The URL can be used to link to this page

CPA2012-00002 120 DAYS = N/A DATE MAILED: 12-13-2012 �° � :. .. . ,. CITY OF TIGARD �� ;� ; .� Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE CITY COUNCIL Case Number: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA) 2012-00002 Case Name: ADOPT WEST BULL MT. CONCEPT PLAN RECOMMENDED LAND USES AND ASSOCIATED POLICIES Applicant's Name/Address: Cit��of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard,OR 97223 Owner's Names/Addresses: N A Address of Property: River Terrace Area A FINAL ORDER INCORPORATING THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT(ORDINANCE NO. 12-12). THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION r1ND CITY COUNCIL HAVE REVIEWED THE APPLICANT'S PLr1NS, NARRATIVE, MAT'ERIr1LS, AND COMMME.NTS OF REVIEWING AGENCIES, THE PLr1NNING DIVISION'S STAFF REPORT AND RECOMIVIENDATIONS FOR THE APPLICATION DESCRIBED IN FURTHER DETAIL IN THE STAFF REPORT. THE PLANNING CONIMISSION HELD A PUBLIC HEA.RING TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY ON December 3, 2012 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING A RECONIMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ON THE REQUEST. THE CITY COUNCIL AISO HELD PUBLIC HEr'�RINGS TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY ON December 11,2012 PRIOR TO M�KING A DECISION ON THE REQUEST. THIS DECISION HAS BEEN BASED ON THE FACTS, FINDINGS�1ND CONCLUSIONS CONTt1INED��'ITHIN THIS FINr1L ORDER. Subject: ➢ To amend the current Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map to include map designarions for the River Terrace Commimity Plan area based on recommended land uses found in Washington County's West Bull Mt. Concept Plan; to amend the current Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goal 14: Urbanization goals,policies, and recommended action measures.The complete text of the Amendment can be viewed on the City's website at http://www.rigard- or.gov/code_amendments. AT THE 12/11/12 CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING,THE COUNCIL UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THIS REQUEST (Ordinance No. 12-12). ZONES: N/A APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380 and 18390;Comprehensive Plan Goals 1,2, 5, 6,7, 8,9, 10, 11, 12, 13,and 14;Metro Urban Growth Functional Plan Tide 11;and Statewide Planning Goals 1,2,5,6,7,8,9, 10, 11, 12, 13,and 14. Action: D � Approval as Requested ❑ Approval with l,mendments ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the ne�vspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: � Affected Uovernment Agencies � Interested Parties Final Decision: THIS IS THE FINAL DECISION BY THE CIT'Y AND IS EFFECTIVE ON January 10,�?p�'.2o(� The adopted fmdings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the City� of Tigard Planning Division,Tigard Ciry Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, Oregon. Appeal: A review of this decision may be obtained by filing a notice of intent with the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) within 21 days according to their procedures. Questions: Call the City of Tigard Planning Division or the City Recorder at (503) 639-4171. CI'17' O1' "17G.1R1�, ORl�.(�ON '1'IG:11ZD C1'I'�' C()UNCII. OKDIN,INC1�, NO. 12- f�- ;1N ORI�IN.�NCI: .�I�OP'1'tNG CO;�il'RI:HI:NtiI�'1? PI..1N .1�111:ND;�f1�.1�''1' (:P.� 2O12-(1O(x)2 '1'O .111�f1;ND 'I'HI? 'I'I(�;1RD COniPR1:HI:N�I�'I; I'l„�N ni.1l' '1'O INCI,lI1�I; I.;1ND USI�. DI:SIGN.�'1'IONS l�<)R '1'HI; RI\'I;R '1'1�KR1CI: COAI�IUN1"17' PL:1ri :1R1:_1 l�.�til:l� ON Rl?(;O1�f1�1I:ND�:D 1..1ND USI;S l�OUND IN \X�:1�HING'1'ON COUN'1'�"S V�'I:S'1' BUI.I, �fl'. CONCI?I'"1' PI..�N �WD _1;1II;ND '1'Hl: (;l?R1tI�.N'I' 'I'IG.�RI� (:C);�fl'R}:HI;NtiI\'1; PI..�N GO:1I. ]4: LI1tI3:-�NI'/.:1'I'I()N P()],I(:I�;S. \X/HI=;RI:,,S, Washin�tc�n Counr}� Board of(;ommissioncrs adoJ�ted b}' Resolution and ()rder the V(/est Bull ;�it. Conccpt Plan;and \X'1-�I:RI::15, the cit�� c�f'1'i�ard si��cd an intcr�;o�•ernmental agrecment��id� ��G'ashin�,nc>n C��unh� tc� rcfine thc ccmcept Plan intc� rhe Ri�•er'I'errace Cc�mmu�iiri• Plaii; and �K'H1:RI:_1S, thc Ki�•er'1'erracc Cc�mmunin• Plan �rill put intc� Place a mcans �o implcmcnt thc ��ision of thc cc�nccPt Plan throu�h zc�nin�;, dc�•�lnpmcnt codc rcgulations and c�ther mcasures that �vill makc urban dc��cloPmcnt J�c�ssible; and �X'1�I:R1�,.15, thc cin• c�f'1'i�;ard ��•as a��•ardcd},�rant mcmies as Part of thc inter�c��•crnmcntal a�,�rccmcnt and thc Pr<�posed amendment ��-i11 allc��-access tc� fime3s; aiid \k'H�:R1:.1S, the cih• has ProJ�c�sed an amcndm�nt te� the '1'i�,rard (:c�m�rehensi�•e Plan ;�IaP to include land use dcsi�;naac>ns fc�r the IZi�•er "1'errace Communih� Plan area bascd Oil recc�mmended land uses in the ecmcept Plan; and VUH1'.Rl?:1ti, nc� cin• has proposcd an amcndmcnt tc� thc '1'igard (:omPrchensi�-c Plan bt� uPdarin}; P��licics cc�rrespc�ndin�;to Statc�vidc Plannin};<�c>al 1�; and ��i'HI+.RI?.15, thc '1'i�rd Plannin� (;c�mmissicm hcld a Public hcarin�;, ��•hich was nc�ticcc� in accordancc �titith cih� standards, c�n Dcccmbcr 3, 2(11?, and recommendcd apJ�rcn•al c�f thc Prc��c�src3 CP.\ ?U12-U(N1t12 b�• mc�tion and with ��r�� Urr��rt;and �!UHI?R1;:15, c�n I�cccmbcr 11, 211]?, thc '1'i�,�rd (;in• Cc�uncil hcld a Public hcarin�;, �vhich �vas nc�ticed in acec�rdance ��•ith cih• standards, tc� ccrosider the (;c�mmissie�n's reeommendatic�n c�n (;P.1 ?(Il?-(1(11)112, hear public tcstimcm��, and appl�� applicablc dccisicm-makin�;critcria; ancl ��HI:R1�..15, c�n I�ecember I 1,2O12, rhe '1'i�;ard Cin• Cc�uncil ade�Pted CP_1 2f)12-OUI)l)2 pursuant tc� thc public hcarin�; and its dclibcrations; and Certified to be a true copy�oE the original document ou file a ity of Tigard City Hall. � � By: -E- Lc,-i- .�C'l.i CL��L� e ORDINANCE No. 12- � �� Ciry Recorder, i[y f'1'igaru Pabe 1 Date: l� ' �a �-� � `� r f W'HI�RI��\S, Council's dccision to adopt CP.1 21112-(1()�()2 ��as based on thc findings and cc>nclusions found in I�.shibit "C" and die associated land usc record which is incorporated herein br refcrcnce and is containcd in land use filc CP�1 2i112-O0O02. NO�',THF:Rf:FnRI;,'1'HI:C�`IY<�I�17G.1� ORD.IINS.�S 1�OI,l,OWS: SI�.C170N 1: Tigard Cit�� Council amends thc "1'igard Compmhensi��e Plan A1a� to include land use desi�,mations for the Ri�•er Terrace Community Plan area as sliown in I;xhibit".��". SI;(:'I`ION 2: Tigard (:ih- Council amends '1'igard Comprehensi�•e Plan to include new te�t as shown in I:xhibit "B". SI;CI'ION 3: 'I'igard Cit}� Council adopts the findin�;s and conclusions contained in Exhibit "C" in support of dle Council's acd�n and to be the le�islaa��e basis for this ordinance. SI:(°I"ION 4: 'I'his ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage b}' the Council, signature bt� the n1a}�or, and postin�b�• the Cit}�Recorder. P.�titiI:D: B}� �� ll��us �-ote of all Council m mbers present after being read b}� number and title onl�', d�is 1�da��<�f ��r�r.�� ,2()12- � 2r �(,'�� , Catherinc�X�headeti�,Cih-RcEor er Jl� � --� :�PPR(��I:D: B}•'I'igard Cin�Cc>uncil diis /(�da}'of �.�C�m�"'� ,2(112. 1 ` °-�—� ��_n:..t...�.� �r,,.,,,.- G r�� c��,�►, BuL.� nQ_r , �c��n�. `L �e� �.dQ�� .1ppro�•ed as to form: 1 l �� _ , _�.•n.�� . ,in� .lttorne�� ORDINANCE No. 12- /� Page 2 1 �► ��rs.��.os:��-�.-ra%�i��■��i.-i� � � • � . � � . • t � � :t�A� • I I I I I I � ._.� _ _ ' � i�i�' ��iniir� ��" ;•� ;,,;,e% ►�'-1!�� :: ��■ ■ � �;r;. .•�• �� :: � �� \�'�!T! ��1 � \— ^ 111t1 �' �, �r �� : "`` . vl�.■ ,� – , i � � . ►� �Z a %��/ ��\�� 1� 1 1 IIINII �■I�j��s1=H��D�� _�� ► \ - , � �r��.'d 111p ' t11 � �� L�'_ � Lr=�� Illlj 1 /� 1111�� Z �' 1 1� INIIIII C:111111,C� 1 1�!a� � �� •• 1 � � ��►�� ii rir'u�n� mu� �_��n-_�= - =��'.'lll�lt ' �il �� u��m_.m. .-.•.__ � � 1111 11 1 , � �1�� II�iIj j111 I�1�11111_; ' • • • - � � - • . • � �� 1j�� 111 11111111�: � , I � 1�1 1111�,.. ► y�� ! r . • . • • • ' ��r��" � ��=�ml-. II ��i� �� _ ... ►.-- ��i�u��L�iiui� . .- u I�� ►��Ii1 111►� • � 1� � �� s 1 11�1 1l111 i ■/�/ ��11111111��/!1 1�1111; -• �- GC � ;fnr �� 1��qls - nm 1111: _� - ��■� .��inr�� I�ll�rll`T . .- ;� u��n umm�n� �unn nnr�� F :�nn := �w u � � t � :� �� /� ��1111111 11111��1�! - . .• ••• . ■,. •IIN� :� �/� � � '� �, 0�'==nuo,��-m - ►i •� �` •:'�_ �i ��.� �.- .. - � :_:�_ ;;... �_-- . � . ..�_ i.-unlWiu n�? -.� � - . . �:� i�::�� . _ � � �� d/�',�� I�� oI , ■�., ��i � � � �� .. . :. ._ •`�i � � r+ _� ■��►�1� : I �`� _��i%i ,. . :. . . ;M i �� . :. .. � i I ��`� �� n .� � ..- � , � ��/ � � �: �iiini=iiii =�� 6 .�u��m�n i�� 1 11 � Ir 11 UIIIH�1111�■ ■■ ;, - �IN�t 1 1111=11111111 :� .�I�� • �I 11��••��• 1„ �.��■��■� � �11�%� i � ��` ��; •:��'� qi'��i�`�•',/�� /� ��1� �� Ill��u�u%�' ��1`�� ::�� . �� • ��(�� ';` 1�� i 1. Q ��a�� /1��j �f1 ,1■�� _ ��I,1�� / 11 ��■�■■� L��aii/I��/�� %�ri�.�� ` � � u� = 1, _� �� ' � a�-�==� '%a� � � � ,� �� %/ , / �� _ = ' --��.. �� n � ' : �. . - -= _ == :�_. �� ►\\��H // _ � ' Q, 'i ►��=�ii��ii J�. i�� :Ii � I��r► ��=1��:,•� �r�� i � � .: _ � �mn►�\� ■ �� 1111111!=Z�� 111 1=��■ ��.�� I-'�ii �i �Um ��■� � =1111=� � I�m�n u1� . �`-1��C��c .L-��-, �� --� � ��h►�'�-,.�,� S— i�� l� v �� Cih� of'1 igard �� 'b' � � � CP,12O12-00�02 C�r� 1 � - 1 � , � 1'roposed 'I'igard Cc>mj�rehensi��e Plan Te�t Changes The City of Tigard pmposcs to amend the Goal l�}: L'rbanization chapter of its comprehensi�-e plan to include the policies below. '1'he policies �vill be located under exisdng'1'i�;ard Comprehensi��e Plan Goal 14.3. The policies are inrended ro pro�-ide guidance during the pre�aradon and after adopaon of the Ri�•er"I'errace Communih- Plan. 5. A4etro brought areas kno�vn as .1rca G3, .�rea G4 and Ro�� Rogers�\'est :�rea within the Urban Gro�vth Boundan�. "1'hesc areas are kno�vn as the Ri�•er Terrace Communih�Plantung area. '1'he Cin� of Ti�ard shall be the designated sen•icc provider for thc area. G. The Cin� shall pre�are and adopt a Ri�•er'1'crrace Communih• Plan for the area. 11ie basis for the Riner 1�crrace C��mmunih� Plan shall be the land use designadons frc�m thr��'est 13ull ;1lountain Concept Plan. Kefinements tc> the\�'est I�ull ;�lountain Concept Plan chall be considered during dir }�ublic plannin�prc>cess for the Ri��er Terrace Corru�wnit}-Plan. 7.The Cit�• sh�ll identif�• a��rorriate urban zoning districts and regulations as part of the Ri�•cr 'I'errace Communit�� Plan,�vhich shall compl�� vith the State«�ide Plannin�Goals and the l�ietrc� l'rban Growth ;�lanagement Functional Plan. 8.'I'he Cin� shall defer land u�e and zonin�decisions�vithin the arca to��'ashington Count�•,as outlined in the Inter�o�-ernmental .lgreement dated :1j�ril 2�,2012, until the Ri�•cr"I'erracc Communiri� Plan is adc�pted. 9. If all areas are not anne�ed b}• the Cin� b�� thc time the Ri�•er 1'errace C<�mmunih� Plan is adc�pted, the Cin� shall seek an amendmcnt to rhe Inter�o�•ernmental Agreemer�t of.�pril 2�, 2012 transferring land usc and zoning r�sponsibilin� for the Ri�•cr"I'errace Cotnmu�vri• Planning arca, includin� uninc��rporated areas, to the Cin•. l(l. Once the Ri�-er"1'errace Communi[�• I'lan is adopted,and upon annexauon tc� the Ciri', urban zonin�districts shall be adorted for these areas. 1 f unincorporated arcas remlin, rural z�run� shall bc retained for these arcas. 1]. "1'he Cin• shall prepare a public facilitie� plan and an infrastructure financing rlan a� rart of the Ri�-cr'I�crracc Communin� Plan. 12. No application �f Cih• zoning or de�relopment shall be appro�-ed U�� the cih��vithin thc Ri��er Terrace Communih� Plan Area until such rime as a full anal}'sis under the 'I'ransportauon Planning Rule ('I'PR) (O��K 660-012-0060),wluch shall includc a transportarion fwiding strate�� prepared in coordination�vith��'ashington Counn�,has been completed and approved for the 12i�•er'I'errace Communih�Plan .�rea bt� the Cih�. 'I7�e funding strate�� should idendfi• transportation improvements�roposed to resoh-e transportarion ��stem impacts generated b�� de��elopment of the Ri�-er'I'errace Community Area, the responsible part}' for constructing improvements, their associated cost esumates and public and/or private funding sources,including sources that ma}' be specified b}' any applicable memoranda of understanding or de��elopment a�reement. If the funding strategy includcs transportarion Supplemental Det�elopment Char�es,it should idenufj> the process and tinvng for their ahpro�-al and implementation. `-'`-�� ', ��Cc L � t�-r-r, � �—� t�rY � �1`�,p ti'l f C1� �a / �i /ao�a �h � b �� r� 1�� la Agenda Item: Hearing Date: December 3.2012 Time: 7:00 PM STAFF REPORT TO THE . PLANNING C�MMISSION s FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON . . � 120 DAYS = N/A SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: ADOPT WEST BULL MT.CONCEPT PLAN RECOMMENDED LAND USES AND ASSOCIATED POLICIES FILE NO.: Comprehensive Plan Amendment(CPA)CPA2012-00002 PROPOSAL: "1'o amend the current "1'igard Comprehensive Plan Map to include map designations for the River Terrace Community Plan area based on recommended land uses found in �'ashington Count}'s \�G'est Bull Mt. Concept Plan; to amend the currcnt Tigard Comprehensi�Te Plan Goal 1-�: L'rbanization goals,policies, and recommended action measures. APPLICANT: (:it}�of Tigard OWNER: N/:� 131?S SV�'f�all IIoule�-ard "I'igard,OR 97223 LOCATION: Ri�rer Terrace Communin�Plan :�rea APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Communitv Decelopment Code Chapters 18.380 and 18.390; Comprehensive Plan Goals 1, 2, 5, G, 7, 8, 9, l0, ]1 ,12, 13, and 14; :�Tetro Funcrional Plan Tide 11; and Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13,and 1�. SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Comtnission finds this request to meet the necessary approval criteria and RECOMI�4ENDS the Ti�ard City Council amends the Tigard Comprehensive Plan text and map as determined through the public hearing process. ti r:�i�i�iti�.��c�it i"i'c�'i'i ii�.i�i..�;:�:i�c;c x�auussu�� c:i>:�2ot?-axx,z ��.�c;i•: i c�i� i� SECTION III. B1�CKGROUND INI�ORI��-�TION Project History The cih� has agreed ��ia an intergo�-ernmental agreement (IGA) with \�'ashington Countt• ro refine its \�'est 13ull A1t. Concept Plan into the River Terrace Communit�� Plan. `I'he communit�� plan will put into place a means to implement the vision of the concept plan through zoning, de��elopment codc regulations and other measures that will make urban c�e�-elopment possible. The process ��ill also include updates to utilin�, parks and transportarion master plans, including the financial strategies necessarv to fund and maintain reyuired infrastructure impro��ements. The concept plan was created ot�er the course of three }'ears with the help of a stakeholder working group (S\�'G) and a technical ad��isor}� committee ('1'.�C). Project goals and principles guided the de�-elopment of tltc land use, transportauon and parks frame�vork maps. '1'hese maj�s represcntcd the �-ision stakeholders agreed upon for the future development of the area. The�� proride a variet�� of residential densiries and housing n�pes; disperse densities throughout the communin-; pro��ide appropriate amounts of commercial uses, parks, trails and open space; and outline a multi-modal network of connected streets and �valkable blocks. "I'he S��'G and TAC both vored to fonuard the concept plan to the \�'ashin�ton Count�� Planning Commission and Board of Commissioners for consideration and adoption. In No�-ember 2010, the Planning Commission ��oted to recommend the I3oard adopt the concept plan. In Decen�Uer 2O10, the Board adopted thc concept plan bti� Resolution and Order. Since the conclusion ��f tl�e concept plan, the cit}' has anne�ed a porrion of the area (.�rea G4) and peritions ha�-e been filed b�� propert�� o��ners to annex the remainder of the area ��rithin the urban gro�vth Uoundar}' (11reas 63 and Rov Rogers \\'est). The cin• will cotnplete the Ri1-er 7'errace Communih� Plan for all of thcse areas. Cin� staff has de��eloped a �vork rrogram to guide the project through completion. 'I'his �vill include a lot of technica] �vork to ensure the commuruh- plan meets the state and regional planning requirements, as �vell as a public in�-oh•ement plan to engage stakeholders in an}' necessan� refinements to the concept plan as the proccss mo�-es for�vard. Staff anricipates completion of the River Terrace Communiri� Plan in summer 2014. The first recommendation is to adopt the concept plan recommended land uses (Exhibit �1) into the "I�igard Comprchensi��e Plan. "1'his action �vill set capectarions for the communin� planning �rocess, as �vell as allo�vin� the ciri� to access a porrion of the C1;7' funds from ;��etro that �vere given to the cin� through the IG:1 �vith \�'ashington Counn�. .� number of policies �vill also be recommended for ldopdon to guide regulauon of the River "I'errace area during and after completion of the coininunin- planning process (E�:hibit :�). 'f hese recommended land uses will be further analyzed as part of the communit�� plan�ung process and if there are needed retinements, recommendarions�vill be brought back to planning commission and cin�co�ncil for adoption at the end of the process. Ptoposal Description The priman� intent of the amendment is t� ensure the Cit��'s Comprehensi��e Plan remains a �•iable tool fc�r decision-makers. B}� adopan� the amendment, the Cit�- �vill set ex�ectations for the Ri�-er "1'erracc Communih� Plan process and start the transformation from vision to zoiung and regulations for the area. til'.U�I�KItPC>Itl i't�'i'I II;I'I..\'�'�IN(�c:c)�1\iltitilO?� (:l'.1?012—OiNN)3 V.\(�I{2(11� 17 SECTION IV. SUMMARY OF REPORT .-1pf�licuhle�rrteria, Comi»i.,.rron fznrlin�.c und ron�l�r.rio��.r • Tigard Communin' Development Code o Chapter 18.380 o Chapter 18.390 • r�pplicable Camprehensi��e Plan Policies o Chapter 1: Cidzen Ineolvement o Chapter 2: I.and Use Planning o Chaptcr 5: Natural Resources and F-�istoric Areas o Chapter 6: I:m�ironmental Quality o Chapter 7: I iazards o Chapter 8: I'arks, Recreadon,Trails,and Open Space o Chapter 9: Ecc�nomic Development o Chapter 1�: Housing o Chapter 11: Public Faciliues and Sen�ices o Chapter 12:1'ransportauon o Chapter 13: Energ}'Consen�ation o Chapter 14: L'rbanization • Tletro Urban Gro�uth 111anagement I;uncrional Plan Title l l • State�vide Planning Goals o Goals 1,2,5,G,7,8,9, 10, 11, 12, 13,and 1�. G��j�lle�a�/ment an�!or�tri�le uge�n��•om�nent.r SECTION V. APPLICABLE CRITERIA AND COMMISSION FINDINGS CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (TITLE 18� Chapter 18.380: Zoning Man and Text Amendments Chapter 18.380.020 Legislat�ve Amendments to the Title and Map A. Legislative amendments. Legislative zoning map and text amendments shall be undertaken by means of a Type IV procedure, as governed by Section 18.309.060G Findin�s: "1'he amendment to thc "1'igard Comprehensi��e 1'lan establishes j�olicies to Uc applicd generall}' throughc�ut the Ri��er Tcrrace Communin� Plan ��rea; 1nd therefore, the application is being processed as a 'I��•pe I�' procedure, Legislati��e .-�mendment, as governed by Seccion 18.390.OGOG. Cha�ter 18.390: Decision-Making Procedures Chapter 18.390.020. Description of Decision-Making Procedures B.4. Type IV Procedure. Type IV procedures apply to legislative matters. Legislative matters involve the creation, revision, or large-scale implementation of public policy. Type IV matters are considered initially by the Planning Commission with final decisions made by the City Council. Findin�s: The amendment to the "1'igard Comprchensi�Te Plan establishcs policies to be applied generall�� throughout the Ciri� of'Tigard. Therefore �vas re��ie�ved under the 7'��pe I�' procedurc as detailed�in Section 18.390.(1GO.G. In accordance ��rith this section, the amendment �vas itutiall�� considered b�� the Planning Commission�vith Cin' Council making the tinal decision. � Chapter 18.390.060.G. Decision-making considerations. The recommendation by the Commission and the decision by the Council shall be based on consideration of the S"I.U�I�RI{l'()R"I 1'(�7'i II�:I'I..\'�'�I\(�(:(111\Iltitil()ti (:Y\2iJl?-0(NNl? P.\(�I(3l)I� 17 following factors: 1. The Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines adopted under Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter197; 2. Any federal or state statutes or regulations found applicable; 3. Any applicable Metro regulations; 4. Any applicable comprehensive plan policies; and 5. Any applicable provisions of the City's implementing ordinances. Findin�s�. "I'he Commission re��iewed applicable State�vide Planning Goals, rletro L'rban Gro�vth Manageinent Functional Plan, thc "1'igard Commuruh� Dei�elopment Code, and the 7'i�ard Comprehensive Plan. As indicated pursuant to the Commission's tindings and conclusions found within this staff report the amendmcnt is consistent�vith this criterion. CONCLUSION: Based on the anal��sis abo�•e, the Cominission finds that the proposcd amendment satisfies the apPlicable re�rie�v criteria uridun the Tigard Communin' De�-elopment Code. CITY OF TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES: General FindinQs Findin�: The Cit��'s Comprehensi��c Plan was adoJ�tcd by thc Tigard Cih� �:ouncil in 1983, and ackno�vledged as being in conformanee �vith the State�vidc Planning Goals U�� the Land Conser��ati��n and De�•elopment Department (LCDC) on October l], 1)8-�. ],(:DC rc- ackno«�ledged the plan's compliancc w-ith the state��nde planning goals throu�;h the Periodic Re�•iew process. Findin�: "1'he Commission finds that the follo�ving Comprehensi�re Plan goals and policies appl�� to the amendment and the amendment sausties che applicable goals and policies for the reaso»s stated belo�ti>. During the course of public hearings, the Communin� De�-elopment Department and the Planning Cominission pro��idcd all interested parties opportunities to identifi•,either �rall�• or in writing, an�• other Comprehensi�•e Plan goals or policies that might app1�- to thc amcndmcnt. No addiuonal pro��isions�vere identitied. Cha,��ter 1: Citizen Involvement Goal 1.1 Ptovide citizens, affected agencies, and other jutisdictions the opportunity to participate in all phases of the planning process. Policy 2. The City shall define and publicize an appropriate role for citizens in each phase of the land use planning process. I�in_ di�Tes: �'he proposal has COI11�I1CCj �vith all n��rificauon rcyuirements pursuant to (.:harter ]8.;i90.060 of thr 'I�i�;ard (:ommunin� lle��clopment Code. This staff re�ort �vas also a��ailable se�-en da��s in ad�-ancc c�f the hearin� �ursuant to Chapter 18.39U.070.L.b of thc '1'igard Comcnunih� lle�-elopment Cc>de. ti'I'.\I�I�KI�.Pc�K I I c�"1'I II•:I'I..\\�l\c;�:c��1\IlStilc�ti l.l'.1 2f)I?_�KMNI? V.\(;1�.4OI�I/ .-1s Part <�f the Comprehcnsi��c Plan .�mendment process, public notice of the Planning Commission and Cit}' Council public hearin� was sent to the interested part}• list, Ri��er Terrace properti� o�vners and propern� owners within 500 ft. of River 'I'errace and published in the No��ember 15, 2012 issue of The 'I'imes. T'he notice imTited public input and included the phonc number of a contact person to ans�ver questions. The nouce also included the address of the Ciri�'s webpage�vhere the entire draft of the proposed amendment could be ��iewed. Policy 3. The City shall establish special citizen advisory boards and committees to provide input to the Ciry Council, Planning Cornmission, and City staff. Find��ines�. The �Y'est Bull A4t. Concept Planning recommendations �vere cndorsed b�� both the projecr's steering committee and technical ad��isory commitree. 1'hese groups included communit�� stakeholders,properh• o�vners and jurisdictional partners. Poticy 5. The opportunities for citizen involvement ptovided by the City shall be appropriate to the scale of the planning effort and shall involve a broad cross-section of the community. Findines: :�s outlined abo�•e, the communin� was gi��en nouce and opportunih' to gct informaUOn and get tesdit•. Goal 1.2 Ensure all citizens have access to: A. opportunities to communicate directly to the City; and B. information on issues in an understandable form. Policy 1. The City shall ensure pertinent information is readily accessible to the community and presented in such a manner that even technical information is easy to understand. I�ind�^n�s: Informadon re�,'arciing the ropics included in this Comprehensi��e Plan rlmendment ��as a��ailabl� i�l multiPle locauons in an understandable format for the durarion of the process. '1'his included paper and electronic rnpies that �vere a�•ailable in the permit center and also on the �vebsite. Policy 2.The City shall utilize such communication methods as mailings, posters, newsletters, the internet, and any other available media to promote citizen involvement and continue to evaluate the effectiveness of inethods used. I�indines: Infonnauon �;�as di�tributed throughout the process ria the Cin�'s �uebsite and direct mlilings to properh� o�vners in thc lti�•er"I'erracc area and all proJ�ert}• owners uritl-un 500 ft. of thc area. Policy 5.The City shall seek citizen patticipation and input through collaboration with community organizations, interest groups, and individuals in addition to City sponsored boatds and committees. Findi�nQ,s: The \\'est Rull l�It. Conce�t Planning recommendarions �vere endorsed b�� both the pr�iect's steering co�nmittee and technical ad�icor�• comrriittec. "I'hese groups included community stakeholders,prc�pern' c��vners and jurisdicuoiial parmers. �1'\I�I�RI;Yt�It f 1�(� I'I it�:I'I..\\I�Iti(�c:c»I�Iltitilc�� :l'.1?UL'-�IU�Ni2 I'\<:I:�c 11� 17 Cha�ter 2: Land Use Plannin.� Goa12.1 Maintain an up-to-date Comprehensive Plan, implementing regulations and action plans as the legislative basis of Tigatd's land use planning progtam. Policy 1:The City's land use program shall establish a clear policy direction, comply with state and regional requirements, and serve its citizens' own interests. Findings: The ainendment refines the general polic}' direction related to'I'igard Comprehe�isi�-e Plan Goal 14: t`rbanization for compleuon of the communih� plan and subsequent de�•elopment of the Ri�=er Tcrrace Area. 1'he polic�� statements arc clear and sen�e the interests of the citize.ns. "l�he cit�� coordinated the de�•elopment of the proj�oscd policcs ��th the Oregon Dcpartmcnt of Transportation, thc Department of I.and C:onsen•ation and lle�-elopment,and A4etro to cnsure comrliance u>ith statc and re�ional rcquirements. Policy 2:The City's land use tegulations, related plans, and implemenring actions shall be consistent with and implement its Comptehensive Plan. Findin�s: The amendmcnt refines the general polic�� direction related to Tigard Comprnc�nsi��c Plan Goal l4: l'rbanizauon for completion of the communih' plan and subseyuent de�•elopment of the Ri��er Terrace .'�rea. It alsc>aj�plies comprehensi��e plan dcsignadc�ns tc� the Ri�-er'1'errace :�rea that arc based on the\\'cst Bull i11t. C�ncept Plan rcc<�mmcnded land uses. Both�vill bc used to guide the applicauon of 7'i�;ard zonin�;and regulations to the area tllat«-i11 be consistent �vith the comPrehensi�-e plan. Policy 3. The City shall coordinate the adoption, amendment, and implementation of its land use program with other potentially affected jurisdictions and agencies. l�in_ dinrs: 'I�he Cin'sent out request for cc�mments on the prc�posed amendment to all�otentialh' affected jurisdicti��ns and a�c:ncies. .1ll�vere gi�-en 1-1 da��s to respond. .1n�• comments that �vere recei��ed are addressed in Section�'II� Outside_�gene�- Comments of this Staff Rep�rt. .�ddiaonall}•, i�fetro, the C)reg�n l�erartment of'1'ransportation,and the llej�artment of l.and (:onsen•auon and lle��elopment staff provided input throughout th� de�•elopment of ihc proposed amendment. Policy 20. The City shall periodically review and if necessary update its Comprehensive Plan and regulatory maps and implementing measures to ensure they are current and responsive to community needs, provide reliable information, and confotm to applicable state law, administrative rules,and regional requirements. I�indi� 'I'he rror<�scd amendmcnt u.�ill urdatc thc '1'i�;ard Cc>mprehensi�-e Pl1n map and Policie� to prepare for the future de�-elopment of the Ri��er "1'crrace .1rea. 'I'he arel has bccn brou�ht into the urban�;ro��-th boundan• and a cc�ncej�t plan completed. "1'he concept plari ��as a collaboration of man}' stakeholdcrs, re�ulatorr• a�cncics, and lc>cal jurisdictions. "1'he amcndment �vill sct the stage for the transfi�nnation of the c<�ncert plan into a commuturi� plan �vhere thc application of zoning and re�ulaucros �uill takc placc '1'hc communin• plan uill rro�•ide reliablc informatic>n to mlkc ti�idin};s again.t applicablc la��•s and reyuiremcnts. I�indings of conf�nnancc to a��licable �tate a�Id regional reyuirements Eor this amcndment can be tound iti ti�ction \' �>f ihis Staff Rcj�c�rt. til'\I�I�RI.I'l1R'I' It� I'lil:l'I.\\'�1�c��:��11\Iltitilll\ (.P\3111?-lNNK12 I'\(�I(G(11• 17 Chapter 5:Natural Resources and Historic Ateas Goa15.1 Protect natural resources and the environmental and ecological functions they provide and, to the extent feasible, restore natural resources to create naturally functioning systems and high levels of biodiversity. Fin in s: :�s discussed in the findings made for State�vide Pl�nning Goal 5, the amendment does not alter the City's acknowledged Goal 5 inventories or land use programs. No changes will occur to currcnt Natural Resource rrotections as the result of adopung the proposed amendm�nt. 'l�he amendment does not conflict urith �oals and policies of this chapter of the '1'igard Comprehensi�•e Plan. Cha�ter 6: Environmental Quality Goa16.1 Reduce air pollution and improve air qualiry in the community and region. Policy 3: The City shall promote land use patterns, which reduce dependency on the automobile, are compatible with existing neighborhoods, and increase opportunities for walking,biking, and /or public transit. Findingc: The proposcd amendmcnt designatec comprehensi�'e plan land uses baced on thc rccommended land uscs found in the concept plan. 7'he concept plan �vas completed using a principlc ��f transportauon choices and a>nnecti�-iri�. Tlie concept plan �ro�-ided ti�r a broad range of cont�ected infrastn�ctum that allo��•ed com•cnicnt access for pedestrians, c��clists, dri�•er�, and transit riders. It also recommended a neighborhood commercial area that is accessiblc b�• bike or foot from the neighborhoc�ds adjacent to and �vithin the Planning area. Gi�-ing reside»ts a �•arien• of choices ��ill promote the teducuc�n of ��ehicle miles tra�•eled. No transrortatic�n amendments are ProPoscd at this time, but will be addressed during the c<nnmunin> planning process. Chapter 7: Hazards Goa17.2 Protect people and property Gom flood, landslide, earthquake,wildfire, and severe weather hazards. Fin_di�s_'1'he aduption of the pre�rosed amendment has no impact on Cih� policics or �rc>�rams related to hazards. "I'he communih� plan �vill addre�s hazards through the ap�licatic�n c�f zonin�; and codc re�ulations. Chapter 8: Parks, Recreation.Trails, and Open Space Goal 8.1 Provide a wide variety of high quality park and open spaces for all residents, including both: a. developed areas with facilities for active recreation; and b. undeveloped areas for nature-oriented recreation and the protection and enhancement of valuable natural resources within the parks and open space system. s� �i�i�lti.1�� it i r�� n n i>i.��i�c;�:c��t�iis�ic�� (.P\ 3U13-IMMMI? I'.\(iI."l)I'1 i Goal 8.2 Create a citywide network of interconnected on- and off-road pedestrian and bicycle trails. I�indi�_The adopuon of thc proposed amendment has no im�act �n C;in• policies or pr�grams related to parks, recreation, trails, and c�pen space. The comprehensi�•e plan map will ha�-e open space designations added �vith the amendment, but the cih� has no zonin}; t�� identif�� prc�J�erdes for these uses. Recommended locations �vill Ue finalized through the communitt• planning process and address needed parks, trails, and c�pen cpace. 1'he Tigard 1'arks System Alaster Plan �vill be updated as part c>f the process and guide furure ci�� facilides. Chapter 9: Economic Development Goal 9.3 Make Tigard a prosperous and desirable place to live and do business. Fin�T "1'he proposed amendment desi�nates fi�-e acres of the Ri�•er "1'errac� arca as neighborhood com�nercial on the 'I'i�;ard Comprehensi�•e Plan map. 'I'he concept plan intended this commercial area to sen•e as a retail, mised-use gathering place for the nei�;hborhoods in close prosimih�. 'I'he o��erall �•ision of thr concept plan is to create ;� net�vork of multi-modal transporta[ion imrro�•ement to proinote �valking and biking through th� neighbonc��ods to access the cc�mmercial area. 'I'he concept plan stakeholder� recommendcd this approach as opp�.ed tc> auto-oricnted commcrcial de�-clopment to inake thc area more desirable and lirable. Chapter 10: Housing Goal 10.1 Provide opportunities for a variety of housing types to meet the diverse housing needs of current and future City residents. I�indi�s: 1'he proposcd amendment dcsignates thc majoriri• of land�vithin the Ri��er'ferracc arca as residenual oti thc '1'igard Cc�mprchensi��e Plan map, di�•ided into low, mediucn, and lligh densin�. The rangc of comprehcnsi�-e plan desi�nauons ��ill allo�� for a �•arieti' of housing h•pcs on differ�nt sized lots to meet the housing ncr�s of future residents in the area. "1'lus di�•ersiri' �vill also allow the cih� to comj�l�� i�ith A1etm 'I'ide 1 l reyuirement of l0 units/net de�-elo�aUlc acre. 'I'igard �onin�; and re�ulations ��ill be applied to the area during the communin' plannin� Pr�cess based on the proposed comrrehen�i�re plan designations. Cha,pter 11: Public Facilities and Services Goal 11.1 Develop and maintain a stormwater system that protccts development,watet resources, and wildlife habitat. l�ind_ in� The adoption of the prc�posed amendment has no impact on Cin� policies or j�ro�rams relatcd to storm��arer. Ho�ve��er, the concc:pt plan proces, outlined the nece�san' infrastructure needed tc� accotnmodate thc recommended land uses. 'I'he communih• Plan �vill anal�•zc the findings c>f rhe c<,ncepc plan and updace ctorn��vater needs and cost csnmatrs as necessar�•. 'I'he '1'iKard Public I�acilin� Plan�vill then be updated accc>rdin�lt. �1 V�I�IiI P��R I I c�"1'I II�:I'I..\��I�t��:c i�l�ll��ic�� (.I�\�tlj?_INN.NI? I�.\(ili KO�� I i Goal 11.2 Secure a reliable, high quality,water supply to meet the existing and future needs of the community. Findines: '1'he adoption of the proposed amendment has no impact on Cih' policies or programs related to its water distribuuon. Howe�-er, the concept plan process outlined the neccssar�' infrastructure needed to accommodate the recommended land uses. '1'he 'I'igard ��'ater Alaster Plan also accounted for the recommendcd land uses in the Rivcr Terrace area when calculatin� future need. "1'he communin� �lan �vill analvze the findings of che concept plan and update �vater infrastructure need� and cost estimates as necessan�. 'I'he 1'i�ard Public I�acilih� Plan ��rill thcn be uPdated accordingl}�. Goa111.3 Develop and maintain a wastewater collection system that meets the existing and future needs of the community. Findin�s: 1'hc adoprion of thc proposed amcndmcnt has no impact on Ciri� policies or programs related to �vaste��ater collection. I�owe�-er, the concept plan process outlined the necessan• infrastructure needed to accommodate the recommended land uses. Clean \�'ater Sen•ices is currend}' updating its regional collecuon model and these results will be incorporated int� the communiri� planni�ig process. �1'he communiri• plan will anal�•ze the findings of the concept j�lan and update �varer infrastructure needs and cost esrimate� as necessar��. "I'he T'igard Public I�acilih� Plan will thcn bc updatcd accordingh�. Chapter 12: Transportation Goa112.1 Develop mutually supportive land use and transportation plans to enhance the livability of the community. Goal 12.2 Develop and maintain a transportation system for the efficient movement of people and goods. Goal 12.3 Provide and accessible, multi-modal transpottation system that meets the mobility needs of the community. Findings: "I'he pro�osed amendment is c<�nsistent �ti7th these �oals. 'l�e com�rehensi�•e l�nd use designations �vere de��eloped thrc�ugh the concept planning process, �ti�luch took into account the transportation impacts of the recommended land uses. :1lthuugh no transportation impro�•ements are j�roposed to be adc�pted at this time, the commucun� plannin�;process ��•ill anal��ze ai�d refine the transportation pru�osals to suppc>rt thc zoning applied in the Process. "1'hc c�ncept �lan �vas also completed using a rrinciple of transp<�rtation choices and connecti��itt�. '1'he concept plan pro��ided for a broad raiige of connccted infrastructure that allowed con�•enient access fc�r pedestrians, c��clists, drir-ers, ane� tr;�nsit riders. 1'hc c<nnmunin' planiun�; rrocess �vill incorporate findings and infrastructure nceds into the 'I'i�ard 2035 1'ransportation S�•stem Plan and address the State's Transportaaon Plannin� Rule as reyuired. '1'he '1'i�ard Public l�acilin• I'lan �vill then bc updatcd accordinglv. tii u�i�xi:�°c�R� �'ci �'iii i�i..��i�c:� c��1�t�titilc�� (.I'.\?I)1?-(11NN1? I'\(�li 9 l�I 17 Cha�ter 13: Energy Conservation Goa113.1 Reduce energy consumption. Policy 1: The City shall promote the reduction of energy consumption associated with vehicle miles traveled through: A. land use patterns that reduce dependency on the automobile; B. public transit that is reliable, connected, and e�cient; and C. bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure that is safe and well connected. Findi� "I'he proposed amendment designates comprehensi��c plan land uses based on the recommended land uses found in the concept plan. 1'he concePt plan was completed usin� a principle of transportauon choices and connecu��ih°. 'I'he concept plan provided for a broad range of connected infrastructure that allowed con�•eruent access for pedestrians, c}�clists, dri�-ers, and transit riders. It also recommended a neighborhood commercial area that is accessiblc b�� bike or foot from the neighborhoods adjacent to and within the planning area. Cii��ing residents a �-arieh• of choices �vill promote the reducuon of �-ehicle miles tra�eled. No transportation amendments are proposed at this time, but �vill be addressed during the communin• rlanning process. Chauter 14: Urbanization Goa114.1 Provide and/or coordinate the full range of urban level services to lands and citizens within the Tigard City Limits. FindiT 'l�he proposed amendment adopts the recommendcd land uses from the concePt plan into the Tigard Comprehensi��e Plan map. "1'his is the first step of the process to plan for the pro��ision of urba�l le.-el sen•ices to the Ri�-er 'I'errace area, ��•hich u�ill be sen�ed b}' the cin• of Tigard. "I'his amendmcnt does not address the full range of scraices needed for the area, this «rill take place during the commutun' planning prc�cess. 1'he result ��rill be an updated �ublic facilih' plan and an infrastructure tinancing strareg}� for the future de.�elc�pment of the area. Goa114.2 Promote Tigard citizens' interests in urban growth boundary expansion and other regional and state growth management decisions. Findin�s: 'I'he prorc�sed amendmet�t is consistent �LZth this polic�• as rhis is the first stcj� in complevng thc ]Zirer "1'errace Communin' Plan fc�r areas brou�ht �ti�thin the urban gr��wth Uoundar��. 1'he cin•��ill be the sen-ice pro��ider for the area and comPleting the communin' �lan is in Tigard citizens'interest. CONCLUSION: liased on thc anal��sis abo�•c, the Commission tlnds tha[ d�c rrc�posed amendment satistles the applicablc �oals and policies containcd in the Cin• of "1'i�ard Comprehensi�-e Plan. METRO URBAN GROWTH MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONAL PLAN TITLE 11 Findin�s: '!'hc Rcgional l�rameu�c�rk Plan calls for 1<mg-range planning to cnsure that areas brc�u�ht into the t'GB are urbanixed ef6ciend�• and becomc or contribute to inised-use, ��alkable, trarisit friendlt� ec�mmu�uries. ]t is the �ur�ose e�f'1'ide 11 to �uide such 1<�n�;-range j�lannin� fc�r �"1.\I�I�Itl:l'�HZ I fc�l l II:I'I.\�\I\<;<<�11\Iltitilc» c:V\?nt?-rxwNi2 P.�c;l'. tu c il� 17 urban reserves and areas added to thr l'(1B. It is also the purpc�se of'1'ide l l to pro�-ide interim pr�tection for areas added to the L'GB until cih• or counn� amendments to land use regularions to alloiv urbanization become applicable to the areas. 1'he proposed amendment u�ill update the 1'i�;ard Comprehensive Plan map and Policies to prepare for the future development of the Ri��er "I'errace .�rea. '1'he area has been brought into the urban growth boundar5� (.-�reas G3 and G4 in 2002; Ro�� Rogers \�'est in 2011) and a concept plan completed. The concept plan�•as a collaborati�n of man�• stakeholders, regularon� agencies, and local jurisdicrions. The amendment will set the stage for the transfonnarion of the concept plan into a cotnmunin' plan u�here the applicadon of zoning and regulauons �vill take place. "I'he cc�mmuniry plan �cill pro�-ide reliable informadon to make findings against all requirements of 1'ide I1. The concept plan made tindin� against Tide 11 (those in �lace in ?007) and found the �v�rk to be in compliance related to reyuirements for a concept plan. 'I'his included the re9uirement of a�-erage residenual densiries of at least l0 units per net residential acre. "1'he concept plan a��cra�ed 10.7 units per net residential acre in .'�reas 63 and 6�1 (216 acres and 2,311units). 'I'hc 2011 urban gro�vth boundan' e�pansion included in this proposed amendment (Roy Rogers \�'est) is subject to updated '1'ide ll rules. The new rules require a zoned capacin' for a number and t}�pe of housing unit for nc�� arcas added to the t'GB. Ro�� Rogcrs \\'est required zoned capacin• for a ininimum of-179 d�velling units disPersed in the arca or:�djoining:lreas G3 and G�3. 'I'he propc�sed land uses ��-ill achie��e the target through applicauon of�-arious ciri� zorvn� districts that meet the criteria for lo�v and mcdium densih� residential designations (1 to 12 units/acre). "1'he tlesibilin� afforded the ciri' during the cotnmu�iih-j�lanning process��ill ensure compliance��ith Tide 11. 7'he proposed amendment also meets the reyuirements for sufficient commercial sen•ices, inventor�- of and protection plan for natural resources, and a conceptual school plan. Each c�f the three is sho��n �vith a 1'igard Comprehensi��e Plan map desi�nauon. The commercial area �vill pro��ide basic ser�-ices for the area. The open spaces coincidc �vith Clean �\'ater Semices setback requirements and the school district o��ns the proPerty designated as public institution ai�d anricipates tlle de��clopinent c�f a school once enough homes ha�-e been built to support it. The proj�osed amendment also sets polic�� direcuon cc>nsistent ��rich 1'itle ll for interim protecu�n c�f area� added to the L'CTB. '1'he cin� «�ll not allo��• urban le�-e1 de�-elo�ment of the area until the comtnu�un� plan is comPlctc and compliance unth all re�ional 1nd state requirements arc c�nfirmcd. "1'hc proposed amendment is a first ster to set esPectadons for thc community plamun� proccss. The concept plan found compliance ��ith 'I'itle ]1 rcyuirements and the cotnmunih� plan �vill Ue rcquired to dc� the same. '1'he cin�«�orked�vith i�lctro, the C)rcg�n Dcplrtment of'I'ransportation and Oregon Department c�f Land Conser��auon and llerclopment staffs to e�isure their concerns �vere addressed Eor the }�r�pc�sed amendment�. 'I'he�• �verc rro�•ided the O��OYCUilli�• to re�-ic�v and comment�>n all�vork lcading uj� tc> thc documcnt propc>scd for adoPaon. "1'he proposed amendmcnt (CI':'�2013-(10(1(12) adopts the \V'est Bull 111t. Concept Pl1n recomtnendcd land uscs into the 'I'igard Comprehe�isi�-c Plan map and adds j�olicies tc� J�repare for the furure de��elopment of thr Ri�•cr�1'erracc :�r�a. 'I'he area has bcen brou�ht into the urban gro��•th boundan• and a concept plan com�letcd. It��ill set the sta�;e ti�r the transformadon of the cc�nccpt plan into � communin� plan �vhrrc the aj��lication of zoning and regulations �vill takc tiI'.\I�I�ltl•:I'c�K"I "I'c) I'III�1'I.\�\IN(��:��\1�11ti�1c�\ (:1'13u12-iNMNJ2 1'.\(�f: 1I<)I�17 plac�. 'I�he cotnmuiut�� plan �i'il1 pro�ride reliable information to make final findin�;s against applicable la��s and reyuirements. 'I'he proposed amendment is consistent Tide 1 l. CONCLUSION: Based on the anal��sis abovc, the Commission finds that the proposed amendmcnt is consistent�vith thc 1�'Ietro Urban Growth Alanagement Functiona] Plan'1'itle l 1. THE STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS AND GUIDELINES ADOPTED LTNDER OREGON REVISED STATUTES CHAPTER 197 Statew�de Planning Goal l—Citizen Involvement: This goal outlines the citizen involvement requirement for adoption of Comprehensive Plans and changes to the Comprehensive Plan and implementing documents. 1;indines: 'I'his goal was met as the proposal has complied u�ith all notification reyuirements pursuant to Chapter ]8.390.060 of the "Tigard Communit�� De��elopment Code. "I'his staff report was also a�-ailable se��en da}�s in ad��ance of the hearing pursuant to Chapter 18.390.070.I:.b of the Tigard Commu�uh- Development Code. :�s part of the Com�rehensive Plan �mendment process, public notice of the Plannin� Commission and Cih• Cc�uncil public hearings was sent to the ii�terested parues List, pr<�pert�� o�vnerc in the area and �vithin 500 ft. and published in the No�-ember 15, 2012 issue of The T'imes (in acc�rdance ��ith T'igard De�•elopment Code Chapter ]8.390). The nouce im-ited puUlic input and included the rhone number of a contact person to answer yucstions. 7'he nouce also included the address e�f the Cit�'s webpage�vhere the enrire draft of the te�t chan�es could be�-iewed. Statewide Planning GoalZ—Land Use P/anning: This goal outlines the land use planning process and policy framework. The Comprehensive Plan was acknowledged by DLCD as being consistent with the statewide planning goals. Findin� '1'he amcndment to the Tigard Comprehensi�-e Plan is being undertaken to u�date the Cit�'s ackno�vledged Comprehensice Plan in a manner con,istcnt w7th current conditions and ciuzen �•alues. The amendmcnt tc> the '1'igard Com�rehensi�-e Plan is being processed as a '1'��pr I�' procedure, �vhidi requires an}• ap�licable state�vide planning�oals, federal c�r state statute� or re�ulauons, I�lrtro reKulations, cc�mprehensivc plan policies, and Cin's implementin� ordinances, bc addressed as part of the decision-ma{:ing process. All noricing reyuirements ha�-e been met. :�11 applicable re��iew criteria ha�•e bcen addressed ��ithin this staff report; therefore, the requirements of Goal 2 ha1•e Ucen met. Statewide Planntng Goal 5—Natura!Resoutces This goal requires the inventory and protection of natural resources, open spaces, historic areas and sites. Fin�� 1'he Cih� is currentl�� in compliai�ce ��-7th the State's Goal 5 pro�ram and 1�4etro's "I'ide l3: Naturc in Neighborhoods pro�ram, ��hich im�lcments Goal 5. 7'hc amcndment dc�es not alter the Cin's ackn�vwledged Goal 5 im-enrorirs �r land use programs. No chan�es ��till �ccuc t� current natural resource prc�tections. .1s :� r�sult, the amendment to rhe '1'igard Coml�rchcnsi��e Plan is in compliance�>>ith Goal 5 process reyuirements. �7'V�I�IZI:I'c)R'I' fc i'I'I II I'I..\��IN<,i:c�\1�111tiSic�� (;P\2i�12-fHKx�2 I'.\(;1:12c11� 17 Statewide Planning Goal6.•Atr, Water, and Land Resources Quality To maintain and improve the quality of the air,water, and land resources of the state. Fin� '1'he City is currently in compliance �vith l�'ietrds Tide 3: �X'arer Qualin• and Flood blanagement rrogram, which implements Goal 6. The amendment does not alter the City's acknowledged land use programs re�arciing water qualitt� and flood management protecuons. �1s a result, the amendment to the 7'igard Comprehensive 1'lan is in compliance�vith Goal 6. Statewide Planning Goa17—Areas Subject to Natural Hazards To protect people and property from natural hazards. ��n�� g�, The City is currentl�• in compliance �vith Merro's 1'itle 3: �Y'ater �ualiri' and Flood Management pragram, �vhich implements Goal 7. The amendment does not altcr the City's acknowledged land use pro�rams regarding water qualih� and flood management protecuans. 'The Cit�� is currend�� a participant in the National Flood Insurance Program administered by the Federal Emergenc}' I�fanagement Agenc��. Thc amcndment does not alter the Cih•'s parriciparion. .1s a result, the amendment to the Tig�rd Comprehensi�-e Plan is in compliance u•ith Goa17. Statewtde Planning Goal 8—RecreationalNeeds This goal requires the satisfaction of the recreational needs of the citizens of the state and visitors and, where appropriate, to provide for the siting of necessary recreational facilities including destination resorts. I�in�s: 1'he City is currend�� in compliance ��ith State�vide Planning Goal S. 7'he amendment d�es not alrer tltr Ciri•'s acknov�-ledged Goal 8 p�licies or land use rro�;rams. .-1s a result, the amendment to the 1'igard C�mprchensive Plan is in compliance�tirith Goal 8. Statewide PJanning Goa19:Economic Development To provide adequate opportunities throughout the state for a variety of economic activities vital to the health,welfare, and prosperity of Otegon's citizens. Findines: The Cih� is currentl�� in compliance �vith Goal ) and Nletro's Title �: Indu�trial and Other I:mplo��ment .lreas throu�h its acknowledged Comprehen�i�-e Plan. T'he amendment does not alter the Cit}'s ackno�vledged Goal 9 policies or land use programs. ;�s a result, the amendment to the Ti�ard Comprehensive Plan ic in compliance�vith Goal 9. Stateu7de Planning GoaI10:Housrng To provide adequate housing for the needs of the community, region and state. }jindine�: "1'he Cin� is currend}' in cocnpliance with Goal 10 and the Afetropolitan Housing Rule ((),1R 6G0-OO7/Di�ision 7), and I�Ietro's Tide 1: I Iousing Capaciti�, and "Title 7: liousing Choice. 'I'he Cit�� is currenth� under periodic re��iew and performing a Goal l0 anal��sis,which includes the Ri�-er 1'errace area. '1'hc ado�tion of the amendment does not alter thc Citt•'s compliance v�rith C�oal 10 as the addition of the rec<�mmended land uses in the Ri�•er '1'errace area is consictent ��rith state and regional housing reyuircments. The amendmetit to the Comprehetisi��c Plan is in compliance�vith Goal 1O. Statewide P/anning Goa/11:Public Facilittes and Se�ices To plan and develop a timely, orderly and efficient arrangement of public facilities and services to serve as a framework for urban and tural development. ti'1'\I�I�ltl�.l'c�it'I' I'(� fl II;1'1..1f��1`c��:t»I�1ltitiic»; (.I'\?nl?-(NNY12 I'.\(�I.1 i()I�17 Fin in s: '1'he Cit�� ic currend�� in c�mpliance with Goal 11 through its ackno�vledged Comprehensi��e Plan. '1'his includes an adopted Public Facilih� I'lan as required b�� (hegon Ret�ised Statute 197.71? and Oregon Administrati��e Rule G60-011. Z'he amendment does not alter the City's acknowledged Gc�al 1 1 policies or plans. I�o�ve�rer, as part of the Ri�>er Terrace Communitv Plan process, the Public Facilit}� I'lan �ti�i11 be updated to account for the recommended land uses and future de�-elopment of the area, including a financing strate�;y. .�s a result, the amendment to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan is in compliance�vith Goal 11. Statewide Planning Goa112: Transportation To provide and encourage a safe, convenient, and economic transportation system. Findines: The Citv is currentl�� in compliance wlth Goal 12 and Aletro's Regional Transportation Plan through its ackno��•ledged Cotnprehcnsi�-e Plan and 'I'ransportation S}-stem Plan as requircd b}� Uregon .�dministrati��c Rule GGO-Ol2 (Transportauon Planning Rule). The amendment adopts the recomrnended land uses from the ��'est Bull l�it. Concept Plan into the "I'i�ard Comprehensi�-e Plan map. `llie amendment also includes a polic�• to not allo�v de��elopinent of the area until a full '17'R anal�•sis is complete. 7�e Ri�-er "1'errace Communit}� Plan �rocess will make finciings against the '17'R based on the land uses proposed. r1� a result, the amendment to the"1'igard C��mrrehensi�•c Plan is in compliance u�th Goal 12. Statewide I'lanning Goal 13:Enetgy Conservation Land and uses developed on the land shall be managed and controlled so as to maximize the conservation of all forms of energy,based on sound economic principles. Findines: 'l�hc Cin• i� currentl�� in c�mpliancc ��th Goal l3 thrc�u};h its ackno��-lcdgcd (;omprchensi�-c I'lan. "1'he ame»dment does not alter thc Ciri�'s compliance �t�ith Goal 13. <1s a result, the amendment to thc'1'i�ard Comprehensi�-e ]'lan is in�compliance�vith Goal l3. Stateu•ide Planning Goa114: Urbanization To provide for an orderly and efficient transition form rural to urban land use, to accommodate urban population and urban employment inside urban growth boundaries, to ensure efficient use of land,and to provide for livable communities. F'inciin�s: '1'hc (:in• is currentl�� in c�mJ�liance with (��al 1� and Aletro's Title 11: Planning f�r New t'rban .�reas throu�;h its 1CI:I7OR'lcdged Com}�rehe»sire Plan and land use regulations. The Cih� also has a �i};ned �`rUan Planrun� _lrca .�lgrecmcnt and C`rban Semices :\greement as reyuircd bt� ORS 195.0G5 and ORS 197. 'I'he proposcd amendment �vill update thc 'I'igard Comprehensi��e Plan map and policies to prepare for the future dc��clopment of the Ri�-cr '1'crrace :1rca. 'I'he area has been brou�;ht into the urban �rc��th bc�undan� (.lreas G3 and G-� in 2l)02; Ro�� Rogers \�i'est in 2l)11) and a concept Plan a�mpleted. The concept Plan �vas a collaboration of man}� •takeholders, re�;ulaton' a�;encies, a�d local jurisdictions. The amendment �vill set the �tage for the transfonnadon of the concept plan into a commu�un' plan ��herc thc a�plicauon of zoning and regulauons �vill take place. 1'he communih� plan �t�ill pro�•ide reliable infonnation to make findings a�;ainst all requirements of Title 11. "1'he prc�posed amendment is a tirst step tc� set esrectations fi�r the commu�iin• planning process. 1'he concej�t plan found comPliance �vith "1'itle 11 reyuirements a►id the communin• plan �t�ill be reyuired ro do the �ame. "11�e cin•�vc�rked �cith rletro, the Oregon Dej�artment c>f'l�rans�ortation and Oregon llepartment ��f l,and Co»sen•atic>n and De��elc�pm�nt staffs tc� ensure thrir c�ncerns til'.U�I�RI�:I'c1R"I "I'(1'IIII•:I'I..\\\I\c�i:c)V\11Sti111\ (.P,\?(IL'-IKMN13 1'.\(;1�. 1�1OI�17 ��ere addressed for the proposed amcndments. 'I'he�� were pro�•idcd the opPortunih� ro rc��iew and comment on all work leadin�up to the document proposed for adopuon. The adopuon of the proposed amendment (CPA2012-(10UO2) d�es n�t alter thc (;in�'s compliance�vith Goal 14. The amendment is consistent�vith this goal. CONCLUSION: Based on the anal}•sis abo��e, the Commission finds that the proposed amendment is consistent«dth the applicable State«-ide Plamvng Goals. SECTION VI. ADDITIONAL CITY STAFF COMMENTS The Ciry of Tigard's Community Development Department, Administrative Department, Finance Department, Public Works Department, and Police Department ha�•e had an opportunit�� to re��ie�v this propc�sal and ha�-e no objections. CONCLUSION: Based on no comment from Cih' staff, staff finds the proposed amendment does not interfere with the best interests of tlie City�. SECTION VII. OUTSIDE AGENCY COMMENTS The following a�encies/jurisdicrion� had an opportunin• tc� re�-iew this Pmposal and did n�t respond: Ciry of King City City of Tualatin Clean Water Services Metro Land Use and Planning Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development Oregon Department of Transportation, Region 1 Oregon Department of Transportation, Region 1, District 2A Tualatin Hill Parks and Recreation District Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Tualatin Valley Water District 'The follo��7ng agencies/jurisdicuc�ns had an o�Portucun� to re�-ic�v this pro�osal and scnt in comments that are found as .-lttachments l and ... City of Beaverton Washington County,Department of Land Use and Transportation Findin�s: \�'ashin�ton Counh� ��as supp�>rtit•c �f the proPosed amendment and recommcnded also adopring other elements of the \�'est Bull l�it. Concept Plan, such as parks, trails and strcet classifications. The cih' is prc�posing this amendmem as a first step in compleang the rec�uired communin� plan E�r the area. The aforemention�d clements �vill be revie�ved and refined �s necessan• durin� the rrocess and incorPorated into the respecti��e cih' tnaster plans. "1'he proposed amendment is in compliance with statc and regional reyuirements. t'poltcd master plans �vill bc adopted durin� thr communin• planning process and �vill ensure COIIUI]U((j compliance ��rith srate and re�;ic�nal reyuireinentc. Staff recotnmends no changes tc> the j�ro�<�sed amendment Uased on th�\\'ashin�ton (.ounh' comments. til.U�l�Itl•:I'c�R'I I'c� l'lll:I'L\'�\I�(;�:(1\I\iltiSlc�\ (:l'\3�112-(NMN12 I'.\(�I•: 15l)I� 17 "I'he cit�� of Heaverton recommended adding policie� that addressed the imj�ortance of coordination among the hvo ciues and other ageric�� partners and de��eloping cooperaure agreements for phasing of irnprovements along the boundary of Ri�•er Terrace and South Coo�er iliountain c�mmuniry plan areas. The citt� of '1'igard acknowled�es the importance of coordination during the planrun� process and has been in frcyuent discussions �vith agenc}' partners. It is important and inherent in an�• large rlaniun� process. 7'i�;ard has con�>ened the concept plan technica] ad�•isor�' committee to ensure informati�n is being shared throughout the plannin� process. "1'igard has also met �vith Bea��ertc>n staff a number of ames and �vill condnue to do so throughout the process. T1�e cin• of'I'igard has acknowledged the importance of coordination bt• se�°eral adopted policies currend}� in the Tigard Comprehensi��e Plan. Some examples include Polic�� 2.1.3, Polic�• 5.1.�t, I'olicv G?.2,Polic��7.1.3,Polic}� 1 l.l.?, Polic`� 11.3.2, Policy 12.5.1 and Polic�• 12.5.:i. 'I'igard is in full support of coc�rdination of plannin�efforts. 