The URL can be used to link to this page

SDR1991-00014 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. rHhr:w�13�p...y,,.wrn.ln�'7,Y1:1',"Y:Wf}["m,�rve. wty,rlKe • r 111111111111 ' . I PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION FILE NO SDR 91-0014 FILE TITLE: FOY / WESTWOOD CORPORATION , APPLICANT: Gerald Foy OWNER: Westwood Corp. 3030 SW Moody 3030 SW Moody 4, Portland, OR 97212 Portland, OR 97212 REQUEST„ gn& LOCATION: Applicant requests site Development Review approval to develop an approximate 46,192 square foot home improvement store, a 2,550 square foot general retail store and .• , related parking facilities at the Tigard Towne Square shopping center. ZONE: C-G (General Commercial) . LOCATION; 16200 SW Pae3.fic Highway (WCTM 251 15BA, leA,X itA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Professional Commercial NPO NO: 6 NPO CHAIRPERSON: Sue Carver PHONE NUMBER: 639-8507 , - CHECK ALL WHICH APPLY: X STAFF DECISION COMMENTS DUE BACK TO STAFF ON 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME:2:30 HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME:7:00 CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME:7:30 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND ATTACHMENTS: X VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPING PLAN .JL NARRATIVE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN _ X SITE PLAN OTHER: PREPARE FOR PLANNER APPROVAL: , JL ADVERTISEMENT * TIGARD TIMES OREGONIAN Y' , e x NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS TO BE MAILED• LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE OF APPLICATION NOTICE TO DLCD ATTACHMENTS: 's I STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Offer CODE SECTION: 18. 120 USE LISTINGS: eiv±c'---U'se---Typesi, Public agency administrative services, public support facilities, amorg ,othes; 0Gmmeraial—Uae Typd§: Professional and administrative services, general retail sales, financial, insurance and real estate services, business support services,4-among—other8; Residential—Vse—Typew: Single- ' faMily residential units, among other8. 1.; • F AA '.* C . ._...4...m SITE DEVELOPMINT REVIEW APPLICATION -. pro*, MOPW1 TI IV CITY OF TI(' I 0 �A S. R 3 � H 1 . PO 2.53 '� , l SW all Box 97 °a -. ,.; Tigard, Oregoxl� 97223 (503) 539-4171 , FOR STAFF USE ONLY - CASE Nor / ' / ,/ OTHER CASE NO'S: A)7 . RECEIPT NO. q/ -- APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: '; •.._,. DATE: _A:2- f 1 ; 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Application elements submitted: I '.' � . PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION /C,` o St.�„,7 .e...e 1, . j,''("A) Application form (I . 1' ,.. 1... A* k,__ ►a...r 2..� - . . I lip lB) Owner's signat.ure/wr3 tteu TAX MAP AND 2AX LOT 0 T. N0. , ,5/.>'°'.5 .54 4. �oc'it, i4,/ authorization ►i/c/a.. I r ��/ (C) __ �� 6 i (1) •i\.. "" ..',`, SITE SIZE . Lai` l :a= � : . 4D -4, A. (b) 0l) J ; . . ' t. PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER* J C,,.,.;..t�.'.,e9e2. •„ t,/( ) P1• r � �� E fan ( �i°c iI ADDRESS O O,S .I a PHONE ,. ,2A. . 2,00 0 P A:p a'eantas statement I ' CITY t.L�►el y C3e_. ZIP 92.2,/a, (pre-app checklisYilltAif ' APPLICANT* e . LL (G) .4+ :ti ;.." ►ti ADDRESS s _ 4 4 PHONE -;,4 6 ._� . , . . e.e.tik.+110) CITY "1''` — ZIP ' `, ' .) , 2.. 1---11),) Filing fee (1 ,51/1 ,,'""- )' ` When the owner and the applicant are different (1) ConStructinn Cost Estirriat . people, the purchase , � • ple,� the applicant must be th purchaser of record .: � p 4 ' or a leasee in possession with written authorization DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE: • from the owner or an, agent of the owner with written authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application , p c . p page. two or 'FINAL DECISION' DEAD ;, � pp` ion in the space provided on o o. DEADLINE:j submit a written authorization with this application. COMP. PLAN/ZONE DESIGNATION: 2. PROPOSAL SU' AR "" . The owners of record of the subject property request site development review approval to N.P.O. Number: allow '140.. C".r , ir.c.ot. e .t Approval 1Date m , ! CC e,, r',�s Final Approval Date: a n •' . P'lni n Engineering ng a 052 /15P I te , Rev'd 5/87 !M r • ■ ", ,. L, . ., h 3. List any variance, conditional use, sensitive lands., or other land use actions At be considered .as part of this application: 4. Alpplacants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments described in the attached . infpo t4.on* Asheet aat the time you submit this application s� > ,� r ;M a1 r�, .. 5. THE APPLICANT.(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon, the subject property. 1 B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted, in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • i'. t, i C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this , application, may be .revoked ' if it is found that any .such statements are false. • D. The applicant has read the entire, contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving Or denying the application. ,w• � DATED this . Wr w J< 2day o l . . � , g SIGNATURES of each owner' (eg. husband and wife) of the subject property. ■ (1 SL:pm/ 1524P) .. , , , , , Fia.,,„,,,, tgorovi .,Subject: Tigard Towne Square (Wd good Corp. ), Durham Rd. & 99W k',.. ' • To: DICK `X-To; chris_d, brad, viola, dick Date: 16 Oct 91 14:50:16 • :For your information: Today Pat and I met with Jerry Foy of Westwood Corp. and two of his colleagues. They are proposing a building to complete the shopping center and wanted to find a way to escape the TIF charge, since they paid SDC fees , '; on the entire center in 1987 and also made substantial off-site improvements in 1987. At that meeting, we suggested several things which may be of interest to you: 1. We encouraged them to go through a pre-app. for this buil,Ung to assure :...that there are no surpr i. later. TIF, storm drainage fees, and new storms drainage regulations are . ems that are of potential concern. l offered e.o sit in on the pre-app, if desired, since I am familiar with their past SDR. 2. They propose to build 45,000 sq. ft. of building and 15,000 sq. ft. of display yard for lumber and nursery stock. I told them that the TIF would ' be based on only the 45,000 sq. ft. I talked to Tom Harry at Washington • ' , County and he confirmed this interpretation of TIF ordinance. n 3. I told them that the .TIF will be based on Category 823 (Shopping Center) 4 unless they can show us otherwise. They expect to show us that it should be classified under Category 812 (Building materials/lumber) or Category 817 (Nursery) or some combination of the two, giving them a lower TIF. • 4. We told them that we know of no way to grant them rel ief from TIF and no ' way to grant a TIF credit for the street improvements they completed in 1917. They thought''Tim Ramis knew a way to grant credits. Pat Will explore this issue with Tim. They did pay SDC on the full development in 1987 and ", later received an SDC rebate for their off-site improvements. " i 4 r i , s V k I a l a,, .I ` q e'•da .... _. ...w.,:y..,.-,,.....-...w '.i...... _.,.1.,«w..,...,_ ... ...., -., „, ,. .-,_.. _ ,..,_ ., ,..� .. .. _ _ _ ....ti...,_........—........e.• ..,, v...,,x.c..e. a.,.ua ,,..w-........ ,. ., I \I CITY OF TIGARD w PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES ' DATE: Oat(3e12- 9.9, 199 APPLICANT: Elk INIST. 146POE Si4f5PLy AGENT coo "z ) S- Phone: ..�� Phone M- 1it"'�"'^' +�.v� PROPERTY Lo+cATioN ADDRESS: __ • E ! t __ C_ _ I . . s TAX NAP & TAX LOT: NECESSARY APPLICATION S �-, wk• • PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: �'1 • ZONING DESIGNATION: C:- E 4 ' NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION # (�� ` CIiAIRP'ERSON: t C PHONE: (a 3 t .- ".* c . ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS i ,Minimum lot size: -sq. ft. • 4 Minimum lot width: , 60 ft. Setbacks: front- ft. side-- ( ' ft., rear-j.'',ft garage- ft. corner- ft. from both streets. Maximum site coverage: i Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: lb ft Maximum building height: ,4 ft ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum ''lot frontage: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created at part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or l have a min imum 15 foot wide access • , ,. easement; Maximum lot depth to width ratio of 2.5 to 1. • SPECIAL SETBACKS SETBACKS •w- ,. „ .t, Streets: ft: from centerline of 2.r�'.� �' t Est'abliehed areas: "a• ft. from `� •'• w...,,- 71' ' 1 '' I • Lower intensity zones: a ft., along the site's G i.4.4-k boundary i . • Fleg' lot:" 10 ft. side yard setback j Accessory structures: up to 528 sq. ft. in size=5 ft. setback from side ;I I and rear 'lot lines `, Accessory s . ft • A: ry strtzrtures. up to 1000 sq. ft. (where allowed) ' - ' See 1, 'r. applicable zoning district setbacks I 1 • Zero lot lin e lots: minimum 10 foot separation between... buildings Multi family residential building separation: See Code Section 18.96,030 • i I • . , t e I f • ; , r , I U + , t r �' 'h I \ ' . ' , l' ,i. d SPECIAL BUILDING HDIGET PROVISIONS • 25 ft. whichever is less height of 2-1/2 2 Fla Maximum hei h f 1 2 stories or Flag Lots: M.ax�.m g / j in most zones; 2-1/2 stories or 35 ft. in R-7, R-12, R-25 or R-40 zones if standards of Code Section 18.98.030(B) are met. Buildin4„Bei h.t.g eptibns (Code Sectionhia:'88,:020) bu )t,. Lng" located in • a non-residential zoneinaybe built to a height of 75 feet provided: .� A minimum FAR (building floor area to site area ratio) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; at. least 1 2 � � � � � �2. � All ,actual building setbacks�will be � 2 �Pi ct g the building's height; and 3,. The structure will not abut a residential zone district. ., c' RESIDENTIAL DENSITY CALCULATION '. Community Development Code Chapter 13.92 specifies that the net residential units,,.., ?i.,awed on a particular site may be calculated by .« number o dividing the urea o �the� developable area� b�. the� imum numb r f eluare feet equixed per dw ling unit in the app1i0,.• .e zoning district. A' Wet devel ent area is calasilated by subtrac , g the following land area(s) om the gross site are: : ,; , 1,. All sensitive lands • eas - land within the 100 .-ear f.oodplan slopes exceeding 25% w ra rainagerays t'and dedicated for s-r'ko'urpoaes 3. Public right-of- y dedic-tion 4. All land prov"..ed for pr'vate streets (includes accesswa•ys through p ng areas) The City • `. «. allows a reside nti-1 density transfer of up to 25% of the units that could otherwise have seen developed on sensitive lands areas listed in (1) above to the d=-.ei opabie portion of the site in i' \ accordance with Code Seotian 18.92.03 . ` the a�o °l' ant for a residential develop ment It is the responsibility of th ,L P P �.• app1ieation to provide a detailed ca culation for permitted residential ' density and density transfer. RESIDENTIAL DEVLOPAENT SOLAR ACCESS REQUI LENTS 1, Effective May 1,. 1991 all subdivision.. and minor parbiti lily 11', pN I ' option requires at least 32% of the glass and 500 square feet of the !; ; r roof area to face south and be protected from shade. Total or partia exemptia' of a site from the solar access requirement can t be for the f« lowing reasons L 1. Eas., west or north slope steeper than 20%. I 2. Oft-site shade sources (sts ctures, vegetation, topogr. °'y) 3 0 -site shade sources (vegetation). Adjustm-nts allowing reduction of t S0% solar , design requirement can , , be for , he following reasons: 1. Re aced density or an incre-.-td cost of at least five percent due S to: 4 - east, rest or no rsl ope gr:ater than 10%, - significan natural feature, - existing rr oad or lotting n g pat.ern, .- public easement' or right-of- ay. ;. 2. Reduction in important devlela went l amenities, 3. Pre--existing shade (vegetation). •. I I , Maps and text sufficient to show the development complies with the solar design standard, except for lots for which an exemption or 'adjustment is' . • required, including all of the folio -ing items ' 1.. The north-south lot dimension d front lot line orientation of each proposed lot. 2. Protected solar building fines and relevant building site restrictions, if applicable. 3 For th0 purpose of identifyirg trees exempt from Ssution F, a map • showing existing trees at l ast 30 feet tall and over 6 inches diameter at a point 4 feet above grade, including their height diameter and species, and st*ting that they are to be retained and are exempt. 4. Copies of all private restr':ctions relating to solar access., ( ' If an exemption or adjustment i= requested, maps and text sufficient to • Show that given lots or areas in -he development comply with the standards for such an exemption or adjust' ent shall be submitted. RESIDENTIAL DENSITY TRANSITION Regardless of the allowed k Busing density in a zoning district, any property within 100 feet o a designated established area shall not be developed at a density greater than 125 percent of the maximum I. Cc:,mprehensive Plan designation (not zoning) of the adjacent parcel. 47 PAZING AND ACCESS " . , Required automobile parking for this type of user G tom✓ S$ Secondary use required parking: tl.: , ..,"..:. s d f required spa ces ma y be e desi mate d compact-only spaces.aces. �7 St andard parking space d imensions: 9 ft. X 18 ft. 1 • Compact parking space dimensions,: 8.5 ft. x 15 ft. �, andi c apped parking: All parking areas providing ng in exce ss of five required automobile arkin spaces shall provide appropriately located and / designated handr capped parking spa ceS. T he minimum number of handicapped �� r 9 I I I II i `I • I t' I I I I , I I I }} , I • h\C; . ♦ q(li' 1 ,61 N r � y I. ♦ 1 ) qI ' . ' I r r � -_ .,_ _.• ..0 n.J-.. ,,......._....a...... . ......,,,.._n.. -, -- , _ - _..., a... i.... it r- .... i......1 ...F r I ,I•" i ` Nf parking spaces to be provided and parking space size,are mandated by the Pe Oregon Revised Statutes (see handout). A handicapped parking space . h ,; symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be provided. ` Bicycle racks are required for civic uses, non-residential uses, commercial uses, and industrial uses providing 15 or more automobile parking spaces. Bicycle parking must be provided at a ratio of one bicycle rack space per 15 auto parking spaces. Bicycle racks shall be • located in areas protected from automobile traffic. The Planning Division can provide' specifications for ra PP approved bicycle rack types. All parking areas and driveways must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: „ Minimum number of accesses Minimum access width: Maximum access width: �. Pedestrian access must be provided between building entrances and parking areas;, outdoor common areas, and public sidewalks and streets. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and 4 ,; accesses, see Community Development Code Chapters 18.lO6 and 18.108. CLEAR VISION APJA The City requires that clear vision be maintained between three and eight feet above grade at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections in specified clear vision areas. The size of the.required clear vision area depends upon the abutting streets functional classification. LANDSCAPING Street trees are required for all developments fronting on a public or private street or a driveway more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six feet of the right,-of-way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper cf two inche s at fou r feet above grades Street r, ` trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on mature tree size. Further_ information on regulations affecting street trees and a list of • ' recommended street trees may be obtained from the. Planning Division. • minim one per seven parking p s must be planted in and around parking areas in order t provide a canopy effect. Landscaped screening of parking areas from views from public rights-of-way must be r } P ovic�ed. • Page 4 • • 4.• • • • • D i n I 4 ! ;e • a....:......... ..,,:.m,., .,,_._..:.,.......,.„.w-,..r.... .va...'_'.e..,. ,rwm.,,»..,.,i,.,... ......,..,_.