MLP2003-00012 ,
� � 1
•
NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION
' MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2003-00012
CITY OF TIGARD
FINEVIEW FARM LLC PARTITION Community I�evefopment
� SFnpingA Better�ommumty
120 DAYS = 12/312003
SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY
FILE NAME: FINEVIEW FARM, LLC PARTITION
CASE NO: Minor Land Partition (MLP) MLP2003-00012
PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Minor Land Partition approval to partition a parcel of
land within the city limits of Tigard. The parcel is 1.20 acres. The proposal is to
divide the property into finro parcels of 10,094 square feet and 8,933 square feet
with 33,245 square feet in a tract for wetlands. Both parcels will have
approximately 15 feet of frontage along SW 90�' Avenue.
APPLICANT/ Fineview Farm L.L.C. APPLICANT'S REP.: Ed Murphy&Associates
OWNER: Attn: Dan Boyden 9875 SW Murdock Street
1430 Eastside Road Tigard, OR 972224
Hood River, OR 97031
ZONING
DESIGNATION: R-4.5, Low-Density Residential. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to
accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential
units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached
single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses
are also permitted conditionally.
LOCATION: The subject property is located east of SW 90�' Avenue, 330 feet south of SW
Locust Street; WCTM 1S135AA, Tax Lot 1000.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715,
18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
SECTION II. DECISION
Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has
APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the
decision is based are noted in Section V.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00012/FINEVIEW FARM PARTITION PAGE 1 OF 17
r
, ►
4
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT:
u mit to t e anning epartment at ew c ei egger, , ext. or review an
approval:
1. Submit a plan showing proper screening of the access drive from tax lot 1001 according to
Section 18.745.040 of t�ie Tigard Development Code.
2. Record a reciprocal access easement and maintenance agreement and submit a copy to the
City.
3. Submit a plan showing the proposed access drive with street trees planted in accordance with
Section 18.745.040.C.
4. Provide a tree plan,indicating the protection of all trees to remain and mitigation of trees removed
over 12 inches in diameter prepared by a certified arborist.
5. Provide a fire apparatus turnaround in accordance with Section 18.705.030.(I)(4) of the Tigard
Development Code.
Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and
approval:
6. Prior to commencing onsite improvements, a Public Facility Improvement PFI) permit is required
for this�roject to cover the sewer tap and construction and any other wor in the public ri ht-of-
way. Six (6�sets of detailed ublic improvement plans,shall be submitted for review �o the
Engineering, epartment. NO�: these plans are in addition to any drawings reguired by the
Bulding Division and should only include sheets relevant to ublic im rovements. Public Facility
Improvement (PFI) permit plans shall conform to City of �igard �ublic Improvement Design
Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ci.tigard.or.us).
7. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number
of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permittee", and who will
provide the financial assurance for tl�e public imp rovements. For example,.specify if the entity is
a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is
incorporated and rovide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate
information to the�ngineering Department will delay processing of project documents.
8. Prior to final plat approval the applicant shall construct sidewalks along at least one side of the
private street.
9. Prior to final lat a� pproval, the applicant shall ay an addressing fee in the amount of $60.00.
(STAFF CON�ACT: Shirley Treat, Engineering�
10. The applicant shall execute a Restrictive Covenant whereby they agree to complete or participate
in the future improvements of SW 90th Avenue adjacent to the sub�ect property, when any ot the
following events occur:
A. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for by the
formation of a Local Improvement District,
B. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for in whole or in
part by the City or other public agency,
C. when the improvements are par� of a larger project to be constructed by a third party and
involves the sharing of design and/or construction expenses by the third party owner(s) of
property in addition to the subject property, or
D. when construction of the improvements is deemed to be appropriate by the City Engineer
in conjunction with construction of improvements by others adjacent to the subject site.
11. The final plat shall show the dedication of right-of-way (ROW) on 90th Avenue to provide 27 feet
from centerline.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00012/FINEVIEW FARM PARTITION PAGE 2 OF 17
, �
12. The applicant shall cause a statement to be placed on the final plat to indicate that the proposed
private street(s)will be jointly owned and maintained by the private property owners who abut and
take access from it (them).
13. The applicanYs plan shall show a public sewer extension from SW 90th Avenue to the proposed
development.
14. The ap p.licant,shall obtain approval from the Tualatin Valley Water District for the proposed water
connec�lon pnor to issuance of the City's Public Facility Improvement permit.
15. The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to
the City's global posifioning system (GPS) geodetic control network (GC 22}. These monuments
shall be on the same line and shall be of tfie same �recision as required for the subdivision plat
boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground
measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates
can be establishedby:
. GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey.
. By random traverse using conventional surveying methods.
16. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements:
A. Submit for City review four (4) paper copies of the final plat prepared by a land surveyor
licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative.
B. Attach a check in the amount of the current final plat review fee (Contact
Planning/En�ineering Permit Technicians, at (503) 639-4171, ext. 2421).
C. The final pla and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by
the Oregon Revised Statutes (OF�S 92.05), Washington County, and by the City of Tigard.
D. The right-of-way dedication for 90 Avenue shall be made on the final plat.
E. NOT� Washington County will not begin their review of the final plat until they receive
notice from the Engineering Department indicating that the City has reviewed the final plat
and submitted comments to the applicanYs surveyor.
F. After the City and County have reviewed the final plat, submit two mylar copies of the final
plat for City Engineer signature (for partitions), or City Engineer and Community
Development Director signatures (for subdivisions).
17. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant's�professional engineer shall provide a sight distance
certification for the proposed access onto SW 90th Avenue.
18. The applicant's construction drawin s shall show that the pavement and rock section for the
proposed private street(s) shall meet�he City's public street sfandard for a local residential street.
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION:
u mit o t e ngineering epartment im c i an, , ext. or review an
approval:
19. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with
a "photomylar" copy of the recorded final pfat.
20. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of
the public improvements as follows: 1) 3 mil mylar, 2) a diskette of the as-builts in "DWG" format
if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable, and 3) the as-built drawings shall be tied to the
City's GPS network. The applicant's eng ineer shall provide the City with an electronic file with
points for each structure (manholes catch basins, wafer valves, hydrants and other water system
features) m the development, and their respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates, referenced
to NAD 83 (91).
21. Any necessary off-site utility easements shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain and
shall be submitted to and accepted by the City prior to issuance ofa building permit.
22. The a�plicant shall provide signage at the entrance of each shared flag lot driveway or private
street hat lists the addresses tTiat are served by the given driveway or street.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00012/FINEVIEW FARM PARTITION PAGE 3 OF 17
23. The applicant shall either place the existin overhead utility lines along SW 90th Avenue
underground as a part of this project, or they s�all pay the fee in-lieu of undergroundin The fee
shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will�e $27.50
per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $412.50 and it shall be paid prior to
issuance of building permifs.
24. Prior to issuance of the building permit for Parcels 1 & 2, the applicant shall pay the standard
water quality and water quantity fees per lot (fee amounts will be the latest approved by Clean
Water Services (CWS).
25. The 25-foot undisturbed buffer shall be shown on the construction plans. The sensitive area
boundary and/or buffer shall be staked in the field throughout the construction process in order to
protect the sensitive area.
THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN (18)
MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION NOTED UNDER
THE PROCESS AND APPEAL SECTION OF THIS DECISION.
SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Pro ert Histo :
e su �ect parcel is located within the City of Tigard. The property is designated Low-Density
Residential on the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. A land use application ad�usting lotlines to increase tax
lot 1000 from 4,455 square feet to 52,272 square feet was approved in December of 1999. A minor land
partition application was also applied for and approved in 1999. However, the minor land partition
approval expired. No other land use applications were found to be on file in the City's records.
Site Information and Proposal Descriptions
The applicant is requesting Minor Land Partition approval to partition a parcel of land within the city limits
of Tigard. The parcel is 1.20 acres. The proposal is to divide the property into two parcels of 10,094
square feet and 8,933 square feet with 33,245 square feet in a tract for wetlands. Both parcels will have
approximately 15 feet of frontage along SW 90�' Avenue.
SECTION IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments were received.
SECTION V. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Land Partitions (18.420):
The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations;
The proposed partition will comply with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations at the
time of proposed development as demonstrated both by the analysis presented within this administrative
decision and by this application and review process through compliance with the conditions of approval.
Therefore, this criterion is met.
There are adequate public facilities available to serve the proposal;
Public facilities are discussed in detail later in this decision under Chapter 18.810 (Street & Utility
Improvement Standards). Based on the analysis provided herein, Staff finds that adequate public
facilities are available to serve the proposal. Therefore, this criterion is met.
All proposed improvements meet City and applicable agency standards;
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00012/FINEVIEW FARM PARTITION PAGE 4 OF 17
The public facilities and proposed improvements are discussed and conditioned later in this decision
under Chapter 18.810 (Street & Utility Improvement Standards). Improvements will be reviewed as part
of the permit process and during construction, at which time the appropriate review authority will ensure
that City and applicable agency standards are met. Based on the analysis in this decision, Staff finds
that this criterion is met.
All proposed lots conform to the specific requirements below:
The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable
zoning district.
The minimum lot width requirement in the R-4.5 zoning district is 50 feet. The proposed partition creates
two lots that are an average of 85 feet wide. Therefore, this criterion is satisfied.
The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot, the
accessway may not be included in the lot area.
The minimum lot area requirement in the R-4.5 zoning district is 7,500 square feet. The proposed lots
are 8,933 and 10,094 square feet. The lots are flag lots and do not include the accessway as part of the
total square footage. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied.
Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet
or have a legally recorcled minimum 15 foot wide access easement.
The proposed partition shows both lots having 15 feet of access onto SW 90�' Avenue through a private
drive. However, the applicant has indicated that the parcels will share an additional 15-foot access to
the north through cross-over easements. Therefore, the proposed parcels will have 30 feet of frontage
onto SW 90th Avenue. This standard has been met.
Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district.
No development is proposed in conjunction with this application. Setback requirements will be applied at
time of development. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied.
When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard,
provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to
maximize separation from existing structures.
No development is associated with this application. Therefore, this standard can be deferred until the
time of development.
A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an
accessway is located within ten feet of an a6utting lot in accordance with Sections 18.745.040.
Screening may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable
outdoor recreation areas for proposed development.
The proposed access drive is within 10 feet of tax lot 1001 to the south. No screening has been
proposed. Therefore, a plan showing tax lot 1001 properly screened according to Section 18.745.040
will be conditioned.
The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway
would have a detrimental effect on fire-fighting capabilities.
The Fire District has no conflicts with the partition as proposed. This criterion will apply only when
structures are developed on the vacant parcels.
Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one lot, a reciprocal easement
which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition
map.
The access drive associated with this application serves both of the proposed lots. By combining the
access with the abutting access drive of MLP2003-00011, to the north, �oint access easements and
maintenance rights will need to be established by the applicant.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP20D3-00012/FINEVIEW FARM PARTITION PAGE 5 OF 17
Any access way shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.705, Access, Egress and
Circulation.
This standard is addressed in greater detail under Chapter 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation)
below.
Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the one-hundred year
floodplain, the city shall rec�uire consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for
greenway ad�oining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable
elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance
with the adopted pedestrianlbicycle pathway plan.
The sub1�ect site is not located within or adjacent to the 100-year floodplain. Therefore, this standard
does not apply.
An application for a variance to the standards prescribed in this chapter shall be made in
accordance with Chapter 18.370, Variances and Adjustments. The applications for the partition
and variance(s)/adjustment(s) will be processed concurrently.
No variances or adjustments are associated with this application.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff can not confirm that the Land Partition standards have
been satisfied, however, if the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the
standards will be met:
CONDITIONS:
. Submit a plan showing proper screening of the access drive from tax lot 1001
according to Section 18.745.040 of the Tigard Development Code.
. Record a reciprocal access easement and maintenance agreement and submit a
copy to the City.
Residential Zonin Districts 18.510:
eve opmen s an ar s in resi en ial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.510.2 below:
TABLE 18.510.2
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES
STANDARD R-�.5
Minimum Lot Size
-Detached unit 7,500 sq.ft.
-Duplexes 10,000 sq.ft.
-Attached unit 1
Average Minimum Lot Width
-Detached unit lots 50 ft.
-Duplex lots 90 ft.
-Attached unit lots
Maximum Lot Covera e -
Minimum Setbacks
-Front yard 20 ft.
-5ide facing street on
comer 8�through lots 15 ft.
-Side yard 5 ft.
-Rear yard 15 ft.
-Side or rear yard abutting more
restrictive zoning district
-Distance beiween property line
and front of ara e 20 ft.
Mawmum Hei ht 30 ft.
Minimum Landsca e Re uirement -
[1]Single-family attached residential units permitted at one dwelling per lot with no more that five attached units in one grouping.
[2]Lot coverage inGudes all buildings and impervious surfaces.
The above standards are deferred until time of development.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00012/FINEVIEW FARM PARTITION PAGE 6 OF 17
Access, Eqress and Circulation (18.705):
Continuing obli�ation of property owner. The provisions and maintenance of access and e ress
stipulated in this title are continuing requirements or the use of any structure or parcel o� real
property in the City.
Access Plan requirements. No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are
presented an approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and
circulation requirements are {o be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director
shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement.
The applicant has indicated that access will be shared with the two newly created parcels of
MLP2003-00011 (Pacific Crest Partners Partition). Therefore, four parcels will be using the same
access through crossover and access easements. The access is proposed,to be 30 feet with 20 feet of
pavement, wfiich connects to SW 90th Avenue. This standard has been satisfied.
Joint Access. Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize
jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses,
structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title,
provided: Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases
or contracts to establish the joint use• and copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts
are placed on permanent file with the �ity.
The pro osed parcels will share access. The applicant has been conditioned earlier under Chapter
18.420 �Land Partitions} to provide documentation that establishes access and maintenance rights for
the individual parcels. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied.
Public street access. All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and
18.705.0301 shall connect directly with a public or private street approve by the City for public
use and sha�l be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis.
The proposed parcels will have access onto SW 90th Avenue by means of a 30-foot access drive with
20 feet of pavement. The applicant has been conditioned under Chapter 18.420 (Land Partitions) to
show satisfactory evidence that each parcel has the legal right to use the existing access. Therefore,
this standard has been satisfied.
Inadequate or hazardous access. Applications for building permits shall be referred to the
Commission for review when, in the opinion of the Director, tl�e access proposed: Would cause
or increase existing hazardous tra�c conditions; or would provide inadequate access for
emerg ency vehicles; or would in any other way cause hazardous conditions to exist which
would constitute a clear and present danger to the public health, safety, and .general welfare.
Direct individual access to arterial or collector streets from single-family dwellings and duplex
lots shall be discouraged. Direct access to major collector or arterial streets shall be considered
only if there is no practical alternative way to access the site. In no case shall the design of the
service drive or drives require or facilitate the backward movement or other maneuvering of a
vehicle within a street, other than an alley. Single-family and duplex dwellings are exempt from
this requirement.
The proposed lots will take access from a private drive that connects to SW 90th Avenue which is a local
street. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue did not indicate that the access to the site is in any way
hazardous or constitute a clear and present danger. Therefore, this standard does not apply.
Access Manaqement (Section 18.705.030.H)
�fion . . s a es a an access report shall be submitted with all new development
proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking
needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washing#on County, the City
and AASHTO.
The applicant has indicated in the narrative that vision clearance areas can be met and that sight
distance to the north is currently unobstructed. The applicant's engineer shall provide sight distance
certification for the proposed shared access prior to approval of the final plat.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00012/FINEVIEW FARM PARTITION PAGE 7 OF 17
Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that drivewa�s shall not be permitted to be �laced in the influence
area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where
queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway
setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be150 feet, measured from the right-
of-way line of the intersectin� street to the throat of the proposed drivewa�. The setback may be
�reater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic
impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less
than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the
adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far
from the intersection as possible.
Both Oak and Locust Streets are classified as collector streets. The proposed shared access onto 90th
Avenue is located approximately 310 feet from Locust Street and 450 feet from Oak Street, thereby
meeting this criterion.
Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a
collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall
be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet.
SW 90�' Avenue is classified as a local street; therefore this standard does not apply to the proposed
driveway.
Access drives in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the
turning around of fire apparatus by one of the following: a) A circular, Paved surFace having a
minimum turn radius measured from center point to outside edge of 35 feet; b) A hammerhead-
configured, paved surface with each leg of the hammerhead having a minimum depth of 40 feet
and a minimum width of 20 feet; c) The maximum cross slope of a required turnaround is 5%.
The access drive is approximately 157 feet in len th. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide a
fire apparatus turnaround in accordance with 18.70�.030.(I)(4) of the Tigard Development Code.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds the Access, Egress and Circulation Standards
have been met.
CONDITION: Provide a fire apparatus tumaround in accordance with 18.705.030.(I)(4) of the Tigard
Development Code.
Density Computations (18.715):
Definition of net develo ment area. Net development area, in acres, shall be determined by
su racting e o owing an area s) from the gross acres, which is all of the land included in
the legal description of the property to be developed:
1. All sensitive land areas:
a. Land within the 100-year floodplain;
b. Land or slopes exceeding 25%;
c. Drainage ways; and
d. Wetlands.
2. All land dedicated to the public for park purposes;
3. All land dedicated for public rights-of-way. When actual information is not available, the
followin� formulas may be used:
a. Single-family development: allocate 20% of gross acreage;
b. Multi-family development: allocate 15% of gross acreage.
4. All land proposed for private streets; and
5. A lot of at least the size required by the applicable base zoning district, if an existing
dwelling is to remain on the site.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-000121FINEVIEW FARM PARTITION PAGE S OF 17
Calculatin maximum number of residential units. To calculate the maximum number of
resi en ia uni s per ne acre, ivi e e num er o square feet in the net acres by the minimum
number of square feet required for each lot in the applicable zoning district.
Calculatin minimum number of residential units. As required by Section 18.510.040, the
minimum num er o resi en ia uni s er ne acre shall be calculated by multiplying the
maximum number of units determined in �ubsection B above by 80% (0.8).
The standards for density computation deal with the intensity of residential land uses, usually stated
as the number of housing units per acre. The total square footage of the sub'ect pro erty is 52,272
square feet. However, to determine the net developable area, the square foo�age of �he accessway
�2 355 square feet) is subtracted as it is excluded from the lot area per Tigard-Development Code
TbC) Section 18.120.089 ) along with the existing wetland of 33,245 square feet. This results in a
net developable area of 1�,672 square feet. As the minimum lot size for the R-4.5 zone is 7,500
square feet, the maximum number of residential units is two (2). The minimum number of residential
units is one (1). The applicant is proposing a two (2) lot partition. Therefore, the density for the
subject property has been met.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Density Computation Standards have been met.
Landscapinq and Screeninq (18.745):
Street trees: Section 18.745.040
ec ion . 45.440.A.: All development projects fronting on a public street, private street or a
private driveway more than 100 feet in fength approved after the adoption of this title shall be
required to plant street trees in accordance with the standards in Section 18.745.040C.
The proposed access is approximately 157 feet in length; according to the standard, driveways in
excess of one-hundred (100) feet in length are required to have street trees. Therefore, the applicant is
required to submit a plan showing the proposed access drive with street trees planted in accordance
with Section 18.745.040.C.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Landscaping and Screening Standards have not been
met.
CONDITION: Submit a plan showing the proposed access drive with street trees planted in accordance
with Section 18.745.040.C.
Tree Removal (18.790):
ree p an�4 e�ting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall
be provided for any lot„ parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development
application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development or
conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal wherever possible.
The applicant has not addressed tree mitigation or protection of trees to remain. Therefore, the
applicant is required to provide a tree plan indicating the protection of all trees to remain and
mitigation of trees removed over 12 inches in diameter prepared by a certified arborist.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Landscaping and Screening Standards have not been
met.
CONDITION:Provide a tree lan indicating the protection of all trees to remain and mitigation of trees
removed over �2 inches in diameter prepared by a certified arborist.
Visual Clearance Areas (18.795):
T is apter requires t at a c ear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property
adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private
driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or
temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that
obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight
8 feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight
8 feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a
-foot distance points with a straight line.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00012/FINEVIEW FARM PARTITION PAGE 9 OF 17
The applicant's plans show no obstructions within the visual clearance triangles associated with the
partition.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Staff finds that the Vision Clearance Standards have been
met.
IMPACT STUDY (18.390.040):
}�equires at t e app ic� shall include an impact study. The study shall address, at a
minimum, the transportation system, including bikewa�rs, the drainage system, the parks
system, the water system, the sewer system, and the noise impacts of the development. For
each public facility system and type of impact of the development on the public at large, public
facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community
Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either
specifically concur with the dedication of real property interest, or prov�de evidence which
supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly
proportional to the projected impacts of the development.
The applicant has submitted an Impact Study that addresses the following systems:
Trans ortation S stem:
ere are Just un er trips per day generated from a sin�le-family detached home. There will be two
homes built on this property as a result of this partition, which will add almost 20 trips per day onto SW
90th Avenue, a local street and other streets such as SW Locust, a collector street. No new streets will
be created. This amount of traffic on the existing streets would not be considered significant, or de�rade
the level of service on the street. There is nothing in the Transportation System plan indicating a
capacity problem in this area. (The closest recommended improvements are improvements to the
intersection of SW Hall and SW Oak, widening of SW Hall to five lanes, and widening of SW Greenburg
north of SW Locust to five lanes). No dedication of right-of-way is necessary, accordmg to the City
Engineer.
SW Hall, which is only about 1,300 feet away from this development, is a transit route.
There are no bicycle lanes on SW 90th Avenue, or on any of the nearby streets. No bikeways are
identified on the pedestrian/bikeway plan through this property. The amount of bicycle traffic that will be
generated from tFie two new homes is not significant.
The new homes will contribute to the funds available for system-wide improvements through payment of
the Transportation Improvement Fee (TIF).
Draina e S stem:
e property rains to the east and south, towards the wetland area. Drainage from the shared
driveway wilf be piped to the edge of the wetland through a 12-inch concrete pipe, and then released into
a riprap pad. The site plan will accommodate the upstream drainage adjacent to this development. The
partition will not significantly increase the amount of runoff into the public system. Clean Water Senrices
has already provided a service letter, accepting the proposed drainage system. The new homes will
contribute to the funds available for system-wide improvements through payment of the water quality fee
(in-lieu of).
Park S stem:
ere wi e some use of nearby parks, such as Metzger Park. Residents may also use the school
grounds during non-school hours. The new homes will contribute to the funds available for system-wide
park improvements through payment of the System Development Charge (SDC).
Water S stem:
e water system has the capacity to serve this development. There are two �ublic water lines available
in SW 90th Avenue, a 16-inch line and a 6-inch line. There will be no significant impact to the water
system as a result of this finro-lot development. The new homes will contribute to the funds available for
system-wide improvements through payment of the Sewer SDC.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00012/FINEVIEW FARM PARTITION PAGE 10 OF 17
Sewer S stem:
e sewer system has the capacity to serve this development. There is an existing sewer main in SW
90th Avenue. There will be no significant impact to the sewer system as a result of this two-lot
development. The new homes will contribute to the funds available for system-wide improvements
through payment of the Sewer SDC.
Noise Im acts:
ere wi e construction-related noise generated during construction of the driveway and utilities, and
then the homes. After construction, there will be no significant noise impact on the neighborhood.
Rough Proportionality:
Any required street improvements to certain collector or higher volume streets and the Washington
County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF} are mitigation measures that are required at the time of development.
Basecf on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan
II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development
on the Collector and Arterial Street system. Presently, the TIF for each trip that is generated is $239.00.
The total TIF for a single-family dwelling is $2,390 per unit.
U pon completion of this development, the future builders of the residences will be required to pay TIF's
of approximately $4,780 ($2,390 x 2 single-family dwelling units. Based on the estimate that total TIF
fees cover 32 percent of the impact on ma�or street improvements ci ide, a fee that would cover 100
percent of this projects traffic impact is $14,937 ($4,780 divided by .32�The difference befinreen the TIF
paid and the full impact, is considered an unmitigated impact; Smce the TIF paid is $4,780, the
unmitigated impact can be valued at $10,157. Given that the estimated cost of the dedication is $90.00
($3.00 x 30 square feet), the requirement to make these improvements falls within the limits of
proportionality to the impact of the development.
PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS
Street And Utilitv Improvements Standards (Section 18.810):
a�ter . provi es cons ruc ion s an ar s or t e implementation of public and private
facilities and ut�lities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are
addressed below:
Streets:
Improvements:
Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be
improved in accordance with the TDC standards.
Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion
of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC.
Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a local street to have a
54 right-of-way width and 32-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-
street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage,
and street trees.
This site lies adjacent to SW 90�' Avenue, which is classified as a local street on the City of Tigard
Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 25 feet of ROW from centerline, according
to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate ROW to provide 27 feet from
centerline.
SW 90"' Avenue is cuRently paved, but not fully improved to City standards. In order to mitigate the
impact from this development, the applicant should sign a Restrictive Covenant for future street
improvements.
Future Street Plan and Extension of Streets: Section 18.810.030.F states that a future street plan
shall be filed which shows the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the
boundaries of the proposed land division. This section also states that where it is necessary to
give access or perm�t a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00012/FINEVIEW FARM PARTITION PAGE 11 OF 17
the boundary lines of the tract to be developed and a barricade shall be constructed at the end of
the street. These street stubs to adjoining properties are not considered to be cul-de-sacs since
they are intended to continue as through streets at such time as the adjoining property is
developed. A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the property owners
which shall not be removed until authorized by the City Engineer, the cost of which shall be
included in the street construction cost. Temporary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de-
sac bulbs shall be constructed for stub streets in excess of 150 feet in length.
The applicant has indicated that there is not an opportunity for future street connections through this
development due to the wetlands area on the west side of this property. Staff concurs wi�h this
assessment.
Private Streets: Section 18.810.030.T states that design standards for private streets shall be
established by the. City Engineer. The City shall require legal assurances for the continued
maintenance of private streets, such as a recorded maintenance agreement. Private streets
serving more than six dwelling units are permitted only within planned developments, mobile
home parks, and multi-family residential developments.
The applicant has indicated that this partition will provide a 10-foot paved shared access within a 15-foot
easement. The applicant has also indicated that the adjacent partition will be providing the same section
on their property. The two combined will provide a 20-foot private street within a 30-foot access
easement be recorded such that all four properties created will have full use of the entire private street.
The applicant shall place a statement on the face of the final plat indicating the private street(s) will be
owned and mamtained by the properties that will be served by iUthem. The City's p,ublic improvement
design standards require private streets to have a pavement section equal to a public local street. The
applicant will need to provide this type of pavement section.
Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be
desi�ned with due regard to providing adequate buifding sites for the use contemplated,
consideration of needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and
recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography.
Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall
not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of-way line except:
. Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of
water or, pre�xisting development or;
. For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, major collectors or
railroads.
. For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access.
The location of the proposed access drive is precluded from extending to SW Maple Court to the east by
a wetland. Therefore this standard does not apply.
Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements
or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is not possible. Spacing between
connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or
topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards
in the code.
As mentioned above, connection of the proposed private street to SW Maple Court to the east is
precluded by an existing wetland. Therefore, this standard does not apply.
Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(Aj prohibits lot dePth from bein� more than 2.5 times
the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the
applicable zoning district.
The average lot width for the proposed parcels is approximately 80 feet. Therefore, the depth of the
proposed lots cannot exceed 200 feet. The applicant's plans show the lots to be no more than 125 feet
deep at the furthest point from the front of the lots. This criterion has been satisfied.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00012/FINEVIEW FARM PARTITION PAGE 12 OF 17
Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public
or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies,
which requires a parcel to either have a rninimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide
recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit,
the frontage shall be at least 15 feet.
The smallest of the proposed parcels has approximately 35 feet of frontage onto the proposed private
street, which connec�s to SW 90th Avenue. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied.
Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design
standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private
streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side.
The applicant will be required to sign a Restrictive Covenant for future street improvements, which will
include the construction of sidewalks along the frontage of SW 90�' Avenue.
The private street that will serve the four lots (2 lots for this partition and 2 lots for the adjacent partition)
will be required to construct sidewalks on at least one side.
Sanitary Sewers:
Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each
new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the
provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water
Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or
amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan.
Over-sizin�: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include
consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive
Plan.
The applicant's plan indicate that a new, 8-inch public sewer will be constructed from the sewer in gptn
Avenue to the lots. A public easement will be required for a portion of the sewer line. The applicant will
be required to provide a copy of the recorded easement prior to construction.
Storm Drainage:
General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for
storm water and flood water runoff.
Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other
drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream
drainage area, whether inside or oufside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the
necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for
Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and
including any future revisions or amendments).
There is no significant upstream drainage way. Any upstream runoff entering the project access area
will be collected in the proposed catch basin.
Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the
City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing
draina�e facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until
provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have
been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the
Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by
Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments).
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00012/FINEVIEW FARM PARTITION PAGE 13 OF 17
In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno
Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local
governments institute a s{ormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no
net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments
resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the
development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the
storm water runofF will be permitted to discharge without detention.
Developments of this small size, especially residential land partitions, are not required to provide on-site
detention. The applicant will be required to pay the water quantity SDC upon application for the building
permits.
The appIicanYs plans indicate that runoff will be collected and discharged to the existing wetland to the
west. The plans provide for a rip-rap outFall for energy dissipation and erosion control.
Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways:
Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed
bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for
the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way.
SW 90�'Avenue is not designated as a bicycle facility.
Utilities:
Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric,
communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed
underground, except for surFace mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and
meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during
construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and:
. The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide
the underground services;
. The City reserves the right to approve location of all surFace mounted facilities;
. All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets
by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and
. Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street
improvements when service connections are made.
Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall
pay a fee in-lieu of under-�rounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a
street where existing utilities which are not underg round will serve the development and the
approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-g rounding the
utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The
determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only: such
situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the
placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An
applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which
are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of
under-grounding.
There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW 90th Avenue. If the fee in-lieu is
proposed, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The
frontage along this site is 15 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $412.50.
ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT
Public Water S stem:
ua a in a ey a,er District provides public, water service in this area. The applicant will need to
contact TV Water Distract for a new water service upon construction of the new homes.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00012/FINEVIEW FARM PARTITION PAGE 14 OF 17
Storm Water Qualit :
e ity as agree to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by
Clean Water Serv�ces (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and
Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities
shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm
water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan
shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility
maintained through the year.
The CWS standards include a provision that would exclude small projects such as residential land
partitions. It would be impracticaf to require an on-site water quality facility to accommodate treatment of
the storm water from 2 parcels. Rather, the CWS standards provide that applicants should pay a fee
in-lieu of constructing a facility, if deemed appropriate. Staff recommends payment of the fee in-lieu on
this application.
Address Assi nments:
e i y o igar is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within
the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30.00 per address shall be
assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to final plat approval.
For this project, the addressing fee will be $60.00 (2 lots and/or tracts X $30/address = $60.00).
The developer will also be required to provide signage at the entrance of each shared flag lot driveway
or private s�reet that lists the addresses that are served by the given driveway or street. This will assist
emergency services personnel to more easily find a particular home.
Surve Re uirements
e app ican s ina p at shall contain State Plane Coordinates [NAD 83 (91)] on two monuments with a
tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network (GC 22). These monuments
shafl be on fhe same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat
boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground
measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be
established by:
. GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey.
. By random traverse using conventional surveying methods.
In addition, the ap p.licant's as-built drawings shall be tied to the GPS nefinrork. The applicanYs.engineer
shall provide the City with an electronic file with points for each structure (manholes, catch basins, water
valves, hydrants and other water system features in the development, and their respective X and Y
State Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD 83 (91�.
SECTION VI. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS
City of Tigard Water Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it.
City of Tigard Long Range Planning Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections.
City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it.
City of Tigard Building Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it.
SECTION VII. AGENCY COMMENTS
Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments.
As per the applicants request, the conditions in this approval letter are based on both homes
being protected with automatic fire sprinklers installed in accordance with NFPA 13D.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00012/FINEVIEW FARM PARTITION PAGE 15 OF 17
�� FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD DISTANCE FROM BUILDING AND TURNAROUNDS: Access
roa s s a e wit in eet o a portions o t e exterior wa o t e irst story o t e uilding as
measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building. An approved turnaround is
required if the remaining distance to an approved intersecting roadway, as measured along the fire
apparatus access road, is greater than 150 feet. (UFC Sec. 962.2.1)
fVo turnaround will be required for fire apparatus.
2� FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD WIDTH AND VERTICAL CLEARANCE: Fire apparatus access
roa s s a ave an uno structe wi t o not ess t an eet eet or one or two dwelling
units and out buildings), and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches.
(UFC Sec. 902.2.2.1) Where fire.apparatus roadways are less than 28 feet wide, "NO PARKING"
signs shall be installed on both sides of the roadway and m turnarounds as needed. Where fire
apparatus roadways are more than 28 feet wide but less than 32 feet wide, "NO PARKING" signs
shall be installed on one side of the roadway and in tumarounds as needed. Where fire apparatus
roadways are 32 feet wide or more, parking is not restricted. (UFC Sec. 902.2.4)
3� SURFACE AND LOAD CAPACITIES: Fire apparatus access roads shall be of an all-weather
su ace t at is easi y istinguis a e rom the surrounding area and is capable of supporting not less
than 12,500 pounds point load (wheel Ioad) and 50,000 pounds live load (gross vehicle weight). You
may need to provide documentation from a registered engineer that the design will be capable of
supporting such loading. Documentation from a registered engineer that the finished construction is
in accordance with the approved plans or the requirements of the Fire Code may be requested.
(Design criteria on back) (UFC Sec. 902.2.2)
a� TURNING RADIUS: The inside tuming radius and outside turning radius shall be not less than 25
eet an eet respectively, measured from the same center point. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.3)
s� NO PARKING SIGNS: Where fire apparatus roadways are not of sufficient width to accommodate
par e ve ic es an feet of unobstructed dnving surface, "No Parking" signs shall be installed on
one or both sides of the roadway and in turnarounds as needed. (UFC Sec. 902.2.4) Signs shall
read "NO PARKING - FIRE LANE - TOW AWAY ZONE, ORS 98.810 - 98.812" and shall be installed
with a clear space above grade level of 7 feet. Signs shall be 12 inches wide by 18 inches high and
shall have black or red letters and border on a white background. (UFC Sec. 901.4.5.1) – (See
diagram on back)
s� GRADE: Private fire apparatus access roadway grades shall not exceed an average grade of 10
percent with a maximum grade of 15 percent for lengths of no more than 200 feet. Infersections and
turnarounds shall be level (maximum 5%� with the exception of crowning for water run-off. Public
streets shall have a maximum grade of 15/o. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.6)
�> SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES - FIRE HYDRANTS: Fire hXdrants for single family
we ings, up exes an su - ivisions, s a e p ace at eac mtersection. Intermediate fire
hydrants are required if any portion of a structure exceeds 500 feet from a hydrant at an intersection
as measured in an approved manner around the outside of the structure and along approved fire
apparatus access roadways. Placement of additional fire hydrants shall be as approved by the
Chief. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.2)
a> SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS - REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: The minimum available fire flow for
sing e ami y we ings an up exes s a e , ga ons per minute. If the structure(s) is(are)
3,600 square feet or larger, the required fire flow shall be determined according to UFC Appendix
Table A-III-A-1. (UFC Appendix III-A, Sec. 5)
s� ACCESS AND FIRE FIGHTING WATER SUPPLY DURING CONSTRUCTION: Approved fire
apparatus access roa ways an ire ig tin� water supp ies s a e insta e an operational prior to
any other construction on the site or subdivision. (UFC Sec. 8704)
SECTION VIII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION
Notice: Notice was mailed to:
X The applicant and owners
–� Owner of record within the required distance
—X— Affected government agencies
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00012/FINEVIEW FARM PARTITION PAGE 16 OF 17
Final Decision:
THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON SEPTEMBER 17, 2003 AND BECOMES
EFFECTIVE ON OCTOBER 2, 2003 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED.
A��ea�l:
The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are
otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may
appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development
Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director
within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule
and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard,
Oregon 97223.
Unless the applicant is the appellant,_the hearing.on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be
confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the
comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may
be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, sub�ect to any additional rules of procedure that
may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body.
THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON OCTOBER 1, 2003.
Questions:
you ave any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW
Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171.
Seqtember 17, 2003
PREPARED BY: Mathew Scheidegger DATE
Associate Planner
�,,,,��j� September 17, 2003
APPROVED BY: Richard H. Bewersd DATE
Planning Manager
i/curpl Nmathew/mlp/mIp2003-00012.dec
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00012/FINEVIEW FARM PARTITION PAGE 17 OF 17
� � . - .
0
rn __ . .,,<<.,�,�.,.. ,.s,EM
- nc�N�r�r �
CORAL gT = _ _ _ _ _ _ _
° MLP2003-0001 �
0
0
o °o
°o 0
00 � � � � � � � �
°o°o
°° f I N EVI EW FARM LLC
00
°° PARTITION
T ST j
� ¢
O
�
>
J
m
MAPLELEAF ST � >
w ,, Q
� > •� �w ` `
�s��
Q t�.`�`�,� ��`° , �
��.:4��1TE�� a�� ;�
^�:A�.'ti�j� ;,ti::,�' /ER.R ' ._ '
� �.�..,7� �_ �s"
ti\�a' �� ,. �
��" � •a ,
.. :� Fv' ._..� N"�� .
��1'��'�� �§ TF D
2 �—
_ =--._. `�'� ' �
00 J � J e�er?�°=°� —
y = -- - •--
rqaa n.ea Map �
ST
♦
O N
0 100 200 300 Fee[
1'=249 faet
PINE ST
City of Tigard
Informatlon on Ihis map is fw general IocaUm only and
should 6a venfled wiN ihe Development Servlces DiWsion.
13125 SW Hall BIvA
. Tlga�d,OR 97723
(503)63&4171
hrip J/www.ci.tiga rd.or.us
Community Development Plot date:Aug 8,2003;C:lmagic\MAGIC03.APR
� I � I Z �
I w I I __ I
� Z � i i------- L------ � � I
I w � �_ ------- � TL 600 �
I > �-------- � -------- I TL 805 I � I / •
i Q i i �— --1 i w i i �
�
� _ � 7L 902 � TL 905 � � � I /
I � I I I �-----------� N � //
I �
I �
� I /
� cn I �--------- � TL 806 � I i
i I ----------� 1 i
T� 100 � TL 901 TL 1000 I j I �
� � � TL 800 � � ��//
j � �-----------y� ��
� � � � � i
-----------� � i -' �' � �
�
------------
tAPLE STREET —�--�' � if—
U 105' 159'
. lpp• . �'
s�. ti� TL 1301 TRACT ��A�� TL 590
-----------, � TL 1001 ` �= _.._. 3t,o9� sq.it.
� � 6`� Porce! 1 j'.'.�'\o.�t o�r�s
� � N�r: a.s3J :q.��. ,' - •�-r � '�.
i �� c.oss: n,zs�Sy.��.�o /:�.... i.
I ,�;�
I � ,/ �:. .'.'. .� .'. •,
TL 100 I I I -------- N \ � . .'.'.'.' '•�. .'J
� � Porcef 2 � .' ' ' ' ' �� ' '/
� � � �0.09� sq.r�. y� :�:.:. _. .��C/' �P-1
� � TL 1002 ti� ./•� .•.•'./• '�`' �.�0� -------------------
� I i �� i+.., . .,;~ `'' ��(� /�'�
I :. • ,
�3 B2
� I �-______-- �..� Q � �
� � •i --�pQ'-- � I
� I I •i ��, i
� � TL 1101 ') Q.P i� I
I
� i e.1 O�CCi� ,�� � �
I � �•,�, Q i �
� '. .
� � . . 0P �� I
i I r---------�------------ .• P ,� i
� I T�- >>�2 I TL 1100 � TL 401 �i� I
I �
� I � � i� TL 1200 I
� I I �
I � � ��� �� I
� � � � i I
� � � �i �� I
� J-----
-----------' �----------�-----� i-------------------
- / i
NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION
MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2003-00012 .
CITY OF TIOARD
Community�DeveCopment
FINEVIEW FARM, LLC PARTITION ,sha ingABetterCommunity
120 DAYS = 12/3/2003
SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY
FILE NAME: FINEVIEW FARM, LLC PARTITION
CASE NO: Minor Land Partition (MLP) � MLP2003-00012
PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Minor Land Partition approval to partition a parcel of
land within the city limits of Tigard. The parcel is 1.20 acres. The proposal is to
divide the property into two parcels of 10,094 square feet and 8,933 square feet
with 33,245 square feet in a tract for wetlands. Both parcels will have
approximately 15 feet of frontage along SW 90�h Avenue.
APPLICANT/ Fineview Farm L.L.C. APPLICANT'S REP.: Ed Murphy & Associates
OWNER: Attn: Dan Boyden 9875 SW Murdock Street
1430 Eastside Road Tigard, OR 972224
Hood River, OR 97031
ZONING
DESIGNATION: R-4.5, Low-Density Residential. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to
accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential
units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached
single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses
are also permitted conditionally.
LOCATION: The subject property is located east of SW 90th Avenue, 330 feet south of SW
Locust Street; WCTM 1 S135AA, Tax Lot 1000.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715,
18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
SECTION II. DECISION
Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has
APPROVED the above request. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted
in the full decision, available at City Hall.
THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS
FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION.
All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or
copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25G) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the
time of the request.
SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION .
Notice:
oN tice mailed to:
X The applicant and owners
� Owner of record within the required distance
�— Affected government agencies
Final Decision:
THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON SEPTEMBER 17, 2003 AND BECOMES
EFFECTIVE ON OCTOBER 2, 2003 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED.
Appeal:
The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are
otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may
appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community
Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed
with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The
appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW
Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223.
Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be
confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the
comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may
be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that
may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body.
THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON OCT�BER 1, 2003.
Questions:
For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Mathew ScheideqcLer at
(503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223.
_ - - - - _ L - -_L ........................
- ���
�� _ ________
� _ MLP2003-00012
� FINEYIEW FARM lLC
- PARTITION
T _ sr >
r <
_ - �
� r >
—l_ �
2 L a --
- k � '
� rrr A
•
— N
' �...
RNE ST �
CM of T�prd
.r'rr.�w
� � r�.wrr
1—_ _ _. — --. __ - .�—,�___—'._
�y' ..___1 i �
i i � r"_'_ �
z � i L_'_'_.__-__y �I i rtuw
i '_,
i S'� r__'..-'_- 1
a � r" � rt eoe �
i �� i
��I � n rw � ii wa ! ��;' �
i , � � .
i
' I � i ' __'__'� s � �.
� � f_""' ,
�h I
1 �N �
I � �________ I_ 1 R�0{ � i
�i iao I � / "n�oo '__� �
' � n oo� n�ow � � !
� ; oo � j I
� � i �� �-�------- �
� i.
_� / r
i i � '
'"____'___J i � � i •
. i
uP�E SINEET _—'._ _" '/ ( �
____ ; y _ y
. 1 �__'_."' .'__
_"___._____i 1 Il IWI �• '�IL I�pl � lFAC!"A' IL SvU
� i "PncM I r."._r+'\��
� � � ��ii»�° �-._.' 1 i
:.. ` A�
1 I � ,�\ ,y•• ,....:i ,
rt�oo i qW�+» . ;.'.'l
i f-------- ��''....•.','!.:' ra
� � * .. .
� •. . .
� � . .. . ..-:c' r
' I i n iw� o /'..•.�.-..j.• •
� ,�.'.�.�.•��.
ii .. . . . . ��.: ' �� ------ '..----- ----
i � + µ� r
.. .. . .
:.. . .. . i
' � �-----.... .. . . . . .
I � � ' --o�-- �
i
� 1 i�o� � ��'p i
' o '
i
' � �,' i
� � .
, � '• � �
i � � �
i r-------'�--r---------—i ' '
' i rt uae i n nao n w�
i � � i
, �
� . i
i i .' ,' n um i
i . . i
i � � ' � �
. �
� � � .' � i
"'_""__' �____� .
"_'_"'__ .
- �'_'____""___"" ___'_
.�c_____"��
. � . '____ ""'_ "'__'_'____r___
. . . '___ t
� `•• ' OF �v�� � MLP2003-00012
�n� N FtMEV1EW FARM, LLC PARTITION
N nat b�cW
NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER:
THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQl11RES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE TH�S NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER.
NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION CRYOFTIGARD
MINOR LAND PARTITION Community�DeveCopment
S(taping/7 BetterCommunity
DATE OF NOTICE: August 11, 2003
FILE NUMBER: MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2003-00012
FILE NAME: FINEVIEW FARM LLC PARTITION
PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval to perform a two-lot partition on a parcel of land
containing approximately 52,272 square feet. This partition will create Parcel #1 with
approximately 10,094 square feet, and Parcel#2 with approximately 8,933 square feet.
ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to
accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at
a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are
permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally.
APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390,
18.420, 18.59 0, 18.705, 18.715, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
LOCATION: No site address; WCTM 1 S135AA, Tax Lot 1000.
YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS:
Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to
submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT
5:OU PM ON AUGUST=25, 2003. All comments should be directed to Mathew Scheideqger, Associate Planner in
the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the
City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171 or by e-mail to matts(c�ci.tiqard.or.us.
ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED
ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS.
THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS
WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE
IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR SEPTEMBER 9, 2003. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE
SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED.
WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL
CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
. Address the specific "Applicable Review Crite�ia" described in the section above or any other criteria
believed to be applicable to this proposal;
. Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to
provide a response;
. Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant
approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue.
Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude
subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings
directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence.
AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE
DIRECTOR�S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN
500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE
ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED
UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH
CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION.
SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS:
. The application is accepted by the City
. Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a
14-day written comment period.
. The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies.
. City Staff issues a written decision.
. Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all
owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax
assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any
governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the
City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice.
INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW:
The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are
contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development
Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this
service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of
this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments."
� --
YIClNITY MAP
CORAL ST —_------
� MLP2003-00012
� fINEYIEW FARM LlC
PARTITION
T sr >
� a
0
>
J
m
�F Q /
� \\\�
� .
:�` �
J:
_ = i
N
k � � ��� ,
,_� �.
= TM.,_..
T �
N
�`�
PINE ST �
c�ry orr��a
. �o....W.�...
...,.�..a..�
�:�+��,
un»...��,
ba�sti
}
i�
��� ;, r� �-JALATIN VALLEY FIRE 8� RESC� � SOUTH DIVISION
,/ COMMUNITY SERVICES • OPERATIONS • FIRE PREVENTION
Tualatin Valley
Fire & Rescue
September 2, 2003
Mathew Scheidegger, Associate Planner
City of Tigard
13125 SW Hall Blvd
Tigard, OR 97223
Re: Fineview Partition 2
Dear Mathew,
I have reviewed the submittal for the above named project and have the following comments:
1) FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD DISTANCE FROM BUILDING AND TURNAROUNDS: Access roads
shall be within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior wall of the first story of the building as measured by an
approved route around the exterior of the building. An approved turnaround is required if the remaining
distance to an approved intersecting roadway, as measured along the fire apparatus access road, is greater
than 150 feet. (UFC Sec. 902.2.1)
No turnaround will be required for fire apparatus.
2) FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD WIDTH AND VERTICAL CLEARANCE: Fire apparatus access roads
shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 20 feet (15 feet for one or two dwelling units and out
buildings), and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.1}
Where fire apparatus roadways are less than 28 feet wide, "NO PARKING"signs shall be installed on both
sides of the roadway and in turnarounds as needed. Where fire apparatus roadways are more than 28 feet
wide but less than 32 feet wide, "NO PARKING" signs shall be installed on one side of the roadway and in
turnarounds as needed. Where fire apparatus roadways are 32 feet wide or more, parking is not restricted.
(UFC Sec. 902.2.4)
3) SURFACE AND LOAD CAPACITIES: Fire apparatus access roads shall be of an all-weather surface that is
easily distinguishable from the surrounding area and is capable of supporting not less than 12,500 pounds
point load (wheel load)and 50,000 pounds live load (gross vehicle weight). You may need to provide
documentation from a registered engineer that the design will be capable of supporting such loading.
Documentation from a registered engineer that the finished construction is in accordance with the approved
plans or the requirements of the Fire Code may be requested. (Design criteria on back) (UFC Sec. 902.2.2)
4) TURNING RADIUS: The inside turning radius and outside turning radius shall be not less than 25 feet and
45 feet respectively, measured from the same center point. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.3)
5) NO PARKING SIGNS: Where fire apparatus roadways are not of sufficient width to accommodate parked
vehicles and 20 feet of unobstructed driving surface, "No Parking"signs shall be installed on one or both
sides of the roadway and in turnarounds as needed. (UFC Sec. 902.2.4) Signs shall read "NO PARKING -
FIRE LANE -TOW AWAY ZONE, ORS 98.810 - 98.812"and shall be installed with a clear space above
grade level of 7 feet. Signs shall be 12 inches wide by 18 inches high and shall have black or red letters
and border on a white background. (UFC Sec. 901.4.5.1)—(See diagram on back)
6) GRADE: Private fire apparatus access roadway grades shall not exceed an average grade of 10 percent
with a maximum grade of 15 percent for lengths of no more than 200 feet. Intersections and turnarounds
shall be level (maximum 5%)with the exception of crowning for water run-off. Public streets shall have a
maximum grade of 15%. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.6)
7) SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES- FIRE HYDRANTS: Fire hydrants for single family
dwellings, duplexes and sub-divisions, shall be placed at each intersection. Intermediate fire hydrants are
required if any portion of a structure exceeds 500 feet from a hydrant at an intersection as measured in an
7401 SW Washo Court,Suite 101 •Tualatin,Oregon 97062•Tel.(503)612-7000•Fax(503)612-7003•www.rifr.com
.
�
approved manner around th� .,utside of the structure and along approve :apparatus access roadways.
Placement of additional fire hydrants shall be as approved by the Chief. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.2)
8) SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS - REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: The minimum available fire flow for single family
dwellings and duplexes shall be 1,000 gallons per minute. If the structure(s) is(are)3,600 square feet or
larger, the required fire flow shall be determined according to UFC Appendix Table A-III-A-1. (UFC
Appendix III-A, Sec. 5)
9) ACCESS AND FIRE FIGHTING WATER SUPPLY DURING CONSTRUCTION: Approved fire apparatus
access roadways and fire fighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to any other
construction on the site or subdivision. (UFC Sec. 8704)
Please contact me at (503) 612-7010 with any additional questions.
Sincerely,
Eric T . McMullen
Eric T. McMullen
Deputy Fire Marshal
.
,
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
DATE: 9/9/03
TO: Matt Scheidegger, Associate Planner
FROM: Kim McMillan, Development Review Enginee��yy�
�.,, �
RE: MLP2003-00012 Fineview Farm Partition
Access Management (Section 18.705.030.H)
Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with
all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and
streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and
deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and
AASHTO.
The applicant has indicated that vision clearance areas can be met and that sight
distance to the north is currently unobstructed. The applicant's engineer shall
provide sight distance ce�tification for the proposed shared access prior to
approval of the final plat.
Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be
placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections.
Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic
commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway
setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be150 feet,
measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat
of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the
influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact
report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a
project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore
any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is
not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the
intersection as possible.
Both Oak and Locust Streets are classified as collector streets. The proposed
shared access onto 90th Avenue is located approximately 310 feet from Locust
Street and 450 feet from Oak Street, thereby meeting this criterion.
Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways
and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of
driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum
spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2003-00012 Fineview Farm Partition PAGE 1
SW 90th Avenue is classified as a local street; therefore this standard does not
apply to the proposed driveway.
Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810):
Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of
public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and
drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below:
Streets:
Improvements:
Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets
adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards.
Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width
planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved
in accordance with the TDC.
Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a
local street to have a 54 right-of-way width and 32-foot paved section. Other
improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and
bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street
trees.
This site lies adjacent to SW 90th Avenue, which is classified as a local street on
the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 25
feet of ROW from centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map.
The applicant should dedicate ROW to provide 27 feet from centerline.
SW 90th Avenue is currently paved, but not fully improved to City standards. In
order to mitigate the impact from this development, the applicant should sign a
Restrictive Covenant for future street improvements.
Future Street Plan and Extension of Streets: Section 18.810.030.F states
that a future street plan shall be filed which shows the pattern of existing and
proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land division.
This section also states that where it is necessary to give access or permit a
satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to the
boundary lines of the tract to be developed and a barricade shall be
constructed at the end of the street. These street stubs to adjoining
properties are not considered to be cul-de-sacs since they are intended to
continue as through streets at such time as the adjoining property is
developed. A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2003-00012 Fineview Farm Partition PAGE 2
properiy owners which shall not be removed until authorized by the City
Engineer, the cost of which shall be included in the street construction cost.
Temporary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de-sac bulbs shall be
constructed for stub streets in excess of 150 feet in length.
The applicant has indicated that there is not an opportunity for future street
connections through this development due to the wetlands area on the west side of
this property. Staff concurs with this assessment.
Private Streets: Section 18.810.030.T states that design standards for
private streets shall be established by the City Engineer. The City shall
require legal assurances for the continued maintenance of private streets,
such as a recorded maintenance agreement. Private streets serving more
than six dwelling units are permitted only within planned developments,
mobile home parks, and multi-family residential developments.
The applicant has indicated that this partition will provide a 10 foot paved shared
access within a 15 foot easement. The applicant has also indicated that the
adjacent partition will be providing the same section on their property. The two
combined will provide a 20 foot private street within a 30 foot access easement
be recorded such that all four properties created will have full use of the entire
private street.
The applicant shall place a statement on the face of the final plat indicating the
private street(s) will be owned and maintained by the properties that will be
served by it/them. The City's public improvement design standards require
private streets to have a pavement section equal to a public local street. The
applicant will need to provide this type of pavement section.
Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape
of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building
sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient
access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of
limitations and opportunities of topography.
Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks
formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of-
way line except:
• Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or
other bodies of water or, pre-existing development or;
• For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, major
collectors or railroads.
• For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides
equivalent access.
PLANNING
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2003-00012 Fineview Farm Partition PAGE 3
Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections
on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street
connection is not possible. Spacing between connections shall be no
more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or
topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict
adherence to other standards in the code.
PLANNING
Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being
more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5
times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district.
PLANNING
Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of
frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land
partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a
minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access
easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling
unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet.
PLANNING
Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to
meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial,
collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets
shall have sidewalks on at least one side.
The applicant will be required to sign a Restrictive Covenant for future street
improvements, which will include the construction of sidewalks along the frontage
of SW 90th Avenue.
The private street that will serve the four lots (2 lots for this partition and 2 lots for
the adjacent partition) will be required to construct sidewalks on at least one side.
Sanitary Sewers: '
Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be
installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to
existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and
Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as
adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future
revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive
plan.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2003-00012 Fineview Farm Partition PAGE 4
t�
Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems
shall include consideration of additional development within the area as
projected by the Comprehensive Plan.
The applicanYs plan indicate that a new, 8-inch public sewer will be constructed
from the sewer in 90�h Avenue to the lots. A public easement will be required for
a portion of the sewer line. The applicant will be required to provide a copy of the
recorded easement prior to construction.
Storm Drainage:
General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make
adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff.
Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a
culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate
potential runofF from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or
outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary
size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction
Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management(as adopted by
Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or
amendments).
There is no significant upstream drainage way. Any upstream runoff entering the
project access area will be collected in the proposed catch basin.
Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it
is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from
the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and
Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have
been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions
have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the
development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards
for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water
Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments).
In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek
and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that
pfan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater
detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net
increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that
all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide
onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno
Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff
will be permitted to discharge without detention.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2003-00012 Fineview Farm Partition PAGE 5
Developments of this small size, especially residential land partitions, are not
required to provide on-site detention. The applicant will be required to pay the
water quantity SDC upon application for the building permits.
The applicanYs plans indicate that runofF will be collected and discharged to the
existing wetland to the west. The plans provide for a rip-rap outfall for energy
dissipation and erosion control.
Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways:
Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments
adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted
pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of
such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way.
SW 90th Avenue is not designated as a bicycle facility.
Utilities:
Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those
required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services
and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface
mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter
cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service
facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at
50,000 volts or above, and:
• The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving
utility to provide the underground services;
• The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted
facilities;
• All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains
installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the
surfacing of the streets; and
• Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing
the street improvements when service connections are made.
Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states
that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the
development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities
which are not underground will serve the development and the approval
authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-
grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in
conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2003-00012 Fineview Farm Partition PAGE 6
.
by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a
short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the
placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground
utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by
utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public
right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-
grounding.
There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW 90th Avenue. If
the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage
that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 15 lineal feet;
therefore the fee would be $ 412.50.
ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND
UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS:
Public Water System:
Tualatin Valley Water District provides public water service in this area. The
applicant will need to contact N Water Distract for a new water service upon
construction of the new homes.
Storm Water Quality:
The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM)
regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and
Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which
require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities
shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100
percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious
surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the
frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained
through the year.
The CWS standards include a provision that would exclude small projects such
as residential land partitions. It would be impractical to require an on-site water
quality facility to accommodate treatment of the storm water from 2 parcels.
Rather, the CWS standards provide that applicants should pay a fee-in-lieu of
constructing a facility, if deemed appropriate. Staff recommends payment of the
fee-in-lieu on this application.
Address Assignments:
The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the
City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2003-00012 Fineview Farm Partition PAGE 7
.
in the amount of$ 30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to
the City prior to final plat approval.
For this project, the addressing fee will be $60.00 (2 lots and/or tracts X
$30/address = $60.00).
The developer will also be required to provide signage at the entrance of each
shared flag lot driveway or private street that lists the addresses that are served
by the given driveway or street. This will assist emergency services personnel to
more easily find a particular home.
Survey Requirements
The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates [NAD 83 (91)] on
two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic
control network (GC 22). These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be
of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the
coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements
to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates
can be established by:
• GPS tie nefin►orked to the City's GPS survey.
• By random traverse using conventional surveying methods.
In addition, the applicant's as-built drawings shall be tied to the GPS network.
The applicant's engineer shall provide the City with an electronic file with points
for each structure (manholes, catch basins, water valves, hydrants and other
water system features) in the development, and their respective X and Y State
Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD 83 (91).
Recommendations:
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO
APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT:
Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642)
for review and approval:
. Prior to commencing onsite improvements, a Public Facility Improvement
(PFI) permit is required for this project to cover the sewer tap and
construction and any other work in the public right-of-way. Six (6) sets of
detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the
Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any
drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2003-00012 Fineview Farm Partition PAGE 8
r
•
relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit
plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards,
which are available at City Hall and the City's web page
(www.ci.tiqard.or.us).
. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address
and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be
designated as the "Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance
for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a
corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which
the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact
person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering
Department will delay processing of project documents.
. Prior to final plat approval the applicant shall construct sidewalks along at
least one side of the private street.
. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the
amount of$60.00. (STAFF CONTACT: Shirley Treat, Engineering).
. The applicant shall execute a Restrictive Covenant whereby they agree to
complete or participate in the future improvements of SW 90th Avenue
adjacent to the subject property, when any of the following events occur:
A. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or
paid for by the formation of a Local Improvement District,
B. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or
paid for in whole or in part by the City or other public agency,
C. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be constructed
by a third party and involves the sharing of design and/or construction
expenses by the third party owner(s) of property in addition to the
subject property, or
D. when construction of the improvements is deemed to be appropriate
by the City Engineer in conjunction with construction of improvements
by others adjacent to the subject site.
. The final plat shall show the dedication of ROW on 90th Avenue to provide
27 feet from centerline.
. The applicant shall cause a statement to be placed on the final plat to
indicate that the proposed private street(s) will be jointly owned and
maintained by the private property owners who abut and take access from it
(them).
. The applicant's plan shall show a public sewer extension from SW gptn
Avenue to the proposed development.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2003-00012 Fineview Farm Partition PAGE 9
»
. The applicant shall obtain approval from the Tualatin Valley Water District for
the proposed water connection prior to issuance of the City's Public Facility
Improvement permit.
. The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two
monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic
control network (GC 22). These monuments shall be on the same line and
shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary.
Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert
ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to
grid north. These coordinates can be established by:
• GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey.
• By random traverse using conventional surveying methods.
. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements:
A. Submit for City review four (4) paper copies of the final plat prepared
by a land surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or
narrative.
B. Attach a check in the amount of the current final plat review fee
(Contact Planning/Engineering Permit Technicians, at (503) 639-4171, ext.
426).
C. The final plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum
standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05),
Washington County, and by the City of Tigard.
D. The right-of-way dedication for 90th Avenue shall be made on the final
plat.
E. NOTE: Washington County will not begin their review of the final plat
until they receive notice from the Engineering Department indicating that the
City has reviewed the final plat and submitted comments to the applicant's
surveyor.
F. After the City and County have reviewed the final plat, submit two mylar
copies of the final plat for City Engineer signature (for partitions), or City
Engineer and Community Development Director signatures (for
subdivisions).
. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant's professional engineer shall
provide a sight distance certification for the proposed access onto SW 90�'
Avenue.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2003-00012 Fineview Farm Partition PAGE 10
w �
. The applicant's construction drawings shall show that the pavement and
rock section for the proposed private street(s) shall meet the City's public
street standard for a local residential street.
