Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
SDR1990-00025
POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. a f r i CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 90 -0025 VARIANCE STAR ' 90 -0040 NESBITT ASSOCIATES'(EMBASSV SUITES HOTEL) APPLICATION: A request by Patrick M. Nesbitt Associates, Inc. for 1) Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 113 hotel suite addition to the Embassy Suites Hotel and an approximately 10,000 square foot expansion to the hotel's conference facilities; 2) variance approval proposed allow the L addition to be built to a height of approximately 82 feet, whereas the Community Development Code's building height exception process allows for a maximum building height of 75 feet; 3) a variance to allow a number of the standard length parking spaces to be 8.5 feet in width, whereas the Code requires a minimum, width of 9 feet for standard spaces; and 4) to allow up to 35 percent of the required parking spaces to be compact parking spaces for the 'combined Embassy Suites /One Embassy Center complex whereas the. Code allows & maximum of 25 percent of required spaces to be compact parking spaces. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial). T Washington Square 26BC, Tax Lots 1500 and Location: • 9 0 0 0 SW Wash ' n ton S arp Road (wCTN! 1S 1503) DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Community Development Director's designee for the City g above described applications, subject ^e Git of Tigard' has APPROVED the abov 'to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted below: FINDINGS OF FACT 1: Background Development of the existing Embassy Suites hotel was approved by the Washington County Hearings Officer on February `28, 1985 °. The hotel'. site and other adjoining parcels were annexed to the City of Tigard`, in April, 1987. No other land use or development applications directly affecting these parcels have been reviewed by the City of g Tz and since annexation. 2. Vicinity Information The existing 245 suite, 82 foot tall Embassy Suites Hotel is located The existin hotel is immediately south of the proposed expansion y J,, laoated p ntirely Ta Lot One E mbassy Center office building which is 70 feet °ta17 and contains 81,780 square feet of office, space is located immediately south of the existing hotel on tax lot 1506.. These develop ments hare' access v. iva road which provide ac s irg tcn Square shopping center and SW ,Sall Boulevard and SW Schol„ls Ferry Road. The private access drives are named Washington S'uare Driv'e's I and II. Properties'; to the : west of the subject site contain a bank and a service ,station which front' on SW Scholls Fe xy Aoad', The Washington DIR EC''OR' S DECISION SDR 900025 /VAR 90 -0040 '- N] SBITT . PAGE '1 ,i. Circle shopping center is located to the west, across Washington Square Drive II. The Embassy Suites /One Embassy Center, complex as well as surrounding'` properties to the north, east, south, and west are zoned C-G (General Commercial), with the exception of the Golden Key Apartment, complex`' which is just south of the Embassy Center office' building. The Golden Key property is zoned R-40 (Residential, 40 units/acre). Both SW Scholls Ferry Road and Hall Boulevard are' under the jurisdiction of the Oregon State Highway Division. Both roads are classified by the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map as Y g P P arterial streets. The intersection of these two streets has recently been upgraded to include two travel lanes in each direction as well as left and right turn lanes. The intersection is signalized. In addition, the intersections of the two private access roads to Washington Square, and therefore to the Embassy Suites /Embassy Center complex are also s ignalized intersections. Site Information and Proposal Description Tax Lot 1500 contains the existing Embassy ,Suites Hotel, associated landscaping, and a paved parking lot. Tax lot 1503 contains a portion of the paved parking lot, a gravel parking lot, and narrow grass areas g parking Parcels sass covered areas ad ' acent to the gravel ark�.n area. Thee arc els are relatively flat, except on the west side of the site where the ground slopes steeply towards the intersection of the access road with SW Schanz Ferry Road. The applicants propose construction of a 113 suite addition to the hotel, above a 10,000 square foot meeting room expansion to the hotel's conference and meeting facilities. The expansion would be directly connected to the existing hotel. The addition would utilize the same exterior materials and design concept as the existing hotel. Proposed landscaping material and the parking lot addition are also intended to extend the existing style of improvements. The Site plan notes that the total site area, including the, expanded hotel and office building would include 18 percent of the site as landscaped area; conversely 82 percent of the site would be covered with impervious surface. The applicant .requests',ite developrient review, approval of the expanded site plan. The �. hotel ex osed ro expansion would be nine stories 82 feet in p p . hei ht The C -G zone allows a maximum height of 45 feet; height. et:; however, Community Development Code Section 18.98 allows a maximum building height of 75 feet an non - residential property if certain conditions, . are satisfied. The project satisfied these criteria; however, the applicants request a variance to make the building 7' feet taller than the maximum allowed by the building height exception DIIRECTOR'S DECISION SDR 90 -0025 /VAR 90-0040 - 1\1ESBITT PAGE; The applicant- request approval of a shared parking plan for the combined uses on the four tax lots Tax Lots 1500, 1503, 1504, and 1506. The uses sharing the parking area will include the hotel, restaurant, lounge, and conference facilities' included in the ;Embassy Suites Hotel building and the various office 'uses housed` in the 81,780 square foot One Embassy Center building. The shared parking plan will provide for a total of 620 on -site parking ,.stalls, including 375 spaces on the Embassy Suites property and 245 spaces in the surface parking lot and parking structure on the One Embassy Center property. The proposed parking stalls would be distributed as follows: SIZE NUMBER OF SPACES 8' x 15' 134 8.5' x 15' 82 8.5' x 18' 227 9' x 18' 15$ 9' x 18' HC 14 10' x 20' ,._.5' TOTAL 620 The Community Development Code requires. that full size parking spaces be 'a minimum of 9 feet wide. The Code also requires that no more than 25 percent of all required parking spaces be , compac:t parking spaces. Therefore, the requested shared parking plan necessitates variances to both the minimum width standard for standard parking spaces to allow 227 full length spaces to be only 8.5 feet in width, and a variance to allow 34 percent of the required spaces to be compact spaces Agency and NPO Comments q The Engineering Division has reviewed the ��e ue st and provides the following' comments: a. The site accesses to S.W. Soholls: Ferry Rd. and S,W, Hall Blvd. both of which are under Oregon Department of Transportation jurisdiction The Department of 'Transportation has been contacted for comments and they have no concerns /comments about this addition, The 'red " " son for their no comment was that;' based on Embassy Suites initial development application, the applicant provided information to . accommodate for this level of dveloPmente b Sanitary sewer is available on site, The sanitary sewer systern,' that the applicant is proposing to use is under the jurisdiction of the Cityi of Beaverton, The applicant should be required to follow any recommendations; related to eanitary sewers regtusted'by the C ity'of Beaverton, DIRECTOR'S', DECISION SDB, 90- 0025 /VAR 90 0040 - NESB,TT'i` PAGE 3 c. The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce (Resolution No. 90 -43) Surface Water Management Regulations requiring; the construction of on -site water quality facilities or fees in lieu of their construction.' Requiring surface water quality facilities on small sites would result in numerous facilities that would become a maintenance burden to the City. Furthermore, the applicant has not proposed any such facilities and there are no natural depressions or other areas of this site that 'particularly' suitable for water quality facilities. Regional facilities, funded by fees in lieu, of construction of these facilities' • would provide the required treatment with improved reliability and less maintenance. Consequently a fee -in -lieu of the construction of on -site water quality facilities should be assessed. d Storm drainage collection .facilities are provided on -site, outfalling to an Oregon Department of Transportation owned /maintained facility. The Department has not noted any deficiencies with regard drainage ' egard to the storm drama. � facilities under the state's jurisdiction e, Washington County has established and the City has agreed to enforce, ( Traffic Impact Fees 90-65) Tr development Resolution No. p de purpose of the fee is to ensure that new tributes to extra -ca acit transportation ted by meets p � y � Improve con such nee additional shall y needed to accommodate addi t i nal traffic genera a the such : p required development. The applicant l be rer airs The Oregon State Highway Division has reviewed the proposal and has commented that because the additional rooms and meeting facility now proposed are within the scope of the original development plan for the Embassy Suites Hotel, no traffic study has been required at this time and no additional are to be required theedeveloper time q xpan Deal measttrsge�erat,ed by the proposed r sign to mitigate impacts of traffic The Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District has reviewed the site plan and has noted that the existing property boundary between tax lots 1500 and 1503 which is shown to pass through the proposed building expansion will need to be relocated through a lot lime adjustment or will need to be eliminated through' lot 'consolidation in order that the building not cross a property line, In addition, the F ire District notes that the developers of the One Embassy Center building had previously committed; to an adjustment between tax lots 1500 and 1506 to relocate the boundary, away' from the building since the building was not constructed consistent with Uniform Building Code firewall construction requirements. The current site plan does not indicate that this has been completed. This adjustment should also be accomplished at this ''time _�. The City of Beaverton has reviewed the proposal because the Embassy Suites /One Embassy center complex is serviced by sanitary sewers ' ' 90-0025/VAR 90 -0040 NESBITT PAGE 4 IS.CON DIRECTOR '18 DEC SDR 9 provided by the City of Beaverton that flow to a Unified Sewerage Agency wastewater 'treatment plant. Beaverton states that the sanitary sewer which serves the Embassy Suites site is presently` at capacity. Therefore, the developer of the proposed expansion will need to provide for additional capacity for the line through conducting a study of the needed improvements and then constructing'_ the improvements in accordance with Beaverton standards.