The URL can be used to link to this page

SDR1991-00010 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. it • .i _ , 1 ` 1 . "r w,-: .at».mnhrr..a;:.`-'.r..m+,�iY:,.,IF...:nJ2»..,.,,r?.14.qi:a,n,A.,n/,-C'nl.e�t�... .µ,...11!&4',,,..,,,...,>„.,,aJ Y,:' ''fi 1, 1 // SI {,,,S.,d» „+a ,a..� 4a tie w1,e ii i l} 41 :s ,.ifi e'1.1 1um:ns waa.9.hs...L+„r kM;7l'.`w.«.--.,,..,•,.,nn..:.,'x-`.-+,.n,=..:Hr.+:-,4 r/ti,,;,,v,a,,. .∎,,,',.:.p i,',4 w',lY 1 J f�y 1 yl�+.«ilwN 4 A m✓1'1 r1 � h . ,•' f. 1 1 1 11 sipt+A,1,91-43010', 4' p�/ 4 ,, ! 1 {!�,l4 5 �► ,,,, �',�A'�.,,, ,.,MITI ►S" '. ' ,1 �wr. l''''''''' 1 «,f tl p I m I .wd.rr:,,��.. - ,., , .,.,., .r.,a. ,. „... .... ... .......,.,,,: -,. -., ,<,..a,. �a.,,..,.,..,..,...,.„.,..,.«-,-.—ax._,uab r.:h.wrw:),a<,d:,«,Y-d,"A..:..t....,..a1;N•,« I,;,.wA,�l.:.:. ..1..«4uds.,�:+,,..,Mt:.Cr:.2,...':�,.:+.rwi w,«r,..,:+.:.ai.,;.«,a.i.,irr as , 1' , 1 ± ■ 2 I' , 1 ' I ,o,, I , r J I n a r h 1 u• 1 41 I I , I ,. Y it • • ';:r M AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING . STATE OF OREGON ) • County of Washington ) ss 1 r City of Tigard ) .1, x, , being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath • depose and say: (Please print) 1. That I am a ( �.�� JUL_ for The City of Tigard, Oregon. . That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: , r. `': Th *t I served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: tom"-, City of Tigard Planning Director • . . Tigard Planning Commission • Tigard Hearings Of ficr„r Tigard City Council , A copy (Public Hearing Notice/Notice of Decision) of which is attached (Marked Exhibit °►A") was mailed to each named Fprisons at the dO�.r sib shown alcit:he attached list marked' exhibit ►°E°► on the ` day of _,�"A4G " ___. 19 , , .' said notice NOTICE OF DECISION as here o ttached, was pasted ,on an appropriate i , bulletin board on the , )(JAY"' day of , 19'_° and deposited r in the United States Mail on the Q-Oir`,,,•_ day of '� ' ,4., , 19 l ,, ;A postage prepaid. 'Al‘ r, 1a ' AL{/A :..___ . ' rrepared Notice Posted (Fon: Decision Only f i `1 'ab ibed" and sworn/affirm to me on the / - " day of 6 / t"e' y, A9 NOTE.. PtBLIC OF OREGON / . My ,.flU 1isaion Expires s ! ` "° •'''4, , e....4..._ /a," 4, Ferso who delivered to POST OFFICE � b cri a s 'bed and sworn/affir i to file on the 1 day of .�..,, _., ' ' 1 � citMOIALSEAL „, NOTARY PUOL.IC OrtEGO I No Y U$I; C 'ter GQ ClNl�IIIIICfP��IO1pE1 My Co ssion Expires a r E MY COMMISSIt N EXPIt E; NIA'6i 1905 1 V. blcm/ FFIDA B f ■ * I k 1 N ^y u,L {1'�-.1 ,. , „,.,.....,1,.,.-.1 _.•_ ,.,.•., ...._ I.:,• .• _.,,,.w.,,.,..,.,•,,.,.•,•.,.., ...•.•.,...., .....,._..�. .,. ,fl..«..,'... .•..........isl.•,_I. ._....., ,,..,«„1 .,«._.... ..;,a,'...«,1.1,.«.......,.,M...,«m•,..,,,.. «„ ...,.•,•,,,»....•...... .........•„ CITY 0 ` TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION :. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 91-0 010`' I • • . r WATSON, OWNER/APPLICANT, APPLICATION: A request for Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of a seven unit ' apartment complex on an ,approximately 0.61 acre sited Zoning: R-12 (Residential, 12 units per acre),' Location: 9475 SW Lehmann Street c'WCTM, 1S1 26DC, tax : lot 1000y. The R-12 zoning designation provides for single-family, duplex, and multiple-family residential dwellings, mobile home parks and subdivisions, public support services and residential ' treatment homes among other uses. Additionally, religious assembly, scholls, , parking facilities and hospitals are among the conditional uses . which are possible in this zoning district. • ' I ' , 1 <„,,%,u S,W,. Cbt�RCRST ,. , ,. . __ i '''''''t.r.,.........1,,..„.„...„ j■,,....g, ill , :.:, J 1 r-------- . .. .. . s.h . •,•..... NH ...... , , , . . .i. ,.. —,—L ......_. ..„. , 1 , ''----------...„.' ......., SSW. Ill ad n OE ,..,,.•.••. ,.L.•..,,I 1, , • / —74„...,_, , „ _ , CRESCENT,EEGROVE ., = ,.g, ,i,irci,ii;?;,,ii. • r IIN I 1,.I' , II — ..- IV1 `�' RYw = - o 1,,,11,,1j11,L.iEH MANN„„„,,„,, , i,i''i, ,i, li, a ,... 4 II w w 0 '• ',. II ' SW ., . Cs71 . Ill 00AL. Mill h ' ' . II , , .,. ,. •' I ..»..w�..w..w»;r.�+.......a ..i.J..�41tw.r.rw.�r.�»....�.wJ '111111 ' NO 1 - .• ., ., „•i . , , . , . . ., , , , 1, , ,„ . , , , , „ , , , ,NOTIC�1' OF, DECISION :.r SIR �1--n010 '°” WIZ' i0 p;1 1 J• ri I .t I 1 SECTION I-DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director's designee for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section II: BUILDING PERMITS WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL THE CONDITIONS LISTED BELOW ARE SATISFIED. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, PLEASE CONTACT RON p POMEROY IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT 639-4171. . • 4a 1. A revised site plan shall be submitted to the Planning Division for approval which provides for one disabled person parking space and two bicycle parking spaces. 2. A. protective barrier shall be installed around the two large Monkey Puzzle trees on this site. This barrier shall Ar protect against collision and soil compaction during the construction phase of this development. OCCUPANCY PERMITS WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL THE CONDITIONS LISTED BELOW ARE SATISFIED OR AN ACCEPTABLE PERFORMANCE ASSURANCE IS POSTED. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, PLEASE CONTACT CHRIS DAVIES IN THE , ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AT 639-417.1. '. 3 An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public im roiement drawings. This plan shall conform to "Erosion Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, November 1989 . " 4 #411 The applicant shall demonstrate that storm drainage runoff g, • can be discharged into the existing drainageways without significantly impacting properties downstream. e Storm drainage details shall be provided as part of the a public improvement plans. Calculations and a topographic p map of the storm drainage basin area shall be provided as a ' supplement to the public improvement plans. Calculations shall he based on full development of the serviceable area. The location and capacity of existing, proposed, and future lines shall be addressed. • ' 1✓ p .A grading plan st:all be submitted showing the existing and proposed contours r including elevations at the corners of the lot and at the four (4) corners of the building tied to the top of curb elevations as shown on the public improvement plans . p% 17 Standard half-street improvements, iniiluding concrete sidewalk, driveway P ron r curb, asphaltic concrete a pavement sanitary sewer, storm drainage, streetlights, and d undergro und utilities shall be Installed along the S.W. Lehmann frontag elr Improvements shall be designed and , constructed to Local street standards and shall conform to , r NOTICE Or DECISION -- SDR 91-0010 - WATSON ' PAGE 2 � . i I r1 J^ n ..,.,.J,i.H...w,.... ...._.,...,..._ ..«. M..».i.,.,.,.J,... ..�.. ,'.w..,...,... ._,..»,C.«,. ..,...-.,w.,,.,,.ax..m....»,...,.-.,,-+,..,.......,„w.,-,,,,. +-......«........r ..µu_..r,-.,...».+..:.y.....;..+..M.:. ..w..,.,. .;.L....«4+'. ..:w.. '.. r .,,. ....,.. y • r+.j.Wi-«hr art'1.....:«':+w..i».,...al.1w.,».'J..ib..:,.+a.w...w,:,7u+- .J:2..'...o-.r._.M,,,.:.3..,-...,..,w.,.✓«w J +..,.:. e w the alignment of existing adjacent improvements or to an 1'; ' alignment approved by the Engineering Department. is All landscape znateria .s, site improvements and required lled as per the approved site plan. STAFF CONTACT: Ron Pomeroy, Planning Division, f: 639-4171. 11(,, 4F Fire Hydrants are required within 250 feet of all portions of the structure measured around the outside and along all access roadways. Location approval will be coordinated with Tigard Water District. STAFF CONTACT: Gene Birchen, Tualatin Valley Fire District, 526-2502 IN ADDITION, THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, PLEASE CONTACT CHRI$jkVIES IN THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AT 639-4171. ,' 1. AND 1 SECTION�' BONDING i�f .�. TJR�ICE , ►� � za a.8. �.,z o a 6 0 �� ASSURANCES A. On all projects where ublic improvements are required the Director shall: 1. Require a bond in an amount not greater than 100 percent of other adequate assurances as a condition of approval of the site development plan in order to ensure the completed project is in conformance with the approved plan; and 2. Approve and release such bonds. B. The bond shall be released when the 'Director finds the completed project conforms to the approved site development plan and all conditions of approval are satisfied. 2. €�. �,6� STREET AND z SECTION 1 w►. UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS A 18.164.030 Streets 1, No development shall occur unless the development has frontage or approved access to a public street. 2 . Future Extensions of St reets and Reserve Strips: k. I a. dedicated street strip shall be the end of a ors deeded to the city: and b. A, barricade shall be constructed at the end of the Street the e p ropertyowners which o NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR �1 q 1 WATSON • .i r .r _ qw.... , .ml.,.(.q a,-.s....w....-+4...m....- .r,,.... ,..:I...l.a r w.. ,-IJ.,.. -.. .V»...w.....w.nl..,.,.lrw,..r...n.x..K».,......,. ....-».+...'................/,-H,...L..wrrAnm.+.emrv•.*-w,..,W.,'.1Th,:...W..,-.l..:I..a..M..:A.+W M...n..,.....a n..r+r:W..:...+A...:w......I....+L{.,,.,.iML......w,-,.wHxW.I+,m.Aa .:,iV M'.n>n.+M:.n M+' I i ♦w,nN.vJ. ' .,I ' shall not be removed until authorized by the City Engineer, the cost of which shall be , included in the street construction cost. The City shall install all street signs, relative J to traffic control and street names, as specified by the City Engineer for any development. The cost of signs shall be the responsibility of the developer. • 4. Street Cross Sections: • a. Surface material shall be of Class C or B asphaltic concrete; b. The final lift shall be placed on all new construction roadways prior to City final acceptance of the roadway; however, not before 90 percent of the structures in the , new development are completed unless three :, . years have elapsed since initiation of construction in the development c. The final lift shall be Class B asphaltic concrete'. as defined by A..P.W.A. standard specification d. No lift shall be less than 1-1/2 inches in thickness r B. 18. 164. 120 Utilities 1. All utility lines including, but not limited to ' those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, ,., except fo~ surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which r ma � be placed above round temporary utility ` service facilities during construction, high �,. capacity electric linos operating at 50,000 volts r r, or above. C. 18. 164. 130 Cash o% Bond Required .. 1. All improvements installed by the subdivider be guaranteed t shall g hteed alto workmanship and material for a period of' one year following acceptance by the Cit Council. ■ NOTICE Cr D ECISION - SDP. 91-0010 - WATSON PAGE 4 A • (44, �' m 2N Such guarantee shall be secured by cash deposit or bond in the amount of the value of the improvements as set by the City Engineer. : 3. The Cash or bond shall comply with the terms and ' .. conditions of Section 18. 160. 180. D. 18. 164. 150 Installation: Prerequisite/Permit Fee 1. No land division improvements, including sanitary sewers, storm sewers, streets, sidewalks, curbs, lighting or other requirements shall be undertaken except after the plans therefor have been approved by the City, permit fee paid and permit issued. E. 18. 164 . 180 Notice to City Required 1. Work shall not begin until the City has been t notified in advance. ' I 2 . If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be .resumed until the City is ' notified. F. 18. 164.200 Engineer's Certification Required f 1. The land divider's engineer shall provide written •M certification of a farm provided by the City that all improvements, workmanship and materials are o in accord with current and standard engineering and construction practices, and, are of high grade, prior the City acceptance of the . subdivision's improvements or any portion thereof for operation and maintenance . 3. A tree removal permit must be obtained from the Planning Department prior to the removal of any tree on the site { ' which is greater than 6' inches in diameter when measured at four feet from grade. STAFF CONTACT: Victor A.donr.i r Planning Department, 639-4171 4. Sign permits are require d prior to the inst allati o n of any I , sign of the site. be o g � Sa.gn. permits may be obtained through the , Planning Dep STAFF CONTACT: 'Victor Adonr i, Planning ning Department, 639-4171. SECTION II ..Y FINDINGS OF FACT s 1. Background The subject Site was platted on April 18, 1508 as part of the Lehmann Acres Tract This parcelI • M was arinexed into the •• NOTICE Or DECISION A DR J 1-o©1O - WATSON PAGE 5 I _`d}•' • • r I I i • /- , City on April 16, 1987 (BC 2344) . No other land use or development applications for this parcel have been reviewed by the City of Tigard. 2. Vicinity Information The subject parcel is bordered on the north and west by properties which are zoned R-12 (Residential, 12 units per acre) . The property to the north is developed with the Gethsemane Evangelical Lutheran Church. The property to the south and across SW Lehmann Street is zoned C-P (Commercial Professional) and is developed with the Cascade Business Center. Properties located to the east and southeast are zoned R-4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units per acre) . 3. Site Information and Proposal Description The site is presently developed with one single-family residential home. The garage which serves this residence is 1octed along the SW Lehmann Street. frontage. A second garage is located further to the east. There are a variety of deciduous trees and shrubs on the site. Of particular notice are two large Monkey Puzzle trees which are located near the site's road frontage. The applicant requests Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of a seven unit apartment building on an approximately 0.61 acre site. This development is proposed to provide parking located along the western portion of the site. 4 . Agency and NPO Comments The Engineering Division has reviewed the request and provides the following comments: 1. S'PREETS: Access to the site is provided from S.W. Lehmann, which is classified as a local street. Currently, there is a 60 foot right-of-way that fronts the development whereas local 6 street standards require 50 feet of right-of-way. Therefore, no additional sight-of-way iS required. The existing street is a mixture of improvements. Adjacent to the site and along the north side of S.W. Lehmann there is an approximately 12 feet wide pavement strip. There no other improvements along this section. On the south side of S.W. Lehmann and for a distance of approximately 250 feet, he are half-street improvements including pavement, curb and sidewalk. For the remaining frontage along the south side, an approximately 12 foot strip is paved, with no other NOTICE OP DECISION 8DR 91-0010 - WATSON PACE ' . o , - • ' • . improvements. Therefore , the applicant should be required to install half-street improvements for the north side of SW Lehmann Street along the frontage of this development site. 2 . SANI TARY SEWER: , There is an existing 8 inch sanity sewer .line located within S.W. Lehmann Street. It appears that this line has the capacity to handle this development. Therefore, the applicant should be required to connect to the existing - sanity sewer system. 3. STORM SEWER: After reviewing the storm sewer system maps it was not readily apparent if there is an existing storm system that could serve this development. There are two systems within the vicinity of this development; A) The system which is located in S.W. Greenburg Road appears to be at to high an elevation for connection to be feasible; B) The second system is located adjacent to this development: There is a catch basin on the south side of S.W. Lehmann with a 12 inch pipe which then runs . south to S.W. Coral and into another catch basin with a exit pipe that appears to be 18 or 24 inches in . ��'• diameter. It appears that this system may work however there may be a couple of complications: (1) The elevation may be too high; and ( . (2) • after tracing the system it appears the , 18/24 inch pipe is connected to a 12 inch , Pipe which then goes into an open ditch. �.. The remaining downstream system is a mixture " of open ditch and culverts for the driveways, and appears to flatten .out with no outlet within the vicinity of S.W. 92nd A' . . and SW Coral Street. y Therefore e t he applicant should be required to verify that the existing sys��x�, has development that .would use ,this � , h s the ca acit to hand. this and. all future.t 5 determined t " i ha,, . • t the system is l snsers pp should be required to improve :• . y p ogre the system to able to meet the future needs of the y area. ° Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments 0 NOTICE F DECISION y 0 E 7 -.•„ ' o • • Fire hydrants are required within 250 feet of all portions of the structure measured around the outside and along access roadways. Location approval will be coordinated with Tualatin Valley Water lAstrict. Neighborhood Planning Organization #8 has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: NPO 8 suggests that no wood stoves be permitted within this development. The NPO also voiced concerns regarding the height and size of the residential units. Tualatin Valley Water District has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: The water main shown on plan is on the south side of Lehmann Street. General Telephone has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: The developer should contact GTE Engineering Office for requirements. Allow 45 days lead time from completion 4 of GTE Engineering review to trench open date. The City of Tigard Building Division, Portland General Electric and Tigard-Tualatin School District 23j have reviewed this proposal and have issued no comments or objections. ° No other comments have been received. C. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION Section 18 .54 .050(A) (4) of the Community Development Code (CDC) allows a maximum building height of 35 feet. The submitted elevation drawings show that the apartments are planned to be approximately 24 feet in height. Therefore, thiS proposed building height is viithin guidelines of this • code requirement. Section 18.54 .050 of the R-12 zoning district regulations • requires minimum setbacks for multiple-family dwellings as follows: front yard - 20 feet, rear and setback - 20 feet, garage - 20 feet, side yard -10 feet. This side yard of rear yard setback shall be a minimum of 30 feet when this site abuts a more restrictive zoning district. This proposal complies with the 1 -12 requirements for the front yard, garage and rear yard setbacks. The east side of this site abuts an R-415 zoning district and therefore shall • NOTICE or DECISION - SDR 91-0010 - WATSON RAGE 8 ,47 .... ._-,-•..._,...,•.'..... ..a......_t- r,'..w..rl.. :.._nr,il. _i.-.a..r......_.., _.u..uA. .r,..1 a....."aa_.. _.,,,..1..,....a...._..rra...s..w......1.n._.n.II'n.u._._.aan...r..... ......_.. ..,a...-.nn..w........1.................n 1...-.. ...._.u.....141 w. ....r._,. ._r.a.n.. 1. v tutr.l x be required to maintain a 30 foot side yard setback. The r•. submitted site plan shows a side yard setback of 24 feet on • the east side. Code section 18.120. 170(A) (Exception to Standards) states that the director may grant an exception to the setback requirements based on findings that the approval will result in the following: 1) An exception which is not greater than 20 percent; 2) no adverse effect to adjoining properties in terms of light, noise levels, and fire hazard; 3) safe vehicular and, pedestrian access to the • ;1; site as well as on-site: 4) a more efficient use of the site which would result in more landscaping; and 5) the preservation of natural features which have been incorporated into the overall design of the project. With reference to the above criteria, staff finds the following: 1) The reduction of the required 30 foot side • yard setback to 24 feet is not greater than a 20 percent; 2) granting this setback reduction will not create adverse effects on adjoining properties in terms of light, noise levels, or fire hazard; 3) this exception will not compromise safe vehicular or pedestrian access either to the site or on-site; 4) this exception will produce a more efficient use of the site than the alternative of flipping the apartments to the other side of the site. Reversing the site plan would reduce the side yard setback requirement to a 10 feet for each side of the site. Therefore, the parking lot may be located 10 feet from the R-4.5 parcel to the east with the apartments being located 10 feet from the property to the west and therefore reduce the amount of on-site landscaping. Granting this exception would preserve a •. greater amount of landscaping as well as providing a greater distance between this development and the adjoining R-4.5 ` zoning district; and 5) granting this exception would help b . to preserve the two large Monkey Puzzle trees which are located between the proposed driveway access and the southern lost apartment. Therefore, Staff grants an exception to the eastern side yard setback to 24 feet whereas the code requires 30 feet. Subsequently, code section 18.54.050 is satisfied. Section 18. 106 . 030 A 4 c (Minimum off--street parking requirements - Multiple Dwelling) requires two parking spaces for each dwelling unit if there are more than two bedrooms per unit. The preliminary plans show that each unit shall contain three bedrooms pet unit. Therefore, it vehicular p dwelling units. The site plan provided for the seven of 14 �� u.�.ar p ng "s spaces is required' that a minimum o parking n d g p an provides for 17 parking spaces; a one car garage on the ground floor of each unit y` plus }te'n (10)site uncovered parking lot spaces. Therefore the preliminary site plan meets the number of parking spaces i requited to satisfy the Code . .. requirements . r - • . PACE 9" • 91-0010 WATSON NOTICE o� DECISION SDR ��-•too P n, I , . t State of Oregon House Bill 2084, which became effective September 1, 1990, requires one disabled person parking spaces if 6 to 25 parking spaces, are provided. The proposed plan does not provide for the one disabled person parking ! space which is required. Therefore, a revised site plan �.--'"�� • should be submitted which addresses this requirement. Code Section 18. 106 .020 (1') requires one bicycle parking space for each 15 vehicle parking spaces in any development. Since there are 17 parking spaces to be provided on this site, two bicycle parking spaces are required. The site ; lan does not indicate the location of any bicycle parking plan on this site. Therefore, a revised site plan " " should be submitted which addresses this requirement. The site meets the minimum access standards through the provision of one 24 foot wide access driveway from SW Lehmann Street. Code Section 18 . 108.070(D) requires that a multi-family development with a parking area providing between 3 and 19 parking spaces be provided with an access drive with a minimum access width of 30 feet. The accessway I .. must be paved to a minimum width of 24 feet. The applicant is proposing a paved 24 foot wide paved accessway and therefore satisfies this access requirement. Code Section 18.108.050 requires that within all multi- ' developments, each residential dwelling units shall �, :' • be connected to the parking area by a walkway system having a minimum width of four feet and constructed of an all weather material. The proposed site plall indicates that pedestrian access to the parking area will be provided in that the front of each individual apartment opens onto the parking area. Therefore, this code requirement has been . satisfied. Code Section 10. 100 . 110 (Screening: Special Provisions) states that trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed and on the basis on one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. There are seventeen parking spaces provided on this site, and there are seven trees indica.ted near the parking lot on the preJ.iminary site plan. Therefore, this code requirement has been surpassed Multiple family developments within the 11-12 zoning district t are re ed to rovide a minimum of , laindsca in' r�uir p p, g on the site. The submitted landscape plan indicates a landscaped area which greatly excess 2 0 % requirement', . are 'ch �is g'r y a�n ss� of this � Therefore this code requirement has been satisfied. Section 18, 102 (Visual Clearance Areas) requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all NOTICE OF DECISION SIDR 91-0010 - WATSON PAC8 10 { . I property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction I exceeding 3 feet in height, except that obstructions which ll may be located in this area shall be visually clear between p' 3 and 8 feet in height. Visual clearance areas shall b e � ° that triangular area formed by measuring a 30 foot distance along each of the right-of-way Hor property lines and then e connecting these two 30 foot distance points with a straight conforms with all visual . . � line. The proposed development conf clearance requirements of this code section. Chapter 18. 150 requires a 'permit and contains standards for removal of trees having a trunk 6 inches or more in diameter 1 four feet a bo ve the ground rid on undeveloped ed la rid. A permit for tree removal must comply with the following criteria: a. The trees are diseased, present a danger to L : y 1 property, or interfere with utility service or traffic safety; b. The trees have to be removed to construct proposed improvements or to otherwise utilize the applicant's property in a reasonable manner; s are not needed to prevent erosion c. Th,e, trees a p � instability, or drainage problems; d. The trees , are not needed to protect nearby trees as windbreaks or as a desirable balance between shade and open space; e. The aesthetic character in the area will not be visually adversely affected by the tree removal; and I I f, New vegetation e ta t�on planted by the applicant,cant r if any, will replace the aesthetic value of trees to be cut. The preliminary site plan shows that two large mature Monkey Puzzle trees are located to the east of the proposed driveway access and that these t shall be preserved as part of the landscaping requirement. No tree remova l shall be allowed to occur p rior to Plann ing Division staff review and approval of a removal permit. NOTICE Or DECIS/ON SDR 91-0010 - WATSON PAOE 11 , I b r 4° 4.1' J4...v.ti. 4 i Z '•" DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director's S !,. +� designee for the City of Tigard has APPROVED Site Development 0 : Review SDR 91 -001.0 subject to the conditions listed in Section I. THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE FINAL DECISION DATE NOTED BELOW. D. PROCEDURE ! 1 1• Notice: • ' .. �, Notice was published in the newspaper, ' at. City Hall and mailed to: )(The applicant and owners )4, Owners of record within the required distance The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization °:- '74 Affected, government agencies 2. Final Decision: THE DECISION SI LL BE FINAL ON 10/30/91 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 3. .Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this ,decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the. Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with ` the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. Appeal fee schedule and forms are available at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3: 30 p.m. 19/30/91. 4 . Questions: If you have questions, please call City of Tigard Planning Departmente City of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon. PREPARED BY: Ron Pomeroy D ATE Assistant Planner APPROVED BY: Dick Be erSdorff DATE R Senior Planner rp/SDR91-10.DEC • • I NOTICE OF DECISION rszoN SDI 91-0010 WATSON PAGE l2 I I I • • II , • • • • • n - , 1 '.F _•lw 1%L1 ..,,..-.W:.' .,.._... ,. . _ ', µ µ, .�L 1 V�7 Y� lJ C'L''l:.�A. u.t\ ' , 95215 SW 92ND AVE PORTLAND OR 97201 . ' PORTLAND • 'OR 97223 ' . . x . 1S126DC-00901 •. e„ ..'.•. .. . , .•..e •• ' 1S12617C-01001 '' •w '' ... .GETHSEMANE' EVANGELICAL ' VAN SARAN, RAYMOND H & MARY M . LUTHERAN CHURCH I % CUNDARI, GERALD F & DEANNA. L • ' 9640 'SW GREENBURG AD ' 3220 SW FAIRMOUNT BLVD PORTLAND ,OR. 97223 . 1' 1 PORTLAND OR .97201 �, - cf 1S 126DC—01002 ......•••e.••+•eee•o• 1S126DC^01 03 . AVAST, ANG LINE V 1 ZOOK, DARRELL F, SHIRLEY 9355 SW I,EHMAN 9415 SW LEHMAN . ' ' PORTLAND.' ORTLAND OR 97223 PORTLAND )R 97223 I . 1S126D'C-01004 .•.....••e'..'. ..•••••. ', 1S126DC-01006 `' AGUN', DANIEL ALICE F ' ' WELCH, MARTIN JAMES ' 9445 SW LEHMAN BY FAR WEST LANDSCAPING INC , ' •' ' ' PORTLAND 'OR 97223 ' 19022—A SW DIPOLE RD 1 ' , ' ' ' ' " ' ' r ''TUALATIN ' OR 97062 , i . ... 00 /� 15126DC-032 IJ 5 .0 •• •o 1.S126DC Ol 0 ' THOMAS, BARRY J/IRENE T ERICKSON, ODD X ARMS R ' \. , I 15510 NW NORWICH'. CIRCLE PO BOX 881 , BEAVERTON OR 9700,6 . GARI BALD I OR, ' 97118 '. , ' ' . - 15126DC-03100 ..• ....'.I.'.a.'.',,.•..•• 15126DC--03301 ' WATSON, JAMES LIE CROFT, LESTER R AND Z RUTH ' ' • • 30. AUL'ZK,E ST S 305 2025 SW BROADLEAF DR KAILUA ' ' HI'96734 PORTLAND OR 97219 ' 1S126D0-03302 ....e • . .• 1S126DC-03500 •......e..•.........• 111. . k MURRAY, DOUGLAS J ' ' MORROW, KENNETH C„ AUDREY iYm TILLIE A 9411 SW CORAL ' 1' - '" 9450 SW LEHMAN PORTLAND OR 97223 ' II , PORTLAND, OR 97.223 ff 12 6C0--01900 ry pry {� .. ..''. ".' 1S r 1S s.6DC^03600 e.•wwsr••♦••s � „n . HANSEN, MELVIN .L::JUNE A CRESCENT GROVE ERY ASS I 9395 SW CORAL CRESCENT GRO EMETI RY ' ' PORTLAND OR 91223' 000 1 6 C AMES T�IFBE 1 WATSON' 1240 MOR'UTLUA DR . RAILUA, HAWAII ' 96734 1 GA'IHY CHASE I 8365 'SW 'STII1LD TIGARDi OR 97223 ' I . u or . . , : . : . , ,. " . : ., ,. . .. . . .. . . . •, . ,, , . . . „ . . ... . ., . . . , . . ., ,, .. . ,... . . • . , , . . . . , , . . . ., . ',,,,,,, .. ••• , .. ... , ., . ..., .. .. - . '..,. , . , ' . i. „ . „ r . . • , • - -• ... " s P I 1 . .. . . , �. �' COMMUNITY NEWSPAP ERS RS INC. .• • P.O,Box 370 � � PHONE(503)6134.0360 Notice TT 7074 • ' BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 + Legal Notice Adverti&Bng o City of Tigard 0 C7 Tearsheet Notice PO Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 ° d Duplicate Affidavit b VTE,t3EVELOPMFN` REVIEW Spit,¶1 0010 ATS•Oj JND,#,$))' T1ie Directo'r';�iads approved .r;ublec"t tts:coaditions;,,a taqucs �fot,Sate be,ielophiertf R-eysewapprv+ai to cons2trudta seen-unit dp mentcomw , ple on 0,6k•:ac site O E�R 1 .(Resi den ia1,1'2 units�acd) he ,, 'R-12*ling'designation provides•for,single,fat uIy,dupiec y,kmr*ri mu1 is ti�;. . ptc falinityresiddntis.l;dwelhxg i rhobile homy✓.:p*t,,,$uhdtvhsigsi,piib1>,e,,:' . AFFIDA,'VIT:OF PUBLICATION •s�rppot't''ez iec,,:and resideaiitisi'tzeatrixertt borpcs*song othdlr•s$es�AddcM STATE OF OREGON, tiinnally tcligi,ots 1is;3**."3dhoolMi parlci0tfaci i,00s.,and,hospital at'e COUNTY OF W GON,lt3TON, ) amntlggthe eondrtion i,uses which Ri o possible in this zonitDg distrit t i.�JCa4T�Tb 9475 ; Ldni�iann txeet t;R'CTNi 3S 1 2O'DC,tax,lvt' I, Judith Koehler 1000) being first duly sworn,depoce and sa that I the Advertising ri .-- .4,�� "- 'l_''' ''' ' IS-. — - L • r Director,or his principal clerk,of the ' gardaimes „ „, �' a news a er of general airy -1 p P g ai tion s definer! in ORS 193.010 H, ,�,, .,,,,,r , - end 193.020;published at 1.garat e irk i in the :i� L,,-,�=�w ,..:.� •N _„ ,• efts said,coUn ands t�lhet bite evelo b Watson �{ ° a printed copy of which is hereto annexed,Was published in the : `" 1'. entire issue of said newsy a or for e , P P _ u�,vessivo and �.. ! . consecutive In the following IssUes; 10I N , a; 4� . October �� ' f�lw �"l 9 • 1111111111 „. ' i �, 141' l' ,/ I y b sc Nt t :o r u uubscr ibed I I i� 0: 4,...r.:::,..8.,, ,:: S and sworn to betore me this 17th day of October .i r,� ' � 11 i W MN'g IN �L.II� f"I �, �� w:,,,,_,,..„4„,---4,—,...._., , ,, „ TIT—Li:I-A .::: ..: :, ,,,,, , , l Notary Public for Oregon' LSIT1 DE'V"11i 60,1'vffNtF P.LVSE , SDR•91,OO1,1 ■ My,con'itnission tkpir©s, .., /...ti—,, ,199 G k i?OJBC','1"MAN EMI✓N'i'C�Irt7Ut� (l '0'; y,, . Phe p,zree,tat h'ti's approved,litlbjet t to tin�itsbfis,'ti r6,4itest.tet. to,' AFFIDAVIT l�evciopment geviaw to atit)w cQnst+rUction.o..a 1.5,7 O tiu ,'ti foot twa• ' ghity off ee bu ldiR i,with parking spares,2014tf ..P ,refer;:gla4411 'tiro I „ iietciai 'LOCO ;ON+"9X7 A,AY, ,004fittzg,iZoat (W'C2M IS!2(DC1!„ tic It�tfiiyl). . { .: Y0 , 'k. , ''''kt, rF �� I111"` x. 111 • We oauO I '`11 Ii a g I�:,fatU 1 riiiimeN w N N. / h,, "" Nis " " �� i'li adopteri iiiidiiig o th'at,,.:t1c *ion,iiitd s to ent1ox:btiditu$i t aoo tab. ' tibteiried&rotpt Ilia Pltynnin ,De' :rtreant;h�`1gnrd Civic:CiOrit i:51, 5,N 'f ,,,M411:„drt'd i 1,Og•$ry>t ,g91,T;1g'srd,Or`o cn 97123,Ttte tie l8[on s 1t be 110th on, tobor`30,'1.9! .1,AiiY psfty to.th6.daaisabzi oui, ;try .414 this .,; srclsioi in a ce dtittee With$ tkn 132 2 0(A ari cuori i � 0� ' pt fhb Ooritiniiiii4i I,OVelopi9nt codh,`*hIvi Otavidds tat a% tte p' peitht w be kwlth i 1 t dsy�s t tdt hotr , s.gt'veit anti Ber t,;i a odttdu, , ' iiite i`lliinl;t�(sitt h enf�;'$*0 P., �;,De�2liii�r3D "ti;., % ' • '' `Jb4' 'uhlifi�,+ i4,1'�� "�. ', 1, - k • • • • i • • i 1 , COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS 'INC� � �e s al 1 . , P,O,BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 Notice TT 7074 1 BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising 1 a City of Tigard " Ci Tearsheet Notice . PO Box 23397 e Tigard, OR 97223 0 CD Duplicate„Affidavit Tw._.: .., �, SiTE DEVELOPMENT'REVIEW;5,,U1t_91-0010 WATSON �t3#x), e The Director has approved,subject to conditions,a request for site x, . Development'Revie'w approval to construct a seven-gilt apartment cam telex on a 0,61-acre site ZONE:R.1.2(Resid¢ntia1,12 ufitS/acre).The . ;R-12 zoning desigrtation provi des for single-fatuity,,duplex,and multi , . ple-faMily residential dwellings,mobile hohe arks,subdivisions,p ublic ` AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION ,support services,and residential treatment hoines amo11g other uses,Addi 1 STATE OF OREGON, tiohally,religious assembly,schools,parking facilities,and hospiwls are 1' ; COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )6. 'trnorig.the conditional uses'which ate possible in this zoning district, LOCATION.9475 S.W.T ehmann Street(1WC`pM 1S1 26DC,tax'lot , h_Judith Koehler being first duly sworn,depose and saW;#hat I {�the Advertising `. 1 arda�irrles `� "�tt �' Director,'or his principal clerk,of the ' g �� rT — (• � , . , we. , , . a newspaper of general circ ties s defined in ORS 193,010 `^, , oconn yid f•• and 193.020;published at igaru in'the 1., mow.:. ..,-- --- "`:. , rlfo said and stat 1 [ 'lJ bite Development Vi-Uul Watson ; ' ::'' "5 -- a printed copy of which is hereto annexed,was'published in the n ( '' t �"`�, entire issue of said newspaper for One successive and consecuf�+,.in the following Issues: I�7ph! 1 f�1, ' October 17, 1991 . , 1 N DI nowot 1 ,,- } I k :csNT 0110Vti i Ala i -'!/' '�� I �' 1 +.dth1iEERY' to �� 11 �yw I i d., Subscribed and sworn to before me this, 1.,_. ' 4- �' I. - 1®6 mi*n;A mu ' ■ . `� 17th day of t7taober y 1 , '( �� ' � �'��,w. cgs: Notary public for Oregon ,S1'rE DEVELOPMENT REyIEW SDR r 91-0011 . • . My Commission Expires: �'R �'T ANAGEMENT�'QRQ , '' (1,4P0,#8) AFFIDAVIT The Director has approved;'subject to'conditions,a request for-Site i, Deyelop,hentRevieW to alloW;'construetion'or a 15,75u.square foot.two. story office building with parking spaces.ZONE:C P:(Profcssiohat Corn • ipreii`ily,LOCH TJON�'9910.$;1W GredrlhJrg'Road(WC'TM ISi 260C, ,'' lot�46Ol) ''; ' 1 i �.4d vi „ii , I11�Y! � m ow bw,o®N if iamb i4 t . itAt, :"":""": 7.7,4 13 ,, al Ali , IILLIt,i: .WWT' GROVE' Ill � N OMN i ' �; • ' I ■ 1Ul 1 n ,W ,, 1 z a i'NM M ®1 iffiek , its; �n ''� l-� -- IJII r I � �i �` ! � .v fir % , .?+ or 1 the adopted finding of fact.S,deeisiotl,And Statenient of conditions can:he '1u�. obtained from the Planning De arttrlent,Tigard Civic'Center,'13125 S W I'r ' Hall Blvd,P.O.Box 23397,Tigard, Oregon 97123.The decision shall be ' Axial on Ogtoher 30,1091,Any party to the decision May'appeal this deeistoe in aeaordanse.with Set 01 18. 2,290CA)and Sect on'1=8,32.370 of Met oInnrhr ii1Y Development Code,Which,provides that-ti Writtet a p „: peal may bC filed wi t in 1 days t ter rtl ti te��,icn and sent:`lir d ea d.' iline for filing of tin appeal is 3,30„ 1vM,;0gb r•3b,1gg , ' �.- rr7p7d Publish October 17,1,99 • Aa + �” . , • • • II Ciii OF TIGARD OREGON •' 1' SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATIOrd_ � CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639--4171 FOR, STAFF USE ONLY ;. CASE OTHER CASE NO'S: RECEIPT NO. • APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: \M--- DATE: ` - 7 la GENERAL INFORMATION Application elements submitted: ' ,PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION 9475 SW LEHMANN, TIGARD, . , "A) •Application form (1) OREGON 97223 /"�CB) Owner's signature/written ! . i„ • • TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO. 1S126DC--01 O00 authorization (C) T - --t-ransfe- -tn,stzume (1) SITE SIZE ,' LOTS 3 & 4, BLOCK "I -LEHMANN ACRE TRACTS (D).. s- r !s-mts (1) PROPERTY OWNER./DEED HOLDERS m AmON (E) Plot plan (pre-app checklist) ADDRESS 1240 MOKUL UA DRIVE PHONE(808)262-8144 ( ) Applicant's statement CITY KAILUA, HAWAII 31P 96734 (pre-app checklist:) APPLICANT* SAME (G) h, s: - -•Fraopert-y-o , smani- a ADDRESS � � � �� PHONE � � � � � � �addresses within 250 feet (l) CITY ZIP (H) Filing tee (t r / ) *Then the owner and the a. . licant are different '" ('Z} Construction Cost 'Estimate: people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record o a leasee in possession with written authorization DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE: . .I from the owner or an agent of the owner with written . authorization, The owners) must sign this application ire. the space provided on page two or FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: submit a written authorization with this application. COMP. PLAN/ZONE DESIGNATION: 2. PROPOSAL SUMMAI.Y t a,a r The owners of record of the subject property roquest site development review approval to N.P.O. Number: allow 7 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX ,Approval Data: Final Appro el Date: Planning Engineering , • __: 0524P/13P Rev'a 5/87 .4 3. List. any variance, conditional use, sensitive lands, or other land use actions • to be considered as part of this application: 4. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. 5. THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The e'1ove recLu�st does not violate any deed restrictions that niay be attached «:to or imposed n2on .the subject property. B. If the. application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights ',granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. C. AU of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based, on this application, may be revoked if it is found 'ehat any such statements are false. . , 4 D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. DATED this 8TH day of AUGUST 191 SIGNATURES of each owner (eg 4 husband and wife) of the subject property. r , (1(SL pm/0524r) ..,..L,...........,.n.w.r»,n......-....._u..,wk..,,.....,w«..,.....d... ...._.„r,w.....r............ .......r__,.,c.. ..ru_.. .,«..a...,.�,._....,-....._«_.,..._iiw...r...,:�. ,..u.rw..,...,._-,.r.,,....ti.....,r...,u.,.....,..r.«..Nr.r...i.r,..x...x.r,..,au.-.,... :u,:....:a<:rwuar.,....::P..wr..wa o-a,._v,...w_...____- ,.,.r.:..:ala: EiVA 3230 SW UPPE "/R . . 9525 SW 92ND AVE ' ' PORTLAND O15~w,,:97201 . ' r '''' PORTLAND '. ' . 011.. 97223 ' '' ', 18126DC-00901 . .. . . . . .. .'... . . . .. . .. 1S126DC-01001 GETHSEMANE EVANGELICAL VAN SAUN, RAYMOND.H & MARY 'M • LUTHERAN 'CHURCH % CUNDARI., GERALD F & DEANNA L , 9640 SW GREENBURG RD 3220 SW FAIRMOUNT BLVD PORTLAND OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97201 �.1 S126DCp001002 d' 1S126DC-01003 .......,......... ....... ' ' 'ANAST, ANGELINE V ZOOK, DARRELL F SHIRLEY 9355 SW LEHMAN 1 9415 SW LEHMAN A ,PORTLAND OR 97223 ' I ' ' PORTLAND ' OR 97223 ' 1d5126DC-01004 -0 15126DC 1006 ' . AGUN, DANIEL ALICE F WEL C H, MARTIN DAME S 9445 SW LEHMAN ' ' r ' ' BY FAR WEST LANDSCAPING INC ' ' ' ' PORTLAND OR 97223 ' ' ' I ' 19022.-A SW CIPOLE RD ' ' ' TUALATIN OR 97062 ' 1S126DC-01005 18126D0-03200 ARDIS R REN 'T 1,. ' ERICKSON 'ODD K. THOMAS,. HARRY J I E r r 15510 NW NORWICH CIRCLE PO BOX 881 BEAVERTON OR 97006 ' ' ' . ' ' GARIBALDI OR 97118 , r ',, ' 15126DC-03300 .... .. . ..,. ' . 1S126DC-03301 ' ' WATSON, JAMES LIEBE CROFT, LESTER R AND Z RUTH ' ' 1 30'AULIKE ST STE 305 ' 2025 SW BROADLEAF DR ' KAILUA HT 96734 ' ' ' ,,,', ' ' PORTLAND OR 97219 15126DC.43302 . .' ' m . 182 1 6DC'43500' . . . MURRAY, DOUGLAS'] • • ' MORROW, KENNETH C 'AUDREY TILLIE A 9411 SW CORAL . .i/ 9450 SW LEHMAN ''' PORTLAND OR 97223 I PORTLAND OR 97223 ' 1S126DC.43600 ' 1512600-01900 . . . , , . . ,..o .,1 OANSEN, MELVIN L JUNE :k' ' CRESCENT GROVE CEMETERY 'ASS. I 9395 SW CORAL ' ' ' ' ' ' ' CRESCENT GROVE CEMETERY ' r 1 00 00 PORTLAND OR 97223 0 . • , I I Y ,V..1. v . i.b 4 ' • - a, - -��_ - _ a . -- el " / • spa _- --r- = - - s s w - Y_-1'---...-__:-__-8-11.2for E :ID - I ' I en I --_E CS. 49O - - '$ 1 — - - T _ T3 •- i _ - - t {C:S.Pia[1787 _ ',"lx,4 - .3 e- . 1. 2 ...77 h i / o0 1 - PI RST AIDDETIO�t - 1900 :-- rr��o� TO $ CRESCENT GROVE CEMETERY `e l CRESCENT GROVE'4 . - :-..t - 1 CEMETERY �, 5S i s. s SEE MAP ` *E •_f -5 ' - 88.-05 W - 446 _ an3.� !S 1 AGE Le I I- -tit $ti 'W 84- 88°05`W _ ' girl ..C.I 1 01 i '- _ r_- - _25 h_ 373.1' _% . T. . • N 89°327-117/ 8.64 CH -i.1 ,.. { 448 �_ 5 89°82`E 8 39CH ,... 448:.8` °i5 89°5l'E Ad 14 Rods 10 71* - il I C GRAHAM - I. (- _ s,,; _ _ No,o 32 . 5324. CRESCENT -. - - 8.13Cti '3 ` t- _ Pf 89°32-1�Y d.t'4 Cti• f •`yl - iii 1 .MAUSOLEUM l'GROVE, °�5 __w - 1 _ 1 l4 Rod* 11.89°92`W x.79 CH.�:8 N _ _ r 3,27C1•t. .....:....,r_ ` is . _ ' - ::,,,,-.1.,_: L t 4:T Cf LINE i'-Ant- SEE MAP • i S 1 3J SA • LI . FOR 'ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY DO i _ E .Y OIL POR ANY, {?TIER • = I tee' S E SW 1/4 r WASHINGT N COUNTY`L ORE( ._� / S 1..E 111= 100' _ 0, i r i :800 I 1 /Ac. 4 ea 902. II if /21; 2.06A c., . ' 1400 _ 45/Lr"-----...... E (C.S.No.EE585} in Ki f I j 900 ' r � . 1301 i 1.33.4c. it .405 Ac. �` E �� ill } c;f 9 _ 1300 0 - .94Ac., �� 405 Ac. o - - 1 e w \— ; 1 256.84 Q o +n ..- r a) N 45:11 0 •• / F 1201.34Ar.,, i 3 1 . . ,! 1 _.— €79.O 1t_8 9°5 8'W 557.5 ` 1 1 C$5,67581.a' ®+ -82.95 _ _ F I 86 86 80 05 1000 1004 t00 10:0t 1 iC 0 .2F_.�?w 5/Ac i :. c_ '35 etc CL----'-' �Ac 35Qc • 45tic 1102 f .16 c f _ SEE MAP` i i ' or - 'i ' N -i _�' 1 at 1 PI • J I :' OO6 i 1101 F- ir, " - -.fa`Ac_ I .16ac. f ` - • \ ..' P. EL I .1M :I 46.8' - 105 86 J_ 677 Its? S'6 86 . - ' I*O.3' I I TER4. 55t? sue'"` .d60 - } - - - a f _ • i 1101 A c.A € 06_ -/ Ac _ I I - i\il : ./(—\ ., S , 105 _ .:46-et 1 - 86. 57..7 tl8.3, 8-6 6s i Sa.3'f 60 s 39'53 E_ TERkl. 35a. • i Of C LEHMANto j N 0.R. 350 t - _ , _ - _ ` 190.3 - --1,` 3'�a 2.5 5.z' 1I�o-3f3 V200 3D e5 3302 3301 .38 c 2 A 6 c . . _ 34 A a 9 = .Q t),-, 6 .17Ac 204 t I v 30 f`' _45 5 _.0/Ac: . F r J- < f, - ° r ' er 12 2:8 2.8:` I9C.3` • m s — I 9 5 — 54 9515'_ 95.15 3500-t 3 ` 3700 3701 00 300 - °f c .39 Ac. 8 Ac- 43Ac .34Ac. -'..38Ac -4/Ac. LL I k 1 (C.S-No..J i68O) L. , ;- • 1 6 _ tt. F _ I I BEGIN. 16 3'o Y y ) o S.�I C.R. 163£.' C 0--'r L d N. 39° 28'E. - 1559.9` if _ '_ ( ' 95.15` 95.15' 40.3' 15d - 9.89°2 'W. t 1550.5 9'3�i5 t t t 4i�0!# •60 Ac_ .26Ac. 26Ac. , I 1 NI \•• '''0 9 f\ - C-'. . ,.: _, r - .f°_ 4 _- - - -- - _ - - J { ,� - i3 4600 1``- - � - � � $11 �� - Sat 79: -0.3 IT. ' 3 _ _ _ =$0 . �. 4700 4701 1` °--� 520 �. .47 Ac .,30 AC ..3�AciF�c. 2 .42 Ac: Q04 .39Ac_ 36Ac. Or y4 Ac .36Ac.. 2C}-Or 3 /7 Ac. ` No. . �. # , • {� 11444} �t• . . o= — 103 4 qt ` . 5201 Or ' I-gel OS. NI41 n h /8�@t •Ill:3-1' I 241: 9 5.15' ll . s6.tar toe 3' e r it y - T } _ - • ..•.•■••■•....lennrv.w.:�-wid.r..,,M».....,,...,.,.,k.-.,.�.4:...,,,.,,...w.....-.r..xr N,a.. :Y....a....,c,; ,,...:.u,.,...... .,«.» .,A • .:L ......,.,,.. ..«,„.a ..-.. .w..,a-.,w44140✓4 « 04.a4e.;wc. ...4.'