1'he cin�'s River'I'erracr Communit�• Plan �vork program has induded the importance of coordinauon, as has the 1'igard Comprehensi�-e Plan. Staff recommends no changes to the pro�osed amendment bascd on the il'aslvngton Counh• comments. CONCLUSION: Based on responses from outsidr agencies li�ted abo�re, the (:ommis�ion fiiids the proposed aincndment mcets all reyuirements of tliese agencies arid is consistent��7th thc bcst interests of the Cin•. SECTION VIII. CONCLUSION 1'he rro�osed chan�;ec com�ly with the ap�licablc State�vide I'lannin�; Goal�, apj�lic:�ble rr�ional, state and federal re�ulations, the '1'igard Comprehensi�� Plan, and applicaUle �ro�•isions of the Cin>'s implcmenun�ordinances. `I'herefore, Staff recommends that thc Plannin�; Cominis�ion recc>mmend appro�-al of the Comprchensi<<e Plan ,lmendment to the "Tigard Cin' Council as deternuned through the public hearing pmcess. ATTACHMENT: ATTACHMENT 1: CITY OF BEAVERTON COMMENTS ATTACHMENT 2:WASHINGTON COUNTY COMMENTS EXHIBIT A: PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. tiI'\l�l�RI:1'(lltl I'(� I'Iil{I'I,.\\\i\(�t:(i\1�11titi1c1` t:P\2U1?-IwKNi? I'.\(�I?16OI�17 / !� !/" �~ � �l/ �— Nocember 26,2012 PREPARED BY: Darren V6'yss DATE Senior Planner � . �� ,� . �;, %-' y1 �� l C(�� lovember 26. 2012 APPRO�'ED BY: 'To�McGuire DATE Interim Community Development Director 51'Al�l�Ith:('OR'1'7'O'l7 fE P1.ANNING CU�1111SS1UN CPA 2012-00002 I'AG1:17 OI�17 � .� �� Beaverton O R [ G n N Community and Economic Development November 21, 2012 Darren 1Nyss, Senior Planner . City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tlgard, OR 97223 � RE: Comments for Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA)2012-00002—Adopt West Bull MT Concept Plan Recommended land Uses and Assoclated Policles Dear Mr. Wyss: The City of Seaverton has reviewed the proposed Tigard Comprehensive Plan Text Changes and offers the comments listed below. As you know, the City of Beaverton is preparing to launch a public planning process for the South Cooper Mountain area located just north of SW Scholls Ferry Road and SW 175`". Approximately 544 acres of what is also known as Urban Reserve Area (URA) 6B was added to the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) in October 2011. One of the conditions Metra placed on the UGB expansion requires the City of Beaverton to prepare a concept plan for the entirety of URA 6B (1,776 acres) as wel) as a community plan and corresponding comprehensive plan provisions and land use regulations for that portion of South Cooper Mountain now in the UGB, The City Council approved annexation of this 544- acre territory on November 13,2012. Given the numerous common transportation, sewer, water, starmwater management, natura) resource, and trails and transit service issues Involved in the River Terrace planning effort and Beaverton's upcoming South Cooper Mountain pro)ect,the city suggests that policies be added regarding Inter-jurisdictionai coordination and cooperation as follows: • Transportation & transit: It is recommended #hat pollcies be added requiring coordination among the two cities, Washington County, TriMet and ODOT to address transportation and #ransit, including timing of needed improvements and funding strategies and mechanisms. • Sewer, water and stormwater mana�ement: Policies requiring coordinatfon among the two cities and Clean Water Servfces should be added to address common sewer, water and storm water management issues. � City of Beaverton •4755 SW Gri(fith Drive•PO Box 4755 • Beaverton,OR 9707�•www.BeavertonOreyon.gov . • Natura) resources: In addition, the city suggests a policy be added regarding coordination among the two citles, Metro, Tualatln Hilis Parks & Recreatlon District and Washington County to address protectlon and enhancement of natural resources in the area, provision of access to public lands and natural features, Inciuding planning for trafls and pedestrian and bicycle travel to access these lands and features, and connect with other local and regional traiis. • Inter�overnmenta) A�reements; The city recommends adding a policy regarding cooperative agreements among the two cities, Washington County, CWS, and other applicable service providers to address phasing of development along SW Scholls Ferry and SW 175�"/Roy Rogers, including timing of transportatlon sewer, water and stormwater Improvements needed to support urban development in the River Terrace and South Cooper Mountain cammunity plan areas. The City of Beaverton bel(eves it is critical that the two jurisdictions coordinate particularly closely in the analysis of transportation and utilities, and cooperate with partne� jurisdiMlons and districts to find solutlons to meet the challenges we face in providing services to these urbanizing areas. It would be mutually beneficial for the cities to work together on devetoping financing strategies to take advantage of economies of scale and spread the costs of infrastructure over a larger area. . Thank you for the opportunity to comment on Tigard's proposed Comprehensive Plan Text Changes. We look forward to coordinating with you as both cities move forward with thelr respective planning efforts. Slncerely/ / , %;l ,% j � r'�� ' ��'�� Steven Sparks,AI � Planning Manager � � WASHINGTON C4UNTY �c� . OREGON � November 20,2012 City of Tigazd Planning Division Attn.: Mr. Darren Wyss, Senior Planner 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard,OR 97223 RE: CPA2012-OQ02 Dear Mr. Wyss, T'he county appreciates the opportunity to participate in the city's planning of River Terrace and looks forward to completion of the River Terrace plan. The county supports the adoption of the West Bull Mountain Concept Plan into the city of Tigard's Comprehensive Plan. The county would also encourage the city's Comprehensive Plan to be amended to include other elements of the Concept Plan,such as parks,traits and street classifications. Please let me know if you have any questions. I can be reacherl by phone at(503) 846-8817 or via e-mail at paul schaefer ,co.washington.or.us. Thank you ��'��`�'�� c� Paul Schaefer Senior Planner T:�PLNG\WPSHAftE1PAULS1WestBullMm River Terrace�CPA2012-00002.doc Dcpartment of Land Use &Transportation • Long Range Planning Division 155 N. First Avenue, Suite 350-14, Hillsboro,OR 97124-3072 phone: (503) 846-3519 • fax: (503) 846-4412 P�rkins COI� n�o N.W.Couch Street,Tenth Floor Portland,OR 97zog-4iz8 Michael C.Robinson vHONe:5o3.7z7.z000 ►HONE:�SO3��I7-ZL� R�x: (503)346-2264 Fnu:5o3.7z7.z2z� aa�iL: MRobinson�perkinscoie.com www.perkinscoie.com December 3, 2012 VIA E-MAIL Mr. Tom Anderson, President City of Tigard Planning Commission City of Tigard City Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: City of Tigard File No. CPA 2012-00002; River Terrace Comprehensive Plan Map and Text Amendments Dear President Anderson and Members of the Tigard Planning Commission: I represent West Hills Development Company("West Hills"). I am writing on behalf of West Hills concerning the proposed River Terrace Comprehensive Plan map and text amendments. By adopting these comprehensive plan amendments now,the City of Tigard is setting the stage for the adoption of the River Terrace Community Plan and implementing land use regulations. West Hills very much appreciates the City's work on these amendments because West Hills is ready to develop its properties in the River Terrace area. The proposed map and text amendments,while setting the stage for the River Terrace Community Plan and implementing land use regulations,will not allow urban development in the R.iver Terrace area until such time as the Community Plan, including land use regulations,is adopted. Therefore,while proposed Comprehensive Plan Goal 14.3,Policy 6,provides that the proposed land use designations will be the basis for the Community Plan and that refinements to the map amendments "shall be considered during the public planning process for the River Terrace Community Plan," West Hills would like the Planning Commission to know that it will be important to adopt some refinements.to the land use designation. While there may be other refinements, a significant refinement will be the location and size of the proposed open space designation in River Terrace. 37165-0000/LEGAL2528164d.1 ANCHORAGE • BEIIING � BELLEVUF • BOISE • CHICAGO � OALLAS � DENVER • LOS ANGELES • MADISON • NFW YORK DALO AlTO • PHOENIX � PORTLAND • SAN DIEGO • SAN FRANCISCO • SEATTLE • SHANGHAI • WASHINGTON, D.C. Perkins Coie ur Mr. Tom Anderson, President City of Tigard Planning Commission December 3,2012 Page 2 I have asked Senior Planner Darren Wyss to place this letter before you at tonight's public hearing and to provide me with written notice of the City Council's decision on these amendments. Very truly yours, � c Michael C. Robinson MCR:cfr Cc: Mr. Wally Remmers(via email) Mr. Dan Grimberg(via email) Mr. Tom Brian(via email) Mr. Darren Wyss(via email) 37165-0OOO/LEG AL2 5281644.1 Perkins COi� nxo N.W.Couch Street,Tenth Floor Portland,OR 97zog-4��8 Michael C.Robinson PHONE:50j.]2].2000 PHONE:�SO3��2�'�LZG4 FAx:5o3.7z7.zzzz F�x: (503)346-2264 www.perkinscofe.com eM�a: MRobinson�perkinscoie.com December 10, 2012 VIA E-MAIL Mayor Craig E. Dirksen City of Tigard City Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 � Re: City of Tigard File Comprehensive Plan Amendment(CPA) 2012-0002 Dear Major Dirksen and Members of the Tigard City Council: This office represents West Hills Development Company("West Hills"). I am writing on behalf of West Hills to support the Planning Commission recommendation that the City Council adopt map and text amendments to the Comprehensive Plan to begira the process of urban development for the River Terrace Community Plan area. The proposed amendments are an important first step in the development of the River Terrace Community Plan area. While the Concept Plan wil(obviously need to be refined,as provided for in proposed Goal 14.3, Policy 6,adopting the map and text amendments now begins the process of the community planning effort. Further,the proposed text amendments to Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goal 14, "Urbanization,"will support the City's efforts to adopt the River Tenace Community Plan. Especially important in this effort will be the satisfaction of the Transportation Planning Rule, as described in proposed Goal 14.3, Policy 12. West Hills requests that the City Council follow the P(anning Commission recommendation and adopt the proposed Comprehensive Plan map and text amendments. Very tru(y yours, c- Michael C. Robinson MCR:cfr Cc: Mr. Wally Remmers (via email) Mr. Dan Grimberg(via email) Mr. Tom Brian(via email) Mr. Darren Wyss (via email) ANCHORAGE � BEIIING • BELLEVUE • BOISE • CHICAGO � DAlLAS • DENVfR • l05 ANGELES • MADISON • MENLO PARK FHOENIX • PORTIAND • SAN DIEGO • SAN FRANCISCO • SEATTLE • SHANGHAI • WASHINGTON, D.C. 37165-0020/LEGAL25321498.1 Perkins Coie uP F � y �,�D`� De artment of Land Conservation and Develo ment �- ;��, �r� �11 p P , K• � �1 � 635 Capitol Street,Suite 150 '� �� ''",:O�I Salerr�OR 97301-2540 ��. �;C ty .'�,21 TluodueRKuhng�ski,Go�euor (503)373-0050 ��,.�..��`'�.�� Fax(503)378-5518 ��.�1�5 g.,.-r eswwlcd-s tate-or.us NOTICE OF ADOPTED AMENDMENT � 12/18/2012 TO: Subscribers to Notice of Adopted Plan or Land Use Regulation Amendments FROM: Plan Amendment Program Specialist SUBJECT: City of Tigard Plan Amendment DLCD File Number 003-12 The Department of Land Conservation and Development(DLCD) received the attached notice of adoption. A Copy of the adopted plan amendment is available for review at the DLCD office in Salem and the local government office. Appeal Procedures* DLCD ACKNOWLEDGMENT or DEADL[NE TO APPEAL: Thursday, January 03,2013 This amendment was submitted to DLCD for review prior to adoption pursuant to ORS 197.830(2)(b) only persons who participated in the local government proceedings leading to adoption of the amendment are eligible to appeal this decision to the Land Use Board of Appeals(LUBA). If you wish to appeal,you must file a notice of intent to appeal with the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) no later than 21 days from the date the decision was mailed to you by the local government. If you have questions, check with the local government to determine the appeal deadline. Copies of the notice of intent to appeal must be served upon the local government and others who received written notice of the final decision from the local government. The notice of intent to appeal must be served and filed in the form and manner prescribed by LUBA,(OAR Chapter 661, Division 10). Please call LUBA at 503-373-1265, if you have questions about appeal procedures. *NOTE: The Acknowledgment or Appeal Deadline is based upon the date the decision was mailed by local government.A decision may have been mailed to you on a different date than it was mailed to DLCD.As a result,your appeal deadline may be earlier than the above date specified. NO LUBA Notification to the jurisdiction of an appeal by the deadline,this Plan Amendment is acknowled�ed. Cc: Darren Wyss, City of Tigard Gordon Howard, DLCD Urban Planning Specialist Anne Debbaut, DLCD Regional Representative <paa> Y � . .. ❑ ,�, ��.+;�,;� ❑ el�ch.r,�- ❑ ;,:,tiled � � O RZ DLCD M . Notice of Adoption This Form 2 must be mailed to DLCD within 5-Working Davs after the Final � Ordinance is si�ned by the public Official Designated by the jurisdiction and all other requirements of ORS ]97.615 and OAR 660-0 l 8-000 '`" " ' ` � `` ' Jurisdiction: City of Tigard Local file number: CPA2012-00002 Date of Adoption: 12/11/2012 Date Mailed: 12/13/2012 Was a Notice of Proposed Amendment (Form 1) mailed to DLCD? � Yes ❑ No Date: 10/29/2012 � Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment � Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment ❑ Land Use Regulation Amendment ❑ Zoning Map Amendment ❑ New Land Use Regulation ❑ Other: Summarize the adopted amendment. Do not use technical terms. Do not write "See Attached". The city of Tigard adopted comprehensive plan map designations for the River Terrace Community Plan area based on recommended land uses found in Washington County's West Bull Mt. Concept Plan and adopted associated policies into Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goal 14 to provide guidance during and after the preparation of the River Terrace Community Plan. Does the Adoption differ from proposal? Yes, Please explain below: Four additional policies were adopted to help provide guidance for the area during and after the community planning process. Plan Map Changed from: County FD-20 to: Urban - Zone Map Changed from: N/A to: N/A 4 Location: River Terrace Community Plan Area Acres Involved: 500 Specify Density: Previous: N/A New: N/A Applicable statewide planning goals: 1 2 3 4 S 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 � � ❑ ❑ � � � � � � � � � � ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Was an Exception Adopted? ❑ YES � NO Did DLCD receive a Notice of Proposed Amendment... 35-days prior to first evidentiary hearing? � Yes ❑ No If no, do the statewide planning goals apply? ❑ Yes ❑ No If no, did Emergency Circumstances require immediate adoption? ❑ Yes ❑ No DLCD file No. Please list all affected State or Federal Agencies, Local Governments or Special Districts: Metro, Clean Water Services, Washington County � Local Contact: Darren Wyss Phone: (503) 718-2442 Extension: Address: 13125 SW Hall Blvd Fax Number: 503-718-2748 City: Tigard Zip: 97223- E-mail Address: darren@tigard-or.gov ADOPTION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS This Form 2 must be received bv DLCD no later than 5 working davs after the ordinance has been signed bv the public official designated bv the iurisdiction to sign the approved ordinance(s) per ORS 197.615 and OAR ChaQter 660, Division 18 1. This Form 2 must be submitted by local jurisdictions only (not by applicant). 2. When submitting the adopted amendment, please print a completed copy of Form 2 on light green paper if available. 3. Send this Form 2 and one complete paper copv (documents and maps)of the adopted amendment to the address below. 4. Submittal of this Notice of Adoption must include the final signed ordinance(s), all supporting finding(s), exhibit(s) and any other supplementary information(ORS 197.615 ). 5. Deadline to appeals to LUBA is calculated twenty-one(21)days from the receipt(postmark date) by DLCD of the adoption (ORS 197.830 to 197.845 ). 6. In addition to sending the Form 2 -Notice of Adoption to DLCD,please also remember to notify persons who participated in the local hearing and requested notice of the final decision. (ORS 197.615 ). 7. Submit one complete paper copy via United States Postal Service,Common Carrier or Hand Carried to the DLCD Salem Of�ice and stamped with the incoming date stamp. 8. Please mail the adopted amendment packet to: ATTENTION: PLAN AMENDMENT SPECIALIST DEPARTMENT OF LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT 635 CAPITOL STREET NE,SUITE 150 SALEM, OREGON 97301-2540 9. Need More Copies? Please print forms on 8'/z-1/2x11 green paper only if available. If you have any questions or would like assistance, please contact your DLCD regional representative or contact the DLCD Salem Office at(503) 373-0050 x238 or e-mail plan.amendments(a�state.or.us. http://www.ore�on.QOV/LCD/forms.shtml Updated December 30,2011 . . . . . . , ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3.Also complete A. Signature kem 4'rf Restricted Delivery is desired. ❑Agent i ■ Print your name and address on the reverse ❑Addressee � so that we Can retum the C8r'd t0 you. B. Received by(Printed Name) C. ate of Delivery ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, I or on the front if space permits. • < <� Z ', D. Is delivery address different from ite 1? ❑Yes I 1. Article Addressed to: If YES,enter delivery address below: �No I I I ATTN PLAN AMENDMENT SPECIALIST � DEPT OF LAND USE&CONSERVATION f 635 CAPITOL STREET NE SUITE 150 3 �� SALEM OR 97301-2540 �!Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail ❑Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ Insured Mail ❑C.O.D. a. aestricced�e�ive►YJ(Extra Feel ❑ves � 2. Article Number (fransfer from service/abel) 7 0�6 0 810 �0 0 2 4 5 2 4 9 7 7 8 PS Form 3811,February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt to25s5-02-M-t5ao Printed Agenda http://agendas.tiga-' �.gov/print_agenda.cfm?seq=494&reloadedrt... a " City nf�'1'i�arci � , , Ti�ard Business Meetin;—A�enda TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING MEETING DATE AND TIME: December 11,2012-G:30 p.m.Study Session;730 p.m.Business Meeting MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard-Town Hall- 13125 SW I-Iall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 PUBLIC NOTICE: .lnyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign-up sheet(s).If no sheet is available,ask to be recognized by the:�layor at the beginning of that agenda item.Citizen Commurucation items are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future.�genda by contacting either the 1�layor or the City i�fanager. Times noted are e.rtimated,•it is recommended that persons interested in testifying be present by 7:15 p.m.to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet.Buriners agenrla itenu can be heard!n any orrler after 7:30 p.m. .�ssistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for C�uncil meeungs by noon on the�fonday prior to the Council meeting.Please call 503-G39-4171,ext.2410(voice)or 503-G84-2772(TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Dea�. Upon request,the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: • C2ualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments;and • C�ualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers,it is important ro allow as much lead dme as possible. Please notify the Ciry of your need by 5:00 p.m.on the Thursday preceding the meeting by calling:503-639-4171,ext.2410(voice) or 503-684-2772(I'DD -Telecommunications Devices for the Dea�. SEE.�TT.�CHED.�GEND.� VIEW LIVE VIDEO STRE.�I�4ING ONLINE: htt�•//www tvctv org/QOVernment-programming/government-meetings/tigard C��BLE VIEWER.S:The regular Ciry Council meeung is shown live on Channel 28 at 7:30 p.m.The meeting will be rebroadcast at the following times on Channel 28: Thursday 6:00 p.m. Sunday 11:00 a.m. Friday 10:00 p.m. Monday 6:00 a.m. 1 of 6 12/11/2012 12:19 PM Printed Agenda http://agendas.tigard-nr�*ov/print_agenda.cfin?seq=494&reloaded=t... 1 a � Citt° of�'I'i�;arc�i � . , Ti�ard Busii3ess Meetin�--A�;eiida TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING DATE AND TIME: December 11,2012-G:30 p.m.Study Session;7:30 p.m.Business;�feeting MEETING LOCATION: City oE Tigard-Town Hall- 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 6:30 Pl�i • STUDY SESSION r1. .�dministrative Items Reviewed -Councilor��'ilson-Non-.lgenda Item Council Calendar: December 18 Farewell�Ieeting-�layor Dirksen and Councilor Wilson;G:30 reception;7:30 special meeting. 25 Christmas Holiday-No meeting-City offices closed. January 1 New Year s Holiday-No CCD.�meeting-City Hall offices closed. 8 Special i�4eeung-G:30 reception,7:30 swearing-in ceremonies,inaugural Remarks,election of council president. 10 Special Meering-9 a.m.to 5 p.m.at Fanno Creek House;council groundrules,council liaison appointments,2013 council goal setnng. 15 Workshop�feeting-G:30 p.m. 21 Marun Luther King Jr.Day-City Hall offices closed. 22 Business:�feeang-6:30 p.m.Study Session;7:30 p.m.Business:�feeting. February 12 tipecial:�feeting,Tigard to host a joint meering with the City of Beaverton(time to be determined). 18 Presidents Day-City Hall offices closed. 19 Workshop Meetting,6:30 p.m. 26 Business Meeung-6:30 p.m.Study Session;7:30 p.m.Business I�leeting. • • EXECUTI�'E SESSION:The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session.If an Executive Session is called to order,the appropriate ORS citation will be announced identifying the applicable statute.�11 discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the 5ession.Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions,as provided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed.No Execuuve Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision.Executive Sessions are closed [o the public. 2 of 6 12/11/2012 12:19 PM Printed Agenda http://agendas.tigar' �.gov/print_agenda.cfm?seq=494&reloaded=t... 7:30 PD1 1. BUSINE5S;�1EETING-DECEMBER 11,2012 .�. Call to Order B. Roll Call C. Pledge of.111egiance D. Council Communications&Liaison Reports Council President Buehner-Liaison Report E. Call to Council and Staff for Non-.�genda Items 2. CITIZEN COMMUNIC.jTION (Two;�finutes or Less,Please) 7:35 p.m.- time is esamated .�. Follow-up to Previous Ciuzen Communication B. Tigard High School Student Envoy(Note to Council President: Megan Risinger(rice-n-grrr)might be unable to attend; if not,she will attempt to find a substitute.) C. Tigard.1rea Chamber of Commerce- (Note to Council President: No report this evening;CEO Debi Mollahan will give a report at the next available business meeting,which will be January 22,2013.) D. Citizen Communicarion—Sign Up Sheet 3. PROCL.�IM DECE�iBER 9-15 AS HU;vi<-1N RIGHTS WEEK 7:45 p.m.-time is estimated (Note to Council Presidenr. Tigard's�lssistant Police Chief Jim de Sully will be present for this proclamation representing the Human Rights Council of Washington County) 4. CONSENT�GEND.�:(Tigard City Council and Ciry Center Development.-lgency)These items are considered roudne and may be enacted in one mouon without separate discussinn..�nyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate acaon.;�lotion to: 7:50 p.m.-time is estimated A. .�pprove City Council Meering/City Center Development�lgency I�ieeting I��inutes for: 1. tieptember 25,2012 2. October 2,2012 B. Receive and File: L OEficial November 6,2012 Election Results-Elecdng a I�fayor,Two City Councilors,and a Charter l�mendment "Vote Required to Use Certain Funds for Light Rail Construcdon." 2. Council Calendar 3. Council Tentative�lgenda for Future:�feeting Topics C. Appoint Dlelody Graeber,Don Fisher and Cathy Hearn to the Budget Committee and rlppoint;�lelanie Boekee as an Alternate:�Sember-Resoluuon RESOLUTI(�N NO. 12-46-�RESOLUTION APPOINTING�fELODY GR�EBER,DON FISHER.�ND C.-1T�-Il'HE.�RN TO THE BUDGET COM;�tITTEE AND.-1PPOINTING:�fEL.�NIE BOEKEE�S,�N .�LTERN.ITE ME:�IBER. D. Appoint Peter Hedgecock to the�ludit Committee-Resoluuon RESOLUTION NO. 12-47-.-1 RESOLUTION APPOINTING PETER HEDGECOCK TO THE.�UDIT C01�1MITTEE,BEGINNING ON J�-1NUARY 1,2013 3 of6 12/1]/2012 12:19 PM Printed Agenda http://agendas.tigard-�r�ov/print_agenda.cfin?seq=494&reloaded=t... E. Reappoint l�fatthew i�4uldoon and.�ppoint Timothy L.Gaschke and Brian K Feeney as�'oting nfembers to the Planning Commission-Resolution RESULUITON 12-48-.1�tiOLUTION RE.�PPOINTING:�LITTHEW MULDOON AND.1PPOINTING TI:�fOTI-IY L.G.�SCHKE.�ND BRI.�N K.FEENEY.1ti VOTING�fE:�iBERS TO THE PL..�NNING COMI�iI5SION F. �lppoint Laura Fisher,Tamera Slack and Paul�liller as�'oting:�fembers and Carine.lrendes and Hemendra �llathur as .�lternates to the City Center.�dvisory Commission-Resolution RESOLUTION NO. 12-49-��REtiOLUTION.�PPOINTING L.�UR.�FISHER,T.1A1ER�1 SL�CK.-�ND P.�UL MILLER.�S VOTING ME1�IBERS OF THE CITY CENTER ADVISORY CO�f�fISSION�1ND.�PPOINTING C.�RINE.IRENDES.�ND HE:�IENDR1:�i��THUR.-1S ALTERN.�TES TO THE CITY CENTER.�DVISORY COMMISSION G. .�ppoint Jennifer Stanfield,Donald Schmidt,Evelyn i�furphy Mark Bogert and George Hetu as Voting Members to the Tigard Transportation Advisory Committee-Resolution RESOLUTION NO. 12-50-.1 RESOLUTION.�PPOINTING JENNIFER ST.INFIELD,DON.�LD SCH;�fIDT, E�'ELYN�fURPI-iY,1��.�RK BOGERT,.1ND GEORGE HETU.�S VOTING:�tE:�IBERS OF THE TIG.�RD TR��N5PORT�-1TION��D�'ItiOR7�'CO�f:�fITTEE(1"I'.�C) H. .�pprove the Purchase of the Rankin Property and.�uthorize the City i�lanager to Complete the Property Purchase- Resolution RESOLUTION NO. 12-51 -.�RESOLUTION.�PPRO�'ING THE PURCH.�SE OF THE R�NKIN PROPERTY, (T.�X LOT 2S1 04D.�03500).�ND.�UTHORIZING THE CITY��.�N.�GER TO T.�KE ALL NECESSARY .�CTION TO COMPLETE TI-IE PROPERTY PURCH.ISE ON BEHaLF OF THE CITY I. .�mend Ciry 1�4anager's Employment:lgreement • Conrent Agenda-Itemr Aemoverlfor Se�arate Diacu.r.rion:Airy itemt requerte�!to Ge removed fmm tbe Conrent Agenda for reparate diri�u,ction will Ge coari�lere�!immedrately afterthe Counci!/Ci1y CenterDeuelopmentAgency has voter!on tbore item,r mhich do not neer! di.rcu.c.rion. 4 of6 12/11/2012 12:19 PM Printed Agenda http://agendas.tigar' -.gov/print_agenda.cfm?seq=494&reloaded=t... . � 5. LEGISL.�TIVE PUBLIC HE.�RING-TIG.�RD CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER�TION OF.�N ORDIN.�NCE .�DOPTING CO:t1PREHENSIVE PLAN.1:�fEND�1ENT CP.�2012-00002 TO��1;�SEND THE TIG:�RD COMPREI-IENSIVE PLAN NL-1P TO INCLUDE L.�1ND USE DESIGN.�TIONS FOR THE RIVER TERR�CE CO�f:�1UNITY PL..�N.�1RE.-�B.�SED ON RECOI�I:�IENDED L.�ND USES FOUND IN W.�SHINGTON COUNTY'S WEST BULL MOUNT.�IN CONCEPT PI..1N.�ND.-1'�fEND THE CURRENT TIG.�RD C0;�IPREHENSIVE PL�1N GO.�L 14:URB.�NIZ.ITION POLICIES 7:55 p.m.-time is estimated Proposal: To amend the current Tigard Comprehensive Plan:tfap to include map designations for the River Terrace Communiry Plan area based on recommended land uses found in Washington County's West Bull�fountain Concept Plan;to amend current Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goal 14;Urbanizaaon goals,polices,and recommendation actions. .�pplicanr: Ciry of Tigard,Oregon, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,Oregon 97223 Location: River Terrace Community Plan.�rea .�pplicable Review Criteria: Development Code Chapters 18.380 and 18.390;Comprehensive Plan Goals 1,2,5,6,7,8, 9,10,11,12,13 and 14;i�letro Functional Plan Title 11;and Statewide Planning Goals 1,2,5,6,7,8,9,10, 11,12,13 and 14. • Open Public Hearing • Review Hearing Procedures:City.�ttorney • Declarations or Challenges:Does any Council member wish to declare or discuss a conElict of interest or abstention. • Staff Report:Community Development Department • Public Testimony o Proponents o Opponents o Rebuttal • titaff Recommendation • Council Questions • Close Public Hearing • Council Consideration:Ordinance ORDINl1NCE NO. 12-12-��1N ORDIN�INCE:�DOPTING COMPREHENSI�'E PL��N.�MENDI�IENT CP.1 2012-00002 TO�1I�fEND TH�TIG.�RD COMPR�I IENSIVE PL1�N �I.�P TO INCLUDE L.-1ND USE DESIGN.�TIONS FOR THE RIVER TERR�CE COI�L'�fUNITY PI.��1N.�RE.�B.�tiED ON RECOMMENDED L.1ND USES FOUND IN W.-15HINGTON COUNTY'S WEST BULL MT.CONCEPT PL.�N.�ND.�I�1END THE CURRENT TIG.�RD COMPREI-IENSIVE PI.��N G0.1L 14:URB:INIZ.�ITION POLICIES G. LEGISL.-1TIVE PUBLIC HE.�RING FOR TIG��RD CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER�ITION OF AN ORDIN��NCE.�DOPTING COI�iPREHENSI�'E PL.-1N:�MEND:�4ENT CP.1 2012-00001 AND DE�'ELOP;�fENT CODE.�;�1END:�fENT DC�3 2012-00002 TO.�;�fEND THE CITY OF TIG.�RD 2035 TR�NSPORT.�TION SYSTEi�f PL.-1N 1�ND TIG.�RD DE�'ELOP;�ZENT CODE C�I,�PTER.S 18.370,18.610, .jND 18.810 TO Ii�iPLE1�fENT STREET CONNECTI�'ITY��ND D�SIGN ST.1ND.1RD5 FROhi THE DOWNTOWN TIG.�RD CONCEPTU.�L CONNECTIVIT'Y PL:-1N 8:30 p.m.- time is estimated Proposal: To amend the City of Tigard 2035 Tcansportation System Plan and Tigard Development Code(Tide 18) Chapters 18.370, 18.610 and 18.810 to implement the street connectiviry and design standards recommended to the Downtomn Tigard Conceptua!Connectivity Plan. .�pplicant: City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,Oregon 97223 Location: Downtown Mixed Use Central Business District Zoning: MU-CBD Comp Plan: I�lixed Use Central Business Disuict .�pplicable Review Criteria: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380 and 18.390;Camprehensive Plan Goals 1, Citizen Involvement;2,Land Use Planrung,9,Economic Development;11,Public Facilides and Services; 12, S of6 12/11/2012 12:19 PM Printed Agenda http://agendas.tigard-��^ov/print_agenda.cfm?seq=494&reloaded=t... Transpartation; 13,Energy Conservauon;and 15,tipecial Planning<�reas:Downtown;�'�fetro Urban Growth nlanagement Functional Plan Title G,i�fetro Regional Transpartaaon Funcuonal Plan Titles 1,2 and 5;Oregon .�dministraave Rules Chapter G60,Division 12;Statewide Planning Goals 1,2,9, 11, 12 and 13. • Open Public Hearing • Review Hearing Procedures:City.�ttorney • Declarations or Challenges:Does any Council member wish to declare or discuss a conflict of interest or abstention. • 5taff Report:Community Development Department • Public Testimony o Proponents o Opponents o Rebuttal • Staff Recommendation • Council Quesaons • Close Public Hearing • Council Considerarion:Ordinance ORDIN.�NCE NO. 12-13-.�N ORDIN.�NCE.�DOPTING CO:�iPREHENSIVE PL.�N AMENDMENT CP.� 2012-00001 1-1ND DE�'ELOP1�fENT CODE.�n4END:�iENT DC.�2012-00002 TO.��1END THE CIT'Y OF TIG��RD 2035 TR�NSPORT.-1TION SYSTEi�i PL.�N :1ND TIG.IRD DEVELOP:�IENT CODE CH.-1PTERti 18.37Q 18.G10, .�ND 18.810 TO I1�1PLE:�IENT tiTREET CONNECTIVITY.1ND DESIGN ST.�ND.�RDS FR0:�4 THE DOWNTOWN TIG��RD CONCEPTU.�L CONNECTIVITY PL��N 7. COUNCIL LI��ISON REPORTS 8. NON.-�GEND�1 ITE��IS Non-��genda I[em-Councilor Wilson 9. EXECUTI�'E SEStiION: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session.If an Execudve Session is called to order,the appxopriate ORS citation will Ue announced identifying the applicable statute..�11 discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing Erom the Session.Repzesentatives of the news media are allowed to attend �xecutive Sessions,as provided by ORS 192.GG0(4),but must not disclose any information discussed.No Execuave Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision.Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 10. ��DJOURNI�IENT 9:30 p.m.-time is estimated 6 of6 12/11/2012 12:19 PM AGENDA ITEM No. 5 December 11,2012 PLEASE PRINT This is a City of Tigard�ublic meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony become part of the�ublic record and is openly avazlable to all members of the public. The names a�id addresses of persons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. Pro onent— S eakin In Favox) O onent—(S eakin ,� ainst) I�eutral _ Name,�lddress&Phone No. Name,2,ddress&Phone No. Name,�lddress&Phone No. �11C1�tL''�L �v�t�1=v^� Il�� cU�cr 5�, _T.�i-t �'� ��.-,Ati,�,r�r� r��-�12� �a ?2"7-2�Cr Name,:',ddress&I'Uone No. Nasne,rlddress&Phone Ivo. Name,.�ddress&Phane No. Name,rlddress&Phone No. I�amc,�lddress&Phane No. Name,.�ddress&Phone No. Name,�lddress&Phone No. Name,:�ddsess&Phone No. Name,�ddress&Phone No. Name,:lddress&Pl�one N�. Name,r�ddress&l�hone No. Name,�lddress&Phone No. a P AGENDA I'I"El�I No. 5 December 11, 2012 T�� 1 �lrl� Z �1�1V�� .�� 1 � Please si�m on the following page(s) if you wish to testify before City Council on: LE��S�TI�'VE �'UB�,I� HE��I�T� - TI�ARD CIT'Y� CC�UNCiI� CONSII�E�ATI((�l� OF A.1�T C)]�.I.�II�TAI"�+�JE .�l�►O►I�'TII�� +�(JI��'I�E�3E�l�T�I�", �L.A�N A1VIE1`�TDIVIEI'�1T CPA. 2012-ODU42 TO AMEND THF,TIGARD COMPR�HENSIVE PLAN MAl''1'O INCLUDE I.t1ND USE DESIGNAT�ONS FOR TIIE RIVER TERRACE COIdIMUNITY PLAN AKEA BASED ON RECOM1i�IENDED LAND USES FOUND IN WASHINGTON COUNTY'S WEST BULL M�UNTAIN CONCEPT PLAN AND AMEND THE CURRENT TIUARD CaMPREHENSIVE PLAN GOAL 14: URAANI7_.ATIQN POLICIES 1'ro nsal: To amend the current Tigard Comprehensive Plan �fap to uicluc3e map designarions for the Kiver'1"errace Communiry Plan area based on recocnmended land uses found iri Wasliuigton Counry's W'est Bu1]Mountain Concept Plan; to ainend cuxrent"Tigard Compreh.ensive Plan Goal 14;Urbanizarion goals,pol.ices,and tecommendation actions. A��licant: City of Ti�rd, Oregon, 13125 SW I-Iall Boulevard,Tigaid,Oregoti 97223 I.ocation: River'I'errace Communit��Plan Area 1��plicable Review C;iiteria: DeveloPment Code Chapters 18.380 and 18.390; Comprehenszt•e Plan Gaals 1,2, 5, 6, 7, 8,9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14;Metro �unctianal Plan "Title 11;and Statewide Planriu�g GoaLs 1,2, 5, 6, 7, 8, ), ]0, 11, 12, 13 and 14. Tlus is a Cit��oE Tigard public meeting,subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. :lll written and oral tesumony become part of the public record and is openly available to all members of the public. T77e names and addresses of persons who attend or participate in Cit�-of Tigard public meetix�gs u�ill be included in the meeting minutes,which is a public record. Due to Time Constraints City Council May Impose A Three-Minute Time Limit on Testimony Print Agenda Item Swnmary http://agendas.tiga r.gov/print_a�memo.cfm?seq=1063&rev_nu... .\IS-10G3 5. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 12/11/2012 Length(in 40;�finutes minutes): .�genda Title: Legislauve Public Hearing-River Terrace Comprehensive Plan Amendment Submitted By: Darren Wyss,Community Development Ordinance Item Type: Public Hearing-Legisladve Meeting Type: Council Business Meeting-;�fain Public Hearing Newspaper Legal .�d Required?: Yes PuUlic Hearing Publication Date in N ewspape r: 11/15/2012 Information ISSUE tihall city council approve the planning commission's recommendation(CPA2012-00002) to amend the Tigard Comprehensive Plan map with land use designations for River Terrace and amend Tigard Compzehensive Plan Goal 14:Urbanization policies? ST.�FF RECO:�i�fEND.1TION /.�CTION REQUEtiT Staff recommends approval of the planning commission's recommendarion(CPA2012-00002)to amend the Tigard Comprehensive Plan map and Goal 14:Urbanization policies. KEY FACTS��ND INFOR.'�L�TION SU1�f�L-1RY The city has agreed via an intezgovernmental agreement(IG:1)with Washington Counry ro refine its West Bull D1t Concept Plan inro the River Terrace Community Plan.The community plan will put into place a means to implement the vision of the concept plan through zoning,development code regulations and other measures that will make urban development possible.The process will also include updates to utility,parks and transportation master plans,including the financial strategies necessary to fund and maintain required infrastructure improvements. The concept plan was created over the course of three years with the help of a stakeholder working group(SWG)and a technical advisory commitree(T.�C).Project goals and principles guided the development of the land use,transportation and parks framework maps.These maps represented the vision stakeholders agreed upon for the fumre development of the area.They provide a variety of residential densities and housing types;disperse densities throughout the communiry;provide appropriate amounts of commercial uses,parks,trails and open space;and outline a multi-modal network of connected streets and walkable blocks.The SVG'G and T.�C both voted to forward the concept plan to the Washington County Planning Commission and Board of Commissioners for consideration and adoption.In November 2010,the Planning Commission voted to recommend the Board adopt the concept plan(see.�lttachment 1).In December 2010,the Board adopted tl�e concept plan by Resolucion and Ordet(see .-lttachment 2). Since the conclusion of the concept plan,the city has annexed a portion of the area (.�rea 64)and peutions have been filed by property owners to annex the remainder of the area within the urban growth boundary(l�reas 63 and Roy Rogers West).The city will complete the River Terrace Community Plan for all of these axeas. City staff has developed a work program to guide the project through completion.This will include a lot of technical work to ensure the community plan meets the state and regional planning requirements,as well as a public involvement plan to engage stakeholders in any necesslry refinements to the concept plan as the process moves forward.Staff anticipates compleuon of the River Terrace Community Plan in summer 2014. The first recommendation is to adopt the concept plan recommended land uses (Exhibit.�)into the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. This action will set expectations for the community planning process,as well as allowing the city to access a portion of the CET Eunds from I�fetro that were given to the city through the IG��with Washington Counry..�number of policies will also be recommended for adoption to guide regulation of the River Terrace area during and after completion of the community planning process (Exhibit B).These recommended land uses will be further analyzed as part of the community planning process and iE there are needed refinements,recommendations will be brought back to planning commission and city council for adoption at the 1 of 2 12/11/2012 12:20 PM Print Agenda Item Summary http://agendas.tigard-�r�ov/print_ag_memo.cfin?seq=1063&rev_nu... end of the process. OTHER.�LTEftN.�TI VES 1.Adopt planning commission recommendation with changes 2.Not adopt planning commission recommendation and remand back to planning commission for additional work 3.Not adopt planning commission recommendation and direct staff accordingly COUNCIL OR CCDI�GO.-1LS,POLICIES,1�1.1STER PL1�NS 1.Take the Next Step on i�fajor Projects D.�TES OF PREVIOUS CON5IDER�TION Project Brief ng-:�fay 15,2012 Project BrieFng-September 18,2012 Project Briefing-Novembex 20,2012 Fiscal Impact Cost: $134,100 Budgeted(yes or no): Yes Whexe Budgeted CD (department/program): ��dditional Fiscal Notes: Washingron County transferred CET funds to the ciry for completing the communiry plan.:�fetro administers these funds and will require the completion of tasks before releasing funds. �[[achments :�ttachment 1 ��ttachment 2 .lttachment 3- CP:12012-00002 Ordinance Exhibit.-1-CP�2012-00002 Land Uses Exhibit B-CP.�2012-00002 Policies Exhibit C-CPA2012-00002 Findines 2 of2 12/1l/2012 12:20 PM . r' .. .. � WASHINGTON COUNTY �1 . OREGON v WASHINGTON COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 2010 ALL PUBLIC MEETINGS ARE RECORDED I. CALL TO ORDER: 1:02 P.M. Room 140, Public Services Building The meeting was called to order by Chair San Soucie II. ROLL CALL � Planning Commission {PC) members present: Herb Hirst, Liles Garcia, Rick Lesniak, Veta Holscher, Mary Manseau, Marc San Soucie, and Matthew Larrabee. Commissioner Scott Rickard's absence was excused. Staff present: Joanne Rice, Paul Schaefer, Traci Shirley, Steve L. Kelley, Steve D. Kelley, . Connie McCracken, and Gretchen Olson, Long Range Planning; Chris Gilmore, County Counsel. � III. DIRECTOR'S REPORT Joanne Rice gave the Director's Report. She informed the Planning Commission (PC) that Ordinance No. 730 and No. 732 were engrossed and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) on October 26, 2010. The supplemental transportation SDC and transportation funding strategy for North Bethany and the 2011 Work Program for North Bethany were also adopted. Chair San Soucie asked if the North Bethany Work Program for 2011 consisted of the placeholders. Ms. Rice answered yes. IV. WORK SESSION - Ms. Rice informed the PC that there would be no business to conduct in December. The PC ` voted to cancel the December 1, 2010 and December 15, 2010 meetings. Chair San Soucie asked what items the PC could expect to see on the Work Program for 2011. Ms. Rice answered that 2011 would be busy with carry overfrom the 2010 Work Program. Staff� would focus on Aloha/Reedville planning work, North Bethany, West Bull Mountain (WBM), and Urban and Rural Reserves. The Urban and Rural Reserves were remanded by the Oregon Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) on October 29, 2010. There was a brief discussion about the Reserves process and next steps to address the recent LCDC removal of a portion of the Urban Reserves in Washington County. Ms. Rice said she would have more information after the county received the written order from LCDC, expected in six to . eight weeks. � Ghair San Soucie asked if there would be an opportunity for the PC to review and make comments on the proposed 2011 Work Program before it goes before the BCC. Ms. Rice replied the draft Work Program is always made available to the PC for comment. Department of Land Use 86 Transportation • Long Range Planning Division 155 N. First Avenue, Suite 350-14, Hillsboro, OR 97124-3072 phone: (503) 846-3519 • fax: (503) 846-4412 • ! � Planning Commission Minutes November 3; 2010 Page 2 Commissioner Hirst suggested a Joint Dinner with the BCC as there are many new members on both the BCC and the PC. Ms. Rice said this request would be forwarded to the BCC. Chair San Soucie wanted to know if the City of Tigard had provided written comments before the letter dated November 3, 2010. Ms. Rice noted the City of Tigard had been involved in the VVBM planning process and had submitted comments on multiple occasions. She added staff intended to comment on the letter. Ms. Rice reminded the PC that this was just a Concept Plan, a precursor to the final plan, At the direction of the BCC, staff was directed to deal with only land use issues and not the governance and service provider issues through the Concept Plan. Those issues will be dealt with when the Concept Plan was developed into a Community Plan. Commissioner Manseau stated the PC typically hears ordinances and. plan amendments and asked�why WBM was a Resolution & Order(R& O). Ms. Rice replied staff wanted a way to memorialize all the work that the Stakeholders Work Group (SWG) and the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) had done on this project. They worked hard to get to an agreement of this size. The Principals and Goals, Implementing Strategies, and the Concept Plan maps all � provide a mechanism from which the Community Plan.can be developed. Commissioner Manseau clarified that the Concept Pl�an was more of an intermediate plan. Ms. Rice answered • � yes, a.partial or precursor plan. . The work session was adjourned at 1:25 p.m. V. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS There was no one present who wished to testify on a non agenda item. VI. WEST BULL MOUNTAIN CONCEPT PLAN � Ms. Rice made brief opening remarks. She noted the County began the plarining process for WBM in 2007 to prepare the Concept Plan. At the direction of the BCC, governance and service provider issues were not addressed in the Concept Plan. The BCC wanted staff to strictly focus on the land use aspects of WBM. The purpose of the R 8� O was to memorialize the work done by the SWG, TAC, and staff during the three year process. The R & O would guide the next phase of work, the creation of the Community Plan. Ms. Rice concluded by _ saying the Concept Plan is in no way meant to be a final product,just the precursor to the Community Pfan. Mr. Schaefer presented the staff report and gave a PowerPoint presentation that outlined the entire WBM planning process, including maps of the area and an overlay of the Concept Plan onto an aerial map from Google Earth. A printed version of the PowerPoint presentation was in the PC file and is available upon request. � Mr. Schaefer responded to the letters of comment received from the cities of T�gard and • Beaverton. He said it would be more appropriate if the letters were addressed at the next phase of the planning process, rather than the Concept Plan phase. The letters focused on the governance and service provider aspects of WBM and those issues are not addressed by the Concept Plan. Mr. Schaefer reiterated that it would be better to address the letters when the work is started on the Community Plans. � Planning Commission Minutes ' November 3, 2010 - . Page 3 Chair San Soucie wanted to confirm the Concept Plan was not intended to be compliant with Title 11. If it was not, he suggested it should it be called something other than "Concept Plan". Ms. Rice replied staff had considered it to be a precursor to what Metro considers a Concept Plan. She added staff could work to make the use of Concept Plan more clear. Commissioner Manseau questioned if there were documents associated with the Concept Plan that laid out the next steps of the planning process, for example, Community Plan and Code. She also questioned if there was an intermediary step befinreen the Concept Plan and � Community Plan that would be Title 11 compliant. Ms. Rice answered the BCC would decide the steps in the planning process. The BCC directed staff to concentrate on the land use issues of WBM and to not address the governance, code, or Community Plan. There was no interim step that would be Title 11 compliant. Staff was also working diligently to make sure the contract with Metro for the scope of the work was satisfied. Chair San Soucie asked if the plan meets the contract requirements with Metro. Ms. Rice answered that it did�satisfy the contract. Chair San Soucie asked if the R & O constituted a legally binding document. Ms. Rice said no, it was not intended to be a legal document. . . As there were no more questions for staff, Chair San Soucie began the public testimony phase of the hearing. Ken Dixon, 1195 NE 240th, Yamhill OR, Mr. Dixon voiced his concerns regarding the location , of parks. He said the current Concept Plan had about 12 acres of his property designated for a Community Park. He was concerned that the process was going to take a long time, as there was no identified parks provider. Mr. Dixon wanted to stress his desire that the planning for � WBM be handled in a reasonable time frame and the parks provider's acquisitions be equitable. Dan Grimberg, West Hills Development, 735 SW 158th Avenue, Beaverton OR, Mr. � Grimberg submitted a letter from Mike Robinson, legal counsel for West Hills Development. Mr. Grimberg said that the Concept Plan in general was good, but that it lacked the flexibility that the development commuriity would like to see. He suggested that the text that accompanies the Concept PVan should indicate that the road alignments and the parks and open spaces could be changed once the community plan was being developed. Mr. Grimberg also suggested that the use of a facilitator would be extremely helpful when work was being done for the code and community plan. ' John Rankin, 26715 SW Baker Road, Shervvood Or, Mr. Rankin noted that he represented eight land owners in the area. He submitted an alternate Concept Plan to the PC. He also stressed the importance of the need for.flexibility that Mr. Grimberg had discussed. Mr. Rankin suggested that the parks issue be dealt with first in the next phase, as it seems to be the most prevalent issue. He also raised issues with the"hard lines" shown on the maps for roads. Chair San Soucie asked Mr. Rankin if he had submitted his alternative Concept Plan to the �SWG or TAC. Mr. Rankin replied that he had, but it was difficult to do so. There was only a limited amount of time for people to make comments at the beginning of the meetings and the maps had to be made up for each meeting. It would have been more helpful if staff could have made the maps•or provided more maps so the Concept Plan would have been more clear. � � • Planning Commission Minutes November 3, 2010 Page 4 � Commissioner Manseau asked if it was possible for Mr. Rankin's suggestions to be incorporated into the Concept Plan. Mr. Schaefer interjected that when the alternative plans were presented to the TAC and SWG, they reviewed the suggested changes, and many of the changes were � incorporated into the Concept Plan. Gretchen Buehner, 13249 SW 136th Place, Tigard OR, Ms. Buhner stated she was not ` � representing the City of Tigard, but was a lawyer representing a client. The property owner she represented was actually outside the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). She was not sure why the property was left out of Area 64, as the parcel of land would have been a great addition to Area 64 for transportation reasons. A private road on�the parcel would work extremely well as a connector and it could serve as an alternate route for traffic on Roy Rogers Road. Ron Bunch, Community Development Director, City of Tigard, Mr. Bunch stated his appreciation for all the hard work staff had dane for WBM. The City of Tigard had been actively following the process for the last three years. The issue the City of Tigard saw with the Concept Plan was the lack of information regarding governance. This issue came up time and time again through out the process and the Concept Plan does not address governance. The City of Tigard believed the Concept Plan should be sent back to address the governance issues and to be complaint with Metro and�State laws. The�e was a brief discussion regarding changing the name Concept Plan to something else and also making it legally binding. Annexation issues were also discussed. The City of Tigard said they were working on annexation issues and annexation was a possibility for WBM. John Weathers, 1fi399 SW Tubes Court, Tigard OR, Mr. Weathers lives next to Area 64. He said two years ago, Washington County had a public involvement opportunity in their neighborhood to discuss the upcoming project for Areas 63 and 64. The neighborhood he lives in became very active in following the process. As the project became more concrete, his neighborhood came up with a five point petition that was submitted to the SWG and�TAC. The five points dealt with additional buffers, traffic concerns, mass transit, where the centers would be located and �park locations. He stated the planning staff did a wonderful job listening to the residents and incorporating some of the changes into the Concept Plan. As the PC was - considering their recommendation, Mr. Weathers asked the commissioners to please keep in mind the Concept Plan before them was what the community wanted. This was a perfect representation of input from the community. The PC deliberated on the R 8�.0. Items discussed included not having enough time to delve into the Concept Plan with one PC meeting and the issue of not having governance and service providers addressed. � � Chair San Soucie summed up the PC deliberations by saying: the PC acknowledged the work memorialized a portion of the work that the County had done with the SWG and TAC to develop components of a plan. He stated that it.should not be called a Concept Plan and detailed text that builds in great flexibility should be used. It should also be stated somewhere in the text that is the document is not a legally binding. Commissioner Hirst made a motion to have the summary serve as the PC recommendation to the BCC, Commissioner Garcia seconded. � . . � Planning Commission Minutes � November 3, 2010 � Page 5 , Commissioner Larrabee presented an amendment to the motion that included a recommendation that parks and roads be flexible and explore the option to have the main commercial area have direct frontage on Roy Rogers. He wanted it to be assured that the property owners would be equitably compensated for their lands. Vote on amendment: 5 -2, Commissioners Manseau and San Soucie voted no. Chair San Soucie read the amended motion: The PC acknowledged the work memorialized a portion of the work that the County had done with the SWG and TAC to develop components of a plan. He continued that it should not be called a Concept Plan and it should go into more detail with text that builds in great flexibility. It should also be stated that it is not a legally binding document somewhere in the text as well as, ensuring that the property owners get equitable compensation for their property. The PC also recommended that commercial area be explored to allow direct frontage to Roy Rogers Road and that the Parks and Roads system be more flexible. Vote on amended motion: 6 - 1, Commissioner Manseau voted no. VII. ADJOURN: 3:59 P.M. There being no further business to come before the Planning Commission, the meeting was adjourned. ;, r � Marc San Soucie n rew Sing la � Chairman, Washington County Secretary, Wa ington County Planning Commission � . Planning Commission � Minutes approved this�_day of �,'tLG�-�► , 2010 , Submitted by Gretchen Olson . S:IPLNG\WPSHAREIPIanning Commission�201012010 Minutes\11032010DraftMinutes.doc MINUTES WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS NOVEMBER 23, 2010 CONVENED: 6:33 p.m. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS: Chairman Tom Brian (participated by telephone) Vice Chair Desari Strader Commissioner Dick Schouten Commissioner Roy Rogers Commissioner Andy Duyck STAFF: Robert Davis, County Administrator Paul Hathaway, Sr. Assistant County Counsel Andrew Singelakis, Director, LUT Brent Curtis, Planning Division Manager, LUT Joanne Rice, Principal Planner, LUT Paul Schaefer, Senior Planner, LUT Mike Dahlstrom, Program Educator, LUT Greg Miller, County Engineer, LUT Traci Shirley, Planning Assistant, LUT Chuck Schable, Audiovisual Technician Barbara Hejtmanek, Recording Secretary PRESS: Dana Tims, The Oregonian APPROVAL OF MINUTES: November 2, 2010 1. CONSENT AGENDA The Board moved item l.i. from the Consent to the Regular Agenda. It was moved to adopt the Consent Agenda, as modified. Motion— Rogers 2"d_DuyCk Vote — 5-0 CLEAN WATER SERVICES l.a. CWS MO 10-91 Award a Two-Year Contract to OLIN Corporation for the Purchase of Sodium Hypochlorite (Approved Under Consent Agenda) l.b. CWS MO 10-92 Award a Two-year Contract to Thatcher Company of Montana, Inc. for the Purchase of Sodium Bisulfite (Approved Under Consent Agenda) l.c. CWS MO 10-93 Approve Fifth Amendment to Master Contract for Professional Services with Brown and Caldwell, Inc. for the Rock Creek Facility Stormwater Improvements Project No. 6392 (CPO 9) (Approved Under Consent Agenda) l.d. CWS MO 10-94 Approve a 36-Month Contract with Polydyne Inc. for the Purchase of Polymers and a Back-Up Contract with BASF Corporation (Approved Under Consent Agenda) l.e. CWS MO 10-95 Approve Second Modification to Third Amendment to Master Contract with Stoel Rives, LLP for Legal Representation on the Contractors, Inc. Claim Involving the Durham Phase IV Project (Approved Under Consent Agenda) l.f. CWS MO 10-96 Accept Construction of the Lower Tualatin Pump Station Project No. 6187 as Complete and Authorize Release of the Retainage Bond (Approved Under Consent Agenda) LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION l.g. MO 10-363 Approve Agreement with Beaverton for Transfer of Jurisdiction of a Section of 160cn Avenue (Baseline Road to Jay Street) (CPO 6 & 7) (Approved Under Consent Agenda) l.h. RO 10-106 Adopt U.S. 26: Glencoe Road Interchange Area Management Plan as Part of the Technical Appendix of the 2020 Transportation Plan (CPO 8) (Approved Under Consent Agenda) BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS l.i. MO 10-354 Establish December Board of Commissioners Meeting Schedule (All CPOs) (Moved From Consent to Regular Agenda) COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE l.j. MO 10-355 Authorize Omnibus International Agreement with Several Oregon Counties for Disaster- Related Emergency Assistance (Approved Under Consent Agenda) HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES l.k. MO 10-356 Approve Agreement with Tigard-Tualatin School District and Authorize Contract to Provide Services (Approved Under Consent Agenda) 1.1. MO 10-357 Grant Waiver From Request for Proposals Process and Approve Contracts to Provide Adult Mental Health Services (Approved Under Consent Agenda) l.m. MO 10-358 Award Contract with CODA to Provide Outpatient Drug Court Substance Abuse Treatment Services for Adults and Families (Approved Under Consent Agenda) JUVENILE DEPARTMENT l.n. MO 10-359 Authorize Grant Funding and Agreement with the State of Oregon for Juvenile Drug Court (Approved Under Consent Agenda) SHERIFF'S OFFICE l.o. MO 10-360 Authorize Acceptance of Emergency Management Performance Grant (Approved Under Consent Agenda) SUPPORT SERVICES l.p. MO 10-361 Accept Bid/Award Contract for Boiler and Chiller Replacement—ARRA Project (Approved Under Consent Agenda) l.q. MO 10-362 Award Contract/Environmental Engineering Consulting Services (Approved Under Consent Agenda) SERVICE DISTRICT FOR LIGHTING NO. 1-A COUNTY SERVICE DISTRICT l.r. SDL RO 10-7 Form Assessment Area, Authorize Maximum Annual Assessment and Impose a First Year Assessment for Washington Gardens Memory Care (CPO 4M) (Approved Under Consent Agenda) 2. ORAL COMMUNICATION (2 MINUTE OPPORTUNITY) Fran Bates, 14880 NW Ridgetop Court, Beaverton, Oregon, stated that former Commissioner John Leeper has said that he was told (when on the Board) that there was adequate right-of-way along Bethany Boulevard to make a five-lane road without having to condemn or acquire any property. He said that this evidently is inaccurate because current plans call for taking up to 30 properties or parts thereof to make this road happen. Mr. Bates then showed the Board a PowerPoint that depicted properties and how far back the right-of-way goes in various yards. Commissioner Duyck clarified that there is no current plan. He assumed that Mr. Bates' photographs show the maximum with the five lane scenario. Mr. Bates replied that three of the four options require taking the house depicted on one of the slides. Commissioner Schouten asked if all that is being shown will be taken. Mr. Bates responded in the affirmative, assuming that they have to take the right-of-way from the east side of the road. Vice Chair Strader asked if these pictures assume that there will be five lanes. Mr. Bates said that this assumes that three of the four options are implemented. Eudora Goganian, age 11, 2720 NW Forest Avenue, stated that children are glad that Bethany Boulevard will be improved but worry about the five lanes because it puts the needs of cars before the needs of people. She said that children need to cross Bethany Boulevard to get to school and friends' houses. Ms. Goganian stated that a crosswalk with signal would be great but maintained that five lanes are not safe. She remarked that three lanes are easier and present a shorter distance to cross. Ms. Goganian said that three lanes would allow children to ride bikes and walk to school safely. Ms. Goganian stated that constructing five lanes would take land from peoples' homes and back yards would be destroyed. She was accompanied by a friend, Sydney, whose grandparents would lose grass, trees and the yard where she plays if the five lanes are built. Ms. Goganian loves trees and said that building five lanes would destroy lots of large trees and replace them with noise and pollution. She did not think it is fair to harm the lives and property of people who live in older, great neighborhoods. Ms. Goganian said that it does not make sense to take away from peoples' back yards to help neighborhoods that do not exist yet and to help cars get to the freeway one or two minutes faster. She favored using the money that would have been spent on land for the five lanes on planting more trees with the three-lane plan. Ms. Goganian reported that her Mom will not let her ride her bike on a five lane road with painted bike lanes. She suggested that with three lanes, trees could be planted between the bike lanes and the rest of the road—separating bikes, sidewalks and cars. Ms. Goganian said that people could then do errands without even having to drive. She stated that she could walk with her Grandmother and Grandfather to restaurants on a safe three-lane road. Ms. Goganian concluded that five lanes are great for cars but not people. She questioned whether cars or people should come first. Ms. Goganian said that this is a chance to make a place better for people. She submitted testimony, which may be found in the Meeting File. Audience applause was given to the speaker. Vice Chair Strader said that she would not let her 4-year-old daughter ride her bike on that segment of Bethany Boulevard now due to current public safety issues. She agreed that there needs to be pedestrian/bike/car safety for all who travel the entirety of Bethany Boulevard. Vice Chair Strader shared that she, too, likes trees. Darla Castagno, 15175 NW Perimeter Drive, Beaverton, Oregon, submitted written testimony, which may be found in the Meeting File. She said that she has lived in Oak Hills for 40 years. Ms. Castagno invited the Board to tour Oak Hills in order to come to the understanding that this is not a typical subdivision but rather a totally planned community. She indicated that her submittal is from the State Historic Preservation Office regarding the National Register eligibility for Oak Hills. Ms. Castagno indicated that her phone number is at the bottom of the page so that Board members can call her to schedule a tour. 3. LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION 3.a. RO 10-105 Consider the Recommended West Bull Mountain Concept Plan (CPO 4B, 4K) Joanne Rice stated that the purpose of the proposed Resolution and Order for West Bull Mountain is to adopt and memorialize the general land use and transportation framework for Area 63 and 64. She reviewed that both of those areas were added to the Urban Growth Boundary in 2002. Ms. Rice said that the Resolution and Order completes Phase I of the West Bull Mountain work plan and that the second phase to come is development of the Community Plan, its implementing regulations and the funding strategy. She stated that part of that work will include identifying who will be the long-term water and parks provider and remarked that a great deal of work remains to be done. Ms. Rice said that there will also be a great deal of additional transportation analysis that needs to be done to determine which improvements are funded. She noted that in part of the concept plan documents, there is a list of the top ten needed improvements; she added that staff also acknowledges that there needs to be a full analysis of the other identified improvements to determine which actually get funded in the funding strategy. Ms. Rice informed the Board that this is a generalized concept plan and is not intended to ensure complete compliance with Metro's functional plan and all of the statewide planning goals; this is the generalized framework for the land use and transportation components. She clarified that the detailed level of findings and compliance will be made when the community plan is done in the next phase. Ms. Rice stated that the Resolution and Order has been written in a way to make it very clear that this is not a legally binding document but rather is intended to guide the next phase of development. She said that relative to the maps and implementing strategies, there is a great deal of flexibility that needs to be provided in implementing the next stage—particularly with regard to parks and roads. Ms. Rice stated that, for example, once a parks provider is identified, a parks master plan will have to be developed and this will provide more specificity in terms of where parks are located. Ms. Rice reported that changes have been made to the document since the Planning Commission hearing, such as to: • Note all of the parks in a hash pattern to indicate that those are not fixed locations • Note that implementation of the three maps (transportation, land use, and parks) is subject to all of the implementing strategies. Information in the implementing strategies calls for further refinement of roads and parks with additional engineering. Quite a bit of work will still be done in the next phase. Ms. Rice acknowledged receipt of one additional letter since the Board received its packet from John Botaitis, who is unable to be here tonight due to the weather. She summarized his letter, which may be found in the Meeting File. • Mr. Botaitis lives in Meyers Farm. 161 S` Avenue goes through that development and connects into Area 63. That is a street that will be extended down into the area. Part of the concept plan includes draft language directing additional engineering in terms of how to deal with traffic control issues. There is still more to come on that issue. Ms. Rice said that with respect to the next phase of work, staff has proposed that the County's role in that work be sorted out in the 201 l work program for the Long Range Planning Division. Commissioner Schouten observed that the letter from John Botaitis talks about a petition, which is not attached. Paul Schaefer responded that several letters were submitted in the May timeframe to committees to address concerns of the road connections and density. He clarified that it was not a formal petition with a lot of signatures but rather there were several letters. Mr. Schaefer explained that Mr. Botaitis' letter is a summary of those concerns with traffic and density. Commissioner Schouten recalled reading that the density proposed in this concept plan is just a little bit over the minimums required by Metro by just a couple of households per acre. Joanne Rice said that this is correct. However, she stated that in Area 63, the actual density is affected by the steeper slopes there. Ms. Rice said that this has a density of just under eight units an acre. She stated that whcn you get into the flatter lands of Area 64, you pick up a little more density, which gives you an overall density range of a little more than 10 units per acre for both. Ms. Rice explained that part of what the concept plan does in response to concerns raised by residents is much low density residential is provided all along the existing single family development in Bull Mountain. She said that some of the area directly south of Meyers Farm is some of the steeper slope area. Ms. Rice stated that once the community plan is done, you could be looking at densities that might even be less than the six units an acre of Meyers Farm. She reviewed that that is one of the things that the concept plan calls for, namely, to look at these steeper slope areas that possibly come in at lower densities than are currently in the area. Commissioner Schouten stated that these are average figures. He said he has seen on the maps that slightly higher densities are away from established neighborhoods. Joanne Rice affirmed that this is correct. The public hearing was opened. Liz Newton, Assistant City Manager, City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon, told the Board that Mayor Dirksen would have liked to be here this evening but he is convening Tigard City Council tonight. She submitted a letter and a red-lined Resolution and Order, both of which may be found in the Meeting File. Ms. Newton stated that the City of Tigard participated on the West Bull Mountain concept plan TAC and has commented to staff throughout this process. She said that a lot of issues that Tigard has raised concerns about have been addressed. Ms. Newton was not sure if the Board saw the letter which the City of Tigard submitted to the Planning Commission. She related that some of Tigard's concerns are around issues such as water, parks, traffic and governance—who will provide those services and funding for those services. Ms. Newton now understood that that will be addressed in Phase II. She stated that Tigard, along with the City of Beaverton, has raised issues throughout the process as to whether the plan is in compliance with Metro codes and statewide planning goals as a concept plan. Ms. Newton reported that the two issues that Tigard was really concerned about were that those goals and requirements are met and also what the future expectations of the public are around a concept plan. She recalled that the Planning Commission recommended that the concept plan not be called a concept plan and that it clearly state that it is not legally binding. Ms. Newton stated that the City of Tigard prepared a draft, red-lined version of the Resolution and Order that would suggest that the concept plan name be changed to the Urban Growth Plan Diagram, which was one of the terms used by County staff to help describe how the document actually would be served. She referenced page 7 of the October 20, 2010 concept plan report and took exception to the statement that"A process was created by the County and the consultant team to develop the Community Plan. This plan is being crafted in two phases: Phase I (West Bull Mountain Concept Plan) and Phase II (Community Plan and implementing ordinances, including a finance plan developing both a land use plan and a funding plan) concurrently represent a new approach to planning for future urban development in unincorporated Washington County". Ms. Newton said that the phrase "for future urban development in unincorporated Washington County" seems contrary to Tigard with what was confirmed in the urban reserves process about the city's role in providing services to those areas. She recommended that that be fleshed out as we move forward. Ms. Newton referenced page 14 under the Title XI requirements, where the report states "Title references are in italics. Type I plan annexation to appropriate service provider districts for required urban services." She stated that Tigard believes it should read "Pursuant to 2007 Title XI document is provision for annexation to the district and to a city or any necessary service district to provide all required services." Commissioner Rogers thanked Liz Newton for attending this afternoon's Workesssion and tonight's Board Meeting. He shared that he had some concerns about how concrete these concepts were and was all for slowing the process down and trying to get some resolution among the various parties. Commissioner Rogers said that based upon the way it is funded through Metro and based upon the Board having to pass some kind of Resolution and understanding that this is a very preliminary concept plan that can be amended, he is now comfortable with it. He liked what Ms. Newton said tonight but noted that it is hard to modify things at the eleventh hour. Commissioner Rogers hoped that Tigard would continue to participate in Phase II and that some things can then be corrected. Ms. Newton thanked Commissioner Rogers. She reiterated that the letter to the Planning Commission provides a little more specificity about Tigard's concerns as we move forward. Commissioner Schouten assumed that staff will respond to comments made by the City of Tigard. He hoped that the Resolution and Order can specify that it is not a legally binding document and perhaps include some of the other suggested language. Joanne Rice replied that on advice of Counsel, the attachments to the Resolution and Order do make clear that the R&O is not legally binding. She added that Counsel recommended that that not be stated in the Resolution and Order itself. Ms. Rice said that relative to the term "document concept plan", because that has been used throughout the planning process, staff decided not to rename it as the Planning Commission recommended. She stated that staff made clear in the attached materials that it is a concept plan and explained that there is further work to be done. Ms. Rice said that some of the statements referenced in the report with regard to the level of planning that the County is doing being above and beyond does not intend to say that this is the level of planning that the County will do in future urban reserves areas. She noted that the Board has made this clear through the Urbanization Forum. Ms. Rice clarified that that statement intends to refer only to Area 63 and 64 as well as North Bethany. She said that the service district reference is to Clean Water Services and Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue—indicating that they need to be annexed there. Ms. Rice stated that in terms of who is going to be the ultimate service provider for water and parks, it may be the City of Tigard, and if that is the case, that is the direction that we will take in Phase II of the implementation. John Rankin, Attorney at Law, 26715 SW Baker Road, Sherwood, Oregon, represented eight property owners. (Letter from Mr. Rankin may be found in the Meeting File.) He represented approximately 100 acres of land inside Area 63—nearly half of the area in Area 63. Mr. Rankin has been involved since near the beginning of the process and has submitted all kinds of iterations of plans because staff allegedly was not creating plans. He said that every time there was some discussion at TAC and SWG, he felt it was important to try to distill it into a drawing. Mr. Rankin stated that a map he submitted is in the Planning Commission packet which is the final Neighbors of West Bull Mountain alternative concept plan. He said that this was developed over a long period of time and with a lot of cooperation—particularly in the last half of the process from County staff. Mr. Rankin thanked Paul Schaefer, both Steve Kelleys, and Greg Miller for listening carefully to what he presented and for the work they did to try to implement that. He encouraged the Board to encourage staff to get out on the ground every time they go through a process like this. Mr. Rankin believed that when staff finally did this, they began to pick up some of his suggestions and concepts. He asked the Board to look at the suggestions in his letter before approving the Resolution and Order tonight. Mr. Rankin emphasized that flexibility is a big issue for his clients: flexibility as it relates to transportation and to location of parks. He said that when you do a concept plan, it begins to solidify those elements. Mr. Rankin stated that as those elements go forward in a community plan, things get further solidified. He wanted to make sure that there is plenty of flexibility in the process. Mr. Rankin had some ideas that he was not prepared to present tonight but said these will be helpful through the community planning process. He asked that the Board include two more statements in the Resolution and Order: 1. "It appearing to the Board that flexibility, particularly in the location and implementation of transportation and park facilities and areas of special concern, is necessary in implementing the Concept Plan during the community planning stage of the West Bull Mountain Community Planning process; and" Mr. Rankin was now informed that he was out of testimony time. He asked the Board to ensure that flexibility will be part of this process. (Refer to Meeting File for remainder of suggestions.) Vice Chair Strader was not sure where Mr. Rankin stands on this matter. Mr. Rankin replied that he supports this with the caveat that there be flexibility in the transportation and park locations setting. He said that most of what he and his clients have suggested has been adopted. However, Mr. Rankin stated that there are still areas where there are difficulties. Vice Chair Strader's understanding was that this Resolution and Order provides the greatest flexibility that we could possibly have. Joanne Rice affirmed that this is correct. She said that with streets, for example, staff refers to them as preferred route locations and that alignments would need to be changed to respond to environmental, topographical and geological restraints or additional engineering analysis. Ms. Rice stated that the next phase will deal with what the actual zoning is and staff will look at where property lines are and topographical issues for some of those roads. She believed that enough flexibility is written in such that we do not need to make any adjustments to the Resolution and Order. Ms. Rice stated that several of Mr. Rankin's rccommendations are the types of things that would be addressed in the upcoming work program and not in the Resolution and Order. John Rankin asked Ms. Rice to provide him with notice of the work program when it goes before the Board because he would like to participate in that process. Commissioner Rogers commented that John Rankin's Dad, Howard Rankin, was probably one of the premier bond counsels in the State of Oregon. He spotted three things in John Rankin's letter that have to do with process. Commissioner Rogers asked him to elaborate. Mr. Rankin said that the process was difficult because there was one property owner on the SWG; he could not remember if a property owner was on the TAC. He stated that he and his eight property owners spent thousands of dollars on engineering, planning, re- mapping, etc to show that pretty pictures of curvy or linear roads would not work. Mr. Rankin said that when he tried to present that information to the TAC or SWG, there was too short a time to testify. He went on to say that the times to talk were at the beginning and end of the meeting. Mr. Rankin said speakers would have to anticipate what was going to happen at the beginning of the meeting to present a plan that had significant elements different from the preferred plan. He complained that they got to speak at the end, after a decision had been made. Mr. Rankin wanted public comment to be allowed right after the agenda item is presented, followed by deliberation and the decision. Commissioner Rogers hoped that staff would look at the process to make sure it is very open and that there is the ability to challenge before decisions are made. Vice Chair Strader asked staff about TAC composition. Ms. Rice responded that there were two property owners on the SWG—one from Area 63 and one from Area 64. She said that staff will look at the process used and how adjustments can be made to it. John Weathers, 16399 SW Hoops Court, Tigard, Oregon, submitted a printout of a PowerPoint presentation, which may be found in the Meeting File. He informed the Board that he lives in Scholls Country Estates, which is located right next to Area 64 and is composed of approximately 152 families. Mr. Weathers said that after Planning staff told the neighborhood what was going on, neighbors put together a petition that 126 families signed. He stated that this petition led to key changes to the concept plan. Mr. Weathers focused on the community park, which the preferred plan wished to place west of Roy Rogers Road. He reported that after talking with the neighborhood, staff moved the park to a different location. Mr. Weathers wanted the plan to contain flexibility. He believed that the concept plan, as drafted, is clear that there is plenty of flexibility to move park locations. Mr. Weathers referenced a letter from Perkins Coie on behalf of West Hills, asking to change the wording from"limited adjustments" to "reasonable adjustments". He was perplexed by this proposed change and not sure what problem it is trying to solve. Mr. Weathers was aware that the community park is on West Hills property and that West Hills voted against this location as a SWG member. He thought that the park is where it should be. Mr. Weathers favored changing location of parks for only the right reasons. He did not want compromises to result in another Bull Mountain development that does not have an adequate park system or park. Steve McCracken, 16412 SW Luke Lane, Tigard, Oregon, said that his family has lived here for over 16 years. His concern regarding Luke Lane is that it not be a preferred pass through street as part of this proposal. Mr. McCracken said that he has little sympathy for people who move into a neighborhood containing an airport and then complain about the noise. Alternately, he has tremendous sympathy for people who move to quiet neighborhoods and then jurisdictions change the quietness and cul-de-sac features of the neighborhood. Mr. McCracken said that he moved from another cul-de-sac to Luke Lane, expecting that it would remain the same while his family lived there. He stated that every feature of Luke Lane suggests that it is a cul-de-sac but the plan is to punch through that street to access this new area. Mr. McCracken said that certain roads in Scholls Country Estates are pending pass-through but they are straight. He stated that his street has never had a sign indicating that it was pending pass-through. Mr. McCracken requested that the Board drive to Luke Lane to see that it is a serene quiet neighborhood and that residents want to keep it that way. It was moved to adopt the concept plan and to authorize the Chair to sign the Resolution and Order to memorialize the action. Motion—Rogers 2"d_Brian Vote—5-0 Commissioner Rogers came to tonight's meeting really wanting to hear testimony because he was on the fence as to whether or not to move forward with this item. Based upon the Worksession discussion and testimony tonight, he was prepared to move forward. Chairman Brian expressed appreciation for all of the comments offered tonight by the residents and property owners in the area. He noted that a concern was expressed about how things tend to solidify over time and get very difficult to change. In general, Chairman Brian agreed with that from his experience. However, he said that when you look at the larger context of how we have operated in North Bethany after the concept was adopted, there have been a number of changes to the plan. Chairman Brian stated that when you get into the details of the infrastructure; the size, scope and location; the financing and who is responsible—these things move around. He underscored the staff report in that the concept plan is a concept and is further subject to a lot of work and a lot of citizen/owner participation. Chairman Brian thought flexibility is good and pointed out that it must be based upon reasonable findings rather than whims. He recalled that this is similar to where we were a year ago with North Bethany and defines what the work is from hcre on out. Chairman Brian disagreed with the idea of calling it a diagram because after thousands of dollars and two to three years of work, this is not just a diagram. He observed that there are volumes of data, research, findings and analysis that have gotten us this far. Chairman Brian recognized that it is not perfect or final but reiterated that it would be demeaning to the process to call it a diagram when everyone thought they were working on a concept. He supported leaving it as a concept plan, with various references in the report and record as to its non-binding nature. Commissioner Rogers, too, appreciated the testimony tonight. He emphasized that this is a concept plan that we can change. Commissioner Rogers said that we need to do some work with Tigard and Beaverton to make certain that we understand their concerns and implement as many of those as we can. He stated that it is important to make sure that our process is very transparent and allows anyone to participate/testify. Commissioner Rogers found it compelling that we do not move the park around like an afterthought when we have thoughtfully sited it. He was not certain we can always not go down somebody's street to open up new areas but favored taking a look at that situation. Commissioner Rogers said that if there are other avenues to access these new areas without going through what appears to be a cul-de-sac,that makes sense. He was not saying we can do that but wanted to be open to that possibility. Commissioner Rogers thanked all of the people who participated in this long process. He noted that the Board has had both Bethany and Bull Mountain to work on and said that these were only a piece of this year's work plan. Commissioner Rogers hoped everyone would continue to participate as we go into Phase II. Commissioner Schouten wanted to hear from staff now. Joanne Rice informed the Board that relative to Luke Lane and the connections into the neighborhood to the east, access to Scholls Ferry Road has been proposed as a way to ensure that there will not be a lot of cut-through traffic going through that area. She sympathized with Mr. McCracken because the street was built as a cul-de-sac but on paper when it was designed, it was to go through. Ms. Rice said that this is something that staff will have to look at very carefully. She stated that as part of the work program for the work that is coming up, staff will take to heart all of the comments that have been made—particularly about the public involvement process. Ms. Rice said that staff will package all this information so that it is readily available to everyone so that when the next phase of work happens, all this work will be there as well as the record from this hearing to indicate the testimony that was provided and also comments from the Board. Commissioner Schouten recognized that people who live in existing neighborhoods have very specific concerns and appreciated them. He said that we are at a very preliminary stage at this point. In terms of cul-de-sacs, Commissioner Schouten commented that we have been getting away from those and do not want to build any more of them. He stated that in some circumstances, we may want to eliminate some of them because they make it very difficult for people to be able to access places. Commissioner Schouten pointed out that not everyone will be driving and cul-de-sacs make it much more difficult to get to places on foot or on bike. He said that cul-de-sacs have caused situations where people have to drive a half mile to get a few hundred yards to some other point. Commissioner Schouten stated that regarding mass transit,there are a lot of parts of the county where we would like to see better bus service because not everybody can afford to own a car, not everyone is old enough to drive a car, and some seniors cannot drive a car. He spoke of the need for transit in our county and added that the county is actually underserved. Commissioner Schouten said that it is fairly doubtful that there will be any kind of transit in this neighborhood because there are a lot of other places with a pressing need but he did not want to preclude that at some point in time there could be bus service in this area. He understood that people living in existing neighborhoods have very specific needs and those will have to be addressed over time as we get into greater detail going beyond the concept plan. Chairman Brian stated that things have changed regionally over the last 10 or 20 years. He said that topics have been exhaustively discussed with lots of citizen participation discussions about what we want this region to look like over the next several decades. Chairman Brian stated that there is a general agreement that we have to use the land that is inside the Urban Growth Boundary to get more performance and density out of it. He explained that we have to be sure that as we receive our growth, it does not push or force sprawl out into the farm and forest land. Chairman Brian said that those who have been on the Board for many years have seen many fields developed. He noted that it is not just the developers but governmental policies to get better land use performance out of our land to accommodate the growth without sprawling into farm and forest areas. Chairman Brian said that it is always difficult when people face increased density, which is what happens when you live close in to an urban area. He stated that it is difficult but is the reality; he did not think it is going away as a regional policy. Vice Chair Strader agreed with the Chairman's comments regarding the similarities to North Bethany. However, her caveat is that North Bethany did not have nearly the options that Bull Mountain has. Having worked on North Bethany for the past five years, Vice Chair Strader would not wish a development on any of her colleagues in the region. She recognized that it is a very difficult process in this region to develop any kind of neighborhood because those people who have supported you for years feel that you should be with them, even when you have to make very tough decisions under very different criteria than those who live in the neighborhoods would have for themselves. Vice Chair Strader stated that for elected officials who develop healthy and sustainable neighborhoods, criteria are public safety, how to finance, how to develop a complete community with parks, good schools, access to transportation, public transportation, etc. She did not blame people who tell the Board that they do not want development in their neighborhoods. Vice Chair Strader grew up in Hillsboro when its population was less than 10,000 and would love to go back to those days. However, she pointed out that those days are long gone. Vice Chair Strader clarified that this does not mean that she does not love what Hillsboro has become because it is a wonderful, vibrant community that has kept its agricultural community. She foresaw a lot of change on the horizon: she did not think North Bethany is done and Bull Mountain is a long way from being done. Vice Chair Strader said that it will take a lot of heavy lifting from community members and an understanding that this is not personal but rather that this is very much how public policy is developed. She acknowledged that it is very messy but felt that as long as we keep it aboveboard and not so personalized, we can do what we did in North Bethany, namely, create another really good community in Bull Mountain. Vice Chair Strader, who will leave the Board in January, wished her colleagues well in both of those neighborhoods because they are very important to the future of Washington County. 3.b. RO 10-107 Approve Policy for Mid-Block Pedestrian and Trail Crossings (All CPOs) Greg Miller stated that the purpose of this policy is to adopt a procedure to allow new pedestrian crossings to be established at mid-block locations in uncontrolled intersections on roads under county jurisdiction based upon an engineering study by the applicant and review and approval by the County Fngineer. He said that in the past, Washington County has approved pedestrian crossings only at road intersections with few exceptions. Mr. Miller explained that this was based on the belief that this was the only safe and practical system for drivers and pedestrians. He said that now, conditions and public attitudes are changing: new trails are being planned in many locations and pedestrian and bicycle facilities (including those trails) are essential to provide multi-modal access and mobility within a transportation system. Mr. Miller stated that ideally, pedestrian and trail crossings would occur at road intersections having traffic signals so that road crossings could be made safely with minimal additional improvements. He recognized that many proposed trail crossings are in the middle of blocks between road intersections and significant crossing improvements may be needed for adequate safety. Mr. Miller said that many existing roads have been designed primarily for vehicle movement and parallel pedestrian travel but not for substantial pedestrian crossings apart from road intersections. He stated that as a result, some of these new pedestrian crossings will require major capital improvements, given road width, hi�h speeds and large volumes of traffic. Mr. Miller remarked that each one is unique. Mr. Miller said that this policy authorizes the County Engineer to approve a modification or design exception under County Code Chapter 15.08 for the crossing, which would allow it to be constructed through an appropriate permit. He stated that this procedure attempts to balance the needs of vehicles and pedestrian travel to allow new crossings to be established where all listed factors bearing on the safety of the crossing have been analyzed and where the crossing incorporates all reasonable, practicable and appropriate safety provisions. Mr. Miller summarized that safety is number one. Commissioner Schouten acknowledged receipt of letters, such as from Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation District, and that staff made additional revisions. He asked staff to elaborate on these. Greg Miller indicated that there were two significant changes: • One paragraph requires that if a crossing is proposed within 300 feet of a controlled intersection, the trail users would have to be diverted to the road intersection and use the signals there to cross the street. THPRD said we needed to be a little bit more flexible about that rather than an absolute prohibition. We added language where if the County Engineer decided that that crossing was not appropriate where proposed and needed to go to the nearest intersection, then the applicant could come back in with further information. There would be a discussion and they could attempt to change the County Engineer's mind. Failing that, they could propose a grade crossing, which is much more expensive but also safe. • The other significant change is in the last paragraph, where it talked about the possibility of an applicant wanting to appeal the decision of the County Engineer. First step would be to discuss things with the County Engineer and attempt to reach a negotiated agreement. If that failed, they would use the policy that is in County Code Chapter 15.08, which is part of the road standards to appeal a design exception to the road standards. Chairman Brian asked who, typically, would be the applicant. He wondered if it would be the city, the park district, or some other entity. Mr. Miller responded that it could be any. He said that most of the road crossings identified so far are THPRD trails but he added that there are a couple of real significant ones that will belong to the City of Hillsboro. Mr. Miller suspected that other cities, as they develop their local community trails, will have similar issues and requests. Chairman Brian asked if private parties or private non-profits would be able to initiate the review also. Mr. Miller replied that anyone could initiate the application. It was moved to approve the revised Washington County Mid-Block Pedestrian Crossing Approval Process. Motion—Rogers 2"a_ Schouten Vote— 5-0 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS MO 10-354 Establish December Board of Commissioners Meeting Schedule This item was removed from the Consent Agenda and is now taken up for consideration. Commissioner Duyck proposed that the December 21, 2010 meeting—which was recommended to be cancelled—be changed to "pending". He explained that the Board does not know what is going to happen with any action that may need to be taken regarding reserves. Commissioner Duyck said that if the Board needs to do something before the end of the year, he would like to have maximum flexibility to do that. He indicated that there will be revised wording in the agenda item, as follows: December 7, 2010: 8:30 a.m. Worksession; 10:00 a.m. Board Meeting December 14, 2010: 4:00 p.m. Worksession; 6:30 p.m. Board Meeting December 21, 2010: Reserved as needed. December 28, 2010: Cancelled. Commissioner Duyck reiterated that this is for maximum flexibility and does not necessarily mean that we will have a meeting. He said that this keeps the option open. Chairman Brian stated that this could even be a telephonic meeting. It was moved to approve the proposed changes to the December Board of Commissioners meeting schedule. Motion–Duyck 2nd_Rogers Vote–5-0 4. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (5 MINUTE OPPORTUNITI� None. 5. BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS Chairman Brian wished everyone a happy and safe Thanksgiving. Vice Chair Strader sent "Happy Thanksgiving" wishes to everyone in Washington County and the State of Oregon. Commissioner Schouten echoed the Thanksgiving wishes and reminded everyone that there will be no Board Meeting next Tuesday since it is a fifth Tuesday. 6. ADJOURNMENT: 7:55 p.m. Motion—Rogers 2"a_ Schouten Vote—5-0 MINUTES APPROVED THIS DAY 2010 RECORDING SECRETARY CHAIRMAN CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CIT'Y COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 12- AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 2012-00002 TO AMEND THE TIGARD COMI'REHENSIVE PLAN MAP TO INCLUDE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS FOR THE RNER TERRACE COMMUNITY PLAN A.REA BASED ON RECOMMENDED LAND USES FOUND IN WASHINGTON COUNTY'S WEST BULL MT. CONCEPT PLAN AND AMEND THE CURRENT TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN GOAL 14: URBANIZATION POLICIES. WHEREAS, Washington County Board of Commissioners adopted by Resolution and Order the West Bull Mt. Concept Plan; and WHEREAS, the city of Tigard signed an intergovernmental agreement with Washington County to refine the concept plan into the River Terrace Community Plan; and WHEREAS, the River Terrace Community Plan will put into place a means to implement the vision of the concept plan through zoning, development code regulations and other measures that will make urban development possible; and WHEREAS, the city of Tigard was a��arded grant monies as part of the intergovernmental agreement and the proposed amendment will allow access to funds; and WHFREAS, the city has proposed an amendment to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map to include land use designations for the River Terrace Community Plan area based on recommended land uses in the concept plan; and WHEREAS, the city has proposed an amendment to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan by updaring policies corresponding to Statewide Planning Goal 14; and WHEREAS, the Tigard Planning Commission held a public hearing, which was noticed in accordance with city standards, on December 3, 2012, and recommended approval of the proposed CPA 2012-00002 by motion and with vote in support; and WHEREAS, on December 11, 2012, the Tigard City Council held a public hearing, which was noticed in accordance with ciry standards, to consider the Coininission's recommendarion on CPA 2012-00002, hear public testimony, and apply applicable decision-making criteria; and WHEREAS, on December 11, 2012, the Tigard City Council adopted CPA 2012-00002 pursuant to the public hearing and its deliberations; and ORDINANCE No. 12- Page 1 WHEREAS, Council's decision to adopt CPA 2012-00002 was based on the findings and conclusions found in Exhibit "C" and the associated land use record which is incorporated herein by reference and is contained in land use file CPA 2012-00002. NOW,THEREFORE,THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Tigard City Council amends the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map to include land use designarions for the River Terrace Community Plan area as shown in Exhibit "A". SECTION 2: Tigard Ciry Council amends Tigard Comprehensive Plan to include new text as shown in Exhibit "B". SECTION 3: Tigard City Council adopts the findings and conclusions contained in Exhibit "C" in support of the Council's action and to be the legislative basis for this ordinance. SECTION 4: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, signature by the Mayor, and posting by the City Recorder. PASSED: By vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this day of , 2012. Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder �PPROVED: By Tigard Ciry Council this day of , 2012. Craig Dirksen, Mayor Approved as to form: City Attorney ORDINANCE No. 12- Page 2 I/��II.�.��.i�.0�`�.��1_ 1 �/ � • • / • t ' . � ' � . • TIGARD � ' ' " „ � e � - _%/�� .. --_� ' �i / � ��G �� '� �� 1�11 - o�V\� �� / �" �, ♦�•.�� ♦1 • n�?��: . ��y�T ' � �� i �i�� iii ii _=nii� � ��-=�� - ��i• � �, � � � �■ . 1�� ! �� mmn �uuw� n��n _ :�`II;;�� . ��nuuu�U ��Iluri i ° M►��■�uq�01 %i111111 . ' .•. -. �-. . . . _ � 1/p 11111�11 �11111111�• / ►��I��1��1� �IIIIIII • . • • • ' , �� 1111 �M� �%III��G► • �- ��►��1111111►��111111 ��1111111 p� It11111! -• �- ■■��/��p �D/1111111 . - - ■ ��IIIIII �%111111111�1 • �- � �uuum��u:�mm�uu�i�� i f��'111111�� 111111 C�� - • �• •�• • - '��jj j i_��IIIO��11�� ■��:1 ...,��% `�� ••- •. - �II C��`p�� ' �:� � � i r ..■-.�� 1�� - • • �Illlll;riiir��'. � � - i��11��, ,� � • � - I .,L;��'w��I� � I �� ,, ■ � � .. . :. .. �I I `, �� ■�►��= .. . :. .. ; � �iii��i►�I� . . :. .. ' i ��■ ■�G:1:11� . , ;� . _�,,,,,,,.�,��, � ,, �i, ..- �� _ �� mum�m.��,/,yi ( � �� unuuuu�� ..��.�� p f !y ■� ir n�umuunu■ ■ '` y � ��u� ummuu� � � 4/uuu m.■.■■.■.'� �111E -- a� � C �np al■�� !! /N■��■ iiiD : ��I ��` • -��: ��);■■■■■■::�\��1/ ��■� II mm�►I��III►� ll� �ii.�:::iii■ ��•• �l��l•;�.��■� ..... .� ,-....., r ....►�1.1��...r..■...�.��..� �►►.�':� � � � ----� i� � � ■I � � Illilr�� . i .. �. , 1��■'�/3►� / r ' . I, � � ,� ��, � �, I� 7 _ - �: ° _ ! ��1��!�. /% � � ' ��ir�� :�. - -- �, ��..�....�.....=== ..►� �:;�� C::�:� � �� Ill�i;�.r� ��. � ■■��.�� :��O��r=\i'��:�:�, � i�llllll►�� ♦ �� \ � ��► 1111111!�• �� :�`: ..��n . 111� .■■ •.�i��■■■� , ��' �T� �q�� ==�� Illlii��■■��■ u■. j ��mmn�`�� r .! � �� ■ � „ Ciry of Tigard �.�"�. CPA2012-00002 ��,�� Proposed Tigard Comprehensive Plan Text Changes � ��' ��r�:�.: The City of Tigard proposes to amend the Goal 14: Urbanization chapter of its comprehensive plan to include the policies below. The policies will be located under e�sting Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goal 14.3. The policies are intended to provide guidance during the preparation and after adoption of the River Terrace Communiry Plan. 5. Metro brought areas known as Area 63, Area 64 and Roy Rogers West Area within the Urban Growth Boundary. These areas are known as the River Terrace Community Planning area. The City of Tigard shall be the designated service provider for the area. 6. 1'he City shall prepare and adopt a River Terrace Community Plan for the area. The basis for the River Terrace Community Plan shall be the land use designations from the West Bull Mountain Concept Plan. Refinements to the West Bull Mountain Concept Plan shall be considered during the public planning process for the River Terrace Community Plan. 7. The City shall identify appropriate urban zoning districts and regulations as part of the River Terrace Community Plan,which shall comply with the Statewide Planning Goals and the Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan. 8. The City shall defer land use and zoning decisions within the area to Washington County, as outlined in the Intergovernmental Agreement dated Apri124,2012, until the River Terrace Community Plan is adopted. 9. If all areas are not annexed by the City by the time the River Terrace Community Plan is adopted, the City shall seek an amendment to the Intergovernmental r�greement of April 24, 2012 transferring land use and zoning responsibility for the River Terrace Community Planning area, including unincorporated areas, to the City. 10. Once the River Terrace Community Plan is adopted, and upon annexation to the City, urban zoning districts shall be adopted for these areas. If unincorporated areas remain,rural zoning shall be retained for these areas. 11. The City shall prepare a public facilities plan and an infrastructure financing plan as part of the River Terrace Community Plan. 12. No application of City zoning or development shall be approved by the city witivn the River Terrace Communiry Plan Area until such time as a full analysis under the Transportation Planning Rule ('I'PR) (OAR 660-012-00G0),which shall include a transportarion funding strategy prepared in coordination with Washington Counry, has been completed and approved for the River Terrace Communiry Plan Area by the City. The funding strategy should idenrify transportation improvements proposed to resolve transportation system impacts generated by development of the River Terrace Communiry Area, the responsible party for constructing improvements, their associated cost estimates and public and/or private funding sources,including sources that may be specified by any applicable memoranda of understanding or development agreement. If the funding strategy includes transportation Supplemental Development Charges,it should identify the process and timing for their approval and 'unplementation. Agenda Item: Hearing Date: December 3,2012 Time: 7:00 PM STAFF REPORT TO THE �� PLANNING COMMISSION : FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON 120 DAYS = N/A SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: ADOPT WEST BULL MT. CONCEPT PLAN RECOMMENDED LAND USES AND ASSOCIATED POLICIES FILE NO.: Comptehensive Plan Amendment(CPA) CPA2012-00002 PROPOSAL: To amend the current Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map to include map designarions for the River Terrace Community Plan area based on recommended land uses found in Washington Counry's West Bull Mt. Concept Plan; to amend the current Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goal 14: Urbanization goals, policies, and recommended action measures. APPLICANT: Ciry of Tigard OWNER: N/A 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 LOCATION: River Terrace Community Plan Area APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Communiry Development Code Chapters 18.380 and 18.390; Comprehensive Plan Goals 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ,12, 13, and 14; Metro Functional Plan Title 11; and Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14. SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission finds this request to meet the necessary approval criteria and RECOMMENDS tlle Tigard Ciry Council amends the Tigard Comprehensive Plan text and map as determined through the public hearing process. S"1'AI�I'RF,POR"I"1'O'I'f IL''1'1.ANNING COi�iMISSI(�N CP;�2012-00002 PAGF?1 OF 17 SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Project History The ciry has agreed via an intergovernmental agreement (IGA) with Washington County to refine its West Bull Mt. Concept Plan into the River Terrace Community Plan. The community plan will put into place a means to implement the vision of the concept plan through zoning, development code regulations and other measures that will make urban development possible. The process will also include updates to utility, parks and transportation master plans, including the financial strategies necessary to fund and maintain required infrastructure improvements. The concept plan was created over the course of three years with the help of a stakeholder working group (SWG) and a technical advisory committee (TAC). Project goals and principles guided the development of the land use, transportation and parks framework maps. These maps represented the vision stakeholders agreed upon for the future development of the area. They provide a variety of residential densities and housing rypes; disperse densities throughout the community; provide appropriate amounts of commercial uses, parks, trails and open space; and outline a multi-modal network of connected stYeets and walkable blocks. The SWG and TAC both voted to forward the concept plan to the Washington Counry Planning Commission and Board of Commissioners for considerarion and adoption. In November 2010, the Planning Coininission voted to recommend the Board adopt the concept plan. In December 2010, the Board adopted the concept plan by Resolution and Order. Since the conclusion of the concept plan, the ciry has annexed a portion of the area (r�rea 64) and petitions have been filed by property owners to annex the remainder of the area within the urban growth boundary (Areas 63 and Roy Rogers West). The city will complete the River Terrace Community Plan for all of tliese areas. City staff has developed a work program to guide the project through completion. This will include a lot of technical work to ensure the community plan meets the state and regional planning requirements, as well as a public invoh=ement plan to engage stakeholders in any necessary refinements to the concept plan as the process moves forward. Staff anticipates completion of the River Terrace Communiry Plan in summer 2014. The first recommendation is to adopt the concept plan recommended land uses (Exhibit A) into the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. This action will set expectations for the community planning process, as well as allowing the ciry to access a portion of the CET funds from Metro that were given to the ciry through the IGA ��ith Washington Counry. A number of policies will also be recommended for adoption to guide regulation of the River Terrace area during and after completion of the community planning process (Exhibit A). These recommended land uses will be further analyzed as part of the community planning process and if there are needed refinements, recommendations will be brought back to planning commission and city council for adoption at the end of the process. Proposal Description The primary intent of the amendment is to ensure the Ciry's Comprehensive Plan remains a viable tool for decision-makers. By adopting the amendment, the City will set expectations for the River Terrace Community Plan process and start the transformation from vision to zoning and regularions for the area. S'1'AI'l�RI?POR'1"I'O'THE YL..ANNING COMMISSION CPA 2012-00002 PAGE 2 OF 17 SECTION IV. SUMMARY OF REPORT Applzcable critena, Commi��zon Jinding.r and conclusion.r • Tigard Community Development Code o Chapter 18.380 o Chapter 18.390 • Applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies o Chapter 1: Citizen Involvement o Chapter 2: Land Use Planning o Chapter 5: Natural Resources and Historic Areas o Chapter 6: En�rironmental Quality o Chapter 7: Hazards o Chapter 8: Parks, Recreation,Trails,and Open Space o Chapter 9: Economic Development o Chapter 10: Housing o Chapter 11: Public Facilities and Services o Chapter 12: Transportation o Chapter 13: Energy Conservation o Chapter 14: Urbanization • Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Tide 11 • Statewide Planning Goals o Goals 1, 2, 5, G, 7, 8,9, 10, 11, 12, 13,and 14. City Departmenl and oaat,rirte agency comments SECTION V. APPLICABLE CRITERIA AND COMMISSION FINDINGS CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (TITLE 18) Chapter 18.380: Zoning Mati and Text Amendments Chapter 18.380.020 Legislative Amendments to the Title and Map A. Legislative amendments. Legislative zoning map and text amendments shall be undertaken by means of a Type IV procedure, as governed by Section 18.309.060G F'�indin�s: The amendment to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan establishes policies to be applied generally throughout the River Terrace Community Plan Area; and therefore, the applicat�on is being �rocessed as a Type IV procedure, Legislative Amendment, as governed by Section 18.390.OGOG. Chapter 18.390: Decision-Making Procedures Chapter 18.390.020. Description of Decision-Making Procedures B.4. Type IV Procedure. Type IV procedures apply to legislative matters. Legislative matters involve the creation, revision, or large-scale implementation of public policy. Type IV matters are considered initially by the Planning Commission with final decisions inade by the City Council. Fin�s: The amendment to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan establishes policies to be applied generally throughout the City of Tigard. Therefore was reviewed under the Type IV procedure as detailed in Section 18.390.O60.G. In accordance with this section, the amendment was initially considered by the Planning Commission with Ciry Council making the final decision. Chapter 18.390.OGO.G. Decision-making considerations. The recommendation by the Commission and the decision by the Council shall be based on consideration of the S'1':V�I�ltl?POIt"1"1'O'1'I II?PLANN[NG CUMMISSI(�)N (:P;1 2012-00002 PAGL'3 OI�17 following factors: 1. The Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines adopted under Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 197; 2. Any federal or state statutes or regulations found applicable; 3. Any applicable Metro regulations; 4. Any applicable comprehensive plan policies; and 5. Any applicable provisions of the Ciry's implementing ordinances. Findin�s: The Cominission reviewed applicable Statewide Planning Goals, Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan, the Tigard Communiry Development Code, and the Tigard Com�rehensi�-e Plan. As indicated pursuant to the Coininission's fmdings and conclusions found within this staff report the amendment is consistent with this criterion. CONCLUSION: Based on the analysis above, the Commission finds that the proposed amendment satisfies the applicable review criteria within the Tigard Communiry Development Code. CITY OF TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES: General Findin�s Findin�: The City's Comprehensi�e Plan was adopted by the Tigard City Council in 1983, and acknowledged as being in conformance with the Statewide Planning Goals by the Land Conservauon and Development Department (LCDC) on October 11, 1984. LCDC re- acknowledged the plan's compliance with the statewide planning goals through the Periodic Review process. Findin� The Commission finds that the following Comprehensive Plan goals and policies apply to the amendment and the amendment satisfies the applicable goals and policies for the reasons stated below. During the course of public hearings, the Communiry Development Department and the Planning Commission provided all interested parues opportunities to idenrify, either orally or in writing, any other Comprehensive Plan goals or policies that might apply to the amendment. No additional provisions were identified. Chapter 1: Citizen Involvement Goal 1.1 Provide citizens, affected agencies, and other jurisdictions the opportuniry to participate in all phases of the planning process. Policy 2. The City shall define and publicize an appropriate role fot citizens in each phase of the land use planning process. Findings: 'I'he proposal has complied with all notification requirements pursuant to Chapter 18.390.060 of the Tigard Community Development Code. This staff report was also available seven days in advance of the hearing pursuant to Chapter 18.390.070.E.b of the Tigard Community Development Code. S'1'A1�1��RI?POR'I"1'O'17I1�;Y].ANNING COMMISSION CPA 2012-00002 PAGL 4 UI�17 As part of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment process, public notice of the Planning Commission and Ciry Council public hearings was sent to the interested party list, River Terrace property owners and property o�vners within 500 ft. of River Terrace and published in the November 15, 2012 issue of The Times. The notice invited public input and included the phone number of a contact person to answer questions. The notice also included the address of the City's webpage where the entire draft of the proposed amendment could be viewed. Policy 3. The City shall establish special citizen advisory boards and committees to provide input to the City Council, Planning Commission, and Ciry staff. Findin�s: The West Bull Mt. Concept Planning recommendations were endorsed by both the project's steering committee and technical advisory committee. These groups included community stakeholders, property owners and jurisdictional parrners. Policy 5. The opportunities for citizen involvement provided by the Ciry shall be appropriate to the scale of the planning effort and shall involve a broad cross-section of the community. Findinos_ As outlined above, the community was given notice and opportunity to get information and get testify. Goa11.2 Ensure all citizens have access to: A. opportunities to communicate directly to the City; and B. information on issues in an understandable form. Policy 1. The City shall ensure pertinent information is readily accessible to the community and presented in such a manner that even technical information is easy to understand. Findines Informarion regarding the topics included in this Comprehensive Plan Amendment was available in multiple locations in an understandable format for the duration of the process. This included paper and electronic copies that were available in the permit center and also on the websitc. Policy 2. The City shall utilize such communication methods as mailings, posters, newsletters, the internet, and any other available media to promote citizen involvement and continue to evaluate the effectiveness of inethods used. Fin�s: Informarion was distributed throughout the process via the City's website and direct mailings to property owners in the River Terrace area and all property owners within 500 ft. of the area. Policy 5. The City shall seek citizen participation and input through collaboration with community organizations, interest groups, and individuals in addition to City sponsored boards and committees. Findings: The West Bull Mt. Concept Planning recommendations were endorsed by both the project's steering committee and technical advisory committee. These groups included community stakeholders, property owners and jurisdictional partners. S'I':�I�I�RI?POR'1"1'O'17I1?P1..INNING COti11fISS]ON CPA 20]2-00002 PAGI:5 OF�17 Chapter 2: Land Use Plannin� Gc:>a12.1 Maintain an up-to-date Comprehensive Plan, impleinenting regulations and action plans as the legislative basis of Ti�ard's land use plannin�pro�;ram. Policy 1: The City's land use program shall establish a clear policy direction, comply with state and regional requirements, and serve its citizens' own interests. Findin�s: The amendment refines the general policy direction related to Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goal 14: Urbanization for completion of the communiry plan and subsequent development of the River Terrace Area. The policy statements are clear and serve the interests of the citizens. The city coordinated the development of the proposed polices with the Oregon Department of Transportation, the llepartment of Land Conservation and Development, and Metro to ensure compliance with state and regional requirements. Policy 2: The Ciry's land use regulations, related plans, and implementing actions shall be consistent with and implement its Comprehensive Plan. Findin�s: The amendment refines the general policy direction related to Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goal 14: Urbanization for completion of the communiry plan and subsequent development of the River Terrace Area. It also applies comprehensive plan designauons to the Ri�rer Terrace Area that are based on the West Bull Mt. Concept Plan recommended land uses. Both will be used to guide the application of Tigard zoning and regulations to the area that will be consistent with the comprehensive plan. Policy 3. The City shall coordinate the adoption, amendment, and implementation of its land use program with other potentially affected jurisdictions and agencies. Findin�s: The City sent out request for comments on the proposed amendment to all potentially affected jurisdicrions and agencies. All were gi�=en 14 days to respond. Any comments that were received are addressed in Section VIL• Outside Agency Comments of this Staff Report. r�dditionally, Metro, the Oregon Department of Transportation, and the Department of Land Conservarion and Development staff provided input throughout the development of the proposed amendment. Policy 20. The City shall periodically review and if necessary update its Comprehensive Plan and regulatory maps and implementing measures to ensure they are current and responsive to communiry needs, provide reliable information, and conform to applicable state law, administrative rules, and regional requirements. Fi�ndin�s: The proposed amendment will update the Tigard Comprehensive Plan map and policies to prepare for the future development of the River Terrace rlrea. The area has been brought into the urban growth boundary and a concept plan completed. The concept plan was a collaboration of many stakeholders, regulatory agencies, and local jurisdictions. The amendment will set the stage for the transfortnation of the concept plan into a community plan �vhere the applicarion of zoning and regularions will take place. The community plan will provide reliable infortnarion to make findings against applicable laws and requirements. Findings of conformance to applicable state and regional requirements for this amendment can be found in Section V of this Staff Report. STAPP REPOK'1"I'O'1'!I1:PI.,ANNING COMMItiSION CPA 2012-00002 PAGE 6 OF]7 Chapter 5: Natural Resources and Historic Areas Goal 5.1 Protect natural resourees and the environmental and ecological funetions they provide and, to the extent feasible, restore natural resources to create naturally functioning systems and high levels of biodiversity. Findin�s: As discussed in the findings made for Statewide Planning Goal 5, the amendment does not alter the City's acknowledged Goal 5 inventories or land use programs. No changes will occur to current Natural Resource protections as the result of adopting the proposed amendment. The amendment does not conflict with goals and policies of this chapter of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. Chapter 6: Environmental Quality Goa16.1 Reduce air pollution and improve air qualiry in the community and region. Policy 3: The City shall promote land use patterns, which reduce dependency on the automobile, are compatible with existing neighborhoods, and increase opportunities for walking, biking, and /or public transit. Findings: The proposed amendment designates comprehensive plan land uses based on the recommended land uses found in the concept plan. The concept plan was completed using a principle of transportation choices and connectivity. The concept plan provided for a broad range of connected infrastructure that allowed convenient access for pedestrians, cyclists, drivers, and transit riders. It also recommended a neighborhood commercial area that is accessible by bike or foot from the neighborhoods adjacent to and within the planning area. Giving residents a variety of choices will promote the reducuon of vehicle miles traveled. No transportation amendments are proposed at this time, but will be addressed during the community planning process. Chapter 7: Hazards Goa17.2 Protect people and property from flood, landsLide, eatthquake,wildfire, and severe weather hazards. Findin�s: The adoption of the proposed amendment has no impact on City policies or programs related to hazards. The community plan will address hazards through the application of zoning and code regulations. �hapter 8: Parks, Recreation,Trails, and Open Space Goa18.1 Provide a wide variery of high quality park and open spaces for all residents, including both: a. developed areas with facilities for active recreation; and b. undeveloped areas for nature-oriented recreation and the protection and enhancement of valuable natural resources within the parks and open space system. S"1':V�F REPOR"I'TO TFIE PI.ANNING CO:�iMISSION CY.�2012-00002 P:\CI?7OI�17 Goa18.2 Create a city�;Tide net�j-ork of intercannected on- and off-road pedestrian and bicycle trails. Findin�The adoption of the proposed amendment has no unpact on Ciry policies or programs related to parks, recreation, trails, and open space. The comprehensive plan map will have open space designations added with the amendment, but the city has no zoning to identify properties for these uses. Recommended locations will be finalized through the community planning process and address needed parks, trails, and open space. The Tigard Parks System Master Plan will be updated as part of the process and guide future city facilities. Chapter 9: Economic Development Goa19.3 Make Tigard a prosperous and desirable place to live and do business. Findin�s: The proposed amendment designates five acres of the River Terrace area as neighborhood commercial on the Tigard Comprehensive Plan map. The concept plan intended this commercial area to serve as a retail, rruxed-use gathering place for the neighborhoods in close proxuniry. The overall vision of the concept plan is to create a network of multi-modal transportation itnprovement to promote walking and biking through the neighborhoods to access the commercial area. The concept plan stakeholders recommended this approach as opposed to auto-oriented commercial development to make the area more desirable and livable. Chapter 10: Housing Goal 10.1 Pr�vide opportunities for a variety of housing types to meet the diverse housing needs af current and future City residents. Findin�s: The proposed amendment designates the majority of land within the River Terrace area as residential on the Tigard Comprehensive Plan map, divided into low, medium, and high density. The range of comprehensive plan designations will allow for a variety of housing types on different sized lots to meet the housing needs of future residents in the area. This diversiry will also allow the city to comply with Metro Tide 11 requirement of 10 units/net developable acre. Tigard zoning and regulations �vill be applied to the area during the community planning process based on the proposed comprehensive plan designations. Chaptet 11: Public Facilities and Services Goa111.1 Develop and maintain a stormzvater system that protects development,water resources, and wildlife habitat. Fin�_ 'I'he adoption of the proposed amendment has no impact on City policies or programs related to stormwater. However, the concept plan process outlined the necessary infrastructure needed to accommodate the recommended land uses. The community plan will analyze the findings of the concept plan and update stormwater needs and cost estimates as necessary. The Tigard Public Facility Plan will then be updated accordingly. 5'1'AI�I�R13POR'1"1'O'1'1�1:PLANNING COMMISSION CPA 2012-00002 R\GI?8 OF 17 Goa111.2 Secure a reliable, high quality,��vater supply to rneet the existin� and future needs of the cc>inmunity. FindinQS: The adoption of the proposed amendment has no unpact on City policies or programs related to its water distribution. However, the concept plan process outlined the necessary infrastructure needed to accommodate the recommended land uses. The Tigard Water Master Plan also accounted for the recommended land uses in the River Terrace area when calculating future need. The community plan will analyze the findings of the concept plan and update water infrastructure needs and cost estimates as necessary. The Tigard Public Faciliry Plan will then be updated accordingly. Goa111.3 Develop and maintain a wastewater collection system that meets the existing and future needs of the communiry. Findines: The adoption of the proposed amendment has no impact on City policies or programs related to wastewater collection. However, the concept plan process outlined the necessary infrastructure needed to accommodate the recommended land uses. Clean Water Services is currently updating its regional collection model and these results will be incorporated into the community planning process. The community plan will analyze the findings of the concept plan and update water infrastructure needs and cost estimates as necessary. The Tigard Public Faciliry Plan will then be updated accordingly. Chapter 12: Transportation Goal 12.1 Develop mutually supportive land use and transportation plans to enhance the livability of the community. Goa112.2 Develop and maintain a transportation system for the efficient movement of people and goods. Goa112.3 Provide and accessible, multi-modal transportation system that meets the mobility needs of the community. Fin�s: The proposed amendment is consistent with these goals. The coinprehensive land use designations were developed through the concept planning process, which took into account the transportation impacts of the recommended land uses.Although no transportation unprovements are proposed to be adopted at this time, the communiry planning pxocess will analyze and refine the transportarion proposals to support the zoning applied in the process. The concept plan was also completed using a principle of transportation choices and connectivity. The concept plan provided for a broad range of connected infrastructure that allowed convenient access for pedestrians, cyclists, drivers, and transit riders. The community planning process will incorporate findings and infrastructure needs into the Tigard 2035 Transportation System Plan and address the State's Transportation Planning Rule as required. The Tigard Public Facility Plan will then be updated accordingly. S'1'Al�l�RI�,POIt'1'"1'O"17II�.YL.ANNING COMMISSION CPA 2012-00002 Pr\GI?9 O[�17 Chapter 13: Energy Conservation Goa113.1 Reduce energy consumption. Policy 1: The City shall promote the reduction of energy consumption associated with vehicle miles traveled through: A. land use patterns that reduce dependency on the automobile; B. public transit that is reliable, connected, and efficient; and C. bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure that is safe and well connected. Findin�s: The proposed amendment designates comprehensive plan land uses based on the recommended land uses found in the concept plan. The concept plan was completed using a principle of transportation choices and connectivity. The concept plan provided for a broad range of connected infrastructure that allowed convenient access for pedestrians, cyclists, drivers, and transit riders. It also recommended a neighborhood commercial area that is accessible by bike or foot from the neighborhoods adjacent to and within the planning area. Giving residents a variety of choices will promote the reduction of vehicle miles traveled. No transportation amendments are proposed at this time, but will be addressed during the communiry planning process. Cha�ter 14: Urbanization Goa114.1 Provide and/or coordinate the full range of urban level services to lands and citizens witliin the Tigard City Limits. Findin�s: The proposed amendment adopts the recommended land uses from the concept plan into the Tigard Comprehensive Plan map. This is the first step of the process to plan for the provision of urban level services to the River Terrace area, which will be served by the city of Tigard. This amendment does not address the full range of services needed for the area, this will take place during the community planning process. The result will be an updated public faciliry plan and an infrastructure financing strategy for the future development of the area. Goal 14.2 Promote Tigard citizens' interests in urban growth boundaty expansion and other regional and state growth management decisions. Findin� The proposed amendment is consistent with this policy as this is the first step in completing the River Terrace Community Plan for areas brought within the urban growth boundary. The city will be the service provider for the area and completing the community plan is in Tigard citizens'interest. CONCLUSION: Based on the analysis above, the Commission fmds that the proposed amendment satisfies the applicable goals and policies contained in the City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan. METRO URBAN GROWTH MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONAL PLAN TITLE 11 FindinQS: The Regional Framework Plan calls for long-range planning to ensure that areas brought into the UGB are urbanized efficiendy and become or contribute to mixed-use, walkable, transit friendly communities. It is the purpose of Tide 11 to guide such long-range planning for S1'AI'l�ItEPORT TO'I'FIE?PI��NNING COtiiMISSION CPA 2012-00002 P:1G1',10 O1�17 urban resernes and areas added to the UGB. It is also the purpose of Tide 11 to provide interun protection for areas added to the UGB until city or county amendments to land use regulations to allow urbanization become applicable to the areas. The proposed amendment will update the Tigard Comprehensive Plan map and policies to prepare for the future development of the River Terrace Area. The area has been brought into the urban growth boundary (Areas 63 and 64 in 2002; Roy Rogers West in 2011) and a concept plan completed. The concept plan was a collaboration of many stakeholders, regulatory agencies, and local jurisdictions. The amendment will set the stage for the transformation of the concept plan into a community plan where the application of zoning and regulations will take place. The communiry plan will provide reliable information to make findulgs against all requirements of Tide 11. The concept plan made findings against Tide 11 (those in place in 2007) and found the work to be in compliance related to requirements for a concept plan. This included the requirement of average residential densities of at least 10 units per net residential acre. The concept plan averaged 10.7 units per net residenrial acre in Areas 63 and 64 (216 acres and 2,311units). The 2011 urban growth boundary expansion included in this proposed amendment (Roy Rogers West) is subject to updated Tide 11 rules. The new rules require a zoned capaciry for a number and type of housing unit for new areas added to the UGB. Roy Rogers West required zoned capacity for a mulimum of 479 dwelling units dispersed in the area or adjoining Areas 63 and 64. The proposed land uses will achieve the target through applicarion of various city zoning districts that meet the criteria for low and medium density residential designations (1 to 12 units/acre). The flexibility afforded the city during the community planning process will ensure compliance with Tide 11. The proposed amendment also meets the requirements for sufficient commercial services, inventory of and protection plan for natural resources, and a conceptual school plan. Each of the three is shown with a Tigard Comprehensive Plan map designation. The commercial area will provide basic services for the area. The open spaces coincide with Clean Water Services setback requirements and the school district owns the property designated as public institution and anticipates the development of a school once enough homes have been built to support it. The proposed amendment also sets policy direction consistent with Title 11 for interim protection of areas added to the UGB. The city will not allo�v urban level development of the area until the community plan is complete and compliance with all regional and state requixements are confirmed. The proposed amendment is a first step to set expectations for the community planning process. The concept plan found compliance with Tide 11 requirements and the community plan will be required to do the same. The city worked with Metro, the Oregon Department of Transportarion and Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development staffs to ensure their concerns were addressed for the proposed amendments. They were provided the opportunity to review and comment on all work leading up to the document proposed for adoption. The proposed amendment (CPA2012-00002) adopts the West Bull Mt. Concept Plan recommended land uses into the Tigard Comprehensive Plan map and adds policies to prepare for the future development of the River Terrace Area. The area has been brought into the urban growth boundary and a concept plan completed. It will set the stage for the transformation of the concept plan into a community plan where the application of zoning and regulations �vill take Sl'�V�I�RL�.PUK"I'TO TI i}�Pl.:ANNINU CC)MMIStiION CPA 2012-00002 PAGI?ll OT]7 place. 'I'he community plan will provide reliable informarion to make final findings against applicable laws and requirements. The proposed amendment is consistent Tide 11. CONCLUSION: Based on the analysis above, the Commission finds that the proposed amendment is consistent with the Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Title 11. THE STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS AND GUIDELINES ADOPTED UNDER OREGON REVISED STATUTES CHAPTER 197 Statewide Planning Goa11 —Citizen Involvement: This goal outlines the citizen involvement requirement for adoption of Comprehensive Plans and changes to the Comprehensive Plan and implementing documents. Findin�s: This goal was met as the proposal has complied �vith all notification requirements pursuant to Chapter 18.390.060 of the Tigard Community Development Code. This staff report was also available seven days in advance of the hearing pursuant to Chapter 18.390.070.E.b of the Tigard Community Development Code. As part of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment process, public notice of the Planiung Commission and City Council public hearings was sent to the interested parties list, property owners in the area and within 500 ft. and published in the November 15, 2012 issue of The Times (in accordance with Tigard Development Code Chapter 18.390). The notice invited public input and included the phone number of a contact person to answer questions. The notice also included the address of the Ciry's webpage where the entire draft of the text changes could be viewed. Statewide Planning Goa12 —Land Use Planning: This goal outlines the land use planning process and policy framework. The Comprehensive Plan was acknowledged by DLCD as being consistent with the statewide planning goals. Fi_ n� The amendment to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan is being undertaken to update the City's acknowledged Comprehensive Plan in a manner consistent �uith current conditions and citizen values. The amendment to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan is being processed as a Type IV procedure, which requires any applicable statewide planning goals, federal or state statutes or regulations, Metro regulations, comprehensive plan policies, and City's implementing ordinances, be addressed as part of the decision-making process. All noticing requirements have been met. All applicable review criteria have been addressed within this staff report; therefore, the requirements of Goa12 have been met. Statewide Planning Goa15 —Natural Resources This goal requires the inventory and protection of natural resources, open spaces, historic areas and sites. Findines: The Ciry is currendy in compliance �vith the State's Goal 5 program and Metro's Tide 13: Nature in Neighborhoods program, which implements Goal 5. The amendment does not alter the City's acknowledged Goal 5 inventories or land use programs. No changes will occur to current natural resource protections. As a result, the amendment to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan is in compliance with Goa15 process xequirements. S'1"�V�1�Itl�?POIt'1"1'O'1'III;P1.ANNINC COMMISSION CPA 20]2-00002 PAGI:12 Of�17 Statewide Planning Goal G: Air,Water, and Land Resoutces Qualiry To maintain and improve the quality of the air,water, and land resources of the state. Findin�s: The City is currendy in compliance with Metrds Tide 3: Water Quality and Flood IVlanagement program, which implements Goal 6. The amendment does not alter the City's acknowledged land use programs regarding water quality and flood management protections. As a result, the amendment to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan is in compliance with Goa16. Statewide Planning Goal? —Areas Subject to Natural Hazards To protect people and property from natural hazards. Findin�s: The City is currendy in compliance �vith Metro's Tide 3: Water Qualiry and Flood Management program, which implements Goal 7. The amendment does not alter the City's acknowledged land use programs regarding water quality and flood management protections. The City is currendy a participant in the Narional N'lood lnsurance Program administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The amendment does not alter the City's parricipation. As a result, the amendment to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan is in compliance with Goa17. Statewide Planning Goa18 —Recreational Needs This goal requires the satisfaction of the recreational needs of the citizens of the state and visitors and, where appropriate, to provide for the siting of necessary recreational facilities including destination resorts. Findines: The City is currendy in compliance with Statewide Planning Goal 8. The amendment does not alter the City's acknowledged Goal 8 policies or land use programs. As a result, the amendment to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan is in compliance with Goal 8. Statewide Planning Goa19: Economic Development To ptovide adequate opportunities throughout the state for a variety of economic activities vital to the health,welfare, and prosperity of Oregon's citizens. Fin�s: The City is currendy in compliance with Goal 9 and Metro's Tide 4: Industrial and Other Employment Areas through its acknowledged Comprehensive Plan. The amendment does not alter the City's acknowledged Goal 9 policies or land use programs. As a result, the amendment to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan is in compliance with Goa19. Statewide Planning Goa110: Housing To provide adequate housing for the needs of the community, region and state. Findin4s�. The City is currendy in compliance with Goal 10 and the Metropolitan Housing Rule (OAR 660-007/Division 7), and Metrds Tide 1: Housing Capacity, and Tide 7: Housing Choice. The City is currendy under periodic review and performing a Goal 10 analysis,which includes the River Terrace area. The adoption of the amendment does not alter the City's compliance with Goal 10 as the addition of the recommended land uses in the River Terrace area is consistent with state and regional housing requirements. The amendment to the Comprehensive Plan is in compliance with Goal 10. Statewide Planning Goa111: Public Facilities and Services To plan and develop a timely, orderly and efficient arrangement of public facilities and services to serve as a framework for urban and rural development. S"1'nl�l�R�?POIt'1"1'O"1'I II:P1.ANNING COMMISSION CP�1 2012-00002 PAGE 13 Ol�l7 Findin�s: The City is currendy in compliance with Goal 11 through its acknowledged Comprchcnsive Plan. This includes an adopted Public Facility Plan as required b}r Oregon Revised Statute 197.712 and Oregon Administrative Rule 660-011. The amendment does not alter the City's acknowledged Goal 11 policies or plans. However, as part of the River Terrace Community Plan process, the Public Facility Plan will be updated to account for the recommended land uses and future development of the area, including a financing strategy. As a result, the amendment to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan is in compliance with Goal 11. Statewide Planning Goa112: Transportation To provide and encourage a safe, convenient, and economic transportation system. Findin�s: The Ciry is currently in compliance with Goal 12 and Metro's Regional Transportauon Plan through its acknowledged Comprehensive Plan and Transportation System Plan as required by Oregon Administrative Rule 660-012 (Transportation Planning Rule). The amendment adopts the recommended land uses from the West Bull Mt. Concept Plan into the Tigard Comprehensive Plan map. The amendment also includes a policy to not allow development of the area until a full TPR analysis is complete. The River Terrace Community Plan process will make findings against the TPR based on the land uses proposed. As a result, the amendment to the Tigard Comprchcnsivc Plan is in compliance with Goal 12. Statewide Planning Goa113: Energy Conservation Land and uses developed on the land shall be managed and controlled so as to maximize the conservation of all forms of energy,based on sound economic principles. Findin�s: The City is currendy in compliance with Goal 13 through its acknowledged Comprehensive Plan. The amendment does not alter the City's compliance with Goal 13. As a result, the amendment to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan is in compliance with Goal 13. Statewide Planning Goa114: Urbanization To provide for an orderly and efficient transition form rural to urban land use, to accommodate urban population and urban employment inside utban growth boundaries, to ensure efficient use of land, and to provide for livable communities. F� The City is currend}' in compliance �vith Goal 14 and Metro's Tide 11: Planning for New Urban Areas through its acknowledged Comprehensive Plan and land use regulations. The City also has a signed Urban Planning Area Agreement and Urban Services rlgreement as required by ORS 195.065 and ORS 197. The proposed amendment will update the Tigard Comprehensive Plan map and policies to prepare for the future development of the River Terrace Area. The area has been brought into the urban growth boundary (Areas G3 and 64 in 2002; Roy Rogers West in 2011) and a concept plan completed. The concept plan �vas a collaboration of many stakeholders, regulatory agencies, and local jurisdictions. The amendment will set the stage for the transformation of the concept plan into a community plan where the application of zoning and regulations will take place. The community plan will provide reliable information to make findings against all requirements of Tide 11. The proposed amendment is a first step to set expectations for the community planning process. The concept plan found compliance with Tide 11 requirements and the community plan will be required to do the same. The city worked with Metro, the Oregon Department of Transportation and Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development staffs to ensure their concerns S'CAI�I�lil?YOR'1"1'O'1'1II�.P1.;1NN1NG COMMISSION Cl'A 2012-00002 PAGI�:14 OI�]7 were addressed for the proposed amendments. They were provided the opportunity to revie�v and comment on all work leading up to the document proposed for adoption. The adoption of the proposed amendment (CPA2012-00002) does not alter the Cit��'s compliance with Goal 14. The amendment is consistent with this goal. CONCLUSION: Based on the analysis above, the Coininission finds that the proposed amendment is consistent with the applicable Statewide Planning Goals. SECTION VI. ADDITIONAL CITY STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard's Community Development Department, Administrative Department, Finance Department, Public Works Department, and Police Department have had an opportunity to review this proposal and have no objections. CONCLUSION: Based on no comment from City staff, staff finds tLe proposed amendment does not interfere with the best interests of the City. SECTION VII. OUTSIDE AGENCY COMMENTS 'I'he following agencies/jurisdictions had an opportunity to review this proposal and did not respond: City of King City Ciry of Tualatin Clean Water Services Metro Land Use and Planning Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development Oregon Departrnent of Transportation, Region 1 Oregon Department of Transportation, Region 1, District 2A Tualatin Hill Parks and Recreation District Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Tualatin Valley Water District The following agencies/jurisdictions had an opportunity to review this proposal and sent in comments that are found as rlttachments 1 and 2: City of Beaverton Washington County, Department of Land Use and Transportation Findines: Washington County was supportive of the proposed amendment and recommended also adopting other elements of the West Bull Mt. Concept Plan, such as parks, trails and street classifications. The city is proposing this amendment as a first step in completing the required community plan for the area. The aforementioned elements will be reviewed and refined as necessary during the process and incorporated into the respective city master plans. The proposed amendment is in compliance with state and regional requirements. Updated master plans will be adopted during the community planning process and will ensure continued compliance with state and regional requirements. Staff recommends no changes to the proposed amendment based on the Washin�ton County comments. S'I'�U�I�RI?POR'1'"1'(_)'Pfll�,P].ANNING COIviMIStiION CPA 2012-00002 PnC;I:15 Of��17 The ciry of Beaverton recommended adding policies that addressed the importance of coordination among the two cities and other agency partners and developing cooperative agreements for phasing of unprovements along the boundary of River Terrace and South Cooper Mountain community plan areas. The city of Tigard acknowledges the importance of coordination during the planning process and has been in frequent discussions with agency partners. It is unportant and inherent in any large planning process. Tigard has convened the concept plan technical advisory committee to ensure information is being shared throughout the planning process. Tigard has also met with Beaverton staff a number of times and will continue to do so throughout the process. The city of Tigard has acknowledged the importance of coordination by several adopted policies currendy in the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. Some examples include Policy 2.1.3, Policy 5.1.4, Policy 6.2.2, Policy 7.1.3, Policy 11.1.2, Policy 11.3.2, Policy 12.5.1 and Policy 12.5.3. Tigard is in full support of coordination of planning efforts. The city's River Terrace Communin' Plan �vork program has included the unportance of coordination, as has the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends no changes to the proposed amendment based on the Washington County comments. CONCLUSION: Based on responses from outside agencies listed above, the Cominission finds the proposed amendment meets all requirements of these agencies and is consistent with the best interests of the Ciry. SECTION VIII. CONCLUSION The proposed changes comply with the applicable Statewide Planning Goals, applicable regional, state and federal regulations, the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, and applicable provisions of the City's unplementing ordinances. Therefore, Staff recommends that the Planning Coinmission recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Tigard City Council as determined through the public hearing process. ATTACHMENT: ATTACHMENT 1: CITY OF BEAVERTON COMMENTS ATTACHMENT 2: WASHINGTON COUNTY COMMENTS EXHIBIT A: PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. S"1'Af�l'RI;POR'f'1'O"1'f If�.PI.ANNING CO11MISSION CP;1 2012-00002 PAGE 1G(�I�17 /� U" �'..'`___�--`_.�. -� f/�'"'-�- No�ember 2(, 2012 PRFPAREI.� I3Y: Darren�'yss n�T� Senior Planner � ,� (%� y" ��y G' •� Navember 26�2012 APPRO`'ED BY:~T'om McGuire - v�1�'F Iriterim Comtniuuty Development Director S'1'Al'1�Rf?POR'1"I'O`l'I IE PL:�NNING COAfA[ISSIO?�I C:PA 2012-0(.)(}02 1'AGI3 17 OF 17 _.� �� Beavertan O R L C, 0 N . �;ommuni�y �nd Economic D�velopm�nt November 21, 2012 Darren Wyss, Senior Planner . City ofTigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 � RE: Camments for Comprehensive Plan Amendment {CPA) 2012-00002 —Adopt West Bull MT Concept P�an Recomrnended Land Uses and Associated Policies Dear Mr. Wyss: The City of 8eaverton has reviewed the proposed Tigard Comprehensive Plan Text Changes and offers the comments listed below. As you know, the City of Beaverton is preparing to launch a public planning process for the Sauth Coaper Mountain area located just north of SW Scholls Ferry Road and SW 175��'. Approximately 544 acres of what is also known as Urban Reserve Area (URA) 66 was added to the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) in Octaber 2011. �ne of the conditions Metro placed on the UGB expansion requires the City of Beaverton to prepare a concept plan for the entlrety of URA 6B (1,776 acres) as well as a community plan and corresponding comprehensive pian provisions and land use regulations for that portion of South Cooper Mountain now in the UGB, The City Council approved annexation of this 544- acre territory on November 13, 2012. Given the numerous common transportation, sewer, water, starmwater management, natural resource, and trails and transit service issues lnvolved in the River Terrace planning effort and Beaverton's upcoming Sou#h Cooper Mauntain project, the city suggests that policies be added regarding inter-jurisdictional coardination and cooperation as folfows: • Transportation & transit: It is recommended that policies be added requiring coordination among the two cities, Washington County, TriMet and ODOT to address transportation and transit, including timing of needed impravements and funding strategies and mechanisms. • Sewer, water and stormwater mana�ement: Policies requiring coordination among the two cities and Clean Water Services should be added to address common sewer, water and storm water management issues. ' City of Beaverton •4755 SW Griffith Drive • PO Bax 4755• Beavorton, OR 97076•www.BeavertonOreqon.gov • Natural resources: In addition, the city suggests a policy be added regarding coordination among the two cities, Metro, Tualatin Hills Parks & Recreation District and Washington County to address protection and enhancement of natural resources in the area, provision of access to public lands and natural features, including planning for trails and pedestrian and bicycle travel to access these lands and features, and connect with other local and regional trails. • . Inter�overnmental A�reements: The city recommends adding a policy regarding cooperative agreements among the two cities, Washington Caunty, CWS, and other appficable service providers to address phasing of development along SW Schofls Ferry and SW 175th/Roy Rogers, including timing of transportation sewer, water and stormwater improvements needed to support urban development in the River Terrace and South Cooper Mountain community plan areas. The Clty of Beaverton believes it is critical that the two jurisdictions coordinate particufarly clasely in the analysis of transportation and utilities, and cooperate with partner Jurisdictions and districts to find solutians ta meet the challenges we face in providing services to these urbanizing areas. It would be mutually beneficiai for the cities to work together on developfng financing strategies to take advantage of economies of scale and spread the costs of Infrastructure over a larger area. - Thank you for the opportunity to comment on Tigard's proposed Comprehensive Pian Text Changes. We (ook farward to coordinating with you as both cities move forward with their respective planning efforts. Sincerefy/ � / �/'%�/ ;' / -��,,/�� '�� Steven Sparks,AI � Planning Manager � 1NASHINGT�N COUNTY �� oRE�oN � November 20, 2012 City of Tigard Planning Division Attn.: Mr. Darren Wyss, Senior Planner 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: CPA2012-0002 Dear Mr. Wyss, The county appreciates the opportunity to participate in the city's planning of River Terrace and looks forward to completion of the River Terrace plan. The county supports the adoption of the West Bull Mountain Concept Plan into the city of Tigard's Comprehensive Plan. The county would also encourage the city's Comprehensive Plan to be amended to include other elements of the Concept Plan, such as parks, trails and street classifications. Please let me know if you have any questions. I can be reached by phone at (503) 846-8817 or via e-mail at paul schaefer(a�co.washington.or.us. Thank you a�'�..�'`� � �� Paul Schaefer Senior Planner T:�PLNG\WP3HAREIPAULS\WestBullMtn River TerracelCPA2012-00002.doc Department of Land Use 8a Transportation • Long Range Planning Division 155 N. First Avenue, Suite 350-14, Hillsboro, OR 97124-3072 phone: (503) 846-3519 • fax: (503) 846-4412 P�rkins COI� n�o N.W.Couch Street,Tenth Floor Portland,oR 97zo9-41zH Michael C.Robinson PHONE:50j.]2].2000 rxor+e:(503)727-2264 Fnx:5o3.7z7.zu2 Fex (503)346-2264 www.perkinscoie.com eM�iL MRobinson(c�perkinscoie.com December 3, 2012 VIA E-MAIL Mr. Tom Anderson,President City of Tigard Planning Commission City of Tigard City Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: City of Tigard File No. CPA 2012-00002; River Terrace Comprehensive Plan Map and Text Amendments Dear President Anderson and Members of the Tigard Planning Commission: I represent West Hills Development Company("West Hills"). I am writing on behalf of West Hills concerning the proposed River Tenace Comprehensive Plan map and text amendments. By adopting these comprehensive plan amendments now,the City of Tigard is setting the stage for the adoption of the River Terrace Community Plan and implementing land use regulations. West Hills very much appreciates the City's work on these amendments because West Hills is ready to develop its properties in the River Terrace area. The proposed map and text amendments, while setting the stage for the River Terrace Community Plan and implementing land use regulations,will not allow urban development in the River Terrace area until such time as the Community Plan, including land use regulations, is adopted. Therefore, while proposed Comprehensive Plan Goal 14.3, Policy 6, provides that the proposed land use designations will be the basis for the Community Plan and that refinements to the map amendments "shall be considered during the public planning process for the River Terrace Community Plan," West Hills would like the Planning Commission to know that it will be important to adopt some refinements.to the land use designation. While there may be other refinements, a significant refinement will be the location and size of the proposed open space designation in River Terrace. 37165-0000/LEGAL25281644.1 ANCHORAGE � BEIIING � BEILEVUE � BOISE � CHICAGO • DALLAS � DENVER � LOS ANGELES � MADISON • NEW VORK PALO ALTO • PHOENIX • PORTLAND • SAN DIEGO � SAN FRANCISCO • SEATTLE • SHANGHAI • WASHINGTON, D.C. P2fkI�S�012 LLP Mr. Tom Anderson, President City of Tigard Planning Commission December 3, 2012 Page 2 I have asked Senior Planner Darren Wyss to place this letter before you at tonight's public hearing and to provide me with written notice of the City Council's decision on these amendments. Very truly yours, �� C� Michael C. Robinson MCR:cfr Cc: Mr. Wally Remmers (via email) Mr. Dan Grimberg (via email) Mr. Tom Brian(via email) Mr. Darren Wyss(via email) 37165-0000/LEGAL25281644.1 P�rl�ns COIe nzo N.W.Couch Street,Tenth Floor Portland,OR 97zog-4iz8 Michael C.Robinson PHONE:50j.]2].2000 PHONE:�SO3��2�-ZZC)4 Fnx:5o3.7z7.zzza Fnx: (503)346-2264 www.perkinscoie.com eMni�: MRobinson@perkinscoie.com December 10, 2012 VIA E-MAIL Mayor Craig E. Dirksen City of Tigard City Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: City of Tigard File Comprehensive Plan Amendment(CPA)2012-0042 Dear Major Dirksen and Members of the Tigard City Council: This office represents West Hills Development Company ("West Hills"). I am writing on behalf of West Hills to support the Planning Commission recommendation that the City Council adopt map and text amendments to the Comprehensive Plan to begin the process of urban development for the River Terrace Community Plan area. The proposed amendments are an important first step in the development of the River Terrace Community Plan area. While the Concept Plan will obviously need to be refined, as provided for in proposed Goal 14.3, Policy 6, adopting the map and text amendments now begins the process of the community planning effort. Further,the proposed text amendments to Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goal 14, "Urhanization," will support the City's efforts to adopt the River Terrace Community Plan. Especially important in this effort will be the satisfaction of the Transportation Planning Rule, as described in proposed Goal 14.3, Policy 12. West Hills requests that the City Council follow the Planning Commission recommendation and adopt the proposed Comprehensive Plan map and text amendments. Very truly yours, ��ti�� Michael C. Robinson MCR:cfr Cc: Mr. Wally Remmers (via email) Mr. Dan Grimberg(via email) Mr. Tom Brian (via email) Mr. Darren Wyss (via email) ANCHORAGE • BEIIING • BELLEVUE � BOISE • CHICAGO � DALLAS • DENVER • LOS ANGELES � MADISON • MENLO PARK PHOENIX � PORTLAND • SAN DIEGO • SAN FRANCISCO • SEATTLE • SHANGHAI � WASHINGTON, D.C. 37165-0020/LEGAL25321498.1 Perkins Coie uv . " City o f Tigard - . , � Planning Commission Agenda MEETING DATE: December 3, 2012; 7:00 p.m. MEETING LOCATION: Ciry of Tigard —Town Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 1. CALL TO ORDER ��oo P.m. 2. ROLL CALL ��p•m• 3. COMMUNICATIONS ��ol P.m. 4. CONSIDER MINUTES ��03 p.m. 5. PUBLIC HEARING ��05 r.m. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA) 2012-00002 -TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO ADOPT WEST BULL MOUNTAIN CONCEPT PLAN RECOMMENDED LAND USES AND ASSOCIATED POLICIES— REQUEST: To amend the current Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map to include map designarions for the River Terrace Community Plan area based on recommended land uses found in Washington County's West Bull Mt. Concept Plan; to amend the current Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goal 14: Urbanization goals, policies, and recommended action measures. The complete text of the proposed amendment can be viewed on the City's website at http://www.tigard-or.gov/code_amendments. LOCATION: River Terrace Community Plan Area 6. WORKSHOP: CITY COUNCIL GOAL SETTING S�os p.m. 7. OTHER BUSINESS —9io5p."'. 8. ADJOURNMENT—9:lOp.m. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA— DECEMBER 3, 2012 Citv of Tieard I 13125 SV�'Hall Blvd.."I'i�ard_ nR 97223 I 5(13-(,39-4171 I �vw�v tioarrj-�r an�� I P�aP 1 nf 1 � 1 7'l��'1'11��1O'��1 SIG�`v-IN S�-�l:l:"J' � We ask you to limit your oral comments to 3 minutes. Written comments are always appreciated by the Planning Commission to supplement oral testimony & are entered into the record. Please submit any written testimony to the Planning Commission Secretary. AGENDA ITEM NO.: � DATE: I PAGE OF FILE NAME � -, , �.,� � P� CASE NOS.: �,� � �� _ � � �� IF YOU WISH TO TESTIFY QN THE ITEM INDICATED ABOVE, PLEASE PRINT YOUR NAME & ADDRESS — Please print clearly Name,Address,Zip Code I Name,Address,Zip Code I �'1 ic��L �r� �� (IZc� NW CWC�+ S7, ��7H �I�� - - '(��1��'L��I �?�-�- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Na dress,Zip C Name,Address,Zip Code ' � � r ��-�,z � sZS� ��,5 ��I�� 3 5 S vv 1 5—�3 ' h v`�^ , (�2 `=��c-�(a � - - - - - - - - - - - -�- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Name,Address,Zip Code � Name,Address,Zip Code C��'��"o" �". ' l�` �► � `v I 3 �� c �� I� � � � , 1 _ _ _ L _ _ _ _ � _ �_�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Name,Address,Zip Code Name,Address,Zip Code 1 I 1 — � — — — — — � — � — � � — � — — — — � — � — � — Name,Address,Zip Code I Name,Address,Zip Code 1 I I 1 � � — � — � — � � � � � � � � � � — � � � � Name,Address,Zip Code I Name,Address,Zip Code � � i I I � � � � � � � � � � � � � — �1� � � � — � � � � � � � � � � . 1/LRPLN/Planning Commission/Templates&Instructions/Testify Sign-in Sheets � i I --- -- — _ � -- — CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes December 3,2012 CALL TO ORDER :lcting President l��nderson callcd the meeting to order at 7:O2 p.m. 'I'he meering was held in the Ti�ard Civic Center,`I"awn I Ial.1, at ]3125 SW FIall Blvd. ROLL CALL Present: t�ctin� President rinderson Acting �'ice I'resident Rogers Commissioner pohert�r Commissioner Muldoon Commissioner Schmidt Commissioner Sha�Tey Absent: Commissioner Fitzgei-ald, Commissioner Ryan, .�lt. Cominissioner l��rmstrong, �11t. Commissioner Miller Staff Present: Tom �7cGuire, Interim Communit}- Development Direcr.or; Darren V�'yss, Sr. Planner; Chris Wiley, Sr. Admin Specialist COMMUNICATIONS - None CONSIDER MINUTES November 19�' Meeting Minutes: 1-�cting President Anderson as}:ed if there were any� additions, deleti�ns, or c��rrections tc> the November 19th minutes; there bcin� none, l�ndcrson declared the minutes apj�roved as submitted. OPENED PUBLIC HEARING CPA2012-00002 - TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO ADOPT WEST BULL MOUNTAIN CONCEPT PLAN RECOMMENDED LAND USES AND ASSOCIATED POLICIES Na commissioners abstained or reported a conflict c�f interest. No commissioner.s reported e� parte contacrs. I:\lR7W\Plannfng CommI5SI0n�2012 Packets\120312-PH kiver Terrace Com.Plan•Workshop Council Goals�tpc 120312 mtnutes FOR REVIEW.docx I'age 1 of 5 STAFF REPORT Senior 1'lanner Da.rren Wyss addressed the I'lanning Comrrussion. "I"he city is requesting Plann.in� Commission appro�Tal of a Comprehensive Plan rltx�endment. T'he plan will amend the Comprel�cnsi�-e Planning rnap to include land use designations for the River'I"�.rrace Concept Plan (K"I"CI') arca and to amend Uoal 14 �olicies �vhich i�rill �uide rcgvlation of the lt'I�CP area during and after compleuon of the communiry �lannin� process. '1'he proposed larid uses are based o��recammendauons made in the �X1est Iiull Mountain Concept Plan (WBMCP). The concept plan is a vision for the River'I errace area created over the course of three y�ears by Washin�ton Counry wirh tlze help of a stakeholder working group (SWU) and a techrucal ad�-isory comtnittee ("I'r1C;). The vision is represented in the land use, transportat.ion and parks framework maps, ��hich are intended to guide the future development of the area. The �G'BMCl' en�>isions a variety of residential densities and housing t��pes; dispersed densities throughout the commuiuty; an area that includes appr.opriate amount5 of commercial uses, parks, trails and open space; and an outline of a multi-modal net�•ork of connected streets and walkable blocks. 'I'he SWG and 'I'A(: both voted to forn��ard the concept plan to the ��'aslungton County (WACO) Planning Commission and the countv Board o£Commissioner.s for consideration and adopr�on. In November 201�, the W��CO I'lanning Comrnission vc�ted to recommend the Count}� Board adopt the concept plan. In December 2010, the Count�� Bc�ard adopted the concept plan bj- Resolution and C�rder. Since the conclusion of the cancept plan, the cir.j� annexed a portion of the area (.1rea C4) in fa112011. In spring 2O12, the cit�� agreed ��ia an intergovernmental agreement (IUA) with Washington Count�� to refine its West I3u11 Alounr.ain Concept Plan into the RizTer`l'errace Community Ylan. T'he concept plan is a rision. 1'hc community plan will put into place a means ta implement the ��ision of the concept plan through zoning, de�-elopment code regulations and other measures that�c711 make urban development possible. The process �711 include 11 total tasks that also include updates tc> utility�, parks and rransportation master plans, incluciing the financial stxategies necessar�� to fund and maintain required infrastructure impro��cments. One of the tasks is to adopt the concept plan's recommended lanrl uses (l lxhibit A of the Staff Repor.t) into the T'igard Comprehensivc Plan. 'I"his is what the cit�T is asking af the Planning Cc7mmission at this meeting. 'I'his action wzll set expectations for the communiry planning proccss, as well as allow thc city tc� access a poraon of the Cnnstrtiction Fxcise 'T'ax {CF"l�}; ft�nds from �letro that are given to the cinr through the Iiitergotrcrnmental 1lgrecmcrzt (IG_1) ��ith Washingt�n C:ount��. ,� number of policies will also be rec��mmended for adoptir�n tc.� I:\IRPLN\PlsnnfnQ Commis�lon\2032 Packets\320332•PH RfverTerrace Com.Plan•WorkshopCouncil Goals�tpc 120312 min�tes FOR REVIEW.docx 1�i1�C G OE J guide regulation c�f the River'I'errace area during and after completion of the community planning process. The propc�sed amendments bcfore the Planning Cominission at this meedn�;vvill not allo��- urban levcl develapment until thc River Terrace Camprchensive Plan is complete. 'I'hese recommended land uses ��ill bc fur.ther anal��zed as part of the communit�• plannin� process and if there is needed refinement rccommendauons ��ill be brought back to the planning commission and city council for adoption at the end c�f thc process. The proposed amendments mcet the criteria of'1'CDC ('I"igard C��inprehensive Development Code), including noticing requirements. r� Public Hearing notice was published in the I'igard 'I'imes on November 15��'. Staff sent out o�Ter G00 public hearing notices to property owners inside the Ri�er Terrace area and outside the area�vithin the 5t)0' perimeter. IZequests for comments were also sent to a number of partner agencies. 1'he City of Bea�•erton scnt in comments (l�ttachment 1 to the staff report) suggesung more policies to outline collaboration ��ith them during the R'I'CP process and South Cc�oper I�iountain plannin� process. The ciry found sufficient eYisting policies to signif�� its commitmcnt to collaboradon. City staff has met with Beaverton staff seti-eral times and represcntatives Erom the Cit�� of�ieavertan are participants cm our TAC. Therefore, staff recommends no changes based on the cc�mments "I'he city also received cc�mments today, ��hich �vere distributed at the beginning of this meeting (�vhich will be included as Attachment 3 to the staff report an�.+•ho�v� u.c�lttachment 1 tn �he.��e rrri��r.rte.,), from ntichael Robinson, Perkins Coie la�� firm, representing prc�perty owner��Uest Hills Development Company. 1�1r. Robinson's corres�ondence reports the}• are appreciatire of the proposcd amendments, but feel some refinemcnts �vill need to be made to the open space designations during the RTCP process. Staff presented Policy G (Eahibit 1� of r.he 5taff repart) t<� thc planning commission members to confirm staff anticipatcs considerauon of map refinements during the public planning process. The city included this policy as it developed its �vork program. Staff expects to anal��•r,e each elemcnt of thc concept plan and refine it as necessary. Staff recommends no changes based on the comments. .-�lso important to note, the cit�� doesn't have an open space/park zoning district. Open space area5 ��ill be zoned similar to adjacent land uscs and de��elopment will be re�ulated l�y the city's sensitive lands code. This ��ill include Clean W'ater Services (CWS) mandated stream and u•etland buffers, which is the majority of the open space sho��n in L?xhibit 1�. 1'�Ithough the city didn't get fc�rmal cotnments frc>m 0110`I' (Oregon Department of Transporcadon}, DLCD (I�cpartment of T and Cc�nservation and De�-elc�pment) or �tetro, city staff worked �vith thcin du.ring formulation of the policies in F:xhibit 1� and all agenc.ies are comfortable with this action. I:\IRPLN�PIan�ing Commhsion\2012 Vacke[s\32031]-VH 0.iver Terrsce Com.Vlan-Warkshop Council Goals\tpc 120312 minuees FOR REViEW.docx 1'age 3 �f 5 Staff rccommends I'lanning C:ommissic�n findings that this request meets the necessary approval criteria and that the Planning Commission �vill for��-ard its recc�mmendation to the Cit�� Council to approve the proposed amendments. QUESTIONS Cornrnissioner �luldoon had quesaans about future proceedin�;s. l�-Ir. �G'yss respc�nded that the concept plan w�ill go thru a series of 11 tasks. This action is the first ta5k; the concept plan and �vhat's included in it. Facl1 task ��ill be a proposal that w-ill be adopted through the legislati�-e process. Ultimatel��, council �vill dccide «-hat is or is not included in the communit�� plan. TESTIM4NY IN FAVOR �lichael lZabinson 1120 N��' Couch St 1 Utt' Flc�or 1'ortlacid OR 97208-412$, introciuced himself as the land use attor.ne}' acung on behalf of�'est Hills I�evel�pment Compan��. �1r. Robinson said city staff is off to a grcat start but the}• want to bc clear that there is an e�pectation that therc «�ill be rcfinements to the cc�ncepr. plan. `l'hey are loc�king fon�•ard to partnering�;rith the city on this de�Jelopmcnt but capect they «-ill be asking for some changes during t�ie ptocess of translating the vision into actual de�-clopment on thc ground. Dan Grunber�, (�Y/est �-�ills Develo�ment Com�an�� VG'est Hills/�rbor, 735 S�X' 158��', I3eavertan, C)R 97006, had signed up to tes[ify but�vaived his time aftcr �1r. Kobinsc>n spoke and said simply that he was also looking fonvard to workin�with the Cit�T to bring liis de�°elopment into the area. Gretchcn �uehner� 13249 S�' 136�� Place� Ti�ard OR 97223, a 'I"igard Cit}' Councilor, said she ��as not at thc meeting in her ca�aciry as a city councilor but as the attorne}� rcpresentin� a coupie of prc�perty owners from in ��hat was ��rea G4 and the Lrban Reserre immediately to the west. Councilor Buehner statcd that she would be recusing herself when this matter comcs before the Council. Re�;ardin� her clients' praperties, Councilor Buchncr said due to an adrrunistrari�-e oversight at VG'ashington Count��, a portion of thc Urban Keser.ve was not included in the c�ri�inal concept plan area, the propert}' right alang Scholls Feriy. She u�anted to make sure the Plannin�; Commission is a��vare of that and would hope the Plannin� Commission's recommendation to Ciry Council will include those picces of property. "I'here 4vill be another Urban Gro�vth Boundary ((JG�3) expansion in 2014 and an�� urban reserve must be concept planned before it can be considered far inclusion in the UCJB. Staff asl.ed I�1r. VZ'yss if he had knowlcdgc of the properties I�fs. Buehner was discussing. I�1r. Wyss said the amendment before the Plann.ing Commission at this ineeting tvas just for the area r.hat is currciltl�� included in Urban Growth I3oundar�-. I'h� properties 1�Is. I3uehner i5 talkin� about are in the Urt�an Resen-e ��rea. 'I'hat�vili be a separate planning�rocess. Councilor Iiuehner said regardless, she wants to keep remindin�thc Planning Caminission and Council about her clients' properties to make surc the ri�;ht things get done. TESTIMONY IN �PPOSITION — I�?one CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING t:\LRPLN\PWnnfng Commission\2012 Packets\120312-PH River ierrace Com.Plan-Workshop touncil Goals\tpc 120312 minut�s FOR RFVIEW.docK 1�'a�;e 4 o f 5 .�fter a bricf discussion, a morion was made. MOTION The follou�ing mation was made b}� Con�missioner tlluldo�n: "I move for approval of the application CPA 2012-00002 comprehensive plan amendment for the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Amendment to adopt the West Bull Mountain Concept Plan recommended land uses and associate policies." Comrnissic�ner Rogers seconded the motion. The motion was voted on and carried unanimously. CITY COUNCIL GOAL SETTING Interim Community Dc�relopment I�uectc�r"I"oin McGuire participated in a d.iscussion with Planning Corrunission members ta eciit t�ie recommendatic>ns the Planiun�C;omrrussion will present to C;ity C:ouncil as their recommended�oals for the Counciloi:s to c�nsider whe�i setting the 20"13 Council gc�als. (Sce finali7ed version sho��n as rlttachment 2 to these minutes). OTHER BUSINESS — Nonc ADJOURNMENT ��cun�President i�nderson adjourned dze meeting at 8:47 p.m. '--�~�\ e ,� CL Wilcy, ��cting Planning C �ssion Secretary . �z�. �� a� :�'I'I'ES1': ��cring President"i'om Anderson Per Commissioner Shave��'s rcqucst - Attachment 3 is added "for the recard." 'I'his attachment was approved by all coinnussioners (indicated b}� initials) present at the 12/17/12 Planning Co�nmission meeting during "consider the nunutes" agenda item. - c�.i.�:t<-� I:\IRPLN\Planning Commission\2012 Packets�320312-PH Rirer Terrace Com.Ylen-Workshop Council Goals\tpc 170312 minutes FOR REVIEW.dxx Page 5 of 5 ATTACHMENT 1 P�rkins COI� iizo N.W.Couch Street,Tenth floor Portland,OR 97zo9-4�z8 Michael C.Robinson PHONE:50j.]2].2000 PHONE:�SO3��Z�I-ZLG4 FAX: O . 2 .2222 5 37 7 F�x: (503)346-2264 www.perkinscoie.com EMna: MRobinson@perkinscoie.com December 3, 2012 VIA E-MAIL Mr. Tom Anderson, President City of Tigard Planning Commission City of Tigard City Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: City of Tigard File No. CPA 2012-00002; River Terrace Comprehensive Plan Map and Text Amendments Dear President Anderson and Members of the Tigard Planning Commission: I represent West Hills Development Company ("West Hills"). I am writing on behalf of West Hills concerning the proposed River Terrace Comprehensive Plan map and text amendments. By adopting these comprehensive plan amendments now, the City of Tigard is setting the stage for the adoption of the River Terrace Community Plan and implementing land use regulations. West Hills very much appreciates the City's work on these amendments because West Hills is ready to develop its properties in the River Terrace area. The proposed map and text amendments, while setting the stage for the River Terrace Community Plan and implementing land use regulations, will not allow urban development in the River Terrace area until such time as the Community Plan, including land use regulations, is adopted. Therefore, while proposed Comprehensive Plan Goal 14.3, Policy 6, provides that the proposed land use designations will be the basis for the Community Plan and that refinements to the map amendments "shall be considered during the public planning process for the River Terrace Community Plan," West Hills would like the Planning Commission to know that it will be important to adopt some refinements.to the land use designation. While there may be other refinements, a significant refinement will be the location and size of the proposed open space designation in River Terrace. 37165-0000/LEGAL25281644.1 ANCHORAGE � BEIIING • BEILEVUE • BOISE • CHICAGO � OALLAS • DENVER • l05 ANGELES • MADISON • NEW VORK PALO ALTO � PHOENIX • PORTLAND • SAN DIEGO • SAN fRANCISCO • SEATTLE � SHANGHAI • WASHINGTON, D.C. Perkins Coie ur Mr. Tom Anderson, President City of Tigard Planning Commission December 3, 2012 Page 2 I have asked Senior Planner Darren Wyss to place this letter before you at tonight's public hearing and to provide me with written notice of the City Council's decision on these amendments. Very truly yours, � c Michael C. Robinson MCR:cfr Cc: Mr. Wally Remmers (via email) Mr. Dan Grimberg (via email) Mr. Tom Brian (via email) Mr. Darren Wyss(via email) 37 I 65-0000/LEG AL25281644.1 . " City of Tigard . . . , Memorandum , ..";:3:9&YR,�@.` . iP3d3$R:" . �".7"'aW7'•Y4,"d�`� .�i:°iJ".8R'6W�'1Y'.Y4."�4:lYRY3."�� .."�a`°...:."'.aP'.'.2�: To: Ciry of Tigard Planning Commission From: Darren Wyss, Senior Planner Re: CPA2012-00002 Public Hearing Date: November 26, 2012 On Monday, December 3, 2012, the Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tigard Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2012-00002 and make its recommendation to Ciry Council. The proposal will: 1. amend tlle current Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map to include map designations for the River Terrace Community Plan area based on recommended land uses found in Washington County's West Bull Mt. Concept Plan;and 2. amend the current Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goal 14: Urbanization goals, policies, and recommended action measures. This action will set expectations for the River Terrace Communiry Planning process, as well as allo�v the ciry to access a portion of the CET funds from Metro that were given to the city through the IGA with Washington Counry. The policies will guide regulation of the River Terrace area during and after completion of the community planning process. These recommended land uses will be further analyzed as part of the communiry planning process and if there are needed refinements, recommendations will be brought back to planning commission and city council for adoption at the end of the process. The staff report and findings, as well as the associated amendments to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map and Goal 14 are attached. As always, if you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at darren(a�ti�a,� rd=or.gov or 503-718-2442. Agenda Item: Hearing Date: December 3,2012 Time: 7:00 PM STAFF REPORT TO THE „ PLANNING COMMISSION : - � FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON . , � ; 120 DAYS = N/A SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: ADOPT WEST BULL MT. CONCEPT PLAN RECOMMENDED LAND USES AND ASSOCIATED POLICIES FILE NO.: Comptehensive Plan Amendment(CPA) CPA2012-00002 PROPOSAL: To amend the current Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map to include map designations for the River Terrace Community Plan area based on recommended land uses found in Washington County's West Bull Mt. Concept Plan; to amend the current Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goal 14: Urbanizarion goals, policies, and recommended action measures. APPLICANT: Ciry of Tigard OWNER: N/A 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard,OR 97223 LOCATION: R.iver Terrace Community Plan Area APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380 and 18.390; Comprehensive Plan Goals 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ,12, 13, and 14; Metro Functional Plan Tide 11; and Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13,and 14. SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission finds this request to meet the necessary approval criteria and RECOI�IMENDS the Tigard Cit��Council amends the Tigard Comprehensive Plan text and map as determined through the public hearing process. STAFF RLPORT'I'O THE PLANNING COMMISSION CPA 2012-00002 PAGE 7 OI�]7 SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Project History The ciry has agreed via an intergovernmental agreement (IGA) with Washington Counry to refine its West Bull Mt. Concept Plan into the River Terrace Community Plan. The community plan will put into place a means to itnplement the vision of the concept plan through zoning, development code regulations and other measures that will make urban development possible. The process will also include updates to utiliry, parks and transportation master plans, including the financial strategies necessary to fund and maintain required infrastructure improvements. The concept plan was created over the course of three years with the help of a stakeholder working group (SWG) and a technical advisory committee (TAC). Project goals and principles guided the development of the land use, transportation and parks framewoxk maps. 'I'hese maps represented the vision stakeholders agreed upon for the future development of the area. They provide a variety of residential densities and housing types; disperse densities throughout the community; provide appropriate amounts of commercial uses, parks, trails and open space; and outline a multi-modal network of connected streets and walkable blocks. The SWG and TAC both voted to forward the concept plan to the Washington County Planning Commission and Board of Commissioners for consideration and adoption. In November 2010, the Planning Commission voted to recommend the Board adopt the concept plan. In December 2010, the Board adopted the concept plan by Resolution and Order. Since the conclusion of the concept plan, the city has annexed a portion of the area (Area 64) and petitions have been filed by properry owners to annex the remainder of the area within the urban growth boundary (Areas 63 and Roy Rogers West). The city will complete the River Terrace Community Plan for all of these areas. City staff has developed a work program to guide the project through completion. This will include a lot of technical work to ensure the community plan meets the state and regional planning requirements, as well as a public involvement plan to engage stakeholders in any necessary refinements to the concept plan as the process moves forward. Staff anticipates completion of the River Terrace Community Plan in summer 2014. The first recommendation is to adopt the concept plan recommended land uses (Exhibit A) into the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. This action will set expectations for the community planning process, as well as allowing the city to access a portion of the CET funds from Metro that were given to the city through the IGA with Washington Count��. A number of policies will also be recommended for adoption to guide regulation of the River Terrace area during and after completion of the community planning process (Exhibit A). These recommended land uses will be further analyzed as part of the community planning process and if there are needed refinements, recommendations will be brought back to planning commission and city council for adoption at the end of the process. Proposal Description The primary intent of the amendment is to ensure the Ciry's Comprehensive Plan remains a viable tool for decision-makers. By adopting the amendment, the City will set expectations for the Ri�-er Terrace Community Plan process and start the transformation from vision to zoning and regulations for the area. STAFF RE;PORT'I'O"I'F3E P1,ANNING COMMISSION CPA 2012-00002 PAGE 2 OP']7 SECTION IV. SUMMARY OF REPORT Applicable criteria, Commis.rion findings and conclusion.r • Tigard Commuruty Development Code o Chapter 18.380 o Chapter 18.390 • Applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies o Chapter 1: Cirizen Involvement o Chapter 2: Land Use Planning o Chapter 5: Natural Resources and Historic Areas o Chapter 6: Environmental Quality o Chapter 7: Hazards o Chapter 8: Parks, Recreation,Trails, and Open Space o Chapter 9: Economic Development o Chapter 10: Housing o Chapter 11: Public Facilities and Services o Chapter 12: Transportation o Chapter 13: Energy Conservation o Chapter 14: Urbanization • Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Tide 11 • Statewide Planning Goals o Goals 1,2, 5, 6, 7, 8,9, 10, 11, 12, 13,and 14. City Department and outside agency comment,r SECTION V. APPLICABLE CRITERIA AND COMMISSION FINDINGS CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (TITLE 18� Cha�ter 18.380: Zonin�Map and Text Amendments Chapter 18.380.020 Legislative Amendments to the Title and Map A. Legislative amendments. Legislative zoning map and text amendments shall be undertaken by means of a Type IV procedure, as governed by Section 18.309.060G F�s: The amendment to the TigaYd Comprehensive Plan establishes policies to be applied generally throughout the River Terrace Community Plan Area; and therefore, the application is being processed as a T��pe IV procedure, Legislative Amendment, as governed by Section 18.390.O60G. Chapter 18.390: Decision-Making Procedures Chapter 18.390.020. Description of Decision-Making Procedures B.4. Type IV Procedure. Type IV procedures apply to legislative matters. Legislative matters involve the creation, revision, or large-scale implementation of public policy. Type IV matters are considered initially by the Planning Commission with final decisions made by the City Council. F� The amendment to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan establishes policies to be applied generally thxoughout the City of Tigard. Therefore was reviewed under the Type N procedure as detailed in Section 18.390.060.G. In accordance with this secrion, the amendment was inirially considered by the Planning Commission with City Council making the final decision. Chapter 18.390.O60.G. Decision-rnaking considerations. The recommendation by the Commission and the decision by the Council shall be based on consideration of the STAPI�RI:PORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION CPA 2012-00002 PAGE 3 OF 17 following factors: 1. The Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines adopted under Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 197; 2. Any federal or state statutes or regulations found applicable; 3. Any applicable Metro regulations; 4. Any applicable comprehensive plan policies; and 5. Any applicable provisions of the Ciry's implementing ordinances. Findin�s: The Cominission reviewed applicable Statewide Planning Goals, Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan, the Tigard Community Development Code, and the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. As indicated pursuant to the Coininission's findings and conclusions found within this staff report the amendment is consistent with this criterion. CONCLUSION: Based on the analysis above, the Coinmission finds that the proposed amendment satisfies the applicable review criteria within the Tigard Community Development Code. CITY OF TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES: General Findin�s Finding: The City's Comprehensive Plan was adopted by the Tigard Ciry Council in 1983, and acknowledged as being in conformance with the Statewide Planning Goals by the Land Conservation and Development Departtnent (LCDC) on October 11, 1984. LCDC re- acknowledged the plan's compliance with the statewide planning goals through the Periodic Review process. Findin�: The Coinmission finds that the following Comprehensive Plan goals and policies apply to the amendment and the amendment satisfies the applicable goals and policies for the reasons stated below. During the course of public hearings, the Community Development Department and the Planning Convnission provided all interested parties opportunities to identify, either orally or in writing, any other Comprehensive Plan goals or policies that might apply to the amendment. No additional provisions were identified. Chapter 1: Citizen Involvement Goal 1.1 Provide citizens, affected agencies, and other jurisdictions the opportunity to participate in all phases of the planning process. Policy 2. The City shall de�ine and publicize an appropriate role for citizens in each phase of the land use planning process. F� The proposal has complied with all notification requirements pursuant to Chapter 18.390.060 of the Tigard Communiry Development Code. This staff report was also available seven days in advance of the hearing pursuant to Chapter 18.390.070.E.b of the Tigard Community Development Code. STAI'P REPORT'I'O THE PI.ANNING COMMISSION CPA 2012-00002 PAGE 4 OF 17 As part of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment process, public notice of the Planning Coininission and City Council public hearings was sent to the interested party list, River Terrace property owners and property owners within 500 ft. of River Terrace and published in the November 15, 2012 issue of The Times. The norice invited public input and included the phone number of a contact person to answer quesrions. The notice also included the address of the Ciry's webpage where the entire draft of the proposed amendment could be viewed. Policy 3. The City shall establish special citizen advisory boards and committees to provide input to the City Council, Planning Commission, and City staff. Findin�s�. The West Bull Mt. Concept Planning recommendations were endorsed by both the project's steering coinmittee and technical advisory committee. These groups included community stakeholders, property owners and jurisdicrional partners. Policy 5. The opportunities for citizen involvement provided by the City shall be appropriate to the scale of the planning effort and shall involve a broad cross-section of the communiry. Fin� As outlined above, the community was given notice and opportunity to get information and get tesrify. Goa11.2 Ensure all citizens have access to: A, opportunities to communicate directly to the City; and B. information on issues in an understandable form. Policy 1. The City shall ensure pertinent information is readily accessible to the communiry and presented in such a manner that even technical information is easy to understand. Findines: Informarion xegarding the topics included in this Comprehensive Plan Amendment was available in multiple locations in an understandable format for the duration of the process. This included papex and electronic copies that were available in the permit center and also on the website. Policy 2. The City shall utilize such communication methods as mailings, posters, newsletters, the internet, and any other available media to promote citizen involvement and continue to evaluate the effectiveness of inethods used. Findin�s: Informarion was distributed thYOUghout the process via the City's website and direct mailings to property owners in the River Terrace area and all property owners within 500 ft. of the area. Policy 5. The City shall seek citizen participation and input through collaboration with community organizations, interest groups, and individuals in addition to City sponsored boards and committees. Findin��s: The West Bull Mt. Concept Planning recommendations were endorsed by both the project's steering coinmittee and technical advisory cominittee. These groups included community stakeholders, property owners and jurisdictional partners. STAFP ItEPORT"I'O THE PLANNING COI�iMISSION C'PA 2Q12-O0002 PAGE 5 nF 17 Chapter 2: Land Use Planning Goal 2.1 Maintain an up-to-date Comprehensive Plan, implementing regulations and action plans as the legislative basis of Tigard's land use planning program. Policy 1: The City's land use program shall establish a clear policy direction, comply with state and regional requirements, and serve its citizens' own interests. Findines: The amendment rcfines thc general policy direcrion related to Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goal 14: Urbanization for completion of the communiry plan and subsequent development of the River Terrace Area. The policy statements are clear and serve the interests of the citizens. The city coordinated the development of the proposed polices with the Oregon Department of Transportation, the Department of Land Conservation and Development, and Metro to ensure compliance with state and regional requirements. Policy 2: The City's land use regulations, related plans, and implementing actions shall be consistent with and implement its Comprehensive Plan. Findin��s: The amendment refines the general policy direction related to Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goal 14: Urbanization for completion of the community plan and subsequent development of the River Terrace Area. It also applies comprehensive plan designations to the River Terrace Area that are based on the West Bull Mt. Concept Plan recommended land uses. Both will be used to guide the application of Tigard zoning and regulations to the area that will be consistent with the comprehensive plan. Policy 3. The City shall coordinate the adoption, amendment, and implementation of its land use program with other potentially affected jurisdictions and agencies. Findings: The Ciry sent out request for comments on the proposed amendment to all potentially affected jurisdictions and agencies. All were given 14 days to respond. Any comments that were received are addressed in Section VII: Outside Agency Comments of this Staff Report. Additionally, Metro, the Oregon Department of Transportation, and the Department of Land Conservation and Development staff provided input throughout the development of the proposed amendment. Policy 20. The Ciry shall periodically review and if necessary update its Comprehensive Plan and regulatoty maps and implementing measures to ensure they are current and responsive to community needs, provide reliable information, and conform to applicable state law, administrative rules, and regional requirements. Findin� The proposed amendment will update the Tigard Comprehensive Plan map and policies to prepare for the future development of the River Terrace Area. The area has been brought into the urban growth boundary and a concept plan completed. The concept plan was a collaboration of many stakeholders, regulatory agencies, and local jurisdictions. The amendment will set the stage for the transformation of the concept plan into a community plan where the application of zoning and regulations will take place. The community plan will provide reliable information to make findings against applicable laws and requirements. Findings of conformance to applicable state and regional requirements for this amendment can be found in Section V of this Staff Report. STAP'P REPORT TO"I'HE P1.ANNING COMMISSION CPA 20]2-00002 PAGF,6 OF 17 Chapter 5: Natural Resources and Historic Areas Goa15.1 Protect natural resources and the environmental and ecological functions they provide and, to the extent feasible, restore natural resources to create naturally functioning systems and high levels of biodiversity. F� As discussed in the findings made for Statewide Planning Goal 5, the amendment does not alter the City's acknowledged Goal 5 inventories or land use programs. No changes will occur to current Natural Resource protections as the result of adopting the proposed amendment. The amendment does not conflict with goals and policies of this chapter of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. Chapter 6: Environmental QualitX Goa16.1 Reduce air pollution and improve air quality in the community and region. Policy 3: The City shall promote land use patterns, which reduce dependency on the automobile, are compatible with existing neighborhoods, and increase opportunities for walking, biking, and /or public transit. Findin�s: The proposed amendment designates comprehensive plan land uses based on the recommended land uses found in the concept plan. The concept plan was completed using a principle of transportation choices and connectiviry. The concept plan provided for a broad range of connected infrastructure that allowed convenient access for pedestrians, cyclists, drivers, and transit riders. It also recommended a neighborhood commercial area that is accessible by bike or foot from the neighborhoods adjacent to and within the planning area. Giving residents a variety of choices will promote the reduction of vehicle miles traveled. No transportation amendments are proposed at this time, but will be addressed during the community planning process. Chapter 7: Hazards Goa17.2 Protect people and property from flood, landslide, earthquake,wildfire, and severe weather hazards. Findin�s: The adoption of the proposed amendment has no impact on City policies or programs related to hazards. The community plan will address hazards through the application of zoning and code regulations. Chapter 8: Parks, Recreation,Trails, and Open Space Goal 8.1 Provide a wide variety of high quality park and open spaces for all residents, including both: a. developed areas with facilities for active recreation; and b. undeveloped areas for nature-oriented recreation and the protection and enhancement of valuable natural resources within the parks and open space system. S1'ArF REPOR"I'TO"I'I�E PLANNING COMASISSION �'Pn �n1�_fNlfl(l� Pr1C;F.7(�F 17 Goa18.2 Create a citywide network of interconnected on- and off-road pedestrian and bicycle trails. Findin�s: The adoption of the proposed amendment has no impact on City policies or programs related to parks, recreation, trails, and open space. The comprehensive plan map will have open space designations added with the amendment, but the city has no zoning to identify properties for these uses. Recommended locations will be finalized through the community planning process and address needed parks, trails, and opcn space. The Tigard Parks System Master Plan will be updated as part of the process and guide future city facilities. Chapter 9: Economic Development Goa19.3 Make Tigard a prosperous and desirable place to live and do business. Findin� The proposed amendment designates five acres of the River Terrace area as neighborhood commercial on the Tigard Comprehensive Plan map. The concept plan intended this commercial area to serve as a retail, mixed-use gathering place for the neighborhoods in close proximity. The overall vision of the concept plan is to create a network of multi-modal transportation improvement to promote walking and biking through the neighborhoods to access the commercial area. The concept plan stakeholders recommended this approach as opposed to auto-oriented commercial development to make the area more desirable and livable. Chapter 10: Housing Goa110.1 Provide opportunities for a variety of housing types to meet the diverse housing needs of current and future City residents. Findin�The proposed amendment designates the majoriry of land within the River Terrace area as residential on the Tigard Comprehensive Plan map, divided into low, medium, and high density. The range of comprehensive plan designations will allow for a variety of housing types on different sized lots to meet the housing needs of future residents in the area. This diversity will also allow the city to comply with Metro Title 11 requirement of 10 units/net developable acre. Tigard zoning and regulations will be applied to the area during the community planning process based on the proposed comprehensive plan designations. Chapter 11: Public Facilities and Services Goa111.1 Develop and rnaintain a stormwater system that protects development,water resources, and wildlife habitat. F� The adoption of the proposed amendment has no impact on Ciry policies or programs related to stormwater. However, the concept plan process outlined the necessary infrastructure needed to accommodate the recommended land uses. The community plan will analyze the findings of the concept plan and update stormwater needs and cost estimates as necessary. The Tigard Public Facility Plan will then be updated accordingly. S'1'AFF RI;PORT TO 7'I-IE PLANNING COMMISSION CPA 20]2-00002 PAGE 8 OP 17 Goa111.2 Secure a reliable, high qualiry,water supply to meet the existing and future needs of the community. Findin��s: The adoption of the proposed amendment has no impact on City policies or programs related to its water distribution. However, the concept plan process outlined the necessary infrastructure needed to accommodate the recommended land uses. The Tigard Water Master Plan also accounted for the recommended land uses in the River Terrace area when calculating future need. The community plan will analyze the findings of the concept plan and update water infrastructure needs and cost estimates as necessary. The Tigard Public Facility Plan will then be updated accordingly. Goa111.3 Develop and rnaintain a wastewater collection system that meets the existing and future needs of the community. F�s: The adoption of the proposed amendment has no impact on City policies or programs related to wastewater collecrion. However, the concept plan process outlined the necessary infrastructure needed to accommodate the recommended land uses. Clean Water Services is currently updating its regional collection model and these results will be incorporated into the communiry planning process. The community plan will analyze the findings of the concept plan and update water infrastructure needs and cost estimates as necessary. The Tigard Public Facility Plan will then be updated accordingly. Chapter 12: Transportation Goa112.1 Develop mutually supportive land use and transportation plans to enhance the livabiliry of the community. Goal 12.2 Develop and maintain a transportation system for the efficient movement of people and goods. Goa112.3 Provide and accessible, multi-modal transportation system that meets the mobility needs of the community. FindinQS: The proposed amendment is consistent with these goals. The comprehensive land use designations were developed through the concept planning process, which took into account the transportation impacts of the recommended land uses.Although no transportation improvements are proposed to be adopted at this time, the community planning process will analyze and refine the transportation proposals to support the zoning applied in the process. The concept plan was also completed using a principle of transportation choices and connectivity. The concept plan provided for a broad range of connected infrastructure that allowed convenient access for pedestrians, cyclists, drivers, and transit riders. The community planning process will incorporate findings and infrastructure needs into the Tigard 2035 Transportation System Plan and address the State's Transportation Planning Rule as required. The Tigard Public Facility Plan will then be updated accordingly. STArF RF_PORT"I'O'fl-Ii.PLANNING CO,'biMISSION ��nn �m2ruxx» PAC',F.9(�F 17 Chapter 13: Energy Conservation Goa113.1 Reduce energy consumption. Policy 1: The Ciry shall promote the reduction of energy consumption associated with vehicle miles traveled through: A. land use patterns that reduce dependency on the automobile; B. public transit that is reliable, connected, and efficient; and C. bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure that is safe and well connected. Findin�s: The proposed amendment designates comprehensive plan land uses based on the recommended land uses found in the concept plan. The concept plan was completed using a principle of transportation choices and connectivity. The concept plan provided for a broad range of connected infYastructure that allowed convenient access for pedestrians, cyclists, drivers, and transit riders. It also recommended a neighborhood commercial area that is accessible by bike or foot from the neighborhoods adjacent to and within the planning area. Giving residents a variety of choices will promote the reduction of vehicle miles traveled. No transportation amendments are proposed at this time, but will be addressed during the community planning process. Chapter 14: Urbanization Goa114.1 Provide and/or coordinate the full range of urban level services to lands and citizens within the Tigard City Limits. Findings: The proposed amendment adopts tlie recommended land uses from the concept plan into the Tigard Comprehensive Plan map. This is the first step of the pxocess to plan for the pYOVision of urban level services to the River Texrace area, which will be served by the city of Tigard. This amendment does not address the full range of services needed for the area, this will take place during the community planning process. The result will be an updated public facility plan and an infrastructure financing strategy for the future development of the area. Goa114.2 Promote Tigard citizens' interests in urban growth boundary expansion and other regional and state growth management decisions. F� The proposed amendment is consistent with this policy as this is the first step in completing the RiveY Terrace Community Plan for areas brought within the urban growth boundary. The city will be the service provider for the area and complering the community plan is in Tigard citizens'interest. CONCLUSION: Based on the analysis above, the Coininission fmds that the pYOposed amendment satisfies the applicable goals and policies contained in the City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan. METRO URBAN GROWTH MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONAL PLAN TITLE 11 Findin�s: The Regional FYamework Plan calls for long-range planning to ensure that areas brought into the UGB are uxbanized efficiently and become or contribute to mixed-use,walkable, transit friendly communities. It is the purpose of Title 11 to guide such long-range planning for S'TAFF I2EPORT'TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION CPA 2012-00002 PAGE 10 OP 17 urban reserves and areas added to the UGB. It is also the purpose of Title 11 to provide interim protection for areas added to the UGB until city or county amendments to land use regulations to allow urbanization become applicable to the areas. The proposed amendment will update the Tigard Comprehensive Plan map and policies to prepare for the future development of the River Terrace Area. The area has been brought into the urban growth boundary (Areas 63 and 64 in 2002; Roy Rogers West in 2011) and a concept plan completed. The concept plan was a collaboration of many stakeholders, regulatory agencies, and local jurisdicrions. The amendment will set the stage for the transformarion of the concept plan into a community plan where the application of zoning and regulations will take place. The community plan will provide reliable information to make findings against all requirements of Tide 11. The concept plan made findings against Tide 11 (those in place in 2007) and found the work to be in compliance related to requirements for a concept plan. This included the requirement of average residential densities of at least 10 units per net residential acre. The concept plan averaged 10.7 units per net residential acre in Areas 63 and 64 (216 acres and 2,311units). The 2011 urban growth boundary expansion included in this proposed amendment (Roy Rogers West) is subject to updated Tide 11 rules. The new rules require a zoned capacity for a number and type of housing unit for new areas added to the UGB. Roy Rogers West required zoned capacity for a minimum of 479 dwelling units dispersed in the area or adjoining Areas 63 and 64. The proposed land uses will achieve the target through application of various city zoning districts that meet the criteria for low and medium density residential designations (1 to 12 units/acre). The flexibility afforded the city during the community planning process will ensure compliance with Tide 11. The proposed amendment also meets the requirements for sufficient commercial services, inventory of and protection plan for natural resources, and a conceptual school plan. Each of the three is shown with a Tigaxd Comprehensive Plan map designation. The commercial area will provide basic services for the area. The open spaces coincide with Clean Water Services setback requirements and the school district owns the properry designated as public institution and anticipates the development of a school once enough homes have been built to support it. The proposed amendment also sets policy direction consistent with Tide 11 for interim protection of areas added to the UGB. The city will not allow urban level development of the area until the community plan is complete and compliance with all regional and state requirements are confirmed. The proposed amendment is a first step to set expectations for the community planning process. The concept plan found compliance with Title 11 requirements and the community plan will be required to do the same. The city worked with Metro, the Oregon Departrnent of Transportation and Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development staffs to ensure their concems were addressed for the proposed amendments. They were provided the opportunity to review and comment on all work leading up to the document proposed for adoption. The proposed amendment (CPA2012-00002) adopts the West Bull Mt. Concept Plan recommended land uses into the Tigard Comprehensive Plan map and adds policies to prepare for the future development of the River Terrace Area. The area has been brought into the urban growth boundary and a concept plan completed. It will set the stage for the transformation of the concept plan into a community plan where t11e application of zoning and regulations will take ST��FI�Rf:PORT 1'O"I'I II:PLANNING COMMISSION rnn �m�_rxuun PAC;� ii �lFi� place. The community plan will provide reliable information to make final findings against applicable laws and requirements. The proposed amendment is consistent Tide 11. CONCLUSION: Based on thc analysis above, the Commission fmds that the proposed amendment is consistent with the Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Tide 11. THE STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS AND GUIDELINES ADOPTED UNDER OREGON REVISED STATUTES CHAPTER 197 Statewide Planning Goal1—Citizen Involvement.• This goal outlines the citizen involvement requirement for adoption of Comprehensive Plans and changes to the Comptehensive Plan and implementing documents. FindinQS: This goal was met as the proposal has complied with all notification requirements pursuant to Chapter 18.390.060 of the Tigard Community Development Code. This staff report was also available seven days in advance of the hearing pursuant to Chapter 18.390.070.E.b of the Tigard Communiry Development Code. 11s part of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment process, public notice of the Planning Coininission and City Council public hearings was sent to the interested parties list, property owners in the area and within 500 ft. and published in the November 15, 2012 issue of The Tunes (in accordance with Tigard Development Code Chapter 18.390). The notice invited public input and included the phone number of a contact person to answer questions. The notice also included the address of the City's webpage where the entire draft of the text changes could be viewed. Statewide Planning Goa12—Land Use Alant�ing.• This goal outlines the land use planning process and policy framework. The Comprehensive Plan was acknowledged by DLCD as being consistent with the statewide planning goals. Findin� The amendment to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan is being undertaken to update the City's acknowledged Comprehensive Plan in a manner consistent with current conditions and citizen values. The amendment to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan is being processed as a Type IV procedure, which requires any applicable statewide planning goals, federal or state statutes or regulations, Metro regulations, comprehensive plan policies, and City's implementing ordinances, be addressed as part of the decision-making process. All noticing requirements have been met. All applicable review criteria have been addressed within this staff report; therefore, the requirements of Goal 2 have been met. Statewide Planning Goal5—Natural Resources This goal requires the inventory and protection of natural resources, open spaces, historic areas and sites. F� The City is currendy in compliance with the State's Goal 5 program and Metro's Tide 13: Nature in Neighborhoods program, which implements Goal 5. The amendment does not alter the City's acknowledged Goal 5 inventories or land use programs. No changes will occur to current natural resource protections. As a result, the amendment to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan is in compliance with Goal 5 process requirements. S'TAFF KI:POR'T TO THE PI.ANNING COMMISSION CPA 2012-00002 PAGE 12 OF 17 Statewide Alanning Goa16.•Air, Water, and Land Resources Qualrty To maintain and improve the qualiry of the air,water, and land resources of the state. F�s: The City is currently in compliance with Metro's Tide 3: Water Quality and Flood Management program, which unplements Goal 6. The amendment does not alter the City's acknowledged land use programs regarding water qualiry and flood management protections. As a result, the amendment to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan is in compliance with Goa16. Statewide Planning Goa17—Areas Subject to Natural Hazards To protect people and properry from natural hazards. Findin�s: The City is currendy in compliance with Metro's Tide 3: Water Quality and Flood Management program, which implements Goal 7. The amendment does not alter the City's acknowledged land use programs regarding water quality and flood management protections. The City is currently a participant in the National Flood Insurance Program administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The amendment does not alter the City's participation. As a result, the amendment to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan is in compliance with Goa17. Statewide Planning Goa18—Recreatronal Needs This goal requires the satisfaction of the recreational needs of the citizens of the state and visitors and,where appropriate, to provide for the siting of necessary recreational facilities including destination resorts. Findines: The Ciry is currently in compliance with Statewide Planning Goal 8. The amendment does not alter the City's acknowledged Goal S policies or land use programs. As a result, the amendment to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan is in compliance with Goal 8. Statewide Planning Goa19.•Economic Development To provide adequate opportunities throughout the state for a variery of economic activities vital to the health,welfare, and prosperity of Oregon's citizens. Findines: The City is currendy in compliance with Goal 9 and Metrds Tide 4: Industrial and Other Employment Areas through its acknowledged Comprehensive Plan. The amendment does not alter the City's acknowledged Goal 9 policies or land use programs. As a result, the amendment to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan is in compliance with Goal 9. Statewide Planning Goa110.•Housing To provide adequate housing for the needs of the community, region and state. Findines: The City is currendy in compliance with Goal 10 and the Metropolitan Housing Rule (OAR 660-007/Division 7), and Metro's Title 1: Housing Capacity, and Tide 7: Housing Choice. The City is currendy under periodic review and performing a Goal 10 analysis,which includes the River Terrace area. The adoprion of the amendment does not alter the City's compliance with Goal 10 as the addition of the recommended land uses in the River Terrace area is consistent with state and regional housing requirements. The amendment to the Comprehensive Plan is in compliance with Goal 10. Statewide Planning Goa11L•Public Facilities and Setvices To plan and develop a timely, orderly and efficient arrangement of public facilities and services to serve as a framework for urban and rural development. S'1'.AFF REPORT'TO THE PLANNING COI�IMISSION �n e �n��nnnn� PAC:F 1't(1R 17 Findings: The City is currendy in compliance with Goal 11 through its acknowledged Comprehensive Plan. This includes an adopted Public Facility Plan as required by Oregon Revised Statute 197.712 and Oregon Administrative Rule 660-011. The amendment does not alter the City's acknowledged Goal 11 policies or plans. However, as part of the River Terrace Community Plan process, the Public Facility Plan will be updated to account for the recommended land uses and future development of the axea, including a financing strategy. As a result, the amendment to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan is in compliance with Goal 11. Statewide Planning Goa112.• Transportation To provide and encourage a safe, convenient, and economic transportation system. Findin�s: The Ciry is currently in compliance with Goal 12 and Metro's Regional Transportation Plan through its acknowledged CompYehensive Plan and Transportation System Plan as required by Oregon Administrarive Rule 660-012 (Transportation Planning Rule). The amendment adopts the recommended land uses from the West Bull Mt. Concept Plan into the Tigard Comprehensive Plan map. The amendment also includes a policy to not allow development of the area until a full TPR analysis is complete. The River Terrace Community Plan process will make findings against the TPR based on the land uses proposed. As a result, the amendment to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan is in compliance with Goal 12. Statewide Plannir�g Goa113:Energy Conservation Land and uses developed on the land shall be managed and controlled so as to maximize the conservation of all fortns of energy, based on sound economic principles. Findin�s: The City is currendy in compliance with Goal 13 through its acknowledged Comprehensive Plan. The amendment does not alter the City's compliance with Goal 13. As a result, the amendment to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan is in compliance with Goal 13. Statewide Planning Goa114.• Urbanization To provide for an orderly and efficient transition form rural to urban land use, to accommodate urban population and urban employment inside urban growth boundaries, to ensure efficient use of land, and to provide for livable communities. F� The City is currently in compliance with Goal 14 and Metro's Title 11: Planning for New Urban Areas through its acknowledged Comprehensive Plan and land use regulations. The City also has a signed Urban Planning Area Agreement and Urban Services Agreement as required by ORS 195.065 and ORS 197. The proposed amendment will update the Tigard Comprehensive Plan map and policies to prepare for the future development of the River Terrace Area. The area has been bxought into the urban growth boundary (Areas 63 and 64 in 2002; Roy Rogers West in 2011) and a concept plan completed. The concept plan was a collaboration of many stakeholders, regulatory agencies, and local jurisdictions. The amendment will set the stage for the transformation of the concept plan into a communiry plan where the applicarion of zoning and regulations will take place. The community plan will provide reliable information to make findings against all requirements of Tide 11. The proposed amendment is a first step to set expectations for the community planning process. The concept plan found compliance with Tide 11 requirements and the community plan will be required to do the same. The city worked with Metro, the Oregon Department of Transportation and Oregon Department of Land Conservarion and Development staffs to ensure their concerns STAI'F REPORT TO'THE PI.ANNING COMMISSION CPA 2012-00002 PAGE 14 OF 17 were addressed for the proposed amendments. They were provided the opportunity to review and comment on all work leading up to the document proposed for adoption. The adoption of the proposed amendment (CPA2012-00002) does not alter the City's compliance with Goal 14. The amendment is consistent with this goal. CONCLUSION: Based on the analysis above, the Commission fmds that the proposed amendment is consistent with the applicable Statewide Planning Goals. SECTION VI. ADDITIONAL CITY STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard's Community Development Department, Administrative Department, Finance Department, Public Works Department, and Police Department have had an opportunity to review this proposal and have no objecrions. CONCLUSION: Based on no comment from City staff, staff finds the proposed amendment does not interfere with the best interests of the City. SECTION VII. OUTSIDE AGENCY COMMENTS The following agencies/jurisdictions had an opportunity to review this proposal and did not respond: Ciry of King Ciry City of Tualatin Clean Water Services Metro Land Use and Planning Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development Oregon Depattment of Ttansportation, Region 1 Oregon Department of Transportation, Region 1, District 2A Tualatin Hill Parks and Recreation District Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Tualatin Valley Water District The following agencies/jurisdictions had an o portunity to review this proposal and sent in comments that are found as Attachments 1 and � Ciry of Beaverton Washington Counry, Department of Land Use and Transpottation Fi� Washington County was supportive of the proposed amendment and recommended also adopting other elements of the West Bull Mt. Concept Plan, such as parks, trails and street classifications. The city is proposing this amendment as a first step in completing the required community plan for the area. The aforementioned elements will be reviewed and refined as necessary during the process and incorporated into the respective city master plans. The proposed amendment is in compliance with state and regional requirements. Updated master plans will be adopted during the community planning process and will ensure continued compliance with state and regional requirements. Staff recommends no changes to the proposed amendment based on the Washington County comments. S'I'AFI�1tLPOR'I'TO"I'HE PLANNING COMMISSION ��1�A 2m 2-no�n2 PAGE�5 OF�7 The ciry of Beaverton recommended adding policies that addressed the importance of coordination among the two cities and other agency partners and developing cooperative agreements for phasing of improvements along the boundary of River Terrace and South Cooper Mountain community plan areas. The ciry of Tigard acknowledges the unportance of coordinarion during the planning process and has been in frequent discussions with agency parmers. It is unportant and inherent in any large planning process. Tigard has convened the concept plan technical advisory committee to ensure information is being shared throughout the planning process. Tigard has also met with Beaverton staff a number of times and will continue to do so throughout the process. The ciry of Tigard has acknowledged the importance of coordination by several adopted policies currendy in the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. Some examples include Policy 2.1.3, Policy 5.1.4, Policy 6.2.2,Policy 7.1.3, Policy 11.1.2,Policy 11.3.2, Policy 12.5.1 and Policy 12.5.3. Tigard is in full support of coordination of planning efforts. The city's River Terrace Community Plan work program has included the importance of coordination, as has the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends no changes to the proposed amendment based on the Washington County comments. CONCLUSION: Based on responses from outside agencies listed above, the Commission finds the proposed amendment meets all requirements of these agencies and is consistent with the best interests of the Ciry. SECTION VIII. CONCLUSION The proposed changes comply with the applicable Statewide Planning Goals, applicable regional, state and federal regulations, t�e Tigard Comprehensive Plan, and applicable provisions of the City's implementing ordinances. Therefore, Staff recommends that the Planning Comtnission recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Tigard City Council as determuled through the public hearing process. ATTACHMENT: ATTACHMENT 1: CITY OF BEAVERTON COMMENTS ATTACHMENT 2: WASHINGTON COUNTY COMMENTS EXHIBIT A: PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. STAFF RE]'ORT'I'O THE PLANNING CO;�i�'vfISSION CPA 2012-00002 PAGE iG OF]7 /� i � _��c''`_--- November 26,2012 PREPARED BY: Darren Wyss DATE Senior Planner r ,�' , . � . �, �`r r>' �''' ,, /�i c: �C l t,,'� November 26,2012 APPROVED BY: T'orri McGuire DATE Interim Community Development Director STAFF RF.PORT TO"I'I-IE PLr1NN1NG COMhIISSION rnA �m�_nnnm PAGE 17 OF 17 �, ; , �� ea�erfian 0 R L G O N C;�mmuni�y �nd Economie D�v�lopm�nt November 21, 2012 Darren Wyss,Senior Planner , City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 V RE; Comments for Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA}2012-00002—Adopt West Bull MT Concept Ptan Recommended Land Uses and Associated Policies Dear Mr, Wyss: The City of Beaverton has reviewed the proposed Tigard Comprehensive Plan Text Changes and offers the comments listed below. As you know, the City of Beaverton is preparing to launch a public planning process for the South Cooper Mountain area located just north of SW Scholls Ferry Road and SW 175`h. Approximately 544 acres of what is also known as Urban Reserve Area (URA) 6B was added to the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) in October 2011. One of the condltions Metro placed on the UGB expansion requires the Clty of Beaverton to prepare a concept plan for the entirety of URA &e (1,776 acres) as well as a community plan and corresponding comprehensive plan provisions and land use regulations for that portion of South Cooper Mountain now in the UGB. The C(ty Council approved annexation of this 544- acre territory on November 13, 2012. Given the numerous common transportation, sewer, water, stormwater management, natural resource, and trails and transit service issues involved in the River Terrace planning effort and 8eaverton's upcoming South Cooper Mountain project, the clty suggests that policies be added regarding inter-Jurisdictional coordination and cooperatlon as follows: • Transportation & transit: it is recommended that policies be added requiring coordination among the two cities, Washington County, Tr1Met and ODO7 to address transportation and transit, including timing of needed improvements and funding strategies and mechanlsms. • Sewer, water and stormwater mana�ement: Poiicies requiring coordination among the two cities and Clean Water Services should be added to address common sewer, water and storm water management issues. � City of Beaverton•4755 SW Griffith Drive • PO Box 4755• 12/3/12 Planning Commission Meeting Agenda Attachment 1 (1 d/s pg) • Na�tural resources: In addition, the city suggests a policy be added regarding coordination among the two cities, Metro, Tualatin Hilis Parks & Recreation District and Washington County to address protection and enhancement of natural resources in the area, provision of access to public lands and natural features, including planning for trafls and pedestrfan and bicycle travel to access these lands and features, and connect with other local and regional trails. ', • Inter�overnmental Agreements: The city recommends adding a policy regarding ; cooperative agreements among the two cities, Washington County, CWS, and other � applicable service providers to address phasing of development along SW Scholis Ferry and SW 175�h/Roy Rogers, fncluding timing of transportation sewer, water and stormwater improvements needed to support urban development in the River Terrace and South Cooper Mountafn community plan areas. The City of Beaverton believes it is critical that the two jurfsdictions coordinate particularly closely in the analysis of transportation and uti(ities, and cooperate with partner jur►sdictions and districts to find solutions to meet the chalienges we face in providing services to these urbanizing areas. It would be mutually beneficial for the cities to work together on developing financing strategies to take advantage of economies of scale and spread the costs of infrastructure over a larger area. , Thank you for the opportunity to comment on Tigard's proposed Comprehensive Pian Text Changes. We look forward to coordlnating with you as both cities move forward with their respective planning efforts. Sincerely/ /, �;� �,/ /� � ,�,��,��. � ��`�� Steven Sparks, AI Planning Manager � � WASHINGTON COUNTY f 1 OREGON � November 20, 2012 City of Tigard Planning Division Attn.: Mr. Darren Wyss, Senior Planner 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: CPA2012-0002 Dear Mr. Wyss, The county appreciates the opportunity to participate in the city's planning of River Terrace and looks forward to completion of the River Terrace plan. The county supports the adoption of the West Bull Mountain Concept Plan into the city of Tigard's Comprehensive Plan. The county would also encourage the city's Comprehensive Plan to be amended to include other elements of the Concept Plan,such as parks,trails and street classifications. Please let me know if you have any questions. I can be reached by phone at(503) 846-8817 or via e-mail at paul schaefer(a�co.washin on.or.us. Thank you :��=c�C�� %� Paul Schaefer Senior Planner T:�PLNG\WPSHARE\PAULS\WestBullMtn River Terrace\CPA2012-00002.doc Department of Land Use &Transportation . T.A114 Ranve Planninv niviaion 155 N. First Avenue, Suite 350-1� phone: (503) 846-3519 • 12/3/12 Planning Commission Meeting Agenda Attachment 2 (1 s/s pg) „ City of Tigard : CPA2012-00002 , + Proposed Tigard Comprehensive Plan Text Changes The City of Tigard proposes to amend the Goal 14: Urbanization chapter of its comprehensive plan to include the policies below. The policies will be located under existing Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goal 14.3. The policies are intended to provide guidance during the prepararion and after adoption of the River Terrace Community Plan. 5. 1�letro brought areas known as Area 63,Area 64 and Roy Rogers West Area within the Urban Growth Boundary. These areas are known as the River Terrace Community Planning area. The City of Tigard shall be the designated service provider for the area. 6. The City shall prepare and adopt a River Tcrracc Community Plan for the area. The basis for the River Terrace Community Plan shall be the land use designations from the West Bull Mountain Concept Plan. Refinements to the West Bull Mountain Concept Plan shall be considered during the public planning process for the River Terrace Community Plan. 7. The City shall idenrify appropriate urban zoning districts and regulations as part of the River Terrace Community Plan,which shall comply with the Statewide Planning Goals and the Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan. 8. The City shall defer land use and zoning decisions within the area to Washington County, as outlined in the Intergovernmental Agreement dated Apri124, 2012, until the River Terrace Community Plan is adopted. 9. If all areas are not annexed by the City by the time the River Terrace Community Plan is adopted, the City shall seek an amendment to the Intergovernmental Agreement of Apri124,2012 transferring land use and zoning responsibiliry for the River Terrace Community Planning area, including unincorporated areas, to the City. 10. Once the River Terrace Communiry Plan is adopted, and upon annexation to the City,urban zoning districts shall be adopted for these areas. If unincorporated areas remain, rural zoning shall be retained for these areas. 11. The City shall prepare a public facilities plan and an infrastructure fmancing plan as part of the River Terrace Community Plan. 12. No applicarion of City zoning or development shall be approved by the city within the River Terrace Community Plan Area until such time as a full analysis under the Transportation Planning Rule ('I'PR) (OAR 660-012-0060),which shall include a transportation funding strategy prepared in coordination with Washington County, has been completed and approved for the River Terrace Community Plan Area by the City. The funding strategy should identify transportation 12/3/12 Planning Commission Meeting Exhibit A to Agenda Attachment 2 improvements proposed to resolve transportation system impacts generated by development of the River Terrace Community Area, the responsible party for constructing improvements, their associated cost estimates and public and/or private funding sources,including sources that may be specified by any applicable memoranda of understanding or development agreement. If the funding strategy includes transportation Supplemental Development Charges,it should identify the process � and tiining for their approval and implementation. //�rl� �. ,�1/LR�JII� r/� � � � � • � ' . � " • , • � � C T�caan � � � � � � � /�fl �� ',� �� , I �.' � _ ;� d s+ ' � — . , . N •� � � � ' "' 'll � ' �� i � ru ' - � �� i 1 elH� _ � .•• -. � - • . • � , ` , �� p'� : • . • • � ' 1� • �- il ■■ , ► � �� '��1 � -. �- _ - � � ■ —�It� 1 . �- �� _� � nr � i � '� � � �n �iu `��' - . .. ... . - ' !s .