The URL can be used to link to this page

SDR1990-00022POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. STATE OF OREGC' County of Washington City of Tigard I, AOLCYVA Oikeeur , being .irst duly sworn /affirm, on oath depose and say: (Please print) That I am a 6...22cciu__42.5.15ka4At for The City of Tigard, Oregon. That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: / That I served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: ../'City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Planning Commission Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard City Council A copy (Public Hearing Notice /Notice of Decision) of which is attached (Marked ,� list exhibit "B" on the _-`' day of � U.ew>'I(` 19 -7 i attached h") marked eXd to each named persons at the address shown on. Exhibit A was mailed the said notice NOTICE' OF DECISION as hereto attached, was posted on a appropriate bulletin board on the S4"'day of 4GC 11-1 -0- t- 192.11_-; and deposited in United _ on the me!^ day o f euVI /A the Uni�.pd Status �2ai1, r postage prepaid: 7 0 pa & r Notic-. Posted` 4For Decision Only) Subscribed and sworn/affirm to me on the day of NO ARY PUBLIC OF OREGON ,. My commission Expires: on o delivered to POST sFFICE NOTARY PUBLIC OFD OREGON My Commission Expired: /6' j[[ P- A14,10 i* A CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF ' DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 90 -0022 VARIANCE VAR 90-0033 LINCOLN VIII PARTNERS APPLICATION: (1) A Site Development Review request by Lincoln VIII Partners to allow construction of an approximately 140,000 square foot, seven -story office building and a three-level parking structure; (2) a Variance to the 45 foot height limit for buildings in the C -P zone is requested to allow the proposed office building to be 92 feet tall; and (3) Variances are, also considered to reduce the required compact parking space widtk from, 8.5 feet to 8 feet and to allow up to 35 percent of the required parking spaces to be provided to be compact spaces whereas the Community Development Code allows a maximum of 25 percent of required spices to be compact spaces. ZONING: C -P (Commercial Professional). LOCATION: Southeast corner of SW Greenburg Road and SW Locust Street (WCTM isi 35AB,'Tax Lot 100). DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director's designee for the city of Tigard has APPROVED the above described requests subject to certain conditic'.ns. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted below. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Background 1987. In 1987 y the City of Tigard in April, annexed to ' The subject ub7oct p ro ert the Tigard City Council approved rezoning of the annexed area from Washington County's '0--C (Office Commercial) Zoning designation to the City's C-P (Commercial, Professional) zone. The subject parcel was already developed with the Lincoln Savings building and a surface parking lot. The subject parcel is located in the northwest corner of what is known as the Lincoln Center. The City has reviewed numerous other land use and development applications for the Lincoln Center development, but none that have dealt directly with the subject parcel except for a redsnt Minor Land rIrtition application, MLP 90 -0022, which approved dividing the J p 1000, into three pa.-cele containing 44,856, Subject arcel, tax lot 1 " 67,283, and 74,759 square feet. That application, waa approved on November 2, 1990. This partition has yet '. to be recorded. A Site Development Review application was approved for construction . y building in (SDR 87-� of the 12 star Lincoln Tower office lau thin �.�� Juno, 1987 08 %V 874 -07) in the southeastern corner of the Lincoln Center. The PP . . to the maximum building height standard a royal included a �rar�.ance t for the zone In June, 1988, the City of Tigard Hearings Officer approved a Conditional Use permit request to allow the oonisstrUdtion of a rooftop heliport on top of the Lincoln Tower offiOe bu lding. NOTICE Or DF;GTSIciM SDR 90-0022 /VAR 90•.0033 LflTCoLN VIII age In May, 1989, the City council approved: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, and zone dhange request (CPA 89 -05 /ZC 8 --05) rezoning the site of the parking garage that was constructed along with the Lincoln 'V office building. The parking garage and Lincoln V are located in the northeastern . corner of the Lincoln 'Center' complex. Construction of Lircoln`V and the parking structure was s a roved. through Site Development Review SDR 89-12 and Variance 11'69-17 in Tune,' 1989. That approval allowed constructionof a 121,000`square foot, 7- story office 'building and :a. 2 -.story parking structure. Also ;approved were a variance to the 45 foot maximum building height requirement in the C-P zone and variances to reduce the 'Parking space width requirement from the standard 9 feet to 8 feet and to allow' 48 p ercent of all parking spaces to be designated as compact spaces rather than the ,permitted, maximum 25 percent compact space allowance. The subject parcel, along with the remainder of the Lincoln Center development, was included within the boundaries of a proposed urban g renewal district through an amendme nt to the Comprehensive Plan policy document (CPA 90 -0001) and development of an urban renewal plan known as the President's Parkway plan. The Comprehensive Plan amendment and urban renewal plan were approved by the city Council in March, 1990 In May 1990, the tax increment finance method of funding public improvements associated with the urban renewal plan was rejected by Tigard voters. In response to this action, the City Council on September 10, 1990 approved CPA 90 -0006 reversing the earlier amendments to the Plan Policy Document. In addition, the Council repealed the President's Parkway urban renewal plan.` Vicinity Information Propertied to the north, east and south of the subject parcel are also zoned C-P. Properties to the east and south are also Part -of the Lincoln Center complex. Lincoln Center' contains a number of office and restaurant buildings. 'Property to the north across Locust has recently Development Review approval for Street ecentl received Site Devel construction of a bank building. Properties to the west across g developed the :Washington gton Oreenbur Road are zoned C-G and are develo ed wa.th thy. C�as�ixn Square shopping center. Site Information and Proposal Description Tax lot 1000 is one of seven parcels that make up the Lincoln Center development. The subject parcel contains the two story Lincoln Saving's building, surface parking for approximately 150 cars, and portions -of main roadways into the development. Lincoln ','Center is presently developed with 'six office buildings and two multi -level p o ains a Parking structures. The Lincoln center develca went also oxxt number of surface parking' lots and private roadways. the total area of the Lincoln Center 'complex is 22.1 acres. The total ;'gross leasable square footage of the sit eisting office buildings is 710,377 square feet. The existing parking hots provide parking tar 2,490 automobiles. NOTICE OF DECISION -SDR 90-0022/VAR 90E- LINCOLN VIII r 0033 L1NG0 image 2 rD 4J' j • The earlier Minor Land Partition approval, (MLP 90-0022) affecting the subject parcel approved division of the Tax Lot 1000 into three parcels containing 44,856 square feet (Parcel 1); 67,283 square feet (Parcel 2); and 74,759 square feet (Parcel 3). The proposed boundary between Parcel 1 and Parcel 3 would cut through the single story western wing of the Lincoln Savings Building. Parcel 1 would also contain a small parking area. The existing parking lot on Locust Street is totally included within Parcel' 2. This partition application was a y j including the FF roved s�.b ect to certain conditions creation of reciprocal access and parking easements amongst these parcels and a declaration by the property owners that would indemnify the city aga.nst legal actions arising from the proposed property line between parcels 1 and 3 cutting through the single story wing of the Lincoln savings Building. The current Site Development Review application proposes construction of an approximately 140/000 square foot, seven-story, 92 foot tall office building on ;proposed Parcel 1 to be created from the prior partition application. The single story western wing of the Lincoln Savings Building would be demolished and the two buildings would be connected. The Lincoln Savings building would include 57,350 square feet after the modification. The proposed new building's main entrance would be oriented to the northeast facing a proposed parking structure to be built on Parcel 2. The application includes " a Variance request to allow the proposed new office building 92 F r.ldr.n to be 9 feet, tall whereas the community Development Code allows a maximum building height of 45 feet (Code Section 18.64.050.A.4). The proposed three-level parking structure, including, parking for 614 cars would :front on Locust Street. One level of the structure would be below grade. The proposed parking structure would replace a 171 parking space surface lot resulting in a net increase of 44:3 parking stalls. The parking structure is to have one entrance directly from Locust Street and two entrances off of the private access road off of Locust Street. The application also request a variance to allow a reduction in the Code ' s compact parlcing s p ace wicih requirement from 8.5 feet (Code Section 18.106.020.A) to permit 8 foot wide spaces. In addition, a variance is considered to allow 35 percent of all parking spades to be designated as compact spaces rather than the permitted maximum 25 percent compact space allowance (Code Section L8.106.040.A 1) The applicant's submittal states that the office building's, design y is intended to harmonize with the building styles and colors of the surrounding Lint -Joln Center buildings. Likewise, the proposed parking garage is to be similar to the a ile a Concrete and brick si�ructure s existing parking garages adjacent to the Lincoln Tower and LLincoln V g d 1 p states that construction of the proposed mid ise building is anticipated to begin in March, H155li with completion expected by November, 1991. NOTICE OP DECISION- -SDR 90- 0022/VAR 90".0033 LINCOLN VIII Page 0. Agency and NPO Comments The Engineering Department has reviewed the proposal and offers the following comments: The seven story office structure will be area that consists mainly `of constructed over an parking spaces and sidewalks; therefore the increase in storm drainage in this area will be negligible. The three story parking structure will be constructed over an existing parking lot area; therefore this also should not increase the storm drainage in this area. The storm drainage is proposed to be collected in the existing system. The impact, if any, should be evaluates? to insure that the increased storm drainage discharge will not impact the properties downstream. The entire drainage basin for this storm drainage system should be evaluated to insure that, with ultimate development, the existing storm drainage system will provide adequate capacity. ii) The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce (Resolution No. 90-43) Surface Water Management Regulations requiring the construction of an -site water quality facilities or. ;fees in lieu of their construction. Requiring surface water,' quality facilities on small sites would rosult in numerous facilities that would become a maintenance burden to the City. Furthermore, the applicant has not proposed any such facilities and, there are no natural depressions or other areas of this site that are particularly suitable for water quality facilities. Regional facilities, funded by'; fees in lieu of construction of these facilities, would provide the required treatment with improved reiiabiltty and less maixitenance. Consequently a fee -in, -Lieu of the construction of on -site water quality facilities should be assessed Sanitary 'Sewers It appears', that adequate sanitary sewer facilities exist to provide service to the seven story offide structure. NOTICE OF DECISION -SDR 90- 0022/VAR 90 -0033 LINCOLN VIII Page 4 ii Streets /Traffic, Z. ) Access -to to the site is provided by S.W. Greenburg Road (a Washington County road) and S.W. Locust Street (a City ,of 'Tigard road). The submitted site ,,plan for Lincoln Eight and the parking structure (3 story) shows two accesses onto S.W. Locust Street; one of which iss a shared .access; plus the S.W. Greenburg Road intersection with the private drive (Maple1eaf Drive) . S.W. Locust Street is a major collector street. The intersection of Locust/Greenburg streets is currently under construction to signalize the intersection and to channelize S.W. ' Locust 'Street. The improvements are scheduled to be completed by the end of February 1991. The current channelization pans call for separate right/left, turn lanes westbound on S.W. Locust acid one eastbound lane with plans for 1 00 feet of 'storage for the turn lanes. The accesses to S.W. Locust Street from the parking garage ,are approximately ,250 feet aprt from centerline to centerline. The access points are also approximately 185 feet 'and 435 feet from centerline ''to centerline of S.W. Greenburg ad. ,Based on the findings from �, eenbur Ro Washington County, it ibi recommsended that the storage'capacity be increased to 200 feat for tqe turn lanes. Ther efore,; the applicant should be rreb ired t gu o work with the Engineering Department to locate the access' points for the parking structure at the most advantageous point. S.W. Greenburg ,Road, provides access to the site from Greenburg onto Locust and the private drive. As part of the improvements' being completed on the Locust, /Greenburg intersection, the left turn lanes fox'' both access points are being improved as far as channelization markings but with no additional ' Storage' capacity. The traffic study submitted, estimates the vehicle trips generated' by t'he :additions to this site to be approximately 995 trips per day. The shady recommends the following Construction of a new entrance to the Lincoln Center development at Mapieleaf Drive with three exit lanes and a straight stacking area,. NOTICE OF CISTOH -«SbR 90- 0022/VAR X90.0033 LINCOLN VIII Page � �' D The development work with Tr-Met to add a bus stop internally to the site along Mapleleaf Drive. The development implement a car- vanpool service for the 'site. The service would match interested employees with others in the development for joint ridership. The development designate convenient parking areas for car and vanpool participants. After extensive review, Washington County has determined that the traffic impacts to Greenberg Road can be accepted if the proposed improvements are made to the Mapleleaf entrance road. Additional striping changes will also be required pp Greenburg on the Locust Street approach to Greenhu Road. We accept and support the County's analysis. There will also be an 9,ncrease in traffic to the east of the site on Locust'` street; however, traffic volumes on Locust are expected to remain well within the traffic capacity of the recently improved street. iii) Washington County has established and the City has agreed to enforce (Resolution No 90-65) Traffic Impact Fees. The purpose of the fee is to ensure that new development contributes to extra- capacity tranaportatiron improvements needed to accommodate additional `raffic generated by such development. The applican` shall be required to pay the fee. B aced on tho following ` information'' the ESTIMATED TRAFFIC IMPACT' FEE for this development Would be 1) Use as defined by applicant: 140,000 square foot General `Office 2) Land Use Category: Office 3) Rate Per Trip: $124.0 4) ITE Category : 712 Weekday average trip rate:: 12.40 per 1,000 gross square feet 6) TIF = 12.40 X 140 x $124.00 = $215,264.00 7) NOTE: The applicant has indicated in the preliminary plans that it ,is their intention CIS .. , 113 LINCOLN VIII' page 6 1WC'!fi'IC� C� b� ��N��sDR 0-0022/VAR 9a -0 to remove an existing one story,, building. Therefore the aforementioned TIF would be adjusted' to reflect this change in use; there would; be a reduction based on size and use. PLEASE NOTE THIS IS ONLY AN ESTIMATE OF THE PROPOSED TIF FEE, THE ACTUAL FEE WILL CALCULATED AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. The actual TIF will be based on the actual building area shown in the FINAL APPROVED DESIGN and the trip rate in effect at the time of building permit application, Washington County's Department of Land Use and Transportation has reviewed the proposal and has offered, the following comments: SW Greenburg Road is a County minor arterial and is 'identified in the Washington_County Transportation Plan as Part of the Countywide Road System. It is the policy of Wash .rbgton 'County to retain jurisdiction of countywide roads, and to ensure that these facilities maintain their function of moving large volumes of traffic. County analysis of the Lincoln Eight propoaal, indicates that SW Greenburg Road can operate at an acceptable level of service if the recommended improvements are installed.' The analysis also makes clear that traffic on SW Greenburg Read is nearing a point where the level of service will be unacceptable. Although this project does not yet "crush" the system, 'the County would like to point out that traffic growth in the Greenburg Road area is of 'serious "public concern, and Should be of concern to the property owners ',of this area: County staff is aware of the potential _for. further intense development by other property owners in this area. This potential future developmentspius the continued' expansion Of, the Lincoln Center site leade the County to believe that it is in the best Private , p P icipate i.nteres�ts of both the r�.g ate and public sec.tors� to art in an area- -wide traffic management study. Washington County recommends3 that the Lincoln Center property owners participate with other major intere 4ts, both public and private, along SW Greenburg Road in an area -wide study of future .traffic derttands ► paw cb lem0 ► and ne deasary improvements. These parties should then participate at an appropriate level to mitigate the identified traffic' problems. The County feels it is in the boot long term interest of Lincoln Center and other property owners in this area to participate in an effort such as this. Washington County stands ready to 'participate in such a process and devote its resources necessary and � es �� neces�s capable. 6 9D-0022/VAR VII Page "7 �1CITICE OF �lECISION� ►sDR 5Ci -dp�� LINCOLN 1r ' Washington County recommends that the following be conditions attached to approval of the current proposal • Prior to final approval/issuance of a building permit: Construct the new Mapleleaf Drive entrance to include three exit lanes (two left turn lanes and one through/right lane) and a straight stacking area Provide all signal design, timing and lane striping revisions at Greenburg Road and Mapleleaf Drive necessary to accommodate this improvement Provide 200 _ feet of two lane storage on the Locust Street westbound approach to Greenburg Road. These improvements (within the SW Greenburg Road right-of-way) shall be constructed in accordance with the requirement; of the Washington County Uniform Road Improvement Design Standards. b. Prior to occupancy; The road improvements required by condition A.1 and 2. Ethan be complete and accepted by the County. The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the proposal and offers the following recommended conditions of approval relative to construction activities on the site: a.' No storage of materials shall be allowed on public streets Junk piles and construction debris shall be screened from view of public streets. No construction shall be allowed to take. place between • through 7:00 AM or. Mondays through the hours of � . OCS PM �,hro Fridays. On Saturdays, no work shall be allowed from 9 :00 PM through 8:00 AM, : On Sundays, no work shall be allowed from 9:00 PM through 9:00 Alm • All construction Materials shall be stored on site. • A protective fence and canopy shall be required to be installed prior to the start of construction as specified in UBC Chapter 44. The protective fence shall be located along SW Greenburg Road, SW Mapleleaf Street, SW Locust Street, and In areas around the proposed building and parking structure where the public will have access. • Prior; to issuance of the Building Permit, the owner will be qi uired to show how. parking will be provided for construction workers and areas for construction equipment NOTICE OF DECISION -SDR 90-0022/VAR / 90 -0038 LINCOLN VIII Page 8 • s5:± , and materials delivery. Public streets will not be allowed to be, used for this purpose, Construction vehicles shall not be allowed to block City streets while waiting to make deliveries (i.e. concrete trucks, etc.). Construction vehicles should only be allowed to access the site from SW Locust Street off of SW Greenburg Road. The Oregon State Highway Division has reviewed the proposal and has noted concerns that the proposed development' would add to traffic problems in the area. The Highway Division does not find that the applicant's traffic study fully addresses the cumulative effects of this development as well as the potential impacts of other developable or redevelopable parcels in the area. The Highway Division has noted that the traffic study is flawed in assuming that the number of lanes on Highway 217 will be constructed soon. While g y Division has identified a need for additional lanes on the Ha_ hwa l3a.virai Highway 217, this is not an approved, funded project' at this time. The Highway Division 'states that the study also does not recommend sufficient roadway system to offset the proposed uff�.cient ��.m ravements to the rc� development's effects on other existing roads. (Note: These comments were received by telephone in response to the applicant's initial traffic analysis. No further comments were received from ODOT in response to the Supplemental traffic analysis report despite numerous calls to the initial ODOT commenter from City staff). Neighborhood Planning Organization 48 has reviewed the proposal and has noted that the NPO members have mixed opinions regarding the project. Several members have no objections to the project as proposed, while others object strongly. Several members expressed concerns about parking and traffic issues Washington County Community Planning Organization CPO 4M has submitted the following comments: a. CPO 4M contends that the application is incomplete. The traffic analysis 'is inaccurate in that it claims traffic that would be generated by the additional office building would not affect the surrounding area:. The area to the northeast and southeast IS residential and would be heavily impacted. In addition, the CPO believes the additional traffic impacts at Greenburg, Hall, and Pacific Hi g hwa y would add to the existing.' gridlock. b. Tigard City voters last May overwhelmingly rejected the President's Parkway Plan by a:'70 percent vote;. Part of that opposition was related to the projected 'influx of more '`gaff is in the M��zger area. Therefore, CPO 4M is 0 osed t g .quested variance for a pp to thQ yirant3.n of -the re h g pp i ei �t .��.crease and we are o oiled to an additional NOTICE OP 1 E'TSIC'g -SDR 90 -0022 /VAR 90 00 3 , INC0LN VIII Page 9 building and garage being approved unti the traffic system is corrected. ,^y. If the application is to be approved, the CPO suggests the following recommendations to better facilitate not only the liveability of the surrounding residential area, but to also facilitate those who are using the existing buildings in the center. (i) The three giant sequoia trees within the site should not be removed or harmed in order to construct the proposed building or other improvements. The CPO recommends that an arborist be employed to work in concert with the contractor there i at any time when the is ' disruption to the ground in the vicinity of any of three giant sequoias. (ii) The :present quality of natural light onto the site to the south and west would be greatly diminished by a multi -story building ''of 5 or more stories shading the existing less high structures. We recommend that the `office ,'building and parking structure be reversed in location. This could allow for some additional excellent landscaping and aesthetically orierl•c,,1 art work and walking area incorporated into tnu i arking structure. (iii) ,I If the parking lot is to re ';a i.n adjacent to Locust be�feet, the CPO recommends that the design element similar' to the existing garage on Locust and not be built like the garage on the Oak ,Street sido of the site. The Oak Street garage is most unattractive and quite an eyesore to those who live adjacent to the complex. Additionally, there should be a wider pedestrian ;,meridian between Locust and the garage to distance the Structure from the activity of the Street and sidewalk. We :request that the garage be limited to one or two levels to meet the needs of a 45 foot high building facility business population. (iv) The CPO recommends that the City of Tigard p rem rehensive Plan buildi ng height limitation of 45 feet be applied to this development. Doubling this building size to accommodate the applicant's reference of hardship is not taking into consideration the hardship the office will place upon' the City and the residential area's traffic problems. The City has also received several letters from residential property owners in the area Suggestions in those letters include: 1) that NOTICE OF DECISION -SDR 9070022 /VAR 90- 0035 LINCOLN VIII Page 10 • a traffic signal be installed at the intersection of Hall Boulevard and SW Oak Street; and 2) that SW Locust Street become a dead end street when entered from Hall Boulevard terminating at SW 90th Street. All of the letters received were opposed to approval of the development and the letters generally raised the same concerns as the comments of Community Planning Organization 4M. The Metzger Water District, PGE, and GTE, and the Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District have reviewed the proposal and have issued no comments or objections. No other comments have been received. ANALYSIS Site Development Review section 18,120.1.80 of the Tigard Community Development Code contains standards whereby the Planning Director or designee may approve, approve with modifications, or deny a Site Development Review request. The proposal for construction of the seven -story office building, three - level parking structure, and modifications to the existing Lincoln Savings, Building conforms with Community Development Code C-P (Commercial Professional) zoning district standards for setbacks, lot coverage, (maximum site coverage of 85 percent allowed; maximum coverage of the three involved parcels of 82 percent), and minimum site landscaping (minimum 15 percent site landscaping required, minimum site landscaping provided on the three parcels would be 18 percent) A variety of uses which typically occupy office buildings are permitted uses in the C-P zone. Parking structures or surface parking lots associated with a permitted or approved conditional use are also permitted. A variance to the C -P zone's maximum height building limit of 45 feet is requested to allow the proposed office building to be 92 feet tall. The proposed square footage of the building could be built on the site within the confines of the dimensional standards of zone, building need to be shorter and cover the C-P greater , portion of such a The would ht variance request is 9 addressed separately belowd standards for landsca in unity Development Code Parking The Proposal conforms with other applicable p` g (street trees, area trees), access, internal circulation, and parking lot and site l.ightin.g. Modifications to the site plait are necessary to remove or redesign an entrance to the parking ramp from SW Locust Street in order to improve traffic flown near the intersection and because the entrance as presently shown on the plan is not consistent with Code Vission, clearance requirements. Modifications to the site ,plan are also necessary to improve pedestrian circulation and to provide incentives for car pool and bicycle commuters. These modifications are necessary in order to discourage ssingle- passenger' ve h.icular traffic generated by the proposed development and reduce its ixttpact up= nearbY streets NOTICE OF AECxSI0N -.8DR Ica -022 vAR 0 -0033 LINCOLN VIII Page • '1: • Although appropriate numbers of total parking spaces (564 total spaces required; 614 spaces provided) and designated handicapped parking spaces (7 required; 8 provided) are proposed, modifications to the site plan to provide details on bicycle rack parking and handic .peed ;parking space locations must be made to bring the proposal into conformance with Code parking requirements. Further discussion related to the proposal's' conformance with Code and comprehensive Plan standards is included below. A variance has been requested to allow the width of the proposed compact parking spaces to be 8 feet rather than the 8.5 feet required by the Code' for compact parking spaces. In addition, the site plae. provides for 35 percent of the total parking spaces to be compact spdees whereas the Community Development Code allows a maximum of 25 percent of required.' spaces to be compact spaces. Previous development approvals for various portions of the Lincoln, Center development allowed a maximum of 40 percent of the required spaces to be compact spaces. It is unclear how those previous development approvals would affect the current situation because it involves redevelopment of the Lincoln Savings Building and the surface parking area. In order to allow the compact to standard space ratio that the site plan calls for, a variance is cons,t "' -red to allow 35, percent of the parking spaces to be compact spaces rathe than the 25 percent maximum specified by the Code. Those variances arr 3o discussed further below. Variance - Building Height &imit The proposed office building would; be 92 feet ta1.1 to the top of the parapet. The maximum building height standard in the C--P zone is 45 feet. Exceptions to this standard are permitted without requiring a variance if certain criteria are satisfied. Section 18,98J020 of the Community Development Code (Building Height Exceptions) allows a building height of 75 feet if the following coeditions will, exist: .) the building's floor area does not exceed 1.5 tines the area of the site 2) the proposed structure does not abut a resiacrtial zoning district; and 3) all building' setbacks from property lines equal at leant one-half the building's height- Additional building height beyond 75 feet has also been allowed by the City in some cases through approval of variances. The proposal Satisfies, two of these building height exception standards. The propoded buildin g' s floor are a would be 140,000 square feet f eet and the reduced floor area of the Lincoln Savings building will be approximately 57,350 square feet. The total Site area is 197,350 square feet, The total building gross floor area on the site therefore 'would not be more than 1.5 times the site area. Therefore, the proposal complies with the maximum ° floor area ratio Standard. In addition, the site does not abut properties zoned to use. Properties to the west are zoned C.- - G and p p the north, east, and west are all zoned cep. This building height exception criterion is also satisfied. The proposed building, , + tern property line and therefore all however, would abut the. site "9 wed_ building setbacks from property lines would` not be at least one half the �g P y building's height. . Since the proposal does not comply 1• with the standards for a building height exception as described above, a variance to the budding height hi standard has t1 a y � g 9 therefore been requested. NOTICE OF DECISION -SDR 90-0022/VAR 90-003 3 LINCOLN VIII Page► 12 1' • Section 18.134.050 of the Code contains the following criteria for approval of a variance to a Code requirement: �. The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this Code; be in conflict with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan; to any other applicable policies and Standards; and to other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity. . ' There are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the lot size or shape, topography, or other circumstances for which the applicant has not control and which are not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district. . The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this Code and City standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possib'ht, while permitting some economic use of the land. 4. Existimg physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, drama tic la nd forms or parks will not be adversel y affected any more than would occur if the development were located as specified in the Code. 5. The hardship is not self- imposed and the variance requested is the minimum variance which would eliminate the hardship. The Primary intent of the Code's building height and Setback requirements are to Provide adequate light and space between buildings, particularly when in districts involved.' In the present situation, different zoning ricts are involve buildings on parcels abutting tax lot 1000 are setback a minimum of 75 feet from the proposed building, with existing buildings and potential building sites on parcels that are not part of the Lincoln Center complex g feet m the p ro p os ed' building. This separation should provide adequate space and light between buildings in this area and thus these purposes of the Code and the Comprehensive Plan would not be controverted if the requested variance is approved. The special circumstance which affects the re test is the impertinence of the maximum height standard' with respect to the purpose of this standard. As noted above, the apparent intent of the building height limitation to provide a separation between tall buildings from neighboring low height buildings is not pertinent because of the Alietande between the proposed building and neighboring buildings, especially residences to' the north and east, and the existence of other tall buildings in ,the same development" The closest' residence to the proposed building would he approximately 400 feetto the .northeast. The Lincoln Tower and Lincoln Seven buildings which feet h . pop 9 p of the as tall, or taller than the 'crate the site o ro osed buildin from the t Of ,the a nearby se proposed as a vLsual building cannot bel�.c�ma or, jy sidenta.al. area sa that the �.ntriison upon that neighborhood. NOTICE OF DEC,ISIU N"-SDR 90.- 0022 /VAFt 90 -0033 LINCOLN VIII Page 13 'at The proposed general office usage of the building is permitted in the C -P zone and would not be affected by the requested building height variance. No, effects upon natural or physical systems are foreseen if the height variance is approved. No additional impact upon the storm drainage system is foreseen since the variance would add only additional building height and not increase in the site's impervious surfaces. Although additional tevelopment° in this area will add traffic to already busy streets, the requested variance would not result in an increase in traffic beyond what otherwise would result from development of a conforming 45 foot tall office building that would have a larger building footprint. Such a building could be built on this site without variances and with the same potential traffic impacts but with possible negative effects to the neighborhood and streetscape because such a building would necessarily leave much less area landscaping than the current proposal does. Because such a shorter, more massive building could be built on the site without the need for a variance, there would not appear to be a potential hardship to the site's developers if the requested variance was not granted. Instead, the hardship would be upon the neighbors, passers -by, and the city as a whole, if strict conformance with the height standard resulted in a development with less landscaping ann d o p en area and therefor e a less-pleasing g streetscape and micro - environment. Variance - Compact Parking Space Width Partin�� ace Ratio The requested reduction in compact parking space width from 8.5 feet to 8 feet as well as the adjustment to the compact /standard „parrking space ratio are reasonable respect with res ect to this type of use where most vehicles that are parked on the site are there throughout the day' as opposed to a retail or civic use situation where there would typically be many users of the same parking space throughout the day. The Community Development Code parking requirements are intended to apply to all parking lot situations although staff has frequently found that the characteristics of the use of a particular parking lot situation are often such that strict compliance � with with the Code. requirements may result in over-design of the lot wi respect to the needs of the uses served by the lot. In a retail or use situation, parkin g spaces need to be larger to accommodate the varying of the space who may be dealing with babies, objects which require or other bj � ° quire that doors be wide open and (or) additional maneuvering room. These situations are a lot less likely in an office parking lot situation due to the different type of parking space user. If a visitor or employee requires the additional area for uvering they can move to another area of the arking structure to find a�sppace next to an aisle, walkway, or other open parking space. Likewise, the driver will seek out a longer parking 'space elsewhere to accommodate a compact p protect their own car that will not fit into a com act s ace in order to r car. If the inconvenience becomes too great, it is assumed that the driver will either take their business elsewhere 'or make arrangements with the develo ment' s mans er for the necessar parking space. de venience therefore �' p g p therefore be a limiting factor in the aces The inconvenience T attractive p g May g eness� Of the v op to tenants so that they take their tenancy elsewhere. Therefore, the NOTICE. OF DECISION -SDR 90- 0022 /VAR 90 -0033 LINCOLN VIII Page 14 IA Mi • • pr • applicants' request is most likely to cause an inconvenience to their own interests rather to any public interest. The public interest with regard to parking space width is to make sure that the reduced width does not become too inconvenient to potential users that they choose to instead park on' public - streets or other private streets in order to have usable parking spaces. This would be highly unlikely in the present situation because the coverage and proximity to the office buildings offered by the parking structure would tend to more than compensate for any inconvenience caused by smaller spaces than may be available on the street or in other private parking lots. Additionally, thh e applicants point out that the narr ower p arkin g space size requested was permitted outright by Washington County for the earlier developments in the Lincoln Center ,'development and was also permitted as a variance ,to City standards through other development approvals.' The requested variance would allow continuation of the established design pattern for the development. The applicants have not encountered difficulties or complaints with regard to parking space widths with the existing parking lots. The narrower spaces allow a net decrease in site coverage and a commensurate increaoe in landscaped area which provides a Public visual benefit and decreased surface runoff. Staff finds that for these reasons the requested variance will be beneficial to' the development scheme for the Lincoln Center without beneficial e L�nc creating adverse impacts to public interests, physical natural public Y ubl�.c intergest � r to h., sisal or Hato as ublic, roadways or drains ewa s or to the interests of systems su�ki a ` adjacent property owners. The amount y of variance �' with i ariance , from the standard is reasonable with respect to what has previously been permitted for the entire development as well as with respect to what other jurisdictions have found to be adequate. The ''eduction in size may also have a public benefit in that it would decrease the amount of site coverage that would be necessary if the same number of parking spaces were constructed in strict compliance with Code requirements. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The applicable criteria` in this case are Tigard Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106 , 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, 18' 184; and 18.164 (Source: Site Development Review Approval Standards Code Section 18.120.180); and Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 4.2.1,''' 6.1 .1, 7.1.2, 7.4.4 7.5.1, 7.8.2, 7.6.1, 8.1.1, 8.1.2, 8.1.3, 8.2.2, 9.1.1 and 9.1.3. The Plannin g Division presents the following findings relative to the proposal's consistency with the applicable standards of the Community Development Code and Comprehensive 'Plan: 1. Chapter 18.64 (C--P Zone) is satisfied because the proposal conforms with use and applicable dimensional requirements of the C-P Zone With the exception of the 45 foot maximum building height standard. NOTICE OF DECISION -S 11190 - -0022/ -� INCOLN VIII Page 15 -0022/VAR �0 -0033 � L TY N 11111111111111111111•11•11111111111111111111311111111111111111 Further discussion related to the standar /; is contained in point the discussion related to Section 18.134 (Variance) , below. Chapter 18.98 (Building Height Limitation: Exceptions) is not appl;tcable because the proposed building does not comply with all of the applicab::Le standards for a building height exception. In addition, the proposed 92 foot tall building exceeds the maximum height that is allowed if the criteria for building height exception are satisfied. Building height is therefore, discussed under the Chapter 18.134 (Variance) below. Chapter 18.100 (Landscaping) is satisfied because the proposed landscaping plan provides adequate numbers, locations, and sizes of required street trees and at least 15 percent of the site will be landscaped as required for the C-P zoning district. ! For the' most part, existing street trees and other trees on the site except within the parking area are to remain. This includes retention of the three large sequoia trees just south of the Lincoln Savings building. In addition, the interior of the site will be appropriately landscaped with a combination with deciduous trees, lawn, and ornamental landscaping to create an attractive Landscape. No special buffering or screening of this site from adjacent parcels across SW Locust the same C -P zoning district Locust that are within t as the subject site is required by the Code buffering standards. ' ra.n standard�a Likewise, no buffering or screening of the proposed development fLom C-G Zoned parcels across Greenburg Road is required. Nevertheless, staff ' d by CPO 4M that the parking garage be shares the concern raise attractively screened from views street by additional p•, g` ' ews from the landscaping, scr o ca'ing, berms or an additional setback from sidewalks. Additionally, the appearance of the parking garage could possibly be improved through decorative treatment of the wall openings or other modifications to the building design. Like the CPO, Planning staff also finds the design of the existing garage along Locust far preferable to the design of the Oak Street garage. At a minimum, the landscaping plan will need to be revised to provide medium height (6- :10 foot) ever -green plantings along the parking garage's north side to provide partial screening of the interior parking area from view from Locust Street in order to he consistent with Community Development Code Section 18.100.110.A.1. Chap ter 18.102 ( Vasual Clearance Areas ) sot fv11 y satisfied ed because nade q uate viin wot�d be p rovided at the intersection of y p g p Locust Street. The vision the drivewa �'r ®s:n the arka.n ram to aW L clearanc standard requires a triangular clear vision area be learance Provided at all intersections so ,that vehicles entering a public street can be:'seen and drivers' of the vehicles can adequately see the road and sidewalk (Code Section 1.102.02'0) . The proposed parking garage would be setback only five feet from the ; sidewalk: along SW Locust Street an' d i therefore autos leaving the ramp would often be partially across the sidewalk before the~.v'er would have clear vision in, both directions. In addition, this proposed driveway would 001'102 '0F bECxsxON -S nA 50 90 0033 LINCotN v page l8' ro N,.., �..— w..... w.., rn✓I �.,L� tea.. . ,.- ....�'. . is be only 150 feet east of the Locust /Greenburg intersection and thus traffic exiting the ramp may conflict with traffic turning right onto Locust from Greenburg and with ].eft turn traffic stacked in the required 200 foot left turn reservoir on westbound Locust Street. This driveway will therefore need to be eliminated or moved eastward with redesign to the ramp structure in order to bring the driveway into conformance with th e Co de requirements Another option n would be setting the garage further back' from the sidewalk in order to improve both p clear vision and the streetscape along Locust Street. Adequate ate vision clearance is provided for at all other public road intersections and intersections of private roadways with public streets. Although not a violation of Community Development Code requirements because the intersection is internal to 'the site and involves only private roadways, staff is concerned that the ramps to the parking ramp that are parallel to the private access road from SW Locust Street will pose site distance and clear vision difficulties Staff urges the applicant to i th pp o fully consider vehicular and pedestrian safety ' at this internal intersection. Chapter 18,106` (off -street parking). The proposed parking structure provides an adequate number' of off- street parking spaces for the potential uses of the new office building, as well as the modified Lincoln Savings building. In addition, the entire Lincoln Center is well provided with parking and reciprocal parking easements amongst the parcels guarantees that infrequent demands for parking beyond what is provided for a particular building can be accommodated within other parking lots. The parking plan provides for an adequate number of' handicapped parking spaces (eight) to satisfy Community, Development Code and Ore g on evzsed Statutes ford designated handicapped, d sp aces . The site p lan will need iced 'prior to building permit issuance, however, to indicate where the proposed handicap parking spaces are to b e located on the'site. It is recommended that the 'handicapped parking spaces be located close to the main entrance to the building and under cover; The site plan indicates an area for bicycle parking in the new parking 'structure, but does not indicate the number of bicycle parking spaces to be provided or the type of bicycle rack.' Community Development Code Section x:8.106.02 0.P requires that one bicycle parking space in a rack be provided for every fifteen automobile p g p e, , a mi.nimum of 21 bicycle Parking spaces arkin s aces. Therefor mu p building P " : , it will be st be rovidecl.� prLOr to bu�.idin erm�.t is�luance it necessary for the applicant to provide information on the type of rack, number of bicycles that 'can be accommodated, and the exact locations' of the bicycle racks. It is highly recommended that bicycle parking be provided in as convenient a location to the entrances of the'`buildingsas possible while not requiring excessive climbing NOTICE OF DECISION -SDR .90- 0022/vAR 0 --0033 LINCOLN VIII Page 17 movements within the parking garage. It is also recommended that the bicycle racks be placed under cover so as to protect the bicycles from the weather and to provide an advantageous parking location for ,- - - bic. y clists relative to automobile users visitin g the site. The transportation analysis submitted along with the site plan recommends on page 5 that a car- vanpool service be implemented for the site. City staff strongly supports this recommendation; however, staff stops short of requiring such a program as a condition of development approval because of the difficulty of enforcing such a condition. n ` , the transportation analysis recommends that I add�.t�on t convenient parking areas for carpool and vanpool participants should be implemented. This recommendation of the applicant's transportation analysis has not been implemented by the site plan. Because of the traffic congestion that exists in this area, it is imperative that simple traffic reduction measures, such as this, be implemented. Therefore, the site plan will reed to be modified prior to building permit issuance to indicate at least 20 carpool parking spaces to be provided within close proximity to the main entrance to the building. Further, it is required that these spaces be full size standard parking'sapaces so as to provide a level of convenience for p be provided to other users the users of the car Pools that will not b of the parking structure because of the reduced parking size widths proposed The proposed variances to the widths of compact parking spaces as well as the variance to the � compact standard parking space e maa;;.�mum to ratio are approved based' upon the findings in the analysis section above. The City of Tigard finds that the requested variances will have no bearing upon public interests and will allow ' efficient use of the site with respect to qualities of the parking demand for office buildings that would not exist for the full range of parking demands -he Code requirements d to serve. de are intended P (Access) p y satisfied because the proposed s6. pha teg 18.108 Access is art�.all g roadways will provide ark�.n structure and existin. internal, adequate vehicular access, to the site in conformance with Code standards, however, the site plan provides much less than adequate pedestrian access on the site. Adequate pedestrian access is r y ; p ranaporta1ion to riiecPssRt,r �n order to romote ' alternative means of t automobiles So as to reduce traffic to dA.ng` in > the area. Code Section 18.108.050 requires that walkways extend from the ground floor entranced at all com`nercial uses to the streets 'which provide required access and egress. The plan' prov ` ',Pedestrian access from SW Greenburg to the io osed new office building o Site. �des� no edr�stri p • p g r the' existing Lincoln turns° its back on Greenbut Road and IS oriented rimaril s;Yew vffic builda,n new g g tact; p y Inwards the n..w p In ac he ro ot�ed parking structure, Prior to building; permit issuance, it will be ` necessary that the site plan be revised to provide efficient safe pedestrian walkways from 8W Greenburg Road to both the new and the existing NOTZ CSC OF DECISION SDR. 50.4022/VAR 90 -003 LINCOLN VIII ' Page 18 olf rJ office ;buildings. on the site. It is highly recommended that a principal entrance to the new building be provided facing Greenburg Road Chapter 18.120 (Site Development Review) is largely satisfied because the proposal is c qu' of the various Code consistent with the requirements chapters and Plan policies as noted within the surrounding paragraphs and as required by the Site Development Review approval standards contained in Code Section 18.120.180.A. In addition, the proposal takes reasonable care to preserve existing trees, would not be located within an area of known physical hazards, and would be provided with necessary public facilities. Chapter 18.134 (Variance) is satisfied because the requested variances to allow additional building height, to allow a reduction in the width of compact parking spaces, and to increase the ratio' of compact to standard parking spaces satisfy the approval criteria for variances to Code standards as described in th discussion section above. Chapter 18.150 (Tree Removal) is satisfied because the applicant will be required to obtain a tree removal permit prior to removing trees in preparation for development. Permits will be granted only, if it is found necessary to remove the trees to accommodate structures, Y driveways, utilities or other proposed improvements. plan development that will be The site .la;�i illustrates trees within the cis ael retained. An arborist's report outlining methods of protection of trees to be retained must be submitted prior to the issuance of a site grading permit or tree removal permit. This is especially important with regard to restricting activities that may affect the sequoia tree in the island within the main access driveway ,47,hrough the Liaicsaln Center development. The site plan indicates that a portion of the island will be removed and that a new sewer line to serve the proposed building will Pass within 30 - feet of the tree. If the arborist has any reservations regarding potential harmful effects of the construction activities upon this tree, or, other Significant existing trees, site plan or proposed construction ' x�n trees the techniques will need to be revised to assure protection of the trees. 10. Chapter 18.164 (Street and Utility Standards) w'ill' be satisfied upon submittal and approval of detailed public improvement plans for any roadwork y _ P g -way of SW Wor]� or utilit consi.ructa.ora within the ri, kite =-of Locust Street or SW Greenburg Road. Preliminary plans for improvements as indicated by the traffic study and aS recommended, to be modified by ' the Washington County and Tigard Engineering Department comments are consistent with these standards Dedication of right-of-Way to 49 feet from the centerline of SW be accomplished prior to building permit issuance' This was also a c ndition of approval of the prior minor Greenburg will ne arta.{. P P . P .�.s ion for this parcel: land ion dec NOVICE Or DECISION -SbR 90- 0022/VAi 90 -0033 I,INCotN vii Page 19 a. Improvement plans for construction within the SW Greenburg Road right -of -way must be consistent with the Washington County Uniform Road Improvement Design Standards and must be reviewed and approved. by County staff The City is responsible for the approval and inspection of improvements within the SW Locust Street right -of -way. Plan Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied because NPa #8 and CPO #4M as well as affected public service providing agencies have been notified of this proposal and have been given an opportunity to comment. 12. Plan Policy 4.2.1 will be satisfied through the building permit review process which requires that an erosion control plan satisfying non -point source pollution control requirements for the Tualatin River basin be submitted and approved prior to building permit issuance. 14 addition, because the proposed parking structure will contain greater than 250 parking spaces, the applicant will need to provide proof that an indirect source construction permit has been, obtained from the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. 13. Plan Policy 5.1.1 is satisfied because the proposed development project would be supportive of growth. of the local job market. ' y because adequate Public water, 14. Plan Pol�.c 7.1.2 is satisfied b@ sanitary sewer, and storm sewer facilities are available to serve the proposed project and either are in or will be required to be constructed by the applicant to City of Tigard and Metzger Water District standards. The applicant will be required to show through analysis of the storm drainage network that any additional runoff impact downstream properties. from this site will not significantly im 15. Policy 7.4.4 is satisfied' because the proposed office structure will be connected to the public sanitary sewer system. 16- Policy 7.5.1, 7.5.2, and 7.6.1 have been satisfied because the Tigard Department', and Valley Fire and Rescue District Peace ave been involved nn the �review aof this application snd have offered ants that have been incorp in this report. comma orated..... 17. Policy 8.1.1 calls for the provision of a safe and efficient street system that meets current needs and the anticipated future growth and development. This policy is satisfied because the public: and private roadw a y i, p that will bra required to be constructed as m r ®vements conditions of approval of this development proposal should allow adjacent and siearby roadways to maintain current levels of service, . of service on Greenburg although Y Road o i.s the is acceptable rserv.ice fore this area'.' The Cit. y shares the County" s view that additional study of areawi.de traf fie demands is needed and thai- the Lincoln VIII developers should participate in the costs of designing and implementing needed traffic p y traffic' be a joint effort of the a.m rovements. An" traffic studies should adjoining property owners the City, the County and the State Highway Division. Since:the scope of the needed study and the extent of NOTICE OF DECISx0N -S011 90-0022/VAR 9O. 003. LINCOLN VIII Page 2 ra needed capital improvements is not yet determined, it is difficult to determine the appropriate share for any given property at this time. However, the Lincoln VIII development will be required to pay a substantial traffic impact fee (TIF). The TIF can be utilized by the City and County to fund costs associated with solving the traffic needs of Greenburg Road and Locust :Street, Therefore, it appears that through the TIF the Lincoln VIII development will provide for a share of the needed traffic improvements,. The City applauds the recognition by the " applicant's traffic analysis that potential traffic impact mitigation measures need not be limited to structural means. Improved public transit, improved opportunities, for pedestrians and bicyclists, and ride - sharing programs can reduce total, traffic in this area. The conditions of approval of this decision require modifications to the site plan related to some of these alternative measures in order to attempt to reduce the proposed development's potential traffic impacts. Other programs such as flex -time work schedules could be implemented by the tenants of the Lincoln Center to shift traffic away from peak times. The City urges the developers and tenants of Lincoln Center and other nearby traffic generators to aggressively pursue these simple traffic alternative measures in an attempt to reduce traffic in this area. Such an effort need not wait until ` l completion of the area -wide traffic study. 18. Policy 8.1.2 is satisfied because the Oregon State Highway Division and the Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation have been involved in the review of transportation issues related to this application. 1 The conditions of approval for this project Will insure that Plan Policy 8.1.3 is satisfied because: The development abuts two public streets, SW Greenburg Road and SW Locust Street, and the site plan provides adequate and safe access to these streets, contingent upon the modifications, required by the conditions attached to approval of the application. b. Acl,ditional ,public right -!of -way is required to be dedicated as a condition of approval of this proposed development to extend the right -of -way ref Greenburg Road to 49 feet from its centerline along the subject parcel's frontage. The additional right- of-way is necessary to , provide for possible future widening of this road. No additional public right -of -way is needed orlon ng SW Locust Street: - - c. Adequate Street:, curb, and 'sidewalk improvements exist on the streets abutting this site to meet errant minimum 'needs, le .r `ficant improvements tco SW } � that aign,�. Greenburg Road and Highway 217 will likely be necessary in the. near future. The develo er will be responsi 'gal P ble .for signal modifications and pavement striping modifications at the NOTICE OF DECISION -SLED. 90- 0022/VAR 90 0038 LINCOLN VIII Page 21 7• � Mapieleaf Drive /SW Creenburg Road intersection and the additional left turn storage on SW Locust Street as requested. by Washington County in order to mitigate the impacts of the projected increase in vehicular traffic resulting from this development. The Traffic Impact Fees generated by the proposed development will aid in financing a study of traffic needs and in constructing further improvements. No additional bus turnouts or shelters have been recommended by the agencies reviewing the devolopment" s - potential traffic impacts. Nevertheless, the City t,rges the owners and tenants of the Lincoln Center development to work with Tri. -Met to improve transit usage related to the development. Possible improvements could nclu.de having buses enter the development's roadways in order to improve accessibility to the transit system,' a bus , shelter, employer subsidized bus passes, sales of bus passes, and improved information on bus service available on the site. Parking spaces for disabled persona will need to be provided as required by City and State standards. Prior to building permit issuance, a final plan for the proposed parking structure shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval that shows locations and, dimensions of all designated handicapped parking spaces. Handicapped spaces `'should ` be located convenient to entrances to the building. by p bicycle/pedestrian property affected b the adopted bit, f . The is not Plan for the City 2a o Policy 8.2.2 is sa tisfied because the p ro p Deed develo p meat would be of City policies to encourage the ex anso n and use of p transit by locating intensive uses in close proximity to existing transit ways, and because as previously mentioned in this re p ort r the Cit y will require that the developer provide preferential: parking for carpool and 'vanpooi users within the proposed parking structure 21 Poiicies' 9.1.1, and 9;.1.3 require the City to enc. ".ourage a reduction energy p by increased, o ortunities for energy in ever cansum Lion b increas PP conservation and through encouragement of developments which ernphas,?ze such opportunities through design features. These policies are eE,c:iafied through the required modifications' to the site plan intended to promote mass transit usage, pedestrian walkway usage, and carpool usage; which will encourage energy conservation through sound development design and construction. D. DECISION The Community Development, Director's designee hereby APPROVES Site DeV elop ment Rcvze w a pp lacation S DR 9 0W 6022 and Variance application Inuit 90- �117Tx CAE OF DECISION-DA. V i11 Page 22 oN -�r��. ��- aa�a,��R g��.aa�� L�N�oLN 0033 which will allow the proposed building to be rio taller than 92 feet, to allow up to 35 percent of all parking spaces to be compact spaces, and compact parking p to allow c.om act arkin spaces to be reduced in width to 8 feet:. Th e above described development approvals are subject to the following conditions THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A SITE WORK OR GRADING PERMIT. (Staff contact, Chris Davies, Engineering Department, 639 - 4171): 'Sanitary drainage details and calculations shall be sewer and storm provided as part of the site improvement plans. Calculations shall be b ased on full development of the serviceable area. The location and capacity of existing, proposed, and future lines shall be addressed. Designs submitted shall be stamped )ay .eased. Deair na :and calculations a Registered Professional Engineer licensed. to practice in the State of Oregon. An erosion control .Lan shall p' be provided as part of the improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Control plans -» Technical Guidance Handbook, November 1989." Prior to any tree removal oval or grading, a detailed tree protection plan shall be prepared by aalified arborist. The tree protection plan shall be submitted for Planning Division approval. The plan must include locations and types of trees to be removed or retained, recommendations for methods of protecting retained trees during construction' of the proposed buildings as well as for the long- -term health of theso trees, and a commitment for continuing review of the construction activities and tree protection measures by the arboriet, The tree; Plan shall'include at a minimum all trees designated for retention on the preliminary landscaping plan and should endeavor to add additional' mature trees as practicable. The trees to be saved shall be protected during construction by fencing or similar means approved by the arborist and Planning Division. No site grading, clearing or tree removal shall occur prior to "` ' STAFF CONTACT Jerry Offer, Planning satisfaction e�� thx.e, �,onda.t�.on. a Division, (639 -4171) THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL '8E SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT. (Unless noted otherwise, staff contact is Chris Davies, En a.�,ee g" ring' Department,` 639- 4111): plan shall submitted which provides for the 4. A revised sits= 1 �Ll }ae submi.tte following changes:' Ati Sidewalk connections shall be provided between the southwestern . the lding and the public 's idet� ask on Greenburg Road, aide of i.11e `bus between Greenburg Road and the northeasern tide of the building, and along the main accesL' road, from Greenburg Road to the , existing walkway south of the f4indoin Savings aui dingo NOTICE QF D;ECISIbN -SDR 90,- 0022 /V'AR 90 -ob33 LINCOLN VIII Page 2; n 02.4'041: , Removal or relocation ation and redesign or the driveway from the parking ramp directly Street. driveway is ark,in ram dircectl to SW Locust Street . Tf the dray to be `relocated, it must be redesigned to provide adequate vision clearance and it must be sufficiently removed from the Locust/Greenburg intersection so as to avoid traffic conflicts with vehicles on Locust Street. STAFF CONTACT,. Jerry Offer, Planning Division, (639-4171). A detailed plan of the parking structure shall be Submitted which provides for the following: A`. Locations and dimensions of no less than 8 designated handicapped accessible parking spaces; Locations Of no less than 20 full size parking spaces (9 foot by 18 foot) reserved and signed for car pool use only • A warning bell, warning light, or other warning device must be provided where an exit from the proposed parking, structure will cross any sidewalk. • Location and rack details for no less than 21 bicycle parking spaces. • Locations and dimensions of all parking spaces and aisleways. No ' more than 250 compact parking spaces with dimensions of 8 feet by 15 feet ma y be provided. All compact s p aces shall be for marked f • p t use only. Spaces other than required car -; compact ac pool spaces, designated handicapped spaces, and compact spaces shall be no smaller than 9 feet by 18.5 feet in size. STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Offer, Planning Division, (639 -4171) ' A detailed landscaping plan 'shall be submitted including types and .sizes of existinc and proposed Hlandscaping material and g tinting locations including distances from buildings, sidewalks, and :roatAt.y04 Medium height ,(6- .0 foot tall) ; ever; -green plax thgs shall be provided between the `sidewalks and parking garage in order to break _,up the appearance of the structure's large wall, openings. • p� g p p p street trees. 1STAFF CONTACT: Jerry�Offer, Planning Division, (639 - -4171). Additional ublic' right of� -wy be dedicated to increase the p '" a 'shall ` g j y g Road to 49 feet fronm its centerlin.o: along b A ,t to su ajsot pares l es bfrontage. A one foot wide non - access strip shah. be, created 'along the proper y `s 'OreeinbLurg Road frontage. Proof o f the dedication and establishment of the non access'strip shall be provided to ''the City df Tigard Engineer .ng Department. CONTACT: Washington County Surveyor's Office. • NOTIOE OF DECISION -S DR 90 -0022 %"BA11 90-0033 LINCOLN VIII Page 24 it ▪ The _',applicants shall demonstrate that they have legal authorization to construct the required revisions to the private Mapleieaf Street approachito Greenburg Road. ▪ The applicants shall comply with Washington County requirements; submit gineerin , lans obtain Engineering Di pp p g g vision approval, and obtain a facility permit for construction of the following public improvements: A) 13) construct the new Mapeleaf Drive entrance to include three exit lanes (Two left turn lanes and one ; through/ right turn lane) and a straight stacking area. Provide, all signal design, timing, and lane striping revisions at Greenburg Road and Mapleleaf Drive necessary, to accommodate this improvement. Provide 200 feet of two lane storage on the LOcust Street westbound approach to aeeienburg RQ.d. These improvements ( within S.W. Greenburg Road ri g. ht- of -wa y) ehall be constructed in accordance with the requirements of the Washington County Uniform Road Improvement Design Standards. CONTACT: Scott g Washington County p Transportation, King, Washa.n tart: Count Department of Land Use and Trans o (684- 4632). Dint use and d maintenance agreement shall be executed and recorded �.© ;� City for all mr�ton driveways. The agreement shall on Cit standard forms l ca be referenced on and become part of all applicable, parcel deeds. The agreement shall be approved by the ' Engineering Department prior to recording. 11. The applicant shall demonstrate that storm drainage runoff can be discharged into, the existing drainageways without significantly irnpacti q properties downstream 12. Prior to issuance of the Building Permit, the owner will be required to show how parking,' will be provided for construction workersH and are'as' for construction equipment and materials delivery. Public streets will not be allowed;to be used for this purpose. 13. The applicant shall submit to the City of Tigard Engineering Department twa sets of plans, of !sufficient scale, vahich .detail the existing' and proposed (final approved site plan) site conditions with � ar ticu a r attention on being' a e impervious Area. In aaditiOn alculations shall lso be s4bm+ t � which determ he tr e amount of ' impervious surface area before' aired. after development. 14. The appiica Shall submit, to City of Tigard Engineering �. i i Department ne seta of approved-building' pproved bui, ding Plana (floor plans only) for the existing structure which is to be removed and for the proposed seven story structure. Calculations shall also be provided as to the tOtall square "footage of each building. In addition, for the existing NOT ICE OF �EC1SZC N� SDR 9D- 0022�VAR 90-0033 LINCOLN VIII Fagg 25 ' M'r building, the applicant shall EIV)mit a statement wh ch detail its existing use 15. The ',applicant shall demonstrate that sufficient parking, for the existing businesses and visitors, is available during the construction of the proposed development. 16. The applicant shall provide idence that an Indirect Source Permit`, for the parking area has been obtained from the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. STAFF CONTACT: ` Jerry Offer, Planning Division (539 - 4171) . DURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED OFFICE BUILDING AND PARKING FACILITY, THE FOLLOWI NG CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED. (Staff contact, Coy Humphrey, Code Enforcement Officer, 639- 4171)s 17.' No storage of materials shall be allowed on public streets. Junk piles and construction debris shall be screened from view of public streets. 18. No construction shall be allowed to take place between the hours of 9:00 Pty through 7:00 AM on Mondays through Fridays. On Saturdays, no work shall be allowed from 9 :00 PM through 8 :00 AM. On Sundays, no work shall be allowed from 9:00 PM through 9:00 AM. 19. All construction mato iais shall be stored on site. 20. A protective fence and canopy shall be required to be installed prior to the start, of construction as specified in UBC Chapter 44. The p rolectave f ence shall be located along long SW Greenburg g Kvad, SW Mapleleaf S tr eet, SW Locust Street , and in ar eas around the proposed building and parking structure where the public will have access- 21. Construction vehicles shall not be allowed to block City streets while waiting to make deliveries (i.e. concrete trucks, etc.). Construction vehicles should only ` be allowed to access the site from SW Greenburg Road and SW Locust Street west of SW ; 93rd Avenue only. Construction, traffic shall not use Oak Street to access the site. Construction traffic shall not Use Locust Street east of 93rd Avenue to access the site' No vehicles u4ich are related to the belonging ate er�►f lotee improvements vernents (inclu j ing vehicles construction subject impro d p ye s, subcoptractor deliverers, etc*) shall be allowed to park on SW Oak Street, SW Locust Street, or SW Street; I 93rd Avenue. THE FOLLOWING, CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF AN OCCUPANCY PE SATISFACTORY N PERFORMANCE ASSURANCE SHALL BE AR ANTEEING THEIR COMPLETION WITHIN A SIX MONTH PERIOD.' (Unless POSTED GUARANTEEING noted otherwise, staff contact is Vi Goodwin, Permit Coordinator, 639- 41.11) . NOTICE OF DECISION --,SDR 90-- 0022 /VAR 90-0033 LINCOLN VIII: Page 2f • 4r. 22. All landscaping materials and other proposed site improvements shall be installed or financially assured prior to the occupancy of any structures. 