Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
SDR1991-00015
POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. _ t/ r ,N ,I-J,),,,,,,',,,,, . -.ds',. , ,.x"n•.n. nm•::•J,I mn.Nx h,ud.h.ilw4,41,1=.-iwr,'of.,4,4.1.IfN.''M4�Si.,�i'd,,,. 414,•A•::,∎•∎:Y 97�;•• ' . " d 7'(! i�nl I.yp'+U,' {tttt" W L::+li 4 Y. l1y Ytdf Y •YSl ak G y 1 M:Y.r,i'., 1r,'^x._,iu:,:'•.m$4N.,,,^_",,,,'tll ,tktl,,,pk,F.?(L;,;w„�.ir .1L �.•n�nn.va,v +Fe:, I, n 1342 ''$v 172rtcl Ave• 2s1 ,, 100 tir I 1 I 1 I ,� !1 A .uw .a.n. }+,Ji+..• ,.M,.».4 w !r, xnA..Pn.M.ww, y ..1 ,. .,wx,.-..-,. .,�Y ..,•,,.. r.,.....a.,_.,.,,..,u.d k, .,. ,. +nu._-...44p '"N,,xl".YxlA.iq�>-,a,..-x.Fr 4}.,'..1'J'_.w..F:.r..4.r<LL.,.,..,,.»—r,A 4.e}x,.31,1,,:L«.sal.Ak.+,.r. ek „+ . .'1' . ; Ii Y +y .r r 1 • { 1 J I i I. 'I I 1. ■ ■ 1, I I 1 I I I I I 1 1 r •r p n ;r 1„ ............ r...d•...•w.d .4.,.. ........»w,..> r..li.....e o.„„.»... .. ..L... ...........1......._...........+......+_(..wl.-......I....M......w,n..-A..x..._x.,,x.... .+.+.....a........J._.»..+....:x........._.«.wI.a.i.A.' .»._ 4 rw .,•.h,.....t.. ........ w.........4.. ....x«..n.... .Yw.«....-. ............:f ,, :. ., PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION • FILE NO SDR 91--0015 FILE TITLE: GRECO I SHONKWILER l APPLICANT: John W. Shonkwiler OWNER: Gus & Loraine Greco .l 5750 SW Carman Drive 13425 SW 72nd Ave. • Lake Oswego, OR 97035 Tigard, OR 97223 ,,. REQUEST, ZONE, LOCATION: Applicant requests Site Development Review approval to convert a 1,360 square foot single family residence into professional offices with related site improvements. ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial) LOCATION: 13425 SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 251 ] DC tax,• lot 100) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Professional Commercial NPO NO: 5 NPO CHAIRPERSON: Craig Hopkins PHONE NUMBER: 639-5.823 CHECK ALL WHICH APPLY: ' X STAFF DECISION COMMENTS DUE BACK TO STAFF ON 1991 N COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME 7:30 PLANNING HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME:,7:00 1, m CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME:7:30 ;--: INQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND ATTACHMENTS ` X V'ICINIT,C MAP X LANDSCAPING PLAN X NARRATIVE X ARCHITECTURAL PLAN ! `. X SITE PLAN ' _ OTHER: ,' PREPARE FOR PLANNER APPROVAL: ' X ADVERTISEMENT -- TIGARD TIMES OREGONIAN ,Iw X NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS TO BE MAILED . LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE OF APPLICATION _:____� . NOTICE TO DLCD -- ATTAC ENTS STAFF CONTACT: R,on. Pomeroy 1' CODS; SECTION: 18, 12 0 I ; USE LISTINGS: Civic Use Types: Public agency administrative • ' selMriCe s,, public alc s pport facilities; a Professional and adminiStra . ve serr �s, financial, insurance, and • real estate services, business support services Residential Use • 4, Types: Multiple-family residential units, among others. 1. . . 1. \;.:4 '' , f '.' .' ' . . !TY OF TIGARD ORFAnN s, ., SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION • . CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY s CAS o p `�' ► ` ' - (.Q � OTHER CASE NO'S: / I ',,• RECEIPT NO. 7/'--- APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: / ' a r DATE: /O mo: f/ l • 10 GENERAL INFORMATION Application elements submitted: ; PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION,. . I 3� 4��� rJ� 7Z�a� . AYE . I' (A) Application form' (1), � i.;• T' &A R.b I O E �3 91,2,;2 2.,..3 .�.._�_1 (B) Owner's sipnatur ./written I.• a, TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO. MAP 9 sillaS__4_,. authorization ,. , ':, 1 0.11 .7 (C) Title transfer instrument (1) :`. - SITE SIZE 310 , ? 15 4.'' Lt_, 9 Ac ras ) .....Z(D) Assessor's map (1) ' : PROPERTY OWNER/DEED MOLDER* ids� 2 L! _, ',G ` ,; (E) Plot plan (pre-app checklist) ' • • ADDRESS 1 "3"z..s st,,0 ye', PHONE 4 g -.' °5 7(F) Applicant's statement CITY d ))412,14-) I 6.2, ZIP . 72 . 3 (pre-app checklist) I • •, • APPLICANT* , C) ¢�6�0 _ a:.�_ '� q,. E g _- G4.44 --proper yr-owner and . " ADDRESS 6"76-0 , /2V RP TONE'....6 .....0' / add eas s pig h n 50 feet (-1-)0, " ; , CITY -, ok,„ , g 6 6, 404, ZIP 5, L,i' 01) Filing fee ( "2'6 ) *When the owner and the applicant are different ar'`-- (I) Construction Cost; Est~ima'te-St people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record ) a. • or a leasee in possession with written authorization . DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE: from the owner or an agent of the owner with written / / 7 """ 1/_ .,_..�.. authorization. Ti!',..! owner(s) must sign this r page DECISION DEAD , space n. a�e� two� or FINAL I�DCISI� DEADLINE: . application ��.n. the s tack ,prove ed o submit a written authorization with this, application. COMP. PLAN/ZONE "DESIGNATION:, 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY Y C C r �'! l��ll 1 , "" 1"' ° The owners of record of the subject property request site development ment revs ew approval to 4 N.P.O. umbe r allow s _o'to .....a_.g epti y Approval fate c j 'inal Approval Date:. , Planning Engineering I ' , < R� `r'd 5/81 ' ' G . , I I ' 04 . List any variance, conditional, use sensitive lands, or other land use actions ''to be considered as part of this application: , l N ,,8 pA L ..0`-'e 41 A 4. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments I described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this K• " application. 5. THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above re.uest does not violate arty deed restrictions that may be attached to ,°r posed iz2; ' .12 subset property.' D. If the application is granted the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true, and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this ,w application, may be revoked if it is4 found that, any stctl statements are 1 statem' false. : Da The applicant has read the entire co nt ents o f the application, includin g , the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. DATED this day of .....62.ceter_61.,a___ 19 SIGNATURES of of each owner ( g. husband and wife) of the subject property. P, '',•4, Gus' ri 4fiar fro (KSL:pm/0524P) • r • • r ' • , APPLICANT'S STATEMENT • , REQUEST OF JOHN W. SHOINIK.WILER TO CONVERT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE • INTO PROFESSIONAL OFHCES AT 13425 SW 72ND AVENUE,TIGARD, OREGON A. Summary of Application. 1. Location. The subject property is .90 acres of a lot 310 ' by 136 ' . The property is located at 13425 SW 72nd Avenue, Tigard, • Oregon; and further described as: S.W. 1/4 S.E. 1/4, Section 1, T.2 S. , R. I W. , W.M. , Tax Lot 100 (Map 2 S 11 DC) . 2. Zoning. The subject property is zoned Professional Commercial (C- P) . The subject property abuts commercial to the east and south, medium - high density residential to the north and low density residential to the west. 3. Existing Improvements. The subject property is currently improved by a single family residence (1360 square feet) , a 22 ' by 161 garage, an • 8 ' by 10 ' tool shed, and a 11' x 13 ' well house. The single family residenCe is currently served by a fully operating septic tank - drain field, and a domestic water well. The site has also been planted with 17 mature trees that should qualify as "street trees" under the city' s ordinance. Those trees are specifically identified on the landscape plan and attached chart. Access to the property is currently from 72nd Avenue near the corner of S.W. Fir and 72nd Avenue. 4. Proposed Professional Office. The applicant is proposing converting the existing single family residence into a professional office for attorneys. : The applicant intends to maintain professional offices in the converted residence for approxiiiately five to ten years. Thereafter, the applicant intends to proceed with development ' of the entire . 9 acre parcel for a larger office structure or office complex. The applicant requests that for the period of • time that the residence i used as an office building that the , current septic tank . drain field and domP5tic water well be allowed to continue serving the building, Applicant requests that as a condition of approval of this application that c applicant will then be required to hookup to the cityts sanitary sewer and water at the time that the entire .9 acre parcel is developed or at ten years (which over first occurs) . 1 APPLICANT'S STATEMENT (JWs10o8.1,10 • , . , m:c....,......».... ..a......:.. ..::a.,._... ,..,._..,.,..,w.b.._ e.'y.u,,,,,.i y.Y......M.W,.......,-.....,.._,..--.,.I.i,...«i:,,:.......y...,._..„_......;,'..a..,........,....a_..»a,.,..........ra..�_. . ,.... ...,+:+'1 • The applicant would also be required to hook-up to public sewer and water in the event these current facilities fail or become inadequate. When the applicant seeks development of the entire .9 acre parcel for offices within the next five to ten years, the E applicant intends to demolish or remove all the existing structures on the property (residence, garage, tool shed and well) ,� Tapplicant also intends to abandon the current septic tank - drain field and private water systems on the ' property at that time. This application for conversion of the residence to an office also includes a request for a parking lot for six (6) parking stalls (including one 8. 5 ' by 181 compact space space and one 101 by 18 ' handicap space) . The parking " lot would be approximately 2, 136 square feet in size with an •' entrance apron of approximately 384 square feet. The applicant is also proposing placement of street trees `• A along three sides of the property (72nd, 74th and S.W. Fir) Landscaping surrounds and screens the parking lot and portions of the proposed office structure. An additional planter box {' for maple trees is proposed for the front of the garage to screen that structure. 5. Proposed Conditions cif A,pproya,l. ' • Due to the applicant intending to use the converted (, ' residence for an office only for the next five to ten years, the applicant is requesting that several development r requirements be postponed until the entire property is presented for development or ten years from the approval roval of this application (which ever first occurs) . The following ate the app licant's proposed items that wou ld be deferred: a. A requirement o1 a sidewalk alo .g S.W. Fir. �,. • :r Currently, S.W. Fir is already served by a sidewalk (' on the north side of the street. S.W. Fir is not a through street and dead ends at Tax Lot 350.1. Due to the 'Y current development on the properties surrounding this section i ( i 1 of S.W. Fir, �.t is not expected that additional ' significant traffic will be generated for the street in the next five to ten years. In addition,•� - � � �' � � 74th Avenue has not been improved and is only a street cut at the west end of the subject property. Currently only one ` drive-way access, FsSe�� (l residence p e� is using a short ���portion of ��� Avenue' • right of way for their drsve�= y � ��ia111r� � I� � �� : the existing sidewalk along S.W. Fir appears to adequate ', for the pedestrian .needs of this portion of the street. The proposed resident conversion to office is at the • western portion of the property,,. Xt seems more a ` , y STATEMENT I I , ...J................I .._.F...•,i•.,,t.....:+.4§'.:a.l...+-....-^...J......._...._...!«. ,-..-....u.,.,,....,, n.+.a.... _.....,.......,,...«...,sy.;.... :.;..- i....µ....,..,..+..,J,.,.-.1....+».r.^,.V.....,.-.r...»,.„,... nr......-«.w^ .,....�«.,»».,..-,.:+:.«a:...-..-..:,.Ar...-:i,;.1....1i.._.t+..,a,...:..,.....«..:w+..l.:..r+:,-..I...iJ;,x' ........s...._.....#l++-..+.:....»i.u1...w:.:,L .:.+,. appropriate to install sidewalks when the entire property is developed; rather than at this time when over two- , thirds of the property will remain 'undeveloped. . b. The one-half street a rorem.emt to 74th t Avenue. 74th Avenue is located at the western end of the property which is in the portion that will remain undeveloped for the next five to ten years. Presently, 74th Avenue is not improved between S.W. F.ir and. Cherry Drive to the south. This right-of-way is presently used as lawn areas for the residences abutting the right--of- way. Only; a short entrance area off S.W. Fir has been leading as an opening for drive-way 1 �.Y� roved,��and acts a g p P g back to one of the residences adjacent to the right-of- ' " way. There apparently are no current or proposed development plans for any of the vacant interior lots abutting this portion of 74th Avenue. The applicant r , o ses t�at tY �5 st street improvement m�nt b P deferred and a s a condition of approval, the applicant with execute a non -remonstrance agreement which >waives the property owner's right to remonstrance against the formation of the local improvement district to improve 74th Avenue. C. Hook-up to sanitary sewer. The applicant proposes that the residence converted office be allowed to continue on the existing septic tank and subsurface drain field. The applicant would be required to hook-up to the city's sanitary sewer upon application for further development of the parcel or ten years or upon failure of the system (which ever first ). occurs) . Applicant understands that as a further condition of approval, the.applicant would be required to obtain certification from Washington County regarding the adequacy of the existing septic tank and sub-service drain field. for the proposed office use. In the event , th at certification from Washin gg ton County cannot be obtained, then applicant would be required to hook-up to • sanitary sewer prior to occupancy. • d. Hook-Up t o p ublic d omestic water. • . '' The current residence is being served by a private well. As the up-hill land uses abutting the site are currently hooked up to sanitary sewer, it does not appear that there is any likely contaminating f ing source for the '. ecisting well.. The well has continuously passed health ' . inspection requested pa y landowner.ertion �r±s uestet� 'and paid '.for. b� the er; As ' with the sanitary sewer, the applicant is requesting that he be allowed to remain, on the private water source until 3 - APPLICANT'S STATEMENT CJW8100EL1JJ 4 ' hr / ! • • 1• ,1•,.i,.r..,.+.t„ .,..,...1':",t«,L.._.4-,.,..i.,--,, „».—,,,,,..,A-..»,..,..,a.t.-„,-.... ,-.<4,-,.,,,,. ...,r.._r.,.,.,r.,..........e-«.....d...m1.:.,..,.,•,....,....,..„_..._r.,.—,.....,.1..+,..,■„...-.. _..4,......:,.,,,.,...e.-,:..„.,,.,.i«,,r,,..,,,....,...a..r......,-.. -w..1.,,,,,_.,>..�..:,t.+,Ca....,,r..nc. r......«.:xw.......i..!_..,......,...' '! , w+ redevelopment of the property,! a failed system, or ten r ever•. years (which e "first occurs) . Again, if. the system Y � g Y becomes inadequate for any reason, the applicant would r. immediately hook-up to public water.e.. the lot. , Paving of t'�'Y parking �. The applicant proposes covering the parking lot with gravel. If the city will not accept the applicant's reasons for seeking to !gravel the parking lot, the applicant will pave the 'parking lot with asphalt or concrete. The applicant seeks to surface the parking lot with gravel for the temporary period of time until the , property is fully developed in five to ten years. In addition, the graveling of, the parking lot would be permeable to storm water and allow the percolation of the water into the soils below. This graveling of the parking lot should substantially eid or eliminate concerns about storm `water rung-off from the resident-- office conversion. If the parking lot is paved with ; .. asphalt or concrete at this time;, it would effectively , hinder or prevent using this area for landscaping when t r the whole property is developed. �, r f. Set-back requirements, for the garage The existing garage is 18 feet south of the north , . '' ,,e` boundary line of the property. As this parcel is ;� adjacent to a multi-family residential zone,' the garage is subject to a 20 foot set-back. i= ,� The applicant requests that the requirements for the i set-back of the garage be postponed until the entire e property is developed or ten years (which ever first J':',;'.:, occurs) . The applicant intends to use the garage for ' r. storage of materials. In support of the request, the applicant points out that the garage is actually 25 feet .. ) . `• 9 inches from the curb line of S.W. Fit. The garage is, I • screened by two apple trees (both exceeding two feet in r circuPference),, a proposed planter across the front of the garage (facings 72nd Avenue and intended to be planted , with maple trees) , and the extension of the parking lot A screening which will inclUde plantings of rhododendrons at this location. Finally, the location of the garage is ' not inconsistent With other out-buildings (a tool shed • and well house) that are located in this proximity, but are well beyond the 20 foot set-back. When the entire ,}: p property is developed in five to ten years, all four 'm structures including the garage, will be removed or ' • ' ti 4 APPLICANT'S STATEMENT . 6JWS'1Oa8.1JJ) ". • .. i ,I ', ,. r .a w M k ...-„iw:-,I r.r.l-r.a.,.-«u....,r..A n,«.R-J...1ul..F+.....,.,,....,m..r,Lr,.,.,,-.r.rnM..+-r_r.-....+ln-.•.wx.U.-,nn.....4trl.r..+re..K_wY.,.wla.w.+ti.i+rL':.J.r!-«eN-1Y4..'.r.4«.,w'.I.t..?.:.ww'4..l::rn'1.4i1=.nu-i=µ:nF».,.;.G • ” ' demolished. B'd Application Reggiggamtg. 1. Zoning District Dimensional Requirements. '.r r The subject property is 42, 160 square feet. This far ' exceeds the minimum lot size requirement of 6, 000 square feet. Originally, applicant was considering a partition for reasons related to financing. It appears at this time that such a partition would not be necessary. , • The 136 foot width of the lot far exceeds the 50 foot . mini mum lot width. All s t-back requirements are satisfied ed . with the exception of the garage. Applicant is requesting that as a condition of approval, the garage be allowed to remain at its present location until the entire property is ; developed or ten years (which ever first occurs) . A(S) (f) above, identifies the reasons applicant is making this request. • , The maximum site coverage including sidewalk along 72nd is less than 5,200 square feet or less than 15% of the site. As a remainder of the property is landscaping or natural vegetation, the 20% requirement is substantially exceeded. The proposed office conversion will merely add a handicap ':, access entrance porch-ramp along the front of the structure, and rearrangement of doors and some walls internally. The current height of the building (approximately 22 feet) will / o II � not be changed. Thus, the maximum building height of 45 feet r , will not be exceeded. , A Access, Parking ' The proposed office conversion is a total of 1, 360 square g feet. Applying the parking standard of one ,space per 350 square feet,' the site would be entitled to ga minimum of 3. 88 or 4 parking spaces.aces a groupings The applicant �. . cep in two �� applaFcant is proposing. parking g p � ini� 6 pa p g p gs o f three stalls each. In front of the office will be three standard stalls of 9 foot by 18 foot dimensions. In front of the garage area will be the three stalls consisting of one handicap parking space (10 foot by 18 feet) , one o standard parkin g stall. and one compact parking I'. stall (81 feet by 18 feet) . Applicant is aware that the o compact stall maybe shorter, but it is felt that 'the 18 foot length would be more consistent with ��this deign n p atter�n'. � � � , I to between the proposed A bicycle rack i, � be located ; 5 APPLI CANT r S STATEMtNT (Jt1s1 OO8.1 JJ) r1, I r 9 M , ' :.'. 4 'I ,. .. _,4;• .. .w '.I' .e l.. �'•,' A' �. , •.. ': . .. .. r .. .. . .. ,•fir•: .. .�., { ..,.._,n ...r.... ,,.,y,i,,... ........,,,,.M,• ..�. ,,,«..__.r.,,. ....rrw.,......._...,. ..,...a.: .....,xnk ..a-.- ......b,.:k,..,a.,.._dd :.,..av:.,_.._,.«..-..,.M.6,.M�-+..a..,;i..:-J.«�.,,....,....., ..:.L.,wu,»..,.w.r3.«.r„.„e1..: _...,,, ,.---_.r...ld..•n,_+.•......,..... ...aI office and th e existing Stn g g ar a e near the existin g side walk. r .r The parking lot will have one access from S.W. Fir (with a 24 foot access width) Pedestrian a ccess will be from a side e wa lk parallelling 72nd Avenue and connecting to the parking lot. This will provide direct access to the entrance porch-ramp It will f, also provide access to the rear entry to the office. The ! current acCess to the property is from 72nd Avenue, but this 'access will be abandoned and redeveloped as side walk and , I ' landscape area. The applicant's landscape design and �:. development provide for a "clear vision area" in accordance : of S.W. Fir and 72nd . • with the ordinance at thE.. intersection Avenue. On].y low-lying azalea plants and lawn will be grown within this area. 3. LandsCa iYl • • ' a. Street trees. The landscape plan proposes 'continuation of existing street trees and the planting of additional trees along 72nd Avenue, 74th Avenue and I'S.W. Fir. Along these three r streets are 17 existing trees. The predominant trees on , 72nd Avenue are two large English birch trees having circumferences of approximately 5 feet. The applicant proposes planting three more English birch trees to maintain the white bark character of this arrangement. Along S.W. Fir are a mixture of trees including apple, pear, cherry and fir. To complete the street tree , alignment, applicant is proposing to fill unpianted gaps ». with flowering plum trees. Along 74th Avenue there are four large cherry trees existing on the property. The applicant proposes w..intaining these trees and planting existing gaps with i owering plum trees. a . In addition to tl:a street trees, the applicant is r proposing the planting of 'maple trees in a planter box in front of the garage, and maintaining the existing fig and prune tree on the west Side of the office building. �;',., These trees, although not street trees, are part of the plan to adequately screen and buffer the proposed office building on all four Sides. I b. Screening and buffering. Appo licant haS illustrated on page 1 of the the site develop ment p lan Screening and buffering lay-out for : this site. A chart on page 2 of the plan identifies the . � • ' planting ' materials terials to be used in ,,hose locations. 6 APPLICANT'S S STATEMENT J s o08,1JJ �! 1 I I y I I i t ,. i - Ilu....lu. ,4w ..w. ..w..wu,.,......i..F.«..4w.......v....6.«mW.e..- FL .,-4w..:+il.+r•M..nnNw.+. i 1. .•..waS-+.-• -e.AA—r.. m-H. u+- ILi.. r« -n.r ++. w.--..,.J,- a s .V4.... b.iF • I fr Essentially, the applicant intends to plant flowering azaleas and rhododendrons in a continuous series of clusters around all portions of the parking lot and most of the office building. CoT:bined with the existing and street proposed s trees, these two plans complement p each other fairly well. t In addition, the proposed 8 ' by 29 ' porch and ramp serving the front entrance of the office will include a � . planter box, for flower arrangements along the entire length of the porch-ramp (See "floor plan's) A1 l lantin s will be in accordance with the size and spacing requirements set-forth in the city's ordinances. 4. Sign, ' location of one free The applicant is proposing the a • y standing sign along 72nd A venue a pp roximatel y 60o from the •4 corner of 72nd Avenue and S.W. Fir. The proposed sign identifies offices of attorneys and will be less than 8 ° in height and does not exceed 32 square feet per face. The sign drawings are attached to this application E '• Public Facilities. a. Right-of-way dedications. In accordance with the pre--appi ication confe'rence information, the applicant reccgnizes and incorporated in the development plan the dedication of five additional feet to 72nd Avenue, 74th Avenue and S.W. Fir, • b. Street improvements ! • Applicant is proposing that the half street Improvement for 74th Avenue not be required uired at this time. p i � Alternatively, the applicant proposes that the property owner execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrance against the formation of a location improvement district form to improve 74th Avenue. See also applicant's comments under • ' section A(5) (b) The applicant has ;incorporated in the development plan the construction of a sidewalk along 72nd Avenu with accessing to the parking lot and front entrance to the proposed office building. The applicant proposes that the construction of a sidewalk along S.W. Fir ands 4 ' ' 74th Avenue be postponed until applicant seeks to a, 7 APPLICA TT u S STATEMENT CJWs`IOO8;1JJy • • z 1 • . Ire I � i - .. ••«Wr4..n•.}4-..-+,._I.ws,✓.+-.-.ti.a.l..+ 6......'��,...-....w...+ I...ra,.. ....«.J.«„-,....,....a«.H...•t-...�........d..:,..._.._....—.I.,..-,..iii...+.uw...........•aH..✓ ..,.r...a................+....«•...u,• ...A:....r..M.`,..--._........::........-.•Ji:_.«.u«.. ,ta.-....rw..+..w-.....1u.:...,.,..w,.:-�1..-71i:( -.«....,,+.......,a....1:.W..,.:a..a'..J..r—Y......l..0 r,.n•:W.+wdu}...., \, Cr;" ,Ir redevelop the remainder or all of the property or ten years (which ever first occurs) Applicant's reasons for making ,this a condition of approval are identified in section A(5) (a) . C. Sanitary sewers . 'There is an 8 inch r line located in S.W. Fir Street that would serve the property.. There is a ° also a sanitary sewer main in 72nd Avenue. The residence - at the subject property is currently served by a fully functioning and adequately septic tank and subsurface sewage disposal system. Applicant understands from his conversation with Washington County that a nrofessio:ial office usage of the same structure would provide less demand to the septic tank and drain field. In essence, ; the office use could be more easily handled by the drain field than the current residence use. This is due to the r fact that the Large water volume usage of washing ' clothes, dishes and taking baths would be greatly diminished or eliminated by the office use. Applicant, therefore, is proposing t hat the office be allowed to remain on the septic tank and drain field #' if Washington County inspects the facility and certifies that it i8 adequate for the changed use. Applicant 41 proposes, that as a condition of approval that when applicant seeks to redevelop the property in five to ten years the drain field will be abandoned and either existing or future uses will be hooked-up to the public . sewer. See applicant's comments under section A(5) (c) . ' • 6. Storm sewers. Currently, there are storm sewer limes available' in [, • 72nd Avenue, S.W. Fir ands at the entrance o fl "/4tn' Avenue Storm water from the existing residential dwelling roof is now being piped into dry wells on the site. Currently, all storm water is retained on site. y .;' Applicant proposes to gravel the surface of the parking lot area for the proposed office, This is a ' : permeable surface allowing storm water to percolate into t the soil below the parking lot. Applicant proposes that hook-up to storm water sewers would not be necessary. In • the event. the City gravel r• I surface of the parking Staff finds that storm sewer hock-Up ts fa: lot or tY�a otherwise necessary; applicant shall provide Storm sewer hook-up for the parking lot area to the S.W. Fi•r or 72nd �.� Avenue storm sewer. • 8 APPLICANT'S STATEMENT' (JWs10031J0 • • • • JS s./..wu.,....,....;..La..w�� ,.I..�...w..wl.,.,...«.,...,.,.,.. w9a4....1..-,.r< G...;✓i..-,.�.:.h.,._. .a`.uw.t�-«.,..�.w.a.........+s..s....4.. 41 l4., r.w. ..1447.,:.i4,-44.:.,444-4 +14:.444-13...,.n.•••,,r,.aJ:.,,.,x.:....-fix.«-:...r1....:.4.i,m�.aL�Lr;.m.:..;..11;a..:�...-.a..- w,.w...a.1..,_1.4.,,+.1 •i ( n 4 1 •,4' e. Water supply. The site is currently served by a private well, Applicant is proposing the continued use of the private , well for a domestic water supply. Applicant agrees that as a condition of approval the office will hook-up to public water in the event the property is redeveloped, the water source proves inadequate or ten years (which ever first occurs) f. The site is served by the Tualatin Valley Fire and ; Rescue District. Adequate fire hydrants e�rve this area. As there is q hydrants I � no change in the size and, location of the structure on the property, existing service should be adequate. Outdoor lighting. { The applicant is proposing the placement of four ornamental brass lanterns along the 172nd Avenue side of the office structure. The location of the lanterns are identified on the "Floor Plan'' . These lights should provide adequate lighting for crime l prevention " consideration. However, such lighting is localized tole the area immediately around the proposed office, and will not interfere with traffic on 72nd Avenue nor uses on. • neighboring properties. In addition, the existing residential structure has an outdoor spotlight located at the peak of the roof on the north side of the structure. This light would cover the 25 by 25 foot parking lot area , ,`. , g immediately east of the existing garage. h Above grOund utilities. Currently, above ground electricity, is provided to the site from a pole located along S.W. Fir. Applicant proposes maintaining this same electrical service to the office structure. When the entire property is , . redeveloped within five to ten years, applicant would be providing Underground electrical s e vice to the newer structure st ructure at tha time I I I I , 5 APPLICANT'S STATEMENT rya. JJ I f J 1 t JS10 7 „ I I . I a I I r� t W ..,:.- ' n.,w..nn4.:v,I.u.—w n....0 rH.+.... ,. ....,..i............. rW..«,..r.. ..V.h-». .«....... ....,....-......ac.w F.nl a..� w......... i ,.. .t x....,i ,..y.t «.u, .-.x A. x �. ....n,. ...._.-,.. .f.., ,..,4........«. ..4w ,.,... i-,I,»LC.:. ., x..r _ ....._,.,w..N.i.,...4,..-...i+,w:...,....a.... .w[..,r..... - ... «..- . • !a N n CITY O TIGARD , L' PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES • DATE: (( 1 APPLICANT: U' 14 N) tk->Pi 0 , ILL:a: AGENT• ..� ', Phone: ', Phone: PROPERTY ?CATION „ , t° t ADDRESS: m I t r, G - ' ,-., TAX MAP & TAX LOT: IN ,• �✓ /� NECESSARY A pPLIC:A7�':s ON(S)= Ck Al n ic..) jai L. .. _ '' ,r ci ' { C a.6 PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: ri� d , 7 ±i fi• Ar f KT .Y , . . / F e P T.›,„CtMPNS3T� PLAN �° ., � : ZONING DESIGNATION: -, 0 --_IE .-------- - , _______ . . .. 5- ,0-,7 NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING JRGANIZATION # CHAIRPERSON: ... 1c: _,: }6'°,.. ! ;ro PHONE: ,-5, ���;i_ 2) ri • . ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS n v' , Minimum lot size: 60'•x'sq. ft. Minimum lot width: ..!A-,:',.) ft. Setbacks: front- _�, ft. side-- 0 ft., rear--i ) ft. garage- X. , ft. corner. k ft. from both streets. Maximum site coverage: .4L% ' • Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: AO Maximum btzildirg i'ight: _qS," ,ft. ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS ' Minimum. lot frontage: 2E 2 .:'aet �tx:less lot is created through g the minor artition process. Lots created as 9 land P P part of a partition amdst have a : .• miniMpm of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15 foot wide access • s ea semeaxt Maximum lot depth to width ratio of 2.5 to 1, ! '' SPECIAL SEPMAC1"S 1- Streets, ft. from centerline of : 1 Established areas ft. from _ tower intensity zones: ft., along the site'8 _... boundary i, ,.� Ar}�l.ag lot: 10 ft. side ,yap�0 528�q ft. in si = ft:: setback from side "� , dce s sor structures: u . ze 5 ..• etb fro e►d ' and rear lot lines ± Accessory 'structured: up to 1000, sq. ft. (where allowed) See 1 applicable Zoning district setbacks ,u Zero lot line lot 0:. minimus 10 foot Separation a�a� n etwee� buildings Malt3 �fam31 y resident i a l building separation. See Cods Section 18.96.030 } ' page 1 r s a n • , "l +� , n t .rte....«.. .aw..< ....,,...v ;. .. r., .. _ ._,.tb_*rt........a...✓«w...n:.1-l..w....u.A«.nn...,....,l+-t,w,. o • r A W SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS Flag Lots: Maximum' height of 1-1/2 stories or 25 ft., whichever is less in most zones; 2-1/2 stories or 35 ft. in R-7, R-12, R-25 or R-40 zones if standards of Code Section 18.98.030(B) are met. " Building. Height Exceptions ;(Code Section,18.98.020): Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built•to a height of 75 feet provided: 1. A minimum FAR, (building floor area to site area ratio) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; 2. All actual building setbacks will be at least 1/2 the building's height; ar,d 3. The structure will not abut a residential zone district. RE IDENTIAL DENSITY CALCULATION Community Development Code Cha t r 13.92 specifies that the net ° sidential unite allowed on a paitcicular site may be calculated by d e riding the net area of the develop rle area by the minimum number of squ re feet required per dwelling unit n the applicable •zoning district. " Ne,tevelopment area is calculated by \ubtracting the following land area(s) from the g ross site area: i All sensitive lands areas land within the 100 year floodplain slopes exceeding 25 ` drainageways 2. Ind dedicated for park purposes 3' y Pulb �c �. right-of-�wa Y dedication 4. All yand provided for private streets (includes accessways through parking areas) \ The City of Tigard a .' ows a residential density transfer of up to 25% of the units that Could Otherwise have been 'developed on sensitive lands , areas listed in (1) abbye to the developable: portion of, the site in ,. adcordatnce with Code Section 18.92.030. It is the responsibility of the applicant for a residential development application to provide a detailed calculation for permitted residential density and density transfer. x c„) RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SOLAR ACCESS REQUIREMENTS ".,,Effective May 1, 1991 all subdivision and minor partiti.:414 are subject to, solar access requirements which state `that 80% of all lots developed .must be solar-oriented.nted. The char�aoteristics`Hof a solar-oriented' :�a�,ar- � lot are high ,. tetiime'sun striking the sotui• walls and roofs of the house, " house orientation maximizing south window area, and a south-sloping roof area. To achieves this, one may utilize the following: 1. Bas requirement; err st' of nor to , Basic re rem�ent. Design a lot with at lea' 90 feet north-South Protected orientation within 30 degrees lot diin�neio�t and an orb. r �g� south;e ath n e reel of s 2g � rotected Solar Building Line: The solar have azn�.ni.mu�t� of a)' building line��Cizu � be oriented within''s30 degrees of south, b)`� f 70 feet between it and the.biddle of the lot to the eolith, c) have a Minimum of 45 feet between it and the northernmost buildable,boundary of the lot on which the buictig line is located. 1'he first option 3 PerforMaioe Optional. p n requires the 'Mouse to be oriented witnin 30 ground flc►or�south wall, east-West ro�ected Eris shade. The at least' 00t of the g° p s_ e. The secon i Page 2 i VI i ,„ , M1 , • ^r,I II • ( ki, • , option requires at least 32% of the glass and 500 square feet of the roof area to face south and be protected from shade. site from the solar accesr� �re �.rement can partial exam tlon of a qu • Total or p p I, be for the following reasons: i 4 1. East, west or ',north slopes steeper than 20%.„ 2. Off-site shade souroes (structures, vegetation, topography). 3. on--site shade sources (vegetation). / Adjustments allowing reduction of the 80% solar lot design requirement can . be for the„ ollowing reasons.: }' 1. Reduced density or an increased Cost of at least five percent due to. - east, west or north slope greater than 10%, - significant natural featuie, - existing road or lotting pattern, •- public easement or right-of-ways ' h 2. Reduction in important/development amenities. 3. Pre-existing shade (vegetation) . Maps and text sufficient to show the development complies with the solar desi gn standard, except' for lots for which an exemption or adjustment is required, including all of the following items: .* 1. The north--soaith lot dimension and front lot line orientation of each proposed lot. 2. Protected,' solar building lines and relevant building site , restrictions, if applicable. N�° 3. For the''purpose of identifying, trees exempt from Section F, a map showing existing trees at least 30 feet tall and over 6 inches i, diamAer at a point 4 feet above grade, including'' their height .„ '() diaieeter and species, and stating that they are to'be'retained and are exempt. private restrictions relating to*solar access. 4. c�bpzes of all p � If airii exemption or adjustment is requested, maps/and text sufficient to sshowr that given lots or areas in the development comply with the standards `!^. for such an exemption or adjustment shall be sbmitted« r`"� r` fir, r,�ti ' .. ' / RESIDENTIAL DENSITY TRANSITION Regardless of t he allowed housing density in n a ton g � c , any property within 100 feet of a desi gnat d est ablished axrashall not be developed t a density greater t an125 p ercent �©f the maximum Comprehensive Plan desi gZaticn (not oY1n g) of the adjacent parcel. r , j ° r ACCESS p ng r yp ,t w2 4,0 pARRgI�Required automobile arks for this.t e of use: ' Secondary use required parking: 25% of required spaces May be designated compact-only spaces Standard parking spade dimensions: 9 ft. X 18 ft. Com act parking space dimensions: 8.5 ft. P da.mens �' X 15 ft. Handicapped parking: All parkin areas providing in excess of five w n •� parking p required automobile parking spades shall provide appropriately to vated and e esig H.a.t- ed handicapped parking sp..ace s.. the Minimum number of handicapped Page 3 Ie`0.C t: a ti P • • parking spaces to be provided and parking space size are mandated by the Oregon Revised Statutes (see handout). A handicapped parking apace symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be provided. Bicycle racks are required for civic uses, non-residential uses, commercial uses, and industrial uses providing 15 or more automobile parking spaces. Bicycle parking must be provided at a ratio of one • bicycle rack space per 15 auto parking spaces. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic. The Planning Division ' can provide specifications for approved bicycle rack types. • All parking areas and driveways must be P aved. I , D - Ise queuing area=. . • Minimum number of accesses: 4 Minimum, access width. � Maximum access 'width: r 1.- ,) .41" e -k Pedestrian access must be provided between building entrances and parking areas, outdoor common areas, and public sidewalks and streets. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses, see Community Development Code Chapters 18.106 and 18.108. P.ra67.R\. q��y � VISION SIViq Ci.i\EA ....,y. The City requires that clear vision be maintained between three and eight h t feet above grade at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road £ntereections in specified clear vision areas: The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting Street's functional 1.assification. LANDSCAPING Street trees are required for all developments fronting on a public or private street or a driveway more than 100 feet in length. Street .`,rees property within six either � within� 'the public right-of-way Stx-eet trees must be placed eit pr pe yx feet of the right -of-way boundary. must ` ' have a ninimtun caliper of two inches at four feet above grade. Street r J trees ehou ld be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart de.,pe' tree size. PUrther info rmation on regulations affecting street trees and o li€t ri recommended mend ed street treed may be obtained from the Planning Division- , � , A minitut of one tree per parking p must be planted in • around parking areas in order to prove spaces canopy effect. Landscaped s i ' parking provide a ca peck ' , screening of parking areas from views from public rights-of-way -. � must be , provided., Page 4' i h • • ...i•r4._.:r...»�7W..m1�-,«-�...._..u.+...1,w.hl.Y�„f+.:J,....».M.,w—..CJA.i:.-1.n..Frr.w.4irl..:1 i1..... A::..:sJ..u....,o,..+-.-...,z....iu:.»-..h..:.:...i.,...u..;is1:.•..wu..:.li.V....!.:�.1.:wa.�..In..:-iN.tw;4.A.,J..,.4.r..lyv1....«..:F..:.....«n..,.n.rxl..r��;....,.:,w A;;Wataa...l,M.....A�',n..r»...,..n A4.,A.A...u.. i AA... .«.,,.A:..soui..=YJ.-«•': • BUFFERING AND SCREENING In order to increase privacy and to reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts between adjacent developments, especially°between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas l'along Certain site '• perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the. Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs. Site obscuring screens or fences are also required in some cases, and often are advisable even if not required. . Required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and sidewalks. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in Code Chapter 18.100 and the Planning Division bulletin on landscaping and buffering. Required buffer widths applicable to your propp.sal area: . f . along north boundary .�-�'" ft. along east r" y b - _ ft. along south laounda_Y ft. along,we boundary In addition' sIgh6-obscuring screening is required along , Gt ' I1.G.�_ ( SIGNS Permits must be obtained before erecting any sign in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for. Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign ropo al is reviewed as part of a development a Z'.cationP .0 �!k. k .F € . SENSITIVE LANDS et _, °✓ • ADDITIONAL PLANNING CONCERNS OR COMMENTS t\s,\O r . Page 5 4 ,.....,»-.a..,,..w.,:-_...,_. .,. •. w . _, - _ „, ..,. .,,,.,...• ..,,.• ...ww.w.:.ur.......,:a,:•....... i-.,,».,rY,u...:,..:..y,,:c.iw,,.;.>.. .,... _ ., ...,w� • • • PROCEDURE r i __„ Administrative staff review. ' Public hearing before the land use hearings officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. 4 ' Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. ' n Another public hearing is held by the City Council. All applications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff member at • the Community Development Department counter at City Hall. Applications submitted by mail or dropped of at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications submitted after 4:30 P.M. on Thursday will be batched for processing with the following weeks . applications for processing. No applications will be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other days. • Maps submitted with an application shall be folded in advance to 8.5 by 11 inches, One 8.5 inch by 11 inch map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. The Planning Division and Engineering Division will do a preliminary , review of the application and will determine whether, an application is complete within 10 days of submittal. ,,Staff will notify an applicant if additional information or copies of the submitted materials are needed. • 1 The administrative decision/public hearing typically will occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as complete by the Planning 'Division. Applications involving difficult issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to l, review. Written decisions are issued within 10 days of the hearing. A 10 day appeal period follows all, decisions. Ana pp sa l o..n t his matter would be heard by the ,,. i A 'V Vt 6 GA. e,W j S i., . ' A basic flow diagram illustrating the review process is available from the Planning Division. iht in pre-.application' conference and the notes of the conference are int ended to fora the prospective applicant of the primary Community Code requirements applicable ectovdeV particular Development elo ent of a site and to allow the staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities The pp i✓ and Constraints affecting development of the site. conference and notes cannot Cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that sh ould apply development to the site plan. Failure of the staff to provide any information required b y the Core shall not constitute a w aiver of the applicable plcal a requirements. It recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Co de or ask any questions of ,City staff relative to • i Co de re items nts P riox to submitting a n application. Another ,pre-application conference is required if an application is to be submitted more than Oix months after this pre-application conferences unless the second conference is deemed unnecessary by the Planning Divi9ion. PREPARED BV: ER( . ""' "1:;. PLANNING DI ISbON PHONt: 639-41/1 r I } Page 6 • r�' _ .,_, .'...,.v=r....r.L:....M..w...--......,... i... ...,_.n,.....n.....,J.wn..,.i.wM,+,-.....,..ay.-,.,w,«,... .,»...n.. ,...w,J....»,,.41r.-m.r.,r....w..,S...4».•...�,.,.e--.X ,.:..,..-n4.n,,.n�..1.'Wa..r:..:J.,4.�..-+.M.:.-...a-.4.+: ti......Y.-...f,_... ,.w.i....:n.:NU.Au. • • PUBLIC FACILITIES The purpose of the pre-application conference is to: (i) identify applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions; (i:.) to provide City staff an opportunity to comment on specific concerns; and (iii) to review the application review process with the applicant • including identifying who will be the final decision maker for the application. The extent of public improvements and dedications to be :�; required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and approved by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to , the decision maker by City staff until all commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the ti application. '? The following comments are a projection of public • improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of • development approval for your projects Ptiight w of- ay dedication: The City of Tigard 'requires that land area be dedicated to the public to increase abutting public rights-of--way to the ultimate functional street classification rights-of.-way width specified by the Community Development Code. Approval, of a development application for this site will reque dedication of right-of-way .- 4 irr`4 41,/,0 - , t, .,� ._:4•,.. .. .,,.mr,-, ,feet=.fr,rom<r,.-ce.n-te. line. , • Street improvements: 1. L street improvements will be necessary along `" "" w 2. "'' -etteeb, improvements will be necessary along ' t U ad ``" 1v , 34, Needed' street 'improvements will include 1 / feet of pavement from centerline, curb and gutters, storm sewers, a five-foot wide sidewalk, .g two year ' necessary street signs; streetl.t hts, and a tw streetl fight i.ng fee. ; p r "b In some cases whore street improvements or other necessary public k improvements tl ractical, rov'ements° m � y practical, the street improvements may be � are ,not Curren L,, y " deferred. In these cases, as a condition of development approval, the . v r 1`` ?� property owner(s) mtst execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against nst the formation of a local ov I improvement district, formed to,improve 7174111 2. Pedestrianwways/bikeways: „� . 1 ± �., • Sa ni ta x� ge w, e" The l.a s e st: s�ni._�t sewer �o p roe p s t is ..an 6 �inch line loc ated at The proposed e d 4 vLi tx lP meri 'nhst be connected to a sanitary sewer. tt i ,hevel er4 eepersabit; y t62t6nd thw S761er a lon g the pro posed development site's i to m� sewer '..i.m roveme.ntS:„ v INA ",.',„.(L,.„-.^4,4 ! + ,r� i 1 3 Page , �R} r yp"� y '`.+d. L'14K ��,I'tra'��'('f'" '" �"�' " �M,iA W` 0..a% +� .+'ry • '" R s a nn /I, - ")�� � '�+� .fir 9`- A �l r u �I , '�.,, 1., �ry����u M � W ��FF �rr, Y ! k j i1 J� !� �n -.a a .. a.+' /id,/ .�4�'`,1(.. d Pet ,i R�e y� t 4 f 4 k Ui 14. b, r r d, , r ! 4074‘,/ , , toq tat t y thl d's will he tee t4 cfd;„, n • • Water Supply:, The ` 4041 ek ` t& Va d V - Water District (Phone: a,5. ''35. d ) provides public water service in the area of this site. The District should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your ° proposed development. Fire Protection; Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene Birchill, 645-8533) provides fire protection services within the. City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the ' adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Other Agency Permits: __ TRAFFIC IM LZT FEES In August, 1990, the Washington County Board of Commissioners adopted the • county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) Ordinance and referred the measure to • the Washington County voters. In September, 1990, the Washington County , electorate overwhelmingly approved expanding the TIF program throughout all jurisdictions within the county. This action placed into effect an increased street development fee on all new development in Washington County. The City of Tigard has adopted the county's program. The City Traffic Impact Fee program will collect fees from new development based on the development's 'projected impact on the transportation system. Developing properties will be required to pay based on the number of trips they are projected to generated The T/F is calculated based on type of size user, c .� of project,ect, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall. � g g Y be calculated at time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be` allowed to be deferred until issuance of occupancy permit. Deferral of payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. STORMWATER LTAT sI TY FEES The Unified Sewerage Agency has established an the City has agreed to enforce, Resolution No 90-43, Surface Water Management Regulations, requiring the construction of on•-site water quality facilities or fees in lieu of their construction. The resolution requires that ,a fee and/or construction of a water quality facility be built. The fee is based on the amount of impervious surface; for every 2640 square feet or portion thereof, the fee shall be $375.00. The City of Tigard determines if a fee or facility Shall be built. r STREET OPENING P E12kd.I'I' public way shall commence Until the applicant No work within a pLblic riglit-of- has obtained a street opening permit from the Engineering Department. r FINISHED FOR ELEVATIONS , On all pro jests that require a grading plan the applicant shall submit • with the grading,r plan a typicalfltha plan ag sh ' ll h the elevations of four corners of that plan along W ith elevations at the corner of eadh lot PREPARED BY } .. ENGINEERING DIVISION PHONE: 639-4171 67O:FREAPP.MS S.` ?age 0 • sy,a ,a ...t .a,•.w �..,.i.»..,w...,»:.1......:,..,....- s:........,.,w:;»._...w«.,._ .u......, .,.._ .wx.,...w..,. .wa,....._....i;.w4w,..ia;:. „_a._....,« ..».,...,»ar..:.2;.:,_�c......:t...,...«„«-.:,...',.-.:rA-...«.:»,...,,u,;..-u..w-:t'-:.ti.w«•...'.a..:' .,...'«..0»..... .,. .wML»...::MI.'.. 1 y Staff i,iO C•B> Date 7-1pn • CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST The items on the checklist below are required for the successful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be brought • and submitted with all other materials it the time you submit your application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call Planning at 539 -4171 . • ITEMS TO BE ' BASIC MATERIALS INCLUDED: ; A) Application form (1 copy) C B) Owner's signature/written authorization C C) Title transfer instrument C "" D) Assessor's map E) Plot or site plan C F) Applicant's statement C ( 4:i —o•.wwpoepe • y- owneps—,&—tddre,s.s•e.s -w.i. •1 ► 451 • C ]],r (H) Filing fee ($see •,�a�w ,,; [ ' SPECIFIC MATERIALS PECICIC MA TERIALS I I , A) Site Information showing (No, of copies ): C ] 1) Vicinity Map C ] ; 2) Site size S dimensions C ] 1 3) Contour lines (2 ft at 0 .10% or 5 ft for grades > 10%) [ ] 4) Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds [ ] 5) Locations of natural hazard areas including: - a) Floodplain areas [ ] b) Slopes in excess of 25% [ ] c) Unstable ground C ] • d) Areas with high seasonal water table [ ] I • e) Areas With severe soil erosion potential [ ] f) Areas having everely weak foundation soils [ ] 6) Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive ,. Map inventory including a) Wildlife habitats t b) Wetlands [ ] 7) Other site features: a) dock outcroppings' C ] b) Trees with C + caliper measured 4 feet from ground level [ ] 8) Location of existing structures and their uses [ ] 9) Locate nh and type of oh and off—site noise sources L. ] 10) Location of existing utilities and easements C 11) Location of existing dedicated right- of--ways [ ] D Site Development Plan shoWin No. of copies Li: L ]} p g ( p . 1) The proposed site and surrounding properties L�. 2) Contour line intervals [', 3) The location dimensions and names of all: i._ ) r • a) Existing & platted ,r�Lreets & other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining Le properties �. APPLICATION CH1 CKLI$T — Page 1 g � m • - lit • • • • • ,.• ,. ,..a.«-.�a.+tu..._.a..+.L,. ._ .,«, h.,K,,., +«a n..,,.,u...a..-...a.,,tee.,.. wr r b), Proposed streets or other ublic wai s & easements on the site. p . [ a c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed. streets that require future extension L 4) The location and dimension of: a) Entrances and exits on the site [ b) Parking and circulation areas "/1.2, . c) Loading and services areas d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ` e) Outdoor common areas, [� • f) Above ground utilities [ 5) The location dimensions & setback distances l of all: • w a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, , , utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent pr^oper.,.y, wit an 25 /„. feet of the site, e,.(so [ b) Proposed structures, improvements, , "' }' ° utilities and easements on the site [`J �; 6) Storm drainage facilities d4wRertr eam—eand.i b o n s [ 7) Sanitary sewer facilities [►, '/ , 8) The location of areas to be landscaped [ • 9) The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques [ ' 10) The location of mailboxes [ a k • 11) The location of all structures and their orientation [ " 12) Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements [ ] C) Cradiin Plan (No, of copies ) [ The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall • contain the following informations 1) The location and exte nt to which g radi ng will take place indicating general contour lines, slope ratios r and soil stabilization ro owls 'and tiM of ear e proposals, y it is proposed to be done. [ 1 , 2) A statement from a registered eng ineer su pp orted b y data factual substantiating: a a Subsurface exploration ors ta on an d geotechnical • engineering report [ ] 4' b) The validity sanitary of itar y sewer and storm drainage service proposals [ ik ;; c) That all problems will be mitigated and 1 they be mitigated how the will�, e m�. D) Architectural Drawing! (No. of copies .) [ ) The site development plan proposal shall include; r. 1) Floor plans indicating p g th, ) qua . square footage ' �acatxn the - ge of all �' structures proposed for use un—site; and C 2) Typical elevation drawings of each structure, C a E) Landscape ,Plan No of copies ,12) L 1 The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate; 1) Description of the irrigation system where applicable [ ] , 2) Location on and height of„fences, buffers and screenings ngs [' • APPLICATION CHL CKLIST —, Page 2 4 I f rm J ' I i .4-....!;,_,..,,ki.rvw.!.,—„.,,d..ti,i...:1..,,f..,...n.._.»....«.• ,......I'.L' .......r ..... ,....... .......;... _ :.w:.,... :,L.., ..,... ...iw,_L_:.,(..,:.-:tw-. ;..NM».....,.,+..........,..:....,..,w..L;,.2=,-...+.._.....:.t.«'..,.a,;...:..=A.....«t+.:.:..t.+i.-.+i;,.. • 3) Lo b,4ion of terraces, decks, shelter;' play areas jf and common open spaces [ j 4) Location, type size and species of exist,;ng and proposed plant materials. ( The landscape plan shall include a narrative which addresses: 1) Soil conditions. C 3 2) Erosion control measures that will be used. [ 3 F) Sign Drawings Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of the Code as part of Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct the sign. [ G) Traffic _generation estimate [ ] • H) Preliminary partition or lot line adjustment map showing, (No. of Copies ). 1) The owner of the subject parcel [ 2) The owner's authorized agent [ 3) The ,map scale, (20,50,100 or .200 feet=1), inch north arrow and date [4: 4) Description of 'parcel location and boundaries [1,„, � 5) Location, width and names'of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel w� � �j P C 6) Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25 feet of all property lines [a 1 .. 7) Location and width of all water courses [,] 8) Location of any trees with 6" or greater caliper at 4 feet above ground level [►d°" 9) All slopes greater than 25% [ ] 10) Location of existing utilities and utility easements C ;Ii) For major land partition which creates a public street: a) The proposed right-of—way location and width' C 3 b) A scaled cross-section of the proposed street plus any reserve strip C a �' 12) Any applicable deed restrictions [' ] 13) Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable [; ] x) Subdivision Preliminary Plat Maa „and data shpwi:hg(No. of • Copies ): 1) Scale equaling 30,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch . and, limited to one phase per sheet [ 2) The proposed name of the subdivision [ 3) Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets [ ] ; 4) Dames, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner developer, engineer, serve y er, designer, as applicable[ '] 5) Date of application L ] '6) boundary lines of tract to be subdivided 7) Dames, of adjacent subdivision or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of urisubdivided land [ ] 3) Contour lines related to a City—established bench- mark at 2-foot intervals for 0-10% tirades g r e a ter 4• than 10 C APPLICATION 0!-IE'CRLxST — Page 3 • • (4,,,, ' '::' 4' ti. 4, ..: 9) The purpose, location, type and size off- all.of the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision):: C ] dam. a) Public and private right-of-ways and easements L[. ] b) Public and private sar;itary and 'storm sewer lines [ ] '° c) Domestic water mains including fire hydrants [ ] d) Major power telephone transmission lines • 50,000 volts or greater) [ ] w e) Watercourses [ ] f) Deed reservations for parks, open space, pathways . ' and other land encumbrances [ ] 10) Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and. , • •. storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated [ 3 11) Plan of the proposed water distribution system, . showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and ' fire hydrants► [ ] 12) Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasoiable'distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision. [ ] 13) Scaled cross sections of proposed street right--of--way, [ ] ;. 14) The location of all areas subject to inundation or. d stormm water overflow [ ] • 15)' Location, width and direction of flow of all water courses and drainage ways C 3 16) The proposed lot configurations, approximate lot •' ,,,,• dimensions and lot numbers. Where losts are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be , • indicated upon such lots [ ] •17) The location of all trees with a, diameter' 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level, and ' the 'location of proposed tree plantings, if any [ ] 18) The existing uses of the property, including the location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting [ ] 19) Supplemental information including: a) Proposed restrictions Pro osed deed rest ' ctions (if any) [ ]. b) Proof of property ownership C 3 c) A proposed p'.gin for provision of subdivision improvements 20) Existing natural features including rock out- croppings,' wetlands and marsh areas: [ ] " 21) Xf any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application. [ ] i � Other Information ], C , a APPLICATION CH CkLIST -• Page 4 . +^ .....,..k+................_ ._..,..._,,..,,...u.,ll,......,w..,,.lr......+,f ti.,,....,u...,+ .w,,:.,a...,....„.,,«..1a,«,,.....,..,:...w,,a.1:,,.,..y,•.e..........,.rv,.,+w4,n...•..n.,.Y...;»;,2. , H .. - _, /-\J ff�- Iy\y 1 ia1M laVUt� 1 I Vt\.-o.iv.. — „ aa 2T2/f9T3 � o i b 1d{0 N ''9°24 W 290.32 130.3 40 N 89°24 W 41q '21 R �, 3501 3502 `0ow *., a ' S 89°1Q'E' , N .90Ac. ,. E' 3>� 140•r W U O *,,q w ,• r C . z n . .48 Ac. Ei •�� ,» a �+ �.e ... ®�° �W 292.50 !'323 ...'°� 310 «,. 2 .4 ":„:). \`LP J N • , . 3500 200 3a 0 4200 ; . o'. o .46'�C. ,87Ac. en ‘ 40 -,?-:/Q45 4 to MI M to'N .• . w � c M • • ' L_._..'......__'4° N 310 i s• 294.67 ,,j1 tNiT1ArL N M IPO IN T N 176,55 3400 ..0 � u� , .90 Ac. "? .86 Ac. o N 89°15 3.,r . t. NW, CQ GOVT. LOT 4 NI ~2 M oQ 3703 61 M f Y irl Q iD G ,70Ac, O r/rllrli 0 vi I 3o • N 89°241W 296.78 310a o . ,10 • 12 •5 N . ud 3302 400 w so y"`"" 35 Ac. . .:49 Ac. :88 Ac , M Ic 0; 0 ..A A JIIR • `� O t Z fC18 ' f, "78.83 09°2g w 298,84••,w r.lrY.'1r/ri,y.:.+'i,., /'• ".w .7.✓.S+ .3.911�f•r,,,,•rrr„'.rir !/�., ,,,,,,,, , N 8y°24'W 310 a dG • ! � , \`�r•i ,' .r• 'N fjQ°4�Ir . N'i /. / r.. / rr i. �/ �' ° DRIVE 310 a •75 Ac. TERM. GrR.'WIC 2871 S f38°48'fE 310, `�' •. r W 96.26 \ N 09°24'W' 310 N gt 4800, 500 1500 1400 � ��' p a N is ` .ED 4C v �., y .2/Ac,:,?. `3 •i N wi' ' Q'' S i!9°q5'Cr �1 ..' .... n o t4 eV f .,,,,, rnrrn,m r, .,,,,,,,�,rl7 SW Ac m a w O IEwI r . c 2 iN1'TII�,L >m k 4602 +� S POINT :� N ,BS Acr `� o iZ 30 9 '96 96,5'7 50 . .� • M 'i in /.76Ac. 4 255...31. ... •145.34, I99.98 w �' C7 z �. INITIAL 41 v I cc' or_ ,� POINT '� _; N 896241w 310 to ..�: 4'60 4 G ,tie �' z'4�!' ' 3I9,c+E ! z0 2 .'�4 254 00 , l . ,. 3,..... ' ' , , { i r J 4, . N YC' g i / ` E N N , C :..--1 �. 2 a 3 cr=- , x,19 Ac. g I ' I , ': r+. y • , r "' F �' 9 - a 0 1 5_ . _ • _ ...-, . - _ .„.. _ - . . • - . ._ . , , . . . • . . ..... . . _ . . i'• - k _ r _ -' ,: . ■ ..1.- : - . i - _17-?-..•0 e r•-...,_:vas _..,.. . 3 15. Mill - 'N'C'N''..... .. ) I ".1 . " The City o - . -- (i.$) r_ _ r, r...... T I G A R D i ,. , 1 L._, _ . _, ,, . t__ :._ . I snR , ! , : . vA: s - I: 1 - -- - I ar - 1 .- , L - i . _ VARNS - _ , - t . - -_ _ _ 1 _ .. i Area , > • . , • ' 1 : - . i) - I" - - .i. • rr_ _ _ • . i t-I - • , FIR - - 1 r,_ L L I "... (,... 7 • r' 1 . - , _.. - I. 11- 1 -t - _.- ' I'N: ISki- -- -a: CIR ‘ ANDIORG. __ -- 1---- ii____________•„_, , .., _ . . , Q .. _ I I Disital tan k may repreze,s— fatten complial by tic City - of Ilyar4 affinity Cetira— .* F.-1—FR - \ -- - -- 1 1 • _ 1 ,i - - H TEI, 2 cENITER I . : ) . phfc informatics System _ CIS) lativert. font— ,, . -matiat paticay:4_icte —I.44:-:...0 . ..... _.., tit - i atth Iiiitiapti _ . 1, i - , . ._....„ NORTII iccirtical atdiat 1 _ _ t - 1 inniptcistiaa icla i, - -t_ - -. 1: aa- illaranai $y L . DR - _ :0 400 110/11/01) 11111 hilt. . . _ --- . . _ • . ,_-- .- ! - • _-,- .-. ,- , . ___.. ...,---s.. .. .. 1�" �t 1,. AFFIDAVIT CF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss City of Tigard ) , I, i (11 (�, ��r'..1, 'T,, - r being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath f °'' depose and say: (Please print) That I am a 1 . A I S ��-V'IR 1 for I I',• The City of Tigard, Oregon. ''' V That I served NOTICE Off' PUBLIC HEARING FOR: , , That° I served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: 'ity of Tigard Planning Director u� * . �./'�Tigar'd Planning Commission Tigard Hear,Lngs Officer Ti City Council • Tigard Ci � A copy (Public Hearing Notice/Notice of Decision) of which is attached (Marked Exhibit "A") was mailed to each named persons at the add ess shown on the t; attached list marked exhibit "B" on the '� I/fh day of ; �d �{C lg .• t! + said notice NOTICE OF (DECISION asr ereto at ached, was posted on an appropriate mJ, bulletin board on the fl4 day of e 19_94___; and deposited in the United States Mail on the 91"!1'" day of ', _...... , 192.11___, postage prepaid• t. ` Ild n i epared Notice/ Decision y] Onl crd1: a"i 1 'tx ' r' ¢ r;,tv Sub crIbed:: and sdworn/affirm,to me on the day of !!'_ /,..,,r , P ., 0 r 4* y, ■ ,,,"'' ) ' . TOT• • PUBLIC OF OREGON ,./::;) i',' My )) sisslon Expires: 5 —4- .:._ s ' _.Z..4fi,..2,:fe,/.._:..e./ , 1;0 —0 A e••. who del vered to POST OFFICE and swe>rri affirm to me on the )�( day ��"2 �eight�__ r Sub cri:b � / 19 i '1!! a. Y n r NOT• •'i PUBLIC OP OREGOM s � �Yy Commission E irea: if, bkm/AF 'IDA.Vo BKm ' I � I I I 1 , c J a 4 4 • NOTICE OF PU3LIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION, AT ITS MEETING ON MONDAY, January 6 1992, AT 730 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BLVD. , TIGARD, OREGON, WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO. : SDR 91-0015 FILE TITLE: Greco/Shonkwiler NPO NO: 5 ' N APPLICANT: John W. Shonkwiler OWNER: Gus & Loraine Greco 5750 SW Carman Dr. 13425 SW 72nd Avenue Lake Oswego, OR 97035 Tigard, OR 97223 • REQUEST: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 91-0015 GRECO/SHONKWILER (NPO #5) An appeal of a Director's decision to conditions of approval number two and four of a Site Development Review requiring connection to the public sanitary sewer line and standard half-street improvements along the site's frontage on SW Fit Street. ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial) . The C-P zoning allows public agency administrative Services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, real estate, and busines8 support services among other uses. LOCATION: 13425 SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 281 1DC, tax lot 100) APPLICABLE APPROVAL CRITERIA: Community Development Code Section 18.164. (See Map On Reverse Side) THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO TN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL RECIEVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER; OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING; AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATIoN, OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TARE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER December p 19,1 ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED To REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IV THERE TS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE To THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. - APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OP THE REQUEST BY THE COMMISSION WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQuEBT PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED, h • P " lit, • ' . f r .,r m nn M44n.Y1'' tl....udn .. A.. ry ,. . .+ .•A ..• ,. .i_. r . -.•.r ..,w1..a..lu..._. ••.a,.r..,+.r.. .w.-.........x..awN-...w».,,..-.. ,.. :-m++.r rrnr+..n r ,xi...haJf.r u..i..JG..F..W...... M4..rA+..+lw....i..4 i.. ..JS.W.- m.•.....F...afA M14./t:.:.aW h ... : .: ♦ rv. ... . .r..1I w.,,..»•.x m.x....+ . ♦ YM+•nV r ..x+- mt r r K xr...,,yrw*4,4.,.,i.w:,a«.w a 4...r s..,w.a.v.-,,...I r u (• FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR. BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE . OF T.HE HEARING ON THE REQUEST OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT SPECIFICITY TO r AFFORD THE DECISION MAKER AN OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO THE ISSUE PRECLUPI'yS AN APPEAL TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TEN CENTS PER PACE. AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TEN CENTS PER PAGE. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER, Ron Pomeroy--, AT 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BLVD., OR CONTACT YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD • PLANNING ORGANIZATION (NPO) 4 5 CHAIRPERSON: CraigHppkins PHONE NUMBER: 639-0895 ..1.1 . . , r kik .. : ill 0 111/1111111011111 VARNS _---tom- 1'T , FIR • , T — * — .,'N's.\\‘'\\\-- —, . F R ..,;,\,,, ,, ,, ...i. ,.....___ 1 ,.. , mortit 111111 <c vky LP ______..1 e \ r Illik III . "ANDI R . ' \\\ 4---, 1 i _____ �r : 'kik.. x I : e i , . I • a I 0 • COOS ANGELES CA 90025 02107 SSW GREENWOOD RD r PORTLAND 011r,': ,.,7219.; . , 2S101DC-00100 ... 2S101DC-00306 : GRECO, GUS LORAI GRASCO INVESTMENTS 13425 SW 72ND 10300 CENTURY'OAK DR TIGARD 99i 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S101DC-00400 2S101DC-03300 w....,..•••••..... MAKSYM, ANTHONY J EMS, RAYMOND B PHYLLIS G 13565 SW 72ND AVE 13400 SW 76TH . TIGARD OR 97223 : PORTLAND OR 97223 • 2SAOIDC--03302 2S101DC-03400 . o OTTO, WALTER I. GRASCO I LORRIE HAY 10300 SW CENTURY OAK DR ' 7435, SW CHERRY I TIGARD OR 97223 I , TIGARD OR 97223 ' 2S1O1DC-03500 . ' I 2S1O1DC--03501 .........._... ....... KATON RONALD �i RUTH E SMITH, MARVIN V EILEEN • NAI�7 ,d • 13415 ,SSW 72ND ' ' 13395 SW 72ND AVE • TIGARD OR 97223 '' TIGARD OR 97223 2S101DC-03502 .. .. 2S101DC-03700 .' WALKER, JAMES CALVIN I JANUARY LEASING COMPANY 13405 SW 74TH 6645 NORTH ENSIGN TIGARD OR 97223 I ATTN: A A POMPEL, JR PORTLAND OR 97217 , r 251011)0-03702 .•••..•'. . 2S101DC-03703 .:.. ............,.... ' ' CCtBEAL ESTATE EQUITY I DUBAI., R BERT R AND FUND, INC , , BECK0 TOM L „ •, BY 'CAPITAL CONSULTANTS, INC: , 13500 SW 721 ' 2300 SW FIRST AVE PORTLAND OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97204. 2S1O1DC-04200 '. ', • . ' 2S101D0 04201 . ROBINSON, E LEE ACME ASSOCIATES, L D ' 15303 NW WEST UNION RD ATTEN MICHAEL PALMER ' , POHTLAND OR 97229 1990 S BUNDY DR SUITE 600 LOS ANGELES CA 9002 5 • ' 2S101DC-04300 •'.•.•. 2S1011)p1-01200 ROBINSON, E LEE PORTLAND INDIANS LTD N .R X530' .. . UNION ) ' ATTN: MICHAEL PALMER PORTLAND OR 97229 1990 S BUNDY DR SUITE ' OR 3`E 670 I I LOS ANGELES CA, 90025 ' Y� 0 , ,.;. ,, . 2S101DB=-00801 .0 � � .451013 —OO6,17, .. �., . 6•..de.• � LRRY E. COUNTRY METZGER,, DAVID AND 13360 'SW. 16TH AVE • STEWART, MAA EM ,M /AS t11.0S ' TIGARD CDR 97223 I I TEES o 80X 275 • ' SnERWOOD OR 97140 1 4� ` • 1 ,hlt , .L....,.:.a.�-.ti-.,..1'..'-:+.•..«.a....11..,la.w..a e,.,.a., u....,..:.« ,., � n,'...+,va we.t.,tn�..,.K•...Mtru.nN»rxw.A.�.�r.:=:�:va..a.:...t.;,...».;lz.+.,,eU Ax�n..,::we.,.-..,..n•v,.....,,d»,..�.,r�!�.a,..,;J.»rx-.:t.;.«',:A'..MII.A«w:..r«N.,.I-,:t,W.n..r�:},:.:,�.c:iw.u..aat.cs..n.,.A.,w r..a.. , ,.�. � .�,..•.,x , , , ,'' , . .. ,...C.