�� — �t`J ; � ��- �� . � �E= t ■ '�' � �! � � �� ' • • 1 1/ ��fl i�'S'� ■ � � • - _ � ! � � � .. . :. ._ �� i �� • i �' •� .. . :. .. , ►� ■ ; . :. .. ; ;�� '//%. ..- �n� —� . � � u��r � � � � : ��u�n �� r� � U�IIif 11 �_ � ( � � t�1� ��I� �� _ � �I • �� 11�� f�� p�t� � � •�� i�'�' �J.SZ�•s:�• '� � , I�It1111 � ►� l� I�I_1. ■.. ■■�� f �� I�� N � C��CI � '� ' � �� i► •�. ` � _ r��ni '=i�� , � � � � / � I � - �` � �u % ' � ♦ �_ � �, �l�\N�� , �� N �i��i' J'1. �s 1C �\ � /�1►�' i `¢� N� \I�� " � ��=i i�f►•� �� ' ��NI , �� ■ s��`��/■ �3� ' U':�■ � , , , c� A , � � �� .� ■�:.� P�rkins Coi� nZO N.W.Couch Street,Tenth Floor Portland,OR 972og-4�z8 Michael C.Robinson PHONE:50j.]2].2000 eHOr+e:(503)727-2264 Fnx: o . z .zz�z S 37 7 F�x: (503)346-2264 www.perkinscoie.com eM�iL: MRobinson@perkinscoie.com December 3, 2012 VIA E-MAIL Mr. Tom Anderson, President City of Tigard Planning Commission City of Tigard City Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: City of Tigard File No. CPA 2012-00002; River Terrace Comprehensive Plan Map and Text Amendments Dear President Anderson and Members of the Tigard Planning Commission: I represent West Hills Development Company ("West Hills"). I am writing on behalf of West Hills concerning the proposed River Terrace Comprehensive Plan map and text amendments. By adopting these comprehensive plan amendments now, the City of Tigard is setting the stage for the adoption of the River Terrace Community Plan and implementing land use regulations. West Hills very much appreciates the City's wark on these amendments because West Hills is ready to develop its properties in the River Terrace azea. The proposed map and text amendments, while setting the stage for the River Terrace Community Plan and implementing land use regulations, will not allow urban development in the River Terrace area until such time as the Community Plan, including land use regulations, is adopted. Therefore, while proposed Comprehensive Plan Goal 14.3, Policy 6, provides that the proposed land use designations will be the basis for the Community Plan and that refinements to the map amendments "shall be considered during the public planning process for the River Terrace Community Plan," West Hills would like the Planning Commission to know that it will be important to adopt some refinements.to the land use designation. While there may be other refinements, a significant refinement will be the location and size of the proposed open space designation in River Terrace. 37165-0000/LEGAL25281644.1 ANCHORAGE � BEIIING � BEILEVUE • BOISE • CHICAGO � DALLAS • DENVER • LOS ANGELES � MADISON � NEW VORK PALO ALTO • PHOENIX � PORTLAND • SAN DIEGO � SAN fRANC15C0 • SEATTLE • SHANGHAI • WASHINGTON, D.C. Perkins Coie��a Mr. Tom Anderson, President City of Tigard Planning Commission December 3, 2012 Page 2 I have asked Senior Planner Darren Wyss to place this letter before you at tonight's public hearing and to provide me with written notice of the City Council's decision on these amendments. Very truly yours, � c Michael C. Robinson MCR:cfr Cc: Mr. Wally Remmers (via email) Mr. Dan Grimberg (via email) Mr. Tom Brian (via email) Mr. Darren Wyss(via email) 37165-0000/LEG AL25281644.I Print Agenda Item Summary http://agendas.tigar' °.gov/print_a�memo.cfm?seq=1062&rev_nu... .�i�-io�2 4. Workshop Meeting 1�leeting Date: 11/20/2012 Length(in 45;�linutes minutes�: ��genda Title: River Terrace Community Plan Bxie&ng Submitted By: Darren Wyss,Community Development Item Type: Update,Discussion,Direct Staff �feeting Type: Council Workshop Mtg. Public Hearing Newspapex Legal .�d Requixed?: No Public Hearing Publication Date in Newspaper: Information ISSUE Staff will update the council on pxoject work program and the pxoposed adoption of West Bull Mt.Concept Plan land uses ST�1FF RECOMMEND��TION /�1CTION REQUEST Council is requested to receive a briefing from staff,ask questions and provide input as desired. KEY F1�CTS�1ND INFOR�'�1��TION SU:�fI��RY The city has agreed via an intergovernmental agxeement(IG�1)with Washington County to xefine its West Bull Mt.Concept Plan into the River Terrace Community Plan.The community plan will put into place a means to implement the vision of the concept plan through zorung,development code regulations and other measures that will make urban development possible.The process will also include updates to uulity,parks and transportauon master plans,including financial strategies necessary to fund and maintain requixed infrastructure improvements. City staff have developed a work program (see 1-lttachment 1) to guide the project through completion.This will include a lot of technical work to ensure the community plan meets the state and regional planning xequirements as well a public involvement plan to engage stakeholders in any necessaxy refinements to the concept plan as the process moves forward. Staff anucipates completion of the River Terrace Communiry Plan in summer 2014(see��ttachment 2). The first decision city council will be asked to make is to adopt the concept plan xecommended land uses (see.�ttachment 3)into the Tigard Comprehensive Plan(Task 2 in the work program).This action will set expectarions for the communiry planning process,as well as allowing the city to access a portion of the CET funds from Metro that were given to the ciry through the IG�-1 with Washington County..�number of policies will also be recommended for adoption to guide regulation of the River Terrace area during and after completion of the community planning process (see�-lttachment 4).These recommended land uses will be analyzed as paxt of the community planning process and if there are needed refinements,recommended changes will be brought back before city council for adoption at the end of the process.The Tigard Planning Commission has been briefed on this proposed amendment and a public hearing has been scheduled for December 3,2012 fox a recommendation to city council. The city council hearing is scheduled for December 11,2012. The city has begun work on a few tasks included in the work program.These include:a tree grove inventory and an Economic, Social,Environment and Energy analysis (ESEE) for both the tree grove inventory and the local wetland inventory previously completed during the concept planning process;an initial meeting of the technical advisory committee;and a community kick-off meeting held on October 24,2012.The kick-off ineeting was well attended(47 signed in and estimated 70 total participants)and overall the conversations and comments regarding the concept plan were posiave. Individuals had specific topics they wanted addressed in the commuiuty plan,but there was no organized opposition to any particular recommendations.The most popular comment was wanting the community planning process completed as soon as possible. OTHER��LTERN�TIVES N/11 COUNCIL OR CCD.-1 GO.�LS,POLICIES,�1��STER PL�1NS 1 of 2 11/20/2012 3:06 PM Print Agenda Item Summary http://agendas.tigard-�r�ov/print_ag_memo.cfrn?seq=1062&rev_nu... 1.Take the Next Step on l�fajor Projects D�1TES OF PREVIOUS CONSIDER�3TION Project Update-May 15,2012 Project Update-Septembex 18,2012 Fiscal Impact Cost: $134,000 Budgeted(yes or no): Yes Whexe Budgeted CD (department/program): l�dditional Fiscal Notes: Washington County transferred CET funds to the ciry for completing the community plan.Metso administers these funds and will require the completion of tasks before releasing funds. ��ttachments .lttachment 1 -River Terrace Community Plan Draft Work Program 1lttachment 2-General Timeframe-River Terrace Communiry Plan 1�ttachment 3-Proposed Comprehensive Plan Designations zlttachment 4-Proposed T�ard Compxehensive Plan Text Chanees 2 of2 11/20/2012 3:06 PM . , p River Terrace Community Plan ' ` . Work Program - DRAFT . .. , � November 6, 2012 Tigard will bc responsible for preparing a communin' plan for the River Terrace area. The planning area will include all propern�within the urban growth boundary (Areas 63,64& Roy Rogers��'est) that was included in the\Y'est Bull 111t. Concept Plan completed by\�'ashington County in 2010. The communin� planning effort will refine the concept plan recommendations into adopted land use regulatioris, public infrastructure plans and financing strategies for the area. Task 1: Public In�rol�-ement ■ Prepare and e�ecute a public invohement plan that outlines appropriate communicauon and outreach tools,as��ell as appointed ad�>isory coininittees and communin�meerings. ■ Form technical adeisory committee of partner agency staff to provide feedback and direction,inform proposed policy and re��iew regulaton' and financing components. SuUcominittees will be formed for each infrastructure task. ■ Form council appointed stakeholder�vorking group,including members of the concept plan group as well as other interested indi�-iduals, properri� owners and stakeholders. The group �vill ad�-ise staff on general direcuon of the project. ■ 5chedule,hold and document four communin' meetings. ■ Present recommended public im-ol�-ement plan to the Tigard Committee for Ciuzen Im�olvement for adopuon I�1aj�r Products: ■ :ldopted Public Involvement Plan ■ :�ppointment of'T,�C and S�Y'G ■ Schedule of Communin�I�leeungs � '1'imcliile: ■ September 2012—)uly 2014 (ongoing) '1"ask 2: l�dopt Wcst Bull 1�7t. Conce�t Plan ■ Preplre comprehensive plan amendment to adopt concept plan recommended laiid uses aiid associated Goal 14 policies into Tigard Comprehensive Plan. ■ Schedulc and hold Planning Coinmission work session and public hearing. ■ tichedule and hold Cin�Couiicil work session and �ublic hearin�;. ■ Prepare and distribute reyuired public notices ]�lajor Products: ■ l�mendment Package: maps, policies, staff report and notices ■ .'�dopted Updated Comprchensi��c Plan �1ap and Goal 14 Chapter '1'imeline: ■ October 2012—December 2012 Task 3: Goal 5 Natural Resources ■ Conduct inti-entor�� and assrssment uf tree gr��-es �reater than two acres. ■ Prepare ESEE anal}'sis for tree gro��e inventon' and local wedand in�-entor�� conducted as part of the concept planning process and adopted b}'the State of Oregon. ■ Prepare comprehensive plan amendment to update Significant Tree Grove I�'Iap and adopt associated ESEF, analvsis. • Prepare comprehensive plan amendment to adopt local wedand inventon� and associated ESEE analysis and update�Y'edands and Str�am Corridors �Tap. ■ Prepare comprehensive plan amendment to update Significant Habitat Map based on Tualaun Basin Partners habitat analysis performed as part of the 1�letro Nature in Neighborhood Program. �fajor Products: ■ Tree Grove Imrentory and��ssessment ■ ESEE:�nal��sis ■ .�dopted Lpdated 111aps (Significant Tree Groves, Significant Habitat,�\'etlands and Stream Corridors) Timeline: ■ October 2012—)uly 2013 Task 4: Comprehensi��e Plan/"l.c�nin� l�1aPs and Re�,ularions ■ Conduct rcview of concept plan assuinpuons and anal5�sis,including buildable land in�-entor�� and recommcnded densities to ensure tar�et of 10 units/acre. ■ Refine concept plan recommcnded densities and locations into"I"igard Com�rchensive Plan map designations as necessary, based on reaiew and committee feedback. ■ .�ssign Tigard zoning districts to property to achieve re9uired 10 units/acre ■ Conduct analysis of"I'igard Communin�Development Code commercial and mixed-use district regulations to identif��appropriate zoning for Neighborhood Commercial area de�relopment. If no current districts are acceptable,create new regulations to be administered in River Terrace to achieve the concept plan vision. ■ Conduct analysis of current allowed uses and create code languages to address non- conforming uses once Tigard zoning is adopted. ■ Prepare comprehensiee plan amendment to update Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map and Text and Zoning Map and Text. Major PYOducts: ■ Concept Plan Land Use Analysis Report ■ Recommended'I'igard Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments ■ Recommended Tigard Zoning Map Amendments ■ Recommended Tigard Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments ■ Recommended Tigard Community Development Code Amendments, ■ Adopted Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps and Text Timeline: ■ November 2012—Jul�2014 Task 5: Trans�ortation Svstem Plan U�date ■ Conduct review of concept plan assumpuons and transportauon anal��sis and idenrify needed espansion of analysis. Expected issues for review include,but are not limited to: ■ Crash data and anal��sis on existing area roadways ■ Esisting and potential speed issues and mitigating design stratcgics ■ Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) requirements ■ Regional Transportation Functional Plan (RTFP) requirements ■ Planned new roadways and roadway extensions and connections,regarding potential issues related to grade, natural Yesources,alignment,and right of way requirements. ■ Conduct additional transportation analysis as needed and retine concept plan recommendarions. • Conduct review of ciry street cross sections and connectivit�� standards to ensure compatibilit��with Ri�rer Terrace area. ■ Recommend functional classification to proposed streets,including consistenc�with state, regional and count�� functional classification maps. ■ Update Tigard Transportation SS�stem Plan to include xecommended infrasttucture and associated anal�sis. ■ Update planning le�-el cost estimates for Rieer"1'errace transportation needs. Alajor Pxoducts: ■ Concept Plan Transportarion Analti�sis Report o Technical Memorandum: Concept Plan:�ssessment o Technical 1�Zemorandum: Updated.�nalysis o ��lternati�-e Design Concepts (if needed) o Updated Cost Estimates o Final Communin� Plan Transportauon Report ■ ��dopted Lpdated Tigard Transportarion S��stem Plan "I'imeline: ■ December 2012—March 2014 '1'ask 6: Parks I��laster Plan and SDC Update ■ Conduct re�-iew of concept plan assumprions and analysis,including park standards,data and need findings. ■ Refine concept plan recommendauons as needed based on review and to conform to "I'igard Park S��stem 1�laster Plan standards. ■ Update Tigard Park S��stem Master Plan needs analy sis to incorporate River Terrace area park needs. ■ t`pdate planning level cost esumates for River Terrace park needs. Alajor Products: ■ Concept Plan Parks Anal�•sis Report ■ .�dopted U�dated Tigard Parks S��stem Master Plan "1'imcline: ■ November 2012—)uly 2013 Task 7: Water I�laster Plan U�date ■ Conduct re�-ie�v of concept plan assumptions and anal�>sis,including demand and infrastructure findings. ■ Expand projected demand and infrastructure needs anal}'sis to include Tigard urban resen�c arcas to ensure appropriate sizing and locations for future development. ■ Refine concept plan findings and cost estimates. ■ l'pdate Tigard \�'ater S�-stem I�laster Plan to incorporate Ri�-er Terrace and urban resen=e area demand and infrastructure needs,including cost esrimates. 1�lajor Products: ■ Concept Plan��'ater.�nalysis Report ■ "1'igard Urban Reseroes Demand and Infrastructure Needs Report ■ :ldopted Updated Tigard\�'ater S��stem Master Plan '1'imclinc: ■ Novembcr 2012—July 2013 '1'ask R: Sanitar�� Se�ver �faster Plan U�date ■ Collaborate«�th Clean��'ater Sen•ices to conduct review of concept plan assumptions and analysis,including need and infrastructure findings. ■ Collaborate with Clean�X'ater Seraices to expand projected need and infrastructure analysis to include Tigard urban reserve areas to ensure appropriate sizing and locations for future development. ■ ltefine concept plan findings and cost estimates. ■ Update Sanitar5� Sewer Master Plan to incorporate River Terrace and urban reserve area infrastructure needs,including cost estimates. Major Products: ■ Concept Plan Sanitary Sewer r,nal}�sis Report ■ '1'igard Urban Resen es Infrastructure Needs Keport ■ .ldopted Updated Sanitary Sewer Master Plan 'I'imeline: ■ )anuar�' 2013—September 2013 "1'ask 9: Storm�vater l�laster Plan Update ■ Collaborate�vith Clean��'ater Seiz-ices to co�iduct re��ie�v of coiicept plan assumptioris and anal��sis,including need and infrastructure findings. ■ Collaborate with Clean��'ater Services to expand projected need and infrastructure analvsis to include Tigard urUan resen�e areas to cnsurc appropriate sizing and locations for future development. ■ 1Zefine concept plan findings and cost estimates. ■ Prc�ducc Stormwater Master Plan for Ri�-er Terrace and urban reserve area infrastructure ❑�eds,including cost estimates. Major Products: ■ Concept Plan Sanitar�� Se�ver Anal��sis Report ■ Tigard Urban Resen�es Infrastructure Needs ReJ�ort ■ .�dopted Storm�vater�laster Plan Timeline: ■ januar�� 2013—September 2013 'I'ask 10: Infrastructure Financin� Strate�,� ■ Re�-ie�� estimated infrastructurc costs and mechanisms for funding. ■ '1'ransportation ■ 1'arks ' tianitary Sewer ■ �tormwater • ��'ater ■ _��ial��ze �-arious strategies for funding infrastructure needs and recuperating planning costs, including review of sy�stem development charges, fees and special districts. ■ Develop strategy to fund improvements and maintenance • Prepare recommended Infrastructure Financing Strategy ■ Prepare recommended Fees and Charges schedule ■ Schedule and conduct City Council work sessic�ns and public hearings fvr discussion and adoption. A4ajor Products: ■ :ldopted Infrastructure Financing Strate�� ■ l�dopted Fecs and Charges "I'imeline: ianuary 2013—Jul��2014 Task 11: Public Facilit� Plan Update ■ Package infrastructure needs and estimated costs into Public Faciliri�Plan document to compl��with Statewide Planning Goal 11. ■ Prepare comprehensive plln amendment to adopt into Tigard Comprehensive Plan. ■ Schedule Planning Commission work session and public hearing. ■ Schedule Cin� Council work session and public hearing. ■ Prepare and distribute required public notices ;�lajor Products: ■ _�mendment Package: maps,policies, staff report and notices ■ .�dopted L'pdated PuUlic Facilin-Plan Timeline: • October 2013—)ul��2014 General Tuneframe - Ri��cr Terrace Communin- Plan 2012 2013 2014 Task 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr lst Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr Public Involvement/TAC/SWG Adopt WBMCP � �{ Goal 5 Natural Resources _ �. � �j Comp Plan/Zoning Maps and Regulations Transportation System Plan Update Parks Master Plan&SDC Update Water Master Plan Update ..�„�� Sanitary Sewer Plan Update '�. Stormwater Master Plan Update Infrastructure Financing 5trategy Public Facility Plan Update � � - `–y— Community Meeting � Stakeholder Working Group Meeting � City Council Hearing 1 � Technical Advisory Committee Meeting � Planning Commission Hearing ��.►.��.�:o.�_--�_ _�� -� � • � • � • � . � • . • � . ncnkn • � " � � � � � � _ � _ _....- ... --��;`: � � � .�s,�%� "°-11:'��.. ,,,.; ,..�,,,�• ° " r i°. 1:�� „ ,�� . ' N� �� -.,,_ _ �G�� _= �� ':�� 1�� = lil ' ::��°�' _ • •,� •r� , � � 1��/�� r '1 1 ��j� �� ii C��1 � ..., ..nmm um nm. �;___'_ -=��`illll • . �. ��n��i�� ►�1liiiii ��i��.��.■. _..__� •-.�_._ . ��r��_iiii�� iu i�'i!; - . .. -. �- . . . �I � �i� �:� qi ��r��. , � ►��I=�'I%� C1111111�; • . • • • ' � a��► �� \Illli C ��►��1111��1111111 • �- • ��► ��I/11111111U ■ ��1111111�!1111111111; -• �- � ��/��11= _=umlllll: - ■■■��D��11 %11111111111 • •- u �umnum� �uumuu�� ;aiii 3==U��u�� II��N► �i, - . .. ... . •�111� ■:C 111/111� 111111�//:�1 :nn ��CIIIII�.� ��.� �� p - ��!1 .�� ' •�- •. � �i i�i��f/� '`�� '��.� �� ,� � ' • • � �.�mm��m��:�•�►� � � "^ :-, �� /�,i��I ' � �,�1�1��11-�, �' � • � � " � I ��'�s��'��►/ � - •''�1��.,':.�� .. . :. .. i � '��i��►��y .. . :. ._ I �`►r� ��r`►i/ . . :. .. ;: i ��t ■�G��II� . m�= c .ummu.t %% ..- I � �� nmuum��1%I � I � . � . umuuu�■ �d ' � � � � � Il ' :�m�u�u�;�`� ��! �r n��uuuum�■ ■� ' ..u� umuu�m'.�� ';� r� � �/um� �nu�� Ie!!! a� i ; ��D III;�� I = I � � ��) �� •��L� � � � �� . ��' - '■■■�■ i �1 r�f � Ill�mm��11�� ii■� �� 1!�� 11�� _ ��,� �II�� I/ � , .....�►�1�1��i'i��il/��■./�� ► � �r��1 • ---- �� Ui�lrr �,� �► ►�� ► , u�� j��%A� � I � � �� /' ��/��'7 � . /: '' � � : � , - �� \� � ��10 � • �• : '-'-' �� `�� === `/� � ��\��/��:�� /� �� ■ ��iu • II �/■ ►�►��1��i �i JI. -j\��1►�" �� i�i . ��r.� .�i�■��► � .liw�,�♦ • .; ��uun.�� ::■�► � _ '� � � ..��► 1111!I. �1...��i ' . •�.► •.��i , 11�:■■ :.�i�■ � ■ _�r: ■• ��=:'�`/T �Illliii�,ii �� r_ .I ■ „ Ciry of Tigard • � -� CPA2012-00002 ...�r � �: A��`�'� ' "� Proposed Tigard Comprehensive Plan Text Changes � �� 4A. 4 �� ' ti.� �,-� � The City of Tigard proposes to amend the Goal 14: Urbanization chapter of its comprehensive plan to include the policies below. The policies will be located under existing Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goal 14.3. The policies are intended to provide guidance during the preparation and after adoption of the River Terrace Community�Plan. 5. Metro brought areas known as Area 63,Area 64 and Roy Rogers West Area within the Urban Growth Boundary. These areas are known as the River"1'errace Community Planning area. The City of Tigard shall be the designated service provider for the area. 6. The City shall prepare and adopt a River Terrace Communiry Plan for the area. The basis for the River Terrace Community Plan shall be the land use designations from the West Bull Mountain Concept Plan. Refinements to the West Bull Mountain Concept Plan shall be considered during the public planning process for the River Terrace Community Plan. 7. The City shall identify appropriate urban zoning districts and regulations as part of the River Terrace Community Plan,which shall comply with the Statewide Planning Goals and the Metro Urban Growth I�lanagement Functional Plan. 8. The City shall defer land use and zoning decisions within the area to Washington County,as outlined in the Intergovernmental Agreement dated Apri124,2012,until the River Terrace Community Plan is adopted. 9. If all areas are not annexed by the Ciry by the time the River Terrace Communiry Plan is adopted, the City shall seek an amendment to the Intergovernmental Agreement of April 24,2012 transferring land use and zoning responsibility for the River Terrace Community Planning area, including unincorporated areas,to the City. 10. Once the River Terrace Community Plan is adopted,and upon annexation to the City,urban zoning districts shall be adopted for these areas. If unincorporated areas remain, rural zoning shall be retained for these areas. 11. The City shall prepare a public Eacilities plan and an infrastructure financing plan as part of the River Terrace Community Plan. 12. No application of City zoning or development shall be approved by the city within the River Terrace Community Plan Area until such time as a full analysis under the Transportation Planning Rule ('I'PR) (OAR 660-012-00G0),which shall include a transportation funding strategy prepared in coordination with Washington County,has been completed and approved for the River Terrace Communiry Plan Area by the City. The funding strategy should identify transportation improvements proposed to resolve transportation system impacts generated by development of the River Terrace Community Area, the responsible party for constructing improvements, their associated cost estimates and public and/or private funding sources,including sources that may be specified by any applicable memoranda of understanding or development agreement. If the funding strategy includes transportauon Supplemental Development Charges,it should identify the process and timing for their approval and implementation. I�f��N � '' City o f Tigard - , , � Planning Commission Agenda MEETING DATE: No�rember 19, 2012; 7:00 p.m. MEETING LOCATION: City of 1'igard —Town Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd., 'I'igard, OR 97223 1. CI�LL TO ORD�R ��oo p.m. 2. ROLL CALL��oo�.m. 3. COMMUNICI�TIONS ��ol P.m. 4. CONSIDER MINUTES ��03 p.�". 5. 1�CI'ION ITEM — RI`'T,R TEKIZI�CF. PUBLIC INVOLVEMF,NT .�DOP'TION PL1�N��s r r,,. 6. BRIT.rINU —RIVER TERRI�CE COMMUNITY PLI�N ��25 p.m. 7. OTH�:R BUSINESS —8�Z5''."'. 8. �DJOURNMENT— 8:30p."'. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA— NOVEMBER 19, 2012 Ciry of Tigard � 13125 S��'Hall Blvd.,1'igard, OK 97223 � 5113-639-4171 � ��v��.tigard-orgo�� Page 1 of 1 CITY OF TIGAItD PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes November 19, 2012 CALL TO ORDER :lcting President.'�ndcrson called the meeting r.c� order at 7:06 pm. `I'he meeting�vas held in the Iigard Ci�-ic Centcr, To«-n Hall, at 13125 S�k' Hall Bl��d. ROLL CALL Present: Acting President Anderson l�cring tiTice President Rogers Commissioner poherty Commissioner Fitzgerald {:c�mmissioner I�Iuldoon Commissioner Sha�c•cy Absent: Cominissioner Ryan; C;ommissioner Schmidt; Alt Commissioner Armstrcmg; Alt. Commissioner �liller; Staff Present: Tom l�-1cGuire, Interim Commututy De�elopment Director; L�orcen Laughlin, �:xecuti��e �ssistant; Darren �X'yss, Senior Planner Also Present: N/� COMMUNICATIONS: Nonc CONSIDER MINUTES November 5 Meeting Minutes: �lctin� President.�nderson asked if there �vere any additions, deletions, or correctic�ns to the Novcmber 5 minute:s; there bein� nonc, Andersc>n declared t}�e minutes approved as subinitted. ACTION ITEM— RIVER TERRACE PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ADOPTION PLAN Senior Planncr Da.rrerl VG'yss said he was here se�king approval of thc Ri�-er"I'errace Communit�� I'lan I'ublic Invoh-ement Plan. i-[c notcd this�vas brought before r.he 1'lanning C;ommissioti for re��ie�z- by_�ssociate Planner, :�-larissa Daniels, on October 15. He reininded the Commissioners that I�aruels had told them this would come back before the Cominission for adoption after it had been �-etted a bit, and after the Ri�-er Terrace Commui-ut�� I'lan kick-off ineetin�had taken place. 'I"hat meeting toc�k place at the end of October. '1'hey'd heard nothing from the mcering that would cause them to change their approach, so the plan is back beEore the Corrunission for ad�ption; the same as it was �vhen the}�'d reviewed it on October 15. I:\LRPLN\Vlsnning CommissWn\201J Packea\731912-Actfon Item and Briefin¢•River Ter2ce\TPC Minutas/ar 111912.dxx l�il�e 1 (�E 4 1X'yss said the plan prol-ides the c�utline for project phases and the�eneral timcframes for commurut�� meetings. '1'he "I"echnical.�dvisory Committee had met once and ��ill meet three more times. 'I'hc Stakeholdcrs �'orking Group (S�'C�) comprised of p�-operty o«•ners & stakeholders will recom�cne and more people w�ill be added; that group ��-ill meet four times. A 1'lanrung C;orn�nissioner and a City Councilor w-ill bc in�=ited to join the S�X'G. 'I'hete�vill be foux more communit�-meetings during the coursc of thc project. 'I"he plan includes cammunication principles, key players, stakehalders, and a matri�c of acti`-iries. If the plan is approved, stafEwill ha�-e a sc�lid base ta do thc public invoh-emer�t acti�•ities and pro��icie the community a documc°nr to refer to when wanting infor��natio�� an u�hat opportunities arc out therc for them to get in�-olved in the plantung process. Staff recommends that the Plannin�; Commission, actin�as thc Cointnittce fox C:itizen Involvement (CC�, rnake a tnotion and thcn ti-ote to adopt the Yublic Invoh-ement Plan as presented. After a short yuestion and ans«�er period, a motion�vas made: MOTION The fc�llo�ving motian was made by Cornmissioner poherty�: "I move that we accept the River Terrace Community Plan as presented tonight by Senior Planner Wyss." Commissioner Muldoon added the following amendment to the motion: "to include, as discussed, the modification to part 8 for availability of information." CorTUnissioner �fuldoon also seconded the motion. The motion�vas voted on and carried unanimously. BRIEFING — RIVER TERR.ACE COMMUNITY PLAN Sr. Planner Darren Wys� c�istributed copies of thc �-Uest Bu11 �lountain Concept Plan Report. 1� link to the plan is available c�n-line at «T��-.tigard-or.�c�v/riverterrace. W}'ss said lus intent for toni�ht's meeung�•as to discuss the Ri�-er Terrace commu��it}� planning prc�cess. He �tiill talk about what's in thc Concept I'lan, and�cill talk about the public hearin� that's scheduled for December 3�� to adopt the recc�mmended land uses from the Concept Plan. �x'}�ss explained that the �Iest Bull I�iountain cc�ncept plan �•as creatcd over the course of three years by Washington (;ounty �-ith the help of a stakeholder workin� group (S`XIU) and a technical advisory comrxuttee (I'.�C). The ttx�o groups came up �vith project goals and principles that guided the development of the land use, transportat.ion, and parks framework maps. These maps represented the visic.>n stakeholdcrs agreed upon for the future development of the ar.ea. The concept plan set out to provide a�-arieri� of residcntial densities and housing types; dispexse densiries throughout the community; pr.ovide appropriate amc>unts of coxnmcrcial uses, parks, trails and open space; and outlinc a multi-modal nctwc�rlc of cannected streets and ��alkable blocks. I:\LRPLN\Plannlne Commisslon\2012 Packets\311912•Attton Item and Brleting-Niver TarncelTPC Minutes for 111912.docx Page 2 c�f 4 �n important thing to note abc�ut the concept plan is that the SWG and the 1'z�C both �-oted to for�vard thc plan to thc ��'ashin.�toz1 Count�= Planning Commission and B��ard af Cammissioners for con�ideration and adoption. In November 2010, the Planning Comrnission voted to rect�mmend the Board adopt the ec>ncept plan. In Decemher 2010, the I3oarc� adopted the concept plan b�T ReSOlution and Order. 'I'he idea was to r.akc this vision and move it into a communitv �lan. Since the conclusion of the concept plan, the city has annesea a portion of the area (,1i-ea C4 in fa112011.). In sprin�of 2012, the city agreed-�ria an inte:r�o�rexnmental agreement (IG.:�) �t>ith ��'ashington Count�� tc.> refine its West I3u111�Tt. C;oncept Plan into the River. Terrace C�7mmunit�r I'lan. The cc�inmunity plan will put int�� place a means to implemcnt the�ision of the concept plan through zoning, de�reloptnent code regulations and other measures that�vill ma.l�e urban detJe]c�prnent Passible. 'I"he process will also include u�dar.es to util.ity, parks and transportation master plans, including the financial strategies necessaiy to fund and maintain rcquire�i infrast�ucture improvements. Petitions hai-e been f led by property o�vners to annex the remainder of r.he area ��ith.in the urban gr�wth boundart� (�reas 63 and Ro�� Rogcrs ��'est). The cit�! will complete the River 'I'crrace Cornmuninr I'lan f<>r all of these areas. City sraff has developed a wark pro�;ram to guide the project thxou�l� completic�n. '1"his will include � lot of technical u ork to ensure the communin� plan ineets dze state and .regional�lanning rec�uiretnents, as well as a public in�Tol�-ement plan t�� enga�;e stakeholders in any necessaiy refiilenlents to the concepr, plan as the prc�cess moves Ear�i-ard. Staff anticipatcs completic�n of the Ri�Ter Terrace Communiry Plan in summer 2014. Wvss �-ent c�n to «�alk the c�mmissioners through the plan. He s�olLe abc�ut the tasks in pro�ress and assured the 1'lanriin� Caznmission they would be kept up tc� s�eed. 'I"he first reco�nmendation the I'lannin�; Cominissian will be asked to malte is to adopt the concept plan rccoinmcnded land uses into the 'I'i�;ard Comprehensive P1an. This action ��,�ill set expecr.ations for the comrnurut�� planning process, as �vcll as allo�vin� the city to access a portion of the CE'T" funds fr.om Met�o that��•erc, given to the ciry through the IGA �rith W�i�hin�ton County. r1 number of policies ��ill alsc� l�e recommended for adoption t� guide regulation of thc River Terrace area duxing az�d after c�mpletion of the communiry piannin� process. �"hese recoinmenc�ed land uses �vill be fur.ther anal��ied as part of the comrnunin� plannin� prc�cess and, if refir�cments are needed, recommendations will be Ur.ougllt back to r.hc Planning Coz-ninission aizcl City� Council for adoption at the end of the process. 1� public hearin� has bcen scl�eduled �4�ith the Planiung Cotnmission an Decembcr. 3, 2012 and with (:it}7 Council on llccember 11, 2012. 1:\LRPLN\Planning Commission\2012 Cackets\111912-Action Item and Briefing•River Terrace\TPC Minutes for 111912.docx I�a�C 3 O{�� OTHER BUSINESS "I'here �vas a reminder from Planning C;ommission Secretary Dorecn Laughlin that a going away� celebrat�on for former I'lanning Commission President Dave Walsh is set for the last meerin�of the year— December 17��; dctails to cc>me later. ADJOURNMENT Actin�; President Anderson adjourned the meeting at 8:Q5 p.m. n `'�"`, ` ` . I � ,�- C..�.�� Doreen Laughlin,Planrun�;Co �ssion Secrctary � f7r�-, /�-J�f�t--�.__._.� � �-�'I`I'ES'I': ��cung President Tom._�nderson I:\LItVLN\Plsnnln4 Commission\�D32 Fackeb\]3193]-Action Item and BrleflnQ•River Ternce}TVC Mi�ut�s ior 111912.dax 1'age 4 of 4 DRAFT 11/12/12 River Terrace Community Plan AGENDA ITEM #5 Creating a community of qreat neighborhoods I. Project Overview The City of Tigard is now kicking off a community planning effort in River Terra�e. This process will develop specific proposals for future land uses and public improvements in the River Terrace area. It will provide tailored policies and a long-range physical development guide for elected officials and citizens engaged in community development. Elements of the community plan are: � � �'.�9 • Land Use (zoning and regulations) • Transportation ��-� • Public Facilities and Services :,��_ �'�� • Parks and Trails <; , � f� ,� • Natural Resources • Infrastructure Financing Plan Figure 1.Components of We want to create a plan that reflects community values and has the River Terrace community support. We encourage you to become involved and contribute to the decision-making process. Background Tigard will be responsible for preparing a community ;o�� _.��` plan for a portion of the area that was included in F , - '-' the West Bull Mt. Concept Plan (WBMCP) completed _� �� •- �_� . ? by Washington County in 2010. The area includes . , � the recent River Terrace annexation (Area 64), and �° urban growth boundary expansion areas 63 and Roy � , Rogers West (see map). .. ._.�,: The difference between the community planning � i--�..___, �- ~ '�r- effort and the West Bull Mountain Concept Plan is �-:,-�.� that the WBMCP established the broad vision and � blueprint for developing a future community, while the River Terrace Community Plan will implement, to the extent practical, the WBMCP and consist of specific regulatory land-use maps, public facility and transportation master plans, infrastructure financing mechanisms, and codes and regulations. In other words, the WBMCP alone does not have legislative land use authority, and the RTCP, once adopted by Tigard City Council, will allow urbanization to occur. II. Process The RTCP is expected to take 18 to 24 months to complete and get through the legislative adoption process. There will be a variety of public involvement opportunities available to the DRAFT 11/12/12 � community. This includes a series of community open houses throughout the process, as well as a citizen advisory committee and technical advisory committee. In addition to land use, the City Council will need to approve a River Terrace financial plan which will help pay for the construction of required new infrastructure and its operations and maintenance. This may include changes to development charges for parks, storm water management, sanitary sewers, water, and transportation improvements. It will also be important to address whether or not other special assessments will be needed for land use and building permits, as well as utility rates to ultimately recoup the investment the city makes in completing the community plan. Schedule General T'uneframe-River Teaace Communiry Plan w72 2073 zoLt Task 3rd Qtr 4tlf Qh lst Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr qh Qtr lst Qtr 7nd Qtr 3d Qtr Ith Qtr Public Involvement/TAUSWG Adopt WBMCP '� # Goal 5 Natural Resouras Comp Plan/Zoning Maps a�Regulatlons �� Transportatlon System Plan Update Psrks Master Plan&SDC Update Water Masoer Plan Update Sanlnry Sewer Plan Update Stortnwrter MYster Plan Updrte Inf��tru�ure Flnandng Strategy , Public Fadllty Plan Upda[e � �� Community Nleetlng � SbkeFalder Working Group Meetlng � dty Coundl Fkaring � TediNal AdviwryCommlttee Meetlng �(PlanningCommlsslon Hexing Project Phases •'• Project Kickoff • • Council acceptance/adoption of the WBMCP • CCI approval of the Public Involvement Plan • Get the word out • Launch Stakeholder Working Group and Technical Advisory Committee ❖ Launch Tasks • Assessment and Collaboration • Plan Preparation ❖ Adoption Process DRAFT 11/12/12 • The following components of the Public Facility Plan will be accepted by City Council in advance of the entire plan being adopted: ■ Parks Master Plan and SDC Update ■ Water Master Plan Update • Sanitary Sewer Plan Update ■ Stprmwater Master Plan Update • The Goal 5 Natural Resources,Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Maps and regulations, Transportation System Plan Update, Public Facility Plan Update, and Infrastructure Financing strategy will be adopted by Tigard City Council III. Public Involvement Public Involvement Plan Requirements The public involvement plan seeks to achieve the goals outlined in the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and to include a broad cross section of the community, consistent with federal requirements for Title VI communities. Tigard Comprehensive Plan The Public Involvement Plan will implement the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Citizen Involvement Goals, which are as follows: Goal 1.1: Provide Citizens, affected agencies,and otherjurisdictions the oqportunitv to qarticipate in all phases of the planning process. Goal 1.2 Ensure all Citizens have access to: A. Opportunities to communicate directly to the City; and B. Information on issues in an understandable form. Specifically the Plan will ensure that citizens and other stakeholders can participate,communicate and receive information about the Tigard HCT Corridor Land Use Plan. Communication Principles Early identification of key messages will contribute to initial and ongoing project communications.The project management team will refine and coordinate messaging throughout the project. • The project team will make every effort to provide timely information and answer questions from the public. � Interaction and engagement will improve the quality of planning River Terrace. • Establish and maintain productive partnerships with individuals and organizations affected by the plan. • Some concerns will not be able to be fully addressed during this process and there will be challenges.Continued cooperation among agencies, citizens, and otherjurisdictions will be required to resolve issues as the project advances. DRAFT 11/12/12 . Changes will not occur overnight.There will be ongoing opportunities for citizens to influence this process. • Maintain a record of public input and ensure that input is considered during the planning process. Key players ❖ Project Management Team- ❖ Stakeholder Working Group-An advisory committee comprised of community representatives including residents, property owners, service providers, and developers to advise the PMT throughout the process. ❖ Technical Advisory Committee-The TAC will include stakeholder agencies, including but not limited to ODOT, Department of Land Conservation and Development,TriMet, Metro,the City of Tigard,Washington County..... (etc.). The TAC will provide technical review,ensure coordination among agencies and other planning efforts,and ensure compliance with state and regional plans, policies, and standards. ❖ City Council and Planning Commission Stakeholders Key stakeholders in the River Terrace Community Plan fall into four categories: • Property owners and developers in the area • Property owners, businesses and re5idents in the area surrounding River Terrace including in the City of Tigard, Bull Mountain, the future expansion area and the rural element. • Advocacy groups with an interest in planning,transportation,environmental issues or land development • Institutional partners,such as Metro and Washington County,and jurisdictional service providers such as the Tigard Tualatin School District and Clean Water Services. Public Involvement/Communication Activities � • � • . « • � ' Opportunities for Participation: ' 1. Stakeholder Working Group 0 a � ❖ Property Owners Meetings scheduled meetings:This committee will act ❖ Residents throughout the as an advisory body to staff and ❖ Service providers process will provide a venue for citizen ❖ Developers involvement opportunities in planning for River Terrace 2. Community Meetings:The City of L�1 L�1 ❖ Property Owners Meetings scheduled Tigard will host a series of :• Residents throughout the meetings to engage project :• Service providers process stakeholders near the project area ❖ Developers 3. Project Elements Online Open 0 :• Property Owners Online Engagement DRAFT 11/12/12 House ❖ Residents Tool ❖ Developers 4. Comment Period:The 0 a 0 ❖ All stakeholders Online comment opportunities for public comment form will be advertised in advance.Such opportunities include SWG Time allowed at meetings,online comment forms, scheduled meetings the open house, etc. Opportunities for Communitation 5. Community Briefings and Outside 0 ❖ Property owners Meetings scheduled Events:City staff will offer ❖ Residents throughout presentations to interested ❖ Business owners assessment and community groups and key ❖ Advocacy groups collaboration and stakeholders at their regular draft plan meetings. development 6. City Council/Planning Commission H Q Q ❖ Residents Presentations at briefings:Tigard City Council and ❖ Businesses Planning Commission Planning Commission will be ❖ Property Owners and City Council briefed on project progress in •;• Advocacy groups work sessions at key intervals. Members will also be invited to •�• Agency Partners participate in events, and will receive project materials Opportunities for Information: 7. Website/webpage:Timely � 0 0 ❖ All stakeholders City of Tigard website information will be posted/updated on the City of Tigard's website.Website updates may be announced to interested stakeholders through email communications 8. Information material/display(s): a C�1 Q ❖ All stakeholders Delivery method will Project information will be made depend on the type available in multiple formats: of informational maps,flyers,factsheets, mail material/display(s) distribution, posters,customer counter handouts, project displays, etc. 9. Community Development 0 0 0 ❖ All Stakeholders Email Listserv Listserv: Information will be created and distributed periodically to interested parties and other subscribers through email. Frequency and content of messages will be adapted to project activities. 10. Neighborhood Networks/County H C�1 0 ❖ Residents Press Releases DRAFT 12/12/12 CPOs: Provide updates to the ❖ Property owners Neighborhood Network web administrators and County CPO Coordinators for distribution. 11. News media outreach:The H 0 L�1 ❖ All stakeholders Press releases and Communications Team will Cityscape Newsletter prepare stories about the articles program for The Times, Oregonian, Cityscape Newsletrer, and other local media, to announce the project,extend event invitations, provide timely information,and highlight project milestones/accomplishments. . . w� City of Tigard � � r � Memorandum AGENDA ITEM #6 _.. �� . To: Tigard Planning Commission From: Darren Wyss, Senior Planner Re: River Terrace Communiry Plan Update Date: November 13, 2012 The city has agreed via an intergovernmental agreement (IGA) with Washington County to refine its West Bull Mt. Concept Plan into the River Terrace Community Plan. The community plan will put into place a means to implement the vision of the concept plan through zoning, development code regulations and other measures that will make urban development possible. The process will also include updates to utility, parks and transportation master plans, including the financial strategies necessary to fund and maintain required infrastructure improvements. The concept plan was created over the course of three years with the help of a stakeholder working group (SWG) and a technical advisory committee (TAC). Project goals and principles guided the development of the land use, transportation and parks framework maps. These maps represented the vision stakeholders agreed upon for the future development of the area. They provide a variety of residential densities and housing rypes; disperse densities throughout the communiry; provide appropriate amounts of commercial uses, parks, trails and open space; and outline a multi-modal network of connected streets and walkable blocks. The SWG and TAC both voted to forward the concept plan to the Washington County Planning Commission and Board of Commissioners for consideration and adoption. In November 2010, the Planning Commission voted to recommend the Board adopt the concept plan. In December 2010, the Board adopted the concept plan by Resolution and Order. Since the conclusion of the concept plan, the city has annexed a porrion of the area (Area 64) and petitions have been filed by property owners to annex the remainder of the area within the urban growth boundary (Areas 63 and Roy Rogers West). The city will complete the River Terrace Communiry Plan for all of these areas. Ciry staff has developed a work program (Attachment 1) to guide the project through completion. This will include a lot of technical work to ensure the communiry plan meets the state and regional planning requirements, as well as a public involvemcnt plan to engage stakeholders in any necessary refinements to the concept plan as the process moves forward. Staff anticipates completion of the River Terrace Communiry Plan in summer 2014 (Attachment 2). The Planning Commission will be an important component of the community planning process. The Corrunission will be asked to review a number of comprehensive plan amendments and make recommendations to ciry council, so staff will provide frequent updates and hopes to have a commissioner sit on the project's stakeholder working group. The first recommendation the planning commission will be asked to make is to adopt the concept plan recommended land uses (Attachment 3) into the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. This action will set expectations for the community planning process, as well as allowing the ciry to access a portion of the CET funds from Metro that were given to the city through the IGA with Washington County. A number of policies will also be recommended for adoption to guide regulation of the River Terrace area during and after completion of the communiry planning process (Attachment 4). These recommended land uses will be further analyzed as part of the community planning process and if there are needed refinements, recommendations will be brought back to planning commission and city council for adoption at the end of the process. A public hearing has been scheduled with the planning corrunission on December 3, 2012 and with city council on December 11, 2012. The city has begun work on a few tasks included in the work program. These include: a tree grove inventory and an Economic, Social, Environment and Energy analysis (ESEE) for both the tree grove inventory and the local wetland inventory previously completed during the concept planning process; an initial meeting of the technical advisory committee; and a community kick-off ineeting held on October 24, 2012. The kick-off ineeting was well attended (47 signed in and staff estimated 70 total participants) and overall the conversations and comments regarding the concept plan were positive. Individuals had specific topics they wanted addressed in the communiry plan, but there was no organized opposition to any particular recommendations. The most popular comment was wanting the communiry planning process completed as soon as possible. Staff will hand out paper copies of the West Bull Mt. Concept Plan at the meeting on November 19th. If you wish to read the document before the meeting, a link to the concept plan can be found from the River Terrace Communiry Plan webpage. www.tigard-or.gov/riverterrace If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at 503-718-2442 or Darren@tigard-or.gov ,� River Terrace Community Plan Attachment 1 = - Work Program - 1��AF'I" , , , November 6, 2012 Tigard will be responsible for preparing a community plan for the River Terrace area. The planning area will include all property within the urban growth boundary (Areas 63, 64& Roy Rogers West) that was included in the West Bull Mt. Concept Plan completed by Washington County in 2010. `The community planning effort will refine the concept plan recommendations into adopted land use regulations, public infrastructure plans and financing strategies for the area. Task 1: Public Involvement ■ Prepare and execute a public involvement plan that outlines appropriate communication and outreach tools, as well as appointed advisory committees and community meetings. ■ Form technical advisory committee of partner agency staff to provide feedback and direction,inform proposed policy and review regulatory and financing components. Subcommittees will be formed for each infrastructure task. ■ Form council appointed stakeholder working group,including members of the concept plan group as well as other interested individuals, property owners and stakeholders. The group will advise staff on general direction of the project. ■ Schedule,hold and document four community meetings. ■ Present recommended public involvement plan to the Tigard Committee for Citizen Involvement for adoption Major Products: • Adopted Public Involvement Plan ■ Appointment of TAC and SWG ■ Schedule of Community Meetings Timeline: ■ September 2012—July 2014 (ongoin� Task 2: Ado�t West Bull Mt. Conce�t Plan ■ Prepare comprehensive plan amendment to adopt concept plan recommended land uses and associated Goal 14 policies into Tigard Comprehensive Plan. ■ Schedule and hold Planning Commission work session and public hearing. ■ Schedule and hold City Council work session and public hearing. ■ Prepare and distribute required public notices Major Products: ■ Amendment Package: maps,policies, staff report and notices ■ Adopted Updated Comprehensive Plan Map and Goal 14 Chapter Timeline: ■ October 2012—December 2012 Task 3: Goa15 Natural Resources ■ Conduct inventory and assessment of tree groves gxeater than two acres. ■ Prepare ESEE analysis for tree grove inventory and local wetland inventory conducted as part of the concept planning process and adopted by the State of Oregon. ■ Prepare comprehensive plan amendment to update Significant Tree Grove Map and adopt associated ESEE analysis. ■ Prepare comprehensive plan amendment to adopt local wetland inventory and associated ESEE analysis and update Wedands and Stream Corridors Map. ■ Prepare comprehensive plan amendment to update Significant Habitat Map based on Tualatin Basin Partners habitat analysis performed as part of the Metro Nature in Neighborhood Program. Major Products: ■ Tree Grove Inventory and Assessment ■ ESEE Analysis ■ Adopted Updated Maps (Significant Tree Groves, Significant Habitat,Wetlands and Stream Corridors) Timeline: ■ October 2012—July 2013 Task 4• Com�rehensive Plan/Zonin� Ma�s and Regulations ■ Conduct review of concept plan assumptions and analysis,including buildable land inventory and recommended densities to ensure target of 10 units/acre. ■ Refine concept plan recommended densities and locations into Tigard Comprehensive Plan map designations as necessary, based on review and committee feedback. ■ Assign Tigard zoning districts to property to achieve required 10 units/acre • Conduct analysis of Tigard Community Development Code commercial and mixed-use district regulations to identify appropriate zoning for Neighborhood Commercial area development. If no current districts are acceptable, create new regulations to be administered in River Terrace to achieve the concept plan vision. ■ Conduct analysis of current allowed uses and create code languages to address non- conforming uses once Tigard zoning is adopted. ■ Prepare comprehensive plan amendment to update Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map and Text and Zoning Map and Text. Major Products: ■ Concept Plan Land Use Analysis Report ■ Recommended Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments ■ Recommended Tigard Zoning Map Amendments ■ Recommended Tigard Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments ■ Recommended Tigard Community Development Code Amendments, ■ Adopted Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps and Text Timeline: ■ November 2012—July 2014 Task 5: Trans�ortation System Plan U�date ■ Conduct review of concept plan assumptions and transportation analysis and identify needed expansion of analysis. Expected issues for review include,but are not limited to: ■ Crash data and analysis on existing area roadways • Existing and potential speed issues and mitigating design strategies ■ Transportation Planning Rule (I'PR) requirements ■ Regional Transportation Functional Plan (RTFP) requirements ■ Planned new roadways and roadway extensions and connections, regarding potential issues related to grade, natural resources,alignment, and right of way requirements. ■ Conduct additional transportation analysis as needed and refine concept plan recommendations. ■ Conduct review of city street cross sections and connectivity standards to ensure compatibiliry with River Terrace area. ■ Recommend functional classification to proposed streets,including consistency with state,regional and county functional classification maps. • Update Tigard Transportation System Plan to include recommended infrastructure and associated analysis. ■ Update planning level cost estimates for River Terrace transportation needs. Major Products: ■ Concept Plan Transportation Analysis Report o Technical Memorandum: Concept Plan Assessment o Technical Memorandum: Updated Analysis o Alternarive Design Concepts (if needed) o Updated Cost Estimates o Final Communiry Plan Transportation Report ■ Adopted Updated Tigard Transportation System Plan Tuneline: ■ December 2012—March 2014 Task 6: Parks Master Plan and SDC U�date ■ Conduct review of concept plan assumptions and analysis,including park standards, data and need fmdings. ■ Refine concept plan recommendations as needed based on review and to conform to Tigard Park System Master Plan standards. ■ Update Tigard Park System Master Plan needs analysis to incorporate River Terrace area park needs. ■ Update planning level cost estimates for River Terrace park needs. Major Products: ■ Concept Plan Parks Analysis Report ■ Adopted Updated Tigard Parks System Master Plan Timeline: ■ November 2012—July 2013 Task 7: Water Master Plan U�date ■ Conduct review of concept plan assumptions and analysis, including demand and infrastructure findings. ■ Expand projected demand and infrastructure needs analysis to include Tigard urban reserve areas to ensure appropriate sizing and locations for future development. r ■ Refine concept plan findings and cost estimates. ■ Update Tigard Water System Master Plan to incorporate River Terrace and urban reserve area demand and infrastructure needs,including cost estimates. Major Products: ■ Concept Plan Water Analysis Report ■ Tigard Urban Reserves Demand and Infrastructure Needs Report ■ Adopted Updated Tigard Water System Master Plan Timeline: ■ November 2012—July 2013 Task 8: Sanitary Sewer Master Plan U�date ■ Collaborate with Clean Water Services to conduct review of concept plan assumptions and analysis,including need and infrastructure findings. ■ Collaborate with Clean Water Services to expand projected need and infrastructure analysis to include Tigard urban reserve areas to ensure appropriate sizing and locations for future development. ■ Refine concept plan findings and cost estimates. ■ Update Sanitary Sewer Master Plan to incorporate River Terrace and urban reserve area infrastructure needs,including cost estimates. Major Products: ■ Concept Plan Sanitary Sewer Analysis Report ■ Tigard Urban Reserves Infrastructure Needs Report ■ Adopted Updated Sanitary Sewer Master Plan Tuneline: ■ January 2013—September 2013 Task 9: Stormwater Master Plan U�date • Collaborate with Clean Water Services to conduct review of concept plan assumptions and analysis,including need and infrastructure fmdings. ■ Collaborate with Clean Water Services to expand projected need and infrastructure analysis to include Tigaxd urban reserve areas to ensure appropriate sizing and locations for future development. . ■ Refine concept plan findings and cost estimates. ■ Produce Stormwater Master Plan for River Terrace and urban reserve area infrastructure needs,including cost estimates. Major Products: ■ Concept Plan Sanitary Sewer Analysis Report ■ Tigard Urban Reserves Infrastructure Needs Report ■ Adopted Stortnwater Master Plan Timeline: ■ January 2013 —September 2013 Task 10: Infrastructure Financing Str� ■ Review estimated infrastructure costs and mechanisms for funding. ■ Transportation ■ Parks ■ Sanitary Sewer ■ Stormwater ■ Water ■ Analyze various strategies for funding infrastructure needs and recuperating planning costs, including review of system development charges, fees and special districts. ■ Develop strategy to fund improvements and maintenance ■ Prepare recommended Infrastructure Financing Strategy � Prepare recommended Fees and Charges schedule ■ Schedule and conduct Ciry Council work sessions and public hearings for discussion and adoption. Major Products: ■ Adopted Infrastructure Financing Strategy ■ Adopted Fees and Charges Timeline: )anuary 2013—July 2014 r Task 11: Public Facilit� Plan U�date ■ Package infrastructure needs and estimated costs into Public Faciliry Plan document to comply with Statewide Planning Goal 11. ■ Prepare comprehensive plan amendment to adopt into Tigard Comprehensive Plan. ■ Schedule Planning Commission work session and public hearing. ■ Schedule City Council work session and public hearing. ■ Prepare and distribute required public notices Major Products: ■ r'lmendment Package: maps,policies, staff report and notices ■ Adopted Updated Public Facility Plan Timeline: ■ October 2013—July 2014 Attachment 2 General Tixneframe- River Terrace Community Plan 2012 2013 2014 Task 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr lst Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr lst Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr Public Involvement/TAC/SWG Adopt WBMCP �"�. � Goal S Natural Resources Comp Plan/Zoning Maps and Regulations 7ransportation System Plan Update Parks Master Plan&SDC Update Water Master Plan Update " ° Sanitary Sewer Plan Update Stormwater Master Plan Update Infrastructure Financing Strategy Public Facility Plan Update � Community Meeting � Stakeholder Working Group Meeting � City Council Hearing 1 � Technical Advisory Committee Meeting � Planning Commission Hearing /��l�l_!