The URL can be used to link to this page

SDR1993-00025POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. ' & E PACIFIC/WASH. SQ. 9835 SW Greenburg Road 1S1 26C, 300, 402 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 1. GENERAL INFORMATION PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION 9Vie;7 , eroaffevi 91411._ TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO /62AUL4L tO7� gag÷_leV:€AL4h'a.tLe SITE SIZE 1.16_,AW5 PROPERTY OWNER/DEED rIOLDER*g69/4$95K/ :540,4V5 441. ADDRESS n23bl_gdOL_______ PHONE crry 776 s J6O4J zip 1122_112. APPLICANT* (W A*/ 411/41, ceiviner. ADDRESS igeLift.0441__ PHONE CITY gridWt2Ak4VA/ ZIP _57.1ma_ *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a leasee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner with written authorization. The owner(0) must sign this application in the space provided on page two or submit a written authorization with this application. EXHIBIT "A" FOR. STAFF USE ONLY 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY The owners of record of the subject property request it development review approval to allow g_itlekapo /700,0707/416 • "wti itexer, ,eyz tee teilaatigp altrig< 41(5/4* 0524P/13P 4449V3 44/0 Ne--174 Rev'd 5/87 CASE NO.ILLALZI3 662C OTHER CASE NOS: Yasi/ed RECEIPT NO. .2-7 ,:?,/,/6) APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: i:14? DATE: Application elements submitted: Application form (1) L,'5) Owner's signature/written authorization -V43gd- (C) Title t4aneler-instrument (1) 4,_.(D) Assessor's map (1) (E) Plot plan (pre-app checklist) L(F) Applicant's statement checklisti, in-11 ‘,14 (G) List of property owners' and L'L tet g addresses within 250 feet (L) ■.0 44, H) Filing fee ( L,"-(I) Construction Cost Estimatall (,)) DATE D5CEMINED BI e Valw t WM. ,c,i14,12 FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: COMP. PLAN/ZONE DESIGN 4.-- N,P,a.._Numberl Approval Date: Final Approval Date: Planning TION: 1 tr, Engineering List any variance, conditional use, sensitive lapp, or other land use actions to be considered as part of this app ication: /8r 051 leimart.45740444714eitir/I M /504r#d0041t) N/A/ i.b f /* VS/. Applicants To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. B. If the applicaion is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. //e day of 19 DATED this SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the subject property. Vice : esident WASHINGTON SQUARE, INC. • r• OFFICIAL SEAL KIMKIEALY A, LANE NOTAIW PUBLIO -OREGON COMMISSION Cia 0142W isstcm ExPirtEs MAU. 20, 1,r:).c.:,1 EXHIBIT C WA1HIllfNJT.: �1 SQUARE 9585 SW. Washington Square Rd, • Portlgnd, Oregon 97223 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 23535 d Tigard, Oregon 97223.0(195 (503) 639.8880 + FAX (503) 620 5512 November 23, 1993 Planning Department City of Tigard 13125 SW Hail Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 To Whom it May Concern: W &H Pacific has been authorized by Washington Square, Inc,, to make the necessary Applications for site development review on the Washington Square property. As agents of Washington Square, W&H Pacific will be submitting the formal Application, paying necessary fees and responding to comments that the City might have on the retail pad tat of I. C. Penney and Cucina! Cucinal north of TGTFriday's. Please let me know if you have further questions in this matter. Sinrrcly, WASHINGTON SQU E, INC, by'Ormma.r Comp ,.:, Inc, 3 Randy to Viet Pr idcnt '4" TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY W & H Pacific 8405 SW Nimbus Avenue Portland, OR 97280 Attn: Gary Christenson 2cc 02-41-00 Transamerica Title 555 S.W. flak Street, Plaza Le,..el Portland( )regon 97204-1152 (503) 2229931 FAX (503) 228-4276 EXHI IT "D" Washington Square, Inc. 700 - 5th Avenue Seattle, WA 98104-5026 Attn: Randy Kyte icc DATED : December 2, 1993 Plant Service Number: 26-42097H Title Officer : Dave Aldrich Reference Washington Sq. - Lot Line Adjustment Per your request we have performed the following plant service. The research involved took 15 hours which will be billed at $35.00 per hour. Reliance A Reliance Gaup Holdings Company P.(") 111.01 The following described land: PARCEL 1: That tra ^t of land situated in Section 26, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the Easterly line of that tract of land conveyed to D.W. Creary by deed recorded November 5, 1965, in Book 576, Page 196, Records of said Washington County, with the Southerly line of Hall Road (State Highway No. 217); thence South 64' 12' 59" East 73.30 feet; thence South 01' 03' 00" West 331.79 feet to the true point of beginning of the herein described tract; thence South 88' 57' 00" East 177.00 feet; thence South 01' 03' 00" West 532.68 feet; thence North 88' 57' 00" West 147.00 feet to a point of curvature; thence 47.12 feet along the arc of a 30.00 foot radius curve to the right through a central angle of 90' 00' 00" to a point of tangency; thence North 01' 03' 00" East 502.68 feet to the true point of beginning. PARCEL II: That tract of land situated in Sections 26 and 35, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the Easterly line of that tract of land conveyed to D. W. Creary by deed recorded November 5, 1965 in Book 576, Page 195, Records of Washington County, Oregon, with the Southwesterly line of Hall Boulevard; thence along said Southwesterly line South 64' 12' 59" East 268.18 feet; thence South 01' 03' 00" West 416,46 feet, more or less, to the Southwest corner of the tract of land conveyed to Robert L. Nelson and Mary E. Nelson by Deed recorded January 21, 1974. Said point of being the true ; yoint of beginning; thence along the South line of the aforementioned parcel South 88' 06' 05" East 288.17' feet to the Westerly right - of-way of Greenburg Road; thence tracing said right -of -way South 01' 30' 09" West 290.76 feet; thence South 11' 22' 29" West 38.65 feet to a point of non tangent curvature; thence leaving said Westerly right-of-way of Greenburg Road and tracing the arc of a 45.96 foot radius curve to the right (the radial center bears North 58' 58' 55" West) an arc distance of 48.18 feet through a central angle of 60' 03' 50" (the long chord bears South 61' 03' 00" West 46.00 feet) to a point of tangency; thence North 88' 55' 05" West 233,55 feet; thence North 01' 03' 00" East 366.47 feet to the true point of beginning. DATED December 2, 1993 PAGE 2 2642097 is purportedly owned by WASHINGTON SQUARE, INC., a Washington corporation. We find the premises encumbered as follows: 1. City liens, if any, of the City of Tigard. (No inquiry has been made. If a search is requested, an additional fee may be charged.) 2. Regulations, including the power to acquire rights of ways and easements, and to levy assessments of the Unified Sewerage Agency. 3. Regulations, including the power to acquire rights of ways and easements, of the Tualatin Valley Water District, 4, Lien, Filed In Favor Of For No. For No, Filed No, Account No. Balance April 2, 1977 Washington County Metzger Park LID (20 year 76-241 SW Hall Blvd./SW Scholls Ferry LID (10 year) 90-25 March 13, 1990 : 76-241-50 : 181 26C 0 0500 : $28.55 plus interest 5. Construction, Operation and Reciprocal Easement Agreement, including the terms and provisions thereof, Dated : March 25, 1972 Recorded : May 2, 1972 Book 865 Page : 12 Affects a portion and additional property The above Construction, Operation and Reciprocal Easement Agreeiment was amended by instrument, Recorded : July 19, 1973 Book : 936 Page : 284 Second Amendment, Dated : November 1, 1987 Recorded : February 20, 1990 Recorder's Fee No.: 90-08131 DATED December 2, 1993 PAGE 3 2642097 t f 6. Lease, including the terms and provisions thereof, Dated : July 20, 1973 Recorded : July 19, 1973 Book : 936 Page : 321 Lessor : Washington Square, Inc., a Washington Corporation Lessee J.C. Penney Company, Inc„ a Delaware corporation Recognition and Non-Disturbance Agreement, with Attornment provisions, including the terms and provisions thereof, Dated : July 20, 1973 Recorded : July 19, 1973 Book : 936 Page : 458 Between : Square Land Co., Ltd., an Oregon limited partnership - ground owner, Washington Square, Inc., a Washington corporation, And : J.C. Penney Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation Lease Amendment Agreement, Recorded February 20, 1990 Recorder's Fee No,: 90-08130 Affects Parcel I 7. An ea.,,ement created by instrument, including the terms and provisions thereof, Dated : June 7, 1979 Recorded : July 2, 1979 Recorder's Fee No.: 79025766 In Favor Of : Washington County For : Traffic control facilities, slope and drainage Location : Over the area adjacent to S.W. Greenburg Rod 8. No liability is assumed if a financing statement is filed in the office of the County Clerk covering fixtures wherein the land is described other than by metes and bounds, the rectangular survey system or by recorded lot and block. 9. Existing leases and tenancies, if any. 10. Personal property taxes, if any. DATED December 2, 1993 PAGE 4 2642097 NOTE 1: Taxes Total Amount Levy Code Account No. Key No, paid • NOTE 2: Taxes paid Tctal Amount Levy Code Account No. Key No. Affects additional property in full for the year $2,719.85 23-69 1S1260-00300 202686 1993-94, in full for the year 1993-94, $36,168,59 23-69 1S126C-00402 202686 NOTE 3: Taxes paid in full for the year 1993-94, Total Amount : $6,332,51 Levy Code 23-69 Account No. 1S126C 00500 Key No, : 202686 NOTE: This plant service is not to be construed as a commitment to issue title insurance, and is not for the purpose of foreclosure of any mortgage, trust deed, contract or mechanic's lien. Liability is limited to the addressee herein and to the amount paid for this service. We will not be responsible for errors or omissions herein. TAS/lc DATED December 2, 1993 PAGE 5 2642097 t�, c�' lc� �� NO btu �� w ��- E dimensions, easements, ecct'+ >d��sum�i� s not a r part of nor but not Itrnily, to, i y/ to � rt is attached. The Company r in Lon, rt modily, ��^"7aho'� � ('i'7j�,d® to an ' � raQt, �, `►wi �{� � ,•....er,.."" toLar.ima_t___ter reamed to ,►vu S. /3 At EASEMENT de•4°S30 114,02 Foo /,3tAi. N C,S, 8033 ri ITT 40a 6 A74c, C.S. 12654 116/1605.0, 1109 N eir (C S. Nd 11757) 1�iST ADDITION TO A CRESCENT GROVE CEMETERY . CRESCENT GROVE CEMETERY SEE MAP PACT FtC 8405 S.W. Nimbus Avenue P.O. Box 80040 Portland, OR 97280 Washingto Tigard, Ore disqualify mu of lease. By C parking spaces w etc. can be found APPLICANTS STATEMENT Square, Inc. (owner) intends to develop the 2.38 acre site at 9385 S.W. Greenburg Road, Yon, into a general retail use. At this time, we anticipate a single user but do not wish to tiple tenants. The proposed development is a 25,000 S.F. shell to be finished out at time ity of Tigard standards, this building would require 63 parking spaces. We propose 125 ith 2 designated handicapped spaces. Specific site date regarding site coverage, landscape )n sheet 1 of 5 of the proposal plans. Currently, the site co adjustment will be filed adjustment drawing can b trees on site. The final con proposed site is zoned C -G w access criteria are not applica isists of 2 tax lots and a portion of a third. Within the next 2 weeks, a lot line with the City of Tigard to eliminated the portion of the third tax lot. The lot line e reviewed as exhibit "P" of this application. Exhibit "P" also illustrates existing struction documents will address tree locations, preservation and removal. The existing an anticipated retail use on xisting lots of record so, City of Tigard solar ble to this application. t503) 6261.0455 Fax (50 .1) 526.0775 Planning .0 Engineering • Surveying a Landscape Archi Lecture Environmental Services PACIFIC. XHI 8405 S.W. Nimbus Avenue P.O. Box 80040 Portland, OR 97280 November 1, 1993 Canyon Furniture, Inc. 112.95 SW 135th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 RE: ha VELOPMENT REVIEW MEETING CITY Of TIGARD .;418 NO. 4-1276 -5802 Dear Neighbor: There will be an informational meeting on November 16, 1993 for a proposed development in your area. The proposal is to add a 25,000± s.f. retail building to Washington Square along Greenburg Road. The meeting is to explain the proposal to neighbors of the project and answer your questions, It will be held at: W&Il Pacific, Inc. 8405 SW Nimbus Avenue Beaverton, OR 97005 Phone No. 626 -0455 Contact: Michele Barstad We have enclosed a project location plan for your reference. If you have any questions or comments please plan on attending. Sincerely, W &HI: 'A,IFXC, INC. „ (7, „. 0/1 J.A.ellomy, Project Planner jabehnib enclosure (503) 026-0455 Fax (503) 526.0775 Planning • Engineering + Surveying 0 Landscape Architecture • Environniental Services I PACIFI.; 840,5 S,W. Nimbus Avenue P, O, Box 80040 Portland, OR 97280 November 1, 1993 Fringe Land Ore., Ltd. P.O. Box 21545 Seattle, WA 98111 RE: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MEETING - CITY OF TIGARD JOB NO. 4-1276-5802 Dear Neighbor: There will be an informational meeting on November 16, 1993 for a pro;:', I development in your area. The proposal is to add a 25,000+ s.f. retail building to Washington Squau along Greenburg Road. The meeting is to explain the proposal to neighbors of the project and answer your questions. It will be held at: W &H Pacific, Inc, 8405 SW Nimbus Avenue Beaverton, OR 97005 Phone No, 626 -0455 Contact: Michele Barstad W,, have enclosed a project location plan for your reference. If you have any questions or comments please plan on attending. Sincerely, , W&H PACIFIC, INC. r.A : el pmy, A.S.L.A. Project Planner jabelmlb enclosure MO) 626.0455 Fax (502) 526.0775 Planning i Engineering, • Surveying Landscape .Architecture Environmental Services PACTFIi 8405 S.W, Nimbus Avenue P.O. Box 80040 Portland, OR 97280 November 1, 1993 David & Linda Hudesman Co., TRS 3650 131st Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98006 RE: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MEETING - CITY OF TIGARD JOB NO. 4 -1276 -5802 Dear Neighbor: There will be an informational meeting on November 16, 1993 for a proposed development in your area. The proposal is to add a 25,000+ s,f. retail building to Washington Square along Greenburg Road, The meeting is to explain the proposal to neighbors of the project and answer your questions. It will be held at: W &H Pacific, Inc, 8405 SW Nimbus Avenue }Beaverton, OR 97005 Phone No. 626 -0455 Ccntact: Michele Barstad We have enclosed a project location plan for your, reference. If you have any questions or comments please plan on attending. Sint,urely, W &H A ' P�ACJFIC, INC. 3, jlorny, A.S.L.A. i Project Planner ✓ 4' j abe /tnib enclosure (503) 626-0455 Pax (503) 526 -0775 Planning • Engineering + Surveying 0 Landscape Architecture Environmental Services I PACIFIC 8405 S.W, Nimbus Avenue P.O, Box 80040 Portland, OR 97280 November 1, 1993 Barry R. Manashe 6426 SW Beay..rton Hillsdale Hwy. Portland, OR 97221 RE: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MEETING - CITY OF TIGARD JOB NO. 4-1276-5802 Dear Neighbor: There will be an informational meeting on November 16, 1993 for a proposed development in your area, The proposal is to add a 25,000+ s.f. retail building to Washington Square along Greenburg Road, The meeting is to explain the proposal to neighbors of the project and answer your questions. It will be held at: W &H Pacific, Inc. 8405 SW Nimbus Avenue Beaverton, OR 97005 Phone No. 626 -0455 Contact: Michele Barstad We have enclosed a project location plan for your reference. If you have any questions or comments please plan on attending. Sincerely, ,,,• W&H ' ACIFIC, INC, 11::-21/J / J4. 'Bellamy, Project Planner jabe /mlb enclosure (503) 626 -0455 Fax (503) 526 -0775 Planning • Engineering • Surveying Landscape Architecture • t nvironmental Services I PACIFk,' 8405 S,W, Nimbus Avenue P.O, Box 80040 Portland, OR 97280 November 1, 1993 Sears Roebuck, Co, 600 Sierra Macke Villa Avenue Pasadena, CA 91107 RE: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MEETING - CITY OF TIGARD JOB NO. 4- 1276 -5802 Dear Neighbor: There will be an informational meeting on November 16, 1993 for a proposed development in your area. The proposal is to add a 25,000± s.f, retail building to Washington Square along Greenburg Road. The meeting is to explain the proposal to neighbors of the project and answer your questions. It will be held at: W &fI Pacific, Inc, 8405 SW Nimbus Avenue Beaverton, OR 97005 Phone No, 626 -0455 Contact: Michele Barstad We have enclosed a project location plan for your reference. If you have any questions or comments please plan on attending, Sincerely, W &IX PACIFIC, INC, //?:.y." .,,;77//1"//1/ B horny, A,S.L.A. Project Planner jabe /nilb enclosure (503) 626.0455 Fax (503) 526 -0775 Mann'ng J Engineering • Surveying • Landscape Architecture • Environmental Services • PACIFIe' 8405 S,W, Nimbus Avenue P.O. Box 80040 Portland, OR 97280 November 1, 1993 US Bank P.O. Box 8837 Portland, OR 97208 RE: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MEETING - CITY OF TIGARD JOB NO. 44276 -5802 Dear Neighbor: There will be an informational meeting on November 16, 1993 for a proposed development in your area. The proposal is to add a 25,000± s.f, retail building to Washington Square along Greenburg Road. The meeting is to explain the proposal to neighbors of the project and answer your questions. It will be held at: W &H Pacific, Inc. 8405 SW Nimbus Avenue Beaverton, OR 97005 Phone No, 626 -0455 Contact: Michele B arstad We have enclosed a project location plan for your reference. If you have any questions or comments please plan on attending, Sincerely, W& - PACIFIC, INC. /'")/,;"Y/1"' J,;�Bellanyy, Project Planner Jabe /mlb enclosure (503) 626.0455 Fax (503) 526-0775 Planning 0 Engineering Surveying Landscape ArchitcOurc • Environmental Services I PACIFJi 8405 S.W. Nimbus Avenue P.O. Box 80040 Portland, OR 97280 November 1, 1993 Washington Square Inc. P.O. Box 21545 Seattle, WA 98111 RE: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MEETING - CITY OF TIGARD JOB NO. 4 -1276 -5802 Dear Neighbor: There will be an informational meeting on November 16, 1993 for a proposed development in your area. The proposal is to add a 25,000± s,f, retail building to Washington Square along Greenburg Road. The meeting is to explain the proposal to neighbors of the project and answer your questions. It will be held at: W &H Pacific, Inc. 8405 SW Nimbus Avenue Beaverton, OR 97005 Phone No, 626-0455 Contact: Michele 1.3 arstad We have enclosed a project location plan for your reference, If you have any questions or comments please plan on attending. Sincerely, ._ - -.a-- jabe /mib enclosure (503) 626.0455 Fax (503) 526-0775 Panning 6 Engineering 6 Surveying *Landscape Architecture r Environmental Services a� PACI]FE_'. 8405 S,W Nimbus Avenue P,O, Box 80040 Portland, OR 97280 November 1, 1993 Washington Square Inc, P.O. Box 10001 Dallas, TX 75301 RE: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MEETING - CITY OF TIGARD JOB NO. 4 -1276 -5802 Dear Neighbor: There will be an informational meeting on November 16, 1993 for a proposed development in your area. The proposal is to add a 25,000± s.f. retail building to Washington Square along Greenburg Road. The meeting is to explain the proposal to neighbors of the project and answer your questions, It ti sill be held at: W &II Pacific, Inc, 8405 SW Nimbus Avenue Beaverton, OR 97005 Phone No, 626 -0455 Contact: Michele Barstad We have enclosed a project location plan for your reference, if you have any questions or comments please plan on attending. Sincerely, W &I- PACIFIC, INC, (1://///*/ J.A.. 3e11 niy, A,S,L.A. / Project Planner ,J jibe /mib enclosure (503) 626 -0455 Fax (503) 526.0775 Planning 0 Engineering r Surveying i Landscape Architecture • Environmental Services PACIFIC: 8405 SW. Nimbus Avenue P, O. Box 80040 Portland, OR 97280 November 1, 1993 Washington Square Plaza P.O. Box 422 Florham Park, NJ 07932 RE: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MEETING - CITY OF TIOA RD JOB NO. 44276 -5802 Dear Neighbor: There will be an informational meeting on November 16, 1993 for a proposed development in your area, The proposal Is to add a 25,000+ s.f. retail building to Washington Square along Greenburg Road, The meeting is to explain the proposal to neighbors of the project and answer your questions, It will be held at: W &,H Pacific, Inc. 8405 SW Nimbus Avenue Beaverton, OR 97005 Phone No, 626 -0455 Contact: Michele Barstad We have enclosed a project location plan for your reference. If you have any questions or comments please plan on attending, Sincerely,��" ./� W841 PACIFIC, INC, LAKEigliorny, A.S.L,A. Project Planner jabe /inib enclosure (5031626-0455 Fax (503) 526.0775 Planning e ngineering I Surveying Landscape Architecture • Environmental Services PACIFIC 8405 S.W, Nimbus Avenue P, O. Box 80040 Portland, OR 97230 November 1, 1993 Franklin Commons Associates 500 NE Multnomah St., #950 Portland, OR 97232 RE: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MEETING - CITY OF TIGARD JOB NO. 4 -1276 -5802 Dear Neighbor: There will be an informational meeting on November 16, 1993 for a proposed development in your area, The proposal is to add a 25,000+ s.f, retail building to Washington Square along Greenburg Road, The meeting is to explain the proposal to neighbors of the project and answer your questions. It will be held at: W &I-I Pacific, Inc. 8405 SW Nimbus Avenue Beaverton, OR 97005 Phone No. 626 -0455 Contact: Michele Barstad We have enclosed a project location plan for your reference, If you have any questions or comments please plan on attending, Sincerely, W &I PACrFIC, INC, t,:<1??71/6CA' LA 13e119n1y, A.S.L.A. Project Planner jabe /nilb enclosure (503) 626.0455 Fax (503) 526.0775 Planning 6 Engineering *Surveying * Lanthcnpe Architecture • En' ironnientul Services PACIFK' 8405 S.W. Nimbus Avenue PO, Box 80040 Portland, OR 97280 November 1, 1993 Wescott G. Carpenter 2023 NE 42nd Avenue Portland, OR 97213 RE: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MEETING - CITY OF TIGARD JOB NO. 4-1216-5802 Dear Neighbor: There will be an informational meeting on November 16, 1993 for a proposed development in your area. The proposal is to add a 25,000+ s.f. retail building to Washington Square along Greenburg Road. The meeting is to explain the proposal to neighbors of the project and answer your questions. It will be held at: W&H Pacific, Inc. 8405 SW Nimbus Avenue Beaverton, OR 97005 Phone No, 626 -0455 Contact: Michele l3arstad We 'Pave enclosed a project location plan for your reference. If you have any questions or comments please plan on attending. Sincerely, W&H PACIFIC, INC. ,A,�'3lltny, A.S.L.A. Project Planner jabe /mlb enclosure (503) 525.0455 Fax (503) 526 -0775 Planning 4 Engineering • Surveying Landscape Architecture' Environmental Services 8405 SW. Nimbus Avenue P.O. Box 80040 Portland, OR 97280 November 1, 1993 Emily Louise Roe 13775 SW 6th Street Beaverton, OR 97005 RE: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MEETING - CITY OF TIGARD JOB NO. 4 -1276 -5802 Dear Neighbor: There will be an informational meeting on November 16, 1993 for a proposed development in your area. The proposal is to add a 25,000± s,f, retail building to Washington Square along Greenburg Roan. The meeting is to explain the proposal to neighbors of the project and answer your questions. It will be held at: W&H Pacific, Inc. 8405 SW Nimbus Avenue Beaverton, OR 97005 Phone No. 626 -0455 Contact: Michele Barstad We have enclosed a project location plan for your reference. If you have any questions or comments please plan on attending. Sincerely, W&H. PAe IC. INC. ( /�l`„/� 444 ellotny, Project Planner jabe /mib enclosure (503) 626-0455 Fax (50 y) 526.0775 planning e Engineering 4 Surveying Landscape Architecture « Environmental Services I • • |.' • , • ,. • EXHlBIT"H" AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING ' ' '—~ ~^ '~ ~^ '^^^^^~~^°~° STATE OFOREGON ) SS CITY OF TIGARD // Michele Burotad being duly sworn, depose and say that on November 1@199[}1 cmuaedtohavamal|edtmeechoftheperaonaonthaottaohodUstmnct|ceoY meeting to discuss a proposed development ataa____Grsmo6urg-gsL,^ Sousin dmcopyoYwh/ch'noUoaoorna|/od/oattaohadherotomndmademparto/horeof. 1 further state that said notices were enclosed in envelope:2 plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office at Main Branch , with postage prepaid thereon Beaverton Subscribed and sworn to before me this 8th day of ^m November 19 93 Notary ''~~'x ' ~~~ . ,4y/" My Commission Expires: __� � 01-FICIAL SEAL °"°pEn^,w LANE ,. 4 NOTARY Purim. OREGON COMMISSION EXPIRES 014216 ��S,=" xmxnm�1�X ' ° • ' • BARN/RETAIL CANYON FURNITURE, INC. 11295 SW 135TH AVENUE TIGARD, OR 97223 (COMMERCIAL) FRINGE LAND ORE L'ID. P.E. BOX 21545 SEATTLE, WA 98111 (COMMERCIAL) DAVID & LINDA HUDESMAN CO. TRS 3650 131ST AVENUE SE BELLEVUE, WA 98006 (COMMERCIAL) BARRY R MENASHE 6426 SW BEAVERTON HILLDALE HWY. PORTLAND, OR 97221 (COMMERCIAL) SEARS ROEBUCK, CO. 600 SIERRA MADRE VILLA AVE. PASADENA, CA 91107 (COMMERCIAL) US BANK P.O. BOX 8837 PORTLAND, OR 97208 (COMMERCIAL) WASHINGTON SQUARE INC. P.O. BOX 21545 SEATTLE, WA 98111 (COMMERCIAL) WASHINGTON SQUARE INC. P.C. BOX 10001 DALLAS, TX 75301 (COMMERCIAL) WASHINGTON SQUARE PLAZA P.O. BOX 422 FLORHAM PARK, NI 07932 (COMMERCIAL & VACANT) FRANKLIN COMMONS ASSOCIATES 00 NE MULTNOMAH ST., #950 ORTLAND, OR 97232 ( ;;OMMERCIAL) WESCOTT G CARPENTER 2023 NE 42ND AVENUE PORTLAND, OR 97213 (APARTMENTS) EMILY LOUISE ROE 13775 SW 6TH STREET BEAVERTON, OR 97005 (APARTMENTS) /If Name of applicant W &H Pacific, Inc. ' `ct Property: Tax Map and Lot # 1St 26C between tax lots 300,402, and 500 Aculess or General Location W. Greenburg R ad, South of Hall Blvd. on Washington Square Rd. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE I, Michele Barstad , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed Retail Space affecting the land located at W. Greenburg Road, South of Hall Blvd, , and did on the _ 1st day of November. 19 93 personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed or a Retail Space application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The slain was posted at Corner'of Greenburg Rd. & Washington Square Rd. (2 signs) (state location on property) This 1st day of November Subscribed and sworn to, affirmed, before me this day of November ,:i tit i_ ,,-;:?; .1. ....,4, /4. L....._ Notary Public forwttieSthte of Oregon -. My Commission Expires: _'fir r / C �,f, �; , t(IM6t:Ni.w 6, %.. \;; � :..�;� ttlbTAPIY puff, ft, , ,: coMMt;,81;;;1Y , , ocrAmissvil .1 z11 WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS or THE SIGN POSTING, RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 L tit .'I; 840 5,1v, Nimbus Avenue P.O. Box 80040 Portland, OR 97280 MINUTES OF MEETING PROPOSED RETAIL BUILDING WASHINGTON SO' 'ARE, TIGARD, OR. O'1 • HIBIT "K" A meeting was held on November 16, 1993 to present the subject project to the neighbors of the site. The meeting was held at the offices of W &H Pacific, at 8405 S. W. Nimbus Avenue, I3eaverton, OR. The property owners within a 250 foot radius of the site had been mailed notices of the meeting and signs had been posted on the site advising of the meeting. In addition the C. I. T. representative had been contacted to notify that group of the project and meeting. This meeting was combined with a similiar meeting for a proposed new restaurant building on Greenberg Road near the existing T. G. I. Fridays restaurant, Attending the meeting were: Mr. Randy Kyte /The Winmar Company (Washington Square) Mr. Richard McKay /RMM Corporation ( Cucina! Cucina! the restaurant operator) Mr. Wesley Zicker /W&H Pacific Mr. Gary Nelson/Property owner of Rubenstein's building Mr. Richard Nelson/Property owner of Rubenstein's building Ms. Patty Schafer /T, G. I. Friday's Ms. Rita Bergmans /T, G. I. Friday's Randy Kyle opened the meeting by presenting background of the proposed retail site, The site is one of the remaining out building sites on Washington Square. The site is a 2,5 acre area adjacent to and fronting on Greenberg Road at the northeast corner of Washington Square, It is adjacent to the existing Rubinstein's Furniture Store, The site is composed of parts of three tax lots and is occupied by an old block building used by the mall for maintenance and storage. The proposed building will contain about 25,(X)() sf and will be used for retail sales. No tenants have been identified at this time but it is possible that one user will occupy the entire building. A schematic site plan was presented which delineates the proposed building, required parking and landscape areas. Access is proposed to Greenberg Road, Washington Square Access Road #4, and to the new east parking lot on Washington Square. A median cut in the Access Road will be constructed to facilitate access from the mall without having to enter Greenberg Road, The attendees indicated approval of the proposed use, The Nelson's, who are owners of the Rubensteins site were in agreement with the proposal and felt that it would enhance the value of their building by cleaning up the ,Aopefty. There were some questions about the locations of the access to the mall and Mr. Kytey indicated that the exact location of the driveways would be studied further before the plans are finalized. Mr. Kyle indicated that construction of the building wo'ild depend on the timing of signing a lease with a tenant. Construction could possible begin as early as next March, but could be later. Since there were no further comments or discussing the meeting adjorned at. 8 :30. (503) b20 -0455 Fax (5 03) 526.0775 Planning 1 Engineering + Surveying i Landscape Architecture e Environmental Services • .,„ 11,30,93 10:00 FAN 20(3 223 4565 DATE: / / /6 S: }'EC() PI. ()P. INC. j002 CITY OF TIGARD PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES NON-REsIDENT/AL DEVELOPMENT APPLICANT 3 a .41 4 74- Phone: PROPERTY LOCATION: Address: Tax Map & Tax Lot: NECESSARY APPLICATION(6): Ars, to' •1 PROPOSAL DESCR/PTION: AGENT: 14,104' 217h/ Phone: ¶c 5 Cie ai EXHIBIT" /01,4$2 SAFF: ae. ‚-4 1 z-- Nj OOMPRESENSIVE PLAN DESIGUAT/ON: 6, ZONING DESIGNATION: —4 (XI .5cO) /L LzJ 1 . CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAM E-717;:ft CHAIRPERSO 4 / : -- N: J0, PHONE: '26? ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minim= lot Size: //4L sq. ft. Minim= lot width: L21_ ft. Setbacks: front ft. side 0 L. ft. rear garage 4;4_ ft corner ft. from utteet. , Maximum site coverage: 4,0)1.0 r.e c:0,"<"r ; ( 417-te ; Namiimum landscaped or natural vocetation area: 4tc . ..44W Maximum building height: ft, ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot frontage: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process, tots created as pert of a partition must have a stinitaum of 15 _feet of frontage or have a mAnimum 15 foot wide access easement. A/A Maximum lot depth to width ratio of 2.5 to 1. SPECIAL SETHACES Streets: ft. Hertablished ar'eas; rxnmr intensity totes: rom centerline of ,htco ftrn from ft.# along the ite's boundary aurtnnic mu= PROVIIIION$ tuildinglieight Exceptions (Code Section 18,98.020): guildings located in a non-residential Zend stay be built tO 4 height of 78 feet provided: 1. A maxixtrum rim (building floor Area to site area ratio) c 1,5 to 1 Will eXist:' 2. All autual building setbacks will be at least 1/2 the buildthg's height; And 3. The structure will not Abut a residential tone district. Page 1 • ••• 00 a„ 1 u : u 1 1.1.\ 200 22 :3 45(15 SAFE(;() PROP. INC. PAR,ICING AND AccES`' 400 71/ Required parking for this type of use: (10 :3 Secondary use required parking: . '7 f c s- r.2 .. , r `CD Vo more than 25% of rewired spaces may be deaignated and/or d.i.menaioned as compact °paces. paring utallt3 ahall be dimensioned an follows: .. Standard parking apace dimensions: 9 .1 ft. par' S � .,..- -�•w -- °.�.- ..,._ �•l,ti:.:<:,, � �,� �� J ;�i _ Compact parking space dimensione:(8.5 ft. X 15 ft-:<- Disabled parking All parking areas shall provide appropriately located ` on IsabLed person parking spaces. The minimum number of diaab1ed person parking epacea to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimeneiona,r are mandated by the Americana with Diazxbilitie> Act ( W2ij . A. handout to available upon request. A handicapped g symbol bo1 shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate on eha],1 be el f posted. �'�r.'a� -' r. r. 1•- .r,,7 „ti�—�r� .�4"c,rjfnrlF"i,� „„cycle racl.e are required for civic, tics-residential, commercial and developments iwt ich provide 15 or more parking spaces. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Bicycle parking spaces shall be provided on the basis atone space for eae 5 vrehicu ar�king_spaces 1 ; -''� � c � r r� :y,� ‹7 4,e, t..“,. All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queueing areas: 11 Minimum number of accesses: ,...�._.__.._. Minimum access width.: 24 feet Maximum access width: 4t.... Pedestrian access must be provided between building entrances and parking areas, outdoor cc mo ti- -an+i: pu lia_ dewalka and streets. A minimum of one tree for every seven pa rking '`a laces must be planted in and around e.ff —par rg`• - orsier.,_„ zo....previ.de a vegetatitre canopy effect. Landsdaped perking ,areas shall include special drtsigu features which effectively Screen the parking lot areaa from view. These design features may include the '1180 of landscaped berate, decorative. . ,4 ►. wciVad' s= , and raised planteru. 1,1,42(.64. .ty4PM t p Ira ti l ✓1 :? ""4.-'et 1 ( %✓1, Witt .61 vIe;14- , «a4,— ,%.10k 770,0411/ 464)6 pWLJ J loor detailed information desic u requLe , rte for 4arking areas and tit v4,0,4/.-.0o, accesses, see Developcuent Code Chapters 18.100, 18.108 and 18.10a, vxszoN ARBA the City requiraa that didAt vision areas be maintained between three and eight feet is height at read/driveway, read/railroad, and road/road i ntereectignd. The site of the required +dear vi>niori area depends upon the abutting atr t' S functional classification. Page 2 .:U1) 223 4565 SAFECO PROP,1NC, �J 004 BUFFERING AND SCREENING In order to increase privacy and to either reduce or eliminate adverae noise or viaual impact between adjacent developments, especially between different land when, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of vidth. Buffer arena must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen treee and shruba and cast also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal planting°. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkway). Additional information on required buffer area materials and Elites may be found in code Chapter 18.100. The required buffer widths which are applicable to your propo'al area: ft. along north boundary ft. along south boundary a ft. along east boundary ft. along west boundary In addition, eight obscuring ucreening ie required along (STREET TREES ''---------Ste-C-c-E".-treen ate required for all developments fronting on a public or private street as well as driveways which are more that 100 feet in length. street tree must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property withiti nix feet of the right-of-way boundary. Street treat) met have a minimum caliper of at least to inches when measured four feet above grade. Street trees should be °paced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the tree at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Divieion. (SIGNS s') permits count be obtained prior to installation of any sign in the City of Tigard' A °Guidelines for Sign Permite" handout la al-allable upon roquest. Additional sign area or height beyond code atan6ards may be poestitted if the eigra propoeal in reviewed as part of a dew:laymen*: review hpplication. Alternativelyr a Sign cede Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer. 41•••••■■••••••••03.11.0 SMSITIvit Code Chapter 18.84 providea regulations for lands which are p<rtentially unaultable far develapme.nt due to areas within, the 100-1/ear fleadplaini natural drainagewayet wetland area, on elopee in excess of 25 percent, or oti nnAtable ground. staff will attempt to preliminarily identity eseneitiVe lands areae at the pre-application conference bad an available ri =natio ri liME‘riate the resy‘onsibilitv to_pre.eiselnatif la_._ti_de_Asgl:,gj_L_sLtktas Olt boundatiee ie the responsibi. saftbg12p11capt. Are_t_its, meeting the definitione of sensitive lands must be clearl. indicated on, platy submitted with the devet an21.19Atipri. Page • • • •I I lo.00 t.AX ',WU 223 4565 SAVECO PROP. 1 NC. chapter 18.84 also Provides regulations for the use, protection, or modificatiori,of sensitive lands areas. In most cases, dedication of 100- yr. floodpiain areas to the City for park and open apace area is required as a condition of the approval of a development application. Pict- ' -14 1 r.,00? - ,16# '4 6 e per4 , m, w 1.) 21DDITI 7■ cONCERNS OR COMMENTS r A <461 42 A 1,•7 W ve? /415' 5,4 _..121„:t,A vt.ced5 ,i/-(;•.5.L3" / VC; i 4.; /; 44 .6 b r ad1/....7 V e e ) :40 a sA irij a Cl et, tl .5s-vid 5 a L1OV **1 fe) ; • c- t1.7 _ Ili a SehA (1, (.4. 6, 41 4 ,4 L.) er 11/ b 4,•i.4td . %1 PROcEDUrRE ay\ 4-it< f crt • $) 1,1 +1:' 7.4 r Administrative staff review.. .4 /60,17, .,40..,,,)4\ ..rb Public hearing before the Land UseJElearingi‘ Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Plannilv Commission with the Commineion making a recommendation on the proponal to the City Council. .„) An additional public hearing shall be held by the City _council. I- 1 ' L L-1 l'CciiLe 4t 144 .44A 4 i'% APPLICATXON SVEMITTAL PROCESS hll applications must be accepted by a Planning Division etaff member at the Community Development Department counter at City Hall. pInsg_EgTE: Applications stitbmitteAmallmArss214 at the counter without Planning Di:vied-on acceplmatmayltereturned, Applications submitted after 4:30 P.M. on Thursday will be batched for procenning with the following week's application.. Applications will NOT be aic922_te_ILafter 3:00 P.LiAkaM.onFtLar_4:30 on other dayl, 6-; 2/6' AIM/ 1Z 005 kiaps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5t11 inches. Onei5.5 inch by 11 inch map of a proposedpindggtehould be eubmitted for attach tt to the ntalf, report or administrative decision, unfolded mAPA.AhAll-n91-tP_A2q2Pt2012. The Planning Division Wad Vaigineering Division will preform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 10 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify an applicant if additional informatioa or additional copies of the aubarted ama:et-Lmln are needed. Vit „itietratiVe decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 dnyt after en application L accepted 64 being COmplete by the Planning Divinion. Application inrVolVing difficult or protracted issUOS or reqnizing review by other jurittactiond may take additional time to review+ Written recommendations froth the Planning staff are loaned .even (1) days prior to the pnblic hearing. X 10 day public appeal period follows all landtuee deoLnione. Au appeal on this AO matter would be heard by the el Pt i ; . '''''...t.tri......- . A basic flow chart which illuatrates t.r review proceed in available from the Planniaq Diviaton upon request. Page 4 • . • I 1 , 3U 83 10:04 PAX 206 223 4565 SAFF,C() PROP. 1 tC, Z008 This pre-application conference and the notes of the conference :ars intended to inform the preepective applicant of the primary Community Development code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to &thcuse the opportunities and oonatrainta affecting development of the gigs. The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good aite planning that ei ould apply to the development of your acite plan. Failure of the ataff to provide information required by the Code shall net ooastitece a Waiver of the applicable utandard. s or requirements. it is recommended that a prospeotive applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any question of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. Another pre- applicat ! sup -czar e cq in required if an application is to be submitted more than(,eix months after this pre - application conference, unless the second ca 'arenc� a is deemed unnecessary by the planning Division. PREPARED BY: PLANNING DIVISION( P.NONE : 639-4171 Page 5 0i\7 .J0 I u , U4 ! .1.t 2Uti 223 SAFE CO P ()P. 1 NC. PUBLIC FACILITIES The purpose of the pre—application conference is to: (1) Identify applicable Comprehensive plan policies and ordnance provisions; (2) To provide City etaff an opportunity to comment on ,specific concerns; and (3) To review the Land Use Application review process with the applicant and to identify who the final decision making authority shall be for the application. The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required tired au a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right -of -wa dedication: The City of Tigard requi.rea that land area be dedicated to the public: 1) to increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or 2) for the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application foa" this site will rewire right -of- way dedication for: 1. 2. 3. Strut 3..mprovemente t to feet from centerline. to , feet from cents line. to feet from centerline. 1. Z.., street improvements will be necessary along 2. otreet improvements will be necessary along 3. Street improvements tahA l,l include feet of pavement from centerline, plus the installation of curb and gutters, storm sewers, underground placement of utility wines (a fee may be collected if determined appropriate by the Bng,ixaeering Department) , a fire -foot wide sidewalk (sidewalk may be required to be wider on = y C ia1.n or major collector ,rstreetsi, or in the Central Business District), necessary street signs, streetlights, and a two year stteetlighting fed. %n some cased;, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are x.ht currently practical., the street'imprememento may be deferred. in such canes, a c ,n�ct.ttioa of development at li specified which requites the n �tpro�a,.i, may � property o rer (e) to execute a not- remonstrance agreement which waives the proper owner's) right to remonstrate tagainUit the formation of a local improvement diatt iot ford to improve ei70/4.-71 1 Page 6 /14-744 (.42424.46t ,11 24/4, "04n-a Z007 „ r • 11/30/93 1 0:05 FAA 206 2231 4565 SA1•'EC(l PROP. I NC. Pedeet i LIMAi : f brave+: CO 008 la.kpitary sewers: The nearest sanitary aewer ithe to this property is a(n) ? inch line which in located -.-� The proposed development dust be connected to a sanitary sewer. T a the developer's responaibility to extend the sewer along the eed development site's M w~ �'I1r�n�i,/�d✓ 741" 1 Ia G '47ater S ly: The Tigard Water District (Phone: 639- -1554) or the Tualatin Valley Water Diatrict (Phone: 642 -1511) proVidea public water service in the area of this site. The District should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proponed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Can Sir hill, 645 -8533) provides fire protection eervioes within the City of Tigard. The Dietrich should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Other Agency Permits:,,.,. .,.• • St 000.1 sew i.m • rovement STQRDER QUAL/1re FEES The Unified Sewerage Agency has established, and the city has agreed to enforce, I;teaolutian No. 90-43 Surface Water Management Regulations. which requires the construction of on -site water quality facilities. At the di-aeration of the City, the applicant may be offered an opportunity to pay a fee in lieu of the construction of such a facility. The resolution requi.rese the construction of a water quality facility and /or the payment of a fee Tho fee shall be based upon the amount Of impervious surface; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $285.00. The City of Tigard shall determine if a fee may be paid or a facility shall be constructed. .1%04. . ° �, Q„� - _._. ._ _ ...� ._.Y._.. �._.....�... �..w. 4/711121.1VIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide traffic Tit Fes (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Pee program collects feed from nest' development based on the development projected impact apron the City' e transportation item. the applicant 011411 be rrcguir .d t. o pay a fee based upon the number of tripe which are projected to reault from the proposed development. Thu calculation of the T•ir is balled on the pr ep eed Use of the 1a id, the adze of the project, and a general uwa based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the tittle of btii1din rmit iiattartce. In 1imi,tod circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the iesuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy la pertaitau3ble 9m12: when the TIF in greater than $5,000.00. 'v 4 j o Page 7 11/80/93 1 0: U6 PAX 206 228 4565 SA1-'EC.0 PROP, I NC„ 000 ENING PERMIT No k shall be preformed within a public right -of -moray, or shall cousin m until the applicant has obtained a street opening permit from the Department. FLOOR ELEVATIONS Al projects that require a grading plan also rE talre that the applicant s • submit a typical floor plan for each lot. This floor plan shall in. +' .te the elevations of the four corners of that plan along with elevat •ne at the corner of each lot. PREPARED 8Y: '' �" , ° ENGINEERING DrVISION PEONE: 639 -4171 RP» preapnon, r 11/30/W3 t. 10:07 FAX 206 223 4565 S,W1:CO PROP. I NC. »I®n APPEALS Director's Decision to Planning COmmission . $235.00 costs Planning Commission/Hearings Off. to Council . $315.00 4- transcript t BLASTING PE 7 S $125.00 COMPREHENSIVE HENS PLAN PROCESSING Text only, Map only„ or both $675.00 CONDITIONAL W.. USSE PROCESSING Conditional Use Review $3G5.00 FLMCIBLE SETRACIC STANDARDS $ 80.40 HISTORIC OVZLZkY DISTRICT $ 80.00 HONE OCCUPATION ee airyrp1 e'± .t . • . « r » . r ■ $ 50.00 -TYMIC ?44A1 $ 10.0G/ ' y!r INTERPRETATION ETATZON O1? COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE . n ., $ 55.00 by Community Development Department LAND PparaTioN Residential and Non-residential ntial « . LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $54.00 vh - -- ' �_ �- F�a��- i3E 'rl'>�A1:'Ml�l'I`�'Rt}�E.SS•L� .�.,..,..�_._.. .,._,...,._.� _..,- .�.... _.. Conceptual and detailed plan review $500,.00 SENSITIVE LADS Flood. plain $520.00 Wetlands /Steep slopes /Drainageway i r . . $235.00 SGN PERMIT $230.00 CODE EXCEPTIONS 0- 24 sq. ft. r $ 10.00 24'100 sq. Et. r . $ 25 00 100 4 sq. it $ 35.00 Terms racy s igns � » . $ 10.00 _ each s i gn ----SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW --�- ---�.. /Under $10.000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 80:.00 $ 10.000 - $ 99,999 $155.410 100,000 $499.999 _ $3g1�5.00 $ 500, 000 - $999, 999 M ♦ w $415 r 00 $1,000,000 car more $520.00 + $1 per $1.0, 000 . v $.x million not to exceed $2000 « SC) 8i7:)TS rC.�t`I P REaie LM1:d�Att�" •fir 5/ o r '" `- -. • ._.b Subdivision ivisLon Veriance, if needed . . . $105.00 rw TEMPORARY USE Director' Decision . . • . . . . . a . . . $ 50.00 0 Special exemption./Non-Profit . . $ -0 - TREE .EMO (AL PERMIT l . . w . . . $ -0 - VACATIONS ` Streets and public aces . . $300.00 deposit actual cost charged VARIANCE Administrative . . . . . i . r . . . . . . . . $86.00 • $QO . 0 0 Sign. ode .a 1. . . . . . . ♦ . $230.00 ZONE ML.I ANNEXATIONS ess than 10 acres . . . ♦ . . . - $520 . 00 rf 10 acres or wore . $G25- .00 ZONE c GGPRoCESSJN Less than 10 acres $520 .00 10 acres or wore . . . • . . $625.00 ZONE ORDI NANCE AM t0 i . . . . . . . $310.00 JOINT APPLICATION PAX FEg a r i Y l00t of highest planning fee plus lot OE ail additional planning ;Geis related to the propo:►al. 1_J 010 Afifigiyde_sv s9 6,-Wazdit/6 WO/ 1 1 , 30: u33 10:07 FAX 206 223 4565 SAVECO PROP. M, Z 01 1 CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST Staff `'741.8,,e Date // J �; The items on the checklist below are required for the successful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is rtlquired to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be brought and submitted with all other materials at the time you submit your application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call Planning at 639-417L BASIC MATERIALS A) 8) C) 0) E) r) (G)-'? (ld) /Filing fee r ($ `� ,✓� SPECIFIC TE RIALS!,.er!- Application form (1 copy) Owner's signature /written authorization Title transfer instrument Assessor's map Plot or site plan Applicant's statement •..• L110,. ).F, S Pt f' •1 ;,Ki0t1i L. I•14''Jlc►1 .% A) Site Information showing. (No. of copies _L5 1) Vicinity Map 2) Site size & dimensions 3) Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10%) 4) Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds 5) Locations of natural hazard areas including: a) Floodplain areas b) ,Slopes in excess of 25Z c) Unstable ground d) Areas with high seasonal water table e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils Location of resource areas as shown an the Comprehensive Map inventory including: a) Wildlife habitats b) Wetlands Other site features: a) Rock outcroppings . wa b) Trees with 6M + caliper measured 4 feet from ground level 8) Location of existing structures and their uses 9) Location and type of on and offsite noise sources 10) Location of existing Utilities and easements 11) Location of existing dedicated right -of --ways B) Site Oevelppment Planes showing (Non of copies /5 ) 1) The proposed site and surrounding properties 2) Contour line intervals " 3) The location, dimensions and names of all :" a) Existing & platted stteets s S other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining properties ITEMS TO BE INCLUDED: APPLICATION CHECKLIST - Page 1 C3 W C3 C3 14/4 IJ 11/30/93 10:08 PAX 206 223 4565 SAFEC() PR()P.1.NC. b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements on the site. I; c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension 4) The location and dimension of: a) Entrances and exits on the site b) Parking and circulation areas c) Loading and services areas d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation e) Outdoor common areas, f) Above ground utilities 5) The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site 6) Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream ,conditions 7) Sanitary sewer facilities 8) The location of areas to be landscaped 9) The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques 10) The location of mailboxes 11.) The location of all structures and their orientation 12) Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements C) Gradin Plan (No. of copies ) The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1) The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating general contour lines, slope ratios and soil stabilization proposals, and time of year it is proposed to be done. " 2) A stacement from a registered engineer supported by data factual al substantiating: a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposals c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated or 0) ArchYtectural tar (No. of copies /L- ): t • The site development plan propotal shall. include; 1) . Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures proposed for use on -site and 2) Typical elevation drawings of each structure, E') landscape Plan (No. of copies r The landscape plan shall be dram at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a lrirget- scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1) Description of the irrigation system where applicable 2) Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings APPLICATION CHECKLIST page 2 17j.)012 11/30/93 1 0:09 PAX 206 223 4565 SAPEC() PROP. 1 NC. j 01 ;! 3) Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas and common open spaces 4) Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials. The landscape plan shall include a narrative which addresses: 1) Soil conditions. [ ] 2) Erosion control measures that will be used. [ a C] C3 F), Sign Drawirogs Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of the Code as part of Site Deuelopment Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct the sign. ( G) Traffic eneration estimate H) PralimAnar-X partitioLMAot lire adjustment showing (N o . o f Copies _ I ) : 1) The owner of the subject parcel C 2) The owner's authorized agent 3) The map scale, (20,50,100 or 200 feet=l), inch north arrow and date 4) Description of parcel location and boundaries 5) Location, width and names of streets, , easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel 6) Location of all permanent tauildings on and within 25 feet of all property lines 7) Location and width of all water courses 8) Location of any trees with ' 6" or greater caliper at 4 feet above ground level 9) All slopes greater than 25% 10) Location of existing utilities and utility easements 11) For major land partition which creates a public street: a) The proposed right-of-way location and width b) A scaled cross-section of the proposed street plus any reserve strip 12) Any applicable-deed restricts ores 13) Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable e G e• .fret 3G C] CAT- X) Subdivision Pre li.miraary .Plat tip and data showing(No. of Copies 1) Scale e- ,staling 30,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch and limited to one phase per sheet t J 2) The proposed name of the subdivision r [, ] 8) Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets C ] Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner developer, engineer, surveyer, designer, as applicable(; ] Date of application 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided C 3 Names of adjacent subd& ii.sion.or nacres of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of unsubdivided land Contour lines related to a City - established bench- mark at 2- foot intervals for 0-10% grades greater than 10% APPLICATION C11E`Ct{LIST * Page 3 [ 3 " C3 ,4,' 11/30/93 1 0. 1 0 VAX 208 223 4565 (Z362P /oo28p) SAPECU PROP.1NC. 9) The purpose, location, type and size oF all of the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision) ; C ] a) Public and privzte right -of -ways and easements [ b) Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines C a c) Domestic water mains including fire hydrants [ 3 d) Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) C 3 a) Watercourses C 3 f) Deed reservations for parks, open space, pathways and other land encumbrances C 3 10) Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated [ 3 11) Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and fire hydrants. C ] 12) Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the prrpose'l subdivision. [ 3 13) Scaled cross sections of proposed street right-of-way; [ ] 14) The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow [ 3 15) Location, width and direction of flaw of all water- courses and drainage ways [ 3 16) The proposed lot configurations, approx icaate lot dimensions and int numbers. Where 1os s are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots [ 3 17) The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level, and the location of proposed tree plantings, if any [ 18) The existing uses of the property, including the location of all structures And the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting [ 19) Supplemental information including: a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) C b) Proof of property ownership . C 3 c) A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements [ 3 20) Existing natural features including rock out- cr•oppings, wetlands and marsh areas. C 3 21) If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application. Other Information . . t. [3 (3 APPLICATION CH 'CKLIST page 4 5014 EXHIBIT •'P° LtiliaS 1L341:1 '0.0000 588"05'00" E .0287.43' – – - mod 'bee), "ra tg's' ,..,(.4 • , i s. , .:, ... •a ' 1‘1.88'05'00"W a .4 • e "•.a 287.55' . ��, .. .� • a ►,d a all ' a if 4N88b5'Ob "W ` "p ��+. . 287.68 -- -`�i w' -- 147.90' L.. — N86'05'00 "W ►, i .d d d, • 1d 41.,284,33-7- 'd 284.J3' m J ►� . A "A nA 44 4. d SA 'o pA . a °A. • , S N88'55'05"w ; °�`.'dt 235.781' –�---- 1 V TENTATIVE PROPERTY LINE ADJUSTMENT TAX LOTS .100, 402 AND &X. or TAX MAP 1S 1 26C, IN THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 26, T. 1 S., E?. 1 W., W.M. WINMAN IJACIP1C MUZAK OREGON 1S126C0 -00100 MENASHE, R BARRY 6426 SW BVTN -HIL LSDALE HWY PORTLAND OR 97221 1S126C0 -, ,.00 NELSON, fiARY E % CANYON FURNITURE INC 11295 SW 135TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 1S126C0 -00300 WASHINGTON SQUARE INC PO BOX 21545 SEATTLE WA 98111 1S126C0 -00401 FRINGE LAND ORE LTD PO BOX 21545 SEATTLE WA 98111 18126G0 -00402 ..Y WASHINGTON SQUARE INC PO BOX 21545 SEATTLE WA 98111 1S126C0 -00500 WASHINGTON SQUARE INC PO BOX 21545 SEATTLE WA 98111 1S126C0 -01107 WASHINGTON SQUARE INC PO BOX 21545 SEATTLE WA 98111 18126C0 -01900 CRESCENT GROVE CEMETERY ASS CRESCENT GROVE CEMETERY 00000 1S126B0 -02400 BEIM & JAMES PROPERTIES II 4700 BOHANNON DR #101 MENLO PARK CA 94025 1S126DC -00901 GETHSEMANE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH 9640 SGT GREENI3URG RD PORTLAND OR 97223 181,26C0- -01109 WASHINGTON SQUARE INC BY JC PENNEY CO PO BOX 10001 DALLAS TX 75301 1S126BO -02200 BEIM & JAMES PROPERTIES II 4700 BOHANNON DR #101 MENLO PARK CA 94025 18126DC -00900 ROE, EMILY LOUISE 13775 SW 6TH BEAVERTON OR 97005 18126DC -00902 ...••.... CARPENTER, WESCOTT G 2023 NE 42ND AVE PORTLAND OR 97213 1S126DB- »02800 FRANKLIN COMMONS ASSOCIATES 500 NE MULTNOMAH #950 PORTLAND OR 97232 18126DB -02900 .. LEGACY HEALTH SYSTEM ATTN: LARRY HILL 500 NE MULTNOMAH ST PORTLAND OR 97232 FILE NO: SDR 93 -0025 FILE TITLE: W & H Pacific /Washington Square APPLICANT: W & H Pacific, Inc. PO Box 80040 Portland, OR 97280 (503) 626 -0455 OWNER: Washington Square, Inc. PO Box 23623 Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: A request for Site Development Review for a 25,000 square foot retail building on a 2.38 acre site in the Washington Square Shopping Center. LOCATION: 9835 SW Greenburg Road (WCTM 181 26C, tax lots 300, 402, and a portion of 500) APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.42, 18.62, 18.100, 18.106, 18.114, and 18.120. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zone provides development sites for major retail goods and services. CIT: East CIT FACILITATOR: Joel Stevens CHECK ALL WHICH APPLY: X STAFF DECISION PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME :, HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME :r_,,,,__ CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: THE FOLLOWING ATTACHMENTS ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING It THE PLANNING DIVISION: X VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPING PLAN NARRATIVE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SITE PLAN OTHER :___,. I a ■• • PACIFIC 8405 S,W, Nimbus Avenue P,O. Box 80040 Portland, OR 97280 CITY OF TIGARD DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION FOR: A 25,000 S.F. RETAIL LEASE SPACE AND 125 PARKING SPACES AT WASHINGTON SQUARE TIGARD, OREGON DECEMBER 15, 1993 PREPARED BY: W&H PACIFIC, INC. P.O. BOX 80040 PORTLAND, OR 97280 (503) 626-0455 CONTACT: WES ZICKER, PROJECT MANAGER PREPARED FOR: WASHINGTON SQUARE, INC. by WINMAR COMPANY, INC. P.O. BOX 23635 TIGARD, OREGON 97223-0095 (503) 639-8860 CONTACT: RANDY KYTE VICE PRESIDENT (503) 626-0455 Fax (503) 526-0775 Planning Engineering a Surveying 6 Landscape Architecture 6 Environmental Services d , tr j. •■ (- PACIFIC 8405 S.W. Nimbus Avenue P.O. Box 80040 Portland, OR 97280 EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT 13 EXHIBIT C EXHIBIT D EXHIBIT E EXHIBIT I EXHIBIT 0 EXHIBIT H EXHIBIT I EXFIIBIT EXHIBIT K EXHIBIT L EXHIBIT M EXHIBIT N EXHIBIT 0 EXHIBIT P INDEX TO EXHIBITS SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION APPLICATION FEE VERIFICATION OWNERS AUTHORIZATION COPY OF TITLE REPORT TAX MAP APPLICANTS STATEMENT COPIES OF INFORMATIONAL MEETING LETTERS AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING COPY OF AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING COPY OF DRAWING SUBMITTED W/MAILING MINUTES OF INFORMATIONAL MEETING COPY OF INFORMATIONAL MEETING SIGN-UP SHEET TRAFFIC REPORT GEOTECHNICAL REPORT COPY 014 PRE-APP PACKET LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT EXHIBIT (503) 626-0455 Fax (503) 526-0775 Planning Engineering * Surveying • Landscape Architecture • Environmental Services • Fl41aeJeke( REQUEST FOR COMMENTS FROM: Tigard Planning Department DATE: _December 23 1993 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 93-0025 W & H PACIEIC1WASUINGTON SQUARE LOCATION: 9835 SW Greenburg Road (WCTM 1S1 26C, tax lots 300, 402, and a portion of 500). A request for Site Development Review for a 25,000 square foot retail building on a 2.38 acre site in the Washington Square Shopping Center. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.42, 18.62, 18.100, 18.106, 1.1146 and 18.120. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C-G zone provides development sites for major retail goods and services. Attached is the Site Plan and applicants statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Jan. 3, 1994. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond b the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions rega.ding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 - 4171. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: of our office. Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: L1,.30/63 1 0: 1 1 FAX .06 223 4565 1. SAPEC() PROP. 1 NC. 2. Crrt DEPARTMENTS Sanding 0UiCialtDave S. • i Recorder i. k'e t x 1 ili %Viola C. 3. SPECIAL D19213 8 ,_,,,[t c."' f iia District (Pick-ap box) t - 'WTigard Water District -""' 6777 SW Burnham at. Tigard, OR 97223 Tualatin Valley Water District 6501 SW Taylor* Perry Rd. Tigard, OAR 97223 4. AFFECT= atnasoIcrlons Wash. Co. I.an4 Owe 4 150 N. ri.rat Awe. Hillsboro, OR 97124 Brent Curtis ---- Ravin Rav i.n tt&rtiai Hike Dorrasoa Scott Ring Prod Eberle 'frmwep. City of Hammertoe JIM 6aeund.ry t - Principal Planner '6e*vertc n, OR 97076 City of Xing City city Manager 3.5300 SW 116th Ring City, 0R 97224 City of Lake Oswego City lialukcear 380 64 A Lake Oswego1 OR 97034 iftnte Hi.gi y Division bob ..__... Doran Pd Box 25412 Portland, OR 97225 -0417 5. 5I'CX.8L ARENCIES Office Cabana Telepbosus En PO Bold 23416 gineering TAgard, OR 07201 -3416 WU tazdral C.t* "....`.. Scott kaiser 22.0 $ Second Me. ti'aactlaad, OR 97209 %VI Cable/elation of dragon WWI Wairick 3540 DV Dodd St. Portland, OR 97201 Coldaataie Cable (Prank Strode) 14200 15 +t lit ttom.a. ., Ct. 114414x t44, 09 9/005 6. =O t A4101=1.6 jaumulimitirS Div. (tom) Divia.iraai of State tubas onalisamo ""•� P'ioh Wildlife 14.8. PAX) vud = bap'. di An*itc0. Quality 7 : PS09 9.87 hasActel cord. ct kAAiuoara Poet Office G. 01 Parkao 4 Iselcrestion Board -4"� 141e Opa atlaaea Scbba1 Dint 80. 46 Q Soavaeamen) Jay Pab1 PO Boot 2(30 vartae, OR 97075 school Dint. 23.7 (Tigard) 13137 SW Pacific Hwy. Tigard„ OA 97223 Unified Sewerage AQ0UC3 /sWK program - 155 .D. P3:at at. a llidnoro, OR 973.24 60uaulez7 Coo iimaicai - '205(1 stark Roos 530 Partl4r14, 08 97204 YVTRrl - cREERSPACES P10GRAH - Mel. Rule (C PA'a /ZOA's) 600 mE Cr. nd Portland. OR 97232 -2736 AY.CD (CPA'n /LOA'a) `---* 1175 Court St. NE halos, alt 97310 -0590 C'kar C".t3 of Durham tiaarowgor Pb Dak 23493 -3493 Tigard, 09 972/4 C.i ty of Portland - Planning, Director 1120 SW 5th artland, OR 97204 - Lidwien Aahmaun 9002 5t McLoughlin b1ird. ltilwaukie, OR 97222 City oC Tualatin '-- Pd Bra 369 Tualatin, Oa 07062 t/ Portland Cameral Elec. Arian 14655 SW Old Scholia Pry. teavertoo, on. 97007 Metro Arta Coansroicatious Jambe Dewitt Twin 0*ka Technology 3.ogy Canter 1815 SK 169th Place g -64020 Deseertba, 014 97006 -409.6 pdt US tAest Pet* lialsen 421 SW Oak Sit. a . 40t-ltst4.ad, OR 91204 Tti -fleet treu it Dev. 4012 OR 12th Ave. Portland, OIL 91202 D0r.11t7: southern Pacific Traiutsvott*t,i i Coupany bSteno it Pottery, P3S w tarojuct kastiudwar 800 kg 6th Ave nu , A. 3240 Stalbd stat,.i0tt i'ctrtl.a Id, OR. 97209 42)01" • • • • • • ,.-111,1)kr 4 1 j 1 1 4.11•,.0 1 II 11 1 JI 1 H L c*,t14. 