23 sign permit shall be obtained prior to the erection of any sign. Sign location and size must: be in compliance with Chapter 18.114 of the Community Development Code. STAFF CONTACT: Ron, Pomeroy, Planning Division, (639- 4171). 24. The improvements to S.W. Greenburg, Road, S.W. Locust, and the Mapleleaf Drive entrance shall be approved and accepted by Washington County and the City of Tigard. THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE FINAL DECISION DATE NOTED BELOW. PROCEDURE 1 • Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to X,The applicant and owner _Owners of record within the required distalie The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization X Affected government agencies 2 • Final Dect,sion: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON February 4 1991 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. P P Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is g ,ven and dent. Appeal fee schedule and forms are available at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, Oregon The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 p.m. February 4, x.991. Questions: If you have questions, please call City of Tigard Planning Department, City of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. -, Tigard, Oregon. I r1 y Offer oc;i.ate Planner APPROVED BY: 1 ith Liden Senior Planner 4 • >r; DATE NOTICE OF DEC1810N -SDR 90 0022 /VAR 90 -0033 LINCOLN V1 /I Page 27 " A .f. _1. BLVD: CRESCENT GROVE 11 11 11 1 11 =CEMETERY: w = _. tk ek eo � ` �.N.y ,,. /\ \ S' SW PIM LEHMANN BORDERS ocoss T SHADY ` LN S.W. 0 MIN IOW 1 .q • 1S135AB —OO90O • • a 0.0 •. • • w ,u'a.• . o. 0 o • ■ • w '.. SEIYU INTERNATIONAL CORP. BY CROW PORTLAND MANAGEMENT PARTNERSHIP 10260 SW GREENBURG RD SUITE 750 TIGARD, OR 97223 1S13SAB -01003 ••........w.•.• CROW- SPIN- •HOSPORD #65 BY TRAMMELL CROW CO P 0 BOX 5396 PORTLAND OR 97228 1S135AB' O34O0 ..................... LINCOLN CENTER PHASE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 10300 SW GREENBURG RD #200 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S135BA -00102 •o e. •• w.o FRINGE LAND ORE LTD 9585 SW WASHINGTON SQ RD PO BOX 23635 TIGARD OR 97223 15126DC- -04500 odo•.oa'e.s.. DRINKARD, LILLIAN` 9520 `SW CORAL PORTLAND OR 97223 1S126D -04701 to 0 • . .... a SEAFIRST BANK 101 SW MAIN STREET, 16 FLOOR PORI:LAND OR 97204 15126DC -04801 ew .• O .•.'O•• MILLER, BRUCE H MATHESON, ROBERT T .BAXE4e DI19NE 1R 9495 SW LOCUST ST PORTLAND OR 97223 1S126DC- 05000 .*44.4444.44.444 . r a' HAURER, G 0 2517 QUEBEC EUGENE OR "91401` LINCOLN EIGHT LTD. PARTNERSHIP ANN CRESWELL 10250 SW GRENBORG RD SUITE 300 TIGARD 01R 97223 MARILYN HARTZELL 10285 SW 70TH AVE TIGARDr OR 97223 A ,4tA,ta9r-l- 6 1:S135AB -01002 w.•wo•••••d• ••• LINCOLN ILMNTER PHASE V LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 10260 SW GREENBURG RD PORTLAND OR 97204 15135AB -- 01004 •••.• ............ CROW—S-18 #88 10300 SW GREENBURG RD #200 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S1358A- -00100 ..................... FRINGE LAND ORE LTD sr WINMAR PACIFIC -INC PO BOX 21545 LE' WA 98111 1S126DCm 04400 . s ............. MARTIN, ROBERT CLARE bi MM.1 A M 7119 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD PORTLAND OR, 97223 15126DC-04700 .d.to.os...s,.•soe.o. SEAFIRST CORK 892 SECOND AVE SEATTLE WA ,98106 1S126DC -04800 W.• ...a...........o MILLER, BRUCE H AND MATBESON, ROBERT T AND BARER, DIANE R 9495 SW LOCUST PORTLAND (� /p OR 97223 1S126DC- .04900 ..•.d.a..we.o•.o.r.•o BOGUMIL, RICHARD W BAKER, JAMES B 9445 SW LOCUST ST PORTLAND OR 97223 1544 6iyy)� / C..0p� yy00 m. + . o y. o• e•..•...wa LOOS, HARRY AND BEVERLY A 9365 SW LOCUST ST TIGARD ,' OR 97223 J. RANDY KYTE WINMAN COMPANY 700 SW FIFTH AVE SUITE 2600 SEATTLE, WA 98104 -5026 DICK WOELK ATEP, INC. 4040 DOUGLAS WAY LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97035 JACK REARDON, GENERAL MANAGER WASHINGTON SQUARE 9585 SW WASHINGTON SQUARE RD . TIGARD, OR 97223 SCOTT KING WASHINGTON COUNTY DLUT LAND DIVISION SERVICES, 350 --13 155 NORTH FIRST AVE HILLSPORO,, OR 97124 V.I. 1.:.- .un..ru.JYUr•r. 00.0.,004., 0400 Ir r rr 0 0040, . • 0,00.0 .0 rl •i r +,ri +bl�fr.�, r�,+'nnrtMn:p:.o *i Y3�� .4M i i- h(•±F' Pair x'4!5 !OS ;1ttM'rC,r!ri , r"St 4 N r 'Z ktri�w iw H tis. z w #�rh`yM� ?� 1#X »+N...Y•I. �:. »A uY,.�.r +r 4,,O, 0 4.0 rY....v0000/00,. r1 TRUDY KNOW,LES 10430 SW 82ND TIGARD, OR 97223 TROY VANDERHOOF 10181 SW JEFFERSON AVE TIGARD, OR ,97223 -6616 PAT WHITING 8122 SW SPRUCE TIGARD, OR 97223 luY ti r�,�/ ^•: -i(i . . !r•N STATE OF OREGON County of Washington City of Tigard AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING ) ) ss. depose and say: (Please print) being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath That I am a for The City of Tigard, Oregon. That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FORS That I served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: City of Tigard Planning Director ► Tigard Planning commission Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard City Council A (Public wasaring Notice /Notice of Decision) of which is attached (Marked A cch Phknl�. c list marked exhibit each on they _pI day of ¢ on the attached persons fat the d� e�s'�s shownl��_ DECISION as hereto at hed was said notice NOTICE OF DE , posted � �n appropriate in the United on the Mail day of /VF -, 19 ; and deposited bulletin board o a on the � day of k-� MA "e„ postage Prepaid. ..._.... r Prepared, Notice Posted _ For Decision On 1y j, Subs . ribed and ;.sworn /affirm to me on the —t so ho delivered to POST OFFICE day o: y�' PU GO My mmission Expires: NOT PUBLIC O Subscribed and sworn /affirm to me on the day of 19 /, y Je • rt ri DAV. mm A y PUB Po OF OREGON MY Commission Expires: NOT I CE __O F PUBLIC H EA R I N G NOTE CORRECTED F- EARIIVY' DIET"! NOTICE IS HEREBY,GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION, AT ITS MEETING ON MONDAY, March 4, 1991 , • THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BLVD., TIGARD, OREGON WILL CONSIDER AN APPEAL OF DIRECTOR'S ON: 7.3 C PM, IN BLVD., o OREGON, THE DIRECTOR S DECISI FILE NO SDR 90-0022/VAR 90-0033 FILE TITLE: Lincoln Eight APPLICANT: APPELLANT: DECISION ON APPEAL 10260 SW greenbur Rd. #750 Partnership OWNER: Same c" r� Lincoln Eight Lt Tigard, OR 97223 Winmar Co., Inc. 700 Fifth Avenue Suite 2600, Gateway Tower Seattle, WA 98104 -5026 (N]?O #8) The Director has approved, subject to conditions, a Site SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 90 -0022 VARIANCE VAR 90-0033 LINCOLN EIGHT Development Review request to allow construction of a seven- story, 140,000 square foot office building and a three- level parking garage. The Director has the building to be 90 feet whereas the maximum building the PP ing height alloWed in th e C -P zone is 45 feet, and 2) to reduce the size of required Parking stalls from 9 feet to 8 feet. ZONE: C -P (Commercial Professional). APPLICABLE APPROVAL CRITERIA: Tigard Community Development Code Chapters • site Development Review Approval Standards - Code Section ion 18.32, 18 -, 64, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, 18.134; 18.164 (Source. S g 1 18.120.180), and Comprehensive Plan Polioies 2.1.1, 4.2.1, 5.1.1, 7.1.2, 7.4.4, 7.5.1, 7.5.2, 7.6.1, 8.1.1, 8.1.2, 8.1.3, 8.2.2, 9.1.1, and 9.1.3. g ( WCTM 151 35AB, tak lot 1000). 10250 SW Greenbuz Road LOCATION: (See Map On Reverse Side) THE PUBLIC �,� .:COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT R WILL BE CODE PROCEDURE ADOPTED E RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 IN ACCORDANCE WITH T E AND RULES OF PROCDDURE' UBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER CONDUCTED I PIED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL,,, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. ANY PERSONS HHEARD, OR TESTTIMONY, MAY BE SUBMITTED I WRITING TO � BE ENTERED INTO THE RECORD OF THE HEARING. MREC CODE OR APPEAL, AND FAILURE TO SA ICI ' . T COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT SP);CI�Y THE CRITERION ISSUE FROM THE RCOMMLI�I BY Y, DEVELOPMENT AN WHICH A COMMENT IS DIRECTED PRECLUDES AN APPEAL BASED ON'THAT CRITERION. 13125 S49 MALL BLVD. OR CONTACT YOUR NEIGHBORH0O DEPARTMENT AT 639-41711 TIGARD CITY BALL HALL PLEASE CONTACT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION r � ORGANIZATION D PLANNING CHAIRPERSON: , Mai. ~ilyILHartaell PHONE NUMBER: 245-5299 cORAL toe. T ELEAF S.W. • E L6'uo 5'1 14S S9E6 n r. Vin,/ EZZI.6 UO aii zs i;AOCXI 1!S'. St'' '6 11 =fur 'Emma ki 'm b a'moowera•••••• • ►r•••••• 00610 09Z st EZZL6 )10 v�v 0273 X=1301 I 561,6 11 =VICE '11221101 OWE X. =OM eliOSIERWS1 u=am 901086M WIJAMICIIS 0 •—••.► ••w•ranw••• 00L 0 0019{at.w7v0. EZZL6 TLV ONi<'rl:rsdl6'i.. =MI SI3XYLLIEL bib "r.lZ`. et • e/.es r as so • so se is • • • N • • • O 1 86 /4 St STZ =SI CA 131y 0 11 Gan 0 yam. ••••••• •••••O.O`r•••. 00T00- stt l w -r EZZL6 NO �L OOZ# 801 111-Z-15083 • • 44 40 r 4 r 44 4 r Tr0ZL6 ' 110 O an tdr"' MS oyeat antsurmicama cratra X A 2Isvitaa trI033EIM . w r w r �n • r r••• r w w w r,y�Q�± L6D ° awrma. V BIOL. MS SSZO1 EZZL6 110 sCaNDIX. 00E SIMS ati DtlailiVan MS OSZOI .. z � *GM XIB913 MOB TO/a6 EINa003 > LTSZ ix ;D ,siakwa a • 0O0S0-009Zin a..aaAorvaaaw..m4M EZZL6 a0 ZS Z$0 MS S6) 6 3MICLU z JAMMU ' osam aanua l rr•••••"r•wo•••••••• 808 9Z S6... rO? L6 to 0 13001Ea 91 sZi1 1.5 U.1C MS TOT u xsztargas •.'.00OY14�000a0 ra�p•waaos TOLtlti.: sic.. EZZL6 410 a n�yy 00 0ZS6 MarrillE a �1 •wam• • a•••••"'"••••• ooSN0- 0a9zist ,. EZZL6 110 a v SE9EZ XOL oa E 1`S NOX411111SUM 215 SOS6 MCI :a110 20kinta 000�••.w +'r•m+ow0.• ZV`O EIST EZZL6 10( y�Q�ry �3 br 00C OT 1 CC`• ilinSUITIWinta 2:Sitilla =NM lr1 ••.•O• b..••••• 4•• q••m• .. 001K0- 11SETST $3ZZL6 a 96ES =XI 0 a 591 aaoasola I ' •••••••••M.••"°••••••r £oot Etst EZZL6 110 e 45L L& D'INEN13g89 ! ' 09201 ainSIENDava ItrAGE VN"d6+I autruuoa P "XE3 "(BOO TINOIL iaaIN 1 . :.. 006e0--'SCSE S SCOTT KING WASHINGTON iiLUT LAND DIVISION SERVICES, 350-13 155NRTHF AVE HIlralL.SBORO CR 97124 a . RANDY KYTE wry COMANY 700 SW FIFTH AVE SUITE 2600 SEATTLE, WA 981045026 TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY RECEIVE, JO 2`, City of Tigard ODD Box 23397 Tigard, Or 97223 O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684-0360 BEAVERTON OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising Legail IT 7799 Notice SITE DEVELO1EN'T,lVI1~.iR 90-00 CI Tee rsheet NoticE The Director has approved, �nbject to conditions,,,a Sit" Review request to allow con Stnctiion of a seven- story, El Duplicate Affidav foot office building and a turce -level parking garage. T also .approved associated' Variance requests to 1) ';allow building to be 90 feet whereas the maximum' building :he the C -P zone is 45`°feet; and 22,,to reduce the size of requirr from 9 feet to 8' feet. ZONE.'C- P(Commercia.l LOCATION 10250 S.W. Gr nbttrg R i d (V1CT1 1$ 1 ,AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss` Judith Koehler being first duly sworn, depose and so that the Advertising D iirector, or his principal clerk, of the .gar. imes a newspaper of general circu tion as defined in ORS 193,010 es and 193.020; published at in the aforesaid county and state; that a Zits Development Review- 590 0022 VAR9O -003. a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for ` One successive and consecutive in the following issues: Janttay 10, 1.991 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 10th . day of January 1991, Ljr4-(74,t) My Co m ieoion Expires: A F DAVIT 0 Notary Public for Oregon /9 APPLICABLE AP1'1ROVA , RITER' . Ti ' Development Code Chapters 18 ;,' 18.100, 18.114,18.120, 18.134; and 18.164: (Source` Site e�'el Approval Standards Code Section 18.120.180); and Plan ?Polici.. 2.1.1, 4.2.1, 5.1.1, 7.1.2,'7.4 4h 1,5.1, 7.5! 8.1�'?.',''8.1,3, 8.2.2, 9.1.1, and 9,1.x; gu MY ruAs i4d4ki Ont 1a he ado red fndin.. of facts,.decision, and statement of c obtained frarirt.1* Planning Department, Tigard C vic Ce Box 23397,'A'ig,�ird, Oregon 91223. Tice. final on iii L . 19 1. �A pnrt to the decision' decision in dancewith Section 18.32.290(A) anti. S of the Cprnrnunitj �Devclopmennt Code, which prbv dc' appeal may,,be fi led on City or Tigard appeal forms with notice 1s given and sent. The deadline for filing of ate ap; 1*-try41 91. The hung on an app be,15e11 x blis i J y t0, 1991. AI tl" 1' 4 ty of Tigard Box 23397 gate, Or 97223 TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY .O, DOX 370 PHONE (503) 684 -0360 INA 22, ctri Iii BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising Legal T ' 7799 Notice 1� Ei' iEW»T 1 1 �i S Tt 90 -0022 A IANC' 3 L1NCQ_ ii1.'l" , 9 w, (NPO #8 0 Tearsheet Director; has approved, subject to'condit ons, a Site L yelop neat Rev ew r uest,to allow construe Lion of a s n-str ry, t:d ,00 s uaite 0 Duplicate Affidav , foot office; building aria a thine -lrvel parking gare ed The Director has also approved associated;.Variat ce r°equests, to 1) allow the height of the' building:to be 90:feeet whereas the iki�ikdirstirh,building height `allowed" n the C :P zone is 45 'feet; and 2) €o're duce..the size of required; parking, stalls'' from► 9. feet to; 8 feet. Z NE: _GPI' (Coifi ciercial Professional). g t �.00Ai"ION. 1'0250.5�1�` Cxreenbtrr :��d (WCTI� �.813�An tax la AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION ATE OF OREGON, UNTY OF WASHINGTON, ass, Judith Koehler • ing first duly sworn, depose and s that the Advertising ector, or his principal clerk of the lgarat Ames i newspaper r of general circul�� as defined in ORS 193.010 d 193.020; published at in the i e Development Review-8 • reseid county and state,; that Review-8 tig 90- oo22 /vAR9o-0o33 • tinted copy of which is hereto anneXed was ,published in the tire issue of said newspaper for One successive and tis €r'utive in the following issues nuary 10j 1991 ti bscribed and sworn to before me thisldth day of January 1991; d Notary Public: for Oregon /9 �cttuiiision Expires: ' .It 3a, my • APPLId'ABL.E APPRO AL C RITE .IA: Tigard Community Development code Chapters 18 10t , 8,108 18.114, 18.12;0,18 134; and 18.164 (Source. Site 1,cvelopment Reviev±t Approval „Standards .Code .Sectio 8`.120 180 ; .acid compirehenoivel Platr'P0.6ie,, 2 ;1 x.5;2, /-6,1, (S.Lil 8, ,8.1.3,8.2.2,9.1.1,an(19.1.3`. y r.� A$140 44 I \, Il�.y The adopted finding of: facts, c euision,}a1nd, statenienVof conditions cast `b.ye obt ned. f"rO�ni-the Planning l epartment, Tigard Civic Centers 1312 d ; ITa1t -Blvd , P.(). Box 23397, Tigard, Orego `` 9127f . The. decision, shall be' fin l nn ;J .ntit�ry 2 5 1991. Any part. to the`hreeision may,appeal this decision in .accordance W A :Section 18.32,290(A) and Section •x1'8.32.370 of the Commu ity Development` C1ode .which provides that a rit en. appeal may be filed on City of Tr ard apj caf forms,Within 10 dayys after notice is given land sent. The deadline for filing o'E ao appeal is 3.30 P. . ran ry 25.1999 .he hearing on an'ap will ne De Novo. TT " 99 Publish anuary 10,1.991. i arlivirES PUBLISHING COMPANY P;0, BOX 370 PHONE (500) 684-0360 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising City of Tiard P.O0Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 C> Tearsheet Not, 1 Legai 1' ' 7819 Notice p 003 jrNcoLN, j TAT Affidl to eondition5, a Site i p �Re�vicw r q est tehls �a a seven story, `140,000 s nacre fdo" ,, e, .rn � � t pfl�,�e bUaldx>1g4arid ra `ter.,,: garage 'n T hector has also approved associated Vari. to 1 ilow t0 "herglai oft to building t ' be 9.0 feat wher'eas,t buildin height allowed in`tne C-P zo y, s�z of regntr d', air n'ri stalls"froaa�9.feet to 8 fact ZO1`+ c cia,i Profcssicna ).",LOCATJON. 10250 ,5. 1 $ 1 3,SA,E, tax. ;lot 1000) ixeenurg 0 Duplicate AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF ORErf)N, COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss, Judith Koehler being first duly sworn depose and say iat I p � �; �n�ne Advertising Director, or his principal clerk, of the gar Imes a newspaper of general cir iation as defined in ORS 193-010 and 193:020; 'published at 1:1garu in the aforesaid county and state; that the --- Ate fear w., SDR 90 -0022 a printed copy of which is Hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for One successive and consecutive in the following issues'. AL IV Scbscribed ttnd sworn . before me this 'I at dav 4 ritpa, y ray G"tanih issi in fires; • APFID+AV T Notary Public for Oregon LICABLE APPROVAL cRITER,T, 'T'i ard tax l i3" . m ii18. dent Odc eta � b Co i ► p ',04, 18,1011, .8.102; Z8,1t)6 18' 18.110, 18'314, and 1.8,1 :Source: Sit ti.., Slaf bards - 2oc1c Sectionn 18.1120,150 , an e�eicprelie sive '2.1.1,4.21 . 5 :1�, 'i +1,� 7 �4 �y d +CO�ie r �`nsiy +, X5 2 2; 9:.1,x, and9 ;x,3. ' ' t7.5,271,1 �' ; , a, '1 1, t, , 0 , 4 :I4, -) :i'. �o si rf ihAt r: it ill ' x11S DECISJC�N WAS ILA ►�t1V�l��,�C��,�t✓��"��iTED LATER �'T1',�,N t'�.��`+ EXTEND., The adopted t LY1 ' 1 F , PPrtAL P,EP,, + 111 ed litiding.of facts recision arJd 1'3/hurls Sa x be obtained 6zot Plannin Departinciit, Tigard ,C vi �.'� 1;�5 8,'V�`, Fall Blvd '` ; ��, ,� .. 5, shall; c; ,� Box 23397 Tigard, Ore 0. :9/'- .dt al rapt PEBl__t 4y 9 1, , may ,appeal this deei ;ion in accordrrar a ,Station 1: 3, ;2 o Sooticrc. �5.82�3/0 ci",ilie C � that nl7 ray. �e �1�� ity �ave�o rrlerit C�di✓ � , i t a written eat on City '�l fot 1 ays yf`ter� n ttc "is given an,, soft, 'lie d l± dlme fo a�rrn is ,M, f RJ f a i n4,.. x rilr.e ° :Y 4 Th6 It } tvo,�, " 1'y r. carhg alt Publ7, h' , annoy 31,1; fi • 4PP w rare as +` r city of Tiard P.OBox 23397 'Ti. 1;q 5Y • ssc TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684.0360 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising ' Legal TT 7819 Notice 0 Duplicate Affidi _ ;taQT oWand31 re 3fl Tearsheet Notir .ev) r7hc►e Di.�tr% te �cstJ: o lra has � o ,a A. i p allr a1 oaysetnd l �s;tu io fl We et, t a seven stpryr i.40,(0O square loot of lice ,buildi g.an 'a three level parks Bard OR 97223 ing ga rage, ,The° 1rDirector has':also approve associated Variance requests • to +, ).allow height the ' building a 0 fe t to s` tie maxim m hur d n height 4allowe in th' #`'C -1 zone s99' 45 feet• a dV2). to seduce the t IG l' req u' red par i g stalls grri 9 fit tb S feet t O P : cxal Frofessio a1 i 1C, C T'ION: 250 G eenburgr.Road 35AB +� �, 1ta : hS� iia�c�lvt 7�1� AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TATE OF OREGON, ) OUNTY OF WASHINGTON, i a. Judith Koehler e1t first duly sworn, depose and say fiat 1 he Advertising irector, or his principal clerk, of the 'cigar imes newspaper of general cir Jation as defined in ORS 193.010 nd 193.020; published at Llgardl in the foresail county and state; that the oti- - af— 1),H or-.,-- , --4-.- D 9(.1 -x022 printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the ntire issue of said newspaper for One successive and ansecutive in the following issues:. Iran, 1 1 991 ubscribed and sworn y 'Ci iti. ssion FIFl1'VIT' rl before nie wary it es� Notary) Public for Oregon 1,„*.e);;;e0 APP4ICAB E APp110'A,�+L,CI dTERIA: Tigard Community .1 e;velo ment'Code;IChaplexs 1'8.64, 18100, 18,102, 1;$ ►106, 18.1;08;,'1$.,11: 18 ►12x,18. 34, andk18.164 f54urc6 Site; ievelopment`;ReAO. ''' p Stanch `ds F- Cody Section y18 ►1.203180) and,'Compri:hensiv : Plan 5.1.1 7.1.;2, ';4.4, 7,55..1, '105,1r-7►6.1, 8.1.1 8.1.2, 4,1.1, an I4: ti; • 11111" .: na IMO I ses at 1 I�y n ' THIS DECISION' S IS S` ED LATER THAN ORI T L PLANNED. CONSEQ tNTL TEE APP t . , EXTEND► The adopted finding of facts, decision, and statemex t of,condi thins can be obtained from the 'lnniieing Dcp tment, Tigard C vic Ce 13125 S.W. mall Blvd.. P.O. Box. 23397 Tig d, Ore; do decision shall be'final oniFEBR'UAl_ty 4 991 Any party t o t h .d tsion e ee r ' may appeal this decision in aceafdartce wifih Section 18.3 a290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the +Community Development Code, which provides ti atla, written appeal may he leld on'City ofTigard ap a1 forms within jl 10 days jafter not}r�o�e is gi�v�}e'n artd scat . Th - , a 11m fo )iii is.'3r30 A i i BJ UAR�.i« 4y�/1.99113. � c,(.) ovo.' �u. 7819 — Publish Jan 0 STATE OF OREGON County of Washington City of Tigard 4R� AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING sse , being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say: (Please Print) That I am a �" / t for The City of Tigard, Oregon° That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: That I served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Planning Commission Tigard Hearings officer Tigard City Council. A copy (Public Hearing Notice /Notice' of Decision) Of which is attached (Marked Exhibit "A ") was mailed to each named persons at the address shown on the attached list marked exhibit "B" on the i 2-'r'L day of said notice NOTICE OF attached, appropriate F DECISaI©PI as hereto att�achecid wad pasted on a appropriate bulletin board on the day of , 19 ; and deposited in the United Staten Mail on tha 12,:M , day of 1 �'L4 L Cage prepaid, 'Pte pared ep d Notice Posted or (F Dec :si n Onl?,yl 'L i scribed and Sworn/affirot to me on the et -•n w delivered to POST OFFICE aribed a.nd Sworn after to / firm � :ode on the _ _ day o: day of ..r "NOTARY PUBLIC OF QRR My Commission Expires: ;: H ufi de 4 I/ 'CI,t,e NOT. '4 PUBLX OF OREGON My Comilission Expires: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION, AT ITS MEETING ON MONDAY, March 3, 1991 , AT 7 :30 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BLVD., TIGARD, OREGON, WILL CONSIDER AN APPEAL OF THE FOLLOWING DIRECTOR'S DECISION_ FILE NO SDR 90-0022 /VAR 90-0033 FILE TITLE. Lincoln Eight APPLICANT APPELLANT: DECISION ON APPEAL: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 90 -0022 VARIANCE VAR 90 -0033 LINCOLN EIGHT'. (NPO p � quest to .al ' con Otructiontof to a seven-story, d s, 140,000 #8 The Director has approved, � 00 square foot Review office building and a three- level parking' garages The Director has also approved associated Variance requests to 1) allow the height of the building to be 90 feet whereas the maximum building height parking in from 9, feet to 8 feet. ZONE. the size of required allowed in the C-P zonecid 45 feet, and 2) to reduce.t C-P (fozrequired Professional) Lincoln Eight Ltd. Partnership 10260 SW Greenburg Rd. #750 Tigard, OR 97223 Winmar Co., Inc. 700 Fifth Avenue Suite 2600, Gateway Tower Seattle, WA 98104 -5026 OWNER Same APPLICABLE APPROVAL CRITERIA: Tigard Community Development 18.32, 18.64, 18.100 , 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120 18.164 (Source: Site Development Review Approval Standards 18.120.180); and Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 4.2.1, 7.4.4, 7.5.1, 7.5.2, 7.6.1, 8.1.1, 8.1.2, 8.1.3, 8.2.2, 9.1. Code Chapters , 18.134; and - Code Section 5.1.1, 7.1.2, .1, and 9.1.3. 10250 SW Greenburg Road (WCTM 1S1 35AB, tai lot 1000). (See Map On Reverse Side) ` A MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER M COMMUNITY MA DEVELOPMENT � o >3Y TF�E HAPTER 18 32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED THE PUBLIC FARING ON FORTH IN T GARD CITY .30 C)U ANY FEI'tSONS AVAILABLE HAVING IN7.ERE T c � HALL OR RULES OF k'ROCIEDURE SF;T FO • ~ F;NTEiD INTO THEE RECORD T iE HEFRD GR CHAPTER 8 IN TESTIMONY MAY BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO RE � HEARING. N OR BY LETTER PRECLUDES AN APPEAL, AND FAILURE TO SPECIFY THE ` CRITERION FROM THE C0 . COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT FAILURE TO F+.A SE AN ISSUE IN PERSON DEVELOPMDNT CODE OR WHICH A COMMENT 18 DIRECTED PRECLUDES AN APPEAL BASED ON THAT CRITERION. HALL, 13125 SW HALL BLVD., OR CONTACT YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD DEPARTMENT AT 639-4171, TIGARD CITY GHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION OR � RTHER INFORMATION (NPO) # ._�_. CHAIRPERSON: Marilyn. Hartzell, NGTON IRE I 4600 ;WNW* CRESCENT GROVE !�. = CEMETERY. == _` !l ii i S.W. r. t N�l11 L =cwtT S.W. Sire C 0.1 S.W. 1,, ill, LEHMANN nim. 077 11! MAn2LELEAF S- .�c S.W, SHAD L aVo. r cla ‚II • BORDERS Mom Min Min u • 4 • • • . it e.. 0 ORAL as 077 11! MAn2LELEAF S- .�c S.W, SHAD L aVo. r cla ‚II • BORDERS Mom Min Min u • 4 • • • . it . J. S135A3 -0090® o0 oa•o of m •w +mm d SEA IW ATIONAL CORP. BY: CROW PORT PORTL.AND MANAGEMENT PARTNERSHIP 10260 SW GREENBURG RD SUITE 750 TIGARD • OR 97223 1.S135AB- 01003 .....YOilw!!mmliYOOiO• CROW—SPIEICER—HOSPORD #65 DX TRAMMELL CROW CO 10 BOX 5396 PORTLAND OR 37228 1S135A11 -03400 Y! i0i�lAilOOliliei LINCOLN W NTKR PHASE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 10300 SW GREENBURG T 11200 MG371,AND OR 97223 1S135BA -00102 lY00dl000► /MINCE LAND ORE LTD 9585 SW WASFIINGTON SQ 'RD PO BOX 23635 TIGARD 41e4150..i 410400 OR 97223 3.S126DC -- 04500 : • o 4.0004140 00om DRIUXARD L XI4N 9520 SW CORAL PORTLAND OR 97223 1S126DC-04701 e...oiwlol..sc� m wee ' SEAVIRST BAG 101 SR MAIN STREET, 16 PR POR:LAI OR 97204 1S3.26D►C -04801 •...Nl00lm 0!! 0. m00:r40 • litaczTat,, nvxrcv 9I MATHESON, '.BB L`, BPICER, DIANE It 9495 SR LOCUST ST PORTLAND OR 97223 1S126D 0500 ®. G D 2517 QTJ'E9BEG EUGENE OR 97401 ;Ira EYE LTD PAI'NP ANN CRESWELL 10250 SW GREEN BURG RD SUITE 300 TIGARD, OR 97223 MARILYN itiAterzEr,L 10285 SW 7011i AVE TIGARD, ■' = 97223 =scour r`.e .' ,...a at rimsEr M LIMITED PFARTNERSHIP 10260 SW CREENBURG RD PORTLAND OR 97204 1 135AB -01004 i0!41.404 Y•0l.00.004 144100 188 10300 SW GREENBMIG RD 1200 NVOIEMAND 0P. 97223 1S13513/1-00100 .0�i /00•iY Y0 /ii10 i'YOi OlO NLAND ORETLp CD M BOX 21545 I SEATTLE WA 98111 1S1261 4400 Yi/Y� ♦i•li VYi lO O..... • MARTIN, ROBERT au= • 7119 STiW TA RS IMRRX ND +[ TRAIN'/ OR 97223 /S126100-04700 ee!(fi00.440• •O....e SJEATIRST CORP 092 SECOND AVE SEATTLE 1SI26DC-04800 11130MEIt, BRUCE' It ?N D MATHESON, ROBERT T AND BASER, DIANE R 9495 SR LOCUST PORTLAND 15126904900 BOGUMILe IRICEAMO W BAIKER, JAMFS B 9445 SW LOCUST PORTLAND OR 97223 98106 OT 97223 Y0 0 G! Y.!! i ..! m. A!Y 1S126DC-05100 d. Y.na. ml4Yi LOOS, 'WkiRE C' AND BEVERLY A 9365 SW LOCUST TIGARD a a 411 a. 0 00. 91223 Y•+••••Nl+/i+ V, r rr1•Y.wW U •w+•www�rs,,�.y�y ..� K�µ�. .�U1• y�, 'YL 1 "'�; v�n11.r i4 i,r }]! il'`` �i.^ �ti `•NJC✓�.'�•�If1•i'M•a'••.i�•r�i 7K!Ti4r`',7•; 'i's�• .i�"i'•r ! i yn •r TRU1Y ):'ES 10430 SW 82ND TIQARD, OR 97223 TROY VAI' D1E E OOF 10.81 SW JEFFERSON R AVE TIGARD OR 97223-6616 DICK WDFLK ATRP, INC. 4040 DOUGLAS WAY LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97035 JACK REARDON GENERAL MANAGER WASHINGTON ¶QUARE 9585 SW WA. HINGTON SQUARE RD. TIGARD, OR 97223 Scci KING WASHINGTON COUNTY /*XT LAND DIVISION SERVICES, 35043 155 .NORTH FIRST AVE HILLGSHORO, OR 97124 • n Ir•r•J • 4,41. r,jwyr...•• L•Y.•rWrAwrrw•+YIwNr.Mwj »Wr•• •••∎•,. •4' •• J` ~•'•V•■� ... •id+I, i 'leOli'0 ` "'�j,;'• "44.? !?%i! '4'�•r�j*A.4° y..,. r 1 .- '"'W^•'" R° '... J, RANDY XYTE WINMAR COMPANY 700 SW FIFTH AVE SUITE .600 SEATTLE, NA 98104-5026 PAT WHITING 8122 SW SPRUCE .. TI OR 9722 ., CS P ., r. o CTY OF TIGARD, OREGN SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION CTTY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639 -4171 1. GENERAL INFORMATION PROPERTY ADDRESS /LOCATION' Tig td, nr� nn 97223 TAX MAP AND TAX 1 1 enbur Road LOT NO. s135AB, Lo #1000 SITE SIZE 4.32 Ar.re PROPERTY OWNER /DEED HOLDER *_ Lincoln Eight Ltd. Partne ADDRESS 10260 S.W. S ;.enbu;l g, 5( HONE 245-9400 CITYF Tigard OR ZIP g779 APPLICANT* '1� ,1n s n .i Li.. iit si. Par_ nP.rship ADDRESS PHONE CITY' ZIP _ When the owner and the applicant are ifferent r people, the applicant must be' the purchaser of record or a leasee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner with written authorization: The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on Page two or submit a written authorization with t'iis application. 2Q PROPOSAL SUMMARY The owners of record of the subject property request site development review approval'to ,allow enn -riic ti nn. of A 7 -story of: 3.c bu }lding. 0524P/13P Rev'd 5/87 FOR. STAFF USE ONLY CASE No. spg. 67 - 0car OTHER. CASE NO'S: -/ F.. �- RECEIPT NO I APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY:: DATE: ` cr -". r.2 '!, '70 2�s -z3 Re Application elements submitted: r. A) Application form (1) V(B) Owner's signature /written authorization (C) Title transfer instrument (1) D) Assessor's map (1) ship a E .lot pl (pre, app checklist) Applicant s statement pre -app checklist) ro + U)s. .LCapex,#„3,y;,�wners and aadr 6e°s 0 :n n r2'Suleet (1) i )y 'fling fee ( � 1 `.✓ ) (I) Construction Cost Estimate DATE DETERMINED. TO DE COMPLETE: FIND, DECISION DEADLINE: CO ifrb PLAN /ZONE DESIGNATION: 'ctk.ar.-- N . P .O , Number: Approval Date: Final Approval Date: Planning Engineering : ati 3. List any variance, conditional use, sensitive lands, or other land use actions to be considered as part of this application h_�,3r�ance 4. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above 'request does not violate axn;y restrictions restr ions that may be T c attached to or imposed upon the subject property. B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted terms subject and ranted. in accordance with the terms and pub 'e�ct to• all the conditions limitations of the approval. C. Al! of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this may any statements are application ma b t e revoked if it is found that an such s false. D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the p o ivies and criteria, and under stands the re quirements for approving oving or denying the application. DATED this y of ,,..6�E.��$lb�_.... 19-9-p SIGNATURES of each owner f eg. husband and wife} of the subject property. (KSL:pm105241 ) 4 rM1°rll��IN "11ri�hi ��r4 ku�Me�J {�4T'�. td- (filoot\ « " ' ' °i .3 Yr , 1 1._ ; AMC , 17(0 TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY / DAVID BLAKE IN(. I-IM /MILLS /MAPTINDALE ARCHITECTS B AUGH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY BUDGET ESTIMATE fife L- Centel A <wks AUGUST 10, 1990 ***Note: THIS ESTIMATE REFLECTS A FIVE STORYY BUILDING 9168 SF TOTAL **1ST Floor 18' -4 "** **12.87 feet floor to floor** UNIT E:i_DC� COST /BLDG S QOANTIT'? 'F ICE. rOT ►•. t71.;1:i<< =a fF SITE PREPARATION Layout i us Clearing/Asphalt R:arnclyaI Maas Excavation-Bldg Mass Excavation-Site Stu tura l F i l l Grading Demo Ex stiols Building 2 SITE UTILITIES Water Se r•'a i c e Fire ser "v i ce Storm Sewer ke I ncate MH "s /UD" s L,a:c kf l w 'halve /Vau l t Sits L i 1 h t r, g / F'n w+e r ITE L)E�,�ELOPr'IENT Sidewalks Entry Slabs Extrude] Curbs A.1phalt F`a'vina (.2 liA P1a rerner, a Mark i n 3 5 FI :. irrJ' +n +Ft d•1 1 1,4 cr-" 71240 sf 1528 bcy 1111:r bcy 1f5 4 bcy 50815 sf ='i5t,i c Subtotal $500.00 $tD .10 $6 .00 $6.0t 00 $0.10- $4.00 40 If 4u if $22.00 40 I+ 11 ea $'ad t.0 : 0 I s $121000.00 Subtuta ubl: $:1,000 $7,124 8 $9 + +! � , �_I f $6,660 $12,272 $F1,062 $6226 ...$2A788..: $0.08; $o.0R $0.10 $0.07 $0.1: 0 „O6, 0.16 $0 . 6lr ' $0.01 $0.tu �1 $0.02 $o.t:ar_'1 $4) 1: ,too *0:,01•••••• f) 1, TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY / DAVID E:LAK INGRIM/MILLS/P1ARTIND.ALE ARCHITECTS BAUGH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY BUDGET ESTIMATE file L- Center A.wks AUGUST 10, 1990 Grade Beams Structural excavation Elevator pit walls Slab on Grade :1 ELEVATED STRUCTURE lrsui Idin % Co l umns:'For-m And pour Columns: rebar Shear Wal I s:-r "arm and pour Shear Walls;r "char Elevated S l abs a form arid pour-, Elevated slabs:rebar Elevated slabs; P.T. Elevated beam= . rwebar- Eleva.ted beams: PET,' Elevator mac h i rye slab Penthouse roof structure Penthouse wall strut,lure Embedded Mist:, Iron Equipment pads, Hoistin8 Rebar Des i Sri Cort I n� ericy Partial, Mechanical' Scr e'en Vaulted Roof Str-!ur tur°, Concrete H:,r' C ***Note: THIS ESTIMATE REFLECTS A FIVE ETORYY BUILDING 91630 SF TOTAL *1ST Floor 18' -4°** **12.67 feet floor to floor** UNIT , BLDG COST/BLDG SF s:UANTIT't PRICES T: TAL (913 0 "F7 60 cy ERE cy 288 sf 18360 sf Subtotal 2132 If 2122 I f 7991 sf . r:r 7998 sf 91180 sf 911RO of 91180 sf 91180 sf 91150 sf a 00 sf 720 sf 1620 sf 91180 f 10 cy 1 1S cD lb 450 'ef 1680 sf �I 480 sf Subtotal'. $330.00 $19,800 $0 . 2 $10.00 $2,18810 $0.03 $1,85 $331966 p0.27 $34.24 $8.36 $12.06 $1.44 .r, '$0.46 $$0.42 0.48 $0.48 $6.00 5.00 $4i00 015 5216.00 $801000.00 $0.00 $8.00 $9.90 $185,211 $2.0 (37000 $177824 $96,456 $11,517 $48i,480 $411948 $43,766 _,8.29r_I $427766 8600 $13,6(7 $80,000 1 $0 531488 1:s,441) $4 91'160 $0.80 $0.20 Kry, F.: $1.06 $0.13 KPFF; '_f 04/S $5.27. $0.46 KPFF% 1.2#/S $0.48 . KFFGF>f 0.44/E $0.42 KF-F '% 1,1#/'S $0.48 KPFFti0.4 /SF, $0.0$ $0.04 $0.07 $0.15 $0.02 $0.88 $0.00 $0.04 $0.15 ra TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY / DAVID BLAKE E INGR /MILLS /MARTINDAI_'.E ARCHITECTS ***Note: THIS ESTIMATE REFLECTS A FIVE STORYY BAUGH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY BUILDING 91880 SF TOTAL BUDGET 'ESTIMATE file L- CenterA. wks * *1ST Floor. 13' -4"** AUGUST 10, 1990 **12.67 .67 'feet floor to floor** UNIT BLDG COST/BLDG SF' QUANTI -Y PRICE TOTAL; (91360 SF) Floors 1>>5t Aluminum Entry', Doors .' ,r ?', Pr, $3,500 ., 00 $7 ,000 $0.08 Strip W i rd ow s 8' -8", i g • 18462 sf, $14.00 $258,468 $2 , s..._, Spandrel Glass : 961ji' sf $17.00 $67,456 $0.74 Curtain Wa I 1 3 � 19.00 sf $A5,550 $0.72 LIP Er -Ictk @ 1st Flo, ' 2966 sf, $12.00 $3,5E10 $0.39 Brick Panels 0520 sf $15.50 $163,060 $1.78 990 sf $17 00 $16 , ,0 $0.1R Cr� i r N Co I urnn r; l aa� �j i rr �� , � , 7 penthouse wall s (metal) 1820 sf 4,0o $6,480 $0,07 Brick sup p ii r-t : ernbetd ari (e- di a.; o r'i a l supports-8' c Exter-ior, rntI -stud fr°aminia: 2.5° Metal, Studs wiI Rock Hollow , Metal Doors Ex ter° i iir" Call l C•• i rig ,Roof Hatch @ Stair Sheetrneiia I Columntovers 12670 sf $1.00 $12,670 $0.14 1 ea $500,00 $500 $0,01 4220 If $1.7E1 $7,38 .,_, 1 ea $2,500.00 10.00 $2 1 E,00 $0.03 2 el $150.00 $3,750 $0.04 7 , THERMAL AND i I'J l T LIFE PROTECTION Eii'►;�I�e poly r1;ififiria uv_'r` R19 Flash,' n3 /cofuri zar°t' 1 ash Br•Ica:: Sealer (LIP) Roof F'atrapet c ,r r.s7r Wa l l Insulation R 1:=: 1 i r,ei^aflrr' :17; Vau I ae o l" 1<:Z 36 sf $2.2 $42,855 $0.47 110 I f $6.50 $6,160 i0 $0.07 2i?A5 sf $0.85 $1,02,8 $c,J + 0 1 560 I f $6.00 . $31360 $0.04 /8603 s•f $0.351 $6,476 $0.07 280 I f $0.9.1 sa i <<_. °:r? r o . i:., 4t i;9 .. 1680 sf ,$�`... o0 '$6, 'w' , .r i.,a r • 6' TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY / DAVID BLAKE I1 GRIM /I1IL1.C/ MARTINDALE ARCHITECTS ***Note: THIS ESTIMATE REFLECTS A FIVE E'TIJRYY J AUGH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY BUILDING 91830 SF TOTAL BUDGET ESTIMATE file L- Ceriter A. wl•: • '1^T Floor- 13,-4.14* AUGUST 10, 1990 **12.67 .67 feet floor to floor** UNIT LLDG COST/BLDG SF QUANTITY PRICE TOTAL (:1: 60 SF) Flooring (Marble -Th €'n set) F I oorr i n; (Carpet) Ce i 1 i rng (Gyp ' Board) Inter- i or storefront doors Corri dor walls Lobby Walls Wood Tr-i rti /t. ar'e 1 i n0 A Faint walls /ce€ l in; s Fi r-edof.rrs Entry Goa l k:of f fats Handra i 1 t Wall Stair Handrail Lobby Stairway Fountain A11Owance lowance 948 'sf N 1 C 3498 s f 1 pr 34 sf 2666 sf 1 Is 7886 sf 1 pr 144 si 66 1 If 1. $1 $115 $ 1 Is $40 $15.00 $0. 00 *4.00 750.00 *2.90 {,:10t:) c_r jJrt tt 250.00 $12, {:l$12,00 $1210.. 00 $75.(tf 000.00 000.00 $14,220 $0 13992 $5,250 $10,127 $15,000 $1,250 $1,728 $1,980 f 8{wl $7200 $F,000 $40,000 $0.00 $0..15 $0.04 $0.11 $0.09 $0.16 r'_r $0 c r ,�t $0.01 $0.02 $0.02 $0.08 $t ?05 *0.44 ,Second F' l oor I ob ,y; Flf :cr".irfg(M,.r•b1e /C.arpet) NIC r<N s $0 C a i n r (GYP Board), 0r00 :� fi..:t $0.11 Interior u t f r s f r i t i Doors w es. 750.00 1, $31500 $0,04 • Cor°r-idor- Walls. 2160 .sf $2,90 *6+1:264 $0.0 Lobby Wal l s 1972 5f r.3 _ ..;f5 _ r ,. 0= Wood 1 " i n / F a r t Al A l l � w a r c 1 ' 0 ( . . , , ! ) . 0 0 $0.07 $0.05 i ) s r : { o Paint Wal € s/C 1 i r s $2,208 $0.01" E l euator- Lobby Floors ,-,.r FIocrjin3(Marwble /Car ~ptiet) WO' so.otr $ 0 $0.00 Wo:,j Tr-1 rtj /Facie 1 1 rf A 1 1 our'a,rsc e I t s $9, 000,00 $91000 .$0.10 E'a i n' Mails 141=',2 sf: wt.) . 40 .$1.593 $0.01 Gy .' psurn E;cfar"d Ce 1 1 i ri' s NIC $0.00 $0 $0.00 Shof b Waal I .'F 1 ``•5 -22995-'.sf 10. a u ; $7 y 7 $082 Corridor l►ia1=Is : -~~ 0.!.$f ttr;o{r lr $ 0.00 i-o_ s t r- cn Wa l _+a sf w.. .) $12,885 *M R w� s y r o"� : ril : C e; 1 i r s i -� s _ « f 1 7" w t 17+ $....::.e../0. w: 90 $0.04 E 1 9 c I lM e c 1- '" m kol a i 6« 8' 1 i $,50 $k 5 .3 3�_� $0-17' .Y•( , : .1J r r r,. l " Y 8 +' e •�4 i � -..'.'',00 $191280. $ t 2. 21 T ri a ri +:r C r. i d ( 11:, T i t tt ,3 :� _ a 0;75 u. •+ M ,- 'y w i; wr Pr r w1'fi f , i I ? Y + .+ Y,+ r ,:r ' 1 1 .. 1,:,":',C. ,, ; t,1 k Y.,��, %,A: T'y,+.. t. i + r rw :f, :stil ( :ar ps j N1'."2, sf u.00 . $0 *0',00 r_ m , r a r ",t, i A i C i S 1 i t; ,. a r.. - +':., 3 r $1B.,:,1:0 ,.:. `; ra $0.C1' TRAMMEL CROW COMPANY / DAVID BLAKE INGF'IM /MILLO /MARTINDALE AR HITELT` L -,AU EiH CJJN; TRUL:TI ON COMPANY BUDGET •ECTIMATE file L- Cent er.A: wi,s AUGUST ltd ***No t o THIS EST I MATE REF L. Er: T S A rTORYY TOTAL *41CT F1'00r j,;It,,11;F feet f1. t,_, • • UNITH BLDG. • .COST/BLDG--SF ,)UANTIT'!' PRICE. TOTAL $0.c):3 .�1 $0 . td' 9 $t, t_d: Restroom Ti le Wet Nat 1 (9' ) Restro' :m Sidewa1 1 Tile Returns Paint concrete stair walls Faint interior- 'Wa I Is Paint stairsirai I s ICit�'r t or doors: Restroorn /Ut i I I ty Stairway doors 1140 sf 400 sf, i .lam 96:20 s ,4,686 s 1)) e 28 ea. 10 ea Subtotal $6.00 $0.300 $t d . 30 $200.00 $555.00 $600.00 SPE CIALTIES Toilet part itions w l ea :30 .tdt�1 TF' dispensers t:d.t'it: Paper towel dispenser, 10 t a $75.00 Napkin Disperser P,, e a $125,, 00. � r 00 a .1 .r .1 11`1. L.J. t1'. W �.... 1 r S Soap Disperser, 10 ea ,,t.tt Cit "3 '$75.00 1 blew 20 e.a Mirrors 4� f' 00 Fl r'e E; t i ntoui skier's 10 e:. $125.00 itriagt /Dir-ectori (AIlowanCe) 1 Is $4,009,00 Mai lboges (Allowance 1' Cs $1,500.00 tit UERTI!� :AL TkAMSPORTATION l ev'a s :lrs 2t0Oti , r" .t.' N Eleva;oe 0I:lb F{ r; sr► AI I owar,ce J 1"i r« 3tiaies and Rxj x 1 11 ! Subtotal 5 Sup , `l 3. 840 $1,800 $2,389 006 1 ^I y $0. 17 $0.07" $417,117 $4.57 $22 ; 670 $0.2i3 t 95 , O0tt $2.13 $15/000 t,d .16 M + "A ft TRAMMMELL CROW COMPANY / DAVID BLAKE INGRIN /MILL S/tTlt=ci`irINDAL.E ARCHITECTS B AUGH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY BUDGET ESTIMATE file L- CenterA.wi•.:s AUGUST 10, 1990 ** *Note THIS ESTIMATE REFLECTS A FIVE STORMY BUILDING 91630 SF TOTAL **1ST Floor 1:3' -4"** **12.67 feet floor to flocir** UNIT ,BLDG COST/BLDG SF QUANTITY PRICE TOTAL ( 1340 `SF) - y _ - Plumbing and HVAC� tpac age RTU's) 91360 sf $5.45 $497,912 $5.45 Fire Protection ELECTRICAL Power and l i oht i ng Fire Alarm 'WI Full Ionization 9126,0 sf Subtotal 91360 sf 1 Is Sub t o 11 a SUBTOTAL AREAS 1 THROUGH 1 JIJE,SI TE GEN'' L CONDITIONS PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT 880ND (NI(':,) SUBTOTAL OVERHEAD AND FEE @ :35 ;' LIABILITY INSURANCE TOTAL PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION :BUDGET $0.885 $(7,656 $2.65 $20 000.00 $e44,104'. $3,528,770 $141,1, a1 $St6697921 $120,44.7 + ∎=�_4 7i •' x.957 7 $6..:30 $0.22. 4W. 0 $38.62 $4 0' .17 0.29 $41.87 We expect this budget to be revised to reflect .t $40,00 /s.f. cost for the building construction. We are therefore) submitting out Site Development Review fee based on that calculation. 0. S t, c; LINCOLN, �� ' L„ M, ASS "a .. �± ?e�sti+► �► 4�w4» tanmaatsu�;+ wq�ar�eza�aamq�reNMi�grwu9��vrcwr�r ..u�rCaaai�n 4 d� rnr d +t;VT,1Fti :y, f�� i�h m w wuxaar+�ia�uat ;roe tLW Q vM2canglo Sea�w+hH�m�wob .»« ,.04.6..4114.6.0441.4.0.2.0 ww, o... , ryAtc redaairosuit ouvomp 1pyOnOto .R�l+1'I+s?n(ta+Oittegk r• ttti9l7xt41�ucF+bAA�K edlauarw + �aa+h vaM+uvA+c4HU+.umtfiionopwa4+r4Nn • . �a�HUraiilr�eu«naama`�a�suti+ru>�,tWg1ot ...141410 CHNItth Mal 00....??:!2L,m.' Cof,' Vi Sr t 4.4,1,4k; PMr t i� 44,41r, side I •,; L0 01il • '. M: W�ttht �t' f�pku� '+eNxu.pM,rmrah'MPWAi��ymak kY• v�, M, w+ uMiWn�b. µWwhMp�4Ws+ �awir, YrllMMf�ii�Y, tlti1�16�MFm�A ;4eNilN�teYafr,�j�iWj�iFY4 wxo i Alva',: . Ftri 2044 180°0 k«meds�i�sl.H.rSWN�+.�awkdaww t+t " $ ' fOr S `'t •kt ' �`. r �aaws�mr�a. er a.M for SLd *# " tatALS t3.41 141 or/ Use. 0 4,00 story wAr�rle x$ r www r+w+nawrwee.ya:w,. itot "io tiro X43,41 31701 tjoat � t ° : 't p rati s 0411 n;7 .,, a 4,11:,13 rot wdaaR+mwnyaais.pidroi, �4,rM�an.w• .�.v.�w».�a,.• ,P �xnawyoasain�urixayugripr #'.!Ira Id1 S 4.:1! 1 &o �a..vrw�wa.nni.rwu,hnd.� .�., Cad'» tt111i' to CAC bead aeji 26d f1 r forced ail` � � l ec tr �'3 + ' r , daNir�SOMwewwYaw Spat iat Fir* es v A rs aot Les Sys 0 r) r^r 1 N � -14,0229-A a ti •r � y � Ott d .� 4 ti 2 1- , ` �- , * requ rj to Abe r* fir ' ere,. .3070 ti a •e t ' u rLd to. 84,316,A and 334-A Mi of hi 8 ,� A,. U - . nn 11A h �. m, n Section 3303 -C EXCEPT W 4 b SAC A .a,.e�n.. %,•,._ ,.. ... Aurpsiin.ApwMVM�.' r ..�aw.a�wwr+.w.�nun...r.:m.iue _ wAwnipYwi and air cow i ion n ducts . ' ' e ed. . fire da Reference S „ ton c6, 4, ttt4. f e.- t . , . , e ' ■ , . 1 3 ' . 1 - 4' 4C4 OW 44 44 1441444444. 4,4444■ 144:4441.444 -F4%. 44,44:44'4 1390 ,\Uli \ o A p�ap06ag YGk�d 4� tlN�9E GN NW 1/4 NE V4 L. 3TION 35 T I S R, i W WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON SCALE 01.1001 I ;tO1k1R1$N1,00ifS.W f µ'MwY,L04,14,4twIM�W��.ti�tivMSo Wig+w�M•MwNM+rA4mobvNM.w�uMo o9m041 Vmw + Mw,w wd, „,...wNRVankvmw.wvrihwu+MUlnV/ N�L'{ il4 /WK1�,vMtvw�rvns »>hv.m.iAVe4.. n[m,, w ;ras 2 lc..75 ( r 5.10 •tl 60 ,OM •Q. • 05 , 69 °°"I 60 �0 �}la R6Q : 00 4 eC {tt9R I : %0� i 330.at IDStta � �' � loSZ�a.c;. I I KG7Ae. I I z.nd ac. 8:0111 I I (k. N +ate -9 1$ 4 3 2 I $I IS 4 3 2 I sl I$ 4 3 I 2 ' l Ill o I-1 81 �1 1� 5 �0 12 8I��i•1 18 5 12 8I�ILI I8 5 sl loo 8 5 Il.,t{ -d W.I '�” r (" j a f.l'! 18. G �I I I R I >', u Aa $1 E}'•0 s II -r8 �. I8 s II L ✓8I`�� /l I , g J I �', {z {b 4- ao `� !1} 4� p' + .�'- 13 ci s ! 'r �a {al fi . -li oU.r. --�• `4. i + ^v- '�io' loon 7 $i I8 7 5 9 10 $I I$ ;',,i,.0707.21AG. 10 g1 I7 9 7M--;° (ne,ot _, 8 I I 1 I I I ( Id zl; r1 I s Nib _'-4- a ? -,d ' i L a Q _!. eo .4 oc -L- e9 = -- ° b -4- eo j^4 E0 A ae eti eo 44 al I-a a`� i %' .: Rfr d{ °. $ VocAT[b.. c/a 7a -Ier _ VACAT[a R/0 00 -tat [ ) j("'. L _ -, 2,,:_a1._ q ry ; — - _ — rt.{t v . V{ 1 "tar 7- 83 Eb -4 4- 8b '4' db "4- db '1' Y T. 4 d3 "9' Sb 9" bd - P..E �� M w v--- " 1(1:3 =' .ft I I ( 1 u{ ° mmn m F I of I N {{ °al tl [ I I� { �n,69� 2 °fI �$ I$ 4' � 2 I $1 �I$ 3 µtea °4 {' i $I I$ � 3 2 I s1 � > I � I r' I ,: � 'i0tS4 � I � I 1/� � lol,ee + t- 44,,,;t.+_/,.44(,,, + `b 4 a + .b. .•k" I- - - -� `� S �!- �• 0 1�2 la �'�� 5 11- �1.. r j8 5 12 �I�� `t 5; 15 12 ql` 4 ` 11e114,60 w` 'IJ� Il'T.. _ 1 A.. ¢' 11. R Id Ill.io ;,.i2 _ Via° �, r "[ Y K��, T" 1Y 6 II $1 +4 "iR s II �IE+I i,�R ` "¢ 4.L._..2 � 44 , 16610 4. 4 al »,�� :IR It T I 6 I I I F qJ i 10 $11 gI8 7 lo 9IOt.t. I ,1/4607, . • to 21 ,t418 la 7 10 81 7 t,�; I� ,� � �. kg If)' "4' -¢ 4- ' - 41wi, 1- LEI AC,, �¢ ik4, 1- 1 8 !� 9 21 I8 8 ��,T�gg��-- 9 $1 (.h 18 9 L 9 41 (19as. 1 r8. 9.ee' $1 8 1 �YAc-I�0, 6' fifie,,�i I� 9 46#/� r.". 'Aix b° kVmfF �o''2�T 760 , 4 ...rtl K .,h' , --10 -. o, 111141 �iOhNlfii4i t�N4T "s la q,t} Kj�{ ��tt t4 y ° N io- t' t I I I iei �t 3300 — tos.aal6811 I$ 1 I I I .954c, A S 1 �1 FI ! 0 C) f ( I-' "r`e — to I Ira 11 ` r,1 8I { 1006 8 bl I 1 I I 100 I 1 gl Fi ryl� :l�� I i 10 r I I ,0° (I I (, a ff I Do, I I sw, tf I I's 44't 141,06 Y. 1 tlli { 9 6 ►� NA OAK 4- ' Bib -db WibrN) TO 3302 ?$AC,. 10 I LbI... '794 i.e . E11 1 I C i 1 I4 0 1 i I I list r 1g n "I nl "^ 1 i` O I( I I r l� � • I 1 I ' i i r II I I I � __.�. p x:31 H 1 �$ ',..4 i , _ -- •-• _ L i It j 1 I w SW, LOCUST -- -I STREET W . " !'_ „v:,- _..44.._.4...'+1 ._. j..- .10A.. .),. ..�.2u_ _.Dtail'_- - 7 `"!Ti i1',i J{IClria ,v.sXTa''I _ _ . f7�t • p s+ol -92o - w " � 3:,64 oo■ W.o7 100r - -= - -100 - - .1' =ti �r "'L.- Tore- 1 85 0 i I +o I fir" N\ I I I \ i` 7�, iioc GNetLLeo `..I « NI I" �� Al ^�i b"I' I p :n: Yt00 sl 1•R i 41.401 � t,1.14 .' j 100 b �`�\ � io °o I I it •495 o -'•.— _. ` • . . `• Soo 101 E I X _w ' °I ► I _�; 'Z' ^+v Ii ici • .°A AC. o = ^I ^I la 28 291 j�N II d! iWao.r s , I 4 B2 _ �� _IQp t llot�i _ =` a ., I I +� 0 ct d ra 1118 I / 300 01 ag / 17 0 t°00 Ism . I a / toot . .tot 14 25 26 1 2 i leoo _ `t � ys �. lion i o0 tt/ M11i.dt'1Y t11Y�• • °j' a+ 0/ / / " I MI. ///ii X: Ijd-� _ fti•i ti_ _ atea. _ / / ° I i:• _ / // �u 4J — 1 t t lrA 9 / >x I'f'4+i0 /' ft . ii{. / ! Lit 1 /IL coo M1 it PURPOSES ONLYNT DO NOT RELY 01,1 FOR ANY OTHER USE, 0 54 e,llu0911 Till _. 00. ,•9'•e.. ,•9'i•; o 71V 8 N ry : „. ,p N cuee.- ID -f. • 44,l1.90 c P 6M 01� i Nei coat a'1 001•• 114.1 ,POI l ( w Y 1 .11.11 ,ua'•o •ove r d�-- - -041” pjy rai, "�rq �� _ N;•o'• •_,mil l� 1 141 07 d 1if 00' e,llu0911 Till _. 00. ,•9'•e.. ,•9'i•; o 71V 8 N ry : „. ,p N cuee.- ID -f. • 44,l1.90 c P 6M 01� i Nei coat a'1 001•• 114.1 ,POI l ( w Y 1 .11.11 ,ua'•o •ove r d�-- - -041” pjy rai, "�rq �� _ N;•o'• •_,mil l� 1 141 07 d 1if 00' UN T O oh! Mbw i4.'A lµ f . M °I YIiIN {N11M/MNNS sfW „d.k,uwiwrf,Nrlu » r.,» M4MM�iHiW4ti4NMwfA91M1A :'H>~ +11Ni'40 . �khYPMy.,.rIM41NN INKa?N 1,! 4 t. 41 4111 "„ VAR50.iY. EC.3‹ MMOUN' ' . n of ., PA ym1w 1\r r D 'i E . 1 P ' 27 / 9 o t.o4 , IrNW4iwNli,,f 'OT rL AMOUNT P REQUEST FCMM COMMENTS TO:�! ! __ _ DATE: October 16 1990 FFROM: Ti • Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDP 90.0022 VARIANCE VAR. 90 0033 LINCOLN EIGHT (NPO #8) request for Site Development Review approval to allow EIGHT $ A re est construction of a seven story, 140,000 square foot office building, and a three level parking garage. Also requested is a Variance approval to allow for increased building height to approximately 90 feet whereas the Community p nt Code - 'allows a maximum building height of 45 feet, and a reducti n� in the sizel of parking stalls ZONE: C-P (Commercial LOCATION: 10250 F 9 Profe� „s�ional) r OCA SW Greenburg Road (WCTM 1S1 35AB, tax lob 1000) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's j Statement for your review. From information supplied by, various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future If you wish to. comment on this application, we need your comments by Oct. 26, 1990. You may use , the space provided, below or attach a separate letter tau your comments. If you are unable to respond _ by the ' above date please return taur Commences phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, Contact the Tigard Planning Department, _PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE 639- 4171. STAFF, CONTACT: Keith Liden PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it- Please contact of our of nice, Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Name of Person Comntent.ing: Phone Numbers bkm /SD1190 -22 . BEM o NO_ "!.;CATION LIST NPO NCB. CITY DEPARTMENTS _(2: copies) ..,::I3uilding,._,Inspeotor /Brad R City,v..,Recorder Engineering /Gary ) A. SPECIAL DISTRICTS ir °Fire District (pick - -up box bldg.) Tigard Water District 8777 SW. Burnham St. Tigard, OR 97223 Metzger Water District 6501 SW Taylors Ferry Rd.; Tigard, OR ' 97223 AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS Wash. Co.: Land Use a Transp.e 150 No First Ave. Hillsboro, OR 97124 Brent Cu'etis Kevin ,tart i n ' Joann Rice Scott Ring Fred Eberle Mike Borreson Tim Bendryx'' City of Beaverton PO Box 4755 Beaverton, CR 97076 __ State Highway D3.vision'l Lee Gunderson PO Box 565 Beaverton, OR 97075 ORaALL APPLICATIL CPO NO Parks & Recreation Board Police n.. Other P1/1 '640- , r ".! A) l School Dist. No. 48 (Beavr) Joy Pahl PO Box 200 Beaverton, OR 97075, School District 23J (Tig) 13137 SW Pacific Hwy. Tigard, OR 97223 Boundary Commission ^ 320 SW Stark Room_ 530 Hillsboro, OR 97124 METRO 2000 SW 1st Ave. Portland, OR 97201-5398 DLCD (CPA" only) 117 5 Court St. NE Salem, OR 97310 -0590 other c tr=t. 6 . }vim & it . i . L . • .d • s ti . d 4 . • w d d . . 4 4 d 14 4 a . .'r d . J . • • • • • o • o SPECIAL AGENCIES __..j/'''General Telephone Mike Lutz 12460 SW Na'in St. 4aVerton, OR 97007 WW 'Natural Gaffs Ronald D, Pol'vi, PE, PLS 220 "yam Second Ave. Portland, OR 97209 ,0^'" Portland General Electric Brian Moore 14655 SW Old Seholis Ferry Beaverton, Be OR 97007 Metro Area Communications Harlan Cook Twin Oaks Technology Center 1815 NW 169th Place 5 -6020 Beaverton, OR 51006 ,-4886 US West Pete Nelson 421 SW Oak St, Portland, OR 1 97204 TCI Cablevision of Oregon, Inc., Mike Hailock 3500 SW Bond' Portland, OR 97201 • 4� • a e w a a a• a•• a o a• a o o� Wit►. 981.06 TrARD Sox 23397 )regon 97223 yy ��+ayy `t�oo /��y ni.a7. 2GD 000 o .fi o w tl m 0.11 .w m i w a' it i►'kNrM D 2 1.7 QUEBEC **iG�rE�,� ORrt'"9740i 000 tj LV g M _ August 20, 1992 Kurt VanVolkenburg, Agent for SF Oregon Co., Ltd. Lincoln Center, Suite 345 10220 SW Greenburg Road Tigard, OR 97223 : Application for Extension of Approval Lincoln VI1i/x 1 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON near: Mr. VanVo lken%urg e Thank you for your letter of July 30, 1992, requesti.ng an extension of pp p y eve].opment review approval of the the approval period for the site d proposed new office building � • "'enter complex, (, SDR 90- �i�.din at the Lincoln u :� a � r , 0022/VAR 90 -0033, Lincoln VIII /X) applied fog. the extension before the ecp3ration date of August 4, 1992. will not grant the extension outright. your letter of .July 30 did not respond adequately to some of the matters that I mentioned in my you July 10, p ally, I said that we would letter to rau bf �'ul , l0 1992. 5 e.cific l some party assumes the obligations not grant an extens �.on until � : g . outlined in the three-party agreement between Lincoln Eight Limited Partnership, Win mar and the city, dated March s, ` 1991. If SF Oregon Co., Ltd. is the owner of Lincoln Center, and the assignee of SEIYU International Corporation's development rights for Lincoln VIII/X, xp Oregon Co-, Ltd. to assume those Y ur letter specifically did not assume any of those obligations. " , s extremely vague about the reasonable expectation that construction of the office btiilding would be initiated within the extension period. One of the requirements of the Code is tha t the applicant show interst of initiating coastr uction on the site within the one year eXtension period (Chapter � ) . 1 'would interpret your letter as saying that . 18.120.040.C.2, ,; � , _ .. � t , there �? P osea office building is little chance that the construction of the ro would actually be initiated. Finally there have been changes in the applicable poiicies and O, :provisions i _.. :. � bay- e t fee, changes rdinande on which the approval wa ► based, Among these are p of a county-Vide transportation impr'ov�ed n changes in the adoption , s �.andsca �n lout ual:it f�czZ�.t standard , g y ;p ng% ffering Standar.s', 131 5 SW Ha l BIvd P Kok 2 397. Tigo�d, re on (02.4 (503) x,39 -4171 in1..MMdM. .tLL'4 .ra::.W:ul9M Kurt VanVolkenburg SF Oregon Co. Ltd. August 20, 1992 Page 2 In my opinion, there is sufficient' basis to deny the request for an extension„ However, because the City hash d the office building site plan, would like to see the office building eventually built, and because an changes polices or standards would not result in y than es in standards •n significant changes to the-site plan, I will grant an extension under the following conditions: That SF Oregon Co- , Ltd. agrees in writing to participate in the proposed area-wide traffic study in the amount of $10,000, thereby fulfilling Paragraph E of the three- party agreement • That. the development � either '' P f Lincoln VIII: will be subject to the Transportation Improvement Feeer; (TIP) regulations that. are in effect the date of this letter, or the amount agreed to in Paragraph A of that sane three -party agreement. The developer of the office building may choose which fee to pay, but one or the other must be paid. This letter grants an extension until August 4, 1993, . sub j subject to the above conditions. Failure to meet the above conditions will mean that this extension is null and void, and any proposed office building would then have to reapply for site development review and meet the standards that are in effect at the time of that application I trust that this letter is clear. ear r ' If you do have any questions or comments, please contact me immediately. Sinrefre1y, Es wEi d J. M by Counity De elopment Director /sFLtd. t tr c. Jack Robinson, City Attorney • a ro Reardon, Winutar o John Carter, Melvin. marks Properties c� D avid Blake, Signature Properties 1 July 10, 1992 Dad' "icy. Blake 10220' Greenburg Road, Suite 135 Tigard, OR 97223 CI1Y of TIGAD OREGON As I assume you know, after the development plan for Lincoln ght (now apparently called Lincoln 10) was approved, it was appealed by Jack Reardon on behalf of Winmar. The appeal was later dropped after a three -way agreement was reached between ` David Bake,, representing Trammel Crow 's "Lincoln Eight Limited Partnership; Jack Reardon, representing Winmar, and Pat Reilly, representing the City of Tigard. Since the agreement was signed, building plans were submitted (but never r eviewed) , and building related fees were deposited with the City. Meanwhile, several property transact, ions have taken place, resulting in Lincoln Eight Limited Partnership no longer owning the land, or apparently the right to build the building. In the agreement, there was a commitment to participate in a traffic study and to commit funds future transportation related capital e capital improvements. � of t h e fund ing for the traffic study is already committed with the exception of any commitment from the Lincoln Center. Meanwhile, the land-use approval for Lincoln Eight expires on August 4, 1992, and the City still retains the building fees. The City's position regarding this matter is as follows: 1. The City of Tigard will continue to pursue! both, the traffic p study funding and the capital improvement funding from Lincoln Eigh% Limited partnership, which:, is liable for its obligation to participate as per the agreement. If necessary, the City may look towards the land owner and /or permit holder to fulfill these obligations. The City Tigard t of Ti and will not grant an extension to the site 2a development approval until and, unless it is made clear to the City who has the right to be the permit holder, and fit who�i'is assuming the obligation outlined in the three-party g . s . g ligated g a ree3ment if Lineol.n Eight believes it is no longer obligated. Should anyone ask that the building permit fees be reimbursed, the city will not release these building fees already pair unless and Until it is made clear to the City who has the right to be reimbursed those fees. 13125 SW Halt Blvd,, P4OI Bost 23397, Tigard, Orsgon 97223 (503) 534 - 4171 ---- n .-M Letter to John Carter, Melvin Mark Properties Page 2 July 10, 192 hope this letter clarifies the City's position am hopeful.. that this situation can be resolved amicably- If you have any questions hesitate uestions or comments, please do not he.�tate tcs call me. Sincerely, Ed Murphy Community Development Director br/Lincoto.Ltr c: Pat Reilly, City Administrator c: Mike Robinson, City Attorney c: Jack Reardon, Winmar c: Kurt VanVo lkenburgh o: John Carter- %Melvin Mark Properties r• May 28, 1991 Mr. John A. Stirek Trammel Crow Company 10260 SW Greenburg Rd Tigard, Or 97223 ij il. �4� yy* ryyA,;:i V CITY of TIGARD OREGON Re:! Lincoln Eight Appeal Resolution Agreement Dear. Mr. <'Stirekz In the near future, you may be ready to start construction of the Lincoln Eight Office building, and therefore will want to obtain your building permite. To avoid any misunderstanding or delay at that time, 1 wish to explain which fees are to be paid, and which credits are to be given. Section A states "That LELP shall pay in lieu of all other development fees to Tigard an amount equal to $205,264 less any application and permitting fees already paid in connection with File Number SDR 90 -0022 /VAR 90 -0033 (hereinafter "the project") which offset shall not exceed $15,000...". It is "shall pay in lieu of all other development fees--.'" ' understanding that means my lieu of any traffic impact fee (TIF) , or street development 'charge (SDC) ; and "less any other application and permitting fees already paid..." means site development review, and building plan review fees. Thia means that $205,264 will be paid, less $15.000, for a total of $190,264.00. The plan review fee of $14,629.65, and the SDR Application fee of $980 have already been. paid. Since the agreement says an "amount tat to exceed $15,000... ", only $15,000 will be deducted from the $205,264. The $190,264 will be due and payable prior to any final ro occupancy approval. and P Road as identified an account " dedicated the agreement, p burg shall be placed in a dedicated for traffic is on SW, Preen burg ent. in section R of th p p Paid buildin including: = issuance Q g p All other permit and develo meat fees will need to be aa.d prior to Lss Building, Plumbing, Mechanical and Sitework permits • Storm drainage development Water quality development Sanitary sewer connection Street opening permit If you have any questions, please call me a 639- 4171. e ly Murphy 'Community Deve opment Director cc a Tim Ramis, City Attorney grad Eoart, Building Official Randy ,WooLey, City Engineer Don Eckman, Attorney Wayne Lowery, Finance Director BCR /Liricloxi6 1312 SW Hdl Ivd t PLO t o 397 Tlgc r it c re C h Q72 r (503) 639 -4171 4. AGREEMENT between Lincoln Eight Limited Partnership (here#nafter• "LELP ") , Wl nmar pacific. Inc., a Washington corporation, including the operating companies es Washington Square Inc. , 3 Washington corporation and Fringe Land ORE. Ltd. an Oregon Limited Vartnership (hereinafter collectively "WCI ") and The City of Tigard (hereinafter "Tigard ") RECITALS' 1. LELP has received ' approval by the Director of its Site Development Review File Number SDR 50- 0022 /VA.R 90- 0033. 2. NCI has appealed the Director's decision for traffic impact` reasons. 3. The ` parties met on February 25, 1991 and came to an agr=eement which would address the interest of all parties. AGREEMEN ., ,, The Parties do hereby agree as f011 ows A. That LELP shall pay i n, lieu of all other development fees to Tigard an' amount equal to $205,264.00 less any a licatIo �.t c n and permitting ti. . C fees already paid n connection with' fi'1 a Mu(,ber�pSGR 90-0022/VAR 5.0 -0033 (hereinafter "the project ") which offset stall not exceed $15,000.00. These funds shall be due and payable prior to receiVingoccuparrcy 'permit en the office structure approved under the Project. B. The funds in "A "a above shall be paid to the city and will be set aside in a se arate fund 'account,; to be used solely as a contribution to the traffic mitigation on Greenburg Road and at the Greenb.ur IRi.. hway 217 interchange in conjunction with like funds contributed 1 ---Pi l 3 i n c 1 ttd - .V'the mitigation at Greenburg Road or its connecting system). �i � accrued' d the funds' pa paid under °A" above shall also be applied to the mitigation � e tr projects. C. The City is � accep ti ng the funds referenced above as a contribution towards i- tra.fic improvements in the area, and will consider these funds unds to i,c1u ap� streets System Development Char othCrWI ae be due on the project. � f wi 1 l dedicate the he fu nds , legs y any application and Permitting fees al rea dy pai d as referenced I n parag rap A . to traffic Mitigation ProJects as referenced i n paragraph B . The city i s to dedicate these funds to a specific Project oe area because these funds exceed the normal System aevelopsetlt costs and are Provided ded for the . # - i t� ati n the hung � :specific- purpose of m� .g g traffic problems J I n the area, The City is not establishing a precedent, rega di rng the a i ca t �Aon of City Transportation t Ft es �.r 1, tnianf��npra�erren. Fees or System Development Charges that noul d a h � C � pp .� to +} fete , devel v0Meh is proposed by WC1 or LELP • t'1 03/O1/51 5O WP1,04 .4, MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Pat Reilly, Wayne Lowry, Randy Wooley, Brad Roast and Jerry Offer FROM: Ed Murph DATE: March 20, 1991 SUBJECT: Lincoln VIII Appeal Resolution Attached please find a copy of the agreement between Trammel -Crow, Winmar and the City. Please review it carefully. Since it was done through mediation, and in a time crunch, it may not be perfectly clear, and it may not have covered all the issues- In essence, this is what I believe the agreement says: permit for Lincoln V'il �. ,, Prior to issuance of the occupancy p $ r Trammel-Crow will pay to the City $205,264 (less any fees already paid, up to $15,000). 2p will keep these separate account (not the We wall kee �.hese funds in a se a.�ate ag $205,264, but about $190,000), accruing interest that will stay in the account. These funds will only be Used as a contribution to the traffic mitigation on Creenburg Road in conjunction with "like funds". Note the source for the "like funds1e is not specified.. o it is expected to bfb,, a combination of WCI , ODOT, Washington County and others 3. The city will not collect the Streets SDC's that would have otherwise been due. This building is not subject to the TIF because the plans had been submitted prior to the effective date of TIF. • All other conditions of approval apply, including required traffic improvements 5 ▪ Trammed - -Craw will contribute up to $50 000 to a traffic shady'. + y '�, study +" not in the we have to �.ha.taa � e the traffic study. �lah.c�u h � �. is n agreement, 1 told t,h.em we coulc]. initiate the � tudy within 60 days, s "initiate" oa the p r'obalble participant s , with �nt�a.te meaning to c.onta+�t t organize a work session of those participants, and have drafted a soope of wore. As I mentioned, many of the details of this agree ent' are not spelled out. So, again, 1 would appreciate your close reading of this agreement, and your q 4C. '4 tioY and cone ents o ► i by 3/29, . -.i I AR PACIRC, , INC , 9585 S M. WASHINGTON SQUARE ROAD i• PORTLAND,'©REGON 97223 -- TELEPHONE (503) 6398860 Ed Murphy; Director of Planning City of Tigard P. 0. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Ed: Please find enclosed one fully - executed copy of the agreement between Lincoln Eight Limited Partnership, City of Tigard regarding the fund& contributed by Lincoln Eight Limited Partnership f fornfutu e traffic mitigation on Greenburg Road and at the Greenberg/ � � g, Hwy. 217 interchange. I look forward to hearing from you soon in regard to the formulation of a group to address the traffic concerns of the area. Our traffic study should be completed very soon, and we can use it as the basis to begin our evaluation and move forward to formulate plans for improving the transportation system in the study area. If I can be of any help, please let me know. Thank you very much for your help eration and p p in getting this agreement finalized. Sincerely, ck F. Reardon, C m /cm Vice President and General Manager S1 AGREEMENT . bets eer► Lincoln Eight Limited Partnership (here; naf ter "LELP "), Winmar Pacific, Inc., a Washington corporation, Including, the operatirn9 companies Washington Square, Inc., a Washirrgto; corporation and Fringe Land ORE. Ltd., an Lre gos Limited part nership (hereinafter collectively "NCI ") and The City of Tigard (hereinafter "Tigard "). RECITALS 1. LELP has received approval by the Director of its Site Development Review File Number SDP. 90- 0022 /VAR 90 -0033. � "sons , WCI ha "appealed the Director s decision for traffic c 3. The parties met org February 26, 1991 and came to an which would address the interest of all Parties A G R E E M E N T agreement The parties do hereby agree as follows: p y other development' fees to A. Thrtt LELP shall a i n lieu �v of a1 Tigard an amount equal to. $2O5 , 264.00 less any application and permitting fees already paid in connection with File NUrrber SOR 90M 0022 /VAR 90 -0033 (hereinafter "the project ") which offset shall not exceed $1 5,000.00. These funds shall be due and payable prior to receiving octuparcy permit on the office structure approved under the project. B. The funds in °'A" above shall be paid tc the 'City and will be set aside in a separate fund account, to be used solely as a contribution to the traffic mi ti}aation on 'Greenburg Road and at the Greenberg /;4ighway 217 rote change in conjunction with like funds contributed .i— --=s -- - mere ;`-- -`'-, CI d--- r..d -- • -''`tfi� ri ti gati on at Greerthurg Road or 1 ±s connectting system). Any interest accrued on the funds' paid under "A" above shall also be apps f ed to the to of i c mitigation projects' C• 1 g d above as a The City i 5 ac�:ept1 n the funds �`ef'e�et%Ce contribution towards traffic Improvements in the area, and will ccns1 de►- these funds to include any streets System Development Charges that would otherwise be due on the project. The City will dedicate' the funds, less any application and y permitting fees already paid as referenced in paragraph A, to traffic mi ti gati or, projects as referenced i n para jraphh 8. The City is willing to dedicate these funds to a specific ►roject or area because these funds exceed the normal system Development costs and are being provided for the specific pu1'pose of mitigating the traffic problems the v fy The City �i is not establishing shi ng a precedent regardi ng. the {e � � Y eM � application of City TransPortation Irmpraverent Fees or Systel Det/e1op ient Charges that would apply to any future . development proposed by WC' or 03/01/91 5051.1PPb D. As a condition of the current Land Use ~Application the project shall not be required to pay for any other mitigation on Greenburg Road or its connecting system other than those already imposed as a condition of approval as listed in the above-referenced file number. It is understood that this agreement cannot exempt the project from any future local improvement di stri+ ts. E. LELP shall contribute up to $50,006.00 to a traffic study to be conducted as .a joint endeavor by Washington County. Tigard, the City of Oregon Department of Transportation and WCI. It is understood that Tigard shall request equal contribution from each party to the traffic study. In the event any of the funds referenced above .are remaining upon completion of the study, these funds shall be used by Tigard for the traffic mitigation on Greenburg Road or its connecting system. E. , NCI shall contribute its traffic study report in Complete detail to the joint traffic study referenced in "D' above, The cost of WCI 's traffic study shall be credited towards its corntri bution to the joint traffic study. G. WCI shall withdraw completely its appeal on the project by 4 :00 p.m. on Friday, March 7, 1991, and further agrees not to appeal anything else in connection" With the project through the completion of the proect s buildings; H. LEL? agrees not to appeal any future applications or processes' in connection with those applications in the Washington Square develoPment that are subtniteed by WCI or its affiliates Agreed and entered into this .. . of _ ��r!.u.ar:.7y y 1991. . LINCOLN EIGHT LIMITED' PARTNERSHIP By: -3.,.,.,��.....�.�.d.._: Its President 3y` Its. Vice President CITY OF TIGARD By: David I l ake, Vice-President Crow Oregon; Inc., General Partner fl ii CTY AF TIGARD OREGON March 6, 1991 David Blake, General Partner Lincoln E'..ght Limited Partnership' 10250 SW Greenburg Road Suite 300 Portland,' OR 97223 SDR 90 -0022 /VAR 90 --0033 Dear Mr. Blake: You recently received approval for Site development Review SDR 90 -0022 and variance. VAR 90:0033. This letter is to remind you that certain conditions of approval must be satisfied prior to the issuance of a site work, permit, ,prior to the issuance of ` a building permit, prior to the construction of the proposed office building and parking lot, and prior to the issuance of an occupancy Permit. x will be happy to help you with the process of meeting these conditions and would like to start right now by recommending that you read the Notice of page # heading. y the Conditions of Approval p beginning on Lecis�.on for SDR 90 -�D022 Particularly th cond�.tionalo for more please ��eferlows,r� is a iarief descry. ta,an of those conditions, to the original decision. Prior to obtaining a site work or grading permit: 1. Submit plans for sani ' 13. Submit plans showing the before and after amount of impervious surface; 14. Submit approved building plans to Engineering Department; 15. Provide adequate visitor parking during constructions 16. Provide a copy of the Indirect Source from the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. During construction of the proposed office building and packing structures Prior 17. No materials will be stored on public streets and debris will be screened from view of public streets; 18. No construction work may take place after 9 p.m. orybefbre T a.m. ys, 8 a.m. Saturday, And d 9 a.m. SunCay; .,,. 19. All construction materials must be stored on -site; 20. Protective fencing must be installed; 21. Limits the activities of construction vehicles. to obtaining an occupancy permit: 22. All site improvements and landscaping must be complete financially secured; 23. Sign permits must be obtained prior to erecting any signs; 24. G.reenburg Road, Locust Street, And Mapleleaf Drive improvements must be approved by the City and the County. 25. Whew! answer any questions or if I can assist you in satisfying these please contact me at 639 -4171 ext. 390, Sincerely, January 2, 1996 City' of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Heliport at Lincoln Tower Dear Sir or Madam: Enclosed for your records is a copy of the flight logs for the period June 1 through December 31, 1995. We are in all respects in compliance with the operational requirements for the heliport- If you require further in formati on Please advise, Very truly yours, Robert 4 Riecke Vice esident-- administration and General CounSe PJR: skt Enclosure c: Brad Knodell/Melvin Mark. Lincoln Tower 10260 S.W. Greenburg Road Suite 900 Portland, OR 97223 (503) 246 -3440 lPost Office Box 5805 Portland, OR 97228 -5805 Si4T»It ctustrfes,. 10260 SW Greenburg Road Suite 900 Rortifand, Oregon 97223 (503) 246 -3440 Flight Operation Log For Period t Page Departure Time Destination User Name & Address (if other than W`£D) G/, WTD Industries,, Inc:.. 10260 SW Greenberg Ra Suite 900 Portland, Oregon 97223 (503) 246-3440 Flight Operation Log For Period . i Page ( of Bell 206 Bit (unless otherwise Landing Time Origin of Might Departure Time Destination User Name & Address (if other than WTI) 10260 SW Greenburg Road Suite 900 For t'criod 47( Portland,- Oregon. 97223 (503) 246-3440 ; Page of Bell 206 BII(unless otherwise noted) Pate Landing Time Origin of Flight Departure `Kline Destination User Name & Address (if other than W `P) Purpose of Flight �F J j , ,--- i -7( - r111111111.1112=1111,1 Pate Landing Time Origin of Flight Departure `Kline Destination User Name & Address (if other than W `P) Purpose of Flight �F J j , W'I'D Industries, Inc. 1026G SW Greenburg Bond Suite 900 Portland, Oregon 9- 7223 (503) 246-3440 Date Landing; Time 3 T_7 Origin of Flight Departure Tie Destination 2-0 ftAl Flight Operation Log For Period fa -Wage of Bell 206 B1I (unless otherwise Hated) User Name & Address ' (if other than WTD) Purpose of flight 1 44-5- 4 4 • WTD Industries, Inc. 10260 SW Grcenburg Road Suite 900 Portland, Oregon 97223 (503) 246-3440 Flight Operation Log For Period /0 _ t to Page Bell 206 BII (ui less otherwise noted) Date Landing Time Origin. of Flight Departure Time Destination. User Name & Address (if other than WTD) Purpose of Flight j% P W133 _Industries stc. 10260 SW Grcenburg Road Suite 900 Portland, Oregon 97223 (503} 246-344� 0: Br Aft Origin of Flight Departure Time Destination User Name & Address T other than WTD) Purpose of Flight Flight Operation Log For Period // 0 Page of _ Bell 206 1111(unless otherwise noted) DECENMBER= - NO FLIGHTS i M H. 03/01/91 11: 33 °8'503 4 7297 CITY OF T I GARp Ia o01 TRANSMISSION OK TRANSACTION it 9688 CONNECTION TEL 2432944 C'ONNECTI'ON I D !; i ty Attorney TART TIME 03/01 11:30 USAGE T l ME 02' 22 PAGES 3 Past4t" brand Fax Transmittal Memo lib' Company Lgcollon tiX t Connote 7672, ; -Z��z k of Pegos 'earth , �.... '?Time — TolophOtlb d (Locatlo °8X bole c 7 / C66c '''br(pinal Dootroy H oturn Q Call lot pickup Dlupoaltlont �..— Atttarh rinrtimanf At' i: ir,s■ FEA ES '91 14139 FOSTER RUT ER 14 I aa4, 3 /o1/61.1 (L!3c 00 41.- 44""vOlvL5 44444441A,66, e'tf- tit .e. L , t, dx 4Y ��tlZrAt' 4 i AGREEMENT between Lincol Eight Limited Partnership (hereinafter 14, 100), W4tm *-4 =- (hereinafter ttWCI') and The City of Tigard thereinafter "Tigard "). RECXTALS 1, LELP has received approval by the Director of its Site Development Review File Number SOR 90 -0022 /VAR 91 -0033. 