. r t , TO: l k./V Lj�j f DATE:: September gr 1991 FROM: Tigard Planning ,Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 91-0010 WATSON (NPO #8) A request for Site Development review approval to construct a foot seven unit apartment complex on a 0.61 acre site. ZONE: R-12 (Residential, 12 units/acre) ' LOCATION: 9475 SW Lehmann Street (WCTM 1S1 26DC, tax lot 1000) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and, recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to Comment on this application, we need your comments by Sept. 1616, 1391. You • may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. you are unable to respond by the above dates please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Offer PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: eeeee x Name of Person Commen ting Phone Number: bkm/SDR91--10.1 • • • • ( , t b L• I . + NOTIFICATION LIST FOR ALL APPLICATIONS n 2 copies co P NO. NFO NO. ,( ) F , 2. CITY. DEPARTMENTS Building Official/Brad R. Parks & Recreation Board City Recorder Police ,,�,.'" Engineering/CYri� D. ,r Field Operations l Permits Coordinator/Viola G. �I rrv'. P. CC e 3. SPECIAL DISTRICTS ___ ►'''Fire District School Dist No. 48 • (Pick-up box) (Beaverton) Joy Pahl °,' PO, Box 200 1.. i Beaverton, OR 97075 .-°• Tigard Water District !0^" School Dist. 23J g' b 8777 SW Burnham St. (Tigard) Tigard,~ OR 97223 13137 SW Pacific Hwy. Tigard, OR 97223 • Metzner Water. District 6501 SW Taylors Ferry Rd. ,, Tigard, OR 97223 4. AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS Wash. Co. Land Use & Transp. _ Boundary Commission v :320 SW Stark Room 530 ';: 150 N. First Ave.. Hillsboro, OR 97124 Portland, OR 97204 �' fi Y _r _ Brent Curtis Kevin Martin METRO 1 w Obann Rice 2000 SW 1st ave. Scott King Portland, OR 97201- Fred Eberle 5398 1 • Mike Borreson w OLD (CPA's only) - City of Beaverton 1175 Court St. NE , w Jim Rendryx Salem, OR 97310-0590 PO Box 4755 Beaverton, OR 19707 6 w Other -- • State Highway Division . Lee Gunderson ' PO Box 565 o Beaverton, OR 97075 .. , 5. SPECIAL AGENCIES • jr:-.General Telephone Portland General Elec. Mike Lutz Brian Moore .. .. O is Fry • 12460 SW Main St. '� • . 1465 SW.. Old I . col Tigard, OR 97223 Beaverton, OR 97007 Gas _ __: ,Met Co ti �� JNW Natural Metro Area' mcriiiri:ica Dais )' 220 NW Seconlvi, PE; -'LS Twin Oaks Technology Ronald D . OR 09 1c15 169th Place S on;d Ave. Center � -� 0 Portland, 972 I 602 Beaverton, 0A 97006 -4886 . T t ACT Ca blevis ion of Oregon US West Mike Hallodk Pete Nelson 3500 SW Bond 421 SW Oak St. Portland, OR 97201 Portland, OR 97204 q f . I 1 ...+..i .., .. ... .- • ., „ •„ „ 4,-. I. ..,,<.-.. rnw u-.w:.:+aL...:,..:o,.:,.....ww..:.,...-,.....r.� .,.ti.+.....,.u.auU+.««.:.w..,ourJlr.,10 ._tr...::n..:.1a,'k....:.+i...,'+:d.L-ssu.,.:w..A.. c 6. STATE AGENCIES �. .. _ Aeronautics Div. (ODOT) DOGAMI Engineer Division of State Lands Board of Health Commerce Dept. d- M.H. Park Fish & Wildlife _ Parks & Recreation Div. - LCDC Subdivision Supervisor • Dept. of Energy _ PUC Dept. of Environ. Quality Fire Marshall Other 7. FEDERAL A.GENCTES Corps. of Engineers Other Post Office 8. OTHER Southern Pacific Transportation Company Duane M. Forney., PLS - Project Engineer 800 NW 6th Avenue, R. 324, Union Station Portland, OR 97209 fir. { I I I I u I I • I ,1 bkm/NOT'.I5 I I I f • I I 1' MM∎t WFh"vfin4*1...11.1∎∎+4∎∎ AaWFJM11hhVM■■ .'/MMIw,kMMIn�N/'�KrvlAl?F MY>M>+HI:M al A 1 ate,t"",Y� .i,. �t Foy W :B Ox i,J ,1NT oWu tN∎∎∎.....∎∎∎∎itNNtM∎'^ t l'M'MM/q�MMp 11Y{,�MMYYNM�NNf!.{Mnit>i' hNN 4: Iii;f,Ns, O N J . 'L4E) (10 ,0 vlh Itr i1W vTV 4�1� • N I. b jat MINUTES WEDNESDAY SEPT 11 , 1991 1• . Chairperson Chase car' d the meeting to order at 7 :40 pm. 2 . Present were: Chase, Blomgren , Epler , Haglund, ! ford, Hein , • Juv e and Stevens . d 3 3. Jim Hein said that the comment about the speed bumps.. on Hart was made by someone else. There was no verb in the second sentence, 6th paragraph (John was present at) . Cynthia moved that the Minutes of the August 14th meeting be approved as corrected. ', Marjory seconded Motion passed unanimously. 4, John called the county about the brush at Oak and Hall . John wi i l take a picture and talk to Jim Collier at the county. There have been three accidents at this corner in the past month . Trammel Crow was supposed to do a traffic study last August. John ' got a copy of the study. I t was supposed to be coordinated with the State and County. The State / County traffic study was not done, and as a result the expansion by Trammel Crow Will be delayed until next year . I Legacy Health Care is putting another building behind Lincoln „_ . Commons A two story building with parking for 170 cars is planned. The parking a:,Wea is zoned residential , They wi l l have an t o � The o en� � to 9� d' 's From 92 d they can go to Locust .n � 92nd t �r m n County will allow the parking in residential zoning. Cathy said that we would I' ve an opportunity to review this later,, that only , 20 ft of the development were in the 'City of Tigard. CPO 4 is a . • more appropriate forum for the discussion since most of the * development is in the County. SbR' 91-0010 Applicant requests Site,, Development Review approval to construct a 1 ,750 sq. ft 7 unit apartment complex. The , members had a difficult time Understanding how the apartments Were laid out, since they were can l bout 509 sq. ft.ft on the ground 14 !" ° ' . oo r . ,, - laerl~'� ".'` `h c area ;; "M�. EIVITrar ", „ "": "e r -�' f 1 �in �NPOO �s zone "* �� f-4...ve,.=,w" CPA 00 0006" z They will be adjacent to a commercial /./ development, We .were concerned about the number of parking spaces i for each Unit (2) . , We had no problem with the items on the review Access to and from site. OK Traffic impact oK Neighborhood impact 01< Environmental impact OK (Suggest no wood burning s t ov e.s. H ow to l is the apartment? n w „ ,Q, , ..L...........»..-.....L.J,r-»..+,....,._.«:.a.u.-.4,....,u..f.., M.,....,,... i...., .�ti-�..':.ia:.trd..A...-..».h....+...-.,w.n ,..».n„tl.i.aHl.rl.....-•%1..w.5.:.......w1.::.:....,....�...a.,,n.J..+::JiR..,-..w.=.tr,...w.vcN.u.aw,i ...-_.,,...r..w.._.:..,,s...... ..:,.1..,r....�..sw..:;., .-u:nnW..t.sn«,w..ro.,.rA,;t..a. ,.«s.le..w.».'....,.., !.-.._.,,..H..., • NPO 8 Sept 11 1991 5. Items of Neighborhood concern . Joel reported that the City had put some traffic control bumps in the street at the intersection of t Barbara and Ventura Ct. They seem to help . 6 . No notices of Decisions were received. Cathy said that NP05 • could not get a quorum together to make a decision. ,.I 7 . Other Business Cliff suggested that NPO 8 propose to the City that: They contact the homeowners from Greenberg Rd. to Taylors Ferry Rd. (Adjacent to NPO 8) and ask whether they would like to be annexed into the City of Tigard. They were not interested the last time, but Cliff wondered if they might have changed their minds . JOhn mentioned that Food Club is going in, behind the theater. • D, rtmouth is going to be extended from 99w to 72nd ave. This goes through a major wetland. Dr . Davis' has reduced his herd to one cow. There was not enough feed for the rest of the herd, Meeting adjourned at 8:45pm. • • I , I I • I I I I , 2 ' • , I 1 . _.>....r.,-�. .-,.w,... ..--w,+h.l.�w:.,t,l:.s:kt.w<k,' »..---..r1:1..4',i!..�.r+...W lk-.wn..4:..'Ji-'i...u..-.w .. ...._,<......w..ur.,. -., ..- ..�. ,.a.s.....i..;w�l-'z..na..a.NNLL" ....N.,..Fawr..•. .. rw:nnNC'.. , tr .1. .v{1",3.33.,,,,,t137.,„.... t y'"J h .. 1133.. ', ' n 3-1 ,..1 . .r r a W r • ' D� 0 1 � �� ti r a �o v +' •„.4l,w,a.d.�P a y � . � • /p� „4,,,,:,,.:7-4,4;4.,': rccO' AIett { �"W+.Aa.« Jn,rPfdc' , . .. , ■ ,,r g.x .,ww r r rr d $ a W�Yy ��J y W qi • SI,"i.( i” i, IW g h1,.,Nv�hf by , 1 S126DC-03.001 .• Y•N 46.41 - - V .. ..tk 11�br:1 VAN SAUN, RAYMOND H & MARY M �/ % OUNDARI,f GERALD F & DFANNA "° °L 3220 SW FAIRMOUNt BLVD PORTLAND OR 91201 pry a 1 �rl�tft '� rr !!i1 i # 1 tb butt'$ t � F I � ��a f tart + tir . I r v , - .0.. .:.aw. K....,Hsu,..r.,«a.,.........wx..-...._.... ,.. ..w. . c.. ..........,.�,,..._w.A,d...., ,...•..w.;.,--.+,.r....... ..:..:... _.«..m.,yw.......,.._-:.v.aAUw�.:.....,,.,w...,.....,• ...s.-i....,,...:<ti..w.,.,_. ,.mn_:..,_Hw.::ww«.,a......u:'a.ww,a..--..wwr,..r.,,......, -•, . , ,,..+:x:,...., • • • , • • TO: DATE: September 6, 1991. FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE 'DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 91--0010 WATSON (NPO #8) A request for Site ' Development review approval to construct a foot seven unit apartment complex on a 0.61 acre site. ZONE: 21,-12 (Residential; 12 units/acre) . LOCATION: 9475 SW Lehmann Street (WCTM 351 26DC; tax lot 1000) ' • 64.10e0C44we r' Ir Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared • and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this 'application, we need your,comments by Sept. 16, 1991. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above dater please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PRONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Jerr�r' Offer .� PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: n We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. ' Please contact of our office. 1 . • Please refer. to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: q • Dame of Person Commenting:, t.•.‹..-44 Phone Number: --` bkm/SDR91-1O.8KM • • *� ... ,: .,.,..,.,.,.. .,,.. i.,.., ...,.. "... .,.. „• .,i.,.iu....,... ....,...,,. ,,.'. ... ,r. ,.., ,,.w ,,...y.... .......... .,., ,...,.,,..i, .,., •. .... .,. I ..... ., ,..•,.,... r.,,...,. ,.,.,.., ..., .., ,. ..,,. ..,.»,u.r,u4 •«xr r„.,u ♦ W • n u u w.+..,✓v.a.:.....+.n,.-...... n.,Y, ,aw..i......a n...H ...,«,_..,,. 1...,A..u.,.......,. ay...a ,...... ............r.l......A......+ L.'. _:.+tG.+...,.+.,..J14...r p...-a.'L.',:.L+....k-t......«IM-...N..............•:.A+..1.Y..-.ti..`.QWwIC.w..L:+'»..+4Vrr.:..,is..«..+...n:.✓...lYF.a..I.i,1,..:.:1...f«.....•.+..A«+:n.l..,..«.....:....,,...rtr.rrw. ...Mw_uw,a...r„ Y Peter Garrison o 9 4a 2 S.W. Lehmait Tigard, Qr 97223 October 7, 1991 II I I I Ron Pomeroy City of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Or 97223 Dear Mr. Pomeroy: This letter concerns the property at 9475 S.W. Lehman which is currently under application for development into a seven unit apartment compiex.: I am concerned about the two "monkey puzzle" trees which are on the property. Shirley Cook told !1 ` me that her father, Arthur Lehr, planted the trees on his father's land in 1906 when he was six years old, Bruce McFarlan, owner, of_the property for s ome thirty years, told me that they are the second tallest such trees in Oregon and that they are a matched pair of one male and one female. I / have also been told that the,,trees are on a City of Tigard map of points of historical interest. I . I I do not know what the current owner, Mr. James Watson, intends to do with.the "monkey puzzle" trees when he constructs • g r for a parking lot for his tenants will be his building, however cut down to make I assume the worst: the trees w�.l e way parking his a. This building marks a deteriorization of the neighborhood which, given the way the overall area is being developed, not much can be done about. I think, however, that the ttol trees de •vo to be saved as „part4.of`the historical continuity of th region and that Mr. Watson should accomodate his devel- opment to protect them. Sincerely, Peter Garrison RR/LI":° r8it) /. 001" 11 1991 CITY OF tIQIAR MANNING D M'TM ... ..........„w,.,.. .. .,..,... .I.e,..a n,,.,•.,U.. ,. ..,,.,.,,,...., .I. ,., .Ir..,.r,.>„ ,., ,,,I..,.,....w..,..u,,..,. ,..,.I-,1,1,1,.,....,,u..0.,,..,,. „�,,,...,u,vw .r.., ,. ..w NUw oN„, w..,..., ...,aw,,. .ww. a».,,.,.,,,,I M.,..,,, I. II ... a..n `'•^ , ti r 0 • • „.. ...,.—F Mte.,,...,L„4r.,._4.-..,,..e._r_.._,t,„, .r..,.,.,..«.«1:..r_,..._.,...,+,.,,.,,4.+, ....,.—.,.,,...,, ..„......«,.,.....1...».:x.r...,,w,ihnm...... ,.,t ,.,n4:.r......,....r.r.....r,:—.,.....+wrw r.:.....A.„ rr,...�F........1. . 1 r ..w.w',:.,t� 4n,...,»--4�..wrwl.wu.;.'.Nr r.b+.�,.+«..u,WA.t......,.1�•....,..+�i�.r.,,...ri..MI.A.krw+-,...,,. f • TO: �"•\r �� 1 p 11 DATE:. September 6�1991 ,' FROM: Tigard Planning Department ”. i • M. -RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SAR 91-0010 WATSON (NPO #8) A request for Site ' Development review approval to construct a foot seven unit apartment J` complex on a 6.61 acre site. ZONE: R-12 (Residential, 12 units/acre) . LOCATION: 9475 SW Lehmann Street (WCTM 1S1 26DC, tax lot 1000) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement •for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared l' and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you. wish + `F to comment on this application, we need your comments by .Sept. 16, 1991.. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your coaanments. If you are unable to res nd by the above dater please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm 'dour commenta in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. ' PHONE: 639-4171. 'STAFF CONTACT: _JerrOffer PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We hare reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. ,: ;Please contact of our office. '` , Please refer to the enclosed letter. • ` Written Comments: ? ` tom.;_C ,_!t__t .. c ;,..‘--1 r. .; C..- 5.-- _(„)a-7-c. )g---.....e2.---'01-,a----T.-..a..-T---...-0...sel-rr;.:—..... .-Lek—.-4—e.2..."2-a)-4--..17--'. es./".--- ---Z-2,1.4.1d2) ' ,t �. ` L).� L . .2.„2, 1„,,. r .0. Ii� a J 1, • (";. t4 A. l� k7 _ G t�1 i ` '� ' (�' 1 ,' 1 J H Name of Person �� f? � ( �----.. f � �� / . Phone Nutuber: c, ,,,t_.,',.•- .4.c6.,) 1 bkm/SDR91--1O d Bitm 1'I , r . 1,I • {, I , iI _«i_,.,'.:,«...;.,.i_...,...,.. ,l..i',.,:.,.,.,.wu..}.:..v...,«.N.;l!�..,..:.1....« ......,..i.«M.w��..., .ia,r....;.u._..�..,a..»u,,.. _ ...,.�....,. - ' .eE «.,�«t.L.wwttte..ntu.:,...+.... .,i�,.r�.'L...»,.54n,J.,.::u,..,t 'i .......RJ.«t..,.,.::d..:.w:»a...-.a:.ti:.._'...a,...i,.:,w.•a. !'....:,1....M.ml.......,.., NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION P DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST NPO # 8 Request; Zone; Location: Applicant requests Site Development Review approval to construct a 1,750 square foot 7 unit apartment complex. ZONE: R-12 (Residential, 12 units per acre) LOCATION: 9475 SW Lehmann St. (WCTM 1S1 26DC, tax lot 1000) Please review the attached development proposal and comment on those items listed below which concerns) this NPO regarding this application. This listing is a template to aid in your review of this proposal. Please let us know how you feel about this development taking place in your portion of the city. Think 'ou Access To To and From Site ti Traffi. Impact � �,,.+�b e.t-) ‘A.0. t3e,_ :.,,, . Neighborhood Impact f 1 K Environmental I c "`�` ! �' Impact � -� COMMENT:, � - 0 - Doe) Ca. .: " ► �"� .1960 NO COMMENT: r Signed tt H!Date • • • ....Md. ..»u.4,.,-4.,414 44 ae.,._.4.,...A 41,...., ...,.. 44.u,.,..1,.. ..:.a..-,...,...,..a.._».M..m4, A4,4 .,4.w.:•,......«. ,..:r....,.•.,...,,,...,. ....4u044-..,...J 1w444.4444.,r.«.,4414M..41.."44.«1 ,.4-4,.,,.4,_.-..4.w44.11..«» 44.A..,....... - 044.,r ww....