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS:
Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642)
for review and approval:
. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide the
Engineering Department with a "photomylar" copy of the recorded final plat.
. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide the City with
as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) 3 mil mylar, 2) a
diskette of the as-builts in "DWG"format, if available; otherwise "DXF"will be
acceptable, and 3) the as-built drawings shall be tied to the City's GPS
network. The applicanYs engineer shall provide the City with an electronic
file with points for each structure (manholes, catch basins, water valves,
hydrants and other water system features) in the development, and their
respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD 83 (91).
. Any necessary off-site utility easements shall be the responsibility of the
applicant to obtain and shall be submitted to and accepted by the City prior
to issuance of a building permit.
. The applicant shall provide signage at the entrance of each shared flag lot
driveway or private street that lists the addresses that are served by the
given driveway or street.
. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW
90th Avenue underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee
in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the
site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 27.50 per lineal foot. If the
fee option is chosen, the amount will be $ 412.50 and it shall be paid prior to
issuance of building permits.
. Prior to issuance of the building permit for Parcels 1 & 2, the applicant shall
pay the standard water quality and water quantity fees per lot (fee amounts
will be the latest approved by CWS).
. The 25-foot undisturbed buffer shall be shown on the construction plans.
The sensitive area boundary and/or buffer shall be staked in the field
throughout the construction process in order to protect the sensitive area.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP2003-00012 Fineview Farm Partition PAGE 11
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITYOFTIGARD
Community�7�eveCopmcnt
ShapingA�etter Community
DATE: August 11,2003 REC�IVED PLANNING
T0: Barbara Shields,long Range Planning Manager
AUG 1 2 2003
FROM: Cit�of Tigard Planning Division
STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Associate Planner[x243T1 CITY OF TIGARD
Phane: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-1291
MINOR LAND PARTITION[MLP)2003-00012
➢ FINEVIEW FARM LLC PARTITION Q
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to perform a two-lot partition on a parcel of land
containing approximately 52,272 square feet. This partition will create Parcel #1 with approximately
10,094 square feet, and Parcel #2 with approximately 8,933 square feet. LOCATION: No site address;
WCTM 1S135AA, Tax Lot 1000. ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning
district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential
units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are
permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally.
APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.510,
18.705, 18.715, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Information for your review. From information supplied by
various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will
be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this
application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: AUGUST 25, 2003. You may use the space provided
below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond bv the above date, please
phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If
you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
_ Written comments provided below:
Name 8� Number of Person Commenting:
w �
REQUEST FOR COMMEHTS CITYOFTIGARD
Community�DeveCopment
ShapingA�etterCommunity
DATE: August 11,2003
T0: Mark Vandomelen,Residential Plans Examiner
FROM: Cit�of Tigard Planning Division
STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Associate Planner[x24311
Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-1291
MINOR LAND PARTITION[MLPI 2003-00012
➢ FIHEVIEW FARM LLC PARTITION Q
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to perform a two-lot partition on a parcel of land
containing approximately 52,272 square feet. This partition will create Parcel #1 with approximately
10,094 square feet, and Parcel #2 with approximately 8,933 square feet. LOCATION: No site address;
WCTM 1S135AA, Tax Lot 1000. ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning
district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential
units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are
permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally.
APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.510,
18.705, 18.715, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Information for your review. From information supplied by
various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will
be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this
application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: AUGUST 25, 2003. You may use the space provided
below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If vou are unable to respond bv the above date, please
phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If
you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
� We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
_ Written comments provided below:
Name& Number of Person Commenting:
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITYOFTIdARD
Community�DeveCopment
S(apingA BetterCommunity
DATE: August 11,2003
T0: lim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevendon Officer
FROM: City of Tigard Plannin9 Division
STAFF COMTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Associate Planner[x243T1
Phone: [5031639-4171/Fax: [5031684-7291
MINOR LAND PARTITION[MLPI 2003-00012
➢ FINEVIEW FARM LLC PARTITION Q
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to perform a two-lot partition on a parcel of land
containing approximately 52,272 square feet. This partition will create Parcel #1 with approximately
10,094 square feet, and Parcel #2 with approximately 8,933 square feet. LOCATION: No site address;
WCTM 1S135AA, Tax Lot 1000. ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning
district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential
units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are
permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally.
APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.510,
18.705, 18.715, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Information for your review. From information supplied by
various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will
be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this
application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: AUGUST 25, 2003. You may use the space provided
below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If vou are unable to respond bv the above date, please
phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If
you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
_ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
_ Written comments provided below:
Name 8�Number of Person Commenting:
� .wo��F X 2S� �
..._,
: �
� �-
� REQUEST FOR COMMENTS GftYOFTIGARD
_ �� Cammunity�DernCopment
� ,SFiapi�?J Bettes Community
I
pp�; Auyast 11,2003
T0: �yti. _ �ltial�dn Yalle�l Wau�Distrlct Aq�ninlstr�tiv�Oiflces
FBOM:� Ci of Ti aro Pl�nq� " 3Ron-
�o
S�AfF CONTA�T: Mathew SeM d� �r Asseciate Planner �43�I
pMu�e: [ l 639�fl1/Fax: [5U3]654-
_..- MINOR LA T1T101i[dILPI Y003�00012
IEW FARM LLC PARTITION Q
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting apprvval to perForm a two-Iot partition on a parcel of land
containing approximafiely 52,272 square feet. This partition will create Parcel #1 with approximately
10,094 square feet, and Parcel #2 with approximately 8,933 square feet, LOCATION: No site address;
WCTM 1S135AA, Tax Lot 1000. ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning
district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential
units at a minimum lo# size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are
permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally.
APP�ICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development CQde Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.510,
18.705, 18.715, 18,745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
Attached are the Site Plan,�cinity Map and Applicant's Infarmation for your review. From informafion supplied by
various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will
I�e prepared and a decision will be rendered on the pro1,�osal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this
application, ��E����I�!�['��.N��iI��������A��'J � i�' ���� �. �°+�+��rt�������������d���� You may use the space provided
below or attach a separate fetter to returri your comments. If vou are unable tu respond bv the above date, please
phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If
you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division. 13125 SW Hall B1vd.,Tigard, OR 97223.
� ' ASEI'�C�H�,�C;�C�,��TI';�EIi��OLti'E�`V�K,t1�1�G�lil��'�j�ytS�iT�I'AT����,/VPpiLI��;���iinr
�
We have reviewed the prvposal and have no objections to it_
� Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
Written comments provided below:
Name&Number of Psrson Commenting: � Q�'v`' �� �'7 �r 3�Z�
Z00/Z00� � %V3 V5�80 COOZ/6i/80
, �
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITYOFTIdARD
Community�DeveCopment
ShapingA BetterCommunity
DATE: Au9ust 11,2003
T0: Dennis Koellermeier,Operations Manager/Water Department
FROM: City of Ti9ard Pianning Division
STAff CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Associate Planner[x243n
Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-7291
MINOR LAND PARTITION[MLPI 2003-00012
➢ FINEVIEW FARM LLC PARTITION Q
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to perform a two-lot partition on a parcel of land
containing approximately 52,272 square feet. This partition will create Parcel #1 with approximately
10,094 square feet, and Parcel #2 with approximately 8,933 square feet. LOCATION: No site address;
WCTM 1S135AA, Tax Lot 1000. ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning
district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential
units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are
permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally.
APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.510,
18.105, 18.715, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Information for your review. From information supplied by
various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will
be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this
application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: AUGUST 25. 2003. You may use the space provided
below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If vou are unable to resqond bv the above date, please
phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If
you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
_ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
_ Written comments provided below:
'.�1.,"��� +���S'�-t L�i
Name 8� Number of Person Commenting: , r w/,�
v��.r
• 4
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS GTYOFTIC3ARD
Community�L7eveCopment
SjapingA Better Community
DATE: AuguSt 11,2003
T0: PER ATTACNED
FROM: Ciiy of Tigard Planning Division
STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Associate Planner[x243]l
Phone: [5031639-41T1/Fax: [5031684-129T
MINOR LAND PARTITION[MLPI 2003-00012
➢ FINEVIEW FARM LLC PARTITION Q
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to perform a two-lot partition on a parcel of land
containing approximately 52,272 square feet. This partition will create Parcel #1 with approximately
10,094 square feet, and Parcel #2 with approximately 8,933 square feet. LOCATION: No site address;
WCTM 1 S135AA, Tax Lot 1000. ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning
district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential
units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are
permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally.
APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.510,
18.705, 18.715, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Information for your review. From information supplied by
various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will
be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this
application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: AUGUST 25, 2003. You may use the space provided
below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If vou are unable to respond bv the above date, please
phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If
you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
_ Written comments provided below:
Name 8 Number of Person Commenting:
: ., CITI ; TIGARD REQUEST FOR CO► ,ENTS
NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS
FILE NOS.: �� —��'Z— FILE NAME: � i � u� �'
CITIgN INYOLYEMENT TEAMS
14-DAY PENDING APPLICATION NOTICE TO CIT AREA: ❑Central �ast ❑South ❑West OProposal Descrip.in Library CIT Book
CITY OFFICES
� LONG RANGE PLANNINGlBarbara Shields,Planning Mgr. COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPTJPIanning-Engineering Techs. XPOLICE DEPT./Jim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer
�BUILDING DIVISIONlGary Lampella,Building Official KENGINEERING DEPTJKim McMillan,Dvlpmnt.Review Engineer�WATER DEPTJDennis Kcellermeier,Publicworks Mgr.
CITY ADMINISTRATIONlCathy Wheatley,City Recorder PUBLIC WORKSlJohn Roy,Property Manager _PUBLIC WORKSlMatt Stine,Urban Forester
�PLANNER—POST PROJECT SITE IF A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM-10 BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARINGI
SPECIQLDISTRICTS
TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.♦t�TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE 1� �TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT#� _ CLEANWATER SERVICES+�
Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Lee WalkerlSWM Program
15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N.First Avenue
Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124
LOCAL AND STATE IURISDICTIONS
CITY OF BEAVERTON� CITY OF TUALATIN�MF OR.DEPT.OF FISH 8 WILDLIFE OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS
_ Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue Jennifer Goodridge
_ Irish Bunnell,Devebpmerp Services 18880 SW Martinaui Avenue PO Box 59 775 Summer Street NE
PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Salem,OR 97301-1279
Beaverton,OR 97076
_ OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM.
METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING � _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.8 MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE
_ CITY OF DURHAM � 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380
City Manager Portland.OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232
PO Box 23483 _ Bob Knight,DalaResou�ceCMrter(ZG) US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG.
Durham,OR 97281-3483 _ Paulette Allen,c�owm M�wc�cao�o�m� OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.8�DVLP Kathryn Harris
_ Mel Huie,c��coob��«ccwvzon� Larry French�coRw.a��n�,a�o�y� Routing CENWP-OP-G
CITY OF KING CITY� _ Jennifer Budhabhatti,a��w�,�.�w�u�as� 635 Capitol 5treet NE,Suite 150 PO Box 2946
City Manager _ C.D.Manager,GmwlhManapementServicea Salem,OR 97301-2540 Portland,OR 97208-2946
15300 SW 116th Avenue
King City,OR 97224 WASHINGTON COUNTY�
_ OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY�PO.�enir�es nn�ea> _OR.DEPT OF AVIATION�MOnovoMTOw�n1 Dept.of Land Use&Transp.
Bonneville Power Administration Tom Highland,P�,� 155 N.First Avenue
_CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO� Routing TTRC—Attn: Renae Ferrera 3040 25th Street,SE Suite 350,MS 13
Planning Director PO Box 3621 Salem,OR 97310 Hillsboro.OR 97124
PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 Brent Curtis ccaa�
Lake Oswego,OR 97034 _Gregg Leion ican�
_ OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ODOT,REGION 1 � Anne LaMountain pcauRe�
CITY OF PORTLAND cr,anr r��w�,as�a Po��e����mv'as� _Marah Danielson,o�op�rx Rev+ew cooroa,a�or Phil Healy pcavRe>
Planning Bureau Director Regional Administrator Carl Toland, Right-of-Way Section cv�a�> Steve Conway cc�nvcs.�
1900 SW 4'"Avenue,Suite 4100 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders Sr.Cartographer ccPn,zc.�.�s,.
Portland,OR 97201 Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 Jim Nims czcn�Ms�s
_Doria Mateja acA�Ms+�
WA.CO.CONSOLIDATED COMMUNIC.AGENCY(WCCCA)"911"�MOOOPow Tov..�s� _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A�
Dave Austin Jane Estes,P�a sv�t
PO Box 6375 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350
BeaveRon,OR 97007-0375 Portland,OR 97221-2414
UTILITY PROYIDERS AND SPECIAL A6ENCIES
PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERNISANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R1R(eurlington Nonhern�Santa Fe R/R Predecessor)
Robert I.Melbo,President&General Manager
110 W. tOth Avenue
Albany,OR 97321
SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS COMCAST CABLE CORP. _TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT.
Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer t��onr� Randy Bice (SwM�IVMUCaNCI) (IfProjadisWNlvn'/.MileofaTrans�ROUte)
5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Ben Baldwin,Project Planner
Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 BeaveRon,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street
Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland,OR 97232
�PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC �NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY VERIZON �QWEST COMMUNICATIONS
Ken Gutierrez,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord. Ken Perdue,Engineering Patty Stambaugh,Engineering
9480 SW Bceckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue PO Box 1100 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110
^,Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Beaverton,OR 97075-1100 Portland,OR 97219
�TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 COMCAST CABLE CORP. COMCAST CABLE CORP.
Marsha Butler,Administrative Offices Jan Youngquist,Demographics Alex Silantiev cS..M.,r«A,..o«,�� Diana Carpenter c�.aM.�No���
6960 SW 5andburg Street 16550 SW Merlo Road 9605 SW Nimbus Avenue,Bldg. 12 3500 SW Bond Street
Tigard,OR 97223-8039 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Beaverton,OR 97008 Portland,OR 97232
� INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOYERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN 500'OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANT/ALL
CITY PROJECTS(Project Planne►Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notifr). n:�patty�mastersutequest For Comments Notiflcation�ist.da (UPDATED: 17-Ju1-03)
(Also updale:"i:�curpinl5elupUebels�annexation_utilities and franchises.doc'when updating this documenl)
� �
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITYOFTIGARD
�'anmunity (�eveCoprnent
ShapingA�detterCommunity
I, �PatriciaG. Guns{ord, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a SeniorA�lminutrativeSpeciaCutfor
the �'ity of 7'tgard`GUashirtgton County, Oregon and that I served the following:
{Check Appropnale Box(s)Below}
x❑ NOTICE OF DECISION fOR: MLP2003-00012/FINEVIEW FARM LLC PARTITION
❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference)
� City of Tigard Planning Director
A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked E1[hlbit"A",and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to
each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhlblt"B",and by reference made a part
hereof, on Septemper 17,2003, and deposited in the United States Mail on September 11,2003, postage prepaid.
�
` ' ��'(../
(Person that Prepar Notice
,57,�?E O�F'O�GON )
Coun�y of`Wasjrngton )ss.
C4ty of�Irgard � �'
Subscribed and sworn/affir ed before me on the day of �/G' ��%/'�'G%Z� , 2003.
n
�
OFFICIAL SEAL �
� ��:•o J BENGTSON !f�� �
' NOTARY PUBLIC•OREGON
� COMMIS510N NO.3680IS6 .
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APR.27,2�07
My Commission Expires: � � �
' � EXHIBIT�
NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION
MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2003-00012 �
CITY OF TIGARD
FINEVIEW FARM LLC PARTITION c°""'�u"t�`�����p�n`
� ,S�capingA�etterCommunity
120 DAYS = 12/3/2003
SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY
FILE NAME: FINEVIEW FARM, LLC PARTITION
CASE NO: Minor Land Partition (MLP) MLP2003-00012
PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Minor Land Partition approval to partition a parcel of
land within the city limits of Tigard. The parcel is 1.20 acres. The proposal is to
divide the property into two parcels of 10,094 square feet and 8,933 square feet
with 33,245 square feet in a tract for wetlands. Both parcels will have
approximately 15 feet of frontage along SW 90"' Avenue.
APPLICANT/ Fineview Farm L.L.C. APPLICANT'S REP.: Ed Murphy & Associates
OWNER: Attn: Dan Boyden 9875 SW Murdock Street
1430 Eastside Road Tigard, OR 972224
Hood River, OR 97031
ZONING
DESIGNATION: R-4.5, Low-Density Residential. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to
accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential
units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached
single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses
are also permitted conditionally.
LOCATION: The subject property is located east of SW 90th Avenue, 330 feet south of SW
Locust Street; WCTM 1 S135AA, Tax Lot 1000.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715,
18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
SECTION II. DECISION
Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has
APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the
decision is based are noted in Section V.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00012/FINEVIEW FARM PARTITION PAGE 1 OF 17
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT:
u mit to t e anning epartment at ew c ei egger, , ext. or review an
approval:
1. Submit a plan showing proper screening of the access drive from tax lot 1001 according to
Section 18.745.040 of t�ie Tigard Development Code.
2. Record a reciprocal access easement and maintenance agreement and submit a copy to the
City.
3. Submit a �plan showing the proposed access drive with street trees planted in accordance with
Section 18.745.040.C.
4. Provide a tree plan indicating the protection of all trees to remain and mitigation of trees removed
over 12 inches in diameter prepared by a certified arborist.
5. Provide a fire apparatus turnaround in accordance with Section 18.705.030.(I)(4) of the Tigard
Development Code.
Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and
approval:
6. Prior to commencing onsite improvements, a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is req�uired
for this p_roject to cover the sewer tap and construction and anY other work in the public ri ht-of-
way, 5�x (6�sets of detailed ublic improvement plans.shall be submitted for review �o the
En ineering. , epartment. NO�: these plans are in addition to any drawings reguired by the
Bu�ding Division and should only include sheets relevant to ublic im rovements. Public Facility
Improvement �PFI) permit plans shall conform to City of �igard �ublic Improvement Design
Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ci.tigard.or.us).
7. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number
of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the Permittee , and who will
provide the financial assurance for tl�e public imp rovements. For example,.specify if the entity is
a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. also specify the state within which the entity is
incorporated and rovide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate
information to the�ngineering Department will delay processing of project documents.
8. Prior to final plat approval the applicant shall construct sidewalks along at least one side of the
private street.
9. Prior to final lat a proval, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of $60.00.
(STAFF CON�AC� Shirley Treat, Engineering).
10. The applicant shall execute a Restrictive Covenant whereby they agree to complete or participate
in the future improvements of SW 90th Avenue adjacent to the sub�ect property, when any of the
following events occur:
A. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for by the
formation of a Local Improvement District,
B. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for in whole or in
part by the City or other public agency,
C. when the improvements are par� of a larger project to be constructed by a third party and
involves the shanng of design and/or construction expenses by the third party owner(s} of
property in addition to the subject property, or
D. when construction of the improvements is deemed to be appropriate by the City Engineer
in conjunction with construction of improvements by others ad�acent to the subject site.
11. The final plat shall show the dedication of right-of-way (ROW) on 90th Avenue to provide 27 feet
from centerline.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00012/FINEVIEW FARM PARTITION PAGE 2 OF 17
12. The applicant shall cause a statement to be placed on the final plat to indicate that the proposed
private street(s)will be jointly owned and maintained by the private property owners who abut and
take access from it (them).
13. The applicant's plan shall show a public sewer extension from SW 90th Avenue to the proposed
development.
14. The ap .licant,shall obtain approval from the Tualatin Valley Water District for the proposed water
connec�on prior to issuance of the City's Public Facility Improvement permit.
15. The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to
the City's global posifioning system (GPS) geodetic control network (GC 22). These monuments
shall be on the same line and shall be of t�ie same precision as required for the subdivision plat
boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground
measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates
can be establishedby:
. GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey.
. By random traverse using conventional surveying methods.
16. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements:
A. Submit for City review four (4) paper copies of the final plat prepared by a land surveyor
licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative.
B. Attach a check in the amount of the current final plat review fee (Contact
Planning/En�ineering Permit Technicians, at (503) 639-4171, ext. 2421).
C. The final pla and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by
the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORt�S 92.05), Washington County, and by the City of Tigard.
D. The ri ht-of-way dedication for 90 Avenue shall be made on the final plat.
E. NOT� Washington County will not begin their review of the final plat until they receive
notice from the Engineering Department indicating that the City has reviewed the final plat
and submitted comments to the applicant's surveyor.
F. After the City and County have reviewed the final plat, submit two mylar copies of the final
plat for City Engineer signature (for partitions), or City Engineer and Community
Development Director signatures (for subdivisions).
17. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant's� professional engineer shall provide a sight distance
certification for the proposed access onto SW 90th Avenue.
18. The applicant's construction drawin s shall show.that the pavement and rock section for the
proposed private street(s) shall meet�he City's public street sfandard for a local residential street.
_ ---- —- - --- -
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION:
-�ubmit to t�Engineermg epartment (Kim McMillan, 639-4'�T1, ext. �b�4� or review an
approval:
19. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with
a "photomylar" copy of the recorded final pfat.
20. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide the City with,as-built drawings of
the public improvements as follows: 1) 3 mil mylar, 2) a diskette of the as-builts in "DWG" format,
if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable, and 3) the as-built drawings shall be tied to the
City's GPS network. The applicant's eng ineer shall rovide the City with an electronic file with
points for each structure (manholes catch basins, wa�er valves, hydrants and other water system
features) in the development, and t�eir respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates, referenced
to NAD 83 (91).
21. Any necessary off-site utility easements shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain and
shall be submitted to and accepted by the City prior to issuance of-a building permit.
22. The a�plicant shall provide signage at the entrance of each shared flag lot driveway or private
street hat lists the atldresses �iat are served by the given driveway or street.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00012/FINEVIEW FARM PARTITION PAGE 3 OF 17
23. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW 90th Avenue
underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee
shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and willbe $27.50
per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $412.50 and it shall be paid prior to
issuance of building permifs.
24. Prior to issuance of the building permit for Parcels 1 & 2, the applicant shall pay the standard
water quality and water quantity fees per lot (fee amounts will be the latest approved by Clean
Water Services (CWS).
25. The 25-foot undisturbed buffer shall be shown on the construction plans. The sensitive area
bounda and/or buffer shall be staked in the field throughout the construction process in order to
protect t�e sensitive area.
THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN (18)
MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION NOTED UNDER
THE PROCESS AND APPEAL SECTION OF THIS DECISION.
SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Pro ert Histo :
e su �ect parcel is located within the City of Tigard. The property is designated Low-Density
Residential on the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. A land use application ad�usting lotlines to increase tax
lot 1000 from 4,455 square feet to 52,272 square feet was approved in December of 1999. A minor land
partition application was also applied for and approved in 1999. However, the minor land partition
approval expired. No other land use applications were found to be on file in the City's records.
Site Information and Proposal Descriptions
The applicant is requesting Minor Land Partition approval to partition a parcel of land within the city limits
of Tigard. The parcel is 1.20 acres. The proposal is to divide the property into two parcels of 10,094
square feet and 8,933 square feet with 33,245 square feet in a tract for wetlands. Both parcels will have
approximately 15 feet of frontage along SW 90�' Avenue.
SECTION IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments were received.
SECTION V. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Land Partitions (18.420):
The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations;
The proposed partition will comply with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations at the
time of proposed development as demonstrated both by the analysis presented within this administrative
decision and by this application and review process through compliance with the conditions of approval.
Therefore, this criterion is met.
There are adequate public facilities available to serve the proposal;
Public facilities are discussed in detail later in this decision under Chapter 18.810 (Street & Utility
Improvement Standards). Based on the analysis provided herein, Staff finds that adequate public
facilities are available to serve the proposal. Therefore, this cnterion is met.
All proposed improvements meet City and applicable agency standards;
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00012/FINEVIEW FARM PARTITION PAGE 4 OF 17
The public facilities and proposed improvements are discussed and conditioned later in this decision
under Chapter 18.810 (Street & Utility Improvement Standards). Improvements will be reviewed as part
of the permit process and during construction, at which time the appropriate review authority will ensure
that City and ,applicable agency standards are met. Based on the analysis in this decision, Staff finds
that this criterion is met.
All proposed lots conform to the specific requirements below:
The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable
zoning district.
The minimum lot width requirement in the R-4.5 zoning district is 50 feet. The proposed partition creates
two lots that are an average of 85 feet wide. Therefore, this criterion is satisfied.
The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot, the
accessway may not be included in the lot area.
The minimum lot area requirement in the R-4.5 zoning district is 7,500 square feet. The proposed lots
are 8,933 and 10,094 square feet. The lots are flag lots and do not include the accessway as part of the
total square footage. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied.
Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet
or have a legally recorded minimum 15 foot wide access easement.
The proposed partition shows both Iots having 15 feet of access onto SW 90th Avenue through a private
drive. However, the applicant has indicated that the parcels will share an additional 15-foot access to
the north through cross-over easements. Therefore, tF�e proposed parcels will have 30 feet of frontage
onto SW 90th Avenue. This standard has been met.
Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district.
No development is proposed in conjunction with this application. Setback requirements will be applied at
time of development. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied.
When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard,
provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to
maximize separation from existing structures.
No development is associated with this application. Therefore, this standard can be deferred until the
time of development.
A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an
accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.745.040.
Screening may also be required to maintain pr�vacy for abutting lots and to provide usable
outdoor recreation areas for proposed development.
The proposed access drive is within 10 feet of tax lot 1001 to the south. No screening has been
proposed. Therefore, a plan showing tax lot 1001 properly screened according to Section 18.745.040
will be conditioned.
The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway
would have a detrimental effect on fire-fighting capabilities.
The Fire District has no conflicts with the partition as proposed. This criterion will apply only when
structures are developed on the vacant parcels.
Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one lot, a reciprocal easement
which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition
map.
The access drive associated with this application serves both of the proposed lots. By combining the
access with the abutting access drive of MLP2003-00011, to the north, �oint access easements and
maintenance rights will need to be established by the applicant.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00012/FINEVIEW FARM PARTITION PAGE 5 OF 17
Any access way shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.705, Access, Egress and
Circulation.
This standard is addressed in greater detail under Chapter 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation)
below.
Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the one-hundred year
floodplain, the city shall rec�uire consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for
greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable
elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance
with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan.
The sub1'ect site is not located within or adjacent to the 100-year floodplain. Therefore, this standard
does nof apply.
An application for a variance to the standards prescribed in this chapter shall be made in
accordance with Chapter 18.370, Variances and Adjustments. The applications for the partition
and variance(s)/adjustment(s) will be processed concurrently.
No variances or adjustments are associated with this application.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff can not confirm that the Land Partition standards have
been satisfied, however, if the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the
standards will be met:
CONDITIONS:
. Submit a plan showing proper screening of the access drive from tax lot 1001
according to Section 18.745.040 of the Tigard Development Code.
. Record a reciprocal access easement and maintenance agreement and submit a
copy to the City.
Residential Zonin Districts 18.510:
eve opmen s an ar s in resi en ial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.510.2 below:
TABLE 18.510.2
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES
STANDARD R-�.5
Minimum Lot Size
-Detached unit 7,500 sq.ft.
-Duplexes 10,000 sq.ft.
-Attached unit 1
Average Minimum Lot Width
-Detached unit lots 50 ft.
-Duplex lots 90 ft.
-Attached unit lots
Maximum Lot Covera e -
Minimum Setbacks
-Front yard 20 ft.
-Side facing sUeet on
comer&through lots 15 ft.
-Side yard 5 ft.
-Rear yard 15 ft.
-Side or rear yard abutting more
restrictive zoning district
-Distance between property line
and front of ara e 20 ft.
Maximum Hei ht 30 ft.
Minimum Landscape Re uirement -
[1]Single-family attached residential units permitted at one dwelling per lot with no more that five attached units in one grouping.
[2]Lot coverage indudes all buildings and impervious surfaces.
The above standards are deferred until time of development.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00012/FINEVIEW FARM PARTITION PAGE 6 OF 17
Access, Eqress and Circulation (18.705):
Continuing obli�ation of property owner. The provisions and maintenance of access and e ress
stipulated in this title are continuing requirements or the use of any structure or parcel o� real
property in the City.
Access Plan requirements. No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are
presented an approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and
circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director
shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement.
The applicant has indicated that access will be shared with the finro newly created parcels of
MLP2003-00011 (Pacific Crest Partners Partition). Therefore, four parcels will be using the same
access through crossover and access easements. The access is proposed.to be 30 feet with 20 feet of
pavement, which connects to SW 90th Avenue. This standard has been satisfied.
Joint Access. Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize
jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses,
structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title,
provided: Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases
or contracts to establish the joint use; and copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts
are placed on permanent file with the City.
The pro osed parcels will share access. The applicant has been conditioned earlier under Chapter
18.420 �Land Partitions) to provide documentation that establishes access and maintenance rights for
the individual parcels. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied.
Public street access. All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and
18.705.0301 shall connect directly with a public or private street approve by the City for public
use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis.
The proposed parcels will have access onto SW 90th Avenue by means of a 30-foot access drive with
20 feet of pavement. The applicant has been conditioned under Chapter 18.420 (Land Partitions) to
show satisfactory evidence that each parcel has the legal right to use the existing access. Therefore,
this standard has been satisfied.
Inadequate or hazardous access. Applications for building permits shall be referred to the
Commission for review when, in the opinion of the Director, fhe access proposed: Would cause
or increase existing hazardous tra�c conditions; or would provide inadequate access for
emergency vehicles; or would in any other way cause hazardous conditions to exist which
would constitute a clear and present danger to the public health, safety, and .general welfare.
Direct individual access to arterial or collector streets from single-family dwellings and duplex
lots shall be discouraged. Direct access to major collector or arterial streets shall be considered
only if there is no practical alternative way to access the site. In no case shall the design of the
service drive or drives require or facilitate the backward movement or other maneuvering of a
vehicle within a street, other than an alley. Single-family and duplex dwellings are exempt from
this requirement.
The proposed lots will take access from a private drive that connects to SW 90th Avenue which is a local
street. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue did not indicate that the access to the site is in any way
hazardous or constitute a clear and present danger. Therefore, this standard does not apply.
Access Manaqement (Section 18.705.030.H)
ec ion . . . s a es a an access report shall be submitted with all new development
proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking
needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washingfon County, the City
and AASHTO.
The applicant has indicated in the narrative that vision clearance areas can be met and that sight
distance to the north is currently unobstructed. The applicant's engineer shall provide sight distance
certification for the proposed shared access prior to approval of the final plat.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00012/FINEVIEW FARM PARTITION PAGE 7 OF 17
Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be Qlaced in the influence
area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where
queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway
setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be150 feet, measured from the righf-
of-way line of the intersectin� street to the throat of the proposed drivewa�. The setback may be
�reater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic
impact report submitted b the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less
than 150 feet of street fron�age, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the
adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far
from the intersection as possible.
Both Oak and Locust Streets are classified as collector streets. The proposed shared access onto gptn
Avenue is located approximately 310 feet from Locust Street and 450 feet from Oak Street, thereby
meeting this criterion.
Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a
collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall
be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet.
SW 90th Avenue is classified as a local street; therefore this standard does not apply to the proposed
d riveway.
Access drives in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the
turning around of fire apparatus by one of the following: a) A circular, paved surface having a
minimum turn radius measured from center point to outside edge of 35 feet; b) A hammerhead-
configured, paved surface with each leg of the hammerhead having a minimum depth of 40 feet
and a minimum width of 20 feet; c) The maximum cross slope of a required turnaround is 5%.
The access drive is approximately 157 feet in len th. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide a
fire apparatus turnaround in accordance with 18.70�.030.(I)(4) of the Tigard Development Code.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds the Access, Egress and Circulation Standards
have been met.
CONDITION: Provide a fire apparatus turnaround in accordance with 18.705.030.(I)(4) of the Tigard
Development Code.
Density Computations (18.715):
Definition of net develo ment area. Net development area, in acres, shall be determined by
su rac ing e o owing an area s) from the gross acres, which is all of the land included in
the legal description of the property to be developed:
1. All sensitive land areas:
a. Land within the 100-year floodplain;
b. Land or slopes exceeding 25%;
c. Drainage ways; and
d. Wetlands.
2. All land dedicated to the public for park purposes;
3. All land dedicated for public rights-of-way. When actual information is not available, the
followin� formulas may be used:
a. Single-family development: allocate 20% of gross acreage;
b. Mul}i-family development: allocate 15% of gross acreage.
4. All land proposed for private streets; and
5. A lot of at least the size required by the applicable base zoning district, if an existing
dwelling is to remain on the site.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00012/FINEVIEW FARM PARTITION PAGE 8 OF 17
Calculatin maximum number of residential units. To calculate the maximum number of
resi en ia uni s per ne acre, ivi e e num er o square feet in the net acres by the minimum
number of square feet required for each lot in the applicable zoning district.
Calculatin minimum number of residential units. As required by Section 18.510.040, the
minimum num er o resi en ia uni s per ne acre shall be calculated by multiplying the
maximum number of units determined in 5ubsection B above by 80% (0.8).
The standards for density computation deal with the intensity of residential land uses, usually stated
as the number of housing units per acre. The total square footage of the sub'ect pro erty is 52,272
square feet. However, to determine the net developable area, the square foo�age of �he accessway
�2 355 square feet� is subtracted as it is excluded from the lot area per Tigard Development Code
TbC) Section 18. 20.089�) along with the existing wetland of 33 245 square feet. This results in a
net developable area of 1 ,672 square feet. As tFie minimum lo� size for the R-4.5 zone is 7,500
square feet, the maximum number of residential units is two (2). The minimum number of residential
units is one (1). The applicant is proposing a two (2) lot partition. Therefore, the density for the
subject property has been met.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Density Computation Standards have been met.
Landscapinq and Screeninq (18.745):
Street trees: Section 18.745.040
ec ion . 45.040.A.: All development projects fronting on a public street, private street or a
private driveway more than 100 feet in length approved after the adoption of this title shall be
required to plant street trees in accordance with the standards in Section 18.745.040C.
The proposed access is approximately 157 feet in length; according to the standard, driveways in
excess of one-hundred (100) feet in length are required to have street trees. Therefore, the applicant is
required to submit a plan showing the proposed access drive with street trees planted in accordance
with Section 18.745.040.C.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Landscaping and Screening Standards have not been
met.
CONDITION: Submit a plan showing the proposed access drive with street trees planted in accordance
with Section 18.745.040.C.
Tree Removal (18.790):
ree p an or e p anting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall
be provided for any lot„ parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development
application for a subdivision, partition site development review, planned development or
conditional use is filed. Protection is pre�erred over removal wherever possible.
The applicant has not addressed tree mitigation or protection of trees to remain. Therefore, the
applicant is required to provide a tree plan indicating the protection of all trees to remain and
mitigation of trees removed over 12 inches in diameter prepared by a certified arborist.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Landscaping and Screening Standards have not been
met.
CONDITION:Provide a tree plan indicating the protection of all trees to remain and mitigation of trees
removed over 12 inches in diameter prepared by a certified arborist.
Visual Clearance Areas 18.795 :
ThisZ, apter requires t at a c ear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property
adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private
driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or
temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that
obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight
8 feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight
8 feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a
-foot distance points with a straight line.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00012/FINEVIEW FARM PARTITION PAGE 9 OF 17
The applicant's plans show no obstructions within the visual clearance triangles associated with the
partition.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Staff finds that the Vision Clearance Standards have been
met.
IMPACT STUDY (18.390.040):
l�equires a e appTic� shall include an impact study. The study shall address, at a
minimum, the transportation system, including bikewa�s, the drainage system, the parks
system, the water system, the sewer system, and the noise impacts of the development. For
each public facility system and type of impact of the development on the public at large, public
facilities systems, and affected pr�vate property users. In situations where the Community
Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either
specifically concur with the dedication of real property interest, or provide evidence which
supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly
proportional to the projected impacts of the development.
The applicant has submitted an Impact Study that addresses the following systems:
Trans ortation S stem:
ere are lust un er trips per day generated from a single-family detached home. There will be two
homes built on this property as a result of this partition, which will add almost 20 trips per day onto SW
90th Avenue, a local street and other streets such as SW Locust, a collector street. No new streets will
be created. This amount of traffic on the existing streets would not be considered significant, or de�rade
the level of service on the street. There is nothmg in the Transportation System plan indicatin a
capacity,problem in this area. (The closest recommended improvements are improvements to �he
intersection of SW Hall and SW Oak, widening of SW Hall to five lanes, and widening of SW Greenburg
north of SW Locust to five lanes). No dedication of right-of-way is necessary, according to the City
Engineer.
SW Hall, which is only about 1,300 feet away from this development, is a transit route.
There are no bicycle lanes on SW 90th Avenue, or on any of the nearby streets. No bikeways are
identified on the pedestrian/bikeway.plan through this property. The amount of bicycle traffic that will be
generated from the two new homes is not significant.
The new homes will contribute to the funds available for system-wide improvements through payment of
the Transportation Improvement Fee (TIF).
Draina e S stem:
e property rains to the east and south, towards the wetland area. Drainage from the shared
driveway wilf be piped to the edge of the wetland through a 12-inch concrete pipe, and then released into
a riprap pad. The site plan will accommodate the upstream drainage adjacent to this development. The
partition will not significantly increase the amount of runoff into the public system. Clean Water Services
has already provided a service letter, accepting the proposed drainage system. The new homes will
contribute to the funds available for system-wide improvements through payment of the water quality fee
(in-lieu of).
Park S stem:
ere wi e some use of nearby parks, such as Metzger Park. Residents may also use the school
grounds during non-school hours. The new homes will contribute to the funds available for system-wide
park improvements through payment of the System Development Charge (SDC).
Water S stem:
e water system has the capacity to serve this development. There are two public water lines available
in SW 90th Avenue, a 16-inch line and a 6-inch line. There will be no significant impact to the water
system as a result of this finro-lot development. The new homes will contribute to the funds available for
system-wide improvements through payment of the Sewer SDC.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00012/FINEVIEW FARM PARTITION PAGE 10 OF 17
Sewer S stem:
e sewer system has the capacity to serve this development. There is an existing sewer main in SW
90th Avenue. There will be no significant impact to the sewer system as a result of this two-lot
development. The new homes will contribute to the funds available for system-wide improvements
through payment of the Sewer SDC.
Noise Im acts:
ere wi e construction-related noise generated during construction of the driveway and utilities, and
then the homes. After construction, there will be no significant noise impact on the neighborhood.
Rough Proportionality:
Any required street improvements to certain collector or higher volume streets and the Washington
County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) are mitigation measures that are required at the time of development.
Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan
II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development
on the Collector and Arterial Street system. Presently, the TIF for each trip that is generated is $239.00.
The total TIF for a single-family dwelling is $2,390 per unit.
U pon completion of this development, the future builders of the residences will be required to pay TIF's
of approximately $4,780 ($2,390 x 2 single-family dwelling units. Based on the estimate that total TIF
fees cover 32 percent of the impact on ma�or street improvements cit ide, a fee that would cover 100
percent of this projects traffic impact is $14,937 ($4,780 divided by .32�The difference befinreen the TIF
paid and the full impact, is considered an unmitigated impact. Since the TIF paid is $4,780, the
unmitigated impact can be valued at $10,157. Given that the estimated cost of the dedication is $90.00
($3.00 x 30 square feet), the requirement to make these improvements falls within the limits of
proportionality to the impact of the development.
PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS
Street And Utilitv Improvements Standards Section 18.810 :
ap er . proviaes cons ruc ion s an ar s or e implementation of public and private
facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are
addressed below:
Streets:
Improvements:
Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be
improved in accordance with the TDC standards.
Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion
of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC.
Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a local street to have a
54 right-of-way width and 32-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-
street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage,
and street trees.
This site lies adjacent to SW 90�' Avenue, which is classified as a local street on the City of Tigard
Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 25 feet of ROW from centerline, according
to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate ROW to provide 27 feet from
centerline.
SW 90�' Avenue is currently paved, but not fully improved to City standards. In order to mitigate the
impact from this development, the applicant should sign a Restrictive Covenant for future street
improvements.
Future Street Plan and Extension of Streets: Section 18.810.030.F states that a future street plan
shall be filed which shows the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the
boundaries of the proposed land drvision. This section also states that where it is necessary to
give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00012/FINEVIEW FARM PARTITION PAGE 11 OF 17
the boundary lines of the tract to be developed and a barricade shall be constructed at the end of
the street. These street stubs to adjoining properties are not considered to be cul-de-sacs since
they are intended to continue as through streets at such time as the adjoining property is
developed. A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the property owners
which shall not be removed until authorized by the City Engineer, the cost of which shall be
included in the street construction cost. Temporary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de-
sac bulbs shall be constructed for stub streets in excess of 150 feet in length.
The applicant has indicated that there is not an opportunity for future street connections through this
development due to the wetlands area on the west side of this property. Staff concurs wi�h this
assessment.
Private Streets: Section 18.810.030.T states that design standards for private streets shall be
established by the City Engineer. The City shall require legal assurances for the continued
maintenance of private streets, such as a recorded maintenance agreement. Private streets
serving more than six dwelling units are permitted only within planned developments, mobile
home parks, and multi-family residential developments.
The applicant has indicated that this partition will provide a 10-foot paved shared access within a 15-foot
easement. The applicant has also indicated that fhe adjacent partition will be providing the same section
on their property. The two combined will provide a 20-foot private street within a 30-foot access
easement be recorded such that all four properties created will have full use of the entire private street.
The applicant shall place a statement on the face of the final plat indicating the private street(s) will be
owned and maintained by the properties that will be served by iUthem. The City's public improvement
design standards require private streets to have a pavement section equal to a public local street. The
applicant will need to provide this type of pavement section.
Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be
desi�ned with due regard to providing adequate buifding sites for the use contemplated,
consideration of needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and
recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography.
Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall
not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of-way line except:
. Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of
water or, pre�xistin development or;
. For blocks adjacen� to arterial streets, limited access highways, major collectors or
railroads.
. For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access.
The location of the proposed access drive is precluded from extending to SW Maple Court to the east by
a wetland. Therefore this standard does not apply.
Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements
or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is not possible. Spacing between
connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where �recluded by environmental or
topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards
in the code.
As mentioned above, connection of the proposed private street to SW Maple Court to the east is
precluded by an existing wetland. Therefore, this standard does not apply.
Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from bein� more than 2.5 times
the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the
applicable zoning district.
The average lot width for the proposed parcels is approximately 80 feet. Therefore, the depth of the
proposed lots cannot exceed 200 feet. The applicant's plans show the lots to be no more than 125 feet
deep at the furthest point from the front of the fots. This criterion has been satisfied.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-0�012/FINEVIEW FARM PARTITION PAGE 12 OF 17
Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public
or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies,
which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide
recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit,
the frontage shall be at least 15 feet.
The smallest of the proposed parcels has approximately 35 feet of frontage onto the proposed private
street, which connects to SW 90th Avenue. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied.
Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design
standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private
streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side.
The applicant will be required to sign a Restrictive Covenant for future street improvements, which will
include the construction of sidewalks along the frontage of SW 90'h Avenue.
The private street that will serve the four lots (2 lots for this partition and 2 lots for the adjacent partition)
will be required to construct sidewalks on at least one side.
Sanitary Sewers:
Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each
new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the
provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water
Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or
amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan.
Over-siziny: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include
consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive
Plan.
The applicanYs plan indicate that a new, 8-inch public sewer will be constructed from the sewer in 90�'
Avenue to the lots. A public easement will be required for a portion of the sewer line. The applicant will
be required to provide a copy of the recorded easement prior to construction.
Storm Drainage:
General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for
storm water and flood water runoff.
Accommodation of U pstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other
drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream
drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the
necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for
Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and
including any future revisions or amendments).
There is no significant upstream drainage way. Any upstream runoff entering the project access area
will be collected in the proposed catch basin.
Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the
City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing
draina�e facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until
provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have
been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the
Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by
Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments).
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00012/FINEVIEW FARM PARTITION PAGE 13 OF 17
In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno
Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local
governments institute a sformwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no
net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments
resulting in an increase of impervious surFaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the
development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the
storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention.
Developments of this small size, especially residential land partitions, are not required to provide on-site
detention. The applicant will be required to pay the water quantity SDC upon application for the building
permits.
The applicant's plans indicate that runoff will be collected and discharged to the existing wetland to the
west. The plans provide for a rip-rap outfall for energy dissipation and erosion control.
Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways:
Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed
bikeways identifed on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for
the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way.
SW 90th Avenue is not designated as a bicycle facility.
Utilities:
Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric,
communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed
underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and
meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, tem porary utility service facilities during
construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and:
. The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide
the underground services;
. The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities;
. All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets
by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surtacing of the streets; and
. Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street
improvements when service connections are made.
Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall
pay a fee in-lieu of under-�rounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a
street where existing utilities which are not under round will serve the development and the
approval authority determines that the cost and �echnical difficult�r of under-g rounding the
utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the deveiopment. The
determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such
situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the
placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An
applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which
are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of
under-grounding.
There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW 90`h Avenue. If the fee in-lieu is
proposed, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The
frontage along this site is 15 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $412.50.
ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT
Public Water S stem:
ua a in a ey a.er District provides public, water service in this area. The applicant will need to
contact TV Water Distract for a new water service upon construction of the new homes.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00012/FINEVIEW FARM PARTITION PAGE 14 OF 17
Storm Water Qualit :
e i y as agree to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM� regulations established by
Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards adopted by Resolution and
Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities
shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm
water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan
shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility
maintained through the year.
The CWS standards include a provision that would exclude small projects such as residential land
partitions. It would be impractical to require an on-site water quality facility to accommodate treatment of
the storm water from 2 parcels. Rather, the CWS standards provide that applicants should pay a fee
in-lieu of constructing a facility, if deemed appropriate. Staff recommends payment of the fee in-lieu on
this application.
Address Assi nments:
e i y o igar is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within
the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30.00 per address shall be
assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to final plat approval.
For this project, the addressing fee will be $60.00 (2 lots and/or tracts X $30/address = $60.00).
The developer will also be required to provide signage at the entrance of each shared flag lot driveway
or private street that lists the addresses that are served by the given driveway or street. This will assist
emergency services personnel to more easily find a particular home.
Surve Re uirements
e app ican s ina p at shall contain State Plane Coordinates [NAD 83 (91)] on finro monuments with a
tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network (GC 22). These monuments
shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat
boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground
measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be
established by:
. GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey.
. By random traverse using conventional surveying methods.
In addition, the ap p,licant's as-built drawings shall be tied to the GPS network. The applicant's engineer
shall provide the City with an electronic file with points for each structure (manholes, catch basins, water
valves, hydrants and other water system features in the development, and their respective X and Y
State Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD 83 (91�.
SECTION VI. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS
City of Tigard Water Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it.
City of Tigard Long Range Planning Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections.
City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it.
City of Tigard Building Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it.
SECTION VII. AGENCY COMMENTS
Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments.
As per the applicants request, the conditions in this approval letter are based on both homes
being protected with automatic fire sprinklers installed in accordance with NFPA 13D.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2003-00012/FINEVIEW FARM PARTITION PAGE 15 OF 17
�� FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD DISTANCE FROM BUILDING AND TURNAROUNDS: Access
roa s s a e wit in eet o a portions o t e exterior wa o t e irst story o t e uilding as
measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building. An approved turnaround is
required if the remainin� distance to an approved intersecting roadway, as measured along the fire
apparatus access road, is greater than 150 feet. (UFC Sec. 902.2.1)
r�o turnaround will be required for fire appara�us.
z� FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD WIDTH AND VERTICAL CLEARANCE: Fire apparatus access
roa s s a ave an uno structe wi t o not ess t an eet eet or one or two dwelling
units and out buildinqs), and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches.
(UFC Sec. 902.2.2.1) �IVhere fire,apparatus roadways are less than 28 feet wide, "NO PARKING"
signs shall be installed on both sides of the roadway and in turnarounds as needed. Where fire
apparatus roadways are more than 28 feet wide but less than 32 feet wide, "NO PARKING" signs
shall be installed on one side of the roadway and in turnarounds as needed. Where fire apparatus
roadways are 32 feet wide or more, parking is not restricted. (UFC Sec. 902.2.4)
3� SURFACE AND LOAD CAPACITIES: Fire apparatus access roads shall be of an all-weather
su ace t at is easi y istinguis a e rom the surrounding area and is capable of supporting not less
than 12,500 pounds point load (wheel load) and 50,000 pounds live load (gross vehicle weight). You
may need to provide. documen�ation from a registered engineer that the design will be capable of
supporting such loading. Documentation from a registered engineer that the finished construction is
in accordance with the approved plans or the requirements of the Fire Code may be requested.
(Design criteria on back) (UFC Sec. 902.2.2)
a> TURNING RADIUS: The inside turning radius and outside turning radius shall be not less than 25
eet an eet respectively, measured from the same center point. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.3)
s> NO PARKING SIGNS: Where fire apparatus roadways are not of sufficient width to accommodate
par e ve ic es an feet of unobstructed driving surface, "No Parking" signs shall be installed on
one or both sides of the roadway and in turnarounds as needed. (UFC Sec. 902.2.4) Signs shall
read "NO PARKING - FIRE LANE - TOW AWAY ZONE, ORS 98.810 - 98.812" and shall be installed
with a clear space above grade level of 7 feet. Signs shall be 12 inches wide by 18 inches high and
shall have black or red letters and border on a white background. (UFC Sec. 901.4.5.1) – (See
diagram on back)
s> GRADE: Private fire apparatus access roadway grades shall not exceed an average grade of 10
percent with a maximum grade of 15 percent for lengths of no more than 200 feet. Infersections and
turnarounds shall be level (maximum 5%� with the exception of crowning for water run-off. Public
streets shall have a maximum grade of 15/o. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.6)
�> SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES - FIRE HYDRANTS: Fire hXdrants for single family
we ings, up exes an su - ivisions, s a e p ace a eac intersection. Intermediate fire
hydranfs are required if any portion of a structure exceeds 500 feet from a hydrant at an intersection
as measured in an approved manner around the outside of the structure and along approved fire
apparatus access roadways. Placement of additional fire hydrants shall be as approved by the
Chief. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.2)
s� SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS - REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: The minimum available fire flow for
sing e ami y we ings an up exes s a e , ga ons per minute. If the structure(s) is(are)
3,600 square feet or larger, the required fire flow shall be determined according to UFC Appendix
Table A-III-A-1. (UFC Appendix III-A, Sec. 5)
s� ACCESS AND FIRE FIGHTING WATER SUPPLY DURING CONSTRUCTION: Approved fire
apparatus access roa ways an ire ig tin� water supp ies s a e insta e an operational prior to
any other construction on the site or subdivision. (UFC Sec. 8704)
SECTION VIII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION
Notice: Notice was mailed to:
X The applicant and owners
� Owner of record within the required distance
�— Affected government agencies
NOTICE OF DECI510N MLP2003-00012/FINEVIEW FARM PARTITION PAGE 16 OF 17
Final Decision:
THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON SEPTEMBER 17, 2003 AND BECOMES
EFFECTIVE ON OCTOBER 2, 2003 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED.
�Ap�eal:
The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are
otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may
appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development
Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director
within ten (10) business days of the date the-Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule
and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard,
Oregon 97223.
Unless the applicant,is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be
confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the
comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may
be submitfed by any party during the appeal hearing, sub�ect to any additional rules of procedure that
may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body.
THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON OCTOBER 1, 2003.
Questions:
yoT��e any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW
Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171.
September 17, 2003
PREPARED BY: Mathew Scheidegger DATE
Associate Planner
c�,�•��j7 • September 17, 2003
APPROVED BY: Richard H. Bewersd DATE
Planning Manager
i/curplNmathew/mlp/mIp2003-00012.dec
NOTICE OF DECI510N MLP2�03-00012/FINEVIEW FARM PARTITION PAGE 17 OF 17
W L
� � �
� GEOGRnPHiC iNFOliMnT�ON Sv5'EM
I
1/IQNITY M�U� '
CORAL gT = _ _ __ _ _ _
° MLP2003-00012
0
o °o
°o ° _
0
00 � � � �� � � �
0 0
°° f INEVIEW FARM LLC
00
°o°o pARTITION
T ST j
� ¢
�
O
�
0
>
J
m
MAPLELEAF ST Q �
�� Q � ��. MAPL r :s=E�
SITE ��� �
� � ' ��� ,��
� �,
\ 4 � r ,t
� — ti-/E_� `�" �` �✓" i
1�?� /�� �< 1 � �,� �
;'%_..,_. 's� �—_ ,.�,, t;..� "�
�, '=.' � ; � !
��'.��, �-- �: �t:_._
2 = ; .TT.---�P . �Sfl=NITF��D
� �..__'___' .._. J: E : �
� � i � � lo�,�
r �.
� J Ln �c 3E�iD HD% �. i RO
J � _.,_ .. .
n� �__ 3l_ '.' . :
Q �
J = a�'� ... �
� TgarC Arra Map , ( ;
ST
�
O N
0 100 200 300 Feel
1'=249 fcet
PINE ST
City of Tigard
Informatio�m this map is fa general localion only and
should be verifieA with ihe Oevedaprnent Services Divisim.
13125 SW Hall Blvd
Tgard,OR 97223
(503)639-41)1
-- ht�7/xv.w.ci.tigard.a.us
Community Development Plot date:Aug 8,2003;C:Unagic\MAGIC03.APR
I W I ' � � I Z �
� Z � i i---------L- -----------1 N I
� W �--------�- I I W � TL 600 �
� Q I � � ------- TL 805 � � I i
� i r____ 1 i W � i �
� = I � TL 902 � TL 905 � � � I /
I o I I I ---� � I � i
i °' i i i �------- i �, i �
I 3 � TL 806 � � �
tnl �-------- � � I /
I I -----------� I �
TL 100 � � TL 901 TL 1000 I � I �
� � � TL 800 � � � //
� I i
� � L- ---r� v
I I � /' � i/
I / i
----------� � I � ( i
--- ._,/ r---------
1APLE STREET � i
— — — u f 05' 159'
100' ' �'
� rL 1001 S'• �0 i� �30� � . TRACT 'A"
-----------� • TL 590
I I bi Porcel 1 j.•.-�.�o oesoc e5t.
� � Net 8.93J sq./t. �� - ' .l 1,'•`
� I `�. Gross: 11,297 sq./t. p '.�. . . .
I � �S�'\ / i: �.'•.•.•.� .-�••�
TL 100 � I -------- f ...`.:.:.:.. . . ..
� �-- � Parcef 2 � • - • • :j�/�• �J �
� I � 10.094 sq./t. }� .' �S�',',',' '/ /' �`P'
� . . . . � V
j /.'�`�. . . pF
� � TL 1002 ti� ,. .'.'.',..'_ ".'�' �`' '� ---- -
I I /::•.- . .� ' �' G� �-
I � ��' -• Q-� i�I
I G-- -- aa' ez , �
/ I
� � � -i/ -- QQ'-- � I
I � ! P\�� �� I
� I I TL 1101 'I � � �
I � Q i
I � �.l �� i �
I � � •_� ��0 i� �
� ' 0P i� I
I ,
� �-- -�---- P ��� i
� � TL 1102 I TL 110a � TL 401 �i I
I
� � I I �i /i I
� � TL 1200 I
1 � � ��/ ��/ �
I I �
I � � ��/ ��/ �
-----------� L----------�-----� -------J-
� ��-----------
. � •
Fineview Farm LLC
EXHIBIT�
Attn: Dan Boyden MLP2003-00012
1430 Eastside Road FINEVIEW FARM LLC PARTITION
Hood River, OR 97031
Ed Murphy & Associates
9875 SW Murdock Street
Tigard, OR 97224
.,,_.
AFFI DAVIT O F MAILI HG CITY OF TIGARD
C'omrauriity,Ueuelopmetit
,S6apingA�etteiCommunity
I, �PatriciaG. Gunsf ord, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a SeniorAdministrativeSpeciaCutfor
the �'ity of rl'tgarri, `INasFiington County, Oregon and that I served the following:
{Check Appropnate Boz(s)Below)
❑x NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: MLP2003-00012/FINEVIEW FARM LLC PARTITION
❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference)
� City of Tigard Planning Director
A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhlbl["A",and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to
each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Ellhlblt"B",and by reference made a part
hereof, on Septemqer 17,2003,and deposited in the United States Mail on September 11,2003, postage prepaid.
. �"j
(Person that Pre are ' e)
,S`xA`ItE O�F O�GON )
County of`Wasjrngton )ss.
Ci�y of 2igard )
Subscribed and sworn/affi ed before me on the day of V�J����G��/!� , 2003.
����
OF��GIAL SEAL
.,; ` ,p J BENQTSON �� �
'" / NOTARY PU9UUOREGON Nh�Commission Expires:
CQMMISSION NO.3680a6
' MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APR.27,20U7
, EXHIBIT
NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION
MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2003-00012
CITY OF TIGARD
FINEVIEW FARM LLC PARTITION c'°mmu„``'';°`Ue�pment
� S�aping,a Better�'ornmunity
120 DAYS = 12/3/2003
SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY
FILE NAME: FINEVIEW FARM, LLC PARTITION
CASE NO: Minor Land Partition (MLP) MLP2003-00012
PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Minor Land Partition approval to partition a parcel of
land within the city limits of Tigard. The parcel is 1.20 acres. The proposal is to
divide the property into two parcels of 10,094 square feet and 8,933 square feet
with 33,245 square feet in a tract for wetlands. Both parcels will have
approximately 15 feet of frontage along SW 90th Avenue.
APPLICANT/ Fineview Farm L.L.C. APPLICANT'S REP.: Ed Murphy & Associates
OWNER: Attn: Dan Boyden 9875 SW Murdock Street
1430 Eastside Road Tigard, OR 972224
Hood River, OR 97031
ZONING
DESIGNATION: R-4.5, Low-Density Residential. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to
accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential
units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached
single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses
are also permitted conditionally.
LOCATION: The subject property is located east of SW 90t" Avenue, 330 feet south of SW
Locust Street; WCTM 1 S135AA, Tax Lot 1000.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715,
18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
SECTION II. DECISION
Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has
APPROVED the above request. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted
in the full decision, available at City Hall.
THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS
FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION.
All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or
copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25�) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the
time of the request.
SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION
Notice:
otice mailed to:
X The applicant and owners
—� Owner of record within the required distance
�— Affected government agencies
Final Decision:
THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON SEPTEMBER 17, 2003 AND BECOMES
EFFECTIVE ON OCTOBER 2, 2003 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED,
A�peal:
The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are
otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may
appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community
Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed
with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The
appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW
Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223.
Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be
confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the
comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may
be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that
may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body.
THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON OCTOBER 1, 2003.
Questions:
For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Mathew Scheideqger at
(503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223.
� ............e.............
- - - -- �na�r w�n
o«� s =_______
� MLP2003-00012
� FINEYIEW FARM LLC
PARTITION
T S7 W
>
� a
>
� m
w
2 MAPLELEAF ST ; \,\�.,'»:i,�..,, ¢
;,�' ITE''' I §
, ��::
� ��� �
- _ _ ` —
�
k J �....+�p .
� �
ry
� �.vu �
PINE ST �
Ciry ot riped
.r�..+�..h.+
\ ryra V n9�
_—"___ ._— --____ -�—� l _ _ —.. _ ____—_ _ __—
Iw 1 ' r___ ____� 12 I
I 2 I I � "'
I 1 � I �-"___________ � � �
I � r______
--�-1 I �p � il 600 '
� a i i f__'__'_____1 n eos � � i �
;o I i n eoz i n aos � � 'S' i ��
� � _'___'� 3 � '
i i � r--- � � � .
� � '
m� L'----- � n eos � � •
nioo ' i _________'� '
' n vo� n�000 � � �
.
i � � i � �
�S � i � rt eoo � �
, ; �J ,:
� � , , �
I 1 L_________�
I � i /
__________J 1 I � � � i
�APIE STRFET � .___.:,/ r I _____________
y �
__________� i �i tOOi '•. ;���l01 Y lRACi'A'
n seo
� Y •r vwcN 1 j'- r\oi�.�.
I ` om rin "�-�'� ;".�'
I
I �'
I ��.41l]pp^9
� i m,� / !'' .i...'1
.���� I ' ---- oo.<.qs • '�: �
1
�___ i(/.'.� 1
i i �,g y ...'...''•., '
. n :'
� I I .�'✓''.'.'.'.:1:.' i�
� � ll IW] /'�.'.'.".'-••"
I I �� ..".' ..^.. .�
. . • 1
._ ____
I � � .�..'.".'.: ' � �f_______________
�_'_____" '. _ p0
� I
' _�0'__ i
I
� Il 1101 �1 pP� I
� � �� I
7�.
