CU14-75 POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
wp{1., �,�y� {..'. .i:': ,..: ' � , ....'1 �•,., .... ... . .,..... � ,,...!L. .. ,. a ,..'4.+.•.0 �r.,... .. , ..J./a .... .. r.�1d.;..S. .... ....;�.. �... in C..
' 1 •� `�
'° 400 TCT SUPPLY COMPANY 4:
Conditional Use (CU 14-75) k 'F°^
12200 SW Main Street
p
0fit.,.
I'•
•w
1• ,
r,"
4
r ,k••
;
• r•
H
Y t+
•
•
•
1 Y
7.
"
. 0
, •
• "P
"4
, .
•' ,
'01 • **
,■• • .
44. '
■ • July 110 1975
•
• t,
Mr. Jerry *Kelly
4468 N, W. Yeon Ave.
Portland, Oregon 97210
. : Reference: File No. CU 14-75 (T*C*T. Supply)
Dear Mr* Kelly:
, •
• ,
Please be advised that the Tigard Planning Commission, at their
July 1, 1975, meeting, 3onsidered your request to allow a retail
auto parts store on a C-3M zoned site located at 12200 S. W0 Main
St. and your request was approved subject to the following recom-
.
mendation:
1. Additional landscaping be provided on the sidewalk lines
and in front of the building*
•
le you have any questions or need additional information, please I ,
do not hesitate to contact this office at 639-4171* ,
'
Sincerely,
•
Jerald MO Powell, Assoc. AXP
m Associate Planner
• JMP:ps
• ,
,
•
••
• I
•
■■
•
'
/ 4 „T
1
•
.
a
4., MINUTES '
:, , Tigard Planning Commission
July 1, 1975
Twality Junior High School - Lecture Room
14650 S. W. 97th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon
„i‘oli, w
1. CALL TO ORDER: DXgrrigawtam;.111)eod.to order by Vice-Chairman
2. ROLL CALL: Members present: Ball, Nicoli, Porter, Sakata,
Smelser and Wakem; staff, Powell
, o Chairman Hartman attended the first portion of the
meeting, but declined to participate as a Corn-
mission member due to a conflict he had which would
require his early departure.
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes of June 17, 1975, were not yet
t ;
available.
, f
. , .
4. COMMUNICATIONS: None
. ' 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
, .
‘ .4
... *, 5.2 Conditional Use CU 12-75 (Colonial Texaco/Charles Dunn)
. ..''.
A request to allow a car washing machine at the Texaco
Station at 11465 SW Pacific Hwy. (tax map 2S1 36AD, tax
lot 5800) . This matter continued from June 17, 1975.
A. Public Testimony (continued)
o Mr. Dunn produced a landscape plan showing restoration
. .
of the site screening fence removed by the adjacent
. , developer and indicated it was his understanding that
the developer would replace the fence after the con-
struction was completed.
,.. :.
B. Staff Recommendation:
,..
, Approval subject to applicant's re-establishing ground
cover to the rear of his site and abatement of the
existing non-conforming signs and trash storage on
, . '. his site.
' . .
C. Commission Discussion and Action
,.
o Commission discussed further the noise problem
they had, forseen in their earlier consideration
■ ,. of this item. They discussed the necessity of
y further landscaping as well as the desirability
of limiting-'the operation to particular hours of
, AN
V operation.
- .
. .
— ' ..• .. EIBMIIIIIMI
, o Motion to approve (Ball) based on the conditions
that:
• 1. Application be submitted to Design Review
Board for review of the traffic flows on
the site.
2. The hours of operation be limited to from
8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. , based on the findings
that so conditioned the project would not
have advel.se effects on the community, would
conform to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan
and would fulfill a community need for the
proposed use.
o Seconded (Nicoli)
o Motion carried unanimously.
5.1 Zone Change ZC 6-75 (Younger & Neu)
A request for an amendment to the Tigard Zoning Map from
R-7, Single Family Residential, to A-2, Multi-Family Resi-
dential, for a 9.05 acre parcel located west of SW Hall
Blvd. , 600 ft. north of Pfaffle.
A. Staff Report
Staff report was read by Powell. Additional graphic
•
materials were explained.
B. Public Testimony
o Neither the applicant nor his representatives
appeared.
o No one appeared in favor.
o Opposed: Property Owner, SW Hall Blvd.
Lee Miller, SW Spruce St.