` The Metzger Water District, PGE, and the City of Tigard Building Division have reviewed the proposal and have offered no , comments. No other comments have been received. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION Site Devel.00ment Review The proposal for construction of a 9 -story hotel /conference center addition g y . •y ;Developm.nt to the existing Embassy Suites Hotel conforms with Communal, Code C -G (General Commercial) zoning district standards for setbacks, lot coverage, (maximum site coverage of 85 percent allowed; 82 percent coverage proposed, and minimum site landscaping (minimum 15 percent site landscaping, required; 18 percent proposed). A variance to the C -G zoning district's maximum building height limit of 75 feet (building height exception) is requested to allow, the proposed building to be 82 feet tall. That request is addressed separately below. Transient lodging (hotels) is a permitted use in the C -G zone. The proposal' conforms with Site Development Review building placement and siting standards, as well as Community Development Code standards for vision clearance at the driveway /roadway intersections, buffer 'area landscaping, street frontage landscaping, and parking area landscaping,' The proposal's response to Code requirements related to'lparking is described below. Variance to Bui1di,-Ieiaht Standard The maximum building height Standard in the C--G zone is 45 feet. However, Section 1.8.98.020 of the Community Development Code (Building Height Exceptions) allows a maxirnum building height of 75, feet when the building's floor area does s building` oes not exceed 1.5 times the area of the site;', each setback from the property's boundaries equals at least one .half, of the build g height; of the proposed structure does.not abut din s hei h,t, and if the site a residential zoning district. The proposed hotel expftnsion would be 82 feet tall, 7 feet taller tl n the building height exception would allow. The following is provided to show that the proposed development satisfies the building height exception standards`' -so that the applicant is only requesting a variance to the 75 foot tall standard rather than a variancr from tb.e' g height ,standard of the 'C -G zone 45 foot maximum l�t.ald�.n � y DIRECTOR' S DECISION SDR 50 -0025 /VAR 90 0040 NESBITT PAGE 5 The total square foota g e of the expanded buildin g would be approximately 294,000 square feet. The total area of the three tax lots included in the Embassy Suites Hotel site is approximately 213,880 square feet. Therefore, the expanded building's floor area would, not exceed 1.5 times the area of the site. A11 building setbacks from property lines would be more than one half the building's proposed 82 foot height,.' The smallest setback would be approximately 75 feet from the property's northeastern boundary abutting the service station and bank. The site is not adjacent to any residential zoning district; all abutting properties are zoned C -G. Therefore, all of the building height exception criteria are satisfied which gives the building an outright opportunity to be built to 75 feet in height. The applicants request a variance to allow an additional 7 feet of building height beyond the 75 feet permitted by the building height exception to allow the proposed expansion to be built at the same height as the existing Embassy Suites building. Secf-ion 18.134.050 of the Community Development Code contains the following criteria which apply to the variance request: The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this Code; be in conflict with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan, to any other applicable policies and standards; and to other properties in the same zoning di.strict.orivicinity. There are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the lot size or shape, topography, or other circumstances for which the applicant has not control and which are not applicable to other properties in the game zoning district. The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this Code and City standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible, while permitting some econorui.c use of the land. Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic land forms or parks will not be adversely affected any more than would occur if the development were located as specified in the code. The hardship is not self- imposed and the variance requested is the minimum variance which would eliminate the hardship.' The applicant has submitted the following justification for the height variance request: 1. The existing Embassy Suites Hotel was built in unincorporated Washington County prior to annexation to the City of Tigard. There were no preset height limitations,' imposed by Washington County applicable to this site. Each project wows reviewed on an individual basis with respect tohbuilding height. Washington County approved a height of 80 feet ; for the existing building. 2. From a structural engineering and construction standpoint, we must duplicate the structural' system of the original hotel, Since the D1REC'TDR' S DtiCigION SDP. 1.90 - 0025 /VAR 90- 0040' _ NESIE4ITT PAGE 6 buildings will be attached to each other, it is essential to address seismic and other construction related aerations. ed structural considerations. 3 From an aesthetic standpoint, the building needs to be the same height from top to bottom and at each floor level in order to achieve a contiguous look. 4. Often city -- imposed height limitations are designed to control density. This project includes 8 floors that are 8.5 feet tall, and a ground floor that is 14 feet from floor-to-floor. This high floor - to _floor area on the first floor is necessary for, all of the mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems The net effect of such a high floor -to -floor area on the first floor is that the actual density of the project is less than might be expected if this floor height was the same as the upper floors. 5. Embassy Suites Hotel sits on a recessed site. The finished floor of the existing hotel sits below the grade level of the surrounding Hall Boulevard and rear access drive. This gives a visual impression of a much shorter building from the northern and eastern sides. . The entire Nesbitt parcel, which includes the Embassy Suites Hotel, the One Embassy Center office building, and the parcel on which we intend to build the expanded hotel was originally planned to accommodate this level of development. The primary intent of the Code's building height and setback requirements are to provide adequate light and space between buildings. In the subject situation, existing buildings on all sides of the site except to the northwest are separated by public or private roadways that are not likely to be removed in the near. future. These roadways serve to separate neighboring buildings assuring adequate light, and spacing. The properties to the northwest are already developed with single -story buildings. It is Possible that these sites could be redeveloped in the future with taller g building separation would existing` buildings. . l�7everthc;.l;ess, a substantial bu�.ldz: • between the proposed hotel addition and these Properties due to the large parking and, landscaped area proposed on the hotel site. The separation of the proposed building from buildings on adjacent properties, therefore, does not appear to conflict with the above - stated Code purposes related to building height. The special circumstance which affects this application is primarily the history i G1 4. not appear excessively tall east is such that the proposed building will relative to its neighbors. The use proposed for the site, an expansion to an existing hotel, is a permitted use in this C -G zoning district. The variance request would not affect use of the site. The intensity of the development as indicated by the less than 1:1 floor area ratio is consistent with Code standards as well as being compatible with other development in the area. The proposed building expansion has been designed as an integral element of the'Eoibassy Suites /One Embassy Center complex with access circulation, parking and drainage designed to be compatible with existing development. The requested building height is not anticipated to adversely affect. traffic levels on nearby streets or affect other public facilities since the floor area of the building is not greater than would be allowed without the variance, nor is it any ,greater than was considered in the development approval for construction of the existing hotel. Recent improvements to nearby roads were designed with the traffic load contributed by