Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
SDR89-12
POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. ( * , . ■ .f . , ail IA 41, \ ' , ,„ '-' i .. 1 ci, , AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING V . . . . . , ' STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, ifbaA.k ? c'it-d(A..ke.„A-ALY.L) , being first duly swora/affirm, oa oath ., depose and say: Please Print That I am aVI, (-4-Ael AEop„ ),L4,41...- for . The City of Tigard, Oregon. That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING for: 17-irtat I served NOTICE OF DECISION for: ty of Tigard Planning Director ,....... Tigard. Planning Commission .4 ' : Tigard Hearings Officer . '. Tigard City Council , .. A copy (Public Hearing Notice/Notice of Decision). of which is attached (Marked ,.. , Exhibit 'Ti) was mailed to each named persons at the address shown on the attached list marked exhibit "B" on the IL112:' day of ...it.A.."4"4... 1911.0 ; . said notice NOTICE OF DECISION as hereto attached, was posted on an appropriate bulletin board on the up day of ---JL..(....,V,J2..... , 19%9 ; ),"“11,-- * ' ' and deposited in the United States Mail on the .....12 day of JUA"....0....- . . . 196'4;1, postage prepaid. , , . , . i OF . . • kit_1, 1t..mo v i,,,_ . ic-2•29-0... .L.4..i Vtk_ki___A-_g.mk_-_____ . _ Signature , / # Person who posted on. Bulletin Board • ' .,, (For Decision Only), ■ 4 , $ ' , I 'LA& 4'••,' ...dk.:,1,4 '• rikb...4116.... ....a.,' ' ■ i Person who delivered to POS1 0 FI" ' 1 ' . .. , _ STIripenand,Sworn/affirm to before me on the to day ottizzi, , I19 ,, _. I'4,,,,t:.i.■ ,0 ' • I, I .1 . '■ ,;"-' .,,,,1 ' . f ■ • , ';'ii k . 4 , , , „ ,•• ,' •,, ,r ',,,, , . •‘ ,,7 , " . C ) ° I '? ' el P:14C1 2 1,10TWE P47,1, *0 F'CREGON My Commission txpires: 0257P/0006t 4 •I , , 1. ' . • , S I '1 • 41 ° 1 ' . f,.,...,...._...,.......a.,..,,.1......_....',._.�....,._ ..s„»......,,_._.d.., .,..,,........_ ,..,..,,..,,. ...�,m. •.. , ,,...... .., r»._.....,•.....,r,. ......_M.T,..,..._.._„, .....,.__,.4_:...,%.'I......y!...ti•,....,..,,,.,�el-._,. ..«aw......,,......_.,.. .., ..- V i r L� Pc” g c-( A , e' 'x CITY OF TIGARD 'al*Ix NOTICE OF DECISION ,��, SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 89-12/V 89--17/M 89-11 s ` ;,x,, :, , TRAMMEL CROW CO. °'+` f ly APPLICATION: A request by Trammel Crow Company for Site Development Review ,v,r` approval to construct a 120,750 square foot, eeven-story office building and a two-story parking structure on a 4.84 acre site presently zoned C-P (Commercial. Professional). Also requested is a Variance approval to the building height ', ",, requirement in the C-�P zone which is normally 45 feet and approval of a Lot • fo Line Adjustment to adjust two parcels measuring 30,056 and 110,642 square feet • • \\.....s, into two parcels , d ,€i . requ proposes to change the alignment of 23868 of an SW 93rd 116 Avenue 30 square(SW f©et Lincoln This Street)est Finallyalas , the applicant has requested Variance approvals to reduce the parking space width from 9 to 8 feet wide and to allow up to 45 percent of all parking spaces to be . • designated as compact spaces. Location: 10200 SW Greenburg Road (WCTM 1.81 35AF3 lots 1002, 1004, 900, 500, 501, 600, 700, 701, 702 and portions of lot 2800 and • • • 2901)» , DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director's designee for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above requests sub j sot to certain conditions. 0 The findings and conclusions on which the decision was based are noted below. . A. FINDING OF FACT • 1. Background .. The subject properties were annexed to the City of Tigard in late • April, 1981. Prior to the annexation, two land use applications (Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Special Use Permit) were filed with Washington County. Also it was agreed at that time between the City and County that all applications in process at the County would ,, continue even, if the final decision occurred after annexation. A Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change (Case No. 87-73-M) to .•'• ' change the land use designation from R-5 (Residential, 5 units/acre) and Institutional to 0-C (Off ice Commercial) on parcels located immediately north of Oak Street and west of Lincoln Street extension 1 .... was approved by the Board of Commissioners on May 19, 1987. o• need by th. parking g ( v . 7� 22-SU) was P. Special e Permit for a Arkin lot Case o. 8; 1 • gra y e County on May 13, 1987, for four residentially zoned parcels located at the southwest corner of Locust Street and 93rd ii ' Avenue. The residences on these pro erti _ parking p es were removed and a pa area was developed. The conditions of app roval imposed by the county remain in effe t t has beef anne. Also, since this prope y e xed and the City does no allow commercial parking lots in residential tones, this : portion of the Lineoin Center parking lot is a nonconforming uee. On May 1S, 19 . .g City 'pp g the 7 , .