2, WCI has appealed the Director's decision for traffic impact reasons, 3. The parties met on February 26, 1991 and came to an agretatnent which would address the interest of all parties. AGREEMENT The parties do hereby agree as Follows; 5' c A, That LELP shall pay in lieu of all other development; fees to Tigard an amount equal to $ .wa.98, less any application and permitting fees already paid' to connection with File Number SOR 90 -0022 /VAR 90- 0033 hereinafter "the project ") which offset shall not exceed $15,000,00. These funds shall be due and payable only upon completion of the structures approved Under th., pro,ect B. The funds 10 ''A" above shall be aid into escrow with specific instructions to be agreed upon by the parties, contribution shalt only permit the Use of said funds by Tigard solely eas Instructions shall to the traffic mitigation on areenburg Read and at the Greenbtirg /Highway 217 interchange in conjunction with like funds contributed by WCI (said 11'e funds contributed by WCI shall include an TIF or LID payments paid by WCI a--r-. All funds pail, Under ''A'I above and hold in escrow shall 4e6-0 -t , e--be 1,t t of L 1-- h -uf s-- --u4.e d--by4 1.-gaf � � '11, 1 a ccru.Rd 6"" Pict( . --044 r had project shall not be required to pay for any other rg Road or its connectin• system s - err mitigation on �P��'oh U �„ w - ...art rrr� ••• .1*, --- eG-.'1r`« 1 t -4I -- if , td G •-r . •,tea 1 • -0 i`' 'ts - {.latt. rwi Q Loa i d 01 al? t�'t t+ j D. L LP shall contribute up to 5O,000,00 to a trafl is tudy to be conducted as a 6oi nt endeavor by Washington county, Tigard, the city of twit)rµton and WC y Study, be used by Tare rer ailhing 2qu y1�3 --t �fie—� in the event sny. of the fund8 upon Comp tion of the stud these funds shall Tigard for the traffic m'it1gation on G•eenburg Road or its connecting system, tkkm:\Y-4r4 r1j 1,1f„, - i;J nos H t 1 +N x s9ad 1 March` 1, 19 9 _ .10:3 0 am. Under paragraph A, last sentence should read "these funds shall be due and payable prior to receiving an occupancy permit on the office structure approved under the project” Under paragraph B. the last sentence should be replaced with the following: 1PAny interest accrued on the funds paid under "A °° above and held in escrow shall remain in the escrow account and shall be applied to the traffic mitigation projects. Add a new paragraph as follows: The City is accepting the funds reference above as a contribution towards traffic improvements in the area, and will consider these funds to include any streets System Development Charges that would otherwise be due on the project. The City will dedicate the funds, less any application and permitting fees already paid as referenced in. paragraph A, to traffic mitigation projects as referenced in paragraph B. The City is willing to dedicate these funds to a specific project or area because of the special circumstances surrounding case and because the majority of the funds are being voluntarily contributed by LELP. to sa a Paragraph C. should rewritten y g p ld be rPCari t The project whall not ` be required to pay for any other ' �rg Road or its connecting system other than mitigation on Crc ��nbL� pp those already imposed as a condition of a roval as listed in the above referenced file number. Paragraph D. Add the Oregon Department of Transportation to the first. seLtenoe . Delete the second sentence. (ear, t�U .y«waiiar FEB • it, Pi • E9 '91 14;39 FOSTER PEPPZR P,3/3 E. W�� shall contribute its ,� .raffic study report in complete detail � to the Joint traffic study r+ foren ed in "f" above, The cost of I' s traffic study shall be credited t ►wards its contribution to the loi nt traffic study. F1 MCI shall withdraw completely its appeal on the roJect b 3:00 p,m, on Friday March 1 , 1591, end further agrees not pto ap0ca1 LEL,P agrees not to appeal any � y f'utur °e applications or processes r in connection with those applications in the Washington Square development that are submitted by $4CI or i t$ affiliates. H, ELP's ,4 reemGnt to ;err under thf. 5 Agr ment is furl et condition by a absen a of any ; pp al that t,, be it ed by n, r -e n conr� with he r 1 d $ ch an rei L she not oM aged or m.� Agreed and entered into 'this day of February 1991, WINMAR COMPANY, INC. LINCOLN EIGHT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ay CITY OF TIGARD Bid 0 /ts/01 g6.5W 'Ppat ' Sy: David Blame, Vice - President Crow Oregon, Tn ,, General Partner 27c ELP t.toact rximexle opt w41 S14441 Ee✓.fz.. 74aa olP i i'f,, `at t. e — • WNMAR P CIFIC, INC. 9585 S.W. WASHINGTON S 97223 -� TELEPHONE (503) 639 -8860 SQUARE ROAD • PORTLAND, OREGON 97 March 1, 1991 Time: 4 :00 p.m. Ed Murphy Planning Director City of Tigard 13125 S. W. Hall P. O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Mr. Murphy: We hereby withdraw our appeal on the Lincoln Eight project 'Tigard City File ##SDR90 -0022/ VAR90 0033 Since ely, ack F. Reardo3i, CSM /CMD Vice President JITR:crw A SAPECO COMPANY • -4. w March 1, 1991....10030 am Under paragraph A, last sentence should read "these funds shall be due and payable prior to receiving an occupancy permit on the office structure approved under the =pro ' 7 ect" Paragraph B should be rewritten to state the following: The funds in "A" above shall be paid to the City and will be set aside in a separate fund account, to be used solely as a contribution to the traffic mitigation on Greenburg Road and at the Greenburg/Highway 217 interchange in conjunction with like funds contributed by WCI. Any interest accrued on the funds paid under 0°A', above shall also be applied to the traffic mitigation projects Add a new paragraph as follows: The City is accepting the funds reference above as a contribution towards traffic improvements in the area, and will consider these funds to include any streets System Development Charges that would otherwise be due on the project. The City will dedicate ro�' ect. will the funds, less any application and permitting fees already paid as referenced in paragraph A, to traffic mitigation Projects as referenced in paragraph B. The City is willing to dedicate these funds to a specific project or area because these funds exceed the normal System Development Charges and are being provided for the specific purpose of mitigating traffic cnt impacts in the area. The City is not establishing a precedent regarding the application of City Transportation Improvement Fees or System Development Charges that would apply to any future developments proposed by WCI or LELPa Paragraph C. should be rewritten to Say: As a condition of the current land use application, the project shall not be required to pay for any other p mitigation on Greenburg connecting system other than in already imposed r as Road oy a or of approval as listed in the above It is understood that this agreement file number. t cannot exempt the project from any Local Improvement Districts that may be created in the future. . Paragraph D. Add the Oregon, Department 'of Transportation to the first sentence. Delete the second sentence. 0 4+� AGREEMENT between Lincoln Eight Limited Partnership there; naf ter "LELP "), Wlnmar Pacific Inc., a Washington corporation, including the operating companies Washington Square, Inc. a Washington corporation and Fringe Land ORE. Ltd., an Oregon Limited Partnership thereinafter collectively "WCI ") and The City of Tigard (hereinafter "Tigard°'). RECITALS 1. LELP has received approval by the Director ' its Site Development Review File Number SDR 50- 0022 /VAR 90-0033. 2. WCI has appealed the Director's decision for traffic impact reason. 3. The parties net o;'r February 26, 1991 and came to an agreement which.Would address the interest of all parties. AGREEMENT The parties do hereby agree as follows; A. That LELP hall pay in lieu o f l 1 oti'ler development, fees to Tigard an ' amOurt e ua l to $205,264.00 less any application and permi.ttil g fees already paid in conriection with File Number SDR 96-- 0022 /VAR 90 -0033 (hereinafter "the project ") which offset shall not exceed $15,0 00.00 These funds shall be due and payable prior to receiving occupancy per mi t on the office structure approved under the project B. The funds in "A" above shall bo paid to the City And will be set aside in a separate fund account, to be used solely as a contri but, on to the traffic mitigation on Greenburg Road and at the Greenburg /Highway 217 1 ntercha nge in conjunction with like funds contributed 6.‘' a u 4-.. t4 -spa 1 i . i rr -1- �e - -a►a -- ne n �.�., °-by. r mitigation at Greehburg Roy;d or its connecting system), Any interest accrued on the funds paid under "A" above shall also be applied to the traffic mitigation projects. C. . The ? City 1$ accepting the funds referenced above as a contribution towards traffic ,Improvements s nts i n the area, a.nd will consider these funds to include ary streets System Development charges that would V otherwise , be due ors the project,, The City will dedicate the funds less any application and permitting fees already pail s referenced in paragraph A, to traffic tai ti gate on projects as referenced in paragraph D, The City is willing to dedicate these funds to a specific project or arta because these funds exceed the normal System DeVelopne! t costs and ar & being pro +Tided for the s p ec i f i c purpose of mitigating the traffic prob i ems In the area. The City is hot establishing a precedent regarding the application of City Tr-ant3por`tation Improvement Fees or System Develop'5nt Charges, that would apply to any future developments proposed by WCI 09/01 %91 505'vIPI ;ti'lG AI • r ti D. As a condition of the current Land Use Apps ,cation the project shall not be ` required to pay for any other mitigation oh Greenbbrg Road or its connecting system other than those already ` imposed as a condition of approval as listed in the above-referenced file number. It is understood that this agreement cannot exempt the project from any future local improvement districts. E. LELP shall contribute up to $50,000,00 to a traffic study to be conducted as .a, joint endeavor by Washington County, Tigard, the city of Beaverton, Oregon Department of Transportation and WCI. It is understood that Tigard shall request equal contribution from each party to the traffic study, In the event any of the funds referenced above are remai n I ng upon completion of the study, these funds shell be used by Tigard for the traffic mitigation on Greenbur•g Road or its connecting system. F, WCI shall contribute its traffic study report in complete detail to the joint traffic study referenced in "Dn above. The cost dst of WCI Is traffic study shall be credited towards its contribution to the joint' traffic study. G. WCI shall, withdraw completely etel 1` its appeal p ,� a�p_al on the pro,ject by, 4 :00 p.m. on Friday, March 1, l g91 and 'further agrees not to �� appeal i p anything else in connection i�, With the project through the completion of the Project's buildings. in H. LELP agrees not to appeal any f'utur'e applications or processed connection with those applications in the Washington Square development that are submitted by WCI or its affiliates, Agreed and entered into this day of February, 1991, WTNMAR PACIFIC, INC. By CITY OF TIGARb Its oo��l so5WPpojs r /Jr. LINCOLN EIGHT LIMI T E0 PARTNERSHIP By bavid Make, Vice- President Crow Oregon, Inc. General Partner v." F E G 2 s --91 1 F5,13 ,Si :.I '�"HU 1 S n `4 L7: j rosTER PER . 4 .1 2 ' 4 , , fiY.` PA, 2 , AGREEMENT between 'Lincoln Eight Limited Partnership (hereinafter LELP ), Wi nmar Company, Inc (hereinafter "WC/ �, d (hereinafter "Tigard"). and The City or Tigard �d RECITALS 1. LELP has received approval by the OGvelopment Review File Number SDR 9O 0022/VAR 90-0033, Director WC! has appealed the Drrector' reasons. decision for 2. of 1t$ Site traffic impact 3. The parties met on February 26, 199 and which would address the interest of all parties. AGREEMENT ji, (,0 The PartitS do hereby agree at follows:,..„, e 2J,I4 t `fir' tr ) That LELP Shall pay irk lieu of ! �`� AA other Tigard an amount equal t �gSTD00�;0 ices all the r�avel�p�ent fees to fees already paid in connection with rile any a)��li��,ti�t� and i�erm4tting (hereinafter `'the pr iject ") . These fund shall b SDR 9� QG ��gR o► U r U � 1e Number SD upon compl tion of the structures approve i under the � ct payable �n1, p et 0, The funds in 4A"+ above shall be paid into escrow with instructions to be agreed upon by the parties. Such instructions h s all only permit the use of said funds by Tigard sol e1 as on t n�ai l. y` contribution to the traffic mitigation on Greenburg Road and at the Gr interchange e n g ,► jj with like funds contributed bated b What` i.nter�nall a irr corn dpi ,y der � above NCI, � � via 217 pa l�E p _ e and held in escrow ham`" -` . � un � ��e �-�s are used b �rS Ord` � ..�� .� to cm —rte t 7 'C °� I� ' �ji.�C C't�t� �1/1 Mitigation on Gor the project t shall not be required to pay for any other or its connecting system unless it engages in further development within the area affecting Oreen ur g ' Read ar its 4:1 COhhecting system. L I 0 ;w h ° ru , 7. )Hr'kctA C.ww ba d l7 ` 3 ' D. LELP shall contribute . up to $50,000.00 to a. traff joint endeavor by Washington C. y be _ � , County, Tigard, . is �tUd to �ondUGt��! a� a y Q � ar � 0A e �. sand W0� , x�4 - y d � -� � .� p . 1- ' r.ef 1 s- -n d�-`'t -c h- a.r A l 1,-C- -- f In the event "an of the funds are remaining traffic the studyi these funds shall be used i� c�m��t p � �n �f mitigation on Grreenburg Road or its connectlt s st � y em, ':�be Tigard �w E. WCI Shall contribute its traffic study report to the joi tit, traffic stud y referenced in !a ti,l above F. WC.T shall withdraw ��pietel i � _ � �� p.m on Fr9da � y � appeal �►� the pr'�,�act by 3:00 W e i se a 1, and further agrees g i n cont� hot t� y ��t1��hW 1 1�� project, ea n with the pt 4ect,' i came to an agreement MFG, r)/27/01 505WPPDJE • in complete detail ■ ,t . 0. P. . a�. Aar rMI5- -tee -9 1. .1rI -1Ll 1 ORE &C: SEI 24" 944 f0.. FeB "47 ' 91 17:0 rOSTER A „ ER r -r P, 3/3 6. LELP agrees not to. appeal in future applications Washington Square development that are submitted by WCX r its affiliates. H. LELP's agreement to perform under this Agreement conditioned by the absence of any appeal that may be filed by any further n connection with the project. Should such an appeal be filed, not be obligated to perform. P shall Agreed and entered into this —,--- ar day of February, u�A1y D 79r'9 r r WINMAR COMPANY, INC. LINCOLN EIGHT � T LIMY TES PARTNtR5NIP 1114YwOrennoTrwropr..mvavfmkkr., 1t: City of Tigard Byh r 02127191 565W P Pi)j �y . David Blake, Vice.- President Crow Oregon, Inc,i Inca General Partner 4' 02/27'91 12:52 603 346 20'40 February 27, 1991 . .�na.c« roan iJi4.L`..rl1x.+J. - hA:c:. +wL�.- := i�•��VVrHn.r..Sw.w ..r..Y "- w - «A. «a .i! ,»_ .r.+,L.t «s- :..4':�.ni.J.�w.U..3N4w'. -.+u� HF_NDRICkS HALL, U OF 0 PAGE ► 2 0: rphy, Director, Community Development FM: Peter Watt, Coordinator, Public Policy Dispute Resolution Program RE: Meeting with Trammel Crow and Windmar Representatives In response to your request, I am sending you this summary of points of agreement reached during the subject meeting on February 26, 1990. /1. The City of Tigard (Ed Murphy) , Trammel Crow and Seyu (David Blake) , and Windmar/Washington Square (Jack Reardon) agree to Promote and Participate in a long range panning effort to deal with future traffic impacts '° in the area of interest. The planning effort will inw olve the county and state as well as representatives of other private developrnents. /2. The intent, a agree send letter to the other parties indicating its ntent, plans, and efforts to date to initiate this long-range planning effort. 3. Trammel Crow agrees to contribute $50,000 to traffic studies or impact mitigation efforts . Trammel Crow agrees to provide $225, 000 to the cit y (the amount the company would have paid in traffic impact fees if it had not obtained a permit prior to the effective date of the for use in mitigating ect�,y , future traffic impacts in the area ! of interest. 5 d Trammel Croat payments identified above will not be due until construction of the Proposed building is completed. el Crow and yu agree not t Trammel Se � se g to appeal future ', Windmar projects . Windmar agrees to drop its appeal of the city's decisions on the Trammel Crow Project by Friday, march 1, and to not file any future appeals on the Trammel Crow project. v MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Pat Reilly, City Administrator Randy Wooley, City Engineer Jerry Offer, Acting Senior Planner FROM: Ed Murphy, Community Development Director February 27, 1991 SUBJECT: Appeal of Lincoln Yesterday I met with Jack Reardon, David Blake Don Ekman, Peter Watt and Jerry Offer to discuss the Windmar appeal of the Lincoln 8 decision. (Peter Watt being there for `mediation" purposes - -he is a consultant,' under contract with DLCD to establish a land use dispute mediation program in Oregon. The Windmar appeal has been noticed and scheduled, for the March 4th Planning Commission meeting, and in fact, the Planning Commission packets have already gone out. This meeting was called to see if both parties would agree to a postponement of the hearing for 30 days, during which we would try a mediation approach. As it turns out, there is a good chance that Windmar 'will withdraw the appeal if certain things are agreed to by the, City and Trammel -Crow. These agreements would be mostly between Trammel- -Crow and Windmar,, and therefore private agreements. However, there would be a city committment as well. Details are as follows: TRAFFIC STUDY: City would agree to draft the scope of work for a traffic study in the general Washington Square /Lincoln Center, and'to bring the interestedrparties (ODOT, Washington County, Beaverton) together on that scope, the timelines and the financing of such a study. City would do that within 90 days 1 am to write a letter this week committing the city to doing, that Trammel -Crow would contribute up to $50,000 towards the traffic study, with the exact figure to be determined based on the scope of work and on some fair -share formula Windmar will contribute the traffic study that they have already completed, making it available to Trammel- Crow, the City and other agencies. (I am not certain if Windmar committed to contributing more than that, but I think the y would...de p erdan g on how has alread y been d one that would be usable i to the larger study). CAPITAL, IMPROVEMENTS Trammel; -Crow will agree to vountaril* pay the TIF fee (about' $215,2'64) to the City (which the otherwise do not have to ay because they had ' y p their plans` in before the deadline) , so long as those fees can be applied to capital improvements within the area...specifically Greenberg Road, or the 21'7; ramps. Road anal over ass, and agree, to making capital imp (Ja is willing to City .nand other facilities in the area. ck n Gre p is to the count �. cou the MSTIP Greenburg overpass money. as the County's 'contribution At first he said that he would be looking for a City contribution. I believe I convinced him that, since we are not collecting our ownstreets SDC, that would be impractical. Plus, we have a process for allocating funds that we, need to go through. Plus, L 0, • xL; we would be willing to commit Trammel's Crow's TIF funds to this project, which would be our contribution).. It is not necessary that this part be in the agreement The City would agree to delaying payment of the TIF until the occupancy permit stage, rather than at the building permit issuance stage. APPEALS: Windmar would agree to drop its' appeal of Lincoln 8 All agree that this agreement will be executed by Friday, March 1. In a separate private agreement, Windmar and Trammel-Crow-will agree not to appeal each others Projects. Trammel -Crow will also agree to urge Seiyu not to appeal any of Windmar's projects. PROCESS TO IMPLEMENT. I'll take the lead in writing the letter on the study and the city's committment to dedicate the TIF fees from Trammel. -Crow to increasing the capacity of Greenburg. Pat will sign the actual agreement, after Randy, Tim Ramis and 1 have reviewed it Don will draft the agreement between Windmar and Trammel -Crow. a.. MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD To: Ed Murphy Fromm: Brad Toast, Building Official Date: 2•. -27-91 Subject: Lincoln Fight, TIF vs SDC The Lincoln Eight project will not be subject to the TIF. An application and payment of the plan check fee ($14629.65) was submitted on October 19, 1990, which was prior to the October 22, 1990 deadline. of, building permits for all development for which a ding uermit The TIF ordinance stipulates "the ordinance .shall apply to �.ssu gp • rn�it Application is °eceived by the City on or after the effective date . ° The estimated TIF for the project is $2'5,264.00. The estimated SDC that the project is subject to is $45,120.00 5 imit. r\..4.4 p.c-? i 4vA1/4.0 x P .$' . , ,,,,i.c.t. teiv' ) mti , ix:4 /fie u\RxA.L. 4. ei?,1 5(Ti-, A 1-,LE- cfv,(-- (s'actrib ivl ot-eat-i? - ti,t? Nvi 444 Gc.,--kck 1.14Akl. c,A,1:61-y-v:A 4 Am reNvio/v-VcroicA i„,10,...r, „gams( efivatAkitAl reA, l' as-0.4 ovt. .'civtek-1 ct.e A-K 6664(73 0,.t.rt - yu,,, ,r,,\I 1. f-I, r 1 -pc. G.,-- a ',11\)e!1 kat( / ;‘,..,(tuc.51) (,,,.c...kw- (-*---- 4d" ik"- tiA CO GUI vcal efi ea cj:\ ....k.o,,,tin„ total. , MEMORANDUM CITY. OF TIGARD, OREGON TO City of Tigard Planning Commissioners FROM: Jer Offer, Acting Senior Planner DATE: February 25, 1991 SUBJECT: Appeal of SDR 90 -0022 /Variance VAR 90- 0033 (Lincoln Eight) On January 25, 199.1, the Planning Division approved subject to certain conditions the Site Development lication for th �.t .Review aPp m develo owners of the inlashin • Washington Eight office bu3ding. Wir�rmar Coanpany, development o f the Lincoln g n Square shopping center, have appealed the decision to the Planning Commission. The appeal is apparently based on the ' ` City of Tigard and Count washin ton y acceptance of g �s acce the transportation analysis by Lincoln Eight Partners and the decision's absence of a condition of approval requiring the developers of Lincoln Eight to participate in an area -wide transportation study and a commitment to assist in paying for roadway improvements that may be the study, e found. necessary by t and Associates which details traffic analysis pr p by T+�Tinmar has submitted a letter a �ared Kittelson a ter an .Winimar's disagreement with the applicant's transportation analysis' methodology, findings, conclusions, and recommended. mitigation measures. aa��ly P � © Development .Cody Section 18.32.320.A- states that an pP - ,y g a decision Ana entire subject of the a lication is open de by the Director shall be a de novo and therefore the pp open For review by the Planning Commission. For this reason, the entire record for this application is provided for the Commission's Attached Director's e appeal materials ,submitted by- Winmar, a cavx.e�nrof nth ' Py decision, the original application materials, letters of comment, and written communications amongst the applicant and the City and Washington County. The appeal materials do not specify which Community Development Code or Comprehensive Plan approval criterion is not satisfied by a lication� the development e appellants with Staff ° bel�.e�res that th ..g g P mpliance with Plan Policy 8,1.1. That Policy are alleging nom" -co states: The City shall plan for a safe and efficient street and roadway system that meets current needs and anticipated future growth and development Staff is not persuaded; by the appellant's' appeal submittal and analysis rtes that an error was made traffic anal. by Kittelson and Assoc�.a { • in the Director's decision's findings with regard to this Policy (pages 20 and 21 of the decision report). We do not find that a direct relationship exists between the potential traffic impacts of the proposed development and the need for an area-wide traffic study and i aprovements that may be found necessary by such a study. Staff ,continues to recommend that the prospective developer participate in such a study for purposes of improving their _development through improving the roadways that serve the area but we do not be.ieve the City should require this participation as a condition of development approval. Further, staff does not find that participation could be required at this time without the State, County, and City or cities affected having determined a scope of work of an area -wi.de traffic study or an estimate of the total cost and distribution of the cost of such a study. Since no issues have been raised with regard to the decision's findings relative to other approval criteria, staff recoxnxnends that g not modify these findings. the Planning Commission RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission dear the appeal of Site Development Review SDR 90 -0022 and Varian. 90 -0033. No 'natter whether the Commission approves or denies Lhe appeal, staff recommends that the Commission order the prevailing party to prepare the final order on this matter for the Commission's approval at 'tile , 199 meeting and for ttP artytoassune all resp onsibility for defending the decision on any subsequent appeals The final order should be reviewed by the staff and the City .Attorney's office prior to submittal to the Planning Commission. February 4, 1991 CO M P A, N Y, 1 N C r Mr. Jerry Offer Development Review Planner Community Development Department Post Office Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Jerry: Pursuant to our appeal of the Site Development Review SDR 90.0022, we want to provide you with some of our objections and concerns regarding this decision by the City of Tigard, Although the Lincoln Eight study attempts to describe the existing conditions, project impacts and proposed mitigation of the development, the methodology is flawed and the scope toe limited to address the more important systemwide deficienCies* Associated Transportation Engineers and Planners' ( TEP) use of "actual" trips at the y p averages, requires requires that perfect conditions exist in order for this analysis to be accurate. ITS averages are used • driveways, instead of Institute of • 'r'ratts csrtatxan • �ng>L>rYccrs I'�' ndustry -wide and have been revised and improved over many years of use to accurately describe the anticipated trip generation from a given use. The "actual" methodology used is fallacious as the study was conducted Labor Day week, and used an average traffic count for the total leasable square footage of existing buildings to detertnine the daily and P.M. peak hour traps per square foot generated by the site The existing buildings had unaccounted vacancies, especially Lincoln Seven which was leased but not yet Significantly occupielaw 'tyte 1TE averages for the total leasable square footage of the existing buildings should be used, for r d ed additions, purposes of arriving at existing conditions and trip generations �ant� f�pr proposed r e addition, t t g not kroa address r pIn ty ec i study osna background which are important ortant to overall level of service In the Washington Squ area, Washington ' . Department of Land Use and 'Transportation's discussion pl' system wide improvement requirements it the Notice of Washrn � ton Qu.nty � �epa.r D evelo ment Review SDR described this ass P tie in some detail, The Decision (Site e � p � � 90-0022) county" agreed with ` the Lincoln Center analysis that, under the Lincoln Eight proposal, southwest Orenburg Road would operate at acceptable levels of service, with the recommended improvements a- but writ pn to say that "the analysis also makes clear that on southwest Grecnbur ; to ' � � . ; - . l the County swe will be traffic I�,r��u �s nearing a point Where the � , . a .. level �f ;service �� like acceptable, and although this project does not yet ar�ush the system, . . , to pvint out. that concern �i© growth rd vv h owners of this area." is of serious public concern and should be of c e property .V41 E7101,1 AVkNut. 8UITE 280(ATEWAY TOWCI4, 8EArrLL:, WA x8104,5626 0.138) t23,45e0 FAX ;?,00-4$61, AliOLY TO !?O. 8OX 21646, 8V.A1TLC, WA 0811;- 448 # L6811 'egg B 4-g0 eg goy dLO: -8 E.30G ,IOTdOaelel. X0,1sX :)ti N .V Mr. Jerry Offer February 4, 1991 page two This County stated that it should be in the interest of all parties to "participate in an area- wide traffic management study" and "in an appropriate level of mitigation of the identified traffic problems" as a result of these studies. Winmar is requesting that the City of Tigard act upon this recommendation and require 1) Lincoln Center participation in the studies, 2) %r neeln� Center participation in the recommended mitigation resulting from the studies and 3) participation by all other applicants that have an impact on the Washington Square transportation system. Simply making participation a recommendation of design review approval will not lead to the desired result, Utilizing some form of an agreement to join in future improvement districts, at some proRortx!onate share, would assure the viability of this type of program. Winmar is in the process Of assembling an application for design review which includes some expansion of the existing Washington Square shopping center. As we have expressed in the past, we remain concerned about the growing traffic congestion around Washington Square and stand ready to participate in the above Ueseribed programs, ! We believe that due to the multiple jurisdictions affecting the Washington Square area, that the State, County and City should participate in this effort, We look forward to implementing a long -term traffic improvement strategy, which is in the best interest of all concerned, Sincerely, W NMAR CO 1:.r' , INC J. Rau • , to , Vice Pr ' K;nm c: Dan; Seeman Jack Reardon, Scott King Douglas Norval Tholas Schwab l? 8 # 1J63L t89 809 rAg"JV86Z908 ' YYdLO i 8 l 6 - i 1,30L X0)eX :A .N S COMPANY February 4, 1991 Mr. Jerry Offer Devctopment Review Planner Community Development Departmcn Post Office Box 23397 Tigard„ OR 97223 1 N 0 Dear Jerry: leklentSg22.asilleglliSlairtio �C want to provide you Pursuant to our appeal SDR 90-0022, of the Site Development ardinw this decision by the City of Tigard. with some of our objections and co, ce $ g Eight existing conditions, pro,�ecxszo,paats Although the Lincoln Ei ht study attempts to describe the existiu f flawed and the scope too . the development, the ruethodola y and proposed mitigation of is a limited to address the more important system -wide deficiencies. Assccifted Transportation. Engineers and Planners' A T]EP) Ius of "actual" 7r rip re at that driveways, instead of Inst�tute Transportation to -bc �a� ( �. � f � used y ,e o f T` Engineers i improved .�be>< curly yea ITE averages are u Per£ect con.�litrans ea�ist in order for this a y use actual Methodology accurately xndustry-wide and have been revised and "actual" � a thodology used is describe the anticipated trip generation from a given use. The the study was eon an averse traffic count for e conducted ducted 1Ga,bom Day week, and dse fallacious tugs to determine the daily and P.M4 peas. as the total leasable square footage of existing build. e ' buildings hgd unaccounted hour trips per square foot generated by ` the site. The cxieting vaen ucxee, especially Lin col n S ever which way leased but t not yet significantly ca tly occupied. The ITS averageaf or the total leasable sgtare f ootage of t he existin g buildings s should be heed for purposes of arriving at existing conditions and trip generations for propose additions, In addition, E term -wide improvements .that are :: ATEP study did not adequately address sya ty n the itated by existing background traffic, which important to `overall level of o service necessitated i ca. Washington County' Department of Land Use and service an the washi�agton Square ax � � g i� n the Transportation's discussion of lystemswide iinprovemett requirements issue in th detail, Notice of The Decieion (Site Development Review SDR, 90 -0022) described co uAiy 1$ r fed with the LiAco lII Center analysis t iat, r nder the Lincoln E g } P r... . p QQa ti southwest �rucnburg Road would operate at acceptable table levels of ce � w the �eomme improvements .Ebut wen t on to sa y that " the analysis also makes c lear that raffic on southwest Greenburg Road is nearing a point where the level of service will be unacceptable, and although this project does not yet 'crush' se system, the County would like ... t point out that traffic growth in the Greenburg Road area is of serious public concern and should be of caneern to the property owners of this area. S e 1' F 71 , AVSNUr, wUITE, `6ti0 0,ATeWAY ` OWCR, 8EI,Tii,5, WA 981j94 -5026 t1 Ot9I 223.4500 FAX 23 -45 Rt;pLY TO Pt7.9OX 21646, etArTLt.V1wA 11"A 11:4546 . Gt lir�'H it tel 4-92339O3 I dLO E 18 =V -8 .3O1. .logdooe I a1 to .1 X :AG 1N S Mr. Jerry Offer February 49 1991 page two The County stated, that it should be in the interest of all parties to °',participate in In area- wide traffic management appropriate mitigation of the identified area- wide gemQnt �studye�, and yin an ap - ropr�:ate itsvel of :m traffic problems° as a result of these studies, Winmer is regueeting that the City of Tigard trct upon this recommendation and require 1) Lincoln Center participation in the studies, 2) Lincoln Center participation in the recommended mitigation resulting from the studies and 3) :Participation by all other applicants that have an impact on the Washington square transportation system. Simply making participation a recommendation of design review approval will not lead to the desired result. Utilizing some form of an agreement to join • future improvement districts, at some proportionate share, would assure the viability of this type of program Win Mar is in the procees of assembling an application for design review which includes some ` the existing Washington Square shopping center As we . expressed in the expansion of S have exp past, we remain concerned about the growing traffic congestion around Washington Square and stand ready to participate in the above described programs. We believe that due to the multiple jurisdictions affecting the Washington Square area,, that the State, County and, City should participate in this effort. We look forward to implementing a long -term traffic improvement strategy, which is in the best interest of all concerned, J. Ran Vice Prid; ca Dan Seeman Jack Reardon Scott Xing Douglas Norval Thomas Schwab g #!L83L fiQ gO9 4-.g9gi'EZk;90 Vii : 130 L Xo,Jex�eg leas RECEPJE.D t5e 19S1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ..///i/i7e eA?) `7C/ Are Ze 0/2 c C2 L J i/f Z,`,/ /./0/4,:-/7 1 47,/2,�- e 3/4->vx--- en ',,, ar...4? hobf s Li ..; d k Cry z /r3 COY` e %�"e -S j r? G2,fiC, A-21>--)e /75-CSC / , 'e .!)-,-4 ....Z..,. 4(11//)-70 3(../.- -- /1- //-2 di-7 0 e/dc/)-1 C /.%" 64 ✓'; , i -,o' &J 7eue/b 0-2"0 1 Ji /. s /so , e- // ,)em 2 /M ,„..J- /"//---,-/,) C: ei ' --- e //6/ /d he_bic ./ /i !2 7 tZ�Z r d i n� c; ' C�'-S 100 4a' ,/2(-? a a / 4 ,a,/y) c 64. ,8- i S fl c - e ('% S'/ e ,i-ri c-1. / ,, s /I 5., a/I C 0,,. i / / /4„/ 0 , g C._ s /2 c.d' 4 ,mac' 5 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Ed Murphy, Community Development Director FROM Cathy Wheatl , Cit Recorder DATE: February 1, 1991 SUBJECT: Appeal of SDR 90 -0022; Variance VAR 900033; Lincoln VIII Partners Attached is a copy of an appeal received today for the above - referenced Director's Decision. Mr. J. Randy Kyte filed the appeal and said he would be sending a more detailed letter on the grounds for appeal on Monday. February 4 Ms. Kyte asks that he be notified as soon as possible advising him of the date of the appeal hearing before the Planning Commission. : Jerry' Offer (with original appeal document ' for file LAND USE DECISION APPEAL FILING 'FORM The City of Tigard supports the citizen's' right to participate in local government. Tigard's Land Use Code therefore sets out specific requirements for filing appeals on certain lard use decisions. The following form has been developed to assist you in filing an appeal of a land use decision in proper form. To determine what filing fees will be required or to answer' any questions you have regarding the appeal process, please contact the Planning Division or the City Recorder at 639 -•4171 APPLICATION BEING APPEALED: SDR 90-0022 Variance VAR 90-0033 HOW p0 YOU QUALIFY AS A PARTY: Adjacent Property Owner to west, Winmar Pacific, Inc. GI`` A OREGON SPECIFIC GROUNDS FOR APPEAL OR REVIEW; The traffic study performed by Asso- ciated Transportation Engineering & Planning dated September 1990 and as amended in a letter to Washington County dated November 29, 1990 is inade- quate to give the approving agency a full understanding of the traffic impacts of the proposed office development. The methodology applied ed th e analysis does not ade q uately address the Project's impacts on adjacent Properties and surrounding transportation systems. The applicant has not been required to provide adequate mitigation of traffic impacts. Please see a further discus sion in the attached Kittelson letter to Winmar Company, Inc. SCHEDULED DAB" DECISION �� TO BE FINAL; February 4; 1991 DATE NOTICE OF FINAL •DECI''': • •,%WAS IeEN s January 25, 1991 SIGNATURE(S): rileP d. Ra d yt- ice dent Wi nna Company, Inc. .40/70 ar" m FOR OFFICE USE ONLY �, C�eoe i v��j�dJ f3. � �'�•�- ?t °ft.•�••� �•it � �%St••�{•••�t••it �i�•�••�•�-�•�'�•k �•k- �•it �• • - • *�t�E�•�f X-- ••K *X 4 i4}t X,.H {.X.*4 .X.•*X X'•WX•• ••i�I * •X•)t•lt �Q.,X.) *X �t•Dt X *X )4X x i4a'()•? Y )�. *X We X* �., � {/� �) ,.,f.{ WW. (mot �1 _ j �. p l j �/,',,��'y � � ,... C1 � �. � ✓'. Time �y Aplpf o4ed As To ! orrn 8y: Jyr �r4.+°�� Date: t ime.� Denied ed A s To Form 8y: D-* 0t• (* iX n Xt X dk 0Ex X * XX -•i044 M Xx•* X - )tx4ME0 k-* K x x 4° *** *• _ lw/4e46A g g 50 639 -417 13125 S'tNNoli Blvd., P,:�J, Box 23397, Ti card, Oregon 97223 (� ) January 31, 1991 Project No.: 479.00 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING /TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 512 S.W. BROADWAY m PORTLAND, OREGON 97205 (503) 228.5230 0 FAX (503) 273 -0169 Mr. Randy Kyte Winmar Company, Inc. 700 Fifth Avenue Suite 2600 Gateway Tower Seattle Washington 98104 -5026 SUBJECT: Review of Transportation Impact Analysis Performed for the Expansion of Lincoln Center Dear Mr. Kyte: Kittelson & Associates, Inc. has been retained by Winmar Company, Inc. to conduct a traffic analysis of the proposed 175,000 square foot expansion of Washington Square shopping center and possible development of a maximum of 125,000 square feet of office space. In preparation for this analysis, it was necessary to review all traffic studies recently conducted in the area. A traffic study was completed in September, 1990 for the Lincoln Eight office building directly across Greenburg Road from Washington Square. Thus, this study was obtained from the City of Tigard and was reviewed as a part of the analysis. Consensus regarding the analysis approach for the Washington Square traffic study was reached in a meeting with City of Tigard, Washington County and ODOT staff at the inception of the project. Consistent with other traffic studies of this type, it was agreed that the study should document the following conditions: Existing Conditions Future Background Conditions without the project Future Background Conditions with the project As a starting point, it was necessary to review the Lincoln Center Eight traffic analysis, conducted in September 1990 by Associated Transportation Engineers and Planners (ATIEP). It was expected that the existing operations of the Greenburg 'Road system could'' be gleaned from this report. In addition, since the background traffic to be considered in the Washington Square analysis included only one In- Process development -K Lincoln Center Eight -- it was, ,0 Mr. Randy Kyte January 31, 1990 Page 2 further assumed that the ATEP study would have a complete report of the future traffic conditions on Greenburg Road without the Washington Square project. Since City, County and State transportation staffs had reviewed and approved the ATEP report, it was assumed by this consultant that its contents could be taken at face value. During the analysis process, Kittelson & Associates compared the findings and conclusions in the ATEP report and discovered that they were significantly different than those reached in our independent analysis. This lead us to carefully examine the methodology and assumptions that were used in the ATEP analysis. We found the .following discrepancies and/or apparent inadequacies with the ATEP report: Peak flour Conditions: The study identified that the most critical time period fur operations on the adj 'cent street system occurs during the p.m peak hour (4 :30,5:30 p.in.). Thus, it was determined that the analysis would consider only the p.m. peak hour impacts of the Lincoln Eight development. An office development such as Lincoln Eight has substantial a.m. peak hour traffic. Since turning movements during this peak may require entirely different lane requirements than that of the p.rn. peak hour, an a.m. peak hour analysis should have been performed. The subsequent analysis conducted by Kittelson & Associates for the a.m. peak hour revealed that the future background a.m. peak traffic impacts were actually less than that of the p.m. peak hour. Thus, the absence of an aztn peak analysis had no substantive effect on the findings and conclusions of the analysis; Trap Generation: The method of estimating the trip generation of the proposed Lincoln Eight building was erroneous. Rather than using the standard procedure outlined in the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trib generation M... a , the ATEP analysis involved determining a trip generation rate per square foot of office space by manually counting the trips into and out of every driveway of the Lincoln office complex and dividing this total by the total number of gross square feet of office sp ace in these buildings, This method may have been more valid if: 1) The counts had not been conducted during the week: of Labor Day • Mr. Randy Kyte January 31, 1990 Page 3 2) The Lincoln Center had been fully occupied. Because of these factors, the ATEP analysis reported that the Lincoln Center is curit;ntly generating approximately 25 percent less p.m. peak hour trips than inde p endent driveway counts conducted by Kittelson & Associates indicated (conducted on a typical weekday: Thursday, September 10, 1990). These are consistent with estimates obtained using nl:'E procedures. The ATFP analysis then used the trip generation rate per sgrtare foot of office space to determine the estimated trips for the proposed Lincoln Eight. While this method was erroneous, it surprisingly had little sulvatantive effect on the findings and conclusions of the analysis. However, in the Washington Square analysis to be concluded in February 1991, the more appropriate ri'E rates will be used. Level of Service Analysis: . In determining � traffic impacts and required mitigations, .several, discrepancies in were dicovered i the level of service calculations performed in the ATEP analysis, Some o y of these are discussed below: Greenburg Interchange - The existing Greenburg interchange with Highway 217 is a diamond interchange with a single controller running at an 80 second cycle during the porn. peak hours In the ATEP' analysis, the northbound ramp intersection was analyzed using a 110 - second cycle and the southbound ramp intersection was analyzed using an 89- second cycle. Since the two signals at the interchange ramps are controlled by a single controller, the use of two different cycle lengths is incorrect. The conclusion reached from the analysis was that an additional southbound lane on Greenburg Road would be necessary. Our analysis revealed that, with appropriate signal timing modifications, the Greenburg Road interchange would operate acceptably without adding lanes on the overpass. Our analysis further indicated that the additional southbound lane on the overpass would! additional overpass , be beneficial to overall capacity in the area, extend the effective � and capacity of ' the interchange to accommodate future development . • • li Mr. Randy Kyte January 31, 1990 Page 4 Our preliminary analysis indicates the need for an additional improvement that was not reported in the ATEP study. This improvement responds to the high p.m, peak hour volume of right turning traffic from the Highway 217 southbound off -ramp onto Greenburg Road. The required mitigation would require addition of second southbound lane on Greenburg Road between the southbound off -ramp intersection and Cascade Avenue. We believe that the ATEP report would have reached the same conclusion if the analysis had been performed using consistent assumptions and methods as described above: GreenburgMapiereaf Intersection - The HCM level of service analysis procedure was incorrectly performed for the intersection. The result of the existing analysis, as presented in the AMP report, indicated a level of service (LOS) " "F" during the p.m. peak hour at this intersection. This Using field measured signal timings our analysis showed that the y operating at an acceptable LOS " "De intersection is currentl o er For these rayons, the conclusic,ns and required mitigations included in the ATEP report are different than those reached in our analysis. Those differences can be summarized as: An additional southbound lane on the Greenburg overpass is not necessary to accommodate existing or future traffic (with Lincoln Eight). Retuning of the coordinated interchange signal system would improve existing and future levels of service to acceptable standards An additional southbound lane on Greenburg Road between the southbound ramp intersection and Cascade Avenue is necessary to maintain acceptable service levels. The GreenburgiMapleleaf intersection is currently operating at an acceptable LOS "D" during the pm. peak hour: We believe that it is critical that the City, County and Mate agencies be, aware of these inc onsistencies, to ensure that future development in the area is provided adequate street capacity .44 i a u a. .31 z. w .w 4 Mr. Randy Kyte January 31, 1990 Page 5 I hope this letter adequately addresses our concerns regarding the ATEP report. If you have and questions or comments that I may be, able to answ Ir, please don't hesitate to call. Sincerely, 0 M i' A February 4, 1991 Mr. Jerry Offer Development Review Planner Community Development Department Post Office Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Jerry: SDR 90- 0022 /Lincoln Center Pursuant to our appeal of the Site Development Review SDR 90 -0022, we want to provide you with, some of our objections and concerns regarding this decision by the City of Tigard. Although the Lincoln Eight study attempts to describe the existing conditions, project impacts and proposed mitigation of the development, the methodology is flawed and the scope too limited to address the more important system -wide deficiencies. Associated Transportation Engineers and Planners' (ATEP) use of "actual" trips at the driveways, instead of Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) "averages," requires that perfect conditions exist in order for this analysis to be accurate, ITE averages are used industry-wide and have been revised, and improved over many years of use to accurately describe the anticipated trip generation from a given use. The "actual" methodology used is fallacious as the study was conducted Labor Day week, and used an average traffic count for the total leasable square footage of existing buildings to determine the daily and P.M. peak hour trips per square foot generated by the site. The existing buildings had unaccounted vacancies, especially Lincoln Seven which was leased but not yet significantly occupied. The g existing buildings should be used for 1TE averages for the total leasable square footage of the existin buildin s purposes of arriving at existing conditions and trip generations for proposed additions. In addition, the ATEP study did not adequately address system -wide improvements that are currently necessitated by existing background traffic, which are important to overall level of service in the Washington Square area, Washington County's Department of Land Use and Transportation's discussion of system -wide improvement requirements in the Notice of Decision (Site Development Review SDR 90-0022) described this issue in some detail, The County agreed with the Lincoln Center analysis that, under the Lincoln Eight proposal, southwest Greenburg Road would operate at acceptable levels of service, with the traffic southwest but Road is nearing that "the analysia also. makes clear that r ' g g point where the level of service will be unacceptable, and although this project does not yet 'crush' the system, the County would like to point out that traffic growth in the Creenbnrg Road area is of serious public concern and should be of concern to the property owners of this area," , 1.0 =( Li �u,9 .i il l M'IMadu ?, E.lt i�: . Lw64 ,tt Mr, Jerry Offer February 4, 1991 page two The County stated that it should be in the interest of all parties to "participate in an area wide traffic management study" and "in an appropriate level of mitigation of the identified traffic problems" as a result of these studies. Winmar is requesting that the City of Tigard act upon this recommendation and require 1) Lincoln Centex: participation in the studies, 2) Lincoln Center participation in the recommended mitigation resulting from the studies and 3) participation by all other applicants that have an impact on the Washington Square transportation system. Simply making participation a recommendation of design review approval will not lead to the desired result. Utilizing some form of an agreement to join in future improvement districts, at some proportionate share, would assure the viability of this type of program. Winmar is in the process of assembling an application for design review which includes some expansion of the existing Washington Square shopping center„ As we have expressed in the past, the growing traffic congestion around Washington Square and st, we remain concerned about ready to participate in the above described. programs. We believe that due to the multiple jurisdictions affecting the Washington Square area, that the State, County and City should participate in this effort. We look forward to implementing a long -term traffic improvement strategy, which is in the best interest of all concerned. Sincerely, WINM R CO , INC Dan Seeman Ja A Reardon Scott King Douglas Norval Thomas Schwab r 4. x,11201 : L -D WASHINGTON COUNTY, Jf ' " OREGON January '16, 1991 Je rY offer Tigard Planning tePartMe PeOv Box 23397 Tigardk OR 97223 TO: 503 684 ?297 r JAN 16. 1'lry' `g sq s3 IINCOIN EIGHT �►t. has viewed this Pr l ,and traffic anaysis and mits wa�,t��.nc�.an county y tho following recommendod recommend conditions and CCrmnts .,cO A O _ FINALJOIRovAWISSMIc.8 o = ' SUb LU± Plans obtain i a Division aPProPVal , and obtain a facility permit for Const ruetien of the follading public improvements: vements : truet the row map�.e1e f trive entran to i :111e the exit lanes 1. CGl'L5 ��. t lane) and, a s��.c.�t (two left turn �.ari and e1� design, timing, and �. st,:�ip3� rev area. G' a�d mod, pie.1eaf Drive necessary t'' revisions at accommodat this improvement. 2. Provide 200 feet of two lane storage on the LoOkIZt Street westbowd approaCh. to Greenburg Read. hese improvements (wig SW Greenburq Road ri t ot.Y) shall be constructed in am")ordance with the reqpirelnents of the Washington County Uniform Road InloroveMent DeSign Standards. ti • ,I It7R T . CX:''Ct7PAI 'Y The road imProvements revlited by onditib ' A,.1, and 2, S l be complebe aria accepted by the . Ca va ' 4 corsIEiars arterial arid is idel* i f ied an the SW Gr� Rid is a County �,nta.�r. C: or the ,rntywide' mad' Systet�. n � . t retain jurisdiction of q � Wa hl.. �n County Transportation P aih .� It i the policy of Washington County to i oloon that maintain their fancy ` , roads, �i.rid to enbure t��.t �e� facilities �.an of mcsv�.nq, lame volumes of traffic, c, Departmont of Land Use and Transportation, Land Devoiop►rihnt 8orvices Division 41850- Phone: t�3/ d8��l7E�i 1-iiCCabr�rn, Oregon 9�'i2i1 AX: 'i 45b3/693.441 P i55 North Pi-s( AvernJe County analysis of the Lincoln Eight piXOO al indicates that SW Greenburg Road can operate at an acceptable level of ser"l. oe if the recommended lnprovements above are installed. d. The analysis also niakes clear tilat traffic orn sw Greenburg Road is nearing a point where the level of service will be unacceptable, able, Althoc this projedt does not yet "crush" the system„ the qty would like to point out that traffiC grcMth in the Gretenburg load area is of serious public concern, and should be of «anew to the property owners of this are.. county staff is aware of the potential for further intense develc.nt by other p Y ors in this area This potential future dreloptent plus the crntinuedioa of ` the Lincoln Center site leads the County to believe that it is in the best int:erests interests of both the private and public seers to 'partici,patq in an area wide t 'affic ranagement study. •�L Washington County recomMends that the Lino In Center property ow participate with other major interest .s, both public and private, along SW Greenburg Road in an area wide study of future traffic demands, PrOblems, and necesaarY imProveillents. These Parties should then PartictiPat9 at an appropriate level to a tLtigat the identified traffic problems, The County ls�it is in the best long to interest of Lin Coln Cent and other property owners in this area to participate iirt an effort such as this. Washington sum a devot�.e. its resources County sta�, t.d�p participate rc� arad as nessr and capable Sru c Wa.`r`r'�er, tdrecrtor Joe Gri.l r , Land - Deve1 e nt: Manager boug Itorval d Traffic Ax .yet FROM : ENDO e UN 41. From: w V 'Or your information 0 File 0 Action required n TO 523 684 ?297 nEC J-0$ 1990 12 5 ?FM t#686 P . 02` ' •'+.'rarwur Lwyarwp. Washington County bopartment of Land Use and Transportation MEMO Project: �-' %.I(9 1 ,A Pro ect No - .1 Message: JAZ 1� .•.r t re •.wF 4 6r# Ir' ' AA Wok • ;�•. Ptbkii bWJ1.iLA 41f�•Y._ wKr�rrwr -r•, ��mrarrr Yn4...- �.- �.rWWSrricvrn.• -rte .. .. .LY.YII $14,11 ` ..^ .. wi dr, r91wv.' r.-$-.... 1Mnrt1.+ -..... • Action required (who, what whe �y I 2 - F` . .� / AAA 1 1-4 roh Un. Paoli 1$.4 +Irleovir�•r L.I.r.... L■ :ay:41.,$r. L..,:nti. ... :;n:. _ ,..... I. $:..m..orr+ .,.$4....r.rNi ,a, i... ,.__,y -e.-F: ` rr.- .4i1lLiYIr..1. "•• «.----- ''"••_-4-- ., ...: . _._..� a .. a�l:_. 'v J . �.... �:•rN�N,.« «t ..,W..tieiirr -, ..41+6$11tvroirr+.. ' ``..•� "...■1+r :ter ±..".......- ..... «...« 1$6, ry-,. ,::. Lam• M ' .. 1r l.r +i.wun: , e.c.1..d:Mr -I — ,.. .- _..iia„A;, ... . L “...1.e... • a . .�L y,�,• •JII {N':rrl�� i_ ��rrµ . ". , .._, ta�L�1Trr-- �.NiV:WwwfR .�wr.,.' "_ -7rrw N...i r..xa., .L.16.'Knr.• :ice„_.. •••- ...wir,w+ ,......J,•. -.-u: •- :....w.nY.uMWr.r+r.. ... ._.. .... _,.. ,.., �..�: ::Li.L.L.o •.iw ..u.aYrYr «- .':. N,.,/ L-: LwrY.."s ••+inr r .-r J�J.�r.dL..+•r.rn«•rr •...:.L.r....�+... -..d «., _CAYC+eie ti§ti 11. • FROM : L -D WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON DATE: Ov , TO: -.. FAX NUMBER:)— FROM: if A TO 503 584 729? NOU 20, 1990 3 :01PM 14554 F. 81 WASHINGTON COUNTY LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION 150 NORTH FIRST AVENUE HILLSBORO,'OREGON 97124 FAX NUNGER 1 -503 - 693 -4412 /4 /,V A lr FROG NUMBER L A %tttllrA1,* 4:) A Total number of pages (including cover) If all pages do hot arrive in legible for (503) 648.8761. my please contact receptionitt o NOTES 15,5 North Ott Avenue QC.01-A3 ,6-1-i-frr DepartrriOnt Of Late UtO And Tratisportatidn► Adhlirldstratiorn Hillsboro, O+regioh 97124 Phone: 503/648,6761 FAX # 503/693.4412 -FROM: L -D WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON TO: ith Liddn Tigard Plana Department, ' P.O. Box 23397 Tice, OR 97223 523 694'7297 110U 20, 1990 3:02PM *554 P.22 l aV Ter 20, 1990 SDR 90 .-0022 / LINCOLN EIS WashingtanCountY has Preliminarily pie the traffic study for this PMPoSal and find that a need the fo11L7WWing additional information to let.e our revieW and provide recx* s ations a 1. i; AD''s should be Shown on all pct., area links, as well as the pert imnaot on each link. The game trip generationmethodolocri as used, in the Lincoln V report Should be used for this study (ie, ITE rates). 3. analysis shcfuld be inoluded for those intend traffic mokre tts wh a,.c�.h are heaviest during the Inoming peak, mom hour. 4. The addition of a southbound lane to GreenburgRoild ig not an assumed iMProvement. It ShoOld be analyzed ag an alternative for 'JmitxgatiQa't;` In a se wateci Detailed a tions; a the limits of a the l and the �gnal tutting CPt.3t'►iza'G1o1 needed for this latlect should be specified. A $tom distances should be calculated available storage for seParato tarn lanes j or through rtweimentp ithin the . 4Should loe identified for queU Bch extend across upstream 6. L l road links and intorsooticms servicing the site should also be analyzed If you have ally ttuestions rega ing theme relluilleitents , Pleage contact al o- COunty Ttaffitr Analytt at 648a07614 IlAs4hingtort 00Unty 's reOoMmendation req4rding this proposal will be fowc ed to the City of `le d .t to our review a> a .rat. traffic ys s. tt Transpottation Planter Chri8 retviW, City of Tiga 1100 Ori1 c), Land t eltilln t Manager r Dot1g Norval/ Tratfic AnedYst ` 1130 IVr nth First Avoi1u0 be ssrtr ent of La Used Arid TrahatStiritition, Lid Develoomoht '86rvicc C lulsl ►ti Hills br5rv, Oregon reti�n� �Tt Phono; da / 648-07(i J IS FROM :L -D WASHINGTON I� OLJ CIV'T OREC�(7N Y, DAT: uhgti TO: Toy lw TO: 503 524 7297 JAN 16, 1991 5 :08FM #019 F.01 WASHINGTON COUNTY LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION 150 NORTH FIRST AVENUE HTLLSBOROa OREGON 97124 FAX NUMBER I- 5O3m6 3 -4412 FAX NUMBER: 1- 6 ,.. _ PROD `gYYRY4. �Y 1 I Y�1�1y� FROM: . 46.4- U t 3.i Total number of pages (including cover): if all pages do not arrive in l legible form, please contact receptionist a (gO3) 648 -8751; NOT tS 155 North Pitst Avenue acs i td1V ■ Y w�yi�ryll r.1LL`., e 4 1 6 4 1 , . • . I 'rsF 'i"'Za Via C +kg'V104164 0C C. c (. f b k Ott; SP ON ' f P 121-4, �I DaPertrnent ot Land Use And Tranaprr'tatlon, Adrninlatration Hitisborol Ore cri 07124 lzhone: 563/646-V 0f if A # 50r4/500.4412 503 684 729? JAN 16, 1991 WASHINGTON �rti ,4 5 ;h ,,,fM OR.EGON January 16, 1991 JOrtY Of fer Tigard Planning ;r` nt .0 Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 Re: LThioDth EIGHT Wa8 irigtan C intY has reviewed this proposal and traffic analysis and submits tho :following reconmended conditions and t r tt> nts FNiATh A. QU: ..% . 1 OF.. :? . 8140nlit Plans, obtain ineerinq Division app 'a1, and Obtain a facility pert for congtruction of the following fng lic i r re►er'r e 1. construct the tlew Mapleleaf Drive entranoe to inolude three exit lanes (two, left turn lanes and one . t . ugl/ fight lam) and a strai h't stadking area Pride all signal designr design timing and lane striPing revisions at Greellburg Pei and MaPleleaf Drive necessary to accommodate this itrtmement. 2 . amide 200 feat of two lane stodge on the I xt Street westbuhd approach to Greenburg d TheEe i oV th *within SW Greenburg mad right-of-say) shall be construoted in accordance 'with h t e requirements of the Waalington County Uniform Poad :T r+ ve.. nt Deign Standards. . PRIOR TO OCCUPANY The road improverontz required ' condition A..1 ahol 2. hall be complete and aocePtea bY the County., COMMENIg SW Gr p 1R.oad is a C: try rnihr arterial and it identified in the Washington County' Tromp static n plain az part of the C. tywi e d SYstem,, s ... of Wash oti mount to to j uri .i iof of Xty ide ' to sure ' a�e fay 1itie x intain f� .on of mCri It � roads large ,vole .. ; of traffic aepartmont of Land Us0 and TranGportatioh; Lind Develapmtnt [ lv(sion 436013 155 North rifat Avernue; hdlsbare, Oregon 67124 Phone: 5O3/G48 -B7E,1 0/ ,X: 1.503/693-44'12 FROM:L -D LINC(LN EIS 3anuuxy 16, 1501 Page TO: 503 694 ?297 JAN 16, 1991 5: 09PM' 1401.9 P. 03 county analysis of tie Lir)co1n Eight proposal indicates t SW Greenbilrg Road can orate at an acceptable level of service _ if the r r er dd improvements ire are installed. The analysis also ^ clear t traffic can sW Greenburg Road is nearing a point level of service will be unacceptable. Ait ou4h this Project does yet, ,crt ► e t , the untY would like point out that traffic grow(a't in the creenbury Road area is of siou, ,e 1 �� corn, ` std �f �nc�a.Pr► ��► °�}�� ►r��Y of this arta. County staff is aware of the potential for further intense develOPment by other property owners in this area This potential future developnent plus the continued Rican of the Lincoln meter site leads the County to believe that it is in the best interests of Imich the Private and Public sectors to particiPate, in an area wig traffic ranagement stud►. Washington County recommends the ln ` Property owners ;panicspate with other m jor intereL4ts, both public and private, along SW Orecrbuzg Road an an area � vide Ott of future tiffs demands, pYabl eis, and appropriate improveMents. These �d should then participate at an ].evel to mitigate the identified traffa.0 problems. The CountY err' it is in the lit long term interest of Lincoln Center and aver pr rty r in this area ` o r ioipate in an effort such as this. Washington in County stands ready to �icl to i such a process and devote its resources as n :ces and capable, 1e If You have any questions, please contaa Ile at 64$ -8761 gcott 1'1 . Trans rr do z Planner Bruce Warner Warneri bireotar Joe ri.�. c , Land Development nt Eger boug Norval, Traffic MaiYst t 9 1" WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON Keith Liden Tigard Planning Department P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 November 20, 1990 Re: SDR 90-0022 / LINCOLN EIGHT Washington County' has preliminarily reviewed the traffic study for this proposal and find that we need the following additional information to complete our review and provide recommendations: 1. Existing ADT's should be shown on all impact area links, as well as the percent impact on each link. 2' The same trip generation methodology as used in the Lincoln V report shouz,d be used for this study (ie, .Ll' rates) An AM analysis should be included for those inbound traffic movements which are heaviest during the morning peak hour. The addition of a southbound lane to Greenburg Road is not an assured improvement. It should be analyzed as an alternative for mitigation, in a separate section Detailed reccm nendations r,rdyng. the limits of the lane addition and the signal timing optimization needed for this project should be specified. $tacking distances should be calculated and compared to available storage for separate turn lanes and major through movements within the impact area. Mitigations should be identified for queues which extend across upstream inte. intersections. T. • Local road links and inter ions servicing the cite should also be analyzed. If you have any questions raiding these requirements lease contact Doug Norval, Count,_ Traffic Analyst at 648 -8761. Washington p Y Y as'h�on County's recc.l'nmendation reg revue of prop . i 11 be forwarded. to the Ca ty of Tigard subsequent to r and this al w w f a complete traffic analysis. Cott idfig Transportation Planner C Chris Davies/ City of Tigard Joe Cxrillo, Land Dre.c:nt Manager 'Traffic An U st Doug Norval, � Richard d Belk 1JTEP 150 North Fit.,f'.AVentae f7epartniQht of Land Use And Transportation, Land Development Services DitMisioh Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 phone :5031648 -8761 V "0 (4.��..w...- ".......'i.. -.„A r «... 4..w:a .r «I..�r :.ami- .........r .�- ':.....�.x Tigard Planning Dept. City of Tigard 13125 S.YWi. Hall Blvd.:, Tigard, Oregon 97223 4. CPO 4-M & Steering Comm. Pat Whiting, Chair John Blomgren, Vice -- Chair November 26, 1990 Re Site Development review case file #90 -0022 Varience #90 -0033 In response to your request, for comment regarding SDR 90 -9022 and Varience request 90 --0033 as proposed by the Lincoln Eight Limited Par tnership /Trammell Crow Development Company, as the Community Particiapt;Lon Organizations in the Metzger area of Washington County at our November. 21, 1990 monthly meeting, CPO 4M reviewed, and discussed the application. It is our positon,,± ±hat the application is incomplete. There is a report' that claims traffic analysis. However, the report is inaccurate in that it claims traffic that would be generated by this additional office building would not affect the surrounding area. The area to the north, east and southeast is residential and would. be heavily impacted. The traffic study in fact does not analyze existing impacts nor projected traffic impacts on surrounding residential streets. The traffic impact to Greenburg and to Hall Blvd..not to mention Pacific ,Hwy (99) would be adding to existing griCt ook. This community has ,g47'gedar been heavily impacted by commuter through -- traffic traveling from and to the Lincoln -Center. HGratting a , r existing City of Tigard Comprehensive, deszgnatianon commerical building 'height g g limitation of 45 feet to a requested 90 foot height and allow ing aniaddtional parking lot for 614 more vehicles is not in keeping with uh p i g e City's efforts for a livable community. Tigard City voters just last May overwhelmingly rejected the President r s P&rkway by a X70 vote. Part of that opposition was to the projected influx of more ;'traffic problems „with which the city and surrounding areas, would have been faced. Therefore, CPO 4M is opposed to the granting of a varience for a" 'height .Increase and we are opposed to an a6ditional g g being approved untx.l the traffic: system bi�iid�,�r ��.�,td; gars e is corrected'o VE NOV 2 6 1990 CITY OF TIGARD PLAtINING O 14A C, o' .la .,........— ......M,i,. L..4..,.. ::..0 -A:�- ,..::li -; -..wax If you are considering approving this application, we are submitting the following recommendations to better facilitate not only the livability of the surrounding residential area but to facilitate those who are using the existing buildings in the Center. 1. A staff reference at the November NPO 8 meeting to consideration of removing the three turn -of- the - century Sequoia Gigantea trees to accommodate more traffic in the beautifully landscaped circle off Greenburg should not be part of this developmental consideration„ These three trees are natural landmarks and should not be removed. One is approximately 20 feet in circumference, the second one is 16 feet in circumberence, and the third tree is 14 1/2 feet in circumference. CPO''.4 -M strongly opposes any removal of these trees. We recommend that an arborist be employed to work in concert with the contractor at any time when there is disruption to the ground in the vicinity of any of the tlree Sequoia Giganteas/ A fourth giant tree was lost wne the Oak Street parking lot was constructed. We understand that this was unintentional, and we want all precautions taken to assure that this does not happen again. 2. Second, the present quality of natural light onto the site from the south and west would be greatly diminished by a multi-story building of five or more stories shading the y existing less high structures. recommend that the office We recorrune building and parking structure be reversed in location. This could allow for some additional excellent landscaping and aesthetically orientated artwork and walking area incorporated into the parking structure. 3 If the parking lot is being considered to be located adjacent to`S.W. Locust to the east, we recommend that the design element be similar to the existing garage on Locust and not be built like the garage on the Oak Street site. It is ` 'unattractive and quite an "eye score" to those who live i most una p ...,x. In addition, there should be a wider adjacent to the Coit1 le pedestrian meridian between Locus g g `_'... taane to d a. s request . ~ , i y the �ne or two �,evalk. the structure from the activity Of .he to and sidewalk to we request that the garage be limited t o meet the need of a 45 foot high building facility's business population. Ir 4 . We recommend that the City of Tigard's Comprehensive Plan building height limitation of 45 feet be applied to this. development Doubling this building size to accommodate the applicant's reference f "hardship" is not taking into conseration the hardship your office will be pulmigating onto the city and residential area's traffic problems. In conclusion, we are submitting our CPO 4-M recommend- ations to you and ask that you'also read the attached letters we have received from local residents regarding the subject proposal. Thank you for your considerations CPO 4-M & Steering Committee Pat Whiting, Chair crohn Blongren, Vice Chair, Tom Smith, Sec.-Tres. encl R Troy 'Vander. hoof , Nov. 21, 1990 Cenee Edgmont, Nov. 26, 19 9 0 10181 S.W. Jefferson Avenue Tigard, OR 97223-6616 November 21 1990 City of Tigard 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: File Title: Trammell Crow Company's proposed development application end variance request File No. Case files 14SOR 90 -0022 and 114.(90 -0033 Concerned members of the city staff`: I would like to open my comment by stating that I am totally againiat these requests being approved in any form what-so-ever. I : personally feel that our neighborhood has been subjected to as p - y handle given the existing Mauch development as it can a�ff ic.entl ha infrastructure, including the Greenberg Road interchange on 217. I would also like to state that I am a resident of the City of Tigard) as the recc d will show. I feel that we have already established a relationship with the City over ` the past year through the defeat of the president's Parkway issue and the returning of our neighborhood back to the resident's of the area. Also, I would like to state that it was my impression that when the City Council approved Lincoln Five they _stated that due to the traffic congestion in and around the Metzger area they would not allow any additional commerical development until such time that some infrastructure improvements were made. To the best:.' of :my knowledge there has not been any such improvements made and additional the g streets in this area can support any none of i.tae traffic, esPeciallY especially true when You take into consideration the saftey of the childern at Metzger Elementary, also located on Locust Street' only 1110th Of 0 mile f from this proposed, site However , having the full knowledge that things must progress, if the City feela that it cannot live without this additional commerical development then I Would ask you to consider along with the re uests of C'PO? !OA-Metzger re requirement to be fulfilled by the developer if it is ea I �! thse foll.tawin q y developer it :� � a .. � that Locust Street become a cul-de-sac when entered from Hall Blvd. in front of the Metzger school property and when from Greenberg Road entered � -� � it should be made to tie into the recently installed Lincoln Street. boing this would, allow the • and stay just that', t � surrounding residential commerical while funnelling the comm neighborhood to di rectly on and off. Greenberg Road which has been estabished as a commerical area. Rea ctrl; u l 1 Pat Whiting CPO 4 (Metzger) City of Tigard Planning Department Tigard City Council 13125 S. W. Hall Blvd. City of Tigard, Oregon _97223 Genee' M. Edgmont Proposed 7 Story Office Building. Proposed 614 stall parking garage. As a resident in the local community, a am oppossed to the building of the above mentioned office building and parking structure„ Was it not just a few short months ago when the Laajority of Tigard / Metzger voters emphatically said ':NO" to the City and the same developer who proposed the Presidents Parkway Master Plan development? Here we are revisiting the same Will the public officials never listen to the citizens in the communities i _ they supposedly serve? Master Plan development measure failed President Pa.rl� a iled for number of reasons. The single largest reason however was the overall] lack of consideration by this same national developer to the surrounding neighborhoods and their unwillingness to work with twee residents to address � ess h e proble ms . their d e rolo p .. rent w- o u ld . . c at «e . Pe ople feel very strongly n y about the inherent problems which accompany any additional l de �e op nei� in immediate area. You just can't shove something like down 'peoples' throats with misleading studies and fast talking pr oject managers with only one interest of profit in mind, It may rork in Texa `A le re this developer ca lls home, but not in Oregon, T he fact is this very developer recently � sol ei x Lincoln Center offic e leve10 e nt in question, wh re � this 7 story office building is to he c ohs cted' for Borne $ l � 0 Million to an international firm, This is in the interests of Oregonians? Of course the City of Tigard, Washington County or State officials don't necessarily Mind as h undreds of thousand' of dollars of tax revenues, development and permit fees, transfer taxes upon property sale and other personal benefits Which ac social and er5 !tonal Coz�i national developer d fix]. Working on behalf to get d _ p � of a g a _tonal development approved. just ask the Mayor of Tigard who has a ownership in rest in a restaurant in the Lincoln Center. More tenants mean more sandwiches sold mean more profits. Or ask our local state representative who based on a recent Oregonian article will re+Keive hundreds of 'thousands of dollars of fees associated with the above mentioned sale of Lincoln Center. It's an ugly circle and as a citizen paying taxes in the Tigard School District, I find it unacceptable. Homeowners are to knowledgeable today and when you try to desiro the ray, eeple giant li r you fr ht not onl the residents of the immediate ti wai hborhoods affected tut eer7„ttayer who have seen similar issues fimaori them h� similar �e�Y �1rI�ers filling similar series. I am personally not opposed to all development. Nor was I completely opposed to President Parkway. I am 'opposed however to getting things pushed through the system without addressing the real facts and concerns of those residents who are impacted negatively. With one of the biggest concerns being increased traffic through residential neighborhoods surrounding the existing and proposed development, let's look closer at the concern. September 1990 Transportation anal rs conducte d by Associated metro p � n Engineering and Planning (�,,T;�P) for the developer seems to Transportation think traffic generatP, I by their development stops its northbound trek at Hall Boulevard, It most certainly does not. Not questioning the integrity of ATEP, one realizes of course studies such as this can produce results, limit findings and direct narrative to those results desired by the party who commissions the report. Look at our nations' S&L crisis for example, For instance, one of the studies conclusions on page 27 states, "The development of the Lincoln Center property with an additional development will not have a significant impact to the surrounding street system ". With this single statement, ATEP's credibility is shot. These are Washington County's facts. 