Loading...
SDR1993-00017POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. SDR 93-0017 r PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION FILE NO: SDR 93 -0017 FILE TITLE: BINGHAM INVESTMENTS APPLICANT: Bingham Investments 3939 N.W. ST. Helens Road Portland, Or 97210 OWNER: Same REQUEST: A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 68,000 square foot grocery store. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Section 18.62.050, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. LOCATION: 16700 S.W. 72nd Avenue (WCTM 2S1 13AD, tax lot 1700) ZONE: CIT: East C -G (General Commercial) The General Commercial zone allows Public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, eating and drinking esablishments, among other uses. CIT REPRESENTATIVE: Joel Stevens PHONE NUMBER: 293 -1254 CHECK ALL WHICH APPLY: X STAFF DECISION COMMENTS DUE BACK TO STAFF ON 1993 PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME :7:30 - HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME:7 :00 _ CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME:7:30 ATTACHMENTS X VICINITY MAP X NARRATIVE X SITE PLAN STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea - 630 -4171 X LANDSCAPING PLAN X ARCHITECTURAL PLAN X OTHER: GRADING PLAN ;1 r. Cm OF TIGARD, OREGON SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION. CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639 -4171 FOR. STAFF USE ONLY 1. GENERAL INFORMATION /676n 5,w PROPERTY ADDRESS /LOCATION P d3T SIOE TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO.__ 0 �) SITE SIZE G.a a _ PROPERTY OWNER/DEED SOLDER* 6l w, Ch�__""__ ADDRESS 393 PAZ Sfi. ... ,6110NE ?? .._, Uire. CITY fry 0(2_ — ZIP APPLICANT* ADDRESS ._.__. PHONE CITY ZIP *Wien the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a le.asee in possession ri.Lth written authorization from the ,Jwner or an agent of the owner with written authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on page two or submit a written authorization with this application. 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY The owners of cord of the st +.h jest property request site development review approval to allow l', - 7.e.,-/ e, CASE NO. ` °CEO t rl OTHER CASE NO'S: /I-- RECEIPT NO. 9 ,4 . -i r APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: ■,: ° ) DATE: Application elements submitted: t.----(A) Application form (1) .././1B) Owner's signature /written authorization ZC) Title transfer instrument (1) Assessor's map (1) ,/,',(E) Plot plan (pre--app checklist) (F) Applicant's statement (pre -app checklist) m.z(H) Filing fee (t (3 ) (I) Construction Cost Estimate DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE: FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: COMP. PLAN /ZONE DESIGNATION: Approval bate: 0524P/13P Rev'd 5/87 3. List any variance, conditional use, sensitive lands, or other land use actions to be considered as part of this application: 4. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. 5. THE APPLICANT (S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that ma be attached to or imposed upon the 1141).1221.212221v. E. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are truce; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. D. The applicant has read th& entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. DATED this day of SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the subject property. M www`f City of Tigard, Oregon AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON County of Washington City of Tigard I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly iorn/affirm, on oath depose and say: that I am an Adrninistrative Specialist II for The City of Tigard, Oregon, That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED 0) PUBLIC HEARING FOR: (Check box above, if applicable) (check appropriate box below} (Enter Public Heanng Date above) City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Planning Commission Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard City Council That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED 0) DECISION FOR:. (Clvfft.k btu ebova, if applicable) City of Tigard Planning Director That I served NOTICE OF (AMe.NDED 0) FINAL ORDER FOR: (Check box above% if applicable) (check appropriate box below) City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Planning Commission • Tigard Hearings Officer • Tigard City Council A That 1 served OTHER NOTICE OF FOR: A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOT10E OF DECISION/NOT10E OF FINAL ORDERJOTHER NOTICE(S) of whji is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was id to eackna ed, person(s) at the addres;(s) shown on the attached li, t(s), marked Exhibit"B" an Ie c. I i y • . i t il'e.,-. 199 le ,and deposited in the Uni -d States Mail onthp ' e' da of .• , 9 , postage prepaid. c...— . – " Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the / 7 , day of DIANE M JELDERKs NOTA RY P1101.1C.OREGON COMMISSION NC) 046142 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBUI 0! 1099 "FILE INFO.:? NAME(S) CASE NO (s),,.W qg Typv, OF NOTICE & DATE NOTARY PUBLIC OF REGO My Commission E res: q 7 EXHIET MINNOMINVA Mr AIMS MillaRMIMLINENEUIR4 .4ONLSSIMTIIIIMMONMEMIIWIWISIMIININUMISMISIMINSUr CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION MINOR MODIFICATION TO AN APPROVED SITE PLAN SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 93-0017 BINGHAM/MEGAFOODS 1111111111MMOSIMMONIUMW11.1111011.. APPLICATION SUMMARY CASE: PROPOSAL: OWN E R/ APPLICANT: ZONING DESIGNATION: LOCATION: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: II. _DECISION FILE NAME: MeggFooda Site Development Review SDR 93-0017 A request for a Minor Modification to an approved Site Development Review (SDR 93-0017) (a 68,240 square foot grocery store), to provide for a 74,945 square foot shopping plaza consisting of a bookstore, home interiors store and a general retail pad. Bingham Investments 3939 N.W. St. Helens Road Portland, OR 97210 (503) 624-6300 C-G (General Commercial). 16700 SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 281 13AD, Tax Lot 1700). Community Development Code Section 18.120,070. WIT INON tION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. III, BACKGROUND INFORMATION Primer This parcel was annexed into the City of Tigard in 1976, and was zoned I-L (Light Industrial). A Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA 90-0004) and Zone Change (ZON 90-0002) was approved in 1990, changing the zoning from l-L (Light Industrial) to C-G (General Commercial). In 1993, a Site Development Review (SDR 930017) was approved allowing the construction of a 68,240 square foot grocery store, NOTICE OF DECISION -------- MINOR MODIFICATION (SDR 93.0017) ■■•■•■•■*Mor. PAGE.' t The site is bounded on the west by SW 72nd Avenue, on the east by Interstate 5, on the north by the Oregon Business Park, and on the south by a Tri-Met Park & Ride lot. Surrounding uses and zoning designations are an industrial park zoned I-L. (Light Industrial) to the north, and industrial park zoned I-P (Industrial Park) to the west. Industrial development is the predominant land use on the west side of the freeway interchange. Southwest 72nd Avenue is designated as a major collector street. An extension of Durham Road and traffic signal control improvements at the SW 72nd Avenue/Durham Road intersection have been completed. South of the site is the SW 72nd Avenue/Bridgeport Road intersection. This intersection is outside the City of Tigard. It is within the City of Tualatin, but under the jurisdiction of ODOT and Washington County, Site Informal and Proposal Descripion: The 6.6 acre undeveloped site is generally flat and is slightly below the grade of the freeway, thereby, providing substantial exposure to freeway traffic. There is a stand of large Douglas Fir trees on the site, along with smaller deciduous trees and low-lying brush. The applicant requests Minor Modification approval to the approved Site Development Review (SDR 93-0017). The modified site plan would provide for a 74,945 square foot commercial plaza, consisting of a bookstore, holm interiors store and a general retail pad. IV. APPLICABILEREVIEW CRITERIA, AND FINDINGS The Tigard Community Development Code, Site Development Review Section, states; "if the requested modification meets any of the major modification criteria, that this request shall be reviewed as a new Site Development Review application." This request does not meet any of the eleven (11) approval criteria for qualification as a major modification. Section 18.120.070(3) states that the Director shall determine that a major modification(s) will result if one or more of the following changes are proposed. There will be: 1. An increase in dwelling unit density, or lot coverage for residential development. This criteria is not applicable as this request involves commercial uses. 2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units. This criteria is not applicable as this request involves commercial uses. 3. A change that requires additional on.site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.106. The original approved grocery store use required 341 parking spaces, based upon a requil ed parking ratio of one (1) space per 200 gross square feet (68,240/400). The proposed general commercial retail space requires 187 spaces, based upon a required ratio of one (1) space per 400 gross NOTICE OF DECISION MINOR MODIFICATION (SOR 93-0017) PACE 2 square feet (74,945/400), This criteria is, therefore, satisfied as the change does not require additional on-site parking. The proposed plan is actually providing 347 parking spaces, which is more than the original plan. Even though the actual number of spaces has increased, the applicant is not being required to provide this many. Again, this criteria is satisfied as this increase is not required as a result of the modified site plan. 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code. Both the approved and proposed structure is classified as a B2 occupancy, thereby, satisfying this criteria. 5. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20 percent, The proposed height is 28 feet, eight (8) feet lower than the approved building height. This criteria is satisfied. 6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected. The modifications to the parking area will not effect off-site traffic. While the plan shows that the most southerly driveway has been moved approximately 125 feet, this change in location will not effect off-site traffic. The new location increases the distance between the access and the intersection of primary concern. 7. An increase in vehicular traffic to arid from the site and the increase can be expected to exceed 20 vehicles per day. The applicant's revised traffic study successfully shows that, although the total retail space is being increased, traffic will be reduced. This is largely accomplished by the low trip generation of the home interiors store. 8, An increase in the floor area proposed for a non-residential use by more than 10 percent excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet. The plan shows an increase from 68,240 square feet to 75,945 square feEA. This 6,705 square foot increase is a 9.8% increase, under the 10% limit in this criteria, 9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space which reduces the open space area below the minimum required by this code or reduces the open space area by more than 10 percent. There is no required open space element required for this project. The area devoted to landscaping has Increased from 49,216 square feet (16.5%) to 52,769 square feet (17.7%). The C-G zone requires the provision of a minimum of 15% of the site for landscaping. 10. A reduction of project amenities (Recreational facilities, 5/Greening; and/or, Landscaping provisions) below the minimum established by this code or by !lore than 10 percent where specified in the site plan. Recreational facilities are not required as part of a commercial development. Screening shall be provided in accordance with code standards. The area devoted to landscaping has increased from 49,216 square feet (16.5%) to 52,769 square feet (17.7%). The 0-0 zone requires the provision of a minimum of 15% of the site for landscaping. NOTICE OF DECISION MINOR MODIFICATION (SDR 93.0017) PAGE 3 11. A modification to the conditions imposed at the tine of site development review approval which are not the subject of B. 1 through 10 above of this subsoction. The Engineering Department has stated that the proposed utilities and public improvements do not require modifications of the conditions of approval. The revised plan also shows how all of the development standards contained in the original decision can, and will be satisfied, Therefore, this request is determined to be a minor modification to an existing site. The Director's designee has determined that the proposed minor modification of this existing site will promote the general welfare of the City and will not be significantly detrimental, nor injurious, to surrounding properties provided that development which occurs after this decision complies with applicable local, state and federal laws. V. OTHER STAFESOMMENTS The City of Tigard Engineering Department has reviewed this proposal and has the following comments: The requested approval may be approved upon a finding that the proposed modification is not a major modification(s) in accordance with Subsection 18.120.070B of the Community Developmert Code, Item 6 of that subsection is a "change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected". The modified site plan shows that the proposed access to SW 72nd has been relocated about 125' south, Since this increases the distance between the access and the intersection of concern, no adverse affect to off-site traffic is expected, Moreov1r, there are no driveways along the opposite side of SW 72nd Avenue creating alignment concerns. Item 7 is "an increase in vehicular traffic to, and from the site, and the increase can be expected to exceed 20 vehicles per day." The Applicant's revised traffic study successfully shows that although the total retail space is being increased, traffic will be reduced. This is largely accomplished by the low 'trip generation of the home interiors store. Item 11 is a "modification to the conditions of approval". The currently proposed utilities and public improvements do not require modifications of the conditions of approval. Rec,pmmendajLQfl: The Engineering Department has no objection to the proposed Minor Modification. &Ace: PROCIEMEAND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owners of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies TAIN6FTMODIFICATION (SOR 93-0017) NOTICE OP DECISION PAGE 4 THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON MARCH 13, 1996 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 p.m. on March 13, 1996. -I If you have questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. PREPARED BY: William D'Andrea Assi49nt Planner /.1 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewer Senior Planner' • V VY_Ya�' ...••■■••• Y • ••••••••••••••••••• • 4rw■n•■••■■ Y Y 1 V •I•••••••••••V ^•M 1 V }mosammvAV • Y •••••••••••••Y•y••• • • ••••••••••••• • • WORI .4 00V 4411,1104f, DEVISED PLAN FOR A MINOR MODIFICATION TO: SDD 95.00i MEGAEOODS V • . • • . • • • •'•, 4.‘ • . . SDR 93-0017 MEGAFOODS MINOR MODIFICATION 2S113AC-00103 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES LP 15115 SW SEQUOIA PKWY #200-WMI PORTLAND, OR 97224 2S113AC-00101 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES tP 15115 SW S .0.1.101A-PRINY #200-WMI ND, OR 97224 28113AC-00100 WASHINGTON COUNTY FACILITIES MGMT-AMIN 150 N FIRST AVE, RM B-7 HILLSBORO, OR 97124 „ (Page 1/1) 2S113AD-01700 BINGHAM INVESTMENT CO 3939 SW ST HELENS ROAD PORTLAND, OR 97210 2S113A0-01800 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIAT 15115 SV_V...0„ak• PAtKID, OR 972 4 2S113AD-00500 SWETT, CARL R 13485 ATWATER LANE LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97034 EXHIBIT B 4/less", PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES/ L.P. 15350 SW SEQUOIA PARKWAY, SUITE 300 PORTLAND OR 97224 • • , • • 40 BINGHAM SITE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TIGARD, OREGON September 17, 1993 Prepared For: Bingharr Construction Cornpany Prepared By: Mackenzie Engineering Incorporated P.0, Box 69039 Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 Phone (503) 224-9560 Fax (503) 228-1285 MEI Project Number 293037.01 PAWPDATA\SPECS\TS\93031,01\23TS1 iko '7 • f. • , . w ; • , TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION IL EXISTING CONDITIONS EXISTING TRAFFIC - BACKGROUND GROWTH - IN-PROCESS TRAFFIC HI. FUTURE CONDITIONS IV. PEDESTRIAN AND TRANSIT SERVICES - PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES - MASS-TRANSIT AVAILABILITY V. SITE TRIP GENERATION VI TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT VII. WARRANT ANALYSIS SIGNALIZATION WARRANTS VIII. INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS IX. VEHICULAR STORAGE REQUIREMENTS X. 72ND AND BRIDGEPORT MITIGATION - SIGNAL SEQUENCE • ASSESSMENT OF ISSUES AND MITIGATION XL CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS XII. APPENDIX (UNDER SEPARATE COVER) - CAPACITY CALCULATIONS • WARRANT CALCULATIONS P:\WPIDATASPECSVTS\9308l.01 \23181.ks .0 • I pt • I INTRODUCTION This analysis has been prepared to address the traffic impacts anticipated upon development and occupancy of a proposed 68,000 square foot grocery store on the subject property. The project site is located on S.W. 72nd Avenue south of Oregon Business Park and north of the recently constructed Tri -Met park and ride lot. The property is currently undeveloped. Figure 1 illustrates the Site Plan for the project. In 1990, the subject parcel received a zone change approval from IP (industrial park) to CG (general commercial). At that time, Mackenzie Engineering Incorporated reviewed comparative traffic impacts between industrial and commercial use. After an extensive review, it was determined that the traffic impacts under the different land uses were comparable. The zone change request was granted. At that time, it was evident that operation of the Lower Boones Ferry corridor was near capacity, primarily due to the limited spacing between the southbound interchange and the adjacent 72nd /Bridgeport intersection. A multi - jurisdiction effort was discussed to relocate the 72nd /Bridgeport intersection to increase the critical spacing, but no formal agreement or financing was reached. This report addresses the traffic related issues associated with development of the proposed retail use, including specific focus on the spacing and operational concerns discussed above. Current traffic levels were determined for use in evaluation of traffic impacts and potential mitigative improvements. This analysis has been prepared for submittal to the City of ligard as a requirement of Site Development Review, This document will be also submitted for review by the Oregon Department of Transportation and other interested parties. P;` WPDATArsPEcs \rs \93037.01\23rs1.ks 1 c.tivattosito3i•two osediivi 1011 lap*, • 11•0111.4•Mg1010101604.11 la•••■•••••••••610.4 11•••••••■ ° g s 0. 0 ,Nc rP7 r .42 It I 9 72ND A VEN UE A v • / r- 4'0,4 • 1 • • 1. \ k.;\ 5 • 3 , \s.„ \ \\\\*N•\,\:1'. ").ti`c4t • , w „.••,;., ,.... •,,,,, _ i....0,,,...". 41/1101110111111111111111NOMPI g''''' 1 ' , ,f• 4.. A OM.. II ..,.. • 4.,, . '"S ; i - ii ••,_ g44. ,,,,,,,, . . *".. "-•-• i . ; 4, t , ."". • • *<,,': Ir'',t . * A A ° ,•:. . " 1 "• '''„ ..r. i''• . , • ; • i , )5.: II ''.:•:'•,.. . i 5 il‘**1 ... *1 « • g 1 , -7. • • / ..„ . ,,,, •••*.-- -4-. ,i . 14, 4.,.‘• 't :...‘ .(''' '' '.•:'' ‘':45 ;:;''''::.: . 1°•t• ' ' ... : Tr) ! 1 l'••;',. ''''''• '' i r . g; ' ' ..., ' '4,.''' Pp '''°°, ■ re" . t ". ' •. ..,..;a. fr'4. t .E ; . •:"'"'"*"' *. ..5•P.,1! I'.. .s .i..,, ! g ..t.,.,. . . . . . . • .. ...tL., . *l Al.. ' Y t .°' ••.• b. i *I ;.* • v • 1:1 46.* I' ' III i; *s. • rtFirp,,,.,:4 7E, • ! , i , 71'...4 • .,. .1., 4% ... ..,, 1 ....NI '0 ,, 'WS,. ,..:Ze:,t , II • 0 I I 4 / ' '''''. . :4., . , • : ' . . ■ ' ! d . • • . . . . • • . I • 0 0 ''''',,,,,,,..41 • a z t A 1 fir tqc piAt4 OINGHAM DEVELOPIANT Tigods 0 ret g ti ii$481.14Ett 0414004 Ii4COSP6SMITI row iswerry4 4 4414 M. 1144s4.1 4.441 4.4. Psi /Pi* trs:Toitt =sr' itikoisamosms ■ 5 IL EXISTING CONDITIONS MEI staff has reviewed the operation of intersections surrounding the project site Meetings with City and ODOT staffs indicated that the analysis should focus of the following impact area and transportation issues: 72nd Avenue at Durham Road intersection 72nd Avenue site access 72nd /Bridgeport and Lower Boones Ferry Road intersection 1 -5 southbound and Lower Boones Ferry Road intersection Lower Boones Ferry interchange signal progression (ramps and 72nd) The Lower Boones Ferry Road section under and adjacent to 1 -5 was widened within the past two years. This work also included improvements to the southbound 1 -5 offramp. Bridgeport Road is striped for two -way single lane channellzation. At the approach to 72nd Avenue, however, the eastbound approach lane is 24' wide. MEI has observed motorists utilizing the extra width to create two approach lanes at the traffic signal. This has allowed eastbound motorists to directionally sort west of 72nd Avenue and also has allowed more vehicles through the signal during its allotted green light Interval. The south approach of Lower Boones Ferry Road provides a separate right turn lane and a shared Ieft- through lane. Northbound and southbound traffic are separated by a striped median, which further south serves left turns into the Tri -Met park and ride south lot. The north approach provides one northbound lane and two southbound lanes channellzed to provide a shared Ieft - through lane (defecto left lane) and a shared through -right lane. Further to the north, 72nd Avenue is configured as a two lane facility with curb to curb width adequate for a center left turn refuge. A Ieft turn storage lane is provided at the 72nd Avenue intersection with Durham Road. The recently constructed intersection and traffic signal is constructed with 3 -lane approaches on the north, south and west sides. Traffic signal equipment was designed with the expectation of developing an east approach to serve the subject parcel. EXISTING TRAFFIC: PM peak hour traffic counts were taken by MEI staff during the months of July and August, 1893, from 3,00 PM to 8 :00 PM. The critical PM peak hour was determined to be the controlling design period due to the combination of peak existing volumes with peak site generated volumes. Specifically, the peak 15 minutes of operation will be from 4 :15 to 4 :30 PM. This period experiences the highest traffic volumes for critical lane groups and turning movements. It will also be the period when average weekday site generated traffic Is at its maximum. P : \WPDA'tA\SP8CS \TS\Y3O37.O1 \23T5 i .ks a� a 141. . rn j.~ User survey data from a retail facility comparable to that proposed has been provided by the design team and reviewed by MEI. The peak hour of weekday traffic was found to be from 3:00 to 4:00 PM, with site traffic dropping only 1% during the critical 4:00 to 5:00 PM period corresponding to the intersection's peak period. Site generated traffic from 5:00 to 6:00 PM is approximately 13% less than during the peak hour of 3:00 to 4:00 PM. This analysis is based upon evaluation of the worst 15 minutes of operation for the intersection. The intersection of 72nd Avenue and Bridgeport /Lower Boones Ferry Road was also counted during the AM peak hour for evaluation of operational capability with proposed mitigative improvements. It has been determined that the AM peak hour is considerably less critical than during the PM peak. Figure 2 provides a summary of the existing 1393 PM peak hour traffic volumes. BACKGROUND GROWTH: A comparison was made of traffic volumes counted in 1993 and volumes counted in 1990 when analysis was undertaken to evaluate the effects of a zone change to allow retail development. Traffic volumes have Increased by approximately 30 %, equivalent to a yearly growth rate of 9.5 %. Traffic growth has been generated by development of properties in Tigard and Tualatin as well as completion of the Durham Road extension. This analysis addresses growth of background traffic over a one year period, assuming occupancy of the proposed retail development in 1994. IN- PROCESS TRAFFIC: In- process traffic is traffic generated by projects which have been approved through the City land use approval process, but which are not yet generating full- buildout traffic volumes: No "In- Process" projects were identified by the City of Tigard which would have significant impact on traffic volumes at this intersection. r.\WPDATA \SPECS \rs`9 r,O1\23tS1.k3 3 • b '`n 41� Q, • ,tm .0t .b,•" . a, T 1 : FUTURE CONDITIONS During the 1990 review of traffic conditions in the Lower Boones Ferry corridor, it was agreed by all interested parties, including County, Cities, COOT, and private property owners, that the long term solution to the capacity and safety problems experienced at Lower Boones /72nd will likely require relocation of the intersection to the west. Four alternatives were addressed at that time, including estimated construction costs. With the minimum construction cost at approximately $1,000,000.00, it was evident that a multi - source funding mechanism would be required to accomplish the work. Also the alteration in traffic flow could impact surrounding properties, which would require considerable planning. At that time, involved parties agreed in principle that }' ys would be a potential long- term solution to an ongoing problem. Any improvements nade to "fix" the 72nd /Bridgeport intersection would still bo hampered by the 140' of available eastbound and westbound queuing between 72nd Avenue and the 1-5 southbound ramp. The best improvement possible, without intersection relocation, will be to improve operational safety and capacity within the existing constraints of right -of -way and intersection spacing. PAWPIDATA \SPECS \TS\ 8037'.oi \281'89.4$ 4 • no • • r Ii h. r t IV. PEDESTRIAN AND TRANSIT SERVICES PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FACILITIES: The pedestrian circulation needs in the vicinity of the north and south Tri -Met park and ride lots are currently met with signalized and fully actuated crosswalks across the north, west, and south approaches of the 1 -5 southbound offramp and crosswalks across the east, west, and north approaches of the 72nd /Bridgeport intersection. The existence of the east crosswalk at the 72nd /Bridgeport /Lower Boones Ferry intersection has precluded development of dual northbound right turn lanes and /or dual southbound to eastbound left turn lanes. This has contributed to the intersection capacity deficiencies experienced to date. Sidewalks have been constructed on the Tri -Met park and ride facilities street frontages. No sidewalks exist on the west side of 72nd Avenue nor on the east side along the subject property's frontage. A bike lane is marked on the west side of Lower Boones Ferry Road south o`t Bridgeport Road. Tri -Met commuter vehicles have continued to park on the roadway shoulder and bike lane, in spite of the newly constructed Tri -Met north parking lot. The north lot is frequently not filled while the roadway shoulder is fully parked. This tendency reflects the pickup location for Tri -Met inbound (to Portland) traffic which is provided only at the south lot MASS - TRANSIT AVAILABILITY; The Tri -Met park and ride lot at 72nd Avenue and Lower Boones serves bus traffic 7 days a week from early morning until late evening. During commute periods, bus frequency and ridership both increase. Currently, inbound traffic to Portland) is only picked up at the south lot, requiring motorists parking in the north lot to walk across Lower Boones Ferry Road. Outbound (from Portland) bus service stops at both the north and south lots. Because of this, there is very little pedestrian crossing activity between the north and south park and ride lots during the afternoon. MEI has discussed with Tri -Met staff the concept of rerouting Inbound buses to 72nd Avenue northbound, accessing 1 -5 via Carman Drive (Upper Booties Ferry Road) instead of the current direct route to 1 -5 northbound at the Lower Boones Ferry interchange. This would allow riders to be picked up at the north lot, and the crosswalk on the east side of 72nd Avenue to be eliminated, thereby greatly improving the operational capacity of the 72nd /Boones Ferry Road and Boones Ferry Road ramp terminal intersections. Tri -Met's operations staff has indio'::ted that this rerouting is not acceptable, even with the added incentive of potentially 100 parking spaces in the site development being assigned for joint use with Park and Ride users, t \WP DATA\ S P EC s \T S\93017, 01 \23i S 1. k s 5 • ti V. SITE TRIP GENERATION Trip generation calculations have been prepared utilizing the 5th Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip Generati©n __Manual. The trip volumes calculated were compared against average weekday traffic data from a similar retail facility in the Seattle area. The survey data summarized a two week period of cash register transactions. It is expected that the assumption of one transaction equal to one inbound and one outbound vehicle trip is slightly conservative since it does not give credit to walk -in customers, transit customers, and multiple purchasers from the same vehicle trip. With the assumption of one transaction yielding one inbound and one outbound trip, correlation with ITE projections for Shopping Center use is very high. Average Daily Weekday Traffic correlation is 98%, while the PM peak hour correlation is 96 %. In both cases, the ITE projection is slightly higher than the trips projected based upon the transaction survey data. This results in a slightly conservative trip generation. Following is a sumnnary of ITE trip projections for the 68,000 square foot building: TOTAL NEW PASS-BY DIVERTED 65% 25% 10% Average Daily Traffic 5554 VPD 3610 1388 556 AM Peak Hour Traffic Enter 82 VPH 53 21 8 Exit 47 VPH 31 12 4 PM Peak Hour Traffic Enter 294 VPH 191 73 30 Exit 294 VPH 191 73 30 Vehicle trips generated by retail business tend to attract their clientele, and traffic, from traffic already travelling in the area of the development. These motorists are already travelling from an origin to a destination, such as work to home, or to another retail service provider. The ITE has compiled surveys frorn a variety of retail uses including size of facility, type of facility, and character of surrounding roadways to determine the estimated number of trips to the facility which are "New" trips, "Pass -By trips, or "Diverted -Link Trips." New trips are vehicle tf ips for clientele who create a trip to the store because of the goods or services provided by this particular facility. These people would not be making a retail - only destined vehicular trip were it not for the devdoprnent of this particular retail establishment. F,V ID/WA \sPscs- TS\9 7,01 \231'81,ks „ * „ • Jv n • •;,;*. * ' '1' v Pass-By trips are created when motorists are travelling past the site as an element of a separate origin to destination trip. This may be a work to home trip or it may be a home to • retail trip where this store creates either a new retail stop en route or replaces an existing • retail destination. Pass-By trips are considered as traffic diverted from an adjacent roadway or adjacent intersection such as 72nd/Bridgeport. This results in a reallocation of existing traffic to other intersection turning movements which in some cases relieves traffic • congestion by shifting traffic from critical movements to higher capacity movements. The full impact of the traffic volume is felt at the site accesses. • Diverted-Link trips are similar in description to Pass-By trips except that they must utilize a separate roadway link to access the site. For the purposes of this analysis, Diverted-Link traffic is expected to be diverted from 1-5 and from Upper Boones Ferry Road. FAWftATA\ SPECSVS\ 93037.01 \23T61,ks 7 , • h x 4 Vi TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT Trip distribution assumptions for the three different trip types discussed in the previous section of the report were made based upon existing traffic patterns and anticipated market area. Distribution of New Trips is predominantly based upon market area analysis. Distribution of Pass -By and Diverted -Link traffic is based upon market area, alternate retail opportunities location, and density of traffic volume in the surrounding area. The graphics attached to this report illustrate the general and specific distribution of traffic to intersection movements. Trip assignment graphics combine the specific trip distribution percentages and the trip generation estimates presented earlier. Following is a list of the distribution and assignment graphics: Figure 3A Figure 3B Figure 30 Figure 4A Figure 4B Figure 40 Figure 5A Figure 5B Figure 5C Trip Distribution: Trip Distribution: Trip Assignment Trip Distribution: Trip Distribution: Trip Assignment: Trip Distribution: Trip Distribution: Trip Assignment: F:\WF AMA \SPECS \TS\9 7101 \23tS1,ko New Trips (General) New Trips (Specific) New Trips Pass -By Trips (General) Pass -By Trips (Specific) Pass -By Trips Diverted Link Trips (General) Diverted Link Trips (Specific) Diverted Link Trips 8 4t- • .1 el 1 s c`. rl n 0. 4. VII. WARRANT ANALYSIS SICNALIZATION WARRANTS: Signal warrants were reviewed in a manner consistent with the I ii . In lnito Tr.: Control Devices. Calculations are available in the Appendix of this report. The analysis utilizes 100% warrants since posted and 85th percentile speeds are less than 40 mph. The only unsignalized intersection within the study area is the new site access to 72nd Avenue. Irrespective of signal warrant status, it would not be in the best interest of the travelling public to serve this site with two traffic signals, since its traffic generation can easily be accommodated with only one signalized access. Signalized access is available opposite Durham. Road. Though somewhat circuitous for left turn egress from the site, it will provide exiting motorists a reliable protected means of egress. The review of signal warrants indicates that no signal warrants will be met at the unsignalized access location. PAWPDATA\SPscssjs %so l \g31`s1tits I \ A VIII INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS The review of intersection capacity utilizes the methods presented in the .1935_1142/By ,._._, a IVi nugLacacialligaga2D9 NCAP software was utilized to prepare capacity and level of service computations, copic.. of which are available in the Appendix. The concept of level of service has been developed by traffic engineers to allow a qualitative measure of an intersection's operation. A level of service "A" is representative of generally free - flowing conditions while a level of service "F" is representative of excessive delays. For signalized operation, level of service is based upon average delay incurred by all vehicles utilizing the intersection during the peak 15 minutes of the design hour. For unsignaiized operation, correlation to average delay is not currently utilized; rather, evaluation of level of service is typically based upon an estimate of available gaps in opposing traffic for permissive intersection movements. This measure is referred to as "reserve capacity," In general, operation of a sidestreet's left turn is utilized for determination of an intersection's level of service since it is the most impeded movement through the intersection. Frequently this proves to be a poor indicator of the overall intersection's operation since other movements carrying the majority of traffic operate at a much higher level of service and capacity. The Appendix of this report contains qualitative and quantitative descriptions of level of service for both signalized and signalized intersections. Figure 6 illustrates combined traffic volumes. The resulting levels of service and capacity are presented in the following tables: WPOATA\SP5CS\rs \9 7,ai\ TS1.i a 10 ( TABLE 1 LEVEL OF SERVICE AND CAPACITY ANALYSIS LEFT RIGHT LEFT CYCLE AVG, ILITER E T) N MI R M1NQR MA. LEN 'T LAY V EXISTING CONDITIONS 72nd and Durham Rd. 72nd and Site Access MO. M -A wM71 72nd /Bridgeport and Boones Lower Boones and 1 -5 SB EXISTING VOL. WITH MITIGATION 72nd and Durham Rd. 72nd and Site Access 72nd /Bridgeport and Boones Lower Boones and 1-5 SB COMBINED VOL. WITH MITIGATION 60 9.0" 0.45 B 76 >60" 1,17 F 76 15.5" 0.71 C 60 9.0" 0.45 B 76 14.0" 0.57 C 76 13.2" 0.71 B 72nd and Durham Rd. 60 11.2" 0.52 B 72nd and Site Access D(165) A(686) A(698) 72nd /Bridgeport and Boones 76 20.9" 0.71 0 Lower Boones and 1 -5 SB 76 15.2" 0.77 0 Unsignalized operation results denote the level of service for each movement and the reserve capacity available. Based upon these results, it is apparent that all intersections except 72nd /Bridgeport will operate acceptably with the proposed project's traffic. The intersection analysis for 72nd /Bridgeport is complex due to i ;s relationship with the coordinated signal operation of the corridor, the 140' storage refuge for eastbound traffic west of the southbound ramp terminal, and the issue of pedestrian crossing crncerns. P:\WPbATA\sPtOS\TS\9 031,O1 \231'81.kts 11 • n • • , • ,e,.7; • IX. VEHICULAR STORAGE REQUIREMENTS • ME1's level of service and capacity analysis results were utilized to evaluate required vehicular queuing lengths. The calculations utilize a peaking factor or surge factor of 1.5. Traffic counts provided by MEI for study area intersections indicated a peak hour factor (ratio of peak 15 minutes to peak hour) of approximately 0.90. This relates to a surge factor of 1.09. Thus, the storage calculations relate to the peak queue anticipated during the average weekday's operation. Following is a summary of the queuing analysis results: INTERSECTION APPROACH MOVEMENT REQUIRED LENGTH (ft.) 72nd © Durham NB TH 75 NB LT 95 72nd © Site SB LT 50 72nd © Boones SB* LT 185/160 NB* RT 315/220 NB** RT 325 ** Dual Turn Lanes Existing Conditions The following graphic illustrates eastbound vehicular queuing within the 140 I available at the 1-5 southbound Intersection. This graphic depicts the results of movernet It re-prioritization to allow filling of available space with vehicles from eastbound Bridgeport first, southbound 72nd Avenue second, and northbound to eastbound Boones Ferry third. This would result in vehicular queuing in the safest manner possible, by storing excess vehicles on the northbound approach where they would not impede opposing intersection traffic. P:\WPDATASP$C8\TS\93037,01\23151„ks 12 . ' 1 Jr • 1= =1 MED =1 ECM =g gle Tuvr, Queej 869 �� -7G \xr.5 Z3 ve��cvc�e `SZ Ve.k+c..Ies -Cyorel 721^ 1 s, a. Veh i c,le ro > &viIj e rt E. E. J 1. ��•�...� Ve (m &boe r.+ MI IVIACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED CIVIL a STRUCTURAL m TRANSPORTATION 0050 SW BANCROFT STREET 3 IBC, E3OX 69039 PORTLAND. OREGON 07201.0030 • (503) 224.9560 • FAX (503) 225.1255 DATE .. 4 JOB NO. .: -''"1-#* -L SHT. —44.-4-4, OR IACKENZIE , . ... ENG NEEAING INcOPfPORATEt'b (so MS All glKKNt6 nESEHHVED • { JIIM LEE =SI =SI offniTEIJ ffsETE:t—srEtt" Thfairraft R-\\TEciffs MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED CIVIL • STRUCTURAL a TRANSPORTATION 0690 SW. SANCROFT STREET • Pl SOX 69039 PORTLAND. OREGON 91201 -0039 • (5031 224.9560 + PAX (503) 228.1295 SHT.... -., OP MACKENZIE ENGINEVIINCI 11193 ALL f GHTli hEBEf Ep COFIPfJIi/1TEf� ' n•t coLLLDi DRI6Ww1 IT10- SRI% 1 tICCIDetJi 801414411V1) TYP6 wattgy P Do 01-14/... LEpr TUN 3 3 G kali? 51\13) 1 2 3 51DL: 5606 0 i I TOTAI- ME R.,) -in 'hoc; 'P K 1JD it MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • TRANSPORTATION 0690 SW. BANCROFT STREET • PO, BOX 69039 PORTLAND. OREGON 97201-0039 * (503) 224,9560 � FAX (503) 2281285 magreausorkiweenmasiumassoormmoommorroram By STI1 DATE Ct 10'13 JOB NO 23037 SHT. OP © MACKENZIE ENGINEERINCI INCORPORATED ,s10, 1993 AU FIG'S RESERVED ? • G lt•, X. 72ND AND BRiDGEPORTi MITIGATION Currently, the operation of this intersection is impaired at various times of the day due to congestion created by cars forcing their way into the 140' eastbound refuge between the intersections. MEI has observed the operation of the intersection with respect to the ramp signal and corridor timing and noted some consistent operational patterns. A diagram of ODOT's current operational phase relationships is shown in Figure 7A. MEI`s proposed revision to phase sequencing and timing revisions follows the ODOT diagram as Figure 7B, SIGNAL SEQUENCE: Westbound traffic from east of the 1 -5 structure generally clears the 72nd /Bridgeport intersection without stopping, except for some trailing vehicles coming off of the 1-5 northbound offramp. 1 -5 southbound traffic turning westbound currently arrives on a red signal and queues to await a green, Upon termination of green for eastbound traffic at the southbound ramp signal, the eastbound refuge is always cleared. The 72nd /Bridgeport signal then follows in sequence with release of Bridgeport Road eastbound traffic. These vehicles arrive on a red signal at the ramp, queuing typically 2 to 0 vehicles deep in the empty eastbound through lanes. During their yellow clearance, northbound right turns begin on a red signal to fill the remaining portion of the 140' refuge. The 72nd /Bridgeport signal follows in sequence with the common northbound and southbound phase. The heavy northbound right turn volume fills the remaining spaces within the 140' refuge, typically with cars angling across lanes and driving over the southeast curb to fill Ir nes. During this interval, southbound left turn vehicles either wedge into the eastbound refuge, partially blocking westbound lanes, or are stranded In the intersection when their light goes to red while northbound traffic is still receiving a green. This results in a classic left turn trap conflict ,similar to that experienced with lagging a protected left turn phase in protective- permissive operation. The southbound motorist, upon observing a yellow light, typically expects t. northbound motorists to also be receiving a yellow light and thus be stopping. Instead, northbound right turn traffic continues on a green overlap phase with the onset of westbound tr <affic. This has resulted in an unsafe operation during peak periods of the day. A collision diagram has been prepared and is included in the Appendix. It reflects an accident history which relates to this left -turn conflict. Figure it illustrates a phasing revision proposed which would allow westbound through and right -turn traffic to operate concurrent with the eastbound (Bridgeport) signal phase. This will significantly benefit westbound operation and reduce queuing while not significantly Impacting the eastbound phase due to its very low left turn volume, F \ WPbATA \SP8CS\TS\03O3i,O1 \23i"S1,ks 13 a C ASSESSMENT OF ISSUES AND MITIGATION: MEI's analysis of current operation indicates three primary problems: A. Eastbound storage provides only 140' of storage in two through lanes B. The limited amount of storage space is consumed in the following sequence: 1. Eastbound Bridgeport traffic 2. Northbound right turn traffic S. Southbound left turn traffic C. Sorting of eastbound vehicles from northbound and southbound is occurring in a very short distance, resulting in cars stopped while angled across lanes. As discussed in the introduction of this report, the only possible method of improving the first problem is relocation of the intersection. It has already been established that this will require a concerted effort by multiple jurisdictions, and will also require considerable time to accomplish. The number of vehicles in the peak hour travelling eastbound from Bridgeport Road and southbound to eastbound from 72nd Avenue could be safely stored within the available 1400 storage space. The problem is that northbound right turn volume currently is ranked hianer on the service priority sequence. This is a result of the common northbound and southbound signal phase, which is currently required because of the need to serve the eastside pedestrian crosswalk timing. Therefore, if the pedestrian crossing could be removed, the condition could be greatly improved. The pedestrian crossing of the east approach requires 28" of green time concurrent with the northbound and southbound signal phase. This has a significant impact on intersection capacity and frequently results in a pedestrian having to weave among diagonally staged northbound right turn vehicles, while other vehicles are awaiting queuing locations. The primary alternatives which include removal of this crosswalk require use of the existing crosswalk 1400 to the east at the 1 -5 southbound ramp, or construction of a pedestrian overcrossing, Removal of the crosswalk would allow construction of dual northbound right turn lanes and dual southbound left-turn lanes by eliminating the need for the common northbound and southbound signal phase. Dual turn lanes will not only increase capacity, but also have the benefit of allowing vehicles to directionally sort upon approach to the 72nd /Bridgeport intersection rather than In the 140' refuge area. This would considerably reduce lane crossing in the eastbound refuge area, Advance signing would Instruct motorists to use the appropriate approach lanes for 1 -5 southbound and Boones Ferry eastbound. 14 .01 • 0; The three key elements critical to substantial improvement of the intersection are removal of the crosswalk, construction of dual turn lanes, and control of northbound right turn traffic to avoid filling the available storage space ahead of southbound left turn volume. It is critical that safety be the first priority of the intersection. As such, the top two priority movements into the 140' refuge must be eastbound Bridgeport and southbound 72nd left turns since these two movements, when not adequately served, cause queuing inside the intersection which obstructs the westbound flow of traffic. Adequate space is provided within the 140' to store the volume from these two movements, when prioritization of movements is accomplished. The northbound right -turn traffic should be restricted to not allow right turns on red. The lost capacity from restricting right turns on red is compensated for by the increase in capacity created by dual turn lanes and the removal of pedestrian crossing. Figure SA illustrates the existing 72nd /Bridgeport configuration while Figure 8B depicts the possible improvements. P :\Wt BATA \SPECS\"PS`93037.01 \23TSi,ks • 15 ay _ �0 XI. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS MEI's review of the traffic impacts generated by the proposed 68,000 square foot retail development indicates that the roadway system can accommodate site trstffic, with implementation of short-term and long -term improvements to the 72nd /Bridgeport intersection. Site access can be adequately provided with access to the 72nd /Durham Road traffic signal through construction of an east signal approach. The site should also be provided with a full movement unsignalized access onto 72nd Avenue approximately 400' south of the northbound stopline at Durham Road. Left turn queuing requires 75' maximum for left turns into the unsignalized access, and 95' for northbound left turns into Durham Road. As Durham Road utilization increases, available storage is provided to serve a peak of 6 to 7 vehicles. This is approximately double the required storage upon opening of the proposed retail facility. Improvement of the 72nd /Bridgeport intersection has been discussed during several meetings with MEI, (DOT', Washington County, and Tri -Met. The City of Tigard has participated through review of the draft of this report and via telephone conversations. These discussions have indicated agreement that: 1. The intersection has been a problem for some time; 2. Many jurisdictions and property owners have an interest in its improvement; 3. The "ultimate" solution is so costly that no single entity can be responsible for its cost; 4. Money should not be spent on short -term improvements that cannot be built into a long -term solution; 5. All entities should carry a reasonable burden for the solution. There is a range of choices for specific improvement to the intersection, related to the current land development application, as follows: Conclude that there is no viable alternative and do nothing; 2. Conclude that there is no reasonable short -term work that is cost effective, but require that the project place a sum of money in a fund for future intersection work; 3. Execute as much improvement as possible by altering signal phasing and improving signage, but without altering the pedestrian circulation system; 4. Complete the signal alterations and pedestrian access changes to allow a split phase operation with dual left -turn lanes. Option (1) is not responsible, since there is an acknowledged safety concern at this time. Option (2) was suggested by Washington County, and also was actually discussed in the zone change proceeding several years ago. If chosen, a reasonable rate of participation based on traffic impact would be determined, then applied to an estimate of cost to improve the intersection. The negative aspect of this is that no actual improvement will occur in the short term, and there Is no guarantee that sufficient funds will be available in any given time frame. F : \WPDATA \SPECS \TS \93037',01 \23T51.ks .f• Option (3) is the most realistic to achieve, but would not achieve an acceptable level of service for southbound traffic. However, it will not disrupt the existing pedestrian system between the Park and Ride lots, which is a paramount concern of Tri -Met. Option (4) would achieve a significant level of traffic improvement, although possibly with a less convenient pedestrian access to the transit facility. It also has a cost likely in excess of $250,000, which is beyond the capability of any single entity, but would achieve a level of service acceptable for development of the Bingham site. This report therefore recommends that the Bingham site development be responsible for signal operations improvements at the intersection of 72nd and Bridgeport Road, including split phasing and pedestrian system changes (Figures 7B and 8B). A funding mechanism o allocate costs should i be arranged. A further possibility is the commitment of project - related TIF funds to the intersection improvement fund. Also, an on -going "committee" of jurisdictional representatives and property owners should be maintained to periodically review the intersection conditions and to look for opportunities to move further toward the long -term solution to traffic in the area. `wPDATA \SPEC8V8\931. :7.01 \23-rt 1 *k$ 17 - CAPACITY CALCULATIONS WARRANT CALCULATIONS - QUEUING CALCULATIONS - ACCIDENT DIAGRAM 111 4 rAWPCiATASPECSVS\93031,01 \23TSI.ks LEGEND 0 wir C1 d1 aYy Aos Atal) TotA1 fit/004 mint 0,244 4 ttIezivdc ravaws 00604 iikuira o 344 (3 ►+r ib00 OF) Pommes Thad! 354 (al IboG as 04 1g 3031 FIGURE 1 •'r 4 Ni •v, FIGURE .r.i.wYww.��W�rr.r�:v ar+„rrwrr �•rr,��rrrr -Jr- — Jr 1 ..X 15T"1NO I M Pe./cK HOUR 1993 8 North DATE JULY 1175 Jb13 N1 2g8__ __ 1 • DURHAM RD 2 5,/ FIGUR 3A r a) 1 ) 1 ...._0' 1,..... -7 ie --,. •-- ^ -.--20 "7 --a, t ,.•- -- 25 @ ‘:\rj) it ° f ti. FIGLR ree 36 TRIP b15TiIaJTIoN N EW TrZ I PS B,r M DATE JULY M .pan Nei. 2/3037,01 'ON gOr 51)1/1 Aln.r 31va Aa dLL NN LNkNY c1181. TRIP /STRIL.0770N PASS -5Y TRIPS (215 Ve; 517`Ergt Ps) FIGUR wao Mai 4C TRIP A GNHE17' pP S S Y •T P$ 4.......... Y.. ed.__ ,r.•*.....omurte,.mstrer4 73 VPH ENTEP, 13 'vPH BY -111:1Earzi DATE ..TULY 19'3 Jt13 Ntt. ,2180_41 DURHAM RD TF D15TPJBU iON DIVERTED LINK - C fly JOB NEL 1901.0E FIGURE 69 1773 Cot-031MED -TRArla , . I 4 12 ” /6" A ---- *art , .4\ FIGURE 7B a • • !, MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED CIVIL • STRUCTURAL * TRANSPORTATION 0690 SW. EANCROri STREET • PO. nx 69039 PORTLANO, OREGON 97201-0039 • (503) 224-9560 • PAX (503) 228 • X • 33" tomorrow.....0 kt 11. 4i . • • 1,0 p. TRIMET PARK AND RIDE --74.--------------- _ _ ....- , 'VP —,... -----_-... S.W. 72ND AVE. n TRIMET PARK AND RIDE . 0.0.01111, MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATInD --rmo SW BANCROFT ST. PORTLAND, OREGON (03) P.24-9570 PO BOX 69039 FAX (508) 228.1285 • ". • VILLAGE INN 4do •• ARK AND RIDE MEI 2.130.31,0/ North FIGURE 8A EXISTING CONFIGURATION • • , • TRINMT PARK AND FIDE 1 H co 4.1 ••9 • 0 - PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE ' TRIMET PARK AND RIDE t.t■• 1.0 .1101.01101.•■■711.0.111.11.Y...11.nn.“01•111.1.110111.1M11110•10.Mam S.W. 72ND AVE. MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATZ,0 0690 SW BANCSOFt 81". POPTLANO, ()HEWN (5O) 224-9570 PO 130X 69039 PAX (50 228.1285 . — • H; - PARKING PROHISITED,•---, VILLAGE INN r MET PARK AND RIDE . . " PARKING PROMIBITED-....-....>1 *21U)37,01 FIGURE 813 PROPOSED CHANNELIZAT1ON •.4 :• t ' COMBINED TRAFFIC VOLUMES EXISTING GEOMETRY AND PHASING • . e . • . HM: SIGNALIZED INTERL .YrION SUMMARY Version 2k 01-11-1996 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W) Boones Ferry Rd (N-S) 72nd Ave. Analyst: KNI File Name: CAMC.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-11-96 AM PEAK Comment: COMBINED TRAFFIC - EXISTING GEOMETRY No. Lanes Volumes Lane Width RTOR Vols Lost Time Eastbound L T R >2 < 16 224 5 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Westbound L T R imorro■ *4.0.0 - - 2 1 1 488 250 763 12.0 12.0 12.0 229 3.00 3.00 3.00 Northbound L T R >1 1 2 117 436 12.0 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Southbound L T R 1 1 < 243 44 9 12.0 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds Peds * WB Left * SB Left * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds * Peds * NB Right * EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 34.0A 13.0A Green 17.0A Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 Cycle Length: 76 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS EB LTR 689 3739 0.409 0.184 17.9 C 17.9 C WB L 1630 3539 0.339 0.461 8,5 B 10.6 B T 858 1863 0.321 0.461 8.4 B P. 729 1583 0.804 0.461 13.7 B NB LT 424 1789 0.309 0.237 15.6 C 5.4 B v. 1123 1524 0.427 0.737 2.6 A SB L 256 1083 1.041 0.237 74.8 F 64.1 F TR 422 1780 0.138 0.237 14.8 B Intersection Delay = 16.8 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C Lost Time/Cycle, L . 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.785 • • • • • • • • • ••• • •,' " • • HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERL,CTION SUMMARY Version Center For Microcomputers In Transportation 01-11-1996 Streets: (E-W) Boones Ferry Rd (N-S) 72nd Ave. Analyst: KNK Vile Name: CPMC.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-11-96 PM PEAK Comment: COMBINED TRAFFIC - EXISTING GEOMETRY Eastbound L T R No. Lanes > 2 < Volumes 29 488 2 Lane Width 12.0 RTOR Vols 0 Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 Westbound Northbound L TR L TR 2 1 1 >1 1 434 295 346 4 82 536 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 70 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Southbound L T R 1 1 < 421 168 75 12.0 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BB Left * NB Left * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds * Peds * WB Left * SB Lett * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds * Peds * NB Right * EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 34.0A 13.0A Green 17.0A Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 Cycle Length: 76 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS BB LTR 691 3752 0.857 0.184 26.7 D 26.7 D WE L 1614 3505 0.301 0.461 8.3 B 8.6 B T 850 1845 0.378 0.461 8.7 B R 722 1568 0.415 0.461 9.0 B NB LT 425 1794 0.219 0.237 15.1 C 4.7 A R 1155 1568 0.505 0.737 3.0 A SB L 307 1295 1.493 0.237 * * * * TR 413 1742 0.642 0.237 19.2 C Intersection Delay = * (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = * (g/C)*(V/c) is greater than one. Calculation of Dl is infeasable. • ITCM: SIGNALIZED INTEA, ,CTION SUMMARY Version 2. Center For Microcomputers In Transportation 01-11-1996 Streets: (E-W) BOONES FERRY RD (N-S) 1-5 SB RAMP Analyst: KNK File Name: DAMC.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-11-96 AM PEAK Comment: COMBINED TRAFFIC-EXISTING GEOMETRY. No. Lanes Volumes Lane Width RTOR Vols Lost Time Eastbound L T R 2 1 617 259 12.3 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 We L T R 2 2 440 1018 13.3 12.3 111 3.00 3.00 Northbound L T R Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 EB Left NB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right. Peds * Peds WB Left * SB Left Thru * * Thru Right Right Peds * * Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 20.OA 24.0A Green 20.OA Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 Cycle Length: 76 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 Southbound L T R 1 >1 1 417 1 440 12.3 12.3 13.3 130 3.00 3.00 3.00 5 6 * * * 7 8 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Mvmts Cap Plow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS EB T 1202 R 506 WB L 101C T 2402 SB L 489 3655 1538 3657 3726 1770 0,592 0.563 0.494 0.489 0.468 0.329 0.329 0.276 0.645 0.276 r ■ r r 14.3 14.7 15.2 4.7 15.3 Approach: Delay LOS B 14.4 B C 7.8 A C 17.8 LT 490 1775 0.469 0.276 15.3 C R 452 1636 0.754 0.276 21.1 C Intersection Delay = 12.0 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) . 0.612 • • 1 . , 4 ") HCM: SIGNALIZED INTER L JTION SUMMARY Version 2.„ 01-11-1996 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W) BOONES FERRY RD (N-S) 1-5 RAMP Analyst: KNK File Name: DPMC.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-11-96 PM PEAK Comment: COMBINED TRAFFIC - EXISTING GEOMETRY No. Lanes Volumes Lane Width RTOR Vols Lost Time Eastbound L T R 2 1 1017 369 12.3 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 Westbound L T R 2 2 549 630 13.3 12.3 111 3.00 3.00 Northbound L T R Southbound L T R 1 >1 1 745 10 377 12.3 12.3 13.3 110 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds * Peds WB Left * 813 Left * Thru * * Thru * Right Right * Peds * * Peds * NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 20.OP 24.0P Green 20.OP Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 Cycle Length: 76 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS EB T 1250 3800 0.900 0.329 25.0 C 24.0 R 526 1599 0.738 0.329 20.9 C WB L 1020 3693 0.583 0.276 18.7 C 11.0 T 2426 3763 0.287 0.645 4.5 A SB L 494 1787 0.810 0.276 26.3 D 24.4 LT 496 1794 0.797 0.276 25.5 D R 456 1652 0.616 0.276 20.0 C Intersection l'elay . 19.8 sec/veh Intersection LOS Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.772 4.4 •• n <1 Ilk • A • •• HCM: SIGNALIZED INTER ,CTION SUMMARY Version 2 01-11-1996 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W) BOONES FERRY RD (N-S) I-5 NB RAMP Analyst: KNK File Name: EAMC.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-11-96 AM PEAK Comment: COMBINED TRAFFIC-EXISTING GEOMETRY. No. Lanes Volumes Lane Width ROTOR Vols Lost Time Eastbound L T R 1 2 244 790 12.0 12.3 3.00 3.00 0 Westbound L T R Northbound L T R 0004.0..... 2 >1 1 885 575 1 559 12.3 12.0 12.0 0 200 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Southbound L T R Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left * Thru * * Thru * Right Right * Peas * Peds * WE Left SB Left Thru * Thru Right Right Peds * * Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WE Right Green 24.0A 20.OA Green 20.OA Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 Cycle Length: 76 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #2 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS EB L 571 1736 0,497 0.329 13.8 B 6.4 B T 2379 3690 0.406 0.645 4.3 A WE T 1030 3726 1.049 0.276 53.1 E 53.1 8 NB LT 490 1774 1.367 0.276 * * * * R 437 1583 0,953 0.276 40.4 t Intersection Delay . * (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = * (g/C)*(V/c) is greater than one. Calculation of D1 is infeasable. • y• • b • HCM: SIGNALIZED INTER ,CTION SUMMARY Version 2. 01-11-1996 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W) BOONES FERRY RD (N-S) 1-5 NB RAMP Analyst: KNK File Name: EPMC.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-11-96 PM PEAK Comment: COMBINED TRAFFIC-EXISTING GEOMETRY, Eastbound L T R No. Lanes 1 2 Volumes 429 1333 Lane Width 12.0 12.3 RTOR Vols Lost Time .3.00 3.00 0 Westbound L T R 2 860 12.3 3.00 Northbound L T R 4* •nn ••■ >1 1 318 1 514 12.0 12.0 200 3.00 3.00 3.00 Southbound L T R aul .n4 lo• Inn• Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left * Thru * * Thru * Right Right * Peds * * Peds * WB Left SB Left Thru * Thru Right Right Peds * Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WE Right Green 24,0A 20.OA Green 20.OA Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 Cycle Length: 76 secs Phase combinatlon order: #1 #5 #2 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ..... EB L 571 1736 0.807 0.329 20.9 C 9.2 B T 2379 3690 0.633 0.645 5.6 B WB T 1080 2726 0.943 0.276 29.2 D 29.2 D NB LT 495 1792 0.693 0.276 18.8 C 20.2 C R 442 1599 0.765 0.276 21.7 C Intersection Delay = 16.6 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.837 44 COMBINED TRAFFIC VOLUMES PROPOSED GEOMETRY AND PHASING HCM: SIGNALIZED INTER, ,CTION SUMMARY Version 2, 01-11-1996 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W) Boones Ferry Rd (N-S) 72nd Ave. Analyst: KNK File Name: CAMNU.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-10-96 AM PEAK Comment: COMBINED TRAFFIC-PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. No, Lanes Volumes Lane Width RTOR Vols Lost Tine Eastbound L T R >2 < 16 224 5 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Westbound L T R 2 1 1 488 250 763 12.0 12.0 12.0 200 3.00 3.00 3.00 Northbound L T R >1 1 2 117 436 12.0 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Southbound L T R 2 1 < 243 44 9 12.0 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds Peds WB Left * SB Left * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds * * Peds * * NB Right * EB Right SB Right WB Right * Green 11.0A 23.0A Green 13,0A 13.0A Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 76 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6 #2 ........ Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS EB LTR 590 3739 0.478 0.158 19,3 C 19.3 C WB L 1118 3539 0.494 0.316 13.9 B 12.5 B T 588 1863 0.467 0.316 13.9 B R 854 1583 0.724 0,539 10.7 B NB LT 330 1791 0.397 0.184 18.1 C 11.8 B R 762 1524 0.629 0.500 10.1 B 812. L 639 3471 0.430 0.184 18.0 C 17.8 C TR 328 1780 0.177 0.184 16.9 C Intersection Delay = 13.8 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Ludt Time/Cycle, L = 9,0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.611 A • •. r r KM: SIGNALIZED INTER ,CTION SUMMARY Version 2. 01-11-1996 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation •.- Streets: (E-W) Boones Ferry Rd (N-S) 72nd Ave. Analyst: KNK File Name: CPMNU.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-10-96 PM PEAK Comment: COMBINED TRAFFIC-PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. No. Lanes Volumes Lane wieth RTOR Vols Lost Time Eastbound L T R >2 < 29 488 2 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Westbound L T R 2 1 1 434 295 346 12.0 12.0 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Northbound Southbound L T R >1 1 4 62 536 12.0 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 L T R 2 1 < 421 168 75 12.0 12,0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds Peds WB Left * SB Left * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds * * Peds * * NB Right * EB Right SB Right WB Right * Green 13.0A 19,0A Green 13.0A 15.0A Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 76 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6 #2 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS EB LTR 691 3752 0.857 0.184 26.7 D 26.7 D WB L 922 3505 0.527 0.263 15.9 C 14.4 8 T 486 1845 0.661 0.263 18.5 C R 763 1568 0.493 0.487 8.9 NB LT 388 1841 0.240 0.211 16.2 C 14.9 n a 743 1568 0.785 0.474 14.7 B SB L 639 3471 0.738 0.184 22.0 C 25.0 C TR 321 1742 0.826 0.184 30.3 D Intersection Delay = 19.2 sec/veh Intersection 1..3 = C Lost Time/Cycle, L . 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.810 Iv. HCM: SIGNALIZED INTER k :TION SUMMARY Version 2.( Center For Microcomputers In Transportation 01-11-1996 SI:reets: (E-W) BOONES FERRY RD (N-S) I-5 SB RAMP Analyst: KNK File Name: DAMC.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-11-96 AM PEAK Comment: COMBINED TRAFFIC-EXISTING GEOMETRY, No. Lanes Volumes Lane Width RTOR Vols Lost Time Eastbound L T R 2 1 617 259 12.3 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 Westbound L T R 2 2 440 1018 13.3 12.3 111 3.00 3.00 Northbound L T R Southbound L T R 1 >1 1 417 1 440 12.3 12.3 13.3 130 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BE Left NB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds * Peds WB Left * SB Left * Thru * * Thru * Right Right * Peds * * Peds * NB Right EB Right SB Right WE Right Green 20.OA 24.VA Green 20.OA Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 Cycle Length: 76 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS BB T 1202 3655 0.592 0.329 14.3 B 14.4 B R 506 1538 0.563 0.329 14.7 B WB L 1010 3657 0.494 0.276 15.2 C 7.8 B T 2402 3726 0.489 0.645 4.7 A SB L 489 1770 0.468 0.276 15.3 C 17.8 C LT 490 1775 0.469 0.276 15.3 C R 452 1636 0.754 0.276 21.1 C Intersection Delay = 12.0 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.612 IICM: SIGNALIZED INTER =ION SUMMARY Version 2L 01-11-1996 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W) BOONES FERRY RD (N-S) 1-5 RAMP Analyst: KNK File Name: DPMC.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-11-96 PM PEAK Comment: COMBINED TRAFFIC - EXISTING GEOMETRY No. Lanes Volumes Lane Width RTOR Vols Lost Time Eastbound L T R 2 1 1017 369 12.3 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 Westbound Northbound L T R L T R **** **** **** 2 2 549 630 13.3 12.3 111 3.00 3.00 Southbound L T A 1 >1 1 745 10 377 12.3 12.3 13.3 110 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds * Peds WB Left * SB Left * Thru * * Thru * Right Right * Peds * * Peds * NB Right EB Right SB Right WE Right Green 20.OP 24.0P Green 20.OP Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 Cycle Length: 76 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap 'Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS * * * * We * * EB T 1250 3800 0.900 0.329 25.0 C 24.0 C R 526 1599 0.738 0.329 20.9 C WE L 1020 3693 0.583 0.276 18.7 C 11.0 B T 2426 3783 0.287 0.645 4.5 A SB L 494 1787 0.810 0.276 26.3 D 24.4 C LT 496 1794 0.797 0.276 25.5 D R 456 1652 0.616 0.276 20.0 C Intersection Delay . 19.8 sec/voh Intersection LOS = C Lost Time/Cycle, L 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.772 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTER—CTION SUMMARY Version Center For Microcomputers In Transportation 01-11-1996 Streets: (E-W) BOONES FERRY RD (N-S) 1-5 NB RAMP Analyst: KNK File Name: EAMC.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-11-96 AM PEAK Comment: COMBINED TRAFFIC-EXISTING GEOMETRY. Eastbound L T R Westbound L T R Northbound L T R Southbound L T R No. Lanes Volumes Lane Width RTOR Vols Lost Time 1 2 244 790 12.0 12.3 3.00 3.00 2 885 12.3 >1 1 575 1 559 12.0 12.0 200 3.00 3.00 3.00 Phase Combination EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right SB Right Green Yellow/AR Cycle Length: Signal Operations 2 3 4 NB Left Thru Right Peds SB Left Thru Right Peds EB Right WB Right 24.0A 20.0A Green 20.0A 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 76 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #2 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c Flow Ratio Mvmts Cap g/C Approach: Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS EB L T WE T NB LT R (g/C)*(V/c) ....___ 571 1736 0.497 0.329 13.8 B 6.4 2379 3690 0.406 0.645 4.3 A 1030 3726 1.049 0.276 53.1 E 490 1774 1.367 0.276 * * 437 1583 0.953 0.276 40.4 E Intersection Delay = * (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = is greater than one. Calculation of D1 is infeasable. 4 ' • HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERCTION SUMMARY Version 2. 01-11-1996 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation --- Streets: (E-W) BOONES FERRY RD (N-S) 1-5 NB RAMP Analyst: KNK File Name: EPMC.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-11-96 PM PEAK Comment: COMBINED TRAFFIC-EXISTING GEOMETRY. No. Lanes Volumes Lane Width RTOR Vols Lost Time Eastbound L T R 1 2 429 1333 12.0 12.3 3.00 3.00 0 Westbound L T R 2 860 12.3 3.00 0 Northbound L T R 5 1 318 1 514 12.0 12.0 200 3.00 3.00 3.00 Southbound L T R Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left * Thru * * Thru * Right Right * Peds * * Peds * WB Left SB Left Thru * Thru Right Right Peds * Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 24.0A 20.0A Green 20.0A Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 Cycle Length: 76 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #2 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ..... - . .. EB L 571 1736 0.807 0.329 20.9 C 9.2 B T 2379 3690 0.633 0.645 5.6 B WB T 1030 3726 0.943 0.276 29.2 D 29.2 D NB LT 49E 1792 0.693 0.276 18.8 C 20.2 C R 442 1599 0.765 0.276 21.7 C Intersection Delay = 16.6 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C Lost Time/Cycle, L L-- 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) .,.-., 0.837 COMBINED TRAFFIC VOLUMES PROPOSED GEOMETRY AND PHASING AND NORTHBOUND MP IMPI20VEMENTS HCM: SIGNALIZED INTER L CTION SUMMARY Version 2k_ 01-11-1996 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-.W) Boones Ferry Rd (N-S) 72nd Ave. Analyst: KNK File Name: CAMNU.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-10-96 AM PEAK Comment: COMBINED TRAFFIC-PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. No. Lanes Volumes Lane Width RTOR Vols Lost Time Eastbound L T R >2 < 16 224 5 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Westbound L T R 2 1 1 488 250 763 12.0 12.0 12,0 200 3.00 3.00 3.00 Northbound L T R >1 1 2 117 436 12.0 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Southbound L T R 2 1 < 243 44 9 12.0 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BB Left * NB Left * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds Peds WB Left * SB Left * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds * * Peds * * NB Right * EB Right SB Right WE Right * Green 11.0A 23.0A Green 13.OA 13.OA Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 76 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6 #2 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS BB LTR 590 3739 0.478 0.158 19.3 C 19.3 C WB L 1118 3539 0.494 0,316 13.9 B 12.5 B T 588 1863 0.467 0.316 13.9 B R. 854 1583 0.724 0.539 10.7 B NB LT 330 1791 0.397 0.184 18.1 C 11.8 B R 762 1524 0.629 0.500 10.1 B SB L 639 3471 0.430 0.184 18.0 C 1'7.8 C TR 328 1780 0.177 0.184 16.9 C Intersection Delay = 13.8 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.611 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERS...TION SUMMARY Version 2.C., 01-11-1996 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W) Boones Ferry Rd (N-S) 72nd Ave. Analyst: KNK File Name: CPMNU.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-10-96 PM PEAK Comment: COMBINED TRAFFIC-PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. Eastbound L T R 4 .,. Westbound L T R Northbound L T R Southbound L T R No. Lanes Volumes Lane Width RTOR Vols Lost Time 2 29 488 2 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 2 1 1 434 295 346 12.0 12.0 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 >1 1 4 82 536 12.0 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right SB Right Green 13.0A 19.0A Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 2 1 421 168 12.0 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 NB Left Thru Right Peas SB Left Thru Right Peds EB Right WE Right * Green 13.0A 15.0A Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 76 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6 #2 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ES LTR WB L R NB LT R SB L TR 691 3752 0.857 0.184 26.7 D 26.7 922 3505 0.527 0.263 15.9 C 14.4 486 1845 0.661 0.263 18.5 C 763 1568 0.493 0.487 8.9 B 388 1841 0.240 0.211 16.2 C 14.9 743 1568 0.785 0.474 14.7 B 639 3471 0.738 0.184 22.0 C 25.0 321 1742 0.826 0.184 30.3 D Intersection Delay = 19.2 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C Lost Time/Cycle, L . 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.810 ■4, rit vo 1446 4.0 .... .... 14. OW 440 ma 4.1. F. }CM: SIGNALIZED INTEg. .CTION SUMMARY Version 2L 01-11-1996 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W) BOONES FERRY RD (N-S) 1-5 SB RAMP Analyst: KNK File Name: DAMC.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-11-96 AM PEAK Comment: COMBINED TRAFFIC-EXISTING GEOMETRY. No. Lanes Volumes Lane Width RTOR Vols Lost Time = Eastbound L T R 2 1 617 259 12.3 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 Westbound L T R 2 2 440 1018 13.3 12.3 3,00 3.00 111 Northbound L T R Southbound L T R 1 >1 1 417 1 440 12.3 12.3 13.3 130 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds * Peds WE Left * SB Left * Thru * * Thru * Right Right * Peds * * Peds * NB Right EB Right SB Right WE Right Green 20.OA 24.0A Green 20.OA Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 Cycle Length: 76 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS _____ ........ ..... .. --- EB T 1202 3655 0.592 0.329 14.3 B 14.4 B R 506 1538 0.563 0.329 14.7 B WE L 1010 3657 0.494 0.276 15.2 C 7.8 B T 2402 3726 0.489 0.645 4.7 A SE L 489 1770 0.468 0.276 15.3 C 17.8 C LT 490 1775 0.469 0.276 15.3 C R 452 1636 0.754 0.276 21.1 C Intersection Delay = 12.0 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.612 4 . - HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERCTION SUMMARY Version 2, Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W) BOONES FERRY RD (N-S) I-5 RAMP Analyst: KNK File Name: DPMC.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-11-96 PM PEAK Comment: COMBINED TRAFFIC - EXISTING GEOMETRY No. Lanes Volumes Lane Width RTOR Vols Lost Time 2 2 549 630 13.3 12.3 111 3.00 3.00 1 >1 1 745 10 377 12.3 12.3 13.3 110 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 20.0P 24.0P Green 20,0P Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 Cycle Length: 76 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS EB T 1250 3800 0.900 0.329 25.0 C 24.0 C R 526 1599 0.738 0.329 20.9 C WI) Li 1020 3693 0.583 0.276 18.7 C 11.0 B T 2426 3763 0.287 0.645 4.5 A SB Li 494 1787 0.810 0,276 26.3 D 24.4 C LiT 496 1794 0.797 0.2'76 25.5 D R 456 1652 0.616 0.276 20.0 C Intersection Delay = 19.8 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.772 v. HM: SIGNALIZED INTER. 2TION SUMMARY Version 2, 01-11-1996 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W) BOONES FERRY RD (N-S) 1-5 NB RAMP Analyst: KNK File Name. EAMC2.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-11-96 AM PEAK Comment: COMBINED TRAFFIC-WITH NB RAMP IMPROVEMENT. No. Lanes Volumes Lane Width RTOR Vols Lost Time Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R 1 2 244 790 12.0 12.3 3.00 3.00 2 885 12.3 3.00 0 Northbound Southbound L T R L T R 1 >1 1 575 1 559 12.0 12.0 12,0 250 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left * Thru * * Thru * Right Right * Peds * * Peds * WB Left SB Left Thru * Thru Right Right Peds * Peds NB Right MS Right. SE Right WB Right Green 21.0A 23.0A Green 20.0A Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 Cycle Length: 76 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS I* *I EB L 503 1736 0.565 0.289 15.9 C 6.9 B T 2379 3690 0.406 0.645 4.3 A WE T 1177 3726 0.918 0.316 24.4 C 24.4 C NB L 489 1770 0.683 0.276 18.5 C 20.7 C LT 490 1774 0.685 0.276 18.6 C R 437 1583 0.821 0.276 24.8 C Intersection Delay = 16.8 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C Lot Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.772 * ........ * ..... ****** ........... * ...... * ..... *** }CM: SIGNALIZED INTER1, .TION SUMMARY Version 2, 01-11-1996 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W) BOONES FERRY RD (N-S) 1-5 NB RAMP Analyst: KNK File Name: EPMC2.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-11-96 PM PEAK Comment: COMBINED TRAFFIC-WITH NB RAMP IMPROVEMENT. No. Lanes Volumes Lane Width RTOR Vols Lost Time Eastbound L T R 1 2 429 1333 12.0 12.3 0 3.00 3.00 Westbound L T R 2 860 12.3 3.00 0 Northbound L T R 1 >1 1 318 1 514 12.0 12.0 12.0 250 3.00 3.00 3.00 Southbound L T R Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 EB Left * NB Left * Thru * * Thru * Right Right * Peds * * Peds * WB Left SB Left Thru * Thru Right Right Peds * Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 21.0A 28.0A Green 20.0A Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 Cycle Length: 76 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay 88 L T WB T NB L LT a 503 1736 0.917 2379 3690 0.633 1177 3726 0.825 494 1787 0.346 0.289 32.5 0.645 5.6 0.316 19.0 0.276 14.4 495 1792 0.347 0.276 14.4 442 1599 0.643 0.276 17.9 C Intersection Delay = 14.6 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L 9.0 sec Critica1 v/c(x) t. 0.798 LOS ID 13 c 4.. 7 8 Appxoach: Delay LOS ho. 11.9 13 19.0 16.0 44- MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED CIVIL 6 STRUCTURAL • TRANSPORTATION 0690 S.W. BANCROFr STREET • P.O. 180X 69039 PORTLAND, OREGON 97201-0039 6 (503) 224-9560 0 FAX (503) 228-1285 SHT. OF 4r NI eNGINEEFIING INCOI4PORATED ift16 ALL FlIGHTS RESERVED 7-"- /075- "4/ 6/1° )86...-: 3 45-bg '7' 44 I P052:i IN Z 67/1/ 2 95' . z,2 .x 5-0 .7, . 07.s BY DATE MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED JOB NO. CIVIL • STRUCTURAL TRANSPORTATION 0690 BANCROFT STREET * P.O. BOX 69039 PORTLAND, OREGON 97201-0039 • (503) 224-9560 • FAX (503) 228-1285 MACKENZIE LNGINEERIND INCORPORATED 1095 ALL maws RE8ERVED Wi3L7 44-0 9,.z& /Li— :417,21 47L Pfssorifirj all 4/tz veleieg ail ilk- n- de. dirl- l'ufr() lev,u2 ML7 z, // 58A i s 4-7 V4 , MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED CIVIL * STRUCTURAL 'TRANSPORTATION 0690 S.W. BANCROFT STREET e P.O. 130X 69030 PORTLAND, OREGON 97201-0039 • (603) 224-9560 • FAX (50,3) 228-1205 Slit or MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCMPORATED "" 1095 ALL RIGHT9 RESERVED idz'o E87// z 7-0 g IC = 5.111 RT 676 3x8t6 67‘ 0377.1 /0/S X2' 37- 25O/ • Epe- 24s-((.5-)62) n v• /00* ( 4-.13t0141 1:4 Th1L k-(3 Ittd,6 4 x 534 /33c egm.- 1.2L21- ?,19 ><1336 et9-7 /3F6 Cot:I Z77 /035(.5 361. • •— m<7,e+-if 1-1-ePect.5 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED CIVIL ' STRUCTURAL • TRANSPORTATION 0600 0,W BANCROFT STREET • P.O. BOX 69039 PORTLAND, OHEGON 97201-0039 • (503) 224-9560 • PAX (503) 228-1285 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATE ":' 1n5 ALL HIGH rG REGERVED e ' • • • • 4 • n ..' Obleit/ n(z., 6i6 42,) 82c1 L1-2 E67/11 .7.3 (Sze. ) (o5 EIS .2.7--(821) Zit/ Er 22. - q24) 6877/ 231 66)-- Xi AI x25- = 157 (4-7 q) z) C-Beer 1.72 114 111 AriaarestrarlaimePrimul - 4A x2c —27 el^Ptle C • e r ) ' MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED CIVIL 0 STRUCTURAL 0 TRANSPORTATION 0690 S.W, 9ANCROFT STREET 0 P0. BOX 69030 PORTLAND, OREGON 91201-0030 (503) 224-9560 0 FAX (503) 228-1285 BY tIl<24 DATE 96" JOB NO. V2:303-7e'll SHT. Or MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED `'"' 1995 ALL AtL1148 RESERWiD • • , • 1 • • Li cf8 . PV8L.7 .:: 335_ (Pi ) (1.5)(25) :I: (5 (47.4)(z) AIBE-7.-_--f-Ig 0.5) ' (474) 49 k,\/ .T/3_ 5-7 S-0 N8) r as12 (2sy.,2s) I 15 (L737) a- lAieRT _2 33 c!'s . (474) ki8TH 186 (i.c.)C2c) =15-a (44.4) ?I t MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED CIVIL 4 STRUCTURAL * TRANSPORTATION 0690 S.W. BANCROFT STREET. P.O. BOX 60030 POPTLAI ID, OREGON 97201-0039 * (503) 224-9560 Fax (503) 228-1285 4' • , • )4'7 • 13Y DATE /- JOB No. St-T• __a_ OF MACKENZIE ENDINEERIND INaORPOPIA1 ED 1595 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED • � 11111I11i11j1111t1111 .111111fllilil!l11I111 _t11111ililtiii11111111 II111111 01011111111 111111illi11,111111111 1111111111111111111111 i 1111111 t i 11111111111 j 1111111111111411111111 I11111!lililll1lti1111 1111110m11111111111 111 l l h J l l l l 111 l 1111111 111111i111iii111111111 11111Il l l l ll011111111 11111111iinii11111111 1111111111111111 11111t1iii11P1iiitlliI 1111I1i111111111 1111111111 w11111111 illlll11111lilil 1/111111mmill1111111 111l1PI111111111 tll ull II �il!l111t liitltii 1 111111; 111,l11,1niiI �11Pl,t Nr "ti1l111= 1111!111. will1I11111111- Zi' ai I 111 C I!!!l1111 al '1111 Y liiiiil11IU'liiliiti iliilir Iiilillll! l 1, lliiiiiillligiiii! 11 i1111Ii,iliilllilIl it Winn' 11 1i„ Mil! 11 Wlllli,llfililtll! 1il ltlliiil� llliitil ill lllllli 1111111 Hi 1!!111 11 111111 111111 117 1111 1111 Ii111111 1(11111111111111 11111 U11111 1111 1111111' 11111!11, 111 ;111 o1:11 11111 111111: T1.11 111111 to 111111111111111 11111 j 11111111 P 11111 111111 tI1111111i11111 iit111 11P11111111111 111!!! IiIt11llPlilll !1�l111 llPlililtliti 1111111 Nl111i111'11 1111111] ,111I111I111i IIIIMP! 1 11111111111it 11111111 1 1111111111 11111111 411111111 111111 111111111 1 11 111111111 Jas Otr =.I 31 /3S • Northbound Ramp 1 1111111111111111111111111111111ti • 24 IivE .1) JNI) UND 545' 28" —4> 24 24' *.5,-,f; .1 ,sor lop • oar •••■■■•■•••••■■■•• urnerantomasumergessessionalasweiralsomaamiammeavarearvowermalinerrerommmeremenermse DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED BY: BTA DATE: JANUARY 10, 1996 JOB NUMBER: 293037,04 SHEET OF MACKENZI LNOINtERING INCORPORATED 1995 ALL RIGHTS RE.SERVED kriiiitortivott1c0Vitki OW Oil eitt4 It..,••■•••00.111, 241'414> FIGURE 10A timaitommi7stamporomeranseamemmierszeistamtermaimmleammenuerommemonmemumniPontememonam EXISTING PROGPIE'SSION MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Civil • Structural • irotisportafloh 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street 41, P.O. 13o< 69039 Porfland, Oregon 97201-0039 Phone: (503)224-5560 • PAX: (503)228-1285 44112ttllllltlilll1il ilIHH'11111;ltiifll 11I111f111111II1t1111 III4t111jI11lllIii111 1lil111111111111ti111 d414tH1tl1S411114SSI Iuu tilililttllitl4 1111IIIIflHii}pilll 1inui11111l141t1111 tltlttii1�l411fi fllllii'lll11111J111f1f1 ilil1i1111l11111Silli J,4IIIIIllllllglll1111! 'l ltiilitiimilliiliii II IIiIIIIItl1141ttt11lt 1i 11111i11111111i1i1111 Iil1f111}II11t1111filfl 111itlllil1ll1111111111 .1llif41II1t1i1III1ilUi '1i11411111i444t44itifl II11lIIll113ifii }1111q IlUltlltilllilliftiltil Itulitfiilllili1141111 hii11114tllitlilglt111 1115111114p 1111111 111111111 p41111111 11111111 Illilil,ClD1111111U N 1111 0114111114 ii tititilii1ii itii IIIlII" »t1II,Il41i1 llltlltI}i11I1liHlill IllIllitliiiii' 1111111 1111111 llittit111111. I'iliI111'}II111111 l 114fi1141ii111ljilill4 1itlltlfi1111t1i11i111 1111111111 iitt11141g�33 111111111 i11111i1f1 1!111111 11111111 I 1t1l111 11111! {i ,1liillillt �1i11S1111 Itlt'144 - - It 4414 II 11111111H u11411 II 111111114 , 11111i 11 111 1 111111 OD 11111 111 111111111(\11411 II! 11111111111i}Ii1ll! III 111111I111i1111111 111 111114t111111111i1 111 111111111411111111 111 11'111111111111111 III 1111I11111I114 1 iII 11111111111111111 III! 1t111SA1111111 i 1111 11111.1111111111 1.1111 1!IIli111111111. 1115 1111114111141' 11111 1I it'11UI1S L,7111 x i -wr--- vN I . x1!) 1 "' i --1 I 1 1 I O ‘0 Das Q� =,I 3-1V3S • • I • • • Northbound Ramp 110 2814 1 -14 2441Tr> -J 24" 28 "- ••••••••■••■••••■•••••••.,............ TIME ED UND JND • 560' DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED BY: STA DATE: JANUARY 10, 1996 JOB NUMBER: 293037.04 SHEET CF © MACKENZIE ENCINEERING INCORPORATED 1995 ALL PICHT$ RESERVED itioe ioWiftmorionmeuti H ocitier4 tea fokoi 24N am0M11/4 El" 241 <1— .....t> FIGURE 10E3 PROPOSED PROGRESSION AM PEAK WITH 72ND AVE PHASING ADJUSTMENT MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED clot Structural • Transporfollon 0690 S, W, Igor:croft Street 0 P.O. Sox 69059 PortIond, Oregon 97201-0039 Phone: (503)224-9560 • FAX: (503)228-1286 r r • Sent by: MSA /MEI 503 228 1285 01/23/95 2:38PM )max Job 83 Page i/3 MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P,C, Architecture * Planning o Interior Design 503/224 -9570 • FAX 503/228 -1285 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Civil • Structural • Transportation 503/224 -9560 • FAX 503/228 -1285 0690 S.W. Bancroft Street P,O, Box 69039 Portland, Oregon 97201 -0039 FAX COVER SHEET Date;, „ ?4,19 Coman: 1.125 e'r4 C - 6 4 . 4 Attention :7,041,. b� -► _. Project Name: ► , Description: Tv. � r From: kosfei.4.7--- 0 Project Number:.. 27133,1 , t,4 FAX: 6, — 444r a Comments or Special Instruction: cc by FAX tb: .,e 5t..1 FAX: Total Number of pages (including this cover sheet): If you did not receive all pages, please call our Records Department, ORIGINAL Wt t, „ _/WILL NOT FOLLOW BY MAIL. toNFlt?gN'f' 1taUv Nollat Thtt Ir srr rt torit2Itod In thin tocOitillo two/141300o centodoriliA1 OM 14114 as:I nay int tha Pea dpi Itio kx#rida or entity tarried aka, I th i kidder rneagtagti la nbl t16 ihtonded tociplont, this tettitt w notification that ariy going, clit4avaita, r ►pylrrq, dt tribuilWr, at tha taking at any action In tolionop on the oorriontM Of thia co nowniCation is striati prohiblied It thte tratiatniaafari Voati twa40.41 iry tutor, irnmodlatealy wit)/ eta of 24 570 to ananget fcr raturn thn c+ J in I facolmiie. intarriat U" OCINI ,,.._......,, �,.,,_......, SOder _.. tio.irodvild 41 P bbporttrwht X Seht by: MSA /MEI 503 228 1285 01/23/96 2 :s9PM ,/f Job 83 Page 2/3 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED oval • STR.1C1IJAAAt. • s►.JI3VE YJNG • "TRANSPORTATION 06(.40 M> W f3ANC,RnF 1 '7 I NI. k I • P(') ('dux 690'1,I P ITL:ANC1 (')I'(r(iON 9f2(Ji.oc :ifi • +!+(,i'i 224 WO • f Ax i' +I1 4, January 23, 1996 Washington County Department of Land Use & Transportation Engineering Services Attention: Torn WQlch 155 North First Avenue, Suite 350 -17 Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 Re: Bingham Site Development Traflre Analysis MEI Project Number 293037,04 Der Tom: Thank you for your comments on the proposed traffic mitigation measures for the intersection of Boones Ferry Road with SW 72nd Avenue, Desispi of the intersection improvements will take place in the future, but I would like to address your concerns about the traffic analysis at this time, As you are aware, the original Bingham site development plan called for a 68,000 s.t; grocery store. A traffic study was prepared by MEI in September of 1993 which reflected the grocery store development, The 1993 . report indicated a growth rate of 9,5% per year based. upon counts taken in July and August of 1993 and. June of 1990. Trafno counts Were conducted by MEI staff at the intersections of Booties Ferry Road at 72nd Avenue and the 1-5 interchange, and at. 72nd Avenue with Durham Road, in the Fall of 1995 and January 1996. Based upon the average growth rate from June of 1990 to the current counts, traffic volumes have been increasing at a lower rate of 3,5%. In fact, traffic voles have decreased at the intersections of Bo ones Ferry with 72nd Avenue and the southbound ramp by 300 vehicles during the PM peak hour. Traffic counts were conducted by MEI stair at t e intersections of Booties Ferry Road at 72nd Avenue and the 1 -5 interchange, and at 72nd Avenue with Wham Read, in November 1995 and January 1996. The counts indicate that the total inters Lion volumes at the Booms Ferry /72nd intersection have decreased, while the eastbound arid southbound volumes have increased. This may be, m part, due; to Costco moving and improvements occurring to the interchange at NyI'ag Road which was under construction at the time of the previous counts from July 1993, Currently, the site is pled for 75,000 s,f, of retail, Specific tents include a 25,000 s,f, botore, ar 41,000 s,f,, store specializing in be drown,, bath, and similar interior home products, and an Additional 9000 ILL of retail space not yet committed. Trip generation estinwtes for the currently proposed development utilized 1TE rates for a Furniture Stare (890) for the interiors store and Shopping Center (820) for the bookstore and lease space, These uses are anticipated to generate eolisiderably less PM peak hour Ugric, than a grocery store, even with a larger footprint, The total trip generation for each development is listed in the table below, E.01-1147A1,90.0 WOO/ U4U3L).s Sent by: MSA/MEI 503 228 1285 Tri ► Generation Cam Development FEB Code AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Exit Enter Exit 1993 Study Grocery Store 1995 Prop sod Development 820 $554 82 47 The current development primal assumes a pass -by percentage of 20% and diverted link of 15 %. The 1993 study assumed 25% and 10% respectively for the grocery store. New trips were assumed to be 6,5% of the total fos both scenarios. os. I hope this information addresses your questions about the specific site development plans and trip generation. Please all me if you have any additional questions. Brent Ahrend Traffic Analyst 13TA./sk c; Lars Stmt, Dave Larson - MEI Greg Berry.. City of Tigard Allan Troyer, Mary Jcnsvold w ODOT FAIVPDATAW6,01\9300.04i i,1 sk HAMILTON PR-OPERTIESTZ RECEIPT 96-280061- FRIIM WI* MER D P SIT TO-- TREES JE # 48 Month Ending: Reviewed by: Date: Ln # MU Mil10-0000-220000 4 Account # Debit(+) Credit(-) Amount 10-0000-101000 6,830.00 NW 6,830.00 20-0000-101000 6,830.00 20-0000-417000 11=1 6,830.00 11111141111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 6 8 9 ________. 10 ________ - IIIIIIIIIIII 111111111111 r•■•• .........., aIIIIIIII I 4 - 15 - 16 17 '18 19 _IIIIIII. 20 21 MOM 22 -0 - 24 ■•••■•••Wwwwww44 25 11111.111. 26 27 28- ..... ........ ............. 29 Yftro.nal 30 • -,• /1ANg HANAL'OAU U4G E0 VUH'/iL.A,No O0J.IP, t'AVOLUI vot.1,IttEu co.iLo:A.q.0 LoEt-t. tol 1 LO, • -4xU1,q4t ti14. ou,;,.444 10iGT ,.1L1 PAA,JteJ,., 1;_2,11 a .4'.410011,11 • • MEMORANDUM TO: BY: DATE: PROJECT: SUBJECT: Mr. Lans Stout MacKenzie /Saito Associates 0690 SW Bancroft Portland, Oregon 97201 Michael O'Brien Mike Faha and Associates May 20, 1996 Bingham Site Development Plan Revisions Mike Faha ssociates Landscape Arthitects In response to our meeting of 5-15-96, I have revised the planting plan for the bingham site according to ODOT comments. The Douglas Firs that were to be planted in the R.O.W. have been removed on the plan. I have placed several of the Firs within the site where possible, and the rest are as follows: Specie Size Pseudotsuga menziesii..........Y...: f ~5' Y....... Pseudotsuga menziesii ...............6 -7' YYY..Y.. Pseudotsuga Ofi,;l. Cast ea .... 2 $65.00.... 61 ............. $100.00...... ..., 3 $200.00 Please call me if you have any questions or comments, End of Memo cc: File Total $130.00 .... $6,100.00 $6,830.00 800 NW SIXTH AVENUE 0 SUITE 327 PORTLAND, oh, 97209 • PHONE: (503) 222 -5612 • FAX (503) 222 -2283 Sent by: (LISA /NISI 503 228 1285 05/14/96 4 :11PM jetffix Job 740 Page 2(2 Q,> 05/ 14 15;48 1 995 FROM: 1 503 222 2283 TO; 2 473 ( PAGE: 1 ,, 5-14.-1996 2 : 41 PM .. ! MIKE FAHA At'D ASSOC. 1 Eala 22 2283 P,1 T O: Mr, Karl Koroch MacKenzie Engineering Inc. 0690 SW Bancroft Portland, Oregon 97201 B Y: Michael O'Brien Mike FAN and Associates DATE; May 14, 1996 PROJECT: Binghnm Site Development SUBJECT: Tres Mitigation The following Is a list of the plant materials in the 1.5 right of way at the Bingham site, and our estimated costs for installation: Psoudotsuga ...r. 25......r,..r $55,00.......... $1,625,00 PPseudeo�tMsluga menzkeli...,.►.,... ►r. ►8- X7'.,,...,...82 $100,000ry.......... $8,200 ►10 Pseudotsuga menz esil►►..►►.„.. i4 -i6' �..r.nw...r. 4..r .... $2C0.0� ....., ..rr. $800.00 Cornus s, 'Flaviramoa°....r..r18 -24" ►..8 $35.00... ..... ►.r.. Q $1 0,905,00 cc: Pile see NW WIXM MICE r' SUITE 321 + P I AND, Otis 0200 PHONE: (6O3 ) T22 -012 v (503) 222.2* CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION MINOR MODIFICATION TO AN APPROVED SITE PLAN SITE DEVELOPMENT REVEW (SDR) 93-0017 BINGHAM/MEGAFOODS • I. APPLICATION SUMMARY CASE: FILE NAME: Site Development Review MegaFppds SDR 93-0017 PROPOSAL: A request for a Minor Modification to an approved Site Development Review (SDR 93-0017) (a 68,240 square foot grocery store), to provide for a 74,945 square foot shopping plaza consisting of a bookstore, home interiors store and a general retail pad. OWNER/ Bingham Investments APPLICANT: 3939 N.W, St. Helens Road Portland, OR 97210 (503) 624-6300 ZONING DESIGNATION: C-G (General Commercial). LOCATION: 16700 SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 2S1 13AD, Tax Lot 1700). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Section 18.120.070. IL DECISION rassmsmati Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV, IIL BACKGROUND 111MRMATft_ Emperty History: This parcel was annexed into the City of Tigard in 1976, and was zoned I-L (Light Industrial). A Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA 90-0004) and Zone Change (ZON 90-0002) was approved in 1990, changing the zoning from I-L (Light Industrial) to CG (General Commercial) In 1993, a Site Development Review (SDR 93-0017) was approved allowing the construction of a 68,240 square foot grocery store, NOTICE OP DECISION MINOR MODIFICATION (SDR g3.0017) PAGE 1 • • • • • • h • informatio _ : The site is bounded on the west by SW 72nd Avenue, an the east by Interstate 5, on the north by the Oregon Business Park, and on the south by a Tri -Met Park & Ride lot. Surrounding uses and zoning designations are an industrial park zoned I -L (Light industrial) to the north, and industrial park zoned I -P (Industrial Park) to the west. Industrial development is the predominant land use on the west side of the freeway interchange. Southwest 72nd Avenue is designated as a major collector street, An extension of Durham Road and traffic signal control improvements at the SW 72nd Avenue /Durham Road intersection have been completed, South of the site is the SW 72nd Avenue /Bridgeport Road intersection. This intersection is outside the City of Tigard. It is within the City of Tualatin, but under the jurisdiction of ODOT and Washington County. Site Information n Proposal Description: The 6.6 acre undeveloped site is generally flat and is slightly below the grade of the freeway, thereby, providing substantial exposure to freeway traffic. There is a stand of large Douglas Fir trees on the site, along with smaller deciduous trees and low-lying brush. The applicant requests Minor Modification approval to the approved Site Development Review (SDR 93- 0017), The modified site plan would provide for a 74,945 square foot commercial plaza, consisting of a bookstore, home interiors store and a general retail pad. IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS The Tigard Community Development Code, Site Development Review Section, states; "if the requested modification meets any of the major modification criteria, that this request shall be reviewed as a new Site Development Review application." This request does not meet any of the eleven (11) approval criteria for qualification as a major modification. Section 18.120.070(13) states that the Director shall determine that a major modification(s) will result if one or more of the following changes are proposed. There will be: 1. An increase in dwelling unit density, or lot coverage for residential development This criteria is not applicable as this request involves commercial uses, 2. A change ih the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units. This criteria is not applicable as this request involves commercial uses, 3. A change that requires additional on -site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.106, .106, The original approved grocery store use required 341 parking spaces, based upon a required parking ratio of one (1) space per 200 gross square feet (68,240/400). The proposed general commercial retail space requires 187 spaces, based upon a required ratio of one (1) space per 400 gross NOTICE OF DECISION MINOR MODIFICATION (SDR 93.00i7) PACE 2 A • . . square feet (74,9 :00). This criteria is, therefore, sa'1.4,._ ?..d as the change does not require additional on-site parking. The proposed plan is actually providing 347 parking spaces, which is more than the original plan. Even though the actual number of spaces has increased, the applicant is not being required to provide this many. Again, this criteria is satisfied as this increase is not required as a result of the modified site plan. 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code. Both the approved and proposed structure is classified as a B2 occupancy, thereby, satisfying this criteria. 5. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20 percent. The proposed height is 28 feet, eight (8) feet lower than the approved building height. This criteria is satisfied. 6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected. The modifications to the parking area will not effect off-site traffic. While the plan shows that the most southerly driveway has been moved approximately 125 feet, this change in location will not effect off-site traffic. The new location increases the distance between the access and the intersection of primary concern. 7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and the increase can be expected to exceed 20 vehicles per day. The applicant's revised traffic study successfully shows that, although the total retail space is being increased, traffic will be reduced. This is largely accomplished by the low trip generation of the home interiors store. 8. An increase in the floor area proposed for a non-residential use by more than 10 percent excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet. The plan shows an increase from 68,240 square feet to 75,945 square feet. This 6,705 square foot increase is a 9.8% increase, under the 10% limit in this criteria, 9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space which reduces the open space area below the minimum required by this code or reduces the open space area by more than 10 percent. There is no required open space element required for this project. The area devoted to landscaping has increased from 49,216 square feet (16,5%) to 52,769 square feet (17.7%), The CwG zone requires the provision of a minimum of 15% of the site for landscaping. 10. A reduction of project amenities (Recreational facilities, Screening; and/or, Landscaping provisions) below the minimum established by this code or by more than 10 percent where specified in the site plan. Recreational facilities are not required as part of a commercial development. Screening shall be provided in accordance with code standards, The area devoted to landscaping has increased from 49,216 square feet (16.5%) to 52,769 square feet (17.7%). The C-G zone requires the provision of a minimum of 15% of the site for landscaping. NOTICE or DEC WON MINOR MODIPICATION (SW 93.0017) • PAGE 3 f. • • 11. A modification T the conditions imposed at the te of site development review approve hich are not the subject of B. 1 ough 10 above of this subsection. The Engineering Department has stated that the proposed utilities and public improvements do not require modifications of the conditions of approval. The revised plan also shows how all of the development standards contained in the original decision can, and will be satisfied, Therefore, this request is determined to be a minor modification to an existing site, The Director's designee has determined that the proposed minor modification of this existing site will promote the general welfare of the City and will not be significantly detrimental, nor injurious, to surrounding properties provided that development which occurs after this decision complies with applicable local, state and federal laws. STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Engineering Department has reviewed this proposal and has the following comments: The requested approval may be approved upon a finding that the proposed modification is not a major modification(s) in accordance with Subsection 18,120.070B of the Community Duvelopment Code, Item 6 of that subsection is a "change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected". The modified site plan shows that the proposed access to SW 72nd has been relocated about 125' south, Since this increases the distance between the access and the intersection of concern, no adverse affect to off-site traffic is expected. Moreover, there are no driveways along the opposite side of SW 72nd Avenue creating alignment concerns. Item 7 is "an increase in vehicular traffic to, and from the site, and the increase can be expected to exceed 20 vehicles per day," The Applicant's revised traffic study successfully shows that although the total retail space is being increased, traffic will be reduced, This is largely accomplished by the low trip generatior of the home interiors store. Item 11 is a "modification to the conditions of ipproval". The currently proposed utilities and public improvements do not require modifications of the conditions of approval, Recommendation:, The Engineering Department has no objection to the proposed Minor Modification. VI. PROCEDURE ARP APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: ...L The applicant and owners X Owners of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies NOTICE OF DECISION MINOR MODIFICATION (SDR 93-0017) PAGE 4 a Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON MARCH 13, 1996 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. .•••••••••••■•••■••••••••••• 8$42031: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18,32,370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 p.m. on March 13, 1996. Questions: If you have questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY: William D'Andrea Ass,iant Planner 6C4A., 1. Richard Bewer Senior Planneti DATE IL2219.0_ DATE NOTICE F DECISION MINOR MCFCATION (SDR 9O�17) PAGE 5 • •• 0. PLOT PLAN EXHIBIT MAP APPROVtD SITE PLAN MECiAPOODS SDR 0-0017 PLOT PLAN ) EXHIBIT MAP REVISETh PLAN loon A MINOR MODIHICATION TOE SDR 934017 M1f GAFOODS r ■ 14 R' waimkair oiwmi Avg , Apr Now vas ,„„ WBRJD Vicinity Map Note, Map is not kJ scale SUBJECT PARCEL -velar me* 0, kit SDR 93 -0017 MEGAF'OODS MINOR MOD. 14/grig 72' fir/ ' ' 4.S113AG00103 Vicinity Mai► Note: Map Is not to scale h S113D0050O CO 70Q - a 12 111p9# C Rf O n NOTIFICAI1ONMAP 4.4 SDR 93 -17 MEGAFOODS ,, . Q MACKENZIE/ �.; ,'O & ASSOCIATES, RC, ARCHITECTURE e PLANNING » INTERIOR DESIGN 0690 SW BANCROFT STREET • PO. BOX 69039 PORTLAND, OREGON 97201-0039 • (503) 224 -9570 • FAX (503) 228 -1285 January 23, 1996 City of Tigard Attention: Will D'Andrea 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-8199 Re: Modified Site Plan for City File SDR 93 -0017 Bingham Project Number 293037.05 Dear Will: • Enclosed are revised site development documents to replace the approved package under City File SDR 93-0017. As you know, based upon our discussions, our intent is to revise the existing approved plan to reflect the new concepts within the criteria of a "minor modification" (18.120.070), and consistent with the conditions of the original approval. To assist in your review, I will summarize information with respect to several key issues and document compliance with the Code criteria and prior condition as follows, CONCEPT OF MODIFIED SITE PLAN The approved plan provided for a single tenant (grocery store), while the modified plan provides for three tenant spaces. Two of the tenants are established (books and home interiors), while the third is yet to be determined. The site development criteria are compared as follows: You will note that the new site plan is more efficient as a result of part; of the floor area being in a mezzanine rather than all on ground level, as in the prior plan, Also the new building configuration allows a more efficient site layout, providing the opportunity to increase landscaping while maintaining the parking count. :1WPDA`I`A1 - 0IW3031,051051.1,TES 1993 APPROVED PLAN 1995 REVISION Building Area 68,240 SF 74,945 SF ( +9,8 %) Landscape Area 49,216 SF 52,769 SF ( +7,2 %) Parking 354 347 (.1.9%) You will note that the new site plan is more efficient as a result of part; of the floor area being in a mezzanine rather than all on ground level, as in the prior plan, Also the new building configuration allows a more efficient site layout, providing the opportunity to increase landscaping while maintaining the parking count. :1WPDA`I`A1 - 0IW3031,051051.1,TES Modified Site Plan for City File SDR 93 -0017 Project Number 293037.05 January 23, 1996 Page 2 TREES The issue of tree preservation was addressed in the 1993 Plan and City Conditions, An accompanying drawing indicates the tree preservation areas previously approved and as modified as a result of the new site plan. You will note that the 1993 Plan and provide for comparable areas to be designated for tree preservation. The approach to final decision on actual trees to be saved, and appropriate techniques, are addressed in a separate arborist report. This initial report, by Bill Owen ( Arborist), addresses the tree preservation concepts, while a detailed construction and maintenance plan will be submitted with permit documents. Prior conditions of approval related to trees are addressed in a following section. TRAFFIC A traffic study update has been prepared and submitted to Randy Wooley, City Engineer. Copies have been distributed to ODOT, Tri -Met, and Washington County, with the goal of reaching a consensus as appropriate improvements to the intersection of SW 72nd Avenue / SW Lower Boones Ferry Road. The traffic - related conditions of the 1993 approval are addressed in a following section. CODE CRITERIA Section 18,120,070 of the Code lists the criteria by which a determination is made with respect to the site plan modification process, Each is addressed as follows, indicating that the proposed modification is "minor" by definition: 1.x"7 'An increase in dwelling unit density, or lot coverage for residential development)." This criteria is not applicable, since no residential development is proposed. 2. / 'A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units;" This criteria is not applicable, since no residential development is proposed. 3. t' 'A change that requires additional on -site parking in accordance with Chapter I8,106;" Chapter 1.8.106 requires parking for the previous approved development at a ratio of one -wen d r1 space per 200 SF of floor area, plus one per 2 employees ( "food and beverage retail sales "); the current use ("general retail sales ") requires one space per 400 SF of floor area. Therefore, this criteria is met, since the required parking is less under the current plan than under the approved plan. 4 "A change in the type ofcommercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code;" This criteria is met, since under both the approved plan and the proposed plan the TUC will require the proposed buildings to be Type MN or IIN construction. The change in the site plan will not precipitate a higher classification. I:1WPDATA\ t`i- 01193Ofl,O3\051.,1,X8 11 Modified Site Plan for City File SDR 93 -0017 Project Number 293037,05 January 23, 1996 Page 3 5, "An increase in height of the building(s) by more than 20 percent;" v e r t i 1 1.10 The approved plan provided for a building height of approximately 36 feet to the highest • point of ridfeline. The proposed revised buildings will be approximately 28 feet in height. Since the proposed building height is less than the approved, this criteria is met. "A change in the type and location of accessways and parldng areas where off-site traffic would be affected;" �, cA -- A comparison of the site plans shows that the proposed accessways are in the same location qc P P P Po Y ..�.�..,� and are at the same type and design as shown on the approved plan. The proposed parking r'''' t 4)3.1A '� areas are in the same general location and are served by accessways to SW 72nd Avenue in the same manner as the approved plan. Therefore, this criteria is met. "An increase in vehicular tragic to and from the site and the increase can be expected to exceed 20 vehicles per day;" An accompanying update of the traffic report which was prepared for the approved plan shows that the traffic resulting from the proposed plan is actually less than the projected traffic for the approved plan. Therefore, this criteria is met. 8, / "An increase in the floor area proposed for a non - residential use by more than 10 percent excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet:" The preceding data summary shows that the proposed floor area is 9.8% greater than the floor area on the approved plan. Therefore, this criteria is met. 9. / "A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space which reduces the open space area below the minimum required by this code or reduces the open space area by more than 10 percent:" There is no specific criteria in the CG zone for open space other than landscaping. The proposed plan increases the landscaped area compared to the approved plan; therefore, this criteria is met. 10, "A reduction of project amenities below the minimum established by this code or by more than 10 percent where specified in the site plan; a. Recreational facilities; b. Screening; and/or c. Landscaping provisions; and" As noted above, recreational facilities are not required, and landscaping is increased as a result of the proposed plan. Screening is provided as required by Code in both instances. Therefore, this criteria is met. "A Modification to the conditions unposed at the time of site development review approval which are not the subject ofB.1 through 10 above this subsection," No modification to the conditions of SDR. 93-0017 are proposed or required as a result of the revised site plan. Each condition, or group of related conditions, is addressed in the following section. This criteria is met. V :1WPbATA\96- 0119303/.651051,1.1 5 0 1 • 7 • u.. Modified Site Plan for City File SDR 93 -0017 Project Number 293037.05 Januaiy 23, 1996 Page 4 CONDITIONS OF SDR 93•.0017 The conditions of the existing approval are generally applicable to both the existing approved plan and to the proposed plan. The approach to each is addressed as follows: 1. "Right -oway shall be dedicated to the public along the frontage of the proposed SW 72nd Avenue right -of -way to increase the total of the dedicated and proposed right -of way to a minimum of 30 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the centerline of the existing right -of -way of SW 72nd Avenue. 2. Standard street improvements, including concrete sidewalk, driveway apron, and street lighting shall be installed along the SW 72nd Avenue frontage. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to major collector street standards and shall conform to the alignment of existing adjacent improvements. 3. The existing traffic signal installation at the 72nd/Durham intersection shall be revised to provide signal controls for the north driveway from the site. Traffic markings on 72nd shall be revised to accommodate the projected traffic at the two site entrances." These three conditions are applicable to the proposed site plan, as well as to the approved plan, and will be met, 4.\ "The on -site driveway system shall be in accordance with the attached concept submitted ` ; ' ,E 5 by Mackenzie Engineering on December 1, 1993." W,1 �'' 0 a �, This condition was intended to address concern raised by City staff with respect to the `1* ) „. ie 7'',S , northerly site access opposite SW Durham Road. The modified plan reinforces the agreed- 60-4. d a ,, "r upon solution by providing adequate stacking distance on -site, and avoiding turn conflicts. '' , 0 '') ' if,,, VI This condition is met by the modified plan. ��, , , ��,� "The intersection of 72nd /Bridgeport /Lower Boones Ferry shall be revised as shown in Figures 78 and 8B of the report titled, "Bingham Site Development Traffic Impact Analysis," prepared by Mackenzie Engineering Incorporated and dated September 17, 1993. The pedestrian bridge shown on Figure 8B shall not be required; however, pedestrian connections shall be constructed between the Tri MetPark-and-Ride lots and the crosswalk at the southbound freeway ramps. ' �.J U e This work requires approval and permits from ODOT and Washington County. If requested by (DOT and Washington County, the Cily Engineer may require alternative improvements approved by ODOT and Washington County in lieu of the improvements shown in Figures 7B and 8B, provided that the alternative improvements are similar in cost and provide .similar traffic operational improvement. If requested by ODOT and Washington County, the City Engineer may accept payment of a fee in lieu of intersection improvements. P:\WPDATA196- 01\93037.05105L1 kS Modified Site Plan for City File SDR 93 -0017 Project Number 293037.05 January 23, 1996 Page 5 The pedestrian connections to the Park-and-Ride lots will require approval from Tri-Met, If requested by Tri-Met, the City Engineer may delete the requirement for the pedestrian connections," The condition was worded to reflect the approach to accomplishing improvements to the 72nd/Lower Boones Ferry Road intersection that resulted from extensive study in 199 ?. It also was recognized that there were remaining issues, as well as the likelihood of changing circumstances prior to implementation, hence the City Engineer was given substantial latitude to approve revisions to the conceptual plan if there was agreement among the effected jurisdictions. The accompanying traffic study update addresses these issues and recommends intersection improvements consistent with the concept of the 1993 study, as well as with the comments by the effected jurisdictions as noted in the 1993 staff report. Therefore, concurrence among the jurisdictions, along with implementation of improvements, will ensure that this condition is met. 6. "Building permits will not be issued and construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering Department has reviewed and approved the public improvements plans and a street opening permit or construction compliance agreement has been executed. A 100 percent performance assurance or letter of commitment, a developer - engineer agreement, the payment of a permit fee and a sign installation /streetlight fee are required. /mg 7. The proposed privately operated and maintained sanitary sewer and storm drainage "' system plan profile details shall be provided as part of the public improvement plans, g. The application shall demonstrate that storm drainage runoff can overflow from the site without significantly impacting the properties downstream. 9. Sanitary sewer and storm drainage details shall be provided as part of the public improvement plans. Calculations and a topographic map of the storm drainage basin and sanitary sewer service area shalt be provided as a supplement to the public improvement plans. Calculations shall be based on full development of the serviceable area. The location and capacity of existing, proposed, and future lines shall be addressed. 10. The applicants shall provide connection of the proposed building to the public sanitary sewerage system. A connection permit is required to connect to the existing public sanitary sewer system. 11. The applicant shall provide for on -site water quality treatment,' a;; required by Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No, 91-47. Submitted design calculations shall be in conformance with the general requirements of "infiltration facilities" and the specific requirements of "infiltration sumps" of Chapter 2 of Sur ace jfi!crter ality Facilities Technical Guidance Handbook USA 1991, 12. The applicant shall obtain a "joint Permit" from the City of Tigard. This permit shall meet the requirements of1VPDES and Tualatin Basin Erosion Control Program, :IWPDA"CA\9 - b1 \43U31.0,5tO5LI, :5 Modified Site Plan for City File SDR 93 -0017 Project Number 293037.05 January 23, 1996 Page 6 13. The grading plan shall comply with Chapter 70 of the State of Oregon Structural Specialty Code." All of these conditions are equally applicable to the 1993 plan, as well as to the revised plan, and will be met through permitting. 14. "Revised site and landscaping plans shall be submitted for review by the Planning Division, Staff Contract. Will D Andrea. The revised plans shall include the following: a.vl Provision of eight disabled parking spaces, including one designated "van accessible." b. Provision of 361 required parking spaces, by providing for 25% compact spaces, redesigning the spaces along the east property line to 90 degrees angle parking or through a reciprocal parking agreement with TriMet. The reciprocal parking shall be utilized when the hours of operation do not overlap." The modified site plan designates eight disabled spaces as required, A total of 347 spaces is provided through a combination of designating compact spaces, eliminating the angle parking, and increasing site efficiency. Therefore, these conditions are met since the number of spaces provided exceeds the Code minimum, Landscaping near driveway entrances shall meet visual clearance standards, VA PI 5 d V Provision of an additional 12 parking lot trees in landscaped islands to be r 1 c \ t located within the interior parking lot area Trees shall be planted in landscaped ; -,, 3p, islands and shall be equally distributed and on the basis of one tree for each ;or seven parking spaces. The minimum dimension of the landscape islands shall be r three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb." '111 V' The accompanying landscape plan provides parking lot trees at the rate of 1 per 7 spaces, in planters in excess of three feet in width. Vision clearance areas are respected by the plant selection. These conditions are met, e. "Raised crosswalks or "speed humps" to delineate the two pedestrian crossings connecting to the main entrance." The pedestrian mess system has been revised to be more functional and. appealing. The driveway crossings will be, delineated as required by this condition. f "A plan which shows compliance with Community Development Code Chapter 18.116,11Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage, The applicant shall choose one of the following four methods to demonstrate compliance, Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling .Plan or Franchised Hauler Review, and Sign-Off" This condition applies to the revised and approved plans, and will be addressed through construction perniit documents, I \WPDATA e1Wv3 )3 /.0501,1,Ks Modified Site Plan for City File SDR 93 -0017 Project Number 293037,05 January 23, 1996 Page 7 g. "A an providing r one -third o the removed trees or 0-11 p .A tree replacement pl pr g fo f � approximately 200 replacement trees. These shall be in addition to what is shown on the proposed landscaping plan. To ensure adequate short -term vyrriiill screening, a majority of the replacement trees shall be of a significant size. Tree replacement shall be concentrated along the eastern property line to further f 1ti buffer the proposed development from Interstate 5. The view corridors for signs (r,rt may be identified by the applicant so that the plan selected provides the maximum W►,\\ rro11' amount of screening while allowing visual access to the wall signs after the trees t, ,Q etittvIke mature," The accompanying landscape plan is in compliance with this condition, h. "Screening for service facilities and refuse containers, i, "Exterior elevation plans showing that the building height meets the maximum ,' 401 height requirement°' °�'` Permit documents will reflect cmpliance with these conditions, which are not effected by the modified plans. j, "Wheel stops, at least four inches high located three feet backfrom the front of xo lore( the parking stall, along the pedestrian corridor linking the main entrance with 1-4(3,,),C t: the south parking lot. This provision will encourage the free flow of pedestrian movement along this corridor." f k. "Provision of five foot sidewalks along both access drives. The sidewalk on the o �') south access should be located on the south side of the drive. The parking island )'1 . shall include a pedestrian refuge and a crosswalk should be installed connecting v‘` the sidewalk; and pedestrian refuge island. The sidewalk on the north access , ��y,S should be designed through the preserved stand ofDouglas Firs, c.: �� ' These two conditions are met by the modified site plan by realigning the pedestrian system to reduce vehicle/pedestrian conflicts. In addition to providing wheel stops, the internal pedestrian system is widened, and the main pedestrian connection is located on the south side of'the south driveway as required. These conditions are met, 1, "Provision for the 18 Red Sunset Maple Street trees to be planted with a minimum caliper of two inches at jour fret in height" nt, "Covered bicycle racks," These conditions are met as shown oti accompanying plans, P : \WP0ATA196-0 1193O31.b5 \O5L I .K8 Modified Site Plan for City File SDR 93 -0017 Project Number 293037,05 January 23, 1996 Page 8 15. Separate tree removal permits are required for the building area and parking lot. A tree protection plan shall be submitted and the applicant will install tree protection fencing prior to the start of construction. It should be placed as far from the trees as is practical, but not closer to the tree than one foot behind any necessary excavation line. Any necessary intrusion into the tree protection area must be with approval of the Planning Department When the clearing limits are determined and staked, a tree condition analysis and program of therapeutic care of the protected trees will be required. A revised tree inventory of the parking lot area shall be,submitted. Art rrborist report and prote 'lion plan identifying loc rtions suitable for additional parking lot tree retention and protection shall also be submitted, It should also identify potential' trees to be used as replacement trees." While this condition applies equally to the approved and modified plans, a preliminary report from Bill Owen (Arborist) accompanies this letter to demonstrate that the initial steps have been undertaken to address this condition, A complete report, along with supporting information as required by this condition, will be submitted along with tree removal permits. This overview and code compliance description shows that the modification to the plans approved in City File SDR 93 -0017 should be considered "minor" as defined by Code, and processed administratively as provided by Section 18.120,070 of the Code. We are now preparing the additional doctunents required by SDR 93 -0017, as well as construction permit documents, with the intent of filing for initial permits in early February. Therefore, we would appreciate your comments on the above analysis as soon as possible. We would be pleased to meet with you to discuss any of the issues in more detail, Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, tans Stout LS/ks c; Stuart Bingham - Bingham Consttuetion Steve Neville - New & Neville VAWPDATA`6- 01\9101 '.0 05L1JCS • MACKENZIE/ AITO & ASSOCIATES, P.C. ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • INTERIOR DESIGN 0690 SW. BANCROFT STREET • P.O. BOX 69039 PORTLAND, OREGON 97201 -0039 • (503) 224-9570 • FAX (503) 228 -1285 January 23, 1996 City of Tigard Attention: Will D'Andrea 13 125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223.8199 Re: Modified Site Plan for City File SDR 93 -0017 Bingham Project Number 293037,05 Dear Will: Enclosed are revised site development documents to replace the approved package under City File SDR 93 -0017, As you know, based upon our discussions, our intent is to revise the existing approved plan to reflect the new concepts within the criteria of a "minor modification" (18,120,070), and consistent with the conditions of the original approval, To assist in your review, I will summarize information with respect to several key issues and document compliance with the Code criteria and prior condition as follows. CONCEPT OF MODIFIED SITE PLAN The approved plan provided for a single tenant (grocery store), while the modified plan provides for three tenant spaces, Two of the tenants are established (books and home interiors), while the third is yet to be determined. The site development criteria are compared as follows: You will note that the new site plan is more efficient as a result of part of the .floor area being in a mezzanine rather than all on ground level, as in the prior plan. Also, the new building configuration allows a more efficient site layout, providing the opportunity to increase landscaping while maintaining the parking count. F:1WPI)ATA106 -o1 V3031.O5W5.1,10 1993 APPROVED PLAN 1995 REVISION Building Area 68,240 Si 74,945 SF (+9.8%) Landscape Area 49,216 SF 52,769 SF ( +7,2 %) Parking 354 347 ( -1.9 %) You will note that the new site plan is more efficient as a result of part of the .floor area being in a mezzanine rather than all on ground level, as in the prior plan. Also, the new building configuration allows a more efficient site layout, providing the opportunity to increase landscaping while maintaining the parking count. F:1WPI)ATA106 -o1 V3031.O5W5.1,10 Modified Site Plan for City File SDR, 93 -0017 Project Number 293037,05 January 23, 1996 Page 2 TREES The issue of tree preservation was addressed in the 1993 Plan and City Conditions. An accompanying drawing indicates the tree preservation areas previously approved and as modified as a result of the new site plan. You will note that the 1993 Plan and provide for comparable areas to be designated for tree preservation. The approach to final decision on actual trees to be saved, and appropriate techniques, are addressed in a separate arborist report. This initial report, by Bill Owen ( Arborist), addresses the tree preservation concepts, while a detailed construction and maintenance plan will be submitted with permit documents, Prior conditions of approval related to trees are addressed in a following section. TRAFFIC A traffic study update has been prepared and submitted to Randy Wooley, City Engineer. Copies have been distributed to ODOT, Tri -Met, and Washington County, with the goal of reaching a consensus as appropriate improvements to the intersection of SW 72nd Avenue / SW Lower Boones Ferry Road, The traffic- related conditions of the 1993 approval are addressed in a following section. CODE CRITERIA Section 18,120,070 of the Code lists the criteria by which a determination is made with respect to the site plan modification process, Each is addressed as follows, indicating that the proposed modification is "minor" by definition: 1. 'An increase in dwelling unit density, or lot coverage for residential development:" This criteria is not applicable, since no residential development is proposed. 2. "A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units;" This criteria is not applicable, since no residential development is proposed, 3, "A change that requires additional on -site parking in accordance with Chapter 18,106;" Chapter 18,106 requires parking for the previous approved development at a ratio of one space per 200 SF of floor area, plus one per 2 employees ( "food and beverage retail sales "); the current use ( "general retail sales ") requires one space per 400 SP of floor area, Therefore, this criteria is met, since the required parking is less under the current plan than under the approved plan. 4, "A change in the type of cotnmeroial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code;" This criteria is met, since under both the approved plan and the proposed plan the IJBC will require the proposed buildings to be Type IIIN or IIN construction, The change in the site plan will not precipitate a higher classification, AV DATAI4G.01 \9Jb11.U5io5L1.Ks L. , c: Modified Site Plan for City File SDR 93 -0017 Project Number 293037,05 January 23, 1996 Page 3 5. "An increase in height of the building(s) by more than 20 percent;" The approved plan provided for a building height of approximately 36 feet to the highest point of ridgeline. The proposed revised buildings will be approxiunate:ly 28 feet in height. Since the proposed building height is less than the approved, this criteria is met. 6, "A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off -site traffic would be affected;" A comparison of the site plans shows that the proposed accessways are in the same location, and are at the same type and design as shown on the approved plan. The proposed parking areas are in the same general location and are served by accessways to SW 72nd Avenue in the same manner as the approved plan. Therefore, this criteria is met, 7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and the increase can be expected to exceed 20 vehicles per day;" An accompanying update of the traffic report which was prepared for the approved plan shows that the traffic resulting from the proposed plan is actually less than the projected traffic for the approved plan. Therefore, this criteria is met. 8. "An increase in the floor area proposed foe a non - residential use by more than 10 percent excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet:" The preceding data summary shows that the proposed floor area is 9.8% greater than the floor area on the approved plan, Therefore, this criteria is Met, 9, 'A reduction in the area reserved foe common open space and/or usable open space which reduces the open space area below the minimum required by this code or reduces the open space area by more than 10 percent;" There is no specific criteria in the CG zone for open space other than landscaping. The proposed plan increases the landscaped area compared to the approved plan; therefore, this criteria is Met, 10. "A reduction of project amenities below the minimum established by this code or by more than 10 percent where specified in the site plan; a. Recreational facilities; b. Screening; and/or c. Landscaping provisions; and" As noted above, recreational facilities are not required, and landscaping is increased as a result of the proposed plan, Screening is provided as required by Code in both instances. Therefore, this criteria is Met, 11. ':4 modification to the conditions' imposed at the time of site development review approval which are not the subject of I.1 through 10 above this subsection." No modification to the conditions of SDR 93,-0017 are proposed or required as a result of the revised site plan. Each condition, or group of related conditions, is addressed in the following section. This criteria is met. P:\WPbAt"A1 d- UI193O37.b51O5L1, }s o Modified Site Plan for City File SIR 93 -0017 Project Number 293037.05 January 23, 1996 Page 4 CONDITIONS OF S1 R 93 -0017 The conditions of the existing approval are generally applicable to both the existing approved plan and to the proposed plan. The approach to each is addressed as follows: 1. "Right-of-way shall be dedicated to the public along the frontage of the proposed SW 72nd Avenue right -of -way to increase the total of the dedicated and proposed right-of: way to a minimum of 30 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the centerline of the existing right -of -way of SW 72nd Avenue, 2. Standard street improvements, including concrete sidewalk, driveway apron, and street lighting shall be installed along the SW 72nd Avenue frontage. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to major collector street standards and shall conform to the alignment of existing adjacent improvements. 3. The existing traffic signal installation at the 72nd/Durham intersection shall be revised to provide signal controls for the north driveway from the site. Traffic markings on 72nd shall be revised to accommodate the projected traffic at the two site entrances." These three conditions are applicable to the proposed site plan, as well as to the approved plan, and will be met. 4. "The on -site driveway system shall be in accordance with the attached concept submitted by Mackenzie Engineering on December 1, 1993." This condition was intended to address concern raised by City staff with respect to the northerly site access opposite SW Durham Road, The modified plan reinforces the agreed- upon solution by providing adequate stacking distance on -site, and avoiding turn conflicts. This condition is met by the modified plan. S, "The intersection of 72nd/Bridgeport/Lower Boones Ferry shall be revised as shown in Figures 713 and 813 of the report titled, "Bingham Site Development Traffic Impact Analysis, "prepared byMackenzie Engineering Incorporated and dated September 17, 1993. The pedestrian bridge shown on Figure 8B shall not be required; however, pedestrian connections shall be constructed between the Tri A et Park-and-Ride lots and the crosswalk at the southbound freeway ramps. This work requires approval and permits from ODOT and Washington County, If requested by ODOT and Washington County, the City Engineer may require alternative improvements approved by ()DoT and Washington County in lieu of the improvements shown in Figures 7E and 813, provided that the alternative improvements are similar in cost and provide similar traffic c operational improvement. If requested by ODOT and Washington County, the City Engineer may accept payment of a fee in lieu of intersection improvements. T:1WPDATA\ 9G -01 O37.O5105L1.10 Modified Site Flan for City File SDR 931}017 Project Number 293037.05 January 23, 1996 . Page 5 The pedestrian connections to the Park - and -Ride lots will require approval from Tri-Met. If requested by Tri-Met, the City Engineer may delete the requirement for the pedestrian connections." The condition was worded to reflect the approach to accomplishing improvements to the 72nd/Lower Boones Ferry Road intersection that resulted from extensive study in 1993. It also was recognized that there were remaining issues, as well as the likelihood of changing circumstances prior to implementation, hence the City Engineer was given substantial latitude to approve revisions to the conceptual plan if there was agreement among the effected jurisdictions. The accompanying traffic study update addresses these issues and recommends intersection improvements consistent with the concept of the 1993 study, as well as with the comments by the effected jurisdictions as noted in the 1993 staff report. Therefore, concurrence among the jurisdictions, along with implementation of improvements, will ensure that this condition is met, 6, "Building permits will not be issued and construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until of er the Engineering Department has reviewed and approved the public improvements plans and a street opening permit or construction compliance agreement has been executed, A 100 percent performance assurance or letter of commitment, a developer - engineer agreement, the payment of a permit fee and a sign installation /streetlight fee are required, 7, The proposed privately operated and maintained sanitary sewer and storm drainage system plan profile details shall be provided as part of the public improvement plans, 8. The application shall demonstrate that storm drainage runoff can overflow from the site without significantly impacting the properties downstream, 9. Sanitary sewer and storm drainage details shall be provided as part of the public improvement plans. Calculations and a topographic map of the storm drainage basin and sanitary sewer service area shall be provided as a supplement to the public improvement plans. Calculations shall be based on full development of the servieeable area. The location and capacity of existing, proposed, and future lines shall be addressed. 10, The applicants shall provide connection of the proposed building to the public sanitary sewerage system. A connection permit is required to connect to the existing public sanitary sewer system. 11. The applicant shall provide for an -site water quality treatment as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No, 91-47. Submitted design calculations shall be in conformance with the general requirements of "infiltration facilities" and the specific requirements of "infiltration sumps" of Chapter 2 of Surface Water Quality Facilities Technical Guidance Handbook USA 1991, 12. The applicant shall obtain a ".Joint Permit "from the City of Tigard. This permit shall meet the requirements ofNPDES and Tualatin Basin Erosion Control Program. r:\ ATA\96- a1\93d37.o5%05Li,KS •r Modified Site Plan for City File SDI.93 -0017 Project Number 293037.05 January 23, 1 996 Page 6 13. The grading plan shall comply with Chapter 70 of the State of Oregon Structural Specialty Code." All of these conditions are equally applicable to the 1993 plan, as well as to the revised plan, and will be met through permitting, 14. "Revised site and landscaping plans shall be submitted for review by the Planning Division, Staff Contract; Will D Andrea. The revised plans shall include the following. a, Provision of eight disabled parking spaces, including one designated "van accessible." b. Provision of 361 required parking spaces, by providing for 25% compact spaces, redesigning the spaces along the east property line to 90 degrees angle parking or through a reciprocal parking agreement with Tri-Met. The reciprocal parking shall be utilized when the hours of operation do not overlap." The modified site plan designates eight disabled spaces as required. A total of 347 spaces is provided through a combination of designating compact spaces, eliminating the angle parking, and increasing site efficiency, Therefore, these conditions are met since the number of spaces provided exceeds the Code minimum, "c. Landscaping near driveway entrances shall meet visual clearance standards. d. Provision of an additional 12 parking lot trees in landscaped islands to be located within the interior parking lot area, Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands and shall be equally distributed and on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces. The minimum dimension of the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form ofwheel guard or curb." The accompanying landscape plan provides parking lot trees at the rate of 1 per 7 spaces, in planters in excess of three feet in width. Vision clearance areas are respected by the plant selection, These conditions are met, e. "Raised crosswalks or "speed humps" to delineate the two pedestrian crossings connecting to the ,rain entrance, " The pedestrian access system has been revised to be more functional and appealing. The driveway crossings will be delineated as required by this condition. f, "A plan which shows compliance with Community Development Code Chapter 18.116, Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage. The applicant shall choose one of the following four methods to demonstrate compliance; Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan or Franchised Hauler Review, and Sign -q/j'" This condition applies to the revised and approved plans, and will be addressed through construction permit documents. P: \WPbATA\9G- 0119103/.0$1051,1. 5 Modified Site Plan for City File SDR 93 -0017 Project Number 293037.05 January 23, 1996 Page 7 g. i "A free replacement plan providing for one -third of the removed trees or approximately 200 replacement trees. These shall be in addition to what is shown on the proposed landscaping plan. T o ensure adequate short-term screening, a majority of the replacement trees shall be of a significant size, Tree replacement shall be concentrated along the eastern property line to further buffer the proposed development from Interstate 5, The view corridors for signs may be identified by the applicant so that the plan selected provides the maximum amount of screening while allowing visual access to the wall signs after the trees mature." The accompanying landscape plan is in compliance with this condition, h. "Screening for service facilities and refuse containers." "Exterior elevation plans showing that the building height meets the maximum height requirement," Permit documents will reflect compliance with these conditions, which are not effected by the modified plans. j. "Wheel stops, at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall, along the pedestrian corridor linking the mai; entrance with the south parking lot. This provision will encourage the free flow ofpedestrian movement along this corridor." k, "Provision of five foot sidewalks along both access drives, The sidewalk on the south access should be located on the south side of the drive. The parking island shall include a pedestrian refuge and a crosswalk should be installed connecting the sidewalk and pedestrian refuge island, The sidewalk on the north access should be designed through the preserved stand of Douglas Firs." These two conditions are met by the modified site plan by realigning the pedestrian system to reduce vehiclelpedestdan conflicts, In addition to providing wheel stops, the internal pedestrian system is widened, and the main pedestrian connection is located on the south side of the south driveway as required. These conditions are met. 1. "Provision for the 18 Red Sunset Maple Street trees to be planted with a minimum caliper of two inches at four feet in height. " m. "Covered bicycle racks." These conditions are met as shown on accompanying plans, AWMATA19G -01 M031,p5W5t,1,1ts Modified Site Plan for City File SDR 93 -0017 Project Number 293037,05 January 23, 1996 Page 8 15. Separate tree removal permits are required for the building area and parking lot A tree protection plan shall be submitted and the applicant will install tree protection fencing prior to the start of construction, It should be placed as far from the trees as is practical, but not closer to the tree than one foot behind any necessary excavation line. Any necessary intrusion into the tree protection area must be with approval of the Planning Department. When the clearing limits are determined and staked, a tree condition analysis and program of therapeutic care of the protected trees will be required. A revised tree inventory of the parking lot area shall be submitted. An arborist report and protection plan identifying locations suitable for additional parking lot tree retention and protection shall also be submitted, It should also identify potential trees to be used as replacement trees." While this condition applies equally to the approved and modified plans, a preliminary report from Bill Owen (Arborist) accompanies this letter to demonstrate that the initial steps have been undertaken to address this condition. A complete report, along with supporting information as required by this condition, will be submitted along with tree removal permits. This overview and code compliance description shows that the modification to the plans approved in City File SDR 93 -0017 should be considered "minor" as defined by Code, and processed administratively as provided by Section 18.120.070 of the Code. We are now preparing the additional documents required by SDR 93 -0017, as well as construction pernut documents, with the intent of filing for initial permits in early February. Therefore, we would appreciate your comments on the above analysis as soon as possible, We would be pleased to meet with you to discuss any of the issues in more detail, Thank you for your assistance, Sincerely, Lans Stout LS/ls c: Stuart Bingham - Bingham Construction St ;ye Neville New & Neville PAMATAVO6- 01193037.0SVAL1,10 t WILLIAM L. OWEN and ASSOCIATES Tree and. Landscape Consulting Services P.O. BOX 641, PORTLAND, OREGON 97207 503/222 -7007 January 12, 1996 Lans Stout Mackenzie Engineering, Inc, PO Box 69039 Portland, OR 97201-0039 RE: Bingham Development - Tigard, Oregon/ Tree Preservation Consultation Dear Mr, Stout: I have been retained by Bingham Construction Company (Stuart Bingham) to serve as Arboricultural Consultant on the subject project for the purpose of tree preservation during construction, and monitoring for a full year following construction. Pursuant to that, and after discussions with you regarding the project, I have done the following as preliminary work: 1) Reviewed the current plot plan and original plot plan showing tree preservation areas by dotted line circled on the plans by you for the development. 2) Inspected the site trees visually and paid particular attention to the locations marked for tree preservation, both as to suitability and as to feasibility for preservation of the subject trees considering the overall construction project, Based on the preliminary work recited above, I can make the following preliminary comments regarding impact on the trees on the project: 1) As numbered on the enclosed plot plan, the areas of particular concern for preservation of trees reflect a reasonable approach to specimens which are, overall, as good quality across the board as any on the site, In particular, groupings 1, 3, 11, 13 would provide for preservation of significant numbers of good to very good specimens of trees on the site particularly since many are border trees and make stro , aboricultural statements, at the northeast, northwest, and southeast corners of the project particularly. Other trees and groupings shown for preservation are also of significance to the site. INSPECTION, DIAGNOSIS AND EVALUATION OF TREES, SHRUBS AND RELATED PLANTINGS, CONSULTATION WITH RESPECT TO PLANTING, TRANSPLANTING, PRESERVATION, MAINTENANCE AND ARBOREAL PLANNING. COMPREHENSIVE LOSS OR DAMAGE RI,PORTS. DULY SANCTIONED APPRAISALS FOR LEGAL OR CONTRACTUAL PURPOSES. LEGALLY ACCEPTABLE TESTIMONY IN COURT CASES. 4 •F Lans Stout Pw 2 January 12, 1996 2) The enclosed copy of my letter to Bingham Construction regarding my services provides a description of the kinds of services which I will be performing on the project, as you know from our discussions. In that regard, the specifics of preservation, tree by tree and location by location, on the site will be addressed as the project proceeds, beginning with construction fencing which will be placed early on, prior grading on the project, around trees and groups of trees slated for preservation. 3) In reference to certain trees marked to be preserved, as shown on the drawings in parking lot planting islands, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 are examples, the same process will be followed, preliminarily. As construction proceeds, judgements can be made on site as to the preservability of the specimens, and as to the feasibility of preservation, given the fact that surrounding trees will have ber, removed and the isolated trees, if retained, will be in open areas and more vulnerable to blow -down in a way that they are not at present. It should be stressed that in situations of this kind we pay very particular attention to the construction impact o n single trees, minimizing it in every way possible, and making every reasonable assurance that the tree, if retained, is stable in its anchoring and a specimen suitable for retention, with a prognosis for stability and performance that is reasonable. Every effort will be made to do that on this site. (It should further be mentioned that in some municipalities now, the stress is strongly on groups of trees to be preserved over single trees, where preservation of a single tree might in fact create a hazard, long term, due to instability and exposure to stresses not present prior to construction.) With regard to #3 above, you will note in my letter. to Bingham Construction that I provide a full year of monitoring tree performance following construction. This is in part for the specific purpose of checking on single trees. as well as groves of trees, for any signs of instability or imminent hazard to persons and property below. By following this procedure, I can assure you that tree preservation can be maximized with stable specimens, with an excellent prognosis for future performance. 5) As a general statement in summary of this preliminary report, I can say that the stand throughout is of good to very good quality as to size, configuration, and general condition, based on a visual inspection. The remaining trees should tolerate the construction impact. My procedures are to be on site and /or in close contact with the projei,t manager as well as the general foreman and equipment operators during the grading for buildings and parking lot areas, and construction itself We then deal situationally with trees and tree problems, always with the goal of preserving the specimen if at all possible, Adequate records are kept of all this activity. WLO & Assoc 119579 i► Lang Stout Page 3 January 12, 1996 Based on the information that 1 have at this time and my preliminary inspection of the trees on the site, 1 believe the foregoing is sufficient for your needs, Please let me know if you need any additional information in any particular and it will be supplied, forthwith, Thank you very much. Very truly yours, William. L. Owen, B.S., M.A,, C.A. American Society of Consulting Arborists #114 Bncl cc: Stuart Bingham • Bingham Construction WLb & Assaa 119579 , ' ;e • WILLIAM L. OWED] and ASSOCIATES Tree and Landscape Consulting Services P..Oy. BOX 641, PORTLAND, OREGON 97207 x}e503/222 -7007 January 12, 1996 Mr. Stuart Bingham Bingham Construction Company 3939 NW St, Helens Road Portland, OR 97210 RE: Bingham Development - Tigard, Oregon/ Tree Preservation Consultation Dear Mr, Bingham: As .S0 Q■ ;AN This to acknowledge that you have today by telephone retained me as Arboricultural Consultant on the subject project, As we agreed my services for the project will include but will not be limited to the following: 1) Develop tree preservation reports as may be required by the City of Tigard for design review/ building permit purposes. 2) Meet and work with all contrac+ors on the project whose work may affect tree safety and preservation, including all pre - construction meetings, meetings on site, and any other meetings as may be necessary to tree preservation. 1) Meet as necessary with the project manager and/or job superintendent throughout the project to maximize tree preservation practices. In this process 1 will develop on- site situational plans and solutions for tree preservation as may be necessary. (See letter to Stout, enclosed,) 4) Work closely with the City of Tigard staff representative to the project to meet all arboricultural requirements for tree preservation, 5) Keep a log of my activity on the project and file memos as necessary for a proper paper trail. 6) Perform any other activities which may be necessary as arboricultual consultation requirements on the project. �.. INSPECTION, DIAGNOSIS AND EVALUATION Or TREES, SHRUBS AND RELATED PLANTINGS. CONSUL'T'ATION WITH RESPECT TO PLANTING, TRANSPLANTING, PRESERVATION, MAINTENANCE AND ARBOREAL PLANNING;, COMPREHENSIVE VE LOSS OR DAMAGE REPORTS. DULY SANCTIONED APPRAISALS POR LEGAL OR CONTRACTUAL PURPOSES, LEGALLY ACCEPTABLE TESTIMONY IN COURT CASES. . , E .7.7; . le 0•', Mr, Stuart Bingham Page 2 January 12, 1996 7) Monitor the project for one full growing season after construction is completed. The total cost for my services on this project will be not -to- exceed $3,000.00, 1 will bill for the work monthly as the work is done. 1 enclose a copy of my resume for your files. 1 appreciate very much the opportunity to work with you and Mackenzie Saito on this project. The site has challenges and provides a great opportunity to retain a number of beautiful trees and make this commercial development more attractive when completed. Please let me know immediately if you have any questions. Thank you very much, Wry truly yours, William L. Owen, B,S,, M.A., C.A. American Society of Consulting Arborists #114 encl cc: Fans Stout - Mackenzie Engineering WLO & Assoc #9579 01 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON February 15, 1996 TO: William D'Andrea FROM: Greg Beriy00 RE: REQUEST FOR A MINOR MODIFICATION TO SDR 94 -17 esCri on; The Applicant's proposal has been modified by changing the use from a 68,000 sq. ft. grocery store to a 25,000 sq. ft. bookstore, 41,000 sq. ft. home interiors store, and 9,000 sq. ft. of uncommitted retail. Findings. The requested approval may be approved upon a finding that the proposed modification is not a major modifications in accordance with subsection 18.120.070B of the CDC. Item 6 of that subsection is a "change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected". The modified site plan shows that the proposed access to SW 72nd has been relocated about 1; ' south. Since this increases the distance between the access and the intersection of concern, no adverse affect to off- site traffic is expected. Moreover, there are no drive ways along the opposite side of SW 72nd creating alignment concerns. Item 7 is "an increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and the increase can be expected to exceed 20 vehicles per day. " The Applicant's revised traffic study successfully shows that although the total retail space is being increased, traffic will be reduced. This is largely accomplished by the low trip generation of the home interiors store. Item 11 is a "modification to the conditions..,of...approval ". The currently proposed utilities and public improvements do not require modifications of the conditions of approval. R commendation, The Engineering Department has no objection to the proposed Minor Modification. A'.. QYED.: Acti . City Engineer • January 19, 1996 Form 734.450 (11.')41 )Ca\O `i 2.5 \996 City of Tigard Attention: Greg Berry 13125 SW Hall Blvd, Tigard, OR 97223 -8199 Subject: Bingham Site Development Revised Traffic Mitigation Proposal 72nd Avenue near Lower Boones Ferry Road DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Region 1 PILE CODE: The proposed traffic mitigation measures outlined in Mackenzie Engineering's January 11, 1996 letter to you for the subject development are acceptable to ODOT. These measures involve providing additional lanes on the north and west approaches to the 72nd Avenue /Lower Boones Ferry Road /Bridgeport Road intersection, revising the signal timing and phasing at the intersection, closing the east crosswalk, and revising the signal installation as necessary to accommodate these changes, The signal revision plans will need to be reviewed and approved by Washington County and ODOT prior to implementation, If you have any questions, please call me at 731 -8219 or Alan Troyer, ODOT's signal manager for the area at 731 -8213, /".? Martin Jen Id Senior Transportation Analyst cc: Laurie Nicholson Alan Troyer Bob Doran Tom Wolch, Washington County Brent Ahrend, Mackenzie Engineering bingham 123 liNV Flanders Portland, OR 97209-4037 (503) 731 -8200 PAX (503) 731 -8259 January 18, 1996 Mr. Brent Ahrend MacKenzie Engineering Incorporated 0690 SW Bancroft Street P.O. Box 69039 Portland, Oregon 97201 -0039 RE: Bingham Site Development Revised Traffic Mitigation Proposal .0 2, 0 I have reviewed the information provided to Washington County concerning the above -noted development proposal and have the following comments and questions. Washington County is in agreement that mitigation measures are necessary for the intersection of 72nd and Lower Boones Ferry Road. We also are in agreement that any improvement to the existing intersection is interim and the ultimate solution is to realign 72nd to move it further away from the Interstate 5 interchange. I will comment separately on the traffic analysis and design issues. The following comments and questions concern the pttraf ae. analysis: r` 1. The 1993 report prepared by MacKenzie Engineering indicated that traffic volumes were growing at a rate of 9.5 percent, yet a 3.5 percent growth rate was assumed for in process traffic. Has traffic growth slowed in this area? 2. Some of the traffic movements -are lower in the 1995 count as compared to the 1993 count, Is this related to the relocation of Costco or have traffic counts generally dropped in this area? 3. The 1993 trip generation calculations were based upon a grocery store of similar size in the Seattle area. MacKenzie Engineering also found that the trip eneration was very close to the shopping center rate in the ITE manual. he December 1995 trip generation indicates a lower trip generation using retail, yet the building footprint in the 1995 study is largerWashington County is interested in what specific land use is being proposed and what ITE land use code is being used for the trip generation calculations. The following comments and suggestions concern the design of the intersection mitigation: 1. Due to the low volume of the northbound left turn movement, Washington County agrees with the concept of running the north -south pedestrian movement concurrently with both the northbound and southbound vehicle Department of Land Use & Transportation Engineering ,services 155 North First Avenue, Suite 350.17, Iiillsboro, Oregon 97124 FAX #:(501) 693 -4412 Phone: (503) 693 -4563 Mr. Brent Ahrend Page 2 January 18, 1996 Subject: Bingham Site Development Revised Traffic Mitigation Proposal movements. Washington County suggest. that use of "Left Turns Yield to Pedestrians" signing may be appropriate in this situation. 2. For the westbound and southbound left turn movements it may be worthwhile to investigate the possibility of shared left - through lanes. 3. An overlap for the westbound right turn movement if not present should be added. 4. Advance directional signing mounted on the signal mast arm or span wires should be incorporated into the design for the southbound left turn. This will allow motorists to get into the proper lane before making the turn. This was mentioned in the 1993 MacKenzie report and should help operation of the intersection. Washington County would appreciate a response to the above noted concerns prior to approval of any plans. Please call with any questions at 693 -4817. Sincerely, Thomas E. Wolch, P.E. Traffic Engineer cc: Greg Berry, City of Tigard Allan Troyer, ODDr Marty Jensvold, ODOT X:1...1ENGIWPSHAWTONW1tINGST01,WP5 TW :hs MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • SURVEYING • TRANSPORTATION 0690 S.W. BANCROFT STREET • P.0. BOX 69039 PORTLAND, OREGON 97201 -0039 • (503) 224-9560 • FAX (503) 228 -12$5 January 23, 1996 Washington County Department of Land. Use & Transportation Engineering Services Attention: Tom Wolch 155 North First Avenue, Suite 350 -17 Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 Re: Bingham Site Development Traffic Analysis MEI Project Number 293037.04 Dear Tom: 0 2. S \ ()9 Thank you for your continents on the proposed traffic mitigation measures for the intersection of Boones Ferry Road with SW 72nd Avenue, Design of the intersection improvements will take place in the future, but 1 would like to address your concerns about the traffic analysis at this time, As you are aware, the original Bingham site development plan called for a 68,000 s.f. grocery store, A traffic study was prepared by MEI in September of 1993 which reflected the grocery store development, The 1993 report indicated a growth rate of 9,5% per year based upon counts taken in July and August of 1993 and June of 1990. Traffic counts were conducted by MEI staff at the intersections of Boones Ferry Road at 72nd Avenue and the I-5 interchange, and at 72nd Avenue with Durham Road, in the Fall of 1995 and January 1996. Based upon the average growth rate from June of 1990 to the current counts, traffic volumes have been increasing at a lower rate of 3,5%, In fact, traffic volumes have decreased at the intersections of Boones Ferry with 72nd Avenue and the southbound ramp by 300 vehicles during the PM peak hour, Traffic counts were conducted by MEI staff at the intersections of Boones Ferry Road at 72nd Avenue and the 1 -5 intcrci.ange, and at 72nd Avenue with Durham Road, in November 1995 and January 1996, The counts indicate that the total intersection volumes at the Boones Ferry /72nd intersection have decreased, while the eastbound and 'southbound volumes have increased, This may be, in part, due to Costco moving and improvements occurring to the interchange at Nyberg Road which was under constriction at the time of the previous counts from July 1993. Currently, the site is planned for 75,000 s.f, of retail. Specific tenants include a 25,000 s.f, bookstore, a 41,000 s,f, store specializing in bedroom, bath, and similar interior home products, and an additional 9000 s.f. of retail space not yet committed. Trip generation estimates for the currently proposed development utilized ITE rates for a Furniture Store (890) for the interiors store and Shopping Center (820) for the bookstore and lease space. These uses are anticipated to generate considerably less PM peak hour traffic than a grocery store, even with a larger footprint. The total trip generation for each development is listed in the table below, VAWPDATA196,0119:i01i.0412 L1.8k Tom Wolch Project Number 293037.04 January 23, 1996 Page 2 Trig Generation Comparison Development Size NM Code ADT AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Enter Exit Enter 1993 Study Grocery Store 68 ksf 820 5554 82 47 294 294 1995 Proposed Development :, ' +, Ora Interiors eiP 41 ksf 890 220 7 12 *Book more co � d e 25 ksf 820 2648 40 24 121 121 Lease Space to. t' 9 ksf 820 953 14 8 44 44 Total MEM , 3821 59 34 172 177 cA 4, The current development proposal assumes a pass -by percentage of 20% and diverted link of 15 %. The 1993 study assumed 25% and 10% respectively for the grocery store. New trips were assumed to be 65% of the total for both scenarios. I hope this information addresses your questions about the specific site development plans and trip generation. Please call me if you have any additional questions. Sincerely, 444A5Vadk- Brent Ahrend Traffic Analyst BTAJsk c; Lans Stout, Dave Larson - MEI Greg Berry - City of Tigard Allan Troyer, Mary Jensvold ODOT FAWPDATA196- O119303/.041231,1,S1C MACKENZIE r 4GINEERING CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • SURVEYING 0690 S v ",' BANCROFT STREET • P.O BOX PORTLANCD. OREGON 97201-0039 • (503) January 11, 1996 City of Tigard Attention: Greg Berry 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 -8199 Re: Bingham Site Development Revised Traffic Nhtigation Proposal MEI Project Number 293037.04 Dear Greg: INCORPORATED • TRANSPORTATION 69039 224 -0560 • FAX (503) 228x1285 Mackenzie Engineering Incorporated (MEI) has revised the traffic mitigation proposal for the intersection of Lower Boones Ferry Road with SW 72nd Avenue and Bridgeport Road. A more detailed analysis of the intersection's signal operation and coordination with the 1 -5 interchange signals was undertaken at the request of the Oregon Department of Transportation and Washington County. Based upon these comments, several changes were made to improve the intersection operation and reduce vehicle queuing. Traffic Counts Additional traffic turning movement counts were conducted at the intersection of Lower Boones Ferry Road with the southbound I-5 ramps during the AM peak hour and at the northbound ramps for both the AM and PM peak hours. These counts are provided at the request of ODOT and have been used to reevaluate the signal progression and estimate vehicle queuing. Figures 3A and 3B present the existing traffic volumes for these and the other study area intersections. Combined traffic volumes are presented in Figures 9A and 9B which include existing traffic, background growth at 3.5% for one year traffic from two in- process projects, and the Bingham site traffic. Crosswalks Some concerns were raised by ODOT about the crosswalk on the east side of the intersection not being provided with adequate crossing time and being operated with conflicting southbound left turns. MEI proposed pinning the east crosswalk with northbound traffic only, which would require an additional 7 seconds of green time for the northbound phase. The additional green time would need to be taken from the prior southbound phase, subsequent westbound phase, or a combination of the two. The net result would be some disruption of progression on the coordinated signal system. Traffic counts conducted by MEI in November 1995 indicated that only one pedestrian used this crosswalk during the AM peak hour and five pedestrians used it during the PM peak hour, indicating that a maximum z of five out of 47 signal cycles per hour would be disrupted. Mitigation measures for the intersection proposed in 1993 by MEI included removal of the east crosswalk. At that time, TriMct was opposed to the crosswalk removal because ofmorning pedestrians walking from the park - and -ride lot on the north side of Lower Boones Ferry Road to the south lot to F A P D ATA196 -01!.9 3 0 3 /. 0411 L 1. S 1C • Greg Berry Project Number 293037.04 January 11, 1996 Page 2 catch buses, TriMet is now picking up passengers at the north lot, which has significantly reduced the number of pedestrians crossing Boones Ferry in the morning. Evening buses have always dropped off passengers at the north lot, Both ODOT and TriMet have indicated a willingness to allow removal of the east crosswalk. A crosswalk is provided 140 feet to the east at the I.5 southbound ramp for crossing Lower Boones Ferry Road Removing the crosswalk is not necessary to implement MEI's recommended phasing and timing for the 72nd Avenue intersection, but it will provide additional capacity and eliminate the need for disrupting the signal progression_ ODOT has indicated that the two remaining north and west crosswalks could utilize two signal phases to provide adequate crossing times, The proposed phasing and progression would allow this to occur, Progression Analysis The current signal coordination plan for the intersections of Lower Boones Ferry Road with SW 72nd Avenue and the 1-5 interchange was reevaluated, Passer software was used to determine if a better coordination. plan could be implemented. The findings indicated that a slightly longer cycle length of 80 to 85 seconds and a band speed of 35 mph would work with the same phasing as is currently being utilized. Capacity analysis calculations using ICS software revealed that the intersections would, in fact, not work as well as the existing coordination. Field observations revealed good progression at the three intersections except fbr eastbound traffic between 72nd Avenue and the southbound ramps, The current operation provides an additional eight seconds of green time if vehicles are detected in either turn lane. The outside left turn lane is underutilized which causes the left turns in the inside lane to require the additional eight seconds, Reducing this time would improve eastbound operation, but would cause some ,.dditional queuing in the westbound left turn lanes, This would also cause motorists to distribute more evenly in the two lanes. Releasing the eastbound traffic earlier would cause it to arrive at the northbound signal just Dior to the green light. MEI continues to recommend maintaining the existing coordination plan with some adjustments to the 72nd Avenue intersection phasing and tinting, Figures 10A 10C present the time -space diagrams for the existing and proposed AM and PM signal progression. The AM operation differs from the PM in that it provides an additional four seconds of green time for the heavier AM westbound traffic. The northbound and eastbound phases are reduced by two seconds each. This provides two seconds for the queue to clear before the progressed platoon arrives, and extends the green time for an additional two seconds. IEI recommends operation of the westbound right turn lane as an overlap during the southbound phase. This will improve the capacity of the right turn lane and reduce the required queuing. Capacity of the F: \WPbATA\9641\93037.O4\t 1L1.S1C ti Greg Berry Project Number 293037,04 January 11, 1996 Page 3 right turn lane would be somewhat less without the overlap and queues would be longer. A high number of right turns on red would be expected without the overlap. Capacity Analysis Capacity calculations were conducted for the existing and proposed signal progression using HCS software. Results are presented in the table below. All intersections are expected to operate at acceptable levels of service with the proposed progression and timing, with the exception of the northbound ramp intersection. With the future AM peak hour volumes and existing geometry and timing, westbound through traffic will be just above capacity, and northbound left turns will be nearly 30% above capacity. These capacity constraints will occur regardless of development on the Bingham site. This can be mitigated by providing two northbound left turn lanes and increasing the westbound green time by three seconds. This time would be taken from the eastbound left turn movement. Both the AM and PM operation would benefit from the timing change. Results of the capacity analysis for this improvement are presented in the table below. Table 1 Intersection Capacity and Level of Service Future Traffic Volumes Intersection Time Period Scenario Existing Configuration Proposed Configuration Proposed + NB Ramp C Boones Ferry/ SW 72nd Avenue AM 0.79- 16.8 -C 0,61.43.8 -B 0,61 - 13.8 -C PM >1.0 -F 0.81-19.2-C 0.81-19.2-C Booties Ferry/ Southbound Ramps M 0.61 - 12.043 0.61-12.0-13 0.6142.0 -B PM 0.77 49.8 -C 0.77 - 19.8 -C 0.7749.8-C E Booties Ferry/ Northbound Ramps p AM >1.0 -F >1.0 -F 0.7746.8 -C PM 0.84- 16.6 -C 0.84- 16.6 -C 0.80 - 14.6 -B Vehicle Queuing The anticipated queue lengths at the 72nd Avenue and southbound ramp intersections were checked to ensure that vehicles would not block the intersection operation as is currently occurring at 72nd Avenue with southbound traffic, Table 2 below summarizes the queuing with existing operation and the proposed changes at the 72nd Avenue intersection. • VAWITATA196- 0119303>.04111L 1.5110 Greg Berry Project Number 293037.04 January 11, 1996 Page 4 Table 2 Vehicle Queuing Calculation Summary Future Traffic Volumes Intersection Direction Scenario Existing Configuration Proposed Configuration AM PM AM PM C Boones Ferry/ SW 72nd Avenue WB LT 100 100 150 125 TH 100 100 150 _..�.__. 150 RT 125 75 125 75 D Boones Ferry/ Southbound Ramps WB LT 75 150 75 150 BB TH 250 400 175 250 RT 100 150 75 100 Queuing calculations assume operation of all phases at each intersection, maximum green time for westbound left turns at the southbound ramp, queues clear during each phase, and 50% of right turns arriving at a red light turn right on the red light. All calculations were rounded to the nearest 25 feet. As the table indicates, the proposed configuration will increase westbound queues at 72nd Avenue slightly, and will decrease eastbound queues at the southbound ramp. Calculations are attached. I hope this additional analysis addresses the concerns of the City of Tigard, ODOT, and Washington County. If you have any additional questions or concerns, please call me. Sincerely, Brent Ahrend ETA/sk Enclosures c, mans Stout, Dave Larson - MEI Allan Troyer, Marty Jensvold - ODOT Torn Wolch y Washington County F:\WPDATA196 -0 1\9303Th411.L1,51t 1,y ' DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED BY: BTA DATE: JOB NUMBER: 293037.04 SHEET OF EXISTING LANE CONFIGURATIONS MACKENZIC ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVE° rtkartnymAiTimittGaINIVG OVUM taw MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Civil • Structural • Transportation 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street • P.O. Box 69059 Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 Phone: (503)224-9560 go FAX: (503)228-1285 DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED BY: BTA DATE: JOB NUMBER: 293037,04 OF 0 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED roxlmwmarIc■louivr inn !XII 11/0P4 141P WO PROPOSED LANE CONFIGURATIONS MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED eta � Structural e Trontportotion 0690 S. W. gancrott Street ill P.O. Sox 69039 Portland, Oregon 97201-0035 Phone: (503)224-9560 • PAX: (503)228-1285 DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED BY: BTA DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1995 JOB NUMBER: 293037.02 SHEET OF © MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 195 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED enosteActl.stwroromfide red swots 14t4 EXISTING TRAFFIC AM PEAK HOUR MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED CIO 6 Structural • Transportation 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street I PO, 8ox 65039 Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 Phone: (503)224-9560 • FAX: (503)228-1285 NOT TO SCALE Durham Rood 2 t \'‘ 233 287 Uk 426 tr.) 840-9- 545 41.---• 530 314—" 1246--0. FIGURE 3B DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED BY: BTA DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1995 JOB NUMBER: 293037,02 SHEET OF © MACKENZIE EN('''` ,' RING INCORPORATED 1995 ALL RIGt. .2SERVED EXISTING TRAFFIC PM PEAK HOUR MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Civil 8 Structural • Transportation 0690 S. W. Oancroft Street 0 P.O. box 69039 Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 Phone: (503)224-9560 FAX: (503)228-1285 #4j01/041`sehrt1A.,:di DNB MIMI% 4O 111.00 NOT TO SCALE Durham Road B SI YES 8 --'r 4— 31 26—. ,r-- 15 FIGURE 4A DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED BY: EFTA DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1995 JOB NUMBER: 293037,02 SHEET OF © MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVE° BACKGROUND TRAFFIC GROWTH 3.5% AM PEAK HOUR MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED cm! N Structural r Transportation 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street • P.O. Box 69039 Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 Phone: (503)224-9560 • PAX: (503)228- 1285 DRAWN BY: DM8 CHECKED BY: B TA DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1995 JOB NUMBER: 293037,02 SHEET OF © MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED t930704 tiVILM137FGOIDWG Dal 01109/911 13ACKGROUND TRAPPIO GROWTH 3.5% PM PEAK HOUR MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED civil 6 Structure! 6 Transportetton 0690 S. W. 8encroft Street • P.O. tax 69039 Porilcind, Oregon 97201-0039 Phone: (503)224-9560 • FAX: (503)228-1285 „ DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED BY: BTA DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1995 JOB NUMBER: 293037.02 SHEET OF (01 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORA1ED 199$ ALL RIGHTS RESERVED IN-PROCESS TRAPFIC AM PEAK HOUR MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Civil • Structural • Transportation 0690 S. W ancroft Street * P.O. Box 69039 Portlk.Ind, Oregon 97201-0039 Phone: (503)224-9560 • FAX: (503)226-1285 e9303704■CIVILke31rculA.Vai DM 01/09/06 DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED BY: BTA DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1995 JOB NUMBER: 293037.02 SHEET OF C) MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESLRVED IN-PROCESS TRAFFIC PM PEAK HOUR MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Civil a Structural Transportation 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street P.O. Box 69039 Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 Phone: (503)224-9560 • PAX: (503)2213-1265 wativiAavtorotuvo ill, 01109196 NOT TO SCALE 689 ---+- 255-,� 238 _ 1 **-1000 788.0- 440 FIGURE 6A DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED BY: BTA DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1995 JOB NUMBER: 29303 7,02 SHEET OF' BASE 1996 TRAFFIC AM PEAK HOUR MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 0 MACKENZIE CNGINE.ERING INCORPORATEC) 1995 ALL NIGHTS RESCRVECI et303704 \CzVnAtt37rGOLDVG DtUI 0110946 16,16 1100 Civil . Structural o Transportation 0690 So W1 Bancroft Street i P.O. Box 69039 Portland, Oregon 97201 -0039 Phone: (503)224 -9560 a FAX: (503)228 -1285 NOT TO SCALE 397--tr 531 1315---0- orr 549 FIGURE 6B DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED BY: BTA DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1995 JOB NUMBER: 293037.02 SHEET or © MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 199S ALL RIGHTS RESERVED BASE 1996 TRAFFIC PM PEAK HOUR MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED civil • Structural • Transportation 0690 5. W. ttanoroff Street • P.O. 13ox Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 Phone: (503)224-9560 • PAX: (503)228-1285 e9t:3704■CIVIL \03/FGOINCI 1$42 01M14 16.33 1100 NOT TO SCALE Durham Road 5--*- 10 30 b\ t P Lo to o FIGURE 7A DRAWN EY: DMB CHECKED BY: BTA DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1995 JOB NUMBER: 293037.02 SHEET OF © MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 29303764NCIVII,W1FGAING DM W/09/% 130 TRIP DISTRIBUTION - NEW TRIPS AM PEAK HOUR MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Civil • Structural • Transportation 0690 S. W. tlancroft Street • P.O 4 llox 69039 PortIond, Oregon 97201-0039 Phone: (503)224-0560 * FAX: (503)228-1285 • •,.' , •'•• DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED BY: BTA DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1995 JOB NUMBER: 293057.02 SHEET OF © MACKENZIE ENCINEERINC INCORPORATED 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED TRIP DISTRIBUTION -- NEW TRIPS PM PEAK HOUR MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED CMI Structural 0 Transportation 0690 S. W. bancroft Street • P.O. box 6909 Portland Oregon 97201-0039 Phone: (503)224-5560 • FAX: (503)228-1285 030370ACWIL41:137R1191WG 13411 01/09/96 NOT TO SCALE Durham Rood FIGURE 70 DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED BY: BTA DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1995 JOB NUMBER:293037,02 SHEET OF © MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 1595 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED L+*93or 4`CIV10 37rG1C.nvG D 4ZI 01 /09 /% IILOU TRIP DISTRIBUTION — PASS—BY TADS AM PEAK HOUR MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Civil • Structural • Transportation 0G90 S. W. Bancroft Street I P•b, box 69039 Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 Phone: (503)224 -95G0 • PAX: (503)228 -1255 .• /ray C ',6■\NN BY: DMB C ECKED BY: BIA DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1995 JOB NUMBER: 293037.02 SHEET OF @ MACKENZIE ENGINEER,NO INCORPORATED 1095 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED E910704■CIV037FOILOWG MB 01/09/S4 TFIIP DISTRIBUTION - PASS-BY TRIPS PM PEAK HOUR MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Civil • Structural • Transportation 0690 S. W. 13dr:croft Street * P.O. Dox 69039 Portlaricl, Oregon 97201-0039 Phone: (503)224-9560 • FAX: (503)228-1285 ts==. ra, m FIGURE 7E DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED BY: BTA DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1995 JOB NUMBER: 293037,02 SHEET OF C) MACKENZIE ENGINEERINO INCORPORATED 1095 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED rnes-na lymo37fof .tve Dill! 01/09/96 i522 1d.00 TRIP DISTRIBUTION -- DIVERTED LINK TRIPS AM PEAK HOUR MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Civil d Structural • Transportation 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street • P.O. Box 690 .59 Phone: Portland, 50.3)224- +9+S601 e 0039 FAX: (503)226-1285 s • • FIGURE 7F DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED BY: BTA DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1995 JOB NUMBER: 293037.02 SHEET OF © MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 9303764 \CIVIL■037tOMING Old 0i109/96 15.23 itt00 1111114111101111.11111111. TRIP DISTRIEIUTION - DIVERTED LINK TRIPS PM PEAK HOUR MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED CIVII • Structural Transportation 0690 S. W. 0ancroft Street P.O. tax 6903g Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 Phone: (503)224-9560 FAX: (503)228-1285 eirr••••••••••••*1...... fl NA' 1.1 to NOT TO SCALE Durham Road ONIRIMMI DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED BY: BTA DATE: OCTOBER 31, 195 JOB NUMBER: 293037,02 SHEET OE © MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED e9313704SCWILY737FG13titiiti )261, 01101/96 JUG') MAO FIGURE 8A TOTAL TRIP ASSIGNMENT AM PEAK HOUR MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED CIO d Structural 0 Transportotion 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street 6 P.O. Box 69039 Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 Phone: (503)224-9560 • FAX: (503)228-1285 NOT TO SCALE Durham Road 10---o- 18 Ae-- 42 t\ tt co co to 80 (4) (7) FIGURE 8B DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED BY: BTA DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1995 JOB NUMBER: 293037.02 SHEET OF © MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED TOTAL TRIP ASSIGNMENT PM PEAK HOUR MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED civil 6 Structural • Transportation 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street • P.O. Box 69059 Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 Phone: (503)224-9560 • PAX: (503)228-1285 t13037041CIVIL‘031rGeaDWG D1/$/96 15.31 1.1.00 �Yt to r co 3 3 8 In o b0 4 17 U 1 4 IY) td- N 15 763 224- --4 250 5 -�v e- 488 t NI N &O try 11 NOT TO SCALE Durham Road 11� 517 ..-1O18 259- .4-- 440 (D) FIGURE 9A DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED BY: BTA DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1995 JOB NUMBER :293037.02 SHEET OF © MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 704NCIVIL•037FGMING flock Oti09/96 it43 COMBINED TRAFFIC AM PEAK HOUR MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED ChM + Structural c TrdnsPortation 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street o P.C. Box 69039 Portiand, 0regon 97201-0039 Phone: (503)224 -9560 • rAX: (503)228 -1285 It • 0 0 to 0 r- CNI I 44 10 —4- 276 17) 1.W.WIWINMODY•■■•• 12 18 42 LO 21 85 • • NOT TO SCALE Durham Rood 1h 00 t. tO (\I 29—" *•—. 346 488 -re--- 295 2 434 t CNI 00 In It) 1017 —1.- 369,—* `..6011.1MIM611104111 1'.• 0 U" ••-'' t"••• 630 5,49 429—" 1333 860 FIGURE 9B 0 DRAWN DY: DMB CHECKED DY: BTA DATE: OCTODER 31, 1995 JOB NUMBER: 29303.'7,02 SHEET OF MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED t930,110.4‘CiVIL 037td9t1)WG 041i tilit9/06 115d4 1,11.00 .,.!„ • ' " , COMBINED TRAPPIC PM PEAK HOUR MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Civil 6 Structural 6 Transportation 0690 S, W. Oa ncroft Street � P.O , 8ox 69039 Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 Phone: (503)224-9560 PAX: (503)228-1285 A r . A 1111110111401111111 il1ildj11H1111111 €111 €llillllilillil1111111 1i11tllldll1li11111111 't!ltillillil €11191!!; 1111111m01(111111 1111111H10101111"1 Illillil! €€11111111111 IIIHI Ilt11oU111111 tlRtll111i11t11111!!I i111lilPttittll 111111111101011IIIII 11111; 1111111 1111401111111 111111/1141011111111 1111411110I1111111 1llllilit,lj11111t111 t4411I1lIlli ji11111111 11 itt€!11l1lliI!!lllij 111111111,! 1111111111 Ili HIIillilllitliltj iIIitl,II l!Ht1 111111/11,1 1111111111 111 €1111 ;u,€IIEl11 111111104_11111111 €I 1 1!11111 ;3llS� 11114!, Ill (13111111111 • 3tdlllli1111ij1111i y llddt 1 111{1111!1 Iliil1111111 i'II1llilll! I 111111184111111111 i 'MU II HI% I1II11�111l111111I 11 11t11tIIIl11j11111 1 tl l tltiiiiiii III IIIIIIH, !11!11" H1 Milli fun 111 1111 llij 111111 IHI 111 111114:1 111 1!!I ;11111111111111 1111 ili 1 Ilililii; 1!1}711111 i11111111 1111! gill! IIIIIII C°41 II!!I !111111 Wiil 1 €III! !!!hill! MII 11!111 11111lj1111111 11!!ij 111M11111111 !!!91111 1111il91Il1111 1111!! al11111""it IIIIiII I1]ljlllllll tlllllli 111I1lllillt. 111111!! ltlillilliIi 11111!1! 111ii1111lI�Il11 #ill num !1!!!1!1!1 11lt1111 11111!1 tiiumi ! :1111111' -Jas 017�.T J1 as Northbound Ramp 11111111111111111111111111111 28"4 24414> 24" 28"4 IME ND ND 24" 4— a., 545' DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED BY: BTA DATE: JANUARY 10, 1996 JOB NUMBER: 293037,04 SHEET OF © MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 19S5 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED tWrti trti kw% tom 1,1114 FIGURE 10A eumwerreenamanineesaemnamemoiverenpaileatmorenvortaannumumairawkst EXISTING PROGRESSION MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED CM' • Structural 6 Transportation W390 5, W. Bancroft Street I P.O. 8ox 6903g Portland, Oregon 97201 —0039 P:ione: (503)224-9560 6 FAX: (503)228-1285 SCALE 1' -40 sec ! 1 ¢ t Ctim f 11I1 ' ; titititl1 i'�� f it, 11111 ttitllltiil!!It tut llttltllillltllt tltit tliititiltttitti! ttti tlltitttliti{it11 111t tttfillllitli i, iIIII tlltUlltttlt}ft lif tltiilliiiiniltll 11II lt;Ittittllllittti tut f{ liliffilititlitj iti fillttifilltititll, tti ttitlllfitlittlftif iltfifitif tllittitilll III iltWIc?oliillittl !! atilt =littiiif! u ititttf'Alilt!lltti it tlllitt Hum! It t1tillit ittltiltlll itilllil�y . in t_ ittttll 1111111; IIttt�1i hhllillti 111111 111111!!1111!!1 llltlll1llfilllllllfll itilffill1llfUtillil1 fltitttiiitilflfi111Ji� �illittiltttilltititltf 1lEttlt11t1iltititt Ifiifft1titiltli1 lttiitlti[) liii 113 tfiiftt' cr but EtltlitElr� „�itltitt.i : Eillilt mini Ilili ittit! ttillttitllitil fiftflt}ilitllflltillt iIffttt11tt111f11111111 Iltllliti} }11111 {Ittt'1 Itittillifttlltitttt{tI iflttitlltfititfittlt1 I!itft111tifiltllititf itlliti}}tittliltillii Ituttlilttli!!lt'Itl itiffttllliltllllltli liltitiil111 }1lttflif iitliittiifiti1111111 itlifltl�I111111Ht1ti Illtitt11fi111litiill iitllitft[ttliliilfii lilltitiiltlill;fitit ftiiftlilltififlltlfi tittittittitiitititit' ittnitilltililittiif lillflllttllllitlillt IIIIihi111}fittiflfl ilfittilltilttlittili ' • '4 \ . t (.t • ••• -.4. Northbound Ramp 11111111111111111 2814 24? 28"4 560' IME JND ND DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED BY: STA DATE: JANUARY 10, 1996 JOB NUMBER; 293037.04 SHEET OF © MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED amp uytivimmuntsaiwo PIO UJWIO ma Was • f' 24'4E4> 241 FIGURE 10B ionrammtememeaumionemitititstmatonemisexammisurneanammassiinumravimmutat PROPOSED PHOGI9ESSION AM PEAK WITH 72ND AVE PHASING ADJUSTMENT MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Structural • Transportation 0690 S. W. Samoraft Street � P.O. tax 69039 Portland, Oregon 97201-0035 Pnone: (503)224-9560 • FAX: (503)228-1285 ; •• -ft' 2 Stallanifterlit. 90" 19" SCALE 1"=80' •■• i . • !•• • • . Northbound Ramp 1 1111111111111111111111111111111111 • TIME EEO OUND FUND 28"A> 241* IJ 4-- 28"4 .••••••••••••••••L•••••••••••.••••••••••••••••••••••••• 543' 111111•111111=M0111112•ENNIMIIMIIIIN2MIMMEN110111111111rellIMMINEIRIS DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED BY: BTA DATE: JANUARY 10, 1996 JOB NUMBER: 293037.04 SHEET OF © MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED astaretwomismaimi a* moo ton *et , • • • I 24" --t> FIGURE 10C nersamemusaarwtenonsomuntimmossalmotetwir PROPOSED PROGRESSION PM PEAK WITH 72ND AVE PHASING ADJUSTMENT MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Civil s, dctural Transportation 0690 S W Bancroft Street • P.O. Box 69039 Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 Phone: (503)224-9560 PAX: (503)228-1285 COMHNED TRAFFIC VdLUMES EXISTING GEOMETRY AND PHASING t HCM: SIGNALIZED INTg' ECTION SUMMARY Version 01-11-1996 Center 'tor Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W) Boones Ferry Rd (N-S) 72nd Ave. Analyst: KNK File Name: CAMC.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-11-96 AM PEAK Comment: COMBINED TRAFFIC - EXISTING GEOMETRY No. Lanes Volumes Lane Width RTOR Vols Lost. Time Eastbound L T R >2 < 16 224 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 We L T 2 1 1 488 250 763 12.0 12.0 12.0 229 3.00 3.00 3.00 Northbound L T R >1 1 2 117 436 12.0 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Southbound L T R 1 1 < 243 44 9 12.0 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Pods Peds * WB Let * SB Left * Thyu * Thru * Right * Right * Peds * Peds * NB Right * EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 34.0A 13.0A Green 17.0A Yellow/AR 4.0 4,0 Yellow/AR 4.0 Cycle Length: 76 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS EB LTR 689 3739 0.409 0.184 17.9 C 17.9 C WB L 1630 3539 0.339 0.461 8.5 B 10.6 8 T 858 1868 0.321 0.461 8.4 8 R 729 1583 0.804 0.461 13.7 B NB LT 424 1789 0.309 0.237 15.6 C 5.4 B R 1123 1524 0.427 0.737 2.6 A SB L 256 1083 1.041 0.237 74.8 F 64.1 F TR 422 1780 0.138 0.287 14.8 B Intersection Delay = 16.8 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C Lost Time/Cycle, L . 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0,785 1• • •■■ HCM: SIGNALIZED INTO CTION SUMMARY Version Center For Microcomputers In Transportation • 01-11-1996 Streets: (E-W) Boones Ferry Rd (N-S) 72nd Ave. Analyst: KNK File Name: CPMC.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-11-96 PM PEAK Comment: COMBINED TRAFFIC - EXISTING GEOMETRY No. Lanes Volum,?.s Lane Width RTOR Vols Lost Time Eastbound L T R >2 < 29 488 12.0 2 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Westbound L T R 2 1 1 434 295 346 12.0 12.0 12.0 70 3.00 3.00 3.00 Northbound L T R > 1 1 4 82 536 12..0 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Southbound L T R 1 1 < 421 168 75 12.0 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right SB Right Green 34.0A 13.0A Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 * 5 NB Left Thru Right Peds * SB Left Thru Right Peds EB Right WB Right Green 17.0A Yellow/AR 4.0 Cycle Length: 76 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 6 7 8 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay EB LTR WB L T p. NB LT R SB L TR Approach: LOS Delay LOS 4.11, ■••• 691 3752 0.857 0.184 26.7 D 26.7 0 1614 3505 0.301 0.461 8.3 B 8.6 B 850 1845 0.378 0,461 8.7 B 722 1568 0.415 0.461 9.0 B 425 1794 0.219 0.237 15.1 C 4.7 A 1155 1568 0.505 0.737 3.0 A 307 1295 1.493 0.237 * * * 413 1742 0.642 0.237 19.2 C Intersection Delay = * (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = * (g/C)*(V/c) is greater than one. Calculation of Di is infeasable. • • -------- 1 I HCM: SIGNALIZED INTk 3CTION SUMMARY Version c 01-11-1996 Center 1.or Microcomputers In Transpurtation Streets: (E-W) BOONES FERRY RD (N-S) 1-5 SB RAMP Analyst: KNK File Name: DAMC.HC9 Area Type; Other 1-11-96 AM PEAK Comment: COMBINED TRAFFIC-EXISTING GEOMETRY. No. Lanes Volumes Lane Width RTOR Vols Lost Time Eastbound L T R *..■••■00O 2 1 617 259 12.3 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 We L T R 2 2 440 1018 13.3 12.3 3.00 3,00 111 Northbound L T R Southbound L T R 1 >1 1 417 1 440 12.3 12.3 13.3 130 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds * Peds WB Left * SB Let * Thru * * Thru * Right Right * Peds * * Peds * NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 20.OA 24.0A Green 20.OA Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 Cycle Length: 76 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS EB T 1202 3655 0.592 0.329 14.3 8 14.4 B R 506 1538 0.563 0.329 14.7 B WB L 1010 3657 0.494 0.276 15.2 C 7.8 B T 2402 3726 0.489 0.645 4.7 A SB L 489 1770 0.468 0.276 15.3 C 17.8 C LT 490 1775 0,469 0.276 15.3 C R 452 1636 0.754 0.276 21.1 C Intersection Delay = 12.0 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.612 .... ---------- .................... - _ ---- ......................- ----- . --- ..... ------ _ • ai • ; HCM: SIGNALIZED INT' ECTION SUMMARY Version ' 01-11-1996 Center 'jr Microcomputers In Tran4-ztation Streets: (E-W) BOONES FERRY RD (N-S) 1-5 RAMP Analyst: KNK File Name: DPMC.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-11-96 PM PEAK Comment: COMBINED TRAFFIC - EXISTING GEOMETRY No. Lanes Volumes Lane Width RTOR Vols Lost Time Eastbound L T R 2 1 1017 369 12.3 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 Westbound L T R 2 2 549 630 13.3 12.3 3.00 3.00 111 Northbound L T R Southbound L T R 1 >1 1 745 10 377 12.3 12.3 13.3 110 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds * Peds WE Left * SB Left * Thru * * Thru * Right Right * Peds * * Peds * NE Right EB Right SE Right WE Right Green 20.0P 24.0P Green 20.0P Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 Cycle Length: 76 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: r4vmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS EB T 1250 3800 0.900 0.329 25.0 C 24.0 C R 526 1599 0.738 0.329 20.9 C W8 L 1020 3693 0.583 0.276 18.7 C 11.0 B T 2426 3763 0.287 0.645 4.5 A SB L 494 1787 0.810 0.276 26.3 D 24.4 C LT 496 1794 0.797 0,276 25.5 D R 456 1652 0.616 0.276 20.0 C Intersection Delay = 19.8 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.772 \. . $ • „ • ' . • HCM: SIGNALIZED INTEr 7CTION SUMMARY Version 2 Center i Microcomputers In Transtation = = $ 01-11-1996 Streets: (E-W) BOONES FERRY RD (N-S) 1-5 NB RAMP Analyst: KNK File Name: EAMC.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-11-96 AM PEAK Comment: COMBINED TRAFFIC-EXISTING GEOMETRY. No. Lanes Volumes Lane Width RTOR Vois Lost Time Eastbound L T R 1 2 244 790 12.0 12.3 3.00 3.00 0 Westbound L T R Northbound L T R 2 >1 1 885 575 1 559 12.3 12.0 12.0 0 200 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Southbound L T R Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left * Thru * * Thru * Right Right * Peds * Peds * WB Left SB Left Thru * Thru Right Right Peds * * Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 24.0A 20.OA Green 20.OA Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 Cycle Length: 76 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #2 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS EB L 571 1736 0.497 0.329 13.8 B 6.4 B T 2379 3690 0,406 0.645 4.3 A W13 T 1030 3726 1.049 0.276 53.1 8 53.1 E NB LT 490 1774 1.367 0.276 * * * * R 437 1583 0.953 0.276 40.4 E Intersection Delay = * (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = * (g/C)*(V/c) is greater than one. Calculation of D1 is infeasable. 1.1 A , • , • HCM: SIGNALIZED INTO CTION SUMMARY Version 01-11-1996 Center ,r Microcomputers In Transi,-.,:tation Streets: (E-W) BOONES FERRY RD (N-S) 1-5 NB RAMP Analyst: KNK File Name: EPMC.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-11-96 PM PEAK Comment: COMBINED TRAFFIC-EXISTING GEOMETRY. Eastbound L T R No. Lanes 1 2 Volumes 429 1333 Lane Width 12.0 12.3 RTOR Vols Lost Time 3.00 3.00 0 Westbound Northbound L T R L T R 2 >1 1 860 318 1 514 12.3 12.0 12,0 200 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Southbound L T R Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right SB Right Green 24,0A 20.0A Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 5 6 7 8 NB Left Thru Right Peds SB Left Thru Right Peds EB Right WB Right Green 20.0A Yellow/AR 4.0 Cycle Length: 76 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #2 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS EB L 571 1736 0.807 0.329 20.9 C 9.2 B T 2379 3690 0.633 0.645 5.6 B WB T 1030 3726 0.943 0.276 29.2 D 29.2 D NB LT 495 1792 0.693 0.276 18.8 C 20.2 C R 442 1599 0.765 0.276 21.7 C Intersection Delay . 16.6 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C Lost Time/Cycle, L 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.837 • , 0 COMBINED TRAFFIC VOLUMES PROPOSED GEOMETRY AND PHASING V • •t5 • „ • •• v./ HCM: SIGNALIZED INT ECTION SUMMARY Version 7 ' Center L,Jr Micro:omputers In Transii-rtation 01-11-1996 Streets: (E-W) Boones Ferry Rd (N-S) 72nd Ave. Analyst: KNK File Name: CAMNU.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-10-96 AM PEAK Comment: COMBINED TRAFFIC-PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. No, Lanes Volumes Lane Width RTOR Vols Lost Time Eastbound L T R >2 < 16 224 12.0 5 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Westbound L T R 2 1 1 488 250 763 12.0 12.0 12.0 200 3.00 3.00 3.00 Northbound L T R >1 1 2 117 436 12.0 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Southbound L T R 2 1 < 243 44 12.0 12.0 9 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right SB Right Green 11.0A 23.0A Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 NB Left Thru Right Peds SB Left Thru Right Peds EB Right WB Right * Green 13.OA 13.OA Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 5 6 * * Cycle Length: 76 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6 #2 7 8 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Approach: Delay LOS EB LTR 590 3739 0.478 0.158 19.3 C 19.3 C WB L 1118 3539 0.494 0.316 13.9 B 12.5 B T 588 1863 0.467 0.316 13.9 B R 854 1583 0.724 0.539 10.7 B NB LT 330 1791 0.397 0.184 18.1 C 11.8 B R 762 1524 0.629 0.500 10.1 B SB L 639 3471 0.430 0.184 18.0 C 17.8 C TR 328 1780 0.177 0.184 16.9 C Intersection Delay = 13.8 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L . 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.611 •• • 4 , • - HCM: SIGNALIZED INTE' 7JCTION SUMMARY Version 7 01-11-1996 Center r Microcomputers In Trans 4:cation Streets: (E-W) Boones Ferry Rd (N-S) 72nd Av. Analyst: KNK File Name: CPMNU.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-10-96 PM PEAK Comment: COMBINED TRAFFIC-PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. No. Lanes Volumes Lane Width RTOR Vols Lost Time Eastbound L T R >2 < 29 488 2 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Westbound L T R o.a■■•ft. 2 1 1 434 295 346 12.0 12.0 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Northbound L T R ..brm.00.0 >1 1 4 82 536 12,0 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Southbound L T R 2 1 < 421 168 75 12.0 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * N8 Left * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds Peds WB Left * SB Left * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds * * Peds * * NB Right * EB Right SB Right WB Right * Green 13.OA 19,0A Green 13.OA 15.0A Yellow/AR 4,0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 76 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6 #2 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS EB LTR 691 3752 0.857 0.184 26.7 D 26.7 0 W8 L 922 3505 0.527 0.263 15.9 C 14.4 B T 486 1845 0.661 0.263 18.5 C R 763 1568 0.49n 0.487 8.9 B NB LT 388 1841 0.240 0.211 16.2 C 14.9 B R 743 1568 0.785 0.474 14.7 B SB L 639 3471 0.738 0.184 22.0 C 25.0 C TR 321 1742 0.826 0.184 30.3 D Intersection Delay = 19.2 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.810 4' HCM: SIGNALIZED INTEPqECTION SUMMARY Version 2 1 01-11-1996 Center Microcomputers In Trans i‘ tation Streets: (E-W) BOONES FERRY RD (N-S) 1-5 SB RAMP Analyst: KNK File Name: DAMC.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-11-96 AM PEAK Comment: COMBINED TRAFFIC-EXISTING GEOMETRY. 8.• No. Lanes Volumes Lane Width RTOR Vois Lost Time Eastbound L T R 2 1 617 259 12.3 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 Westbound L T R 2 2 440 1018 13.3 12.3 3.00 3.00 111 Northbound L T R Southbound L T R 1 >1 1 417 1 440 12.3 12.3 13.3 130 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 EB Left N3 Left Thru * Thru. Right * Right Peds * Peds WB Left * SB Left * Thru * * Thru * Right Right * Peds * * Peds * NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 20.0A 24,0A Green 20.0A Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 Cycle Length: 76 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 5 6 7 8 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ....." BB T 1202 3655 0.592 0.329 14.3 B 14.4 B R 506 1,538 0.563 0.329 14.7 B WB L 1010 3657 0.494 0.276 15.2 C 7.8 B T 2402 3726 0.485 0.645 4.7 A SB L 489 1770 0.468 0.276 15.3 C 17.8 C LT 490 1775 0.469 0.276 15.3 C R 452 1636 0.754 0.276 21.1 C Intersection Delay = 12.0 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(X) = 0.612 mg, }CM: SIGNALIZED INTV-1ECTION SUMMARY Version F 01-11-1996 Center .r Microcomputers In Trans tation Streets: (E-W) BOONES FERRY RD (N-S) 1-5 RAMP Analyst: KNK File Name: DPMC.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-11-96 PM PEAK Comment: COMBINED TRAFFIC - EXISTING GEOMETRY No. Lanes Volumes Lane Width RTOR Vols Lost Time Eastbound L T R 2 1 1017 369 12.3 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 Westbound L T R 2 2 549 630 13.3 12.3 3.00 3.00 111 Northbound L T R ro..i.o■ Southbound L T R 1 >1 1 745 10 377 12.3 12.3 13.3 110 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 EB Left NB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds * Peds WB Left * SB Left * Thru * * Thru * Right Right * Peds * * Peds * NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 20.0P 24:0P Green 20.0P Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 Cycle Length: 76 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 5 6 7 8 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS EB T 1250 3800 0.900 0.329 25.0 C 24.0 C R 526 1599 0.738 0.329 20.9 C WB L 1020 3693 0.583 0.276 18.7 C 11.0 B T 2426 3763 0.287 0.645 4.5 A SB L 494 1787 0.810 0.276 26.3 D 24.4 C LT 496 1794 0.797 0.276 25.5 D R 456 1652 0.616 0.276 20.0 C Intersection Delay .4 19.8 sec/veh Intersection LOS C Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) -,-. 0.772 ...... ........ .* ....... ..... ..... . ..... ' • , HCM: SIGNALIZED INTFd ECTION SUMMARY Version \ 01-11-1996 Center'Ior Microcomputers In Transt,,Jrtation Streets: (E-W) BOONES FERRY RD (N-S) 1-5 NB RAMP Analyst: KNK File Name: EAMC.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-11-96 AM PEAK Comment: COMBINED TRAFFIC-EXISTING GEOMETRY. No. Lanes Volumes Lane Width RTOR Vols Lost Time Eastbound L T R 1 2 244 790 12.0 12.3 3.00 3.00 Westbound L T R Northbound L T R 2 >1 1 885 575 1 559 12.3 12.0 12.0 0 200 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 Southbound L T R Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left * Thru * * Thru * Right Right * Peds * Peds * WB Left SB Left Thru * Thru Right Right Peds * * Peds NB Right 23 Right 813 Right WB Right Green 24.0A 20.OA Green 20.OA Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 Cycle Length: 76 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #2 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS aty. 4.4 vooi EB L 571 1736 0.497 0.329 13.8 B 6.4 8 T 2379 3690 0.406 0.645 4.3 A WB T 1030 3726 1.049 0.276 53.1 E 53.1 E NB LT 490 1774 1.367 0.276 * * * * R. 437 1583 0.953 0.276 40.4 8 Intersection Delay = * (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = * (g/C)*(V/c) is greater than one. Calculation of Dl is infeasable. HCM: SIGNALIZED INTFi, 'ECTION SUMMARY Version Center‘Lor Microcomputers In Transtiortation 01-11-1996 Streets: (E-W) BOONES FERRY RD (N-S) I-5 NB RAMP Analyst: KNK File Name: EPMC,HC9 Area Type: Other 1-11-96 PM PEAK Comment: COMBINED TRAFFIC-EXISTING GEOMETRY. No. Lanes Volumes Lane Width RTOR Vols Lost Time Eastbound L T R 1 2 429 1333 12.0 12.3 3.00 3.00 0 Phase Combination EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right SB Right Green Yellow/AR Cycle Length: Westbound L T R 2 860 12.3 0 3.00 Northbound L T R >1 1 318 1 514 12.0 12.0 200 3.00 3.00 3.00 Southbound L T R Signal Operations 1 2 3 4 5 6 NB Left * * Thru Right * * Peds SB Left Thru Right Peds EB Right WB Right Green 20.0A Yellow/AR 4.0 combination order: #1 #5 #2 24.0A 20.0A 4.0 4.0 76 secs Phase E8 WB NB Lost Lane Group: Mvmts Cap L T T LT R Intersection Performance Summary Adj Sat v/c g/C Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS 571 1736 0,807 0.329 20.9 C 2379 3690 0.633 0.645 5.6 B 1.030 3726 0.943 0.276 29.2 D 495 1792 0.693 0.276 18.8 C 442 1599 0.765 0.276 21.7 C Intersection Delay a. 16.6 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.837 7 8 Approach: Delay LOS 9.2 29.2 20.2 COMBINED TRAFFIC VOLUMES PROPOSED GEOMETRY AND P A5ING AND NORTHBOUND MP IMPROVEMENTS •. • HCM: SIGNALIZED INT7 "ECTION SUMMARY Version 01-11-1996 Center.Jr Microcomputers In Tran4rtation Streets: (E-W) Boones Ferry Rd (N-S) 72nd Ave. Analyst: KNK File Name: CAMNU.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-10-96 AM PEAK Comment: COMBINED TRAFFIC-PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. No. Lanes Volumes Lane Width RTOR Vols Lost Time Eastbound L T R 2 < 16 224 5 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Westbound L T R 2 1 1 488 250 763 12.0 12.0 12.0 200 3.00 3.00 3.00 Northbound L T R >1 1 2 117 436 12.0 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Southbound L T R **** **** 2 1 < 243 44 9 12.0 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds Peds WB Left * SB Left * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds * * Peds * * NB Right * EB Right SB Right WE Right * Green 11.0A 23.0A Green 13.OA 13.OA Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 76 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6 #2 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ....... ____ ....... ...... EB LTR 590 8739 0.478 0,158 19.3 C 19.3 C WB L 1118 3539 0.494 0.316 13.9 D 12.5 B T 588 1863 0.467 0.316 13.9 B R 854 1583 0.724 0.539 10.7 B NB LT 330 1791 0.397 0.184 18.1 C 11.8 B R 762 1524 0.629 0.500 10.1 B SB L 639 3471 0.430 0.184 18.0 C 17.8 C T. 328 1780 0.177 0.184 16.9 C Intersection Delay = 13.8 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.611 tf'',4ktt4t* 4 HCM: SIGNALIZED INT =ION GUMMARY Version ' 01-11-1996 Center Microcomputers In Trans „rtation Streets: (E-W) Boones Ferry Rd (N-S) 72nd Ave. Analyst: KNK File Name: CPMNU.HC9 Area Type; Other 1-10-96 PM PEAK Comment: COMBINED TRAFFIC-PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. Eastbound L T R Westbound L T R Northbound L T R Southbound L T R No. Lanes Volumes Lane Width RTOR Vols Lost Time 2 < 29 488 2 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 2 1 1 434 295 346 12.0 12.0 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 >1 1 4 82 536 12.0 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 2 1 < 421 168 75 12.0 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 EB Left * NB Left * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds Peds WB Left * SB Left * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds * Peds * NB Right * EB Right SB Right WB Right * Green 13.0A 19.0A Green 13.0A 15.0A Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 76 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6 #2 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS EB LTR 691 3752 0.857 0.184 26.7 D 26.7 D WB L 922 3505 0.527 0.263 15.9 C 14.4 B T 486 1845 0.661 0.263 18.5 C R 763 1568 0.493 0.487 8.9 B NB LT 388 1841 0.240 0.211 16.2 C 14.9 R 743 1568 0.785 0.474 14.7 B SB L 639 3471 0.738 0.184 22.0 C 25.0 C TR 321 1.742 0.826 0.184 30.3 D Intersection Delay = 19.2 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.810 , • : • . . • I. • r HCM: SIGNALIZED INTrlECTION SUMMARY Version ," 4 01-11-1996 Center ir Microcomputers In Tran rtation Streets: (E-W) BOONES FERRY RD (N-S) 1-5 SB RAMP Analyst: KNK File Name: DAMC.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-11-96 AM PEAK Comment: COMBINED TRAFFIC-EXISTING GEOMETRY. No. Lanes Volumes Lane Width RTOR Vols Lost Time Eastbound L T R - - 2 617 259 12.3 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 Westbound L T R 2 2 440 1018 13.3 12.3 111 3.00 3.00 Northbound L T R Southbound L T R 1 >1 1 417 1 440 12.3 12.3 13.3 130 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds * Peds WB Left * SE Left * Thru * * Thru * Right Right * Peds * * Peds * NE Right EB Right SE Right WB Right Green 20.OA 24.0A Green 20.OA Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 Cycle Length: 76 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS , i EB T 1202 3655 0.592 0.329 14.3 B 14.4 B R 506 1538 0.563 0.329 14.7 B WE L 1010 3657 0.494 0.276 15.2 C 7.8 B T 2402 3726 0.489 0.645 4.7 A SE L 489 1770 0.468 0.276 15.3 C 17.8 C LT 490 1775 0,469 0.276 15.3 C R 452 1636 0,754 0.276 21.1 C Intersection Delay = 12.0 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) --,, 0.612 4 • • • • 1 • .:.• ..•.• HCM: SIGNALIZED INTE 'ECTION SUMMARY Version, 1 01-11-1996 Centerr Microcomputers In Tran4..wrtation Streets: (E-W) BOONES FERRY RD (N-S) 1-5 RAMP Analyst: KNK File Name: DPMC.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-11-96 PM PEAK Comment: COMBINED TRAFFIC - EXISTING GEOMETRY Eastbound L T R No. Lanes Volumes Lane Width RTOR Vols Lost Time 2 1 1017 369 12.3 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 We L T R 2 2 549 630 13.3 12.3 111 3.00 3.00 Northbound Southbound L T R L T R 1 >1 1 745 10 377 12.3 12.3 13.3 110 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds * Peds WB Left * SB Left * Thru * * Thru * Right Right * Peds * * Peds * NB Right }B Right SB Right WB Right Green 20.OP 24.0P Green 20.OP Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 Cycle Length! 76 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS •o• •••• •••I •••• ot• o•i• 4.. a. E8 T 1250 3800 0.900 0.329 25.0 C 24.0 C R 526 1599 0.738 0,329 20.9 C WB L 1020 3693 0.583 0.276 18.7 C 11,0 B T 2426 3763 0.287 0.645 4.5 A 813 L 494 1787 0.810 0.276 26,3 n 24.4 C LT 496 1794 0.797 0.276 25.5 D P. 456 1652 0.616 0.276 20.0 C Intersection Delay = 19.8 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C Lost Time/Cycle, L . 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.772 • •• HCM: SIGNALIZED INTF-;ECTION SUMMARY Version 4 01-11-1996 Center Jr Microcomputers In Transi,rtation Streets: (E-W) BOONES FERRY RD (N-S) 1-5 NB RAMP Analyst: KNK File Name: EAMC2.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-11-96 AM PEAK Comment: COMBINED TRAFFIC-WITH NB RAMP IMPROVEMENT. No. Lanes Volumes Lane Width RTOR Vols Lost Time Eastbound L T R 1 2 244 790 12.0 12.3 3.00 3.00 0 Westbound L T R 2 885 12.3 3.00 Northbound. L T R .11 1 >1 1 575 1 559 12.0 12.0 12.0 0 250 3.00 3.00 3.00 Southbound L T R Phase Combination 1 2 EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right SB Right Green 21.0A 23.0A Yellow/AR. 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 76 secs Phase Signal Operations 3 4 NB Left Thru Right * * Peds SB Left Thru Right Peds EB Right WB Right Green 20.0A Yellow/AR 4.0 combination order: #1 #2 #5 5 * * * * 6 7 EB WB NB Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS L T T :L LT r. 503 1736 0.565 2379 3690 0.406 1177 3726 0.918 489 1770 0.683 0.289 15.9 C 0.645 4.3 A 0.316 24.4 C 0.276 18.5 C Approach: Delay LOS 6.9 24.4 20.7 490 1774 0.685 0.276 18.6 C 437 1583 0.821 0.276 24.8 C Intersection Delay = 16.8 sec/veh Intersection LOS C Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) . 0.772 • a' 4 3 3„ • HCM: SIGNALIZED IN1T 'ECTION SUMMARY Version 1 01-11-1996 Center.. .Jr Microcomputers In Tran4„drtation Streets: (E-W) BOONES FERRY RD (N-S) 1-5 NB RAMP Analyst: KNK File Name: EPMC2.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-11-96 PM PEAK Comment: COMBINED TRAFFIC-WITH NB RAMP IMPROVEMENT. No. Lanes Volumes Lane Width RTOR Vols Lost Time Eastbound L T R 1 2 429 1333 12.0 12.3 3.00 3.00 0 Westbound L T R 2 860 12.3 3.00 Northbound L T R 1 >1 1 318 1 514 12.0 12.0 12.0 0 250 3.00 3.00 3.00 Phase Combination 1 2 EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right SB Right Green 21.0A 23.0A Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Signal Operations 3 4 Southbound L T R 5 6 NB Left. Thru Right Peds SB Left Thru Right Peds EB Right WB Right Green 20,0A Yellow/AR 4.0 Cycle Length: 76 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS EB L T WB T NB L LT 5O3 1736 0.917 2379 3690 0.633 1177 3726 0.825 494 1787 0.346 0.289 32.5 D 0.645 5.6 8 0.316 19.0 C 0.276 14.4 B 7 8 Approach: Delay LOS 11,9 19.0 16.0 495 1792 0.347 0.276 14.4 B 442 1599 0.643 0.276 17.9 C Intersection Delay = 14.6 sec/veh Intersection LOS 8 Lost Time/Cycle, L 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.798 • • • 'CO ,)1,1 ae/i c5/"41' GO,43 24 yekek 763-1-.2:5-46g /5-e/ 7,-47.7446 &° 1 3 5-0 x 6.7 0 33 5- 08LT /5".a/ WETH pew- X 670 ..`• 22 / k 670 / Earimatomienumm......amikaimmeirumr..m.mumsges 7 id . AM, MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED CIVIL STRUCTURAL • TRANSPORTATION 0690 S,W, BANCIROPT STREET • R0. 130X 69039 PORTLAND, OREGON 97201-0039 • (503) 224-9560 • FAX (503) 228-1285 BY OATS ei e. • JOB NO, e',74/". SHT. MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED '41 1995 ALL RIGHt9 RESERVED r .0 • tretbeio . „ . 1AV8 3/8x.I7t4 377 :5-4//- 77W411 /e.c. e e2/6,Koed 34 4 1"79S74$31 /075- /07s- Le.171-X. .8k7 I" kb- svL 1'7.4 dsfainPi S-0 70 Will m-L.ker) irok v e 3' X25- ,V5 (17'4) 0) N j' x25 I oo Pet I MACKENZIE ENGINEERING ENGINEERING INCORPORATED CIVIL c STRUCTURAL 6 TRANSPORTATION 0690 S,W. 13ANCROFT STIRLET 6 FO. 80X 69039 PORTLAND, OREGON 97201-0039 6 (503) 224.0560 � FAX (503) 228-1285 BY !DATE (14. JOEI NO. - MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 105 ALL FlIG1-ITS RESERVED •L AA-1 (2erez/? A71,--eipto AI, LT 4-4-0 9-2s,x I. zi z 4-74 0550/nil L/( a( e. pietk /10 I efl 7LO,.7 -f>coi /M.. n,S! de /4L '11(0 PA4 N/30-z 54g 47L • 10•01....111. • 21 S-K.25%;_- /6z - /50 • • •■■■•••••■••... .11.111•11.M.10 ,r(" 7/7)P MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED CIVIL 6 STF1UCTURAL • TRANSPORTATION 0690 S.W. BANCROFT STREET • P.O, BOX 69039 PORTLAND, OREGON 97201-0039 • (503) 224-0560 • PA) (503) 228-1285 • • BY A //e 96" DATE ' JOB NO, 0,':ie,„5 70-Z WIT. OF MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED w 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED • • • Pm, 6?u,eueltV L-75 ELx.0 E.6 TA/ SIC = 5-7-1 6.76 E-5 RT. 36 7.3 x 8 ZqS-- 74' E:87N JiL A NS- X 1.§. )62c. 25 (47.VN EEci- LLLs-(()(z) /00 (47.4) A.1,501,1/1 s-o% 'Th.? z 1/66 -1-421 x 513 /336 E87-171 14-2Z-1- r. 1, )(1336 /3 86 E8t7. Z77 /1356 36/ E 8TR (\' (S-X I- CA?, 1,100 E60- g7g6.- -;- /93 47 4 r-J5e) - e S MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED CIVIL S STRUCTURAL • TRANSPORTATION 0690 S,W, BANCROFT STREET • P.O. BOX 69039 PORTLAND, OREGON 97201-0039 • (503) 224-9560 • FAX (503) 228-1285 BY ik:1! OATE *1••■•••••Il JOB NO. 8HT. _or MACK8NZIa ENGINMAINCI INCORPORATED 1995 ALL RIGHT 8 RESERVED • , • • 4z) -7L E5 7H .73(8160 ; EgT .217-C8V) 2l 22. 697.19 9- acX/s- (4?' 4).) 36 9-- XI'65 X2S = 154 7:: (7 (4-7-. 2-0 L.-04er J2 174 ci [1:121 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • TRANSPORTATION 0690 S.W. SANCIROPT sTnEET * P.O. BOX 69030 PORTLAND, OREGON 97201-0030 • (503) 224-9560 • PAX (503) 228-1285 BY OATE JOB NO. '103:-7dire SHT. OF_ MACKENZIF. ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 1895 ALL MONIS RESERVED r • c(e. ;;) Anct.,/d6/: /4110 GV8LT":: S1. (/) ) (1.5 )(z5) /44 a:. (5 (+7 (i) frqp-T 5 le 0%5) / • r 4 hi Up Q S-) 157 S-0 t4 145LT 06 c (02 (is )62s) 135 z ii\i8RT" 233 ci.$) (1_ 0-'74) --z-- -- / a N5TH 1 C (,-)(?s.) (44.4) / :20 _. 1:31' DATE MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED JOB NO. CIVIL 4 STRUCTURAL • TRANSPORTATION SFr. OR „* 0690 S.W. BANCROFT STREET • RO, BOX 69039 PORTLAND, OREGON 97201-0039 • (503) 224-9560 • FAX (503) 228-1285 MACKENZI5 5NGINEERING INCORPOHATED .19IJ5 Alt RIGHTS FIEStAVM .••••.•••••■•/•••••■••••••••••••••a / • • 1. MACKENZIE /SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.C. ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • INTERIOR DESIGN 0690 SW BANCROFT STREET • P.O. BOX 69039 PORTLAND, OREGON 97201 -0039 • (503) 224 -9570 • FAX (503) 228 -1285 December 27, 1995 City of Tigard Attention: Randy Wooley, City Engineer 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 -8199 Re: Bingham Site Development Traffic Mitigation Proposal MEI Project Number 293037,04 Dear Randy: The following information is provided in response to our recent conversation regarding our traffic impact study for the proposed Bingham site development on the east side of 72nd Avenue between Lower Boones Ferry Road and Durham Road. As you know, our analysis indicates that the intersection of Lower Boones Ferry Road with 72nd Avenue is continuing to experience queuing and capacity problems related to the signal phasing, coordination with the interchange signals, and intersection spacing. The purpose of this letter is to summarize our findings and recommendations so that a consensus can be reached among the affected jurisdictions with respect to improvements to this intersection related to the proposed site development. Our 1993 traffic analysis assumed a 68,240 sq. ft. grocery store. The current proposed site development includes three retail tenants totaling approximately 75,000 sq, ft. of floor area, but with a lower traffic generation rate and different peak hour volumr due to the different character of the businesses, In addition, there have been other changes in the area, such as the relocation of Costco, which affect the 72nd Avenue / Boones Ferry Road intersection, Consequently, the recommendations contained in our current report are able to achieve the intent of the 1993 recommendations without the disruption to the pedestrian system that had been previously expected. The most constrained turning movement through the intersection is southbound left turns from 72nd Avenue towards the interchange. These vehicles must first yield to oncoming northbound traffic, then stop at a red light at the southbound off ramp intersection. The signal phasing is such that the short distance between the two intersections is usually filled with queued vehicles when southbound left turns are allowed. This requires that traffic either block the intersection or not make the turning movement. The former will reduce the capacity of westbound left turns which are next in the phasing sequence, while the latter will cause long queues and delays on the north 72nd Avenue approach, and may cause some traffic to redistribute to the Bridgeport Road approach. Capacity calculations indicate that the intersection would operate at an acceptable level of service with sufficient capacity if not for the problems mentioned above. Changing lane configurations and the signal phasing and tinting at Booties Ferry and 72nd Avenue can improve the intersection operation. The phasing change would provide southbound left turns with a protected movement and ensure that adequate queuing is available at the southbound off ramp intersection, 1:\ PDATA \S.12103031O4427t,1.OK Randy Wooley Project Number 293037,04 December 27, 1995 Page 2 The table below summarizes the capacity and level of service for the existing, base, and combined traffic volumes with existing phasing and timing, and for combined volumes with the recommended improvements, Base traffic volumes include existing volumes plus one year of growth at 3.5% and traffic from in- process developments. The in- process developments are the Leagjeld Business Park on Upper Boones Ferry Road and the Pacific Business Center at 72nd Avenue and Durham Road, across from the Bingham site, Combined traffic volumes include Base volumes plus site traffic. The traffic volumes sheets are attached. Lower Boones Ferry at 72nd Avenue Intersection Capacity and Level of Service Scenario Time Period V/C Delay LOS Existing Volumes AM 0.63 11,0 B PM 0.55 11,9 B Base Volumes AM ---° 0,74 - ------ 13,4 B PM 0,67 >60 F Combined Volumes AM 0,79 16.8 C PM 0,80 >60 F Combined Volumes w/improvements AM 0,61 15.6 C PM 0,81 19.2 � The level of service "F" reported for base and combined PM peak hour operation is due to the existing timing. Simply altering the timing can improve the average delay, but may disrupt the progression between intersections, and, hence, is not recommended without changes to the existing lane configuration and phasing. Figures presenting existing and proposed lane configurations and signal progression, as well as capacity calculations, are attached for your reference. The intersection of Lower Booties Ferry Road with 72nd Avenue will operate more efficiently with the recommended improvements by decreasing delay, increasing capacity during the AM peak hour, reducing the number of vehicles blocking the intersection, and eliminating conflicts between northbound and southbound vehicles, #AWPbATAVS•11t903' ,O4u iU,Sii Randy Wooley Project Number 293037,04 December 27, 1995 Page 3 Wc recommend the following changes: 1. 41ter the sigr...i phasing to provide separate phases for nr, xthbound and southbound vehicles, 2. Restripe the north approach to pic ide two left turn lanes and a shared through/right lane. 3. Restrip- the west approach to provide two through lanes. 4. Change the signal timing to accommodate the additional phase and fit the existing progression plan with the interchange ramps as shown in the attached progression diagram, These measures will improve the operation of the intersection consistent with the intent of Condition 5 of Tigard approval for SDR 93 -0017, a copy of which is attached for your referee' e. It should be noted that this condition was worded in response to the recommendations precipitated by traffic circumstances present at that time, while providing sufficient flexibility to account for changes such as those we have now recognized. The recommended improvements noted above will achieve a commensurate level of traffic improvement, while also maintaining the existing pedestrian access bets '« the Park and Ride lots via the crosswalk on the east side of SW 72nd Avenue, which was a major concern of Tri -Met. We will copy this letter to affected jurisdictions and request their comments during the week of January 2, 1996, so that a final consensus can be reached and the project can proceed expeditiously. Sincerely, Lans Stout David G. Larson, P.E. Vice President, MEl LS /sk Attachments c: Stuart Bingham - Bingham Construction Steve Neville - New & Neville Toni Tushner / Tom Wolch - Washington County Dept. of Land Use and Transportation Marty Jenavold w ODOT Milwaukie Kim Knox - Tri -Met F AVIDA9 A193- 12W3037.041271,1. 4 EGEW; . r'1 o r, Raticetrzie15.atta `;i A;p :- �' MaMkenzie Engineering ring inn rporat vac- TIC; NOTic Or rEc: DEVELOPIIZT n rt BINGEAM INVEST2 NTS Past -It" brand x transmittal memo f Ca. 41 at pipits 1. iLnlAakiL • 1116 NO. P9ttin+e a 14171 hal5 52 : A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a, stew' 68,240 square foot grocery stoma. Zoning: C— (General Commercial) Locations 16700 SW 72Nd Avenue 0;47= 251 13AD, tax lot 1700) S T .. w'Ow 2„t ? : Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above r€e test subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on Which the decision is based are toted La Section II. T23 FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SMALL BE SATISFIED OR VINANctALLY MITRED PRIOR To TEE X55MNCE or BUILDING PERMITS. ASS OTHERWISE NOTED, TEE STA's.°'' CONTACT SEA= BE 111,....tjamx, 0:' TEE ENGINEERING "PART NT . 3. Right-of-way shall be dedicated to the public along the frontage of the p:opoved S.W. 72nd Avenue right -of -way to increase the total of the dedicated and proposed right- cf-way to a minimum t of 30 Beet From the centerline. The description shall be tied to the ceast9r11na of t'ara existing right-of-way of 5,W. 72nd Avenue. r• 24 Standard street improve e is , including concrete sidewalk, d:: iveway apron, and street lighting shall be installed along the S.W. 72Nd Avenue frontage. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to major collector street standards and shall conform to the alignment of existing a,d j ac nt improvements. vements. 3. They exieting e.: afti: signal installation at the 72:.d/Durhara shall be ,evised to .p owid ,.si ,p4.— controls for.the north the atta. Traffic ,ima?3dngs7 bXa.. z"esz4 projected traffic at the two site entrances. 4. The car. -site driveway system shall be in acdo_danCe with ccincept submitted by MacNenzis Engineering on December 1, 3. intersection driveway from the attached 1993. The intersection of 72,ndf Bridgtsport f tower eaotes Ferry shall ba revised as shown in Pi guwes 7B and BB of the report tithed "Bingham Site Development Traffic Impact Analysis" prepa.ted by HanXenxa a Engineering Incorporated and dated September 17 r 1953. The pedestrian bridge shorn on rigure SE shall no~ be tequ{ :edl however, pedestrian crar'.nectiong shall be constructed between that Tr ,-R t pare- and --ride lots and the crosswalk at the atotthbour.d freeway ramps. This work requir er agp"owal, and p9rmtte from OD OT and Waahingtcar. Cou »ty. Z. requested by °DOT and Washington County, the City Engineer may require alternative improvements approved by Mar and Wattilington County in lieu of oho improvements shown in Yigurea 773 and SE, provided that the alternative tive i.mproveoents are similar in cast and provide similar la traffic operational improvement. I.f re vatted by OD0T and Waahin ton County, the City Engineer may tocel;t payment of a tee in lien of interAecticn improvements. the pedalo z'iata conaectiOns to the park -std. ride lots will teravLeg approval from ^friwtfie►t. If requested by `'ri -i et, tha City ZligiIteliar matt' delete, tbs requirement for the pedestrian connections. NOTICE OP DECISION SDR 93 w 001:7 B/NWMU f LM A ODDS PAGE 1 • n • •u∎ • Lower Boone Ferry Road to Not to Scale DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED BY: BTA DATE: JOB NUMBER: 293037.04 SHEET OF NIACKENZIr ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVEO kniiiwroArnOltscitaLittied Deal itMLiM 1444 FIGURE 1 EXISTING LANE CONFIGURATIONS MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Civil • Structural • 'Transportation 0690 S. W. 0ancroft Street 6 P.O. 0ox 69039 Portland Oregon 97201 -0039 Phone: (503 )224- -9560 + PAX: 003)228-1285 r, Lower Doones Kerry Road t 1160 Not to Scale FIGURE 2 DRAWN BY: 0MB CHECKED BY: BTA DATE: JOB NUMBER: 293037,04 SHEET OF MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 1995 ALL BIGHTS RESERVED togf$NTNArrto.ituctDi.w tid i1+.rtlni i•It Wb PROPOSED LANE CONFIGURATIONS MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED CIVII 6 Structural b Trarteportatlon 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street 6 P.O. Box 69039 Portland, Oregon 97201 -0039 Phone: (503)224.-9560 a PAX: (503)22E3 -1255 • :.p 1. A 14 0, 1 0. C3) :712 to co o � N 12--1 •`.. 610 199 ---.. -4-- 199 472 t 0 N NOT TO SCALE Durham Road DRAWN BY OMB CHECKED BY: BTA DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1995 JOB NUMBER: 293037.02 SHEET Or C) MACKENZIE: ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 195 ALL RICHTS RESERVED 1031 7WVCIVILinntar4.iT41G 110411 W./10+!/97 104V >�d rad FIGURE 3A EXISTING TRAFFIC AM PEAK HOUR MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Civil 6 Structural + Transportation 0690 S. W. 8cncroft Street ' P.O. Sox 69039 Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 Phone; (503)224 -9560 d FAX: (503)228 -1285 V„ NOT TO SCALE 840 --�-� 275-.0„ .+- 545 .k 530 FROURE. 3B DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED BY: BIA DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1995 JOB NUMBER: 293037,02 SHEET OF 1 TE ORptlRA1 E0 995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Vh aa4∎ca'VIV∎a ruaa rvd a iva4MS !off 14.00 EXISTING TRAFFIC PM PEAK HOUR MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED CIviI o Structural # Transportation 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street ' P.O. Box 69039 Portland Oregon 97201 --0039 Phone: (505)224 -9560 • FAX: (503)226 -1 265 40 --4° 235 - d* Cr) I ro to ci ro rn 0 N to co N7 N N 12 738 225-4. .s-- -- 251 5 ` A--- 489 N CO CO 1/ DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED BY: BTA DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1995 JOB NUMBER: 295037.02 SHEET OF C(' MACKEN2IE ENGINEVIINU INCORPURATEb 1555 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED es3ovviNcPiri.'1talre44. o bM i iZ44/95 ion' FIGURE 6A 18ASE 1096 TRAFFIC, AM PEAK HOUR MACKENZIE ENCINC RING INCORPORATED Civil • Structural Trotiaportotton 0590 S. W. 8anoroft Street s P.O. Box 89039 Porlk ncl °regon 97201 -0039 Phone: (503)224 -9580 . rax: (503)228 -1285 NOT TO SCALE Durham Rood 44 265 -•.,� a0 C� h In 00 f 44. ix) ,75 �tM} -M •- M .1``- 266 -F--• 299 or' 441 581 348 - . Ay'` 549 0 c 66 �ttti FIGURE 6B DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED BY: BTA DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1995 JOQ NUMBER: 293037,02 SHEET OF MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED t93037I4141VTLi337T bita DID 0164141 BASE 1996 TRAFFIC PM PEAK HOUR MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Civil • Structural + Tronsportotton 0650 S. W. 9dnoroft Street • P.O 13ox 65039 t'orticnd, Oregon 97201 -0039 Phone: (503)2249560 to FAX: (5033)228 -1285 6 • N u- u.) 3 --- . 238,6, or-- t 0 o (D c M in a, CC) N \,, 3 3 8 4 N NOT TO SCALE Durham Road .. 763 224 --0. .1-- 250 5 `ti. 4 ie- 488 ti U' N r' tri cr rV. 0 0 a ,,4 tl �� 0 \O4tt �0 •006 so FIGURE 9A tti DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED BY: BTA DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1995 JOB NUMBER :293037,02 SHEET OF MACKENZIE ENCINEERINC INCORPoRATCO 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 9303704V:IVil.■07rG9411541 001 WWI /93 iC» OOM INE D TRAFFIC AM PEAK HOUR MACKENZIE LNGINEERING INCORPORATED Civil o Structural a Trdnspirtdticn 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street • P.O. Sox 59039 Portland. Oregon 97201 -0039 Phone: (503)224 -9560 I PAX: (503)228 -1285 • ' • ' • 0 0 rr) C) 0 '— CV 44.A' sp._, 12 10 --i- .0--- 18 276— dr—. 42 CN 4 4— t4.) .44 Le: re) CN Lt) t ••••••••■•■•••■•••••••.....*, u-) C‘4 "zt 29 488 —.- 2 t et el 21 85 *--4 346 40--- 295 de-- 434 tr) • NOT TO SCALE Durham Road tx) 4-- .0- re) f*--. 1017 '4-- 30 369 dr— 549 0 0 0 FIGURE 9B • DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED BY: BTA DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1995 JOB NUMBER: 293037.02 SHEET OF 0 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVE() e93113764\CIVM1)37F(10,11V0 WI 0.104/1d 10411 COMEINED TmArric PM PEAK HOUR IsAACKNZIE I\IGINEERING INCORPORATED Civil � Structural • Transportation 0690 S. W. Eldricraft Stradt • P.O. Elox 69039 Portia ridj Oregon 97201-0039 Phone: 503)224-9560 FAX: (503)228-1285 72nd Ave Southbound Ramp Northbound Ramp 125' 280' a.� 72nd Ave Southbound Ramp Northbound Ramp i 72nd Ave Progression with Proposed 72nd Phasing Southbound Ramp Northbound Ramp Z 24' 28'4 24'4 123'' 280' EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES EXISTING GEOMETRY AND PHASING 0 011111111111111111 HCM; SIGNALIZED INTF ECTION SUMMARY Version Center tor Microcomputers In Transportation 12-26-1995 Streets: (E-W) Boones Ferry Rd (N-S) 72nd Ave. Analyst: ETA File Name: CAMEX.HC9 Area Type: Other 12-26-95 AM PEAK Comment: EXISTING TRAFFIC - EXISTING GEOMETRY Eastbound L T R Westbound L T R Northbound L T R Southbound L T R No. Lanes Volumes Lane Width RTOR Vols Lost Time >2 < 12 199 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 2 1 1 472 199 610 12.0 12.0 12.0 183 3.00 3.00 3.00 >1 1 2 104 423 12.0 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 EB Left * NB Left * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds Peds * WB Left * SB Left Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds * Peds * NB Right * EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 34.0A 13,0A Green 17.0A Yellow/AR 440 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 Cycle Length: 76 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 1 1 < 200 38 6 12.0 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group; Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS EB LTR 690 3746 0.358 0.184 17.6 C 17.6 C WB L 1630 3539 0.328 0.461 8.4 B 9.3 B T 858 1863 0.255 0.461 8.1 B R 729 1583 0.643 0.461 10.9 B NE LT 424 1789 0,274 0.237 15.4 C 5.1 B R 1123 1524 0.414 0.737 2.6 A SE L 275 1162 0.799 0.237 28.0 D 25.6 D TR 424 1789 0.116 0.237 14.7 B Intersection Delay = 11.0 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.626 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTE 1CTION SUMMARY Version Center i*or Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W) Boones Ferry Rd Analyst: BTA Area Type: Other Comment: EXISTING TRAFFIC Eastbound L T R 12-26-1995 (N-S) 72nd Ave. File Name: CPMEX,HC9 12-26-95 PM PEAK Westbound L T R Northbound L T R Southbound L T R No. Lanes Volumes Lane Width RTOR Vols Lost Time 2 13 441 2 12.0 0 3.00 3,00 3.00 2 1 1 426 287 233 12.0 12.0 12.0 70 3.00 3.00 3.00 >1 1 4 55 525 12.0 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 BB Left * NB Left * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds * Peds * WB Left * SB Left * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds * Peds * NB Right * EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 34.0A 13,0A Green 17.0A Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 Cycle Length: 76 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 1 1 208 138 59 12.0 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS EB LTR 692 3757 0.751 0.184 22.2 C 22.2 C WB L 1614 3505 0.296 0.461 8.3 B 8.4 B T 850 1845 0.367 0.461 8.7 B R 722 1568 0.245 0.461 8.1 B NB LT 425 1794 0.151 0.237 14.8 B 4.2 A R 1155 1568 0.494 0.737 3.0 A SB L 335 1416 0.674 0.237 20.6 C 19.0 C TR 413 1745 0.518 0.237 17.2 C Intersection Delay = 11.9 sec/veh Intersection LOS . S Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) . 0.546 ■■ .... ..... m■.■■■■■■■■ ..... ■■■■■■■■■■ .. ■ ....... *loft ...... ■■■■■■ ■■ ...... • B ASE TRAFFIC VOLUMES LUMES EXISTING GEOMETRY AND PHASING HCM: SIGNALIZED INTE 7,CTION SUMMARY Version 12-26-1995 Center 11-r Microcomputers In Trans, .2tation Streets: (E-W) Boones Ferry Rd (N-S) 72nd Ave. Analyst: BTA File Name: CAMC.HC9 Area Type: Other 12-26-95 AM PEAK Comment: BASE TRAFFIC - EXISTING GEOMETRY Eastbound T R Westbound Northbound LTRLTR Southbound L T R No. Lanes Volumes Lane Width RTOR Vols Lost Time >2 < 12 225 5 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Phase Combination 1 EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right SB Right Green Yellow/AR Cycle Length: 2 1 1 489 251 738 12.0 12.0 12.0 229 3.00 3.00 3.00 >1 1 2 108 438 12.0 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations 3 4 34.0A 13.0A 4.0 4.0 76 secs Phase Lane Group: Mvmts Cap 1 1 < 228 39 12.0 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 NB Left Thru Right Peds SB Left Thru Right Peds EB Right WB Right Green 17.0A Yellow/AR 4.0 combination order: #1 #2 #5 Intersection Performance Summary Adj Sat v/c Flow Ratio EB LTR 689 WB L 1630 T 858 R 729 NB LT 424 1123 SB L 269 TR 424 3742 3539 1863 1583 1789 1524 1135 1789 g/C Ratio Delay Approach: LOS Delay LOS 0.403 0.184 17.9 C 17.9 0.339 0.461 8.5 B 10.2 0.322 0.461 8.4 B 0.767 0.461 12.8 B 0,286 0.237 15.4 C 5.2 0.428 0.737 2.7 A 0.934 0.237 45.3 E 40.2 0,118 0.237 14.7 B Intersection Delay = 13.4 sec/veh Intersection LOS = Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.736 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTE CTION SUMMARY Version 12-26-1995 Center Lr Microcomputers In Transtation Streets: (E-W) Boones Ferry Rd (N-S) 72nd Ave. Analyst: BTA File Name: CPMB.HC9 Area Type: Other 12-26-95 PM PEAK Comment: BASE TRAFFIC - EXISTING GEOMETRY No. Lanes Volumes Lane Width RTOR Vols Lost Time Eastbound L T R >2 < 13 494 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Westbound L T R 2 1 1 441 299 266 12.0 12.0 12.0 70 3.00 3.00 3.00 Northbound L T R >1 1 4 57 543 12.0 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 EB Left * NB Left * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds * Peds * WB Left * SB Left * Thru * Thru * ±d.ght * Right * Peds * Peds * NB Right * EB Right SB Right WB R3ght Green 34.0A 13.0A Green 17.0A Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 Cycle Length: 76 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 Southbound L T R 1 1 < 337 143 61 12.0 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mymts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS -,..._ ....- BE LTR 692 3758 0.839 0.184 25.7 D 25.7 D WE Ta 1614 3505 0.305 0.461 8.3 B 8.5 B T 850 1845 0.383 0.461 8.7 B R. 722 1568 0.295 0.461 8.3 B NB LT 424 1792 0.156 0.237 14.9 B 4.2 A R 1155 1568 0.511 0.737 3.0 A SB L 333 1408 1.058 0.237 * * TR 413 1745 0.535 0.237 17.4 C Intersection Delay = * (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = * (g/C)*(V/c) is greater than one. Calculation of Dl is infeasable. COMBINED TRAFFIC VOLUMES EXISTING GEOMETRY AND PHASING • HCM: SIGNALIZED ma M E[, 'CTION SUMMARY Version Center 1.,Jr Microcomputers In Transation Streets: (E-W) Boones Ferry Rd (N-S) 72nd Ave. Analyst: ETA File Name: CAMC.HC9 Area Type: Other 12-26-95 AM PEAK Comment: COMBINED TRAFFIC - EXISTING GEOMETRY No. Lanes, Volumes Lane Wirlh RTOR Lost. Time Eastbound L T R >2 16 224 5 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Westbound L T R 2 1 1 488 250 763 12.0 12.0 12.0 229 3.00 3.00 3.00 12-26-1995 Northbound Southbound L R L T R 1 1 1 1 < 2 117 436 243 44 9 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds Peds * WE Left * SE Left * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds * Peds * NB Right * EB Right SE Right WB Right Green 34.0A 13.0A Green 17.0A Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 Cycle Length: 76 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS - EB LTR 689 3739 0.409 0.184 17.9 C 17.9 C WB L 1630 3539 0.339 0.461 8.5 B 10.6 B T 858 1863 0.321 0.461 8.4 8 R 729 1583 0.804 0.461 13.7 B NE LT 424 1789 0.309 0.237 15.6 C 5.4 B R 1123 1524 0.427 0.737 2.6 A SE L 256 1083 1.041 0.237 74.8 F 64.1 V T. 422 1780 0.138 0.237 14.8 B Intersection Delay = 16.8 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9,0 sec Critical v/c(x) t= 0.785 MI... 1. .4 , • ' HCM: SIGNALIZED 'NTS ACTION SUMMARY Version " Center Microcomputers In Transp,,Etation Streets: (E-W) Boones Ferry Rd (N-S) 72nd Ave. Analyst: ETA File Name: CPMC.HC9 Area Type: Other 12-26-95 PM PEAK Comment: COMBINED TRAFFIC - EXISTING GEOMETRY r, No. Lanes Volumes Lane Width RTOR Vole Lost Time 2 1 1 29 488 2 434 295 346 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 0 70 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 >1 1 4 82 536 12.0 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Phase Combination EB Left Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds WE Left Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right Right SB Right WE Right Green 34.0A 13,0A Green 17.0A Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 Cycle Length: 76 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 Intersection Performance Adj Sat v/c g/C Flow Ratio Ratio 'I • Approach: Delay LOS L , ...., 691 3752 0.857 0.184 26.7 D 26.7 0 B L 1614 3505 0.301 0.461 8.3 B 8.6 B T 850 1845 0.378 0.461 R H 722 1568 0.415 0.461 9.0 B B LT 425 1794 0.219 0,237 R 1155 1568 0.505 0.737 3.0 B L 307 1295 1.493 0.237 * TR 413 1742 0.642 0.237 19.2 C Intersection Delay = * (sec/veh) Intersection LOS (g/C)*(V/c) is greater than one. Calculation of D1 is infeasable. • FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUMES REVISED GEOMETRY AND PHASING 1/4 HCM: SIGNALIZED 'NIT: ECTION SUMMARY Version 7 ' 12-05-1995 Centerir Microcomputers In Trans Streets: (E-W) Boones Ferry Rd Analyst: KNK Area Type: Other Comment: COMBINED TRAFFIC (N-S) 72nd Ave. File Name: CAMNTJ.HC9 12-4-95 AM PEAK No. Lanes Volumes Lane Width RTOR Vols Lost Time Eastbound L T R >2 4 16 224 5 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Westbound L T R 2 1 1 488 250 763 12.0 12.0 12.0 200 3.00 3.00 3.00 Northbound L T R 1 1 2 117 436 12.0 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Southbound L T R 2 1 4 243 44 9 12.0 12,0 0 3.00 3,00 3.00 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ES Left * NB Left * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds Peds * WB Left * SB Left * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds * Peds * * NB Right * EB Right SB Right WB Right * Green 13.OA 19.0A Green 13.OA 15.0A Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 76 secs Phase combination order: #2 #1 #5 #6 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ....." EB LTR 689 3739 0.409 0.184 17.9 C 17.9 C WB L 931 3539 0.593 0.263 16.5 C 15.9 C i T 490 1863 0.561 0.263 16.7 C 1 R 771 1583 0.802 0.487 14.9 B NS LT 377 1791 0.347 0.211 16.7 C 12.6 B R 722 1524 0.664 0.474 11.5 B 88 L 639 3471 0.430 0.184 18.0 C 17.8 C TR 328 1780 0.177 0.184 16.9 C Intersection Delay . 1.5.6 sec/veh Intersection LOS . C Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) .' 0.611 . ..-....................__.-_-_ • " • • . HCM: SIGNALIZED INTE :CTION SUMMARY Version ; Center Fur Microcomputers In Transportation 12-05-1995 Streets: (E-W) Boones Ferry Rd Analyst: KNK Area Type: Other Comment: COMBINED TRAFFIC (N-S) 72nd Ave. File Name: CPMNU.HC9 12-5-95 PM PEAK No. Lanes Volumes Lane Width RTOR Vols Lost Time Eastbound T R >2 ‹ 29 488 2 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Westbound L T R 2 1 1 434 295 346 12.0 12.0 12.0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Northbound Southbound L T R 0•41. 1.4 ••• > 1 1 2 1 4 82 536 421 168 75 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 0 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds Peds * WB Left * SB Left * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds * Peds * * NB Right * EB Right SB Right WB Right * Green 13.OA 19.0A Green 13.OA 15.0A Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 76 secs Phase combination order: #2 #1 #5 #6 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS EB LTR 691 3752 0.857 0.184 26.7 D 26.7 D WB L 922 3505 0.527 0.263 15.9 C 14.4 B T 486 1845 0.661 0.263 18.5 C R 763 1568 0.493 0.487 8.9 B NB LT 388 1841 0.240 0.211 16.2 C 14.9 B R 743 1568 0.785 0.474 14.7 B SB L 639 3471 0.738 0.184 2240 C 25.0 C TR 321 1742 0.826 0.184 30.3 D Intersection Delay = 19.2 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.810 io4.6 .......... 4"6..4* ...... ........ ...... LARRY A. BRISKER WILLIAM Ii. STOCKTON BARBARA L. IOHNSTON* GEORGE W. MEAD" fi BRISBEE & STOCKTON Attorneys at Law 139 N.E. LINCOLN STREET P.O. BOX 567 HIL LSI3ORO, OREGON 97123 TELEPHONE (503) 648 -6677 PAX (503) 648 -1091 Of Counsel CARRELL F. BRADLEY Also licensed in Washington fAlso licensed In New York November 21, 1994 Records Custodian City of Tigard 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Hamilton Properties v. Associated Grocers Dear Custodian: Enclosed herein find Subpoena Duces Tecum which requires you to produce copies of certain documents. You will note on the face of the Subpoena that no personal appearance is actually required and that you may fulfill the obligations thereof by forwarding to this office copies of the specified :documents on or before the date indicated therein. Also enclosed is the statutory appearance fee. If you have any questions, please call. eery truly yours, Larry A. Brisbee dm Enclosures cc Robert D. Newell •,*71: , ,,, , •.. ••::\t: 1 , , ',,i'''''''.1 •••:•'-' 1 1 71 I, ,f .,di ,)i 1 - PF t r; tl ' i t ic Y.1 .,,vitrt ....,:..—.,0;,..:. I 1 r s'',":r ",.., ',01 1 ,*, ' •• l'011_i'r i Vi41.1 , 0,,,,,,,,,- ; (.1q ,01,.•''' 4. 3 '''.' ..i t3ir I .s 'ult'l ti. N . . • v:,,rs:;1•- t: tiir t: F$1;.; 5 S S . • 7‘,1.'.■ IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 3T E OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF WAS) .,GTON 15 16 17 18 19 HAMILTON PROPERTIES, INC., an ) Oregon corporation, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ASSOCIATED GROCERS, ) INCORPORATED, a Washington ) corporation, ) Defendant. ) ) Not C 940838CV SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM 21 TO: Records Custodian, C ITY OF TIGARD 13125 S.W. I all, Bou1evard4 Tigard, Orevm 97223 y Rjc12a Brewersdorff,,,L, 22 Senior Planner 23 You are required to appear at Brisbee & Stockton 139 N.E . 24 Lincoln Street Hillsboro_, Oregon 911.23, on the 10th , , day of 25 F uary, 1995, at 1 0:00 A.M. to testify as a witness in the 26 above entitled cause on behalf of Associated Grocers, Page 1 - SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM 3PIS13CE & STOCKTON Attorneys at Law 136 N.C. Lincoln Street, P.O. Sox 561 Hillsboro, Ortg n 97123 Tolephot* (503) 64E3 -6677 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1:1. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Incorporated, the defendant herein, and to remain until the testimony is closed unless you are sooner discharged. You are required to bring with you for inspection and copying: 1. Any and all documents relating in any way whatever to the proposed development of the real property described in the attached Exhibits A and B, which proposed development may also be known as Project 293037, Bingham Development at 72d Ave. and Durham Rd., Meca Foods Development, 72d Ave. and S.W. Bridgeport Rd. Intersection Development, and /or 72d Ave. /Bridgeport /Boones Ferry Road Development; and 2. Any and all documents not already produced pursuant to number 1, above, relating in any way whatever to Notice of Decision SDR 93-0017, attached as Exhibit B. DEFINITION OF DOCUMENT The word "document" is used herein in the broadest possible sense and refers, without limitation, to the originals (or any copies when originals are not available), unless otherwise stated, and any non- identical copies (whether different from the originals because of notes made on such copies or otherwise) of any written, printed, typed, photostatic, photographic, recorded, or otherwise reproduced communication or representation of every kind and description, whether comprised of letters, words, numbers, pictures, sounds, or symbols, or any combination thereof, or inscribed by hand or by mechanical, electronic, magnetic, microfilm, photographic, or other means, as well as phonic (such as tape recordings) or visual reproductions or communications, oral statements, conversations or events, and including but not limited to, correspondence, notes, minutes, records, messages and internal memoranda, diaries, reports, compilations, studies, summaries, analyses, tables and tabulations, financial statements, ledgers, working papers, tallies, maps, diagrams, charts, plans, pictures, computer-stored or computer- readable data, computer printouts, teletype messages and other communications, all other data compilations from which information or communications can be obtained, and any preliminary versions, drafts, or revisions of any of the foregoing. "Document" includes the file and folder tabs associated with each such aforesaid, original and /or copy, all correspondence transmitting /// Page 2 -- SUEPOEWA DUCES TECUM URISREE & STOCKTON Attorneys at Law 166 N.E. Lhicoln Sttoet, P.O. Box 667 Hillsboro, Oregon 97123 Tblephono (503) 648.6677 -A s. • such documents or explaining or commenting on the contents thereof, and all working or supporting papers. WITNESS FEE: $30.00 NOTICE: COMPLIANCE WITH THE ABOVE SUBPOENA MAY BE MADE BY MAILING ALL SUCH DOCUMENTS TO: BRISBEE & STOCKTON 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 By Barbara L. Johnston, OSB #91478 Attorneys for Associated Grocers, Incorporated 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Page 3 — SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM BRISBEB & STOCKTON Attorney's at Law , 139 N.B. Lincoln Street, PO. Box 667 Hillsboro, Otatjon 97.1g3 Telephone (503) 648-6677 EXHIBIT "A" PARCEL 1: A parcel of land lying in Lota 26, 27, 28 and 29, ROSEWOOD ACRE TRACTS, Washington County, Oregon, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Lot 26; thence West along the North line of said Lot 26, a distance of 30 feet to than true point of beginning; thence Southwesterly in a straight line to the South line of said Lot 27 at a point 75 feet West (when measured along the South line of said Lots 26 and 27) of the Southwest corner of that property described in deed to the State of Oregon by and through its State Highway Commission, recorded in Book 195, page 125, Records of Washington County; thence West to the Southwest corner of said Lot 27; thence continuing West along the Southerly line of Lots 28 and 29 to this Southwest corner of Lot 29; thence North along the West line of said Lot 29 to the Northwest corner of said lot; thence East along the North line of Lots 26, 27 28 , and 29, to the point of beginning, EXCEPTING those portions within the limits of public streets and highways PARCEL I1: A parcel of land lying in Lots 32, 33 and 34, ROSEWOOD ACRE TRACTS, Washington County, Oregon, the said parcel being described as follower: Beginning at a point on the North line of said Lot 34, said point being 75 feet Went (when measured along the extension of said North lino) of the Southwest corner of that property described in deed to the State of Oregon, by and through its State H.ighwaay Commission, recorded in Book 195, page 125, Records of Washington County, Oregon p thence Southwesterly in a straight line to the South lines of said Foot 33 at a point 65 feet Went of the Southwest corner of that property described in deed to the State of Oregon by and through its state Highway Commission, recorded in book 344, page 540, said Deed Records; thence Wet along said South line to the Southwest corner of said Lot 33; t,.henc. continuing Neat to the Gouthwest corner of said Lot 33; thence North along the West line of said Lot 32 to the Northwest corner of said lot; thence East along the North line of said Lots 32, 3 3 , and 34 to the point of beginning, EXCEPTING those portions within the limits of public etreete and highways. otarlis III: Lots 30 and 31, ROSEWOOD ACRE TRACTS, Washington County, Oregon, EXCEPTING the following described parcel: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Lot 30; thence South along the West line of said Lota 30 and 31 to the Southwest corner of said Lot 31; thence East along than South line of said Lot 31 a distance of 60 feet; thence Northwesterly in a straight line to the South line of said Lot 30 at a point 40 feet (when measured along said South line of Lot 30) East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 31 a distance of 60 Peet; thence Northwesterly in a straight line to the South line of said Lot 30 at a point 40 feet (when measured along said South line of Lot 30) 'East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 30; thence Northw4aterly in a straight line to the point of beginning. .w, D CXT2' or TIC; boa.kenne! tiRr, ft, Associates, i�OTION of nrc; Mackenzie gngUtirrilg lncorgoreP EIZSG VMORMID M OTHNISTS ---14101701z Putmlim brand tax trdn tni !l ning Tdn Tr& our fair/11# °so. fru_ Unagu tiyY: A request for Site Deveiopeent Review • oval to allow aozistrnctle:n of a few 49.240 equate root grocery 'stone. hots nq: C-4 (General. Commetoiai) ',coati= 16700 sft 72std Avenue (i+'4'"r* :lel 3.3An, tax lot 3,700) e tlotiC�re in hereby given thee the P3.*nzrizag Director for the city a T ss t i.gaiur rROVID the above revisit airbjsat to certain conditional. 2:hae findings and conclusions on which the decision is bared are noted !A Section IZ TIM =zoom Ct0 COZIDI XQNE OW= DX MTI68IRD OR 3'IN* CIALLY SBa 000 PRIOR TO TER XUitJX G16 or 3 0XLsazna} l+'rItta` S. =MS OTl RN/66 t+JGTI D, TEO sTArr7 CONTACT 1ftZL SS fagjaralillSnagg or Ta"$ 61101uw tNO 1381Mlt0C6t1T. 1. Right-of-way (hall be dedicated to the public along the frontage of the proposed *.f. 72nd Avenue right --of -way to increase t. e total of the dedicated *Ad prnpo end, right -of -way to a eairriaacut of 30 feet from the centerline. The description •hall be tied to the centerline of the existing right -of -way of s.tf. 72nd Avsnus. 24 Standard street improvements, including concrete sideu*Lk, dxi :aeway apron, Glad street lighting shall be inets.lbed along the Lit. 72nd Avenue frontage. improvements shall be designed and constructed to major collector. street standards awed shall ccrn.form to the alignment Of existing Adjscant improvemente. 3. The existing traffic signal installation at the 72nd/DUrtuut intersection shall be ise4.4p 2,fride i ,,.� 'Attols for the north drivewa from the sits. Traff1C ,aiarkingtt; on 72d' lbAll bat..:z !'aCxgtt' a.•» -: projected traffic eat the two site entrance*. 4. The catm.nito driveway system shall be in accordance with the attached concept submitted by Maclaurin Zngislalartmg e0 December 1, 1993. The intersection of 7..nd/79ridgepoxt/ er M000es Sorry aall ha tor:1.60d as shown in noires 76 acrd 68 of the report titled "6Lagh r trite Vsreldpment Traffic: Impact Analysis,' proceed by tea cZenrtis 'engineering tncarporaated and dated September 17. 1903. Tba pedestrian bridge Oho** On 2'igure 611 *hall not be required, however, pedestrian connueetioes shall be cosatrtxudtead between the Tri -Mort park. -tnd -'ride( Dots and the cromseweelk at that resathbatd freeway ramps. This work requires approval and peurmit% fxerei a and 44sehldgtcyn County. If requested by COOT and Weslti ngtara county, the City 'engineer may require alternative improvements Approved by 000 ' and Washington COuUty Lxt lieu cif the Improvements 'Move in riot** 75 and 6f, provided that the alternativm impsovemeanos ate similar is coat and provide aeiratiee traffic opearaational, improvement. If r equmatsd by 0DO:C sand WaafhingtOn County, the City taginarat may araweapt payment of as feet in ',Lou et intersection mental. The pedestrian conneotiais to that park.and.iride tat will requLte approval, fraru Tri.Met. If requested by 7`ri- fist. than Cite Ingineer may delete the requitement got the pewit( rian ConnActLone. NoTtcx or DeCISX08 sDa 93 M oa17 hzxotiAHJlaEatiroond pwJ,4 1 N I M V' I Y V M V r N - 4002/(JI1 +n w S. Building perm ,tn will not be £se.teled and con ttuctLon of proposteefd public Depeeeemenee ealutll not commence until aatter the Rngineseeriar Department has reviewed and aeppeoved the public impreremeets plena end at artreeat opening permit or construction compliaece agreeemenet has been executed. A 100 percent performance aaeuratuvo or Metter of commitment, a developer- eugizisr Agrodmant, the paymiet of aa. permit fee and a align i..oetaal.lation/ertreeetlight fee Are required. 7. The propoaad privately operated &rid amintained sanitary sewer wed ,storm dxaialaagee Nyuter planeprofile pia dttsiln shall by provided are part of the public impr'oteoment plane. a. nil applicant shall demonstrate thet storm drainage run..off out overflow from the sits without lignLtS.oantly Impacting prcpertl.caae downstream. dignitary aacewer and storm dXaai tgte details shill be peov►Ldad am pert of they public imp swat planes. Calculations and a topographic map oi! than atom dxaLntg* basiLA and sanitary motor aerate &teea shell be provided ad A a Uppxeement to this ilia improvement plans. CtlaulAtions shall be bayed an !tail a. eeelopm east of the serviceable area. The Ideation and ceeecity of existing, proposed, and future limes shall be addressed. 10. t`ha applLdnn shall provides connection of the proponmad bui.leinq to the public sanitary aewexagae system. .L cannectiort4 perm! t is required to connect to the exieting public easnitaa ry newer ovate*. 1.1. The aappliLcaat shall provide for on -site wAtsr quality treateent 40 ee quixeed by Uni=fied Sewerage Agency Roeolutiorn and Order No. 11 -47. submitted dnaign calculations stall be in conformance with the general requirement* of mins'iittation facillitisae" and the ipncsL>;ic resquirsoutnt, of "ixsi'.i;l.trantioi sumps" of Chapter 2 of AtIrtishuallyafigiluttp.g, r., Ott 12. The applicant shall obtain aaa "Joint Permit" from the City oe-;Cigtrd. This permit ashen meet the a:egui.rsm*nts of $PPati and TtialAtin Basin Erosion Control fr"ogrem. 136 The grading plan shall cOmply with Chapter a 70 of the State of Oregon Structural ral Specialty Code. 14. 7- fired date and le!atdadiapi. g plans shall be subeittud for review by chee /f anni.ng bi7Lnieno tta t content , 21M, . The revised plane shall include the followings a. proviaaion of eight disabled parking spaces, iucltadiug Qtr designated "vas aodeseeibl e" . b. xrroeisioat of 361 uiiL-4l Parking aspaoeat, by providing for 25t wx*psdt spices, ra aigulzng the spaces along the sxst property lice to 90 degree angle pparking or through a reciprocal parking agreement with Tri,H at. Th+a eaelprocel pricking !hall bed Utilized when the hour* of *petition dO not overlap. 0. Landscaping MOW driveway entaratpasa Abell meet vieuel cletreocii st.aedatrds., d. tror!.sion of An .additional 3.2 parking lot to .eea; il, laa,adaeesaped Latitude to be located ed within the interior parking lot area. Trost dtt*t.l be planted in latidedeped islands► and Obeli be equally distribsttsd end on the bashes l azxa`ra or OSCISMf MR 99 « 0017 Rat: t/ttt 90a rain 2 • " .r rtir , 71-`•- aIr5113.054 7781 CiTrUr x _....._ ._w..___.�._...__. CuU371,aZ_...-.. 1 Of one trace for each stolen parking specs's. ft* minimum dimension of the landscape islands shall be three fagot and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. ee Malted crosswalks or 0mpeed hove, to delineate the two pedestrian trimmings connecting to the main eutrance. f. A plan which shows ao p1 iencab with Community Development ment Cie Chapter 1.0. 110, Hiked Solid Wade and Recyclable storage. The applicant tall choose 004 of the following four meths to deaoocatraatee ca pliaassceea Minimum Standard, '4 00 Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling plan oe rranchieaed Mauler Mavis vee and sign-off. g. A tz;;eete replacement plan providing for oane••thiscd at the removed txaa,a or approximately 200 replacement t:reaax. These shall be in addition to whet is shown on the propoetad landscaping plan. To ensure adequate 'short tes;m Screening, A maJorLty aE tha repladement trews shall be of a significant lase. Tree raepleceemasat ahsal,l be cone entrateed along the eastern property lige to further buffer the peoported development from a',ataea:state 5. The view corridors tor signs may be identified -WY tho aappl,ica it to that the plan selected provides the maximum amount of screening while aullowing ,risr.aell acorn to thee wall signs after the trees mature. h. oaretni.ua for service facilities and refuse mental-here. i. rsterior elevation plans ahawing that the building height motte.thit.Oarimum-iswIllIt re nent:. .....,., .. Wheel stops, at l scat: four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking aatati, along the pedestriee doraridor linking the main entrance with the south parking lot. This provi,aaion will encourage the tree fLc4 of pedestrian saova meat: along thin auxxidar. k. 1yzovigioan oia five toot sidewalks along both aaaeaad drives. The sidewalk an the south, ar=ea ®Si ehotld bye located on tha mouth mica of the drive. The paZ iieq""i.stand shall include e, pedestrian refuge end a oroase,Mt.le should be fattened conneeting the MideWalk and pedmetrLan reftage island. The aideeeralle OA the north aaee /aa 'should be de eign ed through the psrasaeer v+ard stand of scuglee 'ire. 1. Provision ,for this In Reed dunseet H eplae eteraaeet trees to be pleated With a eai.tiaart* caliper of two inches' at tout feat in height. m. Covered bL0JCy.e racket. it. feparaati tree rveMoraa,t permits arse required fan: the building area and parking lot. A trine wrotection plat abel/ tray eubleitted and the applicant will install tree protection fencing prior to the /teat of con traction. Tkia 'Anne fae to f'eaanmLA is pleas tht.oughout» ttuae duretioai of consittuOtLion• It •tiattld glee. placed far groat the treeeM 04 is motion], bunt not closer to the tree then one foot behind any neoetemery aesecaveetiao Uit i►. any k%006416414Vje inttrueLent into the protection area =lot be with appreval of the Planning d*ptttatnt. When the cleating WQTxcx QV 0toTSTaN vi - 0017 anothlt/i a&iri oom PADS 3 'r .4 IA. - • - xrrttrr'ua— ;s yr .._lava at7r71"4"-- . • 4irrUr'Pr'"ri' limits are determined and staked,' a tree condition anelyeie azad program Of t hei z e atic carte of the protected treato will. iss required. A revised tree inventory of that parking lot arsa tsheall be submitted. An arborist report end protection plain identifying locations imitable for additional parking lot tree retention nrr_d protection shell also be avb zitted. It ehesutd also identify potential green to he listed as reeplato tree*. xm AVOZT2OX ''I APPLIc u( IRO= Or AMAX 07 TICK! FOLLOW= SXOTIONS OP TEX fAlttrKUli= 1DXVXLOPEBOT 00Ua, T*ce I8 HOT M XXCLUSIV3 LIST. 1. Q&C1'i0E 10.120.040 SWUM AND ASAVEASCX0 A. On All projects where public iMprort nwatet ars icognizaed that Director shells 1. XeqUire a bond in an amount w tt greater than 100 percent of other adequate aissurancees en a. condition of apps ovei of the site development plan in order to ensure the completed project Lay in conformance with the approved plant and 2. AypvoVe and releaa+e such bonds. . a. The bond shall be colecaueed when the Director finds tits completed project conforms to the approved site development plan and all conditions of approval, are satiogLed;. 2. SACTION 16.10.4 arnsa'T AND UTILITY IIPILOVVOMT sTA Dasto A. 10.164.100 !it?ttce to city Required •• .....r.......j... '...,'" :"I 4' "..:a",...*ILT". w.'w M shat) not begin until. the 4 C1.ty has nottfiedrim -' �.,... M.q wMNI.h advance. 2. If 4h s k km diecon time d for any reason, it 411411 not be resumed Until the City is testified. ZTE2S M FE0VA a x8 'VALID x2' EIEACx67ZA WITHIN UOUTXVM ACATUa OF TUX AAT1 or TEM /T.8Qtr MIST= 3c'i�t9 i.. haokrounde This parcel tia® annexed to the , City of Tigard Lim 1976, and Moat toned ViL (Light Industrial) . A Comprehensive 1Pl,sn..Amendment (CPA 90 .40004) and Zone Changes (TON 9400002) wane approved in 1990, oheittgiog the wooing frog x.x (Light In4uatzLrl) to c..4 (general Comm rroial.) . so subsequent land ttse application* have been filed with the city for Chid sits. 2. Vicinity Informations The Nita La betandeed oh the welt by SW 72nd Avenue,. oa they east by Ie0, on the north br the Oregon xuai.rs as pe�rke, and on tey 'moth by a Teri -Rat park a Aide lot. Surrounding bane and toning deeeligtiations Art as industrial perk zoned I -L (Light tddatotrial) to the north, and the formtz 44shingtott County guttry. Which is tenet+d D.p (xnduatrial PIA) ) Lo ter the went. xMuit:riel de>rseAi.apeent La the predominant~ land use as the west did* of the f ee enly Lutaa,rch ngea, wboreasochesercialdevelepeent the predominant use On the east Ni.de. MOT= OF OXC/A aN 6ttdl 93 e 0017 i ttozz pool Wotg Mr 4 t' YY5U3 "ats,t "1Z31r—'�'°"'�"""`--�,, TI'4'°17P"'!'I'a .. ., .� VIUtlBIUIY ...._ !t>t 72nd Avenue 1a 44eignaatt ! as a eel= colleOtor satre s . An ewteutaei,an of Durham itoa;!,d and traffic signal control iwprov'somataa< at thee sW 72nd Avenue /Durham Road inh'eoremotion hoe reaaar tly been oomplet ed. South ot: the proposed site is the OW 72nd Avenuo /i ar^dgaaport Road intsreectioaa. This intersection ism outride this City of Tigard. Xt is within the City of Tualatin boat under the jurimdiacaoa of COOT end Washington L County. Currently, this !Alteration has +substantial operational pr*,b ems. 3. Site tnt;ormetion and rropoeal Descriptions The 6.6 acre undeveloped site is generally flat and is slightly below the grads of the freeway the reby► p vidl.nq substantial snrp tmbtre to freeway traffic. Thorn im e stand of ire Douglass Fir tree on the site along With smaller deaoiduoua tress and low-lying breath. The aapplLcat at request, ap rro, to oonstxuat a now $8, 340 equate foot grocery store, se Ll,luetraated on the attached site playa. Thee pxapood site would £naiw9n 364 parking epitome with five (6) designated handicapped spaces and 24 bicycle masks. 4. other Staff Commut ae s e'o other comments have beetn rnoie ed. S. Agency Comments* Washington county Department of Laud Use and Transportation has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following oomnlreentet Prior to final approval and ivesusAce of a building pa+zaatl.ta 1) Submit plans, obtain ltngi neorina bivieion Approval, and obtain a facility . • pteppit • too. eenaabeuctian of they 4.ciLlputth ,,, pubtic , vents Any, aadditionsar ref t+ evag rt,^r..tepa menta Teamed - -to• be cognized for C 1l.a nde with MO 46.4 ugcri cerdpletion of than •CaUAty Traffic 1luaal et' n review. Theme improvements shall be const~ructsd in acoordance With the reeeiramente of the Washington County Uniform Road Deprovasent Design a:tandaardee 3) Prior to occupancy, the road impro+reeentt, required by condition 1 ',hell be complete and accepted by the County. The City of Tualatin has reviewed this propotal and hoe offered the following It sawn a pzojmat ware approved we woui.d strongly encourage option 4 of the Traffic Xatpeot Ac tlyeiaa which calla for oharaaginq the dtgaial sequuence, restriping for duel.. uru /twee and constructing a p rrdsmtariaen bridge. Tri.Met lids reviewed a wed tht4 proposal send has Offered the following commentr t TrL 4tet is opposed to the removal of the existing pedestrian crossing. tri..& t oftesrs that one pHdastrian ceroaooing option not addreessd is the provision of an added pedestrian siattvate d *iota phtale for that teat orattaiswtik. This phase would allow pedsrttriema to Ocoee Lower eoonee 1 riaad +idle, 72nd lavenua and r pimA: Moud traffic is stepped, and trroul pr.i>Aettrlly► be used only dturing the ?fat peek period. The feasibility of this treatment a the impact on signal. cye . length and other intereoctiau dporstclona +tuned be evaluated triaket will also oaaadider the aaiepl ine.te propraanl; for .100 Waxed patk ,and tip app* in etoaa juotio a with other a rvioi or pedestrian aircelaiet,Lan ohange*. Trio. Mast relquentts that final deOlaaions on the changes to the 72nd Avotltas/ mynas CV batlfdxottr rso* tai 001/ dxt(0ttffkfrxAr000$ PAalfat a4 1 .•• _` ougl...__ �.�_ _.��0� ��� 797 -CrrnP T1 + ..._..__. sa; i,dgepoxt hood intersection be deferred until abetter balanced, multi - tao4ul volution con be achieved. Tri -Mst strongly urges the City of Tigard to proceed with OPOT's chart term recommendation f/. if the City recommends areamaxval, at the pedeoxrian araeowelh, Tri.Met x1 ezueets thet the mega Foods dsVelopment be conditioned to require provision of 1O0 eh..rsd park and ride sprlaers an the developaesast: site. The Oregon Department of Traneportetion b.a reviewed thin prop dal egad ham offered the following c o m m e n t e r )f the city of Tigard chooses to proceed with than prapoe ed signal changes at the 724d hvenue /llxidgeport/t►ooneo Y ry Road it tereection, we recommend eddxasssittg transit /pedestrian need* by doing ana et the fallowing: l.. ratty bath pedestrian cramming* which connect the north and so uth lots and put in azs exclusive pedestrian phase to provides! deextrians with a protected crooning at the 72nd Avenue � bvcn ea Xerrry inter:motion. ODOT shouLd be involved in the development and Implementation of the in cha> Lng to *c nto that it is tat detrimental to the 2. ova the pedestrian crossing at the f2nd Avenue / Scone* tarry intersection, bet make Aeceesa y improvements to the peadeeetria n crossing at the Southbound Ofsf -ramp / Oconee /Terry intersection to provide safe and convenient accoso beets yen tha two perk-as-di-ride lots. This may include the teed to improve the southeast corner of the northern park- and-ride with stairs ad8Mr sear, .•i'a�aa�,al,R,Qaia�x�,.. ....� , .a.,_..,.. . � w Ttaa Tualatin tin V&.i. T'ilag District has reviewed this proposal, and htaa' offered the following to Men t*a 1) Gunta t than Fite PLit:riat' d ?ire Hors i I ° a of f ioaa foe reviews and approval of t tan Location of !S.xra dopey tM nt aannesati ana t 2) No Perking eigmra viral). bee installol where driving su>rfabc:es will not aeccatt# date 20 feet of unobntru ted a #ueftoe. reigns shall state "Rea Parking firs Dane Tow- aWaay Pone ti OM 210.010- 11111 ". ecs.tion of all sign shell be approved by the tire a1ca1's of fi #* 3) Revi,etw and approval, of hydrant locations will be coordinated with Tigard Mater District. t. The Unified OeNenege Ne noy has reviewed this proposal dad had offered this following momenta: A water quality facility and erosion control joint permit Ls necessary. Qete eai Telephone OW 81elat nicla hes taavinwed tiara propoea1 lord, ham aattated the Malawi.ng momenta: The develOper shall be responsible to prow. du and place all candela aztd trot ches aaaoordi g to im specification o. Mime 4540 days from atTe Xngineetinq completion to OTx construction completion. T1lma bbp i rtme tt of Tttv.l.ruadocentel Quality' ' gekYLOWektl this parr )'reseal. and has Offered they following acameae ntnr MOT= Ot DrOZ lxbw mon 03 . 0011 ATMOURN/ t3QMS00as MOM 4 • . -Z/V6/143 i'' }a3 ..Ir NT3-184-723r ........,..... cnm-117 poor /Ox2 ,. Tt ie necees,r;y to have as NP.e 5 - *tors Water Permit for construction faecilitL o over five (8) acres. The City of Tigard Uuil4,inq Division, Tigard Public Workse, 'Tigard Water Ai,aatri,at, Northwest Natural aas, Portland General Ziatric, have reviewed this application and have eaip 'erect no comments or objections. No other comment* have been rec eyed. i.p4! .R7 L- 210did Mi2 1 A. COMPLYAM= WITS COMONITY pN U OVI Oyp COON $N OTION y e ,fi a I The applicant barn! indicated that the proposed building im intended to he used es a grocery store. This ufwo Ls clae,fsaeiflad in Code Section 18.49 (Vme classifications) tab Food and Beverage retail false,. Cod, Section 10.63.090 allows rood and Beverage ;lwtaeai.l *ales as it permitted use In the C-0 mooing district;. Hifi= lot Ark • s Section 16.62.080 4t:4t00 that there is no minimum lot area for parcels La the G-4 aoninq diatriat. The site hat tan average lot width of atppr^oximately 460 foot, thereby m ccsedthq the required 50 foot average minimum lot width. Developments within the C-0 sone are rea1tited to provido n minimum of 15% landecaping for the site. the Applicant bas prepped to devote approximately 49,916 equtre feet (16.5%) for landidaping. glakeqksi section 18.62.950 State* that no 004 or rear yard setback *hall be required temaept where the C-d zone abuts a residential zoning district. This parcel dose not abut a relidentir,l district mead theVefore there era no ep +licabie side or mono yard set bay ka. In addition, there is no front yard estbaok in the C.4 zoning district. • •— •- ..s ssicnuaa bt113.di,st ijaht is 44. -feet. The applicant states that thin hat 'r4gli nmae *nt*..uetiefi d.-howevor neithas.° the applicant eatesft or the submettad Otorior elevation i ndiaateae• tine eat:ust height of the building. A reVided anterior oleev*tiOn plan shall be submitted showing that the bull.ding height satisfies this regUi.rem nt. r i" one-perking `;, A Seation 10.104.040(0)(10) requites a a apace for every 200 square feet of grown floor &red plus One opsoe per every two employees. The Vropoa,ed building is approximately 65 „640 square feet. The required parking for this building is 941 specee. The applicant hest stated that the number of employees is 40. The rsgti red employee parking in 20 spaces. Theurefors, the total numbs of required parking spaces is 96/. the mite plan and applicant ettst ememt indicate that 354 apanee will be provided, asaa"a abort of WAst is require d. A revived bites plan ahaai.l, be submitted which pravi tes for a total of 961 parking apace*. It is recommended that the applicant increase tine number and percentage of compact periking spaces to the 2841 maximum allowed by Coded It is also recommended that the applicant madnragn end elMuzge the parking Stall* to a 90 degree angle along the *aft property Liao, The applicant may also utilise es< reciprocael parking arrangement with zkrkL.. art. The reciprocal parking ehaull be utilised when the retorts of operation do net overlap. ZALAPtarltgagLAtthjzittitiggickcap_thWili which became effective on JanUary 20, 1992, requires eight disabled disibrid-pathing space if 901. to 4013 perking ,aperitifs raids provided. stutter, On.r in every eight aev msnible spaces, bUt not ).areal than one ,, shrill be served by an modems aisle sight feet wide minimum and shell be deotigoeted 'von eaasssilb.ee•. The psttCaited si to plan , shwa th4 praviasioti kratt five disabled padArson parking np0Ceee. A r'9vieed Site plat shell be eullm tted Which indicate, the mofloig or DsCsSIou a tm 53 - ti0ly taxamANAWAttons FAUX 7 1771111/V3-7 tr4-._ . II5U 1a4 rat 141 U0 `iO1 provision of eight disabled perking venue including one designated "van acre edible ". layglae Pakiaur Section 10.100.0200) requires ens bicycle parking rack *pace for each 39 vehicular parking :p rev in any daeeeelapmeeat. Bicycle peeking mares shall not be Located withln peeking ai.eles, landscape areeas, or pedestrian waxes. Teeanty.4Oua: bicycle ptaek9.ctg evacuee will be regeixed ter this dove lepment. The aetppl.ioa ut proposes to inaYti 1l 24 bicycle rack*, thereby aaetl.esfying this treq<alrem eentt. Winn: aeration 10.108.000 requires that commercial uteee wlxi,ah provide more theta 100 perking aepaceeae provide a dingle AC*404 with a atlllis= access width of S0 feet with a minima pavement width of 40 feast or two accouters providing A tninisr2 AOCaUba Width of 30 feet With 24 feat to be) paved. In addition, curbs are requited ea well asr a five toot •idevaalk. The p,ee1ie inxa.ry site plan shows tho pe:orision of two accessed onto zn 72nd ferieersue*. The eeerthern totems. located somas trete SW Durham Mad aextensien, Lee aura to have a 45 at access width which eaarrewe to a 30 foot width heaedLziq south toward the pa:kL q lot. This accee4ei ahead eexvaaa ra ones.waty westbound driveway which exits ante MI 72nd Avenue. No provision of a curb or sidewalk is i.ndiasatted. The southern *cases providers for a 29 foot aide eaCceees width, with no provision of a sidewalk. Than proposed sits ;Van thereby only partially satisfies this regeirement. A revised site plan will be submitted which provides for eldercaae1kse thereby aeatiniying this requirement. The north driveway aide walk could be designed to meander through the preneyrved stand of Douglee rime Mad connect with the other proposed walkway. This dereign would buffet the pedeetri.aa from the traffic,, not regttire the removal of tracer and not infringe Upon the *cease width. In order to provide greaterspeetectiou sad sett Atlfe,ttlP paedeaetrians entering f1 ottgh' thar•� w uth moose, a crosswalk and.yedestrian refuge inland ehauld be provided. A orosausikr whiOtt extends from the sidewalk irate the parking late would offer dome i entifiostiou of leaodaest.tLae Movement but would still leave the pedaeet:rian in the anidit of to busy ingress wed eg ee point. A ramdeaeaigta of the existing parking isle /landscape island to include a pedestriaut refuge area would increase pedestrian eaafeety. /Web out iaeland, in canjia>rtion With aat crosaaws.k, wad vastly improve pedestrian creaming incentive And protection and should thaeeret'oxee be required. 4 fii 2.Se Section 15.l0c08O (,A) requires that s, walkway be ext cosec !draw the ground fleet entrance Of the structure to the street which p>+ovl d e the required isigroa a euid egret*. At pedestrian oros w Lk end walkway hew been provided which connect., the entrance of the building to aW 72nd Avenue through the preoeerlind etend of Douglas a'1ars. This ahritaariae. Lee thereby a9Atiifiasdd. Q,S' a section l0.1034080 requires that ear ty�' commercial use �Jg ag area of 10.000 *quer. feet Or marse shell have at least ore aflestrset leading epee* an mite. In addition, onm optdo shall be peovided lair oaah additional 20.000 wq+r.Ara feet. Th proposed dai,000 a ere foot grodety *tore thereby x.gaLz !oar lea,The ing arpeecsaa be peraavidard. Twee pz'+rOdiaei. indiaettes that feet lotdi tg arpAese Are ptoe►idaeed. ilteeelejreeee seetiaan 18.100.033 estates that all develOpment ptejtots fronting on a public Atteest~ &h all be re ggixed to plant stmt ties LA Maoo: da nde With eabcti*A la4102.035. sections 18.100.035 ri qtt saes that street trees be opened bertrecoa 20 CAA 40 feet &pert d peedierg on the ies0^> TCB or n *casivN sort 93 . 001/ 02:08104/10MMOODS VA4S 8 .6. . r. a. 1.170 '00 V543 044 7207 -_ 1,11115"1, ._ _.___,..._. (411U(JU7U11 14 sista classification of the eras at maturity (mall, medium or large). The preliminary alit* plan indicate the prrc+risLoa of 14 Mid rataazu dt Kayla trees to be spaced 20 feats apart:, thereby sati.stying• this requirement. Yi414 a Section. 16.102 requitals that a clear: vision area acnwl..L be freelaptaluad an the corners of ae/1 property adjacent to irxter a ectinq rri,ght..of -ways or than iata reectLtm of a public street and a private driveway. A altar vision area ihell contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence. ,gall aaet UCt*1 , or temporary or permanent obetrCadotLan exceeding three Vest i n height. The rodeo provides that cbatxwtittowe which may be Located in this etas shell be vi euaetlby slew 1beessaaeeat three swi sight test in height (trees nay be plaaaed wl thi.n this area provided all brra.nahe x below .eight feet ere removed). A ''level clearance aria to the triangular axes forpied by mesa *urtng a 30 foot distance along the Street right-of .,way and the driveway and then aonasoting those two 30 Toot disks points with a straight line. A r ewised landscape plain shall be submitted which shove c ilaeai ce with this requirements ,'°ate.. }Ie_ ;M ___'' a .Lila Section 16.150 aoattaaeifto a>st endaarrds for attaining a permit for removal at treeae having a trunk six inks or more in diameter when measured tour feet abo n the ground. This requitement will be eatisfted as a& tree removal permit will be ra' jred for the red aaavaal of trees with trunk diameters of mix inches or more Ld diameter. Xn addition, in an effort to renters the aesthetic value of the approximately 574 secoo l- grow h Douglas Jars and maple trees to be removed, a treat raeplec ement plan shall be submitted. This plan shell attempt to fsaitigets the lona at approximately 175 trees through the replacement of cz a --tom of the ronsoved trees or app.,raxsimatoly 200 tr et e. This provision shell be in addition to i#tat is shown on the proposed landscaping p7.aw4 Tres replacement shall be concentrated among the eastern property line to buffers/Id screen the proposed devel0p2 ft from Interstate 4. Ala./Insure adequate short term screening, as; ae&jowity at the replacement trace shell be of signifies= 61110r The applicant might consider Ueing a portion of the State of Oregon right. -of -Dray bong tntstetats 5 for s replacement and and aareeening. 1(gulag_721*f section 111. t00,015 requires that the applicant submit et isatiasaspLnq plan, This tegitir6amdt has hams estistl.,ad se the applicant has submitted *plan indiJatAtinq the number, tj>•pes and location of trees and shrub*. aloes Sec:Loa 14.114.130 (C) 'Late the type of allowable gigue and algn tee permitted in the 0.4 soon. All saiq ae shall conform to the provieiong lista4 in this odds section. All signs shall be aasppreved through the Sign l >er it procasa as aadmL ietered by than ?1snaLaeq Division. " o anted-in-landscaped 'n . s V.ctlou 14.100.110 (A) estates that tress 1 *11 bo p_Z islands in all parking areas and abal3 DO equally distributed and on the bailie of on* tree tot each mov+en parking epaac see in order to provide A canopy eeffeot. I hoe minims* siin zeien Of the landscape island* shall be three teeett and the 1a>uladteaapi nq shall be protected from erehicuuler damage by soma foray de yrtaeeel, guard or aUrb. rLity. one Naar Are Xerquiried g'or this ate Under the provLatiioo of thin coda saatLdta. The proposed site plan Lad: testes the provision of tweets lecited on the end* Of the parktng ierl±rss. 71'hl.s site plats tebeli be r:ewi.tid to LncU.cati tb* prarisLon of to ae4ditidutt puking lot trees and landscaped Wands ds to be 1.00eted wtthLA the interior erior parki ng lot area, in noccedartc a with !Arse provi .Loan of this =lox or =talent U0A 91 . 0017 811ZUOLOCICOArOODei PAdIt 9 a "1208/03 7"4:08 13e$O3 084 e 7 cam* ry--- .. ...•— _.__,��14 /Olx t IIIMMELAWA. '# , �4est9C.a. 1.s!? »1 afanrxsetna eseaai:lum 111.31 eegu xers t new cvnotxmo �aorperatee funotionei end •Adequcta�te apece for on -site storage and Off'1Lc1.*rtt coi1m. tic a of nimPAI .0o).14 emote and soutacee. $*p* 'atted recycloblen prior to ptek -up rod sea fterab by Mvi sre. The eGppelicr.rat shell utxoeetta one of the follo+viel four methode to demonstrate compliance* * attatuusa eundaed, Waste ess eeewa eet Coapret,Jessive recycling plans or i'rwhited hauler review and eigzt -off. The atppl.ia*zzt will mold to submit evidence or a plant which indi setote cteatt±pi.,4eecie with tree *action. R. PUNZZC rAcm err Wide re ctit7ns e,Lagit atausg et mete), fa rzi& i (Qerpttr deeoteet:), e le 4.r 3+ (etre rm Drains) •Stall be 'satisfied es specified below: Lt,. Streets* Acrea:atf to the ei,te Le provided by two drivevdetys fraae SW 7204 Avenue. a major collector. This rite oleo front** along the s X'4S freeway to the south end ea.et. ttmithee:r the south or team frorxt:eergse has direct aoeleaa to the R -8 fr mmy. Vat £rontae o e Along CPI 72nd Avenue ban bon improved with a curb. Any remaining improvement/0f iecl.uding the aideerwelk, needed to fully improve the frontage will be required. 11t. 72r d/btaarhaeo itatertaeeattotaa The 72d /Durhetm itaterreeea cn ion Lei auereeently at three-Way, tae intereection with t:reffio signal control. The prapo ed eoject would iaoiude a driveway connection *It h.n Lnt ereecti on, adding a fourth leg to the intereeatinra. Y evi Lc it to the traffta eignale Would to reeuired. • The ppa;create driviee y would create et drivewey intersection approui •teal. 40 loot *met of the 72nd traffic nigntt. ?lay queue ilea Wsets of two eeshicle, at this junatiw uattld pet ntLexlly ebetrmtct the driveway izttetreection. Thl,ez oauld cause vehicles enterine the site to block the 72nd /Durhare intereeeectiort. This driveway is Ciao intended to be the pry truck entrance. L creeeeeLeoq the potential foe opetreyatioual prat:a tes when trhe driveway acdeee is blocked. The leseeinattisei department finds this design gn to be erutatiefactory, due to itee potential to impede ttatffia see name ete alt the 72ed £Qteree c ion. The applice nt•a eeogineyer !nut eeubeaeiut:eted eaa3 alternative planes which provil+le a for the driveway erlanq the north aside of the building to be one -Nay Westbound. This titexretatLve t:eetalaeee the driveway oo t LLat e.nd will be required. 1C• 72nd/eprteAg^opo;rt Materrecti ont t*te:rerstlyr the interneotiort of 72eid Aveesee, Bridgeport Stood and renew ftoolleea Ferry Read ham att7betzntial apeezeattte3nal ptobtansia. avttthbound treaffic au 72nct hae d ffictilty tuning left at the intereetotiou fed often partially blocks the intereew. fin. While tiler purposed develapetee et bate hot caused thin peoblem. the City of Tigard r cdSil to mho mere that the propeee d development doe. not substantially Late:reeeve the traffic opex*tionea p.=111141;4 at this intersection. The ap)plice nt hes e a herittie e a traffic seat' t; which parapoeeeur ammo Isprotamintie to reduce the prolate me at the interesootioo. The ickeereeente include ahtn ees to the tareffi.ea s guel, a pe rations*, addition tiorcos or oraxszorr n , 0017 set r der0e>as 10 • �..- as a v 4 I'„VP,......DIV U 4 of a dualtl aeftt.toern lane for southbound 72nd traffic with a protected si,grtal phase, and addition of dua.L right -turn lame sore northbound Laawer true traffic. The Croaa walk 4.Att1 the °sat aide of the intersection would be eliminated to allow tile eia nal pheeieg to work. Pedestrians would be routed approximately 140 feet sleet to the cra:leae;e,relbc at the traffic *kraal at the southbound x.6 rasp*. The propt+aae4 revioLons would increase the walking diaataa.nce betme ee the Tri e.Xet overflow park- and.ridm lot earth Of the intersection and Was aenaLo park-and-ride 4 t south of the intersection. This would affect Clay paeaaaeagere caV ,ng the i bounei basses to rorta and, which atop only at the south lot. 4Q around Wanes haw separate hue steps at both the north end aeeeut:h let*. The stalking f ng di.staanceee problem could be mitigated by constructing a w.Nlkeaaay commotion between the Iota and the cwosswe]k at the aeuthbouud raope. The traffic report aaungesetse a pedectrian orverar eeing as a potan .al d otutLnu. The 72nd /nridgtport tntereecti ou is outside the City of Tigard. Xt is within the city of Tasaiati a but under the Nec'i edicti an of OVOT and tfaahLngrton County. Tuel,atitin hum expressed aeuppai t for the propooed revi.4iaans. kasabi,ng on County l,e still reviewing. the prruponal. Attar elecuaming the proposed r evieiote with ODOT and Ta:i -Met, the Zngin.aring Oepezteout felts' that the revisions sions atto tild be implemented. The currant situation is nnsatiefaotary. Any other solutions that have bract aautggest:ed could Oa wiry expaen i e. If the development in approved, the Sngi ne Bring Pae> artnent reeoomenda that the applicant be rege red to oonetruct the signet and turn lane revisions, alona7 with a podctstrian connection from the Tri -8mt late to the crosewalk at; tts reap intersection. The pedaeatrim% averoroeeing would be very eicpent+ive and seems nnjuatified at this time. Any ooaditione on this intereeatiaa should be subject to approval by and Washington County. 2. SANZTARX aslant Sanitary oawot service ta provided by an eyx9.eting public line an the intersection of S.W. Durham hoed and sW 72nd Avenue, There le no haled to aaxteaad tine public Line to prolide service to aadlacent parcels. 3. ValarRCZ WIZErit id.Ctt•.ors a Storm water run-off will be eal,lectead it a private aayetxaam and , directed to one of several. proposed dry we1.Za ttbaoa ghfout the site fair diappaanal. In addition to pravidinq dispoeat for on.lite ran -off the applicant praises to doe the dry vain for en•site aortae* water treatment. Accordingiyo the applicant ahot3.d etaow that the prnpaeed dry wells have edaa7tieate hydrologic Capacity to diapers) of the on -site run -off as veil Ms pravi.cte for are/Arafat ciao required by um' tweeQLutLoe and Order Ao., ele i.. tratices tiatiee wee publirebod in the newspaper, pocked at City Beall and mailed tot The appLicautt tad owner& aaianare of rec rd within the required diatance NO T/41 or if cx4zof 3Int *1 +• Mt/ szwanaximeatrooDs mom .t ,e1,•l.� ... _ lx7QaTva' /' 7 "-1C'ilua--as; (4�1 t_'�t Y, ur 'i t�� Th+a rfl'aated Citissa ravolvement Team neprsesetative .. .. :11°2o goverment aq uc£arar a. ��$ T1t1 V*QXZxct am= am rXNZ oz ..�,,..�.._ r aft 3, Maas Any party •tea the decision nay appeal this decision in accordance with, Section Migna 91AL s Section �, ,Q of the C xriity P VOLOp'aut Code w t previa/re that a writ+lsaaets appeal must he filed with the city Recorder wltehia 1.0 day* after notice Ls 0.7014 0.144 preset. dal fee ochedule and forms are available at Tigard city mil, 13113 611 N .0 331'rd. , ?3gasxdr Oretort. The deadline Xoa: filing of an appeal is 3130 p.m. 4. Quaglkut If you ha<vc (portion*. L4eaes cal City of Tigard Rlanning Department (633- 4371), city of Tigard City Ball, 13%.25 GW Nall Blvd.. Tigard, Ort9ott 97223 PAS= Dr: William D,-.. sa Aal ss 4.astaatt 91ammeAr a,♦ r, actor, C mm unity Dar nt; �...BM' DUX NG1'xC.2i 030 DE S =A 93 « 0017 £YNCHA (JflItch900DI 0 12 May 1, 1995 Stuart Bingham Bingham Investm 3939 NW St. H Portland, OR 97 Dear Mr. Bing This letter is i Review (SDR a final decis 28, 1995. Tigard Co written re ent Company Tens Road 210 ham: CITY OF TIGARD 0REG09! i n response to your request for extension of the approval period for Site Development ) 93 -0017. A decision was issued by the City of Tigard on December 8, 1993 with ion on December 20, 1993. The original 18 month approval period will expire June mmunity Development Code Section 18.120.040 allows the Planning Division, upon quest, to grant an extension of the approval period not to exceed one year; provided that: 1.) No changes are made on the original site development review plan as approved by he Director; 2.) The applicant can show intent of initiating construction on the site within the one year extension period; and 3.) There have been no changes to the applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions on which the approval was based. The Planning Division finds that these criteria are satisfied. No revisions have been made to the approved site plan. The applicant's letter states the intent to construct within the one year extension. No substantive changes in the plan or ordinance provisions on which the decision was based have been made: The Planning Division, therefore, concludes that the request for extension of the approval period for SDR 93-0017 is consistent with the extension approval criteria. The approval period is hereby extended to rune 28.1996. Please note that no further extensions beyond that time are permitted without a new site development review application and decision. If you have any further questions or comments, please contact me in the Planning Department at 6394171. Sincerely, William ['Andrea Assistant Planner h:Vogin\wilAsdr91- 17,1tr 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tlt ard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 634.2772 April 25, 1995 t B INGHA. ONSTRUCTION NC. 9 SELWYN A. BINOHAM SELWYN BINCHAM, JR. STUART GINGHAM CLARK BINt3HAM City of Tigard Atten: Will D' Andrea 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 -8199 GENERAL CONTRACTORS 3935 N. W. ST. HELENS ROAD 22224 -22576 FORTLANYn, OREGON 97210 Re: Bingham Site Dear Will: You will recoil recall a Site Design Review application was approved on December 8, 1993, for the Bingham property on S. W. 72nd Avenue (City File No.SDR 93- 0017). While the property has not yet been developed, it is anticipated that final design will be completed soon, and permit application will be submitted to the City, However, it will not be possible to begin " Substantial Construction" within. the 1 1/2 year time period prescribed by Section 18.120,040 of the Code, Therefore, this is a request to extend the approval period for the allotted one year to June 8, 1996. Section 18.120,040 (c) of the Code provides three required criteria for a time extension: "1.No Changes are made on the original site development review plan as approved by the Director," Comment: No changes are proposed at this time, If changes are proposed in the future, they will comply with Section 18.120.070 regarding changes to an approved plan. "2.The applicant can show intent of initiating construction on the site within one -year extension period; and" Comment: It is our intent to initiate construction as soon as tenat negotiations are complete and permits can be issued, We expect that this will be achieved during the prescribed one-year extension "3, There have been no changes to the applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions on which the approval was based. Comment: We are not aware on any changes that affect the extension approval, It is my understanding that the City does not require payment of a fee for consideration of this time extension, and that this letter will be sufficient to initiate the request, Please call me if you have questions or need further information, In my absence, please contact Lans Stourt at Mackenzie /Salto & Associates, Sincerelyt ',r stuart Biigham g BINGIIAM INVESTMENT C.O. cc: Lans Stout - Mackenzie /Salto & Associates • ;1• , nn, AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard t, ( ¶ VV76LV , being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath ) depose and say: (Please print) That / am a for The City of Tigard, Oregon. That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING POR: L"-That 1 served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Planning Commission Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard City Council A copy (Public Hearing Notice/Notice of Decision) of which is attached (Marked Exhibit "A") was mailed to each named peons at ths-it a ,ddress, g! shown on_the attached list marked B arked exhibit "" on the I= day of .6=g111VJ( 1921_, said notice NOTICE OF D4ppxoN as heig2ttaghed, was postedon an appropriate bulletin hoard on the ilf: day of A4444,A54500/- , lri'r' ; and depos ted in the United States Mail on the St171aF7F1577-_, 19 r postage prepaid. Prepared Not ce 4Z10 Subscribed and sworn/affirm to me on the _LZf day of 194944Z. NOTARY PUBLIC OF 0'400N My Commistaion Expirest4LL14._ 11, • , .f• • • • `•h�}a a •o- �sF ;( ; -A CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDFt 93 -0017 BINGHAM INVESTMENTS / MEGAFOODS APPLICATION: A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a new 68,240 square foot grocery store. Zoning: C -G (General Commercial) Location: 16700 SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 2S1 13AD, tax lot 1700) SECTION I - DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section II. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, THE STAFF CONTACT SHALL BE MICHAEL ANDERSON OF THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. 1. Right -of -way shall be dedicated to the public along the frontage of the proposed S.W. 72nd Avenue right -of -way to increase the total of the dedicated and proposed right -of -way to a minimum of 30 feet from the Centerline. The description shall be tied to the centerline of the existing right -of -way of S.W. 72nd Avenue. 2. Standard street improvements, including concrete sidewalk, driveway apron, and street lighting shall be installed along the S.W. 72nd Avenue frontage. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to major collector street standards and shall conform to the alignment of existing adjacent improvements. 3. The existing traffic signal installation at the 72nd /Durham intersection shall be revised to provide signal controls for the north driveway from the site. Traffic markings on 72nd shall be revised to accommodate the projected traffic at the two site entrances. 4. The on -site driveway system shall be in accordance with the attached concept submitted by MacKenzie Engineering on December 1, 1993. 5. The intersection of 72nd /Bridgeport /Lower Boones Ferry shall be revised as shown in Figures 7B and 8B of the report titled "Bingham Site Development Traffic Impact Analysis" prepared by MacKenzie Engineering Incorporated and dated September 17, 1993. The pedestrian bridge shown on Figure 8B shall not be required; however, pedestrian connections shall be constructed between the Tri -Het park -and -ride lots and the crosswalk at the southbound freeway ramps. This work requires approval and permits from ODOT and Washington County. If requested by ODOT and Washington County, the City Engineer may require alternative improvements approved by ODOT and Washington County in lieu of the improvements shown in Figures 78 and 88, provided that the alternative improvements are similar in cost and provide similar traffic operational improvement. If requested by ODOT and Washington County, the City Engineer may accept payment of a fee in lieu of intersection improvements. The pedestrian connections to the park - and -ride lots will require approval from Tri -Met. If requested by Tri -Met, the City Engineer may delete the requirement for the pedestrian connections. NOTICE OW DECISION SDR 9S - 0017 HIND 4.M /MEGAfOODS PAGE 1 6. Building permits will not be issued and construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering Department has reviewed and approved the public improvements plans and a street opening permit or construction compliance agreement has been executed. A 100 percent performance assurance or letter of commitment, a developer-engineer agreement, the payment of a permit fee and a sign installation /streetlight fee are required. 7. The proposed privately operated and maintained sanitary sewer and storm drainage system plan - profile details shall be provided as part of the public improvement plans. 8. The applicant shall demonstrate that storm drainage run -off can overflow from the site without significantly impacting properties downstream. 9. Sanitary sewer and storm drainage details shall be provided as part of the public improvement plans. Calculations and a topographic map of the storm drainage basin and sanitary sewer service area shall be provided as a supplement to the public improvement plans. Calculations shall be based on full development of the serviceable area. The location and capacity of existing, proposed, and future lines shall be addressed. 10. The applicant shall provide connection of the proposed building to the public sanitary sewerage system. A connection permit is required to connect to the existing public sanitary sewer syetem. 11. The applicant shall provide for on -site water quality treatment as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91 -47. Submitted design calculations shall be in conformance with the general requirements of "infiltration facilities" and the specific requirements of "infiltration sumps" of Chapter 2 of Surface Water Quality Fa.cilitiee Technical Guidance Handbook, USA, 1991. , 12. The applicant shall obtain a "Joint Permit" from the City of Tigard. This permit shall meet the requirements of NPDES and Tualatin Basin Erosion Control Program. 13. The grading plan shall comply with Chapter 70 of the State of Oregon Structural Specialty Code. 14. Revised site and landscaping plans shall be submitted for review by the Planning Division, Staff Contact: Will D'Andrea. The revised plans shall include the following: a. Provision of eight disabled parking spaces, including one designated "van accessiLte ". b. Provision of 361 required parking spaces, by providing for 26% compact spaces, redesigning the spaces along the east property line to 90 degree angle parking or through a reciprocal parking agreement with Tri -Met. The reciprocal parking shall be utilized when the hours of operation do not overlap. c. Landscaping near driveway entrances shall meet visual clearance standards. d, provision of an additional 12 parking lot trees in landscaped islands to be located within the interior parking lot area. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands and shall be equally distributed and on the basis NOTICE OF DECISION 5Dt 93 00 BXNOHAM /MEGAFOODS PACE 2 b.. of one tree for each seven parking spaces. The minimum dimension of the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. e. Raised crosswalks or "speed humps" to delineate the two pedestrian crossings connecting to the main entrance. f. A plan which shows compliance with Community Development Code Chapter 18.116, Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage. The applicant shall choose one of the following four methods to demostrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling plan or Franchised Hauler Review, and Sign -off. g. A tree replacement plan providing for one - third of the removed trees or approximately 200 replacement trees. These shall be in addition to what its shown on the proposed landscaping plan. To ensure adequate short term screening, a majority of the replacement trees shall be of a significant size. Tree replacement shall be concentrated along the eastern property line to further buffer the proposed development from Interstate 5. The view corridors for signs may be identified by the applicant so that the plan selected provides the maximum amount of screening while allowing visual access to the wall signs after the trees mature. h. Screening for service facilities and refuse containers. i. Exterior elevation plans showing that meets the maximum height requirement. Wheel stops, at least four inches high back from the front of the parking pedestrian corridor linking the main south parking lot. This provision will flow of pedestrian movement along this the building height located three feet stall, along the entrance with the encourage the free corridor. k. Provision of five foot sidewalks along both access drives. The sidewalk on the south access should be located on the south side of the drive. The parking island shall include a pedestrian refuge and a crosswalk should be installed connecting the sidewalk and pedestrian refuge island. The sidewalk on the north access should be designed through the preserved stand of Douglas Firs. 1. Provision for the 18 Red Sunset Maple street trees to be planted with a minimum caliper of two inches at four feet in height. m. Covered bicycle racks. 15. Separate tree removal permits are required for the building area and parking lot. A tree protection plan shall be submitted and the applicant will install tree protection fencing prior to the start of construction. This fence is to remain in place throughout the duration of construction. It should be placed as far from the trees as is practical, but not closer to the tree than one foot behind any necessary excavation line. Any necessary intrusion into the tree protection area must be with approval of the Planning department. When the clearing NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 93 - 0017 SINOHAM/MEOAFOODS PAGE 3 limits are determined and staked, a tree condition analysis and program of therapeutic care of the protected trees will be required. A revised tree inventory of the parking lot area shall be submitted. An arboriet report and protection plan identifying locations suitable for additional parking lot tree retention and protection shall also be submitted. It should also identify potential trees to be used as replacement trees. IN ADDITION THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE; THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST. 1. SECTION 18.120.060 BONDING AND ASSURANCES A. On all projects where public improvements are required the Director shall: 1. Require a bond in an amount not greater than 100 percent of other adequate assurances as a condition of approval of the site development plan in order to ensure the completed project is in conformance with the approved plan; and 2. Approve and release such bonds. B. The bond shall be released when the Director finds the completed project conforms to the approved site development plan and all conditions of approval are satisfied. 2. SECTION 18.164 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS A. 18.164.180 Notice to City Required 1. Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance. 2. If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until the City is notified. THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE DATE OF THE FINAL DECISION. SECTION II. FINDINGS OF FACT, 1. Backround: This parcel was annexed to the City of Tigard in 1976, and was zoned I -L (Light Industrial). A Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA 90-0004) and one Change ( ZON 90-0002) was approved in 1990, changing the zoning from I -L (Light Industrial) to C -G (General Commercial). NO subsequent land use applications have been filed with the City for this site. 2. Vicinity Information: The site is bounded on the west by SW 72nd Avenue, on the east by I-S, on the north by the Oregon Business Park, and on the south by a Tri -Met Park & Ride lot. Surrounding uses and zoning designations are an industrial park zoned I-L (Light Industrial) to the north; and the former Washington County quarry, which is zoned I -P (Industrial Park) is to the west. Industrial development is the predominant land use on the west side of the freeway interchange, whereas commercial development is the predominant use on the east side. NOTICE OF DECISION :1D t 93 - 0017 BINOHAM /MEGAFOODS PAGE 4 SW 72nd Avenue is designated as a major collector street. An extension of Durham Road and traffic signal control improvements at the SW 72nd Avenue /Durham Road intersection have recently been completed. South of the proposed site is the SW 72nd Avenue /Bridgeport Road intersection. This intersection is outside the City of Tigard. It is within the City of Tualatin but under the jurisdiction of ODOT and Washington County. Currently, this intersection has substantial operational problems. 3. Site Information and Proposal Description: The 6.6 acre undeveloped site is generally flat and is slightly below the grade of the freeway thereby providing substantial exposure to freeway traffic. There is a stand of large Douglas Fir trees on the site along with smaller deciduous trees and low -lying brush. The applicant requests approval to construct a new 68,240 square foot grocery store, as illustrated on the attached site plan. The propoed site would include 354 parking spaces with five (5) designated handicapped spaces and 24 bicycle racks. 4. Other Staff Comments: No other comments have been recieved. 5. Agency Comments: Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: Prior to final approval and issuance of a building permit: 1) Submit plans, obtain Engineering Division approval, and obtain a facility permit for construction of the following public improvement: Any additional off -site safety improvements found to be required for compliance with R &O 86 -95 upon completion of the County Traffic Analyst's review. These improvements shall be constructed in accordance 4ith the requirements of the Washington County Uniform Road Improvement Design Standards; 2) Prior to Occupancy, the road improvements required by condition 1 shall be complete and accepted by the County. The City of Tualatin has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: If such a project were approved we would strongly encourage Option 4 of the Traffic Impact Analysis, which calls for changing the signal sequence, restriping for dual -turn lanes and constructing a pedestrian bridge. Tri --Met has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: Tri• -Met is opposed to the removal of the existing pedestrian crossing. Tri --Met offers that one pedestrian crossing option not addressed is the provision of an added pedestrian activated signal phase for the east crosswalk. This phase would allow pedestrians to cross Lower Boones Perry Road while 72nd Avenue and Bridgeport Road traffic is stopped, and would primarily be used only during the AM peak period. The feasibility of this treatment, the impact on signal cycle length and other intersection operations should be evaluated. t'ri-Met will also consider the applicants proposal for 100 shared park and ride spaces in conjuction with other service or pedestrian circulation changes, Tri- Met requests that final decisions on the changes to the 72nd Avenue/ NOTICE OP D1 CxSXOti SbR 93 - 0017 F3lNGBAf /MEGAFOODS PACE 5 Bridgeport Road intersection be deferred until a better balanced, multi - modal solution can be achieved. Tri -Met strongly urges the City of Tigard to proceed with ODOT's short term recommendation #1. If the City recommends removal of the pedestrian crosswalk, Tri -Met requests that the Mega Foods development be conditioned to require provision of 100 shared park and ride spaces on the development site. The Oregon Department of Transportation has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: If the City of Tigard chooses to proceed with the proposed signal changes at the 72nd Avenue/Bridgeport/Boones Ferry Road intersection, we recommend addressing transit /pedestrian needs by doing one of the following: 1. Ieep both pedestrian crossings which connect the north and south lots and put in an exclusive pedestrian phase to provide pedestrians with a protected crosEing at the 72nd Avenue / Boones Ferry intersection. ODOT should be involved in the development and implementation of the signal phasing to ensure that it is not detrimental to the interchange. 2. Remove the pedestrian crossing at the 72nd Avenue / Boones Ferry intersection, but make necessary improvements to the pedestrian crossing at the Southbound Off -ramp / Boones Ferry intersection to provide safe and convenient access between the two park - and -ride lots. This may include the need to improve the southeast corner of the northern park- and-ride with stairs and /or ramp facilities. The Tualatin Valley Fire District has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: 1) Contact the Fire District's Fire Marshal's office for review and approval of the location of fire department connections; 2) No Parking signs shall be installed where driving surfaces will not accomodate 20 feet of unobstructed surface. Signs shall state "No Parking - Fire Lane -- Tow -away Zone - ORS 98.810- 812 ". Location of all signs shall be approved by the Vire Marshal's office; 3) Review and approval of hydrant losations will be coordinated with Tigard Water District. The Unified Sewerage Agency has reviewed this proposal and hae offered the following comments: A water quality facility and erosion control joint permit is necessary. General Telephone and Electronics has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: The developer shall be responsible to provide and place all conduit and trenches according to GTE specifications. Allow 45 -60 days from GTE Engineering completion to GTE construction completion. The Department of Environmental Quality has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 93 - 0017 BINGHAMMEGAFOOD8 WAGE 6 It is necessary to have a NPDES - Storm Water Permit for construction facilities over five (5) acres. The City of Tigard Building Division, Tigard Public Works, Tigard Water District, Northwest Natural Gas, Portland General Electric, have reviewed this application and have offered no comments or objections. No other continents have been recieved. SECTION III. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION A. COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Use Classification: The applicant has indicated that the proposed building is intended to be used as a grocery store. This use is classified in Code Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as Food and Beverage Retail Sales. Code Section 16.62.030 allows Food and Beverage Retail sales as a permitted use in the C -G zoning district. Minimum Lot Area: Section 18.62.050 states that there is no minimum lot area for parcels in the C -G zoning district. The site has an average lot width of approximately 450 feet, thereby exceeding the required 50 foot average minimum lot width. Developments within the C -G zone are required to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping for the site The applicant has proposed to devote approximately 49,216 square feet (16.5%) for landscaping. Setbacks: Section 18.62.050 states that no side or rear yard setback shall be required except where the C -G zone abuts a residential zoning district. This parcel does not abut a residential district and therefore there are no applicable side or rear yard setbacks. In addition, there is no front yard setback in the C -G zoning district. The maximum building height is 45 feet. The applicant states that this height requirement is satisfied, however neither the applicant satement or the submitted exterior elevation indicates the actual height of the building. A revised exterior elevation plan Shall be submitted showing that the building height satisfies this requirement. Minimum Off - Street Parking: Section 18.106.030(C)(18) requires a minimum of one parking space for every 200 square feet of gross floor area plus one space per every two employees. The proposed building is approximately 68,240 square feet. The required parking for this building is 341 spaces. The applicant has stated that the number of employees is 40. The required employee parking is 20 spaces. Therefore, the total number of required parking spaces is 361. The site plan and applicant statement indicate that 354 spaces will be provided, seven short of what is required. A revised site plan shall be submitted which provides for a total of 361 parking spaces. It is recommended that the applicant increase the number and percentage of compact parking spaces to the 25% maximum allowed by code. It is also recommended that the applicant redesign and change the parking stalls to a 90 degree angle along the east property line. The applicant may also utilize a reciprocal parking arrangement with Tri -Met. The reciprocal parking shall be utilized when the house of operation do not overlap. The Americans with Disabilities Act,-„DAL, which became effective on aanuary 26, 1992, requires eight disabled parking apace if 301 to 400 parking spaces are provided. Further, one in every eight accessible Spaces, but not lees than one , shall be served by an access aisle eight feet wide minimum and shall be designated 'van accessible". The proposed site plan ehows the provision of five disabled person parking spaces. A revised site plan shall be Submitted which indicates the NOTICE OF' DECISION SDH 93 - 0017 SINGHAM /MEGA'00b5 PAGE 7 • • (4_ • provision of eight disabled parking spaces, including one designated "van accessible". ilicyckekarking: Section 18.106.020(P) requires one bicycle parking rack space for each 15 vehicular parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areae, or pedestrian ways. Twenty-four bicycle parking spaces will be required for this development. The applicant proposes to install 24 bicycle racks, thereby satisfying this requirement. perlygwAy: Section 18.108.080 requires that commercial uses which provide more than 100 parking spaces provide a single access with a minimum access width of 50 feet with a minimum pavement width of 40 feet or two accesses providing a minimum access width of 30 feet with 24 feet to be paved. In addition, curbs are required as well as a five foot sidewalk. The preliminary site plan shows the provision of two accesses onto SW 72nd Avenue. The northern accees, located across from SW Durham Road extension, is shown to have a 45 foot access width which narrows to a 30 foot width heading south toward the parking lot. This access also serves a one-way westbound driveway which exits onto SW 72nd Avenue. No provision of a curb or sidewalk is indicated. The southern access provides for a 25 foot wide access width, with no provision of a sidewalk. The proposed site plan thereby only partially satisfies this requirement. A revised site plan will be submitted which provides for sidewalko, thereby satisfying this requirement. The north driveway sidewalk could be designed to meander through the preserved stand of Douglas Firs and connect with the other proposed walkway. This design would buffer the pedestrian from the traffic, not require the removal of trees and not infringe upon the access width. Xn ode r to provide greater protection and security for pedestrians entering through the south acoese, a crosswalk and pedestrian refuge island should be provided. A croeswalk, which extends from the sidewalk into the parking lot, would offer some identification of pedestrian movement but would still leave the pedestrian in the midst of a busy ingress and egress point. A redesign of the existing parking ieleilandscape island to include a pedestrian refuge area would increase pedestrian safety. Such an island, in conjuctien with a crosswalk, would greatly improve pedestrian crossing incentive and protection and should therefore be required. Walkways: Section 18.108.050(A) requires that a walkway be extended from the ground floor entrance of the structure to the street which provides the required ingress and egrese. A pedestrian crosswalk and walkway has been provided which connect the entrance of the building to SW 72nd Avenue through the preserved stand of Douglas rite. This criteria is thereby satisfied. Off-Street_loUsieLeoleeegg: Section 18.106.080 requiree that every commercial use having floor area of 10,000 square feet or more, shall have at least one offestreet loading space oft site. In addition, one space ellen be provided for each additional 20,000 square feet. The proposed 68,000 equate foot grocery store thereby requires four loading paces be provided. The propoeal indicates that four loading spaces are provided. Street Teees: Section 18.100.033 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be requited to plant street trees in accordance with eection 18.100.035. Section 18.100.085 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the NOTICE O DECISIoN SDR 93 - 0017 BINOBAM/MBOAFOODS PAGB 8 • MINIM size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The preliminary site plan indicates the provision of 18 Red Sunset Maple trees to be spaced 30 feet apart, thereby satisfying this requirement. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right -of -ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height. The code provides that obstructions which may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three and eight feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided all branches below eight feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30 foot distance along the street right -of -way and the driveway and then connecting these two 30 foot distance points with a straight line. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted which shows compliance with this requirement. Tree Removal: Section 18.150 contains standards for obtaining a permit for removal of trees having a trunk six inches or more in diameter when measured four feet above the ground. This requirement will be satisfied as a tree removal permit will be required for the removal of trees with trunk diameters of six inches or more in diameter. In addition, in an effort to restore the aesthetic value of the approximately 575 second - growth Douglas Firs and maple trees to be removed, a tree replacement plan shall be submitted. This plan shall attempt to mitigate the loss of approximately 575 trees through the replacement of one -third of the removed trees or approximately 200 trees. This provision shall be in addition to what is shown on the proposed landscaping plan. Tree replacement shall be concentrated along the eastern property line to buffer and screen the proposed development from Interstate 5. To ensure adequate short term screening, a majority of the replacement trees shall be of significant size. The applicant might consider using a portion of the State of Oregon right -of-way along Interstate 5 for tree replacement and screening. Landscaping Plan: Section 18.100.015 requires that the applicant submit a landscaping plan. This requirement has been satisfied as the applicant has submitted a plan indicating the number, type and location of trees and shrubs. Signs: Section 18.114.130 (C) lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the C -G zone. All signs shall conform to the provisions listed in this code section. All Signs shall be approved through the Sign Permit process as administered by the Planning Division. Screening,: Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) states that trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking' areas and Shall be equally distributed and on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension of the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. Fifty -one trees are required for this site under the provision of this code section. The proposed site plan indicates the provision of trees located on the ends of the parking isles. This site plan shall be revised to indicate the provision of an additional parking lot trees and landscaped islands to be located within the interior parking lot area, in accordance with the provisions of this section. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 93 0017 HIN'GHAM/ iEGAFOODS PAGE 9 Mixed Solid Waste and Recy lables Storage: Section 18.116 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated recyclables prior to pick -up and removal by haulers. The applicant shall choose one of the following four methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum standard,, Waste assessment, Comprehensive recycling plan, or Franchised hauler review and. sign -off. The applicant will need to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. B. PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS: Sections 18.164.030( E) (11 (a,l (Streets) , 18.164.090 (Sanitary Sewer) , and 18.164.100 (Storm Drains) shall be satisfied as specified below: 1A. Streets: Access to the site is provided by two driveways from SW 72nd Avenue, a major collector. This site also fronts along the 1 -5 freeway to the south and east. Neither the south or east frontage has direct access to the I -5 freeway. The frontage along SW 72nd Avenue has been improved with a curb. Any remaining improvements, including the sidewalk, needed to fully improve the frontage will be required. 18. 72nd /Durham Intersection: The 72nd /Durham intersection is currently a three -way, tee intersection with traffic signal control. The proposed project would include a driveway connection at the intersection, adding a fourth leg to the intersection. Revisions to the traffic signals would be required. The proposed driveway would create a driveway intersection approximately 40 feet east of the 72nd traffic signal. Any queue in excess of two vehicles at this juncture would potentially obstruct the driveway intersection. This could cause vehicles entering the site to block the 72nd /Durham intersection. This driveway is also intended to be the primary truck entrance, increasing the potential for operational problems when the driveway access is blocked. The Engineering department finds this design to be unsatisfactory, due to its potential to impede traffic movements at the 72nd intersection. The applicant's engineer has submitted an alternative plan which provides for the driveway along the north side of the building to be one -way westbound. This alternative resolves the driveway conflict and will be required. 1C. 72nd /Bridgeport Intersection: Currently, the intersection of 72nd Avenue, Bridgeport Road and Lower Boones Ferry Road has substantial operational problems. Southbound traffic on 72nd has difficulty turning left at the intersection and often partially blocks the intersection. While the proposed development has not caused this problem, the City of Tigard needs to make sure that the proposed development does not substantially increase the traffic operations problem at this intersection. The applicant has submitted a traffic report which proposes some improvements to reduce the problems at the intersection. The improvements include chances to the traffic signal operations, addition NOTICE OF DECISi ON SIR 93 - 0017 EINGH /f EGAPOODS PAGE 10 M1 W' • • of a. dual left -turn lane for southbound 72nd traffic with a protected signal phase, and addition of dual right -turn lanes for northbound Lower Boones traffic. The crosswalk along the east side of the intersection would be eliminated to allow the signal phasing to work. Pedestrians would be routed approximately 140 feet east to the crosswalk at the traffic signal at the southbound 1-5 ramps. The proposed revisions would increase the walking distance between the Tri -Met overflow park - and -ride lot north of the intersection and the main park -and -ride lot south of the intersection. This would affect only passengers catching the inbound busses to Portland, which stop only at the south lot. Outbound busses have separate bus stops at both the north and south lots. The walking distance problem could be mitigated by constructing a walkway connection between the lots and the crosswalk at the southbound ramps. The traffic report suggests a pedestrian overt ossing as a potential solution. The 72nd/Bridgeport intersection is outside the City of Tigard. It is within the City of Tualatin but under the jurisdiction of ODOT and Washington County. Tualatin has expressed support for the proposed revisions. Washington County is still reviewing the proposal. After discussing the proposed revisions with ODOT and Tri -Met, the Engineering Department feels that the revisions should be implemented. The current situation is unsatisfactory. Any other solutions that have been suggested would be very expensive. If the development is approved, the Engineering Department recommends that the applicant be required to construct the signal and turn lane revisions, along with a pedestrian connection from the Tri -Met lots to the crosswalk at the ramp intersection. The pedestrian overcrossing would be very expensive and seems unjustified at this time. Any conditions on this intersection should be subject to approval by ODOT and Washington County. 2. SANITARY SEWER: Sanitary sewer service is provided by an existing public line at the intersection of S.T. Durham Road and SW 72nd Avenue. There is no need to extend the public line to provide service to adjacent parcels. S. SURFACE WATER RUN -OFF: Storm water run -off will be collocted in a private system and directed to one of several proposed dry wells throughout the site for disposal. In addition to providing disposal for on -site run -off the applicant proposes to use the dry wells for on -site surface water treatment. Accordingly, the applicant should show that the proposed dry wells have adequate hydrologic capacity to dispose of the on -site run -off as well as provide for treatment as required. by USA Resolution and Order No. 91- 47. SECTION IV. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at city all and mailed to: XX The applicant and owners XX Owners of record within the required distance NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 93 0017 $INGHAM /MEGAFOODS PAOE 11 C XX The affected Citizen Involvement Team Representative XX Affected government agencies 2. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL 01 02-20-43 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 3. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.2900, and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. Appeal fee schedule and forms are available at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 p.m. M"413 . 4. questions: If you have questions, please call City of Tigard Planning Department (639-4171), City of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223 PREPARED BY: r . William D'Andrea Assistant Planner APPR D BY: E Mur .. hy, Director, C •mmttnity Development '1Q3 DATE DATE NOVICE OF DECISION SDR 93 0017 BINGHAM/MEGAMODS PAGE 12 ., " OREGON BUSINESS g,W, FINDLAY RD WATER QUALITY DIVISION ENVt INMENTAI UALItY • • • 2S113AD-00500 SWETT, CAM, R 13485 ATWATER LANE LAKE OSWE(O OR 97034 25113AC-00100 WASH CO FACILITIES MGMT-ADMIN 150 N FIRST RM B-7 HILLSBORO OR 97124 BINGHAM INVESTMENTS 3939 NW ST HELENS RD PORTLAND OR 97210 JOEL STEVENS 9660 SW VENTURA CT TIGARD OR 97223 ROBIN MCARTHUR-PHILLIPS 9002 SE MCLOUGHLIN BLVD MILWAUKIE OR 97222 KIM KNOX TIR-MET TRANSIT M. 4012 S8 17TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97202 1 jp B 2S113AD-01800 PACIFIC MALTY ASSOCIATES 15115 SW SEQUOIA PKWY #200-WM/ PORTLAND OR 97224 2S113AC-0010 PACIFIC 14TY ASSOCIATES 15115 S SEQUOIA PKWY #200 -WMI PORTIJthD OR 97224 A • • 9c)-- 1-83 WED 13:17 MSA /ME1 FAX N0. 5032749812 P,02 /02 401'1. 0 a ` 0 'pt ,0L ••• l' 0 .A" a Oi.• 1 + WMttMAMNrN1+ �+ 4+1+W7a�.N4- +n+��n•IwVC:►lur�ea � wKi*�M�blbbtl��w+wWMMnr+L.4� nerd 0, 90,00 N a LLI OD 8 1r w50 r ..0t\1 '9 u 6 e‘ ':PTO 0 ‘. 0 0 I p qe r vP COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INCI P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684-0360 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising c City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd, • PO Box 23397 Tigard,Oregon 97223 0 STATE OF OREGON, COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, being first duly sworn, depose and say„that I am the AdvertisincL Director, or his principal clerk, of the a.gara—Tualatin a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 and 193.020; published at__Tirgard_ in the afotasaid county and state; that _the slte Deve.A.92„22-00 i_Ln_gt.mmataaa_rsgasio a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for ONE ..successive and consecutive in the following issues: Si E •1VIE 1 .',V DR -.0 7 BI LOCATION: 16700 S.W. 72nd Ave (WCTM 2S1 13AD, tax lot 1700). The Director has approved, subj conditions, a Site Development Review request to allow construction 68,000 square foot grocery store, APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITE Community Development Code Chapters 18.62,050, 18.100, 18., 18.106, 18.108, 18,114, 18,120, and 18.164, ZONE: CO (Ooneral mercial). The C-0 zoning designation allows public agency an ministrative services, public support facilities, professional an ministrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, ness support services, general retail sales, and eating and drinkii tablishments among other uses, My Commission Expires: AFFIDAVIT v /:// The adopted finding Of facts, decision, and statement of candid() obtained front the Planning Department, Tigard Civic Center, 13 Hail Blvd., P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. The decision firrtil Any party to the decision may app decision in accor ance with Section 18,32.290(A) and Section 18', of the Community Development Code, which providei that a wri, peal may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent. line for filing of an appeal is 3:30 P.M., December 11 1993. 111730 Publish December 2, 1993. P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (603) 684-0360 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 ty of Tigard 125 SW Hail Blvd, Box 23397 gard,Oregon 57223 El Duplicate Attic irrt r,...., ., . w_...•_,... �.... +.... ,., ', , PM -111 I POOB►, LOCATION: 16700 S,W. 72nd Avenue (Wel 2S1 13A.D, tax lot 1700). The Director has approved, subject to conditions, a Site :)evelopmentl eview request to allow construction of a 68,000 square foot grocery store. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: w--� Community Development Code Chapters 18.62,050, 18.100, 18,102, 18,106, 18.108, 18.114, 18 +120, and 18,164. ZONE: C-G (General Corm mercittl) The C-0 ;coning designation allows public agency and ad- OF OREGON first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising , )r, or his principal clerk, of the�:.r garc -� u n �.rr spaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 3,020; published at T- Lgar.c in the paid county and state; that the be Develop. 9-0 17 SYnahlam,LM a Foods ed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the issue of said newspaper for - ONE - -- _successive and utive in the following issues: ministrative services, public support facilities, professional and ad- ministrati.ve services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, busi- ness support services, general retail sales, and eating and drinking es- tablishments arnoug other uses. it) Mt0 mmission Expires: AVIT ill t I I 4 7 I w•.» 7j I R G..a% � r••"P r,p,.� ,f ,..,. f ! /1 4.'/ hr I t r The adopted finding of facts, decision, and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard Civic Center, 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd., P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. The decision shall be raw on , Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 1832.290(A) and Section 18.32370 of the Community Development Code, which providei that a written ap. peal may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The dead- line for filing of an appeal is 3 :30 P.M., December 15..1991. TT7730 - Publish December 2 , 1993. ; • • • • • • . • "mu PARK AND RIDE •4::2 ismarmale....+1.60661.......terumaftneramodurr.moormq or ow.. mot woo .os, •-• S.W. 72ND AVE. 0 •"*". o PARKING Prttallan-ED, VWT 0 0 0 • PEOESTRtAN BRIDGE low •TRIIVIET PARK AND RIDE 116 ,$) 1E1MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 0690 SW SANCIROFT St PORTLAND, OREGON (503) 2244570 PO SOX 69039 FAX (503) 228-1285 VILLAGE IMO • ietavveveve. 01.11.11. • p ROPOSED CHANNEL • WASHINGTON COITNTY, OREGON • Department of Land Use and Transportation, Land Development Services 155 North First Avenue, Suite 350, Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 (503) 648-8761 FAX: (503) 693-4412 Tigard Planning Department P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 Re: TRAFFIC STAFF REPORT FOR BINGHAM SITE DEVELOPMENT RECEIVED PLANNING FEE 3 5 1994 February 14, 1994 Washington County has completed its review of the proposed development in relation to MO 86-95. Please consider the recommendations listed on page 2 the attached Transportation Staff Report as a supplement to the recommendations made for conditions of approval given to you during the City's development review process. If you have any questions please contact me at 648-8761. Tom Harry Associate Planner Attachment . February 7, 1994 Traffic Staff Report c. Lynn Baily Doug Norval Norm Rindall th\d:transp\trhoticamp t • • 1: WASHINGTON COUNTY Inter-Office Correspondence Date: February 7, 1994 TO Tom Harry, Associate Planner FROM : Doug Norval, P . E . , Traffic Analyst MA, SUBJECT: TRAFFIC STAFF REPORT BINGIHAM SITE DEVELOPMENT CITY OF TIGARD This report examines the traffic safety impacts of the proposed Bingham Site development, consisting of a proposed grocery store with 68,000 square feet of floor area, located adjacent to SW 72nd Avenue in Tigard. Recommendations are developed to ensure an adequate level of traffic safety as defined by R &O 86 -95. A traffic study, "Bingham Site Development Traffic Impact Analysis, Tigard Oregon ", Mackenzie Engineering Incorporated, September 17, 1993, was submitted for this development. The findings and recommendations given below are based, in part, on information provided in this traffic study. FINDINGS: 1. The portion of the site impact area affectir roads under Washington County jurisdication, based on 10 percent increase in average daily traffic, is described below. Link From To 72nd Ave Durham Rd Ext. Bridgeport Rd /Lower Boones F Rd 2. Intersections within the impact area under Washington County jurisdication were analyzed (AM and PM peak hours) with the fL ".lowing results: Turn Lane Signal intersection LOS Warrant Warrant SPIS 72nd /Bridgeport /L. Boones F NA NA IAA 3. The intersection of 72nd Avenue /Bridgeport Road /Lower Boones Ferry Road is under the jurisdiction of Tigard (north leg), Washington County (south and west legs), and ODOT (east leg and signal operation and maintenance). The accident history at this intersection indicates a pattern of left turn accidents due to lack of a protected left turn phase for the southbound left turn. 4. Other improvements recommended for this intersection by the applicantos engineer may have Merit, but are not directly • TRAFFIC STAFF REPORT BINGHAM SITE DEVELOPMENT CITY OF TIGARD February 7, 1994 Page 2 applicable to this Traffic Staff Report review under R&O 86- 95. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. At the intersection of S.W. 72nd Avenue at S.W. Bridgeport Road/Lower Boones Ferry Road, provide protected left turn phasing for the southbound left turn movement. c: Tom Wolch Massoud Saberian Gt\.,.\STAFF\585 .4 • V. ( /14 664 Foo t)3, firPR 044 4-7 y Er? -ro. De- cut gc-ph1e-7--,A4,61%)7 Tece.5 V3 OR WiTRoie 000 81Z 7 6 4 - e,00 Pat b-e( 0'7 (9.1 itee'r --rzees ft &)004-, ?Rop ?A-2,16m14-- oT Teems 7/eo7ecreb -27evee$ OP-5 "re la a TRe6,5 uf iqo R5plitcom$4,1T z 35'0 ID-1 'at i 5 rt 6 c;16* rte.-615-5 e, T ( FeP(IekcomA5Kir ge 70 • 6 TO: William D'Andrea FAOM: Robin McArthu hur F'hr It s p DATE. December 1993 SUBJECT: Revised Comments on Proposed Mega Foods Developrnent DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Region 1 FILE CODE: The Ottgon Department of Transportation (ODOT) has taken another look at the changes in traffic operations proposed at the intersection of 72nd Avenue /Bridgeport/Boones Ferry Road associated with the Mega Foods development. Please re • lace our corres • ondence of October 26 1993 with this memorandum. ODOT's primary concern is that the 72nd Avenue /Bridgeport/Boones Ferry Road intersection functions in a way that maximizes the efficiency of the nearby 1-5 interchange. That explains why we are recommending that Tigard, Tualatin, and Washington County seriously consider a long —term solution such as relocating the intersection to provide adequate distance between the intersect, n and the interchange. In t''e short —term, however, we are faced with a big dilemma. ODOT is also concerned with the need to proviota an adequate pedestrian connection between the north and south park—and—ride lots located at the intersection. If the city of Tigard chooses to proceed with the proposed signal changes at the intersection, we recommend that you address transit/pedestrian needs by doing one of the following: 1 j Keep both pedestrian crossings which connect the north and south lots and put in an exclusive pedestrian phase to provide pedestrians with a protected crossing at the 72nd Avenue /Boonesferry intersection. °DOT should be involved in the development and implementation of the signal phasing to ensure that it is not detrimental to the interchange. — OR 2) Remove the pedestrian crossing at the 72nd Avenue / Boonesferry intersection, but make necessary improvements to the pedestrian crossing at the Southbound Off-, ramp /3oonesferry intersection to provide safe and convenient access between the two park -and -ride lots. This may include the need to improve the southeast corner of the northern park -and —ride with stairs and/or ramp facilities. cc: Tamira Clark Laurie Nicholson Lee Gunderson Kim Knox, Tri —Met Randy Wooley, Tigard Ed Murphy, 'T ig rd parkride 9002 St: McLoughlin Miles iukiv, OR 97222 -7394 (5(13) (53 -30090 FAX (503) 653 -3267 '•p TM-COUNTY •f4vIeTROPOLUTAN TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT OF OREGON ti TRI -ME 1 Tu Aitteriqs System lynr 4012 S.E. 17TH AVENUE PORTLAND, OREGON 97202 December 3, 1993 William D'Andrea Tigard Planning Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR. 97223 Subject: Bingham /Mega Foods: SDR 93 -0017 RECEIVED PLANNINQ Ec071993 Dear Will, We have reviewed ODOT's revised comments on the proposed Mega Foods development and have new information to be submitted as part of the record. We strongly urge the City of Tigard to proceed with ODOT's short term recommendation to: "Keep both pedestrian crossings which connect the north and south lots and put in an exclusive pedestrian phase to provide pedestrians with a protected crossing at the 72nd Avenue /Boones Ferry intersection." If the City rejects ODOT's recommendation for the exclusive pedestrian signal phase, Tri -Met may be forced to re -route buses to ensure passenger safety at the expense of operational efficiency. We view the alternative proposal as creating an unsafe situation for our transit customers and do not support the out of direction inconvenience that the proposal presents. If the City recommends removal of the pedestrian crosswalk, we request that the Mega Foods development be conditioned to require provision of 1O shared park and ride spaces on the development site. This approach, which was originally proposed by the consultant and developer on page 5 of the traffic analysis, would partially mitigate the delays caused by a re- routing. We appreciate your consideration of this additional information and look forward to working with the City of Tigard and ODOT on future transit - related projects. Sincerely positail tfroy Kimberly Kn !'Project Coordinator cc: Bob Post, Tri Met Robin McArthur - Phillips, ODOT his Stout, MEI Joe Walsh, Tri -Met Lee Gunderson, ODOT Tom Wolch, Washington Co. • ;'.14 -U15p (7/91) v TO: William D'Andr a FROM: Robin McArthur -Phi lips DATE: December 1, 1993 SUBJECT: Revised Comments on Proposed Mega Foods Development on DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Region 1 PILE CODE: The Oregon Department of Transportation (000T) has taken another look at the changes in traffic operations proposed at the intersection of 72nd Avenue/Bridgeport/Boones Ferry Road associated with the Mega Foods development. Please replace our correspondence of October 26, 1993 with this memorandum. ODOT's primary concern is that the 72nd Avenue /Brldgeport/Boones Ferry Road intersection functions in a way that maximizes the efficiency of the nearby 1 -5 interchange. That explains why we are recommending that Tigard, Tualatin, and Washington County seriously consider a long -term solution such as relocating the intersection to provide adequate distance between the intersection and the interchange. In the short- term, however, we are faced with a big dilemma. ODOT is also concerned with the need to provide an adequate pedestrian connection between the north and south park-and-ride lots located at the intersection. if the city of Tigard chooses to proceed with the proposed signal changes at the intersection, we recommend that you address transit/pedestrian needs by doing one of the following: 1) Keep both pedestrian crossings which connect iiie north and south lots and pot in an exclusive pedestrian phase to provide pedestrians with a protected crossing at the 72nd Avenue /Boonesferry intersection. ODOT should be involved in the development and implementation of the signal phasing to ensure that it is not detrimental to the interchange. - OR 2) Remove the pedestrian crossing at the 72nd Avenue /Boonesferry intersection, but make necessary improvements to the pedestrian crossing at the Southbound Off - ramp /Boonesferry intersection to provide safe and convenient access between the two park- and -ride lots. This may include the need to improve the southeast corner of the northern park -and --ride with stairs and /or ramp facilities. cc: Tami.ra Clark Laurie Nicholson Lee Gunderson Kim Knox, Tri -Met bandy Wooley, Tigard al Murphy, Tigard parkride y0 9002 St McLoughlin Milwaukk, C tY 97222 -731-6 (5113) 65:3 -5090 FA,X (5113) 053 -126 • ;;, • -r 4 4t: , .. • . • . • MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD TO: Planning Department FROM: Greg Berry SUBJECT: SDR 93-0017 Bingham/Mega Foods Description: December 1, 1993 The applicant proposes to construct a 68,240 square foot grocery store at the southeast corner of S.W. Durham Road and S.W. 72nd Avenue. 1A. Streets: Access to the site is provided by two driveways from S.W. 72nd Avenue, a major collector. This site also fronts along the I- 5 freeway to the south and east without access. The frontage along S.W. 72nd Avenue has been improved with a curb. Any remaining improvements, including the sidewalk, to fully improve the frontage should be installed. J.B. 72nd/Durham Intersection: The 72nd/Durham intersection is currently a tee intersection with traffic signal control. The proposed project would include a driveway connection at the intersection, adding a fourth leg to the intersection. Revisions to the traffic signals would be required. The proposed driveway would include a driveway intersection approximately 40 feet from the 72nd traffic signal. Any queue in excess of two vehicles at the exit would potentially obstruct the driveway intersection. This could cause entering vehicles to block the 72nd/Durham intersection. The potential problem area is intended to be the primary truck entrance, increasing the potential for operational problems when the driveway intersection is blocked. We find this design to be unsatisfactory, due to its potential to impede traffic movements on 72nd at the intersection. The applicant's engineer has submitted an alternative plan which provides for the driveway along the north side of the building to be one-way ,iestbound. This alternative resolves the driveway conflict and should be required. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 93-0017 BINGHAM/MEGA FOODS PAGE 1 GI, , • on ' • • • 0 • •■• A J. I '0. d 1C. 72nd /Bridgeport Intersection: Currently, the intersection of 72nd Avenue, Bridgeport Road and Lower Boones Ferry Road has substantial operational problems. Southbound traffic on 72nd has difficulty turning left at the intersection and often partially blocks the intersection. While the proposed development has not caused this problem, we need to make sure that the proposed development does not substantially increase the traffic operations problems. The applicant has submitted a traffic report which proposes some improvements to reduce the problems at the intersection. The improvements include changes to the traffic signal operations, addition of a dual left -turn lane for southbound 72nd traffic with a protected signal phase, and addition of dual right -turn lanes for northbound Lower Boones traffic. The crosswalk along the east side of the intersection would be eliminated to allow the signal phasing to work. Pedestrians would be routed approximately 140 feet east to the crosswalk at the traffic signal at the southbound 1 -5 ramps. The proposed revisions would increase the walking distance between the Tri -Met overflow park - and-ride lot north of the intersection and the main park-and-ride lot south of the intersection. This would affect only passengers catching the busses inbound to Portland, which stop only at the south lot. Outbound busses have separate bus stops at the north and south lots. The walking distance problem could be mitigated by constructing a walkway connection between the lots and t1 crosswalk at the southbound ramps. The traffic report suggests a pedestrian overcrossing as a potential solution. The 72nd. /Bridgeport intersection is outside the City of Tigard. It is within the City of Tualatin but under the jurisdiction of ODOT and Washington County. Tualatin has expressed support for the proposed revisions. ODOT and Washington County are still reviewing the proposal. After discussing the proposed revisions with ODOT and Tri -Met, we feel that the revisions should be implemented. The current situation is unsatisfactory. Any other solutions that have been suggested would be very expensive. If the development is approved, we recommend that the applicant be required to construct the signal and turn lane revisions, along with a pedestrian connection from the Tri -Met lots to the crosswalk at the ramp intersection. The pedestrian overcrossing would be very expensive and seems unjustified at this time. Any conditions on this intersection should be subject to approval by ODOT and Washington County, ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 93-0017 BINC' /MEGA FOODS PACE 2 co! 2. Sanitary Sewer: Sanitary sewer service is provided by an existing public line at the intersection of S.W. Durham Road and S.W. 72nd Avenue. There is no need to extend the public line to provide service to adjacent parcels. 3. Surface Water Run -off: Storm water run -off will be collected in a private system and directed to one of several proposed dry wells throughout the site for disposal. In addition to providing disposal for on- site run-off the applicant proposes to use the dry wells for on -site surfaJe water treatment. Accordingly, the applicant should show that the proposed dry wells have adequate hydrologic capacity to dispose of the on-site run-off as well as provide for treatment as required by USA Resolution and Order No. 91-47. Recommendations: 1. Right -of -way shall be dedicated to the public along the frontage of the proposed S.W. 72nd Avenue right-of-way to increase the total of the dedicated and proposed right -of -way to a minimum of 30 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the centerline of the existing right -of -way of S.W. 72nd Avenue. 2. Standard street improvements, including concrete sidewalk, and driveway apron, and street lighting shall be installed along the S.W. 72nd Avenue frontage. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to major collector street standards and shall conform to the alignment of existing adjacent improvements. 3. The existing traffic signal installation at the 72nd /Durham intersection shall be revised to provide signal controls for the north driveway from the site Traffic markings on 72nd shall be revised to accommodate the projected traffic at the two site entrances. 4. The on -site driveway system shall be in accordance with the attached concept submitted by Mackenzie Engineering on December 1, 1993. 5. The intersection of 72nd/Bridgeport/Lower Boones shall be revised as shown in Figures 7B and 88 of the report titled "Bingham Site Development Traffic Impact Analysis" prepared by Mackenzie Engineering Incorporated and dated September 17, 1993, The pedestrian bridge shown on Figure 83 shall not be required; however, pedestrian connections shall be constructed between the Tri -Met park - and -ride lots and the crosswalk at the southbound freeway ramps. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 93-0017 BINGHAM /MEGA FOODS PAGE 3 This work requires approval and permits from ODOT and Washington County. If requested by ODOT and Washington County, the City Engineer may require alternative improvements approved by ODOT and Washington County in lieu of the improvements shown in Figures 7B and 83, provided that the alternative improvements are similar in cost and provide similar traffic operational improvement. If requested by ODOT and Washington County, the City Engineer may accept payment of a fee in lieu of intersection improvements. The pedestrian connections to the park-and-ride lots will require approval from Tri -Met . If requested by T'ri --Met, the City Engineer may delete the requirement for the pedestrian connections. 6. Building permits will not be issued and construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering Department has reviewed and approved the public improvements plans and a street opening permit or construction compliance agreement has been executed. A 100 percent performance assurance or letter of commitment, a developer - engineer agreement, the payment of a permit fee and a sign installation /streetlight fee are required. 7. The proposed privately operated and maintained sanitary sewer and storm drainage system plan- profile details shill be provided as part of the public improvement plans. 8. The applicant shall demonstrate that storm drainage run-off can overflow from the site without significantly impacting properties downstream. 9. Sanitary sewer and storm drainage details shall be provided a part of the public .improvement plans. Calculations and a topographic map of the storm drainage basin and sanitary sewer service area shall be provided as a supplement to the public improvement plans. Caculations shall be based on full development of the serviceable area The location and capacity of existing, proposed, and future lines shall be addressed. 10, The applicant shall provide connection of proposed building to the public sanitary sewerage system. A connection permit is required to connect to the existing public sanitary sewer system. 11. The applicant shall provide for on- -site water qual:ity treatment as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91 -47. Submitted design calculations shall be in conformance with the general requirements of "infiltration facilities" and the specific requirements of "infiltration sumps" of Chapter 2 of face Water uality it.es Technical Guidance Handbook ._USA 1991 ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 93 -0017 BINGI -AM /MEGA FOODS PAGE 4 u' 12. The applicant shall obtain a "Joint Permit" from the City of Tigard. This permit shall meet the requirements of NPDES and Tualatin Basin Erosion Control Program. 13. The grading plan shall comply with Chapter 70 of the State of Oregon Structural Specialty Code. IN ADDITION THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE; THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST. 1. SECTION 18.120.060 BONDING AND ASSURANCES A. On all projects where public improvements are required the Director shall: 1, Require a bond in an amount not grater than 100 percent of other adequate assurances as a condition of approval of the site development plan in order to ensure the completed project is in conformance with the approved plan; and 2. Approve and release such bonds. B. The bond shall be release when the Director finds the completed project conforms to thc, approved site development plan and all conditions of approval are satisfied. 2. SECTION 18.164 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS A. 18.164.180 Notice to City Required 1. Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance. APPROVt: 2. If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until the City is notified, Randall. R. Wool. City Engineer dj/N:\EWINEMSDA03-17.GN8 ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 93-001i BINGHAM/MEGA FOODS PAGE 5 .1 • r, .4 • J`. 1 -93 WED 13:17 MSA /ME I FAX NO, 5032749812 P.02/02 owl Cul C 0 Tunoona idV1O3 ribM1.1 .101 .1.10 r tom• nd� *moat.. N...YN. W.I.I .4111 Ili 141 cn r'''' .a. r /Ay1il.wN1!�WrA+� N w qle 7' 40:1Th w yl»ip, 1p!O4fOIMO r7 A4UMWOMVPiWAYA .OPMC 'sASRIO OK WXCVACIO 7tkq:NmW:l'11:3Ft OMOJ ue n...* w. Q 6 4 '4A /41 rY .JMWA..WAr. dW m.._.+•.e......w...1A41 0 aimeh N+ uO4fA.'uiro wcWat. +rlrt +«q».irkat,SOMe s. x...vMw111,1 IImiioio Vori idrwx: im..M . irwo ..,_...N...... 4.pt .ct ,•r . ' 10/26/93 16:59 V5036533267 P4f trer4 Fax Transmittal Memo 7672 L To Leo Company p 1,11,,Nn 1.616 . 7F rl . Fax # g' 9 Comments • •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.* .11••••■■■•41101••••■••••■••••••■•••••••••••••••••••..1.•••••••••••••• @bfOUT1 • • laphone# ••••••••.•••■•••••■•••••.••■•••••.••••••■••••••••••••N DATE: October 26, 1993 To: William D'Andrea ‘." From: Laurie Nicholson ODOT - REGION 1 1No1/001 No, 01 Paga$ oct „ imu, 3' ttt From Company L.:a Ur) eL ;OA° (5 6r7 Plat'961N- Fax*. Original DiSposiliont • , Destroy :Dept Charge :fairspW60# oft. ....o'er.. DRoturn D Call for pickup •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• on DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Rion 1 FILE CODE; Subject: Binham/Mega-Foods- City of Tigard The traffic report prepared by McKenzie Engineering Inc., included in the Mega-Foods application, adequately identifies the existing and future conditions at the /2nd Ave. Bridgeport-Boones Ferry Road intersection and the impact on the I-5 interchange. ODOT Traffic Operations supports proposed mitigation to provide dual tight and dual left turn lanes from Boones Ferry and 72nd, respectively, along with changing the phasing of the traffic signal operation. To accomplish this short-term measure, the pedestrian crossing on the at approach of the intersection will have to be removed. This would provide improved operations for the subject intersection, but would require out-of-direction travel for pedestrians. Please consider this in the City's review of the traffic analysis. A long-term solution should also be considered at this time. One solution would be to require relocating the intersection to provide adequate distance between the subject intersection and the 1-5 interchange. 'ODOT would look favorably upon a proposal submitted by the local jurisdictions for a project to relocate the intersection. Finally, one problem with McKenzie's traffic analysis is that it doesn't address the traffic impacts of the proposed development on the intersection of Upper Boones Ferry Road at 1Durham. • 1 734-030 (7-93) Thank you for the opportunity to review SDR 93-- 0017. have any quest,; :s, please call me at 653-'3'79. Laurie Nichol son Region Planning Assistant cc : Tamira Clark, Robin McArthur - Phillips, Robert Doran If you 9002 SE Mc Loughlin Miiwaulrie, OR 97222.7; (503) 6554090 FAX (503) 653 -3267 r • TRI- COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT OF OREGON TRI -MET 4012 S,E,17TH AVENUE PORTLAND, OREGON 97202 November 22, 1993 William D'Andrea Tigard Planning Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. T: , . ard, OR 97223 Subject: Bingham /Mega Foods: SDR 93 -0017 Dear William, This letter is in response to the meeting held between Tigard, ODOT and Tri -Met staff at ODOT offices on November 16th. During that meeting, 1 restated Tri -Met's opposition of removal of the pedestrian crossing from the eastern side of the interesection of 72nd Avenue and Bridgeport Road for the following reasons: o There is a significant detnand for Park and Ride at this location which will increase in the upcoming years. The existing $1,750,000 facility serves an increasing market demand for transit from residents and businesses within Tigard, Tualatin and Lake Oswego. o We consider the park and ride facility in its present configuration to be the best balance of public investment and multi -modal transportation choices including auto, bus, pedestrian and bicycle circulation. o Requiring an additional bus stop slows down service at the point of peak loading which will decrease ridership and create hazardous circulation requirements for buses. During the November 116th meeting, an alternative routing for inbound transit service was proposed by ODOT staff. Although we do not feel it should solely be Tri-Met's responsibility to generate transportation alternatives for purposes of informing the Mega Foods development review process, we agreed to evaluate the potential for an additional bus stop on the south side of eastbound Lower Boones Ferry Road. To fully evaluate this proposal, Tri -Met engineering, operations and traffic analysis staff conducted on -site surveys of two potential additional stop locations. The conclusion is that the proposed addition of a new stop on Lower Boozes Ferry Road severely compromises Tri -Met operations and is unacceptable. The results of our analysis follow: Option 1 -- Eastern Bus Stop -4 East of I -5 Southbound On -ramp Passengers from the north park and ride lot would exit the lot from its southeast corner via a new stair connection to Lower Boones Ferry Road and alight at the sidewalk at the base of the southbound off -ramp. Passengers would then activate the signal to cross Lower Boones Ferry Road with the light. They would then activate the pedestrian signal to cross the southbound on -ramp and walk approximately 90 feet to a new bus stop on the south side of Lower Boones Ferry Road. A. pedestrian connection must also be made between the south lot and the base of the southbound on -ramp to provide access for customers in closer proximity to this stop. The bus stop would need to accommodate an articulated bus. Necessary Improvements o 11 -foot wide bus pullout must be constructed extending south from the bike lane. o 5 -foot wide sidewalk adjacent to the bus pullout which should extend to an 8 -foot width where bus passengers will be boarding to meet AIWA requirements. o Impact on drainage /sewer pipe and freeway signage on south side of Lower Boones Ferry and infiltration trench on the north side of Lower Boones Ferry. o Pedestrian stair extending from the southeast corner of the north lot to the base of the southbound off -ramp. o Pedestrian stair extending from the northeast corner of the south lot to the base of the southbound on -ramp. Overall costs of these improvements would be approximately $50,000 to $75,000. This figure would need to be evaluated in greater detail before final agreements are made. Impact on Bus Operations This configuration will require the articulated bus to cross two lanes of traffic within a distance of approximately 250 feet. As ODOT staff has noted, there is a gap in the traffic caused by the double left turning movement onto the southbound on -ramp every 76 seconds. ]bus operation issues include traffic backup at the signal on the east side of the freeway, articulated bus maneuvering requirements and scheduling conflicts make this movement unacceptable. On -site observations by Tri-Met staff indicate that this movement is not possible during peak hours from a bus operations and safety perspective. 4 A , / Impact on Pedestrian Circulation This option reduces the current walking distance by approximately 250 feet. However, the route includes a 15 -foot drop in elevation between the lot and the street and requires pedestrians to cross a second roadway, both of which are considered to be detriments to pedestrian circulation. Pedestrians crossing south to north on Lower Boones Ferry must walk into a lane of right turning vehicles exiting the freeway which do not stop until the pedestrian reaches their lane. Impact on Auto Circulation Buses using the pullout will be out of the way of traffic on Lower Boones Ferry Road while loading passengers. When the lanes are clear between the bus stop and the northbound left turn lane, buses can pull out and merge during the gap in traffic without blocking lanes or causing dangerous merges with adjacent traffic. Required turning movements and stacking may still result in buses blocking more than one lane between 72nd Avenue and the ramps as they do today. This option keeps buses from stopping in the stacking area between 72nd Avenue and the southbound on -ramp. Option 2 _- Western Bus Stop -- West of I -5 Southbound On -ramp Passengers from the north park and ride lot would exit the lot from its southeast corner via a new stair connection to Lower Boones Ferry Road and alight at the sidewalk at the base of the southbound off-ramp. Passengers would then activate the signal to cross Lower Boones Ferry Road with the light to a pedestrian refuge between the eastbound right turn lane and the second lane. A pedestrian connection must also be made between the south lot and the base of the southbound on -ramp to provide access for customers in closer proximity to this stop. The bus stop would need to accommodate an articulated bus. Necessary Improvements o An 8 -foot wide pedestrian refuge between two lanes o Pedestrian stair extending from the southeast corner of the north lot to the base of the southbound off-ramp. o Impact on infiltration trench on the north side of Lower Boones Ferry. o Pedestrian stair extending from the northeast corner of the south lot to the base of the southbound on -ramp. Overall costs of these improvements would be approximately $50,000 to $75,000. This figure would need to be evaluated in greater detail before final agreements are made. :, . ,'t4 Impact on Bus Operations This option would require buses to turn into the middle lane of traffic to pick up passengers on the pedestrian refuge. Although this option increases the merge distance between the bus stop and the 1 -5 northbound left turn lane, the bus will be travelling with the bulk of the traffic, thereby making a merge extremely difficult and increasing the risk of accident. Impact on Pedestrian Circulation This option greatly reduces the distance from the north lot to the bus stop from the current operations. Similar to the previous option, however, it requires pedestrians to walk down a 15 -foot change in elevation. The pedestrian refuge would also be considered a less than desireable waiting area given the high traffic volumes on either side of it. Impact on Auto Circulation There is a significant potential for buses to be stopped in the lane of traffic to pick up passengers while the eastbound light is green, therefore taking up stacking area between 72nd Avenue and the southbound on -ramp. As stated in our earlier memo, we will have more information by the end of December to evaluate the option of 100 shared park and ride spaces on the Bingham property as recommended in MEI's development application. We request that final decisions on the changes to the 72nd Avenue /Bridgeport Road intersection be deferred until a better balanced, multi -modal solution can be achieved. Again, we appreciate the opportunity to respond to the proposed 72nd Avenue and Bridgeport Road intersection change which impacts operations of the Tualatin Park and Ride facility. Please call me at 238 -5859 if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, Kimberly Knox, Project Coordinator cc: Robin McArthur - Phillips, °DOT Tainira Clark, GMT Lee Gunderson, (DOT sans Stout, MEI Joe Walsh, Tri-Met Alan Morgan, Tri-Met Harry Saporta, Tri-Met Rick Kindig, Tr) -Met Trl- COUNTY M TROPOLITAN TPANSPORTATION DISTRICT OF OREGON TRI MET \� , _999T19 4012 S,E,17TH AVENUE PORTLAND, OREGON 97202 October 26, 1993 William D' Andrea Tigard Planning Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Subject: BinghamlMega Foods: SD'R 93 -0017 Dear William, Tri-Met appreciates this opportunity to respond to the Bingham /Mega Foods proposal at 16700 SW 72nd Avenue in Tigard. We also appreciate the high level of cooperation demonstrated to date by MEI, the project consultant, in our conversations, meetings and requests for information on this proposal. Tri*Met operates two park and ride lots to the south of the proposed development. These lots represent a $1,750,000 investment and remove over 350 peak hour vehicle trips from Interstate 5 and the arterial system. The 260 -space park and ride lot to the south of Lower Boones Ferry Road is at capacity; the 125 -space lot adjacent to the southern boundary of the Bingham property, on the north side of Lower Boones Ferry Road is approximately half full; and approximately 20 to 30 cars park on the shoulders of Lower Boones Ferry Road. From an operational perspective, these are viable facilities which respond to the public's high demand for park and ride at this location. The proposed removal of the at -grade pedestrian crossing with relocated pedestrian circulation is a significant compromise to operation of these facilities. For this reason, this memo covers two steps Tri-Met would like to see incorporated into the approval process which include additional traffic signal assessment and evaluation of the proposed shared park and ride tied to transit service changes or pedestrian improvements. Additional Traffic Evaluation The park and ride lots serve predominately peak hour, downtown - oriented trips. Tri -Met customers in the north lot must use the crosswalk on the eastern side of the intersection to cross Lower Boones Ferry Road to the south lot to access inbound service. The north lot is served directly by outbound service on the 1-5 off-ramp, and requires no pedestrian crossings for park and ride customers. This significantly reduces the number of PM peak hour pedestrian crossings beween the two lots. Bingharn /Mega Foods page two The traffic analysis proposes either requiring pedestrians to use the crosswalk 140' east of the intersection or construction of a pedestrian overcrossing. Tri-Met engineering staff has estimated that such a structure would cost approximately $250,000 and would eliminate several park and ride spaces in each lot. Either of these treatments significantly reduces the viability of pedestrian circulation. One pedestrian crossing option that was not addressed in MEI's traffic analysis is the provision of an added pedestrian activated signal phase for the east crosswalk. This phase would allow pedestrians to cross Lower Boones Ferry Road whale 72nd. Avenue and Bridgeport Road traffic is stopped, and would primarily be used only during the AM peak period. The feasibility of this treatment, the impact on signal cycle length and other intersection operations should be evaluated. Alternative Proposals Projected rrark and ride demand in the 1 -5 South /Tualatin area will require an additional 200 to 400 additional spaces by the year 2005. For this reason, Tri-Met is currently evaluating additional opporturdti.es for new facilities in this area MEI's traffic report includes a proposal for 100 shared park and ride spaces on the Mega Foods site TYi -Met will evaluate this proposal in conjunction with other service or pedestrian circulation changes. We are willing to move the timeline on this evaluation to be complete in mid - December, 1993 to accommodate the Mega Foods proposal. Please call me at 238 -5859 if you have any additional questions or comments regarding this project. Kimberly Knox, Project Coordinator cc. Alan Danaher, Tri -Met Lee Gunderson, ODOT Rick ICindig, Tri -Met Lidwein Rahrnan, ODOT Lans Stout, MEl Joe Walsh, Tri-Met Washington County Department of Land Use an.: jorie Transportation (FAX :693 -4412) Land Development Services cA: ' 155 N First Ave, Suite 350 Hillsboro, OR 97124 Date October 22, 1993 ftgard Planning Department P.Q. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 Re: BINGHAM SITE /MEGA FOODS - SDR 93 -0017 Washington County has reviewed this development application and submits the following comment and required conditions for access to SW Lower Boones Ferry Road and SW Bridgeport Road intersection, a County Minor Arterial and a County Major Collector respectively, via SW 72nd Avenue: COMMENT This development does not directly access any County roads. However, pursuant to the standards outlined in Resolution and Order 86 -95, the intersection of SW 72nd Avenue, SW Lower Boones Ferry Road, and SW Bridgeport Road may be within the 10% impact area of the proposed development. The County's Traffic Analyst has a copy of the applicant's Access Report and is reviewing it Upon completion of the traffic analysis for this development proposal, the County Traffic Analyst's findings and recommendations will be forwarded to the City. This review and the recommended conditions of approval which will be developed as a part of that review are required by Resolution and Order 86 -95 and Section 501 5.2.B. of the Community Development Code. REQUIRED CONDITIONS or APPROVAL A. PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL AND ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT: Submit Plans, obtain Engineering Division approval, and obtain a facility permit for construction of the following public improvement: Any additional off -site safety improvements found to be required for compliance with R &O 86 -95 upon completion of the County Traffic Analyst's review. These improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the requirements of the Washington County Uniform Road Improvement Design Standards. B. Prior to Occupancy the road improvements required by condition A. shall be complete and accepted by the County. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Please send a notice of decision and appeal information to the County upon completion of your review. We would also appreciate the opportunity to review a draft of the City's conditions pertaining to access to the intersection of SW Lower Boones Ferry Road and SW Bridgeport Road. If you have any questions, please contact me at 648 -8761. Tom Harry, Associate Planner c. Lynn Bailey, Doug Norval t�,r,trdnsp,bili9site.tiq REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO: I _. _., DATE : October 19, 1993 PROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 93. 0017 Bil►7 um 2'GA FOODS LOCATION: 16700 SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 251 13AD, tax 'Lot 1700). A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 68,000 square foot grocery store. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62.050, 18.100, 18.102, 10.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, and 18.164. ZONE: C .-G (General Commercial) The C-G zoning designation allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, and eating and drinking establishments among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your -gat Frm information supplied by various departments and a,. ,.. _ and ZrO rt o��t o information available to our staff, a report and :ec• o . -ndation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal i L e near future. If you wi.Pi to comment on this application, we need your comments by Oct. 29, 1993. Yo ay use the space provided below or attach a separate o�tter to return your c ents. If ou are unable to respond bx the above date, preask Bane ths..0 contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments f wr ring as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: _William D'Androa PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact _ of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. is Written Comments: / e)ec; zi-L' I 1 /6 c.;,e3_,-2‘,_ e '5e '114 ,. a.t .La .i , C", ") CA c) - (...."�...: ... .i K,,, (K"yl (.auPAA. ,f i7 L0.tz_ `�c- `t l.. . �l "+., C ° -! et- `,c,+ 7 1r 1,� .� � F' Ir _, L1 4" 4 A_ , CA'. L AL II c Name of Person Commentintw. / 46 p,41 2 / r Phone Dumber. � �-_� • �► ti . 4L�, 1T ��• T 15115 SW Sequoia Pkwy„ Suite 200 ���Portland, Oregon 97224 Pacific Realty Associates, L.P 503/624-0300 • Facsimile: 503/624 -7755 November 1, 1993 Mr. Richard Bewersdorf Senior Planner City of Tigard, Oregon 13125 S.W. Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 -8199 Dear Dick: RECEIVED PLANNINiC NOV 0 X39 Re: Bingham Development @ S.W. 72nd Ave, & Durham Rd. Intersection the " Proposed Development "). We have reviewed the Site Development Review Application submitted to you covering the Proposed Development. We have had the Mackenzie Engineering Incorporated ("MEI") Traffic Impact Analysis (the "MEI Report ") reviewed by another traffic engineer. On the basis of this analysis we have very grave concerns with respect to the traffic impacts this project will bring to the intersection of S.W. 72nd Ave, and S.W. Lower Boones Ferry Rd. as well as to the S.W. 72nd Ave. and S.W. Durham Rd. intersection just to the North. We believe that the proposed 68,000 square foot grocery store will create evening peak period traffic sufficient to overcome any benefit derived from the improvements recommended in the MEI Report. The intersection already operates inefficiently and the MEI recommended improvements will not provide sufficient relief to overcome the traffic impacts generated by this new development. The effect of the recommended reconfiguration of the southbound traffic lanes on S.W. 72nd Ave. to provide two left turn lanes to Lower Booties Ferry Rd. assumes that each of these lanes will share the traffic demand equally, This assumption also applies to the dual right turn lanes proposed for the Lower Booties Ferry Rd, northbound traffic attempting to access Lower Booties Ferry Rd. and the I -5 Freeway southbound at the signaled intersection. It is unlikely that the lanes will share all traffic demand equally, There will be traffic trying to cross lanes through both turning movements and this will reduce the benefit described in the MEI Report, The pedestrian bridge connecting the two Tii Met park and ride lots on the north and south side of the intersection is a very expensive structure, This bridge is discussed in the 11( Mr. Richard Bewersdorf Page 2 November 1, 1993 description. of Option (4) of the recommended traffic plan in the MEI Report. No Public funds should be put into such a structure. We do not believe that a pedestrian bridge is a viable part of the solution to the traffic problems at this intersection. A significant percentage of pedestrians offered such a structure as their access across a busy intersection will not use the elevated structure. They will attempt to cross the intersection on the surface without a crosswalk. This kind of pedestrian activity will cause further degradation of the traffic situation at this intersection. The alternative is to keep the existing pedestrian crosswalk. Of course keeping the crosswalk precludes the establishment of two right turn lanes not hbound at Upper Boones Ferry Rd. The high peak period traffic generation potential of a 68,000 square foot grocery at this intersection will create traffic that will snarl S.W. 72nd Ave. from the Lower Boones Ferry Rd, intersection up to the new signaled intersection of SW. 72nd and Durham Rd. We recommend that the Bingham Site Development Proposal be denied due to the traffic impacts described in this letter. We would be happy to sit down with you to discuss our concerns. Sincerely .PACIFIC REALTY OCIATES, L, P. Richard P. Buono Vice President cc: Lans Stout 111 Ell El I RIAU Wig 1111111111111.111%11111111111FIE ,P" (.1 lit 11111F111111 wigwam um.,■■•■..thromualestorimeretolotagro omeryowuraurarmore varoalenremestaar.v...aftworms.warenlaramot■ 0.111.0.10. MACKENZIE ENGINEEHING INCORPORATED 0690 S W BANCROFT SIFlEET • PO BOX 69039 PORTLAND. OREGON 97201 (503) 224.9560 • FAX (503) 228 1285 ■, Jo ID 1 Y1 DATE 1 I RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION -... TIME 0(D PERSON _LE—Lfaal2N/ COMPANY °Doi_ JOB NO. 2:7363,2 INCOMING CALL OUTGOING CALL f( PHONE NO.,13 g PO.LSLECAZI-6. SUBJECT: a■••worla... CC t SiLit44- (3/1)1tewv1-6)iiitgu4 Ottto Cia4j(clfrd- S 6A0.64e..A 4 1- ID7.e.)6 ouluto s HIFf4,660-77(TFA---7411 R E MA R KS A iA) TeR PR'7702 fQki±JJN 1E-045732-)Assiz_zo_ Au-Du) 0sE 1,1 6 <4.-„A.51- LtzeDZ '&0 s7oPPe-'t2 E_O_PO:11,..15_,00_23) _ID- rs Su6C.1,57-E1) 501_0770N 773 PZrnN 71W2wJ. DOT' IZEM_A(L5 PP0P,DUE F I ?ZS/Li _ltif.asp_61\r_LS_Pia()_ PWL..(1_11t,liELTID_Ltrl ev E-LOPRet\t"T TP-A FF. 1.C_/_._TELS_LE, Afe ofi 50077-1800a LlErtAM 1 ) Act_ P. AT14.5.E EX Pemot M 6 A lisck$6 110K1 7L-±..2LO_ILL:514.7 Low 1_6_6,27_64/ILVICATig 1\)111 N\LD PRizizEo P4einHeAlpgati ___Skj_CLjnill- 0 F IS 1:212_ffort has been made to accurately record this conversation. If any errors or omissions' are noted written response is required within five days of issue date. ( j alls.).1.10.1.111■•■•■•■11101 CITY Tlir OF TUALATIN PO BOX 369 TUALATIN, OREGON 9062 -0369 (503) 692 -2000 RECEIVED PLANNING October 280 19 9 3 William D'Andrea Tigard Planning Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: BINGHAM /MEGA FOODS SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Dear Mr. D'Andrea: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Bingham /Mega Food site development review `SDi 93- 0017). As this development is adjacent to the City limits and will impact Tualatin residents, the City has a number of concerns and comments. The most important concern is the potential increase in traffic generated by this project. Many of the issues and problems were outlined in Tualatin's previous comments regarding the original zone change (enclosed). If such a project is approved we would strongly encourage Option 4 of the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Mackenzie Engineering, Inc, This option calls for changing the signal sequence, restriping for dual -turn lanes and constructing a pedestrian bridge. The proposed pedestrian corridor to link the building to the Tri- Met Park and Ride is a boon to commuters who wish to walk to the store after work. For those commuters who don't wish to walk to the store, an access drive from the Mega Food parking lot to the Park & Ride may help reduce vehicle trips onto 72nd Avenue. Another concern is for the large grove of Douglas Firs. We would urge that as many trees be preserved as possible and that those that are saved be protected from encroachment and damage during construction. We would appreciate it if you can keep us informed of the progress of this project. Let as know if you can be of any assistance. Sincerely, 4tV Virginia Dodson Assistant Planner enclosure Lila: TCC- 3-0i LOCATED AT: 18680 SW Martinazzi Avenue ' Comments on City( .! Tigard CPA -0004 /COY 90--Q , Bingham /Speiker March 19, 1990 e Page 2 The analysis, p. 4, first sentence, states the I -5 interchange does not function adequately under existing conditions, however, the tables on pages 7, 8, 9 and 10 indicate that the existing 1990 levels of service are all B and C. The tables for Existing and Industrial Zoning also show levels of service at B and C, except for Lower Boones /McEwan Road at the a.m. peak hour. The tables for existing and Scenario 1 again show levels of service of 13 and C except for Lower Boones, /72nd p.m. peak hour. The tables for existing and Scenario 2 show B and C service levels except for two cases. It appears the tables on pages 7 and 8 do not support the statement that the interchange does not function adequately under existing conditions. We thank the applicant for having prepared the traffic analysis and we thank the City. of Tigard for requesting our comments. We agree with the traffic analysis that the north Tualatin, interchange and surrounding areas is a regional problem. The City of Tualatin strongly supports freeway and interchange improvements and understands that the City of Tigard does also. Should the requested land use changes be approved, we would encourage the City of Tigard to actively support future freeway. and interchange improvement projects. a Should you have any questions, please call me at 692 -2000. Cordially, James F. Jacks, AICP Planning Director jb c: City Manager City Engineer Assistant to City Manager -- Economic Development • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS RECEJVFf) PtA Ir!ING TO:-.- A DATE: October 19 1993 FROM: Tigard Planning Department i 1993 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT AEVZEW SDR 93 -0017 BINGHAM /MEGA FOODS LOCATION: 16700 SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 281 13AD, tax lot 1700). A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 68,000 square foot grocery store. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62.050, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, and 18.164. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zoning designation allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, and eating and drinking establishments among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Oct. 29, 1993. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 630 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: You. iAte We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: r1 of our office. Len___A_LLED5.112Eficuti.a..L.._febnASii " I *It ea Name of Person Commenting, P n C t+ i AMBOR1 _ Phone Number: 2:#1-9 - f-581 b7 6 OCT 19 1993 WATER QUALITY DIVISION DEPT. ENVIRONMENTAL _ UQ ALLY ANIMINSIEWMINEIL TO-COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT OF OREGON 4012 S.E. 17TH AVENUE PORTLAND, OREGON 97202 October 26, 1993 William D' Andrea Tigard Planning Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard e . 97223 Subject: Bingham /Mega Foods: SDR 93 -0017 Dear William, Tri -Met appreciates this opportunity to respond to the Bingham /Mega Foods proposal at 16700 SW 72nd Avenue in Tigard. We also appreciate the high level of cooperation demonstrated to date by MEI, the project consultant, in our conversations, meetings and requests for information on this proposal. Tri -Met operates two park and ride lots to the south of the proposed development. These lots represent a $1,750,000 investment and remove over 350 peak hoar vehicle trips from Interstate 5 and the arterial system. The 260 -space park and ride lot to the south of Lower Boones Ferry Road is at capacity; the 125 -space lot adjacent to the southern boundary of the Bingham property, on the north side of Lower Boones Ferry Road is approximately half full; and approximately 20 to 30 cars park on the shoulders of Lower Booties Ferry Road. From an operational perspective, these are viable facilities which respond to the public's high demand for park and ride at this location. The proposed removal of the at -grade pedestrian crossing with relocated pedestrian circulation is a significant compromise to operation of these facilities. For this reason, this memo covers two steps Tri -Met would like to see incorporated into the approval process which include additional traffic signal assessment and evaluation of the proposed shared park and ride tied to transit service changes or pedestrian improvements. Additional Traffic Evaluation The park and ride lots serve predominately peak hour, downtown- oriented trips. Tri -Met customers in the north lot must use the crosswalk on the eastern side of the intersection to cross Lower Boones Ferry Road to the south lot to access inbound service. The north lot is served directly by outbound service on the 1 -5 off - ramp, and requires no pedestrian crossings for park and ride customers. This significantly reduces the number of PM peak hour pedestrian crossings beween the two lots. Bingham /Mega Foods page two The traffic analysis proposes either requiring pedestrians to use the crosswalk 140' east of the intersection or construction of a pedestrian overcrossing. Tri -Met engineering staff has estimated that such a structure would cost approximately $250,000 and would eliminate sevt,. 4, park and ride spaces in each lot, Either of these treatments significantly reduces the viability of pedestrian circulation. One pedestrian crossing option that was not addressed in MEI's traffic analysis is the provision of an added pedestrian activated signal phase for the east crosswalk. This phase would allow pedestrians to cross Lower Boones Ferry Road while 72nd Avenue and Bridgeport Road traffic is stopped, and would primarily be used only during the AM peak periori. The feasibility of this treatment, the impact on signal cycle length and other intersection or itions should be evaluated. Alternative Proposals Projected park and ride demand in the 1-5 South /Tualatin area will require an additional 200 to 400 additional spaces by the year 2005. For this reason, Tri -Met is currently evaluating additional opportunities for new facilities in this area. MEI's traffic report includes a proposal for 100 shared park and ride spaces on the Mega Foods site. Tri -Met will evaluate this proposal in conjunction with other service or pedestrian circulation changes. We are willing to move the timeline on this evaluation to be complete in mid - December, 1993 to accommodate the Mega Foods proposal. Please call me at 238 -5859 if you have any additional questions or comments regarding this project. Kimberly Knox, Project Coordinator cc: Alan Danaher, Tri -Met Lee Gunderson, ODOT Rick Kindig, Tri-Met Lidwein Rahman, ODOT Lans Stout, MEI Joe Walsh, Tri -Met c.1 nal ‘4441‘u A CITY OF TUALATIN October 28, 1993 PO BOX 369 TUALATIN, OREGON 97062 -0369 (503) 692-2000 William D'Andrea Tigard Planning k2.Ipartment 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: BINGHAM/MEGA FOODS SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW RECEIVED PLANNING NOV 011993 Dear Mr. D'Andrea: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Bingham/Mega Food site development review (SDR 93- 0017). As this development is adjacent to the City limits and will impact Tualatin residents, the City has a number of concerns and comments. The most :important concern is the potential increase in traffic generated by this project. Many of the issues and problems were outlined in Tualatin's previous comments regarding the original zone change (enclosed). If such a project is approved we would strongly encourage Option 4 of the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Mackenzie Engineering, Inc. This option calls for changing the signal sequence, restriping for dual -turn lanes and constructing a pedestrian bridge. The proposed pedestrian corridor to link the building to the Tri- Met Park and Ride is a boon to commuters who wish to walk to the store after work. For those commuters who don't wish to walk to the store, an access drive from the Mega Food parking lot to the Park & Ride may help reduce vehicle trips onto 72nd Avenue. Another concern is for the large grove of Douglas Firs. We would urge that as many trees be preserved as possible and that those that are saved be protected from encroachment and damage during construction, We would appreciate it if you can keep us informed of the progress of this project. Let us know if you can be of any assistance. Sincerely, / tww d�— Virginia Dodson Assistant Planner enclosure lily: TCC -3 -0i LOCATED AT: 18880 SW Meirtinaz $ Avenue 94 •J. Comments on City ( Tigard CPA -0004 /CON 90--0( , Bingham /Speiker March 19, 1990 Page 2 The analysis, p. 4, first sentence, states the I -5 interchange does not function adequately under existing conditions, however, the tables on pages 7, 8, 9 and 10 indicate that the existing 1990 levels of service are all B and C. The tables for Existing and Industrial, Zoning also show levels of service at B and C, except for Lower Boones /McEwan Road at the a.m. peak hour. The tables for existing and Scenario 1 again show levels of service of B and C except for Lower Boones /72nd p.m. peak hour. The tables for existing and Scenario 2 show B and C service levels except for two cases. It appears the tables on pages 7 and 8 do not support the statement that the interchange does not function adequately under existing conditions. We thank the applicant for having prepared the traffic analysis and we thank the City of Tigard for requesting our comments. We agree with the traffic analysis that the north Tualatin interchange and surrounding areas is a regional problem. The City of Tualatin strongly supports freeway and interchange improvements and understands that the City of Tigard does also. Should the requested land use changes be approved, we would encourage the City of Tigard to actively support future freeway. and interchange improvement projects. Should you have any questions, please call me at 692 -2000. Cordially, James F. Jacks, AICP Planning Director jb c 4 City Manager City Engineer Assistant to City Manager - Economic Development CITY OF TUALATIN 18880 SW MARTINAZZI AVE. PO BOX 388 TUALATIN, OREGON 97062 -0369 (503) 692 -2000 HAELQ..LLI —Fay E 'D March 19, 1990 Mr. Jerry Offer Tigard Planning Department P.O. Box 3397 Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Jerry: RE: CITY OF TIGARD CPA 90-0004/CON 90-0002, BINCHAM /SPIEKER • Thank you for requesting comments from the City of Tualatin regarding the proposed comprehensive plan amendment and zone change from light industrial to general commercial for property at 72nd Avenue and Interstate 5 (2S1 13AD, 1700). We have reviewed the proposed change from light industrial to general commercial for about 6.6 acres for a hotel and general commercial uses. Our comments address the traffic analysis prepared by Mackenzie Engineering Inc. T.' analysis, p. 2, paragraph 3, last sentence, refers to an ODOT project this summer to add or restripe lanes at the north Tualatin interchange. We suggest you verify with ODOT that such a project exists because we are aware only of a project that has just started for I-°5 from 1 -205 north to Carman Drive. It does not include additional turn lanes at the north Tualatin interchange. We contacted Tom Schwab at ODOT and he was not aware of a north Tualatin interchange turn lane project this summer. The analysis, p. 2, paragraph 5, refers to the future extension of Durham Road and that no definitive schedule or design is currently available. Washington County includes the Durham Road project as an MSTIP project with construction starting spring of 1992. We would recommend you contact Washington County because they have been talking about splitting out the very east portion from the stub street in the PacTrust Development to 72nd as a separate project that might be completed sooner. The analysis, p. 3, retail Scenario 1, includes an assumption from the LTILMAnjal, that 43.5% of the pass -by trips will be diverted to the subject property. Although the 43.5% figure is from the Manual, it would appear that the function of 72nd Avenue and therefore the type of trips it carries would not result in 43.5% diverted onto the subject property. It appears the applicant should provide additional justification to support the 43.5% figure. This comment would hold for Scenario 2 also, REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO: t,I 4 r, .1202EVAILLO DATE: October 19 1993 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 93 -0017 BINGHAM /MEGA FOODS LOCATION: 16700 SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 261 13AD, tax lot 1700). A request 2or Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 68,000 square foot grocery store. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62.050, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, and 18.164. ZONE: C-G (General Commercial) The C--G zoning designation allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support Services, general retail sales, and eating and drinking establishments among other uses. RECEIVED PIJOIMING or, 2'1 1993 Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Oct. 29, 1993. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable tc respond by the above date please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 S'1 Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: G39 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ;ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact .._w._._..� Please refer to the enclosed letter. of our office. Written Comments: )'t,k tiV ; -, .0 _�_ . ) f., . f ,�: °�, 1 X11 '� n a, � ... �' �. c ;N. . ,i'tk.t:':___.,,L.,_' . 47 a 'X' (-',. .','., 4 . 1.1L2L—iLLA(114, C 1 e ILL....-LYt . ':.I.S.61--...121L-4.0114441-roL i Name oi' Person Commenting: -, fl (t Hi L) r A NT: Lm:-1 ____________ Phone Number: °Z 'T • ., �i Iv OCT 19 WATER QUALITY DIVISION a • • ¢_..,, REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO: t""l° ,,�JAa _ _ __ __, DATE: October 19 1993 ._ FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SXTE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 93 -0017 BIN3H2N /MEGA FOODS LOCATION: 16700 SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 261 13AD, tax lot 1700). A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 68,000 square foot grocery store. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62.050, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, and 18.164. ZONE: C-G (General Commercial) The C -G zoning designation allows public agency and administrative services, public support faoilitiea, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, and eating and drinking establishments among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information Supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the neat future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Oct. 1993. You may 1,113e the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you aze unable en nd by the above dais, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact Please refer to the enclosed letter. of our office. X Written Comments: ..! " �..�....�.k� r"d c., i t t F .. t i 1 1 �-� ' t (�` Y"� I C�- i t,. ly 1, C.c.,,, F., t Rt. slij IUD- , u . _� • t� -�► ►".... ..L . i't,�.... f `4 1.+EA. 6 t r+ t .i J Cu E+ 1. C✓ o I tO D�� lL Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: .. 4=. 71,1,,, :Q.,2 (-Re_ I t-- 6/512 5 ti - r - -- . ^4 K t F71 trtz r ~ T sa y °RS 9.1L.LIQ:1_,_312. 1/ t.,04pisTio4,,,) e,;(1 6-16,0S lecto-L-L- a 63, m, Per),D y „ft:- 1 t r , A / 6 top - C, t - t - d t4 Y P, Ph h) fir. o: r n S TO: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS Li.k4kicall'06 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RECEIVED PANNING 00'2 7 1993 DATE: October 19 1993 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 93 -0017 BINGH /MEGA FOODS LOCATION: 16700 SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 2S1 13AD, tax lot 1700). A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 68,000 square foot grocery store. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62.050, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, and 18.164. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zoning designation allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, and eating and drinking establishments among other uses. Attached is. the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information zupplied by 7av4 ous departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Oct. 294 1994. You may use the apace provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. j you are unable to res2ond by the above date., please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as noon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oft 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andres. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: Xx.XX We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Immulaarsrer Namo of Person Commenting.: G. SCOTT PALMER Phone Number: 226 -4211 EXT , 2449 TO: FROM: Tigard Planning Department REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: October 19 1993 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDk 93 -0017 EINGHAMLQA FOODS LOCATION: 16700 SW 72nd, Avenue (WCTM 2S1 13AD, tax lot 1700). A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 68,000 square foot grocery store. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62.050, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, and 18.164. ZONE: C-G (General Commercial) The C-G zoning designation allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, and eating and drinking establishments among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicants statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by pct. 29, 1993. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. 7ou are unable to respond by the above dater please phone the staff contact noted below with your comment(, and - confirm your coMinents in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: raryferiimi 4 .. TO: 4 L 1 Q FROM: Tigard Planning Department REQUEST FOR COMMENTS Jcovvo RECEIVED PLANNING 00T 2 2 1993 DATE: October 19 1993 ■•,**,_ RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 93-0017 BINGHAM /MEGA FOODS LOCATION: 16700 SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 281 13AD, tax lot 1700). A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 68,000 square foot grocery store. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62.050, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, and 18.164. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zoning designation allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, and eating and drinking establishments among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's staterr -,it for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will b rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Oct. 29, 1993. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If You are unable to remoo by the above date please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639- 4171. STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: .. . ±r -e k 4'1 t # .. 4 AAA , Narrie of Person Commenting: Phone Nunnber : CO f 0 G'0 • /P /p1 • 4...0./.4 Cam! ( coy\ -2,.43/) b 1 ' n• REQUEST FOR COMMENTS RECEIVED PLANNING fCT 2 2 1993 TO: ,EllAikkgiZCa2(212.1ELALHL DATE: October 15 1993_"„ FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 93-0017 BINGHAMLPECA FOODS LOCATION: 16700 SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 281 13AD, tax lot 1700). A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 68,000 square foot grocery store. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62.050, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, and 18.164. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zoning designation allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, and eating and drinking establishments among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicantis statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your continents by Oct. 29, 1993. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your oosramenta. Lf you are unable to respond bv„the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing ad soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 - 4171. STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: �� We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Name of keeraon Commenting:, ?hone Number: 7 - k a„r7 �yJ au a 4I •1 RECEIVED PLANNING \,\) OCT 2 2 1 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO: 11:LeiSeALYX � . DATE: October 19j 1993 FROM. Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 93 -0017 BINGHm MEGA FOODS LOCATION: 16700 SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 281 13AD, tax lot 1700). A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 68,000 square foot grocery store. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62.050, 1'.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, and 18.164. ZONE: C-G (General Commercial) The C-G zoning designation allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, and eating and drinking establishments among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Oct. 29, 1993. You may use the space provided below or attach, a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable tia respond by t.aye above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd „, Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: of our office. g nom, ..3d J? '' .J11.1 ' .tA t: ! a) »'Zeta, 6. • .._..�._......_______._, Name of person Commenting: ��- Phone Number :40 • • "4 . ; nto TO: FROM: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 4 CO 54( Tigard Planning Department DATE: _October 19 1993 RECEIVED PLANNING OCT 2 1 1993 RE: 8/TE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 93-0017 B1NaIABLg1FOODS LOCATION: 16700 SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 281 13AD, tax lot 1700). A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 68,000 square foot grocery store. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Coda Chapters 18.62.050, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, and 18.164. ZONE: C-G (General ComMercial) The C-G zoning designation allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, and eating and drinking establishments among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan, and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Oct. 29, 1993. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. urjabl(Lbo reqppnd by the above date please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comment8 in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 972234 PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea PLEASE CHECK TEE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact Please refer to the enclosed letter. Witten Comments: of out office. Name of Person Commenting: 1//4"4P,Lgjedebtiget..6t.LAtfa4fs,i5dtip.,-,1r Phone klurtther: 1.06g-1664 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO: u' -�,- ' DATE: October 19 1993 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 93-0017 BINGHAM /MEGA FOODS LOCATION: 16700 SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 281 13AD, tax lot 1700). A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 68,000 equare foot grocery store. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62.050, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, and 18.164. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zoning designation allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support serveees, general retail sales, and eating and drinking establishments among other uses. Attached i j the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your Comments by Oct. 29, 1993. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date., please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223.. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Name of person Commenting: Phone Number: [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] SDR 93-17 2 oil 43 rAiNTEp nog 4,TEE1- GRIP 1,41/ 01061.44E PREF114161-1EP METAL COPING PM1311■1161-1E1:" METAL PosIOCIA II I II I loon 1111111111111111111111 1 1101 111111 11111111 1.1 Jill I 111 11' ;cartzolt 6copitso otAtip tge.74 oru. -$011,11" MOE 'Cl1415044 1.1111111161111M11101•41011111,1010.111111.11111 SOUTH ELEVATION eTARDARD 10.4CE C41A PLAATER6 aims coLutio ..............................,sm . - ....-.... —. . . . --Wr.........,................----, Vionopameumiemismansammommommmow , i . ------ .C.' 0 .............................„_,..,,,,,..,,,,„...,....„„,....,,,,...r..---,:--.,. — —,-"-"--"7:-:"\–,.. ■-... .-- 1.... .... ..... .... .... 1.... Im.... mg. .I ....0 ..... rm.. was J. .......... as/ Ma. ..... ..ir..I........ --— ,.....,. ........ ...........1 sm. *Ss mas Mar. 1 .... .... ...Orii/lir.10/......................... ■ ...........s....... . 1 I ^ . . ,asmsMgsssssma.... W.............M..*.* ,..... hm., , ' 1 ............ s....rym*,,n.a........ * W ......................ro . . ....r...b.”0.....,....m, ' . . ....1.....■•■••••...., e.•T.I.....',..',..r....... . . .. . . .....MT.,...... , • irl . . . ,......... .....s....M...... . ..-- / S .. , i, , / , ....".".."................."--'—........1.................... / \ \./ \ / . ....... .—...... .............. , ,...\1 . NORTH ELEVATION SAMISOMMII as. or 4....■■••■■■•••■•••••■■■■■••■•••■•• • ea* ...• 1.... • I, Ms sm. a... saw sm. pm.. ma. sm. sm. sm. ma. sm. ma. gas. ....rt Ass * Ma. 1111111H11 L.. . ... 1 1 — 112,7-7-7-17_7- EAST ELEVATION .6.4 .0.. ....0......k .... — — WEST ELEVATiON 4*. _ _ 1E' THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL 00CUMENT. - • ,, n • fy y.y y 1-1"FrI3 11111 1111 1111 II] 4 6 64 1111111111111), 4 I 11 ' I 11, ' 12 Nc1,36 e 1111 Jill till liii 0-11;11014111ij 91.01 gi t woo • ' 9 -' I 10 611 ma. was sm.. sm. mas rt 5ept014,6a n9q 09/22/93 SDR 93-17 3 OP 43 0 HYDT PP GAS 7- RIM 173.89 )I 162.54 MIIII.011106,11PONNIMOOKORN. 410111=111.M11101.1.10.....121.1, ASPHALT oPP Opp 011.11.111.1111.11.1111MINIM WWII PARKIN0 889 10100" E 614.55' PP PP Q 2" BACKFLOW DEVICE pp ,Af4 G G G • ow. IWO Wm* woo DS 30' ST.MH RIM 175.9D IF 170.3P (COI AS -nil) CR RIM 175.15 IE 172.30 68,240 S.F. 01 16" x It WET TA • AND 8" GATE VA VE I I z 24 BIKE R CK SPACES COVERED WALK El 1111 1111111111111111111111111h.... 8" CLASS 52 D.I. PIPE a." OM. 41.6.0MMIIIIKIMNI MUM MY. SINOMMINO.asum OS. 1.1.1111.10.1.01.1.111.111111111.1 110.0 .11011.0.111.1...1011 WM MO 4.....suaffileINIM WOR 115.0 4.1111.114.9.1.11". 4$' .1. N.. Cr) 0 WAN I 13 S89°37'00" W 234.8V PP IF THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGISLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. PP 0 17 -P 11- rtft " 111 ty-FTTri 1 I 6 11111 1111 III 111111111 Miz 8 III, liii 1111 III III 11111 ri 111111111 0 61d1H1AM 1 III 1111 11114 1111111 11114 i111111111111;111111TITTII.j(il 1111111111111111111111111111121 11i 121 No.38 e 11111 figa 111111111 11111111i .111114 III14 L111111111 9111111111 111111,11 111111111 lilt liii 111111111 oivint HAI! 0 LP • 16.812 GRAPHIC SCALE 16 LEGEND 60 120 —111111111111111MEgalffia mom ( ) 1 inch 30 ft. 0 DOWNSPOUT CATCH BASIN MANHOLE ED POLLUTION CONTROL DRYWELL STORMLINE MU .10. 0.1111•11•11.3iWRIS WATER LINE ----- SANITARY SEWER CLEAN OUT 0 VALVE b FIRE HYDRANT MECHANICAL JOINT 10 THRUST BLOCK N z Ld 0 00) (D LLI >0 LAJ M 0 KY) 0 z P CO ,,,oPROP4t.8 r‘ 4freA s a 110605 4" 'tiff 1111rAt G. DATE: AUGUST 1993 DRAWN BY; MAP \SAS REVISION EDITION CLOSING DATE: in MACKENZIE ENGINEERING IN 1993, ALL. RIGHTS RESERVED 'THESE DRAWOIG ARE THE PROpERTY Of MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INc. cm.E.1„) AND ARE NOT TO BE USED OR REPO- OUcED IN ANY MANNER, EXCEPT VATti 111K PRIV' WRITTEN PERMISSION Or MIX SHEET SD3 or JOB NO 293037 AS SUBMITTED FOR DESIGN REVIEW 9/23/93 5t-lot6ku-,t, -214, [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] a . • • 41 * - r, ea • ■/` 5 .5 /1 ■ 4 D RPH . IC SCAU ASPHAT PARKitiO 0PP SB9'10,00" E 614.55' .a.rain-vaa•warnahrata,mpaaa, PP 0-4 RIM 173,e9 )IE 16244 SDR 93-11 5 OP 45 ST,MI1 RIM i79 IE 110,0 (COT 4—St.M.,1) — aarara,, MN 175.15 /E 172Q CS 0 W/MH 0C.T.S. 0 0 PP S8937'00°W 234.81' LANDSCAPE CQNCEPT PLAN IF THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. PP 0 c§1 C.; • PLANT LEGEND TREES f(2NIZEB(20:MattlaUS(I.4.L B&B) PSEUDOTSUGA MENZESII - DOUGLAS FIR — smarms_ naliz.L.QALLBAD ACER RUI3RUM 'RED SUNSET' - RED SUNSET MAPLE n-ritrrpliptillf(riptittri III!! Tilt wilily' ilifi)ifrpTIrrintp-riprin io o1: t37 414 iffi jjjj 111111111 i11111111 f111 111r1 1111111M? t I Lit I Olt 11 It Sit 171 Jill1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 .1.11111)11111111111(1.111Z111411111111 1)' 11111111 0000 EL $274T15"w 1 NETEEM PYRUS CALLERYANA 'CAPITAL' - CAPITAL PEAR A, . ZSIESA„,13_02 ZELKOVA SERRATA 'GREEN VASE' - GREEN VASE ZELKOVA SHRUBS I GROUNDCOVERS ELE12CaElarrit. -AM PRUNUS LAUROCERASUS 'OTTO LUYKEN' Otto LUYKEN LAUJEL .SIBWILA=LE1AtttltLaI2C4k,:_Lr12,CJ EUONYMUS ALATA 'COMPACTA' WINGED EUONYMUS maypc7,0veR PlAivrzig a BYPERICUM CALYCINUM - ST. JOHN'S 'WORT • MUD ACCUrrafiMailatik,...-M11) MAHONIA AQUIFOLIUM 'COMPACTA' COMPACT OREGON GRAPE kriMIWILELAMIYatia.41144112.CIA CORNUS S. '1gELSEYI' - KELSEY'S REDTWIG DOGWOOD 112W-i=210114.11.1411110. GALt -1112,121* BERBERIS T 'CRIMSON PYGIVIYi - CRIMSON PYGMY BARBERRY ippi1 ig11111 1 11 ' I 12 No.35 51 UMMII V W 3 bttis 111111111111111111111111111,11111i411 ( PT 1 inch ws 30 ft, MIKE FAIIA AND AS OMIT LAADASe_m_kag_611 800 NW SIXTH AVE. SUITE 327 PORTLAND, OR. 97209 503 /222-5612 AS SUBMITTED FOR. DESIGN REVIEW 9/23/93 5tpot4so. .2q, mci 11 a 11 4 ••■ •• • e 4 • I • 1 • • t i lop cr 1/40 0 1. ' te) 30' co I ( , b .174.8 0 1 • • 41 , . tr) 0 0 , \O) 4,q) 44, (D172.39 RRS Tam 4$' lfraxasa, t•t‘ 0173.45 173,87 * ••••.,•• .•• POSSIBLE R.O.W, DEDICATION 173,75 17 176.95 ti /6,6;1 • 1 ION Uniinilil *1 1 1 ils1...191 itti nonunsin u h. 0' 4.8N. 4 IAN"? ASPHALT ..""" • • • • '•• A • • • • • ,,,Ab gu- X,. • • 173.50 0 PARKIN° 17.5 • S8'10'00"E 614.55' 172.71 0 •■•-.-r•-••••., „ t72.17 172.25 * fi • ,1q) 45' 11 (1) SOR 93-17 G OF 43 , • • 4, NYkis 4.> ev 'N • „?) . A 0 -a 20' • 4') 13 • A) 80.95 • 24' 12 12 ■ A 2 In 2,74 • 183.10 * 179.75 4) • 173,75" • skk;tstaasseorpruosus••oa*uLtrssar4r....,R-Awaoramncxar,.:taa..-.., 174.26 • 174,5 • 175,9B 24 BIKEe ACK ,PACES' ---1k,35 182.85 * 1 I 1' 4.05 0 6.5 29 • 1111r- 29 350' 174.45 • VININNIN.010...F.010•MOVIR • 68,240 S.F. • 174,35 0 COVERED WALK 24' 182,85 182.45 4 ./5 183,65 • 184.75 • 13 •■• 187.: 1 0 O ,„'f) Nq)'. S89'37'OO"W 234.81' 182,75 23 • e 187.85 • 25 .95 07-8611r- 0 184.45 * ---,004,040,100.ircw• IF THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OP' THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. • 17111T111 II I 1 1 11-1111 tj 1 24' om 00 181.6 • 1.27 1 81 .7 r 1,95 ki4 21 24' 0178.8'2 • Ell! 182.11 13 18 0 23 pr rrr 186,25 0182.95 11.95 0 rrr 18.75 012.25 :14 r r 2. :I 179. 24' 0168' 180.45 * A. 180.85 Cj 1.> r pr 181.55 A r r rr -rs"* .181.85 *182.85 1181.15 174.25 0 174.65 • 17.62 4)* C"41. „„, \ix 17.04 0 172,05 p W.:r•r•Vs. -.„. .4Xaa, • JO 1.1% , r‘ra. 40' (!) 17.03 17 LOADING -41 COVERED 9 ;,•••••••,,,,t, G TRUCK WELL • 179.8 r 180.85 *180.45 •"-- •179,35 0184.45 170,76 • • LO S27'4011 5" vv 1.81, 15 GRAPHIC SCALE 60 120 ill' 0011111111111111111... LEGEND ( FEET ) Inala 30 tt., TREE PROTECTION AREAS (FIELD VERIFICATION BY ARBORIST) SITE ANALYSIS TOTAL SITE AREA: TOTAL BULDING AREA: LANDSCAPE: Required: Provided: PARKING: Required: Provided: Standard: Compact: Handicap: Total: 298,319 SQ. FT, 68,240 SQ. FT. 44,748 SQ. FT. (150%) 49,216 SQ. FT. (16.5%) 341 (5 per 1000 GSF) 5 1.4% 280 79.1% 69 19.5% 354 (5.2 per 1000 GSF) AS SUBMITTED FOR DESIGN REVIEW 9/23/93 DATE: AUGUST 1993 DRAWN BY: M AP \SAS CHECKED BY: DOL REVISION EDITION =SING DATE: /h MANENZIE ENGINEERING INC. 1993, AU. RIGHTS RESERVED THESE DRAWING ARE THE PROPERTY OF MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INC. (M,E.1.) AND ARE NOT TO BE USED Of REPRO- DUCED IN ANY1.4ANNER, EXCEPT YAM THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF M.E.I. SHEET OF JOB NO. 293037 liiti r1111111 111111ri 111111111 r11111; f1111; 111111ii 111111111‘,T-7:11 1T-1111i -11 frriri lJlflJl)!II,, i111111111r1i111111(11.filillirr111111fif11111111f111111rifliil rifi I III UII 1 J 1 ill No,86 I 11111r 11frP11111111 11 1111i1111(11111inf1111 1111111111111111111111f1iltilll 11114 i[111111r, 1 111111111 • " • 5pt014,60 .214, 09c/ • 1 • tr. • • sis • • IPA • ; 4 09/22/93 (IN DUHM I SDR 93-17 7 OF 43 ....,......,,..„A , sptiu.„. D RIM 17.80 )1E 162.54 0 HYOT PP GAS ) 172.N RR$ Tem •,>.cp J 0173.45 b4- „AN* • oPP 173.87 oPP ASPHALT PARKING G N4' 9 173.50 0 PP ,-A.,,.nvovrr,rmasoe..000mv,o,a...r*r+.,,,,wrrrn,ovmoro.-t.....t.mrm,.., • 2 .3133..“ .33033. 472.71 17. 3.:,13_ ,5 tomasr.“. G S89I 1 0009 E 6'1 4,55' n,„,,..„...„„„,„„,,,,w„,„„m,„,„„„,..„„:„„„„„„....„,,,,,,,,3880.03.3333,00a80■030,130000•8331313308,0m,3183 03033,333.0,31,3803.003.3,803.37.0,383.3003300033333,3303331.831 x —÷ArA (1,‘ X 4" F X ( 30' ST.MH RIM 175.99 IE 170,30 (00T AS ,-.81..111,,T) a RIM 175.14 1E 172,30 013 0 174,8 • 224 tit ›■. 2,7" r: t /5,55 X 24" F 'XX X to 0 ‘LI F 14" FXXXr1 \L4qL r 187410"Fl eXP F°:>?Xl X)(6)13KF err • Xi.e1\40r 204 LiJ + 430 r„,-11:rx AX 1 41!' F 172.17 IT/ PP 0 172.25 • 04.‘ 000"33703,0.03030330,033,000._ N?po *334 31.3.34033:. /2.04 PP C4-1 172, 5 GG ‘33.0,03.033.0333.030.3800.-33.8,0330,34310.18300**03,303830033303.0303333*-33 G G 37,-.303.300.30 *<• 4 (\t. A Ck 1 A )(KO- xco tk o!,( ,\14,79,0‘.0$, xAF4 OOR ke\ 0 A # X x 174.25 X x \IN's) NC\ 7"F X \1%Sek ffr /4, es x 8" 32»F z PX\4 <4, 1'4 4C)X F A X 24F. Zo - _ g.5495' X 18. F \ F N.4 01,4, ce? \ X 'X v x US- ,tA A. X 73,75 7744 pt xi x, 4 .."\'' )(;) + ") ev, ),Ickc 4 ..).1$4, 6 X 25 F . 179.00 © MAff,DOOF,s, x _ A-0 ,.3,7112.**F.) 18" X e'V '4bG\ 174.4$ )111,13:r :Y.11FA8"67":1:1*F )1204(44/ 12" 26" F nt. A 2*F EA >5`;!:\ 4 )L 22" F X 20" F < 21"f, xr, l• 49r) 1\ AS "ii>"(N 13" F 4/.) (04: J. iy in • ' lb»F r 4 14" • 1014:, F '40 A.A 4).4s 174.35 X <. ")› lIttOt X ,14A FrILNI4Plowy\C6) 4 17 o's 2 x 6' <\. Cs y/kx,": '"sr)' '.% ‚4'..' 173.82 • pcee \Alec ,31,A X vt, NO x;ko, HiP11111 " F X 40- S".\<44 JeA t,V) \°Xci't Rh' 4-10"AL X X 13" F ▪ 24 BIKE,QRACK\Mtv 4 26"F • COVEIED' 26 F Nro 221" F x`'o5TACES'‘ \-44, 0. NtIP ter Xel 13";:41:15:%''‘ 12j ?6(0 tlitC X kIX "644 le X \ t X CO 4' P A \ X X 1 e F >krntsk X‘1 62.110"F X 177.42 X 15" &c,:k ‘e( "V<4 x it 9 \ N • gilt.' 22" F X 15"FIX 12"F .17- q"A 10 A A v„0 OKI , 0 2 " ,k 181.6,5 11" T '72 3-61)W >e 20"F X37\% (.1, AelNig „ X5E14 4 of( DR`WY 45' N0O *O8' 13 ,k 44 X 6) 1„) 7. )1j;'. X Nos -467. fi 40' s°. 1,4 4 e4i As '1' / 4Q X / e ii-i Nib 7 * . 4, 1 ,s.,• t" i)(4 0 22"E 'X WV' 180.45 X A 911. 0 LP tf,') • 177.96 N • '1116"F 179.8 Pr ik\ 201 ti • 1. " ,f •••'' 4' r 6);k 1 7/ 4 45 ) k‘5 41* 0 0 -0 0 —1 2.5 4"F X 1(93 8 X 12"r X 27" F A<> 23 29 18445 X 10" F 120 , • 4 ,•• . . . • A l'r "fp> 0 W/MH '47X .kt.'•/'' dp 6.5 4" F tx: )1( ,\4» let 84 X 12' F 184.75 X 22" F 111. ,• t„, • C) qr. It0',0 fi 8 9, OMO Mc 6, 000 .33•A r--A4 4b-• S89137'00" W 234.8 (1) +It\ M b4 A 4 87.85 hX,' (1, ■41, 0,4lb A, 24" F 36„F 187, 1,P, )4'1:P11F, 14'1 ....4.41.1.1110Noires..Notosio.610,11.11101411410MINNIONMINIONI,..114.1alimonmeIMInslia....■ •;. IV THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OV THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT, ..\`2 7Fr 111111111111111111111g11111111111110 ,k. 184.45 * 9484.45 et 186.25 ' • 0165./5 .0182,95 „ 111 181,95 170,75 172.70 175.04 111 1 11111 ipirrrrr plTrrtri pin 1111111111 14 ' ' 11111111 111111& 111111111 1111111111 f111111I1 1111g 11111.11r[11111f1 1111111141 11111A1111111 I f 1,, ,11.11 ,111,11,. 1111111111111A 175,67 fliiiittg, i-:1-718 177.86 175.03 1111111fiiiiiiii,11111111111 N0,36 ii11111.11 t1111111■1%111111 1111111111'1111t1"1 11111111&1111 1311111111 9 111111111 111111111 E1111111,11 177.26 (.0 174.43 S2740' GRAPHIC SCALE LEGEND 8,33.800 ( IN FEET ) 1. inch 0 ft, * EXISTING CONTOUR 7 PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED CATCH BASIN (!) POLLUTION CONTROL MANHOLE DRYWELL SPOT FINISH GRADE TREE PROTECTION AREA 000.00 11 INCORPORATED 0— 0 AS SUBM TIED FOR DESIGN REVIEW 9/23/93 5Pte714,150 .21.1/ eq9q DATE: AUGUST 1993 DRAWN BY: MAP \SA'S CHECKED BY: DGL REVISION EDITION CLOSING DATE: E" MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INC, 193, ALL RIGHTS RESERVE-0 THESE DRANO ARE 11.IE PROEIERTY OF MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INC, (ME.) AND ARE NOT TO BE USED 0I't REPRO.. DUCE° IN ANY MANNER. EXCEPT WITH THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF MEI SHEET SD2 OF JOB NO, 293037 SDR 93-17 8 OF 43 • R. 17;!.8,1 li 162,t,4 M11 RIM IF ):'. (CO ‘5—E1 RIM 175,15 IE 12.& Es, :30' WM- c;iv rn 0 041.4210.411PONONO*11. ••• igloo Op p 6,A 44.101411.4001.0mmeLow.olita.,4111166...0 me .1144.10411144114■19.1NIMOIRIM04114111.11/11./ *MY 1.1•61 X 04 ';1? 22” F X 22" F 24"F xX , 0C 4 xy) 167 .X ■4444.1.4.14.404 Immo* .111.11111111111111111muloi ailiiill11111111 11111111111111111011111. tos • X 141' 0<< X NI, 0C r X 16"F 0C x •( \ 4' X 'F X .14 16" X 14" FXXX <0 18'1F X ca..x XNN X#Ne)(< 18 >I 16" F X I A c' :4 X ,1<( X ‘< X ‘5\,(S'' k`P 6"F X t1T)'t ft.3' by A I Nr.-1, X11 „ M X b” tvl N, ,‘■ X(5,, A\ I X 18" F '1'24'F L LJ I Lii n zI Zr THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE; TO TAD.; QUALITY OF THE 014IGINAL DOCUMENT „ • „ • 40101 Int saw Immo x .1,0"F X X 1 b" (9, 22" F X 4.,e) x x- x X 247 18" Xx 41,6 20" Fi 6>x>< „c X x x X 15" F X , 7" F X 0) 1 8" F X f X 13"F ca, LP OW X X y ) 15"F X ^ X N xNt" X X 24" F X X X N 141g: Xi X X1'7 X 20" F o X X 1 X 22"F X' X 6" X 24"1 XN 14"F X 0C X „Al 4° X 3 ..10Al. X 7F F X X X/k • x4) X X 24"F I „ ,r e, X ••••A•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.••*,mr.A.,rr-,,w.r.r. x- I•40 ......,,,,,,,,•,••••■•••••••••••••••••.•• ,(A < X 24" 12" 16" F x X 32"F X 21"F X 12 121 41- 13"F xX X x „.4 444.4w. 1 9" M x x X es, X X r ' X 14 F ' II 1 r. X 109AL X 2.0"F 4 AN X 24" F 2e F X 20" F 91112F X 15" F X It 10" F X 15'F X X 22"P **< 139F X X 2F i,C ,„(() x 2(.1"F 12"r '- 14'r • 4" 1 X ;S- // f ....41..,01.40s.alliamil.momkalrimo.mammamibleganinwriosuloolim t-iII • X4, 5F X 181F 7” r x fi• X 18" X 28 X Nis` ,,FS X 18" -f ar xinxIT'" xx2Ne: I pt. (1), X X Xq't4n::541 X „; 1,) ', X \",' A X X Ng) e X 1 4" , X' x 114 o e( 4`, X <1/ , ec. /'" X .b 1 F X xX x'\ X Ix X A 0\-p X 14F X 121F x X 24" r X (9, Xq'c° X/\ X 111/4 xca X xrye x 1 4. >:\ X 15F 'Po, "i'• (0 rp X 20" F , X 22"F x „o, X' X 13"F X x 10"M X X C===,0 X 5" DW X 04 X 6" —8"M X 6,. 14, N 41, 6' 0 PP • x fi F X 22"F X 10" M X (1, 4.0. onmlw rrp Ilip11111TrITHItritirprittri4TrtriiiiisgriTiipirt Xv"c'6 — X!41 r414004...mt b M 1 IF x IU X • x ■•••, X X 28"F X 12"1 .) X 22" F x ,,44,0144.1,C V' • Me X X 0C E1/4t"' 221 x 16" X 2, '1 X i" 0 X 10"F X • Neb X X 4"1 ")" r 47, ••••••••••••,•••A•••,•••••.••••,••,•A',.••r•A••••.•.••••,•••••,•,•A••••••••••••••.•.•••••••••••••'., MIN .10.0116.000.M.S■141.0,..0.016.4,11001414.1.4., MONNal. r............. 4•1•40 OW. .41•O OM. 41.410 41441a* MOM MN) ) I. r /,, 1C 1 ."F X ''4' (I. F X r I ,:i Xx N / 'A X ■ C , C Nr1' X 0 C I 7" F X co N 4 6 4 229F X x / 114"F X 0C / 167 X • 12"F I X 12"F I 18F X X X 12" F - 11 x 22r 24"F X If, 18' / / ./ I 0/9 1t 18" PP 6It I 91 , it. M t 1111 11111q1 III Ilk 111111111111111111111111111111111I ml f111141111111-111 tilt I 1 1 41 ) 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 X X 12"E X 1. X 2 (1‘111111111311111alt No 36 et ' le I lz III 1 1111 Ill 1111 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111 r< 18" GRAPHIC SCALE L„.. G 1.1,00 oval aa. 4.4,1,11 *Nal my.. ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 30 It. 120 IIINGSSIIMOSIMSMICANINIAMMILAMPOIli•WAININI TREE PROTECTION AREAS (FIELD VERIFICATION BY ARBORIST) 5tptat,ta .2141 tc19q Sent by MSA/MEI 503 228 1285 04/08/96 2:29PM ,....smmom,mommowmmurmmdommmowmmlmommmowewmpO MACKENZI/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.C. Architecture • Planning • Interior Design 303/224-9570 e FAX 503/228-1285 mAciaNnE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Civil • Structural • Tra.nsportation 503/224-9560 * FAX 503/2234285 0690 SrW. Bancroft Street P.O. Box 69039 Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 FAX COVER sum *tax 4LuiaLnareseimmAmm.,......4.44...............1.6wa..4.1A444&10.6Amomem.. Project Company:_ Attention: Job 782 Page 1/2 d11111111■111.11113101•1110MOMIRPrr.". FAM)(07 • Q Project Description:to t2oC*: A 1Z; Comments or Special Instruction:_ YAIONVIAIMMUNIMMIkingemen, Imemosmoomealoollialt cc by FAX to: arcusalmaml.111.1.14.1111MIIIIIINIIM Total Number of Paes (including this cover sheet): if you did not receive all pages, please call our RecordsDepartment, ORIGINAL WILL JVVILL NOT FOLLOW BY MAIL, CQW1pErfnaldfre NOT The irdorrnatitin conling4 k iblif iam% imirornimacin ad 0411 and frlitglOed Pr14 birtho L inclividuel or et taii 414(n9d •t041,. NI* render °Mks !rower 8 not the intendod recipient, this serves ps edification that tafly dri dladosure copyingb alistributIon‘ or the taking Of al action In reliance ,oitt Ow contents of ihis cummoIcitkin Proghibtiod, if this trumenission 'SW recg**3'4 kl tliodiale/Y nOtifY u SO3/2244570 to sitanao for return Of the *Oahu,' facsimlie. !Memel Us6 00,1 Flie SerwIvr I FAX: ....weruAkwItAtiatosama: ..11.1111111111011110141117 AMA aziett IF THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. 41 4. X • « 4081100. IT 1 Tip T p TIT T T F I • I, WP Dopattotent Trol 111111111.11111, 111111 I. No.36 afa-------8-i-----iri."---1 .`9Z flE I EZ gt I TZ OZ I 61 81 LT I 91 I 91 PI CT ET It OT I 6 8 L I —1-il-T—ii---FirCF- FT"-i-Z-111 11111111 1111 1111 IIII 1111 1111 lilt 1111 1111 IIII 1111 1111 111111111 1111 1111 111111111 Illi 1111 11111111 1111,1111 Jill 1111 Illilliii Iliiiiiil iiilliil MI iiii lili illi iiil Ilii iin iiii Mini,' iiii IIII iiii MI iiiiiiiii Iiiiiiin Iiiliiiii iiiiiiiii iiiiiiiii Wiiiiil iitittill rs IF THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. 11-ITT-1-IT' 11 Sent by: MSA/MEI 503 228 1285 ww....k4'non..mmummrmtrs.uamauww. 04/08/96 2:30PM Jeffax Job 782 Page 2/2 G ma asm. q01144ausimasar /4/ 4"00#1,0111M11111011111MPINIMIIMIIIMIIMINIIiiikiliLly.+46, G 0 %WO NNW AllalletPA0111011111101.101111111,1,106 4 TIT 1 717----- 11111,11;111fir31;114 Z9Z ill 111 1111111 -ItZ 111 ifIZgt lie ffillnlii HI zmilmw1L1 Zg Hi III ffiliiri. iiiiiiii3, L9 'id. ,m,„„„,,,„„ 1 9.-VegITIsT 1 ,,,,,,„ ffi.„„ Hun, ,„ ,„ „,„„„,„,„„„„,„„ 61 8L9 ,„, 11,1 „„,„, „„ ' „„,„„ill 9PCZ III 11111111 11, 11,1„„ii„ mos tiiitiii • AA, • • 41" •r• , , IF THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION/ IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. 44 a - 4 „ 0,401V 4,0‘, * r74 • ' ,1; c. v: • • , 4 - 4 • ktP* ;n4 • , * 4 1 ; P tr, • ,‘ •,'+' • •■ IT? 't 114''*4411,'" Yt 11' j • , • • 0 PERMIT NO I • CITY OF TIGARD - TREE REMOVAL PERMIT A COPY OF THIS FORM MUST BE CLEARLY POSTED ON SITE OR IN THE POSSESSION OF THE PERSON REMOVING THE TREES DURING ALL TREE REMOVAL ACTIVITIES. 1 GENERAL INFORMATION PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO. % 51 ;4L # ". .14 • 11/041 61PWPA4 1■1:4* 4'4. • 1r • 44:0 ;14;', 4 - nn PROPERTY OWNER* ADDRESS :I?) CITY . APPLICANT* SIGNATURE *‘' PHONE - ADDRESS .41 31, CITY ZIP Ants.ir- irier SIGNATURE BUSINESS NAME * When the owner and applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record of or a lessee in possession of written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner with written 0 authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided or submit a written authorization with this application. • PHONE ZIP I • rtlIf 1 1 1Triirfrir. 1-- 441— 1 I 2. REASON(S) FOR TREE REMOVAL So 40.Noisurracioneetlitlimmornmromullimpoleuerfte40444emumotilqwarriiimnasaftwie 3. RELATED LAND USE APPROVAL CASE NUMBER (if applicable) 112_ . 2' '• • ,- . v--.,,..- 4. Please attach a photocopy of a tax map or site plan to the back of this form. A larger site plan - ' : :'':,:;;;',; may be submitted if necessary to adequately address proposed tree removal. The site plan, 4- ,... ,.. .,, ,, 4 , , t ,7, , * , , •- c.• :4 ,,, ' , , ' , , ' : 4 `' shall show: cop,t4 Sp 6 :. . : . ' '' ' ' , ' '. ' . ' * i . . • . ,,, 4. •• : , ''' icomrnon names) . . '..., , .-.-:. '..";,,,$4,9... -.„ . ,, ., 1) The location of the subject sit .'f''''''.-. 2) All proposed or existing structures 3) All easements, dedicaitons, streams, wetlands, etc. 4) All trees over six inches in caliper size, measured four feet above grade 5) B6SiC indentification of tree types I 411 ,+•••' 4 ; ' •• an 0 '""; • . , . „ , 'I r:jit -441,640111106,0104 • •• .11 II:11111111[11 1l1 6 , r 4 r 44 0 1 1 1- 4 111111/0000.0.01 10 11'11111111'1 1.1 No. 36 trterift10.4***40# -t6Z 8 Z Li 3 9 Z ..19 Z IP Z I eC ZZ I TZ I Og I fii*-1-t-1 TL I 1911191 ti CI I ZT I III i—"E ir6 it-37-4-4 1 9 ' 2 , fir C li"--"Ii:11;1 1111 1!11 1111 1111 IIII 1111 1111 till 1111 1111 1111 1111 IIII 11111111i IIII IIII 111111111 111111111 111111111 1111 111 111111111 111111111 111111111 1111 nil Hu Hit minim iiiiiiiii tin iiii illiiiiii nil million 'ilium sun nu im lin nil sinliiiffitu unto 4 5C1:#6714460 IF THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. 4 • 1, 1.* • Prn. • • ';;I'i.#4:il')Sta.. t,„,,,"• r f • 44, • 441,, 14, he r • A. • - gie S _./°1" Tree protection plan required 1/ Yes Arborist's Report Required: jZces lationormwomota No No 1.2003./NINWIONOMW1 Additional Comments and/or Conditions of A ..roval rammummoonsorgama.. THIS PERMIT EXPIRES ON ZO (re UNLESS A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION IS SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION OF THIS ' PERMIT APPROVAL. Approved by H:LOGINVOSTS\TREE.PAAT 1 Title 11111 TITITi 1111 Tri 1 44 le,L1 Date 1111FC._,..21 # 4 NO.38 —if 1111 1111 eg till 111111111 1 SZ 1111 Lg 1111 1111 t----t 1111 1111 1111 1111 1).5 1111 I 111111111 eg lilt gC 1111 111111111 I TZ 1111 05 1111 111111111, I 61 1111111,11,111111111 l 81 1 LI 111111111 I 91 1 111111111 ei 1111 'PI MI 1111 CI IIII III I gt IIII till It 1111 111111111 I 0/T. 1111 1111 61 111111111 81 HMI! 4 nil 1111 9 1111 '9 MI 1111 41, 1111 nil MI C 1111 1111 g 1111 IIII I 01111301 111111411 .214, 44 - ?'1°" IF THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. rzi-Tf 4'1' XL -. 7-r-ii I f i-firri. • • 'Ili. • 2 11:47 1996 FROM TO: 15032281265 MAR 12 '96 12:03 WILLIAM L OWEN and ASSOCIATES Tree and Landscape Consulting Services P.O. BOX 641, PORTLAND, OREGON 972W 503/2224007 ° • • • TO: Los Stout Mackenzie Engineering, Inc. 0690 SW Bancroft Street PO Box 69039 Portland, OR 97201-0039 PAGE; 2 P.2 DATE: March 12, 1996 RE: BinOtaintrigard Project Tree Preservation Plans FAX to: (503) 228-1285 FROM: W.L. Owen, B.S., M.A., CA A brief review of necessary steps we vvin follow in the subject project tree preseivaiion program follows: I) Psior to construction, 4' high orange plastic fencing on steel posts driven into the ground at approximately 8 intervals will be placed around the drip line of all tree marked for preservation. • 2) Prior to construction, W1.0 will meet with construction contractor and other necessary parties to review tree preservation steps to be taken as work progresses. 3) As excavation proceeds nearby trees which border closely on parkkis lot landlor building construction, WL0 will be present on4ite to deal with each peripheral root zone impact construction problem on an as need • basis. Therapies, aerification cut • 1 fill problems if ally and I • other similar root impact problem will be aft/dressed at the time of construction. S. 4) Necessary pruning, wind - sail reduction, 14zard reduction if any, and other tree work as needed will be prescraxi on site situation* as the construction proceeds with the trees that are heavily impacted but can remain. • 44. • INSPECTION. DIAGNOSIS AND EVALUATION OP TM& SHAM AND MAUD PLANTINGS. CONSULTATION wirm RESPECT TO RANTING. TRANSPLANTING. PRRSIWNTION, MANTUA= AND ARBOREAL PLANNING. COMPREHENSIVE LOSS OR DAMAGE R&M& DULY SANCTIONED APPRAISALS FOR LEGAL OR CoNTRACTUAL PURPOSES. LEGALLY ACCEPTABLIVITSTIMONY IN COURT CASES. • 4 111101 VISO MU* tOomiktO No, 36 9,0 ...0.0-4„, • 5tptellASER ri9'7 --ffil 8gThi------t 1111 1111 .1111 111111111 MP 1111 1111 1111 Illi 1111 1111 1111 1111 CZ 1111 1111 i4Z 1111 111111111 1 Tz 111111111 1 03 1111 • 61 1111 1111 St Jill 111111111 1 LI 111111111 1 91 111111111 I 21: 1111 ti 1111 1 IIIIIIIII CT iiii Zit iiii Hu TI iiii iiii ii lin ini nu 6 iiii mil 8 nil iiii 1411-9FTST-I–T7 Huhn' nilffin intinisinisni Him! TZ-1-"F1v Huhn' lintiiii 4,14 UV 0e, .40 0 IF THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. 12 11:47 1996 FROM: MAR 12 '96 12:03 Lis Stout Page 2 TO 15032281285 PAGE: 3 .P.3 5) Groupings of trees as shown on the plot plan for preservation will be lee undisturbed during the construction process. Individual tree problems and pruning deadwood removal, hazard =owl, etc4 will be dealt with over time so that at the conclusion of construction, the trees left r via be in state ofthe art condition in terms or azboriculture and safety. Follow up monitor* of trees during all of the construction process beginning to end as well as for a full growing season following construction is routine and matter-of-course for W1.0 on these projects. This insures raaidinum tree preservation because of the situational problem solving approach taken durks construction. 401 6) WW is on canto the contractor dining the construction to alieviate any unforseen problems •W*12 may develop. In summary, the process Welty recited above will result in maxbnng tree preservation and minimizing tree loss of trees left after construction. This process has proven to be the most efficacious arboriculturally as well as the most safe from hazard and risk of darmage to persons or property fioni trees failing post construction in my experience. The process outlined above in brief will be Mowed on the MO= Tigard, project. I await your instructions as to when you wish to proceed with the first meeting with your contractor regarding tree Ezncing. Please let me know ifyou have any questions. 141°71165 WL0 IC 1111 1111 • o; 1111i1111 SU 1111 fill Lig 1111 1111 9 1111 3 IIII .9Z 1111 1111 t3 IIII VIII CZ 1111 1111 ''Z' 1111 1111 1 TZ 1111 111111111 I 01ZT161i-------81: 111111111 1111.1111 111111111 I LI III1111111111111111 1 n I ei 1111 lii 1111 ilii CT 1111 iiii Zit ilii iili It !Hi iiiiiiiii I OT Jinni I 6 lin iminnii 8 L lin I I nil 91 Him 1-1; 21' Jill lin nu 1 I tom Ilii-lTr' 11 im int iiit iiii Hu litittli /1 IF THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. • .11.11011•••.••••••"*“.....• • State of Oregon Department of Forestry / Department of Revenue' Notification Number: 96-531-20589 Attached is the processed information from the Notification of Operation and/or Application for Permits. Please review this information and retain for future reference, LX] - Notice is given to the State Forester that an operation will be conducted on the lands described herein (ORS 527.670). E 1 A Permit to Operate Power Driven Machinery is issued for the lands described herein (ORS 477,625). EXPIRES END OF 1996. C I • A Permit to Clear Rights-of-Way is issued for the lands described herein (ORS 477.685). [X] - A Notice is given to the State Forester and the Department of Revenue of the intent to harvest timber (ORS 321.550). UGB - City of Tigard: forest operations are regulated by the city. For permits/regulations contact Bonnie Mulhearn @ 639-4171 x349. I. WHERE TIMBER HARVESTING IS A PART OF THE PROPOSED OPERATION: A. NOTICE TO TIMBER OWNER: Party owning the harvested timber at the point it is first measured is shown in the section marked TIMBER OWNER and is responsible for payment of the Oregon Tither Taxes. B. NOTICE TO LANDOWNER: Party shown in the section marked LANDOWNER is responsible for reforestation of the site if so required. II. PRIOR APPROVAL BY THE STATE FORESTER AND WRITTEN PLANS ormoommo fri Ii-Trrp.[Tirp* • I I - A PRIOR APPROVAL may be required before certain activities can commence on the Operation. A WRITTEN PLAN may be required for the situations indicated by an (X) Below. Approval of a WRZTTEN PLAN or a WRITTEN WAIVER must be obtained from the Forest Pr4ctices Forester before any portion of the OPERATION may commence. ] • Within 100° of a large lake or Type F or Type D etrean. (OAR 629-24-113 (a) 1 - Within 300, of a wildlife resource site lilted in the 1984 ODF/ODFW Cooperative Agreement. (OAR 629-24-113(h)1 [ I - Within 300" of any resource identified in the 700, 800, or 2300 series administative rules, (OAR 629-24-113(c)) -' Within 300' of a state or federally listed threatened or endangered wildlife resource mite. (OAR 629-24-113(d)] Please contact the Forest Practices Forester on the Unit Information sheet for further information on requirements that may be necessary to meet before activities/operation'begin. 4. Signed by:. Stuart S Bingham - Representing the Operator Bingham Investment Company Stuart Bingham 3939 NW St Helens Road Portland, OR 97210 (Landowner Copy) TH iTirm-rir-r ,44 I - . 4.0,11 District: Office: County; WOSTOT: Forest Grove Forest Grove Washington Date Received: Time Received: 3/08/96 Mail 15 DAY WAITING PERIOD REQUIRED ******** NoTicE ******* The State Forester has determined the following PROTECTED RESOURCES are located within or adjacent to your operation area: Operator: Stuart Bingham Bingham Investment Company 3939 NW St Helens Road Portland, OR 97210 Phone: (503)224-2676 Landowner: Stuart Bingham Bingham Investment Company 3939 NW St Helens Road Portland, OR 97210 Phone: (503)2242676 Timberowner: Stuart Bingham Bingham Investment Company 3939 NW St Helens Road Portland, OR 97210 phone: (503)224-2676 James E. Brown State Forester District Forester 111 I 1111'111111' 11.11.11 11111 No.38 4 Ii tmikommik0,04. 02q1 iscNcl --4.0—g*------"ii---ilg 11.11 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 Lig 1111 1111 9; 1111 1..vg 111111111 IIIIIIIII 1 ti--- IIII cg lilt 111111111 1 eZ 1 (III tg till Jill OZ 1111 Mil 61 1111.1,1J111111 1 st 1111 Li MI 111111111 1 9):1 2T 11111111i 1111 tt 1111 IIII ET IIII I IIIIIiim gi I iiiiiiiii it iinitill I OT iniiini I 6 ini iiii 81 niiimi L 1111 inHulnin 91 9 nil it mi nu nil C InI lilt 3 nu mi Twms mtio 50,14,01,_ RIM 17,344- IF' 162,54 SDI 9-17 17 OF 43 ST, MH RIM 175,99 1E 170,30 (COT AS-BUILT) CB RIM 175.15 JE 172.30 30' OR'Wy ed 0 2 Ott 0 rttrOrrr wfv 0 WV PP OAS .10 00 .0001■01111101110 P001. oPP Opp 4 N 1 2" HP 1111011.1411011.111.1111,1011411.011.1.11/1911.101114,111.711.11011.1.1. OPM.vmetwavo.v./.0..m.....11...ROMMIV.SIIP wor poi 1110111111 111111.. 1111. 11011010.111wit* It* 0 PP x X 7" F 22"F,x x q, Xt‘ X r----- 22"F N. 9 24"F X- , e x lour x x 13 L_LJ LLJ 0 W/MH 0 0 W/M1-1 0 witAH L X 11"M x 5"M X< AN. X X 30"F X 18" F X 24"F moo v.. ammo X x 18"F J 1,1bt X4X:4"F' F X .::14 16"F X 14"F If *6' X 16"rx xr.F- 8" X 'A X „t c, 18" F ifro,F X 6'F' X # x?" rv`b 8' x F X xxte16"F19X x 6 x 2O» FIV>x<X h: „t X X 5" F X X n v6 0"F X124" Fx 4,•<, z Nc° 4A x 1Z F x x A ?',; 9,„ .111.1=1111;111 nil 1111111 SIE A 7" F X \ 464 x it Agfa' x 4 anon' !, X , A X.9 10" F X IIII 18"F Xx X X 6. ,4: '4k 22 6"H s 6N" X4 4 sp,o, x X 24" F , A 32F >< X '•' 4; x..e. MIR all" III II ill e F. X A X 24"F XN (6A xx ^. (I, 0A XN 21"F Xct X1/' X XIII illiiti! JINNI SPEW 1111111111, Milt Illrait Milli, NOR 9"F NMI Ulla X 4A x4 iiiiiilli,:‘ Mill # A III x(19 4 ,. )< )'26"F , 2 6" F IS ,A, o <4 XhN><,/ . V , psis Im III lira pliiii1111111111111 11113111111111n N Xrl° 16111111011111111 oNX` 411 tril I Irmmlipplam! o.m x .,,,.A xN^, AIIIIi1111111 11' XXI\ •. c4,4 o —421 19111111 IP will1111111111111 roily Ellrosimi umainumpoomatu morainenxillr"Flori all IllallIralliallallialti « ANNIIIIIIIIII1111111111111munn ill_4_41111111111171a111111§§1111111111Millir MIN IlEgtiiiii11111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111.111111111B11111141111111111111111114111111111311 rillillifiliallrili— ' lrIMIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIV x 18" F X 18' 0<( xti,1:ec x A X, %12"F e xNN34"F X X 12"F X 24"F 12"26" F X " F 6S‘` X(1" X / 5"DW X X • XX 14"F X 24"F 22"F X Nbt X N X XI x6Vrl'A # A \.\\ X X X 24"F X 20"F 4`` x 4 m Nanuinammomomath.,., 417 1111111111/111111111111111K11111.11119ftob, Sp.Aiffff 11111911111M :WI NMI 1111111111116111 MIR 12 )16" X ■,4.•4‘ x X ,■° 4 xe X 10"AL X 20"F 14"F' X rt4 ,A x )(4.1- xi2-1 4"F X2-1O" ou X 18"F Artrotramote x4 X 3-10"AL X 13"F XX 13F A X X(o X26 13' 4.1.110001, .41,110.aMMIO 1,0.F 26"F 9"11"12"F X 15" F X 10"F X 15"F X X 22" X 18" F 22"F X 20"F X 18" F X 8" F X 12'F' X 22"F X20"F ..)e X 11 " 454. 454 x x #A X(//tx 24"F X 12"F X x 137 X 26"F X 18"F" '' >< tr 4 e I X 44 4 X xx 20" F Xx1,1,.<t X 13" F x A X, de 04 X, 10"F X N-0„ .4% 12"F X X 20" F X 14"F X 34"F X 7"F X x auf" X x 22 F Xx? 189F x x o /cr., ,c■ 15"F X 2"F X 5 X 9,N x,s0 X 12"F X 24" F X 20"F X 24"F FH x45) xr X 5" OW 0A X " 12"F XX 24F xc) ' 1ObM x ......z. rs A-171' 1 x`I'' e 1 1 x' 1 L 0 A X to x x X 0 I \ 2D i 0 ," o eX l0 4 x X <( 124vX1, t4 X ., X 1 8X 9F 24F 4 X0 N o ) N N e o t da , ' e< se << CO4X NA X 17X :X xce fi #4 k x X 1420F 1 4" F X ■4 'F X X x 1,11' F 20F X 12"F X R, ,AN X 15" F 7(91:4, s‹, X 14"F h‘ x209r X 22" F X X r X'13"F N4D 15"F X X xe oec X 12"F 44 X Nr° X 12"14"24"F X X (.,44 N- X 20"F X 11"F ler 111187" X 9 xN (1 PP ' r ft ?F X L-"•=7-"".."-1,i-p-- 10"F >< 04 '04 A Z< nomor' tommosommals• x,, , X 24" r . .nmx X IN 4, 11 PP 0 x >s< \ es- X X 28"F X 12"E x,be Xt. 5'F X 18 icelc 7"F X x N6A X "F Xx9/ x'c X PP Q 14"F X 15"F X X 3-6"Al X X 1111111 X 22" F X 7"O X 2126% ><)< X 2x-280", FF. IS""( 1 X 10"F X 0A X 14"F Y p\r‘,, XX '1\ N X'N 6 0A 0m X .44 e< X NIX 064. x X 12 F X 22" F X 10" F X e x 18"F 7:FXXX"1":>5<":::C-11.— 1 x X 16"E 22" F X AN* & 27"F 114"F X #e< X ox I ptA ' X e*F X" 4)A prfrOrr.V.Ort.trre,,,,,,,,,,,,,m,romp ',v.-It veyereIVIVI 7" X izr 1 1 a" F Xi 1 0 LP 4, X 20" F 14"F 2" " 1 0" M 16" 16" X 3 X 12"F x 27"-r X 10"F X 12"F *1,,,'"" 7/ 14" F >C X tt)A 3e," 30 0 15 GRAPHIC SCALE 30 o 20 LEGE\ ( IN FrEr inch SO ft. TREE PROTECTION AREAS (FIELD VERIFICATION BY ARBORIST) I 0 04 LLJ 0 LO MA LLJ 00) (1) Ld >0 O' M 0 < 0 T etc PROP 4 15,504 k 25,k 'frek woo EXPIRES: 6 304all DATE: 1 /1 9/96 REVISION EDITION CLOSING DATE: DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 1/24/96 (Fe, MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INC. `=-' 1993 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED I3TY afcsSatwEltaNA,Vgi'Nfo2074,6.F1 AND ARE NOT TO USED R O.* DUCED IN ANY MANNER, EXCEPT WITH THE PRIOR WRIIIEN PERMISSION OF M.EL SHEET SD6 OF JOB NO 293037 IF THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGI8LE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT 1 T 1111'11-r ig "Tit izy ri Agig; rrHlt 0 4 11I1 f11114 711111111 111111111 111111111 t 3 11111111 611111 f111111I1 IlIloIlIll trir791 411771; I. - 11 1111 I 1 I 11 'PI 11 I I 111 111 111 N0313 Et t 11I 168 41 9 111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111;11111'11 5poki5a, Q37 -SD6. 7 77,77771"7"7,77,777,77,,,, RN 173.89-- IE 162.54 SDR 93-17 18 01743 ST.MH RIM 175.99 IE 170.30 (COT AS-BUILT) CB RIM 175.15 IF 172.30 p 30° DRINY G I r3 LLJ z LiJ 0 Z I C1 0 w/MH 0 wpm 1.. - irammumme 11111111 mommuimin mmiumuomm amimmummo immos, P P OPP 4 11 4 • 0 24.00' •••••••■■■■MINONIA00.11■11011% ..*•■•■•■•••■••••■•■•. 15.00 0 0 c-3 18.00 18.00 54.00' 9.00' 15.0 0 1 1 15. (NI 00 15.00 -0 63.00' 18.00 :10.001 0 d ..„-mmimmummitm ormouniToramen,16. .11111N11101111 ORB •74 NEN NINE 0 0 9.00 24, 18.00' 0' 0 .11111-.0-■ 30,00' 18.00' 0 0 0 0 0 id cf. 9,00' 0 0 11C)Qj 0 PP • I F THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE 011IGINAL DOCUMENT, 19.00' .00' 0 PP 15.00' 22.00' PP 0 30.00' 15.00' 0 160.00' FF178.50 1111111 11111111 4111111. rmom mommillinlialord111111 • IMINN NNIANNININNENNIIII 155.00' 18.00' FF=180.00 MO WM 6.00 18.00' (-N 18. 00' LU 0 0 d 1 18.00 PP 0 30.00' isamisvorronmermoserammenan 18.00' 25.00' 1 MN 0 LP PP Iwg 11 III 1111 ;11;1 11 11 1 1 111 I I 1111111111r 1. PYLON SIGN GRAPIIIC SCALE 30 0 18 30 00 AIKommweimmelasionerrows 120 volinision„ SITE A ar FzEir ) inch 30 ft. \1ALYSIS • • • • . • TOTAL SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA: GROUND FLOOR: MEZZANINE: TOTAL: LANDSCAPE (INCLUDES ONLY PERVIOUS SURFACE): REQUIRED: PROVIDED: PEDESTRIAN LANDSCAPING/COURTYARD: PARKING: REQUIRED BY TIGARD CODE (GENERAL RETAIL): PROVIDED: STANDARD: COMPACT: HANDICAPPED: TOTAL: 11111111 Anneatemumwsulammosommoneetime 298,319 SQ,FT. 69,265 SQ,FT. 6,000 SQ,FT. 74,945 SQ,FT. 44,748 SQ,FT. (15%) 52,769 %VT, (17.7%) 14,190 SQ,FT. (4.8%) 187 (2.5 PER 1000 csr) 253 (72.9%) 66 (24.8%) 8 (2,3%) 347 allIMININIAMENIMNEXIMIRANIMMIN■PINEMVilmminoweirmematv.......0...."""i".".""""."'"""' -1PF9F1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 liff'ffitimili1111111 tid.efS e 111111111 I Z I 01111.101 LAP noc/oor- v„(971f 1 v. (f) ,1\.\\0( 0\O9 trio' 1,-11(;\ NY) -et 50614,672 -2L1, C:t w 44, 11:34 0 CL 0) 0) C4 te) 00 0 C4 (8Z" - 2 i I f0 4t acncia ... ' ' : ...,: 18 imIMNONI CO 1....% X CsI 0 C4 C 1i K .. 't LAJ • tc co) „>454 iZ-i 20 irie 4 6 0. 41:1 0 0 ... 0 0 t** „ CNI tO Z 1.0 • 0 CO CD 1‘... 1 •,.... 0 1 . 1.1 1,... 0 0 Cv.1 ..-- = m Cfn•i NI *0" """ 10 00-N, 0 1.., re) Z .,... 0 8 1.8 0. cf), .4,6,7; o - c < .. .... aCt 0 *(:.3 tg CZ ji :T.. DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 1/24/96 op PROP • 4r 15,504 "4. Ct= EXPIRES: 6 30 DATE: 4-7-94 DRAWN BY: KAW\SAS CHECKED BY: KJK\LS MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INC. 1093, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED THESE DRAWING ARE THE PROPERTY OF MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INC, (WEI) AND ARE NOT TO DE USED OR REPRO- DUCED IN AMY MANNER, EXCEPT WITH THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF M,E,I, SHEET OF 293037 SD1 JOB NO. CD CTS cr \CIVIL (Y) (Y) nJ [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] 1 . BINlGHAM1 SITE DEVEL - TIGARD APPLICANT'S STATEMENT FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW This is an application for Site Development Review for a proposed grocery store on a 61- acre site near the S.W. 72nd Avenue /S.W. Durham Road intersection. Accompanying documents include a traffic analysis summary, arborist report, and plans showing the proposed existing conditions, site development, grading, utilities, landscaping, and building elevations and floor plan. Public notification for this project was accomplished as required by the Tigard notification procedures, effective July 1, 1993. A meeting was held on August 12, 1993, and a sign was posted as required. Since only three property owners are within 250 ft. of the site, individual discussions were held. Meetings also were held with Tri-Met and the Oregon Department of Transportation. The site was the subject of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment / one change in 1991. The change to General Commercial was approved after extensive investigation of the need for commercial lands, the unique characteristics of the site, and the capacity of the transportation system. The traffic analysis prepared at that time is the foundation for the development - specific analysis which accompanies this application. The proposed development includes a 68,000 ± sq. ft grocery store and related parking and landscaping. All Tigard Development Code standards are met by the proposal, and no variances are requested. Specific development statistics are indicated on accompanying drawings. Approval standards cited in Section 18.120.180(A) of the Tigard Code are addressed as follows: 1. "Code Sections :" a. 18.84 Sensitive Lands Not applicable. There are no floodplaln, drainage areas, wetlands, steep iupes, or unstable soils on the site, b. 1884 Manufactured Homes Not applicable, rs \VVP DATA \9103 \93037 \17NAPIR1,ko 1 c. 18.92 Densit , Not applicable. d. 18„144 Accessoryr )ses Not applicable. e. 1896 Additional 'Yard Requirements. The proposed building meets the required setback of 30 ft. from centerline of S.W. 72nd plus the normal yard requirement, which in the CG zone is 0 ft. f. 16.98 ht Limitation 7 L c " The proposed building meets the height requirements. }, /. g. and Screenin 5/ 1 The accompanying drawing indicates landscaping as required by Ch. 100, including street trees along S.W. 72nd Avenue and within the parking area. Street trees also are used to define vehicular access and pedestrian areas, while evergreen and native materials are used to screen parking and trucking areas. An irrigation plan will be submitted with building permit documents. h. 18.102 Visual Clearance Visual clearance areas are provided by the accompanying plan. 18.106 Cuff- Street Parkin The accompanying play, provides 354 spaces based on five per 1,000 sq. ft of building area, plus 13 to accommodate the employee use. The parking area design meets the dimensioned standards of the Code with respect to stall size, aisle width, and compact stall percentage. The plan also provides a pedestrian corridor to Zink the main entry of the building with the southern portions of the parking area as well as to the Tri -IV1et Park and Ride facility. 18.108 Access The access plan indicated by the accompanying drawing provides for primary vehicular access onto S.W. 72nd Avenue at the Durharn Road signal and a second access located sufficiently far south to accommodate vehicular stacking. The internal system has been designed to provide clear spaces for through movements, to reduce off-site conflicts. The plan meets the dimensional requirements of Section 18.108.080. F:\WPOATA93-08\93037\17NAtilli.ko 2 • k. 18.114 Signs The accompanying building elevation indicates one building sign on the south face. Since the final signage requirements have not been determined, a separate sign permit application will follow. 1. 18.150 Tree Removal Since this is a Site Development Review application, the tree removal permit review is a function of overall site design. This site has a significant stand of sernnd growth Douglas Fir and undergrowth, which is of concern to the property owner as well as to the City. The site design specifically provides for the protection of several clusters of existing vegetation in critical visual exposure areas. These stands will be protected during construction, and a long -term maintenance plan will be enacted to ensure the trees' vitality. A consulting arborist, part of the project team, has reviewed the initial design and has offered recommendations reflected in the accompanying plans. He will, prior to site development, stake the tree protection area and submit a long-term tree maintenance plan. m. 18.164 Street and Utility Standards The site frontage on S.W. 72nd Avenue will be improved to City standard as part of the project. Signalization and other traffic improvements are addres ;d In an accompanying traffic study. 2. "Relationship to Natural Environment :" As described above, soil and topographic conditions are not a difficulty on this site and a concerted effort has been made to incorporate existing trees into the final site design. 3. "Exterior Elevations :" This section does not apply since no residential areas abut the site. 4, "Relationship Between Uses :" The vicinity of the site is commercial and industrial in nature. The proposed commercial building is similar in character, and the site development provides a quality of landscaping commensurate with existing industrial development to the north. "Privacy;" Not applicable, s\ wPPA "A93- 03 \93037\17NAt1a1,ka • • 6. "Private Outdoor Area;" Not applicable. 7. "Shared Recreation Use;" Not applicable. 8. "Floodplain" There is no floodplain on the site. 9. "Public/Private Space" . • . . The distinction between public and private space is provided by signage and landscaping. 10. "Crime Prevention" Although this section applies primarily to residential development, this project will provide adequate lighting and accessibility as envisioned by the criteria. 11. "Aconss" See Section 18.108 discussion above. 12. "Public Transit" The developer and operator at the proposed grocery have met with Tri-Met and are attempting to achieve a joint use agreement for parking and/or accessibility to the Park and Ride lot. 18. "Parking" See Section 18.106 discussion above. 14. "Landscaping" See Section 18.100 discussion above. 15. "Drainage" Storm drainage will be accommodated by drywells. Calculations and design accompany this narrative. FAWPDATA\93-08\0117\17NAM1.10 4 ,• 1 ' • 7 Or' A. • „ 11. r 16. "Handicapped Access" Access and handicapped parking is provided. 17. "Signs" See Section 18.114 discussion above. 18. "Underlying Zone" All provisions of the C.G. zone are met by this proposal. No variances are proposed F: \WPPATA\ 93.08 \ 93037\ 11WARI:11 ekd • . . eRog,szt ititc,/,z and '3= and _Lan/Lea/2s Conii.dt1n9 MEMORANDUM TO: Lans Stout Mackenzie/Saito & Associates Inc. FROM: Bob Mazany ASCA #133 Consulting Arborist DATE: auly 19, 1993 RE: Bingham Site EGETTE1-0 JUi. 2 1993 Meat, Eritigtrsin::g it:Lot Dora teo 1 have completed my site and plan review of the proposed development on the Bingham site, S.W. 72nd, in Tigard. It is my opinion that your plan revisions, made after our first plan review, will allow for the retention of some stands of trees and perhaps a few individual trees within parking island areas. A more definitive determination cannot be made at this time. When the proposal is approved, 1 would recommend the following: 1. When the clearing limits are determined and staked, a tree condition analysis of those trees designated to be retained be conducted by the Consulting Arborist. This will be to determine if unsafe conditions exist which would require the removal of additional trees and to develop a program of therapeutic care for the remaining trees. 2. Install tree protection fencing, as recommended by the Consulting Arborist, prior to the start of construction. This fence is to remain in place throughout the duration of construction. It must be placed as far from the tles as is practical, but in no inetance closer to the tree than one foot behind any necessary excavation line. Any necessary intrusion into the tree protection area must be with the approval and under the direction of the Consulting Arborist, 1 trust this brief, preliminary memorandum will be sufficient for your needs at this time. Please contact me when 1 may be of further assistance on this project. P. (D „Sox 1905, 2Eactetton., etzgon 9707,7 • (509) 6146*C,S07 / s• a. MAC ENZ1E ENGINEERING INCORPt RA CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • TRANSPORTATION PLANNING 19 0690 S.W. BANCROFT STREET • P. O. BOX 69039 OCI PORTLAND, OREGON 97201-0039 • (503) 224 -9560 • FAX (503) 228.1265 R E QK 1 ELE ° JOB NAME: Bingham Site Development DATE OF CALL: 9/28/93 PERSON: Allan Troyer COMPANY: OSHD TIME: 10 :30 a.m. JOB NO.: 293037.01 INCOMING CALL: OUTGOING CALL: PHONE #: 353-3097 REVISED 10/12/93, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALLAN TROYER.'S COMMENTS •X103. SUBJECT: 72nd / Lower Boones Ferry Intersection REMARKS: Allan indicated that he had visited the subject intersection subsequent to the meeting held on 9/9/93 at MEI. His review of field conditions concurred with those presented by MEI during the meeting. Specifically, the issues noted related to the weaving /positioning of vehicles attempting to queue in the 140' refuge, the safety concerns relating to southbound - to- eastbound left turns, and the current prioritization of movements into the refuge. Allan commented that his observations indicate that the existing phasing does not allow for efficient use of eastbound green time at the southbound ramps signal. It only takes about 14 seconds to clear the storage, and then the traffic turning into the storage from one lane cannot feed traffic effectively. Split phasing and using dual turns as the MEI plan calls for would more effectively feed the storage area and also remove the northbound /southbound conflicts. l informed Allan that the Development Application has been submitted recommending these improvements. We will call Allan if a meeting is arranged to discuss implementation. Every effort has been made to accurately record this conversation. If any errors or omissions are noted, please provide written res•onse within five days of receipt. DPO /kc co: Allan Troyer, Lee Gunderson - 0 COT Gary Alfson, Dick Bewersdorff City of Tigard Tom Wolch, Doug Norval - Washington County Kim Knox, Alan Danahe. Tri -Met Stuart Bingham Bingham Construction Dale Chandler - Supermarket Development Corporation Don Odermott, Lana Stout W Mackenzie Engineering Incorporated Donald P. Odermott, P.E. POPONTA93.10 W3037,01i1 MTTCi ,kc • 6 �r ro ; MACIKEiNZIE ENGIN5ERING INCORPORATED CIVIL • STRUCTURAL * TRANSPORTATION PLANNIN 0690 S.W. BANE: ROFT STREET • P, 0. BOX 69039 PORTLAND, OREGON 97201.0039 • (503) 2249560 • FAX (503) 22612 RE RCS P E TIATOCJN JOB NAME: Bingham Site Development DATE OF CALL: 1 0/8/93 PERSON: Kim Knox COMPANY: Tri -Met TIME: 10 a.m. S1S11"1 4CI 13 1993 IGAID CIAO °' JOB NO.: 293037.01 INCOMING CALL: OUTGOING CALL: PHONE #: J SUBJECT: Review of Traffic Issues REMARKS: Kim indicated that Tri -Met staif is still evaluating the conclusions of the traffic study and their effects on Tri -Met operations. They also are in review of other sites in the Tualatin area as they need to find an additional 250 parking spaces. Kim indicated that Td -Met engineers are still reviewing the issues, including pedestrian structure configuration and cost, and may still need more information. I indicated that they should call us if we can be of any additional assistance. I agreed to let Kim know if a meeting is arranged to discuss the alternatives. Every effort has been made to accurately record this conversation: If any errors or omissions are noted, please prcvide written response within five days of receipt, Donald P. Odermott, P.E. DPO /kc cc: Kim Knox - Tri-Met Gary Afton, Dick Dewersdorff (City of Tigard) Stuart Bingham, Dale Chandler w Bingham Construction t;\W P ©ATA193.10\93037.01 \08ITTC 1. k o • Washington County Department of Land Use a' Transportation (FAX :693 -4412) Land Development Services 155 N First Ave, Suite 350 Hillsboro, OR 97124 'Tigard Planning Department P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 Re: BINGHAM SITE Date October 8 1993 RECEIVED PLANNING OM 12 1993 Washington County has reviewed this development application and submits the following comment and required conditions for access to SW Lower Boones Ferry Road and SW Bridgeport Road intersection, a County Minor Arterial and a County Major Collector respectively, via SW 7';nd Avenue: COMMENT This development does not directiv access any County roads. However, pursuant to the standards outlined in Resolution and Order 86 -95, the intersection of SW 72nd Avenue, SW Lower Boones Ferry Road, and SW Bridgeport Road may be within the 10% impact area of the proposed development. The County's Traffic Analyst has a copy of the applicant's Access Report and is reviewing it. Upon completion of the traffic analysis for this development proposal, the County Traffic Analyst's findings and recommendations will be forwarded to the City. This review and the recommended conditions of approval which will be developed as a part of that review are required by Resolution and Order 86-95 and Section 501 5.2.B. of the Community Development Code. REQUIRED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL A. PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL AND ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT: Submit Plans, obtain Engineering Division approval, and obtain a facility permit for construction of the following public improvement: Any additional off -site safety improvements found to be required for compliance with R &0 86-95 upon completion of the County Traffic Analyst's review. These improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the requirements of the Washington County Uniform Road Improvement Design Standards, B. Prior to Occupancy the road improvements required by condition A. shall be complete and accepted by the County. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Please send a notice of decision and appeal information to the County upon completion of your review. We would also appreciate the opportunity to review a draft of the City's conditions pertaining to access to the intersection of SW Lower Boones Ferry Road and SW Bridgeport Road, If you have any questions, please contact me at 648-8761. Torn Harry, Associate Planner c. Lynn Bailey, Doug Norval kh \.i r krahr:p\trtirost kb. ti p MACIktENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED CIVIL • STRUCTURAL e TRANSPORTATION PLANNING 0690 S.W. BANOROFT STREET • P. O. BOX 69039 PORTLAND, OREGON 97201.0039 • (503) 224-9560 • FAX (503) 226 -1285 RECORD OP TELEPHONE CONVEFt$ATIQN JOB NAME: Bingham Site Development DATE OF CALL: 9/28/93 TIME: 10:30 a.m. PERSON: Allan Troyer COMPANY: OSHD SUBJECT: 72nd / Lower Boones Ferry Intersection REMARKS: JOB NO.: 293037.01 INCOMING CALL: OUTGOING CALL: PHONE #: 353-0097 Allan indicated that he and Lee Gunderson had visited the subject intersection subsequent to the meeting held an 9/9/93 at MEL Their review of field conditions concurred with those presented by MEI during the meeting. Specifically, the issues noted related to the weaving /positioning of vehicles attempting to queue in the 140` refuge, the safety concerns relating to southbound -to- eastbound left turns, and the current prioritization of movements into the refuge. Based upon their site review, they now believe that the interim "fix" proposed by MEI is the best solution available, short of a permanent "fix" (which would require filling of the adjacent pit and road relocations). The interim fix would include dual northbound right -turn lanes, dual southbound left-turn lanes, north /south split phasing, and construction of a pedestrian overcrossing. I informed Allan that the Development Application has been submitted recommending these improvements. The concept of allocating the funds for the final "fix" and "doing nothing now," as suggested by Tom Wolch (Washington County), has been rejected by the developer and also would not be acceptable to ODOT. Every effort has been made to accurately record this conversation. If any errors or omissions are noted, please provide written response within five days of receipt. Donald P. Odermott, P.E. DPO /ko cc: Allan Troyer, Lee Gunderso DOT Gary Alfson, Dick Dewersdo - City of Tigard Torn Wolch, Doug Norval Washington County Kim Knox, Alan Danaher - Tri -Met Don Oderrnott, Lens Stout .. Mackenzie Engineering Incorporated F AW P DATAI93.09193037.0112 6 RTc 1, k c 5 •a r.0 4 OCT T 6 -93 WED 14,09 MSA /MEI A FAX NO, 5032749812 MACKENZIE /SAITO & ASSOC1ATES, .Cn Architecture Planning * Interior Design 503/224-9570 * FAX 503/228.1285 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Civil * Structural * Transportation 503/224 -9560 m 503/228 -1285 0690 S.W. Bancroft Street P.O. Box 69039 Portland, Oregon 97201 -0039 P. 01 • FAX COVER SHEET Date: G ` Project Number: `,3 `7 o PLEASE DELIVER THE FOLLOWING PACES IMMEDIATELY TO; Company:, Q /- Attention: �•L Project Description: D, 9 2-8 Comments or Special Instruction: PAX Access Number:,,_„ rr'r r y ...M.rw.ssarertgar.r-r.mommdw.MW!A balr...drwa1,lU 'Ta vlrwrr.r�.r...�++�r�•. -- Total Number of Pages OncluSing this cover sheet): , .2 -M- -. If you did not receive all pages, please calif .,._ Send Original FAX to: Fila�......�.r. Sender" CONF DCNTtALITY NOTICE: TM information contained In this 'facsimile transmission is odnfldenUal ruu! Is intended only for the use of the individual of ehUhr named above, f the reader of this message Is not the Intended tetoipient, tie serves as notification that any feeding, disclosure, copying, dlaalbutlon, or the taking of any action in relia►noe on the contents of this communication *Uon k strictly prohibited, If this rrenes lsaton Woe received try *tent, immediately notify UN at /4 . 5TO it) artatlge tOr rtiturrr 01 treat orlofni d faarlrnffe, OCT-- 6-93 WED 14:10 MSA /ME I FAX N0, 5032749812 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED CIVIL • STRUCTURAL e TRANSPORTATION PLANNING 0650 $,W, EBANCROFT STREET a P1 O, BOX 69039 PORTLAND, ND, ©RE EON 97201 039 a (533) 2244560 e FAX (503) 228 -1265 • JOB NAME: Bingham Site Development DATE OF CALL: 9/28/93 PERSON: Allan Troyer COMPANY: OSHD TIME: 10 :30 a,rn. P, 02 JOB NO.: 293037.01 INCOMING CALL: OUTGOING CALL: 1 PHONE #: 353.3097• SUBJECT: 72nd / Lower Scones Ferry Intersection REMARKS: Allan indicated that he and Lee Gunderson had visited the subject intersection subsequent to the meeting held on 9/9/03 at MEf. Their review of field conditions concurred with those presented by MEI during the meeting, Specifically, the issues noted related to the weaving /positioning of vehicles attempting to queue in the 140' refugee the safety concerns relating to southbound -to- eastbound left turns, and the current prioritization of movements into the refuge, Eased upon their site review, they now believe that the interim "fix" proposed by MEI is the best solution available, short of a permanent "fix" (which would require filling of the adjacent pit and road relocations). The interim fix would include dual northbound rightWturn lanes, dual southbound left-turn lanes, north /south split phasing, and construction Qf a pedestrian overcro sing, I informed Allan that the Development Application has been submitted recommending these Improvements., The concept of allocating the funds for the final "fix" and "doing nothing now,'s as suggested by Tom Mich (Washington County), has been rejected by the developer and also would not be acceptable to O(OT. Every effort has been made to accurately record this conversation, if any errors cir omissions are noted, please provide written response within ilvu days of receipt. DPO /ko coi. Allan Troyer, Lee Gunderson - ODOT Gary Alfson, Dick Dewersderff - City of Tigard Tom Welch, Doug Norval - Washington County KKim Knox, Alan Danaher - Tel -filet Don Oder Mott, Lee's Stout - M eekenlie Engineering Incorporated / ill '4' P Donald P. Oderrott, P.E. 7 MACKENZ1b1.1/43AITO & ASSOCIATES, P.C. ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING, INTERIOR DESIGN 0690 SW. BANCROFT ST. • P.O. BOX 690:39 PORTLAND, OREGON 97201-0039 • (503) 224-9570 to FAX (503) 228-1285 September 22, 1993 City of Tigard Attention: Dick Bewersdorff 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223-8199 Re: Bingham Site Development Project Number 293037 Dear Dick: Enclosed is a complete package of information for Site Development Review for the Bingham property on S.W. 72nd Avenue. The documents include a narrative describing conformance with Code criteria, documentation of neighborhood notification requirements, traffic study, and graphics. You will note that the traffic study suggests an approach which would commence a process to achieve a solution to the existing congestion at the interseotion of S.W. 72nd Avenue/S.W. Bridgeport Road. Since any long-term solution will require a significant commitment by all entities, we hope that this application will precipitate an on-going cooperative effort to this end. Please call me to discuss any questions that you may have. If it would be appropriate to meet to discuss the traffic recommendations, we would be happy to do so. Sincerely, Enclosure cc: Stuart Bingham Bingham Investments Dale Chandler - Supermarket Development Corp. Leon Hartvikson Pac Trust F:\WPDATA\93-09\98037\221.1 ks , -.. • ; . •••.: Name of applicant et,Di\,) s-ite to P-) Subject Property Tax Map and Lot # 1 — 1 3 ja Address or General Locationzi1/4J AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE 1• do affirm that I am e resen the party initiating interest in a proposed affecting the land located at 't3 / / 3 /3174,12.0i) and did on the 10'1' day of , 19 2q personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. This day of 19_61L Signature wyrrartforimses OFNLIAL SEAL EDNA tt, GASTC!",1 .os. It* .:*-0 /N IP tslt: 1,1 '10'1 t *,'"1411‘, . t 11 1095 Notary Public for the State of Oregon , My Commission Expires: WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OP 'THE SIGN POSTINn, FIFTURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OH 97223 I, 57124a-__I, being duly swont, depose and say that on is _ q3, I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list notice of a meeting to discuSs a proposed development at 'ZS/ 3 (/o0 a copy of which'hotice so mailed is atta0hed hereto and made a part of hereot further stilt that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addres,ued- to said persons and were deposited 'on the datr, indicated above in the United States Post Woe at with postage prepaid thereon. `TY'k orricIAL EAL a,,41` ININA R. CiATOil Vu MY 1L 'i9, M ! i L r NCI ST rDes Ei Nei ti-AAA, 3 /re-. (A" Ulvicrotk) CL e Nrii -a:19r ort- vrt- c.ka+pa kei afre,c, / oi g o-t cal> c."1 e_ I 5 0(4 ric„ (cA-4-1.:711 tossoc a a. p 411- U?-d iv dase,Tvla:--ro I 5- / S. SA/ 3irk..qtA) 0/3 g-e-LiAJA-1 p1-Nio e-1-? • r • MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED CIVIL • ITIUCTURAL. • 1 PANWORTAI ION 11100 5V, HANCHOL t • PO BOX 0039 ION I AND, ohLuioN ji',.!01-1 Jo • (I-9:4) 22,1-9riffi • FAX (51) ) ?.'d.9-12S5 BY DATB JOB NO. SHt or MACREN NOINEERING INCOPIPO1A1a6 1992 ALL RIGHTS RESSRVED MACKENZI& NGINEERING INCORPORATED -.. CIVIL 0 STRUCTURAL a TRANSPORTATION 0690 SW. BANCROFT STREET • PO. BOX 69039 PORTLAND. OREGON 97201.0039 • (503) 224 -9560 • FAX (503) 228-1285 August 10, 1993 Pacific Realty Associates, L.P. Attention: Leon Hartvickson 15115 S.W. Sequoia Parkway, Suite 200 Portland, Oregon 97224 Re: Bingham Site Project Number 293037 Dear Leon: As I described during our telephone conversation, this letter is sent to you as required by the City of Tigard notification requirements. Mackenzie Engineering Incorporated (MEI) is working on behalf of the owner of the property located at the northeast corner of the S.W. 72nd Avenue /S.W. Bridgeport Road intersection (tax lot 1700, map 2S1.13AD). The owners are considering proposing City review and approval of a Site Plan Review applirtion for a new grocery store at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permit, we would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meetill on Thursday, August 12, 1993, at 3 p.rn at the offices of PacTrust, 15115 S.W. Sequoia Parkway, Suite 290, Portland, Oregon 97224. Please note this will be an informational meeting on .fir i i plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at 224+ 9560 if you have any questions. Slnuerely, (A 7 Lars Stout LS/ko i+;\WP ATA\93.O8\ Z\1OLi,ko MACKENZIE- LNGINEERING INCORPORATED CIVIL STRUCTURAL d TRANSPORTATION 0690 SW. BANCROFT STREET • PO, BOX 67039 PORTLAND. OREGON 07201-0039 • (503) 224-9560 • FAX (503) 228-1285 August 10, 1993 Carl L Swett 13485 Atwater Lane Lake Oswego, Oregon 97034 Re: Bingham Site Project Number 293037 Dear Carl: As I described during our telephone conversation, this letter is sent to you as required by the City of "Tigard notification requirements. Mackenzie Engineering Incorporated (MEI) is working on behalf of the owner of the property located at the northeast corner of the S.W. 72nd Avenue /S.W. Bridgeport Road intersection (tax lot 1700, map 231- 13AD). The owners are considering proposing City review and approval of a Site Plan Review application for a new grocery store at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permit, we would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on Thursday, August 12, 1993, at 3 p.m. at the offices of PacTrust, 15115 S.W. Sequoia Parkway, Suite 200, Portland, Oregon 97224. Please note this will be an informational meeting on Drefieitall plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at 224- 9550 if you have any questions. Sincerely, LS /kc P; \WPDATA`93- 08`9303T\100.ka MACKENZI ,:NGINEERlNG INCORPORATED CIVIL e STRUCTURAL 0 TRANSPORTATION 0690 SW. BANCROFT STREET • PO. BOX 69039 PORTLAND. OREGON 972010039 • (503) 2249560 • FAX (503) 228-1205 August 10, 1993 Washington County Dept. of Land Use Attention: John Rosenberger, Director 155 N. First Hillsboro, Oregon 97123 Re: Bingham Site Project Number 293037 Dear John: As 1 described during our telephone conversation, this letter is sent to you as required by the City of Tigard notification requirements. Mackenzie Engineering Incorporated (MEI) is working on behalf of the owner of the property located at the northeast corner of the S.W. 72nd Avenue /S.W. Bridgeport Road intersection (tax lot 1700, map 2S1- 13AD). The owners are considering proposing City review and approval of a Site Plan Review application for a new grocery store at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permit, we would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on Thursday, August 12, 1993, at 3 p.m. at the offices of PacTrust, 15115 S.W. Sequoia Parkway, ,quite 200, Portland, Oregon 97224. Please note this will be an informational meeting on .prelirn r C plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at 224- 9560 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Wiv S)Z r- Lens Stout LS/ko F,\WPDATA\9 1-O8 \,03037 \1011,ko MACKENZIOLoAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.C. ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING, INTERIOR DESIGN 0690 SW. F3ANCROFT ST • P.O. BOX 69039 PORTLAND, OREGON 97201-0039 • (5(3) 224-9570 • FAX (503) 228-1285 ATTENDANCE AT MEETING OF PROPERTY OWNERS HELD ON AUGUST 12, 1993, AT PACTRUST OFFICE: Leon Harvickson Ken Grimes Peter Becton Kim Knox Carl Swett Wilma Stuart Bingham Lens Stout PacTrust PacTrust PacTrust Tri-Met LazerOuick interested party property owner Mackenzie Engineering Incorporated P:\WPDATA\93438\93037\181VITatio SEP 24 '93 01 :58PM FRST AMER TITLE CUSTOMER SERVICE P.1/5 First Atnet an Title Insurance 'Corm of Oregon An aasumod busmen nosh df TITL IN5UNANCE COMPANY OF OridOON 1700 S.W. FOURTH AVE,, PORTLAND, OR 972011 -5512 (503) 222 -3651 E ��yyJRri R �R�O>.C'i.I�Mlfllil®ilf.l.0�..� ,rwM4Me.elIINION* 93 l�arate Pripared EorllvE CONSUMER INFORMATION REPORT , p 2 rj lti�arpa$t ad Mac en le�svo �A n' '"r i't. ',4 t, a ti',, v �. LAN a• - 'h J M L. . �r ` t � —sop 'ID...—. "w,StA1r, We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you. Please remember First Amarir an 77tkd insurance Company at Oregon for your Escrow and Title Insurance reeds, Agents and office in the following r;ountiea in Oregon; Benton, Clackamas, Coast, Crook, Curry, Deschutes, Douglas, Gilliam, Hood Fiver, Jackson, Jelleraon, Josephine, Klamath, Lane, Lincoln, Linn, Malheur, Marion, Multnomah, Polk, Sherman, Tillamook, Umatilla, Union, Wallowa, Weslco, Washington, Wheeler and Yamhill, Thin title information has been turni hed, without chero*, in taonforrnranCe wlth;th i guidelines approved by the State fit Oregon lniurtote Cernhtleeloner, The Iheuretrott Divtslen oautione, Intern/Andel that this eervieei la drdriiorrnd to benefit the uhimarlte Insureds: indiscriminate uite only t ristittinQ intermediaries will riot be permitted, Said serviette May be discontinued, No liability Is assumed for any errors in thie report, TI -73 6/90 SEP 24 '93 01 t W 9PM FRST AMER TITLE CUSTOMER SERVICE FIRST AMERC,.LCAN TITLE PRO ERTY PROFILE Washington County *********************************************'*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * *4 * * * * * * * * * * * ** * ** * a s am a a a a a a aaaaaamaaaaamaaaaaaa OWNERSHIP INFORMATION aagrmoaaeaaeaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaoaaaeaa Ref. Parcel #:2S113AD 01700 Parcel No. :R0513778 TRSQ:025- 01W-13 -NE SE Owner : BINGHAM INVESTMENT CO CoOwner : Site Address : *NQ SITE ADDRESS* Mail Address : 3 939 NW SAINT HELENS RD PORTLAND OR 97210 Telephone asaaameasaaaaa = =Wta=W.:,aaesaa =aaa SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION aaaaaaaaoaaams aasamaasasaaaaaaaaaa4aca=asa Transferred: Document # :78028796 Sale Price :$364,684 Deed Type Is Owned : Loan Amount : Lender Loan Type Interest Rate: Vesting Type : a a aaaa. maaaaaaaaaasaaamaaasasasa aasaaaaaaaaamas ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFORMATION aaamamaaaaaa aaaaaaaamam== sassasaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.***.amaaaa Land 01,217,590 Structure: Other : Total. :$11,217,590 aaaamaaaaasasaa : =amalitaaaaamaaaaaaaaaaa PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Exempt Amount: Exempt Type : Improved Levy Code :02374 92 -93 Taxes :$28,387.70 Map Grid: asa a:w aaaY a ara taa aad as aria ma Carl;aa aaaa saas s m a Code: Census :Tract Flock ; NbrhdCd :Y2P MiliRate :22.8354 Sub/Plat: Land Use: 3002 VACANT, INDT STRI2 LI Legal :SEE USA LIEN DOCKET LJtDrr 26-34 : 6.60AC ROSEWOOD ACRE TRACTS Bedrooms : BathrootA Heat Method: Pool Appliance : Dishwasher Hood Fan Deck Garage Type: Garage SF aaa tea aaa aaa as aaa: ar a aa: aa+i aaa aaa Saar arat � a� as Sam al,ar ua aa, 0000 ale PROPERTY CHA ACTERTST ;CS aaei a as aaaa as ma aaa. a m ra : ar a rim »aa m a t a aai,m aaa k .a;aa Lot Acres :6.60 Lot SgPt :287,496 BsmFin SP BemUntinSF: Bldg SqFt Porch Sept: Attic StFt : Deck Sq't Ext Finish: Collet Type: Year Built t EtfYe.rBit : Floor Carer: Foundation Root Shape : Roof Matl Int eriorMat Paving Mat l: * *, * ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** * * * ** The Information Provicled Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed, pioTica. Cf.erairxt7 ' • "1721" ▪ AL iutireliketry :■rnimmtiv P.TOLLCQ ▪ TAT.E...11E.IIRE01" 4" "W•Mlignai4ti"TX.;.ii•WPW:PCIL:44,411.11.1414;41.74‘4,1J.;1444.2,E1,1,01.(-4":.;w4:4.4.44...«...... 4 4.41114t 1.4.... 44 44 1.,••■44. 1, ..1 1.4.4 4,••• OttdliDr, It 11.1.4.411144.••■■••464 ■••■ i ,b.....,.... ' !.; .,,' „' , • ' „' ''..“, '' ' ,, . ,' 4''' ,‘ ' . ' ' " ' ' ' ..' ' ' '• , 11 311.44171tr.10,11:thii'..004114114.1711XXIPTICX. ON VIVItSi ,4itt #tffjoVipierWipir,ge 'from entur#41%*ittalee0, ,,,,, , t„; a n , , easement t as iigar 'Jed 'i in '&19=4 , 1 ncl ud i rig terns' i'.frditl::IJoititr'y5,,'' „1.941 ' Cin di tl oni , -rttri dt f 'ohs 'aid Y. a et,pia.1 a ns , . -; • . • , , its.19)i$4,the'reof Tecoffifed, 1//41 . 'an ".. ea. Went ' teicl uai n5 tert$ . atm! ;,;,,,pror14:1.ons ,.,;htiercitrf,:. r4coidell' Notrembi6' 1'0,1 577. . rho. iruai=midaration fOrlhis cvnveyaniczeim $..16,4,r,624,24L.. Mere txnaiply with th1i aquirdammt .0.0 alai 1 690.....44,4441441,41444,414414411/141.101111.40.44.4.44m4•4111.141.440.444,4•11fta: 44 0.1.1641114400tobore /1111,14.4.16•611•411.111111.11+44.4•144414.44•1 4•*•eoe• ...... 4.4.4•11.•411 o,sn'Ooboos.11.,x. 4.161 ..... ... ........ ...... ....... . 41: ..... '.44114/4.14.1:*****:;:;41111.411...1.4.;44'....1.44:4,44•4114;41.04,..4% 1il ■.:111ZP4.40.„;lelar ••••• I • ....... .. fo. .... ....... 444,i4111 . • 01. 0.444 ' ,kia.§ittf 4. • 4. o. 4 4..4 4. 4141414 41.11% . .0,104.SZYnen'aglalArkt1534441thdl4.14?;3•11,WM2..444.44.4.....1416 ' )1'4z:4+:14; "'STATE OP 'oaramivi County' ot.)10111.65`.t0.11.,..“-) st• • Jun* 2° 78 ,/s/ • # Poroonoilly, „ippiAlred.,fito atxiva net aretei • TA . , Kt4 • ! .1, ....... • ...on .1.4,4114.14414,44114.1 ....... .1......146114.44•44,404.144.**,••4110,140.4. 14.0 ... • . id444,4.“•trao .444 ; ; f “. •••• 440 4,11! .1•{ " • t, , 4 :4 • a** • " a' • ' 4 • • ! VOMOWledged eh: 1011014 insina zit to —...rokartary act clod dud. (214.2141‘.1;:e.ill 4,1.4 44.14* 444 JO * 4ame$1••••••• Ary,tcorritnistion'expireit: • sDA7'.g OF,ORBOON X otiiiil37:Ituti the :tent was ,rad.tivad for retard Qv 3 . • —.0 at, andsyciardvd hi &oil pt o , ......... as Rawrd Q baeds o$ said county. We Wifekssic ray hand lind said at C.cithier ,...:';000.4...Itilt,rtoP*Sit.t4:4?7.0,1)111,00011111" °"..;, ". M114'. 4,14.4.4.1614 444.44.444 444,414■4.4.444.4.iii,4.14,1,44611,411.4.414,44,44614 Rartodit4 Cfttko • ..... i/4444•464;41$4;1/144440444m4r1.)04.4i4i4oiehh..„.atemy ItA11 O cmectaN at Wintcqi .,/,,u4o444.4444,/ Is ROW,1611t46411, OttierOW of Om* • , Wog .sod .E.1147f4iala laateteer ef Caws Worm** faf 1/40111 0#4inte'dka Neysit,Ittvritty t$x Out withkri ,trirmintentV ort"iittting;.04. reeehmil ' and model 0.o/4i:shoat .rowarti,%+ " . • CITY OF TIGARD PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES NON-RESIDENTIAL DATE: APPLICANT: Me-4,4pioos)5 AGENT: &i gl./141° A.OG0-3,(0.(-416 Phone: 46- Phone: PROPERTY LOCATION ADDRESS: iglu) k$1ZanaL 6e-e# TAX MAP TAX LOT: iddi-M 7:4. 700 NECESSARY APPLICATION(S): 5IDE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: ai.Z2Sre7Zy' Fo651616' Oixr Lor Fir& cArulae COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: del0E)Zbart..., (�4041212C I A C ZONING DESIGNATION: NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATION # CHAIRPERSON: ..(24v2d.4LARIIVIAJc PHONE: (0159- ZONING DIATAICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot size: 0 sq. ft. Minimum lot width: ,t'6) ft. Setbacks: front- 0 ft. side- 0 ft., rear-(9 ft. garage-, C) ft- corner-0 ft. from both streets. Maximum site coverage: a57% Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: 5Th Maximum building height: 45-ft. ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot frontage: 25 feet unless lot is Created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15 foot wide access easement. MaXimum lot, depth to width ratio of 2.5 to 1. SPECIAL SETBACXS Streets: ft. from centerline of 142 1L_4it. Established-mreasl- Lower intensity zones: -ft;,-along_the site's boundary • t': • • '1' 1 1 , • / SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS Building Height Exceptions (Code Section 18.98.020): Buildings located in a non-residentLal zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided: 1. A minimum FAR (building floor area to site area ratio) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; 2. All actual building setbacks will be at least 1/2 the building's height; and 3. The structure will not abut a residenial zone district. PARXING AND ACCESS Required parking for this type of use: Secondary use required parking: er (.10 414 A46 rtoe pe k- g. employees 014 145eal- sAir---f •25% of required spaces may be designated compact-only spaces. Standard parking space dimensions: 9 ft. X 18 ft. Compact parking space dimensions: 8.5 ft. X 15 ft. Disabled person parking: All parking areas providing in excess of five required automobile parking spaces shall provide appropriately located and designated disabled person parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided and parking space size are mandated by the Oregon Revised Statutes and Americans with Disabilities Act (see handout). A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be provided. ,Atic*vcle racks are required for civic uses, nom-residential uses, Cicommercial uses, and industrial uses providing 15 or more automobile parking spaces. Bicycle parking must be provided at a ratio of one bicycle rack space per 15 auto parking spaces. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic. The Planning Division can provide specifications for approved bicycle rack types. All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storge patking • areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: Minimum number of accesses: IlgQ__ Minimum access width: A,ti C-1- Maximum access width: 40 47 ></ Pedestrian access must be provided between building entrances and parking areas, outdoor common areas, and public sidewalks and streets. Parking area landscaping and screening: 144LKIL.p,61f,„ PPPPPPPPPPPPPP*■PPfypppppppppppppp*I:*.PPPPPPPP PPPPP*ff P00*PPPPPPPPP.■rPP.PPP•PP.PPPafPPPPPPPP or detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses, see Community Development Code Chapters 18.106 and 18.108. 4 n Page 2 1: ea • CLEAR VISION AREA The City requires that clear vision be maintained between three and eight feet above grade at road /driveway, road /railroad, and road /road intersections in specifies ", clear vision areas. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. No buildings, signs, trees or other visual obstructions are allowed between 3 and 8 feet above grade in these areas. LANDSCAPING %`street trees are required for all developments fronting on a public or rprivate street or a driveway more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right -of -way or on private propery'y within six feet of the right -of -way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of two inches at four feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on mature tree size. Further information on regulations affecting street trees and a list of recommended street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. , t / l Clem ��,siCx� th'ea5 minimum of one tree per seven parking spaces must be planted in and /around parking areas in order to provide a canopy effect. Landscaped screening of parking areas from views from public rights -of -way must be provided. cr n �. , I s , t of . 2.. 0tk DeVelOpmevit A & 4g borigA (' 6 itikV &fi t? V1 61. 0215 ►r ' N ex tiG , 5f6crF ecotetimieltds st,1,t v e of" 6►ae.. ►t. 4-Yee, teo r4.h �k -i'c es i tt.t. .frees ( ; SUFFERING AND SCREENING W -Ira -We- Cr►. -r �ti1� In order to increase pri-: .tcy and to reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer, areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are deocribed by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs. Site obscuring screens or fences are also required in some cases, and often are advisable even if not required. Required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and sidewalks. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in Code Chapter 18.100 and the Planning Division bulletin on landscaping and buffering. Required buffer widths applicable to your proposal area» J 0 ft. along north boundary Q ft. along east boundary ft. along south boundary ft. along west boundary In addition, sight obscuring screening is required a :ones Itot kt . vre.e,(1'/ Page 3 * n , SIGNS Permits must be obtained before erecting any sign in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if tihylainroposal is reviewed as part of a development application 01,14ed 3;m6ue Ae9111.,/' et .14 EafLieler AC‘C tw:4, o b U.,f) -crA.t er &s Wet( 6 ir AA. II If SENSITIVE LANDS 141/tAS 1S5ute Other Agency Permits: PUBLIC FACILITIES The purpose of the pre-application conference is to: (i) identify applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions; (ii) to provide City staff an opportunity to comment on specific concerns; and (iii) to review the application review process with the applicant including identifying who will be the final decision maker for the application. The extent uf public improvements and dedications to be required of the applicant will be recommended by City Engineering Department staff and approved by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision maker by City staff until all commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your project. Unless noted otherwise, the primary contact for questions related to public facility issues is e_hor Engineering Department, 639-4171 Rieht-olaydlp_AtIpn: The city of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public to increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification rights-of-way width specified by the Community Development Code. Approval of a development application for this site will require dedication of right-of-way for to 30 feet from centerline. rne iAite5 tob45 pO5.51.4 2. • to fee: from centerline. _ Page 4 V , • • • • • 1 • Street irnprovements 1. Cam street improvements will be necessary along 5L 7LwL 2. Needed street improvements will include Xx4aL.Clatgx4.1:17 a five-foot wide sidewalk, necessary street signs, streetlights, and a two year streltlighting fee. street improvements will be necessary along atrivRikk_xiic.. ictpetvfii baSect C>lik IYI;L:(2°{7 C 51-ttrAi Needed street improvements will include from centerline, curb and gutters, storm sewers, sidewalk, necessary street eigns, streetlights, streetlighting fee. feet of pavement a five-foot wide and a two year some cases where improvements deferred. In these are not street curre case property ownet(s) must e the property owner's righ improvement district forme ovements or other necessary public ly prac ical, the street improvements may be , as a con ition of development approval, the ecute a non- emonstrance agreement which waives to remonet ate agOttatAthee-formation of a local 1. 2. PedestrianwaygLimagis: Sanitary Sewers: The closest sanitar sewer to this property is an inch line located '0,k, 5(A3 7a.a lot The proposed development must be connected to a sanita sewer. 341-474Avalopgris teapan4lbIlity-40-extend-the-sawer-alang_the proposed development-s4te's Water Supply: The Tigard Water District (*Phone: 639-1554) or the-Tualatin V.a..1.1-Gy--Water,-1-r-i-e-6-4P-htiffr-647:71-ffil` provides public water oeritice in the area of this site. The appropriate Water District should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your propoeed developmnt. Fire Protection: Tualatin. Valley Fite and Rescue District (Contact: Gene 8irchill, 645-8533) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Other Agency Permits: Page 5 hirlemecitotts • TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county -wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance This action placed into effect an increased street development fee on all new development in Washington County. The City of Tigard has adopted the county's program. The City Traffic Impact Fee program will collect fees from new development based on the development's projected impact on the transportation system. Developing properties will be required to pay based on the number of trips they are projected to generate. The TIF its calculated based on type of use, size of project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at time of building permit issuance. "n limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until issuance of occupancy permit. Deferral of payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. STORMWATER QUALITY FEES /FACILITIES The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce, Resolution No. 90 -43, Surface Water Management Regulations, requiring the construction of on -site water quality facilities or fees in lieu of their construction. The resolution requires that a fee and /or construction of a water quality facility be built. The fce is based on the amount of impervious surface; for every 2640 square feet or portion thereof, the fee shall be $250.00. The City of Tigard determines if a fee or facility shall be built. � Ocae i= i 1.J0tA �. . _re w �v iAP v Necessary, storm sewer improvements: c., . 6 7Q0 'iptt.k "vt wakr~ i; a�� . STREET OPENING PERMIT No work within a public right. -of -way shall commence until the applicant has obtained a street opening permit from the Engineering Department, FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS On all projects that require a grading plan the applicant shall submit with the grading plan a typical floor plan for each lot which shall have the elevations of four corners of that plan along with elevations at the corner of each lot. ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS j2t::__ttve4_. E 0, rot. d 4'r Air Adttoititimot+ o A c I-'V,A 5 J:612.1\4 No's cep.. ► m etr , ►u , E . (4‘,106rittA CT1 o IQ MATS Cr op ARK. i Dt' Pago. 6 rtl REVIEW PROCEDURE '?X Administrative staff review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Applications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff member at the Community Development Department counter. at City Hall. Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications submitted after 4 PM on Thursday will be batched for processing with the following week's applications for processing. No applications will be accepted after 4 :30 PM. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded in advance to 8.5 by 11 inches. One 8.5 inch by 11 inch map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. The Planning Division and. Engineering Division will do a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 10 days of submittal. Staff will notify an applicant if additional information or copies of the submitted materials are needed. The administrative decision /public hearing typically will occur approximately' -J- days after an application is accepted as complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written decisions are issued within 10 days of public hearings. A 10 day appeal period follows all decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the tA+n.vtii't. Kim 15 '0 A basic flow diagram illustrating the review process is available from the Planning Division. The pre - application conference and the notes of the conference are intended to inform the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to development of a particular site and to allow the staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide any information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or, ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. Another pre - application conference is required if an application is to be submitted more than six months after this pre-application conference, unless is deemed unnecessary by the Planning Division. PREPARED BY: PLANUIN DIVISION PHOiThi: 639-4171 Page 7 jotpreapnon t A A •o- /l1 aA- ?OOD, Staff .� Date H7-93. CITY OF T IGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPME OJT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST The items on the checklist below are required for the successful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be brought and submitted with all other materials at the time you submit your application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call Planning at 639-4171. BASIC MATERIALS A) Application form (1 copy) B) Owner's signature /written authorization C) Title transfer instrument D) Assessor's map E) Plot or site plan F) Applicant's statement (��- --lam rt-+� ..p►aper- +t --+awt er- rr- & -ad�c - r2i0 -feet- (H) Filing fee (iii sce (4",L42. c$ect. SPECIFIC MATERIALS ITEMS TO BE INCLUDED: am" E1/101//, [ Le; C �Y L] A) Site Information showi.nc (No. of copies ," ) : [ ] 1) Vicinity hap Ci;.'. 2) Site size & dimensions ['' , 3) Contour lines (2 ft at 0--10% or 5 ft for grades > 10%) l; ►.] 4) Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds L 5) Locations of natural hazard areas including: a) Floodplain areas C ] b) Slopes in excess of 25% L ] c) Unstable ground C ] d) Areas with high seasonal water table C e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential £ ] f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils C ] 6) Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive Map inventory including: a) Wildlife habitats C ] b) Wetlands C ] 7) Other site features: a) Rock outcroppings C :i b) Trees with 6" + caliper measured 4 feet from ground level L11 8) Location of existing structures and their uses L 9) Location and type of on and off -site noise sources L 10) Location of existing utilities and easements E **1-''': 11) Location of existing dedicated right -of -ways r D) sit aevelo iTment plan showinc. (No, of copies ,�f'): L ] 1) The proposed site and surrounding properties L 2) Contour line intervals L l 3) The location, dimensions and names of all: a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways �4� and easements on the site and on adjoining L e" properties APPLICATION CHECKLIST - Page 1 ID), Proposed streets or other publ gays & easements on the site. c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed struts that require future extension 4) The location and dimension of a) Entrances and exits on the site b) Parking and circulation areas c) Loading and services areas d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation e) Outdoor common areas, f) Above around utilities 5) The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site 6) Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions 7) Sanitary sewer facilities 8) The location of areas to be hndscaped 9) The location and type of ou6uoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques 10) The location of mailboxes 11) The location of all structures and their orientation 12) Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements C) pradinm_pl.an (No, of copies ) The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1) The location and extant to which grading will take place indicating general contour lines, slope ratios and soil stabilization proposals, and time of year it is proposed to be done, 2) A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: a) Subsurface exploration 4nd geotechnical engineering report C 7 b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposals [ .) c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated C i b) Architectural brawin s (No, of copies 4o ): L ] The site development plan proposal shall. include: 1) rloor plans indicating the square footage of all structures proposed for use on —site; and 2) Typical elevation drawings of each structure, E) Lan lsca e Flan (No, of copies ): C 3 The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1) Description of the irrigation system where applicable [ „J 2) Location and height of Ponces, buffers and screenings [Pr APPLICATION CHECKLIST aw Page 2 V`, 3) Loca—on of terraces, decks, shelters' °play areas an& ommon open spaces [ ] 4) Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials. [" The landscape plan shall include a narrative which addresses: 1) Soil conditions. [ ] 2) Erosion control pleasures that will be used. [ ] F) Sicvrt Drawings Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 10,114 of the Code as part of Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building permit to construct the sign, [47 fZ (3) Traffic cleneration estimate 47/Fp -A: , " - ,.- COp [ - H) preliminar artition or lot line asljustment map showing (No. of Copies _ w,�. ) 1) The owner of the subject parcel [ ] 2) The owner's authorized agent [ ] 3) The map scale, (20,50,100 or 200 feet =1), inch north arrow and date [ ] 4) Description of parcel location and boundaries [ ] 5) Location, width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to he parcel [ ] 6) Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25 feet of all property limes [ ] 7) Location and width of all water courses C ] 3) Location of any trees with 6" or greater caliper at 4 feet above ground level [ 9) All slopes greater than 25% L ] 10) Location of existing utilities and utility easements L ] 11) For major land partition which creates a public street: a) The proposed right -of -way location and width [ ,J b) A scaled cross - section of the proposed street plus any reserve strip [ ] 12) Any applicable deed restrictions [ ] 13) Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable [ ] I) Subdivision Preliminarplat Map„and data showin (No, of Copies ) 1) Scale equaling 30,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch and limited to one phase per shoot L ] 2) The proposed name of the subdivision L ] 3) Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets [ ] 4) Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner developer, engineer, surveyer, designer, as applicable[ ] 5) Date of application [ ] 6) Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided [ 7) Names of adjacent subdivision or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of unsubdivided land [ ] 0) Contour lines related to a City - established bench- mark at 2 -foot intervals for 0-10% grades greater than 10% APPLICATION CHEMIST - Page 3 E MEV- ;cool) 5 �!! !!..5-'( NOTIFICATXON LIST 1. t,4 NPO NO. , copies 2. CITY DEPARTMENTS 41/ Building Official /Brad R. City Recorder Engineering /Chris D. Permits Coordinator /Viola G. 3. SPECIAL DISTRICTS Fire District (Pick -up box) igard Water District 8777 SW Burnham St. Tigard, OR 97223 Tualatin Valley Water District - 6501 SW Taylors Ferry Rd. Tigard, OR 97223 4. AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS Wash. Co. Land Use & Transp. 150 N. First Ave. Hillsboro, OR 97124 Brent Curtis EiiHAffi'in Martin Jcramp -Rice 4101.. e ) v Scott King - Fred Eberle Mike Borreson City of Beaverton aim Hendryx PO Box 4755 Beaverton, OR 97076 City Of King City City Manager 15300 SW 116th King City, OR 97224 City of Lake Oswego � "- City Manager 380 8W A Lake OsWego, OR 97034 state Highway Bob Doran PO Box 25412 Portland, OR 5, SPECIAL AGENCIES - _,°beneral Telephone Russ Wells 12460 SW Main St. Tigard, OR 97223 ✓ NW Natural Gas Scott Palmer 220 NW Second Ave. Portland, OR 07209 TCI Cablevieion of Oregon - . Milce Ballock 3500 SW Bond St, Portland, OR 97201 Columbia Cable (Frank Stone) • 14200 SW Brigadoon Ct. Beaverton, OR 97005 Division 97225 -0412 FOR ALL APPLICATIONSc 6. STATE AGENCIES Aeronautics Div. (ODOT) Engineer Board of H.ialth ---- Fish Fish & Wildlife Parks & Recreation Div. Subdivision Supervisor Dept, of Energy Dept, of Environ. Quality 7. FEDERAL AGENCIES Corps. of Engineers Poet Offico 8. OTHER Southern Paoifid Transportation Company - Duane M. Forney, PLS Project Engihaor 800 NW 8th Avonue, , 1t. 324, union Station Portland, OR 97209 L•� Portland General Elec. - Brian Moore 14655 SW Old Scholia Fry. Beaverton, OR 97007 Metro Area Commtinicatione Jason Hewitt Twin oaks Technology Center 1815 NW 169th Place S -6020 Beaverton, OR 97006 -4886 US West Pete Nelson 421 SW Oak St. Portland, OR 97204 arks & Recreation Board iolice 7 Field Operations School Dist No. 48 (Beaverton) Joy Pahl PO Box 200 Beaverton, OR 97075 School Dist. 23a - --- (Tigard) 13137 SW Pacific Hwy. Tigard, OR 97223 Boundary Commission 320 SW Stark Room 530 Portland, OR 97204 METRO -- 2000 SW 1st ave. Portland, OR 97201-5390 DLCD (CPA'a only) "- 1175 Court 8t. NE alem, OR 97310 -0590 ' {Other, d t7 CAF l Ll/ rtio ,amity of Durham City Manager 17160 SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd. Tigard, OR 97224 City of Portland • Planning Director 1120 SW 5th Portland, OR 97204 150T Lidwien Rahmann 9002 SE McLOnghlin Blvd. Waukie, (R 97222 DO0AMI Division of State Lands " Commerce Dept. - M.H. Park LCDC PUC Piro Marshall Other Other rr) I 01/41,1 4 �• l E_A IOOf 68, 244) 'r; (FOCeSUR4 PLAN) An' }' 2b 26 30� 44 44 Zq 0 a. .0 wu b �t 5.„A tq rza. S I'T C - A R 4 e. A : . B, lei 5�, ( LOG Atz.r_A, Co6,2.4O gyp, PA1Z,K11,1 3 en 1 aAR.5 GA.rz.Vlout • aoof /52.1V Ws) Wie7 19S i 02P4 i`y' tYJ oire .; `9512 Pr/ ) :45 bl e se l,' ' L I G `iii -'vfC7 /-- �..._.. .rte; e" Ig'i•1.Z 4 i YI$ (N01d pumaa9o11) snood bt9aw r X56 "-t'i'? .' cs,"1 91t 2S113AD -.00500 SWETT, CARL R 13485 ATWATER LANE LAKE OSWEGO OR 97034 2S113AC -00100 2S113AD -( 00 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES 15115 SW SEQUOIA PKWY #200 -WMI PORTLAND OR 97224 2S113AC -00101 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES 15115 SW SEQUOIA PKWY #200 -WM1 PORTLAND OR 97224 _______-_-__—' - ,...1 ( CR,82a 4d viuni) ever& ' - i Additual 4 ,,,, n „ c I'd r /ere /4,410Y .e,WOMW,(4444?."6// /v/44:4” MVO*/ °"~�°�,^~v�~~^''�'`'^—------8��DU��r'----^^~–' r T (42-30550 7-531 m5w wee I iii /. 777" to en Q) ni to 47 —f • N co t.p,,.,.______„._ a 0.1 It _ 6 0 s .3 / -.Ns' 1 .1*"42P , _, , _„_.__ fr9 . *'-' 1.1•4/ — —4 OD 1 I 0 4:0y, !///! ! / / / //// /!P%% +!!!/ / / /JY! /hT //%/! ✓h!////40 /! /!! / /I/..440,/,;w /hAv.. % %i! / /H ?, "„°A.//�.443,r%/ /h iii ;; ;;,,rrr. 1 palge .v..r,,,ei).liri7/il..✓ iii(% f. Wf/ J .::' // /4Y•4�'li•4%f/IA 4 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO DATE: October 19,_1222 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: BITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR93-oanjumgabilligsgLgooDs LOCATION: 16700 SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 2S1 13AD, tax lot 1700). A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 68,000 square foot grocery store, AM/CABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62.050, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, and 18.164. ZONE: C-G (General Commercial) The C-G zoning designation allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, and eating and drinking establishments among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Oct. 29, 1993. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. g ou are unable to reammUy_the above_dat24 please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: __William D'Andrea PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: IIN••••■■1.1.10.10.1.1011 We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: of our office. .tloommoweioss..1 Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: A • 1' .1. /TR/Fic- 57-0oy. NOTIFICATION LIST FOR ALL APPLICAT/OVS 1. , rLs" NPO NO. (2) copies 2. CITY DEPARTMENTS •.L Building Official /Dave 8. City Recorder Epgineering /Chris D. .s Permits Facilitator /Viola G. 3. SPECIAL DISTRICTS _Jk!: Fir© District (pick -up box) !/" Tigard Water District 0777 SW Burnham St. Tigard, OR 97223 Tualatin Valley Water District 6501 SW Taylors Ferry Rd. Tigard, OR 97223 4. AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS Mash. Co. Land Use 6 Transp. 150 N. First Ave. Hillsboro, OR 97124 Brent Curtis °"'-" Kevin Martin Mike Borreson '"'-" Scott King Fred Eberle 4,1/MN Bpi 10y City of Beaverton ""'""- Jim Hendryx - Principal Planner PO Box 4755 Beaverton, OR 97076 City of King City -"-"' City Manager 15300 SW 116th King City, OR 97224 City of Lake Oswego "`-" City Manager 390 SW A Lake Oswego, 0I 97034 0Z Otate Highway Division - Bob Doran PO BoX 25412 Portland, OR 97225 -0412 ._5. SPECIAL AGENCIES L/ General Telerhone Engineering Office PO Box 23416 Tigard, OR 97201 -3416 iV` NW Natural ban Scott Palmer 220 NW Sedond mire. Portland, OR 97209 TCI Cablevision of Oregon ---- Mike Mike Hallock 3500 SW Bond St. Portland, OR 97201 Columbia Cable (Frank Stone) 14200 SW Brig4doon Ct. Beaverton, OR 97005 6. STATE AGENCIES AeronaUtids biV. (ODOT) Division of State Landa "-" Commerce bept. - M.H. Park " Plait & Wildlife PDC Dept. of Environ. Quality 7. PEDERAL AGENCIES Cerpa.,of Engineerb Peat Offida H. O'rUER Southern Paaif'ic 5 rannportation Coiapany Duane M. Varney, BLS .. _Project Engineer 000 NW 6th AvenUe,,A. 324, Union Station Portland, OR 97209 CPO NO. Parks 6 Recreation Board ,ice Police r-Field Operations V Unified Sewerage Agency/SW Program 155 N. Firnt St. Hillsboro, OR 97124 Boundary Commission 320 SW Stark Room 530 Portland, OR 97204 METRO - GREENSPACES PROGRAM - Mel Huie (CPA's /Z0A'e) 600 NE Grand Portland, OR 97232 -2736 DLCD (CPA's /ZOA.''e ) - 1175 Court St. NE Salem, OR 97310 -0590 YsA • f: w«� .. 1 Other , ,,(City of Durham City Manager PO Box 23483-3483 Tigard, OR 97224 City of Portland -" Planning Director 1120 SW 5th Portland, OR 97204 tejL7ODOT Lidwien Rebmann 9002 8E McLoughlin Blvd. �,- ,�Milwaukie, OR 97222 J y. „City of Tw 1atin PO Box 369 TUalatin, OR 97062 / Portland General Eled, Brian Moore 14655 SW Old Scholia Fry, Beaverton, OR 97007 Metro Area Communications Jason Hewitt Twin oaks Technology Center 1815 NW 169th Piece 5H -6020 Beaverton, OR 4d006 -4556 Utl Went ---- Pete Pete Nelsen 421 SW oak st. Portland, OR 97204 Tri -Mot Transit bev. " Kira Kn0X 4012 Og llth AVe. Portland, On 91202 DOG11MI ..__ -. OTHER • 4' • MACKENZIE ENGINEERING CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • SURVEYING 0690 SW BANCROFT STREET • PO BOX PORTLAND, OREGON 97201 -0039 • (503) January 11, 1996 City of Tigard Attention: Greg Berry 13125 SW Hall Boui°vard Tigard, OR 97223 -8199 Re: Bingham Site Development Revised Traffic Mitigation Proposal MEI Project Number 293037.04 INCORPORATED • TRANSPORTATION 69039 224-9560 • FAX (503) 228 -1285 tl SCR --93 (7 C tAA) Dear Greg: Mackenzie Engineering Incorporated (MEI) has revised the traffic mitigation proposal for the intersection of Lower Boones Ferry Road with SW 72nd Avenue and Bridgeport Road, A more detailed analysis of the intersection's signal operation and coordination with the 1 -5 interchange signals was undertaken at the request of the Oregon Department of Transportation and Washington County. Based upon these comments, several changes were made to improve the intersection operation and reduce vehicle queuing. Traffic Counts Additional traffic turning movement counts were conducted at the intersection of Lower Boones Ferry Road with the southbound I -5 ramps during the AM peak hour and at the northbound ramps for both the AM and PM peak hours. These counts are provided at the request of ODOT and have been used to reevaluate the signal progression and estimate vehicle queuing. Figures 3A and 3B present the existing traffic volumes for these and the other study area intersections. Combined traffic volumes are presented in Figures 9A and 9B which include existing traffic, background growth at 3,5% for one year, traffic from two in- process projects, and. the Bingham site traffic. Crosswalks Some concerns were raised by ODOT about the crosswalk on the east side of the intersection not being provided with adequate crossing time and being operated with conflicting southbound left turns. MEI proposed running the east crosswalk with northbound traffic only, which would require an additional 7 seconds of green time for the northbound phase. The additional green time would need to be taken from the prior southbound phase, subsequent westbound phase, or a combination of the twos The net result would be some disruption of progression on the coordinated signal system. Traffic counts conducted by MEI in November 1995 indicated that only one pedestrian used this crosswalk during the AM peak hour and five pedestrians wed it during the PM peak hour, indicating that a maximum of five out of 47 signal cycles per hour would be disrupted. Mitigation measures for the intersection proposed in 1993 by MET included removal of the east crosswalk. At that time, TriMet was opposed to the crosswalk removal because of morning pedestrians walking from the park-and -ride lot on the north side of Lower Boones Ferry Road to the south lot to PAW'PDAT/06- 01103031,04\11L1.sK p bt , ti �r. Greg Berry Project Number 293037.04 January 11, 1996 Page 2 catch buses, TriMet is now picking up passengers at the north lot, which has significantly reduced the number of pedestrians crossing Boones Ferry in the morning. Evening buses have always dropped off passengers at the north lot. Both ODOT and TriMet have indicated a willingness to allow removal of the east crosswalk. A crosswalk is provided 140 feet to the east at the 1 -5 southbound ramp for crossing Lower Boones Ferry Road. Removing the crosswalk is not necessary to implement MEl's recommended phasing and timing for the 72nd Avenue intersection, but it will provide additional capacity and eliminate the need for disrupting the signal progression. ODOT has indicated that the two remaining north and west crosswalks could utilize two signal phases to provide adequate crossing times. The proposed phasing and progression would allow this to occur, Progression Analysis The current signal coordination plan for the intersections of Lower Boones Ferry Road with SW 72nd Avenue and the 1 -5 interchange was reevaluated. Passer software was used to determine if a better coordination plan could be implemented. The findings indicated that a slightly longer cycle length of 80 to 85 seconds and a band speed of 35 mph would work with the same phasing as is currently being utilized, Capacity analysis calculations using HCS software revealed that the intersections would, in fact, not work as well as the existing coordination. Field observations revealed good progression at the three intersections except for eastbound traffic between 72nd Avenue and the southbound ramps. The current operation provides an additional eight seconds of green time if vehicles are detected in either turn lane, The outside left turn lane is underutilized which causes the left turns in the inside lane to require the additional eight seconds. Reducing this time would improve eastbound operation, but would cause some additional queuing in the westbound left turn lanes. This would also cause motorists to distribute more evenly in the two lanes. Releasing the eastbound traffic earlier would cause it to arrive at the northbound signal just prior to the green light. MEI continues to recommend maintaining the existing coordination plan with some adjustments to the 72nd Avenue intersection phasing and timing. Figures 10A - 10C present the time -space diagrams for the existing and proposed AM and PM signal progression. The AM operation differs from the PM in that it provides an additional four seconds of green time for the heavier AM westbound traffic. The northbound and eastbound phases are reduced by two seconds each. This provides two seconds for the queue to clear before the progressed platoon arrives, and extends the green time for an additional two seconds. MEI recommends operation of the westbound right turn lane as an overlap during the southbound phase. This will improve the capacity of the right turn lane and reduce the required queuing. Capacity of the F:\WrDATA\96- 0110037.041111,1,8KC • 1 Greg Berry Project Number 293037.04 January 11, 1996 Page 3 right turn lane would be somewhat less without the overlap and queues would be longer, A high number of right turns on red would be expected without the overlap. Capacity Analysis Capacity calculations were conducted for the existing and proposed signal progression using HCS software, Results are presented in the table below, All intersections are expected to operate at acceptable levels of service with the proposed progression and timing, with the exception of the northbound ramp intersection. With the future AMC peak hour volumes and existing geometry and timing, westbound through traffic will be just above capacity, and northbound left turns will be nearly 30% above capacity. These capacity constraints will occur regardless of development on the Bingham site. This can be mitigated by providing two northbound left turn lanes and increasing the westbound green time by three seconds, This time would be taken from the eastbound left turn movement. Both the AM and PM operation would benefit from the timing change, Results of the capacity analysis for this improvement are presented in the table below. Table 1 Intersection Capacity and Level of Service Future Traffic Volumes Intersection Time Period Scenario Existing Configuration Proposed Configuration Proposed 4- NB Ramp C Boones Ferry/ SW 72nd Avenue AM 0,79 - 1,6.8 -C 0,61- 13.8 -B 0.61- 13.8 -C PM >1.0 -F 0.8149,2 -C 0.81- 19.2 -C Boones Ferry / Southbound Ramps AM 0,61- 12.0 -B 0,77 - 19.8 -C 0.6112.0 -13 0.7749,8 -C 0.6142.0 -B� 0.77- 19,8 -C PM Boones Ferry/ Northbound Ramps AM > 1.0 -F >1.0-F 0.77 - 16.8 -C PM 0,84 - 16,6 -C 0.84 - 16.6 -C 0.80- 14.6 -B Vehicle Queuing The anticipated queue lengths at the 72nd Avenue and southbound ramp intersections were checked to ensure that vehicles would not block the intersection operation as is currently occurring at 72nd Avenue with southbound traffic. Table 2 below summarizes the queuing with existing operation and the proposed changes at the 72nd Avenue intersection. FAWPDATA196- 0193Of7.0411L 1,SK bib Greg Berry Project Number 293037.04 January 11, 1996 Page 4 Table 2 Vehicle Queuing Calculation Summary Future Traffic Volumes Intersection Direction Scenario Existing Configuration Proposed Configuration AM PM AM PM r Boones Ferry/ SW 72nd Avenue W13 100 100 150 125 El, 100 125 _ 100 150 150 75 75 Boones Ferry/ Southbound Ramps WB LT 75 150 150 EB TAI 250 400 250 100 150 100 Queuing calculations assume operation of all phases at each intersection, maximum green time for westbound left turns at the southbound ramp, queues cleat during each phase, and 50% of right turns arriving at a red light turn right on the red light. All calculations were rounded to the nearest 25 feet. As the table indicates, the proposed configuration will increase westbound queues at 72nd Avenue slightly, and will decrease eastbound queues at the southbound ramp. Calculations are attached. I hope; this additional analysis addresses the concerns of the City of Tigard, ODOT, and Washington County. if you have any additional questions or concerns, please call me. Brent Ahrend BTA/sk Enclosures c; Lans Stout, Dave Larson - MET Allan Troyer, Marty Jcnsvold y ODOT Tom Wolch Washington County rOPDATA\ O1\91o37.ti41 oast. • 001"k VOCb 3. m • • • .. Lower Boones Ferry Road t • Not to Scale 111.11.01•1110N 10•••••■••••••••••■••••■•■•••■M■11. • DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED BY: BTA DATE: JOB NUMBER: 293037.04 SHEET OF (t.) MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ateidloi■tiLititmlocaUistio Di 01i11/96 itg11 FIGURE 1 • EXISTING LANE CONFIGURATIONS MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED cm! Structural • Transportation 0690 S, W, Bancroft Street e P.O. Sox 69039 Portland, Oregon 91201-0035 Phone: (503)224-5560 6 FAX: (503).1'.28-1265 101.0 • A • anua? V PAL A$ RA/91 -N- Lower Boones Ferry Road • 40 Not to Scale FIGURE 2 DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED BY: BTA DATE: JOB NUMBER: 293037,04 SHEET OF © MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 0301714VRAt1ltAlithavrtivt1 bM iIi, 14.10 1100 • PAOPOSED LANE CONFIGURATIONS MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED CIVII • Structural � Tronsportofton 0690 S. W. Sohoroff Street • P.0. 13ox 69039 Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 Phohe: (503)224-9560 • PAX: (503)228-1285 • ^ - • , 9i3Z1-9U(U) o96— z(o) :01-101-1d 600-10Z,46 t.4o6e.J0 opupipoci 6069 xoe '0'4 • 10041S UPAOLIPfil 'M 'S 0690 uoilopodsuP.41, • io.mon.13$ • No 031.V80c1800NI ONI833NION3 31ZN:DIOVIA1 woH OkJdVELL ONLISIXB 4 NTT OKI 96/6040 4111 041P0441:0\11A,W041410a COAOSBLI S.LHOW 11V 5661 QUI4iO4:100NI f)NIONIOND 31ZN>I0Vri LP) .J0 ,.HS ZO'L.5:0C64:?J3EihrlN ElOr ‘1,C 380.1.00 V.I.GI :A8 03>103H0 81W :AEI NAMal0 VC punou '3U "--"P" •••••.* g 41,Z a gZi7 N".-6 t --"P" C4,2 —0.• •■—•-14g 661 —4.- 019 4,* t P Ga 0 0) MVOS 01 ION vt. Z1 t ( tt 11- 138 ‘'\ QD CT) 0 nh N t oo oo .11L'" 233 441— -0— 287 A-- 426 t CC) •ch 111 CNI LI") ..• 0 he) 4—• N he) 840-4.- 275—* 314.-4/ 4— 545 1246—e- A-- 530 DRAWN BY: DME3 CHECKED BY: BTA DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1995 JOB NUMBER: 293037.02 SHI.,;.T OF Ca) MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 93c37ct4NcivitAttint3 tt.1W6 Did ci/o9/0/1 1610 ittilo FIGURE 3B EXISTING TRArmc Pm PEAK HOUIR MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED civil • Structural 6 Transportation 0690 S. W. Bancroft 51 ref 1 P.O. Box 69039 Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 Phohe: (503)224-9560 � FAX: (503)226-1285 • 111111111111 p0'. • . • N 'A, 7—* tb 21 7 17 20-- 8 --.6, N')0'' ---• 31 �--- 15 8—* 26—* 4--° 29 ',\„1,_o t, 4A DRAWN BY: DM9 CHECKED BY: BTA DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1995 JOB NUMBER :293037.02 SHEET OF M1995 ALL R GHIS RESERVED INCORPORATED Ler3ovoAcnniAzInti4Alvd 1 0i49 /9 You WO BACKGROUND TRAFFIC GFIOVVTH 3.5% AM PEAK HOUR I'viACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Clvff • Structural ; TrarisiortatIon 0690 5. W. 9anaraft Street • P.O. Box 69039 Portland, Oregon 97201 -0039 Phan©: (503)224 -9560 a FAX: (503)228 -1285 • • ' • • • r • 8 NOT TO SCALE Durham Road • almor-,Polgrategmeerrommegoo' 0 " I FIGURE 4B DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED BY: BTA DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1995 JOB NUMBER: 293037,02 SHEET or © MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ki4o3,04‘tiVtriAolirG4Whid Did otio9iii4 it $od BACKGROUND TRAFFIC GROWTH GM PM PEAK HOUR MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Civil • Structural • Transportation 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street • P.O. Box 69039 Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 Phone: (503)224-9560 a FAX: (S03)228-1285 4.44•••*4.••■•■■•.....4.-.••••4**44•••••4■■••••••••.•••••*.......4*.41•4444 ; . • :1! NOT TO SCALE Durhom Rood 21-x,, t\ t 107 5 ... --.. 45 13--4' 18 •4 -- 96 8 `„ 5 * .--- -- 24 t\ t (NI DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED BY: BTA DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1995 JOB NUMBER: 293037.02 SHEET OF © MACKENZIE r „NDINE.ERING INCOVORA1Eti 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 03704W4V11.r03/M„ L i011 O1/09/96+ ISO i,i oo FIGURE 5A 1N-PROCESS TRAFFIC AM PEAK HOUR MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Civil • Structural « Transportation 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street 4 P.0. Box 69039 Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 Phone; (503)224-+9560 • PAX: (503)228-1285 : • NOT no SCALE Durham Ro d FIGURE 5B DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED EN: BTA DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1995 JOB NUMBER: 293037,02 SHEET OF MACKEN 1995 ALL RICHTS RES 293437(1•OttIVLIA037F6.11/.11WG 14 01/09116 15i4 111.00 ZIE ENDINEERINC INCORPORATED ED sremuestomansuromeimumilitammicionommialwii IN-PROCESS TRAFFIC PM PEAK HOUR MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED civil • Structural 0 Transportation 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street to P.O. 8ox 69039 Porflarlds Oregon 97201-0039 Phone: (S03)224-9560 • FAX (503)228-1285 • • • 235-4 11\ t 0 0) In In N c1/41 • NOT TO SCALE Durham Road 0) co (NI \t4 738 225-0. 4-- 251 609-0. 5 AC' 489 255—.4,, '*\ t ( C•1 CD 00 0 PO P"- h••■ r- "t '4-1000 440 11•1•1/11.10.1101.011.1M..1•1■1•11101. 238- 788-4- -*-- 879 ( a) to FIGURE 6A DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED BY: B TA DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1995 JOB NUMBER: 293037.02 SHEET OF © MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 1905 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ejo411704■Ittv:11.q14-66A.9149 Ni t Wit19/5.1, 1646 111.09 BASE 1906 TRAFFIC AM PEAK HOUR MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Civil 6 Structural o Trunsportaticri 0690 S, W. Bancroft Street • P.O. tiex 69039 Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 Phone: (503)224-9560 • FAX: (503)228-1285 •■•••■■■••.....** . • , 44 ON L1) �D in t7) Z6- ;). rt*7) tr.) \ik 266 494—* .4— 299 2 •.-- 441 tt FIGURE 6B DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED BY: BTA DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1995 JOB NUMBER: 293037.02 SHEET OE © MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED t9301704■tiVIS0171,Geti.VG 1)(43 ttittil/96 it43, 14.00 A BASE 1996 TRAFFIC PM PEAK HOUR MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Civil � Structural • Transportation 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street * P.O. 8ox 69039 Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 Phone: (503)224-0560 • PAX: (503)228-1285 ••••••** • • •••■••••■■•••••■•••*. ' n, • NOT TO SCALE el•WRIMIM.,••••■••■•■•■• Durham Road 10 1.0 in in © 55 40-4. 15--„, • 0 0 0 0 t.) 2 25--* 40 15-3- 15 imanunlimearsommumesremumeaseueveresreimmr4 Nem FIGURE 7A DE <00 6 DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED BY: B TA DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1995 JOB NUMBER: 293037.02 SHEET OF MACKCNZIE ENOINEMINO INCORPORATtO 1905 ALL NIGHTS REStriVED IL'926370.4NC11/11.■1737F01A1140 Cri1091'96 150 11/,40 'TRIP DISTRIBUTION - NEW TRIPS AM PEAK HOUR MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Structtvol Transportation 0690 S. W. 8anaroft Street • P.O. 15ox 69035 Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 Phone: (503)224-9550 • rAX: (503)228-1285 ' , , • .6 • I' • , • DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED BY: BTA DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1995 JOB NUMBER: 293037.02 SHEET OF © MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 1995 All RIGHTS RESERVED FIGURE 7B 03o3M'kciVILVOI1FaveNd 0110006 !Nit 1.1.00 TRIP DISTRIBUTION — NEW TRIPS PM PEAK HOUR MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Civil � Structural is Transportation 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street • P.O. sox 69039 Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 Phone: (503)224-9560 • FAX: (503)228-1285 \ • 1 , • t • a • o P. N 5 FIGURE 7C DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED BY: BTA DATE: OCTOBER 51, 1995 JOB NUMBER: 293037.02 SHEET OE © MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED et3a3701M1Vt1.4417r'tn.bidt ! 01/09/96 1519 i4i4li TRIP DISTRIBUTION PASS -BY TRIPS AM PEAK HOUR MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Civil • Sfructurdl d Transportation 0590 SP W. E3arrcroft Sfreef * Box 69039 Porfldnd, Oregon 97201 -0039 phone« (503)224.9560 * FAX: (503)228-1285 0,i FIGURE 7D DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED BY: BTA DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1995 JOB NUMBER: 293037,02 SHEET OF MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED E9203704∎C1VTLA 7FODDHG 0/411 of/09i% fro f +1A3 TRIP DISTRIBUTION — PASS-8Y TRIPS PM PEAK HOUR MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Civil • Slructurcyl • Transportation 0690 S. W. Orancroft Street 6 P.C. Box 69039 Portland Oregon 91211 -0039 Phone: (503)224 -9560 FAX: (503)228 -1285 • • .9 ' , • NOT TO SCALE Durham Rood 15—s- 15 •••••••■••••••••••••••••••••••••■..... 10 ---** 5 FIGURE 7E DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED BY: BTA DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1995 JOB NUMBER: 293037,02 SHEET Or © MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED t93037t4kCiVIL\037td7.ING 1:10421 01/09196 iSee 1.1.00 TRIP DISTRIBUTION — DIVERTED LINK TRIPS AM PEAK HOUR MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED civil Structural e Transportation 0690 S. W. tkincroft Street 41 P.O. BOX 69039 Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 Ph, tie: (503)224-9560 PAX: (505)228-1285 1.....*•99•9•9. •••■••■•••••••••••* • 15 —4- 15-* 15 10--1 5 .4.••••■••. t le 5 FIGURE 7F DRAWN BY: MB CHECKED BY: BTA DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1995 JOB NUMBER: 293037.02 SHEET or © MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 1995 ALL PICHTS RESERVED t93i11704 \thelLS1137r9V.13WG X4 01i09t5Str 1523 14.00 trowiwasisuisloreeramoi TRIP DISTRIBUTION - DIVERTED LINK TRIPS PKil PEAK HOUR MACKENZIE ENGINEERINO INCORPORATED cm! Struoturcil Transportation 0690 Si W. banerott Street 6 P.O. box 69035 Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 Phone: (505)224-9560 • rAX: (503)228-1285 "e. NOT TO SCALE Durham Rood B SITE -- 4 25 (1)—*. -.. (1) 8--s. "°-*. . — (1) 4,k cn u FIGURE 8A DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED BY: BTA DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1995 JOB NUMBER: 293037.02 SHEET OF MACKrN2IE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED TOTAL Trip ASSIGNMENT AM PEAK HOUR MACKENZIE. ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Civil Structural o T'ransportatton 0590 S. W. Bancroft Street • P.O. Box 69039 Portland Oregon 97201 -0039 Phone: (5O3)224µ9560 M PAXz (503)228 --1285 r 7WkCIVIL' 1737FG06.0i4G DHI O1164/% 1h.30 • • • k • • •i 1. • • t. , . . 0) V) 12 18 42 ..1) N) C'4 ct ‘4‘ 21 85 •,..h in .4- N co 80 (4) (7) NOT TO SCALE Durham Road FIGURE 8B DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED BY: B TA DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1995 JOB NUMBER: 293037.02 SHEET OF © MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 1095 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED e93017o4c.tVIL \027FGeabWG DIG Ciiitr9i9t, 1541 WAG TOTAL TRIP ASSIGNMENT PM PEAK HOUR MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Civil • Structural • Transportation 0600 S. W. Bancroft Street • P.O. Box 69039 Poriland Oregon 97201-0039 Phone: (503)224-9560 • FAX: (503)228.-1285 Wacimemes. • • ' • ' a • 40 3 238 --et, (-1) C) 224 —4. 16.-4** .4- co c.1 5 4 141 LO tr) to op 3 3 8 cr) ▪ 4 • 17 00 hr) teJ CN1 11 "tt • , • ' io NOT TO SCALE 2m Rood NN, SITE r.. 763 250 488 617 259 0 .44 •zr 1 244 4—'1018 790 440 4-- 885 FIGURE 9A DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED BY: 81A DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1995 JOB NUMBER: 2@3037,02 SHEET OF ©MADI(NZIE ENCINFIRINC INCORPORATED 1995 ALE RIGHTS RESERVED to9303704SztViL‘altrtt9ADVt1 :14s bil1r0/06 i541 tIi DE a ASSINIIM046111,114112110101.1.1110,111.11111111 COMBINED ThAPPIC AM PEAK HOUR MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED CM' � Structural * Transportation 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street P.O. Box 69039 Portland. Oregon 97201-0059 Phorie: (503)224-9560 • FAX: (503)228-1285 • .„. , • r. • 0, 44__v 10 276 0 0 In lf) 0 •••••••••••••71.1.13.1 co ( r- CO N CD 29» 346 488-'- 295 2 434 t 11 N 03 t-f.: • • 10'17 -4-- 630 369 —.4, 549 DRAWN BY: DMB CHECKED BY: BTA DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1995 JOB NUMBER: 293037.02 SHEET OF MACKNZIE tNOINalliNO INCORPONATM 1095 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 930104 \ttVIL\037FGOLD100 0411 01/09/96 iD14 FIGURE 9B • • COMBINED TFIAPFIC PM PEAK HOUR MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Civil * Structural e Transportation 0G90 S. W ancroft Streof • P10. Box 69059 Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 Phone: (503)224-9560 • rAX : (503)228-1285 L.1**••••••4•••••4 ••••••■.••••••• '1 • •. 180' 150" 1E,0" 90" cr) • I' 60" 30" ...•••••••••• 72nd Ave 17 17" r 23 44. 19 N • • • • • • ' ' Southbound Ramp #11111111111111111111111 4 111111 17" 23' 19" 2 244‘ 23 • /1- N • '1•"'"' 250' ••••••• .11.01 Air •••••••••••••••P•••••••'•P•.••P••••P••.•••■•••••.•.••••••.•••••••PP SCALE 1"=80' 76" CYCLE TIME 30 MPH SPEED 23" WESTBEUND 28" EASTBOUND wourdemploweramestnausaamommenswommereneasommusists • • . 4 • • • •• Northbound Ramp [',-1.12.31111111111111111111111111111111111111111, TIME :D FIND MUND 545' rociamesimam.mormairmommemozros. • 1••■•••••••••••••■■••••••••••••••••••••••,••••••••••••••••••..... DRAWN 8'1• DM8 4t7 g 28'4. 244e. 24" 4.4- 28 "4 24'115 24" 4- -4? 44.4•44......444,444.4...........„4,4.44.44.4.44444.44.444............44.......,44.44444.444.4.444.4a4V14.°.... j CHECKED BY: STA DATE: JANUARY 10, 1996 JOB NUMBER:293037.04 SHEET OF 10 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED AMMASAtiMSE/MVILSINI WWW Orin FIGURE 10C PROPOSED PROGRESSION PM PEAK WITH /2ND AVE PHASING ADJUSTMENT MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Mit Structural • Tram.portatton 0690 S. W ancraft Street • P.O. 8ox 89039 Portlarki, Orogori 97201-0055 Phone: (503)224-9560 • PAX: (503)228-1285 A \CIVIL 1or RIM 17.3.89 Ir. 162.54 olv 0 WV PP GAt3 0 8" GATE VA ear....ro 4,4 OPP <4. Opp ASPHALT PARKING <alealertsoma. .214■4.. -1,..144.440.4,7 64,4,444,44.444.444444,1040444.44rnr4444.5.4544f4 V.,14,ver.rava.a,sa S8941000" E 614.55' r t,11. manta. G tr,-..a-a,avnta,scw -v 0.0 -4,,,e1,4T1/00,4 *ormonaNiumminauta Nomaimmoalionna maim 5 Noy iiimemiltdi, lEx.:170.50 0 PP C; PP 0 V: ti lEtA173,10 ,m.""'"'"""""""r"'""*""""N"."*"'"""N""...........„., "*. "1:1 6 • 175 , 30' IE=171.05 6" 0 2.0% E=1 72.00 SDR 93-17 20 OF 43 • ST.MH RIM 175.90 1E 17C.30 (COT AS-MILT) CI3 RIM 175,15 IE 172.30 M=176.56 IE=174.00 • v 2.0% 116 6 O2,0% FP-178,50 6" FW 6" 0 2,0% - MIN. IE=17▪ 4.30 CB IE=172.15 VM.r. 0.11 0* ON PP G S21140" 1 W • 1 1 16.1' 1E0072,20 8' 02,07 IE=174,00 6 q, 2.0% 170 177 Lo 0 LP LIJ z LLJ IE=173.25 aal 73.10 IE=175,10 6" FW 6• GATE VA 0 -7 (\I IE=17/5.75 NANuNNmIN NNN NNEINNENUMNN I NNANINAENQ NAI aM i Mwu 1 N11I1N1111fima1I1 1a11M 1n1M# Ne; a0n w 1l N1I i 1 1 MMUNNNn Mi1 r NIN NM ON 4 .11r N 5 1. IRU IUU ISN INN NS 11 • • Il® immism 11115555 NI55555 ININNINN lMINNN 111 IN NE NI IE=175.35 1 C: = • lEm---176‘ • =1 . 6 76.00 oRY ;.11/= • 8" GAT ALVE l'6" GAT VALVE -A GRAPHIC SCALE 120 VOW 0 0 PP UNI 1111D NIMIMP/MINMMIIMMINIONONIONAMINMEN1.111111.1111.1.111.111111•1111.11111.1111 .10 S8937'00%, 234.81' IP THIS DOCUMENT /S LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THt ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. PP 0 11 ft-1G 11 irfrj"ItTI 1 I I 1 1 I 1 T I I 1 1 T I I 1 6 1 j r 111111in 10 I I 11 I 12 ( IN FEET ) 11mhO ft., 11111111111111111 C 11111111Fi111111i1 P4030 P GRAPHIC SCALE 120 LEGEND ( IT= ) 1 inch = 30 ft- * DOWNSPOUT • CATCH BASIN (4) MANHOLE STORMLINE WATER LINE SANITARY SEWER CLEAN OUT VALVE 11111111111MIMM="="1106.311,1911 01 FIRE HYDRANT MECHANICAL JOINT 1# THRUST BLOCK DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 1/24/96 5pt6t4S5P 214/ P9c/ ENGINEERING INCORPORATED z w 1.= 400 PROP 46 OINO '447. 15,504 44) ORG 25 4/k KOi'k EXPIRES: 6 DATE: 97 DRAWN BY: MAP\SAS CHECKED BY DGL REVISION EDITION CLOSING °MTh ett mAcittratn ENGINEERING INC. 1903, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED THESE DRAWING ARE THE PROPERTY Dr MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INC. (M.E.I.) AND ARE NOT TO DE USED OR REPRO-. DUCED IN ANY MANNER, EXCF.PT WITH 111E PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION Cr SHEET SD3 OF JOB NO 293037 13111111111141111111111 ) 14111111111 . 111111'1111f1111111111. 111111111I1111111111?11111111 - $:) • SDR 93-17 21 0F43 RIM 173.89 1E 162.54 STAN RIM 175,99 IE 170.30 (�T AS -BUI1.3) 08 RIM 175.15 IE 172.30 U g 30' DR'WY 0 W/MH wit,o4 0 0 414 4,..40,1 30' 45' b Bo 0 b 0 W/MI 7 0 HYOT PP ASPHALT .",4444.4444,....444444-74.-40.4444.44444.44.4% OPP PAWING S891 0'00"E 614.55' .4,.4,,4411/.1,11,14,, .444441.-1.-44,4"-4444.4,, ..4.'44..44,4,.....44r..slr4u.,40r.W-44.44.W444.4o.44.4.4.44.44,444rt.te44t.tlu,,,k,,,,,-44 PP PP r-oo:=two-oioo.-o -..-..-"---'7ir""-:r-"""---""rr---o--''''"'"'"''* .1" .7."11211"7"1""Wi.""e"""=-- I. ., ----'' 41."**-*"......-""."' --". 11 s -i"""""""."."""" ' 3.: ..„......„....,....,„,,,w...44.0-,............".10,40.0.,...............L.-....1,,"'""7" NN:s, ....44.................................9,444,0.00.0.0444.4.40001001.0,, 4044111111101111111 1111111111111111111111M11111111111111111111111111 MINN 111111111111r111111111iiiiiiiiiillilliiiiiiiirS 1 2" HP , ,. .... 1741.„) 17r ..........„,....,,,.....,..... .7.4144.46,441444.44.440.4444.4 .4,44, NM 411.1. ‘.., G ,".„._ , „,,, .„,,,,,,,,,, .. t,„.„..., .rnm, ,,,,,,r , ,,,......„,,,t_,4,..,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.._,___. ...,,..,,,,,,,_ ,..„.,,,,,,....,,,,,,a „,... 0 „:„.„.....,,rz,11 ..,.,,,,_ _ ,.„.„,, i ,, ,,, „,,. --44,-, .. ,i., 6 -6t. 4 4 . 4''''''''''.'''. '''''''' t ." C ""t"'' '''''''''''''''''' '''''''''''''" 41/4"triow., .g,_ air,* igotiltP404 ,. , .,* Rirkl4M*14 4 '.!bil 14:641; :ilt:f141; 141: ,,,,..,, 4,4 74. 444.4 I. 04 " 9 IF ' \ N 1 .. ‘1,.....„.„..„....___,,, it::7,07(5- 1011:ik " 1:-' 1,4411 1,14,1„,4644.11144, oo.„,-.. - -,-*---z.,.. -„,- . .. \ ,. , i 1 VS. 7141°"11M'. 4811110'114104114014.4 $ ..- --'' .4 , 1F41; o., ,-..''''''''''' "I. °,0,444101 ...-44-4,14-4140,44,4444-4,4-4.14.4.44 ..-7044144, 4044 -..4444-',44 SD4 0 r‘ VI 4,104•04.4. I I I 1 44. 44K44". 44, - nrn 21*.11 4.4 Itt 11111111111111111111111t1111%11111111mb, ■4411111111 111110M111111111 iiiinunimunirinin a, I / I , I. I ti 1 4 tti 4. 4040 .44. ..44 %IL 111111.4. Maul 1. MR i mall MIN 4 44 1, .4..{. 0 \ 4111111111 ' N IN ailial lig ritil.. lir III \ 11111, ..,, ME alik SD4 III IIIIMININ MN. •.,. III .s, 111 II a II . .- II 111: , via \ N ill •,,, \ \ PER N,,, , Oil NM 11111 riL ill ROM UM, MIR , RIK NM 4..4 11 11 lit linigial; ..... irldIrt a am lat ttg oir 0*. PIr At .11 1 .0011•04•011.4•00 NN "- --1 gri) 1111111311111111111 1111111111111191111 ANIMIIMMON AIMMINMENwommou -411 41111111111101111111111111111111N11 111111111M11$111 MIUMMIIIINNI ANOMMEMMEMINIMMINIUMMIN MEM MIIMMIMMOIN 111111111111111111111111 1111011111111MMIKENERMINIMIlnii illEmplimill1111111111111111111111111111111 111111101111111Minemodliniumill1111191.1111 NNW 111111111111111111111r Nualuar r44,4404. tr.°. Pfpf. 4,0 N PPP PPP FF0178.50 N .0, N ,44,44 4444 r,44.4 4r* 40.4 4.4444 .01 -1 1/7 I I I I i 111111111111111 PP 44.4 44.44. c 4,4 , , ..,,, 1. , u, , _ _____ _ _ _ anuMBIummummlimii MIN air v70 179 182 187 140 r" 4 r-- 110111..1.11..40111e4.146.140,14 Aliti.V1411341111 4.41,40 , S89e37'00"W 234,81' mitommommumeuratememearmemousampulrammew IF THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. PP 0 3 177 AG> 179 7 I N -19 40510 4444. on, 044, 444, N ....4•4141n4ausamer.....14000Mul f 00 // / / / I / /I / / / / / I I / / I I / 1`11 1/1 / / /I i / / / / / / 4 / / / / / / / I / / / / A „/ / / / 47 / / / io / ////// , '4\ / / / / / / / / o2T / i / / / / / / of / / / / / if / 4 wIA4. / / /I / /, 1‘) / I' / / / / / / / . *A/ / 7 / / / / / / / ,/ , I / / / / '''" ' i ' 11 / / / /I / 1 / / / /if 11 / , / I 1 / I / 1 / / 1 1 :// 1 IV / 1 17 1: // // : /// \ \ ; /1j yol,; o//// // i/ /// /// ;i: / / /:// / // : /: 1 // j: / I : 1/ I. / 1/ r r // /1e,1 / / \ \ / // 1 / // / , / / /// // /I' I iii 1 / /// N, / i I/ # / 1 il 1 ' 'S, / / i 0 / \ ..d1 i / \\ N„.. Ar / ,„,- N. / ,,, ,- ,,,,.;. d- ,- ,s.":-%/" '' at 17171111IitirrririnrPrriTi 4 6 111 111 silareurenurrwori*imusmtc 111.1111P 1 1 P1111Triller 1.0 ' 11 Ifliffli N. olg 8 g in 1114 11111111 Jill 111111111 III, III liii III III III III liii tIll III III 1A '111111111 f1110111111111 6 8 2, 111111111 1111 11111 111111111 No.ne 11:411111'1-11f11111111111111111111111 man 1111 III IIIIIII 4 LP PP 40, 4,P (;° era '.4144.4444,444444■4, rm. 14.44 0 4.4 440, 1 N N '41 S274' 16,81' 2x2 WOOD POST AT 4' 01(C STANDARD OR BETTER 0 EQUAL ALTERNATIVE: STEEL FENCE POSTS, PLACE POSTS AT 6' 0/C MAXIMUM, FILTER FABRIC FENCE 36" WIDE ROLLS NATIVE BACKFILL- BURY BOTTOM OF FILTR MATERIAL IN 4 x6" TRENCH. MIN. FILTER FABRIC FENCE N,T.S. c) 14.1 1-- ct4 0 a,. 0) to 124 pa ,,1 0 0) ...- 0 (c) I no ...... '0' co , re) 0 o . . c z0 . ...... EE 4.-0- 13 m5", zI, ., ,.. „ 0,,4 I.Li 000,0) 1.,, jwu... ti,58.460.79:1 z (..D Et') �o a -, , I'M 0 z 2. 0 „..9 II 2 0 co C (...) • 0 ti _ < - tr• 't o ..Z.• b a a. o.. CONCRETE BLOCKS GRAVEL FILTER WIRE SCREEN 10-14;* RU/OFFDIWATER v.A.oewtaltory.#014.7417 GRAVEL FILTER FILTERED WATER INLET PROTECTION N.T.S. 7e7.":45‘ Nt•C- GC- /77 PA PsC) G 0-4- 1?.49 4104 , le 1:4'gilgill!!!!!!!: All & (P 4 ' 4 414tXtrit**41.1114.) k r4.4 tAil „,..-.• • teiplirOr 0"9a. oit) a I", •1144,44, ie, Iti-4,t • elp- . Air 411 44" s- DROP INLET W/ GRATE 2 TO 4" QUARRY SPALLS SUBGRADE REINFORCEMENT. GEOTEXTILE REQUIRED. 18" MIN, DEPTH CONTRUCTION ENTRANCE N.T.S. 544-7t4,150 E-FENCE E-INLET PROVIDE FULL WIDTH OF INGRESS/EGRESS AREA E-OTRY DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 1/24/96 z w Cl. c) 00) a) w ' >0 w Q :2 0 < 0 3D p z 0 0 0 0 0 V) 0 w tts.V' N .44,:151:504ifop.o 4 cc; ft EXPIRES: 6 ERNI DATE: DRAWN BY: BMK CHECKED BY: DGL REVISION EDITION CLOSING DATE: reo, MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INC. w I923, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED THESE DRAINING ARE THE PRG•FER OF MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INC. clA.E.I. AND ARE NOT TO BE USED OR RFP 0- DUCED IN ANY MANNER EXCEPT WITH THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF M.E.I SHEET SD4 OF JOB NO. 293037 et ■•■•■•■ * 111( o't 0 "Nw Ai , '416111killAk01%."1404.VP.01:\ 1k. ,41t, 40 4* '4 .1116 iv," Ater/ "AV "WI' /PIO r _dr i , r.."7"-r-r"" 7 ---r- -7-774F-----------,---"— _,7ir4 '-4-,-,---i--t-t-1----+-4,-"-i--"f`" -1--1*-1-, ', „ , . .44 ;/' ; . ' - ' 4_, i . , ' -,,, i 1 i 014' PLA\T TREES \D — STREET TREES (2-1/2" CAL. B&B) Acer rubrum 'Red Sunset' - Red Sunset Maple CC, SDR 93-17 22 OF 43 IF THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT ipirrirpri Trritpritr 11,1111111IIII rifoir-pitrt DOUGLAS FIR TREE COUNT TREE SIZE TOTAL SITE COUNT 4-6' 30 6-7 140 14-16' 21 TOTAL 191 TOTAL REQUIRED: 191, BASED ON 1/3 OF TOTAL REMOVED (5 7 4 BY COUNT) 0)'" A cit9 iv\ roi 73 IIIII111111111111111111111111111111111111 6MAM f• 0/ 11 ITO; — PARKING LOT TREES (2" CAL. B&B) Zelkova Serrata 'Green Vase' - Zelkova FLOWERING ACCENT TREES (2" CAL, B&B) Pyrus caiieryana 'Capital' - Capital Pear CONIFEROUS TREES (14-16') Pseudotsuga menziesii - Douglas Fir CONIFEROUS TREES (6-7') Pseudotsuga menziesii - Douglas Fir 0— CONIFEROUS TREES (4-51 Pseudotsuga menziesii - Douglas Fir EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN SHRUBS / GROUNDCOVERS .wiramp.olaj HEDGE PLANTING (5 GAL.) Ilex crenata 'Hetzli` - Japanese Holly Prunus 'Otto Luyken' - Otto Luyken Laurel LARGE ACCENT SHRUBS Myrica californica - Pacific Waxmyrtle, Cornus stoionifera Redtwig Dogwoo0 Cornus s. 'Flaviramea' - Yellowtwig Drwood LOW COLORFUL PLANTING Compact Oregon Grape - Mahonia a. 'Compacta' Kelsey Redtwig Dogwood - Cornus s. 'Kelseyi' GROUNDCOVER PLANTING SaIaI - Gaultherla shallon Kinnikinnick - Arctostaphyllos uva-ursi -- ANNUAL COLOR — SEEDED FIELDGRASS — SEEDED LAWN UHgaltAaaang 411111 11111P1 111111111 a 111111111 s 111111111 111111111 1' 111111 1)11 IIJIj1JIjt1l 1111111h1'Illlll 11 I 12 5111111111 140.30 111111111 C 1 3 T ALL NEW LANDSCAPE AREAS (WITH THE EXCEPTION SEEDED FIELDGRASS) TO BE IRRIGATED BY A FULLY AUTOMATIC UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM 514e1/' twq 800 MY! 6th Ave. Sults .327 Portland, OR 97209 Mho. (503) 222-5612 Fax: (503) 222«2283 GRAPHIC SCALE i* 00 ISO (111411M) 1 in■Oh al 30 it, U Mike Faha and Associates Landscape Architecture $■•••■■•■■■■••■•••,..1 cit) g /544 KM/ I4" !Oa.. 41■ w :4"F • ELEV&MBH [NIWJBI2 4 @IAQAff SIM UT bicIU , OR. 0. 1C/it( ►tfir VIDTIM ELEVATIJOE too IERg? OMC,„ A PROJECT FOR + BINGHAM 0EV ELO . MENT 3939 N.W. ST. HELENS PORTLAND, OREGON TEL: (503) 224 -2676 --- KtteCcsd E4TWI Me,4. SDR. 93-17 7.3 OP 41 IF THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS =ISLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO 1HL QUAL1 ? OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT iiiiiiirvizilfr[rptrop IT 1 1 111 j1 1 11 11 llll trITriTtrirririrpritpri 0 ..i lllllillllilllllll%Illui llil�lIll llii�Illi I I lllllll llli11111 IIII�IIII IIIIIIIU Illl1lfll I 11 11111111113i No.36 � •..;,«....; "411111%11111 %11111 MI A COMMERCIAL PROJECT AT • SEC of DURHAM RD and S.W. 72nd AVE TIG;:.RD, 0 SCHEME EG usil Perkowitz uth A N 9150 S.W. Picneer . Ct, Ste i Witeonvitlea, or 97070 W3/685-7350 4,6' 14, Mc, or4e/K ko&< or, riglor. VgiNtEA *r(e. EAST ELEVATION - MAJOR TENANT MICX MACA sr r3K1CK Tito. BOOKS° MUSIC .CAFE EAST ELEVATION - BORDERS, INC. A PROJECT FOR • INGHAM DEVEL oPMENT 3939 N.W. ST. HELENS PORTLAND, OREGON TEL: (503) 224 2676 SDR 93-17 24 OF 43 IF THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS TJEGII3LE THAN THIS NOTATION IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT, . . - TilEllirl lirrippirrii tifir riTtriTirpitp 1 1 6 iIJ 610 411'11 1ffritiliFt 111111111 liii lilt .11111111 8 frrI.8 win liii I 14 I I 9 1111111511 I f I 8 1111111111ell 111114 I I It 10 liii I 111111111 6 111111111 s 111111111 L 111111111 Nb.30 e 'IV I IC MHHHHH HH H HH 1I 111IZ 14 111 I tow am 111111411 A COMMERCIAL PROJECT AT • SEC of DURHAM RD and SW. 72nd AVE RE 0 Mush! Perkowitz Ruth Archikecture Planning 9150 SM. Pioneer et., Ste T WhorMile, Or 07070 $03/58154350 5-cptelkta9 -214 MI IF THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT MA ' <EN 4E ENGINEERING INCORPORATED CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • SURVEYING • TRANSPORTATION 0690 S.w, BANCROFT STREET 0 P,O. BOX 69039 PORTLAND, OREGON 97201 -0039 • (503) 224 -9560 • FAX (503) 228 -1285 April 11, 1996 City of Tigard Attention: Will D'Andrea 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-8199 Re: Bingham Site Development City File 93 -0017 MSA Project Number 293037 05 Dear Will: Enclosed are copies of drawings that reflect minor revisions to the documents approved in City File 93-0017, and recently revised administratively. These changes include: 1. Revision to the dock at the northeast corner of the north building to accommodate interior requirements and ancillary spaces for recycling and trash; 2. Addition of parallel parking on the north drive aisle to compensate for lost parking as a result of the dock area revision; 3. Adjustments to grading to improve the cut/fill relationship. None of these changes affect the building area; therefore, they meet the "minor revision" criteria of Section 18.120.070 of the Development Code. Please call if you have questions. Thank ou for your assistance. y �' Sincerely, Karl Koroch, F.E. KK/kc Enclosure c: Mack New v New & Neville Stuart Bingham, Selwyn Bingham Jr. - Bingham Construction Ed Craker MPR Architects F :\WPDATA\96- 04\93037.05 \11 L1.KC SDR 93-17 25 OF 43 402q/ 199c7 iiilliiii S 6Z 1111 ,1111 8Z 1111 IIII LZ liii IIII 9Z 1III 1111 -'9Z liii 1111 4Z IIII IIII EZ IIII IIII ZL IIII liii TB till IIII OZ iiiiIiiii BI iiI1.11Iiii1i I 8T LT 191 IIII IIII IIII 91 IIII IIII 4T 1111 IIII CS IIII 1111 LY 11111 IIII LT IIII IIII I �L H(I 1111 I 11111 8 IIII IIII IIII IIII L 1111 1111i I 8I' IIII IIII 9 IIII , till b IIII IIII £ IIII IIII Z 1111 1111111111411 IIm1m 4 - - z LiJ SDR 93-17 26 OF 43 0 0 mommanna I 0 5.00' O. I. 10.00' O. OM MOS ON IIIIIINIMINNIMINNIMI MINN NNNOMMIIIMINNINIIMIIIININN o' r,r) 0 40.00' AO, 1 63,00' 4.00' INNIINUENNW 0 CL) 401Pir 11■\ 0 0 C\1 4.00' 5,00' 24. 0 0 0 0' : 18.00' 30.00' 4.00' 0 0 00' 0 0 Lo 41.11111111111111111111K 27a .0 t) 14. taimaammaaamaworameoronammemamonawmavaime.. 6.00 0 0 111 .0 .0 .0 • .0 1 41 0 0 c\J ..„0- \-4.00' 0 0 ei 10.00' 9.00' IIIIIIIMMISIONINOMPIONI01.1111•11101011P 1.711.1011•11. .1■001•611, 1.1.14•11.. .011•1110■111 0.1100•11•111 flow•M•1000 HORIZONTAL LIMITS OF WORK (SEE VOTES 1 AND 2 15.00' 63,00' 30.00' 9.00' IUU ;IN ;:111 Mtn immommi ammo= mumour dirmunor _Am ni MNimmmil ANN • ROINSININI mumprinummImmarmelimm normilmmi mmr. rimprismorm glamor mom mum. imm4 :nommummagn mial min Nair lormi mar 41111111111111111p1MUF "II NW agar •1I ihr Mt ; WI 11 IL MN 111 IN 11111 111 1111 IN Iu ON MI MM 11 01110.1010.11114 .1111110110IMPITII (N 106.00' 160.00' FF-178.50 160.00' od cN oweermrs mar-1,011 r----- HORIZONTAL LIMITS OF WORK (SEE NOTES 1 AND 2) 0 FF=180.00 N) 29.00' 0LJ \_/ 6.00 15.50' sameasmonommosioammotoolasrmsenna Jai aolo -MATCH EXISTING SIDEWALK - , IF THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT, CN1 0 0 0 cid 1114111111;611111111111 33.75' 1 r 11111ti11-r1 TrittnitliTirt 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 1 1 r 411MIIININIONIIMIMMIMINIMMIIVONIVIWIMM10.111MMONSIM. 5.70' 1 1 1 .11111..•=1 112.00' 15 GRAPHIC SCALE IN1141111. . 1111 1111 1111 111111111 i111111■1 i1111 r1,111(11 ;11111)1 ;1Ie1 11I 1111 111111111 I111111r1.1111111i1 111111111 t I 8 111111111 'i11114 11111111 1111111;111111111111131111111114111111111t 1 11111111111111111 1111111 ( ) 1 filch .0 30 ft N.86 e 117111111111111111111?111111111fl*Iiiiil 120 KEYNOTES 1. PYLON SIGN (SEE ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS) 2. TRASH ENCLOSURE (SEE ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS) 3. COMPACTOR (SEE ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS) 4, CONSTRUCT CITY OF TIGARD CURB RETURN STYLE DRIVEWAY 5, CONSTRUCT CITY OF TIGARD PUBLIC SIDEWALK, 5' WIDE 6. OIL/WATER SEPARATOR (SEE ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS) 7. COORDINATE TRAFFIC LOOPS, CONDUIT, JUNCTION BOXES WITH PUBLIC 8. HANDICAP RAMP. SEE DETAIL 17/SD5 LE EN D 00010,1■■•••■■•■■■• EXTRUDED CURB VERTICAL CURB RETAINING WALL SITE ANALYSIS stawaromessesomormemortememen TOTAL SITE AREA: BUILDING LEASABLE AREA (NOT INCLUDING MEZZANINES): GROUND FLOOR: LANDSCAPE (INCLUDES ONLY PERVIOUS SURFACE): I3EQUIRED: PROVIDED: PEDESTRIAN LANDSCAPING/COURTYARD: PARKING: REQUIRED BY TIGARD CODE (GENERAL RETAIL): PROVIDED: STANDARD: COMPACT: HANDICAPPE.Dt TOTAL: NOTES: cL LLI F- ri) 298,319 SQ.FT. 69,265 SQ.FT. 44,748 SQ.FT. (1 5%) 52,769 SQ.FT. (17.7%) 14,190 SQ.FT. (4.8%) 187 (2.5 PER 1000 GSF) 231 (66.8%) 106 (30.6%) 9 (2.6%) 346 1. BUILDING CONTRACTOR WORK LIMITS TO INCLUDE BUILDINGS OUT TO PERIMETER, AROUND FOOTINGS FOR BUILDINGS AND RETAINING WALLS, AND TO BACK OF CURB. 2. SITE CONTRACTOR WORK LIMITS TO INCLUDE SITE GRADING AND PAVING UP TO CURB FACE AND BUILDING PERIMETERS. 3, SURVEY BY WEDDLE AND ASSOCIATES RESUBMITTED FOR PERMIT 4/11/96 5pt6-114s5P .241 MI DATE: 1/19/96 DRAWN BY: BMK CHECKED BY: KJK \LS CD ' MACKENZIE ENGINEERING N. 193 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED THESE DRAWING ARE IHE PROPERTY OF MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INC. (M.E.I.) AND ARE NUT TO BE USED OR RLPRO.- DUCED IN ANY MANNER, EXCEPT WITH THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF 14X3 rSHEET SD1 OF JOB NO. 293037 \CIVIL\037-SDLDWG Eprism TOP =177,80 BOTTOM =177.30 *mantamommmimmommmoommm III 1111 r!, IUI 'VP • • • ■ • a l� • • • Lig 7r ■ • • '44 '1, 17 .i CB M= 176.$0 177.,5 177.60 RIM= 178.90 !tip 1101111111111111 �!�i►`♦ 00 C; 17 85 TOP= 184.00 BOTTOM =183.50 CBI" Ot,lT I I ,4 S 1121,311/ "41i.1ma 11araa r® 11111 a..a■ ma u n 1 mum orr �4 sr: WIWI iirmma p ii II 411 *I'J AIN 1 7 I nI R N -O FOAM -o ONO -6" N- 1179.301 B-6" Cu M= CB . --178 179.25 H 74 TOP =177.50 E3OTTOM =1.76.00 V TOP =176.50 BOTTOM =176.00 TOP =176.50 BOTTOM =175.50 .... ..r .wA w. NON, ... I .....u.• *01111w4§1111 IMF aa:, ICSl. 1uaa Iai} MUM AIM IN I..I NI INK MINN IIra NK ir` I... INN ® m HORIZONTAL LIMITS OF WORK (SEE NOTES 1 AND 2) 77 17i1TC /G CB ts -id 178 0 17$. N 0 • !�IIrMAm1Am��rn1 impki FF 118O.00 179 35 CB M== TOP =184.40 BOTTOM =181.80 WO w. ONNOMMONINIMMONOMONOMNORONONINIONNOMONMONOONOMINNO e. pm TOP =185.40 BOTTOM=182.80 IF THIS IX CUMHNT IS LLSS L1 ThLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUt TO T'f1 QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL IOCOMEINT. -77 i liu iuluu iir 1`i 181 auauaai :I 1179.35 CB 1.0,00 CB--6" OUT RIM =179. 0779,50 O 4 178.5 FF 178.50 R �• w 40 • w M= • T M.... 1 78,001 174 178 178.0 `'�-- HORIZONTAL LIMITS OF WORK (SEE NOTES 1 AND 2) INF 17° N TOP =185.10 BOTTOM =181.50 um au TOP =186,50 BOTTOM =183.0 CB --6 0 T e YAW IP 110•01 0011 0 TOP= 180.80 BOTTOM= 180.30 TOP.-181.00 BOTTOM =179.50 7; 4 111�'�i�T 1 111111111111111911111101111 1111111 TT fla 11111111111114 Wel TITT 71717711g I, W RIRM=178.25 CB 116,00 y 1111 I I 1 � I I �f � l M I 11 M 1 10,86 a I GRAPHIC SCALE c nom) al inch 80 ft. LEGEND * EXISTING CONTOUR 179 PROPOSED CONTOUR tel PROPOSED CATCH BASIN DRYWELI. 1178.5o 1 SPOT ELEVATION - RETAINING WALL GENERAL NOTES GRADING NOTES 1. ROUGH GRADING: BRING ALL FINISH GRADES TO APPROXIMATE LEVELS INDICATED. WHERE GRADES ARE NOT OTHERWISE INDICATED, FINISH GRADES ARE TO BE THE SAME AS ADJACENT SIDEWALKS, CURBS, OR THE OBVIOUS GRADE OF ADJACENT STRUCTURE. GRADE TO UNIFORM LEVELS OR SLOPES BETWEEN POINTS WHERE GRADES ARE GIVEN. ROUND OFF SURFACES, AVOID ABRUPT CHANGES IN LEVELS. ROUGH GRADE TO ALLOW FOR DEPTH OF CONCRETE SLABS, WALKS, AND THEIR BASE COURSES. GRADE FOR PAVED DRIVES ND PAVED PARKING AREAS AS INDICATED AND SPECIFIED HEREIN, AND PRIOVIDE FOR SURFACE DRAINAGE AS SHOWN, ALLOWING FOR THICKNESS OF SURFACING MATERIAL. FINISH GRADING: AT COMPLETION OF JOB AND AFTER BACKFILL.ING BY OTHER CRAFTS HAS SEEN COMPLETED, REFILL AND COMPACT AREAS WHICH HAVE SETTLED OR ERODED TO BRING TO FINAL GRADES. GRADING TRN ROUGH GRADE OLE AT A PAVED OR LANDSCAPED AREAS: :k0.1 .1 FT. FINISH GRADE PRIOR CES: TO PLACING FINAL SURFACING: 10.03 FT. 2. EXCAVATION: EXCAVATE FOR SLABS, PAVING, AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS TO SIZES AND LEVELS SHOWN OR REQUIRED. ALLOW FOR FORM CLEARANCE AND FOR PROPER COMPACTION OF REQUIRED BACKFILLING MATERIAL. EXCAVATORS MUST COMPLY WITH O.R.S. 757.541 THROUGH 757.571; EXCAVATOR S) SHALL NOTIFY ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR LINE LOCATIONS 72 HOURS MINIMUM) PRIOR TO START OF WORK. DAMAGE TO UTILITIES SHALL BE CORRECTED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 3. EFFECTIVE EROSION CONTROL IS REQUIRED. EROSION CONTROL DEVICES MUST BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED MEETING THE D.E.Q. REQUIREMENTS. THE CITY MAY, AT ANY TIME ORDER CORRECTIVE ACTION AND STOPPAGE OF WORK TO ACCOMPLISH EFFECTIVE EROSION CONTROL. 4. EFFECTIVE DRAINAGE CONTROL IS REQUIRED. DRAINAGE SHALL BE CONTROLLED WITHIN THE WORK SITE AND SHALL BE SO ROUTED THAT ADJACENT PRIVATE PROPERTY, PUBLIC PROPERTY, AND THE RECEIVING SYSTEM ARE NOT ADVERSELY IMPACTED. THE CITY MAY, AT ANY TIME ORDER CORRECTIVE ACTION AND STOPPAGE OF WORK TO ACCOMPLISH EFFECTIVE DRAINAGE CONTRO5tptotiow Pc)/ L. ENG tr) c0 0 C4 I0 1 PO X N 0 04 ta in VP 0 M 0 QIN. In it 1.0 L ri a N TN boo W (71 v 000..11.. ''yy� tt L4.A 0 0 0 r.•..� 0 w C3 0 0 z 0 z e.ee. ct 0 FOR PERMIT 4/11/96 OPlio RIP 15,504 4. ARAN I' ,A 2;3 , teL K0?. EXPIRES: 6 97 DATE: /19/06 DRAWN BY BMK CHECKED BY: KJK /LS REVISION EDITION CLOSING DATE: rallaums Ira= nom100•01110 110.00401•00 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INC. 1993, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED THESE DRAWING ARE THE PROPERTY OF MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INC . M E.1. AND IN NOT Y ANUSED CEPT REPRO- DUCED THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF MIA. SHEET SD2 OF JOB NO, 293037 CU LI) C) 293037 \CIVIL\037- SD3.DVG 0/V 0 -0I' DT - REMOVE EXISTNG BLOW -OFF ASSEMBLY AND INSTALL 8" GV TO EXISTING 8" D,I. PIPE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OPP RIM 173,89 .-„., I CONNECT TO EXISTIN ANITARY MANHOLE • 7.03 12" HP Opp 1 IE =171.00 IE=169.90 IE=169,15 lrlrmlr rrrllmlrmo■Imr■rimimmoimamir a1. $I AN W" .- �.." ` z �+.... `'�+•+. -"r � r . „ _ r"r r.a.p.rr..ra.r r w • 07 tYI MI 0 ST.MH RIM 175.99 iE 170,30 (COT AS-- GUILT) IE =1 69.00 12" BE N 12 PERF PIPE IH • ERCOLATION TRENCH. SE DETAIL =1 4. IE= 171.85 8" STM1 6 SAN) 0 PP Pry ,-8" DOCV 6" FW IE =173,75 8" GV 8" FW 8" CV O r r MAf.Mr..Ml.r.w.,r r r w.rlw...a.w.Mrr 4, r 41 0 1.0 I dig at 0 6" r,V I I7 1r,I Ni'�I c5►� a r.j' w r /■1 I arrr' 12 "! IE =173.40 I ■■.!. \. I (l Ir MI N �E. CB ■ IE = 172.90 6" .o% aiim. IA ys m =172.44 �2 ■ • ■■��: cd min I 'I I I liii I 1 �j3 12" I ' MOM RIM 175.15 IE 1 7,2.30 Cs 12" PERF IE-- . • .00 12" 6" 0 42% IE=169.00 12" 6" 0 4.0% 172.2 1111 MIR 0 2.00 ,: .__ eir©! B r Mil IN MEN r ► " ` ; , - - ,4111111111111111111111 �. IE=175,75 IE • 177.70 / ■M Mr ��r IE= 17.86 ■/ ■/I ��r■■■ ■ f1IIImIIp1IIIiIIiIIIIII!IIIIHII[ji: I . ■ ■r ,�...nnum ■r► IMF ■rr ■l au • CB- ." OUT animalwrM aalalaffaliallaaaa r wr M.....1"...apt• w -------- wrrr.. w r w.....a..r....r,w C PP 0 6" 0 5.4% 1E172.53 1E 173,50 " FW 6" GV IE =172.00 IE= 170.23 ` IE= 173.90 IE =171.95 CB IE==173.30 i IE= 167,50 12" BEGIN 12"' ER ' IPE IN PERCOLATON TRENCH SEE DETAIL 6" 2.5% MIN, ►6lCO 14% 12" I FP- 178.50 12" PERF PIPE 0 0.0% IE =176.00 TYP. 0 LP IE= 167.50 12" Cw Iy=. IE =175.1 0 'DRYWE = 8. 5 IE IN =167.50 .IE IN =174.3 C: -6A OUT RI . =178.7 IE =176.25 E =173.45 12" I • =17 .00 IE =0177.50 TYP. IE=174.33 12" IE =175.25 IE =174.33 .1 F I 1E173.45 (12 ") BE N 12" PERF PIPE -. . IN RCOLATION TRENCH SEE ct _TAIL 16 B-6" OUT = 8.60 176.10 FF =180.00 IE =1 4.33 12" ERF PIPE 0 a.0% 12" PERF PIPE 0 0.0% OIL /WATER SEPARATOR (SEE ARCHITECTURAL -� SHEETS) CONNECT TO BUILDING SANITARY PIPE WITH 6" 0 2.0% 12" PERF PIPE 0 0.0% = =178.50 IE= 76.00 TYP. IE= 174.33 WOW T ,x) IE =176.45 IE= 174.33 12 SDR 93 -17 28 OF 43 LIVE TAP EXIST NG 1 D.I. 1E=174. (12 ") BEGIN 12" PERF PIPE IN PERCOLATION TRENCH. SEE. DETAIL __ U4ILITY EASEMENT Mr�lw.rwrlra...1.,�1.w�rMr Vii` ~a�Yrr 8" PEx6 "MJ REDUCER GRAPHIC SCALE (12" N) S3 OW ER Io PP allataaarfaidaaamilalwarmanmenalernaa a rr IF THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LI'.GXDLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THIS ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. 6u iTirsrrriftli IIII�IIII 4111'11 asatorrermomworwormunrotrearraol PP 0 ll11�111! t iffirr �uiha Illllllll uulm iill,ll,► 8" GV 1 115 IJIJI11fTFj IIIJII1[1il. li„1„ll Illg 1111111k1111t11111111 (IN r. E ) 1 Inch = 00 ft. 1111111 F . x,11 011 NO, 38 A =437' IIIIIIIII tlllIllll Iillillll �It�illi IIIIiIIII lilMl t/l li1i11111lli llJ ll LEGEND .IwK..a.Mir r r w „P DOWNSPOUT CATCH BASIN j MANHOLE STORMLINE FIRE WATER _..-- ,..�. -�... DOMESTIC WATER __- SANITARY SEWER VALVE FIRE HYDRANT MECHANICAL JOINT to THRUST BLOCK RETAINING WALL GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF TIGARD, UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY, TIGARD WATER DISTRICT, AND THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE AND UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, 2. WATERLINE MATERIAL, TO WITHIN FIVE FEET OF BUILDING: FIRE LINES: DUCTILE IRON, TYTON JOINT, CONFORMING TO AWWA C -151, CLASS 52 TEST: TEST AND STERILIZE AS REQUIRED BY TIGARD WATER DISTRICT AND UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE. 3. SANITARY SEWER MATERIALS: INTERIOR AND WITHIN 5' OF BUILDING: CAST IRON PIPE OTHER AREAS: PVC CONFORMING TO ASTM D- 3034. 4. THE WORKING DRAWINGS ARE GENERALLY DIAGRAMMATIC. THEY DO NOT SHOW EVERY OFFSET, BEND OR ELBOW REQUIRED FOR INSTALLATION IN THE SPACE PROVIDED. THEY DO NOT SHOW EVERY DIMENSION, COMPONENT PIECE, SECTION, JOINT OR FITTING REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT. ALL LOCATIONS FOR WORK SHALL BE CHECKED AND COORDINATED WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES LAYING WITHIN THE LIMITS OF EXCAVATION SHALL BE VERIFIED AS TO CONDITION, SIZE AND LOCATION BY UNCOVERING, PROVIDING SUCH IS PERMITTED BY LOCAL PUBLIC AUTHORITIES WITH JURISDICTION, BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY ENGINEER IF THERE ARE ANY DISCREPANCIES. 5. PROVIDE CLEANOUTS AS REQUIRED IN THE CURRENT UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE r CHAPTER 4, SECTION 406, AND CHAPTER 11, SECTION 1107. 6. TERMINATE (BUILDING FIRE SERVICE AT 5' FROM BUILDING. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AND CONFIRM EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. NOTIFY ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES. 8. ' EFFECTIVE EROSION CONTROL IS REQUIRED. EROSION CONTROL DEVICES MUST BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED MEETING THE D.E.Q. REQUIREMENTS. THE CITY MAY, AT ANY TIME, ORDER CORRECTIVE ACTION AND STOPPAGE OF WORK TO ACCOMPLISH EFFECTIVE EROSION CONTROL. 9. EFFECTIVE DRAINAGE CONTROL IS REQUIRED. DRAINAGE SHALL BE CONTROLLED WITHIN THE WORK SITE AND SHALL BE SO ROUTED THAT ADJACENT PRIVATE PROPERTY, PUBLIC PROPERTY, AND THE RECEIVING 'SYSTEM ARE NOT ADVERSELY IMPACTED. THE CITY MAY, AT ANY TIME ORDER 1 CORRECTIVE ACTION AND STOPPAGE OF WORK TO ACCOMPLISH EFFECTIVE DRAINAGE CONTROL. 10. UTILITIES SHOWN TERMINATE 5' FROM BUILDING, SEE PLUMBING /MECHANICAL DRAWINGS FOR CONTINUATION WITHIN BUILDING. CONFIRM LOCATIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 11. ALL DOWNSPOUTS SHOWN FROM THE BUILDING ARE CONNECTED TO THE STORM DRAIN PIPES BY 6" STORM LINES WITH 2% MINIMUM SLOPE. 12. PROVIDE DRAINAGE FROM ONSITE FIRE VAULTS TO STORM SYSTEM OR DAYLIGHT AS REQUIRED BY JURISDICTION. RESUBMflTEDFQRpEPMIT 4/11/96 s13 5R z14 P9q ENGINEERING INCORPORATED z LJ ,.,. --,0 co 0 00 csi co o i : , o - .� a. 0 fl) :L .4-' 02 0 r o a o U) • Uo as? C- p__ z c Q- 0 001 Q) >0 LU s- z z DATE: 1/1 9/96 DRAWN BY: BMK CHECKED BY: KJK,ILS REVISION EDITION CLOSING DATE: it 13 Immo" in um ow I 'A' MI' eh MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INC. 1993, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED THESE DRAWING ARE THE PROPERTY OF MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INC. ((M,E I. AND ARE NOT TO BE USED Ofi REPRO- DUCED IN ANY MANNER,. EXCEPT WITH THE PRIOR WRITTEN! PERMIS ON OF M.E.I. SHEET SD3 JOB NO. 293037 SDR93-Vi 29 OF 43 Lti MI 2 "lr..T"'"'Nat.""""'"....""j""'"W4".rtlaaXnr4O..rozo=t="ltlor.o......44OM4O=rOr......Yaaritr44aO4 ,O0 rt • a • 4o, • • SD4 oOn cz. cke Ouo, Soo 000 4", 000 boo, 101111101111 IMP* 0.4 SD4.) 1 I 1 OTO a' X 0, o, N N Uoroulhoms*ONOVA*44444 OTVOn**** NNN own aimirrmic. 4 , IF a NM • \ a a ti illIl i II Al I • I Il ,/ / 1M 1 1 ,/ I la I I/ II / I a i a I 1 a I 1 • I i I I lb, . a R a a 11 a a a a r i r / j / ! i i I 1 /1 II / N, \ 1 II 1111 / 111 a 1 / a Ii, a R 1 I 1 1 ow 1 a a I 1 , a 1 a i 1 a 1 AI 1 1 ; la Is It 1M $1 ME A a MI I 1 Ott Por N\ 44. N r I k 1 OorMr.....on,on.."."""'....*“....""""..."... • o *I.* * OA 111101111.111a oo. OA. 178 roo aI moms 1,4 o, woro oo,. 4,4 44. 175 41(10, Ns, a 174 Le. FF 178.50 N **" oOdo 0000 ---.-- 0 r* oPoot Moo woro IN, NOT Oo/O 000 Ono OO. • 44, All1111%1111116 1111111101111111111111,11,111111 11111111Mmullm111111111 /011111111111VIIINUMMIIIIMUMMIMMIS MIN 1111111.11011.11L...1 111 11111111111111111111 IN NUM IMITIM1101111111 rgimpoulmomominommoomm INN 1111111111111111111101411M Mom mmagir HUM 111111111r par or at r RI ai RI RI Ia 11111 UI RR an am ai 111111101mmillm-111111111 'Ns Nss..4 4 1 SD4 1 astalie4444.4.1404***.4414******* 0,0o. ao. Oool Otlo ooki. A* coo. ooN IF THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF' THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. r FF=180.09 40. 180 181 N N NMI IMP N N N N 0 40, 178 ts la* ow WAIPIUMVII.60* 444,44444.4444444.44.404410444444orsol 0 l000 Icloo .00000 I • N 0 \ ........._ 7 // / 1 / i / / I 1 / / / 1, I / / / / / • / / / i / / / A/ i / / / / ‘;/' / / (I / / / /// / / s'/7 /IT / //// / / / / / / / / / / ./ i / / I/ / / , '•/ // / / / / / / / , / Ill // / / / I I • y r / I / / • / "-\ ////1 / ./ //// / \ //, ////// \ //,,/ ///./ // ,e / / / /,, / // / / // i te , / it ////////i/////////://1/1:////1//// . /////7/////////////11://////12 /////1 ////// //i N \ 7-4 / /././ // // \\\ /// •••," ff", • ILTT"Tripri 171 g6g1611611161111110 TpiritTrTgrigiiiiplrfririrTigir a "aMET_RttEY_SEDjMEjlT , PURPOSE: TO REDUCE THE TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENT FROM A CONSTRUCTION SITE BY PROVIDING A TEMPORARY PHYSICAL BARRIER TO SEDIMENT AND REDUCING RUNOFF VELOCITIES. r&N,DilataltaFJ31_123.8alIQLEala, DOWN SLOPE OF DISTURBED AREAS WHERE RUNOFF MAY OCCUR AS SHEET RUNOFF. AT THE TOE OF SOIL STOCK PILES. AT INTERVALS AS INDICATED ON SHEET C5.0 ALONG THE CONTOURS OF LARGE DISTURBED AREAS. AT GRADE BREAKS EXCEEDING 2070. FOLLOWING DISCHARGE FROM A SEDIMENT TRAP OR POND. SEDIMENT FENCES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED ACROSS STREAMS. DE51,gliMIERLA 1Z5:_UEMAIEWL, SEE DETAIL 1 SHEET SD4. SELECTION OF FILTER FABRIC TENSILE AND BURSTING STRENGTH CHARACTERISTICS DEPENDS ON THE SUPPORT FENCE. FABRIC ATTACHED TO CHAIN-LINK FENCE NEED NOT POSSESS THE SAME STRENGTH AS ONE ATTACHED TO A FENCE OF 6 BY 6 INCH REINFORCING WIRE. SELECTION IS THUS BASED ON STANDARD ENGINEERING PRINCIPLES. SYNTHETIC FILTER FABRIC SHALL CONTAIN ULTRAVIOLET RAY INHIBITORS AND STABILIZERS TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF SIX MONTHS OF EXPECTED USABLE CONSTRUCTION LIFE AT A TEMPERATURE RANGE OF 07 TO 120"F. ALL MATERIALS TO BE IN GOOD PHYSICAL CONDITION TO PROVIDE PROPER SEDIMENT RETENTION. AT NO TIME SHALL MORE THAN A ONE-FOOT DEPTH OF SEDIMENT BE ALLOWED TO ACCUMULATE BEHIND A SEDIMENT FENCE. SEDIMENT SHOULD BE REMOVED OR REGRADED INTO SLOPES, AND THE SEDIMENT FENCES REPAIRED AND REESTABLISHED AS NEEDED. STORM .DJAJN INLET pR PURPOSE: TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM ENTERING STORM DRAIN SYSTEMS PRIOR TO PERMANENT STABILIZATION OF DISTURBED AREAS. • k AI. 1111 1.4 WHERE STORM DRAIN INLETS ARE OPERATIONAL BEFORE PERMANENT STABILIZATION OF THE DISTURBED DRAINAGE AREA. ADJACENT TO AND IMMEDIATELY DOWNHILL OF UTILITY TYPE CONSTRUCTION IN EXISTING PAVED AREAS WITH CATCH BASIN DRAINAGE. DEacttLsBuE:ELAAEEQuQ,,Anat„%r: SEE DETAIL 2 SHEET SD4 FOR STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION. BMAS MAY BE REQUIRED TO DIRECT DRAINAGE TO FLOW THROUOH THE FILTERS AND PREVENT BYPASSING OF THE HEM AT NO TIME SHALL MORE THAN A ONE FOOT DEPTH OF SEDIMENT BE ALLOWED TO ACCUMULATE AGAINST STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION MEASURES. SEDIMENT MUST BE REMOVED AND INLET PROTECTION MEASURES RESTORED AS NEEDED TO MAINTAIN THEIR SEDIMENT TRAPPING AND FILTERING CAPABILITY. 1911171' 1ili1111111111111111111111111it N038 2x2 WOOD POST AT 4' 01(0 STANDARD OR BETTER 0 EQUAL ALTERNATIVE; STEEL FENCE POSTS, PLACE POSTS AT 6' 0/C MAXIMUM, FILTER FABRIC FENCE - 36" WIDE ROLLS B ENGINEERING NATIVE BACKFILL- BURY BOTTOM OF FILTER MATERIAL IN 45(6" TRENCH. MIN. FILTER FABRIC FENCE -cum N.T,S. WIRE SCREEN CONCRETE BLOCKS OVERFLOW It RU/NOsFEEDImENTR rqL- WIRE SCREEN GRAVEL FILTER FILTERED WATER INLET PROTECTION N. T.S. GRAVEL FILTER 12"-24" DROP INLET W/ GRATE 0- ss • 40k :\■C''LI::::°#4:4410.nple,- • 04poprpoi "1S) firpiNico • e slew 134. dia0PilkWeigfittelii *fliteY44)16. .746b4101111;11g; AtIPP 411: tcetc fr# 2" TO 4" QUARRY SPALLS SUBGRADE REINFORCEMENT GEOTEXTILE REQUIRED. 6b, 18" MIN. DEPTH CONTRUCTION ENTRANCE N.T.S. —NLET PROVIDE FULL WIDTH OF INGRESS/EGRESS AREA E—ENTRY TR liTBANSaa aufiesaL TO REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF MUD, DIRT, ROCKS, ETC., TRANSPORTED ONTO ROADS BY MOTOR VEHICLES OR STORM WATER RUNOFF BY CONSTRUCTING A STABILIZED PAD OF GRAVEL AT ENTRANCES/EXITS TO CONSTRUCTION SITES. PRACTICe.EAP-Ma AT ANY CONSTRUCTION SITE WHERE TRAFFIC WILL BE LEAVING THE SITE AND MOVING DIRECTLY ONTO PUBLIC ROADS, OTHER PAVED AREAS, OR OTHER APPROVED ACCESS POINTS. DELTASAIIERUOTISAMMOBL SEE DETAIL 3, SHEET SD4. MATERIAL SHOULD BE 2" TO 4" QUARRY SPALLS. THE GRAVEL PAD SHALL BE AT LEAST 8 INCHES THICK AND 50 FEET IN LENGTH, WIDTH SHALL BE THE FULL WIDTH OF THE VEHICLE INGRESS AND EGRESS AREA. (A 20-FOOT MINIMUM PAD LENGTH MAY BE ACCEPTABLE AS APPROVED FOR SINGLE FAMILY AND DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION SITES.) ADDITIONAL GRAVEL MAY HAVE TO BE ADDED PERIODICALLY TO MAINTAIN PROPER FUNCTION OF THE PAD. IF THE GRAVEL PAD DOES NOT ADEQUATELY REMOVE DIRT AND MUD FROM VEHICLE WHEELS SUCH THAT MUD AND DIRT TRACKING IS EVIDENT OFF SITE ADDITIONAL MEASURES MUST BE TAKEN. SUCH MEASURES MAY INCLUDE HOSING OFF WHEELS BEFORE VEHICLES LEAVE THE SITE OR OTHER CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES/WORK OPERATIONS MODIFICATIONS, WHEEL WASHING SHOULD BE DONE ON THE GRAVEL PAD, AND WASH WATER SHOULD DRAIN THROUGH A SILT-TRAPPING STRUCTURE PRIOR TO LEAVING THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL MEASURES REQUIRED TO KEEP PUBLIC STREETS CLEAN AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER, USE SUBGRADE REINFORCEMENT GEOTEXTILE UNDER GRAVEL PADS FOR ALL BUT CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE FAMILY/DUPLEX RESIDENCE ON EXISTING LOTS OF RECORD, RESUE3MMED FOR PERMIT 4111/96 5tpteitAm, P91 .k; z 0 F— z 0 z 0 0 LU 1300% /74 8/12t 4? i5,504 kZ7: • 0),.07EGON )' 25 VIP /1- C)%s 4/h. KO$P EXPIRES: 6 30 1111 DATE 1/19/96 DRAWN BY: BMK CHECKED BY: KJK, LS REVISION EDITION CLOSING DATE: E. SHEET SD4 OF JOB NO. 293037 ft, NATIVE BACKFILL (SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS) LANDSCAPE AREA PROPOSED PAVEMENT PAVVIING SECTION PAVED AREA - --�--- -- -PAVING SECT :IoN, CRUSHED ROCK BASE OR LANDSCAPING ' ONCRETE FRAME CASING CLEANOUT FRAME AND COVER —1" 0" GRANULAR BACKFILL (SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS) 1 "--O" GRANULAR BACKFILL (SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS) SEE UTILITY PLAN FOR PIPE SIZE AND TYPE (MAIN PIPE) ----APPROVED SEWER LINE -45' WYE ELEVATION VARIES -- SEE SITE PLAN --- TOOLED JOINT 2% CROSS SLOPE CONCRETE WALK \\___ CAST IN PLACE CURB & SIDEWALK, PAVING SECTION CCMPACTED ROCK BASE TRENCH TOOLED EDGE 2" SAND OR 3/4 "--0" CR. AGG. N 41 CONCRETE TO HAVE STRENGTH OF 3000 PSI IN 28 DAYS, 2" TO 4" SLUMP *PROVIDE EXPANSION JOINTS 2O' -0" O.C. ALIGN CURB AND WALK JOINTS. 1" MIN. AS ,NOTED ON PLANS 2 CROSS SLOPE BROOM FINISH TOOLED EDGE EACH SIDE * PROVIDE CONTROL JOINTS IN WALK 0 5' - -0" O.C. CURB AND SIDEWALK COMPACTED BASE 4" CONCRETE WITH " CONTROL JOINTS AT 5'-0" O.C. AND EXPANSION JOINTS AT 20'-0" O.C. OR AS SHOWN ON PLANS. CONCRETE SIDEWALK N.T,S, MONOWALK N.T,S, NO TAPER CUR 404,40.tp.. ir""' 44t* 1 T* *te ;$4* 4$* 41.4 44440A6* 44, Am CALI CURB RAMP *DISABLED SIGNAGE PER STATE REQUIREMENT SEE DETAIL 10 /SD5, L6' TYP. 3" WIDE PAINT STRIPE TYPICAL DISABLED SYMBOL, PAINTED PER OREGON LAW SEE DETAIL 11 /SD5 PAINT STRIPE 9'- HANDICAP PAVEMENT SYMBOL N.T.S. SDI{ 93 -17 30 OP 43 STANDARD FRAME AND COVER APPROVED DRAINAGE GEOTEXTILE FOR SEPARATION. - FINISHED GRADE f.l•�sir`L: i` f • � ly: w!4rf;+voii ;1,1 1� � i�ilif, II 4117* II ' 'nairai Ngngll iC i rl Afar- DRAIN ROCK, NO. 4 GRADING FOR PORTLAND CEMENT CONC. AGGREGATE, APWA STD. SPEC, 30" THICKNESS AROUND STRUCTURE. HSYMB 1:1 N.T.S. DRAIN ROCK, NO, 4 m r lLi i7 GRADING FOR PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE ACC., APWA STD. SPECIFICATION PERFORATED PIPE, 12" DIA. PVC STD., PRECAST, HEAVY WALL DRYWELL (WITH " PERFORATED SIDES) MANHOLE SECTIONS W/48 T.D. AND 5" MINIMUM WALL THICKNESS. Nom„ OTE WELL TILE NOT ACCEPTABLE. CLEANOUT SWALK 1 :1 —PROVIDE TACTILE WARNING PER A.D.A. TAPER CURB ASPHALT CONCRETE FLUSH 4" STRIPES AT 2'-O" OC TYP. 3O' TYP. _VOTES 1. ALL DISABLED STRIPING AND SIGNAGE TO COMPLY WITH ORDINANCE ORS 447.233. 2. DISABLED SIGN TO BE MOUNTED TO SIDE FOR VAN ACCESS LOCATIONS AND MAY BE CENTERED FOR STANDARD DISABLED SPACES. MIRAF'I 140N DRAINAGE GEOTEXTILE FOR SEPARATION 1MTH 18" OVERLAP :rrr�1:-Ii!ds°r u iT; ^M NATIVE MATERIAL DRYWELL AND PERC TRENCH N.T.S. m 1' DRYWELL /V THIS DOCUMENT Is LESS LTGII3LH THAN THIS NOTATION' IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY Or THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. HSTALL1 CAST IRON TO EXTEND 4' ABOVE FINISH GRADE. 90 DEGREE SHORT TURN ELBOW HUBLESS CAST IRON WITH STAINLESS STEEL BAND, TYPICAL 45 DEGREE SHORT TURN ELBOW GRADE WALL 45' WYE CLEANOUT WITH PLUG. FLOOR SLAB SOLID GROUT AT BASE FOOTING Amt.!". SHOWN 111/014 PLANS 'N\ DOWNSPOUT N.T.S. r ,. WIDTH OF SIDEWALK SEE PLAN DIMENSION ON PLAN FINISH GRADE TAPER CURB AT SIDEWALK OR END OF CURB 4„ 8" DSPOUT1 It I tlI!.11II w Itlll -�tl . 1111=11= ;t %• " %:;a:;��:::• - "9I :II'{I �I ` f ,- It ,II`" ill.7ll` ll -I - nun SLOPE TOP OF CURB TOP OF SIDEWALK EVEN WITH PAVING RADIUS EDGE - EXTRUDED CONCRETE CURB SET IN EPDXY CEMENT -ASPHALT PAVING EXTRUDED CURB N.T,S, RUSHED ROCK BASE GEO TECH FABRIC (j BLEND 6" GRADE DIFFERENTIAL 1 1/4" STD. PIPE AT DRIVE-IN SIDE OF WALL. GUARDRAIL �-- -WEEPS 0 6' O.C. ""i".""••••••••woiu•••*•rnisi••••••iluh.=nmN•••Na.,f; . ECURB WHEEL BLOCKS. SEE DETAIL - 0- ASPHALT #4 REBAR, 18" LONG W (2) PER HEEL BLOCK. cURasrOp N.T.S. TOOLED EDGE 1/4" RADIUS 9" CAST-1N--PLACE CURB N.T.S. ROCK BASE COURSE CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE CURB NOTE: CONCRETE SHALL BE 3000 PSI AT 28 DAYS. 6 SACK MIX, SLUMP: 1 1/2" TO 3" •1 VCURB 1/4" STD. PIPE GUARDRAIL ---6" CONCRETE WALL WITH AT 1' -� " Off. EA. TOP AY k (PROVIDE (2) AND ALL EDGES AC PAVING SECTION -8" OF FREE DRAINING ROCK 0 *:f16 b RETAINING WALL ELEVATiON `_0" MIN. 2" WEEP HOLES (SCREENED) AT 6' -O" O.C. 6" VERTICAL CURB BEYOND 5 HANDICAP RAMP SECTION N.T,S, T IOI1rfr11 r "1II�I'��jIIIjI �, 1111 111 iiiiluu plllllll (III�IIII 111 14 IIIII III1III 14 III Ili�lli�111�1 IIIrfI�II1iip 6 lilt fill fill 1pl IIIl�Nil llll�llll 11111111 Illl�fill Ifll�flll 1111111 PAVING C1 I NTS a SLOPED CONCRETE RAMP I III If III IIII, f111 111t1 11111 F1 IIIjIII�I I�1 1 jj lllilli RAMP-SEC 111111111111 11111111111110 iiu1tiu 111411 4uu 1 0 #4 AT 'I' --0" 0,C. 4) #4 x CON T. tc) P6okv` 5b" �� ' o6YKa8:on o cxroer prro $11 AULK PIPE INTO HUB HINGED TRAP S" ON OR Lx 2" GRATE T AT SASE COURSE LEVELFACE AVING E[r IRIr` SE Iw. ■Ir1rl -... :. xti,�, = ._. -.rll.l.+ �,. o. nl u�1 I1 WAN' Ipli INVERT ELEVATION SLOPE AND LE. VARIES SEE PLANS CATCH BASIN N,T.S. 1/4" It STEEL ALL WELDED CONSTRUCTION. ASPHALT EMULSION COATED INSIDE AND OUT. 2 "--O" x 2' -0" (OR 24" ROUND) NOTE: 1) MIN, 2`--0" COVER ON ALL PIPE IN DRIVE AREAS. 2) LYNCH TYPE CATCH BASIN OR EQUAL .090" ALUMINUM SIGN PLATE WHITE BACKGROUND 1" HIGH BLUE LETTERS AND BORDER, BAKED ENAMEL HANDICAP SYMBOL WHITE WITH BLUE BACKGROUND ' -ON PARKING WITH DMV DISABLED PERMIT ONLY. VIOLATORS SUBJECT TO TOWING UNDER ORS 811.620 AND X15FINE UP $ 0 UNDER ORS 811.615, VAN ACCESSIBLE SIGN--4= GALVANIZED STEEL POST 1-, w z h z (0 z d HANDICAP PARKING SIGN N,T.S. 74f`o RETAINING WALL 3,-., i1111fIIlll10 e 111111111 1)111111'11 III1III11111111. pllll(ll Nb.86 v 111111111 s 111111111 511 III 1 111 11 I DRIVE - -IN 14 SD5 1 1/4" STD. PIPE GUARDRAIL JONOOOVIONOIOOPONOMOMI 0 ► '" 0 to op o 0 0 Ilf? ,0 5� w t �c 4..I, m _ awl• 0 e'en o to td • ea)a) 1. Laj s. o 0 ° tx' c�''o 4 .2 ca ©a. a. HSIGN 1;1 RETAN1NG WALL N.T.S. RESUBMITTED FOR PERMIT 4111/96 DATE: 1/19/96 DRAWN BY: BMK CHECKED BY: KJK,LS iAACKENZIE ENGINEERING INC. d 1093 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 'THESE DRAWING ARE THE PR ERTY OF M, CKENZIE ENGINEERING INC. M.E.I. AND ARE NOT TO BE USED REPRO- DUCED IN ANY MANNER EXCEPT WITH THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF M.E.L SHEET OF JOBS NO 293037 • ..0•••••••earsowor.4•••••=.111, "1. am as ."4"1 1.1 rim WO 1110..004.1101.061.41.1.1.011111104 6. le A's .4 4? 0'' XxX A >csn) X 7" F XX ( ) Xs. 8'F X et,,e x)< 4 X'S' 4 X X 1.s X it. 24" F X X 12"F xtrF X x xnuF fl-tn ' v 4 14"F' X 14F X X 3-"AL. X swim wow 1;e7... mom imast 1" F X k (s, I >k " • 13" 22"F X x 22"F X 10" F X I I x X .4 I. XX( 4 I 24" F X> J 13" F X (1, 10" F x xt1, Xx(1%/' A F 12'. 16" F X X X .4 x x X X 14"F ,\i" X 24" F ><4 x (1, e 4' A p3, 1, M X 22"F X .4 X MR 93-17 31 OF 43 lainftworwmairromrpowmosiemorogame LLJ .7_ LLJ 0 7 CN X 30" F X 18" F X 24" F „Net' X 24" F • et Ns') X X 24" F >›`<117 .4 64, X X22"F X 18'F Xx 6" F 5" DW X X X 149F X X 20" F <6"f1 X 24. F te<, X 17 ,46 X X 14" F X 2-10"DW xN(° "F X X X'\4 X X (tO X P NcS's x F 24'F 12" 26" F X 10" F X 8'F' X <4 32" F X x e 21"F X X 18" F 22"F 11F X 20" F X 18"F X 8" F X 12" X 22" r x 209F N4> X1"F X 18" F 13" 22"F 20"F X 9" F (VX 3-10"AL X 13"F 13" F x *MOO OMNI' x 10" F �I 11111i0111111Prniminut* -4 •-• 77 .4P+ 1/ X X X X „< (19' X A 4 XIS )4A N (1, X` X >< X, xe X xNe (----7-tRL-- X 10"AL X 20"F ' 1 U F A)1")‘c F x 24" F .4 XN" X 24" F X NC) X 12»F X 24" F X 20" F X 24" F X 17" F x't)C) x e (1, 12" X k,t4 9'M 26"F 26" 111111 9" 11" 1 F X II 15" F X :iaa 109F XX I 22"F • x(8 e<, 15" F X (1, 24"F X 12"F X 10" F X 12"F X X 20" F 144F X 4"F X F X 22 F ><>< 1O "F• X 16" F X ON. x 1 Er F rt'‘ 59F X X Nc) k X 189F >X 7" F X e rVA, 744F X x x ><N X \ X >< x •ND* 42 AN X 13"F x (S'` 1`9"‹.s x(5' X 28"F IAN%1111111611111 marirmomm Ampsimax .....4111151111011111111101711111111111 ANNNUNNIaai L1111111111111M111111 HMI onamtramammorRin X 15"F X 28"1, X X tx X 26 „ F Inalimaagula '11111111111111111M1111111111111111111111111HISI INN adri11111111101111111111 1.1111111111M0 al 11. Oimmummummali immummsmpia1 stuumammompammuritromm X 28"F X 12' x e X ............ 11191/11111$111111111111111111,' e 111-filmilir Q,.,, ,,,,A ,x xi, x:F18"F X 0 4) X 1 8" 1111111111111.1111nr I. Pr 1, Ili X 4.: F „,_N , 4 .c7(5,-. x ,,,,, , ,,,,, x AA X;4„ A4 z .6 „„, ,:,.. x v X Nt` .4 X/' 34" F X t. X\t''41:" F t., '''' 0<c . et X cl 1;F X -4'''' .1C, k,' 1 , A X 1 4" F I , ,) ,,x , x x x,,,,, X..9.) 20" F Xlvx,,ri, ..., 18" F X.4,xXtx/ x1\4) ,,>/` \ (1,1AP p,4,4 „< 14" F X X 1 12"F X 0) ‘ .4' rlf ''' X 14'' F X 20" F X ,1), • v 14" F X 511F X X X 22" F ><4"' x X 12" 14424" F 04 ■■%''' X 12'F 11111 • iiiRi ahammilmiarffianumumi., x fx X x 22" F X t,tA X2-8 2 -87 xx •X2 0 F x to :cs x X 12"F X 22" F X 10" F 18" F X 244V X X 20" F 14" F .4. x 1 e 18 16" 10" M 16" GRAPHIC SCALE 120 141,'F , L 04 10" M X xN° X4)(1' x X 20" F X 5" OW 7" M AMIIWINI,•••• X 12" F X 27 F X 18 x N X 6" -8" M c5"t. ><>< 4s oN‘,>` k 4, ec r x( °`A x x 14" F. I1 THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEG/ELE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT, xii"r X 3-16" F A A x x x (1, X 2Z F X 10" M oramono.. MM. 0111V767 VINO Oa' r x m 1 IF x 10" F X ' 21 itirrTicririrlifitilliji111 i111111i1 i1111111 III 1111 i111111 ;110 1e' X 10" F X 12" F 24" F 111111r1 i111111■1 111111111 i111111;i i111111iii111111i1 ti 11111111 111111111 LEGEND 1 I 1 11 1 I 1 I 1 11 1 ' I 1.1 111111111 No.36 (it Itutzt- tt111111111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 till 8 I t' HP I le I 15 I tr" ra Fur ) inch SO ft TREE PROTECTION AREAS (FIELD VERIFICATION BY ARBORIST) 11■1411.4.1....1.111.1.11,...1111 s a •I ••■■ owe ow • .••••••mor 4•140rn••••■••••••••••••404 z w C aa 0 00) L- > 0 w CD 1" z 0 4ttt p TREE PRESERVATION z CL .09 ?110%, 44,+1574*** AV Kok EXPIRES: 6 30 • DATE: 1/19/96 cD Is) (11 " MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INC. zri 1993, All RIOHTS RESERVED THESE DRAWINO ARE THE PROPERTY Of MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INC, INCGEDRFN NAVY1.1(1A18414`4, EXCEPT REPRb- WITH THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF RESUBMITTED FOR PERMIT 4111/96 5eptot4,66-12 2q, P9q SHEET SD6 293037 JOB NO. \CIVIL \O37- SDG.ING SDR 93 -17 32 OF 43 w0,. REMOVE EXISTING BLOW -OFF ASSEMBLY AN INSTALL 8 MJ GATE VALVE (5,TRADDLE BLOCK) TO EXISTING D.I. PIPE INSTALL 8" MJ 45' BENT OPP lligamwm ■....Iw.r...r..mu..al►1A 0_0_0_0 0 PP INSTALL 8 "x8" MJ T E WY 8 MJ GATE VALVE (SOU H) P'PO IN T/,LL 8" MJ x 6" FLG TEE W/ 6 FLG x MJ GATE VALVE INSTALL 8" MJ 90' BEND INSTALL 8" MJ GATE VALVE I 8" D .I. CLASS 5 INSTALL 8" MJ 90' BEND Atemswtrairlavroarromimorow saw RIM 175,99 IE 170,30 (COT AS. 43U11-1) cs RIM 175.15 IE 172,30 LEGEND FIRE WATER DOMESTIC WATER VALVE 00 FIRE HYDRANT THRUST BLOCK MECHANICAL JOINT WATERLINE CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1. AN ESTIMATED 12% OF THE WATER SYSTEM COSTS MUST BE ON DEPOSIT PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION ON WATER LINES AND TO RECEIVE A CITY OF TIGARD WATER DEPARTMENT (COTWD) STAMPED APPROVAL ON CONSTRUCTION PLANS, 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ONE SET OF COTWD STAMPED APPROVED PLANS ON THE CONSTRUCTION SITE AT ALL TIMES. 3. NOTIFY CITY OF TIGARD WATER DEPARTMENT 48 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION, TO SET UP A PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING. TELEPHONE (503) 639- -1554. 4, ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWWA STANDARDS. 5. ALL WORK WILL BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY COTWD. 6. ALL PIPE AND C� G52LL BE DUCTILE IRON, CEMENT -•- LINED. PIPE WILL SE TYTON JOINT DUCTILE IRON, 7. 36" OF 3/4" MINUS GRAVEL COVER FOR ALL MAINS IN STREETS, PAVED AREAS, AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY. 8. ALL VALVE OPERATING NUTS SHALL BE WITHIN 36" OF FINISHED GRADE, OTHERWISE VALVE OPERATING NUT EXTENSIONS WILL BE REQUIRED. 9. AT POURED CONCRETE AND BEND LO AT ION LEAST 8 SQ, FT. OF BEARING SURFACE ARE REQUIRED 10, ALL SANITARY SEWER LINES WITHIN 10 FEET LATERALLY OR 3 FEET VERTICALLY OF A WATER MAIN SHALL BE ENCASED IN A REINFORCED CONCRETE JACKET 6" THICK FOR A DISTANCE OF 10 FEET ON BOTH SIDES OF THE CROSSING, WHERE CROSSINGS ARE NECESSARY, THEY MUST BE MADE AT APPROXIMATELY 90' WITH AT LEAST 18" OF SEPARATION BELOW THE WATER LINE. 11. ALL MAINS SHALL BE TESTED AT 150 psi FOR ONE (1) HOUR WITH A MAXIMUM LOSS OF 5 psi. STATIC PRESSURE = 100 psi, 12. ALL MAINS SHALL BE CLEANED AND FLUSHED WITH POTABLE WATER PRIOR TO DISINFECTION. BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTS WILL BE TAKEN BY COTWD. 13. WATER METERS DL BES INSTALLED UPON INDIVIDUAL REQUEST AND PAYMENT BY OTHERS (OWNER). OWNER rRQ E PRESSURE EGUTOR FR 1 O ► 14. EVERY METER SHALL HAVE THE PROPER OREGON STATE APPROVED BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE VALE ASSEMBLY D TESTED BY OWNER. 1h" SERVICE REQUIRES A MINIMUM OF A DOUBLE CHECK 15. UPON COMPLETION m OF INSTALLATION OF THE WATER SYSTEM, THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER WILL ADVISE COTWD OF THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS TO WHICH WILL BE ADDED 10% FOR COTWD INSPECTIONS WATER LOSS, OVERHEAD, ADMINISTRATION, SAMPLINGS, ETC., AND 2% FOR ENGINEERING REVIEW, INCLUDING 'SAS - BUILT" DRAWINGS, UPDATING THE MASTER MAP, INTERSECTION MAPS, ETC. ENG MACK • LO I a 0 040 co EL 0 c 0 eN 0 co to a .. C s P) X • 0L v.)wc.4(O 0) • Z,5 om s2 o vp • 0 EU >ca n, 000..CL. OI.P INSTALL 8" MJ 45° BEND W/ 6� XP S�XTSAPPIN AN'_8 "FLGxMJT GAT_ VALVE LU z LU 0 z I N (1i Am um i IwIAMU ....awi� r 1IIIIIIIpUiiii!iiIIIIIIIIIIIlIIIII[ii �._ 0000 .. .� . I.....a.�».._ l! IlriIIl■ IIIII■ I •a r .I ■1 11! II INSTALL 8" MJ x 2" IPT TEE s ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATE 1652 LF 8" DI AT $32 /LF 320 LF 6" DI AT $22 LF 1 16" x 8" LIVE TAP AT $1000 /EA. 1 FIR TN T $ /E HYDRANT ASSEMBLY 18 OA. $39,648 5,760 1,000 250 9,000 TOTAL: $55,658 ENGINEER'S BID ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR'S BID (ESTIMATED) TWD (12% ADMIN., OVERHEAD, ENGINEERING) ENGINEERING (6%) $55,658 8,419 +x,209 iii TOTAL: $65,266 DATE: 3/25/96 DRAWN BY: EMK CHECKED BY KJK 6TEE.L PPING INSTA ASSE TOTAL COSTS 8" D.I. CLASS 52 PIPELINE (2) 1X" METER AT $4,940/EA ■w R 6" MJ' 8" D.I.CLASS 5„ . .,. $55,658 9,840 TOTAL: $65,498 INSTALL 8" MJ 45' BEND 1 - INSTALL 8" MJ GATE VALVE 160 15' UTILITY EASEMENT 0 W /MH W/MII 8" Mq x 6" FLG TEE W/ 6' FLG x MJ GATE VALVE .weinsermailsaram. NO .» mmousaatriunsemarrametrorsompaworrsolprimm im .. 0 pp W/ 8 LFLG x MJ GATELVALVE PP 0 IF S DOCUMENT IS LESS 1j4141 11111111T LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION, 1. j IT IS DUE TO THt QUALITY O1 THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. klbgbai mg ( I Inch m 40 tt. MATERIAL LIT 6" TJ DI PIPE, CLASS 52 8" TJ DI PIPE, CLASS 52 ..., 8 MJ x 2" IPT TEE, 8" MJ x 8" FLG TEE, 8"MJx6 " FLG TEE, 6646404.‘t0404.44060$ *** *** /. •...... 320 L.F. ...............1652 LF. .2 EA. 1 EA. 1 EA. 8" MJ x 8" MJ TEE.....,.... ,.......,. ........ . ....... ....... .............1 EA. 8" 90' MJ BEND, 3 EA. 8" 45' MJ BEND... 16" x 8" TAPPING TEE. 8" PE x 6" MJ REDUCER 8" MJ GATE VALVE... EA 6" MJ PLUG VALVE 1 EA, 8" FLG x MJ GATE I AL E ................... ................. ..... .. i........ 1 EA. 6" FLG x MJ GATE VALVE 2 EA, 4 EA. 1 EA. 2 EA. tett MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INC. 1995, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED MHACE K D A YEN N GS ' EARE N G E N CPR TE PRRONAOT R 1t AB R IUED IS. HE PRIOR W 1EN PEEAM1 P SHEET 3 R BM177ED FOR ... PERMIT 4/11/9:: sept6-rtsa 1\291 JOB. NO. 293037 iiilAiiu6iu iiuliu m14 t L T000 IlliIhlll IF THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. • SDR 93-17 33 OF 43 ti TitiriTTIT.1..1TTT 111 Mike Faha and Associates Landscape Architects ME1VIORANDUM TO: Mr. Lans Stout MacKenzie/Saito Associates 0690 SW Bancroft Portland, Oregon 97201 BY: Michael O'Bden Mike Fella and Associates DATE: May 20, 1996 PROJECT: Bingham Site Development SUBJECT: Plan Revisions ,I111110111116111•1.11 • 4r/ea • In response to our meeting of 5-15-96, I have revised the planting plan for the Bingham site according to COOT comments. The Douglas Firs that were to be planted in the R.O.W. have been removed on the plan. I have placed several of the Firs within the site where possible, and the rest are as follows: S .pQcI mumoommow ••••m• Pseudotsuga menziesii....... . . ..... .4-5' 2.......... .. . . $65.00 $130.00 Pseudotsuga mentesii..........0....6-7' 61... . . .. $100.00 . . $6,100.00 Pseudotsuga . . ... 14-16' ... . ....... 3 $200.00 ffla,ffl $6,830.00 Please call me if you have any questions or comments. End of Memo cc: File 800 NW SIXTH AVENUE • SUITE 327 PORTLAND, OR, 97209 PHONE: (503) 222-5612 FAX (503) 222-2283 ---lt---8 ilii !Hi iiii iiii ilii iiii iiLii iiii Iiri ziiii e.' ligli till iiii fill licit fill liri iT—TiiT—OZ 61 81 LI ffiliiiii iiii 1-11;----711 cifillitinioliffi 1111 "t Jill 191 111111111 ---T Itt 111111111 1111 et 1111 1111 Z1 1 IIII 1111 TIT6 1111 ----T,H-"" IIII 1111 MI 1111 I'll 1111 8L9 IIII IIII 1111 1 1111 1111 ' 1111 StireZionow , IIII Iill lilt 1111 1111 1111 MI IIII 1111 [ 0 wc..014060.0.0 14,..,,,,..vozzataanatcwortztvavivett tootutkixem• ."411710:4, •••••••••-•„taa,•••••ar.,.••.•■ ra•a••••••••a, 411111111k coamosre* mikdorritalsmookkortak vim-fi: (t) • I at, ir. ■•-•,. a• aaa:•••• ILa a a a tits* • • I • • „ ; • ,• • I. • • ,,, • II . . .. • , . . If-Iala•••• ••■•••••■•„ la. • f •••■••••■••••••■••■••••/ / • • ..... • ^ • . • R .. • • • . ./ ft • . . . ,•■••••.aa,„ ,,aa,.....,.....„,,,,,„,„„„,., ..1.• baoralacare,av.,,,,.. • saaaraa, ...4IFT47r7TITTT12,1:7:f7 , , , , . , , , . , • , • • , farra,,aana,a, 1 f • ,,,,,, • • • 1 11 a , ,,,,, . • •■•••■••••••••••••■•••* a•••••••••••••••* SDR 93-17 34 OP 43 a••••••••••*••••••.11•••• '41,!.1*40101110011m,' IP THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OP THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. .0***••••••••****1•*. ■ • / 171-Itjaraill II 1111 111111111 6Z 8Z Z .11 Na1111111 I 11. Prlpilli1111111111114 o at li g, g, t, OT till lilt Ill lilt tIlIlillIl Ill lilt lilt 1111 lIlt liii lilt till till liii iiiilliil lilt tIll lilt till till 1311111111 •••••••111••1".• T:Frilg-rtipittrru Na.to e • • • 3 111111111111111111-111111111'1111111111.111'1111111111111111f11111111f111111111 4,14,11/ GRAPHIC SC= 800 NW 6th Av &MS 327 Portland, OR 97o9 Phona: (03) 222-5612 raw (503) 222-2283 PLANT LEGEND TREES Acer rubrum 'Red Sunset' — Red Sunset Maple 2-1/2" cal. 13&13, Well branched, Headed at 6' Pyrus calleryana 'Capital' — Capital Pear 2" cal. B&B, Well branched, Headed at 6' Zelkova serrate 'Green Vase' Green Vase Zelkova 2" cal B&B, Well branched, Headed at 6' Pseudotsuga menziesii — Douglas Fir 14-16', Full trees, Branched to ground Pseudotsuga menziesii — Douglas Fir 6-7', Full trees, Branched to ground 0 Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas Fir 4-5', Full trees, Branched to ground (*) 0_ 0••••••••••••••••••••••*•.• • aaaa,.•••••• Existing Trees to Remain See Specifications SHRUBS / GROUNDCOVERS Myrica californica — Pacific Waxmyrtle 18-24", Full plants, Space as shown (6' o.c.) Cornus stolonifera 'Baileyr Redtwig Dogwood 18-24", Full plants, Space as shown (6' o.c.) Cornus S. 'Flavirameal Yellowtwig Dogwood 18-24", Full plants, Space as shown (6 o,c.) Ilex crenata 'Convexa' — Japanese Holly 15-18", Full plants, Space as shown (4' o.c.) Cornus S. 'Kelseyib — Dwarf ,11edtwig Dogwood 2 gal. cont., Full plants, Space as shown (3' o.c.) Mahonia aquifolium 'Compact& — Compact Oregon Grape 2 gal. cont., Full plants, Space as shown (3' o.c.) Gaultheria shalion Salal 1 gal. cont., Full plants, 3' o.c. Arctostaphyllos uva—ursi 'Massachusetts' — Kinnikinnik 1 gal, cont., Full plants, 3' Seeded Lawn See Specifications Seeded Fieldgrass See Specifications Annual Color By Owner / Contractor 0,C. NOTE: See specifications for irrigation and topsoil requirements amaaaaaa••••••„••••••••a•ama•aaaaaaaaaa, 5ptaitM9 .0214, 1(19q ( ) 1 inch os 30 itt. Mike l(pehaArchitecture I Associates 0 ::27,=••••=•••'-'1:31,1-a,••17-,,Tej MAC r 0 0) _I 0 L1JL > LIJ " L 0 <0) CE1 •••••••.•,•••••••••••• • 0 z cL 29 0 7 44.-4,4 • IF THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. SDR 93-17 35 0F43 503-224-2676 FAx 224-2679 MOBILE ,' 720-2551 BINGHAM CONSTRITC"ITONI INC. GENERAL CONTRACTORS :° SINCE 1884 SELWYN R. BINGHAM (BING. JR.) 3939 NW, ST, HELENS RD. VICE PRESIDENT PORTLAND, OR 97210 OfC6TC ETLii; I f) ro -171i , Z CC I gZ I ti--1."-ili 1 61 I Li I 91 9 I I "i C I Z I T 1: ii 61 S L 9 '9 t C ro il 11 1111 111111111 MI 111111111 111111111 11111111 1111 III III 1111 lffillIl 111111111 IIIIIIIII 111111111a1 181 1111 MIN HI iill 1111 1 MI 111111111 lin 111 1111 IIII lini MI iiii NH III IIIIIIIII MI 1111 lin HO MI 1111 till i111 MI MI MI tilt HMI iintitfli IF THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE � ORZGINAL DOCUMENT. P IIf fFITi 1 ' rTi PERMIT N O: l qc0-05" ... CITY OF TIGARD - TREE REMOVAL PERMIT A COPY OF THIS FORM MUST BE CLEARLY POSTED ON SITE OR IN THE POSSESSION OF THE PERSON REMOVING THE TREES DURING ALL TREE REMOVAL ACTIVITIES. 1. GENERAL INFORMATION PROPERTY ADDRESS /LOCATION 1=, . TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO. 5 i TW.76TATA-WC77.) esTmellri. PROPERTY OWNER* - '`p ADDRESS n� Si A R S S CITY 2,2,--TM-A-ty0) ' 4/04/ ,,... , ►,s., I- 4- /,t&M.. ,e" o SIGNATURE SIGNATURE PHONE ZIP APPLICANT* ADDRESS CITY BUSINESS NAME 22,,q 2,Z 60 PHONE ZIP 5-72.10 * When the owner and applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession of written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner with written authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided or submit a written authorization with this application. I 2. REASON(S) FOR TREE REMOVAL �, ,� • ' ., . 4 SDR 93-17 36 OF 43 RELATED LAND USE APPROVAL CASE NUMBER (if applicab'de) Please attach a photocopy of a tax map or site plan to the back of this form. A larger site plan may be submitted if necessary to adequately address the proposed tree removal. The site plan shall show: sP 1) The location of the subject site 2) All proposed or existing structures 3) All easements, dedicaitons, streams, wetlands, etc. 4) All trees over six inches in caliper size, measured four feet above grade 5) Basic indentification of tree types (common names) Pao4 36 1M..i�11� Caw. VIA E � � � � 6Z 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 BZ I,111 t i l l LZ 1 1 1 1 I I I I 9Z 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ''4Z 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 VZ 1 1 1 1 I I I I 6Z I 1 I 1 I I I I ZZ I I I I I I 1 I TZ I I I 1 IlIIlJJIjIIIII1I111I!11JI111IJIIIIJIIIIIIIIII1IJ1IIIIIIIIIIIIII OZ 61 hr, LT 9L 9I 6L SI IIIIlIIItIIjIIIIIJIIllIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIlJ111I1I11I 1111 BI 1111 TT Oi 6 8 L 9 1 1 1 1 9 t' 1 1 1 1 £ 1 1 1 1 Z 1 1 1 1 Iv�m • 4 SEE MAP as 1 13BD SEE MAP 2S 1 13BA a • to 0) '• . . . 11111/RWIIIIMPIPIWIPPIPIPPMIR 60' ,„: 40 •■••••' • W i71 • • ' • E 224.30' 292.43 200 1,72 Ac, 12: ••••••■••••• .1•••••••••••■■•■• 300 .49 AC, 240,217-- 22 256.11' 206.11 40.0 N Ow* ••••••11MONI• ••••••••••0 23 N 50' EN/ NIE 1/4 SECTION 13 11.23 IR I VV W.M. WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON SALE i' 1Q01 SEE MAP s I I3AB .PrP .roilfr.TIT.011 •"*I0Ph. I". 0... 0. • 0,,e,,,,.* ,o0fY,O,',Ofift, • , et(j'eff 00.1,400.4 ^ .mf 12 126 424.42 • ;..444.4*.4444•3,‘ ' 1 N c5 . I 5 0 48.38 50 Iv 400 ,86 500 ,90 AC, ICAO a...OM,* 274,63' 42 287.92' 4 43 303.83' 600 .95 AC. 44 ■ 319.73' // 70.84( 102' 700 .274C. 116' C7.70 t 800 .394C. 110' 107.07' CL, SAPV. SDR 9347 37 OF 43 60' -L! 1/ I le ol,lree e 146.67' -0 900 .89 AC. 0 II 2 146.67 .1/17/4Ith i000 .93 AC. 14617 • 10•00•■••••• boa 3.98 Ac. 12,57.4 427,32 25 26 C) UN ••••■••••■••4C1•444•4 1••••■••••••••• •■••••■•••••••• ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••■•••••■••••■• ••••••••••••••001••••••■•■■■••••••••••■•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 27 JL (C.S. 24,504) •■$ ft••• IIM•••••■••••• ••••••••••••■• VACATED .01 040.0•81, 36 33 33 4.4444440404,4 130 217181 539. A; N ,t000ille,'Ofe,,,I•Avje,teeee,0 120 OD 101 5,544c, 279.31 2e2.1 29 I 30 888/463 10••■•••••••••• iV I4V 31 e • 112.30' 1500 .35 AC, 1600 .47 AC. INITIAL POINT 100 /5.084c, FINDLAY 146.67' 1300 .48 AC. 1400 .48 AC. Lela AVii 1/0/11/1111~.MIY/1)11/41111~ CENTER OF SECTION $3 IF THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMET. 146.67 1200 2.86 AC. 41 $20' . ' • 146,67 1100 .93 AC. A c 40 39 120' 120' ife#1-WAliiii(0,0;###507,111,4/7 146,67' 4 St 146.67' ROW 44 • 5 00111•61.•••••11 146.67 38 120' 146.67 6 j 37 2374 3 120' 146.67 •11011.••••••040 111•11•■•••••••• 17 • 16 IV,04,1049MOW44444:947,10146'044/1444444/ '0/ /V/ & 4*.44114g4/ /4444444E* .1.4.1••••••••••••••••••••■•■••••••••0, C, 41••••• • • 7 011■11•00171•11...11 •••••••••••••• 111•1111•11.4.41•1•••• eirmewm•••• 15 14 SEE MAP 2s I 13DB N 25 : I 13AC 1.••••••••••••■• 35 :34 3 120' I .12d /1frWifille 1/4.6.6,,,W#7 /PAW 8 1 , V .1 re W (6o, 75' 120' $C) 120 146.67 .,011(171#/##/;7,414e0Y/ 146.67 9 VACATED 688/457 •■•••••••••••■ INNINIMIONO•0•141•1 ••••••••• Olowtafasa. • • SEE MAP 2S I I3AD Go' ••• • L 1••••••••■ 60' No.36 Goirlive.,:::00 L." *Th r - DURHAM TIGARD 2S I 134C Oe I 6Z i n Lig 93 -$93 f r Z CZ I 3C I 4 1 3 1 i i r ' flSTE117ft"T C I I I 17 I CI ZI I tit ill 61 81 LI 9 ' SI , t C 3 'ham 1111.111111111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 111111111 111111111 111111111 1111 1111 111111111 11111111I 111111111 111111111 111111111 1111 III' 1111 fill miliiii minim 111111111 iiilliiii IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 'III 'III IIII 1111 11114111 1 5tPlfit410EP 402Lf, PQ IF THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. 1-1-7 [TTI 1 O / 12 11:47 1 996 FROM: MAR 12 '96 12:02 WILLIAM L. OWEN and ASSOCIATES Tree and Landscape Consulting Services P.O. BOX 641, PORTLAND, OREGON- 97207 503/222 -7007 TO: Lams Stout Mackenzie Engineering, Inc. 0690 SW Bancroft Street PO Box 69039 Portland, OR 97201-0039 TO: 150 32281255 PAGE: 2 P.2 w 00,1111 DATE: March 12, 1996 RE: Bingham/Tigard Project Tree Preservation Plans FAX to: (503) 228 -1285 FROM: ' ',Lr Owen, B, S., M.A., C.A. A brief review of necessary steps we will follow in the subject project tree preservation program follows: 1) Prior to construction, 4' high orange plastic fencing on steel posts driven into the ground at approximately 8' intervals will be placed around the drip line of all tree marked for preservation. 2) Prior to conitruction, WLO will meet with construction contractor and other necessary parties to review tree preservation steps to be taken as work progresses. 3) As excavation proceeds nearby trees which border closely on parking lot and/or building construction, WLO will be present on -Site to deal with each peripheral root zone impact construction problem on an as needed basis. Therapies, aearcation, cut anti fill problems if any and any other similar root impact problems will be addressed at the time of construction, 4) Necessary pruning, wind - sail reduction, hard reduction if any, and other tree work as needed will be prescribed on site stuatio ' as the construction proceeds with the Mies that are heavily impacted but can remain. SDR 93-17 380F 43 INSPEOTION. DIAGNOSIS AND EVALUATION OP TREES, SHAMS AM) MATED PLANTINGS, CONSULTATION WITH RESPECT TO PLANTING. TRANSPLANTING PRESERVATION, MAINTRNANCE AND ARBOREAL PLANNING, OOMPREHENSIVE LOSS CC DAMAGE REPORTS, DULY SANCTIONED IONED APPRAISALS FOR LEGAL OR CONTRACTUAL PURPOSES, LEGALLY ACCEPTABLE TESTIMONY IN COURT CASES, • • 5cpt6MSER 02q, twq 111111111 luu iuiluu iiu iiiiluu iiuliiu uliiu iiulutgia 111111111 1111�Ii1161111111 lilt 1111 !III lumni f; Z ! i oetip�aw IF THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. • 0::4,/12 11:47 1996 FROM: MAR 12 ' 96 12: 03 Lans Stout Page 2 TO: 15032281285 PAGE: 3 P Groupings of trees as shown on the plot plan for preservation will be left undisturbed during the construction process. Individual tree problems and pig deadwood removal!, hazard removal, etc. will be dealt with over time so that at the conclusion of construction, the trees left remaining will be in state ofthe art condition in terms or arboriculture and safety. Follow up monitoring of trees during all of the constriction process beginning to end as well as for a full growing season following construction is routine and tter- of- -course for WLO on these projects. This insures maximum tree preservation base of the situational problem solving approach taken during construction.. WLO is on call to the contractor during the construction to alleviate any unforseen problems which may develop. In summa y, the process briefly recited above will result in maximizing tree preservation and minimizing tree loss of trees left after construction. This, p rocess has proven to be the most efficacious arboriculturally as well as the most safe from hazard and risk of la a to p ersons or property from trees failing post constniction in my experience. The process outlined above in brief will be followed on the Bin gham Tigard project, I await your instructions .s to when you wish to proceed with the first meeting with your contractor regarding tree fencing., Please let me know if you have any questions. teeMic wit) SDR 93 17 39 OF 43 No. 36 c.,weA„ R,oya YtA II u luiii 1111 i Itil u liii Jill uuiii u ui ui ii m iliii liii liii ii iiiliu�iih i111111111 No. 36 c.,weA„ R,oya YtA II Jill iIIi liii liii liii liii lillilill 1111,1111 Minn' CI IIIZI till IIII IIIIIIIII Iillllll lilt 1111 QII IIII IIIIIIfI 911�1111911�1111 lvlll�llll I£III�IiII IZIII�IIII 11ifi4lII 510 PQq lui IF THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. State o f Oregon Department o f Forestry / Department of Revenue Notification Number: 96-531-20589 Attached is the processed information from the Notification of Operation and /or Application for Permits. Please review this information and retain for future reference. [x] - Notice is given to the State Forester that an operation will be conducted on the lands described herein C - A Permit to Operate Power Driven Machinery is issued for the lands described herein (ORS 477,625). A Permit to Clear Rights -of -Way is issued for the lands described herein (ORS 477.685). DC] -- A Notice (ORS 527.670). EXPIRES END OF 1996. is given to the State Forester and the Department of Revenue of the intent to harvest timber sorrommaiwarnrasses (ORS 321.550) . UGB .. City of Tigard: forest operations are regulated by the city. permits/regulations contact Bonnie Hu hearty Q 639-4171 x349. I. WHERE TIMBER HARVESTING IS A PART OF THE PROPOSED OPERATION: A. NOTICE TO TIMBER OWNER: Party owning the harvested timber at the point it is first measured is shown in the section marked TIMBER OWNER and is ,responsible for payment of the Oregon Timber Taxes. B. NOTICE TO LANDOWNER: Party shown in the section marked LANDOWNER is responsible for reforestation of the site if so required. II. PRIOR APPROVAL BY THE STATE FORESTER AND WRITTEN PLANS: - A PRIOR APPROVAL may be required before certain activities can commence on the Operation. A WRITTEN PLAN may be required for the situations indicated by an (X) Below. Approval of a WRZ OEN PLAN or a WRITTEN WAIVER must be obtained from the Forest Practices Forester before any portion of the OPERATION may commence. 1 C3 Within 100' of a large lake or Type F or Type A stream. (OAR 629-24-113(a)) - Within 300' of a wildlife resource site listed in the 1984 ODF /ODFW Cooperative Agreement. (OAR 629-24-113(b)) - Within 300' of any resource identified in the 700, 800, or 2300 series administative rules. [OAR 629- 24- 113(c)] - Within 300° of a state or federally listed threatened or endangered wildlife resource site. [OAR 629- 24- 113(d)] Please contact the Forest Practices Forester on the Unit Information sheet for further, information on requirements that may be necessary to meet before activities /operationebegin. 4r Signed by:. Stuart S Bingham Representing the Operator Bingham Investment Company Stuart Bingham 3939 NW St Helens Road Portland, OR 97210 (Landowner Copy) SDR 93.17 40 OF 43 District: Office: County: WOSTOT: Forest Grove Forest (rove Washington Date Received: Time Received: 3/08/96 Mail For 15 DAY WAITING PERIOD REQUIRED * * * * r * * * N O T I C B * * * * ** The State Forester has determined the following PROTECTED RESOURCES are located within or adjacent to your operation area: Operator: Stuart Bingham Bingham Investment Company 3939 NW St Helens Road Portland, OR 97210 Phone: (503) 224 -2676 Landowner: Stuart Bingham Bingham Investment Company 3939 NW St Helens Road Portland, OR 97210 Phone: (503) 224 -2676 Timberowner: Stuart Bingham Bingham I nve s tment Company 3939 NW St Helens Road Portland, OR 97210 Phone: (503) 224 -2676 James E. Brown State Forester District Forester N0,36 c.nw"awau++c.�rweair ' towNisQ 41 IIlI11II1dtIIIJ1JIJ I liii I . 111111111 liii III I liii ILIIIIUIILIIII liii II � l�lly IIII�I T IIlillll O IIIIiIII 1111 liii Bi II IIIluffil6ullll u�uueZ 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 lilnl 111114111 I 1 5pt6M(SX' aq, PQq :t . 00' it.lik b 0 N ........ c3 _ IN 111111 INN1..) MK 1 at IN L..... ell Nal 0 Illit III itit o., tut SP mii 0 ..._______.11 II 111111 b (\ i I 1 1 III III 18.0 18,0 Mai 1111 al 4 UM (N NM O 1 MIA 15.0C1 P . 1 amt MK 15.0C PIM M • ril ill 111 III 1 . OC ' NM fillilllit 1,111111111i 4111111111111111 ,1401111•001111111 ...ddiAMINIMINIMIllmmil AL IllialliilIMMUIPAIRMINNIIIMMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMI1111141111111 Apill111111111a1161111111111111111111111011111111111111100 #0111111111111111 1110111E1111111111111M1111110111111111111.11111.1LL adamma .nsp-iomn•mon.i.i•mm•mmnmmp..mmmm.n.m.muimgrj imainamsawr ii. zo•Tor , & alli r ..,,, „,_____ "-sAINI44,8_,_ -..,,,.....____ -..,.„..,, ST. MN RIM 175.99 1E, 1 70.30 (COT AS-91)ILT) C9 RIM 1754i 1E 172O 1Zedvtatme.,„ ept,40 1-g SDR 93-17 41 0P43 g 30' DRIP( • 0 'tt - • 0 W/M1-3 0C.tS. 0 W/MH 0 W/MH 0 HT 1 'opA Ps . t; oPP •ar ammarampummeaarmarramaaleal..11.0.110MNIMMOIRMUNI aa oPP 12"HP .rhilroaraMII4.00.101111•MMIMINWM•MatatlyarallIrelalarl, Oa! ra Rataaaaraartmarararamsamataaa•aaraa 004 aaamar•••••••■• isimaimmo mmumumws sannammommom mommammumm ".11011111,41M.MIMM•11111,4•1110.1.1.1.1,1■1101,111H101.11111.111•1.111•11.0101•Imma 1.1.1.011■001411■101•MOMIN 40.001 H-H .441.1110111110110-11ra 0 LL 63.00' 0 PP . am 0 0 .0 Tritl 0 0 c.) . areareamaramma aammommtaamissmrarwassammal, PP 0 mammarmamasommemammelammaramarawatiamaimmal OM .01 111.110.111101111MIMINIPMIMMNMairtar.111•1 1.0 0 Q64.00' 0 6 3. 00' 30.00' 9.00' (NI 10.00 RUN 1111111*,, 4 0 1'0 41Pir ZD c0 4.00' 5,00 24, tO 4.00' 0 0 1,6 0 0 4,00 0 0 .---------... CN 0 411111111111.110.. 6. I 30.00' 18.00' 0 PP 6.00 0 0 0 30. 160.00' FF 180.00 am am atwormam......ase PP 0 29.00' 8. PP Ba a 160.00' FF*178.50 APIIIIIMI01.11111141111.1114.11.1111.111111111/00 1 2 1 OLP <EY\IOTES 1. PYLON SIGN 2. TRASH ENCLOSURE ' 1 `t LEGEND EXTRUDED CURB VERTICAL CURB it SITE ANALYSIS TOTAL CITE AREA: BUILDING LEASABLE AREA (NOT INCLUDING MEZZANINES): GROUND FLOOR: LANDSCAPE (INCLUDES ONLY PERVIOUS SURFACE): REQUIRED: PROVIDED: PEDESTRIAN LANDSCAPING/COURTYARD: PARKING: REQUIRED BY TIGARD CODE (GENERAL RETAIL): PROVIDED: STANDARD: COMPACT: HANDICAPPED: TOTAL: 0•110•11 298,319 SQ.FT. 69,265 SQ.FT. 44,748 SQ.FT. (15%) 52,769 SQ.FT. (17.7%) 14,190 SQ.FT. (4.8%) 187 (2.5 PER 1000 GSF) 253 (72.9%) 86 (24.8%) 8 (2.3%) 347 DATE: 4-7-94 DRAWN BY: KAW\SAS CHECKED BY KJK\LS GRAPHIC SCALE IF THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGI8L8 THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OV THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT, '61 i IlPg11111111 liiiiiiiii 5 A ilt 1111 111111111 111111111 f1111111. 1111 11111 f111111ii 1111g 4111 f11111111 111111111 111114 f1111111 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch v. 30 ft. N�.30 ettilVt.•„",er 1 I 0, 111111111 1111 1111 1111111111 11111111U111111111 11111111'11 9.11111111 1 1111111111 9 1111i1111 ?111111111fl'iiii‘gli 111110141.11121111. PERMIT SUBMITTAL 2/26/96 5Tteit4,60 .214” ricNty IAACKENZIE ENGINEERING INC. ''" 1003, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED THESE DRAWING ARE RIE PROPERTY Or MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INC. (141 EA.) AND ARE NOT TO DE USED OR REPRO- DUCED IR_ ANY MANNER, EXCEPT 'MTh 111E PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF 41tatmorramwarpormarrootarammo SHEET SDI OF' honararmaramawalsmammormar•••• JOB NO. 293037 co 0 CIVIL \037— SDLDVG RIM 173,$9 IE 162.54 SbR 93-17 42 OIL 43 ST.MH RIM 175.99 IE 170,30 (COT As-ear) .r) 08 RIM 175,15 IE 172.30 930" UR'WY 0/v o War0p QPP x 4.<( 2 "Elf oPP ASPHALT PIZ .' * min s ■RRR*Rmumum moms m , .Winnummi r:Yont 4. PARKING c PP $89*10'001'E 6 1 4. Y P4 1r les0000.0004, w • a..K.,at�.4n., fM•.ssaa,.rap..,manf Mwr__. ayr PP 0---) S2`l"40'15 "W 16.61' rem 0 in Mira' 1 I ► d ...T.G:r AMUR illhiml;Reli PAU NM R ... 1111 F X �I NN X "Mil ' 'IN3 MIN MIL ,4► NM rill � . r en : ,)c 30' 1Crr x 6"FXX I' Mm -ST 43 0 ' 22"r ae cr F x x X24" 14"F X 15"F X X �6"A X 1 4 r'' }` fib" F 'F 2.2"F �1 X Er r X [2t'F X1VN X 1"Ff 7 x 18~F ?<20)"r .4 4; x 1", e 22 "F x'x X „ x X .k t2 "F x 12"6" 18'T X , o ►A rt GRAPHIC SCALE 14" I X 2 -10" DW N, ■ -7 W W , �V 7"F X X 18 "F SEDIM N MANHOLE V , LP X3(1'F X 18"F X2 x24 "F CB-6" i`> 18 "F X 45' 0 W /MH 00.T,S, 0 W /MH 0 W /MH 15"F X X X. •"7 /��IIr 4 xI 'Tr. tan' 0X 26 4 4 2M , Ai ® ® ma ]. t1 1 mom m na IIiii1ii1•iIIIII.�4Ir'� ■r /,, x 1 aFwl�r Ilrstcag,ill.1rll�lllifal �l�ll' 44 „ . �rnt1~i x 1 ' \„, • -i s -r .. X`� 4 P�X X�" x 1 r F Xtia X 17' F 6112111,,'Illy x 24" F \` Jfi h4 �,t4 X ,"�-'+� . - 1 X44 X' X X 34'" F X x� - �- 'X'' 4 ,,� 4 x 14"F +, x 6 4 ,b i� Xh 0 4 4 x?‹ x 1Fi "F X xX X\ X` „1,,64,4. x 4't \ � 4 M� C 18 "FX CB X10" 7'! X "DW TOP =84:1'O M 1', / X 10 "F PRA • .aa.- X X 144 "F TOP =184.p6 BOTTO 1 8O 22"F l I TOP=185.1 BOTTOM=181 ' I I •0,1 I!I 0 PP S89`37'00" W 234.81' IF THIS DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGIBLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS bUi TO THE QUALITY O1: THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT, PP 0 BOTT /1 MIR OM. MIER MIN SRN MOM // //r _ •r� r1.:I I I.'TT (I J I1T I 1 I 1 �j _1 I _� I i"� j�-I�� Ij j II IIIIIj1111i1 0 1111 IIIIIIIII llilllil iiiluu llllllilt lililfill lllllllll illillll 111111111 fill�lil iiilfil illlllil i1illii iulm 111111111 111111111 1.11111111 I1I Il fI IllIII Ill1lll Ill II ai�uii�iiu�uu T11—'1 1P 111 111 1111111 111 11I 11111 l i. NO; s.,..r...... 9 .l �, 1' 6f url 1 I I ti I Ili II I ll 111 IIllIIIl1lil IIIIIII Il�IIIILI�II�II � I I I � 11111�1t1lI LEGEND vi ( irTZT 1 inch a. 30 tt. EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED CATCH BASIN DRYWELL 17S.S0 SPOT ELEVATION QRADING NOTES 1. ROUGH GRADING: BRING ALL FINISH GRADES TO APPROXIMATE LEVELS INDICATED, WHERE GRADES ARE NOT OTHERWISE INDICATED, FINISH GRADES ARE TO BE THE SAME AS ADJACENT SIDEWALKS, CURBS, OR THE OBVIOUS GRADE OF ADJACENT STRUCTURE. GRADE TO UNIFORM LEVELS OR SLOPES BETWEEN POINTS WHERE GRADES ARE GIVEN. ROUND OFF SURFACES, AVOID ABRUPT CHANGES IN LEVELS. ROUGH GRADE TO ALLOW FOR DEPTH OF CONCRETE SLABS, WALKS, AND THEIR BASE COURSES, GRADE FOR PAVED DRIVES AND PAVED PARKING AREAS AS INDICATED AND SPECIFIED HEREIN, AND PROVIDE FOR SURFACE DRAINAGE AS SHOWN, ALLOWING FOR THICKNESS OF SURFACING MATERIAL. FINISH GRADING: AT COMPLETION OF JOB AND AFTER BACKFILLING BY OTHER CRAFTS HAS BEEN COMPLETED, REFILL AND COMPACT AREAS WHICH HAVE SETTLED OR ERODED TO BRING TO FINAL GRADES. GRADING TOLERANCES: ROUGH GRADE AT PAVED OR LANDSCAPED AREAS: XO.1 FT. FINISH GRADE PRIOR TO PLACING FINAL SURFACING: 1.0.03 FT. 2. b(CAVATION: EXCAVATE FOR SLABS, PAVING, AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS TO SIZES AND LEVELS SHOWN OR REQUIRED. ALLOW FOR FORM CLEARANCE AND FOR PROPER COMPACTION OF REQUIRED BACKFILLING MATERIAL. EXCAVATOR(S) MUST COMPLY WITH O.R.S. 757.541 THROUGH 757.571; EXCAVATOR (S) SHALL NOTIFY ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR LINE LOCATIONS 72 HOURS (MINIMUM) PRIOR TO START OF WORK. DAMAGE TO UTILITIES SHALL BE CORRECTED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 3, EFFECTIVE EROSION CONTROL IS REQUIRED. ERC ' ' CONTROL DEVICES MUST BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED MEETING ',. D,E.Q. REQUIREMENTS. THE CITY MAY, AT ANY TIME, ORDER CORRECTIVE ACTION AND STOPPAGE OF" WORK TO ACCOMPLISH EFFECTIVE EROSION CONTROL. 4. EFFECTIVE DRAINAGE CONTROL IS REQUIRED. DRAINAGE SHALL BE CONTROLLED WITHIN THE WORK SITE AND SHALL BE SO ROUTED THAT ADJACENT PRIVATE PROPERTY, PUBLIC PROPERTY, AND THE RECEIVING SYSTEM ARE NOT ADVERSELY IMPACTED. THE CITY MAY, AT ANY TIME, ORDER CORRECTIVE ACTION AND STOPPAGE OF WORK TO ACCOMPLISH EFFECTIVE DRAINAGE CONTROL. stritem,60 .2q, ty PERMIT SUBMITTAL 2/26/9f INCORPORATED MACKENZIE ENGINEERING a I co 0 csi CO t C: fi3 o trz ant%>4 C�� • a, I a tr- 04 ILO CiG©cy .gip ..,r,, Gp0 • K7 , F.: U 0 Q IL I- z w 0 00) LU 0 L 0 • :CF- O z 11, 0 z 0 40?!! 4 i 15,504 44) ON 44RL KOCk EXPIRES: 6 13-5-70— DATE: 1/19/96 DRAWN BY: BMK CHECKED BY: KJK /LS REVISION EDITION CLOSING DATE: 3 3 20/ 96 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING ING, 1993, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED THESE DRAWING ARC THE PROPERTY OF AND ME NOT TO DE USED OR REPRO-. DUCED IN ANY MANNER/. .ERCEPT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF SHEET SD2 JOB NO. SDR 93-17 43 01743 e • • RIM 173.89 IE 162,54 ST.MH RIM 175,99 IB 170.30 (COT AS-BUILT) ca RIM 17.5.15 it 172.30 g 30' OR'WY 0 0 0 w/mii cPC.T.S. 0 W/M1.1 0 WIC °int PP GAS • t44 X 0-01104-amilm • x' xdO 22"F X / Xer xf1 0 PP I** OPP 1 7."HP "4. 4411.1.011.1014•14.1141.111.011400.1•.10..441.4.0114.11.0411.MMIMM....0 ssimpoigusprommimmipi appfiummuimmummiiiimill 0 PP x 72■Amm4:1104:: F X X 16" F 22" F x X 10"F X el,* X I 24„ F xX e .44.46 Qom. .4144. /4 X 16"F X 141F X x X x 7"F 7"F X X X AA F 1 6" r x x x 1 a • F 18"F X 6"F X 9. le e, 10"E Xxq, "A F lc? 114 X 18"F “, • • , mrioppraos imamolianum , x X 30"F X 18"F X 24"F 61114.14 4.441..1 X /64 ,c■ 22"F X X x • t4 \ A S4 X 24' F 4/Nda. 4.154.4 Wee 4 20" Fl 6.2:;FxX X .4 X C 4 X X 2eF , '‘ x)'' X xr X1 Xr; X'\cS< 22"F X X 24"F 18'F Xx 6"F 40, 4 X ds4 XxX P.15 x,0 xv F XX A A N 8"F X x x .4 f),x - .■ • • • - • " 11.0 1011.1014411.40.144.1.0.1111.4.10.1111.11101011.11141.11140•41....0 PP 0 • yrifsmamS.I.X.IIIMIW.811.1.111MaIMINKIX.110M04,118r. ..--..—..--,..,----.................,,....—,-,.....--,,,,„..,..,........--------.---.--,-- ,c' X 12"F X 13"F 14-"F X X ( X X X X 26"F .i4 .4 e( I, X 15" F X (1' P.‘c X X 3-6"AL X lin) 41 11111111111.11111 • wriiiiimmu Ne 24" F NI X x MIMI MN. 13"F g A' `` 1226"F a it lit 40 X '7" F X X „0 X4 .i:1111111111,12111: Elin .1114101- ILE RIM 61h A o'c III A x 'N (I,A x X ><11" • X.\,\20:" F ?'/IN: X 6 1, NW 4, XX X Ilillgi' xeP MIN ' x2o7 ass x .?< , xlY` int inn. A X',1 0 )<.3 X 26 23 t{ MOW x'1 Xt.‘ X X r N n. ci, 18" F X A MIK e xl, saw 9" F ><( x(11 X 1 "" 41. F NM: .1111ffil x2-io-ow al IIII 13" F XX 13" F . \'‘' MIMI x" ,,t, x ,„te‹ 9, (:).A x'' x<t'' II II II 1111 IS X 4<` X 4 tit ' NMI Mt It 111111 NM 'RIK MIMI NM rillIII ' all: 28:x5i'F. x 11111111111, x .4' LIM xc' 1 x N 111E12.1711111111111 ' 4, 9" M X,,.,S 411111111111111111 Olio ail- AllIMITIII xx x 26" r -somprammin mmHg X 2 0" F :' ' .1 i' ti4filinni11111111111111111111111r1ROININ filuttairlanaganul'iatrualliaillatina°sL' IIIIIIIIIIMPINNIIIII. 111111111111r ,,s,'( ro, x '1% IIIMI IIIMINNU lar XN X gi4 NIP' II, '''' xi' )24"F ,,c 1:1?"4\x e< ir vz-N. xN x nil ..., 0 X NI ..4,x'' 4, 4 ilt 0? , ''' X X- ,4o/ „,4) x's, ,,,.<( X A 18" F X x^ x clr 4 e, x rl: c' X XNt Ps 14"F X X 15" F c:;\ 1'54;6 10" F X 8"P X ,A x4) 329F X 4)4 21'F X xe 13 8" DW X x4ecx 149F X A 6 NI' 4, ' x .4 15"F X - x NCO X 20"F x Ps) cs" Lx • \s x X 10"AL X 20"F f. • L. Xi\ X12"F x 24"F X 20"F X 24"P X 77 Xr/53 (SP. x x x 20"F X 5" OW iN X CO4 X 2 47 716 x 12"F XX 24"F x43 X Ntx *c‘s. 10"m x <‘4' .4 ,3-10"AL X 26" F 26" F .....1•••••■•••••■•■•••■•••••..11.11•11.111.1•10..M.I.007.......1...1.10.. 1Q FRI 9" 11"12" F X 15"F X 15'F X X X 2X 2"F X 18" F 22"F 1,1„Fl (20»v X 1t3'' F X 8" F X 12"F X 22"F X 20"F rt4 x P.e x .4 ) X 24" X 12"F X 10"!:' X 12"F X /0` x 18"F 5"F X 18"F Xxl.rt: 7" F X X-4 ,,64 X 20"F X e( XX vt" rir' X \° X X AN X N-19 X 13" F x7,1..44,4 A A X As 20" F X (41 14"F X x 34" F X 04 7" F X co X\ 22 F X X 10F! X6 F A x X 1.4. 18"1 x X 12" F X 34" F X xh% 1 27 x x 4" F 20"F X kr1, 12" F. se< X 14" F 1,6 X 20"F X 22"F X X 14" F X x e X 13" F X'v 1111111111111muumuwaium 6 1 X(?) X Nv 14"F wasurvanzmau X( x e X14 'F x e ‘._ moos omm. QMI r., ow. ammo m.o. 44.1.4. Ws PP , X X 11"F X 22"F X 3-16" F X 10" M 4:.A6<4 1/4,PN x x RIB /V T1-US DOCUMENT IS LESS LEGISLE THAN THIS NOTATION, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY O1 THE ORIG/NAL DOCUMENT. ,6 44, x x x x x 12" 14" 24" F X 15"F X X .4 18' X X ,0 X X , X X V A \ X 4 (t X P;rS 22"F X X 28"F 22" F X12"F 16" 04 x^§c' X 10"F X 2-8"F X X X 20F Xxx 16"F IM1 ▪ 1114..m44.1.111.41111114111111.0,01.1.01.111.1111111.1p11.111.1111114 PP 16" F 27"F 22"F X 'csx 11"F X F X" 12"F" X 12"F 6" F ")6 .4% X X 12"F X 22"P x 10"F 18"F X 24"F x1 6.F X 20" F 14F Xv 10'M 6” X 127 X 27" F 8" X 1 0'E X 12"F r its,— 7,, 14"F 1 X 1 x 24" F PP 0 1111111,111111111i1 X 36"F ..mtosommoommimpsi.....m.orr 11111-firpril p III pirfrril-pirr 1 41 1 [ 1 UHI1UHriUHNHII ;OW JJII f11114 611111 t tit I 9T i it I Ot 11111111 111111111 111111111 111111111 111111111 111111111 111111111 1111 1111 111111111 6 1111 1111 131111111 0 cir 15 GRAPHIC SCALE 125 LEGEND ( IN 1,EX1 inch at 80 ft. TREE PROTECTION AREAS (FIELD VERIFICATION BY ARBORIST) *p% 111111TpiIi WOG (0 ter-tit-Tr 1,, 111111111 141' 1111111 9, 1, 111111111 111111111111ii1i 11111111i 161.6114.1110411.410014...111 / 5t06-ititm, Pckl PERMIT suBmrn-AL 2/26/96 ,:r4 ck- :e": ‘,.:cNier" L.. d S „ 0 ,,..,..!: 0) to 11) CO CO 0 Cs4 X CY NI 00 0 ” C4,.., ." e C i... i 11 0 VS l'••• L. 0 0 *Pp N. In Is 0 ch 0) 1.„ . O I LL1 1.9 ac co c.1 — ? -0:3 aicsi Z 2043, 1-.0 4* 1.11 0 ..k...0 • 13 0 g 0. • 0 < z,..5 13 if§. z LU C CL 0 00) (1) W1,- >0 w :2 0 <0) 0 CT3 PRESERVATION cL 45PRO N 14?- 15,004'1$" 01111GON ÷,4 -101, 28 EDLIRESLQSPIEL DATE: 1/19/96 DRAWN BY: BMK CHECKED BY: KiJK\LS REVISION EDITION CLOSING al DATE: 3 20 96 C") "" MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INC. 1993, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED THESE DRAWING ARE THE PROPERTY or MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INC. (1.1.E1.) AND ARE NOT TO UE USED OR REPRO- DUCED IN ANY MANNER, EXCEPT WITH THE PR(OPt WRITTEN PERMISSION OF M,E.I. SHEET SD6 293037 JOB t40.