�` . X17 the Tigard . , i and Cit CoUndil approved the rezoning a, + '. NOTICE OF DECISION e TRAMMEL CROW CO (SIJR 89-12/V 39b-1'7/3 89-1i) PACE I. • • �F< ee , '410 „, I V • annexed area in Metzger from Washington County designations to City designations which most closely resemble the County zones. This ordinance (No. 87-22) became effective on June 18, 1987. Subsequent . • reviews utilized the City Community Development Code rather than the County regulations. A Site Development Review (SDR 87-08 and V 87-07) was conducted by City staff in June, 1987 for an approval to construct as 12-story office building. It was approved subject to 16 conditions. In June of 1988, the Hearings Officer for the City of Tigard approved a Conditional Use permit request to allow the construction of a rooftop heliport atop the newly constructed Lincoln Tower office building. This application Baas approved subject to 13 conditions. e". In March, 1989, the Director'S designee approved with conditions a request for several lot line adjustments and a minor land partition creating a new parcel at the southwestern corner of the Lincoln Center property (M 89-06/MLP89-05). • In May, 1989, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend ' A approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change request (CPA 89-05/ZC 89-05) affecting the Lincoln Center property (tax lot 900 and a portion of tax lot 1002) and siz residential properties to the east. A recommendation to the City Council was forwarded with the suggestion that a deed restriction be placed on the property to restrict the use on the residentially zoned land to a parking facilities use. Also approved was an amendment to the Metzger-Progress Community Plan to allow for the re-alignment of SW 93rd Avenue. These requests were approved by the City Council on May 15th and a final order is expected to be signed on June 12, 1989. In the applicant's submittal two separate site plans were provided Bo as to afford the applicant a timely submittal, in the case that the '1 comprehendive plan amendment and zone change was not approved. As a * result of its passage by the Council, staff will only review that site and associated plan which correspond with the recent amendments. 2, Vicinity Information Properties immediately to the west and south are also part of the Lincoln Center complex and are likewise zoned and developed as C-P (Commercial Professional) . Properties imMediately to the north are zoned and developed C-P and 11-12 (Multi-family Residential, 12 units per adre) . The Metzger School is located immediately to the east and is zoned R.4.5 (Single Family AeSidential, 4.5 units per adre), The • Metzger-Progress Community Plan designates the school property as "Institutional". Properties north of SW LocuSt Street and eas't of SW ,■ : 93rd Avenue are in uninoorporated Washington dountym NOTICE or DECISION - TRAMMEL CROW co (SDR 89-12/V 89-17/4 89-11) PAGE • „ , • , ' " j 14.04A,i • 3. Site Information and Proposal The Lincoln Center property is presently developed with four office P buildings with a gross floor area of approximately 530,000 square feet , and two parking structures on a total of seven parcels. The office building is proposed to be constructed on two tax lots: tax lot 900 lies at the northeastern corner of the property. Immediately north and west of it is tax lot 1002 which measures 2.91 acres and now contains the Lincoln Center III building. The applicant proposes to construct a 120,750 square foot, seven-story office building on tax lot 1002, just north of the Lincoln Center XII building. A two-level parking structure is intended to be built on, 1.37 acres of land immediately to the east of SW 93rd Avenue (SW Lincoln Street) which currently contains six single family residential homes. Approximately 520 parking spaces will be provided by the new parking structure; approximately another 224 will be available on the ' ground. In addition, the applicant is requesting a Variance approval to exceed the maximum building height standard in the 0-P zone of 45 feet. The • • new seven story building, if conOtructed, would be 92 feet 6 inches to • the roof line. Another Variance proposal requests permiSsion to decrease the parking space width from 9 to 8 feet and to allow up to 45 perCent of all parking spaces to be designated as compact spaces. Finally, the applicant proposes a lot line adjustment between the Lincoln Center and the Metzger School property just south of SW Mapleleaf which is necessary to accommodate the realignment of SW 93rd Avenue. Portions of tax lot 2800 and 2901 will be shifted to the west side of the proposed, realigned SW 93rd Avenue. The two affected 4 . parcels, measuring 30,056 (School district) and 110,642 (Trammel Crow) •, A square feet each are proposed to be adjusted to 23,868 (School district) and 116,830 (Trammel Crow) Square feet. 4. Agency and NPO Comments The Metzger Water District, Portland General Electric, the State Highway Division, and the ConSolidated Fire District have al/ reviewed • the proposal and have no objections to it. I Neighborhood Planning Organization #8 has reviewed the proposal and comments that it has concerns as to flooding of homes due to concentrated (storm water) drainage into Ash Creek and Ash Brook, The City Building Division has reviewed the propoatal and has the • , • following coMments: a. A condition of approval should require that no construction be allowed to take place between the hours of 9:00 p.tflo and 7:00 a.m. MoTIC ig or DECISION - TRAMMEL CROW CO (SDR 89-12/V 80-1/./M 89-41) PAGE 14 J -;;#,' • • , ' 44 I • b. It should be required that all construction materials be stored on-site. CO It should be required that off-street parking be provided for all construction-related vehicles and trailers. t . d. Flagmen should be provided when construction vehicles are y. blocking public streets Er' The. City Engineering Division has reviewed the proposal and has' the 9` , following comments: a. Access to the site will be from SW Locust Street, SW 93rd Avenue and SW Mapleleaf Drive. The submitted site plan for Lincoln Center V shows four accesses onto Locust Street, plus the 93rd s,Y �. •, Avenue intersection and the Mapleleaf . Drive intersection to Locust Street. Two accesses are proposed onto the relocated SW 93rd Avenue and one access is proposed onto the extended . