Loading...
CU3-75 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. .."14 EL":1 400 ROBERT r.EOFFLENDYER Conditional Use (Cu 3-75) Tigard Industrial Park •. • •;,' 4 • • • • • .• • • • •. • March 11, 1975 Robert D. Tofflemoyer 5205 OW Watson Beaverton, Oregon 97005 Reference: File No. CU 3-75 Tigard Industrial Park Wood Stove - . Dear Mr. Tofflemeyer: This letter officially notteies you that your request for a Conditional Use permit for a wood stove fabricating process in an M-4 gone (Tigard Industrial Park) was approved by the Ti6ard Planning Commission on February 15, 1975. Please feel free to contact this office at 639-4171 if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, • Jerald M. Powell, Assoc, AlP JMP:ps .') , • . • • - 9 5 „. MINUTES TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION . February 18, 1975 Twality Junior High School - Lecture Room 14650 SW 97th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon 1. CALL TO ORDER - The meeting was called to order. at 7:35 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL - All members were present and staff members Bolen and Powell 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the January 28, 1975, and February 4, 1975, meetings were considered. The minutes of the January 28, 1975, meeting were amended to show that George Penrose of NPO #1 and Commissioner Alan Popp were present. • 4. PUBLIC HEARING ,• 4.1 'Conditional Use - CU 2-75, CU 3-75, CU 4-75 All above located in Tigard Industrial Park, an M-4 (industrial park) site on SW Tigard Ave. A. Staff Findings 1. Powell presented the staff findings pointing out that all three conditional uses are inihe same industrial park and have therefore been grouped into one staff report. Testimony and Commission Action in the following minutes are separated into separate requests. B. Public Testimony - Stardrill Co. 1. Bob Steuben of Stardrill described his company's operation saying that they supply well drilling rigs and components to operators. He said the used rigs, which have been stored on the premises, are in the process of being repaired and resold. This was said to be their busiest time of the year and it is rare that 5 used vehicles will be stored at one time. It was stated that :Lhe Stardrill Co. , with the co- operation of the industrial park owner, would be willing to provide a screened area for well drilling equipment. 2. Joe Schulty, from SW Johnson St. and across Fanno Creek from the proposed use, stated his opposition to allowing the outside storage of vehicles in that the property abuts a residential area. 3. Roy Shaw of 10005 SW Johnson also stated his opposition to the request saying that anything which makes additional . . • ::: y N • v noise for the residential area he founu objectionable. , C. Staff Recommendation w` 1. Staff recommended approval of the use with storage area to ,1 be provided screening the sight of stored vehicles and as approved by the Design Review Board. . „.. D. Commission Discussion and Action 1. Ball stated that the applicant had not attempted to meet • ' the burden required by "Fasano" .and the request should be denied. When asked what particular item should have been ` addressed, Ball replied that the applicant had not in any way shown that his requested outside storage would not be detri- , mental to adjacent residential uses. J 2. Hansen said that he could vote to approve the wholesale distribution use, but not the proposed outside storage. 44 3. Ball moved to deny the conditional use request, Hartman seconded and the motion passed by majority vote with Popp, Hansen, Nicoli and Whittaker voting no. c. 4. Popp queried the other commissioners as to whether their vote meant they disapproved both outside storage and wholesale . �,`; distribution. '., 5. Ball responded that the reason for his motion was that the ,".. applicant had not provided the proper burden of proof, not because he necessarily disapproved of the request. But, ` in order to approve the request he would need more inforr mation than the applicant had made available at the hearing. � B. Public Testimony - Wood Stove 1 .. " 1. Mr. Tofflemeyer described his Wood Stove fabricating process e. and stated there would be no outside storage nor would noise 1 4 levels exceed acceptable standards, N Y C 2. No one spoke in opposition to this request. C. Staff Recommendation 1. Staff recommended approval of the request. D. Commission Discussion and Action . 