-,,,-' )(I/1"dt,t.,f,,..,, (3 JOHN W 'SOIE 5750 SW 'CARMAN DR r • . • LAKE OSG+WEGO ' OR 97035 • US & IA I E GRECO , 134,25 SW 72ND AVE ' • TIGARD OR 97223 CRAIG HOP3INS ' 7430SW VARNS ST TIGARD .OR 97223 . D . a 1 6, • i , , , , „ F ' 1 ' ( . . . Ii , :. COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legs' .'/$$/ . . • P.O.BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 Noti4at IT BEAVERTON,OREGON 97076 la E C E l V E O .,SITS Lt)3 L'OpMENT ItisvIFW SD1t 91»0015 ' Legal Notice Advertising GRECQ15IIONK'6RiILER 1, C #5) 199 The'lDixocto"r haS'aliqorov d;subject to Ct34dalrOps,a''Site Devf:lapmcnt ' •' City of Tigard • � Cl Tearsheet Notice,'R vie .tact St to sofVut a 1,366 sgua efoot n ,,ZOi :xpsid(Qpes' PO Box 23397 CITY OF TtCAIZD with rely d(site icn rOve sional Commercial)•the e4,.zonititt alloW�►s,,public age#lcy,administrAti�ye' ' , Tigard., OR 97223 e ❑ Duplicate Affidavl:servrcca$ ublii.sti ai•t it c.ilittes xoles toi•►il,n,,;adm'inisitative sea• vices,iinan.c,Alr insurance;real1 cs .le,and;'bltsrness Support services . 0 W ' ' ' 'among,:oshez uses;LQC4.TtQ ,1,3425$,W 1.2nai A1."rnue( CT1Vt,'2S1 1De,ita lot At10y APPLI ABi;t?;R NZ ;PFt1 Eltlbf Corrarnjo ity' raiitc0� Pmtitttr. Lvaitiii4l 054X311. )t(+3)��( )u 108.,: 4 050( ),ri li 1,00, . 1 2 18 106 (� C n P g'1 $. A t0 8:t0r:030 0 ,050 1110 X 8'0 )C ) �(. .h. 80 T T T -- 0)08:114,110,20;1'$,150;and 1 ,1,04, AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE`OF OREGON, Y , COUNTY OF WASHINGTON )9s.. i i, Judo th. .ehler . . being first duly sworn,depose and say that I am,the.Advertising ,,P,k..'' s ,„ r • Director,or his principal olerk,of the_ ar imes ,' `~ ,, ' .' • :i',, r:' ' a'newspaper of general circt ation s defined in ORS 195,010 ,�011 N U , ' and 193.026;published at _. .ga in the ' ' afore $id c unty and state;that the NW r4 ,' \,' _' bite Develo meat/maps _ I�t �,t '� . o annexed,was published in the , .� , Y printed copy of which is herot ann x ,., �' r a t i � , pY p Ong Ive and • entire issue of said newspaper for._ success r` M consecutive in the following issues: {'a''' ' VII''''' ' .•I •''r,, . November 21, 1991 `= ..:_. ;1 ' �J..,, r- k�� ' ' \ ■ iii*' //i '''' ' ' 4111 / ('''*(1k1.1i. ''l' ' / ,. I . • i Subscribed and sworn o before met ' 21st da of November 199''. `'y_ _.� , _EM has Y _.._ ,.: !a • SITE DE X`. LOPMI7NT RSYtEW gi .'91 401d ' (. 4' ;'' � F�YJW13STiW(3Q (N #5),, Notary Public for Oregon . TJtc+,DiroctoK hits appn.yad1 subject to conditibnS,ti Site 1 a�Velopr 0n i . ' _ Revte v request to ddev op,gh tipprti,dthatcly 4$,192 syttarc:foot gcitcral' ' M�Commies ~' pin.,gicenier bIRtu Camrtrerclttltwni Sit' ' ion xpires: 6,,,.,. ltirig facilities at 1116`T g 'ate sltopr• AFFIDAVIT, CGehccal', x );`1hc'C.G` antpg tt(IttWs . public agoncy adlrimtsu�tttivi;;Services,public slip joi't,f'foillt1 t, rites- . signal and adroluisttati�Va Services;general t`ctail Stiles,i'znanctal,in , ,,. Stitariee,real estate services,bttsincss support serviccsy and'singfe-tithily'. . retadential units''amiong,'other uses.LOCATION;16200 5,W;Pacific• iiighwvtiy(WCTMVI12S1'15BA,fax lot 101),,Apl ik XCAfLla.'RJVILW ' CRITP,2IA.CcmtnttnityT T7eveldprricntCode Section 184120, • .,4;. ;, ,,,'w� •� ` gyp 0' a4 AV # ;i. • „ µ t4 Ti'' tI ra r--""'.r ai 1, ;•';'' • ti , y u '1 f!• r` i - Px ,SjtaC��1',,Tx�'� t;-...',,'I �r i, ,k ,�iC Yt4 ' The tat�o led lindin�f bl'ipel,�,dccisiea,itriil,gtxttcttittst el buttdl/1011s'~4 be ebt4Snect rrom ithe�,Plaartri"n srtine ht,'tibtArd Ch'i Center,�l, i2$ �� , .,.. '_, . ...... ... .. ..,• ,.. � . . 1'inl1��1'vcl � .��,���y�'�e��ri����tl;�S�a�'��ii�p���a1��1�, tlttii stn . dee(si n id k+ichor lot`��� Vi Sbatik9 '`l $2 290; ),ttnd'S6411)0184410.dr ,, x`11' • ;z, bf die 'pn 'iiinl'ty l e nib crit C,0 �,.;" ieb,pre es thnt,a::',:?ft 0'; �• • 1�i*,,ki 1,4 X11 :t- i• � , c , ,„ +, `, . •,.r -. *• S' i•,• . P 0 1 • . COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal led ?` , • P,O.BOX 370 PHONE(503)664-0360 Notice Ti ti, . BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 • R E C E I V E D ,SITE DEVE1bP11dENT REVIEW S611 910015 i. r' Legal Notice Advertisin #S 9 i GRFCO/$HCyI�FICW L,EL, :'i (NFU )' , �a 0 2 1991 The Director has approved,stib'ect;tp conditions,a Site Development • fatt:sin 1e:famtlynS idenceunto rate 're a nv s • City of Tigard ❑ Tearsheet Noticey. w t1a ,,t td ca err a 1,36 ZiIdEi C,*p.,(1'rateS-. . PO Box 23397 CITY OF TIOAI�I�, ' ;,prafessiona afilces witlt'related site i mvernen S , • signal irotnmercial)'The G,P zoning divs puitirc,zagency,adminlstrative l • Tigard, OR 97223 • C] Duplicate Affidavi services public'support 1Facilities;'prjte�'sionat and,admLaistrative ser,• , vices,financial,insitrance,�reai esta e,and,business support services . . ® • , among other uses L A'I`IUN` 13425 S.W:,•72nd'Avenue(WcTM 2S1 • • 17;,';taX'fc�l 100).APPLtCAEI,iE° E�IEW:CRIT'ERIA 'Coe iki ply pevaltapSrnda iu eatAO�tw1; . I.t108bt,(AJ.(V( t, 7 $:,f730(A)j4 1831Tr0b, 18.102,18:106;020( ( ),18.106.030(C)(I),18,1.as as0,!18.108.080 ---- '(A),18,114,18.120,1,8:150,and.18304 ' AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION "t , STATE OF OREGON,' ass, ii,ot GTO T OF WASHINGTON,COUNTY O A , 4 I,-_Juditr ��er �4 being first dui)sworn,depose and say that Iar ,iteAsvertis(ng '.., 6 wit • ' ,q : , 1 , ,', Director,or his principal clerk,of the, g . n ORS 193.010 t'o n s defined i , of general circulation a newspaper g n � a ,,. a • and 193.020;published at F °arct in the ,� ��� V ' ' aforesaid county and state;that the L:15 - V bite ueveiopment/maps � SI`T ' a printed copy of which is hereto annexed;was published in the '• �,',- p e for_ One _successive and ' ' l�� entire issue of said newspaper f r ." t ' r, consecutive in the following issues: K � �' �-u`la i�sf�" November 21, 1991 _ � _. � i ' tea , ` 1 , i1d e.----'r . , $u o before me this liscl'ibed and sworn 21st..d_BY of November, 19. . .. .**, ., ® ; ,, SITI�I3:BV)3LbPIVENTREVI11W S1)1,91-0014 r AIWA. 1 v s• f " F �' WOOI7 • �PtPO#.6 Notary Public for Oregon The.Director has approved,subleet to conditions;,a Site Devaiopmen a �, r Review i'egtie�'t to develop an appro�ciinately 4'6,192 square footgenera My Commission xpires: l� retail store and relaledpairking,facilities at.tlieTi ard,1owne 4'quare she � -' ping center,LON;GE C G'Genern 1 ' AIFI"II®Ad9`T ' { ' :l CoiumerLial)�TiieC-C?�okti.ng�aloi�r'� ' public''agency'adtrunistgative Servicds,pubiic°support racrlitie$,', t`ofes ' ' '• sional And adrninistra,tive'services,gertai'al retail;sa'ies,fitiattoial;'in suratico,peal estatr;`/sOrvicesi business stipport services,and single,rfanxil' zesidential itPits''iimtitig iiiiit'uses,LOCAfTIONi'1620,0 8�'!N,1'acift • Highway(WC IVI2S1,1511A,-taxJot,l.a1)d,APPLXCABLt REVIEW cR015.4tAf Comittun'ity rioyeippment'Cede 8ealien'18+120, r - f4.''�� "4",,, r r fY y J 'Y ,�tir1� Y ,u 7 r Ig ' �,� . R(Lk may;• , u, i 7 p h, t r' r i SR Jr ... is +Orr 0a. f I, it ,, e,i '{ r---••.. ,.:-. , tit , ,,14,11 ,,f 100 _. �,'` r ,. . , , ‘ 6:q ,„;,4,',1. , , !: ''''..■-■ ! ':',,,4,1 ,' l!li,,„.., the adopdd i ding drtats,dedisioti,ai d Atiteiftatit f Catid(t Oils tan obtained from Planning Departnioit;Tigaid'Civio Centdr,13128 S: ' • M �a11 Dlvd:y?O.'FBox 238)71'1'igard,:biirgata 072231 The decision shta1i.4 . • final on Dctrinj2er 4;1991,Atay,party to the decistan May appeal th decision in ACcordiande With Secticin4$,32,29O(A)Arid Sectiott:1E 2 ' of the Cotrimunity Development Coe,i%vhioh provides theta wxf ttei it. ' ' t a1 ii'iay.be tiled Within'10 dais ai'te�tnpticp is gl'Oekr And sent, he den 1 • line tot-Piing or an appeal'is 3,130 '„1v1 ecrM h.4,.ig9,,•1 I rri 104 •Publish November 2'1,1001 r n , , u , 0 , L . , . . . r d , COMMUNITY NEWSIPAPERS, INC Legal 7/d P.O..BOX 370 PHONE(503)684.0360 Notice TT : BEAVE!RTON,OREGON 97075 . I .' - ,.. . • R E C E I I V E D ' , `''SITE DEVEI:QPIVIENT REyIEW SL 91- 15 ,-,' Legal Notice Advertising ,GRECO/SI3tt�'IL:FR.'!; (N1',!0#5) ���1 •The Director has approved subject tU conditions,a Site Development r;'; City of Tigard 0 Tearsheet Notice;Review request to Convert a 1,360 squatg foot single-f roily residence into +W' ' PO Box 23397 CITY OF TIGARI3 •'.professional oftices:rwith related site hip' ZONE:C-1'(Profs ' d Duplicate Affidavl sional Commercial),The C-P zonin a iesWs public agency administrative "' Tigard 9 OR 97223 p services,puilie'support facilities prf15sional and administrative ser . • vices financial,ineurance,'real estate',and business support services '',;� e 'among other uses,:I OCATION»1342$S,W.'72nd Avenue,(WCTM 2S1 , • • IDC,tax�,lot 100),,APPLICABL`E:•REVIEW CRITERIA:Community i, ,; . Develbpmentugeeticri4&6k03f1.0.,,(3)+10418 64,.050,(A),1r8.+'1100, 18.102,18.106 020'(N)(F),18.106,030(C)(I),18,10.8,050,18 108.080 ,', AFFIDAVIT (A),18,114,18 1 0,18.150,and 188;16464y PUBLICATION :.: .r: �1j.:• ,,� " FIDAVIT O H ATE OF OREGON, ) u . ..UNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss, i milli , " ier I®® . ' !ing first duly sworn,depose and say at I a e Advertising V r ��NI s rector,or his principal clerk,of the lagara 'times _, newspaper of general circuul�ation s defined in ORS 193.010 ��__MN it.:,. s• Ti arch. in the ^ ' '. d 193.020;published at � • ore id c unty and state;that ti.-a' Site Development/maps a mai A sirs D printed copy::i:: ;;:rdwas published in te P'. ,l7.a �a a� ,i ; ,;m # .. successive ands r" .nsecutive in the following issues. 21 1991 11111 ®1 G�- 1;, . r November II , , before me this. iilliNs : t■ ' . , I' nil ,„ AIM& zi2(...„/ ? . ' , A (iddi----/ l' , ,. ubscribed and,sworn c bef Y ., ; , 21st day of November, 7.9. 'I • t ,,_- S'i I'E DEVELOPMENT`REVIEW S1.7R 91-00 t4 i �_....6 .,- r M FOY/WESTWO D 1. (NPO#6-Iir_.__ het pp subject conditions,a Site,Developmer Notary Public for Oregon The Direcicir lias,a approved,sub ect to co1U k a R "eW request to develop an�approximately 46,192 square hoot general , y Commission xpirest 4--9-9_:.-....3 retail store and related,parking facilities at the Tigard'ToWne Sgfiate shop. ping Center:ZONE:.C-G(General Commercial),The C O toning allows 1 : • .FFIDAVIT public agency administrative services,public suppor'facilities,profes sionai.and administrative`services,general retail'sales,financial,in a surance,real estate services;business support services,and single-family residential'Units among other uses,,LOCATION 16200 S.W Pacific ' ' ' Highway(WCTM;2S1 15B,A,tax.lot 101).APPLICABLE REVIEW . • • CRITERIA;Corrununity'DevelopmentCede Section 18,120. , ' nY ,, . ;4741, A .---,,,.. 4, ' ,. ,,,,, 4 4p),, O fr v • . „ . . .;� . E.,,A - 1 :P:11,''''A.'..',Y;,! L._ , ___ , ,,...,,..... . 09 , 1, • K r 4 The adopted,finding of'ttacis,dacision,'and s't,ateiiteni of conditions cart be obtained frt in the Planning bepatilnont;Tigard Civic Center,13125 S,f"W. • Hall Elvd,,PA I ox 23397,Tigard,;Oregon 97223,The decision shall be final on neeenibe. ;4,199L Any poly to the decision nut appeal this ' , 1 decislon in accordance with Scction'18,32.290(A)and Section 18, 2370 of the Community Development Coda,wtiic d provides that a s+ritten;all- •' peal truly willed'within 10 days alter notice Is given and sent.,'lie dead, ^ ' line for filing�of till.appeal s 3130 ,'D ccetnb f r 4,1991, • 1 • Tl'7104 Publish Noveniber`fCi,1991, , r „r.. • ! wa.«,.......d.::.u:..rL,.:».w-...,...+.-......-..,,........, .......n.«r».......-.:.w.,...+„r...,uu. .»....• ._ .,...:,.,..s41'.,.,,'.1,.....,...•.,........•-.:..«H .«.q.wi,4....--.•.«:,h...ul•..,-...,tea:w.l.w..1 L..r....,..»............'s.:.•.a..•»..;:...M.-.a.•..:ni...iiiµ.«_a.i:...M.t:i..A..:,6µn::.i.....;stir.4.tL::,a.'.h-».ru^-a w:a;-U,.,v u,aw.,c,n wr<i-+NUe. ';' % ACME ASSOCIATES LTD •, % CRUMPACKER, JAMES F AND 1990 S BUDDY DR SUITE 600 ELIZABETH ANN' , • LOS ANGELES CA 90025 02107 SW GREENWOOD RD PORTLAND OR 97219 . . 2S101DC-00100 2S141DC-00300 • ' GRECO, GUS LORAINE GRASCO INVESTMENTS 13425 SW 72ND AVE 10300 CENTURY OAK DR TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 J 2S101DC.-00400 2S101DC-03300 • ...o.tl.O..tl .....• •tl . MAKSYM, ANTHONY J EMS, RAYMOND B PHYLLIS G . 13565 SW 72ND AVE ' ' 13400 SW 76TH , ' TIGARD OR 97.223 PORTLAND OR 97223 ' 2S101Dc�71330 2 2S101DC-03400 ,o tl .. • . .; OTTO, WALTER:L GRASCO INVESTMENTS LORRIE MAY 10300 SW CENTURY OAK' DR . * 7435 S'W CHERRY ' ':. ' TIGARD OR 97223 • TIGARD OR 97223 .. —03501 S 01DC 2S101DC 03500 .• . .. . . •. 2 �! SMITH, MARVIN V EILEEN KA.T011, R ONALD M RUTH E . 13415 SW 72ND '' 13395 SW 72ND AVE • TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 ' 2S101DC--03502 2S101DC�-03700 WALKER, JAMES CALVIN JANUARY LEASING COMPANY •,,,:;", 1340,E SW 74T.1kI 6645 NORTH ENSIGN ' , TIGARD OR 97223 '.: ATTN: A A POMPEL, JR . ^j PORTLAND OR 97217 • 2S101DC-03702 2S101D0-03703 .'...`.'. .. • . . .... ..,.. ' COI REAL ESTATE EQUITY DUBAL, ROBERT R AND , FUND, INC BECK TOM L ' BY CAPITAL CONSULTANTS, INC 13500 SW 72ND , ' : 2300 SW FIRST AVE PORTLAND OR 97223 . ', PORTLAND OR 97201 . ' �,, 2S101DO-04200 ` 2S101DC04201' .... . • .. . .'.'... ' ROBINSON, B LEE ACME ASSOCIATES, LTD ' 1303 NW WEST UNION RD 1 ATTEN MICHAEL PALMER , ' ' r PORTLAND OR 97229 , 1990 S BUNDY DR SUITE 600 LOS ANGELES CA 90025 p, 2S'101DC-04300 ...... tl. . tl '' 2SiO1DA-•01200 6♦�.. 44641p4.4164.ia.•i ROBINSON, LEE PORTLAND INDIANS S ' ' 15303 RD ; AT TN: MICHAEL P AL 229 1990 S BUNDY LOS ANGELES CA 90025 I PORTLAND OR' 97 �C DR SUITD 600 L 25101DB-44517 • . •i. ...tlyptl . . tltl•d •tl • � 2s101DB,40841 . .•• ... tl .• . .•.•. LARRY MAN C 13360 S• CGTH TWART� MMARI4ENE M /AS T ., 4 SW 7 TRH' M1� ER, DAVID AND 6 O ... UN AVE STEW , RUS' ' TIGARD OR 97223 , TEES Pb 'BOA 275 7 5 . SRERWOOD OR 97'140 ' ; 1 V. • ' s , . t • x A • 1 � a _ q �• 0 P� 1 11 • �. CO,;' r•Yfn Sr V• tl' �� �/ N . I ..... ...'� WASt�''ry GTON COUNTY .OREGON . S' • • O.R. 0 2 V ( -`- -- ' 'I7 ,;. •.,,,,,.I/„YJ.,.. ri 'W r/Iiiwri...... /. f t.,,,li 'S. .� 's "7• , ' I6i 2.36 p +�wr..e..or .� TE111,t,,C.R. NO. !071 .. t40 N' •9°24'11M 290.32 f°bU.S2 �i{0 50 153.93 ; 9°S�VP I10 ,� 2610 2700 36 01 ' } ` !t ' ' ' pp .'• 82 Ac .N 731)c ,''?Ac. • L''r•0. ' ', n , , . . . . .. .. , W:'0 '0 Iti ' .i g M 44 9 :; 50 .• , 49 0 •M . 0 ' 3 x: z s • 101'.27 110 ' 210.8 N !a f 5�9°56W 211.x7 `. 350 • . )3 . �a 2800 Yw4.48 Ac. p� 3600 0 a" �"� �`� u'• w ,o Q2 Ac.CP ' 48 la ' .$69°56'VP z 140 ti , .' t• 176.a0. 1'94,67 Of 21 P.T7 47 • O VY N 88°48' W 209.8E c ✓� //I/lU/./.. ✓�,ailll/i//I/ ✓//irri,,,.. i r/�,,. ° e+l S 86°56 W 34 w t 9 3200 N 1)9°24'W x9r;.�e . 3000 1 ' 3101,1 °, h5 . 0/ ',i 2 to a ... r �!% �c�,p • f 4 g wy W !l R, ' 5 • 25 Boo 104.90 , p 149°24 W �' N.,�'.,,,,/..4,9%40,////:'0•Y /ri •/' 'ills.-iN.iPrJ•.✓./✓...,..330E.715,.• l..330, '..ilY✓/.✓ /4//,�� 1'. ,1 '45 2.000 'SW�' ' C.F. 764 CHERRY R . ,,.,,� n f c,../f, ,ZA p C.r�{. N0. 207 TEl461, C.Fi. h10. '2071" ..,... 1d Z. • ( � 3•�3 42.51; r..r 96 S66 96 J6 96>26• e // 1800 1700 1600 1500 1400 1300 480(); • .. 1 ft �._! I'—"1 `� 'r N ti..:/. 3 .,�,_,y � N a o © .. c g. YU o'' o a' p m Q b n. 1+� y 36 . ° ' 39 0 40 ' ° 1 a "+o ty b� a 41 42 43 a w, Y �� INITIAL 5'm` s ®a4eE POINT' S N1 c r iSM r� 1�1. 9E w�: ,. ... 96,57 S0 4, 3.2.1.15 S Bea,30'24''"E . .., •, ." ` '.,d.'' fs ✓ }� "' n• ✓�. C 446,34 199.96 ,, '�• INITIAL 'I '1 ''•v I o, POINT t,c . 4601 1 46U 3 e5,: 1 2.4,E Ac. ( 2. :Ac { . a —.J., r ...) . Cri'`"1J `� `._a .1 1 t2 G' if t W.' I {.. .r?,,•�,+ r • • • 1 .. .' ,r,..., q..,,.sa,l.....:..,,a,.o�rI....,.....,_.».,.., ,...,1�_I.. wr+, ,,,,,y, y��K+v,tir he; 4 ,0 • • . ' ■ ;.SALE I'— I�./�J11 �. {' •' . Zlr'J'am3 �, CANCELLED TAX LOTS ;r • �• . �If� f"—r �' N '89°2'� � 310 tl � 3100,3901,1209,3301 :;ter,,T,.....rr., SEE MAP X00,et 0,4400,�b600, -,, y� S 89°18E •, 700,400,4 30014 Y,1 'V' 140 as 1 ID '• ?' .k,.;;¢' lac, � 11\ . � m 310 d � ......_._ 77) j`J J4/ 4I9845 tig 5._ � ' 20C) ';4g0 // / I F , r„ . ac. -o(35_r r . NS l • , .,, . ' li n 310 N J INITIAL POINT ° w .r 56!9 15137"W : n 140 1 Z5 af►02 f7G.55 r „`47,14 211 01 "� 1 N`�`w"I //rrr, Id Sg•f5 3� E'v 179,93 EAST 9.26 'C H, �+; -� K NW COR GbVY. L07 4 1y 451"� n,• „. N ' mina Vim!q 3 , ' 3710 x OAc. . /.55 c. o Ir o ni x• 30 ° • 10 :i d . C1 I pi N ,.8 Ac '� 104.3 Z • h 1 I GOVT. LOT 4 4 oil v 7l16y I 1 p•'d. .:„:,.:rr,, I//J//J. p 69O24'111 31G 1 _ �� I - vs l �{M ,. 0.�,� i 11 r /i r t r f ii' ' ! i`/irI'/ii 'r'�1.Tr71,/A4, M7 I( d I1%d °J, 1 I• o N e9°pie iN 310 0 i,' G,: ,��,5'Ac. t v �. DRIVE 4` i ,, Na xbri ,aa°4at 310 W I w m • , 6.26' _ ; N Era'2,4 W+ 310 / I I rh; ,0 4800: 500 c 0 x N ,�, N .60 Ac : � „' 'I :v' I Z9 6� 198.07 2//�C: 4"4o S 69°05'i7i'W i '. :S WES,i• 9,26 C'N: , r rn^r�• .., ., �r rrr:• it" c 47,14 I r.. // 0f3` 310 !i!: n ' 0 1�i,� \ J' .. // -I r/ 'I ///d40V4t!�r:.',r itt ,.:.�.Ze,,,.,� �•r.,,. i.. '.r,W�.._..��.' 1 o` ,ct sae”3 3'i 410 sci a 2 • I ' o ��� x � /\ N 2,89 At, a �N ci 31'3C)C3 �' 3806 wr ,, r7 1,r6AG, .23 Ac, 57 50a L7 d ttl �,..�• ' N • 1TIAL 'i ` "' OiNT i .t .x,6 `� N ® 4 w 510 V ' S~ 6 , 5,6E r k 7:,7 ilt'3t �,te; _*_ F 28 54,00 3i9,ta 0 k� V ■ El ti ..:. 450 »:_.. '"° rn0 pi b to e $ 3900 �, 1 • ', -, 2,/.9 4e. 411t: - • . , i I(L.. 1s'T .. L. t+r"r .. . ,... • , - WAGHINGTON COUNTY OREG SCALE_ I,, = 100' �. 1�tA1� 2S- I IAC" , _ _ -_- - - _�: �-.-J1 y.,—' Via,.47,--7: . i'' w��ii.i��.aF/�Si�Zi1���i1�i7�i i//fJrJr�� - .. _ ._ - - - - - --- - -- _ - �::izic�.,fi rifiir.��fi/.iui./:i..�Fi iiii�r ./r 3 890 54'V I 0 500 400 . 3 .74Ac. 2.O4Ac t i I 700 Y t-F I Z f g ' : : - .:: -.' 1 O ��h I / \ S. ri P I ,L 6�G5. 1 uro1'A 1 \ ' , I _ ;*--t I. \ • - _ _ . _ $00 # . i \\\_____0 _ _ 330 _• _ e EE - - i � 33 0 - F ' - _- -- < ,_ _.<..,� .� t 0.08 t t�0. t3R? " I r'7,„:1;( 3):3°-�JE 11A _ 22Q -1100 10©t 90{3 _ s Il./2Ac. 1 . fUEl . -40.4 i_S7Aa I. As. f/tRC. - - - - -_ .: Q-D.�- - VA RN - - STREET _ _ - - - - _ - - - �_ [E0.08 _ .�o� -- �-- �`�rj M 330 � � � � 3 s i 89°20` 381`E: _ I SEE MAP ,: =,–__ 1-.,. bP,° 2200 Ito 1000: 900 - 2.S 1 1:00 .46Ac.. .574 - 4c. 1112Ac. • . e,4 t F 11 - i 10 - 9 1 0 a` \\%, 1 J In 2 • . _70.,._. 150 ' qv I r 3°.�0 92 11;46 I r. - I` 8908 33l ' °f ..ei V • 1300 FIR L P 3Q4/= Q� .;_ s. _ C JR ,:- _ . i- _ _4,, 159 e tA - '''' -- tj - O 6Q�• r f . .. 3ti -32 e2 ( Eel o� ,z • E : ,- , _ -__..t../ Cn.: == _ __ F.,), u cz ci, i I—' tn..- r-,..-; r... ‘,.1.9 S FIB: _ , BOO =$ ' c2t) a 46A . 5 F --I STREET : -- ' - - -- ' 'I - eq' =- 7 I `§ . - c`o w 91.-- \\Y- \\I-..- 15 z 4 . t 2 u, 171 � 8-2 1C _ r-'i, _ N 32 JR t G 3= 159 4Sa' _ 1� � t 96 42- '23T ,_ i t- .. . .4&Aw _ 13e X65 1 k I-. --- _ -- - -- - -- a.Ma - _ - FIR -_--- - - - 0 - - ---- - ' - - - 57.55 S'3•51 2000 2100 t - 125 594.^.:- - 1.00 Qa Ar. _ 2S= 1 100 1400 .48Ac - 1500 `\If, .a.SAc. sr - 5 . -: I i -er,vr//l!J!...v..JIJ//JJ.GYJ/A4awr J..- tr!//t!J !//!//!!!f/!/.441.7Jlf//!///!////N/!//J-.'!/..,/J!J!///rr.', ar/J//!//i/J!/!J_•' !!/!!/J!(!!!_4//!!I//e'////I!!J//JJ//,�fJ//JJ////!!!//J////:/fI// //Y!!//.�/.�//�//////////!//f= E11`LY Id W COED. lz 4AMES HIcKLIN \cd:0.L.G 43 EE A1� . 1 D . •a• ., '41 400 . ' � t` '2.05AC, V r t 8 103 03. 7' r i (S,W, CRESTVIEW ST.Y r 103.O W3 102.79 w' o �1--5o3-; - * c. ar7 Ac 44 Ac. „,,,, ' cm N p en .. „ , ' .r , , , „ , . , 1, , S W. CO 103 , i -.01 PETER,9. SEA 00 Ac'T+r ^• EAST 33 .7 102.10 a' v 1 ' P'. 1**" Z i'll 0 : 7 : :'1 - 9. o 'j r?, a ' :' -4) t°i x d (5 A.5 3 1? cd:Ind.�0.ZO71 �o:F d.No.qc n. �','°arm Co Rd, 814.22.221721,„„414,44t2.aq:Ca,1�a• T�r�n.Co,:Ftd. +5 :0402 F 13R.T5 123.43' r - —,-..-------y 5 0 !3 2 1?52 301 V 605 612 613 N L , �� ' r „ , ' -: -: 61-1 ' t____.7 .7, 7.611. , , -- —, , 4 ' 6191.41H.2 6O6 • �° 1 I �� e� 800 00 r132_�� t 1 � A• (Q' :��� 4,• w " i l j ' . , , , !',,d• 60 I ' : ' i ' r ' : '' - ' ' ' ' ' ' 01,1'" ' ' ' Hlti)144,...1 ,.1 ._.�."�. j ' 610 . (r 15 ' 1... 616 !a ° �,� hl 24 w Oa � . � , , .1,,,011,:„,";,'",,',''',', 'z i44.-3E . , . �1r,. A ,. r •� rr v V q (q Ar 4 ,, r C �.. 13: � 50 �r. C .r iVmst ��� 9�"' ' '�, P 646 r t • ,0.4,0 ' ,' a MAP ,, y i A , I r 4t • ' ,�llla•Y !i� ....I.. .t,..•w ism n r .. v _ •u...•....v.« w_.,n- .•,.,w n .. _ � ilk .I Y ,I ■ - d'• 1 '.. , itimji 11', 1 . . .. .!'1. „ 1, , „„, , ,,r, . . , . , . . . . , . . , . .. . . . . . ,. . .. . , , , , , , . . . . . , . . .. .. . , . . „ ., _. .. , , . . . . 0 . . • ' _.1103___ ' 103.27 s a , . .IO5 102.7E 'n R e N 506 `tin �' .40 Ac. 4.O Ac. .5/AG:. I p i 9 � i \� Oi �� 106.41 (CS.No:11:7 t3D ( ii J , • . ,SW, COR W.„co., 103 't'-•.01 PETER HALTER ' >ETER 'AST 334.7 102.10 ' , IO Ac Tract 000 '0,An T'�r r' �►'Za . x • .®. ;INITIAL POINT ` •5•`„0% 01 . ' •8'01' 705 704 703 702 701 ', r ' ' . ' 7., .' : .'' ;.t..''..: . - J\ ' . G 2. . a x. . °� + . 125.98' ' ' 125.98! . 125.96' ' 125.98' 125.15' - j, 1 : . ' .9 • ; . ' �...._ j No!I�f� V1�1 Co.IRd.No.i9O2 :„STREET, Co.Rd,Flo.130 J� _ 139.76' 123.43' ' ' 'I 23.43' 1 23.43! 123.43' Sag°O5'W 165! I ‘ 1 J' a • r. �' 620 706 707 708 709 W 710 _ 2O al` . - ' l r-.� r ii��11�� y AD in • I .w:1 is 2 8 ri � at �" ai.... ... a O;f . " 4. 27 ,to .r rn tn. L .. 2 6 . ' ° 0 1 P' z !41.2 > 'm a 2> ' rryy ' N04'9605'1 ' '`s 800 . , 2.30Ar , . ' . 14 2 a d . . CO e ® . 618 .: o Yd M �.'.._ M N 24 -�s6j29 ....`iii �'I 6 " ' / � • y N �,p} 0.443 +. ti .'�D4C. h I ' oh a 25 * +'' �f e p f r „ - to • n.+ni........-Fn«.......,wA,u.kMvuw..e,r-.........—.......-.-....•r.-++..vl-w. »..��e.........,..a--....< .,u.n w- .. w v.._,..+NI.,.r....G.a._,...,....] ..�....,«...�.r.-«,-...x....w..�,..r«w.«w - t - - ��..,..{.« ....:�1-w.�.,4.,r.1.i:1.«..::ail'.-w..1..1....,..w...w.:;L.�r7....r..«t=�:'m........:LL:4i1iw 54::......';laa.CLaHdM.Wi;.,.=W...t_1.,w.+... ..aye ..-......a,.• REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO: t�„I�I",,C, DATE: J\ . (4';'11 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 91-0015 GRECO SHONKWILER (NPO #5) • A request for Site Development review approval to convert a 1,360 square foot single family residence into professional offices with related site improvements. ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial) The C-P zoning allows public agency administrative Services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, real estate, and business support services among other uses. LOCATION: 13425 1 SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 2S1 1DC, tax lot 100) APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Section 18.120 Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other Nt information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Nov.4, 1991. You may use the epace provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. xf you are unable to respond' by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as . possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Ron Pomero t. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed'.letter. Written Comxiiente: • • • • Name of Person Commenting: • Phone Number: R91w• d }3)t'lllr►Sp 1.�.BKM • . . . 1 --- 1. el' ..\ .I , V V 6 (\,r /Z.* ,... ... , Ct & NOTIFICATION LIST FOR ALL APPLICATIONS , . .- * 1. NPO NO. - (2) copies CPO NO. 2. CITY DEPARTMENTS . ' . t -ilding Official/Brad R. Parks & Recreation Board ■ City Recorder Police e.f."Engineering/Chris D. . 4 .......;04A4 ___,., . Field Operations 4 P06 . , , h P, Permits Coordinator/Viola G. 1<:', '6611 IA.i F I-P'lei r• 4...-00V0o4414-ta 0:1) _____ 3. SPECIAL,TICTS Fire District - School Dist No. 48 , . • . (Pick-up box) (Beaverton) , . Joy Pahl PO Box.200 -' Beaverton, OR 97075 Tigard Water District School Dist. 23J 8777 SW Burnham St. (Tigard) . Tigard, OR 97223 13137 SW Pacific Hwy.. Tigard, OR 9722.3 . ..# - . - ,. . " Tualatin Valley Water District 6501 SW Taylors Ferry Rd. Tigard, OR 97223 . ,, . " 4. AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS Wash, Co. Land Use & Transp. Boundary Commission 150 N. First Ave. 320 SW Stark Room 530 Hillsboro, OR 97124 Portland, OR 97204 , ' ____ Brent Curtis Kevin Martin . METRO Joann Rice 2000 SW 1st ave. ____ Scott King Portland, OR 97201- _ : ... Frect Eherle 5398 Mike Borreson DLCD (CPA's only) City of Beaverton 1175 Court St. NE . - Jim Hendryx 5alem, OR 97310-0590 PO Box 4755 Beaverton, OR 97076 Other . , . State Highway Division .............. Bob Doran PO Box 25412 • . Port/and, OR 97225-0412 . I 5. SPECIAL AGENCIES -.,...* .9 Genera . Telephone ..,/ Portland General Elec. 1.us8 Wells Brian Moore 12460 SW Main St. 14655 SW Old Sch011s Fry. igard, OR 97223 Beaverton, OR 97007 NW Natural as Metro Area Communications Scott Palmer Jason HeWitt 220 NW Second Ave. Twin Oaktsi Technology Center Portland, OR 97209 1815 NW 169th Place S-6020 Beaverton, OR 97006-4886 ,t VCI Cablevialon of Oregon Mike HalloOk us Wet 3500 SW BOnd St. , Pete Nettion Portland, OR 97201 421 SV Oak St. A Ott:1:114i OR 97204 le' I/Columbia Cable (Frank stone) 14200 SW Brigadoot Ct. • Beaverton, OR 97005 • , . u c w r� Fx u 4.w“;:... • • ...A,.ena.,w:.n.,....:7...,...;-:YY...a.u.,aw.:..l.,w,....i,:r.-a,r�.+rum.,.«. .._ ,...,_,. ......A.+....w.-k..,rai}:.. 6. STATE AGENCIES IfM. Aeronautics Div. (OtOT) DOGAMI Engineer Division of State Lands Board of Health Commerce Dept. - M.H. Park Fish & Wildlife 'arks & Recreation Div. LCDC • Subdivision Supervisor Dept. of Energy PUZ4 Dept. of Environ. Quality Fire. Marshall Other ov 7. FEDERAL AGEINCIe$ Corps. of engineers Other Post Office 8. OTHER Southern Pacific Transportation Company Duane M. Forney, PLS - Project Engineer A,, 800 NW 6th Avenue, R. 324, Union Station Portland, OR 97209 • • • r, h I r r I i I I ' M (.. ) by /T c 1'! $ a l q 'xea, (te) OPT ` r pessa,ssv lE4QI (-10 ca 4!,4 n $ p u e q isar1T F,:A 4gac3doad 6.66T Z.C6„'int;4.'7 gHT DIWO 1€ T aegwrij ',:}sub C' ti'T d B T S aav rui.A t rI 4'G t t'i 'ass doad ' >1. a ft l '4 T4 ano sax j QM *** u . $axeI P 'c i i .luisatfD srr;r 4 a XL 086T ao ualr•j : auN T M O a E xaXV e$Po'D UV GNU MS t;"e:PET xxLLI''IIW4I [ TVNOI'J IuCRY AXIS OWNS S (Agaadc,.d Tea H) €�i€O-• Qi TSZ ' 16Er_,0.3 paoDps. 4qaadoad AeTds3 sn4' s C?2 L 6 IU F C.IHVEii L AV UN Z4 £JS '6-08T 8TEE6 az a �xtap GI f4asdU!,Ld 1 i h , M EM O � NDUM OF CONTRACT OF SALE LE DATED: Jul y 16 r 1991 BETWEEN: GUS GRECO and LORAINE GRECO, husband and wife, SELLERS and • O TLF.�R and LAURIE L. SHQNKWILER '. JOHN W. SI-I NEW r +. husband and wife, PURCHASERS r Sellers July 9 l seller Pursuant to a contract of sale dated J ly 10, 1 9 , sold to Pir chasers certain real property commonly known as 13425 SW 72nd Avenue, Tigard and in Washington County, Oregon, more particularly described in the attached Exhibit "A" The true and actual consideration for this conveyance stated in dollars is the sum of $190, 000. 00. SELLERS: PURCHASERS: Ar" ,, to .:. • C�us Gres. � ohn W. 5honkwi„.e.r uri L. oraine Greco e Shonkwi�.er STATE OF OREGON 5 County of Clackamas On this 4'0; day c f , 1991, appeared before me the above named Greco and Loraine Greco, who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledge it to be their volun any act and deed. ` r.,ry. ' •r( s OFPICIAL S AL 1..►. / ° .I. °' -' Jilt/OWL, L,�E.�IRIN l otary Public for irecon G • 1 w 005017 + Comm .ssion Ex i es:, ''' IMI,aS�aN�o+ X � MY COMMISSION EXPIRES FEB.25, x§95 1 ' MEMORANDUM OP CONTRACT OF SALE ' Jw S07 . , i6.4J . . 3 • ( J= STATE OF OREGON ) ) Ss County of Clackamas } I , On this (0' day of � L-' ` , 1991, appeared before me the above named John W. and Laurie L. Shonkwiler, who executed the t; foregoing instrument and acknowledge it to be t eir voluntary act and deed. f:;�•;!, OFFICIAL.SEAL f COMMISSION NO.005o17 ,otary Public: for Oregon mv COMMISSION EXPIRES FEB,25, t995 i, y Coy=iss ion Exp i es: r-- en- 4 Gus and Loraine ine Greco � 4 13425 SW 72nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 SELLERS John and aerie' Shonkwiler 5750 SW Carman Drive Lake Oswego, OR 97035 PURCHASERS Until further;notice, all tax statements should be sent to the following address: John W. Shonkwiler !i 5750 SW Carman Drive Lake Oswego, OR 97035 After recording aro.�.ng return. to. John W. Shonkwiler ' 5750 SW Carman Drive ri Lake Oswego, OR. 97035 2 MEMORANDUM OF F 0ONTRAOT OF SALE C JWS 0 716.4 J 7 rt A lrr , .A _., EXHIBIT "Aee Beginning at a point in the. East line of the W. W. Graham Donation Land Claim in Section 1, T. 2 S. , R. 1 W. , W.M. , in the County of Washington and State of 0rer �n, which bears N. 0° 30' East 1079.7 ' s feet from the S. E. corner of said claim; thence N. 0° 30' East thence N. 89° 24; along the East line of said claim 136.0 feet; � . West 310.0 feet; thence South 0° 30' ; West 136.0 feet; thence South 89° 24 ' ; East 310.0 feet to the point of beginning. . .excepting the East 20.0 feet.which lines in the County Road; and excepting rights of the city of Tigard in and to that portion of the herein described property lying within the limits of streets, roads, highways and utilities easement. . W H a rti & , Jerry R. Hanson, Ex Officio Washington County Clerk 155 N 1St Avenue Suite 130 Hillsboro,, Or 9712 PHONE 648-8751 Receipt # 62968 Shonkwiler', John W 03/27/1991 57501 Sw Carman Dr Lake Oswego, Or 97035 DocuMents #, . Rec. . . . Survey. Vac. . . . Transfer A&T Fnd L/S. . . . Tota].. e . . . 91053922 15. 00 8. 00 190. 00` 20. 00 233.00 233. 00 Grand Total Paid 233. 00 / • I , dl r I v`�1. • • • • • • • . ..,_... �... .._...a..Y_t..,. ,.-.,F r ..-*x.�N...,u,.'_.._4,>µ'u.ya.w..,c-..w...h�wuew.x.rt„-:«,.uz_....,.r,...,..s.u.,,.n�.a.t.w�.�.�u.......... ...„, �._,.,...,u ..,....._ •�,,.- ,.-.+:+' { Y n.a,r,Nk.�s'...:.ysJy+n„aW«a.;„.a ,.Y.:i',^f�M”-«+N'1„++r+N WWYaCsY+nw,+t .+ 4si!M+IrVNtt+t,.•rr».:.w.tr—W,:v.,-a.r-NS4-w.w,4:•�r«wi•.r.yr.�+ .41/Ywa�N.rN vn.N i'Nw+i:u.•,.`+w. wbN,,w^YINrc,.�4H�n+,ew�suY.n,++1rN«;,'^r.+rr.,wrvnw.,!+�n..rv•».,-�N+;�w�.w�M....aar.v..nt��.i��wS•�.4�+s7r ”.'r".tsl+rl--•'.,i+�+^r4..w+,+i��• rk:�+4 1° 1 rµ.7 `1� •SS\i .� �'`:yp r' rvii.}'. n /"�,t,},.q.M �t<.. p�« rw.M^R.r�gre, y •aa , i'�y�`a'Y j{ hp' k w4yYr�,y„ep I� y 'Ups 1; " u y •X A ;{ .4 tui�4',a F',4@n P ?w;+4rNYan Y m r c c,3"Tv1114:tk',1 i, �n eRatd Kam:F', N 4T n9 E><.N t a.,.y.a ^• '.�+k, � �sN '•q. • � � , ,M'il. ':,� ;''„��'i.'A 1,w+.�' r.' /, tl r r • !,y �i w' v �.+� pp p��r ry g w� 1!"(''1 T�d` �u"� d '�Pn.Sk3 . C Pct,`0;' ttttatt• P)11C0it11 i 1 '.F4'� ,A' f NSNFi1XA 4.F'�1 i.pe ,.NNY,R ,M, t1W.N+lf 114 4.i0..11,,,,Y4 M4,.'F/aINIhHN • . Y rv14rWI1A,YM+IMIY IN�1�'JI�WI NMIaiANi15Y4114irMAf M.%MHNN"•N4R>T.k11+M'N`✓N��:•/iiuKf.� .�•.t.N•e,IW+IY.H'NtWII N1.R / N.W I4.NIN,NT' vufrH , .(1 • • • 1. II ,a ry�y3 N V, �wM«w, ..W,..w.,N„lww..wN+4w.NN,�—,.-Nw..,«.,•,.W.• r �.a,,,,'w+r.+.:,�. r,o.,...-•....ww..,wws.-4 wrr,�. v a. .N ` ..,w+w�r—s.,+u....w wr,..,... r�..�.+..1..�.y„» � .«.u4,w.,....e.N..._..,R,. ...,.,,....«r ...a,,.,..k....� ._.,.,.�« .......,,. .. .. � ..„ •n. t .� � ,� b D i • • ...A.._, s:dAw.l«.., ,,.. .nJ..«,. ..w.:..-.nf.1,1-». ...r J:. w..... ..a...,..mow+I....:..i..y.r..- ..-.NJM,.x..x.Y6-....■..A1..4.....•....,,...J +J., ......,-- ..r.+.,. • 4pv' . . '7 o VI (-1,!10040,-,9‘ ,L t 3- 1,.1 `"C.'z.,.... N:kz. , ..\ V \--\ t: . t �. In µ-vv�- , '. i', #, 'A ' c\ VA <\k, \ I. ' ( 0. 4 1 6 ✓ fi 'nw e)47 CArrt`L 44 .W ' . 7 -'?- '.c'e' A s\ (4,.. -c-e-, M� . • � ,. • ' bc- N\rk‘,e. "t-ete c- ' set A%s'\,,Os"A.16.0"fA- S', .'s1/4.e...Are,c.) ON it I c.,4-4-) 0:2)c 1\r'C--ct-AAA,C1. '-a- .0. LLPO-Pd V-,. VIL0,471/tA."4., "\-A., ' ,Nt-4, e. M • . r\ L.,‘ \ ' 01i'.' iwk,. A0-1-\:,,- \c.e-Avu)s s.. ,,,,A,--..--..:,--,,,-4-t-,,,,-k 0 c:,0-144. \,e,._ -,e..c.\,. 7A4A. SA"84 f5or--6 ' 1 ,.., 1 l' . a Arir'T;i\Je----*/- •e- 't,$ii--tpc-e— ,., .i4A,.'S S'""z-A ,.k V).(k,C71A.■e-4'. VeAt-, r , , : IA‘,.s N-e4-ittkie.,....gz_ t, _1_0* ,2trtr-0,,......V-2,,-,4, .,_., Itrer-e-k V kAt 74 c-to-r, 4:3C-\, r " . 6.1.40'ir- ' 41-- C3:- r- ' iilik- c .0 Vi te,4) r, tA.,)k2AreA,J<,,,ir-, ‘.. •„x.to.,..4....4,„,„:5 . es)cc.4.A., 4,-% , ' .1 L ci,t) ,:\ ,,, : c..., 1 4-c-LAY"till,.e,44.. ,c\ik..0.... -\-1.A.AA-r/-b 4CV-.":2,4A. '%. 4-1,e-iti'''r `t,' ■ °Axe t r 7 „, i i II I t 111 ,....,h,..,.J+„la,'.1.4„,.... f.,..,...wa.:'m,, ,,,...,.. ..:',:i'„:i1..:..,.,m,.,......4,_..n.,.,...+.MU.,....,: ,„:.....,+..a-::i.,,,:....—..,,,r,.-.;..:....T.y-.:. ,..«+•,'...M. .,«., w 1.. t„k4.:.,:,, ,..M..Ma4;..,..e',Lio................d...,. .,aw«.,','',., 1,...+..,,.:.rz.:.,.....,..-.,,.,,..-r...,i.c._',...w-4.:...- ,.,. .t.+--u wda..'.,.r..,„,...;.. I , ' . , . , i , ,.. ''(i.i4.1,,,,T:..:,, , ' r r ' P • y + _ �+ ..�.� ,..+r+.w..+ter ,• • , : : 404.. ./•.4:,A, : ' '.7 ..:.' 91) .‘:2,.'/i.:/...e .„:,:,,,..' :''' : 'C'ei,:d..,/e...0':P,:... ..L%.21 ...4. •Ie& ' . . • l ' '' '' ' :::''' '' ........, 1..... ' I i' r ` .-..,,�,d. ,rte /./'�/��y�/__,'JJ 'b. C57/1,'.'''' ' ''.71/(:74..j'e' .: ' .'fdrt M'j.et.....j.L./Z:i.....044i2 :. : ' , , . , . , • • � � ; � � , M q r.�. ,,�,� ' : ._ ' ,::_ / 0� - / j n , • g{6 • w-...................:._..w..«M-w.,.,+.+.r,-.+:'.+r..-." - —w�..,.a.a«.�.._.,.....,.....-._.....a- a,w-u, v...,.w.u...._..:,, ,w.�.«w,.......,,... �, 'k'if 6 ► '” IKJmvUkti #7802641 lrnob .l 1 1-1 rT r r C�II...., , 11u.; Y n ' nl ' P P � . • a Monday � June 'e, 1991 `7:00 7: 0 I d , 8:00 8:30 W 9:00 1', 9;30 ' 10;00 1 10;30 ;,4r, ,, Mr 11;00 ,. I t---/ __......_. , 1'1;30 12;00' " I:00 »,,:..,w �. A 1;30 F 2;00 2;30 • ~ rte�/ P ± ,,�"" 8;30 � s 4:00 x '` ,1, � �� a • . a . 4;30 '„„,,,,,o'' } . 4 ,e4i 5;00 # � ,1 r \ ri�L l' • . „---,- ,r-- of-) ( 0,1,c,,d,, 1 ti i v i,, it r r 1 1 , i 6/),‘,6--- -7,0_,/,,,t,t,,,,i.,,,1,4";-1..-L..,, ,,--t.it/2-/ 1 ,i;W...,/,,,,-g ,.....„..., , („.4..„)/, . ', i i. . , , 1 ,,/tt.,,,,t,e,,,,,,7 \fi1 (;144,41,71,-8 , a � ,J., 11p ; ,e , eic,,L, i r s G .., ..,,, ' . . 4,,,, e,/-1,,,04,4),, ,,-, (A/A cvt- re:112A-4 , t., , c...:).„‘„it.„, r II tUrt,t,of' 0C4''' Ili ; 1 f i, 0 ^.. . , 101111)111!) „ridlijr41 . I TIGARD -, OREGON I, understand and agree that receipt r - of build ing permit number BUP 91-0299 shall not be interpreted as endorsement by the City in favor of my appeal of Site Develc pmenrt Review SDR 91-0015. I also understand that prior to obtaining a B- 2 (conunercial) occupancy permit I must satisfy the conditions of � 1/ approval for SDR 91-0015 as they stand or as they may be changed as a result of the outcome of the appeal. , 14..) A. /7.-Zer 3 Applicant Date • jV/ • JJ ??' Witless Date 1. • '7. Z.. i r Ili ' 13125 S a Blvd.,P O,Box 23397,TIgc rd,Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 �4«7 idG4�1.�e�Hall�il►�'rfij . . .. „ ,. .... ..-.., . ., ... ... r . 4. , _ • 9 .. . ` ''',,:,,x,",-"....x... .•6•".,.,..,..;,+.,'",'4...,,...:,.,4.......«4... ,.=4.,,,,'1.0...c:.,,,.._.-«.:,:.._1.S4- ''s.t:..•",,.,"-.I...............». ..-44..,,,,. ..,« :..::..-•ua......:,.we.;wt..::44...4 u!. .,..,,:,,,,.., ..:14.4,...a.,..',i,.:':...A4.'...:J.:1'- ''.a.:«-1.x.:+.r1 14..4,..a�.nnM'''.4..::.+...,,.W...i..,'�........=h6 ntu•"w'., ..'4,il4.,,r..a...:,,, t. Gw�._ ..-��r r� �r Jl�rlil LJ ��0. fi, �r ' wry , . . ,, . ' ...p.,, . . ... . . , .. ....._ . , C2f--,,, _ roil" ..-. ..___." ...., '''......' -4■02,-e.. .... .___W.... Tg„..e_ae...4 • -....--- _ .< .v _ • / r f • • ao , '' ,a .,./&.., ,.. ..,.., .1 , .. .. - �� V4 �:.yVh,rr N.+.-..�, '.�:...�.� �.„�,. ,.�.,r w ..,.. ..„4-4-4.4-.4-4444,.C1 .w.,a,�.,�, G �„.�."r+�' •t C "'yam ,.....,.«....i.. n��..,.-,. w. "•'•'�"•° .«w• +..mr.�.r•.•+,.-:r`V� r.+�.rw` "( u.{�� .w.�»+.rr•«. ..n w...........+...•..M.,.,..u�. ..�,... __ «w s.+. .w .......44.. ..,......+...n .ww..+r,r-,-.n ,w.=<a.u,,,w+..,:..xx- n.w..:w.-n++...•.,.r nr..., O • + (.„.., WM. . /�,f(' w ■ 4 : ' ' . :,5- , r, ,-,..:....',,' . 1.. , . , . W,,....n...ae,....w+..w rrl... .•.+++• ...�....+nw+.. «.....�.:.�..+..,.r......+.w .....+..w.+..........wn ,w.w..a,.,...���.n.i.n+wrwr«.» ..,r.Nrv..«ua !--• „y •. ......,.... I i w.,.w.w.ww,a....nn..+w.+w.w.w......,.rwwa..a...r. . .•...�r.:.�. w««.+'wn. +..«,.+.....r,...-...>•w.+.n.....« .,,.µ,... .- :_ uw�ew ..... ..,M.,w•w•,.• 1 �1 � � ' � � I I.,I a r.r.,.or., ,,. .ss...,.wwa,+. .«w..,.r.• .......+wN. T dw: MA......W.••..w.irww+,r«W..,wnw..rww+wuuw.v,..o.wnr,,...M MW w. .a**�.....,.1.,•Tar+. 'Ili. .' .r ..N.:,M...+�.«•rl«�..Ww.•.M. . `...«.u..«n.«..+d,.w+M+,.ww,•+o-wu. r� ....... . ..•.,r,l'4.•�.«..n...n..,... vn- .,.w..rrr..a ■ • r v .,w � - r ..., .. +I „ ...,...r ,. _I � .,.w-»+,«..:�+....,..w:.r...r.....,......rn»..-.W-r,4w:«.•wr,ww.•...w:=W,1..1- I •w.a.w...w...,x,n-r.,u-.•.. . �x a.nw. 3 v I ,,,...-....m......:.,....:...........+...,,. x..,.,4...I I..,....,,...M!m-4.....,l..1..,.:.. , .,...+ r✓....a....,.. ...,,.•,, -4.i 4,1..,..,.,,,....44,,,,,,,.-.i..,,:Fi.v...,, .µ.;.4•,....... .,w1 r, ('. '—/g14; i i 1 r CITY OF TGARDA ,, OREGON i . i; 1 November 12„ 1991 i. ti John W. Shonkwiler 5750 SW Carman Drive Z Lake Oswego, OR 97035 t RE: Traffic Impact Fee for conversion of the residence at 13425 cgs 72nd Avenue ' to an office Dear Mr. Shonkwiler Enclosed with this letter you will find a calculation sheet showing the calculation that ha:s been performed to determine the amount of the Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) to be paid for the project noted above. The calculated amount o the TIF is $1399.00. . Please note that you may appeal the discretionary decisions made in determining ' the appropriate category and the amount of the fee based on that category. ,A ;', notice of appeal must be received by City of Tigard Recorder no later than 3:30 Hearings heard by the Washington County p.m. ,on November, 26, 1991. ' An appeal would b ,� Officer. ; . }• Please note that this calculation does not constitute an implied or explicit f ` approval of SDR91--0015. If SDR91-0015 is not approved and the house is not converted to office use, the calculated TIP is void. If you have any questions, or if I can be of further service, please contact me at 639--4171 ext. 390. Sincex:el r . a 0 i H VI �'oodwi 1 ti€\\") r Permits Coordinator 555 V. A I({ M \\CC\\kP'\\\ \\\ki IP t f,. t 0, l A 1312 ^Jy �S11V'�N��i�I�dt; ,`Tlgc��r�,C7�e an 97223 (503)639-4171 r ,4R b I .. ' iii f� i� � .i � � �,I, � � f� ,• i „ uA�.:*-w,.:»,•,.+: �:ti..il......w,....4i»J.�. ......�,xw-....uu..,.». +,a �,.,_.,»-,w.t,......s,.:,..... �w.......r M,..,a,..,.��.,..��.z a--..— r...,..«-,.,...,...,_._.......wM':.. .M...-m�,.:.aa.+a�..:aa.-.. .J, ..,....�r.,w,«..w�*.,v:.4,+:.+:L�!.•.+,..4n=.:..i.:..-N.,,_i,A.«:.�1-w+.�.«.91».u.�-r.V..k.ti2...�.�ln�' a;+ .-:o+,.d.4:�«,:,..:,.�.w1.,,1.i..Ya.t'�4.4:r..�1.;b.:,aW'..�..J»w« Y 3 �a1y, DATE: PLANS CHECK NO.: :+;'.'.. lik: l2 —II._ /f/t''C PROJECT TITLE: COUNTYWIDE TittiFFIC IMPACT FEE APPLICANT: WORKSHEET , -" A ... f FOR NON-SINGLE FAMILY USES �I+�-LMN ADDRESS): CI /ZIP/PHONE. RATE PER ,. 03 r. , .. ,N 6 E,,D...k1M,1Y TRIP TAX MAI'NO. 5 RESIDENTIAL 9,138.E Z6/ _i.b ._».._ C, B INE $_AND,_, IVIMER IAL ',35.00 SITUS NO.ADDRESS:• �. •.�, '.12 .QO �.. '&_7 ' -- N: IND TRIAL ',133.00 r IN INSTITUTIONAL $57.00 PAYMENT METHOD: x II CASH CHE .—__...,.....___- 11 1 CREDIT INSTITUTIONAL ONLY: 1, ....................___.- IN BA•NCROF T PROMISSO Y NI©]E LAND USE CATEGORY DESCAIPTION OF LISE EEKDAY AVG.•TRIP RATE WEEKEND AVE 13UP PATE ?; . DEFER TO OCCUPAr CYL C / /6. 0 .. F BASIS: 4404Ne;E dr el "'" ' P :/66--dr.)r/A-,e._ 1 d _.... ...�....�.. _ rte..-.�.r..... �.+.�. a. CALCULATIONS: i iftet 3 Jr) '—'•( t X. I t3) X ti$'iZef 006 — 13'99,75 PROJECT'TRIO.GENERATION ' ' � � '........�....�.,. I I v , li 1, 1 1 FOR ACCOUNTING PURPOSES ONLY: 1 i 1 1. h ; ,/v . 7i ir 10/ /Ze"?06 ., } ORE PAR E b ere, CO: WASHINGTON r�COUNTY TIP NotEBOOlt form MO i • • • ..TP+.e. A.1•e.+.f.. WA.w!e q .Ma e.L �..,rT sY.•i^'wwr,.wa+..'nux..+..`rld«ul',WMMwJiib}p'NxwrJ 4r+M♦ L xy�Ym� - .. ,.I.a •. * 1' L14•ar.h1HW w.Ww�x 1H+�Yyr 1` woelte,4,140.041040.+44.4.±)4,444*404.10.4*lwwwnnovfi*.44.4A,kw.w+M,04,4..aw:N.14044fy,40.4e.n:4440,4 4-$.1.4,4-44 44.'..0 rra.eaywHd^ 4`1wM'^'�M «w+r'+�N*n,si•i l..+.I4M.��;,r.,w.Jw,., ...:.•,wiP«4 n.�uu�.,'.wr.»wJ�+«+Lmu Da:•}C:�'i:; Y�4;w.'w-r ryc,:�.w�u.w;u: »ei++.:w.«:swb:t-r i++vLa,:. ,..:1:..wwwr.••klyna"+.+ ,a}, a .n • ,'� ix �f 4 Y ! J W IM H M .YW r 1y4 Y 4�iN r 1" � . Ir Y; cif) P, . r£,�.P 1 or "C.1 Yisir:,` � , :; :P ° "140,„ �r 1 r ; , 7 YR i�,i�l (11111:14,31(.4T ;4' „ t i-fC)1 1K 1p; ":�.0 `y�i'1,r,�1,llL��,y}IN r k °,�t a� jC+ ��{t��r ivii t..1yyJ N,MN.��'T {p q ryy� ��1 � ]p R) .N+r t;11,' T1 1.1. }` i"111W4"' F� Yw YILY.1-)RV Y �'Ri^�J Mw „, DATE fµc s��h� ' I il" � t, fk fzil Ski "8 .�,r;� w�a tI IBX)T V I 13' Llikl, . 1i' O WE4 4 Oft ri N x•,...w r:p •n rt �'�du if 1 ♦n n ~ri w. �I I i �1 *� wr �, t O)�JNN'�i" � 'i.i� eb of i :(«"1"'IYti ,N I ilt).;UN " "' 1 i tl4 . wwµ1wF,Wm rlyjj yrlH•!l.rAgWr .+IYM'i.W/.1.4Y.t}L,hY1`J e�Q'i'f}�'lWil^wrvY+MwW.Ha1F+M.iv1F �I IYf.WyNW=NHhlri!`d. g/pKAyH'0.rWiw A'.mc..I11U,�fy(4, {U"r lyv/M�y`yU,YfWN�Aadi4N[1,w w.Y#M�1/r•Yi @ M�•ilyr�.+�gFbHry}1�M`yA•M �MYfpJN.u'A YAwMaweY.`.WNNX 0� /:i, .M1iwtAM.•:.1 H1Y�tyM1�4.p>.'HL(.k'1.K.Ix%0•!�YdrWlr/ , • µl+Iwrpli''l CZ w4�:i 4�1��� I iM�iK�Mr P+ 11f.`f�fn^Q(',T %..N F !'V iI!,N' �F• C4'F YUF fIM Ale i'^ �4, ,-1µdX�,cb4rrif .. ryt ,R i iM.+'!w.�',,,, r 13 T u ry''0 11 Fl?„ 1',.f,f o 1�fwy 1 � -Fivi t 4 EJN5 sir `r'M Ylal�N k� �,�w,l'li 1 , 111/i�. YI I li i��i"�.I I i. T i` .l► �w". � Ni � ff Y. I ill Y J I I TM . •' /` /A 144rW, bM1eFWY, a.YR rt.114 { _ -n.r...+-,.��wrw.•w+. .w.«4\f..-w.�ww++. a K_..,,,.. .,... +M-1,.e�.. r .w w�I>„ o�......I•. ..•..u.,...:_+:J``m•Ww.�4l,.,....r�f ew.ww.:".•w+•..✓r-•�I._..+-w.na"«w+uuf.+,w.wA',Ar.wr«�4 ` it • _c0/7 7 ; C / • } � e ql - / it • • • TRAFFIC IMPACT PA M CT FEE • Installment Payment Application and Disclosure Statement • In the Matter of the Traffic Impact Fee for Shonkwiler Conversion Tax Map 251 01 DC Lot Number(s) 100 Building Permit# BUP91-0299 Site Address 13425 SW 72nd Avenue Subdivision N/A •,,� Case File # SDR 91-0015 TIF Land Use District C-P To Be Billed To: Mr, John Shonkwiler • Address: 5750 SW Carman Drive _Lake.Oswego,OR 97035 �• To the City of Tigard: : • ; In accordance with the provision of Oregon Revised Statute 223.208 and Washington County Ordinance No. 379 which relates to the imposition of a traffic impact fee for the financing of major collector roads and , c,rterials of Washington County, I/we HEREBY MAKE APPLICATION AND AGREE, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY,to pay my/our traffic impact fee, as has been determined by Washington County Ordinance No. 379 in six 6 semi-annual installments of the amount financed together with one-half of one year's interest thereon at an annual percentage rate of ei h_ ,g t, ercent on the unpaid amount owed. The lien date is the first day of the month following the date the application is signed, The first payment is due six months thereafter and at six (6) month intervals thereafter for a period of thrglipl years. Each installment payment will include principal and interest: l r ,/ Y i Y f If refuse r 1we neglect or refs to the i g t set pay any part of a nst�allment,� provided herein, including interest, within one • (1) year after the same shall have become due and payable, then the whole amount of the unpaid assessment shall become due and payable at once and shall be collected in the niG:iner provided by law A including foreclosure on the above-described real property. • • The traffic impact fee, annual percentage rate of interest (8,0%) and finance charges which I/we agree to pay are as follows HIGHWAY TRANSIT 1) Amount of Traffic Impact Fee i . . . . . i . . . . . . x,;-,•,,.1239.00 �• 110.00 2) Amount Financed . . • • $ 1289:00 .�, 110.00 Iq„ p y . i . i L - Y�• Y • i i�i'i • ! • i i 4) j Principal Payments � , i i i : i � Y �_._....�.�._. , 3) Equal Semi Annual $,� 21�i3.3 18,33 ) Interest on Balance at .ate of i i , + . i : i ei ht 3 I\We understand that the amount owed, as stated above, shall be a lien on the above-described subject . property pursuant to Washington County Ordinance No 379 Section 6 (D) and ORS 223,230, ED t is day of 19 ' .,- gnature of Property Owner(s) Signature of Property Owner(s) i /1146 4�'ATE OP O"�k;C�Or� ) Name Please Pnnt)i � frr i i Y I I • County 91 Washington ) D AND SWORN TO BEFORE � r RE me this �''�� .' S�JBS�GRIBE `' da f , 19q • AirleWe' I , • ary Pubil for 0 4.• My Commission Expires: ''' I I inlvla'\f �it • '„.,.M..�h..�...yi.+y,..�,,��ur-4,_u-��.ia�...rn..4a...a.,,»�W,a...W:� -�.�I. .<,.. � ., I _ •r • . M� � to %/' • r ;2 t. . )...; t ct i I 4.d3— . , i r �'h 4 I,may , • C , 'J` v, �. ..In.,.•,,. ...,, , ,r� ;ir n„.�,r,u r.,_, ., a... . ...., « .,..c,.. �l•M ,... , ; .. ,✓ • , r • j t � . • ...-..-.k..,.. a. «r,..-i„.., .' ..,)r\1......],i„,..,._...,....,r.,...,...u,;i.-...,....M,.-.,r.:..,,....,w-....r„4.L... ,.+.. 14,,„u..,,-...t.,,,,,.,..,,:,,,.a.,..+,.:•;.,., ,...4.4...,„-...4,..1.4._,∎-..ri,,,,,,... ,..,.,_ Ls ,. ' , AFFIDAVIT OF MAILINGI, STATE OF Oit.,' SON ) , County of Way,:ington ) ss. �' ., City of Tigard ) l'' • If:c42.21 �( ,, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath ' • . depose and say; (Please print) !. . • That I am atn�'�'”` +�"_O 4ss,S ILL==......._.._. fob` l''' ' The City of Tigard, Oregon. ` That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: '----"'That I served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: _ City of Tigard Planning Director '` 4.--....,,, Planning Commission Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard City Council A copy (Public Hearing Notice/Notice of Decision) of which is attached (Marked I. Exhibit "A") was mailed to each named persons at the address Shown on the !, attached list marked exhibit "B" on the +"' day of A., 1917--�, said notice NOTICE OP DECISION as hereto�hed, was posted. on appropriate ' P , bulletin board on the , day of 2-.. deposited , I9. o and de in the United States Mail. on the j :'• o lk ! , 1�._..` 7. , postage prepaid. „- 11,..-2 /1„A.A,A4 K. ,i,v,.....--, Prepared,,Notice Posted_yFor Decision OnlyL St,1b� x'�%bedaanc sworn/affirm to me on the ' - day of c —,L2''' .2.t.e&d-- , r •r NOT Y PUBLIC OF REGOA ” ! My �,ommission Expires: "`.► _"' ,y is ' Person w' delivered to POST ICE1 + 4 � or • r.i„bed a w '� and .s n/affirl to me on the �. day of I dill NOT • C o? OREGON r " � N PUT3I,I O. , , ��� lly c ise1on EXpireS ~� 6`' 3 1, bkm/AFFIj,yAV.E3KH } i J ,� �, • • :�.»..�», .. -.u', .M...,...a....«a._.._....,.a.:.G............:z......a.:J..-`.:i.W».,w..i.;....,1.«,.. ,�,I.,...M,_ ..ti.«._.,........,.._.:t'..kilt. ...,.. a_,.,.....-..«,,...,..........i,««.._.,:..4..„.-.-.,..-..J.w.. ,+.,.._,.•.:i.i.`.„,....... iU.,.....,,,......,,a..:..:+...,.,....•w:.....:-:.r.«....d...w.,..'..... :,.c_z...... is,..,.,:+..,...,,w.M.,.u,,, CITY OF TIGARD p' Washington, County NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER -” BY PL1 NNING COMMISSION 1. Concerning Case Number(s): SDR 91-0015 2. Name of Owner: Gus & Loraine Greco Name of Applicant: John W. Shonkwiler 3. Address 5750 SW Carman Drive City Lake Oswego State OR Zip 97035 4. Address of Property: 13425 SW 72nd Avenue Tax Map and Lot No(s) .: 2S1 1DC, tax lot 100 5. Request: �.n a•p•peal of a Director'a decision to conditions of ap,•pronal number two and four of a Site Development Review r_emuirinq connection two the public sanitary sewer line and standard half-street improvements alone, the site's .frontage on SW Fir Street. 6. Action;_ Approval as requested Dpi X Approval with conditions �' • Denial 7. Notice: Notice was published in the newipaper, 'posted at City Hall, and mailed to: 't, X The applicant and owner(s) s" X Owners of record within the required distance v X r The affected Neighborhood Planning ;', Organization X Affected governmental agencies 8. i -. . . E 2 9. 1992 "_. �. Final. Decisa.on.. THE DECISION SHALL BE F$NA?:, ON Y:!'anu)� UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. The adopted findings of fact, decision, and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13 125 SW ,1 1' t . Hall, P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Appeal. Any part . to the decision may a eai this decision inY 9. . y p y may p�'.. accordance witL'l` 18.32.290(B) and Section. 18.32.370 which provides that appeal y within y i a wt. The appeal may dub City forms must, b g, and filed wi•t • given an sent. pp' '• . Submitted accompanied b the appeal fee $315.00 and transcript costs ubmitte p y pp � � .p costs, (varies up to a Maximum of $500.00). 4 Thy deadline for filing o. f an appeal is 0430 p.m. J anuary 29, 1992 10. Question,s, f you ny.questions, please p City of Tigard If ou have any qu 1e�.s'e caj:X the G�.�.: Planning Department, 639-41 bkm/SDR91-15.BIC! • M " w ', -... •,.., _ .... .....ti,.a,.., .d.4..-•,J,.✓.,..•......- n..a. .n,rn...•..,.,Jl.,-.....n.r.w,n•.r-..n..rnr•...µn....•...,_...nl'11'r..i ,a.,.. ...r,1..,. .-..++-n....M-i,...1.... .]. ....I..A11t, It, • • • • CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION.• . .. FINAL ORDER NO. 91-15 5 P C • A FINAL ORDER INCLUDING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS WHICH AMENDS THE APPROVAL OF AN APPLICATION FOR A SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR 91- 0015) AS REQUESTED THROUGH AN APPEAL BY JOHN SHONKWILER AND GUS GRECO i' The Tigard Planning Commission has reviewed an appeal of development conditions placed on Site Development Review SDR 91- 0015 at a public hearing on January 6, 1992 . The Planning Commission has based its decision on the facts, findings, and conclusions noted below. I. SUMMARY OF TI-IE REQUEST CASE: An Appeal of Conditions of Approval 2 and 4 of Site `,.. Development Review SDR 91--0 015. • p REQUEST: An appeal of condition 2 requesting that the • landowner nOt be required to connect the existing • " structure to the public sanitary sewer until either the property is further developed or the current • . . se?tic system fails,.s , �Also. an appeal of condition or 4 requesting a non--remonstrance agreement for half- street improvements on SW 74th Avenue with the half-street improvements to be completed when either SW 74th Avenue is improved or the remainder of the site is developed I / ' OWNER: Gus and Loraine Greco 13425 SW 72nd Avenue Tigard,and o OR 97223 ' •y APPLICANT: John W. Shonkwiler a 5/50 SW Carman Drive Lake Oswego, OR 97035 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGN ATI ON: Professional Commercial ZONING •� I , . DESIGNATION: C-P (ProfeSsional Commercial) I j ' I LOCATION: 13425 SW 72nd Avenue WCTM 2S1 1DC• tax lot 100 � 6 APPLICABLE LAW: Community Development Code Chapters: Co �' P 18: 164,030(A) ( ) (a) ,i8a164 03O(A) (l) (C) (iii.) o ' I FINAL ORDER 91-15 PC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW-S HONXWI7ER PAGE 1 • I r II ,' I � ` • i I i n • 4 1 , 18 . 164 . 030. (A) ( 1) (c) (iii) , 18 . 164 . 030 (E) , 18. 164 .030(N) , 18.164.070(A) , and 18,164.090. Comprehensive Plan Policies: 7,4 .4, and 8. 1. II. FINDINGS ABOUT SITE AND SURROUNDINGS A. Background: II I The Community Development Directors' designee approved Site Development Review SDR 91-0015 for this site on November 21, 1991. The decision approved the conversion of a 1,360 square foot single family residence into professional offices with �~ related site improvements. The applicant appealed conditions number two (2) and four (4)I of this approval. This appeal was heard before and approved by the Planning Commission on January 6, 1992 . There have been no other City land use decisions for this site. II I I B. Site location and vicinity information: The subject parcel is located on the southwest quadrant of the intersection of SW 72nd Avenue and SW Fir Street. Southwest , w I 74th Avenue abuts this site on its' western edge. This site is bordered on the east and south by properties which are zoned C-P (Commercial Professional) . The property to the north is zoned R-25 (Residential, 25 units per acre) and isl developed with the Hampton Ridge Apartments. The property to , the west is zoned R-4 .5 (Residential, 4 .5 units per acre) . ,!. '' C Site information and description:proposal As stated by the applicant, the subject property is currently / improved by a single family residence Which .is approximately l `: 1360 square feet in size) , a 352 square foot detached garage, an 80 square foot tool shed and a 143 square foot well house. The residence is currently nerved by a septic tank-drain field, water well variety of ' I domestic Y. deciduous and evergreen trees located , and a dome There are a �. . g trees around the perimeter of the site. Access to the property is currently from SW 72nd Avenue near the corner of SW Fir Loop and SW 72nd Avenue. I r' The a pp licant requests Planning Commission approval to allow , an amendment of Conditions of Approval number two (2) and four (4) . Condition two states that prior to building permit t issuance, the applicant shall connect the existing structure 1, to the public sanitary sewer line. Condition four states " AL ORDER.. 1 15 PC DEVELOPMENT REVI,E SHONKWILER 2 FINAL 9 M C S Y TE �E W- PAGE I I. I � I I I 1 {ilk LL , •.M , ' ...4e. n...... ..,.1:.-ww-V.....................«a r,.w .....t.r.n...,..u..,r+.r....n,,.. «.. __,.. ...... .I ..».....,.1-A. ».0 .+.....,...w....w........,.n..m...r..«.....,.i w,......J.»..,..1'. .. f:....l--r....-.+•.+,w..r+..... w.s,.....r...«.....».-4..f.....tls4....1...m+....!✓,.IUM.:_,.J'.a...a.r.i.....0_i.,...v._ wry.py prior to building permit issuance, the applicant shall complete standard half-street improvements, including concrete sidewalk, driveway apron, curb, asphaltic concrete pavement, i � p � sanitary sewer, storm drainage, streetlights, and underground utilities shall be installed along SW Fir Street. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to Local street standards and shall conform to the alignment of existing adjacent improvements or to an alignment approved by the Engineering Department. The applicant requests a licant ests that the landowner not be required to � connect the existing structure to the public sanitary sewer until either the property is further developed or the current septic system fails. Also, an appeal of condition 4 requesting a non- remonstrance agreement for half-street improvements on SW 74th Avenue with the half-street improvements to be completed when either SW 74th Avenue is improved or the remainder of the site is developed 111. CONIMENTS , I I i A. Comments and Hearing Testimony: The staff report was presented by Senior Planner Dick Bewersdorff. Mr. 'John Shonkwiler presented oral testimony in favor of the appeal. Two neighboring property owners testified in favor of the appeal. No other public testimony was received. A taped recording of the oral testiir'ony was M1 made at the hearing. Minutes of the public hearing are being prepared at, this time. I , IV. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS A.. Sanitary Sewer 'i. Section . Section 18. 164 ,0900 (Sanitary Sewers) states that sewers are required and shall be installed to serve each new development a n d to connect developments to existing mains. Additionally, Plan PolicY 7 .4 .4 (Sewer Service) the City sh a ll require that all new development be connected to an approved sanitary sewerage system. Implementation Strategy .8 states; I , The p u.. r po se o. f Policy 7 4 4 and a el at er policies is to • permit pre,-existing development utilizing septic tanks or other landfill sewage disposal methods to continue to use FINAL ORDER 91-15 PC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW- SHONKWILER ` PAGE 3 • r INAI RDE1�:1 I I t l r d 0• '^I i such methods, until a change of use occurs temphasis added) , a new main structure is erected, etc. . . Additionally, Unified' Sewerage Agency regulations r eq uire sewer connection for structures within 300 feet of a public sanitary sewer line. Therefore, staff determined that 'a nonremonstrance agreement was not warranted because: 1) a sewer connection is required when developing commercial property; and 2) this request does not meet criteria for granting nonremonstrance agreements; there is no provision for a nonremonstrance agreement for sanitary sewers . B. Half Street S Imorgvements._ Section 18. 164 .031alilltal states that streets within a . development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with this title. Section 18. 164.030LAILLL011 contains the code standards for granting non-remonstrance i agreements for. street Improvements. The g . granting of such agreements is discretionary. Section 18. 164.030 E1 requires a minimum right-of-way of-wa Y of 50 feet with a minimum roadway width of 34 feet for local streets. Section 18. 164 .030(N1 requires the installation of concrete curbs, unless exempted by the Commission. Sidewalks are required by Section 18.164 :0701A1 to be, constructed on M' both sides of local streets and that they be constructed along all portions of the property designated for pedestrian ways in ,: :• conjun ctio n with develop ment of the property. Sout • d s d as a local street. . , Southwest Fir Street �s classified The portion of SW Fir Street adjacent to the site is fully improved on the north side, including sidewalks. On the south { side of Fir Street the pavement width varies. There is an extruded curb and 20 feet of public right-of-way. Comprehensive Plan Policy 8.1 (Traffic Ways) Implementation Strategy 5 requires developers of land to dedicate necessary • �rights-of-way anc instal l necessary �mpr vemer s t ath C it s standards � improvements have not been done , prior to the develo er s proposals. h ese necessary dedications ma y be required upon approval of any development proposal. . FINAL ORA R 91-15 PC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW��HOMwILER 1AGE 4 '„ ., v...,,.,».„:.wit.:.....+.,,:....,:,'.::. ..._.....,t«.:..Ji..x,-«,.::.;....-.,._... ,..,....,,<.:.a ..w...»r... ,,..« -.....4.,...,..w _ ....- .,..,...«.a......n. r...u..'...a.,. ,. ._a.....i._.f,.a,.:..a.,.,,..n:4.,,.««...x.,.........i,w....,,_.—,w,..a._a i u..,a. c • I t The requiring of half-street improvements along SW Fir Street for this current application is according to City standards and is. consistent with code requirements and the fact that vehicular access to the site will be from SW Fir Street. City staff has offered a nonremonstrance agreement for improvements to SW 74th Avenue based upon Code Section 1 t3,L164,030(A) (11 !cj ivtna which states • ' . Additional planning work is requ .;;ed to define the appropriate des;'fin standards for the street, and the application is for a project which woitad contribute only a minor portion of the anticipated future traffic on the street. Staff recommended that a nonremonstrance enonstraYce a reti ment relating to improvements on SW Fir Street was not warranted because: 1) half street improvements are required when developing property ? with substandard or nonexisting improvements; and 2) this request does not meet criteria for granting nonremonstrance agreements VI CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commissia n found that t crit ~i a (iii) of Section 10.16 .0,3©(1 c is applicable. The code section s states: • Due to the nature of existing development on adjacent ` properties it is unlikely that street improvements would be extended in the foreseeable future and the Improvement associated with the project under review does not, by i itself, provide a significant improvement to street safety or capacity. • The applicant provided a letter from the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) indicating that connection to the sanitary sewer system would not be required unless the existing septic tank failed. The 0 applicant also indicated that sewer elevations in SW Fir Street ' � make this sew er line unacceptable for s ervice. The applicant 1 suggested that improving the street, and then later tearing up the s street same ��for the purpose of serving future development, would not, he appropriate The Planning Commission voted 7 to 0,'in favrir c�` this appeal. The plan omm .s • rule four� 4 shall cl that conditions� � number two � , a.n { (2) n C s�.an n �tions of approval nuzru and (4)� � , be amended �as follows: SITE FINAL ORDER� 91-15 PC���� I'IE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW-SHUNK'G1'ILER PAGE 5 ;•� -4., 'I , •t. A ,4 ' �y Condition No. 2 -y The landowner shall not be required to ''•' tf connect to the existing structure to the public sanitary sewer line unless: (1) the existing septic tank and drain-field 1 system fails, or (2) the landowner expands the size of the :p existing structure or replaces it with a new structure. Landowner shall be required to obtain approval from Washington R County Department .of Health for the change of use. In any event, the landowner shall be required to be connected to the public sanitary sewer line no later than the tenth (10) year after the date of this Order. Condition No. 4 • Upon improvement of S.W. 74th Avenue, or the landowner's proposal for a new building or expansion of the ''. existing building, the landowner shall improve or shall " participate in a Local Improvement District to improve S.W. Fir Street with standard half-street improvements; including concrete sidewalk, driveway apron, curb, asphaltic concrete pavement, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, street lights, and underground utilities. Improvements shall be designated and .,. L constructed to Local street standards and shall conform the alignment of existing adjacent improvements or to an alignment ` approved by the Engineering Department. An agreement shall be executed by the landowner, on forms provided by the City, which waives the property owner's right to oppose or remonstrate against a future Local Improvement District formed i • to improve S.W. Fir and/or S.W. 7 4th'I Avenue. In and event, r the landowner shall be required to construct the above i • described improvements to S.W. Fir ,'Street no later than the tenth ( ,10) year after the date of this Order. All other conditions approved under the November 21, 1991 approval issued for SDR 91-0015 Iremain the same, 4. THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN 18 MONTHS OF THE FINAL DECISION DATE AS NOTED BELOW. 1• It is further ordered that the applicant be notified of the entry of this order. PASSED. This /47 day of 7. ,:G 2 L r 1,9 9 , by t e Planning aia.nx.rag '\ Commission of the City of Tigard. . C.- irr/ 1 ' , ../ "Ailif*-- -.4-- r itonr. :'►�'-s dent I •,,�: Ti. r�. F�.a.t..-i .i�Commission l RP:b riX91-.i5, fa F l N�L ORDER 91-15 PC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PAGE 6 9i r - 1 111111 .t r The City of r - 1 — h. R D , ._ __. , _ ....„t..••t.fr ._.„: v.. _ t !•,i_,• il mi,A ii Miwae ill E n mn i mpoenlllsimimtmki m i, l m, }\g. \,\\ \ ( SDR 9I. - 0015 = S . r VAIN I __ i %' StteAreG - i 4 N L____11-1 - . f � ,Illp\ ..-- tF. 1 LD \\ `� f MI I IMO I NMI < i .... > 1 L' ,-, I` • I i--- t DR SANDE,LIRG . f AMINE I E I j �i C —1 6lgika1 ft=ta ar; ?alrcrsr— [ . I tttite ee=tiic! 6; llc 6tt;_ of .ti;erd°l1rl it-1111111f h4 t this 4- r'' tlernrlitt. S jritra _ fYairfijtl ttr- 1 : CEN ER c irt4t(rt re t_ rind 7111.1 editiiteai__ itcbttcal other 1 1. _ o T g Falctjtetetlre WI- 3 DR('� x '�f i 2riiraierd F; i f/ e >' ti tie City rl 1i13ft., L____ ihk,..• _ 1 (MPS @4t15) _ -� -440 (tOlt2 3t) 1 . . ______ ____________ _____ _____ ___ __ __ ____________ _________ __ _ _ __ ___ ________ ____ _____:.________.___________ . ...„.,.. . r_______________________::_,___:_:__: ____, __•_ , _ . .. _ _. _ . _ _ , A , �,�{:. ,,.,....,r..._....__... � :u._,.�an_,.,.-, .. ,..-_. ....».„w.._t ....•......,..»,.-.r.....�..�_ .,,...__w..._+.:uu.r.M...�.� ,. ...,�r..o. .._........._,.—.._..,�..a...-, ..»�......,w�ui..:.+-r�.�....,, .....».,......W r....,....-.... �... .,_._..N, iY-r;) .. • • ) A i { JOHN W. SHONKW L T E R 5750 SW CARMAN DRIVE E' LAKE OSWEGO OR 97035r :; «;. GUS & LOR INE GRECO �,��,�,,,1,, , 13425 SW 72ND AVE a,M � TIGARD OR 97223 ' �. I s i n a ' CHARLES & ELIZABETH LAUCK , 13395 SW 72ND AVE' ,'r " 0 . TIGARD OR 97223 •, / .•. i JAMES C. WALKER'', , f ,, 13405 SW 72ND AVE TIGARD OR 97223 I '1 . ''' CRAIG ROPKINS 74S) SW YARNS ST I TIGARD OR 97',93 } •`I • rr I • i .e, v • I • • • ......-,�•.".—l..a...:,.. ...,.......M. .:.'I .,+.- .:. , .,,...,.,.: ...,.. ........-1•'..,IL..,....._-,...._. ,•...a..l-.,.w.. i ,.....• ..«..,... ...M4. .1t•.,..,..L«,.,w..,.......,_».«..r.r..::...........,._..e.....<.4...: . reviewed the 'material in the Workshop packet. ;'e discussed the goals, statements, objectives, existing Comp Plan, and the standards. He used maps to show the standards now in place and those proposed. He said the proposed standards would promote more open space, more tuck-under parking, and smaller setbacks. 1 . Presidei t Fyre called the meeting to order at 8:00 PM. The meeting was held at Tigard Civic Center - TOWN HALL - 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon. 2. ROLL CALL: Present: President Fyre; Commissioners Barber, Boone, Fessler, Moore, Saporta, and Saxton. Absent: Commissioners Castile and Hawley. Staff: Senior Planner Richard Bewersdorff, City Engineer Randy Wooley, and Planning Commission Secretary Ellen Fox. 36 APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Saporta moved and Commissioner Boone seconded to approve is the minutes of the December 16th meeting as written. Commissioner `. Barber abstained. • 4. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATIONS Senior Planner Bewersdorff noted there was a memo in the meeting packets from Liz Newton regarding appointments of two NPO members. After brief discussion, Commissioners voted. k Commissioner Barber moved and Commissioner Fessler seconded to recommend to City Council appointment of the two applicants as per the suggestions �� . ' made by the Mayor's committee. Commissioner Saxton voted 'Nay. ' 5.2 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 91-0015 GRECO/SHONKWILER (NPO #5) An appeal of a Director's decision regarding condition of approval numbers two and four relating to sanitary sewer connection and half-street �, , `• ; improvements on SW Fir Street respectively. ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial ) The C-P zoning allows public agency administrative services, services, financial , insurance, real estate, and business '' support services among other uses. LOCATION: 13425 SW 72nd Avenue ` . (WCTM 2S1 1 Dc, tax lot 100) APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community • Development Sections 18.164.030 (E) , 18.164,030 (N) , 18.164.070 (A),, 18.164.030 (A) (1 ) (c) (vi ), and 18.164.090; Comprehensive Plan Policies 7.4 and 8.1 . Senior Planner Richard Bewersdorff reviewed the background of this appeal and explained the t • .' a p too conditions of approval being appealed. He stated that Condition 2 required connecting to the sanitary sewer, and 11' vl he discussed Code policies, Comp Plan Policy 7.4.4, and the Unified � Agency regulations pertaining nt situation. not explained Sewerage pertaining to this si tua�7 or�. He Why staff determined that a nonremonstrance agreeme was warranted. He reviewed Condition 4 which deals with half-street, l nand discussed waffndetermined that a nonremonstrance improvements agreement •e t`ng to improvements F r Street was not warranted. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JANUARY 6, 1992 PACE 2 • • ♦ r i to ., .. •i 1 :....._4.4,n! .......,;...l.n......WN....".n J....—.'+.4 u...rn..._.,.. re a l.... ...,...-,.....�„ ...�...�_._..rL.,.4W.wrrs.r ,.AJr.1 .1..n,.aJ. ..A..��.......ni.....1.�4.... ,.:ta..,..i.l.«r.w.41�...... .d..«.J+,.�.n.A+, _� .«._u4....._. • o City Engineer Randy Wooley responded to a question from Commissioner Boone and explained why the subject building was not currently on the sewer. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION d John Shonkwiler, 5750 SW Carmen Drive, spoke on behalf of the applicant and land awo er, He d escribed heZ 1-acre site, a nd structure. He stated they planned to convert the existing house to an office; and .Y 9 k' p after approximately five to ten years, they planned to tear down the • house and build an office building. He presented exhibit photographs x showing the house and nearby buildings (see Exhibit A). I I ' He explained their opposition to Conditions 2 and 4 were concerning the • timing of these requirements. He stated the existing septic tank 'i is good, and new proposed use would not create a greater burden on the septic tank. gg City p He suggested the Cit � accept a certificate from the Count y Health Department; with the requirement to hook up to the sewer should the septic tank fail or upon the enlargement of the building or l construction of new building. He submitted an affidavit from Unified Sewerage Agency concerning their requirements and recommendations (see Exhibit B). He submitted documents from Griff s Septic Service, 'Inc. and Washington County Department of Health and Human Services concerning the condition of the septic tank and County requirements(see Exhibit C). Mr. Shonkwiler discussed the engineering problems connected with hooking • up to the sewer on SW 72nd Avenue. These included elevation concerns y repaving costs, and the more favorable aspects of connecting to the sewer on SW Fir at the time the new building is constructed. o In discussing Condition 4 pertaining to street improvements, he provided photos showing existing street improvements (see Exhibit D) . He talked about objections they have to making street improvements at this time include, pointing out there will be no impact on the streets as a result E • of the conversion of this house to an office. He provided photos showing locations of utilities which would have to be moved upon street • g p f' . • , improvements (see Exhibit E) He presented a map showing location of undeveloped land and subject property to demonstrate the minimal impact this site will have on the streets (see Exhibit F). o Mr. Shonkwiler proposed the following wording for conditions of approval (see Exhibit G for original submission) Conditions of Approval Condition No. 2 - The landowner shall not be required to connect sewer line unless: i'�e exi sti ng structure to the public sanitary l�ne ss. (1 ) the existing septic tank and drain-field system fails or (2) u the landowner expands the size of the existing structure or replaces it with a new structure. ". ndowner shall be required to obtain approval from Washington County Department of Health for the change of Use. .A PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JANUARY 6, 1992 PAG • IT �0�� lei;.'.. '• .»« ' ._....._:.r..,..,r........_................n4.,_..,--....., ...... ..,.,.1.:-.«,..._.,....... ...,.,... i .... .,... .. ...-......,,...«.,_..1. ...,.,,..... _.........,...,.....,i.V,.!-:.......w ,"....r..,...........,...r....:.!« _.. .....,.J;.....»..,.,.._....,....t»:ni.,.., .+t.t.,A...ui......,,. ,-. r. . r ,ai Proposed wording for Conditions of Approval (c cn ti need) w Condition No. 4 Upon improvement of S.W. 74th Avenue or the landowner's proposal for a new building or expansion of the . existing building, e landowner shall improve or shall participate { . in a Local Improvement District to improve S.W. Fir Street with standard half-street improvements, including concrete sidewalk, driveway apron, curb, asphaltic concrete pavement, sanitary sewer, , , f', storm drainage, street lights, and underground utilities. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to Local street . standards and shall conform to the alignment approved by the Engineering Department. An agreement shall be executed by the landowner, on forms provided by the City, which waives the property owner"s right to oppose or remonstrate against' a future Local 9 PP Improvement District formed to improve S.W. Fir and/or S.W. 74th ', Avenue. a In addition, he proposed Time Addition to Conditions of Approval Condition No. 2 - In any event, the landowner shall be required to connectethe public sanitary sewer line no later than the ' r tenth (10th) year after the date of this Order. Condition No. 4 - In any event, the landowner shall be required to construct t a ove described improvements to S.W. Fir Street no II later than the tenth (10th) year after the date of this Order. o Mr. Shonkwiler answered questions from Commissioners concerning number 4. of clients expected to visit the site and sewer connection elevation details. o PUBLIC TESTIMONY o • Charles Lauck, 13395 SW 72nd Avenue, said his residence is at the end of . SW Fir Street, He was in favor of putting off the street improvements until the new office building is constructed so the inconvenience of the disruption to the street will happen only once. James C, Walker, 13405 SW 72nd Avenue, testified in favor of the applicant's request. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED o th�lm� e r Boone favor applicant's 1�cartes bordering on << parking along property. pp quest 1 I o Commissioner Fessler agreed that the request should be approved with her only concern, be�being t o consider adding n g N o Parking" signs along the. south u Side of the road. � o Commissioner Saporta was in agreement with. previous com. mett s and I , favored improvements being made upon any expansion of the property. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JANUARY 6, 19g2 PAGE 4 • • � .... a,,,...._,»aw..._., ......,....t.,.,_. _.,�,.:..u.,. _..,w.a.--t,.u. 4.,•.._,w,...,..... i - .. ..w.......,-.._ ,,. ..�,..,«....,........, I,.. _.a.. ...F,._,... •._�..w...«,» ,,.......,_...,w-..,,,._:..,.,..., ,._.,M:». .,,. _.9...,,.a.w.�......,.«...,_,..,+.a.,a...,...u.... _.,. -�jj • o Commissioner Saxton noted there are other properties like this one nearby, and he would like to see improvements made upon any expansion or new development. 0 Commissioner Moore stated he would vote with the majority of Commissioners in favor, although he preferred to have sidewalks put in ,, in most instances o Commissioner Barber agreed with previous comments, but she said she was not in favor of "No Parking" signs. _ o 0 President Fyre said ai d he was in favor of approving the applicant's r e q ue t. * Commissioner Barber moved and Commissioner Fessler seconded to approve the appeal request with Conditions of Approval as amended by applicant (see page 3 and 4 "Proposed Conditions of Approval 2 and 4, and Exhibit G as provided by the applicant) . Motion carried by unanimous vote of Commissioners present. 6.3 TEMPORARY SIGNS WORKSHOP Senior Planner Dick Bewersdorff explained the changes made to the sign code dealing with temporary signs. He discussed lawn signs, which include real estate signs and political signs. The 32 square feet maximum size for temporary signs, including sandwich board type signs was discussed. • o Senior Planner answered q uestions from Commissioners about temporary :•, signs on vehicles, which are not not permitted. There was discussion regarding monument signs with shared space used by one commercial establishment at a time. He answered questions concerning advertising balloons and garage sale signs 6. OTHER 14.• • Commissioner Fessler asked the Commission if they were interested in taking back subdivision hearings. There was discussion about the types of planning workshops and actiities which are appropriate for the Commission to be involved in. o Commissioners discussed the non -annexed areas in Tigard which would be better served if they were annexed. Quality of community, law :. enforcement, and various codes were considered, as well as ways to encourage annexation PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JANUARY 65 1992 PAGE 5 ,. uiWJ4Mw.a,r.i ».uW rH.. Aw•'.r. LUM4:i•1W1i.J4• vikNF.: .v—,....,..1 ...e..,v♦In .r, I Conditions car' Approval �' L Condition No t, The landowner shall not be required to connect • the existing structure to the public sanitary sewer line unless: (1) the existing septic tank and drain-field system fails or (2) the landowner expands the size of the existing structure or replaces it with a new structure. Landowner shall be required to obtain approval from Washington County Department of Health for the change of use. Condition No. 4 -- Upon improvement of S.W. 74th Avenue or the landowner's proposal for a new building or expansion of the existing building, the landowner shall improve or shall participate in a Local Improvement District to improve S.W. Fir • Street with standard half-street improvements, including concrete • sidewalk, driveway apron, curb, asphaltic concrete pavement, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, street lights, and underground l utilities. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to Local street standards and shall conform to the alignment of existing adjacent `improvements or to an alignment approved by the ,^ Engineering Department. An agreement shall be executed by the a landowner, on forms provided by the City, which waives the • property owner's right to oppose or remonstrate against a future Local Improvement District formed to improve S.W. Fir and/or S.W. 74th Avenue. II I I I n ! • L I , •r I .' • I I I li • ' I I I I I I 4 a c, s• .. aaY..,.AL...+..1,A.•7r .cwt,..r.+a»l.n. u3J.. l..L..• ....Y r._......a...,ir, ..».. _.... +F..•.1l•+!.•...r wl..lr.N +.w.-.w—:L ....IrL.::a.u...... u...•a.._ •W.. Y.—...ta..43wArw...w..A.rw •L......raWU.u-...,w.«•........-, ._...r.. o Time Addition to Conditions_of Approval Condition No. 2 - In any event, the landowner shall be required to be connected to the public sanitary sewer line no later than the tenth (10th) year after the date of this Order. Condition No. 4 - In any event, the landowner shall be required to construct the above described improvements to S.W. Fir Street • no later than the tenth (10th) year after the date of this Order. • ho .k I ' I I r I I ar' I I r I I I r.- { 4 ` .,..,.........., .1.-..•.....n.1.............1�Y«......,..rlr...a..rl...n...,.. ..._.L..„-A,..... ... .i .. .a...r..•r4Y,..-A,,wri..... ...1:.....r..w.....r..l..r,...._.,r-..,✓1..,..:w.w .A..,ww.....,...a.r..«.......wi.. .,-..r...+...r„-r .....«..........+.x_.r.........a..w_.,,.m..rx ..n..-,i..,.... .n ,». .i..ti...r.,w - ' 1 AGENDA ITEM 5.2 emu, MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: RON POMEROY, ASSISTANT PLANNER DATE: January 6, 1992 SUBJECT: APPEAL OF SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 91-0015 GRECO/SHONCWILEht Site Development Review SDR 91--0015 has been appealed by John w'., Shonkwiler (applicant) and Gus Greco (owner) . t ' On November 21, 1991 the Director of Community Development approved • an application for a site development review` (SDR 91-0015) for a conversion of a 1,360' square foot, single-family residence' into M ' professional space with related site improvements. Both the applicant and owner have appealed Condition of Approval e numbers two and four as listed below: A Condition of Approval number two (2) states that prior to building permit issuance, the applicant shall be required to i. connect the existing structure to the public sanitary sewer line Condition number four (4) states that prior to building permit issuance, standard half-street improvements, including concrete sidewalk, driveway apron, curb, asphaltic concrete pavement, ' . sanitary sewer, storm drainage, streetlights, and underground utilities shall be installed along SW Fir Street 4 The appeal form states that requiring the existing structure to • connect to the sanitary sewer prior to building permit issuance is not timely and that condition #2 should be amended to require . hookup to the sanitary sewer when either the remainder of the property is developed or the current septic system fails: q In addition, the appeal form states that the requiring of half street % e on SW Fir Street prior ior to building permit issuance not tirel m amended allow� the signing of a non-remonstrance agreement with improvements to be completed when either SW 74th Avenue is improved or the remainder 1. of the site is developed Condition 2 Sanitary Sewer: 1 Section 18 c 1�4 �090 (Sanitary Sewers) states that at s ewers are 40 _ required and shall be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing ma.i.ns `� �� . Additionally, APPEAL SITE I SDR 91- 015 SHON11ILE i • f 1 a.. ...1 ;,.. ~ r , • y . Comprehensive Plan Policy 7•4 e 4 (Sewer Service) st states that the City shall require that all new development be connected to an , approved sanitary sewerage system. Implementation Strategy states: The purpose of Policy 7 .4 .4 and related policies is to permit + pre-existing development utilizing septic tanks or other ' landfill sewage disposal methods to continue to use such methods, until a change of use occurs [emphasis added) , a new main structure is erected, etc. . . Additionally, Unified Sewerage Agency regulations require sewer • connection for structures within 300 feet of a public sanitary ! w sewer line. • • Therefore, staff determined that a nonremonstrance agreement was not warranted because: 1) a sewer connection is required when developing commercial property; and 2) this request does not meet criteria for granting,' nonremonstrance agreements; there is no ' provision for a nonremonstrance agreement for sanitary sewers. Condition 4 - Half Street Improvements: Section 10.164 .030(A) (l) (a) states that streets within a -" development and streets adjacent shah. be improved in accordance � with this title. Section 18 v i64 .030L ( 1) fie'. contains the code '` ' standards for granting non-remonstrance agreements for street improvements (attachment A) • The granting of such agreements. 'is discretionnary• Section 18.164.03.0(] , , requires a minimum right-of-way of 50 feet , with a minimum roadway width, of 34 feet for local streets. Section ' 10.l64 s 030(N1 requires the installation of concrete curbs, unless exempted by the Commission. Sidewalks are required by Section 10:164 .070(Al to be constructed on both sides of local streets and : that they be constructed along all portions of the property designated for pedestrian ways in conjunction with development of the property. Southwest Fir Street is classified as a local street. The portion of S W Fir Street adjacent to the site is fully improved on the • i north sido, including sidewalks. On the south side of Fir Street the pavement width varies. There is an extruded curb and ,20 feet of public right-of-way, Comprehensive Plan Policy 8. 1 (Traffic Ways) Implementation Strategy 5 requires developers of land to dedicate necessary rights-of-way and instal necessary street impvrov ements [emphasis s added] to the City's stancards wh en such improvements not been done prior to the developer's proposals, necessary dedicat ions may be re quired upon a pP roval of any development � 'r proposal. APPEAL SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 91-0015 SHONK ILER PAGE 2 ''• ,..t«l',r«n.,,nw..-' ,4N,:nv,1 `+.4 ».. + y.u.+Mr,.J..u.a -...4...,...alw+,.,.._..,,,�..................n,.,.,.� . ...._...wa1r _..,.,.+...+.,.a,..2-..Ir....l«�A' „.n....,.i.-,.w'I..i.L' .+�.,Lw:.n ..w:.V..,..n •A4+•.J ix, ..A.,•-•*M..w;+w....iw:�. I«I ,w• 4t a+rJ,•,....5w.ti•i*-1+.4.44;.,:•..lJ�.n.ww,4g The requiring of half-street improvements along SW Fir Street for . this current application is according to City standards and is consistent with code requirements and the fact that vehicular :. access to the site will be from SW Fir Street. City staff has i offered a nonremonstrance agreement for improvements to SW. 74th Avenue based upon Code Sections ,,164 0.'03 0(A,)i1 ,L c_•,;) (vi) which. states I . . Additional planning work is required to define the appropriate design standards for the street, and the application is for a project which would contribute only a minor portion of the anticipated future traffic on the street. ' Staff determined that a, nonremonstrance agreement relating to . improvements on SW Fir Street was not warranted because: 1) half . street improvements are required when deve,? Dping property with substandard or nonexisting improvements; and 2) this request does not meet criteria for granting nonremonstrance agreements. • • Also attached are: 1) staff report SDR 91-0015; and 2) applicant's appeal statement. a.teI[len.t. Recommendation: • it is recommended that this appeal request be denied. >; • APPEAL SITE r ^ VT REVIEW bR 1 Obi � y PAGE • • • y/ " . / LAND USE DECISION APPEAL FILING FORM The City of Tigard supports the citizen's right to ' participate in local government. Tigard s Land Use , ,. s Code therefore sets out specific requirements for ,• 1 : filing appeals on certain land use decisions. ciTY F TIFARD .- . . . The following form has been develoPed to assist you in filing an appeal of a land use decision in proper OREGON form. To determine what filing fees will. be required' 1 or to answer any questions you have regarding the ", '' appeal process, please contact the Planning Division or the City Recorder at 639-4171. ,; 1. APPLICATION BEING APPEALED: EC 5 Oe'��, 6�.E t'2 SITES ,�`' V ELO rn E _s f , . 4 e.:E\J I G-7._.._:j6L_Aep_ay.0 L V ZL.1=,.._._.2 s It_..._L.3A:21L- 0 0 1r._4..._____.. . ' t`; i 2. HOW DO YOU QUALIFY AS A PARTY: „ v 1.. C ,;,;. . 5"D R. -- o©A'L { f 3, SPECIFIC GROUNDS FOR APPEAL OR REVIEW: F o No, :.- �egliiilz Efil 1 Ai OF Cb NI G-6 r/ > I ► !A.s& ST'SuCi i r k ._., 54/t t ____'T z +_a Is NO§` , , r F L�•e AN b 6 O D L b ',E.. 4Ig . f1), g� i te E., H 0KU' �.).4- ,J n.- Lb1O OF P c Ece I V 9 5„ ?e-ti.: "D ., �;• )/a , 7)__ _ fY� Lh:. 4.6 614 E _R . ON t)./n o ci AJ O, g L-°'. E vin Em. 7- . -,,, (5k Sr4D4,71t 11 1. srgEET 44 ►. 4 i f-s or T2,11 4 Lci ANn' 6il-to OLD D ,lam, -.t'. 1 Pa ice.__,,, i ,E.,._.4.•i 4I V E le OF 1 N?".s e;�&,1/UC! • i.. T-. 1.0 /NL.+ .S&i 7/7/1 Aa E frinpie v vE_ • 012- `.A..) 14 ai;3_A. M 4I riLD C F r►' • - —' r I '' tl.. 1- ,• l M-rte - v � i�?5; ccc.c uie , inn , e-,er i .�_ F'o.r2. I C H c,01.--U-0 SE F'v wl:. To -ram `tip A AS . ° 4. SCHEDULED DATE DECISION IS TO BE FINAL: i' ,./ 9./ i s 5. DATE NOTICE OE„;,,F'IN,L DECISION WAS GIVEN: 1/ / / /9! 4 i 6., SIGNATURE(-►): ' AL L- p2 . _ -- ■ 14414{-00(M X k K X400-X-X- 41) t•04-X-X�(4 •yi d44( - -X-00(4.1 E-•�4-�}t/)(41 14 l4•�f,1440 3 'l4004)(4^'�-?444400]l )/`-'��000t i X. : C” 1.G1P2L<�;(`(.a' Date /7'� 1 i me: / 1Pil rrn . FOR OFFICE SE ONLY R (:e x t►ed Dy. �:3� Approved As To Form t3y; ��� /fir •. Date: /4,2,324/ `I-ime lc;,c . '' Denied As To Form By LI Date: Time: . No.N Receipt p / — 5' Amount: ! ?s, 1( 30440 -300(-14 000(* ***A#)00E (*)(4E Y0(•!(0044 -I(-0 I i44E 0(404 I4• 0 04-00 0(840444 44 x* - 13125 SW Rill Blvd.,P40.Box 23397;Ti g and,Oregon�On'�7123 C 5a3) 689-4171 1. • ,.t.... ..I.-i.,..,....._._le...+M....«.1.......-........_..,.....-..L:.._.....,»,....-.._,......--...,....,w..,... .,...> ._.....,,,_..a_........,..,...,....._..-..,..,....,....r1.»..a•-...,x...n..ln.....w...r......«-..»,.u....-,..a........,..—,.......�...,.».,....«..x.-....-.........r.......t..w.........w ._.......«.«..»....:..I+.....a.u ...v,....,..1..:..n....- +.r....-. } 1 C q • CITY OF TIGARD 1 (l: NOTICE OF DECISION REVIEW SDR 91 0J15 f. SITE DEVELOPMENT DEE�OPIT Ei' ' '`... GRECO/SHONKWILER OWNER/APPLICANT APPLICATION: A request for Site Development Review approval to allow the conversion of a 1,360 square foot single family- residence r into professional offices with, related site improvements. Zoning: C--I' (Commercial Professional) Location: 13425 SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 2S1 1DC, tax lot 100) . 3 . The :C-P zoning designation allows public agency J.dministrative services, public support ' facilities, professional ;' and administrative services, financial, insurance, real estate and " business support services among other uses. SECTION I DECISION: Notice is hereby 'given" that the Planning Director's des igr ee for 'the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above request subject. rk,o certain, conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted ;n Section II: BUILDING PERMITS WIC'., NOT BE ISSUED UWW. THE CONDITIONS LISTED BELOW ARE SATISFIED. UNLESS OTHERWISE N&,_ D, PLEASE CONTACT CHRIS DAVIES IN THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AT 639-4171. 1L An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the , improvement drawings. The plan shall :confor, ' to `Erosion, .06 Control Plans -- Technical Guidance Handbook, Kovember 1989. " 2. The applicant shall be required to connect the existing structure to the public sanitary sewer line. �� $•' Y 3. Storm drainage details shall be pravid :d as part of the public improvement plans Calculations and a topographic map of the storm drainage basin area shall be provided as a supplement to the public improvement. plans. Calculations shall be based on the full development of the serviceable area. '1 location and capacity- of existing, proposed, and future lines shall be addressed. 4 • 4. Standard half-street improvements, including, concrete sidewalk, driveway apron, curb, asphaltic concrete pavement, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, streetlights, and underground utilities shall be installed along SW Fir Street. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to ti. Local street standards and shall conform to the alignment of : existing adjacent improvements or to an alignment approved b y the Engineering Department. 5. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the SW Fir frontage 'to increase the right-of- , g it Street fr c NOTICE OF DECZSION �- SDR 91-0015 - GRECO/SHO1 YLER PACE I ....a x.u.,.v...... .. w...,w.:.. . ' i' i_. .._r....+a ..,.„.L«.. r....,.....-.F(+..,.C..k•.•r.iA:. .-. r air HuW-.,.! ..<H. a+N. •...a 4.wa.rF a4ra x. .,Y+.. • • C"'" way to 25 feet from the c;enterline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. • 6. The applicant shall install a sidewalk along the frontage of SW 72nd Avenue. 7. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the SW 72nd Avenue frontage to increase the right-of-- • way to 30 feet from the centerline, The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. : 8. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the S.W. 74 th Avenue frontage to increase the right- , of-way to 25 feet from the centerline. The description 4 shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. 9. An agreement shall be executed by the applicant, on forms provided by the'iCity, which waives the property owner'S right to oppose, or remonstrate against a future Local Improvement District formed to improve SW 74th Avenue. OCCUPANCY PERMITS WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL THE CONDITIONS LISTED BELOW ARE SATISFIED. 10. All landscape materials, site improvements and required public ii provements shall be installed as per the approved site plan. STAFF CONTACT: Ron Pomeroy, Planning Division, 639-4171. 11. Fire Hydrants are required within 250 feet of all portions of the structure measured around the outside and along all access roadways. Location approval will be coordinated with Tigard Water District. STAFF CONTACT: Gene Birchell, Tualatin Valley Fire District, 526-2502 IN ADDITION, THE APPLICANT SHOULD AWARE FOLLOWING �P� �+ ♦747.0 BE OF T � , SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. PLEASE NOTE: THIS IS NOT AN EXHAUSTIVE LIST a • 1. SECTION 18.120.060 - BONDING AND ASSURANCES A. On all projects where public improvements are required the Director shall: 1. � Fie o mount) not greater than 100 1 Require a bond �in��� an �amount not gr Condition of o t h e r eo fa the assuranceS as a P � � approval the completed p plan in order to ensure : � mpleted project is in ni ._ approved plan; and 2. confarance with t e a r Approve and release such bonds. » OF NOTICE ' ` O DECISION��� SIC)N �� � SDR 91-0015 - �GE.t.�COCSHC)NKWiIjER � �PAOE 2 4 B. The bond shall be, released when the Director finds the completed project conforms to the approved site development plan and all conditions of approval are. satisfied. 2. SECTION 18.164 , - STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS A. 1 r 1, 7� �a O 0 Streets 1. Street Cross Sections: a. Surface material shall be of Class C or B �" asphaltic concrete; b. The final lift shall be placed on all new construction roadways prior to City final o acceptance of the roadway; however, not before 90 percent of the structures in the new development are completed unless three years have elapsed since initiation of construction in the development. c. The final lift shall be Class B' asphaltic concrete as defined by A.P.W.AS standard specification C' d. No lift shall be less than 1-1/2 inches in thickness. � B. Y .164.120 - Utilities . 1. All utility lines including, but not limited to, E' those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities durin g construction, and high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above. C. 18. 164.180 - Notice to City Required . 1. Work shall not begin until the Ci ty ha s been notified in advance. 2. If work is discontinued,ed far any reason, it shall not be resumed until the City iC ncti f ied 3. A .• e removal permit shall be obtained from the Planning V Yi �, r the e removal of an._ tree on the s ,� tree Department prior to 1z � site ,. bF 91-0 0 15 GRECOI ER PAGE• NOTICE OF t�EC::�,SZC�1 S Siid�I�:W1L- 3 v a A ti ,? a • • •, : i , � Nut.. Y ` �. which is greater than 6 inches in diameter when measured at four feet from grade. STAFF CONTACT: Victor Adonri, Planning Department, 639-4171. 4. Sign permits are required prior to the installation of any sign of the site. Sign permits may be obtained through the { ' Planning Department. STAFF CONTACT: Victor Adonri, Planning Department, 639-4171. SECTION I1 - FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. Vicinity Information r The subject parcel is located on the southwest quadrant of the intersection of SW 72nd Avenue and SW Fir Street. " Southwest 74th Avenue abuts this site on its' western edge. This site is bordered on the east and south by properties which are zoned C;;P (Commercial Professional) . The property to the north is zoned R-25 (Residential, 25 units per acre) The property to the west is zoned R-4.5 (Residential, 4.5 ' units per acre) and is developed with the . 2. Site Information and Proposal Description As stated by the applicant, the subject property is currently improved by a single family residence which is approximately 1360 square feet in size) , a 352 square foot detached garage, an 80 square foot tool shed and a 143 square foot 07111 house. The residence is currently served , by a septic tank-drain field, and aa domestic water well. There are a variety of deciduous and evergreen trees located around the perimeter of the site. Access to the property is currently from SW 72nd Avenue near the corner of SW Fir Loop and SW 72nd Avenue G , The applicant requests Site Development Review approval to allow the conversion of a 1,360 square foot professional single family residence into off ices. This development is proposing to provide parking in the northeastern ern portion of the site. � . 3. Agency and NPO Comments The Engineering`n o Division has s reviewed the request a nd provides the following commen ts. 1. STREETS: The site is located on the southwest corner of SW 72nd with is 2nn' and n three sides with u� lic roads; that nd k'ir Street. The .� 'n it� is fronted o p ; �on the east by SW 72nd Avenue, on the north by SW Fir Street, and on the west by SW 74th Avenue 1 DECISION - ONXW �ISi� D OF I(l�T' S i N T - I� ��. 0015 �G�Efi; �'LER PAGE r I i yy «..., ..._,...„.;:,,;e(1 ...rn-......« «.--+. r a.r....I.a.,.M , .f..n.«4.................„. •,.-.,. ., ,..--.., ... .:..iw.. ....-,.,......,-m:M.:... L.m,...»....lrm»..,.i.l.,..1.,.. .,..W:r....I,. ..'-aY�-.e. .{:.......,..-1.,,.»-+r...n-tir:,..r..::...w......,::,.:l...x.,....._,.I....1L'..:.«....,:..,.....aa..,...1--...y.t._..rra..a.4,lal . Southwest 72nd Avenue is classified as a major collector and carries the following standards; 60 feet of right-of-way and 44 feet of pavement. Currently the . portion of SW 72nd. Avenue which is adjacent to the site is fully improved except for sidewalks. The right-of- way in front of the site varies from 21 to 25 feet from centerline. There is an access driveway from 72nd into the site. Chapter 18.108.060 of the Community Development Code, limits direct individual access to arterial and collector streets. Since the site has access to local streets (Fir and 74th Avenue) the access point from SW 72nd Avenue should be abandoned. The applicant has shown on the preliminary plan that the access to the site will be from SW Fir Street and that the access to SW 72nd Avenue will be closed. Therefore, the applicant should be required to do the following: u A. Dedicated additional right-of-way to 30 feet from centerline along SW 72nd Avenue frontage; , D. Install a sidewalk along the frontage of SW 72nd Avenue; and C. Abandon the access point along SW 72nd Avenue. Southwest Fir Street is classified as a local street with the following standards; 50 feet of right-of-way and 34 feet of pavement. Currently the portion of SW Fir! Street which is adjacent to the site is fully improved on the north side, including sidewalks. On the south side of Fir Street the pavement width varies. There is an extruded curb and 20 feet of right-of-way. • Therefore, the applicant should be required to do the following: A. Dedicate additional right-of-way to 25 feet from centerline along the SW Fir Street Frontagei, and B. Provide half-street improvements alon g., the frontage of SW Fir Street. Southwest 74th Avenue is also classified as a local street.e . Currently SW 74th has Improvements along street Cur 7 4 s ' no .m�► frontage of this site. The Development Code allows the Director to accept a °non-Mremonstrance° for the certain criteria as improvements i f e s�.te meets specified in Section 1$..164 .030. This site meets the following criteria under Section 18.164.030: Additional planning work is required xed tc� define the appropriate design standards for the street, NOTICE OF DECISION L SPR 91-0015 - ORECO/SHON ILER PAGE 5 • I i r 1 r 1 t and the application is for a project which would contribute only a minor portion of the k anticipated future traffic on the street. Therefore, the applicant should be required to do the following: A. Sign a non-remonstrance agreement for the future improvements alon g SW.74th Avenue, and B. Dedicate additional right-of-way to 25 feet from centerline along the SW 74th Avenue frontage. 2. SANITARY SEWER: There are two existing public sanitary sewer lines that abut this property; an 8 inch line in SW Fir Street and an 8 inch line in SW 72nd Avenue. Based on the "as-builts", both lines appear to be of adequate site and e 'depth to serve the �site; a �. a the applicant 'oh applicant's engineer should field verify this information prior to the start of any work. The existing single family residence is currently connected to a septic system. The applicant is requesting that the converted office be allowed to � g remain connected until such time as further development, system failure or tern years, whichever occurs first. It is the City's policy that for commercial/office development, the site is required to connect to the public system prior to occupancy (if a public system is available) . This policy is consistent with Unified Sewerage,Agency regulations that require sewer connection for structures within 300 feet of a public line. Therefore, the applicant should be required to connect to the available public sanitary sewer system. 3. STORM SEWER: There e r are existing public storm g p rm sewer lines available in SW Fir and SW 72nd Avenue. Again, both lines appear to be of adequate size and depth to serve the applicant or applicant's engineer fie ld verify this information p rior to the start of any work onsite . ired to connect a PP h�.beubli� work. The applicant shoal any :ite storm system to the public system. " Tigard Tiding D- n has reviewed The City of 'Ts,g Bu• Division this proposal and has offered the following comments: 1 A bui ldin g p e rmit will ll be required fo r cha rages to the existing tin g res enc e. The building shall be required to conform to the s tandards Set forth for a commercial building. These "standards shall include but not be NOTICE :., 91-0015 ,. O�IL�:ER FAC.� 6 • CE OF DEC�;�I�N SDR G�tEC�/�,H 11 I I - 4 .. ....,..,..__..• .. ........4..-.w.v_..L .,..,...._...-.»..•...,._ _. ......,... ,...I;., ..- _ -;_,,. ........._•._.._l'..,i.,,.,u..w..,..........,.al.,„«............-n-.r...,....,.-..-,._i...-,-..,•x..,« ...,._........L1..y..•..r..........»....,.«u .k.x....- . 4.:.w,6,....»».....,,._Jd«.w.W-n.:i...tw..._......a _. •... ,. limited to) : ramps, stairs, exits, bathroom facilities, fire extinguishers, glazing subject to impact and demonstration that the building is structurally able to support the design loads for such office use. If the existing well is not to be used, it should be properly capped-off as required b y the Washington County Watermaster. • The handicapped parking in g stall shall have a width dth of 16 feet (9 foot stall with 6 foot access aisle) . With the implementation of the American Disabilities Act (ADA) , it is suggested that the applicant give consideration to providing accessibility into the building, and the use of the toilet -facilities. It may be. required/as part of the ADA. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: Fire hydrants are required within 250 feet of all portions of the structure measured around the outside and along access roadways. Location approval will b1 coordinated with Tualatin Valley Water District. General Telephone has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: The developer should contact GTE Engineering Office, for requirements. Allow 45 days lead time from completion of GTE Engineering review to trench open date. Columbia Cable has reviewed this proposal and has offered. the following coxaments p Please contact Columbia Cable for pre-wire • specif ications The City of Tigard Operations Department, and Portia')' •• �' �' potations� I General Electric have reviewed this proposal and have issued , no comments or objections No other comments have been received. C. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION Section Community Development Code n 18 6 of the C.ommun� v�e10 me f » ” a De (CDC) 4 contains the dimensional requirements for the C-P zone. The . subject property is 4 2160 square feet which greatly excee ds ue 6,000 squar e foot minimum required. Additionally, the 61 0015 G , . • NOTICE OF DECISION CDR 0 • • � OI`� '-� �1: � 1�EC �S�OI�KWI�E�I PAGE o � • 1 136 foot lot width far exceeds the 50 foot required minimum. This code section also allows a maximum building height of 45 feet in this zone. The applicant states that the current height of the building-(approximately 22 feet) will not be ry.. I changed. The minimum landscaping requirement is 20 percent for this zone. Only a relatively small portion of this site is will be covered by, impervious surfaces. The balance of I the property is either already d landscaped ed or covered b natural, vegetation. The applicant proposes to add additional birch, cherry and plum trees around the perimeter of the site in addition, to numerous shrubs. Section 18..64.05.0 of the •C-P zoning district regulations requires minimum setbacks for uses developed sites in this �� � U " zone as follows: rear- yard - 20 feet where the C-P zone abuts a residential district, side yard setback - 20 feet where the C-P zone abut s a residential district. The western boundary of this site abuts an R-3.5 r' (Residential, 3.5 units per acre) zoning district and therefore shall be required to maintain a 20 foot rear yard setback. Additionally, the north ,Fide of this site abuts an R-25 (Residential, 25 units per acre) zoning district and therefore shall be required to maintain a 20 foot side yard setback. The submitted site plan shows setbacks of approximately 220 feet on the west side (rear yard) and �> approximately 18 feet on the north lot line (�s ide yard) Code Section 18. 132.040 11„ (Nonconforming Structures) states that A structure, or placement of a structure on the ` lot, may be determined to be legally nonconforming if the structure was in existence at the effective hate of either the adoption or amendment of this title. The last revision 1 of this section of Title 18 (CDC) was February 27, 19 89 From even a cursory site visit it is plainly evident that this garage has been in existence prior the 1989. Therefore, e r� f ore, .this garage is determined by staff to be legally nonconforming and thereby subject to the provisions governing such nonconforming structures as, listed in Section 18.1. 32.040( .,. This code section has been satisfied. Section 18.106.030(C) (1) (Minimum Off-Street Parking 1' , Requirements - Administrative and Professional Services) 1 r requires one parking space for each 350 square feet of gross ;' floor space. The office building is proposed to be 1,360 t,r square feet i n area. An office building of this size would . require the provision of a minimum of four (4) parking spaces. �h � z plan indicat es that 5 p parking spaces wi ll be provided. Therefor e the' preliminary site plan meets the number of parking spaces required to satisfy the Code requirements. 