The URL can be used to link to this page

SDR1993-00007 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. wlyy • 1 Y I • • n 1 , R , 4I 'i „t it g 7 '`i • • 95 ow, )acif c Highway ,._ . oY , l; wnY', ''l' nay.• ''! � ..V FL,' 1, I' rL71u.:„:..,;..'.:u.,.aw„'.14&Iw:.t:h, h«,;.,�,.' r I. n+..,; Il:.,a.,..„:,...„..w.t.«.U:a�., .._,....,,..n4.;, w� ti h • l• , It'. I + 1 . t I i, ,I ' I I I I I I I I I 1. I G 11 •, `1 ,',1' II, ICI f la I , I I I I • I 1 I r,J I I I I I I I I 1, ' • I • I • I I , I • • I 1 . • I I I I , ' .1'i....'1 �' I I I i I „ • I I I I I , • a I y I I I• I • • , • I ■ I I I , I I •, i • I I I I m I I I I I • •n I r e"• 'd. ru .r -1 ` . ,''• PT,ACE UNDER CITE' OF TIGARD LOGO ' ,'4'.^.', The following will be considered by the, Tigard Planning Commission on Aug. 8®. o"" ., , 1993' at 7:30, PM at the Tigard 'Civic Center - Town Hallg 13123 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon. Both public oral and written testismony is invited. The ,° publics hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance with the rules of Chapter 18.32 of the Tigard Municipal Code, and rules and procedures of the Planning Commission. Failure to raise an issue in person or by letter r' prec1ude,s an appease and failure to specify the criterion from the Community i Development Code or Comprehensive Plan at which a comment is directed , I precludes an appeal bated on that criterion. Further i nformation may be obtained from the Plannin g Division at 13125 SW Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223, or by calling 639-4171. PUBLIC HEARINGS , I` SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CDR 93-0007 FRANCE SC3x An appeal of an :' Administrative Decision approving a request for Site Development Review to . allow construction of a 5,000 square foot commercial retail building. LOCATION: /1595 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 181 36D8,' tax lot 200) APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62.050, 18.100 18.102, 18.106 18. j,. , 1®S, ll�.,�14, 18. 2[x, and 1f3.15 . I ZONE: C-G (General Commercial) The C-G zone allows public agency and ., administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, businead support services, and eating and drinking establishments among other uses. r i l , I TT PUBLISH AR ' I I i l l , i' ' 11 , { t II i I `I . . • I I ' , I I • . �, . CITY TIGARA 4 aaha.n on t Count. I W I r I • I I I I � I I NOTICE 'o1' FINAT.,,•O R DY.PLANNING'COIMIESION E ,r, 1. Concerning Case Nu aer(s)a SCR -»0007 ' 7'. � � � , 2�� Name of,Own er. ...j ten ero me �r�ncP sc hi I I i f � � � f ' Name •of Applicant:cant: tame .... .__„ I I i f I { S I I 3. •Address 0»Third Street : _ City San Francisco State CA Zip 9 , '' M. 4. Address Of Property: 1 595 SW pacific i rhwa .• ?. '1ST 3D8 to c' l it '200 ' ! :' . Tam Map and Lot No s y.. .._�_�__._ ._.._:L : Administrative Dec�'Laion p ,proving• a _request 15.� I ��'Ree�est: An appeal of ,at Administrative � � � . � �. �`r . for Site' Development !Review to 'allow construction of a 5,000 I' Square: foot commercial retail building., APPLICABLE REVIEW '- CRITERIA: Community Orelepment Cade Chapters 18.62.050, !i . 2 ". 18 000 ''1810 18.106, 18108, ' 18, x14, • 18r 120, and 1S.164» ' . I , � one,:: C-G r irial The C-O zone allo,ts ublic agency a • I � and �dministrate rv .d es, pab�is support i lcilities, . P rofess�on�l and'administrative S YideS, financial, 'insurance, and real estate services,; business 'support •.ear,,: servi4�es, and eating and drinking estab1iahrienta among other` , `. ucaee. d . Ction. A �rova 1 as re est e � ' . ra A pp rov*a . with cndit ons Denial 1. ilot_Ce .. Notice was' published in the newdpaper, posted at City Ball,l, ,, ,and failed too ; I . X ' The applicant and owners y , ' 1 a oe ' i . .• re� �:Lred.d�i�st n The affected Neighborhood Plannin Or anizak ens a record witk�in the g g icin - X Af 'eCted .gdvernmental agencies ' , , 8. Final Decisions THE DECXSxON SgALL BE 1 NAL ,OBI .., „,, ' .I. 'UNLESS APPEAL The adopted findings Of : . . lion, statement of Conditions f ` • ;' �,� adopted �. .� g � ad��, deC�. and� � can: �� ' , be ,obtained from the Planning bepartment, Tilgard City Hall, 13125 SO F; Hall, �P�iOa Hox ,23391, Tigard, Oregon 97223'' H ; PA ,e3 • , , � t to � � � � cry� a a sal thza do � � ,, H � � he d �M I �I i,ta �”' � � inrk �� sal' n� patty ,� �d1' may pp o.�diax�' �- ( ) I � do� � hl 1$� n 18»32 ,370 " " , 32. notice a a�wen and fil 0cda s 'af`ter " sa.�h provides this • a� wx`itten�appe��a� mad b�2�0 �d"w>�'th�.��1 ��I .�,,� . II '� g I, � � I sent. The appeal may be subm teed I onl City fo�:m5,and..,mdet be aodoampanield q•,: . : by the appeal lee ('$315.00 y 1 and i:ranso°ipt costs, (varies up , MaliiMuM of 500.00) rI The deadline' for r :an a an app �x s 3.30, p. n. , I , - I f o„u, have an�� eSt ions 0 .ease ,..all'° the l i .y* of Tig'atd; 10. .P"lanningsDepartment, 639 41'714 ,, I , I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I , .�,....� ,..�'..,;i,'...,._,,�._rte I.. .i. , „C'w ,..,. .��_.i,. .i r.,..,,..4.M ., ...�. .....,,..,_.r i•. �. ..�. .I,...,,r.«.... «:I..:,,''..I,.�,�.... ,;�,✓,..Jwl.,.�.i�... .., m....,i,., „W r PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION I , S �.. FILE” NO: SDR 93-0007 FILE TITLE: FRA CESCHI I .. I APPLICANT: Ken & Jerome Francesaki OWNER: a AME I I I 600 Third Street Sad Francisco, CA. 94107 REQUEST: A request for Site Development e1 a p nen t Review vi p w Pp ovalfoanew construction of a 5,000 square foot commercial retail " Y building. I , w APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Section 18.62.050, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120 and 18.164. LOCATION: 11595 SW Pacific Highway. (WCTM /S1 36DB, tax lot 200) ZONE: � C-G (General Commercial) The General Commercial zone allow Public agency c Y and adManastrative services, public 1i c support facilities, professional and administrative services, f3 nancial, insurance, and real estate services, bsaizless support services, eating and drinking eatablaahMexis, among other I uses I I ' , I 1 I I � I I NPO Na. 8 I I NPO C IRPERSOW: Cathy Chase -Y „1 f2O 490 PHONE NUMBER; ,I II CHECK A 4L WH.:Y.0 H APPLY: X ,STAFF;M ACISION COMMENTS DUE BACK'TO'I STAFF ON 1993 • I PLANNIUG COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TI1 ,.7:30 • II I I I II I , . I I3aAPIT Y GS OFFICER DATE E OF HEARING:. TIM] w0ry . I I CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: _ TIM'SmX7•30 ,• � � � III � I,I ATTACHMENTS I I X VICINITY MAP X LANDSCAPING PLAN AN X NARRATIVE II ARCHITECTURAL L PLAN X SITE PLAN X OTHAR: GRADING .PLAN II I . I. I STAFF CONTACT. V.jctor Adonri 639-4171 I I I I , I I I. I I I I I I I M „ • II . I I I t I I I � I I I • I I I 1• I I I I I II • , � I III' , t I I I. I I I I FJ , II I I I' I . I , I � , MIL .I t I � I I I i Y• . .- - • P .. l'a:r.: ., ... 4 — 1 4 — 9 S 6.11 E 13 8 : 2 ? . , ‘: C - in OF WARD, OREGON 2A1-',P.014, , ar ,•,,,„„. . . ... . t , • ..§..1,WAYEL.PlaiNZ JREV I EW__.A01.14S4TION . ,, . . CITX OF TXGARD, 1312 8W Hall, PO Box 23397 . .. Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 POA STOP 0SE ONLY . ... CASE NO. SDR , . . . . : , OTHER CASE NO'Sv, -------4 • , . . , RECEIPT NO. 93- , , .. APPLICAT/ON ACCEPTED ;---- (*) , . . . 02E: ALE- tra -cp :. . 1. OENERAL INPoRMATION Applicaxlma elements submttted: • • . •„, pRopERTY ADDatSSILOCATIONL11 .41., , 41.,,,‘ (4, 4.4 ------ro Applic,,a,u form (1)• '' 4.11141 .-_,,_,n,424;f42i_0', or4i 1111 , ciirteris ignature/written , , . TAX MAP A0 TAX LOT NO ...104"24in421.,9p . athorication • . , . '"*(C) Title transfer instrument (1) 1 IT SIZE ....,4 ,4 6..r 0. ''': <Z5) Assessor's map (1) PROPERTY OWNER/DEED ROLDEOEBANCESCHI KEN & JEROME ._, '-(-01.110t plan (Pre-aPP ebAcklAut) ,.. ‘, . ADDRus 6(0 THIRD STREET PHONE 615 392-5311 ,---(iY Applicatt's Statement . ....................—,..................„" '':. . CITY SAN FRANCISCO , CA ttp 9470,..7.---0.i. .---- (pr - pp cheldit) • . , , ''' .' &"LIELN" ADDRESS PHONE 7. .".4. .. 43' .10ktonvo ...........41.4.0........1 ' '' ' CITY ZIP ,,"61),,iling fee (41,3/ ) ....._—_—_,..—. ........-. ' , When thd owner and the applicant ate different 4--1I) Cohstriaction Cost Estimate 1 ii'S-e-i orrr ..1,. ' ' peoplap the applicant must be the purchaser of re4ditd . ., , or a leasde in possession with written authorization DATE DETERMINaD TO BE COMPLEXE:, from the owner or an agent of the owner with Written --” , authorization. The owner(S) zoNst sigt thid ' , ' ,, applicati.oq in the spaoe provided 04 page two or ' FINAL DECISION DZADLIXE: . . submit a watten anthoriz'ation with tigs application. 1 G010. PLAN/ZONE DMVATIONt . 2. PROPOSAL suAMAgy C ''4 II-G-757'7Ef-Record of the subject property ,. request site development review approval to N.P.O. Number: 11OwPititalmteL....8.Aktgi1C-2. Apptovai Date: ' , ':,. Ar7,..,„... 21 :4__LLRYELY:,. ..AlairdPOittep Final ApprOval Datet . ', ..• Azi.g.:2,,e 616 WIL9s4.1.51:10dift: A' puttmi.tg _..............„...,,---.- . ‘ 4.S Engineeriog , : ... • /. ','"' Revod 5/87 ...., , • •,.• , c,..4. 0,0 -LI>. . . . .„, ..,,„,.....--.....-.....------ J. . . , 4• ,i , - -. , , . 4• - • 1 , . . . i ,.,P,.. r •,bak.i..H ..1 L„r ......1w-�.U....-y.,..a..ilw..,b. _ �,.4..,-n FLL'-�.ri.-.., , 4. 1 4-- 9z 4.a1E'D I 8 m 27 p .. e wY 4 30 1.4,st any variance, coed T=r` .o� x IE' . �?� ii�t�1r n a d lands,yV /q ry }� 7 'GCS �: (�,�3+g �',.,�w application; 0 g 'N h4C, '1s, :4�1�fy' .L.GA E.id is � �a� 0 need to 61.6M 4t k chw n I de r�� the attached orMatlon application!, , at he t4me you 0/Azle thi,s f , 5,s PP • RAl�t n n I • d ' r. 'the abo'�ee ,�e does not violate an each d a • �d deed z imposed 'that as �a c� h ub ; t �a � , the 1 $l granted erc&se the rights l' ' ,R accordance with terms and subject to granted limitations of the Co All the 0� e Ca I I 1 � ��411 l;�A attachments t�� Gs I rind eXhibi; r the + transmitted plan, a � PPlican,ts so acknowledge h� Q�r l�, � ��"txaD and h � pp�;i a�z 2i and ' ;air m4 b4 rev°k If it I,a found that a� ��k aaskad� mox� � are I i. . • D. `me applica 11 t read entire�: �4 �h p�h � the application, c �d �x e p ox a ct � end I cr�� l and I I wry � I Pp , . . or denying the aaiad I I �h 13th � A I I � II • each o c r (ego hi5bft �3d � � subject� C „:.:07;;.al' nrww Il'rY...+^rte•,, ,"441.wnnwL.n„" ".'..f•�1'e I' 10 1. I I• I , —MUnorYw,r ,4"..I.tl 4, m,. , I, I; r 1 1 II, 1' 1 I' , , • I I II . III I I 'I I I •. I I 1 '1 t 4 HI . I i I ii i i I �I I pp t r W r w.Y p I { Ni IN .W W M...1+ r J "V Y wi W aY w M rK L J� i w M W.»L. ..w ..b....J r u J J W J u N W w �M r w .W�� • . .V V r u.4K .♦r u J` h +w w NuJ J J AK• r .wN u .ktiw W ww , I • • I I I 1 }[ T_ -._..r - _ _ _4�. �,.._�,. .0 .,.l.,.l' ..t i,•...u,.� ... i, w� �_ .....WrrJ... ! '• I I I I I r I • I I I I 1 �Ir .. ! - �`fi ��..` �,, .,k ,.,.... ,gayr,u.u9rs:.+�,+r✓w w.t-4_ _ -d+..,»„n„„u:�,,,.0 .-aa.-- '�....,.. «...w7.,°''. r '•., Y 1 I I , , I I � J , �A r I. I I. I a e,r l',,', lal..z, c1 11 f+1.r rslu :W' ++M ..ny:xyri J , n I, • o• a nr, ..,r .b .�y( tl +� ++°,``��!!x. {� y@� ,I ,.1. z r v� �*�' }�r t 1 �ir,){,, p ;�r �p E., gg p' 1� ,� ; ,,f 9 �« , AIIB r� { �' {1VGy. r.�.r �;`�P �`a��' 1�br'.'r�rd��e,G�t�u. '�, ��.+. �rl, '1'��M:e �!I.' �k�i.we'�:wa.��"' �' 1�4i�.%f ar ��'YUY..�.�r C: r er1�K,_w 1 11 a y C' . nn In .ct, 1r kl 1 . ,q � �, { i„e It t F N.4�14;1aA7�+1 I,J',n i' I47iri'adn3 l 1 X1„1,, 1Int l: t.,,'. T 9.,9i4 N uiq} s,y pp a 1,,,ry t' r ,81 11 dF I:A.(1 1 , 4 r.I F,i'll,!y 1+ ',•1A∎, rw v r, tiIi1 4, ''.11 Y,7.1,Y w . r r k �YY ,)R r., a 6 k ir', E'`4 11,; (:l t,1',$ r a Crk.n'q VF t l C "' � w 3!' �K4, #14X D,. :,,■V; 1 1"4 ;1 I I;,, , r "',ti11 w" '''t; %I :`b1.« ,i X, „',1 k1- r0:411 I•«} t"l't'. 87r,"'1,:) .:1,;, 4•v1.i"' r..f,.4"Vtvif,"11ri,r riit,`1 t 14,rlt 1:::41"r1 1,'it,' i, , y e:i^I.t.,.'1..I.0 4X M.+A.4.1.9.0414117 01.1.b✓iMwl 1.11,4 tfttt.,At 1rH.,,,G •r �11Y WdIN1�x.r ix'1 HY -*-* =Arlr.1 Wm.Y1r. �11 N.NK.I�M1.WN.wM I ,, I I •F ,/ rTeI�V1 1.441 nql Icit C �M11 �Mt {�t tf..N . , ••• Y a 1,', C'.' 1r MwV�«rL.,OP1��,'It'l14,1'1„ hrI 1re,,"j", �ia,M/.A'� il,',Ii.::A 1'w*, K In .1 n I GH1 Wu q I,)1 I� �� v Y 1 r��4 ' I y�r I i I I I I • , I I I I I I � � � � I i I' I I � u I I ' " I I I I I e„ I I I I 1' "* 'I I , I I I ' , I v , I I I I" I I I • i ICI ,lip I I, � 1� � � � I'I� I' i I 3 . I I I . I I I I I I I fi I , I I I '101 �F 7 J J, o '1 r - '4 1 r 1 . n • 1ti 0 • • , • OREGON BUSINESS ARCHITECTURE PC. NARRATIVE Site Development Review CITY OF TIGARD 11595 S.W. Pacific Highway e's April 12, 1993 • The property owners propose to demolish existing service station building and construct a r 1, one level commercial building to be leased to a furniture retailer. pating_ans11.0.0stng 'or (13) standard size parking spaces (including 1 handicap space) are proposed, exceeding • minimum required. Limited inventory is brought to site from a local manufacturing facility via a step van during off peek hours. Most merchandise is delivered directly to customers from the manufacturing facility. No staging or special loading areas are required. .• • crime Prevention ai ca_l_Safety Window, will be located on the south side adjacent to parking and on the short east wall adjacent to landscaping. Doors will be located only on the South Side, adjacent to parking. Parking lot lighting is provided by 250W BPS on 20'-0" standard and (5) wall mounted fixtures on building (see lighting plan). Accessand...Cimialiqu No additional curbcutsidriveway aprons are proposed, Both existing driveways from pacific Highway are to be maintained in order to provide adequate circulation for automobiles and , emergency vehicles. Pedestrian access is provided froth right-of-way to retail building via sidewalk and striped crossing at parldng lot. aradingEati A conceptual Grading Plan is attached. Minor changes to existing grading are proposed, Catch basins are being added to site to minimize runoff to right-of-way. Finish floor elevation is to be approximately 18 lower than existing service station floor level to accommodate handicap access requirements. ' • 621 SW Alder,Suite 530'Portland, Oregon 97205•508/228-9747 FAX/241-0702 -0 • I I• , I i - � .,.d,,,M .�-.., .M.T„i,...,,it_,., .,.,..«a..,,,1.........1_ ,.,I.._. .,_.W_,... M!i,,.,.,.,.,,.a. ..._.,1..-«I.a» ...,t.,...1,..,1-„»,�.,......,._,..-,...,.�_.:..�.+>,...�.,....., »..,_. .+,4... . I.,..:h,rr..........�,M., .. ,..,„_..,...,,•,.,,kU_a•,.,n.,.•u,-�a..»u...__I..�.r-.,_...,rv,t,,.-1 ». ., r I I I • I . 1.. • Applicant�cant nInder t nds that 1 two sided, free standing sign is allowed on site (70 sq. ft per • • face) and building wall s igns are allowed for r u to 1 5% of wall areas Tenant will apply fo r I . j r separate sign permits before erecting any signs. I , I 4 ' I Ovvnor/.Applicant Agent I I I • . . I Oregon Business Architecture itectnre P.C. Attn: Daniel Young �. 621 SW Alder; Suite 530 Portland, OR 97205 • I I ' I ct • • • I I I I +III. I I 11 n I • ♦ I t, I I , •. I I I I I I I • , I I I I I I I 1 r I I I II II i I I, III I I I . I I , I � I I � i L. j d,l • I I I I I I , I I , I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , • 1 �• s t • • .�...,-,.,.±C�'. .,I..:,.......�.,;..w.l. .,.a ..-.......,_. ...,..I..,. .._.r ,.,.Iw , �. ...-.»„�.,..M........._...._..:J ...,...aa.. ....wa._,..,4,1..._.d�.,..a.'i� ......�,...Ir, ......._._._., ,..,.�..._..u.,,.�._.� ..�,-,-._._ _ ,..,..,. t 4 •c I' I • . I I I I I ,I. it I. I I I 1 E OR ON v• I • I BUSINESS I it : ARCHITECTURE EC, , a � TA I a//�� I , I I . I I 1 1 f' I t ro 1 I I I I ' 'raffle +. :e .Qn Estimate:.'' I I • . RE: Proposed ed 5000 s.f: Retail Building at 11595 SW Pacific Highway. • Furniture Store (Tenant) is currently located adjacent shopping center. The store manager provided the following information: I I , ;dent St , Monday & Friday; 10AM to 8a 1 I I ,; I. I I Tuesday, Wednesday & Thursday: 10, to 6P1' , Saturday: 10.A.IVI to 5PM I I S un a Y� 12PM to 5PM , ." .u•� Customer � I 1 ' t,', Number of custpmers• on weekdays: 8 to 14 customers per day.p I I , I I I a I •"1 1' �, 1 customers er .� c1 S s l toy. I, d 12 o �eeken 1 �� n � ber of customers hT n� P' Y I I I I I I 4' I I I I I I I . I I I I 1 6i I . i I I I 3 I ■ Mme• 1,1 I I I , I I I i I 1 I I I F . I I { I I I , I r I • !. 6 .. I 62 SWAidei,Suite 530 0 Portland, Oregon 97205 4 503/2289747 AX.,,‘241-0702 F'i' J I 'I Il I I F rya' ,d. I ' 1r• F ' • 41 N Aw , r ' • I { I I i 4` I / 6) I I t I r . ', • ,,, � . . //J, etti � v', .+e . , 5 dii07?.,„„y' eet'ilie6.?,444, 1 •`fr ' . . ' ' ,;.', ..., ,'.:, ., . I s l6 P • r • I i C I V Ca,Li5; lr G r' 1 I t I I� r ,: . ,., .,, pI. .. . .. .. . . , . 1 .. I a I . . .. . . . ,. . . . . , , . . . . . . . . ., , . .. I .., . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . , . . . ' ,;" .. , . . . i i . . , . . . . .. . . . „ • .. ,. . . . . . . . . . , , ,....,.: . !,, ,,,,.: I t : .. . . , !� I L., ., (l.,: 1 , .... ..,. . . .. . . . ., . „. . . , . , . . . , , . , . . . .. .,.. . ! .1 .. . . , . . . . , .,‘. ,, , r,.. ,. . , . . .. . . . . , . . . . . .. . . , . . . . . . , .1 . J.,. . . . . . ., . . ., . . . . . . . . .. , . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . ,, . .. . . • . . ,,,., , . . . . , . .. • ,,, ,. LI .. I . , I I i„,,,,,,,!.. ,..., ., . .. i , i ■.• V "\,.. r n 1 r I I I Y \I l3i .. a, I 1 I .. . . . 1 + ! 1 . ! • 1 I • r • • Q I I I r . UPI, , \ , -1 ' ' ;"- , • g ' 1 '1 • I 1 Y . ,. ,i' • 1 1r• h i 1+,� i' X Z; :p.• .., ,:, , H . ',,1,"Y .• . . • I .!,a, .•, ..,.. ,.. , • , „ ..,, ,„.,„,/ .. • „,,, , ,. . •,.. .. , , •■ ^ '' 1 . , 4't 1 ;,1/11, . 11, 1. 1 1'1 •Y IX 1 I 1 I I I r ♦ I +.1�' 1 '1 \ I, J ‘'":Y "• / 3• 777 1 e'. Y i .• 1 Q n { • `l. ,pc,...) .1i,,,, • ``fir 1 , N ' 1. � 1 I I • � • ) 1 �'''' � 1 r 4q� /. ICI 1 10. l .. ! �= 1 1 • ' . ig. 1::- I I I I I . I r I ' rril ' .:' . . 6 1 ! I r I I } i1I. IV • II . I . • . I I 1r I 1, • { 1 • I f 4 I • f , I. I w I I t 4 4 • 1 I 1 { r l I r I I 1 I 1 I I I I ♦ "Y XX I l':;:1 I I r ♦. • •Ir 1Y •x I ♦W i , I �p •i••i�,d. III 1'. , ,f • '/1'; }tVC rf ••,' jr •' 'A.'• ' •777.C'.....>' •4 1.,..* • N ,. .•• . , .„.. Aic.-.1 . , ,. ( e • 3>1 I , : d . ti � � .r « + �. � . ` • "'' rr '" . �i ' ' \'.R „' ,l.\7 . ; i f !. .f +;f..tr 1 lr,.rN 4 ,dZ .. " . ,› . , ,4,', i-IN, , i,\.„ •,.+.Y ''� { .tai r, « • i ,�.(�/ �"S {,:/. { T ; ; / • j♦`gyp` 71 1 , r v' [ ‘4,..',,,,,.., N r4. 1 ‘, , ,, ,,,$„ . .. , . .t.:.). \ : t'S.-6' t. ' . ' \‘ t i.,,\ .„ ''''L.°:, .',.›).4/,,,. ''''.4..,,,,,_„:: ,A.,.„ . ,, �4' 'r ti w"+�...., 1� r'f it iN� P` �.;' f i�/, " .,. M No+' - ' \ •�+d M�� .Y ,�} .may,.. • tKM R �,. •' "Xw', �4 �,� '«a i M , z �Y. tea:, «.µn 1 may, ' R } • n ,�.,N ,w u 4tii� ..f• rfRy fr '�F r R ...- ,, ., °..)''',,ess- ,,z,,,,,,- . ,...':,..',„'-'..'--- t.) ,z Z30----.-.-r--,,,,_.„, ,-.L. .., ..,,,t_.0.0.s.,,,,..,..,( ,, , ,,44,4/...3,,, . , ,..,.,• t , '', ' 1 ' ..--,..,-, ', ••.,fr , , , tF„Ol,,,','" . 4,.,,,,,,-- " H..",;,, , '"1"*.,,,'Z,,..,v.', '',...,,,, , '',:-4,i, ,', , , ke,', ....ii‘` 471,,.,' , •'', ,' • ' rr „•,y +. ' , , , ' ''''' ' ...•''' '•''0 14 ' ' ' '''''•' •''.'' •''.•'•• .''•' ' '1'4,°.''‘ ''' • '' ', ''' ,4 I, , '4'.'. I ,*0'..A,'''•' \'' i , 14 ...c4 ,,, ''' ' ' '. ,' 'v ''''' '‘ ' .<,,,,.:„ , ' ,',...-,..,' '', . ,,, ', ',',. ,,.''.,,',','‘,,,, ., , , ' {sir .1 x «-.+" . . , ,°-' ,„;40,t`O' ' ' '.., ',''..'. ... 'Ei04 vff.-1 . .. , . ‘,//' .' 1 "� 11 ! Aid' f -. y \l 4 t' ._ -__.--'-___ - - - - - - - - - J._ m..-"- • _.------ -� -_ _ ®- i • y 7 i. -• -- - - - --- _ Ti _ _ - 7 L-Icet-tr•Ft:_r(suira=A. ,i..- r _ -� r2. 4 I ._ 2__ -_... _ _ _ u d R ' -4---Cign2oLs2r° ‘644191r i-f.P -- i-leg•--= :.: • _ _- iv._ . .: _ _ .. . . _ •.. . _. _ _ .... . _ _s . . 4 _. ... .. / — 1. . :... q, a • _ I s _ . i gr • _ _- r } r r - - n _ „ L :- - hatAidapiar• lip_ - _ _ _ - _- _ -- Iiiiii • ....611111PrAillirr _ - a . .. s H - • --' '1, .i '_-- — = : _ -'GRADING pLAN _ . N . e, , . , . , _ , ..• 8 -- _ t._--,dze:30---011 4-12--lea- ., ,/ - - - _.-..„N- _ : _J _ - _ - _i o. --N _ li= ___ z �i ..� _ _ - _ _ y , . . ''''..N\NNNy/CN. /7..... 7' i ,.,._1 _ �• �_t!--.-.-..--,;.:-... ......: ....„,, / ,_, ,,, ,_. , : "Or . _ 1 • -- L _ ' l A—, ` i -- • - .. , ; _ _ ' / :, L._ , . _ - - _ - -t 4-12015 - -- - - - .. , : / N_ - - j L A I jI r II r - - - --- - - . W L Cis !1i is - AL / ,1 _ "- \: .0-nt-.1.1 - . / i/N 0 -v-:, v2) ,JActRutkicti-4-r1 t5112. 1.4 i -. 1 cikt, p34-tb l' ,---- _ - / --0 , - . w 01, ii V1ad 04 %: ® � . . ,,// -Pi)0 ' --:-.- . . _ . .4 .3414 lucit.it4 ,, , \1\NN7/ - AI* , - -0-' N\ //4 - - 4)M prr4 s -. ... .. I 60,4---- . =_ --_- -- 40, *cr. ifffr- viNer tlAtrt...... t-4111-11 Z- .ff cb 46- , °`'��; �I�i'�o .* p er 7 _ =__- a- Stony � 1*(01141.. 1 -{{ ,, mss,mom►= t� 46, ' 1 - - ---'Aar-,41,...0 Al,,, ,z Ap-. , ,-,iltr",,b- 4%1F.--411,..-. _ ( P-F-P. lit-r.' 1"' r-' 17' l'IAPLie- . i ' n� _ 'y/ � Inc �1.�/� '� � �r tt A{�t� fib' 'P+ �� 0,-- . "ram = : `'. - _ _: a _ !:=� A'-. _ f: . f I I . , r ' : .. ' 'f ', '.. •4' � Fob a ", n• y.� ! w 1''h.-i",r ;v F,..y„�, �w�. : 'i;�;,,,�,, t 9 , 4. 1,4,, Vt., 9 r! r•. ,A,.1,,,,...:1,.,,N„,,;,',#), +; ,e,;,,I :4 its+tr ,. �t 1:';,Ill.;(".,: 'V'. ' kr , i.' ".'' y '4'i. ,,:,,,/,r� .,~w Ant*CRAW-Ei IS0N ••r • 1. ' •16-d00 Watt.' r, CS Archiectural,Area;Lggrit ,. �, .u k!. tr. ;`• Concbur�e,dl r.' ''''.1'..'A.' ,. '.i, ''1; j ( ',.''•V`,.' V',,• t A>;,. ,,r .. . .., , . Concourse III Is the most versatile,functiona,,,,• ' designed,universally adaptable outdoor lighting . • r;'�...„ designed, available, Through a variety of Mounting styles,aai 9 Y 9 Y f it offers afamily of IoW profile sharp cutoff ; '. 18 3/4” ' ��`� luminalres that make optimum use of today's ' ' . high output HID sources, Uniform in'!appearance and•compact in size,this . ', • ' •�t'�''4 �� . 8 11d (sr.��uare polo) single piece soft-cornered cast aluminum s 3/8”(wound Pole) •,. housing offers the designer a unique opportunity in,lighting flexibility for all outdoor �' . applications, Enhancing'natural landscapes as A well as cityscapes,Concourse ill brings „, ' I ' outstanding performance and style to 5 5/6' . walkways;parking lots,roadways,loading j ''� , ; 1 cl• . , docks,building areas,and any security lighting �, t a lication• k ,f , if . �1; ,.,•. Yy A yyi�ir;c, t I x4,00,T,'.` o. i*, , •f:4, ,,,fy,• '` I�p i^ .� .rl.` 7�,t k�4rC , �[.+a� p�';�"C`��y;t;�Zt4ji �,. 7/13'-----. r, i°1 as . , , ' Design iFeatures • ' Designed for single or multiple units on square styled mounting brackets,metal halide or high or'round poles,�side or top mounting with low to pressure,sodium lamp types,Concourse,i l l Is the high level lighting,perimeter or median patterns most completely coordinatedtlighting concept in , of lights undireotional or multidirectional rotation the Industry, •';'' .. of optical distribution,mast arm or architecturally ,. '�uao springs-stcei,quick release latches'on housing for i ,' 4.. .- ' !• 'easy opening,closing or complete removal of door 'i'•' � - without,the tree of teals. i� i' � � , } • Porcelain screWir sh eh,type lanrip socket el/ith spring-{ loaded center contact, (Metal'Halide supplled4tith I, . )' poeition•oriented mogul base.) ie �I atr: i ° i 1 aesthetdcai P ieasi soft-corner de3Ig» ,e,, I r Areatitectural dark bronze polyester powder coat I , finish. ,, If 1 dlosed cell gas4filled high temperature silicone \ , }} • , gasketi»i: Completely seals aptita!system from dirt, , '� • ieugsr'or tither forelga9 Material. i ' '; • .' One-piece hydrotermed finished aiurttirrittin tetilectors .i 4, . • provide thee different optical distribations and,�sharp° • cutOtt control. :1 i `� ��• »itrersai mounting clarrtp concealed in haiisirlg hit l "r t �� 1 �s ; _. __..,, .....'„ F f 112 k+to �31gr'6:D,horizon l tent ns ltlioh�� i ��. , reiilulring adarpteirs of rrealrrai�gement of component ' • pai4t Protrideis a:+6°Verticai leeeling adjlistfl nt., � ` ' Easily t'emri.otlattle high polder factoti,>uuiti-tap N117 _ 11 �1' ' • ballast,�stanF�eirdl� .i-brr.-. .,r. ''I 4'11!)i.. . ',.';,.7.7„,,, , . ,i, 1 • integral hinges prevent'door rocking and optintiites _ , ' ' , ' ' ' ' sealing'capabilities: Lens is tiheirnial siiiibk aril i"tnpact»resistahit clearitemperled glean, • , • ' I • . , ;' , r �.0 . ^"r nti., ,hr-xUb•, ...,..-.k-... ,.u.,.Mm_'...,._-,...n:»..•...,,: .,__,,.,,4«�..,.,-a.,.�.»...�...,...x...s,,...,...a+w.,.w,.....-„,rwua....y..,..u..�.....a.,».r..a.»,,..«..u,..._,..,...i..,.........,...x..,..._„�..w....- ,.,........,_..w,.,. „»x�,.�.....,..,,i.u.4.A..,..ay:x.w,4...,r....ax.�....+iw....rw..,...,•w..,,,.,, ...k:r,,.,,w I '—'71'..'1°,' _ MIO .n r ��'�” �� i� p . COT M "E1 i r.V• Z i�- SV v n bl MI >:l < c SW 0 1NS N t}4F tl Nj;>y SW 7.,E �}I� _ 0, r +. A ((��■7� I e Ue • In! , <7 S t_ 4''/e, w i )1 )y`(.•. UyylrC�+KuINSUN�y� SE ° +�}� i(t#1+',7 15 W LDCU.^,`Y p - t �A ,y„.N '`1MV �4� 11 {.R y 41.•f•T 6 COMU 1�� a tiJ < Y �( PA4,AC7EHA T ' ,pbRitM'b Z. y ` j ,yr_'.<, .11c '< ` 'w Q > ' rtco rtcil Q R� ,/A• IK71.1.NA +,J' I SW ' y�,,moNA I 51 "”, . �1 (``��` ' t�.>' . sry 5 Tr:"•��'" I1 fuJ y '.< �" w. •ubol GTO,6t • eugrnNaioN t > /HA' LII '', i � : ps EfE!'� e� `W RH ' `1� .y �) Yt+A 11 +{y „r ,.,,, ,N,°. i'1,1,y,,� r.,,,./ -� 1' �`, ..�` ......� «,. !._. "" � +,W ., Olil"I IIN+,rIN yl� 7a ' ya ,: r, k .• C /Q h cop Ake � 1 S 1• 32 kr. j 'J B i„ .tn, .I',PALM 8 1,,, , N, ,r „.. , � Ms ri a a �' 1 th i - ,� �N eYCxtT �4. r1.µ i', Ms r 00 TIOAR• ` �+ SW NTNtI ti �•,r`v 4HV uit ., P DW ,:•I '.Wi=r IN y. 6°PghitA f4Q,,`4NT S •.� • '14`. ' U'A . Pi ¢¢ 1 aS 11 •'t 3UNrrilw wi<e ,,MM ay „1Y 4,...t......•.....,, , p i; t F tw ri.r A ? . ( t'�• 51 ,,at nr'L t•�, � .''� ( L �,�y,,� �+w • .,.p ,�, may' y 4l0S� jet r_, ,v '41 S V C■i 1 I ti$w i• ` r f '..sry 4 <,, y y, rA Ta4 D,I OLAS w . Ytl r';,_ ' / `t'i't ,,c:,, s,.. ,it ,•' r , yitL�c,�:; , i /Af'p� �iAIUUiN (' .I,I..a un ••• , ' ..�..r.: '� r•I :� x.w, ( & • I ,,� cr •T, Cr'ygC% Calf -krt„, ��t:11, v'\.'. �,`' Kakq_R `� �� S .�. iLMiyfFt't! ... ..�-It ELMNUHST ST ,^ .y,ar _ ♦�,, INMEIR∎�",y't� �+ ^� .- yp" �" W t' ' , . ' '., tir i .. &me ' 4 R <1 O i1 N GIY N •,. r N fi•,OR 4'`""yA .4•;e, .,r�.-.,,+.c�C!' ,'4 ,r J1 ,• J,O ° . kr�11 , 1 i i 4, fry 1 v. ki 4 i�f z 1 /'N� , ,f 1 kV/q s r' p' ' \ko .' " 2 •v E . r r I, �., IN Sf „ `, < ArnfN•; . .. . , . rF. ; "r io,. err � I 1 LY `! Y`�� O�s1[E••u a p p 5 d.41-+� s p u f^, s ct* a4,, c �/, ;Q 5 x uti ,j, u t CRCEA"� k 4 + L'T-V� L, � i w �� sr nw1r. ..� �'' I:�I. +� 4 4�c o11p�yi• �... Q• �: a .4' ,�. ,,� 'ter, ..q� , ,� 1 i J,,) .w'-."n• ,j II1VITG �sr, f2., vAt F i •......... C{I R'V, ,i p• } i'A�f sMa,. rlk+ F 1. t'i y ,, ,r• / $ SW ev.„I. S b Eo' & MELRO5w' 4..•+ 1 17Y �rlp i{, Yi A ,,,... SW<VANNS � GpR.,.'t +IS �' yr R .,, , • C , 't + P e I e i MAN• MLL ,' •�i�.+Y 4 14 41114 r' S J -- .� /�; A'y.y.., t,' ^Mr 61 '+•L ,:::,....7, t. r,` I "'�, (C x * O'. ,Y +,o'�Lj /S �) V/iIR t V yr ["'w r ti ..P4',,, ,",It �, m, lh SW �' P .3y ► i rin 4010'1 w��fr�j!��r P ,e ^!,' rC7 l,f ' '•1 - ^ y .w < Av ,. CbV R q bFN LN ,'-'. '--,,. . ii Q•Ji'1"',-' 4 0 . AST an D .mi rrr1Fh,, `j 4 5�. P � ! . I N� _ Rt.1'• 'AN' stL '.•, r Dr" tl'`1, ,,ittii 1� aH// `«, ( 'w�, �I,L ' ,�C.jr 1y. I*.... . Q!. m ,, 6T .� 4-..io .i{.:'L? h+ PAUiKVIAt••01 % 4 b ' '' , 4.#4> ", ', , w NdIMtW NI•L�W arc �� `' �� {hioq�•l��`�'�� ,� oNC Hlltl 1 I/ r • yy i, VIEW b7�H '�• W 16CH V� RUS r,L$ I •'� ' 5 ' R�i � r• '� ..A+ CINIER ��-., p �- � � 4 w a ELR.i{E' +•'" -�• BW N•MA u p ^'.c""`' ; Oq bA ., G AbQd G1R 1 W x SW MEADOWS'I...,. '�USk d c ,/ • I,,, Q� W. '�. •i"',•„�_•,,Syy y ND A., ' ' 1 It., ..'j t _w_. hl ' ;, t- �'r ,.,. 1 ',V ' A. j i L ^t F7r cT Qr,l w ) VIkW r t W OMINS,;4., A� - I �yy l �' LN S .1��1, ' NQ•. t{i•I*c . ',SLR ' � � �V ''�' j 7), I S' W �EIONITA I ••ate Is-an's,. ,nlc:•1•'I''�• lk ' a'. • r1,', r�+r EGGpEMoN1 .•_ •,�_"O`�' ,,' 4... ..°f�„, T' '- I 'n ...�...�.r� ...... .4N ,'.Ea-. 'TWIN Flb _ i. M, 'J�N BWi114 8tti�•K �T s 4 I�y f; �. mr �� 3w 7i(nPa gkNl r ..r,..., U UN�_ ---Op�� ; (J F �. 61 Q�. ( a, 4;' mss L + !.• K i •w Ib ` �<> iIIOW 4J 5W Ar nt1' LK O11 x s i, R IR d ` `, ,IVAL'UGA' WY I' y.- i LL A YN= Q� ., - tr 1 k•• ( ff '. ..-� �!+IR' 1,,4'` ,�1� P�ZC.'k5ll. .I w'u h DOUGLAS•SW s y•SyM�lttSllt A 1', a a• tWlc A I s SNAgsr.ASI " bALEINE' 1, R/' �' „+ " CIR.} c 1 } U'rl EL i,DAWN i T tit' Cf S �L R sOPO 5T ( ' r•.,,eL..• j' ; gYlb y,. t ]E�.,dRC M 1:,i,i!„biv t':,y 4 i ,[Iwd.. - '1.HO"i- d i�t �� a _ R �,,,. ;�+ : ..Uir�A� '�{P �✓' '• C e.. ,�nNELO ,i I i I C6 N`i l ,6 1 < 4" ga ' .. GROVE ST i �, SW kiidLt sr ' a < c > - M d a Ml' PO "Ii"Ip 4Q' "� `.,--- I & 1,‘,.„1, � KAeIE h r a P �7. t."" a ' t sw N'w SAila nA q ,Iy' � sW b ryy a, � .,. i 0 �'�LN i'1`t" IN fc S .( F.¢ ,L L,.:. 'on NsWt+ri,� MI,V•i E 4.,,,,,.6 p W ",.t ..i I i. T} O t1 L 1, 1�'gNIH t t7N I, u ¢ K h A T 3 � wl 1 l ¢ER 9 ,L�iK� A ,?, 1, ' 't. Obi fSi) j V t I ...4�AV y 2•,6a00� Q Z �" ii�� , / 4{ J < 9WjI .�'.w �._. \_ ' °5N 5EVILL�a � � �p°� UWM4 �' �•, 1' '^k � �JnVVr1O '.'. 87 N n p -{ 's m n. b t • 4:::z,: I ,t .�• j AM '' v � I� °' '. ,..> �i�AYL�.i 'F'°� tE. ';''''0* .L at, R 1 i0a06 s, + 4..t 4112tfS 1 6 a., I 9' ryNq o. y' Ir 1's 15 .. „ t / d� % 5r_ / », .f TrGARtI Ll sw i a y litre '. 0 `., i,;. BA �t,` ir�S S i+ l• . Rt d cixir• .N)u (is / I r0l' C(4 ,s, 1�i v}i�' ' u" �,i y -Via',p•� (M "°u. li ,.q, 1:4-',, Pu, d ',, ,1 �' Iv _ ....W. ../I ''� 0 . ST,tinii'NIA 'a 8 I '1,t• III I ° •,0 l•,' , . I' . .'qt' , � �� t.4V, �W iir18.� �. <��±,o`.'-r-:...-+.•�•Ab�SQ• PO� .bL �i 1•� ' r%•EEII�Q'�0� +.wA 1 QPO roUHN M. u::. ' � � ,O I �, � � Gt!' ,yyp�s .. T Z ��' +j. `. r^. ,''., tlWOOb �{U'viA�1 ..r 't" ��.� 'i°'x'q �.. • ,.(K... tr y ( ' ,j.',., A ii i /,r(I 1 p WILLOW L to:,, 1 i. 4', ?, °ip Q' —� i OUHIIAAr , W I + vfi 45 9' I 7#717-'—''' J,. air a��x I { �� "�r _ )) .t E• A' - � � � t. .�.i f��r .,ti&Gnr,i..c.rr, t.�.,..,>� ..«.......,,..M«» w.w _., >I. w 5e •.I.iWpd.t �t»1c1w IW J�Y»...,.wYIEYi.� , • • y • tt � � � i , � .. � � to• n I i i I, , 'I I Ili ,i a • • I4•V 1i , . ', t,1 ' . 1 W..)r)?tc►n COU My ' i ' , 1 (,,+ ' WHEN N RECORDED RETURN TOr 1 e .:', w X11 � i „I : ' ' I , I OH R ERTxES i 600 3rd Street . San Francisco CA, .94107: I i i w s r i a sA, As ,EovE , , Y +w t1t M i i 1 '1:; � TEXACO nn yyN�,yIy ��M�ry)� /► oration for and in: . , M' I �I:ILIG�V 61E�A1fU A�� ,>ti1�i/' �N�'`��\d r � ��i f1��+� �►Qr ;,,; ,u �4'�'it«MG r� 8 ' '1. .1.', 1,- : ` consideration of the sum I oi' TWO HUNDRED SEVEN'TNOUSAN) FIVE HUNDRED and P1O/1QO I v )1 ' i 4 4.,.4 ($2O7,5OOWOD}.'dollars, and other valuable eonsideratians, the receipt of which' , e rid convey.° • � ,�.. � ��,,,_''�� is hereby, acknowledged,-does hereby grant a y �ko'�e�nnoth francesch9, e : : ;,, , tarried man, and der r'rances�chi, ail that real property corwnonl,� known as i, h a Y County of Washin ton State of �1� � 5+ ��' Paifc �di w Cit of Ti ad C , , � W Pacific '. 9 ► y Y g Orwegon, more' particularly described in Exhibit A",, attached hereto and {, , ,s i ncarp orated' herd n b thi S reference ' 1 Y p y , 1 try 'r` ; SUBJECT 'TO the covenants, conditions, restraetiOns, reservations, ; I i - '''` encutnb ante's aenss and easements now of recod. '' •:• i :f ;„ �a ' ii'01' THIS instr�urent will not allow use' of the property 'described 'inl Ithis , , , i ry a ul ti ns Nef�re rt:. nstumer�t 'iniolation,of app l,'c�,b1elartd� os' la ar� , Y a .q ' ` ' s i gn i'n9 or accepting this instrument, the person acgui Y'l ng fee „ti tl a to� the � ' 1 a i. r.r) uld� check t ith the ap.,ro , ning departrreent p pet�ty'sha PP prime city ©r county1ar1 . ;rk�il 'to Verify .approved uses. r; t 1 IN WTTN1SS WHEREOF) Texaco Refining, and Marketing Inc: has caused its' 1 ' i. ��nnppy.��/ y, 4 .,, � _ � _ o be P' to natiie and seal to be afi:i ice ' ttcrty andh s i�n trment t i . .1 .. f-:' . i xecUted' by its Regional Manage' and attested°by an Assistant Secretary thereunto' duly, authorized this /t' day cf 5c15 r ,1p92.1.'�, :, r f I• (,-.)wrzi ,``.ae.1.2", SH!TsGTON CQUNTY TEXACt, REFINING ANb ARKETINO 'YND..�tiL,±,\' *is.'" ,. ,�•, ,j -/ 1 ? ° ' ,. °fir R�*AL 1�i?OP' fl relo$`FF'iq' To,e., �;' �� Y 1 ' 1� , ,1 7"y 1 „"i� „r:^•' °'+ A+t� /J.ryt ii w'/,,,/ i .M +! w1,' Y.j i,' 0 + ,d {�+w�.�..�+•��1 t+� W i•yy-+y-��p�w,,jar / �� °"' Y I r+,�',• I', ?.f �, ;• /t�' r. I QY-10. F kt, PAID bA}, , r ,i .k., '.,,t r '44,,, �V,; + 4• ^'.°'Sr'''^• .+�' rnrra" 1'v _ inatirwl.iour��L_ ��jj ►' M i1 r , P► Ir ',L+ L l` ' l ''Y ��.• r y d I Nr, f ABC t' ' ,, , , , I j . , , I M n 1 i, , , ., 11 �tr" ,� , n>!r+i I,.,. "_,„�,„ ,.,.. , •.,,,. .-,,,,.•,. , .`., A .,�',Vt�,,r' i,ifi.: y.•,.'.\,f tt1,';?r -••ly'+i �r1J•'•rliV fy-•"''i,!''R4rrj±.{"'•r �i,t!.,,.,,:•_5r„+,r:,•...vrrC 4 r r.:."..; ....�'' .' '±.'4� t 1 t.4e,, �i) ,0• +, G1� + . 1,■ ,r Y ,'t ... ,'r! �. �,l Yr ' r',',il;t L•' Y1, j V,• ' 4 p , .'A.Gf ,'■,'1 +, 5.I1`•"� ;�r ,/rr,, :i 'ri'Lt 'l,,�"y L'' ` ,,1,,�: y+,,,}IY �'1°'y ��p'i' ;;�r(�y, �`/r'1,' �j,rt , ., .y,,�rl�• �•` wj 'i�''•i' �' .d .,Y, . iri .`it.�,' ,,i•.0,�t�.-„,�r,,'1t,1 il:l1•{1:••l;'i1'1w,)`�r,'`.4,1.,, 3,i'7ll40t,,.i�,11�4 l+'° Y W)dllr ,�,'t`1%%• y!t.'r:11'I Y�"7I'ly�1`r-'":% 1ttfry��t,,,,�ti �'ii, ',i ' . '. ,� m. A 0 ,r,��Si+�.� IjYrC x''11 i,i'',r Jt•b�iY''ti�usit i,,,r�i1'.it i+�!,It,,y�:`I' ,t,i''rr r�i�'r{%�i 4+"''�`�' J1��1' �J YA,yal.h,f lw rr,ft tf 4,«r,7E � 1) �.�,./�YI l.1:7?•r°��'+l•..1�^J,,,�e1 j. �(' .' +f. , �.1, :J'Y, ,.,•Y/•''A `»r.1{ i ./& !4 4 •,r14 �.f•�',5 ".;1Y ( lv r 1 .„dl ) ,+ l,t E,�,..,,r 1.. f „. • ff'' ,1;. • d 1 Iy�"' f�,,• �v, °'. .rt., fl a •3 9 1, 4 ., , ! {{ .f• ",444't•'t r 7 A . + r"t ti! .� �, .jr};r+>t"' u ti i 1 u L+' M �,{"•1 rP y�1y(JJj/' 1 '�+ ,�` i, iL ,. r ,Jur 1 6 fc', t 1J.r � �,L :n., �• � �};},, N � Ay?l�. r ��r"�I' ili �') ��j,'�'•I�, +, ' V � r i Z'!,1 1••, i � I � ' (1 r a'�”� A" 6,�..S, t• �1 � 1 � �'�, � 1 /, , +'j i H f !J.` 'I%4`�i 1101 1: 4t 1., 1:'4. !Y+'4' (,i, '� �,,,Sri S.J:• i 1 i•I r w'-',S*P C: ,�rli, ,e;: `f i i �,L.,y C' t,.l+ �', ' � �~'� Zr ^ '£�rt' Y.t�� !, 'J b4 ,i{•i Y t',' ,',' :�•',+iy,1. �"a 1•drJ.l Y ,1 f. „ 7.4t��„1��1.,, t ., r,� , , Y:•�.W' 4�_ � 1, . r,4',,•,i t Yb' ',,,4 ,'rhs+01,,,,.,,,,,A,t,4,41k,,i,14/ -:�7,'r`+:, ,;;/ ,.,.+,..'..a'';', 1 .1`i{+, .41;1'r t", ‘..a,: 0* ir•d (Ni,,"i,._2' 1 .8 ,'rt.t`9,,,'»,1ripitii',f,t,i)Y4 ma, , 741. u,3rJ ,w t� ,. •�,� ��f � 1,, `�y ,'.,,` � , .;,.p � � it �' .Ir '�.t � y�1, ,,.r '1. 4.• �� t,. . L.,., }k'{ �; �,��' r�. 2,6" ' 1 4 1� •� ?+,r,� I.+,'4 , !, ,,.4' f" V " , F �. , �,(r,� f+ 1 �i{+ lii, :�ti,(�'.Xi �IN1 i' ,f, ,r .i.. �,t'+,� �•1 u""S�t;{ .i r, y ';fit .^ ,,t 4 t_YY": •t`�'•, J 'J r, elt , 1.'�,r,r✓,ij. I h(♦ N t5'a r t ,' 'Zv f i' ,' ,.�.•�'" / I , !. a ,,i ,Y Y• �. f" V .L�j.}.�r{+f+ ,• w, x.11, ?sl V4!71.•,,f,y. V it !:' Y 1 N !' i, { ,Y ( u I • ' 1 a :e 1 1 1 . 1 �•1�;.,,"i,•'.0' /� , �•t i ' � r� Fr , Iw t Y ��i r , i. , ' 4 ,,. , it IS ,� �, 1 1' r ,t�, i", ` - I r _•��,. ,, l,r i,�•j,,,iA i,.,�l! 'yC �"' i i 1 ,* ,,.�Y•,� r,i r�' JiL.V � � r ci .� • � , �, j , 1 I t M)^ '�•I , i t�1,1ti,'�iylr'i„ 1'i} Y4, I ',, w " , � i , -r , Y , I � I ii I � I I• '"? L, , I , . N I • • ..r, • 1^ L) ER : \� J� 0. ./!._ I I r a< 4.r.. It STATE i I ' ', I CTY OF LOS ANGELES I • I 'v I I I , I. . I I • I I I , I On this I h day of ��'Ce�,�+� , iI9��, before are, Ralph g. Etheart, the un ers1gned Wotary u r c, persona)lY appeared C T WA I Re banal Manager, ' 9 , and STEPHEN M. NAZ�OFF, Assistant Secretary, personally known i . . to me to be the persons whose names are subscribed to th, :i 'r." � the Within instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their authorized capacities, and that by their signatures on the instrument the entity upon 1' behalf of which the persons acted, executed the instrument, ,>; • M d� . ♦ , WITNESS my hand and official seal. ,, or u� 4a , r i'. %i *.„0::. 1.,‘ ' Wro�r � ELL- W I 'u• l..,i• Ni; �, (. n Q.::y.�.. .1.—.,.:-,.,..+,......,..._ 4 4'' 1 I r• ry1" 4• .� , I" 11 t 1 iM ., ',•. I 1 Iy I II ri`• r ' I � « r I I ■ . nn . • I I N I I w I dry. I I'I � r ' ;7,11.M:: I , I r 41 ' , '''-c a 1 , ,.., ."11. 1 .„. 1 , 0.,. , p. , , . .1 I, J (S= 1 Z , , • , . I � I heuM ,. 4.. • 0,.., 1 1 . . 1 1 , f ,,..04,..„.1 T .. i.!ij } r • . ,f1�'f 1 i , ' I j, a it le' 4 P{�t11+xJAV-�'I ri 1 .l III A I / I I I �,1♦ I •. I I I' I I I I ' l S ' I r f ,, r It' r, � �' +i +f , " r t ,. - y . .r ,, ♦ 1J }. �'+4. .l i ? � I ,� 1} ,_/":.•. t,:i f tie,':,�a• e «�� 1'- rr' z� y.p.9' �sr� , `f r e' I'• ,',1-,,,,,r ,( S"h v' N r.49 9 '� .�, I� ♦,�f'I ,, �' /.,,,i;, t/,o♦, J ,- \,'I r'4. 'f •'K 1 � a r + 1 1' j � r , Y r� ,u . -,0-e, .» •\ .•rl rr.11 ,,,/a rw.�'+ �1\+.-1y1�7,.{�l ��a f.l� Z'r ijl'•�'•♦':If. �JI I'`r/� ;✓y♦1:�I'('� i'IMr".N f•S,,,IIMS.�' i;� 1 r',�,�•'�,+ �r � .� r r�y� � �` I � ^ .-.14.4,s'r . , . • ,.."4. {jw,f t ti 4ii ., �irr Iq f f . bif }Ilyd 1. 4Z f„( i wv r t+r. „„,,;,,i%.. . +il`• +.� ,•� iZ' ,�;y� �{- .Atli t.�y,�nyt f1 1 �•,�,r S�•�,��J�o. 4 S, rlh 1 w � ,l,,. I ! �' ' �M G 1 1� l� 'ly��;!. y,, . Ij�, , ,�, r fir ••\ R r ,. 'M 1:''iC..l,4 '..0 r r f!'i,,,,t1;1'''' ,,1t'y r�+ 11 1 1,1 'rd'rat �.Y•,�y.oN 4 µ('`;k,�i h•IS Z ,':` Ik r'�: Iii 9 � t�d\'� 1iyW�' '. r .�•,{:;'i °ta 1 1 ti ?�� j, �”JtQ y.SA J�bt.�(.f v�1 fly{1�a. ,�+« �,1 u• �1.+�k {,t + . .v. j�� ti. {�:� �f l v Ur1''. � .l r ��, I .1, 1 1 r I 1 N 14 {U M YI i 1., 1,1 ♦'1't� h'` e�d �� w .,"— , 4 � �1., .' •, Ll. „ ry 1 L� ,1' /4141.1. : r. r�S Kr il, �..F�' �; . ' .. 1� rk; �Y �trS w, it 1 1 �"[r''' t I 1{' Y^"A,.. ;7 3'r err', + V' 1 7 ,+1"1� �Y � ,ri ,tv�.r l,yj�"1•+ ��Wr�1M1 Y; ,r �1��F�,'� �+�1`.� 1 ;:,1 yrl '+,1� TF,.` 'h�t�•'d��y� h ✓/r�;1� �.'N}.i:+'T� �".4,• � 1`S/ f'Yr,� ' �'f.v r,i �},�r9�1 .a"i'�i i'A •�'•�14v''y� �i�'1' Il`� �'1' �I i4+Y; 1.''Ar+�tiPl,r 1 �l: r��ly�r r .rf�j''$'* �n��U '� y+l',+.,irk +/•'1t ,�.� � ,: �•l,H ^ ;'Y'''" .' '�'�,\ 'A+•.'t1 .rare. r.IBS ,., '" ,, / +, x ,� a i r `? p r ^�., t t r'"It. �/, +...`c}�'lyia Rl 1� 4 S•�r3 i � !;3 1,1't...; of��i r � �� l'��+f i ✓ �:♦sP \ .�A� � { � � .1 �+1�'�r�1"t 'Ar � ,.y} „�;' ..,�" �a. j1• /. . �:4rrS�S.r!.. �,..( Y+.,A� �spry� '�'�•� •��,{"��1Wr rj�i:"�\!,1?.j}�'^y}4y LL r L",tf.C,.�.a�' Si�'w�;r,,,J r�P� q,�' :,, '"�?��{a��t'��('�r t♦t�'.:'�c +��.�� '�.' �"•r,`•6.•'..1 ^ 17 ISiA ;4 f 4 '�14'../i Ilp..:Vlit Y.i^t.', Ate.!„�'1t4T ":lijjkft'1C.1 W �'d♦(tl„r,11,f:,4,F.♦ "7::A∎.1/ i'.:!l A N �d(C1q. r4ftt,./,J+..'kY s «„•t ,, 0 '' a i Il'.r'• k.+;+ W.. �M 1,1� •"i' . y6, ;,},�, :d,t,l,1.1:1 4 1 d�',li l f 11;{!p, ra, u „' fib;`.;.,.l.i1j y rt.1 ,(”�',,,iti...4'rr+/ k +' ,.., p 1,�'r :,,•P iii,\ >r J��}}..�ate�F :�• i •� -e..71 M � :'� ,}��} ti d� (�{�,11 J•1'i ,� � �, �,jy�:`u+/lr�'':fL I .T•4,.Y•1 � . J /r 1t /1 • ,• .rW 1Y i` � 11•., ��'jj" ,��y ��,� '{ h�� . j,•,� �"',' -1' 4 1.I' ,A 1. 1 l J t 'I l ' ' i 1 n ' ��./�.l•1 t, ,1..N+lIfY Y CI 1">i N/ r;ii+l�..\'�f1�..yiGi+'I'II... i.SOI i''C'1 1'r'rt,.r f i" t„ ,f111t.!A" k r1�. 1 y'e;'M Of,1",4.1.•! j rh;5:;,' jNl'.i�irb'j'•p • I 1 I r w n ' + ,J 41 n v ' s , , 1 1 i • .i . .■ • N , • P el ' '•k. ." ' ; '',...,:? , ' '• ' , ' :, ' ,„ ' ( ::: ' ' : H : , .:" , , 1, ' :.,. : ., 1 T 4 ' itsme l i y 11f t`ir ; iii : � EXHIBIT •n., D' • R. (• • r Vi'' 11tl� i i • J 1 . �r .Rr• • '' , � The following described real property'situated in the East one-half�oi` Section . : . 1 ' P P ,the County of Township 1 South 'Ra> e 1 West, ai11a�i►►ette Meridian, n #� ; i, A.P "' Washington, and State of Oregon, 'and more particularly described: as follows,. to„ ,,, ,",; wit; � � � '` l n ' „ " .y f L 1 • b „. Beginning at an iron' rod marking the 'Northeast Cotner of the George Richardson n! ,;,. i�' � DOnatieh Land Clain No 55, and running thence North 80 00' West 444.10 feet •, � K�;— � • � �� elonc��t��e 6iO�� y >r�i d�,ry line of',said Claim to an i r`on��rod,. thence South 0 1.2 '4est 452.00 feet to an iron rood; thence North 80' 10' West 2x,60 feet _, r ;; to an iron pipe; thence South :0'12' West 265.24 feet to a potht, the said ., . . ' A ' point marking the true point of be4leol$tig Of this deScriptioh; thence �,. continuing South 0' IV West 100'.00 feet to an Iron pipe set i n the � �' ! Northwesterly l i he of the S.W. Pacific Highway No 99; ,thence along said 11 ne T North 6 477 20 cast 17000 feet to a point; thence 1eaying said line and i ' running g Worth' 36” 12° 40' West 98.29 ,feet to a point; thence North 8g' 48' � ,. , . . '' West 7L47 feet to the true point of beginning of this description ! 1 • 4 TOE TNneaeteni for ingress and fo11 � r:• ' Tho following 'described real property Situate Y $ in the Edst one-half of Section . gr; �l"oWnsh i p 1� South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, in the county, of ' V, `Er , Washington and, State of Oregon, and more particularly descr^ btd as fo110s!.:LL to r . I .:, , , :, 1 , .. 7, . .,� Beginning at a point'ih the'NOrithw�esterly line of Sww. Pacific Highway at the 4 t Ceste'i ,,1. recorded" 20) , page 660 R� of Washington by unty I . Y oS y carne: of-that thai; tract conveyed to Ou7 f�Oil Corporation � I�� D�� d March 1 g1 i n Book 64 p � ` vrde g ecc�rc�S a 9 n irou`ni+y � ' , v, Oregon, thcnre North'36 12' 40' Nest 25 feet;_.thence southeasterly ;r• ~' easterly to a point _ 20'`t "ast 2 ► feet f'r�ml,t.he of point Of he ginning,nni tie thence S:.,4 7'2 5 " st r � is N�. 3 p 9 ,� 0h 4 2O Nest 25 ., + .i feet to the point,�of begif►n ng. ,, : _ ,• . I ,� .I pry � � ,�XCf�PAxN0 '�'fi�iR�'1T`At�M t�i;�. e�x, pa,troAdu�►>i 0.4h�trl�l �;o�,• �ix�atrA�.' �xghtr .�ri� c�thpt' 1H �� :� �. ,�� 1• �� ,..,•,,�� Q�� ,�i�tl�tiiddx�s�rvec� �i��3nedbi��,��de�4pt�ih�,000�g7��a�no�loa��5�'3zo��'i�'��e� �tf.ad.0 �,�� •� r '�� Y e Ap r , Page i' ,O, ,:. , •-!• ,,, , '1 ::, I ' , H : ' ' 1 , ' 1, : • II r i , , , : ,, : ,' .' Ii , 1 1 i , r ■ • r ,� A ,,..j+ ` .,... ,.,, . .:.l.tiA•t11l.1i 11.r: ,-w.�«LrL•.yi+•wrrzl"`�'•r,� rl�� i,,,,�1,`' h-j+,.,},. rl•� "�'�'..'�,'^Y�' , + i1� irli+o�',. r': , Id�YY � r: 14I,' • �' �� . S ti.sto.1^ h-Eau i,:t ur rryi44..•ry 1, a 1 r r �iI r,i t + 4ii ./ �, a(r�'4 r i 'S, l-,;-ttr4r I ,..), 4.7 1 r fir. ,.,1g t tiky;i 1 .7�- A N.I/i�. ,.�+r ;1 t,r,r..4 �r 1 r 71 r•, r 1 r y r DIY ! r+i4 , r1/.r .+'r r t,:i1,1 I''i' i r(a �i Y n..« liu� �}�, 1 yl 1 1'r/Y.� 1, ri i� t,/.1-s'r11 N. +1 �, y. . i,t .�'�1 i oi1�v.. �,r,•3'' �'7�i+�,',Iy1��. ♦",j ► � ,}+111 ( � �y y y t l r 1' � 1 '�IIJ,I t w�y1y�I.r.,'Y r y.�,1f ��11,��, y.�/ a'SJJ , f�'+i1 , '�"r*r . Y r1�r'I` 1 !tt' •e i� r `1., 1•!h,.l.l �rtlM .,1141 i 4'0,4)' '4 1 i i 430': 1 '' ,1 rat 4r t?° ' ' 1 4 1'.t.'� 't1"' ,� /./ " pr'�'l, 'Y wy ', ■ X. M .d' f 'r ;,'.i.'' ... . 4 .+ (' �, n: "y''• a1 �i•i A T�•h d•• ' i .�. y . .S�"�\Il �.''i•,io�r.l yn �'',.�r. r �. '� i" 1.1 Y :i' . y 1 7 1,� Y 1.�j i'. 7 � ' . '•;W'WA,fffh7tr'i'yil+,ti'2.1.4. ++� yi 1 r yi {1 ..Y J .1 "'Mt 1»=r'lr i# 11 '1 .1} ''.�'{, 1 a.�+ 4� �, •r L. ' ti . s, ' I. 1 1 • i • ......oy,•,.-.,'.,o- ..r.s;.«,•,.,. .M„,........».•....._..,,..,..�•. — 1 - ,,,,.,, 9 1.11 F' x1 E3 t, ' ' T l�i i• •r • ,,` .' l ' r' • .2 i P Y . • , M \ ..4- o'^ S � S j�. -o.. 1.,"r;",.1, ..1. n � ,:v+ ".4 1r.1 ^` ,1' �"-r:" d,�ti^':'Pi' '1.= • i •• • I . l'‘.a.... 1/4 • E 1/4 SECTION NORTH WASHINGTON COUN" LINE �' RICNARSON DLC 5f1 ,•.r 1 1 • • 1 IA1. IN I II aww r •, 1 .27.4c. 40, ®Q 358.4 2 1,1 kilo Irm" ..r.'9 A C. m e 9°oQ 4r. • iW, '153. • s- I,�G�p 4 169.2 1 ' ..2640. ,000 ti ti �' °� - ^ p. �I� ■ • «n : , r I I n i N 14604 I a 4 9 Y. ® 9,2 �� to I9 d c, I d I v ��', , n•5044c.1' �, 10.0.9A c. p' 1 � +•, t I +. • I 1 • I 1 � I I , i [ I y� 1 \ 'I 7�'. 1 . I . s► I I, � p„ AC I,L. � 200, '16. a I A 1 I s I 1 • 2I 00 , I I. N tl • I I 0 U ___,_- . , 1 G413.2 I �� .a2�'.�C. 1 i. a 1 I r••- i I I , ________1N 8 0°00.114/: • 1 S E,C 0 le a 4..‘c; 1a I / * 16 0 a. 11--9,6 .. D.J.NELSON 332/243 lel J r ®. AC. .� 19 2 I w C .6a I I ° I II I � 1 I O • a i. Ig 2 o I I I S 89'°gift' r 5a l oi 1, ' a' � ki " 1 ti �� 1 am �.-a 8� I , ro I I K MAP � +• I I i . ,,I see r;a;.113579 1 I I I. I I � I I Cf t 500 %40 2C�S e9 oo E t I 4 �s o .5:5'''"6" cy I ° I 2 00 t • 1 �s a I 0 ' 4t s f I , w• 6a '1 tD I I � I I � � yy t i �" I I i I I I I yy a I ,, a , I i I ,� � rte•• ,�°' �, ' I I I I ' I I • I I 1 I 1 I • • a 1 1 + I'' , • Y t A il?. , NN, II, 1 lih t 1 illil , , w t. a 1 dict 1 .---,s.... 49- •• • . ,,,, ,/,,, 1 , 1 4 1 NN, • • . .4," ( Z H itit af r .. 1 Y r +I.1 4,141''Wei WO Y / . I 1, I ■ a 'i Y: 1 i` • . ,.f . • Y'' + I I , NN '41/ ...,h4 , 4t► , 'T h II 1•L r•J■F ` + .♦J I • 1 , + 1 I• +Y 1 i 1'i I Y , p / ', ` tY r• 4 r NN 'Y 1 � Y 1 . , 1 'Y I 1 r I 1 � • . . ` I f/ 44 1 ` / y� • �I 0 I 6t H f. I ' ettp it r. r 1 i , r. i 1'' I , N\\'''''''' • , '• 1 1 4 I 1 1 1 , I 1 I I I I • I 11 'r 7" 1 111 1. L • ......A.«.ir,..+A.»lwli4-' ..,-nw .,r,..., a.r......,i.,.,..-1,..+...,.a.r.,..., ,1,'4_.»„0.......4., ..-r.... .. ..........A.,,..,p...A-..,....—.xp,«.n.,..-..._..,,.«.....N i...w.,...,..,...... ..-.....r....«.,p,r.,.n..w„......,N«r,....+.+ ..p......1,.-,.....,......1.....n.._..I......i.l.pnrLw ,r+_.I... 1_ »w.l _.._.. ....a» • • (4: OREGON �. `r BUSINESS ARCHITECTURE P:C. NARRATIVE Site Development Review CITY OF TIGARD t I 11595 S.W. Pacific Highway April 12, 1993 . • , The property owners propose to demolish existing service station building and construct a ' one level commercial building to be leased to a furniture retailers Parking and Loading (13) standard size parking spaces (including 1 handicap space) are proposed; exceeding minimum requir ed. Limited inventory�is brought to site from a local manufacturing facility via a step van during off peek hours. Most merchandise is delivered directly to customers from, tile manufacturing facility. No staging or special loading areas are required. ' I Crime Pve tion and Safety T o Windows will be located on the south side adjacent to parking and on the short east wall cent landscaping. Doors will be located on y y ti South S, e, adjacent parking, ' adjacent to landsc p' moo � 1 on the Sou id dyacent top ` gz , Parking lot lighting is provided by 250W HPS on 20'47 standard and (5) wall mounted • fixtures on building (see lighting plan). Access and Circulation • •. No additional cur Ucuts/dr ivewa y aprons are proposed. Both existing driveways from pacific Hi g hwa y are to b e maintained in ord er t o p ro vide adequate circulation for automobiles and . � • emergency vehicles, Pedestrian access is provided from right-of-way to retail building via A sidewalk and striped crossing sing at parking dot, rd la ;p l Grading is attached. Minor changes'to existing grading are proposed. A cone; tua n Plan i ' .,b s are site to minimize runoff right-of-way. ► . Catch being added to site i unoff'Ito z`iglat-df�� fir. Finish floor ' I ..arch h�as�n e begin add elevation is to be approximately 18 lower than existing service station floor level, to accommodate . , ninodate li andi`cap access requirements. 6218W Alder,Suite 530°Portland Oregon 97205 0503/228-9747 FAX/241-0702 I I 1 , n V t • r • • ..., +....,t«.G W , • stria• Applicant understands that (1) two sided, free standing sign is allowed ed on site (70 s q.ft. P , face) and building wall signs are allowed for up to 15% of wall area. Tenant will apply for separate sign permits before erecting any signs. • • • Owner/Applicant Agent • I I Oregon Business Architecture P.C. Attn: Daniel Young 621 SW Alder, Suite 530 Portland/ 72 OR 97205 • • I I 1 1 1 I I 1 r • • • • II ' 1 I . I I � , I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I 1 1 I I. 1 . I I I 1.' I I 1 i S ! 1 II II � I _.in:A:• M .I.A.r,rwr,...,,;.C,,.w.l,.,+..a.�..y,w„,.a,,..+�.. ,'.lG.. .r...».............i.'...�L�.".IwL..,�.,,,.�..,��1..,,,.Ao-.,.+r-..,.4.4. 144.isr.w,:,..44.A.,.:44..»...,4.sn,444 .w.++.e..iw.:.:A...u...i,,....L.+,.,,:..1.44;,,«.,..,.a.irV•.-:�w�.,.a44 4A,.d,,:..;w.l..n..m.we.»-«.,..,n.-..,.uw A*.4. A4,41.4• rnNvaw :. 47 • (; OREGON BUSINESS • ARCHITECTURE RC. ' I I I 1• 1p Traffic Generatio st te: • RE: Proposed 5000 s.f. Retail Building at 11595 SW Pacific Highway. ;II Furniture Store (Tenant) is currently located in adjacent shopping center, The store manager provided the following information: ,Current Store - urs I I I Monday'& Friday: 1OAM to 8 Tuesday, Wednesday & Thursday: 10AM to 6PM Saturday: yl 10AM to 5P1 Sunday: 12PM to 5PM Custol r `_Traffic Number customers on weekdays:aY s. to 14 cu sto ers per day. I . •, I I I' I V Number of customers on weekends. per day. 12 1 5 customers I I I I , I . I I , I , I n I I I I I I ? I I I I I I , II ' I I I I ti 821 SW Alder,Suite 530•Portland, Oregon 07205'503/228-9747 PAX/241-O70 I I rr ; �t x, • M M I TIGARD CITY OF I CONFERENCE . PRE-APPLICATION 4NFERDN I I I , "j Cis ` POTENTIAL APPLICANT: C9 y C AGENT: I, I I Phone: �.2 - 17 Phone: ti I I w. I P P RTY' LOCATION.� N ADDRESS: Sc,i `a`C ' TAX MAP & TAX LOT: '2S 31 1 A ati NECESSARY AP PxI CA TI d N S � • , PROPOSAL '!L)ESC trPTION: 5 C1 4 ` l _ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: e''..,,14J ZONING DESIGNATION: I , NEIGHBORHOOD PLMNING ORGANIZATION # CHAIRPERSON. I I PHONE. ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot 'tsize:, .w-�---�� ag ft. Minimui lot. width: 576 ft. Setbacks: front ,,.-� ft. side rear . 'r ft garage ft•' corner ft. from both atreeta. ' Maximum site coverage: � % Minimum Landscaped or naturaa.)regetatian area: L l Maximum building height: 41,5 , f ., ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS l I Minimum lot frontage: 25 feet un ea a lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created� as part of�.'�a partition must' have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15 foot wide access c�aaement,. Maximum lot depth to width ratio of 2.5 to 1. I I I I SPECIAL SETBACKS ;.. Streets: ,,` ,C.. ft`. from centerline of ()16-<- 1' , . L1-2 Established a.z`eaa,r � �,.-��'. ft. :Erom , ,� zoned: ft. alon ,the sites s -� boundary' ,r Flag lot: 10 foot side yard �setbaek I Zero lot line lots: .. foot''Separation between hui1dizls a Multi-family residential building Separation: See C ode Section) 16.96.00. Y AcdeSsory Structure0 up to 528 Square feet 5 ft. 'minimum aetba ik from Side and ,rear lot lines a Accessory ,�i:ructu�:e u'' to I1000 s ft. on a�ce1.� of at least 2.5 a erne in I I � � � size � I Re applicable � ZOn se I e I I • tba.oks �'far pra.hfiargr I /!y yIJ {r y�jyi zoning �di.atriot' I 4 i sti.tic Nu:Li 1Zi E X11 I. I Page III I I 1 I I I I IL I I I , i1 I I , ' I } I I li ..,, .n.wr,'':,...,.,. .i, r......... .. .. .... r,iii r . i.,..,.,r..,, .......,...,..I..-. ., ...i , • ✓ - • • I • I • m , YI • I FLAG LOT BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS E s Maximum height of 1 1-1/2 stories or 25 feet, whichever is lees in most zones, 2.4/2 stories or 35 feet in 12--7, R-12, R-25 or. R-40 zones if standards of Code Section 18.98.030(B) are met. RESIDENTIAL, DENSITY CALCULATION , ; I Community Development Code chapter 18.92 specifies that the net I residential u its ' allowed on a particular site may be, calculated by , unit in ��area by licable zoning districtf I dividing the n area of ,the developable _ � square feet requ ed�per� dwelling the applicable g .' • I Net development ea is calculated by subtracting the following land area(s)I from the g' •ss site area: 1. All sen= "1ive lands areas land wi'hin the 100 'year floodplain slopes e eedin g 25% drainagewa s 2. Land dedicatee for park purposes , 3. Public right-o . way' dedication I 4. All land provide• for private stereets (inoludes accesswaye I • through parking a -as) e The City of Tigard allows a resii ntial density transfer of up to 25% of the units that could otherwise h e been developed on sensitive lands 1 1 e portion of the site in t � the evelo abl_ ort • I I areas listed in (1) above o th P P accordance with Code Section 18.92.03 r • It is the responsibility of the aP P lidant for a residential. development 1 1 � Y application to provide a detailed calculation for both the permitted 1 residentie'. density and the density transfer„ RESIDENTIAL DENSITY TRANSITION Regardless of the allowed hot ing density in a zoning district, any property within 100 feet of a d i'gnated established area shall not be ter , ; r ! developed at a density greater ban 125 percent of the maximum i COmprehensive Plan designation (not z ing) of the adjacent parcel. _ I RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SOLAR ACCESS REQUIREMENTS All subdivisions and minor partitions are I subject to solar access 1, requirements whi state that 80% of all lots created must be oriented for ,� I of l shoe ` " The a striking the south walls and roofs of the ho high olar ssibili y characteristics a solar-�-oriented lot: are i . '' � � levels of winterti a run pt f� t use, house orientation aximizing south window area and a south- loping roof area. To achieve t is, one May utilize the followings Ji • 90 north-8outh lot Basic re � it e e� -. hots� with at lea.�lt a ,D a. ass m ension and a frorn.t lot line orientation. within 30 d es'' of dim sore an east west axis; • b. Pro tec ted Sola r Builds g Line: The solar building li ne must a) be n 30 deg, es �of east west, cb) be a minimum of et 1, ro t e middle of the 1 to the south be nim 45Ife orien within f 70 feet f m the m3�ddl ect zc► from the 'no thexnetrast �bua:ldabl�e boundary of the su�►a t 00 Performance Options. The et option requires the house to be Ih oriented within 30 degree of n east-we st axis and have at least 80% of the grothnd floor p soft wall „protected froth shade. The second option requires) that at lea t 3b% of from sha0 square l v feet of the roof area face south an protected ` I I I I I Page • I 1 • { 1' I I I I I i I I I i i ., ' i III I I I i i t•` I I 1 1 I I t I I 1 • • .. ....+.... ...•• :,•.....sn.... �... ...wn..nu,u��,.r..�.R..,.•�•.<Y..t.r•..v .. .. „'• ....,,.....rv+ , ...,,» r.... ,.. • vl. I. , • l „ Z '� I 1 1 I 1 , Total or'partial eke ption of a site from the polar laccess requirement can ,' �,' b a, approved for the flowing reasons,: ' , ' . Ea st wes t o r n th slo es steeper e r than 20%. , - Off-site shade, so rces (atruc tine s�, vegetation,' to p o g r a p Y) 1 . 4 � On�site shade sour 'yes (vegetation) . T 1 I ' of des i n �re irementl k1 `� solar ]. Adj�.istments��;allowx.�ng �a��reduct onl'of the ��A 1 g � , iean be made 'for the following easons: ,' �' y r an, lincreased cost of at least' five l'percent� due I. �d 1., I I ,, Reduc.ed�den's �,ty�a I to either: ' , � 1 1 , ' ** 1 east', west or north sl a greater than 1.0.%, G , signs fic;ant natural fea ture, � � � � * ex�sting roa� or lotting:Pattern„tern, ' � 1 * public c e s m en t Io r right t� Jf ��.W� Y I I 1 t Reducion in imprtant de telopipc:nt ene . I P,e-existing,'shade (vegetation) ' I 1 '**I Mans and text' are resulted' w hich' are sufficient tc �ho w that the . - devlo ent 'com lies ith 'the solar design' standards, °or tht 1 specific 1 1 ,' : . ' lots should be exempt d ,or adjusted out.' , The following im lwea shall) be included' in the analysi a I It �. e orientat�.on ofe ach f 0 1 �� n e a�on and front ]. t he nor th south lot im ns r a. T r , i 'proposed lots I, b.' Protected olar buil.ing lines' and relevant, building' site I :. restrictions if appl.a,ca 1 e; , . • c,. For the 'purpose, of identif 'ng trees related to exemption requests, a map showing existing trees .t least 30 feet`,'tall'and over 6 inches' diameter at a point 4 feet hove grade, )including their height, ' ' diameter, and spec,ies,,, and,stating that they are to to be retai fed;, and ' ��': 1 d. Oopies ,�of all''private restrictio•s r-elati'ng to',sollar access-.1 I 1 1 �y PARKING 1 �'i-b�D ACS ', 1 fu .�. / S5 ''�� '� 1 Requited automobile parking.: _ per 1 , (, w.. e' ed arkin space er unit required " I � I" one coved r I p � g p '�►� q � 1 ' ��C��s�l��r�� 1 "; -multi family ,units faith more°than' 2 bedrooms 1 ' require two parking spaces per unit. , II of re ired s aces may be designated cam actonly spaces � ' 2 5� qu p � '� g p 1 Standard parking space 1dimensions: „g ft. X 15 ft. Compact parking sp ace dinena ions. 8e5 ,ft X 115 ft. Handicapped' parking: All parking areas proViding shall provide �' a .propri'ately located and designated hanGicappe'd parking Epacs~.;0: The ' 1 p �, � . �,,,,.,. minimum, number of handicapped g anseSwto b la .sa vided'' and,:parking .� apace s dated b he imer c ro*� ,i.t ee �r�, see � �r�zin' s- , y't p. size arcs man ( 41. - handout). I 4 handicapped parking space symbol shall lbe painted on 1 the ark in sp a' 1 ,�. ,�; �. p rg p' rye %i.trtaCe anc� ari appropriate ;sign.: s�lYal.�.. be provided.,,' �' ,' < y .. a .d for, multi-family' re, y al, de nts ,' 4 ' ac}CS area' irate y �_,,,(� Btc cle �' I ident evelopm I �� Bicycle racks shall be located in rea protect',ed from autotobile b aft is. ' and in convenient locations. , 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I age , ', , : ' , , , ,: : '1: ,: ' ',i, 'H t , ' ,'. 1! !:,1 ' . 1 I i 1 � 1 II a i 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 � 1 I 1 .40 ' . . . ' \ ' 1 . . , I ' Y ,.....1.-...14_4 1.,.+.,.«.,l.....I.r_—.-u.- . ._w.,..-.- _,-.,._._......- .•_-i ....Y h.�,..w..«1.... .•,l, .+ .,_1 .A.! .,.r -.a/�_..,.. .I. ., -,, i.» .r.t.— ».J.!_.«.:.__ .._ ........+...._..r. - ..r.l,_. All parking areas and driveways must be paved. Minimum number of accesses: Off' Li Minimum access width: ° ,>Q Maximum access width: Y -� Pedestrian access must be provided between building entrances and parking areas, outdoor common areas, and public sidewalks and streets. T' , A minimum of one tree, per seven parking `spaces must be planted in and d' around all parking areas in order to provide a canopy effect. Landscaped screening of parking areas from views from public rights-of--way must be provided. For detailed information on design, requirements for parking areas and accesses, see Communty'Development Code Chapters 18.106 and 18.108. CLEAR VISION AREA, , The City requires that clear viaioa areas be maintained ned between three and 44 . ' eight feet ' above grade at road/driveway,' road/railroad, and road/road intersections.' The size of the required clear ''vision area depends upon the abutting street's ,functional 'classification. • I , i I /\ I , • BUFFERING AND SCREENING ' it 1 . In order to inorease 'privaey and, to reduce or eliminate adverse noise or I vi:aual impaots between adjacent developments, especially between different I land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site ter Required bu� are described by the Cade`in terms of ! •1 perimeters.. buffer areas descr.�b terms width, Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of l deciduous s and • s ^ shrubs y .. are virtical and I evergreen tree and. shrub and must achieve a balance between vir horozontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or I fences required y in some casea and I are often o Cuai�ed�bb�v`eeetata.on,not fences''reqUired. utilitiRequired e�ia�ad ; buffer. areas may only be G p by g , , , Walkways'. ' I I I R I I . l Additional info rmation formati: on on re qu ired buffer I area materials and sizes ma y be I I,. • found in Code Chapter 18.100. � , • I Required buffer widths applicable to your proposal area. ,, I I .I, . 1 �t. along nort h boundary ft. log eaat boundary t. along south boundar y ft. along west b oundary 1, I I ' I I I In addit on, s g ht cbsclatinq Screening ia required along ' I Page '4 I I I , I , I I , I I I 'I I I I , I a I I � I I I I I I II I I I I I I I ,. •• I I . ',.era...,1.,.:.,,.:. :....A.......'.,,A ..1 L..,... .,::. ,.-....I,.'',. A,.'. r ray •.., .... ,. .,r„-x+.,a,...all. r ,a..... .,��..._..r r. ........a.lwl.. al.. ...x•,.....L...4,J,.W..,. •.l•_,.4. ...r,. ... ..i4..+4..,.. .r,. ....+vn,.,r.„ I I II n v I 1 I i LANDSCAPING I ,, Street trees are required for all developments fronting on a public c 0 r private street; and' for driveways more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way on on private property within six feet of the .right-of-way boundary. Streee trees must have a minimum caliper of two inched at four feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on mature tree size. Further information on regulations affecting street trees and a list of recommended street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. • 1 I SI NS Permits must be obtained before erecting any sign in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits” handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed a art o;,.. a development epplication. 7th r.f.�. S ! 4 > ' .. SENSITIVE LANDS Code Chapter 18.84 provides regulations fo r lands potentially 1 y unsuitable a ewa, e, wet u within the 100-year f lood la excess o f 2 5 percent,natural n for development due to' areas with • drain g y l�nd' areas, on slopes ' nt or unstable ground. 8 .ff will attempt to preliminarily identify sensitive lands areas at th- pre-application ' conference based on available information. However, he restetonsbIility to ptecieelideritify sensitive lands areas and then boundraries is the responsibility of . the applicants Areas meetin' the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on glans s mi.tted with a developmentappiication. I � Chapter 18.84 p rovides•- re u . t xo ns for , protection, or mod £ tation' f sensit i e ands a reas. Residential development is prohibited within f loodplains. In vmost cases�, dedication of 100-year V f l ,P oodl lain}areas to the City for park ndl open space areas is required as a condition of approval of 'a','development application. !' I , I , ADDITIONAL CONCERNS 0 A COMMENTS e r T: t o. l 1 I .. I I , I ' � I I I I . r I I I I 1 I I I f I I. I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I i • I I I I i I I I • 1 „ • PROCEDURE Administrative staff review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making arec�,mmendat�.on on the proposal to the Cit y Council. Another public hearing is held by the City Council. All applications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff Member at the Community Development Department counter. at City Hall. Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications submitted after 4:30 P.M.. on ' Thursday will be batched for processing with the following week's applications for processing. No applicat ions will be accepted after 4:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other days Maps submitted with an application shall be folded XN ADVANCE to 8.5 by l.1. inches.' One 3.5 inch by 11 inch map of a .proposed pra• ect should be • submitted for attachment to the staff re ort or administrative decision , The Planning Division and Engineering Division will do a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an applidation is complete within 10 days of submittal. Staff will notify an applicant if additional information or copies of the, submitted materialo are needed. The administrative decision/public heating typically will occur, approxirt`iately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as complete by the Planning Division. '; Applications involving di.ffidult issues or requiring review by other 3urirdictions may take additional time to review. Written decieione are issued • yn 10 days a y s of the hearing. A 10 day appeal period � �ow��11 decisions. An a ppeal on is matter would be heard by the �►� 14,t ,» 1� • A basic fl o w di a gram iti lustnating the review process is available from the r Planning Division. The p%e-application conference and the notes of the conference are intended to info. rm the pmspp ectivo applicant of the primary Community Development lode '• � ' requirements applicable to development pme t of a particular ' site and to prospective and a pP licant to diecuss the s p port�ni t iea and don t ra�nts affeetirg development of the site. The conference an notes c annot cover all Code requirements and aspects of goo bite plan ning that should app ly to the development of your site plan. Failure to ._ ,. . constitute a j vet of� the a l�.da�, � � information required by the�Code shall not co � of w staff provide�P�a.nformat �:. �I the p �licant d either obtain requirements. It '�.,s , recommended that a prospective a nd read the redo t t p a community Development Code or at k any questions of city staff relative tt done req-uiretnents prior to Eiubmittitrc an appiicationy Another p r e ea p�l iCdtion conference as required d if a n application to b e subMitted moue than six months after this re�a licaticn eorference unless the sedond don f?rerCe id deemed usnedessary by the Planning f'. D iv'is ion. . t� 9 2' PRLPA ., �1D }j� �, afar 7 PLAH�T:C DIVISION PHONE: 639e4171 page 6 �P erte i r I • I 1 • , , , .h I I I 1 1t I I I f I 1 • I I • 1 I r I r • I • 1 I I I 1 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 I ■ n. I f II • 1 I I I 1 I I 1 • 1 1 • 1 1 1 • I r II II I I I 1 1 I 1 1 I. • I •' N I I I I I I I I I I r I r ,, , .. , .1 , . ., . . . ,. , . ,, ,., , .. ,1,, I i i 1. I • . , 1 1 r . .. . ,1 .. ,,, I• . . . . . , . . ,.. ,. , 1 1 I „ . 1, ,, ,,.,, . , , , , , . ,. ,. , , , , . , . 1 , . I I I, , a 4 , i' ,• 1 b I I V i I I I 11 PUBLIC FACILITIES . The purpose of the pre-a.pplication conference is to: (3.) identify applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions; (ii) to provide City staff an opportunity to comment on specific concerns• and (iii) to review the application review process with the applicant including identifying who will be the final decision maker for the a pp lication. The extent oI f necessary public improvements vements a n dedications to be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and . approved by the appropriate authority. There will ''' be ` no final recommendation to ,the decision maker. by City staff until all commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and • comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public, improvement related requirements that may be required l as a condition, of development approval for your project. ��, Rie t-of-wave'dec ica.tion: The City of Tigard requires 'I that land area be , dedicated to the public to increase abuttin g public ublic to the �3(.1 ultimate functional'street��classification rights-of Way width specified by t 0 the Community Development Code or to create new streets. CON' Vil') ) . ' e ,Approval of a development application' for this site will require C' e dedication� d n of right-of-way fo r. 1. to feet from centerline. I • to feet from r m Ce21Ge 'l1ne• � 1 _„ Street improvements:. l• street improvements will be necessary along 2. street improvements will be necessary` along 3. Street improvements will a zclude feet of pavement I from centerline, curb' and gutters, storm sewers; underground placet'sient of utility wires (in moot cases. .Alternatively, a fee JO collected), a five- foot ' a sidewalk on arterials collectors), necessary Street signs, streetlights, and a two y ear treet1ig hting fee. In Some m cases' w.. h e e street improvements or oth er necessary public iblic ! improvements are n ot currently practical, the street improvements may be I r deferred. In these ceases, as a (condition of deve1opnient approval, (the property owner(s) must eXedute a non-remonstrance agreement which waive s the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district formed to improve: ` I 1 , See rianurav /bi1tewa rs; �' II � I I 4 I aan1 tr y _Sewer s The Clos est eanitaxy �ew e � �e_.t is �r eii s at �� 1 inch line lOcated at " `4,,� 9 t The prcpoeeII d development must be corncc�e t� s o erLt ary sewer` It �s the deaeloper r S � responsibility to extend� sewer e al ong NeIl proposed development �� te�s i ' � � I ; a I I I I I I ' I I I , a I I I I � I I I I I ! ' I 4I I , II I I l I I I I I„ , Hj • w .+1..,...r .w' ':..Ir''1. r.;.,.....-Ji.,... ,. .'.. ,.ur. ,.':' ., .....aa...,.s..., ..... ._ .a ,.,....4. .n •.av N,a.M, t ... ,..•.... ...„,.t..r.a.rr.. ......ral._ _r._,..+.w.a»,.4..— ry 4.r..a.,...-, ...., I.. r y r I � er Super , The P4, ' lam, c `•,(- Water Dietri.ct (Phone: ) provides public water Service in the area of this site. The District should be contacted foe information regarding water supply for your proposed development, Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene BirchLll, 645-8533) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation, systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Other Agency Permits ��._ OP' r (r Storm sewer improvements: _____ ____________ ,,44, , ......_,............._________________, ..... • ST0'RMWATER QUALITY FEES The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to ' enforcer Resolution No. 90-43, Surface Water Management Regulations, ' requiting the construction of on-Site water quality facilities or 'I'fees in lieu of their construction. The reeolution regtiiree that a fee and/or iouss surface, for every 2640 square feet or based on construction of a water quality facility be built. The fee e the amount fee shall be $285.00R T e City of Tigard determines if titan ' thereof� the� im ery l � or o ! y a fee • ' or facilitly, shall be *alit.' w • � I +' ,, '',,� , . �� "� . ,.I :M! tr'.,. . ._ TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted la county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF)new development The based on the Impact developmentu e projected impact from the Traffic 4 transportation y em: Developing roe ,quired to pay r p p 'on , 's st i g' p p .�t�es,� will be re a� based on the number of trips they are projected to generate. The TIF is calculated based on type of'°ueey dine of project; and a general use based Lesuance. In limited. c urrnst the Tx' May . . g permit . fee category. F shall be calculated at time of building ' ' � � � limited irc antes► payment of �� y �be allowed to • be deferred until iseuance of occupancy permit. Deferral of payment until occupancy i0 P greater than $5,a ' P ry ermi�dsi.ble only when the TIF is Ireate dt7.O0: OPENING G I 1T. STREET P IN a'PERMIT I No work within a public i. h t-of-way ehall commence until the cant has obtained a street opening permit from the Engineering Dep artriant FINISHED L''I:►OClR ELEVATIONS I I r On a:,.l l P ro jeotS that require a gr a ng plan, the applicant shall submit sit I with the grading plan s typica l floor plai for s ac lot which shall have li I `I eele v. elevations onS of four c or r ner s p f that plan lan along cng w t` a ev a i and At the ' � corner of e ach lot. III I I I . PREPARED BY:: �. t . ENGINEERING DIVl S I A PHONE: 635-4171 , - Q t REA. P��i T P P S I Rage 8 I I .I r : I fi V' /' , f, Staff R?/cp Date CITY OF TIGARD _ �... ,. COMMUNITY DEVELOP r' APPLICATION CHECKLIST I J. a I The items on the checklist below are required for the successful completion of ;,, •'�_ your application submission requirements. This checklist'' identifies what is ' , i required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be brought and submitted with all other materials at the time you submit your , application,t xan See your application for f urther explanation of these items s or , call Planning at 639-4171,E I , ri ITEMS TO BE d INCLUDED: BASIC MATERIALS A� MA tALS� Owner's te x, A) ApOlica tion form (1 copy) ,] , , 1 I � s� nature/wraiten authorization � � � C) Title 'ti transfer instrument � � � � [ ,.:r d. , 1 0) Assessor's map' C E) Plot or site plan , i , c F) p A licant s statement Applicant's Y . 04__14.94_04.,„ ,,,!• t r i .. . r '�. .1 I Q 50 e4t C �i' ' • Y, (H)' Filing fee ...�.... ..) 1 ,yam " 1 SPC`tFIC M,ATERIALS A) Si te Information tion showi ng (No. of copies , f ) .Y ,C . 1) Vicinity Map . 1, 2) Site size & dimensions El"-'.. ...-. ' • . 8) Contour lines (2' ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10%) t • 1 4) Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds 1 C ' 5) Locations of natural hazard a re as including: �I I . a) Floodp1a :h areas E ) , I b) Slopes an'I ex ees s of 25% � I C ] , �, , c) Unstable ground IC ] ", d) A re as with high seasonal water ta ble ' e. Areas with severe soil erosion otential I , f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils C ] 1 • 6) Location of resourco areas as shown on the Comprehensive ' ' Map inventory ineludYing: 7 I a) Wildlife habitats I C I . 7) Other site features: 1 a) stock outcro!ppings $ I] b) Trees with E� + caliper measured 4 feet . • from grout�d level l' ,. 8) Location of existing, structures and their,:uses I I r ' 9) Location and typo of oh and offL site noise sources C 1 10) Location of existing utilities and easements �11) Location of existing dedapaied ^xght—of—wads i C i • D Site DeVe b ent Pla s win •cie 1) The proposed site and surrounding, properties [- 2) Contour line �intervals ' !, i. 3) The location, diton si ons and n mes of alit 1 • ' a) Egisting & 'platted streets & othor public Wads and easeniehts �.oh tho site ;end on, adjoining E I ' . °ro orti4s i' J • I. �'L:LGA" CAN CHECKLIST a e 1 z i r' i , • w , • b) .posed streets or other publics" , s & easernentsl ,r on the site. �� I c) ��Alternative �routes of dead enc��'o�• proposed i � � � streets that require future extension . C '' • 4) The location and dimension of: a) Entrances and exits on the site [ (; h g Parkin and circulation areas C j V s �a r c) Loading adxn .and. services ea IC Y I d) � Pedestrian and bicycle��carculatxon, e) outdoor common areas, C �, j f) Above e g noun d utilities C 5) The location,� dimensions & setback distances of all', I . a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, I utilities and easements which are located oh h the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site 1 Proposed structures, i )r o ve m ehts I utilities and easements on the site 6) Storm drainage facilities an d analysis of downstream conditions � �,Sanitary sower� facilities 7 ..any.#' I• 8); The location�� of areas to be landscaped 1,r- 9) t' t tdoor�'lx lighting The �location� and��type ��of outdoor g� g considering crime prevention techniques C 4 1: 17 ` he location of mailboxes s 11) The location of all 'structures and their orientation L- ' " 1 12) Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement afire mehts �yl • C) Cradin Plan (No. of copies , _) t ,"' -~ The site development plan shall include la grading plan a t I I I the same scale as the site analysis drawings' and shall contain the following information: i , I n ' . �.)' The location and, extent Ito which grading will take place indicating general contour' lines, 'slope ratios 11 and soil stabilization proposals, and time of year� , be d' eY �e to 'b. o it x s proposed d o r1 '" x p p �^'J r 2) A statement from a (registered engineer supported;by data fp.ctUal substantiatihg a) Subsurface exploration grid geotechnicai I engineering eeri n g report C7 I b) The validity of ,sanitary sewer and storm drainage service''proposals 1 • c) That all problems will be mitigated and I how they will be mitigated [ 1 b) Architectural arawings (No, or copies );. [ 1 , The site development plan proposal shall include: t 1) rloor Plans indicatin9 the square.footage of all �I structures proposed for use oh sate., and �[� �� , 2) Typical' elevation drawings of each stiructUre Y' � I E), Landscape Platy, (No, of copies )t' [,,. -"', I I I c e �of� the sam �.�scale��s b� drawn�wn atl thy.� e � The landscape plan half e d � I , . I site analysis Plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall I indicate: I 1 1) Description of the irrigation system where applicable t/1- • 2) Location and height ofi fences, bU fers and screenings) [ j • APPLICATION CHECKLIST — Pagel, �2 I , II I I i I ri I I i I I • I + . • 3) Loca 1 of terraces, decks, shelters,( »ay areas and common open spaces [ ] 4) Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials. The landscape playa shall include a narrative which addresses: 1) Soil conditions, C 3 2) Erosion control measures that will be used. [ ] F) t++ _EgtA'+' Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance wi th Chapter 18,114 of the Code as part of Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to constru ct the sign, C A G) Traffa:i e6peration estimate E I . H) Preliminary parLition or lot line adjustment mad showiht (No. of Copies ): 1) The owner, of the subject parcel E 2) The 'owner's 'authorized agent C � � 3) The map scale, (20,50,100 or 200 feet=1), itch north ar� raw and date � � � � ; � �� ] � ^ 4) Description of parcel ce l location and boundaries C 3 ��' 5) Location, width an d names of s t Meets �a se menus and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel [ ,� w' 6) Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25 feet a feet of all property lines E ] 7) Location and width courses 8? Loea �o � o f �h Y trees with ath 6 or greater cad i e r O t 4 feet above ground level [ ] 9) All slopes greater than 25% 10) Location of existing utilities 'and utility easements [ 11) For major land partition which creates a public s tMeet: a) The proposed right—of—way location location and width C b) A scaled cross-section of the proposed stree t C plus any MeseM`ve, restrictions strip tM ap ! 12) Any ap p lxca l e de ed C3 13) Evidence� :�ui ence that land �partition will not preclude 1 efficient future land division where applicable x) Subdivision PM Olimin21 y �lac �a and d.a ta s h o wan C ha, of C opios 1) Stale al equaling 30 5 ��' 0 �f�0 or� �^ 2 0 feet to the n I,, and limited �o oM one phase per sheet i' 2) The proposed Name of the subdivision r , 3) Vicinity map showing property's relationship to , arterial and collector streets r . 4) Names, addresses and telephone hurnhers of`the owhet** ' ,. I deueloaer, engineet , sdrueyerlr, des a,g M r) as applicab l eC A I 5) bate of application J 6) Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided C � 7) ' Names of �� subdivision subd�v��i sh or naze of recorded , owners of adjoining p rc 1 of unsubdivide d land t � � � � � 'j. . 