1. Po pp moved for approval of the e re q oast and Hartman econded. , The commission vote was unanimous on the motion. • • B. Public Testimony - Truce-Door . :y 1. This item was tabled to the next meeting because the a:ppli- cant was not present to present his cased Moved Wakem, seconded Popp, vote unanimous. PC Minutes - 2/1S/75 -- page 2 a r- .6,, f.l.eS .. . IffiP•L'i76:Tt+`�'w1M"S"+aSaA%,+ mM--.+...."•T'^'-�.:iP - - _ •i*...^".'h ,yl . A .I.. .. -I.tl . _ .. ♦. ` '� ., ` n / /, y' r, R+ • , e yr, 4.2 Minor Land Partitioning - MLP 1-75 Partitioning a C-3 zoned parcel on SW Paci is Hwy. into 3 parcels a.. for the purpose of leasing land to individual developers. A. Staff Findings I. Bolen presented the staff findings which described the proposed lot areas and means of providing access. B. Public Testimony 1. Mr. Jack Robertson, the ,property owner, spoke for his request stating that he had already signed a 21 year lease with the McDonalds Restaurant Corp. and he wished the commission to permit the partitioning so a building permit could be issued. In addition' he said that there had been some discussion of not allowing McDonalds to use School St. as an access point and he said that this is a public through way and they should have the right to utilize it for access. y 2. Larry Haugset, the realtor, asked the commission not to deny access to School St. , but rather to leave this issue to the Y Design Review Board who were responsible for reviewing the site development plan. 3. Cliff Ashley, NPO #1 Chairman, said that he was speaking as , ;.r a private citizen and that he was concerned that the pro- , • posed McDonalds is incompatible with other uses in the area ... such as the School site, that tremendous amounts of traffic ,; ,';.. would be generated and the site configuration just didn t t seem to lend itself to this intense of a use. `, C. Staff Recommendation 1 Staff 1. Staff recc mmended approval of the a licant t s request with. the condit.ton that 5p ft. be dedicated to Grant Ave. and that access be provided to lot °Bit from Pacific Hwy. only. J is D. Commission Discussion and Action 1. Hartman stated that access should not be denied to School N St. but possibly should send recommendation to the Design Review Board that this be considered, 1. 2. Popp moved thet the request be approved with the following conditions: ve a. that 5 ft. be dedicated to Grant St. b. that no entranceway be made to School St. The motion died for lack of a second. 3. Hartman moved to approve with the recommendation that 5 ft. ,.1 be dedicated to Grant St. and a recommendation be sent to PC Minutes - 2/18/75 - page 3 `. 4 ;-+w.. v , .......n.rT«a w efw.r ,,y,.r...:.-1..YS.........,.,.>...}...,..........,.+,,,, .,ar..:».,, ..1.,— .x- - 5..........r— M, tij . P• . • • the Design Review Hoard that access not be allowed to School St. (if legally feasible) . Popp seconded the the motion. 4. Sakata stated her concern that joint access with the station not be allowed. .. , J. 5. Porter stated his concern that to partition the property to allow the development of a McDonalds Restaurant at the location adjacent, a school site would be a safety hazard due to the high traffic volumes generated by such a use. He continued saying that the "purpose" section of the sub-- division code requires the commission to consider public safety when approving subdivisions and partitions. He then stated thatsin opposition to allowing this partitioning . .. a for the McD onalds u se '.n that it would jeopardize the public safety. 6. The commission voted on Hartman's motion and it passed by a majority vote with Porter voting nay. , . 4.3 Est blishment of a Planned Development District and a Zone . Change (ZC 5-j75) changing an R-7 zoned parcel on SW 98th Ave. soth of Greenburg Rd. to A-2 (PD) . A. Staff Findings • 1. Powell presented the staff findings relevant to this case C , pointing out that it conforms with both the Tigard Community Plan and the NPO #2 Plan. D. Public Testimony 1. Pat.Thomas, the project planner, presented this proposal to , the commission addressing the various Fasano items and pointed out that the proposed density will be 7.7 dwelling f: units per acre, below the 12 dwelling units allowed in the adopted plan. i 2. There was no one present to speak in opposition to the request. i r C. Staff Recommendation 1. Staff recommended approval of the request with the conditions • ti that ) a. If the PD is not implemented, it will revert to the R-7 zoning. b. The owner dedicate 10 ft. right-of-way to SW 98th and sign an agreement to participate in a Local Improvement .,{ District. c, Variances be permitted as stipulated in the applicant's submitted planning program. e , { PC Minutes - 2/18/75 - page 4 j l .. d. That density be controlled by the site development ```QQQiii��y����(�(�({{{ plan which specifies 7.7 dwelling units per acre. . . Y 1 :. D. Commission Discussion. and Action '' 1. Whittaker pointed out that this site is less than the mini- mum specified for a planned development in the City's code which is 4 acres; however, as he pointed out, the Planning ._ �. Commission does have the capability to consider PD's of 3 less than 4 acres if it so desires. He then asked the commissioners if they agreed that this proposal does merit being considered. The commissioners did concur that the proposal does have merit. - - 2. Mall said he wanted to see the density of 7.7 dwelling units per acre attached to the PD and asked the applicant, Mr. Scott, if he agreed to this density restriction. Mr. Scott replied that he did agree to this density. 3, Hansen moved to approve the zone change from R-7 to A-2, r , with the submitted PD, based upon the staff findings and including the staff conditions with the exception that the density be based on 7.7 dwelling units per acre and not " ti according to the depiction on the a e site plan and with the additional condition that a maintenance agreement be required for areas to be held in common ownership. Mall seconded the motion and it passed by unanimous vote. 4.4 Recommending Amendment of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan for the area known as NPO #1 (CPR. 1-75) A. Staff Findings 1. Bolen presented the staff findings for this item which in- `Y in- cluded a summary of the joint meeting between the NPO #1 and the Planning Commission. He pointed oat that using the resolution of the City Council which specified certain concerns and testimony which had. been offered at previous plan was dis- meetings a revised plan was developed. This p • played in graphic form for everyone at the meeting and Bolen pointed out the changes from the previous plan. B. Public Testimony t ' ` 1. Chuck Stearns said that the existing n g frontage road on Pacific Hwy. should remain and should hook into the highway ,) for easy access. Y 2. Craig Eagleson, owner of Farm Craft Chemicals on Commercial St. , presented two maps that he had prepared for the ' commission showing the one being proposed and the land use pattern that industrial shown, included his arcelaash the oonly lindustrial par el on Commercial St. .,, He then presented a history of his pbusiness. Y PC Minutes - 2/18/75 - page 5 . r 14 1.• 1114 • • .p R • 3. Chuck Stearns spoke again stating that the proposed change from C-3, general commercial, to C-P, commercial-professional, would take value from his property. 4. Fred Olson, who lives on the Frontage Rd. , stated his oppo- sition to the proposed C-P uses and said that there' are already four lots with C--3 uses in the area so proposed. 5. Jess Mason, a realtor representing Mr. Olson, asked the commission to be objective and to see a change from C-3 ' to C-P as a "down" zoning. He then stated his belief that the property cannot be marketed as C-P in that no demand ., exists. 6. Cliff Ashley, NPO #1 Chairman, pointed out to the commission that this reconsideration had come about because the means to accomplish the plan's objectives were not acceptable to the Council. He then asked the commission to again con- sider plan objectives, especially in terms of controlling • strip commercial bdevelopmentsonc the lhighway and to see if the strip means were not appropriate. He concluded that hat more plans are zoning p ressure than zoning is changed by planning pressure. n• C. Staff Recommendation 1. Staff recommended that the revised lan be adopted. p p D. Commission Discussion and Action 1. Hartman stated his support for the Commercial-Professional proposed use on the highway and his feeling that the staff findings had shown that a definite community interest exists to control.' continued strip commercial development on the highway. 