-,.,4,..,......i.....A.ww..a;.....V.:.a..«...,..+,.0-14,.41 ....+, ir..... MEMORANDUM • CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON • • TO: Jerry Offer September 18, 1991 FROM: Chris Davies, Development Review Engineer RE: SDR 91-0010 - WATSON • ' I . 1 Q I i r 1 n D P Grl tl .,S The applicant proposes construct a seven unit apartment complex on . a 0 . 61 acre site. Findings . STREETS: I � Access to the site is provided from S.W. Lehmann, which is classified as a local street Currently, there is 60 feet of �right-of-way that fronts the development and local street standards require 50 feet of right-of-way. Therefore, no additional right-of-way is required. The existing street is a mixture of improvements; 1) adjacent 11 to the site and along the north side of S.W. Lehmann there is pavement, approximately 12 feet in width, with no other, improvements; 2) on the south side of S.W. Lehmann, for p' approximately 250 feet, there is half-street improvements , including pavement, curb and sidewalk; 3) for the remaining frontage, along the south side, there is pavement, approximately 12 feet in width, with no other improvements . ' Therefore , the applicant should be required to install half- • street improvements along the frontage of the development. 2 SANITARY SEWER: • There is an existing 8 inch sanity sewer line located within � S.W. Lehmann. It appears that it has the capacity to handle tH this development . Therefore,; the applicant should be required to connect to the existing sanity sewer system: 1 . a r 3 . STORM SEWER: • i' After reviewing the storm sewer system maps it was not readily 1 � i' { apparent if there is an existing storm system that could serve that thisdevelopment. ' ' ere are twE? systems that are in the • vicinity of this development; ENGINEERING COMMENTS, SDR 91-,110 WATSON' 1 N I w.................1,.,..,+,.-.,.,.n..,:,M.-..—.,,._._.....,a,..,..,.,_w........_...,...:, ,,, ..,....,,.._«..,_,,..»y...ia_...,-....,.................,.u.w.._.....,.........., .,,....,.»...x_.wdX..—a„_,...w..t,.: . ,,...,,..,J.1.,—,.w....,,_..n.......I:..,,.u,,. ,.M,..«.,-,i.,r.......r..:!...»,.v.:,.' .,:,w,..,.;—.,l...«w.,4.a.nU i , s,..7:,.:......,t.»' • • ,1\ A) the one located in S.W. Greenburg Road appears to be at to high an elevation to work; B) the second system is located adjacent to this I m development there is a catch basin on the south side of S.W. Lehmann with a 12 inch pipe that then goes south to S.W. Coral into another catch basin with a exit pipe that 1'I a pp ea r s t o be 1 8 0 r 24 inches . I t appears that,t this system may work, but it does have a couple , of problems .. itself (1) it may be a to high an elevation; and (2) after tracing the system it appears the 18/24 inch pipe is connect to a 12 inch pipe and then goes into an open ditch. The remaining downstream system, is a mixture of open ditch, with culverts for the driveways, and appears to flatten out with no outlet in the vicinity of 92nd and Coral. Therefore, the applicant should be required to verify that the existing system has the capacity to handle this and all future development that would use this system; if it is determined ; that the system is undersized the applicant should be required to improve it meet the future needs of the area. Recommendations • ' 1. An erosion control plan shall be provided' as part of the public improvement drawings . The plan shall conform to "Erosion y' Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, November 1989 . " !' 2 , The applicant shall demonstrate that storm drainage runoff can be discharged into the existing drainageways without significantly properties downstream. Y impacting p A 3 . Storm drainage details shall be provided as part of the public improvement plans , Calculations and a topographic map of the drainage basin be r supplement t Storm drat in area shall provided as a ' pp._ement o f. ,a' the public improvement plans . Clulations shall be based on full. development of the serviceable area. The location and capacity of existing, proposed, and future lines shall be ' addressed. ' 4 , A grading the existing ing plan shall be submitted tted showi g t17 ' sting and k . ubmi n proposed contours, including elevations at the corners of the lot and at the four (4) Corners of the building tied to the top of Curb elevations as shown on the public improvement plans . ENGINEERING COMMENTS: SIR 91-10 WATSON V { ,..,_«..., ,...,f.;h....k;;,A:sv»:,,.• ,..:'u:,.,a;..,.:.l:.t :•L:.,a....:li.4,,.,w:!)«-., .«.il. .�,.i.l_..a....,.u',.•._k .....,.,..•.ir...,a...,,...,,.....,_.a:...,,...,._.,..1 '' .....•^ ! ,rl ; • .,.. •.a,..—:w. 'bw.,...».J,.«.,_ ...L ...,«»,a......:•,.t.`u..:..,'.._.:wt.v,.w.tf.:..,.+.�.>_.,.1.:...»ww.ti;+.:.:,.G.Pwu.....m_e.'.L.,.w.,,V':...»...w....a.:..»:..: LL 5 . Standard half-street improvements, including concrete sidewalk, driveway apron, curb, asphaltic concrete pavement, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, streetlights, and underground utilities shall be installed along the S.W. Lehmann frontage. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to Local street standards and shall conform to the alignment of existing adjacent improvements or to an alignment approved by the Engineering Department. IN ADDITION THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE; THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST. 1. SECTION 18.120 . 060 BONDING AND ASSURANCES • A. On all projects where public improvements are required the Director shall : 1. Require a bond in an amount not greater ater than 100 percent of other adequate assurances as a condition of approval of the site development plan in order to ensure the completed project is in conformance with the approved plan; and 1 2 . Approve and release such bonds . B. The bond shall be released the Directoa. finds the • B The leased when t � i completed project conforms to the approved site development plan and all conditions of approval are satisfied. • 2 . SECTION 18 .164 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS A. 18,164. 030 Streets 1. No, development shall occur unless the development has frontage or approved access to a public street. II 2 . Future Extensions of Streets and Reserve Strips : • a. A reserve strip across the end of a dedicated � street shall be deeded to the City; and �, b., A barricade shall be constructed la the end of �.0 at th the street by the property owners which shall not be removed until authorized by the City Engineer, cost of which shall be included n in t e er r the c s in the street construction cost . 3 . The City shall install all street signs, relative to traffic control and street names, as specified by ' ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 91--10 WATSON 3 I I I , aM1y p , i , ....,...._,1„........ .....n...,..».....m....,...,,,,. ......-..N._...-,,."r....+.,,.,�..w ,..........,..w.......:i_,...,,,.«..+.........wr"..F.,...,.«..,..u.......,ww....a»...;J,. .,.. ...H,.a—{....—,lu—,.. s.,•u.,...,..,,.,....t.:...a:.,..w.,,.. «.«NJ.:.,+-..rTn, aL..w...-F.a......,...,......,:-.,.,.,...w.,«,M..+n.1.i..l t,..:,.t-ti•'.,.,..,.,:'.. "‘ tip_, r; ' the City Engineer for any development . The cost of signs shall be the responsibility of the developer. 4. Street Cross Sections: a. Surface material shall be of Class C or B asphaltic concrete; ' , b. The final lift shall be placed on all new " • construction roadways prior to City final • • acceptance of the roadway; however, not before . 90 percent of the structures in the new development are completed unless three years have elapsed since initiation of construction in the development. c. The final lift shall be Class B asphaltic concrete as defined by A.P.W.A. standard specification d. No lift shall be less than 1-1/2 inches in thickness i i B. 18 .164.120 Utilities 1. All utility lines including, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting F and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating 4, at 50, 000 volts or above. C. 18 .164.130 Cash or Bond Required 1 . All improvements installed by the subdivider shall ,. be gu, ranteed as to workmanship and material for a t p eriod of one year following acceptance by the City ' Council'. r 2 . Such guarantee shall be securedi by cash deposit or bo the ount o l p ment s, nd in am of. Lhe' �ralue of the im rove as set by the City Engineer. - i 3 The Cash or bond Shall comply with the terms and ,� i , n �. �. n of Section 18 .160 .180 , • t o conditions o sect ENGINgERXNG COM F'NTS: SOR 91-10 WATSON 4 a .1, • • • • +, »,.......•. ,.._ .s r: ...�....�,.;�i...r. ..w��....J.,.......,..,......+v..,.......f ....,.,,...,.-,,, Mc..� i.......,_a M....,»+..w'�w.F+..:�iw,.:.c..,....s.wMi.+.r..,,wHu;4,f..,...,.x.,..li....r. • • D. 18.164 .150 Installation: Prerequisite/Permit Fee 1. No , land division improvements, including sanitary sewers, storm sewers, streets, sidewalks, curbs, ' lighting or other requirements shall be undertaken except after the plans therefor have been approved by the City, permit fee paid and permit issued, E. 18.164.180 Notice to City Required 1. Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance. 2 . If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until the City is notified. F. 18 .164 2 00 Engineer's� Certification tificatzon Required 1 The land divider's engineer shall provide written certification of a form provided by the City that all improvements, workmanship and materials are in accord with current and standard engineering and construction practices, and are of high grade, prior the City acceptance of the subdivision' s . improvements or any portion thereof for operation and maintenance. • APPROVED: .� ROVED Randall R. Wool City Engineer CD:sdr91-10 .CD • ENGINEERING COMMENTS: • u.., ... luaa.�...w...._»...a..�.,,....... „„.?..,.-.::.u.,' ,µ1.I 1...19YG+ .,....,..,.. .,-.,._...,.•,r.i._.,,u.«..�,.:ti..>.,,.,.+;..»-,-,m..a,.1'.«M.!....r,..,....,.,.,+.1,... ...,rv..l.,+i. ...-,.7x.a,L....n..w,.,.....i:M..l,.r».M-.,.,,,' ...+��. ,<.....,.4.,, ,......A..i,w..M,,.d..,3J.,_.�..,... +..u3-;,.... kl fi r r i ire t tl I, MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Jerry Offer September 101991 FROM: Chris Davies, Development Review Engineers • RE: SDR 91-0010 -- WATSON • Descritions The applicant proposes crastruct a seven unit apartment complex on ' • a 0 61 acre site Findinr�s 1. STREETS Access to the site is provided from S.W. Lehmann, which is classified as a local street. Currently, there is 60 feet of right-of-way that fronts the development and local street .` standards require 50 feet of right-of-way. Therefore, no additional right-of-way is required. . The existing street is a mixture of improvements; 1) adjacent to , the site and along the north side of S.W. Lehmann there is pavement, approximately 12 feet in width, with no other improvements; 2) on the south side of S.W. Lehmann, for approximately 250 feet, there is half-street improvements including pavement, curb and sidewalk; 3) for the remaining frontage, along the south siCe, there is pavement, approximately 12 feet in width, with no other improvements . ' Therefore the applicant should be required to install half- street improvements along the frontage of the development. , 2 . SANITARY SEWER: There is an existing 8 inch sanity sewer line located within G S.W. Lehmann. It appears that it has the capacity to handle this development . Therefor e, the applicant should be required , • to connect to the existing unity, sewer system" • 3 . STORM SEWER: After reviewing the storm sewer system maps it was not readily apparent if there is an existing storm system that could serve this development. There are two systems that are, in the vicinity of this dev'el�opmment � ENGINEERING COMMENTS: SDR 91-10 WATSON 1 • • r.. 4 k •..,-_... ...,.....�.A.,,..,.»...«A.. S.W.• • • A) h A the one. )� ., located in S Greenburg Road appears to be � . , at to high an elevation to work; B) the second system is located adjacent to this � 1 development there is a catch basin on the south side of , • S.W. Lehmann with a 12 inch pipe that then goes south to . . S.W. Coral into another catch basin with a exit pipe that • appears to be 18 or 24 inches . It appears that this system may work, but it does have a couple of problems itself: 1 it may be a ( ) to Y' t o an (2) after tracing the system it appears the 18/24 inch pipe is connect to a 12 inch pipe and then goes into an open ditch. The remaining, _ downstream system, is a mixture of open ditch, ' with culverts for the driveways, and appears to ' flatten out with no outlet in the vicinity of '= S.W. 92nd and Coral . Therefore, the applicant should be required to verify that the existing system has the capacity to handle this and all future development that would use this system; if it is determined % that the systw,In is undersized the applicant should be required to improve it meet the future needs of the area. Recommendations: 1 . An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings . The plan shall conform to "Erosion Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, November 1989 . 2 . The applicant shall demonstrate, that storm drainage runoff can be discharged into the existing dranageways` , without significantly impacting properties downstream. 3 . Storm drainage details shall be provided as part of the public ' improvement plans, Calculations and a topographic map,� of the r storm drainage basin area shall be provided as a supplement to the public improvement plans . Calculations shall be based on full development of the serviceable area;, The location and of existing, proposed, and future lines shall be addressed. 4: j A grading plan shall be submitted showing ewing the existing and proposed contours s and typical finish ed floor e levations on each. _,I.-including elevations at 4 different corners of the flog plan tied to the top of curb elevations as shown on the public improvement plans. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: 8 EERY ��DR 91-10 WATSON�, � � � � 2 • ,..x..,.,w.,.;,«i,.,_.d.,..,.ti��:_.ti..,.....'.:G.«,iu,i+,«..,.,..+,...:.,'n. r,.n._,.....r,1, .. . ...n,...M .x..4.1.. ...,,.,.,«,.-.H.tw-:..,., k......W.:....rn1�.. :',-........_m.i_v'A."+ { -a ..._.,w-:...+w,.. »i L.ti....•.,.,,.....,. rwAGw.,.1,...r,:.i..,•+.,,,..,+.uI G,J..,.+5..1.,-.,».:-U..:H.... .'7� t „ • • • IN ADDITION THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE; THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST. 1 SECTION 18 .120 . 060 BONDING AND 'ASSURANCES • • A. On all projects where public improvements are required. the Director shall: 1,, Require a bond in an amount not greater than 100 , percent of other adequate assurances as a condition of approval of the site development plan i' i order to ensure the completed ' completed project is in conformance with the approved plan; and .