��?�'°e�71�'1��:! �Il��yil/Ii/� � ,� • � • � . � • . • ' � 71G�RD / . - I • I I I I I , . —� _ � �au- ....�. IIIIH�� hm� � �r� , . �� ' , ::: .... N�� /'��` •.� � ui .� N,._",,�,:�;, �� _ _- = p ��: : '�r,I� �.- 1� ' • � N IflIN 1 IIIfl1�.j, �`1�' �; � ' � ��a �� a r : �'- � �!! 'H p�=� i �� s� �� f � III 1�.! __ - � 1 � � �f t N1 11qIt n�_�u.n■C.. --�, _ ��ir� ° ' �, r /�� t11 !��!1lli � • •• -• �- , r � I , ��.' �; �n�� / 11�� • . • • • ' � • � ii�i i � � !� 1 �; • �- � �� ,�� a! � �I p -• �- = � ; � - I�i� r� i i�1�1 . �- :� - ��innur�r�nr i��r� � � uuu �:= t!!II � � - ; . � .� � ►�� - . •. ... . � nnj !If�=GlI�[ii,;� �� .� � -:�• ••- •. .�� " �,_ ��fn� ��_ � ' • • — —�=�nroMna�n � � ,n.■� - � ■=��f! / � • ' ' - � 1 � � �� , � •. • :. •. � �� ► � ►� .�'. � .. . :. .. ! ��ir'►..� ��rr�� ; � . :. •. :s �`�� :�� lu�� UIN 1 it�� ii/ •�- � SC�C N�IHIH� � �E��i �� =�I�Nil1! ��-.� � 1 1 1 � S� � 1► �NI/lf�1 H � � ( �i�NN�NtBift� � � �111 �p1111fIff �� ;� - i - '��y IN•�in�� ■��■�� n�p � � -� � • !�� pJ��u�i'f �■ � �d�: i� � � � ��I ��irr�� 1�•�� NIII 1�/ �1� � a =�� ...., .► �,��1■p ��1■�i..... �-•.,N , ► �......■�lil� .r��i//��ir�� ►r � i� � , 'nii�i-'■" �:• I ► � �� i m�= '�►'� , �, � � : // i�I ��' ■ �� ,, - � - %� �-- '� � ' � � �1�� _ . �� n��si�:� e► , �� ■ � �1�. ��:��Ii . ��/ � � �1�►�,�� iUllllll� rn�� !;�• s �•t► ' n ��=:� �� =:::: ��um i`.:S �Illu �•yn IIN IIHIII!�� Attachment 4 ., City of Tigard : -+� CPA2012-00002 '��;: , � Proposed Tigard Comprehensive Plan Text Changes The City of Tigard proposes to amend the Goal 14: Urbanization chapter of its comprehensive plan to include the policies below. The policies will be located under existing Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goal 14.3. The policies are intended to provide guidance during the preparation and after adoption of the River Terrace Communiry Plan. 5. Metro brought areas known as Area 63,Area 64 and Roy Rogers West Area within the Urban Growth Boundary. These areas are known as the River Terrace Community Planning area. The City of Tigard shall be the designated service provider for the area. 6. The City shall prepare and adopt a River Terrace Community Plan for the area. The basis for the River Terrace Community Plan shall be the land use designations from the West Bull Mountain Concept Plan. Refinements to the West Bull Mountain Concept Plan shall be considered during the public planning process for the River Terrace Community Plan. 7. The City shall idenrify appropriate urban zoning districts and regulations as part of the River Terrace Community Plan,which shall comply with the Statewide Planning Goals and the Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan. 8. The City shall defer land use and zoning decisions within the area to Washington County, as outlined in the Intergovernmental Agreement dated Apri124,2012, until the River Terrace Community Plan is adopted. 9. If all areas are not annexed by the Ciry by the time the River Terrace Community Plan is adopted, the City shall seek an amendment to the Intergovernmental Agreement of Apri124, 2012 transferring land use and zoning responsibility for the River Terrace Community Planning area, including unincorporated areas, to the City. 10. Once the R.iver Terrace Community Plan is adopted, and upon annexation to the City, urban zoning districts shall be adopted for these areas. If unincorporated areas remain,rural zoning shall be reta.ined for these areas. 11. The City shall prepare a public facilities plan and an infrastructure financing plan as part of the R.iver Terrace Community Plan. 12. No application of City zoning or development shall be approved by the city within the River Terrace Community Plan Area until such time as a full analysis under the Transportation Planning Rule ('I'PR) (OAR 660-012-0060),which shall include a transportation funding strategy prepared in coordination with Washington County, has been completed and approved for the River Terrace Community Plan Area by the City. The funding strategy should identify transportation improvements proposed to resolve transportation system impacts generated by development of the River Terrace Community Area, the responsible party for constructing improvements, their associated cost estimates and public and/or private funding sources,including sources that may be specified by any applicable memoranda of understanding or development agreement. If the funding strategy includes transportation Supplemental Development Charges,it should idenrify the process and timulg for their approval and 'unplementarion. � : . , � REQUEST FOR C4MMENTS DATE: November 8. 2012 7�0: Piannin9 Mgr Stev�n Sparks Ciqr of Beauerton PO Box 4155 Beaverton,lR 91076 FROI�1: Cit�� of Tigard Planning Division STr�FF Darren W�ss.Senior Planner (x2442� CON1'AC"I': Phone: (503) 718-2442, rax: (503) 718-2748,Email: darrcn(d tigard-or.�o� COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA)2012-00002 - ADOPT WEST BULL MT CONCEPT PLAN RECOMMENDED LAND USES AND ASSOCIATED POLICIES - REQUEST: 'I�o amend the current Tigard Com�r�hensive Plan 1�1ap to include map designarions for the River Terrace Community Plan area based on recommended land uses found in Washington Count��'s West Bull Mt. Concept Plan; to amend the current Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goal 14: Urbanization goals, policies, and recommended action measures. LOCATION: River Terrace Area ZONE: N /A APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380 and 18.390; Comprehensive Plan Goals 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ,12, 13, and 14;Metro Funcrional Plan Title 11; and Statewide Planning Goals 1,2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14. r�ttached are thc Applicant's Materials for your re�new. From informauon supplied b}' ��arious departments and agencies and from other informarion available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: November 23, 2012. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If��ou are unable to res�ond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with ��our comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any quesrions, contact the Tigard lanning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: _ We havc re�newed the proposal and have no objecrions to it. Please cuntact of our ofhce. � Please refer to the enclosed letter or email. _ Written comments provided below: Name&Number of Person Commenting:�� t�Y��-- ' � �� l��D R�� ._. . o � ��.2 Cifi� of B��rert.on Commun�ty & ��onomic Dev . . �J . ' • ' , . \ •, . . ' . • _ . � � ` Beaverton �, . Community and Economic Development November 21, 2012 Darren Wyss, Senior Planner City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Comments for Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) 2012-00002 —Adopt West Bull MT Concept Plan Recommended Land Uses and Associated Policies Dear Mr. Wyss: The City of Beaverton has reviewed the proposed Tigard Comprehensive Plan Text Changes and offers the comments listed below. As you know, the City of Beaverton is preparing to launch a public planning process for the South Cooper Mountain area located just north of SW Scholls Ferry Road and SW 175th. Approximately 544 acres of what is also known as Urban Reserve Area (URA) 66 was added to the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) in October 2011. One of the conditions Metro placed on the UGB expansion requires the City of Beaverton to prepare a concept plan for the entirety of URA 66 (1,776 acres) as well as a community plan and corre5ponding comprehensive plan provisions and land use regulations for that portion of South Cooper Mountain now in the UGB. The City Council approved annexation of this 544- acre territory on November 13, 2012. Given the numerous common transportation, sewer, water, stormwater management, natural resource, and trails and transit service issues involved in the River Terrace planning effort and Beaverton's upcoming South Cooper Mountain project, the city suggests that policies be added regarding inter-jurisdictional coordination and cooperation as follows: • Transportation & transit: It is recommended that policies be added requiring coordination among the two cities, Washington County, TriMet and ODOT to address transportation and transit, including timing of needed improvements and funding strategies and mechanisms. • Sewer, water and stormwater mana�ement: Policies requiring coordination among the two cities and Clean Water Services should be added to address common sewer, water and storm water management issues. City of Beaverton • 4755 SW Griffith Drive• PO Box 4755 • Beaverton, OR 97076 •www.BeavertonOregon.gov .r � • Natural resources: In addition, the city suggests a policy be added regarding coordination among the two cities, Metro, Tualatin Hills Parks & Recreation District and Washington County to address protection and enhancement of natural resources in the area, provision of access to public lands and natural features, including planning for trails and pedestrian and bicycle travel to access these lands and features, and connect with other local and regional trails. • Inter�overnmental A�reements: The city recommends adding a policy regarding cooperative agreements among the two cities, Washington County, CWS, and other applicable service providers to address phasing of development along 5W Scholls Ferry and SW 175th/Roy Rogers, including timing of transportation sewer, water and stormwater improvements needed to support urban development in the River Terrace and South Cooper Mountain community plan areas. The City of Beaverton believes it is critical that the two jurisdictions coordinate particularly closely in the analysis of transportation and utilities, and cooperate with partner jurisdictions and districts to find solutions to meet the challenges we face in providing services to these urbanizing areas. It would be mutually beneficial for the cities to work together on developing financing strategies to take advantage of economies of scale and spread the costs of infrastructure over a larger area. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on Tigard's proposed Comprehensive Plan Text Changes. We look forward to coordinating with you as both cities move forward with their respective planning efforts. Sincerely/ � ,� � � � ' �� !/ �� Steven Sparks, AI Planning Manager MAILING / NOTIFICATION RECORDS q AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING = � ,� �:��x�� ; e � � I,Darren Wyss,being first duly sworn/affixm,on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Planner for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below} ❑x NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR: CPr1 2012-00002 Ado�t West Bull Mountain Conce�t Plan Recommended Land Uses and rlssociated Policies � AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) HEARING BODY: HEARING DATE: ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer � Tigard Planning Commission Monday, December 3, 2012 � Tigard City Council Tuesday, December 11, 2012 A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit "A" and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown attached and by reference made a part hereof, on December 13, 2012,and deposited in the United States Mail on December 13; 2012,postage prepaid. � s �,�/ � (Person that Prepared Notice) STATE OF OREGON Counry of Washington ss. City of Tigard ,�r{. Subscribed and swom/affirmed before me on the�day of n�%��L 2- , 2012. �� OFFICIAL SEAL ;� =Fi1RLEY�TREAT p�� NOtARY PUBIJC•OREOdi �� NOTARY PUB IC nF OREGON w�r coN++unssioN��REa.iu.r oe,2o�s / i My Commission Expires: ��P/1 S ��.vb�'T � 120 DAYS = N/A ,� DATE MAILED: 12-13-2012 ' `�� • ,. CITY OF TIGARD � ~~ � � Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE CITY COUNCIL Case Number: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPAI 2012-00002 Case Name: ADOPT WEST BULL MT. CONCEPT PLAN RECOMMENDED LAND USES AND ASSOCIATED POLICIES Applicant's Name/Address: Ci of TiQard 13125 S�}U Hall Boulevard Tigard OR 97223 Owner's Names/Addresses: N A Address of Property: Rivcr Terrace Area A FINAL ORDER INCORPORATTNG THE FACTS, FINDINGS RND CONCLUSIONS APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A COMPREHENSIVE PLt1N AMENDMENT(ORDINANCE N0.12-121• THE CITY OF TIGARD PI.ANNING COMIvIISSION AND CITY COUNCIL HAVE REVIEWED THE APPLICANT'S PLANS, NARRATIVE, MATERIAI-S, AND COMI��NTS OF REVIEWING AGENCIES, THE PLANNING DIVISION'S STAFF REPORT AND RECOMIv1ENDATIONS FOR THE APPLICAT'ION DESCRIBED IN FURTFIER DETAIL IN THE STAFF REPORT. THE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY ON December 3, 2012 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING A RECOMIv�NDATION TO THE CITY COLJNCIL ON THE REQUEST. THE CITY COUNCIL r'1L.S0 HELD PUBLIC HEARINGS TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY ON December 11,2012 PRIOR TO MAKING A DECISION ON THE REQUEST. THIS DECISION HAS BEEN BASED ON THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS CONTAINED WITHIN THIS FINr1L ORDER. Subject: ➢ To amend the current Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map to include map designations for the River Terrace Community Plan area based on recommended land uses found in Washington County's West Bull Mt. Concept Plan; to amend the current Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goal 14:Urbanization goals,policies,and recommended action measures.The complete text of the Amendment can be viewed on the City's website at http://www•rigard- or.gov/code_amendments. AT THE 12/11/12 CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING,THE COUNCIL UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THIS REQUEST (Ordinance No. 12-12). ZONES: N/A APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18380 and 18.390;Comprehensive Plan Goals 1,2, 5,6,7, 8,9, 10, 11, 12, 13,and 14;Metro Urban Growth Funcuonal Plan Tide 11;and Statewide Planning Goals 1,2,5,6,7,8,9, 10,11, 12,13,and 14. A roval with Amendments ❑ Denial Action: ➢ � Approval as Requested ❑ PP Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper,posted aI tere ed Pa tre�ed to: � Affected Government Agencies � Final Decision: THIS IS THE FINAL DECISION BY THE CITY AND IS EFFECTIVE ON January 10, 2012. The adopted findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the City of Tigard Planning Division,Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, Oregon. Appeal: A review of this decision may be obtained by filing a norice of intent with the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) within 21 days according to their procedures. Questions: Call the City of Tigard Planning Division or the City Recorder at (503) 639-4171. ��k�6;� 3 Exhibit B: Persons Sent Notice of Final Order by the City Council CPA2012-00002 Gretchen Buehner 13249 SW 136th PI Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Robinson Perkins Coie 1120 NW Couch St,Tenth Floor Portland, OR 97209 City of Beaverton ATTN: Steven Sparks 4755 SW Griffith Dr Beaverton, OR 97076 Washington County Dept Land Use and Transportation ATTN: Paul Schaefer 155 N First Ave, Suite 350-14 Hillsboro, OR 97124 Metro Land Use & Planning ATfN: Gerry Uba 600 NE Grand Ave Portland, OR 97232 ODOT Region 1 ATTN: Carl Torland 123 NW Flanders Portland, OR 97209 �. �� . . - , . , � REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: November 8, 2012 TO: Name FR01�1: Cit��of Tigard Planning Division STAFF Darren W�s,Senior Planner (x2442� CONTr�CT: Phone: (503) 718-2442, Fax: (503) 718-2748, Email: darren�a ti�a,� rd-or.gov COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA) 2012-00002 - ADOPT WEST BULL MT CONCEPT PLAN RECOMMENDED LAND USES AND ASSOCIATED POLICIES - REQUEST: To amend the current Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map to include map designations for the River "I'errace Community Plan area based on recommended land uses found in Washington County's West Bull Mt. Concept Plan; to amend the current Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goal 14: Urbanization goals, policies, and recommended action measures. LOCATION: River Terrace Area ZONE: N /A APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380 and 18.390; Comprehensive Plan Goals 1, 2, 5, G, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ,12, 13,and 14;Metro Functional Plan Title 11;and Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 5, 6,7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14. Attached are the Applicant's Materials for your review. From informarion supplied by various departments and agencies and from other informarion available to our staff, a re�ort and recommendanon will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on thc proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this applicarion, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: November 23, 2012. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to res�ond b� the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above �vith your comments and confirm your comments in wriring as soon as possible. If you have any quesrions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: _ We havc reviewed t�ie prop�sal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter or email. _ Written comments provided below: Name&Number of Person Commenting: Easy�Peef�i.abel� � ��' Bend along line to �AVERY�5�61� ; Use Aver�W Template 5161� d Paper �� expvse Pop Edge•"" � Planning Manager Dep Fire Marshall John Wolff Tualatin Hills Parks& Rec District NF&R North Division 15707 SW Walker Road 14480 SW Jenkins Rd Beaverton, OR 97006 Beaverton, OR 97005-1152 Administrative Office Dev Svcs Dept David Schweitzer/SWM Program Tualatin Valley Water District Clean Water Services 1850 SW 170th Ave 2550 SW Hillsboro Hwy Beaverton, OR 97006 Hillsboro,OR 97123 Planning Mgr Steven Sparks City Manager Dave Wells City of Beaverton City of King City PO Box 4755 15300 SW 116th Ave Beaverton, OR 97076 King City,OR 97224 0. Gerald Uba, PhD Asst District MgrChad.Gordon Metro Land Use & Planning ODOT, Region 1, District 2A 600 NE Grand Ave 6000 SW Raab Rd Portland, OR 97232-2736 Portland, OR 97221 Mara Ulloa Dev Review Coord Carl Torland OR Dept of Land Conservation & Dev ODOT Region 1 635 Capitol St NE Suite 150 123 NW Flanders Salem, OR 97301-2540 Portland, OR 97209-4037 Paul Shaefer Teri Brady, Adm Ofcs WACO DLUT Tigard/Tualatin School District 23J 155 N First Ave 6960 SW 5andburg St Hillsboro, OR 97124 Tigard, OR 97223-8039 Jennifer Garland, Demographics Beaverton School District 16550 SW Merlo Rd Beaverton, OR 97006-5152 Etiquettes faciies a pefer ♦ ; Repliez�le hachure afin de www,avery.com � U�ilis�z le qabarit AVERY�5161� Sens de chargement j reveler le rebord Pop-upT"' 1-800-GO-AVERY j „ Ciry of Tigard ' ' CPA2012-00002 .�r:.,... �'�� Proposed Tigard Comprehensive Plan Text Changes E:� t �c� x..adx �«.v�` .� The City of Tigard proposes to amend the Goal 14: Urbanizarion chapter of its comprehensive plan to include the policies below. The policies will be located under e�sting Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goal 14.3. The policies are intended to provide guidance during the preparation and after adoprion of the River Terrace Community Plan. 5. Metro brought areas known as Area 63,Area 64 and Roy Rogers West Area within the Urban Growth Boundary. Thesc areas are known as the River Terrace Community Planning area. The City of Tigard shall be the designated service provider for the area. 6. The City shall prepare and adopt a River Terrace Communiry Plan for the area. The basis for the River Terrace Community Plan shall be the land use designarions from the West Bull Mountain Concept Plan. Refinements to the West Bull Mountain Concept Plan shall be considered during the public planning process for the River Terrace Community Plan. 7. The City shall idenrify appropriate urban zoning districts and regularions as part of the R.iver Terrace Community Plan,which shall comply with the Statewide Planning Goals and the Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan. 8. The City shall defer land use and zoning decisions within the area to Washington County, as outlined in the Intergovernmental Agreement dated April 24, 2012,unril the River Terrace Community Plan is adopted. 9. If all areas are not annexed by the City by the time the River Terrace Community Plan is adopted, the City shall seek an amendment to the Intergovernmental Agreement of Apri124, 2012 transferring land use and zoning responsibility for the River Terrace Community Planning area, including unincorporated areas, to the City. 10. Once the River Terrace Community Plan is adopted, and upon annexation to the City,urban zoning districts shall be adopted for these areas. If unincorporated areas remain,rural zoning shall be retained for these areas. 11. The City shall prepare a public facilities plan and an infrastructure financing plan as part of the River Terrace Community Plan. 12. No application of City zoning or development shall be approved by the city within the River Terrace Communiry Plan Area until such time as a full analysis under the Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) (OAR 660-012-0060),which shall includc a transportation funding strategy prepared in coordination with Washington County,has been completed and approved for the River Terrace Community Plan Area by the City. The funding strategy should identify transportation V. � improvements proposed to resolve transportation system impacts generated by development of the River Terrace Community Area, the responsible parry for constructing improvements, their associated cost estimates and public and/or private funding sources,including sources that may be specified by any applicable memoranda of understanding or development agreement. If the funding strategy includes transportation Supplemental Development Charges,it should identify the process and tiinulg for their approval and implementation. //��ll/_��►iP.��%�_�I•�i%i1�/�11� N� � � � • � . / • . � � 1 1 1111 � � TIGARD � �= :%IqG�" ----' �� I� "%i / '`� �„-- - . a �� ,.,.,,,,, �:iiii � / – . � _=e�: �:�`:G i - 1�� ■ �'��ei%:° '' = ��:r�i �, 11�/�■ ■ �� _ �Q�� 1111.__ � � ��i n uruw �� _ . =�III��i ` ��i`. �,��■numn�� qun . Z �i ��I��C uq��11 �il1�m - . �. -. � - . . . _ �� II� /1111111 11111111t , ,,• '�•►��11►��+1111111� • . • • • ' �f U�� ►�IIIID■ ��r�/III��'.Tii IIIIIIII • �- N ��►��Illlllq��j/1111111 . � ��►��1111111��11111 -• �- :Q ■ ■��C��111111 �_ - � _ /��%11111 C%1111111111 • �- � � �umuum�.uuumu�� nu �==uum� um�_��► �i � 11�� .��1111111�111111� � - • •• ••• • - _� :�� .--- _��__�'- - ..�� ■--�uun � -— � ��'-•'�'��I� �C�� ••- •. - �j ��. ��`�� ■ � ::i�w�%1��: ` • • � _ —L.�1111111111111� � �ru�r - -�i�1�un�11��,' � . . . _ � � .,L�.,`��'�� I �� ►�� ■ � ._ . :. ._ i � ��■ ■�►�� i � .,■ ._ . :. ._ � �'•�■:�`�:� � �►�� .li�� , . . :. .. ;5 � ,..,: _.,,....,.,..,� � .., .._ � .� � �: ��uuruuu:�� : �� uu u��■� i� � � � � dr � .�u��mm i�'� � � ��■ �� . ��n u�muuu��;,', �Inm� uun�� ■ � ��i��■��■ :�ii� n�;■■■■�■�� I Ilmu��• 1►� 1 ��ii� iiiii��S�1 ■�� _ ��I'1�� , ......■ r��i//� ■ �� t��i:� � jj � � ' �nni: �� / ,�. , ► � � m��■11A� ' � � /' � ��\� �/ �II!,•�1 � ' � � ��I��.�I�� %' - � ` ♦ === --- -� � ' � �i�� === ��, ��......��.....:_= ■ �: ��;11 :�;�:i I�'. ;,=��II��Ii � ��Ir�. ♦ �i :�,;.-►�. ..�..... , �,�. ,::■■►. '' ii�iiii i�'•i=::•►_. ' ■ ��-='`� .....■� , �.�■ �.�i�� =i;�r� __�.. � u��: =i�� , ��wu��ni� .I .. 1, � ■t'�_ � C011AMUNITY SPAPEI�S 6605 SE Lake Aoed,Portlaad,08 81222"PO BoX 22108 Par�sed DA 97289-2109 Pbo�o:503-684�0380 Fax:503-620�3433 E-�eil:legela�cemm�errsp�pers.cs� i�FFIGAVI i OF PUBLiCATION State of Oregon, County of Washington, SS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM: I, Charlotte Allsop, being the first duly swom, The following will be considered by the depose and say that I am the Accounting .� TiQard Planning Commission on Mondav Manager of The Times (serving Tigard, . December 3.2012 at 7:00 PM and the TiPard Tualatin & Sherwood), a newspaper of ' City Council on Tuesdav.December I1,2012 at 7:30 PM at the Tigard Civic Center-Town general circulation, published at Tigard, in the . � � kiall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon. aforesaid county and state, as defined by Public oral or written testimony is invited: ORS 193.010 and 193.020, that The public hearing on this matter will be held under Title 18 and rules of procedure adopted by the CounciI City of Tigard and available at Ciry Hall or the rules of procedure set forth Notice of Public Hearing—CPA2012-00002 in Section 18.390.O60.E. The Planning Commission's review TT11736 is for the purpose of making a recommendation to the City Council on the request. The Council will then hold a publiC hearing on the request prior to making a decision. A Copy of whiCh is hereto annexed, was Further information may be obtained from the City of Tigard published in the entire issue of said � Planning Division(Staff contact: Darren Wyss)at 13125 SW newspaper for Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 or by calling 503-718-2442. 1 week in the following issue: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMF.NT November 15, 2012 (CPA)2012-00002 -TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 1 TO ADOPT WEST BULL MOUNTAIN CONCEPT PLAN , ,j � RECOMMENDED LAND USES AND ASSOCIATED �l� �( �k}-� c,\ � POLICIES— Charlotte Allsop (Accounting Ma ager) REQUEST: To amend the current Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map to include map designations for the River Terrace Subscribed and sworn to before me this Community Plan area based on recommended land uses found November 15, 2012. in Washington County's West Bull Mt.Concept Plan;t�amend the current Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goal 14: Urbanizatio�t goals, policies, and recommended action measures. Th� � � ' � complete text of the proposed amendment can be viewed ,�(� % �� on the City's website at http:Uwww.tigard-or.gov/code', N ARY PUBLIC FOR OREGON amendments. LOCATION: River Terrace Commumty Pla� commission expires > > l Area ZONE: N/A APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIAi �� Community Development Code Chapters 18380 and 18.39� Comprehensive Plan Goals 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ,12, 13� ACCt#10093001 and 14;Metro Functional Plan Title 11;and Statewide Plannin Attn: Chris Wiley Goals 1,2,5,6,7,8,9, 10, 11, 12, 13,and 14. City of Tigard Publish 11/15/2412. TT1173 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 Size: 2 x 5.5 Amount Due: 91.85' "Pfease remit to address above. OFFICIAL SEAL JAl1iAE N MC CASLIN NOTARY PUBUC-OREGON COMMISSION NO.485952 MY COMMISSION D(PIqES FEBRUARY 20,2018 N AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING ' � � . I, C(cristine`GV'rley, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a SeniorAdministrativeSpeciaGstfor the �'ity of 7'igar� �lNas(tington County, Oregon and that I served the following: {Check Appropnate Box(s)Below} x❑ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR:� '� CPA 2012-00002, November I S, 2012 Adopt West Bull Mountain fonce�t Plan Recommended land Utes and Assaciated Policies � AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) HEARING BODY: HEARING DATE: ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer � Tigard Planning Commission Monday, December 3, 2012 � Tigard City Council Tuesday, December 11, 2012 A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhlblt"A" and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown attached and by reference made a part hereof, on November 15,2012, and deposited in the United States Mail on November15,2012, postage prepaid. � ( erson that Pre ar d Notice) ,S'�'A?E O�'O��ON � C�nty of'Washsngton )ss. Ci�j►of�Irgard ) fi� r — Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the /S day of �0(�Gl��— , 2012. �s OFF�GK SEAL �,1'Lc.�C.r lHIRtE114 TAEI►T `t ,.. �TARY PUBLIC•ORECiA1 ' COAAMIS310N N0�45984d Mv con,n�as�o�v��es.,u�v os.�m s My Commission Expires: ��l��l� NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE,LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER THE TTGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIItES TT�AT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTTCE, n IT SHAI.L BE PROMI''IZY FORWARDED TO'I�PURCHASER. ; . � PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BEFORE THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION ON MONDAY, DECEMBER 3, 2012, AT 7:00 PM, AND BEFORE THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 11, 2012. AT 7:30 PM. THE PUBLIC HEARINGS WILL BE CONDUCTED IN THE TOWN HAI.L OF THE TIGARD CNIC CENTER AT 13125 SW HAI.L BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223. THESE HEARINGS ARE FOR THE PURPOSE OF RECEIVING TESTIMONY FROM THE PUBLIC. Why d.id I get this notice?: The City is beginning the process to refine the West Bull Mt Concept Plan into the River Terrace Community Plan.To acknowledge the investment and involvement in completing the concept plan,and to set expectations for the comtnunity plan process,the City proposes to adopt the concept plan recornmended land uses into the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map.The City also proposes to adopt policies into the Tigard Comprehensive Plan to provide guidance during the prepazation and after the adoption of the River Terrace Communiry Plan.The proposed amendments will not change the zoning or allowed uses of properties located in the planning area,nor will it allow urban level development until the River Terrace Community Plan is complete and adopted by the Tigatd City Council. FILE NOS.: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA) 2012-00002 FILE TITLE: ADOPT WEST BULL MT. CONCEPT PLAN RECOMMENDED LAND USES AND ASSOCIATED POLICIES APPLICANT: City of Tigard 13]25 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: To amend the current Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map to include map designations for the River Terrace Community Plan area based on recommended land uses found in Washington County's West Bull Mt. Concept Plan; to amend the current Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goal 14: Urbanization goals, policies, and recommended acrion measures. The complete text of the proposed Code Amendment can be viewed on the City's website at http://www.tigard-or.gov/code_amendments. LOCATION: River Terrace Communiry Plan Area ZONE: N/A APPLICABLE Communiry Development Code Chaprers 18.380 and 18.390;Comprehensive Plan Goals 1, 2, 5, 6, REVIEW 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ,12, 13, and 14;Metro Functional Plan Title 11; and Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 5, CRITERIA: 6, 7, 8,9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.390.O60.E OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HAI.L. ASSISTNE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRE'TERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL 503-G39-4171, EXT'. 2438 (VOICE) OR 503-684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR T'HE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. PUBLIC ORAL OR WRITTEN TESTIMONY IS INVITED. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CI'TY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH OR.AL AND WRITTEN T'ESTIMONY. THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATTON OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. THE PURPOSE OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S REVIEW IS TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL. THE COUNCIL WILL THEN HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ITEM AT A LATER DATE. AT.T• DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FNE CENTS (25G) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (� DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING,A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25�) PER PAGE,OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER DA.RREN WYSS AT 503-718-2442 (TIGARD CITY HALI,, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223) OR BY EMAIL TO darren e,tieard-or.�;ov. DON & DOROTHY ERDT 7he following labels list mterested persons who requested noUCe 13760 SW 1215T AVENUE re:ANY development ANYWHERE in Tigard. See Memo for File �e TIGARD OR 97223 Interested Parties Update,August 2012. BARRY ALBERTSON VANESSA FOSTER 15445 SW 150T"AVE 13085 SW HOWARD DR TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 SUSAN BEILKE 11755 SW 114T" PLACE TIGARD OR 97223 ELLEN BEILSTEIN BEVERLY FROUDE 14630 SW 139T"AVE 12200 SW BULL MOUNTAIN ROAD TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 HEIDI BRENNEMAN NAOMI GALLUCCI 11680 SW TIGARD DRIVE 11285 SW 78T"AVENUE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 GRETCHEN BUEHNER CPO 46 MAILING ADDRESS 13249 SW 136T" PLACE 16200 SW PACIFIC HWY, STE H, BOX 242 TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 REX CAFFALL KEVIN HOGAN 13205 SW VILLAGE GLENN 143357 SW 133R0 AVENUE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 LORA GARLAND, CITY RECORDS HAROLD AND RUTH HOWLAND CITY OF TIGARD 13145 SW BENISH 13125 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 PATRICIA KEERINS NOTE:*Don't mail the City of Tigard label 12195 SW 121ST AVE if there is already a label for City of Tigard TIGARD OR 97223 printed from the GIS labels list. /CURPLN/SetUp/Labels/CIT Citywide Last Update:O8 21 2012 ALEXANDER CRAGHEAD JULIE RUSSELL,CPO 46 CHAIR 12205 SW HALL BOULEVARD 12662 SW TERRAVIEW DRIVE TIGARD OR 97223-6210 TIGARD OR 97224 GENE MILDREN BRAD SPRING MILDREN DESIGN GROUP 7555 SW SPRUCE STREET 7650 SW BEVELAND ST, STE 120 TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 NATHAN AND ANN MURDOCK CHARLIE AND LARIE STALZER 7415 SW SPRUCE STREET 14781 SW JULIET TERRACE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 PATTY NEWTH ROSS SUNDBERG 12180 SW MERESTONE COURT 16382 SW 104T"AVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 TODD HARDING & BLAKE HERING JR. JOSH THOMAS NORRIS BEGGS&SIMPSON 10372 SW BONANZA WAY 121 SW MORRISON, SUITE 200 TIGARD OR 97224 PORTLAND OR 97204 SHANNEN WILLIAMS RAPPOLD DAVIO WALSH MARKETING/BUSINESS DEV MGR 10236 SW STUART COURT PERLO CONSTRUCTION TIGARD OR 97223 7190 SW SANDBURG ST PORTLAND OR 97223 BRIAN WEGENER SUE RORMAN 9830 SW KIMBERLY DRIVE 11250 SW 82ND AVE TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 LISA HAMILTON, CPO 46 VICE CHAIR 13565 SW BEEF BEND ROAD TIGARD OR 97224 /CURPLN/SetUp/Labels/CIT Citywide Last Update:08 21 2012 14888 SW SOPIA LN LLC ABBOTT FAMILY TRUST 1719 SW JOSHUA ST 14887 SW 162ND TERRACE PORTLAND OR 97219 TIGARD OR 97224 ABE,ALBERT T& PATSY H JOINT RE ABUNNADI,KAZEM M 14975 SW WOODHUE ST 14925 SW HUNTWOOD CT TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 ACHOUR, KHALED M&TAMI M AITCHISON,STEVEN L&LAURA L 16450 SW MILAN ST 16403 SW LEEDING LN TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 AKIYAMA,JAMES ALALI, MOHAMMAD A GH 13070 SW ROSHAK RD PO BOX 8310 TIGARD OR 97223 SALMIYA 20054 ALBERTSON, BARRY D& LESLIE, ROBIN R ALBRIGHT,GARY S ALBRIGHT,ZONIA GEORGINA 15445 SW 150TH AVE 14014 SW 164TH AVE TIGARD OR 97224 PORTLAND OR 97224 ALDER HOMES INC ALLISON, ERIK PO BOX 2189 16450 SW LORENZO LN BEAVERTON OR 97075 TIGARD OR 97223 ALTEMOSE, KIM&JULIE AMARAVATHI,SIVANAND 14935 SW WOODHUE ST 6326 SW BONITA RD#H 104 TIGARD OR 97224 LAKE OSWEGO OR 97035 AMIN, KIRANRAI AMIN, NILESH AMIN, PADMINA A 15302 SW BURGUNDY ST 139�5 SW FLORENTINE AVE TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 AMOS, PAUL D&EVELYN F AMPARAN, DAVID EL-HIZAWi,SALWA A 13985 SW FLORENTINE AVE 16390 SW DEKALB ST TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 AMSTAD,TONY AND DEEANN REVOC TRUST AMSTAD,WAYNE A&CORI A POB 890 15990 SW ROY ROGERS RD HERMISTON OR 97838 SHERWOOD OR 97140 ANDERSON, KEVIN S&JAMIE D ANDERSON, RAYMOND D&MARGARET E 14955 SW JULIET TERR 16393 SW KESSLER LN TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 ANDERSON,THOMAS B&JENNIFER ANDHOLE,RA1 K&PULAKANTI, NIRMALA 16266 SW DEKALB ST 16410 SW TUSCANY ST TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 ARBOR POINTE HOA 735 SW 158TH AVE BEAVERTON OR 97006 ARBOR ROAD LLC BY WEST HILLS DEVELOPMENT CO 735 SW 158TH AVE BEAVERTON OR 97006 ARC 150TH LLC ARMSTRONG,JONAE 9375 SW COMMERCE CIR#7 16283 SW STAHL DR WILSONVILLE OR 97070 TIGARD OR 97223 ARMSTRONG, MICHAEL MATZKE, RAMONA ARNOLD, DAVID L TR&GLORIA S 15268 SW BURGUNDY ST 16315 SW RHUS CT TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 ASWAT,SALIM &AQUILA FAMILY TRU AVOLIO LIVING TRUST BY AVOLIO,GERALD P&JANET TRS 16176 SW KESSLER LN 16650 SW BULL MOUNTAIN RD TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 AVOLIO LIVIN6 TRUST BY AVOLIO,GERALD P&JANET L TRS AYALA,SEMON J 1R&JEANNE F 16650 SW BULL MOUNTAIN RD 16278 SW 0'NEILL CT TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 BACON, BRADLEY S&SARAH J BAGGENSTOS, EDWARD C&CAROL J TRUSTEES 16438 SW O'NEILL CT 158015W ROY ROGERS RD TIGARD OR 97223 SHERWOOD OR 97140 BAGGENSTOS,JAMES K& DARLA A BAKER, RONALD E TRUST BAKER, NORA L TRUST 15252 SW ROY ROGERS RD 15200 SW BURGUNDY ST SHERWOOD OR 97140 TIGARD OR 97224 BANH,THANH& NERLITA REV LIV TR BANNON,STEVEN J&LAURIE E 201 CRABAPPLE DR 15936 SW DEKALB ST SITKA AK 99835 TIGARD OR 97224 BARECH, INAYATULLAH KHAN &AROOS BARNACHEA,JOHNNY 0& DAWN F 16310 SW PALERMO LN 14665 SW 163RD AVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 BARNEY,CARYN M &JEFFREY M BARRETT, KRISTA&RICHARD F 16410 SW MILAN ST 16455 SW MIIAN ST TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 BARTON,GREGORY LANCE&JULIE ANN BAXTER,TERRANCE 0 14933 SW SaPHIA LN 14875 SW COPPER HILL LN TIGARD OR 97224 TI6ARD OR 97224 BEADNELL, RICKY&JOYCE REV LIV BEADNELL,STEVEN M&DENNEL W 15898 SW DOZIER WAY 15531 SW BURGUNDY ST TI6ARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 BEARDSLEY,JAMES J& MICHELE L BEATY,MICHAEL R&NATALIE N 16720 SW fRIENDLY LN 14895 SW 163RD AVE BEAVERTON OR 97007 TIGARD OR 97224 BEAVERTON,CITY OF PO BOX 4755 BEAVERTON OR 97076 BELL,ROBERT P AND MARY L 14970 SW 150TH TIGARD OR 97223 BELLAIRS, BRIAN W&KATHLEEN G BEMIS,ADAM L&AMY L 20253 SW INGLIS DR 15789 SW HUNTWOOD PL BEAVERTON OR 97007 TIGARD OR 97224 BENTON, GLENDA B&WINSTON B BERG,TYLER BERG,AIMEE 14656 SW 164TH AVE 16185 SW HAZELTINE LN TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 BHATTARAI,SHREEKAR BHATTARAI, LISA BJERG,JA50N A 16457 SW SPINDLER CT 14842 SW WOODHUE ST TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 BLACKSHER, PEREZ& HANKS, PAMELA J BLAIR, BENJAMIN A& LINDA M 16332 SW LEADING LN 16381 SW BRAY LN TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 BONCIOLINI, DENNIS J&SUZANNE B BOOTHBY,DARRIN F& MEGAN M 14835 SW HAWK RIDGE RD 14905 SW WOODHUE ST TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 BORCHARDT,SCOTT E/VICKI A BOSTON,TRACEY& BOSTON, MARA 16415 SW CROMWELL CT 16297 SW SNAPDRAGON LN TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 BOTAITIS,WILLIAM JOHN& REBECCA BOWERS,JOSEPH H MORELAND-BOWERS, MONA L 16115 SW KESSLER LN 14832 SW HUNTWOOD CT TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 BOWKER,GUY M & PAMELA J BOX, DEBRA S& DENISE L 15394 SW BURGANDY 16114 SW DEKALB ST PORTLAND OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 BRADFORD,JOSHUA D&JILL A BRASHLER, MICHAEL G 16451 SW O'NEILL CT 15327 SW CABERNET DR TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 BRITTON,CHARLES H&ABIGAIL S BRITZ FAMILY TRUST BY BRITZ, DONAVAN A& DOREEN A TRS 14928 SW ROSARIO LN 14831 SW 154TH TER TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 BROHOSKI, MICHAEL C BRUINIER,KURT L&NANCY J 15756 SW HUNTWOOD PL 15525 SW BEEF BEND RD TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 BRUNER, WARD H AND VICKIE M BRUSSEAU, ROBERT G&RENEE L 16355 SW RHUS CT 14972 SW ROSARIO LN TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 BRYANT,JONATHAN H& PATRICIA K BRYANT,WILLIAM I AND KATHY S 14990 SW 161ST AVE 14460 SW 164TH TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 BUI, LOI VAN& NGUYEN, LANH THI BULKLEY,SCOTT A 16390 SW TUSCANY ST 14940 SW ROSARIO LN TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 BURKE, STEVEN C& DARCY E BURKHOLDER, MATT E MCCARDELL, ERIKA 16287 SW LANIER LN 16288 SW DEKALB ST TI6ARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 BURNELL, CONSTANCE E BUSCHER, RICHARD F PO BOX 892 14185 SW 164TH AVE SHERWOOD OR 97140 TIGARD OR 97224 BUSTER, ROBERT&MARYANNE CAHILL,NORBERT A&MARGARET ANN 16322 SW STAHL DR 16342 SW 0'NEILL CT PORTLAND OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 CAMARDA, RICHARD A CAMERON LIVING TRUST BY CAMERON,JEFFREY 5&SUSAN K TRS 14532 SW 164TH AVE 14943 SW 154TH TER TIGARD OR 97�24 TIGARD OR 97224 CARLSON, RICHARD 16109 SW KESSLER LN TIGARD OR 97224 CARPENTER,JON A CARTER,BREANN 1 WEAVER,JEFF 14953 SW 162ND TER 13950 SW VENEZIA TER TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 CARVER,THOMAS GWYNN &TIJEN CHAN, KENNY KOWK KEUNG VU, RACHAEL HONG HA THI 16172 SW DEKALB ST 15310 SW MALLARD DR,STE 104 TIGARD OR 97224 BEAVERTON OR 97007 CHAN,YU CHAU LEE, MING YOKE CHANG,SUNG K&JONG H 16370 SW MILAN ST 16390 SW MILAN ST PORTLAND OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 CHANK, LAWRENCE M CHAPPELLE LIVING TRUST BY CHAPPELLE,JONATHAN &TANYA L 44-919 GOLF CENTER PKWY STE 7 14853 SW 163RD AVE INDIO CA 92201 TIGARD OR 97224 CHAPPELLE,JONATHAN M &TANYA L CHIARI,THEO P&XIE-CHIARI,QIAO HONG 14853 SW 163RD AVE 16310 SW ONEIL CT TIGARD OR 97224 TI6ARD OR 97223 CHILAKALA, MALLIKARJUNA RAO VETCHA, PADMA R CHISM, MARK E&HEATHER J 16455 SW TUSCANY ST 14895 SW HAWKRIDGE RD PORTLAND OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 CHONG, IN YONG &SOOK WON CHONG,SUN TAEK&KON RAE 14866 SW SOPHIA LN 7810 SW MILLER HALL RD TIGARD OR 97224 ALOHA OR 97007 CHOUM, KATHERINE R UNG,SEREIKHLARUM CHOW, PETER&JANET 16430 SW MILAN ST 146915W 163RD AVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 C}iRISTENSEN,STEVENL&JEANNEE(7-IWSTENSENFAMILYTRUST CLAIRMONT-STEELE, KELLYA 15642 SW 149TH PL 16388 SW BRAY LN TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 CLARK,JEFFERY JAN &CARMEN K CLARK, LEALYN PAUL III FOX,ALLISON M 15234 SW BURGUNDY ST 15650 SW BURGANDY ST TIGARD OR 97224 PORTLAND OR 97224 CLARK, ROBERT JOHN &SUE RENE CLARKE,WILLIAM D& BRIDGET S 15602 SW 149TH PL 13532 SW ROSHAK RD TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 CLAUSEN, GREGORY&JANET REVOCAB CLAYTON, MICHAEL B&SUZY 14876 SW 161ST AVE 16455 S LORENZO LN TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 CLEAN WATER SERVICES 25505W HILLSBORO HWY HILLSBORO OR 97123 COLCLOUGH, DEREK ANDERS90N-COLCLOUGH, MARY JANALEE 13855 SW FLORENTINE AVE TIGARD OR 97223 COLEMAN, BROCK R&SHAWN MARIE COLLINS,SHARI K 15672 SW 149TH PL 16433 SW SPINDLER CT TIGARD OR 97224 TI6ARD OR 97224 COLQUITT, ROSA M CONWAY, MARY JOANN &CONWAY,CURTIS ALLEN 13945 SW VENEZIA TER 13330 SW ROSHAK RD TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 COPPER HILL HOMEOWNERS ASSOC ATTN:TODD BOYCE CORNO,STEPHEN F MAXINE D 15455 NW GREENBRIER PKWY#140 16435 SW WOOD PLACE BEAVERTON OR 97006 TIGARD OR 97223 COTTRELLLMNGTRUSTBYSTEPHEN&KATHYNTTRELLTRS COX, ERNEST RUSSELL&COX, CHRISTOPHER ALEY 14400 SW 164TH AVE 15530 SW BURGANDY ST TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 CRESCENT GROVE CEMETERY ASSOCIAT 9925 SW GREENBUR6 RD TIGARD OR 97223 CRISCIONE, MICHAEL J&JOANNE E CRUFT,STEPHEN E&ELKE 16880 SW BULL MOUNTAIN RD 16359 SW LUKE LN TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 CULLIGAN,ANDREA LEIGH DAIM,YONCA&TUGRUL 13960 SW 164TH AVE 16125 5W KESSLER LN TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 DANG,THO V&TRAN,THO L DANIEL,WILLIAM A&REBECCA A 16435 SW LORENZO LN 14869 SW$OPHIA LN PORTLAND OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 DAWSON, KARL LEE&CINDY KAY DECK,IEFFREY H&KIMBERLY H 14752 SW ROSARIO LN 14929 SW 164TH AVE TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 DELLAVEDOVA,JAMES R&SHEILA M DELVALLE,ROBERT A JR TRUST 15856 SW DOZIER WAY 15878 DEKALB ST TIGARD OR 97224 PORTLAND OR 97224 DENARI,STEVEN E & DENARI,CASSONDRA ANDERSON DEUTH, LANCE R&ANGELA M 13785 SW FLORENTINE AVE 15361 SW CABERNET DR TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 DIBBLE,JAMES&SHELLIE DICKSON FAMILY PROPERTIES LLC 13925 SW 163RD TER 11195 NE HWY 240 TIGARD OR 97223 YAMHILL OR 97148 DIETRICH, PETER DILLINGHAM,JUSTIN J&AMANDA 14554 SW 164TH AVE 14932 SW SOPHIA LN TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 DITTMAN FAMILY TRUST 15120 SW 150TH AVE TIGARD OR 97224 DOMINICK, DAVID R&JULIE A DOTY,TROY D&ERIKA A 14869 SW HUNTWOOD CT 16144 SW HAZELTINE LN TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 DOUGLAS A&AN6ELA G COOK DRESSEL, KEVIN W&GILLIAN A 14993 SW 164TH AVE 15455 SW FINIS LN TIGARD OR 97224 PORTLAND OR 97224 DUAN,YAN YANG, NENGCHIANG DUDEY,JOAN M 16347 SW DEKALB ST 14485 SW 164TH AVE TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 DUEKER,JONATHAN SCOTT&ROBYN CHRISTINE DUFEK, LON P&AMY J 13101 SW ROSHAK RD 16394 SW STAHL DR TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 DUFFIN, RYAN &SARAH DUNN, DEVAN & KATHRYN ESTABROOK 16376 SW HAZELTINE LN 15776 SW HUNTWOOD PL TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 DURAZO,ARNOLD&JANET DYCHES FAMILY LLC 15989 SW TAYLOR LN 3208 SE 13TH AVE TIGARD OR 97224 PORTLAND OR 97202 ECKART,JONATHAN A&JESSICA EDGERTON,JEFFREY A&GAYLE A 16440 SW CROMWELL CT 14340 SW 164TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 EDMONDS,SCOTT& NANCY LIVING TR ENGEL,JOHN R&PAMELA E PO BOX 1612 13905 SW VENEZIA TER LAKE OSWEGO OR 97035 TIGARD OR 97223 ENGLISH,THOMAS M &SUSAN KD ENSINGER, KARMEN LEE 13915 SW FLORENTINE AVE 14360 SW 164TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 EPENETER PROPERTIES LLC EVANS,TYLER M&SHAWN R 10860 SW PARK ST 16386 SW LEEDING LN TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 EVETTS, BRENT K&TERRI L EZRA,SOLOMON 14930 SW BROOKLET PL 14906 SW BURGUNDY CT TIGARD OR 97224 PORTLAND OR 97224 FAKS,JALAL A FEENEY, BRIAN&1ENNIFER A 14888 SW BURGUNDY CT 13705 SW 163RD PL TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 FERRIS, IRENE C REVOCABLE LIVING FERRIS, RICK HAROLD&ELIZABETH 1591 NE 61ST AVE 17000 SW FRIENDLY LN HILLSBORO OR 97124 BEAVERTON OR 97007 FIAL,TERRANCE FIAL, CHARLENE FOGERTY, KATHLEEN J& BRUCE E 1652 PUANANALA ST 14827 SW WOODHUE 5T PEARL CITY HI 96782 TIGARD OR 97224 FORD, DERIK& ELIZABETH FORD, RICHARD F JR&DONNA L 15912 SW DOZIER WAY 14935 SW HAWK RIDGE RD TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 FOREMAN, ROBERT O/SUZAN R FORMAN,DUANE B&JO ANNE 15961 SW DOZIER WAY 15968 SW DOZIER WAY TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 FOWLER, KINTON J& PATTI G FRIEDMAN,SETH A 16170 SW HAZELTINE LN 7180 SW SANDBERG ST#100 TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 FRIEND,CHERIE L FRIGO, ELEONORA 40100 VIA TONADE 14511 SW 163RD AVE MURRIETA CA 92562 TIGARD OR 97224 FRITH,JAN REV LIVING TRUST GAO, HUGH H SUN,AMBER 15172 SW CABERNET DR 16359 SW LEEDING LN TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 GASPER, ROBERT C AND EARLENE J 14880 SW 150TH AVE TIGARD OR 97224 GAY, LAURA DINA ET AL GEORGE, DARYLL E&KARLI 20320 S DANNY CT 16326 SW GEARIN CT OREGON CITY OR 97045 TIGARD OR 97223 GHERASIM REVOCABLE TRUST GIAMMANCO, IAN &SARA A 16470 SW WOOD PL 16399 SW DEKALB ST TIGARD OR 97224 PORTLAND OR 97224 GIBSON, ROGER,ALLISON &ALEKSIC,SRDJAN GIESBRECHT,F BRUCE&SERENA L 11700 SW BUTNER RD#314 15275 SW FINIS LN PORTLAND OR 97225 TIGARD OR 97224 GILL, DANIEL E&SHARON J GRAF, DWIGHT D&BRENDA D 14877 SW TREVOR LN 16365 SW HOOPS CT TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 . GROOMS, MICHAEL R& NICOLE W 13248 SW ROSHAK RD TIGARD OR 97223 GRUN, PAUL A& ELIZABETH U GRUNDMANN,WILLIAM J/CHERI C 11852 SW ASPEN RIDGE DRIVE 15750 SW DEKALB ST TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 GUAN'S(USA)INC HACKENBERGER TRUST 2505 SW SPRING GARDEN#205 14915 SW HAWK RIDGE ROAD PORTLAND OR 97219 TIGARD OR 97223 HADGU,ALEM A HAGEL,SHAWN R& MICHAEL P 13965 SW VENEZIA TER 14979 SW 1ULIET TER TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 HAGEN, ERIC D& DEBRA K HALD,CHRISTIAN 14945 SW HAWK RIDGE RD 16316 SW LUKE LN TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 HANFORD,JERRY S& HANFORD, DEBORAH L HANLEY, DAWN NEWMAN, MARLENE 14925 SW HAWK RIDGE RD 14599 SW 163RD AVE TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 HARMON, DIXIE L HARRIS,GREGORY D 14293 SW ROY ROGERS RD 15279 5W CABERNET DR SHERWOOD OR 97140 TIGARD OR 97224 HARRIS, RANDY HARRIS,JULIE HARRISON,RICK&LAUNA J 14631 SW 164TH AVE 14062 SW 164TH AVE TIGARD OR 97224 PORTLAND OR 97224 HASHIMA,JASON NAOKI HASUIKE,ALAN&SUSAN REV LIVING 14825 SW BROOKLET PL PO BOX 667 TIGARD OR 97224 TUALATIN OR 97062 HASUIKE, MITSUKO HAUGEN, PAUL M&JILL D 15265 SW BEEF BEND RD 16333 SW STAHL DR TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 HAUNSPERGER FAMILY TRUST HAWKS,CHRISTOPHER& MARTA 15310 SW CABERNET DR 16146 SW DEKALB ST TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 HAYS,TIMOTHY A& HASUIKE,6RACE A HEASTON, ELLICE R&ROBERT E 15669 SW 149TH PL 14906 SW ROSARIO LN TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 HEITZHAUSEN,CHUCK& KATHY HELLER-STADING, KIMBERLY K HELLER-STADING, EILEEN L 16290 SW STAHL DR 14701 SW 163RD AVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 HEMSLEY,JOSHUA R DARAFEEV-HEMSIEY, NATALIE HENNINGER,MICHAEL C&DANA 15007 SW 148TH TER 16315 TUSCANY ST TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 HENRY, LARRY J& DEANNE L HESEMANN,JEFFREY J&NANCY A 16200 SW 150TH AVE 16367 SW BRAY LN TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 HIGHLAND, MARK R& MICHELLE A HILLEN, DAVID C&SUSAN M 14845 SW 150TH AVE 149215W JULIETTER TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 HIROMURA,SCOTT M KOHLER,STEPHANIE L HIRSCHMANN,ANDREAS&THERESA L 3262 SW 153RD AVE 14892 SW SOPHIA LN BEAVERTON OR 97006 TIGARD OR 97224 H0, PHILIP& MELISA HOANG, FRANK&ANNIE 16124 SW DEKALB ST 14600 SW 164TH AVE TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 HOLT,CONNIE S& ROY L HOM,ANGELA REV LIVING TRUST BY ANGELA HOM,TRUSTEE 15870 SW DOZIER WAY 14858 SW 161ST AVE TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 HONG, LINH &TONY HOOVER, KELVIN P& DONNA K 16415 SW TUSCANY ST 14955 SW SOPHIA LN TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 HOWE,JORDAN L& RACHAEL E HUCKEY, MICHAEL D& MARGARET M 16355$W COLONY PL 14854 SW SOPHIA LN TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 HULSE, BRANDT L& KARIN L HUPFERROBERTW&HEATHERAHERNSTEDT,CARLE&IffiLST 15975 SW 150TH AVE 15149 SW 161ST AVE TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 HUTCHINSON, ERIC E HYLAND,IAMES A&LINDA 15962 SW ENNA CT 14907 SW 164TH AVE TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 IBRAHIM,OTHMAN F INMAN,ARLIN C&INONIA LILLIAN 14881 SW HUNTWOOD CT 14934 SW HUNTWOOD CT TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97229 ITEL,THOMAS H JACOBS, LAWRENCE 1 15146 SW CABERNET DR 14011 SW ROY ROGERS RD TIGARD OR 97224 SHERWOOD OR 97140 JACOBSON,STEVEN K& BARBARA 15915 SW 150TH AVE TIGARD OR 97224 JAEGER,TIM R& KATIE E JANCOLA,THOMAS&CAROLYN 16330 SW PALERMO LN 14643 SW 163RD AVE TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 JAW PROPERTIES LLC JOHNSON, DANIEL R PO BOX 667 16147 SW KESSLER LN TUALATIN OR 97062 TIGARD OR 97224 JOHNSON, MARK D AND NANCY A JONES, RON&CHRIS FAMILY TRUST 14885 SW ROSARIO LN 13298 SW ROSHAK RD TIGARD OR 97224 TI6ARD OR 97223 JUN, HYUNHYO SIN,JEEHEE KADEL, ROGER A TRUST KADEL,IANET S TRUST 14845 SW HUNTWOOD CT 15475 SW 150TH AVE TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 KAMPSCHROEDER FAMILY TRUST KAPUR,SANJAY&SONIA 15113 SW CABERNET DR 14956 SW HUNTWOOD CT TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 KASIM, RAHIM KAUFMAN,JOHN S&SHARON C 14659 SW 164TH AVE 15567 SW BURGUNDY ST TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 KAYS, KIRSTEN&KAYS,STEVE KELLAR,VAN A& PATRICIA L 16364 SW GEARIN CT 16374 SW CROMWELL CT TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 KELLER,JEFFREY A& KIMBERLY A KERN, DAVID W&CHANDRA C 13143 SW ROSHAK RD 16121 SW HAZELTINE LN TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 KETCHUM, RAYMOND&JULIE 14830 SW HAWK RIDGE RD TIGARD OR 97224 KIEL,JAMES D&DANA M KIM,SOOGIL&SEJIN 13925 SW VENEZIA TER 13895 SW FLORENTINE AVE TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 KIM,YOUNG JIN bNG�JDWINGTRUSTBYbNCAID,OfiANq/bOROTFr(KTRS 15692 SW 149TH PL 16251 SW KEERINS CT TIGARD OR 97224 PORTLAND OR 97223 KING, RANDY A&ANGELA KINTON LAND&BISON LLC 15763 SW HUNTWOOD PL 18485 SW SCHOLLS FERRY RD TIGARD OR 97224 BEAVERTON OR 97007 KIRBY, PAUL& KAREN KIYOI, EDWARD A& MICHELLE L 15243 SW CABERNET DR 16382 SW STAHL DR TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 KNOX, DANIEL F&PATRICIA KOCHHAR,SANJIV K 15955 SW 150TH AVE 13765 FLORENTINE AVE TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 KOENIG, KARL& PATRICIA KRESL, LAURIE M 15709 SW 149TH PL 13169 SW R05HAK RD TIGARD�R 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 KRUEGER, RANDALL J&ADRIENNE C KU,STEPHEN&CHANG,JULIA 17815 79TH AVE CT E#31 16395 SW MILAN ST PUYALLUP WA 98375 TIGARD OR 97223 KUNTE,ABHUEET& RADHIKA KURTH, DAVID R& NANCY S 16450 SW TUSCANY ST 16361 SW CROMWELL CT TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 KWAK,SUNG SOO KWON,IUNG&S00 H 13890 SW VENEZIA TER 15954 SW DOZIER WAY TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 KWON,SUSIE S&YOUNG H L.L TRUST BY LANDI, LAURA TR 16298 SW DEKALB ST 17001 NW JOHNSON RD TIGARD OR 97224 HILLSBORO OR 97124 LAMB, MICHELLE D LANCASTER, DAVID G&MARSHA B 14918 SW HUNTWOOD CT 17740 SW SCHOLLS FERRY RD TIGARD OR 97224 BEAVERTON OR 97007 LANCASTER, MARSHA B LARSON, ERIC A&SHERRI ROBINSON 17514 SW SCHOLLS FY RD 15175 SW CABERNET DR BEAVERTON OR 97007 TIGARD OR 97224 LAWRANCE, HAROLD&ANNE M LEANDRES, DAVID M & DIANNE 16299 SW LANIER LN 14894 SW BURGANDY CT TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 LEAPTROTT,JEFFREY R&AMBER M LEBIEN, MICHELE&MAXWELL, PRESTON 16391 SW DEKALB ST 14901 SW SOPHIA LN TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 LEE, BRADLEY J &STACIE M LEE, LORIE 16380 SW HAZELTINE IN 16395 SW LORENZO LN TIGARD OR 97224 TI6ARD OR 97223 LEE, MARGOT N LEE,SOMNIT 16379 SW GEARIN CT 14942 SW BURGUNDY CT TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 LEE,SOO AH LEGRADY,DOUGLAS A& ELAINE K 14747 SW 163RD AVE 16460 SW HOOP CT TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 LENNAR NORTHWEST INC 2103 NE 129TH ST#100 VANCOUVER WA 98686 LENNAR NORTHWEST INC 12013 NE 99TH ST#1650 VANCOUVER WA 98682 LENZY, MELVIN C LERITZ-HIGGINS,PATRICIA&SARAH 16435 SW MILAN ST 16396 SW CROMWELL CT TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 LESLIE, IAN G&ELENA QUIROS LEW,TED 14945 SW WOODHUE ST 14920 SW 1615T AVE TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 LIANG, BINGBING DAVID, LARRY L LIBKE,VIRGIL E JOYCE H 13920 SW VENEZIA TER 14405 SW 164TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 LIM,ANDY&YOUSOOK 11NDSAYLMNGTRUSTBYALANC/AWSON WNDSAYTFtS 14821 SW HUNTWOOD CT 15884 SW DOZIER WAY TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 LIU,YI SUN, HANG LOCKWOOD,SCOTT&DOENENE 17568 ERIN CT 14892 SW HUNTWOOD CT LAKE OSWEGO OR 97035 TIGARD OR 97224 LOFFINK, LARRY E&CATHERINE E LONG,JOHN L& MAUREEN S TRUSTEES 16423 SW LUKE LN 16291 SW 0'NEILL CT TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 LUTZ,SUSAN MARY& NICHOLAS E LUU,THOAI&THU 14089 SW ROY ROGERS RD 14810 SW 162ND TER SHERWOOD OR 97140 TIGARD OR 97224 MACALALAD, HERNANDO E JR& EMILI MACK, DAVID S& DENNISE A 16323 O'NEILL CT 13725 SW 163RD PL TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 MAIDE,TIINA BRITTON,JAMES MAISONVILLE PHILIP MARCUS&NORMA J 16475 SW TUSCANY ST 16295 SW BECKY LANGE CT PORTLAND OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 MAK,GUSTAVO K& MIMI M MALONE, MATTHEW& LAUREN 14891 SW TREVOR LN P 0 BOX 3221 TIGARD OR 97224 PORTLAND OR 97208 MANAGER,VADA O HIDDEN CANYON MARECIC,JEFFREY M&MARECIC, MARYFRANCES L 744 E DESERT FLOWER LN 15877 SW DOZIER WAY PHOENIX AZ 85048 TIGARD OR 97224 MARGASON,GARY L& INGRID L MARSH,RON&GIORGIA 14884 SW ROSARIO LANE 16169 SW HAZELTINE LN TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 MARTIN, DANIEL&ELIZABETH MATHIS,MICHAEL&OLIVIA 15087 SW 161ST AVE 16144 SW KESSLER LN TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 MATfHIASFAMILYTRUSfBYMATTHIAS,FREDA&MARILYNMIRS MAULDING, MARK E&HEATHER A 14853 SW ROY ROGERS RD 14978 SW 164TH AVE SHERWOOD OR 97140 TIGARD OR 97224 MAXEY, EMILY&WENDELL JR MAYHEW,WAYNE E&JOAN W 16395 SE DEKALB ST 15098 SW CABERNET DR TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 MAllUCA,SCOTT&JACKI PO BOX 2263 TUALATIN OR 97062 MCCLESKEY, MICHAEL T&ALITA A MCCRACKEN,STEVEN C&DEBORAH A TRUSTEES 15590 SW APRIL LN 16412 SW LUKE LN TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 M CKAY, K E N D RA MC7VlAHON,MARIANNE P REVOC LMNG BY MCNU>FiON,MARIANNE P TR 13965 SW FLORENTINE AVE 13855 SW ROY ROGERS RD TIGARD OR 97223 SHERWOOD OR 97140 MCNEIL, DANIEL DALE&GINI ROBER MCROBERT,JENNIFER L BROWN, MELVIN JR 16830 SW BULL MOUNTAIN RD BROWN,CAROLYN H TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 MCVICKER, BRIAN GERARD AND YOLANDA MARIE MEADS,VIRGIL E&KAREN A 14941 SW ROSARIO LANE 14960 SW 161ST AVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 MECKEL, ERIC MEURISSE, ROBERT T M DERENE 16386 SW GEARIN CT 14145 SW 164TH TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 MEYER,GREGORY W&DOROTHY A MILLER,CRAIG&JULIE ELIZABETH 13096 SW ROSHAK RD 16444 SW SPINDLER CT TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 MILLER REVOCABLE TRUST MILLER, MARCELLE 15336 SW BURGUNDY ST 16386 SW DEKALB ST TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 MILLER, ROBERT C JR& KRISTA L MINER,DONALD WM TRUST 16306 SW STAHL DR PO BOX 129 TIGARD OR 97223 SHERWOOD OR 97140 MINER, DONALD WM TRUSTEE MINOR, LARA M PO BOX 129 16360 SW HOOPS CT SHERWOOD OR 97140 TIGARD OR 97223 MIRSKY,SIDNEY&HELEN TRUSTEES MOGHIMIAN, HAMID&ZAHRA 16476 SW LUKE LANE 13842 SW FERNRIDGE TER TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 MONTPLAISIR, BRAD&WENDY COLLIN MOONEY,THOMAS A&JENNIFER R 14990 SW HAWK RIDGE RD 16430 SW LORENZO LN TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 