W. A. Earls, 11185 SW Hall Blvd.
Property Owner, 11165 SW Hall Blvd.
Mr. & Mrs. Charles Widinger, 8850 SW Thorn
John Pickitt, address unknown.
. 4 All the above appeared in opposition to the pro-
posed amendment.
C. Staff Recommendation
Not given.
D. Commission Discussion and Action
o Motion to deny (Ball) based on findings that no
PC Minutes - 7/1/75 - page 2
,;..
" 0
. , .
, . . .
''.1 , •
corroborative testimony had been offered by
applicant and the impact on the neighborhood
1 ,-
appeared great.
'..
o Seconded (Wakem)
•
o Motion carried unanimously.
, •,.
5.3 Conditional Use CU 13-75 (Nine-T-Nire Towing Service/
Gene Dooley)
. , A request to allow placing an automobile storage area behind
the building presently housing the Tigard Library on SW
Main St. (tax map 2S1 2AC, tax lot 1101) . (Continued from
June 17, 1975) .
;
., ....
o Sakata excused herself from this item, declaring she
had a conflict of interest.
•
■ A. Staff Report
Read by Powell. ,.
'
B. Public Hearing
o Mr. Charles McClure, attoryney for the applicant,
, testified as to the service Mr. Dooley. performs .
for the community, the insignificant impact of
the proposed project and the lack of adequate
alternative sights.
C. Staff Recommendation
• •
1
./, o Approval, on conditions that:
. .
1. A redwood slat, 8 ft. cyclone fence be pro-
,
i vided as shown around the storage compound.
• -.
. ,
.. 2. A paved driveway approach be provided and
sufficient space between the building and the
enclosed storage remain to allow future park-
ing.
..,...
. .
D. Commission Discussion and Action
o Ball asked about interference of the fence with
flood plain.
o Staff responded that they felt the fence would not
interfere with the passage of flood waters.
,-.
o Nicoli said he thought the driveway approach was
ok without paving.
. .
o Motion to approve (Nicoli) .
PC Minutes - 7/1/75 - page '3 . .
.
...--,- --,----- r,. 7--,--- 554 ,
o Ball asked Nicoli if he would amend his motion to
put a two year time restriction on the conditional
use with a Planning Commission review to be held
at the end of that period of time.
o Nicoli said he was agreeable to the amendment.
o Seconded (Ball) .
o Wakem said that he felt this conditional use was
not within the intent of the N.P.O. #1 Plan, as
adopted by the C:ity Council as part of the Com-
. .
prehensive Plan, and he felt the policy statement,
which spoke to the need to improve the Main St.
business area, was violated by this action.
%. ,
o Question called by Nicoli.
o Motion failed 3-2 (Wakem, Smelser, Hansen voting
against) .
o Chairman Porter indicated that he felt unconvinced
of the adverse impact of the project.
o Mr. McClure told the Commission that he felt that
Hansen should have disqualified himself in the
voting and asked if the Commission would reconsider
its vote.
o Porter indicated that disqualification, in fairness,
is a matter up to the individual Commission member
and that the question had been defeated.
5.4 Conditional Use CU 14-75 (TCT Supply Co. )
A request to allow a retail auto parts store on a C-3M
zoned site located at 12200 SW Main St. (formerly Haney
Magnavox) .
A. Staff Report
t, Read by Powell
B. Public Testimony
o Alan Holcombe appeared for Doug Martel, the appli-
",',/ cant, and spoke in support of the project and
addressed the required conformance questions
after oPasanou.
C. Staff Recommendation
Staff recommended approval subject to provision of
additional landscaping on the sidelotOk lines and in
front of the building. kt
,„ PC Minutes - 7/1/75 - page 4
.1 c
, .
14 .
D. Commission Discussion and Action
o Motion for approval (Ball) per staff recommendations.
o Seconded (Wakem) .
o Motion carried unanimously.
6. SUBDIVISIONS
1, 6.1 MLP 4-75 (Sabre Construction Co./S. W. Landmark Lane)
An application to allow the partitioning of a part of tax
lot 600, NE 1/4 of section 12, Township 2S, Range 1 West,
W. M. , located at the end of SW Landmark Lane, west of 72nd
. . Ave. (tax lot 600, tax map 2S1 12A) .
,..
,..,
A. Staff Report ,
Read by Powell. Location of the proposed partitioning
pointed out on display Amps provided for that purpose.
'. , .
B. Public Testimony
.., o Mike McGee, Sabre Construction Co. , explained the
need for a minor land partitioning to accommodate
a new project.,
o No one spoke in opposition.
' . .
C. Staff Recommendation
Approval on condition that the remaining conditions
,.
of Landmark Lane major land partition be satisfied.
. , D. Commission Discussion and Action
. .,
o Motion to approve (Hansen) subject to staff
,
, recommendation.
l' o Seconded (Smelser) ,
o Motion carried un-nimously.
: .
-
7. SIGN CODE APPEAL SCA 1-75 (Lincoln Properties)
A request for an extension of a 90 day permit for an oversized
real estate sign located adjacent the Beaverton-Tigard Expressway.
A. Staff Report
. : .
Staff report, with recommendations for approval for
) an additional 90 days, on condition that the appropri-
ate
permit is obtained for the site; that total sign
' 1
. ,
i \ .
, .
PC Minutes - 7/1/75 - page 5
‘:.
11 a:• ' t
•
•
4."4
area is not to exceed 32 ft. and that sign is to
be relocated so as not to constitute a hazard to
,motorists, read by Powell.
B. Public Testimony
No one appeared.
C. Commission Discussion and Action
o General discussion of the appropriateness of the
sign as presently located ensued.
o Motion to approve subject to staff recommendations
(Hansen) .
o Seconded (Smelser) .
o Motion carried unanimously.
8. OTHER BUSINESS
4 o Commissioner Ball brought up the topics of recent legal F.r.
cases in the area of land use law, citing specifically
Baker vs. Milwaukie. Ball asked the Commission to re-
quest a discussion by the new City Attorney of these
cases before the Commission,
o Porter pointed out that there were a number of unresolved
issues previously attempted by the Planning Commission
over which they had asked some time ago to confer with
the City Council in order to discuss the particular
policies germaine to the issues involved.
Y : o Wakem pointed out that it may be valuable to orient the
Council to the Planning Commission's thinking with
respect to plu.Aning and that such a meeting would be
necessary in order to establish rational priorities
for future legislative matters. An example cited was
that of outdoor advertising signs and the amendment
of the Sign Code.
`j o Sakata asked that the staff address the issue of zoning
code enforcement. She stated that she personally had
noticed, and it had been frequently brought to her
attention, that conditions applied by the Planning
' , ` Commission to conditional uses were not being adhered
to and that other zoning code violations were becoming
commonplace.
o It was suggested that revocation of conditional uses is
a Planning Commission power and that a chock list of
conditional uses and their conditions should be estab-
lished for a vigorous enforcement programs
9. ADJOURNMENT: 10:50 p,m. "
PC Minutes - 7/1/75 - page 6
- r •
,
, t ,
. I. - .
, , t
, .
A 4 '
, .
1 4'
STAFF REPORT •,
Tigard Planning Commission
i
, .
' . '. July 1, 1975
Agenda Item 5.4
CU 14-75 (Auto Parts Store - TOT Supply Co. ) ,
, . Conditional Use
for a retail auto parts store to be located in an existing
building (former Haney Magnavox store) at 12200 SW Main St.
Staff Finding!
IY,v 1. The site is zoned C-3, General Commercial, presently. The
, .. zoning ordinance amendment creating _the new C-3M zone will
be effective; however, tbis month. The uses permitted on
this site either as "conditional usesu or "permitted uses"
will not be altered by that change,
. , .
.. 4.,
, 2. Auto parts and accessory sales are a conditional use allowed
, in this zone.
3. Existing land use of adjacent Main St. parcels consists of
. : ' .
a bank and a post office. There is a vacant commercial
building across the street and a clinic building to the rear.
4. Applicant intends to lease 3000 sq. ft. of a 5000 sq. ft.
• building.
5. Parking required by Tigard code is 9 spaces (1 space/500 sq.
ft. plus 1 space/2 employees plus 1 space/establishment)
le'
• for the applicant's proposed activity.
6. The Ti..Et.nd Community Plan and the adopted NPO ki commylnaiat
Plan designate this area for general commercial use.
. . 7. The site would benefit from provision of landscaping in con- .
, formance with present city code; however, Design Review is
. ,
not usually required unless a building permit for major
remodeling is applied for, although landscaping could be
required as a condition of a conditional use permit.
., Staff Recommendation
. ,
to be advised after close of public hearing
' -
. t
, : .