__ -.,. ,,... ..,e.,.......,.w_...,..w.aa._.,._.._....,.. .-.,,.,.. ...- ... .. • 1.r (..,., BUFFERING AND SCREENING In order to increase privacy and to reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts between adjacent developments, especially between different _ land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site , b perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs. Site obscuring screens or fences are also i . required in some cases, and often are advisable even if not required. ` .,r . Required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, ; " % utilities, and sidewalks. ` • materials and may be teri.al information on required buffer area z�a y fi:• Additional. a.nfarm c� • found in Code Chapter 18.100 and the Planning Division bulletin On ri: .; • landscaping and buffering. `. Required buffer widths applicable to your proposal area: � , _ ft M along 'north boundary ft. along east, boundary ; ..�� ft. along south boundary .._ ft. along west boundary 1' � In addition, sight obscur' g screening is required along Ca-`-�.1 G�. "'.(A SIGNS Permits must be obtained before erecting any sign in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. • Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if « the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development application. . cSENSITI' ANDS 0 e1 eGVCh j1/ce ` , ./,/ , . ADDITIONAL PLANNING CONCERNS OR COMMENTS r . , I , I I • ■ g - a _. . _'ii \` _ , r 1 i .. r i ', . . ir „- .., ........-. ..r.r.,-+4..+,.iJU...-..M4Wid.-.,f:?'::..S.i.P-...amq...l-:+r.Y:»-r• 3 "'r, PROCEDURE ` :.�_Xl.. Administrative staff review. "4;• Public hearing before the land use hearings officer. • i Public hearing before the ;Planning Commission. </ ," .``,., ,,, _ Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. Another public hearing is held by the City Council. d i All applications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff member at the Community Development Department counter at City Hall. Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications submitted after 4:30 P.M. on Thursday will be batched for processing with the following week's applications for,9rocessing. No applications will be accepted after 3:00 4. P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other days. .. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded in advance to 8.5 by 11 inches , One 8.5 inch by f 11 inch: map of a proposed project should be ' ' submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. : 4 .` The Planning Division and Engineering Division will do a preliminary , review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 10 days of submittal. Staff will notify an applicant if additional information or copies of the submitted materials are needed. r The administrative decision/public hearing atypically will occur.' approximately 45 to 60 days after an application i.s accepted as complete by the planning Division. , Applications involving difficult issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to ,' review. Written decisions are issued within 10 days of the hearing. A 10 day appeal period follows a1l eciaiorns.: .An r+ppeal on this matter Mould ' be heard by the. J u ' &4 i S 5 ` it t I A basic flow diagram illust rati ng the review process is available from t he Planning D ivision. , The pre-application conference and the notes of the, conference are intended to inform the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to development of a particular site and to allow the staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints'� •�`�' � pp affecting development of the site. The � � conference and notes cannot cover all. Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your Site plan. ` 1 Failure of the staff to provide any information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is •.recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements.prior to submitting an application. .• A nothe Pre-application, conference is required if a s,T% application is to be . . submitted more than six Months a fter this pre-application conference, unless the second conference is deemed' unnecessary by the Planning 1 Division, P,PEPAfD BY t JL \/ �"""R ,,t'""l ` P�..t�t*INC bI �tSIoN ��` y' i7 Pilo N : 659-1=-111 I I ., Page . r 1 4 n _.. g_ � '� - - _ - _ _ __ __ ... . - . . 1 - I iiii, 44." ,- The Ci y o j TIGAIRIJ }T { ft E . . 11 - - #11■ _ j I i - Ili Ir' ` t = y-■ - # 1:7,_- k •E # )P * - f- ,4.- -. / .<'< > # 4: _ .,...,.., ..... ._ ..,_: _ . _ _ _ ...„../ _ \ \\ 4, .._ , I_ kNy/ ---) g ,...., _s* IS • 1 DURHAM :s3 : I ` S i t e Area a \\,\N>. .., _ . - Fs - 4 ,. th,_ _ _. 7 p;',. --'......, . 1... 2`.-- - -. _4- _ �m\54▪ ;�� - - - - - - { -- _.■ •41:4 i' _ _ _ __ 1. _ --- _ -_ ---- - >a ".,te\ <�.�` _ - _ - - - - _ - - _ _- -_ s'_ -�`aS:VA..mss"``L f,!- � - - 1' „- �' - S'`R„'.. a „'• „ - - - - -_ _ - - _ -# 4th i \ t5O �<. ,v tea• - - - - _ -_ - • --;�a°'4m tic '�,� ”' ..N.• `-m,`,` ---C: CFgttol data r Map-reQr¢ s4s- iF of Tigard a lirFe ,'a _ rr------ -��,�� ?kit f farnatFos System..- ,;- I - &!S} settwore_ Faf¢r— { ly�. i metien partrnxad kere 4,T 1.114.;{; may be is tended La be - _ usa additional tscksicuI u iur - - s $ irsatrprLtQtIF4 data I ail daiarrxFne� Dy ti_�+^ iht City ai figLrr x :*2`:-.r: `� e, {IIPSR tI4) 1_ =n Kati {11/I3FH) _._. i ri - • ,, w • • • . COMMUNITY NEW PAPER , INC. Legal ' Notice IT 701' P.O.BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 _ ' - ---------- ::.r-..,.•1_.<<-— - •R. • r ,. ,,,,, .�. $ITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 91-0014 • Legal Notice Advertising FOY/WESTWOOD (NPO#6'� , The Director has approved,subject to conditions,a Site]Development • • Tigard fFC 0 2 19 ® [� Taaarsheet biotic Review request to develop,an approximately 46,192 square foot genera of igard retail store and related parking facilities at the Tigard Towne Square shop- . ' .,1 ox 23397 (' 6 OF TIGARI�, ping center.ZONE:C-G(General Commercial).The C-G zoning allows s*� OR 97223 y 6' 0 Duplicate Affida public agency administrative services,public support facilities,profes- sional and administrative services,general retail sales,financial,in '' e surance,real estate services,business support services,and single-family , residential units among other uses.LOCATION: 16200 S.W.Pacific ,M. Highway(WCTM 2S1 1513A,tax lot 101). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA:Community Development Code Section 18.120. —.AFFIDAVIT OF '" $ i Ste, � r►1+� 0, 1 F WASHINGTON, ) ��`4* `� Ie 'iii�v# . m,." tip`° M duly swain, depose and say t l an`�trc �vertisinc� I,�'� �' . P his principal clerk, of tha l s e%,eer of eneral circp ation s defined in ORS 193.010 ,u.j 6 . to o 0 '; .� ' '0 0`published at_.. .,.,•_In the n _ . I � { MI county and state,that the I ' elo r 'er1t ma s „- t 1_,�� . r' V i ' • ' opy of which is hereto annexed, was published in than • 0 of said newspaper for Qne , successive and i�',+',:,. , �� , e in the following.issues: „ �,. ,;,.1r•;, '4• 44••••441'�J :"---L7--T""zz..;",/___,, / 7 ,,,, . ,Z, mon , """ ,-* 0 .. '11 .. ---_-T--- - , / 0 .o.,__________ , ... ,.. . t,, ., . .., . • t ,,,),, i / , , /,„,...," ,.., 1 in , \•,..., fir..o.„ •, , ,t.,.. ' I ,, .,„, , . , , . . . _. ............._____ , , 1st day of November i , _., ,_:1171_1_11, • . ,. sworn o m d and � wrrxr before me thaw. i ;r � .`. � The adopted finding g of facts, decision, conditions can be ' r ,r obtained from the Planning Department,Ti b -�Civic Center, 13125 S.W, "' Hall Blvd.,P.O.Box 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223.The decision shall be 'il . Note Public for Oregon "' final on December 41.Any party to the decision may appeal this i . , . , , - decision in accordance with Section 18.32,290(A)and Section 18.32,370 � ��lesion xplras. Ilir 9,-9.....3 � ��of the�ommianity Development Code,which provides that a written lap- r i. 4 dead- line filed within 10 days P.M.lc is gieriand sent.'X"he dd- '° �I filing ' appeal notice�t :,..,�..199i. .ii. To 104–Publish November 21,1991. • I i' I •, • 1 • .1 �r a • 1 Ir. • ' o. A ,1•tl•!• •}�, a: • o • b , � � � r •�•, Y .,w. ...N...=.a .., ♦.x:.t. an,.nt•+. . ..•• x.A.Y.,,.».14.w...1.<'..YWtiu+ I.k-Yw.n4G1 4Y.44A1 ..a t ... , • A RA r— r 'G •' REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO; � DATE: November 14,__1991 � FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 91-OO14 kg WESTwoop (NPO #6) A request for Site Development Review approval to develop an approximately 46,192 square foot general retail store and related parking facilities at the ' Tigard To w ne Square shopping center. �O�� C-G (General Commerczal). i; •' The C-G zoning allows public agency admini. trative services, public ]P support facilities, professional and administrative se, vices, general r , retail sales, financial, insurance, real estate services, business support • services, and single-family residential unite among other uses. LOCATION: 16200 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 2S1 15T3A, tax lot 101) APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Section. 18.120. • •3 Attached .4 4 the Site Plan, applicant'a statement, and Notice of Decision for your review. If you wish to comment on this replication, or appeal this decisiorzv we need your Comments by Dec. 4, 1991. ' u may use the space provided below' or " attach a separate letter to return you' omments. If you are unable to_rea'cond • by the aloe date. please phone the st,' contact noted, below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. if you have any • questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box i • 21.97, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, UR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Offer • PLEASE CHECF( THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY We have'revie ed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact' of our office 7' Please refer to the enclosed letter, Written Comments: Name of Person Commenti Phone Number: ,e bkm/SDR91.-i4.B M •e I to NOTIFICATION LIST FOR ALL APPLICATIONS 1. NPO NO. .' ..'2, pies CPU j' .._._._. , n 2. CIT'' DEPARTMEN ' , " B it n g o ficial/Br ad R. Parks & Recreation Board '' ' ' Police ity Recorder . 1 Field Operations Coordinator/Viola Engineering/Chris s .m ' . 3. SPEC 'XL DIS CTS - Fire District School Dist No. 48 \ (Pick-up box) ('Beaverton) Joy Pahl " PO Box 200• Beaverton, OR 97075 . 3, K Tigard Water District School Dist;. 23J. S' 8777 SW Burnham St. �' (Tigard) Tigard, OR 97223 ' 13137 SW Pacific Hwy,' Tigard, OR 97223 Tualatin Valley Water District l' 1 a' , . _._._. 6501'SW Taylors Ferry Rd. Tigard,, O 97223 y 4 . 4. AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS' Wash. Co.'Land 'Use & Transp. Boundary Commission 1 . 150 N. First Ave, 320 SW Stark Room 530 Hillsboro, OR 97124 Portland, OR •'97204 Brent'Curtis Kevin Martin ,- METRO i . Joann Rice ___ 2000 SW let ave., Scott Kin Portland, OR 97201-5398 9 "_'_ Fred Eberle ,` Mike Borrsson I DLCD (CPA's only) !I • City of Beaverton 1175 Court St. NE Jim Hendryx Salem, OR, 97310-0590 P^ Box 4755 eaverton, OR 97076 -___,_ Other " City of King City City of Durham f' City Manager City Manager �, 15300 SW 116th 17160,'SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd. ' King City, OR 97224 Tigard, OR', 97224 ` City of Lake Oswego City of Portland City Manager Planning Director , 380 SW,A 1120 SW 5th , ake Oswego, OR 97034 Portland, OR 97204 • State Highway Division Bob Doran • PO Box 25412 Portland, OR 97225-0412 . . SPECI AGENCIES , General Telephone __ tland,General Elec. • Russ Wells Brian Moore 12460 SW Main St. 14655 SW Old Scholia Fry. Bard, OR 97223 '9aaverton, OR ,97007 ' NW Natural Gas Metro Area Communications . Scott Palmer '- Jason Hewitt . 220 NW Second Ave. Twin Oaks Technology Center Portland, 'OR 97209 1815 NW 169th Place 5-6020, 1, •. , Beaverton, OR 97006-4686 `. ' 'TCI CableviSion of Oregon ___" Mike Ballock US West 3500 SW bond St. .._._M. Pete'Nelson I. , . •'''r Portland, OR 91201 421,SW Oak St: Portland, OR 97204 Columbia Cable' (Frank Stone) "......_.'14200 SW BrigadoOn:Ct. I , Beaverton, OR 97005 ,. 6. STATE` AGENCIES I Etgineer bivision Df State I,arids , Aeronautics b ) Division Of State Park iv.' (OD - BoArd of Health _„•., Vieth a Wildlife - 7" Parka ix Recreation DiV. ;� I,CDC { subdivision Supervisor • ,, , bep t. of Ener gy Dept �riviro n. Quality FkMardba 11' r ' Other 7. , __ . Corps. of Engineers Other__ k ,.._.� Post Of fide 1 6. OTHER Sodthern Pacific Transportationldompany , ' t ier e' LS Pro ec 3Cn r+ . '�Fo P I Dharlrs M rn y� g 800 NW 6th'Mentlgi R.' X24, Minion station Portland; OR L91209 • • ., .l', .._..- .. . , ..,...,, ,,,... ,..,.,,..,,.a-...,+...... - _.....,,.,...w......«aa,,.,,....w„*.'_a.,♦...,n....,i_...ia..,.....u..oui i....u.:,w..anao-,.....,...wu..-.a, ...,«„..,....-•, ...«....,.,...... -, ,n,.u w.�iwrl':u,,..rn:-q:V:«lw-x:..:;:.:w'..a+..a.u♦,-.+.rw„H.:w.w..«.-. 5815 SW PATTOT?♦ R•OA:D '''•PORTLAND, OR fi ,�. %.,, •. • 25115A0.-0,1700 . 2S115A0-0 ,2700 .... .. ; BISHOP, LAVERNE -- ESTATE OF STEVENS, LARRY: D/JULIE F ' 1008 BALBOA AVE 16425 SW 113TH ' . BUR.LINGAME CA 04010 TIGARD OR 97224 ' �' ' 2S115A0°02703 25115A0°02704 .•• . •.•• • .• ...'. . .•• •. ' ' ' . MOFFAT, NORMAN R FOSTER, ROBERT B AND PATRICIA ANN KATHERINE E �, ' j 16445 8W 113TH AVE 16565 SW 113TH TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 • 2$115A0-02705 • • • •.•.• • • .,• • • . . . 2S115A0r-02801 BRAID-BROADWAY ASSOCIATES CRAIG, JAMES N AND VICKI J : • KARNO, NORTON S 16325 SW 113TH AVE -, 16255 VENTURA BLVD SUITE 1200 TIGARD OR 97224 ENCINO ' CA 91436 r . i l 2S11540..02803 25115A0-03100 .... N MUIR, HOBERT H WESTWOOD CORPORATION, y+ 16285 SW 113TH DEVELOPERS & CONTRACTORS ' , TIGARD OR 97223 I 3030, SW MOODY AVE ' PORTLAND OR 97201 2S115BA..■00102 2S115BA°00103 WESTWOOb HOLDING CORP ' WESTWOOD HOLDING CORP ' • 3030 SW MOODY 3030 SW MOODY ;' PORTLAND OR 97201 'PORTLAND OR 97201 1 2S110DC°00400 2S110DC°00500 .e•. •. • DURHAM / 99 ASSOCIATES ' LUTON,' ROBERT C • LIMITED' PARTNERSHIP BY TUALATxN DEVELOPMENT CO l � , . , t BY CARL MARKS REALTY SERV. PO BOX 8041 '' 77 WATER STREET b' I BLACK BUTTE RCH OR 97759 NEW YORK CITY NY 10005 ' . e •••.e • • • • • 25110DC•-00600 25110DC—x1300 . • e • eeN • • os. LUTON, ROBERT C COAST FINANCE INC PO B. . OX 8041 , I 11205 SW SUM1vLERkryTELD DR j RLACK BUTTE RCH OR 97759 TIGARD OR 97224 ` H . 2S11ODC-00 700 .• ee: ••• •• • . . . . . . ie 25110D0-00800 . . ..• .•. . . " T FARWEST ASSOC SU�RFIELD COAST, FINANCE INC 11205 SW SUMMERPIELD DR TANGLEWOOD ASSOCIATES TIGARD OR. 91224 724• P .. •,. CM ASSOCIA4I`ES 400 SW SIXTH AVE, #1106 PORTLAND OR 97204 • c, %, . ■ e. WASHINGTON COUNTY OREC . F SEE MAP cr. j 25 1 t }D0 SCALE 1 = 20 9 904302.98 1L 4�� 4%1, ' __ TF?Ac1 t32 j {�0 _ ' _ 73-29 # -- t g l• 1 1 .....,./ 25 �� I m _ t V.- J f �. --_ - -_- - - - 4 -_ - - - - . k- 'n. E i ;. Asa '° ?:. A g'n E •- 5 9 4' ev !.Om • t X500:. T .� , 3.T9Ac . _ t o SEE MAP ,f 7 -- -- _ _ _ T Q L� u 2S t 15 BA I.' r 1802 0 4n er I 1: ./6Ac. r 2C_ElASEFiEiiT ** . .Zb?:�E� 6Z9.Fi6 N 9° 7. =1 .,. . ' 1801 803 -.Z8OI 00.4-_ { r 198Ac --,�l.62 Ac. 0 lSQ4` :9.98- - }} i. 19 en 1900 - n I 2.8.5 its.. 0 N f • 0 ..r 2E7.62 3E9°421E. SSo, - _ 2 83. ' _ 2 z 1901= .. ` `�3�'' 100 5�S' _ — O See CS !0570 - 3 ^ _ _ 1 2. Ac 3�8p .. ■. .2.76 A-C.s 1 3.78 _ 6„., , , . r� l PI a c f 3 29' ~ ZZO 'Sfi� al 432'.0 150+0 A 0 210! 2100 t . ° o` 2702 , .864c. a 3.6QAe_ 70'5 - 104 '. -3SAc_�_ d3,�c: N 2 . - - f6, G: 2.14 A4 obi • 0 I 150.0 (CS. No, n 13139, = - 20 i° - >_., r . 2 L..._.— 437.0 - 4- 6078. o 2200 - 7'' 3Z'f e 2. 6 60 40 CO W - - _--- _ - - - -_ _ - - T - - - -_- - -- -. i _ 2600 WEST ;;94' to !_fig AC. r • r ' Jm _ _ _ r m g ` ' f • s - a78� - r g -�GQO- - 7 .32'Es_ _- - - e _ I. WEST 394 1 x.500 - l', t �1 i Z �� . SEE MAP Z 3 : 25 l 3[) 4• 155 27'W 112301 -•96 Ac .es�� 2305 -® - _ (C S N-o 10841) .- -- _ - 0 1:6046. - N• - i • N ' N - _ t _ , .8 850 2 E _�1-- _ . ,- t7S�' 155 i -8- 13 _ --- - ' - - 527 - N 5a0 1 2400 ++s • �r `� - 1 1. Z At. 1 I l 78 Ac- - 2 304 - i f . • '" 6Ae •1 i —74 - :_IO T �1 _ = 2 7'E 12303 ao' --, 2300 . --. x ,86 Ac. . • - i .. o ._- -\_ • - - 1 - 3e5=27E-13 0 I /� f 2501 j g .TSAc. in - I -�.I- /' o • - /, f'.. = N - //j�jfr/: • /:j ' r�y It - CENTER QF. f 1 '� r 8Gi•i9Fi-�- - - •[/j'-.