1. . N0TICE OF DECISION - SCR 91-0015 - CRECC /SFOTYIER PAGE '8 • • State of Oregon House, Bill 2084, which became effective September 1, 1990, requires one disabled person parking �r spaces if 6 to 25 parking spaces are provided. The proposed plan provides for the one da:sabled person parking space which is required. Therefore, this code requirement has been satisfied. Code Section 18. 7,06.020 lJ requires one bicycle parking space for each 15 vehicle parking spaces in any development. Since there are only 5 parking spaces to be provided on this site, one bicycle parking space is required. The site plan does indicate that a bicycle parking rack is to be provided on this site. Therefore, this code requirement has been met., The applicant proposes to cover the parking ng lot with gravel for a "temporary period of time until the property is fully developed in five/to ten years. " Cor'e Section 188.10 C 4 1 0 . states: { Except for . e » temporary uses" as authorized by subsection 3 below, all areas used for the parking or storage or maneuvering of any vehicle, boat or trailer shall be improved with asphalt or concrete surfaces according to the same standards required for the construction and acceptance of City streets. e referenced Subs refers The ahoy ference �.�t�.en► 3 refer to temporary uses as defined Section, 18.140 (Temporary Uses) An approved Temporary Use Permit must be applied for and obtained in order to utilize this code exception. Additionally, temporary uses are valid for only 12 months. The proposed use on this site is not a Temporary Use and does not qualify to utilize this exception. Therefore, the parking area, on the subject site shall be paved according to City standards. The site meets the minimum access standards through the ' I Streetion of one 24 foot wide c�on 18.108.080(A)ss driveway from SW Fir Code S _ requires that a commercial development with a parking area providing between 0 and 99 parking spaces be provided with an access d i.ve with a minimum access width �f 3 0 f ee t o Tie a Cces sway mu st be paved to a ,rnimu width of 24 feet. The applicant is F ` proposing a pa ged 24 foot wide paved accessway and therefore satisfies this access requirement. Code Section on 18. 10 050{2a. requires that within all , commercial developments, walkways shall extend from the . ground floor entrances to the streets which. provide the re qu ired access and a g re s s. The prop osed si plan indicat es that ped n acCe88 to the main of the proposed office will be p rovided by a sidewalk leading to NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 91-0015 � ���Q�S�dNKT1LF� PAGE F n P �r .. .,.-,,. -•, ,.w.,,.a,_ ,,., -..:. . - _,--.•-..........._.......,...4w:..,.,......._«,,,.4r.,..,..,.6 t,«.:z..>....,,.m.a..._ m:;:.,.w.>._a.....„,'..:..w..:...:_;:sw.;..=.-..... .-, -....>..k.,s:..,...o«:. .r Although vehicular traffic the SW 72nd Avenue� frontage. Al g will access the site from SW Fig Street, the main pedestrian access point will be from SW 72nd Avenue. The parking area is connected to the 'office building by a porch and handicapped access ramp. Therefore, this code requirement has been satisfied. Section 18.102 (Visual Clearance Areas) requires that a o, clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all r property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruct 7 on exceeding 3 feet in height, except that obstructions " may be located in this area shall be visually clear between 3 and 8 feet in height. Visual clearance areas shall be that triangular area formed by measuring a 30 foot distance along each of the right -of-way or property lines and then connecting these two 30 foot distance points with a straight line. The proposed development conforms with all visual clearance requirements of this code section. In addition, the applicant has taken vision clearance into account in the submitted landscaping plan. Chapter 10.1500 requires a permit and contains standards for removal of trees having a trunk 6 inches or more in diameter four feet above the ground on undeveloped land. A permit for tree removal must comply with the following criteria: a. The trees are diseased, present a . danger to property, or interfere with utility service or A traffic safety; b. The trees have to be removed to construct proposed improvements or to otherwise utilize the applicant's property in a reasonable manner; • c . .The trees are not needed to prevent erosion, instability, or drainage problems; d. The are not needed to protect nearby tree e trees ar p y� es as windbreaks or as a desirable balance between shade and open space; , • e. The aesthetic character in the area will not be H visually adversely affected the tree removal; el b, y and f. New vegetation planted, by the appli cant,.ant, if any, will replace the aesthetic value of trees to be i c•ui . .w NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 91-0015 GRECO/SHONKWILER PACE 1 • • ..-r.,. .,,. .-.,»+-..F-.' ., ...:J ,x......w.....-..«..,n A...w.A.,.F:....lt•.... .eN... .....-......Ji.,a...W.,.....w.a....:Jr....H....a....,...,...r,..+,,r i•.,wn.-....i.,.«rn...oti.«.,.«»L..;. .0 aw, The preliminary site plan does not indicate that any x' trees will need to be removed. Rather, the applicant has stated that the existing perimeter trees which abut the adjacent streets are intended to be counted toward the minimum street tree requirement. If it seems to become necessary to remove a tree, no tree removal shall be ellowed to occur prior to Planning Division staff review and approval of a tree removal permit. Section 18. 100.035 (Street Trees) list the criteria for the maximu m spacing of street trees along public rights-of-way. The landscaping plan proposes to . utilize those perimeter trees which currently exist as part of the minimum street tree requirement. The applicant also proposes to plant additional street • P �4 • trees at site. The street trees as shown on the ,• this site landscaping plan surpass the requirements of this code section. Therefore, this section has been satisfied. ; Section 18. 114.130(D) (Signs) list the allowable signs and sign area f or the C-P zone. TLa a applicant .ro�ses ';.. to locate one freestanding sign along SW 72nd Avenue approximately 60 feet from the corner of SW 72nd Avenue and SW Fir Street. The proposed sign will be less than eight feet in height and will not exceed 32 square feet per face. The proposed signage seems to fit within the allowable sign height, placement and area for this site. All signs shall be approved through the Sign Permit process as administered by the Planning Division. ' Ear• DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director's designee for City of Tigard has APPROVED Site Development Review SDR 91-0015 subject to the conditions listed in Section I. 1' THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE FINAL DECISION DATE NOTED BELOW. D. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was Notice: published in the newspaper,' posted at City Hall and mailed to: _4_,The applicant and owners Owners of record within the required distance '', The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization .Affected g g government agencie ,, n o I Final 1 Decisio r . THE DECISION N SHALL BE FINAL O N 1 UNLESS AN APPEAL 18 PILED. NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 91.-0015 -, GRECO/SHONXWILER PAGE 11 r: � _ � - -,. ....rala»Nny.,».»-,.1-t iw.«..yuAk4 tY_.>�.F:�wF.:[}Yt'urJ Fi.:tn..+AU4KWr'.m...:'.a.C`J..t+}.lU-..,wa'wilr:LWJ1.:x�Sn..V��..wmnx«o.+.�W a.a�a....�a_.. iM • wl • Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. Appeal fey schedule and forms are available at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon. • The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 p.m. !2-q-q • ri 4. Questions: If you have questions, please call City of Tigard Planning Department, City of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon. AP) V • ___LV::21:7. If PREPARED BY: Ron Pomeroy DATE Assistant Planner ir APPROVED BY: Dick Bewersdor DATE Senior Plarine •I; A rp\SDR91-15.DEC 1 I I I 1' • 1 I I, 1 • NOTICE OF DECISION - HDR 91-0015 - GRECO/SHONKWILER PAGE 12 r 1 `ypY ,.n. ..... ... w••,.. 1 ....1...,. •.'., ,«n>..,.•««r.....•.e.n.y•....•,...,. r_.. ,.,,.,.�.., ..,..x..... .��..••,. ;,.�.,.. ......a 1.., .. ire.. .,,,..n.,,• .. ,.0 ...� .....�... ....... .• .••r :..•• n •...., ...rn. ....n•,.-.. .1•�ue� • ' _ �'. . _ _- - - ToSF L_____I- - II-`'\.....,....1'7""S;1114, . 11.1 The C1t of,_ ____ ____ _ (S1).- t• -- - _LT_ ____ .... :. : __ ,__ ._-_ __. _ . _ _ r, - - 1--' --.- I— _-- - 3DR di V jL� 1 - 0015- \ - - - AR,\S S I r 1-------- • I • -!WARNS --- _ • 5P __ _ _ -�-- L_ _ -- - -- S-i to Area 1111 I \,j__El__EiL,- ,\. . _ . ___- • - -- __.MK . - . _ - 7: ' ' _ --I- _ iml _ - t , _ . _ _. .,-., ,_. _ ,__. ___ t: . iri\FIRr , . _ .__ ,___ . is �' " r • •s - 0 _ Li" j L i ..__ < - _.; - 1 - l'[......i ` - - 1 DR- AD" Rr- - - _-- - �- .l r,. Li. _ _ - il - . . i_ ____ __ t D10tai la-ta i sty icptcs. - - - Attica caaptle! by tic City - ai Iilatl atiliiA' Gse{ra- r i � phie tolornt ias System -= — i; GIS) sattvus, 1101:- t = (� �^c^t p - et- - mat patitsiti Ictc•\\,-, _ _ r � sf t I�EI.J ER J.!i�x_t _ t na+e{tc.!Il.all liaeai — t ` r _ - igl:rps-tttlisi {c tt f, DR - � - . cs l+tstaiccl y t _ I . - hilli . / liPst Iilat l. ( tsj ♦- . ' .,....tip d.. , MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Dick Bewc do Senior Planner FROM: Cathy Wheatley, City Recorder D2) December 3, 1991 SUBJECT: Appeal - SDR 91-0015 (Greco/Shonkwiler) Dick, attached is an appeal received this morning from Mr. Shonkwiler with regard to the Director's Decision for the above- • referenced case. Once you have determined the Planning Commission , . . hearing date, please notify the appellant and other interested parties. Thanks. r c: Ed Murphy h appeal t 1 ■ 1. it r r 1' ' ;1�tt ..". .a...—....-, 4:.«.:a�... 1 Y> -, .,34 u..Yx._r..s uAy.;,.,A.:,.:.... .du..wm..,..ii+..4,;w.pv.,:.»...•..w.7d1F,:.aiY:_:...--,Ula..rH .I. . ,Yw+•'a,-...,dl• ,MPSa.a�•-m�wr.^-t•e.,•;c.*uw «,wnfr,�wwa..««,,.a.+w.r.wWlww�Y+.Fr..Wrt;,'skb':4Gia•?a».:rW9,.sYJ:w1,4'ta.1L.:u;'Y',YPSr'''•..'iWU«.P'�•�t^Mr'.!,JI':'F r+'!'L!"",'a'"` ... 'VJ•l.+�Wlw:tawny'Ir,•+•++-glMJrh"�.•..1a:»ri+,y Ja?"+'fwJ"";Nl4.MW'S Prrt+�-!.,..r+l _J' ._ hi' H 1 — (:),F �,c�, 'I" - aaP�, ..' !�•,1wi1r1"+fI P{��n�rr''FI,.r • P l ! $�Y c)',iR@,s 'tYYA; ' . '. �i,�3 n;t1 (4IP fLYI •'' 'c 1`� ,``+ ' �: 1:����;::��w k'',,; s�, jai�x4,����� '�I`»`r�t�l '��'?'�(��'����ij�'t;C�4�F'{"�� �'�;.�/ w.k""3'�H ��''�a`�� �� � �f[���3�'". 51��'�,`L���'� 9� �'�»w�"''��'��.�rv,�;��, '�IWI"Pd�b�•w. Sul d 1 1:m Wu�p.7 w {�i� i.1,a vS 'M ,J.9Y:•9 , �1yp;,s, Ypyq QW ��Nj� yq�, ,�,+�y7�,.nJ�r q9 7µ, V�gp�( }!{yp 1p P) pp,, pP�, r�{ .y�P ry 1{/yrlt.A�1T.. +Py� +Pw y) P �J.ry�P,.�},/ �µnY yq�'1yP+L y� r7 �y 'tt yP pp• ryy,{i , �4 "I,SY" 'SYIfi`MMI,, '•W F �h,e��'"I(l,'PI J'•rN Hi'� e 1 7"N,� I+V t"�P 7•r!'+ 1/; w` A^t i!'0.�'x� b Vn OF" •r•a�1 i,f''+'4"'s'i 1,R"1"Y F�s2Y'� :.1 A"M141„ 4�i"h"1d,� ,�'' AYn}f MYNfWwoVOTI MSY11,014W In. NMIW.Y.,MIS,/IY.M11nYM"gPM'Ma,t11WY.YIiMxi IOW MI dHYGw,»oYNMN,IWH1,•4, F1l INMYNIM'4YHW'/l+,W♦V1H�,W*Yt�11i41N.,,IPIWIr.4l,�M °MwM*...YINI.iell.H,+a,Y;d4YYK 14,Mlon,,"M'I r r 0 t a I r . I 1 I 1 • I 1 *r A PT t LYL, 'ttvi(11,1 I P "i° — Y F .r ' ...... .ru Y.,.w..� .._,4.M..sYYw4} IWrF4nw Y,whr L.1'Mn•••MN.x+,we,u"1,Y.,.Y.+.p.,,W Y.ly NWY••rY wuiW'+-�M,N"w.rMl+'-w'vw JIN,,.,..,r.,Y•Nr�,• o • i Bw. .AYg; I I •, • LAND USE DECISION APPEAL FILING . o • The City of Tigard supports the citizen's right to • « � �r fir; . participate in local government. `i igard s Land Use 1puipiiq�t,f Coda therefore sets out specific requirements for .;:,..,., 10;;, ( � fil.ing.appeals 'on certain land use decisions. � �� :Of 716,74;:* The following form has been developed to assist you in }• EGON filing an appeal of a land use decision in 'proper ' •ti,. form To determine what filing foes wxl.l be required ... or to answer any questions you have regarding the appeal process, please contact the Planning Division ion or the City Recorder at 639«..ATi ry APPLICATION BEING APPEALED: D R ECC) /,51 c )&J x.110 k 1..x S 6. ` . . l�V .© Vfl r ° e _ _0‘! l ($bi .9t - oO! 2. HOW DO .YOU QUALIFY Ate; A PARTY: ,4 p d-,1,C d0(-!J f S' ot"Z 91 "° 1, 3. SPECIFIC GROUNDS FOR APPEAL OR REVIEW; 4 e /J /\)O, 4)110Z.GiVl E!ts'. P y' r L«wh...»4. ,1„..y»AN" 66- M.) i) . AM•EIU PE)) ..."F"YGw //II Q.L...1..D... ... .O c <L .E. tit. g..a.....c? .. ..g.p gmt ...,L5i his .1- sf a L... . A- 114 t raE ,. . ,. .. t, (.._ (6...a. 1 .e. C� .br_L� �««« `�1 , ref EM I . OF -A1 DA. :1 w 14.4. . - S ME `f. .rifrt eAmE-> r * . r L" , 1 D "". ''1 _. pr: ,RELQ? "I.Ir'E: 7J1 0l 1.'�... j.W L..7°" 74:v .. .a „fe_c, i p. v . 12,gq2/.1..e.c33-' L f C4 'k.h CAP r , ()c J/ _�_. .: 1hAS. .�--�� ! =� , , �C-� "« aGt1.l7 1 '� r ' S 4. SCHEDULED DATE DECISION IS TO BE FINAL: • 5. DATE NOTICE or FIN• L DECISION WAS GIVE ill s 6, 5 .CNriTURE( ) ; II�: ».�.., t� t�«. u� °�2:.� ��a ,..►...:. „". W.(14.„ MM..".w"..r....w«. .w.r 46.4 - C.'4 �'ordCz 1, • w.."......» .•!' .wryw.«....,.W.1.««".+...f..«:..+wf.1... ..,..f.1i...L..ur....W..w+{J......"ww.J 4 FOR 4FFICr USE ONLY: Received By 1'� i- �^�_l ( �° D a: (4/q t: Time ifi;1ggern 1 Ap r ov d' A To Form Dy t. " 1,�,�:��., r�i,1°e rn Date; •/�- ��.._7..««...~r1rift;; 1"C04,,. {� .., 1.-... ..w....«.+.ww.ww«�w.u......�.-.+".. 1 wIM. 7 I SA I)wiiied As To Form 8y ,�^"... 1)a ; "f' .me �..i"" r�.u..y."«.".rw....w.w..l�.....u...w.....' ��ww.«.ua.«wws+.+.w.«......« +1"..rw".:.� '"� r 1 c e:�r�t; No J«J� j /...— �"),�. r«._«• s��..� .«..«,.._J«...w A It1l�U r „�. ,:` ;4..,»»;...�._ 13'?5SVHall 131vd,,P,a Box 23397 Tigard,Oregon g.7223 (503)63 H 4 71 I I �I. fir'` • —_.,,.,,.. .. w, -i.;w_,..-.,,,.........,,-...,.,..,.mow.«.....,.,..,..,..a„__...,,.._........r o,,,,i..,..r......:1...............r.4..a.w-,_.......«.�,......._,--X+., , ......,....., ...._F,+..,._.+..»_....,... ..,....»»».....,._..n..+....... — ........,..«_-.,u.Y..;»a4:.,_-«_....f..,...,.,.....,_,. .yn.., ..:...,i. +,.,- ,:-'.i.:..:.;,«-i.«„,..:. ..,,.. CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION . SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 91-0015 GRECO/SHONKWILER OWNER/APPLICANT APPLICATION: A for Site Development Review w approval to allow the conversion of a 1,360 square foot single family residence into professional offices with related site improvements. Zoning: C-P (Commercial Professional) Location: 13425 SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 2S1 1DC tax lot 100) . The C-P zoning designation allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, real estate and business support services among other uses. SECTION I - DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director's designee for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section II: ;r S' O' N€ �ICE 3.1�ITS?:;` WILL 'NOT., 'BE 'ISSUED UNTIE" THE CONDITIONS LISTED BELOW ARE SATISFIED. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, PLEASE CONTACT CHRIS DAVIES IN THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AT 639-4171. 1. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the improvement drawings. The plan shall p �' p h 11 conform to "Erosion Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, November 1909 . 2. The applicant shall be required to connect the existing structure to the public sanitary sewer line 3. storm 'drama e et g d ails shall be provided as part of the • public improvement, plans. Calculations and a topographic map of the storm drainage basin area shall be provided as a supplement to the public improvement plans. Calculations shall be ba sed on the full development of the serviceable area. The 1 future ' ocatior� and capacity of existing, proposed, and lines shall be addressed. , 4. Standard half-street improvements, including concrete h 4 sidewalk, driveway apron, curb, asphaltic concrete pavement, sanitary sewer storm drainage,, streetlights, and underground d utilities shall be installed along SW Fir Street. Improvements shall.ll be designed and constructed, to Local street .standards and shall l conform to the alignment nt of existin g adjacent ice rovemehts or to an alignment approved by th e Eng ineerin g De partment 5, Additional right-Of-way shall he dedicate d I to the public along the SW Fir St reet frontage to increase the NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 91-0015 - GRECC SH0NKWxLE R PAGE 1 • 1 a,+,o»+,-K•..n.w ..,..«......w,,..... .«,....,,.. .......,aw,.....>ty,> id..:-,a,•....aw r.....,t,....r..,..r-.U-..,.«w..m.,-- ,.--..:1.«u,.,.)..,.r,.,u,.r'-L,..„f.-,.r.Y-+..,.,,.Hu'..U_..G.....,.•H..a'.,..,NJ�on,.t. ..,..ri«.,.. {z.....:a,.,'..',_ ..4.....», m.....rw.._K:•r-+.«:.. A.4.,.,w-4rwti.a•.d..r...,F.:,t:r--,iG1.u..wt..'.:iww 7....+,m-r=.JJ U..f-...,»r;A, .n' • way to 25 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of--way centerline. 6. The applicant shall install a sidewalk along the frontage of SW 72nd Avenue. 7. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the SW 72nd Avenue frontage to increase the right-of- ` way to 30 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. 8. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the S.W. 74th Avenue frontage to increase the right- of-way to 25 feet from the centerline. The description • shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. 9. An agreement shall be executed by the applicant, on forms provided by the City, which waives the property owners right to oppose or remonstrate against a future Local Improvement District formed to improve SW 74th Avenue. OCCUPANCY PERMITS WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL THE CONDITIONS LISTED BELOW APE SATISFIED. 10. All landscape materials, site improvements and required public improvements shall be installed as per the approved site, plan. STAFF CONTACT: Ron Pomeroy, Planning Division, 639-4171. 11. Fire Hydrants are required within 250 feet of all portions of the structure measured around the outside and along all access roadways.. Location approval will be coordinated with y pP r District. . • Birchell, Tigard Water ' STAFF CQNTACT: Gene Tualatin Valley Fire District, 526-2502 IN ADDITION, r THE . APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING j SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. PLEASE NOTE: THIS IS NOT AN EXHAUSTIVE LIST. 1. SECTION 12 a.060 - BONDING AND ASSURANCES A. On all projects where er e pub lic imp. ro vemeris are required the Director shall: 1. Require a bond in amount 9f n. an mo nt not greater than 100 •a• percent of other adequate a assurances a nces as a condition of approval of site develo pment plan in order to ensure compl eted • project is in conformance w�:d th the, approved plan; and 2. Approve rove and release p p ease such bonds • I NoTIDE OF DECISION � SDR 91-0015 " GRECO/SEO TLER PAGE 2 •, . ii4A ,_».„,_...,._.....,,..„ .,,.I.,..a...« .-,.,....._«..,..i.....,....,..,«w,...a.,.-.,.-..n_....,,M_,,.,_. v,..._..._.u.,.L-__............«.,...5.....,_+,..._....,,.,...,_....,.. .., ...,...,,«..,.«.=,1 ...,.,...... _......-....,.. . ..,,..,: _.»a..,_,.,. ....w...,_4-: ,...w..,;.: ......I.,, ..i.H....: .«1.,:.ri.M l.,na:r., w , , . f 4" B. The bond shall be released when the Director finds the completed project conforms to the approved site development plan and all conditions of approval are ,C satisfied. 2. SECTION 18. 164 - STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS .. : A. 18.164.00 1 Streets Street Sections. a. Surface material shall be of Class C or B asphaltic concrete; b. The final lift shall be placed on all new o construction roadways prior to City final acceptance of the roadway; however, not before 90 M of the e structures in the new development J'; are completed unless three years have elapsed Since ' i11AtAat:LUTI. of construction An the development. c. The final lift shall be Class B asphaltic 1 f concrete as defined by A.P.W.A. standard specification d. No lift shall be less than 1-1/2 it ihes in thickness. B. 18.164. 120 -- Utilities 1. All o utility �.. 1 nE's' 1, including, but not limited to Y �'o to, those required for electric, comimunication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted tans formers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, and high is capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above. C. 18.164. 1 80 -- Notice to Required 1. Work shall not begin until the ntil City y h as been notified in advance. 2. If work r not be���es�zn.ecicunt�:l,��detc�r any shall reason, it sh the City"a,ty As notified. 3. A tre e removal permit m it shall be obtained from t he Planning Department prior to . of any the site which i an tree on wh s greater than 6 inc ein diameter when measured at the removal NOTICE oil DECISION - SDr` 91,-0015 CARE HO]NIWILER RAGE 3 ' 4 .Li.:...........,.u.•.........,.. �,-«......._a-:..,., ,1w.-....._...-i+.:..-:,. .•..i.._.J.. ':rw.r....a.,•..,-w...•_../...t-_,:=.....`!.1.::.,i..«.a.,•ir.,.--r...�.»,,,.. rf':..•.,.A.......uJ;,:J';.....-;,YJ��...- .....t,..,. ..,...M,:s.,:.+-... «.r.n.r...k.....w,µA-J_:l.wa..,..,.a.»,...,:.t,....rw..w...i...1:T,:c;•iaw+, .f.....t, • • fou r feet from grade. STAFF CONTACT: Victor Adonri, Planning Department, 639-4171. 4. Sign permits are required prior to the installation of any sign of the site. Sign permits may be obtained through the Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Victor Adonri, Planning Department, 639--417.1. SECTION II -- FINDINGS. OF FACT: 1. Vicinity Information The subject parcel is located on the southwest quadrant of the intersection of SW 72nd Avenue and SW Fir Street. Southwest 74th Avenue abuts this site on its' western edge. This site is bordered on the east and south by properties j which are zoned C-P (Commercial Professional) The property •• to the north is zoned R-25 (Residential, 25 units per acre) . The property to the west as zoned ed R 4..5 (Residential, 4.5 • units per acre) and is developed with the ` . ' 2. Site information and Proposal Description As stated by the applicant, the subject property is currently improved by a single family residence which is approximately 1360 square feet in size) , a 352 square foot detached garage, an 80 square foot tool shed and a 143 square foot will house. The residence is currently served by a septic tank-drain field, and as domestic water well. y p � r There are a variety of deciduous and evergreen trees located around the perimeter of the site. Access to the property is currently from SW 72nd Avenue near the corner of SW Fir Loop and SW 72nd Avenue. The applicant requests Site Development Review approval to allow the conversion of a 1,360 square foot single family residence into professional offices. This development is ro ok in to provide p p � �` parking in the northeastern portion of ` the site: f 3. Agency d. g y and NPO Comments The Engineering Division has reviewed the request and provides the following comments 1. STREETS: The site is located on the southwest corne r of SW 72nd ron.tetl onir Street. The site roads; on that s '�.. public sides with is unique ue,in the three eastar s and o the west Avenue,SW 74th Avenue. y aeet on the north b... SW by r Fir St NOTICE Or DECISION -- SbR 91-0015 - GRECG/SRONKWIL'R PAGE 4 0 fir, ......_.x u. ..+«.,,«.,.-«,,....r.....,,,,,.'.a«.,..,...,.---....,,..+r..0...-...,«..,.,...-._.......,...,....i_..,....,.. ._.ru...m.._....,,_...-H..,,_wa.........., ., ,..r«....M-..,,,,.,,it........d...`...,i,'.ii...r..,.,..,a.i H,«..,..,w.«'...--.a;.'. ...,,.A.-.m,L.,n...,,.%...au.«.w:.'+ ..„....,.......:.L:ai i..+.i...M.i,'..._ a.«.:d..M.:..e, Southwest 72nd Avenue is classified as a major collector and carries the following standards; 60 feet of right-of-way and 44 feet of pavement. Currently the r portion of SW 72nd Avenue which is adjacent to the site • is fully improved except for sidewalks. The right-of- way in front of the site varies from 21 to 25 feet from centerline. There is an access driveway from 72nd into the site Chapter 10. 108.060 of the Community Development Code, limits direct individual access to } ; arterial and collector streets. Since the site has access to local streets (Fir and 74th Avenue) the access point from SW 72nd Avenue should be abandoned. The applicant has shown on the preliminary plan that the access to the site will be from SW Fir Street and 0' that the access to SW 72nd Avenue will be closed. Therefore, the applicant should be required to do the following i A. Dedicated additional right-of-way to 30 feet from centerline along SW 72nd Avenue frontage; B. Install a sidewalk along'the frontage of SW 72nd Avenue; and C. Abandon the access point along SW 72nd Avenue. Southwest Fir' Street is classified as a local street with the following standards; 50 feet of right-.of-way of W and 34 feet of��pa cement. Currently the portion f � Fir Street which is adjacent to the site is fully , including sidewalks. On Lm proved on the north side, ludin nc p g the south side of Fir Street the pavement width varies. - There is an extruded curb and 20 feet of right-of-way. Therefore, the applicant should be required to do the followings A. Dedicate additional right-of-way to 25 feet from a,l centerline along the SW Fir Street Frontage, and B. Provide half- street improvements along the frontage of SW Fir Street, Southwest 74th Avenue is also classified as a local street. Currently SW 74th has no improvements along the frontage of this site. The bevelopment Code allows ImpDirector to accept non-remonstrance" for rovements if the A e meets improvements ts certain criteria as ' specified in Section 18.164.030. This site meets the following criteria under Section 18. 164.030: Additi onal s- planning work is required to define the appro r te design standards for the street, NOTICE OF DECISION ,� -=� �L?Ft 91-0015 -� CRECCJ SHONKWI1,ER PAGE 5 / � .....Mi.....,1.{.. .«,......«.r,....14..H....J n./.....,..,.. ..U..r...rt.w..a.n.,...-ww.....,+..,u,.A.._+,.• ....,..w.1.tL.n.......:.J:.+1-.I..•.-•,:M..1 L..+F n4.N. ,.w..wMn.Nd.»..,.nL.y..✓.Y.-+w,.MAw .--..M -..Fhk4,,....M'n _MN..I.,.a;4'....»4...ra w....+rn.......s..w.nr».M»YwMnv.w«...i..,n,,.,x.t/.1n.�.r •n.r..4r..w.e.4n:Af..nM.Vr.rvF.-S.Y...:w. and the application for project�lication is r a which would contribute only a minor portion of the anticipated future traffic on the street. Therefore, the applicant should be required to do the j„ •. following: Sigma non-remonstrance agreement for • the future improvements along SW.74th Avenue, and I I B).• Dedicate' additional right-of-way to 25 feet from , centerline along the SW 74th Avenue frontage. , 2. SANITARY SEWER: There are two existing public sanitary sewer lines that abut this ro ert • an 8 inch line in F F d l y SW Fir Street and an 8 inch line, in SW S 72nd Avenue. Based on the "as-builts", both lines appear to be of adequate size and depth to serve the site; the applicant or applicant's engineer should field verify . this information prior to the start of any work. . The existing single family residence is currently . connected to a septic system. The applicant is requesting that the converted office be allowed to remain connected until such time as further development, system failure or ten years, whichever occurs first. It is the City's policy that for commercial/office development, the site is required to connect to the public system occupancy F F stem rior to occu anc (if a public system is available) . This olicy is consistent P y co n with Unified Sewerage Agency regulations that require sewer connection for structures within 300 feet of a public line. Therefore, the applicant should be required to connect to the available public sanitary sewer system. ' • 3. STORM SEWER: R� There are l existing storm sewer lines available in SW Fir and SW 72nd Avenue. Again, o � both lines appear to be of adequate size and depth to , serve the site. The applicant or applicant's engineer should field verify this information prior to the start of any work. The applicant should be required to connect any onsite storm system to the public system. The.,I City of Tigard d B uilldin g Division has reviewed evs e wed ,„this p ro posal and has offered the following comments: •building • • ... ,� for changes to A � � n permit ws. ere required chair. 'e existing� g p ■ will � the � I Conform The building shall h�� required, to , standards forth, for a comet tang res�.de,nce. II to the commercial building. standard {dry not y�+y limited .. ... Y ,. • not be shall itedg to) : se ramps, s stairs,a.ncexits (but bathroom • • g subject ect • .. ,► g � to fire extinguishers, la�i facilities,�. p ,� e . impact and demonstration that the hu�,],d�:�a, is NOTICE I DECISION• � SDR 9l X00 15 GRECO SHCNI • • I I I . I s ViaLT II I I I structurally able to support the design loads for such office use. If the existing well is not to be used, it should be properly capped-off as required by the Washington County Watermaster. I I I I • a • The handicapped parking stall shall have a total width ith C of 16 feet (9 foot stall with 6 foot access aisle) . With the implementation of the American Disabilities Act (ADA) , it is suggested that the applicant give consideration to providing accessibility into the building, and the use of the toilet facilities. It may be required as part of the ADA. Tualatin Valley Fire and Roa scue District has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: Fire hydrants are required within 250 feet of all portions of the structure measured around the outside and along access roadways. Location approval will be coordinated with Tualatin Valley Water District. General Telephone has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: The developer should contact GTE Engineering Office for requirements. Allow 45 days lead time from completion of GTE Engineering review to trench open dates Columbia Cable has reviewed this proposal and has offered i the following comments: , I I , Please contact Columbia Cable for pre-wire specifications. The City �of Tigard Operations Department, and Portland, General Electric have reviewed this proposal and have issued no comments or objections. No oth er comments have been received. C. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION I I I I Section � Community r o� u. nity Dere 10 m ea t Code od e ' CD, C c ontai ns the dimer s ion l requirements for the C-P zo ne The e subject property is 42 6 0 square feet which dread l excehthe 6,0 0 0 square f oot minim required. Additionally, the width far ex ee This Code 5e allows a Anal foot required minimum. lot dsl the 50 . also al 136 foot to qu ctbon iim�taM building height of 45 feet in this zone ti Thh e applicant states that the current I , N �IC E OF DECISION 91-0015 - GPICO SHo KWILE R PAGE 7 I I I • I I ' I I �, r I I I I IRS, m ' r I I • . .,., ,._,.,a.,.,..,..._,.._,..,.i,..__.«.,.ti....�.......,..._„M_....,...,.w,.,. ...kea..__..,:.,_....,;. ............._.,..,�_....... ,,.., ...._.,.....,ww,,.,..'.«_. ..,..,_,,..,_..«.w..,...,M....-,..,«..,..,..,,....,,,_,._ M.,........;.1.,x....,._..4. . ._..t., ..........,-.:,.a«...,;. ....._...w...w«,.... _, ' M1 r „ at height of the building (approximately 22 feet) will not be changed. The minimum landscaping requirement is 20 percent for this zone. Only a relatively small portion of this site is will be covered by impervious surfaces. The balance of the property is either already landscaped or covered by natural vegetation. The applicant proposes to add additional birch, cherry and plum trees around the perimeter of the site in addition to numerous shrubs. � g district regulations Section l8.6 .�.050 of the C-P zonin requires minimum setbacks for developed sites in this zone as follows: rear yard 20 feet where the C-P zone abuts a .1 residential l district side yard setback -- 20 feet where the 1 � district, y C-P zone abuts a residential district. The western tern) boundary of this site abuts an R-3.5 (Residential, 3.5 units per acre) zoning district and therefore shall be required to maintain a 20 foot rear yard setback. Additionally, the north side of this site abuts an R-25 (Residential, 25 units per acre) zoning district and therefore shall be required to maintain a 20 foot side yard setback. The submitted site plan shows setbacks of approximately 220 feet on the west side (rear yard) and approximately 78 feet on the north lot line (side yard) . Code Section 18132 .X34mj (Nonconforming Structures) states that a structure, or placement of a structure on the lot, may be determined` to be legally nonconforming if the structure was in existence at the effective date of either the adoption or amendment of this title. The last revision of this section of Title 18 (CDC) was February 27, 1989. Prom even a cursory site visit it is plainly evident that this garage has been in existence prior the 1989. Therefore, this garage is determined by staff to be legally I' nonconforming and thereby subject to the provisions !' governing such nonconforming structures as listed in Section 18.130c . This code section has been satisfied. Section___:11,116_,112g/g) (1) (Minimum Off Street. Parking Requirements' . Administrative and Professional Services) requires one p in g space for each 350 square feet gross floor sp ac e. Th e office building is proposed to be 1,360 square feet in area. An office building of this size would require the provision of a minimum of four (4) parking spaces. The site plan indicates that 5 parking spaces will be provided: Therefore the preliminary site plan meets the number of parking spaces required to satisfy the Code requirements. State of Oregon House usa ...,1 2084,p which became effe ctiu e September 1, 1990, requires one diSabled person parking spaces if 6 to 25 parking spaces are p rovided. The proposed plan parking space I ' NOTICE G� DECISION SIJN SDF 91-0015 � GFD CO/SHCNKWILE., R PAGE � iI I d 11, • : ,....w,. ...-....,,. a, ,...•...» .. ......._._..........:....a.....,...•..-..,;..t.,......,.,......... _,. ._.., ... ,_•..........,....__.,...._.,.......,....-.,.i......,,...;..>v.......„ac.-.,...awk.................e.,....., ..d,-,...a.,.....,.r.,--_...,.- ._W.»....»..,.. .u...»...r»....,t_,_.»».a .a-..--;...A,..•.._a..v:....... ..... ._.,. • • • p ,,• which is required. Therefore, this code requirement has been satisfied. Code Section 18. 106 020 (P) requires one bicycle parking space for each 15 vehicle parking spaces in any development. Since there are only 5 parking spaces to be provided on this site, one bicycle parking space is required. The site plan • does indicate that a bicycle parking rack is to be provided on this site. Therefore, this code requirement has been met. The applicant proposes to cover the parking lot with gravel " eriod of time until the property is fully . , . for a tempa�rax'y p p p Y • developed in five to ten years. " Code Section 18.106.05011A • states: Except for . . temporary uses as authorized by subsection 3 below, all areas used for the parking or storage or maneuvering of any vehicle, boat or trailer shall be improved with asphalt or concrete surfaces , according to the same standards required for the City nce streets. acceptance of ��.t t. ' construction and p a The above referenced Subsection 3 refers to temporary uses as defined Section 18. 140 (Temporary Uses) . An approved Temporary Use Permit must be applied for and obtained in order to utilize this code exception. Additionally, temporary uses are valid for only 12 months. The proposed use on this site is not a Temporary Use and does not qualify to utilize this exception. Therefore, the parking area on the subject site shall be paved according to City standards. The site meets the minimum access standards through the provision of one 24 foot wide access driveway from SW Fir Street. Code Section :18 108 080 _ requires that a commercial development with a parking area providing between 0 and 99 parking spaces be provided with an access drive • with a minimum access wi"dth. of 30 feet. The accessway must • be paved to a minimum width of 24 feet. The applicant is proposing ing a paved 2 4 foot wad paved accessway and therefore satisfies this access requirement. Code Section 18. 108.050(A) re wires that within all commercial developments, walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrance. to streetswhich p�ovade the required acces s and egress,.. T he proposed ed s a to plan a. n indicates th at pedestrian acc ess to the main entrance of t he proposed office will be provided by a sidewalk eading to the SW 72nd Avenue f-�ontage Although vehicular traffic will access the ` site from SW Fir Street, the main pedestrian •. access point will be from SW 72nd Avenue. The parking area connected to th building by a porch and is co the office hu n -, - E HONKWILt PACE 9 NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 91��01 5 ��. CCU%� • ,•r _.-.4a.:.«......,..,_r,.M_.», ao-..._. ......._....w.u....,,,.,-..u. _, .:.a..a..... yw.,. -.-U,-,._ti...,.,d...,. ,,,....... .,_.4 .r„_..r..,- a.,.«,. .oat,._, x ..-- . .ti..._..,,.L...._.,«..M...a....... ....-.»,-':.I,.t».i-..,,.. ..«. «.L.--,::,r;......._..r<:.,iwu-„..:»:.:..w..+ad-.!»...,L::.,t n` . handicapped access ramp. Therefore, this code requirement has been satisfied Section 18.1021 (Visual Clearance Areas) requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a p rivate driveway. A f.. clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding 3 feet in height, except that obstructions which W may be located in this area shall be visually clear between 3 and 8 feet in height. Visual clearance areas shall be that triangular area formed by measuring a 30 foot distance along each of the right-of-way or property lines and then connecting these two 30, foot distance points with a straight 3 line. The proposed development conforms with all visual clearance requirements of this code section. In addition, the applicant has taken vision clearance into account in the submitted landscaping plan. contains standards for Chapter 1�. 1�0 requires a permit and chap qu p or more in diameter removal of trees having a trunk 6 inches � four feet above the ground on undeveloped land. A permit for tree removal must comply with the following criteria: a, The trees are diseased, present a �?a.nger to property, or interfere with utility 'service or traffic safety; • b. The trees have to be removed to construct • proposed improvements or to otherwise utilize the applicant's property in a reasonable manner; c. The trees to prevent , ..es are not needed o revert erosion instability, or drainage problems; d. The trees are not needed to protect nearby trees et as windbreaks or as a desirable balance between �. shade and pens space; •. nd o p :► e W The aesthetic character in the area not be visually adverse ly affected by t he tr ee removal; f. New vegetation planted by the applicant, if any, will replace the aesthetic va lue of trees to be cut. preliminary s to plan does not indicate that ryan � ! The ' � p �' has stated that the existing perimeter trees which abut trees will need to be removed. , the applicant is ant .. to be ”counted toward existing the adjacent streets are intended the minimum street t t ree requirement. If it seems to NOTICE OF DECISION S„DF 91.-0015 GlCO/SHONKWYIER PAGE 10 � 4 J I " 1 �. .,,.... . ... , ........-..... .»•_...,i,,..,.......0..,,+._. .....................`-,._ _„ _ . .. ......,,,.,.,...,._.........,._,i„„i_w,a.-w-_..».-..u,...,_,., .,.,-...,. ,.-..w»..s n.,....•...r"r,....., _.._..-,..-.,......,_w,__u.._..—.,.-,hw.»......_..,.....cw,....',...:.wt.,., .+.,. w..J..... ;..:i+i,-,..._.._ become necessary to remove a tree, no tree removal shall be allowed to occur prior to Planning Division staff review and approval of a tree removal permit. • Section 18. 100.035 (Street Trees) list the criteria for the maximum spacing of street trees along public nights--of-way,. The landscaping plan proposes to f , utilize those perimeter trees which currentl1' exist as part of the minimum street tree requirement. The a pp licant also proposes to plant additional street � . , r trees at thi s site. The street trees as shown on the landscaping plan surpass the requirements of this section. Therefore, this section has been satisfied. Section 18.114. 130W1 (Signs) list, the allowable signs and sign area for the C-P zone. The applicant proposes to locate one freestanding sign along SW 72nd Avenue approximately 60 feet from the corner of SW 72nd Avenue and SW Fir Street. The proposed sign will be less than eight feet in height and will not exceed 32 square feet per face. The proposed signage seems to fit within the allowable sign height, placement and area for this site. All signs shall be approved through the Sign 9 pP g g PermaL process as administered by the Planning Division. Additionally, the applicant requests to remain on the well water system which is provided on the site. No comments were received from Tualatin Valley Water District regarding this request. Therefore, the applicant shall contact the water district for further information regarding this request. • DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning . Director's, designee for the City of Tigard has APPROVED Site Development Review SDR 91-0015 subject to the conditions listed in Section 1. THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE FINAL DECISION DATE NOTED BELOW. D. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was published in t he newspaper, p osted at City Hall and mailed to The applicant and owners applicant record within required distance Owners of q } , The affected Ne ighborh ood Planning Or nizati n Affected government agencies , , • • 2. Final ion: Decis .• THE DECISION SHALL FINAL ON Z HE F UNLESS ,A APPEAL IS FILED. - N D, - /SHOaN `ILER E OF .� 1 - REDO o�'zC DECISION SDR 9 001.E � R PAGE 11 4 ri ..».+t•...M' ...-:-c `�r...m.,....o—R.«.J..,...«,..-•,lY.-...,.,..-a. .,...a .:...l:,;s'.....,,.•:,..xa.s.,::,,u.:—_-,...«Ii.w . ( 4, , ,--, s. '1/4, c_ , II w ... t i , 3. Appeal Any party to the decision may appeal this 1 decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and lj � " Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code '' which provides that a written appeal must be filed with l' the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. Appeal fee schedule and forms are available 1 at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 p.m. 4. Questions: If you have questions, please call City of ; Tigard Planning Department, City of. Tigard City Hall, , 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon. i PREPARED BY: Pon Pomeroy DATE I,' Assistant Planner t,'; APPROVED BY: Didk Bewersdorf DATE I u ' Senior Planner 1 y, rp\SDR91-15.DEC F r • II 1 II NOTICE Or DECISION - SHE. 91-0015 - GRECO/SHON WILER PAGE 12 . . A ... ' tT " I d �- d.:N..«x.,wa,,.+i' ._..A.,.:,...._......w.._...,L ;a.:.i..:�.'.'. _...._.,_.w ,.,_ '.; ....... '7m,,.ti'.; ,uu:..a.m.,:,..,..'A.............. .a..q_.,r-..;.......-..».i.::..4, w.,.,......,'...w,::..;.;:r: Ui,,.......' ..,.._.:.,i.,,..:..::... ...r:.....,1w...>a:.a»..M,.:i ....,....,....,.+.a::.....«,'...W.,..:»:..:,....«..K;u+;,..,..l:l., ;-,.u',u , /, CITY c F TIGARD OREGON { December 13, 1991 Mr. John Shonkwiler 5750 SW Carman Drive Lake Oswego, OR 97035 Dear Mr* Shonkwiler; I am writing in response to your 'request to receive a building permit for internal modifications and for modifications to external ..— porches for the property commonly known as 13425 SW 72nd Avenue P"o P P �' h .f (WCTM 2S1 1DC, tax lot 100) . You may apply to the Building Division for the above mentioned permits at your convenience. Please note that the granting of such permits, along with the personal financial investment which may. be necessary complete 1 to com _ P the desired construction or internal modifications, shall not be used as a basis, or as any instrumental part, of an appeal argument. The investment which you make in this property while Site Development Review SDR 91-0015 is in the appeal process is a decision which is based entirely upon your discression. Building r, permit issued during this appeal process shall not be interpreted as additional approval or endorsement by the City in favor of your appeal argument. t regarding Please obtaining of building ase contact M . Brad Roast in the Building Department the ok�t g g perrnits. if you have any questions reg a rdin g the appeal p cal pracess o please contact the Planning Department. nt, Sincerely, yr Pomeroy Ron oy Assistant Planner 13125 SW Hdll l��, �,Cti�;vi.2�3�?,Tp prd,Oregon ���23 (503)6�9-4'7 Ma u...,.„4..,,,..t.u.,...4— .Inb«Fr .....;.r.«„w. ..,-,w4..+.4 4„,,,,,4,--..w«.F•.d(,,-,.... ,..,...« S∎∎•in,, i.••.41,,,,..1,.u...1 M.•..:414M...e..:-.....—.L.,—,.,u1'A.',.,..i.l...«,..w,nsw4..,,,,.,,.4-4.-ti-.:r.-..,.y..rt,..4,.,.h.,4..4-a.,....4.n,...«....-4.r.-.r...-.....,,,.yv-+h4. .,1,«M+m� ,+.w'.".-,.,,,,',41,r.,...ua.n.L. u. • 4 4/ +r • mr;N + AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING r • I STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington City of Tigard . I, i°,-(11Ved..,A0/\--- , being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say: (Please print) " That I am a.Vim.- .� `-�- for ' The City of Tigard, Oregon, ' That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: „ --'*Tha,t I served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Planning Commission Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard. City Council I. of which is attached (Marked Decision) w of Deci � (Public Hearing Notice/Notice � . A csapy ( g ) Exhibit "A") was mailed to eadh named r s at th Iaddres shown o the attached list marked exhibit "B" on the 9 day of, \, 1b�� !�'��` 19`7f o ;'' 0 . •-. said notice NOTICE OF DECI_S. ON as here'o atta hedj_waa poste on an appropriate 1 bulletin board on the 2,222 '. . day of I) .�U , 19 l __,; and deposited + ' in the United States Mail on the '..r- AA day of -LL -/4A., Q ; 19 '7( , ! postage prepaid. • Preprarad Notice. Posted For Decision Onlv) 1 e * ) , ` 13q,4�' abed and sworn/affirm to me on °the ' day of c 'd. ,ReA G ir, r • ' . 1. r --NOTARY PUBLIC O. �M.,n ,k ,„, k , y` f `' ,1, n{t My Commission Expires: 4 ` `',” f,,,, � 3• ,Vt: y i ` A .7,1Atud9 tr"'ifr'l u J ,, i/ :...,..rte...-. /I ,r . Person wh• ivered to POST OFFICE Subs ribed' and sworn/affirm tO me on they day of ta .e ze it raw , 4 i `CT.I .Y PU.:L C OF OREGON': "r 4 l" ' 1 1 ■..1.1 ,40.2 " LAti..1'1 .-("11 i' r # My mission ESpires" ' d ' ' i p AFFIDAV.8KM H I • , r�; k! , ,2 . . _ i..ra....wM .,w, ,...w.s...... _....,,.:1,.._......, .,:.z.-µ...«,..,...,,_..,...»...u.,.......1..,._.. ...,..w,..............>r,..,......*,,.,.u;«._,n.r..bxwi.d-;w.,.,....,-.r.»,n.,,.,,,,.—,.. u....,_.J:ALl..,...L.:. ,aA.,--...ru.M.....:,.. ,...«.w ...M'.::+.'.,.n,,.:l...I.a;. rrJu_..:...,...;-.4.,,,..r.a,...u....:...a....,,..... M.,... CITY OF TIGARD • NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 91-0015 GRECO HONCW I Et OWNER/APPLICANT T APPLICATION: A request for Site Development Review approval to allow the conversion of a 1,360 square foot single family- residence into professional offices with related site improvements. Zoning: C-P (Commercial Professional) Location: 13425 SW 72nd Avenue . (WCTM 2S1 1DC, tax lot 100) . The C-P zoning designation allows p ublic agency enc x administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, real ' estate and „ busin e ss support services ce s amon g other uses. SECTION I - DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director's designee for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above . { request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section II: BUILDING PERMITS WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL THE CONDITIONS LISTED BELOW ARE SATISFIED. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, PLEASE CONTACT CHRIS N, THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AT 639-4171. DAVIES� r �l[E' E 1. An erosion control plan . shall be provided as p art of the improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Control Plans - Technical Guidance lianibook, November 1989. " 2. The applicant shall be required to connect the existing structure to the public sanitary sewer line 3. Storm drainage details shall be provided` as part of the public improvement plans. Calculations and a topographic supplement�` to the�public improvement �la be provided as a map of the storm drainage shall r plans. Calculations shall be based on the full development of the serviceable p area. The location and capacity of existing, proposed, and future lines shall be addressed. 4. Standard improvements,rovements, including concrete et e sidewalk, driveway apron, curb, as p haltic concrete pavement, sanitar y sewer, storm drainage, streetlights, and underground utilities shall be installed along SW Fir At Street. Improvements shall be designed and constructed t o Local street standards and ` shall conform n orm to the al i nment of existing adjacent improvements ants or an alignment approved by the En gineering Department. 5. Additional right-of-way dedicated to the Public along the� SW Fir� Street shall �� be de . Publ .gi a frontage � t f stage to increase the right-of- NOTICE CE CF DECISION � S�� 91 aOl 5 • GEEGO/S HCNKWxLE R PAGE 1 • , .: ._ .,J...,...an. .»..,. ...:....._,.,:.'..' ....«., _..n..,.... .w._..,.w. `."....J.v....,_.,..M... w,a...u«„+4:«..J.,a'.,«»iA-.w.,l..-. ,. „q,l,...,....,....— u,..................,_...b....w..,.,.„u,. ..,.r-.».a.4...,,-..,k._.,n...,..,.m,:1,...,.-,..k_.«i....an+l,..,i,t.,,Jr.. .,.w.,,.- ,..,i1.,...1J..-.4.ti,,...ILi..,w ...-. w_ ...+.4.;. ......,..m..w....,m,..,w, -,. , rw w a.•d... '4.L„ ,.-.—« + r i i Iii; way to 25 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of -way centerline. 6. The applicant shall install a sidewalk along the frontage of SW 72nd Avenue. " o - Public the Pub •• 7. Additional� right-of-way way s�iall be dedicated to th ,' .• along the SW 72nd Avenue frontage to increase the right--of way to 30 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline 8. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the S.W. 74th Avenue frontage to increase the right- of way to 25 feet from the centerline. The description / shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. 9. An agreement shall be executed by the applicant, on forms provided by the. City, which waives the property owner's right to oppose or remonstrate against a future Local . Improvement District formed to improve SW 74th Avenue. �° CONDITIONS LISTED WILL ISSUED UNTIL THE, CO OCCUPANCY PERMITS W"GL NOT BE IS�U BELOW ARE SATISFIED. 10 All landscape materials, site improvements and required public improvements shall installed as per approved • .�n t p pp site plan. STAFF CONTACT: Ron ''Pomeroy, Planning Division, 639-4171. 11. Fite Hydrants .are required within 250 feet, of all portions of the structure measured around the outside and along all access roadways. Location approval will be coordinated with Tigard Water District, STAFF CONTACT: Gene Birchell, Tualatin Valley Fire District, 526-2502 IN ADDITION, THE APPLICANT SHOULD AWARE THE FOLLOWING I .A,D ON� '� BE ' AWAR OF I • SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. PLEASE NOTE: THIS IS NOT AN EXHAUSTIVE LISP 1. SECTION 18. 120.060 - BONDING AND ASSURANCES A. all projects where public np. rovement� are required cured the Dir for shall: 1. Require a bond an amount not greater than 100 percent of other adequate assurances as a condition of. approval of the site development q p lan in order t o ensure the completed p rojeot is s in conformance with the approved plan; and Approve and release such bonds. 2. p ' • NOTICE OF DECISION - SDI 91-0015 - � GkE CO/SHONKWILER PACE 2 I a .. _c....,. .,,.r »,J:« w.._;.L•»_,. ,_,.yw....: .+:..-..:•r.a.iL ._.._..:,.,.. ...,....,,.1.,.-:.....rL'.J.«.._..,....«..i:...;wa..,,.....:.,w..,,.,_.,.-•r,w.•... _+, B. The bond shall be released when the Director finds the • completed project conforms to the approved site development plan and all conditions of a A P approval are satisfied. ' 2. SECTION 18. 1 6 4 STREET AN D UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS A. 18. 164 .030 Streets 1. Street Cross Sections: a. Surface material shall be of Class C or B • asphaltic concrete; b. The al i ' f n lift ''shall be placed o all ll new construction roadways prior to City final acceptance of the roadway; however, not ! before 90 percent of the structures in the new development are completed unless three hF years c � have elapsed since initiation of constru ction in the development. I y' c. The final lift shall be Class B asphaltic concrete as defined by A.P.W.A. standard specification „ • d. No lift shall be less than 1-1/2 inches in thickness. • B. 18. 164. 120 m Utilities di l i di All utility 1. ' nes including, but not t • �r b limited to, • those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface r . . mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities, during construction, and high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts . or above, C. 18. 164. 180 - to City y Required 1. Work shall not begin until t he City been notified in a dvanc e. ,., 2. If work is discontinued for any y it shall reason,r not be resumed until the City is notified. , r . 3. A tree rem ova l permit shall be obtained from the Planning a n Department prior to of any o n th e Sit e e • T le 1 E � -.0 NOTICE �.L: DECISION 7, 1� 0 , 15 �- c���co���c�r��arLER PAGE 0 n , . N,.,.._.._..w,w,.. ..Mna...a..•a.✓.. _._. a J..-..4 w n. Aw. w• ,,..♦. ,.a,..,.--- .1 'I ..._r u w J H:IU« .. dw • C1 which is greater than 6 inches in diameter when measured at 1 four feet from grade. STAFF CONTACT: Victor Adonri, Planning Department, 639-4171. 4 . Sig n permits are required prior to the installation of an y sign of the site. Sign permits may be obtained through the Planning Department. STAFF CONTACT; Victor Adonri, Planning Department, 639-4171. SECTION II .. FINDINGS OF FACT. I i 1. Vicinity Information The subject parcel is located on the southwest quadrant of ( ' . the intersection of SW 72nd Avenue and SW Fir Street. Southwest 74th Avenue abuts this site on its' western edge. , This site is bordered on the east and south by properties I which are zoned C-P (Commercial Professional) . The property to the, north is zoned R-25 (Residential, 25 units per acre) . The property to the west is zoned R-4.5 (Residential, 4.5 h' units per acre) and is developed with the 2. I Site Information and Proposal Description I I I 4 As stated by the applicant, the subject property is currently improved by a single family residence which is approximately 1360 square feet in size) , a 352 square foot detached garage, an 80 r•quare foot tool shed and a 143 ,'. square foot will house. The residence is currently served by a septic tank-drain field, and as domestic water well. • There are a variety of deciduous and evergreen trees located d around the perimeter he property is .i. tl from SW 72nd Avenue near Loop currently the corner of SW Fir Loo and SW 72nd Avenue. The applicant requests Site Development Review approval to allow the conversion of a 1,360 square foot single family residence into professional offices. This development is proposing to provide parking in the northeastern portion of I the a t ite 3. Agency and NPO Comments • The Engineering Division has reviewed the request and 1 provides the, following comments: ,I 1. STREETS: The site is located on the southwest corner {` � oc t of SW 72nd ,. .. it is i The site is unique in that fronted o n th:�eesides with public roads; on the and Fir Street, east by SW Avenue, the north by SW Fir street, 1 Wiest I,b S�' 7 on th and on the 72nd uel4th Avenue 72 NOTICE OF DECISION DR 1- I� S 9 0015. GRFCO/SHONKW7CLFR PAGE 4 I I f ' ... .... w._ ,'.._L a,.w-.«u......a...,....._.„.M«.,.._ ........., ..,. ... .... ...,....,.,...m.a.,._a4a»t_:a.,.F...4.... 4 H.,..M...d.,....... ...:.„—.,.,,»«.,...,.,s,.. ...,....i..-.._...«....., ra...«...,.«,«w ,t • a Southwest 72nd Avenue is classified as a major collector and carries the following standards; 60 feet of right-of-way and 44 feet of pavement. Currently the portion of SW 72nd Avenue which is adjacent to the site • is fully improved except for sidewalks. The right-of- way in front of the site varies from 21 to 25 feet from centerline. There is an access driveway from 72nd into the site. Chapter 10_1000.060 of the Community Development Code, limits direct individual access to arterial and collector streets. Since the site has access to local streets (Fir and 74th Avenue) the . access s po int from SW 72nd Avenue should be abandoned. The applicant has shown on the preliminary plan that the access to the site will be from SW Fir Street and that the access to SW 72nd Avenue will be closed. Therefore, the applicant should be required to do the following: A. Dedicated additional right-of-way to 30 feet from centerline along SW 72nd Avenue frontage; B. Install a sidewalk along the frontage of SW 72nd (' Avenue; and C. Abandon the access point along SW 72nd Avenue. Southwest Fir Street is classified as a local street with the following standards; 50 feet of right-of-way and 34 feet of pavement. Currently the portion of SW ! . Fir Street which is adjacent to the site is fully improved on the north side, including sidewLlks. On the south side of Fir Street the pavement width varies. There is an extruded curb and 20 feet of right-of-way. Therefore, the applicant should be required to do the following A. Dedicate right-of-way of y to 25 feet ate additional wa from centerline along the SW Fir Street Frontage, and • B. Provide half-street improvements along 1.11e frontage of SW Fir Street. S�uthw venue is also classified as a local , es��i 74th Avenue als Street y Currently SW 74th has no improvements along g this ' ' the Director of thz�, site. ' ,The DevPlo me' the frontage o to � accept a "non-remonstrance" nt Code allows improvements if the site e meets certain criteria, far ter�.�. as specified in Section ,8. 164.030` This site ite meets the following criteria under Section 10. 164 .030: Additional o �al P lann in g g w ork is required to define ,the desi gn standards fpr the street, . ' NOTICE SIGN S 91-0015 GRJ ONXWILER PAGE 5 OF DECISION SDR 9�.. --' gg a � and the application is for a project which would contribute only a minor portion of the anticipated future traffic on the street. Therefor , the applicant should be required to do the following: A. Sign a non-remonstrance agreement for the feature improvements along SW.74th Avenue, and B. Dedicate additional right-of-way to 25 feet from centerline along the SW 74th Avenue frontage. 2 . SANITARY SEWER: There are two existing public sanitary sewer lines that abut this property; an 8 inch line in SW Fir Street and an 8 inch line in SW 72nd Avenue. Based on the "as-builts" , both lines appear to be of adequate size and depth to serve the site; the applicant or applicant's engineer should field verify this information prior to the start of, any work. The existing single family residence is currently connected to a septic system. The applicant is requesting that the converted office be allowed to remain connected until such time as further development, system failure or ten years, whichever occurs first. It is the City's policy that for commercial/office development, the site is required to ji connect to the public system prior to occupancy (if a public system is available) .'' This, policy is consistent with Unified Sewerage Agency regulations that require Y iwithin o f a re within 300 feet sewer connection � for structu s public line. Therefore, the applicant should be required to connect to the available public sanitary Sewer system. 3. STORM SEWER: There are existing public storm sewer lines W �F`' ` � it and �SW �7`���.d �AVenu� depth�to available S e. Again, both appear to be adequate size and d pp n serve the site. T lines ar a of a. a ua p • �The applicant or applicant's engineer should field verify this information prior to the start of any work. The applicant should be- ,.. e qu" red to connect any onsite storm system to t he public system. • The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: A g7g p° will ere gu�r changes to the existing residence �The building shall be requited to • conform standards set f ial to These t;and, t :forth for a commercial , r tv the s ding. standards shall include (but not be building. �s� NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 91-0015 - GRECO/SHONKWILER • t , 1 �,.. • CSL limited to) : ramps, stairs, exits, bathroom p' facilities, fire extinguishers, glazing subject to impact and demonstration that the building is structurally able to support the design loads for such office use. If the existing well is not to be used, it should be properly capped-off as required by the Washington County Watermaster. A The handi.c.apped parking stall shall have a total width of 16 feet (9 foot stall with 6 foot access aisle) With the implementation of the American .Disabilities Act (ADA) , it is suggested that the applicant give consideration to providing accessibility into the building, and the use of the toilet .facilities. It may be required as part of the A.DA:. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: ' Fire hydrants are required within 250 feet of, all j a portions of the structure measured around the outside ,`' and along access roadways. Location approval will be . coordinated with Tualatin Valley Water District. General Telephone p ne has' reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: The developer should contact GTE Engineering Office for requirements. Allow 45 days lead time from completion of GTE Engineering review to trench open .date. .• Columbia Cable has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: Please contact Columbia Cable for pre-wire specifications. r , The City of Tigard O p erations De pa rtment, a_ n n d Portland • General Electric have reviewed this proposal and have issued no comments or objections No other comments have been received: C. ANAL S I S AND CONCLUSION Section 18.64 of the Community .. ity Develop ment Code od e (CDC)Contains the dimensional requirements for the C-P zone. The . subject prop er ty is 42,160 s qu are feet 'which exceeds the 6,000 square foot mirtimum required. Additionally, �� �»�.� DECISION NOTICE OF SDR 1 0015 GRECO/SHOI ER PAGE 7 m 136 foot lot width far exceeds the 50 foot required minimum. This code section also allows a maximum building height of 45 feet in this zone. The applicant states that the current height of the building (approximately 22 feet) will not be changed. The minimum landscaping requirement is 20 percent for this zone. Only a relatively small poa'tion of this site is will be covered by impervious surfaces The balance of the property is either already landscaped or covered by natural vegetation. The applicant proposes to add additional birch, cherry and plum trees around the perimeter of the site in addition to numerous shrubs. Section 18.64.05Q of the C-P zoning district regulations requires minimum setbacks for uses developed sites in this zone as follows: rear.. yard - 20 feet where the C-P zone abuts a residential district, side yard setback - 20 feet where the C-P zone abuts a residential district. The western boundary of this site abuts an R-3.5 (Residential, 3.5 units per acre) zoning district and therefore shall be required to maintain a 20 foot rear yard setback. Additionally, the north side of this site abuts an R-25 (Residential, 25 units per acre) zoning district and, therefore shall be required to maintaie a 20 foot side yard setback. Thc submitted site plan shows setbacks of approximately 220 feet on the west side (rear yard) and approximately 18 feet on the north lot live (side yard) . Code section 18. 32 a 0m1 l (Nonconforming Structures) states that a structure, or placement of a structure on the lot, may be determined to be legally nonconforming if the , structure was in existence at the effective date of either the adoption or amendment of this title. The last revision of this section of Title 18 (CDC) was February 27, 1989 . From even a cursory site visit it is plainly evident that this garage has been in existence prior the 1989. Therefore, this garage is determined by staff to be legally nonconforming and thereby, subject to the provisions governing such nonconforming structures as listed in Section 18.132.040 C . This code section has been satisfied. Section 18.106 .030 C) (il (Minimum Off-Street Parking Requirements - Administrative and Professional Services) requires one parking space for each 350 square feet of gross •�' I : loor sp ce. The, office ffice building a s ro pose» d to be 1,360 Square et in area. An building of this size would require provision of a minimum of four (4) parki ng spaces. The Site indicates that parking spaces wil l be provided. Therefore erel imina rY� sxte plan meets the number of parking spaceS required red to satisfy the Code requirements. NOTICE OF DECISION - SCR ' 91-0015 - GRECO/S '�I C HONIfW1LEP. PAGE 8 • o ........,i. .:...... r , n .. ....._i,_. ,.i .-. ,..,.,,,,,, - ....., .._,...:,..,. ...................,...,.._...... »,....._»......,_..r.,.«.,m,.._,..,..+.r.+.-..,rw.,...,u...,..4..................u,c.....,.4....._r.,.....»_.r..._..,..w..... ...r,....4..,.....vr...r.:rt..i-..d w. ..1..,,-, .», .....w.r • • State of Oregon House Bill 2084, which became effective e September 1, 1990, requires one disabled person parking spaces if 6 to 25 parking spaces are provided.' The proposed plan provides for the one disabled person parking space which is required. Therefore, this code requirement has been satisfied. Code Section 18. 106 .02 - requires onn bicycle parking space for each 15 vehicle parking spaces in any development. Since there are only 5 perking spaces to be provided on this site, one bicycle parking space is required. The site plan does indicate that a bicycle parking rack is to be provided ' on this site. Therefore, this code requirement has been met. The applicant proposes to cover the parking lot with gravel for a "temporary period of time until the, property is fully developed in five to ten years Code Section 18.106.050�(T states: Except for . . . temporary uses ^'m authorized by subsection 3 below, all areas used for the parking or storage or maneuvering of any vehicle, boat or trailer shall be improved with asphalt or concrete surfaces according to the same standards required for the construction and acceptance of City streets. . The above referenced Subsection 3 refers to temporary uses as defined Section 18. 140 (Temporary Uses) . An approved Temporary Use Permit must be applied for and obtained in order to utilize this code exception. Additionally, temporary, uses are valid for only 12 months. The proposed, use on this site is not a Temporary Use and does not qualify to utilize this exception. Therefore, the parking area on the subject site shall be paved according to City standards. h the The site meets the minimum access standards through provision one 24 foot wide access driveway from i not r o�nSW �' r Street. Code Section 18. 108.080 ,0: requires that a commercial development with a parking area providing between 0 and 99 parking spaces be provided with an 'access drive ti be paved to M h of f set. The applicant must with a minimum access wide feet. The accessway a minimum width of is proposing a a paved xed �4 foot wide paved acde s swa y and therefore satisfies this access requirement. Code Section 18. 108 .050(.114. requires that within al l commerc'iai' developments, d ev el p nt~, walkways ys steal ] ,emote nd from the ground floor entrances to the streets which provide the required access and e g ress. The p roposed site plan indicate s pedestrian destraan access to the main entrance of the p ro posed office w ill be provided by a s idewalk leading to NOTICE 0 E DECISION SDR 91 -0 015 - GRECO/SHON tw1LE t PAGE 9 ..,_...•..... •,...,. .. . ... .......,...,....,....-.._-,...,,.._ ._ ,.._,_.. ..,, ,..»-w..u...>...1.....i-». _.t.......a�...._w».a.....,..._+....,..�..=a.:.µ'r«.. .»:;....w,:F..,..ia1-»....,,aw...,., .-« ...,.i.w . -.�.'u:.......:x;a.«.H.:...,a..+,.:L,w.c.;._..«.-..a.w-......:._....:_..:::,...,..-M .f:•+........-. t the SW 72nd Avenue .fronts g e Although vehicular traffic g will access the site from SW Fir Street, the main pedestrian access point will be from SW 72nd Avenue. The parking area is connected to the office building by a porch and . • handicapped access ramp. Therefore, this code requirement has been satisfied. Section 18. 102 (Visual Clearance Areas) requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all adjacent to intersecting right-.of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain ne vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding 3 feet in height, except that obstructions which may be located in this area shall be visually clear between 3 and 8 feet in height. Visual clearance areas shall be that triangular area formed by measuring a 30 foot distance along each of the right-of-way or property lines and then connecting these two 30 foot distance points with a straight line. The proposed development conforms with all visual clearance requirements of this code section. In addition, 4 the applicant has taken vision clearance into account in the submitted landscaping plan. Chapter 18. 