•
.
a •
q b •H
i.•
•
t +
;I:, •
•
s
••• *4.
••
•
.i
1i.
•
•
•
•
•
J •
Or
i
• Y *•••
Y • S i
.. ( i 0 S
J 1800 9
‘.1\ **� fed + •
• �� 4 �,, 'i + .• -,.
+ + It . ' ,"
1900 10
* ,\ %% ✓✓ s 30 ' ,r+-::•fr �� • 7'O
Y 4 y t CCC y �,. .`%
Y ti 1 ,' ,,t, r •i1�� .0".,,J` �` ,800 .1 ,
y (pQ ti i+% Da % y '�✓ zf .. ,/
•
4e
4.
4► !, ! �C 2„5 *1 i/ •' ,
\''4 %, 16 •r ■ it C " ', 24 N‘ ✓ r.. t* +N *
■
• , 1 i. �i r 41, .44 I 1 +
•
Kos . `4�
A. /y� Y'�1 ��� " /�Mi� 2`.�\ r`�A �h��+r��� iti �1
-; • ) q •." ��'' # c,_.\11*t4 , I ZOO ' '' ;;// t4-6•/16 4 it ♦ ` JtiY 1 i/ ......M r r 1 `
•►"+. 4 %�• ' ,i r 20 j)` k i/ �1 !�ti 6 ' 1 `
+►• ,•j/ "' is Y S +P `iv
~� 3 .Y�+''���� �. SSr�0"i �� 2301
ti '
Y rYr ii , t,� , .d Y 4 "�I�idC rr 5 „N N `y A. •
,,
,, , „.„ ,.- 3 * 4,,,,:.
7.... k / , 40n0 *** i :,44iii'.i-.J.1ii; L� t \ - .,
•
% 2r i1 / + IODa6 '')I)=ii...i?c.:►1r 23 �� ♦� �� /* 2400
■
• i ` 2501 b e" �;'
s• 'L
-
s' w
• rd•+ '6 Y, r 2: �
� :071°a: M�:C�4 J. rx6 C� rY'6 Vt
4
I'' 4 JY r /' ▪'� �
0.0•
+ b tiill.44.„, • • is ty ) ��Jw � ; 'l 1%-,:W 1 aqs_ , `:"�rtLJi l�L s+ "►i • f 0.y 4,4'
y `ii rY ! y y ddi� ,
tl4, 4' .t W.0 0 at. yr i� .°.
t .r.i.' � r� � r i -P„, i ell
•
Y.Y.,
)41;0 �� • 1 '`
r
t
°,• • t. .
. , . .
, .
. .
t
U
. L.•
'1
..
•
•
..,
Y.1
■
. .
1. ,*...
.., .
'
, AFFIDAVIT OP PUBLICATION .•.
STATE OF OREGON,
...
1 ss.
• COUNTY OF WASHINGTON,
NOTICE Or PUBLIC HEARING
, .. Joseph S caf E.r CITY OP TIGARD PLANNING COM- ,
. WSSION .'.
•
,
- t
Notice is hereby given that ptiblic ,..
, being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the publisher .— ------ , hearings will be held by the Planning
, .
Commission of the City of Tigard in the
.„.„........_..... of The Tigard Times, a newspaper of general circulation, as defined Mality Junior High School Lecture
Roorn,.14650 SW 92,th Avelue,Tigard,
.,.
, , Oregon. Said hearings mill pocur on ..
,.
by ORS 193,010 and 103.020, published at Tigard, in the aforesaid county and
July l', 1975, at 7:30 p.m. and will„con- ,
.. , state; that the legal notice, a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was *..g t‘alpricialGtwiointy 7.,c.T:$'13pply'Co.
'• *,: for a conditional tni‘t penult to es- (
P
3..
published in. the entire issue of said newspaper for successive and f tablish a retail auto parts store on
,, a C-31VI zoned site located at 2200 1 .
consecutive weeks in the following issues ......-..._.....—......._....... .,....„z:::. ,, SW Main St(tax nap 251 MA tax , ^
lot 2302). ..— 1 •
, . An application IV Youtgok and .
__............_____.....J.141.1ke 224....1975......_ ,
-----..... --- Nett for a zone change frog R-7 ,
to A-2 of a 9.05 acre parcel located
west"of SW hall Blvd.,000 ft.north
, . (sign e) br Pfeifle. (Tax map 11 35A1) tax
. ,..
lots 2402 and 2500; tax tnap 1S1
35DA tax lots 16013 and 1700).