1. Washington ton Count conducts each year traffic "station counts ", Traffic r� on Oak Street near 80th alone, just one of the residential streets north .. e following of the development for e last five ears result in the counts. These are counts in a given 24 hour period" ■ ./ Traffic Eastbound 784 790 1205 794 _ 996 Westbound 713 738 1306 1746 1103 Total Cars 1497 1528 2511 1746 2099 P increase of 602 cars per day on just one The facts represent an xn��as residential street from 1986 to May of 1990. This is an increase of approximately 40.2 Z. This increase has occurred as the Lincoln Center development cars p►er day is not a ;lass continued expand. � r i 0 0 typical count in a residential neighborhood. 2. The peak periods, both morning and night, result in further startling facts. Traffic volumes between 7.30 am. and 8 :30 am. or 4 :34 pm to 0 5. � the 3 p. m are time people come to and from work at the subject development. For example, a typical 30 minute peak period in the immediate area where Washington County's studies were obtained resulted in the following: Full 24 hour day Peak Period, 5 :00 pm. to 5 :30 p.m, I a ' 1 9 o'wernber 21,E 19 # Cars 2,099 • Minutes 1,440 247 30 * Cars/ Minute 14.46 8.23 The numbers of cars increased 4 6 4 during peak hours on just one of the streets impacted by this development, This is one car eves 13 seconds. This is not a traffic count for a typical residential neighborhood, 3. The ATEP study itself conducted a survey of tenants at the Lincoln Development as to the direction and the street usage. Although the total number or respondents was just over 1,100, a fraction of the total number of tenants, the effort was made a nd e results state the Obvious. `The. and resorts rs of t e nur:nber .or .respondents, more tine ,) . dingy �1e1 born __ s tenani� 1 e center in the direction of the. surroun to the no ! a • d . d.4 + ! This traffic filters directly into the neighborhoods, The traffic does not stOp at Hail Blvd, as • the City of Tigard and the developer have implied since before President's Pa.rklAray was defeated to the current proposed development. This is more than any other single direction, including State Highway 217. This is a problem because bottom line, people ` look to the path of least resistance, and with the gridlock created by LAncoln Center to date at Greensburg and Highway 217 interchange, and the "parking lot like" conditions at peak hours on Highway 217 and High. y 99, these tenants seek alternative routes which unfortunately are the neighborhoods. 4. The issue of speed limits is a entirely separate matter, but little regard exists for posted speed limits as they are not enforced on a regular basis. Unfortunately, it will probably take a fatal accident of a innocent child before someone listens. For a fact, one such family is moving from the area specifically die to this very safety issue. Homeowners in our communities should not their homes because of the profits of a t, have to move from th national developer. Summation It's not necessarily the development itself that's the problem. It's more the lack of cooperation and desire of public officials and the developer in question to listen to the needs and concerns of those citizens to be negatively impacted by the continuing P y 'nuiug evelopilent If the infrastructure ' can't support the additional development today, don't try to force the issue down people throats by generating bogus report, or telling people what you think they want to hear such as the conclusion forementioned from the commissioned traffic study. It's not the truth. Talk to the people this � . impacts. Study the facts and their concerns and address the issues. FIX THE PROBLEMS FIRST, BEFORE YOU ADD TO THEM, just because Oregon is one of the only good commercial real estate markets in our country today, don't let the national developer's profit interest yesterday, override those � re . live onions lived � . _ ire who have lied ere esterda , ��0 live he today and will li T e here tomorrow. Let them go elsewhere and overbuild other markets for profits, care ans who � a but their . ro�its not at the cost Of Oregonians our quality of life: the recent have spoken parr. p��pl election on ... The o s oken once in n If the City of Tigard officials approves this development now, you can be assured it's not because the people wanted it this Way YI November 24, 1990 To the a igard City Counox As a resident: of the Hetzger community for the last fourteen years, I am definitely opposed to the application by Trammel Crow to build an 'additional seven story office building and three s'tor.y parking garage on S. W, Locust and S.W. Greenburg Road, x thought since the residen s of Tigard voted down Presidents Parkway in NAY this issue would be dropped, but 1; seen if hasn't, what does a community have to do to -stop this, developer? The comnrunity as a whole stated its °pinion> by saYing NO. WhY can't the City of Tigard back the community by saying NO too, instead of putting a dagger in 'their back and approving this development The Metzger cc)mn1unhty cannot h.and.ie the additional traffic flow into its backyard that this will create, The roads, SW Greenburg, SW' Hall Blvd, Highway 2:17 cannot sustain this congestion, Ti residents on the north s3±d'`, of Hall; on SW Oak, SW Locust, SW Pine have seen a dranatic increase of traffic from oars which make it very' unsafe for our children to play in their own yards, Everyone tries Ito take a shortcut into these office buildings and ,t make, it o dangerous for everyone, 1 travel, on SW Oak to take the neighborhood borhood. cMh i l lren to Fowler junior High School and can't even het onto Hall Blvd without waiting for the on sloughed of 30 to 50 ears turning from Hall Blvd to Oak to get to Lincoln Towers It is rid,i ul,ou , W); t wa 1 i happen with the increase of these additional oars`' I de n.d before you approve this development you ot""�ndu+ t your own traffic.) study and see ` tor Yourself if what a tie: it is, 1, 1,s, a, demo d that you, consider a traffic light to be put 1 on Hall Blvd and SW Oak o the traffic can flow better. Ct is gett ug more dangerous by the day t travel into our community. ' know the city .s putting traffic li ht on 6 Locust a.nrd, Greenburg and possibly putting a bank on be ;oorn.er too, 1 don't see hraw these e additions will help the traffic � + n t i sin °ther, When wt.L] the city o;f 'Tigard 'see :- ha °t this is nough. r ;evel.oplTle c,ormnunity to endure �xother °eas:on. 1 don' t want to see this � develo p ment ha yen b (, ,>v: 1 Y °ar�not c;r in t°�ehend the need ;o this additional office i� e ace, 1 know i t 'n ,deal location for development but why can't Ir�.� °o o ?i here e;l. e, pre°t•ty soot not one : will want to shop at washingt on are t_ ue;e they vron' t be able to get there through all t1'i oo .:nfu i.sr the of " .ce worlzers getting to work A; , it is 7'►0 , 1; don' t even ;-hop a °t Washington. Square . because 1 don 't like ha 1 ing t affiox I ►'o ; omewhere ei e , 'lease take these opinic3nt. i.nt:o n i .legation arid. vote NO for thi., additional tr , k? v'e . op nle xl' W On the e, 1 do not a1 ion, r" o see 'the titr, of Tigard aP1 aHe d by ).s.1,vis to be approved, •In,.._....xx.�rr,rl. want to see the wetlands preserved, Washington County needs on open spaces for its residents to enjoy. We are being bombarded by development everywhere we look, rie need open spares to go for a. walk to, to see wildlife and to enjoy the solitude ci nature, The TT'rUMISWOOD Girl Scouts are going to honored by receiving a f'ir'st place award on their Line efforts to clean up F .nno Greek, think the city of Tigard owe it to these girls and citizens -to preserve the wetlands instead of letting it be developed. I feel all their efforts will have be&n wasted if we don't do this for them These girls are our future, We need them to know that them will be something x,e t for them that is not endangered of being taken away, It is almost to the point where land is an endangered specie like the ,potted owl and the salmon in our rivers. Let's preserve something now which is needed and. valued, Don't let our girl. s and citizens down, SAVE THE WETLANDS AND DON'T. APPROVE TH LAND USE Ti FAVOR OP DP, , 'inoerelry /, Xrs, 4rIldY x .t w1e 10480 W 82nd xetzger Oregon g7, . { it f .�iJ. .1.1�r.. � � 1 1610 •ii�w �YLLf TELECOPIER COVER. LETTER TO 12,,a2 TELECOPIER 6TI°1°Y U 17UMBErR:- rwarar CONIZPA tX: +!art 1 :'"� r" t"`" DELIVER TO: IT. '1.40T*>oarn jai smoram F ROM dlrmOY' -- - IYILL/il NCO RfY MESSAGE p A._ R�:'L JJI T T MI:EIE . OF ?Ad.Es. DAT% OF TO. '1,%,Ci Sri1,w r.. VAX NINCEIER (5O2) 452. -6005 ,.. I +[`!�m'� +[��y � aj�'��r e_.�,�q{�,. �•v.�i+..wq+vwrwr+ +lw vi o$474, T FOR` TION a.ma.. 4 w".._....�.w._. .,...m .�. .� ( i`CLUDING 1118 PA,O k pig , ($(:4) lid ��C t ere ate any pY 'blC r with of Uezie pa ec: ii- ga . 7 :1. 1�IIw � M I••� C.,AlLIb1% ^ .t.Li g I1et• Sit it t0 .I v anV Y' 4d2-6008 Fdli.g.gt4.013) t2 s U I 601 QUO1A, ,wNr I W h }I WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON January 16, 1991 . Jerry Offer Tigard Planning Deparbnent P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 Re: LINCOLN EIS' Washington County has reviewed this proposal and traffic analysis and submits the following recommended conditions and comments: RECOMMENDATION . PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL/ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT Submit Plans, Eng'` ring Division approval, and obtain a facility `' an.� obtain Engineering permit for construction of the following public improvements 1. Construct the new Mapleleaf Drive entrance to include three exit lanes (two left turn lanes and one through/right lane) and a straight stacking area Provide all signal design, timing and lane striping " revisions at Greenburg Road. and Mapl eleaf Drive - necessary to accommodate this improvement. 2. provide 200 feet of two lane storage on the Locust Street westbound approach to Greenburg Road. These rovements Within SW Greenburg Road right-of-Way) shall be constructed in accordance with the requirements of the Washington County Uniform Road Improvement Design Standard s o . PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY The .. ro ad improvements required by condition A.1. and 2 . shall be complete and accepted by the County.; SW Greenburg Road' is a County minor arterial and is identified in the Washington County Transportation Plan as pert of the countywide Road System. it is the policy of Washington County to retain jurisdiction of countywide roads, and to ensure that these facilities maintain their function of /roving large volumes of traffic. Department of Land Use and Transportation,' Land Development Services Division 050 -1 155 NoNorth First Avenue Hillsboro, Oregon , 97124 Phone: 508/648 -6761 FAX: 1-503/693-4412 17 County analysis of the Lincoln Eight proposal indicates that SW Greexiburg Road can operate at an acceptable level of service if the recommended improvements above are installed. The analysis also makes clear that traffic on SW Greenburg Road is nea „ a a Point wh ere the level of rvice will be unacceptable. Although this project does not yet "crush" the system, the County would like to Point out that traffic growth in the Greenburg Road area is of serious publiic, concern, and, should be of concern to the property owners of this area ; County staff is aware of the potential for further intense development by other property owners in this area This potential future development plus the continued e lion of the Lincoln Center site leads the County to believe that it is in the best interests of both the private and public sectors to participate in an area wide traf f tc management study. Washington County recommends that the Lincoln Center property owners participate with other major interests,' both public and private, along SW Greenbu:rg load in an area wide study of future traffic demands, problems, and necessary improvements. These parties '' should then participate at an appropriate level to rnutigate the identified traffic problems. The County feels it is in ` the best long term interest ' of Lincoln meter and other property owners in this area to participate in an effort such as this Washington ton County stands ready to participate ' in such a process and devote its resources as necessary and capable. Bruce Warner, Director Joe Grillo, Land Development Manager Doug lorva) , Traffic Analyst 1.01/14 14 10 i 45 'x"50 '3- 293 -9409 TRAMMELL PDX Post Office Box 5396 Portland, Oregon 07228 10250 SW Grbenbur9 Road Portland, Oregon 97223 503/245.9400 Mr. Jerry Offer Development Review ;, Planner City `'of!1 Tigard 13125 S 1, Hail Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Linooln Center Dear J'err'y, The following is the information You requested for your report. Keep in Lind there could be a degree of variance with previous information ` (as we dielcussed) d Area of entire Lincoln Center project: 22.09 acres' otal number of parking spaces 2489 Total square footage of buildings 710,377 Should you have any questions or need more information, do not JtitIsitata to ` Contact me . SitIcerelY0 ELL' CROW MP ANY Ann Pa CreSwell ssistant Proje 4 Director Post.fr btand tex trarlsrrrlttal memo Airl # Of plie s FROM: ENGG TO: 503 684 7297 WASHTNGTOW Inter Correspondence TO Scott King, Transportation FROM Doug Norval, Pb rs , Traffic: SUBJECT: TRAFFIC STAFF REPORT LINCOLN CENTER (CITY OF TIGARD) Planner Analyst 45W/ SAN 4, 1991 2:52PM #966 F 02 U NTY Date Jan. 48 1991 This report examines the traffic impacts of the proposed 140,000 square foot general office building. Recommendations are developed to ensure an adequate level of traffic safety as defined by R &D 86-95. A traffic Access, Report, "Transportation Analysis for Lincoln Center, Tigard, Oregon', Associated Transportation Engineering & Planning (ATEP), September, 1990, was submitted for this development, supplemental information requested by Washington County was provided by ATEP in a memo dated November 29, 1990, . The findings and recommendations given below are based, in part, on information provided in this traffic study, FINDINGS: 1. Impact area, based on l0%o increase in average daily traffic, described below, Link nm Greenburg Road Locust St Locust street Greenberg Rd Oak Street Greenberg Rd IA Mapl el eaf Dr. Hall Blvd Hall Blvd 1S Intersections within the impact area were analyzed (AM and PM peak hour) with the following results; Intersection Loa Greenburg Rd at Locust St Gree iburg Rd at Map el eaf Dr D Refuge Y.ant No No sPi No No with the new signal being installed Oh Greenberg Road at Locust Street., this intersection i s projected to operate at LOS 5 under . total traffic. On Locust Street, the signal plans indicate two westbound approach +� dch 1 anes (left only and right ani y) , striped for a distance of 100 feet from the crosswalk at Greenburg Road, Analysis of total traffic with this devei oprnent indicates a storage length of 200 feet per lane is needed w 1A A F„ OM : ENGG LINCOLN CENTER January 4, 1991 Page 2 :1 TO: 503 694 7297 JAN 4, 1991 2 53PM #k866 P. 03 4. Interconnection of the existing signal on Greenburg Road at Mapl el eaf Drive with the new signal on Greenburg at Locust is planned as part of the signal installation project. Site traffic from this development necessitates the need for construction of a new entrance to the Lincoln Center development at Mapl el eat' Drive, with three exit lanes and a straight stacking area Analysis further indicates the need for revised signal phasing and striping to accommodate this development, 200 feet of three -lane storage (two left turn lanes and one through /right lane) 3s needed at the Mapleleaf westbound approach to the signal. , Storage queues South of the Greenburc/Mapl el eaf signal were examined to determine whether northbound Greenburg southbound ., Road traffic would backup to the Hwy, 217 ramp signals, and w Mound traffic at the Hwy 217 ramp signals woul d backup to the Map ; ei eaf signal and impact its operation. Calculations indicate that under total traffic levels with this development, the northbound queue on Greenburg Road does not appear to extend into the northerly Hwy, 217 ramp signal, and the southbound queue from the Hwy, 217 ramp signals does not appear to extend into the rlapl el eaf intersection, The available storage distance i s marginally acceptable in both cases, Therefore traffic from this development does not appear to push congestion levels over acceptable safety limits at this time, Additional improvements, such as an additional southbound through lane on the Greenburg Road structure across Hwy. 217, will be needed in the near future, however, because further traffic growth will push traffic demand volumes over capacity, signal son on Greenburg Road between Locust Street and Progression the �, Mapl el oaf Drive i s acceptable under total traffic with the proposed development, RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Construct new Mapleleaf Drive entrance to include three exit lanes (two left r3 straight turn `!ones and ono through /right 1 any► and a stry stacking area Provide 200 feet per lane storage capacity Provide all signal design, timing and lane striping revisions at Greenburg Road and Mapl el eaf Drive necessary to accommodate and optimize this improvement. 2. Provide 200 feet of two -lane storage on the Locust Street westbound approach to Greenburg Road ON cc: Jerry Offer City of Tigard • November 29, 1990 Mr. Scott King, Tr ?,nsp_ortation Planner Washington C .unty 150 N. F' Avenue' oro, OR 97124 RE: SDR 90 -0022/ LINCOLN CENTER PEMOPLIMING ti 1990 SOCIATED ANSPORTATION GINEER INC & ANNING (ATEP) (503) 636 -9232 (503) 743-4401 Dear Mr. King: This letter is in response to your November 20, 1990 letter requesting additional information the above name project. rrrtt�on for q g a onfo Let me resp your let ne o and to the additional information request in the outline p letter as follows: 1. Existing ADT'S on all impacted links. Since ADT'S matching the current m , • ' is Figure p peak of the are not available, the ADT's shown on the attached F� ure � are extrapolations m peak hour. This assumption is based on hose counts taken on Mapleleaf east eft p p g during preparation the September report or, . this project showing rPen ur Road durmn the .re aratron ref p J that the pm peak hour to be approximately 8.8 percent of the ADT 2. ITE trip generation rates. In most instances, the use of ITE trip generation p g rates would be used in the preparation of this type of report. Early in the preparation of the ATER report �� p project, �. r '� traffic counts taken at the time that the existing office complex DID � �t was found from � g NOT generate the same number of trips that the AVERAGE ITE rates said it should. Based on this information controlled trip generation study was conducted The numbers used in the sdevelopment and contro Y report are actual, not AVERAGES: Center traffic irripaet, of the Lincoln C The basis of any traffic report iis its accuracy, so' why should AVERAGES be used than the dual data. E in its re Port I'ri Generation'' 4th Edition, pag , gr " i I�' R p e iii papa raph 2 j` indicates "Local data should be collected for comparison when considering use of the data in this report 4O40 DOUGLAS WAY LAKE QsWEGO, P.0, BOX 13185 SALEM, OR 97309 (503) 636 -9232 (503) 743 -4491 The trip generation study conducted for this report reflects the "Local" condition and supports the assumption that this development does not generate the number of trips per 1,000 square feet that ITE says it should. Using ITE rates will only over estimate and exaggerate the actual impact of this development. Use of rates other than ITE trips has been allowed in the past by your department and this practice should continue since it reflects the actual rather than the nationwide average. 3. AM analysis was not included since the volumes of traffic shown in previous reports on this development are significantly lower during the AM peak hour and as can be seen in Table 1 all of these intersections operate at level of service C or better. See Figures N B,C and D. Table 1 - Future Level of Service at Critical Intersections The southbound Greenburg 4. and lane to �r g Road. In reviewing the capacity calculations sheets Y Appendix D, Scenario 2 Levels of Service Calculations please notice that the located in radix A e � �c �e ce calculations for new development did not include the additional lane. level ofsei �. They g p e existing signal timing. The footnote in only mitigation used was optimization of the 8, Page 21 of the original report is in error and should read '*** timing optimization. 5. During the analysis of Lincoln V, a coordinated system was proposed and accepted by Washington County and the City of Tigard connecting Mapleleaf and Locust Street . traffic signals. ODOT refused to allow the ramps to and from Hwy 217 to be included in the connected to the system. The values shown Table 2 represent the findings of the Passerli - 87 analysis conducted for this request and are included as an appendix to this memo. Table 2 - STACKING DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS reenburg Road Locust Avenue Greenburg Road Vlapleleaf* reenburg Road./' ramp 217 ** aU 2 p 50 2 3i5 based on progression stem installed for Locust and plele rote ec4 ens. } isolated signal pest o x o y not interconnected er Greenburg Road sign, cc: David 131 e, Trammell Crow eft Linen, City of Tigard Chris Davies, City of Tigard Joe Grillo, Land Development Manager Doug Norval, Traffic Analyst 127 LOCUST AVE 11X (621 0) { 4-100) EXTRAPOLATED ADT'5) Xl - LINK PERGENTA &E 0.-80 NCOKTH. 000 MAFLELEAF n®c 3 NORTH MAPLELEAF (BEST,'SDLN) TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS AND PUBLIC TRANSF2RTATIDN PASSE 11 -87 MULTIPHASE ARTERIAL PROGRESSION - 145101 VEF' 1,0 JUL 8 ¢ * +1- BEST SOLUTION,.:. NEMA F'HASE DEEIGNATICN * * ** ITT, 1 .0 SEC OFFSET AT ST PHASE 5E0 IS DUAL THRUS (246)' LOCUST tP X OFFSET CROSS ST PHASE SE( IS LT 3 LEANS (3 +8) ARTERIAL STREET CROSS STREET CONCURRENT PHASES 2 +6 1 +E. 1 +5 TOTAL 3 +8 4 +E 4 +7 TOTAL PHASE TIME (SECS} 66.17 15.3 .8 86.0 34'.8 .0 .0 34,0 PHASE TIME (%1 55.6 1E.1 0 71.7 20.3 .0 .0 28.3 -- - -' MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS PHASE (NEMA) 5(5) 6 1[SI 2 3(5) 4 7[ I 8 PHASE DIRECTION NBLTPR S6THRU SELTPR_NBTHRJ WBLTF"F'EBT'RU EBLTPF,' WBTHRU PHASE TIME (SEC) .0 86.0 15,3 66.7 24.2 .0 .0 ' 34.0 V /C-RATI3 .00 .45 30 .31 .52 .00 r88 ,42 LEVEL OF SERVICE A A w ' A A DELAY '(SECS VEr, 4.3 48.8 13.E 3:.: ,C .L 31,1 LEVEL OF EE'PV'IGc' A D E' I, C QUEUE (VEH'LANE) ,0 ,7 ,S 2.1 2,2 .0 ,8 1,7 STOPS tSTOPSIHR) 0. 160. 58. 264, 165. 0. 0. 150. TOTAL INTERSECTION DELAY M1n'IM'M DELAY CYCLE 16.8 SET'S /VEH 35 SECS (BEST,SOLN)' PASSER 11-87 TEXAS DEPArTMENT OF HIGHWAYS AND PUELIC TRANSPORTATION MULTIPHASE ARTERIAL PROGRESSION - 145101 VER 1,0 _JUL 88 * *H+ BEST S0LI�TLON CONIINUED....:NEMA PHASE" DESIGNATION , * +i s ** INT. 2 117.7,SEC OFFSET, ART ST PHASE SEQ. 1S DUAL'LEFTS (1 +E) MAPLELEAF 98.1 Z OFFSET CROSS ST PHASE SETAE DUAL LEFTS' t24,) ARTERIAL STREET CPOSS STREET CONCURRENT PHASES 1 +5 2 +5 2 +6 TOTAL S41 4 +7 4 +8 TOTAL PHASE TIME (SECS) ,,10,.'0 21,1' 44,1 75,2.: 18, 0. 2.3 24.5 44.8 PHASE TIME (1,) 6.3 17,E 36, 8 82.7 15, 2' 1.5; 28, 4 37.3 --- ---- - - - -- MEASURES or EFFEC' REf ;E3S PHASE (NEMA' OCEI' 6 1['5I 2 3(5) 4 7(5) 8 �rE " 'ECT!O1t 18.J 'P SPTHRU S6LTPR NPTHRU WSLTPR EPTHRU EBLTPR NPTHRU 1. r . '`ir. (SET) 21,1 44.1 10.0 E,E,5 6. 2 2 (� q 11:, C� "�. S 22.., �.4, 5 �. ��r'�'ji �� i 6 i4�. ,18 i4' 17 57.4 1.1 .1� „iE LE .l , 0 SEhi‘' .rE F I' A F C E A e �+rN' 1 ',,,t:,,',;',1.,-", r1 r yr r rj 1.,L- 37,5 i.:f6 42'.4 4,!.',. it 5 . 35.>J LEVEL Or'!SE� .'T� :E D C t' Fr C O� D r��yt,al rya �. er^ . A 44x51 . H l � �. i, 6i ., 1 `-. a y t �i 5 ETtP'E iCYF,_' '.:' M,t ["5 , r� St r,kk i• y 0„, 3! ,. ti 28`1 14wr 4" 48. 41, t 7, F. � .. __ , i 2' .wi Fr , (BES1. SOLP1) PASSER 11-8 TEXAS DEPAFTMENT OF HIGHWAYS A ?.r F'1.191.1C TFANEFOPTATION MULTIPHASE ARTERIAL F'P5G:'E4SIO ?; - 14518: VER 1.8 JUL 98 *4+4 PASSEF -87 BEET PROGRESSION SOLUTION SUMMARY 4'" " 'H INT. I .0 SEC OFFSET ART ST PHASE 8E0 IS DUAL THPJS, (2 +6) NBND,217 RAM .��X OFFSET CROSS ST PHASE SED IS LT 3 LEADS (3 +8) CONCURRENT PHASES PHASE TIME (SE5) PHASE TIME (Y.) PHASE `(1•;EMA` PHASE DIRETI2' PHASE TIME (SEC) V' 'RATIO LEVEL OF SERVICE DELAY (SET'S /VEH) LEVEL E` VI' E QUEUE (VEH.'LA';E) STOPS (STOPS/HR) • ta• ARTERIAL STREET 2 +E 2 +5 ' 1 +5 TOTAL 40,7 21.5 .0 62.2 42+7 '21.5 .8 62.2 MEASIivES OF 5E5] F 1[5) 2 NBLTPP SBTHPU SELTC'R ?;FTHC1. 21.5. > 40.7 .0 62.2 .81 .83 .00 .60 I' CROSS STREET 3 +0 4 +9 4+7 TOTAL 37.8 .0 .0 37,8 37.9 .0 .9 37.9 EFFECTIVENESS - r -w•- 8C..) 7IE) B WFLTPp EBTHR'y.J ESLTPR W9TH ,'t' 87.8 +' .0 37,8 .5E ; .91' .08 .82 D A A D 4`.i:9 27.7 .9 II., 23,E .0 9 32,4 r 1c F c c 3.3 8.2' .01 21 1. .0 . 4.6 2E4µt . ♦i j� h � �� hh �hj ,y , 920 10. r.µ. i 1. 1. li `E a.' TOTAL INTER'CEc r Let. DE, 4 Y ,Fy . - - 11 `I i r. ♦ i.. 1.L.1 SE;E'VE, i� 7E SECS N 2. '1 24, w P (BEST .SOW TEh.`S PEFAFTfE,NT OF HICHP,AYS AND PUfLPC, TFMsPCF;TATII!; PASSER II-87 MHLTIPHASE ARTERIAL PROGRESSION - 1;5 2 E 1 +�L1 „ ,.F 1,0 JUL 03 #1+# I ASEEP-97 Et 1T GF;QrFEESIOt, SL- :!TIES; SUNt:APY ##fif 4f} INT. 1 „0 SEC OFFSET ART ST PHASE SEC :S Sl: RAMF 211 0 X OFFSET CROSS ST PHASE SEO IS LT 7 LEADS. COtICURRENT PHASES PHASE TIME (SECS) PHASE TIME (X) PHASE (N'E11A' PHASE DIRECTION FHAEE TIME (SEC) Vi[—RATIO LEVEL OY SERVICE DrLA,:a 'SECS'VER LEVEL Or SERVICE QUEUE kVEH /LANEJJ ARTERIAL STREET CROSS STREET 246 1 +6 1¢5 TCTAL 4 +7 4 +8 349 TOTAL 3 X 9 25.1 .0 60.0 40.0 .0 .0 40,0 24.9 25.1 .0 60.2 40. ME •0l_ `CS 1[ ASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS — 5 6 53 2 3C�7 4 7C"] 9 N ?LTPR SSTHRU SSLTPR NSTHc1► i51 .68 .68 NELTr, F, , e 60i O 25w i �4i u EETHpU EI�LTPR WPiHRL' .00 `� 40,0 4E,0 , /� ( .2 i00 . i56 -i4u .02 E Fi. p 27,1 32,4 26.5 7.0 4.2 51! 8, b11 44f =IF 1zv1 TOTAL I,NTEk1SE: TIO,N OE,'Ar' ��Iw r'trti tt A. 59F 20.S C' 412 1,7 ,7 ��fi Li ,:L, 2041 r: � �4 N SECS NARR.ANTY DEED Granted and recorded to correct scrivener's error in misidentification of grantee in warranty deed dated the 27th day of June, 1990, Recorder's' Fee No 90- 34484, recorded June 27, 1990. New West Federal Savings and Loan Association, Grantor, conveys and warrants to Lincoln Eight Limited Partnership, Grantee, the following described real property free of encumbrances except as specifically set forth herein situated in Washington County, Oregon, to wit: See Exhibit "A." The said property is free from encumbrances except those exceptions set forth co Exhibit "B ", attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. The true consideration for this conveyance is $2,300,000.00, together with other good and valuable consideration, g is requested, the Until a change i a re nested, all tax statements shall be 1t�260t�S.W, following address: Lincoln Eight Limited Partnership, Greenburg Road, Portland, Oregon 97223. THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING rEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT j,0 VERIFY APPROVED USES, Dated this 1 of 1990. New West: Federal Savings and Loan Association By its: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. County of San Joaquin set. 7 , 1990 Personally. appeared the above name n vice ce re_ of New west _ Federal Savings and Loan Association, and acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be its voluntary OFFICIAL Sri ROS iLIE V. PHELPS ✓` r:�- NOTARY RiAUC • CALIFORNIA / `.a �' . - .:.L I" -tq. PI SAN JOACUIN COUNTY ,..___ ---+ �; California .. �,� ��, ��i Oct os t, ��q� No , r.� Public i � for :R �C"' .�*c• :-,« ,,,,,,pvm..0;,,,, � � .' '` i .w + i )/,‘/)' ..: Div �orri�'ii � � �n Expo res EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE REAL PROPERTY The land referred to in this Agreement is situated in the State of Oregon, County of Washington and is described as follows A tract of land being part of Block 9, all of Blocks ,10 and 11, Part of Blocks 12, 13 and 14, also that part of vacated S.W. Maple Leaf Street and vacated S.'W. Hayes, S.14. Garfield and S.W. Grant, TOWN OF I.IETZGER, in the Northeast one- c,uarter and Northwest cane -- garter of Section 35, Township 1 South, Range 1 lest, Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon, more particularly described as follows BEGINNING at the Northwest corner of Block 11, TOWN OF METZGER, a duly recorded plat said Northwest corner being the intersection of the South line of S.W. Locust Street and the East lane of Creenburg Road; thence North 89 degrees 30i East along the North and the east litre of Greenburg road; thence North 89 degrees 30' East along the North line of. Block 11, 10 and 9 (along the South lane of S.14. Locust Street) , a distance of 406.50 feet to a point on the North line of Block 9 thence South 0 degrees 301 East 369.00 feet, thence on a curve to the right 114.86 feet having a radius of 112.00 'feet of which the long chord beam South 28 degrees 52' a 46" West 109.89 feet to a point of compound curve; thence on a curve to the right 149.88 feet having a radius of 134.68 feet of which the long chord bears North 89 degrees 50' 251' West 142.26 feet, thence North 57 degrees 56' 23."' 1,1est 58.48 feet to a point of non - tangent curve, thence on a curve to the right 141.3"/ feet having a radius of 45,00 feet of which the long chard bears 1$ orth 57 degrees 561 21" West 74.99 feet, the,Oce on a curve to the left 73.82 feet having a radius of 3,29. 90 feet of which the long chord bears 74 degrees' 13' 11" West 72.83 feet, thence South 89 degrees w3 0 'Nest 41.79 feet to a point on the East �r. line of Greeriburg road ; thence North 14 degrees 14' East 336.15 feet to the point of begirining. EXCEPT that part of Lots 1, 2, 3e 4, 5 and 6, Block 11�, and street w��.en�t��reeur5 and 6, Block 1 M n for 3, 4, ; � a , taken g Road) Washington COuntY Book of Records Doo. ent 78-50827. a:. „Kk EXHIBIT g ▪ Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public record; proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. • Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which would be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. Easements or claims of easement, not shown by the public records reservations or exceptions in patents or in acts authorizing the issuance thereof, water r ghts, claims or title to water: Any lien, or right to a 1,i en for services,' labor or material': heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in urea, encroachments or any other facts which a correct survey would di sclose. ., 1990.91 taxes, a lien in an amount to be determined, but not yet, payable. 7. City liens, if any, of the City of Tigard4 8. Regulations, including the power to acquire rights of ways and easements, of the Unified Sewerage Agency. 9, An easement created by instrument, including the terms and Provisions thereof, Dated November 27, 1978 Recorded : November 29, 1978 Recorders Fee No. ; 78052367 In favor of Northwest Natural Gas Company, an Oregon Corp: For : Pipeline and appurtenances Location : Over the Southerly portion 10. Easements for existing public utilities in vacated street area reserved by Order No. 78 -232 and the conditions imposed by said Order No. 78 --282 Dated :'October 7, 1978 Recorded : January 2, 1979 Recorder's; Fee No . 79000127 1 'hp 11. An easement thereof, Dated Recorded Recorder-`s Fee In favor of For Location created by instrument, including the terms and provisions November 7, 1978 November 27, 1978 No 78051783 Unified Sewerage Agency of Washington County Sewer Over the Southerly portion 12. An easement created by instrument, includivlg the terms and provisions thereof, Dated September 10, 1979 Recorded September 11, 1979 Recorder's Fee No. : 79037015 In favor of For Location The County of Washington Traffic control f a c i l i t i e s Over the Southeasterly portion 13, Covenants, conditions, restrictions and easements, including the terms and provisions thereof, as contained in Memorandum of Real Estate Agreement, Dated : November 2, 1979 Recorded November 7, 1979 Recorder's Fee No 79045910 Amendment, Dated Recorded Recorder : December 30, 1982 December 30, 1982 s Fee No 82034219 14. Ordinance 90-07, including the terms and provisions thereof, Recorded A April 18 1990 Recorder's Fee No. 90 -18982 Affects Adopting The President's Parkway Development Plano U A, Crr OF TIGAREJ, OREGON SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639 -4171' 1. GENERAL INFORMATION PROPERTY ADDRESS /LQCATION" i,O2S0 c.W. Greenbur -i-tg rr1.. Oraanri ,_�_L22.3 TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO., Lallao tot #1000 SITE SIZE G.. 2 a r 3 PROPERTY OWNER /DEED HOLDER.' Road n FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO. OTHER CASE NO'S: RECEIPT NO APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: DATE: Application elements submitted: (A) Application form (1) (B) Owner's signature /written authorization (C) Title transfer instrument (l (D) Assessor's map (1) (E) Plot plan (pre -app checklist; (F) Applicant's statement (pre-,app checklist) (G) List of property owners and addresses within 250 feet (1) Lincoln Eight Ltd. Partne ship ADDRESS ;NCO s .,W, ;rPenb,.tmg„__ 56)HONE 245-9400 CITY Tigard, OR ZIP q7971 APPLICANT* ADDRESS CITY 71nrnln i ht t.iz i - n ishi.p 5 are HONE ZIP *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a leasee in possession ossession with'written, authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner with written authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the'space provided on page two or sub mit a written authorization with this application,. 2. PROPOSAL SU t,LA.R:Y The owners of record of the subject property request site development review .approval to allor :7' -Cnn t-'=.0 t-i oll s'F . J -5tnr r (H) Filing fee (, (I) Construction Cost Estimate DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE: FI NAL DECISION DEADLINE: COMP. PLAN /ZONE DESIGNATION. N «P . O Number Approval Date: Final Appriral Date: Planning • List any variance, conditional use sensitive lands, or other land Ito be considered as part of this application: Ha•i ht var; ar,ge use actions • Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments " n sheet at the time you submit _ this applicataon�n the attached �.nformatio • THE APPLICANTS) Si►,ALL CERTIFY THAT . The above .request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the agplicatior_, including the policies and criteria and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application.; DATED this 70t-h day o rP'pterribar 19 90 SIGNATURES of each owner (egp husband and wife) of the subject property. SLrpm /0524p ipt SEE MAP IS 1 35BA %p± � NY • Sat rn .4-: n. ismrr +a...4:�.- u..,iL.1.r...nLn »Yw 23 -81 M A Y • Ci3.Z0�5b 50 50 50 50 60' 1000 406-50 4.,52 AC, Ia 90.36 4 3 2 l 2 111.60 124,65 4 13780 87.80 1.00,9`.) 0 6 I 114,10 5 7 _ to 3 C� 100 '3> 7,2 ,S, 64 AC, =/ 4 1U3:55 11 ,7C1 12 81.'; 7 ,2 VAS r,TCl) R/L 81 =,166 ,Cc F. 12� -f 50 5t) 5(-5--1 50 l ise 12 .!•1 12 900 1,67 Ac 4 3 o w Li.. I min r� -- ' e Jr" Cry 50 50, 50 - - 5.0 VACATED R /0 79-127 4 •,:LIB �4. 10 F., I 5 1 F, may, tC 6E, SG 50 1 of -4- 12 r R:134 6Cr 6 • 1 ,.5 i r 0 w V vt,EATEG lfia;, 1 /4/.1,, olio r ,50 327 12 11 .per D -r i, 1263 0 e 7 8 cn 1002 4c, 50 r0'' 4 10 VACt,1`E C, R/0 78 50 5CJ 50 N I0 5 12 3, 0 2 /roc. J Y'1 G `p`ej 89°G57 "E 26011 12 212.7 ru .340C) 321.'1C If? 8 9 I0 284 996 a I(y J Ir ,.IL,��",, jr X1.7 I00 ( 100 4,22 Cfi9 1 a tl MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Ed Murphy, Community Development Director FROM: Cathy Wheati it DATE: February 1, 1991 SUBJECT: Appeal of SDR 90-0022; Variance VAR 90 -0033; Lincoln VIII Partners Attached is a cc. y of an appeal received today for the above- referenced Director's Decision. Mr. J. Randy Kyte filed the appeal and said he would be sending a more detailed letter on the grounds � for appeal on Monday, February 4. Kyte asks Mr. date that he be notified as soon as possible advising him of the date e the appeal hearing before the Planning Commission. Jerry Offer with " th original appeal document for file) ' �?f THE LINCOLN BUILDING LINCOLN EIGHT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP TABLE OF CONTENTS Project Team List Application with Authorized Signature Title Transfer Instrument Assessor's Map Site Plans Applicant's Statement (Project Description) a. Development Schedule 10. Materials Description c. Specific Materials - Application Checklist Variance Requests and Narratives Construction Budget Exhibit List Transportation Analysis M i . • PROJECT TEAM OWNER/APPLICANT: Lincoln Eight Limited Partnership 10250 S.W. Greenburg Road, Suite 300 Portland, Oregon 97223 Contact: David Rl ,,ke ARCHITECT: STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS: KEEP Consulting Engineers 421 S.W. Sixth Avenue Portland, Oregon 97204 IngrimiMills /Mart ndale, P,,C: 10200 S.W. iGr. e ' nburg Road, Suite 200 Portland, Ore'gr;yn 97223 Contact: Bart Mills ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERS: LANDSCAPE CONSULTANT Danes and Moore 1220 S. T: Morrison Portland, Oregon 97201 Northwest Landscape Industries, Inc. ti EXHIBIT T A EXHIBIT B. EXHIBIT C EXHIBIT O EXHIBIT E EXHIBIT F: o- E BrIS PRESENTED: DRAWINGS_ AND GRAPHICS EXISTING BUILDING SITE AND VICINITY MAP (Alta Survey) ASSESSOR'S MAP PROPOSED SITE PLAN PROPOSED TYPICAL FLOOR PLANS PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATIONS PROPOSED LANDSCAPING DRAWINGS ■ • Lincoln Eight Limited Partnership proposes to construct a seven story, 140,000 square foot office building, and a three level parking garage to be located adjacent to the existing Lincoln Center Buildings, to the east of Washington Square. The proposed building will be sited within an existing parking lot directly west of the e .dsting Lincoln Building, and is bordered on the north by Locust Street, north and west of Mapleleaf Street, north of One Lincoln Center, and west of Greenburg Road. As the subject building displaces existing parking, there is a proposed three level parking garage to the north of the _building, Development Schedule Construction 1991 with c of the proposed rnidrise building is anticipated to begin in March ompletion expected by November 1991. Materials The building will be a post tensioned concrete structure clad in brick panels of similar color, and common materials of the surrounding Lincoln Center Buildings, The window system will be solar gray glazing set in anodized aluminum frames, similar to systems currently employed on Lincoln Tower and Lincoln Five. The accompanying parking garage will be of concrete in structure with brick infill panels, similar to the existing parking garage supporting Lincoln Tower and Lincoln Five u SPECIFIC MATERIALS: Application Checklist A. SITE INFORMATION (15 copies) Vicir Map - A vicinity map has been provided as part of submitted Exhibi . a, referenced Large Scale Drawings (per Section 18.102 of development Code). ▪ Site Size and Dimensions - Reference to Exhibit C Drawing will define site and proposed building. Site Features - Reference to Exhibit C Drawing will, define site and proposed building. Location of Existing Structures and Their Use On the immediate existing properties, there have been constructed three midrise structures, one highrise structure, one lowrise structure and three parking garages. All adjacent buildings to the east and south of the proposed project are commercial buildings. To the north and welt of the proposed project are smaller commercial buildings and retail structures. Reference to Exhibit A for a complete profile of existing Immediate Uses, The zoning surrounding the site is as follows: North, South, C -P, East, C -P, West, C -G. See Exhibit A. • Location of Existing Utilities and Easements 1. Refer to Exhibit A. Recorded Easements Noted As: Unified Agency, Sewage enc g g y, #78051783, 11/27/7 Northwest Natural Gas, #78052367, 11/30/78 Ingress/Egress,, #7845910, 11/7/79 Amended #82034219, 12/30/82 Amended #87049414, 9/29/87 Reciprocal Easement, #860261.0L 1/18/86' • Location of ]Existing Dedicated Right-Of-Ways L. Standard conditions as subject to rights of the public in streets, roads, and highways, No other such dedications were found in the Title reviet,s. f • SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS (15 copies) • Proposed Site and Surrounding Properties: Refer to Assessor's maps, Exhibit B, included herein, and Exhibit C of this submission for a graphic overview of proposed site. • Location, Dimensions and Names of all: Existing and platted streets and other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining properties: Refer to Exhibit A as submitted. . Refer to 'exhibit A for location and dimensions of: a. Entrances and exits on site b. Parking and circulation areas c. Loading and services areas d. Pedestrian and bicycle circulation e. Outdoor common areas f. Above- ground utilities • Refer to Exhibit A for location, dimensions 4 'ad setbacks of a. Existing Perrnanent Structures b. Proposed structures . Storm Drainage Facilities (Submitted Separately) 5. Sanitary Sewer Facilities (Submitted Separately) Areas to be Landscaped - Reference to Exhibit F ]raying Location and Typ e of Outdoor Lighting i - ( Submit ted Separately) 9. Mailbox Location - N.A. 10. Location of All Structures and Their Orientation - Refer to Exhibit Drawing A and C for a graphic representation of all existing and proposed buildings on the site with their orientation (per Section 18.64 of Development Code). ARC i`l1EC URAL DRAWINGS (6 copies I. Floor Plans (wit h Square e Foot ages) es � �e f e Reference e to Exhibit hibit L Drawing. Building Elevations Reference to Exhibit E Drawing, • Irrigation Plan (Submitted Separately) ▪ Description of fences, buffers & screenings - Reference ` to Exhibit Drawing. ▪ Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials, - Reference to Exhibit F Drawing. ▪ Erosion Control Narrative (Submitted Separately • SIGN DRAWINGS ( Submitted Separately) TRAFFIC REPORT (8 copies) ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE APPLICATION - Height 'Variance The Request Supporting Narrative ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE APPLICATION ICATION - Parking Size Variance 1. The Request 2. Supporting Narrative REQUEST FOR AN ATMINISTRATPV E VARIANCE TO THE _HEIGHT CODE Request of an administrative variance to the height li-ni3`ations (Chapter 18.98 of the Development Codes). Suinmazy of Co ,dition and Reason for Request, Lincoln Center consists currently of six buildings: Lincoln 1, 2, and 3 buildings are midrise structures of 5 and 6 stories ascending to heights of 15 feet to 80 feet. L.inc or? h. 4, a highrise structure of 12 stories ascends to a height from grade to top of parapet a pp roximatel y 153 feet, Lincoln 5 is a 7 story highrise ascending to a height of 92 feet and the Lincoln Building, a three story building ascending to a height of 44 feet. Pursuant to Chapter 18.98, Section 18.98.020 of the Development Code, it states that "Any building located in a non - residential zone may be built to a maximum height of 75 feet, provided 1. The total floor area of the building does not exceed 1 to 1 -1/2 the area of the site; 2. The yard dimensions in each case are equal to at least 1/2 of the building height of the principal structure; 3. The structure is not abutting a residential zoning district. The current zoning of the proposed building site is C -P Professional/Administrative Office Commercial District, The extent in the majority of existing surrounding zone are C -P and C-G (General Commercial District). Within the C -P designated zone (Chapter 8.64 of the Development Code, Section r�{ 8 "except i . i �► Chapter 18 98 no building in AVC the C-P �. provided in � ,' 18.64.050, Subsection 4, e�cce t as otherwise, rc�vided zoning district shall exceed 45 feet in height". It is, our intent that it be shown that special and unusual circumstances related to the subject site, the literal interpretation of the provisions of the applicable zone would cause rY hip owner from the full development potential an undue or unnecessary hards��;i to hold the o� of his property (per ORD. 89-06; ORD., 83 -52). The granting of a height variance to 92 feet for the ro osed building, will allow like use P p pursuant to existing adjacent buildings as described above. By granting the proposed height variance, it is not going to materially be detrimental to the purpose of Chapter 18, nor be in conflict with the policies of the comprehensive plan, or to any other applicable policies and standards, or to other properties in the same L:- 1 zoning or vicinity. By granting this height variance, it will allow parody with existing structures displaying similar heights. The variance will not single out a singular property; but will rather allow The Lincoln Building to experience the same qualities, densities, and heights as the rest of Lincoln Center, where the average height of the existing 6 buildings is 97 feet from grade to the top of the parapet. The granting of the requested variance is the minimum variance necessary to effect the desired and required architectural fabric of the surrounding area There exists in addition an established precedence with the overall site, and is consistent with other such requests. Lastly, by granting the proposed variance, the resultant use will be the same as permitted under this Title and City Standards and will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible, while permitting some economic use of the land. In conclusion, the hardship is not self-imposed, and the 'variance" requested is the P P � q: minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. V ! r REQUEST FOR AN ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE TO TIM E COMPACT PARKING SIZE Request of an administrative variance to the size of compact parkin g spaces. aces. Previous experience in the operation of the existing . hases of Lincoln Center shows that the size of compact spaces allows an efficient site design 1 n both in terms of fun c: i g function of the parking facility and in the 'availability of adequate area for landscaping. The continuation of this design will provide an appropriate number of spaces while maintaining an acceptable overall parking facility.' Section 18.134.050 of the City Development Code provides several criteria, which must met by a proposed variance. t The total site development proposal must P be viewed P g design n � as an integrated deli n fox a thorough evaluation with respect to Code purposed ,;Maid Plan polich.. Generally, it is the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and the Development Code to provide for office The de environment cc� ive to business, as well as compatible with adjacent areas. uses in an ez�vlro . decision with respect to the design x�e p parking dei is the result of a complex analysis of many factors, this project to establish a high quality coin atible rail intent of tnl , , q Y Y is the ova p with its surroundings, which is also the : purpose of the development code. The proposed variance to the City's will � s co ed b compact parking space allow the phases standards established the first five ace size will all and which of the design :stars y p yes of Lincoln Center, which would be allowed under the applicable County zoning. This proposal, therefore, explicitly eets Criteria 2 since this design P � � align necessary to allow the sixth phase to be coin feted in a manner is necess P anner com ar Standard comparable with the earlier phases. The proposed office building and associated building parking are allowed by the. CP zone, The intensity of the development is consistent with the existing development of the first five phases of the project as well as with the CP zone. The proposed parking design criteria have functioned adequately q tely on the existing five phases of Lincoln Center, and no adverse effects o properties . n adjacent properties have been identified. An inspection of the existing parking area shown that it is appropriate, aesthetically P leasing and functionally thereby indicating that � }� continuation meets Criteria 4 of Section 18.134.050 of the City 'Development Code The hardship in this case is specifically related to the ability of this site to be developed in a manner cornatensurate with adjacent properties, while providing adequate parking � P cited g � P g ca ing. No personal circumstances are cited' as the basis for the hardshi �.nd lands P II 0 ' 0 SUMMARY: This proposed Development Review and Variance package has been prepared after a thorough analysis of the various factors that determine floor area, footprint and building height. The proposal has been found to be both economically feasible and consistent with the character of the existing development in the area The Variance criteria, as addressed above, are met by the proposal when the project is viewed as an integrated package. TO: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: October 16 1990 FROM: Tigard Planning Department IRE: SITE, DEVELOPMENT 'REVIEW SDR 90 -0022 VARIANCE VAR 90 -0033 LINCOLN EIGHT (NPO #8) A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a seven story, 140,000 square foot office building, and a three level parking garage. Also requested is a Variance approval to allow for increased building height to approximately 90 feet whereas the Development Code allows a maximum, building height of 45 feet, and a " reduction in the size of parking stalls. ZONE: C -P (Commercial Professional) LOCATION: 10250 SW Greenburg Road (WCTM 1S1 35AB, tax lot 1000) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From informatio n supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information to our staff, report and recommendation will be available prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. You application, y c onto ' by 26, If ou 1990. w Y u t may comment ��the� space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable a respond by the above _date„. please phone the staff contact with your comments and confirm your of f contact. noted belc�-,w w comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639. 4171. STAFF CONTACT: Keith Liden PLEASE CHECK THB FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY pr p objections to it We hav ob ec, e rep lowed the ro Deal and have .�►o Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written' Comments:„ Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: blot /SDR90 -22 . Bpi .-... ..: �.a. .•a. .i �, a.a.....:r- A ;'..:... ,v »a ..µr- ........r,.. .L. ... ....,...w .,.....1..;J...`'._.x.Jwr .....•..:: .- }.,_.,r.. .,n..JTJ. .ar,...i;.::.. -r:r.. r:.w�+. .u,r .. xnl r.,,a....l.w . SA- .....✓.... +..,u. -Wnr MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO Ron Pomeroy, Assistant Planner January 22, 1991 FROM: Chris Davies, Development Review Engineer. RE: SUR 90 -0022 LINCOLN EIGHT Description: The applicant proposes the addition of a seven (7) story,, 140,000 square foot office building and a three level parking garage. The site 'is located on the southeast corner of S.W. ' Greenburg Road and S.W. Locust Street Findinas: 1. Storm Water ) The seven story office structure will be constructed over an area that consist mainly of parking spaces and sidewalks, therefore the increase in storm drainage in this area will be negligible. The three story parking structure will 1 he constructed over an existing parking lot area, therefore this also should not increase the storm drainage in this area. The storm drainage is proposed to be, collected in the existing system. The impact, if any, should be evaluated to insure the if any, discharge will not impact that i�he increased. storm drainage d:�se the properties downstream. The entire drainage basin for this storm drainage system should be evaluated to insure that, with ultimate development, the existing storm drainage system will provide adequate capacity. B) The 'Inified Sewerage Agency has established' and the City has agreed, to enforce, (resolution No. 90 -43) Surface Water Management Regulations requiring the construction of on site water quality facilities or fees in lieu of their Construction. Requiring 'surface water qu alit y facilities numerous �acil�.ties on small siteS ::would result in Hume facilities that would become a maintenance burL. an to the City. Furthermore, the applicant has not proposed any such facilities and there are no natural depressions or other areas of this site that are particularly suitable for water quality facilities, Regional facilities, funded by fees in lieu of construction of these facilities, would provide the required treatment with. improved and an `- S maintenance. Consequently a fee-in-lieu of the .construction of on -site water rel�.a a.1i�.y quality facilities should be assessed.. It appears that adequate sanitary sewer facilities eU,ist to provide service to the seven story office ';structure ENGINEERING COMMENTS LINCOLN EIGHT SDR 90 -0022 PAGE 1 Streets /Traffic A) Access to the site is provided by S.W. Greenburg Road (Washington County road) and S.W. Locust Street (City of Tigard). The submitted site plan for Lincoln Eight and the parking structure (3 story) shows two accesses onto S.W. Locust Street; one of which is a shared access; plus the S.W. Greenburg Road intersection with the private drive (Mapleleaf_ Drive). S.W. Locust Street is a mayor collector street. The intersection of Locust /Greenburg streets is currently under construction to signalize the intersection and to channelize S.W. Locust St. The improvements are scheduled to be completed by the end of February 1991. The current channelization Plans call for separate right /left turn lanes westbound on S.W. Locust and one eastbound lane; with plans for 100 feet of storage for the turn lanes. The accesses to S.W. Locust Sty, from the parking garage, are approximately 250 feet apart from centerline, to centerline. The access points are also approximately 185 feet and 435 feet from ' S.W, Greenburg Road. Based on the centerline.. to centerline of findings from:Washington,County, they are recommending that the storage Capacity- be increased to 200 feet for the turn lanes. Therefore the applicant should be required to work with the Engineering Department to locate the access points for the parking structure at the most advantageous Point. S.W. Greenburg Rd provides access to the site from Greenburg onto Locust and the Private drive. As part of the improvements being completed on the Locust /Greenberg intersection the left turn lanes for both access points are being improved as far as channelization markings but with no additional. storage Capacity. The traffic study submitted estimates the vehicle trips generated by the additions to this site to be approximately 995 trips per daY. The study recommends the following: A) Construction's of a now entrance to the Lincoln Center, development at Mapieleaf Drive with three exit lanes and a straight stacking area. 2) The development work with Tri-Met to add a bus stop internally to the site along Mapleleaf brive, 3) The development- implement a car - vanpool service for the site, The service would match interested employees with others in the development for. joint ridership. 4) The development designate convenient parking areas for car and vanpool participant. ENGINEERING COMMENTS - LINCOLN BIGHT' $DR 90 - 0022 PAGE 2 rl After extensive review, Washington County has determined that the traffic impacts to Greenburg Road can be accepted if the proposed improvements are made to the Mapleleaf entrance road. Additional striping changes will also be required on the Locust Street approach to Greenburg Road. We accept and support the County's analysis. There will also be an increase in traffic to the east of the site on Locust Street; however, traffic volumes on Locust are expected to remain well within the traffic capacity of the recently improved street. Washington County has established and the City has agreed to enforce, (Resolution No. 90 -65) Traffic Impact Fees. The purpose of the fee is to ensure that new development contributes to extra - capacity transportation improvements needed to accommodate additional traffic generated by such development. The applicant shall be required to pay the fee. Based on the following � TIF this the ESTIMATED .CIF for is development would be: Use as defined by applicant: General Office 140,000 square foot 2) Land Use Category: Office 3) Rate Per Trip: $24.00 4) ITE Category 712 5) Weekday average trip rate: 12.40 per T.G.S.F. 6) TIF = 12.40 X 140 X $124.00 = $215,264 00 7) NOTE: The applicant has indicated in the preliminary plans that it is their intention to remove an existing one story building, Therefore the aforementioned TIF would be adjusted to reflect this change in use; there would be a reduction based on size and use. PLEASE NOTE THIS ,IS ONLY AN ESTIMATE OF THE PROPOSED TIF FEE, . TI-IE ACTUAL FEE WILL BE CALCULATED AT TIME OF BUILDING PEPMIT APPLICATION, The actual TIF will be based on the actual building area shown in the FINAL APPROVED DESIGN and the trip rate in effect at the time of building permit application. RcCOmmendat ion: A. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A SITE 'WORK PERMIT: 1. Sanitary sewer and storm drainage details and calculations shall be provided as part of the site improvement plans, Calculations shall be based on full development of the serviceable area. The location and capacity of existing, ENGINEERING COMMENTS LINCOLN EIGHT SDR 90 -0022 PAGE qk: proposed, and future lines shall be addressed. Designs and calculations submitted shall be stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer licensed to practice in the State of Oregon. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Control Plans Technical Guidance Handbook, November 1989." PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A'BUILDING PERMIT: 3. The applicant shall comply with Washington County requirements; submit plans,` obtain Engineering Division approval, and obtain a facility permit for construction of the following public improvements: A) Construct the new Mapleleaf Drive entrance to include three exit lanes (Two left turn lanes and one through /right turn lane) and a straight stacking area. Provide all signal`', design, timing, and lane striping revisions at Greenburg Road and Mapleleaf Drive necessary to accommodate this improvement. B) Provide 200 feet of two lane storage on the Locust Street westbound approach to Greenburg Road. These improvements (within S.W. Greenburg Road right -of -way) shall be constructed in accordance with the requirements of the Washington County Uniform Road Improvement Design Standards. �f A joint use and maintenance agreement shall be, executed and recorded. on City standard, forms for all common driveways. The agreement shall be referenced on and become part of all applicable parcel deeds. The agreement shall be approved by the Engineering Department prior to recording. The, app llcant shall demonstrate that storm drainage runoff can be discharged into the existing drainageways without significantly impacting propert es downstream. The applicants shall demonstrate ,thatr they have legal authorization to construct the required revisions to the private approach to Greenburg Road. e Mapleleaf Street appro The proposed accessed to the parking garage on to S.W. Locust Street shall be evaluated to determine 'the best location to avoid conflicting turning movements and sight distances. The location of the accesses shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permits The applicant shall submit to the City of Tigard Engineering Department two sets of plans, of sufficient scale, which detail the existing and proposed (final approved site plan) site conditions with particular attention being paid to the nNGINEERI,NG COMMENTS LINCOLN EIGHT SDR 90 --0022 PAGE 4 impervious area In addition calculations shall also be submitted which determine the amount of impervious surface area for pre and post development. The applicant shall submit to the City, of Tigard Engineering Department one set of approved building plans (floor plans only) for the existing structure which is to be removed and for the proposed seven story structure. Calculations shall also be Provided as to the total square footage of each building. In addition, for the existin g building, the applicant shall submit ,a statement which detail its existing use 10. The applicant shall demonstrate that sufficient parking, for the existing businesses and visitors, is available during the construction of the proposed development. . DURING CONSTRUCTION: 11. No construction shall be allowed to take place between the hours of 9 :00 p.m. and 7 :00 a.m. 12 All construction materials shall be stored on- site. 13 The applicant shall ensure that off- street parking be provided for all construction - related vehicles and trailers. 14. The applicant shall ensure that flagmen be provided when construction vehicles are blocking public streets. 15. During construction of the site improvements, the construction traffic shall access the area from S.W. Greenburg Road and Locust Street west of 3rd Avenue only. Construction traffic shall not use Oak Street to access the site Construction traffic shall not use 'Locust Street east of 93rd Avenue to access the site. All vehicles and construction -- related, equipment shall be parked on the site No vehicles shall be allowed to park on S.W. Oak, S.W. Locust Streets or S.W. 93rd Avenue which' are related to the construction of the subject improvements including employees, subcontractors, material deliveries, etc. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY: 16. The improvements to S.W. , Greenburg Road, S.W. Locust, and the Mapleleaf Drive entrance shall be approved and accepted by Washington County and the City of Tigard: APPR.Ov8D ea/81)1190 22 , C1tb Randall R. Wooley, pity Engineer ENGINEERING COMMENTS - '` LINCOLN EIGHT egiit SDR 90 -0022 PAGE 5 7 TO: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS C." DATE: October ' 16 1990 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 90. -0022 VARIANCE VAR 90-0033 LINCOLN qu Development Review approval to allow EIGHT (NPO #8) A request for Site e construction of a seven story, 140,000 square foot office buil aging, and a three level parking "garage. Also requested is a Variance approval to allow for increased building height to approximately 90 feet whereas the Community Develop ment Goo de a�lowi a maximum building h fight of 45 feet, and a reduction in the size of parking`. stalls. ZONE: C -P (Commercial Professional) LOCATION: 10250 SW Greenburg Road (WCTM 1S1 35AB, tax lot 1000) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If You comment on this application, we need your comments by Oct. ?6,' 1990.�u` w You ma y use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. I f ou are unable . to respond by the above _ .date lease phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO; Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -411. STAFF CONTACT Keith Liden PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. , Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments:_ Name of Person C:ommentizag phone Number: bkm/s0R90_22 . BRM tr LEIV ,D PLANNING OCT 2 9 1990 a NOTE TO THE FILE FROM: i r�, r.' tv 4 •�:.` FILE: c�. SATE a TO: REQUEST FOR COTS PROM: Tigard Planning Department DATE: October ' -16 • 1990 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR '90-0022 VARIANCE VAR 90 -0033 LINCOLN EIGHT (NPO ; #8) A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a seven story, 140,000 square foot office building, and a three level parking garage. Also requested is a Variance approval to allow for increased building height to approximately 90 feet whereas the Community Development' Code allows a maximum building height of 45 feet, and a reduction in the size of parking stalls. ZONE: C -P (Commercial Professional) LOCATION: 10250 SW Greenburg Road (WCTM 1S1 35AB, tax lot 1000) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's states information supplied by various departments any information available to our staff, a report prepared and a decision Will be rendered on the If you wish to comment on this application, we ne+ 1990. You may use the ,space Provided below or return' our comments. mments. If 'you are unable 'to res o: phone the staff contact noted below with your comments ,in writing as soon as possible. If you 1 this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Departmc Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Keith Liden PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE AND BEAVERTON li(IRE DEPARTMENT GENE BIRCHILL Deputy Fire Marshall Plans Examiner 533 - 526.2502 FAX 526 -2538 4755 S.W. Griffith Drive ^ Beaverton, Oregon 97005 We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to its Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter, Written Comments :, Name of Person Commenting TJ �-�� ` �/`L �-} Phone Number: bkm,SDR90 —"2;2 . BKM 1 TO REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: October 16 1990 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 90 -0022 VARIANCE VAR 90 -0033 LINCOLN EIGHT (NPO #8) A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a seven story, 140,000 square foot office building, and a three level , parking garage. Also requested is a Variance approval to allow for increased building height to approximately 90 feet whereas the Community Development Code alla.is a maximum building height of 45 feet, and a reduction in the size of parking stalls. ZONE :, C -P (Commercial Professional) LOCATIONt 10250 SW Oreenburg Road (WCTM 1S1 35AB, tax lot 1000) Attachtad is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your , review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and -'a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. you If y wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Oct. 26, 1990® You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to You return your comments. If you are unable to r on�d b2y the above date please phone below with confirm comments in writing noted bel your comments and co your g s soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: Keith Lidert PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.! Please' contact of our office. '-----Please` refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Name of Person Commenting Phone Number: �' .•' bkm/ DR90 -.22. BKM SDR90 a0022, VAR90 -0033 The conditions of approval should require that the owner conform with the following: o No storage of materials on City streets. Keep junk piles away from view of streets. o ordinance of start and stop times of construction: Monday - Friday No work from 9pm to lam Saturday . No work from 9pm to Sam Sunday No work from 9pm to gam o A protective fence and canopy shall be required prior to start of construction, as specified in UBC chapter 44, along SW Greenburg Rd, SW Maple Leaf St, SW Locust St, and in areas around the proposed building and parking structure where the public will have access. o The owner should, be required to show how parking will be provided for the construction workers. The owner should not be allowed to use public streets for this purpose (along SW Oak, SW Locust, SW 93rd and SW Greenburg Rd) o Construction vehicles should not be allowed to block city streets while waiting to make deliveries (i.e, co ncrete trucks, etc...). Construction vehicles should only he allowed to access the site from SW Locust off SW Greenburg Rd BUILDING DIVISION „ PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION FILE NO: SDR 90-0022 / VAR g0 -0033 FILE TITLE; LINCOLN EIGHT APPLICANT: LINCOLN EIGHT LTD. PTRS 10260 SW GREENBURO ROAD #750 TIGARD, OR 97223 OWNER:, SAME REQUEST: - Applicant requests Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a seven story, 140,000 square foot office building, and a three level parking garage. Applicant also requests variance; approval to allow for increased building height to approximately 90 feet whereas the Community Development Code allows a maximum building height of 45 feet, and a reduction in the size of parking stalls: LOCATION: 10250 SW Greenberg Road (WCTM 151 35AB, tax lot 1000) ZONING DESIGNATION: C -P (Commercial Professional) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial Professional NPO NO: CHAIRPERSON: Marilyn Hartzell PHONE: 245-6299 +,X STAFF DECISION PLANNING COMMISSION DATE HEARINGS OFFICER DATE CITY COUNCIL DATE TIME TIME TIME X REQUEST FOR COMMENTS (dee attached list) RETURN BY / ATTACHMENTS: X VICINITY MAP X LANDSCAPING PLAN X. NARRATIVE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN X SITE PLAN, STAFF CONTACT' PERSON: Keith Liden PREPARE FOR PLANNER APPROVAL: XADVERTISEMENT -� TIMES /, /_ OREGONIAN NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS TO BE MAILED / / � .__. LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE OF APPLICATION / / .^. NOTICE TO DLCD _ - ATTACHMENTS: TO: REQUEST FOR COMMENT S DATE: October 16 1990 FROM: Tigard Planning ,Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 90-0022 VARIANCE VAR 90-0033 LINCOLN EIGHT (NPO #8) A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a seven story, 140,000 square foot office building, and a three level parking garage. Also requested is a Variance approval to allow for increased building iaaight to approximately 90 feet whereas the Community Development Code allows a maximum' building height of 45 feet, and a reduction in the size of parking stalls. ZONE: C-P (Commercial Professional) LOCATION: (WCTM 1S1 35AB, tax lot 10250 'SW Greenburg Road W 1000) Attached is the Site 'Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments , and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a zeport and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future - If PP s by Oct. 26 26 this a licata.on, we need your comments If You wish to c�:mment on letter to 199�t�. You may use the s ace Provided below or attach a y p p se orate 1. return your comments. If you are unable'to respondbv the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with ' your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If , you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO` Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639- 4171. STAFF CONTACT: Keith Liden PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. of our office. Pleaae contact Please refer to the enclosed letter. _1./../f Written Comments 4' (LA OR Name `of Perkin Commenting: L"), Phone Number: bkm/SDR90 -22 . BKM i rrwrw+"�.Y wiwYwY�wv 4MwM� �vM4.w 4.4 • IT SST FOR COMMENTS TO: outrs, +� l t---1C DATE: October 16 1990 '"FROM: Tigard Planning' Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT' REVIEW SDR 90 -0022 VARIANCE VAR 90 --0033 LINCOLN EIGHT D A NPO #S re est for Site Development, Review , approval to allow coraetruction, of'. a seven story, 140,000 square foot office building, and a three level, parking garage.