150 requires a permit and contains standards for removal of trees having a trunk 6 inches or more in diameter four feet above the ground on undeveloped land. A permit for tree removal must comply with the following criteria: a. The trees are, diseased, present a danger� '� ne d�.sea� ,�� p end. r to property, or interfere with utility sorvice or traffic safety; b. The, trees have to be , removed to construct proposed improvements or to otherwise utilize the applicant s property in a reasonable manner; c. The trees are tot needed to prevent erosion, instability, or drainage problems; • • The trees es ar.. not .' protect• d. e not� needed to � rotect� trees as windbreaks or as a desirable balance between shade and open space; The aesthetic c • ter in the area will not be ally adversely.. ellr�affected by the tree removal; e visually . .._E. Nev vegetation planted b the applicant,.. if any, will re 1ace�p� the aesthetic value of trees to be cut. NOTICE OP DECISION - SbR 91-0015 - GRECO/SHONKW1hER PAGE 10 ,._.-. .. .__ ._.. _..,,... _..,,_.....T,. , .-,. .,s..,-,._.. ...a..,i..,...M.,...__.,...._....._....._,,..,._..,_.-_J,. ...,._....,,.... ._•..._...w... .__ .-.....:1..«'.� ......,.+........, n....a..-u».aaw»,..,,,..r.,........rr...._...:........F;.w...r 7 Th e preliminary� si site plan does not indicate cats that an y trees will need to be removed. Rather, the applicant has stated that the existing perimeter trees which abut the adjacent streets are intended to be counted toward the minimum street tree requirement. If it seems to become necessary to remove a tree, no tree removal shall be allowed to occur prior to Planning Division staff review and approval of a tree removal permit. Section 18.. 100.035 (Street Trees) list the criteria for the maximum spacing of street trees along public rights-of-way. The landscaping plan proposes to utilize those perimeter trees which currently exist as part of the minimum street tree requirement. The applicant also proposes to plant additional street • trees at this site. The street trees as shown on the landscaping plan surpass the requirements of this code section. Therefore, this section has been satisfied. " Section 18. 114. 130(121 (Signs) list the allowable signs and sign area for the C-P zone. The applicant proposes to locate one freestanding sign along SW 72nd Avenue approximately 60 feet from the corner of SW 72nd Avenue w and SW Fir Street. The proposed sign will be less than • eight feet in height and will not exceed 32 square feet per face. The proposed signage seems to fit within the allowable sign height, placement and area for this site. All signs shall be approved through the Sign Permit administered' • . ; " ' + process � as ' adm" by the Planning I i Division. DECISION: Notice is hereby given, that the Planning Director's " desi nee for the City of Tigard has APPROVED Site Development Review SDR 91-0015 subject to the conditions listed in Section I. • THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCI SED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE . FINAL DECISION DATE NOTED $ELOW. D. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: _ , ,The applicant and owners ..._ _O record within the required distance Owners of within required I i� • �. The affeo to c Neighborhood Planning g Organizatlon —ZAffected government agenci es 2 . Final Decisiono THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL r -11 UNLESS' IAN APPEAL IS FILE D b � I I { , I I I SI SDR,off DECISION 9l: 5 r ARE -001 � . NOTICE T9E� - �, �a/SOON ILER PAGE 11 , I , a r• y. •• ... _.+, t:, __+..+,.,..k..wi 4-+,....,;..';,-.,1.......,,..w.,..+wl-+�r.:n..,.4».+.,I.,...+;�.,.r-.�n.,w:,....d' ..»,Hl,",4...r�....,a_..wv.+..«_...uM:q�4.m %,' ......,...:.»w.1..4-..:..,.:1::....,..W.-.u......,....,.w..-..�.. ..,r_....,«....,..+.r„a w,.....,.;�...,. .,«:i'.,.::F=..-x..;4...+.+....'....--.+..,.....Nir.:r:..,'.,,.., a-»:.. 3. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. Appeal fee schedule and forms are available at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, . Oregon. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 p.m. I21/-671 4. , uestons: If you have questions, please call City of Tigard Planning Department, City of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon. PREPARED BY: Ron Pomeroy DATE Assistant Planner ,. / APPROVED BY: Dick Bewersdar f DATE Senior Dianne rp\SD 91--15.DEC • . - SDR 91-00 NOTICE Or 'DECISION� 15 - GRECO/5HONrLER PAGE 12 • , • ti. ___ -N\N-N...., N 1N \_\ _ m i kg i fp Nii G The Cif of A , _ . : _ ! _ - . _ . " " _ i i K D . , _ _ _ i.: _ s i,. _ __ _ _ _ \ 1 . , _ L _ __ .__ _ ,: _ , _ ,..• _ ___ _ „. _ _ „ _ _ Mit- __ _ --- -_ __ ____ _ 1,_ __-_ ' - - Inlin 4„,„ 1-\\ . SDR 91 - 0015 r ciliff - :1_,__ t, _ t 1. _._ . •• ., ., • X11 Site Area — : _ _ -.,_ = f____1 - -k \ . - 1 _______ E ji . , . • . . ::,‘\N, 4 —1--- - __ ) i I C7 - y - - [\.\\ - - AND..'RG - - - - - - - - _ -_ --- -- - - - _ _ -- a- t' _. , , ,.._ Lil________L_ Oiyilol deia k ra p re re:ca— I et4,..k as t!e City t ttic k t-. - t Iilard ntiiizie -ate9ra- _ of !A-tarmetio System CtS} :ditto-rt. !blot- - met i i d l '� ('�` — ma ;es par rtJe etc � - - - - -" -- - - - :44.j/'' flit ie IA icAdtd to it - - - - -- aacd xliD da:itioaat • !ct6alcal led/or -_ 4 H ini.etttcitiiY-s dote \\\:,,,,\_ . _ _ -- 'G { _ st delerai.ASd ip 111166. S'(/ Ciiy of Tigard. tkt ," E ga tab T:11/121/511) . . a .v r • Y4 rvJk_..s4.-+...,J J..,,..T..,......,r-, t.-r e rrw--�...,.h .a........,..r._-...,r., r .. _. ....... Y.Ja....rrr -..J:,. 'wl..r.......w...nr-.ra -..Y:+Ma.u,.,.,19sr-...al.nnr«WiL+-+.w.. ..I.eN,......_r 3' ei..L.. "...w,.rr'.+a.r.».r-.a k�.,.U:.J _.....+,..:.H-.-,..:W,:F's.,.W.' ..Mr..,..E.au.r a..,rF. ..r.a 1+ / .., p° LOS A.NC�;LES CA 90025 , ' ' 02'107' SW GREENWOOD RD, ' ' PORTLAND. OR..,;.:.• 7219. ,. 2SIO1DC.-OO100 . ' ' t, 2S101DC-003O(' • ' , GRECO, GUS LORAINE GRASCO INVESTMENTS ' , ' : 13425 SW' 72ND AVE 10300 CENTURY OAK DR TIGARD OR 97223 ' ' TIGARD OR 97223 f.P``' 2S101DC-00400 •••'s•••••r .•••••••.•• I 2S101DC-03 iU • ' MAKSYI4, ANTHONY J. ' EMS,, RAYMOND B PHYLLIS ,GI ' 13565 SW 72ND AVE I iI 13400 SW 76TH .' "' . ' 'TIGARD OR 97223. PORTLAND OR 97223' , I . 2S101DC--03302 . ,.,. 2S101bC-0340 OTTO', WALTER L GRASCO INVESTMENTS . ' C' . TJO}RiE MAY H � " . 10300 SW CENTURY OAK DR ' ., ' • , 7435 SW CHERRY TIGARD OR 97223 , - TIGARD OR 97223 H '!A ' 2S1OIDC-03500 2S101DC-x•03501 Y••••Q•••O••••.,1.•••. ' ' ' ' SMITH, MARVIN V' EILEEN K l;TO i, 'RONALD M RUTH E . ' . ' 13415 SW 72ND' 13395' SW 72ND AVE ' TIGARD OR 97223 ` TIGARD ' , OR 97223 I ' 1.C? w � 51011�C 03{700 wY•4 ♦ 2S1DC� 035®2 2 . ' WALKER,I 'JAMES CALVIN JANUARY LEASING COMPANY ' ,, ) 13405 SW ,"14TH. I „ 6645 NORTH ENSIGN TIGARD OR ' 97223 ATTN: A A POMPEL, JR ' 217 PORTLAND OR 97217 r 2 S 10 y Y 4—©3 1 / • M••M•Y•Y M O.f iY•1-•r• . , 2S101DC-03703 • •a,♦•...Y»4 w a r..•• • i' i CCI REAL ESTATE EQUITY DUBALd ROBERT R AND 1 FUND, INC " ' I . Y3ECK, TOM L ',1,..,:.. .— BY CAPITAL CONSULTANTS, INC ' 13500 SSW 72ND I ' • ` 2300 SW FIRST AVE :, I VE I ' ' ' 'I' PORTLAND � OR 97223 r PORTLAND OR 97201 2S101DC- 04200 •..............a 25101DC--04201 . ., a ROBINSONr, E LEE'' ACME ASSOCIATES, LTD 15304 NW WEST ONION A ''' ATTR MICHAEL PALMER 1990 S SUNDY DR PORTLAND. OR 3739 SUITE 600 LOS ANGELES CA 90025 ' I a o .1. r ^ 009'... 25101D(-04300 b i..•.r .•'a. ......• .... 1 2S1O1DA■^0i200 a..a...•«.i a L)n.w u• ,r 1' AORTLANDCIANS LTD ROBINSON,I�TS ►N, EST UNION N RD ' ' .L PALMER ' 97229 �,� ' ' PORTLAND OR � : � ' I ' ' ' ' r �' � � � � x.990 S. FlUtdlS� DR SUITE 600 LOS ANC3ELES HCA, 90025 I, r .. .. 2S 1DS-00601 • r 2S1 �D, � .�Wa.a LARRY... Y rr TGEkI.'' DAVID. LT�C d'•a. .. 'w e�a'a i7.�;L1B-�006�.7 �+ � a�• AND: � r ETr '�STHA �' 133 60 SW STEWART; +lAALENE 'N /AS TRUE ' TIGARD OR 97223 I TEES ' P .2 o 8Ox 7 ' I S ERWOOD OR ' 51140 ,r I I ' �', • ''',r 11 JOHN W. SHONKWILER 1� 5750 SW CARMAN DR f LAKE OSWEGO OR 97035 I' . GUS & LORAINE GRECC� ' ' 13425 SW 72ND 31,1TF� TIGARD OR 9722:', .. '„ • CRAIG HOPKINS s,•.. ' 7430SW YARNS T 97223 1 G OR \��y7 V , { It r • • • 1 • I II i ' • t6 i �I (lr I if • ,i • , 1'1,1', Y +i 1x;Aril tii.y }tY 1 ��r r�'y bi:) AD or :1,..i:,-: i + .�� " ti : 1 1 2% as' : " I"N :1.r. �5.t�, ��� �.�u" "fV: a GA � Y� ( t.S.4.4 a :+ .. I I I I r uQt eeqq N Y '1. ", i,d d r ,tr r • "x :avid:', k l "a �j °•1 i''t1.L1�� 'is' w M Y A � Y r �/L� • { /V o-. Y 1, i F+1 T ' � � � � • "y',Y t•'it7 A"11i1i�'7$t'T"i6'�I i'Yd"?+I'"1 �� • A . Y - ...: ,,,. z.. „ ,.. .,.. . 1..,»'..wr Y..«..-»..J:.,.+,^.h,..F+a.....,.�.,r...✓-..i.Wru., '.1.:,Sr M:+l...w,m.^J te;:,,w,_..:.AJ..,_..:ilra..«}L.hrl,+.-..M..., ! *NigAillilli rill iti ' . ''' .. I■AL4...A...L.it'...IL CITY OF TIGARDY , .- OREGON I November 12, 1991 John W. Shonkwiler 5750 SW Carman Drive l Lake Oswego, OR , 703 RE: Traffic Impact 'fee for conversion of the residence at 13425 SW 72nd Avenue to an office 0 • Dear Mr. Shonkwiler- • Enclosed with this letter you will find a calculation sheet showing' the calcnlatitan that has been performed to determine the amount of the Traffic Impact Fee (TIP) to be paid for the project noted above. The calculated amount of the TIF is $1399.00. it ';l Tease note that you may appeal the discretionary decisions made in determining � n ' .. the appropriate category and the amount of the fee based on that category. A 0 notice of appeal must be received by City of Tigard Recorder no later than 3:30 • p.m, on November 26, 1991. An appeal would be heard by the Washington County 1 Hearings Officer. Please note that this calculation does not constitute an implied or explicit 4; ,• approval of SDR91-00:15. If S&R91--00J 5' is not approved and the house is not converted to Office use, the calculated TIF is void. If you have any questions, or if 1 can be of further service, please contact me at 639-4171 ext. 390. Sincerel Y Vi Goodwin Permits Coordinator h IV il f i1 .,..........______] ,,,, 4 Blvd,,RO,Box 23397,tigard,Oregon 9722 )639-4171 , n . x n� . . o r �,., r! n fill'^ • • ti DATE: PLANS CHECK NO.: C ll- z, -9, //n(4. PROJECT TITLE: COUNTYWIDE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE APPLICANT: WORKSHEET av MAILING ADDRESS: . (FOR NON-SINGLE FAMILY USES) .. CI /ZIP/PHONE: RATE PER 7'5 r TRIP TAX MAP NO., L RESIDENTIAL Z / ;be "fit/ RU OIIESS AND COMMERCIAL $35.00 SITUS NO.ADDRESS: • ° ..` INDUSTRIAL INSTITUTIONAL $57.00 PAYMENT METHOD: ' ° IN CA H CHECK aCREDIT INSTITUTIONAL ONLY: im BANCROFT PROMISSORY NOTE LAND USE CATEGORY DESCRIPTION OF USE EEKDAY AVG. '[`HIP NATO WEEKEND AVE TRIP RAT S •"� DEFER TO OCCUPANCY O F. ` ''/ 16 3 / BASIS: 6/+I4/vets el 5e e9/11 P6. /05E-4..)rh4e._ re e z w` ., .:r+.a �, sQe-oofv6-_ ,19prAr-Ais7 • izgeted CALCULATIONS: l_ 1 �y /l s — ;t o d'� ► /M OO J ` /_°D 9 ` ' , PROJECT TRIP,GENE:RATO �".............. .,.�- r�' - ..., E FEE / 9 9 ..A .., li'�, AD1.)11 ZONAL NOTES: FOP ACCOUNTING PURPOSES ONLY: xoiee iftilet7,1 oo PREPARED Et?" t, r4 CC: WAsHt4 GTb COUNTY . +t NO EDCO1 j i form tiff i , •i..- -- ., ......,.w.+r.. ., �.,.i:.-..J r,.r...a.._.....,,.•,.......,.. u..«. .l.-_,.aJ+...,.0 s .[.r....,J.i...»...IN-.,,.4.............•........,....Mih.A..,l......JA..,v....u.+.`+J.w,.,.-..•-IJ•...:-.a•a+,F.'w.xa.,,..x.u,_.s.i,._a,a..,waur.,..www.•.....M,.+..-..-...+..A...w...w....-..._...-aA.w+w,...w..Ix,.w.....wr+....,,A�.N„W...+.�--fJ,»•...1'»en,. RECEIVED PLANNING DEC 0 5 1991 ' REQUEST FOR COMMENTS f " TO: ! f) DATE: FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 91-0015 ClECQ SHONKWtLER (NPO #5) A request for Site Development review approval to convert a 1,360 square foot single family residence into professional offices with related site improvements. ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial) The C-P zoning allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, real estate, and business support services among other uses. LOCATION: 13425 SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 2S1 1DC, tax lot 100) APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Section 18.120 Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Nom v. 4, 1991. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter t return your comments. If •you are unable,,:o respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as (' possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, CR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. !' • STAFF CONTACT: lion Pomeroy PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. • I I „ �,' , Written Commen ts . I '14 Name of Person Commenting: eXC( s Y. Phone Number: rF ,� "' �'. b 'ii/SDR91-15 a BKM - ` • 4 e • • ' . ....r ..... -i.. , .:;.{ ' ,.......t.. .4..... «JN.x—....w4.n. ....ew i—.h+ ...w.. ....... 4+..1-w.A .w..,wr... w,,.... ..e....a... r,.�-..... a. ...-. ..-..r.-w.eusi...ew....... anJ.1.:a.a+u....Wx..-_..1.K.a.F k....—r.✓4r:M 4x............x.k.wi44..n.t.11 A {{{{{{ .. REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO: �V' 1.S DATE: QDA( 161.4i1 .r •r• FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: TE a LOPMENT REVIEW SAIL 91"-2OI4 GRECO/ gggg WILE 2 (NPO #5) A request for Site Development review approval to convert a 1,360 square foot single family residence into professional offices with related site improvements. ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial) The C-P zoning allows public agency administrative services,; public support facilities, ,professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, real $. estate, and business support services among other uses. LOCATION: 13425 SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 2s1 1DC, tax lot 100) APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Section 18.120 • • Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's s statement for your revi ea. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Nov. 44, 1991. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. uerespond by the above dat e, P lease p hone the staff contact tebelowwithyourcomments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as • possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFP CONTACT: Ron Pomeroy PLEASE CHECK T FOLLOWING THE I' OLLOWI G N ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal, and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Name of Person. Commenting: Phone Number= bkm/SDR91.15.Bp • • a . ,,.., „ .,.. .. ,,.. .,-..,...n�: .+,,,r..;.l:. ..-,.,a................ .I.:._::....-..,.J....,.............a.._......x,ixl.., ..+,.,-....w,.,a .-,.+-_-.I..w..'.a'...lw-:.-...,....,. ._....,,a..u.,.xw...,,..,..a.✓1«...,.,.. .,.,,rr..,w....tin.u...w.a.........,..+,.-,...., .,-[.,w.:,.;,-. .....t..a:.....��-...,.... .+,.-.'M+:.-w.w:..-w.a.d..'..,..... (: MEMORANDUM " CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Ron Pomeroy 1November 21, 1991 FROM: Chris Davies, Development Review Engineer o : SDR 91-0015 - GRECO/SHONKWILER Description: • The applicant proposes to convert a single family 1 y residence into o professional offices . Findings • 1 . STREETS • The site is located on the southwest corner of S.W. 72nd and Fir Street . The site is somewhat unique in that it is fronted on three sides with public roads; on the east by S.W. 72nd, on the north by S .W• 1Fir, and on the west by S .W. 74th. • S .W. 72nd Ave . is clas,Itified as a major collector with the following standards; 60 feet of right-of-way and 44 feet of pavement . Currently S .W. 72nd, adjacent to the site, is fully improved except for . sidewalks . The right-of-way in front of the site varies from Z1 to 25 feet from centerline, and there is an access driveway, from 72nd, into the site , Chapter 18 .108 060, of the Community Development Code, limits direct individual access to arterial and collector streets. Since the site has access to local streets, Fir and 74th, the access point from 72nd should be abandoned, The applicant has shown, on his preliminary plan, the '.access to the site will be from S .W, Fir St and that the access on 72nd will be closed. Therefore, the applicant ,should be required to do the l i fo low n . A. Dedicated additional right-of-way to 30 feet from centerline along S .W. 72nd frontage; E Install a sidewalk along the frontage of S :W. 72nd; and C• Abandoned the access point along S .W. 72nd, S .W• FirSt . as a following - is classified a local. street with the, fol standards; 50 feet of right-of-war and 34 feet of pavement FNCIN8ER1N G COMMENTS SDI 91-15 GRR C O/SHONKWZT4tr 1 A - to ` w ■ o ._......w.Jv.w,JG.�...;...............w,.,t H.-..vw.•.....n..uF....-....,......,..i...««...r...-'« ..i ..-,.:...m.......%.- 14.....+i'a...,w....,-w_.. .«...1.,, ».-,.......r:.lih.lw,.._...,......,n....«...»..iT«r,...«.,...Lri;-..'+,r::t,.n-,w.+w...aw.«. .,.«.w...x.'.r. c«au_a a..'...'-, A Currently S .W. Fir St . , adjacent to the site, ;is fully improved . on the north side, including sidewalks. On the south side of Fir the pavement width varies, there is an extruded curb and 20 feet 'of right-of-way. Therefore, the applicant should be n• required to do the following: A. Dedicate, additional right-of-way to 25 feet from , centerline along S .W. Fir St. Frontage, and '; B. Provide half-street improvements along the frontage of S .W. Fir St . S .W. 74th Ave. is also classified as a local street. Currently S .W. 74th has no ,,improvements along the frontage of this site. .` The Development Code allows the Director to , accept a "non-- remonstrance" for improvements if the site meets certain criteria as specified in Section 18 .164 030 . This site meets the following condition under Section 18 .164.030 : Additional , , planning work is required to define the " appropriate assign . standards for the street and the application is for a project ' . which would contribute only a minor portion of the anticipated future traffic on the street. Therefore, the applicant should be required to do the following: A. Sign a non-remostrance agreement for the future improvements along S .W. 74th, and B. Dedicate additional right-of-way ht to 25 feet from • g y centerline along S.W. 74th Ave . frontage.' 2 . SANITARY SEWER: There are two existing public sanitary sewer lines that abut this property; an 8 inch line �in S .W.S.W. Fir St and a 8 inch line located in S .W. 72nd Ave. Based on the„ "as-builts" both lines appear to be adequate, size and depth, to serve the site; the applicant or applicants engineer should field verify this ' „ information pri or to the start of any work. The single family residence is currently connected to a septic r system and the applicant is requesting that the converted office be allowed to remain connected until such time as Furtler development, sys tem fF,liure or ten years whichever occurs first, It is the City' s policy that for . commercial/office development.i he site i q � c , � ,�� al/officeterno � occupancy���.f a h�rci the is required to connect to the public sys 'p r to� public system is available. This policy is consistent with Unified Sewerage Agency regulations that require sewer connection for structures within 300 feet of a public line, Therefore, the applicant should be required to connect to the public sanitary sewer system ' ENGINgERING COMMENTS: SDR 91-15 GRECO/SHONKWILER 2 / 4 A • ; 3 . STORM SEWER: There are existing public storm sewer lines available in S .W. Fir and S .W. 72nd Ave. Again, both lines appear to be adequate, size and depth, to, serve the site; the applicant or applicants engineer should field verify this information prior to the start of any work. The applicant should be required to connect any'-onsite storm system to the public system. Recommendations : ' P 1 . An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the improvement drawings . The plan shall conform to "Erosion • Control Plans Technical Guidance Handbook, November 1989 . " 2 . The applicant shall be required to connect the existing structure, to the public sanitary sewer line. 3 . Storm drainage details shall be provided as part of the public improvement plans . Calculations and a topographic map of the . • storm drainage basin area shall be provided as a supplement to the public improvement plans . Calculations shall be based on full development of the serviceable are;.. The location and capacity of existing, proposed, ' and future lines shall! be addressed. 4 Standard half--street improvements, including concrete sidewalk, driveway apron, curb, asphaltic concrete pavement, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, streetlights, and underground utilities s h all be installed alo ng the S .W. St. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to Local street standards and shall conform to the alignment of existing adjacent improvements or to an alignment approved by the Engineering Department. 5 . Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the S.W. Fir Street frontage to increase the right-of-way to 25 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline, 6 . The applicant shall install a sidewalk along the frontage of S G . 72nd Avenue. 7 . right-of-way y shall be' d to the h � Additional� dedicated Public a:Lc�ng the S .W. 72nd Avenue frontage to increase the right-of-way of--way to . 30 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline, 8 . Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the e f e to increase th feet from the centerline� ~ The description the right-of-way to S.W.S�W. � 4th A.v 25 f t . shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: ppik 91.18 G .ECO/SHONKWILER 3 r • x r , .,.,....,...._».. i..........,....- ..e....,-............u......,HM-.....i.:...,.n.,..n.«....t..r..., w:.,'..,.a..,..,i...-w,«..-....u:1-... .:«r.x...:...,........,. ..7.«o.w....4.A='.1 :a17««....a.:M..a...r ......a. r..r. ,.,,«..x ' 1 9 . An agreement shall be executed by the applicant, on forms y rovided by the• p Y City, which waives the property owner's right to oppose or remonstrate against a future Local Improvement District formed to improve S.W. 74th Avenue. 4 IN ADDITION THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS • . OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE; THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST. 1 . SECTION 18 . 120 . 060 BONDING AND ASSURANCES 1 f A. On all projects where public improvements are required r' the 'Director shall " ' x 1 . Require a bond in an amount not greater than 100 ,` percent of other adequate assurances as a condition of approval of the site development plan in order to ' ensure the completed project is in conformance with the approved plan; and r 2 . Approve and release such bonds . B. The bond shall be released when the Director finds the completed project , conforms to the approved site H' development plan and all conditions of approval are satisfied. 2 . SECTION 18 .164 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS A. 18 .164 . 030 Streets 1. Street Cross Sections: a. Surface material shall he of Class C or B asphaltic concrete; Cj " b. The final lift shall be placed on all new construction, roadways prior to City final acceptance of the roadway; however, not before 90 percent of the structures in the new development are completed unless t hree years have elapsed since initiation of construction in the development . c, The " final lift shall be Class B asphaltic concrete as defined by A »P«w 4 ,, standard • specification ecification d. No lift shall be less than 1-1/2 inches in thickness . O/S, ONt ENGINEERING C�aMMENTS : SDI 91-15 GREC WzLER 4; • • M •.,•,. .w_,...,»..U. __,«,,,_...,,....,... i, .« a.:.,,t.. _ »a _ ,,..M,,,a use ,,, a 1...,,w s axw ».,.,., d ,.. µ B. 18 .164 .120 Utilities 1 . All utility . lines including, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mou n ted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50, 000 volts or above. C. 18 .164 . 180 Notice to City Required 1 . Work shall not begin until the City has been • notified in advance. 2 . If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until tine City is notified. APPROVED: Randall R. Wool: ', City Engineer CD:s dr 9 1 1 5 :r�D . • ENGINEERING COMMENTS : �� 91-15 CR�GO�S�Or ��l� �R • ' w.:t.,,: ,:N....:w.`......r.......r:-n..l-.ur.....wr.o.«..v....a-..W.i++:.rli.4 a T.,..:e..,-1.«f.4.ii',r.ul..ri.:..k.«-.i..'✓ RECEIVED PLANNfNG •.r; ,:.., RICE OCT 3 - 199 - REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO: DATE: C.C.JS of . FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 91-0015 GRECO/SHONKWILER (NPO #5) A request for Site Development review approval to convert a 1,360 square foot single family residence into professional offices with related site improvements. ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial) The C-P zoning allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, real estate, and business support services among other use LOCATION: 13425 ` SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 2S1. 1DC, tax lot 100) APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Section 18.120 Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared a'' and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Wosr. 4, 1991. You may use the space provided below, or attach a separate letter to return your comments. f', ou are unable to Fes and by the above date, 1 ...�,.� �.�,._. Y please pbor;e the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as pissible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: R Pomeroy PLEASE C4ECI THE°FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have have no objections _ ve "reviewed the proposal and haves' �ectioxis to it. !� Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Wry t•ten Comments: • 1 t . r . r I Name of Person Commenting: (: ✓';'".� "� ` � I � �b 1' Phone Number• � �' , t bkm/SDR91-15.rn(M t; I . '441 r .� _, _ ......_, ....,,,w.-..u, w_.r....r_ ...,.... ,..,.M,,,,...r...»..., ,_.... ...aa,...,......-__._,...._.. ..a_....,. -a.xM..,,,..._..,...M..,._, I_;tr.n....w:, l...._,......»_n:.._ »...,.y�i...ir.:,.......4. r,.J%,1,. .k=mMa,.«,,..,...:n'.,.U,..a:,. .....,.. PL• ANNING RECEIVED�1 NING a , NOV 4 - 1991 ' I a' RE 'UST FOR COMMENTS TO: f2X.::J • Gt.,.C. e ,��UV∎( DATE: (2'/ . • ( I l ( FROM: Tigard Planning Department � . RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 91-0015 GRECOJSHONKWILER (NPO #5) A request for Site Development review approval to convert a 1,360 square foot single family residence into professional offices with related site . improvements. ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial) The C-P zoning allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, .5., professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, real estate, and business support services among other uses. LOCATION: 13425 • SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 2S1 1DC, tax lot 100) APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: lr � Community Development Section 18.120 Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statemei;t for your review. From • information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recomn;endation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish • to comment on this application, we need your Comments by Nov. 4, 1991. you may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your Comments. If_you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Ron Pomeroy R PLEAS CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. , Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: /14 G / ! 3. ce. i4 OPeiV _. 1 • • I � f Person Commenting: _l , Name of Pear mment�. ng 4 del " Phone Number: bkm/SDR91--15.BKM • sl r1 T 0 F l - • xk..0 , �., W ., ., . vi••.. ..•H.,..w.......,.,.,......,.aw...u.•...............s.::.w...0.Awn....w., I...,.,«.4.'-.:n.ari.,+.,..-.:.1......+:::...x«+,.::r.•..,.++.:.,...,:n:MxMl«w4.:n,+.„«,i.n a.G."-YA:..nk.«...0,:�4•':ei,.u.wi-17LaIr.A.A...+...y+.:,..:....i.4-,-..A F..,4.,.t'4..:t.:..pcwl i..d:W's:f.:...(..,r.......,,.,.1;..w«.J,X.M-,b.+,::.. sJ 4. 1. ,RERUEST FOR COMMENTS _ I r TO: tø 1 G L1Y'\s 01 ► DATE: 1 . FROM: Tigard Planning Department '• • RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 91-0015 GRECOJSHONKWILER '' (NPO �j�� A request for Site Development review approval to convert a 1,360 square c foot single family residence into professional offices with related site E . I improvements. ZONE : C-P (Professional CoGnt rcial) The C-P zoning allows o public agency administrative service public support facilities, professional and administrative ser'riceq�;; financial, insurance, real. estate, and business support services amonty' Other 'uses. LOCATION: 13425 I' SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 2S1 1DC, tax lot 100; APPLICABLE ,REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Section 18.120 Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recoNmendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Nov. 4; 1991. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate lettex to return your comments. 1 If vOu are unabla to respond by'the above date, please phone the staff contact j+ noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard j. Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Ron Pomerby_W PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: r., We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. fi Written Comments: } Name of Person Commenting: _, + Phone I�Ttunbor s Ph bkm/SDR91--15.8 • I I , , REQUEST FDRCOMMENTS TO: ,.,t„,2 r, DATE: , FROM: Tigard Planning Depaetment , RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 91-0015 GRECO 5HONKWILER (NPO #5) A request for Site Development review approval to convert a 1,360 square (, foot single family residence into professional offices with related site improvements. ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial) The C-P zoning allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, real . estate, and business support services among other uses. LOCATION: 13425 SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 2S1 1DC, tax lot 100) APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Section 18.120 : Attached is the Site Plan and applicant'e statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other 4 information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision wi • • • • SDR91--0015 o A building permit will be required for changes to the building. The building shall be required to conform to the standards for a commercial building, which will include (but not be limited to) : ramps, stairs, exits, bathroom facilities, fire extinguishers, '" glazing subject to impact, structurally able to su pp ort the design • loads for office use. o If the existing well is not to be used, it should be properly capped-off as required by the Washington County Watermaster. o The handicap parking stall shall have a total width of 16 feet (9 ft stall, 6 ft access aisle) . o With the implementation of the American Disabilities Act (ADA) , it is suggested that the applicant give consideration to providing accessibility into the building, and use of the toilet facilities It may be required as part of the ADA. Building Division br/sdr91l5 • r , a• 0 a • „•�1 .w...,Y ..... r. • , -+.__,._.....-,r ,- I...t.«,-..,..-1,.:..,........+.,.....m.gym• r.dfl'...v.fkx.....,.JAx.H...u. .1.,1 a.w.,,,...-.,...._4.,;.....«.a r-..+,....-.....w.... .,.Hsitw.».i. ,».,« y.x..,.... . I 1 i ' r REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO \_ Lre i 24� -'�' DATE: ( ( , 1 FROM: Tigard Planning Department fi . RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 91-0015 GREG O a �SBUNICWI�.EF� (ALPO #5) A request for Site Development review approval to convert a 1,360 square foot single family residence into professional offices with related site - " improvements. ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial) The C-P zoning allows ' public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, real r e: tate, and business support services among other uses. LOCATION: 13425 SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 2S1 1DC, tax lot 100) APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: , Community Development. Section 18.120 Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From : information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be pa..epired and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you *ash to comment on this application, we need your, comments'by Nov. 4e 1991. You may use the space provided below or attach a, separate letter to return your comments. If you axe unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as con as possible, If you have arty questions regarding this matter, contact the Vigard Planning aran n,g Z apartment, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Ti Bard, OR 97223. ]PMOIdE. 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: _ Ron Pomeroy I , PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections 'to it. 3t`` Please Contact of our office; r aR Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: _11:Vjayt,fre q-- _______ Nate of Persc x Comment i.ng a �" � (2. .Lty-4 t �- � l gO/C1/ I' Phone Ntaanber: r....x517 "' -`a _._ n,/SDR91-15 BKM � I I , I I,. 6 • •' .. ,. .. , ..-. _ �., . .i,. .. _ ..tr+..,,1.....,...— ,,.,. ,a.tw...' .,J..k...w'.n.,d.:'....,. ..x,.,1.........4.1 ._, ..t,w._.......,,i.,w,... M.. .w....–,..,•....w. -G..,....n.w.+M,:.n,t.-.;:.t..r....w.r,.........,-..,,.«..,..r,w .. RECEIVED PLANNING OCT 30199 ' REQX3EST. FOR COMMENTS TO ,,-�,� •�r'1z_______Lez_L�7G�X Elet- Vc. DATE: (' (141, i `"i ( FROM: Tigard Planning Department " RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT'MENT REVIEW .pprt 91-002G C2L§H NKWILER (NPQ #5) ; A request for Site Development review approval to convert � 1,360 square are foot single family residence into pro1eeaional offices with related site improvements. ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial) The C-P zoning allows ' public agency administrative services, public support facilities, . professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, real estate, and business support services among other uses. LOCATION: 13425 SW 72nd Avenue I�WCTM 2S1 1DC, tax lot 100) APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Section 18.120 . , Attached is the S it e Plan and d a p licant statement n t for review. From rem inforimation supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared , and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Nov. 4e 1991, you may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. z£ you are unable to respond key the above date,, please phone the staff contact F' noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as � possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard • Planning Department, PO Box. 23397, 13125 SW ntall Blvd., Tigard, OP, 97223. PHONE: STAFF CONTACT; Ron Pome �M1 PLEASE CFECC THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: ' ..r. We have reviewed the proposal and have no obaectione to it. . Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments JJ I' • I t � Name of Person Commenting: •• _ * ---r,—; • . Phan utr N1 be r. ," � bkm/SDR91-15. iIC ?� • I E" JJJJJJ I i IItt,,