full development of this site fully considered. There are no significant natural features on or near this site that would be affected by the requested variance. The hardship from which the applicant requests relief is the incompatibility in design that would result from the expansion not being able to be of the same height as the existing hotel building. The building would not be compatible aesthetically, and possibly would not be as compatible structurally, as is presently proposed. The amount of variance that is requested, 7 feet, is the minimum variance which 'would alleviate the hardship. The requested variance is, therefore, justified. Shared Parking agree pL p p Parking paces' be provided on the combined The a �licants Pro Pose that 620 arki.n s provided Suites /One Embass Center level including th.. 245 Embassy Y p o merit site, Inc sace. presently for One Embassy Center, an n the spaces p y p y Embassy Suites hotel site. The shared parking arrangement proposed is intended to provide sufficient parking to meet anticipated parking demand';. for the combined ; uses at any one time although the total number of spaces p rovided would not be enough to meet minimum required parking standards if the uses are considered se p a^atel Y The d pp1icants assert that because the different uses have differing peak parking demand 'periods, a shared parking ' arrangement is warranted to avoid an o ver- supply of unneeded parking spaces. The combined development would include several different uses. Comrnunllty Development Code Section 13.106.030.0 provides minirnurn parking requirements for a number of commercial use types occupying the combined 'development. The administrative and professional offices inclu ded in One Embassy Center are required to be provided with one parking space for every 350 square feet of ..gross floor area. For transient lodging facilities (hotels and motels), one parking space is required for each guest room, plus one space for every two employees. Eating and drinking establishments, such as the lounge and restaurant, included within the Embassy Suites Hotel are DIRECTOR'S' DECISION SDR 90 0025/VA 0040 - 'NESSSTT: � R 90 �. PAGE Sj required to provide one parking space for every fifty square feet of dining area, plus one parking space for every two employees. Patrick M. Nesbitt & Associates, owner and developer of the One Embassy Center and the Embassy Suites hotel has submitted a letterl stating that the firm believes that the proposed,620 parking stalls to be provided will be more than adequate for the combined uses on this site. Nesbitt Associates has found from past experiences in managing similar projects that the following supports this contention: First, Emba.': y ` Suites Hotels, Inc- has its own minimum parking standard of one parking stall per hotel guest suite. The standard is a guideline established to insure the guest's convenience and satisfaction. In 1986, Consumer Re op its magazine rated Embassy Suites as, having the ` highest - 'consumer satisfaction rating of any hotel chain. Nesbitt Partners states that if the minimum parking requirement that the chain im po ses was not adequate, con-. s umers would not show this sort of satisfaction with the hotel's operation. Second, Nesbitt has provided details on other Embassy' Suites hotels' owned by the Nesbitt organization that include full service restaurants, lounges, conference facilities, and hotel suites. The number of parking stalls per hotel suite ratio varies from 0.96 to 1.47. The proposed p � Tigard g Embassy Suites parking area 'will provide e p ro 375 parking spaces for 358 suites, or a ratio of 1,05 stalls /suite ratio. However, the applicant's proposed shared, parking agreement with the adjacent office building will provide a total of 620 parking, stalls, or a ratio of 1.73 at times during which the office building (and presumably its parking area) is vacant. Third, the applicants believe that the amount of parking to be provided will be sufficient because of the synergistic relationship among the uses involved in the hotel and the office building, as well as because of the varied peak parking demand for the uses within the hotel as compared to the peak demand for parking created by the use within the office building, The a p l�cants have based this analysis of the synergistic relationship upon guidelines found in the UrbarL Land Institute's handbook Shared Parking, as well as the applicants' experience in operating other Embassy Suites' hotels. The' applicants' chart is attached to this report as ' "ATTACHMENT 1 ". The chart shows' that the anticipated peak total parking demand for the combined' hotel, restaurant, lounge, meeting area, and 89,000 square foot office structure would be 612 parking spaces at approximately 11:00 on a weekday morning. It is pointed out that this analysis assumes full occupancy of the hotel and office structures- As the chart indicates, there is a significant ' amount of overlap between the different uses (meeting rooms, , guest rooms, lounge and restaurant;) within the hotel. Quite often, guests staying at the hotel, are there to also use the meeting room facilities,' and they also frequent the restaurant and lounge during their stay. In addition, local group g restaurant or lounge as well. 'Therefore, meetings will, often use the re�,ta y i hotel's'', facilities can any mane visitors utilize more than one of the ho DIRECTOR'S DECISION SDI. 90 0025 /VAR 90,.0040 - NESgtTT PAGE 9 given visit, and therefore a proper parking analysis must consider this shared use In addition, the applicants state that as an additional measure of conservatism, the attached parking analysis does not take into account, but probably should, the fact that some guests staying at the hotel will be conducting business in the adjacent One Embassy Center office. This will serve to further reduce the actual parking demand (The above indented paragraphs attempt to summarize arguments made by Doug Comstock of Nesbitt Associates to Terry Offer of the City of Tigard in a letter dated January 7, 1991). Code Section, 18.106.020.F allows the City to accept shared parking arrangements in commercial districts where owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading paces when the hours of operation of the various uses do not overlap. The Code requires that satisfactory evidence be presented in the form of deeds, leases, or contracts to establish the shared parking arrangement. Staff finds that the applicants' analysis adequately demonstrates that the 620 parking spaces to be provided on the combined hotel and office complex site will provide adequate parking for the uses contained in the Embassy Suites and One Embassy Center. Because of ` the various uses' differing peak parking demand periods, it does not seem that the shared parking facilities will ever be so full that prospective users of these developments will need to seek parking :spaces outside the site By the nature of the use included in the hotel, inconvenient parking on nearby streets or other properties caused by a full parking lot would most likely cause prospective hotel, restaurant, or lounge users to take their business elsewhere rather than to put up with the inconvenience. In order to guarantee that the shared parking arrangement will continue;, it will be necessary for the applicants to submit satisfactory legal evidence in the form of deeds, leases, or a shared parking contract that will guarantee a continuation of the shared parking agreement proposed by this application, even if the parcels involved should be sold to different owners. Evidence of the shared parking agreement will need to be presented to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. Variances-Standard Parkinct Space Width acid Com ap ct /Standard parkinq*Ratio. The requested reduction in standard parking space width from 9 feet to 8.5 feet as well as the adjustment to the compact /standard parking space ratio are reasonable with respect to the types of uses included on these properties where most vehicles that are parked on the site are parked throughout the dory or throughout the night. This situation is considered; quite different than a retail or civic use situation where there would typically be many users of the same parking space throughout the day and a greater need for the convenience provided by a full width' parking stall. The Community Development Code's minimum parking space dimensions are intended to apply to all parking lot situations, although st aff has fie uentl q y found that the characteristics of the use of a particular parking lot situation are often such that strict compliance with DIRECTOR S DECISION SDR 900025 /VAR 900040 NESBIT'I" PAGE, 10 the Code requirements may result in over - design of the a needs of the uses served by the lot. In a retail or civic use situation, parking spaces need to be larger to accommodate the varying users of the space who may be dealing with babies, . packages or other objects which require that doors be wide open to provide additional maneuvering room. These limitations are less likely in an office, restaurant, or lounge parking, lot situation due to the different types of parking space users. Hotel users can have baggage removed from their vehicles by hotel personnel at the entrance to the hotel rather than having to remove the baggage themselves in a parking space in the lot- If visitors or employees require additional area for maneuvering of parcels or additional passengers, they can move to another area of the parking lot to find a space next to an aisle, walkway, or other open parking space. Likewise, the driver will seek out a longer parking space elsewhere, to accommodate a car that will not fit into a compact space in order to protect their own car. If the inconvenience becomes too great, it is assumed that the driver will either take their business elsewhere or make arrangements with the development's manager for the