• Also requested is a Variance approval to allow for inoreasecLbu ilding height to approximately 90" feet whereas the Community Development Code allows a maximum building height of 45 feet, and a reduction in the size of :parking stalls. ZONE: C -.P (Commercial Professional) • � g ( 1S1' 35AB, tax lot LOCATION. 1Q2�O S�7 ,Greenbur Road WCTh'�! 1000' Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From infcrmat; o pp y various departments and ..agencies and 'from other information available to ou �,.:� uu Lied b vary our staff a xe information r port and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. Xf, you wish to comment on this application, we need your coa rents by Oct. 26,r 1990- You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. 2f you are unable to respond.bv the above date please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments Hand confirm !your comments writing as soon as passible. If' you have any questions',regarding in ws i.t 'this matter, Contact the Tigard PlannJ,ng Department, PO; Box 23397, 13125 SW • Hall Blvd. , Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -41/1. STAFF CONTACTS ..Keith Liden ...... PLEASE CHECK. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY e We have reviewed the propoOal and have no objections to it. lease cont act of our Office'. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments Name of Person Commenting -.1 t'°.1 - ‘ e -cto Phone Number: (1436 bkm /SDR90- 22.BK.M OCT 22 199 CITY OF HH ARD PLANNING bEPt • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO: i ' /f A( re-.1)(4k-1 � FROM: Tigard Planning Department ' I DATE: October 16 1990 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 90 -0022 VARIANCE VAR 90 -0033 LINCOLN EIGHT (NPO ' #8) A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a seven story, 140,000 square foot office building, and a three level parking garage. Also requested is a Variance approval to allow for increased building height to approximately 90 feet whereas the Community Development Code allows a maximum building height of 45 feet, and a reduction in the size of parking stalls. ZONE: C -P (Commercial Professional) LOCATION: 1.0150 >SW Greenburg Road (WCTM 181 35AB, tax lot 1000)I Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report information available po and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will ' be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your caste by Oct 26, 1990. You may use the space provided below or attac}, a separate letter to return your comments. If you l aria unable, to restaond bl_ the above date please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If ` you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning A his � g g Department,. PO Box 2397,`13125 SW Hail Blvd., Tigard, OR 97 223. PHONE: 639- 4171„ STAFF CONTACT: Keith Liden PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have p p no objections ,.�.._ Please contact.�.�. of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments:. Name of Person. Commenting:' Phone Number: bkm /8DR90 -,22 .I T Y OCi 22 1990 cur?' (* 1 ICiAlip PLANNING bEP r, u.. ' 00 09/27 15 :33 tr503- 293 -9409 TRAMMELL PDX • Trammell CroCon p n I:I PAZ COVER EMT DATE: Z ? -- Please deliver the fallowing pa c8 I DXATELY to 77)' L 1001 11'• M111, H.N1.1Y11/AI4,14,40,1.W.. 16....414,Ir1A!'S. Y.I V,.:...J .... .L.....I' Post Office Box 5396 Portland, Oregon 97228 TIME: NAME FIRM; CITY: FROM: CONDOM'S s N1. .11 eet IA7�IYwllf�r Y�nwr�LYrrlsa�gi1�1r1;A ../ ..may 10260 SW Greenburg Road Portland, Oregon 97223 503/245 -940Q P (503) 293 0409 ...qunm•o11M1 ToTAL t11113ER PAaES, Tmmi aaas COVE R smEE°I'. IF YOU DT)) NOT C IVE ALL PAGE$0 PLEA8E CALL (503) 245'9460- y 1.NM 1.(I.F /j'Lrw` tow NIROSES e` NW 1/4 E I/4 SECTION 23 -81 35 TIS RI WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON SCALE I "= tO0' SEE MAP IS I 26 ©C !Ag ivvi !I /iv i47 if, iifiiiii {r �i riail�iiilTiiisiii i,,...,,,,,,,,,,,,y),, - , J,,fq /,,4',,i ,,f :i ii /iiii si a /7'4' .i -iI beO'Y/ '�` ' �' fill ii „ii iii r. BEGIN. CR:75_3 ° (C,R. 753 = 5:20 So ; 30 go _ as 5a 5a 50 50 ��s0 50 50 50 550 5a a �5. 1000; �06:5Q' 327.98' 3C� 25 50 50 I E ( �ti0 1339.25 t I � 339.42 32'AG: t 1.67 t ! 2.04 Ac. o Q 4 2 ° 0 E c J 111.5x: N 14 • ;:`1 ` . J 12 ° ( lax tt S q i Q Ni ih� �2.�� L� Y)t �3 i ice+ � j , Ii. r v��- m . it)1�.:..:.I i 12 O.I. ( �_ � - - "' N i.Y.i loo 5 , 124.6 L' a- o i .-. a :-.1..0_,0 ° tad 3 a••.r • `' t :. ��, It: —1-. �,I� ... I° 6 I 21 �,... ;° 6 —� of E 137$0 �!• U �- . \----/I E 4 8 •`> U• +-a' O U. ri /azsso4 ` d > >�ar•�: 1,.. -�- 4''r!e° ti1.59 I 129.31 " 5 [ i x 7 0 7 8 Itst [Q 8 9 IC3 �i 45 7 8 s 272.2 _• !Iv', 100.94S 6 I I I t 1,,,, 1002 I i I��R 7 114:10 50 50 50 50 50 I. 7`�Au. t� I 90 r-a VACATED I`c /0' 73 -127 ? VACATED R/0 78 -232 Q f ICO N N 166.93 73 8� ii '° ° 10�3.?*� n °� 3i! = 50 I r 50 30 30 50 50 sa 50 i aM n : 6 Ss�Si ♦� 118 188.78 3 co �564AC'.: 2jw ° i I `74.50 N ss© 1' 21" ¢' Q 1 3 i'vl 4'a a 34.38 p0° q8 E. V • e,3 t X40 l° I° I $I �o 4 �. I �f > I 4 E ,�' t 4- o ; ,..% I! i.b .9.134 .60 �i :!!O• I' - 01110.00 L" iPIAP.a SID 2 36 31003" S 4,r6„,11,0 _. 564AC.` s2i Fo. -4 VACATED 90.40 103:55 118 188.78 N 89° 31 Z1" € 34.36= 169.65 lz 21 1.2 -4 •l° �- N 89° 30' 57" L S.- s 62' 26011 I iCil (43" 8- 0 °I I2 8 9 14.15j; _4_ ! 100 ._ _4 25 5 _ 100 100 4 50 0 w — 3 • §, i _ .ffi .:i � i It AT -80 21653 / : f . riti ,.% :;f,.�// f�jlf�- ��7: % f� f//%l ifff� rfT% /.ff % f. 100' 100 . I f 100 284.96 � 10a� D _Eats F7J _ • p r .,� ' i / o f 7,50 100 100 422: CHS. I I 10 I 7 10 0. 1 9 °I 12 1 $ _ � .,. , x793 9 88' 100 —° — 6 0_ 203 05 —' !� 9 � s `•j. 4.22 CrIS. 7,50 N 89 22' 15'8.48 1'00 €0.50 178'' 75.03 100 85 926 75 75 3302 .22 AC 75 3303 .22 AC. 72.45: N 89° 34` E` 341.65 ..: 84-4243T CIRCULA7.T. �� JH 1<1.. JO Staff Review CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PRE -- APPLICATION CHECKLIST Date Anew r /? ?# I led (3,1e., ].. APPLICANT i< / Pi Al 'ry _. .►, iGr 2. PROPERTY LOCATION Address ,rt L U iil 'r" 'Of Zoe:Ate,' f ,r+ Ai Tax Ma /Tax Lot .' /COO 31 PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION /NECESSARY APPLICATION (S' o Wit,,. eve/ orifil__11?viet t I )(e, ' 71i9_,..A1:12g,e2L1.2 1)4;6, e/ /0 Iri. etm.of, 71t) red't, a u' G GoL,. awn , 0 i 'emu» is 1 "` R a" ' i ` 4.C.7''' nd , " �." ` •.. _. ' sJ Existing V6,0,C4Cf Adjacent Property north 1't .i.ap C , < '' I , � R + w H�!.' �l` b f,.. e4, • COMPREHENSIVE', PLAN DESIGNATION )" r' °w; 1 , .,u/ 44to " 4..../... • ZONING DESZPNATIOyn� dj 'W yy WMii �r p if • NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNxNG ORG+ NIZATION NO i r ,4 �. CiAZRPERSOftl �"� � �� ,. ‘ PHONE • CODE REQUIREMEN`T'S Minimum lot size /width i o,t , w coi"ner s xde t,-eAr Special p ial se `"backs: streets e st��ished areas lower tnten4ty hones' wetlands flag lot �. g accessory structures �". � zero lot line Mak Yisiia m lot ai�o Maximum building height Special height limits Density calculation Density transition flag lot other all Lv 61,2.4 .z-414f4-iire Landscaping: minimUm % of lot area Street Trees,r Buffer Areas Parking Areas Visual clearance 441c_ 41`44611d' idi (' PC An 41 V Parking and loading Access and circulation ,a t..r 10, p 40' 7 Signs . OTHER CONSIDERATIONS (See application checklist for specific items) Sensitive lands: •floodplain drainageway — >25% slope, Wetlands Open space Historic overlay ` P. nectiofs /.bikeways Street xm ro�ements /can Right—of—way dedication Sanitary Sewer improvement 4 !' +' d 1. p.! 0. 11 ,3 Storm Sewer am proven nts ..�..�. Improvement- Agreement -- Permit; Bonds; Pees Other agency permits 10. PROCEDURE e Adm�.nxstratal►e staff r u Yew Public Hearing /Hearings Officer".. Public Hearing/Planning Commission The Administrative decision or Public Hearing shall occur approximately 30 days after a complete application is filed, A .40- -day appeal ' period follows all decisions, (a573P/0022P) lt4 CIT`l OF TIG(RD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST µ Staff Date The items on the checklist below at• • ' • required for the .successful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application, This sheet MUST be brought and submitted with all other materials at the timo you submit your application. See your application for further explanation of these items or cal P1 nning at 639 -4171. BASIC MATERIALS ITEMS TO BE INCLUDED: A) Application form (1 copy) L 13) Owner's s ignature /written authorization L C) Title transfer a .nstrurent [ 0) (assessor's map [ E) Plot or site plan C F) Applicant' $ 'statement r_ (C »1 s-t —a ,� erpeRr l + +u ,~r ;" "°& ark bras" "TArr htr 'B'O (' di, . „' [ J (H) 'Filing fee ($4 L tJ sp c i 'Ic MATERIALS A) Site information shnwa nc (1110 cf copies , w) [ ] 1) Vicinity Map [,.,I"'' 2 site size & dimensions L,-.4.-- 3) Contour lines (2 ft at 0.1O% o►^ 1 ft for grades > 10 %) [ ] 4) Drainage Patterns, courses, and ponds L 3 5) Locations of natural. hazard areas including: a) Eloodpldi.n areas [ b) Siopes in ev'cess of 25% L 3 c) Unstable,, ground [ 3 d) Areas with high seasonal 'water table [ 'J e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential L ;J f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils L ocation of resource areas as 'sh Comprehensive I._ `' 'I on the shown Map inventory i.nclud.ing a. Wildlife ;habitats L b) Wetlands L 3 i Other site futures: ou .. a) t Rock c rop inr s L'3 C p �l b) 'Tree with 6" + caliper measured . 4 feet From ground level L b) location of existing structures aid their uses I. 9) Location and type of on and off -site noise sources L J 10) Location of existing utilities and easements [, 11.) Location of existing dedicated right-of-ways � , 1„� 13) :3ite bevelopment Plan showing (No of copies _ ) [ i ), The proposed site, and surrounlinw propert:ie ['" 2) Contour line intervals C1=4"''''''' 3) Theilocation, dimensions txrid names of k11: r a) Luis;ting & platted streets & other public ways and easements 011 the site and on adjoining L properties APPLICATION CHECkLI8T •- Page 1 J b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements on the site, c;) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension The location and dimension of: a) Entrances and exits on the site b) Parking and circulation area c) Loading and services areas d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation e) Outdoor common areas, f) Above ground utilities The location, dimensions & setback distances of all:' a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site b.) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site 6) Storm drainage facilities and i i a' V" "f u owes i. ►° : m "ctnd Io n 7) Sanitary sewer facilities 8) The location of areas to be landscaped 9) The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques 10) The location of mailboxes 11) The location of all structures and their orientation 12) Existing, or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements C) Cradiric l (No, of copies The site development parr shall 'include ,a grading pla n eat the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1) The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating general contour lines, slope ratios and soil stabilization proposals, and limo of year it is proposed to be done, 2) A statement from a registered 'engineer supported by data factual substantiating a) Subsurface exploration a o geotechnical engineering report b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposals c) That ail problems will be mitigated and how they will be Mitigated 0)' Archi.tecturall Drawings' (No, of copies , ) : The site development plan proposal shall include: 1) Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures proposed for use on— site S and,,' 2) Typical elevation' drawings of each structure„ E) l.ar►Hfs gay Plar (No of copies �. "f'he landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site anaiysis plan or `a ,larger scale if necessary and shall indicate 1) Description of the irrigation system where applicable 2) Location and height o'f fences, buffers and screen$ ngs C APPL1.C;ATIo I CH CKL.IS1 ,w.. Page C C] 1 C C1 tip 4i 3) L.,oca- °ia.on of terraces, decks, shelter' play areas and' common open spaces [ 4) Location, type, site and species of existing and Proposed plant materials. The landscape plan shall include a narrative which addresses: 1) Boil conditions. E. ] 2) Erosion control measures that will be used. C Slap Drawing Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of the Code as part of Site Development Review or Prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct the ` sign, [ ) Traff ic..W.genorat:ion estimate C �`��'`,� �'� "°�,; „,z„1 Prelim,i.nar partition or lot line adjustment map showin (No. of Copies .�_) ; 1), The owner of the subject parcel. 2) The owner's authorized agent 3) The map scale, (20)50,100 or 200 feet =•1) , inch north arrow and date C 4) Description of parcel location and boundaries [ 3 5) Location, width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel [ ]' 6) location of all permanent' buildings on and within 25 feet, of all property lines [ ] 7) Location and width of all water courses [ 3 8) Location of any trees with 6" or greater caliper at 4 feet above ground level. [ 3 9) All slopes greater than 25% C 3 10) Location of existing utilities and utility easements [ I 11) For major land partition which creates a public street: a) The proposed right- of—way location and width [ J' b) A scaled cross- secti )n of the proposed street plus any reserve str'in C I 12) Any applicable deed restrictions C 13) Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable [ {' C L C Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map and data showi (No, of Copies) 1) Scale equaling 30',50,100 or 200 feet to the inch and limited to one phase per sheet C 3 2) The proposed name of the subdivision C 3 3), Vicinity map showing property's relationship .o arterial, and collector streets C J 4 ) Names; addresses and 'telephone numbers of the owner developer, engineer, surveyer•, designer, as applicable C i 5)" Date of application C a 6) L oundary lines of tract to be subdivided 7) Names of adjacent subdivision ()I.,' na pes of recorded oi'Iners of adjo ining parcels of 'unsubdivided land C ) (1) Contour 'Y.i►1ces` related to a City,w-edtahiished bench- mark at 2—foot intervals for 0-10% grades greater than :10% C 3 APPL;ECATION CHI CKLxt '1" -� Page . v, M1A 9) The urpose, location, type and size of all of the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): [ ] a) Public and private right—of—ways and easements [ b) Public and private sanitary arid storm sewer lines [ ] c) Domestic water mains :including 'Fire hydrants ['] d) Major power telephone transmission ai.nes (50,000 volts or greater) [ 1 e) Watercourses [ .� f) Deed reservations for parks, o p en space, p athways and other 1uid encumbrances 10) Approximate Plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated [ 11) Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and fire hydrants. [ 3 12) Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision [ 3 13) Scaled cross sections of proposed street right —of [ 3 14) The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow [ 3 1) direction flow of all water— 5 Location, width and ,�:>.f"i.cl�ian o�� courses and drainage ways [ 3 16) The proposed lot configurations, 'approximate lot dimensions and lot numbers. Where losts are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots 17) The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level, and the location of 'proposed' tree plantings, if any 18) The existing uses of the property, including the location o� all structures and the present uses of f the structures,, and a statement of which structures are to remain after plating 10) wupriemental information 'including; a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) b) proof of property owner ship M N. y c) A proposed plan for, provision of subdivision improvements 2O) IF..xisting ;hatural features including rock ou.t- ' croppi.ngs, wetlands and marsh areas, 21) if any of the foregoing information cannot practicably he shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorpor ated into a narrative and submitted w a th' the application Others Ihformatiori (2362P/0O23P) 1fiPLV.WT1:0(Il CH ;RL. OT H,. 'page' 4 wwww. MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Pat Reilly, Wayne Lowry, Tandy Wooley, „Brad Roast and Jerry 0 er FROM Ed Murph. DATE: March 20, 1991 SUBJECT: Lincoln VIII Appeal Resolution Attached please find a copy of the agreement between Trammel- -Crow, winmar and the City. Please review `it carefully.; since it was done through , mediation;, and in a time crunch, it may not be perfectly clear, and it may not have covered all the issues. In essence, this is what I believe the agreement says: �. Prior to issuance of the occupancy permit for Lincoln VIli, Trammel -Crow will pay to the City $205,264 (less any fees alrera Paid, u y p , p to 15 , 00) d 0 2. We will', keep these funds in a separate account (not the $205,264, , $190,000), accr'uing interest that will ?05 26� but about e funds will only be used as a Stay in the account. These to the traffic `mitigation on Greenburg Road in conjunction with "like funds ". Note...the source for the "li e funds04 is not specified... it is expected to be a combination of WCI, ODOT, Washington County and others. 3. The City i will not collect the Streets SDC o s that would have otherwise been due, This building is not subject to the TIP' because the plans had been subMitted prior to the effective date of TIP- All other conditions of approval apply, including required traffic improvements 5 . Tramnie �. -Crow will. contribute up to $50/000 to a traffic study We have to initiate the traffic study. Although it is not in the agreement, I told them we could initiate the study within 6C days, with "initiate" meaning to contact, the probable participants, organize a work Session of those participants, and have drafted a scope of work. y s 0:f this agreement are not • AS � e mentioned/ out, So magain of 1 would a 1 appreciate your close reading of thslagreoment, and your questions pand. comments ... by' 3/29. e jm /Lincoin8,me4'` WNMAR PACIFIC, INC. 9585 S.W. WASHINGTON SQUARE ROAD • PORTLAND, OREGON 97223 - TELEPHONE (503) 639-8860 March 18, 1991 RECEIVED PLANNING MAR 19 1991 Ed Murphy Director of Planning City of Tigard P. O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Ed; Please find enclosed one fully - executed copy of the agreement between Lincoln Eight Limited Partnership, Winmar Pacific, Inc. an d the City of Tigard regarding the funds contributed by Lincoln Eight Limited Partnership for future traffic mitigation on Greenburg Road and at the Greenburg/ Hwy. 217 interchange. I look forward to hearing from you soon in regard to the formulation of a group to address the traffic concerns of the area. Our traffic study should be completed very soon, and we can use it as the basis to begin out evaluation and move forward to formulate plans for improving the transportation system in the study area, If I can be of any help, please let me know, Thank you very much for your cooperation and help in gettirig this agreement finalized. Sincerely, f � ck P. Reardon, CS1V, /C•D Vice President P.nu General Manager JPR crw Enclosure A SAFECO COMPANY 1 AGREEMENT between Lincoln Eight Limited Partnership (hereinafter "LELP"), Winmar Pacific,, Inc., a Washington corporation, including the o R- azi n 9 companies Washington rg tor S�Dare, Inc . , a Washington corporation and Fringe Land ORE. Ltd., an 'Oregon i t ed Partnership (heinafter collectively "WCI') and the Ci ty of Tigard (he r eina f ter "Tigard"). RECITALS 1. LELP has received approval by the Director of its Site Development Review File tUmher 5DR 90- 0022 /VAR 90- -0033. 2. WCI has appealed the Director's decision for traffic impact reasr.ns. 3. The parties met on F'ebrua► y 26, 1991 ; and came to an ' agreement which would address the interest of all parties. A GR:EEMENT The parties do hereby are as fol l ows A. That LELP shall pay in lieu of all other development fees to Tigard am' amount equal to $205,264.00 less any appl i cat; on and perrni,tti nq fees already paid in connection` with File Number SDR 90. 0022 /VAR 90-0033 (hereinafter tthe project" ) which offset shall not exceed $15,000,00. These funds shall be due and payable prior to receiving occupancy permit on the office structure approved under the project. B. The funds 1 n "A" above shall be paid to t# e City and will be set aside i n a separate fund account, to be used solely as a contri huti pan to the traffic mitigation on Greenberg Road and at tote Greenburg /Highway 217 interchange in conjunction with like funds contributed a �" ` • ` w a -�-- - ge.t i on at Greenburg Road or its mi t r connects rig system), Any interest accrued on the funds paid under "A" above shall al so be applied to the traffic mitigation projects, C. The City is accepting the funds r`efere# ced above as a contribution towards traffic improvements in the area, and will consider .. ent Charges that would ot�isrw�s�dbe to include any S�r.ei:s, System Uevelopm � , on the project. The ,City_, will dedicate the ,,funds, less any l i tioft and permitting fees already paid as referenced in h A to traffic c referenced _ . para,gr�p s mi t7 Kati or'� Projects as i in pa�agraPh 5, The city' s i Willing to dedicate these funds to a spec i f" l c ;r"oect or area because these funds ek eed the normal System Development costs and are being provided for the specific purpose of rn ti g. ti ng the traffic problems in the area, The City is' not establishing a precedent regarding the application of City Tranaportation Improvement Fees or System DeVelorment Charges that would apply to arty future , developments proposed by MCI or LFLP 03/o1/91 50$WPFb D. As a condition of the current Land Use shall not be required to a� for any � Application the project pay any other mitigation gation can Greenburg Road or its connecting ng system other than those a i ready imposed as a condition of approval as listed i n the above-referenced file number. It is understood that this agreement cannot exempt the project from any future local Improvement districts. E. LELP shall contribute up to $50,000,00 conducted as .a joint endeavor by ��ashi �� °to �•�+� to � traffic stF�d,y to be y n County, Tigard; the City of Beaverton ► Oregon Department of Transportation and WCI. It i5 understood that Tigard small request equal contribution from each party to the traffic study, In the event any of the funds referenced above are remaining ; upon completion of the study, these funds shall be used by Tigard for the traffic mitigation on Greenburg Road or its connecting system, . " WCI ` shall contribute its traffic study report in complete detai I to the joint traffic study referenced in "D" above. The cost of WCI 's traffic study shall be credited towards its contribution to the jol ri h traffic study, G. rr+.'' i C.. shall withdraw completely its appeal on the pro ect by 4 :00 pem. on Friday 4.arch 1, 1991, and further agrees tot to appeal anyth'Hlg else in connection with the :project through the completion of the project's buildings. H. L; ELP agrees not to appeal any future app1 i cations or proces e. in connection , with tho5te applications in the Washington Square deve lopmierit that are submitted by WCI or its affiliates. Agreed and ehter`td into ' � �� . �-•. �o thi S day . of -teb. , 1991. WINMAa PACIFIC, INC. By Tt s i P re s i d e 1TE- By ,: Its: Vice President CITY OF TIGARD 63/i.)1/ 91 s6WPPOJE AZOV Bar LINCOLN EIGHT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By David Blake, Vice - President Crow Oregon, Inc., General Partner 4 cITYOF TRD OREGON September 1090 Ms Ann P Creswell Assistant Project Director Trammell Crow Company 10260 S . W. Greenburg Road Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Ann: This is in response to your June 4 reimbursement of fees, costs, establishment of the P s . residents Pax Ewa Urban Renewal the. and incurred by the City i n connection with trith. Your check of $46,055.20 is approximately $12,000 less than our billing; adjustments to our reimburse request were made without explanation. 1 have attached invoices in support a request plus additional fees, costs and expenses P ad subse g uent to our billing that were incurred. correspondence from 1 have also attached correspo Spencer & Kupper explaining the Causes of their nigher - •than- estimated 'billing It appears that cost for the Presidents Parkway is $ �.t :the. final amount bruary estimate of costs we believe that Trammell Crow is uresponsible r � r ° fob' total reimbursement. The ex end. tures . were incurred . p � incurred we strived �.o achieve the goal of the May election. In consultation with you and your attorney, v . election filing we did whatever was needed to be done to take the e�Lec PP ram° : it was p have you pre- deadline. pove all i The estiates given to' • f , zm, oS�xble to ha y certain ass mp t ,ons about the February" were made on the basis of certa` . . � P � deadline we would receive. As work progressed . � g sSed and the deadline - filing . p ° shed approached,; work that was ��r�eeded to be done was accc-a�,� �i through City consultants on an as needed basis. Without this extra work, the goal would not have been realized. 13125 SW Ficll' Qlvd,,1',O, Box 23397, Tigard, C. regoh 97223 (503) 639 -4171 A • M. Ann P. Creswell September 4, 1990' 2 After reviewing these figures, you may wish to give me a call and . arrange a meeting for further discussion. Sincere a ick J. Reilly City Administrator c: Tim Ramis , City Attorney Wayne Lowry, Finance Director 14 August, 1990 Ed Murphy, Director Community Development Department City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: President's Parkway Urban Renewa Activities Dear Ed: In January, 1990, the City contracted with Spencer & '<upper to assist in preparing and adopting an urban renewal plan and report for the President's Parkway area, y • first draft plan and report was prepared by the Trammell Crow Company and its consultants, At the outset of this assignment as we P Y discussed the anticipated work tasks, we estimated that our fee would be approximately $15,000, but that the final fee would depend on the specific tasks which the City choose to assign to Spencer & Kupper. The total amount billed to the City was $27,455.20. As you know, this was a fast moving assignment with much work completed during a short period first draft plan was reviewed by our team, and a time. .�s application . first draft development f `° n re arced by Trammell Crow's consultants was also reviewed, pp prepared . ed, it became obvious that both ' draft documents has serious deficiencies, and that an overall strategy was needed which related the urban renewal plan to the comprehensive plan, and which provided assurances to the T rammell Crow Company that the proposed President's Parkway development could proceed. These realizations, and the subsequent tasks assigned to Spencer & Kupper resulted in fees in excess of the original amount estimated before the full scope of this assignment was known. Specific tasks were: 1. Major changes and additions to the first draft plan and report were identified and communicated to Trainmell Crow. , On review of second drafts of both required were still not of the changes documents, sortie g q made, requiring additional coordination. 2 The assessment of the financial analysis found in the report required extensive coordination with the financial consultant, ` and third party verification of many of the financial assumptions used in the analysis. 3. The relocation sections of the first draft plan and report were found inadequate, We provided new text and analysis based on the most recent SPENCER Sc K JPPER relocation requirements. 3045 NW T -ItJRMAN STR1 1;T PCJRTLAI`4D C7ItFGON 97210 4r 't • 1111 • ihr;/ • kr 4 14 August, 1990 Ed Murphy Page 2 4. We prepared additional materials needed by the city including an outline of a Disposition and Development Agreement, an outline of management and operational requirements needed when an urban renewal agency was formed, and an outline of the "next ` step" action plan assuming the vote would be positive. All of these items related to the creation of the city's first urban renewal district. 7. The information provided in the first draft development application was not adequate for use by staff to prepare a staff report. In order to expedite the staff report preparationprocess, we prepared sections of the report, and reviewed other sections prepared by staff. A missing element was identified as a comprehensive plan text amendment which tied the urban renewal activities to the President's Parkway plan. We prepared the comprehensive plan amendment. We attended meetings and briefings other than the formal meetings required for urban renewal plan adoption and city/Trammell Crow" coordination including several meetings with neighborhood groups, a public information meeting, informal planning briefin of the lannin commission g g and city council, and others. We made presentations at many of these meetings 8 We coordinated the preparation of the final draft urban renewal plan and report, working from comp;ter files provided by Trammell Crow. We also printed and copied both documents Please additional regarding our work on this lease let us know if you need additional nt'orrzmation project. Sincerely, SPENCER & KIJPPE John C. Spencer, MCP Presidents Parkway Costs associated with Development Plan Compiled By City Of Tigard Service E3illed Paid Balance Consultant Dates Costs Unpaid O'Donnell /Rams 1/1-1/31 2,063.00 2/1 -2/28 7,517.40 3/1 -3/30 5,819.15 4/1 4/30 3,154.93 4/5-5/31 4,448.55 4/9 -5/25 1,022.69 4/27 -5/31 1,565.50 Total. 25,591.22 15,399,55 14,690.40 10,900.82 Keyser Marston 2/1-2/28 1,962.50 3/1-3/31 4,312.00 Total 6,274.50 1,962.50 1,962.50 4,312,00 Oliver Norville 1/19-1/30 1,320.00 2/1-2/27 8,671.30 3/1 -3/22 3,190.00 4/1-4/27 2,420.00 3/1-5/11 2,480.75 Total 18,082.1-5 9,991.30 9,991.30 8,090.75 Spencer 1/1-1/31 3,974.40 2/1 -2/7 3,511.50 2/8-2/28 10,649.00' 3/1 -3,15 6,035.50 5/1-5/31 349,95 Total 24,5 2035 24,170.70 1x,000.00 9;52035 City Staff 1/1-3/15 6,696.31 6,696.31 5,000.00 1,696.31 Other Costs 1/1-3/15 1,1 81.70 1,181.70 211.00 970,70 Total Costs To Date 82;346.13 59,402,06 46,855.20 35,49093 O'D OONNELL, RAMIS, ELLIOTT , & CREW ATTORNEYS AT LAW BALL.OW tie WRIGHT BUILDING 1727 N.W. HoYT STREET PORTLAND, OREGON 97209 (503) 222 -4402 FAX (503) 24:3-2944 City of Tigard c/o Pat Reill 10260 S.W. Greenberg Road Portland, Oregon 97223 90024-3 90024-5 90024-7 90024 -10 90025-1 90026.1 90027-1 90028 -1 90030 -1 90031-1 90032 -1 A T T E R January 31, 1990 SUMMARY S T A T U S CQMpTROLLER LAURA RENZEMA Current Service Past Due Charges Charges Amount Municipal Courts Elections /Public Meeting General /Council, Police /Fire Trammell Crow Urban Renewal Civic Center 'Litigation Park Acquisition Urban Renewal Century 21 LUBA Appeal, #2 Don Morissette Builders, Inc. Dartmouth LID Cuprj'rertt A C C O U NT S 728.85 . 0 0 2,703.50 .00 ' 2,590.55 .00 1,110.10 .00 2,063.00 .00 5.00 .00 995.05 .00 42.50 .00, 130.65 .00 .1 452 . ?0 .00 953.15 X00 O M M A R Y Prior Balance: Payments: Current Charges : Total Fees 12,225.00 Total Costs 549.35 Total Balance Due A C C O U N T A Amount 00 00 12,774„35 12,774.35' G I N C4 Over 30 Over 90 Total. . 00 .00 12,, ?74.35 (7�e 60 X00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 IMF O'DONNELL, RAMIE, ELLIOTT' & CREW ATTORNEYS AT LAW BALLOW & WRIGIHT BUILDING 1727 N.W. Hoyt Street Portiand, C egan 97209 (503) 222 -4402 FAX (503) 243 -2944 r: t f,•y a,1 f T i yol d F, ?hr cam y ^ j C'-7;0 L /,t.s .1 fie LOVII 'j F".�.. .6'.1.: 23?`47 C t« 900P5 T d 1. rs ! 1 R ,� • i Ella) 111 Ch 111,x'. '1 `1 y .1 f'i 01:111::* i� � i �! i e ?:.1 111 /4•t)J i.ZIO 0 ylw %1� eiti i T 11. a 1 Fec�L� Ct rr ri t Over 30 OV r• 6C 01..'6,4' 510 T 1x11 7 '4'1;37. r►0 '773.30 Eq'0 flit.: ttn `I`1tac,C *payttag,: t 1€ 64.1 Utj eft -r•, 8/28/9C)4, a ttax ancC dues not reflecc payments received after 2122/90. O'DONNELL, RAMIS, ELLIOTT ' & CREW Atr1f ORNCYS AT LAW HALLOW &c. WRIGHT BUILDING 1727 KW. Hoyt Scrod Portland, Orcgo1i97209 (503) 2224402 FAX (503) 243 -2944 C 1. _.` 1".,f TiClord t-, / Lt �� *�i � 1it' '1 1.14.41 ,r •i t .181 1,t4 it) Q4 j1.11.1 rt i Cr l ` Oct) to 11t „qr; riot CI'. ;;;; j1i. t;da Pt it rf..■ 1 Stier ,11L." i'ii.,'J'ifJ1, 'i`t4(1 t~ 1.'alY tiJ l lti= t : „:i 1 1 L.'1 1µ p t1 la` w t t.h PR Jir j.s • +..:a * 1 r`? ! 1..'l� t.'.1 � y+ t•tr1 . } r1- • t,.'1,rJtt +rt=: Y «U18F :1 t�rl("4 0,,tj iG t•Ji: t,. !40; 1.1 i /ii Y,.Y Srj1l�Y1» r r c , ^11 i, td1 i 1 r .a i ,,%8; Fa::.; t "'it', °' 013 1;14, DC' r :1 "4 DI; 1"1' ? iI 11 1 rt,tr x t 1,t 1 i "i~1 f; f. Y3{{��i 1.+ •!1':•A j. L.1 OjIY..,w' 4.11 �1; t 1.,51tt a+;titlr:'i Pr f_'i .Jt ;tit•ti1r1 Ytr iii „� t � + 1 5,151;t., 115;1; r 8.)) a i (r .1 41.J ,. f' 4 Cif) 4,q1 t r 1:4 C 1 t L +r r t• t_ Ltr1 1 y l,tl 1,�1.�tYI � h.�r L. .s 1,•i_i i11t,+1,r i �.til and OP-� t 1i1rt1t. �.1.1Y:YI1. �Y4tt'•`_I.t_s«!sr: t�'5 " l i: Y t1lt i!;~ -+ Yc..ott'rt =r taiIL.L• L' fit`; 111/1; t' i 1,14 4 � t.1 t ' J • r Y t1 fi.YtY !u i:r1 «.t,.11„t j : r• v 1 ;,Y1'1 " _ :1rta1' 1• r"e" il.tu1.1 repot h; Confer 4dtt;.Y --' with ; s t.'1J +1 Li .1 rill i 1_ _.441411 f4 1;41 t' 1 r i 't1::r i ` 1; _ • =t i "t c! 1 YY.1 s•,�i Lekt s3tICI ?ljat •+ , . �'L 1 1 " 111&; •:tr1r1 1. /311- .1.irit.`, J'Ittrfus Lis is t•• 03 1 i17 5'P J { r ({ ■;l -' ■31,'84 .0 Id rt:1t,s4 L ::1t:4• , t. 0117'0. 1 ) rt_'4:1) tr: . +11:1rnC 1:0 141 dry ��, . 1 : - tl.`11i.,'(ry4,t;1 p 1 . 1 ") "u Off 1t "ty Lo)1rt -ik t. , 1„1 �; �' rz t' �r i 1��:1'j r..1t�;� «i11t rry .land !.isle pt ; Dr 10 ti afttJitlL1) :411t,,11.lr)t = .,. OP . to PEG { r '1`4.11)1 -•f «11irHt }f`I . Cl r:1 = r l'!1 ' .' ! t 1= And 1',.i L 1� 1 •.. r" CI�t c Y r {. `'.' » Cll.t 1 .) 11.11 jdlil,t4r «' l„,1,41) it‘t)ti 7;! u • lts . ut to TC C4:r4f`Qr !.ttlCt Ea$ 1h 3) +..;r! EL1, irr is tL J '_trd 1 l 4:.!111 1 t (. 0,,p-,1 oP /r 7.li:'U P+r etiz>t, for trivee :.1rjr o 1- ,� . )� rr'f ?�.t 1Y 'tom 01.4n �r 1rY olti.j ),1 1 «r!r ! .j =� 1 1(Sfi°` LL7.=yr1 . ;:• Lt11 atr! 1-E11x4:cteiA !21tLi 11r,1 I1 t ��iid p0.11cab31 t9, to rg i i , Teite1:t1rrtrl2 C0ilr( *, 1L tl1L fix 114 P re i'di -1rs Ur IC.; `oti 1'41) � 1 t1„ x , 1 LIg�:I't�:rt'1t � 4',is �a�7 �i.�4,.(1i?...I X' t J 1 i g t`�rt�. t,ltrzt.w agt- C'it,'141t:,nI �is1fi4�il:i" r�1 4J ., and ' r.r; • yl • 1�'1 -A .: tor - _` T Yt t". T JR • 1 . w; 1 O,Pr Ot3 '`1` • "t }std ►�, ' I.r t... 111E }. 3t`t�INr~ +1l i "'Ct }' L�r •.> r. •, , " �fT i T'f'; ,�,- 1 338,, oo 2,88/904. COMPTROLLER LAURA RENZEMA O'DONNELL, RAMIS, ELLIOTT & CREW ATTORNEYS AT LAW BALLOW & WRIGHT BUILDING 1727 N.W. Hoyt Sltlxt Portland, Orcgon 97209 (503) 222 -4402 FAX (503) 243 -2944 Qr 1 „t ��.l. 4'144•' 1,.1.11'41 T,4 J if.' i. t: :'6:%; 1iS) j'c:= 1,. t;:.. :4.ai 111ii,11),: Cam:, n i':''f (','1'11. t,• 1•.I1 ti.i 011 1 "1.)tiei "d,tog 0.411 T11'"", F. . cr. ,. r 4 .. s• , t, s. . i 1:+11.411,.:011.; 11;7it.:E.1ii1,i11L.' 1.41i1 it` »9 '..t. :, ;1 14.441 !t) 1 ' '1 utt "t.t t 11 1 :`•.i t t: 1,'414' •; i i, 'i si.ii' < Sit?,,,' i _ 1 _ r 1'i 1::1, :1i1u 1i, :1 •t,1 :raid..' »ta1l1t:'i .. t'...: :.11.9 :11 i-';5 1' :3 i 1''.9 r i 1'y( .1. 410.,4 w I" :s∎Alitti,..1 110t 0 ,r` ;I L! ` 1. f' t ':i. 1",0•.'a'atis. is Pi, t Y; 1 `it, 4 ;4:i)'::ir1 J'.tl 1,,'r :• a 1.1 C.. "i 1` i... i ...I , 'i rid .:' 11..n I r ✓ 1 1'1.i d i - :..i. i' it i J •11 i .4 1 : _ ! .f.' Y' ;, F ;'' Ei' `; 11 :..'aiit.,'if7.,.1..tt „r.. 1 .r iS.r l'' in i 1..' r•a OP • r. • � 1 1,,3 � i i.+ I c.c. Ia l , ,,..,1,,,,.; 1�. ;. y. l i", t+'r.. ry. " t F i a I �!'�1 M , t , a I `}'.? . 2 ' i; 1 i I ?;] rf I t , "�: +-. ,r, g ; 3: `) 'asia",t1'ttq.. ..'111L.1 h.i: 0f.,.! 1' {, r . C i 4'i'IS;V, i >"✓ 1+ati. i 4 Id ,', 123,";i1 1'.'11'1'1111.1111...- con f l:,.i ..,.,,,t, '1 }:Liii°1 )JJ t' r.:11..:if''.11iti T 1 1"1. _,t': 1•- '`'.`j ,,;tI,JI i_1;,,'!111:.'1iI.; 1i� y �r . t. ; •'.i1�w{:.11•YU "tlt» t.i�;i �: t,,fi I./C Yegal'f;i1 "t'_7 i i.a I I' ;.11 IQ; I L: c r,, f l I' t,: f' ,1 1:, r 44 ,4.1: 1 ti t?, i I 1. 1. i 1 1 T. 1 r. �� TA iJ c -4 ', +,r;'1 "' ;fit', 1 4.c, c,aI 1.1•! nu 14 riillfiil..tii 1 Ci''.'i44 4:i.tlrr:C31;ii�11I "R 0 r t i i.i. ,�'. i� f t`I:'i7%J 1.L1ii�i:'1'�11t �• 1'i�.t11 r, , i'(a11..ti'.iiit's •1• ,..13 v.ti tri 13 ..1r•'a IA:N.:L :Jlf4 410.4L.odo with l.'ai1`.fs1 tr;111'..tsi. i F '' R1-t�. 14.,q; . is.1 :i- � , t 1't r: r• Af ia l i c:la 2,M.A i (first 9i Liss and 1;,..).i tr 39 ,,:qt t ::'.. :It :1.: i 11 � .i i,. lt» :1,..1.ilti.1l,i r cal 1r1'iii IAJ04 ;4.4 1'O4 «11'1..1.1,10 F'�'"" ' '�`l. y-. .. i r 1'r al,''' �_' i 1 t ' i �- t t i„ r,l i 4 * r;: El i 1:114 114.1'1.. 3 1..:, ^ r" 14:0 'e I lt. 11 .l i'sd ` 611141.1 .. t M L.4lid'. y 1 t <yP:1 9 /90, RCP 1 t ,.+..■ .:.1t11J erli.. 1 p ,.. i.. 1.;t,t i f .1 1.. * fR4lili'.i1 a 1!'.ct t 4144"• _ i 4..g,..1) t.i.i 1144 i t;'1 „1 11 t w'ti ia()ri 1,23,...41+1.:'....: (i ?'DO :+ OFF 1 i.'.,• t_ C9 !"f f t l l t :'311. .' t,,! 1.,:h P .: t ' F 1 1 ,. i7 Po t. 1 r u � I I ?.( E1, �' •fr' ry •-. � -� �. �% � i t'•i,3 :-11 'd i 171.1 t.Y 1 1t r a... r i ., > st.i 1 »' 1'_ {'1 4.117' L all tl r 1'rr31 id WO Ci 1 1 :5, ''r tg:,;t t I; i rig. PC PEO 1 i.°. v t 600...0 1442,# :I1I1.,,it 1.4.4• ".4kji.4 iiiLit_t :tllicllit ►1,11' 1.10.1114..:^t A,-.4.y 111444;:11',ta tilitil r.,pn, AhLc.1la Cit y .1 atlat.41314 v..'Uiittii i s J !dl i :'44.11 li.E 4 144i a :11'41J 1tt»'ial J 1.34 .■ C, ;p?8j • a 0 Tc.10... i.ti44t {I " cooroi L :Fill' I.J.I 1rh .k. 1_yd.'ti t "I'c, ,t 1J1I1g TVR r ^'e { 1 8� :tt rr 1 Qt.i.0 L •eild riitin1'195 Tel o}.lF3i.:11'ltt c 1'ttfL 4 {..+1111~` (41 t1-1 ON rc.g.it IJi ring cis 1r•i1 E.s to pi1r_+0 on ii t r 13i„tl W+ r Tel i;pl -li_ li:i i. co )Fi:•) (. )•4'.1L+ U .1, 1h Pot R. i tag rdi ttil t�lr1IL' f L4v .L -1 and 4iialy. 1Ssl4t.1 . 1 ' 4;a P =od 4t; PC War k s1.* . ` '1' tt.t�, E'lu1 or'4t:t.., dc.L.s n + i' 'F] a - 1 pa;:•tuljirl; i� t .' i � t� a;f t tir 2/28 9Q0 el 1.t'; J%ila Tr.') f.i {; i. i l ;f y �1 f ti 4 .`t.0 t.4:4; ,,riti 1 .cmt" r I9. 01.11: r. ,.7-. d 1 ,141 "Ci • f: rogi'! ►1 972;-'3 .hst+tftt: O'DONNELL, RAMIS, ELLIOTT & CREW ATTORNEYS AT LAW BALIJOW & WRIGHT BUILDING 1727 N.W. Hoyt Street Portland, Oregon 97209 (503) 222-4402 FAX (503) 243-2944 1.i t„1tri 1,11 J, «tcii! i "..'tkc "u: c:} DJ LI-1 Pl i.,i "f.t Y.1t..3 Si,_e► •r lt:rL;. '1'tro1'i'; t.'1 1t,t,,; 1.1ij :.t 1 i► i,l`ir i LU''t`ii +al t.:ti�,.l vtf :!i 1,:;f i; t.t•1 f Aliia, *..S:':ai r 1'i, pt..i t: r-Er1 4„`'2:r 1; d.cri dJe ►2!4.4 1. t t 1tL F11,3,;t:li :f 4, 1.411 !t'f r�yr ri 11C1 1. ii'iu (tlfwdttt.ta' ill tr. For tif:lriU. 1T: as ' !i j I t i 1. 1 1 e3'1 t�f i 1«i ?.0 .i Li 1 1 t..4 i;1 C! rt., f.tt'k_� .d i 1 1 �:', 1jw t'� : . 1,! .11 ! 11 i i r " t k. L.4 :.t .1 1.11 1- `1,41.1 F ` 1.. t. ► a'i i. ; I 1 t:►1 r1: t.i+ i• "s"'•d.! i''1'i:it.td z4�.ii_. ;; i ter!" (T'1L'L..1. j1't:, L:1 ill 1.-'611.6 ti :{:,tr11: i; Gi" )8- t f.1 111 t. Lti1 -. t.t 1 %:ai;;1. r' i d:t, rril iJ,i i13f t it0 tl�t� i:t }.t 3..1.11 ,:itd CF` i i t►ii t I'uj.. {.;!'1 j ! , 3: 1 (1.;'t` V i'i et< «.t.:+.lt..t1 _ 3 tt! :i 1. i•1:t 1_11;; re r- y 1 ► ►t1't i t.�3 Eil`ti.l. =" ift`;h :rlc!tt•is'('1" cj.;l i "s 1 'li11j ..i't.il9t, !,3 4.1d(41`Y.?, =111 r 11 Ltt t` a 1i::i3 t :' 111( fl.tt eiiiid !1+%1a..11k; Jtik_t_. 1.1 i' :U 4rit 1't 13 _i,.t«3 i,.L•t ;,ttt.) i 1 :4111 4.t011 -14! 1.1''f t:41,ti i ()1' 1.11 r. "s t? 1►V ?t l•` ►tli.'adtt.ii' 1111.'11111, i:i:i C: a 32,1 'ij! . 11,r ,11 t31tdii F' .!. 1111 3'i 1.1.'iat;t :14,3 11121:01 1314 iiili'.!3 ._4 . 1 tdlM.a ti1.'diti.il r1•d11,ia111t !';:+ +' t1,:'i�u:i .1:L;11_l 111 3j 3;1 iti »r ti :i,i; 1 litP.3.tltfj�' tti Rt„...4? 1 1,411 '1,, t it 1'Y;; i,+f ;t::.i_sy PE l t uftlf Ir`, s a c.1tl+ 111 ,» ' t,Ii ttf'jY....,i w3 «!1'1~_'11 !- 'i~a.i ti 4. '.tti +t t.a,sU:i�•t.� rt•Els,tltti,S11►i ci3'11:J 1..1. +13tdi: 1 ;3.1;1 Ft;f1` l-1 'S (.1+a11'i;twlat (tirsi.+aal 1 G1 1 ,;��ti• - ri; 1 ; dtP i 14:44 _ f r 1 Lai 1-1 ;.( (4411 °Y, . 3 32.1(4:1 1.14;.(; 1 It;'p' R 1 {' 1 i it)(,( ,; l y 1 i R14, 1 �.`w "� y:it t:r i-' a t ICI :.i +i`1�, ^"•, •: ;11 1 !iti11,t:1.1 1j 1~3.J4f:fi..1 1.1.1)1 14; 1 1 1 zttil A_ 1iLd,1` #al Y 11 RI 1=;1:11 i `f, w"1 :T118 Re/. i B it. l ; ALI i P1~.0 P1 11 171 Ed GI 1 t+.; ,. i 7f, Y 1141 • 1 --ke r,! {:a 9414° IldtE 1111(!. • _ 8 ,, ,51 /5.00 ii .,;� . 710 4«y{ u r r 1 L: +.F ri 0 4; 0 3C`► 75.00 0H20 50.0 1 9Ct 8 r. 00 ;6. 0 0,31.1 ' 15,100 511.1.x:3 ` 0.00 1.(.:.? 111(.11114 k I.ft.' +: A »iii G ^t° 2/r 8190 31 t. ; .:; 1 «r sts�, COMPTROLLER LAURA RENZEMA 1 ay 0 f t• r tj )I •.,try• l CCLa Chi• :'1a1.,; t O'DONNELL, RAMIS, ELLIOTT & CREW ATTORNEYS AT LAW BALL OW & WRIGHT BUILDING 1727 N.W. Hoyt Street Portland. Oregon; 97209 (503) 222 -4402 FAX (503) 243 -2944 li +l.h�} j • 1'11 '1; l,`� qq 11.. r. • (+1 H,:411(.1 - C C O D U T Z t + i_ :itz- real. tkv,ur 90 `7,45'47.4:1.) 4 f ., . ::10 1 04.00 0.00 • O'DONNELL, RAMIS, ELLIOTT 8,c CREW ATTORNEYS AT LAW BAL.LGW & W'RIG fT BUILDING 1727 N.W. Hoyt Stroct Portland, Oftgon 97209 (503) 222-4402 FAX (503) 243 -2944 t'L Wc' ht.• 'Lowry 18105 S.W,. Neat 1 Blvd, F.O. 80x PS.9 '7 Tigard:. Or *96n 97R. -8 Tr � alcrt,rt '3 l Crow Or 8n R'i.'r tl•-r•:;.d P'1ar4: ') 30, 1.990 P t ri 1 9005 M8ttl -r : 1' 8 R90 90 D8tp Pr L(i t ,s,Ictna t-'r v' c t E-' Rt•r,E. +E••r et.) At1y Hr. l ti E-. Alonnt 02/04)90 - r1•�' +;) "i-' t:r�1 • •� 1 ' 1;�) • ti� d t;,s:. 03/01 /90 Tt.'3(*Phono ct+'rr'iE•r •ttl' wi1.5, F8i. R rEt;t'reirCF+ TVR 1.40 91.00 ¥ i'c1ardirsr r , lr:rt�t:� i.t� CFF Ti.14:'L,tactna7' CL'rrtjr•lt.tf• ti c.c'or is i r,::t•i.t:• edit o�•i ' +1 }. c;i,» 1 "ta(.tt.I't'1,. PPG 2S0,00 T1ai) alhon+i,;i :nt 4nd 1)4110 10 1;1 1'?. rEst +:Lt.t`Laid.tr, ccirri.G'it`!i.rrt. Urban rt''t", ' a3. MM11 0.80 u i % i.1 ?; F i lia y i ,:, • Alo ; F &x t:o Cis i;i7y Wl,t- a t l t. " }a . C in L.iul.,'r w. r 0 4tr tFt 't.± -`;i r,ta uT it mor drtOuit to Efl L.F 1.10 27 r �`l.r ;pi)yr ! •f +iardlnJ r')-A a 1 _ + f.ra t OUM1',t.ttt •r Word J pr ttt l•kt,i i•tti t +; ftt :flct'r aYtaciro to &tJ CH 2.20 r 0 a.0(r fit.ir Oh'' 1•* art.L i�tt1 )•i•a ;a shi4�"• • u r 03/02/90 Tt:'1 c•L +I t+rtt • t bn' t:•r t.rit i with DFi regar d i -1c 0 156.00' T4�k �. 4 ti R :4v . ::w and ana 1 y.+ tJra r 00A. Ct�rltintu• c. .cc.T .)irt :ttitlrr with Ell Murphy cind PFG 5.40 270.00 John, S;stabc.,4r • i!� v'Xt: l lat+ s'c + t til tilati_ For t t +rat. +r �;i.t• 1 �crt arrll--%,6tsrt'rlt a 'rti urban ri rrtr••wa Tti,1 :•?p +on,.4 8:4115' i. ti (8x1; `fo11✓pL, tt'rt;' t.ct1 !;• to L'1t r L =ity✓ (?x); Rt t,L-' ri1! 03)0:5/90 ri' r,t t+ with PP arts. 5h r�t ='t�t � � ar d $ f "ti-; YVR 11 00 0. 00 crib E1DP 14 tt3 .i F';+ vi' 0 And �! %tci y! . l~° Y'ttt,4. 1 t t• ] s tt1.'; T&i i- 'E't }rt,trrt-' c t.rs, l:.r 'r,1 t. re #•mot' 1 i:s Tia1+4t.1ho e t t rri i t'ir oef It a<i 'Li r i, R rt,l,i:tr is rri, 6attrt. tt t•�rtt.t't', +: Z 1 ba +:fit' ; 'a`5 it:►'r7 4 t +i rt?U:4-(tOititi 4b FFf 4.00 200.00 tfs R + :t4.11,aril'ti4 1:s a �1 .1�"�!_t to '3; itr1" t.°11i!ktwd.l' tsiP 'tintjr td 141`(!l t:'< t"tt.+l:•'t. F,t;Ft $ ' 0/90 COMPTROLLER LAURARENZEMA O'DONNELI,, RA MIS, ,ELLIOTT & CREW City 4. ;a7'+1 { 11+ •Wi,t y ril' j.:;r iAtr '1f t31 R3 S.W. H.it l 1tivd. P.O. rtti•e, PS3 r7 Tigard, Or +.;t,ti 97P.P 11 G;'i.i. yr M Tr6'ttris,it•11 Cruw Ltr'a.+r:s51 Rt••!'li. Wct3 (COut:. ATTORNEYS AT LAVA BALLOW & VVRIGHT BUILDING 1727 N.W. !Hoyt Stnxt Portland, Oregon 97209 (503) 222 -4402 FAX (503) 243- 2944 mc3r, :h SO, 1990 Pacje Cl 1+=fi4; '1'}P5 p,� c !'Ici'G t.c',:' ,`, 1 D : t•{ t tt'if. .8. l trrrcr St •r v :t t e RP.6rr<1-•f'E�t) �'d. d 'y Ht ii t r', k` tsrttt4 r'd• £13/ / 9'.i CEP Fi t+i1n+j °r TVR :.: O �t.•,C! T • I'd +fstt�t t' t C•I`t:^ft(e, "with PR r ciEltrOillt.i �dltt� "p T: 1:i')�fat: +YStt' t:Ctlis�'t�s' =-) # +: ' W C11 Ed 11 i "► � �= ci't�Iilt •s irrt►.f.} +L-,,1 Te1Fplec.4n Cc'nirErsL with, ]D Ekr3s trry i' al,::0pdtt :+rii3 t: +:t iFj3l °rt1i+ 'wt i 'l r *tJc1r L)#+J boil.itrrg riff estat, ptdttlr ,irL +t t♦dt.tt=•E . Cunti,110.4 rf'BE T , h P 0 &.80 ' r:fj.00 l •akd; M:' ? dr t, t1i w. its# }� c {� 't •1 t� }+ lttYst✓ lr on r-t t:•'rrt & with Pk ra✓c.,t r Oi •n r !-1 'TV , fit: =c7 !►? t �? 4 :Y1" g R. v' 1 Ird and ani:f x y z►:i �t it TE-; T'1 idr {. +frt,• crar-ss & >re'rrll: :sth JD. idt� . • i "tsi,�1`' <�Lr # ►dalYSlt•=.t1 'v 0FF'tt :14, t�s:ttiFr�Yti'i7 +_iy b1k141'i r;rit; .OH r tr'ttcir ti 7'rt,;, 'c >dsu}r'` K IF? ''•d `a t•K!t 1,411 , t d;rE- dtccrt• r'r�:7•L "i iirt`�.r,t +tiv Fr t�'ct 3. It; t+ 'PPE. r +aSO Ft is r�C i i`r i ►Y rt,a~t : i {,eft ` 1.ef l 13 d`itrr V 31 - alit; Po Ti i Rd t ealssti.ii. t-; 9,tfl f'.:: r•: tj.c! "+ t'iiI 'i'+ !�3+�f>< ' Pt;rd'eiT i f 1'!3 t•6i �I�+e +�+ p 0:4/08/90 r t:l: 'its t.a i..*'ri)`t-}i.., r'a �, z _ �� y _ ,t7.'l.hfrttsf +. t�l�aGi "t +:d �' �'i?�i13;3iPi: +tip +:1t►lfe~;�t�i:itt_' wH.:h 0' ro trtiiriti W tt '�,lt '+-• �r' t) t s tt +3 t� .tri t; P c+ ( erc.� t 'Tor M e 7 Gtiii+ t i h dist.)'.:4.1 t;. t h w tI i st dart i Liltasr C.+ .trrrtr'rt.lt• Ov 6.r'i, �"�t5tt:tt °lctk4a 190,00 t iyi��ti t a•ts 'c4!' t ,: U= !# ��"`3 lYtltfkl ";/ Fit >JF2i1 F1't:ti➢i t: it a #"IMO 0440 C'ursipui.t 'r 6Ti f'1.0t`r . #tjt, k#:rsti �d✓ t"i P. O Tt r� ts� iYr1,` C 1 1 `ily ttfrs Zt i ei r $ .'rt 4✓y i' •t�a�tr iii l l`f t' CH 0 .it t y:: r:r tii� �;t:: utrti't�r.11 1�i'• ;tksltt. 1 1 — Cr't;►l'� lbt� `t <, r."trei r Ti 1t«),.,fltt ?sl,‘ c dl1' i.t+ 1= syt'l! t.iitJ tJt:si:t,tlr,t?iit� . t s t� l<: Jac r ; i' k tap; 7t �1�e�.ttrtrttt�a�l l i °t }It► h4ttrvilI6 1�r1r��tCd�r�lt �...,siij 1:li r �.y �e:tirtt:ft:lt,0.r it1' +1 s r t.ii.,i.+a'�lt i y ci"..3/ 09 19Eti ' 4'01' ! Yl t 3 t i:tt.CYlt 11 Cr:k�t. -t rltt « Ti'�d~:` 3. 1) 19f1,. 00 Y t� i yC+�r i +i /ly� 1. Ctz t i + •4,5 COMPTROLLER LAURA'RENZEMA tl . • d'; d�tn (Catrrt ) O'DONNELL, RAMIS, EL,L,IOTF & CREW ATTORNEYS AT LAW BALLOW & WRIGHT BUILDING 1727 N.W. Hoyt Stnact Portland. Ostgon 97209 (503) 222 - 4402 FAX (503) 243 -2944 CitY t t Ti (J;Ar l+ March 301 199 t; / i W.; v off•. t ."Wf v Pagq 3 131P5 _ I. 4 .0 1 1-{3.t . Client: 90+5 P.O. 1;(t <;' R3397 M .e t t* r : r, ticts lro Ori•gteft 97?P T . §tr)trt -x'11 Crt.4W: Urban Ren,mal Di; i•t✓ Pr tre , .t.,k:.ttrti. ;l S&•r v i t:t, Rt•rsti--•r fed i i•t y Httttr Atuous st Ct.:ttrip37*te findings ,and )'«: l rl.• t$ l.�.s2.)+?s with PEG 4.50 x'+`7.3..40 city. R,1- v,`t�&- rP5tt3uti.t'rs fur urban rErrtr. n 3 to ri it 1.50 45.00 1 t.. t dj �• `3� Ai�i't: C ].1 � For publication; SF'{. r t tar i c3 er Vic,fr- .; Ri. v2t-frtt irct%iis* to b4y p 6lis 4 i" :wtj srdintj ballot ti t1f , Arrarst,fr for pit kttlf of additional nal $(Mi: :4i•1..1.4 For t`•'art:i') 1 mt:.,oting. romp ti.2•r word prGtt 4: °S!x'r"sct of ifir1£r:t'frt:, +$ ctrsiJ LF 1.0 4C}.00 t_onl: lt,t'3 tt:tn-5. T441='-';lisOn, t. :�al1 ; .o Cathy 03/10/90 i✓rt~i.sar t~f xc +rs Tor Ist; -gar i rst . TVR 8.50 1 Ap . 5 } 0:3/1;.2/90 O r i i..: * + otF t4,n : with PR and Ed M. TVR 10.70 693.50 r ec tr tti rttt ;tr Plt ;r a 1 ittrs fur IsPar :trscj; Tt- �1 &EslrGtrt ,:e:. 1)ri, s " :i1r,- , w t. uh 08 1-44t.1,,A 'tJ is)cJ op ions; 'I't•i &Eattttrtt• tctrri -- rl,rrt,P wit', Et M. rec.rart:+ir•tc� 11:: " ?iuv:' ` At t: s 41..;j3t: i 1 work ti e ...a 1 c) a11d hearinui PA,V t•W ant', Ari 3yrt✓ acgtta ition ttcdirt r1ti iTtp4 ko11t'.t ♦' t rt, ani t:• at ai :itt tr:i mziteria)b for Matrtir 1? MMn 0.PO .0 IIo t+))1t, 03/13/90 TelOphune c t +ri i t-r rt4 i with PR r tt r t;<itEcr rr : `L TVR ti - 39.00 Ci ay zt.it k•;; T ::c1:4pilon. ..:o r.-!r • ni.:0 w;'. t: OH rt:• ,t itai'trtj r }T}A R yi E-! k tl a a3yxt.• t tion 4turE- -tt:'rt6 and KMF }:(r 3,,00 ~r t)l�t � + 0,1/14/90 Tic- t ;,tistrrt£v Lail Truitt yD. Eckman regkre;:i rti C4 0.80 7.50 : :i):i..intj tt):s•a intjY rg1:±13hccnt4 4 :all GP4+ D. .,i.y3!Mt111 t,Cc C.tt rt•d :ii T /It k 03/i/ 0 TE 1 tt'l sttrtl c.ctn rL T Pric ti with OH rk%a rt: x r; TVR R C }.80 e).150 Ft•ii✓W arid cf 1yct-. C ti O t r£ t- itor:Yt6 t �'f P i�.yr031 t4/70 T 1 4titil t.:l 1 lt� With Li + at�t j .30 rtPi Ultitttr ti s1i 6?-iirttt apPt'at) r Of -rit t. t:t.tllrtl) •:r'tt;'j with 113 y 0 . tl' d OH. rltt 3, i r t t 1 t °t . ,t s this -rtt±, r tt 7 v` i t a'r 1tt -? 3/t40/90. O_ COMPTROLLER LAURA RENZE" 1A 1 tN • 4 . , n • • O'DONNELL, RAMIS, 'ELLIOTI" & CREW ATTORNEYS AT LAW t3ALL.OW & './RIGHT BUILDINtG 1727 N.W. Hoyt $tract Portland, Oregon 97209 (503) 222 -4402 FAX (503) 243 -2444 Cif! or Tigard _cWr Y 12123 S. W. Hail Blvd. P.O. F(.t >, p3397 T i4J._ti"d, r) -, t n 97R.R r 20 t t i } 99 PaLtE' 4 Mttittt:'i' r, M i.tti. -'r Traisiwt.•31 Crt,tal Urban R art w 1 (Clai'tif Dat't,1• Prt.tT'a•s.,t:,i.ona) S 'rvit & : Rt••rlOt•'r6 A•Lty Huck•, r-. Y t stcci.�i k't r+L (foJ rpu t.::er word t�r^t,rc�: t #q r Pi:.st!'t.rf' < 3, i;ki1 r-"s°a L i _ ! < ! t .-i; i :kti! t:+ LE i . (':� 1 ti0 . TVR r t:'tt ci? t i :l f tj t.r i.c i, i °'1' ' � %3/19/90 TL14Tht.�r4.• cal "rt l i;. rt- j rtirt:� T l tJa1 •ti; R:4V 1::.?tt law. Coi,P, rkiti:•r wort) pr L +1. E." Esir t of r(seAo at tit.iir: 'LL LF 0730 ` 0 TVR P� �_+ ar4 t ncj Ti ,.am € . 1 1 Crow op . t +,.<n . 7 b , 03/80/90 r #t -ru':t L °z3 air i Du,., vG'L us s r,i.E., r I `t 2 r �•cra k ' 4'' '. t1t�' f�� c? c:tv•d i,' i + :c11 a;�3t:c;�a i!}i ; Edit ter :tr„t.%r11..1,n is .. 00 03 /P 2i/90 Telt- +iri.!r,&.-' r_unfr� t4r c� with PR rPg tr ui rtt,� 1300 ;:,os,4 t t)1 ;•;w'ri'r+3 tkhct 11 f t g,_+, ' d .. is rs a itt:-'ctc l i) Pt. ra ciPl"PLr i vp 1.50 97 .no t 3t :t'a`3'1, t1 l :j 1 °+,totem i :''; i:• cs j" t t�l��tt: <o,4.ri is g Tie �. t ):tl"ECr �N' , 1 tcir r er - "rit. c. with DE r eg ar O i nt DnA; T &1 t--p) u'ht' +` :r:+k#r : k :n. :* W1t.h 1.1:! N riz,tj.yrd 6,') J r.i);t�:ir:rn(.4. R c13 /E+ /9O `l'i='lt •1P tLtft. LL'r'r t:- rt.•Y'ce with Ft.) M. �r r,cr7 dint TVR G}„�j > *t . 0 ° x t: tli s 111 L11'4 O3 A ;arof :a ti ; T+>. "3.v�t»y ;fhond=' t brsfer t ric .• with 1. l'1 r e Jar t_r i r tr .iL,t�,s b i aPP *,t l 0 /28/90 T&'7 t•j.r9ttrr t., L ctrr' t•r t-rrt c,- with 1 N r t-r4 r.tr t <i rte TVR 0.30 19.50 .110 t4 tr„P? L`-=..su; =!. R& v1 t' t cr rl.ti't;] »p r't. t °t it .. with ot. -k1 then; PEP 00 150.00 • } t Y • -'y: r,,,., &c 1 Ap)3•?o11 qtt.' titan:.; j+jt:. r GC' i t.trrft:'t' t:'rrt t;• with, WAM Tct bat I- kc*.n- 107.30 Th 1 G ry :, .:.::t; 41 i.t.rt: rrt: -yf Rt--t «t {t Hour C Lt:" } tt ttft AA 3.00 0.0 TVR T't rtttt tI sY , V. Rilim i. h 50.80 +5.00 3, 30 +P . 00 F''11 t l I li E. Grillo i, r 70 .t'C1 00 1 915.00 HMOk�( �1 1� 't « J t MO T atuk et H. Uttyly PH 90 30.00 87.00 Lr 1.0) .-1. (='r:+Y i:• 'r 8...30 R i {) :t c1 1 J c1 CI-1 C tl trt, E i1iLr }3.10 P{(.00 77.r0 jI �+� RF: Ftit.d 1 f t Kt' i t.yt jor 0.40 85. 0o .MF ;t-.&rrt',P Hr E13itriL P.90 65 « C : i t� f,-,: . QCc1 i 3/,`30/9Q 3,814.30 COt„1PTHOLLER LAURA RENZEMA ',i O DONNELL, RAMIS, ELLIOTT & CREW ATTORNEYS AT LAW BALLOW & WRIGHT BUILDING 1727 N.W. Hoyt Sirosi Portland, Oregon 47209 (503) 222 -4402 FAX (503) 243-2944 Ci t t G'f T:r,ttcC;; i Lowy'? 13925 S.W. Hi31 H1VL. fl. > :: 3 97 T cizef fir. Or ."t{rrr 97PP-3' COMAPTROLI.ER LAU(4A RENZEMA jr 6v 1990 Crr1ifit')`!t 9(? )P; Tr..i,Asji :y I 1 1;1'+. w i trl) _'t) i (Cont a ) PIft.t'1.i.rt tti.c To tai 0 i sl.ii..iy`iSi�')'k Cur r' &-rrt CI. Iet Ba 1 ant " »e due A C Q O O N T 13 1 N 13 Current Over 30 Over 60 Over 90 Tc4&d ,71819-15 7, 517.4O 773..16 0.00 toy 1 t0a0 Fiat "f "ft tilt ' : Mit ref' 't t t�ay'W '''rt +'1"et i,+'0:1 arter 8/80/q0, (•,. 4JIti •- — 0 T4JE 1 s ~ 22 CSRE &IG iC 2•C#- 2 4-4 O'DONNELL, RAMIS, ELLIOTT & CREW ATTORNEYS AT LAW BALWW 8 WUUQH1 BUILDING :1727 N,W, 14,oyt Sow Portlatld, Oregon 97209 003) <2 °12 402 FAX (503) 743.2944 April '3 1990 Page .1 Client's 4.90025 Matter s 1 rtedarett �,l 1 � • ••, id,i r �Il tl � . r! „"� r7y .,.,hy � + ' .l r ,. 1•" , vi, ,e?x. r a , r1d,.;caX4pi,1 lyze ,•. Keef fe r memorandum • "regartdin 1 ge ection ; �e]e h oge conference k1 ON,o Peep , r t, on for .meeting, with City afft tf.i.e,'codere ce with staff '.F •I { rA y k' l.•' � r r,r , r :g� X� � e a c � � i �4 ��l a �� H4 and quasi i,1 � . , , „ i Co p4gt.e•�r� �; b 7 d l( .,pr ocess . pg of ti ndttgs \ , + , r gc,als 3 'and at •t ',�1�{ * �.�. Letter lltC ,�4'�,;j,•,1 I• M' . � dr,�'ie t'. ,dl �`�y��'` ., ' •, r' , ,.• , �. " '�r,- ` „J�4. ' e pho .e,rle : ca11.: firm 'C'ql Wheatley regard n g,. ° ,/;- 5 00 4, :94'. , r Yl ...y a p ellea+ te ;issues; FtG 2, 00 y ,l l 10 0 , Qy Pre �ar j d cg �.memo a .duxr a 1 oXleate .� r C Oiiri 4 .e , ., ” a'r p `oceSt r l C ' letter to 0 60 � :' i o Wh' at e' D .oaf , ti 'of a ;I:r0.4Ai0J.,44:41')44ic rtords request;: Fax to cw. a peal grid KME 0.40 P L Olan ameln dment Review:•pre$ rdents Parkway election ,r'r' ' 1'I £ o t ii ,e �.7,,. + " + r �,( t (t�j LY + , ,, � pro es +aa��, �� a�df � 1 , , ,,M: , u �i �, w4 t �d � ►1 " " , 1 e � t ire decisionsi 3Nt? ry i �'. 041 I M,04, x te ,il l i,s ardxrq . day rUi e ,• for � y 4 : 1 ■ ... y ,pia o 1 ew anl.Swer'l ;and quebiork rr , with' DF .' `i0 '9G Te1ephOne c ox to 1• �+.. "r�,. +. ,.. ' ..idlf , regarding. ,�J 49.6 ,J ,4• Henry K:$rie eta ep ,R;, iii,' �r'om D. Ek t', • iCla"it 04211;9: 4211 90 ,, k e ` ,et ;' d `a2 a yze blight issue; Te Lephono , .;" corferOnce w thfc' ON regara ing agreeront and '',Publie:records.requests Review and anal,yzel ,needed of oirouit couet ohalltftqtgi ',.i,, i Irk' ( � �`nl•' ", , �, �' 4 P �0, y .,� yti , , r II +. !, y 0,50 pamphlet; '25„00 15800 NVV , 00 PEG ,'I , 20 :60.00 PEG 0,40 ', 2000 CH 0,20 " r, y 5,00' TS'R 1, 50 97,50 O'IDONNELL, RAMIS, ELLiorr & CREW ATTORNEYS Al - LAW BALLOW & WRIGHT BUILDING 1727 KW, Hoyt Strut Portland, Or ij n 97209 (503) m-4462 FA X (503) 243- City of Tigard el() Wayne Lowry 13125 S4W. Hall Blvd, P,Oq Box 23397 Tigard Oregon . 97223 GOMPTAOL ER (AAA RENZEMA April 301 1990 Page Client: : 90025` Matter t. 1 Matter:i Trammell Crow Urban Renewal (Cont'e filed. Review and analyze defense strategy for Kane KME 0.30 lawsuits Review and analyze procedural issues JHB 0.30 'regarding challenges to unbar, ren.ewa1. district Review current issues with Liz and TVA; PEG 1.70 Review research on administration :Les distinction. Computer word processing of memorandum to LF 1.50 PEG front Computer word processing of memorandum to LP 0.40 PEG regarding president's parkway. Office conference with DF regarding research PEG 2.00 On LUBA issues; Begin analysis of Kanes 'latest letters. Telephone confer noe with TS regarding TVR 0.50 litigation; Research regarding Kane lawsuit. Review ballot 'title issues. tEC 0.30' Telephone call to . Larry Stadler; Office PEG 2.50 conference with TVR regarding Kane] letters; Review correspondence and analyze response. Receive instructions TVR regarding Henry C'W5 0.20 B ana o Office Conference with PEG regarding ,g ti.rne MMD 2,10 limits for challenging ballot title Legal research regarding hOtic0 Of receipt of ballot title; Telephone call to Secretary of Stag `s off ids regarding' ardin same4 04/17/90 Review and anal ze new Public record request TVR 0,40 from ;Kane Telephone 0411 from Stanley regarding record PEG 5.60 280.00 setover; Complete pleadings) Prepare, file and Serve. Review and analyze Kane correspondence Research tega rd n g b a llot title gvestions r Offioe ce n fsren ce With C Ec regarding same Letter to Eckman 19.50 15,00 40.00 10.00 100.00 • AU-2-9O TUE 15 :24 OPE :C S'Z24 2944 O`fi ONNELL, RAMIE, ELLIOTT & CREW ATTORNEYS AT LAW tiALWINV & WRIGHT BUILDING 1727 NM, Hoyt Hirai Portland, O 4n 72A9 (503) 222-4402 FAX (503) 2432144 City of Tigard c/a Wayne.' Dowry 13125 S.W. rgHalZ Blvd. P.O. Box 23,94. Tigard, .Ore 104 97223 Matters. Tra cell Crow Urban Renewal (Cont.) ; Dte Professional ,Services Rendered 'Telephone call to PaM Burrie, Beaverton attorney, regarding Henry Kane Legal research regarding Kane cases.' Legal reSea Ch regarding challenging a ballot title, 04/16/90' i e ,iew atttd' anal ze additional Kane es Ame '1;t request and demand for advertismen' IO'Iew antd,..analyze public documents requestb p �; << Telephone e call from Liz regarding .Publications by city,; Retriew publications for . neu1raIity o Compose and' . type memorandum to file regarding H. Kane Computer word processing of letter to Oliver Norville, and Donald ' Ekma . 04/19/90 Review alA analyze contract and request. Telephone eall, from and telephone call to 011ie Norville regarding N. Kane; Telephone �g Metro regarding Kane ca1�. to Oregonian West profile: Telephone call to Beaverton ?roes regarding Kane profile Compose and type memorandum to file regarding Norville information. , 0/20/90 Telephone cotttfo ence with DE regarding tame l ` tigetii Office conference with WJS regarding ,research; emOraidum regaraing ` bhallot title challenge. Receipt and review Of development agreements from ?LW and California for similar projects. Coo CoMpose and type memorandum to Don Ektttian regarding Kane Travel to and from Beaverton Va116y Ties regarding Kane articles Revls1ons regarding newspaper files: 0 4 CQMPTF LLEF1 LAuru+ VE ZEMA April 30, 1930 Page Clients 90025 Matter: 1 _ Arty Hours Amount GWS 0.90 27.00' MMD TVR CeC 0.70 0.50 0.50 PEG 0.60 GAS 0.90 LE 0.70 Tyr 0.40 GWS 1.50 21600 32.50 32'5° 30.00 27.00 17.50 26.00 45,00 TVII 5,40 351.00 CW8 2.50 75.00 i G 28--910 TUE 1 3 24 OI E &C 50.324:32944 O' ONNEL,L, RAMIS, EL,110T1' & CREW MTORNXXS AT LAW BAI LOW & WRIGHT BUILDING 1727 N.w. l$oyt Straw Portland Oregon 97109 ($O3) 222 -4402 FAX (503) 243.2944 Ciiy of •Tigard+;, c/o Wayne ` Lowery' ' 13125 SS,Wr,.' Hall Blvd, aO BOX 23397:„ ';'x'tgard,'",,Oregon . 97223 COMPTROLLER �y LAURA RENZEMA April 30, 1990 Page Clients 90025 Matter: 1 Matter: Trammell Crow Urban Pen(awa e (Cont.:), -9' P4-. Professional Services Rendered Atty Hours Amount Telephone oune call to Catty Wheatley regarding SID 0.60 15,00 fling' by PAC, Review statutes on same, Telephone call, to Molly Burns, left re+asage ti 04/23/90 Review and analyze latest item from 'KaAe; PEG 2.60 130.00 Conference with KME regarding council Oeetinq, Draft and dictate memerandum to KME ror cotnmer&t '`; Computer word processing of memorandum to LF 0.80 20 00 TVR and (1E regarding Kane taxation issue. 04/24/90,. Review and 'analyze documents for _disclosure TVR 0.40 26000 to Kane, ?" Telephone call from Molly Burns regarding MMD 0.50 15.00 filing statement of organization for. PAC r MemoranduM to file regarding same. 04/25/90 Telephone conference with OU regarding TVR 0.30 19 a ,0 development agreement Review and analyze complaint from Kane; PEG 2.50 Telephone call �cror Liz regarding school V district; ' elephohe call from Cathy regarding . Kane PAC Computer ward 'pr °casing of memorandum to LF 0.70 17. 50 PEG regarding legislative and Quasi regarding' judicial action) Telephone call from Cathy regarding Kane complaint. 04/26/9'0 IevieW' and analyze Kale complaint; Telephone TVA 1 r 50 97.50 con.ferPnce With DE regarding saMe •review: record with Kathy Wneat:iey' at City PIG 3,00 150 x`00 otd er ~, td respond to He art 1(ar a ";e 'public record; Review 1awPui t . 04/27/90 ' 1tav1ew and analyze possible procedural TVA 1.00 65,00 resPonst s ‘o lawsuit, TelePhone.conference with ON regatding tactics' arid opinion agreement, preparation y 90 146.00 arati.�n o �e�r. lane issues: �� 2 d Respo .d�to��P Petitioners, s'+ Matter': (Cont Date T 1.1 E 1 5 2 5 h,E C 0,:3 c .4 O'DONNEL L, RAMIE, ELLIOTT & CREW ATTORNEYS AT LAW $ALLOW , WRIGHT BUILDING ' 1727 N,W, Hoyt $trett Portland, 0'440119W (503) 212 -4402 FAX (503)243-29.44 City of ,Tigard c /,o Wayne L)wry. 1,312,5y�s', w, HaAll Blvd, A 4d'q' BQX, 2339! ;, Tigard,. Oregon .r 97223 Trammell Crow Urban Renewal ProfssIona1 Services Rendered Computer word Proce si.rig of let' to Oliver Norville and Donald Ekman with oop es of complaint;' Schedule meeting regarding complaint., 04/30/90'' Begin analysis of H. Kane complaints, Research on' .var .ous issues in Kae complaint:, F na1iZe record for Kane; Letter to Kane, Computer word Processing of letter to Henry Kane regarding request for production, i 6 GOMPTROLLUI LAURA fiCN2EMA April 30, 1090 Page Client a 30025 Matter Atty Hours Amount LF 0.80 20,00 CSC 0.54 PEG 0,00 F 0,50 'Total i'. ours it 64.90 T°t81 Services Attorney Recap . • T 'Timothy V. Ramis PEO Phillip E. 6ri.110 P Lori Foster CH Chris Hand KME. Ke'nneth M Elliott MMD Margaret M. ball, JHB Jeff Bachrach C "C Charles E Corrigan, CATS G. William Selzer Disbursement Telephone' Photocopies Hours state 16,50 65,00 27,80 50,00 5.00 25.0n0 1.,00 25,00 0.70 65.00 5.30 30,00 0,30 50.00 1.30 65,00 6,00 30;00 Jmournt 1,072,50 i 390,00 150,00 25,00 45,50 159,00 15400 84,50 180,00 Total Dis u.rso touts current Charges Balatice cuE 3 32.50 0,00 12.50 121.50 0.88 32.S5 33.43 3154.93 r:...: �.... -t 17,264.9€ 4 MJS, EWGr-r & ' ATT RNEYS AT LAW BALLOW 84 WRIGHT BUILDING ' t 1727 N W, lloyt. Str4e 1°4.'1 1 ' ' PDr J *fld� Ono ,son 9720 '6.w New r ow wd w nn ni•lo. - Wri - ..ii iiui rren. ds w.i Iii iiw 19 1 '05i.7.40 773 Matter: 4 O'DONNELL, RAMIS, ELLIOTT & CREW ATTORNEYS AT LAW' BALL OW & WRIGHT BUILDING 1727 N.W. Hoyt Stnxt Portland, Oregon 97209 (503) 222.402 FAX (503) 243 -2944 City of Tigard c/o Wayne Lowry 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Trammell Crow Urban Renewal Prior balance: Payments received: Prior balance less credits: Date` 04/05/90 04/06/90 04/09/90 04/11/90 04/12/90 014/13/90 04/16/90 04/18/90 04/19/90 04/20/90 04/21/90 04/23/90 04/25/90 05/01/90 Professional Services Rendered COMPTROLLER, LAURA RGNZEMA' May 31, 1990 Page Client: 90025 matter: 1 17, 264.98 14,110.05- 3,154..93 Atty Hours Amount Meeting with PEG. DF 2.40 Legal research regarding judicial or DP 5 60 legisaltive decision. Preparation of memorandum to PEG. Legal research regarding judicial v. legislative decision; Conference with PEG. Memorandum to PEG. Review and revise memorandum to PEG; Meeting Re th PEG; Legal research regarding request for legislative findings. Legal research; regarding standards for review of legistative action; Meeting with PEG. Legal research g judicial standards DF 1.09 of review of legislative action. Preparation of outline for memorandum, DF 4.50 Meeting with PEGS Telephone call from Nomille regarding Kane i PEG 0.00` Preparation of memorandum to PEG. DF Preparation of memorandum to PEG. DF 7.80 Computer word processing of memorandum to SC 0.90 PEG from DF regarding legislative and Quasi judicial action, Preparation of memorandum to PEG Finalize draft of memorandum to PEC;., Review and analyze Kane complaint; Meeting to review same. Continue analysis of Kane lawsuit; Conference with TVR regarding', case strategy and options; Draft and dictate Memorandum to file: 72.00 168.00 DF 5.50 165.00 DF 4.50 135.00 DF 2.70 81.00 DP' 5.20 156.00 120,00 135.00 0.00 171,.00 234.00 22.50 DF 6.20 186.00' DF , 1.50 45.00 CEC 2.00 13000` KHp 2.50 125.00 Balance does - net reflect a rrtents received afte 5/ 1 /90 O'DONNELL, RAMIS, ELLIOTT & CREW ATTORNEYS AT LAW SALLOW & WRIGHT BUILDING 1727 N.W. Hoyt Street Portland, Oregon 97209 (503) 222-4402 FAX (503) 243 -2944 City of Tigard c/o Wayne Lowry 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Matter: Trammell Crow Urban Renewal (Cont Date COMPTROLLER LAURA RENZEMA May 31, 1990 Page 2 Client,: 90025 Matter' 1 Professional Services Rendered Attend Chamber of Comrnerece lunch regarding Urban Renewal. Meeting with CEC, KHF and TVR regarding Kane suit, 05/02/90 Review and analyze exclusive agreement; Telephone conference with ON regarding comments Continue preparation of Kane issue 05/04/90 Telephone•conference with PR regarding agreement; Review and analyze agreement extension; Telephone conference with PR regarding same Pull cases on Urban Renewal for Kanes appeals Legal research; Paralegal services. . Co 1.90 ' 05/'07/9 0 DDA conference with D. Ekman regarding TVR 0.20 DA issues, Review and analyze urban renewal cos Telephone call from Liz regarding information, meeting strategy and documents. Organization of documents; Review May 6 Oregonian article 05/08/90 Telephone conference with ON regarding response to editorial 05/09/90' Review and analyze Kane letter regarding intention. to amend complaint. Telephone conference With PR regarding i s sties for Press ; issues for press conference Tele rpss Conference; ` xss i p conference with P.R, regarding same; Telephone conference with Mayor regarding- press conference Telephone call from Liz: regarding pending' issues; Attend meeting at City. 05/10/90 Telephone conference' with ON; Telephone conference With PR regarding process; Conference wi thq PR ands . '� _.toff re: gard�.ng su lemen.taton or a �' g nization; Telephone conference with Don E e law. plan Atty Hours Amount PEG 3.70 ': 185.00 TVR 1.00 65.00 PEG 0.70 TVR 0.70 35.00 50 PEG 2f 00 100,00 CEC 1.50 PEG 0.30. MMD 0.50 TVR 0.20 TVR 1 »80 85.50 13.00. 97.50 15, . 0 0 15.00 13,00 117.00 PEG 3.80 190,00 TVR 3.70 240, 5d Balance doer not reflect paymenbs receivedl after 5,/31./90, Matter: (Cont.) O'DONNELL, RAMIS, ELLIOTT T & CREW ATTORNEYS AT LAW BALLOW & WRIGHT BUILDING 1727 N.W. Hoyt Str ct Portland Oregon 97209 (503) 222.4402 FAX (503) 243 -2944 COMPTR'JLLk.R LAURA RENZEMA City of Tigard May 31, 1990 c/o , Wayne Lowry 3 13125 S . W. Hall Blvd. Client: Bent: 90025 P.O„ Box 23397 Matter: 1 Tigard, Oregon, 97223 Trammell Crow Urban Renewal 05/11/90! 05/14/90 05/15/90 05/21/90 05/22/90 05/'23/90' 05/24/90 Review and analyze letter to editor; TVR 1.30' Telephone conference with fiance officer regarding finance during litigation; Research regarding liability. Review and analyze report regarding KME 0.30 President's Parkway, Review and analyze priority projects PEG 0.50 Legal research regarding federal cases DF 2,50`` "blighted cord ". Continue with last minute issues prior to PEG 0.40 election. Legal research Meeting with PEG. DF 1.80 Office conference with EM and PR regarding TVR 1.50 options Review and analyze response to complaint; Office conference with TVR regarding council options; Telephone conference with H. Kane; Memorandum to file; Telephone call to P. Reily regarding opposing attorney's demands. Meeting with PEG; Receipt and review of Kane DP 1.90 '' complaint and "blighting" cases; Meeting with TVR, PEG, KHF and CEC. Organization of documents; Administrative duties. Preparation of letter to fax to Henry Kane 0.60 regarding our response to his complaint. Review and anal ze strategy y regarding' repeal 1.50 of ordinance; Telephone conference with H. Kane; Memorandum to file. Receipt and review of H, Kane' s mot ion for CEC 0.90 summary judgement Review and analyze procedural Options; Memorandum to file regarding same. Telephone call from Wayne Lowry regarding KHF 0.70 35.00, precondition of financing warrant wpprova:L Review and analyze condition; Conference with Harvey Rogers regarding sanne; TranSrni t documents to Rogers 84.50 19.50 30,00 75.00 20.00 54.00 97.50 CEC 2.40 156.00 AA MM CEC 0.20 57.00 .00 27.00 97.50 58.5 Balance does not reflect payments received after 5/'31/90. Matter: (Cont.) CI'DONNELL, RAMIS, ELLIGIT & CREW ATTORNEYS AT LAW SALLOW & WRIGEIT'BUILDING 1727 N.V. Hoyt Street Portland, Oregon 97209 (503) 222 -4402 FAX (503) 243-2944 City of Tigard c/o Wayne Lowry 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Trammell Crow Urban Renewal COMPTAOI.LER LAURA RENZEMA May 31, 1990 Page 4 Client: 90025 Matter: 1 Date Professional Services es Rendered Atty Hours Amount 05/29/90 Review and analyze Rule 21 motion on Kane KHF 1.30 65.00 lawsuit; Draft and dictate motions and brief. 05/30/90 Draft and dictate Rule 21 motions; Review KHF 2.30 115.00 and analyze additional issues Review record; Conference with Wheatley PEG 1.50 75.00 regarding same. Legal research tax P Y standing. 5 4 5. 05/31/`90 Review and anal ze standing issue for �' ax a er standin . IMF 1..,0 45.00 Y g � Rule KHF 2.30 115.00 21 Motions; Review and revise memorandum in support of motions p , and serve tions • :Pre axle file an. same Total Hours: 108•50 Total Services 4,392.00 Attorney Recap Hours Rate Amount DF Dale Foglesrom 63.30 30.00 1,899.00 PEG Phillip E. Grillo 13.00 50.00 650.00 SC r ).,1� 0.90 25.00 22.50 CRC ' Charles E.I Corrigan rigs.n 8. �0 65.00 539.50 KHF Kenneth H. Fox' 9.10 50.00 455.00 TVR Timothy V. Ramis 10.40 65.00 676.00 CO Crystal Olsen 1.90 45.00 85:50 MMD 3 Daly Margaret M. 0.50 30.00 15.00 .l , 0 KME Kenneth M. Elliott 0.30 1 65.00 19.50 AA Administrative ,Assistants 0.20 15.00 3.00 MM 0.50 45.00 27,00 Disbursements Mileage Cost Photocopies 6 ,,00 50:55 Total DisbUrseim,ehts 56.55 Balance of reflect payments received after 5/31/90 µ ..deer k • 1 o DONNELL, RAMIS, ELLIOTT' & CREW ATTORNEYS AT LAW SALLOW & WRIGHT BUILDING 1727 N.W. Hoyt Street Portland, Oregon 47209 (503) 222 -4402 FAX (503) 243 -2944 Clay of Tigard c/o Wayne Lowry 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Flatter': Trammell Crow Urban Renewal (Cont ) COMP'MROLLER LAURA AENZEMA May 31 1990 Page 5 Client. 90025 Matter n 1 Current Charges Balan.ce due 'A C C 0 U N T AGING Cu,rrel�t over 3 0 Over 6 0 Over 9 9 ?�P448„55 3t15�;93 0L00 •'dotal 0.00 7, 603 , 48 Balance does not reflect payments recejved after 5/31/90. • . 448.55 7,603.48-- Matter: Prior O'1DONNELL, RAMIS, ELLIOTT Y & CREW ATTORNEYS AT LAW BALLOW & WRIGHT BUILDING 1727 N.W. Hoyt Strut Portland, Oregon 97209 (503) 2224402 FAX (503) 243 -2944 City of Tigard c/o Wayne Lowry 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon, 97223 Trammell Crow -LUBA balance: Date 04/09/90 05/01/90 05/03/90 05/09/90 05/16/90 05/17/90 05/21/90 05/22/90 05/23/90 05/24/90 05/25/90 Appeal COMPTROLLER LAURPP RENzr 1A May 31, 1990 Page 1 Client: 90025 Matter: 2 722,56 Professional Services Rendered Ditty Hours Amount Telephone call from Good Samaratin regarding PEG 0.30 15.00 LUBA appeal. Review and analyze Kane theories. TVR 1.30 Con.tinue preparation of Tigard's response to LF 0.70 Petitioners reply. Review and analyze possible settlement concepts Review and analyze taking issue questions. TVR 0.30 19.50 Y y 0.20 5.00 Preparation of fax to Cat'h �1�eatle LF Telephone call from `Bruce Wood. LF 0.20 5.00 Telephone conference with LN TVR regarding 0.20. 13.00 regarding record issues. 84.50 17.50 TVR 0.30 19.50 " Telephone call from Kerrie Standlee. Tel e h rence with K. Standlee p one conference procedure. Telephone conference with EM regarding record. ReVummiewer ' and analyze plaintiff's motion for CEC 1,20 y judgment; Office conference with KHF regarding procedure and response to summary judgment Telephone 'call to Cathy Whealey regarding LF 0.20 LUBA record. LF 0.20 TVR 0.30 5,00 19.50 TVR 0.20 13.00 Total Hours: 5.60 Total Services Attorney Recap Hours Rate Amount PEG Phillip E. Grillo 0.30 50.00 15.00 TVR Timothy V. Ramis 2.60 65.00 169.00 LF Lori Foster 1.50 25.00 37.50 CEC Charles E. Corrigan 1.20 65.00 78.00 Balance does not reflect payments, received after 5/31/90, 78.00 5.00 299.50` Matter: (cont.) D'DONNELL, RAMIS, ELLIOTT & CREW ATTORNEYS AT LAW QALWW & WRIGHT BUILDING 1727 N.W. Hoyt Street Portland, Oregon 97207 (503) 222-4402 FAX (503) 743 -2944 City of Tigard c/o Wayne ,Lowry 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. P.O. Sox 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Trammell Crow LUBA Appeal Telephone Current 300.13 Disbursements COMPTROLLER LAURA RENZEMA May 31, 1990 Page 2 Client: 90025 Matter: Total Disbarsemen.ts Current Charges Balance, due A C C O U N T A O I N G Over 30 Over 60 722.56 0.00 Over 90 0.00 Tctal 022'.6.5 Bal nc does hot reflect payments. received a' 0..63 0.63 300.13 `4 1,022.69 r Matter: 0 DONNELL, RAMIS, ELLI(OTT & CREW City of Tigard c/o Wayne Lowry 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Trammell -Crow & Henry Date 04/27/90 04/30/90 05/k1/90 05,x'32/90 05/03/90 05/07/90 05/18/90 05/20/90 05/21/90 ATTORNEYS AT LAW BALLOW & 'WRIGHT BUILDING 1727 N.W. Hoyt Street Portland, Oregon 97209 (503) 222 -4402 FAX (503) 243-2944 :Kane --C . Ct. Appeal. Professional Services Rendered Review and analyze complaint; Review strategy regarding response. Review and analyze complaint and analyze strategy Conference with TVR, CIE, KHF and PEG regarding analysis of Kane complaint. Legal research regarding transfer of writ review to LUBA; Receive instructions from PEG regarding file. Computer word processing; Secretarial services. Corputer word Processing of letter to _ Henry Kane. Legal research re g arding transfer statute and whether it applies to declaratory proceedings. Review and analyze arguments for response brief. Continue to review and an.ayze priority issues in light of election results. Complete analysis of second claim; Preparation of Memorandum regarding detailed response. Review and analyze options and factor in response to Kane. Outline response brief. Review and analyze additional issues regarding first and third claims for relief; Review strategy regarding Procedural `Motions COMPTROLLER LAURA FRENZEMA May 31, 1990 Page 1 Client: 90025. Matter: 3 Atty Hours Amount' KHF 1.30 65.00 KHF 1.00 50.00 MMD 1.00 30.00 �f MMD 3.00 90.00 and council options Research priority issues regarding standing. 