. .
SUbspilbed ancl,,swoltn to before me this ...,„........., day of All persons having an interest in
. , ..
the nutters are invited to attend and
,
be heard,
-- .•....1.-pqr. - ,,,,-...2.°D.--..
P
• • , ., , , _--,.• •,",,,
(TT 2351 — Publish June 22, 1975
.. ,.,:ze,, .., it...,,,
6'ZIC A
„
. f Notary Public of Oregon
My commission eltpiVes '... e:::,--.6.r4.i.,!=t,..(1..,.. 19./47'.
... .
0.1 ./...................................mo.i..... , .
,. . .•• I
•
.t'•;;-•
. ..
■4
; •.1.0 .
' 1 •
; ' I
• ,
„ •
1
,
' 0
i 0.. .
, .
, • ';
; .
•,, ••• , ,
, . .. " '' „ '. `:- ', .• ,:., - ' ,. : ' ' .,. .. - , ',.,' . - " • . ' ' • .4..: ,
;49
ZONE CHANGE - CONDITIONAL USE - VARIANCE - TEMPORARY USE - NON-CONFORMING
USE REQUESTS
APPLICATION File
# _....
. ,
Fee Recld. /1-i-- .
Tigard Planning Commission 639-4171 Receipt #22,..a22_____
12420 SW Main St., Tigard, Oregon 97223
Date Rec'd. ----. . :-.--,. -'
By
4 .
— - 1
PLEASE PRINT IN INK OR TYPE
Action Requested Cond
_
I , Applicant's NameTgl1 Supply an _Phone14,2=26.09
Applicant's Address 7650 SW Sorrento St Deaverto 4..,..
street city eta e 2121(zi47-- . .
Owner's Name 1 rtaika jilQbQ_ _ Phone 639_5s1,64
'r
.■
■ '
Owner's Address 1575 SW Beef Bend load T . i e - .•
street ci y state z p
. .
Appll)ant is: Owner Contract Purohaser Developer Agent
..
, .
, Other X Lessee .
Owner Recognition of application:
-.
i V
-----iignature orile75Tow
,
Person responsible for applicationy Icolly
4468 UV Yeon Ave. Portland, , Oro
(street) (city) - (stater222E71F-
-,
. .
. ,
i., PROPERTY INVOLVED: Tax Map #, ,'5,/2 44 Tax Lot(s)s), 2 '&04(:
Address Lt 22iL0 SW ALIA s....1j. 44' Area (acres)
Existing Buildings (# and type) One k- nasorir'y -gipris
' .
Current zoningp=2yCurrent Use AtIgAlts,.....______ ..
Applicant's Applicant's VVV
Proposed Zoning C-'3M conditional Use Proposed Useputamitiltauplatto
111 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: Title Report "Fasan0Requirements
k:
Legal Description Vicinity Map .2
_
Tax Map Site Development Plan
Site Plan
* Occupied area requiring conditional zone change
will only be the first 3000 (three thousand) sq.
root facing Main Street.
-.)
. ,
, ,
..
lt
.,
. •.
.. .
. ,.
•
.•
,....„:.•. ..;
(, 1TICE OF PUBLIC HEARING •
..•
,.,
, .
...,
cITY'ue TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION . .
. ,
,.. Notice is hereby given that public hoarings will be held by the
. .
Planning Commission of the City of Tigard In the Twality Junior ,..
.. ...
High School Lecture Room, 14650 SW 97th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon«
.. • Said hearings will occur on July 1, 1975, at 7:30 p.m. and will .
concern the following:
• .
.x. An application by TCT Supply Co for a conditional
• ...o.
.. use permit to establish a retail auto parts store
•
on a C-3M zoned site located at 12200 SW Main St.
.. .. (tax map 2S1 2AA, tax lot 2302)« ...
. ..
. All persons having an interest in these matters are invited to at-timid
.. . •
. . -'and be heard. .
... . ..... -
.
,
d,
... vo, '■ „ .. **11 , " ..IF ‘S%
' 4 „. S . <4.,..
• ,000 l%., \ • •• 100 ,
..
- ` 0 , )#.?/•t„.
• C.((d. ', 4 / . ,.