` -. It 1.� • - b-aO' #A/k- _'_ /31 E SAP 1 SEE_ M`AP- 2 S 1 15 J a --- - -- -- 2S-I' 5C -- '" - - �. r .../f/eL _ .._ # - - -i t *gi g - . t Y t - _ ° `R-' -•_ _t - '} `.. Q - N ' - �� r- _ 1. - .. b- -.• t +--C.,.L, i- I LJ P A t !Li t C. 0 r i =L V I I v v iv, z-"‘0 a a v v ri 5K:INGTON COUNTY OREGON: _r: is SCALE -- 100 r. ICANCELLED TAX LOTS- g ,_ a 503,604.200,.3.00,400,SEE MAP t - --- - - - ---- - -- - - - - - - -- - MAP - -- - - _. 2J�' t lO dC e t Ia 9/ , ! � r a . 2g_,6. C x? NQ j� /4 CORNER € 1320' 1 t — — - ^- l elf 22S/ C-R. NO. 429 I- . j r»� 8E..CR429I3,4_ � —— — — - -: .--mss. VACATED R50 75-'L9 T ' r_ Ia' _ - y o r ' e.a5 - [00 1 - 3.36 Ac_ c r I ��l o f ''' CGS.22,812) 73.29 x M to f 8g 4 co I 200`N 89°55`20°�tl I 7`° x x.._ 1 / Z 3,x. r- 430.2_ '� m r_ - - - - , - / - - - - - �� _� - - - - - - - - L�f` / a ` n 3 p �C f RQ &s� E • SEE MAP i 5A 1,I,;'',-. -- _ . a� M r' N /i!".. iu : 0, - K? , / cj / Qri 1: - E� ., 644.3%_ 7 ...\''', _ 23:74 Lt- , ._. 44.i I .1-® o a� • .•. t, i t. O J = ° r. 2t►'bt,f t(!? F".• a. Z d. 10i. p') 0 0 Li- 4 • ■ r . -�� _ Ir1.�,r 4.�I rG - r . N , 3,Fi ood S f Z!'bb! 1 • • i i 11110 c; co NI . 1 t z , 1 . 1 , . ,. � I � I. t 1 Il 0,, I RIJ gg��4 2`� W O6/ fy NV1 1 ., I } L1'r 4 _``� �� q 3, b$1 1 « r ter ' f I' ki .ct 03 { „, 'c., ,ra” �.. t ...,i`4.'"' ... ;,....,.»..wow..v.�.�..-..,—,�.yns.N �.y l.'a.�.. �..,......�.;.., ..i ,.�-. .. ....,. .�.._ .. ., -.,r,�„ .i • - .. - _ •^' 2 Q 1 rr) _. to t'■! , Qz (.r) .r 9 (f) s f)¢i O J .r. m. n 41°, O Q• OQ SD D T P.. U At OP 1, 1 j ■ • `'..'' I i' (] y 0� . , an 7/4 , ,,, H sir Q ; "'111 �[�i/ . • a_ 4:;) a f • , Q _ n -- - _ _- _ - - - \_ t!J -£1t I 7 if -----'4`; .. - ' '7" / / I -= • (`1= 921.90 iff •i''• C) (901.06} 262.06 235.3a w0.3.TG - / N 89°40 E - 16 a ...,' 600 `r0 5:/0 AC /.5v AC it 3.89 AC. t� • A } c 1 / // i s s' - 8g°q0`1 E .• / *A- cn N r� ( � _ -_ ~' �S 20,3651 p , i so, - --_ k . 8r 0 N&�0 4st r,.y Tg, - / ■.- 'io - - _:. i 4,,,1_71/ P.. a > . a • #-I5.6t 82,�,� S'89° / S2` ` Iff.f i c°,� 6 - i=1s5:� k Q . . ° 2 I 3 r f 43 3 `' COMMON 4 ' ts, r�. Zr fc Q 6,,A t AREA 263.1E _ S �4 Z2SJ_ h u S$94 52�7 W_ ., ~7 V# A o �R �� t l3�3 N�g99 35 SCE` X433' —....k. G Nf R` 46 4, 17.00 CHS. (CR_429-40` WIDTH ) en 7 BEG. GFi.•421 f4=tX3I�_ � sir-., - - , )` SEE MAP SEE MAP ii, 2S 9 15A of ,--- - _ - _ - - - - - - _ —-----^ - - - - - _- - - - - - _ I - a L - L - e • _ _ _ _ _--__ - _ ._ _• - - __ - _ - _ --- - f - - - - _ - - ,: • _ - WASHINGTON COUNTY OR EC SEE MAP �i Car. r .. 2S 1 1ODC SCALE I : 200' - SECIN t. . 425: : SAY.. ,,r . 9 DLL H ROAD 1 - n . 67-3.l:4O5 5w E �� 90-43302 _ - _ - - - - - .` _ -s..,, - 403 - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - _ it4 try ---_, �� "- - - - - - - --_ . 3101 - . f7P54 x.. a 'I7Oa. I 1 437Ac_ : 73.29 1 1 k en ! D r- LL,., 25 i... n in M: -- i vi - - - + — , w:. M 814 = • 5.79 Ac. 23_74 , ,.. , .., ,...• ::_, _ _ ... 2S I MBA 1 in 11 02 4 - g 1 .lsAc 0 S 2 0�1_ I 496.04 ..c •7 ° -a— i --31-oO- 2o'EASEMENT - • . - a •- l - ;nFBArAi:. 629:86 1V =90 4.71 _1-801—_ , - 280 -_' �•8O !.®104. 6941 :9.96_ ;, - 1.98At. ..6'P As. o n 2.53 AC. - Ni. _ � _ r o ' - $89a 42I-E. ° lc sSo ._ , i,','-5 - = - li:'''-' . 2-83.21 z �'ap I 1#$ - ,* 100 • — ; — — _ .c,, see CS 1073 3a I 389: L , •81 t 2378 ! ° .12 to., . I___ 3 9 220 f - -=- Lai: „ --_ 4$Ta? imr. A `?'�i s it/6 t' _ 42702 ,, $ :;-s egA<. - 7057-O4. c..35Ac. i 2 _ � O l.�63As: _ �. _ 116AC. 2.14=Ac az - 1 ° 150.0 (CS- No.131391 n . 20 .- + Lt-, 2 2 _ ifs g 6018• , sOn 2200- 7T o 32,F s r :.v' 4160ile. rf1 2.5 `0 I '�-sT � 4� . Ff.e5 At- r r s _ 1e, • • • . 1.1- ,67.8.'- _ -- . °I 2200 S 77° 3Ve - y� �0I 4.6a4ie. i f� ppi� •19 I co SEE MAP E MA _ 2S 11.5BD t w!'. 155 595.i. f ►2301 2..85'27'we • , .-_ -:.•_ .96 Ac. f_ tC s No i�84ij .eiAe. 2305 m ' 'JI lo _= a l0 1.60 sic. z tv I' i(t 1 $ -- _ -- - - --- - - - - — - - - '_•_.s 850 2' E • 17ffi t _ f 5 '' 13 < �� V -Z 2400 K 85¢ 7 §. ey J. 4c. ., - I � J.Te Ac 2 3Q4 `t .II 11 .T6.4 c. �� 10'76 p' �� I Se50 I i� 2,`F r i W 2303 1 1.28 Ac. - 140' • Z $6 A C o al i s1 _ 311►'27cIs- p �� CENTER OF 1 . R , 1,, 4.g.-,--- • SECTION t - �taR _ 1` �� t‘► SEE MAP SEE MAP 1 2S 1-5C . d."7-f 2 S i i 5 D t. • 4 A , , ' _ 0 • .' ,. .. w ..i-�._ ,.lr.,., .....+-.� em yVw��ll.1�.«.w,».J 54.::,.,..i«L,,..],,...,,,,.,la.-...,.,,..,:„.4.„,.,x..�..s.,,,--, ....... ,,,,::.'.t.,:.;..•«+u«.i.,«;.J,4,... r.-.1�4,..whwrh4 l.dt.'.,..-.I.:...nhA"....4..r_n.+.1N-.P•xr.6.�-w..;;,,':',{ / 842.40 a i2JT GHS. ��' ``"" S 89°48: W • • �J SEE MAP, ��" / 3017 ,�', " as i 10C 0 4.94 AO. a N • r ' v t • .1 521.90 a (901,P6.)', �5.. 262,Q6 235.30 i ,,,,�00 X00 I�77 ^^/� .�V 11V 9Ac t.' ± m S ' 2p N • ti � ' . N 03°4014 °E � C. co ,,, " , d ••/ i:J si �� I 6 7 r, • • � • • T O 0f P� M N • ( el '�'2�.�� i � , ��BQ�� •� -15.'61 4 S 89°52i T��W .�;r, lii.i9 cy�� `hro I. ti ' 'MAC A �' 0R 2 � i3 o. �'� N nO°5i'T„ l. s 88°52i "YV 4 R 14,-. 13'a---- �IG.�+ .46 t�:�Q cHS. C 1 ( 6,6G. (7 R,423' I/4 otIR. 6Qs/i3'w-,w .to • VAGA`t'Eb R 90 ?5 23 ,.. , - o.1, ... ItlI h ' . : ,: . . . ' . , . : : . : � ' �S I i5BA1/ � .. / S ,. ., ,...w, a,a�,..%,,.>r�s ,,..�_..f..,..... ..... ��ra.,:�.1.%1.-�,u•.,,, .w.»..:�....,.,_._.,e,.,.... 4•..,.;1..«.r.r,.,� �........ar«-� .u�+;,a..,w.rwu' ),. 8 ?..40 to ...s y! 12.:77 CMS. `' ►• S 09°48' W m.144• , I r° N 9D._ ,...„ 0,. . 0„,.. z. %.,... ,,...._____, „ ... z, D c PH ASE" 2) ...'1 Si i 1 1000 .5 , � PHASE-I ) ., /9��2,y1.9008 1 . •-...., D l ` 340 . Q f F fie. 1348 3:B 9 .QC `� a tP ZA\ I +' °6 �3 'r I 01x r` oo OAc. 8 v' I �:8 I I to 4.-*(0 4#�O wa o O 0 Bi ♦' } �� ,�, '�4 tv ^•�+ N 79T,3,∎�it I 1 i I , I i I i (5.81 a > ' 492, �t sIJ,}` i 185,54 1 ,136 k R. 0 I .. 19 I 'a AREA 26;3.I 0 d rr �I b i S 09 s52 7 W J OO-436I I i I I CR Off:.425-4q WIDTH .d D DURHAM I I ot 1 ^ 1 N om• f • r .rL I . t 2s 1 0 ,�41y • ,� �. ., ,..�.,,.,. .: _. 1,.+..,-,: ,,.,..,,,_.......«_..,_,.,._.,...W....d... .. _,......,.,._..._,..-u i..._.... - ..�... r: ,.�.w.�w,.�,,..,...:,. _....,.^ _ „-..,._,,.r.:.u_^„rx•+..a:.i.t—.w�7.�.n«.,..:wc:-.,'!.-.:..>:�.:�..:wJY�'w«,.'t„4'.-+-.•.'r.+::a,�:uw:w'...�....Mn......_.,, - • I ••Ir ,+(?.l'' .10Lltirkl=lN:+M.Ip1.”aMIwMrY+r'rn++.',w..," '-;`uT.+{,rpM'+"w..Vl'l'«..perk•.Y.:..�n'°Y�rnf'.M'.wwu'ik1r:1W «rw'M++..e { r.♦_ nMYhu1.Y MMrIM I✓hv1'}?1.0 t+rHYwltlf9YW+ 4!WttFr r+p - I t �f,w„w f �+ww'vw:ar-,n..Y.�...rr«"w..«w�....r.' '''':iW3J%'WH'�M Ye • I rii, II' • cP -r Nt4 O 1° N'IF\ Yis! d R•VL'w w,+r t"ol W f ^. p,>b F r PIP)4 1� H..�rN A '7�i,wr k1N i(o e.�7 Y+' Y Mvr�r I t,YO w axfwF ip �""� ( ik�"' 0�' Na 9��Cw7W {: ,� �Y �w»i�,��tF�4'.10, Y r y g i i.e 44 } y� pf� '6 ,� 140i,,U°NN""' ; 4a z1 { •.t`'�k 1'�yj,ACp'iV1r�y+'' '1 "K' 9Y l+fY.�1.' Ir, �{�'1i' C�,gwy 1'.'a�'YYS `1'eGr..Ixµ'6y,Yy�1{1�/�X 1 Wf.`.;) y�IY(t 1t.i _ 'f1 8_"i aw} )i 'Xt"�i,' M{�r F' p�N R - 1},:;677'0)17,1 ; [..' . 1,117,)YU.{JFIf�'111 -.Y'Y �I'N1:6��"IIrY �� I '��' �. uj��}}t{Jy'yq,"R� vJ 'h�,11 y]�G{J,.,' 'nl {7 dY i, r�'/'fly[ �jJ'�Y) �'( '��A'rl L Iv� 0.t �'� YI M.�w,Y'�',++'a�Y' p,FT� p(. `1°1,..f .1 1 C',Hq a5� �� 1 Y ,I I' #. t;.� "', , "" r �" t1�Yt'Ai"�" 't t Y t,►d"�t Y:R' `.� °�.J '"k �"'.F a `N "�"�� ('+,91t" C'tiviC"diNN''" P 4 X O . r rtan akkiuso{:.tukoun,.1, .,4 wupn.4Yro i.,r.w.NWYY ai.sX pbAM,f+:ryft.,1:4,44i0V*4k'hl fM{,7,1.44 4J H.?.[M[v01va11 NY1+NFe,kN.IMlffµNM p yG..M+M,J T'ufi,yfp nor,p.Wv pyY„kW.IKM W' �{. t t"'f"ct. ) 41.)1 • { {tAl',t Ui�<� 1• I Ii1;1 1{,;R1\\ 1-"AR'L NS F./ ' 4v}6 : f Illr . _ ww..sw Yh.wpu,I,nwu.M arbnwrlY.'.++v.,is w�i .'_. �..,,,.:M.n.nr+�:.-.�...,._ +. ...• " 4uu:x+�.pw:�.ww.....,.ui44w.ra.uu.pa.s w wY'F.M Mrw+e•%4.iuir Y+uS+W a.».... uM r r O 1. • „1'µ r:•++.a...wqY.r...+w.4.'.i.+w.+..a+.w.uYWH iwwre+W+„Y+re4 avu„ILn,...uin,a.,..—«rl...ny.,ew,.+r«r N �.i r: I 5'l�k ^ e r I I � J • • ^ .y ..•�, . ..... x:..• «...�.,.,.,„F.,..+'A..d,.„_..,.....».....y,.•l,....,....�:.�...,....»a.,. ..+wn.r.,.«.- ..:'JI..:.La,k, l;;N r, r,w.w.,.,...i',.a......._..,...,I�✓'.»-....,.«:...,:.r.�t(.=.,=......,.—.......,....'.....�,.,«`•,-,.4:.i.. c,..:+.�..yw,.:1.:A.n_.a�•.a»;:.Alt'.:.w..',:t..-..a.a...+:.:,,:::.•.i.aW.1.,w-1I::uin.,,,a ,....•., 1 1 , F; t • ;; _I Y ;ti �M•in �i • kgs0 iit4otiL 50((-(e I,r`. • iiy t •, 4" 251,10DC-0.400 I a99ASSCIA .1'4 I MI TED PARTNERSIIIP � 1.., I BY CARL C ' li i1 s j',"^4ii!«Lirt,0. g r} l.,,tv.1.,w 1,.i.uu 9 M i la;"4C�i liµ.*R i .;,.1. •1,A:i :1„,,,,,,,IF e/"W ,,,t3l G t !d Wik'r Ft SII1Yf �;;4:1;'at:" i Ft,,,,C�.i)),srt,4t.,y( 'rx i.,,'.,:!e ,tr,i` E' " j' ,, NkW YCRK CITY . M' .� w p 1,!,:l'1,:) • * 7 � 1 f E y .IF1. `I4l 4\' 1.xJ " , 2� .►RStltlltl! Il 1•1.1111 ti:III#1 ill/1if,:4,tt.e1001 .111''t ' f.,1∎I11041.4i' ,r , • j o • e I r ■ • . 1. ■ N • � n 1 .i1.,4-4,-+..-,4-44,4ry...eM,,..«-.,4 i .w 14..4 41x... 1.., .,..,.4$.•ru.,..... r:.,..,«:.w,.. 4.d,.«, .444w,.........r.•,-A44.r 4...a...,•-,........,u.-.:-.:1ks4 N., . .+.,a...._._ 'MW„.. �,,.w.-:�.H.�«.,�«a.J...ar'�.,.Hr«u..-,...,,+-....>.�;.,s+.w,.-.,a7«.G:i»:..o-�t...w,,..sr:-„,w:.,m.-.-,uw...«e•.;:.F,.,..,..ux .». c 4,, ( n 4 i i CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO Sue Caacver, NPO 6 Chairperson FROM: J Offer, Development Review Planner . DATE: November 27, 1991 SUBJECT: Westwood Development Co. Application SDR 91-14 Thank you for getting the NPO's comments on the Westwood Development Co. Site Development Review application for Tigard Towne Square to me so quickly. The Planning Division has considered these comments but is unable to agree with the NPO that .` a new or revised traffic study should be required as a condition of approval of this development application. ' The earlier Site Development Review application for the Tigard Towne Square shopping center (SDR 87--05) was found to be consistent with Community Development Code requirements for access and necessary road improvements conditioned upon certain road improvements being provided by the developer. Those improvements have been completed. The current proposal is essentially the same as the final phase of the 1987 proposal, and in fact involves slightly less commercial square footage. We therefore find the ' . current proposal to also be consistent with the access and road improvement findings of SDI . 87--05. ` ' .4 Sinc e t he cur rent application essentially seeks renewal of the approval of a portion of an earlier approval that included 1, consideration of a traffic study and which resulted in significant road improvements, staff believes that , a new or revised traffic 1' study would be only a paper exercise that would not result in any road improvements beyond p, d r y ' additional what was previously required. Such an exercise would only consume the developers and City , Y staff'. and e . would 'o delay in the .staff's time an vua n We see result in a dela i energies and only construction of this development W' public benefit in requiring 19 ' approval or revised ised traffic study; therefore, the November n . �?P . 14, a SDR 91-14 will stand without an amended 'I . decision being rendered. c: Files SDR W, -14 and SDR 87-05 Ferry Foy, Westwood Development �. i i � 1 •1 • • ....u.,....,i. ;.,.nv,.w.,»w,.,,.a1;4rr...v....U.n+ r.wca:..,3w,.,.�Lulan.t....,..t,:..:t,+.Ga..-».ut.a.......t;;.:.,a...;-.0 ..ia......,:. „w,...r..•:... ,....,=...uw,,.o::..+,.'...,....w.l..,;w,.,r:«n«aa.+,. ......,-..tyw.•:u1,4k.......w.... atid�i:. 4..u.:w.w„a..+«....w�l...w-. (d REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO: Q DATE: fNovember 14, 19 9 i FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 91-OO1ae F©Y/WESTWOOD (NrPO #6) A request for Site Development Review approval to develop an approximately 46,192 square foot general retail store and related parking facilities at the Tigard Towne Square shopping center. ZONE: C-G (General Commercial). ` The C-G zoning allows public agency administrative services, public . support facilities, professional and administrative services, general retail sales, financial, insurance, real estate services, business support services, and single-family residential units among other. uses. LOCATION: 16200 SW Pacific highway (WCTM 2S1 15BA, tax lot 101) APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Section 18.120. Attached is the Site Plan, applicant's statement, and Notice of Decision for your review. If you wish to comment on this application, or appeal this decision, we need your comments by .Dec. 4, 1931. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above d ite, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm'your comments 'in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. a STAFF CONTACT: e rTrrr Offer PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: • _._._ We have reviewed the•proposal. and have no objections to it. Plea,,e contact � of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: • Name of Per son 'Commenting: x " ,tea Ph3qone Number:Number: C '� • bkM SDR9 1-l4 I I I i } �ir NPO #6 Minutes from November 200 1991 After attending a joint meeting for a staff presentation and discussion on tax bills and an update on the western bypass with NPO 5 and CPO 4 at the ' Tigard Water District, NPO members adjourned to City Hall and the meeting was called to order at 8:54 pm. Those members in attendance were: Carver, Clinton, Davenport, Dillin, Kasson, Mitchell, Pasteris, Watson, Wilson and Sellers. Excused: Crow The minutes from the October 16 meeting were approved as written. SUB 91-0015 - KEITH AND JEAN TAYLOR Applicant requested a Subdivision approval to divide approx. 2.09 acres into nine lots on a parcel of land between SW 97th on the west and SW VieW , Terrace on the east. The NPO made a motion to oppose the plan as presented for the following reasons: MeMbers have serious concerns about a) the dimensional requirements being satisfied for lots 4 and 9; b) the waving of the solar requirements; and c) the accessibility of the private drive and continued use of private drives in this area. Members feel the best plan would ba to develop the whole area (which includes undeveloped lots to the north and south) as one coordinated neighborhood which in turn would help facilitate proper street alignment. The motion was unanimous. (Stephanie and/or Phil agreed to attend the . hearing to make the NPO's presentation. ) •SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 91-0014 FOX/WESTWOOD Applicant requested approval to develop a 46,192 square foot general retail store and related parking facilities at Tigard Towne Square. Y- The NPO made the following motion: Approval of this request is contingent on Westwood providing an updated , traffic analysis and verification against projections made by the original traffic study used in the original development. If significant deviationS from the original traffic study are detected the NPO request a plan to mitigate these effeCts. The motion was unanimous, VgIAD UPDATE: Ross Woods presented a draft of their Road IbprOvement Agreement that will be presented to City Council, This Agreement does Satisfy the Pb concerns as addressed in our Appeal. After much - diOCuSsion, NPO members agreed to have the Appeal Committee use their best judgment to handle this matter at the hearing tentatively scheduled for December 10. . .‘ The Meetimg adjourned at 10254 11, !it r • i AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON County of Washington ) ss. • City of Tigard ? v LI, c . (iivo fU(1,--•- .., being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say: (Please print) ,p- �[ That I am a r'- C lc A'5y j f for The City of Tigard, Oregon. That I served NOTICE, OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: That I served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: f. 'c//',City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Planning Commission Tigard Hearings Officer _�_� Tigard City Council . , ' A copy (Public Hearing Notice/Notice of Decision) of which is attached (Marked Exhibit "A") was mailed to each named persons at the addres shown on the attached list marked exhibit "B" on the S ' day of �)[ \�'�l E!"