1 � 1 � � i a
i
r
. ` i
� I 1 .'.' �PS i I
� �__________f____________ ,� ' � 1
i ;
R 11a] R 1100 R�Ol
I � � iL 1]00 1
1 i i
i �
I I I i� �� 1
� � 1 ' � �
i
� � � � ' i �
________._' L__________L____��
- �__________________J__
___
__ i
______'_._/s �______.______G_______ __'___-r__
� fr______T_—_____
.,� �ITY oF T�6ARD � MLP2003-00012
�°� N FINEVIEW FARM, LLC PARTITION
�s�a m.�ww
ileli'•/.-�R..:jt..i.Yiu_iMGIY_:.�Yn,Yi�fl...�e"- �I•'. �.5.'iwh'�•:•.a' �Jf:� . . . .. . .. .. .Y..d La.u. •_. i�i'r.Y.
ADDER Y DAVID L&SHARON A BUTORI EUGENE F TRUST& EXHIBIT�
9120 SW LOCUST ST BUTORI VIRGINIA A TRUST
TIGARD,OR 97223 BY BUTORI EUGENE FNIRGINIA A TRS
7645 SW CEDAR
PORTLAND,OR 97225
1 S 135AA-05000 1 S 135AA-048o0
ALBERTSON RICHARD D CAGE JUDITH K
10255 SW 87TH 10199 SW 87TH
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135AA-01200 1 S135AA-05400
ALLISON M DEAN&DOROTHY D CALDWELL TANYA L
Go ALLISON ANNETTE C 10269 SW 87TH AVE
8870 SW MAPLELEAF ST TIGARD,OR 97223
PORTLAND,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-05900 1 S 135AA-04101
ANTARES GRACE CALLAHAN JAY PATRICK
8811 SW MAPLE CT 8945 SW OAK ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-03900 7 S 135AA-05100
BAYARD MICHEL L& CASANOVA CARL
TROWT TOBY ELLEN 10233 SW 87TH
20555 BOWERY LN TIGARD,OR 97223
BEND,OR 97701
1 S 135AA-03703 1 S 135AA-03901
BRANDT WALDO G CHEPIN JOHN
8835 SW OAK ST 8911 SW OAK ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-00905 1 S 135AA-03701
BROWN JAMES F 8 CHRISTENSEN JACK L AND NANCY S
HENDERSON-BROWN CHERYL L 8805 SW OAK ST
10200 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-00902 1 S126DD-03002
B WN JAMES CRABTREE DENNIS J AND
HEN RS - ROWN CHERYL L BEVERLY J
1020 OTH AVE 10020 5W 90TH AVE
ARD,OR 23 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-06400 1 S 135AA-03702
BRYAN SUSAN J CULLINAN RANDY J AND
8770 SW MAPLE CT KRISTINA G
TIGARD,OR 97223 8775 SW OAK STREET
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135AA-04100 1S135AA-06300
BURIAK LORRAINE ANN DAGGETT KATHLEEN K
7825 SW MILLER HILL RD 1960 MAPLELEAF DR
ALOHA,OR 97007 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034
1S135AD-01302 1S126D0-03000
DAVIS EUGENE L GILE EDWARD S
10875 SW 89TH AVE 10040 SW 90TH
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
15135AB-03200 1S135AA-06900
DAVIS EUGENE L&VIVIAN GILHAM ANGELA
10875 SW 89TH ST 8840 SW MAPLE CT
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-03704 1 S 135AA-90001
DEMOUIN STEVE 8 GRABER J RICHARD
LINN MARGARET 10301 SW 87TH
10455 SW 87TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135AA-03700 1S135AA-05300
D OULIN STEV & GRAY BRANDON K 8
LINN T GRAY MELISSA
1045 AVE 7871 SW KINGFISHER WAY
T ARD,OR 97223 DURHAM,OR 97224
1 S 1�SAA-90000 1 S 128DD-03001
DE AR DOMINIUMS HALL GLADYS
OW OF UNITS Go HEINTZ SUSAN I
, 0 10415 SW 72ND
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135AB-00204 1S735AA-00906
DICKSON DONALD KEITH HARRIS BRYAN J 8 GENNIE S
PO BOX 219028 10230 SW 90TH AVE
PORTLAND,OR 97225 TIGARD,OR 97223
15135AA-01000 1 S135AA-�J0009
FINEVIEW FARM LLC HAWLEY HAZEL M
1430 EASTSIDE RD 9055 SW 91ST AVE#7
HOOD RIVER,OR 97031 PORTLAND,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-05500 1 135AA-90002
FISH LAURI HA Y L M
10277 SW 87TH AVE 9055 T AVE#7
TIGARD,OR 97223 P TLAND,O 97223
1S135AA-90010 1S135AA-00307
FLETCHER MARY K HAYZLETT MAXINE TR
10319 SW 87TH AVE 17015 SW ELDORADO DR
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224
1 S135AA-01907 1 S135AA-03902
GERIG WAYNE L&CANDICE M HAZARD SANDRA
15430 SW BOBWHITE CIR 8914 SW OAKWAY
BEAVERTON,OR 97007 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 7 35AA-00802 1 S135AA-90004
HERBERHOLZ LARRY S KLUDAS JEAN C
8870 SW LOCUST 10307 SW 87TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135AA-00803 1S135AA-01101
HERBERHOLZ LARRY S 8 CATHY D KUHN EUGENE P PAMELA L
8870 SW LOCUST 10340 SW 90TH
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135AA-03707 15135AA-00804
HITCH DORIS LAI KHOAN VAN&
10387 SW 87TH AVE LE THU THI
TIGARD,OR 97223 10161 SW JEFFERSON AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135AA-90008 1S135AA-90005
HOLLAND JEFFREY L& LAIRD SHAWN W&LOUISE M
DAWN F 10309 SW 87TH AVENUE
10315 SW 87TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135AA-01400 1 S135AA-03800
INTEGUMEND LLC LASHAWAY JULIE A
BY SCOTT COLLINS MD& Go FINCK DALE M&IDA LIFE ESTATE
MARIA ROSS MD 8875 SW OAK
9495 SW LOCUST ST TIGARD,OR 97223
PORTLAND,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-05800 1 S 135AA-06800
JIA WENYI LEVITSKY STAN A&
8795 SW MAPLE CT LEVITSKY ALEXANDRIA
TIGARD,OR 97223 8830 SW MAPLE CT
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 7 35AA-06800 1 S 135AA-02500
JOHNSON AARON J LYON DONALD J HAZEL J
8810 SW MAPLE CT 10440 SW 87TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-06000 1 S 135AA-01102
KABALIN KATHY J MACLAREN ROBERT P&
8710 SW MAPLE CT JABLONSKI MILLIE
TIGARD,OR 97223 10360 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135AB-03201 1 S135AA-05600
KILGORE KIM&PAULA MATHEWS SEAN
10445 SW 90TH AVE 8753 SW MAPLE CT
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-01002 7 S 126DC-05400
KINDRICK CHARLES C AND • METZGER UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
DEBRA A 9055 SW LOCUST
10320 SW 90TH PORTLAND,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
7S135AA-06500 1S135AC-04d00
MILLER PAIGE ORLAND L
8800 SW MAPLE CT BY ON R BARNES
TIGARD,OR 97223 22 W C UMBIA ST#1625
RTLAND,OR 97201
1S135AA-00806 1S135AA-00901
MILLS MICHAEL E AND PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS INC
BEVERLY A 1430 EASTSIDE RD
10211 SW JEFFERSON HOOD RIVER,OR 97031
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135AA-00800 1S135AA-01100
NASH GORDON O AND PENNY J PATERSON BRIAN S&SAMI 8
10231 SW JEFFERSON 10370 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-90007 15135AA-06100
NICKOLICH NAOMI R PAZEOTOPOUL05 IIZA M
10313 SW 87TH AVE 8720 SW MAPLE CT
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-01900 1 S 135A8-00202
NYS STEVEN E 8 JANINE L PENSE JAMES M AND ROXANNE M
10250 SW 87TH AVE 9140 SW LOCUST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-00700 1 S 126DD-03800
OCF JOSEPH E WESTON PILGER DENNIS F&ZOE A
PUBLIC FOUNDATION 17703 SW TREETOP WAY
BY WESTON INVESTMENT CO LLC LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97D34
2154 NE BROADWAY STE 200
PORTLAND,OR 97232
1S135AD-01301 1S135AB-03202
OREGON STAT OF DEPT OF VETS G1 PRINCE KEITH D&KRISTIN L
Go FOREIGN MISSION FOUNDATION 10455 5W 90TH AVE
10875 SW 89TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135AC-04300 1S135AA-03705
ORLAND LTD ROMERO MERCEDES G AND
BY KENTON R BARNES � MOL�NA MARTHA A
222 SW COLUMBIA ST#1625 10385 SW 87TH AVE
PORTLAND,OR 97201 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135AG04200 1S135AA-00401
ORLAND LT ROWE SHIRLEY I
BY T R BARNES WOOD JUDY
222 MBIA ST#1625 1027 SW GROVER
P TLAND,OR 97201 PORTLAND,OR 97201
1 S 135AD-01303 1 S 135AA-06700
O D LTD SANTEE JOHN R&
BY KEN BARNES JUDY A
222 COL BIA ST#1625 8820 SW MAPLE CT
RTLAND,OR 97201 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 126DG05504 1 S 135AA-90006
SCHARBROUGH DONALD AND TAYLOR J EDWARD AND
JOYCE I NEWSOME-TAYLOR PHYLLIS M
10050 SW 92ND PO BOX 230152 -
PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97281
1 S135AA-04900 1 S135AA-0Olg1
SCOTT WALTER STEVE&TRACY TI RD 7Y OF
10211 SW 87TH AVE 1312 W HALL
TIGARD,OR 97223 TI ARD, 97223
1 S 135AB-03203 1 S 126DC-05503
SHELDON MELINDA L& VANDERYACHT MARK S&
DUANE C MARY E
10425 SW 90TH AVE 9125 SW LOCUST ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-90003 1 S 135AA-00805
SHERWOOD SYDNEY L VO VIEN T&
10305 SW 87TH NGUYEN CAM VAN
TIGARD,OR 97223 10181 SW JEFFERSON ST
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-00903 1 S 135AB-00100
SICKLER LEE J WASHINGTON CLACKAMAS CO
10024 SW 55TH AVE SCHOOL DIST 23J
PORTLAND,OR 97219 13137 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-04000 1 S 135AA-00400
SMITH ROGER W WEGELE MICHAEL
JACQUELYN M 8705 SW LOCUST ST
8935 SW OAK ST TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135AA-02000 1 S7 35AA-00302
STAATS SANDRA LYNN WEGELE MICHAEL&
BY EPIC HOLDINGS LLC REGINE
PO BOX 20007 10015 SW HALL BLVD
KEIZER,OR 973D7 PMB 202
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AB-03205 1 S 135AA-00900
STANTON KAREN WEINEL BRETT M
10435 SW 90TH AVE 8950 SW LOCUST ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-00305 1 S 126DD-03100
STARDIG REBECCA L ET AL WESTON INVESTMENT CO
cJo SNEED PHIL&JOYCE 2154 NE BROADWAY
10115 SW HALL BLVD PORTLAND,OR 97232
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135AA-04200 1 S 135AA-00904
SUMMIT DORSEY WAYNE WILLIAMS LIVING TRUST
PO BOX 230998 BY DONNEL N WILLIAMS&
TIGARD,OR 97281 STEPHANIE S WILLIAMS TRS
13865 SW FERN
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135AA-06200
WINBERG HELEN D
8730 SW MAPLE CT
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135AA-07000
WINDWOOD CONSTRUCTION INC
12655 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S t AA-07200
WIND OD CO RUCTION INC
12655 5 TH DAKOTA ST
T D,OR 97223
1S135AA-04700
WIN OOD STRUCTION INC
12655 RTH DAKOTA ST
T RD,OR 9 223
1 S135AA-07100
WIN OD TRUCTION INC
12655 RTH DAKOTA ST
T RD,OR 223
�s��,aA-o�ooi
WOLF MARTIN J 8 GINA K
2550 SW OAKWOOD CT
ALOHA,OR 97006
1 S 135AA-04600
YATES RONALD W
10155 SW 87TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-05200
ZIMMERMAN DIANA L
10247 SW 87TH AVE
PORTLAND,OR 97223
, . ,
Jack Biethan
11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4
Tigard, OR 97224
Sue Rorman
11250 SW 82�d Avenue
Tigard, OR 97223
Naomi Gallucci
11285 SW 78�Avenue
Tigard, OR 97223
Michael Trigoboff
7072 SW Barbara Lane
Tigard, OR 97223
Dieter Jacobs
7775 SW Spruce Street
Tigard, OR 97223
Alexander Craghead
12205 SW Hall Boulevard �
Tigard, OR 97223-6210
David Chapman
9840 SW Landau Place
Tigard, OR 97223
Nathan and Ann Murdock
PO Box 231265
Tigard, OR 97281
Brad Spring
7555 SW Spruce Street
Tigard, OR 97223
CITY OF TIGARD - EAST fIT SUBCOMMITTEE �i:lcurpinlsetupllabelslClT East.doc) UPDATED: April 18,2002
. y
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILIHG CITYOFTIOARD
�ommunity�DeveCopment
S(+apingA BettesCommunity
I, �Patricia L. Lu�ord, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a SeniorAcfministrativeSpeciaCutfor
the C`ity of 7':gar , 'Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following:
{Check appropnate Box(s)Below}
� NOTICE OF PENDIN6 LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: MLP2003-00012/FINEVIEW fARM LL( PARTITION
❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference)
� City of Tigard Planning Director
A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked EXhlblt"A",and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to
each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked El(hlbit'B",and by reference made a part
hereof, on A11911S[11,2003,and deposited in the United States Mail on August 11,2003, postage prepaid.
(Person ha repared Notic �
,S7,�l�E O�F O�EGON )
County of'INasT ington )ss.
�'itjr of 2igard )
Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the ��day of / , �`� ``��� , 2003.
OFFICIAL SEAL __-����/J��, �
"� , 'P J BENOTSON � G � �
;7 NOTARY PUBUC-OREGON
1� COMMISSION NO.368086 �
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APR.27,2007 My Commission Expires:
� • EXHIBIT�._
NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER:
THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER.
NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION CITYOFTIf3ARD
MINOR LAND PARTITION ��°"`mun'`y��e�p"�en`
ShapingA BetterCommunity
DATE OF NOTICE: August 11, 2003
Fi�E NunnsER: MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2003-00012
FILE NAME: FINEVIEW FARM LLC PARTITION
PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval to perform a two-lot partition on a parcel of land
containing approximately 52,272 square feet. This partition will create Parcel #1 with
approximately 10,094 square feet, and Parcel #2 with approximately 8,933 square feet.
ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to
accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at
a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are
permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally.
APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390,
18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
LOCATION: No site address; WCTM 1 S135AA, Tax Lot 1000.
YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS:
Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to
submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT
5:00 PM ON AUGUST 25. 2003. All comments should be directed to Mathew Scheideqqer, Associate Planner in
the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the
City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171 or by e-mail to matts ci.ti ard.or.us.
ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED
ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS.
THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS
WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE
IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR SEPTEMBER 9, 2003. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE
SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED.
WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL
CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
. Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria
believed to be applicable to this proposal;
. Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to
provide a response;
. Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant
approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue.
Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude
subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings
directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence.
AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE
DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN
500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE
ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED
UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH
CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION.
SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS:
. The application is accepted by the City
. Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a
14-day written comment period.
. The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies.
. City Staff issues a written decision.
. Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all
owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax
assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any
governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the
City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice.
INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW:
The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are
contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development
Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this
service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of
this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments."
�
j e<o.....,�..............
,
na�r nap
coau � i —_______
ST —
��I MLP�003-00012
� � FINEVIEW FARM LLC
- PARTITION
sr ——� > I
�'� a�
� o
I I _ °
!-" J
L_� �__ m
,�� W
� P EAF Q��'\...,,\�\�`� a
�,:: .
i
�,
s-
v �� --y
�__ T':
: ,
x =
00 J � ..��°o . •
� � J �
= M�N�e • �.
ST �
N
�� PINE ST � � ��
� Ciry of Tiprd '
r�.rw��uw.w�w �
o..+s�..�...�ar.
�_ __ F�1�a�
iwr.�+.,.
1S135AB-00203 ,5,35�-0S�oo EXHIBIT ,U
ADDERLY DAVID L 8 SHARON A BUTORI EUGENE F TRUST 8
9120 SW LOCUST ST BUTORI VIRGINIA A TRUST �
TIGARD,OR 97223 BY BUTORI EUGENE FNIRGINIAATRS
7645 SW CEDAR
PORTLAND,OR 97225
1 S 135AA-05000 1 S 135AA-04800
ALBERTSON RICHARD D CAGE JUDITH K
10255 SW 87TH 10199 SW 87TH
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 7 35AA-01200 15135AA-05400
ALLISON M DEAN&DOROTHY D CALDWELL TANYA L
Go ALLISON ANNETTE C 10269 SW 87TH AVE
8870 SW MAPLELEAF ST TIGARD,OR 97223
PORTLAND,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-05900 1 S135AA-04101
ANTARES GRACE CALLAHAN JAY PATRICK
8811 SW MAPLE CT 8945 SW OAK ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-03900 1 S 135AA-05100
BAYARD MICHEL L& CASANOVA CARL
TROWT TOBY ELLEN 10233 SW 87TH
20555 BOWERY LN TIGARD,OR 97223
BEND,OR 97701
1 S 135AA-03703 1 S 135AA-03901
BRANDT WALDO G CHEPIN JOHN
8835 SW OAK ST 8911 SW OAK ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135AA-00905 1 S 135AA-03701
BROWN JAMES F& CHRISTENSEN JACK L AND NANCY S
HENDERSON-BROWN CHERYL L 8805 SW OAK ST
10200 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135AA-00902 15126DD-03002
B WN JAMES CRABTREE DENNIS J AND
HEN RS - ROWN CHERYL L BEVERLY J
1020 TH AVE 10020 SW 90TH AVE
ARO,OR 23 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135AA-06400 1S135AA-03702
BRYAN SUSAN J CULLINAN RANDY J AND
877U SW MAPLE CT KRISTINA G
TIGARD,OR 97223 8775 SW OAK STREET
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-04100 1 S 135AA-06300
BURIAK LORRAINE ANN DAGGETT KATHLEEN K
7825 SW MILLER HILL RD 1960 MAPLELEAF DR
ALOHA,OR 97007 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034
1 S 735AD-01302 1 S 7 26DD-03000
DAVIS EUGENE L GILE EDWARD S
10875 SW 89TH AVE 10040 SW 90TH
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
iS135A8-03200 1S135AA-06900
DAVIS EUGENE L&VIVIAN GILHAM ANGELA
10875 SW 89TH ST 8840 SW MAPLE CT
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135AA-03704 1 S135AA-90001
DEMOUIN STEVE& GRABER J RICHARD
LINN MARGARET 10301 SW 87TH
10455 5W 87TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-03700 1 S 135AA-05300
D OUL�N STEV & GRAY BRANDON K&
LINN T GRAY MELISSA
1045 AVE 7871 SW KINGFISHER WAY
T ARD,OR 97223 DURHAM,OR 97224
1S7 AA-90000 1S126DD-03001
DE AR DOMINIUMS HALL GLADYS
O OF UNITS cJo HEINTZ SUSAN I
, 0 10415 SW 72ND
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 7 35AB-00204 1 S135AA-00906
DICKSON DONALD KEITH HARRIS BRYAN J 8 GENNIE S
PO BOX 219028 10230 SW 90TH AVE
PORTLAND,OR 97225 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135AA-01000 7 S7 35AA-90009
FINEVIEW FARM LLC HAWLEY HAZEL M
1430 EASTSIDE RD 9055 5W 91ST AVE#7
HOOD RIVER,OR 97031 PORTLAND,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-05500 1 135AA-90002
FISH LAURI HA EY L M
10277 SW 87TH AVE 9055 ST AVE#7
TIGARD,OR 97223 P TLAND,O 97223
1S135AA-90010 1S135AA-00301
FLETCHER MARY K HAYZLETT MAXINE TR
10319 SW 87TH AVE 17015 SW ELDORADO DR
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224
1 S 7 35AA-07 901 1 S 135AA-03902
GERIG WAYNE L 8�CANDICE M HAZARD SANDRA
15430 SW BOBWHITE CIR 8914 SW OAKWAY
BEAVERTON,OR 97007 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135AA-00802 1 S135AA-90004
HERBERHOLZ LARRY S KLUDAS JEAN C
8870 SW LOCUST 10307 SW 87TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S735AA-00803 1S135AA-01101
HERBERHOLZ LARRY S&CATHY D KUHN EUGENE P PAMELA L
8870 SW LOCUST 10340 SW 90TH
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135AA-03707 1 S135AA-00804
HITCH DORIS LAI KHOAN VAN&
10387 SW 87TH AVE LE THU THI
TIGARD,OR 97223 10161 SW JEFFERSON AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-90008 7 S 7 35AA-90005
HOLLAND JEFFREY L& LAIRD SHAWN W 8 LOUISE M
DAWN F 10309 SW 87TH AVENUE
10315 SW 87TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 St 35AA-01400 1 S135AA-03800
INTEGUMEND LLC LASHAWAY JULIE A
BY SCOTT COLLINS MD& Go FINCK DALE M 8 IDA LIFE ESTATE
MARIA ROSS MD 8875 SW OAK
9495 SW LOCUST ST TIGARD,OR 97223
PORTLAND,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-05800 1 S 135AA-06800
JIA WENYI LEVITSKY STAN A&
8795 SW MAPLE CT LEVITSKY ALEXANDRIA
TIGARD,OR 97223 8830 SW MAPLE CT
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-06600 1 S 135AA-02500
JOHNSON AARON J LYON DONALD J NAZEL J
8810 SW MAPLE CT 10440 SW 87TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-06000 1 S 7 35AA-01102
KABALIN KATHY J MACLAREN ROBERT P&
8710 SW MAPLE CT JABLONSKI MILLIE
TIGARD,OR 97223 10360 5W 90TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S t 35A6-03201 1 S 7 35AA-05fi00
KILGORE KIM&PAULA MATHEWS SEAN
10445 SW 90TH AVE 8753 SW MAPLE CT
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-01002 1 S 126DC-05400
KINDRICK CHARLES C AND METZGER UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
DEBRA A 9055 SW LOCUST
10320 SW 90TH PORTLAND,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
7 S 135AA-06500 7 S 7 35AC-04400
MILLER PAIGE ORLAND L
8800 SW MAPLE CT BY ON R BARNES
TIGARD,OR 97223 22 W C UMBIA ST#1625
RTLAND,OR 97201
1 S 135AA-00806 1 S 135AA-00901
MILLS MICHAEL E AND PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS INC
BEVERLY A 1430 EASTSIDE RD
10211 SW JEFFERSON HOOD RIVER,OR 97031
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-00800 1 S 135AA-01100
NASH GORDON O AND PENNY J PATERSON BRIAN S&SAMI B
10231 SW JEFFERSON 10370 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135AA-90007 1 S135AA-06100
NICKOLICH NAOMI R PAZEOTOPOULOS LIZA M
10313 SW 87TH AVE 8720 SW MAPLE CT
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-01900 1 S 135A8-00202
NYS STEVEN E&JANINE L PENSE JAMES M AND ROXANNE M
10250 SW 87TH AVE 9140 SW LOCUST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-00700 1 S 126DD-03800
OCF JOSEPH E WESTON PILGER DENNIS F&ZOE A
PUBLIC FOUNDATION 17703 SW TREETOP WAY
BY WESTON INVESTMENT CO LLC LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034
2154 NE BROADWAY STE 200
PORTLAND,OR 97232
1S135AD-01301 1S135A6-03202
OREGON STAT OF DEPT OF VETS C-1 PRINCE KEITH D&KRISTIN L
Go FOREIGN MISSION FOUNDATION 10455 SW 90TH AVE
10875 SW 89TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AC-04300 1 S 135AA-03705
ORLAND LTD ROMERO MERCEDES G AND
BY KENTON R BARNES � MOLINA MARTHA A
222 SW COLUMBIA ST#1625 10385 5W 87TH AVE
PORTLAND,OR 97201 TIGARD.OR 97223
1 S 135AC-04200 1 S 135AA-00401
ORLAND LT ROWE SHIRLEY I
BY T R BARNES WOOD JUDY
222 MBIA ST#1625 1027 SW GROVER
P TLAND,OR 97201 PORTLAND,OR 97201
1 S 135AD-01303 1 S 135AA-06700
O D LTD SANTEE JOHN R&
BY KEN BARNES JUDY A
222 COL BIA ST#1625 8820 SW MAPLE CT
RTLAND,OR 97201 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S t 26DC-05504 1 S 135AA-90006
SCHARBROUGH DONALD AND TAYLOR J EDWARD AND
JOYCE I NEWSOME-TAYLOR PHYLLIS M
10050 SW 92ND PO BOX 230152 .
PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97281
1 S 135AA-04900 1 S 135AA-007f�1
SCOTT WALTER STEVE&TRACY TI D Y OF
10211 SW 87TH AVE 1312 W HALL
TIGARD,OR 97223 TI ARD, 97223
1 S 135AB-03203 1 S 126DC-05503
SHELDON MELINDA L& VANDERYACHT MARK S 8
DUANE C MARY E
10425 SW 90TH AVE 9125 SW LOCUST ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
7 S135AA-90003 7 S135AA-00805
SHERWOOD SYDNEY L VO VIEN T&
10305 SW 87TH NGUYEN CAM VAN
TIGARD,OR 97223 10181 SW JEFFERSON ST
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-00903 1 S 135AB-00100
SICKLER LEE J WASHINGTON CLACKAMAS CO
10024 SW 55TH AVE SCHOOL DIST 23J
PORTLAND,OR 97219 13137 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY
TIGARD,OR 97223
15135AAA4000 1 S 135AA-00400
SMITH ROGER W WEGELE M►CHAEL
JACQUELYN M 8705 SW LOCUST ST
8935 SW OAK ST TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
t S 135AA-02000 1 S 135AA-00302
STAATS SANDRA LYNN WEGELE MICHAEL 8
BY EPIC HOLDINGS LLC REGINE
PO BOX 20007 10015 5W HALL BLVD
KEIZER,OR 97307 PMB 202
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135A6-03205 1 S t 35AA-00900
STANTON KAREN WEINEL BRETT M
10435 SW 90TH AVE 8950 SW LOCUST ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-00305 1 S126DD-03100
STARDIG REBECCA L ET AL WESTON INVESTMENT CO
do SNEED PHIL&JOYCE 2154 NE BROADWAY
10115 SW HALL BLVD PORTLAND,OR 97232
TIGARD,OR 97223
�S��a,n-0azoo i S t�nv,-oosoa
SUMMIT DORSEY WAYNE WILLIAMS LIVING TRUST
PO BOX 230998 BY DONNEL N WILLIAMS&
TIGARD,OR 97281 STEPHANIE S WILLIAMS TRS
13865 SW FERN
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135AA-O6200
WINBERG HELEN D
8730 SW MAPLE CT
TIGARD,OR 97223
7 S135AA-07000
WINDWOOD CONSTRUCTION INC
12655 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST
TIGARD,OR 97223
t S 5AA-07200
WIND OD CO RUCTION INC
12655 S H DAKOTA ST
T D,OR 97223
1 S135AA-04700
WIN OOD STRUCTION INC
12655 RTH DAKOTA ST
T RD,OR 9 223
tS135AA-07100
WIN D TRUCTION INC
12655 RTH DAKOTA ST
T RD,OR 223
1 S 135AA-01001
WOLF MARTIN J&GINA K
2550 SW OAKWOOD CT
ALOHA,OR 97006
1 S135AA-04600
YATES RONALD W
10155 SW 87TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-05200
ZIMMERMAN DIANA L
10247 SW 87TH AVE
PORTLAND,OR 97223
FINEVIEW FARM LLC
ATTN: DAN BOYDEN
1430 EASTSIDE ROAD
HooD RIVER, OR 97031
ED MURPHY & ASSOCIATES
9875 SW MuRDOCK STREET
TIGARD, OR 97224
Jack Biethan
11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4
Tigard, OR 97224
Sue Rorman
11250 SW 82�d Avenue
Tigard, OR 97223
Naomi Gallucci
11285 SW 78th Avenue
Tigard, OR 97223
Michael Trigoboff
7072 SW Barbara Lane
Tigard, OR 97223
Dieter Jacobs
7775 SW Spruce Street
Tigard, OR 97223
Alexander Craghead
12205 SW Hall Boulevard
Tigard, OR 97223-6210
David Chapman
9840 SW Landau Place
Tigard, OR 97223
Nathan and Ann Murdock
PO Box 231265
Tigard, OR 97281
Brad Spring
7555 SW Spruce Street
Tigard, OR 97223
CITY OF TIGARD - EAST CIT SUBfOMMITTEE �i:lcurpinlsetupllabelslClT East.doc) UPDATED: April 18, 2002
C
C • ' �
C
� GEOGF�PHIC IHfORM�iION SYSiEM
�
o AREA NOTIFIED
,„,�„ � (500')
0
0
saww�n o
scrww o
■a�wan
0
cus-r sT FOR: Ed Murphy
� "�.'
,� �
"�.," ,,,�„ o
.,.M.,.� RE: 1 S 13 5AA, 1000
,�.», ,�. o =__________
� �
� �
�- m
.�, �„
MAPLELEAF ST �� Q
� >*�^ „�..,..
Q Property owner Information
•�*�+ is valid for 3 months from
� ,,,,,,,,,� the date printed on this map.
�.�
i
su.�r,r: '90"°" wm��n.w
_
rrwaa �-'
w�w'w� sarwM 00 J
� � Q
sr�xm� p� sa�wnr
sm�ran sn�rrr �wMaw� _
su�n
- �° ST
OA
� �
N
D 100 200 300 400 Feet
PINE ST �"=ZBO(eet
,�.«.�
.�«
City of Tigard
Infortnation on this map is for penerol location only and
should he verified with tl�e Development Senicea Divisbn.
13125 SW Hall Blvd
Tipard,OR 97223
(503)639-4177
httpJlwww.ci.tiyard.a.ua
Community Development Plot date:May 23,2003;C:lmagicWIAGIC03.APR
7 S 135AB-00203 1 S 135AA-05700
ADDERLY DAVID L 8 SHARON A BUTORI EUGENE F TRUST 8
9120 SW LOCUST ST BUTORI VIRGINIA A TRUST
TIGARD,OR 97223 BY BUTORI EUGENE FNIRGINIA A TRS
7645 SW CEDAR
PORTLAND,OR 97225
1S135AA-05000 15135AA-04800
ALBERTSON RICHARD D CAGE JUDITH K
10255 SW 87TH 10199 SW 87TH
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-01200 1 S 135AA-05400
ALLISON M DEAN&DOROTHY D CALDWELL TANYA L
Go ALLISON ANNETTE C 10269 SW 87TH AVE
8870 SW MAPLELEAF ST TIGARD,OR 97223
PORTLAND,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-05900 1 S 135AA-04101
ANTARES GRACE CALLAHAN JAY PATRICK
8811 SW MAPLE CT 8945 SW OAK ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-03900 1 S 135AA-05100
BAYARD MICHEL L& CASANOVA CARL
TROWT TOBY ELLEN 10233 SW 87TH
20555 BOWERY LN TIGARD,OR 97223
BEND,OR 97701
1 S 135AA-03703 t S 135AA-03901
BRANDT WALDO G CHEPIN JOHN
8835 SW OAK ST 8911 SW OAK ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-00905 1 S 135AA-03701
BROWN JAMES F& CHRISTENSEN JACK L AND NANCY S
HENDERSON-BROWN CHERYL L 8805 SW OAK ST
10200 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-00902 1 S 126DD-03002
B WN JAMES CRABTREE DENNIS J AND
HEN RS - ROWN CHERYL L BEVERLY J
1020 OTH AVE 10020 SW 90TH AVE
ARD,OR 23 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-06400 1 S 135AA-03702
BRYAN SUSAN J CULLINAN RANDY J AND
8770 SW MAPLE CT KRISTINA G
TIGARD,OR 97223 8775 SW OAK STREET
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-04100 1 S 135AA-06300
BURIAK LORRAINE ANN DAGGETT KATHLEEN K
7825 SW MILLER HILL RD 1960 MAPLELEAF DR
ALOHA,OR 97007 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034
1 S135AD-01302� 1 S126DD-03000
DAVIS EUGENE L GILE EDWARD S
10875 SW 89TH AVE 10040 SW 90TH
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AB-03200 7 S 135AA-06900
DAVIS EUGENE L&VIVIAN GILHAM ANGELA
10875 SW 89TH ST 8840 SW MAPLE CT
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARO,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-03704 1 S 135AA-90001
DEMOUIN STEVE& GRABER J RICHARD
LINN MARGARET 10301 SW 87TH
10455 SW 87TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-03700 1 S 135AA-05300
D OULIN STEV & GRAY BRANDON K&
LINN T GRAY MELISSA
1045 AVE 7871 SW KINGFISHER WAY
T ARD,OR 97223 DURHAM,OR 97224
1S1�5AA-90000 1S128DD-03001
DE AR DOMINIUMS HALL GLADYS
OW OF UNITS Go HEINTZ SUSAN I
, 0 10415 SW 72ND
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135A8-00204 1 S 135AA-00906
DICKSON DONALD KEITH HARRIS BRYAN J&GENNIE S
PO BOX 219028 10230 SW 90TH AVE
PORTLAND,OR 97225 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-01000 1 S 135AA-90009
FINEVIEW FARM LLC HAWLEY HAZEL M
1430 EASTSIDE RD 9055 SW 91ST AVE#7
HOOD RIVER,OR 97031 PORTLAND,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-05500 1 135AA-90002
FISH LAURI HA EY L M
10277 SW 87TH AVE 9055 T AVE#7
TIGARD,OR 97223 P TLAND,O 97223
1 S 7 35AA-90010 1 S 135AA-00301
FLETCHER MARY K HAYZLETT MAXINE TR
10319 SW 87TH AVE 17a15 SW ELDORADO DR
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224
15135AA-01901 1 S 135AA-03902
GERIG WAYNE L&CANDICE M HAZARD SANDRA
15430 SW BOBWHITE CIR 8914 SW OAKWAY
BEAVERTON,OR 97007 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-00802 1 S 135AA-90004
HERBERHOLZ LARRY S KLUDAS JEAN C
8870 SW LOCUST 10307 SW 87TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-00803 1 S 135AA-01101
HERBERHOLZ LARRY S&CATHY D KUHN EUGENE P PAMELA L
8870 SW LOCUST 10340 SW 90TH
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-03707 1 S 135AA-00804
HITCH DORIS LAI KHOAN VAN&
10387 SW 87TH AVE LE THU THI
TIGARD,OR 97223 10161 SW JEFFERSON AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 7 35AA-90008 1 S 135AA-90005
HOLLAND JEFFREY L& LAIRD SHAWN W&LOUISE M
DAWN F 10309 SW 87TH AVENUE
10315 SW 87TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-01400 1 S 135AA-03800
INTEGUMEND LLC LASHAWAY JULIE A
BY SCOTT COLLINS MD& Go FINCK DALE M&IDA LIFE ESTATE
MARIA ROSS MD 8875 SW OAK
9495 SW LOCUST ST TIGARD,OR 97223
PORTLAND,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-05800 1 S 135AA-08800
JIA WENYI LEVITSKY STAN A&
8795 SW MAPLE CT LEVITSKY ALEXANDRIA
TIGARD,OR 97223 8830 SW MAPLE CT
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135AA-06600 1S135AA-02500
JOHNSON AARON J LYON DONALD J HAZEL J
8810 SW MAPLE CT 10440 SW 87TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-06000 1 S 135AA-01102
KABALIN KATHY J MACLAREN ROBERT P&
8710 SW MAPLE CT JABLONSKI MILLIE
TIGARD,OR 97223 10360 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AB-03201 1 S 135AA-05600
KILGORE KIM 8 PAULA MATHEWS SEAN
10445 SW 90TH AVE 8753 SW MAPLE CT
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-01002 1 S 126DC-05400
KINDRICK CHARLES C AND METZGER UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
DEBRA A 9055 SW LOCUST
10320 SW 90TH PORTLAND,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-06500� 1 S 135AC-04400
MILLER PAIGE ORLAND L
8800 SW MAPLE CT BY ON R BARNES
TIGARD,OR 97223 22 W C UMBIA ST#1625
RTLAND,OR 97201
1 S 135AA-00806 1 S 135AA-00901
MILLS MICHAEL E AND PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS INC
BEVERLY A 1430 EASTSIDE RD
10211 SW JEFFERSON HOOD RIVER,OR 97031
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-00800 1 S 135AA-07100
NASH GORDON O AND PENNY J PATERSON BRIAN S&SAMI B
10231 SW JEFFERSON 10370 SW 90TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-90007 1 S 135AA-06100
NICKOLICH NAOMI R PAZEOTOPOULOS LIZA M
10313 SW 87TH AVE 8720 SW MAPLE CT
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S135AA-01900 1 S135AB-00202
NYS STEVEN E&JANINE L PENSE JAMES M AND ROXANNE M
10250 SW 87TH AVE 9140 SW LOCUST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
7 S 135AA-00700 1 S 126 DD-03800
OCF JOSEPH E WESTON PILGER DENNIS F&ZOE A
PUBLIC FOUNDATION 17703 SW TREETOP WAY
BY WESTON INVESTMENT CO LLC LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034
2154 NE BROADWAY STE 200
PORTLAND,OR 97232
7 S 135AD-01301 1 S 135AB-03202
OREGON STAT OF DEPT OF VETS G1 PRINCE KEITH D&KRISTIN L
Go FOREIGN MISSION FOUNDATION 10455 SW 90TH AVE
10875 SW 89TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AC-04300 15135AA-03705
ORLAND LTD ROMERO MERCEDES G AND
BY KENTON R BARNES MOLINA MARTHA A
222 SW COLUMBIA ST#1625 10385 SW 87TH AVE
PORTLAND,OR 97201 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AC-04200 1 S 135AA-00401
ORLAND LTD ROWE SHIRLEY I
BY T R BARNES WOOD JUDY
222 MBIA ST#1625 1027 SW GROVER
P TLAND,OR 97201 PORTLAND,OR 97201
1 S135AD-01303 1 S135AA-06700
OR D LTD SANTEE JOHN R&
BY KEN BARNES JUDY A
222 COL BIA ST#1625 8820 SW MAPLE CT
RTLAND,OR 97201 TIGARD,OR 97223
�s�zsbc-05soa i s i�a,a-s000s
SCHARBROUGH DONALD AND TAYLOR J EDWARD AND
JOYCE I NEWSOME-TAYLOR PHYLLIS M
10050 SW 92ND PO BOX 230152
PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97281
1 S 135AA-04900 1 S 135AA-007(j1
SCOTT WALTER STEVE&TRACY TI D Y OF
10211 SW 87TH AVE 1312 HALL
TIGARD,OR 97223 TI ARD, 97223
1 S 135A8-03203 1 S 126DC-05503
SHELDON MELINDA L& VANDERYACHT MARK S&
DUANE C MARY E
10425 SW 90TH AVE 9125 SW LOCUST ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S135AA-90003 1S735AA-00805
SHERWOOD SYDNEY L VO VIEN T&
10305 SW 87TH NGUYEN CAM VAN
TIGARD,OR 97223 10181 SW JEFFERSON ST
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-00903 1 S7 35A8-00100
SICKLER LEE J WASHINGTON CLACKAMAS CO
10024 SW 55TH AVE SCHOOL DIST 23J
PORTLAND,OR 97219 13137 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-04000 1 S 135AA-00400
SMITH ROGER W WEGELE MICHAEL
JACQUELYN M 8705 SW LOCUST ST
8935 SW OAK ST TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-02000 1 S 135AA-00302
STAATS SANDRA LYNN WEGELE MICHAEL&
BY EPIC HOLDINGS LLC REGINE
PO BOX 20007 10015 SW HALL BLVD
KEIZER,OR 97307 PMB 202
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AB-03205 1 S 135AA-00900
STANTON KAREN WEINEL BRETT M
10435 SW 90TH AVE 8950 SW LOCUST ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-00305 1 S126DD-03100
STARDIG REBECCA L ET AL WESTON INVESTMENT CO
cJo SNEED PHIL&JOYCE 2154 NE BROADWAY
10115 SW HALL BLVD PORTLAND,OR 97232
TIGARD,OR 97223
7 S 135AA-04200 1 S 135AA-00904
SUMMIT DORSEY WAYNE WILLIAMS LIVING TRUST
PO BOX 230998 BY DONNEL N WILLIAMS&
TIGARD,OR 97281 STEPHANIE 5 WILLIAMS TRS
13865 SW FERN
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-06200'
WINBERG HELEN D
8730 SW MAPLE CT
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-07000
WINDWOOD CONSTRUCTION INC
12655 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S l�5AA-07200
WIND OD CO RUCTION INC
12655 S H DAKOTA ST
T D,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-04700
WIN OOD STRUCTION INC
12655 RTH DAKOTA ST
T RD,OR 9 223
1 S 7 35AA-07100
WIN OD TRUCTION INC
12655 RTH DAKOTA ST
T RD,OR 223
1 S 135AA-01001
WOLF MARTIN J&GINA K
2550 SW OAKWOOD CT
ALOHA,OR 97006
1 S135AA-04600
YATES RONALD W
10155 SW 87TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223
1 S 135AA-05200
ZIMMERMAN DIANA L
10247 SW 87TH AVE
PORTLAND,OR 97223
Jack Biethan
11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4
Tigard, OR 97224
Sue Rorman
11250 SW 82�d Avenue
Tigard, OR 97223
Naomi Gallucci
11285 SW 78�Avenue
Tigard, OR 97223
Michael Trigoboff
7072 SW Barbara Lane
Tigard, OR 97223
Dieter Jacobs
7775 SW Spruce Street
Tigard, OR 97223
Alexander Craghead
12205 SW Hall Boulevard
Tigard, OR 97223-6210
David Chapman
9840 SW Landau Place
Tigard, OR 97223
Nathan and Ann Murdock
PO Box 231265
Tigard, OR 97281
Brad Spring
7555 SW Spruce Street
Tigard, OR 97223
CITY OF TIGARD - EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE �i:lcurpinlsetupllabelslClT East.doc) UPDATED: April 18, 2002
May 22 03 07: 51a Murphy 5n�9681674 p. 2
' `
C�TY OF TiGARD
COMMUNITY DEYELOPMENT DfPARTMEMT
PtANt�iNG DIYI514M
131Z5 i4V HALL BOULEYARD CRY OF71GdQp
TIGARQ, QRECION 911Z3 , Ca+Rmursity 2�evelopmnel
PHONE SOJ-639-4iTl fAll� 583-684-7297 �Attrc PallrlPhnning) Slraprr�,eB�tter�bw,n,u,;ey
� Q a � � �. Q �_ o000 o O o [� 1 �(�
U��!�'J�
Property owner informa�ion is vafid for 3 months from the date of your request
INDIEA�FE ALt PR�,�ECT NFf�P & TAX L�F�UMgERS (i,e. 1St34AB, Taxtot06'iflo)Q� THE
�4QDRESSES FO� ���. ��p.���� (',�RG�LS BE�4W:
C f S ( �� d�' o00
Luca�� �at c,� (+� oK
c
lNDICATE V#lHETt�ER �QU ARE REQUESTING 't, 2 �f�3 SETS QF L,48�LS: �-
(NOTE: A r�ittir�t�rr�of 2 sets of Eabels Wil4 be pFOVided (�Jess only holding a neighbochood meeti�g a�fhis Ei�tte)ta ptace on
your 2 sets of envelopes that applicanis a�e requic�ed to subrnit at the time of applica6on submittal. If a neighborhood
meeting is required and you have not yefiheid thatmeetirtg,yw can r�quest 3 sets pravided-your latt�vse applicatiorr wilf be
submified and deemed camplete by the Planning Division within 3 monEhs from this request.
NAME QE CONTAGT PERS�N: � �'�'� f ���� �f°��
�Y.�-� �� rHaN�
T is tec�uest maX be maile , faxed or hand deliYer�d to e CitX of T�gard. lease al ow a
2-day rnmimum f�r processing requesfs. Upon compietion of your request the contact�person wil! be
called to pick up their request ti�at will be placed in "Wifl Ca1P' by their la'st name, at t1�e Community
Development Recepfion Desk.
The eost o€ Prfleessing yofx reque�t rn�$� b�pa�d at the tir�e of p�f� ufs, as exact cost car� �ot be
pre-determined.
PLEASE NOTE: FOR REASC?NS OF ACCURACY, ONLY ORIGINAL MAILING LASELS PROVIDED
BX�'HE C�TY uS: RE-T1�P€D MAf�IN� LA$EL-S YVILL 6€ACGE��EQ.
Cost�Qesc�tinn
$���9�����e mailing-I+sE,pl�s$2 per sk�eet for pti�Ei�g the N�t onb fabels(2P addresses per sheetJ.
Then,multi 1 che cost to rint one set of labels b the number ot sets re uesfed.
E��tE COST FOR TH►S REQiIEST
4 sheets of labels x$2/sheet= 8.p0 x 2 sets= �
�_ $16.00 �sheet(s)of labels x S2/sheet=�x t�., s�s=
2 sheets of labels x$2/sheet for CIT area x 2 se1s=� 4.00 �sheet(s)oi labels x�2lsheet for,ElT area=�,�c,sets=�
GENFRATE usT =� GENEw3rE usT =
TOTA� =$31.pU _/,�� TOTAI
�/ �� �
�
�
CITY OF TIGARD �
�omtnurrrty,[Ue�z�eCoprnent
S(api�r��l�13�tterConuninrity
LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION
120 DAYS = 12/3/2003
FILE NO.: MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2003-00012
FILE TITLE: FINEVIEW FARM LLC PARTITION
APPLICANT/ Fineview Farm LLC APPLICANT'S Ed Murphy & Associates
OWNER: Attn: Dan Boyden REP.: 9875 SW Murdock Street
1430 Eastside Road Tigard, OR 97224
Hood River, OR 97031
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to perform a two-lot partition on a parcel of land
containing approximately 52,272 square feet. This partition will create Parcel #1 with
approximately 10,094 square feet, Parcel #2 with approximately 8,933 square feet with a
2,151 square foot access, and a 31,094 square foot wetland area.
LOCATION: The subject site is located east of SW 90�' Avenue, 330 feet south of SW Locust Street;
WCTM 1 S135AA, Tax Lot 1000.
ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to
accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential
units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family
units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted
conditionally.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715,
18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
CIT AREA: East
DECISION MAKING BODY BELOW: ❑ TYPE I � TYPE II ❑ TYPE III ❑ TYPE IV
DATE COMMENTS WERE SENT: AUGUST 11, 2003 DATE COMMENTS ARE DUE: AUGUST 25. 2003
❑HEARINGS OFFICER [MONJ DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 1:00 PM
❑PLANNING COMMISSION [MONJ DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 1:00 PM
❑CITY COUNCIL RUES� DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 1:30PM
� STAFF DECISION RENTATIYE] DATE OF DECISION: SEPTEMBER 9, 2003
COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION
� VICINITY MAP � CONTOUR MAP � TREE PLAN
� SITE PLAN � UTILITY PLAN � IMPACT STUDY
� NARRATIVE � PRELIMINARY PLAT � OTHER:
STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheideqqer, Associate Planner (503) 639-4171, Ext. 2437
�
PRE-APP.HELD Blh
CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISI�N �
13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD, OR 97223-8189
503.639.4171/503.684.7297
crrr oF rioaR�
OREGON LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION
File# �,�3 �,"�,i Other Case#
Date �' S�: � � B ' Recei t# :�� ' Z3 5�' Date A lication Com lete
YPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR
❑AdjustmenWariance (I or II) �Minor Land Partition (II) ❑Subdivision (II or III)
❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment(IV) ❑ Minor Modification (I) ❑Zone Change (III)
❑ Conditional Use (III) ❑ Planned Development(III) ❑Zone Change Annexation (IV)
❑ Historic Overlay(II or III) ❑Sensitive Lands Review(I, II or III) ❑Zone Ordinance Amendment (IV)
0 Home Occupation (I or II) ❑ Site Development Review (II)
❑ Miscellaneous (I)-(Lot Line AdjustmentlTemporary Use/Tree Removal/Director's Interpretation, etc.)
ress i avai a e
�c+51 S l'" o � oa �c,cu S e
C T S AA �=`jL
• Zo cccves -�(.5
,
�17��e�.J ✓v� LC.0 � 0 1 v� o
a o dod ' e✓ o 0 3�
S� 1 - 84- � sy - 38(,-
Ec� �M u� l� so3-6zy- y6t5
a is i more an one
�/le V�e�J rw,
�y � S ' e oGd v r►re,r' OR O
s� l • 8�- S � � 381�� 3?
*When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in
possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owners must sign this application in the
s ace rovided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this a lication.
ease e spea ic
r 'ov, r 0
r � �,
APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT ALL OF THE REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS AS
DESCRIBED IN THE "BASIC SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS" INFORMATION SHEET.
�
� �
THE APPLICANT SHALL CERTIFY THAT:
♦ If the application is granted,the appticant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the
terms and subjeet Eo all the sonditions and limitations o�lhe appfoval.
• AU ihe above statements and the stafements in the plot plan, attachments,and exhibits
transmitted he,r�wGith,are 4�anrt tk►e applicac�ts so ackAOwledge t#ia#a��permit iss�ed, basec�
�.: .�;;;i ci�:�ii:.aii::i�, �„ap be revokecf if it is found that any such statements are fafse.
rL,.. �«...r:r,,..� c_ � ��..
� - � -'r'r'. �^..� �aS .'cc."�. �i:� ...`.`-- :::�i::;ii:S �;;�ii:-, u�j�iiCaiivii, +�Giuuu�y uie �oiicies and criceria.
�::;; �::u:cr;;G;l�:�;:.�.eyc:ir�cu:.a::s}ur dppr�vu�g�r denyu�►g ci�e appl�catio�{s),
SiG?;�.T'�w t,r E�i.ti-4Wi�I�is a�=Te-ic Sut'3,iEG�'e't�v��K7Y ARE t��QUE�€.D.
� -
. �/rG'"`�- C�-Z�. •��
uwner�sSic�lt�, re ,�,��t�, ;��,,� , ,-�, Date
u'�rvrrer's S�grtat�re Date
ir:v^2r's zigrtatirrF vtit� �
Owner's Signature Date
Owner's Signature Date
- —— _ _I ---_ _.. _ --
Rpplieanfb4genffRepfese�ta�ive's SignaEttre Date
ApplicanflAgentlRepresentative's SignatuRe Date
�
CITY OF TIGARD
August s, 2oos OREGON
Pacific Crest Parners, Inc.
Attn: Dan Boyden
1430 Eastside Road
Hood River, OR 97031
Dear Mr. Boyden:
RE: Notice of Complete Application Submittal (MLP2003-00012)
The City has reviewed your submittal material and finds that your application is
complete as of 08/05/03. Staff will now review your application for Land Partition
Approval and associated applications. A decision will be rendered within 5-6 weeks.
I am available to answer questions and otherwise assist you as may be required at
503-639-4171, extension 2437. Office hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday
through Friday. If I am not available, please leave your name and phone number so
that I can call you as soon as possible.
Sincerely,
,�f � -.`'
athew Scheidegger
Associate Planner
i:\cu rp I n 1m a th ew\m I p2003-00012.acc.a cc
c: MLP2003-00012 Land Use File
Ed Murphy & Associates
9875 SW Murdock Street
Tigard, OR 97224
13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772
�
�
June 30, 2003
CITY OF TIGARD
Pacific Crest Parners, Inc.
OREGON
Attn: Dan Boyden
1430 Eastside Road
Hood River, OR 97031
Dear Mr. Boyden:
RE: Notice of Incomplete A�plication Submittal MLP2003-00012
The City has not received the information necessary to begin the review of your Minor
Land Partition application. Staff has, therefore, deemed your application submittal as
incomplete. In order for staff to proceed, the following materials will need to be
submitted:
. Submit 16 additional packets of submittal material.
I will need 16 copies of full size plans and narrative. This partition was reviewed in 1999
(MLP1999-00018). If no information has changed, you may request a copy of the
previously approved plans and narrative in order to make your own copies.
. Submit ownership information (copy of deed or transfer title).
I am available to answer questions and otherwise assist you as may be required at
503-639-4171, extension #2437. Office hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday
through Friday. If I am not available, please leave your name and phone number so
that I can call you as soon as possible.
Sincerely, �`
�����
Mathew Scheidegger '
Assistant Planner
i:1cu rpin\mathewUnlp2003-00�12.acc
'.
c: MLP2003-00012 Land Use File 'E
Ed Murphy & Associates
9875 SW Murdock Street
Tigard, OR 97224
13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tiga�d, OR 97223(503)639-4171 TDD(503)684-2772
� �
� ED MURPHY �t ASSOCIATES
��� l.n�i�l (�.s�� Yluiirrilicl cnirl 1)��r��(r��niir�iit Sr-r�i i����.�
July 23, 2003
Matt Scheidegger, Assistant Pianner
City of Tigard - Community Development Department
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, Oregon 97223
RE: Application for Minor Partition, "Fineview - Partition #2"
WCTM 15135AA, Tax Lot 1000.
Dear Mr. Scheidegger:
Thank you for your letter dated )une 30, 2003 requesting 16 additional packets of
submittal material, and ownership information. With this letter, I am submitting
the additional copies, including 16 full-sized sets of drawings. I am also attaching
ownership information.
As we discussed previously, this is a re-application for a partition that was approved
by the City in May of 2000. The approval expired before the final plat was
submitted. The previous file number is MLP 1999-00018. (Note that the tax lot
number has changed. What was tax lot 1301 is now tax lot 1000).
The application materials being submitted are, for the most part, copies of the 2000
application, with one addition. Clean Water Services asked for a natural resource
assessment of the current condition of the wetland buffer area. We have completed
that assessment, which is attached as an exhibit to the application, and submitted
it to Clean Water Services for review. We should be able to provide a service
provider letter from Clean Water Services soon.
Please feel free to call me if you have any questions or need additional information.
Thank-you Matt.
��v�
Sin rely,
J�.1L r.
�, ��,G.
T�r A�.
--�-"'":"''� Ed Murphy, AI P
��c�-r�.,���
cc: Dan Boyden
��hy; SW Murdvck St. I'igard, Oreqon 97sz4
/ Yhone ,503. 6z4.46z5 /Cellular 503. 3�4.06�� /Fax 503. g68.�674
Jul 03 03 11: 04p Daniel J. Boyden [5411 386-9375 p. 3 �
I• J �►�_vr. ��� �� u���;ar� ■s� v�■ ■ ■ ■ �� ■��r�r Cw o' ehi�gtort j ao
� ' I,Jerry R. Hanson,Di�ector ol Assess-
�' ment and Tanation and Ex--f3fticio County
�' �y� WARRANTY DEED This Spac Clerk for said coun(y,do hereby certify that
the within instrument ol writing was received
and recwded in book of records of said
GRAN?OR: 1EFFERY EUGEI�'� KRO� county. ``
GRANTEE: PACIFIC CREST pART!VERS, INC. r(U`�o'��
[lntii a ch�e�s requcsted, atl tax statcmcnts shatl be
Jerry R_ Hanspn, Qirector of
sent to the followin� address: Assessment and Taxation,Ex-
o OffiCio Courfy Clerk
PACIFIC CRGST PARTNERS, IT1C.
91 I OAK ST. �
Doc : 97058637
1lOOD RNER, OR 97031 Rect: 189063 188. 00
06/26/1997 03: 53:09pm �
I:scrow No. G59G46JA Title tio. W659646
�
After recording rcturn to: '
PACIFIC CRGST PARTNERS, INC. '
911 nAK ST.
NOOd RNER, OR 97031 �
STATtiTORY WARRANTY DEED
JEFFERY EUCENL KROO Grantor, conveys and warrants to PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS, ING, AN OREGON
t CORPORATION. Gra�itee, tl�e foliowing described real property free of encumbranccs cxcept as specifically set forth herein
situated m VI'ASHINGTON County, Oregon, to wit:
�
� 5EE 'LEGAL IIESCRIPTION' ATTACHED HERETO AIYD BY REFEREIYCE MADE A PART HEREOF
TH[S INSTRi1MENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF TH� PROPERTY DLSCRIBED 1N THIS 1NSTRUMENT 1Ti VIOLATiON
OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS ANb REGULA'T'tONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMETVT,
"I'FIE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE'i'ITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOUI,D CFIECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE C1TY OR
COIJNTY ALAhMING DEPARTMETfT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LJMiTS ON
LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR POREST PRACTICES AS DEF1tiED iN ORS 30.930. The said prope[ry is free from
encumbrances except: THE STAT'UT�RY POWERS OF THE UNfP1ED SEWCRAGE AGENCY; EASEMENTS FOR
UTILITIES, 1F ANY.
The true cor.sideratio:i for this conveyance is S]50,000.0(1 (Here comaly �vith the require�en[s of Oi\5 9.i.030)
Dated this _(�day of��(,[� 19�
�/ ��
JE EU ..NE KRO
1/�
te of Oreggo�, County of � __ �a _
re
The foregoin��instrument was acknowledged before me this��y of �.� ____, 19�� by
IEFf ERY EUG
i ' ( �_ �' s
4
ta�� Publi�or Oregon �� +`�`" � 0� WASHINGTON C011N�V
�on e�pires: ID-I S'� ,J 1 `+`_ � RE'QL Aqpp�RN �jpANSfER TA
J t ��jQ, QO (v• Zlo•��
� �q � n:.� FEE PAID QpTE
GOMAAIY9B10N NO.OG7�
, NK C9M�11�D�PM��f.1�.�
������
Jul 03 03 11: 04p Daniel J. Boyden (5411 386-9375 p. 4
J T�co� TITLE INS��'�� �R TIT�E tNSURA�''R�_
EXllIB1T 'A'
I.ECAL DGSCRIPTION
The South 7� feec of Lots 7, 8, 9, 10, Block 4, TOW:�I OF M6TZGGR, in the City of Tigard,.Coanty
of Washington and State of Oreaaf, TOGETHER WI7-H the vacated }wrEions c��Madison St. and
S.W. Mapleleaf St., adjacent thereto and more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the SoutHeast corner of Lot 1Q Block 4, TOWN OF METZGER, iri the CfEp of Tigard,
County of Washineton and State of Ore�on; thence Nortl� along the East line of said Lot 10, 75 feet;
d�ence East parallel with t}�e Soud� kine of said Lot 10, a distance of 25 feet to the center line of
Madison St., (vacated); tlten Soutti along the said center line l00 feet to the point of intersection �vith
the center of Southwest Maple St (vacated); tl�ence �Vest along said cet�ter {itte 225 feei lo the East
line of SouN�west 90th Ave; tl�ence Nortli along said East line, 25 feet to the Southwest corner of Lot
7, Btock �, TOWN OF METZGER;thence East 200 feei along the South line of B)cek 4, Eo the true
point of beginninb.
Jul 03 03 11 : 04p Daniel J. Boyden f5411 386-9375 p. l
� ■ ��..W�� � f� V` �\\�V��rl��\
1uARRANTY Di:En ;hi STATE OF OREGON �
� County of Washington SS
GR.AN7'OR� JUDY C. �VOOD
II,Jerry R.Hansan,Director of Assess-
mertt and Taxation and Ex-Officio County
GRr\T3TEE: FINEVIL�'l' rAR�1 LLC � Clerk fo.said county,do hereby certiiy that
Ithe wilhin instrument oi writing was received
Unti] a change is requested,all tax seatements shal{be and recorcied in book of records of said
county. �
sent to the folleiving address:
FINEVIEW FAIL'vl LLC
1430 �ASTSIDE ROAD
1-IOOD RIVER, OR 97031 Jerry R. Hanson, Director ot
Assessment and Taxation,Ex-
Escrou• No. G9>jGS TiUc I�'o. G9�56S-�:V1 i Officio County Clerk
Attcr rccording returu to: DoC : 20t)U003�19
1=1NE�'IEW FARM LLC Rect: 297290 77.00
1430 EASTSIDE ROAD O1/19/20U0 10:33:04am
!-IOOD R1VL'•I2, OR 97031
yQ - �
�� � STATLT'TORY WARRAi`TY UEED
�l Ji.JDY C_ WOOD Grantnr, con��eys and�+�arrauts to PIAIEYIEW rARM, L.L.C.,ao Orcgon limited liability company Grantee,
the following dcscribed real property free of encumbrances cxcept as specitically set fortli l�erein situated in \�I�ASf1Il`iGTO�I
Coun[�•, Oregon, [o�vit
w SE�'LEGAL DESCRIP'tION' A'1'TACHED{IGREZ'O AND BY REFERET{CE MADE A PAR'T fiEREOS.