05/23/90 Review and analyze taking cases. 05/24/90 Review and analyze plaintiff's motion for summary audgient Review and analyze strategic 'options, for responding to motion for sulnmar " y Judgment and filing Rule 21 motions. LF 0.80 MMD 2.00 TVR R 4. 0 0 PEG 2.30 PEG 1.80 TVR i,00 20.00 60.00 260.0 115.00 90.00 65.00 KI-IP 2.60 130.00 PEG 2.00 TVR' ' 1.00 KI-IF 1' . 4 0 Balance does not reflect paymelts receiVed after 5/31/90. 100.00 65.00 70.00 O'DONNELL, R AMTS,, ELLIOTT & CREW ATTORNEYS AT LAW SALLOW & WRIGHT BUILDING 1727 N.W. Hoyt Street Portland, Oregon 97209 (503) 222-4402 FAX (503) 243 -2944 City of Tigard c/o Wayne Lowry 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd P.O, Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 COMPTROLLER LAURA RENZEMA May 31, 1990 Page 2 Client: 90025 Matter: 3 Matter: Trammell -Crow & Henry Kane --C. Ct. Appeal Cont.) Date Professional Services Rendered Atty Hours AMount 05/30/90 Telephone conference with newspaper TVR 0.20 13.00 regarding Kane suit; Review and analyze response to summary judgment. Computer word processing of Rule 21 motions. LF 2.40 60.00. 05/31/90 Review and analyze responses to summary TVR 1,00 65.00 judgment. Review and revise Rule 21 motion: CEC 1.50 97.50 Computer word processing of fax to H. Kane GJ 4.80 120.00 regarding Rule 21 motions; Continue Preparation of Rule 21. motions; Telephone call to opposing attorney regarding same; Continue preparation of certificate of service regarding same; Preparation of certificate of compliance and certificate of service; Compose and type letter to court regarding filing; Secretarial services. Tota l Hours: 35.10 Total Services 1,565,50 Attorney Recap KHF Kenneth H. Fox MMD Margaret M. Daly LF Lori {Foster TVR 'timothy V, Rami s P8G Phillip 8. Grillo CEC Charles 8. Corrigan GJ Geraldine A. Deter Hours Rate Amount 6.30 50.00 315.00 6.00 30.00 180,00 3. 20 25.00 8 0. 00 7.20 65.00 468.00 6,10 5 0 .0 0' 305.00 1.50 65.00 97.50 4.80 25.00 120.00 Balance due A C C O U N T A G I N G Current Osier 30 1,565:50 0,00 Over 50 0.00 Over 90 Total 0:00 1,565,50 Balance does not reflect ' payments received after 5/31/90 ,555.50' KeyserMartonAssociatesInc. Timothy C. Kelly Golden Gateway Comenons A. Jerry Keyser 55 Pacific Avenue Mall Kate Earle Funk San Francisco, California 94111 Robert J. Wetmore 415/398 -3050 Fax 415/397 -5065 Michael Conlon Denise E. Conley LOS ANGELES 213/622 -8095 Richard L. l3otti Calvin E. Uollis,11 Kathleen H. Head SAN DIEGO 619/942 =0380 Heinz A. Schilling City of Tigard 13125 SW In1.l Blvd. Tigard, OI.k 9 223 INVOICE FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED RE: Trammell Crow Initial review of Development proposal and request for Redevelopment Assistance, Consulting Services for the Month of Pebruax 1990 Principal 9.00 Hours @ $135.00/Hr. = $1,215.00 Senior Associate 6.50 Hours @'$115.00 /Hr. = 747.50 TOTAL INVOICE AMOUNT $1,962.50 #19650 am Real EstateP!t eveiopment&EvaltationServiccs Timothy C. Kelly A. Jerry Keyser Kate 1 arle Funk Robert J. Wetmore Michael Conlon Denise E. Conley LOS ANGELES 213/622-8095 Richard L. Botti Calvin E. Hollis, 11 Kathleen H. Head SAN DIEGO 619 /942 -0380 Heinz A. Schilling April 25, 1990 City of Tigard 13125 SV Hull Blvd. Tigard, OR 91223 Attention: Patrick Riley Keyser arstonAssociatesInc. Golden Gateway Commons 55 Pacific Avenue Mall San Francisco, California 94111 415/398 -3050 Fax 415/397- -5065 INVOICE FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED RE: Trammell C ro�a Preparation of memorandum evalu .t3r1g the development economics of the President's Parkway Project; conferred with develoPer developer and City staff. Consulting Services for the Month of March 1990 Senior PrxrRr a 1 -1, 2.50 Hours @ $140.00 /Hr. Principal 2.50 [lottrs @ $135.00/Hr. Senior Associate 24.00 Flours @.$11500/1=1r, Associate 8.00 Hours @ $100.00 /Hr. Administrative Staff 1.50 'Fours @ d $ 43 .00 /Hr. TOTAL INVOICE " AMOUNT #19680 am 350.00 337.50 2,760.00 800.00 64.50 $4 , 312 .:00 BealEstateP levelapmeni8,8valuationSeniices HOWARD A. RANKIN DENNIS R VsvROSKY PATRIC J. DOHERTY E. KIMBARIC MacCOLL. JR, PETER R,'MERSEREAU JAMES P SHANNON, LLM KA1 L1 L. OLSON THOMAS W, McPHERSONt LARRY T. COADY CVPIS E. HEIKKINEN KATHERINE G. GEORGES KATHERINE M. ZELKO, L1:M RANIKIN VAVR0sICY DOHERTY MACCOLL & MERSEREAU LAWYERS OLIVER I. NORVILLE OF COUNSEL TELEPHONE 303- 226 - 6400 FACSIMILE: 503- 226-0383 1600 BEN /. FRANKLIN I' AZA' ONE S,W. COLUAMIIA STREETP PORTLAND. OREGON 97258 t ALSO.UCENSED IN CALIFORNIA •ALSO LICENSED IN MICIa.ICAN & COLORADO February 20, 1990 THE CITY OF TIGARD P. O. ; Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 ATTN: Mr. Ed Murphy FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 12.0 hours @ $110.00 per hour $1.,`320.00 Costs advanced Payments received BALP,riC DUE $1,320.00 .1u ATTORNEY] [PLEASE CHECK PAYABLE dO OLIVER I. �IORVILLE, ATT�1Ft MAKE C� Date Matter Hours 01/19 Washington Squa-e ''Project conference with T Ramis, O. D.; ,an, P Reilly, et al. RE preparation of Turban Renewal Plan for Trammell Crow property 01/22 Telephone T. Ramis, Trammell Crow project; research school acquisition -- valuation issue 01/24 Telephone D. Eckman RE meeting concerning Project; to Tigard for conference with P. Reilly, T. Ramis, D. Ekman and D. Blake RE procedure for developing plan and TIP' 01/26 Telephone T. Ramis RE reimbursement agreement; ement; telephone P. Reilly same; telephone D. Ekman same and proposal of plan and disposition and development agreement; telephone C. Etta PP er same 01/1'29 Receive and review letter from D. Ekman RE reimbursement agreement; attorney conference with J. Shannon; telephone T. Ramis RE response 01/30 Attorney conference R8 revisions of reimbursement agreement; telephone P. Reilly same; telephone D. Conley of Keyser Marston RE consultation agreement for review Trammell Crowe pro forma; telephone P. Reilly same 2.5 2.0 4.0 1 5 1.0 1.0 12.0 HOWARD A. RANKIN DEN'NIS R. VavROSKY PATRIC J. DOHERIT E. KIMBARK MacCOLL, JR. PE'T'ER R. MERSEREAU JAMES P SHANNON, ILK' KARL! L. OLSON THOMAS W. McPHERSONt LARRY T., COADY CURTI S E. 2 ETl�r.,c�ToiJ KATHERINE M. ZELKO. ,t.LM RANKIN VAVROSKY DOHERTY. MACCOLL. & MERSEREAU LAWYERS 1600 BENJ. 41tANKUN PLAZA ONE S.W,COLUMBIA STREET PORTLAND, OREGON 97258 OLIVER I, NORVILLE OF COUNSEL FACSIMILE: 503- 226 -0383 TELEPHONE: 503 - 226.6400 f ALSO LICENSED 04 CALIFORNIA ALSO LICENSED IN MICH1pM1 & COLORADO THE CITY OF TIGARD ATTN: Ed Murphy P. O. Box 23357 Tigard, Oregon 97223 FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: Prior balance 37.5 hours @ $110.00 per hour Costs advanced isyir►ents received Statement from Rankin. ' VavRosky BALANCE DUE [PLEASE MAKE CHECK PAYABLE TO OLIVER I. NORVILLE, ATTORNEY) RECEIVE. 6, 't 1 ;a 1990' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEIi' P Date DETAILED STATEMENT Matter Hours 02/05 To Tigard for general conference with staff and consultants on preparation of documents for Trammell Crowe project; review file in preparation for meetings; legal research acquisition of school and compensation 02/06 Review draft plan report, legal research evaluation of school for acquisition attorney conference same 02/07 Review file in preparation for staff meeting on and Report and other documents; attend Rstaff meeting on all Matters 02/08 To Tigard for meeting' with Trammell Crowe and staff on Plan and Report; preparation for meeting; telephone T. Ramis same 02/09 Review file RE Plan and Report; redraft and acqUisitiori section of Plan conference wzth T. ' Ramis RE modifications to Urban Renewal Plan 02/12 1 Review file and Plan Report; review revised Plan; review Report; telephone D. Ekman RE Plan and Rep ort 02;1 Telephone T. Ramis RE status Of Plan and Report 02/13 Review Craft Plan and Report 5.0 5.0 5.0 4 0 40 2.0 4 2,0' Date Matter Hours 02/15 Telephone J. Spencer RE Plan and Report; review Report draft 02/16 Telephone P. Reilly RE status of documents for Tratamell Crowe project; telephone D. Ekman RE Plan and Report; preparation of Development Agreement 02/20 Telephone D. Ekman RE Development Agreement review file same 02/21 Telephone T. Ramis RE Development Agreement with Trammell Crowe; telephone T. Ramis RE Development Agreement with Trammell Crowe; telephone P. Reilly RE Development Agreement and other documents needed review file 02/23 Telephone D. Ekman RE Development Agreement with Trammell Crowe 02/26 Review file re Plan and Report and other matters;, to Tigard for meeting with P. Reilly, E. Murphy, T. Ramis RE status of all matters 02/2` Telephone D Conley RE economic analysis; telephone conference with D. Conley and P Reilly RE same; review file 0 1.0 1.0 1.0, 4.0 1.5 1600 BENJ, FRANKLIN PLAZA ONE S.W. COLUMBIA STREET, PORTLAND. OREGON 97258 CITY OF TIGARD P.O. BOX 2339/ T I CAR D. OR 97223 RANKIN VAVROSKY DOHERTY iACCOLL & MERSEREAU LAWYERS FEDERAL I.D. NUMBER 93.0676252 FACSIMILE 503- 226 -0383 FOUNDED IN 'IRSS AS TELEPHONE: 503-226-6400 SMITII & TEAi. MARCH 0, 1990 Please Detach and Return With Payment BILL NUMBER: NOF MATTER: 21090700 2100 FOR SERVICES RENDERED RE: TRAMMELL. CROW 1/15/90 OFFICE CONFERENCE WITH MR. NORVILLE RE PROPOSED URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT 1/22/90 OFFICE CONFERENCE RE METHOD OF `VALUING SCHOOL PROPERTY TO BE PURCHASED; REVIEW CASE LAW RE SUBSTITUTION AND REPLACEMENT VALUE ON , CONDEMNATION. 1/23/90 OFFICE CONFERENCE; COMPUTER ASSISTED LEGAL RESEARCH ON REPLACEMENT VALUE IN CONDEMNATION CASES. 1/24/90 MEETING WITH CITY OF TIGARD AND TRAMMELL CROW REPRESENTATIVES RE ESTABLISHMENT OF URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT. 1/26/90 PREPARE COST REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT. 1/25/90 0/90 WESTLAW RESEARCH ON CALCULATING SUBSTITUTION DAMAGES ON CONDEMNATION OF PURL I C •SCHOOL. /26/90 RESEARCH PROPER COSTS TO 133E PAID IN CONDEMNATION ©F SCHOOL DISTRICT; WESTLAW RESEARCH. i/29/90 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH IMR, EI(MAN RE REVISIONS TO COST 'REIMBURSEMENT' AGREEMENT; REVIEW CORRESPONDENCE RE ; REVISIONS TO COST REIMBURSEMENT AO E MENTe TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH MR NORVILLE RE ;MR, EKMAN °S COMMENTS TO COST REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT, RANKIN VAVROSKV DoI•I RTi' MACCOLL & MERSEi REA J , !1 1600 BENJ. FRANKLIN PLAZA ONE S.W, COLUMBIA STREET PORTLAND. OREGON 97258 CITY OF TIGARD R,ANKIN VAVROSKY DOHERTY MACCOLL & MERSEREAU LAWYERS FOUNDED IN I$85 A.S SMITH & TEAL MARCH 8, 1990 Please Detach, and Return With Payment FOR SERVICES RENDERED RE: TRAMMELL CROW FEDERAL I.D. NUMBER 934676252 FACSIMILE 503-226-0383 TELEPHONE 503 - 2264400 PAGE: 2 I /30/90 REVISE COST REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT; TRANSMIT E SIR. REILLY AND MR. RAMIS: 2/2/90 MEETING WITH CITY OF TIGARD OFFICIALS RE FORMATION. OF URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT, 2/6/90. RESEARCH AT MULTNOMAH LAW LIBRARY, NICHOLS ON , EMINENT DOMAIN, CONFERENCE THEREON. 2/6/90 CONFERENCE RE URBAN RENEWAL. DISTRICT. 2/0/90 OFFICE CONFERENCE WITH CITY OF TIGARD AND TRAMMELL CROW REPRESENTATIVES ..... N OF URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT. RE:Y'AB$.. ESTABLISHMENT 2/9/94 2114/90 CAS REVIEW LAW ON REPLACEMENT VALUE CASE AS PROPER MEASURE OF FAIR MARKET VALUE., RESEARCH APPLICABILITY OF SUBSTITUTION ALUE TO DETERMINE FAIR MARKET VALUE ON CONDEMNATION. ar��C� RE STATUS: RESE�� RE REPLACEMEN NVALU CON��'ER 2/ �9/9t3 RESEARCH RE REPLACEMENT VALUE •AS MEASURE. OF FA I i 6 aAR1 ET ' ALUE 2/20/90 RESEARCH RE PAYMENT OF 54:3STIT►4TE vALu tiN CtNDEMNAT I GIN. E RANKIN VAVR(SK,.e E)01-IERTY MALCOLL St MERSEREAU 1600 BENJ. FRANKLIN PLAZA ONE S.W. COLUMBIA STREET PORTLAND, OREGON 97258 CITY OF TIGARD RANKIN VAYROSK1' DOHERTY MACCOLL & MERSCREAU LAWYERS FOUNDED IN MI5 AS SMITH &.'T'EAL MARCH 8, 1990 PAGE: 3 FEDERAL ID, NUMBER 93.4676252 FACSIMILE 503 - 226-0383 TELEPHONE: 503 - 226.6400 Please Detach and Return With Payment FOR SERVICES RENDERED RE: T AP7MELL CROW :2/22/90 d'J RESEARCH REGARDING REPLACEMENT VALUE AS PROPER MEASURE OF DAMAGES. OFFICE CONFERENCE WITH CITY OP TIGARD E STATUS, 2/27/90 RESEARCH RE SUBSTIT � SUBSTITUTION VALUE. 2/28/90 RESEARCH RE REPLACEMENT VALUE ON CONDEMNATION. 3/2/90 INITIAL DRAFT OF MEMORANDUM RE AVAILABILITY OF SUBSTITUTION AND REPLACEMENT VALUE ON CONDEMNATION OF SCHOOL. 3/5/90 REVIEW AND REVISE MEMORANDUM- FEES; 4, 521. 50 COSTS ADVANCED: (SUMMARY) TELECOMMUNICATIONS COPIES 15.00 (SUMMARY) WORD PROCESSING DOCUMENT PROD, TOTAL , C OSTS ADVANCED: n....:.. ..._'....;.. 24. L S CURRENT BALANCE: 4i 546. 30 PLEASE PAY THIS AMOUNT 4i 546.tIO RANKIN VAVROSt Y bO HERTY MACCOLL & MEkSEkEAtI_ HOWARD A. RANKIN DENNIS R. VavROSKY PATRIC J, DOHERTY E. KIMBARK MncCOLL, JR. PETER R. MERSEREAU JAMES P SHANNON. U.M. KARLI L. OLSON THOMAS W. McFHB:SONt LARRY T. COADY CURTIS E.,HEIKKINEN KATHERINE M, ZELKO, LLM THE CITY OF TIOARD ATTN: Ed Murphy P. 0. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 RANKIN VAVROSKY DOHERTY MACCOLL & MERSEREAU LAWYERS ROUNDED IN 1885 AS SMITH Rt. TEAL 1600 BENJ. FRANKLIN PLAZA ONE S,W, COLUMBIA STREET PORTLAND, OREGON 97258 March 31, 1990 FOR <`PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: Prior balance 29.0 hours @ $110.00 per hour Costs advanced $9,991.30 rl'90.00 Payments received 1,320.00. Statement from Rarnkin,, VavRosky BALANCE DUE $11861.30 OLIVER I NORVILLE OF COUNSEL' FACSIMILE S03- 226 -0383 TELEPHONE: 503.226 -6400; t ALSO LICENSED IN CALIFORNIA °ALSO LICENSED IN MICHIGAN & COLORADO tPLEASE MAKE CHECK PA YAELE TO OLIVER z ...: . NORVI%LE , ATTORNEY] ' /ll /7d iEGE�VED ..AE R. G 1990 1 r 14 D 'TAILED STATEMENT Date Matter Hours 03/01 Redraft acquisition and disposition section of Plan; disclaimer ' of funding in report; transmit to E. Murphy, ; T. Ramis and P. Reilly 03/02 Review Trammell Crowe draft of DDA 03;/05 " Review material on changes in Plan, report and other' documents in ;preparation for meeting with City Council; telephone E. Murphy re City Council briefing; ; to Tigard attend Council briefing (13/°6 Telephone T. Ramis result of Public hearing; telephone D. Conley re status of economic study; telephone` D. Ekman re DDA 03/01 Telephone D. Ekman re DDA; telephone 7'. Ramis . same; review draft DDA in file and preparation for conference; conference D. Ekman and T,, Ramis re DOA and ' ob j ec t:ioons of Winmar to Plan; telephone J. Riordan and D. White, et al. re objections of Winmar; telephone D. Conley re economic report 03/08 Draft telephone • p th�.tep� same, agreement tel e ho ne T. Ramis, sa �e� telephone 8. Murphy p Ekman, same; telephone D. White same telephone of Winmar to artici P pata.on in Master Plan requirements in comprehensive P 1 an amendment 03/09 To Tigard for conference with P. Reilly, E. Murphy, D. Blake and D. Ekman re conference and Plan amendment, 'Master Plan, EDF et al,; telephone D.' White re response to Winmar objections; telephone P. Reilly Same 1.5 1.0 3.0 100 3.5 4` . 0 5.0 RE TIGARD Date Matter Hours 03/12 Receive and review report by Keyyser- Marston; receive and review comments by LCDC' on Comprehensive Plan Amendment, receive and review comments by LCDC on Comprehensive Plan Amendment; receive and review memo from D. Ekman on DDA and outline Agreement; review materials for City Council on ordinance approving Plan and referring to voters Cotuprehensive Plan Amendments, et al. telephone P. Reilly re Council meeting 03/13 Telephone P. Reilly re Council approval of Plan; telephone D. Ekman same and DDA; telephone T Ramis same and DDA 03/15 Telephone D. Ekman re preparation DDA; telephone T. Ramis same; review file 03/16 file in Pee E►oAaconfe�ence�wiing with with Blake, Ekman and Ramis re DDS, p Owner- Participant 03/22 Tele hoYte D. White re Agreement with Winmar 4.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 10 HOWARD A. RANKIN DENNIS R. VavROSKY PATRIC L DOHERTY E. KIMBARK MacCO L, JR, I'ErER R. MERSEREAU JAMES P ,SHANNON, LIM• KARL! L.;OLSON THOMAS W. Mc@HERSONt CURDS E. FIEIKKINEN KATHERINE M. ZELKO, LLM RANKIN VAVROSKY DOHERTY MACCoLL & MERSEREAU LAWYERS POUNDED 'IN 1885 AS SMITH & TEAL i600 IJENJ. FRANKLIN PLAZ/, ONE S.W. COUJMrnA STREET FORII.AND; OREGON 97258 OLIVER!. NORVILLE OF COUNSEL FACSIMILE; 503- 226-0383 TELEPHONE: 503- 226.6400 THE CITY OF TIGARD ATTN Ed Murphy P. O Eox 23397 Tigard Oregon 97223 Prior balance $11, 861.30 22.`0 hours @ $110.00` per noun 2,420.00 Costs 'advanced 1.1,861.30 $ 2, 42 0.0 0 . [PLEASE MAKE CHECK PAYABLE TO OLIVER r , NORVILLE, ATTORNEY] Date DETAILED STATEMENT Matter Hours 04/01 Telephone D. White RE Owner /Participant Agreement with Winmar- telephone P. Reilly RE matters for meeting; to Tigard for conference with P. Reilly, T. Ramisr E. Murphy, et al. RE activities to be May completed before Ma 15th ' election 04/03 Telephone D Ekman RE appeal on Comprehensive Plan Amendment; work and reimbursement by Trammel]. Crow prior to election 04/05 Telephone D. Ekman RE drafting interim DDA 04/11 Telephone P. Reilly RE DDA with Trammell Crow; telephone T. Ramis RE status of appeal RE Comprehensive Plan Amendment; DDA with Trammel_ Crow; telephone D. White RE Owner /Par t,c ipant' Agreement with Winmar 04/19 Review file for preparation of exclusive negotiating agreement with Trammell Crow; review file for forma of Owner /Participant Agreement with Winmar; review correspondence from H. Kane RE threat of litigation; telephone W. Selzer RE request for information on H. litigation; finals same; Kane lx.tY atxon research Tin telephone P. Grillo RE H. Kane request for production of documents; research records same: 3,0 15 3.5 • roan RE pr ep. Exclusive us Telephone D. y 04/24 Negotiating AGk aration of 9 j g greement with Trammell Crow; telephone P. Reilly, same; work on Agreement 04/26 Review file in preparation for drafting Exclusive Negotiating Agreement with Trammell Crow; receive e and review OP Agreement form for Winmar 2., 0 • Date Matter Hours 04/27 Draft letter to Trammel Crow RE preparation of Exclusive Negotiating Agree- ment; deliver to D. Ekman; telephone P. Reilly same, telephone D. Ekman same; telephone T. Ramis same, and H. Kane complaint, telephone D White RE Winmar Owner/Participant Agreement draft Exclusive Negotiation Agreement 04/27 Draft Exclusive Negotiation Agreement with Trammell Crow, ''telephone D. Ekman same, receive and review complaint in Kane v. City of Tigard 4,0 4.0 TOWARD A. RANKIN: DENNIS R. VavROSKY PATR1C J DOHERTY E. KIMBARK MacCOLL, JR. PETER R. MERSEREAH JAMES P. SHANNON, LLM" KARLI L OLSON THOMAS W. McPHERSONf LARRY T. COADY CURTIS E. HEIK! INEN KATHERINE G. GEORGF.S KATHERINE M, ZELKO, LLM THE CITY OF TIGA.RD ATTN: Ed Murphy P, O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 RANK IN VAVROSKY DOHERTY MACCOLL & MERSEREAU LAWYERS F OR PROFESSIONAL ; :. SERVICES: FOUNDED IN 1885 AS SMITH & TEAL 1600 IIENJ, FRANKLIN PLAZA ONE S.W. COLUMBIA STREET PORTLAND, OREGON 97258 May 31, 1990 OLIVER 1. NORVILLE OF COUNSEL TELEPHONE: 503- 226 -6400 FACSIMILE: 503- 226 -0383 t ALSO LICENSED IN CAUEORNIA ALSO LICENSED IN MICHIGAN Be COLORADO '7 '09O COMMUIAITI D {E1.QPMENT Prior r balance $2,'420.00 12.5 hours @ $110.00 Per hour 1 375.00 Costs advanced' Payments received Statement from Rankin, VavRosky (Attached) BALANCE DUE 2,420eO0 1 •105. 75 2 480,. 75 d [Pi;E.,5E MAKE CHHGCK PA A8 E TO OLIVER Zm NORVTLLE, A TORMB '] f,4 ut std 1600 BENJ. FRANKLIN, PLAZA. ONE S.W. COLUMBIA STREET PORTLAND; OREGON 97258 MR. PATRICK J. REILLY CITY OF TIGARD P.O RIO 23397 TIGARD OR 97223 FOR SERVICES RENDERED RE: 3/1/90 3/2/90 3/5/90 3/6/90 FEES: COSTS ADVANCED &.NKIN VAVROSKY DOHERTY .,VLACCOLL & MERSEREAU LAWYERS FOUNDED IN 1885 AS SMITH &TEAL MAY 210 1990 BILL NUMBER: 21108 REDERA9L LD..NUMBER 3. 0676252 FACSIMILE: 503 226 -0383 TELEPHONE: 503 - 2266400 CLIENT: 21090700 MATTER: 2100 Please Detach and Return With Payment TRAMMEL CROW COMPANY RESEARCH CONDEMNATION OF PUBLIC FACILITIES; RESEARCH CONDEMNATION - OF `'PUBLIC FACILITY AND DICTATE MEMORANDUM; PREPARE MEMORANDUM RE CONDEMNATION OF PUBLIC FACILITIES PREPARE MEMORANDUM RE CONDEMNATION OF PUBLIC FACILITIES. (SUMMARY) LEXIS LEGAL RESEARCH (SUMMARY) TELECOMMUNICATION` COPIES TOTAL COSTS ADVANCED 810. 00 276 75 19. 00 295. 75 CURRENT BALANCE: 1:105.75.° PLEASE PAY THIS AMOUNT! 1#105.,75 RANKIN VAVRoSit DONE tTY MACCOLL'+& MERSEREAt.'. n of • • V&00 BENJ. FRANKLIN PLAZA ONE S.W. COLUMfBIASTREF: PORTLAND, OREGON 9725E RANKIN' VAVROSKY DOHERTY MACCOLL & MERSER :AU LAWYERS FOUNDED IN Ill85 AS SMITH & TEAL FEDERAL I.D. NUMBER 93.0676252 FACSIMILE: 503,226 -0363 TELEPI ION E: 503.225.6700 R CEivED JUL 1 7 1990 0 mum CITY OE T I GARD 21090700 P. 0. BOX 23397 7/12/90 TIGARD, OR 97223 Please Detach and Return With Payment 2100 TRAMMEL CROW COMPANY BALANCE FORWARD: 1, 105. 75 MATTER TOTAL; 1, 105. 75 TOTAL BALANCE DUES 1 105.75 STATEMENT BALANCE ,FORWARD NT CHHRGS PAYMENTS BALANCE DUE RECAP c��R�E 00 1 105. 75 AGING CURRENT 1 MONTH' 2 MONTHS 2+ MONTHS BALANCE DUE 1, 1.05. 75 ► 105. 78, tAN ►CCN VAVROSICY DOF%ERTy. MVMACCOLL t MER18EREAU t AwYrkq 12 February, 1990 Ed Murphy, Director Community Development Department City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Billing: #1: Trammell -Crow Development For professional services related to the r ... s .q t ' ' r M, r'd.� �. D ,w�.iwaq iti Va t�. M C'1 % f, • r i"'• w• .+ C a. C7.� as �t'G 4 a 4 � • aw a. rs, eiax y aw aw V L 1, .:, �.• aaav a a a.. ate' 3. • . v e....r.r • n renewal Plan) and comprehensive plan amendments necessary to carry out the development plan per our agreement dated 29 January, 1990 For work performed between January 26 thru February 7, 1990 Net with, you to discuss project, attended meetings, reviewed preliminary draft urban renewal plan, report, staff report, prepared memos advising city on issues and strategy- January 56 hrs @ $70 100 mi @ .30 Copies, fax,etc. ebr ira.ry 1 thrU 7 49-5 hrs @ $70 155 m]. @ .30 Copies 0, fax, etc. Th'a k y'oU 6,/ Total. Bil1inC John C. Spencer SPENCER & Ki1PPER 3045 NW Thurman Portland, OR 97210 $3920.00 30.00 24,70 311`. i° $3465.00 46.50 00.00 $7466,2 R CEIVED F:B 1 4 1990 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT bt Pd 4 9 larch, 1990 . Ed Murphy, Director Community Development Dept City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Rea Billing 02 Trammell Crow Development Purchase Order #E:05195 For professional services related to the President's Parkway Development Plan (urban renewal plan) and comprehensive plan amendments necessary to carry out the development plan per our agreement dated 29 January, 1990. For work performed between February 8 thru February 28, 1990 147 hrs @ $70 260 mi @ S.30 Copie , fax, etc. Total Total Billing Thank You- SPENCER & KUPI'ER John C. Spencer 3045 NW Thurman Portland, OR 97210 97� tftv $ 10,290-00 78.00 281.00 $ 10,649.00 C'aldivitlit r , OLTELOPMENt 1,0,649.00 '3 /9 27 March, 1990 Ed Murphy, Director Community Development Department City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: : Billing #3: Trammell -Crow Development Purchase Order E06195 For professional services related to the President's Parkway Development Plan (urban renewal plan) and comprehensive plan amendments necessary to carry out the development plan per our agreement dated 29 January, 1990 For work performed between March 1, 1990 thru March '15, 1990: Prepared eratta for urban renewal plan, report, staff report, and comprehensive plan text. Prepared, for and attended Council work session and public hearings. Prepared final adopted version ff urban renewal plan and report. Prepared memo on p activities. 81.5 hrs @ $70 115 mi @ .30 Copies, fax, etc. John Subtotal' 5,705.00 34.50 296.00 6035.50 AmoUnt past due $ 10,649.00 Total due 16,684.50 Pencer SPBNCER & KUPPER X045 NW ThurMan , Portland. OR 9/210 • 9 1'tw't L1 U 199 5 JUne, 1990 Ed Murphy, Director Community Development Department City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Billing':; Presided ' s Parkway Workshop For professional services related to Parkway Project per your request. For work performed during May, 1990. Prepared for and attended public workshop. 4.5 hrs @ $70 55 mi @ .30 Copies, fax, etc. 315.00. 16.50 18.45 Total 349.95 Thank you. John C Spencer SPENCER & 1IPPFR 3045 NW Thurman Portland, OR 97210 FICEIVED J. 4 7 1990 cOMMUNDY DEVEI,DIIENT R'tIV'D I" 1990 C nMUN1TYDEVEtQ MEND PHON TELEPHON - ?A -E'TO SEE:VOU Wt�ti`Tl SEE"VPU Or YOUR OAt 036/1BER E OAF: �!Lt. OALL AWA!N H, EMI., A IVTl J F34 01-03 INu TOTAL (i1 ii' 111;,,,X11,Z: TORS- " w 8 et, Jr. it ,mot R. •. ; W J.H. H.R F.R T' Jack ,thl' • J 1010 Grand Ave. ty, MO 84141.8228 (T: 1EI TINGE in Apr. at , slifi STOCK DA1' . ' 3 POWER- One vo1 y'," :lion of directors. :' "HOLDERS- Dec. 3 `r I, 1988, W.T, and R.' 28.0% of the Com. an 6.7% (847,080 and.) FER" AGENT- United: le N. A., itaneaa CiW'y1 RANGE- OTC ...2613/to 26 A4 ` •1881. 31 h 293/4 h11983 24 23 11981. . 243/+ 22'/4 c1979•' . "for -2 split paid Jan: 388; bet., 39 +h -38,; stk, died, Dec.-j; 7% stk, divd, Dec. 19; 96 stk. divd. Dec. 17''' )% stk, divd. Dec.'10`µ 3% stk. divd. Dec. 1.0 ;• 34) stk. divd., Deo. i7; ao stk. divd. Dec. 19• T DIVIDENDS- Com.. 2).b111.,, for -2 spilt paid Jan.: 10.25 1988- , . 1, 0% stk. in•Dec, of ea'" % stk. pd. each Jar, preceding Dec, /. y or predecessor -heft year since 1927. ` EARNINGS. AND FIN RS- Touche Rosa''�,a'l i #'�"tF'i. ARMS., Y -E Doc, 3Y,'. Total Mt, Inc, '. gl8,671 7,870 ' 207,388 fie 203,741. TA. 200,238 3, 8429 eve STATI Allow fo Dec. 31Totel '` Book t ° Consote ®aI: '3heetrDec 31 Thou. $ ; ,fi , ,.,..,, '- , . "" 61+...1988 1987 t Loan Losses Aeeets ' Value 1Loana & leaeea "' `'r -MILS- ,,ti397,03� r,292,8�9 Per Sh. ; , Lesa: Unearned e ee , „,. t y 309 27 t 3,714 , rr. , ' ' .. , r . ,.. r, , . ;.. 14 , �, 23.25 ,.dint ®rest 8,}�14,9�8�' ' • g..288' 283 19 3,650 27.38 ' ' ', Allow, for loan 16 3,203 .t"' 21.52 lose a "' �'tp k: 27.123' ,t, ' ..18,788' 260, 237 14 2,878 ' 28.27 Net loan &: • , l E1,0' «, r7�., N,o. N.R. ' '- 2,922 • r 25.36 . leases t » .1' ,464,9911 1284 786 •Non -Per• Grove Loans & . ; forming Deposits Lease Finan, , Assets -Mil. $- 3,110 , N/A 3,100 tees `'' N/A 2,764 1,200 NIA 2,439 1,188 - N/A 2,029 1,040 N/A Is non - accrual and renegotiated loans; M Keeciosed real estate. '� STATISTICS, Dec..31: ` t • Gross Grose , Total Book g➢ Erne. Degas. Assets Value s,o, $ Mil. $ Mu. $ -Per Sh.- 210 1,887 - 2,839 27.31 226 1,781 - 2,719 • • 26.71 216 1,567. 2,306 27.08 129 1279 1,7 6 2690 ling of: M(I, $ Domoatic Domestic Demand Time Cash & in banks, ".4,647,378 ' ' 677,944 U,S, Govt. & agency ; ,, ' , r f , , sees At ' .. ?,t; w 1,088,097 ,•:;,,,„•,„ 850,100 State & music, secs. :r .,! }`',172,451. „ 1111 264,580 Other secs 12,302 12,088 Fed. funds sold & reeell agmta , .w0 >' "862,115 �''« ' -2116+ 123 Aced. (nt. rec " y `ex48;790 '' .38,997 Trading acct. secs . ` ^ ^ • 23,719 iG 23,137 Oth. earn. assets ,,`r'� '" >. • 9'47.. ,i ur ' ,''250 Bank prem. & equipar" ''80,169 `.f '1 '88091 Premises on' pur- e -r'f 1'.: , ' chased banks ..,21,721 3 fi' . '22,73 Other;easets 26,894 23,78 Total assets 3,713,888 3,549,590 Liabilities -- .k f,,kruy •r"CJir)' .ut.rlt:.A vides asset -based financing for customere,:of'Co,'a aubaIdlariea and for corporateeettatomers. nation- wide. , . ' ,� ,,Dec, 31,. 1988, telephone. companies, had 11,878,000 access lines in service, of -which 47%, were in the metropolitan erect of Denver/Des Moines, Mlnneapolie•St, Patti, Omaha, Phoen, Portland, Salt Lake City, Seattle, and Tacoma; and 26% were in other metropolitan areas. Sizable' areas In the terri- tory which the telephone companies operate, were served by non - affiliated telephone companies. SUBSIDIARIES- wholly owned or noted- U S WEST Communications Group„ Inc. ' Mountain States Telephone &, Telegraph (dba'11 S WEST Commun(oetiona) : 18, .,t Fl:. Pacific Northwest Bell Corp. , Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.. U S WEST Marketing Resources Corp'. 0. Trans Western Publishing Co. w r.T.-,:AAM Plus, Inc. >.�`� , .. y., 0 US WEST investments, inc. „ .. ) 6' -,BetaWestPropertleo, Inc. • .. • , ! !Applied Communications Inc., • c, 'r ° -t., r , d ., „ Applied Computer Equipment Sales, Inc, , Transaction Systems Architecha, Inc, t :Applied Commulcatione.1 .K, Ltd. ACIBASE Twenty -Four Licensing ,B.V. t. ACI Canada Efts, Ltd. elemalics a, Gulf Cellular, Inc, • " a r*,-; 1, Western Range Insurance Co. .'� . ,,r , ., ' Company has several other'wholly 'owned* sub- si'dtaries with the name U 9 West In their titles. �iliONSTRUCTION EXPENDITURES, Yrs. End, Thou. $ 1988,.,,.,., 2,294,000. 987 ., ..,, ,1;;1,908,000 1988,,,,,,.,,,, 2,282,000 1985,..,....... ..2089,000 84,...:..,..a 1,774,000 1983 "''1,568000 1982 ,,. 2,113,000 1981 , 1111 " 2,391,000 1980,,...,...., 2,244,000 1979 ...,....... 2,101,000 EMPLOYEES- Deo. 31,- 1988, 69,765. 'ACCESS LINES, Deo. 31 :'Thou. - •-• 198811,878 1907 .,... 11,613 1988 ,.... 11,332 1985,..., 11,167 1984 10,871 1983 10,810 ,1982..... 10,387 1981,,.. '10,438 1980.,.,„ 10,128 Deposits. - Non int.-bearing e,t3kr "- - deppos 1,084,112 , to ,. Iss 1,401 • Int, •bearing de- 1 170 832 ,7 P00 1111 996,488 al' 960,38.7 ".10.i161 ,108 718 . . , ........ 849 1111,. 001... 600 800K VAL, for Dec. '84 &'81 `18%, Dec, 'KW, '83, Deo. '82, D;,,;,'80, Dec. '79 8, Dec. let etc divde,: $ 1982 1981 1980 1979 20.06 10,50 15.87 13.99 Inc, TaXee ar,ol(i' •" 0,679' 4, an.11 to 8,182 •tt1 cre00 1'131 5.913, on. 6,588 cr337 fed by Co, edjtd, .414 el, v, for loan Ibises.', 3,933, 1985, 8,253'- 13,339. .. 43,1 • t. on deposit©: gh /0; 1985, 1011,830 4: 1988,121,324. re" S. for Dec. '88 3 -f:, 14 1983 e .o0 3 Z,13 t RNS,, Y -E Dec, 31 Not Op, Earns,- '. tau. $ , *Per Sh:°> 3,290 �; 4.1391 1,88 5.02 3,122 .ti, a.G00, 1,859 r 38 3' t'ad by Co, . Pfts.: Then. 'V "+1 891 1981' d310 197 di t-041. FINS, for Dec,4' 1 sc. '81 16 %'& ale 0:$ 982 1 1931' 1111. 3.2 ,84 3,3 *fad, told a risen i acct. 1111,.. 1938 11987 f1986 139,438 125,423 130,430 88,889 78,713 04,178 28,961„ . 11,401 • 10,468 1,474 1,474 1,944 9 t` 799 388 258,571 217,870 207,388 121,324 107,894 108,340 6,244 6,272 2,920 :,,1111.,, 14,624 2,323 2,256 141,092 115,489 111,510, 116,479 102,381 95,872 13,339 6,491 9,220 102,140 94890 86,852 . t,• oe '22,726 20,480 18,704: 17,134 18,189 13,989' o'' 5,686 2,810 2,713 r • Totakf pos........ "3,1 *0,397 { "3,100,306 ,Fee.•tli'nds'sold & `i ,�i ti redell agmta , .y.,.,,: . , 'l80,O40 , 32,772 Accruals ., 42,861 . ,. , 47,538 Notes pay. .... re. 71,761 70,601 Other !labs ,.> ,.::...,.. ^ tr, a 14,093 « *y; ,16,109 ,Cam, stk p. 912.60 „�, j'187,872 • •..,« 159,988 aTreae. stk ............... dr4,448 ,r dr3,907 Surplus 34,867 28,198 , i9 Retain. earns....., ...,110,285 ,,, 100,989 Total !lobs 11113,713,888 ,, 3,549,950 iSf1a,: , 13,429,779 12,798,882 aShs.: �r ,,159,093 142,020 'u S NEST,: Inc. �' ' ' "rt, CAPITALIZATION (Dec. 31,'88) :., ., ., LONG TERM DEBT (Thou, to (Thou, S)) 2 /a6 /,% Debt ., .1' $410,000 co 8% -8'/o% Debt . �,:u,..,, ., ,........ .. 3,788,800 litI 9%- 123/6% Debt 1111 ' t...,. 2,35'1,800 an 12'h%•13'h96 Debt f�' , . 71,400 m Other,,.,.., .,..,..1. *.,..' 68,200 re TOTAL (exci. $373,300,000 .: - • ' "' • ' ' " d.' Notes • of •• *$8)879,800 A7& cur+. port on) irrb incI. 8% eft (t S .WEST Capital Funding, Inc. . ;, 1 Note; For S&P Ratings on publicly hold debt see Bond Description below. , ,, . ,.. STOCK- ' . 4,4 AUth. She, Outetg.'.Shs. Preferred $1 par 60,000,000 .' None Common no par,...,.., *500,000,000 1182,642,341 ' •Incl. aha. for Dividend Reinvestment and Stock " Purchase Plan, Employee Stock Ownerehip Pian,and several other employee stook plena, ., ,,, tExol,- 10,588,705 in treat. :o ,l; 1.1, „.. ' SHORT TERM DEBT totalled $916,000,000" =at Dec. 31, 1988, lnclUding $74,400,000 bank loans, $488,200,300 dommerclal paper, $373,300,000 Cut- rent portion of king-term debt, and $100,000 Other, UNUSED LINES' OP CREDIT` • tetpled' $773,000,000 at Dec. 31, 1988.._'i,tt. ,ti r •• • I ',tr ' "INCORPORATED in Colo. iii 1983, as one of,tho van regional holding companies formed ppursuant the Modification of Final Judgement (MFJ) or nsent decree) which arose out of the antitrust gation brought by the Department of Juatice'(00,1), d agreed to by AT &T and the DOJ with certain odlficationa which the U.S. District Court, D.C. had aired. ' • ' , - 'Aug. 24, 1982, the Consent Decree between T and the DOJ was entered by the Court follow d amldaf by .tips lat(on' of the DOJ'a 1974 civil antitrust action involving AT&T end Its aubsidiarlea, Terms of the Consent Decree.. +spored that AT &T divest those eerie of the Bell System operating telephone companies that provide exchange tele- communications and exchengo access service, as Weil' as printed directory advertising and collular advanced mobile cornmunlcatione eervlce, and else required termination at the license • contracts between AT &T and the operating companlee and the standard supply contracts between Western Electric and the operating companies. ' ' err • « Jan, 1, 1984, in connection with the,AT &T dives- titure, Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co., 1'lorthweetern Bell Telephone Co, and Paolfic North- west Sell Telephone Co, became°subeidlarisa of Co, AT &T then transferred ownership directly- tb its shareholders htole e{ srhg eb each AT&T aehd rec ed one hae of each regional holding company for, each ten shares hold. • , a!s,•,, 4. n. May 20, 1988, purchased arpx 3,900,006 Coin, shares (98.5% of the outetg. Com.) of Applied Cam• municat ono Inc, (ACl) pursuant to an offer (expired May 18, 1988) to purchase all ACI Com, shares at $27 a share made by USWIS Acquieltion Co., e a eubeidfary of Go. U on ox Iratio subeidlery.ai U S WEST Information S stems, Inc.; in' ring, each remaining ACI ehere oipftatg. Wait 6011 verled into the right to receive $27 in cash.., N� OFFICERS - ;J.A. MacAllister, Chrm & Chief Exec Officer R.D. McCormick,' Prete& Chief Oper Ofitcer H.P. Doerr, Exec V -P & Chief Financial Officer LW, DaMuth, Jr., Exec V -P, Gen Counetil & Secy Medlson, Exec V -P ' H.J. Callahan, Exec V -P C.M Lfiiis, Exec V P J.T. Anderson, V -P & Trade,. D.1, Brenner, V -P & Conti, .A. Hardin®, V-P R. Band, VP Judith A, Servoes, V -P C.S. McCiollan,: V•P t#.E, Melee', V «P W.J, Wade, V-P H.L. Walker, V -F' C.M. V Lamar, --P' R.A, Remington, V =F' 10,897 3,029 13,508 12,162 e 84,718 60,692 68; 199 21,622 19,351 10,763 10,182 - 11,b74 10,631 CORp,ORATE. E1Ak;KGFAU11D Thla holding company Wee,tormed to 1083 to seal's upon divestiture from AT &T (effective Jen..1, 1984), all shares of: three telephone companies- Mountain Staten Telephone & Telegraphy Co., North - Woatern bell Telephone Co,, and Pacltio Northwest ell Tele "pphone, Intl. (all separately desorlbed); and a cellular advanced mobile communications tesrv;ae turn company, .US WEST New, Vector Group (80.6% offo .owned by Co.).' 1 .47 . ,r. '•::+ municat(one and a char go Oconekchange telecom• tae service Colo., Ida,, Iowa; Minn., Mont,, Neb., N,M,, N.D., Ore., S.03., Utah, Waah., and ,.,p ,r r. US WEST NowVector Group provides advanced moblle communlcationa services using cellular tech- nology, mainly In De.wer, Phoenix, St.,Paui, Salt Lake City, Minneapolis and Seattle. • Company alit has other' Wit' II y owned°aitbeidlnr- s including Landmark Publishing Co,, which pub - o.lies . tolephano direct rlee thru Its wholly, owned„ U 8 ST Direct ;Co.; U ,5 WEST Communication Services, no. wh7otr sails business eontmt nicatlons gulpment and provided communlcaticns consulting ed engineering litetallatlete�r, maintena�pco and ser- e of communlcatlon systems: SetaWeot Proper - es, Inc., which proVidas propetty management and eyeiopreent services to Co, end,Ito subeidinriesl d` U S WEST Flnnnclal Services,' Ina„ which pro- 28,658` 11,440 Pro. 11,763 de, 9,173 8,641 8,785 17,353 18,108 16,783 le e" 8,579 .6,182 cr000 11 34,470 32,346 31,080 q. !•..,, 8,883 8,237 8,074, '*td 25,837 24,106 23,006` e ` 471: she,: 1988 13,2 5,g 8, 81 vlc 1988- .13,308 8971 adJtd, for Del:: '88 4 ti '"'i 8i60d,divds. ` d an • r. 8430 DIRECTORS{' P„ Remedios Diaz - Oliver G.L. Ryland •• " - ", G.A. Dove J.D. Sparks t, -;' • Shirley M. Hufatedier W.I. Spencer ' ' • A.F. Jacobson , W.A. Strauss 'C'"' i &. r. J, A.'MacAlliater. ti,:; J.H. Vollbrecht,r8r.'r*T,3•er R,D. McCormick -.T.., , U.0, Williams' +' r •,;,i R.D,•O'Brien ' '•: Daniel Yankeloyich see OFFICE- 7800 E.'Orchard Rd„ Englewood, CO 80111 (Tel.: 303- 793. 6500). ANNUAL MEETING - In May. .+ ••r t 'r 5 see e . ^ . 1 "„:"..:?-1.1: ,f BOND DESCRIPTIONS •' 4*(" f+': U S WES1''CAPITAL FUNDING, INC.'8% CTD (NON - REDEEMABLE) NOTES' Due Oct 15, 1998 '' (S &P Rati'ag, AAL,; at July 31; 19801' tw Auth. & airbag. (Dec, 3i '87) $275,000,000 INDENTURE DATED June 1, 1988. _INTEREST PAYABLE Apr. & Oct. 15, to holders registered the preceding Mar. 31 & Sept, 30, respectively. PRINCI- PAL & INTEREST PAYABLE at Chase Manhattan Bank (N.A.), NYC. INTEREST GRACE PERIOD- 90 days. .' ,r. ,. , .r.,, r.; TRUSTEE- Banquest /Ftrat National Bank of Santa Fe, N.K. ar',� ..rr',: ' DENOMINATIONS- Fully registered, .51,300 and multiples thereof. GUARANTEED unconditionally as to principal and interest by U S WEST, Inc., parent., .' • , ;1, SECURITY- A dlrect unaecured obligation, Wlth certain exceptions, U S WEST Capital Funding may not mortgage or pledge any property or asaets without aecuring the, notes equally and ratably there- with: LISTED on the Luxembourg SE, PRICE RANGE - OTC bid: 1988...,.,•....:, 929s 88V4 1987 1986 100 99 101'/ 881/4 ,f• STOCK DATA PREFERRED STOCK PURCHASE PIGI'fTS- •Apr. 19, 1989, Com, , stockholders received one Pfd, Stock Perchoae Right, expiring Apr. 6, 1999, for each Com, share. Privilege to entitlement trades witty Co.'s Com. shares. At the time the Rights becorne exercisable, separate certificates will be distributed, and the Rights could begin to trade separately from Co,'a Com. shares., Rights become exercisable 10 days after a person or group acquires 20% or announcea a tender offer for 30% or more of Co.'s shares. Upon occurrence of ouch event, each Right would entitle the holder to buy ' /tooth of a eh, of Sur,.A Jr. Partic. Cum. Pfd, for $180. If Co, is involved in a merger or ether business combination at any time after the Rights become exercisable, the Rights will be modified no as to entitle the holder thereof to buy a number of the acquiring company's Com, shares having a market value of twice the exercise price of each Right, If a 20% holder acquires the Co, by means of "a reverse merger in which the Co, and its eharea survive, or engegoa in self - dealing traneao- Ilona with ,tho Co., each Right not ownedeby the acquiror would become exercisable for the'elwpber of Co.'o Com, shares which at that time h&'ve a market value of twice the exorcise price of the Right. Right's are redeemable by Co.,at $0,01 each at any time prior to a public announcement that -;20% of Co.' a Com. stack has been acquired, DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT PLAN is nubble to stockholders, • « -" STOCKHOLDERS -.Deo, 31, 1998, 1,007,428 of record)., , ' , . , • • JackaonVllle, lee • t,r „ , ech Inc:; TRANSFER AGENT- American Trunat LISPED- NYSE (Symbol USW) Nov. 21, 11983, on a When iasuod basin; rend Feb. 18, 1984 regular way; else Hilted Pacific, Beaten, Midwaot, Phila., London, Zurich; Beale, Amsterdam, Tokyo rind Gen- ova SEC r' ., „ 1988,,.,,.,,;., 59.4 483/+ 1987.....,,,.., 60'14 4292 `" 1088 ,, , ,.,,, 62 48'N 1985 89 68'h 1984,,., . 1.►t, 70'M r35" /e 1963 ...,,,...., 80 555'/ *Aft, 2 •for -1 split May 9; Def. 1033/a'83Va, r n, . sr DIVIDENDS Corn, no par, S); 1+;"4331 1989 (to Aug, 1) ...t.a.:.:,,..n:. 2,78 1989...,,., 3.48 1987,..,1....3,22 1988.:.....,..1,52 '86)" , , r,,e, (Bef. 2•tor -1 split May 9 ` 1986 :.,. 2,95 1985444441 4 8.8,4 1984:,,,. ... 64,05° °Inci, $1.35lniilalMa�r -1, t ,r 9 EARNINGS AND FINANCES tlyd r,,';;' We h DITORS- Arthur Andersen &� Co., Seattle, tCONSOL. EARNS.; Y -E Dec, 31; Mil. $ Opar. Depr, & Fxd,; , ITma. { Rev . Inc.' Amort, Ch841. <' Earn, 1986,,,.,,,, ;, 9,220.6 3,788.5 1,780,2 834,9 ' a '3,26 8,445,3, 3,037,5. - 1,841,2 587,0 "" 3,84 1988,.,.,.,,...' 8,308,4 3,448,1 ` 1,399,6- 689,8w 3.8'4 1985.,..,,,. ' 7,812,8 3,288.7 1,275,5 : 7,279,6 3,001,1 1,105.7 ' .-----Y! t -- ' 1983....,,,,,,,' 7,800,0 3,182,8 1,204.5 r ., ' 7,482.0 2,871,8' 1,041,0 ' I --".1 . ,'•r'. 1981.,.,,,,,,, 6,855.2 2,703,6 918,8 ,0,1.41 ',r1,} r Inc,' . , i :: 4.: . Net .1. 'Sh. • ' Taxes Inc. "}. Earns. 1988 ' 4982 1,1317• 6,17 1987 .....,,•668.0 1,005.5 5.31 &1986 ' ■ 1 651.8 a924.3 ,.' ' . a4.86 1985 879,9 1925.8 '' 9.88 - 1984 .. 1833,0 887,0 9.24 1983 038.8 894,4:,41 1•: - -- 1882 . • 67213 837,e 11:41' ,; .553.8 81749 e 1-'4 ' *As reported by Co. '7'.'41 ;,r.1.'. �4,,, . of #Represent, comb.• opera. of Mountain Sell, 'Northwestern Bell and Pacific Northwest Bell. .,. For 1988 & aft, on a pre- tax , calculation ;for prior years eliminated as not comparable. ,;, aincls, charge of $52,000,000 or $0.27 par eh. . related to restructuring coots. . . ` , ' ;l,DJTD, EARNS. for May '88 2 -for -1 stk. split $,,. 1986 1964 ; : • 'r Di 't -., r t,` w 111 L Annual Report- Conaol, inc. Acct. Yra; End, Dec. 31: Mil, '$ i. ,•fy 1988 b1987 • b1986 Sales & oth, ,,. , . , 9,220:0 .8,898:5' 8,380.9 ' ,• .'2,686 ,8 • 2,377,3 Coeta'ol eery, • products,,, .Sail., gen. & .i .Y'.G. adm. expo.... 2,748.3 2,393:9 2,471.9 Oper. income.... 3,788.5 3,783.7 3,531.7 Other income, net , •, ' r 43.9 17,8 85,3 Total income ,.. 3,832.4 3,801.3 3,817,0 Depr, atnort.. • 1,760,2 1,685,1 1,438.8 100,0 Prov. for re- - ". structuring..,, "' • Gain on partial sale of sub• . • Interest expeee Leas; Capital- ized Int income tax Net income Cash divda. Bair aft, divda, ft 1484 834.9 687.0 cr45.0 cr29,1 4943:84, '' 672,8 +1,1311'' '1,005.5 844,8*,,, 819,2 yr '488<9' 388,3 • *Ste earns 44141“ $8.17 $6,31 u, , Aft; .. 1V);.. y w4 :6 Fixed Charges Coverage :. , 1•..., Avail. for Fxd, . , Chga, N,.,,.,,. 2,072.2 2,138.2 2,178,4 :Gross Fxd, Chge.... 834.9 • 687,0 i • 652.8 c'F.C, Trite, Unitrode Corp. CAPITALIZATION (Jan. 31'89) LONG TERM DEBT- $2,3871559 $1,738,984 curr, portion. ` STOCK -. , Auth, She O,x Pfd. $1 par 1,000,000 s$ Common $0,20 par"30,000,000 t13 441 era, with 793,200 1 in &future grants; . restricted MtkG and cash bonus pan, end *" " tExcl. 75,240 In tress, REVOLVING CREDIT AGREEMENT o $10,000,000- none taken down II d. CORPORATE BACKGROUND Company 'and subsidiaries -Hake elecro, ponenta, Including semiconductors, pow men& ICa, passive components, dale devices, and switching power supplies, " ' Company operates plants In Mass, (g), Cat Ariz., H, ' e.,, Tex., Mexico (2), Sing.», SUBSIDIARIES- wholly owned- Po Corp.; ' Unlmex B.V.; Power General Ccro' General Ltd.; Auto Circuits, Inc,; and ouw eke owned subsidiaries with the name2.1-14411576( a pe titles, EMPLOYEES- Jan, 31, 1989, INCORPORATED In Md. Feb, 11, 1960 CHAIRMAN, G.M. Berman; PRES i1'I F 1n OFFICER, H.F. Wasserman; SR V -P, le 9 Oft TREAS, R.E. BrierloY; V-Pa, M.J, O'Coi, Weigold, R R, Feler, Edward Simon, N,E Done W.T. Campbell, Jr,; SECY. R.S, Morse. Jr,, Cr01flR. R.W. Woodbur.r. Jr, ' DIRECTORS W.6, Gates, Kenneth Nett, Se Beaman, A.L. Goldstein, Norman Landet:oe Gable, P.A. Brooke, H,P. Wasserman, 652,8 OFFICE- 6 Forbes Road, Lexington, has ft (Tel.; 817.881. 8540). ANNUAL MEETING - is cr44.8 . 848.1 ,. r x924.3 STOCK DATA 077.7 STOCKHOLDERS- Jan, 31, 1989, l,23/tsr 348.6 ord), Mar, 31, 1989, Signal Companies, Inc ante $4.88 controlled 2,585,700 Com, she, (18.74&.), DOOM Asset Management, Inc. 1,408,900 she 20 Trimarklnvestment Management, Inc, 1,001 7,2%6 , 'and Invlate Capital Mansges*e. i11 932,700 she, (6.8%). TRANSFER AGENT & REGISTRAR- D d#Q'' ion, Maas. ,932 o1e'r'1,250 �tr.1,878� d .1,876 d. „$0,14 . 'i, « - `, & coma' oqu 11188 -13,80 ,wn of `CO. rt ee reduct ".` t,Jana31: ''°` t'►$• ' 1 rCftr�' 8 , Bs. ,�1Si. 30 ,.0 161.1 "TAre. , 1 TM'' .11149; $ ' 75 .•--s ' >KtY 56 5,.m ')nt: .. t ' '''''''',\ ww $. 1 f • .G?, :,. 131: tt �r ;,• .'4311'5. ::& 7 'v�v'� • i ',,fThi644 Nr part" t; e`}• � ,1c' dr a: + a1 21, s'rJ *2,• 72 ' . t'A c.- 13t. ee}a:t '8:;' t,,4:13,0791, 8 ' . y.trir co tizTi (Fr -=T $10€ 547- ON ,00G' r :r 9'99; $30,c, • Dement ^et prime„ 1 Mltmor " ' &700 'bhp -' " ",term t ..' " Ing cry y As: 1„ Ott « r ' ' coned i grants o! ,I.:. i1 ?9B9. ". spilt �1Ci't g ;provldl 1 i!!!A( "IIa YIRd a',err' 'h land c . 4 y, ration e elnb, t gulp ►,z1"' ' . !(w c 'C� '., oillrtta , trlbttti 00"1' 1.28, Dirt. 1624) 1 odd n =ott ie "t r, *ha. i 118+ cr $$ " Eem.,......' ..K• ," 3.26,1 3,84„ • 3,94 • 1 ,'$lr 'ti $ttr., $ . °i'� td i ". �t .• eier • •AVge, she.; 1988-- 183,4'27,0db; 1987- 189,613,000; 1989 - 190,135,000. • .' '.$ fincls, net gain' of $88,700,000,, or $0.48 per ah., 'fr partloi Bale of subeld,,, ' . ,e• e t alncla, a net charge of $52,000,000, or $0,27 per related to restructuring costa: bRociaeaified to relleotadoption of FASB 94 "Conaolldatlon of All '.Majority Owned Sub , -+t ", 3, ' pear i Conrad. Hal Sheet D.C. 31: MO.'S') Aaaeto. " „' i • 1968 •r' ' 41087 PCaeh & equiva ... ,t "l G' •4152,2 °3': • o° 323.4 Short'term invetmte ''$ti' ti ' .152.0' w4: 169,5 • 1,771,4 1,619,9 Inventories v , 2143 20548 Oti, curr, aaeete ;. . h 4� 224.1^'`•'^' 203,9 r., Tot. curr..aaeetn :s: 'r :2,514.0 a 5 :'' 2,422.3 Inveotteenta' & etli. 14,•41 61■ aesota,,,.Y .. ..::y.......lrti '' "er 2,896,3.-1" 2,628.6 'rNet. property 1,.'„i....^ ' ''•' 17,00848 i:'Y 18,532,4 Total 22,416,9 A "'•. 20,981,2 a•1 Llabflitiea ,t''1 ,• ".,rrs r' • .. Short -term borrows 383,7 ','Curl`. debt mat, , ,, ;. ,r '4083,1 373.8,':' , 308.3 Accts, pay,,,, ,,,,,,;,,, ",,r" 1;024,`/' . ;: r ' 074,0 Aeoniala a r "1,089,8''': ,' 1,050.8 Incohrie taxi a....,.,t,: ;ra ',103ua'' 139,7'" 4$ir:' ;' 135,7 Dlvda, pay 1r ifrl' .." 100,7; ; 1E- 152,2 Tot, curr, Ilabe..:. 1'VW &'3,330,1evu r'' ' 2,98.4,7 'Long term 'dob1.,.,,t. ,o •ill 4 • `,"13,879.0 i'RT 1' 8,345.6 Unemort, disc 1,N,,,,, '4'1n dr21319�rtli- , dr228,ii1 Deer, inc., takes,& .i1' oet1R :9t.► "r,tr•C , ;'ln,,,, rr credite ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,11t+«tC 4, 371rM,ron• 4,621,;2 )Com, atk:Yn.p„ lien& 'ebrif , 4, 5,0' 'nr" a -' 4,171.2 Retain, earns ,,.,.,..'t ,&J' : `3,770.43 04'1•. 3,286,1 b. ' 'Total liabo ,,,.,',ittt r.�;h "s22,415,9 "444.$ t9#99142 'Net Wkg. cap..,.,,, :112 ' :r',r od818t7 r. T -'' d402.4 r '. EgUityr per gee „eeet; `&tie 4'1't' $41146 -.. r:, $38,98 ar' dDoticltr ;ill lx ,,rr.urtl :Ircf8'inrrota:vr•1,1• big! lrt "rr .1 unit -tat: *Dept, rea,14 ,, L:". ta.iftrI'.,7133917tej8nfi,, 5',91111 t':lt gtia.t 19e i-182;1342;34i; 1987 -- +185,679,000 t'eacliiding treaa.'•tehs, r'dt'- 4'10,588,706 ,1n 1988 -t& T ,860,046 Inwll3s7:a"' 641? � . uout'�rt +4 lit.: mi1'o:,r.c1.tb' oReotated, �t'3 it pte1t1J»11",M� 7W r.." U !'.rtn 41 fit r4 �ta LISTED- NYSE (Symbol UM); also hstai lie ton, Midwest and Phila, SEs; 1988.......,.... 27'h 10V2 1985, " 11 1984::,.:.:..::: 36Th 22 t 1983 ,.,..,Y„ 1982 „ 43'h 21 es *1081 F.s w 1980....:.,,..., 48 23'/1 1979,....•..,, srm *'Aft, 2- for -1 split June 19; bof., 58"•32*, &Aft: 2- for -1 split July 1; bef., 85.40 ",' RECENT DIVIDENDS (Cal. Yre,)- Com.$1A0f 1988..:,.,..:,,, Nil 1987.84,:,. 0,20 1983 .-w (Bef. 2 -for -1 opiit July 1, 198$ 1983 0,18311 1982.:,.:, 0,25 t98.1 -y' (fat, 2 -for -1 split June 19, 1981) . 1981.,,,C1.37'h 1980,.,....,, 0.50 1918... -- EARNINGS AND FINANCES AUDITORS- Coopers & Lybrand. Bps ' CONSOL, "EARNS., Y -E Jan. 311 Thou. $ Nei Inc, Salon Taxes 889 ,,., 103,297 1,250 i,07 988. „, 135,104 cr10,750 ddr, 987 149,422 cr2,870 `"- tail 988.... 187,988 54185' 22,2&1 1985 ,,.. 200,113 11,010 22•f:e 1984 109,671 9,789 983 .4,, 120,062 7,263 1�1»` 902.:., 112,408 7,647 ,„ 10 981 ..., 103,601 7,330 980.... 81,609 Y 0.630. re •Bef, extraord, items ;(Thou, 0); 101a0 $0,88; 1981, cr87 or $0,03, Sh, earns, are ae re sorted bYCo' ll1 ADJTD, EARNS. for July '86, JUiy 33 Spinet '$ ie 1986 1984 1983 1982 p916 0 "' 0,83 0.03' 0,65 0.49 Annual Report' Conaoi. Inc. Accl„ Y� 3 U Thou. $ r r Ft� 1988 104 183,297 9891. Goat & Sipe ,1:. r 140,252 Oil�er, Incoane,1 "." 17,0'36 d4'241 -M Othier lncofnsi'..''31. r . 397 : me' , otal.lncoi io,... 17,462' d4,110' Depr, & amort.. 13,404 eject), IJnueutil Items„,, 1 I4,4at@ 3 ?slag lath asks tr.,1t:' J,1tB at Co, S ,WELDING FARRICATING.& MFG ` .3010iirr'COMPANY . 1725 Clarkstone.Rdi, Cleveland,' Ohio 44112A riJ T&. 216.461 -3900 • ,ctrm & Pres-H. A. Zaruba &Treas-S. Acct& s. - Swcress & Associates, Independence. primary Bank -- Central National Bank ! ;,.,, r • yaks Range :,S1 -2Mil Employees: 20 r , 0 *Also DIRECTORS ,. ., pgoDUCTS: Metal work , • „a, y J C. 3443 , t� S WEST FINAN?1061.9' IAL SERVICES, (Subs. U S 11V ®st, Inc.) e + 6200 5. Quebec, Englewood, Colo. 80111 Tel. 303-773-2363 , ,chrm, Pres & Chief Exec Officer- Thomas R. Purcell sr,V.P- 'James W. Connor Sr V ^P- William 1'. Dashiell: Sr V•P -Jerry M, Waddle y.p (Admin)- Betsey Blakeslee. V.p-- Michael W, Bulien V.p, Secy & Gen Coun -Harry S. Gill; y.p--- Robert A. Pinkerton V.p & Chief' Fin Officer - Steven J. Rohrbach V.P.-Eileen M. Smith Trees--Sally S. Connelly accts- Arthur Andersen & Co., Denver; Colo. Sales: S61 9M5i1 Chase Employeesp Manhattan N.A. *Also DIRECTORS -Other Directors Are: James T. Anderson . . ,David I, Brenner . David L. Sletta •tames A, Smith .{„ BUSINESS: Diversified fin. sere. SIC, 8721 U S WEST, INC. 7800 E. Orchard Rd., Englewood, Colo. 80111 Tel. 303-793-6500 'Chan & Chief Exec Officer -Jack A. MacAllister 'Pres & Chief Oper Officer- Richard E. McCormick Exec V -P &, Chief Fin Officer- Howard P. Doerr Exec V -P &:Chief Plan Officer - Charles M. Lillis Exec V•P-- Richard .1. Callahan . V•P & Treas-- -James T. Anderson V•P & Cont -David Brenner V•P (Human Resources) -James H. Stever Secy & Gen Coun- Laurence W. DeMuth, Jr, Sales: $9,22Bi1 Employees: 69,223 Stock Exchange(s): NYS, BST, PAC, MID, PSE *Also DIRECTORS -Other Directors Are: Remedios Diaz•OliVer Shirley M. Hufstedler Alien F. Jacobson Robert D. O'Brien Glen L. Ryland William I. Spacer Willis A. Strauss • lack H, Voilbrccht, Sr, Daniel Yankciovich • . Robert Zander BUSINESS: Holding co.; telecommun, related products & SIC, 6719; 4813 U.S. WEST NEWVECTOR GROUP 'INC. 3350 161st AVo. S.E., Bellevue, Wash. 98008 Tel. 206 - 747 -4900 tormivsr NEWVECTOR GROUP' °Chem- •Richard J. Callahan 'Pres & Chief Exec Officer - -John E, Defeo V.l' & Treat-John M. Stachowiak V•P & Secy--- JoScph C. 0' Neil Suitt: 5133.03M11 Employees: 720 Stock Exchange(s): OTC . *Also DIRECTORS 51 I ES Cellular telephone sere, U S YACHT PAINT CO ,r INC. 278 rronklin Rd.; Unit 7, Randolph TWO., N. J. 07869 Tel. 201 =226 -0145 Pres.-John A. Pettit g ' Plt M r-- Alforise Primamore uP Valeiae Pettit Primary Bank- Trust CO. of New Jersey Sales Range: S1 -2Mil Enrpioyeest 16 PRODUCTS: Marine paints .•'” ' :' °r , 84,C. 2851.:... 1,N:+ K} UNITED STATIONERS INC ...1 ° 2200 E. Golf 61if., Des Piaines, 111.60016;• Tqi, 708- 699 -.5000 'Clirm, Pres; Chief Exec & Oper Officer-Joel D, Spungin Sr V.I. (Logistles)- RonaId Weissman !' Sr V -P (Oper & Sales) - Arnold Johnsen ( -- Bert W. Weinhofer r Sr VIP Admin)•& Chief Fin Officer- Marshall Gardner Sr 'V•P (5trat Plan) Ilo V.p (Human Resonrces)•Robert H. Cornell tV.p d) e o lecri 1 cn B Gravls (Av-id Hkt� V•i' (MIS) - Patrick Murray & Cont-Ted S. flzctuto Secy & Cor Cotta -0tis I.1, 1•1atleen Accts - Arthur Andcrten & Co,. Chicago, Ill. -; : -rCO R'PO RNTIONSka AT ,i... Primary Bank --- Nprthem ,Trust,Gom eny ;i:'C. Jt ,4:. tvl Sales: 5855.96M11 •- YrEmpioyeoa: 3,0001:,v1r,ra i r ,,'iu,:s Stock Er- .hange(s): NAS,t ;1'0OP. lGP!•E :rvdF . "r,.,13 ±R,tso DIRECTORS •l7rWen Directorapytrevilj David Coolidge, 11! .k,t' !)t'p7ack, ''Crockei a , y;i, Ira A: Eichncr " ��` Melvin T.)1eckktman�',1 Nathan "Kessler Orr „,,, `, 11iih s TWyniarr ` PRODUCTS: Wholesale offrcrpr&iucts & supplies SIC. 5112 f • UNITED STEEL. PRODUCTS 'COMPANY 10 Pork Ave., Enat Orange, PI `J. ',07017 Tel. 201 - 673-1330 *Pres- Martin A. Skulnik ' ,' " " ' ' "�e' • y r *V -P (Oper)- Howard C. Skulnik ;Faw51 • {r. *Secy -Mary Kaminski 1,1 Accts- Armus, Brooks, I arnson "&rib:; Mountainside,, N. J. , .,t: , ,,� „r„ Primary Bank- Midlantic National'Bank ' 'r Primary Law Firm- Slavitt, Hochberg, Slavitt & Sithon Sales Range: S l0- -20Mi1 ' Employees: 150' • ' Also DIRECTORS r, " PRODUCTS; Steel' pallet tacks "..•,rx1 - "r S.I.C. 2542 UNITED STEEL. PRODUCTS CORP. 2075 E. State St., .Trenton, N. J. 08605 Tel 609- 586-0100 Pres- -John E. Gray :r V•P- Michael Messarge • . Plt Mgr ---E. Slebodnick Primury Bank- National Westminster, , Sales Range: 52- 5Mi1" Employees:'32 +ty "rl•' PRODUCTS: Concrete reinforcing, steel bars, S.LC. 3449 • - ,. UNITED STEEL & WIRE COMPANY " 4909 Wayne ltd., Battle Creek,, Mick. 49016 ✓i" Ter. 616 - 9624571 Pres & Treas- Donald Carstens t . • V -P (Sales) -Frank G. Craig, 4: ,. „ 114, V -P (MIS)- William R. DePouw ,..,,,' , ,,, ; • • Secy -Robert P. Hamilton 1«„ ;40ti , . r, Purch Agt -Mike Colasanti " .. Accts- Price Waterhouse, Battle Creek, Mich. Sales Range: 525 -30Mi1 Employees: 200 PRODUCTS: Wire, products forms, shelving, shopping carts, racks cases,• carriers ,., S.LC.�3496 •, , .a,',l3t'1' UNITED SUPPLIES, INC. Airport Rd., Eldora, lawn 50627 Tel. 515. 858.2341 Pres --- Richard C. Murphy. V•P (Fin) & Treas -•- •Maurice L Hyde ; Secy -Roger Kruli Accts- Deloitte & Touche, Des Moines, Iowa Primary Bank- Harris Trust & Savings Bank Sales: $97Mr1 Employees: 135 ' ' •+ : , Directors Are: a1 Don Allen '• "' • .- '•Art Brers f.'•b Casper on .R.Iteith Eastman Ernie Kruse f • •,n'Bob Lutes. Larry Mayer ,.Earl P,erinjaquet• Laurence Wolf r' • PRODUCTS: Liquid & dry agric, chemicals, fertilizers, animal feed; prod. of swine semen, ., . S.I.C. 5191. ' 5154. 5159 UNITED SURGICAL STEEL. COMPANY, INC.. P. O. Box 2784E Montgomery, Ala. 36196 r Tel. 205- 261.3440 "Pres -John O, Hope • '1.1,' - *Exec V-1'---Irene Hope *V•P, Treat & Gen Mgr-,-Tom Hope Secy & Asst Mgr- Claudette Reddock • Dian Prod Mgr --Max Byrd Accts- IIUnkcnship, Livings, Ltimar & Co., Montgomery, Ala, Primary Bank- AmSoutth Bank, N,A. Sales: 56M11 Employees: 68 . *Also DIRECTORS •- -Other Directors Are: J, Wade Hope + Jitnfny R, Hope PRODUCTS: Cookware, china, tlatWare, crystal.. 5719 1,: t .,, t UNITED SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, INC. ' 301' rGatev:►ay lie, Irving, Texor 75063 ' . t C1rrm, Pees &,Treas- -David Johnson { 1 " V•P -Vet Pitts V -P (Fin), Secy'& Treas- Randy,McG "ee! y P -Jerry Byrd' Accts Coopers & Lybrand, Dallas,, aXess Primary bank- United Bank of Boulder r . Primary Laa Firm- Koransky Friedman &&Cohen, P.C.. Sales: Over S2Mil ' ' , 1, u r Stock Exchange(s )t OTC *Also DI GTOIRS- -- OQlier,Direetors Are: Myles Braverman {,•A :'J4, Wt1lltun, Eggert Tom Gephart w , Jordan lssackccles David Johnson ; • l; ... 'John Pappajohn• " Douglas Pekin' 1.. PRODUCTS: Software systems for fin. Mgt. S I Ca'13'72 ' • 277.1 I n,Ro.1 51140P,': Employees:!.¢; 13) 440 d etMIlso,i DIRECTORS PRODUCTS Leather convertersj,. 37" ' r INITED, TAPE ..S LABEL; ' . +� 'bfer ,. (Div. lM ®ec ®•Industries) ;, K ,.> ,� , e ,,,,,457 Circle Frwy. Dr., Cincinnotl, Ohio 45246 ;.',t Tel. 513- 874 -1630 ..?- -J o ,) t, *aril & Zinser` * V•P --R. Craig Curran ,,*':t , on-4,5 + *Secy di Tress --Jeff Baker V ' '. + �„nlr' ).`) rr11w /1% ''l`''Y *Cont-Robert C Austin *Mktg Mr-James Haun "t ,1 'r" '4r.,!S: Accts- Ernst & Young, Grand Rapids, Mich,l• "' "'x " ti Primary Bank- Star Bank, N.A. ; Cincinnati,. '? r. Primary Law Firm-Cors Bassett Kohlepp,Halloran'& Moran ' s..,x • ••, + . +1� t c ',1t• Sales Range: 55- 10Mi1' Employees: "5l� "t,n 1 "y - n,.: r, 1A1s.. DIRECTORS SI.C+j3111 av5•.cr,�. t PRODUCTS* Printed pressure sensitive labels & tapes - c. : S.I.C. 2672' ,. •.s ,, �1 +,,,., , Tal. 214 - 518 -0728 r r UNITED TANNERS, INC. (Dii►. Suncook Tanning Corp.) 40 Endicott St. P abpdy, Mali*. 01960 s08- 532.0707 *Pros- Melvin R. Ossoff, *V•P (Mfg) -Hyman CittotQ- *Tress --- Michael M. Ossolf Accts -- Pannell Kerr Forster, Boston, Mass. Primary Barth --- Century Bank & Tr'JSI Coriipany UNITED ,TECHNOLOGIES CHEMICAL. ", 'SYSTEMS ; o W ° (Div. United Technologies Corporation), P.O. Box 49028, San Joao, Cal. 95161 T.I. 408 - 281.1122 Exec V -P & Gen Mgr-D, E. Lcc Sr V -P & Dep Gen Mgr -D. R. Nuzzo V•P &,•Coun --J, L. Bohan V V-.P P (Bus Devel) -H, L, Crosby 4-• " !'`5 "?t f . (Fin• &,Admtn) - .`C Ritter "•' V -P (Open) --`D. A. North V- P,.(Prog) -A. Baldi .. _.. V "P (Research) -B. R. Felix ::1 S . y,,., + V•P (Metes-1214 Punch) -L. Wiles , , Cont."--:11,H. 'Groh . ,t ., Per DIr= -M. P. Gil , r ,," Data Proe •Igr -K. Halvorson Chief Engr -•C' A. Chase 9`:atffc Mlgr --I. E Overmire , Pub Zeit Dir -J. 11. l'toscli :,,,, •', n a t Employe es: 2,600 PRODUCTS. Research, level & prod, of rockets, propellers & proprIsion sys. S.I.C. 3161; 3728; 3764; 8731 UNITIip TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION United Technologies Bldg., Hartford, Corn. 06101 Tel. 203 -728 -7000 r UNITE D TECHNOLOGIES i *Chrm, Pres & Chief Exec Officer = •Rpbcrt F.'Dauicll` -'. Exec V-P (Pres, Coml /End)- Georgc'A. L. David i* Exec,V ;P & Spec Advisor to arm-Edward W Large Exec V -P & Chief Fin Officer- john'A..R011s , Exec V=P (Pres, Aerospace /Defense) -Arthur E ' Wegner , • • Sr V -P (Human Resources & Orgn)- Franklyn A. Caine Sr V -P (Ind Group &Pres, LT Autatnottve)- =E4ward , M• Irving 1 , �,• Sr V -1' (Strategic Plan)- Aibcrt `J. Kelley r: , 8r V -P (Public Affairs)- Sidney F?. McKenna r F. Sr V -P (Exec V•P, Aerospace /Defens e)- Wiliiatn Paul , • d Sr V -P & Gen Coun -- Irving B. Yoskowitz t,,. V•P & Cont -Mark 5, Coran tr,•; tr .f V -P & Treas,- Frederick C. Flynn, Jr. ,r ,, V -P (Inf Sys) -John M. Hammitt, r. ,t 111 V -P (Science & Tech) - Robert J. Hermann V- P- Je0'tey 1- Kushner 's V -P. (Govt Contracts & Compliance) - •Frank McAbec, Jr. • • r,' J V•P Common)- Frnnklrn J• Parisirtr, +r V,P (Coe Parch) - George J. Sanford,' Jr &,Dep Gen Ctlun- William H. Trachsei Pres & Chief Exec Officer (Carrier)- •.••Williarrt A. Wilson Cor Onnbudsmarr- Robcrt'J•' Morrissey - ,« Secy & Assoc Gen CounLawrence R, "Pitrtcll` a.. Accts- Price Waterhouse„Nery .Yoriry 1.•i Primary Bank- Citibank, N.A. ,,.1.1";;;„ Reve:iuet $18,501311 Employees: 1871000 w~•... Stock Exchange(s): NYS , , , µ +,Y'; ". *Also DIRECTORS - Other, Directors "A Antonia Handler Chaycs Robert F, 'Dec Charles W. Duncan.' Jr, T. Mitchell Fiird . Pchr G. Gyllcnhamrnar Robert H. Malott John 5. Reed Richard S mith , Jacqueline CJ. Wetri r .. ' . ,r " r" PRODUCTS: Provides a broad range ofs products, systeMs & gcrviccs, prirnarily to the aerospace & defense,,buiiding & automotive industries, aircraft englrieS, 'helicopters, nerospacc equipment, defense systems, air conditioning, systems, elevators & escalators, alitomotiVe components &i systems 1: S.I.C. 3721; 3511; 3519; 3534; 3563; 3585; 6'94;,1699; 3714; 6724; 3728; 3764; 3822; 7389 90 04/30 14:34 X503- 293-9409 TRAMMELL PDX DIRECTW March 27, 1990 Paul V Brockbank Project Director rael., Crow Company 10260 Sod6 Greenburg Rd Portland, OR 97223 Rey: Proposal to Lease '- Five Lir oih Center Deer Mr. Brockbank; The Purpose of this . general �a� and conditions to �tr�z�rirm in wra�ta.a�g the ►� ions xui on ) Which % S WEST birect I .reatli would be interested in entering into a lease Vith office cl ter Phase '�1" Limited Partnership ("Landlord") for i ri�+�lxa Cez� �� » p n Center in PQttlar�d, Oregon (the $ Z2 �l�re band � n erty�+) , This letter is hot, and shall not be Construed . ass, a .ease; but rather it expressses our desire and intent eater into a lease With the Landlord subject to er t th r�eqc�t�.a.t ins betwe+�n the parties, good it% ha g`e yeral terms 'and conditions, are . re as TcXIQWs U 8 WEST Direct Center Phase V Limited Partnership BROKER: BetaWest Properties ..: All oommissiond and other fees due to BetaWest, HackMant and a �Y Other l�rc�,ers�' LEASED a paid by Landlord pREMISES * a , Re itabl a t'sab . e Sc, 7ti F1Qnr 180559 17,099 6th Floor 18,659 18,669 17,199 4th rl oor 18,$79 17,189 1st Floor 78,279 71,925 (0006 • ' 90 04,30 14:'35 2`50 ,.3 -9409 TRAMMELL PDX TENANT Direct may lease all or a Portion of the 4th floor subject to further sera :a planning; consectuently the Rentable Square Peet AY change. in addition,, Landlord would provide at least 30 days prior written mice of, and a first right of offer to, Direct for additional speLce on the First and second floors, as and When such space becomes available, from the date hereof through HArCh 31, 19921 to accommodate Tenant' e expansion needs, if any. The Rentable Square Peet on the 7th floor of the Leased premises is solo j act to reduction for the "conference Room" as described be1ora Landlord would ►rovide Direct with a noh Cash tenant improvement allowance for the Leased Premises which is at least equal to the coat of the standard improvements oe r tenants on the ?ropertY Provided to � �� 3r.o1uding but not limited to: - 32 ounce cut pile carpet. .. Parabolic lights. 2' M 2° Artstrong acoustical tile - Smooth finish 5/8" dry wall partitions. - WW base mec , ni al oyster* with in t n erior aldi exterior tones per Tenant' space Standard electric il der Tenant's specifications. - Upper and lower cabinetry in Tenant's kitchen, lunch room and Storage area. plumbing in kitchen per Tenant's specificatiOnsi but Which shall, not exceed $15. Qo/rat from floor to drop ce lirg (iri lading ceiling tile and light f�i ±tares) already in place. Material and labor charges shall be based upon* actual costs Paid by Landlord to the Cc!1tr act or (s) and Landlord shall not be entitled to anY a dditionai management or fe es. If the cost ot the tenant improvements for Direct ecceed Dir " ct ee t-.,tay allowance Oire,ot shall pays ally overage In addition Landlord's bUi1ding architect(s) and space planner(s) shall be made available to Direct, at no charge, fob" the purpose of working With Direct to design, prepare and finaliz e plans 141007 f. +• r 90 04/30 14:35 931 50 3-9409 TRAMMELL PDX and plans and sPecificatiOns for tenant improvements in the Leased Premises, including but not limit:ea to a computer room. Direct shall have up to three opportunities to review and revise said designs, plans and specifications at no charge/ and thereeadttmr any further r revisions shall be made at Direct's expense. In addition to the foregoing, Landlord shall Provide Direct with a special design alilnwance for rec ' t s computer rowan of $1.00/ref of computer room space. uttR ROOM: Zn addition to the special design al�.o wance, Landlord shall provide birect with a such ''sash tenant improvement allowance of for Directs computer rQQ1n up to a MaXimUm of 2,000/rsf. T ' the cost of the tenant improvements approved by Direct in the computer room or in the otthsr areas of the Leased Premises is lass than the maximuml allowance for such areas, Lairldlord agrees to credit suOili savin ' s to such uch ather areas of the Leased Premises or items as Tenant shall request. OOXPEREXCE ROOM: tand1ord shall, provide a building roo on the 7th floor which Shall be available to tenants at no charge. The plans and epecificat one for h conference room shall be subi ect to ��proa of Direct, which shall not ha ' unreasonably withheld.- LEASE TBRmi prat date Of ”Beneficial Occupancy" (d f'2$2ad below) through March 31, 1996 ENT SCHEDULE: 8egia niz g on the "tent .tOmluencement Date" (defined below) and throughout the entire Lease Term, Direct would Pali tandlord 013.75 tr ace let /rsf /yr as 'Base Rent." TENANTS PROP SMUM OF OPERWINd Based upon 7814/9 rsf in tha teased P'renises (out of 125,560 rsf total ) Direct' s proportiohat,o4 share Qt the operating' en Landlord represents that the average ca a r ih4 rises o r the prap+e: t ,�aaa��ai �n a are d . Od,,+ edd.i to to it e 14'008 4p7 90 04/30 14 36 '50 BENE7C�' .. C IAL OCCt ?ANCY: .93.9409 PENT CONCNT DATE: OPTION TOi NEW: TRAMMELL PDX Rent,' Direct would pay _ .tc pa:oportl.onate share of annual operating a CpenSes t which shall not exceed the fol l oving ceilings: Term gURKAntAgd_CA12ing $4 . 5 Q/rsf /yr k $5.0O /rat' /yre $5. SO /raf /yt•. $6 Oa /zsf /yr, $6.5O /rsf /yr 4/1/91 3/3`1/92 4/1/92 3/31/93 4/1/93 3/31/94 4/1/94 3/31/9 4/1/95 3/31/96 excluding any tax tate increases and any utility rAtft increases which arcs beyond' the control of Lands. Direct shall plot be obligated to pay any operating expenses whatsoever until the Refit commencement Date. November 1, 1990, or such later date as Direct may designate, but in no event later than March 1, 1991. Tf the tenant imps ,vtauents for the Leased Premises are not complete (subject only to punch list items) by > `s nuary 1, 1001, Penalties ,ma be iImpoaed (Direct can move in earlier if it so dasl.rox but Direct ► a earliest move-in date would be 60 days after the exeoUticn of the Lease and approval ftif oonetructioh documt ntsek taa d1ord will guarantee a 75 day construction period sub j asst to Force to j eura) April 1', 1991 Xend1Qrd agrees to provide Direct with two 5dyear options to renew all ar Plitt Of t ir,1ease� .upon six wr ant e p iez~ itten e.ce , The net rental,. rater deicing the op �. �' rst S " .. � � ..1 to the 1eoeor of the ear t�o� mall be e ua then ,. prcwa.il ixag isietrket rental, rate for coiipar�able space or $16,71 trip1 e net /a„ s '/yr. The net rental r .te during the oeocrnd 5 'myear option 04a41 be equal to the lesser of the then pprevailin market, rQt t41 rate for co parabld ap .60 cr $20.35 triple Xaet 'rsf/yr. Landlord agrees to Provide Direct with d parking stalls on. the Pro: eiir-t 'ur�rea��ve ..� .'., a� no char at a ratio a�e 441 stalls i'ar eves 1,000 ref in the Leased Premises t(IJ009 '. '90 04/30 14:36 'Z 606 J3 -9409 TRAMMELL PDX ',,.:: STORAGE FACILITY Landlord agrees to provide, at Direct 's option, a $7,000.00 allowance to build a cinder block sto ;age room in the Five Lincoln center parking structure. The rental rate for this space will be $0.30 Per ec; i are foot per month. Landlord agrees to provide Direct with access to building and parking facilities 24 -hours per day* 7 -days per week, 52- weeks per year. Landlord represents that Lincoln Center is fully equipped with a state-of-the-art liQnsywe1l Safety /Security System and a state-of '"the-art elevator and entrance card key coding' security system that will pr'rvide Direct with satisfactory security far the Teased Premises, and in particular Direct DA.rect/s computer room Each Direct ACCESS employee shall be provided with k Hori y ►ell card which Provides access to all of the Lincoln Center exterior door 24-hours peg day , 7-days Per week, 52- weeks per year. Landlord shall provide Direct with 4 cards/1,000 rsf at no charge; and any additional cards may be purchased by Direct for $10.00 cad.. In additions Direct employees cards shall be coded in such a way as to allow accgss to the Leeaed Pre»aiaes after normal business hours; and cagily certain Direct enp1oyees shall have cards coded to allow access to Direct' s computer room. Five Lincoln Center's security system Shall be equal to that custo aaril:y*'founci in class A do mto high- -risen where the building inanageme it can � e fic access hdura for spacifQ � e of the building. in essence, on the floors where Direst is the + Q L c tenant stairwell doors and ` the elevators shawl t3erve as secured entrances to bireeir + s space The standard operating hours for rive' Lincoln Center shall be Monday - Friday y6:X�m 30 a• . to 7:00 p.m, and Saturday 8 :00 a. n t ' � it 00 w\ 1�� p th additibn, tandlord shalt upon bire't + s ke est PrOVide utilities A0 and other building aerviddd to all or a designated part of tIle teased Premises during' non "'Standard � reasonable r�raaire. '�p�►�i, i��urs for a re Din edt a regi. stn, Landlord shall also install supplemental air conditioning units to >accoixnodate the cooling needs of 4010 90 04/30 14 :37 a/2503- 293 -9409 S PRXNELERg TRAMMELL PDX k1011 the computer and other equipment roo is, in addition to supplementing open office loads, in accordance with Direct e s specifications and pursuant to the tenant inPrQveraent agreement. Such supplevental srri.ces would be separately metered and cared tO Direct. Landlord represents that the building hat an operating sprinkler .er! system per fire code, SATELLITE 1,+ d1ord agrees to provide Diract with an ANTENNAS : Option, at Direct' s 0010 Cost and expenses, e�aa install ane operate zending and receiving satellite antonnaa and cables required oil the roof above FiveTixccl:n Center, Such space .requil,mtd by the satellites 1411 be at no additional charge to Direct. A)l assts associated with such, satellite sexy cee shall be at Direct's sole cost and expense. blAtcTOR C LISTI s Landlord shall prOVide Direct 'wish listings in all of the blinding directories at no wharge, Provided bisect a p s all ll Qcata and expenses in relation thereto, Direct sha 1, be allowed to placo s *onument s with its ame and Zo90 (in Direct e # Qixatom n ary style) Outside Of. rive. I► .:n4:Oin Center at _ a tutuallY agreeable .ovation, OTHER FEATURES AND AMENITIES (5 THE PROPERTY; ItESTRICTIVE COVENANT: LEASE FORM: h � Y Shalt -be as provided in tand.lcrd e a xravised proposal letter° dated March 14 , 1006, Landl and watt .d agree (ixt the fear* o2 . a covenant ih the t0460) that di the Lease 'er* Atid and., renewal (a) and extension (s) thcraa , it WQuxd lot leasle to a party or permit a* space in Fire Lib■o1h Canter to be used by any patty W is d reotlYe or ndiractxy thro4qh or attiliates ii..othor4100, eh ag+ e in the sale? da p Batt on o plidation Or use by they tgenera►�atii di root pad' , p teleephoi�a. arias or d . re .. . cf o�:10 +�s di,ra�t�xies �` to distribution to tourist t o nets ter :dahts', off' cot muhit be Iedtited i,h r coda by parties hordto ®i.ng • tidlord r 6 Offi06 Lease as a tOrtAtii. 0 ' 90 04/30 1.4:3''50 93 -9409 FIRM OFFER OF SPACE AND EXCLUSIVITY OF NEGOTIATION: TRAMMELL PD 1,6012 Upson the a cecutlon hereof the parties hereto agree that: (i) the ez eral terms and conditions stated herein shall remain in effect throughout ir negotiations and until at least April 27, 1990 (the ,INiagotiation Period") , (ii) they will negotiate, in god faith, ex cl usivel ' with � each �ather for rpose of entering into, a Lease for the Leaked Premises; (iii) Landlord will not pex it the Leasead P°ei.ses to be Leased by any third party during the Negotiation Period; and (iv1 Upon any inquiry from any other prospective tenant, Landlord d t11 advise such party that the Leased Premises is currently under option If the parties have not entered into an agreement by the end of the Mefaotiatioa Period, as may be extended ed by mutual agreezaant, then each party shall he released from any and, all obligations hereunder and Landlord shall he freer to offer the Leased premises in the marketplace It you are agreeable to the foregoing, please indicate your agreement by ' g p is letter and returning by s� nin ba�til �� ies e�f th one to me at Your earliest Convenience. Sincerely, U S WEST Direct Michael a. - essman Director Finaroe Operations/Real Estate Agreed; Lincoln Centet phase V Limited Partnership y . Ct6trF BP.r31i'® rton. the. Genetal Partner Title:. bate: •a 90 04/30 14:38 1250 -z93- -9409 TRAMMELL PDX ° A U Q War UI* *.4ing 146.44010 00 Group, 1fyt 10178 Ofort Hantei m Amnon, Suite WO 0etw t i blaradb 8641 303 $96.29t"13 lA t hullo Sn3 755.6666 Ibnye Kinn Sinter counsel April 11, 1990 gx.a. '1ac ter atz it s Mr, Paul vd, T3 ockban Project Director Trammell crow Compare' 102+0 S.W. Oreon):,urg Rd. Portland, OA _ 97223 Don Eknah r Esq, Bu , t ivant, Houser, bailey, 1211 SW 5th AV hue, Suite 1600 'hr nd, OR 0720 1.11614143r MARKETING RESOURCES' Gentlemen: p.. This shall oo;�fi�� our irrl� txaa�P cOrtva�rbatiaxt t•o4l�y wh rein ! advis e4 you th t due I to the regent Concerns 4 by the Cit a± Portland's civic and poiitiea1 coin unity about tJ $ WEST D .feet ' s potenti suburbs b V a WEST Diregt hob Into move �u� �� r�►►�t�►aric� and determined that t cannot fe s .b Ly Continue to hegotLate with Lincoln Cohter . Phase V Limited P_ .gtrer hip fo th6 PurPose of entering into a Data at rive t nc o1h Center, Therefore a:s We t i6Oussed, negotiations Under th* etter a' ' int6rt dated March 27, 1990 are hereby` tOrtttinatdd d "11 0 caw very tru1Y yours, ThfYa 'K"ins t6013 WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON April 30, 1990 James Logan President, US West Direct Dear Mr. Logan: I extend to you apologies from the Portland Metropolitan Region. It would appear as though the competition of the Market place for the prestige and honor of becoming "home" to your 300-employee operation has become g politicized. 