8) Contour lines related to a City- established bench mark at 2-foot intervals f cr 0-10% grades greater than 10 , t j, J APPLICATION CNEC$LtST Page 8 III h ti w • 9) The 6, pose, location, type and size d All of the j following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): [ 3 a) Public and private right-of-ways and easements [ 3 b) Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines [ 3 • c) Domestic water mains including fire hydrants [ d) Major power telephone transmission lines .• (50,000 volts or greater) [ 3 e) Watercourses [ 3 f) Deed reservations for parks, open space, pathways and other land encumbrances [ • 10) Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated [ 3 11) Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and fire hydrants. L 12) Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a d { the limits of the proposed reasonable distance beyond tr subdivision, [ ' 13) Scaled cross sections of proposed street right-of-way; [ 1 14) The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow ' [ 3 15) Location, width and direction of flow of all water— courses and drainage ways [ 3 16) proposed lot configurations, a pprox mate lot dimensions and lot numbers. Where logs are to be I �` I other residential, it shall be • ent'' i, p [' 3 j 17) The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or 4 greater mea cared at 4 feet above round level, and .� o g cation of proposed tree plantings, if any the location [ including the 10) The existing uses of the property, inc .A location of all structures and the present he � uses of p • I the structures, and a statement of which) structures are to remain after platting [ `! jj i y 19') Supplemental information including: a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) I C sl b) Proof of property ownership [i c) A proposed plan for provision of subdivision I ' i mprovements I I I [ 20) Kistin g natural features including ro ck out- croppings, wetlands and marsh areas, [ . 1 li I 21) If any of the foregoing information cannot 'practicably he shown on the pr`elxrinary plat, it shall be narrative. incorporated in to a and submitted with the application. [ I I 3) Other Information s I I N.W (23620/00200) i b APPLICATION� hCHECKLIST - Page ', I I I I I I I I , I I i I II I I I " M•'r,, • • • 1 • ly 14 SECTION I ■ 1 NORTH LINE d. RI CH A R s al DLC s 5 WASHING N COUN' 0 9' r• . ia7 o • 1700 l r, :.c: Ac. «n '.558. 1 2{ 4 . . I. as 0 { i �1 P , •e 9 Ac. A at) 11e.2, I� I400 A 4 f d Ch o a h. �;,.3 Ac+ I iLL®sAc ' ' 0 1300' gip. " 1 �-1'- v .264e 2C�® I-rs.z {sg.Q an „2 A 1..22 0 c A i i dd rr 1 60 1 t I• Ac: ti N®9°o W t �. .� 9 6 :,Eg - S D E.NCOFLR,S P N' d3z/1 29 cy W 1 « /• •l, 6 d X 8 q ' '{ n 46640, 444 I92;q �.. 0 o' ^ I ;• • I. S ss°oa0 i CV OOAc , $ :5 .a. aMl � d a Ste ti.S.10679 • �N • IGO ' Boa o ", „�,''" tia e•l7 a � 1 ,[.c Il P C • O 900 ; fn 119J ��o'. ri. t� . �,, gdt, '� ' h) ,604'4 ,, to ��. oG' d1`� I' oti '.35 4e, 6 6 iiii 1 rr 0 I gooM d x 1 . Hi co , c io yF ca a �ii � I 1 C'� a i r~• M' rp: • • rt0 r'" J l 1 61C • k� r t .: „ d f 1 • tli' ti II ti 1 .rv,r11`� ' 040q da Y"l : i is „ � Y . r t(trf • • I I ......_ ,.. .� • � �., „ua.... .._.,...+.. f*.il� ...«.L.,�..W.'w.,«.+.+.wu�.1�.. .....w-+e...i. w�_ _,u.., . .. i ,,., .._, ,..,.......Ma-,.�.1..,rJJ.LL..a.wu.+,v.,l,..k �...., � .- �. .,, .,NM. OREGON BUSINESS ARCHITECTURE PC. I � I II I, II MEMORANDUM Date: March 18,i11993 • To: City �'` of Site Deveopment Review 1 t From: Dan Young AchYtect I Project: 11595 SW Pacific Highway I I 1 I � I Subject: Project description t yon � I , Demolition of e risting service station building. Construction of 5000 square foot, one level retail building and parking Jot per attached site plan. I I II I � I I ,rte I I } I i I I I 1, I I I I � • • III I f I I . 621 SW Alder,Suite 530 Pbrtland, Oregon 97205.503/228-9747 FAX/241-0702 I I , , .. ....).1_, ,,, , AA I -1---- E T E STREET MAPLE!. AF 111 a inn gal ... 1. ct , . _ iii . al, 1 � ff . I , _____ I II PINE I STREET • , 1111 i • 3t g... UV . IIII IF srr ri � I ui SPRUCE tei uIiIIuiI I STREET t , � [ f. , ,_ , 4 t r�.- fil • akii inill ____I,.. , „ '! 1 a i A Ir y � � � ( , _it .......IIIIIII if '''- 3 En 1 ' Nalli NEE p . , t ,i______„____ . . __,1 , An — , . , ii • 4 i I PF.AF~FLE :6 ST: �/ w i A 0 I 1 . I. I ROADWAY \iA i I l i 1111 , • • I , rh r 1 , ',..mr..x, -.1_....:..A„_v,.,N.L.4..L --..,w+,....e�-....,' e.0 L 1 ..,... .,.,�,�. ._, ..a,�... I,J.._...,�.._..._.._. ...,.,..,,..�....+..J.,..�.-v.».w,.W�.-r..-»w-...+.,.._.. �,r,�.,, � .... � r_n.1.,w,....._w_r.,....L._.,._...n�uw.._.. � � - - u.[�.L.�...•r, • r L • , AFFIDAVIT DA� IT OF MAILING , , r 1 1 1 STATE OF OREGON ) ' County of Washington ) Ss.' City of Tigard ) I I 1 , „ r r � r I, S 4 i , ,'I being first) duly Sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say: (Please print) , w That I am a `” ZAS4A for The City of Tigard, Oregon. . r .L ' _,s„�,;,'That 1, served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: r ', 1 �04v4- .That I Served NOTICE or DECISION FOR: ,"_r;h,,; '^ity of Tigard 'Planning Director 1.- "`Tigard Planning Commiesion. .. ' Tigard Hearings Officer ..r... Tigard City Council h • A 'co Pupil c Rear of ce Pict ce e� t e is a t 1 py � i ing � i � .a. f Decision) of which ached' (Marked Exhibit "A") was mailed to each named persona at the address shown orihe attached list marked exhibit "B" on the U4P day of ..� 19 , e ' day of c . , and, 3 9 site saidenotibe NOTICE O DECISION as here attached, was post.d on an appropriate e a at y , in the United States Mail „on the day of , 1913 , • . postage prepaid. 01 ' I I illi I ' Yy"/-' I 1 Prepared I(Notice 11 1 11 1 .1 II r b' f � 1 J 'ri �^fA ,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,;:,' I � � � i ,P Sub' o ,ibe i)d worn/affirm to me orb rho �� Say o a .r..r yf .y a ',,y,nX' 1 1 '� ',`.Cll rl., MTV rr 1�1 Y v I Lv .h fff �t" ', 1 "4 I s L r��' 1 �r 5 Y' y 1 Mi I' ,Po 4..,,,,,:'.NA Itl ,...v1uA ,. r ,.4'3�1J ': 4 a N I �4.rr d/ h A Y r . C3REGON g t1 IM1ry N 1. r 'NOTARY PUDJLIO J r 1 Y, �.�w r r, ty 1;,,,,,-,1.r t � � My CO Expires: « w'9 • .r ,,4.I o,..Pat, , , „T'r.1 3" ' 1 1 I 1 1 I n I r I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I • r 1 I 1 ill 1 1 I I 1 1 I I I • r I 1 1 r r 1 I I am L I, *,.h{! o 1. 6 r u • a • .• NOTICE OF PUBL I C HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION, AT ITS MEETING ON MONDAY, _ August 302 1993 , AT 7 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC • CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BLVD., TIGARD, OREGON, WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO: SDR 93-0007 FILE TITLE: Frranc'esahi • ' APPLICANT: Ken & Jerome Franceschi OWNER: Same 600 Third Street • San Francisco, Off, 94107 • REQUEST: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 93-0007 FRANCESCHI An appeal of an ' Administrative Deciijion approving a request for Site Development Review to allow construction' of a 5,000 square foot commercial retail building. LOCATION: 11595 SW Pacific Highwa (WCTM 1S1 a6DB, tax lot 200) APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: y lopment Code Chapters 18. 2.050, PLTCF�. Community De'V'e 6 18.100, 18.1020 18.106, 18.168, 18.114, 18.120, and 18.164: ZONE: -G General Commercial The C- zone i • 'O 4 � xie al,lowd public agency �, and sex vices, public support aciliUea, p ofe alonsl.' and • administrative r ices, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business ainxt serVices, and eating and drinking a ishnents among other uses. PUBLIC HEAI1JC _ ,4 E . b IN ACCORDANCE r WITH THE RULES THE P � I�G ON THIS MATTER WILL B� CONDUCTS " , Y'°COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE NlENT.CODE OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED OF BY THE TIGARD CI AT CITY HALL CHAPTER 1�l.32, OF THE, COMMUNITY RULES' OI AD �'ORTI'! IN CkiAPTER 18.30. HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET EN TESTIMONY• 9 SE1JT WRITT ., ..._ . ANYONE 'WISHING ONY C)N` THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY'�.,HINC TO PRE DO SO IN WRIT°''WG PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY 1'A'�' B PRESENTED TTED AT THE xCBLTC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC COMMISSION WILL RECEIVE A STA REPORT PRESHNTkTICN PROM THE CITY PLANNEf OPEN THE PUBLIC HEART PUBLIC HARING 1 MEETING TO OBTAIN AD TTONAL INF° RMATtoN, OR CLOSE INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN NUH THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TARE 'ACTION THE APPLICATION ' A PERSON SUBM/TS EVIDENCE �! r AFTER Aucxust 10 1993 SUPPORT ",,... THE APPLICATION x�i N O�THE s , .... • IN SU �: "CO "Ol� �i.F'' , AI+1k PARTY IS ENTITLED TO LNG, REQUEST� THAT OPEN REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE THE HEARING Y ECl CONTINUANCE THE RECOiRE? N'TEI� AT THE HEAR TxNUANCE G FOR ATGL ANY SEVEN DAYS AFTER THE I. . , JC IN EAST B HEARING. P :Ir FROM THE TIOAR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD CO PLAN.. INCL IS OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICA1Mt'REHENSIVE;'' ES COMMUNITY r ... TO THE REQUEST T �� • APPROVAL OR D I F►APPROVAL O F THE REQUEST BY THE COMISSICN WILL BE EASED UPON THESE SE, • fl . , • , ' . , , . „ , . , ,, .. , , , , , , , , , , , , „ , , , • „,, , , , , , , , .,, . , , , , i,' ' . , , , „ , ,,„,. : , . , ', , , , , , , , 1,:,- , ,, , , , , , . ., , .. , ,' „ . , , ,, , , , , „ . . . , , ,,,,,,,,,. , ‘ , .,.. . . ., , , ,, , , , .,. , , , , , II CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. 'HAT THE HEARING' IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS i ' ' RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN 'SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. .- 'FAILURE'TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE �, •,.- ` '' OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT SPECIFICITY TO AFFORD THE DECISION' MAKER AN OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO THE ISSUE' PRECLUDES AN ' ' APPEAL TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED On TART ISSUE. AFL ,DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR '',. INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TEN CENTS PER PAGE. AT LEAST ,1 SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY' OF THE ,STAI`F REPORT WILL B AVAILABLE FOR :',' • ' INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN :9E OBTAINED FOR TEN CENTS PER PAGE. h.; . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE, CONTACT THE STAFF PLAR Victor Adoairi. .' AT , 639-4171, TIGARD, CITY HALL, 13125 I SW HALL BLVD« I, .• . , • , „ 1' , P , 1 , ' �� p ; kF }, , , , ,,: ,.' •-: ' - .', . , ' 11i 1 ® .1�1�1 IILD.©� _ r , no Erni,ion.Ft1llU ,� , • ILrrn:Et 111� E , '1 , ,, , , ,r ill ' ' III imillini ' 1iIilit .. . , ',, : '1, ' ,,, : : , ' '' : : , , , Hums.r amimpla.111.• , - , am: __,.., SPRUCE �� STREET 1�1 Nam u E II 1 „ A , I p a ,, ., . .. .,. , —, , 1 . , ,, , ,„ ., � I I_1, l', ,,„ 1 , ' IIII 41111 , '. ' '' , ' 'M' ill. x 4. I J , alai I / Lt,44. > : , , , ,, , : 1H - mill - ' 'II, : '..— ' ' '': ,i, ' , , : , : ,, -,,,: : , , , , , ,: ,, ' , , , fl!hEF ri,' -' - ,,' ' ' .1 ._._, ‹ 1, ', ,, „-,',,' ,..?-...,., , 1 , , „ , ,, , , , , „ , , 1 , ., • , . . i : „ i„ , , , , , ,,. ., ,, , ", , „ . a , ,, .,c„,, ,,: , ' , Ippr...*' '' ,. ' y ✓ Li r 1 I � MU741 WI C I .�, q 1 4 9�1�� b i i '''' r ' ' '''''.'''''" ' d' ' tip:i ' " ' " ' ' ' '' g ' "''' 9 , , , l' ,. , i } ■ . I 1, I I • . • 3. 136DC-00500 41004.00000000:::117'0".0..0006111 ti ;;;15136D11-430201 " ' ' ',4'4 4.4 4'4 4r 4 4 4 4 4 4 f W•4' I r TOK b TIIFS '1)U)SIE COEIPA fl ar, , 703 ,S� SUITE 605 ATTN: POP1 RTIES DEPT VA11COUVINt. WA 98660 PO BOX 42121 PORMAND OR 97242 ' • 13�6DB�-OO5 1360a-00501 1ER IZIL zaivErsnuctiTs ONION GOSPEL MINISTRIES or PT o t catvavl cat' a GUXT1 PARTNERS=1a % PB A CES(1It, a 11619 SW.PACIFIC, mir 37 SAN MATEO CT • 1E1 Oft 97223 '1ZTa+A CA 9 901 15136011-00100 .44.4444a.4....44.4..4. 15136011—08300 •4i.wOWLei oYrowor CORETN4, GROVET11. 1) AEI) 1110112tYS. aping C DAISI' R 101LE31 II i w 11621 SW PACIFIC i7W 11631 SW racirIc hWY' TICARD► OR 97223 !I OR 97223 15136D0-0090,0 1„4444444.4.. do4.a i 15136011-01000 4,4440 4sw'444wr4rieirr , ' GERIM�#Riiiw ' 1 T� 1�. Ts �LTCR�C 963 SW '1"s'� DR % 1� l11, lL S & D� 963 TMTD PORTLAND OR 97201 , I 14;13608m-02600 +. i 1513608-02601 1 5 1513608-02601 0.—tly 6�� ...shoo 4 O 4 r f o 4!A*owe... I sfraficanfry PSYliLXS T AND ALT B+ CO TRD,ST 6149 621 SW ENGLEWOOI) . I1R. � I� � ��''1, � � Ct�71 � � 97221 6� //yy��ry(■ice■�Qj � � OS� �9 4 034 I, 1 • 605 02602 .,. STEPTAIEtt, ■4 `, 4 _ 621 6IN ,.4.` ..D DRIvz 1' . ` ' M ••• . , 3 1 , I , Y , 1 & JEtICVIE .D.**+.X 1 . 1 SAN "FIZANCISCO CA 94107 I M 5 SW ,, litrkrol oil„ 7Y�y,�2�,3�{ I I II I I 1 I 1 , I , I I I li I I I I I I I I \ I t I ,.... .ee,:..•.J....:ea.0 .w, , „s. .r xn. . ...........r r. ,• ..I , 1,....... s..,.,r•,.., r .,,., ,.. • .,,... .,.....,. ,4,a. .....•.. I.„ ...,,, - ,.. .,. ` .,.. n.. i. r . . . - I 114 r I 13136DC-00500 • ••••••• ,• do '. 81 DBE-off )1 . .. TOM. �O ER THEATRES. DUAE COMP NY .. , 703. .BROADWAY SUITE 605 ATTN a PROPERTIES DEPT ' . � " . VANCOUVER WA ' 98660 1 PO: BO 9212].- PORTL1AND: 'OR 97242 ' ~• - 1513�r DB-00500 o••d u w d.d it d d, 151.36D$-00501. •w •d�'••••'•••'J COMMERCIAL INVESTMENTS UNION GOSPEL MINISTRIES OF PTI,D , .• % G VANN' & GTJITRON PARTNERSHIP, I I ' % FRANCESCHI, 'JEROME �& KENNETH .�619 SW PAGI,E'IC W? 37 SAN MATZO CT �L C:Ai 94903 9 X23 SAN RA `AF o `r • 1536Da—no700' •a•od•d �� , DB-U 'CORBIN, GROVER D AND I : ; ' MORRIS, JOHN C ,D: ttSY E , ° I HELEN L 11621 SW PACIFIC NWY , I I 1 1163 . SW. PACI 'IC. HWY '. � ' TIGAR.D OR ' 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 15136Ds=oo9or ••.d....... .4 d p 1 1s136D B-�oiooa GENSMAN, MITCHELL EDWARD GENSM , LEE R & ALICE L .�, % GENSMAN, MITCHELL E & DEBORAH . • �T OOA7 DR • WESTWOOD 963. S'W 1 I PORTLAND 'Oft 9 7 2 01. ! ' 9 6'3 WESTWOOD ' 9 1201 ' ' . I POR 'LAND 023 7 I 16,1B6DB,-02600 d d,• d'!r d it I• 1S136D8 . �grda•d'e,• d'w ^026na. ••"+ ' : : STEWARD.', PHYLLIS T AND '�; 1 ALPROP CO STEWART TRUST I ' 6149 SW SHATTUCK. RD • 6 21'SW ENGLEWOOD Dl 1L PORTLAND'OR', , 9'7 2'21 • . LAKE OSWEGO OR 97034 y/� r� ry • • 36 � 02E10z •��b�•d•o •d.o'Y'i� •,d.• • •� • :L51 D , 621 , LAKE. OR 97 0 • � 1 I I 1 I I I, I I • I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I r I I I I r I I Y I I I I I I I t I I I • r III �� „, I 1 I r 1 r l I 1 I I I r r i iii i i r I I I I I l • r � I I.� " • n Yn ... SEE MAP , 0 N IS I 36DS • Id REMAINDER IN y I ',� 6 A C� 4 I � MAP I5 I 36DB or I _f?,No 0,6 Yh '*.n • !- - i a I 1 qr Y,{w" n Ila) ti) s. ■ MMJ(/y � � , , -ICJ'./24c. C fir) d I a , 0 ro , I J A N, s I A• • )< Q" + h 0. �a 1r1 I-- I 7/,/' / I m +Y . • 8A°1 'E . 158.0 1 412 I I S4 I • � 300 y. /jJ/y r I , • 4 1~ I ir' . 1 I y I • 24 400 w • I I i r I I 'r I I E1.' \ , I lo �^ da�l/, I i I�I I I I ''� w ti4 n351 4�i n 1, I. I. \y • \., te , • a 0 al ., 'e 1 5 I I ti) t\ r I I • _ 2 `t 2 T¢W I�EGI I / ' 2 5 9-'419 2 $ 5 20 73, 96 I . I I qn . 2501 4 i I io V . I 00 34 ,W G I 1 � I I I CA y 31 a a v j1I 19 Q) �•'' ' 1 1 e I I I I `°I` (S.W. DUV ii~r STREET I '- W 1 _ VACATED I� I I I •---" ----,. ....._ A�A Y' "-{' 19 3�15 � M' �,,�,� ,.., ,' 0 I lU A 11 , I I I 1 � I I I, 1 I 1 . I i I 1 I , I o i i �p I ` I °I OI I , f 1 ll 1 I � bi ry „ - » 1141 YM `w i i'. I i f di' F I 1 I I I”' I I \ b.' . f,75 I _ a� . I 5 o'r 1 2 I \ I I ' I 1 , ri ti n o N u • • \ '. . . . ' a . , . : • ' . '1 • ..1' !--,r,r,,,,,:, ;:':'''.:'.:e.:..,.'''''r''',;"'''''''..' 5,..,,, ,,,i,L,'. ' ' A 4 WI/4 v S 61,,,• I� WASHINGTON N COUNTY �: OREGON, O , .' SCALE 1 00! ' I I ,I I • 1 .• , , , , . . . , , ,, . . ' rANC�.LIEQ TAX LOTS• E7 ,•,.. ,. ,H .,H .• , . , . .. • „ . . 1 . . . , ,1, I ' 'S E E I'M A P, 5505,3501 3502,36Q3,550{�1 . • . , ,. . , : • , . . . „ . , ,, , „ .1. ., ,, , ,, , ,. : , 44AI;T?0 THROUGH x00,a I s' 1 3G fA ' ' 2 4O 1,. , . . , „ I I 4 I W caR,W. . .a . Ias� „., . Im ,, ..., . ., , . . . . , . . . I a � J„ i , I. , •6 8 1,66, i . o . . . " .,. . , 'I ' ' 101 ''Z 300 , 1 a :` c. I, )A i I s •'�? �. r 6 , v 1 f Rf .e3 y® . .400' ?00 ;�` 'A' ' ,k., �, .564cF O� 'ts�.A c. r~ I I 7 M ::_3;;_ a!Lo _ot y I . . e cc rr.r� w"rwl" rrr . , \ .rte �.�,f ",,.",�� , y T W k' 1 :lIJ ! ,9Y :x5' , \ f ........�.... �, ....�.,...:._. y. I 5. ., ,,,, ,. I N „NEGlN 12Z q �, P ,E R,1. T0.,� �', s� \ � 4 17A. 3 rr. Ji/ 4 i� iii✓', iris .. •'ijr�rC ,`%� $r,., .,rir iii �rrii iii rr.' C: , ” ", ..tr 'L -..50. �. r dr 3I ?0 3000 900 2800 270( 7O 2G. ry ,.. . .7 , Via, i:: 0 V M, ,.., .. 4'1 ' 1 an ro : 11 � dti 1n ad � 4 fry \ I 't1 1 fl .'' I `sr j , E UP. , I 3200 1 • h Er I i I , co � :©RAINi c E' «I EM T r I. ti -eg -- r-- —7-r _M � 50? I � m. o'•n coV c wr i, :.6 I `r V I � ` I 1. . I 'fi' .,., ,._::i..„...,•....._,.1. ....,. J.. ., ..,ii a.. - _--i ...._.. ._ ...,..,n,.,u✓A.,.,. ,w.,. ,.._.,. ., , ,.,+..,....-.,« .,..,..r.4.,.,t'.nl.a..,..u.,.,_,......,Y.,:.J,.:f,.:,:,..,., , :'.:.s; h REL�EST FUR COMMENTS TO: DATE: __April ?1 1993 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 98-0007 FRANCESCRT (NPO #8) A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 5,000 Square foot coMmercial retail building. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18r62.050, 18.1000 18.102, 18,106, 18.108, 18*114, 18.120, and 18.164« LOCATION: 11595 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 181, 36D8, tax lot 200) ZONE: C-G (General Commercial) The C-G zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, • professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support serviees, and eating and drinking • establishments among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish ' to comment on this application, we need your comments by May 8, 1993. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. • If you are unable to respond by the above date,, please phone the Staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 18125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. • STAFF CONTACT: Victor Adoriri � I I PLEASE C E �' CHECK THE H FOLLOWING THAT APPLY:ITEMS THAT' We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. �., Please contact of our office. , „,,.�,�,;_,..• Pl.ease refer to the enclosed letter.. , I I I Written Comments: I I I I I I I I I , � I I i Name' of Person Commenting: I i Phone Nutrtber. • I ! I1 i I i I I I i I I I I i I I • ! Q NO` IFICATTOtJ LIST FOR ALL APPLICATIONS 1. NPO N0. (2u.Hopi es CPO Nb` • , 2. CITY DEPARTMENTS I 1 .c Buildin g Official Brad R. Parks &'Recreation Board . Police City Recorder Field Operations Engineering/Chris D. I Permits Facilitator/Viola G. • 3. SPECIAL DISTRICTS /Fire,District School Dist No. 48 a! (Pick-up box) (Beaverton) Joy Pahl PO Box 200 eavertan, OR 97075 . ■ Tigard Water District School IDist. '23J - 8777 SW Burnham St. (Tigard) Tigard, OR 97223 i 13137 SW Pacific Hwy. Tigard, OR 97223 . Tualatin Valley Water District Unified Sewerage lgeflcy/SWM Program 6501 SW Taylors Ferry Rd. 1551N. First St. 'Tigard, OR 97223 Hillsboro, OR. 97124 • 4. AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS' Wash. Co. Land Use & Transp. Boundary Cammissirin 150 N. First Ave. �~ 32b SW Stark Room 530 Hillsboro, OR 97124 Portland, OR "97204 • ___ Brent Curtis .. IieVin Martin METRO Mike Borrenon .___r., 2000 SW last ave. , -"- Scott King Portland, OR 97201-5398 Fred Eberle DLCD (CPA's/ZOA'd) City of Beaverton •_.__ 1175 Court St. NE . - Jim^Bendryx - Principal Planner Salem, OR 97310-0590 , PO Box 4755 11 Beaverton, OR 97076 Other City of King city City of Durham City Manager City Manager 15300 SW 116th PO Box 23483-3483 Ring'City, OR 97224 tigard, OR 97224 , City of Lake Oswego City of Portland . - City,Manager Planning Director' 380 SW A 1120 SW 5th Lake OUWego, OR 97034 Portland, bit 97204 state Highway Division orAn • Bob Doran Lidwien'Rahmann II PO Box 25412 9002 ss McLaughlin'B1vd. Portland,' OR 97225-0412 MilWaukie, ORI. 97222 City of Tüalatin PO Box 369 tUalatin, OR 57062 5. SPECIAL AGENCIES "" • General hone / • 8W Main St. 14655 sW Olde;c;Scholia . General Elec.p Brian Moore ' 12460 b Fry. 1 „Tigard, OR 97223 Beaverton, OR 97007 td/ NW Nattira1 one Metro Area Cofmuticationn Scott Palmer Jaaon'Uetitt , 220 NW Second Ave, twin baks Technology'Center' Portland, OR 97209 1815 NW 169th Place 8-6020 97006-4886 TCI Cahlevisian of Oregon .' Mike Ball ock US West 3500,SW St. .__w-. Pete Nelson, Portland,. OR 97201 421 SW Oak St. ,,Portland, OR 97204 Columba Cable (prank Stoney 14200 SW Brigs loon. Ct. t 'I'ri Met transit Dem. Beaverton, OR 97005 Kim Knox 4012 SE 17th'Ave,' 6. L91ATE AOENCIfS Portland, Olt, 97207. ronautics Div. (ODOT) BC OA4 T „__� Division of Strite Lands 11 ;: _ , Con�werce Dept. . Pl:H. Park w_.., d41'11.�R Fish 4 Wildlife Pp, . of vir ' Deept in' ori. Quality 7. FEDERAL',AcinnaxES Cor.•pd. bf Engineoro i +but Office 8. O'er Southern Pahl fic 'Transpbrtation Company ' phone M. Forney,;PLS - Project Engineer 800 NSA 6th AtYardi�e R. 24 Dion station i R 3 n �. n i J PO..cla._.d bR 97209 I ' • I I I I I , • l 1 3 V � Y' . kr, 00 r „..wi le AA,ru.r■A A.«...,te ,.4 A,:.ra J_. rl.i .J. 1:.4x:r 4 so, 1 K. a ryw .».. w.w . L'. 1,.MM a.u• ww»w, a rti.a t J. MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Ed Murphy, Community Development D a •`; Dick Bewersdorff, Senior Planner FROM: Cathy Wheatley, City Recorder `--' DATE: August 2, 1993 SUBJECT: Appeal of Director's Decision - Site Development Review SDR. 93-0007; Eranseschi w Owner/Applicant Dick, attached is the appeal received from Richard B. Buono, Vice President of the Duane Company reference the above.Site Development' Review Director's Decision. Duane Company was listed as a recipient of the Director's Decision and because of this appear to. me to be entitled to Notice and, thus, have standing to appeal the decision. The appellant should also be apprised of the Planning Commission hearing date as soon as possible. Thanks. I I� I I I I I I I I u I I II I I I I III I I r I I I I I II I II I , I r i I tti,.�.,...r .,w...e w,.A. ..x ,..•......,, �. .,...., eW i...vY nl I.., „. ..i,.. _ ��,y.. r u.r ^,.. ,�•.. e A , M� '" , Y i�' 1 ,• . I' , 1 s i y. 'ba..l_,4 a+-. »,+L. w.�w..., i�.r.,w:.:iuYH.«, >fi'��uwt�s+w.yd,s+>ww�.�wr,.r•w.a•r+•.,,.+��u.,w .�= ,-,.-,.,c„.1`�,.--m. k w ",M«r.�Y,,,..,,. ., v„ ''''''7'''."*.'"'.'',+m wry aw+nawt"'"',`",''.''''t» uvww',r.."""'x w'''''r'''''''''''''••.+..''''ar r*'"T^w^o-',11 r r. r I I III , � r I. 1 W+ . ) H 4 IY 1» ,1 M 4� IyW 4 , 5 • .M } W r .r. n W M Ny W Y } 9 f NY l ,u w , 14 h M ee M � M w, 1 r ,�,�11IY i r' I �,�r� i'� or i ,i± �� ,iMk�,,C„„�i*" t I � '�'�'i�",�I'�"�I• . I��",:i�i«»�� '� lei � I ; Rai �i�' dl` .ili i {p�� w'�r' COMPANY I E.i,� AMOUNT' ; 0,„ 0 , i • NAME 'T,+4M iN M1N 1"W't;" iw E.st 4 151, i St C,11JlO 1 r rfi°KwwY fit�i,:.0� P Y'f''ii~N 1 1. 'TE 4 + '` 1;`: !.-'; l ;, I I I i(i r rt., t4t1t)4 t311 ' i ' SU V I f3.:ir O r k, �� rte' f�� M�I { Ipr�(1 �'• { w�r1./1•�.»4 ,!:r,�M�, wN! ,r1r �jyW� /■�`1 {)�� w ,,� ay%`11�. PUR 1j$E:: ct 'N'I iW4" 1 I'I E.i:"11'1* ,1},Mt i1./ i`� i • D PU R�$IUH FN.: .11 •Y��!}Yi M t f�•i'tI L'N R.�T (,111. •� vN'MMw4.4rA>uNWwA4M WlWkuNh,,KN,IalMM4r11wM.,MWM1VIMHw we r �tlnh 1 ltrN vHN.ar11WN t, N ».,�I.p}MWwY MW^N MN NiVd��.....•N»h»M/Moom••1uNN»WYipMMUh•4 +YIN»4MI.wNWhUNW 4HM� krkNp`NNWMH NIMSW,WM,NIM',.•,.•••••••,• i � 7 ..!I( • I r " ,' u I w w YI 1 , 4• r . 1I I 4 I I ( I I I I r„ I I I I I I r I' � I I I I PI I � I i r I I I I I 1 I I i I I I I G I I I I I I I II I l. II I I I I r I r I I'. . . �,.. . I I ' I , Si, AC I LAND USE DECISION APPEAL FILING FORM • The City of Tigard supports the citizeri`s right to participate . local government, i a d s Land U se n 1II t , I Code therefor( sets out specific requirements for ,.-- filing appeals on certain land uSe decisions, 1 � OF TG .'� I � 1 The following form has been developed to assist you in ' filing an appeal of a land use decision in proper„ . � form, To determine what filing fees will be required' ' or to answer any questions you have regarding the • appeal process, please contact the Planting Division or the City Recorder at 639-,4171, 1 APPLICATION BEING APPEALED: SDR-93-0007 «Mwwwl...r,..r..rr.rw««rwrMlrwr......rlr. FRANCESCHI, OWNER/APPLICANT I � 2, I-KM DO YOU QUALIFY A8 A PARTY:,r,DUANE COMPANY I S4•THE OWNER OF THE , ADJOINING PR PR O PERT( WHICH IS LEASED TO FRED MEYER, INC: 3 SPECIFIC GROUNDS FOR APPEAL OR REVXEWs, ;,,PLEASE SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A � I .r ,I TO APPEAL ' NN.ww,w.«lw....w•Iw.N.I«.r1rN.d:wM•»N • �1+.,."ww.4w•.�..w.lrw.w�«••ww/«.w«w..11:..wwMMMw«w.««..wti..«u.•... • ''{rr!+«w{,....1M� • ,uM...ww.t.r �� .N •� wiC;yy.•�•-,�",'•.•"�', ' • .....rrwMry.r»»r+.Mw.Nww«w{»«••r«w.iiM«:•M•ww{W+M.MM.Mwrll«.!«»«NI.NN.wires.WwJWw+,+ldwwN«r"r•Mw.il«II«..w.w14{NifwMl.4w«.r'rlwwrwrlwrM4r«.' ' .l �.Mww«{.•+1w • , ...4�' � � I «»4«NNwiNN««»44N«««ww4...',,w11rNr.ir.i.• 1Mr444«.«MMr4w ��•.'+.44j4.N{««rrr•4wM«/Nr««.«MwN•..4Nwlw»rwrwWrrwrwr«rw"wNwlNMwrNi'Mlwr«41«M.."... _ WM«1 ..,. { I I ' ^ � wrIw4WINM«wwrrlMrw«rwiwNMNr«w•,1Nrrr,rl,rr««Nw«rMNwNrrwW««rS«rwNrrl4rr'rrn • 1 ��" Ir•w«• �-` ' � 1 LYw«r«wrr � ' � ' �' � ww rw.«Nw. ++ 14.«...J.4«.r.«rN wir.«r.r.w«w..N:«4', • • • r • • • •• 4rww.{.�.. " ,• �I - «Mlr«rwJ+..w«w«Nrrl«ww�MNN"Nww.rlN...,.MN..ww Nw. wM . I ' r.1Nw.�114Nww,rWlwrr•wwN�rrwrr+i4wM«W1wwuW4N•Wwwwr«rn wWW.{r•wwwii«r,,... .wll:...lr ..ta . „»Nwww.4"4.M.Mw«w ' .•�1 {rrww4�.rw«r,�Nlirr _. .�N:.yr�f�wN . 1w{w»wNw«».w»wrwwNr.wl�.wl+MJwY»M4+rwMr«wirwwriNw«.N•LINwH"�+4wNw.41w14Nr1rrwiwW {'.�MwWw".wiw.«u«.wwiw•Wrwrl.N{.-..ww.M- wwwrn4wwrwrL+.- , __. _ ',I � h ' --we.:.•ww..M..wr.r+.:.«ww' � .ww.w...w..wr«»4..«.«+.«aw..wi«w+«:w..�..w .._ ,.w.1..{�, .,w...+w.{w..........1' � .ire., .� ». '• � �' 4w4ww«w•lwww. ,•,. +Ir.ww4lw««:{M...M» ww.w«w««w.lrw.«.M.w,. + 14Nw4ww.rw.w r�i-" ...4..r.. .r..«,.....«www 4. SCHEDULED DATE DECISION IS TO BE FINAL: AUGUST 11, 1993 5. DATE NOTICE or N vl fL DECISION WAS GIVEN: JULY 23, 1993 wM.w».. sN U "I"U E .6 : DANE, COMPANY BY: if � " ' A RU P. U ON O VICE P R E S ID E NT 400000 34'004 x-x"x«Kw "* X4(4)00000 ?04 ' -8:4 fit'(" x, 1t.. {x, . „ay{..}t,�(-x-}i Y4'�t?t°?�it~}N444 i-xe-x444 xwh`x{x-Kxr�f x44-x-g-} *x4(- EQR OFFICE USE ONLY R c a i vcd By; a� h /yp'N"Iyr� Date t " /4P Time t 3485 " 1'". _ ' ./M.�..4 AI:>hSrove cl As To rorM BY: � ✓/ Uat g 1 j .' :_Time: , t� " „ '��""►o Denied' A s To I� ,,,iti i�y l «44 Iw ww.»r.wr.w..Da__Date: Time Receipt No �- sadp �,J1 Aiitourit N ww{wM_.wM w,w .....r..1Mr.....:l..r..r« M•ww.r� w4w4N4444.MM:�yMr4..W NwN. �+ X)t�-,f••u- �' Y � 3t 1d-x-�4-�E-1E�F• �c"u>�x x�c i�>�•x"�x K�w�-�»�i��»�«x rcw� �-��tw�"r4�cw�»u��c s�»>r��y , 13125 SW Holt Blvd,Pa Box 23397,Tigard,O'rOgor 97223 (508)689.4171- b • I I I I , I I I I EXHIBIT A TO APPEAL OF SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR93-0007 The Applicant filed an Application for Site Development Review , showing two access points, one being a direct access to Pacific Highway (Highway 99) and the second being a shared access with Appellant at the southeasterly corner of Applicant's property. The Amended Notice of Decision for the subject Site Development Review gives the following as an approval condition: • "2. A revised site plan shall be submitted for approval , through t he city ty engineer, which address(es) the location of the access point and minimizes the traffic conflicts, In addition no direct access onto Pacific Highway shall be permitted." The City of Tigard's Condition of Approval No. 2 denied the access point to Pacific Highway and requires the Applicant to revise it site development plan to show the shared access configured to minimize traffic conflicts. The condition invites either confirmation of the location of the shared access point or relocation of the shared access point. The condition does not specify what will be acceptable. COMMENTS BY APPELLANT IN SUPPORT OF APPEAL No time limit is given for re-submission of the site plan. The . . Applicant could submit e revised site plan after the end of the appeal p eri od thereby denying p agties with • standing to appeal the information needed on which to base an appeal , The City of Ti gard's • Condition also states that the revised site plan shall be reviewed and the City Engineer who is not n a nd a roved by " 9 authority approved y y �ng�ne w t eve approve Site Sete Development Reviews by the Tigard Community Development Code. 2: Section 18,120.120 p 0 the Tigard a Community Development Code states s that the p eop ased site develo p ment � plan (required for�Site ' bevelopment Review by Section 18..120.090..0. and by Section 18.120.120) must show the location and dimensions of entrances and " Condition of Approval No exits on the site. Since C � " " . 2 imposed by the the Tigard denied the entrance/ Highway stated city of T� entrance/exit t�' on Pacific c ��gJ�VUay and ��stet �� h . access o��, t �t dd �site the �l location ��the 'shared that th revised site plan must a re cation of share be e n. i s clear that k'the s i to devel opment plan purported to t k : k a p , the provisions feSertl�ndl Community �p y. with pp o�ded b the " Notice of Dec�s�on does not comply p visions o 8.120,120. of the Tigard Community Development Code as the 'location and dimensions of the I entrances and r exits are not shown on the approved site development plane I , , I : I • „ ( Exhibit A Page 2 3. If the Applicant's site is to be served only by the access point shared by Appellant, substantial traffic accessing both the Fred Meyer store, the Les Schwab facility and other shops as well as the Applicant's 5,000 square foot commercial/retail facility will have to be accommodated through this shared access point. Applicant is the beneficiary of a triangular easement on Appellant's property however, that easement only provides access to the most southerly twenty-five feet of Applicant's easterly property line. This easement area is wholly insufficient to handle ingress and egress to the combination . of Applicant's site and Appellant's site. Using the easement area as Applicant's principal ingress point could cause substantial stacking for both left turning and right turning traffic movements from Pacific Highway into Applicant's site. Stacking could severely hamper the operation of Pacific Highway at this location. The most logical access point for Applicant's property is the access , point Applicant proposed on Pacific Highway in the site development plan submitted or at a point accessing Pacific Highway somewhat further down site to the southwest from the access point shown in the . site development plan. The joint access presently in effect to Applicant's site using the existing easement across Appellant's property should be discontinued • so as to properly separate traffic attempting to gain ingress to and egress from each site. Such a provision would create less impact to traffic on Pacific Highway than the concept requested by the City of Tigard through Condition No. 2 of the Amended Notice of Decision. At most the shared access point should be a secondary point rather than a primary point of ingress and egress to Applicant's propertY. 4. Section 18.120.180.A. of the Tigard Community Development Code provides that the director shall make a finding with respect to Chapter 18.108 (Access, Egress and Circulation) when approving with conditions or denYinv, an Application for Site Development Review, ■ The Amended Notice of Decision had one finding with respect to Section 18,108.080, That finding was that the access way is shown to provide the required twenty four foot pavement width for a two-way commercial access way. Such a finding is invalid in as much as Condition No. 2 for approval • stated that the site plan must be resubmitted showing the shared % , access point revisited and the direct access to Pacific Highway deleted. Since neither access as shown on the site development plan was approved, no access is shown on the plan and therefore it cannot be concluded that the site plan provides the required twenty-four • foot pavement width for a two-way commercial access way. 4-v I I I I I I I I' • • 4r„-l.w.A„!:.�. a....,«...,..t.t.,..-�_..-,.�.�.�«- « 4 .,^.,..,a «..,„ i.., Exhibit A Page3 II 4 I �I I { 5. The Section 18,108.060 of the Tigard Community Development Code . speaks to referring applications for permits to the Planning Commission for review if the proposed access causes or increases hazardous traffic conditions. Appellant submits that if access is fi .r limited to the existing easement at the joint access point, hazardous traffic conditions will be caused or increased and therefore, the Application should be referred to the Planning Commission for decision. • • I � I I ( I f, I I I • I I • I {, • • • • • • • I I II I i I I I I I I I I I I I I ” I ' r I I U I I I r I I r I tl I r I I I I r I I { I I I I' II I I II I I I I A I I I I I I I I w I I I , x��, I,.,�'., ..w.I,.^,:,....� ',I .�.,',,,.�,$,., ,.�{,'�.,��'r ,..-„�. ..,..� r,. ,.,.,. ,.,.. -.., r .,.,.,. „r. ,-, .,. •„r,.«, .... ., ,r �..,. ., ,.,, .•.r, .....M., r. ..,I�I� ,. .,,,,r .��. .....,,., I ..1.,`.,.,,,.. , ..,..,«,�i',' r , • M_1 r,. 'fx., J ,.1.i .v.l' -xl-m' ..., :. l-.... ..,.,. .. 'I. ,,,,..,:...-rr.x.....r. .x.,.t,.. ........r ..r r- v. .-i __ -,.,,... ..._ .....,....•..,..+,. ..r ., -> Y r . r I } CITY OF TIGARD AMENDED 'INOTICE OF DECISION SITE TE DEVELOPMENT NT REgIEw S DR 93-0007 4 FRANCESC.HI -- OWNER / APPX,I!,..A.NT I i ' , 1 . I I APPLICATION: A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 5,000 square foot commercial retail I : building. Zoning: CMG (General Commercial) Location: I I 11595 SW Pacific Highway (WC2M 1S1 36DB, tax lot 200 SE TIDN I - DEC ISION:I S�61 s p��a�a is hereby given th at the Planning w Director's designee f or the City of Tigard has APPROVED VED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and r conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section II. CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE • THE I FOLLOWING CO OF BUILDING PERMITS. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, THE STAFF CONTACT SIALL BE CHRIS D ES THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. - AVI OF 1. A revised site plan shall be submitted for approval which Ir I I indicates the provision of the following: One disabled perso n Parking space, and one bicycle parking space. A revised landscaping p lan which shows the rovision of a minimum 15% landscaping as required by code. The revised I plan sha ll l include the to tal square footage devoted fo landscaping. STAFF CONTACT: Victor Adonri, Planning Department r I A. for 2. � revised�site plan shall be submitted foz appa�oval, through the City Engineer, ,w address the location f the access hatch o point and minimizes the traffic conflicts In addition, no • r direct access onto Pacific Highway shall b e permitted. !} use and maintenance agreement shall be executed and , recorded for all common The agreement Jr A joint referenced on and become part of all applicable shall parce�: Deeds The agreement shall be reviewed b he Engineering y Department prior to recording ^ r . I I The applicant , shaI Ll obtain a permit front State of Or®g" on 1 Highway Division, to perform work within the right-of-way of - Highway 99. A dopy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. a I r I 5. The applicant... shall meet 'the requirements of the t0regon I '' f the • -ofwa,lates to the De ark frontage o' h site ' • NUtrx CL 0? DEcnION tiD I 93-0007 . E7ANCLS C Dx I+1WE 1 I I „ I I I I I II I I II I I I II • I II I i , I I II' i I I I II i r I ' I 1 I r • I i r I I I , 'y I r / SECTIONS IN ADDITION THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE; SECTION 18. 120.060 BONDING AND ASSURANCES and SECTION 18.164 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS. COPIES MAY BE OBTAINED THROUGH THE PLANNING OR ENGINEERII_ G DEPARTMENTS I' I r II THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHINI EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE DATE OF THE FINAL DECISION. I i I I I I I I I I I I SECTION II. FINDINGS OF FACT 1 Background: g I I'I I I I I I .I I I The suo ect site i s currI entl Y y developed with an existin g gas station building which is proposed to be demolished. No I , subsequent land use applications have been filed with the 9fu PP City for this site. . I 2 Vicinity Information: I I » The subject site is located on SW Pacific Highway adjacent the southwest of Fred Meyers:;Shopping Center. The to th ;�hwest corner strrbuading properties are zofled C-G (General Commercial) , I I I and are substantially developed.ed. � I � I I I . 3. Site Information an d Proposal P osal Descrr i t�on,. . The subject sia j ect parcel is approximately 0.35 acres in size and was as gas station. 2h existing building is still on site, and is proposed to be demo lished. Access to site is available from SW Pacific Highway. the sib it The applicant pr. o P osc s to construct a Lr 0�a square foot l ' commercial retail building. . • I . . e applicant .have submitted it��d a t�a��ac study after we co mp leted our comments. The a pP licantsengineer implied, t hrou gh the tr affic study, that if the access on Pacific � . Highway were 'closed, there would traffic e. I c on fl. i ctss thereby requiring both access points. While do disagree with this statem ent, it is also our opinion that with I t o current. access L locations th ere are also the concerns with traffic cmnflirts • � �� We I aie :. reviewed tI he situation and„ ..fee l I there are alternatives which could alleviate the traffic Conflicts.O ne alternative is to Change the location of the buildin I and move the east a ccess point as far as possible. II NU + .,. . '� CDR 93 Ob(� FICES�Hx � 7 OF' DEQ�5TC3�1 7 PAGE 2 I , I , I I I I I I I r I II I I I I I I I � I I I . t��.� . .. . ..s.. ..�. ...,.. ,rig.i. r.. i., . ...� yea � ....,��.,. i..�.r .. r• .,.i.....,. ., .. ..,. ., .....,r e• r �n•..� I��.... 1 I I M.. t I I I } I I Therefore, the applicant should be required to provided a revised site plan which addresses the access issue. I I I I 4. Agency and. NPO Comments I q , I 5 I • N r V l . ' 'The, City of Tigard Nui�,ding Division has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: Catch basins are to be approved by the City's Pi.umbing Inspector. . I The Tualatin Valley Fa re & Rescue #1 reviewed d t has proposal and has offered the following comments: Fire ll hydrants are required within 250 feet of all I I portions b ort�.ons of the structure .�re »anPasured around the outsa..de and along access roadway. Plans .shall be submitted to the Fire District 1 for .review and approval. , The State of Oregon Highway Division has reviewed this proposal and has offered t he followi n q comments: a nts. v A. joint use access will only be permitted on the east end of site. / of Curbs and sidewalks to be constructed to C r n 5' lk current standards. . ... o Applicant shall obtain the necessary ry permits from ,), Oregon. IDepartinen of Transportation for access and other work within the right-of,,-way. The Neighborhood Planning Or g g anizstion #8 has reviewed this proposal an has offered the following comments: I 1 , The handicap parking site is not Van accee ssible. Tualatin Valley. . I � all e y Water District,� GeneralLL Telephone and Electronics, Tigard Fublis W ks, School Dist ract #s (Jr Northwest Natural Gas, Portland General Electric have reviewed this application and have offered no comments or objections. 