necessary parking space. The inconvenience may therefore be a limiting factor in the attractiveness of the development to guests of the hotel or tenants of the office building. Therefore; the applicants' request is most likely to cause an inconvenience to their own interests rather to any public interest: The public interest with regard to parking space width is to make sure that the reduced width does not become too inconvenient to potential users that they choose to instead park on public streets or other private streets in order to have usable parking spaces. This would be highly unlikely in the present situation because the proximity to the hotel and office building offered by the surface parking areas and the office building's parking structure would tend to more than compensate for any inconvenience caused by smaller spaces. Additionally, the applicants point out that the narrower parking space size requested was permitted outright by Washington County for the earlier Embassy Suite development approval for the existing hotel building. The requested variance would allow continuation of the established design pattern for the development. The applicants have not encountered difficulties or complaints with regard to parking space widths with the existing parking lots. The narrower spaces allow a net decrease in site coverage and a commensurate increase in landscaped area which provides a public visual benefit and decreased surface runoff. Staff finds that for these reasons, the requested variance will be beneficial to the development scheme for Embassy Suites /One Embassy Center Without creating adverse impacts to public interests, to physical or natural systems such as public roadways or drainageways, or to the interests of adjacent propertyy owners. The amount of variance from the standard reasonable with respect to what has previousl s y been p. permitted it for the entire development as well as with respect to what other . jurisdictions have found to be adequate. The reduction in parking space DIRECTOR'S DECISION SDR 90 -0025 /VAR 90-0040 - NESSITT PA08 f width may also have some public benefit in that it would decrease the amount of site coverage that would be necessary if the same number of parking spaces were constructed in strict compliance with Code requirements. PPaarkinq, Lot Detail Whereas, the site plan and narrative provide sufficient detail for the Planning Division to determine that a sufficient number of Parking spaces will be provided for the uses on the site, the site plan does not provide enough detail on the locations of the various sizes of parking spaces, locations of designated handicapped spaces, and provisions for bicycle parking to determine that Code standards related to parking will be satisfied. Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant will need to provide a detailed parking plan for the entire site that, includes a minimum of 14 designated handicapped parking spaces 22 bicycle parking spaces within racks, and 620 total automobile parking spaces of sizes as described in Mr . Comstock's January' 7, letter. It is recommended that larger parking spaces be located close to the buildings in order to serve the normal parking demand for the various uses. DECISION The Director's designee APPROVES Site Development Review SDR 90 -0025 and Variance VAR 90 -0040 for expansion of the Embassy Suites Hotel subject to the following conditions THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING CHRIS DAVIES OF JILDIIVC PERMIT . UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, STAFF CONTACT IS CH THE CITY OF TIGARD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, 639- 4171. 1. The site plan shall be revised to provide additional information on Parking the distribution of a•rlcin- spaces on the site. The. parking for the Embassy Suites Hotel and One'Embassy Center office building shall be as noted by the applicant's request. No less than 620'total parking spaces shall be provided, including the following: SIZE NUMBER.....OF SPACES 8' x 15' 184 85''x 15' 82 8.5' x 18' 227 9' x 18' 158 9' x 18' Iic 14 10' x 20 y 5 TOTAL 620 No less than 22 ' bicycle, parking spaces shall be provided. in bicycle racks adequately protected from motor vehicle mo rem nts • Details shall be provided on rack types and locations . STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Offer, Planning Division, 639 -4171 , DIRECTOR'S DECISION SDR 90 -0025 /VAR 90 -0040 - NESBITT( PAGE 12 04. J • are Sanitary sewer and storm drainage details and calci1ations shall be provided as Part of the site improvement plans. Calculations shall be based on full development of the serviceable area. The location and capacity of existing, proposed, and future lines shall be addressed. Designs and calculations submitted shall be stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer licensed to practica in the State of Oregon. The applicant shall provide documentation to the City of Tigard that the sanitary sewer connection for the proposed expansion has been approved by the City' of Beaverton Engineering Division It appears that the developer will be required to provide improvents to the City of Beaverton sanitary sewer tha4 t,ierves the site. The applicant shall provide documentation that detailed storm drainage''` plans for the expanded , use of the site have been approved' by the Oregon State Highway Division's Sylvan Dis+ Nict Office, g p construction of proposed.` Bu�Tdin. Permits will not, be issued and cons improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering Department has reviewed and approved the improvements. As part of, the improvement plans the applicant shall submit details anr�'-r calculations that show the chang in the amount of impervious surface, area created by this developme In addition the fe• -in -lieu for water quality shall be paid., 4.' The applicant shall. pay the traffic impact fee prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. The actual TIF w'` 1;1 be based on the number of rooms shown in the final approved design and the trip rate in effect at the time of Building Permit application. 5. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the improvement drawings. The plan shall Conform to " Erosa,,on Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, November 1989." . The applicant shall provide to the Engineering Department one set of "as- built " myla: -- of the storm and sanitary '" improvements. 7. The existing property boundary between tax lots 1500 and 1503 which is shown to pass through the proposed building expansion will need to be relocated through a lot line adjustment or willneed to be eliminated through lot consolidation in order that the building not cross a property line. In addition, an adjustment must also be made between tax lots 1500 and 1506 to relocate the boundary away from 'the One Embassy Center building ' since the building was not constructed consistent with Uniform Building Code firewall: construction requirements. TAE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF AN OCCUPANCY >PERMIT FOR THE PROPOSED ADDITION. All landscaping materials shall be installed or financially assured as per the approved landscaping plan. All public improvements and other s ite m r pr ovements shall also be completed as per the approved plans, STAFF CONTACT: Ferry Offer, Planning Division, 639 -4171. DIRECTOR'S DECISION SDR 90-0025 /VAR 90 0040 NESBITT PAC4E 13 ,v • Sign permits shall be obtained prior to the erection of any new signs. THIS APPROVAL IS - VALID'IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE FINAL DECISION DATE NOTED BELOW. • PROCEDURE • f ARE Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and ;mailed to K The applicant and owners X' Owners of record within the required distance X The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization X Affected government agencies Final Decision: ' THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON 2 2.91 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 ' of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. Appeal fee schedule and forms are available at Tigard City. Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon. The deadline for fil3,11g of an appeal is 3 :30 p.m. FEBRUARY 20, 1991 2.112.2..t.121,1s: p If You have questions, p leas call City of Tigard Planning Dep artment, City of Tigard City Hall , 1312 5 SW Hall B lvd . , Tigard, Oregon sce)i- /f.'•/ • Offer DATE elopment Review Planner APPROVED BY: Keith Liden DATE Senior Planner Iar 'SDR025 DD; DIRECTOR'S DECISION SDR 90- 0025 /VAR 90 -0040 NESBITT PACE 14 • BRIGHTFIELD VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM i`b LEI / I /q' L I/ /fie i //lit I/I 1 i I� l' WASHINGTON j I / \`i FAIRVIEW PLACE CONDOMINIUM • A STATE OF OREGON County of Washington City of Tigard AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING v\.., depose and ray: (Please print) That I am a �aitM The City of Tigard, RECEIVED PLANNING FEB 81991 being first duly sworn /af f ixrn, on oath CP 1�r for Oregon. That I >served NOTICE OF PUBLIC REARING FOR: 1/ That I. served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Planning Commission Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard City Council A copy (Public Hearing Notice /Notice of Exhibit "A”) was mailed to each named attached list' marked exhibit "B" on the said notice NOTICE OF DECISION as hereto bulletin board on the 'w day of t in the United States Mail on the '" t postage prepaid. Decision) of which is attached (Marked persona at the address shown on the 1f9+^ day' of 19'' D, attached, was posted on appropriate , 19 11 , and deposited V Prepared Notice Posted For Decision Only „ • _ + abed and sworn/affirm f i, S��tbe�' ` � xm to me on the Verson 4.40 delivered to POST OFFICE Subscfibe'o and sworn /affirm to me . on the 19 ,71 ya. k krb'% ' 4 B; 9 NOT Ry, day o: y PUBLIC OF ORE mission Expires: • day of 4 1 N NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON Icy Commission Expires: Vele 9c/ - 06 ai 1S126BC -00300 ••••.