2. Hansen stated his concern that NPOrs do not actually deal with the real problem of traffic congestion on the highway. 3. Nicoli stated his agreement with Hartman that the area shown for Commercial-Professional uses on the highway is in the community interest but said that Farm Craft should remain in an industrial zone, 4 Hartman stated his agreement with Nicoli in that Farm Craft ,) should remain industrial. 5. Wakem said that commercial zoning on Comme;^cial St. met the plan objectives and should therefore be recognized. 6. In response to a statement leaving Farmcraft zoned industrial and zoning the other parcels commercial would result in spot zoning, Ball replied that the issue is not spot zoning, but PC Minutes - 2/18/75 * page 6 4 yar»n+rns•1 TF '6iaaeawwTaiA +!+ w a , . , w, • , , . .. . rather the functional relationship of Commercial St. to , Main St. The commission should be applying land planning criteria to this matter and if they were, this would lead them to the conclusion that commercial zoning is appropriate. •...k . 7. Hartman moved to adopt the revision for Burnham Street and leave Commercial St. designated for commercial use and Ball , seconded. . . 8. Hansen moved to leave Commercial St. in industrial zoning , and Nicoli seconded. The motion lost by a majority vote. --- 9. The commission then voted on Hartman's motion with the majority voting yes and Nicoli voting no. 10. Wakem then moved to adopt the revision which would make all of the Buchholz property retail-commercial. Hartman seconded and the motion passed by unanimous vote. • •. 11. Popp said that in the frontage road portion of the highway he would like to see the frontage road connected with the . new street proposed to go from Pacific Hwy. at the point of ' the Heinz Repair Shop back to Ash Avenue connected. In • addition he said that he recognized that there might be some loss of property value with the proposed commercial professional use, but that this was definitely within the 1' , public interest and was therefore in favor of it. He then made a motion that the frontage road be connected on the south to provide the safest connection possible with the • proposed new street. Sakata seconded and the motion passed 4 , by unanimous vote. 12. The commission next discussed the best type of proposed I zoning to deal with the problem of strip commercial develop- ment, '.. . 13. Porter suggested that the commission should construct an entirely new zone applicable specifically to Pacific Hwy. to protect the hwy. as much as possible from uses which would be detrimental to it. 14. Ball moved that the plan be accepted with the proposed ' 0 commercial-professional uses in the frontage woad portion of Pacific Hwy. Popp seconded stating that possibly the C-P zone is somewhat restrictive but that it does provide a proper type of zoning for this area until a possibly refined type of zone as suggested by Porter could be developed. , 15. The commission voted on Ball 's motion and it passed by • , majority vote with Hansen, Porter and Nicoll voting no. . . i 4,5 Zone Change (Z0 11-74) changing the zoning map in that area .,, known as NPO #1 to conform to the Comprehensive Plan. . • PC Minutes - 2/18/75 - page 7 fr. • • • • A. Staff Findings 1. Bolen presented the staff findings pointing out that the proposed changes do conform to the revised NPO #1 plan. B. Public Testimony 1. No testimony was given on this item. C. Staff Recommendation 1. Staff recommended that the zoning be adopted as conforming to the revised plan. D. Commission Discussion and Action • 1. Hartman moved that the zoning be changed to conform to the amended NPO #1 plan. Wakem seconded and the motion passed by majority vote with Hansen voting no and Porter abstaining. • 5. OTHER BUSINESS - There was no other business. 6. ADJOURNMENT - The meeting was adjourned at 11:45 p.m. V PC Minutes - 2/18/75 - page 8 , . tu., 3 c TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report February 18, 1975 Agenda Item 4.1 CU 2-75, CU 3-75, CU 4-75 . Conditional Use af-portions of an M-4 zoned site known as Tigard Industrial Park (tax map 2S1 2BA, tax lot 300) Applicants Stardrill Co. Robert Stuben) - CU 2-75 Wood Stove Robert Tofflemoyer) - CU 3-75 Trudoor, Inc. Darren Dodson) - CU 4-75 1, A an*....221agEt t117:fwilt:lee::111:s:::t:irbo:t11::111 • fabrication of metal appliances (including welding) and, a patented wood stove (Wood Stove) ; and assembly of pre-hung doo units in an M-4 zoned industrial park (Tigard Industrial Park) . Staff Findings 1. Tigard Industrial Park is presently 75-80% developed. Site design of the industrial park itself is subject to Design Review, Overall site planning has therefor been previously addressed. 