392eTtON III. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION COMPLIANCE WITH CON..mJNTT� U��OPFf CODE SECTION S: S The applicant ha al indicated tha t the proposed ne. w Use of this site is for General Retail Sales. This use is NOTICE OF D5cISiOtf 8DR 93=-0007 FRANcsScEl POE 3' I 1 I I I I I 1 I II I I I I I II I I I I I. o • I I I I { W{, • I I I classified in Code Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as General Retail Sales. Code Section 10.62.030 allows General Retail Sales as a permitted use in the General Commercial zone section on l $ 06�.05 0 states that there eis no xiniYu tlo t area for parcels in the C-G zoning district. The average minimum lot width shall be 50 feet. This site is approximately 15,417, square feet in size with an average minimum lot width of approximately 180 feet. Developments within the C--G zoning district are required to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping� a. on t • , �'� xig the site. Of the approximately 15,417 square foot site,' the applicant has proposed to retain approximately. 10,417 square feet of existing land for landscaping and other improvements. Applicant has not indicated the actual square footage devoted for landscaping. Therefore, a revised preliminary landscaping plan shall be provided which shows the provision of a I n inznun 151 landscaping as required C..G zoning district. Th e l site shall also include the square footage devoted for landscaping. Section 18.62.050' requires specific x c set bac s for developed 4 sites in the C-G zone which abut residential zoning districts. Since this parcel' is surrounded on all sides by other p r properties which ar e al so C-G, no building setbacks are required. I I • Section 18x105. )3QjC 44 (Minimum Off Screet Parking ng Requirements General Retail Sales) ll requires one parking • ., . I space fo each 400 square -f e�t of gross floo . .,area. The e Commercial retail building approximate ly 5,OQO square feet. Commercial 1 re tai f building o f this . xze Ire qu r e the provision of a Minimum of thirteen (13) paring. spaces. The site plan indi cate s that thirteen (13) parking spaces wIll be rovide i° Therefore, the preliminary enn�n ite P a meets number of parking spaces re�i d and satisfies • I , this Code requirement • The • Americans wa t h Disabilities Act (ADS ) , v. h,l i, c ; h became of fedtive on January 26, requires it e� nn a disabled person parking Sp aces if 1 t o 25 p ar c parking � s a prov provided. The Proposed sato plan does not show a provision for One dasablec person parking space: Therefore, a revised site plan Shall be submitted which p ro"ides for one disabled i .. g space, person parkin pace • I I II I I ., dTh e preliminary site p la n indicates that one riv e e a y near • ,• . ` 'I the southeast, portion of the site to provide access to 13 parking spaces, The preliminary site plan a l so indicates provision i� on f another driveway at the southwest corner of the , , I N'brICS of bE drsxb i l SD 't 93--0007 - FRANCE8C111 PACE 4 I I . I Ip I 1, k • I i I I I I 1 I I i I I I , I I I _ I I I I I. I I I I I f I • I I I I I I I I ' • ,y�rY 1 1` P I • „ I i site. Therefore, the requirements for Code . qu Section 18 4108.080 which states that commercial development with`99 or Less required parking spaces provide a minimum access width of 30 feet and a mia imunit pavement 'width of 24 feet. This code requirement has been satisfied. Code Section 18. 10 6.02 0 •„(P'� requires 'one bicycle parking space for each 15 vehicle parking spaces in any development. Since 13 parking spaces are to be provided on this site, one, bicycle parking space is required for this development. , Therefore, the site plan shall be revised to show ,a minimum of one bicycle parking space. As per Section 18.108.08004 the accessway is shown on the i to provide the 2 4 preliminary site � plan � �1,.. . e � fraol;. i pavement width 'for a two-way commercial acces sway a Code Section 18.108.050 j.6 tequires 1 that a aikcway shall extend from the main ground floor entrance, of all commercial developments l to th e street I which provides the required ac cess and egcess a The proposed sit e p lan indicates the provision of such a pedestrian access. Therefore, this code I ' requirenront has been satisfied Se Lion 18. 100.030 (Street Trees) • states that all de velopment projects fronting on a public street more, than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with the st , Section 18.1.00.035 This site 'fronts on SW Pacific Highway for approximately 170 feet.r 1 n Therefore,_� , e trees are required.dI . - „ Section . 100.035 requires that street trees ze s spaced 2 nd 40 fee t apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium large) . Th e preliminary site plan indicates proposal of approximately four (4) street trees to be planted on the site. Therefore, this code requirement has been �niatisfied. Section 10.102 (Visual Clearan e Areas) requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners' of all • • property adjacent� r p to intersecting right-of-ways h t-i f- aay ... s, o r . the he intersection of a public street and a private driveway q A 1 clear vision area shall n�i� veh i c le� hed ge p alt] g d fl nc e, wall s truc t�r�r o r temporary or permanent o bs t ruction (except for a,rn occasional utility p ole or ore e) r exceeding feet h eight M measured fro I the to p of the curbt or where n o curb exists, from the street line g ra de. Trees exceeding this height may be located in the clear vis ion area, provided ec a�i branches below 8 feet are removed. e d.plantixtqs or ures, whit h obstruct vision are located within the clear vision are This requirement has been satisfiedw „. ;ri,G N`C1'StcL �� 17EGxsZoIY ,.. �'3 0007' - k�RANC,�7SCHI 5 5 Snit i r .I I .I I • a, • Chapter ,x.8.150 contains standards for obtaining a required permit for removal of trees having a trunk 6 inches or more in, diameter when measured four feet above the ground. The preliminary site plan does not indicate a need to remove any trees. Zg it becomes necessary to remove any trees, please note that no tree removal shall take place prior to issuance of a Tree Removal permit. There are currently no trees on this site. Section 18.100.01.5(C) requires that the applicant submit a landscaping plan. The applicant has indicated on the site plan the proposed location of 16 trees located along SW Pacific Highway, and westerly portion of the site. Also shown are some portugal laurel, rhododendrons, red maples, and a variety of other plants along the east and l'wes t property lines. Staff is unable to determi!te the accuracy plan.p the proposed landscape . Therefore,, revised of p site plan shall be submitted that shows clarification of proposed landscaping plan. I I I I I r Section 18.114.130(D) (Signs) lists the type of allowable • signs and sign area permitted in the C-G zone. All signs shall conform provisions this code section. All sig sshall be approved through the Si gn Permitprocess by requirements.� � ivis.lon and as administered b the shall comply with vision clearance • A B. PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS: I I I , I I 030( 1 a Streets 18.164.09t� (Sanitary . 164. � � � I I (Storm shall satisfied � I r I Sewer) 18 � ) ") , and 1.164.,1 10 ( Drains) hall be satisfied as specified below: . I P I I I • I I 'I I I I i I I i j.. S`,L'IiEsT S I I I I I I The site is located on Vi ig hwa y adjacent to the P corner I of Fred Meyers, Hi g hway 99 is under the jurisdiction ox r o f the Oregon Stat e �ep t f Transportation. The w as last as a g as station; the eXisting building is still on site. There II are two existing driveway access points 1) the first being a shared ingress/egress with o x . ' I ��°��"� d IMeyer on the southeast' corner of the site and ?, the 99.e Based on the the sp rel �ninarroplans it is Highway o intent to keep and aaintain both acdessypoints . I I I I .I , Transportation u At the time of this report f L r r� the ,III h Depa�'t�t1 e i I had% ''not Submitted,.,.. ' .• '�n ' the t ...of .� .:... t... p ranspor anon s the State will likely be looking for the following deeisi„on the Cca�lment s o t e �.t Based on past g conditions of nm ,developent . I I i I , � II I I I I I I I II No`rXCn of DECISION SDR 93.-0007,. FRA.NCFSCHT PAGE I � . I I I I I , I Ii. I I I � I I I I r I , v , i } v • " w A. Only one access point being kept opened and that being the existing shared access with Fred Meyers; B. Replacement acement of existing curb and sidewalk to meet State standards; and r C. A Permit from the State to perform work within ?' the right-of-way. In conclusion, the applicant should be required to meet the conditions of development as will be requested by the State• SEWER: i 1 2. SANI�I.y ARY SEWER. • .a, There is currently a service stub to the sight• No additional improvements are required. 3. STOMA SEWER: As mentioned above, the site had a service _ . the r*ra.�ce' station located on it x to this 'Y r prior this proposed use the existing building is currently still on site) . After a field visit to the site it was determined that the site slopes tow`a'rds Highway 99 r an.id. there is an existing storm drain line that connects to .. ,' the pub la c line ne located a tPd a n Highway wa Y The s orm in. located in fx h wa y 99 is under the J urnsdlCtaD nd zaxto Hance responsxbilty of tie on State De artnlent cf y I I sed use � t as`t use and the' o is Trax�spo5_tata.an. used on p p P • does l o : a d�ear' W hx� an r a ddi titnal J� rm � st�r will be Create lherefo e r no additional improvements ar e r e .red, The uni f ed S evera a A en c y ha S establishe d and t e C it h as ag reed t o en force (Reso]u.,.t. i. on a n d O rd er No. S u rf ac e ' Water MdC g mend Regul atio ns re u3rin Ethe c on-try lo f on-site water quality facilities o r a es ar -1 su ottheLr coxstruc�iox Se ction 7•02 o f tte � tates t o . °The provi ns of Chs ter 7 shaha� 1� o al 1 a Cti ities whh ele at e n ew or additio Hal iY ery o� s�afa tes. . . . since the intended use wrill not creat e and new, pea:titious s urf apes this a ppl icat ion Is ;not re aired to insta ll a on-s i s u at er . cuali y fadLlit Y or p a fee in�l3eu o f coC�truc tion. 7"�y�y '�y 0 • q�q7 w��l.oURL'r s 1. Notices Notice was ublished in ;the newspapers posted at City Hal3 and. mmailed,`'tc�.a, NOTICE OF OECISXON spR 93-000/ FRANCEsciii' PA0 I: d I ._ XX The applicant and owners XX Owners of record within the required distance W XX !tte affected Neighborhood Planning Organization XX Affected government agencies 2. Final Decision THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON '?j`I F 3 UNLESS Al APPEAL IS FILED. • 3. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Coinraui ity Development Code which provides that a written appeal Must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent Appeal fee schedule and forms are available at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon. I I . The deadline for filing of an ap��ea�. is 3:30 3Q p,m. g-11--13. , 4 II uestion : if you have questions, please call City of Tigard Planning Department, City of Tigard City Hall., 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon. . I I , Phu,."PARED BY: Victor Adonr . DATE Assistant Planner 4 APPROVED B!: Dick Bewersdorlf DA.T;S Senior Planner : I I I I I I R� �y I �^y : � t a Y I b�o1� VE ,.r � OED I��,�:�STON` SDI 9� t7(7t?7- �.�^1c�sCHx I PACE I' I' I I I r I I ' � I I' I, I I I I I , I I : I I � s � y . 4 l� 6 . . , ,4 ■ . .. , 1 . , fr I 1 ; MAPLE:L.EAF 1 . ,L.......1, STREET . 1 . 1 . , 1 :11. 111 L II , —1. arl . 4 II Nil '''' a , t 1 , . . ,... , iiiiiii t , , i _ III 1 I , , a , PINE a . STRE.E I I 1. . a lila .... NI (i) . . 1 . . 11111111 , a III ill ii STREET 1111 j 11. u ■ ■ u) SPRUCE 0) :çii, , . . - a. ... -1--" " ..= '"' 40-N S1: .,ot, , . .. 07 j,,, 4'. •40 1.` ill MI ........ .. I I (.4 1 1 6 4)1 Ai • V.• • 1 — rf:/, s),,,- , ' , imi e,„. 'i1/4)%.\* • all 1 a , . ,. • ii • .. , < . st 'FAPFLE tii ul '0 4 AP [ 4......'. ' 4 S ■ . ■ 0,,.....' ....." ... " 0.1 - Fiir-Jtic t , dclt BAitt 01-4 1 I 1".) a . VA L I_ li"REE T \ . ' ' . I t4V.V 4 • I M 'T yi .,,,,,a,Pa7. ), ( RECD tao7 M ` , - 'i 01P') . P L A.N N C Nom. ----- ._.__ o it . . • September 15, 1997 DEPARTMENT OF MICHAEL ELORRIAGA, ENVIRONMENTAL JME PROPERTIES • 50 MOORING ROAD QUALITY ,I SAN RAFAEL CALIFOR]'NNIA 94901 : '` NORTHWEST REGION Re: Pacific Terrace File No. 34-95-0339 Dear Mr. Elorriaga: The Department of Environmental Quality has completed its review of the information submitted . to date concerning g the underground storage tank(UST) decommissioning and cleanup conducted at 11505 SW Pacific Highway in Tigard, Oregon. The Department has determined that the • cleanup appears'to have met the requirements of Oregon Administrative Rules(OAR) 340-122- , 4 . 205 through 340.122360 and that no further action is required at this time p This determination is a result of our evaluation and judgment based on the regulations and facts as we now understand them, including: • 1 e This property was the site of several service stations between the 1930's and 1978. . However,no evidence of tanks was discovered during the cleanup work conducted on this property. �, 2. Gasoline, dieEel, and waste oil contamination were discovered at this Site Approximately • 382 tons of contaminated soil was removed from this site and taken to TPST Technologies for treatment. An additional cubic yard of contaminated soil was taken to Hillsboro Landfill for disposal / 3, After the soil excavation was complete, contamination remained in the soil and groundwater, After completing additional,investigation.at the site, corrective action plan was submitted pursuant to the Department's "Interim Guidance On Incorporating :i:sk I3 Sites (A•piril ' I ased Corrective 1�ction Fox Petroleum�t,elease ,.' '� 1996}� 4, Tie risk assessment identified benzene as the only contaminant of coricern� ron ��,i�ithb�r Governor exceeded the Tier I 4 None of the other petroleum constituents ex risk-based ,, , levels. The risk assessment identified three pathways of concern ex • -, screening ,4 ern I o for this site: direct ingestion, inhalation, or contact by trench Workers; N`:; , 1, . ` groundwater volatilization to buildings; and groundwater volatilization to � the outd)ors. For the coniinerciallind tria.i,lariduse,the concentrations of -- 202 W Fourth Avenue benzerie +n the soil and groundwater for these pathways met the Tier,I risk�t Suite 400 based scr&ening levels, Portland,OR 97201-4987 I I I (503) 229-5263 Voice I '1T"�'` U3 r I II 7 • 1 I I I Q , , I I I I I , • j h �( I II I t'I I I 1 Michael Elorriaga I } September tember 15 1997 1 P 15, Pagel 2 . II I, . ♦ t I 4 , A limited amount of soil Arid groundwater contamination remains on this site which the 1. Department approves leaving since the contamination does not threaten human health, safety, 1 welfare and the environment. The bulk of the remaining contamination is present under the ° Pacific Highway and 72nd Avenue right-of-ways. The Department's approval to leave f l . " contam,ination is based on the site conditions, including the current industrial/commercial` landuse, described in the corrective action plan as they exist today. The risk assessment indicates that there are no reasonable future likely uses of groundwater at this site, In addition,use of the , contaminated area,other than for roads and right-of--ways is not likely. If site conditions do change or if water wells are ever proposed for this site,the Department must be notified The applicable new or undisclosed facts show that the he Department s determination will not be a 1 able if cleanup does not comply with the referenced rules. The Department's determination also does I not apply to any conditions at the site other than the releases specifically addressed i reports+ ile e releas s,ecific in the � . a copy of.your report must be retained until I Please note'that pursuant to CJAII�..340-122-360(2), pY Y p r «i xl {" (10)years after the y copy of this tee. ),ye e fiz•st transfer of the property, We recommend that a co r information be kept with the permanent facility records. p' • I I � r Your comply with the,regulationslto ensure your facility been adequately k efforts to comp sure that our facili has e,quately , cleaned up have been appreciated. If you have any questions,please feel free to contact me at (503)229u547 , Sincerely,Y, .sz__, Q , II Andree Pollock . I le u UST Cleanup Specialist II j cc: Mr. & �Mrs, o odrow Smith ', I . C/O Lois Portnoy 2427 NW Pinnacle Drive Portland, Oregon n 7 29 8022 I ti I Thomas Gainer aine� . I Century�� e West n" iri eerin g I I I 825 NE Multnomah, Suite.42 i I I Portland Oregon I , on 97232 1 I I I I I I I I, I I I i 6 Q r r • • • • Michael Elorriaga September 15, 1997 • ■ Page 2 • A limited amount of soil and groundwater contamination remains on this site which the b Department approves leaving since the contamination does not threaten human health, safety, { welfare and the environment. The bulk of the remaining contamination'is present under the . Pacific Highway and 72nd Avenue tight-of-ways, The Department's approval to leave 4i • contamination is based on the site conditions,including the current industrial/commercial 1 landuse, described in the corrective action plan as they exist today. The risk assessment indicates that are no reasonable future likely uses of groundwater at this site, In addition,use of the contaminated area, other than for roads and right-of-ways is not likely. If site conditions do • change or if water wells are ever proposed for this site;'the Depar nieiit must be notified. The ' determination will not undisclosed facts a sho show that � '� � � � he Dep�.ents t��.be applicable new or un' 'sc,l � the I � � � �}` , cleanup does not comply with the referenced rules. The Department's -v . site the de tie��zn atto.n also does not apply to any n Y co ndt tt s at the o � han s e x eall addr e ssed in.the reports, rt,, Please note that pursuant to OAR 340-12,2.360(2), a copy of your re p ort must be retained ttalhed tinttl the end.'that ten(l 0)years after the first�transfer of t�,xe;property.�We'reco�m. ' iat a copy of this information be kept with the permanent facility records, Your efforts to comply with the regulations to ensure that,your facility has been adequately cleaned up have been appreciated. If you have any questions,please feel free to contact me at (503) 229-5474 • Sincerelyy, Andree Pollock UST Cleanup Specialist cc: Mr, & Mrs, Woodrow Smith C/O Lois Portnoy 2427 NW Pinnacle Drive l d Port an Cdr 97229-8022 • • Tnoma.s Gainer Century West Engineering j $25 N:,IVStiltna,iiriah f Suite 425 ' ' Port;a.tid, Oregon 97232 ,✓ Ir I I tt! • • r , , J . I • Michael Elorriaga a I , September 15, 1997 Pae3 g • I I I I . r I I , I I I I . I , I , ve Paul ro I I � • AGE •o. 7477 SW Tech Center Drive Portland, Oregon 97223-8025 ,; Henry Schmid • . I ' Oregon Department of Transportation 123 NW Flanders .I Portland,Oregon 97209 • , I I Gary Pippin • I II Tualatin Valley Water District • P.Q. Box 745 I I Beaverton Ore on 97075 y g I I , I I I I r,, Jim Hendry. Community Development City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard 'rigard, Ore g on 97223 Judy Wish iewsll i NW Natural Gas • r , 220 2 nd Avenue ue I I . Portland, Oregon 97209 illiam Archer US West Communications I ' 8021 SW Capitol Hill Road r Portland, Oregon 97219 I II , I • I. I r' av :A,VP I I I I I I I I I I r •• I I I I I • III I .I, I I I I I • • I I I ' :p, I I I I f . I I , I ' I i , I I I I i I I I I r ',44-.4....,,,,,,,,,,. 1r1 ...,W-1 ....wn.rr.,u....r..,,,.....4 ,.r ..IAI.,,∎ ,,, ,,,,,4,„,,,,;N,,..J+,.1 ...w..nu..1..I..1.«. wuwi...-1,. ,...J..«..J.r..4,..•,.M.-.1w,J.-.....,+,,.r+.iH-•-.i:..,s,4..,-r...,r.,...lWr..x ..:w-I.«.-„4+..x1.::,t{. •.I, I..L:.«,-.nh,.,. r•nn 4,r..+sr,l',,,.,,,,i«.,,,,,,.«twJrn..:rm,.l».r..iJ....I.X.,_...:.,v- .J 4 lii 600 Third Street San Francisco, CA 94107 (415)392-831.1' r I I I • I I • I I I • I r • • • I September mbar 2 O 1993 I ,I fi. I � 0, , Mr. Ed Murphy Director of Community Development I I I Cit Y of Tigard g ard 13125 SW 'Hail Blvd Tigard, OR 97223y I I I I Dear Mr. Murphy, 1 r I • In regards `o your letter dated 4ugust 20,, 1993, and our design ` review application SDR 93-0007, I respectfully withdraw the application. I I Yours truly, r ul I I I I Kenneth A. Fran. -schi it I / I I ' I I I I , I � I 111 I I I 1 , I �i I I I r , I 1 cc: Peter rl n lJ Y Fry Mike Foley' I ;, I I I I I I I I I I . .... I I r I ■ ; I I I I • r I I , I 'i r I , I PI I I I , , • I I II I I I I I I I ' I I•. I II I I I I , I� I { .,,,J,,,,,,,,.., r I � I I I I 7v, I. I I , I I J I , I I 1. �Ift�I `� uti j ,, 1 ..�.�rl., -r..__ ..... r, .....I W ..... .......... .. ...>t.—c..a,....,.,...-,..«..Ar-,.wr.,..r..,.J.•u♦.-.__-4...r.....7 r .,u.,r.,,.♦.n r ' �. a �....• i .. .,, w... ».-..F..... 1 ...wHr.n .♦ r a. , .u.n.•...n..n...r.... ....._,.. _I.uu»n,»..n...A.».�.. r.n..M. .�..w+. . . 4.tY..r' 1 . j .w a ' ' ' ' '' 1MEMO1(AND �I , ' '1CITY OF TIGARDOREGO I I I I ' I • r I I ! I �®• I �� rI I ��an ch I I I E + . I I } FROM: :Murphy- I I r I ,. I I I I I. i met with f rancesoh .r peter ;iry and others. , and victor s• 'They .1 Y w l,' robabl thdraw their l�.caf� on X said t y. will Iwa v+ :ea for new a p�. 1, and process quickly.A d a City, and ODOT 'wily eak with .ohs voice. I �: r�1�o� �a.a.d �ha� Y � And I said I would initiate a. process' to discuss the issue with Dick no I. 1 .,. 1 , , , , • . . . , . . . ,. , .. r, sharing access..'�' ��'a�� including, a l�er�l�,�iv $ � �.�. look a� a �o � with pro a ug ®rayce eo�uh� asc theatre acc� ec clri�an 1`. 'lac access to pac hwy o.rl the '''current proposal, with one shared ' ' driveway ith . Ne er ► , alor a dire c a ce rri h I r r g lox e . they' ®I withdraw, vil have o honor e :appeal,: I r I I I I � , , I I I I . I I I t I I I �My •• I I I I I I I ,i , I I r I I I I i I I •. I I I I ♦ I I I . I I I I I I I I , I I , I II I • I ' I I I I I I I I I I I' I I I I I I I r I, I �, I I I I I I I I I . . I I I I rr ...„•,....,,,•:: . ,•' 1 .4+.r, ,r... 1 ..♦,r.:, ., ,., �� .., •' .. , . .. 4.; ' ,' •." . ,, 1 1 1: , , , ...., . I, ■'• ., " alownwoomora.w.......44.444.... 4.44.4.4•444.4.444.4.44.4.44,........,,, ■,.:: '. ' , 4 , , ' ',... , , .. Aiih" , , .: ._ •.. , , . . . , , .. . . ...tiPloppit: , - • 1: August 20, 1993 TY CI OF TIGARD , .. _. . , ,,. . . . :. . , . .. . ,. . ., , . . „ OREGON • ,,-..: ... , ... Ken Franceschi ,N.,,, . : -.„' , , . _ FranOeSchi Properties . „ _ ,,. ' 600 3rd: street San Vrancisdoi CA 94107 , _ . . _ . . : -,: : . RE: SD R '191,-0007 . , . ,.. . . , ,,.. ....,, : bear ?4 ,itr Franceschi: Thank you for meeting with victor and 1 last Vriday., As we _ . . , . . . : y , : diecussed at that meeting* we all seem to be in agreement that the , Director/s decision should be revisited. 1 told you then that 1 •, . . - would review the most appropriate process to we to reopen the . . . decision. . . . . • , . . • X therefore recommend the folloWing:. . • . . .. ,0' • . 1. You ShOUld withdraw your application for site development . , •; , .. review. . . . ..', . ,.. 2. The appeal by bieA Buono on behalf of the Duane company ... ,„ , ,, would then become null and void, since the application would . .::.. be withdrawn. •.• , * 3. You would then file a new application with the City for site . .,..: . development review. ;:....i . ,.. „ • The city Would waive the filihg fee for the hOW application. ..; : ':4 •' ..- 5. Woussue a new Drector's Dedition. . . , I.... . ld i i 6. The new Decision could then be appealed by the applicant,/ by ' the Duahe, Company or by other affected parties,. . ! - , . We would eXpedite the 'review' assuming that the new application .. , . - • , . will be submitted With a full ahalYsis of the ,reasonable alterhatives to having the driveway access onto Pacific Highway. . , ,-, We will work with you or your representatives, Dick tuonot other . . . . adjoining property owhers and °POT,' tO, hopefully come to 411: A . agreemoint on 'access that we oan all accept. If we cannot agree, .1 : then the new Director's Decision can be appealed to the Planning . , ... , : cOmtiesione We would, place the iszue in front Of them at the earliest opportuhity. , • -. ,• ?, , ' . ..,,, . ,. . . „ , . . ,.• .• ,: , ' . . , . . . , , .,.:,. ,, .. : . . . 13125 SW Holt t3lvd; ilgaitl, OR 97228 (503) 089,4171 TOO (504 684,2772 ,' ': ' ' '' . „.. „ . . 1 . . . . . . 1 . . , 1 r• I • , . . . I r 3gut t 2�, 19 3 i ,,.. ri a Fry, AlECP • Planning Consultant I Pago: I 1 . I dbb8� � :�haw � ° P �'�:Q�, �i .��1 intended � �� d 1+ Y1G�,`�r ,� ' ,, ' will now change tx a previous Director°s Decision ,that' limited ' • • ac ess 'onto Pacific Highway, ' but. it is meant to suggest that the pr=vious Decision will be reevaluated on the basis of new , ' ,@ ation the Company 0. or by' others. 3 ' if the • above is agreeable to': you, please send us a letter H' ,.,- c`• withdrawing. the ..application Ia ' the Meanwhile, bsed assumption that, you' are going to'withdraw tie application, we did • ,' ' 'not 'schedule ,,the' appeal hearing before the Planning 'Coriission for ' August 3O �® , If you have ,l any questions or comments g please do not' hes3r'taeo� call ro •+; •, sp�,�� " 1 ,, ti i i. :'1'111'.:.,'1.'1:1 '11.:'''' .-11' 1::::', 1H 1':,':'''' 11:.'11.'11.11.1'1' .:11.'.1.'„,'''111' 11 '': ''' '1 H '''''''''' 1 H 1 1 ' '-''' ' ' 111' 11' '1 1:1:1:' I.x,11 ur 1y�, 1D rerzto . ,oaf �Community� Development fb D p y I iI ob Doran, Oboe Dick' Bewersdorff , , Randy o4le I I l I I a 4hande►e 1 rat' I I r I i I v I I �I I , I . . . , ,• r • .. 1 • � ,I,,• I , . N �i `i' 1I i I ' 4' I • , I I I , ' ' x _ _ .....A.n,wo..,,��. .Iw+4, .,�.a...A,..k,..,,.,.1..,.h4,:.,r....e....,1...�.. ..G....A._. .. ,.... ..,ti�.....«» ...,.Ji, .,..-,r..,'1.+n..1'.i ..... ....u.r •,�.I. .,1... ..F,......-,.4...n,: µ.�..J...w-u....4.«4a......,.,.-•.,I rv+.,rwYlm=�.,.....r,r....,,.Ik..,...,......,u-V„ ...rr�.n..,.r k,...,.. ...4...,H.nr.a�. r , I i 1 • MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON II . . I I „ ;02 TO: Ed Murphy r Community Development D Dick Bewersdorff, Senior Planner FROM: Cathy Wheatley, City Recorder DATE: August 2, 1993 SUBJECT Appeal of Director's Decision - Site Development Review SDR 93-0007; Fr'anseschi - Owner/Applicant Dick attached is the appeal received from Ric ar� d B. Buono, Vice President of the Duane Company ^e e ence e abo to i e De re oilmen Review Director's Decision. Duane Company as i ec as. a recipient of the Director's Decision and because of t�75 appear to me to be entitled to Notice and, thus, have standing to appeal the decision. The appellant should also be apprised of the planning Coission hearing date as soon as possible. I I Thanks. 1, I I I I I Il I I I � ii I ` I I ' I � I I I I I I , I , I I I x u � . , ., . I• LAND USE DECISION APPEHk. FILING FORM N ` The City of Tigard supports the citizen's right to raagtlll w � participate in local government. Tigard`s Land Use (l��rlpl►g11;.�t Code therefore sets out specific requirements for ,:,, '}''!'.,,. Farling appeals on certain land use decisions. OF TIGARD) ,,` The folloWing form has been developed to assist you in filing an appeal of a land use decision in proper OREGON form. To determine what filing fees will be required or to answer any questions you have regarding the k' appeal process, please contact the Planning Division or the City Recorder at 639-4171. ►r. 1. APPLICATION BEING APPEALED: SDR-Y3-0007 FRANCESCHI, OWNER/APPLICANT 2. HOPI DC YOU QUALIFY AS A PARTY: DUANE COMPANY IS THE OWNER 'OF THE ADJOINING PROPERTY WHICH IS LEASED TO FRED MEYER, INC. 3. SPECIFIC GROUNDS FOR APPEAL OR REVIEW: PLEASE SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A TO APPEAL. • , nu . • 4, SCHEDULED DATE DECISION IS TO BE FINAL! AUGUST 11, 1993 5, DATE NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION WAS GIVEN: JULY 23 1993 I I� y SIGNATURE(S): I ANE COMP_ NY 0/Alk :) fir -- ..W B Y� I r '� A RDP. :UONO, VICE PRESIDENT R40000C-aoE 000'oo o-f4 f oo 4-x4YHt' 4000-��-i€-i�-34-0000i-x-x4(4t-4-k4i-H4(4( 4x4ofx-io boot-r(x,rt x*g FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ' R eive,d By: t he"( Date: ' 4' / Time t• 'sa5 Sire,, ., . Approved As To Form By: A .. i Date l I Ti�me:' l c" e^ r Denied As To E M B Date: Timo: , dr Receipt Flo, . - 'E5Si Amount: I 13125 SW Haft Blvd.,Pa Box 23397,Tigard,Oregon 9722 t/y,II) -4171--� e I I tr I I I I I EXHIBIT A TO APPEAL OF SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW - SDR93-0007 The Applicant filed an Application for Site Development Review showing two access points, one being a direct access to Pacific • Highway (Highway 99) and the second being a shared access with Appellant at the southeasterly corner of Applicant's property. The Amended Notice of Decision for the subject Site Development Review gives the following as an approval condition: "2. A revised site plan shall be submitted for approval , through the city engineer, which address(es) the location of the access point and minimizes the traffic conflicts. In addition, no direct access onto Pacific Highway shall be e permitted." The City of Tigard's Condition of Approval No. 2 denied the access point to Pacific Highway and requires the Applicant to revise its site development plan to show the shared access configured to , minimize traffic conflicts. The condition invites either . •.- :. : confirmation of the location of th shared ois,n)tec7r-FyrVii°a.'taIril of th shared access point. The condition does access point , . be acceptable. COMMENTS BY APPELLANT IN SUPPORT OF APPEAL 1. No time limit is given for re-submission of the site plan. The Applicant could submit the revised site plan after the end of the appeal period thereby denying parties with standing to appeal the information needed on which to base an appeal . The City of Tigard's ' Condition also states that the revised site plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer who is pot given authority to approve Site Development Reviews by the Tigard Community Development Code. . . 2. Section 18,120.120 of the Tigard Community Development Code states that the proposed site development plan (required for Site Development Review by Section 18.120,090.C. and by Section 18.120.120) must show the location and dimensions of entrances and exits on the site Since Condition of Approval No 2 imposed by the City of Tigard denied the entrance/exit oh Pacific Highway and stated that the revised site plan must address the location of the shared • access point, it is clear that the site development plan purported to be approved by the Amended Notice of Decision does not comply with the provisions of Section 18.120.120 of the Tigard Community Development Code as the location and dimensions of the entrances and exits are not shown on the approved site development plan. ■ • ,, ('u.., Exhibit A .. Page 2 F y: 3. If the Applicant's site is to be served only by the access point •, shared by Appellant, substantial traffic accessing both the Fred Meyer store, the Les Schwab facility and other shops as well as the Y Applicant's i cantl's?5,000 square foot commercial/retai'l facility will have to be accommodated through this shared access point. Applicant is the beneficiary of a triangular easement on. Appellant's property! however, that easement only provides -access to the most southerly twenty-five -'..: feet of Applicant's easterly property line. Thils easement area is ' .' '' wholly insufficient to handle ingress and egress to the combination r r of Applicant's site and Appellant's site. Using the easement area as Applicant's principal ingress point could cause substantial stacking . for both left turning and right turning traffic movements from Pacific Highway into Applicant's site. Stacking could severely hamper the operation of Pacific Highway at this location. The most logical access point for Applicant's property is the access point Applicant proposed on Pacific Highway in the site development plan submitted or at a point accessing Pacific Highway somewhat further down site to the southwest from the access point shown in the site development plan. The joint access presently in effect to Applicant°s site using the existing easement across Appellant's property should be discontinued • • so as to properly separate traffic attempting to gain ingress to and egress from each site. Such a provision would create less impact to traffic on Pacific Highway than the concept requested by the City of ,, .r Tigard through Condition No 2 of the Amended Notice of Decision. At most, the shared access point should be a secondary point rather - than a n'rimary point of ingress and egress to Applicant's property. t,b 4. Section 18.120.180.A. of the Tigard Community Development Code A provides that the director shall make a finding with respect to Chapter 18.108 (Access, Egress and Circulation) when approving with conditions or denying an Application for Site Development p Review. The Amended Notice of Decision had one finding. p o ment ; respect' to Y r, Section 18.108.000. That finding was that the access way is shown to provide the required twenty four foot pavement width for a two-way , . rovide t fo " I. commercial access way. n No. 2 for Condition ,. p'.. ° Such a finding is invalid i n as much as C f ' approval � stated that the site plan must be re-submitted showing the shared , ` access point revisited and the direct access to Pacific Highway ' deleted. Since neither access as shown on the si te development plan was approved, ho access is shown on the plan and therefore it cannot be concluded that the site plan provides the required twenty-four i , foot pavement width for p .. � two-way access way. . r a two way comr�ierC�a1 ac , t. n i i a I � a y d4 U i I II .4 • • • Exhibit A Page 3 5. The Section 1$.108.068 of the Tigard C o mm unit y Development t Code speaks to referring applications for permits to the Planning Commission for review if the proposed access causes or increases hazardous traffic conditions. Appellant submits that if access is :; limited to the existing easement at the joint access point, hazardous, traffic conditions will be caused or increased and, therefore, the Application should be referred to the Planning Commission for • decision. • • • • } • • • e ' 1 I � r• II • r . CITY OF TIGARD ,. AMENDED Na �XCE OF I SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR. 93-0007 FRANCESCHI - OWNER / APPLICANT { \ . APPLICATION: A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 5,000 square foot commercial retail building. Zoning: C-G (General Commercial) Location: 11595 .SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 151 36DB, tax lot ,200) . SECTION I - DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director's designee for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted inn. Section II, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, THE STAFF CONTACT SHALL BE CHRIS TAVrES OF THE ENGINEERING D E PAR 1 L r 1. A revised site plan shall be sub mitted for a pproval which , indicates the provision of the following: One disabled person parking space, and one bicycle parking space. lk . revised landscaping plan which shows the provision of �a r m 15% • g required by code.' - � � � nut 15� landscaping as ��:ec�u�� cc►de. , �Tne� revised � � ��' plan shall include the total square footage devoted for . . landscaping. STAFF CONTACT: Victor Adonri e Planning Department. 2 A revised site plan shall be submitted for approval, through ,7 the City Engineer, which address the location of the access, ,, • point and minimizes the traffic conflicts. In addition, no direct access onto Pacific Highway shall be permitted. 3 A joint use and maintenance agreement shall be executed and recorded for all common driveways o The agreement shall be e a o referenced can and become �t �reviewed ��the Engineering er:�.xi .. bec,o�t rce�. shall be nevi w g Deeds. The agreement �' �' Department pror to recording. 4. The app lacant shall obtain o btain a permit from the e St ate of Oregon • ' Highway Division, to perforat work within the ri ght «f��a� o f , Highway 99. A, copy of the permit shall be pro• idea to • he City Engineering Department. � .;, 5. The applicant shall m..,..eet th e reqalacments of the Oregon Department of Transportation ) as it related to the frontage of the site and the State' right-of-way.. NOTICO OF DSCL 3IOH SOR 93--o007 k'TZAt+cEscHI PA 1i. • u' I n'N t • . IN ,ADDI'T?ON THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE; SECTION TO.12 0.06 0 BONDING AND f ASSURANCES and SECTION 18.164 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT BE THE OR STANDARDS. ' COPIES I�lAY`, ' BE OBTAINED THROUGH ° '' I :PLANNING O ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS • I I VALID a' THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF, EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN NONTHS OF THE ; DATE OF THE FINAL DECISION. i' • SECTION II. _FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Background: I , •. T he subject s ite is currently develo ped with an existin g gas e, station building which is proposed to be demolished. No subsequent land use applications have been filed with the ?' , City for this site. 2. Vicinity Information: , I � The, subject site is located on SW Pacific Highway adjacent to the southwest corner of Fred levers.Shopping Center. The ; surrounding properties are zoned 'C-G (General Commercial) , , . and are substantially developed. 3. Site Infaritiatian and ra P osal Description: • The subject parcel is approximately 0.35 acres in Size and was last used as a gas station. The existing building 'is , still 'on site, and is proposed to be demolished. Access to the site is available from SW Pacific Highway. The I applicant proposes to construct a 5,000 square, foot commercial retail building. The applicant have submitted a traffic study after we completed our comments. The applicants g. implied, tS en .l.1Cle�':r � through the traffic study, that if the access on Pacific Highway Were closed, there i otzi,d be traffic conflicts thereby requiring both access points,. While we do not disagree with this statement, it is also our opinion that with the current access locations there are also the e C n e o c rns with traffic conf liets We have reviewed situation and feed there " are alternatives which Could alleviate the traffic conflicts One alternative is to change the location of the building and move the east a c ce ss point as f ar north a s poss i hle. ' NKT10E OF DECISION SDR 91-0007 F ICE5CHI PAGE 2 I I I�I • I I • I , n , • 'ills ' tt . II r I { i 1 ll { • I . I I Therefore the applicant should be required uired to provided a I I revised site plan which addresses the access issue. • • • • 4 Agency and NPO Comments I I • I �he City of Tigard Building Division reviewed eved t his proposal and has offered the following comments: . I I I P • Catch� basins are to �be approved by the City's Plumbing g Inspector. • The Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue #1 has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: Fire hydrants are required within 250 feet of all . portions of the structure measured around the outside I. and along access roadway. Plans shall be submitted to j the Fire District for review and approval. ' I The State of Oregon Highway Division has reviewed this ' proposal and has offered the following comments 0 A joint use access w ll only be permitted on the east end of site: , » o Curbs and sidewalks to be constructed to current standards. o Applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from Oregon' Department of Transportation for access and other work within the right-cif-�lar. The 1 Neighborhood Planning Organization #8 has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: ' The handicap parking site as not van accessible. .. •.I Tualatin Valley Water Via. tric o, General Telephone and • . , El ectrands, Tigard Pub lic Wo rcs r School District #2 3(3) Northwest Natural Gap Portland rteral . • have reviewed i ec this application I and II have offered no comments or objections. .., SECTION ANALYSIS. AND CONCLUSION `/iy!N n • A. CCMPLlFNCC WZTA COMMUN ITY.. ' 3E �O� �ENC J �� T �M / • The applicant indicated that the proposed ne ant ha�� as w use of it Ph use site This lurse is this site is for general Retail Sales. No'rIct Or DNCISION 8DR 93--0001 rRANC,8SCHr PACE 3, I I • I • I I j I I a I I II • I , I I I • I I YY ,s, classified in Code Section 18.42 ([ Se Classifications) as General Retail Sales. Code Section 18.62.030 allows General Retail Sales as a permitted use in the General Commercial zone. , Section 18.062.050 states that there is no minimum lot area for parcels in the C-G zoning district. The average minimum lot width shall be 50 feet. This site is approximately 15,417 square feet in size with an average minim= lot width of approximately 180 feet. Developments wiO,,, :n the C-G zoning district are required to provide a minimum of 15% . landscaping on the site. Of the approximately 15,417 square foot site, the applicant has proposed to retain approximately 10;417 square feet. of existing land for landscaping and other improvements. Applicant. has not indicated the actual square footage devoted for landscaping. Therefore, a revised preliminary landscaping plan shall be „. provided which shows the provision of a minimum 15% landscaping as required by the C-G ming district. The • site plan shall, also include the sq'1 y footage'I devoted for '" V landscaping. Section 18.62.050 requires specific setbacks for developed sites in the C-G zone which abut residential zoning districts. Since this parcel is surrounded on all sides ,b'' p by other properties which are also C-G, no building setbacks are required. Section 18e106e030 ) (Minimum Off-Street Parking Requirements -- General Retail Sales) requires one parking space for each 400 square feet of gross floor areas The Commercial retail building is approximately 5,000 square feet. Commercial, retail building of, this size, require the provision of a minimum of thirteen (13) parking.spades. The site plan indicates that thirteen (13) parking spaces will . be provided. Therefore, the preliminary site plan meets the number of parking spaces required and therefore satisfies 4 this Code requirement The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA.) , which became' of fectiv • .� eon January 1 to 25 parking ac are disabled person ary 26„. �.9��r requires an abled pc��son parking spaces if p, g spaces re provided. The p rop s site plan does not show a provision for one e ppoed person parking s tee. Therefore, a revised site plan shall be submitted which provides for one disabled person parking' space. I The preliminary site plan indicates that one driveway near the southeast portion of l the site is to pro vide access to 13 3 parking spaces. The preliminary site plan n al so indicates provision of another divewa at the southwest corner of the ritcaTxc8 OF iagcrSi o� ��p 93-0007 -- i��iAivcESc�� P�� 4 I a x I site. Therefore, the requirements for Code Section 18.108.080 which states that commercial development with 99 m F or less required parking spaces provide a minimum access width of 30 feet and a minimum p avement width of 24 feet. This code requirement has been satisfied. • I I C ode Section 18. 106.020' � ) requires one bicycle c le parking • space for each 15 vehicle ar kin 9 spaces es in any development. Since 1 3 parki ng spaces are to be provided I on this site, one bicycle parking space is required for this development. Therefore, the site plan shall be revised to show a minimum of one bicycle parking space. As per Section t�.on 18.108 a 08a A the accesswaa is shown on the p .�.. y wnrz� h preliminary site plan to provide the required 24 foot pavement width) for a two-way commercial accessway. Code. Section 18.108.050(A) requires that a walkway shall extend from the main ground floor entrance of all commercial developments to the street which provides the required access and egress. The proposed site plan indicates the provision of such a pedestrian access. Therefore, this code requirement has been satisfied. Section 18. 100.030 (Street Trees) states that' all , deve ll opment projects fronting on a street more th an , 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with the standards in Section 18.100.035.. This site fronts on SW Pacific Highway for approximately 170 feet. Therefore, street° trees are required. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large) . The 1 • .• preliminary site s l . pYin indicates p dr o s I o approximately four (4) street tre es to be planted the site. Therefore. this code requirement has been satisfied. Section• 1_8 w l. og (Visual Clearance Are requires that t a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all • property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the • clear of P private drive y., A .. vision area s public street and a ri intersection f a hidle hedge, fence, wall structure,ll contain n� uctur e anent obtructi e orp .. - .. , car • ex�a 'on ept � occasional utility p r tree) 3 feet fo hei r measured fro the top of the exceeding or � pole o where �n g . ::curb, or .. no curb 'exists) r •be� located in h street center line ride. gees exceeding this o � e ex+� �.s ' height. atom e s Lace center � vision area provided al rands below 8 feet are removed. in No lant ih s r e " which obstruct vision are located 4 within the clear viSion This reluiremert has been I , satisfied. NoTtCE OF DEC sroN spirt 93-0007 -- FRANcE8cHI PAGE 5 • I I I I I I I III' I I i I I I I i I I • i '4k _. Chapter 18.150 contains standards f or obtaining inin g a required ired permit for removal of trees having a trunk 6 inches or more in diameter when measured four feet above the ground. The preliminary site plan does not indicate a need to remove any trees. If it becomes necessary to remove any trees, please note that no tree removal shall take place prior t to issuance • There are no trees on permit. T of Tree Removal erm currently this site. Section 18.100015 � requires that the e applicant nt s u submit a landscaping plan. The applicant has indicated on the site a plan the proposed locatiOn of 16 trees located along SW Pacific Highway, and westerly portion of the site. Also shown are some portugal' laurel, rhododendrons, red maples, and a variety of other plants along the east and west a, is unable to determine the accuracy lines. Staff i Y of the proposed landscape plan.' Therefore, a revised site . plan shall be submitted that shows clarification of proposed �. landscaping plan. the type of allowable e ] .130 D (Signs) lists Section. 8 1P signs and s.,: fn area permitted in the C-G zone. All signs , shall Conforms to the provisions listed in this code section. All signs shall be approved. through 'thy Sign Permit process as administered by the Planning Division and shall comply with vision clearance requrrement.z� X CONCERNS:a B. a� YzT c C Sections 18.16�.�3 0 a (Streets) , 18.� ,4.090 (Sanitary y Sewer) / and 18.164.100 (Storm Drains) shall be satisfied as r specified below: 1. STREETS: The site is located o Highway y 99 adjacent to the southwest corner of Fred Meyers. hway 99 is under the jurisdiction . Department ` uri�sdiction Highway the Oregon P 5t�a.tioof. Transportation. � " was qtr ed:State�a gas rtm�nt xi t�:rA bui)din��.�.s still on site. There are two existing driveway access points 1) the first being a shared ingress/egress with Fred ]N�e.�...er on the southeast site�. ' � � the � and 2)�� corner of the �� • , other being ado n g the f..rontage of the property and Highway 99» based on the a pplicants P relimina. plans, it is their intent tsr t t0 keep maintain both access points. report rt the Department of Transportation At the time �f ��h�:a�� i P nt not. riaitted. domments� to the City.. : t e following n past had �no �� .sub � Based o decisions the State will likely be looking for h llowing Conditions of deVe).opment NoTIGS OF D5c cSIOI ' SAa 95-0007 - F GDSGH PAG5 6 fob• A 1 7' { • • A. n� one O y' access s point being kept opened, and that being the existing shared access with Fred Meyers; B Replacement of existing curb and sidewalk to meet eat State standards; and O. A Permit from the State to perform work within P the right--of-ways I I In cone l us a.vn• the applicant should ld be required to meet the conditions of development as will be requested by the State. 2. SANITARY SEWER. 4' ' , There is currently a service stub to the sight. No additional ,improvements are required. 3. STORK. SEWER: h` f As mentioned above, the site had a service station located on it prior to this proposed use (the existing building is ' currently still on site) After a field visit to the site it was determined that the site slopes towards Highway 99 'I that connects to and l�there is an 'existing storm, drain line, the public line located in Highway 99. The storm line located Highway o cated �.n ighwayl 99 is under the jurisdiction and , I maintenance responsibility of the Oreg on State Department of Transportation. Based on past use and the proposed use it does not appear that any additional storm water runoff will • be created, Therefore no additional improvements>ti�ents are p rec,�u.ired.e I I I The Unified Sewerage Agency has established ie and nd t- he City y has . agreed to (Resolution Order No. 9147) Surface Water Management Regulations requiring the con$truction of on-site water quality facilities or fees in-lieu of their construction. Section 7.02 , 2 a� the RHO states that: `2'he !� ' , provisions of shalla 1, to al create�new or additional Chapter 7�I apply surfaces 1 acti�'itaes which . intended use will n t create aru ew imperviou surfaces tee " • Since �' impervious th'' application is not required to install a on-s .te water quality facility or pay a fee in-lieu of construc do n. I i Min I I , I SECTION IV• P Uk�E I R ED I . 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to , I NOTICE oV DECxSlotT spit 93-0007 - 'F'il.AIV`cESCHt PAGE 7 I �' I f I I i r r w i I ^ a _,.aaw .—...+. .. ,r.m... , 1.w. xa_,. ,.i. ,.r, .1...... .rr r,-, A.. re... .,.. r. .-..i ,.. , .f.a...._.,_.u.....e In...fan... a,i I ..,ax..,..:'A.N 4..I.LL�In r. .✓.,n , OJ XX The applicant and owners , XX Owners of record within the required distance XX The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization XX Affected government agencies 2. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON 1E11-13 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 3. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this I decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A.) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. Appeal fee schedule and foams are available at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon. The deadline for 'filing of an appeal is 3:30 p.m. g--11'- 3. 4. Questions: If you have questions, �please call City of Tigard Planning Department, City of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon. • I I t , PREPARED BY: victor Adonri DATE Assistant Planner r I I APPROVED BY: Dick Bewersd+arf f DATE Senior 'Planner I i I I ra . I NOTICE 010 J10 3ECxSION SDR 93 Ona 1- - k"RANCE SCHT PACE I r , 8 • f I I I I r I I I I, a • liii . r I 1 1 , f 11AA6'�El•EAF S i �� i, . . , ill '1111 i• F- 111,111 1 _ pp Ell x I •r 1 OS . AJ . r 1 • • � , 1 . 1 __,:il, . ...!V' I1 !!T { I 11111111 1E1 iiimiiii I I I � E Y e • iSTRE iL ,, en SPRUCE ,.... .,..,: • ,, ,1 , ......— 1 I w I I r I 1 • 1 .,,.. .a 'kt-I I rr 1}c' 1 .r I I r 1 lis 1 I I------1 1 ,I � I jilil ; I- mil • 11 • immant ..amain al i 1 1, IN il NI 1 , ' . ' AEI . 11111_, • . 1 . , . 1 , . 1 , I r 1 •t )FAFFLE ST., � 1 I • 'I I I I I 1 1 ,4 I •� I I / I . I _ I I�, 0 r I L • IY W��y I yr 1 ke.SPfI I 1 y l PNJ414 k t t ROADWAY " i I 1 11 1 1 4 B AYLOR f i ,.,ii/1._.:* ill 1 r I I r i I aU VA 1 l r I I I nom, I I , . • ., ,......,r .,,.,..,....,,..*c4,,.wl_...4,,. r.. .»._.r, ,._ kr,..,...,.4 ti,.„.,..'.:,.,..,,.�,,,,.,,. .,,,,.M...._,,. ...... .......r,„ ._..„ ....,.,..... :+:. „„_, ..r,.,,.,�. .. . .. ,..r a �.r I I J • AFFIDAVIT OF HAILING I I I I I SPATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) dd. City of Tigard jo , being first, duly dworn/affiriu, on oath and (Please print)a depose �.n s a w F • That T. am a 6AA trnLZ2 ( e4 'St 4IJ for l'., I � The City of Tigard, Oragon. ' I.• ' ' That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: n.._.;..,�� That I served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: ✓ City of Tigard Planning Director • Tigard, Planning Gommi®aion I ,-'Tigard HEHearings Officer Tigard Ci1y Counci] c � i�, is atta fed' �la�3c..d Exhibit, A wad 1.Mail { ns at the a • P� �. ce each of Decision)� I l,�, A copy (Public H�a�.in Not fiic►tice attached lx t marked e d.. it. ea'� named a day of dress sh�wrY15on �f the i x�'ib 191' w t bulletin boa=d on the I ,, da as af hereto ttached, �va1ol�e .on ah^nc appropriate tell k �r said notice NOTICE OF ICE I ON r ._r in the united States Mail, on the _.. d y of , , �:3 % ,, . postage prepaid. ' ,. I I II' r I I I Prepared oi Ce I • rl^, I I I r I I it Sn , Dribs. and orn/af f iri2t to Me on tho day,ref o r,.. �!'• i rl • r I I I I I rt r Y r V V. It PUBLIC 0,.t OREGON r i ° i, ,'I?�I I I3y Commission Lxpares t 4 72L,.._ • • . a I , d I lt, I I , I I • I I ' I I i I kt I I f I f I � is�,, II I r I {P r h I I I I • 1- N r , r 1i I r . r( I . I • CITY TIGARD AMENDED NOTICE OF DECISION s. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 93-0007 FRANCESCHI - OWNER / APPLICANT I I , APPLICATION: A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 5,000 square foot commercial retail building. Zoning: C-G (General Commercial) Location: 11595 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S1 36DB, tax lot 200) . SECTION I - DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director's designee for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above request, subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on noted in Section II. �conc 1.0 which the e decision ion is based, are n taon I I THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, THE STAFF CONTACT CHRIS . SHALL, �BE DAVIES'� OF THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT.I� � � � �I � . 1. revised site plan l shall be submitted for approval which indicates the provision of the following: One disabled person parking space, and one bicycle parking spade. A revised, landscaping plan which shows the provision of a minimum i 15% landscaping as required by code. The revised p lan ; hall inc lu de the total square footage devoted for r a landscaping. STAFF CO N TACT: Victor Adonri, Planning I I Department.' r I • ' I 2.I' I A revised site plan shall be subMattel d for approval,proval,I through rongh the City Engineer, which address t he location of the access minimizes t p. . I �o�� PaGif� Highway s�.a ts.� �.� . o.�.nt� and hP traffic cony �n dd�.tion, �no direct access ont '�c ll be permitted. 3, A joint� use and maintenance agreement .hall be executed and. i recorded for all common driveways. The agreement shall red dri ,� be I �' referenced on and become part of all applicable parcel d � p I � � � Deeds. .. The agreement shall be reviewed by the Engineering Department prior to recording. I, 1 The I r, 4.I I t a licant chall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon n.,.ig..•h way D •ives ao n� to perform r n work within hin the right-of Tway I Hig hwa y 99. A of th e �erits hail be provided to the City Engineering Department. f I I 54 Th e a Pi p�i ca nt shall meet the re �1r s � the Oregon n Department of Transportation as it relates to fro ntage of the site and the State right-of-way. I I I I I ; I I t1CTI IOg O� bEcTsroN CDR 93 -O0O7 IPRANtS SCktt PAGE 1 I ., I �I I , li I I I I I I II i I I I I I I .. I ,r 1 1, 57 , 1 ~ r r ,, o n. o 1 I I , '... `sJG, i , '" IN ADDITION THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE 'FOLLOWING SECTIONS I : `OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT' CODE; SECTION 18.120.060 BONDING AND `; •' ASSURANCES and SECTION 18'.164 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT 1: . STANDARDS. COPIES ' MAY BE OBTAINED THROUGH THE , PLANNING OR ' :ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS e' ' '' I • • , THIS APPROVAL IS' VALID I F EXERCYSE i THIN EIGHTEEN HTEEN MONTHS OP , • DATE OF THE ,FINAL DE C IC S I ON. S ' I ' SECTION ECTION I I :rINDING&I Or `FACT : ; I 1. Background: : ,, �t as , tl develo ecI w,�ith an e��,s�in � �� The sub ect site a.s Currently�� p existing g station 'building 'which is l'proposed to be demolished. '„ No, . ' subsequent land use ,applications :have been filed with the 4 it for, th.is site. i II , C I I I y I ry• e Vicinity�,.n�,�� I of orzna tx.en. �G . , I o �:��ac. � �. hw a ad ac e?in {J s� is orated n SW �.he s�.b ec �,1 � �' � , Ou'�hwe�'�� Gorller Of F reC�.I:Me ��' .,5�nq) �.�fl Center. The 1 S I h pp � � , u .� .rcial e e rat Coar�me o ed G n �. : : �surrounding: properties �,a�e z rn � C��I C�� :� � r :� �, , : and' are substantially'' developed. r, ' I • I 3 I. Site Info. ati.on and Poposai Descriptican. � a.5 a r oaantatel 0 .35 acres. Iin ''size and. a G , l Z�1e s1.� b eq.t par col zed as a gas' station he ex: ''1',,'. ' • � � �� was , l�as . � ��i�t�in� k��xildina� 'is � I stills on, site,, 'and is� proposed to be demolished.' Access ,to t a Site is available • I � , ' � � � � �' � from SW pacific Highway.: � ' ' ' H '.'. �� • . ' ' The applicant I�propoges to constr�.et a 5'400 s&juare foot � - � . comrnerci.al, retail. buildinc ' ' ' i The applicant ant have Su bmi t t d a,� traffx c stuff Y after we , � rem�let ed o ur con� ��ts. The ap�p l;cants enganeer gym p1 ae d ' I , , through shd Yx ghat' i access ox Pa cifxc � ' . were cla se 4 hthet6 would: be traffic conflicts thereby, requiring g 'both aaccess po While we do not wi h „a tem it is l in 'that w the ,, also. �on t disagree y'rh '� l� statement �. out' o I. � � �. �x�r'e�t ac' � ��e aye' I 1 s o ,. � , � � i��' the� c ces S locatioan� they concerns with traffic conflicts w I We have reviewed the situation' and feel, there are I alterna :ves which'' could'' alle�ia to the traf fic 'conflicts 0 I One ternatie is to Change th e location of the , and, move, the east acces point as ar north as possib I : ��- ��I PAGE 2 � as � �o�� r,�N �s ci A OP ��ECxs�r�N �� ,�I�� 7�� k t7 xc;F1 I� y : HI I • I • I I I • , I I I I I I ry I I Therefore, the applicant should be required to provided a revised site plan, which l addresses the access issue. I I I I I r I I I I 4. Comments P o.�. enc and NPO The Cit y Tigard Building Division has reviewed this I of Tz r g P ro P osal and has offered the following g comments: Catch basins are to be approved by the City's Plumbing ing Inspector. . yr r w I I The T�alatan V al le y Fire & Rescue scue #1 has reviewed d this ,. proposal and has offered the following comments: } Fire hydrants are required within 250 feet of all . I � g'uired I I portions of the , structure measured around the outside I I I ! and• along access ;roadway. IPlan.s shall be, submitted to I I the Fire District for review and approval. The State of Oregon Highway hwa y I � vis io n has reviewed ewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: _, ' e permitted on the east . � o A ',taint use access will only ,b P en d of site.d 1 I I I I s and sidewalks be l constructed to current 1 o Curbs to standards. • r I I I o Applicant�c ant s ha l l obtain n the necessary cessa permits from ' 1 Oregon' Department of Transportation for access and r� other work within the right-of-swage ) I I The Neighborhood Planning Organization #8 has reviewed this I 1 .: proposal and has offered the following comments: . I The handicap parking site notvan' aocessible. II I I I i I . I u a a � n'� a le Water District,�i C t General eral T ele h on e and I Electronics, �i and Publid School 2 3 -J� Nor thwest Natural Gag, � Portland general ener al Fled cit have reviewed this application an d ha ve offe red no comments or objections, F r I • rl .I Ii SECTION III. Ai�Y Y AND CONCLUSION I r r I I I I I I I I I COMPLIANCE WIT [ COMMUNITY�.� DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: i II t ted that the proposed new use• I The applicant has indicated P �! of ' I this site is. for General Retail 8aies a This use is I ' NoWII CE I CE D8O SIO I SDR r I 9 OI O0/ PAANCEScwx I : r I i I I I I I I i I r � 1 i f I I r I' I r I r !.. I r \ I , II I I I I I I I I I I I I Ii I I r, I I I r ..r. r I r, I I ,.•..r..,4 M.. e.,., AJ ...+,i.««..Ar.a..r.,r..» I.,r,.,«'I,.r. ,r....I.. ...1....«. e......, r. a -,. r r...,......._.4,.',...» r r.......r..,l.u, .....a...v r....r«x+.,n..l.,. ,--.«r.J..r....r r , , ......vM ... rirr.,r y J[Lf I t a r J r I ".Ytr • ■ w classified in Code Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as General Retail Sales. Code Section 18.62 .030 allows General !' Retail Sales as a permitted use in the General Commercial . o e 4 z n I I I . r I Section 18. 2 . t 0 6 0 a 0 states that there is no minimum lot S h �. um t area I I for parcels in the C-G zoning district. The average minimum lot! width shall be 50 feet. This site is approximately 15,417 square feet in size with an average minimum lot width of approximately 180 feet. Developments within the C-G zoning district are required'll to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping on the site. Of the approximately 15,417 square foot site, the applicant h a s proposed to retain n approximately 10,417 1 0 417 s q ua a feet of existing an g land for landscaping and other improvements. A pp licant has not, indicated the actual square footage devoted for landscaping.g Y landscaping p Therefore, a revised reliminar �andsca in plan shall be I ' �' provided which shows the provision of a minimum 15% landscaping as required) by the C-G zoning district. The ` P site plan shall also include the square footage devoted for landscaping. I I I I I I I' I Section 1 2. 8 � 050 requires specific setbacks s f r developed sites in the C-G zone which abut residential zoning i districts Since this parcel is surrounded on all sides by other properties which are also C-.G,' no building l setbacks are :required. I 4 I I I (Minimum Off-Street Parking I Section 18. 106 .010.01)411.. . Min" , f' Requirements - General Retail Sales) requires one parking space for each. . O square feet of g toss floor area. Commerci al retail is approximately 5,000 square feet. Commercial retail building of this size require the R; provision of a minimum of thirteen (13) parking spaces The site plan indicates that thirteen (13) parking spaces will ' be provided. Therefore, the preliminary site plan meets the of 'parking spades required and therefore satisfies number satisfies this Code requirement. The Americans, r; • • . with Disabilities Act (ADA) , which became. effective on January 26, 1992, requires one disabled person parking. if 1 to 25 parking are provided. The proposed Site plan does not show a pro vision f or one , disabled person parking space. Therefore, a revised I I site plan shall be submitted which provides for one disabled person parking spaces I The. p re x site plan the e driveway near the southeast t portatn the s its i s to p rovide access to 1 3 iI i parking spaces, p ry` site plan, also indicates vision of another the southwest Why preliminary aa�i� ' Ipra her dri�rewaYl�� Corner, of the �`om1cE OP � s R �� bA�� - F C11 � i I PAGE I I II I I I I I I I r I I I I I I A I I I I I I I i I I I I I ,I, I r I I 1 I �F• site. Therefore, the requirements for Code Section 18. 108.080 which, states that commercial development with 99 a minimum access or less required parking spaces provide width of 30 feet and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. a , This code requirement has been satisfied. Co de Section 18 . 1 0� .020 P requires one bi c cle parking space for each 15 vehicle parking spaces in any development. Since 13 parking spaces are to be provided on this site, required for this development. one bicycle parking space is qu � �. p Therefore, the site plan shall be revised to show a minimum of one bicycle parking space. ,, As per Section 18. 108.08U,(;A1 the accessway is shown on the preliminary site plan, to provide the required 24 foot pavement width for a two-way commercial accessway. } , Code S e ction 18. 1.9.1.2.16104X requires uires that a walkwamm shall exten d fr om the main ground floor entrance of all commercial ,` developments to the street which provides the required access and egress. The proposed site plan indicates the provision of such a pedestrian access. Therefore, this code requirement has been satisfied. (Street Trees) states that all '' development 18. 100.030 fronting on a public street more than P projects 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees ..4 in accordance with the standards in Section 18:100.035. 1s This site fronts on SW Pacific Highway for ;approximately 170 feet. Therefore, street trees are required. Section j 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced, between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of i h the tree at i maturity (small, median, or large). The preliminary Site plan indicates proposal, of approximately r. four (4) street trees to be planted on the Site. Therefore, this code requirement has been satisfied. Section 18. 102 (Visual Clearance Areas) requires that a cleat vision ision area shall., be maintained on the corners of all adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways o in et he ,property. �d� a tersc:� t intersection of a public street and �,. private driveway. A P L � P �'y clear vision area 'shall contain no'vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structu�e. , or temporary or perma nent obstruction ctl on (ence t for an occasional utilit y p ole or tree) , exceeding 3 f eet in hei ght, measured from the top of the curb, o r where exists,, from tTrees line exceedin g this heig ht ma y be located in the clea r , viSion area provided all branches � are reloved No plantings or structures which ,obstruct vision are located I. within the clear vision area. This requirement has been Satisfied. SAG 5 NOTICE OF D8cxSZo�i snit ;93 a0©r F��te,ESCi�T` � • ' ,.,,,.. _i.,..... ..,... .._1_.,_,,..lk.,l 4...,....._ ...,.,..», .,.-.»..... ............:..,.. ... .. ,.,x,.,.... ,..__ ....,. . w..u...m.i 4....,,. 1„4....._,.. ..1" h .. ._,.. '..x,_,..,....r...... ,:u.-.__.u-..,w;ili . »..,.I..-...»..,..:1...,-,._,.;.•a....,.. 1 Chapter 1�.�5 0 contains ,standards for obtaining a required I permit for removal of trees having ing a trunk k 6 inches or more in diameter when measured four feet above the ground. The preliminary site plan does not indicate a need to remove any trees. If it becomes necessary to remove any trees, please note that no tree removal shall take place prior to issuance of a Tree' Removal permit. There are currently no trees on this site. , Section 10. 100.015PCl requires that the applicant submit a landscaping, plan. The applicant, has indicated on the site plan the proposed location of 16 trees located along SW Pacific Highway, and westerly portion of the site. Also shown are some portugal laurel, rhododendrons, rigid maples, and a variety of, other plants along the east and west property lines. Staff 'is unable to determine the accuracy . ra of the proposed landscape plan. Therefore, a revised site plan shall be submitted that shows clarification of proposed landscaping plan. Section 1 1 120 2 (Signs) lists the signs area permitted in tt. type p the C� g e of allowable igns arid, sign � � zone. All signs shall :,conform to the provisions listed in this code section. , All signs shall 1 be approved v ed throu g h the Sign n ker mit P r o cea s i i as administered b y the Plannin g Division and s hall comply 1 with vision clearance requirements. B. PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS: Sections X10 164,030E 1' ,,,a l (streets) , 18. 16, 4 a 09 0 (Sanitary Sewer) ,�� and 18. 164.100 (Storm Drains) shall be satisfied as specified below: r 1. IT Hi S � e The s ito is t c a t ed on Highway 99 ad d a cent t to the southwest oerner. . � .' of Fred Meyers.ers Highway 9, 9 is under rr t h e jurisdiction i sdic i. tn of the Oregon State Department of � p ta Lion. The si te WAS last Used .s' a gas station; theexiatin g buildin g is still site There are two exist in g drivewa y access points: 1) being a shared angresslegress With Fred Meyer the southeast corner the s ite and 2) the 1 other bin g along the frontage of the property and Highway n. Bass on the a preliminary plans, it is heir intent to keep and Maa.ntai both access points At the De artmeht of . he • . report the ' time �f had not submitted c h ,. ” ' ciali�nents fit e conditions the state will likely be looking for the following c ions of development: , NOTICE OF DEOISt011 SDR 9 -OOO7 FRANCgsc i PAGE i V fib'> .. ,,....r,...,._r a. . «..J..«...,,.,,....-, ., W.,.,,.,a,.,.t. la.....! .,i r._.:Jy. .,«,.,.[..... .,..+m r..«d0. a.,. ..a....,.,..,,..... .«,w. ,..,.,.,., i.:t. .., r..w.-:..':>:.+..,.....c.....,',.lw, n.,wti.,..:,...,.a.....,:•.A.,fw'..:,.ik-:..:..,1.;:.n:._... 4 1 li w4 A. Only one access point being kept opened and that being the existing shared access with Fred Meyers; B. Replacement of existing curb and sidewalk to meet t State standards; and ' V perform within G C.' A. Permit from the State to p �m the right-of-ways 1 . In conclusion, the applicant 'should,be required to meet the conditions of development as will be requested by the State. 2. SANITY SEWER: The is currently a service stub to the sight. No additional improvements are required. 5. STORM SEWER: " located above, the site e hard a service station loca A•s mentioned r' on it prior to this proposed use (the existing building is currently still on site) . After a field visit to the site . it w a s determined tha t the site slo pp es towards Highway hway 99 and there is ' an existing storm drain line that connects to the public line located in Highway 99 . The storm line located in Highway 99 is under the jurisdiction and Maintenance responsibility oo f the heOr on State Department of Transportation. Base d on p ast use aid the proposed use it o� runoff will does not appear that any add.�ta.c�na�, storm water be created. There f or e, no additional improvements are required. : established and the City has The Unified Sewerage Agency has agreed- (Resolution.to enforce Resolution and Order No. 91-47) Surface Water Management Regulations requiring the construction of i on-site water quality facilities or fees in-lieu of their construction. Section 7 .02 of the R&O states that t °'The 1 , provisions, af Chapter ?" shal l apply �t o,, ,a ll. activities ' which c r eate new or additional impervious surfaces. . . " . Since the intended us e will not create any new p ervious surf aces this application os not req i e to in s tall a on-site wa er quality facility or p a y a fee in-lieu of c !nstruction. SECTION PROCEDURE 1 , 1. Notice: Notice was publish ed e' in the e posted at City Hall and mailed to: , • IIbTXcE OF''DECxsXoN ' spit ,93-0007 - 'RANcE8c'l l PAda 7 it tt �. ,.,,_..,.._...„ ..,....:.4.' ,.,�+ . ,.„.—;+�. �.,...•, ,....,M. .«•..��,ti,a v....t�.; .a-..•_.1. u.t�.....r= �� i:..ai.««... r...._a.. .1..l,..441...„,.4.4.1�,»r..�..7.+.•.,,,.f-'.:-rµ.,l�,��.,��,r..�«.w��.,..•,..,•,r�.cr��....,...:.:,M..n_'a:.-.;,,C.r,.t.«....,,.«...4'vi:., I I XX The applicant is ant and owners wriers _XX Owners l of record within the required distance XX The aftected Neighborhood Planning Organization XX Affectod government agencies 2 . FinalDeci.° on: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON -I Fj3 UNLESS AN A.'PEAL IS FILED. 3. A eal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32 e 290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given ana sent. Appeal fee schedule and forms are available at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon. • u filing. The deadline ne f ar filing. aof an appeal is 3:30 p.m. % 4. Qggstions. If you have q q uestions o please call City of Tigard Planning Department, City of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon. • . I I I I I ILI I I I I I I I I I I � � Gr, I I PREPARED BY: Victor Adonri DATE Ic I ' Assistant Planner I I • I I I I r I I I I • arc APPROVED I ]Y e Dick BewI ersI d b r � DATE Senior Planner _ I I • I , I I I I I I I II I L I I I I I I I I I � I I I I I II _ NOTICE OF DECTs1011 sD t '91,0007 -'FRANCEISScHi p,0E a 1 I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I.' • • • �_. .a.x ...w,. ... _,.,,..x... ,,a .,, ,« ._ .... ,... ....,.,,...,x.14.,.,.. ..., t•.«. ,.�.'�! L.a.:,. .m,a.r, I. �+.��+..w..,.....« .-...r.. ,...,.«•....,...,.. .«_.....,....,.... p 44..T. tf11111 '1111 STREET L• MAA E �--- ..."--- . i 141 I _PL 1.EAP � ! I' r II 1,... in • � Y �� ... 1 , aa rill"' 111111111 a ail IN Ea ,, , 1 11.., 1, • NI I 111M 11 pill' I ral � PINE REET ,t A ,111111 J 3. 1, §i SPRUCE NE I '® 6 STREET mil III 4 1 14 1 I i di' .0 I r. '� ail • I " Mai . 4, i /A \C.1 i I I i h i, is , 1 1 mia - . 1 • . I I I I �6, . , ,,,, F�. IST a II • I icox I y � v►► l 11 • I , e ,l. r I c t.:',\''''' I s I I I I I a ;r _L71JfiT:I I �i IYLOR : fi I ,It I I aTQ U VA T I I I' I I I I , / , , • I, • h . w. ...,w ..a..,.,...,,,. -... -. w.- .�« .. ..... .«..v...... ......-w .,.,-„+,,,w.. ....tJ....:,M.,.:Mniw.w...«.�a I ,x.k-+..dr�+,�n,..,....•Y+-.nx.`�'"' ,.,n.l... a ..a L:t 1 Mr ?' • . .1 � �36D8-Oc 01 3C-00 .... . .. . N MO , dEfS DUANE COMPANY: d . 703�BRAY SUITE 605,. S E ,h VANCOUVER WA 98660 PO BOX 42121' i PORTLAND OR 97242 15136DB-.00500 . ° 1S136DB- 00501 . .......... INVESTMENTS S UNION > STRIE E % olitvaibt & GUITRON 1PAR,T!ER.aHIIP 'FR i ,�� & 1CRN B , 11619' S IFIC. Y ' .37 S MATEO T1�AD OR 97223 p ,.94903 ,�, . 1S136D8--00700 1S136DB-00000 ..,......•..,........... 141 CORBYIq',, catk'vErt D AND'' . • MORRIS, .JOHN C DAISY -E" , . 1 11621 SW PACIYYC RWX • 11 I 7 • .TIGARD OR 9722' . . � v Lei�61�`�N 0 00 .......4.....•..u.o w• 3 D00 « o . 7 GENSHAN, MITCHELL a ED' � GEMS► lie R & AL7[C'•Y� I� 963 SW.' NUS D DR 11 •GESM , Ii7TtL E' & DEBORAH PORTLY ( 9 720 9631 1� PORTLAND 'OR. ' ' 9720, X5136D8-02600 i 1S136DB-02601' . ....a.....I.....,.. . . STEWART, ,PH!LIa CST A, PROP' Co • T PORT11 D OR STEWART 'TRUST SHATTUCK RD 621 SW: lGlLEW0OD ASR 97221 ' OSWEGO OR 91034. ,- 02 - :�...,�.. 3. 135138 026 5 I I STEWART, fir.. S � . I � , ' 621 SW H,,. •..D baling J. � CS CR I 97A34 I I II I I s (w,MM� Z I 600 THIRD • i' �,yQ I I • .fl 7 I I . . , . , '',, . ,',, ',,. ..,,..'.'' .. ',..''''.:..:.'' :',,.''''.','.'.' ',, .''', ''',' ' '''''',„'''..''''''„' 1. I 1 8365 8W. ST8VE �, TI � X773 � �, 1 I I I I 1 , • I , I , I 1 I I II i , I 06'.' . J • lG tin v • • , I • II .. • „ , I , • 1 I • I I I I 1 I 1 II ti ERS INC t!, 1 P.O.BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360. Notice TT BEAVEFRTON,OREGON 97075 • . Legal Notice Advertising v AI,o , 1 1 itti 1 1 I 1 �+ P I I ® 0 Tear sheet Notice v ' • � City of Tigard (* �t 13125 SW Hall Blvd " �, 4 Oregon 97223-8199,, 1 �T'ig�.rd . �Duplicate Af#idav -.N�� ,��,...,.�. �.,.w kW W l,.i �, The fellowin will b 'coristi1er$d`by the Tigard Planning Coin ission • r �>11 . tithe Ta d, rs'vzc_iCenter r Town 14 1 , t Oregon 112 Sb '� alldie�r firths� %a 1 teeth oay;i ilv14Yd„ah p,b ,h g ica z 'accor ance With the 1e of`Chapter'� 1832 the T1g' l'd •�it iti; tt d � w a. a� p� s �-� ter. 1-�1 n� �am�t�t ��o � res��b c � d'� es�� d� ��da �th C d rtS e � AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION muse atn;xsstie in bier or of aryl Letter preciti . s a ati Ca1,and,;fa ll '. Op OREGON ) I speei y tl,,,,criterion,1 o `It Community Devela tztent Code,or ,C' STATE es,, ptehCns v i at r is ,a 0,.0..,\111, tit is clitect l p fluid !app btE'� • N ,� k. HIND ) 'Y O�V11�1� aned �► �latarti tlNT on o from' t, ® to� n 'a � �` t•s,;criterion''0'r�o>t� �tt�tft z � '' d` that , t. ' I Judieth Koehler iAstottnt 13125:g,'VC 0411 V b,:T1g0r 4;Otegtin 9 2' 8,cr by Date being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising 1 3 ' 1 ;, , , I ti t' • � � � Director, oi`his principal clerk, of the QRS �19 , �� , � ' �� ' �• �� Ti rd defined i+1 3„010 , PUBLIC 13EApg'+ , I a newspaper of general circulation as de ��.��,• 0 X120 published at in the end i � ” ) 1 � 1 of .,..?i, ,.1�� ' aresaici county and state: #hat the • I � � c�t� � �wa. .WC�' ,1��,'ta r copy of which is hereto anhexed, was published in the ' 0 . n;'�,ieal e� air A�ciniixnitint�V Decision'alslirc�ig �r. net,; a prints py Site evelopment? diiie tb illt w'rpttitrttction,of a$000 s 00r,-,,,f,', i f said newspaper for' One 1 1 entire issue o SUccessiv and cdtmrcal#cisi h+iidtt►g,'/.4 ' liV C 1itx iti, issues; ' tttuility tevdlopine it Code,Chapter,S 1 b62:t) Oy,1gbiOO;,,1810Z 81'. i:onsect►1iVe in the following 18';1018 18,11'4'18,120 d 1"g,, � ';0.0(CehOrat COiiiitiett 4 - . " Augu st 5 1 � 'I h C xo tiid" 11 ot ni Sa t ttd ad niti alies c��?{Y�ta ' I ��ppt�t �N�l ��1 p ��l b na)mo g' iAty}s+*a}'a6.sMtN eN fi6io�t i7 l , I ttipco .nd idot t t wNiergi'N$In, s$,P ri inr r 's adpati n a 1 tiro ling og biis flts,,aa one Mt1et pus s ; pr,7659 ltlbliskt August 190 1993,, !a ' , � ;, X x , i 19th da nr August, 1 cFi✓ICYA,LAL subscribed aid s�roriy to ��.fore me th9s�. �, �� '�� i' r 19 p I� �+pk�u, • or n OMMitSION N04 0 1 � MY:�0,M#�I $IqN t,PIFICS MAY 1g�/. • Not�r P'1 c'� �r8 My co►t li issirin Empires: ' I. AFFIDAVIT I 1 , 1 1 • i y. I , I I , , I • ' ' 1 , III, � �� 1 � � i � � I � � � � � � � � • 1 1 , I 1 1 , I 1 r I .. a ,._ 1 a r 1 ` ' � , 1 U P ERS I N ,n COMMUNITY 0 �� 765 � 1 . . P.Q.BOX 370 PHONE'(503)'684-0350. I otk o " BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 ' ,.‘6 ia. Legal Notice 1 t , • of `Tigard • 0 Tearsheet Notice G 13125 SW Hall Blvd. art Of tw ' • Tigard, Oregon 97223-8199 ' 0 0 Duplicate Affidavit 4 ,,, ' The toilowing will be p sidered by the Tigard Planning Ceinint$aiOt ttrt i Ch`s • ® ��` ,'t 'A L at: el xig d ivic ente . Town' ll,� ''1,3125 Sk Ul'..} I11:Bot vaurd Tig d Oregon,nbt republic OM aqd writtefl' , I eg�tf nt fly is invited. ` .tb pub�e hcaing on t is a t 9e er�nc ea. X*ill he�� 19, ' .�.�. ��rn accordance with a xutles of Chapter 1�3, l r`<:�,, x d' unicipal' �' r1,' ----- .. Code,and ru1eg and p edures,6 the Plan n` ig COnti ion Pailnre too 'iAh rp . . AFFIDAVIT OF r'lJBl~�1C�4lluN tttis an i§su�c if;person or by,iettei,p aoluodes ,appeal.,artd,E.al ate'td i specif the�'criterron(from the Co tntinrty Dave1opmtnt Code er'Conk- '1 !u STATE OF OREGON, )"` prehentive°P1a at Owlet*a�c tnen�t is dinectcdprectuides an app l ba d it CouN T'Y OF WASHINGT b , Ott tat bi to i n ' r o : nether info tlrirr may ,Meted from 1 ning biz ' Judith Koehler iy�sion a 13125 SAY,it vd,' i< Gd,, rcgaa 2 © by *t1it Il, 1,. f and say that I am 'the AAdVertisirig ,d39 17L ,, „ ''' . being fist duty sworn, depose arl Ta: rd TIM��. ,� I` � �', a ',,, Director,or his principal clerk of the __- s , ' , in ORS 193.010 , .PU Ft40,i AR[l C ' � � a newspaper of general circulation as defined f 't. � i �i1 inthe �� and 193,020; published at_._. . iT g p i; , ¢dry I ,ILIt it � aforesaid county and state; that the � � , �x`I"��I�� -� ��.,.,. � , �, •r�1n1 '�'rarl�e� hi LOCATION 119 5 . 4 �Paeific Highw� (WCTIVI 1St 36PP'taar Tot .. 0),''An eppe ,ef art, d iinistratitie 1)0,c.i jia 'app tki,,1 g e,f 4est fox a printed copy of which is hereto'annexed, was published in the ` te�] u'Viio e ` �►% w,t � 11ovoops ttetx�►r1 e ,.d,` Xgs � r `d"al sue of said newspaper for ��uacess v and �" entire issue ' Li cutive in the following issues 0nnnxty tevilopnnent e a Chapters`i8 52:O$O 1 1'OO 1810 18106 a comae . 1"sjo5,18!:11.4;:l.t,,120,ands'1$,164k' ON33 c4( n t1 Comi 1 r`ck1) 'c,'..'� August t 19 1993 Tito d zone a1iows,.,ubtro ageitioit�and'adtitinistf OtivO teri►icos;pnbl, , �. g, support facditres prrofessior 'l:� r a4mini t save servioer , 1p4iiiciulf ins ,, x 1 . urallOc rand a l dstafei r, ,hhs i s whpp oIt vIc ;o ►d eadng'�*nd 1��' , � ' drinking establi mont ,:among other'ti s}, ' I I,� ,i i° ar orjr'i..,, / I Tr7659,Pablish August Pi"100 1 , ,` '1 ,. : thda. Au� tasl": 9 e this � F�l�lAl: Subscribed and s�orrr tbfore nr6 � � � � a 1,. � � � �� r .rP'e - NO"tAtiv Pt11311c,W bfEG ON �Nota Fu c for Oregon , ) rN1 10 l'40,0246$2,MY COM RSiON X IOES MAY 10, 99/ .„M Co�mfisdiof E plrest I � i; 1 1 1 1 • I 1 4ffil!I k ■ . 1 ' 7.J'~ C• '.. w I I I AFFIDAVIT OF 'MAILING 1 , I I 1 I 1 I STAVE OF OREGON II • County of Washington 1 ss d y y ® ; Tagard , 1; I' ,_.._..,,,I being, first duly a�wornfaffirm: Ion oath'.' Ii I e. 1 1 I depose and say (Plear�e pr3�nt) 1 1 That 't 1 E am 'la 01( 0 1�� 1 t'or 1 { The I h Qf 1 City Tigard, Cregcan. 1 i 1 I That I served. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: k That I served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: I I /..,-."''''City of Tigard Planning Director 6 s'igard Planning Commission Tigard Hearings Officer , ' . 1 I Tigard 9ardCat y. Council I I ,1 1 1 I 1 I • A copy (Public Hearing Notice/Notice Of DeciaiOn) 'of which is attached (Marked Exhibit "A" was mailed n the own d to sac na of 1 attached list marked exhibit g h- �d r sirs ndea at the °a�� a Q11 r} the r m i s o t,i d ex ' "' _,, y 19`✓w bulletin id ntice NOTIC OFD r Iced r ste• e n appropriat e ! ECI ION as h+er to attar as pO n a on the 1 17`day Of c. • 19 deposited , in the ,United States Mail on the , • 4alel of r u ,',„„. .'.! 19 . ,' 1 postage prepaid. I 1 X1 I 1i 6 ...ftl?.1.ile—L:L12.... c_t/._ ',..,11, Vito'kiv74 - ' i Prepared Net Ce, I y, ' llf. arid sworn/affirm to me on the ,/,5_____,, day of : .ate : ,. . o i y . 1 subscribed a 1 1y42 . NOTARY PUBLIC O OttEGON j j .. ',My Cc►mtii.�s s a.ori I Exp:Lros. - ,1,� I r. I 1 1 ,1 rF f• 1 1 I rl f I' t ,I r I 1 lr r x , I I a ' 7 8 I�R r+ 1'I I 1 ,•%, !dab.JrI 1 III 1 I x' 1 1 1 d a I I r' I ' III 1 I 1 . 1 I 1 1 I I I , • (4 A (#;;I CITY OF TIGARD . NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR. 93-0007 FRANCESCHI OWNER / A.PPLICANZ' Development Review a approval to . APPLICATION: A. request for Site PP allow construction of a 5,000 square foot commercial retail building. Zoning: C-G (General Commercial) Location: 11595 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 151 36DB, tax lot 200) . • SECTION . I DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director's designee for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which h the decision is based are noted in Section II. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, THE STAFF CONTACT SHALL BE 'CHRIS •,DAVIES OF THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. • . 1. A revised site plan shall be submitted for approval which P indicates the provision of the following: One disabled • person parking space, and one bicycle parking space. A revised landscaping plan which shows the p rovi sion o f a mini$tum 15% landscaping as required by node The revised shall include the total S footage plan shall oota f deva ted for landscaping. STAFF CONTACT: Victor Adonri, Planning Department. A and maintenance recorded for � agreement shall be executed and 2. all common driveways The agreement shall�.. be referenced on and agreement become part °f. pp " parcel M. P all a ladable arc shall be reviewed by the Engineering Department prior to recording. 3. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, to perform work within the " he of Highway '99 . A copy of the permit shall be provided to the , City Engineering Department. 4. The a pp lie ant shall me• e t the requirements qu sof thI e Oregon n Department of Transportation a s it to the frontage of the site and the State r at o f°way 1 IIN ADbITION THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF•.THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE; SECTION 10. 120 060 BOND NO AND ASSURANCES and SECTION 18.164 HE STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS. COPIES MAY BE OBTAINED... ....-. T3ROUGH THE+ FLANNING OR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS NOTICE of 1 EdISXbN $DR 93 ' a r i I THIS APPROVAL f.� AYE IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE I . DATE OF THE FINAL DECISIONe ;; I F 41 SECTION Y �� I. FINDINGS OF FACT ,� I � . 1. Background: I ( . 4 The subject site is currently developed with an existing gas 1, station'' building which is proposed to be demolished. No ? subsequent ,lands use applications have been filed with the City for this site. 'III 2. Vicinity Information: The subject site is located on SW Pacific Highway 'adjacent. to the, southwest corner f Fred Meyers Shopping p Center. The o �' surrounding properties are zoned C--0 (General Commercial) , 1 P 4_ and are substantially developed. ' 1 I I. 34 Site Information and Proposal Description: e The arced. size a ' ! I subject parcel is approximately 0.35 acres in and y ,�• was last used as ' a gasl station. The existing building is . ICI is still on site, and is ro osed to be demolished.� Access to � proposed the site is available from SW Pacific Highway. , The applicant proposes' to construct a 5,000 Square foot Kt commercial retail building. 4d g 'A enc and NPO Comments The of T�9. and Building Division has review ed this t proposal and has offered the following comments: 1 s are approved City's Plumbing• ' I Catch basins ins , to be oven �by I the C�ty,� gl I � • Yn,s actor p • � I The Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue #1 has reviewed this 1 proposal and has offe red the followng comments: � I c Fir, e h dra' ms are required within ?50 feet of all portions of the measured aroun d the outside and gocess r. � y shall submitted to 1 the dire District for review and approval. . .... ..i V r The State of Oregon h� . l lS�CCn hat this t , proposal and has of fered the following comments I I I I • NtJT� CE 'OF L1BC#��oP� 6b � l7 Si� '9 a�7 FR��)�sc�i� G � I a�A >� 2 I �I I II I , • II I 'I, I , I I I r i I I.. , 1 • I I • X • I I ,...,.. ..,,. w_,.,.,.,., ,,.1....,..., ,i ............. ....... .,,,...._.,..,. ....._.......,.,..._,......,.,...,,.....,.,....,.,i.....i....,-.....,.,......,,,«.rM..... .,,..,.. w u.,„.,.i ,.,,......w .. ,—. ,Dt..,_... .,...,...,,.,...a,..:,t,..,.......a:.NA.„„-,.-,mow. M...u....,..M.,,-.n1-:,.�i.,.,,.. .. , I' I I I I I f • , 0 joint.7L use access will only be permitted on the east. end of site I f current o Curbs and sidewalks to be constructed to II I I I , standards. o Applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from Oregon. . Department of Transportation for access and other work within the right-of-way. k The Neighborhood Planning Organization #8 has reviewed this i. proposal and has offered the following comments: The handicap parking site is not van accessible. . A F 9 I I • Tualatin'Val1e Water District, General Telephone and Electronics, Tigard Public Works, School District #23(J) , Northwest Natural gas, Portland General Electric 'thave' reviewed this ' ti this application ' and have offered no comments or objections.I I ' LI. I , I . I SECTION z T a. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION A.I I C OMPL 1 ANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT I CODE SECTIONS: , I I The . a AF'licart I has indicated that the proposed new use of this this si te is for G eneral Retail Sales. This use is classified in Code Section 18 42I;' (Use Classifications ' as � � I Retail Sal' { 030 allows General General �t Sales. Code Secl::ion. 10.G 2 Retail Sales as a `permitted use "in the general Commercial , . zone4 sec 050 states section �lSii�62 . rtes th is lot area , for in the' C there s e . .. that no minimum parcels .�"tlThe average lot p zoning t minimum lot wi °°G zon et. � � a � n distric av width shall be 50 feet. his, site is approximately 15 4 17' square feet in size with an average minimum lot width 1 A og. approximately � h s' the C�-G feet zoning district are area required Developments�provide a minimum zoning �, A na.rnum of 15% " dsca ing approximately 15,417 square. I ��an p`. �' on the site. Of the app � :� foo t site applicant proposed , the applic ' p t o retain approitimately 10,417 square feet of existing land for landscaping and other improvements.'� other Applicant has not • _,- landscaping. `Thezefoeed the actual s ota.g`e devoted for plan shall be 1 1 square foOtage �which� shows the preliminary s landscaping of a minimum 15% ( provided p r` I � landscaping as required by the zoning district. I The site p la n shall also include t he square footage devoted for i landsdap ng d I „ PoTICg 0? DECISION aDR 93-0007 o� . F RArcEscxI pAcE 3 I 3 , I i I I I , I , I I J;. I i r , o _ r H Section 18.62.050 requires specific setbacks for developed sites in the C-G zone which abut residential zoning ' Sinc this parcel surrounded on all sides by districts. Since. this is sumo 1 other properties which are also C-G, no buildin g s etbacks I . are required. ±I Sec taon 18. 06 030C 11 (Minimum J f f- S treat Parking Requirements M General Retail Sales) requires one parking space for each 400 square feet of gross floor area. The Commercial retail building is approximately 5,000 square 1 feet. Commercial retail building of this size require the :, provision of a minimum of thirteen ( 13) parking spaces. The site plan indicates that thirteen (13) parking spaces will be provided. Therefore, the preliminary site plan meets the number of parking spaces required 'and, therefore satisfies, this Code requirement. . The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) . which became effective on January r'26 1992, requires two disabled person parking spaces if 1 to 25 parking spaces are provided. The proposed Site plan does not show a provision for one disabled person parking space. Therefore, a revised site plan shall be submitted which provides for one disabled person parking space. The preliminary site plan indicates t ha t o ne driveway n ea r. the southeast portion of the site is to provide access to 13 . . parking preliminary ` cater I I p ng spaces. The bite plan also ' inch provision of another driveway at the southwest corner of the site. Therefore, t h.e requirements for Code Section 18. 108.080 which states that commercial development with'I'99 or less required parking provide a mini ' spaces � rov access � pl �' • P avement width of 24 feeta width of 30 feet and a minimum This code requireMent has been satisfied; Code Section 10 requires bicycle parking e for each 15 vehicle le parking spaces in any development. space parking p any 13 parking spaces Ye provided on this Site, Since' s I are to be I one bicycle parking space is required for this the development. t. �refor e ' � n tar be revised to bnaw a minimum of one bicycle parking space. 1 I I II Section 18. X08.080 A. the accessway shown o. As per on the ' p y Preliminary provide the required 24 foot •� pr �.n,a�y site plan to pro, . q vement width for a two-way commercial accessway. foot pavement fo y y !. Code Section 18. 108.05 0(A) requires that a walkwayshall � from the main ground of, round f l which entrance�ra�tirequired� extend ro e o all commercial te t p ides try' the street the and Ogress' .ress. The proposed developments. r acCes� si•te play: indicates the �. o axoN 5 IRd�I�`cE�ScH 'I I �� X00., �o �� 7 �' .. � I � pAGFI • I � 'III I I I I I I I I i I I I r Y e .t..6.. .. ,.....1'.w.,..t .... .......,....,...«.,.,,,...,,,._. ,.... .............. ....I....,..r.x..... ,...... .. I...r.... .r,...,..,,...,. ,.,:I'....1w..uw4Jr61..., ...., ,.. ,..,..,.. „!.I,,.».r. »..,...r.,....r....,4r.. ..r .w,..n.. .r,,,..«._,.ter a*a. r..r.. r .,r:1. ..4,L.,... provision of s uc h a pedestrian access. Therefore,Ore this Code requirement has been satisfied. Section 18. 100.030 (Street Trees) 1 states that all development projects fronting on a public street more than required to plant street trees 1, 100 ,..feet� in'��l�ength��l�shall be reel p ' � � ` in accordance with the standards in Section 18.100.035. i r I This site fronts on SW Pacific Highway for approxim atel 170 , feet. Therefore, street, trees are required. Section + 18. 100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 �� size classification of '' and 40 feet a� art��depending I on the p I I the tree ee a t maturity (Small, medium or large) . The 1 preliminary site plan indicates proposal of approximately I four (4) street Iltrees to be planted on the site. Therefore, I'. this code requirement has been satisfied. ' .. Section 18. 102 (Visual ua 1 C Jear an e Areas) requires ires that a . clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all f property ,adjacent to i ng' right-of-ways or thel ntersec��i . intersection of a public street and a private driveway. clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction'` ` �I except for an ocdasional utility pole or, tree) ,( 3 feet in height, measured from the `top of the curb, or where no from street center line no �curb�� exists, �'�r m� 'the � 'n grade. ; ` Trees exceeding this height� ght` may be �Iloc:ated in the re�oved vision area, provided all branches below 8 feet a re No plantings or structures which obstruct vision are located r within the clear vision area. This requitement has been satisfied, required Chapter er t for removal of trees having a trunk 6 inches or more ii t in diameter when measured four feet above the ground. The K I r . I preliminary site plan does e not indicate aie a need to remove any ' true s. X f it beGomeS necessary to remove any tressl note removal shall r to issuance of a Tree Removal permit. There axcurretl no trees on this site. • Section 18. 100 .015(0) requires that the applicant submit landscaping plan. pp' has indicated on the site proposed locations of 16 a trees located along SW plan � the ,'prep s � � of g � Pacific ii hwa1 r and we sterll' portion of of the site. Also shorn are I ! some partu�alla rhodod endro� e maples, ' and a variety of other plants along the east and West , property lines. Staff is unable to determine the accuracy "� C'f the proposed l atids c a I p plan, Therefore, a revised site plan shall be submitted that shows clar fidai ion of ;proposed landscaping plan • NOTICE oV DECISION SDR 93-0007 i IPRI14NckSCHI I PAOE 5 I i II I , I I I I I I II I I , r I I I I ! rr . I r r ,f V Section 18 , 114. 130(D) (Signs) lists the type of allowable f 1 signs and sign area permitted in the C-G zone. All signs this code section. shall conform to the provisions listed in t h All signs shall be approved through the Sign Permit process as administered by the Planning Division and shall comply with vision clearance 'requirements. B. 0 ERNS. PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS: Sections 18. 1j 6 4 ,03 0 F 1) (a (Streets) , _18. 164.090 (Sanitary ° satisfied as ` (Storm Drains) shall be Sewer) , and 18 . 164Y100 S specified below: ( l. STREETS: i I is located on Highway '9 9 adjacent to the southwest The site a. a corner of Fred Meyers. Highway 99 is under the jurisdiction of the Oregon State Department of Transportation. The site was last used as a gas station; the existing building is l still on ' site. There are two existing driveway access . , . points: 1� the first being a shared ingress/egress with b corner the site and 2) the Fred Meyer aloe � southeast corner of ° ) � a Meurer on the sou other being g the frontage of the property and Highway G 99. Based on the applicant's preliminary plans, it is their i ' intent to keep and maintain both access points. t' At the time of this report the Department nt of Transportation had not submitted comments to the City.. Based on past decisions the State will likely be looking for the following : conditions of development: 1 opened and that c ess point being kept o en, a, A. Only one a c being the existing shared access with, Fred Meyers; B Replacement of existing curb and Sidewalk to meet State standards; and Y h State to perform work within C. A Permit from the S p the right-of-way. i _ In conclusion, the applicant should be required to meet the p conditions of development as will be requested by the State. I SEWER: SANITARY s currently , a �� . ��,to � the� sight. �� o 'there � service � stub � �o � � �� additional 'Improvements ate required. I 1 la Esc SbR �3 OOt� � FZ�NC 1 H A NOTICE OF DECISION Sb 7 I I I !' i•Y n...u,.. ,.«... ...+4.,. -J'...,.. .,i J.. ..n... J ......,,....,. u,r .,..h,..1' r4.•, .+1. ,..N-n,.,,._.. .n........, ..,ilr„u..J....,.n.9.4..n«.J.....e....w. .ti.....+.e., AM.....n....r .,.A.r ,.....,.. ..,,r,... ..,.1..n! .mow...... ,...r.l.•..,,...,H,..F ..,i4'..H RY I I I I 3. STORM SEWER: As mentioned above, the site had a service station n located on it prior to this proposed use (the existing building is I currently still on site) . After a field visit to the site it 'wr .�.. was determined that the site slopes pes towards Highway 9 9 and there is an existing storm drain line that connects to , II the public line located in Highway 99 . The storm line located in Highway 99 is under the jurisdiction and • 9 maintenance responsibility of the Oregon State Department of �° Transportation. Based on past use and the proposed use it does not appear that any additional storm water runoff will I.' I be created. I Therefore ' no additional ' improvements s are required. r P' The Unified Sewerag e Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce (Resolution and Ordar No. 91-47) Surface Water Mai e e gag am n't Regulations requiring the construction of I I on- site water quality facilities or fees in-lieu of their construction. Section 7.02 of the R&O states that: "The provisions of Chapter 7 shall apply to all activities which create new or additional impervious surfaces. . . ” . S�.d rxce the intended use will not create any new impervious surfaces ' this application is not required to install a on-site water quality facility or pay a fee in-lieu of construction. 1 . I I i r I SECTION IV. PROCEDURE I F I ' 1. Notice: Notice Ce was published in th e newspaper, p Dated M at City Hall and mailed to: I I I L` rXX The a pp licant and owners I � XX Owners of record within, the required distance XX rnrThe affected Neighborhood Planning Organization XX Affected government 'agenC ies 2. I I y ., I Final' Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE r FINAL arr UNLESS AN APPEAL ISl FILED. , r 3. I decision in accordance wie decision may appeal I this y th Section 10.32.290(A) and Section °18.32.370 of the f r I Communit y Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with I the City seAppeal y Recorder fee s h edule and forms are available at Tigard City'C iHall 13125 SW Hail Rlud. , Tigardb Oregon.' I I I I I I is I I I I The deadline for, fild�ngg of an appeal s 3:30 p.m. 23 3 , I I I NOVICE OF aL OxSIoN SbR 9Jw 0b07 FRANaESCHIl PAC E 7 I I I I I I I II I I I �• ail I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I i I I I t.. e • x • f ' i4», _ nN-.,,........... »,..L1....».. .+.r :1;..«.,.,_...�... .. .y..�. ,.,..r.ro:1l.. •IAK ••• .s •1M u rr F.444, h.r. A{{,.11 .41..440 444 4,74 , • w 4. Suostions: If you have questions,ns , P leaso call City of Tigard Planning Department, City of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hail Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon I I' I I I I i I I' I Q / II PREPARED BY: Victor Adonri DATE Assistant Planner • • I I APPROVED BY: Dick Bewersdorff DATE Senior Planner I . f 1� 1 I � I OAK MIr � �II Ej-_H Ill EMI u•I Ili Raw 111111111111 ■ - .1.11 =NEE lc.,.. 1111111111 111 tram • I I 4 I � mm ail NMI Ns MN owl r mmi is,. MINN I I , / I I � I I I I I I I ' I I I I I I � I I I I I I � I I I OTId OP" DEC OOb7 PRZ1NCESCHI • • I I I I I I i I I I I I I „ I , , A • aw.n+ .-.l_..,„. +-��n.,..» .,... .. ... ,f..._�,..._..w�.„_.A � � Y� I I r: lr''w/"” w «� p� C+ +� T� i$,,j y 1S136DC--00500 1,v 1S136DB—OD�201 w w w w w w 1►•• I TOM MOYER THEATRES HEATRES I DUANE COMPANY I I 703 BROADWAY SUITE 605 ATTN: PROPERTIES DEPT VANCOUVER WA 96660 I PO BOX 42121 PORTLAND OR 97242 I 6 5 w � ew 1Sx,36DH 00500 1513 D8-0i� O1 w y �,w.. .w.. .. w • COMMERCIAL INVESTMENTS I UNION ,GOSPEL MIN STRIES OF PTLD % GALVAN & GUITON PTERSHIP' I % FR �► ESCI, IOE & KENNETH • • • 11619 SW PACIFIC ' ' ', 37 7 SAN MATEO CT TIGARD OR 97223 ' SAN RAFAEL CA 94903 I' 1S136DB-00700 15136DB-00800 4,044444o*r y 4 e CORBIN, GROVER D AND I, 1 MORRIS, JOHN C DAISY E HELEN L 1 .62], SW PACIFIC HWY ,, 11631 SW PACIFIC HWY, I TIGARD OR 97223 . TIGARD CSR 97? 3 a I I� 1S1 w. s e • •. D7D3-�009Q.0 ..'»....p'' .1.S1.36DB—OlOflO GENSMAN, MITCHELL EDWARD H1 1 � GENSMAN, LEE R & ALICE L 963 SW WESTWOOD DR % GENSMAN, MITCHELL E & DEBORAH , . PORTLAND OR I 91201 � I ' , , 963 WESTWOOD ' ' PORTLAND OR 97201 72 01 ' l� I �1513�OB-02600 . . w. 1S136DB-026111 . • STEWART, PHYLLIS T AND, ' ' A/.4PROP CO STEWART TRUST, : I' 6149 SW SHATTUCK ENGLEW O 621. SW 000 ISl PC7RTL? ND OR 91221•LASE OSWEGO OR I 9703$ I . i 15136UD��-02602 'a iir T o•Iw.r s w d .Y iw r'd M.b d w � • w I I P I II I STEWART, S I � 'I '" r I I I r r I "` ! , 621 5� R ... ~.WOOD DRIVE' I OSR 97034 �� I I ' I I KEN & ,18R0ME ?ANCESCHf I 600 THIRD ST SAN FRANCISCO—:CA :,, 9 94107 r�� I I I r I I C�� Y CHASE I 4, I ' i I I l 1 l' I I TIOARD �OR : 97228 I, I I II I, i I I• • 'Ili ,1, 1 �,�, 'k I 7 I I I I I i I 11 t I I I I II D � I ow '1 i i i 1, ' III �, i i I I i ' ' i I I k �I I . ,�•9^ J, W� . 'o , `( G;,...,,....,—.L.:,,._,.,..a.. .,.,.,, H.,...,...a:.�,�....;w.. ,„.,n,.,.w.,,-1,...:,„,.,.,....,,.,,,....n.,.4..,.y..a.w.+..;,,,..lw.N.....<,,,,,..,..i,.;,.IM,..x.,,.i.�,:.:.4....tHUl.,w„,l.„4..∎...,,;,,...,-,,,,,,:„-.4,4,,,—, ....,,..ar.W.a.�n,..„.:.,..-« .+u.all�-- .wF,,..«-��.....-....,�,-.._„_.u.._.w:-a-,..,,..�-,:1=..,,h4... . . L , COMM UNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC r �'.f r. box 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 EEAVENTO�I,',(OREGON 97075 I'`C'l ' alit:O1�I'+rd 1 , 'i y �$„ „b0_7 ry Legal Notice Advertising The Pii Oat Mlas tipprpili 'd,siabjoot to Conditions,Site 'i. yxow,rcq et I' 10* opstlnictron of a'5'000,squa ' • :etaxt` ii1 in � ' 'Y, �3 VIA C �T 0 l'earsheet Notice g ' . Devclopmer,t.Cede Ci aptors 1.$:j62.050,18100 1$:',102;'1,„';' City of Tigard 05' .;N l,$.1�,�;`.��1,�'a,t{n�;18��; �,�iCATT'OI'+1'a �1� � A.. • att L. Terry • 0 Duplicate Affidav , (VU,C1: 1,s,,�g,61' i,' x iot 90), 0, '!{Ope r 1,CQ 13135 SW Hall Blvd. CO'zone 41 OWS pubi'r agency- nd at m'iiniitrativc'g . Tigard, Or. 97223 • ,, S ppo.rt,,ft ci tLes;profq 'siotiat'quid bitstness, upport 060.0. 44 wing lstablishn ants atneng other ttsd's4 �i 1 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION '..'',c4 II t ' , S 111 1 11 ' .,A; yss. .. a .�L1C �a�1 Koehler: \, `, ®IAt�n¢1' E I being firat-duly sworn; depose a4idl say that I am the Advertising its �Ii ,,. Director, or his l principal clerk;.of the._ .d ilne ,_ � �. � � III �:��111��16NI ��i�. � , I a newspaper of general I,cireulatuon as defined in ORS 19'3.01 q� aforesaid county published and state;that h -- - �n tt!� 4 ` �� t ' a,i.e 5•�fro delte3 Dnteint revietg/ 93-0007 ranco chi jp) , copy o annexed was �, , ' e , a' printed of Which is I�eret ttb, ed in the co � lish r� entire issue of said news a er f ♦ , �� said P E� or_. � One �� _successive and , � � �. .. .� . � j , consecutive in the following issues: ! .;�. {, „- 1 Jr, c ,J___y_ 8, 1993 � �' . s� ,� .tom L' ri ,l1 &NE 1 ..,,,,, r/h, 4 ''' . I y I e tha � ► y_ y. �� Si�,`i't'd�.V,�f � ,� F.. '�4 r I I S�ubseri`ib�ed and�swol n to be �� $ �� 3 � � $E '�� I. Notary P tc for Oregon „ ,,, , . . r 1 - , ., ' I My Commission Expires: ��u a � ��.t' n rt Sao dicis.toe1 i��l`sllt4totitdnl ot 0' io,f i t , n ►( JV�1 obt rej txotc the?(arming Vi,e arLmht T g ltd t*Yvic Cefl k; Oat13ird.,,P, + o 23391,F d,Ore on 911.;' 3 1ie deoi , r1aL n,J `1 9;3 w,Aily �y i ti, cci i0it t s tiv6i(y rtit Accord vitISeetibn 1 32.290'(AY old$4clttoti :g I Cor ' {Ro 1l ”. f 10 �Ys aT@tr rt d 'ce as gi ven Snd; cttt�'th,, II I � 9A W� � i L � �. a t , , r ,, I I i II i I I I II , I I I I, I r I I � r i I i , r . „ i i + -"..,. J...� ,..�I.....» . .«.r4.:.r-.......,i-.r .n....ah.....�.�......-.."....,1,k'... wb� .l».:1.�...r:,.�......... .... ....i,.. ......,.. ...+, "+...".w...«.. , '�4...�..,...�«. ....,.....�..,...tuu. ..ar A,�..., a. �....w.....".a •J ' I I c I d k t t 'M an • � r COMMUNITY o i Lslg ab, �a a Z , � IotC P2O � • �0 • . BO 370 PHONE(CO3)6840360 I p 1. • ; 2w r X ' rEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 I S'il I ;Nitl.)I• I 'i" W§D t 3O 0'�, I , I„ 1 ft ' I „E CESC I"' , „(NPO#8) e, Legal Notice Advertising The Dirodtb• ha 'appxwrwed;Hsubjeot to canditigns, "it ,DeVelbp an I r I3 e vxe� tequit Ito`a11e conS.truet,o` of a`a;Q00 4Wre foot coimm r ia1 a A,`' I • 0 Tearsheet Noticf ' 01ax ,b 11c a� 1 I.,.1 A13L1,' EY1.. : . Z4s 41,0 Mr r, •I 3e4loprnent Code Chapters'l'..$2ao5O18 Oa,.18O , 18,1O6r 18108,t" of Tigard i1114, 1812O;aidl84164LOC.ATION: 0 595, T a 0 puplaCale Aidsr (WCT Isi 86 t k 20 ) O E.C- ( erne lCbnt a ia e ,i n erry , :5 SW Hall Blvd. °`CMG zor�e.;j1lows.public agoncy,and':ada►a�as,,rativ� servzces;l`,pttblh'c `" •, >er .,'rd Or. 972 e 'suppoilt faeflities.y stratrve ervice financ.a', �' " �rasslarral aidd imp a, 1' • w a `xitsud"an e'a► rea1 estatO'Or`,VAC4l ,b.ii irnees s ls`tippnrt eri.l�ces it' d eating ,> and dru king':a tatb1fshmenls'Irl origi other o os,,t 1' k 4 ..r_.... �.. f6IE� I111i ' i m t l � ,I i �' .' . AFFIDA�°I`!+ OF PLIBR�IGA1'RORy OREGON,' ill K F iIWASHiNGT()N, ) �L^ , of '''1''; ► Giisd i.t~h Kaet1 I :'• t duly svvbrh, depose aihd say that I am the Advertising li ,, ,, or hiss prireCipaq Clerk, Of th �'.�.,g�rd '1~�mom_ 1 ,� ;" per'Of general circulation' a% defined in ORS '193"9''1b � ® �I 020; published'at: d in the `' count_y,'and state; that,the Wail* illi" 1. 1 '�.'a0 I�. • .i[-„ a.4�w/ 93..0007 'rance8ch�: _ ,;. Co of�which is,hereto annereda was ublished id they ': copy p I,�'4 p C,.:' :uo of said newspaper far One successive and ' ! ' • I. I� t . I've in the following issues: a --, I) . x.993 .,.L 1 � 4 t F r ^i,,, 4' I I • d i I' :' 'INI1 ■rs: " '::11101 i: ', : '' . : ,!H.' .: .:.:', ,,.„, ling .• :1''t ,'''" :, ','':' ' ' n . 7-, 7,41Ar -...-,,,,.. , 1 1 , c/c„,-- , 1 1 ,12:,Plil VW "" - , ..H••' H',.':.,,,, ,''..•• '.• "a,,, ::,..• „• : ..,7".-,'••.-,4,-,1•.,',••, : , • ed and sviaorn to be nie this � . , �„6.---1/4, .:4&„, , j', t �. I I date P' t c for Oregon ,✓ ," fission fix"iPes: I ' h, I' ± ,. . y t� p t`acts �� I , cot p di,fidx P ui�tsC t�t7r1 csint b ,1~I " ti g ak � ��sae�i�and�c�t�rtz�ti,t o�c�n:n� ,t:•,,a xr. VET ' the 1�tting r t pathttear 114 Itd Clvie }1311 S;W • ri Bait 13lv(ll,, '',C), 7x 23 /; `igardy Or gon'' 1223`."1"kIe•dd' •isiati(04a11 Div Y°. 11iial On'Tti V tfd: 19 Any p rty,to, e decx ""ot ' ay nip a1 thig deci i „n ,r ;n ecord 8>32c o , a � �+itRt��aUon, f�r.�2�2�� :A'nl d'.aet.tl'o �. '� e� � I .I � � I, 6 ICI 'A. � �1 1�.1' I I' I t" r. atirt tte a rig iC' a fist°I. t 1tl .dv c n i etc eta �# a: a I 1 p � la .� Y y I I p I. �r be '''3 ' , t ►days eiftea',dc ticc,it's agzve,�ati 'scrit�::'11�c t etid1ftae'&at ?,.I film�, t1.1s 3"301 J 4;'l'iity Ili 1993, F, , �!f „J I .I. r I ;IC I ,i,,.1:01 , I I 1 I w d 1 I I 0;,1:: : 1,,,,,:,:l I . it , I I dN' I II , I, i I l , I I , I I I n I I I ) I ...". a'.,.,:,. ....a.'. ''. ';; ..'' e,..,. ,. ,.1.a „ a v"", a,�..,, ., .. ., ,. ... ,.,.,, �,,., ",..,,. .,x.�"•... r,l.. ., ,., I•40- , a ' I � I I I • I , • • ...�..+ ..w»..wf..,....•.,F. ,.+„a„A,Ah..«« 4. ,... ...L,,,» f». :.+,,.,.,....„,r-. nY.�,..« ,3..d,.I..H,_....M,..,...w. J,,..s.A-.«r-+I..+ ,,,�.,-.-..r..r...,�.x..,..,:.t,:M L.l,ik�uw ,•J....rv.l. .«bx..,J...-+.<,,...�.,..,J..- ,plJ: h r n.-.r �, I MRY 20 '93 16:4B PRINCETON EXECUTIVE SUITES P.1/1 OREGON BUSINESS E • I II • I May 20, 1993 ' I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I , I • Jerry Offer, Planning Departmexut City of Tigard I t c 13125 a Blvd. �V � Il Tigard, OR 97223 . I I I Subject: Site Development � pie Package I I Y r 11595 SW Pacific Highway Tax Map ][.mote 25136 DB, 200 . I I I I I Dear Je r : I I I I , I , Y am 'swilling to inform you t'.. the owner a subject)property has 'etained t[1le that of the ' services of a registered professional traffic engineer to evaluate the site access, ' I , We expect t hat his sE c e�w�� t�take FP r Q�na�t�� 3 to ��tQ and request st that your decision be postponed to allow the appropriate agencies time to review and consider the en. .eer"�s fis�dau d • II ' I I I � • I � I'I I I • I I I I Please phone me with any questions you may have. I Sincerely,I Ill IL , I I 1 • I � I of tgn Architect • 1 , • II , I I I � i I II • I I I i V I I I j I 4 I I ' I I I I I I II I s I I I I I C II II I ra ' I '&21 SW Alder,Suite 530 PorYIInd,Oregon 97051.503/228.974 TALC/241,O70 • • _,a/4.4 ....,,�r.,+..«. »,1,n.,rr x l,»ne. w.,., ,i» t i, - } � ;lo od au..w.,«. a.,...a.,.nM ' ,Nw.,u.rr 'w„..,,,,,,� lw�4.,..,,1„"nl...,r..,,�.�,nrS..,7,..,P.:a«..Ix...una,.;., r. KNH 1 1 Vr E • OREGON BUSINESS ARCHITECTURE l C; RECEIVED PLANNING APIA April 21, 1993.', I I I II I II Mr. Sam Hunaidi Oregon Dept. of Transportation, 2131 SW Scholls Ferry Rd. Portland, OR 97221 • RE: Site Development at 11595 SW Pacific Highway Tigard, Oregon Dear Sam: I In an effort to maintain adequate parking and circulation for both automobiles q p g both u xnabrles and. emergency vehicles and at the same tune, lessen the traffic impact on Pacific Highway, the applicant would like to propose traffic controls at the existing west driveway as highlighted' • on the attached drawing. This is an addendum to the lte development -,' a at � Ilac application made to e PP h City of 'Tigard last week, Please 4 pl se one me n icn should you a have any questions, Sincerely, I , I I I I I I I I I F. a otn 1 II g I I I I I Architect , I ' I . I � II t cc: Ken Fran I I cesch�, applicant City of Tigard Planting Department I I I I I I I I I I , I I I II I I I I I I I I I , I I , I' I b I I I I I 621 SW Alder,Suite 530 r Portland; Oregah 97205 a 503/228-P747 FAX/241-0702 I I r I I , • • f • m•5f.i...L..v ,.n«„i..,..H. .V-.,,..lr.lx,wa.......w.....,. ',..ii,. . 11/4 ,., ..1 :.... . . 1i , 1 , 1 a ,. .1 . . 1 . .1 . . , , 4 ' ' ''''' ''''\ ' 'L'1 '' '' '' '''' ' ;' ': ''''''', ' ' 11''' 1 ','.4-. 1t-L-. ' ,'1' ,,' , ' , ,,?6(dif?_ i• . , • . , , , . , , „,,,,..., . . . 1.,....;:::,* ' , , , , • . . . N -, O 1 , ., , , , . o. k) . ,,,, , N y,, ,....________,_________. . J ' ► I y 1: 1 t , 1 1 I • ■ , 1 ./..'•'.:.' I M`i-I lI.°dd l)6'-� t 't I • 1f qr PP.A : {; :• J+ i•, i ! 2 ,1 ;� w •t 11 crt:::7/ ■,.. s. ' '‘j rt.+ . 1 • l VV 441 , . 0• I 1 1' "t , • �'\ ; ( //41,k, ,, :;`:.1 ', 1' 1 , , 1., (so , .. ' ', ':, ' ' . �! ` t 11s ' I '+t + •'i . + I + r��vp , I yp 1 / t' I Q�)� )is • e ,k , , H dA I • tt—i ' " . I 1 I , , , e ' 1 ...... , %1 tik I C '''.'''' , SN / 0 ss hh r 1 t:...S' �.., y. 1t 1 1 • 0 tl t • i 1 I vii/ N I A I A w I t ■ I ♦ 1 1 it V t i�f 3 y 2 hA Ar I I A _1 J P • I 1 i I I ' 11 fir, tt - ,/V , 11 t E 111111111111111111111111111111111111,11111111111111111ftb__'411111111111111111111 i ! aa MEMO V M CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Victor Adonri July 23, 1993 I' . FROM: Chris Davies, Development Review Engineer �.. RE: SDR 93-OOO 7 Descri'p tion. The applicant proposes to construct a 5, 000 square foot commercial retail building. f study after we had completed our ri had submitted a traffic The applicant s � p comments. The applicants engineer implied, through the traffic study, that if the access on Pacific Highway is closed their would be traffic conflicts; thereby requiring both access points. While we do not �. disagree with this; it is also our opinion that with the current access locations their is also the concerns with traffic conflicts, the situation and feel their are alternatives We have reviewed 'th si 'on �` el th 'ivies which } ' • could alleviative the traffic conflicts . One alternative is to change th location'of the building the ' � � wilding and, move the east access point as far north , as possible. Therefore, the a pp licant should be requited to provided a revised site plan which address the access issue. Recommendations: gg I I , PRIOR TO THE ISSU aNCE__. OF A BUILDINC PERMIT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISVIED OR VINANCIALLY StCURHD: 1. A revised site plan shall be submitted f or ap roval, through the City II Engineer, which address the location of the access point and minimizes the traffic conflicts , ' In addition, no direct access onto pacific f' Highway shall be permitted,. I I , I � I I f'. ri s\eti index\bdt93-7A;be I I II ENC INE1ERING C O MNlE111 S SDR �3 .a Ja E �T C r S 1 d • 1,,, .,..n..4 n,- ...u.... d,.r,._,-,nu .,.,..l..n..n,l ...�. ,,, ..l.l.u.,..............A -- „•I..al ..1,r„w 1......,-,.w.,....,w..r.u.,t,.,_r.-ln.rl.,..,,..n + ,.,.,.�..r............1».1«.....,. ,..wl.....,_..,..... ,..?.v,. ,,...A ..,A „.,.ti 4'.,. h......1 .. .. . .nn . 4„ • 1 I I • I I RE UEST FOR COMMENTS I I 1 TO: � DATE: April. 21, 199 I I I S FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: DEVELOPMENT q, for �!, SITE DEVELOPI�NT REVIEW SDR ..3-000 F CE 7 RAN SCHI PO (N #8 j A request fos. Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 5,000 square ;'; „ foot commercial retail building. APPLICASLE, REVIEW CItTERIA: Community P° • Development Code Chapters 18.62.050, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, I ' 18.114, 18.120, and 18.164. LOCATION: 11 '.11595 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 151. 36DB, tax lot 200) ZONE: C-G (General Commercial) The C-G zone allows public agency and, administrative services, public support facilities, professional and 'adraiistrative services, financial, insurance, and real 4,, estate services, business support services, and eating and drinking establishments among other uses. N I I I Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's ai' 'statement' for your review. I From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recoMmendation will be prepared decision thisla be rendered on pl elation, we the need your tr mite is by May future.1 If wish 1' • , � I pp � Y y �' 3, 993. You may � �� • us�e the ea provided esparate letter to your foo . a unable to,respond by the abovedate� p lease p hone the staff cntaCt noted below with your comments and confirm, your comments in writing as Noon as f Matter, contact the Tigard possible. If you have any questions regarding this matt I . Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Hlvd: Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT(: Victor Adonri I � , PLEASE CHEC K THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: �I I We have reviewed the proposal and have n o objections ill' i °t o u F Please contact of our office I 1 . Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Commentae I I I I 9 I I I I ti I I I I I I - I , I Name of Person Cbmmenting a I I I I Phone Hth ber: • • • I I II II 11 1 I I , I I I I I I I I I . I,I I I I I I I;; I I I , „ I I I I I I I I I I. I f I I I I I I I 1 ,, • . ,..»n. i.., ...,...I....,. ......a,. r .,..r+....,.._...,...,».. _, .__.,.....4.,,.«.. .r. .,, .,.....,.w..,.,..,.....,-..,....... T., r ..r...,.. .,......r......,,,..N:,.,_......-,.,....4._ .....,.µ........... ...a..._....,.,...,.. (r...,..M�.,,.,l.w ...... .«.Hm,,... f„T,:..e.,l.,..,....n....w �. I i ( I I i I i H T' CITY OF .TXG OREGON I m , Ma 11 �.9 9 3 MD �Tictor Adon.x a l Y I I . R v w En �.neer n e e 1 me t �"� hr�.s Davies De�v�e o �. f� � , SIR 9.3-0007 I i Description a . The applicant proposes to construct a' 5,000 square foot 'commercial: retail , . , building. Findiags M e 1.. STREETS ETS. The site is located on Highway 991 adjacent to the ,southwest corner l of Fred Meyers'; Highway 99 is under the I'jurisdiction`'of the Oregon �'I State Department of Transportation: The site was last used as: a gas' ' still n' site. There are two t- in is' st o s Watior�, the ex�sting build g existing' driveway' access pints . 1,) '1 the first ,being a shared , ' ingress/egress' With Fred Meyer,� on ,the southeast cor.nerlof the site ' ,' and 2) the other, being ,along', the frontage of ' the property and'. , , Highway �95 used on the app .'icants prelimi .. y p ans it is 'their y nar l intent to keep and maintain both access poinL•s: At the time of this report the Department of Transport anon had . not '' ''' submitted' Comments' to the City se i Bad on ,past decisions tle State will likely will looking for the following conditions 'of development. �,, e and that bein the i � � Only one access pointb�ez'ng kept open_d I existing shared a'cces's with Fred Meyers; 1 ' '. J • , 13:1 R.eplacemenL, of existing y,' curb and sidewa to 'meek State, I , stanaxds and G A Permit from the State t o perform wo r k Within the righ t . of-way. In corclusiond the appliCa n t should b e req uired t o meet t the� condit�ons of development a s 1w il� be re eat cd b the State. ii I �� SALT l'1`7aRY SF'WE'F,. i C 1 %'hhere is currently a servioe stub to the sight No addition'a'l •i faire im rb eirients •are re` d q I r ' '�1�TC T1 �EZ�G CaMMEi �� u SIR 9 3 7 �R��E SCZ r, I I �,H • I I i r t r , ,•.,.,. a«. A,. a—. w M. Nt.,,mr4. A .....,.. r.a-- - u. au.,-w... r,a ar.4 J_ -.wrw« d,nn. u i • • 3 . STORM SEWER: As mentioned above, the site had a ��service station located on it prior to this proposed use (the existing building is currently still was determined that on site) . After a field visit to the site it as e the site slopes towards Highway 99 and there is an existing storm drain line that connects to the public line located in Highway 99. The storm line located in Highway 99 is under the jurisdiction and. . • maintenance responsibility of the Oregon State Department of Transportation. Based on past use and the proposed use it does not appear that any additional storm water runoff will be created. � Therefore, no additional improvements are required. The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce (Resolution and Order No. 91-47) Surface. Water Management Regulations requiring the construction of on-site water quality facilities or fees in-lieu of their construction. Section 7.02 of the R&O states that: "The provisions of Chapter 7 shall apply to all activities which create new or additional impervious • surfaces. . . ". Since the intended use will not create an y new impervious surfaces this application is not required to install a on-site water quality facility or pay a fee in--lieu of construction. Recommendations: PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A FILDING PERMIT THE FOLLOWING. CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FT'TANCIAL*14Y SECURED: l A joint and Maintenance agreement shall be executed and recorded : ox t use a d d 7 for all' common'driveways. The agreement shall be referenced on and • ' become part of all applicable parcel Deeds The agreement shall be reviewed by the Engineering Department prior to recording. 1� 2 . The applicant shall obtain a p ermit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, to perform, work within the right-of-way of highway 99. A : Department. permit s copy of the perm shall be provided to the City Engineering 3. The applicant shall meet the requirements of the Oregon Department � of Transportation as it relates to the frontage of the site and the State right-of-way. APPROVED: Randall R. Woole , City Engineer n. eri ineor isdr93-07:ad ...»... ..,., ,-,„m,. ..wlr....A r.w.n......+...-....xf, x.. ..... .ar .r _...,.r-......r_. ..r..«.4r.....a.«i.1r..,w.....r......uN.... .4...N.V',.4 n+. 'I.l.w»....... .1. .. 'S„ ..4 .,wM ,<Jw.......rJ.._r.n..,..........M..J,..,.,..n...,. r.....,ry n...t .a. .4.+.+,..«...+...1 a...Hr,..+ »xl.-.I.win ILL.,.tmr.a.... { , I '1" n., 1 i. • ' NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION' , ° r DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST , II PO N J I r � FILE I ILE NO: o R 93-0007 I 1. I I . I I r APPLICANT: K e n &'Jerome Franceschi OWNER: SAME I 600 Third Street , I San 'rancisco, CA. 94107 I I 'REQUEST: AI re e®� f or Site' Development m en t R®v ew a P P io allow I construction of a I 000 9 are foot comm ercial retail. building�. APPLICABLE ,REVIEW CRITERIA. 'Community Development Code Section,, 18.62.050, I,r • 18.100, 184,102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120 and" 18.164.' , , , . I ' LOCATION: 11595 SW Pacific Highway. �(WCTM I� s1 36b0,, tax lot 200 ZONE: C-G (General Cors►mer cia l The General Commercial 'none . ', allow Public agency'and ,administrative I services, public ' I support fRCi it3es professional sionaZ and administrative services e s v f.ertan c i als insurance,' and real estate , I services, business support Services, eating and drinking , ,, . , „ r J ei tablislaments among other 'uses. ' 'Piease review the attached development proposal and comment on those items listed below Whi,Lh concern(s), this 1■TPO'`r e ardLn g ,this application, Ih�s listing i I about' this development taking, place `,in your portion o'£ the I i your review f this proposal., Please let tili it know how you feel'', Thank Yoi. . STAFF CONTACT: victor Adonri 6394171:' ' ' Access To and From Site I I i, Traffic Ithpact �� ghborhood Im P „ Env �ros eint it Impact COMMENT: ' , ' ille..., . 404,,l,„tc,,__L_4e_. , , , . , ,r,,,i,ui ... .s....'-'-tt- . _LA.- 'A.)0/"-' , ' , , , 1f f I • r I , i I j�. I I i r I, 1 I I I Lv0 CO�iMEIT I d la {�e. � �, , ,SieJ �' r I g • • I I I I I I I I' I I I I I I I I I 4 ,M1 AN r• . .r 1 i . •,.,, . . r..I.,n,_,..,..I.,.,...1,a...,„..,...ul;..,•.._...M.w.......u.a a.„,..,r..:l:... ,1. .._,...r,..,...w,...,-....:�,,.,... ,......::.w..«I.....,,....,. Ip J.,._. .1.,:,,..».,. • —•»,n.....,+.,.,:1.I,....u.+.«, a:..h.. w.4 m,..,a.n,:.....J-::..;,.0 ,.w•,.x,..l.. • x.. MRY' 04 93 13:20.,REGION 41 HWY, DIV r,w" �,t smitta memo��11 #o�D�a e�e • r, POstpd� brand fit ',.ran ! r. .. i , F Frown . ., ,1 #r oept� • i pima,1f : — r,• fax , , ' ' ' ' i -- AM r TO, ..AVei` ,.......' ,. .A . ,0 1 .D BE; Apo 1 2 . , ,m I ff I FE0P4. Ti and Planning Department I . . _ ... I SITE DEVELOPMENT vs n �o©te � NCBSCN1 4 t ?a A request �� r I sita Deuelopmaxt.��v ie� approval to alloy constr not i n of a 5,000 square, ` •foot commercial retail building, APPLI LE4 RivIEW CRITFRPP9.: tT%munity ' , r,, DeVeloprctent Code Chapters 18.62.050, 18.100, 16.102, 18.106, 18..108, , r I 18_1.14, ,1.8.1.20, ,and;18.164. LOCSATIoN: 11595 SW Pacific SighWray ( i'CT14 1151 N, ' 8 tiDB, ,,ta.x lot 200) ZONE: 'Cr-G (General Commercial) The C--d zone allows public agency. and administrative services, public support 'facilities, ° ' I professional and ad Ain&6trat ,Ve services, financial., insurance, and real. � . estate services, business support services, and, eating and drinking, I establishments t s �c n g other U@8- � � � I . t l I 1 A tt i s thy �it� P1�� a n d a 1icant s statement fog your, r e v i� , pr on I• rotation upplied 'by 'Va.rioua departments ,and agengies and from other , iatormati_on available to,our staff, a report and recomxnendati.on will be prepared , . and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. tf you wish H. to coMcen t ed we E � by 1998, •. a � . I uee the s pace pxovidbelow orattach'a e p arat ette o.r urn yo t comradenta� I • ' 'If you ate unable to res-ond b the above� dateA ,plear,e phone the staff l Contadt , tioted� below with your'I,.oammente and confit your l ook eats' in writing as Sido j 4$ ' I '' : . contact'� '� a Tigard d 1 possible. if you have and questions regarding this Matter, n ac h x g planning Departtnent ,13125 SW ,HaU. Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. &tICN 58,9. 4171. . STAFF'p CC �TA T iotox A c nri ' I , P �� t�CF�' T�lCB r�t�WINo I 1TE � �'��.A�'1''3�,.P�'!e'�I � � I , � I � ' ,1., I r�' I I, I I e hakereview�dtheaaooal and haveb ab�ccwi rtol 3t. I �.p . �la asecan e t i� � oarfc e. I 1 , Please, I e t r I '; refer to the eno�lQsed' 1 t . 1. • I Written Y( ry�TiLM •w I .___4.,,,, ,L_,,_... i,_4_.., 1, . i 4 ,�c I L I I ` w,`. w C" I , , I . I Az: - , , „,„„i -...„,,,,i+ ,.. ,,, ,, , , ,, ', H- , (5› 0 4--- .16„,,, , , , i. '1 a...� .: 011.. . c„ Naxtye Of I}erlaor Coiiiirier .i.hg � i .1*:� , . .>, Q e x b:' I: ''IC'''I r • I �1 + 1 I.A W Mu I l 1. w µ i I I /^� I I wIH' 7 4 a I I 1 i , I I t' I I I I I I. I NN y( I I 1 III L4-„,,,,-,5,,,',. .+»,.::..:»„ I t w» I I I I I . . f w•.,. .d..r...W.... A....«tau...ue,k. ! .... a...1,n. ,i,.,,... , ' r M 11.,. . ' 614),VA RECa�JEST FOR COMMENTS '190 `�" ��6 DATE: 4ri l 21, 1993 FROM: Tigard Planning Department • RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 93.--0007 FRANCESChI (NPO #8) A request for RE D3 � , � � Bite Developmen t Review approval to allow construction of a 5,000 square Boot commercial rebel]. building. I' APPLICAB E,REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.62.050, 18. 00, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, and 18.164. LOCATION: 115 5 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 151 • 36DB, tax lot 200) ZONE: C-G (General ,C+omrnercial) The C-G tone allows public agency and administrative services, public 'support facilities, • professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, and eating and drinking , establishments among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan ar an d applicant's s sta t emen t for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report, and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your `comments by May 3., 1993. You May /f :you .,are unable to res and b tp eC above datte le use the space provided below or attach separate letter to return your comments. '� .r... ,� y � e� please phone the staff contact • noted below with your comments and confirm your, comments in writing as soon as passible: If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13 ' g artment p . 125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97 223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Victor Adin,;� I I PLEAS E CHECK THE F OLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: r We have reviewed the proposal and have nu objections to it. our ofte�' � Please contact of c� r' ].G' Please refer to the enclosed letter. L I Written Comments: t , I , rr f S mmenting: .. . Name of Person Co Phone Number: I I i • r A r. ., .1.5.I r ,. ...tin.. ..,....1..1x,... ✓..A— ww«r...r..t m..... .,Ll.+.r! .au. .—..+. .. .. ' «,.w._r i,,. . ,.r,rw ...dAn r...,.IFM.«. n ..,«,.,....A...en+..,.,v« .,...1..-,««i.✓............ ....R..w,..«+«.Sl,.,w ..x «.,.... . .....«.. «....v .. YY' �yyy, 1 I 1 U I r r I k d I I • RE UE5T FOR COMMENTS GC, e IC DATE: April 21, 1993 FROM: Tigard Planning Department' . RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 93 000? �R�NC CHI (NPO #8) A request for Site Development„Review approval to allow construction of a 5,000 square foot commercial retail building. APPLICABLE, REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.82.050, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, and 18.164. LOCATION: 11595 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM IS1 36DB, tax lot 200) ZONE: C-G (General Commercial) The C-Gr'Izone allows I I public agency Y and administrative services, public support ort facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, « business support services, and eating and drinking ' establishments among other used.' II Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From pp b_ various departments and agencies and. from other information supplied by m oth inforMation'available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by May.3, 1993. You'may Use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to resporld by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments an Confirm your comments in writing as soon as p ossible. x f �o hav e any questions regarding ardin� thiS matter, contact the Tigard ard PHONE: 6394171. SW Hall 83.vd. Tigard,rd OR 9'�2 2 3. � Plannang Department, 13125 r g r I , STAFF CONTACT: Victor Adonri PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY. eAl We hays reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. r Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comtents: �. I , Nahie of Person Comm.enti ig^ -.. .� - z Phone Number '" t I i I I I I I I 1 I I I r 4. r I I I I r I I r I , pp, • I I. , I , RIa glgT FOR COMMENTS r , TO "!r ( '. DATE: A rii. 21 1993 -� FROM: Tigard Planning Department -000 FRAN�L�+CIi1 (NPO � £� �A request for � RE: S IT'E DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SD]F2 93 7 ( � � Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 5,000 ssquare ; foot commercial retail building. APPLICAJBLE,PE'VIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62.050, X.0.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.12.0, and 10.164. LOCATION: 11595 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM iS1' 36DB, tax lot 200) ZONE: C-.G (General Commercial) The C-G zone allows public agency and ladministrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, . business support cervices, and "eating and arinking, establishments among other uses r Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments, and agencies and :iron other an decision rendered ed en�th�s report proposal in the ion will be you formation available to our prepared' axt�A a d' will be a-ender p Po futures I u hrigh to comment) on this application, we need your comments by Maze , 1993. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. t_y,p_q _aac,e L.unab1e to . r re s p nd by tbe a»boe dater, p ieaae ph o ne the staff contact noted below with y r Gy mMentL and confirm your contents in writing as soon as possible.le. 1gy hs have a Y meat ion, regarding this mntt r� contact the Ti gard Planning De artnent, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 923. PROM: 69--417 . �. STAFF CONTACT: Victor Adonri PIKE CHECK THg FOLLOWXNG /TEMS THAT APPLY: I I We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. nl ; .» ...�..; Please contact of our office. I I Please refer to the enclosed letter. , I Written,T1 . tAQ t E : I � i • I I I , I w - 1 "J. L .yyy.MMMjIII �1y, jjJJ �..wl II1 Name of Person Comn ent .n -' (75 / a?''' 1 • . � �� Phone N� uber: I I S f I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I i I I , r r I 1. *IV fi. �I • ....,a....ti eh.., _I. ...,a,ie.,..,1,...i..«,.4«ut ..,i.W ....,.x .......,... r....0 ., ,« ., «r..- 1 _.. .1..N ...., _ .. . r...,. .,, ... .._. .. ..,.. Q , I I I , I I I 1 I r 1 I r hI _ BEQUEST FOR COMMENTS I I TO: DATE: _Anri3 21. .39 I , FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 93-0007 FRANCESCRI (NPO #8) A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 5,000 square foot commercial retail building. APPLICABLE, REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62.050, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18,114, 18.120, and 18.164. LOCATION: 11595 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM IS1 1 36DB, tax lot 200) ZONE: C-G (General Commercial) The C-G zone allows public agency and administrative 'services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real ° estate cervices, business support services,' and eating and drinking establishments among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From I information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other . information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared • and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your Comments by May 3, 1993. you may use the space provided below or attac h a separate letter to return your com m ents.� Y o are respond respondby_t11.9„Abaym_ILiataL p leas e phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm, your comments in writing as soon as l I �I possible. If 13125 SW Hall �31vdaar� g matter, contact the Tigard f you have any questions regarding this m contact ' Planning , Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. •' STAFF CONTACT: Victor for Aconr i PLkAaE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: I I II I , 'I I We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it ' I Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed' letter. Written Comments; � 11 ' "G k � $ ., , I Ir I , I I I I Name of Person Commenting: I I d I I �h n e Number: I ' I I II I I I r I I I I. r I I I I I' I I • :.r, ., ,,..., d ,...r i .; .i, • ...to n '' .1 a a lrw, a {},; RECEIVED PLANNING • • APR 27199 Bpsaa ST FOR 'COMMENTS TO: ' Qi 4 �a •- T DA'TS : 1�.pri 21, 9�?3 FROM: Tigard Planning. Department I I I I RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 93-0007 FRANCESCH. (NPO #8) " A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 5,000 square foot commercial 'retail building. APPLICABLE,REVI;EW CRITERIA: Community • • Development, Code'Chapters 18.62.050, 18.1000 18.102, 18.106, 18.108,' 18.114, 18. :120, and 18.164. LOCATION 11595 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 151 �'I I w 36DB, tax lot 200) ZONE: C-G (General Commercial) The C-4 zone allows' public agency and administrative services, public support f,acilitiee, • professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate :services, business support Services; and eating and drinking establishments 'among other. ;uses. I I Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's' statement for 'your review. From information supplied by various'll departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation Will be prepared will be rendered on the near f reS you w' and a decision wi.l .. proposal in the future. If Y wish to comment on this application, we need your comments byl May 3, 1993. " 'you May I use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. 7Cf you are unable to '.respond by the abolre date,, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon ds ..• I I possible.De ar�m ��V�.ave any �e��z1 'rgarTiga�dhia m97228 97223. contact . the Tigard • ossible. If g ontact , 6 Planning p , � 13125� SW Blvd., OR 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Vict©r 'Adonrn . • • ' PLEASE CHECK Trik FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: W reviewed the ro have no objections to itl We� have revs proposal��arld �ha � a.o Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter, I Written Comtrients. • I « I �y �y1 t'arle of Person r;onirilenting: ,ZZZLi /049'41 ,� , I I A Phonc Nutttber: Z tr a P., I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I li I I � I I St I I I I I I , II r I I I .. • • i .,.,.+J«,,........�..a., .,,..,,... .«........ ..,,�..-,.�..«.,..�.w.Mw,._..,.-_., ._, ....: H-..�_. ..,. , '246 NE 17th Avenue . Portland', C)1, 9 721 2 9.5043 • , a • _ i a • 'E A.NSMITTA�.. ' ' Jeffery Offer' City of Tigard f , x.3125 SW Mall Boulevard , Tigard, OR 97223, ; I ' ' 'Date: June l ' 1933 I • I � 1,;1 ' .TR �SMITTED» Ono'Copy of Tracm act Axal sis fie oror he x 19Ste i ,r avay Red ail xern Tigard Oregon.p •• •• 4 COMME S: Co ies.have been distributed to Sam 11'''uniaidi of the Oregon ! p . m you have questions or. I3o art' eyit; of Transportation,',..If comments please)contact irie� ' , ., ti , t. as I 4^ i I I' i I, . . , J'' b I • • • • • • • ......, _.u....-n,�l. ,x... I.,:,.„I._ _» :.1.1..�,.. ,..,.. �.:.,,.., ...- ..... ..... ....._ .,. r. .,r...a....,.,.,,. ».,... ..a._.-,.. ,.....__.. a.-........a........«....�.. ,....w.,r....M.�u.,...�c,i:...,. .nA'r...l. ..,_ I I • f • II' • I g TRAFFIC IMPACT I I I for the • • ' A 77 • I I 0 11595 1 PACIFIC HIGHWAY � '� � 1 I I I .I RETAIL DEVELOPMENT r i I I I I . I I I I • Tigard; Oregon , . l• • • , I' • 1 • I • }`y1 I ` I • is •• I y I, I : I I I I ' I y I Prepared for: • y t. France ach P z 'ro ert1F • 600 Third Street p I I 1 San Francisco, CA ,I • I m I i • 1!. r I E• ,..�,y �r • Er Y U:,.' y 9�. 111 4 • II I re ar'ed b� I t. Douglas B. McCoy. , P E, +�-� i 2146 NEE,•.'i 17th Avenue l>�, I Portland, Oregon 97212 r • (503) 249-5043 II LU • a I I I I I I I I I I?' 'I : I �. 93 I I • I I I I Project No.: 205.00 , I I • 1 I I I , , I I' I . • I • I I I I, II I i' E • • : I I II I• { • • • • I { I I 1� i I I I 1, . I I • ,,, , b _ I 1; I 1 , f- I 11595 z s95 SW Pacific Highway Retail Deuelagz»tent Tigard, Oregon f` 1 „ .. 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 c . I 1 1 1 • 1 , 1 1 .,. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 1 I • I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 INTRODUCTION • • • • • • ♦ • ♦ s,• • • f • 4� • • i • • • . • i 1 • ♦ • ♦ f • • 4 •, f i f o'4 •'i j 1 SCOPE OF REPORT 'P IOJEC T STUDY)Y AREA 1, I SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS FINDINGS 1 1 E)C...I STING CONDITIONS . , : i i . . J'• 4 i i . . i . Y :�,• . . i . i i i ':, 4 1, SITE CONDITIONS AND ADJACENT LAND USES 1 TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES . TRAFFIC VOv 1 JM:�S AND PEAK HOUR OPERATIONS 1 �� ACCIDENT HISTORY , ;, ,, 1 ' I 1 .I I 1 1 TRyp{p©gyp�+i' /Jy�� ■/y yy (d�pp�Ny�ryy T,�+�y LiAI IC'�IMIJ..Y.ACT AN`.I• SIS,' . . . • i • 4 4.4 4 4 i t i 4 i Y 4 Y,i 'i e • 4 i i 1'4 4,4 i 1 1 • • 4 '. 121 1 1;, /1+' " : DEVELOPMENT PLAIN' 1 TRIP CxENI;RATICDN I ;z TRIP DISTRIBUTION'MW ASSIGNMENT FUTURE TRAFFIC O II RATIO N IIE E IS Or SERVICE 1 r SITE ACCESS CONSIDERATIONS 1 i 1 AO i Ii S i ii—L � i:D TI : e70 i'4' i' 4 4 4 4 • i Y' 4 4 4 4 Y I 6 4 • 4'1 i N • i Y • i i • • I�Kai 11 i ' I ... i rEREd.\CJL:S 4 4 5 4 4 4 6 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 5 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4,5 • 4, 4 4 5 4 6 4'4 i . - I '. 4 4 i Y u 4 it 22 I . 1 i 4 N 4 1 � I ((�y�ye 7�.••��••�� •KxT ((� LEVEL trH�� •�ry��-[i��/�••�� +�M.�' y{�y; y-�. •}�• �/^�e rw� � 4 4.c � I i t.,. lbir�d:.l �da..d,1i '',�'L"S.S..4�V�+a:�:1.:1 �1J� I.I��+• N 4�4�Y 4 Y,4 4 e'J R�4 4'r 1, 4 4 4 • [J 1 i • " A JI..LI.L V JV DC.L 4 LEVEL Oi' SERVICE `1'ORItSJ.li:ETS 4 Y 4 4'4 4 '. 4'• . 4 Y Y Y 1 Y�4 4 4 i i Y 28 M., I I I 1 I 1 1 d$ 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 i II � 1 i lMi1 1 p • I ,s I 11595 SW Pacific Highway Retail Development--Tigard, Oregon , a. LIST OF FIGURES I , I 1. Site Vicinity Map .. . . ... . ... . . . . . . . . . ... ....... . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . 4• 2. Site T a n y . . i . • . • • ♦ . i . • • . .I. i •1• . . . . . • • . . • . . • . • ♦ • • • . • ♦ • • • • . • . V , 3. Site Vicinity Land-use, Access and Existing Traffic Volumes . . 7 , • �. 4. Site Access Alternatives . . 18• i i rr .• .. / . I , II, I i I a I i I I, I I , I i I I i I I i • I i . ' ' 1 I , I � � I i , o I I , r i R + • n I 1 i I rd .. �, { O I I I I +, t,..�,.,' ,,.,'w �..,.,,... .I.,,,..,.�.. .u.,�'. .�..,,, '! w.�,,,, ........�....,�.. ..� ..., ,..,, .,. ,. ,. .,, ....• .��...... - ..x. ... .. ,.,, ., ..,..I ,II a .a��.l I ...... i ..� � � � � � by b� wl q , v 1 • .r I I I I III 11195 SW Pacific Highway Retail Deyellopsnent--Tigard, Oregon I I I I I I I LIST OF TABLES I I I I I • r FA I 'x Peak Hour L•O.5. i 1 Y • • 4. ♦ i Y • • • 1 Y ♦ • • 10 I ^ I 2; Accident Data Summa'x • • • : . • i i I I I , 3. Proposed Development T r i p Generation ` . ' a . . . . . ♦ . • . : . . • ♦ . • 15 44 Total Pins Project A.M.l 'eat Ho ii,lL.O.S• I. • . : , . . • i . • . i ♦ e i : . 17 A-1. L.O.S. Definitions for I I I Signa.xzed Intersections . • I • ♦ . • ♦ • . . • 24 w A-2. L.O.S. Criteria for Signalized Intersect9 s • : ♦ r♦ . . JwI A-3. ' Descriptions for �.Tnsignahzed Intersections c • , . • . . . • A-4. 14.0.S. Criteria for Upisignalxzeci.Intersection . , : i • , . ♦ . . . , . . . . . i . . ♦ , 27 I I I I I I I I , I 1 r' e' r I I I lal I II I I I I . / r I I I III ii i II I i I Y I I I I I I I ' I I I I III • I ,w ■ 1 . i r. .�.. ..r 1.Lx r ........ .w..4A . I.-. »....... A..u...t .1 J., ....Y...+.....�.�...._.... r.�. ..fin.....�..,� ..,... IL_-..�-«_...... d.,J4...r�r, -.. .�....i.. ..r 4.....».r.-....r..... •. re -„-, �.,.... r...1nL x.,« .. i ..... I 1159 5 SW Pa ca c Highway R etacl Development T i gand Oregon I I r 1 INTRODUCTION I r I II SCOPE OF THE REPOR'T'. • I • This traffic impact analysis report, has been prepared to analyze and evaluate the traffic impact associated with the proposed retail develo 'ment located at 11595 SW Pacific p P p P Highway in Tigard, Oregon. The development is to be located on the west side of SW L, Pacific shows a site th Avenue. Figure 1 s o I'��cif�.c Highway (Highway 99) and north of SW 7� gu . vicinity map for the proposed development! Figure 2 displays a silo plan for the project.. . II Specific traffic related issues discussed s ed in this report oil include: L. , Existing land use and traffic conditions. r I. I r Trip characteristic estimates for the development of the site! r �I w I i ! • The traffic impact of the proposed. development during the peak period at the ,site P p pl �' . � driveways) 1 r I I �� I • Safety and operational characteristics cterislzcs of alternative access schemes, I I II r I I ,I 131tOJECT DESCi.tIPTIO II I r .�_ The 11595 SW Pacific Highway g h�a� re tai l development 1 consist Est of a p p row to ly 5 y 0 0 square feet of leasable retail! The project is to be constructed in a single phase and is 1 to in the r scheduled. to be coanple Fall of 1993! I I I I I p�. I r that retail develop ment It ise� e the development by a retail furniture II However since this 1� I outlet currently occupying space in an adjacent shopping center. However, I I I I I I I I I r � I n V l/ 1 • I I. � ill �� i � � I � I J, r1 I I r I' ill I, I I r , «a t fig GG I J Ar��.r l • I , ry' s 11596 SW Pacific Highway Retail Developmeni—Tigard, Oregon . mil tenant has not been officially confirmed, this analysis will assume a range of general retail uses in evaluating the,proposed site development,' IAccess to the site is planned via a rimary driveway'onto Pacific Highway and a i . secondary driveway into the parking lot of the adjacent shopping center. Thirteen. ' parking spaces will be provided for the development. � I I 11 a I • :r t I SUMMAIrir OF ANALYSIS FINDINGS • The following paragraphs summarize the major findings of the study. The findings are broken down into Y a) summary of traffic I two parts: sti.�nm the analysis methodology; and �b) the . general impact analysis conclusions and recommendations. Traffic.A nalygis Methodology • h remainder r of �. n. hour. For the e ainde t All analyses are based on the evening pear, o o the f da y or the week, total tr affc demands ar e likely to be less than is indicated 1 in this,report,p I � . I I I I I i • • �� • � �The analysis assumes no reduction in vehicle trips as a result of transit. The site, however, by transit, likely hat � � � � � � site, will be�served� t sz and it is y some site generated trips,will arrive and depart via transit I • The analysis assumes no reduction in vehicle trips as a result of pedestria .. • I o:r I blc y cle trips t� and�r o� the site,e� Given the ro xim itI y of the site to i ; , nearby residential areas, iY t is likely that some tips to and from the site will be made via these modes • I I II I I I I I I • I I • � I �� iy I 7 ,yi ,f I 1 I i I ' ��ff . . • '! � ,...n...11..a.,..,..,n i1 I,nr...,. .,,,.. n �,.Is...,fn.l.s ..u1.• ... 1 u I.s�... �...s...,.,... ..� • 11595 SW Pacific Highway Retail Development t Tigard, Oregon •, The Analysis assumes full build of the site including 5,000 square feet of 1; leasable retail. Findings &Recommendations ti • The proposed retail development i pment s expected to generate at most • approximately 30 evening peak hour trips. • The addition tior o site traffic on 1993 background traffic fic levels will have e a n ' negligible impact on study area intersections and roadway segrnerits. All site driveways were found to operate at acceptable levels of service under full.build conditions, e Site bi access limited only to the Fred Meyer Retail Center shared access . driveway maidmizes the potential frequency and severity of'conflicts between vehicles attempting to access abutting properties and vehicles ' attempting to travel through on S W Pacific Highway, 4 I I The provision of direct site access to Pacific Highway mYxx mazes conflicts, t' ls .L� increases the efficiency,�. of a pare�on f a. nd provides d es t he highest es t d agree o f safety under prevailing conditions: u • I I I' I I,. I , II , }} I I • I i A I I • , I I ' � I I 4•••• � • , S'. ' y . • 1 1 1 I s r IIII' ' 9 ' , t I W 1�' .i it', ' / ; I I I , I I IN i t, I I r I I I II I I I 1_, I I , I • I ■ c , i, 1 ' , , I I 11 1 , F i 1 I , $ ; I 11 I I • I I, I I I I I I I I I I , H I I I' I I I I I r I I I I I ' cal 8ve ci� I I I I I , I I L. f.' I wI lii , r I A • 1. r ....._______. _ - 4._ ' 4 �� i , . ,. ...i .. ? , .:. 1 1 .::.:, . 1 1 I t %... ' C. \ .,• • 1 9,- \\\S . , 1 1 t.. 1 '4-,,, i wO - .. 4.d.it. , 1., , 1 1 '', , ':,`..;:. c:t 6 . i ' `A4, ' r � r' 1• i'' , i ‘..■ICI' , ,.. 1 i 4 1 k I.:4, 1117ce _:',:4"*:':::', ..,41., .: N''''''''' 1 . r t 1 'J i',i '�1,'l u,. 4.4..,‘,.,.0,' ` \, I . 1 .,10:,::',' //cl.s, d .. 1 ,•i`;"'i• ��i'i. Y 'i.,) I''�G //.111 ///'�� ' .1:. .+d', F . w J i 4r �. 'i ti 'F I ft r,...,..,,,,, Y I s,: t. I 1 1 1 1 I i r I , lititii p I ..' I 1 r+ i 5 , I ii4 .4.-Q 1 I I „'. I I I •, I i 1 I b r I I r I , 'I I, � I I 1 I I I I I I I I TS DEVELOPMENT PLAN r ��5�5 SW Pacific Highway wa . r 1 I. I r 1 1 I I I I I' 1 • 11595 SW Pacific Highway Retail,Dedelopmeni hh Tigard,Oregon EXISTING CONDITIONS SITE CONDITIONS AND ADJACENT LAND USE • The project site lies west of SW Pacific Highway and north of 74th Avenue, The site is t within the boundaries of the City of Tigard, Oregon. The property previously contained a , auto service station but is now currently vacant. The site is zoned for retail development. Land u ses along both sides of Pacific Highway in the vicinity of the site is commercial. Directly adjacent and north. of the site is a Fred Meyer Retail Center which includes a full service Fred Meyer store as well as a number of small specialty retail shops and a Les Schwab Tire Center. Figure 3 illustrates the site; • � illustrates vicinity land, • I I . TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES • I I I I I SW Pacific Highway (Highway 99) is a State of Oregon operated and maintained facility. : Pacific Highway serves as a major north/south arterial through the City of Tigard, connecting Interstate 5 and the City of Portland to the north with Highway 217 and the I , City of'Tigard rd.to the south. I I I I � SW P cifc Highway is a "��Statewide Highway' under the State's Level of Importance (LO1) policy(Ref cae nce 1), The mina ge��nt objective for Statewide Highways is to �� • provide for safe and efficient high-speed continuous flow operation in rural areas and high to moderate-speed: operations in urban urbanizing areas The level of service .� s ri and� : I , 'I standards for w ide tar` �fatew 'Highways y targets a level of service "D" for design hour operatixlg (, . conditions th r oug h a year horizon: • 1. . xtgting oft 10h8 I r I I I dl II I � I , I I I I P �v J • )a _ - . !l�f• .m...--..- - =e-- ,--....-. yam.... .r-�.�,--- CO , 4(„I ew� j t Fred Meyer � Retail ff t - - e,ce Meyer store - � 9 Access - P� �� ec� �a _ , . A I- (\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ 4',_, L , ......, Reta-, ii / 1 il ____® , '-‘4.1 411r SW Pacific Hwy = S Villa.Ridge m 7 - c.. > / 95 . o 5.90 - 4' 192 _ ' 1 To Tigard - SITE S�, Cinemas - FIGURE - - - - _ ACCESS & EXISTING PM 1 1595 sli TifiRAc Highway 3 Retail Development . I I I' I II I I I , 11595 SW Pacific Highway Retail Development—Tigard,Oregon I I i Under the State's Highway Access Management policy (Reference 1), SW Pacific Highway • . wogldl i likely categorized a Category 4 fa facility. The policy states that Category ory 4 ,r I Y Y high facilities should provide)for efficient and safe medi`una to high speed and medium to high '. volume traffic movements. Category 4 facilities are appropriate for routes passing' through areas areas which h hav ve moderate de aendence on the highway to serve land access • I , As shown in Figure 3, SW Pacific Highway in the vicinity of the site has two lanes in each , ' direction with a continuous left turn refuge lane, The proposed�s4,,te is currently served by two access driveways, including one access driveway �� r including �s drivewa� �directly to Pacific Highway and one ; ,• Y • access driveway into the adjacent Fred Meyer)Retail Center. Both access driveways are 1 I. I uni� h zeY I I . , . Approximately 400 feet to the north of the proposed a.te is.the signalize intersection of I i ; • ._ , the Fred Meyer Retail Center's s o ruxmai access driveway wI i.th.SW Pacific Highway. I i, the si al zed intersection r ellsite s o��o south of the s io A ro.�i,raalel 250 feet to the soot, �' � p r serving the Cinemas, This intersection includes a southbound o and� ughan eY I ,1:: '— Pedestrian, Bicycle and Transit 'acilit ie ' . I , SW Pacific Highway, in the Nri.cinity of the site, has developed pedestrian sidewalks, As . part of the site development,;a sidewalk will he provided adjacent to the site, The j1 ,. Y i Y north and south of site provides safe and efficient pedestrian ,.�,, � � � signalized intersections no a � I street crossings, Iri-Me t opera es a bus ne that directly serves the proposed)retail develop nent (Weferencti L . 2). The 1Vunbe r 12 Sher ooc bus line operates o along SW,Parifi c ��ghway. The Number ' 12 line operates with approxxmately 30 X ' to headway's during weekd ay peak periods, r�II •• ' SW Pacific Highway adjacent to the site has no developed bike lanes, .. II I I Existing I ton9 i• I I I , I I I I I I 11 I r I „ I i , I. { C r . 1 • .11595 SW Pacific Highway Retail Development.-Tigard,'Oregon. PLANNED TRANSPORTATION II PR VE lENTS There is currently a major transportation project in the vicinity of the proposed site SW . 72nd Avenue (as shown in Figure 3) is to be realigned and connected directly to SW y Pacific Highway at the existing signalized intersection of the main Fred Meyer Retail I ' Center driveway. Construction of this improvement is currently underway. • TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND PEAK HOUR OPERATION Site* the weekday p,m. peak hour is the time when the greatest total traffic demand is placed on the surrounding street system, this was the time period used in the analysis of the site development. Current evening peak hour traffic volumes counts were conducted in May of 1993. Current traffic volumes are shown in Figure 5, Existing Level of► ervice u Level of Service (LOS) is a concept developed to quantify the degree of comfort(including such elements as travel, time, number of stops, total amount of stopped delay, and other . impediments caused by vehicles) afforded to drivers as they travel through an intersection i or roadway �egaent� The 1985 Highway Capacity Manual (Reference 3) includes a detailed methodology for calculating the LOS at both signalized and unsignalized ,... intersections Generally, LOS for signalized intersections is based on the average stopped delay per ' " • vehicle. The calculation of LOS at an unsignalized intersection require s a different ' e upon the concept "Reserve Capacity" (i.e., approach. At these locations, LOS is based up � o� l�,e ry i . . � The reserve capacity. , that portion of the available hourly capacity that is not used �� !� / concept applies only to an individual trafc rnovemerLt ox share d� movements,�e 0' the capacity of all they inc%vidual movements has been calculated and their LOS and' � expected delays determined, an, overall evaluation of the intersection can be made. oi izstt.iTi ore t 'ITZIS i ' � I • I ''.: 11595 SW Pacific Highway Retail Development--Tigard, Oregon . Normally the movement having the worst LOS defines the overall evaluation' but this , , y may be tempered by engineering judgement. A more detailed explanation of the concept .. ,,„:.r1,.i of LOS is provided in Appendix A. I. Fable 1 identifies the results of thellevel of service results for existing peak hour , aconditions at the intersection of the shared access Fred Meyer Retail Center driveway ' with SW Fac�"xc Highway, As sho�na.in.the table, the intersection is currently operating at Level of Service "D". " Table 1 Existing Peak Hour LOS ' . • X nt s er e do C-n Sa na,zzed c , • ' .,. Reserve Capacity (Shared Minor Movement) , .: ':,4 1 _ __. , . SW Pacific Hwy/Shared Fred 143 � Meyer Retail Center Access , ` ACCIDENT HISTORY • A review was conducted of the 1987 through 1991 accident history on SW Pacific Highway . in the project vacuity. Typically, accident rates are calculated as a rate per million vehicle i c le miles of travel (1Vindividual;�for woad c These rate s a e than 1 compared with statewi de or local averages of similar ar roadways alv ays o t intersection tI o identify e �t%�y traffic bafety problem areas: , 1¢ Table 2 shows 8W Pacific Highway' accident rates for th e 1.04 mile long roadway Na section in the vicinity of the proposed retail development as reported vx �re��, State Accident . i I t • • 4' Y • I • 11595 SW Pacific Highway Retail Development Tigard, Oregon r. Siinimaries (Reference 4). Accident rates depicted in the table are generally consistent i 1 • with slxni1 a roadways sections and intersection wi.thm the statewide system.. 1 } I I I I .I Table 2 n Accident Rates ' I I I I I I I I I SV Pacific �, �w a y, • • I � I Tigard Boundary to Beaverton-Tigard. Highway 1 1 II I I I r I Total I I Segment .dotal AST A�,c�dent Rates I I y Length Acc's, 1991 1 00 1989 1 8 �0 � 7 I . r ' I1.04 64 45,550 3.70 4.76 4.56 3,32 3,3 r I " I I III The acoi.d,ent rate of 3,70 for 1991 is coni.parabie to the Statewide average of 3.36 for lvirban non-freeway roadways. I II I r I I ,• • t I I� • 1 I I I I 1' I . rr I I I I ■ » C I I I 1 I I, fI I I A I I I I 1 'I I I I I I I i i I. I I I t I •� 11 i. 1 I 1 r' I ' I 1-r } �7 �Y ��^�" yVsma-��V 1 I . I l,. , p I • f •n, I I I I 1, I i Il I I I I' I r 1 lq, .. r • Retail • • • . � •� 11595 SV�.1°aCiJic Highway h Development--Tigard, Oregon. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS • i Th e impact of the proposed retail development was analyzed as follows: size The sr�e anal placement�. lae etofth proposed'-- the o 1 osed deve o went was confirmed. �. d. { a 0 The total runber of e�e evening hour trips were estimated for full build f the develo xi lent. p �.� Trip distribution of site g, y ier .ted traffic for the development based on the location: of the site relative to major population centers, the transportation �• I s network, and the current directional flow of traffa.c; j`,. Site generated traffic for evening peak periods were assigned to the street system, and added to the existing background traffic volumes, Vl I Lerel of service analyses for the exsting plus p ro j ect traffic condi tions were prepared for the intersections of the site driveways with SW,Pacific Highway, 'I r Site access alternatives were evaluated for operational and safety concerns. • I I ' A detailed discussion of the methodology snmxmari��s above, and the analysis• gY d an�.lys results, is contained in the remainder of this section; • I • R . • I i r � I I iii i I II r • Y 'I I 1 � I 11595 W Pacific Highway Retail Development — Tigard Oregon DEVEL PLANS I I I , I I I f As stated in the previous sections, the proposed project consists of 5,000 square feet retail development to be constructed in a single phase. The development is to be located north and west of SW I Pacific Highway near S 74th Avenue in Tigard,n, d Oregon.e g o n: �s ' S J illustrated in Figures 2 and 3, access to the site is proposed via a direct primary access 1 . driveway to SW Pacific Highway and a secondary access to the adjacent Fred Meyer f Retail Center. t I � SITE GENERATED TEA FIC VOLUMES Estimates of total weekday daily and evening peak hour vehicle trip ends for proposed ti • rr g pl the p o Deed retail development were developed from empirical observations at other retail locations throughout the United States. These observations are summarized in a standard reference imanua.' titled Trip Generation, 5th ]Edition., p'ublisl-ed.bj the'Institute of Transportation Engineers (Reference 5), There are three basic types of trips'made to'a ++� retail center: • l,, Drop-in Drips -- These trips already exi.st on the roadways that provide primary g purpose other than visiting the i ' • access 'tot e center and, are being made for some ux oche facility (for example, work-to-home), Drop-in trips do not result in any increase in background traffic volumes within the study area In fact, the o. y imp t of these drop in trips occurs at the site driveways, where they become turning movements: " fore, drop-in trips have no additional the 'I'p.ere pw' .:p : a1 e�'e�t on the road system beyond,th . • • I , development's driveways. 2► Diverted Trips - These trips are currently being dram to other commercial '. . i compete with the proposed facility, but are redirected activities that camp � � � I ' �? p v�� ted to the new facility opens. This redirection usually occurs because an improvement in ..� when it a ens. Tbxs redz I I I I I . I 1 I I I I : 4. -7 _ . ra... e ... ct a lysi8 I I, I III ' I... Ir l i a • I II r I I . I II I I I I I I I I I V, • 1 • • • I , , 115 95 SW Pacific Highway Retail Development-.Tigard, Oregon A convenience and proximity for the affected drivers. Diverted trips wi11 result in an i increase in traffic volumes within the immediate vicinity of the site, but will also , . result le 11 a decrease eer I e I ane Yn traffic volumes a t other l ocatiaI ns within thxn t e area (i.e., in II 1 areas where they used to shop). Therefore, this component of the total generated , I demand causes no change in the total number per of vehicle trips s wii-hin h r t e area, even ' . I t h o u g h I x t mI a add I to the n �m bar of trips within the ixnmediate vicinity nity of the site. a • I Another side benefit is ' I t hat'b divertin g, these trips often cause a'net reduction • I I total vehicle miles traveled on the areas transportation system. This is a common II observation.,. . , I sen se sinte it is difficult to imagine may a drivers would divert rt lo a I r new retail center in order to travel a greater distance than they did previously. ,' �I I I • • I I I I 3. New Trips --.I These retail trips would not have been made without the existence of the proposed facility. trip �p Therefore, this is the only tri type that results in an increase in the total number of trips made within the area These are also the only trips that represent additional vehicle miles of travel on the transportation system. , Past studies of local serving retail centers have found as few roadway ' ae. one quarI ter of p.m i pea k I I I I , . hour trips were new traffic on the network, Typically, i0-60 percent or more of 1 this size comes already passing by the site. Fo traffic to a retail center of t � m.es from. vehicles`�.rea For this study, since the proposed development is only 5,000 square feet, it was assumed that ) A none of the p m. peak h o ur traffic generated by the retail ortion of the development • came from traffic alread y passing by the site This assumption on r oxides a mor e conservative analysis with a higher num � number of new trips. I I , I I I j I I As stated previously,I it x s likely that the proposed eta xl deve I development will be occupied by outlet currently'occupying space 1 the a i a retail furniture y � pYY �' pace ii Ih �I adjacent shopping centers 'II . 1 •�; However,ver; spce this tenant has not been officially canfarmeo., this analysis will assume • reasonably high trip pl generating tenant in evaluating g the proposed sit e development. 1 I I • I I II I I I I ,I I I I I , TTflmna3�' �` I 44' n A' I I , I I I I I I I 1 I e I q� I " I I 21595 SW Pacific Highway Retail Development Tigard, Oregon Table 3 displays the estimated trips generated by 5;000 square ofdevelopment under I. .' @ it + 9 I • I • a number of commercial uses I .. f I I Trip Generation 5,000 Square Feet General Commercial Uses �I • I I . .� Land-Use 'Daily Trips RAM. Peak Hour Trips • t I I I I �'tirx�rture Store 25 " I w Auto Care N. 15 (R 1 " ...A festaurant 480 $0 � I � � � � � Hardware/Paint 255 Medical/Dental ' 7nt 5 d e ar ax /P � o I l 0 � . � W ; .. Specialty Retail 200 , I I General,'Office 125 I I ' .:... Based on�t�evalues' � pl� displayed in table 3, level of servic e e a�a ly��s��con tat contained m this repo' . wil l, a � �vo that the site generates 30 ,ms peak hour trip s (50 percent a�50 percent I tl , • , y proposed,��•' r.. I I� . out) Thirty p,�..�peak hour trips Irepresents��.reasonably high trip rate fox. the p p - �� • development. I . Ji:.lh DISTRIBUTION , � .I For t�e p purpose of t�us ana lysis,lysx�� it is assumed t at �.pp xo x�.mat e �� p e rcent of sit e t raic , . , is arriving to and from the north and 50 perce n�`to� .d fr from the south on SW Pacific H hway, I . I I I I I - U I, I I ',I I I I " r r I I I , I , I I I I I ;, I I. I , r I I I , I' I I I � I k n I, s t 4: 11595 SW Pacific Highway R e l Development w�� and D re g n n. __ k A.'"'��; i Of 30 p m, peak hour trips, it is assumed hat 15 will be entering the site and 15 ' exiting the site. Because the signalized intersection to the south of the site provides a ti ,• simple and safe way for vehicle to turn north via a jughandle (see Figure 3),,it is assumed that all 15 egress trips will turn right on to Pacific Highway, In addition, it is assumed 1 • that of the 15 ingress trips, half wil l t urn right t; t o the site from the north and half will � �; , I i turn left into the site from the south. . FUTURE E TRAFFIC OPERATIONS/LEVEL OF SERVICE TJsing the estimated trip,distribution pattern, the traffic anticipated to be generated by the development during weekday evening peak period was assigned to the access 1 driveways under two scenarios, !.• 1) All site generated trips were assigned to the shared access Fred Meyer Retail Center/Pacific Highway driveway; r.: - - ,) All site generated trips were assigned to the dedicated site driveway directly to SW ; , Pacific Highway two scenarios represent the maximum potential I Theses p ��impact�to either��access scenar�,o. � � The existing traffic volumes identified in Figure'3 were then adjusted to reflect the erect of new trip s, , . driveways �� ' Level of service analyses ses were conducted for the site the conditions , :* described aboves As indicated in FT able �; the shared a ccess driveway veway will continue ue to ' ' , '• operate at acceptable levels under existing plus project volumes. 1 11r The dedicated site'dr.veway will o era.te at an acce table level .finder fill b nditi , � � u.�d�o ons. �,. he ed capaerty reported rn the tab ost al egr � reserv� 1+��reflects thatalxri l ess�trac enters ; � SW Pacific Highway wad a right t turning movement in order to acces s p oint either er � �th ,Il . i .. (M... 4 , Il .' 1. d Y• 1 4 I. ; . , .. , • 11695 SW Pacific Hig1hway Retail Development Tigard, Oregon, or north via the ju•ghandle intersection directly to the south of the site (see Figure 3). j • II This conclusion is supported by field observations of existing conditions. '{, . PP Y g I I I I I � I I • Y N.� r. . I I Fable '' 1 Existing Plus Project Traffic��"eak, flour LOS Intersection Un Si nalized • Reserve Capacity 1,0.S: , • ' I I (Shared Minor Movement)' I I I SW Paci±c fly/Shared)Fred 126 D 1 Meyer ' Center Access I Retail Ce e I Dedicated I Site Driveway 386 P I ; Y• . f'^' •• Sri .ii •'t N: SITE ACCESS A r CRNATI1J I, Ili' , As stated before, SW Pacific Highway in the vicinity of the,site is c1assilied as a , ',' `Statewide Highway"" in.the Oregon Highway hwa Plan, As such, limited l access control is • , desirable in helping to achieve and maintain the highways rim�Y function., Thus,T hus, �hen � j 1 . ; reasonable al t ern a t i ve access is available, it is often desirable and necessary to close or to • • # modify redundant or unnecessary access;) Therefore, for the purpose of analyzing the I proposed°development, this analysis will evaluate two access alterna.tives, Access � ` Alternative "A" assumes that the site is served only via the shared access to the Fred II II Meyer Retail Center,`Access Alternative "B" assumes the site is served via a dedicated i access driveway directly to SW Pacific Highway. Both access schemes are shown.in Figure 4� r I, I I I I I • I I. I I I 1• r T4 I � � i i � � � � � I � i I IY I . ry .i1 ,, I I ra c Yii,paG�t ►"lea ys�S i iii � I I I Ili' ,Ili I�� I I I I I i I I' I I,. I • I , I � , I i I I • I h r 6 • I , I . I I I i I ■ _` .. I I , SW Pacific Hwy • I N I .. _r II OMD Ciai) crE) i. ° ... ___..... . I rr_r , ��ti � 'tr. I „ I ., .-- / q . 44-- ''` / " ` .-..........,..„....(..0) A/ -------''''S''''''''''' • • f. I. r I { li Y• ' Proposed 1 Retail Building SW I I I I I I .. I I I '�W Pacific Hwy t • •. 7 r 4 w_I wr. ,r..� r L_.__r 4.w...'W r r r r_r.r w.w.r r Yn• « .I.i.... wr r r r r _�r r r r r • •r 1 .mow ` r r I / I I r Y '/ -w I I •. � � I � � I"w�✓ w r • �r,r'h..n,_1u w r Fw i++�• '�{ �,�. r: ti II •r r t 1 e' �+ .. I S r 1 I I ,. �r ''ill, r:;i:44(6,c,„?. . ...,_________2 I I I 1 • I gg / :.7 d 9 w YY . • r M / A ,,,, pm"' . I /roposed r d N ^r r 1{ "4 t k' I r I Ind I • �,14 I N tiA , i�l I � �, �� h a� Retail II t .. I I I I - s ACCESS AL ERN TIV FIGURE I • I 11595 SW Pacific Highway Retail Development 1• I I , I r. I I r � I I I r. • � d r ` • h 11595 SW Pacific Highway Retail Development--Tigard, Oregon Access Alternative "A" I i . •' This s access alternative assumes that all site traffic arrives departs via the shared red I �• ,, Fred Meyer l Retail Centers driveway. Access spacing generally refers to the spacing of side streets along the main highway. In the case of Access Alternative"A", I , driveways and drxvewa s g however, the critical spacing is the distance along the shared accessway between the proposed site driveway and SW Pacific Highway. This distance or space, as measured in t he field, is less than n to n f eet. This ten foot spacing creates a significant nt o era ion and I • safety problem. From an operation and safety perspective, Access Alternative A maximizes the potential frequency and severity cif conflicts between vehicles attempting to access the abutting �,... , • property and ve�,cles attempting xn 'to travel though h on SW Pacific Highway. . �ue to the • the proposed access driveway enters the Meyer hared . fact that lx sites prop � `red 1W.ley access only ten feet from SW Pacific Highway, the proposed site driveway will be blocked by,a single vehicle queued at the shared access drive to Pacific Highway; Once blocked., vehicles wishing to enter the proposed site must wait until the obstructing vehicle clears. Observation of the shared access driveways operation during the p.m;,peak hour reveals that during the eak.hour, vehicle queues up eliicles'are co As a ' •• � g p mi. peak q ues of u. to five y common, result, proposed site driveway is blocked for as much as three minutes at time. ult, the prop e a e" ; Vehicles wishing to enter the proposed site must wait until I the obstructio n (bl oo ling Ivehicle) to the site driveway is removed, Vehicles waiting to enter the site can potentially queue through lanes or block the continuous left turn Pacific b. q into tl�rou lane of P'acxfic �igh.way thereby � • creating severe conflict potential on the high volume/high speed facility. (. Figure 4) fee I Access Alternative "B" ... I I alternative assumes that site traffic can arrive and depart via a dedicated '.• ' This access alter site I • driveway directly to Pacific highway; As shown in rig re 4 under Access Alternative "B", • ra° c ,pact 7104 ysts w I I I I ( I I I ,,� • I. • • 11595 SW Pacific Highway Retail Development--Tigard, Oregon the spacing between the proposed site driveway and the shared Fred Meyer Retail Center driveway is only approximately 70 feet, However, confl...ictib.g movements are separated and the potential for l site driveway blockage and subsequent highway conflicts is minimized to the extent possible. Thus, Access Alternative "B" minimizes conflicts, increases the efficiency of operation, provides the highest degree of safety possible under prevailing conditions. • � I I • • iI' i I,' � I ! I • i I . • 4 • • •a i I I i I i I i I i • ra t'o mpcfet nrt ysts I , tt t yy .. •1 I 91155 r SW Pacific Highway lte l Development fc tai Uet Io�ane.nt �Z'cgard, Oregon ,.rte ..._.._.. i, FINDINGS AND ECO1VIl A.E.IO,l ' • � . , Based on the results of the traffic impact analysis described in this report, the proposed .. . , retail site can be developed with minimal impact to the surrounding '4ttreet system. The r . ' specific findings are as follows: yN Findings Recommendations: I , 1 The proposed retail development is e l,pr. d to generate at most 1 approximately 30 evening peak hour trips»' 1 I I e 1 2) The addition of site traffic on 1993(background traffic levels will have an negligible impact on study area intersections and ros.dway segments. I ♦ I 8) All site driveways were found to operate at acceptable levels of service , ¢ • under full-build conditions , ', ,' 4) Site access limited only to the Fred Meyer,Retail Center shared access driveway m :imizes the potential frequency and severity of conflicts between vehicles attempting to access abutting properties and vehicles I W attempting to travel ta' h� 'gh on SW Pacific Highway,� � , � � � � �� . 5) The provision of re t s to access access t t o Pacific Highway a minimizes conflicts, increases the efficiency F of operation, a�%d provides the highest degree of . safety under r ', i . , . . I I I IG I � I II /• Z t g an.,, 'e'cainmen ,tto n' I V } I , . V -,v I 11595 SW Pacific Highway Retail Development--Tigard,Oregon 1R I., , ( I s. 1. Oregon Department of Transportation, Oregon Highway Plan, June 1991 2. Tri-Met, 1993 Bus Schedule 3. Transportation Research Board,Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report No. 209, 1985. • L 4, Oregon on Department of Transpox•tat i n, Accident Summaries,r es 1991 I 1 I 5. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual: Fifth Edition, 1990 I I I I , r I I I I I I II I I I I I , I • , I I R I I I , I I N I i I I I I i , L r 1, � � � � � ��,� I � � �� 1 i I ef II • I I I I I l • f'. I I I I , I 1 :.d 1 z irt, s a1i ' o TATer atirhi"d■, , I rd . r , s i . . • • I P` • 11595 SW Pacific Highway Retail Development--Tigard, Oregon APPENDIX A a LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS®NS I , I Level of Service (LOS) a concept developed to quantify t Le degree of comfort (including •such elements as travel time, number of stops, total amount of stopped delay, and other impediments caused by vehicles) afforded to drivers as they travel through an intersection • or roadway segment, The 1985 Highway Capacity Marwal (Reference 3)includes a detailed methodology for calculating the LOS at both signalized and unsignalized 4 intersections, g Generally, LOS for signalized intersections is based on the average stopped delay per t 1 vehicle. Table A-1 qualitatively describes the six recognized levels of service for signalized L intersections, while Table A-4 identifies the relationship between average stopped delay • per vehicle and 3,.%. el'of service. . �, I The calculation. of LOS at an unsi�a zed x n terseati i p n requires a �different approach, At , these locations,'LOS is based upon the concept of"Reserve Capacity" (i.e,, that portion of v I A � .' the the available hourl ca acct. that is not used), n qualitative description of the vara.ous , V service levels associated with an lunsi g'r'ialized p intersection is presented in Table A-3. A ' quantitative definition of LOS for an unsignalized intersection is presented in Table A-4. The reserve capacity concept applies only to an in.divid.u,al traffic movement or shared lane , ''r movements. Once the capacity of all the individual move. eats has been calculated and . _ I w I : be�1 made.�Normally the movement having ed�ono verb n ll evaluation of the intersection can y worst LOS defines the overall evaluation, but this may be tempered by engineering judgement, • 111 I I � Past experience,v�th the unsignalized h z ed ana 1 s I rs procedure ce'd ure indicates dicates t hat this methodology 1 is very conservative in that it ten ds to overestimate the magnitude of any potential problems. Therefore, unsignalized p' ore, the results of any unsx in.tersection analysis should be reviewed with this thought in mind, I I All LOS analyses described in this report were performed in:'accordance with the 1 described above, Copies of the analysis forms are contained in Appendix II. Y procedures de Copies y pp As described '�� ,� As , � analysis based upon conditions, I � above, and to in Sure that this anal � z wor�t�case�c�autliti.ons' the a‘ma and p p eak hoI u r turning mave r.. n t volumes were used for in the intersection rs. e c ion and driveway evaluations. Thus, the analysis reflects conditio n s that are only likely to occur for an hour �� _ �� average weekday, 'For�� each weekday, and throughout'the weekends, traffii�. conditions , .�.e remsiiriderimpact of e area are 1� wit in the stud c y � oce t :� f study likely to be better that described in this report, I I I I I I I I I I I I I r I i I p e''MT I � I • i i • r r • 11595 SW Pacific Highway Retail Development--Tigard, Oregon . `Table A4 ,• LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS (SIGNALTMD INTERSECTIONS) . ---r---- _- ` . Level-uf- .:,a Service Traffic c Flo Characteristics A Very; low average stopped delay, less than five seconds per vehicle, This occurs , • w. g Y when progression is extremely favorable, and most vehicles arrive during the green phase. Most vehicles do not stop at all, Short cycle lengths may also contribute to • ..., _ low delay. B Average stop delay is in the range of 5.1 to 15.0 seconds per vehicle. This generally occurs with good progression and/or short cycle lengths. More vehicles 4..1 stop than for LOS A, causing higher levels of average delay. C Average stopped delay is in the range of 15.1 to 25.0 seconds per vehicle, These higher delays may result from fair progression and/or longer cycle lengths: .., Individual cycle failures may begin to appear in this level. The number of vehicles • stopping is significant at this level, although many still pass through the intersection without stopping. i .-.•.ter I i` j. • i D Average stopped delays are in the range of 25.1 to 40.0 seconds per vehicle. The 1 influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result'from i't' ' some combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle length, or high I volume/ca acit• ratios. Many vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not volume/capacity Many p, p p stopping declines. Individual cycle failures are noticeable, E Average stopped delays are in the range of 40.1 to 60.0 seconds per vehicle, This is considered to be the limit of acceptable delay. These high delay values generally . indicate poor progression long cycle lengths, and high volume/capacity ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. r Average stop delay is in excess of 60 seconds per vehicle, This is considered to be unacceptable to most drivers, This condition often occurs with over-saturatiOn, It may also occur at high volume/capacity ratios below 1.00 with many individual G cycle failures. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also be major con tribttin g causes to such high delay levels, I .._..._ • Note;' A s i g n a l cycle failure is considered to occur when one or more vehicles are forced to wait through more than one green signal indication for a particular lar approach. I I • r I � I I w2' i i • 1 I' I • I I III � i i I 1 V w .,. r -. .,.., i.r rr „ .. ...ixn., • ._I.•c.ro. .-. -rwr....,...,.a .ak...rw+n,.+i.a..I r..»..., r.....l.,..n-r l.,ar-+..n a s ..d.Irlr la r r,,,--. I { 11595 SW Pacific highway Retail Development Tigard, Oregon 1 }, Table A-2 G. 4 LEVEL-OF-SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Lev�el-of-Service . Stopped Delay per Vehicle (Sec) ,; 5.0 r , I .: B 5.1 to 15.0 �.. r 15.1 to 25.0 ;. I� 25.1 to 40.0 --.--� t� 1 . E• E 40.0 to 60.0 F' > 60,0 1 Source: 1985 Highway Capacity Manual II r r, . 1 I 1 1 I I 1 n r I 1 1 I Ili r 1 1 I I 1 t ' 1 I • 1' I 1 I I I t: I , I I I r I up ■ I 1 I ' I i 1 l, 1 1 1 li ` w mi II. 1 1 ro..r-.........rr ,, ... ., II 1 I Ii 1 f I + ., r.. .r rr r:', r r ,r�I. ,.,,,,,.,. s r, ...'.I..,...I.., „ r ,.r.r... .r., r.. ,., •. .,,r,.. •.• .......... ......... r .,.d. .,L..,..�,...., a ,...,• r .. ... ..._.......,,..• ..,. .,., .......,.�. I , n r I . • 11595 SW Pacific Highway Retail Development--Tigard,Oregon •-- "9 Fable A.•3 GENERAL LEVEL OE SERVICE DESC ,1PTIONS FOR UNSIG AIZ D INTERSECTIONS ......_�. LOS General Description A - Average delay per vehicle ranges between 0 and 10 seconds Nearly all drivers find freedom of operation II - Wry seldom is there mere than one vehicle in the queue B - Average e dela per vehicle r w..x g delay p ranges between 10 and 20 seconds - Some drivers begin to consider the delay an inconvenience -' Occasionally there is more than one vehicle in the queue C Average delay per vehicle ranges between 20 and 30 seconds Many times there is more than one vehicle in the queue Most drivers feel restricted, but not objectionably so , ' D Average delay per vehicle ranges between 30 and 40 second Often there is more than one vehicle in the queue . Drivers feel quite restricted p in which the demand near or equal to th E � � Represents e resents a condition ` d :is the probable maximum number of vehicles that can be accommodated by "- the movement - Average p �� tvehicle a nd 60 seconds � There is almost than one t he queue be approaching intolerable levels rivers find the delays s t o F Forced flow i Represents r e sents an intersection failure re co ch tidn that is caused b Y , geometric and/or operational ca ngtrai.nt s external to the intersection • I I I ; li I I I i I I ; . I • • e I I , I I • a • • . 1 1._ .aal.. .r.,L. 1 ..a.ri4Ja.-a.y+na.o a • r I 11.596 SW Pacific Highway Retail Development--Tigard, Oregon • Table A4 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR YJ■ SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Reserve Capacity Level of Expected Delay to (pcph) Service Minor Street Traffic > 400 A i Little or no delay 300-399 13 - Short traffic delays 200-299 C Average traffic delays 100-199 Long traffic delays . 0-99 E Very long traffic delays I * When demand volume exceeds the capaei4,y of the lane;extreme delays will be encountered with queuing which may callse severe congestion affecting other traffic movements in the intersection. This condition usually warrants improvement to the intersection, cour ce; Transportation Research Board, Hig hvav Capacity Manual".Special Report 209 • • • (.985 I I • rr, r i I I r I I I I I 1 r I ri I I ll II I r I r I I I I I I I , 11595'S'W Pacific Highway Retail Development--Tigard Oregon • fI APPE IX B 'LEVEL OF SER ZCE WORKSHEETS ;pr • L a' • • • • • I • I I I } • I w I I • , k I I I 4' , I I • l' , I « y9 r _ I I I 11 H I I C r.,b I I I . : F 1 It I � ' 1 ICI . l',' ( t f JJ I i N I I I I 1,1 I I I I I r I , , I I I l I I I I I I P u , I I. . 1985 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 . . i ; :k********************** **** ***=t**** ' :************=k*********** **sic IDENTIFYING I INFORMATI Oi . w Y . . _ ...YI .. ... Y ._..N. . _, Y ._ Y,Y N ,Y.. .._. . . . _. I 1 i AVERAGE RUNNING, SPEED „ MAJOR STFEET'Y5 I. • I , 1 1•.YA �� 1 l I'1 (/�,�T'�R x N NN N W W Y N • N • 4 Y N 'F 4 w I I1 rl N AREA POPULATION . . „ II Y N YI I�M M M N 4 Y . y . . M 4 N 500000 • � 1 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREETS :,Shared Access Driveway teway . NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH 'STREET . Y Y 4 . . SW Pacific Highway NAME O THE ANN.••fYST';Y' 4 N 4 N 4 .14 N N N Y 4 Y 4 DBM I I I 1 w,I Y. 1993', I I �.. , I / ,. DATE F TNT, ANALYSIS � mm/d� yy ) N � u1� r \1 1 �µr�� Iy+.,I (J�,I /y 1w»�N.�7 y�..J` ,ry TIME', �4.w1 1�`�✓� A (I Ik+Yf...4..4+y M NN I'M I,N N '4 N'N N 4 WN 1 M, IP�+%��I I M P h N N N I I, : , OTHER INFORMATION N . . Exiting Conditions INTERSECTION i1 E, AND ND . CONTROL w I l .w..N,w-w--. ..Y.v.w.Y,w 1. y—..„....0. ,M..... ...__Y .*_. . av w • . .:w.r...:.1 N..a....,..m._„... «w r«...w. ..w.Yw...._ Y_ 1..,.....___ I , L. I . I • ' , INTERSECTION TYPE T -INTERS ECTION�T�ON 1 • I I I 1 it a ' : MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: 1NOPTH1/SOUTH ! e , ,I CONTROL TYPE EASyf hOUND rl STOP SIGN I,, 1 Y I I I I � ' I I . , I I I I TRAEw P I C VOLUMES' , I Y ......,w*Y....Y..J{iW_I..***Y.Y**Y.:;**w:*****...Y..41.y..**F'.IY_..44**w,........,__r..•.,......-.y..Wy..J..w,*_4.i.,4.W...1..:i:..-1r'.r.-Y.:+r.--4.V-..0- 1 {' 1 I I �.w 1 1 1 I I y 58 WB NEB SF3 I I � I � l LEFT 5 - 1 95 O 1 �V .I U 0 15 9Q 1920 1 I i t i Y, I I yh �j EIc..1EIT 125 —w 0 10 , I I I I I NUME:3ER OF LANES I I. .••1•.Y:Y.Y...N..-N..-JiM_....Y..,..w-,.,.r.-.Y_L-..;..,....Y_I _-,..Y..W...w.....i.._,.....y..___Y...uy_......Y_4ir..wx Y.Y.N__....M.....•..4____.F»_.M..r..._ " 1. '� �� N3 S � ff }, I ,II h I • I� I ,. F I I LANES I� I I I , I 11 II I� , I I I I _ I I I. I I ; I i 1 �i p I ■, i la ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-? W___..i___w.....Mw w✓-,w".Nr.w .u.. ..•.•W...rwr-...1-'....w"....,w...•.w�....r.w M.r Mww..v...-w.7 w".♦.....www.,...1..-Mw..ti. W......`..M.•.w-'µ9 wti....w.....:..i..:.... h PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS ) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE 1 FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS _ __w M..__Mw ». wr M.W....w M.w.,_.w., MM w" w. Mw n w.w .w. w, EASTBOUND 0 .00 0 20 y . I WESTBOUND I S TBOuND � wrr. NORTHBOUND 0 00 4 , 9010 N I a SOUTHBOUND 0 .00 ' 90 20 N � I VEHICLE COMPOSITION° V�. LB �0 ITION I I 1 , ...n...........w......Mw Wu Mw MW wv...w FM.....w.•I.w M•...r Mw MM NW.w..Mµ4 W wr..1...w..t. ITMN..r.4 W...w,n w.ww Mw M.4.r YW 1.w Mn.Nyu i,.• ..'.w.w wM Wy,M,.Mw M..........M,N w,.r/....,ww Wk.i..M.......wn M,.Mw w.p..l M....w ' _* II a SLJ I TRUCKS % COMBINATION , • 1 7 � %Q 1 VEHICLES ! < AND RV 'S '��;I�I�CL�.� �� MuT�OF`CYCLL.� EASTBOUND 0 a a , . .1, WESTBOUND wow w I I I NORTHBOUND 0 h 1 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 0 I . I r 1 CRITICAL GAPS ' 1 ....,u.... w:w......: .... _,...+. .....a.lw_«».«M,.ww.,"ww...-.w-w i.N.w*w.*w+. -*...J.:..nc,w****-**w,..:w....„ ....w ti..-..,r TABULAR VALUES' ADJUSTED , Sx GHT ' D ST . FINAL (Table a � a� � VALUE ADJU STMENT NT CRITICAL RIT�cAL � �� s . :w -w.-,--- wr+4 —ww Mww. w I ....„-_-___....„-_-___....1„.__-_ wM ....w...M __ w_— I MINOR RIGHT I I i BB Vh 0 � 0 .00 I , h 1 C, • 1 I . 1 MAJOR LEFTS I I , N I N80 I SN`3a I Naa 5 .30 • 1 MINOR LEFT S ' ' ' 1 !I 1: ' 1 I • 1 h h oa / N'-Ta, I M M IDLNTxFYI NG INFORMATION 1 i ..M�.k.w..w.w 1....4w,Mw....*w.w* ....,W 1.w..I..,*• W 6w M..1Mi',*,,W...r Y..j 1..J w",.j.1...ww ..:r...✓:.d.w......1..J......1.w W V*,lw..**Mr w..:.,*4..F+.4. y i i..f••^.•w�,ww.w wh,MMf....'}rr..". .N M1i M.J ww, M.r M.0 I i NAME OF HE LAST/WEST STREtT M M H N SM M Shared Access Viw.� • NAME o T NORTH/SOUTH V T L .ThN SW Pacific Hx,ohway DATE'' AND TIME, OF THE ANALYSIS „ . '. .' June 1993 y PM Peak 1 OTHER IINFORMATro I' Nl' Exs!tIing Conditions H 1 , II II I I 1 � I li I I I I I I I d I o F Li I I I {{ I F 1 I I 1 1 , I 1 • CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 r I, .�...,..�,.....:w..,'... W,��,,.,w.�_ww.......,'�r w,W� .r NW..,'.«.;.r~.�...,,. ...�w.:N_�..�r,.�«.,W,.,..•..W......��.Wr.N.:��....,_,.'.r., Ww�._....,.. .N,.,N.N,«W....:;.'...'...�_�,..«.,. I I POTEN- OTEhJ�- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL. MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v( P P ) P P ) ( P P ) ( Igo P ) =. W�. � h c C c h c c h c o h c v LOS P M SH R SH • • ( , �. i I ' rwW w vwr+wW W N.w'rxw rN W Wr wwM MA'MW ILw'M'^Irul wW N•«.W W w W rr rr W 1wr.wr vw WN Nw..Ww'«.W r.w wW NAM urr Nw ' ♦«w N.w rw«w N.4 v«'.W..w rr 1•M Mw wr N•rW ww NwW . N a MAN R STREET R�,LT E5 LEFT 15 63 30 ' > 30 ' 25 > E >' 273 > 143 >D RICH`! I 125 400 400 > 400 > 275 > C MAJOR STREET r I rwa N5 LEFT 96 161 161 161 65 E I I • IDENTIFYING INFORMATION .. «.N--•.W«.r:.r.---..-----N.'•«.W-N.W1,'..-..rrw«.r---:.-W---«.Lw«„- h.'-«- N„. «.. wwN«r wr NwN w«wN.W .. .N «.. r«W r«v rAW NAME or- THE'.' EAST/WEST STREET . . . , . . Shared Access D r i veway NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH J TRH E w w . SW Pacific Highway DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS . . . . June 1998 ti PM P98k OTHER INFORMATION . . Exsix 7c Conditions I I , II' i I I I i i I I I I I ' r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I .r rr . a 1 . J 1 a I i I ' t I ' , 1 385 HC M; U S M Z V INTERSECTIONS , Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _W__rW W__y xxN____ 6.r W--,..W_W_W_— x••r._.•N—_ _W__—x•.u_W 1•.I+___—N1..•fi._—Nw__ _----_—of AV ERAGE RUNN NG PEED ti AA OR STREET 45 I R� ( AC`I �✓I Nw N w w w 0 N.wN N N w u NI n .'H. µ' ir I AREA POPULATION,,'h N 'n N' M'N N N N N N F N N,MIh • '., N M' 500000 r' h NAME i NAME 1 rOF THE EAST/WEST STREET' . , w N ,, w N N Shared Access Driveway NAME OF THE' NORTH/SOUTH STREETNY : N „ ww SW P-oific Highway ` NAME OF THE ANALYSTNN w w w,NNN'Iw NN DBM a F 1 A TE OF T -E, ANALYSIS C r m/ d/y ) N N , a l m Jun 19 3 r I TIME PERIOD Ohl L N N w wl N F� �v ^ 1{l A 1 �.•F..i MMi NN 'N'•) N w N N F PM Peak 11 OTHER INFORMATION, ,,!. E si s to traffic, I I I I I S;NTEIECTION TYPE AND CONTROL W v W r , ,' :. J1 ,,. ...x. N Y rY . wr W., wWuv W J. ,I Nrµi.`V w J W wr r W .. w W .4•V u w..,.1•. .w w•w W h wJ N w INTERSECTION TYPE N T N TERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION t NORTH/SOUTH ' 1 1 1 1 I CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND STOP' SIGN I ' TRAFFIC VOLUMEa 1 i 4Lw r . W W W W W W w w. w x M rW s W W . w w . u w4 wW W r w W W wJ w wW . ww wW i..W 4Ww W .. « . .W al •I 1 EB I US N I I , 5 I 1 E J . J r I w . I , I I M LF1 5 103 O I I r I ' THRU r i I —w J l I i RIGHT 140 — 0 28 d C . 1 i' • I r I I 1 I E 1 I 11 W.,w,«r M..,J J.xN I.,. .-._, a•u.,J.r:J w.J..H.„1..W i-N....,..1 r...J,1.b• :w w•L..:d..,..A.r c,.—,•w.r...x.:J,.•.r_,••,wJ,,.. ,r_...J N.._••. .„.,.w,J.w..W r...'N-JJ,Y..».+.,.•.F.JJ J.r w..•..»W r.,.«..«.A.,.�.aw,.....,.. I 1 WB N3 . SE I ,( I 1 i,I� r L'AN ES I I I I 1 I r 3 , I I I I I i � I. I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I , rVr.. „„r rx.r a,x�,�, �,.urn.rn r I `n rM I . . . , o .. . . . " 1 t w I I t. ADJUSTMENT FACTOR � 1 Page-2 Y ...M wr w w~ .... 4.. ..Y....Y.,Y. __w.w....,.._ _ w. _ ,..r,w. PERCENT RIGHT; TURN CURB RADIUS ( ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE, FoR RIGHT 'TIURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS 1 G.r . r -_~ .. ... . r wr- w __......Y r_. N__ .w . w .r. _w� w. w w w. . ._ 1 I EASTBOUND C �a0 ' 90 ?a y 1 1 1 I 1 � 1 1 , WESTBOUND w..w.— w.-,'.- ° .... u.Y , F, id 1 Y N 1 1 NORTHBOUND a a�a l:. . I '�I1 SOUTHBOUND a .O0 90 ,G.0 N I� 1 1 1 0 0 1 VEM�:CI..E CONIp �,�Tx N �; .W r.N.1w rw.Y✓wr .•...Y..wu M wM..•'......w..u.w .....1•+.........Y..Yr N'Yr Yr.Y.Y..r v.W.w w.. Ynr..Y wr,..r wYU rw....Yw•.lw�....L .... YW..M Y+.4••Yw.,,r.W....Yw.Y.w..N...Y..w.......YW ', , ' " 1 1 � SU TRUCKS a ,COMBINATION I AND Rv . VEHICLES . a� MOTORCYCLES 'I w r 0 �a 1 C7 EASTBOUND l I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 . ' WESTBOUND , _L w. w:w-. 1•1 � , ' 1 I ' . NORTHBOUND' ,o I I 1 SOUTHBOUND MBCUN� a I CRITICAL GAPS, : ' J '. ........ w4..,wW .....1..N.w 4..Ww»w W+" w.Y.r 1iw........,..w.w.......,...._..r.M..w.......,......:..Y..:�.. 1 Y...YM,........J Y......�..............L✓-..r Y•..1....Y..l.YY..w.LL..,........,..w.... .wY....b.L 1✓M I . , TA BU L A R VALUES Aq JuS Ea SIGHT DIS T .: FINAL 1 1 , (Ta b le 10-2), V A L UE. ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GA S . f . Y Y . M . w. , ...4..�'.+. . .:Y� J.wv .Wd. W . w.r M 1 . ..,. ..r.., YW i '., M�NoR RIG-TS 1IIn 1 1 , 1 o � M� r o .aa I � waa 1 I • I 1 1� I ' I I 1 1 I1 MAJOR 1 LEETS � Sn �':3b aU ' 5 ,3C7 NB W , 1 MINOR LEFTS P n M B 7 40 I b C0 7 M 40 I 1 1 IpENTIr1'ING ' INEORMATICN Y..,� ---.....—.,: �- _� ,..w1....i..r:....4...r..1 Y..Y,.v Y.I..w.:...,..r.....Y+'W....J�...Y..4.r.x w:.,d w.I:..i...bN............. Y.r yw.�,+.wr.�.,.� 4w d...'Y..Y'...Y ..0 wJ,Y...w. Y.v......w:.w ww '' NAME Or THE BAS '1WE5TS TFEE` , h 'W Shared 1,Aoteps D riva�1 way x . NAME bF T��I 'NCfHr'S �JT�-{ 51 : '`� MW , act fx, M g y DATE AND TIME ©F THE ANALYSI .. . lure 1993 5 PM Peak iCT-BS G hFo M TION w . E>dstn P lus site traff is C 1 : 1 i ! 1 � 1 I I 11 ' 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 11 I I • ' 1 1 l i � 1 I 1 I is I 1 I I i 1 1 t 1 1 I" i I 1 1 • 1 I 1 • r ",., ..r_i... .. _.." .._.,, .._,.. ..A....1..1..-......-... ... • .h-e.i •, •.•.... • ..a.._, v.•,,.ilk-.•,. ., .,, ._•...S ' ...."..,.. .v.....-.,......F._a-.M. _..,.J...»...,a ,»... ,..,....+.. ..,....«..,•...,, ,.. .,• ...of-• ., CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 t I POTEN- ACTUAL RESERVE ° TIAL FLOW MOVEMEN RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v( pcph ) c ( pcph ) c ( pcph ) c ( pcph ) c c LOS i p MH RH 1 _ I I MINOR STREET , I EB LEFT 5 63�I 27 > 27 > 22 > > 271. ) 126 >0 RIGHT 14.01 398 398 > H 39S > 258 > C I I • MAJOR STREET I I NB L F T 104 161 161 161 I 5 II I I I I • I I I I L I NFO MATRON • IDENTIFYING R --- - ---w—w-- .. —wS_« ..''w _—` ---wW —_ w-1,._w _ww---- a---Y r— _ r. — w—_—m. -- :, NAME or THEI' EAST/WEST STREET , . . . , shared red Access Dr veway •NAME or THE NORTH/SOUTH 'STREET „ . .. „ SW Pacific Hi• hway DATE AND TIME ' or THE ANALYSIS : , N „ I, June 1993 y PM Peak . OTHER INFORMATION . . . , lExisitng plus site traffic, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • I I I , II I I I I I I t I I I I _„ I I I I I I I I I 111 . Q ,, • . , . r , c,, ., „ A 1. . I P. • . N 1 w • , 19-8'.51 `HCM• :-y1 _y1 lUN1S.I1y`�(:1NALIZE.I INTERSECTIONS ry1 Iy1 'YY. y�''1y�-y y1 �y1 yt �y1 r. Page-1 \' , ******' ***'1•}rl`***: ***********•I_*********** ******�I�'1,***** 1.1**'1 *******,**** IDENTIFYING INEORMATInN I AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED MA 'OR' STREET . h 4a � , PEAK HOUR FACTOR N h F N N N N MI N N N NN N N N x 1 ,” I l ' 1 AREA��1 POPULATION . .VM..��1/ tl M iN N��.N �N� N Y NN' Y H IAN N N • ti/VW',W T+O i i , 1 NAME OF THE AST/W ST�' STREET , w1 N , . � � . r N I �:d rat Driveway , ` INAME OF- THE N©RTH/SCUTH STREET N NN N N SW Pacific H .ghwar • NAME OF ,THE}1 [A� , 1 f 1.w 1 1 N(�)�]I f��() 1 l 1 11ww rS R N M N N N��N �NI ' N N N N SIN N'N N W W I i I CHAT Of THE �� IE ANALYSIS rim/rid �y/ vJ yy � � �'�I I�N �N N N N M ti��ll��r, ��/4�, TIME ,PERIOD A 111-1 1 NN N N N h N h" N N N N NN ��+yy�y/� y �k 1 OTHER INFaRMATIJN . N . �xzsato 1 u� site { NTk CT oN TYPE ;I D CONTROL Y i W. .'-- ...w W w . W.M W W . . .-w . .-.y.w w y ..i.0 .H w....... W 4W J.W . -5..rw w w1.......v 4W .iw. . w. .... . .w , 1 ' INTERSECTI,oN TYPE:' T-INTERSECTIO � t ' , II' T1 7 l 'MA' 'OR STREET 'D�IREC'TION W NORTH/SOUTH ' I; CNt TY A S CCU N wSTOP SG N II ., TRAFFIC VOLUMES I . 1 rE W8 N8 30 'I . LEFT : CJ S �} I I '� HR11 ' I it ' RIGHT 15 : ' .. ': ':f , H : ' ' ' f :, , I ,NUMBER OF LANES � f , ......i...r{.w.Y.N......w +.:..w...„.,.i...w NW N_....cw..., .M........i,,. a...•+..v w....w.�.w.r..'r.N w w... ..w..w+......1. ......:..,ww w.+/a... w ' . w'F....,w F.uIw!.ur...1... :..,..r.,we... l§ 1 ' 1 �1' I I i i 1 ..,....,,,,..0'. .. w.. .d,4* % ......i.+µ..,4 l:d. r..:F.w..—f...,...."« '' : ' r LANES' : , , i 1 i 1fi t }} r I' • I i 11i r I• , I r ADJUSTMENT FACTOR c Pa 2 • •(i � 1 ' PERCENT RIGHT 'TURN. ' CURE RADIUS ( ft )ft ) ACCELERATION LANE•• GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURN 1, EASTBOUND � 0 00 90 •I • WESTBOUND -- — � , �' ' I ... NORTNBOUh!0 0 �O 0 20 N f' • SOUTHBOUND p!,,,001 90 ' , . 20 N ' 'VEHICLE 'COMPOSITION' ——«...4..w .....—.....w—w ....——....+ —,..... . ...a..—„,,,.+.». r,..,.w„—•.:. � r.w....w..w.....,..—.....w.....—«....w......r,.—r..—.d.......—...�....—w..w...... % SU TRUCKS COMBINATION) . �� D� �,S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLE � AND' 0 ' ' 0 . ' • I : WESTBOUND �, � I ' ' . NOR r430UN SOU B 0 0 T N �, M I CRITICAL GAPS,, J W.iuwW4 .a.-w _•.u-,..Fw•....-.W lw Yrt W _,L___ .4- M.w,.w,.w+WwWY...Yw..WrnW- ..w ....W..„. .1.Lw W . M ... . iwr ..4.. .,uN5....WYW--w .4.Mrw_I.....•M � V J + yi ry4 � i • . ( Table 10.2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAR, ...y.w..--u . , .. -M ---* ..w —..y --..v— ._i- 1 ,r --w: „.,a 1 f M I N O R R I G H T S .50 6 „10' SW10, � I�� OW00 , 5 „�10 ;I I CI � r 1�'IA�, R L 7 . NB 5'w,80 W'30 0 00 S';30 M •E i;'INOR LETs O0• l• Y I . . .: H H 11•1) , 'NTH { Tr`,� 't� �1ATxON NAME' 0r THE EAR WEST T�RLEr W : W Dedicated Site Dr ivewa,,y ' �, NAME, 0 �'ME0 7} ' � i ~ Pr hh I,. • AND TM � 0 T� aNALY G , ,,„ , , ui � 993y PH Peak`FORMAT ON E 'isitrg� 1uC site, traffic � i i fig i i i I i I i 11 i' i i i i I I I I i ' 'i w i I i AP t, 1 IP. CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Pa ___e..._ w...A ..._..w,,W.......ww,..w_W........w,...._..._w,......w_Ww__.«'_...........emu-w,.«....w_...._....__..w_..w__ ...w_+w..__..w .__w__W.-w »_ i, ,i POT EN-, ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE �... RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph ) c (pcph) c (pcph ) c (PcF h ) c - v LOS ' M SH R SH ■ . w wrAY w w. w wW 1.. w ww w M w• m 4w w w..MW WMWw W .Ww ww M � r - ww wWr. wMWw + M MINOR STREET z • EB LEFT I ,1 63 0 3 E RIOHT I STREET t s s [ MAJOR TR I N8 LEFT 161 16 16i 153 0 1. 9k I, A I IDENTIFYING INC INFCRMATION ..ww rww._....8_ . r w,_ ...... W ..w -w W w _ ..,..o ..8,M-M t_WIw w yW_w..._w.w_.. .....w ._w_. _r . _w_w . .,.._ w s Dedicated �r 9 i NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET . . . . SW I acfIc �H �hw Y b � DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS .' . . . . Jun 1g93 ; PM Peak ' OTHER INFORMATION . . . . CxisitnOl plus site traffic . • L • ., I I I I I C I I I 1 . I I -;I I I4 ■ � I r' II ' +rF • . • • 14 f, J . !1, • '4, ' I z,. 0 v : .,,.. 11'', • • mm 1 rr 1 4'1 • s y FILM , I 1:I 1 I , 1 1,11 I I , Al....7P), , I 1 • 1 1 r 1 1 iii I I I ( I, I I I i it i r i . P I 1 d I 1 M 1 1 1 •I , 1 I� r 1 • • 1