....8
� THIS II�STRli�IE\T WILL hOT ALL01ti- I;SE OF T1IE i'ROPERTY DESCRLBED [N"TFIIS [;�STRtiMENT Il� I�tOLATIOti
�"" OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND R�GULATIONS. [�GFORE SIGNIPIG OR ACCEPT�G THIS INSTRUMENT,
('� THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE "177LE TO THE PROPERTY S}IOULD CHFiCK WIrH THE APPROPRIAT� CITY OR
O COtI�TY PLAI�ITJ1\G DF,P:'�RTMG�'f T�VERIFY APPROYED USES AND TO DETERiv1INL- ANY LIMITS ON
V LAVVSUITS AGA17`rST FARMING OR FQRLS'f PRACT[CCS �1S DEFINED fN ORS 30.930. "rhe sa�d p�operty is frce from
}r encumbrancesexcepc:CONDITIONS. RCSTRICTIONS, GASEMENTS AVD POWERS OF SPLCIAL DISTRICTS, If ANY.
m I'he true cuns�derat�on for this conveyance is$50,000.00 (Hcre comply��ith tt�c requirements of ORS 93.030)
�
� Dated this �day of �_�`%�Ci %
� �/ ' � / __— —
�. J Y C. „
�
,J '
Stare of Oregon, County of ��� /it/��'� /'
�a�—�,
Z'he foregoing instrument was ackno�vledge.�lbefore me this__� day of,_ . 20G)� by
JUDY C. WUUD �
% �� ,
� ; -
� . `�"'� '� =<� Uf FIC{AL SF/�L
of Public for Oret�on �SF�� 6ARSAqA MASK1IVS
� u.
t M commission ez ires: � 'P�� NUTqRY PUBUC-OREGON
y y r �`: r.��;F„rissto�;P�D.322fi44
�l MY COh}NHSStf7PJ FXPIi�ES/IPR.18,2003
v
c
�.�- .
.•.
C:r...,.{�,:-,CN �..,..;:i Y
-.. -" T.�a t':�.`�:' }ia.l'
- �:�.J`YO•G1D � �al-OD
:;-� - -
__ _ - 6=::� ��I� DA7E
Jul 03 03 11 : 04p Daniel J. Boyden (5411 386-9375 p. 2
�31Ct�R TITIE INSURANC�
EXI[IBIT 'A'
LEGA1. U�SCIi[PTIpN
PARCF,L 1: A parcel of kand in Northeast one quarter of tlte Northeast one-quarter of SeeEion 3�,
To�vnship 1 South, Range 1 West oi the ��'illamette Meridian, in ihe City of Tipard, County of
�Vashin�ton and State of Oregvn, tawit:
Lots I, 2, and the I�iorih 40 feet of Lot 12, Block t9, 704Wi OF MET7._L'R, together �vith Lots 1, 2
and 3, Block 20, TQWN OF METfGER,to�ether �e�ith that portion of Maple Street East eontiguous
to sa�d Lots 2 and 3, Block 20 ���hich inured to these l�ts as a result of thc vacation in Resolution and
Order recorded in Book 941 page 686, Washm��tort Couaty Records, together «�ith that portion of
Madison Street conti�uous to said Lot 1 and the horth 40 feet of Lot ]2. Block 19 and Lot 3, Block
20 �vhich inured to these lots as a resu}t of the vacation recorded in Book 311 page 53�, Washington
County Records. together with the South one-half of�hat portion of vacated N7aple Street West W�hich
lies between the Westerly right oF���ay lir.e uf the a5andc�ned Orego:� Etectric Rai}road and the
�asterly right of�vay line of SW Monroe Street (SW 90th Avcmic).
PARCbL 2: Lot 9, Block 2], TOWN OF MET7GER, in the City of"!'igard; County af 1�ashinglon
and State of Oregon.
TOGETHER W1TH that portion of vacated SE'V Maple Street whiclt inured theretc�hy reason of
Vacation in Resolulion and Order 72-240, recorded in Book 94] page 68G, Washington County
Ree�rds.
AWD TOGETHER W1TH that portion of vaeated S W Madison Street whrch inured thereto by reason
of��acation recorded in Book 311 page 535, �'�'ashington County Deed Rccords.
Jul 03 03 11: 04p Daniel J. Boyden (5411 386-9375 p. 5
_ STATE G.�IREGOIY �
County of Washingto� SS
AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO' �,Jerry R. Hansan,Director of Assess-
� • ment and Taxation and Ex-OfFicio County
Clerk for said county,do hereby certrfy that
ihe within instrument of writing was received
P3C1f1C Crest Partners, I1lC. and recorded in book of reCOrds o1 said
C/Q FINEVIEW FAIL�1 LLC county. I�
1430 Eastside Road
Hood River, OR 17031
Jerry R. Hanson, Director of
Assessment and Taxation,Ex-
Officio County Clerk
Doc : 2UODU03721
Rect: 247290 27.00
O1/19/200U 1U:33:U�lam
,L-7 AME23DMENT TQ EASEMEI3T
A. Peter A. Savage and An:. Savaqe (r,erein "Savage") are
''i'� owners of certair. property at 10300 SW 90"', Tigard, Oregon, more
particularly described as the r.ortherly 70 feet of Lots 3 and 4,
'•.�' Block 19, TO�dtv OF METZGER, vlashingtcn County, Oregor.. The
southerly 7 '� feet of the property of 5avage is subject to an
easemer.t for purposes of instailation and maintaining a sewer line
which was recorded on April 27, 1982 , Document Hur�ber 82010466 ,
Washingtnn County Records.
�i B. Pursuant to a Settlement Agreer�.ezt executed among
a� •� Savage, Judy C. Wood, �'rancis W. Chapnan and Pacific Crest
� F Partners, Inc. , Savage agreed upon certain conditions to expand the
�; �j easement. Those conditions have Ioeen satisfied. Fineview Farm,
��; � LLC, will acquire the property to the north and west and is the
�� successor in interest to the easement rights_
C; y.
;+= ;) NOw, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed that the easement
;:: � described above i.s hereby amended so that the area of the easement
� �a is expanded to the southerly 15 feet of the property owned by
�' '� Savage, described above. Except as amended herein, the easement
" o remains in full force and effect. Savage acknowledges receigt of
V consideration for this amendment to the easement.
Dated: �--/���d_. ¢f _
' PETER A. SAVAGE
i>.:.
�',.: CL:�r L '`-�iZ i'tfty�'�/,
' ' ANI�I SAVAvE
- ///
` ///
PAGE 1 - ANi"NDMENT TO EASEMENT •Z12299
1 ��
Jul 03 03 11: 04p Daniel J. Boyden (5411 386-9375 p. 6
STATE QF OREGON )
} SS.
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON )
This instrument was ackr.owledged before me on this � .�
day of / : , ; ,_ • , %�l�j �Y Peter A. Savage. �^ti, `
/ ,i -""_ / J /'. � ..
� / �^�
�. �%:- .,� ,:%:�./- --
NCfiP�ffY-.-�1�I�b "
4 � oFFian�s�
(.='�j HARBARA HASKINS
STATE OF OREGON ) f• � Nt •.aRV PU`iL�C QREGON
) SS. � '�n 32?G4A
I�. �' . '.'�t I`;.?003
couiv�rY oF W �Ilh���✓�t � �— = .
This instrument was acknowledged on this � day of
�, �,t�/ , �CX� by Ann Savage.
Ct� f�_��'�wls��.
NOTARY PUBLIC FOR OREGQIV
OFFICIAL��IL
C 01NFl�qEDEL
` NOTARY PU�lCrO�Gl�1�1
COA�NSSION N0.308936
M11f C08�W15SInp�=xwitE;FEB t3.200R
PAGE 2 - AMENDMENT TO EASENfENT . 112299
�
UL l J GYJlJ 1 1 G • 1 O r�C l. I 1 l..-UGV/ ULUR . JV�.J JYJJ �1 ! l f OGJ I V JJGJ0�IJJJCJYJ r .rl i � U 1
C �-IICAGO �ITLE
� DEVELOPMEN � SERVICES
10001 S. E. SUNNYSIDE ROAD
CT.ACKAMAS� ORBGON 97015
TRANSMITTAL Sf-IEE'T
TO: FROM:
Pazn Boyd Bill McCorkle, Pro�ect Coordinator
GOM P AN Y: n ATk=
LDC Design Group l.9 July, 2001
PAX NUMHER: TOTAL NO.OP I'ACES[NCLUDIAIG COVER:
645-5500 S
PHONE NUMBEK: SENDER'S R$FARFNCF.NUMBER:
IiE: YOUR REFERENCE NUM6ER:
Morford
❑ URGENT x FOR REVIEW ❑PLEASE COMMENT ❑PLEASE REPLY ❑PLEASE RBr.YS:G�
NOTFS/COMM EMS:
8111
Fax: 50 3-471-7823 Mobile: 503-789-6961
Email: McCorWeB�[r}ctt.com Direct Line: 50�794-5587
"Helpi�rg You Build the Futx�e"
P'HONE 503-794-5887•FAX 303-471-7823 •EMAIL MCCORKLEBQ,CTT�COM
,�yL 1 J LCJCJ 1 1 L • 1 U 1 f� t. ( 1 �+ ULV� ULLI\ � JV\r.J JV�J � 1 1 1 VLV t V JJVVV'yJ.JJVV i � �� v �
Order No: 230052
DESCRIPTION
(Contirauedy
GENERAL EXCEPTIONS (Standard Coverage Policies only)
1. a. Taxes or assessmez�ta which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any
tar.ing authorxty that levies taxes or assessments on real property ox by Che
public recorda.
b. Proceedinga by a public agency which may result i.n Caxes or assessments, or
notices of such proceedings, whether or noc shown by the records of �uch agency
or by Che public records.
2 . a_ Easements, liena, encumbrances, ir►terests or ciaims thexeof which are not
ahown by the public records .
b. Any facts, rights, interestis or claims �rhxch are noc shown by the public
records but Which could be ascertaxned by an inapecrion of the land or by
• making itaqufry of persons in posseeaion thereof.
3 . DiscrepanCies, conflicts in boundary linea, shortage in area, encroachments, or
any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown
by the public records.
4 , a. Unpatented mining claims;
b. Reservati.ons or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance
thereoF;
c. Water righta, claims or title to water;
whecher or not the matters excepted under (a) , (b? , o� (c) are shown by the public
records.
5 . Any lien or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereaf�er
furni.ahed, imposed by l�+w and not shown by the public recorde.
J V�. ! J Gl�Jrl l 1 G • 1 J rR l. I 1�.-LGV/ DLU1[ . JVL.J JCIJ ti f 1 f OGJ 1 V JJl'JJ0�IJJJCJC7 r .CJJ� CJ (
Order No: 230052
SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS
6 . Taxes for the fiecal year 2001-2002, a lien but not yet payab�e.
7. The premises herein described are within and aubject to the atatutory powezs
includ�ng the power of assessment of Clean Water Services.
8_ Regulations, including levies, liens, asaessments, righta of way, and eseements
of Tualatin Valley Water District.
9. City liene, if any, of the Cicy of Tigard.
10_ An easement created by instrument, including terms and provisione thereof;
Dated: January 14, 2000
kecorded: January 19, 2000
Recorder' s Fee No. : 2000003720
In Favor Of: Adjacent property owners
For: Landscaping
Affects: The Southerly 5 feet of �he Wes�erly 100 feet ot Parcel
I
il. A copy of the terms and provisions of the Operating Agreement for Fineview Farm,
LLC, an Oregon limited liability company should be furnished for our examination
prior to closing. Any conveyance or encumbrance of the real property owned by
the Limited Liability Company must be executed in accordance with the Operating
Agreement or i.f the Operating Agreement contains no euch provisions, a majority
of the managers as provided in OttS 63.150. In addition, if there have been any
changes in membership from the date of original creation of the Limited Liability
Company to the present date, copies of approval of �ithdr8wal and acceptance of
tbe new member should be furniahed for our examination.
(.Atfecta Parcel I)
NOTE: Taxes for the fiacal year 2000-2001, paid in full.
Original Amount: 51,482.12, ir►cluding
Speciai Assessment: Meczger Park
Levy Code: 023-91
ACCOUrit No. : R270904
Map No. : 1S135AA
Tax Lot No. : 00901
(Affects a portion of Parcel II and other propercy a]so)
NOTE: Taxea for Lhe fiscal year 2000-2001, pai.d in full.
Original Amount: g461,33, including
Special Assessment: Metzger Park
Levy Code: 023-A1
Account No. : R270959
Map No. : iS135AA
Tax Lot No. : 01000
(Affects a portion of Parcel I and a portion of Parcel II)
(Concinued)
Order No: 230052
SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS (Continued)
� NOTE: ?axes for the ffscal year 2000-2ooi, paid in fuli.
Original Atnount: $4.01, including
Special Assessment: Metzgex Park
Le�y Code: 023-81
Account No. : R1217301
Map No. : iS135AA
Tax Loc No. : 01301
(Affects a portion of Parcel II)
END OF RfiPORT
cc: LDC Design Group
pam Soyd
TS/gs
July 19, 2001
JUL 1 � Lbbl 1G : 1� rK LI1L-LtV/�LUK.SVLb �b� 4f1 (�« IU y�b�b455�bb r.b�/b !
Order No: 230052
L$t3AL DgSCRIPTxON
PARCEL I:
A portion of Lots 1, 2 and 12, elock, 19; Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 20; and Lot 9, Block
21, TOWN OF METZGER, a plat of reCVrd in Washington County, TOGETHER WITH portipns O�
vacated S.w, Madison Street, vacated S.W. Maplelea� Street (Maple S�reet West) , and
vacated Maple Street EasC, situated in the NorCheest one-quarter O� Che NorCheast
one-quarter of Section 35, Township 1 South, Range 1 west, Willamette Meridian, in the
City of Tigard, County of Washington and Scate of Oregon, bei.ng more particu].arly
described as follo�s:
Beginning at the interseCtion of the Eastexly r�.ght o£ way 7.i.ne of S.W. 90th Avenue
(Monroe Street} , a 50.00 foot wfde public roadway, with the centerline of vacated S.W.
Mapleleaf Street (Maple Street West) , said point of beginnxng bears North 00°35' O8"
West 25.00 feet �xom the Northwest corner of Lot 4, Block 19, T'OWN' OF METZGER; thence
along the centerline of said vacated S.W. Mapleleaf Street, Noxth 89°28'00" East,
105.29 feet; thence leaving said line, South 53°33'99" East, 57.62 feet; thence NorLh
79°23' 04�� East, 60.89 feet; thence North 30°03' 49" East, 27.87 feet to the centerline
of said vecsted S.W. M2►pleleaf Street; thence along said centerline, Nvrth 89°28' 00"
East, 237.31 feet �o the Westerly right of way line of the abandoned Oregon Electric
Rai].road; chence along said Westerly right of way line, along the arc vf a 1885.08
foot radius non-tangent curve concave to the Northvesc, through a central angle of
10°45'25" (chord beare South 41°35' S7" west, 353.39 feet) a distance of 353.91 feet to
the centerline of vacated S.W. Madison Stxeet; thence along said centerline, North
00°35� 09" west, 97.05 feet; chence leaving eaid centerline, South 89°28' 00" West,
125.20 feet to the West line of Lot 12, Slock 19, TOWN OF METZGER; thence along eaid
lzne, and continuing along the West line of Lot 2, Block 19, said plat and the
Northerly extensi.on thereof, North 00°35� 09�� west, 150,02 feet; thence leaving said
line, along a line parallel with and 15.00 feet distant and Southerly from che
centerline of said vacated S.W. Mapleleaf Street, South 89°2A' 00" West, 100_26 feet to
the Easterly right of way li.ne of said S.w. 90th Avenue; thence along said right of
way line, North 00°35' OB" We9t, 15.00 feet to the point of begxnn�ing.
PARCEL IZ:
A portion of Lots 9, 9 and 10, Block 9 and a portion of Lots 1 and 2, Block �.9, TOWN
OF METZGER, a plat of record in Washingtors County, TOG�THER wITH porcions of vacated
S.W. Madison SLreet and vacated S_W. Mapleleaf Streec (Maple Street west) , situated in
the Northeast one-quaz�ter of the Northeast one-quarter of Section 35, Township 1
South, Range � Weat, Willamette Meridian, in the CiLy of Tigard, County of washington
and Scate of Oregon, being more particularly @escribed as fvllowa:
Beginning at the interaection of the Easterly right of way line of S.W. 90ch Avenue
(Monroe Street) , a 50.00 foot wi,de public roadway, with the centexline of vacated S.w.
Maple�eaf Street (Maple Street west) , said point of beginning bears North 00°35'06"
West 25 .00 feet from Che Northwest corner of Lot 4, Block 19, TOwN �F METZGF3R; thence
along Lhe Easterly rzght of way line of said S.W, 9�th Avenue, North 00°35' 08" West,
15. 00 feec; thence leaving aaid line, along a ixne parallel with and 15.00 feet
distant and Norcheriy from the centerline of said vacated S.W. Mapleleaf Street, North
e9°29� 00" East, e8.z9 feet; thence leaving said centerline, Nerth 00°35'08" West,
85.00 feet to the North line of the SouCh 75.00 feet of Lot 8, Block 4, TOwN OF
METZGER; ther►ce along said North iine, and c�ntinui.ng along the North line of the
South 75.00 feet of Lots 9 and i0, Block 4, said plat, and tihe Easterly extension
thereof, North e9°28' 00" East, 137.22 feet to the centeriine of said vacated S.W.
Madison Street; thence along said line, South 00°35'OB" East, 100.00 feet to the
Order No: 230052
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
centerline of said vacated S.w_ Mapleleaf Street; thence leaving said cenCerline,
South 30°03'48" Weat, 27,87 feet; thence South 79°23'04^ West, 60.89 feet; thence
North 53°33'99" West, 57.62 Feet to the centerline of said vacated S.W, Mapleleaf
Street; thence along said centerline, South B9°28'00�' WesC, �05.29 feet to the point
of beginning.
r
J UL, 1 y Gl�b 1 1 G : Gb r K l, I 1 l..—UtVi tfLLK .5v1,5 �b,.S 4 f 1 ftsG�s I V ��b.Sb4J'�bYJ r . r� r� e� �
_. . � - 1�1lIAL� jN��T
� • rew• •� ��Yt��
_ I _ _ . . ' �.� � +�'r'�er ——— �. ... � �� . - --
ti '
.
- . • � � � i 4
dd �' ■0' •o' � ' Mt . �v ' � M� . //A�
`903 I � 900 � � � b02 � � 1�0 � a �''�l�
a � I � e� ia 1 s ' � � � �. d ►��,�
� , � I � �� S I '� � �� w� - . '` � �� !t �
� .�� � ._ s. � � i 4..r.� �?t— � —R . •� ` .� ,
W + ,w • ���.
� �9� � '12 � r� $ � 12� ,s. d00 s 00 /
Q _ T � __ -- — —I �-�' eos y I ` ..��, .
+ �2 � � �� �' M W � �. � � ;�
• g lC-5.1�1�1Ot3s) ��� � - -� � � �QT _ �I I i�e � - �� � t`�; �
� �L. . �� / /, :
11 T I �—T i eoe i � W � r � .
_ � 9°' � � I � � r � aoo � � � i � � "� �
t� e . � � � � � ► ,�. , � ����J''� �C
. .. � { � � � • �p. � , � �.
. 7 � �S o � � ��4'_J �Z,f�!'.a4l�� �s�..�J y / .-
.�
_ �a.� � � ' ` � .
� -- --- _ 1 ; --�T p� . • � � `
Q •��' �e �, I r"N '_1 ��' � �sar . /
. �
� R a I �� � I ��:I I � ' ' i .
I ° � I � o
t00 � - I v 1 ' � �� � e
� , 1►�
, ,� ,
, �ioo T 2_ _"io� ' � ' �eo�,�,s_rr �-- s��.a�'
P
�S l2 • !
�i N 110! � �� i'1301
o ( �'
� � • $ � a�l .� � SEE wAP
6 —1 — ��--� ... � .— :� l7�e � IS I' 36AA �
, � � , . . l SUr►LEM[NTAL
� r 1102 � 10�100 � ��. 1200 j . NG.1
� _ �. _ �l L�
e �,a�s� �
eo' ��• �oo' 9 ee' a ���.t' T�o� .
�o, �1200 � � �3�00 ' ;3707 ' r�- � ;'
�� a ��� 370d �53.
� � (�t.l IM. 1i M�I
. 3902 ' 3 9 Ot .•ti , � . � i��L
. �e�.e. -
J7i0�J 3?OI ]70� �
CHICAGO T(Y�E INSURANCE COMPANY �� 2
i � � �'w� . ± r
N naD number �- ^� � � �
This Dlat is for your aid i� locating � : �
your land with reference to streets and ��, �� � � 3�
others parcels• While thi5 plat is . � � (
believed to be correct, the company � '
assumes no liahility for any loss : � � I(�`� � � �
occurring by reason of reliance �� w �
thereon• 1 J 1 � � .1 �
� •aJy' ► .• ` f
•.1
W W Tl1T(11 D�GC fii7 YYr
, � � ; � , �
� f
FAX TRANSMITTAL MEMO
TO: City of Tigard, Planning
ATTN: Matt Scheidegger
FAx #: 503-684-7297
DATE: 9/2/03
Re: Fineview partitions - impact study
MESSAGE: Hi Matt. As you requested, enclosed are impact studies
for the two Fineview partitions. These should satisfy the requirements of TDC
18.390.040.e. Please contact me if you need anything else. Thanks Matt.
cc. Dan Boyden
■Phone So3. 62¢-¢625 >Fax 503.968.i6�¢ ■ejmurphy@aol.com
. �
Fineview—MLP 20�3-00011
SUPPLEMENTAL TO FINEVIEW PARTITION#1 APPLICATION, MLP 2003-00011
Section 18.390.040 of the Tigard Development Code requires an impact
study.
e. Include an impact study.The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on
public facilities and services.The study shall address,at a minimum,the transportation
system,including bikeways,the drainage system,the parks system,the water system,the
sewer system,and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and
type of impact,the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards and to
minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems,and
affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code
requires the dedication of real property interests,the applicant shall either specifically concur
with the dedication requirements,or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the
real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of
the development.
Impact Analysis.
1. Transportation system. There are just under 10 trips per day
generated from a single-family detached home. There will be two homes
built on this property as a result of this partition, which will add almost 20
trips per day onto SW 9�th Avenue, a local street and other streets such as
SW Locust, a collector street. No new streets will be created. This amount
of traffic on the existing streets woufd not be considered significant, or
degrade the level of service on the street. There is nothing in the
Transportation System plan indicating a capacity problem in this area. (The
closest recommended improvements are improvements to the intersection of
SW Hall and SW Oak, widening of SW Hall to five lanes, and widening of SW
Greenburg north of SW Locust to five lanes). No dedication of right-of-way is
necessary, according to the City Engineer.
SW Hall, which is only about 1300 feet away from this development, is a
transit route.
There are no bicycle lanes on SW 90th Avenue, or on any of the nearby
streets. No bikeways are identified on the pedestrian/bikeway plan through
this property. The amount of bicycle traffic that will be generated from the
two new homes is not significant.
The new homes will contribute to the funds available for system-wide
improvements through payment of the Transportation Improvement Fee
(TIF).
2. Drainacle. The property drains to the east and the south, towards the
wetland area. Drainage from the shared driveway will be piped to the edge
of the wetland through a 12" concrete pipe, and then released into a riprap
pad. The site plan will accommodate the upstream drainage adjacent to this
development. The partition will not significantly increase the amount of
runoff into the public system. Clean Water Services has already provided a
rt1m��mhv.�a cc(ri atrclfi nPViPw#11ci�nn�Q!(1�/(1'i �
Fineview—MLP 2W3-WO11
service letter, accepting the proposed drainage system. The new homes will
contribute to the funds available for system-wide improvements through
payment of the water quality fee (in-lieu-o�.
3. Parks. There will be some use of nearby parks, such as Metzger Park.
Residents may also use the school grounds during non-school hours. The
new homes will contribute to the funds available for system-wide park
improvements through payment of the Parks SDC.
4. Water. The water system has the capacity to serve this development.
There are two public water lines available in SW 90th Avenue, a 16" line and a
6" line. There will be no significant impact to the water system as a result of
this two-lot development. The new homes will contribute to the funds
available for system-wide improvements through payment of the Water SDC.
5. Sewer. The sewer system has the capacity to serve this development.
There is an existing sewer main in SW 90`h Avenue. There will be no
significant impact to the sewer system as a result of this two-lot
development. The new homes will contribute to the funds available for
system-wide improvements through payment of the Sewer SDC.
6. Noise. There will be construction-related noise generated during
construction of the driveway and utilities, and then the homes. After
construction, there will be no significant noise impact on the neighborhood.
P�imnmhv.QracariafPClfinrviawill/c�mnlQ7l1�!(1� 7
� �
Fineview—MLP 2003-00012
SUPPLEMENTAL TO FINEVIEW PARTITION#2 APPLICATION, MLP 2003-00012
Section 18.390.040 of the Tigard Development Code requires an impact
study.
e. Include an impact study.The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on
public facilities and services.The study shall address,at a minimum,the transportation
system,including bikeways,the drainage system,the parks system,the water system, the
sewer system,and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and
type of impact,the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards and to
minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems,and
affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code
requires the dedication of real property interests,the applicant shall either specifical(y concur
with the dedication requirements,or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the
real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of
the development.
Impact Analysis.
1. Transportation system. There are just under 10 trips per day
generated from a single-family detached home. There will be two homes
built on this property as a result of this partition, which will add almost 20
trips per day onto SW 90ih Avenue, a local street and other streets such as
SW Locust, a collector street. No new streets will be created. This amount
of traffic on the existing streets would not be considered significant, or
degrade the level of service on the street. There is nothing in the
Transportation System plan indicating a capacity problem in this area. (The
closest recommended improvements are improvements to the intersection of
SW Hall and SW Oak, widening of SW Hall to five lanes, and widening of SW
Greenburg north of SW Locust to five lanes). No dedication of right-of-way is
necessary, according to the City Engineer.
SW Hall, which is only about 1300 feet away from this development, is a
transit route.
There are no bicycle lanes on SW 90th Avenue, or on any of the nearby
streets. No bikeways are identified on the pedestrian/bikeway plan through
this property. The amount of bicycle traffic that will be generated from the
two new homes is not significant.
The new homes will contribute to the funds available for system-wide
improvements through payment of the Transportation Improvement Fee
(TIF).
2. Drainage. The property drains to the east and the south, towards the
wetland area. Drainage from the shared driveway will be piped to the edge
of the wetland through a 12" concrete pipe, and then released into a riprap
pad. The site plan will accommodate the upstream drainage adjacent to this
development. The partition will not significantly increase the amount of
runoff into the public system. Clean Water Services has already provided a
Prim�imhvR�accnri atvclfi nFVi rw#?Ic�irm/9/(l�!(1'� �
Fineview—MLP 2003-000 1 2
service letter, accepting the proposed drainage system. The new homes will
contribute to the funds available for system-wide improvements through
payment of the water quality fee (in-lieu-o�.
3. Parks.There will be some u5e of nearby parks, such as Metzger Park.
Residents may also use the school grounds during non-school hours. The
new homes will contribute to the funds available for system-wide park
improvements through payment of the Parks SDC.
4. Water. The water system has the capacity to serve this
development. There are two public water lines available in SW 90t" Avenue,
a 16" line and a 6" line. There will be no significant impact to the water
system as a result of this two-lot development. The new homes will
contribute to the funds available for system-wide improvements through
payment of the Water SDC.
5. Sewer. The sewer system has the capacity to serve this
development. There is an existing sewer main in SW 90th Avenue. These
lots will connect to the sewer through a sewer line that will be constructed in
an easement between tax lots IS135AAOlOQ1 and IS135AA01002, adjacent
to this development. There will be no significant impact to the sewer system
as a result of this two-lot development. The new homes will contribute to the
funds available for system-wide improvements through payment of the
Sewer SDC.
6. Noise. There will be construction-related noise generated during
construction of the driveway and utilities, and then the homes. After
construction, there will be no significant noise impact on the neighborhoad.
Prlmi imhvR.accrri a1PClfi nrvi rw#?/c��nn/9/M/(l� 7.
Rug 27 03 02: 39p M�•^phy 5�39681674 P, z
°� . . �• _ �1���z�o'�
, ; . File Number
. ��a��at�� �e�r�c�s ��� rZ ���
• C]tiX so��cnrltnuit i3 clear.
- Clean Water Services
Service Provider Let#er
Jurisdiction _ Tigard Date 8/22/03
Map 8�Tax Lot 1 S135AA 00901/01000 Owner Dan Boyden
Contact Fishman Environmental
Site Address E_ of SW 90 & S. of Liz French
SW Locust St, Tigard Address 434 NW 6 , Suite 304
Proposed Activity Land partition Portland, OR 97209-3600
Phone 503.224.0333
Thls form and the attached conditions will serve as your Service Provider Letter in
accordance with Clean Water Services Deslgn and Constructlon Standards (R&O 03-11).
YES NO r YES NO
Natural Resources Altematives Analysis
Assessment(NRA) � � Required I � �
Subrnitted (Section 3.02_6)
District Site Visit � � Tier 1 Altematives Analysis � �
Qate: 8/20/03
Concur with NRA/or � � Tier 2 Alternatives Analysis � �
submitted information
Sensitive Area Present � ❑ Vegetated Corridor ❑ �
On-Site Averaging
Sensitive Area P�esent � ❑ Vegetated Corridor � ❑
Off-Site Mitigation Required
Vegetated Corridar � � On-Site Mitigation � �
Present On-Site
Width of Vegetated r� ❑
Corridor(feet) Z5 t� Off-Site Mitigation U
Condition of Vegetated Planting Plan Attached � ❑
Gorridor Degraded Final plantlnp plan�equired
prior to construcUon
Enhancement Required � � �nhancement/restoratton
completion date
Encroachment into
Vegetated Cotridor � � RSAT(no longer required) � � �
(Sectlon 3.02.4}
Type and Square Footage � Geotechnical Report ❑ �
of Enc�oachment required
Al(owed Use � � Conditions Attached � �
(Section 3.02.4.b.2}
This Service Provider Letter does NOT eliminate#he need to evaluate and protect
water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered on your
property.
Page 1 of 3
Rug 27 03 02: 39p Murphy 5n39681674 p. 3
� ' File Number
_ Z�S
In order tv compty with Clean Water Services (Ehe District) water quality
protection requirements the project must comply with the following conditions:
Standard Conditions
1. No structures,developmer�t, constructlon activities,gardens, lawns, applica6on of chemicals,
uncontained areas of hazardous materials as defined by Oregon Depa�tment of Envlronmental
Quality, pet wastes, dumping of materials of any kind,or other activities shall be perrnitted within
the sensitive area which may negatively impact water quality,except those allowed by Section
3.02.3.b.
2. No structures,development, construction activities, gardens, lawns,appfication of chemicals,
uncontained areas of hazardaus materials as defined by Oregon Department of Environmental
� Quality, pet wastes, dttmping of materials of any klnd,or other activities shall be permitted within
the vegetated corrldor whtch may negati�ely impact wate�quality,except thoss allowed by
Section 3.02.4.b.2).
3. Prior to any site clearing,grading or construction the vegetated corridor and water quality
sensitive areas shall be surveyed,staked, and temporarfly fenced per approved plan. During
construction the vegetated comdor shaN remain fenced and undisturbed except as allowed by
Section 3.02.5.a and per appraved plans. �
4. For vegetated corridors 50 feet wide or greater,the first 50 feet closest to the sensitive area shall
be equal to or better than a"good"corridor condition as defined in Section 3.02.7, Table 3.2.
5. For vegetated corridors less than 50 feet wide, the entire vegetated corridor shall be equal to or
better than a"good"corridor condition as defined in Section 3.02.7,Table 3.2.
6. An approved Oregon Department of Forestry Notification is required for one or mo�e trees
harvested for sale,trade,or barter,on any non-federal lands within the State of Oregon.
7. Clean Water Services shall be notified 72 hau�s prior to the start and completion of
enhancement/restoration activities. Enhancement/resto�atiot�activities shal!comply with the
guidelines p�ovided in Landscape Requirements(R8.0 03-11:Appendix D).
8. Protectton of tha vegetated corridors and associated sensitive areas shall be provided by the
installation of permanent fencinca and signage between the development and the outer iimits of
the vegetated corridors.
9. Appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's)for Eroslon Control, in accordance wlth the
CWS Erosion Control Technlcal Guidance Manual shall be used prior to,during, and following
earth disturbing activities.
10. Prior to construction, a Stormwater Connectlon Pem�it from the District or its designee is required
pursuant to Ordinance 27, Section 4.B.
11. For any developments,which creafe multipte parcels or lots intended for sepa�ate ownership,the
Distrlct shall require that the vegetated co�ridor and the sensitive area be contained in a separate
tract.
12. The District or City/County may require an easement over the vegetated comdor conveying
storm. surtace water management,and/or sanitary sewer rights to the District o�City that would
p�event the owner of the vegetated corridor ftom acGvities and uses inconsistent with the pucpose
of the co�ridor and any easements therein.
Page 2 of 3
I
Flug 27 03 02: 40p Mu�^PI^�y 5^99681674 P- 4 II
.
' File Number
Z�S
� Special Conditions
13. The vegeta#ed conidar width for sensitive areas within tha project site shall be a minimum of 25
feet wide,as measured horizontally from the delineated boundary of the sensitive area.
14. Prlor to any activity within Ehe sensitive area, the applicant shalt gain authorization for the project
irom the Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL)and US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The
applicant shall provide the DisMct wiEh copies of all DSL and USACE project authorization
permits.
15. Prior to Installation of plant materials,all invasive vegetation within the vegetated corridor shaA be
removed. During removal of lnvasive vegeta#ion care shall be taken to minimize impacts to
existing native trees and shrub species.
16. Enhancement/restoration of the vegetated corridor shall be provided In accordance with the
attached planting plan and R&O 03-11,Appendix D.
17. Prior to any site clearing, grading or constructlon, the applicant shall provide the District with the
required vegetated corridor enhancement/restoration plan in compiiance with R&O 03-11.
18. Maintenance and monitaring requirements shalt comply with Section 2.1 i 2 of R&O 03-11. ff at
any time during the warra�ty period the landscaping falls below the 80°/a sunriva!{evel,the Owner
shafl reinstall a!I deficient planting at the next appropriate planting opportunity and the two year
maintenance period shall begin egaln from the date of replanting.
19. Perfo�mance assurances for the vegetated corridor shaA comply with Section 2.06.2,Tabte 2-1.4
and Section 2.10,Table 2-2.2.
20. Activities tocated within the 100-year floodplain shall comply wlth Section 3.13 of R&O 03-11.
21. Remova!of native,woody vegetation shatl be minirnized to the greatest extent practicable.
22. A Maintenance Plan shall be included on final p(ans, induding methods, responsible party contact
information, and dates(minimum two times per year,by June 1 and September 30).
Please call (503) 846-364T with any questions.
����
��
Colin MacLaren
Site Assessment Coordinator
Attachments(1)
Page 3 of 3
i � . � ED MURPHY �t ASSOCIATES
��� l,utir! i'.��r- Plnrt�tinr� a�r�! U��r��lol�iii��itl S��r�ri����.��
May 28, 2003
Matt Scheidegger, Assistant Planner
City of Tigard - Community Development Department
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, Oregon 97223
RE: Applications for Minor Partitions, "Fineview"
WCTM iS135AA, Tax Lots 901 and 1000.
Dear Mr. Scheidegger:
As we discussed previously, the owners of the tax lots referenced above would like
to re-apply for the two partitions that were approved by the City in May of 2000.
The approval expired before the �nal plats were submitted. The previous �le
numbers are MLP 1999-00017 and MLP 1999-00018. (Note, however, that the tax
lot numbers have changed. What was tax lot 1301 is now tax lot 1000, and what
was formerly tax lot 1000 is now tax lot 901.)
I checked with Heidi Berg at the Clean Water Services agency, who informed me of
the following:
i. Because the wetland area, both on- and off-site, is less than i/2 acre, the
setback required for the buffer area would be 25', not 50'. (The wetland area is
only about 11,200 square feet). The previously proposed partition of the
property which has the wetland on it, iS135AA0901, called for the creation oF a
separate tract of land that would encompass the wetland area, including the 25'-
wide buffer area. Ms. Berg said that the same buffer width would be acceptable
today.
2. The wetland determination and delineation analysis should be relatively recent,
i.e., it should not be more than five years old. The wetland determination and
delineation report was compteted by SRI/Shapiro in April of 1998. However,
according to Ms. Berg, the five year time period starts on the date that the
Division of State Lands (DSL) accepts the report. As you can see from the
attached letter from Annette Lalka to Philip Morford, the DSL concurred with the
conclusions of the wetland delineation report on March 7, 2000. That means
that the previously submitted wetland determination and delineation report is
still valid today.
3. The only thing that CWS will require is a natural resource assessment of the
current condition of the wetland buffer area. We have just initiated that
assessment, and expect to have it compteted soon.
g875 S�b' Mz�rrinck St. 'fiyar��l. Oregon 97zz4
/ Phone 503. 6z4.q6s,S /Cellular So3. 3i.q.o677 /Fax 503. g68.�674
Because the situation is virtually the same as when these partitions were approved
in June of 2000 (that is, the zone and the applicable standards have not changed),
we can keep this very simple and straight-forward. The City already has in its files
the complete application materials, including the SRI/Shapiro report. We are not
proposing any changes to the partition plans. Therefore, you should be able to
easily process these applications using the previously submitted documents and the
previously written staff report. Therefore, we would like to waive the pre-
application conference, and start the review process.
Attached are the Following:
• Two application forms
• Two separate checks for $1935 each
• Two sets of mailing labels for each application
• A copy of the letter from DSL, dated 3/7/00
• The first page of the Notice of Type II Decision" for each partition, for
reference.
We will complete the natural resource assessment, submit it to the Clean Water
Services Agency and the City, and subsequently obtain a service provider letter
from Clean Water Services as quickly as we can.
Please feel free to call me if you have any questions or need additional information.
Thank-you Matt.
Sincerely,
�
Ed Murphy, AICP
cc: Dan Boyden
ejm/boyden/finev;ew/manleds128/o3 2
� � :
s
i "
t
.�
�
a ,
1
NOTICE OF TYPE il DECISION
MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 1999-00018 aTYOFTi�ARo
�� X` � FINEVIEW PARTITIUN #2 s��n AB��co�n=
�.
� �
����._ �. �8 �
120 DAYS = 08/29/2000
SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY
FILE NAME: FINEVIEW PARTITION #2
CASE NO: Minor Land Partition (MLP) MLP1999-00018
PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Minor Land Partition approval to partition a parcel of
land within the city limits of Tigard. The parcel is 1.20 acres. The proposal is to
divide the property into two parcels of 10,094 square feet and 8,933 square feet
with 33,245 square feet in a tract for wetlands. Both parcels will have
approximately 15 feet of frontage along SW 90�' Avenue.
APPLICANT: Fineview Farm, L.L.C.
15500 SW Jay Street
Beaverton, OR 97006
OWNER: Pacific Crest Partners -- �
1430 Eastside Road
Hood River, OR 97031
ZONING
DESIGNATION: R-4.5, Low Density Residential. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to
accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential
units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached
single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses
are also permitted conditionally. _
LOCATION: Located east of SW 90"' Avenue, 330 feet south of SW Locust Street;
WCTM 1 S135AA, Tax Lot �-39�. I o00.
PROPOSED PARCEL 1: 8,933 Square Feet.
�'ROPOSED PARCEL 2: 10,094 Square Feet.
�APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.745,
18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
�ECTION II. DECISION
Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has
APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions.
The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section V.
MLP1999-00018/FINEVIEW PARTITION Page 1 of 12
CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT �
� CIiT Of iIOARD
�
� � I � � , �-----------:�
.y I � � � TL 806 �
I � I
I
� cn I r--------T--�--- -----------� I
TL 100 i � I � TL 901 � TL 1000 � � I
i � �j'�/ TL 800 � /�
I I �--------
� I I � �' � --�
--J � I I ',' i I / /
--- I
SW MAPLE I-- -�--�---._ .......:/ i
,
'� TL t3et Ia oa TRACT "A"
-----------, � TL 1001 � PROPOSED r�=.._.._
� � . Parcel 1 y:•:-i�\
I � � .' .-i �+-1
I I �� '/ .• �� _ :.� ..1'.�
I
I j PROPOSED\.` � �.:: ...'.:. • :' :� .
. . ..
.•� �.. .�
TL 100 � �--------- Parcel 2 :`- -.j /,',.•�� .{
� � I 'a�%-.".'... . _% {; �' ��Q'
� � / � .-,-:�'� �0
� � TL 1002 .' . ,•;-••:..�•' G
�.; . J .Z. ��----
i � i
j � �---------- �.�..�"�•' -- pPO�� .� �
i � ` P��� ��
I TL 1101 '��. Q' i
i i i '.\ 0��� �i�
� � � :.\ Q �i
I I • ' POP� ��
� ----- ' �
i r----------�------- _ �,
i
� j TL 1102 I TL 1100 �i � 401 �i� SCALE.• 1"=40'
� � � � i i TL 1200
C'� OF TIG�RD � FINEVIEW PARTITION #2 __----
LEGEND
SITE PLAN � (MLP)1999-00018 PROPOSED PARTITION LINE
(Map is not to scale) _____________________
May 27 03 02: 54p Mur�h� 50�9681674 p. l
. �
� � , � • � ►
FAX TRANSMITTAL MEMO
To: City of Tigard, Planning
ATTN: Matt Scheidegger
FAx #: 5�3-684-7297
DATE: 5J28/03
RE: Fineview partitions, Wetland Delineation
MESSAGE: Hi Matt, Here is the letter from DSL I promised you.
■Phone 503. F24-4625 ■Fax 503.968.i674 >ejmurphy@aoi.corn
May 27 03 02: 54p Mur—hy 50�9681674 p. 2
. ,
r
. ^ ��
�..Z.1 �^
/'�!'�
����? �-Y,, �� re on Division of State Lands
� 775 Summer Street NE
Joha A.Kitzhaber,M.D.,C�vernor
Salem,OR 973Q1-1279
(503)378-3805
FAX(503}378-4544
TTY(503)378-4615
March 7, 2000 RECE��E�P�AN�1�G
State Land Board
�AR 0 ;� 2�Q0 John A. Kitzhaber
Governor
Mr. Phllip Morfo�d CITY QF TIGARD 6it1 Bradbury
17582 Cardinal Drive Secretary oEState
Lake Oswego, Oregon 97034 ]im Hill
State Treasurer
Re: Wetland Delineation for JefFerson Street property located fn
T1S, R1W, S�ction 35 in Tigard, Oregon. C3et#99-0493
Dear Mr. Morford:
1 have reviewed the wetland delineation report for the above-�eferenced site. Based on
data submitted by Cofin Maclaren of Shapiro and Associates along with his site visit this
month verifying conditions, I concur with the conclusions. The wetland areas mapped
in Figure 4 of the report are subject to the permit requirements of the state Removal-Fill
Law (ORS 196.800-196.990). A state permit is required for fill or excavatinn of 50 cubic
yards or more in the wetland area. This concurrence is for purposes of the state
Removal-Fill Law oniy; federal or local wetland permit requiremen#s may apply as well.
The Army Corps of Engineers witl review the report and make a determination for
purposes of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act at the time that a permit applicatio� is
submitted. We recommend that you attach a copy of this concurrence IetEer to any
subsequent DSL ancf Corps permit applications to speed application review.
Please be aware that state law establishes a preference for avoidance of we#land
impacts. Because measures to avoid and minimize wetland impacts may include
reconfiguring parcel layout and size or development design, we recommend fihat you
work with Bill Parks, the Division Resource Coordinator for this area (378-3805, ext.
234) on appropriate site design before completing the city or county land use approvai
process.
Division approval of wetland delineation reports is based upon the info�mation provided
to us. Shoufd additional information be brought to our attention or shou(d site
conditions change, we will consider the new information and re-evaluate the site and
our jurisdictional determination as needed.
k:\wedands\det-wn lefters11999199-0493philipmorford.doc
.����
May 27 03 02: 55p Murvhy 50�9681674 p. 3
• - :�
Thank you for your report. if I can answer any questions for you, please do not hesitate
to contact me at (503) 378-3805, ext. 233.
Sin ely,
� -���;�'�
Annette Lalka
Wetland Inventory Specialist
Wetlands Program
Enc. .
cc: Colin Maclaren, Shapiro & Associates
Jeffery Kee, LDC Design Group
City of Tigard, Planning Department
.fan Stuart, Corps of Engineers
LWI file
�
� �
. �
k:lwetlandsldet-wn letters11999199-0493philipmorford.doc �
I
2-LOT PARTITION
FI N EVI E W - PARTITION ## 2
M LP 2003 - 00012
( FORMERLY M LP 1999-00018�
SUBMITTED BY :
ED MURPHY & ASSOCIATES
O !V BEHALF OF :
DAN BOYDEN, FINEVIEW FA �tM LLC
Ju�Y 23, 2003
♦�♦ ED MURPHY �t ASSOCIATES
� Larzd Use Ylannzng and llevefopmc�zt Services
July 23, 2003
Matt Scheidegger, Assistant Planner
City of Tigard - Community Development Department
13125 SW Hail Blvd.
Tigard, Oregon 97223
RE: Application for Minor Partition, "Fineview - Partition #2"
WCTM iS135AA, Tax Lot 1000.
Dear Mr. Scheidegger:
Thank you for your letter dated )une 30, 2003 requesting 16 additional packets of
submittal material, and ownership information. With this ietter, I am submitting
the additional copies, including 16 full-sized sets of drawings. I am also attaching
ownership information.
As we discussed previously, this is a re-application for a partition that was approved
by the City in May of 200Q. The approval expired before the final plat was
submitted. The previous file number is MLP 1999-00018. (Note that the tax lot
number has changed. What was tax lot 1301 is now tax lot 1000).
The application materials being submitted are, for the most part, copies of the 2000
application, with one addition. Clean Water Services asked for a natural resource
assessment of the current condition of the wetland buffer area. We have completed
that assessment, which is attached as an exhibit to the application, and submitted
it to Clean Water Services for review. We should be able to provide a service
provider letter from Clean Water 5ervices soon.
Please feel free to call me if you have any questions or need additional information.
Thank-you Matt.
Sin rely,
Ed Murphy, AI P
cc: Dan Boyden
9�75 SW M2�rdock St. Tigard, Oregon 972z4
/Phone 503. 6zg.q6zs /Cellular So3. 3i4.o677 /Fax So3. g68.�674
C � ' �
C
0
� GEOGIIAPMIC INFORMATION SVSTEN
�
0
° AREA NOTIFIED
0
�---- - � (500')
p O
1RYe�S�w . . �
��� O
sus�7n O
� xtnu�re� °
_ t�mwam
0
cusT sT FOR: Ed Murphy
� �
�
,� , :�..,,� s,m„�,,, �" �
.,�� ° . RE: 1 S135AA, 1000
,�., o =__________
.,�, .�,,.� � �
n.. ,,, „�,�
saau,� J
� � h.t<:,i ;;'r'+. v��illA1M6 m ..
■nw�i � w
MAPLELEAF ST �° ��,Q
��� Y;� � W.w; �,� .._--,----�j "�-�
saawwi xuswrw
Q "`�, ' Property owner informatlon
•�w7 is valld for 3 months from
\� ,,,�,„„„ - the date printed on this map.
�
srur�erMr
a � T � I
� i
Isi1MWi717 ft7W �v��pp � 7t76W7W .
__'_ — — T
..L.
�suo aus��om� � I
susw�ni saawwa I��
ue,w o � �--�
(1O, �° J
�m. �^ .,�,� Q
-- - •us�wuu J , �wawunw cur�u�n� _ .
nsuem
A� simua�r� �+
,x�,:-:�-<:- �www� svduam �7T
OA
ms�eeuoe �mwoae� ancn�
us�w �
N
0 100 200 300 400 Fset
PINE ST �"=280teet
. ETi3ACINN
tULlp/7M
City of Tigard
� Infamalion on lhis map ie for penerW loeation only and
�hould be varified with th�Davalapmenl Ssrvieea Division.
13125 SW Hall Blvd
Tpsrd,OR 97223
(503)639-4771
ht�J/wwa.G.tip�rd.w.us
��..,m,,..;�y naVe��nmv.,t °bt�'�te�""ay'3,?^�3:r'•rm^„ic�r.qGirpg npR
�::. . ... .�Y:}_e�4'... .. . . . '�r�_�,,,�,,,5,_.
Fineview Farm 2-Lot Partition
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Applicant's Statement
Exhibits
Exhibit `A' Technical Memorandum from Fishman Environmental Services assessing
vegetated corridor condition, dated July 23,2003
Exhibit `B' Fineview Farm Tree Protection and Removal Plan, dated June 26,2001
Exhibit `C' Letter from USA, dated May 15, 2000
E�ibit `D' Letter from DSL, dated March 7,2000
Exhibit `E' Wetland Determination and Delineation for the SW Jefferson Street
Property, dated April 2, 1998.
Exhibit `F' Set of 2-lot partition plan drawings
Sheet 1 of 5- Cover/Index of Drawings
Sheet 2 of 5- Preliminary Plat
Sheet 3 of 5- Contour Map
Sheet 4 of 5- Preliminary Utility Plan
Sheet 5 of 5- On-site/Off-site Analysis
Sheet 1 of 1 -Tree Preservation Plan
(� Design
��V`Grou
P
Inc. April 21, 2000
APPLICANT'S STATEMENT
APPLICANT'S
PLANNERS 1tEPItESENTATIVE: LDC Design Group, Inc.
ENGINEERS APPLICANT/O�VNER: Fineview Farm L.L.C.
15500 SW Jay Street
Beaverton, OR 97006
SURVEYORS
REQUEST: 2-Lot Partition
SIZE: Tax Lot 1301, 1.20 Acres
LOCATION: East of SW 90`�Avenue, 330 Feet
HILLSBORO South of SW Locust Street
(CORPORATE OFFICE)
3300 NW?��TH TERRACE LAND USE DISTRICT: R-4.5 (Low Density Residential
HILLSBORO, OR 97124
503.858.4242 DiStriCt�
Fax: 503.645.5500
www.ldcdesign.com
SALEM I• APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
3400 STATE STREET
SUITE G-��O A. Tigard Community Development Code:
SALEM, OR 97301
503.370.8424 Chapter 18.390: Decision-Making Procedures
Fax: 503.370.8426 Chapter 18.420: Land Partitions
Idcs�ldcdesign.com Chapter 18.510: Residential Zoning Districts
Chapter 18.705: Access,Egress and Circulation
VANCOUVER Chapter 18.715: Density Computations
8s�3 rvE H.�E�oE��a�E. Chapter 18.725: Environmental Performance
su�TE 202 Standards
VANCOUVER,WA 98665 Chapter 18.745: Landscaping and Screening
360.573.0370 Chapter 18.775: Sensitive Lands Review
To��FRee: 503.241.8657 Chapter 18.790: Tree Removal
Fnx: 360.573.0390
Idcv�idcdesign.com Chapter 18.795: Visual Clearanee Areas
Chapter 18.797: Water Resource(WR)Overlay
KLEIN CONSULTING Dish-ict
ENGINEERS, INC. Chapter 18.810: Street&Utility Improvement
� 3300 NW Z11TH TERRACE Standards
HILLSBORO, OR 97124
503.858.4242
Fnx: 503.645.5500
kce�idcdesign.com 1
MECKEL ENGINEERING
& SURVEYING, INC. \U.DCHFSI�PROJECTS�Projects\7009\DOCS1Fteporulpart-2.doc
COEUR D�ALENE, IDAHO
www.meckel.com
II. INTRODUCTION
The applicant is requesring approval of a 2-lot partition as shown on the attached development plans.
The site is located east of SW 90`h Avenue, 225 feet of SW Locust Street. The site slopes gradually to
the southeast. Uses to the north,east and south are zoned R-4.5 and are similar in use. Metzger
Elementary School lies to the west of the site across SW 90`h Avenue. The common accessway shown on
the attached plans will be constructed after the partition has recorded and prior to the issuance of
building permits.
III. FINDINGS
A. CITY OF TIGARD COMPREHE1vSIVE PLAN:
COMMENT:
Except where required by the Community Development Code, this application is not required to address
goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as it relates to development of the subject property, since
the Plan is implemented by the Code. The subject property is situated within Washington County's
Metzger-Progress Community Plan. However,there are no general or specific design elements on the
Community Plan that are applicable to the requested partition. According to the Metzger-Progress
Significant Natural Resources Map,the subject property is not designated as containing any significant
natural resources. However, there is a wetland located on the site as shown on the attached site plan
(Exhibit 1).
B. TIGARD COMMUN-ITY DEVELOPMENT CODE: •
CHAPTER 18.390: DECISION-MAHING PROCEDURES
18.390.040: Type II Procedure
A. Preapplication Conference. A preapplication conference is required for Type II
actions. Preapplication conference requirements and procedures are set forth in
section 18.390.080C.
B. Application requirements.
1. Application Forms. Type II applications shall be made on forms provided
by the Director as provided by Section 18.390.080 E1;
2. Submittal Information. The application shall:
a. Include the information requested on the application form;
b. Address the relevant criteria in sufficient detail for review and
action;
c. Be accompanied by the required fee;
2
P:�Proj ects\7009\D0051Reports�part-1.doc
d. Include two sets of pre-stamped and pre-addressed envelopes for all
property owners of the record as specified in Section 18.390.040C.
The records of the Washington County Department of Assessment
and Taxation are the official records for determining ownership.
The applicant shall demonstrate that the most current assessment
records have been used to produce the notice list;
e. Include an impact study. The impact study shall quantify the effect
address, at a minimum,the transportation system,including
bikeways,the drainage system,the parks system,the water system
the sewer system, and the noise impacts of the development. For
each public facility system and type of impact,the study shall
propose improvements necessary to meet City standards and to
minimize the impact of the development on the public at large,
public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In
situations where the Community Development Code requires the
dedication of real property interests,the applicant shall eitber
specifically concur with the dedication requirements,or provide
evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property
dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected
impacts of the development.
COMMENT:
According to Table 18.390.1 a Land Partition is a Type II Procedure. As a result,this application is
submitted under the Type II procedure. The applicable forms have been completed and the appropriate
fee has been paid to the City of Tigard.
CHAPTER 18.420: LAND PARTITIONS
� 18.420.040: Application Submission Requirements
A. General submission requirements. All applications shall be made on forms
provided by the Director and shall include information required for a Type II
application,as governed by Chapter 18.390.
1. The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance
requirements and regulations;
2. There are adequate public facilities available to serve the proposal;
3. All proposed improvements meet City and applicable agency standards;
and
4. All proposed lots conform to the specific requirements below:
3
P:1Projects\7009\DOCS�Reports�part-l.dce
a. The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot
requirement of the applicable zoning district.
' b. The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district.
In the case of a flag lot, the accessway may not be included in the lot
area calculation.
c. Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public
•b
15-foot wide access easement.
d. Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district.
e. When the partitioned lot is a tlag lot,the developer may determine
the location of the front yard,provided that no side yard is less than
10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to maximize
separation from existing structures.
f. A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record
� where the paved drive in an accessway is located within ten feet of
an abutting Iot in accordance with Sections 18.745.040. Screening
may also be r,�quired to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to
provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed development. ,
g. The t`ire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where
the length of an accessway would have a detrimental effect on fire-
fighting capabilities.
h. Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one lot,
a reciprocal easement which will ensure access and maintenance
rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map.
COMMENT:
A City of Tigard Type II partition application form is submitted with this request. The proposed
partition complies with the abave criteria and the standards of the R-4.5 District as shown on the attached
development plans.
B. Specific submission requirements. All applications shall include the preliminary lot
line map and necessary information iu graphic andlor written form. The Director
shall provide the applicant with detailed information about these submission
requirements.
COMMENT:
The Applicant's Statement, in conjunction with the attached development plans (Exhibit 1),meets the
submission requirements detailed by the Director and the Tigard Community Code.
4
P:�Proj ect�\7009�DOCS�Reports�part-I.doc
CHAPTER 18.510: ItESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
TABLE 18.510.2
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES
STANDARD R-1 R-2 R-3.5 R-4.5 R-7
Minimum Lot Size
.ft. 5 000 s .ft.
-Duplexes 10,000 sq.ft. 10,000 sq.ft.
-Attached unit I 5 000 s .ft.
Average Minimum Lot Width
-Detached unit lots l00 ft. 100 ft. 65 ft. 50 ft. 50 R.
-Duplex lots 90 ft. 90 ft. 50 ft.
-Attached unit lots 40 ft.
Maximum Lot Covera e - - - - 80% 2
Minimum Setbacks
-Front yard 30 R. 30 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. 15 ft.
-Side facing street on
comer&through lots 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. l5 ft. 10 ft.
-Side yard 5 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft.
-Rear yard 25 ft. 25 ft. 15 ft. 15 ft. I S ft.
-Side or rear yard abutting more
restrictive zoning district 30 ft.
-Distance between praperty line
and front of ara e 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft.
Maximum Hei ht 30 tt. 30 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft. 35 ft.
Minimum Landsca e Re uirement - - - - Z�%
[1]Single-family attached residential units permitted at one dwelling per lot with no more that five attached units in one grouping.
[2)Lot coverage includes all buildings and impervious surfaces.
C���:
The proposed lots will comply with the dimensional and setback standards of the R-4.5 District as shown
on the attached development plans (Exhibit 1).
CHAPTER 18.705: ACCESS,EGRESS,AND CIRCULATION
18.705.020 Applicability of Provisions
A. When provisions apply. The provisions of this chapter shall�pply to all development
including the construction of new structures,the remodeling of existing structures (see
Section 18.360.050), and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading
requirements which changes the access requirements.
COMII�NT:
The proposed project will comply with the standards of Chapter 18.705, Access,Egress and Circulation
as illustrated by the attached plans.
5
P:�Projects17009�DOCSReportslpart-l.doc
18.705.030 General Provisions
C. Joint access. Owners of two or more uses, structures,or parcels of land may agree
to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of
both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as
designated in this title,provided:
1. Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds,
> >
2. Copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent
file with tlie City.
COMMENT:
The proposed lots will have joint access as shown on the attached development plans (Exhibit 1). Copies
of the deeds granting access to individual owners will be submitted and filed with the City upon plat
recording.
H. Minimum access requirements for residential use.
1. Vehicular access and egress for single-family,duplex or attached single-
family dwelling units on individual lots and multi-family residential uses
shall not be less than 19 as provided in Table 18.705.1 and Table 18.705.2;
TABLE 18.705.1
VEHICULAR ACCESS/EGRESS REQiTIREMENTS:
RESIDENTIAL USE 6 OR FEWER UNYTS
Number Dwelling Minimum Number of Minimum Access Minimum Pavement
Unit/Lots Driveways Required Width Width
1 or 2 1 15' 10'
3-6 1 20' 20'
COMMENT:
The proposed access will comply with the above standard as illustrated on the attached plans.
3. Private residential access drives shall be provided and maintained in
accordance with the provisions of the Uniform Fire Code; �
4. Access drives in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with approved
provisions for the turning around of fire apparatus by one of the following:
a. A circular,paved surface having a minimum turn radius measured
from center point to outside edge of 35 feet;
b. A hammerhead-configured,paved surface with each leg of the
6
P:1ProjectsV009�DOCSReports�part-1.doc
hammerhead having a minimum depth of 40 feet and a minimum
width of 20 feet;
c. The maximum cross slope of a required turnaround is 5%.
COMMENT:
The proposed access will comply with the provisions of the Uniform Fire Code as illustrated by the
CI3APTER 18.715: DENSITY COMPUTATIONS
A. Definition of net development area. Net development area, in acres, shall be
determined by subtracting the following land area(s) from the gross acres,which is
all of the land included in the legal description of the property to be developed:
B. Calculating the maximum number of residential units. To calculate the maximum
number of residential units per acre, divide the number of square feet in the net
acres by the minimum number of square feet required for each lot in the applicable
zoning district.
C. Calculating the minimum number of residential units. As required by Section
18.510.040,the minimum number of residential units per net acre shall be
calculated by multi�lying the maximum number of units determined in Subsection
B above by 80% (0.8).
COD�NT:
The net development area of Tax Lot 1000 is 17,778 square feet. The maximum number of residential
units on the property is 2.3 (17,778/7,500=2.3). This application is for a 2-lot partition. As a result,this
application complies with the maximum and minimum density requirements of the R-4.5 District.
CHAPTER 18.725: ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
18.725.020 General Provisions .
A. Compliance with applicable state and federal regulations. In addition to the
regulations adopted in this chapter, each use,activity,or operation within the City
of Tigard shall comply with the applicable state and federal standards pertaining to
noise,odor and discharge of matter into the atmosphere,ground, sewer system or
stream. Regulations adopted by the State Environmental Quality Commission
pertaining to non-point source pollution control and contained in the Oregon
Administrative Rules shall by this reference be made a part of this chapter.
7
P:�Projecu\7009�DOCS1Reports�part-l.doc
18.725.030: Performance Standards
COMMENT:
The proposed partition will comply with environmental performance standards of residential
development.
18.745.040 Street Trees
A. Protection of existing vegetation. All development projects fronting on a public
street, private street or a private driveway more than 100 feet in length approved
after the adoption of this title shall be required to plant street trees in accordance
with the standards in Section 18.745.040 C.
COMMENT:
Street trees shall be planted in accordance with Section 18.745.040 C.
18.745.050 Buffering and Screening
A. General Qrovisions.
2. Buffering and screening is requir.ed to reduce the impacts on adjacent uses
whicli are of a different type in accordance with the matrices in this chapter
(Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2). The owner of each proposed development is
responsible for the installation and effective maintenance of buffering and
screening. When different uses would be abutting one another except for
separation by a right-of-way,buffering,but not screening,shall be required
as specified in the matrix;
COMMENT:
T1ie subject site is sunounded by similar uses. As a result,no buffering or screening is required.
However,buffering and screening will be implemented on the south side of the proposed access as _
shown on the attached development plans(Exhibit 1) to reduce impacts on adjacent parcels to the south.
CHAPTER 18.775: SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW
COA'II�EVIENT:
No alterarion of the wetland is proposed as part of this application. As a result, a sensitive lands review
is not applicable to this application.
8
P:�Projcets17009\DOCS�Reports�part-l.doc
�
CHAPTER 18.790: TREE REMOVAL
COMMENT:
The attached plans include a n-ee inventory. Potential tree removal is identified in accordance with
Section 18.790.030.
18.790.050 Permit Applicability
A. Removal permit required. Tree removal permits shall be required only for the
removal of any tree which is located on or in a sensitive land area as defined by
Chapter 18.775. The permit for removal of a tree shall be processed as a Type I
procedure as governed by Section 18.390.030,using the following approval criteria:
COMMENT:
No trees within the wetland area are proposed to be removed as part of this application.
CI3APTER 18.795: VISUAL CLEARANCE AREAS
The proposed project complies with the visual clearance areas as shown on the attached development
plans.
CHAPTER 18.797: WATER RESOURCES (WR) OVERLAY DISTRICT
COMMENT:
The proposed site is not within a Water Resource Overlay District, therefore,this standard does not
apply.
CHAPTER 18.810: STREET AND UTILTIY STANDARDS
5. Access drives in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with approved
provisions for the turning around of fire apparatus by one of the following:
a. A circular, paved surface having a minimum turn radius measured
from center point to outside edge of 35 feet;
b. A hammerhead-configured,paved surface with each leg of the
hammerhead having a minimum depth of 40 feet and a minimum
width of 20 feet;
c. The maximum cross slope of a required turnaround is 5%.
9
P:�Projects\7009�DOCS�Reports\part-1.doc
LIST OF EX�IIBITS
Exhibit `A' Technical Memorandum from Fishman Environmental Services assessing
vegetated corridor condition, dated July 23, 2003
E�ibit `B' F"ineview Farm Tree Protection and Removal Plan,dated June 26, 2001
Exhibit `C' Letter from USA, dated May 15, 2000
Exhibit `D' Letter from DSL, dated March 7, 2000
Exhibit `E' Wetland Determination and Delineation for the SW Jefferson Street
Property,dated April 2, 1998.
Exhibit `F' Set of 2-lot partition plan drawings
Sheet 1 of 5- Cover/Index of Drawings
Sheet 2 of 5- Preliminary Plat
Sheet 3 of 5- Contour Map
Sheet 4 of 5- Preliminary Utility Plan
Sheet 5 of 5- On-site/Off-site Analysis
Sheet 1 of 1 -Tree Preservation Plan
Exhibit 'A'
Fishman Environmental Services, LLC
CONSUL7ANT5 IN ECOLOGY AND NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
VEGETATED CORRIDOR CONDITION�ASSESSMENT
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Date: July 23, 2003
To: Ed Murphy,Ed Murphy and Associates
From: Elizabeth A.French, Environmental Scientist
Subject: Vegetated Corridor Condition Assessment
STTE NAME: Fineview Partition
SITE LOCATION: East of SW 90�'Avenue and south of SW Locust Street in Tigard, Oregon
T1 S,Rl W, Section 35,taac map/lots 1 S 135AA/901 and 1000
Latitude/Longitude: 45° 26'45"North/ 122°46'02"West
OWNER: Dan Boyden
APPL�CANT: Ed Murphy, Ed Murphy&Associates
DATE OF SITE VISIT: July 9, 2003
PROJECT STAFF: Stacy N. Benjamin,Wetland Ecologist
Elizabeth A.French, Environmental Scientist
FES PROJECT: 0306b
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Fishman Environtnental Services,LLC(FES),at the request of Ed Murphy and on the behalf of the
property owner, Dan Boyden, conducted a vegetated corridor condition assessment in the
southeastern portion of the approximately 1.6 acre site on July 9,2003. A wetland delineation was
performed in 1997 on the subject property by SRUShapiro,and the Oregon Division of State Lands
concurred with the report, dated Apri12, 1998,on March 7, 2000 (DET#99-0493, Attachment A).
The site is located just east of SW 90`t'Avenue and south of SW Locust St in Tigazd,Oregon(Figure
1).
The project site is surrounded by residential development,with an abandoned railroad right-of-way
along the southeastern property boundary. S W 90"'Avenue borders a portion of the western property
boundary,and a gravel parking area is located in the northwestern portion of the site,adjacent to SW
90`�Ave. The site is relatively flat, with several large trees along the edges of the property. Site
topography is gently sloping to the east, and elevations range from approximately 184 to 195 feet
above sea level (site topographic survey, Figure 2).
0
0
Fishman Environmental Services,LLC Project 03066 0 _
o �
° � ���
�� :�
434 NW Sixth Avenue, 5uim 304 Portlend OR y7209-i600 phune:503 224 0333 fax:503 224 1851 www_lishenserc.c��m
Fineview Partition
Vegetated Corridor Condition Assessment
' July 23, 2003
METHODOLOGY
The condition of the vegetated corridor was assessed on July 9, 2003 at 3 sample plot locations. The
vegetated corridor sample plot locations and the vegetated corridor setbacks are shown in Figure 2.
The vegetated corridor condition assessment data sheets are included in Attachment B. The condition
of the vegetated corridor was determined according to Clean Water Services' vegetated corridor
standards (Table 3.2,Attachment B), and is based upon the percent tree canopy and percent cover of
native trees, shrubs and groundcover versus invasive, non-native or noxious weeds.
Site photographs are available by request.
Plant taxonomy follows Hitchcock and Cronquist (1973) and synonymy follows Reed (1988);
synonymy is shown in [single square brackets]. Taxonomy of some species has been updated
(Kartesz 1994) and the new nomenclature is shown in [[double square bracketsJ].
Other materials used in this study are included in the Reference section.
SITE CONDITIONS
'The approximately 1.6 acre property gently slopes to the east, and is mostly undeveloped, with a
small gravel pazking area is located adjacent to SW 90`h Avenue. The western half of the property
is an open field with a few scattered trees. An approximately 0.26 acre wetland dominated by
Nootka rose (Rosa nutkana, FAC), Douglas' spirea (Spiraea douglasii, FACV� and Himalayan
blackberry (Rubus discolor, FACU) was delineated in the eastern portion of the site in 1997 by
SRUShapiro. The wetland is bordered on the west by a thicket of Himalayan blackberry, beaked
hazelnut(Corylus cornuta,FACU)and black hawthorn(Crataegus douglasii,FAC),making access
to the wetland very difficult. As wetland boundary flags no longer existed on the project site, the
location of the wetland boundary was estimated based on a change of vegetation from a mixture of
hydrophytic and non-hydrophytic species to predominantly non-hydrophytic species. Hydrophytic
species noted in the west portion of the wetland included Nootka rose, thick-headed sedge(Carez
pachystachya, FAC), dense sedge (Carex densa, OBL), soft rush (Juncus effusus, FACV� and
Oregon ash(Frc�acinus latifolia, FACV�.
Vegetated Corridor Condition Assessment
We understand that Clean Water Services will require a 25 foot vegetated corridor along the west
and north wetland boundary adjacent to the proposed partition in the southeast portion of the
property. The vegetated corridor to the west of the delineated wetland was evaluated at two sample
plots and was evaluated at one sample plot at the north end of the wetland. Plot A was located in the
southern portion of the property,just north of tax lot 1100 and west of the wetland. Vegetation was
dominated by Himalayan blackberry, beaked hazelnut, tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea, FAC-),
Fishman Environmental Services,LLC Project 03066 Page 2
Fineview Partition
Vegetated Corridor Condition Assessment
July 23, 2003
bluegrass (Poa species, -) and Pacific blackberry (Rubus ursinus, FACiJ). A trace amount of
common velvetgrass(Holcus lanatus,FAC)was also present. The wetland boundary location was
estimated based on a change in vegetation and topography, with the elevation sloping down more
steeply to the east toward the wetland. Himalayan blackberry extended further west of the wetland
to the north of Plot A. The mixed shrub and grass community constitutes approximately 50 percent
of the vegetated corridor.
Plot B,a gassy field community,was located north of Plot A. The location of the wetland boundary
was estimated based on the dropping out of dense sedge,Oregon ash and soft rush(Juncus ef.fusus,
FACV�, and the transition from bluegrass to tall fescue, as no wetland boundary flags remained.
Vegetation at Plot B was dominated by tall fescue and common velvetgrass, and community 2
accounts for approximately 40%of the vegetated corridor.
Plot C was located at the northeastern corner of the property just west of SW Maple Court. 'The
forested community was dominated by Oregon ash, Himalayan blackberry, bentgrass (Agrostis
species, -) and Pacific blackberry, with smaller amounts of bittersweet nightshade (Solanum
dulcamara, FAC+),black hawthorn(Crataegus douglasii, FAC) and snowberry(Symphoricarpos
albus, FACU). The vegetated corridor to the west of Plot C is dominated by Himalayan blackberry
with scattered shrubs and no ash trees.
The eastern buffer was not assessed since no development is proposed adjacent to the east wetland
boundary and lack of access due to blackberry. The abandoned railroad right-of-way could not be
accessed due to a locked gate.
We understand that CWS has approved the placement of an approximately 225 square foot riprap
pad for stormwater discharge to the wetland. The riprap will be placed in the vegetated corridor,and
will not impact the wetland. No other impacts are proposed to the vegetated corridor on the site.
Clean Water Services requires that vegetated corridors deternuned to be in degraded or marginal
condition be enhanced to a good condition as part of any site development. We recommend removal
of Himalayan blackberry and bittersweet nightshade, seeding with a native grass mix and planting
native trees and shrubs. An enhancement plan was previously prepared by LDC Design Group for
the approximately 5,940 square foot wetland buffer located in the southeast portion of the property,
to the west of the wetland and abandoned rail-road right-of-way(Attachment C).
CONCLUSION
The 25-foot vegetated corridor surrounding the approximately 0.26(11,200 square foot)wetland was
determined to be in degraded condition due to the presence of invasive species including Himalayan
blackberry and bittersweet nightshade, and the low occurrence of native species and a tree canopy
Fishman Environmental Services,LLC Project 03066 Page 3
Fineview Partition
Vegetated Comdor Condition Assessment
July 23, 2003
in most of the vegetated corridor. The vegetated comdor boundary was determined based on changes
in vegetation from wetland species to upland species and topography.
LIST OF PREPARERS
Stacy N. Benjamin, Wetland Ecologist, sbenjamin@fishenserv.com
Field Work, Report Review
Elizabeth A. French, Environmental Scientist, efrench@fishenserv.com
Field Work, Report Preparation
REFERENCES
Hitchcock,C.L. and A. Cronquist, 1973.Flora of the Pacific Northwest.University of Washington
Press, Seattle.
Kartesz, J.T.,1994.A Synonymized Checklist of the Vascular Flora of the United States, Canada,
and Greenland. Volume 1-Checklist and Yolume 2-Thesaurus.Second Edition.In association
with Biota of North American Program of the North Carolina Botanical Garden. Timber
Press, Portland.
SRUShapiro/AGCO,Inc. 1998. Wetland Determination and Delineation for the SWJefferson Street
Property in Tigard, Oregon.
USGS, 1961,photorevised 1984. Beaverton, Oregon 7.5'topographic quadrangle.
Fishman Environmental Services,LLC Project 03066 Page 4
N C/] �
8� .
W
r�y..
0�0 p�
� � , 1
��-1 � U � :-c . ••- . -�, .�. S , i S�'r 95TH��'., � AV, 12o Q�,* � �c ' f�J 4 P : .
CJ' �
!�o ����� m . � ,�� ,�o � � ,y .�,. ��e �I��� �,�5w sa�[9�n���'� gsm AJ .� ; R � N "� °� R�`'.:' �.
� nr�< � �1� '�' �'� '% -� ���'� nT��,, ,=' h ' �. g�€�-- v2°° �
� �,Y�S3� @� � �,�1��� �!G ('•.• ,�,��` `�' � '�SW 92ND � .> ,`-�y�� �;,° ���co�tt` '1VD = Av c��6
(� �Y SM -�m �'.� � �1S `� � . 1r�Q.� 511�91St � A�-���+ � Y�7'��'�,y},-Sr
G 9 AY ri � . �i � 1 �.... � � V+ � Ay A� .�F''91ST~ �v��, J� _.`� rc�'$T � � 0 m �o E �o �
¢ (� ��t8��� m , � In: ` s�l . �� �? � �� 1,ti . W 90TN" AV tt� I/ . : {� $ 9,,_pTH�;-�'I �91�St� $91i"f AV g n �n r,v
'C7 �.••yy � �1 � � � ♦ �° 11600 1120Q SN f $.' , �
O m �laeTM . ' � . . . -- . r •,.�n . <5a: 0° ���� p
7g o p a
�p� � ? .�G F?� „�� •W `� � ' '��,5/y ;`F��i. 1 ': .� ♦(� -�'j� �-� . f I v� q5�p�Ob �w 7sa� €
Q . s '-0 ..G .� C. � SW .'. . ;.a ■'.� ,�,�'.. 9G o'��' . `�.�.�� - - �'v: `�{ .,I �A' �� � � b m �SV+ eBTM A '"
G. S��w �v �,a p'�-�p..��.138U0 �.� �I3Q0 . �.'l����s�`��'�,BLV�V��vW�� ��. F13� .. �-. �I1��I ���sv1RwSx1� �pt
y
��° am+�� �F �s�b o�. 12o y-� ,�1�,5 , �� , 'k'-"'S�� �_85TH � r �� �4
. � �,�,.• ns. � p��, �.� r y,/ � . A o. .�a '�'� �,{ ....:�� . � I O ��sv wrrp�r� �
� Q� a ip 5 d�a ON,r��k •��5 ';b SW 'g�RIS A� _ `�' _ �.y„ '�!F
� ��) J v�' .'�� .:;� N�0 . .� SW 821JR (�4V:' SM � 82 �� _ \ � �
g ,�„ " $i' - �' � :iT- �',.I �� � O�, �= AV N
g c �,� ' c .' � '4R .9 m W8152'� � �,s
�� �,..�°° �� s- � ���� �:�`a t sr � �✓',fi �sw 79n+�Av ' sw 8on+ �'Ay � �$_ � � ,
��? ��`��0+ 5 SW�In{ ' � S M 78rtH AV � g � � m �� 92D0�
C CJ�, .�;,�:v� SW CHERR. ' pR P� . �,`� v, 1�3 a : > . � SW ' 77TH p py y� �..
I V�.�('Nd"� h1 .��� ... 1Q., � � . �. , ..-i S�'.
�n D / ),'> `��py' -..'r�. �i ; •SW 761N AV �r M$ T.- 67H FAL m � a ^ �y ^i a� sw �Arn+ �
O� ��� _..Y � � �:He ti.�c� �._. �3�. ,3C'.;� ` � `.' i ,fT' � r,r� Skc?iia�fi�P�a,°i � �i
C� A�' � 74tH � � ��znn :'�� '��"c N?4'CH SW m 75TH� AV �, , � `rl��� V1:p
�Z . K:AV �-_'.r,a�i yl � � ry ;,$ v. �p � $ �n 'n � ._ *„1:.
m m a� CrJ '�9 �:�� � SW . � 72ND s� a a��w '4 , -, � � .sw .�at�M �� :���s.
C) CD Gt y � � 13700 �13300 � o �: /�V.. �..> � - SW �72Na I AV �+f -.. �A OO v�;...51f T3B� 515
�oeoo
�gj �� `' � �� AV � �� s�' � � ie � � m� . o00� � iizoo�f � � :t��� 1 �_- :�.� srr.for ° P _
�-� y � „��, ). la0oo, . .:� �� SW$ � TOTN $ �. ' '� 4q�'4�.. ,SW 7SS1� �f�, ;���it rt r�',.i �' El�� `��'���
m . A4 rv3 AU � �Mn �r� Ya� ��.
m Z r., � '` � � ' SW :`� 69TH'i� AV < s .�1 . % : �� , :w� �� o �. ;7.cpHS ns':,
�0 l""� b � TN '� PKWY , � "-„", , w 685'�i�;CT r. �`��2 �d';W�oC°s
� �. �� � � �c . 120 � 6)TN AK'' H1B9 KS ;✓�f.�� ES�� � ' �I�•�\ 69TH�AV
Cil � SYl ���. 66TH = AV � �. N Al�a � ��qv�y -�� G i ; , �� ��' �`,�:!�!
M� . "'� � �,) . ,� '.H`V�- 66�_AVs _�^S'� ,L �.+ �+tiL`'}-l�t�
� _ — .. . _ W, .
..i : $W �T p • ��'.��.�. ��s r-�r.."ay4,�}�e�h�PV .
� � ��A�' �� �� �_SW 63RD � �AV 12800 sv p�TM�r �E FSW�k��.� sain�v Sw. '= 641H A4�`� f•R�� r ,�""£ a .a"
�k �i � m SW 630.D � PL � ND a�S eV �� �'a SM' 63RD nY � q�n5` � � W t p '
r-+ � � � I b� SW 62ND qy $ �Iv � '� SW 62ND AV - S �° � ^' ��I
O � �� �� r\�� I O d b 3 LN SW 615T AV 6 1 8 z � �I?��y S W 6 1 5 7 AV n�° Q 9
�y � � y I � , ry C+' 60TN AV l � � � `� SN 601H A �� ��S S� �
`"� F� F� I� f a ' � C � - .. .._ ' R RD con�
� h� � � � 00 - s���r'�
`"�+ C!� � � �I D ` � iri �� a �ROGERS RD K ar 1 •' „�'; NSQ, � �SN SBTH r •��rt: uy64�` si�sstw ar
8 y �''{ `�j � lD�ry� `-- �.• ` M� � MrpotM� C$ R�� � .;;,. � ', U te� S'f, �.� _ v `� a 5�+>p :
L� - ` _'a� ¢ 7MMtto � Rr y �a q > i��l.: z � $SM
v m , SW MKJ �+ $$E�}I � ` Yl �AI 11T1 AY
W �j � �C � 1 Gr �,f(`'� `} FO$B G � �R t °'F ��a P�8"�S2 � `�G �$ SW 57r AY p ,�qr �w ecn��r
�l,'1 v� ('� ..^' .`^ „�„ � @
�p i IoIKE Cr�nnctK p� �,+ pg � k� �"�'"' �v 5W ��SSTH AV m
b � O � o \ I � a� � �Q X14�$�fA N��(If"i � ! h' �... � � �'dS� � � � '�p N <
I Q 8 � a m cr s t� � : �,��, ,; � � �� �o��Y G'P IE O SW � 53R0 AV
� � � '� , p . N $ KIHGS� .. a' ,,�` � 7a-: aC`" � ' � o� 10300 �
� � � � 1 __ • a ; � � ,(�� ` " � �� � r I �p SW �52ND AV��
t
�.. ~ -- ^ � � � � 9p a � i �i ;'';;; � = �r -�i � � �si��� hv BLYD � wm�r ��b°
� O�.,.�1 Z p - I � L 1 3 a�u R I :'��+� �`/�'I�Mt�� '$ _:�,,.s<�_�d�.�.vw,.i.,.w.,� I ��'I� _ ..
O r �
O� �
�
' — - - - - - -
��►.���3r Ms `. �� �� - �,,\ , - - - - - - - - - - - -
T--------r---------�� � \ � �.,\ � �
� , � �� 1 ( .� i � o
� � } `\�y( �- "�"` \ `\`\`I ._......---_...�....___�.......---_.......---• $ F., a � � 'd
� i i �"\� �. ) �� -f6. ��--- � �1 o a� � 'o^
! �___......-----.....�-----; `� ;;�� 1 ��� � �`, � � � �� �
i � i � /!`" I xS' y� \�� � � � �
i ! � � � �,,...-ti....ti . , • �
. �
� � o � � � . �1 �;`��' , ' , '��. ''� '�y ;��� a v � � � M
I I � � i �. 'I ��`�r%'�'c+t4, • � : � �, �����d. ; ��� O � � a � � A g
' ' f ' '� 1{ .� ` l ,4 . . �� p � . •r� � o �
.;.....---........ ' _�.....---_.»..._L---7 �\ 1 .�_'��;.w.:;: �:.1. 'Y�'.--_ \\ 6-� `��".---�».....---r......�--- � � � � �
' � � � ' � '► � + ��� • ' • � +'�•� � �`\v�� \�� � 'r�. � p � rWh� �
j }.......__.�..........»���..1 � � � f ► f • 1 ♦ 'i�., ( � �6' � F�I � Q Q V
� � 1 � � I ��� ♦ �� ♦ • � ��. \ � \ ��� � �\ a �
'. s �\• ♦ �� ►'�,, �� � � U � N
1 i � � � � .. 1 �.,. . . . , .\ . ., � � � 0� `� F'' � �
i 1 f � � ,� �•.�s �� • • f '\ 1\� �
. '.
. L-_.»... ...__-...._. • .
; ; � .._.---; � ` . ���..����•..,.�, a;�..;� —� `. �. ���qZ �,,, �
. . . . .
. i ; � r� . .�� `. . . . .} l `.o, � 6" �, fi,
i ; � O i � ••.,,� � .� . � .�\. !� � •.� �� �`
O i i . 1 1, �- �
� � i i � � i�� \` '•.�a�+�• i�'i�•�, ` � 1� r�\\� `�� C a Z�
,...1....a,--.......�---- .;...---�......_.----.� � ��..---�. ...._,._ ..�...`� ..k, , �. ._ �+' �.�. Q °' � <W
~ ; � \ �\ � \\ � ��•.� •\• �•�\ ...L•��� � � `° � � �"
� 1 � � \ `4 t ♦1� ♦ j''�, .it' f f y f � � ',� y �
\ • V � • �1�•► � ♦ / � ♦ y � �
,.-_.... .£.......__........._ ` K�- --..� ---�......._ .�s,���S��.. ! � LL W C/� WcW.>
; �
� � 1 � � \ rU`' �r,\1� I � +`� �O
_.�_.......... __ ..�_.....�.»__� � � _.Q_ .......-�- -�•-�0 �....�. � ..._.---.........r---�. �...__r� ��'i z�
� ... . •
......�...... ..�_ .. .. , "I . �;. � . F ui
i I I �
� j � � \ �\� � � \ � ! �.� �'�`+ � f i I �� `�y� j�
+ E ; \��, 1.,1� �\ i � �\ �I ! `� i i � �\` OO \ p� Oj
1 �
1 �` Q
� t S \�`� � �� 1 7 \�. N\ Y \� ♦ 1 j O I Qa Z
� ♦�
� � �A I .....� � \ � _�...»�. �\ I � O I
� � x .._.__ ... _ . ......_ �, � • ; i � �
; f � i..� ..s�! �. ..��` ry.1� I � I V i \ 1 ' i �--
' i '� � t
i ` � ; � � o \ � i�'� •"•� il � a - �' \1 t . i ; � i
� ..�....___.7._.._� '`,�� � � �, . .� � \ � � � � � , �
i r• \ � � . � � � � _L_........---!_.....i.---_.l.....___ �
......._ � ....----• ,
,._i_�. __-y...... f.,t�. 1 1 ..` �.. � I I � � i ; i
LC�1 � ', l � ' I � � � � N
.._J__I I �
i � i �^ ���'....` v ,�„} �\ � � 'j 1� I ` i � ' � i � o
I � � �
i i i ��� /�(_. , 1 ` \ �� ; I �� ; � ; � �
� � •`i � li l I 'y �-- i j N + ,Q,
� ; �_ � __.. .� � ' � �--�.._. __......�. � ., � � � ° ; ' o � �
s t N � r�_.........�_ ,� ..,.. .y �'- , � o � E t : .- E � � i o
� 1 �
i i � i / �� °� � i� ° \�`�� I �° \i i � i ; � i
i � � i /� . �,', � �` � � � �r � 1 �i � � � � i i i � i �;
: � �� ��� �/'i i � � 1 I � � � � � � ; �
� � i \ � i�! I� � i � � � � � ' t °
� _�1_ --'---�---------- �
ATTACHMENT A:
OREGON DIVISION OF STATE LANDS
WETLAND DELINEATION CONCURRENCE LETTER
Fishman Environmental Services,LLC Project 03066
Jun 18 p3 10: 07a M� '�y 5� �81674 p, g
°- Division of State Lands
.,- � s.
,�� � , 1 � Vl 1
:�.;, �;�:.•: � 775 Summer Street NE
Salem,OR 97301-1�79
John A.Kitzhaber,M.O.,Govemor (503)378-3805
FAX(5d3)37$-4844
'1'I"�'(5C}3)�78-4615
AECE�V�p P�A�NING
March 7, ��}�� State Land Board
�iAR0 � +ZOOO John A.Kitxhaber
Goverrtar
(`,��QF TIGARQ Bill$radbury
� Mr. Ph�lip Morford s�ret1Ty�f scar�
17582 Cardinai Drive Ilm H;tl
Lake Oswego, �regon 97034 St�te Treasurer
. Re: Wetiand Delineatlon for Jefferson Street property tocated in
T9S� R1W, 5e+�t;r�n 35 in Tigard, O�regon. Det#99-Q�493
Dear Mr. Mortord:
{ have reviewed the wetland delineation report for the above-referenced site. Based an
data sut�mit�ed by Colin Maclaren of Shapiro and Associ�tes along with his site visit this
month verffying co�ditions, i concur with the canclusions, The wetlar+d areas mapped
in Figure 4 of the report are subject to the permit �equirements af the state Removal-Fili
Law (ORS 196.800-196.990). A state permit is required �'or fi11 or excavation of 54 cubic
yards or more in the wettand area. This concurren�e is for purposes afi the s�ata Welf.
Removal-Fiil Law anlY; fecferai or locat wet4and permit requi�ements may app y
The Arn�y Corps of Engineers will review tha report and m�ke a determinatiqn for
purposes af Section 40�4 of the Clean Water Act at the time that a perm�fi application is
submitted. We recommend that you attach a capy of this concurr�:nce fetter to any
subsequent DSL and Corps permit a�plicatfans to speed applicatian raview.
Piease be aware that state (aw estabtishes a preference for avoidance of wetland
impacts. Because measures to avoid and minimixe wetiand impacts may include
reconfiguring parce4 layout and size or development design, we recammend fihat you
work with Bifl Parks, the 17ivision Resource Coordinato�far#his area (378-3$05, ext.
234} on appropriate site design before completing the c'sty or county land use approval
process.
aivision a�praval of wetiand delineation reparts is based up4n the informatio� provided
to us. Should addittona! info�rnatian be brought to our attention ar shtiuld site
conditions change, we wiil consid�r the new inforrnation and re-�evaluate the site and
our jurisdictional dete�mination as needed.
k:lwedandskiet-wtt letters\1888199-0493ph{lipmorfurd.doc
r<j'}
Jun 1@ 03 10: O?� M�' �+h� 5' '9681674 p. $
• • :�
Thank yau for yaur report. If! cari answer any questions far you, please do nat hesitate
to contact me at (503) 378-3805, ext. 23�.
Sin ely,
��������
� tAnnette Laika
Wetland lnventory Specialist
Wetlands Pragram
Enc.
cc: Colin Maclaren, Shapira &Associates
Jeffery Kee, LDC �esign Group
City of Tigard, Planning Department
Jan Stuart, Corps of Engineers
LW! file
.
k:lwetlarldsldet-wn tetters11999189-0493Phifipmorfortl.doc
I
ATTACHMENT B:
VEGETATED CORRID4R CONDITION ASSESSMENT DATA SHEETS
Fishman Environmental Services,LLC Project 03066
Table 3.2 Vegetated Corridor Standards
Vegetated Corridor Condition Definition Requirements of Vegetated Corridor Protection,
Enhancement,and/or Miti ation
Good Corridor Condition • Provide certification,per Appendix C:Natural
• Combination of native trees,shrubs,and Resource Assessments,to District or City/County that
groundcover covering greater than 80%of the vegetated corridor meets condition criteria.
the area and greater than 50%tree canopy
exists(aerial measure) • Remove any invasive non-native species� within the
OR corridor by hand.
• Less than 10%of the area is covered by
invasive,non-native species or noxious • If impact is to occur,provide District or City with a
weeds native plant revegetation plan appropriate to the site
conditions developed by an ecologist/biologist or
landscape architect to restore condition. See
Appendix D:Landscape Design.
• Revegetate impacted area per approved plan to re-
establish" ood"corridor conditions
Marginal Corridor Condition • Provide certification,per Appendix C:Natural
• Combination of native trees,shrubs,and Resource Assessments,to District or City/County that
groundcovers covering 50%-80%of the the vegetated comdor meets condition criteria.
area and 26-50°/a tree canopy exists(aerial
measure) • Remove any invasive non-native species�within the
OR conidor by hand or mechanically with small
• 10-20%of the area is covered by invasive, equipment,as appropriate to minimize damage to
non-native species or noxious weeds� existing native vegetation.
(Enhancement up to"good"corridor condition . Provide District or City with a native plant
required regardless of planned impact) revegetation plan appropriate to the site conditions
developed by an ecologist/biologist or landscape
architect to restore to a good corridor condition. See
Appendix E:Landscape Requirements.
• Vegetate corridor to establish"good"corridor
conditions
Degraded Corridor Condition • Provide certification,per Appendix C:Natural
• Combination of native trees,shrubs,and Resource Assessments,to District or City/County that
groundcovers covering is less than 50%of the vegetated corridor meets condition criteria.
the area and less than 25%tree canopy
exists(aerial measure) • Remove any invasive non-native species� wit6in the
corridor by hand or mechanically as appropriate.
OR
• Greater than 20%of the area is covered by . Provide District or City with a native plant
invasive,non-native species or noxious revegetation plan appropriate to the site conditions
weeds� developed by an ecologisWiologist or landscape
architect to restore to a good corridor condition.See
(Enhancement up to"good"corridor condition Appendix E:Landscape Requirements.
required regardiess of planned impact)
• Vegetate corridor to establish"good"corridor
conditions
' Per State,Metro Native Plant list,or other local plant list,whichever is more comprehensive
Storm and Surface Water Rules
Chapter 3 --Page 15
Vegetated Corridor Condition Assessment(VCCA) for CWS Natural Resource Assessment
Site: Fineview Partition
Investigators: Stacv Benjamin & Liz French,
Fishman Environmental Services, LLC
Date: July 9, 2003
Community# 1: Shrub community with grasses along southwest wetland boundary.
Plot#A
% of Comdor 50%
Tree Species, %Cover,Native, Invasive or Noxious - 30-foot radius: 0% cover
Shrub Species, % Cover,Native, Invasive or Noxious - 30-foot radius: 100% cover
*Himalayan blackberry(Rubus discolor, FACU), non-native, noxious, 70%
*beaked hazelnut(Corylus cornuta, FACU), native, 30%
Herb Species, % Cover,Native, Invasive or Noxious - 10-foot radius: 40% cover
*tall fescue(Festuca arundinacea, FAC-), non-native, 15%
*bluegrass (Poa species, -), probably non-native, 15%
*Pacific blackberry(Rubus ursinus, FACU), native, 10%
common velvetgrass (Holcus lanatus, FAC), non-native, trace
*Dominant
%Cover by Natives:40%
%Tree Canopy:0%
% Invasive/Noxious:70%
Corridor Condition: Degraded
Fishman Environmental Services,LLC Project 03066 VCCA Page 1 of 3
�
VCCA for CWS Natural Resource Assessment, cont'd
Site: Fineview Partition
Investigators: Stacy Beniamin& Liz French,
Fishman Environmental Services, LLC
Date: July 9, 2003
Community#2: Grass field along northwest wetland boundary.
Plot# B
%of Corridor 40%
Tree Species, % Cover, Native, Invasive or Noxious - 30-foot radius: 0%cover
Shrub Species, % Cover,Native, Invasive or Noxious - 30-foot radius:0%cover
Herb Species, % Cover,Native, Invasive or Noxious - 10-foot radius: 100%cover
*tall fescue(Festuca arundinacea, FAC-), non-native, 70%
*common velvetgrass (Holcus lanatus, FAC), non-native, 20%
bluegrass(Poa species, -), probably non-native, 10%
Canada thistle(Cirsium arvense, FACU+),non-native, noxious, trace
meadow foxtail (Alopecurus pratensis, FACV�, non-native, trace
vetch(vicia species, -), probably non-native, trace
curly dock (Rumex crispus,FAC+), trace
*Dominant
%Cover by Natives:0%
%Tree Canopy:0%
% Invasive/Noxious: trace
Corridor Condition: Degraded
Fishman Environmental Services,LLC Project 03066 VCCA Page 2 of 3
VCCA for CWS Natural Resource Assessment,cont'd
Site: Fineview Partition
Investigators: Stacy Beniamin & Liz French,
Fishman Environmental Services, LLC
Date: July 9, 2003
Community#3: Forested community at northeast corner of property at Maple Ct.
Plot# C
%of Corridor 10%
Tree Species, % Cover, Native, Invasive or Noxious - 30-foot radius: 90%cover
*Oregon ash (Fraxinus latifolia, FACV�, native, 90%
Shrub Species, % Cover,Native, Invasive or Noxious - 30-foot radius:100% cover
*Himalayan blackberry(Rubus discolor, FACU), noxious, 60%
black hawthorn(Crataegus douglasii, FAC), native, 15%
snowberry(Symphoricarpos albus, FACU), native, 15%
bittersweet nightshade(Solanum dulcamara, FAC+), invasive, 10%
Herb Species, % Cover,Native, Invasive or Noxious - 10-foot radius: 45% cover
*bentgrass (Agrostis species, -),probably non-native, 30%
*Pacific blackberry(Rubus ursinus, FACU), native, 15%
nipplewort(Lapsana communis,UPL),non-native, trace
common velvetgrass (Holcus lanatus, FAC), non-native, trace
soft rush(Juncus effusus, FACVV�, native, trace
common dandelion(Taraxacum officinale, FACU), non-native, trace
catchweed bedstraw (Galium aparine, FACU), native, trace
crane's-bill (Geranium robertianum, UPL), non-native, trace
*Dominant
% Cover by Natives: 135%
%Tree Canopy:90% �
% Invasive/Noxious:70%
Corridor Condition: Degraded
Fishman Environmental Services,LLC Project 03066 VCCA Page 3 of 3
Fineview Partition
Vegetated Corridor Condition Assessment
July 22, 2003
ATTACHMENT C:
ENHANCEMENT PLAN
Fishman Environmental Services,LLC Project 03066
' � I
� �
S /�-� �o/
L� LL
!^ f
V � �
z Q o
0
Q z
� � o
F �
C9 �
� �
� W
0
Wetland Buffer Mea Plmting Plan
r o
m �
Goal: Restore ond enhance 0.14 acres (5,940 sq.ft.) of Wetland Buffer adjacent to o W �
Abandoned Rail Road right — of — way and South East corner of the subject sife. �`' � o
o = cn ,�,
a � o a
Pl�ting ratex v�
Trees 5,940 x .0039 = 24 x 120r = 28 6 species � w o
Shrubs 5,940 x .0069 = 41 x 120% = 50 6 species � � "
o �
Planthy Schedule �°• c�
g9p�,7� Camman Name Ss�entiflc Name �� j�� � } �
Tree Douglas Fir Fraxinus latifolia 10-15� O.C.Ory/Shade 5 � °D �
Tree Wes tern Re d Ce dar Thuja plicata 12'-18'O.C.I�oist/Shade 5 0° °o �
Tree Oregon Ash Fraxinus latifolia 10-15� O.C.Moist 5 � �
Tree Red Alder Alnus rubra 6-10'O.C.Dry 5 �
Tree Oregon White Oak Quercus garryana 10'-15'O.C.Dry 5
Tree Bitter Cherry Prunus emarginata 6'-10'a.C.Dry/Sun 3
.,,.a m-��.
�,. �
Sh�ub Western Serviceberry Amelanchier alnifolia 5'O.C. Dryer 8 � ;'3Design
Shrub Nootka Rose Rosa nutkana 5 O.0 Moist y 8 � �GrOUp
ShNb Red Elderberry Sambucus racemosa 5'-8'O.C. Moist—Dr 8
Shrub Indian Plum Oemleria cerosiformis 5'-8'O.C. Moist—Dry 8 <''°,,;�;�<"' TnC•
Shrub Baldhip Rose Rosa gymnocarpa 6'O.C.Dry g I
Shrub Red Flowering Currant Ribes sanguineum 6'O.C.Dry s Planners
��t rotd 78 Engineers
Surveyors
All oreas of disturbed soils associated with the dryer side slopes ond remainder of the 3300 N.W. 211TH lERRACE
Tract shall be reseeded with an approved tronsition/upland nativ�e seed mix (Herbaceous) HILLSBORO, OREGON 97124
such as: PHONE:(S03) 858-4242
FAX:(503) 645-5500
Comman Name Sdentlflc Name � X Altxdue br PLS+ www.ldcdestgn.com
Califomia Brome Bromus carinatus 20
Blue VYldry�e Elymus glaucus 20 JOB NO.:
Native Red Fescue Festuca ruba var.rubra 50 7009
Large—leafed Lupine Lupinus polyphyllus 10 SHEET N0.
*Pure Live Seed
' Hydroseed applicotion rate: 29 pounds/acre
* Broudcast application rate: 40 pounds/acre
-ASEFILES MLP1999-00017 & MLP1999-00018 °6
%- -� �
��
r
i � ��
� � � i
i � �
, � �i
`��-� / EXISTING BUILDING 99—JS—P1 � / �
�\ ,/ TO BE REMOVED � � �i
� � i
� � � i
�
% /� /� ' �
�
.� \ �/ / - � � /
� \� � 15' PRIVATE STORM � ' �� � �
�
� � �� �"� SEWER EASEk�1ENT � � i� �
� ��� � � � �
i i
�� � � ! i i ,-
RY \� �� � i i ��
�� �� i ' i� � i
-}'�� ���, i i� 25� WETLAND �' `�'
. \�� �� �i � BUFFER � �, �
- -�' �� �� i� � � �
�
" / \ h.;�`� 1 `� `1i �L ��l
, / \ t� 4;� ' � T �j / /
SEDIMENt FENCE�Y'�P.) � \�� � � � � ��� � � �� J' -
� `��� i �
� -�"� ` � � -� � w
� �
�/ i � \�.''�) �i ' C� .� �
�� i
,� REFER TO CHARl AT L01NER -'� o�oo =-�' �� � � �
RIGHT FOR BU�FER RESTORAl10N �� 9°0� � � �
� �� � � � �
�-�CAN7INGS �� � � � � � �
�18-P2 � � ,� - - �, � �, .� - �. .� "
� � 8'x8�RIPR7�P PAD FOR � � �
� i �E-PtDSION PROTECTION � � .� , �' .� .�
��� ���� ' AT PIPE OUTF�ALL � � � PUBLIC STORM � �
��" � � � DRAINAGE EASEMENT �
� � �i ,a, �, ,- %�, �. � � —
� � � -
� � � if �� �� � �� � � �
� i � ,
�� �i � - - - - _.`,�, ` ,�, � .i.
.,._
� �� � i
/� � � � �L �L �L J
/ / /
/ � i � � � � � � .
'G�j.��� „'�� .
, , � �
�
... _ �
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELO
VERIFY THE SIZE, LOCATION &
DEPTH OF EXISTING UTILITIES
ASINS AND AREA DRAINS SHALL BE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION
T SURFACES ARE COMPLETED AND/OR
�IED.
I ND VEGETA710N ARE TO BE PLACED AS SEE EROSION CONTROL DETAILS ON �
FORMED NO LATER THAN S'EPTEI�BER 1 FOR
TION, AND AS WEATHER WILL PERMIT SEE PRIVATE STREET SECTION X — X ON
ARE PLACEp, iHE OWNER/ CONTRACTOR
THE VEGETATION/PLANTINGS ARE
Exhibit '8'
Fineview Farm
Tree Protection & Removal Plan
Prepared for:
Phil Morford
17582 Cardinal Drive
Lake Oswego, Oregon 97034
Prepared by:
Walter H. Knapp
Cern'fied Silviculturist
Certified Arborist-ISA
7615 SW Dunsmuir
Beaverton, OR 97007
Phone(503) 646-4349
. Fax(503) 265-8117
E-mail:walterhknapp@att.net
June 26, 2001
Executive Summary
Thirty-nine trees aze grawing on the Fineview Farm site. Twenty-seven of these
trees exceed 12 inches in diameter. Of these, 6 trees will be cut due to
construction and 21 will be retained. Tree protection measures will be required
for trees neaz construction activities. No tree replacement mitigation is necessary
for this project.
Fineview Farm TPP Page 1
June 26,2001
Walter H.Knapp
Background and Site Characteristics
Grasses and shrubs currently cover much of the area encompassed by Fineview
Farm. However, there are several tree groups on the site. A grove of large
Douglas-firs (Pseudotsuga menziesii) lines the approach lane. Oregon white oaks
(Quercus garryana) are growing along the dryer aspects of the site boundary.
Oregon ash(Fraxinus latifolia) occupies transitional areas in and adjacent to
designated wetlands. In addition, there are scattered orchard trees remaining on
the interior of the property.
Tree Inventory
Species, size, and location of the trees are shown on the tree inventory map. This
iinformation is summarized in table 1, which also shows which trees will be cut or
retained during construction.
Table 1. Tree inventory,Fineview Farm. -
DBH S ecies Total All Total>12
in. Ash Oak Fir A le Walnut Decid Trees in.
8 1 3 4
10 2 2
12 3 1 2 6
i 14 2 2 4 4
16 4 4 4
18 5 1 6 6
20 2 2 2
22 1 1 2 2
24 1 1 2 2
26 2 2 4 4
28 0 0
30 1 1 1
32 0 0
34 1 1 2 2
36 0 0
Total All Trees 18 6 6 3 1 5 39
Total>12 in. 13 6 6 1 1 0 27
Cut trees>12 inches diameter indicated by bold underline
Walter H.Knapp Silviculture&Forest Management Urban Forestry
761 S SW Dunsmuir Lane Beaverton,OR 97007 Phane(S03)646-4349 Fax(503)265-81Y 7
I
Fineview Farm TPP Page 2
June 26,2001
Waller H.Knapp
Tree Species
There are no rare or unusual tree species on the site. A listing of inventoried
species is shown in table 2.
Table 2. Listing of tree species, Fineview Farm.
S ecies Common Name atin binomial
Fir pou las-fir seudotsu a menziesii
Ash Ore on ash raxinus lati olia
Oak Ore on white o uercus a ana
� Walnut En lish walnut u lans re ia
A le a le alus s .
Decid deciduous tree- s ecies not desi ated
Mitigation
City of Tigard Municipal Code 18.790.030 describes tree plan requirements "for
the planting,removal, and protection of trees..." The code specifies that
"retention of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in [dianneter] requires
no mitigation(18.790.030.B.2.d)." As shown in table 3, 78%of the firees larger
than 12 inches is being retained.
Table 3. Mitigation calculations for Fineview Farm.
Category Number of Trees Percent
Total#trees> 12 inches: 27
etain trees> 12 inches: 21 78%
Cut trees> 12 inches: 6 22%
iti ation Cate o : o miti ation re uired. 0%
Tree Pratection
Trees designated for retention that are within 30 feet of any construction activities
will need special protection measures. These include:
• Fencing.
Wafter H.Knapp Silviculture&Forest Management Urban Forestry .
761 S SW Dunsmuir Lane Beaverton,OR 97007 Phone(503)646-4349 Fax(503)265-81I7 • -
Fineview Farm TPP Page 3
June 26,2001
Walter N.Knapp
❑ The Critical Root Zone (CRZ) of retention trees will be protected by
installation of chain link or orange construction fencing to prevent injury
to tree trunks or roots, or soil compaction. The CRZ generally coincides
with the tree dripline.
❑ The project arborist/urban forester will determine the exact location and
type of fencing needed to provide protection.
❑ Tree protection fencing will not be removed or relocated without the prior
approval of the project arborist/urban forester.
• Soil and Root Protection. If it is necessary for any equipment to access the
CRZ, a layer of gravel or other suitable mulch at least 6 inches deep will be
placed in the path of the equipment as root and soil protection. The material
will be removed at the end of construction. Tree protection fencing will be
immediately replaced after such operations are completed
• Storage of Equipment. Construction equipment will be stored in suitable
locations away from retained trees.
• Excavation.
❑ The project arboristlurban forester will provide on-site consultation during
excavation activities within the CRZ.
o The stripping of topsoil around retained trees will be restricted. No fill
material(including temporary storage of spoils) will be placed within the
CRZ.
o Where feasible,major roots within the CRZ will be protected by tunneling
or other means to avoid destruction or damage. Exceptions can be made
if, in the opinion of the project arborisdurban forester, unacceptable
damage will not occur to the tree.
❑ Where soil grade changes affect the CRZ, the grade line should be
meandered wherever practicable. This will require on-site coordination to
ensure a reasonable balance between engineering, construction, and the
need for tree protection.
• Quality Assurance. The project azborisdurban forester will supervise proper
execution of this plan during construction activities that could encroach on
retained trees.
Walter H. Knapp
Certified Forester,SAF
Certi'fied Arborist,ISA PN-0497
Walter H.Rnapp Silvicu[ture&Forest Management Urban Forestry
7615 SW Dunsmutr Lane Beaverton,OR 97007 Phone(503)646-4349 Fitr(503)265-8117
� Exhibit 'C'
UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY
MEMORANDUM
RECEIVrO PLANNING
DATE: May 15, 2000 �qpY 1 7 2000
TO: Mathew Scheidegger, City of Tigard CIl Y Cir T IGARD
FROM: Julia Huffman, USA V/l��
SUBJECT: Fineview Partition#2,MLP 1999-00018
On February 22, 2000 the Unified Sewerage Agency ("USA") Board of Directors adopted
USA Resolution and Order 00-7 (R&O 00-7). R&O 00-7 applies immediately to all
development, unless the development is authorized by approval of a land use application
that was received by a land use authority on or before February 4, 2000 and was approved
or deemed complete by the land use jurisdiction on or before March 15, 2000.
According to the County Assessor's Maps, the partition is occumng on a portion of 1 S 135AA
Tax Lots 1000 and 1301, which does not match the applicants submittal.
SArIITARY SEWER
Each lot in the development should be provided with a means of disposal for sanitary sewer. The
means of disposal should be in accordance with Unified Sewerage Agency's Design and
Construction Standards. Engineer should verify that public sanitary sewer is available to uphill
adjacent properties, or extend service as required by R&O.
STORM SEWER
Each lot in the development should have access to public storm sewer. Engineer should verify
that public storm sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend storm service as
required by the R&O. Hydraulic and hydrological analysis of storm conveyance system is
necessary. If downstream storm conveyance does not have the capacity to convey the volume
during a 25-year, 24-hour storm event, the applicant is responsible for mitigating the flow.
WATER QUALITY
Developer should provide a water quality facility to treat the new impervious surface being
constructed as part of this development.
155 North First Avenue, Suite 270, MS 10 Phone: 503/648-8621
Hilisboro, Oregon 97124-3072 FqX:503/640-3525
May 15,2000
Mathew Scheidegger, City of Tigard
Fineview Partition#2
Page 2
SENSITIVE AREA
A "Sensitive Area" exists. Developer must preserve a corridor as described in the R&O
separating the sensitive area from the impact of development. The wetland/sensitive area shall
be identified on plans.
DIVISION OF STATE LANDS/CORPS OF ENGINEERS
A DSL/Corps of Engineers permit is required for any work in the wetlands.
cxn�o�r 'u'
F'
�' �T� `
' � '��'� �' Division of State Lands
:�,.t �-:, re on
• - '�` • 775 Summer Street NE
.:.� Salem,OR 97301-1279
John A.Kitzhaber,M.D.,Govemor (503)378-3805
FAX(503)378-4844
TTY(503)378-4615
March 7, 2000 RECE��Ep ptANN►u�
State Land Board
I�AR 4 9 2000 John A.Kitzhaber
Governor
Mr. Philip MorFord Cl`XQFT�D Bill Bradbury
17582 Cardinal Drive s��ret�ry�fstate
Lake Oswego, Oregon 97034 Jim Hill
State Treasurer
Re: Wetland Delineation for Jefferson Street property located in
T1 S, R1 W, Section 35 in Tigard, Oregon. Det#99-0493
Dear Mr. Morford:
I have reviewed the wetland delineation report for the above-referenced site. Based on
data submitted by Colin Maclaren of Shapiro and Associates along with his site visit this
month verifying conditions, I concur with the conclusions. The wetland areas mapped
in Figure 4 of the report are subject to the permit requirements of the state Removal-Fill
Law (ORS 196.800-196.990). A state permit is required for fill or excavation of 50 cubic
yards or more in the wetland area. This concurrence is for purposes of the state
Removal-Fill Law only; federal or local wetland permit requirements may apply as well.
The Army Corps of Engineers will review the report and make a determination for
purposes of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act at the time that a permit application is
�submitted. We recommend that you attach a copy of this concurrence letter to any
subsequent DSL and Corps permit applications to speed application review.
Please be aware that state law establishes a preference fo[ avoidance of wetland
impacts. Because measures to avoid and minimize wetland impacts may include
reconfiguring parcel layout and size or development design, we recommend that you
work with Bill Parks, the Division Resource Coordinator for this area (378-3805, ext.
234) on appropriate site design before completing the city or county land use approval
process.
Division approval of wetland delineation repo�ts is based upon the information provided
to us. Should additional information be brought to our attention or should site
conditions change, we will consider the new information and re-evaluate the site and
our jurisdictional determination as needed.
k:lwetlandsldet-wn letters11999�99-0493philipmorford.doc
rt'=}
r�.
. . ;,
Thank you for your report. If I can answer any questions for you, please do not hesitate
to contact me at (503) 378-3805, ext. 233.
Sin ely,
(�;��'��
�
�
Annette Lalka
Wetland Inventory Specialist
Wetlands Program
' Enc. �
cc: Colin Maclaren, Shapiro &Associates
Jeffery Kee, LDC Design Group
City of Tigard, Planning Department
Jan Stuart, Corps of Engineers
LWI file
k:\wetlandsklet-wn letters\1999�99-0493philipmorford.doc
:. .'4.' . .:'. '
� . � . �. '.. Exhibit `E'
, . . . _ ..
' . .� � Wetland Determination`�nd Delineation '. �
. ��= .�- . � for the S.W. Jefferson� Street Prop-erty _
. � iri Tigard, �Oregon :
, .
� - __ e ���.. . . ,:-:. - .�: `Q�, - . .
- _ ...2� fa I..�- .,. :S�• . .V. _ . . . - . . . . .� . . � � ..� .
� .i _ ..
. �I�� /O ��J�. ° .� ' . . .. ,
, ... ,. �/�i„i � r' - - � , . . . ' : . . " . . _ . . . .
. - . . . �:i A,� : 1.' � � - . . • � . . . - . • . . . .. . . . ,. .
":� y' � r��,• i.l�... 'r ' ~ . : �' . .- � . , , � . . .
=���� � �:�,1 " a ,y1 � . � . .
�iT '�`� :J - r •o,� � "
,r � �; 1�_
. •. H��� �-� .y . �.. . ... : ... �.. � . � ,
� : ��'�L7' �� �''� � '�(l �. . . .. . � . . . � ' . . . . .
;� �q��� �� ;`,. .;':� ,.:_,�` � ..il, � � � .. . .
,�:.� ,. , �r
: L�.'nY� o` � ' .�r,t r'\�.'°,�,y ' '� .�, � c�� ` . .. -.. - - :
L °'�"` � ;�
' - � ' � a�w�a .. � � �
�II ��!'. ecvebpmwc ' \i..;
. _
�7
_-Y r � h . . � � '' � `. .,s . � . . . Y�. � . � .
, . �-�����. �`�``� ::1 . -�,.'�=-5:��' ' � . �. Prepared for . _
, ' _' �. «l..+ i�,�;��� '� \. ^� T 3 . ' � .• �. .. . ._ . . '._;�.. .. . . .. ...
. , �,_._, -�,�.;`\� , � _^ . Philip Morford _� _: . _
- . .� �'.,,�� ,,U-'���:� n .�� 1 - , . . . �
� '�:k',«�-;'w_ti 3?. `r• i;�' ,.. '.�: 1' .
' , . ��:..2� .• � 1.,- � . , . , .
• \�—:,:•�+,��'`--�^� I�..•. - �' . � _ • � _ . ..:.." � :
. : . . . � �;, �,�`��;-� ..�° - - ,;: ..�,,T. � �� �Prepared by � � �
• . ;:� :-��. � � , � . .. . .
� �;•.• . = ,; .a. y (18 - � �
. • . :� �::.�;�i_;.'�_ •,.. � � .
' + �1 ~ :.:;;n i .�: `'� ��� `"� . .
. � z��S::y� :.w.�j';� :i°: ::q,�c~ •L � . . , . :
� �'.r': .�`� ` '�i c. � ,'��/ ,' - •
' ... - . Y i.�a-�-�,� / _/-^; A 39 I �( ... , . . � - � . . � .
_ r;'::;��;, ` G .. -a _. �� .
_ �,090 •vzise� ,. .
t . • _ . .
. . . . SRI/SHA.PIRO/AGCO,,Inc: . :: :�'. � _ �
_ .. _ � � _ � . .� ., . - :
� . � ':� _:April 2, 1998 .. �. .�
. , . . . . . •_
, � .
Wetland Determination and Delineation
for the S.W. Jefferson Street Property
in Tigard, Oregon
Prepared for
Philip Marford
17582 Cazdinal Drive
Lake Oswego, Oregon 97034
Prepared by
Julie Fakuda
SRUSHAPIRO/AGCO,Inc.
1650 N.W. Front Avenue, Suite 302
Portland, Oregon 97209
SRI/SHAPIRO/AGCO, Inc. Project#7971490
Apri12, 1998
. �.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
SRI/SHAPIRO/AGCO,Inc. (SHAPIRO) contracted with Philip Morford to conduct a
wetland determination and delineation on an appro�cimately 2-acre property located south
of the intersection of S.W. Locust and Jefferson Streets in Tigazd, Oregon. The project
site is located in Township 1 South,Range 1 West,N.W. 1/4 of Section 35 of the
Willamette Meridian in Washington County, Oregon(Figure 1).
The proposed project involves a 6-lot partition for a residential development south of
Locust Street,bounded on the west by 90th Avenue, and the east by Jefferson Street.
SHA.PIRO conducted a wetland determi.nation and delineation on the entire site. The
deterrnination and delineation were conducted to identify any wetlands that might be
affected by the proposed project.
2.0 METHODS AND SOURCE MATERIALS
21 The Federal Manual
The primary document used i.n SHAPIRO's investigation was the Corps of�ngineers
Wetlands Delineation Manual, Technical Report Y-87-1 (Environmental Laboratory,
1987). This manual is currently recognized by both the Oregon Division of State Lands
(DSL)and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) for deli.neation of wetlands within
Oregon.
The 1987 Manual (Manual)provides technical criteria,field indicators, and
recommended procedures to be used in determining Whether an area is a jurisdictional
wetland and the location of the boundaries of the wetland. The Manual requires three
technical criteria to be met in undisturbed situations before areas can be considered
wetland under federal or state jurisdiction. These criteria aze hydric soils, hydrophytic
vegetation, and wetland hydrology.
Hydric soils are those that have formed exclusively under wet conditions (soils that
characteristically have high water tables, are ponded or frequently flooded, or are
otherwise saturated for extended periods during the growing season).
Hydrophytic vegetation consists of those plant species that have adapted to growing in
substrates that aze periodically deficient of oxygen due to saturated soil conditions. Five
basic groups of vegetation aze recognized based on their frequency of occurrence in
wetlands. These categories,referred to as the "wetland indicator status," are as follows:
obligate wetland plants (OBL) are estimated to occur almost exclusively in wetlands
(>99%); facultative wetland(FACV�plants are esti.mated to occur 67%-99% of the time
in wetlands; facultative (FAC)plants occur equally in wetlands and non-wetlands(34%-
66%); and facultative upland(FACt�p�ants usually occur in non-wetlands (67%-99%).
If a species is not assigned to one of the four groups described above it is assumed to be
yYetland Determination and Delineation for the S.W.Je,�"erson Street Property in Tigarc� Oregon
Page-I-
-- — � � � � �� —-- `��� � � -;. � �' ��—
� � . :r�'�,(I '� � =r►.�►11�i� � �.
,, ,. �.�--i �' , _'i��', ;�, �,
v!� � �� �- - ��;C;r��'d�`; �1'�`�� �����; i
• -� 1r
��a h 4� ���� ���r:,,��,,�,���__�����:�: � ..
��i� � � � , - �--_ -
__� `��ii�,� ` -,��c : � _ ���'+^T���i►�ol�';�I��ie d '�� :�;.
�� ,s�i��� - � C� ��� ;��. I�' ����^„��
. �/ „�.., - --C-�-- 1` (�� il� , o , ��
-�0-- l!� � � -� � --��--����'' .•-'' ��
, . �r ; ,_ ,�__L__� ��,.��� I/",,� .�v,�_��
��� V/ ��.I.�aa�i�i'�.����.�.,o«�
G--- J� _' _ --�s�..._ �,�� �r.z�,,,�v/
`��� I f��/ \� � 1✓Q�a�u+'��F�a'�.16ii ����
� . � •� »- ���
T=�
\�� � _ ••.. �— � I� \�F.^��±���� ��1
_ IA �' ���;1 �`��!:'�������
'� -- r
� � __ _,,,� , _ ��� � �. -
.
� a+� \ ��:. I ���\�Y I�����
_ � I: �., � l����o � �./�---�-
�� � �"II . ' �_� �����Q..�
--�' . 'II r, . ��, � - ��,� -��i���
I —�� I ���1:'.:
� i I - �� .�� � ��'��������:
, �i••� � � I - - r� --1
� , �� ��; � �., ,��li��/IL__ ;�
��' + ���i���►-��—�.,Ir- ,
� - �� ���•,i.�.����
�� .!/ _ d� ����. �'�.�i
r'1�'; • � � . •.. -� ��'�,�;�r�`�
� �=� �,. ��_ , - - .. �� .�
°.� � , ' ��'•: � =' '�
� -�� '� '.. ���
��� :���,���.��_J,r����.�,
� , ;. •� _ �,,�--T-+-- -
:�.%` � �- � �'-� ,�'��'.,,.��.,��%=_I�'��-�����(_111����
�.�=, ' J � ��������T I��Il�ili����.��.;�
_ - ,. -�--
� �� �� �;,-�- �- ����r���,��
� :,
— \ • � ��a�����:������s�.
__ ��� __ '(- ��� , ��► �:
�� � � � ��
- •�, .. �. � �;� ��
� .��.-�.� �
- - •-.-_��� 'E�.:--�'�•-=���t��;`� ; � , d_
--_ — =a .r�`p — ^�'—��- ��.�.�'��� � ���
- �� • �� �---4.=1-� I�
�
U _I�I �
_ ., /� �i T��,���i`�'- i������• �
-\ � --�—___ _ .���I� ��� � ___
�, l �
1 ' ' '� �/ • �"t11 ro+��1��`\�� �
��1� i����;�' .�� 1 ��� o , �
� �m ��i� ���/d�
�
- '�''� - '- `�-� )_!�-� .����8�J:.� `
_ ����� ,r��.� �', � II, � • �,
, `�i!" . `��*��`�,�/� \� : , f
��
��_ .�!� i � ��:� . ����,,�.�� e
r—��-�"',� '�' - � \ r„ � % ���1�i>"�w� ,� ;, II�--
� �� � --�`.�� � ��.� � �� \�[i L�
� ��� � ,�� \. �� �P�� 1 � ��,�
`-t— �_�___ a � � ���,�/-.,, � � � , y
r -�, � � % V � � `���.� .,�it �. �����
,, % ��'- ,,i� � ��I
— _ _ •p• :� �.� � `I ���\�
i � ��� � � � ,,����y�
' r �'f� , �-��'� �I
-- � �` �:- � ' �� a�
7 �j 'e��' � ./ ���-" ��"v. I� �
�" � � ; :�.,���. �-;�-��,; ,
„ � �
-- � -�- \��; ',�'�;7���i�.� � • `' ��
1 _ �.j . � I . � �I
����' ' �',:�'���� '�1 ;��
�, ,' � , ; b,� • � -� ` ._.���
., , _ _- -
. �.� •:
� • ' - � •�� • .� • • •�• '• �
• � � - � • • �
C - • • • • • .. � � 111
� � � ' � �:' _ . � • � �
� .
an obligate uptand(UPL)plant,which is estimated to occur slmost exclusively in non-
wet�ands(�Q9°la). Inadditionrglants designated"NI"ha�r�not yet F€ce,�vec��w��an�
indicator status,but are probably not obligatc upland. A'+'or'-'included with the
indiEa�sta�f e g: Ff4E+or�A£U}tn�ieates that certai�pfa�tspecies-falt irrt6 a
certain indicator status category,but aze inclitted toward either more wet(+)or more dry
� (-�conditions within tbat in�cator status. An asterisk(*}preceding a regional indicator
identifies a tentative assignment hased on either limited infQrmatiQn Q=canfliciing
reviews. The asterisk is intended to encourage submission ofadditionai field review
infartnatiQn_
Th�lblauua�defiucs wetianc�hydroIag}ras saturaiiou withzu a maJ6r portion of t�"ie root
zone(usually above I2 inchcs),typically for at least 12.5%of the growing season. The
wetland hydrology criterion can be met,howevcr,if saturation within the major partion
of the root zone is present for only 5°fo of the growingsea�on,degending_onthe�cetland
status of the plant community. The growing season far any given site or location is
detcrnoined-frou�T�I.S. Depa�tme�t o€�4gri��l��{USD,4}Atelt�a���so�ree
Conservation Service(NRCS;fornaerly Soil Conservation Service [SCS])data and
infonnation
2.2 Field Methods
. Field wQrkv�ra.s canducie�Q�May 4,LQQZ. $efar�beo n�fieidwork,aua�labla
. information was compiled and reviewed. This included a review of NRCS soil surveys;
tbe-�:5. 6eologiea}3tuvey�SfiS}Beavertom,OreB��ff�P����8te fY�7�;
and the U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service(USFWS�National Wedand Inventory(NWI)
Beaverton, Oregon map(1982}. This information was used to develop a preliminary
indication of where potential wetland maye�cist and tQ facilitate on-site gathsrin�of data.
Qbservations_of sails,vegetation,._andh}tdLOlag�c�vetemade-usingth�"Routiae-QttsitG"
method of the Manual. One-foot-diameter soil pits were excavated to a degth of 18
inehe��se}eete�koeaE'rons. F�icsoil-pro�es wercexanuried-farhydricsoils anctwettaa�
ktydrology f eld indicators. In addition,a visual percent-cover estimate of the dominant
species oft�ic plant community for a 3�-foot-rad`ius area was perfarmed using soil pit
locations as a ceuter of reference. Data were recorded in the field and subseguentlX
h-ansfened to sta�ndazd w�ttand delineation data sheets(incIuded in the appendix of this
regQrt�. IIata�ceLe calle�ted fo�rsp=esentaii�ce sampling-lncati4ns,an�numecoussoil pfE� ..
were excavated between these data points to verify changes in the three pazameters.
Wet(curd Determiaation mrd DelineatioR jor the S i3!Jefferso»Stree!Property in TFgm��pregon
Page-2-
3.0 EXISTING SITE CHARACTERISTICS
3.1 Physical Setting
The project site is an irregulazly shaped property, located on a gently sloping,mostly
open field bordered on the southeastern side by a narrow forested drainage channel. The
property is bounded to the north by residential development. 90th Avenue, a local
thoroughfare,borders a portion of the western property boundary. A gravel parking area
is located in the northwestem portion of the site, adjacent to 90th Avenue.
3.2 Topography
Topography on the site is flat to gently sloping from the westem end to the eastern end of
- the site. Surface elevations across the site range from approximately 200 feet in the
northwestern portion of the site to 190 feet above National Geodetic Vertical Datum
(NGVD) at the southeastern end of the site. A shallow drainage is located along the
southeastern property boundary.
3.3 Iiydrology
' Hydrology is influenced by a shallow drainage which flows north to south immediately
offsite neaz the southeastem properly boundary and on the western side of an old railroad
grade. Hydrologic features on the site include evidence of surface ponding on the eastern
portion of the site, and lineaz subsurface drainage features in a field which appeaz to be
associated with a drain tile system.
At the time of the field visit,wetland hydrology indicators observed on the site were in
the form of saturated soils neaz the ground surface at the eastern end of the open field,
evidence of surface ponding earlier in the season, and low volume flow in the drainage
channel. Although hydrology indicators were somewhat marginal on the May 9, 1997
site visit, a high water table was observed in some portions of the site on the Apri125,
1997 site visit. Oxidized rhizospheres were observed in some of the sample plots.
3.4 Soils
Two soil types,Aloha silt loam (mapping unit 1), and Huberly silt loam(mapping unit
22)have been mapped on the site by the NRCS, as shown in Figure 2. Huberly soils are
classified as hydric soils and Aloha silt loam may have inclusions of Huberly soils
(NRCS, 1989). .
Aloha silt loam consists of somewhat pooriy drained soils that formed in alluvium or
lacustrine silt on broad valley terraces. The surface Iayer is typically dark brown(lOYR
3/3) silt loam, about 8 inches thick. The subsoil is a dark-brown(lOYR 4/3) and dark
- yellowish brown(lOYR 4/4)mottled silt loam about 38 inches thick. Permeability and
Wetland Determination and Delineation for the S W.Jefferson Street Property in Tigard, Oregon
Page-3-
`_;� Yc±l�'S: F!�1.+.. � y'.�.�' �~,• � ` ..1''e''" Sa� ' �••,���� ,�''�.+�'�7 .. ��.�- +`� �• ..-..
� � :s.
✓ ���.��,�� �;��?`�� -:z�;._ �a�''!��L+�'3j��a._' �'' �.��� +s,`��.3t�,� 1;.,,;j?r ��t . .,���'"-,,�, .�11'���+'`.�'
i;,���'a,��'��`" '�'� '[;>•P /'��, �►."^ 7�S�J4�) .�'„y �� 45�:;�',p�`T•f�f;.,t�l��r:. .��. .��:et�,t :4���,'� �� ?y:.
c y�'.i �{ V[�+ a, ri� �b c��[�y'�'.'iS �rn., a � ' � �f'9� f•.�•- Y.
C)\' .:,�;�al R.�1' ` =!• . ,• ' i� t t +«..;•.e.w. �`he�ai,�, �' . �.Y� S����� : ��i6/i
S"S �� !iy� �'i .;. g !!yri�'��i:..�Yl•��� ��, r�..�..-I��► 'w'���y��:l�,.
';,�.� :.��:^4��`ar i.; T �`�� !� ''"ti ,;,}�� '�� w� ��'. 6*°° �;s•.L,:�w.�i� �C�'•rr�i
�fj�k. 'ri.•�.i. " A° -�'1,! ,, r••• ."��;�i+�•~ � *„�+1d �'?� .:"r•�tr;�y�•��s•��.•� �:��:.'r3
:l:.G':3'L� o �� .- ' . 11�h �i. 14 Y r r. '
�s�y•d�r w� r ��'�:� - �� "'.�',v'1. 3�. v if�' `P 9"x� ��fti .�? •�., 1..��..
�1'` ,,vv�' _ • s'r � 1 rl;.' 6, "/�•.��,�....f-�� 'sr'�
�Y ��°�:•v�l {�+ �z_ _ '�, �,�•y. � ',i'�'" �y ��t�r�� 9���+'�'fi"w.'5����M,i �s
�s 17��� -.'�' :� ° ~�� F J,,�,3fi � �s,,• .3��'�?
J F�. V �Y �,_�.•)'M
. .:T.; .�A,�. ��.i-��'��:sY� _..� •�1. �� �-�- �`'�=��� ���?..����y ,r.�-,_. �,.,
� � f i•f� �t.. � f•.i w4'r.�-3 J�p•�'••��•• 'i
p►^,s! . � •v.►�tJ� ' � � ,j-_ `n.�:.�{ st~I�'+,���5: ,�C� :r
".S� . �
����w�s .�r '� •r���� F � �. . v'T-�j � .•• Z � :c►.
_tt ..' � 4. � t 9 `�,�y ��� �� .�F.1� y� ; ��,��.�M.
� � . � ii�� ��i.�x' ` �9� �i�,t�, � f`��`'�t' . � .t �
��� � GL:.� �• '+'T^�i8► L���`�3".�a,.r���3.i\a��t w �'-� •. �yR: .�::.
+_ ��y� .q ♦ I� �' �,:t. !
�;7! •ia�.• a�-:�1 �7��� '� al'' r�s� ��If1_�'_.�`1.�-�.�] s. f�'�. ��* �. �1.�..U,A: 4.'.2
�Y.��� � •� �; ;l :}�.��� \ �.\,�" w h . �_�. 7�'�
� �� �I�� YN�� '� y� •.��tCi��Yf 4LL���p-�c��i�'=.j� '��.i.r��'Ifii�'.�i� �.,¢�:_��wY�'
w.�� S � "r- t::s x- wa s:r • ,�r. v,.,-- �.
^_�� � , �!.,:��� .t� y�i��:,�:.::.x.ic-aa: �.�;�`�w<:;4sw:�;...
• S t�±4G��!`� �� i'y(4t;i�f.tC�]R''. �1• c a
� �T ���'� �\�I � � � ��� �� 1 1.4�•% .;7i•• � F•�^••
. � � ,�,, . � � :r,. i ��.. :a�.
����� � R _..`;S iy�3jw�'11S�'�'���� •' •• .�+�ti�'i-�:��is��,r�"f�' �,., Vt���`•�11�.
:�•. .t� 'J,�; ��„�� t �4�:[`�r�. :� �u,.G.'$yt..�.' � .
��y,, i"�'. ��k'�� � ��'`��`-4s�� `Q��n}'�`% �i•`. L .�, SL �..���' .'�f.�',�,,�V4 �� `:
5:;,`. r � '• .s: r •' /�y�^acw�17p: �.�I�� �'}' ��y'i��. .
�� - .��' � ••t•',1' •�a _j�Ml� �1�� -t J •1 ..�7�.I�fi Ylq �Yi�-�ri .;�+.
.�5. E �. �.'t3� ! i �q' t
ti3 :I�S .,_'{� � { �. �i�ft �� ��+ 'Y �`�.��f���t� '�� >�?. t �,t.�...
�`f�iA� � '�� '� , „� .1 L. •,f,� v I�'J ,��;?1. � ►�,.J� y �•�.l:iw�
.i• ,� �''.��-`� �; �-�,+�` •+-�^,�B��� b'�i;�� �"w�`�,+�*.•'�°r�`�'�..'�{�iy�j', -
` f.. ,• i.
� �. �. .��� . .. v�.� ,� , . t' � .:•.��� "..'_�
• � ���:�_.._- ��� . . ���0 _' � �1y{�'�,fiy�r'�s�M�� H�.x' :,;�
't;'P��Rr+r.""r`s .���. �.� _+r�- ��� as\��c.Li�°''T�-� �l .i�' ��''����~�.£s�,�
�ti. �.a�ti+�`,`�Q""�T' �,Z:f�'4. �� -i:'.=�S'=•�Te�;� i, �,�•.��e�.�,a.. i� ;�3. "� 1 r.y?. � .I .j...
--�?',�.. �:�--�+. �;,� ��� • t � �_ `_,-�' . ''t i•�"`,�t��� � . .
.. � . -'.a,�f � �,,r��'
�'� �• � 7 '' � � �. '-��� � �'''•,�`�.������' ��»�
�+�.� 5� � � � �� � ! ✓. ��tM���� '��y�!.',� �''"o i��"`���.w
y ;� ��. � ;�' �M �\:n���f ' �.��'� � � r�:�.�• 4 ea.,���'-"��-�`� '
�"y� :+b:r, +► :.1� i�' �� •.�.���� �� �
�,'�y ti ��e v�dR�.�r� .n,,,..��• �"�..�. �:;t� .'�1 mwt" � �1�,�,_ �
R��•.a5a e •�1� � �r:.� �� Ar'Y`x 'w . c,,_���,- �• i a
� ` 4 � � ' �..��y� � • -� � 1 � f�
♦' ,� ,�J�t1 .r �.����� ..r ,r� y a:.
c a��G'�f.». '7 ►• - i�' S��
��= � .� ���� '�'�'+ �' � r ,i �• ��L!'
• ' �I .'�. �� w� ��I�
lw�� MM�� � w �i��,�L����/� r.��L;� ' � �
w.A�� �����i _'•+- �/� t :• �.. e '��!� ���
,S��, rry�^y�� ,�� �'Y-�+ i'�•\� 1��6 �_3�` '�,'�i�'^^' .�y �
i� i�sT Y+'' � ����� •��{�Z ��� f�Or t�
2� 1 � .��
'i• ��rir �' t�„�'C'�.5. �S:''r. �iir. �',.4^y"� �./�
"� - - Jr � ���`�:� _ � ,�:��f
f� ' 1• `.f4y,. 'v . . �• r. ��'•`r� . t fi�Y♦ _
"s. r��. �����S�.I�e��L ).'f:, ' 'f� �� ♦ _. � � ' ;. '
y�� ~�' .7 '•�
�ti '='"�.'-i� �}�'_� �S4. �'�i '�;•. nti?%. �. — � ��` �� '�t�r
� �_�:� y."`'�' i.,]..�'M:'•�..��ir.' ��y e' � `��*��.q�.�! ; ~�s'a
� '�''��-� ��+p y; ,'•t- :tt�� •�``�1/�'J�_L . � �s' �;�t!�9:.�������j7-Pi ' ��s7[
�. .r��"i-:y:'-� r e�1�°ti,ytl.�! C'�3�� ����,51�lP J � .. �����:r{.t`t�A7f �:;:r,� +`�.
:Lx'-C��� •.�' �.� '�j�'�1 y R.���`�.1��� .�:� ! � .���'-�:Cf���� ti
n� :r �$• �•:•� �� � � �'� �.��.' t'•.4.,���'a� �ry�a �• ��;�.•.
���=��� E-�,�;'L-'" i� �.y � � • J I�;, �y�.��'�S.s �'�
:�=7�' ���v:,nz����J��S��'".�i� ��f ti ��C�'a7'�}��A'.i+ /a A,��S,
r yr
� � � . .r.. �� 'i� y�J +.
' 1 � . . . 7 sg . �S�
.p ,�.�!• � •�� IT�i ��C.�' �•C�� .�'�, i��V f d (.l �"Q'ii��
:�'P !P ���}�,tL.. v �/�%� � ;�?.� �' r�Y:
:� ���/�.a� �j.y�J� :�y � .�'+' Y �t � t�ti, T �:
i�'� ry �."� �� ���""� , •� �F � '� �J! i��. �► ��'Y�.a'��\
�F��'�.t1.• ����� ! '- ��� #�a� .. r�a
llr�w, ..wa'y•' � .��� .._�,j't�T•�~'f��+l"����'� <��C�id %x 2_�'� ���\
,'ra ��$� " � f�Y����:�i"� �'�'� �. ��i�r
�..'��,�''� '.., '��yc�''�`�.- � ';��� =� �f�'�l� -. �� �,�'
.ss y �J.��f..
j � �` � . •�` '��� J� � � ��r�'�`'�!` v�
�p' 1 S�L( �{ .�w� �✓�'f r'J��'�L� '�:� �
ti��:�1a�: .'�'�. J��# .Y• �y ern `/f ' 1 • ♦ I�����r.r:v. �P�s" ���n
�.��f� � �i-'ti: '- :.'xyi'���.•I'"�:[�. '7�• � � �r �
� � � ' •f ' ��:��7� ���l���
�`4 0 �� �,�,�Jf •J•� .. � �'�' ,� � 'i s��• 'e• �� �..� �i^il?
""��"�r.�j , w 4 (���' `Y '�-y�_rJ •'�/� •.��.s_:' - •t;� •^�� •� ��:j�u• �ey2,�;
.�-wqFx�nK��` M�Y N� q�X'!''.�X�r�� �'�-�` � -�r+.�. ��J��.� �.t'.i �1 f�',+.��� �4�{�.A�^
�;• '" �. -�.' k i '�+•� K � '�ai � T`�}' :l?.�3��� +�x�t ~ .T
'��'"� :y� j �j ir�i,F 4` � _ �, y��r. y,��Y S_'��e 1 �� ;� a 4
< a �� � � . f" .
_�.1�n '�' S • .� �/� {�' �' 'q = ���,�� !.!
:i�� s t- � ' G� .
• =�r' ��• �,�, ` 4:a ��� �f •. �',,��;�.1 �� ` s
• �. '� �J ��" � ,��:� �. . �i7.7 5+�. t+ • m
• ���C , •.� ��Ci<,� ��. ��,; +� '�f
i: ��Si �;v� 7.: S��T�. , r�!
� � 17iiP:3��7��s'� ..i �_� �f.»w. �i�'=f�� �R'�w�t .•.�' .4 ',�!'
����C�' � '�' � Y�'•7'� t ''�
S ' y��� �r��`!��•-R'�����,��• ,.�s� •/.'� j� `l �?��-��r `" �
t �� t. i��� �1 sRt� ,�, ��,Y��' �;�e °f",��•a��,�,, i� ' ,.
� «i° • = rsi• P!�'
!, !�'�L��wSc������"`.�..� �`t, ' .,°�,,�� • '�*+ � ,,� r,�
�(/�'�I�''� � i:����d}' • �1� +ee'":Mt'^'�.y� . �`r,��".':. l;! %t=j
� V �r���� � ���' ^•• {..C��w �'t��f�i•: t�
• ,�, ••�
� • �/ � � � ��� � � � � /� � �
� • � • � � � � �
I I / • I I � '•I ���� �i
. : � � � • �
�•.•�
.
. • .
runofF are slow. Aloha silt loam is classified as a fine-silty,mixed,mesic Aquic
Xerochrept. This soil type is mapped on most of the project site except for a small area in.
' the north central portion of the site.
Huberly silt loam consists of poorly drai.ned soils that formed in mixed silty alluvium. It
is a nearly level soil in concave positions on broad valley terraces. The surface layer is
typically very dark gray(lOYR 3/1) silt loam about 8 inches thick. The upper part of the
subsoil is grayish brown(lOYR S/2)mottled silt loam about 17 inches thick.
Permeability is slow and runoff is slow to ponded. Huberly silt loam is classified as a_
fine-silty, mixed mesic Typic Fragiaquept. This soil type is mapped in a small azea in the
. north central portion of the project site.
Soils sampled on the site were mostly silt loam,with a few azeas of silty clay loam.
-- Colors varied from dark grayish brown(lOYR 4/2) and very dark grayish brown(lOYR
3/2)to dark gray (lOYR 4/1)and very dark gray 10YR 3/1). Varying degrees of
redoximorphic features were present in most of the sample plots.
3.5 Vegetation
The western half of the project site is an open field with scattered trees, shrubs, and a
lazge patch of Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor•,FACL�. Dominant grasses and
forbs in the open field aze common velvet grass (Holcus lanatus; FAC), white clover
(Trifolium repens; *FAC),red fescue (Festuca rubra; FAC+), Carolina geranium
- (Geranium carolinianum;UPL},hairy cat's ear(Hypochaeris radicata; *FACL�, and
annual bluegrass(Poa annua; FAC). Other common species include vetch(Vicia sp.;
UPL),tall fescue(Festuca arundinacea; FAC-), and Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis;
FAC). Scattered trees in the open field include Oregon ash(Fraxim�s latifolia•, FACV�,
and Douglas hawthom(Crataegus douglasii; FAC).
Downslope and east of the open field is an azea dominated by nootka rose (Rosa nutkana;
FAC), hardhack(Spiraea douglasii; FACV�, and Himalayan blackberry.
The strip of vegetation on the banks of the drainage channel is dominated by Oregon ash,
red alder(Alnus rubra; FAC),beaked hazelnut(Corylus cornuta; FACLn, one-seeded
hawthorn(Crataegus monogyna; *FACU+), snowberry(Symphoricarpos albus;FACLn,
and red-osier dogwood(Cornus stolonifera; FACVi�. Kentucky bluegrass and sword fern
(Polystichum munitum; FACtn are present in the herbaceous layer.
4.0 PROJECT FINDINGS �
The USFWS, as part of the NWI program,has not mapped any wetland within the project
azea(Figure 3). The NWI maps were generated primarily on the basis of black and white
' aerial photographs(scale of 1:58000)with selected "ground-truthing" only conducted to
confirm the interpretations. �
Wetland Determination and Delinecrtion for the S.W.Je„�erson Street Property in Tigarc� Oregon
Page-4-
�. -(�r. . .J�dl�l�x'".� � � � Y �.�� '�ti �I � ' � � :yt �Q .Ci( y� + '\_ �.'�:= % .
• � ` ,,,� :�, :�:; � . Nt•• �'Ct. '�� 5 r "�i �\ '��` �L�*
'i• ' • '• N' �� ./:. •z wJ i `:� `"r� '� i c \�.yp4..
.�E�t.�� .j %: OW ... � �, �:�1 �•. I�
__�-,:�! 1>.,li.i. ,�� i�. . ... :� o(ai _ - � �' � i �% . •
^^- '_I��,�'�_ '� 1 7�'. �-' :..._ `..;_ � \ _��. ; � � ..� v
,•iT!y �� • ;�:;�':_". • . _� 1
` ].,ic _ -- ' �., .;�t ••VO��.::�ycS:.i;w�l.1..-��-; --i f�ls ' y��..11 � �3 ��"J i.
`«/�. - •� �� Z - Seh �:¢�� .`-� - - - �L�:,���� � ��-�
'j ��_-�.� �� M�-.�� L'���••�IG� �� W� I :, ? �' y��y. � _.. .�
� / -O�i o: �}J A�1
1;; _ .�:�--- bo �t: ', �v �:-� Y' PFOay�... � � � y
\ �;;; .-�,.'`
,-, .I,� ,�, .>'�.�'. ,y` p�OIY� ', �:. _ 1' r= � u. 1 .; �'/.��'�'1 _y �'�'�•'
�; .� /.:, i �' , ,/::.�:. 1{, °�� ; - ���' � i'�j P --�;�: 1;��'
'P551W ► - i �!• �•a :,,� � ,�r. _� .
_ -- '-.- }K -�-�----;a-=�.(�,- ' ` ��:�-- -�.
h '_—_ : ' _ � T, .�SJ� _,` 5 . '`�i
_ �� :`�r .. �' _"__'_� i � :�(n . . . �-...�i _��i P 'z•y^J.��
� �' . ;�^' ��
�Y�� • .::7� :, �����•. :�C, • � �-'''/ ��0 � � . ��4w,� ••��34{1_�- . ST'�.
"� '� � � ¢"� ��.� ;'ISi�smi� �'�, � _ '
�, �� � •P�Stw ��- �� ;:'�'�i �� _ v}���----,_�. � � _$_��= �pF �Y�" : ' . •�
.:, ,�.,,r. .:�� '�OWlSZX��-.�''� . ,.` " f"""'��
�y t• �' F�Z1lRA� c,������ -- ° i ' ���� •' / . . -
� P�iY PEMIYd ' � -" . ~� � ."�i.���,�; �` �� '�f � ::
EM . ; :�; ��,' �' �r �•. :/;. . �� . .�. • .. ;.,Y:. .
,•�,. . .. 4 pK •,.
x REM1Yx , � � '��� � t �;;re�.,, ���Ei • _� • y ., Y,:. .-LS.
'/ .�,. �� �: ; �1. 1 \: ��. '� •i .��K'• .t�Y •� RRY 'ry'F..
^^'i _ • ` •/•. • ' z :✓'.
i- -� _ �q; , l• '• •"; �;`'l —,�:•�2 �7
� .--�.� t .. ��'� �--��ca� �.�•�.. � .v.. �,_ �f :, , _ ':,,�
. . j �; , t , � z:. , .
- .' ' ,', : ' rner•� ''� ;. �f y r , � 1 •;�
� EMFy v�FOiw-� .,: .;.; � "° ._�-�'%e� .� �.' � ''i. ; ., �iX�b..;�
' . �t i:�r a=�--"' � - . • I: --��� :`_:. _,;..
,\•. ,'/ .._ ., + ,G; .�. ` `- `_,,.�_. '
- '�� SIY. `' . 1 ' .._ � ,'�'�...� :�' :�•r • --
_. • '' . . �; � , proposed t: ...�1}: =r� f_�:"�.
��l ' '� ' • Ti:i,liiit�c�� � _� ,�:a.'� deve -•: :���� ;:. F=�.�..�--_�- '\
` .. � �� y� • -- _ _
� � �EM4Y-o _/�'POW zz �:. T��_- lopment �s�.�� • � �rk _:g�:- ,-�._. . ::�.:
-�._�,. �— R30vVZ� i - �. �; , - ' �'- �- n ..:+. +!�•! �j . '�� ' r'_
PEMIY ' ,.;.��` - . ��.� ?, ;�p01nfKZx• � - `'� -
s.�,;. �,;�_�-�-� �
:iio;. i . ���,�`3��� �� � �_._ '�� • :., }�(�/('�y� ;.r:. : ; o�:� � , ;,E, .'__iT.�
POYYZ5'_ '�-' . _ ii�•t-'� f r,: ,!�` -}'- �.� .
- /• . � � ' __ 1 ^C '"{({7/ �3;_�,,. - ;1 h* ' ��� �
� Y ��� . ,.� � •r .i,s•,�, / yj , ��' ��o.J�
:;_='� ���� PEM�Y ` , �"� �� -; —_••- :P�1�t11� . `�� � s;�"y��� ��--^.; {
' `� �/. PEM(Y' . �. � \� �, : �? : .:� �„ .��, ,
. ..� ' I ' � y . �I�PI`_E . .+��� ���`1 k
, "'_\.����. . �. .< �� ' � - _ .. �i.�. �,� �. �1�,._�__-1 ' ���' }�.'k
_ ��� '�_ 'E?OWKZh , \ ROW x: �. , ''�,•'.'- :�.•�_PEMtW.': i;J`' .'i
. . . �;� :�- �� �= � . Grecnhtu ' :�'' -�.t �;4
.. •��%�.. _:�`�•�.� '.`pE►i11`t:.. 'PfiMI -�• _ .,. .
'�:-:__ 1 � �' L
�� .... .. _�� .. .�\; , rii• c,n'p��tYx y ��°.,::;� . ' .. . •^� .� �'
\ ::i':•�•:::.;. ' . j : ' '1�1�.'i�f•. - '�'=:: : • ' .� ,.,� -'�;" '•; . i
PL'MLY�: ,_;,-�._' � . . .' P MIY� � : ` '� •� : :• �!:: ' ' "��` � +�' >
,_._ • • Y �54 --� ��� :� : 'I.. �,. .• ��
•POWz._�- � ��• �' ...t1'•.;,. ,: �•• {/�` •r z�
r '�' . 'ti�a' '.•1':+i.cR�� r t ' . ..:, i: �r. .:�. i.� :
��� " ' • ,{Z��wZ�,�• � • .. } ��.
•• :�� PEMJW" r, : ,�,: - ��'__.v'� . . ��•��.r Y
.-�}. RFOIW . • ,;:.. i'. �� _ �, • •::.� .: - 'v.
�..._.. ti `�� `ti•� - • ^ 1 - .. .
.,. ..:. . .'�, .. " �•..aF ����•��- 'L :••.•�',D:<5' .�• .� -
�''�� . .� ' �,�.''�.'•.. •....,�.:, � ' ; aowKZz�
. ..•_ • t.• -:;;.. �,... f• ,.i�•� 55
" ' 'F.o�Y �: , . . � r_-. . . :� l�r > .i�` .; n � - �_ _ PE �
--.: `.� _�,:`oi
-". !I'��_�jy�� .• :.\,/.•'��-'�:._� .�'�.��::� .t.4.`' • `:� • �.\� i•- •�-.��.. �' J,��,
;(' •'r •_ , �•.,' 1 i ",.. •: "•�•.��••���' -.��� .�:!:: �"` .
�' p ••"'''�,'��� %! ' •PFQr �.� �ti.v�t.n�;n.r*- :^. O•��'' ��,'1!.'pS�jY _-;,•!f:��:
.F. -� %"i;:=.� �.F�•�,�-:P.EMIY' v:1�... .��`;+�,. �M �•, �.o`•:.i
••PF01��� `' o��•:.i - ;"`~. :` • 1 .�' _,+` . �J�.,\ :/ ' , s �r .c- �.�+
. .� _ _; •;- ;��;. •� ���(-� Trece �'�fr,. k�c.
= POV.d KZ� . -�t ��,� �`��_-.� � ::��•�� ' •. �, . > ; �� �.._• � � . �e� a
,�Y `•',;•'� . ' � , � � � �
� •.� �;.•.::,�..�.� ��r •+ ,.-,.�
�,. ... � y � - / '� - n;sai 'ti�►;f01 � �5c , _ . -
� '.',l/%; " � � _ .:. - .:.:' r�,"a�::J•'� _ ��� , � � POVIIKZ '� � ..
.n• ... _ , �� :� . :i �-." \. Yl - . ' Et�tIY ;".~��. . ..r.,
�. .,:::�� ..�,i i�; •: :_••�'! -,� "p�o�Y ,�: ��zX! . . ' .; 3 ' ��' :" � .u� , _�.
'':..� .. .�1.:.,:.E IY_I)�:__._• . ....�� _.. �.:1_. .:?:"s�' -�-----:�?FQ�Y„L`L ��`��Y.�:"o,``• ' � -
7971090 `4/2/98 ..
National Wetiands Inventory designations for the proposed F I G U R E
- development on SW Jefferson Street in Tigard, Oregon. (U.S. ?
Fish and Wildlife Service, Beaverton, Oregon, 7.5-minute J
quadrangle, 1:62500, based on 1981 color infrared photography). �SRI SHAPIRO/AGCO
� / INCORPOAATiD
�
SHAPIRO's investigation of soils, hydrology,and vegetation determined that potentially
- jurisdictional wetlands are present within the study area. The wetland boundary is shown
in Figure 4. The approxi.mately 11,200 square-foot(0.257-acre)wetland is located at the
lower end of a gradually sloping open field. Drain tiles appear to be present in the field,
which currently is mowed and planted with pasture grasses. Hydrophytic vegetation
indicators were fairly marginal in the eastern end of the field, arid the wetland
determination was based primarily on hydric soil indicators, and on hydrology indicators
which were more strongly present on the Apri125, 1997 site visit. Hydric soil indicators
observed included low chroma matrix and presence of redoximorphic features. Although
these i.ndicators were present in the nonwedand sample plots,there was a more significant
degree of mottling in the areas detemiined to be wetland.
- Wetland also was found to be present i.n the drainage channel located at the southeastem
boundary of the project site. The channel occurs offsite immediately southeast of the
property line. The channel is mostly baze of vegetation,but the banks are forested with .
deciduous trees and shrubs. The channel contai.ned approximately 2 to 3 inches of water
in a channel approximately 4 to 5 feet wide. The drainage may be associated with a
broader wetland azea which appears to continue offsite to the southeast of the project site. -
The NVJI mapping identifies a palustrine, open water, artificially flooded, internlittently
exposed/permanent,excavated (POWKZx)body of water approximately 0.25 mile
southwest of the project site. The on-site mapped wetlands most likely drain towazd this
�- NWI-mapped body of water;however,the offsite wetlands were not included in this
investigation.
No impacts to potentially jurisdictional wetlands on the property are proposed;however,
the City of Tigard Municipal Code requires that an undisturbed 25-foot�buffer be '
maintained between development on the site and the wetland boundary.
This wetland delineation represents the best professional judgment of SHAI'IRO but a
final jurisdictional decision can only be made by the COE and/or DSL. .
Wetland Determination a�rd Delineation for the S.W.Jefferson Srreet Property in Tigard, Oregon
Page-S-
Pf�Of��Y LINe
� � �--- � �--- �
�
• �
1 �
��
L .... � „r �
.._.� .... _��
�O•
�' ^ 2�
::14•:'•:. �4 ::.: �./
a :::�3�:� � NORTH
� ' ....
� .,:fii������:: 0 � 75 150
� —� �EET �
/
8� /
� �
/ � Potenttally �ur(sdictfonal
.:;� / wetlands
� g•::.
.
2 Sample e(te
Base ma from B en S rs 1997 7971090 4/2/98
, Potentially jurisdictional wetlands and sample sites for the FIGURE
proposed development on SW Jefferson Street in Tigard, Oregon. 4
�SRI/SHAPIRO /AGCO
T H C O R P O R A T L D
�
, � � . � . v�._..�
5.0 REFERENCES
Environmental Laboratory, 1987. Corps ofEngineers Wetland Delineation Manual,
Technical Report 4-87-1.
Reed,Porter B.,Jr., 1988. National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands:
Northwest(Reg-ion 9). Prepared by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, St.
Petersburg,Florida NERC-88/1837.
U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service, 1982. Soil Survey, Washington County Area,
Oregon.
U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service, 1989. Hydric Soils of I�ashington County Area,
— Oregon.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wedands Inventory maps (Beaverton, Oregon, �
� 1:24000, 1982, CIR aerial photography,overlaid on 7.5-minute USGS
quadrangle).
U.S. Geological Survey topographic map(Beaverton, Oregon, 1:2400Q, 7.5-mi.nute
� quadrangle, 1956,photorevised, 1970 and 1975).
Wetlarrd Determination and Delineation for the S.W.Je�''erson Street Property in Tigarc� Oregon
Page-6-
. : ' .. � . • � . , - .. • - _ . , ' _ ' � ' . ,:
. � . � . . . -� _. . .. ., r;..
, i'. . - � .. - . , . ' . . .�" . •" , . .. . '.1.� . . , .
. , _ j. ... ' . . . . • . . ..1... � . . .. _. ' . '
. . . . . ..' . . . .� ' • .. " .. . . .. . �
� � . .. ..
• . .:v .. :.)�' � . _ � ,"'- .
" ' . - � . - . * . � .
. - , . . ...
- . . ..� . . . . �..-
. _ . , '..
'
.� _ .._ - , - . • . ' • � • � Y-•-�-.
' . . • _ .:t �'" . . . �• .. .
Y'' . • . . � ,� - • '' , . . , �f . .. - • � ' . . . � � • . s••
, . , . ' . ` _y', . . : , . . ;;.;'.
� ` . ' � , � -
'y; . . . .' � • � �� • ' : . � .� ' F ! '
� � . � � � - APPendix ?,
- - � .. ��,.
� - �. � �: � � -� . - Wetland Delineation�Data Sheets .� r�'�� :
_:. . ., -� . : . . . -
� , .� , . �. . . , . .. .�. . . . . . .
� . .: _ '� . . . - � � -. �. . . .
. __ _ . „ .. . _ , . � ,,:::;..�
. - _ . . . . . : . . . . .� , . �. - ��,::F°-.;:
i• _ ' . _. � • ' ' � ' '. . -' . .. ' _ � � • .. ' ' , . - . • i,'
� ' ' ' • .. • � � • ' ' . : '. . _-,:�_�.':
. ' • . � . � ��ry. � _ ' .. - � � .. � � . ' . . �. � �
„ - , _ . . ' -. . .. . . .. � : . . .. . . .. '" . _ �r-.
. . ' . . . � . . �;L..:
.. . . ` . � � • ' . ` � . . . ' .t � . . � ' •' -. . } ;� ..
.. . . . � _ ' ' .. ' ' ' . .. � •' � . ' , ' . � � � .. . ., y -!
.. . . . . 'Y � , �. . . • . . . . ' . ' ' ' , . . . ,.. � ., � _ �. '.. C ` .tt•�.
• . . . • • ' . . .. . . ' � ' .. . . ' . ' . . ' . . . '. . ... . . .. . .. !�'.�
• .. • .. : � . . . , . � : - . • . . .. . . ' . ' .._�.. �rc.
- -• ' . .. . . . ' . - . - . , i •• . . . . _ ' 1 -
. . � .� - .. -. . '� • ,� . .• • ...s• _ ., ; • ' ''r .�.'.
- .. . , . . . . ' . � . ' .. ' .. _ .�� � - �' � ' ' • • • ' ' ' .� • :r�
• . . . . � ' . . � . . '. . . .. . � . � • . . • • . . . ' -.`` .
.. ' • : • ' . � .. � � .. . ' . . ' .• - _ � . . . . j .\�.
• ' ... . . . . ' . .. , . � _ . _ ' ' • , ' . . . . . . •ei: _
. ' . � ', 1� . � •L I- . � � • � � r . - • . . . . _ :�' �lv _
- • � . - • , : . . •. ' r -
_ , . , • ' • ' . . .. ' , . .f:
_ • . . . � � • . .. . . . :.' ;,
. . , . ' ' - • .' ' .. ' _ _ . - 't '�v..
. ", . � _ .. , . ' .. .. . . . r
, , . .
_ ,. .
' ' . , .. _ , ; : .. . . . :}+.
• . . ' � ' • . . . '_� : .. :-� . •• , . ' , '.
� ' ,- . .' .. . _ . ' . . �. . � �- � . - . , � :• . . .. . �= f,�� _-
.. _ . .. ; . . •. • . . _ '.' . . .. . � , � L . ... . � ' . • • � - '
WETI.,AND DET�ATION DATA SHEET - I987 MANUAL
Projcct #{:�?�1 o9p Sice:le.FkrSo►�, �rci' County:- bJasl�7q}� Srace: 02 Date:S�� �Ior. �
ApplicanVOwner: P6+�� MaY Sect��S_Townshi.p i S R.angcLt�l City• ► a+-d '
Plot Location: � • - -��
I O v�
TO�O�Id�7�11C Z.003C10II' �' �
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the si ? Y Fxplain:
Are soils vegetation�hydrology significantly dishu�ed? N Explain: 2 „ � a _
S �S� /z�
VEGETATTOIV
'�Dominan[ Plant S�ecies % Cover --� *Dominant Plant Spccics Covcr �
8erb Stratum - � total cover: �d a Shrub/Sapli.ng S�atum - � total cpver:
1._ Fc 5�'u ca r �r� � �� Ff}C t- 1.
2._ rblc�s lu�u-� a a F�r�" 2. �
3. 3 � �g�c s
4- �^ d� 4 �`F�GU 4. —'
5. i iU v J �AC 5.
6' Tre� Stracum - % total cover:
7. 1
8_ . . Z. �_
9. 3 —
Remarks: rY)dw e YGt S 5 E' Q!"� � �/Yv�i hG,�.i"
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL C�, vr FAC (excluding FAC-): Z � '�f,
Hydrophytic Vegetation Criterion Met? - NO , NWI Class
SOILS
Mapped unic name: �-�n�� Si(�- . I �vy� Matches Profilc? Y N
Taxonomy: Drainage Ci�s: C r( �{r ,'�P
Dcp[h Horizon Matrix Co or Mattle Abund., Size, Color, on Pores/Peds? Texture, S ct., Qther
0 _ �� 3 Z �-S�l2 3 4 � —��
�+ � � 1 �, �� �,�,�
« _ � � h� c '
4 _ !g + JO� Z 13 i-n 5��2 313 mo��lts CdYnvr�crr rviPol �i��� �G'Zl-r-i
Histosol Reducing Condi�ions (test) Hi. Organic Cont: Swrf. Layer
Histrc EDipedon Gley�d Organic Streal�'ttig
Sul[idic OcJ�r MottIed (w/i IO") Organic Pan
Prob, Aquic Moiscure Regime Conc�retiot�s (w/i 3", >2mrn) On Hydric SoiIs Lzst
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Criterion / Indicators Mec? NO
HI�DROLOGY � "
Depth of irrundation: ''
Depth to free water_ �g Depth to saturaaon_ 7�D Su� � ��
1° Indicator-s 2° Indicators-�Z�M� r°�+��E�---2° Tndicators �
Inundated �Oxidiud Raot Channels in upper 12" Loc,a1 SoiI Survey Data
Satura[ed in upper 12^ Water-stai.ned Ieavcs � FAC-Neutral Test
Wa[,er Iviarks Recottied Data AvaiIable (aerials, gauge) ? - Explain:
Drift Lines Other: �
Scdimenc Deposits Remazks:
Drainage PattCrla,s Wctiand HydroIogy Critarion / Indicacors Met? YES NO
DETERMIl�ig,'�ION: Is this plot n Wctland? YE,S NO
Commen�e:
Dc[ermined by:�, Lli M
wE�'T�I�.. DETE:RMII�fATTON DATA SHEET - 1987 MANUAL
Projcct �:��1?I�°�0 Site:le:Fkr o„ �r�c Couuty:_ IrJaSI�M,�}� Srace: o(� Date:.�7 '►,-
ApplicanVOwner: Pl��� /t/)�- Sect� S To�iv�n.ship I S Ra�cL_ Ci � �r��" Z
T !-
Plot I,ocation• na✓ ea fio� , ty�— �
Topographic I,ocation: }- �
I - Do Normal Circumstances exist on the scte7 Y N Exp
� Are soils vegetation� hydrology significaII.tly disturbed? N E,xplaia; ; �/e S s
I VEGETATION
i '�Dominant Piant Soecies Cover -',�nd._ *Dominant Plant Spccics Covcr �
Herb S�atum - � total cover: �D o Shrub/Sapling Stratam - % total cover:
I.�fDlaC�IGPr►S 1"Ao�irix�.. �0 #'��{ 1, �
2._�,eraniurri �u�c���Y�ian�m �.S _ I�PL 2. � — —
3. IC�s �in�i �1,�� 20 /�C 3.
�I S: V1 �� - /0 UPL 4. -----_.
rr n _�� AC 5.
6.__ �PS . G'i►'vnd i�a r e�. /a FAC- �'ree 5ccatti.m - % total cover: 1-
_ 7' 1.
9' ' 3. _ —,
Remarks: —
Pet�ent of Domina.nt Sgecics that are OBL, FAC or FAC (excluding FAC-): � � 33 0
Hydrophytic Vegetacion Cricerion tvlet? • YES �NO . NWI Class
SOIIS
Mapped unic name: ��a�G 51 ��' �L!7,lit�� Mat�hes Profile? Y N
Taxonomy: Drainage C1ass:Sornfwl�evf o�ir�s. a�r�iihe, '
Dcpth Horizon Matrix Co or M�t�le Abund., Size, Color, on Pores/Pcds? Tezture; Stnic�., O�her
� ��. /D 2 � Z S i l f �dZvf-�
1�-1 �iQ 2 7-S �l� �-l- Cl md7��tS i �m�n m ov� �� S'i �T �Cf7,liYVi �
Histosol Redvcing Condi�ions (test) Hi. Organic Cont: Surf. Layer
Histic Epipedon Gleyed Orge.nic Strea4;ing
Sulridic OJ�r Mottled (w/i 10") Or anic Pan
Prob. Aquic Moiscure Re e g
� Concretions (w/i 3", >2mm) On Hydric SoiIs L'zst
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Criterion / Indicators Mec? NO
HYDROLO GY �
�P�h of inundation: Depth to free water: ' ��S �� . �-
1° Indicators Dep[h to sacuracion-
2° Indicators--�ZoYrKacere�,,;.e��,2o Indicators
Inundated Oxidizcd Raot Channels in upper I2" Lacai Soil Survey Daca
Satur�ated in upper 12^ Water-stained Ieavcs FAC-Ncutral Test
Water Marks � Reco�rded Data Available (aerials, gauge) ? - Explain:
Drift Lines Other:
Scdiment Deposics Remazks: �i �- 5�� S ur
Drainage PauGrns Wctland Hydrology Crit�rion / Indicators Mec? Np
. DETERMLTI�s,TION1- �Is this plot a Wctland? YFS NO
::ommen�e: VPG��+C,t T1 UYt GLL�d � (Y/Lt�i�,i u, hc� 1�3'1�-
1�� �
Determi.ned bY•�� . LY (1�M
,
wET7_.A.I.J DETF:RMII�IATTON DATA SHEET - I987 MANUAL
P'raject'#:�1�1�l ogo Site•?e.FFcr�o,,, �-�r�c�' Caun . 4JaslnM
A.pplicanVOwner- P�+�� /VJQ,- �'�-----��� Stace: O(� ��Aate:� 7 �' �loc.
PIo t S��-.-'L�_Town.chi.p I S a n Pe_L City: T i a r,( �
Lo�stion: dyh p�l.
TopograQhic T�ocacion: / a S ccs e , .
Do Normal Circuznstances exist on the si Y N Explain:
At� soils vegetation hydrology significautly di:sturbed? N Explain:
VEGETATION
'�Dominant Plant So�ecies � � Cover -Ind. *Dominant P1ant Spccies Covcr �
Herb Stratum - � totaX coveC: � Shrub/Sapling Str�tum _ % total c ve
1._ ��i���.i�w� v�ats ov�.�; ° 1C:
2 .1�. �i� 1. 2 oGis�a lor .�_ v
3.
Z. �So� u a h� 30_ �
4 3-�p i rara de�� lA�,c: 6� �
5. - 4. �
5.
6" Tree Strantm - % total cover: - -'
7. '— .
8. . . 1-
2 '-----
. 9__�c �� 3 —
Remarks: � �a -� ,� �o� ` ----
Per�ent of Domiaant S � � �u��Oi ��" �
gecies that are OBL CVy, or FAC (excluding FAC-): � ,3 a
Hydrophytic Vegetation Criterion Met? I'E�S NO , �I� .
SOLLS
Mapped unic name:�}�a�� S i �� /6—�,yn Mat�hes Profile? Y N
Taxonomy: Drainage Class:S e dr r
D�pL ,� Horizon Matrix Color Mottle Abund., Size, Color, on Pores/Peds? h d'
/D� 3 Z Texture, S ct., Other
l!- !8-r�� _ s;l�- lcsz�,-, .
d�n Z 7-s ���2 � w,d���.r s,' l� /�r�
Histosoi Reducin Condi�ions test
Histic fioipedon Gle ed g � � �� �rg�c Con[: Surf_ Layer
SuI�idic: Ocl�r y R �rganic Streal;ing
MottIed (w/i 10 ) Organic Pan
Prob. Aquic Moistuz�e Regi.me Concretions (w/i 3", >2mm) On Hydric SoiIs X,zst
Remarks: �
- Hydric Soil Criterion / Indicacors Met? Np
A�_�,
T�-�crr�r,�..
n x�.�cvLV l�-Y
Depth of imindation:� Depth Co free water:� ��
1° Indicators a (� Depth to satttration_ �el� I 2 �'
2 Indicators-�Z�M� r�+recf�-2� Indicators
Inundated Oxidizcd Root Changels in upper 12" Loca1 Soil Survey Daca
►Saturated in upper 12^ 1�Water-stai.ned leavcs FAC-Neutrai Test
Water Marks Reco�ded Daca Available aerials � -
I]rift Lines � , gauge) . Explain:
Other:
Scdiment Deposics Remarks:
Drainage Pattcrns Wetland Hydrology Criterion / It�dica[ots Me[� �p
_ ur.1�KiVi11`�AT7C]N T t, � . ��
----- -- --- ._...� y,v� a wcuana! Y� �
:�:OmmenLe:
Determined by:�_ C (�
Projcct �:�J114�0 w���' il�E�xAT10I�t DATA SHEET - 1987 MANUAL
Site;_1e.FfcrS� �i'tc� County;. 4JaSl�Mq}p� S��e: o(� T�ate: 7 � Floc; �
ApplicanVOwner: Pl��� /VJQ,- � sect, S T�}�, I S Range �l City; , a,-,{ —
P l o t L o c a tion: � An o� h a � ov� b
Topographic Loca on: ev� l
_ Do Normal Circumstances e 'st on the site? N Iain:
Ate soils vegetatian�hydroTogy significantly distur{�ed? N Explain: r i �' rs
� VEGETA'I'ION
*Dominant Plant Soecies °� Cover -Ind. *Dominant Plant Spccics Covcr �
Herb Stratur�z - � totaX cover: Shtvb/Sapli.ng Strawm - °.� total cover_/d d
1. 1. G�iS old�-- � �
2' ' 2. OSa lt a k�� � ,� - ��
3- 3 �
4. � —.-�
6. 5' �
�'ree Stracum - % total coYer:_ ---
7. I .
9. • . . 2 ---_
Remarks: 3"
�'et�ent of Domina.nt Speci.es that are OBL, FA. , FAC (excluding FAC-): d = O %
Hydrophytic Vegetation Criterion Met? • YES NO ,
NWI Class
S OII.S
Mapped uruC name: A'D�(a Si/-,L /�CvYY1
Mat�hes Profiie? Y N.
. Taxonomy: Drainage Class:,.$o'YriPk,�,�,� ,/�doy� �
Dep[h Horizon Matrix Co or Mottle Ab nd., Size, Color, on Pores/Peds? � �r�h��
' �„ � /D 2 3 Z Tex/�, Stnict., Other
�7-S n�a�"�
�----- Z /o !2 4- �a � /' as�, rr�e v(. S'i /�- G'��i-r
Histosoi Reducing Conditions (test) Hi. Organic Cont: Surf. Layer
Histic Epipedon Gle ed
SulCidic Oclor y „ �cganic Streakit�
Mottled (w/i 10 ) Organic Pan
Prob. Aquic Moislu� Regime Concretiorns (w/i 3", >2mm) On Hydric SoiIs X.zst
Remarks:
� Hydric Soil Criterion / Indicators Met? p
iti i L2C V L V lr Y
I?epth of inundation: C ��
0
Depth to free wa�er: / �� Depth to saturation_SU r� 7�0 �'
1 Indicators 2° Indicators�Z oY rxht fc�s,,:ecf�--2� Tndicators �
Zn���d Oxidizcd Root Channels in u r 12"
Sa.turated in u ^ P� z-�1 SoiI Survey Daca
pger 12 Water-stained Ieaves FAGNeutrai Test
Wacer Marks Reco�ded Data Available (aerials, gauge) ? - Explain:
Drift Lines Other:
Scdiment Deposits Remarks:
Dirainage Pattcrns Wetland Hydrology Cricerion / I�dicacors Met YES NO
_ DET'LRM[3�IATZON: �Is,tFus p10 n W tland? YE,S NO
:ommen[.�_ \ 2 2f- �� �orr�in.�,�e� � C
Jetermined by: (,Y '°
R'E'I'LAl.J DETERMII�IATION DATA SHEE1 - 1987 MA3�IUAL
Projcct#:�1110gp �- --Site•1e.Ffcrso„ ��'tcf' County: bJa.S�in�q}� S�ace; 0(� Aate- �- �`
ApplicanVO '� �lot;
wuer: Pk�I Mm- Sec�._..�_ To hip 1 S Rangc_L City:_7'�y ard "1—
PIot I,acation: �a r fi � 5.�,�
Topographic I.ocation: dw s
_ Do NotmaI Circumsrances exist on the si ? Y Iain;
Ar� soils vegetatian hydrology significanfly disturbed? N Explain:
VEGETATION
*Dominant Plant Species � Cover --� *Dominant Plant Spccics, Covcr �
�erb Stratum - � cotaZ cove�.�_ Shrub/Sapling S�atum - � total cover: 2p
1._F�s��a �v1�►-a � FACG l.�os�, nu�-karra -� �"�
2.�D�CUS �UYf�I7u$ 2. _ bt�(.f O��Cdlr)✓' ��' �
3._Prn.c Qnnu� o f}C 3_
4.frP r'G n i V�'1 �cv�o I�n �G n w, � � ----
5. � L �'
5. —
6' �'ree S[ran�m - % total cover:______
__ 7. 1
9. 2'
Remarks: �� n -
3.
Percent of Dominant peci.cs t are OBL CV�, or FAC {excludi�ng FAC-): � /Qd ,
Hydrophytic Vegetacion Cri�erion Met? - NO . NWI Class
sou,s .
Mapped unic name: ��o h q 5��-� 16�,yy� Mat�ches Profil�? Y N
Taxonomy: Drainage C1ass:S6�Pwti c�,,
Dc th Horizon Matrix Co r M�t�le Abu d., Size Co1or, o Po es/peds? a '� � rQil�P�.
" L 'J Tcx[ure, S ct., Other
-- d „ � 2 3 Z- 7- S ' �-/ o rl e ��e /hP i'�►-�
$^,$-F 0 !Z 0 �f rrr o{� P� dYr��n n�P6l v n-,
Histosol Redvcin Conditions test
Hiatic E�ipedon Gle ed g � � �• �rganic Cont: Surf. Layer
SulGdic: Ocl�r y Organ.ic Streaking
Mottled (w/i 10") Organic Pan
Prob. Aquic Moisture Regime Concretions (w/i 3", >2mm) On Hydric Soils List
Remarks: C'oy�C► r�e fic►�,s wu �, Man �'v�,c� �, s / - a
Hydric Soil Criterion / Tndicaco Met? p
TT'trr�T i.
n t yt�c v LU Cr Y -
Depth of irntndation: q �� -7 ��
Depth to free water: � � p Depth to satvration_ / � Stir
1° Tndicators 2° Indicators�Zc�rrvaa�rc�,�;���^2o Tndicators � ,
Inuz�dated Oxidiud Root Channels in u r I2" Gh� /S- �g
Saturated in u r 12^ P� �1 SoiI Survey Data
PPe Water-stai.ned Ieavcs FAC-Neutral Test
Wacer Marks Recozded Data AvaiLable (aerials, gauge) ? - Explain:
Drih Lines Other.
Scdimenc Deposics Remazks:
Drainage PattCms WctIand Hydrology Criterion�/ Indicators Met Np
. DETERIKgIp� IONc �Is this plot a Wctland? YF,S NO
C�:ommenL�: Gc '�i I� w45 �j�t� u+ f�. ' �� � L� Z.r �
Determined by: F � M
wE'�'LA._ DETERMINATTON DATA SI�EE_ I987 MA3�IUAL �
. P�'rajcct�#:�1�IOgo ' Site:le.FlcrSo►., �rcf_ County: 4JaSl�Mq}� Scace: a/� - Date: 7 � �loc:�
pplicanVOwner: P►��I M�- ect��S_Townshi.p I S RangcLi�l City: r tiro(
Plot T..ocation: N �'►�t ea �ery, o,• 'o� " P '
To�ograph.ic I..ocacion: r e . t �
Do Normal Circumsta exist on the sitc? Y N Iain:
Ara soils vegetation� hydrology signifiaanily disturbed? N Facplain: e✓,' ,� o r -
�►L.e �e� , �
'YEGETA'I`ION
�`Dominan[ Piant S�ecies Cover -��d., * ominant Plant S ics Cvvcr j�
Her aatum - � tvs X caver: l�0 AC ShtvblSapling Stratum - � total cover:,��
� F �.
2.� ri I�Jw, P P,v�s ,�_ �F/9'C 2. . ..—__
3. a 'S / � �_ 3_ .—_
4- e 1 rG�c i !'a _� �'F�CI�I 4.
5. � ►'v Zo � 5.
6. c G �. � �` �tC�.t Tre� Stratum - % total cover:
�. el �a �,n�ed�a � �e �.
g- . z.
Remarks: 3.
Pet�ent of Dominant Specics that are O , CW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): � ,3 � /0 d ,
Hydrophytic Vegetacion Criterion Met • YES NO
� . • NWI Class
SOII,S
. Mapped unic name: 0�� Si�� �l��iyy� Matches Profilc? Y N
Taxonomy: Drainage C1�SS: SdMPi,.�j,a� ,po�,(y dra,1�P--
Dcp[h Horizon Matrix Color M�t�le Abund., S' , Color, on Pores/Peds?
Pd_Tcxcure, S[zuct., O�tte,
_ _) '� p 3 L � 7-S~/ +v��}PS CdYn n�oy, �
_"—""�� � 1� L� 4- 1'f'iD� �' aYnm ��w,
Histosoi Reducing Conditions {tes[) Hi. Organic Cont: Surf. Layer
Histic Epipedon � Gle ed Organic Strea�;iL-�g
SulGdic: aclar y � �
MottIed (w/i 10 ) Organic Pan
Prab. Aquic Moiscuze Regime Concretions (wli 3", >2mm) On Hydric Soils X,zst
Remar�.s: arr c re ' s i�'1�,�y,
Hydric Soil Criterion / Indica�ors Met? p
.,.
T1'Y��w w
nY1�KVLUtsY
� Depth of utundation: �� u
Depth to free wacer: �� Depth co sa[uration_�� Qn� ���
1° Indicat�rs ° Indicators-�zoYr+.azr�,,;���____2a Indicators
Inundatcd Oxidiud Root Char►ffels i.n upper I2" Local SoiI Suzvey Daca
Saturated in upper 12^ Water-stained lcavcs FAC-Neutral Test
Wacer Marks Recozded Data Available aerials � _
Drih Lines � , gauge) . Explain:
�ther:
Scdimenc Deposits Remarks: j 5 d-- /�',
Diainage PattCrns WetIand Hydrology Criterion l Indicators Met? YFS p
DETERA�LQIATILON: �Is this plot n Wctland7 yF,S , p
Commen��: P eT p�y� ry� M� �vt �H /J • M�c��J. . .
Determi.ned by: ��, (1 R,M
�,e
i G{GYvnsld�
�/LCR/1 .
-
Project #:�J1)0°Jp w��' �J DETERMINATI�N DATA SHEE� . 1987 MANUAL
Sice•1e.FhrSo,,, �'r��' County: 4Jas�iMq}� s��e: 02 Aate: 7 � �loc:�
ApplicanVOwner: Pl��� /V1m--�'�yd Secc, 3S�To�vn.ship l�_ ����1�_ City: i �rd
Plot L.o�ation: /�(v�' u .f '�,.� ' e -� Lfo a�s rh buvrrd �-ew� dra/na e cG,
To�ographic I,ocatiort: - � a c C� ,�n """�
Do Normal C�*t=�Tm�tattces exist on the site? N Explain:
Are soils vegetation hydrology signifcau,tly disturbed� N plain:
VEGETATION
*Dominant Piant Stxcies Cover -Ind. *Dom.inant Plant Spccics Covcr �
�erb S�atum - � total cover; /o Shrub/Sa pIi.n g S�a t a m - % t o t a l c a v ez�:
1. � �ic l�v,,�, rh u ��v vn �'U �AC(�t 1. Crzc,�P u s riv►v r[�t. Za ��9C(,
2.� ,�sfis �.,, 20 �- .9� 2. o�a lah _ ��C
3. 3_ m • � ur c�� f.
5. 4. S u s oGs o � � !��
6 s. �e �
'�'ree Stratum - % total coYer:_�o
_ 7' I.��X�ku.s �a
�' 1;a -/c�o �rcrti
s. � �
9. 3: —
Remarks:
Pet�ent of Domina,n[ Spccics that are OBL, FAC FAC (excluding FAC-): �. 33�Jo
Hydrophytic Vegetacion Cri�erion Met? • YES O . NWI Class
S017.S �
Mapped urti[ name:_A"jo �i $i�� ��� Macches Profile? Y j�I
Taxonomy: Drainage Class: PwR ' oorl d�ru, hP (
Dc th� Horizon Matrix C Ior M�t�le Abund., Size, Color, on Pores/Peds? Tcxtu�e S Ncc., Orher
� 3 1?c� wi d���P ;� �
Histosol Reducing Condi[ions (test) H.i. Organic Cont: Surf. Layer
Histic Epipedon Gleyed Org�nic Streaking
Sul�dic OcJ�r � � ii
MottIed (w/i 10 ) Organic Pan
Prab. Aquic Mois�ure Regime Concretion�s (w/i 3", >2mm) On Hydric Soils Lzst
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Criterion / Indicacors Met? YES p
fiYDROLO GY �
Depth of urundation: f �
Depth to free wacer: 1 � Depth [o sacuration.
1° Indicator;t 2° Indicators-aZ�M��0�+:�ecf�,--2� Indicators
Tnundatcd oxidiud Root Channels in upper 12" I_ocal Soil Survey Data
Saturate� in upper 12" Water-stained Ieavcs FAC-Neutral Test
Wacer Marlcs Recozded Data AvaiIable (aerials, gauge) ? - Explain:
Drift Lines Other:
Scdiment Deposics Remarks: ��I ►�o� f p- " • ►r
Drainage pattcrns Wct�and Hydrology C cerion / Indicacots Met? YES Np
. DETERI193�IATION: �Ts this plot a Wctland? YE,S NO
COmm�nLe:
Det�rmi.ned by:
wE':['I.�. � DETF:RMINATION DATA SHEI � I987 MANUAL
Projcct #_�1�10�0 Site:le.��crso�, �{rcf' County: Waslni,n^}� gta.ce; �(� Date: 7 � �lot:�
ApplicanVQwner. P4��� /VJm- Sec� ' S To�wnshi� I S Rangc.1�l City: i- ard
Plot Location: C Gi� �wtl�erh E, --
ToPQgra�hic I,ocation:��'ol-�.�la.�,� ,(�„� c..xt }a �Pu.s�- �low,-, s �
Do Normal ucumstances exist o�ctc�Y N F�plain.
Are soils� vegetation�hydrology significantly disturbed? N EXplain; � ,n�
ru 1 rl Yv%PS �—
VLGETATTON
*Dominant Piant S�ies Cover -Ind. '�Dominant Plant Spccics Covcr �
Herb Stratum - � tota� cove1; � Sh b/Sa gli.n Stiatam- � t o t a l c o v e r:/,S
I.�Jcvh /�,nn�5 � /iC 1._��uS �S�o%Y DD FAc
2._ ►-r1�-nKS Sfl 20 Fi4L I�t 2. �
3. i I i w� rtrP.v� ..�_ U pL 3_ ---
4- VI iu�r i ; U � _ I��'L 4. ' .�'' `-
6. 5-
�'ree S[ranzm - � tota! cover:
�' 1.