2. "Trudoor" and "Wood Stove" will apparently share some common facilities. Some conflict may exist between occu- pancy classifications which should be addressed by the applicants. 3. No appreciable impact on traffic generation of the in- dustrial park or on circulation within the park is antici- pated. 4. Adequate parking appears to be provided although some con- ' .) flict is possible with the anticipated development of Tigard III which will introduce new construction adjacent to the "Trudoor" and "Wood Stove" sites. 5 . Stardrill Co. has a present existing problem with provision of acceptable outside storage of heavy equipment which they base on the site. Their prominant location at the entrance to the industrial park contributes to the problem if they continue to store their equipment in its present usual location. • 6. Chapter 18.52.060 requires that all permitted outside storage be screened by a sight obscuring fence at least 6 ft. high. Stardrill has been notified of this require- ment and has indicated its willingness to work out a re- asonable solution. 7. All three activities appear compatible with the design and present occupancy of the project with the possible ex- ception of the reservation cited by staff in finding #2 of this report. 8. The present uses in the industrial park, the conditional uses proposed and the park conf,Qrm O. present zoning and to the Tigard Community Plan. N. P. 0. #2 's proposed Plan agrees also. Present land use in the vicinity of the industrial park is residential, but has also been desig- nated as future industrial in the Tigard Community Plan. 9. The cumulative effect of these conditional use requests will not affect the impact of the industrial park on the community and do not appear to generate additional impacts of their own. 10. No increase in demand for public services or other impact on public services will result from these activities. Staff Recommendations to be made after public testimony has been heard and the hearing closes PC Staff Report February 18) 1975 item 4.1 - page 2 .. Ar3DM?q,+ m,na, wr eu e, ..:,,,..,:.._$_"'w-•.-.._ +.,..,+.w. ;...;.,, ,.,.,'.,--...�..-.-rte.. ..... - .r....w;,,;mn. � J 4 , 1681•.�.,;. ,." BR 9 S•W, KATHERINE S T,r _.a�. 0 , _ •� B H I -- rel//, 41111b. '1)., ,......,„ . . , II loot il I 1/4,-4),■'.,0 i D X // D ,� k ,,� .� 65108 , /....,y - ti . ,.. . . k . 411.0,....,„. ,.,..,,1",,,,,, .•. /60 I // i II/60 5>'''' ��� G i / // ‘II 5,..-floo - _ v ii 0/4) t' iiiii It M,F1. 4)00aSittil°%. 4' // / a quill la 4 .:', 0 /50 'o' C.8, I, / *JP ,- k� o` . ,� . ■ 1..111 r11 . ,,• 150...,_,......� ► 1 �' 1 14812 \ a ► , -- ; 150,5 �,,` i. 148.2 , \ 1 k X \ % PILL ..• -, ``.- •('1 4................2_R EA /r 1 717 149,5 I Ivy ---4 K,--.,,,�, r 4812 " Itk 147.5 ,E MIHI \.s. s.',. •„1; ,' $ SiiiHs‘ ......-41.-.- BRUSH ibilik:. 4 • .. 4 11 • • -may `I•: 1 • '. -,.�,-r•-7«w.sww+ .T+K..r*^r+ar+wy.••-rn......�...,.,.'"^t'r"+xat#g=-;t' -.` w.-�±..•�s.v.+•..�.-v.-. . , ...,.....,....,,�ti � .\ . - e y. ,fi!'. i 4 t.+. j-. I�1 Y 1 1/"t.. + Y, ', -_ ....1 .. .. , 0 ..i r-----,,0 4,,,,„...? .-J,.. tii 3 . . . , .... , -. ..... .. b,...... ,.,.:„,...,. , . --‘... ....— .-.." ..„ % }, ' 11 .w�"'•'�- • • 100 : ::•'.'4•'.;•,'•,• ;", .'•tee , ), ,,,,,.„...0 5,00 10° ....W.'A..'41.1::::::::••:::::::::■::::::*•:17', 43 , © ! w ;:�;:L"+,•i::;;•;.;:;5;:::.:; .;4;: ::5;. a ::•;.,.,.". i":.�"::,§..L•s'3 ...... isr a. '� °. ♦ .. ;� •5+,; ;ti;.,:4:5�:: •';L:•L• � '"';;a; ;.•r , 1i ,:,. ,\7 •::5;:•SL•Li;S S•"S':•',•.�:�\" y, M .,SSi i '`',�• .ii'':n�+.S LS�•�i•:LS•:•:SS•S•�:S"•S SS:%•:•LS`ry+ {1 •.,'.. • y ,::%.::: y::;S Si:�i:` •,�} 'S•i S::: �•' ::•:•.5y.:: •' ::5: ::•":::�::LS•::::L:S" r, t"' ,, w.-,. •S,'.•S•S':L:%::;SL,'.SSS.;S.LS;:;:;:•5,�.�;t;S ::�:: :yS• •.••• •.•• 'S:• 1 :�ti Q�/y"�I�j ,',�]-,,�y�+r • ' ''• � :;:•;.•:;:+•:•:•1 ;;�;,5.5,;,;, ys •:;"•",,::.•;;;,r�i:S .:V;•::;i:;•S:•,•::•L:::':i,•SS:;::::::•::i::S: :�;:L:+S: S::::L:Li':•:•i•::•:•:••':•*•'S,"* Y j --•"'!i A' L:V CC..