MOORE,CONRAD L AND JANET MOORE,1 DAVID&CAROLYN M 14505 SW HAWK RIDGE RD 15706 SW 149TH PL TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 MORALES-DENISON, MICHELE DENISON,GARY R MORAN, DAVID K 14920 SW WOODHUE ST 14900 SW 150TH AVE TIGARD OR 97224 T�GARD OR 97224 MORNEAULT FAMILY TRUST MORTENSEN,GARY RICHARD& MORTENSEN, RACHEL G 14945 SW BROOKLET PL 15067 SW CABERNET DR TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 MURDOCK, DANA E & DOUGLAS R MUSTAFA,ALI 13885 SW VENEZIA TER 13920 SW FLORENTINE AVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 NARVER, MIKE NEEDELMAN,SHAWN L&ALISON N 21035 NE SUNNYCREST RD 16144 SW COOPER LN NEWBERG OR 97132 TIGARD OR 97224 NEELANDS,TODD A&TRACY N NEFF,GREG S& BECKY 16355 SW O'NEILL CT 15025 SW 149TH PI TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 NEIDERS, REGINE I &GUNARS K NELSON, KEITH D 14517 SE 178TH PL 16350 SW PALERMO LN RENTON WA 98058 PORTLAND OR 97223 NEWELL, MARY ANN TRUST JEFFRY M TRUST NEWMAN,1996JEROME&CAROLANEREVOG46LETRUST 16658 SW JORDAN WAY 14628 SW 164TH AVE TIGARD OR 97224 PORTLAND OR 97224 NGUYEN,JOSEPH PHI NGUYEN,PHUNG V&DO, HUYEN C 16375 SW TUSCANY ST 16395 SW TUSCANY ST TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 NGUYEN,THERESA T LE, PHAT NIELSEN,NATALIE 14874 SW SOPHIA LN 16179 SW KESSLER LN TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 NIMZ,CLIFFORD A& DANA L NOFFZ,JOHN 0 JR&CHERYL A 14899 SW SOPHIA LN 15170 SW FINIS LN TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 NUCIFORO, PRISCILLA A TRUST PO BOX 55 SHERWOOD OR 97140 OBERHELMAN, MATTHEW V BROKAW, EMILY L O'CLAIRE, PATRICK F&KATHLEEN M 2595 NW PORTER RD 16264 SW KEERINS CT FOREST GROVE OR 97116 TIGARD OR 97223 O'CONNELL,TIMOTHY F&SIANNE D ODEGARD,LEONARD G 14683 SW 164TH AVE 14859 SW 162ND TER TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 OLSEN,DAWN E OTT,THOMAS A AND KATHLEENA 16112 SW HAZELTINE LN 16485 SW 0'NEILL CT TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 OU, BERT BUNRITH PARFET,GENE V&TERESA K 16430 TUSCANY ST 16186 SW HAZELTINE LN TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 PARK, BETTY KIM, KWANG JOO PARRISH,BRYON L& PATRICIA 16780 SW BULL MOUNTAIN RD 16370 SW RHUS CT TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 PARSONS,JOHN D&PATRICE J 16261 SW SNAPDRAGON LN TIGARD OR 97223 PARTIDA, MARIA PASTORI,ALLEN&DEBORAH 13980 SW 164TH AVE 14445 SW 164TH ST TIGARD OR 97233 TIGARD OR 97224 PATEL, MRIDULA PATEL,MUKESH P&ALPA M 14968 SW BURGUNDY CT 15797 SW HUNTWOOD PL TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 PATRICE TRUST PAYNE, DAVID A&BARBARA D 15217 SW CABERNET DR 14951 SW 164TH AVE TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 PEARL, LORI J PELLUMBI,ENGELL 15344 SW CABERNET DR 14615 SW 164TH AVE TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 PEPPERWOOD DEVELOPMENT LLC PERALA,JEFFREY E&CONNIE A 2835 82ND AVE SE STE 300 14950 SW JULIET TER MERCER ISLAND WA 98040 TIGARD OR 97224 PERRIN,JEFFREY T&VANESSA N PETERS,JULIA&EDWARD 14837 SW 164TH AVE 15020 SW 149TH PL TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 PETERSON, CINDI R_DONALD A RENUNCIATION TRU PETERSON,JEFFREY S&LESLIE J 156015W APRIL LN 15800 SW DEKALB ST TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 PHILLIPS, LINDA T PILERI, LAWRENCE MICHAEL JOSEPH AMANDA BROOKE 13980 SW VENEZIA TER 13695 SW 163RD PL TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 PISCITELLI FAMILY TRUST 15540 SW APRIL LN TIGARD OR 97224 POMPEI,WAYNE J&CATHERINE J 15940 SW DOZIER WY TIGARD OR 97224 PONDS, FRANKLIN R& KIMBERLY P PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPAN 16143 SW HAZELTINE LN 121 SW SALMON ST TIGARD OR 97224 PORTLAND OR 97204 POTRUCH, ROBERT A&TAMARA L POULSON,JEFFREY W&LINDA 5 13805 SW FLORENTINE AVE 16419 SW 0'NEILL CT TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 PRIAUIX, DOUG T&TRACY M PRICE, MAURINE G LIVING TRUST 13885 SW 163RD TER 14375 SW 164TH TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 PRICE,STEVEN W& PRICE, LINDA M RALSTON,CHRISTOPHER J R05HAK, DON E 14929 SW ROSARIO LN SHERWOOD OR 97140 TIGARD OR 97224 RALSTON,CHRISTOPHER J&SHERI L RANDOLPH,JIMMY RANDOLPH, PATRICK R 21029 SW LEBEAU RD 14337 SW ROY ROGERS RD SHERWOOD OR 97140 SHERWOOD OR 97140 RANSOM,JOHN 5 RASMUSSEN,ROGER& NANCY 16429 SW LEEDING LN 15165 SW FINIS LN TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 RAUBOLT,STEVEN W&JUDY M RAVEN,JOSEPH 16389 SW CROMWELL CT 16465 SW WOOD PL TIGARD OR 97223 UNINCORPORATED OR 97223 RED ROCKET LLC ROSHAK, DON E&THERESA M REDELL,JULIE L 13580 SW ROY ROGERS RD 16392 SW BRAY LN SHERWOOD OR 97140 TIGARD OR 97224 REED,SUSAN D&SEAN W REGIMBALD,LYLE LASKE,NICOLE 13725 SW FLORENTINE AVE 14975 SW 162ND TER TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 REICHENBACH,TIMOTHY J&LANI A REIERSON,STACY ANN 13825 SW FLORENTINE AVE 14813 SW 162ND TER TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97224 RENDINE, DANIEL J/VICTORIA S RENGEL,IRIS 16236 SW KEERINS CT 14872 SW HUNTWOOD CT TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97224 RESER, MARK A& LAURIE A REVERMAN,WILLIAM C& BEVERLY G 17576 SW BULL MOUNTAIN RD 15385 SW CABERNET DR TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 RICCARDI,SANDRA L RICE, MICHAEL D&VALERI R 14966 SW WOODHUE ST 14915 SW 154TH TER TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 RIGGS, RYAN A&JOANNA S ROBERG,PETER 1& DANA R 16391 SW LUKE LN 16355 5W GEARIN CT TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 ROSE,JARRETT P& MARIA A ROSE, LARRY W&JOYCE A TRS 15755 SW BEEF BEND RD 16444 SW LUKE LN TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 ROSENTHAL,JOSHUA&KATHERINE FAMILY TRUST ROSHAK FAMILY II LLC 14925 SW 161ST AVE 14205 SW HIGH TOR TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 PRICE,STEVEN W& LINDA M_ROSHAK, DON E ROSHAK,DON E 13921 SW ROY ROGERS RD SHERWOOD OR 97140 13580 SW ROY ROGERS RD SHERWOOD OR 97140 ROSHAK, KEVIN A ROSHAK, MARK&CLAIRE 16515 SW BULL MOUNTAIN RD 7515 SW 189TH AVE TIGARD OR 97224 ALOHA OR 97007 ROSHAK, MICHAEL A ROSHAK,RONALD ET AL 17570 SW SKYLINE WOODS LN 13794 SW ROY ROGERS RD BEAVERTON OR 97007 SHERWOOD OR 97140 ROSHAK,VICTOR ROXAS, MARION 2409 SW NYE AVE 7777 BONHOMME AVE,STE 1100 PENDLETON OR 97801 ST LOUIS MO 63105 RUO, HIRO YUEH-HUNG RUPP, RICHARD E&CHRISTIE LEE 16276 SW DAHLIA CT 16331 SW HOOPS CT TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 RUSKAY, PETER J&JULIA A RUST, BRIAN A&STEPHANI L 14816 SW HUNTWOOD CT 14947 SW HUNTWOOD CT TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 RYERSON, RANDY& MARCELLA SANDERS LIVING TRUST 13925 SW FLORENTINE AVE 14105 SW 164TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 SASS,AARON & MELISSA SCHAFFER,THOMAS L&ADELE T 14871 SW 164TH AVE 14907 SW ROSARIO LN TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 SCHERER,STEPHEN T SCHOONOVER,TRAVIS&LETICIA R 16479 SW SPINDLER CT 16470 SW 0'NEIL CT TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 SCHULZ, CHARLES SCHUMACHER, KATHRYN 14191 SW ROY ROGERS RD 14576 SW 164TH AVE SHERWOOD OR 97140 TIGARD OR 97224 SEARFUS,SUSAN E SENDA,MIA 16337 SW LEEDING LN 16375 SW LORENZO LN TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 SENDA,SEVERO& REYNA SHEEAN,SEAN M&KAREN S 16119 SW HAZELTINE LN 13745 SW 163RD PL TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 SHEPARD, MARK A DEBENAVIDES, MARIA T SHEPLEY,SCOTT W GALES,AIMEE K 14854 SW HUNTWOOD CT 16188 SW KESSLER LN TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 SHI,ZHE&CHAI,JINWEN SHIELDS,WILLIAM E 1635 VILLAGE PARK LN 26909 SW LABROUSSE RD LAKE OSWEGO OR 97034 SHERWOOD OR 97140 SHIM,STEVE H K& MI JIN SHINLY ENTERPRISES 16415 SW LORENZO LN 3205 EDGEMONT RD TIGARD OR 97223 LAKE OSWEGO OR 97035 SHULTS,RANDAL D&BRENDA S 16269 SW DAHLIA CT TIGARD OR 97223 SILVA, BRADLEY& DEBRA SIMONE,DANIEL K&ELYSA K 13119 SW ROSHAK RD 16374 SW BRAY LN TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 SIMS, BRETT M & KAREN J SINCLAIR,TAMARA I 16370 SW STAHL DR 15599 SW BURGUNDY ST TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 SLATER,STEPHEN J SLOAN, KLINT&KRISTI 15240 SW CABERNET 5T 13890 SW FLORENTINE AVE PORTLAND OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 SMILOVE,STEPHEN R SNYDER, ROBERT L&VIRGINIA A 16380 SW LUKE LN 16455 SW LUKE LN TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 SOLIVAN,THOVANE SOLIVAN, PATTY SORG,KURT 0&EILEEN M 14938 SW 164TH AVE 16327 SW LUKE LN PORTLAND OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 SPECTRUM DEVELOPMENT LLC SPEED, PAUL&KRISTEN PO BOX 3440 16418 SW CROMWELL CT WILSONVILLE OR 97070 TIGARD OR 97223 SPRUNK, BARBARA KIMBERLY SRINIVASAN,CHANDRAMOULI V NATARAJAN, RAMYA 14960 SW BROOKLET PL 13945 SW FLORENTINE AVE TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 STALZER, LARA C TRUST AGREEMENT STANLEY,JEAN A TRUST 14781 SW JULIET TER 15025 SW 161ST AVE TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 STANLEY, LAUREN K STANLEY,IULIE ANN STEDMAN,JACQUELINE D 14920 SW 163RD AVE 1213 TAYLOR LN TIGARD OR 97224 LEWISVILLE TX 75077 STEELE, GREGORY A STEIMER,RICHARD T&DEBORAH L 6107 SW MURRAY BLVD PMB 115 16381 SW LEEDING LN BEAVERTON OR 97008 TIGARD OR 97223 STEVENS,TIMOTHY J& BRANDI LEE STILES IIVING TRUST 16348 SW LUKE LN 16300 SW RHUS CT TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 STIPPICH,DAVID L/INGER 14970 SW HAWK RIDGE RD TIGARD OR 97224 STONE,CRAIG&AMY STORM,TOM 14900 SW SOPHIA LN 16437 SW CROMWELL CT TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 STRONGIN,GEOFFREY S&MARSHA R STUHDREHER, PETER M&LAURIE A 14950 SW WOODHUE ST 16326 SW HOOPS CT TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 SUEN, KAI PING&SUE TAT SUN RIDGE BUILDERS INC 15849 SW DOZIER WAY 14930 SW BROOKLET PL TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 SUNDERMEIER,WILLIAM A1R&RHON 15300 SW FINIS LN TIGARD OR 97224 SUTTON,SCOT M 15629 SW 149TH PL TIGARD OR 97224 SUTTON,TROY G SWANSON,SALLY J 16454 SW WOOD PL 15064 SW CABERNET DR PORTLAND OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 SWEE,JAMIE A&SHERRY A TABOR,STEVEN A&CARRIE B 16120 SW KESSLER LN 16387 SW 0'NEIL CT PORTLAND OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 TACCOGNA,JUDITH E LIVING TRUST TANNER FAMILY LLC ATTN: PAM BENSON 14973 SW 164TH AVE 13500 SW PACIFIC HWY#499 TIGARD OR 97224 TI6ARD OR 97223 TATTAR, MARC J& KAARI D THEDE,TINA L&SCOTLAND J 16317 SE CROMWELL CT 15700 SW DEKALB ST PORTLAND OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 THOMAS,JOHN & LYNETTE JNT REV T THOMPSON,KANDY KAY 15022 SW CABERNET DR 16350 SW COLONY PL TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 THOMPSON, KENNETH E&PAULA K THURMAN,CAROLE D 15194 SW CABERNET DR 15926 SW DOZIER WAY TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD WATER DISTRICT TIGARD-TUALATIN SCHOOL DISTRICT PO BOX 23000 6960 SW SANDBURG 5T TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 TILLIA, NORMA JUNE TORNBLAD,A E& RITA L 14335 SW 164TH AVE 15376 SW CABERNET DR TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 TOWNLEY,JAMES&SARAH TOYA, HORI&BERTRAM 16308 SW CROMWELL CT 14835 SW 163RD AVE TI6ARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 TRAN, MAN M NGUYEN,CECILIA K TRAN, PHONG HONG HUYNH, PHUONG NGUYET 16116 SW DEKALB ST 16375 SW MILAN ST TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 TRAWINSKI, DOUGLAS A&TERESA N TREVIZO,RENE P&SARAH E 14843 SW ROSARIO LN 12792 SW DAVINCI LN TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 TRI-COUNTY INVESTMENTS LLC TUSCANY HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC 17933 NW EVERGREEN PKWY STE 300 16520 SW UPPER BOONES FY#t200 BEAVERTON OR 97006 PORTLAND OR 97224 TUSCANY HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC TUSCANY HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC 16520 5W UPPER BOONES FY#200 16520 SW UPPER BOONES FY#200 PORTLAND OR 97224 PORTLAND OR 97224 UPCHURCH,GERALD S URBANSKI,TRAVIS 14992 SW ROY ROGERS RD 14065 SW 164TH AVE SHERWOOD OR 97140 PORTLAND OR 97224 VALLEY VIEW SUBDIVISION HOA BY GERI MERCURIO PO BOX 23099 TIGARD OR 97281 VARGA,STEVEN G&TONYA A 13190 SW ROSHAK TIGARD OR 97224 VENTURE PROPERTIES INC VERDINE,MICHAEL W& MARCI A 4230 SW GALEWOOD ST#100 16433 SW HOOPS CT LAKE OSWEGO OR 97035 TIGARD OR 97223 VEST, BRADLEY W& DELAINA D VESTERGAARD, LARS N VESTERGAARD, KIRSTEN L 16383 SW DEKALB ST 16387 SW DEKALB ST TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 VIRAPHANTH,TAVATSAY&SISAAT, PANY& VONADA, LARRY E&KATHLEEN 1575 CLAMPETT WAY 16352 SW CROMWELL CT SAN JOSE CA 95131 TIGARD OR 97223 VOREL,MARK&WENDY WAHL,JEFFREY J&GENEVIEVE C 16364 SW LEEDING LN 16301 SW STAHL DR TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 WALKER,CHRISTOPHER J&KARI L WALKER, DAVID J&JOY A 14627 SW 163RD AVE 14860 SW ROSARIO LN TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 WALKER, LAWRENCE J&MARILYNN E WALKER, RANDALL D&SHERRENE G 1645 SW 171ST TER 14973 SW ROSARIO LN BEAVERTON OR 97006 TIGARD OR 97224 WALLACE, DONALD W& KATHRYN Z WALLACE-THOME, NORA B BUSH, MICHAEL GARY 14025 SW 164TH AVE 15149 SW CABERNET DRIVE TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 WALTER,SHERRI K& RANDY L WANG, MIAO TE&YUEH CHIN 40000 NW 64TH CT 16118 SW KE55LER LN WOODLAND WA 98674 TIGARD OR 97224 WARD, HAROLD K REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST WASHINGTON COUNTY SUPPORT SVCS 5535 CULVER DR SE 169 N FIRST AVE SALEM OR 97301 HILLSBORO OR 97124 WEATHERS,IOHN & DINA D WESTPHAL,COLLEEN A ENGELSTAD, MARK E 16399 SW HOOPS CT 15398 SW CABERNET DR TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97224 WHISLER, DEBORAH L&THOMAS D WHITE, RONDA J 15025 SW CABERNET DR 16394 SW HOOPS CT TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 WIDMER,STEVEN M & ROXANNE R ANDRADE WINTHERS,WILLIAM C&LORRAINE M 16415 SW MILAN ST 14800 SW HAWK RIDGE RD TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 WISS, PHIL&KELLY WON6,STEVEN&MARY 16495 SW TUSCANY ST 16284 SW DEWBERRY LN TIGARD OR 97223 TI6ARD OR 97223 WONG,STEVEN &MARY X WOOD,TIM R&JODY L 16317 SW STAHL DR 14966 SW JULIET TER PORTLAND OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97224 WOOTEN, RICHARD G&KATHLEEN A WORKMAN,STEPHEN G&MARY 14861 SW ROSARIO LN 16370 SW PALERMO LN TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 WU, HSIAO JUNG&SHEN TAI YUN WU,WAN-I JENNY WYLAND,JOHN R&JAMIE L 16342 SW GEARIN CT 13910 FLORENTINE AVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 YAHNA, CHRISTOPHER J &STACEY D YARBROUGH,OIARLFSJTRlJST&YARBROUGH,64R6ARAATRUST 15370 SW BURGUNDY ST 15300 SW CABERNET DR TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARO OR 97224 YEUNG,STEVE YI, EUN CHONG&CHONG HUN 13785 SW 163RD PL 8160 SW 147TH TER TIGARD OR 97223 BEAVERTON OR 97007 YOUNG, FRANKLIN R&LINDAJ ZAHLER, KENNETH M& BARBARAJ 14533 SW 163RD AVE 16487 SW LUKE LN TIGARD OR 97224 TI6ARD OR 97223 ZALEWSKI, DERYL BIRNEY—ZALEWSKI,JANET ZELK,JOSEPH ROY&NINA LE TRINH JOINT LIVING TRUST 14866 SW TREVOR LN 14877 SW 163RD AVE TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 ZELLER,CLARK G&GAIL L ZENTI,TRACIE L&PETER T 16294 SW DAHLIA CT 10695 NW JORDAN LN TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97229 ZHANG,ZHIHUI YANG,XIAOYE ZOBRIST, ROBERTJ&SHAUNA L 14650 SW TREVOR LN 14965 SW BROOKLET PL TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 �� ;:. � �: � � ., �. b �, v = LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 120 DAYS =N/A FILE NO.: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA) 2012-00002. FILE TITLE: ADOPT WEST BULL MT. CONCEPT PLAN LAND USES AND ASSOCIATED POLICIES APPLICANT: Ciry of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: To amend the current Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map to include map designarions for the River Terrace Community Plan area based on recommended land uses found in Washington County's West Bull Mt. Concept Plan; to amend the current Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goal 14: Urbanizarion goals, policies,and recommended acrion measures. LOCATION: River Terrace Community Plan Area ZONE: N/A APPLICABLE Community Development Code Chapters 18.380 and 18.390; Comprehensive Plan Goals 1, 2, 5, 6, REVIEW 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ,12, 13, and 14; Metro Functional Plan Tide 11; and Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 5, CRITERIA: 6,7, 8,9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14. COMMENTS SENT: November 8,2012 DUE: November 23,2012 DATE DLCD NOTICE WAS SENT: October 29, 2012 __ DECISION MAKING BODY BELOW: ❑ TYPE I ❑TYPE II ❑ TYPE III � TYPE IV � PLANNING COMMISSION (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: December 3, 2012 TIME: 7:00 PM � CITY COUNCIL (I`UES.)DATE OF HEARING: December 11,2012 TI1�1E: 7:30 PM COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION � PROPOSED ORDINANCE/AMENDM�NTS � S'TAFF REPORT � DLCD NOTICE � VICINITY MAP � SITE PLAN STAFF CONTACT: llarren Wyss, Senior Ylanner (503) 718-2442 � 0 M 1 �DLCD Notice of Proposed Amendment or ❑Periodic Review work Task Proposed Hearing or ❑Urban Growth Boundary or Urban Reserve Area THIS COMPLETED FORM, including the text of the amendment and any supplemental information,must be submitted to DLCD's Salem oftice at least 35 DAYS PRIOR TO THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING ORS 197.b10,OAR 660-018-0020 and OAR 660-025-0080 Jurisdiction: City of Tigard Date of First Evidentiary Hearing: 12/03/2012 Local File Number: CPA2012-00002 Date of Final Hearing: 12/11/2012 Is this a REVISION to a previously submitted proposal? � No ❑ Yes Original submittal date: � Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment(s) � Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment(s) ❑ Land Use Regulation Amendment(s) ❑ Zoning Map Amendment(s) ❑ Transportation System Plan Amendment(s) ❑ Urban Growth Boundary Amendment(s) ❑ Periodic Review Work Task Number ❑ Urban Reserve Area Amendment(s) ❑ Other(please describe): Briefly Summarize Proposal in plain language IN THIS SPACE(maximum 500 characters): The City of Tigard proposes to adopt city comprehensive plan map designations for the River Terrace Community Plan area(see attached maps).The plan designations are based on recommended land uses found in Washington County's West Bull Mt. Concept Plan and adopted by Resolution and Order 10-105.Adoption of plan designations will set expectations for the community planning process and also allow the city to access funding to complete the initial phases of the project.The city also proposes to adopt policy language into the Goa114 section of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. The policies will address the application of city zoning and regulations through completing the community planning °ocess and the timing of switching from county to city jurisdiction upon annexation.Affected areas are within the UGB. Has sufficient information been included to advise DLCD of the effect of proposal? � Yes,text is included Are Map changes included:minimum 8'/z"xl l"color maps of Current and Proposed designations. �Yes, Maps included Plan map change from:County FD-20 To: see attached maps Zone map change from:N/A To: N/A Location of property(Site address and TRS): See attached maps and table Previous density range: County FD-20 New density range: 5 to 40 units/acre Acres involved:500 Applicable statewide planning goals: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 l2 l3 l4 l5 l6 17 18 19 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Is an exception to a statewide planning goal proposed?❑ YES �NO Goal(s): Affected state or federal agencies, local governments or special districts(It is jurisdiction's responsibility to notify these agencies. Metro,Washington County,Clean Water Services E Local Contact person(name and title): Darren Wyss,Senior Planner Phone: 503-718-2442 Extension: ' �dress: 13125 SW Hall Blvd. City:Tigard Zip: 97223 .x Number: 503-718-2748 E-mail Address: Darren@tigard-or.gov - FOR DLCD internal use onlv- DLCD File No � SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS This form must be submitted to DLCD at least 35 davs prior to the Grst evidentiarv hearing. per ORS 197.610, OAR Cha�ter 660, Division 18 and OAR Cha�ter 660, Division 25 1. This Form 1 must be submitted by a local jurisdiction. lndividuals and organizations may not submit a comprehensive plan amendment for review or acknowledgment. 2. When submitting a plan amendment proposal,please print a completed copy of Form 1 on light green paPer if araitabtc. 3. Text: Submittal of a proposed amendment to the text of a comprehensive plan or land use regulation must include the text of the amendment and any other information necessary to advise DLCD of the effect of the proposal. "Text" means the specific language proposed to be amended, added to or deleted from the currently acknowledged plan or land use regulation. A general description of the proposa) is not adequate. Please submit Form 1 with ALL supporting documentation. 4. Maps: Submittal of a proposed map amendment must also include a map of the affected area showing existing and proposed plan and zone designations. The map must be legible, in color if applicable and printed on paper no smaller than 8'/z x 11 inches. Please provide the specific location of property: include the site address (es)and Township/Range/Section/tax lot number. Include text regarding background,justification for the change,and the application if there was one accepted by the local government. 5. Exceptions: Submitta( of proposed amendments that involve a goal exception must include the proposed language of the exception. 6. Unless exempt by ORS 197.6I0(2),proposed amendments must be submitted to DLCD's Salem office at least 35 days before the first evidentiary hearing on the proposal. The 35 days begins the day of the postmark, or, if submitted by means other than US Postal Service, on the day DLCD receives the proposal in the Salem Office. The first evidentiary hearing is typically the first public hearing held by the jurisdiction's planning commission on the proposal. 7. Submit one paper copy of the proposed amendment including the text of the amendment and any supplemental information and maps (for maps see#4 above). 8. Please mail the proposed amendment packet to: ATTENTION: PLAN AMENDMENT SPECIALIST DEPARTMENT OF LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT 635 CAPITOL STREET NE, SUITE 150 SALEM,OREGON 97301-2540 9. Need More Copies? Please print forms on 8'/Z xl l green paper if available. If you have any questions or would like assistance, please contact your DLCD regional representative or contact the DLCD Salem Office at(503) 373-0050�38 or e-mail plan.amendments(a�state.or.us. http://www.ore�on.�ov/LCD/forms.shtml Updated February 14,2012 „ City of Tigard : CPA2012-00002 , e Proposed Tigard Comprehensive Plan Text Changes The City of"I'igard proposes to amend the Goal 14: Urbanization chapter of its comprehensive plan to include the four policies below. The policies will be located under e�sting Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goal 14.3. The policies are intended to provide guidance regarding the proposed map amendment of adopting the recommended land uses from the West Bull Mt. Concept Plan. 5. The City shall complete the R.iver Terrace Community Plan by using, and refining as necessary, the West Bull Mountain Concept Plan recommendations as the foundation. 6. Thc City shall apply zoning districts and regularions as part of the River Terrace Community Plan, which will comply with the Statewide Planning Goals and the Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan, and become applicable upon annexation to the city. 7. The Ciry shall complete an infrastructure financing plan as part of the River Terrace Community Plan. 8. The City shall defer land use and zoning decisions to Washington County, as outlined in the Intergovernmental Agreement dated Apri124, 2012,until the R.iver Terrace Community Plan is complete. � I/��II/.�.P.OID'��Ii��'1.��11� �►''/' • � • � • � . 1 • . • ' :� • � ,��;��:�, • . I ' 1 1 I 1 1 � ��' ��q'u''�iiu� nuuii�� - �. -;,,;,;% ►�%�i:��. �I_�ly�. .,...� ..'„ �;�:....•;..,:.,.: . . a.��. ��•..-- �� B�`;,,..,.�� ,.:==e_:�.. :.;.;�.... � � ��amuu � -�lii��-==' : '�...�� 1�� r� In111I � �� ap� = � ��r� - �, �1 ■��111111 ' ��/1111 .��/�� i� � 1��1�=:�"rIP/p 111111 1111111�:��111 !$ � =/„�� 1 ��►ra�nu�� mm�� . ;��. • ��iu ��iuu H_ ... o �_!-��---- lr�.11l�� • ��. ��:�npll� I.IIU i - ... -� � - . . . �� ' 1�� I/= 11111111 1�IIIIIII � �,w• ►��►��'�,��iii� . . � . . - ►I� , �iii�i!��' �:==� �� ► �� i*iil ll 1111►��j��lll • �- I�� 1�� ► �� /IIIIII . .. ■�� ►��11111111 �� 111111 -. �- :p •�� :111111 �� :.■■ ..:�� =i�uimnn . .- ;= um�� ,�mmmu� umnurn.—,. :�n�� ::=unun mu�=�n� � ��I� �•�11111/11 111111 Q '� �� - • �• ••• • - �� :�� :5=-��. - -=►�-=� .� .■m� . .== �11�— :n�► .r��I�" �O=.� ••- .. - ►I� :—�ii'i��1►'`�� ..�'`-��II�� ,�� ' � � _ — �IIIIII�IIIIIII��I'�� r.�nrj- ' � � ��,�1��un�l��, ,� � . - rI I �.`;=:�`��I►/ � �I I .. . :. .. ►i � �'I�� ,��•�� ._ . :. .. �►� I I ��►,��►�r�fl �• I ��iii ii�ii:i�� , _ . :. .. ;; ' ; ;: ._ =...,,..,.,..,,�,,,, .., .._ � _� � . � �uunum��,�1� i I � . ■um�nnn■i '�i � � � � � �, � ; ,,:;,,;-;;;;;;;�;�� u� unmum� ��► � ij � � �Ium� uu■n■�n:� 11� � ■�■ i •��III�� I p�i i �I/Ij � ••u„ uJ;■.■■■■i:,�:L� �■ �n� Ill��mn►I G:�I � � � :=�� ■u�� I r�� 1�� ;��_�.��/��j��■�_ �� 1/�� n �...... ■ r��il1�� i.■ il � � , _�; ��:1 �� . � � nurr� �� . '� .�. � 1��`�■'%A� 1 , ' � � �1I ��I / - �� _ �: ° � , ��1;!�". . �� `•��• "_= �� ='-'- ��/� 1�� nuu� . I�� a ►��,II�� '��y �a� J�• 1��►�Q��1��:%ii � •'iu��r•� ..�i��a�� .: �muu��i�::��►� -� 1111111!�� •��ti ■ 11111�'��' •��O ■ � .�. • �u�� _�r: s� `��, _�::Sr �==_�.. :lu�n.�...�■� �111111� ,��r. �_A..�,,,• �, luumnnlr�� - �. I .� � ■'� �� I/��II/_��`��':d�iiil�b��ll� 1�/►'/� : .� � • . / ' 1 ' � . • � 1IGAIiD • � � ' � ' ' 1 " _� _ II��'.... ----" �� - ♦ . '%j _ =�i�m��mru iiiii��' •��`��►.�'l�:�� _ """'" ru mr�'!� ., ,�� . • ■�.. �� , - uu��;',` ,. � ''�-_ _ _ .��,�.�.,_■■■. i' ► � � ��::��: :►��:�--r- -► �uu�ui �� 1fi'��:�E��_== � ►�i� �ii�.■ ■.. . �� ,��:- u_ -�-=- _ :-==r�1 - ., �� r��IIIIIIO n111111111 1111111��:-�V�..�/�� ,�.�i�� I,�'�R�,�►I 11111111 /111111111 11 111 � �=Ill !!!. �� / � �1� I I��IIIllllj�11 �IIIIIIIII . �___ :s�`��II - • -• - r 1• 1� .� �II ��1�11111 � 11 11H1_ x .. I��I t►��1111�111 � ,, /IIIIIII �� ►I/�1111 � �- � . • � �"�III11O -11111111 , ��\=_I li� -mun - h i�i��►� ��==��q . . . �I ��►�iil 11 iiilj��:�ilil�� i� � �� . ��/111111 ; .. ■� ��►��11111111_G ��i�llll :� ■ ��,��1,1��u�u11111: � � :C �� %IIIII%11111111111 p� �u �numnnn nuunumy� � . � - iii '.:��n�u�� U�n�lp� �i ■�1111/11/ UIIII p � � � ��C =:-_��._: ==r'"� � ._ . :. ._ . 1 -��r/� `O�. �� r i i�`i��/� 1��=� �_ • :• •. : .�=��1� �� 1111111�1111111 i� 1/�� r.�nr� � _ . :. .. � ��u�1�� 1 r� i �;::�'��I� � � � � � I �� i,j►��jC - :� � �•�,��`►ilil`�� :��-�■ : -_ , i ��iii iili�i��/� �� = �== � � .►. : 11 , . _,.,,,.,,,,,�. . . . , .�, ,:=..1�r�-, ■ _I . �unuuun��i�I/l,r�♦, ,� -�►�►� i�� . �:ummun�/► 'llli � 1 ��i�� . � :�u��uun�`� ��!►� � j�j% � m uuumm�■�- ��i�:: �� uu�uiunmu�:'.��,',� � _ � :11:��ii� � � uu uu��u� = � 11\� !�/ /��l�� - ur��- :�-�i9:��iiLi��\�Llr:j: ��/��;,� Illiuiin►I��1�� ..... �� l��i�//��%�� _�j��i�i� , �--�■��=�� I Irr �� • uuun.'%A� � i .Il,��i � � ��1��.��,. , _ ._ . �..� === = == ��......�...,..::: .� , ��;,,�. ..,,,,,, '■ � !i1 � '":'� 1��►`C�■�►�:�i� :��r`...��■��►`� ��111111\�G� �i��• ■ � ��►1 I 1 11111�1� i/••�� . 1 1 1��'� s.��n , �.�■ .�� `�r: ■� u 1:"-iii�� !U'�u i:n�� 6.� � � .. � � I � �� _... �--- . . �.>�.�, ��. �tc r Y ;-� �'7. _.A� .' _. ; L\.�n.{ ... . . .... . „ .,�� -,, . .. .! '� ' _. ' . .��>:._� � i� . _._ �.:c '" —'— _.:_ ... � `Y l� ` .i_ u�i .___. ° �� 'a , ?' J .. . �� '_ , / y_y .: .� i � . ,' Z011lllg �IStt1CtS - � ".�{,��" `��.'-. ` � '�� r? ''' -� �� i '. " , ' ; S � � I � �� - � � i:. ,�. d i �--�; and - - 1��: � 4"�.,.. � ��.,� � r �; ��rv ,- �- �!--�. f.� � ` � '� ��?' � �� t4 ,, � �- �;�.' � �, , ; Comprehensive Plan Designations � �,:r�� ;, €�1;, - 'a,-� �",,�c M , '�= �v 'c�i ,..f`��r -�` �-"� ` _ Ciri�of Tigard Ore�on _ ,�cz�,� � - r.<5��a�'� ,�'c_---,� � � " ""` ��1'- � � E� t�e� ' � � _.. _ ._'_ - .�r`�` �� , �,� � ,, � .� �111��-�� `�� : .,, � �',< i Ei.r �I��' � � �� _ t- .. .. � r��,�.�� j�,-� ��.� �, /�_ ..: , ...E�YI\��.� {� �p <� . � �. �� > r � _ ,� r -� � ,,r �� ,, .._._ _... . --- T -�-�.--.� . __. � - c, r'� *-'t r�Ei.Y= -- ,. . .�y. 3�'L.I ..C � i � •. ` M ' . � ... ��,h� ' � �`Tr ' y"'^^ _ M� � .iy ;� '�.�f�mo[e�erove Plan Deranatrorw ZOMM CIMi1RGi�pM �� - � ��'L �:� :.. �f " I I � __ ,.;,4 .�.�� w...u..c.�hr e�.,a..0 c:o a.M�r � ...- Ci'r� .. � _ �4 � � - � , :�� ... c°"""'RC°m°ar cw r+Yw�n�eca...dr ' .. � � , I s � , . � o�: • ..'.� ts.�.�rc�.�w c+ na...ie�rco....w Y� ��'. . ^� � � S� . .. ' I ,_ � �now ce�+ w+ �w..r�w.w . ""a � � v.a..e�r cw�.,.�a.� w ti�arw�v.n � Ya .. ,. �� -� e.r � d � � ��'� IM�WMtiriV M�CW M.su..GeMWY��rOY`H • . �(( '•.. .. � �� MUC M�1 UY CammwcY � 'l�'' �m �S -" .. -_ y ^ IMwYYI ... lnwC.nMb.r.Mw+ wuc.t �wawcm.e..Wt •R:.- � MUF ��UwlnNeY��M MMWmdnMYl1�W MUf.1 lMlniM�nM1 /� ' � � �as �.t� ��+M�r R.w.r rA.es r.a w e�sM•.�.x n . YIR.1 MN U..R..1l�YI1 ''�1r�� .. 1—,� b�� .,'I� ..._�-_ / - "" �OwNll'R��WMY MU143 A M lM R�M0.tiY11 � � I�y__ . �n �j r-� �� L � ce�.�..�r �-� om an n r��a�:. � . . I . nw.wu..e„a,n,,,w �.x moaosanw�wee. �� , w ria �� re� e.s�w�� a.e o.oao sa n r�u es. . � _ �t �ab i.eoonanr��ase. '�i -tl � r.ww u..e.dw�x �.r e.000 sv n uw�d eo-. �. , •�� . . .- � IM�NIh�11��tlwWY� 11-IS ).0106anMMWfQ. � �� ..r '-�T�� _ MbNUUP�Ww�lYli �.x �.rosrnrw�wae. —,- ' � " A � �'�{:.i� II�O �O4N�H4n , -- pw�lYC� Im �Dw`Mew�w�dMY �� I .. . . . , Ai41cInNInllon 1�1 d�I�MWMY� ' �� .. � �r d� .. Q �^�/PMMM �.. �.v y � � Y . . . '. Q lhMn Growl�Eo�MrY ... . M � �� • � . . a.,:�� -` ✓ e� .<, � .., � .» \\ 4�' �fi'�t` � � u � °•-^ =� � ; �j �{;:r � .�:,.: . � �� K ��l�� P � • � te � �-t3. �� , '"�'t' " �] `�'� � �� m� � � � � �.a _ nci � . . "^".. � ,r �pe�� ` '�� .� ... . w �, . �f R nr�v'�e` . . �di yJ w .. MJ _iR �� V � �`/'G�_ . . Iy� i o��,' - v . . . .._. nM WS - Il.t� `\ a � � _ • us ' . . ,'� ._ ', � �i+ '� _ •Ili - ,, �r-1' _ +, ' _..�,� ..... ,c° e ' f �5 " . t �.� � M � � � �� 5 yT- �.�,r _ _ i�, �.r i" ; /� t ` �i. �m. _ i�� E � , � , '.��I,��' �~'%J � ..� ' . �'� ��`. � 11w3 . .l � µ �.. . _. ._ � f1 - � .. a i.: B �� d�r �� , .... � a �.L � , w . . I s.is na _ �as .... �. �� I � • ' . (� -✓+F �%,. - �.i 1 w� nm d . �,i� ,,.. � � ,i� �� k i � ��r +�--.. ( � . _--�,� � -• ...� � �:� L� .. � o ' i� I�;?�� +i �. ^} . „ ,��.�k� t 1 7�I ��` .�f# � � � ,,,� K ��, 't : .��' � ��r� `� ��,., � � �, .. 3 � .o • "^ ~� "�,�Y� �_ i ; / . '� ' �}�� {�! f �� y'��,� �� - � ,,,�� '� �'/�'y��!`�.�/�_ e . r ,. .: \ ;'�,�� li'.. / - .�:a �{� �7. � ` .a: I „ I � ' y .,y ^',;;.. eo ��j .m "� e�. w� �..> ., _ .., .� ', ; +'�_ ., r� ,,I' . �.• �6n- ' , `'"I . � , � _. {C ..,- _ .i � A T� - � .��_.. • _. ii 4 , � �..�, �A T•" 4 ,� �.� �� "�" I �� a. �.i� � �� .. 'y�/ ��.� . ��,�1�`n � � �.e� p� K r�. ;� "// � / I I - 'I . ,.,1:1� ' . ' . . � ~ - _ . � � . . \ _I . . _. I '1� ,-� � I�'�� i ��u`'1 �"` I' i � _ " _ �•�'. ~ ' <; � � � � i � � f YJ �� / L�. .. �� r— � � -� a,`�' i �� , a, _. � �- ' > � i � � � I � �_ . . � � � . � 1 .�= � � 'I '. . u�'q�`�` . i � � � - .. � � '-!. � , . .�,,. , , ' . �r�,: % — � � �-�.�a< . -� ,:�—�-�� ' �, .. t-'s� � � � �� _ �-- .� -� Y.� , �_ -�`t � --�, �� 1 ' �'; —i . ��i� �-r �_._.�-rt+��rr�- � . ;i.' �.1:An'_.... __'�_ ,c. �Y�'�<,.i .✓ ...... ..�_ City of Tigard-CPA2012-00002 Property List TLID SITEADDR A T ACRES 251060000100 16705 SW FRIENDLY LN 5.83 251060003800 16550 SW FRIENDLY LN 5.36 2S1060001800 11.30 251060001801 10.17 2S106d001700 13015 SW ROY ROGERS 1.15 2S1060001200 17026 SW FRIENDLY LN 3.32 251060001100 17000 SW FRIENDLY LN 1.13 251060001000 16808 SW FRIENDLY LN 15.65 2S1060003400 16720 SW FRIENDLY LN 5.02 25105C602200 0.01 251060001600 13127 SW ROY ROGERS 4.20 251060001101 17012 SW FRIENDLY LN 3.55 251060001400 4.07 251060003500 11.65 251060001401 13240 SW ROY ROGERS 1.31 251060001500 11.83 251060003301 13580 SW ROY ROGERS 11.85 251060003300 13794 SW ROY ROGERS 26.76 2S1060002900 13705 SW ROY ROGERS 8.72 251060003000 13819 SW ROY ROGERS 8.77 251060003200 13855 SW ROY ROGERS 0.93 251060003100 13921 SW ROY ROGERS 9.78 251070000103 4.88 251070000100 6.04 251070000104 4.12 251070000102 5.64 2S1070000105 5.64 251070000106 5.03 251070000101 16515 SW BULL MOUNTAIN 5.03 2S1070002000 16920 SW BULL MOUNTAIN 4.57 251070001900 16880 SW BULL MOUNTAIN 4.31 TLID SITEADDR A T ACRES 251070001300 16830 SW BULL MOUNTAIN 3.19 251070001305 16780 SW BULL MOUNTAIN 3.00 2S1070001302 16650 SW BULL MOUNTAIN 5.00 251070001303 4.85 251070001200 14992 SW ROY ROGERS 11.94 251070001400 15252 SW ROY ROGERS 38.96 2S1080002900 15025 SW 1615T AVE 19.00 2S108CA00400 15275 SW FINIS LN 9.85 2S108CA00300 15165 SW FINIS LN 10.00 251080001506 15225 SW 150TH 5.00 251080001505 15225 SW 150TH 4.87 251080002901 15087 SW 161ST AVE 1.00 251080003000 15149 SW 161ST AVE 10.00 251080001504 5.09 2S1080001500 15225 SW 150TH 9.74 2S108CA00100 15300 SW FINIS LN 10.00 2S108CA00200 15170 SW FIN�S LN 10.00 251080001501 5.07 251080003100 15455 SW FINIS LN 10.00 251080001503 15475 SW 150TH AVE 4.95 251080001507 15445 SW 150TH AVE 4.77 251080003200 15727 SW TAYLOR LN 20.00 2S108CD00300 9.94 2S108CD00100 15601 SW APRIL LN 10.00 2S1080001401 15515 SW 150TH AVE 9.93 2S1D80001400 15685 SW 150TH AVE 9.95 2S108CD00400 15540 SW APRIL LN 8.15 251080001402 15745 SW 150TH AVE 10.05 2S108CD00200 15590 SW APRIL LN 10.00 251080001404 15915 SW 150TH AVE 5.00 251080001403 0.29 251080001405 15955 SW 150TH AVE 2.30 251080001406 15975 5W 150TH AVE 2.30 . City of Tigard ■ . . � . Land Use Permit Applicat�on PRE-APP.HELD BY: ��K ...�� . :_ �_ _ _ _ _ . �... � File# �G/oL —G 0 0 C�% �Z Other Case# �- Date �� `'� i By �S``'� Receipt# `� Fee Date Complete � TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR ❑�ldjustment/Variance(I� �Historic Overlay(II or II� ❑Site Development Review(I� �Comprehensive Plan�lmendment(I� ❑Home Occupation(I� ❑Subdivision(II or IIn ❑Condirional Use(IIn ❑Minor Land Partition(In ❑Zone Change(IIn ❑Development Code rlmendment(I� ❑Planned Development(IIn ❑Zone Change rinnexation(I� ❑Downtown Design Review(II,IIn ❑Sensitive Lands Review(II or II� NOTE: FOR REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS,PLEASE REFER TO YOUR PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES LOCA ON WFIERE PROP(166F.D AGTIVI'fY WII.L OCCUR(Address if a bk) �,t�� %el�.�_�.� �rn��.-,u �li.. �'-/'�� TAX MAPS dc AX LOT'NOS. T AI,SI'I'E SIZE ZONIt�1G CI.ASSIFICAITON .s C:C� � c ,%C 5 nPr�cnrrr � ��/ Y � -� /lJ�� MAII.ING ADDRFSS CTIY STATE ZIP �3�,�s S�� ,�� ' �� < <.��:1; C'iZ r �.�.�3 PHONE NO. AX NO. >`G3 - `7 � � � � y4�'� so3 - •�1 � - � 7�15� PRIMARY CONTA PERSON PHONE NO. �� C�:' 7ss 5�= =j 7f� - �yyz ��. , ��,-/'�,� C�' � ; 'ti,�� — c� _ �ti PROPERTY OWNER/DF.ED HOLDER(Atnc1�Gat if more than one) MAILING ADDRESS CTIY STA ZIP PHONE NO. FAX NO. *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owners must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this a lication. PROPOSAL SUMMARY(Please be apea ) / -� / �l�t �c 1 � � -✓ i U C Sf 5 ' ' r.t�-� � �-E�- � 4� /1'L�- �;C z 3'e w�- .`�^�' _ i Vf_r' ��a"!ti c � �� ,J iv/`G'1. ivt �Rr'7� � -�..J !� t �"�w�.L c� /Y Gt��/tiv+—st':s(� �-.^�-� ci S/�' c � i�/S,r✓l C.� . �} w� l �c- � � s Gc'�,..,..i.- �„— rD�.ss ,,C� �,✓ ..._ i«is ` �S y ��' � ��1 � t L / �' �� '=Y-� n hti o t C l.P-S i�� S �- ` s �►.� �' �� (� . �" �'G1^'v1'�K�vl p f--`_. � City of TiQard � 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Ti¢ard,OR 97223 I 503-718-2421 I www.tiQard-or.vov I Pa�e 1 nf2 THE APPLICANT SHALL CERTIFY THAT: ♦ If the application is granted, the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. ♦ All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments,and exhibits transmitted herewith,are true;and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued,based on this application,map be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. ♦ The applicant has read the entire contents of the application,including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application(s). SIGNATURES OF EACH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED. Owner's Signature Date Ownet's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Sigaature Date Owner's Sigttature Date � ��_ S^ �� i��y��o�L Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date Citv of Tinard I 13125�W Hall Rlv�i Tioarr� C�R 97�� I 5n3_71 S��d�1 I ..,..,..,r�,..,«,�_,.«,.,,., i n,.,.,o �..<o CITY OF TIGARD „ PRE—APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES ° k�� i (Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Siz (6) �lonths) � ' �. �� d� '��: ' � - i5-l.�rL PRE-APP.MTG.DATE: STAFFATPRE-APP.: �S�`'� � G�' �F _ _ RESIDENTIAL APPLICANT: ( �� i� �<<<"�"-"� AGENT: /'`�'r,z�-�- l�.'yss� Phone: � � - Phone: � S�' �� 8 - �y`�-z PROPERTY LOCATION: � / � ,�^�i.� �,'T=��' �c�,-n�� l"1,-, �,� � .�1DDRESS/GENER�II.LOC�1T'ION: � � T\X AL-1P(S)/LOT#(S): NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: � �'� PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: f}�p C'��-�-,� �-� � >• j-= Y--� ' �'° «�, , •Y �..��ti...,,.,�.� .� �w �s .� c,,�<� � c� COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAI' DESIGNATION: �`�'1�s ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: ^%�� ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18. ) MINIMUI�1 LOT SIZE: sq. ft. Average 1�1in. lot width: ft. Max. building height: ft. Setbacks: Front: ft. Side: ft. Rear: ft. Corner: ft. from street. M/�XIMUM SITE COVERAGE: %. Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: %. GARAGES: ft. ❑ NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout) THE APPLICANT SHALL NO'I"IFY ALL PROPL?RTY O�'NERS WITHIN 500 FEET, IN1'FRESTLD PARTIES, AND TH . ITY OF TIG R PLANNING DIVISION of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posung and the meeting norice. Meerin�is to be held �rior to submitring�our a��licarion or the a�lication will not be acce�ted. * NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meering with a Plans Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application. ❑ NARRATIVE (Refer to Code Chapter 18.390) The APPLICr�N"I' SHALL SUBMIT i� N��RRATIVE �vhich provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address cnteria would be reason to consider an apphcation incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should revicw thc codc for applicablc criteria. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 9 ReSiden6al Applica6on/Planning Division Section ❑ IMPACT STUDY (Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.050) As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDF IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system,the parks system,the water system,the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facilit� system and type of impact, the study shall propose unprovements necessary to meet City standards, and to mii�nize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly propornonal to the projected impacts of the development. ❑ ACCESS (Refer to Chapters 18.705 and 18.765) 1�linunum number of accesses: . Minimum access width: Minimum pavement width: ❑ WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.705) Within all ATTACHED HOUSING (except two-family dwellings) and mulri-family developments, each residenual dwelling SI i�1LL BE CONNECTED BY WALKWAY TO THE VEHICULAR PARKING A_RFA, C01�1MON OPEN SPr�CE AND RECREATION FACILITIES. ❑ RESIDENTIAL DENSITY CALCULATION (Refer to Code Chapter 18.715)- SEE EXAMPLE BELOW. The NET RESIDENTIAL UNITS ALLOWED on a parricular site may be calculated by dividing the net area of the developable land by the minunutn number of square feet required per dwelling unit as specified by the applicable zoning designation. Net development area is calculated by subtracting the following land area(s) from the gross site area: All sensirive lands areas includine: • Land within the 100-year floodplain; • Slopes exceeding 25%; • Drainageways;and • ��'edands for the R-1,R-2,R-3.5,R-4.5 and R-7 zoning districts. Public right-of-way dedication: • Single-family allocate 20% of gross acres for public facilities;or • 1�lulti-family allocate 15% of gross acres for public facilities;or • If available, the actual public facility square footage can be used for deduction. E�r1MPLE OF RESIDENTIr1L DENSITY CAI.CULATIONS: (USING A ONE ACRE SITE IN THE R-12 ZONE (3,050 MINIMUM LOT SIZE)WITH NO DEDUCTION FOR SENSITIVE LANDS) Single-Family Multi-Family 43,5G0 sq. ft.of gross site area 43,560 sq. ft.of gross site area 8.712 sq.�20%1 for�ublic right-of-way 6.534 sq.ft,�15%) for�ublic right-of-way NET: 34,848 square feet NET: 37,026 square feet - ��mi im �m lot a al - ��Q�Q_�minim�m lo ar al = 11.4 Units Per Acre = 12.1 Units Per Acre Note: The Development Code requires that the net site area exist for the next whole dwelling unit. NO ROUNDING UP IS PERMITTED. Note: Minimum Project Density is 80%of the maximum allowed density. TO DETERMINE THIS STANDARD,MULTIPLY THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF UNITS BY.8. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 9 Residenlial ApplicatioNPlanning Division Seclion ❑ SPECIAL SETBACKS (Refer to Code Section 18.730) • STIZE�TS: feet from the centerline of • FL.AG LOT: A TEN (10)-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK applies to all primary structures. • ZERO LOT LINE LOTS: A minimum of a ten (10)-foot separation shall be maintained between each dwelling unit or garage. • MULTI-F1�MILY RESIDENTIIIL building separarion standards apply within mulriplc-family residenual developments. ACCESSORY STRLTCTCJRES UP TO 528 SQUARE FEET in size may be permitted on lots less than 2.5 acres in size. Five (5)-foot minunum setback from side and rear lot lines. ACCESSORY STRUCTURE UP TO 1,000 SQUARE FEET on parcels of at least 2.5 acres in size. (Note: See applicable zoning district for the primaty structures' setback requirements.) ❑ FLAG LOT BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.730) Mf1XIMUM HEIGHT OF 1'/z STORIES or 25 feet,whichever is less in most zones;2'/z stories,or 35 feet in R-7, R-12,R-25 or R-40 zones provided that the standards of Section 18.730.010.C.2 are sadsfied. ❑ BUFFERING AND SCREENING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.745) In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUr,L IMPACTS between adjacent developments,especially between different land uses,the CITY REQUIRES LANDSCAPED BUFFER AREAS along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may � be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Addidonal information on required buffer area matenals and sizes may be found in the Development Code. The ESTII��TED REOUIRED BUFFERS a�licable to your�ro�osal area is: Buffer Level along north boundary. Buffer Level along east boundary. Buffer Level along north boundary. Buffer Level along east boundary. IN ADDITION,SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: ❑ LANDSCAPING (Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.765 and 18.705) STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE S"IREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within si�c (6) feet of the right-of-way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecnng street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. ❑ RECYCLING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.755) Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND I�PPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. L,ocating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such as at the intersecrion of two (2) driveways within a parkin lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's Service area. Pride Disposal can be reached at (503� G25-6177. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 9 Residential Application/Planning Division Section ❑ PARHING (Refer to Code Chapters 18.7G5& 18.705) I�LL Pr1RKING AREAS AND DRIVE��(1AYS MUST BE PAVED. • Single-family............Requires: One (1) off-street parking space per dwelling unit;and One (1) space per urut less than 500 square feet. • Multiple-family.........Requires: 1.25 spaces per unit for 1 bedroom; 1.5 spaces per urut for 2 bedrooms;and 1.75 spaces per unit for 3 bedrooms. Mulri-family dwelling units with more than ten (10) required spaces shall provide parking for the use of guests and shall consist of 15% of the total required parking. NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BF.I�F,SIGNAT'ED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. Parking stalls shall bc dimcnsioned as follows: • Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet,6 inches x 18 feet,6 inches. • Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet,6 inches x 16 feet,6 inches. • Handicapped parking: All parking areas shall provide appropriately located and dimensioned disabled person parlcing spaces. The rrununum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided,as well as the parking stall dunensions, is mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. ❑ BICYCLE RACKS (Refer to Code Section 18.7G5) BICYCLE Rr1CKS are required FOR MULTI-F�3�IILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in converuent locations. ❑ SENSITIVE LANDS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.775) The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YFAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURr�.I_, DRAINAGEWAYS,WETLAND AREAS,ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to prelinunary idenrify sensitive lands areas at the pre-ap�lication conference based on available informarion. HOWEVER, the res�onsibility to �recisely identi�f sensmve land areas, and their boundaries, is the res�onsibilit� of the a��licant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on�lans submitted with the develo�ment a��lication. Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. ❑ STEEP SLOPES (Refer to Code 5ection 18.775.070.C) When STEEP SLOPES esist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field explorarion and invesrigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. ❑ CLEAN WATER SERVICES (CWS) BUFFER STANDARDS (Recer co CWS�t&O o7-20/USA Regu�aeo�s-Chapce�3) LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality funetioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table identifies the required widths: (See Table 3.1 on following page) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 9 Residential Applica6onlPlanning Division SecGon TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL/RESOLUTION&ORDER 07-20 SENSITIVE AREA DEFINITION SLOPE ADJACENT WIDTH OF VEGETATED TO SENSITIVE AREA� CORRIDOR PER SIDEZ ♦ Streams wnth inrexmittent flow draining: <25°/0 � 10 to <50 acres 15 feet I 25 feet >50 ro <100 acres ♦ E�cisting or created wetlands <0.5 acre 25 feet ♦ Existing or created wedands >0.5 acre <25% 50 feet ♦ Rivers,streams,and springs with y�ear-round flow • Streams with intermittent flow draining>100 acres ♦ Natural lakes and onds ♦ Streams with internvttent flow drauung: >25% � 10 to <SO acres 30 feet I 50 feet >50 to <100 acres ♦ Existing or created wetlands >25% �'ariable from 50-200 feet. 1�leasure in 25- ♦ Rivers,streams,and springs with year-round flow foot increments from the starting point to • Streams with internlittent flow drauung>100 acres the top of ravine (break in <25%slope), ♦ Natural lakes and ponds add 35 feet ast the to of ravine3 1Starting point for measurement=edge of the defined channel(bankful flow)for screams/rivers,delineated wedand boundary,delineated spring boundary,and/or a��crage high wa[er for lakes or ponds,whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intcmuttent springs,located a minimum of 15 feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated corridor,shall not serve as a starting point for measurement. ZVegetated corridor a�•erai;ing or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition. �'I'he vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ra�-ine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated comdor. The 35 fcet may be reduced ro I S feet,if a stamped geo[echrtical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback fcom the top of ravine. Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, construcrion acriviries, gardens, lawns, applicarion of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor,except ar provided for in the USA De.rign and Con.rtructiarr Standarc�r. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIr1L DEVELOPMENT WHICH CRFATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract,and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. CWS Service Provider I.etter: PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the CWS R&O 07-20 sensirive area requirements. If there are no sensitive areas, CWS must still issue a letter staring a CWS Service Provider Letter is not required. ❑ SIGNS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.780) SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the Ciry of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Addirional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is revie�ved as part of a development review application. Alternarively,a Sign Code Exception applicarion may be filed for Director's review. ❑ TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.0 and the "Tree Plan Requirements Handout" included in your pre-application conference packet) A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING,REn40VAL AND PROTECTION OF'1`REES prepared by a cerrified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, or conditional use is filed. PROTECTION IS PREFERRED OVER REMOVAL WHEREVER POSSIBLE (Address all items in the Ciry's Tree Plan Requirements Handout). CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 9 Residential Applica6onlPlanning Division Sec6on THE TREL I'LAN SHALL IN�:LUllE the following: • Identification of the location,size,species,and condition of all existing trees greater than 6-inch caliper. • Identificarion of a program to save e�sring trees or miti�ate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Miugation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D according to the follounng standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, strcets and parking lots: • Retainage of less than 25% of eacisring trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mirigarion program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; • Retainage of from 25 to 50% of e�sring trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.O60.D.; • Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; • Retainage of 75%or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; • Identificadon of all trees which are proposed to be removed;and • A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. 'I'REES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. ❑ MITIGATION (Refer to Code Section 18.790.060.E.) REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: • A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. • I f a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. • If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the follo�ving formula: • The number of replacement trees required shall be detennined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably a�ailable replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city,either public properry or, with the consent of the owner,private property. • The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturiry. IN LIEU OF 'I1ZEE REPLACEMENT under Subsecrion D of this secrion, a party may,with the consent of the Director,elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. ❑ CLEAR VISION AREA (Refer to Code Chapter 18.795) The Ciry requires that CLEAR VISION ARF.AS BE MAINTAINED BE'I�X/EEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classificarion and any existing obstrucrions v�ntlun the clear vision area. The applicant shall show the clear vision areas on the site plan, and identify any obstructions in these areas. ❑ FUTURE STREET PLAN AND EXTENSION OF STREETS (Refer to Code Section 18.810.030.F.) r, FUTURE STREET PLAN shall: • Be filed by the applicant in conjunction with an application for a subdivision or partition. The plan shall show the �attern of existing and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land division and shall include boundaries of the proposed land division and shall include other parcels within 200 feet surrounding and adjacent to the proposed land division. • Identify e�sting or proposed bus routes, pullouts or other transit facilities, bicycle routes and pedestrian facilities on or within 500 feet of the site. Where necessary to give access or permit a sarisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 9 Residential Applica6on/Planning Division Section � ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.810.0G0) MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 2'/z TIMES THE AVERi1GE �Y/IDTH, unless the parcel is less than 1'/z times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. ❑ BLOCKS (Refer to Code Section 18.810.090) The perimeter of BLOCKS FORMED BY S'I'REETS SHALL NOT EXCEED 1,800 FEET measured along the right-of-way center line except where street location is precluded by natural topography, wedands or other bodies of water or,pre-e�sting development. When block lengths greater than 330 feet are permitted,pedestrian/bikeways shall be provided through the block. CODE CHAPTERS ❑18.330(Conditional Use) ❑�5.6�O(Downtown District Development&Design Standards) ❑18.755(Mixed So�id wastelRecyding Storage) ❑18.340(Directors Interpretation) ❑�S.6ZO(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) ❑�H.76O(Nonconforming Situations) ❑18.350(Planned Developmenq ❑18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) ❑�H.765(OffStreet Parkingl�oading Requirements) ❑'I$.3F)O{5fte Development Review) ❑18.640(Durham Quarry Desgn Standards) ❑�S.7T5(Sensitive Lands Review) ❑18.370(variances�Ad�ustments) ❑�H.7O5(AccesslEgresslCirculation) �18,780(si�ns) �'I H.38O(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) ❑�S.7�O(Accessory Residential UniLs) 018,785(Temporary Use Permits) ❑18.385(Misce�laneous Permi�) ❑1 H.7�5(Density Computations) ❑18.790 Rree Removal) ❑�8.390(Deasion Making Procedures/lmpact Study) ❑�H.72O(Desgn Compa6bility Standards) ❑1 H.7J5(Visual Clearance Areas) ��H.4�O(Lot Line Adjustments) ❑�$.725(Environmental Perfortnance Standards) ❑�H.7J8(Wireless Communica6on Facilities) ❑�8.420(Land Partltions) ❑�8.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) ❑18.81 O(Street&Uti�ity�mprovement Standards) ❑18.430(Subdivisions) ❑18.740(H�storic o�er�ay) ❑�8.5�O(Residen6al Zoning DisUicts) ❑�$.742(Home Occupation Permits) ❑18.520(Commeraal Zoning Districts) ❑�H.745(l.andscaping 8 Saeening Standards) ❑18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) ❑'I H.�SO(ManufacluredlMobil Home Regula6ons) ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 9 Residential ApplicationlPlanning Division Sec6on PROCEDURE Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing beforc the Planning Commission. 1'ublic hearing before the Planning Coi7unission with the Comnussion makin� a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An addirional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS r�ll APPLICA"I'IONS MUST BE ACCEP'1'ED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Apvlications submitted � mail or dro�ed off at the counter without Planning Division acce�tance may be teturned. The Planning counter closes at 5:00 PM. Ma�s submittcd with an aQplication shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8'/2" x 11". One, 8'/2" x 11" map of a �ro�osed�roject shall also be submitted for attachment to the staff re�ort or administrative decision. Apvlications with unfolded maps shall not be acce�ted. The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is acce�ted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applicaaons involving difficult or protracted issues or requinng revie�v by other jurisdicrions may take additional tune to review. Wntten recommendarions from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard Hearings Officer. A basic flo�v chart which illustrates the rcview process is available from the Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOT'ES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospecrive applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective apphcant to discuss the opporturuues and constraints affecnng development of the site. SUBDIVISION PLAT NAME RESERVATION (Washington County Surveyor's Office: 503-84G-8723) PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A SUBDIVISION L.AND USE r1PPLICATION with the City of Tigard, applicants are rec�uired to complete and file a subdivision plat naming request with the Washington County Surveyor's Office in order to obtain approval/reservation for any subdivision name. Applications will not be accepted as complete until the City receives the faxed confirmation of approval from the County of the Subdivision Name Reservation. BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS W'ILL NOT BE ACCEP'I'ED FOR REVIE�Y� UNTIL r'1 LAND USE APPROVAI. HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and 1�linor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the Ci �'s olic is to a 1 those s stem develo ment credits to the first buildin ermit issued in the develo ment (UNLESS O HERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT HE TIME THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 9 Residential ApplicationlPlanning Division Section PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospecrive applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of Ciry staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application, AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Di�nsion). PREPARED BY: Tohn Floyd Associate Planner CITY OF TTGARD PLr1NNING DIVISION PHONE: 503-639-4171 FAX: 503-718-2748 DIRECT: 503-718-2429 EMAIL: 'ol hnfl@tigard-or.gov TITLE 18 (CITY OF TIG�RD'S CO:�i�tUNITY DEVELOP:��NT CODE) INTERNET ADDRESS: www.rigard-or.gov H:\patty\masters\Pre-.1pp Notes Residential.doc Updated: September 27,2011 (Engineering section:preapp.en� CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 9 of 9 Residential ApplicaUon/Planning Division Section NOVEMBER 19 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DECEMBER 3 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DECEMBER 11 CITY COUNCIL MEETING