8.� . � � 2
9. 3 —
Remarks:
Pct�ent of Dominant Specics that are OBL, FAC , FAC (excluding FAC-): � 3 .— 3_ 3�,
Hydrophytic Vegetacion Cricerion Met? • YFS O . NWI Class
SOLLS
Mapped uni[ name:_�}�0�a s��� ��G�t
Mat�hes Profile? Y N
Taxonomy: Drainage Class:SornP,,�l,,,� oQ,,I �/�«;NPL
Dc th Horizon Matrix CoI r M�t�le Abu d., Size Color, on Pores/Pcds? Tex re, Struct., Och�
�`��� � /� 3 z v �2 �.3 mo�f-l�S S,•�f �
,� d`a�„
�18; �7, �--� �-j- o � S;� d.a�
Histosol Reducing Condicions (test) Hi. Organic Cont: Surf. Layer
Histic Eoipedon Gleyed Organic Streal�ing
Sul�idic O�or �MottI�d (w/i 10") Or anic Pan
Prob. Aquic Mois�ure Re e g
� Concretions (w/i 3". >2mm) On Hydric Soils Lzst
Remarks:
Hydric Soii Criterion / Tndicacors Met? p
HYDROLOGY � �
Depth of uiundation: '�
Dcpth to free water_ � Depth to saturaaon_
1° Indicators 2° Tndicators--�jZ�M�r�+recf�---2� Indicators ^
Inundated Oxidizcd Root Channels in upper 12" Local SoiI Survey Daca
Saturated in upper 12^ y�ater-stsined leavcs FAC-Neutrai Test
Water Marks Reco�t�dcd Data Available (aerials, gauge) ? - Explain:
Drift Lines Other:
Scdimenc Deposics Remazks: ; � y�
Drainage Pattcrns Wetland Hydrology CritE on ! Indicators Met? �p
_ DETERA�IATION- �Ts this p1 t n Wctlan ? YES p
CommenLe: e G�lpy) �yt.� dyo�a " _� -f �p�
Determined by:
wE'ii�.AI� DETERMLNATION' DA�'A SHEE7 1987 MANUAL
Prajcct r�:��14�0 Site•TeFFcrSon �'{cf' County:_ 4JaS�i�q}� S�.te:--0/� Aate: 7 �' Plo
Applir.anVO /VJa,- '`� t:.�_
wuer: P�,� Sec� �Towns I S gangc,L_
Plot I.ocat�on: � - „f.� o # Cih'' i aro(
Topagraphic I.ocatioa: l�a � a�- r'� d �
Do Nnrmal Circurnstanrces exist on the site7 Y N Ezpla_in:
Are soils vegetatian� hydrology SlgIIlf CS.trCly d]S�lII�Cd7 N Explain: rQ;�a .e a�a
'f7 Pa( e��
VEGETAT`IOiV
�`Aominant Plant Soecies � Cover -Ind. *Domi.nant Plaat Spccics Covcr �
�erb Stiatum - � total covec: � _ Shrub/Sapling S�atum - °� total cover:.S�
I.�;lob���-r, wufsa�.•.; �l�o FA[�W- 1.�udUs dis�a l q�--
3. � 2.f7u Xi o Ir -SeP�li'n �Z O� F-1�
3_ ,�'o a `�C�
4. — � /'l K� a n a -�� �?C,
6. 5- �—
�'ree Stratum - % total coYer:
7. 1
9. 2' — -__
3.
Remarks: � —
1'et�ent of Dom� t Sgecics t are OB , W, or FAC (excluding FAC-): = 7,S�Ja
Hydrophytic Vegetation Criterion Met? YF�S O . NWT Class
SOIIS I
Mapped unic name:/�"Ic�N A S;1�- ���yy Mat�ches Profite? Y N
Taxonomy: Dra.inage Ciass:So>r�w�,� oo.� o�ru�,ye�
Dcpth Hor[zon Matrix Co or Mottle Abund., Si2e. Color, on Pores/Peds? Tex[ure, S cc., Other
-�8�� 3 I maf�les /�-t '' 7-SY/I �� Si�� ��G�yt
Histosol Reducing Conditions (test) Hi. Organic Cont: Surf. Layer
Histic Egipe.don Gleyed Organic Strea'.:uZg
ScclCdic Ocl�r Motticd (w/i 10") Organic Pan
Prob. Aquic Moisture Regime Concre[ions (w/i 3", >2mm) On Hydric Soils T.,ist
Remarics;
Hydric Svil Criterion / Indicators Met? YE,S 'p
T,t n.r.
nz1�KVLUCTY
Depth of inundadon: 1� 1
Depth to free wacer: ' � g Dep[h to saCUrauon_ /� Su ���„
1° Irxiicators 2° Indicators-�ZaYr+�n2ro;�,,,:e��_2° Indicators
Inur�dated Oxid'tud Root Channels in upper 12" Lacal SoiI Survey Data
Satuzated in upper 12^ �Water-stained Ieavcs FAC-Neut�ai Test
Wacer Marks Recozded Daca Available (aerials, gauge) ? - Explain:
— Drift Lines Other:
Scdiment Degosits Remarks:
�.Drainage PattCrns Wctland Hydrology Criterion / Indicators Met? YES p
, DETERI\•LI?�Z,e,TION: L9 tbis piot a Wcttand? NO
":ommen��:
Jctermi.ned bY: `�
P
�..
_ ; � I ; , ► �-----------; LL�C Jo� ���� . ,
• � � � � � � r� sos � Exhibit F
• . i � ---T-1._----- - � I
� cn � �------ ------------� �
TL 100 � I � TL 901 � TL 1000 .� � I
� i I ;�' r� eoo ; �
� ,
; ( i . i /� i �---------�' O �
� i � � , i � ' �_'��__ � . � .
----------� � _ ._.__J_._ _ ,,;.� � ( �
APLE STREET
.— _ - o
TL 1001 TL 1301 TRACT pA�
o r m
LL W O I
� W O
I r'_�..�:' O � I�
'_-_-_-__-� \ J � y Ql
I I . Parcel i j: -�.\ � a N
I I � �� %• �M ? •\ ��� �� ����� ���� � a -aa � n
I I `� / . '/��. •.�.•.' 1 �} � � y F i
�
I � � � :'��.'. . ' ' � o � v
. .
. .
i • ;°
•. . . . .
.
TL 100 j I ------- Parce! 2 `� �.:'.___..._,`.'�..�.' _ -- - ... .... _ RAWfNGS ,� c°� � a �
.-J � s
, • j :_..... • „ � z
� �--- :. . . . . . . �.".•� Q,'� �_`-'-F --- _, ,` RAWINGS �
. . • .
� �...:T
I : .;' _'.',','../ .{;.�' .11 _ !..:..�....�..!.
� r _;�� - 1 COVER/lNDEX OF D
I
I . � �� ' - 2 PRELIMINARY PLAT �
� - I �'�`._. . . ,- O!� _. ; ...
.. . . .' ... _:_:_... ..:_�;w, _
I , . , . .. ., w
� TL 1002 ,.•�. . • • �-:.. .'/ � ---- I._.�� :-: N�~ � ~� a ! ` I .. 4 PRELlM�NARYUTLITYPCAN
, I .. . . . . . ���-� 1` `. =.�...,;�..:_ :� ,�: .I....�..____
I � . .•�•�-�•���''� (�L�G /� � ` �� f 1..-. --- � `.j w,�aw ��°� 5 ON-SITE/ OFF-S11L� ANALYSIS 0 ¢ c°�
�.�� i :� �--
i . . _ o , , n ��,. � ,�_....._ o � �
. , : ,.. . _
. � —
�:�.: � I--------.-- .; -- pQ'---- : .... .- � r� M o
,-L�;
� � —i! :6:...N �'
j I- TL 1101 ''�). �P`�� i�/ ' � .�.---� ��:"'°°`�' �-�'- � � � O N a
.�° _ _
__ '
..
. .
i ...... _... ..� _ �. � a �
„i i `� O�(�0 /� � ,__, ,y �������, _�.. �i � � x o
� :� O � � � _ :,.:::,���r;• .., I a
. i .. "�- '
i � � ,-,• P�P� �,� SITE ���w� ..��;";���� ~ �
---- -------- - I... , ... w
------ �� N�.
i r r---- . �, � . , ;.\:� ., ._, . ... _ ---- � N
. . .
i � � TL 401 � i �,.......;_.� ,%;! ;�:._j i...��.-�� _
� � TL 1102 I TL 1100 i i SCALE.• l"=40' � � , i�! ;�! j : �....-� °'"`
� i i { '-` - � _i
I � � i � TL 1200 �.,;w ;.. . ' - �
li }i� M ��- : �i�; - _ - c�
� � ���y , �
;�._: ,� � __ . , � z
, . . �--
� w �
�- �"L� Q
VlCINITY PLAN (NTS) � o
� �
� o
51TE DATA
U w
APPLICANT: FWEVIEW FARM, LLC PACIFIC CREST PARTNERS � � �
� z
15500 SW JAY STREET 1430 EASTSIDE ROAD
BEAVERTON, OREGON 97006 HOODRIVER, OREGON 97031 ,
TELEPHONE: (503) 641-7342 TELEPHONE: (541) 386-6333 I
PROP05AL: 2-LOT PARTITION
�
ZONING: R-4.5 a
51ZE: 1.T�0 ACF'" �
TOPOGRAPHY: FIELC .UC DESIGN GROUP, INC. i Y
�
�
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: �30i, TAX MAP 151-35AA �
TIGARD, OR
;
STORM & � ,
o';�•�a•.�
_�,a...
SANITARY SEWER: C�TY OF TIGARD � x��;<' ':�::Design
WATER: TUALATIN VA�LEY WATER DISTRICT
`;:` ...`:.Grou
.�,:A,.•
ELECTR I C: P.G.E. Plannas
Engineers
TELEPHONE: G.T.E. S�'��
aaoo Kw.nin+teRa�cE
FIRE: TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE I
NLLSBOR0.aREGON onx�
PF10NE(567)l56�-�2�I
i F�(50.3)6�5—b500
.lecd�1qn.eom
o re
7009
OU�aC MD.
^ �
— 0J
_ —__ L — _._ - _ _ _
- i � I ' I
. � ' • � � -------�
I �--------� � f------- � w I
I � T L 9 0 4 � � � T L 8 0 4 � w�
� I � - - - - ---- ---
I I I � j I I � I �
I I � I I I O I
I w I ----� I
r-----
� � �_------ ----- -� cn
I I � � � � � TL 600 �
� w � ---�— I � w I / �
------
I > I —1 -------- TL 805 � � I / �Wg
� Q � � �-- - -1 � � I � �� � o��
� �yoi
� _ � TL 902 � TL 905 � � � / � _<o�
� a�z
� � � � � r--- ----- ----i � I // W c~i���
1
I � I I � � I � / � w z°�aM
� � I TL 806 � I / � � � ��m�
I
v� I �--------- -------- ----� � I � �
TL 100 � I � TL 901 TL 1000 i I I ��
� � / TL 800 ) � o
� � / y� o � aW
I I � �-------- ----� r°� n o
I � / / � ~
� � � , o
� I � / n¢_, oy <
: /
—� � � � � / ~ X � F
---- -------
------- -- ...- - - ... I �---- O �
1APLE STREET � J ~ ` �
N � �
N 105� �, 1 S9' � �
too' S� �� TL 1301 TRACT '�A�� TL 590
----------� � TL 1001 ���`.._.._. 3i,094 sq.tt.
� � �� 61' Porcel 1 t +. ` . �—.`�o.�� a�res
� � � Net: 8,933 sq.ft. �� ..��.. . �.f � .� �
� � i` Gross: 17,297 sq.ft. 1,LO ' • M '� ` : � ` �. a
� � so. � �' . . . "�.�-. . ` � r
I I \ � �.. ` . � . . . + . . � . W . �
� . . . � a
� I �
c'n '.. . . . . .�..7, z
TL 100 � �— ------- � Parcel 2 \ ,�-` -` . � . ` � ` . +j� �: -;..� � �
W
� �
i I 10,094 sq.ft. �y �.'. �og� . � . �. �.�.,� .��..i Q' F a
� . . � �
� I '1 ,..�•�'�- � - � � W -� � Y � �� � I
� � TL 1002 ti ,. . . � . ` . +,...,� J.. ,yh '� � — ———
.L
I I � /� ��� � v I � �\� // �---------------
�y , . .. �.� � I
j � I---------- 43' a2� . . . �r ;� __ �P�--�� j �
i
I � vt P�\•� // I �
� I TL 1101 ' �. � i � �
i � �.1 ��C,� �i� � � �
I � � � -� ��� �� I
I � — ————— V ` � Q��P �/ j T jv'+Design
— / ld/V Grou
i r--------- �------- . � i -�
� j TL 1102 I TL 1100 � TL 401 �� ; E��
. � ( / / . �� surveyors
� I I / / TL 1200 � �d anoa Kw.znn�mte�cc
II I I I . � HLLSBQtO.ORECW i71II�
. I I I /� /� I = f��50�6a�-5 OOu
JCcAufqn.tam
� � I // // � GRAPHIC SCALE °�oos
I �
I � i i �----- • . „ ,. .. ,„ .�..�
— ------J L----------------� �---- -- -- ----------
---
_ i i
. . i-------- -------------�---- c�n��
----- ------------
----
— -----� i--- /� / i--- i I 1�_ � n
� i
°s
� ' I �J I I
! \ I/ I , ! 1 1 t � I Z �
I : : ; �
� 1 I
� � : : � q•----�........----- ......._ i � 0 1
� ��� 1 1...�----'--.......-----_._ ' � � ' � •----...........-----........_a
I �
zI i_.....-----...........____.....� i ......_--; i :.........--------......._----.....'.. i � I ; TL
� � >� ---....�..._.--
� � �+......-----..._.......__ � '-- ..........____.._...._.......__}_.........: TI� 805 � i � i
I' '��¢ �r m � � � ' : . ; � ' i
� � I � � TL902 i , TL905 : ; . . , ,
� .........___. __.. __.......;..._---�---......-----........__ i
li C�-�' �--t��•----.......,-------........a_'_....-�-- �-----� ' : ........__ ...__ , i
� : i.. �... i i � �
J n'Cfi � /1..� � l , i � j ' � ' E 1 � � I � �rn
V
Jf � � I ^`` . � � I i----........... _.......... . TL 806 i � -� N�
� .- �- ..: ��.. x� : � • ' ' � I � � �"��
r ' _�_ ..i . : <
r .........t
_� �J / r :�i~'c -T \� / : : � • : � ; � � � � �zi
TL 100 i � �/ `J 7L 901 i �� ��� �OOO,��h: ,�� , i i i i � � �� LEG�ND , s ��°
_ � \���ll-� -, � � / / ' � " ' X 'TL 800 � � , � 1 ; ,' _ ___ Z �a o
; Jr--- 'I I/ � / i , � : i � � i°m�
� � � � � � . • �__ ` .....------ .........__ �/ � --178- EXISTING 1' CONTOUR
- � �� "� � � I� I � ` ` ' -%
� O � ; � /r� �\ � ; /� i � � ' � �i � ,� � --180� - EXISi1NG 5' CONTOUR
� � T �,� � � � %/ i'i�� x I i I i �� i �> SURFACE FLOW Z
` � : : : • ......----....---•---___..........-- �
� 1 � � -�.._ ..���--......�__' � .
�� �./�i.....____. �� ........__._._..... • � ��. i z
----------
-------L� n r�:- --r-........._ _�....�..�....�--• ` �, � � � , � Jr n� �--------- EXISTING OECIDUDUS TREES � o � �
�' � >...1. ----.\,.._,._J.._..r..-�----_.....: .� � l � � �r r \ . � � n o
SW MAPLE STREET �`� � � `' < ,.- '� � � � J — � � ' �
- � �_ � /� . � � � / ^ '� EXISTING EVREGREEN TREES Q t- y °�
v,,. . . ;<v..,: � J Q F
� � � / ;�}a.; � —:ia;.;. :?<;;"C•;-%�� .���`,J J� —� .�� �� � /r � — � I> >i `/� /,' a O �
_ .
. .: Y .
. : ,.,. ..
_` .. ;.... � � T3,p f -- T R ��- - ,' o x � ,�
/ �
------- �- � r �, �---..... ...-.-.--..........__ ; TL .....�.---_;.. ..�fiFF�Ri_�.�.,-:�::.- ���� � � X o
��� ,
------- � +�� : TL 100j� / - — ; � /;� . � �
I �' � ; � / ` / � / , ! %.• 1 �:. �� f� � a
� � � � / ,� � PQr��9� � � /' � i r � � �.. ~ �
, �+
i i / ( i � , ' � . . .%:; �`.�t // :` �¢
';- 1 � � � � � ' �/ /' , i : , � — �'�. ./ :; �:/ ,. — -� / � '
� _�_ ' �� ; �� �%„' % , `�.-�'��/ � � �
�- � �� � � ' � i i � �'/ i•:"��.. W j.. . ' .%.. . �
- T � I `- I f � / {�. � y ,/� . ' .�`�.! .�` .�_�..:,1 `„ ' �' //� �:', i
F +� ♦ + I /
—� � � .
L 100 — —L �� _ � — �: � ` � � `. .
T � � ��-�-�---...:._�_�X P�r'cel 2� � � :. . Y � . .,, �--r �
I �f -�� • � ' / ,l � ' ,r . � r .t�.�,, . �� ,� a
!I� 7 � / % � i . .�'�O`'. ` . ` ;" i.:� /S� '}'� y �� G `►_ ,�
�� �� � � �/ j � � ! ' �/� !'� �� �x� %+� �.` y�` " �t'"�,I �� ` /� o
'�— --�"--..---J—� �`T�� �'1�' . i �' � �
_......... '..
i 1 �...._---r-......_�--...... / % �`� �;./ ..: �.l. . ��.;' „ � j •' o
I i�i� � � � / ' TL 1002 � � _ 1� i �?`-' ; ``�?�`i '` ` °�.�1-$5--- ��j� �� .r------------------- �
r �. � . � -�
� � , �- , .� �` „/,�z_..:...- _..�:. , G ,,
I � � � / : � � . :t: / � �� � i �
� J / �:
�
- . : �
� i �1 i / . � -:-j: � �.._...� / �
i� � � � J i � V.� ` ` :.. : '� / � �
� .: � � , / Q �
� ��� / � /�. � �� ' �
� �� i......------......._..----.......... ..� .y.- �P-------� :
/ i � I i .........� � �- //� . ?
.........----� �- .: �, �- �j� �� ,
� I�\ �� i......--.._._. � ' t / r P\ � ,
� � � `��. ..� � ,'� . �
/ � � � TL 1101 .I �, �_r ��//O �� a
�* . i ; -� ' ����' �� : �
i � � i � : � � � ; ��� � .
� I � ; : . .' � �
� i-�-� �-�---_..........----__.......�
----......._---..............._� . . �.: , i 2
i � �% � � � � V,.. /7( / � 1
: �
I : � � � ��
�
i ,� �J : � . , ; :
._.-------......---�- ---�� :
�......----�-----�---------.....-�,-----...-- - . , � ��P ,� ; �
, �
i � � � � � / � � '� �
i � I � i _TL 1102 ; TL 1100 + 401 �, ,
�� � - .
, ' ;
� ........----�---......
i � i
---.......-------..........-----
i 1 �'� i � j�� ,�� TL �1200 4.�-::-::....Design
� �:�Grou
�/ V I ( � / �/ � � '.�'"b�f°•%.V q
� �� � � i 7 ��' ��� i i p�azuur9
� � 1 I � : ,�" �i� � � Engineas
. Y 1 '� � J � � :� �i I � Stttveyors
. . : �
I.f / ' :- • ---------
" L______________________ _•_________ p
----------J I L-----------------i--------y / . „
__�_____ i =
� r«.uaata oRCaon cn2a
� i vxowEt�asa-axx
, / __r___________�____ __ fA%:(50])645—SS00
/
--------- fz-----------�-- ---T----
------------�--�— ...�e�a.,p�.�
� ------ / �� '// I
----------------� �-
�� � � 1 GRAPHIC SCALE ��j009
� .i . � f � �. �m .�,.�
- I R raT) �
i�n�n- ao n
`�5
i � i i � i i i , �
- � ExisnNC � i � � i �
• - i ' i i i �
� cuRe � � i i r----------------------� F- � i
i (TYP.) ; i---------------i I 1 1 W �
J ; i i TL 904 i i � TL 804 i Lv ( �
------ i
i -r�-EXISTING j I I i � � f------ LEGEND
� I � EDGE OF I � � � (n j xsc--l�i• cwrnNO wuma��sraau s�n
� � PAVE�AENT � I I I I � .om� PROPOSED NAIOIqE r[STOW1 XNFA
I I � ���� � � � � Z � ...........,��-.........E:: oasrnc w�r t srora�R
� --- �
� 1.' I J ' � r-_---------- , � � � I � E70571NG fYE MYORAHT
�.I
i�� Z � i � �----------------------� i TL 60 ''�
PNOPOSED flRE FIYDItANT
�� ' � I � •°-•-----�• �
i I � 1 ������{�-______�__L._�, � T� 8 0 5 i � I .. -..Y............. E10511N0 WAIER LNE ly~j O ��
��.� .,.� UTILJTY I --------------------i I � I FNOPOSm WATER 11NE � w o
EXISTING STORM �: �l�! � POLE �
ORAIN LINE (TYP.) �E ' I � ) � j � � I � """"......�x............ NNRE WATER IJNE J u'�cv
, � TYP. I I � 1 ---[.:••• cwsnNC vavF�eax � e o n
� r� �� i TL 902 , TL 905 � , � i �--. oaa�m�w�r Bax � .,Z�
� f� � r-------------------1 I �ol
I� � � hi� I � � � � I ....a... ElOS11NG REDUCER W tn�v
�; �✓� � � � I � I � / � PROPOSFD REpUCEtt y S �>^
�: ' i i � � TL 806 ; i ; ---. PflOPDSm B(pNOfF � � �m°
�:
EXISTiNG SANITARY K' • �-------------- � --�-------- --�_ �� ^
` --------------� I � / w�hrt gRHCc
SE W E R LIN E (T Y P.) � T ,' � ---- I � I /
�, ' I I � / —Qo a.EU�our
TL 100 �;.,,� �, w. ; TL 901 I TL 1000 / i i i i i �' �r;., �M,n.«E
�_�`'� I � I
��'��T � i I � TL 800 i � --_.,�,.___.....___�.
I / !t nasnHC wuaaa r sevEa Z
7 J� I i / � // i � � �� GRaPOSED YNIHOIF k SENER O �
EXISTING WALK (TYP.) j? ' r� I a �
' � ' � O u� �
�1 : � � ' �-----------------� l� � M r� o
: N ''-"�I i .` , � %/ / /�// a ~ � 6
�� I � / � a O �
�,, i I .� � ( / � i-- J < �
--JI ' I � �' � � / ��----------- 0 ¢ � �
--------------- . �
: ct� ,� r----- —•--- --......�..��'� ! I
SW MAPLE STREE7 ;, �x�: i ."�� ' ' % N ~ � �
.�. 1 1 i G c�
_ — ��,, � i �
�;
�x�� : � TL 1301 25' TRACT "A"
' °' TL 1001 �� eu � -„
F R� •� ��_.
----------------- �. i I I � ��` � r,� - _ '
�-...
�� � W^� Parcel 1 � � `�� '
� i ;. .y /. . .. �••� :. ,
SERNCE
I I I I I � ```� ``�� � + + . � ..j� , �,.\
I; I � � !
I: tn sa: � I �� `�� � %,� �y �,` '; '. Z
� � v� ..� • . �Q
I I I 15' M10E SANITARY ,:-{�:'� �� �� 15'WIOE STORM / ��,.� r .�. W �-•' .` . � � Q a
�� � SEWER EASEAIENT :;a�'� ��` ���SENER EASEAIENT �� �-'.y'�� �, �, �, �, �,, � � !
�c ? � I ♦� ♦� / . . . . . . .. .. . j ��
�� I i :, L--------------�------ I �� `•� , .� �+ . � .• . •.W �r.._...�. �. �,Jj�
TL 100 i� v� } ---- -� Parcel 2 ��., '�. � � . � . . . ; ;` .` %� � a�
IR r----------- �` ., . . . . .� "�
� � � 10'VADE SANITARY J - � a a Y+ �.r �+ ���, �NP
� SEWER FJ�SEMENT RIP-RAP ',,,,�0��, % �'� V� �
li � . `. a � a a . 0� i
' � �G,�`JtT. W' �' . . . . .�� �
: / `�
i: ; L:
x.;.� .
i; �.� i TL 1002 ,, F.�,;; .. . . . � +. ,� ----------------------
, , .: . . . . ...,;' G� ,1
� I i / � . . . . .:� � i
�: I , .. � . r.-,."" �� i I
: I ' .%: + � . .. �: � I �
�' ,°� � �•i,�, .. .�:' � �� � a
,I : �________________ .; ___ �P____�, ,
�1 � � � : � . ' �
r�;
i ��. \� �' i
� Ni i TL 1101 ` ! �P �'� i �
i I i ` ��1 �O ,' i �
��`� � I i . � Q� �' i �
�� i � ,' i
i:
i i i - � � Q,� �,' � ,,�.,_<.<_.
� y, ' ...
� ,.:.:� .
i ` . � i ,.;:.. : Des' n
i ( ,<:: ;,�.< tg
. �----------------- ---------- � P , , f
I. r----------- � �„�
��. ; I I i �
'v:.-::;� c
�� ' � � TL 401 ,'� i
� �' s� ; TL 1102 i TL 1100 ,' . i P���
Engineers
�� I I � � Siuveyors
�� � � � �� �� TL 1200 � z saoo N.w.xnm mw�r�
��S I 1 �� �� I � wuseat4 attoan on2a
il : ' � � i� ,�� � = rru�(so�cs ss-�soo�
�I y I EXISTING I i � I �����
�: �FIRE HYDRANT � � � I
• � � I I i� � o.d
� I I �� i� � GRAPHIC SCALE 7009
� I r�e
I --___L________y t________________________________L--______
-----------------� �------------ � � » r .. ,�.
� � �
. -- i �
' ---=-------------
�� -�------------�`�------------r------ r------ (rti�rer)
------------
` --------------- � ��--------- i� .� � � � i�n- ao m �,
� 5
1 .1 �p�
" —=---------------------
----------------- -
1 ----------- —
� I SW LOCUST STREET
�. _ - - - --�- - - - -
� \ I
r---------'
— -- —
--------- ��
� r----------� r..�---- �— -t-- � �` .
, TL 203; TL 2D4 I j ' 1L 903 i TL �DO i 'fL 802 � n 803 \� � I O
� � I
I j ~ � I �
� � LEGEND
� � I I � � 1 � I �
j � aRe c ' l j � I F-------------J L►� I I /, w°o
� I (TMV.) I F---------� � I � � W 1/ c� n
� � � j � � � / � O SOIL CLASSIFlCATION NUTABER � �rn
__-J � TL 9O4 � � � I TL 8O4 �� � � tn�N
� � r �oos,s,a � � � i � � r------------- �}o,r
I I '� �j I ' ��pr j � � // I Z I � SOIL SEPERATION LINE � 3 zo�
` I / F----------� / 1 � � W N��
I I , > I � L_>`---------1 TL 6o i o
---.�------J : a P / I � � � I / - -�9�� � EXISTING 10' CONTOUR p W �an
,
.11:T�q ��-f � ----1 1L 805 /� � �� � i � � � �n m v°�
" --
O4STWC STOfW��;1--'" I P� � 1 I LL .
°�"""���'� '�� I I `�90��,, � TL 905 I � � W � � ORAINAGE FLOW DIRECTiON
C -
;rn r� • .. r i �-----------i � � i
i�,
-� �
� � r � � f~ / ��~ � _ __ � � ___J ` � Tl 806 j j T1 e EXISTING OECIDUOUS TREE Z
�,�n ur��(rn j � °�°� -�- -� � � I � � Z < �
'L�0� � � TL 100 f�; � g01 � Q TL 1000 � � � � / � � EXISTING EVERGREEN TREE � O � �
J I � �
oasTwc wwc(r+r.) � ' e ` T _ P�ac� I�o L- ----y� ��/ I Q � y �
` a / � �
� � i i
. f r � 8 �-'--� � � i � °- � a �
--------- : I I /�I' �
,. , J _—____�----_
SW MAPLE � � � �. r-------- - -i o X � �
. '::° I --- aasnNC w�u(ttv.�/L_J — / r � N ~ ~ 1—
I
--STREET_ �: I IB r� � �/_.: n iaoi e e � Q'� TL 590 i � '
, r-: -:- � �
j ` i
E7C5T. � / � E70ST. l� •'I'�'�, O`( - I
1 � I � NaUSE J BNIDNG �� i. •�f ��•� I
1 �: .r — �� � (ro eE REYOK�) / '/� :ti 1• ; r_`� i N .
♦ � • � (�V' U7
� � '.� r ' � \ �� �• .r-..;,�,�� C � J
�P n ,00 ,; � ..� �:•'' e Pp ' Z
� � � \`r�� 1 ' 'i (::'' O i a
i: ��i 8 '�-'.'.:j' Pv� ; �
/ _w I � � � 1L 1�02 EbsnNe •�'� ...:` � -------------------------------1 Vi
� r : I (1�"ir�j � '�'� �.`i Q l � �
: ,- . . .'��.- .
/ � I � « � : . . . : � � 1 �
I `'}------ �
� I: I ---- .�� -- -O-� � j
.�
// 22 � L � I i � r� �,0,1� '1. B Q,OP� i i � N
•.� i
// � �. . i 22 ;.:� ' i � o
:
i; I' I i
� ��O v ii : � . . _ „ i i �'`'*a �
�'� ?�� i � r--------- ---------- . �. •�.,� I ± �
� , � iI� � � i r� iioz i n �ioo � n. ao� i i I
� I„I : I � � �� TL 1200 I I C
I� � � �� I I �„`o- ,��'� a
-- � F I .t� { �� � � � �
�I R�I � �
�------ii J-----
------------------
........---------- � --------- i i I SOLAR
----_.........---.... .
-----r--- �
------�— ------- ------r--------- — DIAGRAM �
—�—•--......_---........-•---------- �� �r----- � ,� I I � " �
...— \♦ 3203 i� �� � � � � �
�� ' ' azoo ��� /� � i � TL 3707 � e �GRAPHIC SCAL� � �
� i TL 3900 TL 3800
�i �� �i� �i� �i i I � �
�� �i� ��� 3902 � j I (nr pEer) - ..
� i i
3205 `�� ��� ��� �` � J902 � � � I i�uen- sa it A::::>, D2S1 ri
\\ �� �� � �� ��/ I I � ��
� i� i� . / i i I � :-.
\ ' \ � ' ' ' ' ... G
��` %��� ��� / ��� ��� i i i � 1 Planntrs
' - . ' ' o � �o SOIL LEGEND s ry Y�
' ,�� '� saaa w.w.anm ican,�cc
• MLLSBdiO.ORECON 971Pa
SOIL LIMITING DEPTH TO SEASONAL/APPARENT DEPTH TO DEPTH TO �orx:�so.n asa-uu
�,E DE�CRIPTION x SLOPE FEATURES WATER 1'ABLE BEDROCK FRAGIPAN FA%:(50.7)615-5500
....iaw�+,q�.00..�
_. 1 ALOHA SILT �OAM 0-39. WATER 1.5-2.0 ft PERCHED > 60 in. NONE USiED °"�
- 7009
22 HUBERIY SILT LOAM 0-37. WAiER 0-1.5 ft. PERCHED > 60 in. NONE US7E0 `�'"'
, -- � SOURCE: ME7R0'S RUS UlE DATABASE AND TNE SqL CONSERVA110N SFRVICE SOIL SURVEY OF WASHING�ON COUNTY, JULY, 1982. �
�5
I i I �-- . ,
� � r�x�oT r�x ior I
I 1 i �z 903 TAX LOT
I 1 I eo5
� � ; r-- P�-2. _ �
� ,� � �--�-�= -- - - ---- � o
p I 1 I _�-_' �-- T' O�K-14 � TA%LOT I ��
o I ' . ( ����____' — � Q'
N I 1 'I � I . � �j I JURE-1B B06 I �w
� I 1 I � L � w� �
v I � .' I .. I " �, � I � �
' -----�
� .. i � � — 3
-I . � � � -- ---- �
� I �� . � L_.r_f'__ �._______1— �__- � PL-B N
� �� � ,.. DEC-10 � I � rn
1 I � 99-17-Pi W zo
1 � I T 9oiO7 � , ��c�
� � L---- �tnw
N
� 1 - --- �) / tai.a°Zn
� �.I � .i—_ O AP-8 - - _ 7A BODT 3�O I
I '.' � ; I .; O I_ � / � WN�Y
� � � I / g z��o
-- �i i S�. _
�- •.x_�x'�,:�,o_x'x;x.x�c 9 r � �
`_7_� ? i i a ��m h
i Z . � i _-r:. i� �� _._-u.._ -�----o _ i % � 99-17-P2 � i DEC-12
• � -- -...- _ _- - -
� , . � -,---r---�i l- — - -� ��oo ¢ Z
sw uAV�E1.EAF � j � � ¢ i I
�_ SiREET_ _ _� .-I �� Fl 26
(NOT CONSTRUC7ED) _/% � :I t�.. < ASH-2a W O O M W
Fl-34 � -���n�'� OAK-B/12/12/1� OAK-28/2
� � 'I __.���- ______��� .L1�'��/k;:�I-26 HA-8/2 OAN-30 ASH-18 ��� N O
'__'_ —'
/ ,.��p.____.0 �B� '_ U p_—_i1•[Y2--� ❑— i�20 �I 20 � �
/ ' 3 i � ,.� � � ---- -- � > -
"� N ■ - ----- . _ p O�O� []
� '--- . ����w --------l � I I - . / I �- --- - � ' , ``. ` , � � ASF1 16�3� �O�� M Q
�. � '��t� - ASH-18/14 a '- c�
--- .
i � .uqt 3s �---------'� � �-s�� � �� 99-18-P1 � _. zO ��
1 . a �e ` y � UO p O
i ' , i I .i i i I I i ��`��. � y a l� ^. . � ASH-14/iB/18 J�F O
I _ — J � � \\ �� •. roF� �
i ' � i i ; , '� �� � . �� ; : � ��Q �
� � L-- C- i � �•� ' � . y . . �d Q� ��
i i l_�__ _ -� 1 I � ���3'. / . i i � d �
� I I � iA%OT � I � � ` �.` ' �� . .
� 1 � � _.1 0 .v .� w � . . J
� � ' � . � � �E�-?H ' ` .�v'� AP-22 `�`\` � iL ' J �v 4 W J I W . Z
� � , . _ -�____ � � � I `.`\�• - I Q
: .
, .
L i � r--- � � , , . . . . . . , . W a
. ��
. `
� i i � � L-------� � �. � � . . -' - . ,
� ._'Y� \ \ a,
� �
��
I . ` � �
� � : � __________________________ I \ ♦ . L �Y J� J� ,v �y . . � �r �
' . ;I '___ - I ♦ 0
li .
LJ I ��_--� � _ ---J . `` '.��W L � , W m y � a � /y WI.SH-t� nSH-t�/2 Q
99-18-P2 �' W W W ..� �• � ' � �
W C, �v J� w W .Y/ W
_� � I ,f�'''.•'. �r� O � i W M w �.� ASH-IOI2 lyNj
a�-t2 ;.z,,,, p,� W , ' . � �
_ - _ oe�o) '. ��y . .� TRACT yA". � i, ' / � �T � a
I _� ASH-11
r ' , . .. y y ' O` u W
t
� � y W L ` �
L J W \ � w
� � ASH-16 (�� $ f'
TAX LOT �r V 'Y u � W �' �
1002 . o . a � i�~ - Q
� � � L . ;Y�' ��P'
', . � - P
�_ 'Y . � ��,t� �p� � �
��0� � 6 � p
J �
i 0P � �
°� P LEGEND ���
OAK-2♦
�m
� � � � EVERGREEN TREE TO REMAIN �S
aD '�
�,
T"��a°T y ,�� �� EVERGREEN TREE TO BE REMOVED
�Deeign
o^-� ° v � Group
� m p ,u �o .o � ��� DECIDUOUS TREE TO REMAIN •-�' lnc.
.� � Planners
_ sC�e: i' - zo� � �, � Englnerrs
�� DEGDUOUS TREE TO BE REMOVEO Surveyors
., JSOO h.w.n1M lvmACE
vm
_ TREE PRFSERVATION PLAN
�u.ssoaa.wccw v�ii.
.NO�ctew)w-.:.�
sGLE: t'- 40' ---'---�—'--- --— AsN-t2i� rex:(so.7)e�s-ssoa
--- (OEADJ ...a�e.rv�.�a�
r. / JOB NO.:
��09
TA%LOT T���� 41FET N0.
1102 1100 ASH-30 �
" I
CITY OF T1GAR0 CASEFILES MLP1999-00017 dc MLP1999-00018 �t
8/9/2004
'' Conditions Associated With 9:3�:�9AM
. ��f
T I D E M A R K Case#: MLP2003-00012
COMPUTER SYSTEMS. INC.
Condition Status Updated
Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Date By
1 SCREEN TAX LOT 1001 ACCESS DRIVE None Met MAS V27/2004 MAS
1. Submit a plan showing proper screening of the access drive from tax lot 1001 according to Section 18.745.040 of the
Tigard Development Code.
1� ACCESS EASEMENT&MAINT.AGREEMEr None Met MAS 8/9/2004 MAS
2. Record a reciprocal access easement and maintenance agreement and submit a copy to the City.
1 ACCESS DRIVE STREET TREE PLAN None Met MAS 7/14/2004 MAS
3. Submit a plan showing the proposed access drive with street trees planted in accordance with Section 18.745.040.C.
1 TREE MITIGATION&PROTECTION PLAN None Met 12/IS/2003 MAS 12/15/2003 MAS
4. Provide a tree plan indicating the protection of all trees to remain and mitigation of trees removed over 12 inches in
diameter prepared by a certified arborist.
1 FIRE APPARATUS TURNAROUND None Met MAS 12/15/2003 MAS
S. Provide a fire apparatus turnaround in accordance with Section 18.705.030.(I)(4)of the Tigard Development Code.
(No fire apparatus required via. meeting with applicant on 09-14-03)
1 PFI PERMIT REQUIRED None Met 4/12/2004 KSM 4/12/2004 KSM
6. Prior to commencing onsite improvements,a Public Facility Improvement(PFI)permit is required for this project to
cover the sewer tap and construction and any other work in the public right-of-way. Six(6)sets of detailed public
improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to
any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets rclevant to public improvements. Public
Facility Improvement(PFI)permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards,which
are available at City Hall and the City's web page(www.ci.tigard.or.us).
1 PFI PERMIT FINANCIAL ASSURANCE None Met 4/12/2004 KSM 4/12/2004 KSM
7. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name,address and telephone number of the individual or
corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permittee",and who will provide the financial assurance for the public
improvements. For example,specify if the entity is a corporation,limited partnership,LLC,etc. Also specify the state
within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide
accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents.
1 PRIVATE STREET SIDEWALKS None Met 6/25/2004 KSM 6/25/2004 KSM
8. Prior to final plat approval the applicant shall construct sidewalks along at least one side of the private street.
1 PAY ADDRESSING FEE None Met 6/24/2004 ST 6/24/2004 PLN
9. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$60.00. (STAFF CONTACT:
Shirley Treat, Engineering).
1 90TH AVENUE RESTRICTIVE COVENANT None Met 8/4/2004 KSM 8/4/2004 ST
]0. The applicant shall execute a Restrictive Covenant whereby they agree to complete or participate in the future
improvements of SW 90th Avenue adjacent to the subject property,when any of the following events occur:
A. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for by tlie formation of a Local
Improvement District,
B. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for in whole or in part by the City or other
public agency,
C. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be constructed by a third party and involves the sharing of
design and/or construction expenses by the third party owner(s)of property in addition to the subject property,or
D. when construction of the improvements is deemed to be appropriate by the City Engineer in conjunction with
construction of improvements by others adjacent to the subject site.
1 90TH AVENUE ROW DEDICATION None Met 8/4/2004 KSM 8/4/2004 ST
1 1. The final plat shall show the dedication of right-of-way(ROW)on 90th Avenue to provide 27 feet from centerline.
Page 1 Of 3 CaseConditions..rpt
ington County,Oregon 2004-091368
� s/2004 11:39:49 AM
- D�E Cnt�1 Odt�21 RECORD81
S1b.00 S6.OD f11.00•Total�532.00
RETURN RECORDED DOCUMENT TO:
Matthew Harrell
CITY OF TIGARD 00632773200400913680030036
I,J�rty H�n�on,DlnctorofA���um�nt�nd Taxatlon r�
13125 SW Aall Blvd. �ntl Ez-Ofliclo County Cl�rk forNh�hlnptan County, �''�'�'`��,
Onpon,do h�nby urtly th�t th�wlthln In�trum�nt of � `"
Tlg$I'(1,OR 97223 �Itlnp wu nulwd and ncond�d In th�book of ��: .�``'
ncord�of�dd county. ��� `
��••. ��
J�rry R.H�n�on,Dinetor nnim�nt and Tucatlon, Y` t'�''^
File No. Exameio councy ci.r�
NO CAANGE IN TAX STATEMENT
ACCESS EASEMENT AND
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
FOR MOTOR VEHICLE DRIVEWAY ON
ADJOIl�IING PARCELS RESIDENTIAL USE Space above jor Washington CountyRecording informarion
THIS PERPETUAL EASEMENT, made and entered into on this August �e�'�,2004 between Fineview Farm,
L.L.C.hereinafter called the first party,and Pacific Crest Partners,Inc.hereinafter called the second party,
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, the first party is the owner in fee simple of the following described property in the City of Tigard,
County of Washington,State of Oregon,to wit:
T'hat iract of land described in Document No.2001038127,Washington County deed records,situated in the NE 1/4 of the
NE 1/4 of section 35, Township 1 South, Range 1 VJest, Willamette meridian, City of Tigard, County of Washington,
State of Oregon, being more particularly described as follows:Beginning at the inirial point, a 3/4 iron pipe found at the
intersection of the east right of way line of SW 90th avenue with the centeriine of vacated SW Mapleleaf street and
bearing N 00°35'08"W, 325.07 feet from a found 3/4" iron pipe mazking the southwest comer of block 19, "Town of
Metzger"; thence along the southerly boundary line of that tract of land described in Document No. 2001038128,
Washington County deed records the following courses:N 89°28'00"E, 10529 feet to a found 5/8"iron rod,S 53°33'49"
E,57.62 feet to a found 5/8"iron rod,N 79°23'04"E,60.89 feet to a found 5/8"iron md and N 30°03'48"E,27.87 feet to
the southwest corner of that tract of land described in Doctunent No. 87011579,Washington County deed records;thence
along the south line of said tract described in Document No. 87011579,N 89°28'00"E,237.31 feet to a found 5/8" iron
rod, a point of curvature on the northwesterly line of that tract described in 2000005290, Washington County deed
records;thence along said northwesterly line and continuing along the northwesterly line of that lract of land described in
Document No. 81005099, Washington County deed records, 353.91 feet along the arc of a 1885.08 foot radius curve
concave to the northwest through a central angle of 10°45'25",the chord of which beais S 41°35'S7"W,353.39 feet to a
point on the east line of that ti-act of land described in Document No.96003523;thence along said east line and continuing
along the east line of that h�act of land described in book 745 at page 184,Washington County deed records,N 00°35'08"
W, 97.05 feet to a found '/." iron pipe; thence along the north line of said tract described in book 745 at page 184, S
89°28'00" W, 125.23 feet to a found 5/8" iron rod at the southeast comer of that hact of land described in 83023187,
Washington County deed records; thence along the east line of said tract described in Document No. 83023187 and
continuing along the East line of that tract of land described in Document No. 2001048639, Washington County deed
records N 00°35'OS" W, 150.02 feet to a found 5/8" iron rod; thence along the north line of said tract described in
Document No.2001048639,S 89°28'00"W, 100.23 feet to a found 5/8"iron rod on the East right of way line of SW 90tti
Avenue;thence along said east right of way line N 00°35'08"W, 15.00 feet to the point of beginning. Contauung 52,496
square feet
and the second is the owner in fee simple of the following described real property in said City, County, and State,
to wit:
That tract of land described in Document No.2001038128,Washington County deed records,situated in the NE 1/4 of the
NE 1/4 of section 35, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, Willamette meridian, City of Tigard, County of Washington,
State of Oregon, being more particularly described as follows: beginning at the initial point, a 3/4 iron pipe found at the
Page 1 of 3
I:�FN(�PUB-FORMSUNfAC-CO.DOT
_- s iiiiiiii iiiiii��������������
intersection of the east right of way line of SW 90th avenue with the centerline of vacated SW Mapleleaf s�eet and
bearing N 00° 35'O8" W, 325.07 feet from a found 3/4" iron pipe marking the SW corner of block 19, "Town of
Metzger"; thence along the east right of way line of SW 90th avenue N 00°35'08"W, 15.00 feet to a found 5/8"iron rod,
thence leaving said right of way line, along the south and east lines of that tract of land described in Document No.
97058637,Washington County deed records the following courses:N 89°28'00"E,88.24 feet to a found 5/8" iron rod&
N 00°35'08"W,85.00 feet to a found brass screw on the south line of that tract of land described as Parcel I in Document
NQ. 2000072550, Washington County deed records; thence along said south line and continuing along the south line of
that iract of land described as Parcel II in Document No.2000072550,Washington County deed records,N 89°28'00"E,
137.22 feet to a point on the west line of that tract of land described in Document No. 96078241, Washington County
deed records;thence along said west line and continuing along the west line of that iract of land described in Document
No. 87011579,Washington County deed records S 00°35'08"E, 100.00 feet to a point on the northerly boundary line of
that tract of land described in Document No.2001038127,Washington County deed records;thence along said northerly
boundary the following coarses: S 30°03'48" W, 27.87 feet to a found 5/8" iron rod, S 79°23'04" W, 60.89 feet, N
53°33'49" W, 57.62 feet to a found 5/8" iron rod and S 89°28'00"W, 105.29 feet to the point of beginning. Contanung
17,772 square feet
and said two parcels of real estate adjoin each other,
WHEREAS, the parties desire to grant to each other an easement and right to use the described motor vehicle
driveway now or to be constructed along and upon a portion of both of the parcels in conjunction with any lawful
use_
NOW, TI�REFORE, in consideration of each party's granting to the other an easement hereinafter described, and
other valuable consideration each to the other in hand paid,the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged:
FIRST: First party conveys to second party a perpetual easement for motor vehicle driveway purposes to use in
conjunction with any lawful use along and upon that portion of first party's property described as follows,to wit:
A lract of land situated in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 35,Township 1 South,Range I West of the Willamette Meridian,
County of Washington, State of Oregon,being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a 3/4 iron pipe found
at the intersection of the east right of way line of SW 90th Avenue with the centerline of vacated SW Mapleleaf Street and
bearing N 00°35'08"W,325.07 feet from a'/,"iron pipe marking the SW comer of Block 19,"Town of Metzge�';thence
along the Southerly boundary line of that tract of land described in Document No. 2001038128, N89°28'00"E, 105.29
feet; thence S 53°33'49"E,34.96 feet; thence leaving said boundary line,S32°49'41"W, 15.05 feet; thence S 89°24'S2'
W,24.69 feet to a point on the East boundary of that tract of land described in Document No.2001048639;thence along
said boundary line,N00°35'08"W, 18.62 feet; thence S 89°28'00"W, 100.23 feet a point on the east right of way line of
SW 90th Avenue; thence along the east right of way line of SW 9(1th Avenue,25.00 feet distant from the centerline of
said SW 90th Avenue,N 00°35'08"W, 15.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 0.05 Acres—2,266 sq.ft.
SECOND: Second party conveys to the first party a perpetual easement for motor vehicle purposes for use in
conjunction with any lawful use along and upon that portion of second party's property described as follows, to
wit:
A tract of land situated in the Northeast 1/4 of Secrion 35,Township 1 South,Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian,
County of Washington, State of Oregoq being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a 3/4 iron pipe found
at the intersection of the East right of way line of SW 90th Avenue with the centerline of vacated SW Mapleleaf Street
and bearing N 00°35'08" W, 325.07 feet from a'/." iron pipe marking the SW comer of Block 19, "Town of Metzge�';
thence along the east right of way line of SW 90th Avenue,25.00 feet distant from the centerline of said SW 90 Avenue,
N 00°35'08"W, 15.00 feet; thence leaving said right of way line, along the South line of that tract of land described in
Document No. 97058637 and the Easterly projection Wereof,N89°28'00"E, 133.24 feet;thence S 00°32'00"E,36.03 feet
to a point on the Northerly boundary line of that tract of land descn'bed in Document No.2001038127;thence along said
Northerly boundary N 53°33'49"W,34.96 feet;thence S 89°28'00"W, 105.29 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing
0.05 Acres—2,292 sq.ft.
TI�RD: It is mutually agreed that each party may use in common with the otl�er pdrty, the whole of said motor
vehicle driveway, including that portion thereof situated on the property of the other pariy for ingress and egress of
motor vehicle,pedestrians,and uses incidental to any lawful use of the property.
Page 2 of 3
i:�c�ruB.FOxMS�n�recconor
• L IIIIIIII IIII'llll I II�IIII III
� 2004-91368
FOURTH: This agreement should bind and inure to the benefit of, as the circumstance may require, not only the
immediate parties hereto, but also to their respective heirs, executors, administrators, and successors in interest as
well.
FIFTH: The maintenance shall be a shared responsibility of the parties and each of the parties shall share the cost
of maintaining the easement. The obligation to share maintenance costs shall begin when the driveway is
completed.
SIXTH: In construing the foregoing agreement, the plural shall mean and include the singular whenever the
context so requires.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I hereunto set my hand on this �� day of August,2004.
Fineview Farm,L.L.C. ` ��-��--
Name of Company Signature
1430 Eastside Road,Hood River,OR 97031 Member
Address Title
STATE OF OREGON )
)ss.
County of Washington }
-r�t
This instrument was acknowledged before me on August �o—,2004 by Daniel J.Boyden as
Member of Fineview Farm,L.L.C.
OFFICIAL SEAL
KAREN A.DANSON Notary's Signature
i NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON
COMMISSION N0.341375 My Commission Expires: i ��,U-a���
MY COMMISSION EXpIRES JAN,20,2�05
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I hereunto set my hand on this �� day of August,2004.
Pacific Crest Partners.Inc ��' •��-
Name of Corporation Signature
1430 Eastside Road,Hood River,OR 97031 President
Address Title
STATE OF OREGON )
)ss.
County of Washington )
This instrument was acknowledged before me on August �a , 2004 by Daniel J. Boyden as President of
Pacific Crest Partners,Inc.
c.(. �l�riLl.S C�
OFFICIAL SEAL Nota.ry's Si�nature
K14REN A.DANSON
NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON My Commission Expires: � 'v� G� �v�U�S
COMMISSION ND.341375
MY COMMISSIDN EXPIRES JAN.20,2005
Page 3 of 3
I:�I(APUB-FORMSUNf ACL'O.DOT
�
CITY OF TIGARD 6/24/2004
13125 SW Hall Blvd. 12:07:14PM
- Tigard,Oregon 97223
(503) 639-4171
Receipt #: 27200400000000002738
Date: 06/24/2004
Line Items:
Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid
MLP2003-00012 [UNGRND] Fee Lieu Underground 230-0000-445003 412.50
Line Item Total: $412.50
Payments:
Method Payer User ID Acc�/Check Approval No. How Received Amount Paid
CreditCard DAN BOYDEN KJP 063383 In Person 412.50
Payment Total: $�312.50
Page 1 of 1 cReceipt.rpt
t, ,��f .
CleanWater Services
���L�-���-- �'v�Z
December 17, 2003
Ed Murphy
Ed Murphy & Associates
9875 SW Murdock St.
Tigard, Oregon 97224
Re: Fineview Partitions, CWS File #3280
1 S 135AA 00901/01000
Dear Ed:
We received your planting plan drawing and legend for the above referenced
property, as required under Condition #16 of the Service Provider Letter(SPL).
Based on our review of the figure and table, the proposed planting locations,
numbers, and species meet CWS specifications.
Thank you for following up on this matter. If you have any questions, please
contact me at maclarenc(c�cleanwaterservices.orq or at (503) 846-3647.
Sincerely,
_ �
Colin MacLaren
Environmental Plan Review
cc. Matt Scheidegger, City of Tigard
Attachments (2)
155 N First Avenue,Suite 270•Hillsboro,Oregon 97124
Phone:(503)846-8621 •Fax: (503)846-3525•www.deanwaterservices.org
l
�
� o
�
. ¢� ii f
� �
� � � �
� � . .
0
� � .
�.�: -:.�- _ :;.: .
/� :,..
\� �p`,t,,,`, .
• O/�\\� ry,A�� •
�:� / O 4�'
t1�/ O �,� 'f. �
�
OO, •�
� •
♦ � �� •
�e,�oo • � '',.�•
a�,o*,,` OQ'.f.� �i��
4;o�'cy ',�,a '�
r �����.
��k.'y '� �.
• ••'�-�...�w_.-• 'L• �
. � Q �
� • �
. �
•
O
��
A � � � FINEVIEW FARM.LLC PLANTING � �
- � i 15500 SW JAY STREET
9 � � � ���� BEAVERTON,OR 97006 �N � ,
� G
r
C
C
)
f
C
'NATIVE PLANTS' L�GEND '
�
r
r
C
PL�,NT SY1v1BOl QUANTI71' BOIAN:CAL NAME COMMON NAME NOTES �
E5 �
' 05 ALNUS RUORA RPD ALDEk ' `
• OS ' FRAxINUS LAT!FOUA ORFGON A511
' 05 PSEUDOTSUCA MENZIFSII DOUGLAS FIR
03 PF�I.IKU'"j EMAR6tNATA. BITTER CHERRY
� 05 C�UPRCUS GARRYANA ORPGG?N tiAMITE OAK
c
�'� • 05 T"1UJA PLIGATr1 WESTERN RED CEDAR i
�
g�R ' - �
RUBS -- - - .. i '
— _ c
- -- _ i
08 AMELA�CHIFR A�NIFCUA WESTERN SERVICEBERRY -
08 O�M��IA CERA5IFORM15 IWD�AN PLUM
+ OQ `: RIBES SAVGUIV�'JM Rfp FI,OWP!ZING GURR{aNT
• 0° � ROS?�6Yt,�NOCARPA � aALptiIP ROSE
' �� eOSA NUTIC?,N.4 NOOTKA ROSE �
� � _ .
O� SAMBUCUS Rr�C�MOSA RED ELDERBERRY .
t - - �
c
c
/ \ t
/•.�-� ,� �
/ � � � -
r�
` ; �
' ex15TING OAK � � �, E;c15TiNG A5� j� ,_ ,�� EX.STING DECIDU0U5
i ;
i ,\ r � �
_ '� \ ; � vJ � `''� j
�._���� �� ��
;
�
r
+ �
e
I •
.,,. - - - • • p. �
�,�-.. � . �. . � � ��P .Z ca� 3 - �o��...
; ,�° ..� �-,, . �. . .:-::.. �� . . .
� �������� ���������
�
' �7�rz;�a�ni��i�a',�a.1`r ix��c��ar. . File Number
. . . . . . . . . .. .... . `-`���J
Jurisdiction Clean Water Serv�CeS
Map & Tax Lot r ard Seryice Provlder Letfer
'j+��AA 00901/01000 �ate 8/22/p3
Owner Dan Bo den
Site Address E. of SW 90 &S. of �ontact Fishman Envir
SW Locust St TI ard Liz French ��mcnta!
Proposed qctivity Land partition Address
434 NW 6 , Suite 304
� Portland, OR 97209-3600
. Phone 503.224,0333
This form and the aftached conditions will serve as our
accordance with Cfean Water Servlces Design and Constructio
y Serylce Provfder Letter in
n SEandards (R�p 03-11j,
YES NO
I Resources
Assessment(NRq) � a Altematives qnalysis Y�$ NO
i Submitted Requlred
District Site Vfsit �S�ct�on 3.02.6) ❑ �
Date: 8/20/03 � �
Tfer 1 Aftematives Analysis �
Concur with NRA/or �
submiffed lnformafion � �
Tier 2 Altematives qna�ysis �
Sensitive Area present ❑
On-Site � a Vegetated Corridor
Sensitive Area Present Av��gJng ❑ �
�Off-Site � � Vegetated Corridor ,
Mitigation Requlred � �
Vegetated Corrldor
Present On-Sfte � � On-Site Mftlgation
—� Width of Vegetated � �
. . __. Corridor(feet) 25 ft.
Condition of Vegetated �ff��e M�Aa�on • �
CoMdor Degraded P�an6ng Pfan Attached � �
. Flnat p►anqng plan required ❑
E�hancement Required prtor to constn,ct►on ��
� � Enhancement/restoration � �
• Encroachment into �omp�etion date
Vegetated Corridor �
(Section 3.02.4) . � RSqT(no longer required)
TYpe and Square Footage ❑ a '
of Encroachment Geotechnlcal Report
Allowed Use requJred ' � �
(Section 3.02.4.b.2) ❑ � Condltions Attached
This Service pro 1 � � �
vider Letter does NOT ellminate the need to evaluate an
water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequent�y disco
property, vered on yo�tl profiect
•--• �-••.• 5u�y681674 p. 3
r � �� �
ME1►1 pRAND UM
To: City of Tigard, Planning
ArrN: Matt Scheidegger
Fax #: 503-684-7297
D�te: 12/!7/Q3
R�� Fineview partitions, MLP 2003-00011 and MLP 2003-OQ012
MESSAGE: Hi Matt. As
memorandum of understanding revisingrmoum discussions, attached is a
rev(se the p�elimina�y construction drawings to efl dated 7.2/pg/p3, �/e wil{
memo.
ect the statements in this
IPhone 503. 62�-4625 IFax o
5 3•968.16�4 �ejmurphyCvaol.com
Feb 03 04 10: 14a Murphy 50?°681674 p. 4
l�neview Parritiorts
MLP 2Q03-00011
1. The screening that is requlred alang the north property line of the flag pole next
to tax Iot '9Q6' could be either a fence or vegetatian. If the property owner of
tax lot `906' agrees and provides a landscape easement, a vegetative screen will
be placed on that property in the space between the retaining wa(I and the
property line. Otherwise, a 6'-high wood fence wil! be constructed on the
property line, as shown on the construction drawings.
2. Street trees are required along the north side of the driveway, since the
developer is not able to retain the six larger fir trees along the south side of the
proposed driveway (with(n the flag pole area of MLP 2003-00012).
3. The tree plan submitted with the applicat(on is adequate,
4, The developer will construct a 5-foot wide sidewalk along the south side of the
shared driveways, in flag pole area oF Parcel i created via MLP 2003-00012.
--� 5. Street lights are not required,
6. No curb is required along the north side of the driveway.
MLP 2003-OQ012 �
i. The screening that is required along the south property line of khe flag pofe next
to tax lot'1001' could be elther a fence or vegetation.
2. New street trees are not required because there is not enough room for both
street trees and the sidewalk along the south side oF the driveway,
3, The tree plan submitted with the application Is adequate.
4. The City will not require a fire apparatus turn-around.
—�> 5. Street fights are not required,
6, The deveioper will construct a 5-foot wide sidewalk aiong the south side of the
flag pole. The sidewalk width includes the width of the curb.
cc, Dan Boyden
Craig Harris, LDC Design Group, Tnc.
Kim McMillan, Development Review Engineer
edmurphy/buyden/fineview/matrfux�ll2/IS/U3 2
fi�
' _"."' rns 1 501 228 782I `'uJ�btf 1 674
TICOR TITLE p' S
, — .. �JU07
. �tF.ruwv RscoROeo nocan+�rrr ro:
•m r�sn���coans uEr,�xiTMenr,
,, Cll'k'DCTIGA�tD
IJ125 SW Il�llbh�, w..Mnoi.neewy,oRpvn 2007-027757
TIprJ,OK 97I3] � ' 0��e c11Z00:0:1'0lCO Dfl
�4 INDIVII)UAL �
��p.aeuoo t,�.ee.reaa�a.a
�� � � illillliiNfINll(IIIIIIHIf f111111111NIIRIIIK
F��,N��. M�-l° 1°l°1%�0°°1'1 , oo d]aa12UO2CO�»eiooaao]s
N�.-p lqi`1-� �.,.,�..,,»�,o..r.�.�,...,�..,.,.......,
. `O . .�.�w.im��.t�wr Gn�aw.,n�A�vn c.utiv �
���11�YNMiNwx�MwMW�1/�I�AYIIQ �'
. ' M��I{N.�/�n�qs�N�1Y�d11N�l�tN��l 1.I
, INI��Y� �,
� . J�wYN.MM�M.OMN��*MI���T��MMn .
EASEMENI• _ _E'a�n�4[.�..bti�
PFRN1i1NEN"T SANlTARY SL•WL�R
Spor�obm rtirrved jsr Wot1uR[I0+Gowry Rncwd�•y i/"ammn��
—J.L�L�1,.1x.1�4_.-1].L�L'� �LJ 1 7':: •. __,__ hatinalltr ulled �he Gnmtnrs.
gronf a�d tanvey unco ihr�iry uf Tiycrd a perperool ouement ror eonatructing,rcconswcting, oper•rting,roaincaining,
in�peeling,and rcpoiring uf an underground sewer linc uhd sppunenanees,logether wlth�he�igl�t u remo�o,as neces,cury,
vCEclatiem, falinge,trces,and odier ob.weiions o�i tha purcel of,lend dacribed in the�twehed Czhi6ie"A"situ�ted in the
�i�Y vf 7ib�rd,Wnshi��gmn Cotmry,5�alt vfUregpn.