�;;i:,LAS"S:iiS•i:':i::.:** : • . \ 1 A f OTK'S OF hAARING CITY OF RD ' .a AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION.ICATION 7y) 1 PLANNING COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that public g hearings`will be held by the Planning STATE OF OREGON, S Commission of the City of Tigard in the' COUNTY Or WASHINGTON, Twality Junior High School Lecture z. Room,19650 S.W.97th Avenue,Tigard, 'Oregon. Said hearin s w _ A_., ill occur February 18, 1$�75�at'8: M� •J . - ...:.r-�..t•iJJMJJ P.M.and ,c air.ex J:JJ.JJJ M...J........J..J..._...�. wvoild" I. .................J...J............. ri ��ll�.�� concern the following:•.. " .., Req esi by Sta p}fo . being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the publisher .JJ...J—.-- _,,ti, , ,,, r *permit;.. - p y ,lr a, `� gale distribution snal'out ide st rake Q 1 ' of The Tigard Times, a newspaper of general circulation, as defined _.. sale Industrial Park zoned site to eked 0 and 198.020, published at Tigard, in the aforesaid county and at 9806 S.W.Tigard Avenue(Tigard In Y , by OttS 193,01 dustrial Pa�rlt)._ Request by Rt D. Toffiemoyer for a State; that the legal notice, a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was conditional use permit to allow fabrics- tion and distribution of metal stoves, successive and on a M-4,Industrial Park zoned site lo- published in the entire issue of said newspaper for ..J....J.- —•�- -� cated at 9806 S.W. Tigard Avenue p (Tigard Industrial Park). consecutive weeks in the following issues N J`""".�"�"`"`�� Request by'.TruDoor Inc.for a rondi , tional use permit to allow assembly of .J.J..a J� J.....«...r..+..J.J`•tJ`w .h o i on a - ....,..,,JJ...._.....J�J pre.hung door units M-4,Industri JJ.J.._ sk318"3r_.9,...$6.4,31.....1.97.5 . r1 al Park zoned site located at 9806 S.W. _ et2it„....",...1 •.-w Tigard Avenue r(Tigard 'Industrial (Sig attire) Park):.. . . • . Request by George Scott for a zone • change of Tax Lot 1000 and part of Tau . `�h day of .........J. Lot 1001, Map 1S1 35CD, located'.ap- • Subscribed and sworn to before me this :.....».-....�--.--...- Jw proximately 500 feet south of Green- burg Road on S.W. 98th Avenue from !,e'b :u ••••»....••.. 19.15' R-Consideration of Neighborhood hood Plan.iFs #1 for the Ash Avenue-Downtown I� / ,Area.The affected area is bounded by 1? `""""'w Notary Public of Oregon Pacific Highway, Hall Blvd. and Mc- Donald Street.The proposed plan is a revision of the Plan for this area which i �.. L. ..... 1 .; i" Was adopted by the Tigard City Coon My commission expires J..J..r». .._...�. .. , 74. "��� • To reclassify certain lands within the • ..� cii on May 2 lf1 boundaries of, NPQ Plan #1, being bounded by Pacific Highway,Hall Doti. . levard do the comprehensive Donald Avenue,to cony plan for the . area which will be considered 'as the . previous agenda item, . All persons having an interest in these matters are invited to attend and be h . . , . ' (TT 2270 -- Publish Feb.9'�1975), N t1 Y I i 1" a , . J t , w• • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON County of Washington ss: City of Tigard I, Patricia Samuelrich, being first duly sworn, on oath depose and say: That I am Secretary for the Planning Department for the City of Tigard, Oregon. That I served notice of hearing of the Tigard Planning • Commission of which the attached is a copy (Marked Exhibit A) upon each of the 1�71ow'iby mailing etooeachnofhthem1ah day of February following persons at the address shown on the • • attached list (Mrked Exhibit B), said notice as hereto attached, deposited in the United States Mail on the 11th day of February , 1975, postage prepaid: Al 41 Subscribed and sworn to before me on this 11th day of Februa x`y , 1975 : Notary Pub . c of Oregon /(- My commission expires: . `� .. • , - I . . ,. . , * , • . . . . , . . ‘ volioc i\ . • BLic tA r Pu issigii4 fllanni99 I, %\ . , „ . OW—gt /3 the . AVO PLA held bY , heal fIG "411 be ..A4,41 Do 1 ,..ur . 0. c,,... on 1,\A • cii/ or ,I.:4:::::9:77.":. 3uni.or 11.'" 5 Ull •• 4- nUbli " b Tuall'tY id , the,, , v.4 a11 t e Said lowing° 1\ * . by given P Tigar' d Orag°1/• the Cal is her° city 0, Tiger 1 ,1 concern ertnit-.., to allou h ' Notio9 f the ,t1 rotonua. ion a s 7 via an ditionaL use PIndustrial Parlt • COmMi5 A650 S.V6 9 T'i, 0:00 P• a canrsoe on n-4, rd Indwarial , 1,4 .,975 a v for ,\ , . . Boom, " 8 1. (Ia . 1 ,r 8 b r'l•-•a•r Y stardrill COMPOli t 'de st° nue And 00 sl . Ave uho t ibtY0 localboudi-,A., 9806 sektl. Ti'°ara 3.100. . . Reques distr tt to 8 . * lesal0 t 51, pOrM- d trial foreindttotogloaam,..4, Inclutadustriel . . zoned 8 co- Iprt"aa (ligar n , ' park). -r 5 fflet6c3Y . AklEinu • 1,1. ligar t by R• 0* cjpstributic'n ° ..(es A...d at 98°6 5'- lyou . flag- tion an a 1 10 ca.- it t° 3 ed ' . - fabricca od si.te perm zon - . ParAltIn "a trial Par V). 4 11 al or a cand5.t.:-1;-to Induad indwatri'l 1 Par ' ,..„ parie .... 1 . gi ar ,. tiotIticst bY firptirjr.abrunig:cdse°:?... lgtasrdu (.1. 1/4 oc. , • bl-Y ° ..t 960 „: asscra , d a ....,......_ it :. Bito 3-pca ' ,,,,,.........--, ,... \ • , .-,,,i 0 s ..-------- ....10.0N., • --..,...,„„..., . ...fr Roll I ,........ V....V.V.V...V.V.W...V..... .7 • WO ..,..1. „...t 0 i ....,":....•-...--"" ' :::::::::::::;VV.VIVNAV...1ps,..,_ S 40 \' t.r., a 1 At v , ,o, 200 A •.3.$.•,.:............g kt:•g•...*i.:,.•.......0.,g',.....g..;'.4:•.:..,.t..:I...0.•;"A‘....;.,,,,7'7 c t*,.....t.• ''e 2 44 A.1 • .,t 4 Ie..,"' ..."' al, t I $:NA.V.••••;?:ii.:MA:kk'.S.A....:•••::•Ii•:.'....SI,VP•• •,...1,V**St..14V.,Wel0, 4 '1112'.• \ a ::# '••:;:••••"%,.•.:.•41-4.‘•:0••••••••••••NV:.*:,%W.,,:p$,i",•:::v.-:::::::::.:.*.w.:::.v,...,..a„.440,..!.. 1... .ot t 1 • :; ';"?..11:;r::::Ct?'Sfti•A■OZ*FAc.....1:0;§:::::::,:',..1:::::•,..A4F„:.'3:::N...:::::V•14,...•(;:.4,41,.. CC 0 :• 1'W . 7...ile://: .a k•,...1.„,,,t. I.t ••'..4. ....; :..8. -,......z.5....AN...........x...v............m...,....„.................,..„...N,............„..,.........0,4%.....*:::,...55 0 A..'...0:1■3'..,..F(.......AMY•Fig A`F.***1.4*.••■•••.e.:::::::•.$.41*.::::.0.4 L) ,kki " /4-* , ‘4 •••-• ni::::::',:k'Sf.::•","::::,•:::::'4..AS:4•Tg.K.:44•::::: •'.4.11,...;:-,..,...VMS,:$,.*:. i .t K)1..., . , •-""'‘...-, ,...**&;$4:11:00:-,i'.•:41k:F A.;::::$' .../.....A,...,,,....,..5:::,.....*,..,,,,r. , ..,. ..ft................V.:s........vs.,...-2,.......v t-....wv..*:1:1'......0'..40:..........;s::::::,.....:*• i -L., I -) . •"' - .,...'1..k......,.......t.',' ,44.4.'%A.::.5‘?.::::.1......„.211...,...Y.',...\'''S.■'FS.: .:'..,•;;;;":4,:,::12.:1,..Z.....V1,...;:.%*,A. li.1 . 0 IN,'06 t/'*'..;■......y:,..Y.......'.:,.4'....553::::.g.Z.:§..:Z.',:,..,■:,.....,,,*!• ,. '.',.. * :e4:1.:0.',...k..tg.,.....sigii.:05.t.t.i...,•,...4:0 I ., • . 0, -, ,,e,,er- witt..§.,.......15:i.o...§..z..,4::::::::............... .§.....i.iz..............g.:t..t.:4::::::::.....v....... .........:41...... ...../.i.5..:o.......f......A.."...::::::::::::§............5...k.:::?........:41.5:0......s...:?.... ,.4 . 4. \ ..,, .... .....:,.... ..........,...:.,.L,,..*-$.4......,x,....../.....sy..........4...,..,......i::::::... .........,;., ,,:,...,:,,„,....................?,.............0,..y.o..........z.§........,.... ....:*4......z,................x............ ,.... .:,, 4, ,,,,...,...wo...,....v.....,......v...v.i.W*,...v.w......, ... ...., 409 '"14.4:,.t'VA':'?:::'•t':::::Z:::::t ;.M.'..4 V::Si,,N..*::::::::■'::A::/•••••T',:::,l.X.S.;:n•,:-S:,...V,O.V..$.• to 0 ' I' 4 .6 f,..*:,*:::::::•4.M.\\\:"Sii-4.s',..k.:§4.::::"Si•KI-Fi:14%'n.A.,:-44W-://:::',$.:::NA':, PAHA..1.F:.M41,..X.',V:4;;A:s.F.•.:.? 4);at k , 111 '...qq.i.i.g.:Aili$:**::::::.:A..1.:%.***.'1..''`OF:"•:::"'*:•::•?*''''..14.1;111.4 A.:Mk..V..1%.:•••:'...N.......:**•••••••A`:;:::•:::;.;:.'1, s . 400• ' 1,-;•••;q::',..4::',%*::•.•:0•.'••••••".•,\'.P.,'. .0,' -..%•..,,,...........;......:0,-..... ..........,:,..w.-a::I ,...........,.••••.:0AA'rni4,•j ::..4,..•.:0:.•...•......6,":::::.••:...•:::•;.,:;•::::‘•:.....:.•:::.:,..:*:.;•:::.,•.:,,%:::::•::.•,..V:::a• ' ■' t: , .,.....•,..;:s.A0:4,:./......,.:.•::, . • ,......::.%::,.•,:...........;,...w.v..:...ow•:.........0..•,%:.,.%*.•:•.::A.',.*•••••0••••••%0:•:.•.'0.,AA•••••• $1 . . . •,:,.•;;:y......*:::::::::$•;•::•AZ,;*:.::::,,t......,,:a:;.•&:::0::::::0:::•g:;:::::::::::4::::'.•,:t::::::*:••••':::::',511:::$`1::::4'.,',%.•:::•:::::::::::':::::::•.'AM:':::::&•• 6 .„ ---.--i•. 4••••41SA,...::::%':".41::::*••:A5V.V1.0%-%,44::Figi:MV.F.4.1;:::**::::.N;4411.•.'il■SF. A.V.:V,Z".04AY::::::::::::::4':??,44:e0.1-Fi:; W 4.44 4*•4 4 •:',,c+4%*:,:,•••••,VS,::•••••::::,•;*',..■;■.**,..../.•••:-,0•:,:%....•.*0,•.:,....405".........:04.....s.....,.........%-.4.0.,..,.%A.V.,..,%-,.., '*. ...,.,..,,,,,v,,,,,I,,,A.■AO....0 ..,,..%,:.,:o.....‘,.•......',.%v.v.:W.:W.:W.44...,•:,:-•.',W.*:•*.i..._ ■ .1.•.....!„.........• '..4.4.:::;:;.%.1.N...0.0,....0.,,,,,V,....%.,,,,..A.,.........., .0......k,...............V.M.....000%,..":•••••■,....1,14,4,....*.W. "."L'.',/ . V.t..:■$..V. :4,..f.4,.:;:a...A.",...'":":**/**:01AAVVANO*.V tA"::1".....N.:1::::.A0V1,.....::::::::$SSA.,......*VA:::::1.0.::::,■ '.'R . *:*,..V.0.1.§.1",00:11.0116...:::, ::::**110. ::: . ::?./,t . . A r .:::*:::ONY.,.........4::::::A.Az.:*/....'..Pi:?*gAz.w........y..4....:,....t...,..N.,'$.:.....i.........A;:z,:z.......$50.................4.§..........:50.A.§./...§§...: • - -;"eoft...$...weg......:N.,........ .........,,..,.......0....".w.sov.v...*~A....v....p...s.A.::.p......w.,. -46> .4-0,-.....v.:,. .W.**:Noo.%....,Nn, , ..1:..*.v • ot` 44-4'.., ws.40:, Al 0. .‘` *.................4........0:-........g...\\....--.......-*--..... ....as...........s........mv......N.,........v.......,AF.x.4.*.g.s..A. ,,,..;...........v.:,......,.....s04....$0.4.......wAy.w..s........x.s,...*A.....................A.:*....,,,....,,,,.... i NrA, ,, ........s............s......... ................,....*„.....................,.......,,,,,,,,y...................i,s,......4,....,....,,.*,......... 1\ I ,.•.,..,......-0...........................,..,:...,...........,................*,,,,..... ,..1.,...,".......,...,.....,....,„,—„,....„..."..... _ ..t&A,.........,A.:.....:~go,:w..i........:AA.s.,,....4...i.....:0v,.... . • .., _....,_.,,,... t 4 ',...;,.......v.,...... .a*w.... ..i.,.....h.....i.o.. .M..... 7.................................,.........,4,.............N.6::::::.......0....v.........................*...s.: , . •,,6:• •,Arpt......... r y',..:::::. .../......../......,......§...:4&...§........................%:.,..;y&A..;,....v.......v. \. . , ,. it m ..1 4 r t 4 „00 . -...;.14,A.'..,...'..„'.....W.g.1 :.,N▪ .• .......*..A:.:....,v:4,o::.zA,.:'.r.0:.,vA:4t: A......A..w.....,..,.,...i,'A.0ft.•...,.......1...:..04)..n..„...0 S..,„.. Al 4 , 4 5. __t%i _ %i\ 10 a.-o?f? i 2 . ) . i l'ilcot ” - kt . ght,---,,-1 , i , ..:‘ e•••• ''* oya...„.16' • 1 , titi , '-- " *",.. ,I'.2:-.---......„4. I • 4' - • , D . ; t 1-.) /.....,„,, 2A:1 Af' ,,Y'• , 14 4 e ieit, , ■ ■ ' 'lie • .44k, t 11,li '4 , ••' ,...,it , .4.... ,, r• 'A . -,Jo 1 ,,t. pf io - . •, . , i.ii -L.5 . ''''' -04,.„ .,.** Stu' 'e 4 4 •••• or ' 0,112 * .1., . . I 1/4.4...,__1 ., , - . .. -.#I ' r •D 1- / •,.t,.t. ., ,,,,,Jo,. • 0 • . .07*.1u ,..1,ejo. I I: .-..4,, ot.i,p0.4.4: ....,y,..ah49.4. 0 attend and • •,...4, .. , 4' • e , •+,, ....,,, ,..,„, A...ad t atr 4 102 ,tV4. , i el Os"4"' 4"41",T* ,s * '' .,,...,i5_, . ord '."" ...1..txta • 4 . .• r Clat In. t hbad M a L' eier°rIntl htIVIA1 °4 irltV . r A, '' 130 1133Vw 1, . . • r I I 111111=1111111 . MOM= - 3' --d' '-. '1-1-a 1 7 Ilt . liMNI r J I- Ell i , 7 r.. -7.4 Q pda dlp di '4' Ill f/ /V r l0 ov r - MINIM 11111111111M1111 , MIME ME MO • f /-4'% - I ,v D fo7 I I I °° -0 rtf,<°7'S Y.PS V th ) ' i'11 , '- ' ' 1 i 9:�1 00/ 1 I fis m 1 95 000/ [ I ' s1r iy 0017 • .1Q 4177,!0 111111111 °0-17 - IlingENIMER1111 I s12> ' ' ICI I TOE 1.707,4/ ----,,,:za," I 1 '' soh A, -� 'S C ea ` I I Q Li frA3Z.I, 02S OV bill.' 42-j(?Tg Iv- 0.,yP MIR p°5- , ...j- )-74-02,42. 025 aSZL 11.111.11a1MitaiMill ()oh ':',-, MIME I -gz isz „. NOIIVI =ti.fk - - s - . . . • • • • .^ ZONE CHANGE - CONDITIONAL USE - VALIANCE . TEMPORARY USE - NON-CONFORNING USE REQUESTS APPLICATION File —2 r-d /06,cc, • TIGAR,D PLANNING COMMISSION 6 QL P • 12420 S ,40 Main Stttt 97 By FLF.A5F PPINI IN 1 OR TvPP Ac ti con Rt=q1,-;0'' f": , I al'? „ .a/X4r,fr• AK-I 1. .4•.. Ca, Applicant s Name cz.:7 Phc-qe .4,-.A,. A- • . _ . a..AL,* „. 4.„taxa, • App1icai 8 Add' • (5 (Zip) • Owner s Nine OwLervs A•id're s t. S (2ip) •• App i t; Owns?: r :„J „ po-r Ag 4 44.4. •- •• Owner ret.;ogniticn cf appLl' % * : Lt ,,... , , . t--4.-1..7.-M4,44,.,••A_AA -. 4.-1_, • *A_JL • Ai AL_•1.....a.ux _ t -11.4/..A Sig: it o Ow.. r ) • Person resp6nsibl, f ,tipr ; • PROPERTY INVOLVED # Tax- t".(s) . Address Ar4 ,s (Acres) • Existing Buildings (# „a.A a •^1. Aszaa, -slum,. - rA AL 4 . trassk Current Zoning -4.4.4.-4,—.....Couter, tALI Applicant*8 Apt,L-1%,,r108 Propos,A 2,„,ning " / 3/47/f/i. 4.4 44.,,A.• /tic 1.1e, cif e dattk yke j "1/1Sat SUBMISSION REQUIREMEN'rS Ti tLe p "F4rd Rx,411.t.ea,r- pt,r)c2 jir g 1.+1.1p • Tax S t si Plan . ' Alkik