6.9 At
.. ... ,..,
' )800 9 ',, 41+ %•
30 _...".- .1
..I .—,• .0. ,
.,
.•
' 2 • ci 5 '% /
A %Id . t.-NN ,.4, Q' 000 ,• •
.,.:I.. . \ 1900 10 ,. a , / 29 (...A.10'
v,\\•;.. /-
' 5rA,
•
., . • / • ,.'- / ..4 .*
3, -' \ • ii 4,. , ( 7 ., . +. / ', 900 9 \
2000 . C) // y ' ..../". • , /
• is 80As t.
1 • S /s .. 21 • .
. s . /,.? •,. 0 •, / .0' . /"„, //1" '''' •
. . . . / N • , „,..0• N. • )0 0P• \ :?.
6
' , 13 •, /•, 9 4. I , ..4 26 • / av, ,, .
.
2100 14 • • . to .
.
.
. •,•
I- '5 • 25 N/ ofe ' "1/4 1/4
. CO , , li■-1, %, ... . . .
2 i00 1'5 , I I 'iS). , • . 2 4 . #• (0.• #4,s s 1 s
■
/ •v' 5100 , J<Z.-
, e ?r-.. , ,,.. .4.,.,
, . .
• 16
`4,0' *--- ' 4
• • ' . " ■ 2 • ,, ....-N, .,..., ■ ■ •
.% >.I. 4.■ .4. .)41 . .1..,..:
■ ■
,i.
s I T .0. .•
•
•r,.*......s 0, '.„'<
■. \4 5 %—.j.
5 •,$t•t..*t,,
'.5 ' *,'•,..,.._3i i2x i,0,e,0 ti>.i,N s 0.
6
. . .NI e/ I . .
S S. ,
' ' . 20 / ., 4%d 4 5 •N 5300 • ./ 2 01 , %s.
6 . .Ni" , '., 16 • i: y • 4.At. • 44 e . / /",•' •.. 00 a " \ Aff,hi % ,.
■,, \
•\,4 S.i.' ...,"
.,•,
....
'•
■
■ N•'/ .
.N. s s. • 10 ',0 4.,,,,V• •............":;`,15..N,.: •
' ,..;••
,1 A
.. 4 ., h 0 .......trlf...11.....
''• , #/ h,." 4,,,,'4„..1/440,1T %, it■ .... l'........... lel y ,.4.,..;........fs,,(C3.4•10.0.A14 4',4,
...- .
.
,... ' -.• - " ,,-.-:..A..,.......... ,.:
,,,V.11111.1.1:111.1.111:.:1:.;• 01..
•
,,, go;j.v . ,^14:111,4111111*,4. 2 3 00 .4 2 400 . /
„ .
t•t , ' 4t t.i'SIVO;111V•'•' 2.z A c 0/
,..,
g.'" V;
■ I S. 4. ::.
■ 4'
, \ s, Oi \ 117 / k 0
,
, ...,..
• \"•• \ Ails \c .
4,r / ,,,
\ :260%1 abStOC i0734...
I 1'Ac 4. . .
. *:. io , 4.,
o0 ii• .4./.4,.:3Sitki''..10,6 4to , I
S.
Sli t,CO. / 25( .....)'..if,,,,,;.0.
■.:s••,;.,.i II '• 2 .
..:,
it,'00'I-11* s ,
44(0 ''t,''' ■ 4 T1
.4- . ',II k 0 j--- s.,:‘,.. /
„tb .i.A t ' .406, d,"'
/ o.
#••
I ....i. ' ....1
% 'til• 44,4 .• e
o.■• / 10,1,
a t 44.;•,ir,,,,,, Ir_ •••—""\, . .
..::/:, !Op AC T.
•a* Id 4 e ''r 1 ■ \
)'' 4,t
4.'‘e /1..co 044 ttl:. ::Via • „le'2700
' V
' ..
'..•••\,... 54, 1. i * ''. ITSI.•H.Itk...11••, se.° g 1 • / ,...4
%.\,,f.. 4-/ int''''11'‘' ..° r'k j"." 2900.bb
c
e44 . 4100 .1;- / . ''..0. r IA
. ,
• . , ,.. / 1.4' $bAe.
' ' ,000.,, . 4.1.4 4. 'V'''.
...., -.„0' / 1.44d4 ''' N „is c / .
tst •.„P / 4,i„:".*4 206 4... 3902
z6
. .