� ti 2 . Appxov.. and release such, bonds . • B. The ��bond shall a l b e released ased h wen the Director r fin , o thy. completed project conforms to the approved site development plan and all conditions of approval are Satisfied. 2 . SECTION 1$ .164 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT MkNT STANDARD S A. 18.164. 030 Streets No development ent shall occur the develop m 1 . � � de m unless �.he development ' P , has frontage or approved access to a public Street. 2 . Future Extensions of Streets and Reserve Strips t ' � � � � �� a: A reserve strip across the end of a dedicated street shall be deeded to the City; and g b� A barricade Cade shall be constructed at the end, of the street by the property owners which shall rot be r z�, • removed until authorized by the City ,. Engineer, the cost of which shall be included in the street construction cost 3 . The City shall install all street Signs, relative to 1 . traffic control and street names, as specified by for any development. The cost of the �City;�Engineer p .� �� signs shall be the responsibility of the developer. 4. Street Cross Sections: a. Surface maLerzal �. s all be of Class C or B asphaltic concrete; ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 51-10 WATSON 3 • 1/ m + •. L, .t.+-.u..,: .+.-„,„. +,:..I,.w.:„..--......... I..,..-..4--...--.4,..!-,...—)_— _w -_,, .....,—Y..&-....—....—....,i « .,...-..ti�1....wp.+..C.u. :_+ m:-..:1..,.,.,..,,,-, .. ,. c. ..ii s I .,.«+., �... i:..,+....+...,.:_:,:.µ.,.......-:e.r..,w:i:..�,d...,...Hl.lwM;.i ' r, c:; • ry . " b. The final lift shall be placed on all new construction roadways prior to City final acceptance of the roadway; however, not before percent of the structures in the new development are completed unless three years have, elapsed since initiation of construction in the development. c.' The final lift shall be Class B asphaltic ` ..,,, concrete as defined by A.P.W.A. standard ? specification d. No, lift shall be less than 1-1/2 inches in thickness . 18.164.1201 Utilities l ties 1. All utility lines including, but not limited to 'as those required., for electric, communication, 'lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface .' mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes' and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, tem p orar y utility service facilities during t, construction high capacity electric lines operating at 50, 000 volts or above. C. 18.1 6 4 Y13 Required O� C�ah Cash or �Bond �Ftp a 1. All improv m n is installed by the subdivider shall � ` , ' be guaranteed as to workmanship and material for a period of one year following acceptance by the City Council: 2 . Such guarantee shall be secured by cash deposit or ' ■ .� bond in the amount of the value of the improvement as set by the City Engineer. 3 . The Cash or ,bond shall comply with the terms and ,1 conditions of Section 18.160 .180 D. 18.164.150 Installation Prerequisite/Permit ' Fee 1. No land division improvements, including sanitary ; sewers,' s torn s ewers, streets, sidewalks, curbs, ' lighting or other requirements shall be undertaken ex' cept after te r t he plans therefor have been approved . b y the Ci t y, permit fee paid and permit issued. EIY Y C5 l � 6 Y�8 0 Notice to city Required � • 1,1 Work shall not 1e in until the city has been ENGINEERING COMMENTS: SDR 91-10 WATSON' 4 ■ . • 1 ,. 41. . y . dKpItid nyh,.,..,aw.,lGn .--,....0 w....,.;4.,,.a.M.w. ..-o-JAw..i.,a..,�l..M:,s 7«,4.. »..... ,.,w.«tskL..,a k,...a,.... ..+..i M...n:«r.�.d,u,,..+w........,l,u.,.T..u4 .w»w..i..H.n�16waSw 1, ..n,t-was,.e-.........._.an.,-a.:,.,..,,s3.+:,L,a«.u.L...L.:..,il. ..w...+„.,.1....:..r..«Nw.ryLrr...�.,,,wr,i.,w.d:,.. w • a:i }•ra r xt i�Y notified in advance. 2 . if work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not l'. be resumed until the City is notified. ,., F. 18 .164 .200 Engineer's Certification Required a: 1. The land divider's engineer shall provide written certification of a form provided by the City that b all improvements, workmanship and materials are in �'' accord with current and standard engineering and construction practices, and are of high grade, prior the City acceptance of the subdivision's t,„ improvements or any, portion thereof for operation ! and maintenance. .... • I 1 i i" I(tit . 041'11 t, . li)bli) tle • ro et) a ,iiii, F APPROVED: Randall R. Wooley, City Engineer 1 CD:sdr91.10 .CD • Po ENGINEERING - WATSON , COMMENTS: SDR 91. 10 W F w . . IAI ' 1 - x ...- •-.s..,...+...N..,F.rJ.t.-n....I.IN..,..L._F.S'.......a.x.x...,.[......ua...wr.•:r.s.a.u' [.ww ... _ ,._..-..,..aw».,...a..n r..r.« -... .- _ l�x, .. .L. .. FROM WOLF CR5 K HWY 1Jt�75 I: " 7 S r '' ( ( ' . . 00.. '.0r•..t.. 1..0 • TO: P.w �� 1l�.. ( + ' - .4 c-.+ DATE: t a a ba tC 6, 1 k E,__ ..._. PROM: Tigard Planning Department . ,'; Rai ,irs_DE Mm T -zvillW S ; 9;-0' A, • ; . 0N (U #8) A request for Site Development review approval to construct a foot seven n omit apartment aent comp1ax on a 0.61 acre sits., ZONH: R-12 (Residential, 12 unitsiecre) . IO.hTIOW: 9475 SW Lehmann.,Street (WGTM lei 26D0, talc lot 10(m) • P 1 s• Attachajd is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From f om.ation supplied by various departments and agencies and from other . information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared 'aid a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wia►h to comment, on this application we need your comments by 1 1 , 19 . You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your • comments. •' -u are ;+_blo.to - ..net b the a bo 40AL please phone the staff . contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as poeathle. If you have any gueetions,re larding this matter, contact the . Tigard Planning Department, PD Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. , . PHONEX 639..41/1. STAFF CONTACT* o PL2Amt OIOR THE POT,ZOWINCI iTBMS THAT PPL 'I tti/ We have reviewed wed th.e proposal and have no objections to it. Plaaao contact a , AA ; of our offie e. • • . • Please refer' to the enclosed letter. . ■ ''' —,---114t--" ,-1161ert-al"-----4221- Lj ' wo. Name of Person rat Ong 1 sa kM/SDR9l=.1O.h "d , , i •tili' . '''. . ' \ 1 .--.'• \ . • • 'a. • V : it r i i.. .. ti ...1+:.+.wati..i.. .w.n...w1..--N+4i=.rnx.r.Y...r..,n..n:..A..ww.+r..'W1✓Y..r.i.,.l..n A11-rn....e+.n..rn,:rJArM» ti4.JJ:WrrwMJn ..«.J rI trti_nn v.,i.. •;,.t.5..w':*w.rw«..-.drAt,X....c:».:a...N..w,.:-n.l'....:.iwti.w.u.,+«..»....:-r.a..k:�i.,._..,.. _...a.,.n...n:.a.....:.....xl...iMWat..a„-..,...,.:+t+_.'„a,!.......i»:i.w...,--...::Lw,....,..+ • .r'y.'h I�14 t 1 TO: it, DATE: Se tember 6 1991 y r 0 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 91-0010 WATSON (NPO #8) A request. for Site Development review approval to construct a foot seven unit apartment complex on a 0.61 acre site. ZONE: R-12 (Residential, 12 units/acre) - LOCATION: 9475 SW Lehmann Street (WCTM 1S1 26DC, tax lot 1000) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared <. and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your Comments by Sept. 15, 1991. You may use the apace provided 'below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. jf'you are ungbie to respond by the above dater. please phone the staff contact noted. below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the ' • Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, 012.97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: e'er offer PLEASE„ HECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT'APPLY: We have•reviewed the proposal, and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. • Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: • ' r '• • • �•�•.rr ww�^r9M�rn�nwa��.irw�.�rnir_ _ -• mI1li ,r Name a'f Person Ca ent ins: - Phone Number bkm/SDR91--10 e 8KNi fir. • , � }i i s A • • ' •....,.+...n.»....i1..i.au,A-Y.1;r.a....:wM-.--wh.rr.rr....k:,..,a.n.w...U+I..Jn..W{r.WJ...+nJIF.....w.F.r+N-b... irL1++N-.3.wa.A..... ..l.r,+il..,+wr.a1N«r.+4NNrA.wIL+:Aw:.+i1r..+.W++.++--0w1a,wY sal...lx.:t,:l•xKiae..wJww......w+r..-.t..Jnn.N.W...rrvn.r«,1...rr-e"v.r4h.t..i.n/a-.. ari.- 1,.. 5,l.aei.a.,N.G::O.I'+NVt.axn.rlmFw.'.4.}..+..w.a.:HA...- , (4' TO: .X ' I I ." k I DATE: September 6, 199 . FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 91-0010rWATSON (NPO #8) A request for Site Development review approval to construct a foot seven unit apartment complex on a 0,61 acre site. ZONE: 1.12 (Residential, 12 units/acre) 1I LOCATION: • 9475 SW Lehmann Street (WCTM 181 26DC, tax lot 1000) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From , information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other • ' 'information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a 'decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish ', • to comment on this applications we need your comments by setot. 16, 1993. You t may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. ILyou are unable to respond by the abo�re dat,_„ , please phone the,staff contact noted ")elow with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as poss.i..01e. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the r Tigard Planning'Depar,:tment., PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. , : STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Offer PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: Y/e . We have reviewed the proposal and have no objeOtions to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: 3 3)i.vig. ..o P k..et. l"d' .r €(.:',.7)- .7 Ar.A/6/A,./=.4', ,i Atte4 -P' Foie 2e d2 ifee,,ifrma Z1147-1 JC9LL.,, .. ,; . ' )-_, .i/ :b Tr Ol K .1-/ of ' . ' w r IY4 p P1 5';Tom" _ ; .:.r e ii' Pte ``• l' ' r Name of Pel pion commen w Phone Numb [' bkm/SDR91-10.BKM Y. I` ri RECEIVED PLANNING 1 2191 i 1 Q., I , • a b a : A«;.a.., ..,:1.: « . «..w.L....+.A:...,-..,r a«.. Ir-.- :.+1' ++.:7,MS«« .. .-3 ...-....x•.a...-- Sxr..w,.,«;..,tw... .w a+t.m Nv.., ua«•,�i.....sa J....v.,...-.., »..v,.f..raw.,_.. ...,a,,.r,a..uLa«w H..w-'+.rtN.n.e.+. ur...N,....a..•..•1.. «...... ..:.M«r ..{ ,., • TO: \ Ri "� _ 714 ,A : TOu � ""� �G�/'� ��.. ! '`� �� DATE: 5epteittber 6'�991 FROM: Tigard Planning Department ER: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 91-0010 WATSON (NPO #8) A request for Site Development review approval to construct a foot seven unit apartment Complex on a 0.61 acre site. ZONE: R-12 (Residential, 12 units/acre) LOCATION: 9475 SW Lehmann Street (WCTM 151 26DC, tax lot 1000) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will, .be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Sept. 16, 1991. You may use the space provided below or attach a Separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date,. please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writ,xng as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the ,a. Tigard planning Department, P© Box 23397, 13125 SW Ball Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Offer .�... PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. f) - Written Comments: Name of Person Commenting: Phone th er: C477'1 / DH 91-�10.BKAS bkm 5 RECEIVPb IANNINn 1 ..,._w_,.. ,...,...«...w.a.,...,... .,.,,a«_. ..,.-,w...,.... .,._-...............a,..,+.„ .,,,.....,....,,.,.a..�s...............i,.......,.,..x,t..'..,1...,._.w,.........u.a..r-.........«.,_w.,,..cw--.:w..:........µit_..m..�,_.,w...tt-W.i,«ta',.'-n:,sa...n,,,..,. ..,.a.-_t«w•...,.,--w. _..,..,.. ......,.w.,.,.w.,i.. v...a ,,,.,, _ ' e TO: �1�: ( -Vc (C 2'3 DATE: FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 9i--001O WATSON (NPO #8) A request for Site Development review approval to construct a foot seven unit, apartment complex on a 0061 acre site. ZONE: R-12 (Residential, 12 units/acre) LOCATION: 9475 SW Lehmann Street (WCTM 1S1 26DC, tax lot 1000) Attached is the Site Plan and applicantes statement for your review. From • information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other t` information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared, and a decision will be rendered on the prc postal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need y.aur comments by Sept. 16, 1991. You may use the apace, provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. Xf you. are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm,your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Pia-ning Department, PO Box 23397, 13x.25 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: L. .-4171. ; STAFF CONTACT: Derr r Offer. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please,refer to the enclosed lettero �� Written comments: . — •••• - wrrww�rrrrr,rw�,.nw�r • IrMrrrry u�wr�1 P' _—- —_•- w.Wr,lrarwr ---_— •—_• •- ar�. -'vIW..rwv�riw,w�rrru rwM ` ,+wrLriv wr Name of Person Commenting: Ate d41 .J • Phone Number: bkm/SDR91-i0.131CM RECEIVED PLANNING SEP 1 1 1991 1 a • ._... ........,..... ,...,..--.._..,.x.._....—.1=...-..:.t ..._.,,.-1.-...i.i-.+..w..,..,.............-..,«.,.,...- .....x......,u... ....,_............:l,w ..,...n..-._.:A....«.F«.w...4....1....-........._.....w.i.._.:=++...:...w..w.u..,..,...`:i::..J.«u..«-LL.»u.,_w.«..«,.v..l.,....,.a...c......,..w...4uNln u..W........;r:wana-..,.+..z..Kau t`} e 'kti :. ( ( , I PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION FILE NO: SDR 91.0010 ` FILE TITLE: WATSON p APPLICANT: JAMES LIEBE WATSON OWNER: SAME 1240 MOKULUA DRYNE KAILUA, HAWAII 96734 REQUEST, ZONE. LOCATION e Applicant requests Site Development Review approval to construct a 7 unit apartment complex on a 0.61 acre site. ZONE: R-12 (Residential, 12 units per acre) LOCATION: 9475 SW Lehmann St. (WCTM 1S1 26DC, tax lot 1000) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential 1 NPO NO: 8 NPO CHAIRPERSON: Cathy Chase PHONE NUMBER: 620.1-4790 CHECI ALL WHICH APPLY: X STAFF DECISION COMMENTS DOE BACK TO STAFF ON 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME:7:30 HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: t 0 CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING.• . TIME:y':3 Q } REQUEST FOR COMMENTS �� ATTACHMENTS: _X VICINITY �� x^„ rAxDScAPa NG PLAN NARRATIVE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN X- SITE PLAN OTHER: I PREPARE FOR PLANNER PLANNER APPROVAL: • X .. ADVERTISEMENT - TIGARD TIMES OREGONIAN �I . �X NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS MAILED LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE OF APPLICATION , NOTICE TO DLCD ATTACHMENTS,' ..... �____._� STAFF CONTACT: Jerry" Offer CODE SECTION: 18.120 L . i r , R.O.S Construcion 7 5 2 0 SW Scholls s Ferry Rd. #}3-13 Beaverton, OR 97005 Of 4 � City Tigard I Tigard, Or. Reference Proposed 7 unit apartment complex at 9475 SW Lehmann, and attached application. 1. Our• estimated zm ted cost of construction for the above referenced job is $350,000.00. 2. The storm sewer requirements for the ro 'ect will be me .p � met by either connecting to the catch basin located directly across Lehmann St to the south, or if that pipe is not of Y sufficient� size requirements,�e� for ��our ,e � then uonnecta:ng to storm sewer line located on west side of Greenburg Road: 3. Site grading g on eas ts side o f pr property to be retained by plastic barrier fence. A minimum amount of grading will be necessary as we want to raise the level of the finished units per site drawings. 4. If approved, we plan on starting construction ction as soon as permits can be secured. 5. The enclosed building plans show a duplex, but a complete 7 plea foundation plan, including all necessary fire walls will be submitted with permit application. This was p re- approved by the bud/ding' dept. Thank you for your consideration of this application. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 644 . 7920 ors truly, I , Jim RoSs Rain Or 'Shine construct on � it f • : • • . _ _ . . . ,, . . ,. _ , , n ,_ , - The Cry of TIGAID : i _s 114 - (' , I : - ._, , _ C E OARCR EST [ ( > ST � '`1 - 3:...4 -z I ,__.. i 1 I ...,....,,,_, cn tirtl 9 1.0010 ,_ 1. ---' e -1 1 Ci 1 if - '' 1 It L , i 1 1 , _,, _ 1 e = _ I _ /�! _" - - - ---_ t -. - - - - - _- � Ls/ -� •�• ,511':•:; • q p - a a s i - = I - I - /1\\ . I t_ L ..„,A : ___ . : IM •.r• .. i. d • 7 1 t p1,1 , . :._ _ 1 y l < _ 1 14,i Lu 0 E i 1. I I1 - S - 01 I ORAL III -i i_I ,, L_ L t A,..; � _ S.W. I } E - r.10,1x.41111•111K2 ,:f4 e. ,, • ...r1.,._.><».,.,r..,»..a:.......-44.. • CITY OF TIGARD r PRE-API!LICATION CONFBRENC E NOTES DATE: d U rJE ! HA lo APPLICANT J t M ' _ AGENT: . _ — Phone: 44 ' G Phone: f PROPERTY LOATIOZ ADDRESS: .r LEN' h1 TAX MAP & TAX LOT, 151 4M L r r NECESSARY APPLICA.LION(S S+• - ts' ..O PM 1 • pRoC OS L DESCRIPTION: 7 .✓lA■n i c 0,I' /(1 /4 I// ,)/ •S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: J4 ED$ 4 t'S A,; t ZONING DESIGNATION. NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION CHAIRPERSON: MRL L''J/ftJ HAP.T PHONE: c t4S':�a9.__._�_ ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REOUUKKENTS 2451.nimum lot size: 4,050 sq. ft minimum lot wid t he _ t I 1� Setbacks: front- ft. side- ta ft., rear- -(p ft garage- 9.0 ft. corner- ft.' from both streets. Maximum site coverage: ... " Minimum landscaped or natural, vegetation area: 4 Maximum building height: 0 ' ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot frontage: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lot: created as part of a partition must have a r . \ minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15 foot wide access easement. Maximum lot depth to width r atio of 2.5 to 1. spEcIAL SETBACKS Streets 4 ft. from cex:terline of .. , i Estab` fished areas: ft. from r , Lower intendlty zones: ft., along the site's bound Flag lot: 10 ft. side yard. setback, boundary Accessory structures: up to 5�S s . ft. in si ze-5 ft. setback from side l a nd rear lot �.ines ff Accessory structures: up o' 1000 sq. ft. (where _ ' to 1 s here allova�ct See i lot applicable 0 foot separation C'� setbacks zoning da.s'r � backs Zero art line lots: minimum 1 ticin between buildingo Multi-,family residential building separation: See code Section 18.90.030 f'am.xrl resicienti_ Page 1 • p1i?,4, ' • • • • r SPECIAL HEIGHT LIHITS Flag Lacs: 1-1/2 stories or 25 ft.., whichever is less, 2-1/2 stories or 35 ft. in R-7, R•-12, R-25 or R-40 zones if standards of Code Section 18.98.030(8) are met. Building Height Exceptions (Code Section 18.98.020): Buildings located in a nonresidential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided: • 1. A minimum FAR (building floor area to site area •° ratio) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; 2. All actual building setbacks will be at least 1/2 the building's height; and • 3. The structure will not abut a residential zone district. RESXDENTXAL DENSITY CALCULATION Community Development Code Chapter 19.92 specifies that the net residential units allowed on a particular site may be calculated by dividing the net area the developable area by the minimum number of square feet required per dwelling unit in the applicable zoning district. Net development area is calculated by subtracting the following land area(s) from the gross site area: 1. All sensitive lands areas - land within the 100 year floodplain - slopes exceeding 25% - drainageways 2. Land dedicated for park purposes 3. Public right-of-way dedication , 4. All land provided for private streets (includes accessways through parking areas' The City of Ti d allows a residential densitt•,ransfer of up to 25% of • the units that ould otherwise ave been develo ed on sensitive ° ands teas •Listed in l) above to th developable potion of the sit in accordance with Co Section 18.9 .. .2 `030. 1 b is the responsibility of the .applicant for a residential development pproval,' to provide calculatiols for permitted residential density and density transfer. SOLAR ACCESS REQUXAEMENTS Effective May 1; 1991 all subdivisionS and minor partitions are subject to a solar access requl.+rernent which states that 80% of all lots developed Must be solar-orient The characteristics of a solar-oriented lot are high levels of wintertime sun striking the south walls and roofs of the house, house orientation maximizing south window area, and a 'south-sloping • roof area. ` To achieve this, one may utilize the following: I Basic, re li ement: so gn a lot with at least 90 feet of n n within 80 degrees dimension an orientation of south; 2. Protected 8oiar, Building Lines The solar building have line must { um of 70 feet between it and the middle of the lot to the north a) be oriented. Within 30 degrees Of south, ) C) have a minimum Of 45 feet between it and the northernmost buildable boundary of the lot on Which the building line is locate • Page Y 4a...4a rkw. ..-71+r,...1,1.+..<k.:....-.-u.a u.......u-.-,A r.......... .....4,.J- ...•,,..,. ,......,..xx w*wlu,rr..,w. .iu-....a.v«.a.r.•.....ike+.,W........r..-•.awrr.Hr-.,w-+••w..w..4...,.,.............+,..a.+ifi.tl««.w..nvr.:W..S.. ..,.,. v er.-.. e.,n,.a .,. i --" • . , ( ' ( • ' ' 3. Performance Options: The first option requires the house to be oriented within 30 degrees of an east-west axis and have, at , least 80% of the ground floor south wall protected from shade. e,, The second option requires at least 32% of the glass and 500 square feet of the roof area to face south and be protected l',,,, : from shade. Total or partial exemption of a •„e from the solar access requirement can be for the following reason: {`I. • 1. East, west or north slopes steeper than 20%. 2. Off-site shade sources (structures, vegetation, topography). 1. 3. On--site shade sources (vegetation). • Adjustments allowing reduction of the 80% solar lot design requirement can i•; • . be for the following reasons: i• 1. Reduced density or an increased cost of at least five percent due to: - east, west or north slope greater than 10%, -- significant natural feature, ,' - existing road or lotting pattern, - public easement or right-of-way. , ' 2. Reduction in important development amenities. ' , 'A 3.• Pre-existing shade (vegetation). Ii RESIDENTIAL DKNSTTX TRANSITION Regardless of the allowed housing density in a zoning district, any property within 100 feet of a designated established area shall not be developed at a density greater than 125 percent of the maximum II Comprehensive Plan designation (not zoning) of the adjacent parcel. PARKING AND ACE'S r . ^�` Required automobile parking for this type of uses�aS .'.� i /rahif' / • Secondary use required parking: -°----------- • 25% of required spaces may,be designated compact-only spaces. Standard parking space dimensions: 9 ft. X 18 ft. Compact parking space dimensions: 8.5 f6. X 15 ft. All parking•areas and driveways must be paved.. Handicapped parking:' All parking areas providing in excess of five L• required automobile parking spaces shall provide appropriately located and i' ' designated handicapped parking spaces. The minimum number of handicapped •. I 6i spaces to be provided and parking space size are mandated by the • ;� g • �/ � � � xe on Revised Statutes (see handout). A handicapped parking space ' A • y symbol shall be painted on the parking space surf ace and an appropriate /ON sign shall be provided. Commercial uses,are andr industrial uses civic ro ding 15 non-residential t more automobile • A,- parking spaces, I' • Bicycle c le p a rkin g must be provided a"t. .a ratio one , •�` bicycle rack space per 15 a uto parking Spaces. Bicycle racks shall be . located in �r ir eas protected from automobile traffic. Tie . arnirg Division can p rovade Specifications for bicycle rack types. Drive-in n use queuing areas � �. u q . J �'4. lei 4 Page 3 sib" , r P y1 I ; .,..: ...a.w...w..,a .;....a.... ...-.,.w..I..la,,,...,w»..w.-w.-.,.,. ...-,.«.-,,,_._x-,....-:,1 .w...w..';....., ...•.,. .„ w.+,I-.«.,+. ..,we..x.. ,..,w.Iw,..v., ....,,..,..,,..,aww.w+r... war,•„.. .I. .• • 4/1e, ,k(c/k Minimum number of accesses- Minimum access width: At it- , 7/-� --__ Maximum, access width: Pedestrian access must be provided between building entrances and parking, areas, outdoor common areas, and public sidewalks and streets. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses, see Community Development Code Chapters 18.106 and ,18.108. CLEAR VISION AREA The City requires that clear vision be maintained between three and eight feet above grade at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections in specified clear vision areas. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification i LANDSCAPING Vry . Street trees are required for all developments fronting on a public or private street or a driveway more than 100 feet in length. Street treee must be placed either withia . the public right-of-way or on private property within six feet of the right-of-way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of two inches at =our feet above grade. •Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on mature tree size. Further information on regulations affecting street trees and a list of recommended street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A minimum of one'tree per seven parking spaces must be planted in and around parking areas in order to provide a canopy effect. ' Landscaped screening of parking areas from views from public rights-of-way must be provider. ” BUFFERING AND SMEENING In order to increase ase ra��trac �and to reduce or eliminate adverse noise or p Y visual impacts between adjacent developments, especially between different er-imeters, 'City requires by are described ' ri� site. land uses, the Cit re ires landsca ed ,buffe'r arreae along certai " width. Suffer areas must be occupied•. buffer areas p Yr�miactuireea Code in terms of p eke iiced l�u • ied b of deciduous and •«� evergreen trees an Shrubs. Site obsruring Screens or fence s are also o required in Some ca aes and often are even not required. Required buffer areas may Only occupied by ve etatiQr , fences, utilities, and sidewalksb d bu er area th • fo�xx�d M l�o�le Chapter 18.100 18 1®0 r and the aterials and sizes may . the Plannin Division bulletin i be • , hla'ldit�,ana caps d on in p� Planning �t:�.n landscaping and buffering. i" : r Page • ` y Required buffer widths applicable to your proposal area: 5_ _ ft. along north boundary 5 ft. along east boundary ft. along south boundary _LT._ ft. along west boundary In addition, sight obscuring screening is required along SIGNS I Permits must be obtained before erecting any sign in t. e Cit y of Tigard.d. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if application. of a' development the sign, pxoposal Ls 'reviewed as part f Pp PAX/Mum FAcE, SENSITIVE LANDS AY_T'iDITIONAL PLANING CONCERNS OR COMMENTS PROCEDURE "1 l Administrative staff revieW. c�. Public hearing before the land use hearings officer. Public g before the Planning Commission Commission. Public hearing before the Planning with the Commissio r making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. Another public hearing is held by the city Council. All applications must be accepted by a Planni lag ,Division staff member at the Community Development Department counter without ll. Applications.�i ° �.t� City .Hall the c �.. Planning P Vision ,'� submitted by mail or dropped off at i� �.r ' acceptance will be batched for Applications Submitted' th the after f following week's Thursday will b processing ry • • is pp tions for processing. pp ons will be accepted after 3:00 a lica No applications peed 24. o n �'r�. ays or 4:30 on other. days. .d , x folded in advance to 8.5 by 11 Maps submitte�. with ar>, application shall be f�ol,d y CvA inches. One 8.5 by 11 inch map of �,, ed for to the f tit £ staff report or�admin a�trat�.v'e deioud one su'btrta. • Page 5 I a y 4 0 • • • The Plannin g Division and Engineering Division will. do a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is . complete within 10 days of submittal. Staff will notify. an applicant if additional information or copies of the submitted materials are needed. The administrative decision/public hearing typically will occur • approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult issues or, requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to „ . review. Written decisions are issued within 10 days of the hearing. A 10 day appeal period follows a 1 decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the _Elanoyv6-_ ..f A. basic flow diagram illustrating the review process is attached to this sheep: The pre-application conference and the notes of the conference are intended to inform the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to development of a particular site and-to allow the staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that;',should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide any information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. Another pre-application conference is required if an applicat&on is to be . submitted more than six months after the pre-application conference,, unless the second conference is deemed unnecessary by the Planning . Division. if PREPARED BY: Agt / - INe .r1V, ,.• iett )NE: .39-4171 p''OBL1c FACILITIES S ' The .. purpose of the pre-application conference is to: (i) • identify applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions; (ii) to provide City staff an opportunity to comment on specific concerns; and M (iii) to review the application review process with the applicant • ••. '. including identifying who will be the final nal decis�on maker for the application. The extent of P ublid pro � an d dedications to be required of the applicant will be recommended City staff and approved % by the appropriate authority. There Will be no final rec ommendation to the decision maker by City staff until all commenting agencies City staff and the application.public have had an opportunity to. review and comment en public .w � conam on the improvement related reg ireatme that may be required as projection a condition of development approval for your project .. ht-ot--taay d edicatlons The City of Tigard reqU ires tkat land area be dedicated to the public to increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification rights-of-way width specified by _ the Community i�evel.apm errt code. Page 5 • • • N • I I • i,... M}ta .-V. Jw•L ..r.....hA_u. i ........-.,u...w,+,..+.,.-.ww,_u.h....,._.... .._..,.. ...w..w w".. «. ..ua ' ' ' Approval of a development application for this site will require dedication of right-of-way for ' I • 3,, „ _ to feet from centerline. 0 4.., 2. to feet from centerline,.% ?' 8t;reet im rovements . 1. street improvements will be necessary along '" - • --_. street: prc7v' .t' t:- -wla 'rte avy.- 1 3. Needed street improvements will include 4t';7 feet of pavement . from centerline, curb and gutters, storm sewers, a five-foot wide sidewalk, necessary street signs, streetlights, and a two year streetlighting fee. 9 In some cases where ° street imprcents or other necessary public improvem- - : are currently practical, the street improvements may be de f erre"'. n -se cases, - a/a. condition of developm approval, the prope, y o "(s) must executes a non--re riser eement which waives the pr••-x. &lwner's right to e.wc.:IilLtr, lirnst the formation of a local improvemen district formed to improve 1 ._ _. / , PedestrIanwaysJbikeways: �I ...._...._......-- . Sanitary .Sealers: The cloest sanitary sewer to this property is an ,E1. ' • inch line located at--:U ih t('o Af at +&e. "t rte_ . The proposed development must be connected to a sanitary sewer. ... -- e-developer-Ls N resLy['ns i..1-i fie-e tend _ Y • -• - te""prrapos+ `c1'-clevekopmpmt--site,-. ------ Storm sewer ai.mprovements: , 1?t t. 7D,Z1174. '6.' 4, t _G/C ,5'7.-6-,e Ai t J A)-a.m... P/ / V5 T711 __.. Water Supply: The-51444-477A) l Water District phone should be public ontacted water �ar� .nto.r�na.t-ion area of this site. The District regarding water supply for your proposed development. ' Fire protectiont Tuaklaa tin Valley Fir e and Rescu e District (Contact: eerie • Birchill, 645-8533) provideS fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation s y stensr the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. other Agency II ' a !e , • Ili b • • • • -i?t TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In August, 1990, the Washington County Board of Commissioners adopted the county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) Ordinance and referred the measure to the Washington County voters. In September, 1990, the Washington County electorate overwhelmingly approved expanding the TIC program throughout all jurisdictions within the county. This action placed into effect an , increased street development fee on all new development in Washington County. The City of Tigard has adopted the county's program. The City Traffic Impact Fee program will collect fees from new development based' on the development's projected impact on the transportation system. Developing'properties will be required to pay based on the number of trips , they are projected to generate. The TIF is calculated based on type of use, size of project, and a general use based fee category. The. TI.Y' shall be calculated at time of building permit issuance. In limited VI q circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until issuance of occupancy permit.. Deferral of payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than a,000.00. O) S9e0i110421.TEIR QUALITY FEES t d The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce, Resolution fl.:. 90-43, Surface Water Management Regulations, requiring the construction of on-site water quality facilities or fees in 4 lieu of their construction.' The resolution requires that a fee and/or W construction of a water quality facility be built. The fee is based on the athount of impervious surface; for every 2640 square feet or portion thereof, the fee shall be $375.00. The City of Tigard determines if a fee or facility shall be built. tk STREET OPENING PERMIT No work within a public right-of-way shall commence until the applicant has obtained a street opening permit from the Engineering Department FINISHED T ,OOR :TMEVATIONS On all projects that require a grading plan the applicant shall submit with the grading plan a typical floor plan for each lot which shall have the elevations of four corners of that plan along wita elevations at the corner of each lot. PREPARED BY: ...../4-e18 ,11E5 ENGINEERING DIVISION PHONE: 639-"4171 1lbr/JO:PRE.APP.MST Page 8 '11 ' -, -.. ,....,,a_a..a4._'.__..vi._.......,..,.,.._ ... .,..a-..,_,_'-. ,,. ., ,.' ..- -. .,.....,..e_„..,.....,.r..m.,..a :-N_ eeWJ.,..,..,_»..-_.t:....»t4.,n ,...:f.+w.....:..........,, t.:i..4•«....ua4r........54.w.,,+.. ,.,...........,.. iw.i...+,-,..,,at..L._tda„r... {{ Staff Via, Date ....6—//..--17/ CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY 'DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT p APPLICATION CHECKLIST The items on the checklist below are required for the successful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be brought • and submitted with all other materials at the time you submit your application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call Planning at 639-4171. ITES TO BE , BASIC MATERIALS INCLUDED: A) Application form (1 GO '� copy) B) OWner's signature/written authorization C) Title transfer instrument C� D) Assessor's map [-I— E) Plot or site plan [ F) Applicant's statement [a-' `G) @ :. "-QP,Q, y---e+ t - — re-ssse s—t rirr--fie--€e - [ (H) Filing fee ($see_ice' kAec ,(A., SPECIFIC MATERIALS A) Site Information showing,; (No, of copies /55: C 1 1) Vicinity Map [ 2) size e & dimension dimensions Site [ 3) Contour lines (2 ft 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10%) [e. -”" d 4) Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds [ 5) Locations of natural hazard areas including: a) Floodplain areas [ a b) Slopes ih excess of 25% [ 'a c) Unstable ground C a d) Area s with high seasonal water table C . n) Areas with severe soil erosion potential [ ] f) Areas having severely weak, foundatioh soils [ 6) Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive Map inventory inc ltd ing a) Wildlife habitats C ] l b) [ � 7). Other site features: a) Rock outcroppings [ b) Trees with 6 + caliper measured 4 feet from ground level [(4 Location structures and their uses 3) I_o�a.ion of existing E , 9) Location and type o�- on and off—site noise sources [ ,. d �` 10) Location of existing utilities and easements [ 11) Location of existing dedicated right—of—ways 8} Site DeVe l op ne t 1 plah showing (No, of Go p i e s • ).� [ 1 1) T he p rop osed site and surrounding properties 2) Contour line intervals t 3) The location, dimensions and names of all: ) Existing '& platted streets & others public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining [•` properties APPLICATION CHECkLIST. Page 1 • • r r - Y . r 7 ..,..air... . . ._. .a.,i .,.i ., .,...,w..« b) eroposed streets or other public 'ways & easements on the site. C ] c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed , . streets that require 'future extension [ ] 4) The location and dimension of: a) Entrances and exits on the site E i b)b Parking and circulation area's c) Loading and services areas • (t2/...`' tom"' . 0) Pedestrian, and bicycle circulation e) Outdoor common areas. C f) Above ground utilities E, 5) The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: . a) permanent structures, improv emen ts, utilities and easements which are located on ° the site and on adjacent property within 25 i feed: of the 'sate (el— b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site 6) Storm drainage facilities 7) Sanitary sewer facilities 8) The location of areas to be landscaped Ems ' . 9) The location and `type of :outdoor lighting considering crime prevehtion techniques (. r, 10), The location of mailboxes . i) The location of all structures and their orientation [t 12) Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement .agreements [ ]' C) Gradin Plan (No, of copies ,_ � ). t ] The site development plan shall •include a grading plan' at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1) The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating general contour lines, slope'.ratios and soil stabilization proposals, and time of year' it is proposed to be done. C 2) A statement from a registered engineer sUpp ►rted by data factual substantiating: ,f a) Subsurface e,hloration and geotechnical engineering" report L b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm, drainage service proposals [ ] c) That all p roblems Will be mi ti g ated and 11? how they will be mitigated turalDr±, b) Architectural Drawings (No. of copies ) The site development plan pe.oposal shall include: 1) Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures proposed for Use ohs--site and [r,... 2) Typical elevation drawings of each structure. c U E) Landscape Plan No of copies ) ()5 The landscape plan shall he drawn at the same scale of the site a larger scale if ' xte ;�nalysAS plan or g necessary arid shall irdicatet 1) Description o� t he irrigation s y s teM wh ere applicable icable ( 4t 2) Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings c APPLICATION CHCCKLXST Page 2 • • 3) L. ..ation of terraces, decks, shelter's, play areas and common open spaces 4) Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials. t. The landscape plan shall include a narrative which addresses: 1) Soil conditions. C a 2) Erosion control measures that will be used. [ j F) Sign Drawings Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter er 18.114 of the Code as part of Site Development Review or • prior to 'obtaining a Building Permit to construct the sign. G) 'gaffic enerat:o,n estimate H) Preliminary partition or lot line ad'ustmen ma sh w' ) y i, o in , (No. of Copies ): Z L 1) The owner of the subject parcel [ 1 w 2) The owner's authorized agent 3) The map scale, ' (20,50,100 or 200 feet=1), inch north • arrow and date C � . 4) Description of parcel location and boundaries C ] 5) Location, width and names of :streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel [ ] ' 6) Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25 feet of all property lines ( ] 7) Location and width of all water courses (' 8) Location of any`trees with 6" or greater caliper at 4 feet above ground lev■A C '. ,9,) All slopes greater than a5 C �. 10) Location of existing. utilities lities and utility easement ■ g y s [ � 11) For major land partition which creates a public street a) The proposed right—of—way Aocation and width [ 3 b) A scaled` cross--section of the proposed street plus any reserve strip 12) Any appli#;able deed restrictions [ 13) Evidence that land partition will not preclude ; efficient;future land division toners applicable E ] , ,› x) Subdivision Prelim_ihar plat Ma and data showin (No. of ! • Copies � � - - � �� ). 1) . Scale equaling 30,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch . and limited to one phase per sheet 2) The proposed name of the subdivision [ 3) Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets [ � 4) Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner „ developer, engineer, surveyor, designer, as applicable( " 5) Date of application E 6) boUhdary' lines of tract to be subdivided C 7) Names of adjacent subdivision or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of unsubdivided land [ 3 3) Contour lines related to a city—established bench mark at. 2-foot intervals for 0-10% grades greater than 10% L APPLICATION CHECKLIST — Page E • (, . ♦ h 9) The purpose, location, type and size Of all of the ` following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): [ 3 a) Public and private right-of--ways and easements [ ] b) Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines [ ] • e) Domestic water mains including fire hydrants [ ] d) Major power telephone transmission lines . (50,000 volts or greater) [. ] e) Watercourses [ f) Dried reservations for parks, open space, pathways and other land encumbrances [ 3 10) Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe• sizes indicated [ ] . • I li) Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and p fire hydrants. [ ] 12) Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished . grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision. [ ] ? 13) Scaled cross sections of proposed street right-of-way; [ ] 14) The 'location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water, overflow • 15) Location, width and direction of'flow of all water- courses and drainage ways [ ] 16) The proposed lot configurations, appr•okimate lot dimensions and lot numbers. Where losts are to be used for pu. noses other than residential, it shall be indicated ups,. such lots F 3 1Y) re ter . ea all diameter Y) The location of ll trees with a di 6 inches or g a m sur^ed at A feet above',ground level., and I',• the'•location of proposed, tr^ee plantings, if any [ ] 18) The existing uses of the property, including the location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting [ .3 19) Supplemental information including: a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) c) A proposed .plan for provision of subdivision b) Proof of property ownership [ 3 p p p P improvements [ ] k 20) Existing natural features including rock out-, croppingsj wetlands and marsh areas. C ] 21) If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably g be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be ` incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application.lication. pp [ T) Other Information [ ] ' 44 (2362P/0028P) APPLICATION CNECKLSST, Rage 4 1 • ......._lu.�_..�......».-,.�.,..-�-w..-.r..a..�u „-i....m..,.�•.,...r,.,k„�N.,..�...�..±.........».«....-�....».............i..�.—.«-.A.p-.,»r...»..,......,....,.......w.,,..,...�....,.-•..+.....•.w..«a,.•.. ,-..-�1_,.::,��.�..c...,n,_,.�4,.•,.,..... ..,e.,,,....,•.� ._.��«,L�.i....--../r...i...,w..»..n-' .i..au.w.-_,-,_....w...--»d,�,.;-::»...a M�;.,-.....»..,.a r...... A F ,....,,, .... • I' , 17 l''''' H ... 35 ' m m . . .. , , . . . „. . ,.,i . . , ., . . . . ,. ,,, , . . . . J., . , . . . . , . , , . .. .,, , . . , . , , , , : jl. ... , :, : . . . . . . . , . , . . . , . .. ,. .. , . ,• . ... . . . _ . . .. ,,. , . �. o ... . . . . . . . . .. . .,., .. . , .. . , ... .. .. ,. .. . ,. . .. . . ,, .. , . .., , . . , . . , . , . . . , . • , , . , . , , . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . a tY " ` . . . , ., . . . , .. . . , . . . . . . . . , , . . , , . . . .. . ., , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .:. . , . . . . . . ,, . . ... .. . ..„ . . .. . . .,.., . . ,. , , . . : . . , , , • • . . . . . . , . . • . . , , .,. , . , . . . . . . : . . • . . . . . , , ,. . , ,, ,i J. , , , , , , , . . , . , . . , . . .. . „, , . . . . :. , , . . . , . . . . , . .. , , , , . „ . , . . , . ,. . . ..... . . v'�r 1 . . . .. .. . , 1! I I:,. ; /I ii' 1,' ;; l;l , r,