11,1 Cn it ,', t t - '; t(-41141 /till 3 fj. 1,4,11t) ) l V t I Oil v, 11 HilP Ill 1,4:4 It ill r 1 1k !If) VA I 1P1 iJIP.it • vs; V:- t 4141 .t 11-,N ol o ) rt, it, 4v 1\. f 1 :y .1■•••■•■••••••••••••■■••■•4 I• 43 • 0 May 12, 1999 Langly Properties, LLC Attn: Randy Kyte, Senior Vice President 1417,110611Avenue NE, Suite 202 ,Bdilovue, WA 98004 RE: 9386SW Greenburg Road/SDR 93-0026 Dear Mr, Kyte: CITY OF TIGARD OREGON This letter is to confirm that the above-referenced Site Development Review (SDR) approval is still valid, A review of the file indicates that a determination was made in August 1996 that substantial construction of the project had occurred before the expiration date of the original SDR approval, You may, therefore, proceed with the project as approved without any additional planning review. However, any change ,q to the approved plan will require Minor or Major Modification review as provided by TMC 18.360,050-060. Also, please be advised that you must re-apply for all applicable site and building permits since these have expired. If you have any further questions, please call me at 503-639-4171 x315. Sincerely, Mark J. Roberts Associate Planner ilcurpinkmark\sdrIsdr93.25,mir.letter.doc 0: SDR 08-0025 Land us MO 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TOD (503) 684-2772 ....■■•■•••••■■•01.1. ..001011.0101.. 4 July 9, 1997 tAt Jimmy Bellomy/ASLA, Project Manager W & H Pacific, Inc. 8405 SW Nimbus Avenue Beaverton, OR 97008-7120 :.1.f411,q„.teLitA' \,t\ 1ig■'1".. Ali CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Re: Minor Modification to the Washington Square New Retail Site. Land Use File No.: Site Development Review (SDR) 93-0025 Dear Jimmy: This letter is in response to your request for a Minor Modification to the new retail site at 9385 SW Greenburg Road. The Modification request was to revise the approved building location and add 800 square feet to the approved floor plan. The Director has approved this request as submitted. Please submit a copy of this letter with any application for building permits. If you have any questions concerning this information, feel free to contact me at (503) 639-4171. Sincerely, Mark Roberts Associate Planner, AICP McurpinAmark_rAwashsci,doc c: SDR 93-0025 land use file 13125 SW Hall 81vc1., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 1D (503) 684-2772 • A 1 PACIFIC 8405 S,W, Nimbus Avenue Beaverton, OR 97008 -7120 June 9, 1997 Mr. Mark Roberts City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd, Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: MINOR MODIFICATION REQUEST - WASHINGTON SQUARE RETAIL CITY OF TIGARD FILE NO.'S S]DR 93 -0025, MIS 94 -0002, MIS 94 -0003 W &H PACIFIC FILE NO. 1276-6002 Dear Mark: Per your note addressed to us June 5, 1997 (copy attached) T am providing you the additional information you requested. Enclosed you will find the following: 1, $100,00 review fee for Minor Modification 2. Exhibit "A" - Or; Ovally approved Site Plan 3. Exhibit "B" - Proposed Modified Site Plan 4. Exhibit "C" - Addendum to traffic report prepared by Kittelson & Associates As you are aware, this is a request to modify the original site plan by adding an additional 800 S.F. of floor space to the general retail development and to also shift the location of the building. We have addressed, as requested, City of Tigard Code section 18.120.070 and our responses are as follows: 18.120.070 Major Modification `a A a roved Plains or Existing Development A. An applicant may request approval of a modification of an approved plan or existing development by: 1. Providing the Director with three copies of the proposed modified site development plan; and RESPONSE: Three copies of the proposed modified plan have been submitted. 2. Narrative which indicates the rationale for the proposed modification addressing the changes listed in subsection B below. 1 (503) 626 -0455 Fax (503) 526 }0775 Planning • Engineering • Surveying 6 Landscape Architecture B. The director shall determine that a major modification(s) will result if one or more of the following changes are proposed. There will be: RESPONSE: The following is the narrative addressing 18.120.070.B. 1-11. 1. An increase in dwelling unit density, or lot coverage for residential development; RESPONSE: Does not apply. This development is not a residential development. 2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units; RESPONSE: Does not apply. This development is not a residential development. 3. A change that 'equires additional on -site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.106; RESPONSE: The original approval granted 125 total parking spaces (see exhibit "A") and the relocation of the building on the site now allows for 135 total parking spaces. The additional 800 S.T'. does not require any additional parking that has not already been approved,. 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code; RESPONSE: The modification of the site plan does not change the type of commercial structure as defined by the Uniform Building Code. 5. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20 percent; RESPONSE: The approved building height is not changing. 6. A change in the type and location of access ways and parking areas where off -site traffic would be affected; RESPONSE: The modifier tion does not affect off-site traffic. Access to off -site traffic remains the same. 7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and the ; ncrease can be expected to exceed 20 vehicles per day; RESPONSE: Attached as exhibit "C" is a letter from Kittelson & Associates addressing the vehicular traffic. This addendum to the original report clearly shows that less than 10 total trips (in and out during weekday PM peak hours are generated by the modification. 8. An increase in the floor area proposed for a nonresidential use by more than 10 percent excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet; RESPONSE: The proposed increased floor area is for an additrnonal 4%of floor area. 9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space which reduces the open space area below the minimum required by this code or reduces the open sp•,re area by more than 10 percent; RESPONSE: Does not apply. Open space is not reduced by more than 10 %. 10. A reduction of project amenities below the minimum established by this code or by rnorw than 10 percent where specified in the site plan: a. Recreational facilities; b. Screening; and /or c. Landscaping provisions; and RESPONSE: Project amentites are not reduced by this modification. All setbacks, landscaping and screening requirements will be met as originally conditioned by the City of Tigard. 11. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of site development review approval which are not the subject of B. 1 through 10 above this subsection, RESPONSE: Does not apply. We are not requesting a modification to any of the original conditions of approval from casefCle no. SDP, 93 -0025. 3 Plea ^e review the attached at your earliest convenience and notify us of your decision. Please do not • hesitate to call for additional information or clarification. Jimmy B ellomy, A.S,L.A' Project Manager Attachments cc: File I:\project \1 2766001\wpdatu \0605Cplt,ltr 06-06 -91 02:54PM PROM KITTELSON & ASSOC, June 2, 1997 Hal Keever W&H Pacific 8405 SW Nimbus Avenue Beaverton, OR 97008 TO W &H PACIFIC - PORTLAND P002 /003 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING /TRAFFIC ENGINEERING no S,W, ALDER, SUITE 700 • PORTLAND, OR 97205 • (503) 229,& 10 O FAX (603) 273.3i 9 RE: SW Greenburg Road/SWHall Boulevard Retail Store Project #: 'W' &H -1276 -6002 KAT - 2372 Pursuant to your request, Kittelson & Associates, Inc. has reviewed the November 19, 1993 traffic study that analyzed the impacts associated with the addition of a 25,000 square foot retail store located on the southwest corner of the SW Oreenburg Road /SW Hall Boulevard intersection in Beaverton, Oregon, and compared it to the impacts associated with the addition of a 25,800 square foot retail store proposed for the same location, This letter documents the findings from the cor iparison, TRIP GENERATION Trip generation estimates for the 25,000 square foot retail store identified in the November 1993 report were developed from empirical observations at other similar developments, Thesis observations are summarized in the standard reference manual Trip Generation, 5th Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Trip generation estimates for the proposed 25,800 square foot, retail store were developed using the same trip characteristics. Due to the close proximity of the site relative to Washington Square, a conservative assumption of five percent drop - in trips and 25 percent internal trips was used. Table 1 below compares the estimated weekday pail. peak hour trip generation characteristics for the 25,000 square foot retail store as reported in the November 1993 report and for the proposed 25,800 square foot retail store, LL 1J t3: C;1PROJF1,t., \`IVIANWASH'SQUANVx D 06 -06 -97 02:544PM PROM KI.TTELSON ASSOC, Mr. Kees «yr June 2 1997 TO WWI PACIPIC- PORTLr M P003 /003 Pmf ect: 0127e -60;1V Pag:2 Table 1- Tri Generation Description Si Proposed Retail Store ( May 1997) Less Drop -in Trips (5%) Less Internal Trips (25 %) Daily Trips weekday PM J citk flour Trips Out 25,800 955 45 235 95 50 45 5 5 <5 20 10 10 Net New Trips Previous Study ( Nov. 1993) Less Drop -in Trips (5 %) Less Internal Trips (25 %) Net New Trips 70 35 35 920 90 45 45 45 5 5 <5 ' 230 20 10 10 NET DIFFERENCE 800 sf 30 65 30 35 As shown in Table 1, the additionu of 800 square feet of retail will result in approximately an additional 30 daily trips, of which five trips will occur during the weekday p.m, peak hour. Based on Washington County's standards, an increase of less than ten vehicle trip ends for a development is considered an insignificant amount on the transportation system. Thus im ,acts related to dew vel ment of an additional 800 square feet of retail store are ne ii blc. ............. CONC U&ION Based on the results of the trip generation comparison, the addition of 800 square feet of retail store size will have minimal, if any, impacts on the surrounding transportation system. I hope this letter adequately addresses the transportation- related issues associated with thr, proposed retail store located on the southwest corner of the SW Greenburg Road/SW Hall aoulevard intersection in Beaverton, Oregon. If there are any additional questions or concerns you limit) regarding t tis analysis, please give one af us a call. Sincerely, KIT EL aON & ASSOCIATES, INC. eAttuti--- Dan Seeman Brandon N'evets Project Principal Traffic Analyst K/tt9/sof t Aa.90clata% /r C Port/and, t r A • Uj ' 1 et \ bZi R 10' 11111 GREENBURG ROAD 240 4. RE ,VL CENTER 25,000 S.F. db 10mr•a4 711 Ia II 0 .. Mr +.r 0 . .ter 0 w. 0.0.or a. M..onowr w. M 0n000m. _ M ..■ ai r r . 1 Lo rs• awl _Q Cr 00.00 • ACCESS ROAD NO. PLANNING EXISTING PARKING LC)T PLOT PLAN EXHIBIT MAP ♦ 0 0+000 ..-.. o.. w ,0.0.00....0.4 +..- .+.. —r+.wi • L; CASE No. s611 93-0025 At. ,CENT # 2 MY 30 '87 14,24 FROM:WPH ARCHITECT PC r • • • tv SHEMISOS Mgv T -873 P.02 /0 F -257 Z. y let 5 Mi • • w A 5.3 TER 1 GPO SF • tN 51 g of 1 g rsn g'OO,'VOOI j • A • 41tVDL1, 3O AtXO • hen V80 cOS4/0 74:00 L6 l• PACIFIC 8405 S.W. Nimbus Avenue Beaverton, OR 97008 =7120 June 2, 1997 Mr. Mark Roberts City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon RE: Pouf -its Fax Note 7671 Date 6 ! " pa°ges°` r To From Co Co/Dept. / 6 ..._ "'¢e e I r Phone # ei_ _ o �-^ 5 Phone # / - Fax # ,5,2 4.... D 7z Fax # ._ Minor Modification Request- Washington Square Retail SDR 93 -0025 MIS 94 -0002 MIS 94 -0003 Dear Mark: Per our discussion two weeks ago I am requesting a minor modification (if required) to the above referenced case files. The modification request is potentially needed because the building is slightly larger than originally approved. The proposed building is 800 S.F. larger (4%). In addition, the building is in a slightly different location. Please refer to the attached sketch. As you know, Winmar received a permit to construct the parking lot portion of this project last July. Conditions 2, 3, 5, 7, and 10 -18 of the approvals were satisfied last year with, the parking lot permit. Conditions 1, 4, 6, 8, and 9 will be addressed at such time we submit for permit on the building and minor revisions to the parking area. Should you need further information or a fee please call me. Thank for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, &HP CIFIC,INC. Hal Keever, ASIA Principal cc: Randy Kyte John Wright Doug Bates 1.\ project112766002 \wpdata\raberts.ltr vt,g,ed ilk-a- 6%5 CO6 c-eie_. fdd ±-o.) C.cktobtehttik, trz',U L U) lake, 11 t(415 ttaut;eLtl'inect5 3 v A)1 ,ou,> t *ltI 4iti it .t ko-w "- 6.6 z o CIPAT Mg I a. (503) 626 -0455 Fax (503) 526 -0775 Planning Engineering * Surveying 6 Landscape Architecture ■ STATE OF OREGON County of Washington City of Tigard e depose and say: AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING ) ) ss. , being first duly sworn /affirm, on oath (Please print) I am a , 2 for C� -4-I1i 6,S16-NeutA4 The City of Tigard, That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: 1% That I served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: i- City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Planning Commission Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard City Council Oregon. for A copy (Public Hearing Notice /Notice of Exhibit "A ") was mailed to each named attached list marked exhibit "B" on the said notice NOTICE OF DECISION as hereto bulletin board on the," day of in the United States Mail on the postage prepaid. Decision) of which is attached (Marked persons at the shown o jale cit. day of attached, was posted on n appropriate 19 ; and depos ed 19` i r Prepared Notice Sube 19 ibed and sworn /affirm to me on the L. ' gyp,��11,p/�w'n�Y�uuyyrr'•, MANE NOTARY PtiBLIOA1)1(le' -1 wv COMMISSION NO< :7 MY COMMISSION tXPIR S 1fi., day of NOT Y PUBLIC OF 0.0 .OIL My Commission Ej p' res: Exit u 1 CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 93-0025 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT MIS 94 -0002 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT MIS 94 -0003 WASHINGTON SQUARE INC. - OWNER W & H PACIFIC - APPLICANT APPLICATION: A request for approval. of Site Development Review and two Lot Line Adjustments for a 25,000 square foot general retail building. Comprehensive Plan: General Commercial (C -G), Zoning: General Commercial (C -G) Location: 9835 SW Greenburg Road (WCTM 1S1 360C, Tax Lots 300, 402 and a portion of 500) SECTION I - DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director's designee for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. 1. The site plan and/or floor plan shall be revised to provide a minimum of five bicycle parking racks. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 2. The applicant shall maintain as much of the stand of trees adjacent to Access Road #4 in place as possible. An arborist report shall prepared which reviews preservation of a portion of the stand of trees adjoining Access Road #4 in place. The report shall review the trees with a revised site plan showing the 19 parking spaces along Access Road #4 as having been deleted. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 3. The applicant shall obtain a tree removal permit prior to removal of any trees on site in excess, of six inches or more as measured four feet above ground level, STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division, 4. The applicant shall revise the site plan to include pedestrian access to the site from SW Greenburg Road and Access Road #4. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 5. The landscape plan shall be revised to provide tree specimens of sufficient size within the clear vision areas such that no branch or limb shall be less than eight feet in height. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 93 -0025 - W & H PACIFIC Page 1 6. The site plan shall be revised to prvovide a minimum of one additional parking spaces designed and designated to serve disabled persons. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 7. The driveway access shown on the submitted site plan shall be deleted pursuant to the access standards set forth by the Washington County Transportation Planning Department or as otherwise approved. Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 8. The applicant shall comply with the Conditions of Approval set forth by Washington County or as otherwise approved in the project review response dated Janaury 7, 1994 and as reviewed under Agency comments. Mark Roberts, Planning Division, 9. Upon completion of the two proposed Lot Line Adjustment applications an additional Lot Line Adjustment shall be filed for thf; site to consolidate the two remaining parcels, STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 10. Additional right -of -way shall be dedicated to the Public along the SW Grenberg Road frontage to increase the right -of -way to a minimum of 49 feet from centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department, STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department, 11. The applicant shall provide street lighting along SW Greenberg Road in accordance with City standards. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department, 12. Sidewalks shall be constructed along the site frontage on SW Greenburg Road and on Access Road #4. The sidewalk may be designed along a meandering route so as to save the existing trees. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department. 13. A final grading plan shall be submitted showing the existing and proposed contours, A soils report shall be provided detailing the soil compaction requirements, STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department: 14, The applicant shall provide an on -site water quality facility as established under the guidelines Of Unified Sewer Agency Resolution and Order No. 91 -47. The final grading plan shall be modified to include biofiltration swales. The maintenance of the swales shall be the responsibility of Washington Square, STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department. NO'T'ICE OF DECISION SDR 93-0025 W & I°fi PACIFIC Page 2 15. The applicant shall demonstrate that the downstream underground system in the Washington Square Area will not be unduly affected by the increase in. run -off. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department. 16. The applicant shall underground utilities along SW Greenburg Road between the site's northerly property line and Access Road No. 4 to Washington. Sqaure, or pay the fee in lieu of undergrounding. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department. 17. All existing underground utilities must be removed and capped at an approved location. STAFF CONTACT: David Scott, Building Department. 18. The entire existing building (including foundations) must be removed. Any remaining excavation must be filled with compacted fill. STAFF CONTACT: David Scott, Building Department, THE FOLLOWING CONDITION OF APPROVAL SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS. 19. All site improvements shall be installed pursuant to the approved plans which shall reflect the modifications required by these Com'itions oP Approval. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. IN ADDITION THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE; SECTION 18.120.060 BONDING AND ASSURANCES AND SECTION 18.164 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS. COPIES MAY BE OBTAINED THROUGH THE PLANNING DIVISION OR THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE DATE OF THE FINAL DECISION. SECTION II. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Background: The subject site is presently developed with an older storage building and a mixture of trees and brush. 2. Vicinity Information: The site is located on SW Greenburg Road north of an Access Road #4 to the Washington Square Mall. The surrounding properties are zoned for General Commercial and Office Professional use and are developed with a mixture of large NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 93 -0025 - W & 11 PACIFIC Page 3 bA O scale general retail commercial use (Rubenstein's Furniture) parking areas within the Washington Square Mall and Professional Office uses. 3. Site Information and Proposal Description: The subject parcel is approximately 2.38 acres in size and is presently vacant with . the exception of an older storage building approximately 5,700 square feet in size. The site has direct frontage on SW Greenburg Road and. on Access Road #4 serving the Washington Square Mall. The applicant proposes to construct a 25,000 square foot building for general retail use. The architectural treatment proposed for the structure incorporates the use of masonry walls and columns with reveal and accent features. The more prominent elevations towards SW Greenburg Road feature metal awnings, plaster textured accents and reveal features. The site is currently comprised of all /or a portion of three parcels, the applicant has requested approval for Lot Line Adjustments to consolidate the existing parcels into two parcels. To complete the parcel consolidation the applicant must complete an additional Lot Line Adjustment to eliminate the property line between the two adjusted parcels (See Attachment #3). 4. Agency and CIT Comments: The General Telephone, Tualatin Valley Water District, the Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue, Washington County, the Oregon Department of Transportation, TRI- MET, the Tigard Police Department and the Building and Safety Department, have reviewed this proposal and have provided the following recommendations concerning this proposal. GTE stated that the developer is responsible to place all conduit and trench according to GTE specifications. The Tualatin Valley Water District stated that the applicant needs to submit three sets of p! ins for approval. The Water District noted that the asphalt in SW Greenburg Road is approximately 18 inches thick. A two inch service will be provided from the six inch fire line at the west side of SW Greenburg Road. The District indicated that the applicant should consider using existing water service for irrigation purposes if the size is adequate. The Fire District recommended increasing the proposed four inch Automatic Fire Sprinkler System with a six inch system. NOTICE OF DECISION &A 93 -0025 - `VV & H PACIFIC Page 4 • The Washington County Department of Transportation Planning reviewed this proposal due to its location on Greenburg Road which is the County's responsibility for ongoing maintenance and design issues. The County indicated that the proposed access location shown from Greenburg Road must be eliminated due to the site's location at the intersection of Greenburg Road and Access Road #4. The County standard for allowing access to Greenburg Road is that a minimum of 600 foot spacing must be maintained between access points. A. traffic analysis is currently being performed by the County Traffic Analyst for this area which is known as the "Hall /Greenburg /Scholls Study Area ". The findings and recommendations will be forwarded to the City upon completion. The County Transportation Planning Department provided the following Conditions of Approval for this development: 1. Dedicate additional right -of -way to provide 49 feet from centerline of Greenburg Road frontage. 2. Sign a waiver not to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district or other mechanism to improve the base facility of SW Greenburg Road frontage. 3. Establish a one -foot non - access reserve strip along SW Greenburg frontage. 4. Submit Plans, obtain Engineering Division approval, and obtain a faeility permit for construction of the following public improvements: a. Concrete sidewalk to County standard along SW Greenburg Road frontage. b. Any additional off -site safety improvements found to be required for compliance with R &O 86 -95 upon completion of County Traffic Analyst's review. Prior to Occupancy the road improvements required in conjunction with Conditions A.4 above shall be completed and accepted by the County. The Oregon Department of Transportation reviewed this proposal and requested that the Traffic Report for the site investigate more completely the relationship between the site and the intersection of SW Greenburg Road and SW Hall Boulevard. The agency also indicated that the Traffic Study should contain an analysis of vehicle trips traveling to the site in addition to the current analysis of the expected impact of vehicle trips leaving the site. NOTICE OF DECISION SDI. 93 -0025 W & H PACIFIC: Page 5 TRI -MET has reviewed this proposal and provided the following comments which reflect Tri -Met's participation in the State Transportation Planning Rule, Goal 12 implementation process: 1. Provide perimeter sidewalks along SW Greenburg Road and Access Road #4 with access points through any perimeter landscaping at appropriate intervals. These sidewalks should be straight as opposed to meandering to provide the most direct pedestrian circulation by the site. 2. Provide a three foot minimum landscaping buffer between sidewalks and auto traffic along SW Greenburg Road. This buffer enhances pedestrian circulation along the street. The Police Department reviewed this proposal and indicated concerns related to allowing full service vehicle access from this site directly onto SW Greenburg Road due to the traffic volume present on SW Greenburg Road. The Building Department indicated that existing utilities must be removed and capped at an approved location. The entire existing building (including the foundations) must be removed and any remaining excavation must be filled with compacted fill. The Public Works Department, Northwest Natural Gas, Portland General Electric and the Unified Sewer Agency were provided with copies of this application and have offered no comments or objections. SECTION III. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION A. COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION+: Use Classification: Chapter 18.062.030(L) states that the purpose of the General Commercial zoning district is to provide sites for the provision of major retail goods and services. The applicant states that the proposed building is to be used for General Retail use which is in compliance with the purposes of the General Commercial Zoning District. Minimum Lot Area: Chapter 18.62.050 states that there is no minimum lot area for parcels in the General Commercial Zone. Lettion 18,62.050 (A)(1) states that the average lot width shall be 50 feet. The site is the combination of all or part of three existing parcels which when combined have an average width of approximately 290 fc et which complies with this standard. As a part of this proposal the applicant has submitted two Lot Line Adjustments which create lots of 41,747 and 62,192 square feet in area (See Attachment #3), NCB ICE OF DECISION SDR 93 -0025 - W & H PACIFIC Page 6 Development proposals within this zoning district may not exceed 85% of the site with impervious structures (buildings and hard surfaces). The site plan indicates that 78,791 square feet {(76 %) of the property is proposed to be developed with impervious structures which complies with the requirement. The General Commercial Zoning District also requires a minimum of 15% of the site be landscaped. The site plan provides 24,881 square feet (24%) of the site with landscaping in compliance with the requirement. Setbacks: Chapter 18.0E 2.050 provides the setbacks standards for General Commercial sites. The Code permits development at the property line within the Development Cede for the front, side, or rear yards provided clear vision and landscape buffering requirements can be met. Because the subject property is surrounded on all sides by other properties which are also zoned and used for commercial or professional office uses, no special setbacks are required to buffer the proposed land uses from other adjoining sites. The proposed structure also complies with the Special Setbacks set forth in Section 18.096(B)(2)(a) which is 30 feet from the centerline of SW Greenburg Road. Building.Ileighht: Chapter 18.062.050(A)(4) states that no building .shall exceed a height of 45 feet. The most prominent features of me architectural elevations measure 36 feet in height. The majority of the building is 32 feet in height. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Chapter 18.106.030(C)(15) requires one parking space for each 400 square feet of gross floor area. The floor plan for the building provides a 25,000 square feet of gross floor area which requires 63 parking spaces currently 125 spaces are shown. Due to the number and general character of the existing trees along Access Road #4 to Washington Square, Condition of Approval #2 requires that an arborist report be prepared for the site. The report shall be prepared assuming the 19 parking spaces adjoining Access Road #4 are deleted and the trees in this area have been preserved. This may reduce the number of on-site parking spaces to a maximum of 106 spaces. The site would still exceed the 63 spaces required to serve this development. Driveway. Chapter 18.108,080, requires commercial development with 99 or less required parking spaces to provide a minimum of one access point with a width of 30 feet. The site plan complies with this requirement by providing a direct entrance to the site through Access Road #4 which abuts the site and Intersects with SW Greenburg Road. Due to existing and projected traffic volume on SW Greenburg Road, the Washington County Transportation Planning Department required the elimination of a planned entrance on SW Greenburg Road because Access Road #4 is available as the primary entrance to the site, County Planners NOTICE OP DECISION SIR 93-0025 - W & I t PACIFIC Page 7 may permit new points of access to SW Greenburg Road where existing access is not available within 600 feet. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Effective January 26, 1992 a minimum of one disabled person parking space for each twenty -five required parking spaces up to 100 hundred spaces. This site is required to provide a minimum of three disabled person parking spaces because a minimum of 63 parking spaces would be required to serve this building. The site plan currently shows two handicapped person parking spaces therefore the site plan must be modified to provide a minimum of one more disabled person parking space. Bicycle Parking: Chapter 18.106.020(P) requires one bicycle parking rack for each 15 vehicle parking spaces in any development. Due to the size of the floor plan proposed for this site a minimum of five bicycle parking racks are required to serve this development. Condition of Approval #1 requires that a minimum of five bicyc'e racks be provided. VV`alkwav: Chapter 18.108.050(A) requires that a walkway extend from the main ground floor entrance of all commercial developments to the streets which provide the required ingress arc] egress. TRI -MET requested that the applicant provide separated sidewalks for enhancement of pedestrian use. The Engineering Department indicates that additional right -of -way is not available in this area to construct separated sidewalk along the street frontage. Condition of Approval #8 requires that applicant construct all street improvements to Washington County standards, Condition of Approval #4 requires that the site plan be revised to include pedestrian walkways from SW Greenburg Road and Access Road #4 onto the site. Street Trees: Chapter 18.100,030 states that all development projects fronting on . a public street more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with the standards in Section 18.100.035. This site has frontage on SW Greenburg Road in excess of 100 feet. The landscape plan for this site provides Norway Maple Street Trees planted at 35 feet on center. At maturity the Norway Maple measures 55 to 60 feet in height and is considered a large specimen within the Development Code. The Norway Maple trees as shown on the Landscape Plan comply with the standards for street trees. Visual Clearance Areas: Chapter 18.102 requires that a clear vision area for motorist and pedestrian safety be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or private driveways. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall, structure, temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height, measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center line grade. Trees exceeding this height may be located its the clear vision area, provided all NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 93 -0025 - W & H. PACIFIC Page 8 branches below eight feet are removed. Condition, of Approval #5 requires that the applicant modify the size of the trees to be provided within the "line-of-site visibility triangle" approaches such that the branches or limbs of the trees within these areas are above eight feet in height. Trash Recycling_and Loading_Facilities: Chapter 18.120.120 (A)(4)(c) states that service and loading areas shall be indicated on the site plan. The applicant has provided a loading space which measures 55 feet in length. The space also provides maneuvering areas both within the designated space and within the adjoining two -way parking lot aisle in excess of three times the length of the loading space. Chapter 18.106.090 requires a minimum of two times the length of the largest vehicle sex vicing the facility be provided. The applicant has provided two trash and recycling areas on either side of the loading space. Both receptacle areas exceed the dimensional requirements of METRO as stated in. the Model Zoning Ordinance for Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage. The site also provides landscaping to screen these areas from view. Tree Removal; Chapter 18.150 contains standards for obtaining a required permit for removal of trees on site which have a trunk six inches or more in diameter measured four feet above the ground, The Lot Line Adjustment applications submitted along with the Site Development Review application indicate that existing trees are proposed to be removed to allow construction of site improvements as currently proposed. Because the site plan provides twice the number of required parking spaces required for general retail use. Condition of Approval #2 requires that the applicant preserve a portion of the group of trees in place which adjoin Access Road #4 where feasible by deleting 19 proposed parking spaces along the southern property line. The applicant may modify this requirement by causing a report to be issued by an arborist which reviews the general condition and viability of preserving the trees in place. Prior to removal of any tree on site in excess of six inches in diameter as measured four feet above existing ground level, Condition of approval #3, requires the applicant to obtain a tree removal permit as set forth in Chapter :18.150 of the D - relopment Code. Landscapin ,Plarr: Section 18.100.015(C) requires that the applicant submit a detailed landscape plan as a part of Site Development Review. The landscape plan provided with this application provides parking lot trees in excess of the required number for the parking lot area. The Development Code requires one tree for every seven parking spaces the applicant has provided one tree for approximately every 4 parking spaces. The plan also provided a variety of shrubs, and ground cover in satisfaction of the landscaping requirements for this site. NOTICE OF DECISION SbR 93 -0025 - w & 14 PACIFIC Page 9 Signs: Section 18.114.130(C) lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the General Commercial zone. All signs for this site shall be reviewed by the Planning Division through the Sign Permit process. SECTION IV. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: XX The applicant and owners XX Owners of record within the required distance XX The affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator XX Affected government agencies 2. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON , 41 y UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 3. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 1832.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. Appeal fee schedule and forms are available at Tigard City Hall, 15 125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3 :30 p.m. 7-- 1`6 -lit 4. Questions: If you have questions, please contact the Planning Division at 639 -4171, City of Tigard, City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon. PREPARED BY: Mark Roberts Assistant Planner isrAr APPROVED BY: Richard g. • t' rsdorff Senior Planner NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 93 -0025 - W & H PACIFIC eiLl DATE 2- DATE Page 10 VICINITY EXHIBIT MAP GREE'NEURG ROAD R . 10' (rrn) C.) RETAIL CENTER 25,000 S.F. Of M .w.ori M w ww.wi..io.....wrw.l. M N mow. N 4.wigwam, M M .owlrnl M M YrW ^+w aY W aewwwMm+wo M M MwN+ M N 4.4aaara M M EXISTING PARKING LOT", r--- PLOT PLAN IEXHIIIT MAP A". TACki,ENT #2 72.60' iii° 72.60' `di 11 IK VIP 011 rN I°1144 cif T.L. ! rROrrn -� uNr ro A or Ammo l soibi'00.W"*"- !MAIM LOC rou LAC 128.97' 18.32 or4 Iroe 01. "ADM A e 57'5J'49" Aw45,99' L e 46,44' r 14 i 1141 14.4' 500 d 2" �d�hi4' `A iAiro oc 1::11 "� �wusrm I °� �4Ai 1 vii qi4 145.10' »j71,J1' 5`32,611' fROPOECO PROPCRtY UN LOCA1)GN f,L 402 NNKING MCA 1.L, 401 rMk7HO MCA A '. 90'00' Aw.30.00' I. a 47,12' W r.�.wr M TAX GOt AR AS IAA U., i+li. .1 tylatligAtti Jon 0eM AC 099481 Si A 401 ,d r 211,202 le 41.193 sr 81.10 xV 0.058 At 1,477 AC • PLOT PLAN EXHIBIT MAP i�+iy.l,wwr.�lll.»M/r4 i (.9 u 0 r 0 CASE NO. S .' ' 1,+NT #3 i 1S126C0 -00100 MENASHE, R BARRY 6426 SW BVTN-- HILLSDALE HWY PORTLAND OR 97221 1S126C0 -00300 WASHINGTON SQUARE INC PO BOX 21545 SEATTLE WA 90111 15126C0 -00402 WASHINGTON SQURE INC PO BOX 21545 SEATTLE WA/ 98111 1S126C0- 01107 WASHINGTON SQU1 INC PO BOX 21545 SEATTLE WA, 98111 15126C0.01900 CRESCENT GROVE CRESCENT GROSS CEMETERY 00000 TERY ASS 1512680 -02400 BEIM & JAMES PROPERTIES IX 4700 BOHANNON DR #101 MENLO PARK CA 94025 1S126DC- 00901 GETFISEMANE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH 9640 SW GRE:EN$URG RD PORTLAND OR 97223 15126D8- 02800 FRANKLIN COMMONS ASSOCIATES 500 NE MULTNOMAH #950 PORTLAND OR 97232 1512600. 01111 DAVID & LINDA HUDESMAN CO TRS BY LAMONTS APPAREL INC ATTN: FINANCIAL REPORTING 3650 131ST AVE SE BELLE'VUE' WA 98006 WASHINGTON SQUARE INC PO BOX 23623 TIGARD OR 97223 1S126C0.00200 NELSON, MARY E % CANYON FURNITURE INC 11295 SW 135TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 1S126C0 -00401 FRINGE LAND ORE LTD PO BOX 21545 SEATTLE WA 98111 1S126C0 -00500 WASHINGTON SQUARE INC PO BOX 21545 SEATTLE , /98111 1S126C0-01109 WASHINGTON SQUARE INC BY JC PENNEY CO PO BOX 10001 DALLAS TX 75301 13126B0• -02200 BEIM & JAMES P OPERTIHS II 4700 B0BANN. DR #101 MENLO P • CA 94025 1S126DC -00900 ROE, EMILY LOUISE 13775 SW 6TH BEAVERTON OR 97005 1S126DC -00902 • rr•, CARPENTER, WE S COTT 0 2023 NE 42ND AVE PORTLAND OR 97213 15126D8 029W LEGACY HEALTH SYSTEM ATTN: LARRY HILL S00 NE MULTNOMAH ST PORTLAND OR 97232 W & U PACIFIC INC PO BOX 80040 PORTLAND OR 97280 JOEL STEVENS 9660 SW VENTURA CT TIGARD OR 97223 15126DB- -02800 FRANKLIN COMMONS ASSOCIATES 500 NE MULTNOMAH #950 PORTLAND OR 97232 1612600 -00100 MULLARD, PHILLIP G CRISPE, GERALD A ET AL BY LABELGRAPHICS 6700 SW BRADBURY COURT PORTLAND OR 97224 1512600 -- 00401. Ti S BANK REAL ESTATE MGMT DIV T -3 PO BOX 8837 PORTLAND OR 97208 1612600 -- 01107 SQUARE LAND CO BY W I N NAR PACIFIC I N C PO BOX 21545 SEATTLE WA 98111 16126C0.1401 1S1260C -00200 NELSON, MARY E % CANYON FURNITURE INC 9285 SW GREENBURO ROAD TIGARD OR 97223 98111 WASHINGTON SQUARE INC PO BOX 21545 SEATTLE WA 98111 JOEL STEVENS 9660 SW IURA CT TIGARD +R 97225 ; • To: _ Company: Phone: _ / -0/kGr.,.; ___ Fax: GIL. - cct-15 From: 92p,,e44„ Company: ____ City of Tigard Phone: _____ (503) 639-4171 _____ Fax: (503) 639-6795 Date: - 2- ckLe Pages including this page: _ _ _____ City cf Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 111 MEI . \,t. Is 1 0 1 9 100 ______..... ,-- __ .■sooww..ww■■• ....wow**. ••■•■■■■.,...■r.MP ,Yoro.wor w^..w. , wc•■•■m•..rwo.kwar.■ *......•■••myrrot, .maas... City cf Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 111 MEI e503 684 7297 CITY OF TIGAR * ** ACTIVITY MANAGEMENT REPORT TX * ** ACTY# MODE CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID START TIME USAGE T. PAGES RESULT *9028 TX G3 503 620 2086 NICOLI ENG.,Inc. 09/12 08:04 01'05 2 OK *9032 TX G3 5032480194 OK 09/12 08 :43 02'24 5 OK *9037 TX G3 503 +274 +2616 01'46 09/12 09:34 01'08 2 OK *9038 TX G3 206 822 9666 09/12 09/12 09 :43 01'39 3 OK *9043 TX G3 503 245 1170 503 526 0775 09/12 09:55 00'44 .1. OK *9044 TX G3 5036201916 AUTO RX 09/12 09 :57 00'36 1 OK *9048 TX G3 503 797 1793 OK 09/12 10:07 00'59 1 OK *9052 TX G3 503 797 1799 01'15 09/12 10 :16 02'12 4 OK *9056 TX G3 503 777 2399 09/12 09/12 10 :38 01'01 2 OK *9063 TX 03 818 932 6153 09/12 11 :43 01'02 2 OK 9069 TX G3 503 526 0775 AUTO RX 09/12 13:08 00'33 1 OK 9072 TX 0847297 OK 09/12 13 :42 00'00 QI NG 09/12 09 :53 00'49 2 OK *9045 0 ►S.'. z p 9073 TX G3 503 225 0224 09/12 09/12 13 :44 00'43 2 OK 9075 TX 03 503 225 0224 503 526 0775 09/12 13 :52 01'52 5 NG 2 OK *9051 AUTO RX G3 503 526 0775 1 # #104 9079 TX G3 1 503 639 1471 OK 09/12 14:09 01'27 2 OK 9080 TX G3 503 526 0775 01'06 09/12 14 :17 00'33 1 OK *i.* ACTIVITY MANAGEMENT REPORT AX *** o********** ** **'**** *** *** * ****** * *** ***** * ACTY# MODE CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID START TIME USAGE T. PAGES RESULT *9024 AUTO RX G3 09/11 18:51 01'00 I. OK *9025 AUTO RX G3 09/11 18 :58 01'46 2 OK *9030 AUTO RX 03 503 +274 +2616 09/12 08 :16 00'34 1 OK *9031 AUTO RX 03 503 526 0775 09/12 08:26 00'40 1 OK *9034 AUTO RX 03 503 273 4822 09/12 09 :05 01'06 2 OK *9035 AUT;? RX G3 09/12 09 :26 01'15 2 OK *9039 AUTO RX G3 09/12 09 :36 00'57 2 NG 2 # #201 *9040 AUTO RX 03 09/12 09 :38 04'57 9 OK *9042 AUTO RX G3 5037718790 09/12 09 :53 00'49 2 OK *9045 AUTO RX 03 09/12 10 :00 01'55 3 OK *9050 AUTO RX G3 503 526 0775 O /J2 10 :10 O1'33 2 OK *9051 AUTO RX G3 503 526 0775 09/12 10 :12 01'11 2 OK *9054 AUTO RX G3 503 243 2775 D.M. DRAKE CO. 09/12 10 :21 01'06 2 OR *90r 3 RX 03 206 670 2533 NARDONE MECH 09/12 11 :21 00'42 1 OK *90a. , .PTO RX G3 09/12 11 :27 01'09 1 OK *9061 AUTO RX G3 503618.1426 09/12 11 :31 05'21 8 OK *9062 AUTO RX G3 00/12 11 :38 02'11 4 OK *9064 AUTO RX G3 503 093 9796 09/12 11:41 00'33 1 OK 9066 AUTO RX 03 5032739278 09/12 11 :46 01'00 2 OK 9067 AUTO RX G3 09/12 11 :58 00'50 2 OK 9068 AUTO RX G3 09/12 12 :00 00'49 2 OK 9070 AUTO RX G3 09/12 13 :31 01'03 2 OK 9077 AUTO RX G3 503 684 2206 09/12 13 :58 01'25 3 OK 9078 AUTO RX 03 503 684 2296 09/12 14 :00 01'20 3 OK 8405 S.W. Nimbus Avenue Beaverton, OR 970024120 PLEASE Noun( us IMMEDIATELY AT (SW) 626.0455 IF MU ARE An PROBLEMS RECEI'VING TUTS TRANSMISSION - Copied To: 10 Copies - Description II v /TN 1.0.1 A 6 .......*............. A , t., P•...........*........ ....................%.....„......,.............,...........................................................................,........., .... ...„..........,..........,464 7.* . 6 ........1 0 0 ................................•/•/.1.•••■ I ........ ,.............* ., *,.. .4.4 1.... I *OM .1 14 1.411............... . or.. . .r.o...*.... rws*■••••••....- - .......*.aftWv10*.....*...r.....*.................g..10. ■••• _ ■ If,. ... • .N. 1 .. 'ti' ■ el I * -_ �, .,. • X., f Ir ,'I 4 L , 1,, ..,, ,i tmr 1 • . : +�• �',�%' , . r \I li ' j tit 1 „- '" °240 ..I • ' •� /,r' , ,�> r, Yw...�.. 0•14 ..a. • W I ,pYte. . Wd a..." I4.w.14 11.1 ..l 11 kw......• • . .0 ..iu +••1 ♦.li•i aw .a.4 V•w. MI• .. Y.Mr.• 0000 .- - -/. N1 ma We, .5 .ranoa In ... . ....,...+r.+. 144.+,.. ..A. w. .uruw...:, • 19 Y+1 ACCESS ROAD NO. 4 PACIFIC 8405 S.W, Nimbus Avenue Beaverton, OR 97008 -7120 July 31, 1996 Mr. Jr m Funk City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: WASHINGTON SQUARE PARKING LOT S.T.T. #96 -0034 PC# 6 -90c W&HP FILE NO. 4-1276-6002 Dear Jim: In response to your letter dated July 12, 1996 I offer the following: Item #1. Provide an erosion control plan in accordance with Unified. Sewerage Agency requirements. RESPONSE: An erosion control plan that meets the requirements of Unified Sewerage Agency has been prepared as Sheet EC -1 and is attached for your review. Item #2. A Demolition Permit is required. RESPONSE: A demolition permit was obtained on June 12, 1996, and is attached as Exhibit "A" for your review. The demolition has been performed and a copy of the demolition invoice from Northwest Demolition is attached as Exhibit "B" for your review. Item #3, Parking facilities which are used in conjunction with adjacent building parking needs shall have accessible parking facilities; constructed, striped, signed and maintained as required by ORS 447.233. A, Provide seven (7) accessible parking facilities with access aisles and signage, Submit details and a new parking Jot plan. 1. Accessible parking stalls for the disabled shall have signs and pavement markings of the international symbol of accessibility clearly visible and designed to standards adopted by the Oregon Department of Transportation (Section 3104(d) 9). RESPONSE: We have revised our project site plan to provide seven accessible parking spaces, The current plans provide the appropriate number of spaces, signage and striping (see Sheets _Cµ1 and C- 3). B. At least one accessible route shall be provided within the boundary of the site, from public transportation, public streets or sidewalks, to all buildings and accessible site facilities (OSSC, Section 1103,1), The new parking lot plan shall define the route, curb ramps, crossing, and signage. Mr. Jim, Funk July 30, 1996 Page 2 RESPONSE: An accessible route has been provided within the project boundary from the public sidewalks to all accessible facilitict, See Sheets C -1 and C -3 for curb ramps, crossing and signage. Item #4. Provide the total of all construction costs for permit fee calculation. RESPONSE: A. construction cost estimate has been attached as Exhibit "C" for your review and use in preparing permit for calculation. Our project approvals expire on August 18, 1996, so we are most anxious to obtain our permit so that we may begin construction. Your prompt attention to this matter is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Pacif • 'otmy, A, ,L.A. Project Manager JABE /kal Attachments: 1. One set of proposed construction documents, 2, Exhibit A - Demolition. Permit 3. Exhibit B - Invoice for Demolition 4. Exhibit C - Construction Cost Estimate cc: Mark Roberts, City of Tig ,ird, Planning Department 1. . OF liwnRD FE.C:i'IPT OF PPr lyIENf REL.:Elh►'!. NO. ..:96^- ''26'Zt496 CHECK AMOUNT n 69.1.5 qrM,Lw I M N'I"I'•IWt' S I t'!i•..Mut.« 1'1' 1 :'01 \1 CASH SH AMO1.1NT 0.00 ,1=sE::i;: la J:: MAl'd"d"d,.. J NCa t«'(aYMCwN'i" DAM': 06/12/.96 PO 00X 930 aUBU1,V4S.C:C:1N . . W 1,1..SON V I LLE O I 1JkPW.fl , !.1!-" Pi•1Y 1ijL;f 1 T 11x11 qJI•4 t t4.110 pC.iRPO PN Ml. N fi• AMOUNT PAID 1'd'. Mil :i:C)- i.0i,i t,�C.li�1 d`s 7s. 1 �t.,l;s'�1l i 1= x�:►;� F;t;+4°;.(01‘; CON 'C'��,C h. . I... M..,.,,. 1.. wM+ M. r, w� ..d.w+�..l.h.�.....r..wN+....0 4...Y .MM,nMr. W...syM..w►.1fw�w.i ...... .w... �C,.14 L 1 i l .1.1 PE 1,.� 1« kw:'r lwl'1tJ I of (,t.ilvl rt.i: 'JL.. PLAN C1 ti a.40 .� ti �u.�.i'i J. i:rl:a ►ii�l "� 'l` 1. i.'ildl d ° »'lw:Fti�'t 1: "I' w 1,40 inN:9ok i" 69.15 • ,` `.` ~� • ° • • 4 ,� x ]� �LJ4� �� _l�� - �- YOF1l0ARD BUILDING |m�PECTONNO\'~� |nmpooUonUno:GOQ417S Business Phone: 88S�171 Footing Rain Drain Cover/Service Foundation Water Line Ceiling PooVBesmMooh. Shear/Sheath Framing P|bg.Und/F|r/8|ob PIbg. Top Out Insulation PnoV8eam8\md. Mooh, Rough-in Gyp. Bd. 8a.n Sewer `. ' , 800Uno App�8dw|k ` ,i:,..,::9 Gas 7 /. Other: ' �� ('�^9 ' .7[�, ) —~ -___- FINAL: -Plumb, ''Mech. -Elect. -Bldg. Reins, Dote: / / ' , ' " /, -_ . A.M. Entry: Address: ~L: f ' . ' ' ' / /' ' j /_ `.-c: r.., L Tenant: / Q�: .1 ' ~~' ' Con/Own: ^) / ''• ---- PLM: THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED: E[R. -- --' , _~�/� /'��(v�// ,/" '/r~ _ ._ ~r ' -7- ' ---- ____ ' i '7 ~ - ' . ^�/7 L+��' /xr`_ ' ��_ -'------- -------- -3�� - - ` ' _~ _ _______ �_~_____. -. _ { ~_' ____■- kmpeo�n ��,, /��o_�� Do _ _ __ y` '..„,'_:APPROVED ~_.D|8APPROVEO/OALLFOR RBNGR Cr CO • oeS • ` ` \ '• . ' • • • ; • 1 •■■•••••••••■•.. . . . ' AU ILD ING -PERMIT: !:';‘,...• -'...i., „ , . . „ #Sr * • t, ...:t 0 i . '1 ZUP3 ta'•: : I • % " :„'.''' .: : % ' : , • :. : '11 '\. '11'. 0 it : ISSUED: .(ZIE,/ I, alc.)0..i').74. ,,, .' , . . - ...,-.:,- . -., - •'-,., ,;., or, , . ' .• L • ,, , , v. 1.....1‘.6.; . r r .. ' • • . : •:.‘ '' • '1) "; ' ' ....--4..'''4 C•`,' . ','.1 ' 7. PARCEL : 5 1 2eiC4,-'17JV 11,414.tiT • SITE ADDR8SS,..m:'09385 SW GR'4,..NBURG RD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. 13126 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 9722308190 X03) 639-4171 '. . ' . • , .. • ::,-., "`f •• r .: ."''':):''. '; .4 4' ?4."0":'•'');, ,- ,./.. 4, .•,., ,, ...Z ON I tAG x !4:.-(:);:,..*'-' ::,. • • . .. ._. 4 .4..i.,...;1...:t.it,.:,.1,,4V..1 .i,/,.: ,...;;;;; 4:,,:,:, V.;;;;:,f .1*:,....,).! BLIOCi.C. • • ',. • • • ,, s' • 'o: L.01.• ,, .. lo . O. 0 O . 111,' O...11 Pi ',:o 11' 01 ' r,s- , •,...".., ,,. •••:.;,,,,.. r ' ''. 1 ' 4.,.• '', :;,e. 7 ' 4. 5..:, ' .. T.,:i . 1 ' 0, ; .r,. I, L. • . 4 ,..,h' :: '.., i014#' ( C.T ■ 0. ol• I, ' A t •• ' •••• .4. 0........• ....., ...,* ..,,,, .............•,,, worm... ....-• N..... .....1 ........... •,..• v.. ..... oo, ......... loo 000 ...7 oo. o••• oo:,••••• ,.... oot ....4 0.1•••.,.........,,,,...,......... ...,4 o.a..,.............................9..........01.4.4olj...........;.....4 Apo. *or wo 00000•oo, 1....r.••■•••,......!.°1,.........00,o••• .ol'oo. o■Voo, A .....,"',. , i • ,,, ..';: . •,4 • ' - .4. ,.. t ,, ■••• ' ' r ;4•,1 , , '.. 4;,,•,,,r , • • "", .' ro : - •.,"...., V . :, ,1:, . 0 0. ,,,•,, ,, REISSUE CLSS or: wow, :DEN TYPI:7; DE USE,, C011 CONIST. 4$N OCCUPANC r, OCCUPANCY LOAD: 0 STC. 12:1 HT ; 0 ft BSIvrr lz`LOOR LOAD. , A 0 ri psf DWEL.L., 'NO UNITS:, 0 BED RIAS : 0 13ATH3 % Remarks 1, Demol it ion FLOOR 'EA TER I OR'.;!.*WAL..1-:.::,CONSTRUCT101‘177....*: , F RST” • 0'. f N ; ▪ • , • 0 ' s f . •, PRoTrEcT.. TOTAL EIASEMENTi, .4, 0 st, f " N • • „S E :7; 14: sf ROOF tONST FIRE.: RET? .* sf .SEP; I RATED: REem LtET 0 L ft RGHT 0 ft FRNT 0 'Ft REAR tZt ft, OCCU RATED • r." REclu.x • SID1,-(1.-:t; • SMON FIR ALRIvii • * O I hiP UFWC 0 . • PRO CORR PARK I i‘IG t f 4,...5/115C.10 Ft, h — 4ub p ic pum▪ dtfi1ed :or ,1 eet4or a pr:P.'..?t1 rd int3pected '''•'•■••■•••••••••••*.,..... own ee NIYI A R COMPANY INC type 700 nvE; (lief P R NT s SPCT it T; TTLI.:: (4r) ERoL; ph E P, P 11 E. RPC ctmtpact or %. ...a, too oha oao oryo, •Fia Ooo oul,ra to. a too for 4.1 oy• 04.1 Ooo NORTHW&S3T DENOLITION/DISMANTLI BRIAN H SMITH PO SOX 290 WILSOW.W.E. ON 97070 Ph on e % 63 a-6W0 Rem :g. m 4 46863 This perait iz imed subject to the regulations contained in tho Tigard Nanicipal Code, State of Ores Specialty Codes aid all other applicable laws. All work will be done in accordance with ' approved plans. This perKit will expire ifvrk is not started within 140 days of issuancel or if work is suspended for u4re than 140 days. wo to 1 t n ; Ltr% 1 . • " • , • • - • • r ,••••6 F5Es low o.1 mo0 woo aod4 oego *.o* O. , amas.int•' , clat'e • "-...i-e*6'pt", -CiLi • 00 r 0 / / 5) 6 r I, 2 Ei 0.6 /12/96 .96-7280496 • 00 ,Ii?; 06112/56 .96-fff5:804.96 ' 0E1%112/96 q6304% * " 06/1154/96 96-72804% • o f ....1 ",* • r t . .. . . ' • , fo,.........., aolO Owl Mao •••1 no.... v.. /kW oo• row ,o,to lool tog, ..e• Oni Amo. 4. O., O.*. O.. *a a., OO. Io, %Oh ...4.4.1 444 044 ... „. ' • , ... r ' ' .1.• . ' $ • 'GC) ,, 1 TCITAL ',. • ,..' „ . -..... . • EOU NED I Ni4PC,:r ONS • • Put rop/Fill (ipt, i * • P ti liner r • tOop.Mgoat000.O. OitororoOli • ", „ ,.. .41 • " , .‘° " • .? '" ,04•4441•01.404•44;4444444,4.44.4.4.40.**W.4.444:,44,44 c.11 rDt nope 01; on - I ' - • • Oaa,...to.O.Oboo ........;:o.omoahOlrOoboOlOao:sorvio.Oooiaooloroo•O0000•ool • '• ' 4•' • - • ▪ f ' ",••• •• " , . . • o :^ ' :"i ' - - • „ • • , ° ° " r • • ,r0 4, • „ •4' . • • • . • 4.4.4....•••••••• • O*444........•••*•••■••*•••••••••••■••••••ao• .,,.. • • r P.O. Box WO Ouvoo wor() ro, 503/v1.6900 FaX 1,031038 101$) Winmar Company, Inc, 700 Fifth Avenue, 2600 Key Tower P.O. Box 21545 Seattle, Washington 98111-3545 EXHF3IT 'EV /0/tr-- DEMOLITION & DISMANTLING June 26, 1996 Attention: James S. Linton, Vice President Director of Construction Re: Washington Square Shed Demolition Dear Mr. Linton: Please find attached our invoice #06256 covering the demolition and clean-up of the Washington Square Maintenance Shed. As you will notice, the clean-up for debris intide, as well as outside, was extensive. Roger ott's crew removed only those items that were of value to the Washington Square Maintenance Department and left all remaining material. Not only was there a considerable amount of material inside the shed but there was also years' of accumulation of mazeria l. outside the building inside the fenced yard area which we were asked to load and remove from the site We also encountered a small amount of asbestos floor tile in the office area which had to be removed. We had this dome by Lake Oswego Insulation. Please see the attached invoice. rim, at the time we quoted this job we did not anticipate this magnitude or volume of additional work nor die. we sat a dollar figure for it, other than that we would use our schedule of charges for determining the cost. Once we received your contract, which was approximately whet we finished the work, we saw where your office had stated aJditional work at approwimately $3,000.00. If, after reviewing our invoice, the cost of this job presents a problem, I would appreciate a c,..11 from you and we will resolve it in any manner that you feel is acceptable. As always, we are most appreciative of the opportunity to work for you and Winmar Company, Inc, BHS/ms • • • Sincerely., Brian H. Smith ?resident Qf,t,q,,,orip. arid Excavation A \ A(1 7•. • a • • . . • • .•• • Box 930 Oropo» .9i0 70 Tot 50:1/6386.Q00 Fax 50,11/(08 WO) Winmar Company, Inc. 700 Fifth Avenue, 2600 Key Tower P.O, Box 21545 Seattle, Washington 98111-3545 Washington Square Shed Demolition INVOICE #06256 DEMOLITION & DISMANTLING Lump Sum Quotation Change Order #12-96 6/14/96 Laborers - 2 men - 6 hours ea. @ $35.00/hour Bobcat - 6 hours @ $75.00/hour Pick-up - Daily Rate 04 Truck - 4 hours @ $85,00/hour 6/15/96 Laborers - 2 men - 5 hours ea 8 $35.00/hour Bobcat - 5 hours 0 $75.00/hur Pick-up - Daily Rate C5 Truck - 3 hours 0 $85,00/hour Disposal - Box of wood Disposal * Box of trash - $253.65 x 1.18 Change Order 413-96 6/18/96 Laborers - 3 men - 2 1/2 hrs. ea. @ $35,00/hr Bobcat - 2 1/2 hours 0 $75.00/hour C4 Truck - 2 1/2 hours @ $85.00/hour 6/19/96 Laborer - 4 1/2 hours 0 $35.00/hour Laborers - 2 men - 8 hrs. ea. @ $35.00/hour Bobcat * 8 hours 0 $75.00/hour C4 Truck - 8 hours @ $05.00/hour Disposal - Box of wood Komatsu 400 - 3 hours @ $226.00/hour Tire Removal - $117.00 x 1.18 Change Order #14-96 6/20/96 Laborers - 3 men - 4 hours ea. 0 $35.00/hour Komatsu 400 - 2 hours 0 $225.00/hour Bobcat - 4 hours 0 $75.00/hour Disposal - Box of wood Disposal - Debris/beVoe Landscape $175.00 x 1.18 Disposal - 1/2 box of trash - 1/2 x $371.48 x 1.16 Asbestos Testing - $22.50 x 1.18 Asbestos Removal - $829,470 x 1418 Net Due Net due 30 days. 1$ per month chatged on past due accounts. Equivalent to 12 annually. • June 25, 1996 $ 22,780,00 $ 420.00 $ 450.00 $ 50.00 $ 340.00 $ 1,260.00 $ 350.00 $ 375.00 $ 50.00 $ 255,00 0.00 $ 299.31 $ 1,329.31 $ 262,50 $ 187,50 $ 212.50 $ 662.50 $ 157,50 $ 560.00 $ 600.00 $ 680.00 0.00 $ 675.00 $ 138.06 $ 2,810.56 $ 420,00 $ 450.00 $ 300.00 0.00 $ 206.50 $ $ 1,595,67 26.55 $ 979.05 " i r • s••■ 1,1 $ 31,443.64 „o• DEMOU ON DISMANTLING N,O, Box 930, Wilsonville, OR 97070 (503) 636.6900 FAX (503) 638-1019 To E . �. . (........ , .1.- . . :1)1-k" AOt! 2-6 oo PHONE . DAT JOB NUMBER I JOB PHONE EXISTING CONTRACT NO DATE OF EXISTING CONTRACT We hereby agree to make the change(s) specified below ..(,)/g) G kelo rz. II s L,-.J )) p 'A._ s io//q194 LoA,,, t... .. YM4, it. CL .0z.. I, - ) gotic.,..4 E k , > 1) (1,-,440,,, ---i7:„, , l< e - 4/ ,,'‘,.i..s /,) _601( 4. -1. to ...„:k ) 66 < , --7,,,.....H. 6 iii,00k,,-,./....5-Z., 341 s, ".4,0, Ral-Ytcrt,t ew..t 64/ 7 r, ►-e r 1 L a i./ r , �r,: NOTE. This Change Order becomes part of and In conformance with the existing contract. WE AGREE hereby to make the change(s) specified above at this price t GATE— - PREVIOUS CONTRACT AMOUNT AUTHORIZED SICANA VUM. ;C:ONTSACTOH) ACC8PTEb — The above prices and specifications of this Change Order are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. AR work to be performed under same terms and conditions as specified in original contract unless otherwise stipulated, Date of acceptance , • . • , ' ' • ?r, • .." • P111W411 DEMOLITION DISMANTLING P.O. Box 930, Wilsonville, OR 97070 (503) 638-6900 FAX (503) 638-1019 TO /.3 ,• • •• Q•<) / • •„ We hereby agree to make the change(s) specified below: „ racy, 6 I\ ,.$ , inov, :z; co ms, t) _v. 3 kt. 1 ,Z6 his Change Order becomes part of an //(t. 0,V 0••• •••-■••• •••-, I ' ' • (PHONE JOB NAME/LO TION A ity 41 • It Nal '044 •71 rr0 Numberd 2 • 6- /V 94 JOB NUM0ER J00 PHONE EXISTING CONTRACT NO. DATE O EXISTING CONTRACT r( its w WE AGREE' hereby to make the change(s) specified above at this price OATS AUTr.ORIZED SION71,1041., if:OKITRACTON h the existing contrat. 11 s PREVIOUS CONTRACT AMOUNT F--- REVISED CONTRACT TOTAL $ ACCEPTED — The above prices and specifications of this Change Order are satisfactory and are hereby Date'of acceptance accepted. All work to be performed under same terms and conditions as specified In original contract unless Signature otherwise stipulated. ••••••••■•■*••:,••••••■• ' • , • .• OEMOUI7ON & O($MANi'UNG ' ( 6 P.O, Box 930, Wilsonville, OF? 97070 Number / THONE DAT (503) 638 -6900 FAX (503) 638 -1019 JOB NUMBER JOB PHONE EXISTING CONTRACT NO. DATE OF EXISTING CONTRACT We hereby agree to make the change(s) specified below: / 'Ogg (.4)6.e)C.,/, r / f,'k e DLrr 9'e NOTE: This Change Order becomes part of and in conformance with the existing contract. WE AGREE hereby to make the change(s) specified above at this price i ( a AUTHORIZED E W ATl1RE "• (C:ON1 r1ACITO ) REVISED CONTRACT TOTAL ACCEPTED The above Prir,T3 and specifications of Date of acceptance Change Order are satkifactory and are hereby C accepted, All work to be performed under same terms and conditions as specified in original contract unless Signature �C4 otherwise stipulated, (OWUEF4) ' 4 CROSSINGS ID :1507'363888 JUL 31'96 8:30 No .001 P.02 EXHIBIT 'C' C O M P A N Y , I N rC . July 31,1996 W & H Pacifxc,Inc, Attn, Jimmy Bellozny 5405 SW Nimbus Ave, Beaverton, Ore, 97008 RE: Washington Square Parking Lot Dear Jimmy, Below are the costs associated with developing the parking lot per W & 11 plans, These costs are based on bids received to do the work. Survey (allowance) $ 6,500 Excavation and grading 144,332 Storm Sewer 18,821 Concrete curbs and sidewalks 30 ,881 Paving 2" thick 42,320 Striping 1,800 Electrical 18,267 Landscape 32,666 Water Meter 12,450 Testing 1,000 0. MrYL. Total Construction Costs $ 309,032 understand this will be used to establish the basis for the permit fees, Please get in touch with me if you have any questions. Sincerely, John Kuhl cc; Jim Linton ar1fsmariwhO731 A h1AI i fti1 r;,OMI'ANw ez.: S 6%) IQ 93-cc2.5 :,�. 6.0t4.54.0/- 0.+4*- Z0,, 1 , 01,1,z, ,,.,,; o €5 6 CUt tic kPalued `i'elktrove 4 1 '', 5 etold tte,554 tc�. V1e5 +a ,eat Cf L� eateidood 5ittocv-actige4 c• a�.�� 'i w 1 a !,,,.,d "0`77 '6 ;'''I b i, &11-weru de. -tit4e 54)4e. 4a4 o. Al A-6 ok 1 yog ti a 1P.,t,c`'/ doPie vead yLu 4QJ/J od d vo `i% v42 5t P.-- +'Lq Co t.JW /osc.� d va �� 44' Ils-41V e lb 1114Z cc 1-ke PlatotIvci im 4 frtk :::" (AphiN11014 iPACIFIC 8405 S.W. Minibus Avenue Beaverton, OR 97008-7120 June 6, 1996 Mr. Mark Roberts City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: SDR 93 -0025 MIS 94 -0002 MIS 94 -0003 REQUEST FOR GRADING AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT Dear Mark: Enclosed is a copy of a grading and site development permit application that we have submitted to the building department and Engineering. I have copied you on this so that you can coordinate the planning approval more effectively. Additionally 1 have gone through the conditions of approval and responded to those as they relate to the parking lot expansion. Also enclosed is my letter to you last year requesting a one year extension on the approvals. RE, PONSE TO CONDITIQNS OF A ' . (1�AL Conditions 2, 3, 5, 7, and 10-18 of the Notice of Decision are applicable to the construction of the parking lot. They are addressed below, 2, The site plan has been revised to preserve as many as the trees as possible. The southern edge of the parking has been relocated to the north approximately 16 feet with the deletion of 5 parking spaces, An arborist report is being submitted under separate cover and will be addressed to Mark Roberts, 3, This request is for tree removal and a site development permit. 5. The landscape plan has been revised and is enclosed. 7, The driveway access onto S.W. Oreenburg road has been deleted. 10, The applicant site plan incorporates the ultimate right of way width and will dedicate the additional 7 feet. The city should decide how that dedication should take place and inform the applicant, 11. The applicants utility plan has the required site and street lighting, 12. The required sidewalks have been provided. (503) 626 -0455 Vax (503) 526 -0775 Planning 4 Engineering +' Surveying Landscape Arclhitecture. Environmental Services 13. The grading plan indicates the existing and proposed grades. 14. A bio- filtration ,3wale has been provided on the grading and utility plan. 15. A drainage report is being provided under separate cover. 16. The applicant can provide the fee in lieu of to underground the overhead lines on Greenburg road. 17. Existing underground utilities that need to be removed and capped will be provided. 18. The entire building will be removed and any excavation will be replaced with compacted structural fill, The above should answer the conditions of approval, Should you have any question or comments please contact me directly at 626 -0455, W & H PACIFIC HOK/kal cc: Randy ,Kyte, Winrnar Post-1V Fax Note 7671 Date pages' To (4 •se,t-V., From 0 Qfde Co. /Dept. ` Co, )' d t'-rJ Phone it Phone # - / Fax it 5,26_0-775 Fax # 1-\ _ Qe, r l rLA); i t4e.ed ( �� ` e co (y J/ o et � rev- -rite 641 P.k- re 5 utttred Cow) .,11) c (4.5 o 64. Arpite) je eec&t re ` r ( Lied cjs ep, r t.- 1.4411 ,S, 4(!g. ot4faettal Wok PACIFiC 8405 S,W, Nimbus Avenue Beaverton, OR 97008 t20 June 6, 1996 Revised July 3, 1996 Mr. Mark Roberts City of Tigard 13125 SW Fall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 SDR 93-0025 MIS 94 -0002 MIS 94 -0003 REQUEST FOR GRADING AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT Dear Mark: 414, Enclosed is a copy of a grading and site development permit application that we have submitted to the building department and Engineering, I have copied you on this so that you can coordinate the planning approval more effectively. Additionally I have gone through the conditions of approval and responded to those as they relate to the parking lot expansion. Also enclosed is my letter to you last year requesting a one year extension on the approvals, RESPONSE TO C".()tND (1ONS OF APPROVAL Conditions 2,1, 5, 7, and 10 -18 of the Notice of Decision are applicable to the construction of the parking lot. They are addressed below. 2. The site plan has been revised to preserve as ninny as the trees as possible. The southern edge of the parking has been relocated to the north approximately 16 feet with the deletion of 5 parking spaces. An arborist report is being submitted under separate cover and will be addressed to Mark Roberts, 3, This request is for tree removal and a site development permit. 5, The landscape plan has been revised and is enclosed. 7, The driveway access onto S.W. Greenburg road has been deleted, 10. The applicant site plan incorporates the ultimate right of way width and will dedicate the additional 7 feet. The city should decide how that dedication should take place and inform the applicant. 11. The applicants utility plan has the required site and street lighting. 12. The required sidewalks have been provided. (503) 026.0455 Fax 003) 526 -0775 Planning a Engineering Surveying 4 Landscape Architecture i Environmental Services 0 d 13. The grading plan indicates the existing and proposed grades. 14. A bio- filtration swale has been provided on the grading and utility plan. 15, A drainage report is being provided under separate cover. 16. The applicant can provide the fee in lieu of to underground the overhead lines on Greenburg road. 17. Existing underground utilities that need to be removed and capped will be provided. 18. The entire building will be removed and any excavation will be replaced with compacted structural fill. CONDITIONS FLT► Tip , TO 1%U1L1MNC CnNST T 1, The required number of bicycle racks will be provided when a building is proposed. 4, The site plan take into consideration the pedestrian access to the site. 6, The required number of handicapped parking will be provided when a building is constructed. 8. The county's concerns related to the access on Greenburg Rd. and right of way. The original site plan was revised to eliminate access onto Greenburg and limit access to the existing roadway #4 to Washington Square. 9, The two remaining parcels have been consolidated. The above should answer the conditions of approval. Should you have any question or cornrYnts please contact me directly at 626 -0455, Sincerely, W & I-1 PACIFIC Hal Keever, ASLA Associate Principal in Charge I:IGK/kal ce: Randy Kyte, Winmar Jim Funk The Washington County Department of Transportation Planning reviewed this proposal due t. its location on Greenburg Road which is the County's responsibility for ongoing maintenance and design issues. The County indicated that the proposed access location shown from Greenburg Road must be eliminated due to the site's location at the intersection of Greenburg Road and Access Road #4. The County standard for allowing access to Greenburg Road is that a minimum of 600 foot spacing must be maintained between access points. A traffic analysis is currently being performed by the County Traffic Analyst for this area which is known as the " Hall /Greenburg /Scholls Study Area ". The findings and recommendations will be forwarded to the City upon completion. The County Transportation Planning Department provided the following Conditions of Approval for this development: 1. Dedicate additional r °„ht -of -way to provide 49 feet from centerline of Greenburg Road frontage. 2. Sign a waiver not to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district or other mechanism to improve the base facility of SW Greenburg Road frontage. 3. Establish a one -foot non - access reserve strip along SW Greenburg frontage. 4. Submit Plans, obtain Engineering Division approval, and obtain a facility permit for construction of the following public improvements: a. Concrete sideway to County standard along SW Greenburg Road frontage. b. Any additional off -site safety improvements found to be required for compliance with R &O 86 -95 upon completion of County Traffic Analyst's review. Prior to Occupancy the road improvements required in conjunction with Conditk fps A.4 above shall be completed and accepted by the County. The Oregon Department of Transportation reviewed this proposal and requested that the Traffic Report for the site investigate more completely the relationship between the site and the intersection of SW Greenburg Road and SW Hall Boulevard. The agency also indicated that the Traffic Study should contain an analysis of vehicle trips traveling to the site in addition to the current analysis of the expected impact of vehicle trips leaving the site. NOTICE OF DECISION SDP. 93 -0025 - W & H PACIFIC Page 5 J • ' , • i. 74; tm W%% #4114.(,..e a v lac cio'edii- dlr.< %,i14)'S tit 5 p ved I u (4e pc! ; fr c.e.y ;At, litoted v 4-) Lti4 42_ f ve.e 5 4.1 6 p Zoi ?a 11f (t• 51tAA;(&(.% f•-vt.ea4Utle1 LA.,141 uciTef e'ic142,617;i2e/ 4 as 040 , Wa.fr.b 4 e e0 pr I IC a f Pk e Qt.,/ 1 47 ---71471 a ve. 10 P .Calo -Ikre fri Vti r- veg e V-4 rx 4-ree ave oet 47. 4/ Owl e e. r"f-- amok /am ,5; a(/(J 64. re v 1 ee e AV 4111e, v I 60 a e "C•l< c-4,41.-: 0-sj 1-4 ye( 16:41 2/14 41," 7,1 k ray-a 1, I 14,t WI 4 Or • .4i WILLIAM L. OWEN and ASSOCIATES Tree and Landscape Consulting Services P.O. BOX 641, PORTLAND, OREGON 97207 503/222 -7007 July 2, 1996 Mr. Jimmy Bellomy W & H Pacific 8405 SW Nimbus Avenue Beaverton, OR 97008 -7120 RE: Winmar Company, Inc. - Washington Square Parking Area Project/ Job #4-1276-5504 Attention: IIal Keever Dear Mr. Bellomy: As per your instructions, I have inspected on two occasions the subject property and construction site and the trees located thereon subject to construction impact as shown in the drawings supplied me by you, (Sheet C -1 /Parking area grading and utility plan/Winmar Co, Inc.) The purpose of the inspection was to: 1) report on the condition, type and size of the trees involved, and 2) report on the prognosis for preservation of the trees, including methodologies to enhance the chances for their survival during the construction process. The method used in my inspection was 1) to locate each of the trees shown on the plot plan with the help of my field assistant (see attached plot plan with numbered trees) 2) check the trunk diameter measurements of the trees at approximately 4,50' above the ground (whether the trees were single or multi- stemmed), 3) assess their overall condition visually, and 4) review their locations with respect to impact on trees 6 and 7 particularly of sidewalk construction, and the effects of the bioswail as shown on the drawings meandering through the tree grove ending in the pond at the west end. The trees were inspected close up and from a distance to ascertain the overall facade, general condition and appearance of the grove from a variety of angles, as they would be observed in this commercial location by the general public. INSPECTION, DIAGNOSIS AND EVALIIATION OE TREES, SEIRIJI S AND RELATED PLANTINGS. CC)NSI ILTATION Wrru RESPECT TO PLANTING, TRANSPLANTING, PRESERVATION. MAINTENANCE AND ARBOREAL PLANNING, COMPRE;E IENSIVE LOSS OR DAMAGE REPORTS. DI lLY SANG :TIONEI) APPRAISALS E''OR LEGAL OR CONTRACTUAL PURPOSES. LEGALLY ACCEPTABLE TESTIMONY IN Col IRT CASES. _ �, �.,. �_.._ .._..w.....,._......,....,_.,. , , .. �.. W�... ��. WW.__ .�._.,....�....___...��..... ,., ��... y. ,. �.. w,. w.,-.. �. .. Y.. W„.._... ww ..r�.,....._._,.......w,.�.... .. � ,..,.r....u..,....W.�W,t_.. Mr. Jimmy Bellomy Page 2 July 2, 1996 Based on my inspections I can report the following: 1) I see no reason that any of th ; trees, with the exception of #18 in the center of the pond and possibly #19 to the south edge of the cuts for the pond, cannot be preserved through this construction process. There will be impacts on the trees and the tree roots, but given the species, their sizes and conditions at this time, and considering that I will be present during actual construction impacts on all of the subject trees at all critical times during the construction process to ascertain impact and recommend remedial therapies, the trees should sustain this construction and have a good prognosis for survival, 2) The sidewalk impact to trees 6 and 7 will be close but can be done. The trees can be preserved provided precautions which I will require are taken during the construction process, Some specialized forming may be necessary to accommodate the trees but they are decent specimens worth the trouble because of the quality of the trees, It must be recognized of course that building a sidewalk close to any tree creates the possibly for future cracking of the walk by the tree roots. That is present here, without question. However, it should be some years before that occurs, and, wit professional root pruning periodically, the trees are worth retaining, despite that factor. 3) The bioswail as shown in the drawings maneuvers through the trees in a sensible manner with respect to tree preservation. Given some aeeway to adjust the route of the bioswail as it moves east to west through the grove, I believe the trees will accommodate the construction impact, This opinion is based on careful inspection of the plot of the trees in the grove together with a study or your sketch of the bioswail dimension necessities, particularly with the two: one slope, six to eight inch depth overall, and only three foot wide bottom to the swail. This will require overall a "disturbance alley" of approximately seven to eight feet width through the grove, which will impact roots to some degree in the slope of the swail but should not be severely injurious, particularly to anchor roots, Individual impacts can be dealt with as we go through the construction process to ascertain how much impact will occur to the root system of a given tree and what remedial therapies are indicated, In no case do I anticipate disturbing a tree sufficiently with this impact to cause its removal, They will, survive the construction trauma given professional care which I will prescribe at the appropriate time during and post construction. 4) Your marked plot plan indicated the potential to save 23 trees. With additional stems from multi-stem bases, 27 larger trees can be saved. In addition, there are a considerable number of smaller trees (mostly Fir) located in the grove which can remain and accent the larger Pines. W & 11 Pacific /W140 & Assoc 119636 Mr. Jimmy Bellamy Page 3 July 2, 1996 5) The trees are in a grove and therefore poorly branched down low from typical crowding in a grove situation on the interior side. Those which are facing the outer facade without interruption have more full growth to the outer edges, to the north and south particularly. However with 1) cleaning out of the deadwood and light pruning as necessary for the damaged roots and scaffold growth, and 2) soil injection fertilizing by prescription which. I will set based on the time of completion of construction, the trees have a very good chance for survival and good performance as landscape amenities over time. 6) The opinions given herein as to prognosis for survival, construction impact, remedial therapies, etc. all are made on the assumption that I will be present during all tree impact related work through completion of construction. In this manner, the level of success for tree preservation can be elevated far beyond what it would be in other circumstances. An added advantage here is the trees are of medium size, and vigorous and young enough, to give us plenty of energy and positive response to the trauma. The prognosis is good. As I understand the requirements for the preliminary report, I believe the above information is sufficient for your needs at this time. If you need additional information to this report please let me know immediately and I will provide it forthwith. Thank you very much, Very truly yours, William L. Owen, B.S., M.A., G.A. American Society of Consulting Arborists #114 W & ti Pacific /WLO & Assoc 49636 .4 W & H PACIFIC WINMAR COMPANY, INC. Job #4-1276-5504 SITE TREES TO BE PRESERVED Number Size Species 1 (Multi-stem) 16" - 19" - 10" Pine 2 22" Pine 3 (Split-stem) 21" - 14" Pine 4 12" Pine 5 11" Pine 6 17 Pine ____ 7 18" Pine 8 17" Pine 9 12" Pine 10 (Split-stem) 14" - 15" Pine 11 20" Pine .........0.........*Noni 12 wx..........*r..•••*M■••.Wr....■O•I+••• 22" Pine 13 (Split-stem) 12" - 15" Pine 14 11" Fir 15 (Split-stem) 8"-13" Pine 16 911 Fir 17 (Split-stem) 11" - 8" Fir 18 16" Pine 19 14" r....*....0. Fir ON+ .Mr0.....1.•••■■••••••*1.0 20 ....100....,..* ....0.............■■•••••woM 19" Pine W & H Pacific/ft0 & Assoc #9636 SFiff \ H L \ wr I Y 4z 1 Jug♦ • \ \ \! \ \ \\\ I, \ \ 237.9 I 3 a co �o 0 r� ii �r i •`.:.r w A ) . 1 ; ia ,; 4.4 t14 -:1., � tk,41>!.Y.:4' ..7. 1 I \ \ s...70 \ \ .\ \ ‘, ,,i .' 0 t «i1,:m:w ri +%:JEfa: lE7dtXLil 11M: a1 _: #ft$rt,.= .°:a'.,..., ',....... .. 1 . • .itY+y 4 . rr. ,« .... "11 S ROAD NO 4 Nm.i..i...M. -..ia i +.nm..J 4 PACIFIC; 8405 S.W. Nimbus Avenue Beaverton, OR 97008-7120 July 23, 1996 Mr. Mark Roberts City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall ]boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: WASHINGTON SQUARE PARKING LOT SDR 93 -0025 S.I.T. #96-0034 WV &H PACIFIC FILL NO. 4-1276-6002 Dear Mark: -/Zis / 't� r Au,vie,41 245 W &H Pacific applied for a time extension for the above referenced project July 12, 1995 and was granted an extension of one year. In compliance with this extension, Winmar and W&H Pacific are to have substantial site construction underway by August 18, 1996. The enclosed photographs and invoice for site demolition show you that we have complied with the City's direction, To date, Winmar has spent $31,443.64 toward site work. We are still coordinating with Jim Funk, City of Tigard plans examiner for the appropriate site permits. We are eagerly awaiting our site development permit so we can continue with construction. Should you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, cc: Randy :Kyle, Win nar Dwayne Ki:tna, Winmar Jim Linton, Winmar John I {uhf, Winmar Hal Keever, W&.F Pacific File °' �� - FaX Note 7671 Date ,� � �� # of NI 0. i 7.; 1✓Lt From / / o l.,e�• «� Co./Dept. Co.'' e- Phone # Phone # ? eV ' l Fix # so.. P✓ '` Fax # (503) 6260455 Fax (503) 526-0775 Planning + l✓ngineering Surveying • Landscape Architecture e tinvironmentul Services ® 07/26/96 08:49 °8'503 684 7297 CITY OF TIGARD Iooi 1 "1"1 ''1 I t t Y'1i t •1 11.:x' .1..1. ,I..1. `I, 4' t ,I T .I..I..1.:I t .1..1..p'1.'I, .I..1.1 1 1 1 ttt ACTIVITY MANAGEMENT REPORT RX 'It ,....1 .1..1..1. •1, ,1. •1..1..1..1. •1.1 .1..1..1..1..1.1.1..1..1..1. ,1..1..1..1..1..• 6 1..1.16666 ,,. ,1...... """T ACTY# (7 t ...... ' 1i11kI1Ir�1lI1lki1l41fl111EdlEI111Efd .1. •l * ACTIVITY MANAGEMENT REPORT TX •1° •!� 1' ''v 1 1 1 1! 1 1 1 1 I d! I 1 1 I 1 1 *4. t.1 'P 1 1 1 1 `.......1 "1'.i''1*:P t : : "I: ACTY# CONNECTION ID MODE USAGE T. CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID START TIME USAGE T. PAGES RESULT *7099 TX 1 G3 503 274 0123 SRI SHAPIRO 07/24 14:27 01'09 2 OK :1:7104 TX *7102 G3 6208759 PAUL HUNT 07/24 15:28 00'39 1 OK *7115 TX G3 07/24 15:07 04'22 07/25 07:25 01'09 2 OK *7120 TX 07/24 15:39 G3 5036203433 503 TIGARD TIMES 07/25 09:42 00'40 1 OK *7126 TX 2 G3 15036848878 AUTO RX G3 07/25 11:49 01'38 4 OK *7131 TX *7110 G3 503 526 0775 07/25 13:31 03'07 7 OK :I :7140 TX 629 0647 G3 503 620 2086 NICOLI ENG.,Inc. 07/25 15:42 02'03 4 OX *7141 TX 07/25 00 :07 G3 1 503 639 1471 OX 07/25 15 :45 02'30 4 OK *7144 TX 5 G3 5262479 AUTO RX G3 07/25 16:21 04'25 6 OK 7150 TX *7118 AUTO RX G3 6397563 07/26 08 :41 00'00 0 NG *7119 AUTO RX G3 5035260775 07/25 09 :24 01'41 3 OX *7121 0 #018 7153 TX 07/25 09 :43 G3 503 526 0775 OX 07/26 08:46 00'40 1 OK 1 "1"1 ''1 I t t Y'1i t •1 11.:x' .1..1. ,I..1. `I, 4' t ,I T .I..I..1.:I t .1..1..p'1.'I, .I..1.1 1 1 1 ttt ACTIVITY MANAGEMENT REPORT RX 'It ,....1 .1..1..1. •1, ,1. •1..1..1..1. •1.1 .1..1..1..1..1.1.1..1..1..1. ,1..1..1..1..1..• 6 1..1.16666 ,,. ,1...... """T ACTY# MODE CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID START TIME USAGE T. PAGES RESULT *7098 AUTO RX G3 503 684 4076 07/24 14:21 00'36 1 OX *7100 AUTO RX G3 07/24 14:53 02'27 3 OK *7102 AUTO RX 03 5032273590 07/24 15:05 01'02 2 0K *7103 AUTO RX G3 07/24 15:07 04'22 9 OK *7106 AUTO RX 0,3 503 243 2944 07/24 15:39 02'32 4 OK *7107 AUTO RX G3 503 635 3174 PAC LAND MONT 07/24 15 :59 01'11 2 OK *7109 AUTO RX G3 5033781861 07/24 16 :07 01'28 3 OK *7110 AUTO RX G3 1 503 538 1670 07/24 16:45 01'13 2 OX *7112 AUTO RX G3 629 0647 07/24 17:10 00'41 1 0K *7113 AUTO RX 03 07/25 00 :07 00'58 2 OX *7114 AUTO RX G3 503 6587378 07/25 06 :49 02'34 5 OK *7117 AUTO RX G3 503 287 6164 07/25 08 :09 00'41 1 OK *7118 AUTO RX G3 07/25 08 :52 01'13 3 OK *7119 AUTO RX G3 5035260775 07/25 09 :24 01'41 3 OX *7121 AUTO RX G3 5032244836 07/25 09 :43 00'49 1 OX *7124 AUTO RX 03 5032211171 07/25 10 :55 00'40 1 OK *7125 AUTO RX 03 503 378 2322 07/25 11 :30 00'49 1 OK *7127 AUTO RX G3 503 243 2044 07/25 12 :15 03'49 6 Olt *7128 AUTO RX G3 503 681 2908 07/25 12:21 00'49 1 OK *7129 AUTO RX G3 503 378 2322 07/25 12 :53 00'49 1 OK *7132 AUTO RX 03 503 641 6613 ALLEN /.TALK INC, 07/25 13:51 00'49 1 OK *7134 AUTO RX 03 07/25 14 :56 01'42 3 OK *7135 AUTO RX G3 503 223 2701 07/25 15 :01 02'29 4 OX *7136 AUTO RX G3 5036447400 07/25 15 :36 01'01 1 OX *7137 AUTO RX 03 503 243 2944 07/25 15 :38 02'26 4 OK *7143 AUTO 17X G3 503 243 2944 07/25 16 :18 02'36 4 OK *7146 AUTO 17X 03 5036448034 07/25 17:49 01'16 2 OK *7147 AUTO RX 03 503 671 0103 07/26 06 :46 02'28 3 OK 7149 AUTO 17X 03 503 678 1108 07/26 08 :20 00'46 1 OK • . �. P.0, Box 9410 Ologoo .0/0/0 503/638•6Doo Fx g03/0M1 1 0 1 ,t) Winmar Company, Inc. 700 Fifth Avenue, 2600 Key Tower P.O. Box 21545 Seattle, Washington 98111-3545 DEMOLITION & DISMANTLING June 26, 1996 Attention: James S. Linton, Vice President Director of Construction Re: Washington Square Shed Demolition Dear Mr, Linton: Please find attached our invoice #06256 covering the demolition and clean-up of the Washington Square Maintenance Shed. As you will notice, the clean-up for debris inside, as well as outside, was extensive, Roger ott's crew removed only those items that were of value to the Washington Square Maintenance Department and left all remaining material, Mot only was there a considerable amount of material inside the shed but there was also years' of accumulation of material outside the building inside the fenced yard area which we were asked to load and remove from the site. We also encountered a small amount of asbestos floor tile in the office area which had to be removed. We had this done by Lake Oswego insulation, Please see the attached invoice.. Jim, at the time we quoted this job we did not anticipate this magnitude or volume of additional work nor did we set a dollar figure for it, other than that we would use our schedule of charges for determining the cost. Once we received your contract, which was approximately when we finished the work, we saw where your office had stated additional work at approximately $3,000.00. if, after reviewing our invoice, the cost of tnis job presents a problem, I would appreciate a call from you and we will resolve it in any manner that you feel is acceptable. As always, we are most appreciative of the opportunity to work for you and Winmar Company, Inc. BHS/ms Sincerely, V.S-1 / Brian H. smith President Derno Mom, Dismantling, Salvage and Excavation ° ' PO. Om 930 Otocpo 9/7)/0 TI. 503163846)Oo F,x nown) IflI) • . • Winmar Company, Inc. 700 Fifth Aventle, 2600 Key Tower P.O. Box 21545 Seattle, Washington 98111-3545 Washington Squ are Shed Demolition Lump Sum Quotat Change Order #12 6/14/96 Laborers - Bobcat - 6 h Pick-up - Dai C4 Truck - 4 6/15/96 Laborers - 2 me Bobcat - 5 hours Pick-up - Daily C5 Truck - 3 hour Disposal - Box of Disposal - Box of Change Order U13-96 6/18/96 Laborers * 3 men - 2 Bobcat - 2 1/2 hours C4 Truck - 2 1/2 hours ion -96 • ' , • INVOICE #06256 men - 6 hours ea. @ $35.00/nour ours 8 $75.00/hour ly Rate hours @ $85,00/hour n - 5 hours ea. 0 $75.00/hour Rate s 0 $85,00/hour wood trash - $253.65 x 1,18 2 $35.00/hour 1/2 hrs. ea. 8 $35.00/hr 0 $75.00/hour @ $85.00/hour 6/19/96 Laborer - 4 1/2 hours @ Laborers - 2 men - 8 hrs Bobcat - 8 hours 8 $75,00 C4 Truck - 8 hours 8 $85.0 Disposal - Box of wood Komatsu 40) - 3 hours 8 $22 Tire Removal - $117.00 x 1.1 Change Order #14-96 6/20/96 Laborers - 3 men - 4 hours ea. Komatsu 400 - 2 hours 0 $225.00 Bobcat - 4 hours 0 $75.00/hour Disposal - Box of wood Disposal - Debris/DeVoe Landscape Disposal - 1/2 box of trash - 1/2 Asbestos Testing - $22.50 x 1.18 Asbestos Removal - $829.70 x 1.18 $35.00/hour ea. 8 $35.00/hour /hour 0/hour 5.00/hour 8 0 $35.00/hour /hour Net Due Net due 30 days. 1% per month charged on past due accounts. Equivalent to 12'6 annually. Demolition, Dismantling. Salv ..00DEMOLITION & DISMANTLING $175.00 x 1.18 x $371.48 x June 25, 1996 $ 420.00 $ 450.00 $ 50.00 $ 340.00 $ 350.00 $ 375.00 $ 50,00 $ 255.00 0.00 $ 299,31 $ 262.50 $ 187.50 $ 212.50 $ 22,780.00 $ 1,260.00 $ 1,329.31 $ 662.50 $ 157.50 $ 560.00 $ 600.00 $ 680.00 0.00 $ 675.00 $ 138.06 $ 2.810.56 $ 420.00 $ 450.00 $ 300.00 0.00 $ 206.50 $ 219.17 age ,.nd Excavation $ 1,555.67 26.5 $ 575.05 $ 31,443.64 fri r' 4 • '.n DEMOLITION & DISMANTLING FO. Box 930, Wilsonville, OR 97070 (503) 638-6900 FAX (503) 638-1019 TO Aie\AsA.,, L . ?(.9C) ,/ONE AGE r 1111)4 Number JOB NAM/LOCA11ON JOB NUMBER JOB PHONE EXISTING CONTRACT NO CATE OF EXISTING CONTRACT We hereby agree to make the change(s) specified below: ) 1 6 .1) 67,6--1 )) 194 ,,,,, • • 11. • /) cs)v-Qp40% e , ..6 0 Lu.et:k 66( „A' Yvia,.(1‹.s7, „ '2••• IA- kr,4 /12_ $ . ik 14.1- s P.Q/v4.41-1,-t e.1 6 4/ r Wa,s C NOTE: This Change Order becomes part of and in conformance with the existing contract. WE AGREE hereby to make the change(s) specified above at this price tf), $ 440.44.4.4.404*.4.4•444 ■••,-4**14444 .4444444.-44444 444444444.4.4.441. 0,44444.1-4.444 BATE AUTHORIZL:0 SICINAFONL (C)NTRACTOP) • ,,,,,,, 44441.4.444.4.* 4■1*.44.4.44444.44* PREVIOUS CONTRACT AMOUNT ACCEPT50 — The above prices and specifications of this Change Order are satisfactory and are hereby accepted, All work to be performed under same terms and conditions as specified in original contract unless otherwise stipulated. 4.4a414441441444444•444.4* .444444* 44.4**4 REVISED CONTRACT TOTAL Date of acceptance Signature — (OWNER) • • • DEMOLITION & DISMANTLING P. 0 , Box 930, Wilsonville, OR 97070 Number DATE - JOB NUMBER JOB PHONE DATE OF EXISTING CONTRACT 1 We hereby agree to make the change(s) specified below: I 157 d / (AJO d i/-7,71:t2,5k 6x. NO E : his Change Order becomes part of at i con ormance w h the existing contract. WE AGREE hereby to make the change(s) specified above at this price c:› $ PREVIOUS CONTRACT AMOUNT PUT,-.0MIZED SICNAIURhWONTRACTON REVISE-0 CONTRACT TOTAL ACCEPTED — The above prices and specifications of this Change Order are satisfactory and are hereby Date' of acceptance accepted. All work to be performed under same terms and conditions as specified in original contract unless Signature otherwise stipulated. • ,; TO DEMOLITION & DISMANTLING P.O, Box 930, Wilsonville, OR 97070 (503) 638 -6900 FAX (503) 638 -1019 eo .... ?Do rk Luca,,, Sic) 1 --.. • �r. Number /% �6 6 Pc JOE NAME /LOCATION JOS PHONE EXISTING CONTRACT NO. OF EXISTING CONTRACT I We hereby agree to make the change(s) specified below: A/crim.,04L,.. ,/ f g ) 0 .,eL, ,y Yz f i-+� -s 4./2 I, ll ,, ►- 5 NOTE: This Change Order becomes part of and in conformance with the existing contract. WE AGREE hereby to make the change(s) specified above at this price c.) CATE PREVIOUS CONTRACT AMOUNT AUTHORIZe .) ti.CI .ATI.)r41; (C.ON111A41 Ora) ACCEPThD — The above prices and specifications of this Change Order are satisfactory and are hereby accepted, All work to be performed under same terms and conditions as specified in original contract unless otherwise stipulated. REVISED CONTRACT TOTAL bate of acceptance Signature '!'I1 • `a, I'. .'!1 ' o Fli'.11,11■1i, 01 ,1jrE• 1{ hit Creative Solutions . , . Superior Service PACT FTC 8405 S.W. Nimbus Avenue Beaverton, OR 97008 -7120 (503) 626 -0455 • Planning *Surveying • Environmental Fax (503) 526 -0775 • Engineering • Landscape Architecture Services • °3UL.17.1995 4:03PM W &H PACIFIC PACIFk 8405 S.W. Nimbus Avenue Beaverton, OR 97008-7120 July 17, 1996 Mr, Roberts City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Winrmar/Washington Square Parking Lot - City of Tigard SDR 93.0025 File Not 4. 1276 -6002 Dear Mark; NO.458 P.1/4 1 am writing in regards to the above referenced project and as a follow -up to our meeting on July 15, 1996. We have revised our plans to accommodate the reque,sts you have made regarding tree preservation (plans attached), We are also scheduling the installation of the tree protection fencing for the end of the week or as soot as We contractor can perform the work, 1havehad several conversations with Washington County regarding their conditions of approval and it appears that the Cot my never completed the tattle analysis that is required by R&O 86.95. 1 have spoken directly with Tom Ilany at the County and he said he would process the required paperwork as long as we guaranteed that no building was being constructed at this time, 1 assume you have talked with Tom and verified that this phase is for parking lot construction only Norm Rindal (Washington County 1✓ngineering Review) h€u visited the site and has written a letter to the City of Tigard (COT) regarding Washington County requirements at this time (letter attached), The County is requesting the COT to issue permits and provide inspection for the existing driveway closure and sidewalk eon.9truetion along Orenburg Road. With this request made,1 assume all issues with the County for this phase of construction is complete, We understand that a traffic analysis pursuant to ' &O 86 -95 will need to be completed prior to building construotiat, At this time I request your assistance with the review letter prepared by Jim Funk at the COT (iettri attached). Jim has requested some extraordinary work be completed for this parking facility. 1 feet he does not understand specifically what we are doing, If you could please speak with him regarding item 3 of his letter 1 would greatly appreciate it, The fndditian of 7 accessible parking spaces in this parking lot that is so far removed from the main Washington Square complex seems to neeess►ry at this time, We walize in the future when we r ohstract the 25k sq. ft, retail center we will provide the accessible spaces and required accessible route, The other items in t*, Punts letter (1 -2 &4) are currently being provided and we have already obtained a demoliaon permit. (50) 626 0455 Frix (,sus) 526-0775 planning • Engineering • Surveying • LandscapeArehitectuie • l nvironnteetal Srvkt s 'UL .17.1996 4 : 03PM Mr. Roberts July L7, 1996 Page 2, WREN PACIFIC No.458 P.2/4 Please cone me once you have reviewed the above and attached so that we may discuss your opinion. As always, your assistance with this matter is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, yB:, y, A.S,L.A. JABS /mip at 'Laments I:*j t112766OO21Wpriato∎ccto717,1rr • 311.17.1996 4:03PM - W &H PACIFIC WASHINGTON COUNT?, OREGON Departrnentof Land Use and Transportation, Engineering Services 155 North First Avenue, Suite 350 -17, Millsboro, Oregon 87124 (503) 693 -4563. FAX: (503) 693.4412 Brian Roger city of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, Or 07223 RE SDR 934025, Parking lot on Greenburg Rd NO.458 P.3/4 July 1611996 Washington County would like the city of Tigard to issue permits and inspect the following construction: • The removal of the existing access from the site onto Greenburg Rd and the construction of curb and gutter in place of the driveway; • The construction of a pcc sidewalk of a minimum width of 5 feet from the back of the curb. This has been confirmed with Al Girard, Washington County Construction Management Supervisor, Norm Rindal, Washington County Road Engineering Design Plan Review, and Brian Roger, city of Tigard Development Review Engineer. If you hove any questions please call me at 648 -8G97. cc: Jimmie Bellamy; W &H Pacific file a• 3UL.17.1996 4 :04PM W&H PACIFIC July 12, 1998 NO, 458 P.4,4 W & H Pacific 8405 SW Nimbus Avenue Beaverton, OR 97008 RE: Parking Lot Site Plan Review 9385 SW Greenburg Road PC #: 6 -90c SIT#: 96.0034 CITY OF TGARD OREGON Submittal documents for the above referenced project have been reviewed for conformance with the applicable 1998 Oregon Specialty Codes and other applicable codes and standards. The following comments are noted; 6; IQ' ��ll 11�fjtt, 11' f{ {, '� R �,r,rr ' I t1I r., IV141 IN'1r'i, Q',{ S.,l„t,$i6,, 0,9 l 'I . f 1 / f i ,I . 1. Provide an erosion control plan in accordance with United Sewerage Agency requirements. 2. A Demolition Permit is required. 3, Parking facilities which are used in conjunction with adjacent building parking needs shall have accessible parking facilities; constructed, striped, signed, and maintained as required by ORS 4471233. A, Provide seven (7) accessible parking facilities with access aisles and signage. Submit details and a new parking lot plan. 1, Accessible parking stalls for the disabled shall have signs and pavement markings of the international symbol of accessibility clearly visible and designed to standards adopted by the Oregon Department of Transportation [Section 3104(d) 9], 13. At least one accessible route shall be provided within the boundary of the site, from public transportation, public streets or sidewalks, to all buildingls and accessible site facilities (:OSSO, Section 11034 The new parking lot plan shall define the route, curb ramps, crossing, and signage. 4 Provide the total of all construction costs for permit fee calculation, Please submit three copies of revised submittal documents and a letter indicating your response to the above comments for review, Please call me at (S03) 639.4171 if you have any duestions. Sinoly, . Jima Punk PLANS EXAMINER ay lAcIty VvIda1pc6•00c,4oc 13125 SW Hcill Blvd, Ti6ord, or 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (50) 684.2772 'Ally 20, 1995 W & H Pacific Attention: Hal Keever 8405 SW Nimbus Avenue Beaverton, OR 97008 -7120 Re: SDR 93-0025 MIS 94 -0002 MIS 94 -0003 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Dear Hal; This letter is in response to your request for a time extension on the above approvals. I have reviewed the status of the Lot Line Adjustment requests (MIS 94 -0002 and MIS 94 -0003) and it appears that no time extension is necesrary for these requests as the latest Assessor Maps show the changes which weL °e proposed by these adjustments. An to site Development Review 93-0025 the Director hereby approves a one year time extension to the Site Development Review approval based on the following approval criteria: 1) No changes are proposed to the original site development review plan as approved by the Director; 2) The applicant states that construction on the site is to begin within one year; and ) There have been no changes to the applicable development standards upon which the approval was based. Because Site Development Review 93 -0025 was originally approved for an 18 month period from February 18, 1994 to August 18, 1995 this application will now expire August 18, 1996. Substantial site development construction will need to have begun on the site by that time Please feel free to contact me concerning this information, Sincerely, C-Oiate Mark Roberts Associate Planner, AICP 13125 SW Hall Blvd., %lard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772 PAC,IFiC 8405 S,W, Nimbus Avenue Beaverton, FOR 97008-7120 RECEIVED PLANNING July 12, 1995 Mr, Mark Roberts City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: SDR 93 -0025 MIS 94 -0002 MIS 94 -0003 REQUEST FOR ONE YEAR EXTENSION ON APPROVALS Dear Mark; Per our conversation I am writing you to request a one year extension on the above approvals. Not ;ong ago the Winmar Company met with you to discuss the first phase of this project, which includes the construction of a parking lot and a future retail use W&H Pacific is currently preparing the required plans and specifications, but are unable to get them submitted by July 18, 1995 (expiration of approvals). Additionally we understand that there is no fee required, Please call me to discuss if you have any questions or concerns, Sincerely, &H PA t IFIC l Keevt Associate Director. of Development Services 1IOK/kal cc: Randy Kyle, Winmar (503) 626 -0455 Fax (503) 5/,6 -u775 Planning Engineering • Surveying' Landscape Architecture 6 Environmental Services r.. 1. A*iothe( preapplication conference is - equired if any site develo' 4nt application is submitted t siy months after the preapplication conference; and 2. Failure of the Director to provide any of the information required by this section shall not constitute a waiver of the standard, criteria or requirements applicable to the applications. D. The Director shall approve, approve with conditions or deny any application for site development review as provided by Section 18.32.090. The Director shall apply the standards set forth in Section 18.120.180 when reviewing an application for site development review. E. The decision of the Director may be appealed in accordance with Subsection 18.32.310.A. F. The Director shall mail notice of any site development review proposal decision to the persons who may have the right to request a hearing before the Commission in accordance with Section 18.32.120. (Ord. 89 -06; Ord. 83-52) 18.120.040 Expiration of Approval: Standards for Extension of Time A. Site development review approval by the Director shall be effective for a period of one -and- one --half years front the date of approval. B. The site developmen review approval by the Director shall lapse if: 1. Substantial construction of the approved plan has not begun within a one-and-one-half years period; or 2. Construction on the site is a departure from the approved plan. C. The Director shall, upon written request by the applicant and payment of the required fee, grant an extension of the approval period not to exceed one year; provided that: 1. No changes are made on the original site development review plan as approved by the Director; 2. The applicant can show intent of initiating construction on the site within the one year extension period; and 3. There have been no changes to the applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions on which the approval was based. D. Notice of the decision shall be provided to the applicant. The Director's decision may be appealed by the applicant as provided by subsection 18.32.310.A. (Ord. 90-41; Ord. 89.04; ord. 83 -52) Revised 1/17/91 Page 300 *. ti 7 COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. of Tigard , P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684-0360 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 atttphtice Advertising -0 19 94 5 SW Hail L J. V d Co* pc,AR6 ox 2 3 3 9 7 trd , Oregon 97 2 23 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION OF OREGON, Y OF WASHINGTON, ri Tearsheet Notice Legal e TT 7784 Notic • 0 Duplicate Affidavit REUFNELOPMENT )/EVIEW SDR.2,14K2A4i.oir:04 114 0 A.131EliSLQULITLY/az -, LOCATION; 11590 and 11596 S.W. Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S1 36D1E, fax lots 2600 and 2602), The Dire- ti has ktpprov „gubject to conclitionso,p4 Development Review re- _ tidt ter alto ns iuudidzilif a 56 'hole Miniature golf course to be corn- !st duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising , or his principal clerk, of theT1 Lime )aper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193,010 .020; published at_211,gard in the thcouritv and sta.to;.that the- lop,.i—utizu Garden Golf copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the sue of said newspaper for, ONE successive and tive in the following issues: nary 3 , 1 9 9 4 ad and sworn to b * • r )1s tt t• A - trg• IDIUNIAMILTMEISSIO,20/ • tM • It - • S $ sm. t I4 • --Greetzhe.:=g-Read*WC-TM-48-1-26erta 500), The Director has approved, subject tb conditionsi a Site Develop- ment Review and Lot Line Adjustment requests for a 25,000 square foot iltietailiWiding:bittgar8 ticrettte In the :Washington Square Shopping '.CetiferAP2LICA13LETEVIEW CRI'lt14 .„ e) • twilti.tytP05/00Intleht I Cede Chapters 1842, 18.62, 18.100, 18.106,•1, . i44aidd840; ZONE: C-0 (General Commercial). Thee-9, z9to.Pr.90104 development sites for , major retail goods and services, P tt.`t, • 3 re one this d. day of 'February . irr 14r rt• ” "a • ■", .1;:11‘i t‘t 1 •fission Expires: VIT •.. < 1!„ 4„,or Notary Pubi'dfor Oregon iVo te. 44E4 4' 417 4‘6040AVI is, 'Y. ar• 444 boa ob • I IN alltm II II VI Ow IS 11111-'21mil 11111 kZETZT4]Mt $ITP,J2VE.. • 14 i , 1 $1)191,1026 L'ANEYMMPRESS LOC ! T1ON: 12740 S.W. Pacific Highway (WCF14. 2S1 2BD, tax lot 1503), The Director tlas approved, subject to i conditions, a Site Development Review request to allow coastraction eta drive-dtru food service, to an porictino roirootttamkt 4.amtita.. a a a 9 .• • KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING /TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 610 SW. ALDER, SUITE 700 • PORTLAND, OR 97205 • (503) 228.5230 • FAX (503) 273.8169 January 28, 1994 Project No,: 479.02 Mr. Randy Kyte Winmar Company, Inc. 700 Fifth Avenue Suite 2600 Gateway Tower Seattle, WA 98104 -5026 SUBJECT: Addendum to Traffic Impact Analysis of proposed 25,000 - square foot Retail Store Development on Washington Square Parcel 2 Dear Mr, Kyte: r?ursuant to your request, Kittelson and Associates has performed additional analysis to supplement the findings in the Traffic Impact Analysis of the proposed 25,000 square foot Retail Store Development on Washington Square Parcel 2 submitted in November 1993. This letter documents the results of the additional analysis and addresses the following concerns raised by the Oregon Department of Transportation: The distance from the site access to the intersection at Hall Boulevard and Greenburg Road. Estimates of site - generated traffic in the vicinity of the site as well as estimates of 1995 total traffic volumes including the development of the site. Stacking distance requirements at the intersection at Hail Boulevard and Greenburg Road. The proposed retail store is to be located near the northeast corner of the Washington Square complex. The current site plan calls for a new full- access driveway on Greenburg Road approximately 300 feet from the intersection of Greenburg Road and Hall Boulevard. The site plan also calls for another access driveway located on Access Road Number 4 approximately 190 feet west of the intersection with Greenburg Road, EELLEVUE i PORTLAND 6 SACRAMENTO .1 Mr. Randy Kyte January 23, 1994 Page 2 Future 1995 background traffic volumes were estimated by increasing existing weekday p.m. peak hour traffic volumes presented in Figure 1 by a global factor of 3 percent per year. According to the traffic impact 'analysis submitted in November 1993, the proposed retail center will generate approximately 920 trips on an average weekday, of which 90 will occur in the evening peak hour. Figure 2 presents the site - generated traffic at the intersections in the study area. The background traffic volumes were then added to the site generated volumes to develop the 1995 total weekday p.m. peak hour traffic volumes shown n Figure 2. As discussed in the November 1993 Traffic Impact Analysis, all of the intersections in the study area will continue to operate at acceptable Levels of Service after the retail center is developed. An analysis was conducted on Greenburg Road to ensure that the queues from the signalized Hall Boulevard/Greenburg Road intersection will not block the site access to the driveway. A Poisson distribution was applied to determine queue length probabilities based on average weekday p.m. peak hour volumes, the assumed length of the red interval used in the Level of Service calculations, and the assumption that one vehicle occupies approximately 25 feet. Table 2 presents the results of the stacking distance analysis for the northbound left, through, and right approaches at the intersection. Table 2 Stacking Distance Analysis (90% Confidence Level) Hall Boulevard / Greenburg Road Intersection Movement Queue Length (feet) Available Storage (feet) Adequate Storage Available? NB Left Turn 1993 P.M. Peak 200 300 Yes 1995 P.M. Peak 225 300 Yes NB Through 1993 P.M. Peak 275 300 Yes 1995 P.M. Peak 300 300 Yes NB Right Turn 1993 P.M. Peak 75 300 Yes 1995 P.M. Peak 100 300 Yes • I• • M • Mr, Randy Kyte January 28, 1994 Page 3 As shown in Table 2, the 90th percentile queues from the intersection will not block the proposed site access driveway on Greenburg Road. Based on the results of the traffic analysis described in this letter and the Traffic Impact Study submitted in November 1993, the proposed 25,000 square foot retail store can be developed while still maintaining acceptable levels of traffic operation and safety on the surrounding transportation system. The following conclusions can be drawn from this analysis: • The proposed development is expected to generate 645 daily trips, including 65 new trips during the evening peak hour. • The intersections in the study network will continue to operate at acceptable Level of Services after the retail store has been developed. • Northbound queues from the intersection at Hall Boulevard and Greenburg Road will not block the proposed driveway location. I trust this letter adequately addresses the transportation related issues raised by ODOT concerning the development of this site. If there are any additional questions or concerns you have regarding this analysis, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Da VI A.SebEY‘.4Q-\ Daniel A. Seeman Associate lia A. Kuhn Transportation Analyst Attachments: Figure 1, Figure NORTH (NOT TO SCALE) RUAENSTEINS SITE VICINITY MAP AND EXISTING LANE CONFIGURATIONS RUBENSTEINS ACCESS RD. #4' EXISTING WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES EXISTING TRAFFIC CHA{ ACTEJIST"I C • 25,OOO SQ, FT,. RETAIL STORE FIGURE ', JANUARY 1994 WASHINGTON. SQUAB TWO TIGAFD, O . 4792FIc 25,OOO SQ, FT,. RETAIL STORE FIGURE ', JANUARY 1994 WASHINGTON. SQUAB TWO TIGAFD, O . 4792FIc RUBENSTEINS 1995 WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK HOUR SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC RUBENSTEINS az, am 10.1 10,15 4.... 105 ACCESS 110._#A i;k9) rt;,k'y ve.17 CEMETARY RD. CEMETARY / 1995 WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES ialliele011111101110iNIMOKWIMMOMMIralitill emeastairalftemairtainsim 1E95 WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK HOUR TRAF-ric CHARACTERISTICS 25,000 SQ. FT. RETAIL STORE WASHINGTON SQUARE TWO TIGARD OR JANUARY 1994 INIUW.kilh1111101110151111101•1" ownragavuOmussiametians FIGURE 11111111111111111111111111 MEMORANDUM ANDUM CITY (.F TIGARD, OREGON TO: Mark Roberts February 2, 1994 FROM: Michael Anderson, Development Review Engineer RE: SDR 93 -0025 W & Fi PACIFIC /Washington Square Description: The applicant proposes to construct a 25,000 square foot retail center on a 2.38 acre site at the intersection of SW Greenburg Road and the northerly entrance (Access Road No.4) to the Washington Square development. Findings: 1. STREETS: The applicant has submitted a traffic study prepared by Kittelson & Associates, Inc., dated November 19, 1993. In reviewing projects in the Washington Square area, Engineering staff is relying on the Flall /Greenburg /Scholls Area Traffic Needs Study draft report prepared by Parametrix and dated October, 1993. While not yet completed, the draft report is the most comprehensive traffic review available for the area. The draft report assumed that the subject site, when developed, would generate approximately 92 vehicle trips per peak hour from the new retail development. The traffic report submitted with the application shows that the specific development proposed will generate 920 trips per average weekday and an estimated 65 vehicle trips per peak hour, substantially less than the draft report calculates. The draft ,:epart also identifies improvements needed to correct existing deficiencies and improvements that accommodate expected growth. The only improvements identified in the area of the subject site are the dedication of right -of -way and the improvement of pedestrian facilities. The draft report recommends that sidewalks be improved along SW Greenburg Road and that sidewalks be provided between SW Greenburg Road and the Washington Square retail development. The draft report further indicotes that the existing 5 lane street section on SW Greenburg Road provides adequate traffic capacity and that the existing intersection at Hall Boulevard and SW Greenburg Road will continue to operate at an acceptable level of service. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR93 --25 W & H ?ACIFXC\WASH SO PAGE1 Ik r Therefore, we conclude that no off-site traffic improvements are required except the sidewalk construction as a part of the project development. However, the project will be required to pay the standard traffic impact fees to help fund traffic improvements in the general area. The existing power poles and overhead lines serving the area are located along the westerly side of SW Greenburg Road. The system does not include any street lighting. The applicant should be required to install street lighting, and to underground the overhead system or pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. 2. SANITARY SEWER: The existing 8 inch public sanitary sewer is located in SW Greenburg Road and has sufficient capacity to serve this development. The location of this new service line should be coordinated with the proposed water service connection, also in SW Greenburg Road, in order to minimize the extent of pavement removals and disruption of traffic. 3. STORM SEWER: The site currently slopes in both a northerly and westerly direction, draining onto SW Greenburg Road and toward the underground system in Washington Square. The proposed site construction includes an underground stormdrain system that will direct the storm water to the existing underground system. The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce (Resolution and Order No. 91-47) Surface Water Management Regulations requiring the construction of on- site water quality facilities or fees in-lieu of their construction. The proposed site grading and underground system should be re-designed to incorporate water quality facilities that treat the surface stormwater flows. Recommendations: PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFTED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED: 1. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the SW Greenburg Road frontage to increase the right-of-way to a minimum of 49 feet from centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department (639-4171). 2. The applicant shall provide street lighting along SW Greenburg Road in accordance with the City standards, STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department (639-4171) ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR93-25 W & H PACIFIC\WASH SQ PAGE2 3. Sidewalks shall be constructed along the site frontage on SW Greenburg Road and on Access Road No. 4. The sidewalk may be designed along a meandering route so as to save the existing trees. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department (639-4171). 4. A final grading plan shall be submitted showing the existing and proposed contours. A soils report shall be provided detailing the soil compaction requirements. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department (639- - 4171) . 5. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as established under the guidelines of Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91-47. The final grading plan shall be modified to include a biofiltration swales. The maintenance of the swales shall be the responsibility of Was ington Square. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department (639-4171) 6M The applicant shall demonstrate that the downstream underground system in the Washington Square is adequate for the proposed site and will not be unduly affected by the increase in run- off. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department (639-4171) 7r The applicant shall underground utilities along SW Greenburg Road between the site's northerly property line and Access Road No. 4 to Washington Square, or pay the fee in -lieu of undergrounding. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department (639 - 4171) APPROVED: Rs ida 1 R. Woo e , City Engineer N. \ENGINEEI \SUt.93 -25.m ji ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR93 --25 W & H PACIFIC \WASH SO FAGE3 • • ` 31-A, 1991 /ORM BUILDING CODE TABLE NO. 31-A—NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES MINIMUM REQUIRED NUMBER OF TOTAL PARKING ACCESSIBLE SPACE 4mn--- -- 1-25 I Y 26-50 2 51-75 ' ------ --- 3 76-100 4 3Qlxn5OO 101-150 ----' � _______ 6 )5l-2[0 6 ~�--~~� 201-300 ---- --- 3Ol-400 ' 8 ---^ 401`500 9 50 1-999 2% of total spaces Over 1,000 --~~------ 20 spaces plus ) for every 100 s aces, or fraction thereof, over 1,000. One in every eight accessible spaces. but not less than one shall be served by an acces aisle 96 inches wide nhlnimuni and shall be designated accessible. The vrticaI clearance at such van spaces shall be 98 inches. All such spaces may be grouped on one level of a parking structufe. TABLE NO. 31-B—WHEELCHAIR SPACES REQUIRED IN ASSEMBLY AREAS CAPACITY Op SEATING |N ASSEMBLY An� � NUMBER OF REQUIRED WHEELCHAIR SPACES 4mn--- -- Y 26 to 50 2 -------- 51to3DU 4 3Qlxn5OO _______ 6 Over 500 ~-- ~�--~~� 6, plus 1 for each l / � / \ � ( / \ ° 114 ^ .,� / • •4 x November 19, 1993 Project No.: 479.02 ^XHIBIT "M" KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING /TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 610 SW, ALDER, SUITE 700 • PORTLAND, OR 97205 • (503) 228.5230 • FAX (503) 273.8169 Mr. Randy Kyte Willmar Company, Inc. 700 Fifth Avonue Suite 2600 Gateway Tower Seattle, WA 98104 -5026 SUBJECT: Traffic Impact Analysis of the proposed 25,000 square foot Retail Store Development on Washington Square Parcel 2 Dear Mr. Kyte, Pursuant to your request, Kittelson and Associates has performed a detailed traffic impact analysis of the proposed 25,000 square foot retail store at Washington Square in Tigard, Oregon. This letter documents the findings of the traffic impact analysis. The proposed retail store is to be located near the northeast corner of the Washington Square complex. The 2,4 acre parcel (Parcel 2) is bounded on the east by Greenburg Road and on the south by Access Road Number 4. Parcel. 2 is adjacent to the existing Rubenstein's Furniture Store lot on the northside and has a westerly boundary extending southerly from the end of the Rubenstein lot, The parcel is currently occupied by a small repair shop business, but remains mostly undeveloped. The current site plan calls for a new full access driveway on Greenburg Road at the north end of the parcel, and another access driveway located on Access Road Number 4, approximately 190 feet west of the intersection with. Greenburg Road, Field observations were conducted at Washington Square on November 10th, 1993, . The objective of this field survey was to determine the geometric and traffic conditions during the p.m. peak hour on Greenburg, Road and on the internal circulation system, at Washington Square. BELLEVUt • PORTLAND • SACRAMENTO G Mr. Randy Kyte November 19, 1993 Page 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS The existing traffic conditions for this analysis were obtained by reviewing the rlall /Greenburg /Scholls Area Traffic Needs Study prepared for. the City of Tigard. After reviewing past impact studies and the current Hall /Greenburg /Scholls study, it was determined that the weekday p.m. peak hour is typically the worst case scenario for the street network in the vicinity of the proposed retail store. Therefore, the remainder of this analysis will focus on the average weekday p.m. peak hour traffic operating conditions, Greenburg Road is the primary roadway providing access to the site. In the vicinity of the site, Greenburg Road is designated as a Major Collector in the Tigard Comprehensive Transportation Plan, and has two southbound lanes and a single northbound lade. The posted speed on Greenburg Road is 40 miles per hour. Washington Square has two access locations along Greenburg Road in the vicinity of the site. Access Road Number 4, which provides the southern boundary of Parcel 2, is a full - access driveway with a raised median extending the entire length of the inlet throat, North Cemetery Road provides full - access to the shopping center and is located approximately 350 feet south of Access Road Number 4. These two access points along Greenburg Road are both stop sign controlled and have exclusive left and right turn lanes. Traffic flow on Greenburg Road is controlled by fully - actuated signals at the intersections of Hall Boulevard to the north and Washington Square Road /Lincoln Center south of the pi oposed site. Attached Figure 1 shows the proposed site location and surrounding st,:eet network and lane configurations. Existing Traffic Volumes and Peak Hour Operations Existing p.m. peak hour traffic volumes were taken from the Hall /Greenburg /Scholls Study which was completed. in October of this year (1993). These volumes are shown in Figure 1. The volumes indicated on Figure 1 have all been rounded to the nearest five vehicles per hour, A Level of Service (LOS) analysis was conducted in the Hall /Greenburg /Scholls study and confirmed in this analysis. The LOS results for the intersections within the study area are shown in Table 1 and have been prepared in accordance to the procedures presented in the 1985 Highway Ca parity Manual (published by the Transportation Research Board). A description of the LOS and the criteria by which it is determined is available upon request. Mr, Randy Kyte November 19, 1993 Page 3 Table 1 - Existing PM Peak Hour Level of Service Signalized Controlled Unsignalized Intersection Reserve Delay V/C LOS Capacity LOS Hall Blvd, /Greenburg Rd, 32.9 0.90 D Access #4 /Greenburg Rd. 198 C / D North Cemetery Access/ 187 D Greenburg Road As shown in Table 1, all the intersections within the study area operate within acceptable levels of service, The two unsignalized access driveways on Greenburg Road operate well above the minimum acceptable LOS "E" for unsignalized intersections, as shown by the reserve capacities being near 200 vehicles per hour, The signalized intersection of Hall Boulevard and Greenburg Road operates at an acceptable LOS "D" and has sufficient capacity to handle higher volumes of traffic. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS' The methodology used in determining the overall net impact of developing a 25,000 square foot retail store at Washington Square utilized conservatively high estimates for site - generated trips, thus representing a reasonable worst case scenario, The following conservative assumptions were used in the analysis: • The estimated store opening was assumed to be in early 1995. • A three percent global growth rate was assumed to account for additional traffic growth in the vicinity of the site. • All new site generated trips were routed through the Greenburg Road access driveways only. Trip Distribution and Generation The proposed retail store will be assumed to provide .space for a typical shopping center pad tenant. Estimates of weekday p.m, peak hour vehicle trips ends for the proposed retail store were developed from empirical observations at other similar retail pad developments. These observations are summarized in a standard reference manual, Trip Generation 5th Edition, e�• Mr. Randy Kyte November 19, 1993 Page 4 published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (1991). The site generated traffic from a retail development are divided into four basic types of trips: 1. Drop -in Trips— These trips currently exist on the roadways that provide primary access to the center, and are being made for some purpose other than visiting the facility (for example, work-to-home), Drop -in trips do not result in any increase in ba 'kground traffic volumes within the study area. In fact, the only r impact of these drop -in trips occurs at the site driveways, where they become turning movements. Therefore, drop -in trips have no additional effect on the road system beyond the development's driveways. 2. Internal Trips- These trips are currently being generated at the center where; the proposed facility will be developed. Therefore, trips are combined into one joint trip to i he center (two or more facilities on site will draw the same driver), Internal trips will result only in additional on -site traffic, and will have a minimal effect on the surrounding transportation system. The only effect internal trips have on the surrounding system is the possibility of accessing the center differently to reach each facility on the site. 3, Diverted. Trips ---- These trips are currently being drawn to other commercial activities that compete with the proposed facility, but are redirected to the new facility when it opens. This redirection usually occurs because of an improvement in convenience and proximity for the affected drivers, Diverted trips will result in an increase in traffic volumes within the immediate vicinity of the site, but will also result in a decrease in traffic volumes at other locations within the area (i.e,, in areas where they used to shop). Therefore, this component of the total generated demand causes no change in. the total number of vehicle trios within the area even though it may add to the number of trips within the immediate vicinity of the site. Another side benefit is that by diverting, these trips often cause a ne,, reduction in total vehicle miles traveled on the areas transportation system. This is a eommon sense observation, since it is difficult to imagine that many drivers would divert to a new restaurant in order to travel a greater distance than they did previously. 4. New Trips— These retail trips would not have been made without the existence of the proposed facility. Therefore, this is the only trip type that results in a net increase in the total number of trips made within the area. These are also the only trips that represent additional vehicle miles of travel on the transportation system. Past studies of local serving retail facilities have found as few as one quarter of p.m, peak hour trips were new traffic on the roadway network. 4 Mr. Randy Kyte November 19, 1993 Page 5 Typically, outlying retail tenant pads at large shopping centers contain specialty items that are generally not attainable inside the conventional shopping center format. For the purpose of this analysis, a conservative assumption of 5 percent drop -in trips and 25 percent internal trips was used. The low proportion of drop -in trips to internal trips was used because of the position of the site relative to the rest of the Washington Square complex and the surrounding transportation system (ie. Highway 217 exits, Scholls Ferry Road, and Hall Boulevard), Diverted trips in the area were accounted for in the analysis; however, they were added to the total new site generated trips to assure a conservative approach on how the transportation . system in the vicinity of the site would be affected. Table 2 shows the estimated weekday p.m. peak hour trip generation characteristics for the proposed retail store. Table 2 - Trip Generation Weekday PM Peak Hour Trips ITE Daily Total Inbound Outbound Size Land Use (sqft) uu Trips Retail Store 25,000 820 920 Drop -in Trips (5%) 45 Internal Trips (25 %) 230 Net New Trips' 645 Includes New and Diverted trips, As shown in Table 2, the proposed retail store will generate approximately 920 trips on an average weekday, of which 90 will be in the pm, peak hour, Of the 920 daily trips, approximately 645 are considered new and diverted trips, of which opproxhnately 65 occur during the p.m, peak hour. The directional split between the inbound and outbound trips was assumed to be balanced (50% inbound and 50% outbound), The trip generation impact of the proposed development is minimal at best when compared to the existing traffic generated by Washington Square. Currently, the shopping center generates a total of 3,900 trips during the weekday p.rn, peak hour throughout the entire complex, and 450 trips through Access Road Number 4 and the North Cemetery Road, The overall increase for the Washington Square complex was calculated to be 1,7 percent, and 13.5 for the two accesses on Greenburg Road. ITE Daily Size Land Use (sqft) uu Trips Retail Store 25,000 820 920 Drop -in Trips (5%) 45 Internal Trips (25 %) 230 Net New Trips' 645 Includes New and Diverted trips, As shown in Table 2, the proposed retail store will generate approximately 920 trips on an average weekday, of which 90 will be in the pm, peak hour, Of the 920 daily trips, approximately 645 are considered new and diverted trips, of which opproxhnately 65 occur during the p.m, peak hour. The directional split between the inbound and outbound trips was assumed to be balanced (50% inbound and 50% outbound), The trip generation impact of the proposed development is minimal at best when compared to the existing traffic generated by Washington Square. Currently, the shopping center generates a total of 3,900 trips during the weekday p.rn, peak hour throughout the entire complex, and 450 trips through Access Road Number 4 and the North Cemetery Road, The overall increase for the Washington Square complex was calculated to be 1,7 percent, and 13.5 for the two accesses on Greenburg Road. Mr. Randy Kyte November 19, 1993 Page 6 Total Traffic and Peak hour Operation with Site Developed The 1995 background traffic volumes, estimated by increasing the existing volumes by a global three percent growth factor, were added to the site generated traffic to arrive at the 1995 total weekday p.m. peak hour traffic volumes as shown in Figure 1. Table 3 shows the Level of Service at the new driveway access, the two existing accesses, and at the intersection of Hall Boulevard and Greenburg Road with the site fully developed. Table 3. - PM Peak Hour Level of Service with Site Developed Signalized Controlled Unsignalized Intersection Reserve Delay V/C LOS Capacity LOS Hall Blvd, /Greenburg Rd, 34.9 0.94 D Greenburg Rd. Site Access 266 C Access: #4 /Greenburg Rd. 163 D North Cemetery Access/ 161 D Greenburg Road As shown in Table 3, the unsignalized intersections within the study area all will operate within an acceptable LOS ►'D'►. The signalized intersection of Hall Boulevard and Greenburg Road will operate at an acceptable LOS "D" and shows only a slight increase in average vehicle delay from the existing conditions. Site Access and Circulation Issues The proposed retail store site plan was analyzed for potential access or internal site circulation deficiencies. The new full- access site driveway, proposed to be located approximately 325 feet north of the existing Access Road Number 4, was examined for sufficient sight distance. While there are minor changes in grade in front of the proposed site access on Greenburg Road, field observations indicated that there is sufficient sight distance for drivers. In order to ensure sufficient sight di,tance, landscaping along Greenburg Road should be maintained at levels below 3.5 feet within the exiting vehicle sight triangles. Mr. Randy Kyle November 19, 1993 Page 7 An examination was conducted of the internal Washington Square circulation system and its relationship to the proposed site. Accordingly, the site should be provided with easy internal access from Washington Square, in order to reduce the number of vehicles required to return to the external street network to enter the site. The two following mitigation scenarios would provide adequate internal site circulation between facilities at Washington Square: 1) The existing raised median on Access Road Number 4 should either be removed west of the proposed site access (approximately 190 feet west on Greenburg Road) or be interrupted at the site access to allow drivers to turn left into the site while driving east on the access road, 2) A cha nelized driveway should be provided through the east parking lot into the proposed site just east of the vacated Firestone Building, The mitigations listed above will provide good circulation between the facilities at Washington Square and the proposed retail development, and reduce the amount of traffic required to use the surrounding transportation network, It should be noted that the site access connecting to Access Road Number 4 must provide sufficient throat distance from Greenburg Road. It is recommended that 150 feet of uninterrupted throat depth is maintained on the site access. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the results of the traffic analysis described in this letter, the proposed 25,000 square foot retail store can be developed while still maintaining acceptable levels of traffic operation and safety on the surrounding transportation system. The following conclusions can be drawn from the analysis: The proposed development is expected to generate 645 trips on a daily basis, with 65 new trips be generated during the p,m, peak hour, This increase in trips to the Washington Square complex will account for a 1.7 percent net increase in trips within the study area. The new full - access site driveway on Grecnburg Road will operate at an acceptable Level of Service "C". This access should provide adequate sight distance through the use of low lying landscape along the roadway frontage. q- Mr, Randy Kyle November 19, 1993 Page 8 To ensure continued safe and efficient traffic operations in the vicinity of the site, the following improvements are recommended: • The location of the access driveway on Access Road Number 4 should be locateci no closer than 150 feet from Greenburg Road. • The proposed site needs to provide additional access through the east parking lot of Washington Square and /or provide a break in the existing raised median on Access Road Number 4 for internal site circulation. I trust this letter adequately addresses the transportation related issues associated with the development of this site. If there are any additional questions or concerns you have regarding this analysis, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Dan Seeman Associate Marc Butorac Transportation Analyst Attachment : :Figure 1 y Traffic Characteristic •. • NORTH (NOT TO SCALE) RUDENSTEINS ACCESS WASHINGTON RD, #4 SQUARE LEJ I sir I N. CEMETARY SITE VICINITY MAP AND EXISTING LANE CONFIGURATIONS RUBENSTEINS IS hssilLna _lit; it cr Aeg (10,4 (4,5)50.—p. 100(95) PIIMMIIM•00100/01. 1..........••••••■••••■••■■•.1,0 N. CENICTARY RD. ot,_ CEMETARY/ LEGEND 00 tO 0 XXX EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES (XXX) - TOTAL TRAFFIC WITH RETAIL STORE WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VO„UMES oessentemossomnrommairuanornmenormoommeweelmoupv TRAFFIC CHA P.4 C TERIS TICS IMINIMMINIMMiniriniiiragieliliiim0191110essidirilard1 25,000 SQ. FT, RETAIL STORE WASHINGTON SOLIARC. TWO TIGARD OR FIGURE . I. .. , . _ NOVEMBER 1993 1111‘.1111IMMMIK.111 RZA AGRA, Inc. (Formerly: Rittenhouse -Z» Stan & Associates, Inc.) Engineering & Environtnental Services December 10, 1993 Winmar Company, Inc. 700 Fifth Avenue Suite 2600 Gateway Tower Seattle, Washington 98104 -5026 Attr., Randy Kyte SUBJECT: GEOTECHNICAL SITE SUITABILITY PROPOSED RETAIL FACILITY ADJACENT TO WASHINGTON SQUARE TIGAF1D, OREGON Dear Randy; RXHil 1a 7477 SW Tech Center Drive Portland, Oregon 97223 -8024 (503) 639 -3400 FAX (503) 620 -7892 21 -5723 At your request, we have evaluated previous soils explorations made in the vicinity of the proposed project. These explorations were made by Shannon and Wilson for the original mall development and by ourselves for numerous later projects, The soils in the vicinity consist of native silty clays overlying basalt bedrock, The site is located east of the existing J.C. Penney store and west of Greenburg road. The project, as we understand it, is to consist of a single story, slab -on- grade, 25,200 square foot retail fat;ility. Based on our understanding of the project and our review of soil conditions, we feel that a final design based on the soils conditions present is feasible, As such, we feel that the site is geotechnicaly suitable for the proposed development. We hope that this letter meets your needs on this project and we look forward to future involvement, If you require further information, please call, Respectfully Submitted, RZA AGRA, INC. Stuart Albright, P.E... Associate Geotochnical Engineer 441.9 1�p ;Am. G,•' r �V j a ut J4+ V'. 1141V11.44 1.I 1 '40.4,. ..,, It/ .y , .; ra +'t / JJ" V i�r lnavN4�'a'� L.,...,...t. NMI4iMMW[ ►"I+st.a.„i tt.acvs,sYwir4s... 9...._:.L. j AGRA Earth & Envrror ',ental Group BEQUEST FOR COMMENTS FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 93-0023 MACKENZIE/PACIFIC REALTY LOCATION: Pacific Corporate Center, lots 7 and 8, west of Interstate 5, south of SW Cardin'll Lane, and east of SW Sequoia Parkway (WCTM 2S1 12DA, tax lots 200 and 300). A request for the following development applications: 1) Site Development Review approval to allow construction of two buildings of 25,000 and 28,000 square feet in size for an office supply wholesale/retail outlet and computer products company. 2) Lot line adjustment to adjust two parcels of approximately 4.7 acres and 3.4 acres into two parcels of 5.6 acres and 2.5 acres. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150, 18.162, and 18.164. ZONE: I-P (Industrial Park) The I-P zoning designation allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business cupport services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by aaft. 3, 1994. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. Ityns.Qx:eunal.,..)Letpsjyathe above date please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: Number: ..trrs0-1,—›SI RNUEST FOR COMMENTS 0/10 V.VO_ DATE: December 23 1993 /) FROM Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 93-0025 W & H PACIFIC/WASHINGTON SQUARE LOCATION: 9835 SW Greenburg Road (WCTM 1S1 26C, tax lots 300, 402, and a portion of 500). A request for Site Development Review for a 25,000 square foot retail building on a 2.38 acre site in the Washington Square Shopping Center. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.42, 18.62, 18.100, 18.106, 18.114, and 18.120. ZONE: C-G (General Commercial) The C-G zone provides development sites for major retail goods and services. RECEIVED PLANNING ,JAN 1 1 1994 Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Jan. 3, 1994. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date,, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm, your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: of our office. (LLISILLL *Ig Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number:. 1,?(:2L22-221f k EEQuEsT_EoR COMMENTS TO: (orvio a ( . DATE: December 23 1993 — FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 93-0025 W & H PACIFIC WASHINGTON SQUARE LOCATION: 9835 SW Greenburg Road (WCTM 1S1 26C, tax lots 30f), 402, and a portion of 500). A request for Site Development Rcview for a 25,000 square foot retail building on a 2.38 acre site in the Washington Square Shopping Center. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.42, 18.62, 18.100, 18.106, 18.114, and 18.120. ZONE: C-G (General Commercial) The C-G zone provides development oites for major retail goods and services. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your reviow. From information supolied by varioils departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Jan. 3, 1994. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to mmgdby the above date,, please phor,e the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 63') 4171. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: 1.•••••••••**11 We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: of our office. ••i••••• Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: RECEIVED PLANNING JAN 0 3 194 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO: tk A- W6114,1 I>51, DATE: December, 23, 1993 . -- FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 93-0025 W & H PACIFIC/WASHINGTON SQUARE LOCATION: 9835 SW Greenburg Road (WCTM 1S1 26C, tax lots 300, 402, and a portion of 500). A request for Site Development Review for a 25,000 square foot retail building on a 2.38 acre site in the Washington Square Shopping Center. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.42, 18.62, /8.100, 18.106, 18.114, and 18.120. ZONE: C-0 (General Commercial) The C-G zone provides development sites for major retail goods and services. • .■; • *.**,'": Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendatim will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the n b S. f you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments b Jan. 3, 1994 You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to rara.21,775Er comments. Itmg_are_unable to respond bly...theApove date please phone the staff contact rioted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions .egarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments , avol,# '4- -a o•-tt'3 , 1,..o to ... -IL- e er t • - 1 r ' '?*-1..,•-' 72...e,„ oy-q...e.,4,1 6c..0- —_,ZY Vo 41 itia-X'P-t' ' ?.41 4-1 ' Ad:'c'- A., P.-- 4 Name 0 Person ComMenting: ,7:57ra!=2LLL:5 Phone Number: 4g2a_,„_42L____ _ " REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 7.2,gaaLL .\)1 te:k, DATE: December 23 1993 ( FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 93-0025 W & H PACIFIC WASHINGTON SQUARE LOCAT:ON: 9835 SW Greenburg Road (WCTM 151 26C, tax lots 300, 402, and a port"on of 500). A request for Site Development Review for a 25,000 square foot retail building on a 2.38 acre site in the Washington Square Shopping Center. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.42, 18.62, 18.100, 18.106, 18.114, and 18.120. ZONE: C-G (General Commercial) The C-C zone provides development sites for major retail goods and services. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a dc4ision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Jan. 3, 1994. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unabl2_1:2122ngiths212pve date4 please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and Jonfirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts PLEASE CHECX THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: 1r 1,4-- 11, Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: MOM RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 93-0025 W & H PACIFILWASHINGTON SQUARE LOCATION: 9835 SW Greenburg Road (WCTM 181 26C, tax lots 300, 402, and a portion of 500). A request for Site Development Review for a 25,000 square foot retail building on a 2.38 acre site in the Washington Square Shopping Center. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.42, 18.62, 18.100, 18.106, 18.114, and 18.120. ZONE: C-G (General Commercial) The C-G zone provides development sites for major retail goods and services. • Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From .10 information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Jan. 3, 1994. You may . use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond_hy the above date please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as „ possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT Mark Roberts CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEM 8 THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it .; 0:: our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: r�Y 01/04/94 12:50 `$`503 239 6469 TRIMET 'TB INFO 444 CITY OF TIGARD IJ002 /003 TRI- COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT OF OREGON 4012 S,E, 17TH AVENUE PORTLAND, OREGON 97202 January 4, 1994 Mark Roberts Tigard r ,ping Department 13125 a,r.1 Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Subject: Washington Square SDI( 93 -0025 Dear Mark, Tri-Met appreciates this opportunity to respond to the Washington Square proposal at 9835 Greenburg Road. Transit service is accessible along Greenburg Road. As part of the Transportation Planning Rule Goal 12 process, Tri -Met has been working closely with a group of developers, architects, local planners and special interest groups. This group is developing a series of standards which have been tested by "real" projects and are considered to be reasonable in terms of achieving a better pedestrian orientation through market supportable developments. The following comments reflect Tri -Mat's participation in the Goal 12 working group and are intended to assure safe and convenient pedestrian access to and within this site o Provide perimeter sidewalks along Greenberg Road and Access Road No. 4 with access points through any perimeter landscaping at appropriate intervals. These sidewalks should be straight as opposed to meandering to provide the most direct pedestrian circulation by the site. o Provide a minimum 3 foot landscaping buffer between the perimeter sidew ;ks and auto traffic along Greenburg Road. This buffer enhances pedestrian circulation along the st eiet. Thank you for considering Tri -Met's comments. Please call me at 2385859 if you have any questions, or comments. Sincerely, Xirn .rly Knox, Project Coordinator REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: December 23 1993 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 93-0025 W & H pACIELQ/WASHINGTON SQUARE LOCATION: 9835 SW Greenburg Road (WCTM 1S1 26C, tax lots 300, 402, and a portion of 500). A request for Site Development Rev3'w for a 25,000 square foot retail building on a 2.38 acre site in the rx:-.1Ington Square Shopping Center. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.42, 18.62, 18.100, 18.106, 18.114, and 18.120. ZONE: C-G (General Commercial) The C-0 zone provides development sites for major retail goods and services. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared ..,1"': and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish ....:, : ... . .-:'.'...: •1 .... , ..,;.,: *,. ..' • • ....P. . , , ,qt: ■ mejlaorabove datg, l,, /„. phone the staff contact noted below with yovr comments and confirm your co — 4nts in writing as soon as to comment on this application, we need your comments by Jan. 3, 1994. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate 3et v to return your comments. If you are unable to p possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 PHONE: 639-4171 p STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts , . PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING J.MMS THAT APPLY: . .1— attbt.52 _.,..._ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. : Please contact a *. * of our office Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments 11 'sAk —timuiCt'N' 11.1___ILL': wi4w44404.4*.444.4.. l•-i ank - tia .■.444-. ...tm....*.n.........................r. t'T . f _ . 1, Q , ... ).. ------------- , , ie.e• ( V , Phone Number: ‘A.?211.1111. O b /14/94 18:20 X5037318259 Poet-It" brand �l Fax Transmittal Memo 7i) ODOT REGION 1 2001/002 001/002 Company 9 -wept No, of Pages From Company Location .� Fax # Original Disposition: Dept, Charge p V 0Deotoy ❑ Return Cali for pickup MEMORANDUM Date: January 14, 1994 To: Mark Roberts, city of Tigard From; Laurie Nicholson, ODOT Subject: Washington Square Expansion 25,000 sf Retail Parcel 2 DEPARTNIEN1 OF TRANSPORTATION Region I FILE CODE: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Washington Square Expansion, The intersection of Hall Boulevard and Greenburg Road is an ODOT facility. This agency reviews proposed development that will impact state highway facilities and presents comments outlining possible measures to mitigate negative impacts on ODOT roads. 000T staff reviewed Kittleson & Associates' traffic study and found that the traffic study adequately covers traffic volumes from the location of the proposed development as well as traffic flows into the local street network;however, the study did not address the full outcomes of allowing complete access onto Greenburg Road at the Hale Eloulevard /Greonburg road signal. Other concerns that were not addressed in the traffic study include: • • • • . • • 4 • 734-1850 (12.92) ../ • , • ' • • • • 1.) The distance he access to Hall Boulevard was r specifie,d, L. 2.) The que length and other effects on the signal were not incorporated. 3,) The report assumes that all site generated traffic goes through the Hall/Greenb intersection-movements are distributed away from the site instead of towards it, ••••••••••••••••••■••■•••111•46011•1•1•••••••........* 9002 SE Md.oughliz Miiwatikie, OR 97222 (503) 653-3090 MX (503) 653-3267 • 0 01/14/94 16:30 e6037318259 ODOT - REGION 1 These comments repres have any questions, fe ent ODOTs response to the land use action. If you free to call me at 731-8281. Laurie Nicholson, Region 1 Planning Assistant ct.-; Dorothy Upton-Traffic Operations Manager E3ob Doran-District 2A Assistant District Manager (2002/002 ft Washington County jj Department of Land Ust: .d Transportation (FAX :693- 4412) Land Development Services 155 N First Ave, Suite 350 Hillsboro, OR 97124 Tigard Planning Department P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 RE: SDR 93 -0025 - W & H PACIFIC /WASHINGTON COUNTY RECEIVED PLANNING JAN 21 1994 January 20, 1994 Washington County has reviewed this development application and submits the following comments and required conditions for access to SW Greenburg Road, a County Minor Arterial: COMMENTS 1, The minimum access spacing standard for SW Greenburg Road is 600 feet, measured between access points on each side of the road as required by Resolution and Order 86 -95 and Section 501 -8.5.B of the Community Development Code. Access to SW Greenburg Road must therefore be restricted to meet this spacing standard. The roposed access location does not meet this standard. No access is permitted to SW Greenburg Road. All access to the site must be via the existing private road along the south property line (Access Road No. 4). 2. A traffic analysis for this development proposal is being performed by the County Traffic Analyst, whose findings and recommendations will be forwarded to the City at the time of completion of the review. This review and the recommended conditions of approval which will be developed as a part of that review are required by Resolution and Order 86 -95 and Section 501 - 8.2.8. of the Community Development Code. 3. This site is within the "Hall /Greenburg /Scholls Study Area ". Other than typical right-of-way dedication, there do not appear to be any additional recommendations in the study for this particular site. REQUIRED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL A. PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL AND ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT: 1. Dedicate additional right-of-way to provide 49 feet from centerline of SW Greenburg Road frontage. 2. Sign a waiver not to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district or other mechanism to improve the base facility of SW Greenburg Road between SW Hall Blvd. to SW Cascade Avenue. 3. Establish a one -foot non - access reserve strip along SW Greenburg Road frontage. The documents needed to complete conditions A.1 through A.3 above shall be oreoa red by the Washington County Survey Division and recorded in the AJasiington County Records Department. County Transportation Review January 20, 1994 Page #2 4. Submit Plans, obtain Engineering Division approval, and obtain a facility permit for construction of tle following public improvements: a. Concrete sidewalk to County standard along SW Greenburg Road frontage. b. Any additional off -site safety improvements found to be required for compliance with R &O 86-95 upon completion of the County Traffic Analyst's review. B. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY: The road improvements required in conjunction with conditions A.4 above shall be completed and acceptea by the County. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Please send a notice of decision and appeal information to the County upon completion of your review. We would also appreciate the opportunity to review a draft of the City's conditions pertaining to access to SW Greenburg Road. If you have any questions, please contact me at 648 - 8761. th /j:transp /whpcfcws.tig TO:TD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: December 23 1993 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 93-0025 W & H PACIFINGTON SQUARE LOCAT:ON: 9835 SW Greenburg Road (WCTM 1S1 26C, tax lots 300, 402, and a portion of 500). A request for Site Development Review for a 25,000 square foot retail building on a 2.38 acre site in the Washington Square Shopping Center. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.42, 18.62, 18.100, 18.106, 18.114, and 18.120. ZONE: C-G (General Commercial) The C-G zone provides development sites for major retail goods and bervices. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future, If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Jan. 3, 1994. You may use the space provided below o); attach a separate letter to return your comments. If vou,are unable to respond, by the above date,, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it Please contact Please It'efer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: \t'%42,,iirLNi 'SO NW., ' .1) 1,i 9- N \ otrtrot — '41 \ of our office. Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: 3 cc; 0 (I) lb Nto to CD N l•-•• ▪ U z (.) 0 0 0 < (10 INDEX TO SHEETS 1 OF 5 2 OF 5 3 OF 5 4 ! OF 5 5 OF 5 OWNER SITE PLAN / COVER SHEET GRADING & UTILITY PLAN FLOOR PLAN ELEVATIONS LANDSCAPE PLAN WINMER COMPANY, INC. (WASHINGTON SQAURE, INC.) , 700 5TH AVENUE, SUITE 2600 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104-5026 PHONE: (206) 223-4500 CONTACT: RANDY KYTE, VICE PRESIDENT ENGINEER, PLANNER, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, SURVEYOR W&H PACIFIC, INC, P.O. BOX 80040 PORTLAND, OREGON 97280 PHONE: 503-626-0455 FAX: 503-526-0775 CONTACT: JIMMY BELLOMY, A.S. L.A. PROJECT PLANNER ARCHITECT BENNER STANGE ASSOCIATES 10 NW 10TH AVENUE SUITE 300 PORTLAND, OREGON 97209 PHONE: (503) 228-0666 FAX: (503) 228-3821 CONTACT: ROGER STANGE, A.I.A. I be 101 I iIMMIIINOMMOOM RUBENSTEIN'S FURNITURE OM IMO ■••■•■■,........ 1MS 1.11.111 = 10' (TYP) LEGAL DESCRIPTION ...11.11.11.011..111111.1.11.11.1.11.101....1111111... .M1M1M1*M1g*M1M1T*M1,M1M1a,■M1M1M1M1M11111M11 TAX LOTS 300, 400 & 500 TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, SECTION 2., W.M. (1S1 26C) SITE DATA SITE SIZE ZONING MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE PROPOSED SITE COVERAGE MINIMUM REQUIRED LANDSCAPE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE REQUIRED PARKING SPACES PROPOSED PARKING SPACES (TOTAL) PARKING RATIO HANDICAPPED SPACES BUILDING GROSS FLOOR AREA NOTES `M1M1M1M1M11M1M1M1,1M1M1M1■M1,M1M1M1,M1M1.■, ,M1111,M1M1M1M11M1M1M11111M1*. 2.38 AC, C-G 85% 76% 15% 24% 63 125 4.48/1000 S. F, 2 25,000 S.F. t M1 MI NY 4441111441MMIIIN C OF R.O.W GREENBURG ROAD 1.111.1111118.111111 MIR NM 11.....1.1111.1111 AIM MINI LINE OF PROPOSED R.0. W 11113....M...1 OW MN 24' Mo.04144.4.441 NM MI 11 .., casualwasinamemmovanairommaememasimminummo**.amek vistuNguamilwentmemoranummuma 240'7-.0" ' RETAIL CENTER 25,000 S.F. R. I0.NPAY 13EA . " Pop. 36, —LET CRESTWOOD (=STEAD LN 5bk) q. 'ROW.11" Progress Gou coon LESLIE 441 Iradley ..orner BOMA CT CEDARCRsTEST TA BIRCH CEDARCR PROJECT SITE BORDERS M.P. 9.11 2 PARK KNGLEIMOD PARK IRONWOOD THORN ST. COTTONWOOD LN A st, LI ST. 12' 0 111•11 ▪ li•IMIONIIIi11.0 OM ow 11.11.7111111•MI EXISTING PARKING LOT. = •5' (TYP) 30' Imo Iwo mormramomma., ism me maymm...... 4 C 18' 12.5' NEW QRIVEWAY ACCESS U n ACCESS • M1 , p)ERIgNTGINLGOT Ii .1i 1; IF THIS DOCUMENT 13 LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. JIffrlrjlFlJl ' L 1 11111111 ;IT 114111111111111114111;iiiiiiiiiiA 111111111 II liii I11114 111111111 111111111 1111111 1 1111 I 9!I I 9 111111111111111111 .1111111111 I I C 111111111 1110 *111111111 Armssontal4Im 1111T11111111bt111111n; 11111111)1 I 111111111 6 111111111 9 111111111 14 111111111 )1111111'11 VMS LONGSTAFF NORTH NORTH DAKOTA v\ VICINITY MAP N. T. S. LEGEND o ST. SURFACE VAULT MANHOLE, 'TYPE NOTED SEWER CLEANOUT CATCH BASIN WATER METER FIRE HYDRANT SIGN pos WATER VALVE POWER POLE STREET LIGHT TRAFFIC CONTROLLER PLANTER EXISTING BUILDING LINE PROPOSED BUILDING LINE TRUCK LOADING ZONE R REFUSE (PECYCLABLES) AREA SCALE: 1"=30' * 15 30 Ramolmereomm istrionorarary 60 N 0 R7-I • 't RcPcgtrn ni AR141worm 1.) (3 1993 PLANNING —0— SURVEYING —0— ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 8405 S.W. NIMBUS AVENUE P.O. BOX 80040 PORTLAND, OREGON 07280 (503) 828-0465 Fax: (603) 526-0775 Revisions: BENNER STANGE ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, P.C. 10 N.W. TENTH AVENUE SUITE 300 PORTLAND, OR 97209 (503) 228.0666 FAX (503) 228•3821 Sheet Number L21c X, T X S, R X E, WM 1711111111 No.38 e 11111111111il HUM aptottbp,i 6271-4 IC?(/C1 00 CO CO CO CO 00 V) r- N) J PEN WTS. 1 ,111., Mr ....•.wr..s.11. .1111.1 1.41 s•11111•..11r■a MON NNW N...w..11,oIIN.11.. A11. M.. .11■11•11.o{.MNIMr N OF R.O4 GREENBUR ROAD LINE OF PROPOSED R.O. W DOMESTIC W; TER SERVICE ^,,'V D,D,C. VAULT W/ F,D.C. 1% 411--- FIRE SERVICE L4ti CO CB 237.6 F.F. 239.5 RETAIL CENTER 25,000 S.F. 1- / ' i 1% STM Aip CO e),-,-„),c, _1111. ix R ' A/7K WNW IMMO SG WEN WIWI 1.11 111.0. WWI o 0° av (O co IN cO N w 0� 00 --a 0 0 a. U MOW RIM WWI Wan EXISTING EAST PARKING LOT IV THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NO`T'ATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT 1 0 _ -1111 x..� ._ - I 11111111114 I I 1 1 �11 � `f �1 � �1�11�i � �1�� t�-r ��i t I i�I 11 � I I 1 111 � I I� � I I I � I I I l� 1111 �.�.z :. ..�... �. r iI I I 1 1 1 r I r 1 II I1 (I I r r I c 1 111 III 1c1 Tr rp ri 71 I l i -t1 t �- I I I I I I j I I 17 f�-� I i 1 I C I j i r _. No.ad 2 1 1 l I ,IIaU IIII IIII11a 1;I UIIl 1 III I8 UIItI I h I I�It l�fl t II t l � �111 1� 1 N 11'1� 1 11 � II `t II �I� II�II �V� II I1III1III{{ I 1 111{, 1 1. llf 111111111111 Qlllil,l � f11111111 1111111 X aI SCALE 1 "40' 10 20 LEGEND 40 SURFACE VAULT MANHOLE, TYPE NOTED SEWER CLEANOUT X1;1:1:11 CATCH BASIN 1,E1' WATER METER : FIRE HYDRANT SIGN POST .,.! WATER VALVE POWER POLE STREET LIGHT TRAFFIC CONTROLLER PLANTER EXISTING BUILDING LINE PROPOSED BUILDING LINE 0 PROPOSED CATCH BASIN (2( PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED MANHOLE SPOT ELEVATION 1 I o o CLEAN OUT STM -- PROPOSED STORM LINE -- 4 "W ---- -- PROPOSED WATER LINE NORTH TRUCK LOADING ZONE EXISTING CONTOUR 5eptPintibbi X74, 1999 BENNER STANGE ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, P.C. 10 NW. TENTH AVENUE SUITE 300 I'ORTLA 5030i 228^0556 FAX (503) 2`R 3821 PLANNING SURVEYING ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 8405 S.W. NIMBUS AVENUE R.O. BOX 80040 PORTLAND, OREGON 97280 (503) Fax; (50 23)526 -0775 oG lasw Imams g( at C4 >am kas 144 241 °"'R ()Ei (04)1 Ca) C) "14 Vease Z"4±1.14 kon Plot Date: _ 12/10/93 Design: JRC Drawn: _MIL_ Checked: Sheet Number 2 OF 5 SEC X, T X S, R X E, WM 1111.....■• '2 ,b `( C? IF THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. 0 I I I 11 1-1-17i:1111-1-1T11 1 Igtlif 11171 -11-11 LAMDBCArR DM., LEAP CHAINLINK PROVIDE NECU66ARt' !RACING I UR EELP N EAC44 GATE FOR STAFILITY. TRASH ENCLOSURE t/4"4-0" SITE DATA SITE AREA RETAIL TRASH ENCLOSURE SECTION '2 " =1' -O" (2.38 ACRES) PARKING PROVIDED HANDICAPPED PROVIDED TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED PARKING RA'T'IO SITE COVERAGE (INCLUDES : BUILDING AND IMPERVIOUS AREAS) 103,719 S.E. 25,000 S.E. 123 SPACES 2 SPACES 125 SPACES 5.0 SPACES / 1,000 S.E. 84.76 X LANDSCAPE COVERAGE : 15.24 7 RUISENSTE (N `S FURNITURE BICYCLE RACK 24' 4 t GREENBURG ROAD 01111.11MMISIsp....0 MO IMO VINISM011Mrsappowa WINO NM 4•1111. OMMINNUNKSVMSSINO TYP. WANDICAP RAMP LINE OF CANOPY ABOVE 9' 2440' -0' RETAIL 25,000 S.F. ..B ..s . ..I. .I.. 30' ACCESS TO EXISTING PARKING LOT SITE PLAN .= 30' -0i TRASP AND RECYCLING FINISH ITYP.J —ENCLOSURES (TYF'.) 04 2 Is' cn ----BICYCLE RACK CONC. PLAZA u1/ MED. BROOM 4."477,1 3i' -0" I... ... ...Yr.... I.Y. ... ..YYw......... woo ..o ....I.I....I. ... ..I. .�.r.00 0.r ..e eammo/...... NM* ILLIIMSNIMM.SMOIMO ONO 011119 EAST PARKING LOT "11 OMOMMINVOMIIMM. 0011Y MOO MIIMMINONIIIIIMIM .1,1•0 OM* amommirmemon. me* .1 i.O• "4' C' 0 0 cc co w U U II PROJECT NO. 93185 DRAWN BY : KMG CHECKED BY : DATE: 12- Zia -93 REVISION : W (1) Q� 1.—A 8 0 () CC o° WZz CC < Q 3 Cia" :73 20 O 6 w ec Z 0 0 0 lc-Es coD Q �> BENNER STANGE ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, P.C. 10 N.W. TENTH AVENUE SUITE 300 PORTLAND, OR 97209 (503) 228 0666 FAX (503) 2283821 FLOOR PLAN DESIGN REVIEW : e C) LChi °3° o' ck METAL ROOF SYNTHETIC PLASTER METAL AWNING EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" = 1' -0" SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" = 1' -0" 4' WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" = 1' -0" SYNTHETIC PLASTER REVEALS MASONRY WALLS AND COLUMNS ALUMINUM STORE FRONT MASONRY ACCENTS MASONRY WALL STEEL EXIT DOORS IF THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT 11ri11T�_1.1.(.1 �_1i(1111r1i.(1,,�i1'1 iJIIIIII!I11111IIII�IIII IIII IIII111111iilII1111 1111 NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" = 1' -0" 11'1i1i11- 41- 1-ri°r1111I `11 C 1r��Iili(11111!111li ;ii 111 0 11 IIIIIIIIIw� IIilllllll iII1111i1i1111.11r1 1111911 1111 20' -0" 0.0' A 1 I I 1 I!I rA1rlr r11 1111 1 T ITTLIc11 111 111 r111�1Ii 111 III 1 i 1 Ti No.36 X T � 8 , �, i 0�101111.10 IIIIIIII�IIII�IIIIIIIII�IIII llll�llll IIII�IIII IIIIINII IIII�IIII�IIII�IIIIIIIII� 6 > G IIIIIIII�IIII IIII�IIIIIIII� T 9I P1 fiX I�IIIIIIIII� 11111111�11111111I1111 SECTION SCALE: 1/16" = " aptoitkel ichk? BENNER STANCE ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, P.C. 10 N.W. TENTH AVENUE SUITE 300 POFO LAND, OR 97209 (503) 228.0666 FAX (503) 228.3821 ELEV , TION DESIGN REVIEW �� • 4. Iri o° O J CD to CD N N w O U_ Z C.h 00 era 0¢ 00 11101■11111011•10111•11=MI NUM MOW SIMIIMussmamlimaynow OF ROM/ GREENBURG ROAD PROPOSED BIKE RACK Kit, OeOuiO►'te,Fr'� II* t ii sy,wpieop.,••■1104il'*'°1711:1110:4:418P" :..: . --.405 14,14144 tv IF — ►' • 0 °Aim: Nu co CA Pal° __A vitt/ Tr01,1 opt (*I "At" «.sir* =�' irlph To 00010 0 Mow °: wl �"... SDR 93.25 5 OF 19 Atgifiro- 41* Vie 41°M O O 0 O .. b. ,a "iff.""Am'' _Awe artallawford 1.+ 41fkg,.. NOW NOM NM* • -- IF THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. EAST PARKING LOT r ( 111�I7`TIr�I_II 1 iI "jljI1 IIII � I I� 1 RECOMMENDED PLANT MATERIALS: Acer platanoides Licluidarr►ber styraciflua Mains spp. Prunus: serrul:tta "Kwarazate Azalea karume 'Coral Bells' 13erberis thunbergii 'Rose Glow' Juniperus sabina 'Tamarisaifolia' Mithonia. anuifoliuni Rhododenulc,,;1 spp Viburnum davidii Madera helix 'Needlepoint' Lawn l I I l I I I pui'I `r1r i I 0 IIII�IIII IIII�IIii Illyliii !!bill iiiilm !1!1111 I 111111111 111111111 IIIIIIIII �I�� IIIIIIIIII1111111(I Iliililtllllllll IIIIIII 111 Norway Maple American Sweets= Snow INA Crabapple It warm= Flowering Cherry Coral Bells Azalea Rose aglow Barberry Tamarix Juniper Oregon Grape Rhododendron David Viburnum Needlepoint Ivy � �I T 171I1iiIIIIIlIIIIIIfI1i' �L � .� �1 I I i I I I.1 I I 1 i 1 1 �, J �� No.36 I I t t ; 9 L 9 �► i 6 I I T �i�un l t� I f 1IIILIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIUI INI II III � � I�I I it II� I IIIII�IIIIIIIII�IIII IIIIIIIIII ►111111 I II �I I (IIIIIIIIII III I) 111111II1 {IIIIII111 {IIII1IIII 111111I1I rzie Le) 1.44 y;N SCALE: 1 "=20' *b135W1/2 10 20 40 2XDI.OF ROOT BALL TREE WRAP FROM GROUND TO FIRST BRANCH (2) 2X2 S45 DF 8" STAKES DO NOT PENETRATE ROOT BALL WITH STAt ES. DRIVE 3' MIN. TREE TIES REMOVE BURLAP AND TWINE FROM TOP 1/3 OF BALL AFTER STAKING REMOVE ALL TWINE AROUND BASE OF TREE TRUNK TO THE FIRST BRANCH. PLACE ROOT BALL AT TOP OF MULCH LAYER. MULCH CIRCLE WATER BASIN 2" APPROX. DEPTH MIN. 24" DIA. BARK MULCH CIRCLE IN TURF AREAS. --- SOIL MIX BACKFILL AS SPECIFIED. SCARIFY WALLS AND BOTTOM OF PLANTING PIT. TREE PLANTING DETAIL NOR T H �, aU NY9 . NTS BENNER STANCE ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, P.C. 10 N.W. TENTH AVENUE SUITE 300 PORTLAND, OR 97209 (503) 228.0666 FAX (503) 228.3821 PLANNING — *.- SURVEYING — *— ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 8405 S.W, NIMBUS AVENUE B.O. BOX 80040 PORTLAND, OREGON 07280 (503) 828 -0455 Faxt (503) 528 -0775 0 w 0 W F-" Liu "woosi 44t!C imeiNe Latoi W eC44‹ eafttp, 44* teen* (0.1) "44"m vi) Plot Date. 12/10/93 D& ign: MDS Drawn: MCL Checked: Revisions: Sheet Number 50F5 SEC X,TXS,RXE,WM it f4,.tiv. 0, t0, -144 iffs 01. it! . Ot,1 0.341 VW PROPOSED BIKE RACK Kit, OeOuiO►'te,Fr'� II* t ii sy,wpieop.,••■1104il'*'°1711:1110:4:418P" :..: . --.405 14,14144 tv IF — ►' • 0 °Aim: Nu co CA Pal° __A vitt/ Tr01,1 opt (*I "At" «.sir* =�' irlph To 00010 0 Mow °: wl �"... SDR 93.25 5 OF 19 Atgifiro- 41* Vie 41°M O O 0 O .. b. ,a "iff.""Am'' _Awe artallawford 1.+ 41fkg,.. NOW NOM NM* • -- IF THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. EAST PARKING LOT r ( 111�I7`TIr�I_II 1 iI "jljI1 IIII � I I� 1 RECOMMENDED PLANT MATERIALS: Acer platanoides Licluidarr►ber styraciflua Mains spp. Prunus: serrul:tta "Kwarazate Azalea karume 'Coral Bells' 13erberis thunbergii 'Rose Glow' Juniperus sabina 'Tamarisaifolia' Mithonia. anuifoliuni Rhododenulc,,;1 spp Viburnum davidii Madera helix 'Needlepoint' Lawn l I I l I I I pui'I `r1r i I 0 IIII�IIII IIII�IIii Illyliii !!bill iiiilm !1!1111 I 111111111 111111111 IIIIIIIII �I�� IIIIIIIIII1111111(I Iliililtllllllll IIIIIII 111 Norway Maple American Sweets= Snow INA Crabapple It warm= Flowering Cherry Coral Bells Azalea Rose aglow Barberry Tamarix Juniper Oregon Grape Rhododendron David Viburnum Needlepoint Ivy � �I T 171I1iiIIIIIlIIIIIIfI1i' �L � .� �1 I I i I I I.1 I I 1 i 1 1 �, J �� No.36 I I t t ; 9 L 9 �► i 6 I I T �i�un l t� I f 1IIILIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIUI INI II III � � I�I I it II� I IIIII�IIIIIIIII�IIII IIIIIIIIII ►111111 I II �I I (IIIIIIIIII III I) 111111II1 {IIIIII111 {IIII1IIII 111111I1I rzie Le) 1.44 y;N SCALE: 1 "=20' *b135W1/2 10 20 40 2XDI.OF ROOT BALL TREE WRAP FROM GROUND TO FIRST BRANCH (2) 2X2 S45 DF 8" STAKES DO NOT PENETRATE ROOT BALL WITH STAt ES. DRIVE 3' MIN. TREE TIES REMOVE BURLAP AND TWINE FROM TOP 1/3 OF BALL AFTER STAKING REMOVE ALL TWINE AROUND BASE OF TREE TRUNK TO THE FIRST BRANCH. PLACE ROOT BALL AT TOP OF MULCH LAYER. MULCH CIRCLE WATER BASIN 2" APPROX. DEPTH MIN. 24" DIA. BARK MULCH CIRCLE IN TURF AREAS. --- SOIL MIX BACKFILL AS SPECIFIED. SCARIFY WALLS AND BOTTOM OF PLANTING PIT. TREE PLANTING DETAIL NOR T H �, aU NY9 . NTS BENNER STANCE ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, P.C. 10 N.W. TENTH AVENUE SUITE 300 PORTLAND, OR 97209 (503) 228.0666 FAX (503) 228.3821 PLANNING — *.- SURVEYING — *— ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 8405 S.W, NIMBUS AVENUE B.O. BOX 80040 PORTLAND, OREGON 07280 (503) 828 -0455 Faxt (503) 528 -0775 0 w 0 W F-" Liu "woosi 44t!C imeiNe Latoi W eC44‹ eafttp, 44* teen* (0.1) "44"m vi) Plot Date. 12/10/93 D& ign: MDS Drawn: MCL Checked: Revisions: Sheet Number 50F5 SEC X,TXS,RXE,WM it f4,.tiv. 0, t0, -144 iffs . PROPOSED BIKE RACK Kit, OeOuiO►'te,Fr'� II* t ii sy,wpieop.,••■1104il'*'°1711:1110:4:418P" :..: . --.405 14,14144 tv IF — ►' • 0 °Aim: Nu co CA Pal° __A vitt/ Tr01,1 opt (*I "At" «.sir* =�' irlph To 00010 0 Mow °: wl �"... SDR 93.25 5 OF 19 Atgifiro- 41* Vie 41°M O O 0 O .. b. ,a "iff.""Am'' _Awe artallawford 1.+ 41fkg,.. NOW NOM NM* • -- IF THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. EAST PARKING LOT r ( 111�I7`TIr�I_II 1 iI "jljI1 IIII � I I� 1 RECOMMENDED PLANT MATERIALS: Acer platanoides Licluidarr►ber styraciflua Mains spp. Prunus: serrul:tta "Kwarazate Azalea karume 'Coral Bells' 13erberis thunbergii 'Rose Glow' Juniperus sabina 'Tamarisaifolia' Mithonia. anuifoliuni Rhododenulc,,;1 spp Viburnum davidii Madera helix 'Needlepoint' Lawn l I I l I I I pui'I `r1r i I 0 IIII�IIII IIII�IIii Illyliii !!bill iiiilm !1!1111 I 111111111 111111111 IIIIIIIII �I�� IIIIIIIIII1111111(I Iliililtllllllll IIIIIII 111 Norway Maple American Sweets= Snow INA Crabapple It warm= Flowering Cherry Coral Bells Azalea Rose aglow Barberry Tamarix Juniper Oregon Grape Rhododendron David Viburnum Needlepoint Ivy � �I T 171I1iiIIIIIlIIIIIIfI1i' �L � .� �1 I I i I I I.1 I I 1 i 1 1 �, J �� No.36 I I t t ; 9 L 9 �► i 6 I I T �i�un l t� I f 1IIILIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIUI INI II III � � I�I I it II� I IIIII�IIIIIIIII�IIII IIIIIIIIII ►111111 I II �I I (IIIIIIIIII III I) 111111II1 {IIIIII111 {IIII1IIII 111111I1I rzie Le) 1.44 y;N SCALE: 1 "=20' *b135W1/2 10 20 40 2XDI.OF ROOT BALL TREE WRAP FROM GROUND TO FIRST BRANCH (2) 2X2 S45 DF 8" STAKES DO NOT PENETRATE ROOT BALL WITH STAt ES. DRIVE 3' MIN. TREE TIES REMOVE BURLAP AND TWINE FROM TOP 1/3 OF BALL AFTER STAKING REMOVE ALL TWINE AROUND BASE OF TREE TRUNK TO THE FIRST BRANCH. PLACE ROOT BALL AT TOP OF MULCH LAYER. MULCH CIRCLE WATER BASIN 2" APPROX. DEPTH MIN. 24" DIA. BARK MULCH CIRCLE IN TURF AREAS. --- SOIL MIX BACKFILL AS SPECIFIED. SCARIFY WALLS AND BOTTOM OF PLANTING PIT. TREE PLANTING DETAIL NOR T H �, aU NY9 . NTS BENNER STANCE ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, P.C. 10 N.W. TENTH AVENUE SUITE 300 PORTLAND, OR 97209 (503) 228.0666 FAX (503) 228.3821 PLANNING — *.- SURVEYING — *— ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 8405 S.W, NIMBUS AVENUE B.O. BOX 80040 PORTLAND, OREGON 07280 (503) 828 -0455 Faxt (503) 528 -0775 0 w 0 W F-" Liu "woosi 44t!C imeiNe Latoi W eC44‹ eafttp, 44* teen* (0.1) "44"m vi) Plot Date. 12/10/93 D& ign: MDS Drawn: MCL Checked: Revisions: Sheet Number 50F5 SEC X,TXS,RXE,WM ••• X 4.4•4•44,4.....*•44444•4 I— a. LU SDR 93-25 6 OF 19 INDEX TO SHEETS, SITE PLAN / COVER SHEET GRADING & UTILITY PLAN DECEIVED PLANNING 1 OF 5 2 OF 5 3 OF 5 4 OF 5 5 OF 5 OWNER SDR (:?T 25 FLOOR PLAN ELEVATIONS LANDSCAPE PLAN DEC 1 6 1993 4444444■4.4.444..4.44,444. WINMER COMPANY, INC. (WASHINGTON SQAURE, INC.) 700 5TH AVENUE, SUITE 2600 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104-5026 PHONE: (206) 223-4500 CONTACT: RANDY KYTE, VICE PRESIDENT ENGINEER, PLANNER, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, SURVEYOR W&H PACIFIC, INC. P.O. BOX 80040 PORTLAND, OREGON 9 7280 PHONE.' 503— 626— 0455 FAX: 503-526-0775 CONTACT: JIMMY BELLOMY, A.S.L.A. PROJECT PLANNER ARCHITECT BENNER STANGE ASSOCIATES •10 NW 10TH AVENUE SUITE 300 PORTLAND, OREGON 97209 PHONE: (503) 228-0666 FAX: (503) 228-3821 CONTACT: ROGER STANGE, A.I.A. 1 SOO Von 1•111 ' • 1 lim.1■•••••••.11 OM .1 ••• R MON I. mum••••••••• Owl 1033 Mmolammm.1 113•3 03.1, 1.■•••••••••..11 3••■ ••■• 11.•••••■••••••1 13133 #4. LEGAL DESCRIPTION TAX LOTS 300, 400 & 500 TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, SECTION 26, W.M. (1S1 26C) SITE DATA SITE SIZE ZONINC MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE PROPOSED SITE COVEPAGE MINIMUM • REQUIRED LANDSCAPE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE REQUIRED PARKING SPACES PROPOSED, PARKING SPACES (TOTAL) PARKING RATIO HANDICAPPED SPACES BUILDING CROSS. FLOOR AREA NOTES 2.38 AC. C—G 85% 76% 15% 24% 63 125 4,48/1000 S.F.• 2 25,000 S.F. 4 Q. OF R.O.W CREENBURG ROA rr4. , • rt. 4. 44 ■■ -rgrri 4 0 NIA 1••■••■•••■•••••••.•••••3••■■••••••=vmm 1•33 .1 On 1•111•3••11.3.3.111.1•133•1311•• me am •••■••■•••••••••■ war gm LINE OF PROPOSED R. 0. W NM = 10' (TYP) = 2 (TYP) 0 15' (TYP) lk 1 1 1 , I 1 1 I 240'F Q" „IE.+ 30' 125' CD 0 24' PROGRESS CRESTWOOD 01,1ESTFAD LN DOWNS ALDEN OODWI g ZeitlIAY GOO' COURSE LESLIE BEA ?" Pop. 36, Progress 4'41, 0,4,t, 40._ Bradley W Corn9r 130MA CT TA BIRCH CEDARCR cEDAR PLANNING —0— SURVEYING —0— ENGINEERING — 0 — LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 8405 S.W. NIMBUS AVENUE P.O. 130X 80040 PORTLAND, OREGON 7280 (503) 820-0455 Fax: (503) 528-07715 0 PROJECT SITE GREET( WAY /11.P, 0.11 1 L BORDERS 1d,P, 4.44 TIGARD Pop. 23,335 PAM 11/2 CrtY) .‘C) as IRONWOOD LEHMAN CORAL LOCUST 4 Metzger ST. RNGLEVOOD PARK CT. A T. O'T L. ST, COTTONWOOD LN LONGSTAfF- NEW bR1VEWAY ACCESS a 17 MONO. wo. CIRO .......41.01RIONNONNIMMOGIONNINRIMII ••••••••fterwoollwasin.■•••■••••■ - --•-••••••• • 4 Moo IF THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. Imo •••••••••••••....•••••••••••■••twmar. ON NPR ••• 1.3•••••■•••11 EXISTING PARKING LOT 111.3mimm••• .1.•••••••••••••••••1.11 3••••••••11•0.1 OM MN 1■•••••••••,.... 11111-111-1111:17111 I 11-111'11 II 1 11 I 1if1T41-11Tfli IJi1 ijil IIJJ liii Jill Jill liii IIIJ Jill 1111 liii liii liii iiiiliiii Jill IlIlIllil liii NM /ISO INMINOol If5iiill71111-141 1111,11 ji 1'11114 .1111111 111111; 111111111 11111111P! 1 1111?1 n ACCESS • - "EXISTINC PARKING LCT I 11 liii 111111111 1111111131 No,36 lilt lIllillit lilt lilt liii liii itillilit till tiiiIiii NORTH lill'11111111.111 1 12 NORTH DAKOTA VICINITY MAP N. T, S. LEGEND R SCALE 1":=301 1 1741 7-1 1 1-.1 SURFACE VAULT MANHOLE, TYPE NOTED SEWER CLEANOUT CATCH BASIN WATER METER FIRE HYDRANT SIGN POST WATER VALVE" POWER POLE STREET LIGHT TRAFFIC CONTROL LER PLANTER EXISTING BUILDING LINE PROPOSED BUILDING LINE TRUCK LOADING ZONE REFUSE (RECYCLABLES) AREA 15 30 60 NORTH z Piot Date. 12/10/93 Design: JAB Drawn: MCL `hecked: Revisions: BENNER STANGE ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, P.C. 10 N.W. TENTH AVENUE SUITE 300 PORTLAND, OR 97209 (503) 228.0666 FAX (503) 228•3821 a.,,•■••••••■•••■ Sheet Number 1 OF 5 SEC X, T X 5, R X E, WM • 1,4 (0 rr 1 Q F' 0 R.O.W . GRtENB 1.7 ROA YONINNIMUNOWIMMINIMMINNOIIINTRINIMI•1111.01=111.1111,,,,,I 411•11,1.0. wow mom marronworm.m... mr.ro onm. onnommordwousonomi mor. mot LINE OF PROPOSED R.O,W 4 1 DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE co CB 237,6 t3 CO CB 237,4 STM • CO z w 0 Z n I- C!) Z 2 0 Z \\41 I ACCESS 1 LEGEND („5 andraNSIMINROOMBLEfiiiiINNEM th (1-5y7d 09 1% CO -AP SURFACE VAULT MANHOLE, 'TYPE NOTED SEWER CLEANOUT CATCH BASIN WATER METER FIRE HYDRANT SIGN POST WATER VALVE POWER POLE STREET LIGHT TRAFFIC CONTROLLER PLANTER EXISTING BUILDING LINE PROPOSED BUILDING LINE 0 PROPOSED CATCH BASIN PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSE'D MANHOLE SPOT ELEVATION co CLEAN OUT -STM - PROPOSED STORM LINE - 4"W - PROPOSED WATER LINE- TRUCK LOADING ZONE EXISTING CONTOUR MIN M. 110.31NLIMMIS.......1 NUN OMNI IMVIRIPIMMINI mom mop 01.1 ONO ININIUMMNIMMOINIMMII MUM IN. 1,1,vom P.m POMO ININIUMMINI, arrommegmlomparrommommor wan paw ..son won swool man ors.ownwomowts Imo on, smaroommimmomen man IMMO 111111.111 •■•••11.111•11111111A1M1101•1 • PLANNING --o— SURVEYING —0— ENGINEERING —0— LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 0405 S.W. NIMBUS AVENUE t3,0, BOX 80040 PORTLAND, OREGON 97080 (503) 828-0455 Fax: (503) 528-.0775 0 („D EXISTING EAST PARKING LOT BENNER STANGE ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, P.C. 10 NW. TENTH AVENUE SUITE 300 PORTLAND, OR 97209 (503) 228.0666 FAX (503) 228.3821 SCALE 1"=20' SDR 93-25 7 OF 19 if THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OV THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. TETT trtrpirrilI ;116111;) 1 8 1111 g L 111111111 1111111111111 111114111g 1 1 trorfrpriittrirprT1 111111111 9 l( 1111 I 1111T1 No.35 10 20 40 NORTH apamtkei Plot Date. 1 2/1 0/93 Design: JRC Drawn: MCL Checked: Revisions: Sheet Number 2 OF 5 !SEC X, T X S, R X E, WM . SCA 93.25 8 OF 19 • 'r IF THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. • 17111 � �.t `I I' g-r17111,1 111111 111111114 N fez Ifd • 1. 14DOGAPE CUFF DM, LEAK CHAIW.INK PROVIDE MEOW:4AM' F.:1RACMG 4 WHEEL& ON EACH GATE FOR 6TAVLITY. ,I CUB TRASH ENCLOSURE SITE DATA SITE AREA : RETAIL TRASH ENCLOSURE SECTION 2 k2'1_I' -O" (2.38 ACRES) PARKING PROVIDED : HANDICAPPED PROVIDED : TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED PARKING RATIO : SITE COVER.\GE : (INCLUDES : k3UILPING AND IMPERVIOUS AREAS) LANDSCAPE COVERAGE 103,719 S.E. 25,000 S.F. 123 $PACES 2 SPACES 125 SPACES 5.0 SPACES / 1,000 S.F. 84.76 1524 GREENBURG ROAD M.M. 1.b M11 1 .ND■111011•=111 Mme. w.! ,i.1.b111.1•101f 01111.1■1011ma./M.111 Oa. orb ri-F BICYCLE AC TYP. HANDICAP RAMP LINE OF CANOPY AE3OVE 4.= MIA i RUE ENSTE IN '5 FU RN f TURF 24o' -/9tiM RETAIL 25;000 S.F. 18� TRASH AND RECYCLING —ENCLOSURES (TYP.) „+ CONC. PLAZA W/ MED. BROOM - FINISH (TYP.) 30' ACCESS TO EXISTING PARKING LOT SITE PLAN 31' -0' ...ONO MMN.,, NI, NDND. ... ... w.. ..A psa,. ...IY ... ... Mo.. EAST PARKING LOT w .r I 1 �Ir9�l •01.1Y»M... ON. w.. 4.30-0" 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . luu (llllllll Illllllll I I1111111 F11111111 111111111 Ilillllll 111111111 111111111 I11111ii1 II1111111 111111111 1II1111 I 111111111 IN111ll uu�uu 6 a e 111111111 0 IIII�IIII 11111.11r 111,1d I I Ii1�111111111 111111i11111�1I111111 111M II tell) _ .. ' Sere"b,kmi 0?y lY49 Q w 0 W CO Q w#±1 W W c� z 0 z PROJECT NO. 9318 DRAWN BY : KMG CHECKED BY DATE : 12-16 -93 REVISION A BENNER STANGE ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, P.C. 10 N.N. TENTH AVENUE SUITE 300 PORTLAND, OR 97209 (503) 226.0666 FAX (503) 2263621 FLOOR PLAN DESIGN REVIEW 3 OP 5 • • SDR 93 -25 9Of: 19 METAL ROOF SYNTHETIC PLASTER -- 3Z-0" 141ETAL AWNING EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16° = 1' -0° SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16",= 1' -0° SYNTHETIC PLASTER REVEALS • METAL ROOF MASONRY WALLS AND COLUMNS ALUMINUM STORE FRONT MASONRY ACCENTS MASONRY WALL STEEL EXIT DOORS 3S' -o: A F.F. 22' -0, A.F.F:,, „ t o' 8.144. 114 NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" = 1' -0" WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" = 1 +•0• IF THIS DOCUMENT IS MSS LEGII3LE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS UUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT . fi 1= [II 1ill Tir 1I trill' 1L 111111111 111111111 11111111 11111111111111111111111►111 FIT ;1��jfi7KrT1Ti7Tt10i fti1Jfl11TtTf1 i:i 1 pJii1111. d. 111111111 111111111 11111I111 1111111111 111111111 11IIIIIIIIISIIIIIIII No,30 e wAirr.....r 111111,11111'11111111111111111 111111111 T ai�iyd 1111Iid11 20`"•0• A.F.F. 0.a A.F.F. SECTION SCALE: 1/16" = 1'•0" ar artoltai NY9 W Q� w oU Oz.-M c WZz crI< D 0 0 6 0 (in 0 W cc z€< 0 Z /R F V � z PROJECT NO. 9315 DRAWN BY CHECKED c3Y DATE : 12-16-93 REVISION : BENNER STANGE ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, P.O. 10 N.W. `TENTH AVENUE SUITE 300 PORTLAND, Of 97209 (5 `3) 2280685 FAX (503) 228.3821 ELEVATIONS DESIGN REVIEW OF GREENBURG ROAD PROPOSE • AIIMPNW PROPOSED BIKE RACK ` w 4t0) ■f '1114, 1 ►� Terti 0 Z I-- 0 W 0 ce 0 to -J 0 (0 w e. C 0 SDR 93-25 loot:19 IF THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. 41100 61.14PRIPIre AfAIMP EAST PARKING LOT 111liII(I TI' Ilf�`II)I I jisk I+�?J r �� rya RECOMMENDED PLANT MATERIALS: Acer placanoides Liquidamber styraciflua lulus spp. Prunus serrulata 'Kwar zan' Azalea karume 'Coral 13e11s' Berberis thunbergii 'Rose Glow' Juniperus sabina 'Tamarscifolia' Mahonia aquifolium Rhododendron spp Viburnum davidii Hedera helix 'Needlepoint' Lawn II riliprzrlIrrr glip-rp.� r11�1 Iilllllllll�I IIILIIIVIII�I$ I •I I i11140iiluii iuilui 111111111 II1111111 111111111 (111111 111111111 Norway Muple American Sweetgum Snow 'It Crabapple Kwa,zan Flowering Cherry Coral Bells Azalea Rose Glow Barberry Tamarix Juniper Oregon Grape Rhododendron David 'Viburnum Needlepoint Ivy :ri1 r rtpliffitRipTiitorriip rtirpirriTpi t 1 l t p r 11. i No,66 ii E II g 1! o.' lira 11111111111119 L 11111 liii 9 lIII liii1fu IIII�IIII IIIIIIIII iiIIIIIII Illl�llll IIII��III 111111111 ►11111111 x ' 0 TREE WRAP FROM GROUND TO FIRST BRANCH (2) 2X2 S4S DE 8" STAKES DO NOT PENETRATE ROOT BALL WITH STAP ES. DRIVE 3' MIN. TREE TIES `--- REMOVE BURLAP AND TWINE FROM TOP 1/3 OF BALL AFTER STAKING REMOVE ALL TWINE AROUND BASE OF TREE TRUNK TO THE FIRST BRANCH. PLACE ROOT BALL AT TOP OF MULCH LAYER. Oiewmamial ►`►iCri aimungsms 1A /111111 /4 alairmsai rurr.rri L�l1Ols�rrn+J SCALE. 1"=20' 10 20 40 *b13.81A ROOT BALL TR:E PLAN NORTH ci TINC� MULQH CIRCLE WATER BASIN 2" APPROX, DEPTH MIN, 24" DIA. BARK MULCH CIRCLE IN TURF AREAS. SOIL MIX BACKFILL AS SPECIFIED. SCARIFY WALLS AND BOTTOM OF PLANTING PIT. ET4IL NT5 BENNER STANCE ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, P.C. 10 N.W. TENTH AVENUE SUITE 300 PORTLAND, OR 97209 (503) 2280666 FAX (503) 228.3821 PLANNING —0— SURVEYING -0 ENGINEERING —o LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 0405 S.W. NIMBUS AVENUE P.O. BOX 80040 PORTLAND, OREGON 97280 (503) 626 -0455 Fax: (503) 528 -0775 LU 0 Iftaft z iv< • rZ4Q LaLJ raft C4 W Q CIL" (jr) V) :4( tAri Plot Date: 12/10/93 Design: MDS • Drawn: Checked: MCL. A Sheet Number 50F5 SEC X, T X S, R X E, WM [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] XREF LI5T: X WS() TF 01 WS OD E, PDXL0C.;') 24364 ' 0.00.00.0.0110,0.000,004 woo CONTROL P0/NT ELEV 241.71 SDR 93-25 13 OF 19 0, tL .01.0000.0.4,1.00,0110.00.140.0/400010000031110.101.01111.04.016001.100010110111 MOM ..,„..,,..94,...,,w.,ti,,,,4rorall40444awsa44,4wAAAA.,;..,AAw.,w,...,,,,,,....,,m,,,,;.;,,,,wwm,;...".;*m,waAarmrA.Awgw4;14.44,44*01A44,40404001A44044444A44444004.010;004.01'4'01000°00-....44°°.°.'.'";00'.00W0;000.AA044,0004sat".444A4,444444A4,AA;ri.srmrow44oa44aa,0044Ah4;Aauai4umowwmt,,44oe440s44•Arpwspai,A.A4W44.4*040'•404.04400MAA04'4444a0AA4040f4044A.440044A'044044A INSTALL 2" METER FOR 1-. tRRIGATION & FUTURE / WATER SER VICE 4 A 4 1 ±28' 7,, gm. AIM* 40.M.0 1004..000000.1.1101.11.0011111 WV. 0T11113 (PROPOSED FIRE. HYDRANT i(NIC)) „. STUB FOR FUTURE FIRE SERVICE 400, 44.1.10.4.4,4 p 44,44A 44444 4404044444,141441410414644 •••••••44.......................... ............... 1........,.......44 .........'"..="...r,..." a 4, 4 IRMO 40100110 Ilakelli.0017111211ti 17 L.F. 6" SD AT S=1.18Pg 4 1 ° 6' Lg 4 • • .70,84,4, 4 -'4 ONE FOOT NON- ACCESS RESERVE STRIP EASEMLNT 3 4A 4 MAINWIMAIWOMANA4.410 12 L. F, 6" SO AT S=1,67% mi. 44yr 1 era 44001,-***-- !?)je":""."""*"""''""."' --12 F 6" SD AT S= 50% ■CB 11 RIM 237.20 IE = 236.70 i ...", ...r...--1 ..,...-.----. ,--. 1----.-- ',',„;:.i.-.0'-e:;:titg..?.t.'!c -4444,,z444-4.*-4- 19' CO CB 7 RIa772,37.60- ' E = 23.5. 60 1)0 ,•''‘,' ,, ,..v..4,1;.5.z.,Z71-...' .4,044,444.44,* 13 1 ,......1,,.„ ..,-----r-"' - IV - -0.- „.-- - ,.....---- .....; L I••■••■•I ;4-Q t,(4 C.4?, ...m,"" ?, i' 0,z . • 19' 1 0 CB RIM 237.40 IE = 236.40 \ CB, 2 RIM 237.40 IE = 236.70 • .47 27 L.F. Si.:1 AT S0,56% CB 4 RIM 2,37. IE = 235.10 NC) 4414104101111004 W4.014a,..,04 qi FORE 246-6699 74- 5' TYP, ....„, L. ...- ,,.., .. ---f ,,, 24' 3 , 19 ?.,-..... ,, . , , 24' • 1.4Z ; et, 4. 4, -- TYP. IE 78" 50=234.50 CN 7 41fi-k. CO )1"-------- STM 704 _23.5.60 .0 .........___........_____ sfivi .................._. 1." AC \ZO ••••- • • .4* t../ Z,Z) 1.1 0X8X10 WYE c13 1400.04,040404,4, 6.35' 1 n • c9 -9\0 0 6 RIM 237.40 IE = 235,40 15X 3X10 !NYE=,i'31.6.; ------- 60 L. F. 18" CSP AT S=0.50% IE 18" SD= 234. 20 TAW 41,4,4,1400 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM LATERAL ; A: ■1 7 ' , t, ' 4 „ ' IF THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. ; ,.. 404.00.40,44.1 (TYP.) 014.4* ca 4 5 RIM 23740 Lic9 = 235.40 5' Typ, 15 L F. 8" SD AT S=2.67Z 235.50- 1. 75" ORIFICE -- X2 CATCH BASIN\ 233.20 4, 1,4,444,044,0104, REMOVE TEMPORARY DRIVEWAY/ i iTt rp-irr Iijiiiiiii 1111 1111 IlIlItIll III 'I' IIrITl-rr 4 1111 11'1)1 9; .• 1111 cEm coAL N 0 TEs. ,•••••.4011 1, ALL STORM SEWER PIPES SHALL 6E TRENCHED FOR, BEDDED AND BACKFILLEE;, PER WASH. CO. STD, DETAIL M-406, AGGREGATE SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 95X OF OPTIMUM DENSITY AS DETERMINED BY AASHTO T-99. 3, ASPHALT CONCRETE SHALL BE COMPACTED TO A DENSITY OF AT LEAST 95.Z, OF THE DENSITY AS DETERMINED BY ASTM 0-159. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. BURIED UTILITIES MAY EXIST IN THE AREA IN ADDITION TO THOSE SHOWN ON THE PLAN. ANY UTILITY DAMAGED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL BE RETURNED TO FULL. SERVICE IMMEDIATELY AND ANY COST Of? EXPENSE CONSIDERED TO 6E LOST BY THE UTILITY USER SHALL BE THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY. 5. THE CONTRACTOR MUST ASSUME ALL BURIED UTILITIES ENCOUNTERED ARE ALIVE AND ACTIVE UNLESS SPECIFICALLY INSTRUCTED OTHERWISE BY THE OWNERS OR OPERATORS OF SAID UTILITIES, THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN IN rt-its PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. WHEN WORK IS BEING CONDUCTED IN THE VICINITY OF KNOW UTILITIES, THIER ACTUAL LOCATION MUST BE FIELD VERIFIED TO AVOID CONFLICTS OR DAMAGE TO THOSE UTILITES, VARIATION IN LOCATION BETWEEN RECORDED POSITIONS SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED, 6. PAVEMENT SEUION TO BE 3 iNCHES OF ODOT CLASS "C" BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AND 3 INCHES OF 3/4" -0 BASE COURSE 7, HANDiCAP PAqKING WILL BE SUPPLIED WHEN FUTURE BUILDING IS INSTALLED. 8. ALL PRIVATE PLUMBING TO CONFORM TO rHE LA TES r EDITION OF THE UN/FORM P UMBING CODE. A; 4., CONSTRUCTION NOTES: C\ CONS TRUCT 6' VWDE CONCfrETE SIDEWALK ALONG GREENBURG AND 1 ) 5 SIDEWALK ALONG ACCESS RD, 4 PER WA. CO. DETAIL CS-305. CONSTRUCT ACCESS RAMP PER WASH. CO. STD. DETAIL CS-306 & A,D.A., DEMOLISH EXISTING BUILDING, FENCING, RETAINING WALLS, PAVEMENT, FOUNDATIONS, ETC AND DISPOSE or OFF SITE. GRADE SHALLOW SWALE AS SHOWN ON PLANS. MINIMUM 3' BOTTOM AND DAYLIGHT SIDESLOPES AT 2 TO 1, .) CONSTRUCT WATER QUALITY POND AS SHOWN, SIDESLOPES TO BE' GRADED AT 3 TO 1 SIDESLOPES FROM 233.20 CONTOUR, FIFID INLE ,,,,/ WO, ORFICE EL= 232. 70 LOW PT. OF GRATE = 23L50 IE OUT 12" SD = 232.70 it: BOTTOA4 OF SUMP = 20, 70 CONTROL POINT ----\\ELEV = 237.89 iirrirp I 11r1.1111111111111111r1 1111 1111 c 1111 11111; 11111.1L1 111111111 111111 immresmalsotammotoWartmalmoOsoOmmli# 11111111111"111[1111111-9171111111Tifrol •i: 1111 1111111'1'1 -111g1 .1110 1111111.111 6 111111111 s 111111111 1,1 imil1111 7Th 11111111 I 11, 1111111111iI.1 11111111 111111111 No438 -- 1111 IIII 11111111 I tiim 111111111 11111'111 4,0 SAWCUT & REMOVE EXISTING CURBING/PAVEMENT. INSTALL COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY PER WASH. CO, STD. DETAIL DW- 201. REMOVE MEDIAN AS SHOWN. CURBING SHOWN IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITH EXTRUDED CURBING. INSTALL STANDARD CURBING AROUND PERIMETER PARKING PER WASH. CO. STD. DETAIL CS-301. REMOVE EXISTING LIGHT POLE. RAMP WALK DOWN TO MATCH AC GRADE. TRANSITTION DOWN MIN. 6'. INSTALL 200W LUMINAIRE ON EXISTING POLE. REMOVE DRIVEWAY AND INSTALL NEW CURB AND SIDEWALK PER NOTE 1. DECOMISSION EXISTING WATER VALVE & METER. COORDINATE WITH WATER DISTRCT, RELOCATE SIGN TO BACK OF NEW SIDEWALK REMOVE PARKING LOT STRIPPING INSTALL 250 WATT METAL HALIDE KIM EKG 401 BRONZE FINISH MOUNTED TO 30' POLE (SUBSTITUTE FOR APPROVED EQUAL) UNCOVER BURIED 12 CSP FROM CATCH BASIN OUTFALL. EXTEND PIPE IF NECESSARY AND INSTALL 40 sr OF CLASS 100 RIP RAP. IE = 236.0 INSTALL 60 S.F. CLASS 100 RIP RAP AROUND 3:1 BEVEL AT ENDS OF 18" PIPE. DEMO EXISTING FIELD INLET AND .±26' OF 12" STORM DRAIN. DOMESTIC WATER AND SANITARY ARE NOT PART OF THIS PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION, LE'GEND- 1111 S PUMPIIIIMILIM2011010.141001101010120.01101101101110001.0111101.11001414114100101.101141110111101110100111111101 ,••••,..•-••••••••9••••••, $40.0.0sLogessoiAtoiams4,1044.swimowsiroiass$0.00assusamistLis***0404 10 FIELD INLET CATCH BASIN PROPOSED STORM DRAIN PROPOSED FIRE SERVICE' PROPOSED DOMESTIC SERVICE CONCRETE STANDARD CURB EXTRUDED CURB SAWCUT AND REidOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT EXISTING SANITARY EXISTING CAS EXISTING TELEPHONE EXISTING POWER ....se,imwmnwiwwmk-A.*..•.eo.*,*•••••"*-1 SCALE' 20 40 ( FEET ) 1 inch z.ut 20 ft. bbi Al /999 80 SHEET 1/2 - - •••••• II . c..-.) ..t.5 I .2: 0 vi 5, L.I.i Ck: CC) ..., 141 t''t _ . . _ 1 III .•_ . SHEET 1/2 - - •••••• [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] 4 d' a • 4 11 4t, SDR 93-25 15 OF 19 4 4, V. SEE MAP IS I 26C • SW 1/4 SE I/4 SE TION 26 TIS RIW WM, WASHINGT N COUNTY OREGON N'LE MAP LE 1":-.1001 15 I 2G.D13 b LA) 800 41' Ac. "tot, 'it ,4. 60 30) (C. S. No 12E37) I 90, 3' (no 201 202 0 A Pjq 1 tj 2 r EAST 190.50 (C S No. 1 1 5 8 5) 1400 4/ Ac. K) N 300 40 Ac 0) 0 N. 190,3' 14.61 44.29 te if? .N.. 4145 EAST KA 5.00 4...) a* EAST- 40 < C.0. Rd. Zerre ej Lit. /41. t-- to 13O1 .405 Ac. 9 5, 1 ' 2C4 90) 2.94 Ac. 5 N 1300 6 LU 500 .454c. 4 LU Ac. 700 .25 Mc. 75 501 O • .174r... 65,4 7:/: 1 5 7C.15 206 207 0 z 701 .,264c : 3. C S. NO. 1 1,02 I 9 LIU IC 7,0' 256.84 1200 .69 Ac, 0) N 7 111.4.1, 1800 •5Ac. BORDERS 190. 180 1 ,32Ac, WEST 190.30 C R.1270 1 20.3' STREET 9E61N 127:-#7''' 9 3.3' 1700 97' I 1600 .38 Ac. "i .164c, 06 1501 80 (110.5) 1500 .22 Ac. or I Pr 82-95 1005 I .2/ Ac. 1201 .344r. elm MP 179.0 1■1. 89° 5 W, 557.5 (CS 46581 80, 3 1000 .6/Ac. 1004 .354c, 1003 135 Ac 86 1002. .35 Ac 86 100l .354c INNYMIS■NII 1100 454c. 80 1102 .164c 105 2201 Ac I Pr I Pr M. Pr et Pf Pr I 0 46.8' 111 t./. 11` 3300 2.204c. 8, e9°•53 E. 67.7 18.3 86. 86 190.3' 80 850 LEHMANN C. R °,11.1t 2 55. 2' I 0 3301 .384c, 4124.41WX.1 190.3 JTREET 6400 3200 3100 .39 Ac .SP Ac. Ac. xc„ .42 Ac I Pr ao ill 45 I Pr Pr co co 85 3002 ; .174c. 2600 .224c, 5900 .014c. 5 3001 Ac. Ct> 14- itor (Dotes( BEGIN, 1 6 3 0 1 e I 1,9 n2AI 6601c. I I 4 9 f) orA 5700 LU LU fliluli 27.500 (I) ab 2 8 2, e' 4 3 2 6.0' 19 3600 .38 Ac. 190, 3700 4,7,4c 84 3701 .344c. 85 390 95.15' .414c. t7C61k..1.\\11 7515. 25111i::: '2.4 tl CPS • 2 G5,21 6000,7'1 IR v.11,63 111 15.46 74.96 .11 ti) (C.S. No. 1 1680) 2701 .22 .44. to 9 5.115' 95.15' 190 3' S,W C 1 3 0 '11 , k.- -VACATED 92-19149 95.15' 4500 Ac 95.15' 4400 .774c. s5.15' 95.15' 4200 .554C C W. 890 28' E, r-40#3' 150' 4100 -60 Ac. L 1539.9' 4003 .264c. 8,89° iw. 4001 264c. 95.I5 5800 .0/4c. 190. 190.3' 190.3 0 2702 OD S 89 6 9522 2902 .26.` c. 8' 53" W 95.22 te) 16; 2400 2402 4374c. • 10 C. 6 3.05 2903 .264c. C.S. 10415 2901 2900 .254c. .38 Ac. STREET 90 ic 0 280) .18Ac. 90 2800 .20Ac TERM 1630 C.R. 1 6 3 0 c0 0 cc CANCELLED TAX LOTS 600••Al, 200,5001,43 3400,5300, SEE MAP IS 1 26DD FOR ASSESSMEN. PURPOSES ONLY DO NOT RELY ON FOR ANY OTHER 5501 38 A( 5502 .38 Ac 95.15 .164c. 70 502 .16Ac. 0 0 70 5304 164c. 75.45 5301 ./74c. 41 )4.441# o.. 1114..... ft44 414., 6 4600 Z o 4602 (1) ./64c. 79 9 qi S. 89 90.3 19 0.3' 5200 20.Ac. 197.5 4701 .44 A 4700 .42 4c. 9 6.15' 40.3 150' 2j5t 44.5 /7,18 5505 02/AC. 6 5400 1.654c • 4800 ,47 Ac 4801 .30 Ac 4900 ,38 Ac 5000 .384c. 5100 .394c. .3 4114.4m.. 5203 474c. 5101 .384c. ( C 4 -ItY0 5202 174c N0. 11,444) 560C .19Ac. 8, 560i .344c. 15,16 5504 .214c. N. METZGER .NE TH OD 1 T 73.15 CHURCH 103 5201 '14:: /84c 5602 Ac. 5503 . MAc. 245. 4.4.4144.441.4.44414.464.4.4..44.4444.4.1.1414.1 3. 190.3' 60' 95.15 85 IF THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT . t4t 131,. "14, 1%, Nth. 44t •C 44;4 -8474k Nio., 11„ .164. 11,, -c-r4 514 hiN „QM. r,„, I' I. ta, t ills I rim- TITIIII1[11111 ,1 I 1.0 I I 11 71;36 I] 1 11111 1 004, #10951 4eitiaori • amti="401..04 ---61i 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1Z 8K LIZ 9Z -VZ 17Z I CZ ZZ 1 TZ 10Z I 61 IST IL T. I 9ii tI CT Z1 lill !RIM T 1 Mai ts-------16 iiii Iiil iiii 1111 8 iiii iiii LI iiiiiiiii 91' NM 91 !MIMI V Illi IMAM g lilt g MI MI toward 11114111 a is' C. R. 763 26D( 6,74; /999 4 f SIR 93 -25 16 OF 19 IF THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATIOP IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY, DO NOT RELY ON FOR ANY OTHER USE. SEE NEAP IS 1268 - L APPROX, '--,CENTER SEC., Fp.5 /5" 1R , �R 215 N 89°5'40 "E FD. 5/3 "1,R, 2700 2.79 AC. ( C.S. 20,777 ) d-- FD, 5/8"1.R. o NW I/4 SE I/4 SECTION 26 "� I S R I W W.M. WASHINGTON COUNTY SCALE I"= IDOL 199.98 i im:74 0* "'SO ,b6 5 SEE MAP IS I 26 t, "NJ' •39-' 203 .68 AC. to N CO ID 501 t**"' LY. 0 ZSEE MAP 0 to 06. co IS 1 26DE3 TIGARD SEE MAP IS I 26AD „INITIAL POINT „ -CADBORO ACRES- 181.79 704 4.32 AC. 202 0 298.90 200 t'v,,.b, ■FD 1 " LR r I 206 1.46 AC. i 0 Si (<,;') 0 to 100' 205 .52 AC. 5 184.50 <At <1*)'• e(298. <;,,)298.90 (6i a .� 0%O 302 1.50 AC. 3 (298.69) 298.90 0 to 0 0 X00 0) (149.98) 150' 4 FD, 5/8 1.R (298.58) 298.90 nor 175.27 mm 300 .94 AC. x to (C.S. 14,198) (C.S. 20,273) ( C.S. 23,673) FD, 5/8 " 1.R. 500 1.87 AC. to 0.r S 89° 20' 52 " W 260' �2 400 1.24 AC. -4 R . 40" U' FD. 5/8 125 INITIAL PT INITIAL PT. 2500 ki1444,kia k 0, N10 in mm M Pn N N itt C.S. 18,105) on FD. 5/8 I.R. ( C.S. 20,624 ) a- r PL 85 es' FD. 5/8" I.R. 1)r 0 <> 2200172.8 6a, 76,c cy; 2300 ‹si 8 ' C.) ev't 2800 4.70 AC. 53.25 P.T. 67.25 2400 ro 0 WCEDARCRESTti dcR 7 00 00 0:2 e (.5 cn 0 C) S o r i s FD. 5/8"1.R. 0c. NN N.1 COR. " LOT Ii -` ACRES' f tr Geo Itk 304 1100 °6 2.03 Ac. 156.65 5 a) pr)r) c`. g C ``)( r 0 L 69+4 2' 40" r z r r ct e(D INITIAL PT. C14I FARM L 9 APPROX. 1/16 CO L 9r, L 9/ 1000 .61 AC. N 85056156"W 700 1.07 AC. 900 .90 AC. ( C.S. 12,925) EAST I25� EASEMENTS 90-20691 220' 152.50 296.50 0 to 0 COR. liGOOD VIEW Iv 800 .93 AC. (CS. 23,786) 0 0 {.4 VACATED 0 2900 52 AC. a2 83 -43089 0 0) co N,4\ v1, 801 .20 AC. CANCELLED NO'S. 1500 1600 204 601 602 603 604 605 702 703 201 207 1400 1401 301 1101 1200 2600 803 .20 AC. 0 r I :icc; J:Ctr.riTH010F4TpRtlEr7L.I.Y, (,),” 220' '1644e'Z' viNNNNNIvNN,NNNA: 696.22 iM 296,50 90' 89-333 ori 01 oat> 60' 00 6 FD.5 "I.R 60 802 .17 AC. ry � ca 131.80 37.40 70.33 93,19 S. o O.0© 163.30 3 SEE MAP IS 128DC OE 6�Z 8Z LS 9Z -'9Z III VZ SZ ty) 60' 1/16 COR. TIGARD Is 1 26DB 074, /9 9 III III MI11111111 I I . IIII 8Q��s� 1111IIII IIII III I lllll Z I I I IIII�N I11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111iii ty) 60' 1/16 COR. TIGARD Is 1 26DB 074, /9 9 [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] • ' • a • • 44440 .4. IF THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. 44' ;EE MAP MAP S I 268C ER ON I 2680 sQ C.S, 8030 ""ctitt "11: 41 `41 ..i:. 4 i ht, < 1A.N ' SEE MP 00. IS I 26i ) ,t'. 4D . . s , : _d'" - ,— . t, , i,":4 6 ' ; i 4. La , 44 , . 44./ 23:72 ;t I '40' 0 ' ; EASEMENT) I •.,':4.,- • 4 "44 i 440 ! (1300 1303 64,979 DI IQ 40, .625 ()) Ne9o4s yi 213.49 I 1302 "1•358 -64 , 43 t I. isijoic. 1"."51 CS, 215.05 IS CANcr.LLED TA) 100911701, 18021 111/041110347040 1104 11500t 150101 0902, 40211041 1400,600p 700,8 110211102 , 1103f 18011110,4104 23:77 163.32 2364,1- 75 ' sQ 0 sQ II. C,S, 9229 ' olli till . 'II , ri C.S, 8277 I s 191411E 216 S9I j.... t17. 2 7' -- "Nefdirw 4174,rr— — • 100 438,4 c, (C,S, No: 10972) 51-438 11. 402 6.07.4c. • C.S. 142654 • 14 P •SE IS 1401 • 0 0 4.n .1 6 s o 972 41.11411 • '4 FIRST ADDITION 4 • TO 4) i 1 CRESCENT GROVE SCENT ciROVE;, CEMETERY CEMETERY % ILII431&128/4"116L‘Vskitilt.4 vh„„„ukokistbak 3 21.7 .1062.4.6t, _2584. N OV1(ft S89°5 E 448, -NW Cot., DAVID C. GRAHAM DLC No, 52 448,e' I S 09°51'E 5324 .404111141.1.10 IR I Ui 1°1 mr) H08 /.! OAC MATCH' LINE In No I P,Jint "OAKBURG" 3tE3 A ANC LOT SDR 93-25 18 OF 19 ' 444,144044144M11044/46444444,,,, 4,444-„, 41.,..Z.,7„111.1111401041401.- .044.1.114-41004844.4 4,44., 111/111IIITIII1111 I) I ••• 9. SEE MAF Is I 35BA . ,444:14.4..444444444,7'"‘ • 4 FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY DO N9T RELY ON FOR ANY OTHER USE 4. s ,c C011,,c.41 s‘ , Initial Poir. ICE:DARE:ROC SEE MAP IS I 26DC TIGAR m-fmTimbi '„ ' NO, 36 ....—_, ,...._ Oe 6? 8 3 /A 9; -VZ I7Z I CZ ZZ I Ig • 0 3Thi I $ IIII11111111111111111111111111111M111111111111111111111111 1111( MI 1111 111111111 9 1111 Illi IIIIIiiii iIIIIIIII iii1 1111 11111111 ' 4. s ,c C011,,c.41 s‘ , Initial Poir. ICE:DARE:ROC SEE MAP IS I 26DC TIGAR m-fmTimbi '„ ' NO, 36 ; ', 4, 4 s4 41 fo' • • •■ • • /999 4. 4 , ! ,g,r• 'r 44 ••• 444 • • I .4 • CD 1. A II, 'rill ?j C---iIZI Tili--"-T18 L 9 ' 9 t ' iii—H4,t 4 f11111111 HI11111 11111111 1111 lill 111111111 IIII liii 11111111 Hit iiii Hu iiii iiti iiii iiii ifii lin iiiiiiiii Hu m111111111111'1411 ; ', 4, 4 s4 41 fo' • • •■ • • /999 4. 4 , ! ,g,r• 'r 44 ••• 444 • • I .4 • CD 1. IF THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. tSHINGTON COUNTY OREGON SCALE ,I °• 00' SW,. S: *w.0, 100 09,4 Z Ay . SEE MAP IS I 23CD 468 SDR 93 -25 19 OF 19 w 0 0 .297.66' 5 1-65 17) to z 314.0 --"7"- I 4.0' S89039 an a F) 280.0' 247.64' 889' 39'E . F) 0 „N . 0 Y 6 W L �S! '2t S CANCELLED TAX LOTS $000100t700100,10001 401,SOO,o *10,130,140, 17039 SO4 , 1008300 q to 4e 8 0 1 ' s1 A. f ; bc. I ?o0,oio I,a7l02e1704 006 leo,.�I*oo,t000p50 ,t , 2102, t201,23009 FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY DO NOT RELY ON FOR ANY OTHE USE APPROX. CENTER ' CORNER 296.86' S89° 34'E. WEST 325.11' WEST 280.15' 2 I , , t' *.. 1 • Is 26B I 'III'�� 10�1�♦��I�111 Mo.38 t• r M air �hr.ne" l o. caw to 1 s a#V4fl)bi n7�{ ic/c/c/ �� I��.��I�� II IIII IIII III I I III IIII IIII IIII IIII lIIIII �liii � III III I8Q I III 11I I IIIIIIII 1Iil 4£Z�� IIIiII IIIIII IIINII a#V4fl)bi n7�{ ic/c/c/