1 challenge and request that you adhere to the principles that have made you P ? commodity, business decisions based upon analysis and merit and leave the p olitics toe and my peers. To ex pride prde in your association with the City of Portland is laud. able on behalf of Mayor Bud Clark, Fred Stickel, Bob Ames, and members of the Association for Portland Progress.. To involve themselves politically and civically to retain your presence an Oregon or the Portland Metropoli -- tan Area is equally commendable. Tr, exert proported influence to thwart a legally -- binding business decision that is i.n the best interest of Your corporate image..and that maintains your presence in thelPortlanddMetro ol,itanaRe ion.. is . P g unconscionable. Perhaps Mayor Clark was not apprised of the legal status of your ne'otiations.. Perhaps Portland Development Commission was energized g p the Portlan at the last minute and forgot about their contractual relationship with Washington County. The art $o your business reasons for this zealous attempt to become a . pa y y ess transaction may be admirable, but they are certain - ly incongruous with the adopted political philosophy shared by all of us in the 'portland Metropolitan Area what is good f,'ir any c.ie of us is good " tix' the region. .and good for Oregon. Texas, P energies competition Washington, We e�c end our ener zes on corn etitzon with North Cary as and California...not with each pP Pride the success of the region, noting the interdependencee and cooperative efforts that have been the basis for that. success. Those are the principles that have made us a marketable commodity. I can only conclude that the close proximity to your decision-making process Must have temporarily clouded the vision of Mayor Clark and my peers. 150 North First Avenue' Board of County Commissioners Nildsboro, Oregon 9/124 Phone :508 / 648 -868 1 tIvAl I have apologized on behalf of the region for S putting your organization in the political arena. At this time, I request that you let me assist you out of that same arena I am certain that Mayor Clark and the Portland, Development Commission have not lost focus of our common commitment to region and to Oregon, and will so acknowledge. Let the upon merit and analysis, let me work with my peers, and believes be based will alb, win at we Bonnie Le Ha Yo Chairman Board of Commissioners` !,PANIES ALPHABETICALLY son NA ' Cow NA STELLAR DISTRIBUTION INC SUS•1 ( Sul✓ sr U 5 TRUCK LINES INC OF CE) 202 Mont xMry Rd, Mont, om.r1, NY ,tip 124599799 re (914) 457.9657 90 4721 Trahsporual &oklrne $ P R TRANSIER CO SUB.1 (,Baby 01 U 5 TRUCK LINE$ IND OF DE) 30918ropdrvey, O avel4od, OH Zip &Is 21+ 16 rU(216)241,7622 Sp 4 taxi rtucun Aitutittny 7RAM3PORT REALTY co INC SUB,1 ■Supy or U S TRUCK 1INE5 INC 00 CE) 629 Eteelid Ari, CtavPlnk ON Z 541 NA 4 r' (216)241'630 Lipp $ L7513ft t tC U $1 BROKERAGE INC 4UB.1 21010 Conk Rldp9 Rd, Clipt3P6ld 08 DE) a 44116 7w (236) 331.4296 4• 723M Tr n ,t4 n WOO ft 014k py UNION TRANSMIT CO SUSI (SUtry of U 3 TRUCk LINES INC OF 0E) 660 Fard n 130, 0sstrolt, Nd lip 46226 74/ (315) 642.2575 5 s NA Op NA 3,C HIGHWAY INC StJd•1 (Ally of u 8 TR',100. L1N@S INC Of 0E) 9001 St4440Ille Rd,'Chlrrktt$r, N0 To 28213 Sin NA env 3 597.7681 NO 4213 Ltrid,Wstinco 1 u klna Chalet Nog* Ain:* 0.t14s 10236.2491 U $ WEST INC (GO) 7800E Orchard Rd, Enrietwobd. 00 0 40111 NI (301 793,6800 S it 8440MM fnfp 60500 1704 62922062 4#r ChM. t4Whittt (k NA NOw -Yolk NY Acxm 4opera tl t yhrand a' 6* USW 1'0 1 'NYS PISS PCS SC 4811 2741 5063 6189 5642 6831 74400ntmunketions 1.01 d108 *IAN 'quit A MseAlllster Ch 'r 'likhard 0 PAttormkh Prcao „ How Dt�lrr CFO tor VP Jolts t~ N'lllfrn04n Ch1f/Pin# O6Ih FP LiNen rte W 0 Mutri Jr CY 09,4d Gerti aim* Jo4Mt VIII VP AS At 446 *MN Stever Ns Holm ANoiri Pri w LAltd w4lfurr Vp fid m Wlihhim Jai►ra T Ar Goth rt VP rr Rkhant J C4llehin Op VP bAwolikt1 tip SUS;IIMARY LISTINt {5) SOAPIEST PROP IINC IiUS.1 (5uu6Yolu5W 1TINC) 1449 8teadwtf Sit 2000, 04 tr, 0 60202 1.1(303 )292.7000 Sal 198MM EMI) 200 St 8552 ' Fldak Est*t4 Subdlvlidir9 i 049,1404r4 ithrfit1,1, 51014 Pr LANOMARK PUBLISHING 00+ OUD'a ts.S'oyLis4iE$T1NC )t31iy5: hlerVard, Over, 50231 re (305) NA !ntp 9000 7 A1Wiley Mltcetllett9ou rlr1un5 U $ WEST DR CT4 SUA,1 (SUb'' LANDMARK PU6LISHINo 00) 251101 Now*e, Aurnr44, to i NA tow ow 2400337,t3696 She 2741 Publlih48 Thloli4n4 01reitorld9 +vJebr Lllr 14+ /404NITAIN STATE TELE ILO CO4 $41 (Subs of t1$ WEST INC X101 Ci1llornIa $, toot, z4 65202 rot (303).524,1424 4410 1470144 Ernp 29500 se 4011 Talsrrnmt iniUon Sdr4lcoii 4A ti nt+ii .A' `i) MA UR NOME TELEPHONE � 6 2 ( Sub / ut MOUNTAIN Alms, TEIIt 11L0 001) 22338''2iM C itirfo, 06 9711+4 >W (003) 535,5123 iA,irti ipiil it1tSN AtibU% OUR' DIRtoTO%IEs 4IAL1. 0O0 604066: OH 6MM imp 30 $ J-�4�61n11 t�alrphorio C mrnunketl 4rVka NORTHWESTERN SELL CORP Sun,' (Subyof 119 WEST IN0) 1314 Po en 071.1'444414 0tnah4, NE 27p 68102 To/ (402) 422.2000 Sea 2170MM Emp 13300 51C 4511 T11101604 t ommunicetbna $erv49 Jinke5t8na> CO. 'Q NORTHWESTERN SELL TELE CO4 S11b.2 (Sdby of NORTHWESTERN (ELL CORP) 1314 0p*E1a4 05.T63•M411, Oo1s44, NE 4 p 68102 Tel (402) 422,2000 544e 2240MM Erne 15200 S; 4811 Te14pho64 t",ommt41k.tion4 °Jankul 0 St** Pr dr0 PACIFIC NORTHWEST 6EL1 CORP sun.), (soy tri U S WEST lN0) 1500 7th Ave, Stmt!!, WA Zp 98101 rrl (206) 3482211 $ 4 74811 4 4 Provldo91X419 Tolbexnmunkitkot &urio4 It EXthan44 Ass sAAArrvvidnhv V Smith Re PACIFIC NORTHWEST SELL TEL CO4 $U i 1 (SOY PeU2 WEST 180) 1600901 ft Stia, WA 4' 98151. cal (206) 3492211 Ski 1690MM Emp 13900 4811 Tatoph6 i Campriny WEST OM 1S GROUP INC SJJO.1 (Subyo4US WEST INC) 1600 714 AO, Soettia, WA Zp 96191 T' (206) 345.2211 ,is 7656MM fine 58000 sc , 4811 Yeteeon munkatkma ServMNi 1 3 ST Smith INFO SVC S, 5118.1 (Soby of U $ WEST INC) 147$ LOWntt1<4 Ste 600, 0envir, CO spa 80202 7.1(303) 592,6000 541$1 07MM !,»p 710 7392 4911 Gosiv unkatlott9 0cn344ltIna 5aivlteo A Telephortio cocrteoaketiert 135 W tr ENTERPRISES INC 996,1 (say O WEST INC) 9394 W Ond(t Rd Ste 100, 06146a, NE 21p 68114 lot (402) 390,6400 3, 7391 l signs r"mp NA ..NA VIII 139114446 unkatk+n tlgtriprrtart U5w DANASCIALSER) ' $06.1 8200 $ ()An SW 330, Enalowrood, CO .145 0011 NA 1 e (303/ 179,2393 Soks Se 6)59 AaaN bled Londki3 Thyme R Purcell CA 9d 147 CEO U $ WEST INFORMATION SYSTEM$ SUB .1 (Suby oy U S WEST INC) 6200 $ Quibet, Englewood, CO Zo Shcb9$ NA 1 E Ti 809,6700 (1000 Slt 5900 1731 7609 7972 Rot inxt ihru ri 6 $ viee T4lotatnmunlrettort Eauli ,*t 5ylien+i 6 CONpttter Salvias U S ' NEWVECTOR GROUP INC SU61 (00 U s A$TINe) 3360 16141 AS PC 4.111944, WA. hp 98006 7:1 (206) 747.4900 54140 101MM &np 620 SA7 4811 $099 5005 Moblle TeIspho 4 b3* ✓ 6I Til4pllpft rt 0'11+P1,S 04 +1159,5048 U T I CORP 200 W 7th AVi, C411004ll14 PA 4 18426 7.! (2 255) 539.0700 000 57114 Einp 570 3112 5063 Mnlr'Matil Tulong 4 Whl tilrclt4siMa ' oA (*ti MOtrtwsr1n4 Pr SUBSIDIARY LISTING(S) ELUCt11010OL$ INC. SUN Moor u T I C04P), 2360 5 27th Ara, M ►►'D1_41 IL Zip 60163 red 0/2)631.6110 $11( i,101MM smp 34. se 5061 EIOtt1`Oda Mtt4tl�t 6 Att isorlot ier Bli�trlt� Diicharse Mathihin8 tnauitis' sFtenk Pullnko Jr P1 (1 T I gNERGY CORP r2a.9o$l 486 Dean pick Or, Wirynr, PA 0 14067 re (216) 971,9600 Uri 51 imp 350 SC 366999 Contract (XI & Ora Drlllkii Rot 011 fink! 5uppl144 °Vioan E Drum 17E0 °Anthony MMxtlelno $r 1'p rr SUBSIDIARY LISTING(S) UNIVERSAL WELL SERVICES INC SUI1.1 (tub), df U Y I ENERGY c06P) 2489 grow Rd, Wd4stir, OH 0 44691 141(216) 2644109 big 1,04404 Emnp 140 Se 1385 OU ou W411 Flald 5 rs 'atny J Gtr* Pr= D.0 ^N.$ 04.8344034 UAL. CORP tot) 1200 Atarnuuln Rd, Elk OM* Tt+vmihtp, IL dip 60007 1'41(312) 932.4000 $bIti6290MM &mo 62000 Aif 45656entgt Ilk 04100 Arch Arthur Andersen & 04 chk401 to S*1 UA(, rah ESE CIN M52 NYS 165 SA°. 4511 7011 6411 4711 Al, Troillorilbn i *Ong Mica 'Storms M 1)tif Ch Bd P CEO +Jnhn C Pope GPO e,0 ti Tr 4 maa M Guy*t14 t1 VP Johit R $olttF,a, Ea VP Ed d M I4r�NIrJvi $r Woo/ Cbunhvl J 4401) T Kati 1,P 8c6 A ArniatTAN4 Midraw F 81117th✓, Rlehie P Gaotey, E Y44441104 Matt N'1111arn M *klne, kith Krrpa, chi1n F Lint, Fuss Mnludst John F Mt iI}c' dy, Hwy Mull*, Junes J 4't onnor, Fmk 1 Cyo4n, Nkhot$4 R ('ett7, Rook 517911!4 SUBSIDIARY LISTIMC( i) MILEAGE PLUS INC 11118'l {SRabyof' UAL CORP) 4505 Olien Ave, VenIte, CA ZS NA 2 ma NA) 827,11100 S+O` 7331 Dfrltt M+II Advottlslne �JOhrt R Wit an Ch UAL LEASING INC 5115,1 (PO o1UAL 0 671 1200 AIpnolii Rd, Elk Ottivi tilt, IL 4' 00007 ril (312) 952,4000 SAW $ 91i44130604 94 1.010 Alr noItt UNITED AI LINES INC SUB' 1 (1u(ly 111 UAL C0RP) 1200 Al6n4 In Rd, Elk On1vs VIGIL t (1 6241 4 �0MM Ent 610� se 4211 Mr Trrnsporiidon SiNkae t AVo Ca U VACATIONS INC SUB.! (Syby of UAL 001NA) 100, Cgtpoesti 71 Ste 200, 0ulYsir Cityr:CA, 310 90236 F'6l (213) 4104246 Os NA 1+00 210 Al 4722 WhI `Fours °John R 7.tMtlt ti r3M 6k1 b.Lhiv.$ 10,241,2442 URI BAMCoRP INC (Olaf 2008 Fronk PhiIIIpi 010d, 8ertl46WIle, OK . . 4' 74003 NI (CO') 2366010 $ilas NA (e p 10) 8k Uri 914 6 Tt $ 60 6 Uik !041 Dbrieldion Pr chifoot a'Iorti n $0 fir $UDSIDIARY UNICI :OK i T€P, SUeil (stirry'ei uer OANCORP NI) 100E Fr** Phylls elvd, S4rtlsraWtl+r, bll 4 74003 7.1(516) 3$0,98510 silk NA Oro 100 5 *l17S 'Bea 'Gen 0 tied tte ffi ' 90 04/30 1.4: 31 2a503 -2y -949 y.. ! KA1'IPtc .L eon MEMORANDUM TO: Gerald Edwards - Mayor, City of Tigard Pat Riley ,,.City Administrator, City of Tigard FROM �aui L Brockbank . Project Director, Trammell Crow Company DATE: April 30, 1990 RE: US West Direct's Portland Headquarters Attached you will find a summary sheet concerning US ' thorough scat Direct 's tbc�rou market searcl, analysis, and decision made concerning them' new Portland headquarters. addition, 1 , have attached a copy of the Letter of Intent and other documentation that should prove helpful in understanding the seriousness of the commitment that was made both On the part of US West Direct and Trammell Crow Company. Please note that our primary concern is one that gries far beyond this transaction, As you know, are in the competitive business of' rest estate; we know we will not make vu 1�niruw we a some transactions. The involvement of Mayor Clark, Pred Stickel, Bob Ares , the Portland Development Commission and other members of the Association for Portland Progress (APP) in my opinion is fair, justified and even good business, However, the with Mayor Clark problem y k and, the ethers intervcntion is not the encouraging encouraging or even pressuring, rather the time at which the pre ure was applied: The search for the ressur>an tat �rathe the US West Direct Portland headquarters has been cod tmonly known for the put a18 months. And it is very inappropriate that after a decision has been made and major commitments are executed between two parties that such a lobbying effort take place. Our concern is that we cannot survive in an environment where a simple real estate transaction or an y eo ther bus �ess decision be proposed, anal y zed and decided up on based on it's ow m erits If the criterium becomes who can wield the most political and civic pressure, then this becomes an environment that only a few can succeed in. In essence, we feel that good healthy competition tlpetition between states, cities, and local jtw sdictions is all well and good es long as it is done ethically. We cannot survive in an environrnent where transactions are nullified such as this. We appreciate your efforts concerning anything that you think could be done to combat this situation so that we will be able to create an env ronrnteitt in whack we all can succeed on our own merits: Should you have any questions, please on 't hesitate to call me at 503/245.9409 Post•it'u t rarid fait transmittal memo eli bf patios r Air A': lir �4p9. Phq: ,. 0 nx -11-Y '1 C?11 S •4 4.46 ..��.J .G.JJ J"itott1 £ 11r1. . 1 1J/L US WEST DIRECT AND LINCOLN CENTER FIVE DEAL SUMMARY gh throughout the Portland metropolitan US West direct conducts a thorough search thra�r aart t area for a new Portland headquarters that would accommodate 380 employees, mostly sales people. 1988 - March 1990. ° During this search all buildwto -suit, leasehold and remodel options were thoroughly analyzed in all quadrants of the metropolitan area Key issues in this analysis were US West phone service, free covered parking in close proximity to the building at 4/1,000 square feet, Atm ,d' nt cia re, immediate freeway access and an abundance of employee amenities Trammell Crow Company's Lincoln eoln Center Five was selected because it met the above listed criteria. On March 2, , West Direct initiated and authored a binding Utter of Intent that hat � 1990, US West Direct and Trammell Crow Company to the following bound US � "the general terms and conditions...! ° " they will negotiate, in good faith, exclusively with each other for the a purpose of entering into a Lease for the Leased Premises;, "Trammell Crow Coznpany will not permit the Lased Premises to be leased an y party third ar Y during the negotiation period (March 22, 1990 April 27, 1990) ;" Q "Upon n inquiry ��x an y other prospective tenant, Trammell Crow will adviae such party that the used Premises is currently under option," Upon execution of the Letter of Intcn dXzntnell Crow Company immediately j in.fr+rmed AT &T and others (General Electric, C GNA, SUN Microsystems, Apple p ` , tronics, Chevrolet) that the spade was unavailable for lease. Trammell afar, NEC C Fief ` ga notify ' . that the space was o� arnn��lp o'1'y was obligated to rratr these tenants and others P Y the letter of intent and to avoid any bad faith the market to cozn 1 with t liability, April 5„ 1990: US West Direct and Trammell Crow Company finalize legal . P oints, Friday, April 6, 1990. Lease redrafted rne,o or �e as ail acing US `Vest Direct s counsel's input. 4�9VQ,c, r 90 04/30 14:32 V503-1- `i -940 TRAMMELL PDT; Sometime between April 5, 1990 and the rnorning of April 9, 1990, U$ West Direr receives solicitations from Bud Clark, Mayor of Portland Fred Stickel, Publisher of the Oregonian Bob Ames, Officer of First Interstate Bank of Oregon US West Direct is encouraged to be good ''corporate citizens" by staying in downtown Portland` After these calls, US West Direct expresses concern about negative press due to a relocation to Washington County, City of Tigard, even though they would still be in the US West service area and only ten minutes from downtown. On Monday, April 9, 1990, Tonya Xing with US West notifies Trammell Crow Company and it's counsel that US West intends to breech it's letter of intent due to "p(lhttcai and civic pressure," April 11, 1990; US West Direct transmits a letter in which US West Direct states; �u�E, . . the recent concerns expressed by the City of Portland's civic and political to .f �, �y termins� es negotiations (see letter dated April 11, unu .,a 199ti )a West Direct On April 11, 1990, Trammell Crow Company imrnediately notifies AT&T of the developments with the US west Direct transaction. On April 12, 1990, AT&T notifies cs us that they have made other cornnntirlen't$ that cannot be broken. [1003 •O r O .+4 06/97=1. TI (I II1EL. ►- F I i JA. co l_riN •'Y ' [,-t 1 •E Olc i_;=,Nfl OR • 9722. .Serving Greater POrtland VOLUME 7, NUMBER PUBLISHED AVERY WEEK WEEK O F AP FU L 23-29, i { direct has line an suburban site Business group pressures phone directory publisher to keep operation downtown By STEM. LAW US West Direct was going to let its fin.. gers do the walking all the way to Tigard. ant the phone div.ectory company's planned move to the suburbs is on hold as a result ofa campaign by business and city leaders -to keep -it,ia downtown Portland. US West Direct, which publishes the white and yellowpages directories, was set to relocate its 300-employee. Portland op=, eration from Harrison: Square on I WO S.W., First. Ave. to Trammell Crow Co.'s newve Lincoln: Center near Washington Square, according to informed real estate sources- But_an effort launched by the Associa- 'ion for Portland Progress (APP), .n downtown business group, has reportedly prompted US West: Direct to reconsider its move. The APP effort is being supported by Portland: Mayor Bud Clark and the Portland Development Commission (PDC),- the city urban renewal and eco- nomic de jelopmentagency, "Political sources downtown have flexed their muscles, and tJS West is rear- rigid," said one informed source who asked to remain anonymous. US West Di- rect had signed a `jbindirg letter of in- tent' to lease about 78,000 square feet from Trammell: Crow, the source sand. US West Direct is considering a move and will weigh Jowntown and suburban locations, said company spokeswoman Carolyn Kennedy, But the company is only in the "very, very early stages of dis- cussions of where we want to live in the next fur years," sire said. ;`I don't think we'reat a decision- making stage: A letter of intent has been signed for Five Lincoln Center, Kennedy acknowl- edged. But that only signaled an agree- ment to enter negotiations fora lease, she said, and wouldn't be legally binding. Downtown business interests have be- come increasingly concerned by a Slow of companies to the suburbs.. Several months age the APP formed a business retention committee, in parr to stem suburban_ flight_ US West Direct is considered a high- profile company, and a 78,000-square-feet lease -would' be one of the. largest Portland- area real estate transactions o€ the year _ The Oregonian publisher Fred Stickel, who is a member of APP,, contacted US West Direct president Jinn Logan in Den - ver, said Ruth Scott, APP executive director. Please turn to pip _21 A C4. 1ttrrf`'ng�ty�:otr.�,ifrj- - 4 T Continued 'We w� assured: by Logan that node- vision had been. made wkialsoever," Scott said. - APP- wanted' to know what problems the phone; directory publisher had. with its current location . and how those could be remedied in a downtown Locale, she said. The company has cited a need for ample an debit- effeedve parking. Scott said downtown. has an "excellent parking supply" and stressed the city's need: to retain companies like US est,Di- nee for ecanomic,reaaons. "It's essential that a central city, remain the hub of a region,' she said. "That's: where office industz.y belongs. Mayor Clark uraged:tbe city devel- opment nt camuSssioa to joins, the effort to keep US West DSreet . t WEEK OFAP L. 23, 1990 st�Direct reconsiders Lease at Five Linco}in Cent+ PA tan t. PDC seeks to lure new businesses to Portland as well as retain existing compa- nies. "We always hate to see any net move- ment out of the downtown,': said Jan Bur €eson, PDC director of economic de- velopment. "The hcalthand'vitality of the tlowntowi is important for the entire re- gion." IJS West Direct resident Logan agreed to a �`_ at p w4th' P s n�A to Ante has b E, d , Scott said last ednesday. Logan was away aom iris o!' celast. week. and could; not bereached for wain:tent_ US West Directs Portland office pro- duce-5 21 Oregon phone directories, Ken- nedy said. The company publishes more than 40 million_ books overall 14 states. cations company witI annual sales of $9.2 bialioaa. US West Inc.'s real estate subsidiary, Beta West Properties Inc is working with the local office of Cushman & Wakef icld of Oregon Inc. real estate brokerage to identify alternative sites for the local phone book publisher, Other US West op- erations in l ortland are not affected by the phone book company's site plans. 13a�rid' Whitt, Trammell Crow' director of office eveiopthent, decline o em- inent o s" a t Duet:[ deal. But he said the [25,000-square-foot Five Lincoln nterizas already lured one downtown tenant, Travelers Insurance Co., since its ? larch 1 completion. Travel- = shifted alt but four employees out of the U.S. Bancorp Tower and relocated 50 an overt, sand. Tim It is a subsidiary of US West iite_, a employees into 14,500 square feet a the mayor's executive assts- pnbl'u:iy trade -t°l sq at Five Gallagher, telephone anti saan,mtana- Lincoln Center. The bottom three floors of the floor building arc substantially le Blakesaid, Other Five Lincoln Ccnte ants include IDS Financial Services IngrimlMills architects, Continent: surance Companies, First Union l gage Corp. and Donaincz.o's`Restaur: If us West moves to the building, Lincoln Center Would be almost tall cupied. Few ciowniiowix or suburban buildings achieve such higli occup shortly after being constructed. Lincoln Center is a complex of fh Tice buildings on Greenburg Road, c site Highway 217 front Wash in Square. The buildings total about 60 square feet of office space. Lincoln Center and the Kruse Way ridor in Lake Oswego are considerei two most prestigious suburban office tings lit The netropolitart area Suburban offices can be built r cheaply than downtown Portland b ings, due to lower -cost land and cons- don methods. Suburban offices typi. offer free parki=ng, which is a major Fs for cempat1ies choosing to leave de town The average office needs about parking spaces for each 1,000 square of Leased space, said Blake of Tratn Crow. A typical downtown parking sl costs S80 to $100 a month. Depending who pays for the parking, a suburban floe setting offers Least savings for c ►yip es c or employees A 90 04/30 14: 31 b03 -293'-9409 MEMOR.AND:UM TO: Gerald Edwards u Mayor, City of Tigard Pat Riley ,. C`aty Administrator, City of Tigard OM: atilt L T3rockbank • Project Director, Trammell Crow Company DATE: April 3O 1990 RE: 'US West Direct's Portland Headquarters Attached you will find a summary sheet concerning US West Direct's thorough market search, analysis, and decision made concerning their new Portland headquarters. In addition, I have attached a copy of the Letter of Intent and other docutnentation that should prove helpful in understanding the seriousness of the Commitment that was made both part ell Crow Company. tea on the , a.xt of US West Direct and Trammell Please note goes far beyc,nd this transaction, As our primary ., , , one that ° we know we will not make Fled a that ou . we are it the competitive business of real estate; ,�► concern is you know, w involvement mt of Mayor Clark, Fred Stickel, Bob Ames, the n:�. The n y some transactiQ ° np Association for Portland Portland Development Commission and other members of the t�ssoci ' ever" the Progress (APP) in my opinion is fair, justified and even good business. However, problem Mayor others intervention is not the encouraging or evert . etventiori r� was applied. The search , for roblern v�itla l�•a or dark and the other pressure the pressuring, me at which the p pF �f ,arrn but rather he cad uurters has been ,ianlg� known for � the past 18 the US West Direct Portland h q months. And it is 'vet`y inappropriate that after a decision has been made and major commitments are executed between two parties that such a lobbyyir *,.effort take place, Our concern is that we eantrot Survive in an environment where a simply teal estate transaction or any other business decision cannot be proposed, analyzed and decided upon bas ' If the criterium heco the most political based on it's own araerii�. mes who can. wield and civic F ressure, then this becomes' an environment that only a few can succeed in. Ir essence, we feel that good healthy competition between states, cities, and local jurisdictions is all well and good as long as it is done ethically. We cannot 'survive in an environment where transactions are nullified such his this. We appreciate your effort; concerning anything that you think could be done to combat this situation so that we Fill be able to c environment in which create an environ raen h we all can succeed on our own merits. Should you have any �� uestions, please don't hesitate to call me at 5031245 -9400. y PTh /fr Post»UU'" brand fax transmittal memo 7671 # al m os 10 C; ept, C •kit' `1f Sr 5 g � r V 4 l 1,11.111 .1L.1..L.' US WEST 1 n Ecr AND LINCOLN CENTER FIVE DEAL SUMMARY US West Direct conducts a thorough search throughout the Portland metropolitan area for a new Portland headquarters that would accommodate 38() employees, mostly ;ua1es people. 1988 - March .1990. During this ° search all buildatd.suit, leasehold and remodel options were thoroughly analyzed in all quadran+s of the Metropolitan. area. Key issues in this analysis were US West phone service, free covered parldng in close proximity to the building at 4/1,000 square feet, &Raba immediate freeway B ess and an abundance of employee amenities.; Trammell crow Company s ,nco1n tenter Five was selected because it met the above listed criteria. On March 22, 1990, US West Direct initiated and authored a binding Letter of Intent that bound US West Direct and Trammell Crow Company to the following; the general terms and corrditio .. "they will negotiate, in good faith, exclusively with each other for the purpose of entering into a Lease for the Leased Premises" 'Trammell (...-row ompany 3,4111 not permit the Leased Premises to be leased by any third party durn8 the negotiation period (March 22, 1990 - April 27, 1 );" "Upon inquiry from any otter prospective tenant, Trammell Crow will advise such party that the Leased Premises is currently under option." Upon execution of the Letter of Intent., Trammell Crow Company immediately informed AT&T an d Others (General Electric , �1s�A, SUN Micr osyst eens; w Apple Computer, l C Electronics, Chevrolet) that the spat was unavailable for leas, Trammell Crow was obligated to notify these and others that the w off the market to comp y with the of intent and to avoid any b ad faith liability. April . 5, 1990: US West Direct and TramP e11 Crow Company finalize legal points. Friday, April 6, 1990: Lease is redrafted incorporating US West Direct's counsel's input: L Vti o• ° '90 04/30 14:32 TT603 ' " '3 -9409 TRAMMELL PDX Sometime between April 5, 1990 and the morning of April 9, 1990, US 'West Direct rec ives solicitations from ° Bud Clark, Mayor of Portland ° 'red Stickel, Publisher of the Oregonian Bob Ames,. Officer of First Interstate Bank of Oregon 118 West Direct is encouraged to be good °'corporate citizens" by staying in downtown Portland. After these calls, US West Direct expresses concern about negative press due to a relocation to Washington County, City, of Tigard, even though they would still be in the US West service area and only ten minutes from downtown. On Monday, April 9, 1990, Tonya gains with US West notifies Trammell Craw Company and it's counsel that US West intends to breech it's letter of intent due to "political and civic pressure." April 11, 1 US West Direct transmits a letter in which US West Direct states: "due to the recent concerns expressed by the City of Portland's civic and political community..." US West Direct terminates negotiations (see letter dated April 11, 1) On April 11, 1990 Trammell Crow Company immediately notifies AT&T of the developments with the US West Direct transaction. On April riil 1 1 � , AT&T notifies us that � 12, tx ' at tltey have made other commitments that mint 1t broken tg'003 *********k 11 -4-**: •-7 T G T 0208A1 n6/9-7! i.r-tr-NUEL CROW E,f DAN BnYPEN 1 o z7O ` w ORCENDURn Rif PORTLAND OR 9722 rri t? 0 LO Business group pressures phone directory publisher to keep operation downtown triry 11337 E la. LAW US West Direct was going to let its fin - gers: do the waking all the way to T igard. But the phone directory company's planned move: to the suburbs is ou hold as a result of a campaign by business; and city leaders to keepritir dowrtown Portland. US West Direct, which publishes the wh iteana yellow pages directories, ectories, was set to relocate its 300 - employee Portland op- eration from Harrison Square on 1800 S.W. First Ave.. to Trammell Crow Co.'s new Five Lincoln Center ne. r WashMgtort Square, according to informed real estate sources. But art effort launched by the Associa- don for Portland Prog.-ess (APP), a dotvntGvn'business group_ . has reportedly prompted tiS West Direct tb reconsider its move The APP effort is being supported by Portland Mayor Bud dark and the Portland Development Commission (PDC) the city urban renewal and eco- nomic development agency... "Political sources downtown have flexed their muscles, and US West is wor- ried, said one informed source Who asked to remain anonymous. US West_ Di- rect. had signed a " binding letter of in- tent"' to lease about 78,000 square feet from Trammell Crow, the sourcesa €d_ US West Direct is considering a move and will weigh do wntown and suburban locations, said company spokeswoman Carolyn Kennedy. But Elie company is only in the "very, very early stages of dhs ussions of where we want to live in the next: few years, she said. "1 don't think we're at a deeision- raking stage.' A letter of intent has been signod for Five Lincoln Center. Kennedy acknowl- edged. But that only signaled an agree- ment to enter negotiations for a lease, she said, and wouldn't be legally binding. Downtown business interests have be- come increasingly concerned -by a flow or companies to the suburbs. Several months ago the P formed a business retention committee, in part to stem suburban high€_ US West Direct is considered a high- pro file company, and a 78,000- square-feet lease would be one of the largest Portland- area real estate tra sactions of the year. The Oregonian publisher Fred Stickel, who is a member of APP, contacted US West Direct president Jim Logan in Den- ver, said Ruth Scott, APP -executive director. Please tuna tc page 21 st 4tt_EKOF PAUL 23,199G PP yirect reconsiders lease at Five Lincoln Centp c a ed rou page a ‘!We were: assured by Logan that no de- ' cision had been made whatsoever," Scott said. APP wanted to know what problems: the phone directory publisher had with its current location and how those could be remedied in a downtown locale, she said. The company has cited a need for ample and cost. - effective parking. Scott: said downtown has an "excellent parking supply" and stressed ` the city's need to retain companies like US West Di- rect for economic reasons. "IVs essential that a eutral city remain the hub of a regime, '' she said. "That's where your office industrg belongs." Mayor Clamk encouraged.t city sieve@- oprnent 'commission to join the effort to keep US West Direct in town, said Tim Gallagher, the mayor's executive assi -- t.ant. PDC seeks to lure new businesses to Portland as well as retain existing compa- nies. "'We always bate to see any net move - anent out of the downtown,' said Jan Burreson,. PDC director of economic de- velopment. "The healthand vitality of the downtown is important for the entire re- gion?' US West Direct ,resident Logan agreed to arn_` j Aniaraii no -late has= l Scott said last l ednesday. Logan was away row rs of - ticelast week and could not bereached for comment_ US West .Direct`s Portland office pro- duces- 21 Oregon phone directories, Ken- nedy said.. The company publishes more titan 40 milli= books overall in 14 states. It is a subsidiary of US West 'rte_, a publicly traded telephone and conunuiu- cations company with annual sales of $9.2 billion. US West Inc.'s real estate subsidiary, Betas West Properties inc., is working with the local office of Cushman &'Wakefield. of Oregon Inc. real estate brokerage to Identify alternative sites for the local phone book publisher. Other US West op- erations in PPortand- are not affected by the phone book company's site plans. David Blake, Trammell Crow's director of .offi-c'e—Weieioprnent declined o com- ment on a tDi.et d But he said the 125,000- square -foot Five Lincoln Centerhas already lured one downtown tenant, Travelers Insurance Co., since its Max& 1 completion . Travel- ers shifted all but four employees out of the U.S. Bancorp Tower and relocated 50 employees into 14,500 square feet at Five Lincoln Center. The bottom three floors of the floor building arc substantially k Blakesaid. Other Five Lincoln Ccntc ants include IDS Financial Services Ingrinz /lMlills architects, Continent: surance Companies, First Union gage Corp. and Donriricco's Rcstaue If US West moves to the building, Lincoln Center would be almost Cali cupicd. Few clove atoWrr or suburban c buildings achieve such high occur shortly after being constructed. Lincoln Center is a complex of Eh rice buildings on Grcenburg Road, c site Highway 217 from SVashin Square: The buildings total about t X square feet of office space. Lincoln Center and the Kruse Way ridor in Lake Oswego are considere' two most prestigious suburban office linos in the metropolitan area Suburban offices can be built r cheaoly than downtown Portland b ings, due to lower -cost land and cons. don methods. Suburban offices typi. offer free parking, which is a major fs for companies choosing to leave do town. The average office needs about t parking spaces for each l,000 square of Leased space, said Blake or Tram Crow. A typical downtown parking sl s:osts SSD to $100 a month. Deper:din; who pays for the parking, a suburban Tice setting offers Lost savings for crap ersor-einplo gees. • ' 90 04/30 14:31 °,°503- 293 -9409 TRAMMELL PDX MEMORANDUM '0 Gerald Edwards - Mayor, City of Tigard Pat Riley - City Administrator„ City of Tigard FROM: 4Vaul J. 1 rockbank - Project Director, Trauma Crow Company DATE; April 3O 1990 I US West Direct's Portland Headquarters Attached you will find a summary Sheet concerning US West Directs thorough market search analysis, and decision made concerning their new Portland headquarters, In addition, 1 have attached a copy of the Letter of Intent and other documentation that should prove helpful in understanding the seriousness of the commitment that was made both on the part of US West Direct and Trammell Crow Company. primary transaction. Please note that our riri�a concern is one that goes far beyond this you know, we are in the competitive business d real estate; we know we will not make some transactions. The involvement of Mayor Clark, Fred Sti e1, Bob t ,�s, tile Portland T..)ew►elopxneut Commission and other members of the Association for Portland Progress (APP) in my opinion is fair, justified and even good > business However, the ' encouraging or evert problem with Mayor Clark and the others intervention is not the ens the pressuring, but rather the time at which the pressure waS applied. The search for the U West Direct P headquarters has been commonly known for the past 18 ortla months. it is v na rc rite that after a decision has been made and major commitments are executed bet en two parties that such a lobbying effort place. .... . Our concern is that we cannot survive in an environment where a simple real estate �► r y. ., proposed, .y transaction or any other business decision cannot be analyzed and derided upon based on it 'a own merits, If the � � becomes who can wield the most political environment e cr�t�r�rmr� and civic pressure, then this becomes an ern ° rnent that only a few can sued in. In Ossencer we feel that good healthy =petition between states, cities, and locai j .riSdictions is Ali: well and good as long as it is done ethically. We cannot survive in an environment where transactions are nullified' such is this. We appreciate your efforts concerning anything that you think could be done to combat , . this situation so that we will be able to create an environment in which we all Can succeed on our own merits. Should you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call 1r10 at 503/245-9400. P.1/fir Po0W0 brand fax transmittal memo 7671 Not pages 4 F� 4 90 04/30 14:32 V503-293-9409 TRAMMELL PDX US WEST DIRFXIT AND LINCOLN CENTER FIVE DEAL SUMMARY US West Direct conducts a thorough search throughout the Portland metropolitan area for a' new Portland headquarters that would accommodate �� ra�c�da.te 380 employees, mostly sales people. 1988 March 1.. During this search all build-to-suit, leasehold and remodel options were thoroughly analya d in all quadrants of the metropolitan area Key issues in this analysis were West phone service, free covered ... close proximity to the building at 4/1,000 square feet, da n parking in immediate 1�� g ' 9 � of employee �x ey immediate re y . wa. a,�� and an abundance amenities. s. Trammell Crow Company's Lincoln Center Five was selected because it met the above aisted criteria. On March 22, 1990, US West Direct initiated and authored a binding Letter of Intent that bound uS West Direct and Trammell Crow Company to the followin : 'the general terms and conditions..," "they will negotiate, in good faith, exclusively with each other for the purpose of entering into a Lease for the Leased Premises.," 4°Trammell Crow Company will not permit the Leased Premises to be leased by any third party duritl the negotiation period (March 22, 1990. April 27, Am\ all r "Upon inquiry from any other prospective tenant, Trammell Crow will advise such ar .F ' that the e I.ased Premises fs currently under ofataori,t° Upon execution of the Letter of Intent, Trammell Crow Company immediately informed AT&T and others (General Eidetic, � SUN Microsystems, App e Computer, NEC Electronics, Chevrolet) that the space was unavailable for lease, Trammell Crow was obligated to notify these tenants and others that the space was off the market to comply with the later of intent and to avoid any bad faith liability, April 5, 1990: US West Direct and tratrovoll Crow Company finalize legal points, Friday, April 6, 1000: Lease is redrafted incorporating �r � 6, ` �' g US West Directys counsel's i#1p1at. V 02 a 90 04/30 14:32 12503-293-9409 TRAMMELL PDX Sometime 'between April 5, 1990 ` and ` the morning of Apol 9, 1990, US Wog t Direct receives solicitations from; Bud Clark, Mayor of Portland ° 'red Stickel) Publisher of the Oregonian Boob Ames, Officer of First Interstate Bank of Oregon US West Direct is encouraged to be good ° °corporate citizens'° by staying in downtown Portland. After these calls, US West Direct expresses concern about negative press due to a relocation to Washington County, City of Tigard, even though they would still be in the US West service area and only ten minutes from downtown. On Mond ay, April 9, 1990, Tanya ins with US West notifies 'Trammell Crow Company and it's counsel that DS West intends to breech h's setter of intent doe to "political and civic pressure." April 11, 1990: US West Direct transmits a letter in which US West Direct states: 'due to recent concerns c expressed by the Portland's civic and political community...," U ne ne gotiations West Direct terminates � � iations see letter dated April 11, 1990), On April 11, 1990, Trammell Crow Company immediately notifies AT&T of the el developments s with the US Vest Dire ct transaction. On April 12, 19, A',r T notifies u s that they have ve made other coanmitmetts that cannot be broken. a 11003 . **41.4-Z5 -D ! 14: T �r 3 {i =s 1 t2 f f� �tl iia. `= DAN 19''''lit t 1030n '5114 riTIFFilEd IRri PORT I 13 71 ^ phone directory publisher to keep operation downtown ilsiness group pressures by Portland Mayor Bud C a_ By STEVE LAW US West Direct_ was going to Iet. its gers do: the walking ai the way to Tigard. crt the phonedirectory company's "planned Move totie suburbs is on hold as a resulto €a camp by business and city leaders to keep.-it in downtown Portland. US- West Direct, which punishes the whit and yretiiow pages, di €ectcries,,was set to relocate - its 30D-employee Portland op- eration from -Harrison Square on 1300 S.W. First Ave. to 'Fran: ell Crow cos .' new Five Lincolct Center near 'ashi8gt Square,. ace g,toinformed real estate sources- But an effort launched by the. Associa- tion for Portland Progress (APP),, a do .mtown business group, has report y prompted US-West recto reconsider its move.` The API effort is being supported 1 rk acrd the Five Lincelit Center, Kennedy acknowl- Portland Development Commission_ (PDC), the city urban renewal and eco- nomic development agency. Political sources downtown have flexed their uwscles, and US West is wor- ried," said one informed source who asked. to remain anonynnaus. US West Di- rect had signed a ;`bindittg letter of in- tent"' to lease about 7$,000 square feet from Trammell Crows the sourcesaid� US West Direct is considering a ino e and w weigh downtown and suburban locations, said company spokeswoman Carolyn Kennedy. But the company is only in the "very, verb earl stages of tlis- cussions= of where we want to live in the rnexc few years,}' she said_ "`l don't think we're at a decision-making stage" A letter of Intent has been sign? for edged. But that only signaled an agree- ment to enter negotiations for a lease, she said, and wouldn't be legally binding. Downtown business interests have be- come increasingly concerned by a flow of companies to the suburbs_ Several months ago the API' formed a business retention` committee, in part to stem suburban Hight_ US West Direct is considered a high- profile company, and a 78 00- squa €e feet lease would be one of thelargest Portland - area real estate; transactions of the year. The Oregonian publisher Fred Stickel, who is a member of APP, contacted US West Direct president lint Logan in Den- ver, said Ruth Scott. APR executive director_ urogrr WEEKOFAPRIL 23, 1990- PAGE 23 JSWst `Direct reconsiders lease at Five Lincoln Center -,Clitabllied frontline I `!We were assured by?Logan_ that node- cision had beea made whatsoever„" Scott Said_ - APEr wanted to know what problems the phone director publisher had t - its current location and how those could be remedied in a do3matanvie locale, she said. The company has cited a need for ample and cost-effeeetive parking. Scott said downtown has an "excellent parking supplf" and stressed the city's need. to retain: o npanies~1 e US West Di- rect for econ micreasons_ "It's ntial. that a central. city remain the hub of a region," she said. "That's whesc your officeintlustry `belongs~." Mayor Clark euraged the city devel- opment commission to join the effort to, keep US West Direct in tom said Tom. Gallagher., the mayor's executive assis- rant. PDC seeks-to lure new businesses to Pentland as well as retain existing compa- nies. =`We always bate to see any net move- ment out of the downtown," said Jan Surresoo, PDC director of economic de- velopment. C6The healthand'vitality of the - downtown is important for the entire ze- gion." 35 -10.est Dire; t president Logan agreed no dale has` be - t::.. Scott said last \' cdnesday. Logan was away from E is °of face last week and could not be reached for comment. 'US West Direct's Portland office pro- duces 21 Oregon phone directories, Ken r ed s: said_ The company publishes more than 40 million books overall in 14states. It is a subsidiary of US West Inc_, a ptsbl`elY traded telephone and comrnuni to a ma- •.' 4 r ; #?:i cations company with annual sales of $9e2 billion. US West Inc.'s real estate snbsioiary, Beta West Properties Inc., is working with the local office of Cushman & Wakefield of Oregon. Inc. real estate brokerage tc> identify alternative sites for the local phone book publisher. Other US West op- erations in Portland are not affected by the phone book company's site plans. David Blake, Trammell Cane director of- office evelopment, declined 0 com- ment on the I..ES West Direct deal But he said the 125,000-square-foot Five Lincoln Center has already lured one downtown tenant, Travelers Insurance Co,., since its March 1 completion. Travel- = shifted all but four employees out of the U.S. Bancorp Tower and relocated 50 employees into 14,500 square feet at Five Lincoln Center. Ela 0) N Cr) cn co The bottom three floors of the seven - floor building are substantially leased, Blake Other Fire Lincoln Center ten- ants include IDS Financial Service Inc., Ingrin�Ililg, architects, Continental in- surance Conn anies, First Union Mort- gage Corp_ and Doniineca's Restaurant. If US West moves to the building, Five Lincoln Center would be almost fully oc- cnpied. Few d awe E town or suburban office buildings achieve such high occupancy shortly after being constructed, Lincoln Center is a complex of five of- fice buildings on Greenburg Road, oppo- site Highway 2E7 from. Washington Square. The buildings total about an-Aoie square feet of office space. Lincoln Center and the Kruse Way cor- ridor in Lake Oswego are considercdse o, most prestigious suburban office set- tings in the retropo titan area_ Suburban offices cant. be built more cheaply than downtown Portland build - ings, dueto lower -cost and and construe - don methods. Si turban offices typically offer free parking, which is .a major factor for companies choosing to leave down- town. The average office needs about four parking spaces for each 1,000 square feet of leased space, said Blake of Trammell Crow. A typical downtown parking space costs $S0 to $100 a month. Depending nn who pays for the parking, a suburban of- fice setting offers cost savings for employ- ers or employees.. ' 90 04/30 ,4:36 U503 -293 -9409 BENFICIAL RENT COQ CZ ; T a DATE OPT /ON To NE : PARKINOt TRAMMELL PDX Rent r H Direct would pay its p. c as r ion4te share of annual operating expenses, which shall not exceed the following ceilings: Term gorAmtmstl.,Sejaing 4/1/91 3/31/92 4/1/92 �^ 3/31/93 4/1/93 3/31/94 4/1/94 - 3/31/95 4/1/95 -, 3/31/96 $4 .5 a/ rs f /yr $5, .5O rs /yr. ►6.00/rEf/yr. $6 .� 5 O/r f /yr . excluding any tax tAtm increases and any utility Xftta increases which are beyond the control of Landlord- Direct shall tot be obligated to pay any operating expenses whatsoever until the Rent Commencement Date. NoVember 1® 1990, or such, later date as Direct may designate, but in no event later than March , 1991. If the tenant 1-74ProVaments for that Leased Premises are not complete (sulzjeot only to punch last itemS) by aanuary 1i 1991, penalties may be i po ea . ( Direct Can ove in earlier if it so desires but Direct i S earliest MOVe - n date would be dO daYs days after the ea etion of the Lana and approval of don ttruction documents, gents, La dlord will guarantee e , 75 day conOtruotion period s'6 east to force ma j eure) April 10 1991 Landlord agrees to provide Direct with tu'o year options to renew all or part of their 'lease upon six ,months prior written nOtiOsc The net rental rate darinq the first 5 -year option shall be equal to the 1000er of the 'then Prevailing Market rental tate for comparable spate Or $16.73 triple nit /,y* The net rental rate iduring the second 5 ,-year option Shall be t l to the le sser cif t1 a 'thou provaiiiritg Lark t r'a nta1 rate for comp a 1i space of $2035 triple net /rSf/yr., Landlord' d &p 'eea I t provide Direct Stith unreserved par sing Stallti on the Property aft no charge at a ratio of 4 eta1ir for every 1,;000 tee :in the Leased P ew.i t,]009 90 04/30 14 36 T2503-293-9409 TRAMMELL PDX 4010 STORAGE FACILITY: Landlord agrees to provide, at Direct' s option, a $7,000.00 allowance to build a cinder block storage rood in the Five Lincoln center parking struCture. The rental rate for this space will be $0.30 per square foot per month. C SSA Landlord agrees to provide Direct with access to building and parking facilities 24 -hours per day, 7-days per week, 52 wilkoks per Year. SEC ITY: Landlord represents that Lincoln Coi:ter is folly equipped with a , estate -of -the -art Honeywell safety /Security System and a state -of- that -art elevator and entrance card ke,y" Qod.,nc securjty system that will provide Direct with satisfactory-security for the Leased ed premises, and in Particular Dire is computer room. Each Direct emp1 yae stall be provided with a' Honeywell card Which provides access to all of the Lincoln Center exterior doors 24 ''hours per day 7 -days per week, 52- weeks per year Landlord shall provide Direct with 4 , cards/1000 rs t at no charge; and any additional cads maY be purchased by Direct for 10.00/ca.rc s In ac ditio , Direct employees, cards shall L be COded in such a way as to allow access to the Leased Premises after normal busielt hours; avid only certain Direct e aploN 1, , shall Lava Cards coded to allow access s, c.ro Direst a s. computer room. Five~: Lincoln Gaiter a s security system shall be equal to that custonarilY- ound in class i , dowmtown high -rises where the building I6anage Yt i t can program specific access hours fair specific areas A f the building. !era s tsence, a n the loo floors where Direct is the Sole p tenant, tlitair ell doors and the elevators shall Serve as secures . entrances to Direct o s apace The standard open at�x� h�urs �cr �i vs .nCQ1n center shall be Manday - Friday 6130 a* m. to /1100 p. 111 0 and S aturdaY 0:00 a.m. to 1:00 p e m.. In addition, Landlord shall, upon Dinedt' a request, provide shall/ RVAC and other buildineg se is &a to all or a designated part of than Leased PreMises during neon- standard hotirs for a reasonable Charge. Upon Direct g s roguesto Landlord shall also install supplettental air conditioning omits to accommodate the cooling needs of HVAc • ' 90 04/ 30 14:37 12503 -293 -9409 TRAMMELL PDX 10011 the computer an6 other equipment rooms, in addition to supplementing open office loads accordartce vita Dialect t s . pecific at ons and, pursuant to the tenant improvement agreement. Such supplemental adrvicea Teould be r 6parately metered and charged to Direct. SPRINKLERS; tS Landlord represent that the building' has an operating sprinkler System per fire code sATELLXT l Landlord agrees to provide Direct with an ANTEDINA,S option, at Direct' S sale( cost and expense, to install and open ate sending and receiving satellite antennae and cables required on the roof above Five Lincoln tlenter. a Such space required by ` the satellites will be, at no additional charge to Direct. All costs associated with such satellite services shall be at Direct' s sole cast and expense. bIAECTORX LISTINGS Landlord shall . Provide Direct with AND SION'S: liStingS in all of the bt i1ding dixectoriee at no charge. Provided 'Arcot, pays all ;loots and expenses in relation thereto, Direct shall be allowed to platy a Monument sign with. its name and logo (in Direct , ' customary style) outside of Five .nc o1ni Center at a mutually ly agreeable 3.ocation» OTHER FEATURES AND UNITIES OF THE PRO ERT' "; Shall be al provided. in 'Landlord ' 7frevised. proposal letter dated March 14, 1000 s RESTRICTIVE Landlord would agree ( in the fOrm of a a the Lease) that during the COVENANT* ' covenant in and an y a�ert��ral Lease ��. (s) and extension (s) thereof, it would not lease to a party or permit any space in Five Lincoln Center to be used by any Marty who directly, or indirectly through subsidiaries or affiliates or otharoistif e 1ages in the sale, o aMpilation or publiOation for use by the general ptallico of yelloV Pages directories, telephone directories, Or directories intended for distribution to tourists 0r new rc sident§ Of a dountY LEASE VORtili To be negotiated cpod. faith by the partiegl hereto using Landlord's office Leasf as a format. ' 90 04/30 ' 14:34: V503- •293 -9409 TRAMMELL PDX IIJ E DIRECT March 27, 1990 mr. a Paul V. Brc►cank Pro f ect D1ar ecta 'pralmoll Crow Company 10260 S.W. Greenburg Rd. Portland, OR 97223 Re.; Propougal Leas e Five Li ae.coltin Center Dear Mr. Brocithank; The purpose of this letter is to confirm, in writing the general terms and conditions upon whist U S WEST Direct ("Direct") would b'e interested in eriteirinl, into a lease 191.th Lincoln Center phase r Limited Partnership (" ndlc' , ") for office space in fly* CentOr in Portland, Oregon (the to Property ")'. This le : x' is rt t, and Shall not be cons tried as, a lease; but rather it exPresses our desire and 'intent to enter jxxtQ a lapse with the Landlord subject to► good faith legs tia for s between the pares lee e The general termS and conditions are as "fOl1oWS: s VEST Direct rattorbrml tancoln Center P a e V Limited. pa.rtnertl ip BROI 3R BetaWest Ptoperties, inc./Al Hackman All camziesiOrte and Other feet sate to E+etaWe3t, liaataant and any tither, brokers chall be paid by Landlord. Rentab1. 1Jk1 7th Floor 18 d 559 17, 099 6th Floor i.659 i7e/09 Sth P1oo 18,669 7,199 4th Floor 18x67 17,189 2 229 1 70,279 71,925 P MISE5 *ti Pubhthe l 9tm Whliii it ti'&1e w PiOtiattt ksf Mt uittaUt dull. riJorthwagt9 rt Bar) & Patith WbrtnWest Eta 16006 • ,t+ '90 04/30 14 :35 °503- 293 -9409 TRAMMELL PDX 4007 TENANT % PROVEl' N'T$ : Direct may lease all or a portion of the 4t i floor ; subject to further spade planning; oi)tiseguently the Rentable sgaar(x Peet tray change. In additions Landlord would provide at least 30 days Prior written notice of, and a first right of offer to, Direct for additional space on the first and loecorid floors, as and wthen such space becomes available, from the data hereof thrOug t Xarch 310 1992/ to accommodate Tenant' S expansion needs/ if any. The Aentab1e Sictiare Piet on the 7th floor of the Leased ` ?remises is sulDject to red .tion for the 'aconference+ Room" as described below. Landlord would provide Direct with a non-, cash tenant ilImProvement allowance for the Leased Premises which is at least eel ' the cost of the standard improvements provided to other tent,nts on the property "'Tenant standard ") r i.z o1ud:ing but not limited to: 32 ounce out pile carpet. Parabolic lights. ° 2' x 2' M aetrorig acoustical tile. smooth finish 5/8" SpElif'd3,4 wall partitions. VAS' base macnenic l eys Lem with interior and extaa iOr Zones pet Tenant f s space plan standard electrical Per Tenant's spetificatiens p cabinetry Tenant's '� ar aid- lower �a�r.inat ' in. kitchen, lunch root and a tora 'e area Plumbing ` in kitchen per Tenant' s speCificatiOnS but which shall not eXdeeed $15.00/rsf from flour to drop iiing ` (including ceiling tile and and 1+i 1t fi tares) already in place. )1aterial maid labor cha 'gee shall be based upon actual cote paid; by Landlord tc the contractor(s) and Landlord shall net be entitled to any ei dit ,ozia1 aandslement or tOnsttuction fee . tf the cost of the tenant improvements for Di ►eot ez c+ceed. Ditedt' s tOt a1: allowance Diroct shall pay any overage In ad lit on, Lar dioz l's bud dinq architect (e ) and gpaoe p .at tisr (s) Shall he *ride available to Direct; st no charge, fir the purpose of worki.n_g wi h bireat tti design, prepare and f nailite spaOe plans ' 90 04/30 :14:35 503.293 -9409 TRAMMELL PDX 16003 and Plans and specifications for tenant improvements in the Leased premises, irtoluding but not limited to a computer room. Direct shall have up to three opportunities to review and revise said designs, plans and specifications at no charge, and thereafter any further reVisions shall be made at Direct' s expense. In addition to the f" regoingt Landlord shall provides Direct with a spacial design allowance for Direct ' s carAputer roora of $1v°0/ref of computer room space. CO141UTE ROOM: Xn addition to the special design allowance, Landlord shall Provide Direct with a non -Cash tenant improvement allowance of $4O OO/ref for Direct ' s computer room up to a tos, in um of 2, OO4/raf. If the cost of the tenant, improvements ments approved by Direct in the computer room or in the other areas of the Leased _premises is less than the maximum allowance for such areas, Landlord agrees to 4,,radit such savings to such other areas of the Leased ` Premises or items as Tenant shall request CONFERVICE ROOM Landlord shall provida building ding rn conference r on the 7th floor which shall be available to t4nai is at no charge. The plans and specificati0ne for the conference room shall be subject to the approval, of Direct, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. ' LEASE TERM: ?rim date of "Ber. p cy" (defined below) through March 311 1996. RENT SCHEDUM: " en€ Date" Beginning on tie ',Rant �cencam (defined below) and throughout the entire Lease. Term, Direct D ect would pay Landlord $l3w �� tri��, ie tirsf/yr as r ��s� Rent b' TZNANT' S ? OPORT ONAT SHARg OP OPEAATINd EXPENSES: Based upon 78/279 rot. in the Leased P're *mass (out of 125,560 rsf total) , DLreot' s proportionate share of the o: e a t .hg expenses would be 62.37%. OPERATING Larittlord re +re8ents that the average EXPt $ES : annual operating expenses for the property are $4.00/raf. sn addition t� "Bag* 90 04/30 14:37 V503-293-9409 PIS OFFER Or SPACE AND EXCLUSIVITY OF NEGOTIATION: Upon the execution hereof the parties' hereto agree that: (i) the 'general terms and conditions stated herein 014411 remain in of feCt throughout their negotiations and until at least April 27, 1990 (the "Negotiation. Period "" ) , (ii) they will negotiate, in good faith, exolusiv`eiy with each other for the purpose of entering into a Lease for the Leased premises; (iii) iaridl.ord; w 1 not permit the Leased Premises to koe leased by any third party during the Negotiation period; and (iv) Upon any inquirY from any other . poor peo Lvs tenant, Landlord will advise such party that the leased PremisE9 is ctrrertly Under o Lion If the parties have hot entered into an agreement by the end of the Neqotiation Period, as May be extended by muttaal agreement, then eaOh party shall he released from ataY and all t bli5at,ions hereunder and Landlord shall he freer to offer the Leased premises in the zar'ketplece. If you are agreeable to the foreg+ing Please your agreement +� �.y�Yp. �:.y.. �.y r both co Pies of, this letter and retu in i3 a�J4��Ah�di �! �� W��di�y�fii� Rap' 4�.� W� �i one to me at your earliest convenience Sincerely, U S WEST Direct By: Michael ' r ': essman Director - Finance operatione/1eal` Estate Agreed: Lincoln Cent er Phew V Limited Partn.et'Ohip cfr v tieavar ton, no aerlera l Partner arial • 'b ' 90 04/30 14 38 '&503.-293-9409 U 2 WIMP olaekslig1. liortr uweee' it up, tn�, Ulna f4xt WeMrkl Avanue, Sot% NO ianVitt. C��bi�orrsdb StAttti �WOV lbnye Kim Ser+IQt Coon April 11, 1990 ,[x', Paul V r °os kbaz k Project Director T ammell Crow Company 102G0 6.w- Grannb r9 Rd - Portland, , OR 97223 Don Ekman, Esq. Bul.i ant, Houser, bailey Pender 'rast & Haman 1211 sW 5th AVnnue, Suite igoo +rortland, OR 97204 f RAMMELL PDX rri.r MARKETING FIESt1llFia'ES Gex tl eMen This shall aohfitm out wh rein ! advised you that due to the roof t conCerhs expressed U WEST Di `ec t s potential move out of P' , tl,a,n' d1 . O the suburbs, U by the City of Portland s cLvic and political comM i Ei10+ut 6 WEST Oirect hab determined thAt 4,t e' right y • ntaf 1 9Qt1atQ h L er t P . ?tnertl ip rot th4 purpose of eritetitiq Into e► Lealsa at Fiy retoree as we discus edt nt gotiationn under w 1990 are her ?bye termihat d. VtrY 'truly yours, Tohya Ins 14013_ iA e4A, pesc‘me THE LINCOLN BUILDING LINCOLN EIGHT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 S` BASIC MATERIALS: Project Team List 2 Application with Authorized Signature • Title Transfer Instrument Assessor's Map Site Plans Applicant's Statement (Project Description) a, Development Schedule b• Materials Description c. Specific Materials - Application Checklist Variance Requests and Narratives Construction Budget Exhibit List Transportation Analysis PROJECT TEAM OWNER/APPLICANT, LIncoln Eight Limited Partnership 10250 S.W. Greenburg Road, Suite 300 Portland, Oregon 97223 Contact: David. Blake ARCHITECT Ingrim/Mills/Martindale, P.C. 10200 S.W. Greenburg Road, Suite 200 Portland, Oregon 97223 Contact: Bart Mills STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS: KPFF Consulting Engineers 421 S.W. Sixth Avenue Portland, Oregon 97204 ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERS: Dames and Moore 1220 S.W. Morrison Portland, Oregon 97201 LANDSCAPE ,CONSULTANT: Northwest Landscape Industries, Inc. 4 o Crr CITY OF TOG REDO SITE . DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tiard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639 -4171 1. GENERAL INFORMATION PROPERTY ADDRESS /LOCATION_ O 50 5 W, Creenburg Road T'7 a j fYP CIG 97 r% TAX MAP AND Tom: LOT NO. 1 s 135AB , Lot ,' 1000 FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO. OTHER CASE NO'S: RECEIPT NO. APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: DATE: Application elements submitted (A) Application form (1) (B) Owner's signature /written authorization (C) Title transfer instrument (1)' SITES IZE A. � ss�re.s (D) Assessor' map (1) PROPERTY OWNER /DEED HOLDER* Lincoln Ei trht Ltd. Partne ship' . (E) Plot plan (pre -app checklist; ADDRESS LL0260 245.9400 (F) Applicant's s Srateuent CITY Tigard, gard, OR ZIP' 4777 (pre -app checklist) (G) List of property Qwne 'rs and APPLICANT* ADDRESS CITY • • • • SRm ,imited 'Partnershi PHONE ZIP *When the owner, and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of, record or a leasee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of 'the owner with written authorization. The owners) must sa gn this application in ''the space provided on page ,two or Submit a written authorization with this 'application.:' Z. PROPOSAL StThINARY The owners of record of the subject property request site development review approval to. allocl _elan. c1 ttJtrtitin' rif st 'v e bu ,l_clirg. 0524P/13P Rev'd 5/87 addresses within 250 feet (1) (H) Filing fee ( ) (I) Construction Cost Estimate DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE FINAL 'DECISION DEADLJNE: COMP._PLAN/ZONE DESIGNATION: N.M. Number Appvoval Date Final Approval Date: Planning Engineering . List any variance, conditional use, sensitive lands, or other land use actions to be considered as part of this application: Height variance anr? n�a -l- incr ctPT 1 "Pri Pnr'p • Applicants To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. 4 THE APPLICANT (S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of lim' i. the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments,' and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. bATE)) this day of E ptamb r SIGNATURES of each owner (eg,. husband and wife) of the subject property- (KSL c pm /O524P) `a7 11 q�p !l: .ARRA €TY DEED Li «. Granted and recorded to correct scrivener's error in misidentification of grantee in warranty deed dated the 27th day of June, 1990, Recorder's Fee No 90- 34484, recorded June 27, 1990. New West federal Savings and Loan Association, Grantor, conveys and warrants to Lincoln Eight Limited Partnership, Grantee, the following described real property free of encumbrances except as specifically set forth herein situated in Washington County, Oregon, to wit: See Exhibit "A." The said property is free from encumbrances except those exceptions set forth on Exhibit "B attached hereto and incorporated by this ;,reference The true consideration for this conveyance is $2,800,000.00, together with other good and valuable considerations Until a change is requested, all tax statements shall be sent to the following address: Lincoln Eight Limited Partnership, 10260 S.W. Greenburg Road, Portland, Oregon 97223, THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS, BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, TWE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT :._ TO VERIFY APPROVED USES Dated this �t-'_ of , 1990, New West Federal Savings and Loan Association "B y s �J i STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. County of San Joaquin ) .1, Its: r 2ffiwyelts. joir?", Sep. PeLrs ©ry 11 appeared the above named ,� Anthony bnri vice xe den New West F ederal Savings and Loan As _ Association, and acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be its voluntary 1990 a 1 OFFICIAL, SEAL SE i ' ROSAUE Vi PHELPS . NOTARY PUBLIC • CALIFORNIA ' t,, J SAN JJOAQUIN cC: ut, rf' 'x My Comm Expirfr Oct. 7, 1991 08/13/9b 288!PpbJE Rev .2 4.404 1. Not ry Public for California' My Conics i is s i oI EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF, THE REAL PROPERTY The land referred to in thin Agreement ie situated in the State Of Oregon, county of Washington and is described as follows A tract of land being part of Block 9, all of Blocks 10 and 11, Part of Blocks 12, 13 and 14, also that part of vacated S.W. Maple Leaf Street and vacated S.W. Hayes, S.W. Garfield and s .'W. Grant, TOWN OF METZGER, 'i..n the Nort east one '-quarter and Northwest one-quarter of Section 35, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, 'Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon, more particularly' described as follows: BELINNING at Block 11, TOWN OF . the Northwest corner of TZGER., a duly recorded plat said Northwest corner bel,Inr', the intersection of the: South line of S.W. Locust Street and the East line of Greenberg Road; thence North 89 degrees 30' East along the North and the east line aloof rg road; North 89 degrees 30' East g. Greenhu�. road thence N the North line of Block 11, 10 and 9 (along the South line of S.W. Locust Street) , a distance of 406.50 feet to a point on the North line of Block 9; thence South 0 degrees 30' East 369.00 feet; thence on a curve to the right 114.86 feet having a radius of 112.00 feet of which the long chord bears South 28 degrees 52' 46" West 109.85 feet to a point of compound curve; thence on a curve to the right 149.88 feet having a radius of 134.68 feet of which the long chord bears North 89 degrees 50' 25" %lest; 1.42.26 feet; thence North 57 degrees 56' 21" West 58.48 feet to a point of non- tangent curve; thence on a curve g g a radius of 45.00 feet to the right 1.4 % . the long 141.37 chord 57 degrees 56' 21" of which �3 West 74.99 feet, thence on a curve to the left 73.82 feet having ,a radius of 129.90 feet of which the long hord bears 74 degrees 13' 11" West 72.83 feet; thence :;Mouth 89 degrees 30' West 41.79 feet to a point on the East line of GreenbUrg road; thence North 14 degrees 14' East 336„18 feet; to the point of beginning. EXCEPT that part of Lots 1, 2 , 3 , 4, 5 and 6, Block 11, and part of Lots'. 3 40 5 and 60 Block 121 taken for street widening (Greenhurg Road) Washington C.t itnty' `Book of Records Docu.tent 78- .50827 16 N EXHIBIT B • Taxes or assessments. which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real'praperty or by the public record;'proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which' would be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. Easements, or claims of easement, not shown by the public records, reservations or exceptions in patents or in acts authorizing the issuance rights, water. once thereof , water ri gh 4s , c 1 a7 ms ar title to Any lien, or right to a lien, labor ` for services, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. Discrepancies, conflict- in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose. ] 994, -91 taxes, a lien in an amount to be determined, but not yet ►, payable • City liens, if any, of the City of Tigard. • Regulations, including the power to acquire rights of ways and easements, of the Unified Sewerage Agency • An easement created by instrument, including the terms and Provisions thereof, Dated November 27, 1978 Recorded November,29, 1978 Recorder's Fee No. 78052367 In favor of Northwest Natural Gas Company, an Oregon core For Pipeline and appurtenances Location Over the Southerly portion 1Q: Easements for existing public utilities in vacated street area e r . r i p sed by said Order rued s imposed o reserved b� Order No 7d 232 and the condition No. 78, -232; Dated October 7, 1978' Recorded January 2, 1979 Recorder's Fee No. 79000127 p9/2 (=4O 4gdwppMC.w s -, 11. An easement created by instrument, including the terms and Provisions thereof, Dated November 7, 1978 Recorded November 27, 1978 Recorder-'s Fee No. 78051783 In favor of Unified Sewerage Agency of Washington County For Sewer Location : Over the Southerly portion 12. An easement created by instrument, including the terms and provisions thereof, Dated September 10, 1979 Recorded September 11, 1979 Recorder's Fee No. : 79037015 In favor `of The County of Washington For Traffic control facilities Location Over the Southeasterly portion 13. Covenants, conditions, restrictions and easements, including the terms and provisions thereof, as contained in Memorandum of Real Estate Agreement, 2 Dated � November , 1979 Recorded November 7, 1979 Recorder's Fee No. 79045910 Amendment, Dated December 30, 1982 Recorded December 30, 1982 Recorder's Fee No 82034219 14. ;Ordinance 90 -07, including the terms and provisions thereof, Recorded April 18, 1990 Recorder's Fee No, 90 -18982 Affects Adopting The President's Parkway Development Plan, b5/25/ b 48 WPPMcW e "' r . k► SEE MAP IS 1 355A. r�r 50' 1 Sc' W. BIGI ,CR. 7'53.. 60, 1000 4.32 AC: 9r'35 - 1- 4 2 I 111.50 ;..i. t.t (;) i' 1.65 I ` r C- 24 1376o If, a 67.80 50 J 1 �Or 30' 100,55 6 114.10 '7.25 1 56 4s4 31003 564AC 60,40 cv, 1% 3.56 S 116.7o 6 129 ►35 14 3' 8 12 15C, 15 aJo et-16 too to ur �cw 60,50 1006 ti d en' AC 100w 4- 1 'J. 50 5U 50 50 900 327 113 1.67,4 c, 0 1 3 1 " rJry tv X 1 2 21 11 I 10 50 L– 50 4- 50 �-' S0 _ � _ 5P 4 Fo VACA7,Et) 6 /0 19M 127 44 5C` -1 Ir JM 0 4 %/ Nd i ts� 12' la 12 01 'a. it, I 5 [", -.. 14 9,88,....,,---<-1 1..s.4 j 9r.1' Rt,I;3H.6C �.a1, 1 o' sir• cr *..1. 10 6 11I c c. p. 11 i l li l 7,04 ill O°M' 4 et I .ob. to ;1 10 to Ir. �.` ,1 w 400 :7%4. 1 t. »:. j - 3 2J .'1C -1,- u` j 6 .i ;•. '1 I 9 1f. 6 9 1 %ai. tfY �r I I 100 1 '2-" Lt IGC7 100 _. 60 Vt.CA'TEg- 80-21653 10 I 100 1.0 6G 1" 50 N q1 M 126 31 7 8 1 1002 1, 7TAc, 50 0 I — 12 l0 81 VACATED R/0 `113 2 ^`1'' S0 50 r.6" �•�a 6o 3�.~sBoo A�r 1 81 1004 _' 1 3.2/ Ac. -- - _ 4 21. 169 O. 76.05 I. 12 N f 9 r30` 57'1 26011 Y'1 _ _ tp 212 7.". , 10 IC,s. 2:!,,C27) 1-2) 1761 C, Ca,l u 6 9 0 $! 100 264 56 1:00 t. ., 7. Ind i lao r 4.22 CN5. ) PROJECT SUMMARY Lincoln Eight Limited Partnership proposes to construct a seven story, 140,000 square foot office building, and a three level parking garage to be located adjacent to the existing Lincoln Center Buildings, to the east of Washington Square. The proposed building will be sited within an existing parking lot directly west of the existing Lincoln Building, and is bordered on the north by Locust Street, north and west exa i ust �a of Mapleleaf Street, north of One Lincoln Center, and west of Greerthurg Road. As the subject building displaces existing parking, there is a proposed three level parking garage to the north of the building. A. 1Develcmpv►ejt Sehedule Construction of the proposed naidrise building is anticipated to begin in March 1991 with completion expected by November 1991. Materials Description The building will be a post; tensioned concrete structure clad in brick panels of similar color, and common materials of the surrounding Lincoln Center Buildings. The window system will be solar gray glazing set in anodized aluminum frames, similar to systems currently employed on Lincoln Tower and Lincoln Five. The accompanying parking garage will be of concrete in structure with brick infill panels, similar to the existing parking garage supporting Lincoln Tower and Lincoln Five. 0 SPECIFIC IVIATERIA LS: Application Checklist A. SITE INFORMATION (IS copies) 1. Vicinity Map - A vicinity map has been provided as part of submitted Exhibit a, referenced Large Scale Drawings (per Section 18.102 of development Code). 2. Site Size and Dimensions - Reference to Exhibit C Drawing will define site and proposed building. 3, Site Features Reference to Exhibit C Drawing will define site and proposed building. 4. Location of Existing Structures and Their Use - On the immediate existing properties, there have been constructed three midrise structures, one highrise structure, one lowrise structure and three parking garages. All adjacent buildings to the east and south of the proposed project are commercial buildings. To the north and west of the proposed project are smaller commercial buildings and retail structures. Reference to Exhibit A for a complete profile of existing immediate uses. The zoning surrounding the site is as follows: North, South, ' C -P, East, C -P, West, C -G. See Exhibit A. Location of Existing Utilities and Easements 1. Refer to Exhibit A. 2. Recorded Easements Noted As: Unified Sewage Agency, #78051783, 11/27/78 Northwest Natural Gas, #78052367, 11/30/78 Ingress//Egress, #7845910, 11/7/74' Amended #82.034219, 12/30/82 Amended #87049414, 9/29/87 Reciprocal Easement, #86026101 1/18/86 er Location of Existing Dedicated Right -Of -Ways 1. Standard conditions as subject to rights of the public in streets, roads, and highways. No other such dedications were found in the Title reviews. A • • SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS (15 copies) • Proposed Site and Surrounding Properties: Refer to Assessor's maps, Exhibit B, included herein, and Exhibit C of this submission for a graphic overview of proposed site. • Location, Dimensions and Names of all: Existing and platted streets and other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining properties: Refer to Exhibit A as submitted. . Refer to Exhibit A for location and dimensions of: a. Entrances and exits on site b. Parking and circulation areas - s area services c. Loading and ds d. Pedestrian and bicycle circulation e. Outdoor common areas f. Above- ground utilities • Refer to Exhibit A for location, dimensions and setbacks of: a. Existing Permanent Structures b. Proposed structures S. Storm Drainage Facilities (Submitted . Separately) 6. Sanitary Sewer Facilities - (Submitted Separately) 7 • Areas to be Landscaped - Reference to Exhibit F Drawing. 8. Location and Type of Outdoor Lighting (Submitted Separately) ▪ Mailbox Location T.A. 10. Location of All Structures and Their Orientation -Refer to Exhibit Drawing A and C for a graphic representation of all existing and buildings proposed ro din s on" the site with their orientation (per Section P P � g 18.64 of Development !Code). ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS (6 copies) • Exhibit D. .. to Reference 1. Floor Plans (with Square P'ootages) Refer n Drawing Reference to Exhibit E Drawing. 2. Building Elevations - �. • aE. LANDSCAPE PLAN (15 copies) 1. Irrigation Plan (Submitted Separately) 2. Description of fences, buffers & screenings - Reference to Exhibit F Drawing. 3. ` Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials. Reference to Exhibit F Drawing. 4. Erosion Control Narrative (Submitted Separately) SIGN DRAWINGS (Submitted Separately) G. TRAFFIC e REPORT ( 8 copies) ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE Height Variance ance 1. The Request 2. Supporting Narrative ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE APPLICATION - Parking Size Variance L The Request 2, Supporting Narrative REQUEST FOR AN ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE TO THE HEIGHT CODE Request of an administrative variance to the height limitations Development Codes). Summary of Condition and Reason for Request: Lincoln Center consists currently of six buildings: Lincoln 1, 2, and 3 buildings are midrise structures of 5 and 6 stories ascending to heights of 15 feet to 80 feet. Lincoln 4, a highrise structure of 12 stories ascends to a height from grade to top of parapet approximately 153 feet, Lincoln 5 is a 7 story highrise ascending to a height of 92 feet and the Lincoln Building, a three story building ascending to a height of 44 feet. Pursuant to Chapter 18.98, Section 18.98.020 of the Development Code, it states that "Any building located in a non- residential zone may be built to a maximum height of 75 feet; provided g 1-1/2 the area of 1. The total floor area of the building does not exceed.. 1 to the site; The yard dimensions in each case are equal to at least 1/2 of the building height of the principal structure; The structure is not abutting a residential zoning district. g proposed building i .ve Office The current zoning of the ro Deco i�uildin site is C-P Profe�sional/Admin.istr rte C-P and District. The extent in the majority of existing surrounding zone are (General Commercial District). Within designated (Chapter Development Code, i Section the C -P deli nated zone Cha ter 8.64 of the develop , - . 4, "except in provided v �� Chapter 18.98, no building in 1.�i64 Ci50 Subsection 4 exec t as otherwise in Ch the C -P zoning district . shall exceed 45 feet in height . It is our intent that it be shown that special and unusual circumstances related to the subject site, the literal interpretation of the provisions of the applicable zone would cause an undue or unnecessary hardship to hold the owner from the full development potential of his property (per ORD. 89 -06; ORD. 83 -52) granting i , height variance to 92 feet for the proposed building, The , anon of a he i : d1n will allow like use pursuant to existing adjacent buildings as described above. By height gr � proposed g • nee it is not going materially detrimental to r granting the Deed h.ei ht �varia with ng to mat i�e comprehensive plan, purpose Chapter p : conflict with th e the u ose of Cha tart 1.8 nor be in conflic the policies, of t p or to any other applicable policies and standards, or to other properties in the same zoning or vicinity. By granting this height variance, it will allow parody with existing structures displaying similar heights. The variance will not single out a singular property, but will rather allow The Lincoln Building to experience the same qualities, densities, and heights as the rest of Lincoln Center, where the average height of the existing 6 buildings is 97 feet from grade to the top of the parapet. The granting of the requested variance is the minimum variance necessary to effect the desired and required architectural fabric of the surrounding area. There exists in addition an established precedence with the overall site, and is consistent with other such requests. Lastly, by granting the proposed variance, the resultant use will be the same as permitted under this Title and City Standards and will be maintained to the greatest extent that is y possible, , , permitting g the land. reasonahl ossihle while erxb.xttin some economic use of In conclusion, the hardship is not self - imposed, and the "variance'' requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. Q.. e• REQUEST FOR AN ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE TO THE COMPACT PARKING SIZE Request uest of an administrative variance to the size of compact parking spaces. the existing phases of Lincoln Center shows that operation of g P Previous experience in the p Previou xP in the size of compact spaces allows an efficient site design both in terms of function of the P parking facility and in the availability adequate area for landscaping. The continuation of this design will p rovide an appropriate number of spaces while maintaining an acceptable overall parking facility. Section 18.134.050 City 050 of the Ci Development Code provides several criteria which must be met by a proposed variance site development proposal must be viewed as an integrated design for a veto ,: . t�, de total si The u P � Generally, it is g purposed and Plan policies. thorough evaluation with respect to Code ur P the Development Code to provide for office the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and t uses in an environment conducive to business, as well as compatible with adjacent areas. with respect to the parking design is the result of a complex analysis The decision wi h P P . establish a high quality project g q ty many factors. �t is the overall intent of this ro ect to purpose Y g9 of the i , compatible its surroundings, which is also the ur ose environment, com atible with development code. variance to the City's compact parking space size will allow the The proposed of the design standards established by the first five phases of Lincoln Center, continuation g y ases n er, pp County zoning. This proposal, and which would be allowed under , the d is necessary to allow the applicable oun zo s Criteria design standard �' therefore, explicitly .meet riterxa � since comparable with the earlier phases, sixth phase to he completed in a manner p . � � allowed by the CP zone. associated parking are allo ne. The p P as consistent with the existing development g � c P g mint of the first five The proposed office building and onsi with g P / intensity of the development i hens project zone, P well phases of the ro ect as � en as with the CP The proposed ro �osed P arking design criteria have functioned adequately on the existing five phases of Lincoln Center, enter and no o a d d se effects on adjacent properties have been identified. An ins p ection of the existing parking area shown that it is aesthetically pleasing and functionally appropriate, thereby indicating that its continuation meets Criteria 4 of Section 18,134050 of th e City Development Code, y case is specifically related to the ability of this site to be developed in manner in this c e with adjacent properties, while providing adequate parking in commensurate n No personal circumstances are cited as the basis for the hardship, and landscaping. F 1 TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY / DAVID BLAKE INGRIM/ MILLC /MAP1'INDAL E ARCHITECTS BAUCH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY BUDGET ESTIMATE t° i i e L-CenterA.wks 10, 1. 1 AUGUST 9 rr(_a SITE PREPARATION Layout Site Clr arir►D1'Aphait Removal' Mass C1 t avat ion—Bid Mass Excavation -Site Stuctur'a.i Fi I I Grading Demo Existing Building 2 SITE UTILITIES` Water Service Fire service Storm Sewer" ReIoca'te MH's/cE:'s 8a:t kf Io+w Valve/Vault Site L fight i rig /P'ow'er; SITE DEVELOPMENT, Sidewalks Entry SI abe Extruded Curbs, Aspha I t AC/ - "R' ck) Pavement Mark: i n;Js FOOYILATII:N2 AND.. `1'UGS'T511t 'r.w,t ***Note: THIS ESTIMATE REFLECTS A FIVE STOR v BUILDING 91630 SF TOTAL * *1ST Floor 13' _4on , **12.67 feet floor tn' floor** QUANTITY 14 cr-,d 712t() sf 1528 bcy lii0 bcy 1534 tocy '(i61:,, sf 3750 c 'Subtotal 40 If 40 lt" .0 I f 11 ea i Is 34615 Subtotal Sub wf UNIT .,i_DG COST/BLDG SF PRICE T=ATAL. (91360 SF $6t_t0.00 $11.10 $6.00 a $8 , 00 $0.10 $4,C)0 $7,000 $7,124 1j$6,660 $12.1. +, •2 $5,062 $16,000 $62 286 $0, '8 r $720 2( I �l8 lyr f 4 0 \\ 0 S;: O $37.40 $1,496 $124000.00 $121000 (-0 $0.15 $6,192 rt $0.01 $0.0i $0.02 $0.06 $0.1 �;.. 7,�rs $0.28 r:.•,..1 y r r�r *4, 760 1 9 TRAMMELL CROW COtt'l 'ANY / DAVID BLAKE INGRIM /MILLS /I1 RTINDA1.E ARCHITECTS BAUGH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY BUDGET ESTIMATE f i le L- Geriter-Awbs ***Motet THIS ESTIMATE _ REFLECTS A FIVE ETt=iPY BUILDING 91630 SF TOTAL **1ST Floor 13' -4"** AUGUST 10, 1990 **12.67 feet ,floor to f l o ,r ** Grade Beams Structural _ e)'crr.vat i nr, Elevator pit walls Slab 011 Grade 5 ELEVATED STRUCTURE Buildirt "8: Cc l urnns 'For °rn and pc'ur Columns: rebar tear~ Nal1sgt`c'rn' and pour Shear Wal I s :r-ebar Elevated u l abs: form and pour Elevated slabs : r -ebar» Elevated slabs: P.T. Elevated beamsr e"ar Elevated bems: P.T: Elevator m a c h i rr e slab,' Penthouse roof structure Penthouse wall structure Emb'edded N i sc , Iron E q u i p rn e rr 't H' :Istif"fo Reba- Des i 8rt C h u ff rr5encY Partial Mechanical -Screen Vaulted Roof Structure Concrete HVA'_ Curbs QUANTITY 60 cy 8 �'� sf Lr,ti 18260 st Subtotal 213:', If 2184 If f99A sf 7 998 sf 91180 sf 91180 91180 e " 91180 ,f ,L 50 ,. P '8t;)t:)' sf 720 s f 1640 sf 91.180 sT 10 c'/ 1 Is '? It 41.ir'v sf 1 _U sF r_ UNIT h,LDG CJ:IET/BLuG GF.. "PRICE T0TA1w ('j:._.tu -GF) $'.7'.30..-00. ...$19i.800..."'„' '$0 . (��!$f'1. t_)13 $�y�5'T2.5 uy c'', t "ir ' -$1-...85,... $.1.t q r16 $t„i . $ $84.24 $8,36 $12.06 $1.44 $ .- $0.46 $0.4L. $u.4 $0.48 $6,00 $5.00 $4.00 $0.15 $215.00 $80,0009.inj $0.00 $7.75 $8,00 1)00 gat ter}.. 5th $185 211 $73,000 $96,456 $11,517 $4'='1. j 4L0 ��.1 $41,194; $43,766 $38,29(!.', . $43,766 $1,800 $ : ^) ! .'400 $6,480 $13,677 $2,150 $80, 000 $t $0.20 I PFF Y 22.00/ $1.01', 3 F F : 3,80/E $5.27 $0,46 KPFF: 1,40/E $0.481' KPFF: 0.4 #/ $0,42 KPFF: /,„ r J $0.48 Kf FF� M o .. 4 SF $0.02 $0.04 t_)4 $0.07 $0.02 $0.88 $0.00 $0.04 $0.15 $0.05+ Si '' ' 70 TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY / DAVID BLAKE INGRIM/I lILL3 /1Ai TINDA,l_E ARCHITECT ** *Not BAUGH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY BUDGET ESTIMATE file L-CenterA.wf s AUGUST is ?, 1990 Floors' 1).:,•5: A. urn I glum Entry Doors Strip Windows ;t -; " High Spandrel Glass Curtain Wall LIP Brick @ 1st Floor Brick Panels Brick Column Cladding penthouse walls (metal) Brick suppor. t embed angles diagonal i uptprtrts -1_1 t , c Exterior nitI stud. framing:, * .P" Metal Studs W/o Rock Hollow Metal Doors Exterior Caa 11. i rt; Roof Hatch t? Stair Sheetm a i Column Crtvct s THERMAL AID MOISTURE PROTECTION Single 'p I y' roofing over R19 Fl a,sii t n; /ctryUt•t t t=r1f l ash 1 rtg Brick Sealer (LIP) Roof Parapet c..,arpciitr "y' Wall Insulation F {.br esaf1r ;;3 at prer'1meter Vail I ��r i Sheetrreta j' THIS ESTIMATE REFLECTS A FIVE. "Ti IRYY BUILDING 91630 SF TOTAL **1ST Floor 1$' _4it.s **12.67 feet floor to floor** UNIT _ BLDG` COST/BLDG SF QUANTITY PRICE TOTAL (9'1360 SF) 2 Pr- 111462. sf 39AR sf 340 sf °;afar sf 105 20 sf 9lvpt,) sf 1620 sil+ $3,500.00 $71000 $0.0R $14.00 $25R146R $2.,-1.;, s17,00 $67,456 $0.7 19.00 $ A MM+++ , r':t t t $0.72 $1.2.00 ... $+1 wt, J Il_tt $0.39 Si. 5 „ 15(_1 $163,060 $1.78 $17.00 $16,830 $0.18 $4.00 $6,4R0 $0.07 2800 I ' ' $4,00 $ 1 1., a 0 t •} $0.12 850 ea $15,('1(1 ct1=, .7.7.,n $0,1)6 1 _2670 t „1 s f $1.00 $ 1 t.1 r t} $0.14 1 ea $500,0t) $500 $0.01 4220 I f $1.75 $7, :3!--,.:,,5 $0.0S 1 ea $2,500.00 $; 21500 $0.03 5 e,. $150.00 $3, 50 $0,04 Subtotal • 18281'r s f 1122 If 29615 S'f • 1,1_:15t,ri s f 8u ..1 : tit Sri+' 1 $66:3,67'9 ? 1 .:. 6 '=t SO $ 0 .07 1041)1_ s() t:4 .s7 it TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY / DAVID BLAKE: INGRIM /MILLO /MAR,TINDALE ARCHITECTS BAUGH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY BUDGET ESTIMATE file L- Genter'A.wks'' AUGUST 10, 1990 Fi lo1_Ir• i r,3 (Mar k l e -Th i reset) Flooring, (Carpet) Cei "irr3 (Gyp Board) Interior storefrontil doors Corridor wa(is Lobby Walls Wood Trim/Paneling Allowance F'a'int walls/cell „irr3s Fi r-edoor-s Errtry Na I koff Mats Handrail V Wall Stair Handra i i Lobby Stairway Fountain Al I owanc e Second F l o+ r° I oI bl b y Fl oor i rlg (Mark I e /Carpet) Ce i 1 j rr (GYP Board) Irrter i 0r" Storefront Doors Corridor Malls 'Lobby W a l l s Wood ,Tr fm/Parre I I rir A l l owarlce Paint Ma. l I s /C, e i i i n 3 5 E l evat r- Lobby Floor :3 r; F r i rrg (Mart) I e /Carpet) Wood Tr i rn /F'arre I i no A1,1 owa is e i nt Wal I s Gypsum Etc a.rd C;e I'1 i nos Shaft 1- Corr i d r. Wa 1 l s IRestr-'crn Neal l s 1 F Restr !hcm CYe i l r rC' s I. I1 L `l ec u4Mech Ror.tm War is Ty p 1 a' ',x: c l urn r r r 1 r- r� w Teti;arrt Grid ) i t e s v r" :I itt Ti I c i s 1 W 1 Restr��;l +rn (Car pe ) Re".Ytr- :c,m 1art, t e Thr-,450 a y i '7. nd 66. * * *Note: THIS ESTIMATE: REFLECTS A FI'JE STOR•YU BUILDING ::1630 SF TOTAL **1ST Floor 18, -411* * •. *1z.67 feet floor- to floor* QUANTITY UNIT BLDG COST/BLDG SF PRICE TOTAL (,.11 ,-,r_;; F) $14,220 $0.16 $ta er=r.cu $131992 $0.15 ~ F, WF0 $0.06 $10,127 $0.11 $81685 $0.09 $1F,000 $0.16 $3,154 1F4 $0.03 3 $1,250 $05.01 $ 1 9 7 {... $0.02 $1,980 Y '• �r,7 . tai,. $7,200 $0.0 $F.,000 $0.05 $401000 $0.44 44 94; =; sf $15.00 NIC '$0.00 149' =' s $4.00 pr $11750.00 492 sf $2.90 2866 sf $3.25 1 I s $15,000.00 4( 1 pr $1,250.00 144 sf $12.00 68 I f $30.00 96 I f $75�. r;ta 1 fit $F , 000.00 1 I s $40, 000.00 NIC r„ 2 /J s 1 : a a. 2160 sf l 1972 s7 1 Is .520 sf NIC 1 Is 141311. s f NI C• 22995 s sf,. 0.00 $4.00 $1,751:1.00 $2.90 $3.25 0/000.00 $0.40 $5.00 • , ,74'r i :34 a. $0.00 $0.04 $0.07 $0.07 $0.05 $0.02 $0.82 $0.00 $0.04 o 1l� O TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY / DAVID BLAKE INGF;IM /MILLS/MARTINDML= ARCHITECT' * *••N o t e . THIS ESTIMATE REFLECTS A FIVE STORYY LAUGH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY BUILDING 91630 SF TOTAL BUDGET ESTIMATE f il e L- CenterA .wks **1ST Floor 13' -4"** AUGUST 1a ; 1990 **12.67 feet floor to f I oo"*' • UNIT BLDG COST/BLDG SF QUANTITY PRICE TOTAL (91360 SF) - - - -- Restroom Ti Ti I e W�t Wall (9') 11140 sf $6.00 $6,840 $0.07 Restroom Si dewai I T i l e Returns 400 sf $4.50 $1,800 $0.02 Paint concrete 'stair walls 96 30 sf $0.30 $',;189 $0.03 Paint interior walls 2A686 sf $0,30 $8,006 $0.09 Paint stairs /rails 10 ea $200.00 $0.0 Interior doors: ea $55 .00 $15,540 $0.17 Rstr "��,��rglLlt I its _ -• Stairway doors 10 ea $600.00 $6,000 $0.07 SPECIALTIES To -i Iet partiti! :rns TF' dispensers Paper Itowe l 41 Nen'ser Napkin D i s p e n s e r Napkin D i spOsaI Si:ap Di pe iser Grab ears M i r-r-,_,r=: Fire El;t I rrgu i shers Si;3na; er'Dir ectory (Al ' Iowtryce) Mai Ibut,es (A I I wance) 3 VERTICAL TRANSPORTATION Elva :'rs 200g _v r;aar ar�J Fa.Is 8ubtota I $41x,117 $4.57 2l-.1 e a: $3F(0.00 $81750 $0.10 20 ea $5:40.00 $1,000 $0.01 10 PI $75.00 $750 $0.01 S ea $ 15.00 $62,5 $0.01 15a {' $0.01 10 ea $25.00 $250 $0.00 20 ea $75.00 $1,500 $0.02 420 sf $6.00 $2,520 $0.08 10 e $125.00 $11250 $0.01 1' :. I s $4,000,00 $4,000 $0.04 I At $1,500.00 $ 1, 500 $0.0 +2 Ir Subtotal $•r'' r 670 $0.25 top $13 K ocO a 0q_1 4b TRAt MELL CROW CuMr'ANY / DAVID BLAKE INGRIM/ 'i,CLLG/MARTINUAI.E ARCHITECTS eAUGH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY BUDGET 'ESTIMATE file L- Center"A,w1: s AUGUST 10 1990 ** *Note. THIS ESTIMATE REFLECTS A FIVE GT,HF,YY BUILDING 91630 SF TOTAL *41ST Floor 1: ' -4"** **12.67 feet floor o o c _ '_ __- _- =�,,-__ -_ _.. _- __ - -- - - U�CITr k�Li�G ^Ci:aST/ BLDG OF QUANTITY PRICE TrTAL (VI:.,;J) ofl Plumbing and HVAC (praci•::age RTU' s) 91 860 sf $5.45 $497,912 $5.45 Fire Protection ELECTRICAL Fr_rwer and lighting Fire Alarm Nf Fu,i i I►.•rrii atirwr s': Subtotal 91360 s'f 1 Is Subtota GUEITi iTA'_ AREAS 1 THROUGH /2 JOBSITE GEM'(_ CONDITIONS PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BBONO (NIC,) SUBTOTAL OVERHEAD AND FEE @ 3.5% LIABILITY INSURANCE Ti iTAL 'RFLT 111'�i1,n`{ ONSTRUCTIuiN iUDCCT $0 $0.R5 $77 y.. 6:,= -1,} $0.8 $2.6F. t0t4)0.00 $515 a 5168 $6.80 $3,528,770 1141.,151 6 c'91'9::1 44.E t" ,_,9 ,.,, ,, � r, «r '111'4 9Ft7 We expect this budget to be revised to 'r'eflect 'e $4O.00 /s.f. cost co' .structi.on. We are, therefore, submitting out Site Development on that calculation. for the building Review fee based •1 EXHIBIT A: EXHIBIT B EXHIBIT C: EXHIBIT D EXHIBIT B: EXHIBIT F EXHIBITS PRESENTED: DRAWINGS AND GRAPHICS EXISTING BUILDING SITE AND VICINITY MAP (Alta Survey) ASSESSOR'S MAP PROPOSED SITE PLAN PROPOSED TYPICAL FLOOR PLANS PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATIONS PROPOSED LANDSCAPING DRAWINGS 1/A 0RAC.- 1\ \ ```\ \\ �. S.W. TRA NSF OR TA TI ON ANAL YSIS FOR LINCOLN CENTER TIGARD, OREGON TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS LINCOLN CENTER DEVELOPMENT TIGARD, OREGON PREPARED FOR TPAMME1.1. CROW TIGARD j OREGON coNe may, ft ja0 RE is, RD NIA A k it , .. #41.- , ir PREPARED BY ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING, (ATEP) 4040 DOUGLAS WAY LAKE OSWEGO, OREGON 0-402 SEPTEMBER 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION REPORT METHODOLOGY .••••• •• . ••••• . • ••. •r ASSUMPTIONS o • • • • • s • • • . . • • • . • • • o • • o o • • • • • • r • • • s o • • • • • 3 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS ASSUMPTIONS . • • • • a • 4 ea • • 3 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS •. .,. • *ow ••.e•.•• •• '.o ea •. ••• 4 SCENARIO I — EXISTING CONDITIONS I • e a • . • •6 SITE CONDITIONS AND ADJACENT LAND USES • • . • a ea . , • 6 EXISTING R O A D W A Y S . • .... • . • .. . • . • we 6 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND OPERATIONS . ........• ..... 7 LEVELS OF SERVICE ...... • .. • .......' . • d • . ' . r • b •. ▪ 12 SCENARIO 2 - EXISTING + NEW BUILDING . • .... • • • . .. • a • • 17 TRIP GENERATION •.•• • . • •.• • ••.•• •• . TRIP DISTRIBUTION • • • . '. • • , .. LEVELS OF SERVICE...•...r•.• • •.••r.•.••. ••.•. 23 TRANSIT CONSIDERATIONS • ▪ • • • • • MITIGATINGMEASURESb••or• 6•o•.•.. • •n••.o•Y••.•••b. 25 CONCLUSIONS; , d • • • • • • e • o . • d • • d a • s • . • • • o s o • • d . . a • . • • • . Y . • . r 27 RECOMMENDATIONS• e ■ a d e • • • r . • • • • • a. • • • • s • r b o • • • C • a • • •... • • .. • • 28 TABLES 1. Trip Generation Comparison Existing Development • • • e . , 8 2, Levels of Service Definitions (Signalized Intersections) . • • . • .. • .. • .. 13 3• Criteria for Signalized Intersections • • e e • . • • • • M • • • • a • • • • • s • • • • 14 4. Level of Service Definitions (Unsignalized htersections) . , . • • • • 15 6 5 %5. Criteria for UUnsignalized Intersections • • • . . • • 1 9 • . . . Y • • • • . • • • • • q F. • • 16 . Existing of Service at Critical Intersections • • :Y. Y • . • p .Y s • • • . a:. •...• _�• • • 17. 7. Projected Trip Generation for Proposed Development . , .. • • . .. • . • . 19 8• Levels of Service at Critical Intersections . • • • Y . • . .. • 21 I ,I c f. FIGURES 1 . Vicinity Map . • • . • e 4 • . • . • o • . • c. . . • • r • • • • • .. • • 2 2• Study Impact Area • .•••.•.•••r• •••••. ego .••••••••• •.•,•. 10 3• Existing PM Peak Hour T r a f fi c Volumes 11 4. Proposed street network • . • 5. Lincoln Center Tenant Survey • • • .. ... . . • Y . ... 20 6. Site Distribution Percentage ........ • • .. . • 004 ... • • 22 Trips • . . . . . .. 23 � Site Generated Tai s PSI Peak Hour ...... •, 8. Total Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour .... a ..' ; • . 24 TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS OF LINCOLN CENTER DEVELOPMENT LOCATED IN TIGARD, OREGON This impact analysis has been conducted to identify and evaluate the existing and future traffic operational needs of the area known as Lincoln Center. The approximately 100 acre site is bounded on the north by Locust Street, on the east by Hall Boulevard, on the south by Highway 217, and on the west by the existing Lincoln Center development. Figure 1 shows the proposed development area The format used in this report was established during meetings with the City of Tigard, Washington County, and the applicants representatives. Specific traffic related issues discussed in this report includes Traffic analysis for the study area y Existing land use and traffic conditions in the project area Proposed land use and future traffic conditions in the project area Trip Generation estimates for the Lincoln Center property Site access locations and operations Safety considerations at the site access locations including, but not limited to sight distance analysis, turn lane and channelization needs Traffic impacts on surrounding streets This report was prepared using the latest land use and transportation data available from the City Tigard referred to as City), Metropolitan Service District (METRO), applicant, e i o ar d' (hereafter referr Washington County, and the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) SOCIATED► TRANSPORTATION! ENGINEERING PN ANNING TEP GE 1 LOCU5T AVE." NORTH. MAPL_ELEAF • 'r3 Evening p eak period turning movement traffic counts were conducted at the ` intersections adjacent to the Lincoln Center property and along key arterial in the area by ATEP and gleaned from those traffic reports conducted in the recent past. The evening peak hour was found to be from 4:30 to 5 :30 p.m. Upon review of these peak hour counts, the p.m. peak period was determined to be the most critical time in terms of traffic impacts at the intersections in the study area. The operating characteristics at each of the key signalized rand unsignalized intersections during the peak periods were examined using the methods outhned in the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual utilizing the Highway Capacity Manual Software. The operating characteristics examined included the average vehicle delay, volume to capacity (v /c) ratio, levels of service, and estimated queue length. The criteria used for the intersection analysis included the guidelines set forth by Washington County. These guidelines state that each signalized intersection analyzed should operate at a Levels of service (LOS) D with a volume to capacity (v /c) ratio of 0.95 or Tess. See tables 1 through 4. ASSUMPTIONS Access same pc�onts for the Lincoln Cren +��er site under existing and proposed zoning are the s�tme and traffic p atterns will be alike. Under existing zonin g, access to the site woul d continue to be Oak Street, et Hall Boulevard, rd, and Locust Street. These access points would likely be located at the existing street intersections. See Figure 3. p , will remain the same except for a revised major For additional development, access to the site will entrance to the site is proposed from Greenburg Road at the ` Aapleleaf intersection. See Figure 4. It is anticipated that the intersections of Locust and Greenburg ' Ro ad will i be signalized and p interconnected to the Mapleleaf intersection under the Lincoln V developments INTERSECTION ANALYSIS ASSUMPTIONS In order to analyze each intersection, there were certain common assumptions made. These assumptions, in general, are as follows: 1 , Traffic signal timings were modified from existing timings to optimize intersection operation, Modifications includ e both changes in individual phases and cycle lengths. AS OCiATED TI ANSPORTATI+ON EN II EERING & PLAfi NIN (A °FEP) PAGE 3 [,, 2. Peak hour factors used based on existing traffic counts were 0.9 to 0.95 for the p.m. peak and 0.9 for the a.m. peak. 3. Truck percentages used in the analysis were based on the truck counts performed during i g turna movement counts. 4. Each of the Hwy 217 intersections operates as an isolated intersections • " the 1Napleleaf p intersections t and Locust Street intersections are interconnected. NO: ..hh. Based on the analysis found later in this re port, the following findings are made: The. Lincoln Center Development, currently generates approximately 6,030 daily trips (3,015 round trips). During the afternoon peak hours approximately 895 trips occur ( 156 in and 740 out at the existing site driveways. The proposed 140,000 square foot general office building will add approximately 150 vehicles during the pm peak hour ( 25 in and 125 out) • The existing road network system within the study area is currently operating at less than acceptable levels of service at specific intersections and dviil continue to be over capacity until improvements are made in the near future' Intersection and roadway improvements required to accommodate the existing development in the area (Lincoln V) are to be completed in the near future rg increased dramatically over the past have in Traffic volumes in the Greenbu Road area hav f years without additional improvements to the surrounding street system. The development of the Lincoln Center property with an additional building will not have a significant impact to the surrounding street system Based upon : preliminary capacity analysis at the intersections along Greenburg Road, use signal i system could eliminate some of the current delay and of a traffic se nil coord�nat,on s stern congestion The land uses and internal roadway scheme proposed with Scenario 2 will provide some ... benefits to the transportation system in this area of the City. The ' realignment of the ASSOCIATED TRANSPORT ATION E NGINEERING & PLANNING G (ATEP) PAGE GE six Ip Mapleleaf entrance will improve the approach to the Greenburg Road signal. Inge Center should be reconstructed to provide Mapleleaf Drive with three The entrance t+� Lincoln p exit lanes and a straight stacking area. An internal bu s stop should be located inside the development to facilitate transit. ridership A car- vanpool service should be implemented for the site. The service would match interested employees with others in the development for joint ridership. Convenient parking areas for car and vanpool participants should be implemented on site. ASSOCIATE TlNs�QRTATiairsl ENoCa1EER.s!°blo � Pl.�►�1idl(�G �AT��) ��►�� 4.. r,• The study area has been determined based on M guidelines recommended by VVashington County and conversations with City and Oregon Department of Transportation staff. Figure 2 shows the study area as defined by Washington County using the 10 percent impact area The guidelines state that if the ratio of site- generated traffic to existing traffic on a given link is greater than 10 percent, then this link is impacted by the site and intersections on this link should be analyzed. Based on these guidelines, the following intersections were analyzed: 1) Greenburg Road and Highway 217 southbound on /off ramp 2) Greenburg Road and Highway 217 northbound on/off ramp 3) Greenburg Road and Mapleleaf Street 4) Greenburg Road and Locust Street 5) Hall Boulevard and Locust Street 6) Hall Boulevard and Oak Street y, / • the ., connections with th Add��:o�nal! the new north south internal access roads and their connection surrounding street system as identified by the Lincoln Center Plan were included in the analysis for future road conditions. SITE CONDITIONS AND ADJACENT LAND USES The existing zoning for the project site is general office. 'fhe entire Lincoln Center site comprises the 724,800 square feet of general office and 17,050 square feet of quality restaurant, Since the property is bounded on three sides by roadways, the only adjacent property is to the west and is currently zoned general office. EXISTING ROADWAYS City to Highway 26 on the n h and is g major north/ south link from the � ty 'g y north Greenburg Road is a n1a ur north soy described as an arterial street in the Transportation Element of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan the major gt q. p west and It serves access s as .he rna'or ror.�te for acs •he Washington Square Development on the `�r to the commercial of Highway 217 and the residential developments `to the rcna areas north !� serves • i � '� i at ail n each direction with left-turn a Green ter Road is a 2-lane section w lanes sou nntersectiuns. North of Locust Street, Greenburg load transitions ons i nta a two-lane section left turn pockets at major intersections Highway 217 is a esignated freeway that flows from the !_g interchange the south and winds . rc angea � � � .: lane Highway 21 a is a four a its way through the City and connects to Highway 26 OR the'nob�t�t�► ASSOCIATED & PLANNING (AMP) PAGE 6 section with interchange ramps at the major intersections. Hall Boulevard serves as an arterial street between the City Beaverton on the north and west, and the City of Tigard g rd on the south. This road is generally a two-lane section with one through lane in each direction and left -turn pockets at major intersections: Locust Street is designated as a minor collector road and serves as a connector between Greenburg Road and Hall Boulevard. Locust Street is a two -lane section with curbs and sidewalks on the west end and is an unimproved street to the east of Lincoln Center. PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND OPERATIONS Evening peak hour turning movement traffic counts were conducted at the key intersections listed above by ATEP and additional counts were gleaned'frorn recent traffic studies in the area These intersections are adjacent to the Lincoln Center property end along ke y arterial in the area The evening peak hour was from 4:30 to 5 :30 p.m Upon review of these peak hour traffic counts, the p.m. peak period was determined to be the most critical time in terms of traffic impacts at the intersections in the study area No adjustments to the volumes have been made to account for seasonal variations in traffic volumes. Figure 3 show the existing p.m peak hour traffic volumes at the key intersections in the study area TRIP GENERATION Estimates of total daily a.m. and p.m. peak hour driveway volumes for the existing uses were developed from empirical observations at many similar -sized facilities located throughout the United States. These empirical observations are summarized in a standard reference manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, and are supported by additional �r independent studies conducted by both the California Departmen Transportation and the Arizona Department of 1 ranspor ation. Estimating the number of vehicle trip ends that will be generated by the pr posed development is of prime importance in order to accurately assess the impacts of development on the roa d network Two basic procedures are available to traffic engineers for estimating the number of driveway p proposed vehicle trips generated by at ro b osed but not -yet -existing development 1, A Apply averages observed ed thro g h Meld studies conducted at other s. imi lar facilities located througho ut the United States. A number of sources are available for this information including r .�...._._._ 1987, which � rtatio Y p 7�r1 �aeratdor is of Trans and c�a1 nth l�r�it�o .. e o n Engineers (ITC) and summary trip generation reports prepared by the California Department of Transportation, the Arizona Department of Transportation, and other public transportation ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING (ATEP) PAGE 7 agencies. All of these sources provide excellent guidance in estimating the trip generation rates for various land uses, but obviously do not take into account the effects of local conditions and unique characteristics of the proposed land use . Observe through field studies the actual trip generation characteristics of other similar and existing developments within the local area Procedure two above was used in the development of this report. edu � p Traffic counts were taken at all existing driveways into the Lincoln Center development for three days the week of September 4, 1990. The three day average number of trips into and out of the development were compared to the ITF Trip Generation figures as shown in f=igure 7. Additionally, a questionnaire was distributed to the employees of the center requesting information about travel patterns to and from the development Table 1 shows the expected number of vehicle trip ends to be generated by the proposed development on a daily p.m. peak hour basis compared to the actual traffic counts taken during the data collection portion of this reports Table 1 indicates that the existing development is generating pm peak the national average. eneratin m eak hiour trips r �s at a rate lower' than th For the purposes of this analysis, it was also assumed that none of the home - related person trips will be made by mass transit. This assumption is considered to be appropriate since even though Tri -Met provides service to within about one - quarter mile of the site ridership is very Iow. Further, assuming no transit ridership results in a Worst-Case scenario for traffic impacts to the street system even though the driver survey indicates an approximate 2% bus usage for the development. ari Existing Development Table 1 � Trip Generation Comparison With the construction of t he Lincoln Center Building, the Lincoln Center development will be complete The previous approval (SDR 87-08) of the development at that point, evaluated the development as one building added to another building. This incremental approach to Trip ASSOCIATED TI ANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING (ATEP) PAGE 8 Generation creates the ultimate "Worst Case Condition" in that the trips generated by a single building is greater than the trip generation from the entire development. This is caused by the Trip Generation Manual using the size of the r ,,silding as the variable in calculating the trips generated from a development. The number of trips per 1000 square feet of office building decreases as the total square footage increases. Since each Lincoln Center building was evaluated as a single trip generator, the cumulative affect is to greatly overestimate the number of trips that the total development will generate. As Table 1 indicates, the actual number of trips generated by the development are considerably less than ITE projects. ASSOCIATED TI ANSPO..R1`ATION ENGINES III & PLAl NIN 'ATEI' PAGE 9 LOCUST : AVE r NORTH MAPLELEAF NORTH MAFLELEA OAK 5T LINCOLN CENTER I5TEN& TRAFF ICr VOL M 5 PEAK HOUR L C LEVELS OF SERVICE The peak hour traffic operations, in terms of levels of service, at the key intersections in the study area were examined with procedures described in the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual (Reference 2). Levels of service (LOS) is a concept that was developed to measure how the driver perceives the conditions surrounding them as they travel through a signalized intersection or roadway segment. This degree of perception includes such elements as travel time, number of stops, total amount of stopped delay, and impedances caused by other vehicles. As originally defined by the 1965 Highway Capacity Manual six grades are used to denote the various LOS; these grades are shown in Table 1. Using this definition, it is generally agreed that "D" LOS is the minimum acceptable for an urban area. For the purposes of this analysis, the assumed relationship between the calculated stopped time delay per vehicle and the associated LOS for signalized intersections is given in Table 2. Unsignalized intersections require a somewhat different approach to determine the capacity of the intersection. The 1985 Highway Capacity Manual offers the concept of "Reserve Capacity" as the guideline for measuring the capacity. Reserve Capacity is defined as " that portion of available hourly capacity that is not used ". It should be noted that the Capacity only applies to the individual concept of Reserve Cap applies vidual rnovements of traffic raffic on an approach to an intersection, either in an individual lane or a shared lane, not to the overall operation of the intersection. This determination is made after all approaches are analyzed and the LOS determined. This is usually that approach that typifies the 'Worst Case" condition or worst level of service. A description of the levels of service relating to the Reserve Capacity Concept is shown in Tables 3 & 4 I , Past experience with the unsignalized analysis procedure indicates that this methodology is very conservative in that it to ids to overestimate the magnitude of any potential problems that might exist. Therefore, the results of any unsignalized intersection analysis should be viewed with this thought in mind. Within the City and in Washington County, LOS D is considered to be the minimum acceptable standard for ah unsignalized intersection. LOS analyses presented y p ted in this report were performed in accordance with the procedures described above, For each intersection these analyses estimate the overall intersection LOS during the peak hour flow. ASSOCIATED TI AI SPORTATIoN EI.1GiNEERiNG r PLANNING (ATEP) PAC 1 IH Table 2 Level Of Service Definitions (Signalized 'Intersections) lc 'e$I ietlet social 016n rc esear`c ASS CI TED TR iNS ORTATION • LNGI ER�I\IG Si F PAIN � (i�TEP) PAGE 3 Table 3 Criteria For Signalized Intersections ASSOCIATE© TRANSPORTAT ON 'ENG NEERIN & PLANNII G �ATEP) 'PAGE 14 Table 4 - Level Of Service Definitions (Unsignalized Intersections) ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & I' NNING (ATEP) PAGE 15 Table 5 - Criteria. For Unsignalized Intersections acoumtered with ueuj ��ne °� .::.' 1:..... ...:fin r.. � is n t � t ASSOCIATED TRANS , PC�. RrATI+CJN Table 6 - Existing Levels of Service at Critical intersections !'r i J•. ersietianv'r. !ca aei Table 6 indicates that capacity deficiencies exist during the p.m. peak period along Greenburg road at Mapleleaf, Hwy 217 on and off ramps. Highway 217 also is approaching capacity with delays and congestion occurring during the p.m. peak hour: This capacity deficien cy pertains to the through movements along Greenburg Road being at capacity. This makes the left turn movement from the side street onto Greenburg Road experience long delays waiting to exit onto the main street. '=or the purposes of this report, this scenario does not take into consideration other projects currently under development within the study area This scenario looks ` at the Lincoln Center property with the addition of a 140,000 square foot general office building to be located on the north side of Mapleleaf Drive just to the west of the existing Lincoln Ofto e Center building. Access into the site under this scenario would include the existing access points from Oak Street, Locust Street and a reconstructed entrance from Mapleleaf Drive: Mapleleaf Drive would be reconstructed to accommodate three (3) lanes of exiting traffic with the existing traffic circle removed. Access o ut of the site would be from the existing road system. See Figure 4 ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING (ATEP) PAGE 17 8 LOCU5T AVE TRIP GENERATION Estimates of total daily and p.m. peak hour driveway volumes for the proposed building were developed from the trip generation study conducted by ATEP and Trammell Crow staff, the week of September 4, 1990. By '.using manual and mechanical ` Ease counters, the existing driveways into and lit of the site were counted for three (3) days during the week of September 4, 1990. These traffic counts w ere then averag ad and compared the total leasable square re footage of the existing buildings by the specific land use to determine the daily and pm peak hour trips generation for the site As indicated in Table 1, the existing development generates less trips than the ITE national averages for the type of land use This trip generation data was used in the development of the trip generation factors used for the proposed development Additionally the information provided by the employee questionnaire was used in the trip carpool transportation determination of tri p uses.' de reduction factors for agar oo and alternative mode of .trans The trip reduction factors indicated a 2% bus usage, a 3.9% carpool usage and a 1% bike and walking usage. Using the information above Table 7 shows the expected number of vehicle trip ends to be generated by the proposed development on a daily and p.m peak hour basis. Table 7 - Trip Generation for Proposed Addition ua e ar dUse.. tiera11, 0th ire are Feet eriued fr, rr► actual <trir► generation k' TRIP DISTRIBUTION The distribution of generated trips onto the roadway system within the site area was determined by the information collected by the questionnaire distributed to the Lincoln Center employees. Approximately 1,570 questions were distributed to the employees the week of September 4, 1990 requesting information to the time of day the exited the site, but also the direction and q g day o nd streets used Of those 1,570 questionnaire approximately 1,138 questionnaires were returned+. questionnaire h The results of this uestionnaire are shown in Figure 6. ASSOCIATEf `TRANSPC RTA11O ENGINEERING & PL.ANNING (ATEP} PAGE 19 FIGURE 5 - LINCOLN I ENTER TENANT TRAFFIC SURVEY RESULTS LINCOLN CENTER TENANT TRAFFIC SURVEY SEPT 7, 1990 LOCUST GREENBURG TIMES TO NNALL % TO TIGARD GREENBURG 217 OAK TOTAL TO % NOR:TH % TO % % TIME PORTLAND HALL BUS FRAME BEFORE 4 PM 4:00 -4.15 4:15-4:30 4.30 -4.45 t :45 -5 :00 5.00 -5 :15 5:15 -5:30 9.41% 19` 16.10 %'. 8.24% 17 9 7.32% 15.29% 10.06% -:5.30 -5 :45 5 :45 -6:.00 600 -6-15 6 :15 -6:30 6 :30 ON TOTAL PER RCOTE PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL 25.42% 4.71 %; 20 16.95% 8.24% 8 6.78% 5.88% 5.29% 9.71 %. 7.94% 21.95% 88 25.88% 6.50% 34 10.00% 4.88% 23 6.76% 4.88% 26 7.65% 16 4.71% 0 0.00% i .6930 , 0 0.00% 5.03% 24 8.28% 71 24.48% 21.74% G.00% 7.21% 13 4.48% 3.79% 5:62% 8.13% 7.47% 10.375E 10.81% 500 PEAK' HOUR PERCENTAGE 1 52.7% 2.02% 100.00% ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING, (ATEP) PAGE 20 The site-generated traffic shown in Figure 7 was combined with the existing traffic volumes shown in Figure 3 to arrive at the total p.m peak hour traffic for Lincoln Center development shown in Figure 8, Peak hour 'levels of service was determined at the intersections within the study area for the property pp p development of the Lincoln Center roe under proposed development designations. Table deve In Cer�te 8 indicates that the intersections within the study area will function at an adequate levels of service, provided intersection ' improvements are made in addition to those required for the existing scenario. Table f 8 - Levels of Service at Critical Intersections Proposed Development .I. As shown in Table 8, with the proposed traffic changes to be constructed during the next year, the intersections along Greenburg Road would not be affected by the additional traffic generated by the development. f SS CIATED TRANSPORTAT`ION EN I iEE6 ING + PLANNING � ThP) PAGE 21 LOC U5T 29.88% OAK 5T PACE 22 rf cis e LOC.U5T AVE NORTH OAK 5T D Ft URE LOUT NORTH 4--171 Ar- I OAK ST L_ 1. OLN CENTER TOTAL. 1RAFF I C _ VQL.UM 5 PEAK HOUR This area is currently served by Tri -Met Routes 43 and 78, which run between the Tigard Transit Center and downtown Portland. The buses run on a 30 minute headway during the morning (6:00 a.m. to 9 :00 a.m.) and evenings between (4 :00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m.). 0. study area. The improvements required are already funded and in the process of design. These improvements include a new traffic signal at Locust Street, interconnecting the signals at Locust and at Mapleleaf Drive. As the intersection analysis results illustrated, capacity improvements are necessary in order to accommodate the projected traffic passing through the intersections within the In addition to the signal improvements that will be completed, Washington County and ODOT will widen the Greenburg Road Interchange by adding an new southbound through lane over the structure. v e along with changes to optimize the existing traffic signals These improvements at the off-ramps should ease the congestion through the interchange area Other changes in traffic g flow were considered during the preparation of this report and were considered to be long range and would require analysis outside the boundaries of this impact analysis. Those included the widening of Greenburg Road to provide an additional northbound though lane between Oak Street and the Nordstrom entrance to Washington Square, removing . the second left turn lane from Greenburg Road and Mapleleaf intersection and requiring traffic to make the left turn further north where capacity constraints are less, interconnecting the 217 off ramps with the intersections to the north and south. This report has demonstrated that development of the Lincoln Center property and other major parcels in the surrounding area, as well as the natural growth of the existing developed areas, will create tremendous traffic demands on the City's street system in this area Other types of trip reductions should be considered before extensive improvements are made. - A majority of the improvements described in this report are a result of not having lanes traffic. As a result, the include the to carry all of e traffic vin the number of larae� of traffic needed �: improvements to the intersections n ct o s Includ'r additional travel lanes. , During preparation of the p IJu Lincoln V Traffic 'l intersections Impact Analysis, the interconnection rm the . p y � � . ens along Greenburg Ile Ion Q all the Inte�'SeCtl Road was evaluated, ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING (ATEP) PAGE 25 Currently the existing traffic signal systern along Greenburg Road is not interconnected. That means that each signalized intersection operates by itself (except for the Highway 217 Ramps during the p.m, peakhour) and is not connected to the other signals in the area g in urban areas throughout the United States. This type of Signal Coo�rdinatiaan control is used . �'p In the west, and in many other areas it has been used successfully. Based upon a preliminary capacity analysis at the intersections along Greenburg Road, the use of a coordinated traffic signal system could help reduce the need for the additions! through lanes required by the future traffic volumes. Deman i ��es�ei�t - The information provided by the eniploye.e survey indicates that a small percentage of people within the complex currently use some sort of Demand Management. Although a ` small percentage, the survey indicates that additional reductions in trips could be accomplished if additional effort were made to provide the employees information regarding the services listed below exist. necessary. Some of these are described below: Transit - The employee survey indicated that transit ridership could be increased` by 100% if the site were included in Tri-Mets route and a bus stop were installed at the site. Tri -Met does provide extehsivia service within the area that is designed to manage internal traffic. The development could work with Tri -Met to improve service, especially to the major employment areas. Flex Time - Probably the easiest way to reduce traffic impacts is to spread out the peak hour. Adoption of flex hours for major e p l yors , so that employees left wor k at alternatives to 5 pm, would substantially help solve the congestion, convenience, and safety problems that high trip i ' "no-cost" 'no-impact" alternative to street hi h peak hour tra levels cause. This is also a na cast and nt� widening and can save significant tax dollars. The employee survey indicated that approximately 48% of the trips to the site occur outside the existing pm pp y .p ' � p peak Maur. This indicates that the existing traffic into and out of the site are indeed using "Flex Time" Vanpools p' s - Currently only 4% of the existing users of the site carpool. This Carpools and fan � y indicates that additional trips could be reduced by the creation of site carpool program. The City could encourage use of th is system. As n ells the develo p ment could ld fee that preferential p arkin g locations a nd rates are provided ed to car and vanpools. Cycling and Walking The development can encourage non - motorized travel by assuring that adequate, convenient, and attractive sidewalks and bike lanes are provided between residential and ernployrient areas. Currently only 1% of the trips are made by alternative means. •ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION ENCl 1FERING c RIAP�@IING (�►TFP) PA E 2f The development can take several roles in implementing these types of programs. At a minimum, it can be made public policy to su pp ort these types of programs through coordination w th other agencies, funding for appropriate projects and programs, and consideration in planning actions and future Comprehensive Plan updates. A more aggressive approach can be taken by offering incentives for developments that provide demand management programs. For example, a reduction in required parking could be accomplished if could be given in exchange for an employers implementing a permanent program providing free bus passes to employees. The existing traffic s from existing developments are creating a demand for various majorr and minor street, improvements to effectively manage traffic. The development of the Lincoln Center property with an additional building will not have a significant impact to the surrounding street system. Based upon a preliminary capacity analysis at the intersections along Greenburg Road, se of a traffi c signal coordination system could eliminate some of the current delay and congestion. The land uses and internal roadway scheme proposed with Scenario 2 will provide some benefits to the transportation system in this area of the City. The realignment of the p leaf entrance will improve the approach to the Greenburg Road signal. Additional try reductions ductionscould be accomplished with the development of a car and van pool program and increased transit ridership. ASSOCIATED TIRANSPORTATI0N ENGINEERING & PLANNING (ATEP) PAGE 27 report are constructed. To ensure the safe and efficient movement of traffic and pedestrians within the area, the following traffic operational improvements are recommended. Based on the results of the traffic access analysis described in this report, it is concluded that the property as proposed can be developed if the operational traffic improvements listed in this The development of the property known as Lincoln Center under the proposed development plan would require the following improvements. . Constructson i of a new entrance to the Lincoln Center development at Mapleleaf Drive with three exit lanes and a straight stacking area. . The development work with Tri-Met to add a bus stop internally to the site along Mapleleaf Drive. • The development implement a car- vanpool service for the sited The service would match interested employees with others in the development for joint ridership, . The development designate convenient parking areas for car and vanpool participants.' ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING (ATOP) PAGE 28 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY DEPORT a * * *3b ** ** * * * *: ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** *3* * * * * * * * * ** * * ** * * *f* INTERSECTION..LO'UST /HALL BLVD AREA TYPE... .OTHER ANALYST....... OW DATE.,......„09/18/90 TINE.......... PM PEAK; COMMENT... ...EXISTING VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WE NB St1' : EP WE NB SB LT 15 35 15 15 : LTR 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TN 5 15 570 445 ; 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12,E RT 45 70 40 10 : 12.0 12.0 12,0 12.0 RR 10 10 10 10 ; 12.0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE NV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (',) ( %) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 Y 20 0 0.90 ` 50 N ' 20.5 WE 0.00 2.00 Y 20 0 0.90 50 N 20,5 S NB 0.00 2.00 ` Y 20 0 0.90 50 N 8.5 3 SE 0.00 2.00 Y 20 0 0.90 50 N 8.5 O SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 05.0 PH -1 PH -2 PH -3 PH -4 PH -1 PH -2 PH -3 PH -4 EBB LT X NB LT X TN X TH X RT X' RT X PD X PD WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X GREEN 1000 0 0.0i 0.0 0.0 GREEN 67.0 0.0 ' 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP., V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB LTR 0.415 0.129 22.9 C 22.9 WE L 0.173 0.129 25.1 D 23.5 C TR 0.153 0.129 21.3 C NB _ L 0. R2 0, 800 1.3 A 2.6 A TR 0.590 0.800 246 A SB L 0.029 0.800 1.3 A 1.8 A TR 0.434 0.800 1.8 A INTERSECTION. Delay 4.3 (sec /veh) V/C = 0,566 LOS A { 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ******x********************************************* ** H.,**w * *HHHH * ** * ** INTERSE►TI0N.,SOND RAMP 217 /GREENSJRS RD AREA TYPE...., OTHER ANALYST,,..... OW DATE.......... 09/18/90 0 6_ TIME.......... PH PEAK COMMENT.,.... EXISTING VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WO NB SD ED WD NB BE LT 288 0 9 457 „ L 12,0 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 TH 0 0 602 922: R 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 RT 639. 0 140 0 ': 12.0 12.0' R 12.0 T 12.0 RR 200 0 130 0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12.0 12.10 12.0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PEG BUSES ,PHF PEDS PED BUT. APR. TYPE. (Z) () Y/N Nip Nb Y/N min T EB 0,00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 20.5 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 20.5 3 N6` 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 8.5 SEA 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0,90 0 N 8.5 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH 80,0 PH-1 PH-2 PH -3 PH -4 PH-1 PH -2 PH -3 PH-4 EB LT NB LT TH TH X RT }, RT X PD PD X WE LT SD LT X TH TH X RT RT PD PD X GREEN 16.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 26.0 28.0 0.0" 0,0 YELLOW 4,0` 0.0'- 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4,0 4.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANEGRP, V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS ED L 0,890 0,213 39.3 D R 1.516> 0.213 NB r 0.584 0,338 14.6 B 14.5 R 0.023 0.338 11.4 B SD L 0.482, 0.330 16.E C 10.4 8 T' 0.807 0,712 74 INTERSECTTON: Delay = * fsecive h, V/C 0.970 LOS � � • 1985 NCH: ' SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT * ** * * ** * * * *Hf * * *** * * * * * * ** ** * * * * * * * * *i * ** ** * ** *t. * * * * * * * * * ** * * *13:. INTERSECTION. , NRAMP 217 /GREENBURL AREA TYPE..,..OTHER ANALYST......, OW DATE.,........09 /18/90 PEAK COMMENT ,.... EXISTING VOLUMES GEOMETRY ED WB NB SB : EP WD NS SP LT 0 334 256 0 I 12.0 L 12,8 L 12.0 HT 1.0 TN 0 0 64 1045: 12.0 R 12,8 i 12.0 T 12.0 RT S 50E 0 405 12.0 12,0' 12.0 12.0 RR 0 100 0 350 I 12.0 12,(0 12.[(0 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 2. 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 '12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTOR" GRADE HV ADJ ,PI.G BUSES PHF I, IDS PED, BUT. ARP:. TYPE (7.) ({) ND; I Nk Y/N in T EE 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0,10 0 N 22.8 ` WB 0.00 2, 00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 2.2.E 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 11,3 SB ,0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 11.3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LEN TH = 95.0 PH -1 PH -2 PH -3 PH -4 PH-1 PH-2 PH -3 PH-4 EB. LT NB LT 7 TN TH X 7 RT RT PD PD 7 7 WE LT K SP LT TH TH 7. RT X PT 7 PD 7 PD 7 GREEN 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 15.0 48.0 0.0 0.0: YELLOW 4.0' 0,0 0,0 0.0 YELLOW 4,0 4.0 0,0 0,0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C 8/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP, LOS WE ` L 0,992 0'.221 61.7 F P 1.354 0.221 NB L 0,998' 0,16E 70.3 F 23,4 G T 0.552 0.716 4.4 A SB T 0.663 0.516 11.5 13 11,3 B R 0,078 0.516 7.5 E INTERSECTION: DQi8yy * tsec /veh) V /C = 0,894 LOS 1985 RCM; SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION., LOCUSTIGREENBURG RD AREA TYPE., OTHER ANALYST,...,.. Ow' DATE...,...... 09/17/90 PEAK; COMMENT. , .. .EXISTING VOLUMES GEOMETRY ES WB NB SB : ES NB 1 NB SB LT 0 155 0 68 , R 12.0 L 12.E T 12.0 L 12.0 TH 0 0 454 537: 12.0 R 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 RT 20 195 97 26 12.0 12.0 12,0 TR 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12,0 12.0 12,0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS SPADE H',' ADJ F''!:, '' BUSES PHF FEDS FED. BUT, ARR. TYPE (Y,) (X) ' YIN Na' Nb Y/N min T ES 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 N' 22.8 W�G 0: , 00 2.00 N 0 0 0,90 10 N - 22.8 ' 8 NB 0,0C 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 N 16,8 SD 0,00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 N 16.8 3, SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = '85.0 ES LT PH-1 PH -2 PH -3 FN -4 PH-1 PH-2 PH -3 PH-4 NB LT TH TH RT X RT FD_ PD X. WB LT X SF LT X TN TH .X X RT X RT X X PD PD X X GREEN 29,0 0,0 0,0 0.0 GREEN 1 25.0 19,0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 4,0 0,0 0,0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP, V/C C/C DELAY LOS APP, DELAY APP. LOS ER R 0,0€2 0,353 11,7 1 B 11.7 18 WA'' L 0,344 0,353 15,5 C 14,6 ' A R 0.408 0,353 13.7 B NB TR 0.788 0,235 22,8 C 22.8 G SB L 0.146 0,306 16.3 C 7.1 B TR 0.321 0.576 6,1 INTERSECTION: Dclay = 14,'4u(sec /veh) V/C 0,418( LOS = B • 1585 g-1CM; SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT * * ** * ***** k'`+' ********* ********'.*** * **:* * ** **'/'; *** *7***3: * :y*********.**** INTERSECTION. MAPLELEAF/ GPEENBURG RD AREA TYPE.. .OTHER ANALYST, ,..,..DW DATE......, .09/17/90 TIME , ..... . PM PEAK COMMENT, ...... EXISTING VOLUMES ; GEOMETRY ED WE NB SB ; ED WB NB SD LT 34 243 462 16 ; LT 12.0 L 12.0 L 112.0 L ;.2,0 TH 15 28 618 69E ; R 12,0 LIP, 12.0 LT 12.0 T 12.0 RT 585 18 64 30 ; R 1.2.0 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RR 350 10 20 10 ; 12.0 12.0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE NV AD,I PKG , BUSES PHE PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (.) , Cr.) YIN Nm Nb � Y/N a;i n T ES 0.00 2,00, N 0 0 0.90 10 N 25,8 WP 0,00 2.00 N 0 0 0.50 10 N 25.13 3 NB 0.01 2.00 N 0' 0 0,90 10 N 25.8 ,; 3 SB 0,001 2.00 N 0, 0 0,90 10 H 25.8 3 SIGNAL' SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 104.0 PH -1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH -1 PH -2 PH-? PH-4 ES LT X NB LT TH Y, TH ' X RT X RT X PD X PD X WE LT K SB LT I, TH X TH I RT ?; RT PD X PD ; X GREEN 23.0 25.0 0,0 0,0 GREEN 25.0 19.0 0,0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0,0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0,0 LEVEL OF. SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C pit, DELAY LOG APP, DELAY APP, LOG EB LT 0.143 0,22t, 21,1 C 12,8 E R 0,130 0, f' 10,4 0 4 . 23 0.360 0.240 25.2 0 G WI' L � LTR 0.416 0,240 21.3 C NB L 0.694 0.240', 23.0 0 * TR 1.736 0.240 1r 4 SB L 0.057 0.183 26.7 D TR 1.283 0.183 * * INTERSECTION; DElAy * (seclvab) V/C t 0,910 LOS ,44:iti. 1SE` HCN: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS V ] �{�y, Y yy µyyy yy 3ti ytS� yYy t�Ly �ty11. yyY Y.y .i Y'1 Y Page-1. $**; * * ** **'** * * ** *iL'£.n #F. TF�F *.**F,***4l FTR7 T, 7.Tn.Tliy'�"'L�[ kF**i.4.4* iT, IDENTIFYING INFORIATIOU AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET,,. 4 R , , , I ,� t , J ... . 35 PEA }, HOUR FACTOR, , .. A . , , , .... , , """''"I' , S AREAPOPULATION— 14111131111111/111111 111111111 S , 1.,00E0 NAME OF THE EAST /WEST STREET., 1110i 8'4 I II 4 t OAK ST NAME OF THE NORTH /SOUTH STREET.. ,11311 HALL BLVD NAME OF THE ANALYST... 4..,...,, DW DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm /dd /Y5'),,, 4411111 ,, „, ,, 03/07/0 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED, ,. ►..,,t,.,, ,,, ,,. PM PEAK; OTHER INFORMATION: EXISTING INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: 4 —LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH /SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND; STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES WB NEc SB LEFT 30 35 50 THF;U 30 22 485 480 RIGHT 100 80 80 10 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE EE W1 NS SS .1 C n ADJUSTMENT FACTORS` , }y PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0,00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 SOUTHBOUND 0,00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION 7, SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV' S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT 01ST. FINAL (Table 10 -2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS WB' 5.70 5,70 0,00 5,70 E8 5,70 5.70 0.00 5.70 MAJOR LEFTS SB 5,60 5,60 0.00 5.60 NB 5.60 5.60 0,00 5,60 MINOR THROUGHS NB 6.90 6,80 0.00 6,80 EB' 6.80 6.80 0,00 6,80 MINOR LEFTS WB 7,30 7,30 0.00 7.30 Et ' 7, 30 7.20 0,00 7,20 n • • a • r:APACI y AND LEVCL— OF- SFFVIrE' POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW— TEAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAFACITY CAPACITY CA'ACIT`! MOVEMENT v(pcph' c (pcoh) r (pcph' c (p ph) ,: s; — v p m SH R SH MINOR STREET NS LEFT 37 91 59 59 22 E THROUGH 27 141 126 126 > toe f+ E RIGHT 73 804 804 33 804 F 230 731 ))C A MINOR STREET ED LEFT 24 '3S 72 72 48 E THROUGH 37 139 124 124 \ 88 > E RIGHT 122;, 018 B18 3ss ale i 199 696 ;.D A MAJOR STREET N° LEFT 42 595 595 595 SA LEFT 61 575 575 575 514 514 tfr • 1'98 HCI1 SIGNALIZED'• INTERSECTION •SUMMARY REPORT ...*****04****- •INTERSECTI.0N, , .QCCUSTIGREENBIIRG RI< AREA TYPE.:.. ; OTHER pk AfSr.LYST...... ■DN. DATE;'.... 09/17/98 TIMP ....,.,,PN PEA} C0(1(iENT.,.. .aTOTAL TRAFFIC VGl.UME5 GEOMETRY ECi 148 NB SB : EH 1d5 • NR 55 LT 0 X40 70 ; R 12,0 w 12.0 T 12.0 L; 12.0 TH 0 X56 537 s 12,0 R 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12 0 RT 20 157 105 26 , 12a 12.0 12.0 T.R 12.0 RR G 0 0.. c 12.0 12.0' I ,0 12.0 12.0 1 22.0 • 12, 0 12.0 11.0 1L. _ 12,.0 . _ - - - - AD 1USTIENT FACTORS GRADE ;USES REDS . ARR, - -- TYPE Ni ..t Nb YIN min T DEB 0{.00 2.0' N �0{ r0 •j0.90 10 N i.E� 3 1d�i 0.0 G.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 N 22.0 3 • 149 0.00 2.00' N h 0. 10 N 16.8 S5 0.01' 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 N 1568 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CCLELENGTH = 95,0 Pfd -1 PH -L PH -3 F'H -4 • PH- i PH -2 PH -3 PH-4 ER LT N3 LT TH � :TN H. RT h RT X PD PD 18 LT • 7 sp. LT TH TH k X )�T k RT 7 • 7 • PD i� PD 7 X GREEN 25,0 0.0 1�.0 0.0 GREEN 25. it 15,0 0 8 0, YELLQW 0.0 0.0 • 0.0 YELLO14 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 7.EVEL GE SERVICE LAME GP,Pw V/C C /C DEL 1Y LQS APP. DELAY • APP. LDS EB, R 0.M 2 0,353 11.7 8 11.7, 8 148 t. • 0.44G 0 353 1E �# t; 15.2 r, R G. 412 • 0,353 13.7 S 148 TR O. SG' 0 235 23.3 G 23.3 C 581 L 0.150 0.306 16,3 • 8 TR •0, 32 0.576 6 1 8 ...,««««««« ««« - rrly.M« 1«.wr« one«« ««.. ««««b..«««««««««««« INTERSECTION. Delay 14.8 (see /v &lei' V/C 0.439 ~- w- rLGS "�..8 -4 L _ � r 4 yr i 1985.HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTIOl LOCUST /HALL BLVD AREA 'TYPE.—.,OTHER ANALYST..... DW DATE,.,,......09 /18/9C TIME.......... PM PEAK COMMENT....... TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : ES WS NB SB LT 18 35 25 15 : LTR 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 5 20 570 445: 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12,0 RT 50 20 40 .116 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0. PR 10 10 10 10 ; 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12,0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12.0 12,0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS PEDS PED. BUT. ARR, TYPE GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF, (%) (X) Y/N Nn ND YIN min T EB 0,00 2.00 Y 20 0 0.90 50 N 20,5 3 WS 0.00 2,00 Y 20 0 0.90 50 N 20.5 3 NB 0,00 2.00 Y 20 0 0.90 50 N 8.5 3 SB 0,00 2,00 Y 20 0 0,90 50 N 8.5 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 85,0; PH-1 PH -2 PH -3 PH -4 PH -1 PH-2 PH -3 PH-4 EB LT k NF LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD K WB LT X" SB LT X TH X TH X RT X PT 'X PD X PD X GREEN 10.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 GREEN 67,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP, DELAY APP, LOS EB LTR 0,476 0,129 23;7 C 23,7 C WB' L 0,176 0.129 25.1 D 23,4 C TR 0.193 0.129 21,4 r NB L 0,038 0,800 1,3 A 2,5 A TR 0.590 0.800 2,6 A 313 L 0,029 0,800 1.3 A 1,8 A TR 0,441 0.800 1.9 A I'NTERSECTIUNI D9lay 4, (sc /v81) V/C = 0.574 LOS = A 0 C 1985 HCM: SIGNALLED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..SBND RAMP 217 /GREEMDURG RD AREA TYPE.....OTHEF: ANALYST... , - D! DATE.,..... 09/18/90 T'IME.....`...PM PEA1, COMMENT-. -.TOTAL TRAFFIC WITH MITIGATION VO LUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB' WB NB S8 LT 293 0 0 471 L: 12,0 12.0 f 12.0 L 12,0 TH 0 0 602 930 : R 12.0 11.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 RT 639 0 140 0 ' 12.0 12.0 R 12,0 T 12.0 RR 200 0 130 0 : 12.0 12,0 12..0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HY ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEGS RED, BUT. ARR. TYPE (7.) ( %) Y/11 Nm Mb Y/N in T EB 0.00 2,00 N 0 0 0,90 0 N 20.5 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 20.5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.30 0 N 8.5 S8 0.00 2.00 N G 0 0.90 0 N 8.5 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH - 89,0 PH -1 PH-2 PH -3 PH -4 PH -1 PH -2 PH-3 PH -4 E8 LT Y NB LT TH TH 1 RT X RT X PD 1 PD WB LT S8 LT Y TH TH X X RT RT X Y, PD PD 1 / GREEN 25,0 0,0 0.0 0,0 GREEN 26.0 26.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4,0 4.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF. SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP, LOS EB L 0.558 0.292 23.2 C 57.2 E R 1.103 0.292. 79.8 F NE T' 0.650 0.303 18.2 C 18.1 C R 0.025 0.303 14.1 8 L 0.552 0.303 20.2 C 16.9 C T 0,905 0,640 15.2 C i.LY �•. .. r.. �rrY. r�.... 4. ��r- i« L.rr ..r.ur..r.4 ∎..Jwwti.Y.� «'.w.. INTERSECTION: D lay = 27.7 (sec /yell) V/C = 0.967 L0 •ii u7 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..SBIID RAMP 217 /GREENBURG RD AREA TYPE..... OTHER ANALYST,... DW DATE.......... 09118190 TIME..I......,PM PEAK COMMENT , ... TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES GEOMETRY ES WB NB SB ; ER WB NB SB LT 293 0 0 471 y 12.0 12.0 T 12,0 L 12,0 TN 0 0 602 930 ; R 12.0 12.0 T 12,0 L 12.0 RT 639 0 140 0 ; 12.0 12,0 F; 12,0 T 12,0 RR 200 0 130 0 . 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12,0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDE PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE. (X) (X) YIN Nn Nb Y /PN min T ER 0.00. 2,00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 20.5 3" NB 0,00 2,00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 20.5 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0,90 0 N 8.5 3 SB 0.0C 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 8,5 3 v. SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH r. 80.0 PH -I PH -2 PH -3 PH -4 PH -1. PH-2 PH -3 PH -4 ER LT X NB LT TH TH X RT I RT X PD I PD X WB LT SB LT TH TH X X RT RT X X PD PD I X GREEN 16.0 . 0 . 0.0 0.0 GREEN , 2 .6, P! 26.0 0.0 0,0 YELLOW 4.0 0,0 0.0 0,0 YELLOW 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP, ' VIC GIC DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS ER L 0.905 0.213 41.3 E 1.516 0.213 NB T 0,584 0.338 14.6 B 14,5 R , F: 0.023 0,338 11.4 B SB 0.497 0x338 18.8 C 10,E B 0.814 0.712 7,8 B INTPSCTION; Delay - 4 (sE /v hl V/C - 0.975 LOS =~ 1985 HCM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION. .NRAMP 217 /GREENBURG AREA TYPE. ... .OTHER ANALYST. ...DM DATE.. ......09/18/90 TIME... ,.PM PEAT; COMMENT...,... TOTAL TRAFFIC WITH MITIGATION VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB , NB SR ; EB WB MB S8 LT 0 334' 256 0: 12.0 L 12.0 L 12,0 T 12,0 TH 0 0 639 1067: 12.0 R 12.0 T 12.0 T 12,0 RT 0 513 0 450 : 12.0 12,0 12.0 R 12.E 100 0 350: 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12,0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE IU ADJ , P{.G BUSES PHF ', PEDS PED, 51ST, ARR. TYPE f %l (X) Y/N NM Mb Y/N min T EE: 0.00 2, 00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 22,8 3 WB 0.00 2,00 N 0 0 0,90 0 M 22.8 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 11.8 5B 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N; 11,3 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH r,. 110.0 PH -1 PH -2 PH -3 PH -4 PH -1 PH -2, PH-3 PH-4 EB LT NB LT TH TH X X RT RT PD PC MB LT X 53 LT TH TH RT 1 RT PD X PD 1 GREEN 30.0 0.0 0,0 0,0 GREEN 20,0 48.0 0,0 0.0 YELLOW 9.0 ' 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 4.0 0,0 0,0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V /C'' G/C DELAY LOS APP. ` DELAY APP, LOS WB !' 0.778 0.282 33.1 D 56.6 _, E R 1.075 0.282 75,5 E N+ L 0.880 0,191 49,1 E 18.2 C T 0.600 0.664 7.2 B 58 . T 0,784 0.445 18.4 C 17.8 0,178 0.445 11,9 B W .iri iirK :•...rrrrt.�wlnri...i..r KM Wu�r4..rW KK —KirK rK.r MNA.. "i+r— y.IKK.�r KrKK :.ter INTERSECTION: Delay _ 28.3 (sec /veh) VIC 0,893 LOS tt 8 1955 HCM; SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT *f * * * ** **f * ** * } ** *:f * f * *** *** * * *U* * + *HH * * * * *n * * * *** * * * *3: *$* *p3 ** INTERSECTION..NRAMP 217 /GFEENBURi; AREA TYPE....OTHEr; ANALYST...... , DW TIME., .......P11 PEAK COMMENT., ....TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES GEOMETRY ES WE NB SB . ED WE NB SS LT 0 334 256 0 ; 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12,0 TN 0 0 539 1067: 12.0 R 12.0 1' 12.0 T 12.0 RT 0 513 0 48 ; 12.0 12.0 12,0 F 12,0 RR. 0 100 0 350 ; 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE NV ADJ PlG BUSES PRE PEDS PED. BUT ARR. TYPE Cl) (7) YIN Nfll Nb YIN min T ES 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0,90 0 N 22.B WE 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0,90 0 N 22,8 3 NB 0.00 2.00 `' N 0 0 0.90 0 N 11,3 3 SB 0.00 2,08. N 0 0 0,90 0 N 11.3 3 SIGNAL 'SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 95.0 PH-1 PH -2 PH -3 PH -4 PH -1 PH -2 PH -3 P1-1-4 EH LT NB LT X TH TN, 1 PT Rr PD PD I WS LT X 5B LT TN TN I RI X PT X PD X PD X GREEN 20,0 0 0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 15.0 48.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0,0 0,0 YELLOW 4.0 4.0 0.0 0,0 .. 1. wwwr_.i1... 1.� .. .{ wr.. �Y.._ w.. lrw :vu:1....w.:{r_..___rL...:�rw LEVEL Of SERVICE LANE GRP, VI /C G/C DELAY LOS APP, DELAY APP. LOS NO L 0.992 0,221 61,7 F P 1.371 0.221 ND L 0.998 0.165 70,3 23,3 C T 0.557 0.716 4.5 SR, T 0.677 0,516 11.7 11, D 0.153 0,516 71] INTERSECTION, Delay - * (spc /veh) V/C - 0,906 LOS 4 • 1985 HCh U1;SIGNALIIED INTERSECTIONS Page -1 *t* * * * * ** ** * ** :* ** **** ** ** ** * * * * * * * ** ESE *** * *** ** ** * *h *** *** IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET° .. , .. , . , , x 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR,.. till S' AREAPOPULATION.. Nt.112641t1,111 1111N.V.12411[Alltil 150000 NAME OF THE EAST /WEST STREET,, OAK ST NAME OF THE NORTH /SOUTH STREET,......,...„,,,, HALL BLVD NAME OF THE ANALYST" R,,,1 IS, IiR ,1,,, 111 DW DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm /Udiyy),,,.,.v..., „ .I,.r 09/07/50 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED,.,,,,. R7 Rttl 1I I.1 f. 1., 1.1, R, 1.1 a'I PM. PEAK OTHER INFORMATION: TOTAL TRAFFICC INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE! 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTIONS NORTH /SOUTH CONT ROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN • TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB 11B NB SB LEFT 22 30 38 50 THRU 35 22 485 470 RIGHT 110 8 0 30 10 NUMBER or LANES AND LANE USAGE EE WP N8 8'0 ;�... 4 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page -2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELEF:ATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TARNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 L0 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 S0 20 P SOUTHBOUND 0,00 90 20 P VEHICLE COMPOSITION EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL GAPS SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV' S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL ( Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS WB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 ELI 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 MAJOR LEFTS SE 5.60 5.60 0,00 5.60 NB 5,60 5.60 0.00 5,60 MINOR THROUGHS WB 6.80 6,80 0.00 6.80 ED 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.80 MINOR; LEFTS WE 7.80 7.80 0400 7.20 E8 7.00 7.22 0.00 7,20 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -IF - SEPVICE Page -3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) r c - v p{ SH R SH MINOR STREET NS LEFT 37 89 54 54 17 E THROUGH 27 143 128 128 ;f 101. > D RIGHT 7" ; 804 S`pi4 'r' 33 884 2331 731 rC A MINOR STREET 39 73 73 46 E 141 125 ? 125 83 ( E 023 823 }: 351 `823 f 174 689 )D A NB, LEFT , 46 653 603 Sl? LEFT 61 575 57': [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing]