The URL can be used to link to this page

MLP2002-00007 9 k NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION ' , � z � � MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2002-00007 ,CITY OF TIGARD� � 3 L'olRfllt171tiy�E'Ve�7tUL'ttt µ L METRO PARTITION .� - � S ,�f BetterCommum 120 DAYS =11/28/2002 SECTION I APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME METRO PARTITION CASE NO Minor Land Partition (MLP) MLP2002-00007 PROPOSAL The applicant is requesting a Minor Land Partition to partition one (1) existing 175,547 square foot lot into two (2) parcels One parcel is developed with an industrial building complex The other parcel will be an open space tract APPLICANT Metro Parks and Greenspaces OWNER Fanno Creek Acres, LLC 600 NE Grand Avenue P O Box 159 Portland, OR 97232-2736 Aurora, OR 97002 ZONING DESIGNATION I-P Industrial Park District The I-P zoning distnct provides appropnate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e g , restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e g , noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to msure that developments will be well mtegrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian- friendly LOCATION 14865 SW 74�' Avenue, WCTM 2S112AC Tax Lot, 01200 PROPOSED PARCEL 1 100,624 square feet PROPOSED TRACT A 74,923 square Feet APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA Community Development Code Chapters 18 390 (Decision-Making Procedures), 18 420 (Land Partitions), 18 530 (Industrial Zonmg Distncts), 18 705 (Access Egress and Circulation), 18 715 (Density Computations), 18 745 (Landscaping and Screening), 18 765 (Off-Street Parking and Loadmg Requirements), 18 775 (Sensitive Lands), 18 790 (Tree Removal), 18 795 (Visual Clearance Areas), and 18 810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards) SECTION II DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request sub�ect to certain cond�tions The findmgs and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VI � M � � y T � h NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2002-00007/METRO PARTITION PAGE 1 OF 15 a CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT u mi to t e ngineering epa men rian ager, , ex or review an approval 1 Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall ay an addressing fee in the amount of $30 00 (STAFF CONTACT Shirley Treat, Engmeermg� 2 Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of 74�' Avenue to increase the right-of-way to 25 feet from the centerline ad�acent to Tract A The descnption shall be tied to the existmg right-of-way centerlme The dedication document shall be on City forms Instructions are available from the Engineering Department 3 The a plicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on finro monuments with a tie to the Ci�jr's global posifioning system (GPS) geodetic control network These monuments shall be on the same Ime and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north These coordmates can be established by • GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey • By random traverse using conventional surveying methods 4 Final Plat Application Submission Requirements A Submit for City review four (4) paper copies of the final plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to practice m Oregon, and necessary data or narrative B Attach a check in the amount of the current final plat review fee (Contact Planning/Engineenng Permit Technicians, at (503) 639-4171, ext 2421) C The final pla� and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (OF�S 92 05), Washington County, and by the City of Tigard D The nght-of-way dedication for 74 Avenue shall be made on the final plat E NOTE Washington County will not begm their review of the final plat untd they receive notice from the Engineering Department indicatmg that the City has reviewed the final plat and submitted comments to the applicant's surveyor F After the City and County have reviewed the finaf plat, submit two mylar copies of the final plat for City Engineer signature (for partitions), or City Engineer and Community Development Director signatures (for subdivisions) Submit to the Planning Department(Morgan Tracy, 639-4171, ext 2428)for review and approval 5 Tract A shall be designated as open space on the plat The following note shall also be placed on the final plat "No developmen� shail be permitted on Tract A that is inconsistent with the intent of providing open space Public access and structures necessary for providing public access, provision of below grade utdities, and structures and grading for stormwater management may be permissible sub�ect to prior sensitive lands review and approval " 6 The applicant/owner shall certify their acknowledgement that the approval of this partition does not authorize the construction of an access dnve or any other site improvements on Tract A Such improvements wdl require sensitive lands review and wdl further need to meet the standards of Chapfer 18 705 7 The applicanUowner shall record either a blanket easement to the City allowmg a bikeway to be extended through Tract A, or shall coordmate with the City (Contact Duane Roberts, ext 2444)to establish a specific easement for the bikeway NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2002-00007/METRO PARTITION PAGE 2 OF 15 i � � w �THIS APPROVAL{IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN (18) �' m � MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION NO�TED UNDER ° ' t� `� - THE PROCESS�AN�D APPEAL SECTION OF THIS DECISION � A�,�`°' �� a� �` SECTION III BACKGROUND INFORMATION Pro ert Histo e su �ect parcel is located withm the City of Tigard The property is designated as Industrial Park and open space on the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map A record search indicates that a Site Development Review (SDR 98-00019) was approved in 1998 This SDR also involved a sensitive lands (water resources overlay) review A lot line ad�ustment (MIS2000-00012)was approved in 2000 No other land use approvals were found to be on file Site Information and Pro osal Descri tions e su �ect site is ocate on t e west si e of 74't' Avenue, south of Bonita Road The properties to the north and south have the same Industnal Park (I-P) zoning as the sub�ect site To the north is a vacant parcel that has an approved but unconstructed industrial 6uilding To the south is ar�under developed property used for outside storage Properties to the east, on the opposite side of 74 Avenue and the Burlingfon Northem Rad Line, are zoned for Light Industnal devefopment (I-L) To the west, on the opposite side of Fanno Creek, properties are zoned R-7 and R-12 for Medium Density Residential development A larg e apartment complex is located to the northwest of the sub�ect site, on the oppos�te side of Fanno Creek The previous SDR approval is for a 25,300 square foot office/warehouse budding and associated parking and landscaping m the northeast portion of the site (Fanno Creek Business Park) The requested partition will segregate the developed portion of the site from the constrained flood plain and water resource portion of the sife SECTION IV PUBLIC COMMENTS The City maded notice to property owners within 500 feet of the sub�ect site providmg them an opportunity to comment No comments were received SECTION V SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA A summary of the applicable criteria in this case in the Chapter order m which they are addressed m this decision are as follows A Land Partitions 18 420 (Land Partitions) B Z$53 g��str�cts g 0 Industrial Zonin Districts C Specific Development Standar s 18 705 Access, Egress & Circulation) 18 715 Density Computations) 18 725 Environmental Performance Standards) 18 765 Off-Street Parkmg and Loading Requirements) 18 775 Sens�tive Lands) 18 790 Tree Removal) 18 795 isual Clearance) 18 390 Impact Study Section 18 390 040) D Street and Ut�lity Improvement Standards 18 810 (Street and Utdity Improvement Standards) NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2002-00007/METRO PARTITION PAGE 3 OF 15 The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters 18 720 (Design Compatibility), 18 730 (Exceptions to Development Sfandards), 18 742 (Home Occupations), 18 745 (Landscaping and Screenmg 18 750 Manufactured/Mobde Home Regufations), 18 755 (Mixed Solid Waste & Recyclable Storage�, 18 760 �Nonconformmg Situations), 18 780 (Signs), 18 785 (Temporary Uses), and 18 798 (Wireless Communication Facdities) These chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards SECTION VI APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Land Partitions (18 420) The applicant's preliminary partition plat indicates two parcels (Parcel #1 and Parcel #2) bemg created The applicant has also indicated thaf the constramed parcel wdl be set aside as open space As such, it shall be noted for the purposes of this partition review that the developable portion of the site will be referred to as Parcel #1, and the open space portion of the site wdl be referred to as Tract A The proposed partit�on complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations, The proposed partition complies or can be made to comply with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations as demonstrated b the analysis contamed within this administrative decision and through the imposition of conditions o�development approval All necessary conditions must be satisfied as part of the development and budding process Therefore, this criterion is met There are adequate public facilit�es available to serve the proposal, Public facdities are discussed in detad later in this decision under Cha pter 18 810 (Street 8� Utdity Improvement Standards) Based on the analysis provided herein, Staff finds that adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposal It should be noted that since the parcel bemg created wdl be for open space purposes, public facdities such as sewer and water, wdl not be required Therefore, this critenon is met All proposed improvements meet City and applicable agency standards, and The public facilities and proposed improvements are discussed and conditioned later in this decision under Chapter 18 810 (Street & Utility Improvement Standards) Improvements wdl be reviewed as part of the permit process and during construction, at which time the appropriate review authonty will ensure that City and applicable agency standards are met Based on the analysis in this decision, Staff finds that this cnterion is met All proposed lots conform to the specific requirements below The minimum width of the budd�ng envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning distr�ct The minimum lot width required for the I-P zornng district is 50 feet Parcel #1 is approximately 255 feet in width, Tract A is approximately 200 feet wide Therefore, this standard has been met The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district In the case of a flag lot, the accessway may not be included in the lot area There is no minimum lot area requirement in the I-P zonin� district The proposed part�tion creates two (2) lots that are 100,624 and 74,923 square feet m size Th�s criterion has been satisfied Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet or have a legally recorded minimum 15-foot wide access easement The proposed partition wdl result in one developable parcel and one open space tract While it is not necessary to brmg vehicular access to the open space tract, state law requires that each new lot be provided with a means of access, including the open space tract The open space tract wdl abut the public right of way for 201 feet The applicant has also applied for a mmor land partition of the property NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2002-00007/MEfRO PARTITION PAGE 4 OF 15 ► to the south to create an open space tract The applicant may wish to note that an access easement is required for that tract, and that such an easement could be recorded across this open space tract to achieve that result As both proposed parcels in this application have frontage, this standard is met Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district Setbacks for the I-P zoning district are as follows front, 35 feet, side, 0 feet, and rear, 50 feet (when abutting a residential zone, 0 feet when not) The proposed partition wdl not alter compliance with the front yard, side yard, or rear yard setbacks 7he newly created open space parcel will separate the new devefopment parcel from the residential zone, and therefore a 0-foot setback wdl apply to the rear of this prolect as well It should be noted that the open space tract is 50 feet wide where fhe property abuts the residential zone This critenon is met When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard, prov�ded that no side yard is less than 10 feet Structures shall generally be located so as to maximize separation from existing structures Neither proposed parcels are flag lots This standard is not relevant A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18 745 040 Screening may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed development As the proposed Tract A is an open space tract, there wdl be no accessway constructed, and thus no screen required The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway would have a detrimental effect on fire-fighting capabilities The fire distnct (NFR� has reviewed the �roposal and had no obJections or concerns related to this proposal Refer to the 'Agency Comments' section on page 14 Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one lot a reciprocal easement which will ensure access and maintenance nghts shall be recorded wit� the approved partition map No common driveway is proposed, and no driveway wdl be developed for the open space tract Any access way shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18 705, Access, Egress and Circulation This standard is addressed under Chapter 18 705 (Access, Egress and Circulation) later in this decision Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or ad�acent to the one-hundred year floodplain, the city shall re4uire consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adJo�rnng and within the floodplain This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycie pathway with the floodplain �n accordance with the adopted pedestnan/b�cycle pathway plan Land partitions are considered "development" by the Tigard Development Code The proposed parcels are ad�acent to and within the 100-year floodplain The applicant has indicated that the proposed open space tract is to close the gaps m the Fanno Creek Greenway Regional Trad Corridor The inclusion of this open space to a public entity for pathway purposes satisfies the mtent of this standard An application for a variance to the standards prescribed in th�s chapter shall be made in accordance with Chapter 18 370, Variances and Ad�ustments The applications for the partition and variance(s)/ad�ustment(s)will be processed concurrently No vanances or ad�ustments have been submitted with this application Therefore, this standard does not apply NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2002-00007/METRO PARTITION PAGE 5 OF 15 Industrial Zoninq Districts (18 530) Development standards in industrial zoning districts are contained in Table 18 30 2 below TABLE 18 530 2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN INDUSTRIAL ZONES STANDARD i-P Parcel 1 Tract A Mirnmum Lot Size None 74 923 s ft 100 624 s ft Average Minimum Lot Width 50 ft 255 ft 200 ft Mirnmum Setbacks Front yard 35 ft 50 ft N/A -Side facing street on comer&through lots 20 ft N/A N/A -Side yard 0/50 ft[1] 60 ft N/A -Rear yard 0/50 ft[1] 80 ft N/A -Distance between property line and front of garage — — — -Side Yard Setbacks for Flag Lots DC 18 420 050(A 4 e ' 10 ft N/A N/A Mawmum Hei ht 45 ft 28 ft N/A Maximum Lot Coverage 75% Can be met 0% Minimum Landsca e Re uirement 25% Can be met 100% [1]No setbadc shall be required except 50 feet shall be reqwred where the zone abuts a residenUal zornng disfict •Not a part of this table but has been Induded for reference There is no minimum lot size in the I-P zone The proposed lot sizes of 74,923 and 100,624 square feet meet this standard Parcel #1 is developed witF� an industrial warehouse building The proposed partition has taken into consideration the approved development to ensure that both setbacks and lot coverage requirements will be maintained by the development after the lot is modified Tract A is vacant and is proposed for open space No buildings are proposed on this tract, and thus setback and height requirements are not relevant Future development will be reviewed through the building permit process to ensure compliance with the I-P development standards Setback standards, required by Table 18 510 2 will apply to all future development of the proposed lots It shall be noted that Tract A is designated for open space and will not permit development inconsistent with the mtent of the open space Any subsequent lot line ad�ustments to increase the size of the developable portion of the property may require sensitive lands review (Chapter 18 775) FINDING Based on the analysis above and the imposition of the following condition, the Industrial Zonmg Distnct Standards for Parcel#1 and Tract A have been met CONDITION Tract A shall be designated as open space on the plat No development shall be permitted which is inconsistent with the intent of provid�ng open space Public access and structures necessary for providmg public access, provision of below grade utdities, and structures and gradmg for stormwater management may be permissible sub�ect to prior sensitive lands review approval Access, Eqress and Circulation (18 705) Continuin� obli�ation of property owner The provisions and maintenance of access and e ress stipulated �n th�s title are continuing requirements for the use of any structure or parcel o� real property in the City Owners of each parcel will be under the obligation to provide and mamtain access to their own property This provision has been met Access Plan requirements No building or other perm�t shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled The applicant shall subm�t a site pian The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement The access to the developed portion of the property has already been constructed As no development is proposed on Tract A, physical construction of the access wdl not be required NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2002-00007/METRO PARTITION PAGE 6 OF 15 Joint Access Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize �ointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land sat�sfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the �oint use, and copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City No�oint access is proposed in this partition, therefore, no access easement will be required Public street access All vehicular access and egress as required in Sect�ons 18 705 030H and 18 705 0301 shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the requ�red standards on a continuous basis All proposed parcels wdl have access to SW 74"' Avenue, a public street Both proposed parcels wdl directly abut the street Min�mum access requirements for residential use Private residential access drives shall be provided and maintained in accordance with the provisions of the Uniform Fire Code The proposed parcels wdl have industrial and open space uses This standard is not appiicable Access drives in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the turning around of fire apparatus by one of the following a) A circular, paved surface having a minimum turn radius measured from center point to outside edge of 35 feet, b) A hammerhead- configured, paved surface with each leg of the hammerhead having a minimum depth of 40 feet and a min�mum width of 20 feet, c) The max�mum cross slope of a required turnaround is 5% The access to the industrial development on Parcel #1 satisfies these requirements The access drive on Tract A will not be constructed, and therefore no turn around is required if in the future, an emergency access is proposed, these standards will need to be met FINDING Based on the analysis above, Staff finds the Access, Egress and Circulation Standards have not been met Demonstration of compliance will 6e assured through the building permit review CONDITION The approval of this partition does not authonze the construction of an access drive or any other site improvements on Tract A Such improvements wdl require sensitive lands review and will further need to meet the standards of Chapter 18 705 Densitv Computations (18 715) A Definition of net development area Net development area, in acres, shall be determined by subtract�ng the following land area(s) from the gross acres, which is all of the land �ncluded in the legal description of the property to be developed 1 All sensitive land areas 2 All land dedicated to the public for park purposes, 3 All land dedicated for publ�c rights�f-way 4 All land proposed for private streets, and 5 A lot of at least the size required by the applicable base zoning distr�ct, if an existing dwelling is to remain on the site B Calculatmg maximum number of residential units To calculate the maximum number of residential units per net acre, divide the number of square feet in the net acres by the min�mum number of square feet requ�red for each lot m the applicabie zoning distnct C Calculating minimum number of residential units As requ�red by Sect�on 18 510 040, the minimum number of residential units per net acre shall be calculated b multiplying the maximum number of units determined in Subsection B above by 80% (0 8� The standards for Density computation address the intensity of residential land uses and is not applicable to this proposal as it is industrially zoned land NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2002-00007/METRO PARTITION PAGE 7 OF 15 FINDING The Density Computation Standards have been met Landscapinq and Screeninq (18 745) Street trees Section 18 745 040 ec ion 45 040 A All development pro�ects fronting on a public street, private street or a private driveway more than 100 feet in length a proved after the adoption of this title shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with�he standards �n Section 18 745 040C This proposed pro�ect has frontage on SW 74"' Avenue Parcel #1 has installed street trees as part of the required street improvements Whde street trees are required on Tract A, installation of such trees shall occur when budding permits are issued Buddmg permits for Tract A wdl require a separate sensitive lands review There are existmg trees along the site frontage that may be adequate to serve as street trees, but this determmation wdl require seeking an ad�ustment to this standard In the meantime, the installation of required street trees will be deferred untd actual site improvements are proposed FINDING The requirement for planting street trees along the access dnve is not met In order to meet this requirement the applicant shall satisfy the following condition CONDITION Street trees will be required along the frontage of SW 74�' Avenue at the time physical construction of site improvements occur (sub�ect to sensitive lands review) Planting of these street trees shall be m accordance with the size and spacmg standards under TDC Section 18 745 040 C Tree Removal (18 790) ree p an�or�fanting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot„ parcel or combination of lots or parceis for which a development appl'cation for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed Protection is preferred over removal wherever possible The applicant has not submitted a tree plan as no trees are proposed for removal, and no physical construction is proposed that would require tree protection measures All the trees on Tract A will be retained Any subsequent tree removal for site improvements on Tract A will require tree removal permits as they are located in a sensitive land area Trees on Parcel #1 wdl not require removal as the improvements on this parcel have already been constructed FINDING Based on the analysis above, Staff finds that the Tree Removal Standards are met Visual Clearance Areas (18 795) TFiis(, ap er requ�res a a c ear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property ad�acent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle hedge; plantin , fence, walt structure or temporary or permanent obstruction exceed�ng three �3) feet in heigh� The code provides t'hat obstructions that may be located in this area s-hail be visually clear between three (3) and ei ht (8) feet in height Trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight�8) feet are removed A visuaf clearance area is the triang,ular area formed b measuring from t e corner, 30-feet along the right of way and along the dr�veway and connec�ing these �inro points with a straight line Visual clearance was reviewed as part of the prior site development review approval for the developable portion of the site Tract A wdl not have a driveway constructed and therefore is not required to have a visual clearance area FINDING Based on the analysis above, Staff finds that the Vision Clearance Standards are met Impact Study(18 390) ec ion states, "The D�rector shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application " Section 18 390 040 states that the ap�licant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facil�ties and services For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose �mprovements necessary to meet C�ty standard, and to NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2002-00007/METRO PARTITION PAGE 8 OF 15 minimize the �mpact of the development on the public at large, public fac�i�ties systems, and affected private property users In s�tuations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either s pecifically concur with a requirement for �ublic right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supporEs that the real prope� dedication is not roughly proportional to the pro�ected impacts of the development Section 1 390 040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an �nterest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public The applicant has submitted an impact study The applicant wdl not be required to physically improve the street due to the limited nature of the impacts of this partition The street frontage has been improved alon the frontage of Parcel #1 as part of developmg the industnal buddmg Since the partition request wdl no� result in further development, beyond what has previously been approved, there wdl be no traffic, noise, schools, parks, water, sewer, or street related impacts Potential impacts related to the development of Parcel#1 were exammed and conditioned as necessary to mitigate for any adverse affects Therefore, this standard is satisfied There is no Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) required for creation of this open space tract TIFs associated with development on Parcel #1 were conditioned in a previous decision and will be assessed at time of building permit application PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS ' Street And Utilitv Improvements Standards (Section 18 810) a� Q er $$� p�roviaes cons ruc ion s an ar s o�implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage The applicable standards are addressed below Streets Improvements Section 18 810 030 A 1 states that streets within a development and streets ad�acent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards Section 18 810 030 A 2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an ex�sting street shall be dedicated and �mproved in accordance w�th the TDC Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths Section 18 810 030(E) requires a local residential street to have a 42 to 50-foot right-of-way width and a 24 to 32-foot Qaved sect�on Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees This site lies ad�acent to SW 74�' Avenue, which is classified as a local commercial industrial street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map At present, there is approximately 30 feet of ROW west of the centerlme ad�acent to what wdl become Parcel 1, and 20 feet of ROW on the west side of the centerline ad�acent to what wdl become Tract A, accordmg to the most recent tax assesso�'s map The applicant should dedicate additional ROW to provide 25 feet from the centerline ad�acent to Tract A The applicant has proposed to dedicate this nght of way to comply with these requirements SW 74�' Avenue is paved but not fully improved to City standards Parcel 1 is already developed, and street improvements have been constructed ad�acent {o that site Tract A wdl become an open space area under Metro ownership and wdl not be developed, thereby resulting in no additional impact to the public transportation system For this reason, additional transportation improvements beyond the right of way dedication are not required NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2002-00007/METRO PARTITION PAGE 9 OF 15 Future Street Plan and Extension of Streets Section 18 810 030(F) states that a future street plan shall be filed which shows the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the boundar�es of the proposed land drvision This section also states that where it is necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future division of ad�oining land, streets shall be extended to fhe boundary lines of the tract to be developed and a barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street These street stubs to ad�oining propert�es are not considered to be cul-de-sacs since they are intended to continue as through streets at such t�me as the ad�oining property is developed A barr�cade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the property owners which shall not be removed until authorized by the City Engineer, the cost of which shall be included in the street construction cost Temporary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de- sac bulbs shall be constructed for stub streets in excess of 150 feet in length This proposed development lies between SW 74"' Avenue and Fanno Creek Street connection to ad�acent lots is impractical due to the need for a bridge crossing As there is an existing crossing at SW Bonita Road approximately 500 feet to the north, there is no particular need for an mternal street system Cul-de-sacs 18 810 030 K states that a cul-de-sac shall be no more than 200 feet long, shall not provide access to greater than 20 dwelling units, and shall only be used when environmental or topo�raphical constra�nts, existin� development pattern, or strict adherence to other standards �n this code preclude street extension and through circulat�on . All cul-de-sacs shall terminate with a turnaround Use of turnaround configurations other than circular, shall be approved by the City Engineer, and . The length of the cul-de-sac shall be measured along the centerline of the roadway from the near side of the intersecting street to the farthest point of the cul-de-sac . If a cul-de-sac is more than 300 feet long, a lighted d�rect pathway to an ad�acent street may be required to be provided and dedicated to the City The applicant's plan does not include a proposed cul-de-sac, therefore this standard is not applicable Street Alignment and Connect�ons Section 18 810 030(G) requires all local streets which abut a development site shall be extended within the site to provide through circulation when not precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, ex�sting development patterns or strict adherence to other standards in this code A street connection or extension is precluded when it is not poss�ble to redesign, or reconfigure the street pattern to provide required extensions in the case of environmental or topographical constraints, the mere presence of a constraint is not sufficient to show that a street connection is not possible The applicant must show why the constraint precludes some reasonable street connection There are no existing public streets that stub into this s�te Environmental constraints preclude further street extensions on or across this site Access to Arterials and Ma�or Coliectors Section 18 810 030 P states that where a development abuts or is traversed by an exist�ng or proposed arterial or ma�or collector street, the development design shall provide adequate protection for residential properties and shali separate residential access and through traffic, or if separat�on is not feasible, the design shall minim�ze the traffic conflicts The design shall include any of the following . A parallel access street along the arterial or ma�or collector, . Lots of suitable depth abutting the arterial or ma�or collector to provide adequate buffering with frontage along another street, . Screen plant�ng at the rear or side property line to be contained in a nonaccess reservat�on along the artenal or ma�or collector; or • Other treatment suitable to meet the ob�ect�ves of this subsection, . If a lot has access to two streets w�th different ciass�fications, primary access should be from the lower classification street SW 74�' Avenue is classified as a local industnal street The proposed development is neither abutting nor traversed by existing or proposed artenal or collector streets Therefore, this standard is not applicable NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2002-00007/METRO PARTITION PAGE 10 OF 15 Private Streets Section 18 810 030 S states that design standards for private streets shall be established by the City Engineer The City shall require legal assurances for the continued maintenance of prrvate streets, such as a recorded maintenance agreement Private streets serving more than six dwelling units are permitted only within planned developments, mobile home parks, and multi-family residential developments No pnvate streets are proposed with this development Therefore this standard is not applicable Block Designs - Section 18 810 040 A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be desi�ned with due re ard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs�or convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitat�ons and opportunities of topography Block Sizes Section 18 810 040 B 1 states that the penmeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of-way line except . Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or, pre-ex�sting development or, . For blocks ad�acent to artenal streets, limited access highways, ma�or collectors or railroads • For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access The proposed parcels are located along an existmg local street, which is in conformance with the block design standards Regardless, this proposal is not creating any additional streets and therefore this standard is not applicable Section 18 810 040 B 2 also states that b�cycle and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is not possible Spacing between connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where �recluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards in the code The proposed Tract A will eventually be part of a regional bike and pedestrian pathway system which will provide connections to other areas along the Fanno Creek trad Lots - Size and Shape Section 18 810 060(A) prohibits lot dePth from bein� more than 2 5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1 5 times the mmimum lot size of the applicable zoning district Tract A is 450 feet deep and 200 feet wide measured at the setback and is therefore 2 25 times the lot width Parcel #1 is 255 feet wide and 405 feet deep, or 1 59 times the lot width Therefore, this standard is met Lot Frontage Sect�on 18 810 060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or Private streets, other than an alley In the case of a land part�tion, 18 420 050 A.4 c applies, which requ�res a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement In cases where the lot is for an attached single-fam�ly dwelling urnt, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet Parcel #1 has 255 feet of frontage Tract A has 201 feet of fronta�e Each of the proposed lots meets the 15-foot mirnmum frontage requirement, therefore this standard is met Sidewalks Section 18 810 070 A requ�res that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arter�al, collector and local res�dential streets Street improvements, includmg constructing sidewalks, were constructed as part of the develoQment on Parcel #1 as required by the previous Site Development Review approval Since Tract A will remam open space, there is no increase to street traffic or site access associated with this partition proposal As the site wdl not generate any additional traffic, or access demand, sidewalks wdl not be required The applicant shall note that any future improvement to the site may tngger the need for improvmg the street frontage, as determmed through a subsequent development review This cntenon is satisfied NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2002-00007/METRO PARTITION PAGE 11 OF 15 San�tary Sewers Sewers Required Section 18 810 090 A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains �n accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan Over-sizin� Section 18 810 090 C states that proposed sewer systems shall �nclude consideration of additional development within the area as proJected by the Comprehensive Plan There is an existing CWS trunk sewer to the west of the site ad�acent to Fanno Creek Since TracC A will not be developed, no sewer lateral is needed for that site Therefore, no additional public sewer work is necessary Storm Drainage General Provis�ons Section 18 810 100 A states requires developers to make adequate provis�ons for storm water and flood water runoff Accommodation of Upstream Drainage Section 18 810 100 C states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development The C�ty Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Des�gn and Construction Standards for Sanitary and SurFace Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments) Ball Creek flows through Tract A toward Fanno Creek The purpose of creatmg Tract A is so that Metro can preserve the open space area ad�acent to Ball Creek and Fanno Creek This partition wdl not negatively impact the finro creeks Effect on Downstream Drainage Section 18 810 100 D states that where �t is anticipated by the CitX Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing draina�e facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provis�ons have been made for improvement of the potential condition or unt�l provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Des�gn and Construct�on Standards for Sanitary and SurFace Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future rev�sions or amendments) Since Tract A will not be developed, there wdl be no adverse impact to the downstream creek system Therefore, no additional storm dramage measures are needed B�keways and Pedestrian Pathways Bikeway Extension Section 18 810 110 A states that developments ad�oirnng proposed bikeways identified on the C�ty's adopted pedestr�an/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way The Ci�r's pedestrian/bikeway plan does not identify any necessary improvements for this segment of SW 74 Avenue A bikeway is planned as part of the Fanno Creek Regional trad Tract A will be part of this bikeway segment The applicant has indtcated in the impact study that Metro and/or the City of Tigard may in tfie future construct a pathway/bikeway through Tract A To ensure that subsequent changes m the property's title wdl preserve the abdity to construct such a path, a cond�tion should be imposed that requires a blanket pathway easement By imposmg this cond�tion, this standard will be met FINDING The application lacks provisions for pathway extensions CONDITION The applicant/owner shall record either a blanket easement allowing a bikeway to be extended through Tract A, or shall coordmate with the City to establish a specific easement for the bikeway NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2002-00007/MEfRO PARTITION PAGE 12 OF 15 Cost of Construction Section 18 810 110 B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements Not applicable Minimum Width Sect�on 18 810 110 C states that the min�mum width for bikeways with�n the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet Actual construction of the bikeway is premature at this time The final design for the pathway, including width and location is not yet avadable It would be untimely to construct this bikeway, absent any connection to the north or south The partition request is to preserve this area as open space and allow future construction of a pathwaX as other mtervening connecting properties develop or grant easements for the pathway This standard is met Utilities Section 18 810120 states that all utdity lines, but not limited to those required for electric communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placea underground, except for surFace mounted transformers, surFace mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be laced above round temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity elec�ric lines opera�ing at�50,000 volts or above, and • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground serv�ces • The City reserves the ngh�to a�rove location of all surFace mounted facilities, . All uncTerground util�ties, inclu ing sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets b the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets, and . S�ubs for service connections shall be long enough fo avoid disturb�ng the street improvements when service connections are made Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement Sect�on 18 810 120 C states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under rounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where exist�ng ut�li ies whicli are not under round will serve the development and the a�proval authonty determines that the cost and �echnical difficulty of under-grounding the u il�ties outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in con�unction with the deveTopment The determinat�on shall be on a case-by-case basis The most common, but not the only� such situation is a short frontage develo ment for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather �han the removal of above-ground utilities facilities An applicant for a development wh�ch is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under�rounding There are existing overhead utdity lines along the frontage of SW 74�'Avenue The previous approval for the industnai warehouse budding required a payment of the fee in-lieu of undergrounding Therefore, no additional assessment is required ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT Public Water S stem o a i iona pu ic water line work is necessary for this partition Storm Water Quali e i as agree to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM regulations established by Clean ater Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards �adopted by Resolution and Order No 00-7) wh�ch require the construction of on-site water quality facil�ties The facdities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created �mpervious surfaces In addit�on, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keep�ng the facility maintained through the year NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2002-00007lMETRO PARTITION PAGE 13 OF 15 Since Tract A wdl not be developed, no additional water quality measures are needed Gradin and Erosion Control esign an ons ruc ion Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearin�, and any other activity wh�cfi accelerates erosion Per CWS regulations, the applicant is requ�red to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits The Federal Clean Water Act re uires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued�or any development that will disturb five or more acres of land Since this site is not over five acres, the developer wdl not be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City pnor to construction Since the buddin on Parcel #1 has already been completed and no physical land disturbance is proposed for Trac�A at this time, there are no erosion control concems Site Permit Re uired e app ican is required to obtain a Site Permit from the Budding Division to cover all on-site private utility installations (water, sewer, storm, etc ) and driveway construction Since no additional utdities or dnveways are required, no site permit wdl be required Address Assi nments e � y o igar is respons�ble for assigning addresses for parcels with�n the C�ty of Tigard and witfiin the Urban Service Boundary(USB) The City of Tigard is responsible for assignmg addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and withm the Urban Service Boundary (USB) An addressmg fee in the amount of $30 00 per address shall be assessed This fee shall be paid to the City pnor to approval of the final plat For this pro�ect, the addressing fee wdl be $30 00 Surve Re uirements e app ican s ma p a shall contam State Plane Coordinates [NAD 83 (91)] on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positionmg system (GPS) geodetic control network These monuments shall be on the same line and sF�all be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary Along with the coordmates, the plat shall contam the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north These coordinates can be established by • GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey • By random traverse usmg conventional surveying methods In addition, the appIicanYs as-budt drawings shall be tied to the GPS network The applicant's engineer shall provide the Gity with an electronic file with points for each structure (manholes, catch basms, water valves, hydrants and other water system features in the development, and their respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD 83 (91� SECTION VI OTHER STAFF COMMENTS City of Tigard Forester has reviewed the proposal and mdicates that he is favorable to the proposal The City of Tigard police Department, Water Department, and Public Works Department were all notified of the proposal and did not respond SECTION VII AGENCY COMMENTS Tualatin Valiey Fire and Rescue has reviewed the proposal and found no conflicts with their mterests Portland General Electnc, NW Natural Gas, AT&T Cable, Verizon, Qwest Communications were all notified of the proposal and did not respond NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2002-00007/METRO PARTITION PAGE 14 OF 15 SECTION VIII PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice Notice was maded to X The applicant and owners � Owner of record within the required distance � Affected government agencies Final Decision THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON SEPTEMBER 20,2002 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON OCTOBER 5, 2002 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED �A e�al The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is maded All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18 390 040 G 1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18 390 040 G 2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the-Notice of Decision was mailed The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223 Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, sub�ect to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5 00 PM ON OCTOBER 4, 2002 Questions If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503)639-4171 � September 20, 2002 PREPARE BY Morgan racy DATE Associate Planner , > � � �'`N'`' September 20, 2002 APPROVED BY Richard Be ersdorff DATE Plannmg Manager i�curpinUnorgan\workspaceUnlp�rnlp2002-00007(metro)UnIp2002-00007 deasion doc NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2002-00007/METRO PARTITION PAGE 15 OF 15 � 'P,L . � � �ti � OEOORAPHIC IXFORNATION BYBTEM � � �^ �� , YICINITY MAP � � ER �� - - � � — �� WY -� MLP�002-00001 ��P 8 �� METRO PARTITION � BONITA RD � � O �{ � ', FOq FCRW ~-R� f (n i�D ._ �TI F¢P - 3� � � C ��0� e� a i D "�� a� ' � �� 9UL1 kfT' � t¢P �H D � ` � _ B�FJENOAD �J�1 f +PO D € Im Tiperd Aree Mep CARDINAL LN � N 0 200 400 600 Feet N 1=404 feet G � Z p p2 p City of Tigard �� REDWOOD LN Inlormetlon on t�is map is for generel loeation ony and should be venfied wilh the Development Services Drvision 73125 SW Mall Blvd �'_�y--��-� Tigertl OR 97223 � I I I (503)639-M1171 Nip/M+�nv a tigaM or us Community Development Plot date Jul 30 2002 C\magicWIAGIC03 APR . � � o� y 0 Vl ' °o 7 O � O N n � � N � � 20 FOOT CA$MCNT FOR � CONSIRUCRON OF AN � o ' OVERFLOW CHANNEL AS P£R DOCUM£NT NO B9-07B56 � SOOY�S 58"W 3B4 08 � I 4775 °o � — — — — — — — — — — — — — —_—_—_—_—_—_— — — — 30 FOOT SEH£R � — — — — — — �N £ASEM£NT AS P£R BOOK — � B62 PACf 686 °o � 5 00'DS SB W 25B 30 £AS£MENT FOR I^ CON57RUC710N OF AN � VFRFLOW CHANN£L AS PER DOCUblfN7 NO ��2�` B9—OIB56 � N 00'OS SB £90 00 v � � � � � � � ^ PARCEL 1 � 3 O 9B 1BJ SF 4 O � ti PARCEL 2 � 3 '' »ses sF u� � e o� N a � �1 q � �' � VI �OG'UMfNT NO 99_�J851p m � ti r � N �8.� O � p� Q � N � O �' a p Nsotio oo-w -� o .� � � S 021�9 00"E 255 66 � � 10 Ol NO2�9 00"W 201 06 �I — � _ �_ �-- � � Z -- - SW 74T" AVENUE `~ 1 ��<�a k I��"" z„T` � d lk d `�'9y�° � '�� w'�-�"� n '� ��°�s�� ~�� ° ��NOTIC�E"OF�TYPE�II�DECISION� �� #� ' '� �� 1a .� T;S y ,�$ 4 3X ",.� -� 1 `S k 4 'k f � °� a��i� ��'�" �n`. �mu ":s� ��' R a �' r �ta� a� x i 3x �� u�,� Cs3 r�, ax '�'"` � .n �Y� 7 �.WtY�� C�Z t�, r $a.P �e�*.'�"�!�;'�� s ,�?,.S a y 4,j � t �,RS.s,� L�$ '",�g'' s � �'� c� ak� 'EC � `' y a�i�,r �* �r v �� r� '� .,� �-., s ,�" x � v� a F k � � 41 m tPa f�qg"'uY�,,»a ,��t �`'0.�,w,-si M� �.��'RRr �"" �,�,y�,'`�z A °a 3'"a � "�r�-'� �� ,��2 �Y� � d,w��i�'t� �+` 5�,. y,��r"kpa'r„ � � � � � �� ,� � a� s "J s�a� a�n��"� % s�c ' A � � �� MIN�OR�LAND��PAR�TITION (MLP)�2002=00007�� ,�� ,� � ti� � � � �8�•��aF�,��5�� ,��.'.a E^o-�^'�,a G.f� �r �t-t„�°r '2 k s"" C p xs n �A- r � � F,r 'rx ��.t '�n `�,�w � , ��r`� �'^�'��' ��` .�� c� �j�� ^�.� �^'' ��^� �"�,, �� CITYOFTIOARD�u �.�.,° � �a�3`�`t r '�a �ra'��8� A < '�r� a'`��^a F �w a a e�s �w s.. #a � s s�i a a �`° � t�� x w s �'�'v�r�,� � F�'�°`� s�� a +'� � ¥3,R'r� t s�t B µ�xG �,s.�' is�$6�,'01Il1fji[tl1�e�¢TIB�t/lBJtt� a � r z t "" L 4 y�" � .. �� s � '�'� a if r s � �°�c a� x�c t #��`� �-a w�s��'�.° s .�r � �'.�� 44��METRO P/�R�TIT�I N� } 4 �� J�-�� {�x�� 4T�;1 �a � ��s��` w E��ir.., ��.� �� > � � �z� -��,,, s �� 4� ��S(:n A Better�Communi _� 120 DAYS =11/28/2002 SECTION I APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME METRO PARTITION CASE NO Minor Land Partition (MLP) MLP2002-00007 PROPOSAL The applicant is requesting a Minor Land Partition to partition one (1) existing 175,547 square foot lot into two (2) parcels One parcel is developed with an industrial buildmg complex The other parcel will be an open space tract APPLICANT Metro Parks and Greenspaces OWNER Fanno Creek Acres, LLC 600 NE Grand Avenue P O Box 159 Portland, OR 97232-2736 Aurora, OR 97002 ZONING DESIGNATION I-P Industrial Park District The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e g , restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e g , noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly LOCATION 14865 SW 74�' Avenue, WCTM 2S112AC Tax Lot, 01200 PROPOSED PARCEL 1 100,624 square feet PROPOSED TRACT A 74,923 square Feet APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA Community Development Code Chapters 18 390 (Decision-Making Procedures), 18 420 (Land Partitions), 18 530 (Industrial Zoning Districts), 18 705 (Access Egress and Circulation), 18 715 (Density Computations), 18 745 (Landscaping and Screening), 18 765 (Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements), 18 775 (Sensitive Lands), 18 790 (Tree Removal), 18 795 (Visual Clearance Areas), and 18 810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards) SECTION II DECISION }"�G ✓r�'��.�+��r�a �t '" u«s ��,k��x ,�vz �� y�.x 4'��-� � a��'�a �% e'ii°a'; '.�'o'�"�"s a�W a"'�'�. 7��.'S%��" � F `�K�� ,�a�s'�2�. ^'tiu' *^q��'sv�� Notice is�hereby� given��that�the�City E�of�Tigard �=�Community EDevelopment Director's�Qx�,d, esignee�t as,� r� � `� Y' +�. 'i,.�>.X � a� 4�� .*i�`i ;��r, ��i � `in�� 4s�ri �� ar'-�,q ^;�,s�"� s�i k�"`�y.� +K;""v�'8n'� � �P APPROVE�D"the�above�request��The�findings'and�conclusions on�which�the decisionais#�based are��noted� a �,� '� � �%,°a '� � � 4� �' ��x i�T`a,. �-.��an �k'�� ` ��s �'"f"� °�'� s�%t�'� �' �m the full de�cision available�at�City�Hall.� xf ��k"��° �� 3� 3��' �"� � � � k� � ��4 � PoS °�� + 1�+ys tiF yfc-. ,�+� Y� �,°'�.} A 3 �`,,,�� .�p;+ �r � �' ��s�tya�1 v �t��+-� ;�§ p�jt A � riyym��.�+�L�Y N `�g �.°i 1 2ZY,4 �G 3 4-"�" t C,�Y ��.L��''..7..�`m3Su �t'r,�.X°s db7"#�, k�E...�� ew C1'C4 `� (�§�;.,a�.L�`i.tfi",'+.� L +�" '^T krGq`F � ; Y ��` y,�^ � � ,y�' .. c � ,, %a�r y,��.ct �^ r�,{„yq,�, � ,� x s s ,��e�a.su s x �,„ ^,,,^. 9�a"'a r}�f 'iS��z £�r�'1„ 1 'Y..{,;} r�� ss.v� �°�g`"��$,�, r��a5 � S &� ,� 7 �"ff`h+� �k f Y,M'S'�.X »��°k g�� Mt'y'�`��1�� v� "�Z��`�� t',� �' ,e�'1 `�AY ['d �� ,s� jt8 ,Y��Z'A F � °r' �' a w � 7 a a v '� ��`z r f �q y`��.��.� ��THIS APPROV�AL�SHi4LL BE�VALID�F,�OR�18�MONTHS��,�� `�Y�� p 31� `'�}�S 't�' k#. �L ��`f s a�+w"°ntC." ��a.. �Yi t�,.^- iY ,vtN Yr.ak C ��+-`x.f+s s��-� � :��*��'�`� 5 n e�'� f-� a ) �. €�',^e5 '� F"o,�"'r,y, / *��''"' � �" � M �s` � }w.k. a `��'� a �� ` �� FROM�THE�EFFiEC�TIVE� �� ATE OF�THIS��DECISIO,N��#�4��`� �� °�� c^'� k,(Y i , 7,� x �n "R YF � R b �'4 �,. l 8 � 1f' S'` •-^�'Ar s t � n {i zz� ^�,r ,a` ��'�,��' � t es,�°� �,�a.y sa i v ya�'� gs`� } � ^cs.r �"'i' �.! r Y�r K� �,y�x<r�'�s �e r, �;��,�t�-t"zcg y''� �&�.�r 's .� z � � v^'..i�s>� �sa � � s� g t�� s � xa ��s � < , k ��'� d �-^ �f s � �., � �, � �. �# All documents and applicable critena in the above-noted file are avadable for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25G) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request SECTION III PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice otice mailed to X The applicant and owners —R— Owner of record within the required distance �— Affected government agencies r Final Decision THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON SEPTEMBER 20, 2002 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON OCTOBER 5, 2002 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED A��eal The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18 390 040 G 1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18 3S0 040 G 2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shali be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223 Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitEed by any party during the appeal hearing, sub�ect to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5 00 PM ON OCTOBER 4, 2002 Questions o��er information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Moraan Tracv at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223 ; �. s � °� � � YICIMITY MAP � o ———————_ � ,� � MLP2002 00001 � METRO PARTITION � BOMT HD 6 � � i r � r a � �� • GRDINAL LN pJ � � � � Cry fT1yeN OD N e.,.�r�+n �paw++n nm uu � yy I q �d qy' p$9� {`,4 � _S q^� ��6�8� rDLff.x OI9L605 �" g I C� AnM F 5 � 5� ry t I I 4 ^oqCl?°_J I p V � I �5 $ _ I= II W I I tl Ia I _ II � � � � � n I I �N � II I � II � II � II � II� e I II � � � II� a a W I P 7a i i j �° � � @��[tPaa i 1 � � I R�SB I I I � II t6L0�M I�6�6H5 � C'� OF TIGARD � MLP2002 00007 9^'E Pur� rJ METRO PARTITION Me le not to eeale NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE,LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USEAPPLICATION MINOR LAND PARTITION CITYOFTIGARD Commuraty�DeveCopment S�+aping/`i BetterCommumty DATE OF NOTICE July 31, 2002 FILE NUMBERS MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2002-00007 MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2002-00008 FILE NAME METRO PARTITIONS PROPOSAL The applicant is requesting two (2) Minor Land Partitions to partition finro (2) existing contiguous lots into four (4) parcels to create two (2) open space tracts for the purpose of connecting the Fanno Creek Greenway Regional Trail Corridor and to protect and enhance the associated riparian and uplands areas of Fanno and Ball Creeks An existing industnal bwiding wdl remain on one of the parcels, and the remaming parcel has an approved, but not yet constructed, office-warehouse development ZONE I-P Industrial Park Distnct The I-P zoning district provides appropnate locations for combining light manufacturing office and small-scale commercial uses, e g , restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting Only those light mdustrial uses with no off-site impacts, e g , noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments wdl be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA Community Development Code Chapters 18 390, 18 420, 18 530, 18 705, 18 715, 18 745, 18 765, 18 790, 18 795 and 18 810 LOCATION 14775 and 14865 SW 74t''Avenue, WCTM 2S112AC, Tax Lots 1200 and 900 YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5 00 PM ON AUGUST 14, 2002 All comments should be directed to Morgan Tracy, Associate Planner in the Planrnng Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223 You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171 ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITIN6 PRIOR TO 5 00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR SEPTEMBER 13. 2002 IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION . Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described m the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal, . Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response, . Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearmgs Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specif�city may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue Specific find�ngs directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence AFTER THE 14-DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE THE DIRECTOR�S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS . The application is accepted by the City . Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowmg a 14- day written comment period . The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agenaes . City Staff issues a wntten deasion . Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site, all owners of record of property located with�n 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll, any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site, and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are avadable for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department Copies of these items may be obtamed at a cost of $ 25 per page or the current rate charged for this service Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments " ; � � °r `� YI�INITY MAP � � � MLP2002 00001 s � � MLP2002 00008 � METRO PARTITIONS BONRA qp � p E� 6 g � J7 sy � 2 s i � UriD�raL W N � � � Gy fTgvd � �..w��a...�.�.� �m+m � l � REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITYOFTIGARD Communtty�DeveCopment SkaprngA Better Commumty DATE lulY 31,2002 , TO lim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Cnme Preuentlon Officer FROM Ci�l of Tigard Plannino Diuision STAFF CONTACT Mor9an TracY,Associate Planner[x24281 Phone [5031639-4171/Fax [5031684-1291 MINOR IAND PARTIi10 MLPI 2002-00001/ OR LAND PARTITION[MLPI 2002-00008 ➢ TITIONS Q REQUEST The applicant is requesting two (2) Minor Land Partitions to partition two (2) ex�sting cont�guous lots into four (4) parcels to create finro (2) open space tracts for the purpose of connecting the Fanno Creek Greenway Regional Trail Corridor and to protect and enhance the associated npanan and uplands areas of Fanno and Ball Creeks An existing industrial budding will remain on one of the parcels, and the remaining parcel has an approved, but not yet constructed, office-warehouse development LOCATION 14775 and 14865 SW 74`� Avenue, WCTM 2S112AC, Tax Lots 1200 and 900 ZONE I-P Industrial Park Distnct The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e g , restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts e g , noise, glare odor vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA Community Development Code Chapters 18 390, 18 420, 18 530, 18 705, 18 715, 18 745, 18 765, 18 790, 18 795 and 18 810 Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Appl�cant's Information for your review From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information avadable to our staff, a report and recommendation wdl be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY AUGUST 14. 2002 You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223 PL SE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY . We have reviewed the proposal and have no ob�ections to it Please contact of our office Please refer to the enclosed letter _ Written comments provided below Name 8 Number of Person Comment�ng � '1„ � REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITYOFTIGARD Commuraty�DeveCopment SFiaptngA�etter Communtty DATE luhl 31,2002 TO hn RoY,Properp�Manager/Public Works Department FROM Ci�l of Ti9ard Plannin9 Diuision STAFF CONTACT Mor9an Trac]I,Associate Planner[x24281 Phone [5031639-4111/Fax [5031684-1297 �--_�_ MINOR LAND PART ON[MLPI 2002-00001/MI R LAND PAR�ITION[MLPI 2002-00008 0-PA ITIONS Q REQUEST The applicant is requesting two (2) Minor Land Partitions to partition finro (2) existing contiguous lots into four (4) parcels to create finro (2) open space tracts for the purpose of connecting the Fanno Creek Greenway Regional Trail Corndor and to protect and enhance the associated riparian and uplands areas of Fanno and Ball Creeks An existing industrial building wdl remain on one of the parcels, and the remaining parcel has an approved, but not yet constructed, office-warehouse development LOCATION 14775 and 14865 SW 74`h Avenue, WCTM 2S112AC, Tax Lots 1200 and 900 ZONE I-P Industrial Park District The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e g , restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e g , noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA Community Development Code Chapters 18 390, 18 420, 18 530, 18 705, 18 715, 18 745, 18 765, 18 790, 18 795 and 18 810 Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Informat�on for your review From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY AUGUST 14. 2002 You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments If vou are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223 PL SE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY _ We have reviewed the proposal and have no ob�ections to it Please contact of our office Please refer to the enclosed letter _ Written comments provided below Name 8�Number of Person Commenting � N MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE September 6, 2002 TO Morgan Tracy, Assistant Planner FROM Bnan Rager, Development Review Engineer Dt� RE MLP 2002-00007, Metro Partition Street And Utility Imarovements Standards (Section 18 8101 Chapter 18 810 provides construction standards for the implementataon of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage The appl�cable standards are addressed below Streets Improvements Section 18 810 030 A 1 states that streets within a development and streets ad�acent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards Section 18 810 030 A 2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths Section 18 810 030 E requires a local commercial industrial street to have a 50-foot right-of-way width and a 36-foot paved section Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees This site lies ad�acent to SW 74th Avenue, which is classified as a local commercial industrial street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map At present, there is approximately 30 feet of ROW west of the centerline ad�acent to what will become Parcel 1, and 20 feet of ROW on the west side of the centerline ad�acent to what will become Parcel 2, according to the most recent tax assessor's map The applicant should dedicate additional ROW to provide 25 feet from the centerline ad�acent to Parcel 2 SW 74�h Avenue is paved but not fully improved to City standards Parcel 1 is already developed, and street improvements have been constructed ad�acent to that site Parcel 2 will become an open space area under Metro ownership and ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 2002-00007 Metro Partition PAGE 1 i , will not be developed, thereby resulting in no additional impact to the public transportation system For this reason, additional transportation improvements are not required Sidewalks Section 18 810 070 A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets Sidewalk improvements have been completed ad�acent to Parcel 1 No other sidewalk improvements are warranted by this partition because of the fact that Parcel 2 will remain in an undeveloped state Sanitary Sewers Sewers Required Section 18 810 090 A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance w�th the provis�ons set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management(as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan Over-sizing Section 18 810 090 C states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as pro�ected by the Comprehensive Plan There is an existing CWS trunk sewer to the west of the site ad�acent to Fanno Creek Since Parcel 2 will not be developed, no sewer lateral is needed for that site Therefore, no additional public sewer work is necessary Storm Drainage General Provisions Section 18 810 100 A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff Accommodat�on of Upstream Drainage Section 18 810 100 C states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development The City Engineer shall approve the necessary s�ze of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments) ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 2002-00007 Metro Partition PAGE 2 Ball Creek flows through Parcel 2 toward Fanno Creek The purpose of creating Parcel 2 is so that Metro can preserve the open space area ad�acent to Ball Creek and Fanno Creek This partition will not negatively impact the two creeks Effect on Downstream Drainage Section 18 810 100 D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from � the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Serv�ces �n 2000 and including any future rev�sions or amendments) Since Parcel 2 will not be developed, there will be no adverse impact to the downstream creek system Therefore, no additional storm drainage measures are needed Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways Bikeway Extension Section 18 810 110 A states that developments ad�oining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way SW 74th Avenue is not designated a bike facility ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS Public Water System No additional public water line work is necessary for this partition Storm Water Quality The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management(SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 2002-00007 Metro Partition PAGE 3 frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year Since Parcel 2 will not be developed, no additional water quality measures are needed Address Assignments The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB) An addressing fee in the amount of$ 30 00 per address shall be assessed This fee shall be paid to the City prior to approval of the final plat For this pro�ect, the addressing fee will be $30 00 Survey Requirements The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates [NAD 83 (91)] on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to gnd measurements and the angle from north to grid north These coordinates can be established by • GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey • By random traverse using conventional surveying methods In addition, the applicanYs as-built drawings shall be tied to the GPS nefinrork The applicant's engineer shall provide the City with an electronic file with points for each structure (manholes, catch basins, water valves, hydrants and other water system features) in the development, and their respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD 83 (91) ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 2002-00007 Metro Partition PAGE 4 Recommendations THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext 318) for review and approval Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee m the amount of$30 00 (STAFF CONTACT Shirley Treat, Engineering) Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of 74th Avenue to increase the right-of-way to 25 feet from the centerline ad�acent to Parcel 2 The description shall be tied to the existing right-of- way centerline The dedication document shall be on City forms Instructions are available from the Engineermg Department The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positionmg system (GPS) geodetic control network These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north These coordinates can be established by • GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey • By random traverse using conventional surveying methods Final Plat Application Submission Requirements A Submit for City review four (4) paper copies of the final plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to practice m Oregon, and necessary data or narrative B Attach a check in the amount of the current final plat review fee (Contact Plannmg/Engineenng Permit Technicians, at (503) 639-4171, ext 426) C The final plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92 05), Washington County, and by the City of Tigard D The right-of-way dedication for 74th Avenue shall be made on the final plat ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 2002-00007 Metro Partition PAGE 5 E NOTE Washmgton County will not begin their review of the final plat until they receive notice from the Engineering Department indicating that the City has reviewed the final plat and submitted comments to the applicant's surveyor F After the City and County have reviewed the final plat, submit finro mylar copies of the final plat for City Engineer signature (for partitions), or City Engineer and Community Development Director signatures (for subdivisions) Uug333\usr�depts\eng�bnanACOmmentsUnlpVnlp2002-00007 tloc ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 2002-00007 Metro Partition PAGE 6 Morgan Tracy- Metro Partitions doc �� f �� Page�1 TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE • SOUTH DIVISION COMMUNITY SERVICES • OPERATIONS • FIRE PREVENTION August13 2002 Morgan Tracy Associate Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard OR 97223 Re Metro Partitions Dear Morgan I have reviewed the submittal for the above named pro�ect and find no conflicts with our interests � Please contact me at(503)612-7010 with any additional questions Sincerely Eric T McMullen Eric T McMullen Deputy Fire Marshal 7401 SW Washo Court Swte 101 •Tualatin Oregon�� (503)fi12 7000•Fax(503)612 7003•www tvfr com REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITYOFTIGARD Community�Dei�eCopment S(npingA Better Community DATE: 1uh131,2002 T0: Dennis Koellermeier,Operatlons Mana9er/Water Department RECEIVED PLANNING FROM: Cit�of Tigard Planning Diuision STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Tracy,Associate Planner[x24281 A�� 2 � 2002 Phone: [5031639-4171/Fax: [5031684-)291 �in�j��aQ MINOR LAND PARTITION[MLPI 2002-00007/MINOR LAND PARTITION[MLPI 2002-00008 ➢ METRO PARTITIONS Q REQUEST: The applicant is requesting two (2) Minor Land Partitions to partition two (2) existing contiguous lots into four (4) parcels to create two (2) open space tracts for the purpose of connecting the Fanno Creek Greenway Regional Trail Corridor and to protect and enhance the associated riparian and uplands areas of Fanno and Ball Creeks.. An existing industrial building will remain on one of the parcels, and the remaining parcel has an approved, but not yet constructed, office-warehouse development. LOCATION: 14775 and 14865 SW 74'n Avenue; WCTM 2S112AC, Tax Lots 1200 and 900. ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.530, 18.705, 18.715, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Information for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: AUGUST 14, 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If vou are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FO�LOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: ,�,� We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. _ Written comments provided below: I Name 8 Number of Person Commenting• , ~ t, r- ot� ' �-' == _ � REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITYOFTIGARD Community�DeveCopment Shaping�BetterCommunity DATE: 1uh131,2002 T0: Matt Stine,Urpan�orester/Public Works Deparunent FROM: City of Tigard Piannin9 Division STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Trac]I,Associate Planner[x24281 Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-T297 MINOR LAND PARTITION[MLPI 2002-00007/MINOR LAND PARTITION[MLPI 2002-00008 ➢ METRO PARTITIONS Q REQUEST: The applicant is requesting two (2) Minor Land Partitions to partition two (2) existing contiguous lots into four (4) parcels to create two (2) open space tracts for the purpose of connecting the Fanno Creek Greenway Regional Trail Corridor and to protect and enhance the associated riparian and uplands areas of Fanno and Ball Creeks.. An existing industrial building will remain on one of the parcels, and the remaining parcel has an approved, but not yet constructed, office-warehouse development. LOCATION: 14775 and 14865 SW 74tn Avenue; WCTM 2S112AC, Tax Lots 1200 and 900. ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.530, 18.705, 18.715, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Information for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: AUGUST 14. 2002. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond bv the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: _ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. � Written comments provided below: �if�D Tc-L.r 5o w�lc�s �i 1(�� M t / MA-�7"�r�M= Name 8 Number of Person Commenting: - r REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITYOFTIGARD Commuraty�DeveCopment ShaptngA�etter Commumty DATE luhl 31,2002 TO PER ATTACHED FROM Ci�l of Ti9ard Plamm�9 Diuision STAFF CONTACT Morgan Trac]I,Associate Planner[x24281 Phone [5031639-4171/Fax [5031684-1291 MINOR LAND PARTITION[MLPI 2002-00001/MINOR LAND PARTI�ION[MLPI 2002-00008 ➢ METRO PARTITIONS Q REQUEST The applicant is requesting two (2) Minor Land Partitions to partition two (2) existing contiguous Iots into four (4) parcels to create two (2) open space tracts for the purpose of connecting the Fanno Creek Greenway Regional Trail Corridor and to protect and enhance the associated ripanan and uplands areas of Fanno and Ball Creeks An existing industrial building will remain on one of the parcels, and the remainmg parcel has an approved, but not yet constructed, office-warehouse development LOCATION 14775 and 14865 SW 74�' Avenue, WCTM 2S112AC, Tax Lots 1200 and 900 ZONE I-P Industrial Park Distnct The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e g , restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e g , noise, glare, odor vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestnan-friendly APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA Community Development Code Chapters 18 390, 18 420, 18 530, 18 705, 18 715, 18 745, 18 765, 18 790, 18 795 and 18 810 Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Appiicant's Information for your review From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal m the near future If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY AUGUST 14, 2002 You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writmg as soon as possible If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223 PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY _ We have reviewed the proposal and have no ob�ections to it Please contact of our office Please refer to the enclosed letter _ Written comments provided below Name 8 Number of Person Commenting . „ CITY � TIGARD REQUEST FOR C0� ENTS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS �� . FILE NOS.: ' '�' FILE NAME: CITIZEN INYOLYEMENT TEAMS 14-DAY PENDING APPLICATION NOTICE TO CIT AREA: ❑Central ❑East �South ❑West OProposal Descrip.in Library CIT Book CITY OFflCES LONG RANGE PLANNING/Barbara Shields,Planning Mgc COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPTJPIanning-Engineering Techs. a' POLICE DEPTJJim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer _BUILDING DIVISIONlGary Lampella,Building Official ��NGINEERING DEPTJBrian Rager,Dvlpmnt.Review Engineer✓"WATER DEPTJDennis Koellermeier,Operations Mgr. CiTY ADMINISTRATIONlCathy Wheatley,City Recorder �"PUBLIC WORKS/John Roy,Property Manager �PUBLIC WORKS/Matt Stine,Urban Forester ✓PLANNER—POST PROJECT SITE IF A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM-10 BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING! _C.D./Sherman Casper,Permit Coord.(sowcuP re:riF� SPECIAL DISTRICTS TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.+I� � TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE� TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT� ✓ CLEANWATER SERVICES+1� Pianning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Lee Walker/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N.First Avenue Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 LOCAL AND STATE IURISDICflONS CITY OF BEAVERTON � CITY OF TUALATIN� OR.DEPT.OF FISH 8 WILDLIFE OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS _ Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue Jennifer Goodridge _ Irish Bunnell,Devebqnerrt Services PO Box 369 PO Box 59 775 Summer Street NE PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Salem,OR 97301-1279 Beaverton,OR 97076 _ OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE 8 PLANNING � _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE _ CITY OF DURHAM� 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland.OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO BOX 23483 BOb Kftlght,oata rtesou�cecenie�(zcn) US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 Paulette Allen,Growth ManagemeM Coordinalor OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.8�DVLP Kathryn Harris _ Mel Huie,GreenspatesCooiOinator(CPA/ZOA) L2Ry F�enCh(comp.P�annmeridmems on�y� Routing CENWP-OP-G CITY OF KING CITY� _ Jennifer Budhabhatti,Regional Planner(Wetlands) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 PO Box 2946 City Manager _ C.D.Manager,GmwthManapemeMServices Salem,OR 97301-2540 Portland,OR 97208-2946 15300 SW 116th Avenue King City,OR 97224 WASHINGTON COUNTY� OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY�voweniries in nreal _OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) Dept.of Land Use&Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Aeronautics Division�nno�oPO�e Towe�S� 155 N.First Avenue CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO� Routing TTRC—Att�: Renae Ferrera Tom Highland,Plannirg Suite 350,MS 13 P�anning Director PO Box 3621 3040 25th Street,SE Hilisboro.OR 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 Salem,OR 97310 Brent Curtis tcPn� Lake Oswego,OR 97034 _Gregg Leion ccan� _ OR.DEP7.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ODOT,REGION 1 � Anne LaMountain pcauRe� CITY OF PORTLAND tNony ro�w��a�a5 a„a ro��u��e��o��i imP�� _Sonya Kazen,Devebpme�ri Review Coordinator Phil Healy�icwuRa� David Knowles,P�a��s��ea�o��. Regional Administrato� Carl Toland, Right-of-Way Section Na��p�5� Steve Conway�c�e�i Avrn.> Portland Building 106,Rm. 1002 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders Sr.Cartographer icrnac�>res,a 1120 SW Fifth Avenue Portland.OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 Jim Nims czcn�Ms is Portland,OR 97204 _Doria Mateja�zca�MS,a _ WCCCA(911)(MOnopole Towers) ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A�IE Dave Austin Jane Estes,PertnitSpecialist 17911 NW Evergreen Parkway 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350 Beaverton,OR 97006 Portland,OR 97221-2414 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(eur�ington Northem/Santa Fe R/R Predecessor) Robert 1.Melbo,President 8 General Manager 110 W. 10th Avenue Albany,OR 97321 SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS 4' ATBT CABLE TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Paimer�n��a�w�o�iY� Pat McGann (If Projea is Within%Mile of A Transd Route) 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Ben Baldwin,Project Planner Portiand,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 BeaveRon,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland,OR 97232 e' PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC �NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY W VERIZON ✓QWEST COMMUNICATIONS Jim VanKleek,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord. Ken Perdue,Engineering Jeri Cella,Engineering 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue PO Box 1100 8021 SW Capitoi Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonvilie,OR 97070 PoRland,OR 97209-3991 BeaveRon,OR 97075-1100 Portland,OR 97219 TIGARDITUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 _ AT&T CABLE cnpo,.EdH,vr,.wv� Marsha Butler,Administrative O�ces Jan Youngquist,Demographics&Planning Dept. Diana Carpenter 6960 SW Sandburg Street 16550 SW Merlo Road 3500 SW Bond Street Tigard,OR 97223-8039 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 PoRland,OR 97232 � INDICATES AUTOMpTIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN 500' OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANY/ALL CITY PROJECTS(Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notify). h:�patty�masters�rtequest For Comments Not�ecation�ist 2.doc (Revised: s-nnar-oz) MAILING RECORDS , � , � AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITYOFTIfiARD �ommuraty�Development S(rapingA�detterCommuraty I, �atncca G Lunsf orcf, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a SenzorAd'mmutrative Spec�aCut for the �zty of7"�gard, 'Waskangton County, Oregon and that I served the following (Chedc AppropAate Box(s)Bebw} ❑x NOflCE OF DECISION FOR MLP2002 00001/METRO PARTITION Q AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) � City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice bemg hereto attached, marked EXhlblt"A",and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s) marked b(hlblt'B",and by reference made a part hereof, o� Seatemder 20.2002,and deposited in the United States Mad on SeptCllibel'20,2002, postage prepaid (Person that Pre ared Notice) S7A�o�o��Goa� ) Coun�y of zNas mgton �ss C4ty of�igard ) c,� Subscribed and sworn/affrmed before me on the ��7 da of 2002 Y � OFFICIAL SEAL � � DIANE AA JELDERKS NOTARY PUB�IGOREGOM COMMISSION NO a26578 MY COMMISSION�XPIAES SEPT n7 ppp3 Nhl Commission " es 7 U 3 �EX�z��' � NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2002-00007 CITYOFTIOARD METRO PARTITION Communzty�DeveCopment S�ta ABetterCommum 120 DAYS =11/28/2002 SECTION I APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME METRO PARTITION CASE NO Minor Land Partition (MLP) MLP2002-00007 PROPOSAL The applicant is requesting a Minor Land Partition to partition one (1) existing 175,547 square foot lot into two (2) parcels One parcel is developed with an industrial building complex The other parcel will be an open space tract APPLICANT Metro Parks and Greenspaces OWNER Fanno Creek Acres, LLC 600 NE Grand Avenue P O Box 159 Portland, OR 97232-2736 Aurora, OR 97002 ZONING DESIGNATION I-P Industrial Park District The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e g , restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e g , noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian- friendly LOCATION 14865 SW 74�' Avenue, WCTM 2S112AC Tax Lot, 01200 PROPOSED PARCEL 1 100,624 square feet PROPOSED TRACT A 74,923 square Feet APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA Community Development Code Chapters 18 390 (Decision-Making Procedures), 18 420 (Land Partitions), 18 530 (Industrial Zoning Districts), 18 705 (Access Egress and Circulation), 18 715 (Density Computations), 18 745 (Landscaping and Screening), 18 765 (Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements), 18 775 (Sensitive Lands), 18 790 (Tree Removal), 18 795 (Visual Clearance Areas), and 18 810 (Street and Utdity Improvement Standards) SECTION II DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request sub�ect to certain conditions The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VI NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2002-00007/METRO PARTITION PAGE 1 OF 15 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT u mi o e ngineering epa men rian ager, , ex or review an approval 1 Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall ay an addressing fee in the amount of $30 00 (STAFF CONTACT Shirley Treat, Engineering� 2 Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of 74�' Avenue to increase the right-of-way to 25 feet from the centerline ad�acen} to Tract A The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline The dedication document shall be on City forms Instructions are available from the Engineenng Department 3 The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to the Citjr's global posifioning system (GPS) geodetic control network These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north These coordinates can be establishedby • GPS tie nefinrorked to the City's GPS survey • By random traverse using conventional surveying methods 4 Final Plat Application Submission Requirements A Submit for City review four (4) paper copies of the final plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative B Attach a check in the amount of the current final plat review fee (Contact Plannmg/En�ineering Permit Technicians, at (503) 639-4171, ext 2421) C The final pla and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (OF�S 92 05), Washington County, and by the City of Tigard D The ri ht-of-way dedication for 74 Avenue shall be made on the final plat E NOT� Washington County will not begin their review of the final plat until they receive notice from the Engineering Department indicating that the City has reviewed the final plat and submitted comments to the applicant's surveyor F After the City and County have reviewed the finaf plat, submit two mylar copies of the final plat for City Engineer signature (for partitions), or City Engineer and Community Development Director signatures (for subdivisions) Submit to the Planning Department (Morgan Tracy, 639-4171, ext 2428) for review and approval 5 Tract A shall be designated as open space on the plat The following note shall also be placed on the final plat "No development shall be permitted on Tract A that is inconsistent with the mtent of providin open space Public access and structures necessary for providing public access, provision o�below grade utdities, and structures and grading for stormwater management may be permissible sub�ect to prior sensitive lands review and approval " 6 The appIicanUowner shall certify their acknowledgement that the approval of this partition does not authorize the construction of an access drive or any other site improvements on Tract A Such improvements will require sensitive lands review and will further need to meet the standards of Chapfer 18 705 7 The applicanUowner shall record either a blanket easement to the City allowing a bikeway to be extended through Tract A, or shall coordinate with the City (Contact Duane Roberts, ext 2444)to establish a specific easement for the bikeway NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2002-00007/METRO PARTITION PAGE 2 OF 15 THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION NOTED UNDER THE PROCESS AND APPEAL SECTION OF THIS DECISION SECTION III BACKGROUND INFORMATION Pro ert Histo e su �ect parcel is located within the City of Tigard The property is designated as Industrial Park and open space on the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map A record search indicates that a Site Development Review (SDR 98-00019) was approved in 1998 This SDR also involved a sensitive lands (water resources overlay) review A lot Ime ad�ustment (MIS2000-00012)was approved in 2000 No other land use approvals were found to be on file Site Information and Pro osal Descri tions e su �ect site is ocate on t e west si e of 74�' Avenue, south of Bonita Road The properties to the north and south have the same Industrial Park (I-P) zoning as the sub�ect site To the north is a vacant parcel that has an approved but unconstructed industrial 6udding To the south is ar�under developed property used for outside storage Properties to the east, on the opposite side of 74 Avenue and the Burlingfon Northem Rail Line, are zoned for Light Industrial development (I-L) To the west, on the opposite side of Fanno Creek, properties are zoned R-7 and R-12 for Medium Density Residential development A larg e apartment complex is located to the northwest of the subJect site, on the opposite side of Fanno Creek The previous SDR approval is for a 25,300 square foot office/warehouse budding and associated parking and landscaping in the northeast portion of the site (Fanno Creek Business Park) The requested partition will segregate the developed portion of the site from the constrained flood plain and water resource portion of the site SECTION IV PUBLIC COMMENTS The City maded notice to property owners within 500 feet of the sub�ect site providing them an opportunity to comment No comments were received SECTION V SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA A summary of the applicable criteria in this case in the Chapter order in which they are addressed in this decision are as follows A Land Partitions 18 420 (Land Partitions) B Zonin Districts 18 53�(Industrial Zoning Districts) C Specific Development Standards 18 705 Access, Egress & Circulation) 18 715 Density Computations) 18 725 Environmental PerFormance Standards) 18 765 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements) 18 775 Sensitive Lands) 18 790 Tree Removal) 18 795 isual Clearance) 18 390 Impact Study Section 18 390 040) D Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18 810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards) NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2002-00007/METRO PARTITION PAGE 3 OF 15 The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters 18 720 (Desi n Compatibdity), 18 730 (Exceptions to Development Sfandards), 18 742 (Home Occupations), 18 7�5 (Landscaping and Screening 18 750 Manufactured/Mobde Home Regufations), 18 755 (Mixed Solid Waste & Recyclable Storage�, 18 760 �Nonconforming Situations), 18 780 (Signs), 18 785 (Temporary Uses), and 18 798 (Wireless Communication Facilities) These chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards SECTION VI APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Land Partitions (18 420) The applicant's preliminary partition plat indicates two parcels (Parcel #1 and Parcel #2) being created The applicant has also indicated thaf the constrained parcel will be set aside as open space As such, it shall be noted for the purposes of this partition review that the developable portion of the site wdl be referred to as Parcel #1, and the open space portion of the site wdl be referred to as Tract A The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations, The proposed partition complies or can be made to comply with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations as demonstrated by the analysis contained within this administrative decision and through the imposition of conditions of development approval All necessary conditions must be satisfied as part of the development and building process Therefore, this cnterion is met There are adequate public facilities available to serve the proposal, Public facilities are discussed in detail later in this decision under Chapter 18 810 (Street & Utility Improvement Standards) Based on the analysis provided herein, Staff finds that adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposal It should be noted that since the parcel being created will be for open space purposes, public facilities such as sewer and water, will not be required Therefore, this criterion is met All proposed improvements meet City and applicable agency standards, and The public facilities and proposed improvements are discussed and conditioned later in this decision under Chapter 18 810 (Street & Utility Improvement Standards) Improvements will be reviewed as part of the permit process and during construction, at which time the appropriate review authority will ensure that City and applicable agency standards are met Based on the analysis in this decision, Staff finds that this criterion is met All proposed lots conform to the specific requirements below The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning district The minimum lot width required for the I-P zoning district is 50 feet Parcel #1 is approximately 255 feet in width, Tract A is approximately 200 feet wide Therefore, this standard has been met The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district In the case of a flag lot, the accessway may not be included in �he lot area There is no minimum lot area re uirement in the I-P zoning district The proposed partition creates two (2) lots that are 100,624 and 74,9�3 square feet in size This criterion has been satisfied Each lot created through the partit�on�rocess shall front a public nght-of-way by at least 15 feet or have a legally recorded minimum 1 foot wide access easement The proposed partition will result in one developable parcel and one open space tract Whde it is not necessary to bring vehicular access to the open space tract, state law requires that each new lot be provided with a means of access, including the open space tract The open space tract will abut the public right of way for 201 feet The applicant has also applied for a minor land partition of the property NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2002-00007/METRO PARTITION PAGE 4 OF 15 to the south to create an open space tract The applicant may wish to note that an access easement is required for that tract, and that such an easement could be recorded across this open space tract to achieve that result As both proposed parcels in this application have frontage, this standard is met Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district Setbacks for the I-P zoning district are as follows front, 35 feet, side, 0 feet, and rear, 50 feet (when abutting a residential zone, 0 feet when not) The proposed partition will not alter compliance with the front yard, side yard, or rear yard setbacks The newly created o�en space parcel wdl separate the new development parcel from the residential zone, and therefore a 0-foot setback will apply to the rear of this pro�ect as well It should be noted that the open space tract is 50 feet wide where fhe property abuts the residential zone This criterion is met When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard, provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet Structures shall generally be located so as to maximize separation from existing structures Neither proposed parcels are flag lots This standard is not relevant A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18 745 040 Screening may also be required to maintain pnvacy for abutting lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed development As the proposed Tract A is an open space tract, there will be no accessway constructed, and thus no screen required The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway would have a detrimental effect on fire-fighting capabilities The fire district (TVFR� has reviewed the �roposal and had no ob�ections or concerns related to this proposal Refer to the 'Agency Comments' section on page 14 Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one lot a reciprocal easement which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded wit� the approved partition map No common driveway is proposed, and no driveway will be developed for the open space tract Any access way shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18 705, Access, Egress and Circulation This standard is addressed under Chapter 18 705 (Access, Egress and Circulation) later in this decision Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or ad�acent to the one-hundred year floodplain, the city shall re4uire consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway ad�oining and within the floodplain This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan Land partitions are considered "development" by the Tigard Development Code The proposed parcels are ad�acent to and within the 100-year floodplain The applicant has indicated that the proposed open space tract is to close the gaps in the Fanno Creek Greenway Regional Trad Corridor The inclusion of this open space to a public entity for pathway purposes satisfies the intent of this standard An application for a variance to the standards prescribed in this chapter shall be made in accordance with Chapter 18 370, Variances and Ad�ustments The applications for the partition and variance(s)/ad�ustment(s)will be processed concurrently No variances or adJustments have been submitted with this application Therefore, this standard does not apply NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2002-00007/METRO PARTITION PAGE 5 OF 15 Industrial Zoninq Districts (18 530) Development standards in industrial zonin districts are contained in Table 18 30 2 below T�BLE 18 530 2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN INDUSTRIAL ZONES STANDARD I-P Parcel 1 Tract A Mirnmum Lot Size None 74 923 s ft 100 624 s ft Average Mmimum Lot Width 50 ft 255 ft 200 ft Minimum Setbacks -Front yard 35 ft 50 ft N/A -Side facing street on comer&through lots 20 ft N/A N/A -Side yard 0/50 ft[1] 60 ft N/A -Rear yard 0/50 ft[1 J 80 ft N/A -Distance between property line and front of garage -- — — -Side Yard Setbacks for Flag Lots DC 18 420 050 A 4 (e * 10 ft N/A N/A Maximum Hei ht 45 ft 28 ft N/A Mawmum Lot Coverage 75% Can be met 0% Mirnmum Landsca e Re wrement 25% Can be met 100% [1]No setbadc shall be reqwred except 50 feet shall be reqwred where the zone abuts a residenhal zoning disfict 'Not a part of this table but has been Induded for reference There is no minimum lot size in the I-P zone The proposed lot sizes of 74,923 and 100,624 square feet meet this standard Parcel #1 is developed with an industrial warehouse building The proposed partition has taken into consideration the approved development to ensure that both setbacks and lot coverage requirements will be maintained by the development after the lot is modified Tract A is vacant and is proposed for open space No buildings are proposed on this tract, and thus setback and height requirements are not relevant Future development will be reviewed through the building permit process to ensure compliance with the I-P development standards Setback standards, required by Table 18 510 2 will apply to all future development of the proposed Iots It shall be noted that Tract A is designated for open space and will not permit development inconsistent with the intent of the open space Any subsequent lot line ad�ustments to increase the size of the developable portion of the property may require sensitive lands review (Chapter 18 775) FINDING Based on the analysis above and the imposition of the following condition, the Industrial Zoning District Standards for Parcel #1 and Tract A have been met CONDITION Tract A shall be designated as open space on the plat No development shall be permitted which is inconsistent with the intent of providing open space Public access and structures necessary for providing public access, provision of below grade utdities, and structures and grading for stormwater management may be permissible sub�ect to prior sensitive lands review approval Access, Eqress and Circulation (18 705) Continuin� obli�ation of property owner The provisions and maintenance of access and e ress stipulated in this title are continuing requirements for the use of any structure or parcel o� real property in the City Owners of each parcel wdl be under the obligation to provide and maintain access to their own property This provision has been met Access Plan requirements No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by th�s cha�ter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled The applicant shall submit a site plan The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement The access to the developed portion of the property has already been constructed As no development is proposed on Tract A, physical construction of the access wdl not be required NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2002-00007/METRO PARTITION PAGE 6 OF 15 Joint Access Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize �ointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the �oint use and copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the �ity No Joint access is proposed in this partition, therefore, no access easement wdl be required Public street access All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18 705 030H and 18 705 0301 shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis All proposed parcels will have access to SW 74�' Avenue, a public street Both proposed parcels will directly abut the street Minimum access requirements for residential use Prrvate residential access drives shall be provided and maintained in accordance with the provisions of the Uniform Fire Code The proposed parcels will have industnal and open space uses This standard is not applicable Access drives in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the turning around of fire apparatus by one of the following a) A circular, paved surface having a minimum turn radius measured from center point to outside edge of 35 feet, b) A hammerhead- configured, paved surface with each leg of tFie hammerhead having a minimum depth of 40 feet and a minimum width of 20 feet, c) The maximum cross slope of a required turnaround is 5% The access to the industrial development on Parcel #1 satisfies these requirements The access drive on Tract A will not be constructed, and therefore no tum around is required if in the future, an emergency access is proposed, these standards will need to be met FINDING Based on the analysis above, Staff finds the Access, Egress and Circulation Standards have not been met Demonstration of compliance will be assured through the building permit review CONDITION The approval of this partition does not authorize the construction of an access drive or any other site improvements on Tract A Such improvements will require sensitive lands review and will further need to meet the standards of Chapter 18 705 Densitv Computations (18 715) A Definition of net development area Net development area, in acres, shall be determined by subtracting the following land area(s) from the gross acres, which is all of the land included in the legal description of the property to be developed 1 All sensitive land areas 2 All land dedicated to the public for park purposes, 3 All land dedicated for public rights-of-way 4 All land proposed for private streets, and 5 A lot of at least the size required by the applicable base zoning district, if an existing dwelling is to remain on the site B Calculating maximum number of residential units To calculate the maximum number of residential units per net acre, divide the number of square feet in the net acres by the minimum number of square feet required for each lot in the applicable zoning district C Calculat�ng minimum number of residential units As required by Section 18 510 040, the minimum number of residential units per net acre shall be calculated b multiplying the maximum number of units determined in Subsection B above by 80% (0 8� The standards for Density computation address the intensity of residential land uses and is not applicable to this proposal as it is industrially zoned land NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2002-00007/METRO PARTITION PAGE 7 OF 15 FINDING The Density Computation Standards have been met Landscapinq and Screen�nq (18 745) Street trees Section 18 745 040 ec ion 45 040 A All development pro�ects fronting on a public street, prrvate street or a private driveway more than 100 feet in length approved after the adoption of this title shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with fhe standards in Section 18 745 040C This proposed pro�ect has frontage on SW 74�' Avenue Parcel #1 has installed street trees as part of the required street improvements While street trees are required on Tract A, installation of such trees shall occur when budding permits are issued Building permits for Tract A will require a separate sensitive lands review TF�ere are existing trees along the site frontage that may be adequate to serve as street trees, but this determination will require seekmg an ad�ustment to this standard In the meantime, the installation of required street trees will be deferred untd actual site improvements are proposed FINDING The requirement for planting street trees along the access drive is not met In order to meet this requirement the applicant shall satisfy the following condition CONDITION Street trees will be required along the frontage of SW 74�' Avenue at the time physical construction of site improvements occur (subJect to sensitive lands review) Planting of these street trees shalf be in accordance with the size and spacing standards under TDC Section 18 745 040 C Tree Removal (18 790) ree p an or e p anting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot„ parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed Protection is preferred over removal wherever possible The applicant has not submitted a tree plan as no trees are proposed for removal, and no physical construction is proposed that would require tree protection measures All the trees on Tract A wdl be retained Any subsequent tree removal for site improvements on Tract A wdl require tree removal permits as they are located in a sensitive land area Trees on Parcel #1 will not require removal as the improvements on this parcel have already been constructed FINDING Based on the analysis above, Staff finds that the Tree Removal Standards are met Visual Clearance Areas 18 795 T�iis(. ap er requires a a c ear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property ad�acent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private drrveway A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle hedgeL plantin , fence, wall structure or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three �3) feet in heigh� The code provides t'hat obstructions that may be located in this area s-hall be visually clear between three (3) and ei ht (8) feet in height Trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches be�low eight�8) feet are removed A visuaf clearance area is the triangular area formed b measuring from t e corner, 30-feet along the right of way and along the driveway and connec�ing these fwo points with a straight line Visual clearance was reviewed as part of the prior site development review approval for the developable portion of the site Tract A wdl not have a driveway constructed and therefore is not required to have a visual clearance area FINDING Based on the analysis above, Staff finds that the Vision Clearance Standards are met Im act Stud (18 390 ec ion b`�09 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application " Section 18 390 040 states that the apQlicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2002-00007/METRO PARTITION PAGE 8 OF 15 minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for Qublic right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supporEs that the real prope� dedication is not roughly proportional to the proJected impacts of the development Section 1 390 040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public The applicant has submitted an impact study The applicant will not be required to physically improve the street due to the limited nature of the impacts of this partition The street frontage has been improved alon the frontage of Parcel #1 as part of developing the industrial building Since the partition request will no� result in further development, beyond what has previously been approved, there will be no traffic, noise, schools, parks, water, sewer, or street related impacts Potential impacts related to the development of Parcel#1 were examined and conditioned as necessary to mitigate for any adverse affects Therefore, this standard is satisfied There is no Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) required for creation of this open space tract TIFs associated witFi development on Parcel #1 were conditioned in a previous decision and will be assessed at time of budding permit application PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS Street And Utilitv Improvements Standards (Section 18 810) ap er provicles cons ruc ion s an ar s or e implementation of public and private _ facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage The applicable standards are addressed below Streets Improvements Section 18 810 030 A 1 states that streets within a development and streets ad�acent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards Section 18 810 030 A 2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths Section 18 810 030 E requires a local residential street to have a 42 to 50-foot right-of-way width and a 24 to ��-foot paved section Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees This site lies ad�acent to SW 74"' Avenue, which is classified as a local commercial industrial street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map At present, there is approximately 30 feet of ROW west of the centerline ad�acent to what will become Parcel 1, and 20 feet of ROW on the west side of the centerline ad�acent to what wdl become Tract A, according to the most recent tax assesso�'s map The applicant should dedicate additional ROW to provide 25 feet from the centerline ad�acent to Tract A The applicant has proposed to dedicate this right of way to comply with these requirements SW 74�' Avenue is paved but not fully improved to City standards Parcel 1 is already developed, and street improvements have been constructed ad�acent {o that site Tract A wdl become an open space area under Metro ownership and will not be developed, thereby resulting in no additional impact to the public transportation system For this reason, additional transportation improvements beyond the right of way dedication are not required NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2002-00007/METRO PARTITION PAGE 9 OF 15 Future Street Plan and Extension of Streets Section 18 810 030(F) states that a future street plan shall be filed which shows the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land division This section also states that where it is necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future division of ad�oining land, streets shall be extended to fhe boundary lines of the tract to be developed and a barncade shall be constructed at the end of the street These street stubs to ad�oining properties are not considered to be cul-de-sacs since they are intended to continue as through streets at such time as the ad�oining property is developed A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the property owners which shall not be removed until authorized by the City Engineer, the cost of which shall be included in the street construction cost Temporary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de- sac bulbs shall be constructed for stub streets in excess of 150 feet in length This proposed development lies befinreen SW 74�' Avenue and Fanno Creek Street connection to ad�acent lots is impractical due to the need for a bridge crossing As there is an existing crossing at SW Bonita Road approximately 500 feet to the north, there is no particular need for an internal street system Cul-de-sacs 18 810 030 K states that a cul-de-sac shall be no more than 200 feet long, shall not provide access to greater than 20 dwelling units, and shall only be used when environmental or topo�raphical constraints, existin� development pattern, or strict adherence to other standards in this code preclude street extension and through circulation • All cul-de-sacs shall terminate with a turnaround Use of turnaround configurations other than circular, shall be approved by the City Engineer, and . The length of the cul-de-sac shall be measured along the centerline of the roadway from the near side of the intersecting street to the farthest point of the cul-de-sac . If a cul-de-sac �s more than 300 feet long, a lighted direct pathway to an ad�acent street may be required to be provided and dedicated to the City The applicant's plan does not include a proposed cul-de-sac, therefore this standard is not applicable Street Alignment and Connections Section 18 810 030(G) rec�uires all local streets which abut a development site shall be extended within the site to provide through circulation when not precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns or strict adherence to other standards in this code A street connection or extension is precluded when it is not possible to redesign, or reconfigure the street pattern to provide required extensions In the case of environmental or topographical constraints, the mere presence of a constraint is not sufficient to show that a street connection is not possible The applicant must show why the constraint precludes some reasonable street connection There are no existing public streets that stub into this site Environmental constraints preclude further street extensions on or across this site Access to Arterials and Ma�or Collectors Section 18 810 030 P states that where a development abuts or is traversed by an existing or proposed arterial or ma�or collector street, the development design shall provide adequate protection for residenfial �roperties and shall separate residential access and through fraffic, or if separation is not feasible, the design shall minimize the traffic conflicts The design shall include any of the following . A parallel access street along the arterial or ma�or collector, • Lots of suitable depth abutting the arterial or ma�or collector to provide adequate buffering with frontage along another sfreet, • Screen �lanting at the rear or side property line to be contained in a nonaccess reservation along the artenal or ma�or collector, or • Other treatment suitable to meet the ob�ectrves of this subsection, . If a lot has access to two streets with different classifications, primary access should be from the lower classification street SW 74�' Avenue is classified as a local industrial street The proposed development is neither abutting nor traversed by existing or proposed arterial or collector streets Therefore, this standard is not applicable NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2002-00007/METRO PARTITION PAGE 10 OF 15 Private Streets Section 18 810 030 S states that design standards for prrvate streets shall be established by the City Engineer The City shall require legal assurances for the continued maintenance of private streets, such as a recorded maintenance agreement Pnvate streets serving more than six dwelling units are permitted only within planned developments, mobile home parks, and multi-family residential developments No pnvate streets are proposed with this development Therefore this standard is not applicable Block Designs - Section 18 810 040 A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be desi�ned with due re ard to providing adequate buifding sites for the use contemplated consideration of needs�or convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic anc� recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography Block Sizes Section 18 810 040 B 1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of-way line except • Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or, pre�xistin development or, . For blocks ad�acen� to arterial streets, limited access highways, ma�or collectors or railroads • For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access The proposed parcels are located along an existing local street, which is in conformance with the block design standards Regardless, this proposal is not creating any additional streets and therefore this standard is not applicable Section 18 810 040 B 2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is not possible Spacing between connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where �recluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards in the code The proposed Tract A will eventually be part of a regional bike and pedestrian pathway system which will provide connections to other areas along the Fanno Creek trad Lots - Size and Shape Section 18 810 060(A) prohibits lot depth from beiny more than 2 5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1 5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district Tract A is 450 feet deep and 200 feet wide measured at the setback and is therefore 2 25 times the lot width Parcel #1 is 255 feet wide and 405 feet deep, or 1 59 times the lot width Therefore, this standard is met Lot Frontage Section 18 810 060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley In the case of a land partition, 18 420 050 A 4 c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet Parcel #1 has 255 feet of frontage Tract A has 201 feet of fronta�e Each of the proposed lots meets the 15-foot minimum frontage requirement, therefore this standard is met Sidewalks Section 18 810 070 A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets Street improvements, mcluding constructing sidewalks, were constructed as part of the development on Parcel #1 as required by the previous Site Development Review approval Since Tract A will remain open space, there is no increase to street traffic or site access associated with this partition proposal As the site will not generate any additional traffic, or access demand, sidewalks will not be required The applicant shall note that any future improvement to the site may trigger the need for improving the street frontage, as determined through a subsequent development review This criterion is satisfied NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2002-00007/METRO PARTITION PAGE 11 OF 15 Sanitary Sewers Sewers Required Section 18 810 090 A requires that sarntary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted b� Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adop ed policies of the comprehensrve plan Over-sizin� Section 18 810 090 C states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as pro�ected by the Comprehensive Plan There is an existing CWS trunk sewer to the west of the site ad�acent to Fanno Creek Since Tract A will not be developed, no sewer lateral is needed for that site Therefore, no additional public sewer work is necessary Storm Drainage General Provisions Section 18 810 100 A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff Accommodation of Upstream Drainage Section 18 810100 C states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or oufside the development The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and SurFace Water Management as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendmen�s) Ball Creek flows through Tract A toward Fanno Creek The purpose of creating Tract A is so that Metro can preserve the open space area ad�acent to Ball Creek and Fanno Creek This partition will not negatively impact the two creeks Effect on Downstream Drainage Section 18 810 100 D states that where it is anticipated by the Citx Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing draina�e facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments) Since Tract A will not be developed, there will be no adverse impact to the downstream creek system Therefore, no additional storm dramage measures are needed Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways Bikeway Extension Section 18 810 110 A states that developments ad�oining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way The Ci�r's pedestrian/bikeway plan does not identify any necessary improvements for this segment of SW 74 Avenue A bikeway is planned as part of the Fanno Creek Regional trail Tract A wdl be part of this bikeway segment The applicant has indicated m the impact study that Metro and/or the City of Tigard may in tFie future construct a pathway/bikeway through Tract �4 To ensure that subsequent changes in the property's title will preserve the abdity to construct such a path, a condition should be imposed that requires a blanket pathway easement By imposing this condition, this standard will be met FINDING The application lacks provisions for pathway extensions CONDITION The applicant/owner shall record either a blanket easement allowing a bikeway to be extended through Tract A, or shall coordinate with the City to establish a specific easement for the bikeway NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2002-00007/METRO PARTITION PAGE 12 OF 15 Cost of Construction Section 18 810110 B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use perm�ts, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements Not applicable Minimum Width Section 18 810 110 C states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet Actual construction of the bikeway is premature at this time The final design for the pathway, including width and location is not yet avadable It would be untimely to construct this bikeway, absent any connection to the north or south The partition request is to preserve this area as open space and allow future construction of a pathwaX as other mtervening connecting properties develop or grant easements for the pathway This standard is met Utilities Section 18 810120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be laced above round temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity elec�ric lines opera�ing at�50,000 volts or above, and . The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services • The City reserves the righ{to a prove location of all surface mounted facilities, • All underground utilities, includng sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets, and . Stubs for service connections shall be long enough fo avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement Section 18 810 120 C states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under- rounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing util�ies whicl� are not under round will serve the development and the ap roval authority determines that the cost and �echnical difficulty of under-g rounding the u�IPties outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in con�unction with the deveTopment The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis The most common, but not the only� such situation is a short fronta e develo ment for which under rounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather �han the removal of above-ground utilities facilities An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW 74th Avenue The previous approval for the industrial warehouse building required a payment ofthe fee in-lieu of undergrounding Therefore, no additional assessment is required ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT Publ�c Water S stem o a i iona pu ic water line work is necessary for this partition Storm Water Qualit e i y as agree to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM� regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards adopted by Resolution and Order No 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2002-00007/METRO PARTITION PAGE 13 OF 15 Since Tract A wdl not be developed, no additional water quality measures are needed Gradin and Erosion Control esign an ons ruc ion Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearin�, and any other activity which accelerates erosion Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that wdl disturb five or more acres of land Since this site is not over five acres, the developer will not be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction Since the budding on Parcel #1 has already been completed and no physical land disturbance is proposed for Tracf A at this time, there are no erosion control concems Site Permit Re uired e app ican is required to obtain a Site Permit from the Budding Division to cover all on-site private utility installations (water, sewer, storm, etc ) and driveway construction Since no additional utdities or driveways are required, no site permit wdl be required Address Assi nments e iyo igar is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB) The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB) An addressing fee in the amount of $30 00 per address shall be assessed This fee shall be paid to the City prior to approval of the final plat For this pro�ect, the addressing fee will be $30 00 Surve Re uirements e app ican s ma p a shall contain State Plane Coordinates [NAD 83 (91)] on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positionmg system (GPS) geodetic control network These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of fhe same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north These coordinates can be established by • GPS tie nefinrorked to the City's GPS survey • By random traverse using conventional surveying methods In addition, the app licant's as-budt drawings shall be tied to the GPS nefinrork The applicant's engineer shall provide the City with an electronic file with points for each structure (manholes, catch basins, water valves, hydrants and other water system features in the development, and their respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD 83 (91� SECTION VI OTHER STAFF COMMENTS City of Tigard Forester has reviewed the proposal and mdicates that he is favorable to the proposal The City of Tigard police Department, Water Department, and Public Works Department were all notified of the proposal and did not respond SECTION VII AGENCY COMMENTS Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed the proposal and found no conflicts with their interests Portland General Electric, NW Natural Gas, AT8�T Cable, Verizon, Qwest Communications were ali notified of the proposal and did not respond NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2002-00007/METRO PARTITION PAGE 14 OF 15 SECTION VIII PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice Notice was mailed to X The applicant and owners � Owner of record within the required distance �— Affected government agencies Final Decision THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON SEPTEMBER 20, 2002 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON OCTOBER 5, 2002 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED A��eal The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18 390 040 G 1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18 390 040 G 2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the IVotice of Decision was mailed The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223 Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitEed by any party during the appeal hearing, sub�ect to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5 00 PM ON OCTOBER 4, 2002 Questions If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171 � September 20, 2002 PREPARE BY Morgan racy DATE Associate Planner � ��'�`��'`'' September 20, 2002 APPROVED BY Richard Be ersdorFf DATE Planning Manager i\curpinUnorgan\workspaceUnlpUnlp2002 00007(metro)UnIp2002 00007 deasion doc NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2002-00007/METRO PARTITION PAGE 15 OF 15 nin u �, � � 'P,�, . � ''o 'y � � GEOGFAPX CI F00.4�T O BYSTEM Z�� 2 �, YICINITY MAP � -� — � �`'� M LP2001-00001 � R -� � WY 'C� � � � � � � � � � �� METRO PARTITION � BONITA RD VIA � � v �s F�RF RD � R"� m FE�` N � ~9 C G��y a Q 9 1 h D ��m� �' > - � � � �� 9lIL dflR aP �p J � �� y��pEIN`R� �JH/+N f _�-� , / mTg rd/4ea Map � CARDINAL LN N 0 200 400 60U Feet N 7 a04 teet OG a � � O 2 � City of T�gard 0� REDWOOD LN Infortnahon an Ihis map is for general loca4on ony and should be venfied Nnth fhe Development Servicee Drvision 13125 SW Hell Blvd L� ^ Tigard OR 97223 / \ http/SM.wwc3t9'�'orus Community Development Plot date Jul 30 2002 C�magicWIAGIC03 APR � � o� 0 y s 0 � � � � N n � ��D — � � 20 FOOT£AS£M£NT FOR � CONS7RUCAON OF AN � O ' OVERFLOW LK/ANNEL AS PER DOCUM£NT NO 89-01B56 � I S00 t75 5B tl{'{�.384 08� � I r 4725 °o �1 � - - - - - - - - - - - -_- -_—_—_—_—_—_- - - - JOFOOTS£WER �y I — — — — — — — �N EASEM£NT AS PER BOOK — @61 PAC£686 �fl _ i 5 OObS 59 W 258 JO I� � I I^ EAS£MENT FOR CONSIRUCIION OF AN V£RFLOW CHANN£L AS � PER DOCUMENT NO I 4�z5 B9-01B56 � N OOt75 SB E 90 00 v � � A � ^ � � z 3 , ^ PARCEL 1 � a � 9B!B3 Sf q O � ti PARCEL 2 � �` A 77289 SF 1n F a O� i N a � Ol q � �' � (� OOCUMfN!NO 9g-IJ8570 ' I � r I t7p � N aa�' Q o I �. o I � � N , �� a � � ' `� N90'�0 00"W �� o .� � � S 02b9 00" E 255 66 �� N021'J9 OO�W 201 06 � I 0 — � ---- _� -- Z --- - - - -Syy 74T" AVENUE � � - - - � �X�z��°� � Metro Parks & Greenspaces Department Attn April Olbrich, Legal Assistant MLP2002-00007 600 NE Grand Avenue METRO PARTITIONS Portland, OR 97232-2736 FANNO CREEK ACRES LLC 26262 S MERIDIAN RD AURORA OR, 97002 1 � AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CRYOFiIOARD �ommuntty�DeveCopment SF+apingA BetterCommuraty I, �atnc�a G Gunsford, bemg first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a SenzorAclmrnzrtrat�ve SpecucCut for the �aty of 7'tgard, �lNashmgton County, Oregon and that I served the following {Checic Appropnate Bax(s)Below} 0 NOflCE 0F DECISION FOR MLP2002 00001/METRO PARTITION O AMENDED NOTICE (File No Mame Reference) � City of Tigard Plannmg Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked EXhlblt"A",and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked EXhlblt'B",and by reference made a part hereof, on September 20,2002,and deposited in the United States Mail on SCptC111bC1'20,2002, postage prepaid D�G� (Person that P epared Notic S7A�E O�F'01�,EGON ) ��f�tiv�r�� SS o ard ' Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the�day of , 2002 OFFICIAL SEAL � DIANE Ni JELDERKS ., ' PIOTARY PUBLIC-0REGON MYCOMMI�SS ON�r F�S3�p��7 2003 MY Commission res U �a � � �'� NOTICE OF TYPE II DECiSION MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2002-00007 CITYOFTIGARD METRO PARTITION Commun:ty�DeveCopment Sha �7 BetterCommum 120 DAYS =11/28/2002 SECTION I APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME METRO PARTITION CASE NO Minor Land Partition (MLP) MLP2002-00007 PROPOSAL The applicant is requesting a Minor Land Partition to partition one (1) existing 175,547 square foot lot into finro (2) parcels One parcel is developed with an industrial building complex The other parcel will be an open space tract APPLICANT Metro Parks and Greenspaces OWNER Fanno Creek Acres, LLC 600 NE Grand Avenue P O Box 159 Portland, OR 97232-2736 Aurora, OR 97002 ZONING DESIGNATION I-P Industrial Park District The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commeraai uses, e g , restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e g , noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly LOCATION 14865 SW 74�' Avenue, WCTM 2S112AC Tax Lot, 01200 PROPOSED PARCEL 1 100,624 square feet PROPOSED TRACT A 74,923 square Feet APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA Community Development Code Chapters 18 390 (Decision-Making Procedures), 18 420 (Land Partitions), 18 530 (Industrial Zoning Districts), 18 705 (Access Egress and Circulation), 18 715 (Density Computations), 18 745 (Landscaping and Screening), 18 765 (Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements), 18 775 (Sensitive Lands), 18 790 (Tree Removal), 18 795 (Visual Clearance Areas), and 18 810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards) SECTION II DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for finrenty-five cents (25�) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request SECTION III PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice oT�ti e mailed to X The applicant and owners —� Owner of record within the required distance �— Affected government agencies Final Deci�ion THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON SEPTEMBER 20, 2002 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON OCTOBER 5, 2002 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED A eal e irector's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adverselX affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18 390 040 G 1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18 390 040 G 2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Fiall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223 Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, sub�ect to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5 00 PM ON OCTOBER 4, 2002 Questions oF r�urf�er information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Morqan Tracv at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223 a7� �, [r� � � y� � YICINITY MAP I �' -------- � 4 � -------- � ,� �, MLP2002 00001 � METRO PARTITION n� 1 BONITq RD LJ p Z AY O � yl � � � 'I � l • CAROINAL lN ry � � � Cry fTgeN DW D LN d..�a � � 3 `� I F n9� , @�� '��a�sa �°�{E a g � p�$ IDLSfM OL9S6D5 P � � a�w I �ie N g ��I�—� g � � ryp � � C gp 2 I= � � P� � � � �� I Q .. --�_ � _— _ I I � _ — __ � � � I II � $ I I � I� � II � i � � I � � � P � �$ � i �� i i � � � N I � �R A � W �, � �B �g Y $ 8�y� I I a ad � Yba � � a ° I y��Q I I '�6 I I I R�� I I II f6[OY M 116169 S � (ITl( OF TIGAR� � MLP2002 00007 8�P� N METRO PARTITION Ma Is not to eeale � ��z��`�� zs i i zAC-o2aoo zs»znc-0zsoo ALPHA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP EMPIRE BATTERIES INC 14725 SW 72ND PO BOX 23962 TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97281 2S 112AC-0os00 2S 112AC-07 200 BHK PROPERTIES LLC FANNO CREEK ACRES LLC 11555 SW MYSOLONY 26262 S MERIDIAN RD TUALATIN OR 97062 AURORA OR 97002 2 112AC-0o7o 2S 112AG0200o BH RTIES LLC GEGA JOHN M 8� 115 YSOLONY GEGA JOHN M 8 T ALATIN 97062 ELIZABETH M 1217 NW 25TH PORTLAND OR 97210 2 12AC-ooeoo 2S��zac-oosoo BHK OP TIES LLC HORNEL INC LLC 1155 MYSOLONY BY GALE NELSON T LATIN R 97062 PO BOX 159 AURORA OR 97002 2S112BD-00100 2S112D6-00500 BOROS STEFAN A&FIVIA HUBBARD VIOLA I PO BOX 1890 Go INTERSTATE DEVELOPMENT LLC GRESHAM OR 97030 15065 SW 74TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97224 zS 1 t 2AC-o23o0 2S t 12aC-ot 700 C 8 C DEVELOPMENT INTERSTATE DEVELOPMENT LLC BY DELTA FIRE INC 15065 SW 74TH AVE PO BOX 4010 PORTLAND OR 97224 TUALATIN OR 97062 2S112BD-00200 2S1128D-00400 CASTLEBERRY ALBERT G 8� MALO ROBERT WNIOLET MAY ROBERTA A c/o CORNUTT ENTERPRISES LLC 14760 SW 76TH AVE 11720 SW LYNN TiGARD OR 97224 T�GARD OR 97223 2S112AG-02100 2 112BD-00500 CHAMBERLAIN-HUSSA PROPERTIES ROB WNIOLET MAY 18755 SW TETON Go CO ENTERPRISES LLC TUALATIN OR 97062 117 SW NN ARD OR 7223 2S112BD-0O600 2S112AC-00400 CORNUTT ENTERPRISES LLC NATIONAL SAFETY CO 11720 SW LYNN BY HARRINGTON IND PLASTICS TIGARD OR 97223 14480 YORBA CHINO CA 91710 2 712BD-00 2S712AC-00200 CO NTERPRISES LLC NATIONAL SAFETY CO 117 LYNN 17010 SW WEIR RD T ARD O 97223 BEAVERTON OR 97007 , ,. � 2S712AC-00500 2 2AC-0OS 1 NATIONAL SAFETY CO INC TIGA OF 17010 SW WEIR RD 1312 LL BEAVERTON OR 97007 T ARD OR 97223 2S112AC-02500 2S 2AC-01601 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES TIGA OF ATTN M CONZATTI 1312 HALL 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY STE 300 T ARD O 97223 PORTLAND OR 97224 2S t t 2AC-01100 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300 WMI PORTLAND OR 97224 S t t 2AC-01500 PA IC LTY ASSOCIATES 1535 EQUOIA PKWY#300-WMI P TLAND 97224 2S112DB-00401 PA LTY ASSOCIATES 153 UOIA PKWY�i300 WMI RTLAND OR 97224 2S112BD-00700 PYOUNG PARK& RIELLY BRENDA B REVOCABLE LIVING T 7524 SW ELMWOOD TIGARD OR 97223 2S112AC-0130o RIVAS ERNEST AND ROSE 14905 SW 74TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97224 2s��za,C-0�soo SKOURTES JOHN&JACKIE 17010 SW WEIR RD BEAVERTON OR 97007 2S 112AC-0t 000 SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION BY UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO 1700 FARNAM ST 10TH FLOOR SOUTH OMAHA NE 68102 2St 12AC-02700 T3 ENTERPRISES LLC PO BOX 23962 TIGARD OR 9728t \ � Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82�d Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78'�Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Tngoboff 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs 7775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 AlexanderCraghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 David Chapman 9840 SW Landau Place Tigard, OR 97223 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Brad Spring 7555 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE �i\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East doc) UPDATED Aprd 18 2002 � F AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITYOFTIGARD Commuraty�DeveCopment SfwjnngA�BetterCommumty I, �atnc�a G Lu�f ord being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a SenrorAdmmutrat�ve SpecraC:st for the ��ty of7'�gard, 4NasFirngton County, Oregon and that I served the following (Check Apqopnate Box(s)Bebw) ❑X NOTICE OF PENDIN6 LAND USE APPLICAflON FOR MLP2002 00001/METRO PARTITION � AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) � City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked F.11lhlblt"A",and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked E1(hlblt"B",and by reference made a part hereof, on 101Y 31,2002.and deposited in the United States Mail on 10 3h1 1,2002,postage prepaid (Person that P pared otice ,s'�'A�o�o�GoN ) ��n�of tivashington )ss 0 7" ar� ,T.� Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the�day of , 2002 OFFICIAL SEAL �, f DIpMIE�I JELDERKS NOTARY PUBLIC OREGON COMMISSION NO 326578 MY COMMISSION EXP�RES SEPT 07 � My Commiss�on�ires � a3 � ` �� ru NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER NOTICE OF PENDIHG LAND USEAPPLICATION � MINOR LAND PARTITION CITYOFTIGARD Commuraty�Development SFiaptng A Better Communt DATE OF NOTICE July 31, 2002 FILE NUMBERS MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2002-00007 MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2002-00008 FILE NAME METRO PARTITIONS PROPOSAL The applicant is requesting two (2) Minor Land Partitions to partition two (2) existing contiguous lots into four (4) parcels to create two (2) open space tracts for the purpose of connecting the Fanno Creek Greenway Regional Trad Corridor and to protect and enhance the associated riparian and uplands areas of Fanno and Ball Creeks An existing industrial bwlding wdl remain on one of the parcels, and the remaining parcel has an approved, but not yet constructed, office-warehouse development ZONE I-P Industrial Park District The I-P zoning district provides appropnate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e g , restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e g , noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA Community Development Code Chapters 18 390, 18 420, 18 530, 18 705, 18 715, 18 745, 18 765, 18 790, 18 795 and 18 810 LOCATION 14775 and 14865 SW 74th Avenue, WCTM 2S112AC, Tax Lots 1200 and 900 YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit wntten comments on the application to the City THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5 00 PM ON AUGUST 14. 2002 All comments should be directed to Morgan Tracy. Associate Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223 You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171 ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5 00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR SEPTEMBER 13. 2002 IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION . Address the specific "Applicaole Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal, . Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response, . Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence AFTER THE 14-DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION THE DIRECTOR�S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REGlUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS . The application is accepted by the City . Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14- day written comment period . The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies . City Staff issues a written decision . Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site, all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll, any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site, and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $ 25 per page or the current rate charged for this service Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments " ;� �. ' � "' YICINITY MAP � �, � �, "� MLP2002 00001 `� MLP2002 00008 � �' METRO PARTITIONS I BONITA RD � � Z I 6 r �' g O J I D l � D< I T CAR�INAL LN N I � � � �ry� � sr.r�o�..e�+ � sww I _ _— ___ —�— — m.�w . ( , _ _ 2S112AC-02400 2S112AC-02600 �y/��r �r�, � ALPHA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP EMPIRE BATTERIES INC 14725 SW 72ND PO BOX 23962 TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97281 2S 112AC-0O600 2S 112AC-01200 BHK PROPERTIES LLC FANNO CREEK ACRES LLC 11555 SW MYSOLONY 26262 S MERIDIAN RD TUALATIN OR 97062 AURORA OR 97002 2 1 t 2AC-0o7o 2S t t 2AC o2000 BH RTIES LLC GEGA JOHN M 8� 115 YSOLONY GEGA JOHN M& T ALATIN 97062 ELIZABETH M 1217 NW 25TH PORTLAND OR 97210 2 i2a�oosoo 2s��2n�oosoo BHK OP TIES LLC HORNEL INC LLC 1155 MYSOLONY BY GALE NELSON T LATIN R 97062 PO BOX 159 AURORA OR 97002 2S1126D-00100 2S112D6-00500 BOROS STEFAN A 8 FIVIA HUBBARD VIOLA 1 PO BOX 1890 Go INTERSTATE DEVELOPMENT LLC GRESHAM OR 97030 15065 SW 74TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97224 2S112AC-02300 2S712AC-01700 C 8 C DEVELOPMENT INTERSTATE DEVELOPMENT LLC BY DELTA FIRE INC 15065 SW 74TH AVE PO BOX 4010 PORTLAND OR 97224 TUALATIN OR 97062 2S1126D-00200 2S1128D-00400 CASTLEBERRY ALBERT G 8 MALO ROBERT WNIOLET MAY ROBERTA A c/o CORNUTT ENTERPRISES LLC 14760 SW 76TH AVE 11720 SW LYNN TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 2S712AC-02100 2 112BD-00500 CHAMBERLAIN HUSSA PROPERTIES ROB WNIOLET MAY 18755 SW TETON Go CO ENTERPRISES LLC TUALATIN OR 97062 117 SW NN ARD OR 7223 2S712BD 00600 2S112AC-00400 CORNUTT ENTERPRISES LLC NATIONAL SAFETY CO 11720 SW LYNN BY HARRINGTON IND PLASTICS TIGARD OR 97223 14480 YORBA CHINO CA 91710 2 112BD-0030 2S112AC-00200 CO U NTERPRISES LLC NATIONAL SAFETY CO 117 LYNN 17010 SW WEIR RD T ARD O 97223 BEAVERTON OR 97007 2S112AC-00500` 2 2AC-0OS 7 NATIONAL SAFETY CO INC TIGA OF 17010 SW WEIR RD 1312 ALL BEAVERTON OR 97007 T ARD OR 97223 2S112AC-02500 2S 2AC-01601 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES TIGA OF ATTN M CONZATTI 1312 HALL 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY STE 300 T ARD O 97223 PORTLAND OR 97224 Metro Parks & Greenspaces Dept. Zs�,uc-0„oo Attn April Olbrich, Legal Assistant PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES 600 NE Grand Avenue 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300 WMI Portland, OR 97232-2736 PORTLAND OR 97224 HorNel, Inc. LLC, and s��zc,c-0�eoo Fanno Creek Acres, LLC PA IC LTY ASSOCIATES � �X 159 1535 EQUOIA PK1NY#300-WMI Aurora, OR 97002 P TLAND 97224 2S112DB-00401 PA LTY ASSOCIATES 153 QUOIA PKWY#300-WMI RTLAND OR 97224 2S112BD-00700 PYOUNG PARK& RIELLY BRENDA B REVOCABLE LIVING T 7524 SW ELMWOOD TIGARD OR 97223 2St 12AC-0130o RIVAS ERNEST AND ROSE 14905 SW 74TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97224 zSt12AC-01600 SKOURTES JOHIJ&JACKIE 17010 SW WEIR RD BEAVERTON OR 97007 2S 112AG01000 SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION s BY UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO 1700 FARNAM ST 10TH FLOOR SOUTH OMAHA,NE 68102 2S112AG02700 T3 ENTERPRISES LLC PO BOX 23962 TIGARD OR 97281 r„ Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Dnve, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82�d Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78'�Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Tngoboff 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs 7775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 David Chapman 9840 SW Landau Place Tigard, OR 97223 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Brad Spring 7555 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE �i lcurpin\setup\labels\CIT East doc) UPDATED Apnl 18 2002 . . GEOGRAPH C INFORM�TION SVSTEM AREA NOTIFIEp BONITA RD (500') mmeooeoe mvaamoo � am�eoomo mvr000w� mnuomoo ——————————— ,�.W�, -}'� FOR April C tcwearmo 3� "�"w�°' �� ' RE 2S I I 2AC, 900, I�00 0 o ,��,� ___________ TtIRBG00B00 7t1170CCW00 muewmoo Property owner�nformat�on �s val�d for 3 months from the date pr�nted on th�s map tt,cuo muuo�mo mnauonoo mcao�o �oa muuamo D meneamoo � muewwuo m :m�eo�sou ��a�� :�mncouoa 7t�QB00W00 C � N �o,�o 0 100 200 300 400 Feet 1–273 feel mvoeoasoo muomam (n OG � �" � m C�ty of T�gard � � Informetion on this map is for generel localion ony and O � should be venfietl v+ith the Development Services Dmsion 13725 SW Hall Blvd Tigard OR 97223 � (503)639-4171 http llww.v a tigard or us Commurnty Development Plot date Jun 27 2002 C MagicWIAGIC03 APR " Sy \ 2S112AC-02400 2$112AC-02600 ALPHA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP EMPIRE BATTERIES INC 14725 SW 72ND PO BOX 23962 TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97281 2Si i za,C-0osoo zsi�za,C-0i zoo BHK PROPERTIES LLC FANNO CREEK ACRES LLC 11555 SW MYSOLONY 26262 S MERIDIAN RD TUALATIN OR 97062 AURORA OR 97002 2 112AC-0o7o 2S112AG0200o BH RTIES LLC GEGA JOHN M 8 115 YSOLONY GEGA JOHN M 8 T ALATIN 97062 ELIZABETH M 1217 NW 25TH PORTLAND OR 97210 2 �za�C-ooeoo zsiiza,c-oosoo BHK OP TIES LLC HORNEL INC LLC 1155 MYSOLONY BY GALE NELSON T LATIN R 97062 PO BOX 159 AURORA OR 97002 2S112BD-00100 2S172DB-00500 BOROS STEFAN A&FIVIA HUBBARD VIOLA I PO BOX 1890 Go INTERSTATE DEVELOPMENT LLC GRESHAM OR 97030 15065 SW 74TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97224 2S112AC-02300 2S112AC-01700 C&C DEVELOPMENT INTERSTATE DEVELOPMENT LLC BY DELTA FIRE INC 15065 SW 74TH AVE PO BOX 4010 PORTLAND OR 97224 TUALATIN OR 97062 2S 112BD-00200 2S 112BD-00400 CASTLEBERRY ALBERT G& MALO ROBERT WNIOLET MAY ROBERTA A c/o CORNUTT ENTERPRISES LLC 14760 SW 76TH AVE 11720 SW LYNN TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 2S172AC-02100 2 112BD 00500 CHAMBERLAIN HUSSA PROPERTIES MA ROB WNIOLET MAY 18755 SW TETON c/o CO TT ENTERPRISES LLC TUALATIN OR 97062 117 SW NN ARD OR 7223 2S112BD-0O600 2S112AC 00400 CORNUTT ENTERPRISES LLC NATIONAL SAFETY CO 11720 SW LYNN BY HARRINGTON IND PLASTICS TIGARD OR 97223 14480 YORBA CHINO CA 91710 2 112BD-0030 2S112AC-00200 CO U NTERPRISES LLC NATIONAL SAFETY CO 117 LYNN 17010 SW WEIR RD T ARD O 97223 BEAVERTON OR 97007 � 2s��a.�c-0o5oo 2 za,c-oo � ` NATIONAL SAFETY CO INC TIGA OF 17010 SW WEIR RD 1312 ALL BEAVERTON OR 97007 T ARD OR 97223 2S177AC-02500 2S 9AC-01601 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES TIGA OF ATTN M CONZATTI 1312 HALL 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY STE 300 T ARD O 97223 PORTLAND OR 97224 2S�i 2AC-0�i o0 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300 WMI PORTLAND OR 97224 S 112AC-0150o PA IC LTY ASSOCIATES 1535 EQUOIA PKWY#300 WMI P TLAND 97224 2S112DB-00401 PA LTY ASSOCIATES 153 QUOIA PKWY#300 WMI RTLAND OR 97224 2S712BD-00700 PYOUNG PARK& RIELLY BRENDA B REVOCABLE LIVING T 7524 SW ELMWOOD TIGARD OR 97223 2S112AC-01300 RIVAS ERNEST AND ROSE 14905 SW 74TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97224 2S112AC-01600 SKOURTES JOHN&JACKIE 17010 SW WEIR RD BEAVERTON OR 97007 2S112AG01000 SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION BY UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO 1700 FARNAM ST 10TH FLOOR SOUTH OMAHA NE 68102 zs�i 2,aC-027oo T3 ENTERPRISES LLC PO BOX 23962 TIGARD OR 97281 . , Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82�d Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78�Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Tngoboff 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs 7775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 David Chapman 9840 SW Landau Place Tigard, OR 97223 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Brad Spnng 7555 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE �i\curpin\setup\labeis\CIT East doc) UPDATED Aprd 18, 2002 � ' i 1 - . CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION cmoFncaan I 3 I 25 SVII HALL BOULEVARD S ommuntty�De�weCopment prngA BetterCommuruty TIGARD, OREGON 97223 PNONE 503 639-4111 FAIC 503 684-1241(AtuL Patry or Shuley/Plamm�� ' I I ' II II ' ' I ' ' I ' � (�' Property owner information is valid for 3 months from the date of your request INDICATE ALL PROJECT MAP & TAX LOT NUMBERS (e IS134A6,Tax Lot 00100) OR TNE DDRESSES FOR ALL PROJECT PARCELS BE OW and IN�LUDE A MAP OF ALL LOTS FOR THE PROJECT (preferably assessor's tax map) � <o� �l� /z/-1-c- 2S I U� ° l ✓�—� Z S l INDICATE WHETHER YOU ARE REQUESTINC��OR 3 SETS OF LABELS (NOTE A mmimum o(2 sets of labels wdl be pronded to place on your 2 sets of envelopes that applicants are required to submrt at the time of application submittal I(a neighborhood meeung is required and you hare not yet held that meetmg,you should request 3 sets) NAME OF CONTACT PERSON � PHONE c� 3 '�� This request may be mailed, faxed, or hand delivered to the �ity of Tigard Please allow a 1-day minimum for processing request� Upon completion of your request, the contact person will be called to pick up their request in "Will Call" by their last name, at the �ommunity Development Reception Desk The cost of processing your request must be paid at the time of pick up, as exact cost can not be pre-determined PLEASE NOTE FOR REASONS OF ACCURACY� ONLY ORIGINAL MAILING LABELS PROVIDED BY THE CITY VS RE-TYPED MAILING LABELS WILL BE ACCEPTED Cost Descnption $)I to generate the madmg list, plus $2 per sheet for pnntmg the list onto labels(20 addresses per sheet) Then, multiply the cost to pnnt one set of labels by the number oi sets requested *EXAMPLE* * *- COST FOR THIS REQUEST * * 4 sheet�o(labels x$2/sheet = 8 00 x 1 sets = �I6 00 � sheet(s)of labels x E2/sheet = �T x� sets = � Z sheets o(labels x S2/sheet for fIT area x 2 sets = S 4 00 �� sheet(s)of labels z S2/sheet for CIT area = �x� sets = � GENERATE UST = Sl(�QQ �� GENERATE LIA = E TOTAL = 53100 � TOTAL = � �� . -� �� LAND PARTITIDN ��,�, TYPE II APPLICATION �7 � CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hal!Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4971 FAX.� (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP. HELD WITH: Morgan Tracy ��(�� DATE OF PRE-APP.: ��na i n� � S41 74th Avenue Property Address/Location(s): Ti gard, OR 97223 FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tax Map &Tax Lot#{s): 2S1 12AC 01200 Case No.(s): �LPC��C� ' �� Other Case No.(s): �-'-�° Site Size: 4.03 acres Receipt No.: � '� � :7 — � Metro Parks & Greenspaces Dept. Application Acc�pted By- , App{icant"`: '` �� 600 NE Grand Date:_�Q�� Address: City/State: Portl and, OR Z;P: 97232 Date Determined Complete: Primary Contact: A p r i 1 O1 br i c h, L e qa 1 A S s t�. "!°+�z~�--e�� Rev.8/21l2001 i:lcurpinlmastersVevisedUandpart.doc Phone:503-797-1548 F�X: �3-797-1792 _ � Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)': (Attach list if more than o�e) Fanno Creek Acres, LLC REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS (Note: applications will not be accepted Address: P.O. Box 159 Phone�a03-678-1878 withoutthe requi�ed submittal elements) City/State: Aurora, OR ZiP; 97002 [v� Application Form *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant �"; Owner's Signature/Written Authorization must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written �� Title Transfer Instrument or Deed authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner with written J authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space 0� Copy of Pre-Application Conf. Notes provided on the back of this form or submit a w�itten authorization with � Site/Plot Plan this application. (#of copies based on pre-app check lis PROPOSAL SUMMARY ��Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/z'x 11 �o' ApplicanYs Statement The owners of record of the subject property request permission to of coPies based on Pre-app cneck�is � allow a Land Pa�tition to: � � C S Service Provider Lette��C �� divide 175,546.80 sq ft into tvao � � 2 Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped (total area) (#of parcels) #10 Envelopes & Copy of 500' Property containing 100,623.5 sq ftand 74,923.2 sq ft Owner List Generated by the City (sq. ft. or acres) (sq. ft. or acres) � The partition proposal is to divide a 4.03 acre parcel L� FilingFee (City) $ 780.00 ro i e any additional informa6on here) (Urban) $2,480.00 into 2 parcelsP �� a ?_.31 acre parcel which Fanno Creek Acres retains, on which an office-warehouse building is located; 2) a 1.72 acre parcel through which Fanno & Ball Creeks flow, which P�etro will purchase for protection and enhancement. � 4r List any VARIANCE OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application None APPLICANTS To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements" box (Detailed Submittal Reqwrement Information sheets can be obtained upon request for all types of Land Use Applications ) THE APPLICANT(S)SHALL CERTIFY THAT ♦ The above �equest does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed uaon the subiect propertv ♦ If the application is granted the applicant wdl exerase the rights granted in accordance with the terms and sub�ect to all the conditions and limitations of the approval ♦ All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan attachments and exhibits transmitted herewith are true and the applicants so acknowledge that any pennit issued based on this application may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false ♦ The applicant has read the entire contents of the application including the policies and criteria and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application SIGNATURES of each owner of the sub�ect property DATED this �-7 day of 5�� , 20 � 2 / ,�� Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 I CITY OF TIGARD Communtty�DeveCopment � S6iapmg A�Better Commumty LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 120 DAYS = 11/28/2002 FILE NO MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2002-00007 FILE TITLE METRO PARTITION APPLICANT Metro Parks and Greenspaces Dept OWNER HorNel, Inc LLC, and Attn Aprtl Olbrich, Legal Assistanf Fanno Creek Acres, LLC 600 NE Grand Avenue PO Box 159 Portland, OR 97232-2736 Aurora, OR 97002 REQUEST The applicant is requesting Minor Land Partition approval to partition a 4 02 acre parcel into two parcels consisting of 2 25 and 1 77 acres respectively The proposed 2 25 acre parcel is currently developed with an office and warehouse budding that will remain The proposed 1 77 acre parcel will be reserved as an open space tract for the purpose of connecting the Fanno Creek Greenway Regional Trail Corridor and to profect and enhance the associated riparian and uplands areas of Fanno and Ball Creeks I y86y LOCATION 1� 74�' Avenue, WCTM 2S112AC, Tax Lot 1200 ZONE I-P Industrial Park District The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combmin light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e g , restauran�s, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e g , noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments wdl be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters 18 390, 18 420, 18 530, 18 705, 18 715, CRITERIA 18 745, 18 765, 18 790, 18 795 and 18 810 CIT AREA East CIT FACILITATOR List Avadable Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY BELOW ❑ TYPE I � TYPE II ❑ TYPE III ❑ TYPE IV DATE COMMENTS WERE SENT JULY 31, 2002 DATE COMMENTS ARE DUE AUGUST 14,2002 ❑HEARINGS OFFICER [MONJ DATE OF HEARING TIME 100 PM ❑PLANNING COMMISSION [MONJ DATE OF HEARING TIME 7 00 PM ❑CITY COUNCIL [TUESJ DATE OF HEARING TIME 730PM �STAFF DECISION [TENTAflII� DATE OF DECISION SEPTEMBER 13. 2002 COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION � VICINITY MAP ❑ HYDRAULIC CALCS ❑ ARBORIST REPORT � SITE PLAN ❑ UTILITY PLAN ❑ IMPACT STUDY � NARRATIVE ❑ GRADING PLANS � OTHER STAFF CONTACT Morgan Tracy, Assistant Planner (503� 639-4171, Ext 2428 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON July 31, 2002 Metro Parks and Greenspaces Department Attn: April Olbrich 600 NE Grand Portland, OR 97232 RE: Notice of Complete Application Submittal— MLP2002-00007 Dear Ms. Olbrich: The City has received the information necessary to begin the review of your Minor Land Partition application. Staff has, therefore, deemed your application submittal as complete and will begin the review process. The estimated time for rendering a decision from the date an application is deemed complete is 5-6 weeks. If you have any questions regarding your application, please don't hesitate to contact me at (503) 639-4171 ext. 2428. Sincerely, � � �� Morgan Tracy Associate Planner i:\curpinlmorganlworkspacelmlpUnlp2002-00007(metro)Vnlp 2002-00007 letter of completeness.doc c: MLP 2002-00007 Land Use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503)639-4171 TDD(503)684-2772 LAHD USE APPLIC�rION Project:_ P�o2 - �� Date:_'1/l66/0 2 C4MPLETENESS REVIEIN ❑ COMPLETE ❑ INCOMPLETE STI�IDARD INFORMATION: [�i Deed/Title/Proof Of Ownersh+p ❑1�1��leighborhood Mtg. Affidavits, Minutes, list Of Attendees 0 Impact Study(18.390} Q USA Service Provider tetter ❑p/RConstruction �ost Estimate ❑ # Sets Of Application Materials/Plans Q Pre-Application fonference Notes [� Envelopes With Postage (Verify C�unt) PROJECT STATISTICS: ❑ Building Footprint Size Q� %Of Landscaping On Site ❑ %O(Building Impervious Surface On Site (�� Lot Square Footage L N NSIONED: Building footpriot []� �arking Space Dimensions(Indude Accessible b Bike Parkin� ❑—/ Truck loading Space Where Applicable ❑ Building Height [}l Access Approach And Aisle [r1 Yisual Clearance Triangle Shown ADDITIONAL PLANS: ❑ Yicinity Map ❑ Architectural Plan ❑ Tree Inventory [� Existing Conditions Plan ❑ landscape Plan [� '� ( � .(-� ( Site Plan rt �M � � �� P �� [� ❑ Lighting Plan R E LAN/MITIGA ION PLAN: I�t ❑ O O ADDITIONAL REPORTS: (list any special repons) ❑ ❑ a o 0 0 RESPONSE TO APPLICABLE CODE SECTIONS: ❑ I 8.330�c�e�o�u�� ❑ 18.620�r�a r��n��so�a,� [� 18J65 ron-SaK�e��aing kquiremenn) ❑ I 8.340(u��:w�c«�aeo�) ❑ 18.630(wuhi��sq��gio��c�c� [t]� 18.I15�o,rc�� ❑ I H.3SO(Pl�nned Developmen� Q� 18.105(Acass/Egress�araboon) ❑ 18.780(zgns► ❑ I 8.360�ce oe�e�op�knt k�e�r) ❑ I 8.110(Accessory Aesidenu�unitc) ❑ I 8.185�r«�«�u�v�:�� ❑ I8.370 n��e;�� ❑ I8J I 5��h c��be�� ❑ I8.79a�r�� ❑ I 8.380��8 n�R�c��a��a� ❑ I 8J20��c«��tie��h sa�a�� I 8.795�r��a�a�� ❑ I 8.385�n��a�r�� I H.JIS(Emmm�menGl Perbmuna Sonduds) ❑ 18.791�r�o��o��r a�a�� [� I 8.390�oawo�h�g�d��/�pm swey) � ❑ I 8.730�Ex«�o�ro u��c s�� t 8.198�r,�c�,.��u�F�uo�� d❑ I 8.4 I 0(mc��d�soM�a► ❑ I 8.140�oa;�o�� I 8.810�uK��ueiq a��sr�a�� I BAZO(l�nd Pu000ns) o �$.�4�,��P��,��, . ❑ I 8.430(wedinsans) ❑ I 8.745(undx�ping d Saeening Swduds) �'N9�oW�YI r�.y �o,�/��(�,�(, , ❑ I H.S I O(Msideawl Ionin`Distriar} ❑ I 8.7SO(Mmu(xwred/Mobil Nane kgulioons) ❑ I E.SZO(famiera�l Zming Districu) ❑ I 8.155�nixed Sofid Wuh/kq+dng Stange) [� I 8.530�na�a��,g o�o�;a�� ❑ I 8.160(�o��o��q s�ouoo�) AQDITIONAL ITEMS: 1:lcurpinlmasterskevisedUand use applica6on completeness review.dot REVISED: 17-Jan-01 M ' , '� Exhi bi t #1 ��cFOneood � �otnr.r+►noeo� � .� � � ee- r�ue o�No ,� �.,.� °o��r mem and r11y 1Nst Px�ow Na q�l�tor ��4 �sbed � � � � ' � � MarR.oa�Ra+u�Te� � r� ��y� � } �T � FaAGO C1COli L-C ? c? ° �' � 26262 S Mcndisn Rd � OR 97002 4 a�„��actor o1 x.m nd�s0. UPn E:- �1141f ddotaa�1 he ram 14.W1no� ark {Jylla�au�vp� � F�� y�,C poc 9913A5ta 36 00 �6T61S Meodianitd Rett 245981 12/22/1999 09 38 2Gam O 1Uw OA97d02 xmaaA��7.lP V..1 $ STAT�'COIIX BARGAII�AND SAL�DEED iQl}I Daelopm�LL��n°o�V��°��as�mm�Couu�Y��to•�a w F�AO C�3c Awa�1.LC Oo�,t�e foDaovlo8� haeo[ 8�Pstubt°A�bs�o aad b!nfael�mad�°WK �' � a W � � ofotts s9 aw) ' '[fie Imo talle�d0[auaaf�t tLdi oonve�+°ce is 5400. (�e�v19aW�� 3 bone by aaa oiu,e�ane�bo�d ocaudw�wl�h us aoepa�e aeal,da� e�xo�au 1�e nramber�,.�19�9 '1�D6 II�STA1)A�i W�Z N07' A1�AW USB 0� TE�PR�PPRTY D�SC[�� II�I'i�.9 IIISIRUNffi�T�'IId � VIOLA110N OF ApPi1Cl�lLB LA1�ID Ll�1d�WS AND RBGULpi1'IONS BEPDRL SI(�id OR ACCEF7II'1G TFilS n�L477tUt�t�r. TF� PBRSON A� �E TiT1E'f0 7� p��,Y APPRO� AND z'O AFPROPRIA'IE C17Y OR C�IJATI�f PI.AI�B�(i D�AR?'h�N1' T'� � DETggI►�ANY LIIrffI'S Ot�1 l.AWSUrCS AGA�NSC FK1il�fG OR FORBb'I'PRACTiC65 AS D�FQ1�IId aE13 30 930 lWHS Dwelu� 63iAE C,81e1�e1sm Sl'A'i��RSC�N i a coumy�� Ou thlB A��1999 b01b1C b1e ajg+�d GalONelfort BDd ��moR[ dd�y�bst LNs1w.�e�►d Gele Ncleoa��e P�dm►t.sud bcls�, thc wnhln a�ed caporano��d tbat iLa sud msWmr.�l waa al�ed m b�hs![oP�d c�O�h°a b9�oF ils Boe�d n[D�tatt.�d 0�7sNdma aad x�a�wladS��to be the ftc�act aod do�d oC s�id m�potattoa IN TBSTpdONY�P 1 have besea�n�e!wY�td snd affi�ed m�o�dsl eesl �Le dep��ndy�1a�ab�v°� �� lm� - � .. �o� No�aq Pt�blio fac 1Lo 5t�le of OtegoA , PHUe ea.a� �.�(y mmmuslon acp� lt6-0Z qOT4R'I�EOOM COYYISSIOIIMO 9780W 1R COYp16510N E7IPIRE6 L1fL 6,20QZ �YOID R MQFlG��61E�9 M A�AIfOG�iDII �E 0 I�IW 41E tNJnaR�SUFFItlfl�R ON f11ST OF fY1�04�ML app�gga � �� 3 �-- � � i6 . ' � � � ' � �Xhibit "A° N � �'�' earoel l: t� Being a tragt'of land as per pocum�nt No 89-79868 whlch is also In a port�on o�Lot 20� T '�anno CFeek Aue Tracts", situated m the NE Quarter of Section 12►Township 2 South�Range 1 West�VVIAamette Meridlan.City of Tigard,Washington County,State oF Oregon� being more particu[arly descnbed as foUows� � geg�nntng at the north�rest corner of�ot 20,'�anno Creek Acre Tracts".thence along �� the ce�ter saction Ime of said Seatlon 12 and the westerly►l�ne of sald F�I�no Creek �3 Acre i rac�s",�S00°05'58,"VN� a distat�ce of 79 98 feet,thence N90°00'00°E,a d�sta�nce of 452 83 feet to the westerly rtght of way ime of"S.W 74m AYenue (40 feet wide),thence ,C�y�� along said vsr�erly right of way lin� NO2'09'00"W, a distance of 259 53 feet,thence �' S69°57'11°V�, a distance of r442 74 feet to the center sect�on Cne of seid Secdon 12, thenca along.said cente�6ectlon Itne,S00°05'S8"W,s dlstance of 179 00 to tfie Pofnt of � Begirtningr Coniairnng 116,065 square feet,2 68 acres Parcel 2: , �d� Being a tract of land as per pocume�t No 89-19868,which is also in a porhon of Lots � 19 and 20, °Fanno Creek Acre Tra�ts°, sduated in the NE Quarter of Secbo� 12, n �� ,i] , Townshtp 2r�outh,Range 1 West,W+Uamette MeNdran, C�ty of Tigard, Washmgton �j �`� County. State of Oregon�being more patticnlarly descrbed�s follows �,�4 Beg�nning at the southwest comer of lot 19,"Fanno Ctoek aere Tracts',thence aldng the center secUon Une ef sald Sec�on 12 and the westeriy Itne of said"Fanno Greek Aere Tracts', N00°05'58"E. a distance of 256 84 feet to a pofnt 79 98 feet fram the northwest corner of Lot 20, °Fanno Creek Acte Trscts°,thence N90°00'0�"E�a distance of 452 931�eet to the westePly rlght of way l�ne of"S W 74�'Avenue(40 feet wtde) thence aleng sald weaterly nght of way tlne S02°09'00"E,a d�sta�ce of 255 63 feet to � the south line of said Lot 19�thence S89°48'42"W,a distance of 462 97 fee#to the Pou�t of BEgtnning Ccntainmg'117 306 squ�re feet, 2 68 aaes a Exhibit #1 When recorded, ma�l to Metro Office of General Counsel 600 NE Grand Avenue Portland, OR 97232-2736 MEMORANDUM OF PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT Th�s�s a memorandum of a certa�r►Agreement of Purchase and Sale("AgreemenY') between Fanno Creek Acres, LLC, an Oregon l�mited l�abil�ty company("Seller"),and Metro, an Oregon mumc�pal corporation("Metro"),signed by Seller on 2002 By said Agreement, Seller has agreed to sell to Metro Seller's mterest m that certam real property m Wash�ngton County,descnbed in Ex}ubrt A attached hereto and mcorporated herem by th�s reference If not earlier paid, all amounts owed under the Agreement shall be due and payable 180 days after the Effect�ve Date as set forth in the Agreement,�f Closing�s not otherwise extended as prov�ded for therem The actual and true cons�deration for the conveyance at Closmg w�ll be be based upon FNE THOUSAND FNE HLJNDRED DOLLARS ($5,500 00) per acre, with the tota] acreage and total purchase pnce to be determmed by a survey of the Property as set forth�n Pazagraph 5(a)(v)of the Agreement of Purchase and Sale IN WITNESS WHEREOF, ihe parties have caused t}us memorandum to be executed as of the day and year first wntten above SELLER Fanno Creek Acres, LLC,an Oregon l�mited liability company Gale Nelson anaging Member State of Oregon ) ss County of On th�s � �'day of� 2002,before me �a�j , the unders�gned Notary Publ�c,perso ally appeared GALE NELSON, as Managmg Member of FANNO CREEK ACRES, LLC,an Oregon lim�ted l�ability company,personally known to me (or proved to be on the basis of satisfactory ev�dence)to be the person whose name �s subscnbed to th�s�nstrument,and acknowledged that he(she o they)executed it OFFICIAL SEAL DEBORAH WADE y comm�ss�on exp�res 7 ✓� � NOTARy pUBLIC-0REGON MY COMM�SSION EXP R'ES U�y 5 2003 METRO,a mumc�pal corporat�on By M�ke Burton,Executive Officer State of Oregon ) ss County of � ) On th�s �� day of 2002,before me Y� the undersigned Notary Public,person ly appeared MIKE BURTON, as Execuhve Of�icer of Metro,a mumc�pal corporahon,personally known to me(or proved to be on the basis of satisfactory evidence)to be the person whose name�s subscnbed to this�nstrument, and acknowledged that he executed rt V My comm�ssi n exp�res �a—� 3—ZoD� OFFICIAL SEAL V L APRIL OLBRICH N07ARY PUBLIC-OREGON MY COMMISS ON EXPSRES OCT 3 2005 , Exh�b�t A Faiu�o Creek Acres Property Descnpt�on Bemg a port�on of a tract Qf tand per pocumeM No 99138520,which rs aiso in a pottwn of Lots 19 and 20, FANNO CREEK ACI�E TRACTS,srtuated in the Northeast quarter of Se�tion 12,Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Wiliamette Mend�an. m the Gty of'Tk,�ar�d� County of Wastungton at�Siate of Oregon. bemg more parbculariy descnbed as#oqows Beginning at the Southvvest comer of Lot i 9, FANNO CREEK ACRE TRACTS�thet�ce abng the center sect,on line of sa�d Secbon 12 and the Westerty linne o�sa�d FANNO CREEK ACRE TRACTS, North 00°05'S8"East, a distance of 384 08 feef. thence North 89°56'20'East, a distanoe of 3b7 61 fee�thence North 50°03'47"East, a d�stance of 11419 feet to the Westerly right of way tine of S W 74�'Avenue (4U feet wide). thence atong said Westerty nghf of way line South 02°09'00'East, a d�stance of 466 69 feet to the South flne of satd Lot 19� thence Soutfi 89°49'42'West,a d�stance of 462 97 feet to the pant of beglnning , 0 �w � TABLE OF CONTENTS DATA SHEET PROJECT OVERVIEW Pro�ect Descriptton Background M1NOR LAND PARTITION NARRATIVE Applicant's Compliance with the City of Tigard Development Code Standards Chapter 18 390 Dec�sion Making Procedures/impact Study Chapter 18 420 Land Partitions Chapter 18 530 Industrial Zoning Districts Chapter 18 705 Access/Egress/Circulation Chapter 18 765 Parking Chapter 18 775 Sensitive Lands Review Chapter 18 795 Visual Clearance Areas Chapter 18 810 Street & Utility Improvement Standards CONCLUSION APPENDICES Appendix #1 Copy of Pre-App Conference Notes Appendix #2 CWS Service Provider Letter EHXIBITS Exhibrt#1 Vesting Deed and Memo of Purchase Agreement to Metro Exhibrt #2 Vicinrty Map/Proposed Partrtion Map (Aerial Topo) Exh�brt #� Existing Condrtions Map Exhibrt #�Preliminary Plat 1 of 9 } 4 DATA SHEET APPLICANT Metro Parks and Greenspaces Department Open Spaces Division 600 NE Grand Portland, OR 97232 Attn William Eadie Telephone 503-797-1925 Fax 503-797-1588 APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE Metro Office of General Counsel Attn April Olbrich, Legal Asst 600 NE Grand ' Portland, OR 97232 Telephone 503-797-1548 Fax 503-797-1792 PROPERTY OWNER Fanno Creek Acres, LLC C/o Gale Nelson P O Box 159 Aurora, OR 97002 Telephone 503-678-1878 Fax 503-797-1233 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION T2S R1 W, Section 12AC, Tax lot 1200 SITE SIZE 175,472 square feet CURRENT ZONING DESIGNATION I-P (Industrial Park District) PROPOSAL Minor land partition type II application 2 of 9 PROJECT OVERVIEW Pro�ect Descr�ption Fanno Creek Acres, LLC, ("Fanno Creek") the owner, and Metro Parks and Greenspaces Department, ("Metro") buyer, wish to partition the 4 028 acre property ("the Property") into two parcels Fanno Creek retains the 2 25 acre parcel ("the Fanno Creek Parcel") on which an office and warehouse bu�lding is sited Metro obtains a 1 77 acre riparian and uplands parcel ("the Metro Parcel") through which both Fanno Creek and Ball Creeks flow Metro is purchasing the Metro Parcel to 1) close the remaimng"gaps" of the Fanno Creek Greenway Regional 1 rail Corridor and 2) to protect and enhance the associated riparian and uplands areas of Fanno and Ball Creeks This applicat�on is for a minor land partit�on to create the two parcels for the purposes set above and there is no development associated with this request Background The current configuration of the Property, tax lot 1200, 2S 1 W 12AC, was "approved" by City of Tigard (MIS2000-00012) in 2000 and the current office/warehouse building was approved m 1998 (SDR 98-0019) The current square footage of the Property is 175,472 square feet Code Requirements Chapter 18 530 Industrial Zoning Distr�cts The Property is zoned I-P, Industrial Park, which has the purpose of providing appropriate locations for comb�mng light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e g , restaurants, personal serv�ces and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting Only those light industrial uses wrth no off-srte impacts, e g , noise, glarc, odor, vibrations are permitted in the I-P zone The currently existing office-warehouse structure is a permitted outright use, the I-P zone does not prohibrt a"natural area" parcel The standards for the zone and property's compliance with those standards are addressed below Minimum Lot Size None Response Thc parccls crcatcd by this partition will be 1) 98,183 square foot parcel on which the existing Fanno Creek Acres office warehouse structure is srted, and 2) 77,289 square foot parcel which will be purchased by Metro as a Natural Area/Open Space parcel The new parcels will meet the required m�nimum lot size Average Minimum Lot Width 50 feet Response Each of the lots created by this partition will have a mimmum lot width of 50 feet Setbacks The minimum required setbacks are Front yard 35 feet, Side yard 0 feet, Rear yard 50 feet 3 of 9 , Response The Fanno Creek Parcel meets the above listed setbacks The Metro Parcel abuts a res�dential zone which requires a 50 foot setback, but no development is proposed on the Metro Parcel Maximum Buildin�Height 45 feet Response The current structure on the Fanno Creek Parcel meets the maximum butlding height of 45 feet This application proposes no development or Structures on the Metro Parcel Maximum Site Covera�75% Response The existing building and impervious surface parking lot cover approximately 70% of the Fanno Creek Parcel This application proposes no development or structures on the Metro Parcel Mirumum landscaped or natural ve�etation area 25% Response The minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area of the Fanno Creek Parcel is 30% The Metro Parcel will have no structures or development and meets the proposed minimum landscaped or natural vegetation requirements Chapter 18 390 040 Dec�sion Makin� Procedures—Type II Procedures Type II procedures apply to quasi�udicial permits and actions that contain some discretionary criteria Type II actions are decided by the Director wrth public notice and an opportumty for a hearing If any party with standing appeals the Director's Type II decis�on, the appeal of such decision will be heard by the Hearings Officer Response This application ts for a Minor Land Partition, for the creation of two (2) lots from one existing lot Such an application is sub�ect to a Type II decision making procedure in Table 18 390 040 of the City of Ttgard Communrty Development Code Applications are sub�ect to a Type II procedure and decided by the Director w�th public notice and opportunity for a hearing Type II applications are not sub�ect to the Neighborhood Meet�ng requirement (Section 18 390 040) Response This proposal is to partrtion an existing legal lot of record with an area of 175,472 square feet into two lots, 1) a 98,183 square foot parcel, which �ncludes an existing office-warehouse complex, to be retained by Fanno Creek Acres, LLC and 2) a 77,289 square foot riparian and uplands parccl which w�ll be purchased by Metro The Industrial Park zomng has no mimmum lot size, so both of these parcels comply with mimmum lot size, setbacks, maximum lot coverage and minimum landscaping requirements The City of Tigard Community Development Code requires the inclusion of an impact study to quantify the effect of the proposed development on public facilrties Response The partition of a single legal lot of record into two lots will have no impact on the development of publ�c facilrties and services, the existing development on this lot meets the Crty of Tigard requirements The proposed Metro Parcel will require no public 4 of 9 services, since this is an application for a land d�vision, not development of any structure(s) or trail Transportat�on System including Bikewa� The current configuration of the Property contains approx�mately 457 feet of frontage along the SW 74`h Avenue Under the proposed minor partit�on, the Fanno Creek Parcel will maintain approximately 255 feet of frontage along SW 74�h Avenue, and the Metro Parcel approximately 201 feet Right of way has been dedicated and sidewalks, curbs and gutters and stortn sewers constructed Access to the existing Fanno Creek Acres office warehouse building �s through two 30 foot access ways located on SW 74`" Avenue, which will be �ncluded in the Fanno Creek Parcel The Fanno Creek Parcel meets Crty of Tigard code requirements for circulat�on and parking spaces The current paved surface and parking areas were designed to meet city engineering standards No additional public transportation systems will be requ�red as result of this partrtion There is no existing bikeway in this area, although there is a proposed off street regional multi-use path in the greenway area on the recently adopted Tigard Transportation System plan Metro and/or the City of Tigard Parks Department may in the future, wish to construct a pathway/bikeway on the Metro Parcel At such time, Metro and/or the Parks Department will submit its application and plans and meet the City of Tigard's Community Development Code requirements Drainage System The current Fanno Creek Acres office and warehouse structure meets the city's requirements for stormwater systems and includes a water quality facility There is no proposed development on the Metro Parcel, so no additional drainage systems will be required as a result of this partition Metro and/or the City of Tigard Parks Department may in the future, wish to construct a pathway/bikeway on the Metro Parcel At such time, Metro and/or the Parks Department will submtt its appltcation and plans and meet the City of Tigard's Community Development Code requirements Parks System The proposed partition has no impact on the local park system Metro and/or the City of T�gard Parks Department may in the future, wish to construct a pathway/b�keway on the Metro Parcel At such time, Metro and/or the Parks Department will submit its application and plans and meet the Crty of Tigard's Communrty Development Code requirements Water Svstem Thc currcnt Fanno Creek Acres office warehouse building meets the city's requirements for water systems There is no proposed development on the Metro Parcel, so no additional drainage systems will be required as a result of this partition Metro and/or the City of Tigard Parks Department may in the future, wish to construct a pathway/bikeway on the Metro Parcel At such time, Metro and/or the Parks Department 5 of 9 w�ll submit its application and plans and meet the City of Tigard's Commumty Development Code requirements Sewer Svstem The current Fanno Creek Acres office warehouse building meets the city's requirements for sewerage system There is no proposed development on the Metro Parcel, so no additional sewerage systems w�ll be required as a result of this partit�on Metro and/or the City of Tigard Parks Department may in the future, wish to construct a pathway/bikeway on the Metro Parcel At such time, Metro and/or the Parks Department will submrt rts application and plans and meet the Crty of Tigard's Communrty Development Code reqwrements Noise Impact of the Development The proposed partition has no noise impact on surrounding neighbors Metro and/or the City of Tigard Parks Department may �n the future, wish to construct a pathway/bikeway on the Metro Parcel At such time, Metro and/or the Parks Department will submit its application and plans and meet the Crty of Tigard's Communrty Development Code requirements Chapter 18 420 50 Land Partrtions Approval Criteria A request to partition shall meet all of the following criteria 1 The proposed partrtion complies wrth all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations Response The applications and accompanying exh�bits demonstrate compliance with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations Existing improvements are �n compliance 2 There are adequate public fac�lrties available to serve the facilrty, itesponse Public facilities to serve the proposed partition are currently available and are serving the tract The partrtion will not require addrtional facilrties 3 All proposed improvements meet City and applicable agency standards Response There are no proposed improvements Ex�sting improvements are in compliance 4 All proposed lots confirm to the specific requirements below a) The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning district Response The minimum width of the building envelope, 50 foot, is met on both proposed parcels No building or development is proposed on the proposed Metro Parcel b) The lot area shall be as requ�red by the appl�cable zomng district In case of a flag lot, the accessway may not be included in the lot area calculat�ons Response The property ts located in an Industrial Pazk zone, which has no minimum lot size The proposed parcels meet this requirement There is no flag lot 6 of 9 c) Each lot created through the partition process shall front a publ�c r�ght of way by at least 15 feet or have a legally recorded minimum 15 foot wide access Response Both proposed parcels have a min�mum of 15' feet of frontage on SW 74�' Avenue d) Setbacks shall be required by the applicable zomng district Response Both the proposed parcels meet the setback requirements of front yard, 35 feet, side yard, 0 feet, and rear yard, 50 feet The Metro Parcel has no proposed development e) When the partrtioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard, prov�ded that no side yard is less than 10 feet Structures shall generally be located so as to maximize separation from existing structures Response Not applicable Neither of the proposed parcel is a flag lot fl A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved dr�ve in an accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18 745 O50 Screemng may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable outdoor recreat�on areas for proposed development Response I'he paved accessway is approximately 30 feet south of the proposed minor partition line, so no screen is required A landscaping buffer currently exists between the proposed parcel The Metro Parcel is for Natural Area/Open Space and requires no privacy and since no development is proposed, no usable outdoor recreation area is required g) The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway would have a detrimental effect of fire-fighting capabilities Response A fire hydrant is located approximately 13 feet from the proposed property line on SW 74�' Avenue Since there is no proposed development, only a partition of the property, no new or additional services are needed h) Where a common dnve is to be provided to serve more than one lot, a reciprocal easement wh�ch will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded wrth the approved partrtion map Response Both proposed parcels have frontage on SW 74`h Avenue, this requirement does not apply 5 Any accessway shall comply with standards set forth in Chapter 18 705, Access, Egress and Circulation Response Both proposed parcels have frontage on SW 74`h Avenue and the Fanno Creek developed parcel meets the standards of Chapter 18 705 There is no proposed development for the Metro Parcel 6 Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or ad�acent to the one-hundred year floodplain, the Crty shall reqwre consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adJoining and w�thin the floodplain This arca shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway wrt the floodplain in accordance wrth the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan 7of9 Response The purpose of the proposed minor partition is so that Metro can acquire approximately a 1 77 acre tract through which Ball and Fanno Creeks flow to 1) close the remaining gaps of the Fanno Creek Greenway Regional Tra�l Corridor and 2)to protect and enhance the associated riparian and uplands areas of Ball and Fanno Creeks Metro and/or the City of Tigard may manage the property and may develop and build a pathway which meets the City of Tigard code requirements 7 An application for a variance to the standards prescribed in this chapter shall be made in accordance with Chapter 18 370, Variances and Ad�ustments The applications for the partrtion and variance(s)/adJustment(s) will be processed concurrently Response No variance or ad�ustment is requested Chapter 18 705, Access, Egress and C�rculat�on 18 705(I) Minimum access requirements for commercial and �ndustrial use in I-P zone Minimum number of driveways required 1 Minimum access width 30' Mimmum pavement 24' curbs required Response Each of the proposed parcels has a minimum of 50 feet on SW 74`h Avenue, a public street The proposed Fanno Creek Parcel satisfies the Crty of Tigard requirements The Metro Parcel proposes no development, the partition will not effect the existing access Chapter 18 765, Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements 18 765 040, General Standards Response The Fanno Creek Parcel meets all of the City of Tigard requirements for parking spaces, off-street parking and loading requirements The Metro Parcel proposes no development and thus has no parkmg space requirement Chapter 18 775 Sensitive Lands 18 775 20 Applicabilrtv of Uses, Permrtted, Prohibrted and Nonconformin� A Outright permitted uses with no permit requ�red Except as provided subsections B, D and E below, the following uses are outright permitted uses wrth�n the 100-year floodpla�n, drainageways, slopes that are 25% or greater and unstable ground when the uses does not involve paving For the purposes of this chapter, the word "structure" shall exclude children's play equipment, picmc tables, sand boxes, grills, basketball hoops and similar recreational equipment 1 Accessory uses such as lawns, gardens or play areas, 2 Farm uses conducted without locating a structure within the sensitive land area, 3 Community recreation uses, excluding structures, 4 Public and private conservation areas for water, soil, open space, forest and wildltfe resources, 5 Removal of poison oak, tansy ragwort, blackberry or other noxious vegetation, 6 Maintenance of floodway excluding re-channeling, 7 Fences, except in floodway area, 8 Accessory structures which are less than 120 square feet �n size, except in the floodway area, and 9 Land form alterations up to 10 cubic yards of material, except in the floodway area 8 of 9 I2esponse Fanno and Ball Creeks flow through the current configuration of the property The currently existing Fanno Creek Acres office warehouse structure and impervious surfaces are located outside of Sensitive Lands area, a small portion of the northern boundary of the proposed Fanno Creek Parcel is sloped, but no development is proposed on this area The proposed Metro Parcel includes Sensitrve Lands, such as 100 year floodpla�n and dramageways Metro's proposed use of the Metro Parcel as a public conservation area and management regime includes the removal of noxtous and invasive competing vegetation and restoring and enhanc�ng the riparian zones of Ball Creek and Fanno Creek, is an outright permitted use in the Sensitive Lands overlay zone This application proposes no development or structures on the Metro Parcel CWS Buffer Standards Land development ad�acent to Sensitive Areas shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area Response The Fanno Creek Parcel meets this standard The Metro Parcel includes Fanno and Ball Creeks, which are Sensitive Areas, Metro proposes no development of this tract, but is purchasmg the tract for public conservation area for water, soil, open space, forest and wildlife resources, includtng restoration and enhancement of the riparian and uplands habrtat CWS Service Provider Letter is attached as Appendix 2 Code Chapter 18 795, Clear Vision Area The City requires that Clear Vision Areas be maintained between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height at road/driveway, road/railroad and road/road intersections The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area Response The Fanno Creek Parcel meets the standards of a 30' triangle in both directions and 30 feet back from the property line on all other types of uses This application proposes no development or structures on the Metro Parcel Conclusion The proposed partition of tax lot 1200 creates two tracts, 1) a Fanno Creek Parcel on which currently existing office/warehouse building is sited, and 2) a Metro Parcel through which Fanno and Ball Creeks flow and which Metro will restore and enhance the riparian and uplands area Th�s application addresses and demonstrates compliance wrth the relevant sections of the Crty of Tigard Development Code The applicant and owner request approval of the proposed minor land partition as set forth in the application and accompanying documentation \\MRC FILES\FILES\OLDNE7IMETR0210GC\DEPTS�APRIL\TARGETAS\FANNOCRK\fannocrl�acr\narr doc 9 of 9 CITY OF TIGARD PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES ��°��C�� (Pre-Applicat�on Meetmg Notes are Valid for Six (6) Months) sh°��BetterCommumty NON-RESIDENTIAL �,�n�o� 6 N 2 ��,� /l�1T APPLICANT METRD AGENT 1`t'pr�I (�I6r�� Phone f 1 Phone (��)79�-is y� PROPERTY LOCATION ADDRESS/GENERAL LOfATION I`I B�5 5w-�� 1�?�S �W ?��'' TAX MAP(S)/LOT #(S) �5/ /,2 y-�'. /�-00�r� 9G� NECESSARY APPLICATIONS M�� M��orLa...,� �a-�1 D�t oa� PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION Z��wo aru,C c��t��on b �O � � COMPREHENSIVE PLAN L � ` MAP DESIGNATION ��G�r I n�v5tyt�el ZONING MAP DESIGNATION �-� CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAM(C I T)AREA E�s�' ZONIN6 DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENi'S [Refer to Code Secnon 18�' 1 MINIMUM LOT SIZE � sq ft Average Min lot width �t7 ft Max building height �15 ft Setbacks. Front�ft Side �2 ft Rear�ft Corner ft from street MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE ��% Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area�% ❑ NEI6HBORNOOD MEE11N6 [Refer to tl�e Neignbor600d Meedng Bandoutl THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S), AND THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION of their proposal A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mading date and the meeting date is required Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice Meeting is to be held prior to submitting vour application or the application will not be accepted * NOTE In order to also preliminanly address bwlding code standards, a meeting with a Plans Examiner�s encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application CIN OF TIGARD Pre-Applicahon Conference Notes Page 1 of 9 NON-Residenhal AppluzhoNPlannmg Dn�sron Sechon 1 � NARRATIYE [Refer to Code Chapter 18 3901 The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findmgs based on the applicable approval standards Fadure to provide a narrative or adequately address critena would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal The applicant should review the code for applicable critena � IMPACT STUDY [Refer to Code Secdons 18 390 040 and 18 390 0501 As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public faalities and services The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, includmg bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development For each public facdity system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to mirnmize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facdities systems, and affected private property users In situations where the Community Development Code reqwres the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either speafically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication reqwrement is not roughly proportional to the pro�ected impacts of the development [� ACCESS [Refer to Chapters 18105 and 18 7651 ��w T"0 P�� << a°�"��s�'r`9 "�`'�' Mirnmum number of accesses I �r „p�q�1 y�u,� Mirnmum access width _�� Mirnmum pavement width �' wl wrb5 All driveways and pa�lang areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved Dnve-in use quewng areas ❑ WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Secdon 18 705 0301 WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industnal uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress Walkways shall provide convenient connections befinreen buddings m multi-budding commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed befinreen a new development and neighboring developments ❑ SPECIAL SEi�ACKS tRefer to Code Chapter 18 7301 ➢ STREETS feet from the centerline of ➢ LOWER INTENSITY ZONES v a feet, along the site's w�.S�' boundary ➢ FLAG LOT 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK ❑ SPECIAL BUILDIN6 NEI6HT PROVISIOMS [Befer to Code Secbon 18 730 010 BJ BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buddings located in a non-residential zone may be bwit to a height o 75 feet provided that ➢ A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR)of 1 5 to 1 will exist, ➢ All actual bwlding setbacks will be at least half('/2)of the budding's height, and ➢ The structure wdf not abut a residential zoned distnct ❑ BUFFERIN6 AND SCREENIN6 [Refer to Code Chapter 18 7451 In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between ad�acent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certam site penmeters Required buffer areas are descnbed by the Code in terms of width Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deGduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance befinreen vertical and horizontal plantmgs Site obscunng screens or fences may also be reqwred, these are often advisable even if not reqwred by the Code The required buffer areas may o� be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code CITY OF TIGARD Pre-ApplicaUon Conference Notes Page 2 of 9 NON Residen6al Appfica6oNPlamm�g Drv�sion S�6on i The ESTIMATED REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS applicable to your proposal area are feet along north boundary feet along east boundary feet along south boundary feet along west boundary IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG ❑ IANDSCAPIN6 [Refer to Code Chapters 18 745,18 765 and 18 7051 STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the nght-of- way boundary Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect Landscaped parking areas shall mclude special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters ❑ RECYCLIN& [Refer to Code Chapter 18 7551 Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY Locating a trash/recycling enclosure withm a clear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parkmg lot is prohibited Much of Tigard is within Pnde Disposal's Service area Lenny Hing is the contact person and can be reached at (503) 625-6177 �PARKIN6 [Refer to Code Section 18 765 0401 c � REQUIRED parking for this type of use c-wri c� u-r �q,. ��r�n� f77 Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s) SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking � ti�.rl�,,��.ex�«r,� �ol nDO�I� SOGa.u- Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s) NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as foilows ➢ Standard parking space dimensions 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet, 6 mches ➢ Compact parking space dimensions 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 6 inches Note Parking space width mcludes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an ad�oining space Note A maximum of three(3)feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the m�rnmum percentage reqwrements HANDICAPPED PARKING ➢ All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as weli as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) A handout is available upon request A handicapped parkmg space symbol shall be painted on the parkmg space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted ➢ BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS BFCycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobde traffic and in convenient locations ❑ LOADIN6 AREA REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Secdon 18 765 0801 Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be p�ovided with a loading space The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer CITY OF TIGARD Pre ApplicaUon Conference Notes Page 3 of 9 NON Residen6al Appl�caUONPlanning Dn�sion Sechon ❑ BICYCLE RACKS [Refer to Code Secbon 18 7651 BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobde traffic and in convenient locations �' SENSITIVE IANDS [Refer to Code Chapter 18 7151 No ��►�✓�" P� �'s� The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND Staff wdl attempt to prelimmary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- application conference based on available information HOWEVER, the responsibtlit�r to precisely identify sensitive land areas, and their boundanes, is the responsibility of the applicant Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application Chapter 18 775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS ❑ STEEP SLOPES [Refer to Code Secdon 18 715 080 Cl When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18 775 080 C The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall indude specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18 775 080 C � CI�ANWA�R SERYICES[CWSI BUF�R STANDARDS [Refer to R a 0 96,44/USA Reguladons-Chapter 31 LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corndor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area Desi n Cnteria The EGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area The followmg table identifies the required widths TABLE 3 1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS SOURCE CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL/RESOLUTION 8 ORDER 96-44 SENSITIVE AREA DEFINITION SLOPE ADJACENT 4 WIDTH OF VEGETATED TO SENSITIVE AREA CORRIDOR PER SIDE • Streams with intermittent flow draining <25% � 10 to <50 acres 15 feet � >50 to <100 acres 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands <0 5 acre 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands >0 5 acre <25% 50 feet • Rivers, streams, and spnngs with year-round flow ♦ Streams with mtermittent flow drainmg >100 acres • Natural lakes and onds ♦ Streams with intermittent flow draining >25% �) 10 to <50 acres 30 feet � >50 to <100 acres 50 feet ♦ Existing or created wetlands >25% Variable from 50-200 feet Measure ♦ Rivers streams and springs with year-round flow in 25-foot increments from the startmg • Streams with mtermittent flow draining >100 acres point to the top of ravine(break in • Natural lakes and ponds <25%slope), add 35 feet past the top of ravine6 Starting point for measurement = edge of the defined channel (bankful flow) for streams/nvers delineated wetland boundary delineated spnng boundary and/or average high water for lakes or ponds whichever offers greatest resource protecUon Intermittent spnngs located a minimum of 15 feet wnthin the nver/stream or weUand vegetated comdor shall not serve as a starhng point for measurement SVegefated comdor averaging or reduchon is allowed only when the vegetated comdor is certrfied to be in a marginal or degraded condi�on sThe vegetated comdor extends 35 feet from the top of the rawne and seks the outer boundary of the vegetated comdor The 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet,if a stamped geotechrncal report confirms slope stabdity shall be mamtained vnth the reduced setbadc from the top of rav�ne CITY OF TIGARD Pre Applicahon Conference Notes Page 4 of 9 NON Residenhal AppficahoNPlannmg Drv�on Sechon Restnctions in the Ve etate Corridor NO structures, deve opment, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kmd, or other activities shall be permitted which othen�vise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as provided for m the CWS Des►gn and Construction Standards Location of Vegetated Corridor IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit .�� CWS Service Provider Letter PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the R8�0 96-44 sensitive area requirements If there are no sensitive areas, CWS must stdl issue a letter stating a CWS Sennce Provider Letter is not required `��vr,e, � ��ri�e. P�o 5a� r� ¢e�w�y a� u�c� o�l ❑ SI6NS [Referto Code Chapter18180) 5P`�'"' �'"'`� � �"`� "° "'_e�'P� rS Pr°Po� SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application Aiternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review ❑ TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Sectlon 18190 030 CJ A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, or conditional use is filed Protection is preferred over removal where possible THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following ➢ Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City, ➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18 790 060 D according to the foilowing standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots � Retainage of less than 25% of existmg trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18 150 070 D of no net loss of trees, � Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two- thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18 790 060 D , � Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18 790 060 D , � Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation, ➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed, and ➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that wdl be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoned as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18 790 060 D ❑ MIfl6AflON [Refer to Code Sec�on 18 790 060 El REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damaged is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of eqwvalent natural resource value CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Applicat�on Conference Notes Page 5 of 9 NON Residenhal ApphcahonlPlannmg D�v�sion Sechon ➢ If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall reqwre replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula � The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the sub�ect property, the Director may require one (1)or more replacement trees to be planted on other property withm the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, pnvate property ➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place m a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement � CLEAR YISION AREA [Refer to Code Chapter 18 7951 S�o� o� 1 u n S G� Gp r��e�( The Ci requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MA�NTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT�8) FEET IN HEtGHT at road/driveway, road/radroad, and road/road intersections The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existmg obstructions within the clear vision area � ❑ WATER RESOURCES OVERLAY DISTRICT [Refer to Code Secdon 18 797 0301 The WATER RESOURCES (WR) OVERLAY DISTRICT implements the policies of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and is intended to resolve conflicts between development and conservation of significant w tlands, streams and riparian corridors identified m the City of Tigard Local Wetlands Invent Specifically, this chapter allows reasonable economic use of property while establishing clear nd ob1 ective standards to protect significant wetlands and streams, limit development in desi ated nparian corridors, maintain and enhance water quality, maximize flood storage capacity, pres e native plant cover, minimize streambank erosion, maintain and enhance fish and wildlife habita , and conserve scenic, recreational and educational values of water resource areas Safe Harbor The WR OVERLAY DISTRICT LSO MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 5 (Natural Resources) an he "safe harbo�" provisions of the Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, Division 23) These provisio s require that "significanY' wetlands and riparian comdors be mapped and protected The Tualati River, which is also a "fish-bearing stream," has an average annual flow of more than 1000 cfs Ma�or Streams Streams which are mapped as "FISH-BEA G STREAMS" by the Oregon Department of Forestry and have an average annual flow less than 10 cubic feet per second (cfs) ➢ Ma�or streams in Tigard include FANNO REEK, ASH CREEK (EXCEPT THE NORTH FORK AND OTHER TRIBUTARY CREEKS) D BALL CREEK Mmor Streams Streams which are NOT "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" acc dmg to Oregon Department of Forestry maps Minor streams in Tigard include Summer Creek, De Dell Creek, Red Rock Creek, North Fork of Ash Creek and certain short tnbutaries of the Tualatin Ri er Ripanan Setback Area This AREA IS MEASURED HORIZONTALLY FROM AND PARALL L TO MAJOR STREAM OR TUALATIN RIVER TOP-OF-BANKS, OR THE EDGE OF AN ASSOCI TED WETLAND, whichever is greater The ripanan setback is the same as the "riparian coRidor ounda�' in OAR 660-23- 090(1)(d) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Applicahon Conference Notes Page 6 of 9 NON Residenhal AppfralwnlPlamm�g Dmsion Sechon ➢ The standard TUALATIN RIVER RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 75 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter ➢ The MAJOR STREAMS RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 50 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter ➢ ISOLATED WETLANDS AND MINOR STREAMS (includmg ad�acent wetlands) have no npanan setback, however, a 25-foot °water quality buffe�' is required under Cleanwater Services (CWS) standards adopted and administered by the City of Tigard ❑ RIPARIAN SEiBACK REDUCTIONS [Refer to Code Seceon 18 7971001 The DIRECTOR MAY APPROVE A SITE-SPECIFIC REDUCTION OF THE TUALATIN RIVER OR ANY MAJOR STREAM RIPARIAN SETBACK BY AS MUCH AS 50% to allow the placement of structures or impervious surfaces otherwise prohibited by this chapter, provided that equal or better protection for identified ma�or stream resources is ensured through streambank restoration and/or enhancement of nparian vegetation in preserved portions of the npanan setback area Eligibility for Riparian Setback in Disturbed Areas TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR A RIPARIAN SETBACK REDUCTION, the applicant must demonstrate that the nparian corndor was substantially disturbed at the time this regulation was adopted This determination must be based on the Vegetation Study required by Section 18 797 100 that demonstrates all of the following ➢ Native plant species currently cover less than 80% of the on-site nparian corridor area, ➢ The tree canopy cuRently covers less than 50% of the on-site nparian comdor and healthy trees have not been removed from the on-site riparian setback area for the last five years, ➢ That vegetation was not removed contrary to the provisions of Section 18 797 100 regulating removal of native plant species, ➢ That there will be no infringement into the 100-year floodplain, and ➢ The average slope of the ripanan area is not greater than 20% ❑ ADDI110NAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENi'S [Refer to Code Secdon 18 810 0601 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 2'h TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 1'/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district CODE CNAPTERS _ 18 330(Cond�hona�use) 18 620(rgard Tnargle�esgn standards) 18 765(offstreet Parwngl�oaduiy Reyuuemenis) _ 18 340(Diredors Interpretatron) 18 630(washington Square Regronal Center) �18 775(Sens�ve lands Re�ew) _ 18 350(P�anr�ed�eveapment) � 18 705�,a�9�a�,��> _ 18 780�sg�� _ 18 360(Srte Development Rev�ew) 'I8 7'I O(Accessory Res�denbal Un�) — 'I S 785(Temporary Use Permrts) _ 18 370(vanances►Ad�ustnents) 18 715(oensey�omputations) /18 790 R�R�o�� _ 18 380(Zomng Map/Text Amendments) 'I S 7ZO(Desgn CompaLbddy Standards) �7 18 795(V'�sual Clearanoe Areas) �18 385(Misoellaneous Pemuts) �S 7Z5(Enhronmental Perfortnance Shandards) _ �H 797(Water Resouroes(WR)Overlay D�sfict) �S 39O(Deasron MaWng Proceduresllmpad SOudy) �8 73O(Excep6ons To Development Shandards) 18 798(wire�ess Commumcatron Faal�es) ��S 4�O(Lot Lme Ad�ustrnents) 18 740(H�stonc Overiay) �'I 8 S�O(Street&Uhhty Improvement Standards) 18 420(�and Parebons) 18 742(Home ocapabon Perm�s► _ 18 430�s��a��o�� 18 745(�andscaPmy�s«eenmy standards) _ 18 510(Res�dentia�zonmg�ismcts) 18 750�n��ar,�dmnob�i Ho�R�� ' �8 5ZO(Commetaal Zonuig D�sficis) 1 S 755(M'aed Sof�WastelRecydmg Storage) � 18 530 pndusma�Zomng�ismcts) 18 760(Nonoontormmg S�tuabons) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-ApplicaUon Conference Notes Page 7 of 9 NON ResidenUal Appuca6oNPlamm�g Drv�swn Sec6on ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS � � �/l a�,✓ �(, o o vl `�t- f�-�a�t►1 o � GTV D✓� w l.ei� w �'d G IaG AR.v{'iU1 V J /t Gi. ✓ C�� !"I.��R. S✓�� t,d.v�✓�QfiS `aelf'�JG,t,ILS Nt�w.�.n✓rn ��l�Sck�/�.,�. GP.��rI�F.vw.�n�" r � �,X«.'h.-►� d�e,�olJwtt.r►,�'. C`�.y �„��U a[( !x p�) —� r �_Yw_ n..i � f�/1L[Q1.�Y"Ff7 � /, �_ - L.• /`�l 1��1 �o� PROCEDURE / ✓ Admirnstrative Staff Review Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer Public hearing before the Planrnng Commission Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City CounGl An additional public heanng shall be held by the City Counal APPLICAflON SUBMIITAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Commurnty Development Department at Tigard City Hail offices PLEASE NOTE A�plications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Drvis�on acceptance mav be returned The Planning counter closes at 4 00 PM Maps subm�tted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8 5 by 11 inches One (1), 8'/:' x 11" map of a proposed aroJect should be submitted for attachment to the staff reaort or administrative decis�on Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted The Planning Division and Engineenng Department wdl perform a preliminary review of the application and wdl determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal Staff wdl notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted matenals are required CITY OF TIGARD Pre-ApplicaUon Conference Notes Page 8 of 9 NON-Residen6al Appl�ca6oNPlannmg Dn�on Sec6on The administrative decision or public heanng wdltypically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an appiication is accepted as being complete by the f'lanning Division Applications involvmg difficult or protracted issues or requinng review by other �urisdictions may take additional time to review Wntten recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing A 10-day public appeal penod follo�s all land use decisions An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard �'I eu.r��v�, D F�r,�� A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is av dable from the Planning Division upon request Land use applications requiring a pubiic hear�ng must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site BUILDIN6 PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED Final inspection approvals by the Building Divis�on will not be granted until there �s compliance with all conditions of development approval These pre-applicat�on notes do not include comments from the Building Division For proposed bu�ldings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Buildmg Drvision Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from bemg constructed, as proposed Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the Cit 's olic is to a I those s stem development credits to the first buildingpermit issued m the develoqment UNL OTHER ISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DE OLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED) e con erence an no es canno cover a o e requiremen s an aspec s re a e o site planning that should ap ply to the development of your site plan Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not const�tute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements It is recommended that a pros-pective applicant either obtain and read tl�e Community Development Code or ask any uestions of City staff_relative to Code re uirements prior to submitting an ap lication AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Div�sion) � PREPARED BY cx' �(ti fITY OF TIGARD PLANNING IVISION STAFF PERSON HOLDING PAE APP MEETING PHONE (503) 639 4111 FAX. (503) 684-1291 E MAIL (sta�'s�rst name)a�u t�gard or us TITLE 18(CITY OF TIGARD S LOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT fODE)INTERNETADDRESS www cibgard or us H�pattylmasterslPre-App Notes Commercial doc Updated 1 Nov-2001 (Engineenng sect�on preapp eng) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Applicahon Conference Notes Page 9 of 9 NON Residen6al Appl�caUonlPlamm�g Dmsion Sechon CITY OF TIGARD LAND USE APPLICATION CHECKLIST Please read this form carefully in con�unction with the notes prov�ded to you at the pre- application conference This checklist identifies what is required for submittal of a complete land use application Once an application is deemed complete by Community Development staff, a decision may be issued within 6-8 weeks If you have additional questions after reviewing all of the information provided to you, please contact the staff person named below at the City of Tigard Planning Division, (503) 639-4171 Staff 1"l.o�'c�G.,n �rt.�-c,�., Date �vv�c, � ZbO� 1 BASIC INFORMATION ALL LAND USE APPLICATIONS REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING � Completed Application Form with property owner's signature or name of agent and letter of authorization � Title transfer instrument or grant deed � Wntten summary of proposal � Narrative demonstrating compliance with all applicable development standards and approval criteria (as specified in the Pre-Application Conference notes) � Two (2) sets of stamped, addressed #10 envelopes for all owners of property within 500 feet of the sub�ect property Mailing envelopes shall be standard legal-size (#10) addressed with 1" x 4 labels (see envelope submittal reqwrements) Property owner mading lists must be prepared by the City for a mirnmal fee (see request for 500' property owner mailing list form) � Documentary evidence of neighborhood meeting (if required) � Impact Study per Section 18 390 040 B 2 (e) � Copy of the Pre-Application Conference notes � Fding Fee 2 PLANS REQUIRED In addition to the above basic information each type of land use application wdl require one or more of the following maps or plans PLEASE SUBMIT EACH OF THE PLANS CHECKED BELOW WITH YOUR APPLICATION (Section 5 of this checklist provides details on what information to include on each plan) L�l/Vicmity Map ❑ Preliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan L�' Existing Conditions Map ❑ Preliminary Utdities Plan ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map ❑ Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan Gd� Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Ad�ustment Plan ❑ Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan ❑ Site Development Plan ❑ Architectural Drawings ❑ Landscape Plan ❑ Sign Drawings � Public Improvements/Streets Plan Mu.,� r�o{-tijr,pccu,y�� 3 NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED The City requires multiple copies of submittal materials The number of copies reqwred depends on the type of review process FOR AN APPLICATION SUCH AS YOU ARE PROPOSING THE CITY REQUIRES �_ COPIES OF ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS � } 3 P �J,, i,,,i�w( 5 v��,��I �-� �� c/bvw. Go ie.s W�T�1 / (�eil^'llG�n cD�"p�-�c.nu�, nevtew Ciry of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 1 of 5 4 SPECIAL STUDIES AND REPORTS Because of the nature of your pro�ect and/or the site you propose to develop THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL STUDIES WILL BE REQUIRED These studies must be prepared by certified professionals with experience in the appropriate field ❑ Local Streets Traffic Study ❑ Wetlands/Stream Corridor Delineation and Report ❑ Habitat Area Evaluation ❑ Geotechrncal Report ❑ Geotechnical Report must address liquefaction potential and soil bearing capacity ❑ Other 5 PREPARING PLANS AND MAPS Plans and maps should be prepared at an engineering scale (1" = 10/20/50/100/200) and include a north arrow legend and date The same scale should be used for all your plans Where possible the City prefers the use of a scale that allows a site plan or subdivision plat to be shown on a smgle sheet Architectural drawings may be prepared at an architectural scale One copy of each plan must be submitted in photo-ready 8'/2 x 11 format THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR EACH TYPE OF PLAN (If the plans you submit do not include all of the information requested because you feel it is not appiicable, please indicate this and provide a bnef explanation) V�cinity Map � Showing the location of the site in relation to ♦ Ad�acent properties ❑ • Surrounding street system including nearby intersections ❑ • Pedestrian ways and bikeways ❑ • Transit stops ❑ • Utdiry access ❑ Existing Conditions Map � Parcel boundaries dimensions and gross area ❑ � Contour lines(2 intenrals for 0-10%slopes or 5'for slopes >10%) ❑ � Drainage patterns and courses on the site and on ad�acent lands ❑ � Potential natural hazard areas including • Floodplain areas ❑ • Areas having a high seasonal water table within 24"of the surface for three or more weeks of the year ❑ • Slopes in excess of 25°/a ❑ • Unstable ground ❑ • Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ • Areas having severely weak foundation sods ❑ • Locations of resource areas including ♦ Wddlife habitat areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan ❑ • Wetlands ❑ � Other site features • Rock outcroppings ❑ • Trees with>_6°caliper measured 4 from ground level ' ❑ � Location and type of noise sources ❑ � Locations of existing structures and their uses ❑ � Locations of existing utdities and easements ❑ � Locations of existmg dedicated nght-of-ways ❑ Ciry of Tigard Land Use Appiicat�on Checklist Page 2 of 5 Subdrv�sion Preliminary Plat Map � The proposed name of the subdivision ❑ � Vicinity map showing property s relationship to artenal and collector streets ❑ � Names addresses and telephone numbers of the owner developer engineer surveyor and designer(as appi�cabie) ❑ � Scale north arrow and date ❑ � Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided � Names of ad�acent subdivisions or names of recorded owners of adJoining parcels of un-subdivided land ❑ � Contour lines related to a City-established benchmark at 2 intervals for 0-10%grades and 5 mtervals for grades greater than 10°/a ❑ � The purpose, location, type and size of all of the following (within and ad�acent to the proposed subdivision) • Public and private nght-of-ways and easements ❑ • Public and private sarntary and storm sewer lines ❑ ♦ Domestic water mains including fire hydrants ❑ ♦ Ma�or power telephone transmission lines (50 000 volts or greater) ❑ • Watercourses ❑ ♦ Deed reservations for parks open spaces pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ ♦ The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level ❑ • The location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ � Supplemental information mcluding ♦ Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ • A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements ❑ � Existing natural features including rock outcroppings, wetlands and marsh areas � The proposed lot configurations lot sizes and dimensions and lot numbers Where lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots ❑ � If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application materials ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Ad�ustment Plan � The owner of the sub�ect parcel ❑ � The owner s authonzed agent ❑ � The map scale north arrow and date ❑ � Proposed property lines ❑ � Descnption of parcel location and boundaries ❑ � Contour lines (2 intervals for slopes 0-10% or 5 for slopes >10%) ❑ � Location,width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and ad�acent to the parcel ❑ � Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25 of all property lines ❑ � Location and width of all water courses ❑ � Location of any trees with 6"or greater caliper at 4 above ground level ❑ � All slopes greater than 25% ❑ � Location of existmg and proposed utilities and utdity easements ❑ � Any applicable deed restnctions ❑ � Evidence that land partition wdl not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ � Future street extension plan showing existing and potential street connections ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 3 of 5 Site Development Plan � The proposed site and surround�ng properties ❑ � Contour line intervals ❑ � The locations dimensions and proposed names of the following ♦ Existing and platted streets and other public ways ❑ ♦ Easements on the site and on ad�oining properties ❑ ♦ Proposed streets or other public ways and easements on the site ❑ ♦ Alternative routes of dead-end or proposed streets that require future extensions ❑ � The locations and dimensions of the following ♦ Entrances and exits on the site ❑ ♦ Parking and circulation areas ❑ ♦ Loading and service areas ❑ ♦ Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑ • Outdoor common areas ❑ • Above ground utdities ❑ • Trash and recyclable matenal areas ❑ � The locations, dimensions and setback distances of the following ♦ Existing permanent structures, improvements, utdities and easements which are located on the site and on ad�acent property within 25 of the site ❑ • Proposed structures, improvements, utdities and easements on the site ❑ • Sanitary sewer facdities ❑ • Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ • Storm drainage facdities and analysis of downstream conditions ❑ � Locations and type(s)of outdoor lightmg considering crime prevention techniques ❑ � The locations of the following • All areas to be landscaped ❑ • Mailboxes ❑ ♦ Structures and their onentation ❑ Landscape Plan � Location of trees to be removed ❑ � Location size and species of existing plant materials ❑ � General location, size and species of proposed plan matenals ❑ � Landscape narrative that addresses ♦ Soil conditions and how plant selections were denved for them ❑ • Plans for sod treatment such as stockpding the top sod ❑ • Erosion control measures that wdl be used ❑ � Location and description of the irrigat�on system where applicable ❑ � Location and size of fences buffer areas and screening ❑ � Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas and common open spaces ❑ Public Improvements/Streets Plan � Proposed right-of-way locations and widths ❑ � A scaled cross-section of all proposed streets plus any reserve strips ❑ � Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 4 of 5 Grading/Erosion Control Plan � The locations and extent to which grading wdl take place ❑ � Existing and proposed contour Imes ❑ � Slope ratios ❑ Utilities Plan � Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans ❑ � Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the locations of valves and meter sizes ❑ � Fire hydrants (existing and proposed) ❑ � Proposed fire protection system ❑ Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan � The location of all areas sub�ect to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ � Location width and direction of flow of all water courses and drainageways ❑ � Location and estimated size of proposed storm drainage lines ❑ � Where applicable location and estimated size and dimensions of proposed water quality/detention facdity ❑ Tree Preservation/Mit�gation Plan � Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees ❑ � Program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal (Section 18 790 030) ❑ � A protection program defirnng standards and methods to be used during and after construction ❑ Architectural Drawings � Floor plans indicatmg the square footage of all structures and their proposed use ❑ � Elevation drawings for each elevation of the structure ❑ S�gn Drawings � Specify proposed location, size and height ❑ i\curpin\mastersUevised\checklist doc 1&Sep 01 City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 5 of 5 PRE-APPLICATI�N C�NFERENCE REQUEST CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4971 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY Applicant: Metro Parks & Greenspaces Dept. Address: 600 NE Grand Phone: 503-797-1548 Case No.: d""�� Z��r �� {'s.,-, Cit P�rtland, OR ZiP: 97232 Receipt No.: v�� a Y� April Olbrich Application Acce�ted By:� Contact Person: Phone: 503-797-1548 -' �r Date: �� L Property OwnerlDeed Holder(s): Fann� CYPP�t n�,-p�r.r DATE OF PRE-APP.: �� TIME OF PRE-APP.: a � (�Q Address: t��RS sw ��.r� ��g�� Phone: sn�_��Q_,Q�g PRE-APP. HELD WITH: � lLJ1 City: TiQard, OR Z�P� 972 � Rev.12l6/2000 i:\curpin\masterslrevised�Pre-AppRequest.doc Property AddresslLocation(s): South of Bonita Road West of 74th Avenue, adjacent to Fanno Creek REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS (Note: applications will � be accepted without the required submittal elements) Tax Map & Tax Lot#(s): 2S1W12AC 01200 . � Pre-Application Conf. Request Form Site Size: 4.03 2 COPIES EACH OF THE FOLLOWING: ��Brief Description of the Proposal and PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE INFORMATION any site-specific questions/issues that you would like to have staff research prior to the meeting. All of the information identified on this form are �equired to be �,�' submitted by the applicant and received by the Planning Division a Site Plan. The site plan must show the minimum of one �1] week prior to officially schedulina a proposed lots and/or building layouts pre-a�plication conference date/time to allow staff ample time to drawn to scale. Also, show the location of the subject property in relation to the prepare for the meeting. nearest streets; and the locations of riveways on the subject property and A pre-application conference can usually be scheduled within 1-2 across the street. weeks of the Planning Division's receipt of the request for either T�!PSd� or Thursday morninps. Pre-application conferences are The Proposed Uses. one (� hour long and are typically held between the hours of � Topographic Information. Include 9:00-11:00 AM. Contour Lines if Possible. ❑ If the Pre-Application Conference is for a PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCES MUST BE SCHEDULED IN MONOPOLE project, the applicant must PERSON AT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTER FROM attach a copy of the letter and proof in 8:00-4:OOIMONDAY-FRIDAY. the form of an affidavit of mailing, that the collocation protocol was completed IF MORE THAN 4 PEOPLE ARE EXPECTED TO ATTEND THE (see Section 18.798.080 of the Tigard PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IN YOUR GROUP, PLEASE Community Development Code). INFORM THE CITY IN ADVANCE SO THAT ALTERNATE ROOM {}� Filing Fee $240.00 ARRANGEMENTS CAN BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE THE `�" GROUP. �` . . . i�'lbR�;��1 �' . � �; Pre-Apps (CD Meetings) June 2002 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Tuesday, June 04, 2002 30 s:oo 8:30 9:00 Pre-app April Olbrich w/ Metro 503•797-1548/74th/Bonita/MLP (2) 9:30 10:00 Pre•app appt 10:30 11:00 Pre-app 11:30 12:00 12:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 11:03AM Thursday, May 23,2002 Diane Parke- preappdesc doc _ � �� _ � � � ��—� _ -�� _ _ -� page 1 ` � Proposed Use/Pre-App � I Metro and Fanno Creek Acres,LLC wish to split the 4 03 acre parcel through a minor i land partrtton mto two parcels 1)a 1 72 acre parcel immediately ad�acent to Fanno Creek ' which Metro will acquued, 2) a 2 31 acre parcel on which a commercial-mdustrial � structure �s currently located,which Fanno Creek Acres will retain Metro's dual purpose in acquinng a"green space'comdor in the Tigard area along ,' Fanno Creek is 1)to close the remaming `gaps' of the Fanno Creek Regional Trail and 2) to protect and enhance the associated ripanan and uplands areas of Fanno Creek In addrtion,the acquisition of these properties is more significant since the confluence of i Ball Creek and Fanno Creek is located on either the Fanno Creek Acres or the HorNel property � � II Metro and HorNel,Inc ,LLC,wish to splrt the 1 27 acre parcel through a minor land � partition into two parcels 1) a 82 acre parcel immediately ad�acent to Fanno Creek which Metro will acquired, 2)a 45 acre parcel on which a commercial mdustrial ' , structure will be built,which HorNel,Inc ,LLC will retam Metro s dual purpose in acquirmg a green space comdor in the Tigard area along � Fanno Creek is 1)to close the remammg`gaps' of the Fanno Creek Regional Trail and 2) � to protect and enhance the associated ripanan and uplands areas of Fanno Creek In addition,the acquisition of these properties is more significant since the confluence of , Ball Creek and Fanno Creek is located on either the Fanno Creek Acres or the HorNel property � � I\APRIL\TARGETAS�FANNOCRK\fannocrkacr\preappdesc doc I I I i I _ - _ _�___ � ,._ _ _ _ -- �-.- _ � � __ _.�.- _ _ __ _ __�_ - _ J . .�.' � �� E,� , �� '. � � � M� �. � ° � , �� , � ie `•� y�� rf� 1 � . � � - ..�i �. � S � -''� .w�T ! _,�•�; �. b i�', ' ti� -*-,,. � , �. -°�°--- - ! yllr. ` t'r � . �, ' � � � �, �'y _ � "�� .s.r a '' T . :� S•_a.. � ' �1 •.1� �� ' �� ` Q'' �� y 1- -- I1 • - ti +' �� T ��. !�� 1 t- , '� ' � � '�,��• l _ �,� �'. • 1' , � ' � ,�. , _ . -_� _ ,} � �� `��y +'�'* ''�__j - �c � — � ��, _ a a Q��.�� ,---0� -_ . Y - l�� "--"�-'°---_ . "�' - ;� - y � � �:.�=�r'°"�.� � s - �� , , a � �' � ^� _ '� :,. �,,.•� � .a. � � .�1,� �: ,« `��t . , , � _ ` �, �� w, � � � �� "'.'� j �' --�+'� ,�., ��ss�: � , �, � ::.�� , - �i ,�� ` = 4`j �° ,` �� y , a�� „ � :�� -� �. : � l � ; ' � `- � M� ,` � �� a�� ` �!1 � `� � �"`, • i• �.�� Existin9 � _ _ . ` -- , ,.�; ,.� . ��. ,. � City of Tigard �. �`� � �'�'� � � �� _ -�:; ,» �' , Open Space - �!. � _ �""�`." `.: �- `: " , 2S112AC00801 _ _ � . I `* „'• R ��.': %,`''�.r• . .-. ' �� • _ ' .,,y flss ` , �';`�..___- ,� ._y1Y, ' .♦ �r `�'�� +� ��.;�'_. . . �S•o ..ii _ rA j� `}t �!k � .' ,�. 1 ` Area retained by own.� + '_+ ,r �. �, �#"� � /.��f '� �� ..,,�. '�'� - ♦ � f� :�b ` ' � � '"!l�iJl� � � ~'-'"' �, 'r ..____.�.r�� ` �_� - �� r�� ,� • � A i� �;'M ��^ ��4�, � ��j, �..� �� ,�� ' � ,� � „-�' ��., 1..�. .+�� 1- � 1� -� n�- � 3E,F:rrx 82 acres �� .� �•��.;--�.• � � '',�� ^ �-, � t. ' � . # � ., �A -.� s ��. t�" �`1 r �� L��'.±�i', �'.d; �' �y - ;��r '� �.-�, �r .��,.,� �:r� � ,� - ,._� '� __ . t �'�F � � � .�. ..'�+a:, .�. "� � � 'r�q�r�;,; �,�,-� � ;�-� , i °� ;S� `�' �SS- � � � ..'`��'i�r1 a i '..t��. � - . � --� �� , t 1_. rs ' _, ; � "> :3cre5 ��,.'�� ;� , g� �_- 1 �� + �.. �w'!�'IL ;�1, ��"�i i i '� - n.. � �� - � ,..-' � ?f-. '�'}Mil�� :7 . ��.. _ � .i :�.! , , L �� .._ � -'�_ �� . � _ y��\� � ` _ ' � ,fa �� y -!� �� L � _r-:� ,� I �i*\� �� k �' �.�� •'�� x�1A�� •y�� _�:e� . - - -,•,Y ' :� ��,a'� . _ ,�.- — �. . :�� ,_ � :; . �� "� �� e -.� a r�Q .�_. � ;ej '-i .`�� staat� '-�.,�J_- �:-��'-� ' � � . G ' r�.w�.+:.-�w-',�s .., v-�,_=y.�.: �-,. ,_ - ,f� �� • > � �� Area retained by owner , � . --� � ,�, .� . � � _ - ; - �. �' � , _ . . � '�.4 . �. f '� • �� '4 t - ..sei. 7�'^^ - _ �' ,.� e - � �`� •� ` _ - -�� "�� -� � _t �� ..� .� { � :�.- , .. � . r _ .��, _ �t :,• .� �..� __ yr�,� �° , . k � . .:) . . S . ."t�i !. , .� �� 1A I � - +'.�` ��~ ' ��r. �'` -�:t.�� , ; _ y� ` �' �y. . � � ��! -_� {q ' i ' / .�a ' J _ • ✓. "�i� . �� R '�} _( i .. 'f � "�� ' �� t � � �{ • .Z - � . _ ls r �� i `.� ,_., j, l) • `..°�''��_ -� ' �.� j Y i. .. �� y :� . +� ;� � �+.. �' " ��.. w� � : R, F�� .� L t'�.� .a� � , ' i -. ... _ . �. ;� • �� +� �� • r � y•r, - • — 5�� .. �� 1 � �`�1� _ �, . `, `� *� `1 �.•- ;� ;�.�_ ..,. .. _ . , . . .. Lugend . . Proposed �-� �Area of Interest •°• Lot Line Adjustment �.. �-h.�---A�-��.,-..--.��-W open space to the City of Tigard ,.�'"�' washi g� o. � contours 5 ft PI'OIJeI`ty _.�_ ._..._.,..�.,�._w.P..�..,. _.M _.� __+ .�,. � 100yr Floodplain � inch equals 20o feet �e �,� 1�\houman\n�n�10t717\lennnlmnielnllf� hnrncl mv.l ��.��--- ' ' 7/O1/02 19 50 FA% 50�8463641 CLEAN wATER SERVICES [�002 . � � � �� \\ CleanWater Services Our cr�mniilni�iit �� cic.,�r July 1, 2002 Metro Office of General Counsel Attn Apr�l Olbrich 600 NE Grand Portland OR 97232 RE Partttion of Tax lot 1200 ad�acent to Ball and Fanno Cr�eks, Tigard (CWS file 2130, Tax map 2S112AC, Tax lot 1200) Clean Water Services has received your Sensitive Areas Cert�fication Form for the above referenced site Staff has �eviewed the Sensitive Areas Certificat�on Form, site condit�ons, and the descnption of your pro�ecL The pro�ect�nvolves part�tiornng off the ' sens�tive ar�as and vEgetated corridors from the developable propertaes Metro is purchasing th� propert�ES for nparian p�otect�on and habitat District staff concurs that the above referencEd pro�ecfi wdl not significantly impact the existing sensit�ve areas found near the site (n I�ght of this result th�s document will serve as your Servic� Provider letter as required by Resolution and Order 00-7, Section 3 02 1, and your Stormwater Connecfion authonzation from Clean Water Sernces as required by Ord�nance 27 Section 4 B All required permits and approvals must be obta�ned and completed under applicable local state, and federal law Pnor to any development on either paRitioned property, the applicant shall obtam � Service Provider Letter documenting the proposal's compliance with R&O 00-7, Chapter 3 This letter does NOT eliminate the need to protect sens�tive areas �f they are subsaquently ident�fied on the s�te If you have any quest�ons, pfease feef free to call me at 503-846-3613 Sincerely, �:�� `� Heidi K Berg Env�ronmental Plan Rev�ew E\Development Sves1SP 00 7LSPR Lecters�5112AC01200 B�ll Creek Parttt�on doc i55 N F�rst Avenue Suite 270•Hillsboro Oregon 97124 Phone (503)846-9621 • Fax (503)846 35z5•www cleanwaterservices org ,� . t � � =� � , ;+� ;�. �,,'T ��' ' - � �t' ' � �( � , , w �.d . ��f�ry. �`� �j� Exhibit 7f2 (,�s � w e �` e � � CY � Jr� ,� �� • ' y 'r � � — � e�° � _ ��, �� r... �- ;. 'x �.� - -- , � ` `�� ! y"�i s � � :�` :s. ""� �� e� 4w�.' � � �. '�'=,�„� �:��y , '� !• r .� - - � _ ' - �;,�._ � f _ _� . - �� -� 3 - � ,��l� �'. �, 'y x„ ., ' �� . r � •. a. �a �� -`� - ,��. M �� '�� _� ,y �'� - � "- c� _ ` i"� r^�4�'�,. ��A%j��: �' ; � � — 3`°�� __ — - "�� ' .._ aa- --'-=�� .. .� :. : -- ' � , `_�"��'� � -�� :�"�i � � � - � .� � =� , � � ,. „„�,r,,� ,t � t yy s ry ,� �� ,�. � . , p� � � �,i'�. f� _ .�. ; t.� � v :� :�� ; � � �,, ,� ,.�� =1 '' . � � �' ; � �! � �}, 4 - — ;,��,, � �`�.�`� ;a� � . ,� .� .. � � � _ . � � a � . , � k�� . � ;��" � 1 �� a ; � i ��._ � �, s;,� � ., �. .�i+ ::; y � ,� � , ., - " t,� _ � � � �,��. , r - . ,��L ��;-' ; .,. -r�,, ,� �` ��'"��_•,� � ��' '"�, ��+�.f,"Rk'+r�'� � �. "L � r' ♦ t � `. t� � ` •, � '� e�{`+� � _ - .: �. �� ,`�,j*��' r`�� ` r � ` �' +` �� s _ �";s��','y ''= _.� .�"- ....�,� � • s�' � .:''T,r � �a -�- z -..�� .r�.! � � .,�i''+•��i►, .%*'��' 'i��'ri'-,�- a J(. +�. .. � �r.� -. �'i. . �, � � i '��'�„� {� � '� � �' ,-"� ' �.R 5L., ��._�'Y�.- ` " .��''�1. �`'�.A ��}��. ` � ,'� �- -�� ' ��:, -r�'�tyt� �� _ .�+ ril�� .��- -.�'.-. _ ' ��",�` ,s �,' �.• -., .y �.s �� i �:� �7 :;;}� '�' � - ° .� �,.'' *i�'+�i .�� .�y�$� i �� :�,y � ;' �.. ,� � 1� ��., � •�j'.• C'� ...� �+ � � 'T ��sr` � �4��+�� ' ;�r ��•�� ." ""T- �. �1� r 1�_._�.. _.� ti s �!" �`1 Y �•, �'�3r�"R�`! �� '.,,�`1 _� =� ° y, ��i T` . y< « � �f. a �� ,. „?�{��,�! �_�x ? 't��.za�-� 3.'�"�'y�r � ��1�a c��'f �t.,,r ` •••--�� -�'. - _ ,"-'S -- ,C +, '��-� � � ��i1C 4a'Sd � ��_�J �' yt�`s. 'A a.\ '� 4: � .. _ - �,� t. �•'a� t� _ •.•� � .:.�:�� N -� - � m ; � � �pprox 1.72 acres � _ s�`'�� !� .�.�. �� ,� �,� ' ��€:. _ ,__ - - + _."� �:� -�t' � �� -� �� 7 �'' ,.� , ��.`�; �„ -��_ �� `�� :,ti�=��F'� . .- .� .f. ' � }�;1�+� 7I�.S. � �.� �s�`� '.� �� _ � .:�. �` � . , - � ._' � � . � �'�� -T�. . , , . = � �, � y � �' ; _ � : �- �r� �*1�i�i� � '—�� ,� �'� _ _ _ g= _ �� .� � �7, r:�. �. '�� `;�. _ :.�� ; ; - !a1'�'[3'�"&� �a � 1 �. . . � 's�-. _ �_ � 3 tY'�:'�� "'L�;` � - : � 1 � ' .: � ��„� -M1. . � . �i,`�J �r -l , t s . _ ��t - n.� x- �� ' —�, -�.. .r�� ,� . � `�' ��" ►�`'---�'� � �.� � � � .�... = Area retained by owner '��. -�--� {y� '� - ^' y _4„, _.� .. .�''rs""rfi�r�t'.'. �� ..' s�� _ 1� • '.- �, � � � '}; � ;k �y : . ' 1 ' - r 1'�� ,4 ?� 'I �"� � - �4 � k � � 1 �' �� ..�, .r _ _ - ._ 1 9' �� .� a , �+.; _ 'i ��, F' _ �' #R�'. �� ¢� � �* ,�,��i � M t ` �.:1 . . �1, ..4ry� � °�u4'�`�.' �``t�,-` F� � ''�, . `tt� ti� ct 1 1 ,�, ;� � �,; �rc� � � ��, • ..��J�� ' ,� �,r�• � - a� _.__. � ; s ,r,. �e �� . y'. ..`� -=.�1�' �; ` �� _t �� i- :� �� - � � _� ° �� k �,,i. j�� ' . .� ,�ps .� �+�, � 1� ��' _ +� .r. _ .3 •. � .:�' i•�. `� �.. - � ,4�- . • • � �.� �� .� ,vr .% '.� f' . � ��1�. �, � I � � .. � s� •_ � � K:• � �'s` �f ; ? �'/ I_.� �'�` ' t', t _ r ! �r� j� ��"�+ �� , ��`' � � 1�� ' _' '� � '', - :.�"�`� �i �� /+11� � � , ?7 � � 7 �" Y� SYA'. � 1 Y'� �'d•� �: �� .f�'�� . �� '.4 '� �. _ __ �� -..�� - Yi � �� -�; �. ��,� �� ,S , � tI: ' � �' s.. �� 1 ��•. i � -_ `zi� ,� � c _ ` � �� . . � ��.,�Y��' I � � . - �t .��' .ai +� .- � ��. i t ' -�a. ; + + y � :*;' . � � � � *,� � -s`� /��_ ,'f �'- •.� -�� . - - ��1� S. . ' . . � ,�:��` � _ .6C 1 �� r �_:."� � `'� ;,;r :� �Y��_ --- � . � - �i�:'� -'t��.ei 'f; - '! '�� . . . i �.��J t f;.�`, �� ' _ � i'��.�) .� - «�r-YS :`�i ��g' -. �_.-o`� � _' "L rt � i ` � t.:3 �� ' � � � r ��, ' -�� " �� ,�� a �� ` 1 ''� �`4 -.�� . � ., �� _.— �Area of Interest Proposed __ o_a—...�.d..�:_...-= ,Open space p�ition ••—��! ashi gtr�tl o. LJ � contours 5 ft _.�_-:_._._�.,.._._...__.:_.-, -��;;I;�..... � 100yr Floodplain 1'inch equals 200 fset -— w��.o bt dme:May 3,2002 J:\fraeman�pro�195212Vanno4ngis5pltfc_hwnel_s2.mxd "'---"^°, LAND TECH, INC. 6�iCR(�1STEqRED - SU37F¢2 CANYON LANE EXhI r rr4 Ptl'YV�IC��IO' 1. POR7LAND, OREGON 97225 ��.11 SI IP]�/C . `� � (SOJ)291-939B � �r�r v� (FAX) 291-1613 � R.L C. ✓N 4B5 � 1 G.•�OWC1000�1112�Mopping�Current Mops�1112PP2- Letter.dwg I ^ � � J 1)AiiY f� � � 20 FOOT EASEMENT FOR EDWARD KIP�t;P�LPS CONSTRUCTION OF AN � Of/ERFLOW CHANNEL AS PER DOCUMENT N0. 89-01B56. �fC f��f1-� lz�?��`C� � - S00�5'S8"W 384.08' scAtE �=so' % 47.25" 0 � 30 FOO T SEWER — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — �N EASEMENT AS PER BOOK — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 862, PAGE 6B6. S 00 OS SB° W 258..30� I o I^ EASEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF AN O IiERFL OW CHANNEL A S L — PER DOCUMENT NO. 47.25� 89-01856. N 00 OS 58"E 90.00' . � � � � � 3 ►� PARCEL 1 � � � 9B,183 SF � 0 3 �' PARCEL 2 � ; 77,289 SF � � q �0 � � � � � � DOCU,1lEiyT Np g9-1�8520 ��i�� - ti �.o CITY OF TIGA� � �'� �3s._�.i'ti�'tiiM1�L�:�'i�\�.�'a.d��:._i_�i�i<i�4�'' �js � s �� o� N90�0'00"W ��, S 02�9'00" E 255.66' �s�� f0.01' NO2�9,00„W 201.06' — -----_ �- - - ,5' W. 74 TH A I/ENUE � � � � , Routing Order: Surveyor: JRH Development Review Engineer BDR FINAL PLAT REVIEW CHECKLIST Plat Name: Metro Partition Plats Case Number(s): MLP2002-00007 r�-ffi4,5� Address/Location: �4�'l5 SW 74�'Avenue �'?�l-�� L I��!C,(,J Contact name and phone: Sam Edwards/Land Tech/503/291-9398 Date Received: 10/17/02 Date Forwarded to City Surveyor: 10/28/02 SURVEY SECTION Check if Check if Considered Okay 1. Street alignment and width, continuity 0 ^�� ❑ 2. Curve, corner, cul-de-sac radii 0��- ❑ 3. Dedication, vacation, easement conveyance [� ❑ 4. Residential Survey Certificate match the map [� [� 5. Two Monument Ties to City GPS [� � Comments: ��q }`f_�i F - �--�q.� /V D � I��C t Ga7� O- U .• 4 By: �c-' r' �� 1�- 2q-o �- Surveyo�'s Signatu e Date Page 1 of 1 i:�qtpM4evVamsNnpat.dot Revlsqn Aate: 1/1/Ot • Routing Order: � 1. Current Planning: MET 2. Engineering Tech I ST 3. Development Review Engineer BDR FINAL PLAT REVIEW CHECKLIST Plat Name: Metro Partition Plats Case Number(s): MLP2002-00007 Date Received: 10/17/02 Date Forwarded to Current Planning: 70/28/02 Planner: Morgan Tracy Planning Division Check if Check if Considered Okay 1. Phase boundaries N/� ❑ [� 2. Lot and/or tract size and configuration [� [� 3. Lot numbers ��2 � �(•�� C�" �❑ r,v�,T�- 4. Access restrictions, reserve strips [� [� ��r�� 5. Condition of Approval Satisfied Q � �s no�a on�fw}; 6. Public & Private streets (location, width, etc....,) Nj�-E] [� 7. Preliminary Plat approval date - 1 yr period OK [�� [� 8. Special Deed Restrictions (CC&R's) [� [� 9. Open Space (Deed or Dedication) [✓]� �L,��o� ��'� " P��' 10.SPECIAL SETBACKS ARE �'�i�—" Other Comments: �4G I'Lll.� LK `•N��JU W�Y W�J By; % � l�%?S�oZ Plann r's Signature Date FORWARDED TO ENGINEERING TECH I: lO�ZS�o2 Date Page 1 of 3 �:�„��.o� Reelsbn Eale: 1/1/Ot ,� � ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (Engineering Tech) Check if Okay Street Names Acceptable ❑ Assign Address(es) ❑ Address Fee �_lots/tracts @ $30 00/ea = $ � � ❑ Update City-wide maps ❑ ❑ Comments By ��,/� �-�c..� l/l 1(d�..— Engineenng Tech Signature Date FORWARDED TO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ENGINEER Date Page 2 of 3 ��ne�pM-0e�nrorrriswo-wacaa Rev�vondate 1/1I01 �� ' � � Retumed to Surveyor for Correction BY: f�l� �i DATE: ir S �L- � E-mail to County Surveyor: "OK to review" BY: �—�5 I DATE: ��2 Corrections Reviewed and Approved BY: S DATE: I 1 1� i� Forwarded for City Signatures BY: `�-i DATE: 1 I� 1I�._� Copy of Signed Plat Made and Put in File BY: -� DATE: L�l�S�jU3 Released to Developer for Recording BY: �j� J DATE: �Z��U� Authorize Eng. Tech I to release addresses BY: S i DATE: �I2�1�,.', - Copy of Signed Plat to Permit Techs BY: �i DATE: r �2�I c-� Lognote: OK to take in building permit apps. BY: � DATE: �?��'-� Page 3 of 3 ��ae�vamsv�.aa.aa Revf6qn Oate: 1/1N1 / _� 12/16/2003 �f Conditions Associated With 9:29:28AM T I D E M A R K Case #: MLP2002-00007 CUMPUTEH SYSTEMS. INC. f'nn�litio�i : _:::. ;. ' !:: St�ilu� ;. �t�a�ed ;:;: `. ��c #3� :::: (.'i��ic `:: ';:Tli�e : > Hc�lc! 5idWs C:I��ui�,;c�l i3v �I��i�; ; _ . : _ . _ _ ._ . _ ____ _ _.. l P_1�' S30 ADDRESSING FEE '�onc Mct I 1 1� '��u� f3DlZ 11/18/2002 E3DR 1. Prior to approval of the final plat,the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of�30.00. (STAFF CONTACT: Shirley Treat, Engineering). 1 74TH AVE. ADDTN'L. ROW DEDICATION None Met 11/18/2002 BDR 11/18/2002 BDR 2. Additional rigl�t-of-w�ay shall be dedicated to the Public along tl�e frontage of 74t1i Avenue to increase tl�e right-of-way to 25 feet from the centerline adjacent to Tract A. The description shall be tied to ttie existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. 1 GPS COORDINATES None Met 11/18/2002 BDR 11/18/2002 BDR 3. Ttie applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS)geodetic control network. These monumeuts shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordi►iates, tlie plat sliall contain tl�c scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be established by: -GPS tie networked to the Cit}�s GPS survey. -By random traverse using conventional surveying methods. 1 F-PLAT SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS None Met 11/18/2002 BDR 11/18/2002 BDR 4. Final Plat Application Submission Requuements: A. Submit for City review four(4)paper copies of the final plat prepared by a land surveyor liccnsed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative. B. Attach a check in the amount of the cunent final plat review fee(Contact Planning/Engineering Permit Teclmicians, at(503) 639-4171, ext. 2421). C. The final plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes(ORS 92.05), Washington County, and by the City of Tigard. D. The right-of-way dedication for 74th Avenue shall be made on the final plat. E. NOTE: Washington County will not begin their review of the final plat until they receive notice froni the Engineering Department indicating that the City has reviewed the final plat and submitted comments to die applicant's surveyor. F. After the City and County have reviewed the final plat, submit two mylar copies of the final plat for City Engineer signariirc(for partitions), or City Engineer and Community Development Director signatures (for subdivisions). 1 TRACT A DESIGNATED AS OPEN SPACE None Met 11/18/2002 MET l]/18/2003 BDR 5. Tract A shall be designated as open space on the plat. The following note shall also be placed on the Gnal plat: "No development shall be pemiitted on Tract A that is inconsistent with the intent of providing open space. Public access and structures necessary for providing public access,provision of below grade utilities, and structures and grading for stormwater management may be permissible subject to prior sensitive lands review aud approval." 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT NO CONST./TRAC7 None Met 1/27/2003 MET 1/27/2003 ST 6. The applicant/owner shall certify their acknowledgement that the approval of this partition docs not authorize the construction of an access drive or any other site improveme�its on Tract A. Such improvements will require sensitive lands review and will further ueed to meet We standards of Chapter 18.705. 1 RECORD TRACT A BLANKET EASEMENT None Met 1/27/2003 MET 1/27/2003 ST 7. The applicant/owner shall record either a blanket easeme�iit to the City allowing a bikeway to be extended througl� Tract A, or shall coordinate with the City(Contact: Duane Roberts, ext. 2444)to establish a specific easement for the bikeway. Page 1 Of 1 ('ase�'unSition�c r�� • b(;�:� .�'.. ��S l G N A N D G V'f N U E P O R T L A N D 'J R I (.O fv � . ! / 1 G t 3 J T E L 5 0 3 7 9 � ' �0 J F q x 5 0 3 7 9 7 1 1 9 1 + � March 6, 2003 M E T R O Mr. Morgan Tracy Associate Planner City of Tigard Community Development 13125 SW Hall Blvd. �I'igard, OR 97223 Dear Morgan: Re: Minor Partitions: Tigard MP 2002-00007 & 2002- 00008; copies of recorded Minor Partition Plats. recorded Easement& two recorded Blanket Trail Easements Please find enclosed the following for your files: 1) Copy of recorded Minor Partition Plat 2003-009, Tigard MP 2002 00007 (Fanno Creek Acres, LLC); 2} Copy of recorded Easement for Access granted by Fanno Creek Acres, LLC to HorNel, LLC; 3) Copy of recorded Blanket Trail Easement between Fanno Creek Acres, LLC, Metro, and City of Tigard; 4) Copy of recorded Minor Partition Plat 2003-010, Tigard MP 2002- 00008 (HorNel, LLC); and 5) Copy of recorded Blanket Trail Easement between HorNel, LLC, Metro and City of Tigard. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 503-797-1548 or at olbricha(cr�,metro.dst.or.us. As always, it is a pleasure working with you. Thanks for your assistance. Sincerely, � � April brich Senior I;egal Assistant Enclosures M:\attomey\contidentialWYKI L\TARGETAS\FANNOCRK\fannocrkacr\tigardlt2.doc Page 1 of 1 Re�ycleJ Pape� www.metro-region.org T D D )9) 1 8 0 4 a ��y€ �� qs � �� ;fi�� 8 $�i=� �� O ` a 9 � » �� , ��a gq ¢ �a � Y � �`� �� w � � � � �� °�,�� i � $ ��$3$' tor�a $q� �� FANNO CR£f/[ACR£ 7RACT5' $� — Ne�`JOY1Y'Y' � ,��, p�'� .c�ar �g I � � � \� M �-�'°� � � � � �I M �� i I � . � � � �o �o \� � I$�M�� \ ' I� �� \� J � A� ti � C � a` �� a � g � � � � � � � � z sn 8 \ � � IRR �� Mrn°arr �� § i tY $� � � � �� i I�� I � fl � � I� �� D o s I� q � � �� i $ $ �� , � �� , � M � �� ` � 4$= o $ �;� _ a' ��, 'a"'� � a ao ao q �� i � � Z �I � �� I =°'' Sd?'N711� .T17Q1 �yi a !3 Y� �'y,� �� R� � '� I o b ` �� ;� �e ,, y oppMmVr np Amv-msJq u1M9r Y p ¢`y�� s� = y�Q�7 � � q �Qtl]. I p �Y a� 8 O e �� "'��bQ � ` 7p 75 33a Yk`vtitrtTiRtr R @ � ��R R� b �Ea��Q�� 5�� 3� � t5 �� R��B�� y 0 9 m��• � F�� q �dCS e` a ��'�� _'�� g�� B ° �� i ` � �,a ��'�� o �� 9 �� - ., �� Y � �� a 6' � � �� €� �_ �� Z~ �� w� h �� " � �� a�� A a b � °� � O � b � �� 7� � � ��7� ��-•� a ..� esa � ��\� � � e � z�c� �� t ��• y a � �R �� b ��-� � II r � a .� �� y g �b�`�� ¢�� g �� g� � �gy�� g� �� a �e � � � � g� � �,eB; a $� � e �& � � �� g@�D o � oa � � t �$ �� N �� h"� � � ��6�� a� � a � � � � e e y � � y 9 � � �� @ � �°��` g� � � � �� R �� t ' � t �� °� `� ° � � 1 � �� E ��3 �b�Xra� � _N1lI�d �� $t�e� �$� k�s �p��8a� � a9 � �3 � �_�� qa �p� ��g�ga � � y� .� �a �� ky4�� L� i�� ep�� a � E i y�2�6e ��t� E� �an � � v �� '' � � �� p��g;�� a � v, D 6 y i t C ; �� b� � �� e�s�� "�4 5;�� i�$6��pph � � �� tl � � Y�� .A ki ��'l ��b ��6 ��6��d� � s a � �G R g � � BY ab�� eF 4 ��i�� s�$� �� g �� tk�� Q��°�� ,�� p p� � �� ¢ �� ° �� 3a�i :��•� ��na� � � �� 4@QY��e��@$� ��E� � � � �� ¢ g � �� as E � �g�� pt ��°� �o�"e�e � � �4�"� g�� e �e� ; Y 6 2 ��•�� i��y��ne � 5��$'� i �� ei� � �� pq qpp 9y ipg � p � � � (��ta@ �A�g �a4e � � ��g� C8� ai '� � h�$ i�� y �S�@��i��46;ti��s � ��d$�Sg4 � �� 3 tl 4 �e �h� � � ��l� �g e�� x = �a �$ �� Yt � p ��9� 3I ��8�e�! � ��;�z� � 5 $� A�� ..��l�� 2��ia / � �i�ngton County Oregon 2003-001859 �� 01l0712001 09 02 47 AM p-� Crd•7 Btn■7 K GftUNEWALD � �After recording,return to s+s oo se oo s++oo Tocoi•s32 00 `` Ch�ca o Title Insurance Com an I IIIII IIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIII I II I I III g P Y III II I III Attn Bill McCorkle 00217897200300018590030033 I J�rry Hvaon Dlnctor of A��m�nt uid Tuatlon 10001 S E Sunn side Road Suite 100 .�a E_-0+►��io co�n�a.n�ro�w..nmoe�co�� y 7 Unpon do h�nby c�rliy thd lh�wlthM In�trum�nt of� Clackamas OR97015 +h.+n�aw..n�.��.a.na�o�a.d��iw.eoowor � neord.of.de coudy ��yp.,� J�rry 0.H�n�oq Olnctor ts�e�mtM snd Tu�tlon EROf11da CWnty Cl�rk EASEMENT FANNO CREEK ACRES, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, grantor, grants and conveys to HORNEL, L L C, an Oregon I�m�ted ltability company, grantee, the following easement An easement for access as described on the attached exh�bit "A," and shown by dlustration on Exhibit"B" The easement shall be appurtenant to that property descr�bed m Exlnb�t "C" of Document No 2002-088349 The true considerahon for this conveyance is$0 00 Dated this Z day of �(� �d3 , Z89�, if a corporate grantor, it has caused its name to be s�gned by the board of directors BY FANNO CREEK ACRES,LLC, an Oregon 6m�ted l�abil�ty company , � Gale Nelson, mber G�C��ll�� STATE OF OREGON,County of W�as#�gte�,ss Thts mstrument was acknowledged before me by Gale Nelson as Member of FANNO CREEK ACRES, LLC, an Oregon limited liab�lity company, on �JQ� Z 2E,Y�3 ZD�O$. Before OFFIC�AL SEAL MARY JO MC GAUVRAN � NOTARY PUBUC-0REGON ary lic for Oregon COMMISSION NO 354628 Y C m�ss�on exp�res s.3 Q —� MY COMMiSSION EXPIRES MAY 30 20n✓� , x --- - � - --- . � I��'��I I� � 2003-1839 RE�ISTERED LAN D�ECH �r�o sus Q�oR INCORPORATED Englnes�uj $iuveying•Planning � EXH/8/T"A» ,u+r►uar,e , Access Easement EpWpFtD KING PHELPS JN 1112 Z� Ocfober 21, 2002 ,�C��S i Z_3�-oz� An Access Easementl5 feet w�de over a porfion of fhat tract of land as descnbed rn Document No 2000-088349, Wash►ngton County Deed Recorcls s�tuated in fhe Northeasf Quarter of Sect�on 12, Townsh�p 2 Soufh, Range 1 West, Willamette Mend►an, Crfy of TigarrJ, Wash►ngfon County, Oregon, ly�ng 7 50 feet on each side of the cenferline be�ng more part�cularfy descnbed as follows Begmn�ng at a po�nf on the west nghf of way line of S W 74�'Avenue (40 feet w�de), S02°09'00"E, a distance of 65 76 feet from the northeast comer of fhat tract of land as descnbed�n Document No 2000-088349, Washington County Deed Records as Exh�b►t°8'; fhence S89°56'20"W, a distance of 8105 feet to a pornf on the southeasterly Irne of that tract of land as descnbed in Document No 2000-088349, Wash�ngton County Deed Records as Exhib�t"C"and the fermmus The sidel�nes of said 15 foot easement to be exfended or shortened to meet at the westerly nght of way l�ne of S W 74�'Avenue and fhe southeasterly l�ne of that tract of land as descnbed►n Document No 2000.088349, Wash�ngton County Deed Recorris as Exh�bit"C" Sa�d easement�s for access to a port�on of thaf tract of land as descnbed�n Document No 2000-088349, Washrngton County Deed Records as Exh�b�t"C'; s�tuated►n the Northeast Quarter of Secbon 12, Townsh�p 2 South, Range 1 West, �llamette Mend�an, C►ty of Tigard, Wash►ngfon County, Or�egon, Tract 1 be�ng more part�cularly descnbed as follows Begmnmg at the southwest comer of sard tract of land, thence along the wesf l�ne of said fract of land, fhence NDO°05'58°E, a d�stance of 131 75 feet fo fhe northwest comer of said tracf, thence along the north Ime of sa�d fract, N89°57'11"E, a distance of 244 87 feet, thence S13°53'04"E, a d�stance of 103 50 feet, thence N89°57'11"E, a d�stance of 60 48 feet, thence N83°24'40°E, a drstance of 7519 feet to a po�nt on fhe southeasterly l�ne of sa�d tracf of land, thence along sa�d southeasterly Ime, S50°03'47"W, a d�stance of 61 95 feet to the southeast comer of sa�d tract, thence along the south l�ne of sa�d tracf, S89°56'20"W, a d�sfance of 357 61 feet to the Po�nt of Beg�nnmg G IDwg1000111121MappinglDocs11912 Access Easement doc 8835 SW Canyon Lane#402 Porfland OR 97225 Phone (503)291-9398 Fax (503) 291-1613 1 � _�IBIT B �JCCESS EASEMENT OVFR A TRACT OF LAND AS PER DOCUMENT IN FEE NO 2000-088349, WASHINGTON COUNTY DEED RECOROS, lN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SEC110N 12, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, W/LLAMETTE MERIDIAN, CITY OF TIGARD, WASH/NGTON COUNTY, STATE OF OREGON OCTOBER 21, 2002 ee��w�NH6N��C 'Y SUIT£ 407 PORTLANO OR£GON 97225 (SOJJ 291-9J98 (FAXJ 291-1613 R�� ,� ,,,z �, LT s C �OWG1000\1172�Mapping�Cunenf Mops �111? £xhibrt B dwg y SCALE 1"-60' S 89 571!" W 442 74 194 B7 3 `" ,�°o n 1w h A � TRACT f 1A Z W � h `W �. � I Q DOCUM£NT NO ?000-088349 0 �9 � EXH/BlT C" �895711£ N8374 40£ ,Q�,��A ^ PO/NT OF BEG/NN/NC 6�46 ��9� ,0.�A� e TRACT 1 6� � y0— — SB9�620"W 35761 5895620 W� 20, 81 OS 15 ACC£SS£AS£MENT PO/NT OF BECINN/NC � I Z4� S Q O h � 3 ^ � ODCUM£NT NO 2000-08BJ49 p � EXNIBII B p W � I � h � Q O 2 REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR OREGON � JANUARY 19 1993 EDWARD KING PHELPS 2586 EXP/RES 12-J7-02 S B9 49 42 W 462 97 � IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�III IIIII III 2003-1838 , Washington County,Oregon 2003-003115 � 01/08/2003 02 24 35 PM Df Cnt=1 6tn=g RECOR081 S23 00 58 00 511 00 Tota1 a sqy pp 2� Joel E Mort ing Return To 00237234200300031150050053 Metro, Office of General Counsel 4��rtYHaruon,Dlnctoro/A�s��m�r�t�ndT�aatlon I � and E:-0Ricb County Cl�rk/or Waehtnpton CouMy � 600 NE Grand Avenue or.ao� do h�nby c�rtly thd th�wkhln InsVUmoM of + �I/' wrltlnp wa ncdvW�nd ncord�d In�book M � �� Portland OR 97232 ncord�oi�ald couMy � J�rry R Hanson Dlndor��m�nt and Taxatlon • 2� Ezdfflclo Courrty Cl�rtc BLANKET TRAIL EASEMENT Fanno Creek Acres, LLC, an Oregon limited l�ability company, and Metro, a municipal corporation, do hereby grant to the City of Tigard, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Oregon, its successors and assigns("Tigard"), sub�ect to the terms and conditions hereafter provided, a bicycle and pedestrian trail easement and right- of-way for public use(collectively the"Blanket Easement")over the real property of Fanno Creek Acres, LLC and Metro, its successors and assigns ("Grantor") 1 R�ghts By this grant, Grantor grants and Tigard accepts a blanket easement over the Metro Property, situated in the County of Washington, State of Oregon, as more fully described below and on Exhibit A attached hereto and by this reference mcorporated herein (the "Blanket Easement")providing for the construction by Tigard, its agents or assigns of a 14-foot wide connected segment of public bicycle and pedestnan trail along Fanno Creek, passing bet��een the north and south boundaries of the Property(the "Trail") The exact location of the Trail shall be determmed after Tigard's design is complete and development approval have been received 2 Construction, Repair, Mamtenance Tigard, its agents and assigns shall be solely respons�ble for construction of the Trail improvements to be located within the Blanket Easement Tigard must notify Metro in wnting no less than 30 days pnor to the construction inception date and obtain all necessary governmental permits for such work prior to Trail construction Metro hereby agrees to cooperate in good faith with Tigard m obtairung said development permits Tigard, its employees, agents and assigns may access the Metro Property for occasional pre-construction inspection, Trail design, survey and predevelopment engineer�na study Tigard, its agents and assigns shall be solely responsible for repair and maintenance of the Trail improvements to be located within the Blanket Easement 3 Durat�on —Possibility of Reverter This Blanket Easement shall continue so long as the Trail izmains �ncomplete However, upon the completion of Trail construction, Tigard's ulteiest in that portion of the Blanket Easement located 1) west of a line drawn 10 feet west of and pa�allel to the Trail's centerline, and 2) east of a line drawn 10 feet east of and parallel to the T�ail s centerline shall automatically terminate, and that portion of the Blanket Easement �hall reveit to Metro, its successors and assigns 4 C��enants The ternis, cond�t�ons and provis�ons of this Blanket Easement shall c�tend to 1nd be bindin� upon the successors and ass�gns of the parties hereto P�� I f3L �NhL I riinii� CnSCMCNT / �� 2003-3115 Grantor represents and warrants that this Grant of Blanket Trail Easement does not violate any of the terms or conditions of any other agreement to which Grantor is a party, and that th�s Grant of Blanket Trail Easement requires no consent or approval of any party other than Grantor y� IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this instrument this � day of Qc�..� , 20(X� METRO, a municipal corporation TIGARD, a municipal corporation Ci P ��..�..�.,-.� � Mike Burton, Executive Officer Its C: ., �c.g-r' FANNO CREEK ACRES, LLC An Oregon limited liability company, G e Nelson ember Exhibit A Legal Descnption, Blanket Trail Easement I'��c 2 L3La�'hL'I'TRAIL CASCMENT � 1' I�� 2003-3115 State of Oregon ) ss County of Multnomah ) On this�_day of b,�' , 2002, be�re me v�l/ � �J 1 �,c� the undersi ned Notary Public, personally appeared 'YC�� .d r� , as �,e� 6 et,�f Metro, a munic�pal corporation,personally known to me (or proved to be on the sis of satisfactory ev�dence) to be the person whose name is subscribed to this instrument, and acknowledged that he executed it .� My commis ion expires _( o—� 3-Z a�S OFFICIAL SEAL V L APRIL OLBRICH State of Oregon � NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO 349624 SS MY COMMISSION EXPIRES OCT 13 20D5 County of Waslungton ) On this `7`�' day of 200�, before me �iAs,e /y� �e l�c rl�c , the undersigned Notary Publ�c, personally peared �u,s� � L�.eM,,,,,, as £n � of City of Tigard, a mumcipal corporation,personally known to me (or pro ed to e on the basis of satisfactory evidence)to be the perspn whose name is subscribed to this instrument, and acknowledged that he exec ted �t c= �`( My commission ues OFFICIAL SEAL DIANE M JELDERKS State of Oregon � CO M SSIO uN0 3E26578 SS MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT 07 2003 County of�i�as�rng�an ) L�G�� Zao3 �/n On this Z day of �CU�, ,�6&�, before me `%�G�� `.,` ��l��L1�j the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared Gale Nelson, as member of Fanno Creek Acres, LLC , an Oregon limited liability company, personally known to me(or proved to be on the basis of satisfactory ev�dence) to be the person whose name is subscribed to this instrument, and acknowledged that he executed rt C.�- y om � s�on expires ��f1- OFF�C�AL SEAL MARY JO MC GAUVRAN NOTARY PUBLiC OREGON COrJ�MtSSION NO 35a628 I'i,c > L3LANtiCT�RAIL CASCMENT MYCOMnniSSION EXPIRES MAY 30 2005 / ` 2003-3115 EXHIBIT A Being a tract of land located in the Northeast quarter of Section 12, Township 2 Soutli, Range 1 West, W M , in the C�ty of Tigard, County of Wash�ngton and State of Oregon as further descr�bed Beginning at the initial point, sa�d imtial point being a 5/8"by 30" iron rod with a yellow plastic cap inscribed "Land Tech", said imtial pomt being the Northwest comer of that property described in Exhibit B of Document No 2002-088349, Washington County, QR Records, said initial point being on the center of the North-South section lme of Sect�on 12, and being South O 1°26'14" West 1935 63 feet from a 3 '/4"brass disk marking the North one quarter corner of Section 12, thence South 88°43"24"East a distance of 357 61 feet, thence North 51°24'03" East a distance of 114 19 feet to said westerly r�ght of way of SW 74`h Avenue, thence along said right of way line of SW 74�'Avenue, South 00°48'44"East, a distance of 201 06 feet, thence North 88°39'44" West a distance of 10 O1 feet, thence South 50°19'42" West a distance of 40 57 feet to a 5/8"by 30" iron rod inscribed "Land Tech", thence North 84°16'09" West a distance of 368 36 feet to a 5/8" by 30" iron rod inscribed"Land Tech", thence South O1°26'14" West a distance of 258 30 feet to a 5/8" by 30" iron rod inscnbed "Land Tech", then North 88°50'02" West a distance of 45 03 feet to a 5/8" by 30" iron rod mscnbed"Land Tech, thence North O 1°26'14" East a distance of 384 08 feet to the imtial point \\�I��\�+uil.\uwrn��konliduiti+I�APRIL\I AItGC'TAS\I'ANNO(.RK\tannocrl.�cr\exa doc - - �wV�V�L�ILV ��2 c,aN�ca�e � ►,�h #4 PF�OF�c^10P �L Parnanro cwECav 9�szs �P}�.� E. p ' � ` (.ribJJ 791-9J9B J ry (FAXJ 791-iolJ R L G JV !85 C �01Y�10010�111?�AlopPin9�Cu�rmt dlqos�1117PP2- Leflerdrg �C � JANIAAAY 19,18�i � 20 FOOT EASEMENT FOR E�WWARD Kli�'a PHBPS CONSTRUCAON OF AN � OIiERFLOW CHANN£L AS PER DOCUMENT NO 89-01856 '�P��C�'S �z 3�-O� eT+ - SOObS'S8"W 384 08' S� �=so' , 4�2s 0 0 — — — — — — — _ — — _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ �ry 30 FOOT SEWER EASEMENT AS PER E - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - B62 PAGE686 S 00OS 58" W 258 JO I o I^ fAS£MENT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF AA I�ERFL OW CHANNEL L 4125 PER DOCUMENT NO 89-01B56 N OOi75 SB"E 90 00 � �O � 7 � � � PARCEL 1 � � � 981B3 SF q � � � PARCEL 2 � ' 77 289 SF � � • � � � � q � � d n DOCUA/E-NT�yp gy_��85P0 ��a ' . ti ` `ro CITY G�TiG-�. U `��- �'�Nt�{�v�;�NG'��'LE�i�,9G ��` F s >> _ o�, N90 00'00~W ��. S 02 09'00" E 255 66' s��- 10 Ol NO2 09'00°W 20106' — R — ---- — — �,�, 74 A IiENUE R 2003-3115 09/18/02 WED 13:22 FAX 503 797 1792 METRO GENERAL COUNSEL f�001 6 0 0 N O R 7 H E A 5' G N A H D A V E N U E I P O R T L A N D, O R E G O N 9)2 3 I 2 7 3 6 � 7 E L 5 0 3 7 9 7 1 7 0 0 P A X 5 0 3 7 9 7 1 7 9 7 '��:�%�j i �\�ll�'� ,..%�/ Y -'- VIA FACSIMILE 503-684-7297 M E T R O September 18, 2002 Mr. Morgan Tracy Associate Planner City of Tigard—Comxnunity Development 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Mr. Tracy: Re: MLP 2002-00007 As you know, Metro Regional Parks and Greenspaces Department has applied for a Fninor partition to divide a 4.03 acre property, owned by Fanno Creek Acres LLC and known as 2S1 12AC 01200. The partition�vill result in a 2.25 acre parcel on which an office and warehouse is located and vvhich will be retained by Fanno Creelc Acres, LLC (the "Fanrio Creek acres property"} and a 1.77 acre undeveloped z�iparian and upland parcel, which Metro will later acquire (the"Metro property."). Metro Regional Parks and Greenspaces Department has confirmed with the owner of the subject site that a dedication of an additional five feet(5') of right of way along that portion of the subject site fronta.ge where the public right of way extends only twenty feet (20') fi•om the existing center line would be acceptable. Metro iherefore proposed that such five feet(5')�right of way be dedicated and set forth on the recorded partition plat. If you have any questians, please contact April Olbrich, Metro Senior Legal Assistant, 503-797-1548. Sincerel , Joel E on Seni Assista.ut Counsel ro Office of General Counsel Cc: Gale Nelson, Fanno Creek Acres LLC Williazn Eadie, Metro Open Spaces Acquisition Recyclyd Pape+ www.mavo-roplo�.org 700 �9� +eo� 09/18/02 WED 13 22 FAX 503 797 1792 METRO GENERAL COUNSEL f�002 Aprtl Olbnch, Metro Sr Legal Assistant M\attomey\confidentialWPRILITARGETAS�FANNOCTtK\fannocrkacrltigruwdedltl doc