlod the landscaping falls below the 80%survival level,the Owner
shall reinstall all deficient planting at the next appropriate planting opportunity and the two year
maintenance period shalE begin again from the dats of replanting.
19. Performance assurances for the vegetated corridor shall comply with Section 2.06.2,Tabfe 2-1.A
and Section 2.10,Table 2-2.2. �
20. Activities located with{n the 100-year floodplain shall comply wlth Section 3.13 of R&O 03-11.
21. Removal of native,woody vegetation shalt be minimized to the greatest extent practicable.
22. A Maintenance Plan shall be included on flnal p(ans, induding methods, responsible party contact
information, and dates(minimum two fimes pe�year, by June 1 and September 30).
Please call(503)846�647 wlth any questions.
��� i /C-C,I,�
Colin MacLaren
Site Assessment Coordlnator
Attachments(1)
Page 3 of 3
♦�♦ ED MURPHY St ASSOCIATES
� l,cnrr( ('.�•<� l'(u�riiiiry ait�l I)r-��r-luj�l�t���tt 5����t�it�c��
July 23, 2003
Matt Scheidegger, Assistant Planner
City of Tigard - Community Development Department
13125 SW Hall Bivd.
Tigard, Oregon 97223
RE: Application for Minor Partition, "Fineview - Partition #1"
WCTM iS135AA, Tax Lot 901.
Dear Mr. Scheidegger:
Thank you for your letter dated June 30, 2003 requesting 16 additional packets af
submittal material, and ownership information. With this letter, I am submitting
the additional copies, including 16 full-sized sets of drawings. I am also attaching
ownership information.
As we discussed previously, this is a re-application for a partition that was approved
by the City in May of 2000. The approval expired before the �nal plat was
submitted. The previous file number is MLP 1999-00017. (Note that the tax lot
number has changed. What was tax lot 1000 is now tax lot 9Q1).
The application materials being submitted are copies of the 2000 application.
Please feel free to call me if you have any questions or need additional information.
Thank-you Matt.
R�C��� ��:.
Sincerely,
�UL252
G1�Y O��IGAR�
�,��. ;
Ed Murphy, AIC
Q10.Y�r '�`�l
cc: Dan Boyden
yti�; SW Murdvcls Sf. 1'i_yarrl, Oreyo�t y7zzq
/ Phone So3. 6s4.q.6zS /Cellular So3. 3i4.o677 /Fax 503. g68.i674
♦�♦ ED MURPHY & ASSOCIATES
� l.unrl ["se P(n�ziiirty atrrl IJ�-rc�lnj,ir�r�rit Sr-i�r•ic��s
May 28, 2003
Matt Scheidegger, Assistant Planner
City of Tigard - Community Development Department
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, Oregon 97223
RE: Applications for Minor Partitions, "Fineview"
WCTM 1S135AA, Tax Lots 901 and 1000.
Dear Mr. Scheidegger:
As we discussed previously, the owners of the tax lots referenced above would like
to re-apply for the two partitions that were approved by the City in May of 2000.
The approval expired before the final plats were submitted. The previous file
numbers are MLP 1999-00017 and MLP 1999-00018. (Note, however, that the tax
lot numbers have changed. What was tax lot 1301 is now tax lot 1000, and what
was formerly tax lot 1000 is now tax lot 901.}
I checked with Heidi Berg at the Clean Water Services agency, who informed me of
the following:
1. Because the wetland area, both on- and off-site, is less than i/2 acre, the
setback required for the buffer area would be 25', not 50'. (The wetland area is
only about 11,200 square feet). The previously proposed partition of the
property which has the wetland on it, 1S135AA0901, called for the creation of a
separate tract of land that would encompass the wetland area, including the 25'-
wide buffer area. Ms. Berg said that the same buffer width would be acceptable
today.
2. The wetland determination and delineation analysis should be relatively recent,
i.e., it should not be more than five years old. The wetland determination and
delineation report was completed by SRI/Shapiro in April of 1998. However,
according to Ms. Berg, the five year time period starts on the date that the
Division of State Lands (DSL) accepts the report. As you can see from the
attached letter from Annette Lafka to Philip Morford, the DSL concurred with the
conclusions of the wetland delineation report on March 7, 2000. That means
that the previously submitted wetland determination and delineation report is
still valid today.
3. The only thing that CWS will require is a natural resource assessment of the
current condition of the wetland buffer area. We have just initiated that
assessment, and expect to have it completed soon.
��,ti�; Slti' :'1�1u���iock St. Tigar�l, Or���q��n gTzz4
. / Nhone 503. 6z4.q.6zs /Cellular 503. 3i4.o677 /Fax So3. g68.�674
Because the situation is virtually the same as when these partitions were approved
in ]une of 2000 {that is, the zone and the applicable standards have not changed),
we can keep this very simple and straight-forward. The City already has in its files
the complete application materials, including the SRI/Shapiro report. We are not
proposing any changes to the partition plans. Therefore, you should be able to
easily process these applications using the previously submitted documents and the
previously written staff report. Therefore, we would like to waive the pre-
application conference, and start the review process.
Attached are the following:
• Two application forms
• Two separate checks for $1935 each
• Two sets of mailing labels for each application
• A copy of the letter from DSL, dated 3/7/00
• The first page of the Notice of Type II Decision" for each partition, for
reference.
We will complete the natural resource assessment, submit it to the Clean Water
Services Agency and the City, and subsequently obtain a service provider letter
from Clean Water Services as quickly as we can.
Please feef free to call me if you have any questions or need additional information.
Thank-you Matt.
Sincerely,
Ed Murphy, AICP
cc: Dan Boyden
e,j►►✓boyden/fineview�matt�et/s�28/o3 2
� ' .
r �•
!
����t,,.,�`�,�,t�, , � �y, �� ': . _; '
�� a �- , �� `�� � ��� .� - N�TICE OF TYPE II�DECISION� � �
� ? 4 5.4Y y � `, °' �_ .. . ._ ' . .
� !`Y �=j � K � _`: MINOR LAND PARTITION�(MLP) 1999•00017
CtTY O�TiGARD
�' � �� � Co�nunity Development
� �' FINEVIEW PARTITION #1 Shaping A Better
, �;
� � , �:�.� cqmmunity
_ ,. ,:
120 DAYS = 08/29/2000
SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY
FILE NAME: - FINEVIEW PARTITION
CASE NO: Minor Land Partition (MLP) MLP1999-00017
PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Minor Land Partition approval to partition a parcel of
land within the city limits of Tigard. The parcel is 0.41 acres. The proposal is to
divide the property into two parcels of 7,764 square feet and 8,222 square feet.
Both parcels having approximately 15 feet of frontage along SW 90th Avenue.
APPLICANT: Fineview Farm, L.L.C.
15500 SW Jay Street
Beaverton, OR 97006
OWNER: Pacific Crest Partners
1430 Eastside Road
Hood River, OR 97031
ZONING
DESIGNATION: R-4.5, Low Density Residential. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to
accommodate detached single-family homes with o� without accessory residential
• units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-
% family units are peRnitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also
i permitted conditionally.
� LOCATION: Located east of SW 90th Avenue, 330 feet south of SW Locust Sfreet;
WCTM 1S135AA, Tax Lot '�69A� 901.
,� PROPOSED PARCEL 1: 7,764 Square Feet.
; PROPOSED PARCEL 2: 8,222 Square Feet.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.745,
18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
SECTION II DECISION
,
� ���Vofice sher'ebt <iven:fha�the Ciiy of:Tigard Community Development Director's designee,has
� ,�:k ,� }�, .� r.��:���'V�OVED"the��b�ove;reqiies���sub�ecfito:cer�ain�ainditioiis �k � �� �� ;
..::tt'^`ri��1:-' ,.�nz`e' �`r• ,�r_ ,s.K »t ..s�si.�#.e..f ..a_:, mr .a�l..
MLP1999-00017/FINEVIEW PARTITION#1 PAGE 1 OF 12
� .
4
CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISIONlCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT � .
����
' � i I �------------�
' I --�—
- . ' i------ --1 TL 805
� r-----------� i
I w I T 90 � TL 905 I �
, � � L 2 I I
ILZ i I 1 r-----------�
� I I � TL 806 �
iQ -------- �
----------
TL 100 i = � PROPOSED .
, I
l o i PQrcel 1 / TL 800 �
� � I TL 901 ��- ��I �� L---------�
i /
—- -—-- I � � � ,�PROPOSED �
� � __�� Parcel 2 �
SW MAPLE ��
STREET �_............____......T.\ -
------� ' . . ;
� I In i oo� � .
� `'`�� �000 ,,
i i � . TL #39fi /
i
I L -------I \\ / �\C
TL 100 � I ; ��,.\ /� Q
i I i � i•;•'� OQ.
I ' TL 1002 I
I ; j� P��-
' � �
, , . �:
� � _ � ���/ '
, � �-------- � �
� , ---�oo-
� �
1 TL 1101 P�P,�
,
i / 'SCAIE.• 1�40'
, � �i i
C'� �F TIGA � FINEVIEW PARTITION #1 -_
RD LEGEND
SITE PLAN H (MLP)1999-00017 pROPOSED PARTITION LINE
(Map is not to scale) ________________�____
2-LOT PARTITION
FI N EVI E W � PARTITION # 1.
MLP 2003 - 00011
( FoRMER�Y M LP 1999-00017)
SUBMITTED BY :
ED MURPHY S� ASS� CIATES
ON BEHALF OF :
DAN BOYDEN, FINEVIEW FARM LLC
Ju�Y 23, 2003
� ED MURPHY & ASSOCIATES
Q ���� �" ��� Lnncl U�r� 1'lan�ninq ancl llevclor�mcnt Services
1 ��
�
J�� 251�
G1�Y �FSIG�,``, ]uly 23, 2003
.,:=��"'` . .,
�, �� ,. �1
Matt Scheidegger, Assistant Planner
City of Tigard - Community Development Department
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, Oregon 97223
RE: Application for Minor Partition, "Fineview - Partition #1"
WCTM iS135AA, Tax Lot 9Q1.
Dear Mr. Scheidegger:
Thank you for your letter dated June 30, 2003 requesting 16 additional packets of
submittal material, and ownership information. With this letter, I am submitting
the additional copies, including 16 full-sized sets of drawings. I am also attaching
ownership information.
As we discussed previously, this is a re-application for a partition that was approved
by the City in May of 2Q00. The approval expired before the final plat was
submitted. The previous file number is MLP 1999-00017. (Note that the tax lot
number has changed. What was tax lot 1000 is now tax lot 901).
The application materials being submitted are copies of the 2000 application.
Please feel free to call me if you have any questions or need additional information.
Thank-you Matt.
Sincerely,
Ed Murphy, AIC
cc: Dan Boyden
9875 SW M�irdock St. Tigard, Oregon 97z24
/Phnne ,503. 6zq.q6z5 /Cellular 503. 3i4.o677 /Fax So3. g68.i674
. .
CO� V 1L GEOGRAPMIC iNFOPMATIOM BYSTEM
ST AREA NOTIFIED �
(500')
,�
_ n��,
i .,�.,.�. ,,...
��no
.,�.�« __________
iVNtINN , ,,,�.� ,���� � � � �� � FOR: Ed Murphy
� ERIMIJM
..YR�N�7Y1
RE: 1 S 13 5AA, 901
ST =_________
�— � °°,�.,,,
��o�, � �
761�8�71 s�Q� �.
us�am xaaana Aneueew�
.�,,�« �..�
� Property owner Information
i Cn �,,,,� is valfd for 3 months from
� the date printed on this map.
� .,�.�w.
4ASIUCIA06
.: � . - CA54�!!q ��� i17UA0/q1
� � � � ^St i' _y I ' f1�YY77M
i17611N�11
f a,'
; i svwunw� � rnsuu�w.
'itl6MMfN 1 7S]GY06M
��w��. m ��� .
'I�fMKNiY
MAPLELEAF ST —� �s5►» „�. >
� � ,��. Q
�� ¢ � ��
�.
. sA ��vnbui�fso� �;I
I � s bM�M
' xusunwz t°01K�"' me �
v ee �
� suwomee ! I
� m�suann �a�� I
e eae we�
t su�e
xo �w�u �
. � � . �,:��� .,'�y�''�ka,�'`,;,+x,�a suduw smun�oo
v cn mo6uape
.. . °°wun°a s°a"u"�o itu oa oa �
--- N
-�� �
n xiniwrno I xawum �
avsa,�a�nt I
�e� �oo I � 0 100 200 300 Feet
�--�
Oxt�sua�oa. ��8� � 1"=214 feet
snsuanu �
smuo��ou
m�su�woea
tmsua�w�
�rz� ���� C776Y07101 �
�� ' � � ST
City of Tigard
OAInformation on lhia map ia for qeneral location only and
should be vsrified with ths DevelopmeN Servicet Diviaion.
iJ725 SW H�tl Blvd
. Tipud,OR 97223
, (503)839-4/71
n��,w�.a.uy.ra.or.�.
C,.-„n��.,�ty n.,ve�..,,n„-..+ o�ot�'�te�""av��,9^�3:r'1m^,,ic��.qC���g �pR
Fineview Farm 2-Lot Partition
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Applicant's Statement
Exhibits
Exhibit `A' Fineview Farm Tree Protection and Removal Plan, dated June 26, 2001
Exhibit `B' Letter from USA, dated May 15, 2000
Exhibit `C' Set of 2-lot partition plan drawings
Sheet 1 of 5- Cover/Index of Drawings
Sheet 2 of S-Preliminary Plat
Sheet 3 of 5- Contour Map
Sheet 4 of 5- Preliminary Utility Plan
Sheet 5 of S- On-site/ Off-site Analysis
Sheet 1 of 1 -Tree Preservation Plan
r� °cf_.��i ' �
(� Design
��V Grou
p
Inc. April 21,2000
APPLICANT'S STATEMENT
APPLICANT'S
PLANNERS �P�SENTATIVE: LDC Design Group, Inc.
APPLICANT/OWNER: Dan Boyden
ENGINEERS Pacific Crest Partners, Inc.
1430 Eastside Road
SURVEYORS Hood River, OR 97031
REQUEST: 2-Lot Partition
SIZE: Tax Lot 1000, 1.21 Acres
HILLSBORO LOCATION: East of SW 90"'Avenue, 225 Feet
(CORPORATE OFFICEf South of SW Locust Street
3300 NW 211TH TERRACE
HILLSBORO, OR 97124 LAND USE DISTRICT: R-4.5 (Low Density Residential
5Q3.858.4242
FAx: 503.645.5500 D1Sh'1Ct�
www.ldcdesign.com
SALEM I. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
3400 STATE STREET
Suire G-710
SALEM,OR 97301 A. Tigard Community Development Code:
503.370.8424
Fnx: 503.370.8426 Chapter 18.390: Decision-Making Procedures
Idcs�ldcdesign.com Chapter 18.420: Land Partitions
Chapter 18.510: Residential Zoning Districts
VANCOUVER Chapter 18.705: Access, Egress and Circulation
ssis NE HAZE�oE��a�E. Chapter 18.715: Density Computations
su�re 2oz Chapter 18.725: Environmental Performance
VANCOUVER,WA 98665 Standards
360.573.0370 Chapter 18.745: Landscaping and Screening
To��FREE: 503.241.8657 Chapter 18.775: Sensitive Lands Review
Fax: 360.573.0390
Idcv�ldcdesign.com Chapter 18.790: Tree Removal
Chapter 18J95: Visual Clearance Areas
KLEIN CONSULTING Chapter 18.797: Water Resource (WR)Overlay
ENGINEERS, INC. District
3300 NW Z'I�TH TERRACE Chapter 18.810: Street&Utility Improvement
HILLSBORO, OR 97124 Standards
503.858.4242
Fax: 503.645.5500
kce@Idcdesign.com
MECKEL ENGINEERING
& SURVEYING, INC. 1
COEUR D�ALENE, IDAHO
www.meckel.com
II. INTRODUCTION
The applicant is requesting approval of a 2-lot partition as shown on the attached development plans.
The site is located east of SW 90`�'Avenue, 330 feet of SW Locust Street. The site slopes gradually to
the southeast. Uses to the north, east and south are zoned R-4.5 and are similar in use. Metzger
Elementary School lies to the west of the site across SW 90`�'Avenue. The common accessway shown on
the attached plans will be constructed after the partition has recorded and prior to the issuance of
building pertnits.
III. FINDINGS
A. CITY OF TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
COD�NT:
Except where required by the Community Development Code, this application is not required to address
goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as it relates to development of the subject property, since
the Plan is implemented by the Code. The subject property is situated within Washington County's
Metzger-Progress Community Plan. However, there are no general or specific design elements on the
Community Plan that are applicable to the requested partition. According to the Metzger-Progress
Significant Natural Resources Map, the subject property is not designated as containing any significant
natural resources. However,there is a wetland located on the site as shown on the attached site plan
(Exhibit 1).
B. TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE:
CHAPTER 18.390: DECISION-MAKING PROCEDURES
18.390.040: Type II Procedure
A. Preapplication Conference. A preapplication conference is required for Type II
actions. Preapplication conference requirements and procedures are set forth in
section 18.390.080C.
B. Application requirements.
1. Application Forms. Type II applications shall be made on forms provided
by the Director as provided by Section 18.390.080 El;
2. Submittal Information. The application shall:
a. Include the information requested on the application form;
b. Address the relevant criteria in sufficient detail for review and
action;
c. Be accompanied by the required fee;
2
\�I.DCFIFS 11PROJECTS�Projects\7009\DOCS1Repons\part-2.doc
d. Include two sets of pre-stamped and pre-addressed envelopes for all
property owners of the record as specified in Section 18.390.040C.
The records of the Washington County Department of Assessment
and Taxation are the official records for determining ownership.
The applicant shall demonstrate that the most current assessment
records have been used to produce the notice list;
e. Include an impact study. The impact study shall quantify the effect
address, at a minimum,the transportation system,including
bikeways,the drainage system, the parks system,the water system
the sewer system, and the noise impacts of the development. For
each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall
propose improvements necessary to meet City standards and to
minimize the impact of the development on the public at large,
public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In
situations where the Community Development Code requires the
dedication of real property interests,the applicant shall either
specifically concur with the dedication requirements,or provide
evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property
dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected
impacts of the development.
COMMENT:
According to Table 18.390.1 a Land Partition is a Type II Procedure. As a result, this application is
submitted under the Type II procedure. The applicable forms have been completed and the appropriate
fee has been paid to the City of Tigard.
CHAPTER 18.420: LAND PARTITIONS
18.420.040: Application Submission Requirements
A. General submission requirements. All applications shall be made on forms
provided by the Director and shall include information required for a Type II
application,as governed by Chapter 18.390.
1. The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance
requirements and regulations;
2. There are adequate public facilities available to serve the proposal;
3. All proposed improvements meet City and applicable agency standards;
and
4. All proposed lots conform to the specific requirements below:
3
\�I,DCHFS 1�PRO]ECT'S�Projecfs�7009\DOCS\Rcports\part-2.doc
a. The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot
requirement of the applicable zoning district.
b. The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district.
In the case of a flag lot,the accessway may not be included in the lot
area calculation.
c. Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public
b
15-foot wide access easement.
d. Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district.
e. When the partitioned lot is a tlag lot,the developer may determine
the location of the front yard,provided that no side yard is less than
10 feet. Structures shall generally be tocated so as to maximize
separation from existing structures.
f. A screen shall be provided along the property tine of a lot of record
where the paved drive in an accessway is located within ten feet of
an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.745.040. Screening
may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to
provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed development.
g. The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where
the length of an accessway would have a detrimental effect on fire-
fighting capabilities.
h. W[iere a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one lot,
a reciprocal easement which will ensure access and maintenance
rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map.
COMMENT:
A City of Tigard Type II partition application form is submitted with this request. The proposed
partition complies with the above criteria and the standards of the R-4.5 District as shown on the attached
development plans.
B. Specific submission requirements. All applications shall include the preliminary lot
line map and necessary information in graphic and/or written form. The Director
shall provide the applicant with detailed information about these submission
requirements.
COMl�'IENT:
The Applicant's Statement, in conjunction with the attached development plans(Exhibit 1), meets the
submission requirements detailed by the Director and the Tigard Community Code.
4
\�L.DCHFS 11PROJEC'CS1Projects�7009\DOCS�Reports�part-2.doc
CHAPTER 18.510: RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
TABLE 18.510.2
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES
STANDARD R-1 R-2 R-3.5 R�.S R-7
Minimum Lot Size
0
-Duplexes 10,000 sq.ft. 10,000 sq.ft.
-Attached unit 1 5,000 s .ft.
Average Minimum Lot Width
-Detached unit lots 100 ft. l00 ft. 65 ft. 50 ft. 50 ft.
-Duplex lots 90 ft. 90 ft. SO ft.
-Attached unit lots 40 ft.
Maximum Lot Coveta e - - - - 8�% Z
Minimum Setbacks
-Front yard 30 ft. 30 R. 20 ft. 20 ft. 15 ft.
-Side facing street on
comer&through lots 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. 15 ft. 10 ft.
-Side yard 5 R. 5 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft.
-Rear yard 25 ft. 25 ft. 15 ft. I S ft. I 5 ft.
-Side or rear yard abutting more
restrictive zoning district 30 ft.
-Distance between properry line
and front of ara c 20 ft. 20 ft. 2U ft. 20 ft. 20 ft.
Maximum Hei ht 30 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft. 35 R.
Minimum Landsca e Re uirement - - - - 20%
[1]Single-family attached residential units permitted at one dwelling per lot with no more that five attached units in one grouping_
[2]Lot coverage includes all buildings and impervious surfaces.
COMMENT:
The proposed lots will comply with the dimensional and setback standards of the R-4.5 District as shown
on the attached development plans (Exhibit 1). -
CHAPTER 18.705: ACCESS,EGRESS,AND CIRCULATION
18.705.020 Applicability of Provisions
A. When provisions apply. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development
including the construction of new structures,the remodeling of existing structures (see
Section 18.360.050),and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading
requirements which changes the access requirements.
COIVIlVIENT:
The proposed project will comply with the standards of Chapter 18.705,Access,Egress and Circulation
as illustrated by the attached plans.
5
\U,DCHFSI�PROJECfS�Projects\7009�DOCS�Rcports�part-2.doc
18.705.030 General Provisions
C. Joint access. Owners of two or more uses,structures, or parcels of land may agree
to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of
both uses,structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as
designated in this title, provided:
1. Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds,
> >
2. Copies of the deeds, easements,leases or contracts are placed on permanent
lile witli the City.
COMMENT:
The proposed lots will have joint access as shown on the attached development plans(Exhibit 1). Copies
of the deeds granting access to individual owners will be submitted and filed with the City upon plat
recording.
H. Minimum access requirements for residential use.
1. Vehicular access and egress for single-family,duplex or attached single-
family d�velling units on individual lots and multi-family residential uses
shall not be less than 19 as provided in Table 18.705.1 and Table 18.705.2;
TABLE 18.705.1
VEffiCULAR ACCESS/EGRESS REQUIItEMENTS:
RESIDENTIAL USE 6 OR FEWER iJ1vITS
Number Dwelling Minimum Number of Minimum Access Minimum Pavement
UnitlLots Driveways Required Width Width
1 or 2 1 15' 10'
3-6 1 20' 20'
COMMENT:
The proposed access will comply with the above standard as illustrated on the attached plans.
3. Private residential access drives shall be provided and maintained in
accordance with the provisions of the Uniform Fire Code;
4. Access drives in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with approved
provisions for the turning around of fire apparatus by one af the following:
a. A circular,paved surface having a minimum turn radius measured
from center point to outside edge of 35 feet;
b. A hammerhead-con�gured,paved surface with each leg of the
6
\�LDCNFS 11PROJECTS1Projects\7009\DOCS1Reports�part-2.doc
hammerhead having a minimum depth of 40 feet and a minimum
width of 20 feet;
c. The maximum cross slope of a required turnaround is 5%.
COMMENT:
The proposed access will comply with the provisions of the Uniform Fire Code as illustrated by the
aace p .
CHAPTER 18.715: DENSITY COMPUTATIONS
A. Definition of net development area. Net development area,in acres,shall be
determined by subtracting the following land area(s) from the gross acres,which is
all of the land included in the legal description of the property to be developed:
B. Calculating the maximum number of residential units. To calculate the maximum
number of residential units per acre, divide the number of square feet in the net
acres by the minimum number of square feet required for each lot in the applicable
zoning district.
C. Calculating tlie minimum number of residential units. As reqnired by Section
18.510.040,the minimum number of residential units per net acre shall be
calculated by multiplying the maximum number of units determined in Subsection
B above by 80% (0.8).
C011��IIVIENT:
The gross development area Tax Lot 1301 is 52,485 square feet. The net development area of Tax Lot
1301 is 40,767 square feet(52,485 — 11,718 for the wetland). The maximum number of residential units
o the propetty is 5.4 [(52,485— 11,718]/7,500=5.4). The minimum density on the site is 4.3 (5.4/0.80=
43). However, due to the shape and location of the wetland and the buffer necessary to protect the
wetland, a considerable portion of the site is undevelopable as shown on the attached plans. This
application is for a 2-lot partition. As a result,this application complies with the maximum and
minimum density requirements of the R-4.5 District.
CHAPTER 18.725: ENVIIZONMENTAL PERFOItMANCE STANDARDS
18.725.020 General Provisions
A. Compliance with applicable state and federal regulations. In addition to the
regulations adopted in this chapter,each use, activity,or operation within the City
of Tigard shall comply with the applicable state and federal standards pertaining to
noise,odor and discharge of matter into the atmosphere,ground, sewer system or
stream. Regulations adopted by the State Environmental Quality Commission
pertaining to non-point source pollution control and contained in the Oregon
7
\V.DCHF5I�PROJECTS�Projects\7009\pOCSlReports�paR-2.doc
Administrative Rules shall by this reference be made a part of this chapter.
18.725.030: Performance Standards
COMMENT:
The proposed partition will comply with environmental performance standards of residential
development.
CHAPTER 18.745: LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING STANDARDS
18.745.040 Street Trees
A. Protection of existing vegetation. All development projects fronting on a public
street,private street or a private driveway more than 100 feet in length approved
after the adoption of this title shall be required to plant street trees in accordance
with the standards in Section 18.745.040 C.
COD�NT:
Street trees shall be planted in accordance with Section 18.745.040 C.
18.745.050 Buffering and Screening
A. General provisions.
2. Buffering and screening is required to reduce the impacts on adjacent uses
which are of a different type in accordance with the matrices in this chapter
(Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2). The awner of each proposed development is
responsible for the installation and effective maintenance of buffering and
screening. When different uses would be abutting one another except for
separation by a right-of-way,buffering,but not screening,shall be required
as specified in the matr'ix;
COMMENT:
The subject site is surrounded by similar uses. As a result,no buffering or screening is required.
However,buffering and screening will be implemented on the south side of the proposed access as
shown on the attached development plans(Eachibit 1)to reduce impacts on adjacent parcels to the south.
CHAPTER 18.775: SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW
COMMENT:
No alteration of the wetland is proposed as part of this application. As a result, a sensitive lands review
is not applicable to this application.
8
11LDCHFS 1�PROJECTS�Projats\7009�DOCS�Reports�part-2.doc
CHAPTER 18.790: TREE REMOVAL
COMMENT:
The attached plans include a tree inventory. Potential tree removal is identified in accordance with
Section 18.790.030.
18.790.050 Permit Applicability
A. Removal permit required. Tree removal permits shall be required only for the
removal of any tree which is located on or in a sensitive land area as detined by
Chapter 18.775. The permit for removal of a tree shall be processed as a Type I
procedure as governed by Section 18.390.030, using the following approval criteria:
COMMENT:
No trees within the wetland area are proposed to be removed as part of this application.
CHAPTER 18.795: VISUAL CLEARANCE AREAS
The proposed project complies with the visual clearance areas as shown on the attached development
plans.
CHAPTER 18.797: WATER RESOURCES (WR) OVERLAY DISTRICT
COMMENT:
The proposed site is not within a Water Resource Overlay District,therefore,this standard does not
apply.
CHAPTER 18.810: STREET AND UTILTIY STANDARDS
5. Access drives in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with approved
provisions for the turning around of lire apparatus by one of the following:
a. A circular, paved surface having a minimum turn radius measured
from center point to outside edge of 35 feet;
b. A hammerhead-configured,paved surface with each leg of the
hammerhead having a minimum depth of 40 feet and a minimum
width of 20 feet;
c. The maximum cross slope of a required turnaround is 5%.
9
\1L.DCHFS 1�PROJECTS1Projects\7009\DOCS\Reporrs�part-2.doc
COMMENT:
The development complies with the above referenced standards as shown on the attached developrnent
plans.
IV. SUMMARY and CONCLUSIONS
Based on the above findings,the applicant has demonstrated compliance with the requirements of the
relevant sections of the City of Tigard Community Development Code. Therefore,this request should be
approved.
10
\1L DCHFS 1�PROJECTS1Projects\7009\DOCS�Reports�part-2.doc
LIST OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit `A' Fineview Farm Tree Protection and Removal Plan, dated June 26, 2001
Exhibit `B' Letter from USA, dated May 15,2000
Exhibit `C' Set of 2-lot partition plan drawings
Sheet 1 of 5-Cover/ Index of Drawings
Sheet 2 of 5-Preliminary Plat
Sheet 3 of 5-Contour Map
Sheet 4 of S- Preliminary Utility Plan
Sheet 5 of 5- On-site/Off-site Analysis
Sheet 1 of 1 -Tree Preservation Plan
' Exhibit 'A'
Fineview Farm
Tree Protection & Removal Plan
Prepared for:
Phil Morford
17582 Cazdinal Drive
Lake Oswego, Oregon 97034
Prepared by:
Walter H. Knapp
Certified Silviculturrst
Certified Arborist-ISA
7615 SW Dunsmuir
Beaverton, OR 97007
Phone(503) 646-4349
Fax(503) 265-8117
E-mail:walterhknapp@att.net
June 26, 2001
Executive Summary
Thirty-nine trees are growing on the Fineview Farm site. Twenty-seven of these
trees exceed 12 inches in diameter. Of these, 6 trees will be cut due to
construction and 21 will be retained. Tree protection measures will be required
for trees neaz construction activities. No tree replacement mitigation is necessary
for this project.
Fineview Farm TPP Page 1
June 26,200!
Walter H.Knapp
Background and Site Characteristics
Grasses and shrubs currently cover much of the area encompassed by Fineview
Farm. However, there are several tree groups on the site. A grove of large
Douglas-firs (Pseudotsuga menziesii) lines the approach lane. Oregon white oaks
(Quercus garryana) are growing along the dryer aspects of the site boundary.
Oregon ash(Fraxinus latifolia) occupies transitional areas in and adjacent to
designated wetlands. In addition, there are scattered orchard trees remaining on
the interior of the property.
Tree Inventory
Species, size, and location of the trees are shown on the tree inventory map. This
information is summarized in table 1, which also shows which trees will be cut or
retained during construction.
Table 1. Tree inventory,Fineview Farm.
DBH S ecies Total All Total>12
ia. Ash Oak Fir A le Walnut Decid Trees in.
8 1 3 4
10 2 2
12 3 1 2 6
14 2 2 4 4
16 4 4 4
18 5 1 6 6
20 2 2 2
22 1 1 2 2
24 1 1 2 2
26 2 2 4 4
2g 0 0
30 1 1 1
32 0 0
34 1 1 2 2
36 0 0
Total All Trees 18 6 6 3 1 5 39
Total>12 in. 13 6 6 1 1 0 27
Cut trees>12 inches diameter indicated by bold underline
Walter H.Knapp Silviculture&Farest Management Urban Forestry
7615 SW Dunsmuir Lane Beaverton,OR 97007 Phane(S03) 646-4349 Fax(503)265-8117
Fineview Farm TPP Page 2
June 26,2001
Walter H.Knapp
Tree Species
There are no rare or unusual tree species on the site. A listing of inventoried
species is shown in table 2.
Table 2. Listing of tree species,Fineview Farm.
S ecies Common Name atin binomial
Fir ou las-fir seudotsu a menziesii
Ash Ore on ash raxinus lati olia
Oak Ore on white oak ercus a ana
Walnut En lish walnut u lans re ia
A le a le alus
Decid deciduous tree - s ecies not desi ated
Mitigation
City of Tigard Municipal Code 18.790.030 describes tree plan requirements"for
the planting, removal, and protection of trees..." The code specifies that
"retention of 75%or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in [diameter] requires
no mitigation(18.790.030.B.2.d)." As shown in table 3, 78%of the trees larger
than 12 inches is being retained.
Table 3. Mitigation calculations for Fineview Farm.
Category Number of Trees Percent
otal#trees> 12 inches: 27
etain trees> 12 inches: 21 78%
Cut trees> 12 inches: 6 22%
iti ation Cate o : o miti ation r uired. 0%
Tree Protection
Trees designated for retention that are within 30 feet of any construction activities
will need special protection measures. These include:
� Fencing.
Walter H.Knapp Silvtculture&Forest Management Urban Forestry .
761 S SW Dunsmuir Lane Beaverton,OR 97007 Phoxe(S03)646-4349 Fax(503)2658117 • �
Fineview Farm TPP Page 3
June 26,2001
Walter N.Knapp
❑ The Critical Root Zone(CRZ) of retention trees will be protected by
installation of chain link or orange construction fencing to prevent injury
to tree trunks or roots, or soil compaction. The CRZ generally coincides
with the tree dripline.
❑ The project arborisdurban forester will determine the exact location and
type of fencing needed to provide protection.
❑ Tree protection fencing will not be removed or relocated without the prior
approval of the project arborisdurban forester.
• Soil and Root Protection. If it is necessary for any equipment to access the
CRZ, a layer of gravel or other suitable mulch at least 6 inches deep will be
placed in the path of the equipment as root and soil protection. The material
will be removed at the end of construction. Tree protection fencing will be
immediately replaced after such operations are completed
• Storage of Equipment. Construction equipment will be stored in suitable
locations away from retained trees.
• Excavation.
❑ The project arboristlurban forester will provide on-site consultation during
excavation activities within the CRZ.
❑ The stripping of topsoil around retained trees will lie restricted. No fill
material(including temporary storage of spoils)will be placed within the
CRZ.
❑ Where feasible,maj or roots within the CRZ will be protected by tunneling
or other means to avoid destruction or damage. Exceptions can be made
if, in the opinion of the project arborisdurban forester, unacceptable
damage will not occur to the tree.
❑ Where soil grade changes affect the CRZ, the grade line should be
meandered wherever practicable. This will require on-site coordination to
ensure a reasonable balance between engineering, construction, and the
need for tree protection.
� Quality Assurance.The project arborisdurban forester will supervise proper
execution of this plan during construction activities that could encroach on
retai.ned trees.
Walter H. Knapp
Cerhfied Forester,SAF
Certified Arborist,ISA PN-0497
WalterH.Knapp Silviculture&ForestManagement Urban Forestry
761 S SW Dunsmuir Lane Beaverton,OR 97007 Phone(503)646-4349 Fax(503)265-8I17
� Exhibit 'B'
UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY
RECEIVED PLANNING
MEMO�vDUM P�1P,Y 1 7 2000
CITY OF TIGARD
DATE: May 15, 2000
TO: Mathew Scheidegger, City of Tigard
FROM: Julia Huffinan, USA �
l/:���
SUBJECT: Fineview Partition#1,MLP 1999-00017
On February 22, 2000 the Unified Sewerage Agency ("USA") Board of Directors adopted
USA Resolution and Order 00-7 (R&O 00-'n. R&O 00-7 applies immediately to all
development, unless the development is authorized by approval of a land use application
that was received by a land use authority on or before February 4, 2000 and was approved
or deemed complete by the land use jurisdiction on or before March 15, 2000.
According to the County Assessor's Maps, the partition is occurring on a portion of 1 S 135AA
Tax Lots 901 and 1000, which does not match the applicants submittal.
SANITARY SEWER
Each lot in the development should be provided with a means of disposal for sanitary sewer. The
means of disposal should be in accordance with Unified Sewerage Agency's Design and
Construction Standards. Engineer should verify that public sanitary sewer is available to uphill
adjacent properties, or extend service as required by R&O.
STORM SEWER
Each lot in the development should have access to public storm sewer. Engineer should verify
that public storm sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend storm service as
required by the R&O. Hydraulic and hydrological analysis of storm conveyance system is
necessary. If downstream storm conveyance does not have the capacity to convey the volume
during a 25-year, 24-hour storm event, the applicant is responsible for mitigating the flow.
WATER QUALITY
Developer should provide a water quality facility to treat the new impervious surface being
constructed as part of this development.
155 North First Avenue,Suite 270, MS 10 Phone: 503/648-8621
Hillsboro, Oregon 97124-3072 FAX:503/640-3525
May 15, 2000
Mathew Scheidegger, City of Tigard
Fineview Partition #1
Page 2
SENSITNE AREA
A "Sensitive Area" exists. Developer must preserve a corridor as described in the R&O
separating the sensitive area from the impact of development. The wetland/sensitive area shall
be identified on plans.
DIVISION OF STATE LANDS/CORPS OF ENGINEERS
A DSL/Corps of Engineers permit is required for any work in the wetlands.
i
I
� I � , � �------- LD� ,lo,� ����
-----� Exhibit 'C'
' ;--------�--1 � TL sos
i �-----------� �
I w I TL 902 � TL 905 � ' ,
, � I I
w i I I r-----------�
I � I I � TL 806 �
I
, _ _________ , �� � o a o � 0
_______
TL 100 i I �, � �'
I"O i Parcel 1 / � 80� i
i � I TL sot �� �----------� o
- ----� � / , �
� Wo
� � , , � Wo
� -�� Parce! 2 J � N �
_SW MAPLE �� �I�J� �� II��P� �"�O� J < ° M
� a -' - n
� .. y Z �
STREET r_............�.___......,_ ; l W a � � �
.�. o
—--—----1 ' r� ,oo, : `, � , .,-- ; ... _ ..... .... :__, _ DRA WINGS tl � U � Q :�
, , _ ... .,__ --
F : : : ..
i � I � �`� f• � ; ..{...: • �... ..-... : ��. ` --r.'-';1._ 1 COVER/1NDEX OF DRAWINGS
� z o � w �°
i i � TL 13�7 / �.�
� \�� � ; 1� j � .}. , : _�.. 3 CONTGUR Mqp LAT
I --------I `�`. '/ Q'\ ..-? :__ --�--�-1--? .:�..._ -�,��I. E.— 4 PRELIMINARY lI7LlTY PLAN Z t
. � ~•
i � . � L_ � �l 5 ON-SITE / OFF-SfTE ANALY5/S �
�. :� Q : ....1 �.�; ...:�::j : :,,,�,.,�,,, ,--�------ < c�
TL 100 � '.. ' Z
, � i ; ,;: P : . : : n. � : �,. �--:---- _ o Q W
0
I i TL 1002 i �O ....___ " ` .....��!- �' p r�i o
�� �/ i � : � _..�v. � �
P � °
i � �. . ' ` �-' �-i '�-�- - � ¢ F- r' a
. / . .
_.._...--
� � i / (-O /11 -' �w�ar�r � •'`o` � �........ - _ � � � F
i �- -°--
' ..:-..--...�
� � �� / � �j SITE }
�----------- � ���,�....... � � Q o
I
� ---�O�� - -__.�.// : �i � � N ~ F-
� i "- / .�::Ai�j�; � G V
P " . � � ' � � � � --�- -
I TL 1101 P� , : ��< ,�,�� � �...r...�--. �
i � I / SCALE.• f"=4p' � .`' .__..i �i� I n, 1 � ; ; �
I
_ `i . �✓/ , � j~I i ' � 1 ' �
` I �, z
�/ . . . w �
wQ
V1ClNlTY PLAN (NTS) �a
��
SI TE DATA o �
U w
� �
APPLICANT: FINEVIEW FARM, LLC PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS � ?
15500 SW JAY STREET 1430 EASTSIDE ROAO �
BEAVERTON, OREGON 97006 HOODRIVER, OREGON 97031
TELEPHONE: (503) 641-7342 TELEPHONE: (541) 386-6333 I
PROPOSAL: 2-LOT PART1T10N
ZONING: R-4.5 ' �
� �
SIZE: 0.41 ACRES �
TOPOGRAPHY: FIELD SURVEY 8Y LDC DESIGN GROUP, INC. i �
� �
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: TAX LaT 1000, TAX MAP 151-35AA 1 �
CITY OF TIGARD, OR � �
STORM &
SANITARY SEWER: CITY OF TIGARD ��"��
Design
WATER: TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT � .��roup
ELECTRIC: P.G.E. Planners
Engineers
TELEPHONE: G.T.E. Surveyors
' vao N.w.:iim mv��ce
FIRE: TUALATIN VA�LEY FIRE & RESCUE
MLL58oRO.OREGON 071N
PHONE:(SOS�l56�-1I4=
FA%:(50S)645—Sfi00
vw.ldcde,iy�.eem
7009
_ . - �
"5
-
� 1 � I ,
�
�--------------I �
� �--------- i I � �—
I � TL 904 I � w I
I I � I TL 804 � w� I _
� � I I i j � � � � - - -- -- ----
I I � � � I � ( �
I I � � � I Z �
. I w I � r---------� i O I
( � I ( �-------- -- ------{ � � TL 600 � o
I > �---- ----�—� ----------- I TL 805 � � I // �Wo
, Q � , � 1 , w � � � � ���
� �y
� _ � TL 902 � TL 905 � � � � � // � =<°n
I F— I � � � < a�Zn
-----------� � �
� � I � � r I � � /� W a�'��
I I I � I � � / ! W Z�Q�
� � I I--- � TL 8 0 6 � I � /� � p � ��m�
------
� �3�' -------- - ---� � �
TL 100 � � TL 901 TL 1000 �� � I � ��
I I � Porcel 1 / TL 800 � � � � Z �
� 50' J� 7,7s4 sq.ft. ti�� ( / � o o a 4
f i "'- �i o �------- - --y /y � ° � c
I / � o
� � '� Q �/ � /// � p `�' Q
J Q, c
- - J I � Parce! 2 _ ►- � F
------ - 45� �------------ O X �
Net: 8,222 sq.ft. I / � a x �
1APLE STREET � 88 ios' �' Gross: 10,0�4 sq.ft. � N ~ � �
_ � G �'
�
� s'� ry TL 1301 TL 590 �
--------- -, � TL 1001 �` 6' �
� � I
I � �`��� '
� . ~
' I J
` a
I 50 1 � ' �
� � �. �' a
. ?
TL 100 j � ___ � �� � W
� �---- --- �� P °=
� � � �� � � a
� � �� �� �
� j TL 1002 � �,� ------- ----- - - ----
I � j/ ��G i� I
i I �
� � 1--------- - -- �Q'�---� � a
/
I � P�� i/ I �
� I TL 1101 � � � �
I � �� i� I �
I � p� � I �
I �Q � �
I
I � i
� P�P �� i
� I � T�Desig
-------
i r----------r----- so, �� i ld/V rourn
�
� j TL 1102 I TL 1100 � TL 401 �� � s`��.�5
. � � � I i� i� TL 1200 I � »oo e.w.xnn�mw:
I I I / / I ]�0 WLLS90R0.OREOON 97`
PHONE:(SO])l50-{lt
� � fA1c:(507){a5-SSIX.
I I .�wJdcdWq�.rom
ro
' � i � /// /// � GRAPHIC SCALE � 7009
� � /
�_���_ —�
���J ���_�_����.�I������ �� ����������_��_ � _� �__�� 1� � q l� w �L M¢iO
, � / /
�------- ------T--------`-----�---- (mreer)
--- ---- --�= 7��— I
�--—————--7 �-- � 1 mch- 9a ri
� � • '/ � `�$
' i
�. . I I I i L �U'+ : � I L OV'+ j W � �------
� � ' � , +
/� i � ; ; . � �
l i�� I� i � � ' i Z �
! � \ � , � , I �
.. �1 y , : �__........------.........__; � o � ,
° � Z� �l'O^i i i i ' ---�-----�-�-----.....------i � i TL 6�
I I
W� --.........._----....-�---..L__, . i � �
� � i
� i > � � � ----.........---�--......._� TL 805 � �
i �Q� � i. :-------�---- . i � i i
�� � I �m � TL 902 �� TL 905 i ; � ; ~�
� ; � Wo
�� ....---��---_........----� � � �
�p�- . ....-�----�
-� V�� � ��� � : � " ' � , ' �ro�
i
J i � �i � I „� � TL 806 ; i ; < �z�
�� Y� _— �- .. � ' � I i �- ;o i
� (/� s r .. -.. �-��- \ ......----._.........------�-- -- ---' � I / W y�a
�. m
,: � ' � o
TL 100 _ ���'` �� 1� TL 901 � �'�. �000,��� �/� : � � � �; LEGEN D Q � ���
_ i ( � ��l r� �-- v � � Par�J 1 � '� TL 800 � 1 ' � -"'��a---- ExisnNC �� CONTOUR
L _ _ i �
_ i` / -;- /� i\ � � �� � �/�/ ; � ✓ �--180!— EXISTiNG 5' CONTOUR
1 � .✓ � ......------j �
_-�� ------
� �; � / �� � /� � / i �� � SURFACE FLOW Z
� / o
�, i ' `/
` i r� T � / / i �I \ � �� � � J �/ � ��1/ /� � E7cIS11NG DECIDUOUS TREES � O v¢i �
/ Porc�l 2 � , _
�J ^� ,., � � . o
----------------- � r.i— �— �- —__��'' ( � ' �� ��� �----------
� o
-�- --' _ /� _, 1 � �'r' --� � r� �� '� EXISTING EVREGREEN TREES � N a
�� `_ / I/ �� / ///� Q
MAPLE STREET � � � � � � ....----..._..... . ��'..��_�..�__._�..�._._��..���'
o �,
- - —� .��.:. �������.: :;�v'�'. —f ,� � ��� —� _ _ / I ,�\ o x � �
,,..
. :
.
� / - �+'£. r �Si,: � � J
.. :.
�..
` �•---- .........-'�''�--........�_ � ' � / i� a
:.��:.
:.,., :z:w:�.:, ,r'4" � ��� / °
... �...�� � / T��1� _ �/ / J � — � ��) , N ~ � �
------------- ��-i ��t�l��, T� 100} / ;��' . / g0 �/ / � " '/ G
I i i /J � . / /� , ,/ / //�
�
J —+- 1��/ i ' / ' ( � / ' � � / /
i —�t � � . � ' i� . � �� J�
� � � � / i�� _�_ -�/ �� �/ / � /
f- -- -�j- � / � _ _ I `: � �` /� •'/ � / �
� I � - - � :� � ,// // / � a
- - L �� � ( - - / � / �J � �
TL 100 � �-C_ : � — -��-�----1 � i � � � -� �
........._----
-----� � � i i � ' � / w\P =
��� // i �� ' ' � � � � i.i i� /� i �� V` °
�� I � � � � —� � �/ ' � ' i �/ %/ O� U
—� : �� i
� � (^ 'r� � � f ; i� � J�� ��� 5�' � '`
------- � -
;------------- �
����� � �Jii TL 1002 � — _ —: � ,� ��:� _ � �� �� % �` ,. �
r � / l / � yi �G , � .
� �; ��,�� � �� '" _ = _ J��, �� - - - � '� �'�r� � �,� � �
� ,�I�✓ � i...._.._�-_---�----�--E-�........----_............, / � ' � i � , �
� i�;�� � �...----.........---- , ✓ �<��-_�OP--__��. � :
� i�\ ��� i ' � /�%��� P� � ,• a
1� � i TL 11d1 �\- _ J ��� lo� .' ,
� � � i ; .��� �� �,' : �
i � � � i � � � , . �
I ' i
i � .
; I \�j i ?� ii7��Q' ,,'� i �
� ` �
; '� �J 1..-- ----�----.......---� .. ---..........------....---. ;
----....._.^_........ .... _
• �` / : �
� I I � � �� // ��� �
1 �/ �
i �� I � i TL 1102 � TL 1100 � 401 ,' ; '���� D��gA
. % �
' I � '� '� 1200 ' ;.��
� �� � . � � TL G
Planners
I�� 1V � J � . '�• �� � � En cxers
I I I � � �� �•`� ��� j � Swvieyars
i , � I t i /� i = swo n.w.2nm rexn�cc
Y� 1/ � 7 � ; ���` i� � ------ "
wuseano.ateoa 9�ixs
PMONE:(36])65! �142
,:. ___�`_ ____ L___________
_________�_____�_�___�—_ PA%:(SOJ)615 5500
--�-------J I �------------- " -- —> i ....w�a«W�.�
� _______ ; � GRAPHIC SCALE
,- / � d q:
-�..r •� --r-----------------------T------ ,� 7009
------------------r-------------f�-----
----- . m ,. e m
----------------� r---- :• . � � � .�,.o
, (nr r¢-r) �
i amn- ao a
'S
' I ' j � I 1 I I I
I
� EXISTING � � 1 � I 1 � I
-�I CURB � �
� I I � ------� I r---'-------------------� I-- I I
I I
i (TYP. i i-------- � I I 1 l.0 �
� i , � TL 904 � � � TL fiO4 � W � LEGENO
�-------
—J � �+--L EXISTING j I I � � I
� � EDGE OF I � � � �
' � j PAVEMENT 1 I I I � � `�s^—�'• cwrnNO w�e►rae t sr«a g�
� I I I � m-�-� vnoaosm Muuat r sraw�n
i � i (TYP.) � � 1 I Z �
" oasrN��in r sTanu sEV�crs
...........,=:.............•
..:
� ---- � � �
� j I �� � �----------- � � (n I � l,e*P, cnrnNC rne Nronu+r
��] i —i , �----------------------� � � TL 60 � PROPOSm FlRE MTDMNT
� Z `'�``I � l I �LI � •--°°°--xv'°........_ [wrnec w�mn u+c �-�o
I �ll -EXISTJN6--------- I
L--� ' TL 805
I � � �UTILITY � -------------1 I � � aaarosmw��rtu� v wo°
�------
EXISTING STORM � �� � POIE � � � � � f ..............fw............ N1URE WATER UNE J v�i°�
D R A I N L I N E (T l'P.) �6 � � �T�•� � � � I —i v°• E 7 0 5 T N C V A L V E k B O% � a�n
�; �� 4i TL 9 0 2 , TL 9 0 5 � , � � �- PROPOS[0 V�U.E�c BO% � 3 0;
r -----------------
I� O � hi'}�' j � � � (� I ---����- nasnnc RmuaR W N��
I�. �N � I � � I � � � —a— Pnorosto re�uaR � S $�',�
I; � � I �
�: ' � � � ' TL 806 ; i ,' —. vnoPOSCO e�owo� � � ^m�°n�
EXISTING SANITARY —����� � I
• ________� ___� � I / -u WAlERSERNCE
SEWER �INE (TYP.) I ; � �------ �� --------------- � I � i� --0O ClEANWT
T L 1 0 0 i;,,�, ; �.4ti i TL 901 TL 1000 / i i i � �i `i:.� °""TM P°�
��;�R;}-A�i � Porcel 1 ' ' � ---
� � TL 800 I / -�.'}-__._.._..i'• PROPNOSEU YNMIHOIE k SENER Q C'7
(.� � �: � / � �� � � �{� Z O
EXI5TING WALK (TYP.) j' ' '`�'` � / � O p ¢ w
� : I ,' � �
�� � � / �----
_____________� � � M O
r _I / / �/ � � I
I� I w� �' /�/ i/ � � N C�
I: � / a
__ "� � ' -�Parcel 2 i ��---------- o X � ti
--------------- '� : � �
: i � � /
, G`, � V/ i Q Q O
.. • I �/ N ~ ~
SW MAPLE STREET ,�, ;�:�; .-� ------------------�-�---�
_ _ , ------------- - �
;;r ai ; i i�
�
, i,�
^ ----
------------ -�.
: �
�•:��- : ; TL 1301 �...,. �'
` `.` TL 1001 ' �•� ' BUFFER• .. .
--- � : i i i , .� r
_.._
----------- �F; � ,. -
.......
--- �F; . �:. �
� j s�H� I i .• `� � j� . . r � .i. �
I. I I � I I` `` ``� /, . .� .f 1 ��.\ %�
I; .., I I � ��� `�` . . . � � , � �.Z
�: y `Jk. � I ( �\ �� /,` ++ � •� + � "� ��' � � 1 � � J
�i � 15' W10E SANITARY� �� �� 15' NtOE STORM •� �:' d i ¢a
�i � SEN£R EASEMENT � �� �� �`�SEN4t EASENENT �� ��;���,� ,� .. . � . v . ! � Z
Iv' ` I � � .� �.� � . . � . � . V. . . � + .. J
� / :' I i� � �
. t ♦ .�.r .. .�"".7. / W J
I ♦ '
I: !'., L--------------�------� I � �♦ . .. . .. . 'r � / �►_
TL 100 �: :' ' �`, • ;; .. .. .. " . :'� i � a
I `;1 -----r —� �� �� :� + � i� j � �
� F---------- , , � � �, µ� V � y , � -� , P
�-' � 10'N10E SANITARY� I �� � ',' �j i/"��' � � �
. �.� � I � SEWER EASEMIENT i RIP-RAP ,�W .r . ,r .. � � Y
�: .I I � ��/��lr� i��`��YrvyY��I` v �!' • 'i/ O� n
I: , I:. � i' : . . . . � '`
�. �..:.i � �
,� %' . _ . i
i: � � TL 1002 i �"-�. .. . . . . --------------------
� � .:� . . . . -..,�' i G`r �'I
�. I I � / : . � � . � .i� �� \ � I
I.., : I I / / I
�; � � . . + �...�..- ,/ O� / I � I
� �� ::� . . . �:
{� , � I / � � � I
� �i�� �'�----------------�--------�'-----1=—=—�— .. '�� � -- �
a
, �P-----� �
� � �
; ; � ; ; / ,'
r� ; � i`� ,' �� ,' i �
�; ; � � � � P . , �
� .� i i TL 1101 i`� ��• � �i i
i; � i . �� �. i �
�; �` : i �� `�� �' � i �
��= : I i �` . \ ,� �� �, i
i: i , �
i� I i i i` .� ` �� `,, ��� � .:<:r:>:;�:<--
� .� � ` y
� , .: :.:.
i � ------i�, `�,�� � / , i f.>: :.FGroiun
P � >:.
�----------- -------- � ���
------r-
---
.. .
I. ' I I . � / � ""ar'r.c"" L
I? ? � � I.e / I
Etlglneers
�' v� � TL 1102 i TL 1100 i� TL 401 i' � Surveyors
I: ,' �"
1: � I � � � � � z a�oa raw.znm�cwu�s
I I ' � � TL 1200 i A 1tl11$BOR0.�EWp 9714s
�� I I �� i� � = vxa+�(sw)6sse-ssoo
II . � � i� i� � .w��.�
�I ` I I EXISTING l i� ♦� � a..d
� =�` j� �� .�FIRE HYDRANT � i� �� � 7009
� � � Yt.l i , �� i � GRAPHIC SCALE
r- � � I I � .a,.a
�""' ( � <--------------------------------�--------- „
� -J L-----------------L--------�' / a u x « m �
---�------------ � /
/ � .
�•�� -,",------- fT-__ -ry-'__.---------------------T------ ( Oi!'FI�:T)
_-____-_-___
_____
____--�_
___-____7 �--___..._-_ / � � � � 11ach- 90 !t a
, __-_--__ / / / � ' cJ
o°
r �
� —
� ""-------.........�.__.__.......-'.--
. ...._....---...............----'-•'-'-., ..
� SW LOCUST STREET
---�- - - - -
— - �� - - .... .._�.___
I ------.,.........----� --�
; _...... - ---�- --
... .. ... r. --�-- �
_.... __....., :
-- _
� • �----� i i r_ �. i � �o.: '..`
� i 4�: ' � ��• r•_ s��z •
T�.. ;'::S� � �[,y : I I .. � : • i �I O
� � � � � I �� LEGEND
' ' �osn+c � i � ; ` ►- � I
: '. � ? : �
. : ' � ; W�
• ' curse :
� ....--•-----° .
� � ���� � ;""" ' / 3 i ' W /� O SOIL CLASSIfICAT10N NUMBER � y O1
I t � I � lt :;05 : � ; � ':1. 805 � .._...............��------- }o a
� I
� , ----- �--=tz�snNC � • `�� '� � �.... � � �
. . � ; m�a� � '. !� / +. Z � � SOIL SEPERATtON LINE � 3 0�
: : ;, �j I : (ttr.) �! � � : Q . W N��
: : � �........_----°-� ; .; �� I
: , : Q I I� / ! � . .._-- -.... ..._----� ' I� -- —�9O� EXISTING 1D CONTOUR ^ ..
/ .
f '
' w 1
---=------- � i / -
' swsrr+c••�-- .. .....; : � PG� � ' '/, �,. m
, ,„-, l , � W o a�
1;:S� �unun ' � 1 l�i.. � ' Z u�W�n
� •-------.........----�
°�TMa 5T0�" �~•I PO� � \ 1 J �1 • I �', L ORAINAGE FLOW DIRECTION
pGN WE(T9.� :�O: . ITYV. . T�_ ....5 ., / '7
.�n ;
',� � '. IL '�U"1 �J I � r _._..--------. i
� `
� � � � �- � � / ! ' e EXISTING OECIDUOUS TREE
� � / :(1l ' � : _ �'l FGu •
� 1 oasn+o w+ruir ----- I ......___.....�.....__ ' ` I �� ;�', � Z O < �
.,� .
scv�re urt(�J :I �--- -� � : � I � O w
'LQ�-- � � � ii. �:i0 �. v `. �T, � � � � � • '� EXISTING EVERGREEN TREE F- O� �.`�j o
�r, e MWSE �- � I`.. :'{i'� _ ./�Ci I ' : . � I
- ; ' . . , :� F ;
i �
oasTwc wwc(TVr.) ': a��c�ci� � �.... ____.. � �'
� ' � o
; � ..,, : Q F- N �
i � ' .. � , ; a
j � �i ��- r:._ �.Y- e ,��- -, •-�-..... .. .
; ;
, � r" � �
i � � � � '
-�• --........----._... . , �. . . . .__... .___..............•------;
F ¢ F
� I • �
SW MAPLE � ;.,'�"�_° � oas�w,u�c�w.�/L_J � ; O ~ � �
— - '�'� : -> U
STREET .� ; I I� ���--: e —� e � P� r_ �ao �
--......... a� (�
...___�.....; , r�:.._^ . � : �
E175T. � I ElOST. J.�.�. =-` �`
I� I NWSE J BUIDWG .`. . .� ��.1
� L^ � � (TO BE RQIOVEO) . . i' } `� V)
-� v �E+. �'• . . I'.r : VI
` i - � � e •:' .`�': . a.v : J
r � ?l. �:r.: ,�..�,• •J O � a
��P ,:. ��:; ;; �� �'� �°���� '•� .!-' � � P � Z
/ � �;�� � .. �r,U1 •% �:� Q-� I �w--
. .
.,.
,. r,
� �r .: ' : � g ,�-�.•.�'�,•.'� P�. _
.. � r�: N
.. .
. .
.. .,
.. . . .-
� _w I ., : I . ¢nmNO - ----........_.__.......-----.......-- --.._------... �
� r � fl'P� � � •�r-• ..J/ (�QQ- � .i O
/ �' 1 ;I :.� I ��.......------_.... '- ......_ a? � �
r,
/� 22 �' `� � I � ' ; �� ., : �
O "I I y.„� �:, g P�P : �
o// � � ' I � 22 -` �"�, � � o
V :' � i -_ .:� : ;
'�°' ,� ;: � ; � __..........--- �
.1 .._..........-�---.....
..__ . wonn�
� � ;�� � � ' � . . � �
� . �rt ��r,: � .. �ico + � `
� �I '�I ! � i� 1 •�GC I
�' � �
�il :.II : : .�� ' �--........ � � �� �
„ � . . : :
.F'
� '^ , ---- ...--------..... - -
� Q�: I _____
� � i.....---�� �� ......------_.......
..._....._----�= � ........-----�� � i
----......------...........- ---� . , � sov+R �
w ....--- .....
�---�-- ...... ;
__.. .....-�--------
--.....�;,�......... . ....
..........__ ...........-----> ,
...--�-...---------_. .
�� �� � i � � GRAPHIC SCALE �
`� 3203 � ; . ,1 ,��;
� ,�� ,�� :::1:: :�. ,' � TL 3SC0 � '.L 3'::� m . n w ,00 �oo
"��� � ' � � '� : I
i' � i - i' ,� . •><>:.:,.:.
/ \ �=' �% �� 3�::2 j I (nt e�s'1
� 320C• ' / �c•�� i�' � I � t focn- so n
�,. /� F �Deslgn ;
. �� i , I . `i�����'�Gr�
� ' ' / '` � ' ,
� � , i i . .::<:> �
`` ,`\ /� /�, / / .�,. \ ', I ` . _
, �`, � - � . � i E l�ne�ets
' �v � � �' 'o� � � � SOIL LEGEND s"�'�S
♦ • � ��0 �� •.. saoa N.w.snn�muwcc
HLLSBIXtO,OREOON 9T12�
SOII. DESCRIPTION X SLOPE LIMITING DEPTH TO SEASONA�/APPARENT DEPTH TO �EPTH TO rxor+�csw).ss-aa:
npE FEATURES WATER TABLE BEDROCK FRAGIPAN '��«0��
" 1 ALOHA SILT LOAU 0-39. WATER 1.5-2,0 ft. PERCHED > 60 in. NONE LISTEO °"°�
7009
22 HUBERLY SILT LOAM 0-37. WATER 0-1.5 ft. PERCHED > EO in. NONE LI57ED `�p
SOURCE ME1R0�5 RUS UTE DATABASE HNO THE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE SqL SURVEY OF WASHINGTON CWNTY, JUIY, 198T. �
�
`�5
� I
� � I � t�x�oT
T�x�or
I � . yQZ 903 TAX LOT
� � � ' 805
I I I
�. -.-`- PI-24
_ � , � , I r- - - - - — _ � ° I
. , _ _ _ _ �
� i � i ._i �,. .. , r______i�— �� OAN-11 � i iAX LOT ' �W
N I I � I � j I .uRE-te a� , ��
� I 1 I ;� � L i I �� I
� I �.; :.. I ;.I �, �
wi1 .. � I � � � � --- ------- N
' -- ------�
s �..; _ I -I, ,.� -. L-------� �--- PL-e , � n
L��-
. � .�� ': 1 . OEC-10 � � W m
� 1 i � 99-17-P1 _ W o
� I r�x�or I u � ��co
i ; I . 901 L-__- . li t O N
Y
� �.) . 1 ,i-__ _-__ `J AP-B — _ TA800T 3#O'1
i :I , ; � U r — — ., � 5���
�� i
j 'i . i 0 I I � � zgao
r- '1 I S+ . _ (� L � ta.�min
�_��i1 : W � I I x�C7- ��;•.>C�.=i=x_�C::Y ._ .� � .
/ Z � r a
; � , `�' �� �_':__-_�� .._�- -�...T---'r---- � 99-17-P2 � � oec-iz
i � � --- -1� � — — -� �2f ¢
SW AIMIELEAF � � . . Q � i I �i V�-I�� �Q
� SIREET_ __ -i , .._ _ '� .I - ' �. � fl-26 I ASH-T4 � I'�
(NOT CONSTRUCIED) / � �� :'�� �-31 --���i `� ��< OAK-8/12/12/14 0 30
� � O ,I _ ' � � � ����,R�FI-26 HA_ ' OAK- / �H_ ASH-
262 W�� w
. / .•____ ._Y��___-- - _-. - 8 2 1B �� .
I � �O
� . � ��— U B�-_��—n -n--�tYx- o— kzo ,ri zo -
� �: ' � � { .':.� �� � - -- --—� � Ch p� �Cj �
� ��,� -- --�--1 � �, �I
f N 1 . � � � I � �� A5�1-16/3 � �� M�
' I I ___ ___-, .\ ; � � ���, ASH-18I14 Q.
___
� � \ ' _._ _ _ e -� �Z �
t � � 3z f__ � � - - s - ,:�� 99-18-Pt � ' � Z O
� -------
I � � � 1 i . '� ��� � � " � W � U O F p t�
� f i � '� I � I � � y y. � � ,�� ASN-14/iB/18 J�F �O
I � . I I I I � ..���\` / • �-m��' `- F
� � I --- ' J V , �� � ��, ��Q� ��
� � _ � , �
� � C_ I �..`�^ � Y Y � •
� � � l_�__ - L----� 1 � i ��t�'. i � . ,� i t d F
I � � ux Lor � i .
2 � � . I I 1001 i .,�-�l � `. \ . W W� W J� �`� u . J Z
U �
y� � � ; . I I DEC-?8 tlf���� AP-22 � y a .. r a � W . a
� I I � .. - '_--__ I I � � � `'`\�' . . . . . . . , m ' J .....
� i � ." I f-__ � I I i `\\\`.. `�`., � / �: d ,`,.. L
W I L-------� F-__N ��� . . ,. .� . . .�..- - y . Z ,
� � � �
� � . I I ------------------------------ i � ` ��O � � .�
� �L �4 W �L �L � O
LJ 1 � I f.1__-� _-_—�_'_ '__J . `\ /.��.� ` � I .� a .r W y v y `/'� /L WI.SH-1� �SM-la�� ; .
99-18-P2 �.� c� . „ W „ y i �„ � � vWi
-, � ��;: . O i ns��-io/s w
- �_1z :�z:;�-. W P� � . � .� ,-� � �
oe�o) _ �' ��/`(,�(�, � � TRACT °A". �. �� / � y1Q' � a
I _ � '.l.'+ W V � i � . y ASN-34 ` F .W
�---- / 0� � la�
� �. �� y y u W W u G�� � �
ASH-16
TAX LOT �'� w v �� w � '�" ��� �
1002 . � � � ,� I� � � Q �
.� � a . .. �OP
�' � � .. I
.
. . y � ., M� ��� � e
/ i � W� O��O �" �
— �- i P�� � �
t� P� LEGEND �� �
` �m
y �` OAK-2a i!0?I�
� ��� EVERGREEN TREE TO REMAIN ��
� na�•
�
= TAX LOT � � �� EVERGREEN TREE TO BE REMOVED
iioi
o�-� � � �'� ��'=� Gro�un
� . DECIDUOUS TREE TO REMAIN
:a q +o � .o �, " Inc.
� � �
Planners
r- u^�E �� ` 20� , " J \ �� DECfDUOUS TREE TO BE REMOVED Surve ors
J.wo rtw.z�1M m!N�CE
HRLSBMO.diEGON%17/
l TRF.F. PRESERVATION PLAN ___ ^��'Q�"°-'_'�
- _ $CALE' i• � 70' _ . _"--—'-----'_"_... . a � ASH-12�3 i�U+(��cSSOo
�' (DEAD)
.. �� .qa rw.:
7�09
p1EET N0.
�: TAX LOT t���T ASH-30 ,(�
1102
II
U
CITY OF TIGARD CASEFILFS MLP1999-00017 dc MLP1999-00018 �i
.�
8/9/2004
- ���� Conditions Associated With 9:31:40AM
T I D E M A R K Case#: MLP2003-OO011
COMPUTEF SYSTEMS, INC.
Condition Status Updated
Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Date By
1 TAX LOT 906 ACCESS DR. SCREENING None Met MAS 4/13/2004 MAS
1. Submit a plan showing proper screening of the access drive from tax lot 906 according to Section 18.745.040 of the
Tigard Development Code.
1 RECORD ACCESS&MAiNT. AGREEMENT None Met MAS 8/9/2004 MAS
2. Record access and maintenance agreements for the proposed parcels and submit a signed copy to the City.
1 STREET TREE PLAN FOR ACCESS DRIVE None Met MAS 7/14/2004 MAS
3. Submit a plan showing the proposed access drive with street trees planted in accordance with Section 18.745.040.C.
1 TREE PLAN OR ALL TREES ON-SITE None Met MAS 12/15/2003 MAS
4. Provide a tree plan indicating the size,removal,mitigation and protection of all trees located on the site.
1 PFI PERMIT REQUIRED None Met 4/12/2004 KSM 4/12/2004 KSM
5. Prior to commencing onsite improvements,a Public Facility Improvement(PFI)permit is required for this project to
cover the sewer tap and construction and any other work in the public right-of-way. Six(6)sets of detailed public
improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to
any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public
Facility Improvement(PFI)permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards,which
are available at City Hall and the City's web page(www.ci.tigard.or.us).
1 PFI PERMIT FINANCIAL ASSURANCE None Met 4/12/2004 KSM 4/12/2004 KSM
6. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name,address and telephone number of the individual or
corporate entity who will be designated as the"Permittee",and who will provide the financial assurance for the public
improvements. For example,specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership,LLC,etc. Also specify the state
within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide
accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents.
1 PRIVATE STREET SIDEWALKS None Met 6/25/2004 KSM 6/25/2004 KSM
7. Prior to final plat approval the applicant shall construct sidewalks along at least one side of the private street.
1 90TH AVENUE RESTRICTIVE COVENANT None Met 8/4/2004 KSM 8/4/2004 ST
9. The applicant shall execute a Restrictive Covenant whereby they agree to complete or participate in the future
improvements of SW 90th Avenue adjacent to the subject property,when any of the following events occur:
A. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for by the formation of a Local
Improvement District,
B. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for in whole or in part by the City or other
public agency,
C. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be constructed by a third party and involves the sharing of
design and/or construction expenses by the third party owner(s)of property in addition to the subject property,or
D. when construction of the improvements is deemed to be appropriate by the City Engineer in conjunction with
construction of improvements by others adjacent to the subject site.
1 PAY ADDRESSING FEE None Met 6/24/2004 ST 6/24/2004 PLN
8. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$60.00. (STAFF CONTACT:
Shirley Treat, Engineering).
1 90TH AVENUE ROW DEDICATION None Met 8/4/2004 KSM 8/4/2004 ST
10. The final plat shall show the dedication of ROW on 90th Avenue to provide 27 feet from centerline.
1 PRVT.ST.MAINT- F-PLAT STATEMENT None NOT MET KSM 7/30/2004 ST
1 l. The applicant shall cause a statement to be placed on the final plat to indicate that the proposed private street(s)will
be jointly owned and maintained by the private property owners who abut and take access from it(them).
Page 1 Of 3 CaseConditions..rpt
�
, �� ���o��o���,,Oregon 2004-091368
� • 1004 11:39:49 AM
' ' Dti Cnt�1 8dt�21 RECORD81
515.00 56.00 ti 1.00•Total�S32.00
RETURN RECORDED DOCUMENT TO:
Matthew Harrell
CITY OF TIGARD 00632773200400913680030036
I,J�rty H�n�on,�Inctor oi A�t�tsmmt�nd T�xatlon
�nd Ex-Olflclo Coun Cl�rk far Wuhln ton Coun ^t
13125 SW Hall Blvd. o..00�,do h�nby urtly th�t th�wlthln Inttrum�nt oi 1��`�
TIgRIY�,OR 97223 wrldnp wu nalv�d�nd neond�d In th�book aT ��, , ,�'
ncord�of�dd eounty. '{„,,� �, ���
t1.v.�
File No. �•rry�.H.n.on,Dlnctor �p��mmt�nd Tuntlon,�D, ,���
Ex-0fflelo County Cl�r1c
NO CHANGE IN TAX STATEMENT
ACCESS EASEMENT AND
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
FOR MOTOR VEHICLE DRIVEWAY ON
ADJOIlVING PARCELS RESIDENTIAL USE spa�e aaovefor Washington CountyRecording information
THIS PERPETCTAL EASEMENT, made and entered into on this August 6�'�,2004 between Fineview Farm,
L.L.C.hereinafter called the first party,and Pacific Crest Partners,Inc.hereinafter called the second party,
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, the first patty is the ovmer in fee simple of the following described property in the City of Tigard,
County of Washington,State of Oregon,to wit:
That tract of land described in Document No.2001U38127,Washington County deed records,situated in the NE 1/4 of the
NE 1/4 of section 35, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, Willamette meridian, City of Tigard, County of Washington,
State of Oregon, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the inirial point, a 3/4 iron pipe found at the
intersection of the east right of way line of SW 90th avenue with the centerline of vacated SW Mapleleaf street and
bearing N 00°35'08"W, 325.07 feet from a found 3/4" iron pipe mazking the southwest corner of block 19, "Town of
Metzger"; thence along the southerly boundary line of that tract of land described in Document No. 2001038128,
Washington County deed records the following courses:N 89°28'00"E, 105.29 feet to a found 5/8"iron rod,S 53°33'49"
E,57.62 feet to a found 5/8"iron rod,N 79°23'04"E,60.89 feet to a found 5/8"iron rod and N 30°03'48"E,27.87 feet to
the southwest comer of that tract of land described in Document No. 87011579,Washington County deed records;thence
along the south line of said�act described in Document No. 87011579,N 89°28'00"E,237.31 feet to a found 5/8" iron
rod, a point of curvature on the northwesterly line of that tract described in 2000005290, Wastungton County deed
records;thence along said northwesterly line and continuing along the northwesterly line of that tract of land described in
Document No. 81005099, Washington County deed records, 353.91 feet along the arc of a 1885.08 foot radius curve
concave to the northwest through a central angle of 10°45'25",the chord of which bears S 41°35'S7"W,353.39 feet to a
point on the east line of that tract of land described in Document No.96003523;thence along said east line and continuing
along the east line of that tract of land described in book 745 at page 184,Washington County deed records,N 00°35'08"
W, 97.05 feet to a found'/," iron pipe; thence along the north line of said tract descnbed in book 745 at page 184, S
89°28'00" W, 125.23 feet to a found 5/8" iron rod at the southeast comer of that tract of land described in 83023187,
Washington County deed records; thence along the east line of said tract described in Document No. 83023187 and
continuing along the East line of that tract of land described in Document No. 2001048639, Washington County deed
records N 00°35'08" W, 150.02 feet to a found 5/8" iron rod; thence along the north line of said tract described in
Document No.2001048639,S 89°28'00"W, 100.23 feet to a found 5/8"iron rod on the East right of way line of SW 90th
Avenue;thence along said east right of way line N 00°35'08"W, 15.00 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 52,496
square feet
and the second is the owner in fee sitnple of the following described real property in said City,County, and State,
to wit:
That tract of land described in Document No.2001038128,Washington County deed records,situated in the NE 1/4 of the
NE 1/4 of section 35, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, Willamette meridian, City of Tigard, County of Washington,
State of Oregon,being more particularly described as follows: beginning at the initial point, a 3/4 iron pipe found at the
Page 1 of 3
1:1ENGIPUB-FORMSUNTAGCO.DOT
�'
' • • II I I I II I I�I I'��I�I�I'���I���
• 2004-91388
intersection of the east right of way line of SW 90th avenue with the centeriine of vacated SW Mapleleaf sireet and
bearing N 00° 35'08" W, 325.07 feet from a found 3/4" iron pipe marking the SW corner of block 19, "Town of
Metzger"; thence along the east right of way line of SW 90th avenue N 00°35'08"W, 15.00 feet to a found 5/8"iron rod,
thence leaving said right of way line, along the south and east lines of that tract of land described in Document No.
97058637, Washington County deed records the following courses:N 89°28'00"E,88.24 feet to a found 5/8"iron rod&
N 00°35'08"W,85.00 feet to a found brass screw on the soutl�line of that tract of land described as Parcel I in Document
Na.2000072550, Washington County deed records; thence along said south line and continuing along the south line of
that tract of land described as Parcel II in Document No.2000072550,Washington County deed records,N 89°28'00"E,
13722 feet to a point on t6e west line of that tract of land described in Document No. 96078241, Washington County
deed records;thence along said west line and continuing along the west line of that tract of land described in Document
No. 87011579,Washington County deed records S 00°35'08"E, 100.00 feet to a point on the northerly boundary line of
that tract of land described in Document No.2001038127, Washington County deed records;thence along said northerly
boundary the following courses: S 30°03'48" W, 27.87 feet to a found 5/8" iron rod, S 79°23'04" W, 60.89 feet, N
53°33'49"W, 57.62 feet to a found 5/8"iron rod and S 89°28'00"W, 105.29 feet to the point of beginning. Containing
17,772 square feet
and said two parcels of real estate adjoin each other;
WHEREAS, the parties desire to grant to each other an easement and right to use the described motor vehicle
driveway now or to be constructed along and upon a portion of both of the parcels in conjunction with any lawful
use.
NOW,THEREFORE, in consideration of each party's granting to the other an easement hereinafter described,and
other valuable consideration each to the other in hand paid,the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged:
FIRST: First party conveys to second party a perpetual easement for motor vehicle driveway purposes to use in
conjunction with any lawful use along and upon that portion of first party's property described as follows,to wit:
A tract of land situated in the Northeast 1/4 of Secrion 35, Township 1 3outh,Range I West of the Willamette Meridian,
County of Washington,State of Oregon,being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a 3/4 'von pipe found
at the intersection of the east right of way line of SW 90th Avenue with the centerline of vacated SW Mapleleaf Street and
bearing N 00°35'08"W,325.07 feet from a'/."iron pipe marking the SW comer of Block 19,"Town of Metzger";thence
along the Southerly boundary line of that tract of land described in Document No. 2001038128, N89°28'00"E, 105.29
feet; thence S 53°33'49"E,34.96 feet; thence leaving said boundary line,S32°49'41"W, 15.05 feet; thence S 89°24'S2'
W,24.69 feet to a point on the East boundary of that h�act of land described in Document No.2001048639;thence along
said boundary line,N00°35'08"W, 18.62 feet; thence S 89°28'00"W, 100.23 feet a point on the east right of way line of
SW 90th Avenue;thence along the east right of way line of SW 90th Avenue,25.00 feet distant from the centerline of
said SW 90th Avenue,N 00°35'08"W, 15.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 0.05 Acres—2,266 sq.ft.
SEC4ND: Second party conveys to the fust party a perpetual easement for motor vehicle purposes for use in
conjunction with any lawful use along and upon that portion of second party's property described as follows, to
wit:
A tract of land situated in the Northeast 1/4 of Secrion 35,Township 1 South,Range 1 VJest of the Willamette Meridian,
County of Washington,State of Oregon,being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a 3/4 iron pipe found
at the intersection of the East right of way line of SW 90th Avenue with the centerline of vacated SW Mapleleaf Street
and bearing N 00°35'08" W, 325.07 feet from a'/." iron pipe marking the SW comer of Block 19, "Town of Metzge�';
thence along the east right of way line of SW 90th Avenue,25.00 feet distant from the centerline of said SW 90 Avenue,
N 00°35'08"W, 15.00 feet; thence leaving said right of way line, along the South line of that tract of land described in
Document No.97058637 and the Easterly pmjection thereof,N89°28'00"E, 133.24 feet;thence S 00°32'00"E,36.03 feet
to a point on the Northerly boundary line of that tract of land described in Document No.2001038127;thence along said
Northerly boundary N 53°33'49"W,34.96 feet;thence S 89°28'00"W, 10529 feet to the Point of Beg'tnning. Containing
0.05 Acres—2,292 sq.ft.
THIRB: It is mutually agreed that each party may use in common with the odier party, l.he whoie of said motor
vehicle driveway,including that portion thereof situated on the property of the other pariy for ingress and egress of
motor vehicle,pedestrians,and uses incidental to any lawful use of the property.
Page 2 of 3
I:1EN(APUB-FORMSVNTAC-CO.DOT
�
� ` ` ' IIIIIIII IIIIIIIII I IIIIIII III
� ' 2004-91368
FOURTH: This agreement should bind and inure to the benefit of, as the circumstance may require, not only the
immediate parties hereto, but also to their respective heirs, executors, administrators, and successors in interest as
well.
FIFT'H: The maintenance shall be a shared responsibility of the parties and each of the parties shall share the cost
of maintaining the easement. The obligation to shaze maintenance costs shall begin when the driveway is
completed.
SIXTH: In construing the foregoing agreement, the plural sha(1 mean and include the singular whenever the
conte�ct so requires.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I hereunto set my hand on this �� day of August,2004.
Fineview Farm,L.L.C. ` �� �E�---
Name of Company Signature
1430 Eastside Road,Hood River,OR 97031 Member
Address Title
STATE OF OREGON )
)ss.
County of Washington )
��
This instrument was acknowledged before me on August �or,2004 by Daniel J.Boyden as
Member of Fineview Farm,L.L.C.
OFFICIAL SEAL
KkREN A.DANSON Notary's Signature
NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON
COMMISSION N0.341375 My Commission Expires: % ���-a��S
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JAN,20,2005
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I hereunto set my hand on this �� day of August,2004.
Pacific Crest Partners,Inc � ��' •�C�-
Name of Corporation Signature
1430 Eastside Road,Hood River,OR 97031 President
Address Title
STATE OF OREGON )
)ss.
County of Washington )
This instrument was acknowledged before me on August �, 2004 by Daniel J. Boyden as President of
Pacific Crest Partners,Inc.
G ��s-�
OFFtCIAL SEAL Notary's Si�nature
KA�iEN A.DANSON
NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON My Commission Expires: � "� C� ��cl GS
COMMISSION N0.341375
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JAN.20,2005
Page 3 of 3
L�ENGWIB-FORMSVNTAGCO.DOT
CITY OF TIGARD 6/24/2004
13125 SW Hall Blvd. 12:04:22PM
-� Tigard,Oregon 97223
(503) 639-4171
Receipt #: 27200400000000002737
Date: 06/24/2004
Line Items:
Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid
MLP2003-OO011 [UNGRND] Fee Lieu Underground 230-0000-445003 412.50
Line Item Total: $412.50
Payments:
Method Payer User ID Acct/Check Approval No. How Received Amount Paid
CreditCard DAN BOYDEN KJP 866871 In Person 412.50
Payment Total: $412.50
Page 1 of 1 cReceipt.rpt
�. � . �� . �::` .. bu39681674 p. 2
'�� � �' Z��f�,�vC � - ���'c.s((
• , '����,`r���' ���?�;'�;�
E�`7:�z�:�����:��1`k�if�c��a�. File Number
. . . : ... . . .. .... . . �. �
Jurrsdiction Clean Water Servlces
Map & Tax Lot r ard Service Proy�der Let�er
�����AA 00901/01040 �ate 81�03
Site Address �wner Dan Bo den
E, of SW gp $ S, of �on�ct Fishman Environmenta(
SW Locust St Tl ard L�z French
Proposed Activity Land par���on Address
434 NW 6 , Suite 304
� Portland, OR 972pg.360�
- � Phone 503.224,0333
Thts form and the attached condltions wip se�,e as
accordance with Clean Water Serv►ces Deslgn and Constn, •
your Servrce provfder Lette�in
` ��on standards
'' �R8�0 03-11),
— �Resources YES NO
�Se3Smenf(NRA) !�I A�tematives Y�$�� NO
Submitted �p� � a"+a�Ysfs --�
Requtred ❑
District Slte Visif �Sectton 3.02.6) �
Date: 8/2p/03 � ❑
Tier i Altematives q�alysis �
Concur wrth N}�A/or �
submltted(nformation � � Tier 2 Altematives qna�ysps
Sensitnre Area present � ❑
On-Site � � Vegetated Corridor
Sensitive Area present Averaging � �
�Off-Site � � Vegetated Corrido�
Mitigation Requlred � �
Vegetated Cor�tdor �
Present On-Sfte �
On-Site Mitlgat�on �
-� Wldth of Vegetated �
Corridor(feef) 25 ft
Conditlon of Vegetated �ff��e M�gat�aR (�
Corridor Planbng p�an Attached L �� �
, �egraded Flnal P►antlnp p���ired
E�hancemellt AHor to construc!(on � �
Required � ❑ Enhancement/restorafion
� Encroachment into completiun date
Ve9efated Corridor
(Section 3.02.4) ❑ � RSAT(no longer required)
TYpe and Square Foatage ❑ � '
oi Encroac�ment Geotechnlcat Report
Allowed Use requlred ' � �
(Secdon 3.02.4.b.2) � � Conditions Atfached
This Seryice Provfde � �
r Letter does NOT ellminaEe the need to evaluate and
water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequent� dis
prOperty' Y covered on your protect
� reo u� u4 10: 14a Murphy 5039681674
� p. 3
� � �
MEMORAND UM
To: City of Tigard, Planning
AnN; Matt Scheidegger
Fax #: 503-684-7297
Date: 12/17/03
R�' �inevlew partitions, MLP 2003-OOOi1 and MLP 2003-00
o1z
MESSa�e; Hi Matr, As
memorandum of understanding revis'ngrmoum dlscussions, attached is a
revise the pretiminary construction drawings to e� dated 12/08/03. We will
memo.
ect the statements in this
,
IPhone 5og. 62:�-4625 1Fax o
5 3•968.16�4 sejmurphy�vQOl.com
Feb 03 04 10: 14a Murphy 50?9681674 p. 4
' lYrreview Parlitions
MLP 2Q03-00011
1. The screening that is required along the north property line of the flag pole next
to tax !ot `906' could be elther a fence or vegetation. If the property owner of
tax !ot '906' agrees and provides a landscape easement, a vegetative screen will
be placed on that property in the space between the retaining wail and the
property line. Qtherwise, a 6'-high wood fence will be constructed on the
property line, as shown on the construction drawings.
Z. Street trees are required along the north side of the driveway, since the
developer is not able to retain the six larger fir trees along the south side of the
proposed driveway (within the flag pole area oF MLP 2003-00012).
3. The tree plan submitted with the application is adequate,
4. The developer wifl construct a 5-foot wide sidewafic along the south side of the
shared driveways, in flag pole area of Parcel i created via MLP 2003-OQ012,
�~-� 5. Street lights are not required.
6. No curb is required aiong the north side of the driveway.
MLP 2003-OQ012 �
i, The screening fihat is required along the south property line of the fiag pole next
to tax lot'1001' could be elther a fence or vegetatian.
2. New street trees are not required because there is not enough raom for both
street trees and the sidewalk along the south side of the drlveway.
3. The tree pfan submitted with the application is adequate.
4. The City will not reQulre a fire apparatus turn-around.
—7 5. Street fights are not required.
6, The deveioper will construct a 5-foot wide sidewalk along the south sfde of the
flag pole. The sidewalk width includes the width of the curb,
cc. Dan Boyden
Craig Harris, LDC Design Group, Inc.
Kim McMillan, Development Review Engineer
ed+►►urphy/boydenlfineview/mattfax9/(?/IS/U3 2
�
"�"��o� � FRI 08:Qy p�s ' '' S039681674
1 5oJ ?26 7e21 p. 5
. .TIGOR TITLE
. _ �ua�
. QF7URtV RECOROFD DOCUMCNT TO:
•rn'Y tNLL ItErOADS UEPNCIMEfV1',
,. CIl'Y OI�TIGA1tD
tJ125 SW II�►161rJ. wrMnorneaun�y.ORpan 200���r757
itprd,Ou 97II7 0710U1002 OTOO:a$pM
�� o•e cM•� �i�•�t aeeo�en
' )IVIp�Al ne.a�uoo�+,.�e-re�.ib.oe
ir �—�-4—
" FikNa.M� ,���-���, �llilfilhl II(IIfINflI(IIIIIiIIIIIIIINIfI�
__ �_ . �eal2oo=oos»eioo�ao�s
� NU-p l°15 �Q 1C I,bd/�nM.D�t�t1e.l�n�bn.r�Niu�N�
y' �n�FOTC��C��wrG.nrwrwniA�unc.unry. ��
� _ �htw�►/rMfiNM�4.wK�InwW��hA.�Yqp �
. ' �YNW.���n�AS���NtlNF�Yp��(M��l %!1
, NI�LY'+P IL
^a...W�.
' . ���ryR��MtM.GIf�Nf 11n�w.n1�M��twl.n,
EASEMEN7' _ -E.�m��.`.�`�"`
PFRh�1NLNT SANlTAItY SL•WL'R
� :3IweY obm ipt�vcd fsr Wathuq,y0n Go+uvy RP<wd.•y i%orvnnnn�
���-��J6l1L�:. �_ h�iruller eallod the Grvntnrs.
gtanl ond eoovey unto Ihr riry uf Tignrd a�rpeNal elsemen!ro►canahucCing,rcoonswcting,oparting,main►aining,
in�peeting,and repninng uf an undergrourtd sewu line und appurteaances,Wgethcr with ihe rigl�t a remo�e,�s ncces.c�ry,
vaecl�tiem.loliagc,trccy,�nd a�her ob�wciions on tha�urcel of.land desc�bed in rhe�tmehed Isxhi6ii"A"sinWted in thr
(:ity v['figard,Woshin�lon Counry,5ralt vfUreean.
7HE 7'Ri/r CONSIllGRA710N Wr u�is convcy:u�ce is�S O.�U.;Hwn:vm,d�c actu7tl tpnsidenlio�consisa►of or�nel�Acs
uthcr property vr vuluc S�ven ar pron�i�cd Wht�:11 is fhc Wh01C Coruidc�atiWl.
l'1'15 T:XPRkSSLV UIVDERS"COUD�I�r�iMs cosemcm duea rwc eonvcy any righS��qe,or ui�erest exccp[thuse txpnssly
yWtod in thii eatitmcrit,nor ocberwise prcvcn�G►�u►roaifr�m thc tUll uee�nJ daen;n;on U�e�ovor,provided,Iu�wcvrr,dipt
siw)�usc shall no�intcrf�,r wi�h Jic u,as and purposes of the Inleni uf the cuscntsni
IN i:ONSIDERATION ol'ihe prcmiu�,(irwtee ayces dat ifsaitl Grancea,as n�ewsFOrs ar nssegns sl+oufd cwsc uid
cosemeq�w bc vaeurd.the�i�htt nf�he Gnntee in lhe above-desuibed eucmrnt wip he fnrtciud unA shull irtuncdiately
rc�cn�o rhe Graorort,cluir succcsaors anc!acyigas in U1e ase of�uch tve+lt..::
TO F1AV�,AND'tO HnLD the abuvc-dc.uribed mid�anted pranixa un�o�Gid Grsn�ee,its succcssors,and usiens forevcr.
M wl1'NESS Wli&Rt,OF,l hcreunlo srt my hm�d w�Iltis Z Z�C�_dyy of���,20 0 l
`�
SI�nON�t � � �
�1— �_
� � , Sibn�iurc�. � �
�sso Sr,✓. �xww.?C r. � 2�?�U � (��`'��_�__
Adress AO�4fe�c,�' /�
��1.:1�A Q2 S 7 GD 6 _ � �� lLl.�lA� l�+U _I�
QQ� -----
, ' �,, .��3o U �,,,� �a�
STA11iOFQA�CON ) �� �
)�3 . �
COWIIyJrWJ�hiPs10� � ' • � ,
11�is mswmcn�was atknuwleJgeJ 6el'ore nit on ,���C�_(due)by:��f��-'n��I�G� l i�o � t`
---.�—— — �,�_, .�_ _(name of pcnon{s)). —
UFFIC���SEAL
PAN YOYO
NOiAqY PUB1�C•OPFGO ��
� �nMMiS510N NO,�1J615 � . . �
MrrAANn�NnD�nfS.xar.t2 7op� �_
`�'�sx`�. . Nuury'eSi(Sp;.ture �--
My Comioiss(on Fxpirca:_.,�U�p 'j��,��'Z
�� ,
Atccptcd on l�h�lf of th�City of 1 igord thi� �Q day of„�+�d�'.b�Y ,TOa�.
. �C.t �`�i�L�.�....�..
Ciry EoKmear —`
NO Ci1M1(:E W TAX STATxMF:NT " . .
�.�Gr1:IPrCRwr•.)n�+�.l.ti.l . � , �
�' Feb 03 04 10: 15a Murohy 5039681674 p. 6
12JOS/OJ � FRI 08:4J F�X 1 50 8 7821 TICOR T1TLE
�
. �
__. ._ _ :.._:._. _. . . .._
, _ _.. .. .. _. ..... .... . ., .. . T o8
�
i
• — S i Ji���e:,. � ��� �I� .
:1�i':��':'::)1ls:. I � I�� �I
� �� ����
. p�i ����/� �
/: �'1Y.':�4`7� �VO�.�Z7�T � �
�Y,.G�� __ __.. __i.._
' ..�. i. . . ._ .-..._
6 �
.; .:..'�:u.f:" '1
��+ai% �
' I
�
i
DESCRIPTION FOR SANITARY SEW�R EASEMEN7 �
: i
7HAT POR710N OF THE NORTHEAST OUART�R OF..SEC71�N 35,T. 1 S.,R. 1 W,WM•,
WASHINGTON CQUNYY,OREGON MORE PARTICULI4RLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST�ORNCR OF TNE�TRACT OF lANO TO WOLF RECORD�D AS
DOC.N0. 2D010a6638 OF 7HE DEED RECORQS OF:�Sa�D COUNN:
THENCE N00°35'OB"�N, 13.65 FEET ALONG:TNE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF S.W.90r"
AVENUE;TNENCE LEAVING SAID EASTEFiLY RIGH7 OF WAY LINE,S88'33'04"E, 100.32 FEET T4
A POINT�N THE WEST LINE OF YF1E TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DOC.N0.2001038127 OF
SAID RECORDS:TFiENCE S00"35'0.8'E,10:i8 FEET ALONG SAID WFST LINE TO THE NORTHEAST
CORNER OF THE TRACT OF LAND DE5CRIBED.IN DOC.NO, 83023187 OF SAID RECORDS;
YHENCE 599'28'0�''►J, 100.26 FEET ALONG THE NO Tfi LINE Of SAIO TRACT TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING. °�
i
. � . .. .i
. ,�
11107101
7009SK3.DOC 'I
I
. � I
�
�
- J
. i
- �
. I
; . �
� ; �
_ . � .
�
. . . I
. �
�
� �I
�
� i
: �
I
I
: I
, . �
Feb 03 04 10: 15a Murphy 5039681674 p. 7
12/05i0� , �I 08:4J FAY 1 50 8 7821 TICOR TITLE._..
,`' , ,_, _ ..__ .. �009
� . . � �T 411111 ___T_____�__�____________
1 �11
111111
IIII1I
�NI _
� 11
� ' � � �0��-2�'�7 . � pESCRIP 1?ON SKETCH
� � _ �—..— .�.— — .._ '_ �,W tHf NEl/I OF SfCIlGW J5. T. ] S, R I W..
� � � � ��{(,, WAShYNC�ON CWNlY. LiPECON
� 1 . I
� � I
4 � � ' �
� � . 1
� I � . ' I
� i ! • . : l
� 1 . _ �- I
I � . . . �
� � ' I
� I . � /
� � • ' I i�
I { � i
I � � ��
� { � . � I i
1 � � �i
� � ' � � � i
--J I � ..: � �
� �-- - -- -- � ----___-____�._-----------�
4 �
,
F�-----^-----•----. ----------'�,`
--- — � �
�
� � �
I ��
� �
� � � �`
• �� �
� � �
� �
__..� . ���..—
� � .. ��
1 ��
1 � ��
� �
� DOC.'N0. 700lO�B6J9 ��
1 � ��
� � ��
� � �
1 . .�
I � � �OP��SCU W2UC
� I SpNiTApr SEYIER OOC, N0. TOOlOJd119
� Q � C119iMEN1
i � a SB8�1'04 E !OO J7" _ $
Q i �
i � ^� o0
� � 1 $~ � 5es7eoo"w �oo.zs' i�
i 1
I � � I
t � � �
� I I
I V
� , .
� � DOC. NO BJO�Jiel I
1 I I
� � � - �
� � : . . �
� I . . 1
I I � : ' � N ��
' � � .
' � i � �
� ' � � �
� i �'
► i . _^�__^_-,_�_-�--�--
� L.�-- ---•------�_�--.__�
� � : . .
! �
� I I '
1 � : ,
' � � '
1 �
I •
� � . . .
� Feb 03 04 10: 15a Mur—tiy 50?^681674 p. 8
14/05i0J , FRI 08:43 FAC 1 50, 8 7821 TICOR TITLE �O10
, , ,
, ._ .. ...... ... . ._.
:.. . ............ _,..,
_.. _ ... . .... _..._...�... . . _ .__..._. _. .. -. ...
� ' : :;...,•...:,..•...._,;:;u
� w•�nyn�....n��ua.u�lnr.,<i_w:_„'t.,i...�n�- :_.'_.:__t._.,_.._'..rY:�i�:`::•.!- ..... •-� ���
�z:,,. -_-- _ .,,K•�.�..,�.,-d : �8 2 0 I 0 4 6 6 G' �
l : 'tl�, uY:;i,,qnu�._.wnr r...U00n�Nn i �,
� uNO�o e�.L n�EN UY 7Y.ESIi�•RE+GNTS�Thsi. "'.�_.. , .. .Hen;a��fl����rtcAprsnWa �f f.
� ....i'GAA'C.Eti..V. CI{A1MNN....... .. . . .... . .... �r. �mn . .. . . ... ....... II �
� Iar t��n cor✓:d.��av��hneirod�rr unud.Jma 6vrehy Irnnt.Wr�;uln,Jd!��d'�' r' .... . ... ........... �
311IRLYY..I.. RU�fC„ fBDY�C. uUOO.Ak9 FMI.C�S �.•f.MYiNN . ..ihn cunda r.�IPrunnb'n•dhdH �I � .
IKrs�n�dlrr M�ftd�retwee��in0 r,qo I:r�mlc�+Irc�rs,wcet�ron.�N�J nlv/IP)�t10�'ll' MfMi(IIM�.nr��rtcJ�n NK Cwnr� � 1 .
anm�rnin.hc�rdir�n��••�r�nr�J npnuAr�NM�:llkrtun�4 IW�o���el�pr Ni nnW' 1'P I
I ('n0111,n t0� .,Slo�u 01 Oic(,o�6 de:crtOoJ.u:la74�•+,�e-n�t: . f'
oL�........,.�.. G....�....
� Ths Hortl� )V feac �f I...co ) nnJ h. D1oaN l9, T04N OF I2YiQE1�'�'.An:]5 T15. R{��i � .
� � uaohinc�en Ceunty. Ore[u�� �:ub1«` t° u on��r eoichenc atfecttn�: rne �o��ci� 74 I
i fec� of eh� Nortli ID Ic�•� oE �.eld Loto ] onJ �. I� l'..
�
' �
� I �
� , , I f..
' Fel:�.e doe� noe �vr�ecce eooltncr ee�ee ovN InhllJty oe aep'Ctt wn4 •pptov�l
� �::'.
1 � . �� I�..
�..
•�`ru[ i�cxt uF Tuis necu IS TO CRFI�TE��NE'W't�%�.OS �•
` I� ,.�
I �:...
� ' ' �, .t s
II t--
111:MCI MII\���C�IM� �UNI Oltf���liF 0��1YIUl fW{I .� � ll ��'•
70 r/ave an�to HaM�ena enme unro d«�•+�d:Qrnnles�n/Jranlrn�heir�.fuKQ::O�s und uNi/nl fernver, �. ..
t.��J b�brni1�u daffnn��:3 •0-.�. � .
� Tiw lrue und refuo�cvniidero�lun+�aiJ fvr A�i.I�.n+la7�7 � ue fren or ytaMted aldeli i� '�..
ry�����yaN•�tMFw�I�•I.lur/JnOR'YII.OM.J �
0fforc.crr fhe�vuel conwde:olron���Wfa Of or''Iry,dn�yTItM����r Or ol 1 I
' �Mrhd: [OtlydeCn(IDP C��duefP li'1NCIrJ� �rnr..�r.,�ce
nll rOn�lit�l
Arl�l tlu �
� 1��on14�iN 11�■dce!ee�when Ihu eente�tvo«9ui�a,Iho nn��f���uKl�i olti�`lo�nd Y%d�. l' �:
I WnRn�IwG 6e imC���la iMk�fln P�vr(+iens hv�Af n��Y�e��NY IocOt/o�' yc��,��.r ..,I�.O 1 �.
(n Witrrc:7 Wh�nol.Ilie JiMlO[Aa�r�eN��d ilw 1nalNm�nf Ih'�.....b ��fl�offKlfL dulY nuthOnard(fw�[fa OY ,
i/•ca�p.rna pen�or.i!M�anvuJ ilf Mmr�0 4r iiL^�d�nd Kd�e//ieA Y� j �_
. � aadcr d�u�o•,J or�u«iw,. ._�io-�•t�..�:�y ' ��?1L�� . . ,
I i' �:• �. c�IItL l, q1�N3
1 .`.:
" .cr,�1 t .l.l,(Y�K'C. .... , . I.
,.......... ,..
I Fconcc� �� ��aCmsn . ��(�OOD ; .... �. � .
�/ l
wwr.ii�:i:��+uo..n.ti • .� . . . ' �� .�., Ju. �� :
'� STAT'6 0/O!(EaOM,Cwidl•f.-...^__.__.v. .- ... li
��rr or oRG00M, t�� ' '� /1.+.--•-- ' �
......w.
. __»-..�...-._.
( ., . ...,.�......wl
(,'i��l/•I_...k1N�119�[OO ..._....1 ..PMI/wJl/MiMY�/�.....�..:...r.«r......�....._� � "
..,..._...�..e�K+�r..,.��. , ..
_...Aaccs�h.at.__...................u.K�.. ....._.�...__,.__...._.,_.m......._ ����rn��rnw,�.�M '
. ��d Ier MorNl u1 w.�•••f�' � •�u� t -
ry..�Pr�I'M��.1�M�4�r.wu«f...-..,..... �� ' ,........:�-...........�......_....... � ._...-.�. . ,
$1,lslrt i. vavc, 1uC:.CC.wads.,..,...... :� ,......... .,rM'•�d.��_.M�,�..1
Y_. ._.. ..,.._........, . . .._
_._..... ............ �' '' . .. «.+
W chn mon ... . ........,.< ��M
...F.�.neao •. .......P.............._.......,....... ..._..:__---.,...._ �
,......_.....�,J�e�ne.d�a1�fIN Iv�{OIqI M�IN- ' IN IWI IF�IPI�III�d'b IYN I�JI K.nr�.ai•ynW m1�,�4/ro o.' I
....�.........�_.. ' ..N�.p�MMIM M1 Ih�i . a(
rn
u,,,.,,,'� � .e. .� .w.�Mii n..«ul..��.��Aordr vl d.6.�.�el t��cww•��d...a
y�1n11J II. ...�C f...���......... � WIINII'M�1J J�II.
� 6C1.4!.l•e' +^•� eM��*�.m/1�.�..N jn����mrn m r.l��•• (OFFIGU �
Y. a �...._..i�.T..G:� ' ' . � stAa)
u...�...,,,,�.:.:..t... . � .........._._.. .....__..
� �oFrre�nc .../... .,.._.: ::':-•,�•r-.. ,...........__.......__._.�.,
I I�...:�.,:'...: i......1 �u.l.�ur.
:cw� FrS n�u�.r� a+:
ry �(r1�'l�071!�::Z'�.I�� Ilr aTinad.n aplrw , . .
�I �y wM-..d.r._-. .
1 , . , .�T�iE OF Dlll'�OM.
I ... .. .. . . - qw�y.rw..wep.� 5
__ .._ .
! r
. . ......
- . .... .._...... .... . _
I .......... .. _........... . � , .. .. Oon�k :' i�c� o��a r n: --
„_. .-....._.....
._:.. .. . . .
......... ...-....._.._.......��..
1. W Mua�0� la i
�...i••+awnr �,Ps 1'eUYWI'iNO�ErO�YUv�IHN01 d n•
.••-•�• : .'' t111/In�l
I . . � ... ' i
• - � ..... ... � � . . M� M.�rM'i c 4 of ��J Cvvm��
.. .. . ....... .... .MO Y�I` � .
' ' '� ............ �.....K��e�. , ,� UonNO W.Mi 'Dtra�o.N
I I _
...._ :......._.._. . , ;. ..
........��. w"'� �
� ' '�ow�a....�.,......... . re+ . ' •. ��awime��n0 Tw�UOn.En
����,, W.QG° :(�+�/. �is�Nr�• .. .. �OI�kMI'.I�;OkYMCkf� 1�
� r,��N,��� 9d��� �- .... :. • a '�� .;,;_ I
;»._. .... � . ,_ . , o I
7'�a^,('. O'��.::9.�..��.... � /C� . i1
•.a���.�r�r.�..uid�I1��MM���N��r�l N�W w it11M1�Y��/1.a. � . �� I _
;. .. .. .< 1991�PIt 21 GI110:2d ,
.� �� —: ._ _w::::�.o•r�u'.�.. ... -- —_ — � — .
�.-�-- �
� ...., — .... .... � . . � . - ,
. - ., s., ',
. .. •��awi!-L��y�, I �_�Q� _.
'..J.::.r-.�^—..T— f . C�� ' .
�t�71981 • �� r� , , . . .
.I� � F ._� � I� . ' . . . . . ,� n ��s"y":��ar�'r•
I r ���yy� '� . � ���� ••� ,.Ai.:s �t }�7 q`� �r�� '� �I:�-1.;�'uia�.=�-
. ' i .m�.`��.�.Ql�li� i�t�/'6�'� v /!'i� �) ~ 1�f.A �'�`., �M�If ��i•`.��i:lti�� ,1� .. :`.yi':dFn•'.'..��;�. t 1.
�i.�.r1�N�'�C,�.�.. .n,iJ. ��.._.���\i\��Y�:��!'411.w ,l. Y
Feb 03 04 10: 16a Mur y 50�^581674 p. 9
l��vaiva , FRI OB:44 FAC 1 503 7921 TICOR TITLE.._„ I�O11
� , : • � .
� d " , � sTATE OF oaroON
. } 68
' • COUnty ot Wohlnalon
�� . - . lA 12.!
I,Jerry p_np�,c�AOr ol Anees-
J►FTIiR RECORDING� ��� T�' . �man� �nd 9t>n �nr1 r�C�Ar.Jo County
�- . Cl�rk for�ll '.auMy uv�����K rUty rhat
� lhewhAj�i�inu��Q{b(w�W 1iY�ac�lved
Paai�ia Crast Pprtn�r�, :Ino. .�nd ro�rd.d,'.jn'coaK.�- � o� •�d
•coU�ly:-C i , ��', k�
�� 1
"~ 1.' 0 Cae e-d R a . , : �
� ' . . . . . , . ��'r' . •. � .;..-', � �..��.
Nood River. OR y7031 ,,
-i`uprry R Hq�o' Tflr.elor ol
. deeYAdM`u��bn.Ex-
. , �M1q�Cp�ly�lork
� Doe : 200o00.T21
. � : � Rect: 2�7290 77.00
01/19/2000 1A:33:04e�
`Q AI�t�Dl�HT TO:.EAS6M�NT '
1 :'
� p, Petec A..�Savaqe aad 'M'n Savaqe (hetein "Savage"? are
okners of certain :property at 10304 .Sw 90`", Ti.gacd, Oregon, n►cre
� particularly descxibed as .the.northerly. TO feeC of LOts 3 arid 9�
� Hl.ock 19, TUWN OF MeTZGER, Washinqton County, Oreqon. The
southerly 7 +� feet o� the property �f Savage is subicct to an
easemenC Lor pu�poses o'f installation and maiataining a seWer line
whiCh was recorded on A�ril 2T, •19H2 � DocumQ�t Nws►2�e� 620104b6 �
washington County �ecords, .
� B, Pursuant. .to. a .5ettlement• Aqr.eement execttited amonq
m� Savaqe, Judy C. � Wood,: .FrdnCis:: W: Chapman and Pacific Crest
� �, Partners, Inc., Savaqe.a.qzQecl upon ��rtain coi�dicions to expand the
�-� easement. 'rhose conditions; have been satisfied. E'ine�iew Farm,
� o LLc, will acquire Che;proper.ty Co the north and w�st and is tne
�Z sueces��r in interest to the easenient .rights.
m �` a reed that the easesnent
� c NOW, TF�EREFORC, it:. i3 ?sereby g
ti � dcscrib�:d abov� is hereby aa�ended so thaC the area oi Che easement
is expanded to the soucrierly 15 feee of the property owned by
� r Sav�qe, described above. Except as amended herein, the easement
p remains in full force and effect. � �savage acknvwl�dges receipt of
� considQration fOr th�s amendiner�t: to th� eaSement.
Dated: � �� �� : � • ': pgTER A. SAVAGE �
� . . . JL=�d-�S�'-=d -
��(1 . . �. ". . ANN 5AVAGE .
� /// � � �
� •
/// �
' ' .112299
pn�E 1 - AMENDMENT TO EASEMENT.
� �� . .
. . • ; • .. .
Feb 03 04 10: 168 MUr' '`y SO��S81674 P. 10
14/05�OJ FRI 08:44 FAX 1 509 7811 _ _TICOR__TITLE �012
.� ., .
, _ ... .. ..._ � :
.�
'; r .
��
.�
� .�.' . . . . . .
STATE OF OREGON �� �?.
i ,� SS,
� COUNTY OF WASHTt�TGTON ')
This instrument .was .acknowledged before sne on this �
� day, af �;�j� '�Y Peter A. Savage.
• � o}rt�cu►�s
BARMM HASK1�
STATE OF OREGON' ; :�. ' MOTAP�p��p��C-0i1EC.�
�■.`; ;� �.�,�•,�i��lnV Np.922kN
• , ,
1:, = .�.: S5- MYLO!.�Id1''til�n�•',. +;L`.�i`J'I1.18,i00�
CQU��TY oF `�'u1�1' )�
This ,in,�trument. was .acknawledged qn this �" day of
,�ZCL�D : by Anri.�avaqe. �
�,�1(V�,�.�
� NO'PARY PUBLIC FOR OREGON
�aFfx1AL8�11L ..
Cp� : �
NClTIWY PIBUG011�01�. • .
COMi6ti0M W-�0� . . •
!(Y COiYSbMM'��F PE9���� . � .
.� � .
j . ..
:i .. .
, �i . . .
� � .. .
r � . . .
+ . , . .. . ..
i
:i
?AGE 2 - AMF:NnN1ENT 'T0 .�,ASEMENT .112299
� �
i
a . .
;� '
,. . .
�� � � . . � .
�
;I � , .
. ��
.
.
� „ � . e .
� � � ,
MEMORANDUM
To: City of Tigard, Planning
ArTN: Matt Scheidegger
Fax #: 503-684-7297
Date: 12/17/03
Re: Fineview partitions, MLP 2003-00011 and MLP 2003-00012
MESSAGE: Hi Matt. As per our discussions, attached is a
memorandum of understanding revising my memo dated 12/08/03. We wili
revise the preliminary construction drawings to reflect the statements in this
memo.
� s��..r �i � `=
DEr, � � � ?p��
CITY OF TIGARD
PLANNING/ENGINEERIN�
I
�Phone 503• �24-4625 ■Fax 503.968.Y674 ■ejmurphy@aol.com
. �
.
Firteview Partations
MLP 2003-0�011
1. The screening that is required along the north property line of the flag pole next
to tax lot '906' could be either a fence or vegetation. If the property owner of
tax lot `906' agrees and provides a fandscape easement, a vegetative screen will
be placed on that property in the space between the retaining wall and the
property line. Otherwise, a 5'-high wood fence will be canstructed on the
property line, as shown on the construction drawings.
2. Street trees are required along the north side of the driveway, since the
developer is not able to retain the six larger fir trees along the south side of the
proposed driveway (within the flag pole area of MLP 2Q03-00012).
3. The tree plan submitted with the application is adequate.
4. The developer will construct a 5-foot wide sidewalk along the south side of the
shared driveways, in flag pole area of Parcel 1 created via MLP 2003-00012.
5. Street lights are not required.
6. No curb is required along the north side of the driveway.
MLP 2003-00012
1. The screening that is required along the south property line of the flag pole next
to tax lot '1001' could be either a fence or vegetation.
2. New street trees are not required because there is not enough room for both
street trees and the sidewalk along the south side of the driveway.
3. The tree plan submitted with the application is adequate.
4. The City will not require a fire apparatus turn-around.
5. Street lights are not required.
6. The developer will construct a 5-foot wide sidewalk along the south side of the
flag pole. The sidewalk width includes the width of the curb.
cc. Dan Boyden
Craig Harris, LDC Design Group, Inc.
Kim McMillan, Development Review Engineer
edmurphy/boyden/finevrew/mattfcrx9/12/I S/03 2
Dec 16 03 04: 55p Murphy 5n�9681674 p. l
a'
� � , �
� � � �
MEMORANDUM
To: City of Tigard, Planning
ATTN: Matt Scheidegger
Fax #: 503-684-7297
Date: 12/17/03
RE; Finevlew partitions, MLP 2003-00011 and MLP 2003-00012
MESSAGE: Hi Matt. As per our discussions, attached is a
memorandum of understanding revising my memo dated 12/08/03. We wil!
revise the preliminary construction drawings to reflect the statements in this
memo.
■Phone ,503. 624-4625 ■Fax gog.g68.xb�4 ■ejmurphyC�aol.corn
Dec 16 03 04: 55p Murphy 50�9691674 p. 2
:.. '
Fineview t'artitions
MLP 2003-00011
i. The sc�eening that is required a4ong the north property line of the flag pole next
to tax lot �906' could be either a fence or vegetation. If the property owner of
tax fot '906' agrees and provides a iandscape easement, a vegetative screen will
be placed on that property in the space between the retaining wall and the
property line. Otherwise, a 6'-high wood fence will be constructed on the
property line, as shown on the construction drawings.
2. Street trees are required along the north side of the driveway, slnce the
developer is not able to retain the six la�ger fir trees along the south side of the
proposed driveway (within the flag pole area of MLP 2Q03-00012).
3. The tree plan submitted with the application is adequate.
4. The developer will construct a 5-Foot wide sidewalk along the south side af the
shared driveways, in flag pole area of Parcel 1 created via MLP 2003-00012.
S. Street lights are not required.
6. No curb is required along the north side of the driveway.
MLP 2003-00012
i. The screening that is required along the soufih property line of the flag poie next
'to tax lot `1001' could be either a fence or vegetation.
2. New street trees are not required because there is not enough room for both
street trees and the sidewalk along the south side af the dr+veway.
3. The tree plan submitted with the application is adequate.
4. The City wilk not require a fire apparatus turn-around.
5. Street lights are not required.
6. The developer will construct a 5-foot wide sidewaik along the south side of the
flag poie. The sidewalk width include5 the width of the curb.
cc. Dan Boyder�
Craig Harris, LDC Design Group, Inc,
Kim McMillan, Development Review Engineer
edmurphy/boyden/fineview/mcttfax9112115/03 2
�
. � - ,� � �A�
� � � � � � .
' � �
MEMORANDUM
To: City of Tigard, Planning
A�rrN: Matt Scheidegger
Date: 12/8/03
Re: Fineview partitions, MLP 2003-00011 and MLP 2003-00012
MESSAGE: Hi Matt. A few days ago, LDC Design Inc. submitted
construction drawings for these two partitions. You and Kim may have noticed
that the drawings are not exactly in synch with my statement of
understanding memo to you dated September 25, 2003. Saving the existing
trees along the south side of the flag pole of MLP 2003-00012 (tax lot '10Q0')
turned out to be problematic. On the advise of Raymond Myer, an arborist
(see attached letter) and LDC Design Group, Inc., Mr. Boyden decided to
remove all six of these trees. The City approval did not include a requirement
to retain those particular trees or mitigate their loss.
The following pages reflect our revised understanding: �°��
_ ��F
o O
A�q��,,yroFT 81003
�� �
FN������
NG
■Phone So3. 624-4625 ■Fax 503.968.1674 ■ejmurphy@aol.com
� , � ,,
Fineview Parritions
MLP 2003-00011
1. The screening that is required along the north property line of the flag pole next
to tax lot '906' could be either a fence or vegetation. If the property owner of
tax lot '906' agrees, a vegetative screen will be placed on that property, in the
space between the retaining wall and the property line. Otherwise, a 6'-high
wood fence will be constructed on the property line, as shown on the
construction drawings
2. Street trees are required along the north side of the driveway, since the
developer is not able to retain the six larger fir trees along the south side of the
proposed driveway (within the flag pole area of MLP 2003-00012). However,
because there is not enough room physically to create a suitable planter strip,
the developer will plant 4 or 5 trees elsewhere on the site in lieu of the street
trees.
3. The tree plan submitted with the application is adequate.
4. The developer will construct a sidewalk along the south side of the shared
driveways, in flag pole area of the Parcel 1 created via MLP 2003-00012.
MLP 2003-00012
1. The screening that is required along the south property �ine of the flag pole next
to tax lot '1001' could be either a fence or vegetation.
% � 2. New street trees are not required because there is not enough room for both
street trees and the sidewalk along the south side of the driveway.
, 3. The tree plan submitted with the application is adequate.
,-. 4. The City will not require a fire apparatus turn-around.
- 5. The developer will construct a sidewalk along the south side of the flag pole.
There are also a couple items on the construction drawings that either were not
specifically required, or that are different from our previous understanding. I have
discussed these items with Craig Harris, LDC Design Group, and he concurs with
the following comments:
1. Two street lights are shown on the construction drawings. These were not
specifically required as a condition of approval, and normally street lights are
edmurphy/boydenlfineview/mattfax9/12/08/03 2
. . • ,
Fineview Partitions
not required on private driveways. In order to reduce the developer's capitai
costs and the resident's on-going operating costs, and also eliminate the
negative impact of these lights on the adjacent properties, we are requesting
that no street lights be required. If the City agrees, these should be stricken
from the submitted construction drawings.
� � The sidewalk width is shown on the drawings as 5' wide. My understanding was
u
� that the City would allow a 42"-wide sidewalk in this development, since the
sidewalk only serve a couple homes. (Attached is a copy of my memo dated
September 25, 2003, and your letter agreeing with the points in that memo.) It
may be that because the six existing fir trees are being removed after all, the
City again wants a 5'-wide sidewalk. However, we would propose sticking to the
42"-width, which is more than adequate to serve the pedestrian needs of the
residents. If the City agrees, the sidewalk width should be changed to 42" in
the submitted construction drawings.
3. The extruded curb along the north side of the driveway is not necessary, and
should be deleted from the submitted construction drawings. If the City agrees,
that curb should be eliminated in the submitted construction drawings.
On a different subject, I am enclosing one copy of the planting plan for the
landscaping of the wetland buffer area. I will also send a copy to CWS's for its
review and comment.
Again, thank-you for working with us on these partitions. We appreciate the
flexibility and responsiveness shown by you and Kim.
cc. Dan Boyden
Craig Harris, LDC Design Group, Inc.
Kim McMillan, Development Review Engineer
edmurphy/boyden/fineview/mattfax9/12/OS/03 3
October 2, 2003
CITY OF TIGARD
Ed Murphy OREGON
9875 SW Murdock
Tigard, Or 97223
Dear Ed:
This letter is in regard to your memo dated September 25th 2003. The summary
of your memo is an accurate depiction of the issues raised and agreed to in our
meeting on September 24th 2003. I have made a copy of the memo for the files
and placed case notes in the City's tracking system indicating the changes we
agreed to.
If you have further concerns about the Fineview Partitions do not hesitate to call
me. I am available to answer questions and otherwise assist you as may be
required at 503-639-4171, extension 2437. Office hours are from 8:00 a.m. to
5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. If I am not available, please leave your name
and phone number so that I can call you back as soon as possible.
Sincerely,
�
t�-�c� 2,�.
athew Scheidegge
Associate Planner
13125 5W Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772
�� - - ��� -_ __ -- - _ _ - �--��- �-- -__ __- -- �- �-- --
�� �
�r�llmltea
ARBORIST REPORT
Address af�he Report: Ftneview Fa�rR Developrrrer�
SW 90`h
Tigard, 0 R
Date of the ReRQrt: �ctnt�er 4� 20Q3
Report Submitted To: Ed Murphy & associates PH: 503-624-4625
Attn: Ed Murphy F�: 5E}�-968-1G74
I met with Ed Murphy on October 9, 2003 at the site to discuss the pros and cons of
saving the 6 DoErglas Fir trees on the sot��h side o€Efte propos��rfvevrra�.
Herein is a list of pros and cons for your considerations. Please call if you want to
discuss ttrem fcrrth�r:
PR �
1. There are 6 medium size Douglas Firs that if saved could provide a nice
buf�ef of fc�liage sereening betweerfi exist+ng homes and ��re rter+�
development elements.
2. Environmentally it is always in our best interest to reta+n trees for obvious
reasons.
3. You woc�ld r�at have to r�►ftiga�e witFt new s�reeE tree�.
�N,�
1. Elf the 6 trees, 4 of �he� are sk►awir�g severe signs of s�ress, pos�bt�
related to previous excavation or other root damaging work near them.
Qrre of�kte Firs had lost its or-igina� t�ar�d has some poof str�tcxa!
developments because of that. Since they are already in poor condition,
the�C may no� s�,cuive fur�her roat damag�_
RRSidentixl and C�mmerr.ial Spraying• Fertilizing•Pruning•Landscape fnstallation•Lan�iscape Maintenance•Consu�tfltion
MEM8Ek3; Iv�tianai A��cuis��ssvsia�ion • Inter�►allo+�a1 Soeie�y o�Afboriet�IEure�Oregon Assoeiaticm af�iurser�IrneF�
Oregon Golf Course Superintendents'Association • Oregon Landscape Contractors Association
Sfate Licensed Troo Sorvice�ifi2G35• L;�ndscnpo Contractor#5659 •CT�emical Application:t�00231 • In�urcaci
P.�. Bpx 1 S66-lake Oswe�o,Of� 97035•503-635-3165 •Vancaiaver 360-737-2f,46 • FAX 5t�3-G35-1549
Visit our website at wwu�.tr�ecarHlrtncisca{�es.c�m
. , . ,
2. The construction of the driveway is going to cover up SO°�o of the root
syst�ms, up to 75% o� th�eastefly trees. This ak>�e eat�ld kiN the�Fees�
however I've seen t�ees survive such trauma, if precautions are taken.
3. Tree pro�ectf�r pla+�s wll� have�Q be developed and adhered Eo if yo�
choose to keep the trees. There will be costs related to that for the plans,
site �isiEs by the arborisE, prc>tectio� feFlein9, P�'�ning and remedfa+care to
help encourage new root growth. (Cost: Approximately $3,000 - $4,000)
4. Sav�Ftg the�Fees wtFF reqt�ir�1►tEle�o r�o grade eFia�ges sc>as to preven�
further root loss. Careful considerations for trenching to accommodate
utitities.
S. Tree #4(aumbeF trees uvest ta east - 1 thru 6} shauld be remoued ta.
accommodate the driveway design.
6. Savt�tg tk►e Erees will triggef art i�rvolvemen� Fesponse by t#�e TigaFd Ctt�
Arborist. Not sayfng Matt Stein's involvement is a negative issue,
how�uer i� �ill meac� more paPe�vuork and ti�ne to accommodate pe�mE��,
site visits and tree preservation measures all monitored by the City and
Ehe si�e arboFist.
�. Evns��ae�ion Fne�Mocfs may hav�Ea be a{te�ed to accor�+r�rodaEe �oo�
protection. This could increase the cost of site development.
8. �1+�fmateEy tk�e �rees couEd di�a� the cost �or remova► wa�ld be 2 to-3
times more expensive once fences, walks, roadways and homes are in
p{a�t �ktat� if rernoved F►ow.
If I can be of further service, please give me a call.
Respe G�Y, ��
.% �, ,.-l��...i��!/.
/ �..
Raymond Myer, General Manager
Tree Care & Landscapes URfirrr'►t�d, frre.
Certified Arborist by the International
SoCiety of ArbOri�ulture, LiC. # RN-QI6fY
Oregon Landscape Contractors Lic. # 11604
dregon Dept. of Agricufture, Commerciaf
Pesticide Applicators License # Q0187
TQTA� P.�3
l
^�-yi' B
f ��.Y i Y Y Y H➢�'��.9 8
� + 3
I�RQ3 � ���
�. ��� � �� �
�
�
� �,a����b�' ��,�'��a� � ,
� � �'� I���9 I �
� ' .
:,;: . _�_- - :;,•;;:
.y.; Y..' � �� ,��•
� •
• ' � . �;.
c� o ;�
o �� •
� :. :.r.
� i.
O�1 ,f.
`� �
� • -..' ,
� �� �
♦ •.'
1e ' ��•�'•
.� '.
,� , . :.•,,,:,:.:.:•':.: '.' ,,
00 • " , ,` .'•••.•'''''.'.'.',•.,. .,., .;
ti°o� ' Q'•�' ..l . .:.;
�'� O :-,-'
4,0� 'I..,� ,a
�cy �;�.•
f oA k-' ��i� I�
} • ._s._.-. � �
� * � • Q�
. �
•
�
� �
� r � � � FINEVIEW FARM,LLC P���� � �
- .... � 15500 SW JAY STFiEET
9 � � � M����� BEAVERTON,OR. 97Q06 P� �
3
. � �, ,
.�
I
n
♦ �
U
r;
' C
7
I
n I
u
'NATIVE PLANTS' LEGEND '
�
n
n
U
PLANT SYh1BOL QUAN�I'(1' BpTANtCAL NAME COMMON NAME NOTES �
�S C
05 ALNUS RU6RA �—� RED ALG'Ek �
• OS ' FRAXINUS LAT!FOUA ORPGO+� ASn
' 05 PSEUD�TSUGA MENZIE511 DOUGlAS PIR
03 PRUt�US EN!AR6rNATa. BITfER CHERRY
�� 05 GIUFRCUS GARRYANA OREG?N 1A'F11TE O�K �
`� 05 TtiUJA PuCATA WE57ERN RED CEDAR �
' a—
q�R � _ - �
- -- — - ._ _ _ i c
RUBS °
c
- ' - --- _ c
08 AMELA�CHIER A�NIFCLJA WESTERM SERVICEBERRY
08 OtMLE�Iti CER/L5IFORMIS I+JD°AN PLUM
+ 09 � RIBES SANGUIVEJM RFC FLOWPeING CURRHNT
• pG : ROSA G�?J+IOCAIZPA � BALDHIP R05E
* �g ^ eOSA NUTICAN.4 iJOOTKA ROSE �
<
� � ��� SAMBUCUS R►�G�MOSA RFD ELDERBERRY �
� " —. -- - — — �
c
c
� c
/� , ���v` ��� �
` � �
� ;
�' ', ex15TIniG OAr� t � �, E;<ISTiNG a5� j „ .j EX,STING DECIDUO�JS
�
� % `.,\ r,' � � �
�. .�` `�.��.-` ������
i
c
r
r
r
�
� � � � � � .
' / �
FAX TRANSMITTAL MEMO
To: City of Tigard, Planning ��� �
!�G� O�� r�
ATTN: Matt Sche�degger
Fax#: 503-684-7297
Date: 9/19/03
RE: Fineview partitions, MLP 2003-00011 and MLP 2003-00012
MESSAGE: Matt, we have a few concerns about the conditions of
� approval for these two minor partition applications, and would like to meet
with you as soon as possible to clarify and hopefully revise some of the
conditions that we feel are unworkable. The following memo presents our
concerns, and provides some recommendations.
RECEIVED
SFP 19 2003
CITY OF TIGARD
�'L.ANNtWCif�N(3�E�R IN(T
cc. Dick Bewersdorff, Planning Manager
Kim McMillan, Development Review Engineer
■Phone So3. 624-4625 ■Fax 503.968.1674 lejmurphy�aol.com
Fineview partitioru
Matt, as I understand it, the following summarizes the staff decision on the two
proposed partitions:
■ Both partitions require street trees.
■ Both partitions require a sidewalk along one side of the shared driveways.
■ Both partitions require screening along the outside property line, i.e., along tax
lot `906' on the north and `1001' on the south.
• Both partitions require "No Parking" signs along both sides of the shared
driveways.
■ Partition MLP2003-00012 requires a fire apparatus turn-around. Partition
MLP2003-00011 does not.
■ Both partitions require a tree plan.
So, what you have essentially approved are two side-by-side shared driveways,
totaling a 20'-wide paved•area within a 30'-wide space, with a 5'-wide sidewalk
along one side of the shared driveways. For the driveway on the side where the
sidewalk would be built, there would be no room for street trees, and the fence and
no parking signs would have to be installed in the sidewalk. For the driveway on
the other side, there would be a 5' space, in which the fence, signs and street trees
could be installed. Further, the six fir trees on the property, ranging in size from
21" to 43", will have to be removed in order to plant about 10 new "street trees."
In addition, you are requiring a fire apparatus turnaround for partitian MLP 2003-
00012 (tax lot 1000), but not for MLP 2003-00011. A fire apparatus turnaround
would have to be either a cul-de-sac or a hammerhead-configured turnaround.
We do not think that the conditions of approval are workable, nor do they produce
the results that I think the City, and certainly the applicant, desires. Apparently,
we were not clear in our application.
Shared driveways:
The applications are for two partitions, both of which have 15' of frontage, the
required minimum. The two tax lots created out of tax lot 901 share 15' of
edmurphy/fineview/response/9/19/03 1
� Finevi�w pm�titions
frontage, and the two tax lots created from tax lot 1000 share 15' of frontage. As
illustrated on the attached pages (Attachment 1 and 2), Parcel 1 of MLP 2003-
00011 will have an access easement over Parcel 2. That's why Parcel 2 shows both
a gross and a net square footage. Similarly, Parcel 2 of MLP 2003-00012 will have
an access easement over Parcel i. Again, that's why Parcel 1 shows both a gross
and a net square footage. Technically, unless there were private restrictions
prohibiting it, the owners could construct a fence or concrete barrier down the
center of the two 10'-wide shared driveways.
To ensure that both sets of two parcels will have the right to use the other half of
the 20'-wide paved area, the applicant plans to record additional instruments
granting that right. Each lot will then not only meet the minimum requirements,
but in addition, have the right to use their neighbors' 10'-wide driveway. It is
important to note that the applicant does not have to establish these additional
easements in order to meet the City's access requirements; each partition meets
the minimum access requirements without the use of their neighbor's 10'-wide
driveway.
We did not create a private street. Although the staff report uses that term in the
staff report, staff also uses the terms "shared flag lot driveway" and "access drive".
Perhaps my mention of"cross easements" in the supplemental information dated
September 8, 2003 was confusing, as that terminology was not used in the
application that was approved in 2001 (which was, of course, exactly the same
design). In my opinion, granting each owner an additional right to use a portion of
their neighbors' driveway, as well as their own legal access, does not somehow turn
the shared driveways into a private street.
Fire apparatus turn-around.
A condition of approval for MLP 2003-00012 requires a fire apparatus turnaround.
Actually, the staff report requirement for a fire apparatus turn around is confusing.
The condition of approval clearly states that it is required. But the staff report
states on page 7 "Tualatin Fire and Rescue did not indicate that the access to the
edmurphylfineview/response/9/19/03 2
Fineview partirions
site is in any way hazardous or constitute a ciear and present danger." Page 8 says
"the applicant is to provide a fire apparatus turnaround..." Yet on Page 16,
paragraph 1 it states in bold letters "no turnaround will be required for fire
apparatus".)
The proposed paved area of the shared driveways is shown on the construction
drawings, as well as on the Tree Preservation Plan. The paved area is less than
150' in length from SW 90`h Avenue. Therefore, no fire apparatus turn-around
should be required.
Apparently, staff was looking at the partition plan, and added the dimensions of
100' and 57' shown on the plan. That little line at the end of the flagpole for Parcel
1 notes where the easement area would end for Parcel 2. The line is drawn 150'
following the southern lot line of parcel i, and 162' following the northern lot line of
parcel 1. The simple solution is to move that line a few feet closer to SW 90tn
Avenue, so that it is no more than 150' in length measured along the northern
property line. Instead of 57', it would be no more than 45'. (It could even be
moved to 34', which would be consistent with the proposed pavement area, as per
the attached drawing, Attachment 3).
Building a fire apparatus turnaround as a condition of approval for MLP 2003-00012
is not feasible. It would require a 40' long, 20' wide extension of the shared
driveway into the adjacent property, tax lot 901 (i.e., Parcel 2 of MLP 2003-00011),
and another 40' long, 20' wide leg extending to the south (Parcel 2 of MLP 2003-
00012). This is shown on the attached diagram (Attachment 4). It doesn't seem
physically possible to provide a fire apparatus turnaround just on MLP 2002-00012.
Tree Plan.
We submitted a tree plan in both the applications, including a drawing (Sheet 1,
last page in the applications) and an analysis by Walter Knapp, completed in June
2001. Note that in the plan, it assumes the removal of the six fir trees, and
concludes that no mitigation is required because 78% of the trees over 12" in
edmurphylfineview/response/9/19/03 3
' , Fineview partitions
diameter are being retained. Submitting a tree plan was a condition of the 2001
approval, and the tree plan was subsequently completed.
Proposal.
The conditions of approval for these two partitions are not really workable as
written. Here are my recommendations, which will result in a paved area like the
one shown in the construction drawings, plus an added sidewalk along one side of
one of the flagpoles.
■ Delete the requirement for a fire apparatus turnaround as a condition of
approval for MLP 2003-00012. Instead, the final plat will show the lot line as
per the attached drawing (Attachment 5), so the shared driveway easement
across the flag pole of Parcel i for Parcel 2, measured along the northern
property line of parcel 1, will measure no more than 150 feet in length.
■ Instead of requiring street trees along both sides of the two driveways, let the
developer plant 10 new trees on the four lots, in an area where they will have a
better chance of survival, and where they will provide more benefit to the future
owners.
■ Delete the requirement for "NO PARKING - FIRE LANE - TOW AWAY ZONE, ORS
98.810 -98.812" signs on posts, with a 7' clear space above grade level to the
bottom of the sign. This is not a fire apparatus access road. It is two private
shared driveways.
�■ Delete the requirement for a tree plan, as one has already been submitted.
Alternative proposal.
As I suggested in my fax memo to you dated September 12, we would like to
explore methods of saving some or all of the six fir trees. In that memo, I said that
the developer is open to the idea if the idea does not slow down or otherwise cause
problems with their approval of these partitions. Given the City standards and the
lot configurations, this may not be possible. It would result in a paved area
different than the one shown in the construction drawings, but the partition plats
would remain the same. Here again is the idea:
edmurphy/fineview/response/9/19/03 4
Fineview pm-titions � �
■ In lieu of new street trees, allow the developer to retain as many of the existing
fir trees, which range in size from 20" to 34" diameter, as possible - perhaps all
six of them. These trees are big enough to count as street trees both sides of
the shared driveways.
■ To retain those fir trees, allow the applicant to move the 20'-wide paved area
almost up to the north property line, leaving just enough room for the fence.
■ Eliminate the requirement for a sidewalk altogether. Or if a sidewalk is required,
at least reduce the sidewalk to 36" wide. This will allow the developer to
squeeze it in between the south property line of tax lot 1001 and the fir trees,
and minimize damage to the trees.
Thank you for your consideration of these comments.
Ed Murph
edmurphy/fineview/response/9/19/03 5
. �� . ' .
�• . . � . i � � i i ��'ac�,w�en} 1
i �--- -----� � i—.---
� � TL 904 � � I �
I I
j � I � � I
I I � � I
. i w � i r----------L—_-
z � i
� Q I �------.---1—� ----------- TL 805
i � � �
� _ � TL 902 � TL 905 �
I �' I I I
� � � � � �-
� � � � ,
�
� � i l------- -- i
� TL 100 j � TL 9ff1' `j0(o TL �-998 R�I � ----------�
I I
� l /' TL 800 �
� � � .L-
I � � /�
� I
----J � � . '
---- � ...- - - ....,/
'�E STREET -' �
+ U 1OS' f
100' ry� ddd
--------� � TL 1001 s�• TL �394 � f..
� I �. 61' Parcel 1 �.'. `.
� I �Sew�e-�t oJe✓ Net: �,933 sq.ft. �� .' ��. � .
I �� Gross: 11.,297 sq.ft. p ' • �
ti ��
� � �'a✓�ce l I -Io+- f�a►��{� z 's�\ �/ �-,;`�. .' �'� `�
� , � � . . .' .
TL 100 � � '�.� � �� �.` .
�---------- � Parcel 2 `� �': .. •�.
,���. .. . y��.
� ,+•. . . _ _ .. . ,
10,094 sq.ff. .• g ,
� � i �y5 .�. Sa� W + . .. W �. .� �•.
� ����� . �� ` . � : . .� ;,-.'
� j TL 1002 '►�� � ,.•,'� ��� •� r.�'' � +`.� �ye
jI y /.'�... '.'. '.`' •��.
I � . � :` . . . ''���
( � �---------- 43' , 82' ` �i , �-
I ��. C
� � • .� �\��
• � � TL 1101 '�j �
1 �._ m�; ��
( � � � + ��. Q�� /�
I
I . .
� � ---------- ------------ ��• V Q-�P ��/
� . r _ r • i
I � �
� j TL 1102 I TL 1100 � TL 401 ��
� I � � �i� �i� TL
I
I I i i
I I I �� � i�
� � � �i �
----- ----� L----------�-----� � ---� -------
- _. i �
-- � � � -----
------� �------------�-------fi-------1--
� i i ,i � �
. � •� � i �����Qtil z . I ,
I �
• � l---------� � I---
� � I
I � TL 904 i � I T�
1
� I � � i � I
I I � I
. I w I � � � --�
' Z I i i------- L--
I > � �---------1--� __------ I TL 805
� Q i �---- -�
I = � TL 902 � TL 905 �
, � , � ; r
, � � �
i � � � � i
' � i I---------
i ,3�� -----------�
TL 100 � ( � TL 98fiq46 TL �@9�' 9° l �� I
I I � Parce! 1 TL 800 �
� 50' o, 7,764 sq.it. ��y5�/ �
� �: , L
I I faspw�cw�o�e� o
� I �C(�'C(I Z t�✓ �/
-——`———— — � � � Par'cet 1 45 � Parce! 2 .
— — � Net: 8,222 sq.ft.
IAPLE STREET � 8e �05' i� Gross: 10,0�4 sQ.ft. �
�
— -- �
S) ry0
6�, TL �3A�- l000
--- ------ � � TL 1001 ���. �
� � ,
� � ` ��v'� �
'� i
.,\ f
I 50• I f'
�- i '�
I I �. ,�
TL 100 j � ------ ` � ��
� }---- �/
� I � �.
I
� j TL 1002 �
I � /
I 4 �
I �__
� � ' ------- --
I • � ,
�
. j I TL 1101 Q`P
I i p��0
� � �0
�
I I � ------------ �P /�i
ir----------� SoP �,
�
� j TL 1102 I TL 1100 � TL 4�1 ��
- . � � i �
� � � I i� i�
1
� � i i
_ i � � /�i /�i
� � I � -- --�
i
-----------J L----=-----�---- � /r-------
_ _
� �------- ----
----------� �----- ------/� f-�--- T----
i i � -� � �
; , , /w ���H� 3
` '� ` —���C_�p-- -----�— �- - - - - - - - -� ��� F� PL-8
� � -�`A
TA901 T � L; 99-17—P1
� �:;� L - - - -
-=� - - - - �
, O •�u,����V AP-8
' O :,w��<�
i
� � O.,
�,;� �
r. �--
-.. ..:]�-----�-.[_) -..---- -.__ C1-..---- -- f� ----[�------❑ _p
-- _ -- --- --- ,�. _ �
� I
-- io�' I
',tip.i � I-26 I
,
FI-34
' � . � �
�e ❑ ' _. U—�-i�--- ❑- ❑---�J� � FI-26
i � ' - - _ _ ivd' 20 -�r- I-20- - - ,
�� ._ . _ — _ _ _ _— � , �y.
-=_ --- � �- �
� --- -}� -� -- -_ � - -
.� _
.
� , - �-,, ,�, �,,
� ,
; � , . .
, , . . .
i � � � - J i \�, �`,
i � ,.,.
_ _ _ �-----� C---� � �\\: :;..
. I - - � � � . �
� TAX LOT I ,� �
� � 1001 I I '����
� � '� : �
� � _s,
- - - - W ,�y .
� I DEC-28 � AP-22
_. — — � � ���
I �_ _j - - '
i ----------- --------------------- �
; �; � i
- - _ __. _ . -�. �
_ ---J
- 99-18—P2
�
CH-12
_i _ ��'`��;� DEAD)
�::
I ~ �`�•
TAX LOT
1002
� — -- — — — — — — —L _ �1�u un iM�h 1 y I .
�
I � — — — — — — — — — — — �
� TL902 I � .
� �� TL 9 0 5
I �
I � , �
� - � I
�- - - - - - -- - _
� Q � � —
� TL � `�' TL �A=�B- �a � ,
I �
I ,
� �
I .
I ,
I '
_ _ _ --�
._.__.. ..�... . ____. _ . _ . �. ^. ...._._ ^. ___..�.�. ___... �, fi
, � - _ �o_,� �.
-1 105' '
t
s�1_... . �. ...._....�.�.�1.._. ._... ._.._. ._-....._...-.1, /,, ..�...r:i.
. ,
� 60� ' �b
� TL 10 01 ; S��
`� TL
i
I ` � . 6�' Parce/ 1
I � �
� � Ne t: 8, 933 sq. �:
�_.._. . �.
( �--�o�--�
� Gross: 11,29 7 .�q. f
I �s �
i �
� -�c� �oao .�
� � � .
� . �.
� - - - - - - - _ _ "
Parcel 2
,
� 10, 094 sq. ft r ,
��
, /
TL 1002 . , � � � W
,
. .� � �
,
� .i W �
- s� � � f{j�A�i►tt/1f S I
' • • j �— ----- � � i—.--
I I . � I
( � TL 904 i � I TL
I �
I I � � i I
I I � I �
I I � � �
I w I , � r---------
� � � i � � L--
� w � ---------1--� � TL 805
i Q � � �------------�
� � i TL 902 � TL 905 �
I �
� � � � ' �
� � ' ' ' � ;
� � i �---------
T� 100 � - • ------------�
I j TL 901 TL 1000 �
� I � / TL 800 �
� � � L
I I . �_ .
� I � /
� I
----------� � � --�— - - ......,�
4PLE STREET '
'_ _ U 1OS' N
100' �YS� ry0
TL 1301
---------� � TL 1001 f'�:
� � `t 6'� Porce! 1 j�� .
� I Ne t: 8,933 sq.ft. ��
�.-
� � � cross: t 1,2s7 sq.ft. ,yo ' �• �
, , �sa ,/ �..!- . .
� � \ , ��� . ` ` . .
� ' . . ` . . "'
I U \ � .
TL 100 � �--------- � Parce( 2 � �.� - � � � Y
,��. .. �. . ' �J.
� I 10,094 sq.ft. � .••�- �oy� ` � ` � ' �'+"j
I I I � /���+ ♦ y♦ ` ♦.` Y + ;.
I V ♦ V ��.. 1
'.• ♦ V
� � TL 1002 ti� • • - � Vy � �
( '� . . . . � r"-..�•'
.. �
I � �� �'./+ �•+ � `r�` � /
� 43� 82' � ' �i
� � �---------- .�' --
� .
�
'I \
� I TL 1101 '� 4'P
I I.. �.; �0
I � � � ' p�
. '
I � p �
' V
� I i , `„ �P� /�/
I ---------- �� P ,
i r----------�--- �
� j TL 1102 I TL 1100 � TL 401 ��
. � I � � i i
I � � ��/ ��/
I �
I � � �/ �/
� � i i
------- ---J L----------�------�� �------ - -----
i �
_ ' -� -----------!-------t�--------r----
_ --------� �-- ,� ,� I I
l i
S�,ap ! ] 0✓• 02: OOp Mur�^tiy 5039681674 p. 1
� r � � , •
FAX TRANSMITTAL MEMO
To: City of Tigard, Planning 1 ��Dp�
AnN: Matt Scheidegger ���' � OD 1 l
Fax#: 503-6$4-7297
Date: 9/12/03
RE; Fineview partitions
MESSAGE: Hi Matt. I left a voice mail for you yesterday regarding
the possible sidewalk requirement, and the impact on the mature fir trees on
tax Iot '1000'. (I am having some difficulty understanding how the City can
process the two Fineview applications as separate partitions -- like it did in
May of 2000 -- and at the same time now require a sidewafk, as if it is a four-
lot subdivision with a private street. My understanding is that, if the two
partitions came in separately in time, the City would not require a sidewalk of
either partition. So, to me, it seems unjusti�ed by the Code, and unnecessary
from a practical standpoint. But, be that as it may...)
Before you and Kim said that you might require a sidewalk, I was
exploring with the applicants the idea of pushing the shared driveway to the
north property line oF tax lot '901' in order to save at least the large 34" fir
tree, and maybe some of the other five fir trees as well. With the requirement
of a 5' sidewalk, that does not appear to be possible.
However, if the City is flexible on the width of the sidewalk, I think
there may be a way to place it along the south property line of tax 1ot '1000'.
If the shared driveway was then constructed along the north property line of
tax lot `901', it would leave a 6'-wide space for the trees. This is illustrated on
the attached drawing. Around the 34" diameter tree and perhaps some of the
others, the sidewalk would have to be narrower -- probably 36" wide. (I also
thi�k the paved turn-around area could be built around the trees, as shown).
The applicants are receptive to the idea of saving the fir trees, if the
idea does not slow down or othe�wise cause problems with their approval of
these partitions. My suggestion to you is, if you decide you are going to
require a sidewalk along one side of the shared driveway, at least write the
condition so as to give the owne�s flexibility on the width of the sidewalk.
That way, they can try and squeeze it in between the south property line and
the trees, and hopefully preserve many of these trees. (See T�C
18.810.03�.A.7). Thanks Matt.
cc. Dan Boyden
•Phane 503• �24-4625 ■Fax 503.968.i6�¢ �ejmurphy@aol.com
<<...:,,.:
• � .
•
�� i
, �i.N'�� . �
, S� �
.:s���F.�
, ., •
...�"
; , .
r � • ��,
. . . _
_ . _ ___. _ ------ .. .----.,.,,_._.� _ — - -
. . .. ., .. � , '+C,i ' . ��JY';r ?� i . � 1 !
. . x S`3 ''F',_"�'f.a r'3va�!^ F r.w �r r-'7r-,�. r+y�,a`+�✓6 �7 ��.r 'e'a."C ._ .
zs�s ,;� : r _ ,r„- a� . a : � r .
_.,.;ti F{�.,..t,.,�,...... ',,,�,,�s �ax��.,�..�e�..i?^.'°.�S'T'rxbe r�'s°•�yY""'.,�°A"'0.*" � , . : � /�� �`C�.ys�
• � ,~�bF�r�F���k�- MY f.er°'!9'F� �.�]Y3' i"i�,i�y` �.�a�� 1��� 1 .-�. f�����'R'""'"'i Y � � .
Z � / 7' �'OA"L tPa �r=./,5+. ^ :yT� F��is!�.£t� +P/1:�-rYlR.A2W�8�aR�c^'. A '
. ^ -.+?, . .• -�� a\,,�.�' 'r� '- . . ! �, `�1�/��� '`•r-�i �t �\ ��!(:' ` �
� �I. � � •' , ,��/�/��`� ����/i�� /
j"�r ' Pr: � ,/�`� ����'!� /�� � ��`\` �/ll�•'���
(��'�1=�.I:�i�r�►���'L���♦ ���1� ��I��`�� ►.� ��� ��L•'�.V'���C'� -i� :
k��•!•_�'�:�:.��►v�'u�:9.�i=10•�l���<.t�L�/a�JO.����!���.V'�:f���.A`���:"�1� , • ..�.� '- �
.+.
• � ' ' , <
�! ' �
�� ,
. � i - ,.
i _ _ .... . _. . `
`
.
M1'�.'.I
�
��� �
' `., •�
•
i.
. �'/i.. _ .+)•. �
/ 1 - .
:1. ��.y'..✓y�-�!
, {��� � � •
•
Sep O1 03 03: 36p Murphy 5039681674 p. l
,� .
r � � �
. � � .
FAX TRANSMITTAL MEMO
To: City of Tigard, Planning
ATTN: Matt Scheidegger
FAx #: 503-684-7297
DATE: 9/2/03
RE: Fineview partitions -- impact study
MESSAGE: Hi Matt. As you requested, enclosed are impact studies
� for the two Fineview partitions. These should satisfy the requirements of TDC
18.390.040.e. Please contact me if you need anything else. Thanks Matt.
cc. Dan Boyden
■Ph�ne So�. 624-¢625 �Fax 503.968.i674 Iejmurphy@aol.com
Sep O1 03 03: 36p Murphy 5039681674 p. 2
Pinev iew-A�LP 2W3-00011
SUPPLEMENTAL TO FINEVIEW PARTITION#1 APPLICATTON, MLP 2003-OOQ11
Section 18.390.040 of the Tigard Development Code requires an tmpact
study.
e. Include an impact study.The impact study sha11 quantify the effecl vf the developmenl on
public faciiities and services.The study shali address,at a minimwm,the transportation
system,including bikeways,the drainage system,the parks system,the water system, the
sewer system,and the noise impacts of the develc�ment_ For each public fzcility system and
type of impact,the sEUdy shall propose improvements necessary to meet City stattdards and to
mimmize the impact of the development on the puh(ic at large, public facilities systems,and
affectcd private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code
requires the dedication of rea!property interests, the applicant shall either specificafly cor�cur
w�tt� the dedication requirements,or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the
real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of
the development.
Impact Analysis.
i. Trans ortation s stem. There are just under 10 trips per day
generated from a single-Family detached home. There will be two homes
built on this property as a result of this partition, which will add almost 20
trips per day ani:o SW 9Qt'' Avenue, a focai street and other streets such as
SW Locust, a collector street. No new streets will be created. This amount
of traffic on the existing streets would not be considered signi�cartt, or
degrade the fevel of service on the srreet. There is nothing in the
Transportation System plan indicating a capacity problem in this area. (The
closest recomrnended improvements are improvements to the intersection of
SW Hall and SW Oak, widening of SW Hall to five lanes, and widening of SW
Greenburg north of SW l.ocust to five ianes). No dedication of right-of-way is
necessary, according to the City Engineer.
SW Half� which is only about 1300 feet away from this development, is a
transit route.
There are no bicycle lanes on SW 90�' Avenue, or on any o� the nearby
streets. No bikeways are identified on the pedestrian/bikeway plan through
this property. The amount of bicycie traffic that will be generated from the
two new homes is not significant.
The new homes will cantribute to the funds available for system-wide
improvernents through payment of the Transportation Improvemenfi Fee
(TIF).
2. r � e. The property drains to the east and the south, towards the
wetland area. Drainage from the shared driveway will be piped to the edge
of the wetland through a 12" concrete pipe, and then released into a riprap
pad. The site plan will accommodate the upstream drainage adjacent to this
development. The partition will not significantly increase the amount of
runoff into the public system. Clean Water Services has already provided a
P`im��nihv,4aattr•i a{ncl fi novi o.u�@ 1!ci inn/Q/(19!(1� ,
Sep �01 03 03: 36p Murphy 5039681674 p. 3
• , . .
Fineview—MLP 2W3-C10011
service letter, accepting the proposed drainage system. The new homes will
contribute to tlie funds available for system-wide improvements through
payment oF the water quality Fee (in-lieu-o�.
3• Parks• There will be some use of nearby parks, such as Metzger Park.
Residents may also use the schooi grounds during non-school hours. The
new homes will contribute to the funds available for system-wide park
improvements tf�rough payment of the Parks SDC.
4• Water. Tl�e water system has the capacity to serve this development.
There are two public water lines available in SW 90"' Avenue, a 16" line and a
6" line. There wiil be no significant impact to the water system as a result of
this two-lot development. The new homes will contribute to the funds
available for system-wide improvements through payment of the Water SDC.
5. Sewer. Tfte sewer system has the capacity to serve this devefopment.
There is an existing sewer main in SW 90`h Avenue. There will be no
significant impact to the sewer system as a result of this two-lot
development. The new homes will contribute to the funds avaiiable for
system-wide improvements through payment of the Sewer SDC.
6. Noise. There will be construction-related noise generated during
constru�tion of the driveway and utilities, and then the homes. After
construction, there will be no sigrtifican�noise impact on the neiqhborhood.
�°�Imnmhvkracari a rPClfi nNV;nw at i la���n/9!l1��(ri
7
� �
' , Page 1 of 1
Matt Scheidegger- Fineview partitions
From: <Ejmurphy a,aol.com>
'To: <MATTS u)ci.tigard.or.us>,<dboyden@gorge.net>
Date: 9/30/03 5:43 PM
Subject: Fineview partitions
Hi Matt. This e-mail is to confirm our phone conversation earlier this
afternoon regarding clarification of the conditions of approval for MLP 2003-0001 I
and MLP 200 3-000 1 2. 1 understood you to say that the statements I made in my / � ^�� �
memo to you dated September 25,2003,is an accurate representation of what we /j/�� �,..�
agreed to at our meeting of September 24 with you and Kim McMillan. Further, � �
you plan to write a letter or memo to me verifying that understanding. Your � /
letter or memo clarifying the conditions of approval will then supersede the ,�l� �
conditions of approval as written in the staff decision. v�v
The reason for this e-mail is because the appeal period on MLP 2 003-000 1 1
ended today at 5:00 PM,and the appeal period for MLP 2 003-400 1 2 ends tomorrow at
5:00 PM. We did not want to let the appeal period pass without some
confirmation of the changes or claritications we agreed to at our meeting.
Thanks Matt.
Ed Murphy
503-624-4625
file://C:\WINDOW S\TEMP\GW}00002.HTM 10/2/03
�
Sep 24 03 03: 04p Murahy 50�9681674 p. l
,� .
� �
► ' � •
FAX TRANSMITTAL MEMO - �°�a�►na
��� l�ll�
To: City of Tigard, Plannin
ATT'N: Matt Scheidegger Eo�°
03 ��S
Fax#: 503-684-7297 �t�,�;��'��'�
D�te: 9/ZS/03
RE: Fineview partitions, MLP 2003-00011 and MLP 20Q3-00012
MESSAGE: Hi Matt. Thanks for meeting with Dan Boyden and me
yesterday. I thought the meeting was productive, and resolved the issues I
raised in my memo of September 25, Z003. This memo is to folfow-up on our
discussion yesterday regarding these two partitions. I don't know whether or
not you will have to issue an amended decision, or if this memo wil! suffice for
the record.
MLP 2003-00011
■ The screening that is required along the north property fine of the flag poie
next to tax tot '906' could be a fence or vegetation. If the property owner
of tax lot '906' agrees, a vegetative screen could be placed on that
property, in tt�e space between the retaining wall and the property line.
Otherwise, a 6'-high wood fence will be constructed on the property line.
• Street trees are not required if the developer is instead able to retain all or
most of the six larger fir trees along the south side of the proposed
driveway (within the flag pole area of MLP 2003-00012),
• The tree plan submitted with the appiication is adequate.
■ The developer will construct a sidewalk along the south side of the shared
driveways, in flag pole area of the Parcel 1 created via MLP 2003-OQ012. I'��
• The driveway area will be shifted 4 to 5 feet to the north to the north so ;
that it is adjacent to the property line of tax lot `906', which wiil allow the li
developer to retain the fir trees adjacent to tax lot '1001', li
/Phone So3. 62�}-4625 ■Fax 503.968.1674 ■ejmurphy@aol.com
Sep 24 03 03: 04p Murphy 5n�9681674 p. 2
, �
MLP 2003-000i2
� The s�reening that is required along the south property line of the flag pole
next to tax lot `1001' does not have to be a fence, but could be vegetation.
• New street trees are not requirec! iF the developer instead is able to retain
all or most of the six larger fir trees along the south side of the proposed
driveway.
• The tree pian submitted with the application is adequate.
• The City wi11 not require a fire apparatus turn-around.
• The developer will construct a 42"'wide sidewalk installed along the south
side of the flag pole, meandering as necessary to preserve trees and
shrubs within the 9' - 10' space available.
• The driveway area will be shiFted 4 to 5 feet to the north to the north so
that it is adjacent to the property line of tax lot`906', which will allow the
developer to retain the fir trees.
Again, thank-you for working with us on these partitions. We appreciate the
flexibility and responsiveness shown by you ancE Kim.
cc. Dick Bewersdorf'F, Planning Manager
Kim McMi!lan, Development Review Engineer
Page 2 I
I