• »••- OLSON, PETER G _' TRUSTEE BY CAPITAL CONSULTANTS 2300 SW FIRST AVE PORTLAND' y Oy ••e O +. •.O OR97201 15126BC- 00500 ♦••y••.y••e OLSON, PETER G — TRUSTEE BY WRIGHTSON, PROPERTIES 520 SW YAMHILL PORTLAND OR 97204 • • •'•• • • 1S126BC- 00701 •'1 r...'• KOWSUN, PETER P AND ELAINE H 7240 SW 84TH PORTLAND 1S126BC -01200 . PANOCC, INC 100 SW HARRISON #200 SEATTLE OR 97223 WA 98119 15126BC- -01000 •�o•••'e •••♦ ♦••.o• WINEAR—PACIFIG INC PO BOX 21545 SEATTLE WA 98111 1S126BC -01504 • ... ♦ • NESBITT PARTNERS PORTLAND VENTUR LTD 924 WESTWOOD BLVD SUITE 905 LOS ANGELES CA 90024 1S126C0 -01200 .••••••.••••o DAYTON HUDSON CORPORATION BY TARGET #345 TAX OPT 14-1 711 NICOLLET MALL MINNEAPOLIS OLIS MN 55402 1S126BC- 01506 PORTLAND OFFICE ASSOC BY;INESBITT PARTNERS 924 WESWOOD BLVD SUITE 905 LOS ANGELES, CA 90024 1S126BC — 01700 GULDEN KEY INVESTORS, LTD BY DREW ' PRELL' & BERNARD ACHAR 11838 BARNARDO` PLAZA CT; #101A` SAN DIEGO, CA 92128 NESBITT PARTNERS PORTLAND VENTURE, LTD 9020 SW WASHINGTON SQUARE ROAD TIGARD, OR 97223 1S126BC- 0040uh. •...• »•• ... OLSON, PETER G — TRUSTEE % AMERICAN OIL CO P 0 BOX 7600 LOS ANGELES 1S126BC -- 00600 ..... CARNIG, JOSEPH C MOCK,' GERALD G 8900 SW HALL BLVD PORTLAND e • • • • O CA 90051 • • • a •' •. • •. • • • ■ • y OR 97223 1S126BC- 01100;••..:- ..e. ♦..•` ♦...•� TEXACO REFINING & G INC MARKETIN ATTN: TAX DEPT PO BOX 7813 UNIVERSAL CITY CA 91608 1S126BC- 01400 •....• .....••..••.: DENNY'S, INC RESTAURANT #1185 BY RASH #200-37-01185 PO BOX 1600 ROWLETT TX 75088 1S126q v� BC -01501 ••e••w••;••s••♦•.••i•• PACIFIC FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSN 801 SW SIXTH AVE PORTLAND OR 9/21B 1S126BC- -01700 .y••.. GOLDEN KEY INVESTORS LTD BY DREW PRELL & BERNARD ZACHARIAS 11838 BARNARDO PLAZA CT, t101A SAN DIEGO CA 92128 KEN EAGON PATRICK M. NESBITT ASSOCIATES, INC. 9020 SW WASHINGTON SQUARE RD TIGARD' OR 97223 MARILYN HARTZELL 10285 SW 70TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 City of Tigard •p.0. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 Ya�.ii- .4.:.,. TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684.0360 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising C] Tearsheet Notice ° 0 Duplicate Affidavit AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, 1, JYlri1 t'h ,T <nPKI P1^ being first duly sworn, depose and sa 4hat G arrr�t!ie Advertising Director, or his principal clerk, of the ._ ga .1,unes a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 and 193,020; published at Tigard in the aforesaid county and state; that the _Laite....Deveinpmen f+ Ravi �z SDI 1��5 �7A 9 r 4SZ a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for_0ne successive and consecutive in the following issues: February 1991 )ss. subscribed and sworn to before ire thia7th day of February 1991 My Commission mission xpire. AlFI'A'al"iT Notary Public for Oregon Legal 11'7823 .., -� ...Mx .r,avrw ew i ��„ .'Gr+tramFf..+sn- w,,.......r•w.�,. SITE: DEVELOPMENT'' 'SDR 90 90- 0040!NESBITT PARTNI 5' PO # 8) :fie D subject to conditions areques for 1) Site De;v'elopm ,to allow construction of; a 11 hotel sulte;additi� n'; to `Hotel, and an aipproximately, ; 0,000 square feet. exp conference facilities ;i'2) r variance to allow`` the 'prso built to 'a height of _a proxrtnately, 82 feed, Whet. Development Code's building height exception pace: mum building' height of /5 feet 3) a variance to al standard length parking spaces to be $ 5 feet in ,`,0/1, requires a minimum, of 9 feet for standard ~Spaces; 'x ailowup' to 35 percent of the, required parking Sdpaces limy spaces for the combined Ei bassy Suites /One E p,lex whereas the Code 'allows a niaxim.um of 25 spaces to be compact part dig - spaces, ZONE: C G (G Location: 9000 S,Sti. Washington Square Road, ( Lots 1,500 and 1 3�i'' r t!1 ° � .r. J zi a! It .�. 1 7 a , ! The adopted finding of facts, decision, and, state el ,obtained from .tile Planning Department; Tigard Clvi, Mill Blvd., POOL Box `25397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. final on February ,20 19 >, Any party to the deei decision irt..aecordance with`Sectidit 1.8.32.290A) a of the. Community Oeveio meat code,, which provi peal may be filed, within 10 days after notice ;is .givci Hinefor'fiil ng.ofan'appeal s53.30'P.M.leer~,i an appeal will be,De Novo, 177823 Publish Feb 'if 7., 1991 re 111111111111 � TIME. PUBLISHING COMPANY �e��w PHONE (60 3) 684-0360 No ice T %� 3 P.O. BOX 370 Pal BEAVERTON, OREGON 97076 ...: -(14' 0(40 ESr3I °r r PA1fl I $s ,N ' 'he Director has a roved subject toaconditions'a regttes i='or'1) ,Sate elopme t Revi! to allow `c nstraction of 1,4', ° lxotel suite: add t on f hey Emb i • to as:' Snxs, Tea�rsheet Notices "' Y l otel, liana u � ap�p oaci!nately.: 0 000s na e`t`met e c Dosed ,, ni.,icitel` Y g conference factixties; ) a uriance to ail w ;the proposed,' El a lditi n to lid k Duplicate Affidavit built to a hei'ght,c f approximately 82 feet, where s th, '. om; nun community Aovelopcnt ni c e's building height exception process, allows fora iaxt y imum building height of 75 feet; 3)' a variance >to ali'ow,a,r ube� of't ier i standard length part ing spaces to. he 8 5' feet in width, whereas the Code Y , irequi res a..'minimnrum ►'f 9 feet fox standard spaces; d 4)' a variance' ,to also , up tc 35,perceot.of th required parking:spaces: to,be compact part 4 ing spaces for tlhe combined E bassy Su tee /Oats Ett` bassy:;Center com- le vh re the AFFIDAVIT e �, d' lo�vs�,ar �'s,�Y.i;�m,��c «�� �per�e�t� �F $ aces to be com "act parlkin s aces Carrie al commercial p gp �,.� E OF OREGON, ). Location; 9000 W. Washington SquareRoa TY OF WASHINGTON, )ss. Lots 00 and 1 i31 T y 4 of Tigard Box 23397 :ard OR 97223 Jodi f Knpii1Pr first duly sworn, depose and sa that I am the Advertising tor, or his principal clerk, of themes spaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193,010 93.020; published at ' Tigard in the said county and state; that the Dpvv 1 n_ pment _galthr s-1/18_9(1:20025.S.6,1_ 90-0040 ted copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the issue of said newspaper for. h1e successive and ,cutive in the following issues: ribed and sworn to before me this 7th d .y of F bruary 1991 rnrbissior DAVIT - kplres; i Notary Public for Oregon /r F41R 1E1Mi'., CONDOMINIUM li 1 $// i � t I 11 i ot The adopted finding of t is t. 2$3914 oisiani r t o " en f co n l sti G obbiained rom the Planning attment Tigard fvic,Cen Wr ° 11 �J ai l fit vd, P,0. Box T t ard Oregon 97223. The decision s 0t 1l be final on,'February;20, Any party` to;''the decision may appeal this decision in accordance With `Section 18.32,290(A) and °Section 1 8.32.370 of the Community Development Cote, which, pros�ides that a W torn ap_ peal may be filed Within 10 days atter notice is given and ,sent, The dead; line for .filing or an appeal is 3,30 p . Febr iar 2f,_119.91, . The 11 lig.on an appeal will be De Novo Tr7823 - Publish Februnty BHP OF Tuwrn, OREGON SITE _ E .t P' II E'V APPLICATION Cif' OF TIGARD, 13125 5V Hail, PAD Box 23397 Tigard., Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171 CENEgAL INFORMATION PROM= r! ADDRM S ILO CA,TIOI!i' gG "goo 5 eV t,t)4. rr.� . 1,6 L TAX , 1AP LND TAX LOT NO SITE SSX Z ` -Jt,. PROPERTY OAIRERi.DiltD HOLDE11 ., 2ss. ol-,:te,,;.;P u4;( UetiFqiy ADDRESS tio2o sal bLJe -t : Rd PHOIE ('/ /W y' 98 'CITY / e. u, c ti ZIP Oft 7 2 ` PEONE is v 8i lso A'PhIPANi* ADDRESS. Wizen. the owner aad the applac "t are different People the applicant must be the purchase= of reCord or a leasee in po$sesslon. with w Lt"teu anthor-izat-,iou f o the owner or an. agnt of the ` °titter vath w.e Itten authorization.. The owner(s) rattst ; sign Oils applzcat� r t spat p on pad, two or 7 an in the �e Provided submit a writ -ten- authorization with this app1 cati ni R gROPOsAL SUMMARY The owaet of record o r ' the subject Property request site deve lopsneut re new s.ppr al to allow r7c .i) /( V fit EekrZetr. / 05.za 4900 .s; ddi O524?/ 3P i- 't 5/87 .r� r 7 FOR STA.F ' USE ONLY Sp/ go- oo (7.A $E O OTC CASE NO'S: REcETIT NO APPLICATION ;ACCEPTr'' BY: DATE :, ;So 161,6 i pp icati on elements .bi . t' ed v-' (A) Applieatiori for (1) ,, --(S) (loner's signature/written authorization (C) Title transfer instrument Cl: vD) A.,ssessor4 s map (1) V (B). Plot plan, ((Pte-app checklist;. (F) Applicant's statement (D eapp checklist) () - . s (H,) Farting fee kz, *1 A te. ) Vor veiolo n 1,/, (I) CO ti..on Cost Estimate 5" 374,0 E DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE: 4 ib FINAL DECISION D LINE COMP, FLAN/ZONE DESTUNAT ON: .0- Num.Der: Approval bate istal Approval Date: Platertitg tag, 11:11 er .Sug ti n,......Y...,. .» i.« atiwi., .....,..a...:r.��- .+.....d.,:.. Liar- ...:i- '.:.- :......4..�+.:.• ;,..C..:6 4 4+:.4nn .n.f.. .rt..:tailw.�n.h�. ;ii i..n��M3.....N44 • List any variance,. cope t cr a1 u1Se . isensitive lands, or other land use actions to be considered As part o this pp .icatio t.: cr i%a ec.. 44/416' as 40 - r - AppLi cis To have a complete application you u111 need to submit amt .c meet described In the attached inf.otmt ±on sheet at the time You submit this application- - THE PLIC (S ) STNAT.T6 CERTIFY THAT:, �Y The above r est do 4Y� �; vlale any deed y es"r L4_onr that n a �. attn.ched to or Imposed upart. the subject property. If the pp + zca tZc r. ° is granted the applicant villa. exercise the rights granted in- accordance T403. the terms and subject ject to all the conditions and limftations of the a7PrOval- All of the above stttemen.ts ; and the statements in the Plot plan, attachments' and a h:L a .ts trianmitted hezewith, are trueg and t lae a pl cnts So acknowledge that an7 permit issued, based ou this a.pplicat;Loi may be revoked fothid. that any stt.c,h statement* are false- . The .ppl Ic -,aut. has read the the Policies and criteria, or deriyimg the Application.. =MIMES S o (kSt: pm/ 05 24p ) DATED this ea ire cunt r is oaf the r p .ilicaticn'g including ant `u derst xds the requirements for approving day or ," ' �i +.r1Y�l�r1! IV Wyt .th owner (egg, htsbaad a 4 tee) of the subjecm prbpertyn 44* Mae r"{? LCti at -# )-.0 s-' t� �4 4€4;)LFerejr$ ilk ^,5" 1:� t r'Y�'i G i e- 4,L)LtGd.'t. V'Gi. C.I i ce..4.1,1 ., 4 44.1 /- h..l'l/ JG►..f�"".T"tiC.:f.fi"S 1 a Patrick M. Nesbitt Associates, inc. 924 Westwood Boulevard, Suit: 905, Los Angeles, California: 90024 213.208.0156 January 7, 1991 Mr. Jerry Offer Tigard City Planning Department 13125 S.W. Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re Parking Requirements Tigard Embassy Suites Hotel EIRCtSTR7rg (JAN1 a 1991 cm OF TIGARI PLANNING DEPTn Dear Mr. Offer, The nine -story Embassy Suites Hotel will contain 358 suites, and approximately 15,000 square feet of meeting room space. The Hotel and office site combined will provide for 620 parking stalls, on-site. Nesbitt Partners, owner and developer of the office building and Hotel, believes and our past experiences support the fact, that the 620 on -site parking stalls will be more than adequate for the Tigard Embassy Suites Hotel and office building. Our determination on the sufficiency of parking is based on: (i) Embassy Suites, Inc. minimum parking requirements; (ii) ,our nationwide hotel development and operation experience; and (iii) the parking analysis based on hotel use components. First, Embassy Suites, Inc.'s minimum standards support that the current on -site parking is adequate. Embassy Suites, Inc. requires that all Embassy Suites Hotels have one parking stall pet- hotel guest suite at the minimum. This standard, like all Embassy Suites standards, is a guideline established to ensure our guests' convenience and satisfaction. Embassy Suites, Inc. is the industry leader in the a,ll- suite market, having over 100 properties in operation across the country, In 1986, Consumer Reports rated Embassy Suites Hotels as having tile highest consumer satisfaction rating of hotel chain. We are proud of this , and minimum parking requirement was not adequate, it would be changed: dastanctlon and of the. Second, our significant experience developing and operating Embassy Suites Hotels all across the country leads us to believe we have provided more than adequate parking: The following Embassy Suites Hotels owed by the Nesbitt organization each contain full. fr 14 4 Mr. Jerry Offer January 7, 1991 Page Two service restaurants, lounges, and conference facilities. I think this will give you a better indication of the adequacy of parking proposed for the Tigard Embassy Suites Hotel and office building: EMBASSY SUITES NUMBER OF PARKING STAZLS/SLJ PROPERTY SUITES STALLS RATIO Houston, TX 243 235 .96 Colorado Springs, CO 207 243 1.17 Bellevue, WA 240 301 1.25 Cincinnati, OH 240 352 1.47 Livonia,, MI 240 328 1.37 * Property constructed prior to implementation of Embassy minimum parking requirement. The Tigard Embassy Suites Hotel will have 375 surface parking spaces on site with 358 suites. Although this is a 1.05 stalls /suite ratio, the shared parking with the adjacent office will bring the total parking up to 620 stalls. This will provide for more than adequate parking as discussed above. The third factor supporting the sufficiency of our parking is based upon shared parking between synergistic commercial uses. I have provided an analysis of the parking requirements for the Tigard Embassy Suites Hotel and office building based upon the Urban Land Institute handbook, 'Shared Parking' and our experiences operating Embassy Suites Hotels: As the chart indicates, there is a'signit ` significant overlap � en the different leant amount of overla t�etwe uses (meeting rooms, guest rooms, lounge, and restaurant) within the Hotel. Quite often, guests staying at the Hotel are there to use the meeting room facilities, and they also frequent the restaurant and lounge during their stay. Local group meetings will often use g Thus, many than one of the Hotel's amenities the restaurant or lounge. Thus 'tna..n visitors utilize more tha onany given therefore, proper parking analysis must a �. this shared use. As the enclosed chart indicates, the existing on -sate parking is more than adequate to support the Hotel based upon an 100% room occupancy. As an additional measure of conservatism, the enclosed parking analysis does not take into account, but robabl.. should, the fact that some guests staying at the Hotel will be probably � g conducting business in the adjacent One Embassy Center office,' This will serve to further reduce the actual parldng'demand. . r+ .4 +,.::.�..wN,,....,r,....,s ..::.. ia�.: ,�."«a;..:.9�...u.4..,.- .I ;.u.... ,4 ..�.,w:a',..5..:�.:! Mr. Jerry Offer January 7, 1991 Page Three As we discussed, the parking stall size requirements of Tigard are larger than Washington County. All of our existing parking spaces are 7.5' x 15' (compact) or 8' x 18' (full- size). We would like to enlarge these existing stalls, but we are constrained by the need to maximize our parking space count. Per our discussion, we would suggest our entire site, parking stall sizes to be as follows: SIZE NO. OF SPACES 8'x 15' 1,34 x 15' 82 8.5' x 18' 227 9' x 18' 158 9' x 18' H.C. 14 10'x20' 5 620 Total 110 p e th a t this letter and the enclosed parking rking an y l : provide you with a thorough understanding of the adequacy of parking provided at the Tigard Embassy Suites Hotel. If you have any questions, or if we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, PATRICK M. NESI3UUI x ASSOCIATES, INC. Doug Gomk;tocic Vice President of Design and Construction cc: Gary Gray Enclosures (T grarkkjiGDO) 01/07/91 File <PMNA/TIGPARK1)3 ,PARKING CHARACTERISTICS OF HOTEL AND OFFICE BY COMPONENT for - Tigard Embassy Suites Hotel & One Embassy Centre Room Count Rest /Lounge Sqft. Meeting Sqft. 358 5700 _ 15000 EXISTING Res taurant /Lounge; Meeting HOTEL OFFICE TOTAL Guest Rooms Facilities* Facilities* --`- Total Spaces 89,000 sq ft OFFICE Spaces Spaces Per Spaces per 1,000 Based on 4.0 per 1,000 + Required'. Sq.Ft. Net Useable Square Feet 100.00% 245 required HOTEL - -- - - - - -- Room:Occ. * ** Hour of Day Weekday Factor Weekday Factor. Daily Factor Factor 6:00 am 358 1.00 11 2.0 - - 369 0.03 7 377 7:00 am 304 0_85 11 2.0 - - 316 0.20` 49 365 8 :00 am 233 0.65 11 2.0 150 10.0 394 0.63 154 548 9:00 am 161 0.45 11 2_0' 150 10.0 323= 0.93 228 550 10 :00 am 125 035 1' 1` 2.0 225 15.0 362 1.00 245 607 11 :00 am 125 0.35 17 3.0 225 15.0 367 1.00 245 612 12:00 Noon 125 0.35 29 5-0 225 15.0 379 0.90 221 599 1:00 pm 107 0.30 40 7.0 225 15.0 372 0.90 221 593 2:00' pm 107 0.30 34 6.0 225 15.0 367 0.97 238 604 3:00 pm 125 0.35 31 5.5 225 15.0 382 0.93 228 610 4:00' pm 161 0.45 29 5.0 225 15.0 415 0.77 189 603 • 5:00. pm 215 0.60 40 7.0 225 15.0 480 0.47 115 595 6:00 pm 251 0.70 51 9.0 225 15.0 527 _ 0.23 56 583 -7 :00 pm 269 0.75 57 10.0 225 15.0 551 0.07 17 568 8:00 pm 304 0_85 57 10.0 225 15.0 586- 0_07 17 603 9:00° pm 340. 0_95 57 10.0 150 10.0 547 0.03 7 554 10 :00 pm 358 1.00 51 9,0 150 10.0 559 0.03 7 567 1 Y Ar d'et Pi f• 24virekwaxi Boulevard, Stride 905„ L o Age C Ef omiz' .90024 2232086 DeGoobei- 28, 19 9 r AXE _ Jerry Offer Tigard City plann ing DePartment 13125 S. W. Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 1 _ Dear Mr.. Of=er Nesbitt Partners, owner : of the EMbassy Stites Hotel, hereby q City of Tigard review and approve a height requests that Vie. variance for the expansion of the Embassy Suites Hotel. As you will recall from our last meeting, we ; i1? add an eight story, 1134, - story„ 2.0,000 square foot The a one expansion •. � meeting dro�a i space ion�,b ve suite and meeting room space addition will be ooi meci d to the existing nine story Embassy Suites Hotel. Based on our discussions; with. you, it appears as though the existing �ate� arC`the addition would e x ceed tie City of Tigard height. limits E approximately seven feet. We ar.-1, s cn tt ng our r.cIaest for a height variance based on the following items 1 ) The ex sting Eubassy' Suites Hotel was built. unincorporated Wash. r,g tan Coaun ty. erle are no height 1i m tat 019.S imposed? by Wash i iagton County as each project is reviewed on an individual basis. v From a structural ral engineering and construction standpoint, we must dr.! l±cate the structural. system of g p F ' buildings be attach +� d ors. iz�as. �ot�i � • Since the h��w� �t•�ll to each other, it is essential to address the seismic and other contraction and structural Considerations Fro an aesthetic s andp oint, lie building needs to be the same height fr m bottom and at each floor level in order „t.. �o achieve a cont ors /f( 1 ✓"`ad KX,. ivtt Mr. Jerry Offer December 28, 1990 Page Two n, City Imposed height l mite t'! oils are designed to co/....rol deli ty . Oar project , includes eight floors that are 8'- 5 1/2" tall and a ground floor t- .at is 14 feet from. floor to floor. This high floor to floor area on the fight floor is ;necessary for all of the mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems. The net effect of such a high floor to floor area on the first floor is that the actual dens: of -film project ; is less. 5.) Our Embassy Suites .'Hotel sits on a recessed. site. The finished floor of the existing Hotel sits below the grade level of the surrounding Hall. Boulevard and rear access drive. T his gives a � " m pressIon of a much shorter building. The enclosed photos will illustrate this point. As you are aw' e, the entire Nesbitt parcel which, includes the Embassy Suites Hotel, the new One E ►assy Center office building, and the p `" to the expansion to the h we intend �.rc��.. on which ].ginned to � accommodate this level of de�r�l was originally p site plan was to have the Embassy. suites eI o �ment _ The original' Hotel, a 10-story office I buildi .gr and a Hampton InA of approximately Qatel y 310 ' rooIS _ N oY r versus a free standing Hampton we are addin g a prox ; nat e.1y a same' number of units 4a the existing Embassy Suites Hotel. We locok forward to your ;review` and approval of this variance request as soon, a.s possible;. It is our intention, to commence building in early 1991. .. , I can assistance, you any ior= _ or if �' If do not�h.eshate. to contact me. an, c�,u.e s-� �a� be r� _ any 'please Sincerely PAIRIC ': NPBITT ASSOCIATES, INC Doug Com to Vice President of Design mid Con ?traction co Gary Cray Enclosures ti l.. 1512680 -00300 .