+ 19 c , said notice NOTICE OF DECISION as her-to attached, was posted or an appropriate . ' • bulletin board on the J day of k PI 1 ,•" , 19*9 t ; and deposited •, in the United States Mail on the _L -k'V, day of 140 , 19._1___,,,, postage prepaid. • Prepared Notice Posted (For Decision Only) 1 .I4',',1',)"1`1��"k,..''yS opead}k pbed and sworn/affirm to me on the ,/r � `:W'day of ,' , F`, '.1U !� 4 J 1 � .1',rc,a r' c ..n • myr b Ayn+*e�y,�Z1r.pt«`4!/'�+ 11::5".":14111'1'r A „ m 1 r' r' r^�A�A f t * 117.. J to .ww sr?t,,,,,„ ',F,t �i.`M � n;„�j a �.,,,,� r-',.' a"� NOTARY PURL. *F OREGON ,,,!'r..-//0/ * `� any. F,, `., q',.to.)r,.,,, M Commission Ele Tres: kn. , ,,"'n.„ w� ) ,'w e r y p Y Person, w . delivered to 'POST OFFICE ^�... Sub ribed and sworn/affirm to me on the day of �/ ,� , .9 � ;I p I . 4 ` ')T -Y ,. PU I OF OREGON ,r ,, My ommiesion Expires: Xr. / "'1 „ a bkm/Ak'FIDAV;k3KM • AR, 64 ..1 t...,-..V..w.,.w..._.. _•. .. ,,._ . _.,,•...:.., ,•..._ •. ., .-, .....,-.».,,.•.....«..+,. .....,.,.......:............,..+...,......-,,..»......,..,,.._...-,......:.la.....-......,._..,.•_...,.•...».....,r.c»-..... ..su..-...,.;n ,c...,,......«..r--«..,...a:.., ....,.-a»,,.:-.Mk..::..:.w,.,w.n.:.,..ti ».,.+..4w _,.._. CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SIR. 91-0014 WESTWOOD CORPORATION APPLICATION: A request by Westwood Corporation for Site Development Review approval to develop a 46,192 square foot home improvement store and a 2 550' square foot general retail store and p � g associated parking facilities at the Tigard Towne Square shopping center. These buildings and parking were planned and approved as !' part of the original Site Development Review a pp roval for the shopping center but that approval has since expired. Zoning �;, designation: C-G (General Commercial) . Location: 16200 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 251 15BA, Tax Lot 101) . DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director's designee for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on r' p. • which the decision is based are noted below: A. FINDINGS OF FACT . 1. Proposal Description The Community Development Director approved, Site Development Review. SDR 87®-05 for development of the Tigard Towne Square shopping center on May 6, 1987. The approved proposal included all of the buildings that have ' since been constricted on the site as well as an 80,000 ' r square foot retail major anchor store on the southern 1�. portion of the site, retail sales area in the area of the currently proposed 2,550 square foot space, and a freestanding pad in the southwestern corner of the site adjacent to the Key Bank building. The approval was granted for a one year, period. Implicit in the approval of a multi-tenant, multi-pad shopping center is approval of a phased development plan. � • - .Ho wever, Co de Section ec ti on 8 12 0.050.A provides that :;ot al t ime for development of all phases is three years witho ut re a pp l yir7 for Site Development Review approval. Therefore, the ph ased development approval f or completion of the Tigard Town Square shopping center has expired. The current application seeks to renew that approval. The applicants, Westwood Corporation, request ' Site �. • Development Review approval to develop a 46,192 square foot home improvement y ,5 5 0 square foot a irn rovement store and a 2,550 •associated etail ex�,} ing southward from the general r store ��nd .� .. facilities at shoping cnter. . These bu ldinhs Tigard d parking�gwere shopping g planned and approved as part of the original Site } ~.,..,., ,. .,,.. .,, .._._...............»,,.,...ik.;...,r.f, n..,_....-_....,.._,........_...._...,,._w,,.....,.............. ...........",�0+.,..., ........rw.:....«._...n...4r,..a,a,.»..._..z..ti. .«;+, _.it..,:'.,.... .s.. ,1 d».•.»...::„,;,m.,„».,, f Development Review approval,pproval, ex cept that the building t footprint of the home improvement store has been reduced from the previously proposed 80,000 square feet. The former proposed foot balance of the p p footprint would include a nursery area in the southwestern corner of the store and a lumber storage area in the southeastern corner. The • loading and delivery area would be on the east side of a the site, as was approved in 1987 . Completion of the parking area w ould add 87 additional parking spaces, including 3 handicapped spaces. Utilities, storm drainage, fencing, and landscaping along the boundaries of the site are already in place consistent with the approved plans for SDI. 87-05. 3. Agency Comments The Building Division and the Engineering Department have reviewed the proposal and have offered no comments or objections. Because full utilities and services have already been provided to this portion of the site along with development of the remainder of the shopping center, other utility and service providing agencies were not . Y notified of the current development proposal. N?O 06 has been notified of the proposal. The NPO will have the opportunity to review the proposal at the November 20, 19 91 meeting and will be able to request an 4 amended decision to address any significant concerns, if such 'concerns arise. ,a t The City of King City has also been provided with notice 'A of the proposed renewal of the phasing plan with the �. current ro p osal. p P B. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION The proposed completion of the shopping center consistent with the app. complies Community � t un w�, earlier ie�` xoual o with omm Development Code C-G zoning district requirements for a b minimum setbacks from property boundaries, maximum building height, maximum site coverage (8.5 percent maximum coverage allowed) minimum site landscaping percent minimum landscaping required) .' Yandscap.� g um co g ed� anti mina, `'fie � g q � center. , ( 15 pe n re uired . The intended. usage of the anchor building as a home improvement is consistent permitted uses in . awstent with the the C�C= pane Tenant nodi i ication permits necessary sary for , the 2,550 square foot spate betwe en t his new anchor and t he existing building, as well as on the p ad south of ee Bank will be reviewed to assure that future of these areas will be consistent with t permitted u ses of the / .` zone f. NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR WOOb INC n gi-an�:� w�� • • .,,...u...,...-....-,w_._..»..,.,.-,..... .....s_. -, ..,._ a,_...d,.,..»,.a..;.au... ..t.:... ...4-w.:t F..wt.,m....» .«:ll:. 1....«i.,.X41..:..........�,.-+..,....-.-.,F,._........,+.......i..1hL'..w,u,:ya«.u.J:,,.;u..,_.•.N;7 d;M.,+n.a.. .::+H, .:t1:.«.«,...,...i:-w'.:.:«.::-:.....,a_L:r.,«r.+.Kw:u.W The entire shopping center development complies with Community Development Code Chapter 18.100 requirements for parking area trees and landscaping, street trees, f fenv:ing, buffering, and other site landscaping requirements. ' In addition, the total development, with the proposed additional parking spaces, is consistent with Code Chapter 1$. 106 standards related to required parking spaces for the mix of existing and proposed uses, designated handicapped parking spaces, minimum parking lot aisleway widths, and lighting. Existing accesses to the site are consistent with the access standards of Code Cha9ter 18.108. No additional traffic impacts are anticipated at this time as compared 1.:o what was anticipated at the time of the earlier approval. Additional street improvements constructed to mitigate anticipated traffic impacts are therefore not warranted as a condition of this approval. No additional freestanding signs are proposed at this time. Any additional signage will need to be approved through the sign permi t process. ,. n C. DECISION 4 The Director's designee approves Site Development Review SDR 91-0014 subject to the following conditions: BUILDING PERMITS WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING CONDITION IS SATISFIED. 1. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the building permit application. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Control Plans m- Technical Guidance Handbook, November 1989 . " UNLESS A SATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE ASSURANCE IS POSTED, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ' SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF AN OCCUPANCY, PERMIT: 2. The proposed landscaping materials and other proposed site improvements shall be installed in conformance with '� the approved sit e plan. STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Offer, Planning DlwlsaOn. r THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID IP EXERCISED WITHIN EIGH F FINAL . T ED BELOW. MONTHS NOTED�lON OF THE DATE C� NOTICE DOr ECISION..,. IaE S ION - SDR 91-0014 0 i4 . 3 �- - WESTW4�Ol� INC. • e r r ,. _ _ .rai.+.0.0.... _...r..-,....., ..xau«r.»r...,.v...1.-,.,.w,.-`.r ..u4,,+,«.,.,x,•--,.1...1.«+uw.-,,....d a......wr<Grv..«,t+..aw « Y �4.a r.r.«.s:wlw..«:JP{''u r:'r:.r+J'A' >w-«t• D. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, is posted at City Hall and mailed to: ' . ),/„r The a lic=ant and owners rl, Pp X Owners Of record within the required distance xThe effected Neighborhood. Planning Organization Affected government agencies s ; 2. Final Decision: THIS DECISION SHALL BE FINAL UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED OR SUBSTANTIAL REASONS FOR. ISSUING AN AMENDED DECISION ARE FORWARDED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION NO LATER THAN 3:30 P.M. ON +: ' DECEMBER 4, 1991 ,1 ,. 3. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and ,_,/ )' Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Cade a • which provides that a written appeal must hie filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. Appeal fee schedule and forms are available at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon. 4. Questions 1'€ you have questions, please call Jerry . Offer, City of Tigard Planning Department, City of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hal 1 Blvd. , Tigard, L, Oregon. : 'DATE 4 N N wer'sd APPRO ck Be Senior Planner ao/westwood.sdr •c I Ili { ' NOTICE 3� DECISION - SDR 91-0014 W STWOOD INC I ro f n ' • «.,.,RLA.44,14 4_�.i...«,.,._,,....,,,,.,..L.... ...,...,w-.,.....+..-......--w:.......rw.•:.:,.,..,._4...,...x:4.,,,.0 Ar....m,...:......∎41 .J-4!.•.,4,4^∎••,,.,:.,- ,..,,.._.,,«4∎•∎,;•..:_,,...:.:,,...w.:.1..+-„4,..Mdi.«7.-u 4.10.,«.u...,a,,440...4,,.t u..i»,.«.w�:,.._..,x«,!>n.o. ....._j.v.w.,...n,.. ,«,_.. :-... _ • . i e rt. .— ...10. 1 .. r, 'aen. , 1 , Y ro.... a to'q 0 C:, r ! . r' T"_�' `V ' , Jh R .r a,:O p 1_ye,...■ C4 M �n .. ' rs xr,d o.e•m r i Y""I a o kY ..:r . 0 Y _ O G a w ry ri ,A H a C d rt. q • w a L.,.,U to i ,v N yy u , .' .-.......'0 . t..,,0 7 4 . . . , c...., ,-.,..„.t, ,:„...., _ ._ ... . . .,.....,........ E ,..,. . . . ._ .... ,ti 1 . . . I 4:1 E-4 re; ./ ' ' . f / :11'4 ci is t. t.. . 0 , , , 1 , * • .=, , i 11 P 111011 ,, %Cc: : 1 10 ,: ., , , , ,, • 4, • ,,› , . , 1 ,..„.. . , T ' , p I• 1,,, ,o,,,, Ai, • •0 6 iw • 100' .., * I r 4 , -- c'] _ .w_ f p t • : , , �y w SINE III i 1 ' j; m I ' '• r,,,//,,,.,,/,/''(/:.,,te. ;1'.7 j ”" ordy-. ,zr,, 1 i„ i ' ✓.r' rr r 1,(, 7, I j 1 i � 0 � , r ;;r�/„ r ,! % /0✓' , . 1 , , , "`? i,� , r#"1,4: i p"1� . f . . . , , 1 1 1 • 1 ''-' ''-,- 04,4::' ' '/::,,i/p..,;:ip,.,,,,;1,:;,74,,,,,,,,o ,• , 1, • i i j W . C K f' I I FF, . . . , ,, , � ,,,. ,, , ,t,,df, ,,,.. 4,,,,,,,," ,,, ,, i. ,..,,,, . . , , aim .0,1_1.. 111.1.........--.. _ 11 :, • ,; � mnuWtw .. .xmwexnriiar,�mN ,�,�►� -�.,: �t'a _ ,aorwsn ;, • t ..• e �, .......... ... ......... .... .. ....,..... ,,... :.... ,. a.,... ..,, : • .,.: .:,.,i� ..:.: . , I:.. .. �... .,. .,..... ..:.. ,tor .... j ' ,• ..a.-..,+..u„so x...—«., ..,s 1,1. w.. »„ • ..., n.+wmb..,N:',..w,+:..c...,.M..«. ....r.,.,.:'...:....t.,.ac.•—:cuxw Jw»usuC+Swt.tw..,e-ur...... �p . ... ...,....« _<.,tv..,..,«,.e '!wa,..•.a..w..».aewN.v.r,r..«.,w..rw.., „o.,.._ .... d�1✓ wJ i A wd v a• . ni v A PORTLAND,: OR 97221 4` .:��`, 2s115A0--01700 2S115A0-02700 , . :� BISHOP,. LAVERNE — ESTATE OF STEVENS, LARRY D/.JULIE F ' ' . 100E BALBOA AVE 16425 SW 113TH TIGARD OR, 97224 k3URLIN�:AMF CA 94010 , m 2S115A0-02703 2S115A0-02704 4.. .... . • MOFFAT, NORMAN R FOSTER, ROBERT B AND I,' KATHERINE E ,PATRICIA ANN. 16445 SW 113TH AVE 16565 SW 113TH , TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 • 2S'115A0-02705 w• . 2S115A0-02801 '' BRAND-BROADWAY ASSOCIATES CRAIG, JAMES N AND VICKI J. EARN!), NORTON S . I 6325 SW 113T AVE . 16255 VENTURA BLVD SUITE 1200 TIGARD • OR 97224 ENCINO CA 91436 ' ' , I ,' 2811,5A0--02803 • ..•..d.•. ••.•.•. • • . . ' ' ' 2S115A0--03100 •..... . .• .•. .• •••e••. MUIR, HOBERT H WESTWOOD CORPORATION, 16285 SW 113TH DEVELOPERS • NTRACTORS TIGARD OR 97223 3030 SW Y ▪ AVE a PORTLpe OR 97201 ,T 2S115BA-00102 w.d••w. . 25115BA-00103 ,N . ] •, • WESTWOOD HOLDING CORD WESTWOOD HOLDING CORP 3030 SW MOODY ,7 3030 SW MOOD PORTLAND I OR 97)01 ' ' PORTLAND OR 97201 ". •' 2S1101)0,.00400]0400 ... .. w,. 0: » ••' 2S110DC-00500 .• i 0 w • DURHAM / 99 ASSOCIATES ' ' LUTON, ROBERT C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP BY TUALATIN DEVELOPMENT CO ' BY CARL MARK'S REALTY SERV. , PO BOX' 8041 . 77 WATER STREET BLACK BUTTE RCA OR 91759 0 NEW YORK CITY NY 10005 ' . v 2S110DC--01300 Y..iO.O.• •.i•.. o..C • . 2S110DC-00600 i.e,f••o•.,:.G.••.• .w.. • LUTON, ROBERT C , ' ' COAST FINANCE I , PO BOX 8041 11205 SW �SUM MELD D,R, '' BLACK BUTT CH OR ' 97759 TIGARD 'O 97224 . ' ` V . a . 25110DC-00 700 2 8110DC-0 0800 w y .•..d , i A COAST FINANCE INC FARWEST ASSOC SUiRFIELD ; , 11205 SW SUMMERFIELD' DR TANOLEWOOD ASSOCIATES TIG OA 97224 C r A SSO C 1ATES 400 S W SI XTI A V , 110C ;, . PORTLAND OR 9/204 SUD GAEtVEI GERALD O ' 10�55 SW HOODVIEW DR 3030 S[ MOODY ' GAD oR 972 PORTL,A1O, O .91212 { w880 0oD COP.P0LTIO f ,` 3030 84 t1ooD , w .PORTLAND oR 721z `� , . , • I' } AK C1 , r 4 1 REQUEST FOR 'COMMENTS TO: �� ` DATE: November• 14. 1991 FROM: Tigard Planning Department • RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 91-0014 - FOY/WESTWOOD (NPO #6) A request for Site Development Review approval to develop an approximately 46,192 square foot general retail store and related parking facilities at the n `Tigard Towne Square shopping center. ZONE:. C-G (General Commercial?- ,,f The C-G zoning allows public agency administrative services, public f support facilities, professional and administrative services, general retail sales, financial, insurance, real estate services, business support services, and single-family.residential units among other uses. LOCATION ' 16200 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 2S1 15BA, tax lot 101) APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Section 18.120. • Attached is the Site Plan,, applicant's statement, and Notioe of Decision for your review. If you wish to comment on this application, or appeal this decision, we need your comments by Dec. 4, 1991. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. 7C_f you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box °\ . 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. \\. STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Offer PLEASE CHECIC THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal :end have no objections to it. Please contact _._._ of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: �} . k? • w�wwr .,'��I•�.wirw4•wil� A Dame of Person Commenting: _�. fl. • 3. Phone Number: �� M bkm/SNR91.14.B P , ft I i • • I _ { n - 1 A v' aw.». ............. .r ._ .. ... .,_...,.....«*.„.a,.,..aO�Yll�ll ul,...u;.a_.4du':w...a x�,.,w....:� «.:--..u.:;:...i.a,,.w...w.�-._�w.._,...w,..,•a,...,, W REQUEST FOR COMMENTS r TO DATE: November 14, 1991 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 91-0014 FOY/WESTWOOD (NPO #6) A request for Site Development Review approval to develop an appro,Kimately 46,192 square foot general retail store and related parking facilities at the Tigard Towne Square shopping center. ZONE: C-G (General Commercial). ". The C-G zoning allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, general '. retail sales, financial, insurance, real estate services, busineAs sepport serwviOes, and single-family residential units among other uses. LOCATION: 16200 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 251 15BA, tax lot 101) APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Section 18.120. Attached is the Site Plan, applicant's statement, and ''Notice of Decision for your review. If you wish to comment on this application, or appeal this decision, we need your comments by Dec. 4, 1991. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to reeRpnd _? by the above datgL, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any , questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Jerry_Offer PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: ' We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: • Name of Person Commenting: � A,.r 6 e , Phone Number: k 1 • bkm/8DR91-14.13KI uT ... - f , � � ''� �..�.a.,.w...,w...w�.w,.'..:,.�......a...,.�.....a 44 a • • f" i d fir, i,;.. , 'l'r r ' •' , . L.. . .. .. . • .. . . . . ,. . . .• r .:'. k.. . . .. . .. . ., . . .. ., , . . . .. ,. ,,, . . . . ,. . . ., ,, . . .. , . . . , . . ., . , . . .. . . ,. , ,. . . ., . fh. . . . . „„,,, ,,• . ,. . . . . . . . . ,.. ,,, . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . , . , .. . , ,, . .. . . . , . , , .. , , . .. . . . . i. . . . . . . • . . . . .. .',/ . r/• , . . . ,t . . . , . . , . . ,. . . , , .. . , , . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . , . . . '(...:',7,.---.), , z] . , . . , . ., . .. , . , . , . . . . . . . . . . . ,,,.,. • , . . , .. . . . •. . , . • . . , , , . . . . . ,,,,.. I. ,. , , ., ,. . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . , . . i".:, . , , . . . .. . , 1_,,, , . . ./. : ,,, . . . . . . . . . , I.,. . • . . . . . , C r . , , . , . . . . . „ . �r � i I i I t i r Ir• + j'• i l,. 1 wn w., ........... .. ._ ,..�. .,.., .i .. ..,,�. . 1 n 1 y �• ,f. , + ' ` . ...MEW i,... ,. P' , ` y, .. . •� + , , ., . ,• V • ' .. ''' CITY OF TfiGAREI UIFIEGE111 , ' C. OPIFIC itr I°N ' 1' . SITE DEVEI,OPIEIIJT REVIEW APPLICATION -. . ,' CITY OF TIGARD,, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 3397 ' Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 ' > FOR STAFF USE ONLY • r CASE AS NO I NO. /�I OTHER CASE ,NO S: 4- Y: ' RECEIPT NO. . APPLICATION ACCEPTED $Y: !. DATE: ,// -)- / 1 }, 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Application elements submitted: 4 I PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION) � s 1 .e./vc __1210„ Application form (1) ' , ' _104,li t ,;, �� t.' ,� �c CZ... !! .9 Vr B) Owner's sigriaturta/written ` , * 4,7, TAX MAP AND AX LOT NO, 2k �. 2 yt/ authorization 1 7 3/0/A 0 ( ) _ 1 \. . . , SIDE' SIZE 7-XXL.Dittoo x 3.'4,ale.; ° 3 1401.a.74 At, (n) 1, M1i PROPERTY OWNER./DEED HOLDER ..C.doc2... '. ,, war 0 1 ., ADDRESS 30, 62;t A,. iiilood PHONE w ,. . A 'c a n t' nt <° CITY _ ,,1 oe. "zip -97. 2./'2•__ ___.�. (pre-app checklist) APPLICANT* /'' (G) ADDRESS jilAtiptE 41 4.40 e,.,r_ PHONE -2,00 �,y\� ", CITY " ,^C" * ZIP )^ .:,►d 1. 1----"(t) Filing fee a, S.,/VC' ) . *When the owner and the applicant are different ._.,t; " (I) Construction Cost Estimate people, applicant :., „,�,;,,:r, �e the a n_ must be the purchaser of record °�+>'+r, possession with authorization MINED . hor or s. leasee itt ' assess th .written aut DATE DETER TO BE COMI''LETE. li " from the owner or an agent of the owner with written authorization. The owner(s) must sign this • applicatieri in the space provided on page two or PINAL' DECISION DEADLINE: submit a written authorization with this application. COMP. PLAN/ZONE DESIGNATION: "PROPOSAL>ROPOSAL SCARY T■le .owners of record of the subject property ' ::0L' „ ., request site review approval to N.P.O. Number: allow �� _ . e7 5,` ' c ... 1 Al' ApP r v• e d1 Date: deb --. 'w ; .,;+e ei r ter' Final Approval Date: • , ` Planning Engineering 0524P/11 • i I I I Rev d / 7 I I 4 3. List any variance, conditional use, sensitive lands, or other land use actions to be considered as part of this application: • • 4. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments •• described in the attached ,, inflor ratjon$ sheet at9 the time you submit this application. ; � • Y 4,/ r .y � • � • i, s' 5. THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property.B. If the application is granted,' the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is• found that any such statements are . false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. • DATED this " 1„4'- day of 40t�; 1g SIGNATURES of each owner (ego husband and wife) of the subject property. } •, • ' • w+ '•.r'�wwrww-'•rr.w�+.n.nw•r.w ., • 1 t R' 1I rj•�'�f^ A r rll Y f. .11. i• . 1 ,,,.. rY. n-• -. r r... 1 ..r1 . .,, k' 1 i 1 I' !a b tin �,a� N {• t � .. • •re • Aniummimmummummingimimmunammur gitrlaW 1, Subject: Tigard Towne Square (WE 'food Corp.), Durham Rd. & 99W Fla ,. To: DICK X-To: chria d, brad, viola, dick Date: 16 Oct 91 14:50:16 . For your i e format ion s Today Pat and I met with Jerry Foy of Westwood Corp. and two of hie a, . 'colleagues. They are proposing a building to complete the shopping center and wanted to find a way to escape the TIF Charge, since they paid SDC fees 1 . on the entire center in 1987 and also made substantial off-, ite improvements , in 1987. At that meeting, we suggested several things which may be of interest to you: 1. We encouraged them to go through a pre-app. for this bui l.ling to assure that there are no surpri., later. TIF, storm drainage fees, and new storm drainage regulations are ,:ms that are of potential concern. I offe ed to sit in on the pre-app, if desired, since .I am familiar with their past. SDR. 2. They propose to build 45,000 sq. ft. of building and 15,000 sq. ft. of display yard for lumber and nursery stock. I told them that the TIF would ' be based on only the 45,000 sq. ft. I talked to Tom Harry at Washington County and he confirmed this interpretation of TIF ordinance. 3. I told them that the TIF will be based on Category 823 (Shopping Center) �•� unles # they can show materials/lumber)p ts�that it sho y us otherwise. 'I They expect to show us should be .' classified under Category 812. (Building or Category 817 (Nursery) or come combination of the two, giving them a lower TIF. !' 4. We told them that we know of no way to grant them relief from TIF and no way to grant a TIF credit for the street improvements they completed in 1987. They thought Tim Ramis knew a way to grant Credits. Pat will explore 'this 'issue with xim. They did pay SDC on the full development elopment in 1987 and Pater reoeived an SDC rebate for their off- site improvements. • • { i '+, • .} •''� CITY OF TIGA.RD " PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES DATE: G( ei • APPLICANT: let,,ELS k �' AGENT 36451C181_,Q_PLOILQLLIF,:-P(___4ri),Y Phone: Phone ,2, PROPERTY LOCATION 1 - � .9'� J)�+i �t . ADDRESS: TAX MAP & TAX LOT • NECESSARY APPLICATION(S): �6TH d eAl I PROPOSAL .DESCRIPTION • COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: _�E • , �0VxNG D E S DESIGNATION: . P. NEIGHBORHOOD 'PLANNING ORGANIZATION 4A0 CHAIRPERSON: PRONE: '- ___._ ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS •.' ,� i Minimum lot size: $ . ft. ' Minimum lot width: 60., ft• �+ , Setbacks: front- C.) ft. side- O ft., rear- .� ft. ' garage- ft corner-,_ _ ft. from both streets.a , , s Maximum covers e: : % I r Mini1um landscaped or natural vegetation area: DS Maximum building '!height: ;,i ft. ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS .� Minimum lot frontage: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15 foot wide access ' easement. a io of 2.5 to 1. width Maximum lot depth��to 'vr�.d � ,. SPECIAL SETBACKS 'i; Streets: �) ft. from centerline of '-'4 )A-C.. ..117:1,C-LC- , 8stablished areas: ---ft. from "" T,.-;w�a "JAW" lir•. '_ Lower intensity zones: ft., along the site's ,eer,A,u. boundary ! ' Flag lot: 10 ft. side yard.setback , , Accessory structUre54 up to 528 sq. ft. in site=5 ft. setback from side and rear lot lines r Acces so ry structures: up to 1000 s . (where alloWed) See applicable zoning district setbacks Zero lot line lots: mini tm 10 foot separation between build ii s Multi-family residential building separation: See Code Section 18.96.030 Page 1 • LL. ' r h • 4. W ' , I I SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS Flag Lots: Maximum height of 1.1/2 stories or 25 ft., whichever is less in most zones; 2-1/2 stories or 35 ft. in R-7, 2-12, R-25 or R-40 zones if standards of Code Section 18.98.030(8) are met. Builc4i.n4;,Hertight"g4eptivons (Code Section 1`t 4:b8:02,0),: E u l:5E ntg'` located in . ' a non-residential zone"inay be built to a height of 75 feet provided: ' . :, "'. A minimum FAR (building floor area to site area ratio) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; .a 2. All actual building setbacks will be at least 1/2 � the building's height; and , , 3. The structure will not abut a residential zone , district. RESIDENTIAL DENSITY CALCULATION ,� .. Community Development�ent Code Chap ter 1 49 2 specifies c ifies th a t the net , - residential unit_s__alleyed on a particular site may be calculated by dividing the area of the developable area by the mum number of ,; square feet equixed per dw- ling unit in the applic a zoning district. \ Net devel. -nt area is cal.-, fated by subtrac • g the following land area(s)I , oars the gross site are ;1, 1. All sensitive lands - eas land within the 100 ear oodplain -- slopes exceeding 25% ,1 • drainagewayr ` `" '' . iand;dedi..caited for r.`k urpases . 3. Public right-of- , dedic.tion 4. All land p r o v' ed for p r vat e streets (includes udes accessaa s , . . through p- ng 'areas) The City •. " ....-.0 allow a residenti 1 density (transfer of up to 25% of the units that could otherwise have neen developed on sensitive lands fi areas listed in (1) above to the d=., ehopabie portion of the site in accordance with Code Section 18.92.030 p It is theresponsibility ant or a residential development ' ' caf the f application to provide a detailed ca culation for permitted residential density and density transfer. I RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SOLAR ACCESS REQUI"E, ENTS Effective May 1, 1991 all subdivision: and minor partitions are subject to '..` solar access requirements which Stat.- that 30`% of all lots developed.must ' be solar-oriented. The chara .eris ics of a solar-oriented lot are high house orientation wintertime �.. g to the hgoused ,; tertime sun striking t .e sot.�th walls and roofs of th . 7 ientation maximizing south indow area, and a south-sloping roof area. To achieve this, one may ut'lize` the .following:. es i a of with at least 90 feet of north-south j',�' Basic requirement: D sig w • lot dimension and An orien.t.ti'on within 30 degrees of south; t 2. Protected Solar Building L r e: The solar 'building line FU st a) be oriented within 30 degrees of south, b) have a minimum 70 feet t • between it and the middle .;0 f the lot to the south... c have a minimum is '. of 45 feet between it and he northernmost buildable boundary of the k5' , lot on which the buildin% line is located. 3. Performance OptionS: T ;_ first option requires the house ' to be ,, oriented within 30 degr es of an east-west axis and 'have at least 80% of the ground floor south `Wall protected from shade. The second . Page r . r { d • option requires at least 32% of the glass and 500 square feet of the roof area to face south and be protected from shade. Total or partia exennpti.o, o a site from the solar access requirement can be for the f•• lowing reason ,,, 1. Easy, west or north slope; steeper than 20%. 2. Off-site shade sources (st ctures, vegetation, topogr, - y). 3. 0 site shade sources (vege' ation). Adju.stm-nts allowing reduction of t'a 80% solar design requirement can be for he following reasons: 1 11. Re«aced density or an incre.:9ntd cost of at least five percent due 1 to east, .p st or no slope gr;•ater than 10%, -� significan` -natural feature, - existing road or lotting pat tern, - public easement or.right-of- ay. f 2. Reduction in important dovelo. rent amenities. 3.• Pre-existing shade (vegetation) Maps and text sufficient to show the development complies with the solar s design standard, except for lots for which an ''exemption or adjustment is required, including all of the folio ing items 1. The north-south lot dimension id front lot line orientation of each proposed lots 2. Protected solar building ines and relevant buildin g site restrictions, if applicable. 3. For the purpose of identifyi g trees exempt fr�:t Section F, a map showing existing trees at least 30 feet tall and over 6 inches diameter at a point 4 feet above grade, including their height diameter and species, and st-ting that they are to 'ibe retained and are exempt. 4. Copies of all private restr ctions relating to solar access. If an exemption or adjustment i requested, maps and text sufficient to show that given lots or areas in he development comply with the standards • for such an exemption or adjustment shall be submitted. RESIDENTIAL DENSITY TRANSITION Regardless of the allowed •using density in a zoning district, any property within 100 feet o a designated eatabliuhed area shall not be developed at a density' greater than 125 percent of the maximums . Comprehensive Plan designation (not zoning) of the adjacent parcel. T PARSING D ACCESS ¢ Required automobile parking for this type of Use: C pev^ °t-"�`• Secondary use required parking: Y '. ii of re�L red' s P aces may e �g aa � P aonl y spaces. Standard p arking space dimensions: 9 ft X 13ft. I Compact parking space dimensions: 8.5 ft. X 15 ft andicapped parking: All parking ai ead P� oviL dy i n g in excess case o f five ve required automobile parking spaces shall provide appropriately located and designated handicapped parkin9 spades. The �in:, nut n umber of handicapped I � Page 3, • r I i I I . - Ste° •a .; �' .' ' n y parking spaces to be provided and parking space size are mandated by the Oregon Revised Statutes (see handout). A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be provided. Bicycle racks are required for civic uses, non-residential uses, commercial uses, and industrial uses providing 15 or more automobile,; parking spaces. Bicycle parking must be provided at a ratio of one bicycle rack space per 15 auto parking spaces„ Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic. The Planning Division can provide specifications for approved bicycle rack types. All parking areas and driveways must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: Minimum number of accesses: Minimum access width: Maximum access width: Pedestrian ac;e s must be provided between building entrances and parking in 9 areas, outdoor common areas, and public sidewalks and streets. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and � � P g accesses, see Community Development Code Chapters 18.106,and 18.108. CLEAR VISION AREA • The City requires that clear vision be maintained between three and eight feet above grade at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections in specified clear vision areas. The size of the,required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. LANDSCAPING Street trees are required for all developments fronting on a public or' private street or a driveway more than 1001 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private ' property within siX feet of the right-of-way boundary. Street trees Must have a minimum caliper of two inches at four feet above grade. Street I trees I should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on mature tree size. I Further information on regulations affecting street trees and a list of Y from the. ing !. . . , recommended street trees may be obtained fro' Plana bxva.s.�on • • around parking ne tree. per seven ar}��.ng spaces must effect. Landscaped � A minimum of one p ' a n areas in order to provide a canopy e� p parking areas from views must be `.1 screening of park` g �' from public rights-of-way m provided. g t •t , a. n 41. N w I !. • M••. _ h •t • IA' 1 •f •'1 - 1. p,./ 1, gyp•• a.. k BUFFERING AND SCR EENING'' In order to increase privacy and to reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site . . qu � ` y perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and E evergreen trees and shrubs. Site obscuring screens or fences are also g � required in some cases, and often are advisable even if not required. J. Required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and sidewalks. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in Code Chapter 18.100 and the Planning Division bulletin on landscaping and buffering. Required buffer widths applicable to your proposal area: ft. along north boundary ft. along east boundary ft. along south boundary ft. along west boundary In addition, sight obscuring screening is required along l e., C�V`'4 � C-/C,, b1. T"fly C l i-4"1 e` If jzir L �. VO tipdd.'i(, .f SIGNS Permits must be obtained before erecting any sign in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. • Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the 'gign proposal is revie'ded as part of a development application. SENSITIVE LANDS Z"elA` V ADDIT?JNAL PLANNING CONCERNS OR CCMRENTS I , ( +A •i I . _ w.......1::wr.wY Ir+,•wur•" I , „ i ., ."wrr.�..�i..wr•.•. F n 1• { , i i ' it • y I ' y it 1. ttt I ",.0 .,..Jr..,k....«.._ ..........,w.xA..,.i 4_wl.w.N. ..x.,+.. ........1..a.t..-..,..,i. ., _._ .. i i __.,_„.... , . „ ....... -.. I .u.l. u .rHWH r:.✓rJ.».+.-r+.aaro.oz:war.":G:....%.1HLUii...o-.9...+r..i }. • • . ' PROCEDURE Administrative staff review. Public hearing before the land, use hearings officer. Public i gearing before the Planning Commission. ;'�' Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. Another public hearing is held by the City Council. . ° . , All applications must be accepted by a planning Division staff member at the community Development Department counter at City Ball. Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications submitted after 4:30 P.M. on ' Thursday will be batched for processing with the following week's applications for processing. No applications will be accepted after 3:0O • . P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other days. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded in advance to 8.5 by 11 inches. One 8.5 inch by 11 inch map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. • • The Planning Division and Engineering Division will do a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 10 days of submittal. Staff will notify an applicant if additional information or, copies of the submitted materials are needed. - The administrative decision/public hearing typically will occur ;,. approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as complete by the Planning Division. , Applications involving difficult iseuea' or requiring review by other jurisdictions. may take additional time to review. Written decisions are issued within 10 days of the hearing. A 10' , day appeal period,follow e all yiecisione. An appeal Can this matter would, be heard by the ' 14a1Ve1S5dee A basic flow diagram illustratin g process review �rocess is available from the Planning Division. are at o conference� `and�� the notes of the, conference • P pP intended to inform the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to development of a particular site and to allow the staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects Of good site planning that shetld apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide any information required by the Code shall ' not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or. requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Comiiriunity Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to . •• . ' Code requirements prior to submitting a n application. :•, . - Another conference is required red ,i anapplication� x.s to be submitted more than Si x mont hs after this� pre-a pp licat on conference, unless the second co nference is deemed unnecessary by • the Planning Division, . + PREPARED By: . �w �'" ,; i?7�.NN1�iG Dl 1S1ON • PHONE. 639-4171 Page 6 N r • r , r 'N• , I( .. :7"--,-,- [ : - ._ , _-_ -..- __ ..- , ',..\X'_ _ -- .or )1/4,,%..- . # The City __of ;:i.-- _- '-- -'• . _ 4 / / / I EV -.... i / --(..._...__..____ *41 -- rril I 6-11 A R D _ - - - . itt . .. . .. . il __ . ., _ z___ . . . ;-''' is _ -,,,-.. 40 i ...„,,,„.,.,:>._...-------- ii . . ,.. _ _ . iP - _ . IP 1 . / /_,./ -Ss:P **7*.'- _ :,-. , i . _ _ <4.. i . * 4# 4 4,, e , 40# q ..,..... II * I _...._44.., . 4 '' ' _ , ii _ z.. .: --:,.: _-r 1 \--_- e.„: ., ..,_ _ ,_ - r � -� � At .. : DURHAM i 4 i - _ • -.. . • I� '"'` - \s S i_te Area -1 (_,.,_,_____- _ - - - -_ j[ - - & -Li - \.� -� .. : aR.. _ _ I 4 - T' - - - - _ - - -•Lk\c\is S _ _ . jJ E 4. . n Z ,, : ,- ,,, _,,..,...,„,„,,,,,,,A„, , -_ : _E -- ',,,,,,,..;-:"Y4k,,,,, ,,,,.1.-$.` -- . if 4 _ . . ._ / I : _4 _- _ ' lin _- -- _',Is:7,z,,...,,,,,.,7..;‘,_,,,,,,,,,,..,,,,..._,,,,\-,,,,_,,„1 . _ps,--.,V-':-:`,Z,V__7;3.,-,...°- ",:‘,..,,,,,,,,t.,M,Z,*;`,:-:' 1 i., „:-..,-.:,,,,,,,,s,--.,..,:.-;,,,,,.-,-",_,:`,-N.-tit X.,Z,-,,,,,, I _ , -joilmr_ 4 _ _ .. up _ ,,,,:-..,,..,,,,;,,,,,-,-,.1 ,--$.N. ,,,,,,,,,, --,,,Z-Sr...S-., ,,,, :;., ;,\X,.-\ ;:., , F-------"''',,,,...„..„..,...„.... um - •i -_.---•"- A , . /I•___• ili Digital dctarncp :e¢reaeR- totfnn aongfled by t6c ils7 .t_ of Tigard atili,fng �aagra- { - F ~� ` gbtt lnfarnaflaa System II I - �C j 6fS saftaare_ fWfer- j T F tratian par:ra;ed flare ° ' r ilk. F ._' ,��- may 5a lit Lap 6e ; - vted :ith addidtral I - NORTH to ob a d _ - - _ - - _ - - - - - -- _ - - -- AfCaI II / d is fntsrgrsfatirs a as dateralne3 y �_: - _:i.lar.re.,.11,1?:',„,7AMM fhe City of I .- ° ' - C II ' ' COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC., Legal i •. ,r P.O.BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 Notice TT 7014* BEAVER i ON,'OREGON 97075 ��__�.—_ �--' _ �_ :,... '' `, • , r SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW $DR 91-0014 (�� f~ � `� � � E Y STWOOD ' Legal Notice Advertising (WO#6) The Director has approved,subject to conditions,a Site Development Or 0 2 199 I� Ta�arsheet Notic Review request to develop an approximately 46,192 square foot general " of Tigard retail store and related parking facilities at the Tigard Towne Square shop- ' ' '1 `DX 23397 r i'M� OF TIGARD, ping center.ZONE:C-G(General Commercial).The C-G zoning allows '�d 97223 °" 0 0 Duplicate Affida public agency administrative services,public support facilities,profes- sional and administrative servt,:,::s,general retail sales, financial,in-' '• ® surance,real estate services,business support services,and single-family , residential units among other uses.'LOCATION: 16200 S.W.Pacific w.t Highway (WCTM 281 153A,tax lot 101). APPLICABLE REVIEW '014 . .s• CRITERIA:Community Development Code Section 18.120. • „AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION '•4 . � f L• ._ ,,,,,, . i; - . OREGON, ) '• . F WASHINGTON, , 4'p �I. 111114► daily sworn, depose and say t! a e Advertising ��` , � Qa l, r his principal clerk, of tho...,.___. ' araes �U ,� of general circ ation a defined in ORS 19 .010 r .. . sii0.3N 1 c a�©. •,l .. ' era 9 c�` � the � � � - �• e 0;published at___,--- ar in `''' """" '� �� .. , , c unty and s�tata ,that the / w I '''' • �)evelo• ent; ma•s , i. ,, M ,: C d, was publis"-,ed in`the 'I, "' v� 't: i'f" opy of which is hereto annexed, , "' Qne successive artid •41'..f., ; �;. . • e of said newspaper for_-____- u �'�' ,�...�__ issues: -. t;9a1,6ame;•I "t.;. ., e in the following n err ,#,.:;t z;) ., ;T.i• �,. ...., .-- , feng• ber 21, 1991 +.,," '----�r.,� , ,�Er IJJL4Ej "++."'^r.,,,ti '1. 21st da of November, .. d and sworn t7 before me Chia The adopted finding of facts,decision,and statement of c nditions can be ( • obtained from the Planning Department,Tigard Civic Center,13125 S,W: • r,P.O. ox 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223.The decision shall be -�..:,,., r. Notary Public for Oregon Hall Blvd,P. f �,• �w final on D cember 4. 192,.Any party to the decision may appeal this , /!/i decision in accordance with Section 18.32,290(A)and Section 18r32.370 fission xpires: y-- "` / ----- of the Conlmttnity Tevelapiuent Code,which provides that a written ap- i'T peal may fill filed a►e an within appeal s'days after December given and sent!The death 4 � g beer 4., 1991. , TT7104 ' btish November 21, 1991; 1 1. •,' x. rw f. ..,.r.. n w. ,y..w,+:JJ✓++...-,r...r s ,.....H./ ..,.,4...i+w•..'i:A1✓1f,.0 JC1,...:JJ.t.r...-N:.MI rrt1 uNFkCr+'v..u.u. r ' r.i..+.-.+. ...1 ...,.{ J.. ._ V.r,..i. ......r._•,._1 ,._ _ .. ,.,.._... ,....n..._.a....... . .n...u+.. n..r .,... .., n ... - r. ..y.-a. r4 m r ,e'"A ' , " Y RE COMMENTS OME NTS REQUEST FOR C a TO: ; DATE November 14 1991 ,I . FROM: Tigard Planning Department REVIEW SDR 910014 FOY WESTWOOD (NPO #6) A request ., � RE: SITE 1DEVELOPMENT ,_ -, ' for Site Development Review approval to develop an approximately 46,192 , 1., square foot general retail store and slated parking facilities at the • Tigard Towne Square shopping center. 74;7E: C-G (General Commercial). The C-G zoning allows public agency t, tainistrative services, publ .c support facilities, professional and administrative services, general. retail sales, financial, insurance, real estate services, business support services, and single-family residential vklits among other uses. LOCATION: 16200 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 2S1 I5BA, tax lot 101) APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: iCom!uunity Development Code Section 18.120. y . Attach,.id is the Site Plan, applicant's statement, and Notice of Decision for your ' revica. If you wish to comment on this application, or appeal this decision, we t, need your comments by Dec. 4, 1991 You may use the space provided 'Y.elow or . u, - attach a separate letter to return Air comments. I£ rou are,unable to respond , hy the above date, please phone tx,, gaff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your, comments, in wri,.‘ng as soon aS possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23'397,' 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard,' Ok 97223. PHONE: 639-4171~ STAFF CONTACT: tTerry Offer PLEASE CHECK TAKE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: r We have revie4ed the proposal and have no objections to it. I Please contact of our office. ,.oa,' '. Please refer to the enclosed letter: Written Comments: I , . I J. yt Name o f Person g son Commentin : .... N --- I � '. Phone Number: j • I I L I '=,' bkm/SDR91-.i4 o B I I I II I • S', I . . . ' _.,_. .. i.._......,.•.......... ,v.... .. _ . _ ., - -. .. , ., ., ....,��_..... a•'.F. .N.u.wv•r..t.a,n.a..,....w.,ul v.t.,... ,r ,• Ok ...1/1/1 `lOTIFICATION LIST FOR ALL APPLICATIONS n, r 1. NPO NO.' (2; p i;3s GPO�' 7.4, 1w 2. CITY DEPARTMEN �w B ilding'Official/Brad R. Parks & Recreation Board ' Police ity Recorder _ Field Operations Engineering/Chris D„ Permits Coordinator/Viola G. . 3. SPECIAL DIS CTS Fire District School Dist No. 48 (Pick-up box) (Beaverton) Joy Pahl PO Box 200 Beaverton, OR 97075 r.; Tigard Water District School Dist. 23J - 8777 SW Burnham St. (Tigard) Tigard, OR 97223 13137 SW Pacific Hwy. Tigard, OR 97223 f Tualatin Valley Water District - 6501 SW Taylors Ferry.Rd. Tigard, OR 97223 , 4. AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS • Wash. Co. Land Use & Transp. Boundary Commission 150 N. First Ave; 320 SW Stark Rooi5 530, Hillsboro, OR 97124 Portland, OR 97204 � , Brent Curtis Kevin Martin METRO _».. Joann Rice 2000 SW let ave. Scott Kin g Portland, OR 97201-5308 __. ' Fred Eberle _� Mike Borreson DLCD (CPA's only) �� City of Beaverton -- 1175 Court St. NE Jim Hendryx Salem, OR 97310-0590 " P Box 4755 eaverton, OR 97076 - Other City of King City _ City of Durham City Manager City Manager f' ' 15300 SW 116th 1`7160 SW Upper Boonea Ferry Rd. . King City, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 City of Lake Oswego City of Portland • City Manager Planning Director �. 3.80 SW A 1120 SW 5th nke Oswego, OR 97034 Portland, OR 97204 State Highway Division r , - Bob Doran , PO Box 25412 Portland, OR 97225-0412 5. SPECI AGENCIES I' General Telephone Ar. tland General Elec. • Ruse Wells Brian Moore , • 12460 SW Main Stu 14655 SW Old Scholle Fry. iBeavertott OR 97007" gard, OR 97223 Beaverton, ' NW.Natural Gas Metro Area Communications 1 --' -._.__'Jason Hewitt ' • Scott Palmer • 220 NW Sedond Ave. i in Oaks Technology Center Portland, OR 97209 1815 NW 169th P1ade 6-6020 Beaverton0 OR 97006-4886 • TCI Cablevieion of Oregon Mike HalloCk Ds West 3500 SW Bond St. Pete Nelaoh K ., Portland, OR 97201 421 SW Oak St. } Portland,'OR 97204 Columbia Cable (Frank Stone) 34200 SW Brigadoon Ct. ° . I. Beaverton, OR 97005 ,. 6. STATE AGENCIES I' Aaroriatti-s Div. (000T)Engineer �._. d ion of State Lan ds card of Health �� C Dept. - P ar k Parka• � � Fish Wildlife Div. CDC Subdivision Supervisor bept. of Energy y PDC' • , Dept. df En�Viron. Quality rite Marshall Othar,___�_�_ 7. FEDERAL AGENCIES. Corps of Engin€sere Other ___ PoSt Office 6. 1 OPHE# Southern Pacific id raneportstiori Company 7dane M. Forney, PLd ^ Project,Engineer 1 000 NW 6th Av ente R. J240 Onion Station 1Port1and0 .OR 97205 . I , I I , I I aw✓ I . w_ ,• „ .....rr..i . r..J nwKa.Nxt411sk «'"JyHI♦•,.t ItH U-el'+..'f.Y+w .. ,«. . • / , r' 5815 SW PATTOA''M SCtOAD i Y s 1 ,...w' PORTLAND,' OR'‘9a21 25115A0-01700 .. . .. 2S115A0.-02700 »... ...'... ' BISHOP, LAVERNE -. ESTATE OF STEVENS, LARRY D JULIE F , ' 1008 BAL30A AVE 16425 SW .113TH ' BURLINGAME CA 94010 I TIGARD OR 97224 ' 25115A0.-02703 ••r..•.•. r .•• . . • . ... 25115A0--02704 ' MOFFAT, NORMAN R FOSTER, ROBERT B AND '• PATRICIA ANN KATHERINE E .7 . 16445 SW 113TH AVE 16565 SW 113TH OR 97223 9722,3 ' �, TIGARD TIGARD OR 1 . 2S115A0--02705 •••••,••• . . . . • •J • 2$115A0-022801 .. r . ..... . .•.. .r ...• ' ' . BRAND—BROADWAY ASSOCIATES ', CRAIG, JAMES N AND VICKI J ,i, , KARNO, NORTON S 16325 SW 113TH AVE • 16255 VENTURA BLVD SUITE 1200 TIGARD OR 97224 . ENCINO CA 91436 I 2S115A0-02803 ' ' , , 2S115A0-03100 •• .'.•• .• • • . •.. • •r •••. MUIR e HOBERT H WESTWOOD CORPORATION, , 16285 SW 113TH' DEVELOPERS & CONTRACTORS '. • TIGARD OR 97223 3030 SW MOODY AVE ' : PORTLAND OR 97201 2S115BA• 00102 .. . . . . ' 2S115BA-00103 4. . . . ... . . . r . ..•o .• . , ' WESTWOOD HOLDING CORP WESTWOOD HOLDING CORD 3030 SW ;MOODY 3030 SW MOODY PORTLAND OR 97201 PORTLAND OR 97201 1 2S11ODCw00400 . r • ?••••. • . • .I• .• • r. • • ' 2S110DC«00500 4 . . . ,. . ••0 • 0 .. .4« .. DURHAM / 99 ASSOCIATES 1 LUTON, ROBERT C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP BY TUALATIN DEVELOPMENT CO BY CARL DARKS REALTY SERV. ; ' ' ' ' I PO BOX 8041 • 77 WATER CITY NY 10005 BLACK BUTTE RCH OR 97759 ' NEW YORK T I ' 2S110DC-01300 . . • . A41 . 0' ■ 044h 2S110DC-00600 .• • ••...0L .r . •• •• 4. r. LUTON ROBERT C COAST FINANCE INC PO BOX 8041 1 '11205 SW SUMMERFIELD DR BLACK BUTTE RCH OR 97759 TIGARD OR 97224 . y rJ� 2511D007 00 . . e •e .w rr 4'. .•• . . . u . 25 11ryDC-008 00 r4 ..u ♦r• • .• .4,4•.•• ••• ' COAST INC FARWEST ASSOC; SUMMERFIELD DR, '' 1 TA.NGLEWOOD ASSOCIATES T I CaARO OR 7 2 2 4 PCM ASSOCIATES 11205 C� 400 $W SIXTH AVE, #1106 PORTLAND OR 97204 H +l' ti u s A R WASHINGTON OU NTY OR EC 4r/.-- SEE MAP ti t 626IFS" 0. . a29 SAT. T� 1 e- D[ � R0A Q g_ 14 . F_ 3T-31140 �,. -�'L 40-48302 403.68 `$g tea • -� all �� /�., a EOCY t I ! 374 c. T3.29 it, I E, z I � 25 Lj :L - = = g �_._ f �' v 'r'S�> 39 4' f - - - o = - t`•.15g _ ,, .... 3:7.9 Ac. GIRO , Z.- i; 1800 3 4 _ _ _S - - - - - - - - - - - SEE- MA�' I 7 - - — — _ — �. T e �-, 2S f 15 BA t 1 104 2 go c. p i "' 2 4 o y¢ t t ` i 496.04 , 0 t - ':a•1 oo , aa'EASEMENT >• 72 AC, 629.86 it:90 47` r _. t - 2403 ,--2-864: L004t_ 1-1:6 of 1900'n 2.15.7 At. k_1 t f • • 389°42.E. ° SSO 333.2' ao lj3o♦ toy 670 _�= 4 3 29` 2.03Ac see CS �� `33`$ 76 Aa i. o 23- 78 N « P1 p --542-' . n 329• � 'at 4-?.0 i3o.o�- 2101 2100 0'_ 27o2 m -66.1°.. 6 3.69Ac.220 Ess.a $ (i_S. NO.i313R3t • ac Cr) - it ;♦ 437:0= a 2 -- al Ir, 2200 - 77* 32',''�' _ - 6 60` 40 4,o G A c* 1_1 a` 2600 ,{" -WEST _ - - J �'. p3 t t t 1C° • • . I_--- - _ 437.0 -7 - ° I WEST 38�' - - - - -- 260 r< < = 1"-CD._ - - - •-........, '_• - - _ - - - -- - -_ - --_ - - ----_- - --- - - - _ - F .. - - - - _ _-- i_--- - - F -SEE -MAP- _ -,,z 2,5 1 l.5BD Sas.w' W - " L N E5--2 7' _ F 260 2302 9 s 305 � ` A 233 = tC S0 10et1 I a> rs - .--:- - __,_ ___ _, _____ _ _x t LL___H_ _s 850 2 0 E N ' . e 1 l 1 ITS '_ - -t.Z—,.PSG., '-�� I�• £' <`_ a�zz: F R .5U�3 1, 2400 or w - - _-- -- L= — I A. T - FI 5? - ! 8 At - - AC. T 7 �- j g02 •E 2303 j ,.1 /.28 Ac, 140 . - 2300 " A - - -- s B5 c_ e F 0 ;-____ - \ , . -- _ - - - - - -- _ __ - - - - - s 0 - - !S A c- e 9 ,` y k/!"!I i _ - - CENTER OF. ► I� - tbDO' M/`- -- --- - — k -_ „� c14 SEE MAP E SEE -MAC' o �o 2S 1 15C - - 2 E I- 1 j} t - t .:„ -- it`o.:- -__ __ 1 __ __ . :-}.0"....., ' .- - -,-._: __,*_ *_,-,.:-sT-t±-±:,-,-.-=k„_,,. _ ,_--.. - _ s r. - - > G is ILI I c 1'X! _. f. :__.a a v Q,,,01-4 3F1:IN.GTON. COUNTY OREGON. - - SCALE Lir=. I-0fl` - - - r - CANCELLED TAX LOTS - B - r 603,604,2'_00,300,400, _ MAP F, 2S ! [4 DC` IL -•, /.t j , ? - - I _ "7 = r _ 1 - : ` {7-6-N_ N� !/4 ItER gu:t 432U ) ` _ - t ! _ — -- ` cesi C.R. N0: 429 I 8E6.0 429 13.., �J� —__ -�ao.T f VACATED R&.0 T3-29 ,• -- - - 0 -- - -_ 8.48 AC. - p f - r. _ - n / : / _ . 71 I 3 I (CS.22,812) &-o 73.Z8 a� 1 I 4.. m ai . sQ h 0 N 89°55-`201*1N - 4 l_ r k 20 ,c i_ I 8.#83,4 I -aril / / S & '�7a FS 1.;3.18 8 0 f, ` `'` . &S-�� E _' SEE MAP i; p 1j4 P z s ,p 10377 son 2IG. I 11 7 / CI _/ :.--'. ' 01. v f 01 __ _ l '`a� f r j E. i Q 23,7.4 _ : . : IT. ge r� sf st - L _ :. / 41'4.. / 1 a-to t ;•y_ _- _ _ - O-0 - - - _ - - --- - - --- - b . . • � � � .. ...r..LLl -..}1W-ALP,laW.1,Vn�h•�. ♦ D Lai W � 0 ��.� Z < w u) cr O (!J '11 AY E01r1 4C 0 0 d t c.. 0 M I 1 • , , • 1.\\' h. I 1 40. 1 ; r '�„ ,..4 a J ��, r % S' 0 • dl ,r • . 0 7 11 w �} „ • r (r) , •''' W • CO / I, (" s mU a ,..) C. ,.. .,,, Ntao O (I) a ti M, U- > I M �. %t N 7 r� N a • , a N. (,J , vi , q ry 3 / a /ice/,• ` ,. �/ � a b 7 V ...,c,. "'ir `�',4,, f •/ '1 ,V ""� ,fir` -J ��` ..,Ry a i''' i 0 r, e �' c N I i I Lai / , Cr) CI f i r,1 I• • =- t' ` -�-�_ e- ; y j S._1 [j 1_ � 921.90 �` ) (901.06) • / 26 .46 235.30 a4 .7r C N 89°-40`44°s: " is 700 7 600 - ` 4 3 84 AC_ L. 150 AC t0 AC,. }= F to=a:•...- i- - ZOD T ' 0_ffj_fj _ - _ _ - - - _ - __ - - - _ # - - - -_ - _ _ - -- - . t [ 95t : - _ - 40 44 Al 89'40'44"£ �y l G +n 0x �' ' a)g (CS.20,358) a o'n ` •u fix air e 64s sT - . oN i- o16` , a?•,y fl- sV f s � . sRsT�4 (t3a.58� �--15.6! S 89°5G' �`issa.7-)., Ste'` �� ` ,I --- - - - - - _ - 111.1> - -a Qf' pr _N ss.. ;n � s- 'i - ID' /-' .. .3st COMMON 330 - -r 263.1E! v,z Q° rC .22 Q .d/AC ��, AR `f, S @9a 52' T�`W , - �E VAR � /S0 0.z - N 89°2 "W 4 433 "". _ - DTi4 k=432.45 _ r_ E 47.00 CIS R 429-4;--' WIDTH ) • 8EG C€Z +129 114-_ r )�t: 60.43--ai t° f ° - - - -�fTS�t ,- .- - -- VACATED R a 4 75-=29 ° + 1 - . .� at . i. SEE NtA P r SEE MAP_ , 1. ti ZS i [5 EA z 2S 4 i 5 A _ ° • i ..glo,:x-----ao:_-- _ - Its. _ . WASHINGTON COUNTY OR _� SEE MAP • • eye .:' j ,. 2S I 1aa� LE_ ,�SCA � G.Qv 1 1- E- ;I ._ 429 aura- Tr t DU:R HAIA ROA D 0 87-31140. 4o .68 a-4a�a2 • i?P3AC I.• z7?0 ti I <3T4c. y3.29 I 4 • en • 1 E PI 18 ? g� ,; �, a a' _. • N- bon 1 !l - L 'i- 5.79 r Ae. 23 411•714111. I i. 2S I 15BA t; . g: I I_ � 1802 4° 4 �- F c .16Ac. 1' 496.04 _c. 0 . 0 r' �310 . L ZO EASEUENT A 'AC. $29.3& 89°47'W - < 3 II' 98.de_ !�$t Ac. p -- 894' =q.98 �� ,t ei y E. t.63 4c. t_f a. 41 V kJ yes "/ .2 _ 0.. _____989. 42'E. s 2 --' s3.2' i `3 i 1 h 400- — ----— -- — �� °�� i' - ' - See CS*10670 3 I 3-29 `7Ae 3 1 r - to o 1 ! ;N ,_ Z *— r _ 3R2 E2;! TOT 22° 0 0 27�2 = Ac_ a -5:69Ac. 1. `,• ` �� 3A e. .JSAe 2ZO --150.0 p X (C.S. No-13139) �. 3 20 L1-, y 2 4 37.0 br- 3, °''8' .J z 2200 oo 32 i E 2�� tc !� WEST -394` - - s 8f_8d Ac r 1 f li - 5 f''" . I ?-1 S T �2� 2200 7O ` ,. �! w f 4-60.4c. ;71- • f, , w $I.i511c; 1 I � - ; t3 I, _ S:EE MAP _ 1 ; t IBD sss.�. _ . E-: 155 - 1 ` \s 2301 (.., N 85'z7'w ' I f.a6 2302 { 2305 tc S.tv 0{C3$4f) Ac .86 Ac, m 1 1 `& ,� i.60 Ac. 5 ° 2 HH is5 •• t3 • , \I:17.._......71• - f. — 1.529c. 1 1.78 Ac. 2304 E{ I { .T6Ac. f F t 10' It { 1 SOS°3F'E t1 (a 2303 /.zaAc. 140' ` �"� 2300 z ,86 Ac. f- r a to ' V 553'27 15 0 /"` I. _ -, �� fr/�/ ~ /f- tv R 1 f lfl` if ' if/ - CENTER Qrr I -. /-f - LiEGT1QiY � � r ,. / - 43 T f Z ii,,,, .0 s I `' ,' SEE MAP SEE MAP 9 ` , t 25 1 15D ., 2S 1, 15C t ' 2/119- Z . . _ . - i r ° .o- �� ....., �... ...i.... ,E�.., I ..,.....a,.....a.,,.M1"y, t..„,,,,, ...,,,.:,pa_...wx, n,..i.........-.,o-....,a...w...-.. _ »...s«,a,..,.,....,.:..........:.......+.......n,,,...,...,,...-.,r ..,,,,x:-...,.,«r.;r.4.!..;,,...........=..!,..,.:.,,.,,.,_...4..1..iH.. ,.»s.:1 . � /�b ti' i 842.40 "mow ` i 2.7T CHS. ;: '*►M, S 89°48' W • • SEE MAP 300 ' • as I 10CD Q, �'` 4.94 4C• .. / /i r 1• 921.90 ` (90 1,06') 262.06 235.50„E N 89°40 16 . • r, �7 Do 4bO X00 . 7 ,,,k w1.5a AC. '-1 3.x,9 F /a.4C. -,D .n + �ST� ? `� � • 95■ , R Py9b 40'44"E !L► ---"""9 p `,-,:l. 2U 366) � G.S. w p so, / / r- v . 6a r C) p , � ,I, M 4t q � , ..,rc�6 ` 1. S2 � � (110' „V d •� -15.61 S 89°52•7'rW 1 1 „ to r .� • ttD.,9 �,. W � �, u 5 Nrf u .52 AC. M' �� ti w °a��, acv p ap 3d i�y N W. f .93 D d caMMaN o� w 4 '!iR �j V 1 b v a S 5 � A R w ----;430.0 1,0 l9g5'^� `l ` t aH9R;��3 � 2,dS 93 43 t 7:00 OH6, CR. a • • 4 BEG. 0 9,429 1/4 COFt. SO•d3•...•,l w .nr . O VACATED 0 75'-29 to r r , , 6, • I SEE MAP . 2S 1 15BA • ■ - - , " • • to r • 842.40 -- --- I2:T7 CHS, S 89°46' W ;t .ap ea Z. _ . o yPHrASE-2) , 6��9� �g0 6 1.40 . $Q . • ( PHASE-1 R-3H °p \ 92L90 to (901.06) x' e l 403.70 2`0Q Is 1 3.89 AC. • rte* P�, 2 \ 1 • na U3.Et0 Ac. ,, to y /ago I 1 i ' b ' b N w M 0�4 N. �ry N O I Nco fit! A7 'ref' ,A N *I14** 0 15,61 tiSSo 'lg�„ 4 •1,>••,• ••••, h ` (39 36 -I I' 4 'o; w„ o I B` 9 I ' 5 89°52'7i' I 'd -- ... 433' «..�. _ 60-436 (G 29-40 WIDTH ) - 1 ........„..,41/i34�36 ROAD N DURHAM I� i i "„, /0, r ' 25 1 1 5 A 1 1 off �f: ,f , _ r , , . 'a' 0. tl42.4a - -- 1277 0119, a , . $ Q9°X40' W '4 , ' ' 23. :04,74 .!. .' ,,, , I.,.' .H . .'.'. 1--. .. 1 .' . '... . , . , . , :,.... C) 7 ' IA %7 i•/ { � �S g 1 : t ` e $21+50 1 0�1 r z . w �' I r ti }p}•y �J Viz' �J� �, b b' , i , r •k � ...„_,,.,.,.._�.�i.4.,.-.+_..,..... ... ..�...,.,«.�.,..,.....,..............�_,.. ...a..>w N. . ,.,.. 1.-r...w.-.....,..c...wi,...,W,l_..,.rY 4..,....,.r.\.9.....a..-....na.ru.._„u....-.tw...v,-... . w,.a. • ( .•' Lr 9, I; M:+":yWa.aWra�r:+n.w",+-.r+,w,.m—\/.... ,4,..-a.,,,.. t^�'i..r.,i✓...non.lT-e.».-\w...:,,....,,,,'ww:l...,ww.,. .i'"r ww w ww•4,y'rorw• v.✓,,,.+r,xr,,,,, M+ ary- awM,.,,,k,h^ ,»wr,,,,L+ht•r 1 """"„`Lr".uk,.,+wk.v..^'W;•e.rir?M+-♦rl.n,aas..+Ka...rw µ»,LMM .l..r. FF � ,. 1 I • • • • t ep � l Lti w J e�yn W" Ft l'111) y fM trAr w�+ �y itp v' �url t{k T'''' may P mwb� 1rfwyg L 1-i'' rw d 1 ', ' .-- Rai.,"E IPt i", Cff �flYP*N t 3't .a:.ki5\"' N4«~"ro, �0, }"r{r (.r.�:i, ' "u t/ / /p,� w y M m �4h' w, '! , . ii 7 f (r!"' �.P"41«,\c,r1,, 11C,i„�lr r w n doe a .rs ! l I ivit1. 4 r 1L: .i f I 1,.„,11f.?, t I.V X N ' '1T.„# 4l itAk i•°, , I`4f;4CJ1U i )� 10 . � 1 t)'11f,w, 1 , a ',1x t 5 .1v/:}OOD. '(� � E.,�WltiE 1. r vrr^ A 1Ti w I y ti ) ` Ir M k, M,a „m i • tiztPij r,5". C 11' ° ,,,Iprli;�r1�.1. Mt)L,IN"C :ti',)'LL:) i f"C fkit at:; 1�' i,;:i'v"i4'ii: i\f'f' . 4tiit'i 1w)i�1"8�' i" C ,1:D. i , • • ••H 1M'H1#WMiMy W1{.444,,km'V ,,411,'.alink,-0∎P AaiwSw-A•YM4wWrN,.+.dF MApW.-4NY N t, 11 ,VWw.IMM+.4,4N.Y.,.iM.Ib41,00.WMa+....T0rit Ara .n,saM Mn..MMk{iF 'aaH[rlW001,.K'....1 Mnx_0,1 71;.waY.#YH;ha./c,.11,4.>0Y:t Y'.,C_J .l r N•...!/410.1,. ' } I�,p{ AF't:11'.., �y �';' �1y J� 1 „1p.4M(,YY•.,I'AY.� MYVA•IIFaM1 rIM . .C.iiff'4 u)-1E: 1t'°'a Gn I.=P, �.)1 "A141,"t' 6ai'�°!iHi+b Zir/.1 ' >M iM kw , +y +yy fI '!I • 1 I I I A TOTAL, )'/1'"11a11J'b\i'N' Pt:',,,'I D -- N.u4 --,1 kw,Y 1NMA0"'*R'1r1 o 150 " , �. �:��.�•'..w.�.w.:ry 1--.�Am rw:4.,.r;'µ,�..mw..�.�M.� w.w:.w.,+ .�:,..�„J'...�+,v.::.,;M.a.\*... . . .�. 1 n 1 1 • • I I .ri 111,1 ,/.Ih a • idI' • , • • - 1 . I •l -,. ';L:.a J:..,....,.,w,.,..--+v-.-M++'i1..r...,,..+IW.".?„...,:..4.:Ji-.,„•..•_.,.........-,,..t«r1.1a5...ni,w-we.,•••.,.x,N.....,..., ..vrx..:4 5,.r.—,..1.0,...,.1 1F-J+.l.««sYa w ..• .. 4'M IL+AI.,J...._ ,..,...Mr...,r...:lw...,., ... a._u.Mi:.i..................n-..il,.:.w.°..,.....,.M. ..,x..,..r-.�"...,.....:.:.a,-,...rW+4..,4.�•.i.,f-,++r,I•✓...f:wrm. ip r. F E G, , M }. t;Ia sA j . I 5' 5.'i:'a ? ,,,„''41 IF ,...,4, 1, ri F,.' '',.° 4, 144 I. . ,10' ttit.y.cro•Vf ;I„. I. ''° '(a k ! 'yy /''� ry SL+L��V""`U '1I�V ♦0 D ,.,•!, , • DURHAM / 99 ASSOCIATESx t 1. LIMITED PARTNERSHIP , BY CARS .7IS � x'�y� 1' r� ♦f ' W .�»;„44 k�K�w1.M�Ma�� i W ;WWl f(�[ �CM I MF w � ' ^1 I� ' NEW O CITY ' ),, tki,, IeAr 4, r,1 t../c r ,.1.,.'',171-1 � N I't N t�CI� N ,;Ei«i ti�u 4.,„. `/»A ! ,, , , . }W, NIp. iM L Ii►{ail�lliii, qq $ i 1 1, ' 114. �.'ti ii4tflff.fr!, ,,t i�• 611tO.. ,4a$a ,.6,#4 rr P. i • • • I I 1 It> • . I I I I • • . • • . k . • • I, it , • • ••.4,4.....4.f1.•.4,,:.•.,.LG+.,••••....,...uJ:,4,.+.J N a'�IG.«n...,.,... ... ...J.,-.,..Y'.1«-..n wh..Hln�. .uri+,..+-. ... ...,•lN.,...+;F��..R.,n rLr.Z.i.+..1..-1..r+ir.4::ry- a�•h+Uru.n.r A �++b.. .."w.ir,M•.{..-.r.. .,In.,�„u w�,.i`: . ia;.a,w::u.�.,-...,�,� wu...:i::.•k�•.,•+.,u.,4•.«wl..-,•.;rui«.:,..I......w-4T .:.w.-t..,«...;.._ CITY OF TI,GARD, OREGON TO Sue Carver, NPO 6 Chairperson FROM: J7.9:9 Offer, Development ment Review Planner i,. DATE: November 27, 19 91 SUBJECT: Westwood Development Co Application SDR 91-14 Thank you for getting the NPO sommp�nts on the Westwood Development Co. Site Development Review application for Tigard . Towne Square to me so quickly, The Planning Division has considered these comments but is unable to agree with the NPO that a new or revised traffic study should be required as a condition of approval of this development application. The earlier Site Development Review application for the Tigard . Towne Square shopping center (SDR 87-05) was found to be consistent with Community Development Code requirements for access and necessary road improvements conditioned upon certain road improvements being provided by the developer. Those improvements 1. have been completed. The current proposal is essentially the same , as the final , phase of the 1987. proposal, and in fact involves slightly less commercial square footage. We therefore find the current proposal to also be consistent with the access and road improvement findings of SDR 87-05. " < , Since the current application essentiall. seeks renewal of the approval of a portion of an earlier approval that included consideration of a traffic study and which resulted in significant believes improvements, staff belives that a new or revised traffic y stud. . would be only a paper exercise that_ would result in any utd not re . su additional road improvements beyond what was previously required. • Such an exercise would only consume the developer's and. City r° staff's time and energies and would only result in a delay in the t construction of this development. We see no public benefit in traffic study; therefore, the November requiring a new or revised � th 14, 1991 approval of SD,1, 9,16-14 will stand without an amended decision 'b+sing ror�der ed c: Piles StR -14 and SDR 07-.05 • Jerry Foy' Westwood Development • 1 •, M,.»•,....,«w�..s.w........,,_,,..,r+.:,., .+.u-+r,..,:.xw,t�w .. ,-.,...t.:...:.»:t;:...:t..,........ .,.:.A..w....:..a5.A� ..u.....,..,..._..ti..,.:viz.... —ar.«wLAAA**M......-.44,&AAA,, I +c..a✓. ri/ _a . J ;x.itr........:,: a REQUEST FOR COMMENTS Tlx: � � ' `a' 0 DATE: No_give ber 14. 991 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR. 91-0014, FOY/WESTWOOD (NPO #6) A request for Site Development Review approval to develop an approximately 46,192 square foot general retail store and related parking facilities at the Tigard Towne Square shopping center. ZONE: C-G (General Commercial). The C-G zoning allows public agency administrative services, public . support facilities, professional and administrative services, general retail sales, financial, insurance, real estate services, business support services, and single-family residential units among other uses. LOCATION: { 16200 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 2S1 15BA, tax lot 101) APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Section 18.120. Attached is the Site Plan, applicant's statement, and Notice of Decision on. for your review. If you wish to comment on this application, or appeal this decision, we need your comments by Dec. 44, 1991. You may use the space provided below or attach aoeparate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond • by the apove date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments } and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions ding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23:97, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. a STAFF CONTACT: Jerre Offer PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the-proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. -17 Written Comments Name of Person Commenting: .4... Phone 'Number: 6 el - {{ b w�JD .J ■•• NPO #6 \sti:tt„ • Minutes from November 20, 1991 . • After attending a joint meeting for a staff presentation and discussion on tax bills and an update on the western bypass with NPO 5 and CPO 4 at the Tigard Water District, NPO members adjourned to City Hall and the meeting was called to order at 8:54 pm. e Those members in attendance were: Carver, Clinton, Davenport, Dillin, re\ Kasson, Mitchell, Pasteris, Watson, Wilson and Sellers. Excused: Crow The minutes from the October 16 meeting were approved as written. SUB 91-001.F; - KEITH AND JEAN TAYLOR Applicant requested a Subdivision approval to divide approx. 2.09 acres into nine lots on a parcel of land between SW 97th on the west and SW View Terrace on the east. The NPO made a motion to oppose the plan as presented for the following reasons: Members have serious concerns about a) the dimensional requirements being satisfied for lots 4 and 9; b) the waving of the solar requirements; and c) the accessibility of the private drive and continued use of pr,%vate ' drives in this area. Members feel the best plan would be to develop the whole area (which includes undeveloped lots to the north and south) as one coordinated neighborhood which in turn would help facilitate proper street alignment. The motion was unanimous. (Stephanie and/or Phil agreed to attend the ) hearing to make the NPO's presentation. ) SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 91-0014 FOX/WESTWOOD Applicant requested approval to develop a 46, 192 square foot general 4 retail store and related parking facilities at Tigard Towne Square. The NPO made the following totion: Approval of this request is Contingent on Westwood providing an Updated traffic analysis and verification against projections Made by the original traffic study Used in the original development. If significant deviations from the original traffic study are detected the NPO requests a plan to mitigate these effects,u The Motion was UnanimOus. TRIAD UPDATE: Ross Woods presented a draft of their Road Improvement Agreement that will be presented to City CoUnC11. This Agreement does satisfy the NPO's concerns as addressed in our Appeal. After mUch discussion, NPO members agreed to have the Appeal Committee use their best judgment to handle this matter at the hearing tentatively scheduled for December 10. The meeting adjourned at 10:25. 1 IV, '4404 , 11 k 1 Il ..,. «•,alit_,., '..._•.•.. .,.'.,.,,,,,—, ...«-_w..._a.y_.-._„„,.`.. .„...,a....,.,..m_.,,,,,,•.,,.,..a A..._,.........,._,,,«-«+:.-w..z:«,.,,,.._,..,,_,..i...a, _ �.«.t n...,,...«,a,.-,...-:..,«.L .■.4..+«....,w.......NI i...»..«kw::.."»»,+,.M..,.,:,w.=.+aau:r .. . («,.. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON County of Washington ) ss, , City of Tigard ? I, 6-)tr '' Nk LII' &rc - , being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath . depose and say: (Please print) That I am a N. L...Pc i C.P 51S ...1/d t for The City of Tigard, Oregon. _ That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: served NOTICE FOR: That I OF DECISION v”' City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Planning Commission, Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard City Council A copy (Public Hearing Notice/Notice of Decision) of which is attached (Marked Exhibit "A") was mailed to each named persons° at the laddres shown on the , attached list marked exhibit "B" on the $"1"^ day of '_ 'Y`1 A4— 19 f , said notice NOTICE OF DECISION as hereto att ched, was posted on an appropriate bulletin board on the ;, day of k ' ' 1('----�-�-�--, 199(__; and deposited in the United States Mail on the tv, day of , 19` , postage prepaid. bp, ,A,,v1),L iVU,L-0,,tt'\e/Lkrt,-,-, Prepared Notice/Posted (For Decision On].y) d u ",4';'/),,'. +tto rt Y r.4 ,>1 �i , e ;,bed and sworn/affirm to me on the r! "7' day of _/ 'e kb I`+J4 qrMr' • * 7? tt'J 4 yd p "`�0 b �ly..,,',t a w; Fib i �{' i . ,f q+M�"V",3i I1rt��P uq„"�,''. 3S�,�.i��ya /l. � ��x.'/ .'�... L.,�j .I, �f�" • G '`r`;R N, �ti;" NOTARY PURL. •r OREGON -- -, F� `,.,. �' " w. +'n: ,,',,1l ,fir t,'� M Commiss':on Expires: „. y .. d tm� r r Persop, w'' delivered to POST OFFICE Subm ri:bed and sworn/affirm to me on the ' ".�. day of ,if r i.,/ , 19_(f y _.w • 'sT••'Y PU: 1 OF O'tEGOM a rri'' ," My ••Etlmis!.-'ion Exp',ires. of „ r a i k r'r .k,b]m/AFFIDAV.BK 1 • , , I , ...,..r,,,,,,,, .....- - , - «..., .. ....,. .w..,.........«.....:1..,........W.......................w..._.i._.»..4,........:. ._.... -...,...,._.,.....H..:'a' 1..,.....,-....m,,...,u,M.o..i,-....«.aa;,.-..ie...Mw,.........,...,,N......... ..:..::.,t...l,- .:.w— ......«w_........... ' CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 91-0014 WESTWOOD CORPORATION APPLICATIOA7: A request by Westwood Corporation for Site Development Review approval to develop a 46,192 square foot home improvement store and a 2,550 square foot general retail store and associated parking ''facilities at the Tigard Towne Square shopping 4' center. These buildings and parking were planned and approved as part of the original Site Development Review approval for the shopping center but that approval has since expired. Zoning {fit designation: C-G (General Commercial) Location: 16200 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 2S1 15BA, Tax Lot 101) . j ' DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director's designee for the. City of Tigard has APPROVED the above request . subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted below: i A. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Proposal Description The Community Development Director approved Site Development Review SDR 87.05 for development of the Tigard Towne Square shopping center on May 6, 1987 The approved proposal included all of the buildings that have since been constructed on the site as well as an 80,000 square foot retail major anchor store on the southern 41)' portion of the site, retail sales area in the area of the, currently proposed 2,550 square foot space, and a freestanding pad in the southwestern corner of the site adjacent to the Key Bank building. The approval was . granted for a one year period. Implicit in the approval of a multi-tenant, multi-pad shopping center is approval of a phased development plan. However, Code Section 18.120.050,A provides that total time for development of all phases is three years without rea.pr Lying for Site Development Review approval. Therefore, the phased development approval expired. The current application seeks to renew that approval. nl The a pp licants, W'estwoad Corporation, request Site Development evie.w. . approval t v �develop 4H square foot improvement store end a ��550 Square oot Ff associated. ,. general extending parking facilities at t the Tigard Towne Square shopping centex. The se buildings and parking were , planned and approved part of the original site • � � f °'. ,' y ...._._., �.,. .......... _ _... _. ._. ... .... ..... ._.,......._..,..,..,»....,......,..,..,.,..........,...........�.r..,....u„w,.«,..t.:.....«...».....d�si.....u ..»..».I...u. ,.,..»... ,.......»..t-m «..u.,.:.ii.;.,.,au.._,_......-._s.,:4,j...�w,::i�w.u:..».....;f,L„3i...,.x:..ti»..,...,....a,,,.»«.„„,Wa:...,.w.,j r • Development Review approval, except that the building footprint of the home improvement store has been reduced from the previously proposed 80,000 square feet. The � balance of the former proposed footprint would include a • nursery area in the southwestern corner of the store and a lumber storage area in the southeastern corner. The 4 loading and delivery area would be on the east side of the site, as was approved in 1907. Completion of the parking area would add 87 additional parking spaces, including 3 handicapped spaces . Utilities, storm fencing, landscaping along the, boundaries drainage, fen.cin and land.aca of the site are already in place consistent with the approved plans for SDR, 87-05 • 3. Agency Comments The Building Division and the Engineering Department have reviewed the proposal and have offered no comments or objections. Because full utilities 1 and services have already been provided to this portion of the site along with development of the remainder of the shopping center, other utility and service providing agencies were not notified of the current development proposal. // NPO #6 has been notified of the proposal. The NPO will have the opportunity to review the proposal at the ' November 20, 19 91 meeting and will be able to request an ". amended decision to address any significant concerns, if I " such concerns arise. C The City of King City has also been provided with notice of the proposed renewal of the phasing 'plan with the current proposal. . B. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION s )' . The proposed completion of the shopping center consistent , with the a pp roval complies es wlth Community • Development Code C-G zoning distri ct requirements � �for , z�► � � � � inimu�l setbacks from � property boundaries, maximum building height, maximum site coverage (85 percent maximum coverage allowed)o ( 15 percent minimum 1a ed andi landscaping, ��.mum cove � .. minimum� S 1an�s p 1 Site ( � p landscaping required) .� The intended usage of the anchor building as a home improvement center is consistent with the permitted necessary for thec�5 uses in the C-G Tenant, modification perm 2,550 square- , foot sp' ac e betw ee n this new anchor nchor and the h e i ' ' existing as as o n the p ad south of K e y 4 _ 1 r'4 L ank will be reviewed to assure that future uses of these reas will be consistent with the p ermitt ed use s o f the i : NOTIC] OF DECISION SDR 9 1-0014 - w S OOD INC 2 ., 4 ♦ v.. 4 ..Jk .v .....,-,nan-nr N.'.1+V J YA r G 1 .W .l L .♦ ,n...rwt i1,1 w G m+ • w. .. .I k n I» I.r., +AGI.. ra.rk.. • r . -r. _ .,«_,...._...1..«..•.....,,a.Mr.-.._....-....._.r... ,..r.,.». •w-+nw.+.1.w •.,7, ., .r...4..aH.mr.-.P.». » r,..,.ir• ' ' «. .. .M«♦. ....,r.,_..,.ms.µ. r _r .... I ' u..l The entire shopping center development complies with ♦M , Community Development Code Chapter 18,100 requirements for parking area trees and landscaping, street trees, fencing, buffering, and other site landscaping requirements. ' In addition, the total development, with the proposed additional parking spaces, is consistent • : with Code Chapter 18. 106 standards related to required parking spaces for the mix of existing and proposed uses, designated handicapped parking spaces, minimum parking lot aisleway widths, and lighting. Existing accesses to t the site are consistent with the access standards of Code Chapter 18. 108. No additional traffic impacts are anticipated at this time as compared to what was anticipated at the time of the earlier approval. Additional street improvements constructed to mitigate anticipated traffic impacts are therefore not warranted as a condition of this approval. No additional freestanding signs are proposed at this time. Any additional signage will need to be approved through the sign permit process. • C. DECISION ,• The Director's designee a pp roves site Development t Heview SDR 91-0014 subject to the following conditions: . BUILDING PERMITS WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING ♦ CONDITION IS SATISFIED. A m 1. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of rr the building permit application. The plan shall conform to "'Erosion Control Plans - Technical T Guidance Handbook, November 1989 . " UNLESS A SATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE ASSURANCE IS POSTED, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRXOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF AN OCCUPANCY PERMIT: IT. • a landscaping materials i d other nh 2 . The proposed lan ping mat€ra. and ,. C nts Shall be installed in it Conformance with r o f Deed site improvements h i":he approved site plan. STAFF • CONTACT: Jerry Offer, Planning Division. • _ I I T HIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VA__LID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS OF THE DATE OF F I NAL DECISION NOTED BELOW. v • I , I r I I ' ♦ r .# , NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 91 0014 �'ESTWt)OD INC.�GN+� 3 I I r I • {f1 .,• iu.,..,., i..,.,I.•,. .. ..,i 1,. ,.•„ ., ,.,. . i..,.i, .r .. ,..,,,, ..• .,. •i „, ,.I i,r n,i.,.r,.. i ., .,,.... ., w...r« ..,,.. r r„.... .r.. r i. r „•„I.. rr..,. .,, ._ «JlJ:-.;.. ....a.M, ,:«..w.t,......u.,.+ .,.a.,':S,iaJr,H ......,.Mµr...w,u,.,M�G..Fa',.w:f'�,...«r-M«.r...aM•»YA::..s.:.trA... .aua:aca..a,wa D. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: The ar-plicant and owners X_Owners of record within the required distance ?C The affected Neighborhood, Planning Organization Affected government agencies 2 Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL UNLESS 1; AN APPEAL IS FILED OR SUBSTANTIAL REASONS FOR ISSUING AN AMENDED DECISION ARE FORWARDED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION NO LATER THAN 3:30 P.M. ON DECEMBER 4, 1991 r 3. Apppal.: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18,32 .290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. Appeal fee schedule and forms are available at Tigard City Hail, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., z, Tigard, Oregon. 4. Questions: If you have questions, please call Jerry Offer, City of Tigard Planning Department, City of . Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon. f APPRO BY: ick Bewersdti. f DATE Senior Planner jo/westwood.s'dr TICE OF DECISION - SbR 9 NOTICE �L�bOl�r �- � EST�+lOC�D II�C� 4 t' . I •.r . .:«W,wI..Aw..J � 1,L........ .. .....r „. r.. -.- , +•_. r...,_,ay»uc..,:.—.n...H:wl: ,,:.,... ..rn „.,, -Y+...:rM+YW,,.,,�l}4:✓t.c4—,,,,,,', e..........„.v,r , rrc.,,xarl r xw...Y.. ...:.—sw.....c�> ,,i:1,,.,. ..u r„., . .„',,.0 Ij ..V..1.,r1 Vr1 w.LL.w.b r w•vww✓ ' PORTLAND, OR 9722 . '",, ' • b'I,' 2S115A0-01700 2S115A0-02700 I •, BISHOP, LAVERNE — ESTATE OF STEVENS, LARRY D/JULIE '' , ' , .r 1008 BALBOA. AVE ' 16425 SW 113TH BJRLINGAME CA: 94010 TIGARD ' OR 97224_ , , ' ' , 2S115A0--02703 ,. e... 2S115A0-02704 ' . MOFFAT, NORMAN R FASTER, ROBERT p AND ... PATRICIA ANN KATHERINE E 06445.:SW 113TH AVE ' 16565 SW r 113TH . TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S1115A0-027.05 25115A0—02801 - 'r BRAND—BROADWAY ASSOCIATES • .CRAIG, JAMES N. AND VICKI J ' SW 113TH AVE KARNO, NORTON S 1632 5 , 16255 VENTURA BLVD SUITE 1200 ' , TIGARD ', OR,97224 . ENCINC) CA 91436 2S115A0-02803 • - .. . '' , 2S115A0.-03100 .. r.... .. .• • . . , MUIR, 'HOBERT H , ° , - - ' WESTWOOD CORPORATION, . , , 16285 SW 113TH DEVELOPERS & sNTRACTORS • ' TIGARD ' OR 97223 '303Q SW e.•DY AVE PORTS• •P OR 97201 I� ' 2S115BA-00102 • . 4, 2S115RA--00103 .:,� . 'r ' WESTWOOD HOLDING CORP WESTWOOD 'HOLDING CORP ' 3030 SW MOODY . H -3030 SW MOOD PORTLAND OR 97 1 PORTLAND OR 97201 , 2S110DCr-00400 •...... ............... 2S110DC-00500 ....•....••••........ DURHAM, / 99 ASSOCIATES LUTON, ROBERT C tIKITLD PARTNERSHIP ., BY TUALATIN DEVELOPMENT CO BY CARL 'MARKS REALTY SERV• PO BOX 8041 ' ° . 77 WATER STREET ' BLACK BUTTE RCH OR 97759 NEW YORK CITY NY 10 M, 01300 . ...........'. .'. . .'.r, 28110AC-006100 , . , ' LUTON* ROBERT C ' . COAST FINANCE I s PO BOX 8041 I ' I 11205 SW S y.r'�� •. IELD'DR BLACK BUTT ' CB OR 97759 - I'" ' TIGARD O' 9722'4 w , ^}. - ://','''' ',' 5110t�C/-.00700 ♦. .d L O •♦.. A.Y��i .r ' � 25110DC OOl.100 1«.q x INANTCE IN FARWE A55 ICC)AST .,' R�'xLD D OC SGMMERFIELD 11205 Std SOMME ST R �� 'T'AhiGLEWCNJD ASSC� "1CATE5 T1 22 400 SSW SIXTH AVE (�. /�( TES GARD C)R 97 4 P 4i"f AW SOLJ.A.A ,+ VEr �' 1:0161 PORTLAND D CSR 97204 SUE CARV1R 1 GF1�LD FCJ 10155 SW HOODJIEW D SW MOOD "I 1�RD o 97224 PORTLAND 97 2 WE3TGD CORORATION ' ' 1, ' ' I ' 3030 SW MOODY: • POR tN OR 57212 ' Nr 1, . . , ® ' • , ,_ ' ...,.. -_. ..•. -.«,....... ... ...... .... _'_ ., -. ....„ -._.,-,..-...,.. ..,..,.._..r..-....»..4 .v.:....:a._....,.:.+4..w 7.:.w,.,..t.,w......ta:.,w', , w, au.,.. • "'.. REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO: . DATE: November 14, 1991 • FROM: Tigard Planning Department • RE: SATE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 91-0014 FOY/WESTWOOD (NPO #6) A request for Site Development Review approval to develop an approximately 46,192 square foot general retail store and related parking facilities at the Tigard Towne Square shopping center. ZONE: C-G (General Commercial). The C-G zoning allows public agency administrative services, public i.. . support facilities,, professional and administrative services, general retail sales, financial, insurance, real estate services, business E:.upport services, and single-family residential units among other uses. LOCATION: 16200 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 2S1 15BA, tax lot 101) APPLICABLE REVIEW s' CRITERIA: Community Development Code Section 18.120. • Attached is the Site Plan:, applicant's statement, and Notice of Decision 'for your review. If you wish to comment on this application, or appeal this decision, we need your comments by Dec. 4, 1991. You may use the space provided below or attacT a separate letter to return your comments. I vou• are unable to respond by the above date,'please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as If you have any Y g possible. questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223, PHONE: 639-4171. • STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Offer PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: • We have reviewed, the proprsal and have no objections to it • ■ Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Person Commenting:N�. of Oomme ' . � Name f ng s ,_.._.., Phone Number: % ) / �I bkm/SDR91-14.8 f s, 14, • • • .'.......... , - .--.- ...........:......«...'..:.a ..Ib`IUItl, .a4.:,1..........ra.,.tw,•,1..«... K<caE::........,...«.,,r�.v,.r..-., . - ,......N,a,ua....w'......,siW,a.w.,.�,..�I.,.:..x..A..,u<,.....,. ., • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 1 TO: DATE: November .14, 1991 x. FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR. 91-0014 FOY/WESTWOOD ,CNPO #6) A request for Site Development Review approval to develop an approximately 46,192 ' r square foot genera], retail More and related parking facilities at the Tigard Towne Square shopping center. ZONE: C-G (General Commercial). The C-G zoning al';�!..ows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative servanes, general retail sales, financial, insurance, real estate services, 'b'4sine:s support ,Services,, and single-family residential units among other uses. LOCATION:, 16200 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 251 15BA, tax lot 101) APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Section 18.120. Attached is the Site Plan, applicant's statement, and Notice of Deci.si.on for your review. If you wish to comment on thief application, or appeal this decision, we need your comments by Dec. 4, 1.991. ' You may use the space provided below or , attach a separate letter to return your comments. If y2g are unable to res nd bL the above: date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Offer PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. . Pl Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Contents: Name of P n Comnnentin • ` a<•.. 1' 6 Phone Number: 111 lbknn/SDR91-14.tsll •