THE�['RUC CONSIllLRATfO�' ful•Uiis Coavcy:mce iS�S�..�U.:Howr:vm,tlie actual eonside�uion conais��of or;ncluAcs
uther proprny or vuluc given ar prumi+.�d Whiel�is thc wholc coruideratiWl.
f7'15 f:XPRkSSLY IJNDSRS"COUD d�rt lh�s cosemcnl dues rwt eonvey any righ�litle,or ui�erost accpt Ihuse cxpnssly
cWrod ip chii escemci6 nor o�herwise prcvem Gnnrarsilrom Ihc fbll we�nd;da�ninion U�nsovor,provi�led��1bWCVK,Uiae
Sikh usc shall no�inuert�,c wi�h Itu uses�tld purpocrs of ibt Inlent of the cuscM1lsnt
1'IV(;Ot�SIDERATION of the prcmiu�,(irruitce agroes chlt if stid Cxmteo, qc nucusFOre ar msigns sl�ould c�usc soid
casemenc�o he vaeucd,thc riQlits pf 1hc Gnntec In(hc above-dest;ribe0 emcmrn�wiU he forFcited o�wf slwll irtun�dialely
rc�cn�o r1,o Granrorf,cluir succcssc+rs and�cyiQns in clic csu of such evrm..::
TO FLAVE ANn'fo H�LA rhe abuvc-de.�cribed•r�id�arud pranlscH u�rn 9Cid Grsnoee,j{5 Su�CC�SO�S,�nd a�Sl�nS�vfevrr.
I
M�I7'N6SS WHF,R.EOF',f hcreun�o se�my hmid un Utis ZZ h C� _dqy o(_,_Q_�°�e� ,Zp 0 l
����_ __ :���. ��,,:� -M
Signoture , � 5ignsWre.
�SSD Sc� �xwc� e r. �` ��) � �a�_�_._
ndrcss Addre s /�
�11�I�A �2 S 7 GD 6_ _ � �C�,�IAC �_I��----
. ; IZ�� :i v3oC� b►,.� c a�-..
STA'ftiOFQRfGON ) . ' ��/ Av
)03 : .�9at�'Glr lJ�--
CoWlty uf Wa+hin�ton ) ' �
It���nuwmcn�was�tknuwloJ�cd Ucfore nrc on .J���C�_(doic)by:��f!L��re.�d r,I�Gi ��� � r
��-,—— — ."__. _.. .(nrme of pcnon(sl).
UfclCul SEAL
PAN BOYD
NO7ARY PUBI�C•OPFGON •.n `
� �nMMIS510N NO.�1JA�5 , }�^��`�....L��— —
Mr rAM41i65iun D�nES�un.12.700�
�.'srsx�. Nu�ary'�511y�arure �
. My Canmtsslon Fxpires:_.,T(�r�Z�L��
�� ,
Atccprcd on brh�p�o!�he C'iry of 7 ignrd thi� �Q day of oyd M�.6t Y .204(.
• � �___�: t�1__``""..�— --
. �Ciry En�meer
NO CYIANGE 1N TAX 5TAT1:Mi:NT � •
I.�kkGYM1M1+CqMY•.IIWl.lwl . , '
Feb 03 04 10: 15a Mur�h� 50?�681674 p. 6
12✓'05/OJ � FRI 08:4J F�X 1 50, 3 7821 TICOR TITLE
. ,
.�.. ... _. :..._._. _. . .. .
008
_. ..... .... . ., . �
I
- S i�ii�;u:, ly f � � 1 .
..�..,._, r. II �
. . II Ill !
,u II 1�
� . . ���1 �
- f�:: Design T002-z„�T __�. _ _ ...--
, t� :: .:!': Gro� ' �
e•�;"' I
i
�
�
OESCRIPTION FOR SANITARY SEV1fFR EASEMENT �
l'l N OF 7HE NORrHEAST QUART�R OF;�EC71dN 35,T. 1 S.,R. 1 W,WM•,
THAT POR 0
WASNII3GTON COUN?`f,OREGON MORE PARTICULWRLY DESGRIBEO AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTNWEST CORNCR OF THEITRACT aF LAND TO WOLF RECORD�D A5
DOC.N0.20010a8638 Of THE DECD RECORDS OF:�5a�0 COUNTY:
THENCE N00°35'OB"�N, 13,65 FE�T ALONG:THE EASTERIY RIGNT OF WAY LINE OF S.W.90T"
AVENUE;TNENCE LEAVING SAID EASTEFiLY RIGH�OF WAY LINE,S8B°33'op"E, 100.32 FEE7 Ta
A POINT ON THE WES7 LINE OF TkiE TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DOC.N0.2001038127 Of
SAID RECORDS:THENCE S00"35'08"E, 1fl:1 B FEET ALONG SAID WF3Y L{NE TO THE NOR7HEAST
CORNER DF THL-TRACT OF lANO DESCRIBED.IN DOC.N0.83023187 OF SAID RECORDS;
THENCE 589'28'00"N 100.26 FEEt ALOI�G THE�NO Tti LINE OF SAID TRACT TO THE POINT OF
BEGiNNING. : . '�
�i
: ' , :)
. . :�
�1/07101 '
7009SK3.00C .
: . .�
. �
• �
- ' : • !
. . . .i
,
- � �
. �
: . . : : �
: '
� .
: � �
� ' . f
. � :�
I
� I
r I
I
. . I
�
'I
I
Feb U� U4 1U: 15a �Urpny au��ooic �Y N. r
12,/05i0J , FRI 09:4J FqY 1 50; 9 7821 TICOR TITLE.,_. C�009
��— �11 —T'— �_ _ ----^-----
� � . � �II111 —
. Ill
_ I[III
1I
III
NI
III
• ; r zoa2-zi�st . ; pESCRIP tJON SKETCH
. I i I - -'.._ .- - - _ .~ . I� lKF NFJ/� L1�5£CIlGw J3. T. t S, R t w.,
� � � N;y., wASh'1NC10N COU�vTY, GKEGON
I I , 1
I I ' ' I
I 1 f
I I � � I
I i 1 � , : 1
I � . . • l
I i . � • I
I I . . . � I
I I ' I �
I I • ' I i�
I I ' 1 ��
i 1 , . . I �
I I ' . ' I /
1 ( I �
I 1 ' 1 i�
_J i , � �
-- ' F-- - -- - --------____1_-- --------�
` i .
I � „
f.------^--__- -_-. ____'--- ��`.
.-- - � �. �.
� .
� � � \
�
.
`. �
� �
. �. .
I �. �
.
--•�� � . .\ .4_..-
i . � �
.
� . .
. .
� i `�
i . .
� DOG Nb. ZOOrO<B6J9 �
. ♦
I � �
1 � • •
� � ��
� � + .,
� � � PROPI)SCOIUBUC
4 I � SAnit�A��9ER DOC. N0. 200loJdfl�
� Q CIl4iMEN1
� . SB8�J'o4 E 100,J?' '�
i Z � _ ��
i � ' �� ' � �d
� � 1 ,�,� °`'
�
� � I g~ I 58978 00"W l0�.76' i�
i ;
; � i I . �
I •
� � 1
' ' � . . . �
� � OOC. NO B3oJ1+91 �
I � 1
1 � j ' ; . . �
� ' . I
I I � 1 ' ► N i
� � ' ' � i
I � � , 1 i�
i � � � . I i�i
� I ' �___i.___^__�_�--f---•--
� L-----------------���_---
I � : . '
� � :
I � � ! ,
� � : .
� � I
I � :.
I '
� ' ,, °' .'
� :1 . . .
Feb 03 04 10: 15a Mur^hy 50?q681674 p. a
1x(U5/o� . FRI 08:Q3 FAS 1 50, 8 7821 TICOR TITLE _ �010
,I , .,,:.;..,::....,•..w.,�...•,..._.�::_— .
A41�1 nf. Iw r r [rr. xl. ...........�.._���ti'_':—:....• ' �^�
�a,��,.,�,_....,,,. _ ,_�._�..,.:_�'L --:_��-__.._ . �8 2 0 I 0 4 6 6 G�
s�- -_�._��---- �---. . ,
_ _ _.. - .
i�=:�i. - . �aKn�w Arro,.tc•�'� . . :: i. . Hu� (r � r N.._ •
: �t{i, ur.c.,qn�+�.-JUDY r...��00P oNl� ,
i�Np��n�.L niLN[1N THLSIi 1'R6+L'NTS�Tl�u�...� .�
.....
b :in! �u ll cl Ar,i u�
� .. ,.. '
....i'fA�C.Eti..v. CI{Al'hUM...... : • • •... nnu.' unn . �. . . •
� � «roiller nxied.tlx�Iit�eltY lrnnt�Uorr:�dn�1c+1 nnd' Y: . . . .. . ......... � ;
p�fbn corofdcrwov�fui �ru. v..r.�ur►aN �. .�. •� ' � (
SI1IR'�.L`Y..1,. LLUt�C..lU�Y�C. uW0-Av9 FM• 'S 'hnl cur.dn rcol�r.�nnfl'nHHi�he
lerrmalvr c��IcJ M+Mec,uM!wilo f•n'�hun Imn.�vftwo�s nn�r a�n�Y��u�rnl�pnrainfn��u�mdcd in HK Cuunll 1 .
enE�n
�
i nnew�rnin.bntd�rnmedz.rtl arm�rvnnn�ti:�c crlO�d u:Ivl�o���h+ar. . . . f,
oL.........i�[no h I,n�t nn,..... .,Slon ol 0a(,an.
� il�e tivrUi )U tccc uf I.uco ] nnU 4. Dlvck l9� TO4N OF 1TSZQEIt}'.�n��� Rooclnl,� I I
� voe��nt�en Cou�ty, are[��, �:�b1«' c� u �i,��r co�ehenc �tfrctt�r
� feee af che Nortl� 10 l��•� o% nalo I.neo 7 ioJ 4. . . . . I� , •.
f � �;
I i...
I � 6ol:r.c Joe� noe pu�r�ecce unl[ncy �cuee ov�f)n1111'ty or Yep�tt� tank apptev�l I
�� �::.
I lI �� 1`..
!� ' ' 1' t
� ►�}'11t lrrr�xf uF tnis 17FL� IS 40 CRFI�TE A•NF.W'1'AX"f,OT �_,.
. � • .. ' I' ',;.
. ' , ' I, �`r
. ' . I� �'j
: .. �.'
, 111•J�CI M�1\��IC�/Y���+N�ona.n�+"0�NYIIII SWIY�e;:Oft tl(W 4Ni�n�(Ornvtr. I� 4�•.
7o Ifuve nn�to Mau1 iha�nme umo iAe..wd��fronlrr�n/Jr�nlrn'�heiN� .Or......... . . f'.
fv U�i.I�.��a�er��Id�J u�l.fno M daflnn,�-: eed wlud�i� �I •��.
1 i;,.frue und a�luol ron�idvn��un�eiJ � el! o. udue Jlrcn or PfarN I �..
�Hare.e4 fhe.rwl con.ide:alion��,ut�Of ory��dn 1�'ym��M�ptwri�YlNd4.dr•ubl.leu�Jr�ORYp.�70•) �
I �:i Iiio coa�drrnfie�(���'celv uliidQ� (rn...�•,� �
1n���hiM II��dced en��rhe�a Ihu contert%o re9�"�e1,Iho rin��(�r u�r�'���;�he Plmel and n1I��On�fitaf
f�v�r�aw11Y io ror/��aGa�c rnd ie�ndiridvdo �'
� DeeaTrqF ,.,�r.0�.; � �•
I Wn/n slwll ba i�nO��ed fo m01N(!h P�ovi+ia�F hi�e�.�in.rrum�n��M�..... ;�d.r oL. .. :
f�Witnc;i Whereo7.fl�e/rnnlar Ao�eae�led: �a�nd n■I��fliaJ bY�ia olfkef�dulr awhonard N�c�ero 6y i
e i!.earp�rur.pen�or.it ho eeuuJ il�rMmr�o A.ii! • �:: ' rL�L,i . .
� erdcr ol il�4n�•J o!d(iec�an. �/p��, ��ry '
I � �' __ �, �:' : � IRLd(.�,I,.UYL'�?C�... .. .......�..,. .... . . �y;:
i
�lly.Cl�a�•� T�"- 51'i000 ' i
I Froncc� �� ChooM� �
i�
�n.w..i.o.n�w..aw ' � ' i � .
MIM 1�I1�/��.NI � ��.�.r..-.�...�.�.�.....�r .�LL II
1 ��SfAT's 0/O!lEaON,Cw��Y
y7ar�or oRC60N. ..l u. � .._...�.-'_...........::.Q...�.... �..�.....�...�........«a
. ;
.� �Iwhlayto■ ..-. ? rNU»ur.w.r��.........;..........
e...q _... , � ...__.�..odM��rr.,,��. � :.
......u.M7.. ...�.._.:...__...__.�....-..,:...._ ;
._....QCC.tC1bAL.__............ , .. � i�u ib�rwawr b�!s .
. •�d�rr MarNf ul wa«••fu IM��N�.GJ�W ( I .�w t w -
ry.wwllr rPru./rM�4rr�ww!.........._.. .� : � ....�u._._.......JN.i � ..._...-.._......- .
._._..._........ . .. �aar an/ M� 1..1 4 1
Chl:ln I. aauc� 1uE;C. Wad4......._.. ' .__........�......�.. ._ ..,......... �1�p�� ..-,. .. �ur
..._.,._. ..
.._.�.....�_......._..._.... .. ._ .
Ft.ne.o_4;bnnpm�n....._...,.............,. ..._..._.._. . � °
.�• � .._... ..r�J�rYna.�liitrd t6�(udd�xl M�Im' ; �r�/41(M r�.i�dll.d��•tM bnLdK Inunm�A I�M1�nro��.o.�
..... . I
...............-.. �rl�N'�NNIM MI INI YN�I11JfYwvlll YVI�1�fW`�°�w...6 at
y��nr b Ir. ....0� s-+•....•.•.•�w�rr/� i •• ��W.r MU nrM�d�n� u1MlU d in I�e�Jwiiui �O wr�r•r/.
/ ��•; mm.eqw�.i.Ad.rH Giirae+nCm M If�.. r 1
6L.Lak..1•'r Orl�n in' . . lOFFfGAL
i. • �i..`:'��::.+:.?.T.�f•'� : � .'_ _.._._.. ...'__.. tLA J
1
(C�I,!AL .../-- . ...`t!_!•.: ......."_........�_ ....
'L':t.`:":.'r'i.::i.a......1 nw�r�r+n.l.�w.�.rr
I . �. o���..;
n �.�,: C. 2�70•!�S
� �' Ilr mm�hd�n v�Bw . .
,I M �.N�,r.�'.�� . . .
' . , , .��iTE0f0111'UON� ` 5j
I ...... ... �. . - . ��
. . ..��
..._ ... . .
, _"'.._.. ..�. ..
. _....._..... .� . ..
GWnit H'W 1��
I .....___ .. " --
. ._. ._....__.... �.. . . .
. I.Oari<W:Aumn i�clero,rrannm:
.�....... ...-....._..._........�•�..�..w... . •.. � -
. ,{es lI1�YW1 NC'E�'�uGO��hNO�N�O^' �
...-...,�.. . • wro w�N 1V•eeniry n�i i
.. ' ; '• �w� uttlmd
I • - ' ..... _. ' '. ' r ol� p , , m" -
.. .. . ....... ...� , � �eMy�oi�cN�ui r
�nc !st
r11 n °��
n0 reG ded M 7� Cor
,. • " . . � cio
,•..••••...• :Hu��NI14• �..� : . !)YMId M�.(�hM��Dlf
....i........._. :.......__._.., , I
_ ......��..�a....�.,......n � . . �na��MM�M Twd�On.Eh
_i' ^ .�n..M�� � .. '. �OtIkNC.W10M�hCkrt �I
Mr� � iv��� T �CLiYC! '.�'r . .
��,�, c��- ,,� ' � ,:''.;,.�
�o,��d�� �� 9d�. d�-::.-�....-:. : . o , '. ' .' I
�'.y���'��.::9otM�.�_..... ' . �: . °� �
•.����w��w���•••1�1 JI1���Mf��F��N n11 w N�IMI�Y��//r.u.� '� I _
;. ...... � • isst nPn t� ar��o:2a �
.l I� __,_.. __,,��;,�,.,.::��•:'.: :..�; � —.. . r — ` .
�,—_-_ --�--._'_
� . . .,.... —..;,....., , . . . - ; .
��•� .�gNaYry�'. 1' r. S �.�1:"���t�fCt�.� • _.
� � yOt{•n... ., .
I,,,'' ��p�1� � (982 �,,�:;,iy.��;' �.,.;��.�: , . __
al�.,�e'�� f`q'� .." .� I Y n ���.'�3_1�� 'r
I . � . . • T . E ��; ..
) t a+ '�, � . , .
..t;:r �.}�1L.�} � . � �v ��'.��t..��1�..� p�.� ((�, 4� �� i�� :�:� •�:.w � �9e�;i;r=�ti��;fu.::; .
A�� �.n�,�, v�
, ;;;.ii;:m�,;�� : .„ n.� '�U��'..q`��...ule�{�1;, S.�!.p��'� ��'•��.s:i�L��',�•,.�;''�.. !.4_=0F7t.:ti• •�..h .1
. .1.�..�, na+c^m.�.,,_ _ ,�il.`t��.i��:._. '4��r,kf]t'}-��.. � . . . . , �
Feb 03 04 10: 16a Mur� �i 503^^•81674 p. y
1��voiva, FRI 09:44 FAX 1 509 7B21 TICOR TITLE__„ @1011
!� : • �
' , , '
1 � •; ' . gTAtE OF ORrOQN
. � } 68
. COUnty of W��hfn9lon
' M•11.!
1,Jerry np,pq,;�t 01 Aasees-
J4F1TR RECORD7NG r ��N T�' � . . �mant and�n an�r�-C�R�o County
1- CUrk lor j!1 woly �.,���rs� tUly ihal
�he w�ihbi�nitru�n�at,bl w�W��e��lved
Paoifia Crast Pprtn�r�� :Ina. '�nd roqP�d.d.�+'oonK.a-. ae ol .nid
p� ,
countY•.� '' . ,'�. k�
.-r . � :
� x� 0 ae etd R a ' : . :�,�, .. ,, . .;.
Nood Rivar. OR 5�031 ' :y,%u�r��p•Nq�',a'�rir.elor o�
. neeYhldM`���lon.Ex-
. . ' �Cqy�tytloik
' ' . ' � � � DOe ; 200000:721
� ' � Rect: 2�7290 Z7.Oo
' O1/19/2000 1A:33:04m
`Q AI�ND!lBNT TO:.FASEMT�NT
� :
� p� Peter A..�Savage and Atin Savage (herein "Savaqe") are
oNrers oC cer[ain ,�roperty at:1030a .SW 90`", Ti.qard, Oregon, mcre
\ pnrticulaz�ly described as .tih�:.W�h nqt n70County�f oregon, a��The
` Hl.oGk 19, TUWN OF MElZGER,
southerly 7 +� feet o� the property �f. 5avage is subicct to an
easement ior puFpases o'f installatioa and maintair.inq a SgWaC linr
which was recorded on A ri1 21'. 19N2 � DocumQ❑t Number 82010466 �
washington County: �ecords, .:
� 8, Pursuant. to, a .5et[lement• Aqr.eement executed among
m�� Savaqe, Judy C. �° Wood,: .Francis.:: W: ChapmBn and PacifiC Crest
� �, Partners� I�,hose aconditions�ha?�b ea satisfied1O�E'ineviewnFarme
�-� easement, t the north and west and is the
� o I,Lc, will acquire Che;:PrGperiy o
�Z sueces�ur in inte!rest to the easement .rights.
al �: a reed that the easemant
� e NOW, THEREFORC, it:_ i3 2lereby q
b � dcscrib«:d above is hereby aa�endi� �eethaof�the rproperty ownedeby
o is expanded to �he southerly
� � Sav3ge, d�s�ribed above� ' .Excep.t as attiended herein, the eaaement
q remains in full force :and effect. �savage acknvwledqes receipt of
� considaration for this �amendmen�t'. to th� easement.
� �, � � : ��: �. � . � -� � -��
Dated: � � „ . . . , pETEf� A. SAVAGE
,Y . • .. • . _��-�_���
,�fj . . '. �. . ANN SAVRGE . ,
� �// '
`-' /// . ' ' . .
; . .112299
PA,E 1 - AMENDMENT TO EASEMENT
. . . { ��
�: ' , ' • ' .
Feb 03 04 10: 16a Mur–ti� 50?^681674 p. 10
12/05/OJ FRI 08:44 FAR 1 505 d 7821 TICOR__TITLE �J012
, • � , ..,. •- • -
, ` ... _. ..... ,�
� .� .
. , � ,
�� •
J •� . i .
♦ .�•, . . .. . ,
STATE aF OREGON �� ' �1.
:) . SS,
� COUt�1TY OF WASHINGTON `1
This instrwaent .was .ack�tiowledged before me on rhis �
� �+y Peter A. Savage.
day. af .,.�+,a2L� .
' � • Oh'FICIAI S
BAFIBAM HASKItt�
STA'fE OF OREGON�� :i :). : � Hor,+nvPUnuc-0wecaa+
. . �;,,;1 �.�,••.,i��inV N0.922E�4d
: � � ; :'.S.S. � r�Ir1i''.tili:��•i. ;:��1�.���4,�B.C�
. Mr ca,�
COCAZTY oF '��� � . �
This I`in,ctrument; wa5 .acknor+ledqed on this �" day of
,�ZC27� : by Ant'i.5avage. —
�,��s�-�l.�a.�
, �� �NO'rARY PUBLIC F�R OREGON
OFFICIALB�K .. . .
C p�CI� : .
�oClfNtNPIB�1C�li�Oq : ! : :' � .
COW16d10MF�.�00p�91 � ' . .
bIY COii�SBK�'�•F PE8���� ' : ,°:��:: : '. .
.; . , ,
:I . . ..
:i . .' . .
. • ' •i • . . ' � •
. � ; ' ' •.
�; : . • , ' . .
,' .. ..
, , . .
.i .
L . , . .. , .. .
� .
.�
:I
opGE Z — AMF:NnM�NT 'P0 .�ASEMENT .112299
� • . �
i � . , .
:i . . . •
i� � ..
„ . � •
,I : . . ,
;� �
��
� • • ; • � .
� � � �
MEMORANDUM
To: City of Tigard, Planning
Arrtv: Matt Scheidegger
Fax #: 503-684-7297
Date: 12/17/03
Re: Fineview partitions, MLP 2003-00011 and MLP 2003-00012
MESSAGE: Hi Matt. As per our discussions, attached is a
memorandum of understanding revising my memo dated 12/08/03. We wifl
revise the preliminary construction drawings to reflect the statements in this
memo.
����� ���:
CiTY OF ��i;;_�.�,:
►'�tiAJ�1it�lGrCNt_�iPJ�.=�t�i,`v_�
■Phone 503. 624-4625 �Fax 503.968.1674 ■ejmurphy@aal.com
.. ,
Fineview Parritions
MLP 2003-00011
i. The screening that is required along the north property line of the flag pole next
to tax lot `906' could be either a fence or vegetation. If the property owner of
tax lot `9Q6' agrees and provides a landscape easement, a vegetative screen will
be placed on that property in the space between the retaining wall and the
property 1ine. Otherwise, a 6'-high wood fence will be constructed on the
property line, as shown on the construction drawings.
2. Street trees are required along the north side of the driveway, since the
developer is not able to retain the six larger fir trees along the south side of the
proposed driveway (within the flag pole area of MLP 2003-00012).
3. The tree plan submitted with the application is adequate.
4. The developer will construct a 5-foot wide sidewalk along the south side of the
shared driveways, in flag pole area of Parcel 1 created via MLP 2003-00012.
5. Street lights are not required.
6. No curb is required along the north side of the driveway.
MLP 2Q03-00012
1. The screening that is required along the south property iine of the flag pole next
to tax lot '1001' could be either a fence or vegetation.
2. New street trees are not required because there is not enough room for both
street trees and the sidewalk along the south side of the driveway.
3. The tree plan submitted with the application is adequate.
4. The City will not require a fire apparatus turn-around.
5. Street lights are not required.
6. The developer will construct a 5-foot wide sidewalk along the south side of the
flag pole. The sidewalk width includes the width of the curb.
cc. Dan Boyden
Craig Harris, LDC Design Group, Inc.
Kim McMi{1an, Development Review Engineer
ed,�,hyiaoy�,��►►�;�i,�nf�v�rvrsio3 2
' Dec. ,',.� {t�� 04: 55p Mu-�hy 5f"'9681674 p. 1
� � , �
h� , � � �
f
�
MEMORANDUM
To: City of Tigard, Planning
ATTN: Matt Scheidegger
Fax #: 503-684-7297
Date: 12/17/03
RE; Fineview partitions, MLP 2003-00011 and MLP 2003-00012
MESSAGE: Hi Matt. As per our discussions, attached is a
memorandum of understanding revisi�g my memo dated 12l08/03. We wil!
revise the preliminary construction drawings to reflect the statements in this
memo.
■Phone �og, 624-4625 ■Fax 503.968.Y67q ■ejmurphyC�aoi.com
Dec l6 Q� 04: 55p M�—ohy 5�'9691674 p. 2
Fineview Partinons
MLP 2003-00011
� 1. The screening that is requi�ed along the north property line of the flag pole next
to tax 1ot '906' could be either a fence or vegetation. If the property owner of
tax lot '906' agrees and provides a iandscape easement, a vegetative screen will
be placed on that property in the space between the retaining wall and the
property line. Otherwise, a 6'-high wood fence will be constructed on the
property line, as shown on the construction drawings.
2. Street trees are required along the north side of the driveway, since the
developer is not able to retain the six larger fir trees along the south side of the
proposed driveway (within the flag pale area of MLP 2003-00012).
3. The tree plan submitted with the application is adequate.
4. The developer will construct a 5-foot wide sidewalk along the south side of the
shared driveways, in flag pole area of Parcel 1 created via MLP 2003-00012.
5. Street lights are not required.
6. No curb is required along the north side of the driveway.
MLP 2003-00012
i. The screening that is required along the south property {ine of the flag poie next
to tax lot �1001' could be either a fence or vegetation.
2. New street trees are not required because there is not enough room for both
street trees and the sidewalk along the south side of the driveway.
3. The tree plan submitted with the applicatjon is adequate.
4. The City will not require a fire apparatus turn-around.
5. Street lights are not required.
6. The deveioper will construct a 5-foot wide sidewalk along the south side of the
flag pofe. The sidewalk width incfudes the width vf the curb.
cc, Dan Boyden
Craig Harris, LDC Design Group, Inc.
Kim McMillan, Development Review Engineer
edmurphy/boyden/fineview/mcufax4/!2ll5/03 2
�
- • �Q�
:,
� � � � � , .
�
�
MEMORANDUM
To: City of Tigard, Planning
Arrtv: Matt Scheidegger
Date: 12/8/03
Re: Fineview partitions, MLP 2003-00011 and MLP 2003-00012
MESSAGE: Hi Matt. A few days ago, LDC Design Inc. submitted
construction drawings for these two partitions. You and Kim may have noticed
that the drawings are not exactly in synch with my statement of
understanding memo to you dated September 25, 2003. Saving the existing
trees along the south side of the flag pole of MLP 2003-00012 (tax lot '1000')
turned out to be problematic. On the advise of Raymond Myer, an arborist
(see attached letter) and LDC Design Group, Inc., Mr. Boyden decided to
remove all six of these trees. The City approval did not include a requirement
to retain those particular trees or mitigate their loss.
The following pages reflect our revised understanding: ���aq�
.e�`��
i �
�`���,N������� =��;��
?���'!�/��G
F��h._
�
�Phone 503. 62¢-4625 ■Fax 503.968.Y6�¢ ■ejmurphy@aol.com
�
�
�+
��' , . .
��; Fineview Partitions
�
MLP 2003-00011
1. The screening that is required along the north property line of the flag pole next
to tax lot '906' could be either a fence or vegetation. If the property owner of
tax lot `906' agrees, a vegetative screen will be placed on that property, in the
space between the retaining wall and the property line. Otherwise, a 6'-high
wood fence will be constructed on the property line, as shown on the
construction drawings
2. Street trees are required along the north side of the dri�eway, since the
developer is not able to retain the six larger fir trees along the south side of the
proposed driveway (within the flag pole area of MLP 2003-00012). However,
because there is not enough room physically to create a suitable planter strip,
the developer will plant 4 or 5 trees elsewhere on the site in lieu of the street
trees.
3. The tree plan submitted with the application is adequate.
4. The developer will construct a sidewalk along the south side of the shared
driveways, in flag pole area of the Parcel 1 created via MLP 2003-00012.
MLP 2003-00012
1. The screening that is required along the south property line of the flag pole next
to tax lot '1001` could be either a fence or vegetation.
7 �2� New street trees are not required because there is not enough room for both
street trees and the sidewalk along the south side of the driveway.
:�' 3. The tree plan submitted with the application is adequate.
�i�_4. The City will not require a fire apparatus turn-around.
,
�.= 5. The developer will construct a sidewalk along the south side of the flag pole.
There are also a couple items on the construction drawings that either were not
specifically required, or that are different from our previous understanding. I have
discussed these items with Craig Harris, LDC Design Group, and he concurs with
the Following camments:
1. Two street lights are shown on the construction drawings. These were not
specifically required as a condition of approval, and normally street lights are
ednuaphy/boydenlfineview/mnnfax9/12/O8/03 2
�!�
Fineview Parritions
not required on private driveways. In order to reduce the developer's capital
costs and the resident's on-going operating costs, and also eliminate the
negative impact of these lights on the adjacent properties, we are requesting
that no street lights be required. If the City agrees, these should be stricken
from the submitted construction drawings.
, � � The sidewalk width is shown on the drawings as 5' wide. My understanding was
• that the City would allow a 42"-wide sidewalk in this development, since the
sidewalk only serve a couple homes. (Attached is a copy of my memo dated
September 25, 2003, and your letter agreeing with the points in that memo.) It
may be that because the six existing �r trees are being removed after all, the
City again wants a 5'-wide sidewalk. However, we would propose sticking to the
42"-width, which is more than adequate to serve the pedestrian needs of the
residents. If the City agrees, the sidewalk width should be changed to 42" in
the submitted construction drawings.
3. The extruded curb along the north side of the driveway is not necessary, and
should be deleted from the submitted construction drawings. If the City agrees,
that curb should be eliminated in the submitted construction drawings.
On a different subject, I am enclosing one copy of the planting plan for the
landscaping of the wetland buffe� area. I will also send a copy to CWS's far its
review and comment.
Again, thank-you for working with us on these partitions. We appreciate the
flexibility and responsiveness shown by you and Kim.
cc. Dan Boyden
Craig Harris, LDC Design Group, Inc.
Kim McMillan, Development Review Engineer
ed,�hy�y�����i�fa�i��ros�o3 3
�x , .
� �
�''.
October 2, 2003
CITY OF TIGAItD
Ed Murphy
OREG�N
9875 SW Murdock
Tigard, Or 97223
Dear Ed:
This letter is in regard to your memo dated September 25th 2003. The summary
of your memo is an accurate depiction of the issues raised and agreed to in our
meeting on September 24th 2003. I have made a copy of the memo for the files
and placed case notes in the City's tracking system indicating the changes we
agreed to.
If you have further concerns about the Fineview Partitions do not hesitate to call
me. I am available to answer questions and otherwise assist you as may be
required at 503-639-4171, extension 2437. Office hours are from 8:00 a.m. to
5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. If I am not available, please leave your name
and phone number so that I can call you back as soon as possible.
Sincerely,
�
t�-c� 2,�.
athew Scheidegge
Associate Planner
13125 SW Hall Blvd„ Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD(503)684-2772
__. __ ���� __ __ -- - .. _ _..__.._ .__ --_- _--_ __ ._ .-- --
. �� ���
�L �
�lA
V4/1mri�J
ARBORIST REPORT
Addre�s of��e Repo�t: FiReview Fa�r� Developr�rer�
SW 90`h
Tigard, OR
Date of the Report October �, 20II3
Report Submitted To: Ed Murphy & P�ssociates PH: 503-624-4625
Attn: Ed Murphy F�: 5f}�-96$-�t6�4
I met with Ed Murphy o� October 9, 2003 at the site to discuss the pros and cons of
sa�fr�g the 6 Doag4as Fi� t�ees on th�sou�hr s+de o�the-prapose��rivev�ay�.
Herein,is a list of pros and cons for your considerations. Please call if you want to
discuss ttreRr further:
PR �
1. There are 6 medium size Douglas Firs that if saved could provide a nice
b�rf�er o€�oFrage sereeni�►g betwee� �xis�+ng hor�es-artd �Fi� r�ew
development elements.
2. Environmentally it is a{ways in our best interest to retain trees for obvious
reas.ons.
3. Yeu woul�#�ot �iav�*to �r►itiga�e wtE� �tew s�reeE t�ee�
C2N�
1.. 4� tktie 6 �rees, 4 a€ chem are shavuictig se�ere s+g�s a€ s��e�s, possibt�c
retated to previous excavation or other root damaging work near them.
�n�o€�kt�Ftrs k�ad lost its o�ig��a+Eo�r anci k�as so�e poc� str��rx-aG
developments because of that. Since they are already in poor condition,
they may �o� s��ive furtheF roat da�ag�..
RRSidontial and C�mmPtr.ial Spraying• Fertilizing•Pruning•Landscape Installation•Landscape Maintenance•Consuitation
MEM6ER; lV�tionat Ar�o�ist-1�ssveia�io�• Iflier�►atlonal Seeie�y e�Afbo�et�lture•OregorrA�sc>eiaticm of Nurs2ryrne+�
Oregon Golf Course Superintendents'Associatfon•Oregon Landscape Contractors Association
Siate �icensed Tr�o Sorvice#B2G35• Candscapo Contractor�565�•CTiemical Application:tp00231 • In�urcaci
P_O. Box 156C-Lake Oswega,O(� 97035•543-635-3165•Vancauver 360-737-2fi46 • FAX 5t)3-G35-t 549
Yi�iF our website at wwvu.tteeC�u�ac/sc-,�e�.c:om
,
2. The construction of the driveway is go►ng to cover up 50°�0 of the root
systee�ts, �p�o �59/Q o��he easterly �Fees. �his ala��evttki ki11 the�Fees�
however I've seen t�ees survive such trauma, if precautions are taken.
3. �Fee pFo�ee�io�r pla�s w+1E k�a�re�o-be deueloped afld adk►e�ed �a i�ycw
choose to keep the trees. There will be costs related to that for the plans,
si�e�i�s b�r �k►e arbo�is�, protect+o�► fe�i�g, P�tr�+�9 and re��dia} care�o
help encourage new root growth. (Cost: Approximately $3,000 - $4,000)
4. Sa�t�tg tFie trees wtEF�eE}ttire Eittle�a�a gFa��e�anges sa as �4 pFevent
further root loss. Careful considerations for trenching to accommodate
utiti�ies.
S. Tr�e #4 (aumbeF treesuuest to east - 1 thXU 6}should be remouedto
accommodate the driveway design.
6. Savir�g E�tree�wilf�FiggeF art invofve�e�►� Fespo►�se ay ��t��igafd Eit�
Arborist. Not say(ng Matt Stein's involvement is a negative issue,
havue� E� uvii� c�ea� ►�ore paPe�work and�i�x�e ta acEO�modate perm+�s,
site visits and tree preservation measures all monitored by the City and
EFie s+t�ar�+$t.
7. E�s��r.te�iorr �e�k�ods r�ay �ave�a be a�e�e��o-aeEOr�r�odaE��oot
protection. This could increase the cost of site development.
8. ul�imate►y �kte trees eor,It�die a�d the eos� �o� FeF1'tova+wottl�}be z �e 3
times more expensive once fences, walks, �oadways and homes are in
pla�r �ktaFr t� �ernoved nowf.
If I can be of further service, please give me a call,
ReSpe l�y, �
,,� ,���...ir?��
Raymond Myer, General Manager
Tree C�re & Landscapes URlimite�, fRe.
Certified Arborist by the International
�oCiety of arbor�CUttur�, tiC. #" Rlrt QI6�
Oregon Landscape Contractors Lic. # 11604
Qregon 6ept. of Rgricufture, Commerciaf
Pesticide Applicators License # 00187
TE}TA� F�.�3
l
�
� o . Qo
A
i41 ���
Q �� ! #
�
� �
lo� �° � • •
0
g ����. ' .
..;::.:,.:._s__�:;;;.
._,:
:�: ��. � :, ��`��.;:
. a � .
� � �
o �� •
� :. :i.
. � ,.
°o ����:
. �
Q � :a� .
. � �� •
, . � ..;;,.
e�M '' ,. ' .'•,
op � ` .;
��o Q'-.,` �,''•,'.
:�i + '-_._1'�
�*�o Q .•�. .�y .a
R��ti � � �•
r ow k/,y ���i� ��
• ...,._...-- �
� + � • Q4
. �
•
�
��
I
� � � � FINEVIEVU FARM.LLC � �
� � $ 15500 SW JAY STREET P����'
4 � � ; M���� BEAVERTON,OR. 97006 �N �
' v
• rt
.�
0
•C
]
I
7
n
u
'NATIVE PLANTS' L�GEND '
C
n
n
u
PLRNT SYh1BOl QUANTIIY BOTAN:CAL NAME COMMON NAME NOTES �
��J c`
05 ALNUS RUBRA RED ALDEk �
• OS ' fKAXINUS LAT!FOUA ORPGON ft511
• 05 PSEUD�TSUGA MENZIFSII DOUGLAS FIR
03 PR1JkU5 EMARGINATA. 81TTER CHERRY
�� 05 DUPRCUS GARRYANA ORFGON V��F11TE OAK �
—'t + Q5 TliWA PUCATA WESTERN RED CEDAR �
g�� - �
_ _. . __ __ i c
RUBS �
- - -- _ �
08 AMELA�CHtFR A�NIFCUA WESTERN SPRVICEBERRY �
08 O�MlE21A CERl�SIFORMIS I►JD!AN PLUM
+ 09 � RIBES SAVGUIV�`JM RPD FLOWteING CURRl1NT
• DG ° ROS?,GYt,�tVOCARPA � �ALDHIP ROSE
t ; �� eOSA NUT�C.'�N.4 -NOOTKA ROSE �
<
. � . - ,
08 SAM6UCU5 Rr�GcMOSA RED ELDER6ERRY j
r � _.. . . �
c
� �
/�.. I �"�-, /�_� -`
` � �
i ;
i ', ExiSTiniG OAr� r � � E�ciST�NG A5`i j „ j Ex15TING DECI�UO�JS
i �� v-+ 1 ,
\� � �.� � � '•� /
--�'� v��s�' ��
"�_ .
;
C
r
r
r
\ -
S�p .' 1 O� 02: OOp Murphy 5039681674 p. l
J 1
� • • ; . � .
FAX TRANSMITTAL MEMD
To: City of Tigard, Planning 1�t/��� z� �
ATTN: Matt Scheidegger �� �� l Z
D
Fax#: 503-6$4-7297
Date: 9/12/03
R�: Fineview partitions
ME55AGE: Hi Mait. I left a vaice mail for you yesterday regarding
the possible sidewafk requirement, and t�e impact on the mature fir trees on
tax !ot '1000'. (I am having some difficutty understanding how the City can
process the two Fineview applications as separate partitions -- like it did in
May of 200� -- and at the same time now �equire a sidewalk, as if it is a four-
lot subdivision with a private street. My understanding is that, if the two
partitions came in separately in time, the City would not require a sidewalk of
either partition, So, to me, it seems unjusti�ed by the Code, and unnecessary
from a practical standpoint. But, be that as it may...)
Before you and Kim said that you might requ�re a sidewalk, I was
exploring wikh the applicants the idea of pushing the shared driveway to the
north property line af tax lot `901' in order to save at least the large 34" fir
tree, and maybe some of the other five fir trees as well. With the requirernent
of a 5' sidewaik, that does not appear to be possible.
However, if the City is flexible on the wi h of the sidewalk, I think
there may be a way to place it along the south property line of tax lat '1000'.
If the shareci driveway was then constructed afong the north property line of
tax iot `901', it would leave a 6'-wide space for the trees. This is iilustrated on
the attached drawing. Around the 34" diameter tree and perhaps some of the
others, the sidewalk would have to be narrower -- probably 36" wide. (I also
think the paved turn-around area could be built around the trees, as shown).
The applicants are receptive to the idea of saving the fir trees, if the
idea does not skow down or otherwise cause problems with their approval of
these partitions. My suggestion to you is, if you decide you are going to
require a sidewaik along one side of the shared driveway, at least write the
condition so as to give the owrters flexibility on the width of the sidewalk.
That way, they can try and squeeze it in between the south property line and
the trees, and hopefully preserve many of these trees. (See TDC
18.810.030.A.7). Thanks Matt.
cc. Dan Boyden
�Phone 503• �24-4625 ■Fax 503.968.16�¢ ■ejmurphy�aal.com
�_
� � i ;;<,;.
• � �
•
•�
/ .
, ' :
/
,4 �
.. , /
� ' , • � �
}��'�� .:
_r..,� , �..�- . , � • �
�
: � d� �. . '•�.`q�`�c,.',►�'.iA,"�,t!'f�'i�� r'� tt< i r -. 'r . � � .ca f� 3-...�.._ s +: . .Ir . r .. : .
l�t.+c .�r� �s �"r�r�Jt:'.�.R. -- s }� r� .�r�E �«�.:.R -� '_ } . .; .
i' d.V"K'("�'f.�"'� - ' 4 8 �'�.
�` 1��+R�I
'��"" �„'��r$' ,21, W.l�. .,t �t .., m�4a•a..zl_ ',
��.'�`,.�1.`F � r r a s _i!'i. .sf a .c w � ..L'."' 'F.iG
. � rtY'iMy�, �!f �' ti..r�r F. ,� . ._» ._ .._.
f.'� r?�xG':y�'`.�i"^�. � �;'3 > d��Ci"r�tf"��.�,�p�°�'�nr���Si�.�.�..i�� dr,. '4'���. �_.'�{.Ey�t.'f�r.'c,++� . xa��. ,�A .�4 °:� .1_.� � �
.w_ ' y.. _., : " �. •�' •. ��% �!(�%� _ �vt� 'F � �
� � �/1 �i/�;��5` r � � •
f.�IT_I:�. r.l�.i'i.i`��t'♦ ��.�1 i\1I1�\\'`►• �.�: .��. :��i':��1'���'��� _ .�,',�. '� \
1.!.�. �� ��� �rII � ��I�i> � ��1 � r.� �r � � ��1 � • �... , �
t���s�����1�����r�►�1��1ils��►L/LJ►���w�V►-�fZ���:T�-�.A.�\� .:�.., ty;._ .••`+.-
,;r ,'�s y;.
•r' . ! �'•.. �:��� �r,
/ � �
!9' S�J.
� 'p.�st ;;� '' `,�+.�i�y '� '�.
�*� �r.Y;'� �.:!'�.
�'... �� 'f:.. :�,"/� -
--- __�
i - -. �I` u_' ,.-_ -
,r. ' `
(,'r.:
E.:
(F_ .
�
k� �
:�4_.
�
��
[ � FS��'. � •��
, � �J� -', �
�1 /f�� % � :r_., k
I{y�
.��; S ��`yt {iyj
� �
� ,' ' �` � •
A
�-�.�" F'._
• N
, � � � � , •
FAX TRANSMITTAL MEMO
To: City of Tigard, Planning �� �� Z��� � 2
� �
ArTN: Matt Scheidegger
Faa#: 503-6847297
Date: 9/19/03
Re: Fineview partitions, MLP 2003-00011 and MLP 2003-00012
MESSAGE: Matt, we have a few concerns about the conditions of
approval for these two minor partition applications, and would like to meet
with you as soon as possible to clarify and hopefully revise some of the
conditions that we feel are unworkable. The following memo presents our
concerns, and provides some recommendations.
RECEIVED
S�P 19 1003
C1TY OF TlLiARD
�A�M(�1E1V0lNEERtNG
cc. Dick Bewersdorff, Planning Manager
Kim McMillan, Development Review Engineer
■Phone 503. 624-4625 ■Fax 503.968.1674 ■ejmurphy�aol.com
� Finevizw parritions
frontage, and the two tax lots created from tax lot 1000 share 15' of frontage. As
illustrated on the attached pages (Attachment 1 and 2), Parcei 1 of MLP 2003-
00011 will have an access easement over Parcel 2. That's why Parcel 2 shows both
a gross and a net square footage. Similarly, Parcel 2 of MLP 2003-00012 will have
an access easement over Parcel 1. Again, that's why Parcel 1 shows both a gross
and a net square footage. Technically, unless there were private restrictions
prohibiting it, the owners could construct a fence or concrete barrier down the
center of the two 10'-wide shared driveways.
To ensure that both sets of two parcels will have the right to use the other half of
the 20'-wide paved area, the applicant plans to record additional instruments
granting that right. Each lot will then not only meet the minimum requirements,
but in addition, have the right to use their neighbors' 10'-wide driveway. It is
important to note that the applicant does not have to establish these additional
easements in order to meet the City's access requirements; each partition meets
the minimum access requirements without the use of their neighbor's 10'-wide
driveway.
We did � create a private street. Although the staff report uses that term in the
staff report, staff also uses the terms "shared flag lot driveway" and "access drive".
Perhaps my mention of"cross easements" in the supplemental information dated
September 8, 2003 was confusing, as that terminology was not used in the
application that was approved in 2001 (which was, of course, exactly the same
design). In my opinion, granting each owner an additional right to use a portion of
their neighbors' driveway, as well as their own legal access, does not somehow turn
the shared driveways into a private street.
Fire apparatus turn-around.
A condition of approval for MLP 2003-00012 requires a fire apparatus turnaround.
Actually, the staff report requirement for a fire apparatus turn around is confusing.
The condition of approval clearly states that it is required. But the staff report
states on page 7 "Tualatin Fire and Rescue did not indicate that the access to the
ednuPphy/ftneview/response/9/19/03 2
, Finev�ew partitions
diameter are being retained. Submitting a t�ee plan was a condition of the 2001
approval, and the tree plan was subsequently completed.
Proposal.
The conditions of approval for these two partitions are not really workable as
written. Here are my recommendations, which will result in a paved area like the
one shown in the construction drawings, plus an added sidewalk along one side of
one of the flagpoles.
■ Delete the requirement for a �re apparatus turnaround as a condition of
approval for MLP 2003-00012. Instead, the final plat will show the lot line as
per the attached drawing (Attachment 5), so the shared driveway easement
across the flag pole of Parcel 1 for Parcel 2, measured along the northern
property line of parcel 1, will measure no more than 150 feet in length.
• Instead of requiring street trees along both sides of the two driveways, let the
developer plant 10 new trees on the four lots, in an area where they will have a
better chance of survival, and where they will provide more benefit to the future
owners.
� Delete the requirement for "NO PARKING - FIRE LANE - TOW AWAY ZONE, ORS
98.810 -98.812" signs on posts, with a 7' clear space above grade level to the
bottom of the sign. This is not a fire apparatus access road. It is two private
shared driveways.
� Delete the requirement for a tree plan, as one has al�eady been submitted.
Alternative proposal.
As I suggested in my fax memo to you dated September 12, we would like to
explore methods of saving some or all of the six fir trees. In that memo, I said that
the developer is open to the idea if the idea does not slow down or otherwise cause
problems with their approval of these partitions. Given the City standards and the
lot configurations, this may not be possible. It would result in a paved area
different than the one shown in the construction drawings, but the partition plats
would remain the same. Here again is the idea:
edmrvphy/fineview/response/9/19/03 4
`,y .
• . . . � � � i i ��"a��w�en} I i .
� �-- ----- �.__.
� i i
� � TL 904 I I � �
I I
I � I � � I
I I � � I
I w I � �
ir---------!
� � Z � � � L__
I > � �-------.--�--� � TL 805
� Q � �------------�
� � � TL 902 � TL 905 �
I � I I I (�—
i � I I I
� I
I
cn I �---=------ _ I
TL 100 � � � TL 96i� `�O6 TL �9@8 �f�1 � �
� I � TL 8 �
� � � 00 �
� � � � /' L-
l �
I �
---------� � � ---- - - ......� �
_E STREET -� �
105'
U 1 OO' �
s�• ry� T� �-36i ►oao -
--------� � TL 1001 �-'�...
� � � 6'� Parce! 1 � ' .
I �
.�'. ' . '
I � �SPwte�t od2✓ Net: �,933 sq.ft. �� ,• � . ,
� L ��s� Gross: 11.,297 sq.ft. ,�o , ' • • ,
� � /�cWcel I � I�l�'�t� o• ` / ��. ++. ` +
I . :��. . .
� I o �� ' �..%. . . . : .r.
TL 100 � Parcel 2 ` ` ' '
��������.��� / �I ♦. • • ♦ y�f•
� � 10,094 sq.ft. � :� � �. . ` . `�� „/ �•,
. y
I 'S � ♦
♦ � •. • .
i i � /�.�+. ` . �. . i' ,,•'�
.���
� � TL 1002 �• - ` ..`•� + ,`, � .+�„ '; �-.� ,�ye
� I /. . . . . ,✓
� � �y� :-: `. .+ . ,...-
( (---------- as ' a2' ' .% ,
I I '�' _`_�C
� � •i . P��.
I � TL 1101
� � ��� O�
� �.. ' �Cr
I � m.1 .
I I I �_+ `` O� /�,
.
. .'
I
I � ' ` �P ��
� . r---- ------r------------ � ` Q- ��
� j TL 1102 I TL 1100 � TL 401 ��/ �
. � I I � i� TL
� I I �
I I I �i� �i�
I I
j I � ��� � �i
----- ---J L----------�--- ---,� � -- -- - - - --- -
- . _. i �-
— i �
------, �------------�-------��-------1-------
�' � � � ,� I I
-�-�- - -��-10 ---1— �- - - - - - - - --� rJ�, PL-8 '����N7 S
' ' I '
� I �-��.���:���
TA901�T � i ' 99-17—P1
� '-�� L - - - - u
_.:� _ _ _ _ �
.' O � AP-8
� O
� � V.,
�.�� •
r. ����
'-•.. -J --------,{-) ---- -�-- �]----- -- f J ---�� a ❑
— - I
.' I
io�' I
,,ti•�� I
' ' FI-34 ' �I-26 �
t + —
� �- -. U—�=�(�---p- p—�y� � FI-26
� iod' 20 .�y. �_20_ ` _
� .. . ______ __ � �,. —
---------- � � I
� +' �1 -- -_ �`� _ _ -
i � �`• �- \�`.
� ( , . .
i . I j i ��.\ �`�
�-- _ -� � � '
� C — I \`\ ,;\.
. 1 ` _ —� ——1 �
i � TAX LOT � I ��
I ioot I i �
; I I �
. - - , - - - � I DEC-28 � AP-22
� � �
� . . -� I
IL-------J _ I
i ----------- - --------------------- ��
� - - - - ___ _ _ �c � i
..
� ----�
99-18—P2
� � CH-12
' `''°,�>;' DEAO)
_ ` �.:
� <�Y:
TAX LOT
1002
�— _�
-_ , j � , � ' /�tta��nenf S I
' � � � �-- ----- � � E---
� � � � � �
� � TL 904 � � I n
� � I
� � j I I I
� I I � I �
I w I � I
i i i r---------j�--
� W !---------�- i
I > I -1 ------ ---- TL 805
� ¢ � I �- �
� � � TL 902 � TL 905 �
I
� � � � � r
� � � � � �
' � i I---------- i
, . . -----------,
TL 100 � � TL 901 TL 1000 �` I
� I I / TL 800 �
1 � I
I � . f'� L
� � � �
I �
----------� � � �--- - - ......,/
PLE STREET '"
_ _. U 1OS' �
100' ��s� ry�
TL 1301
----------, � TL 1001 r��
I � `� 61� Parcel ? j.+ .
� I Net: �,933 sq.ft. �� .' . .
I � � Gross: 11,297 sq.ft. ,yp � - •
I � Js� 1/ '. �� . a• •
I I \ / /'v ♦ ` ♦ � v
I I � . • • � ` • • •n+ ♦
/ �'
TL 100 � ------ � Parce! 2 `� �� . ` . + . � �
� �---- :' . . _ ` `+y-�.
� � io,os4 sq.rt. �y '� 5 . . . ` . �
�:� . . . . .
� � . . ,� ,
. j � T �� ��.� . `. ` . ' .
L 1002 ,.�''� . . . r„ ; . .'�-.
� 1 .. . . . . , .�..
I i �� +.��'.' , 'r.- ,' /
� 43' 82' . . . �•
� � �------- -- �' �_
� � .
I ( '1 \
i i n �ioi •�� �P
i � �.� �O
i � = � a�
� � � , • �. p ,
I i ` `' OQ,� /,i
� ------ --- + • Q-
� . r---- --_---r- - - . /,
� I TL 1102 I TL 401 �
� I I TL 1100 i i
. � I I � �
� � I I i� i�
I I � �
j I I �� ��
I � � i� �
------ ---J L----------�--- --� �----- - - ----
-- � i
� ' � - ---- ---
---------� �------------�----- -t�-- -T-
l i i � ,� I i
Se� OL 03 03: 36p Murphy 5039681674 P, 1
i
I
� � � �
♦ � , r
FAX TRANSMITTAL MEMO
To: City of Tigarcf, Planning
AnN: Matt Scheidegger
F�►x #: 503-684--7297
DATE: 9/2/03
RE; Fineview partitions - impact study
MESSAGE: Hi Matt. As you requested, enclosed are impact studies
� for the two Fineview partitions. These should satisfy the requirements of TDC
18.390.040.e. Please contact me if you need anything else. Thanks Matt.
cc. Dan Boyden
/Phone So�. 62¢-462g ■Fax 5og.968.i674 �ejmurphy�aoI.com
, Se� O1 03 03: 37p Murph� 5039681674 p. 4
l
i'ineview—MLP 2003-(IOpr2
SUPPLEMENTAL TO FINEVIEW PARTITION#2 APPLICATION, MLP 2003-00�12
Section 18.390.040 of the Tigard Development Code requires an impact
study,
e. Include an impacl study.The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on
public facilities and services.The study shall address,at a minimum, the transportation
system,inciuding bikeways,the drainage system, the parics system,the water system, the
sewer system,and the nase impacts of the development. For each public facitity system and
type of impact,the study sha11 propose improvements necessary to meet City standards and to
minimize the impact of the development on U�e public at large,public facilities systems,and
affected private property users. 1n situations where the Commumty Develapment Code
requires ttie dedicatic�n of reai property interests, the applicant shall either speci�caliy concur
w�th the dedication requirements,or provide evidence which supporis the cvnciusion that the
real pro,perty dedication requirement is not roughly proporciot�a[ to the projected imQacts of
the deve[opment.
Impact AnaEysis.
1. Trans�ort��tion svstem. There are just under 10 trips per day
generated fram a single-family detached home. There will be two homes
built on this property as a result of this partitian, which will add aimost 20
trips per day oni:o SW 90i'' Avenue, a local street and other streets such as
SW Locust, a collector street. No new streets will be created. This amount
of trafFic on the existing streets would not be considered significant, or
degrade the level of service on the street. There is nothing in the
Transpartation System plan indicating a capacity problem in this area. (The
closest recommended improvements are improvements to the intersection of
SW Ha{I and SW �ak, widening of SW Hall to five lanes, and widening of SW
Greenburg north of SW Lo�ust to five lanes). No dedication of right-of-way is
necessary, according to the City Engineer.
SW Hall, which is oniy about 1300 feet away from this development, is a
transit route.
There are no bicycle lanes on SW 90`" Avenue, or on any of the �earby
streets. No biEceways are identified on the pedestrian/bikeway plan through
this property, The amount of bicycle traffic that will be generated from the
two new homes is not significant.
The new homes wil! contribute to the funds available for system-wide
improvements through payment of the Transpartation Improvement Fee
(TIF).
Z• Drainaae The property drains to the east and the south, towards the
wetland area. Drainage from the shared driveway wilf be piped to the edge
of the wetland through a 12" concrete pipe, and then released into a riprap
pad. The site plai-� wil! accommodate the upstream drainage adjacent to this
development. The partition will not significantly increase the arnount of
runoff into the public system, Clean Water Services has already provided a
r�Iitn imhvR.ac vx�iafrc/fi rwvi�u k'f/cnnn/Q/ll?/!lq
�
, Se� O1 03 03: 37p Murphy 5039681674 p. 5
. . � �
Fineview-fv1LP 2CX13-(1Op12
service letter, accepting the proposed drainage system. The new homes wif!
contribute to the funds available for system-wide impravements through
payment of the water quality fee (in-fieu-of},
3, P_drks•There will be some use of nearby parks, such as Metzger Park,
Residents may also use the school grounds during non-school hours. The
new homes will contribute to the funcfs available For system-wide park
improvements tl�rough payment of the Parks SDC.
4� �er• The water system has the capacity to serve this
development. There are two public water lines available in SW 90t'' Avenue,
a 16" line and a 6" line. There will be no significant impact to the water
system as a resuft of this two-lot developmenfi. The new homes will
contribute to the funds available for system-wide improvements through
payment of the Water SDC.
5. Sewer. The sewer system has the capacity to serve this
development. T�here is an existing sewer main in SW 90th Avenue. These
iots will connect to the sewer through a sewer line that wil! be constructed in
an easement between tax lots IS135AA01001 and IS135AA01002, adjacent
to this development. There wilf be no signiffcant impact to the sewer system
as a result of this two-lot development. The new homes will contribute to the
funds availab�e for system-wide improvements through payment of the
Sewer SDC.
6. Noise. There wilf be construction-related noise
generated during
construction of the driveway and utiiities, and then the homes. After
construction, the��e will be no signiFicant noise impact on the neighborhood.
P�imi imh�i.Q�acenri:ilre/f�i nPVi Pw�k�lci mn/p!n?/(1�
7.
� Page I of 1
Matt Scheidegger- Fineview partitions
�
From: <Ejmurphy@aol.com>
To: <MATTS@ci.tigard.or.us>,<dboyden@gorge.net>
Date: 9/30/03 5:43 PM
Subject: Fineview partitions
Hi Matt. This e-mail is to confirm our phone conversation earlier this ��� � � ^_
aftemoon regarding clarification of the conditions of approval for MLP 2003-0001 I ��
and MLP 2003-000 1 2. 1 understood you to say that the statemenu[made in my
memo to you dated September 25,2003,is an accurate representation of what we
agreed to at our meeting of September 24 with you and Kim McMillan. Further, � �� (�
you plan to wri[e a letter or memo to me verifying that understanding. Your
letter or memo clarifying the conditions of approval will then supersede the
conditions of approval as written in the staff decision.
The reason for this e-mail is because the appeal period on MLP 2003-OOOI 1
ended today at 5:00 PM,and the appeal period for MLP 2003-OOOl2 ends[omorrow at
5:00 PM. We did not want to let the appeal period pass without some
confirmation of the changes or clarifications we agreed to at our meeting.
Thanks Matt.
Ed Murphy
�03-624-462�
file://C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\GW}00002.HTM 10/2/03
Sep z4 Q3 03: 04p Mu� tiy Sr `681674 p. l
� �
♦ ' � .
FAX TRANSMITTAL MEMO ����SlI1Ia �N�Q���B
aae�il�o.�li�
To: City of Tigard, Plannin
/0�03 ���� c 7. c��S
ATTN: Matt Scheidegger Eo
Fag#: 503-68q.-7297 Q�n I����
Date: 9/ZS/U3
�� Fineview partitions, MLP 2003-OQ011 and MLP 2003-00012
MeSSAGE: Hi Matt. Thanks for meeting with Dan Boyden and me
yesterday. I thought the meeting was productive, and resolved the issues I
raised in my memo of September 25, 2003. This memo is to follow-up on our
discussion yesterday regarding these two partitions. I don't know whether or
not you will have to issue an amended decision, or if this memo will suffice for
the record.
MLP 20Q3-00011
• The screening that is required along the north property fine of the flag pole
next to tax lot '906' could be a fence o� vegetation. If the property owner
oP tax lot '906' agrees, a vegetative screen could be placed on that
property, in the space between the �etaining wall and the property line.
Ot�erwise, a 6'-high wood fence wi(I be constTUCted on the property line.
• Street trees are not required if the developer is instead able to retain ail or
most of the six larger fir trees along the south side of the proposed
driveway (within the flag pole area of MLP 2003-00012).
• The tree plan submitted with the appiication is adequate.
■ The developer will construct a sidewalk along the south side of the shared
driveways, in flag pole area of the Parcel i created via MLP 2003-�0012.
� The driveway area will be shifted 4 to 5 feet to the north to the north so
that it is adjacent to the property line of tax lot `906', which will ailow the
developer to retain the fir trees adjacent to tax lot '1001'.
�Phone 5og, 62�-4625 ■Fax 503•968.1674 ■ejmurphy@aol.com
Sep 24 03 03: 04p Mur^hy 5���681674 p, 2
MLP 2003-000i2
■ The screening that is required along the south ro e line of the fla
p P rtY g pole
next to tax lot `1001' does not have to be a fence, but coufd be vegetation,
■ New street trees are not required if the developer instead is able to retain
all or most of the six larger fir trees along the south side of the proposed
driveway.
• The tree plan submitted with the application is adequate.
■ The City wil! not require a fire apparatus turn-around.
• The developer will construct a 42"'wide sidewalk installed along the south
side of the flag pole, meandering as necessary to preserve trees and
shrubs within the 9' - 10' space available.
- The driveway area will be shifted 4 to 5 Feet to the north to the north so
that it is adjacent to the property line of tax iot '906', which will allow the
developer to retain the fir trees.
Again, thank-you for working wi�h us on these partitions. We appreciate the
flexibility and responsiveness shown by you and Kim.
cc. Dick Bewersdorff, Planning Manager
Kim McMillan, Development Review Engineer
Page 2