.. , .4,,..4, . ..... 4 •4, Ks 4, k.s 4,/4
/
6,,, • ° 4'06), '0,, 0■i' 4.t/ /
..... .,04e, i / 4.4 I/ - le / . •
„ . et!)• '12 r. sto i2p sit. •
41e tr I'' s4'
Co • •4800 .1. S'‘. 24
4 ''a .4k, ' • d 6 At .1A. '1'1 *6 e.S4/
. ,..
cid. it! ' .4,, ,„ 0, .,10..,195\5 ...;;;,, , il. • ..
:.1
....•..: ■
il •
• i *
. •
y ,
k'1.;'.
�'
IA
4 p
+'
t
'1
TO: Planning Commission Staff
Planning Commission
City? Council
SUBJECT: Answers to questions for
Zoning Map Amendment Application
• '(,o t 1. q Please state the specific purpose of
your proposed zpne change.
•
4
A The specific irpose of the proposed
zone ohau ,e to permit conditional
, use of press..0 zone for a retell parts
and accessory store.
2. q Is the requested zoning in conformance
with Tigard's adopted Comprehensi:re
Plan and other adopted precise plans as
,;J: may be related to your request.
A We feel that the proposed variance would
complement the main street environment
as well as be an economic asset to the
,, community. It does conform to the Com-
' prehensive Plan as we understand it.
• 3. Q, Does your proposed zone change fulfill
a community need for the proposed use.
A The proposed conditional use does fulfill
. , the neeJ. in the community for an auto
supply store that is designed for the
p individual rather than the dealer/garage
wholesale client.
4. Q, Have there been changes in conditions
( i.e. land use, street capacity, avail-
ability of sewer and water servid.e,
etc. ) that would justify a change in
-, zone.
A s we see t Main Street, Tigard, is
changing to become a more retail
area that it has been in the pest.
These changes in conditions have made
'4, the area attractive to us.
....... ..- .. ,.. .. .-.w'ArsuMMF^y»tawr?.M.ow,Hy. ,.ern !ru,,.F. t:r.'=+•.a.r» - .���,su.:+ca.y�...�-w,*
Q
.. Y .r
5. 4 Why is the proposed location for your
proposed zone change more suitable
than other locations in the City
zoned to allow your proposed use.
A This location is most suitable to us
for the following reasons:
Physical Location- Centrally located
in the heart of the Tigard Business
District. The visability is good
from both main arterials.
Traffic Flow- The amount of traffic
and apparent destination of the traffic
indicates they are arriving or departing
th :s area and not just enroute.
Availability- There is a shortage of
buildings of this size and price range in
the Tigard market.
Parking- Is adequate for out needs.
Approximately 3.3 parking spaces
per 500 square feet.
6. 4, What effect will your proposed devel-
opment have on adjacent properties and
on the adjacent neighborhoods.
•
A The planned store will have no effect on
the adjacent property, with the exception
that our type of store has an extremly
high success to failure ratio. This might
possibly make the adjacent propetties
attract a more success orientated clientele.
7. Q, What types of public services are necessitated
by your proposed development and what impact
will your project have on these public
services,
A We see no immediate or long range additional
public services as necessary. With the
exception that occupied buildings with goods
inside might require police cooperation. But
on the other hand empty buildings are by
far more subject to vandalism.
I
•
(,
• TIGARD AREA MARKET STUDY * FACT SHEET
Drawing Area - Five-mile radias
Vehicle Registration History - 1970 to 1975 shows 29%
increase.
Number of Parts Stores -- Three
Number of Retail-Only Parts Stores - None
Average spent on parts per vehicle, this market, 175.00 per annum
•
( does not include tires and batteries)
Market Potential -
Veh. Registration 30, 100
Annual Aveg, Expend. 175.00
$5,267, 500400 per annum
Market Penetration - (Existing Distribution)
Store #1 500, 000.00 per annum
Store #2 300,000.00
Store #3 450, 000.00
Oil Co. outlets 2,000,000.00
Discount Stores 550 000.00
' `u, 250,000.00 TOTAL PENETRATION
./ Available Market - $2, 0010700.00 per annum, going out of the Tigard
area. Market.
■
,! f
.' i
• 1'
•,. .:-h..+- - _ _ _. .enA@�Maua..m.1..MFw4a V. ,I...of .., __ _ - ..
f ,,u. .n 1 wM::dfnn.arw ry 'Ynw.w-.,•hr. ....:r..•. „_...��- „., .rr