«eae••••«•••• OLSON, PETER G TRUSTEE BY CAPITAL CONSULTANTS 2300 SW FIRST AVE PORTLAND OR 97201 1SI26BC -00500 ••Yr «, «•• • «•.• OLSON, PETER G - TRUSTEE BY WRIGHTSON PROPERTIES 520 SW YAMHILL PORTLAND OR 97204 1S126BC -00701 •...•.•.... ... • KOWSUN, PETER P AND ELAINE H 7240 SW 84TH PORTLAND OR 97223 1S126BC- 01200 `.• •..•..''•.. «..•.a PANOCO, INC 100 SW HARRISON #200 SEATTLE WA 98119 1S126BC -01000 . • .. . WINMJfAR— PACIFIC INC PO BOX 21545 SEATTLE •.•• WA 98111 15126BC -01504 ..o.• «o. » «.. NESBITT PARTNERS PORTLAND VENTUR LTD 924 WESTWOOD BLVD SUITE 905 LOS ANGELES CA 90024 1S126C0 -01200 Y «tlb• «b•be « «, DAYTON HUDSON CORPORATION BY TARGET #345 TAX DPT 14-1 777 NICOLLET MALL MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 • li q 1S126BC-0040 ••••.••e• ••. .••♦ V OLSON, PETER TRUSTEE • AMERICAN OIL CO P 0 BOX 7600 LOS ANGELES CA 90051 1S126BC -00600 ..• ••,•..• .. . CARNIG, JOSEPH C MOCK, GERALD G 8900 SW HALL BLVD PORTLAND OP, 97223 1S126BC- 01100 i« «••• «s., .•..... «. TEXACO REFINING & MARKETING INC ATTN: TAX DEPT PO BOX 7813 UNIVERSAL CITY CA 91608 1S126BC -01400 . . . . • • • • • • • • • DENNY'S, INC RESTAURANT #1185 BY RASH #200«37 -01185 PO BOX 1600 ROWLETT TX 75088 1S126SC•- 01501' «.. .....•••••••••• PACIFIC FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAM ASSN 801 SW SIXTH AVE PORTLAND OR 97218 .. 18126BC -- 01700. ....... .... • GOLDEN KEY INVESTORS LTD BY DREW PRELL & BERNARD ZACHARIAS 11838 BARNARDO PLAZA CT, #101A SAN DIEGO CA 92128 • SEE MAP Si 1 260 100 SEE ,,,: MAP, .. IS 1 26B0 SUPPLEMENTAL I MAP NO. t 1400 rrc Ac. SEE MAP IS 1 2660 SUPPLE MENTA OAP W0,1 rya 70r(' J t 114 its r/j .4+ 1'u Y g.I POft ASSES LNt PU b0 W07 OTHER, USE., °17.12 ce 1200. ,.s: ret At, CANC[4kD TAX LOTS IOOO tOl11101A7021 Ik001 4t04,100d,� f041W4�110�011 1 1102 i 44021 {01,1100, 110 { 1 V4OO,IO011O0,{00■{00. 40041102 11001 t100 ,1 {05, 1002,1110,1101, zAS CENT S$ XilI 25 -64 Ig0 FIRST Abb1710N 0 150 ' 70 CRESCENT GROVE CEXETEkY. CRESCENT GRbVE% 60 oEMIETER? r a T { {w w I ro - '141,11`,14,- At!. p a xi'ee t �6,y1 cN INj. idkO I� b (Cs 14 Ms) i +1[TCN Eoh ASSESSMENT Pl1hFOSES ONLY bo Not RELY oN FOR ANY OTHER USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION FILE NO.: SDR. 90-- 0025 / VAR 90 -O040 FILE TITLE NESBITT PARTNERS APPLICANT: NESBITT PARTNERS PORTLAND VENTURE , LTD OWNER SAME 9020 SW WASHINGTON SQUARE ROAD TIGARD, OR 97223 AGENT: MR. KEN EAGON PATRICK M. NESBITT ASSOCIATES, INC 9020 SW WASHINGTON SQUARE ROAD TIGARD, OR 97223 REQUEST ZONE LOCATION Applicant requests Site Development Review to allow development of a 113 room addition to the Embassy Suites Hotel and an approximately 10,000 square foot expansion to the Hotel's conference a facility. Applicant also requests Variance approval low for a bu,Lilding height of approximately 82 feet Pp y whereas the Code allows for a maximum building height of 75 feet. ZONE: C-G (General Commercial) LOCATION: 9000 SW Washington Square Commercial) Road (WCTM 1S1 26BC, tax lots 1500, 1503). COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: C-G (General Commercial) NPO NO. NPO CHAIRPERSON: Marilyn Hartzell PHONE NUMBER: 245-6299 CHECK: ALL WHICH APPLY X STAFF DECIS €ON COMMENTS ARE DUE BACK TO STAFF ON 1990 . PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: CITE' COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING; TIME REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ATTACHMENTS XX VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPING PLAN XX NARRATIVE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN XX SITE :PLAN XX OTHER: GRADING' & UTILITY PREPARE FOR PLANNER APPROVAL: XX ADVERTISEMENT - TIGARD TIMES XX NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS TO BE MAILED LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE OF APPLICATION ,. NOTICE TO DLCD -- ATTACHMENTS: STAFF CONTACT: Ron Pomeroy OREGONIAN ., " e4 < •T ��U 1501 Ac o, sue` E -e 36 Ac. SEE MAP IS I 26BC SUPPLEMENTAL MAP _NO.1 N59:7f O I a► f t 1 506 2_QBAc. TALL r OTTED -r WI YAC 13 / 341C FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY. NOT RELY ON FOR ANY SHO OTI IE R USE THE : -;.;^ .+TV MAP I/4 - _ - 5. 87? 2 :'3Cr €. 650.91 Y REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: Januar 9 1991 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 90 -0025 VARIANCE VAR 90 -0040 NESBITT PARTNERS (NPO #8) A request for Site Development review to allow development of a 113 room addition to the Embassy Suites Hotel and an approximately 10,000 square foot expansion to the Hotels conference facility. Also requested is Variance approval to allow for a building height of approximately 82 feet whereas the Code allows for a maximum building height of 75 feet. ZONE: C-G (General Commercial) LOCATION: 9000 SW Washington Square Road (WCTM 1S1 26BC, tax, lots 1500 & 1503) Attached is the Site Plan and applthant's statement- for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Jan. 22, 1991. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. Lou are unable to respond bar the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as Possible. If you have any ,questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: Ron Pomeroy PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THATAPPLY» We have reviewed the proposal and 'have no objections to it. Please contact of our of fice. Please refer to the enclosed letter, written comments: �Taime of ,Person Commenting: Phone Number bkun /SDR9 ©--2 5 . BKM icw w NPO NO. '.FICATION LIST FOR ALL APPLICATT, CPO RO. (2 cop ies) CITY' DEPARTMENTS Building Inspector /Brad R. City Recorder E.gineering /Gary A. ermits Coordinator /'Viola G. SPECIAL D RIOTS Fire District (pick -up box bldg.) Tigard Water District 8777 SW Burnham St. Tigard, OR 97223 Metzger Water ' District 6501 SW Taylors Ferry Rd. Tigard, OR 97223 AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS Wash- Cc- Land Use & Tranap. 150 N. First -Ave- Hillsboro, OR 97 124 Brent Curtin Martin Joann Rice Scott King Fred Eberle Mike Borreson, Jim Hendryx City of Beaverton PO Box 4755 Beaverton, OR 97076 State Highway 7DiviSion Lee Gunderson PO Box 565 Beaverton, OR 97075 is s w .. • w •. •.♦ s s. s s s• w ♦ is is w s s s. s.. s• 5. SPECIAL AGENCIES General Telephone Mike Lutz 12460 SW Main St. Beaverton, OR 97007 ,• Natural Gas Don Thomas 220 NW Second Ave. Portland, OR 97209 Parks & Recreation Board Police Other School Dist. No. 48 (Beaver) Joy Pahl. PO Box 200 Beaverton, OR 97075 School District 23J (Tig) 13137 SW Pacific Hwy. Tigard, OR 97223 Boundary Commission 320 SW Stark Room 530 Portland, OR, 97204 METRO 2000 SW 1st Ave.' Portland, OR 97201. --5398 DLCD (CPA's only) 1175 Court St. NE Salem, OR 97310 --0590 Other . s . d ♦ • . • o . • ■ . i . is is is • • w s • r • • s w . . . • . s i • TCI Cablevision Of Oregon, Inc., 3500 SW Bond Portland, OR 97201 — ortland General Electric Brian Moore 14655 SW Old Scholia Ferry Beaverton, OR 97007 Metro Area Communications Harlan Cook Twin Oaks Technology Center 1815 NW 169th Place 8 -6020 Beaverton, OR 97006 -4886 US 'West' Pete Nelson 421 SW Oak St. Portland, OR 97204 Mike' Ballot) Q. 0 STATE AGENCIES NOT.LST Aeronautics Div. (ODOT) Engineer Board of Health Fish & Wild3 ife Paarks &.Recrea. Div. Subdivision Supervisor. Dept. of Energy Dept. of Environ. Quality DOGAMa Division of State Lands Commerce Dept. -M.H. Park LCDC PUC Fire Marshall Other FEDERAL AGENCIES Corps. of Engineers Other Post Office OTHER Southern Pacific Transportation Company Duane M. Forney, PLS Project Engineer 800 NW 6th Avenue, Rm. 324, Union Station Portland, OR 97209 N x o c i `t - E„ c P ? w P Ylvi 1 " " P I „ , ' bL to '17 Y ; D a � T "ASH A `36OUN "i 1. I3 " WOOD rl,,,E►" TWO I t) £ IDP 144D 1 E. P ` Y V tin InY"I+YWI,PMr MNYNiWMWNWMiYro,NIMN!YNiMWNI IMXIMI ,r!'�+�NN"f11YYMWkfMMYYI�Ypif TOT ,r; .y,WyN 1!n!4y'r,vv+r„rrwG'M*,*n'M . ti- .mw. ^'s,.. ^r. vr..'m,, -« w ..,a v.... ✓,»r., »; :a+r* rr v, «a..« .�I. a.w,w ,w.wr�r~;- «„w.., w.•.�,���. ...ran. rr....+- :+Xw.+... -i ,,,,, x r+ • k Y.. I r. �N, FMi1,,,,, ..,t i ...,,, 'ra .f 4':r ! CwF ,I.- '().'N i 1L.alt •� f; ar �,1 T, «„ ��al1r � l �k ' ' , 1 1 .14i; sq v+e': 1 ri,.. I,ra it i Yl. Y w a . ( +p J s N l "„b L lv" S.ru01.,i1:',,r , rr ... r.'w #+�; '�. ,�rC ;.��rt .rXn Y'. ai? p� viii} 1 „'i 1:2; w..m !.. yl "i.v .r.0 y,> r�', ert� �r.,:� t+ , -�r y+,� f r } i, 1 y k�1 t 1s>j f. 0 E't r,tt,:. k,, '� n ,, (( � i . , y ] { 4 i. S J �, �. Y : rMn11 n A -' % vtli.v 0 Y,.r n. w�i.� ,�. rltry f „�,. d n,. ,..A �'�' ,i'.`�� +�1 � j h,Lr•1 {{ tr pp1yyr q��� M d t.o -. ti .1 S' �:C 'S.�' { i p {' �y f`',11,,' � l�wv..8„ F.” r ,�.F� a4A` .T, ;,i A, !1.76 , �, 9...Ci w �"';, .�.:, SN..'i;. Fr +t y.• a S rit: ! t.ry, t+? n i, t �X t • „ ( t v* � A � N 1 riAA ?. t fl ',.1 ,'' „ t 4111;7; 'w;t 1 t o ! , yes y� . 1 1 p 1 r � � i,A�;�.«,, a�� w' Y`t ,s�u � �'d �, �vJ°' � .3.a� "��� �,�3�� " ".. ����"" 1 �'i ➢` �`I���t,�!�� r���,���.f� *•� i� � "' �r M rlfyd,+w,ii. ry+.n,rr1 «... xtr.l+•w»� «�+..w,r.«H *,yn ,N.YMYNir:,MY f,drd1M jl •N 10, rNfiNirl MYdN+,fhr }Y4 d "�el`i t';A61 'Y`1' Ir is ': TI( Va Hall BIVd; )X 23397 egon 97223 „TA A W.V4Y Ftc'iWAR 0 V lltlER y tj C"?.nrc 'c ' f;. 4 y Sy 26AC""0120 • r..'n u • • i w M e.. • e • . • e PMIOCO s INC 100 SW HARRISON #2013kti 98119 SEATTLE 90 go A-1 o c)(2)q"0 4a7 la ‹SAJC't:ZZ9 /j1650? i,� yea November 8, 1993 CUY of TIGARD OREGON Lisa R. Spanburg Gosnell near. Corp. of Arizona 2728 N. 24th Street Phoenix, Arizona 85008 Dear Ms. Spanburg ,t This is to serve as authorization for American Motorists Insurance Company to release the $50,000 bond for landscaping and parking lot pavement held for :the City of Tigard for the Embassy Suites development ( SDI. 90 -0025 /VAR 90 -0040 ) please forward this proper American Motorists ' to the ro his Gaut �xe�ri�atax� representative. Sin Richard H ]3ewersdor Senior Planner 13125 SW Hall Blvd,, Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TIC (503) 684- 2772' AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY 7470 NO FIGUEROA —P.O. BOX 41375 -LOS ANGELES, CA 90041. -1091 213-257-8291 FRIDAY JANUARY' 2,j994 SUBDIVISION STATUS I'NQUIRY TO: CITY or TIGARD (OR ) 1.3125 S.W. HALL BLVD. TIGARD,, OR 97223 .BOND NUMBER':!': 3SM 773 _941, 00 SUDDT \' I OLR : GOr NULL BUILDERS TRACT /IMPROVEMENTS: LflU JONES & ASSOCIATES P.C. BOX 41375 LOS ANGELES, CA 90041 < < ENVELOPE ENCLOSED BOND AMOUNT: 50000 • 00' TIGARD EMBASSY SUITE HOTEL/ LANDSCAPING & PARK.t:NG LOT IMPROVEMENT REQUESTED BY: CHRISTOPHER JOHN RIZZOTTI Z ZOTT'I (BOND DEPARTMENT) * * * * * *' * * * * * * ), * * * * * * * * PLEASE ANSWER QUESTIONS BELOW, AND RETURN THIS FORM ♦ HAS THIS WORK BEEN FULLY COMPLETED & ACCEPTED 'y YES , C s NO ( ) 2. IF ACCEPTED, ON WHAT DATE ? lit? . ?7¢1 3. IF NOT ACCEPTED, IS WORK PROGRESSING SATISFACTORILY'? YES (.) NO ( ) 4. IF NOT ACCE PEED , PERCENTAGE COMPLETED ? .. ... o * * * *'* * k * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *'* * * * * * * * REMARKS * * * * * * -'.* * * * * * * *, * k *. * *.' * * * * * * * ' k * * k * * * * * * * Cirt, PLAAWE4 ABOVE INFORMATION FURNISHED B Y : . • • • (TITLE) 'GNAT r �7 j, DATE //f /y�',i -°' c 37 -9-17/ AE'.8S'yA .l U R E DA 1 E 1 ii a• i ( 5 � { i ♦ 6 . J i + • n i . i. i a ♦ s • r '6' • A i , • i . u • •. • n i u r n .. • . ♦ r! a a. il' ♦ r.. (PRINTED NAME) (PHONE) (SIGNATURE) LA is • 11/05/93 08:49 1'5°602 954 0597 GOSNELL PHOENIX 444 CITY OF TIGARD a 001/003 CQSNELL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OP ARIZONA. 2728 N. 24th Street Phoenix, Arizono 8500$ Td: 6021956 -4300 Fax: 602/954-0597 FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION NOTE; THIS IS A CONFIDENVTiAL AND PRIViLEGED COMMUNICATION. ° This transmission is intendeei cant efce the use applicable the individual l reader entity to which it la addressed, and contains confidential information that is privileged and exempt . from disclosure of this message is not the intended recipient, Or the employee or agent rasp/21)6021.310r delivering the message to the Intel-Kidd recipient, you are hereby notified 'that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited, If you have received this communication y y P g rigliial message to us et the address shown via the U.S. Mall, in error, pleh�a notify us irnrnddiet ®L by telephone �¢ tee hone and return the o .� TO: CITY OF TIGARD PAGE 1 OF: AT'T It DIANNE FROM; Lisa R. Spanbitrg Legal Assistant MESSAGE: DA' NOV 4 1993 i have attached a copy of out bond to the City of Tigard regarding the landscaping and pail i ng lot pavement of the Embassy Suites Hotel. As we have discussed, this project is long over and we would like to release this bond Your assistance is appreciated. If you have further questions, please do not hesitate to call. Thanks again; `',' tr s tl~ O Mee t ral�le�rie with th L,:.._ ps tr�siinitse�s� please caul 602/956u43Up icir a sL tr I T'hairAk ou 1105/93 08 50 '602 954 0597 GOSNELL PHOENIX 44- CITY OF TIGARD Z002/003 i ; ,,,;6140 Na zee x rt4 �® uu L ' " ?rem; * e O . MVO yreZ KNOW ALL MEN BY imam PResarrs, T'hbt WW C a�a11 �us�.as a is mow, 2728 N®. 24th St. s Pt10•11,1JC r j/�q gag e cif to ilai��i V� &earatr utlt1�2 I111.110111 CorpOra0001 1011011611 le 42 Mahan In tna Stem et Oregon. !haring an otl1oe apd plebe et tu'siness at 1470 14" 8 �0� Aa e1�e A BursT/, Aut held and f1rm1y ba+urd unto tn4 P ot Tipe m. t!►s ium d? !fifty thausaud J[lnt4 tin / lOn Dow,Fie, 5O p OOA a b0 of the unind Stole, for the pbyima ?t whereat te the Mgt ► of Tigtudi the Prinolpti and the Swett bind thermaelweei mak helrys 4a +1e % sdrnQrasteetare, WOOSSOreo end Otely end Severally, *WY 1d tna$e presents: Ttlg 99110119M or 'ma tiONo I oucH T 1WWEREAS, oppOrMion was mods to the a + TVA tor aPProvai ®i 112111.221111110atategla drhlati was cowed open terttdn aandltior+ad j t p f t1 1 b 4lERr the Y4n1e"1t1► * be vonelru�Dtid In f � e des+nlO en ©nt Ara Ism ��� eeted the r 1v use ct the , Ord the P O 's desire Xi ts�u City � p+srnr #t l esa a c°P'' P"a�'r1i P� 'Palteet the pubfte In1ernat by leg* enl rveabfe eieurences that the lmprovemeflh* will be lnat*led requlr d end 4s+mpieted *thin iirne ttarsinif1et set tqha. r TH oN lTN OF NIB � tiegloti h sucN that I( the above Wield Ptihei0ti she the drs a hsreef r+4U itnd vuly fnsr r 094 1" Yte OHO tlid IMPS �tonis rrs a et tide r u rt p irn me in a Ce with me Orly era ,Tied 11006111111Ortt �d�Ii f a 10 fra 01110 9100001$0 10 ritith 1411 to and atfaz h d1tRe�tie # utodlisro�, 44$0004 T e P e1 herein shell 1 l end *Iale�e +can and rfiqutretuente of of gta �t i ►l r ' w+ott+ 'sr the o lte 0600111W. ee n t to n Whfijily 'woo suttee a et, ` Ata nttor fY Laid as s ��ttrlsa tts � �TIud Ia e rsi 46I4 cod e10044 ill *Mks 00 144 Q4 p0Pe tikittiV.be qtr rdutl �.qf �but A�M dpers�on� �nd��vle +ary. inet ,p®rrt► 4. .4 604 401,■••,‘,1#,i000110 -011.1016000041110,11011/1110 4 11/95/93 08:50 73602 954 0597 * * EIS' nbd 10101 N..n.i+.wYr: GOSNELL PHOENIX 444 CITY OF TIGARD Z003/093 Wit beratri understood end !steed Olet In Me event Met any tegUL:tid lelpievemeele navO rot Won u presatberi within the ermo of to foodonfilroO0 bond. the air of tows may thereupon daoibra this bolldt 10 be in default and OW a cum rogJnen0 p *ytbi, 0561murvief Ids t receipt of the pmt* 4s lhevof the City Of Tigard shelf insteX web Impro•entents SW ant mitred by this band and entnohenettrotto with the 446n1 Qt dowallogeneot mat Pm teen Oda but eat exceedrr ,g the woof of skth prooncti. Slailetto i At eo, AND GATED. trig 11" day of r 9 Ame ricata ?llotraists O '30111 773 941 00 d Ga u.11 Eu ,ldsrs P'Iph(p Itimmommer 'b it 1 i J PiAnabid' INtiLI ANCI eamPANY Sbupp ATTOANO,Y-IN-FACT . 9 •i View text of highlighted conditir OaSITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEWaaaaaak aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ' . .Jaaaaaaaaaa • SDR90 -- 0025`: PROJECT:NESBITT PARTNERS STATUS:P : UPD:01/03/91: :RP • AP PLICANT:NESBITT ASSOCS., INC. PRIM... SDR90 -0025: • SITE ADDRESS:9000 SW WASHINGTON SQUARE DR OaCONDITIONS FOR CASE SDR90- 00256a5,aaaaa a. aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa .aaaaaaaaa6.6 • # -- Title Stat Date By Updated ° o 1) REVISED SITE PLAN 30 / / 02/08/91 RP • 2) SAN. & STORM DRAINAGE DETAILS CD / / 02/08/91 RP 3) FEE-IN-LIEU & REVIEW 'PUB. IMP. CD / / 02/08/91 RP 4) TIF PAYMENT-04W 0141- CD / / 02/08/91 RP 5) EROSION CONTROL PLAN CD / / 02/08/91 RP 6) AS -BUILT MYLARS- STORM & SAN SEWER .i / / 02/08/91 RP 7) RELOCATE PROPERTY LINE CD / / 02/08/91 RP 8) LANDSCAPING INSTALLED /ASSURED JO / / 02/08/91 RP o 9) SIGN PERMITS PRIOR TO INSTALL. RP / / 02/08/91 RP ° " 0 " ° 0 ° ° aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasa3aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaa .aaaaaaaaa.aa.aaa.aaaaaaaaa VIEW ADD INSERT - BEFORE CHANGE DELETE RENUMBER ESC View text of highlighted condition OaSITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEWaaaa.aaaaaa aaaa. aaaaaaaaaaaa .aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.aa o :SDR90 -0025: PROJECT:NESBITT PARTNERS : STATUS P UPD :01 /03/91: :RP : • APPLICANT NESBITT ASSOCS., INC. PRIM.. SDR90- 0025: • SITE ADDRESS :9000 SW WASHINGTON SQUARE DR OaCONDITIONS FOR CASE SDR90- 002 5aaaaaaa. aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa5 ,aaaaaaaaaad66.6 ° o # - --- Title o 1) REVISED SITE PLAN '--W v' o SAN. & STORM DRAINAGE DETAILS ",p) 3) FEE-IN-LIEU & REVIEW PUB. IMP 4) TIF PAYMENT qt0 i EROS /ON CONTROL PLANT '.,,. 6) AS -BUILT MYLARS- STORM ;& SAN SEWER CD 7) RELOCATE PROPERTY LINE 8) LANDSCAPING INSTALLED /ASSURED 9) SIGN PERMITS PRIOR TO INSTALL. Stat Date - - -- By- Updated- - - - --- JO / / 02/08/91 RP CD / / 02/08/91 RP CD / / 02/08/91 RP CD / / 02/08/91 RP CD / / 02/08/91 RP / / 02/08/91 RP CD / / 02/08/91 RP JO / / 02/08/91 RP RP / / 02/08/91 Rte,., ° a ° aaaaaa : aaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaa.aaa.aaAaaa aaaaA AA 6aa. aaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa:aaaaaaaaAaadai VIEW ADD INSERT- BEFORE CHANGE DELETE RENUMBER ESC View test of highlighted condition OaSITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEWaa666a6. 66aaa66666666aa6aaaaa46a6a .aaaaaa6aaaaaaaaa66,aa0 • :SDR90 -0025: PROJECT:NESBITT PARTNERS STATUS:P UPD :01/03/91 :RP o APPLICANT:NESBITT ASSOCS., INC. PRIM.. :SDR90 -0025: o SITE ADDRESS :9000 SW WASHINGTON SQUARE DR OaCONDITIONS FOR CASE SDR90-00256a. 46,6.6aaaa aaaaa6aaa .aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa60 o Title - - Stat 'Date -- -- By- updated -. 1) REVISED SITE PLAN JO 02/08/91 RP 2) SAN. & STORM DRAINAGE DETAILS CD / / 02/08/91 RP hze. b 4-671 )11 h-f-oz b 4z+/1 )1t 414+ .4 Si .4-h14-2 ,r. V December 4, 1991 Mr. Ed Murphy, City Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 RE: .Temporary Certificate of Occupancy Portland Embassy Suites Hotel Expansion is WINDSOR CAPITAL GROUP; Dear Ed, Contra to our letter dated November 22, 1991, Nesbitt Partners Portland Venture, Ltd., will be the party responsible for any costs associated with the sewer surcharging mitigation in connection with the Portland Embassy Suites Hotel Expansion. This will be in effect until the sewer line installation has been approved. We apologize for any misunderstanding. Sincerely, WINDSOR CAPITAL GROUP K Duane Brelsford Project Manager (Murp12O4 PORTLAND) WINDSOR. CAPITA L, CROUP 6320 Canoga Avehue, Suite 1620, Waodittrfd 11i1'1s, CA 91367 (818)715-1991 Pax (818) 715.1952 [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing]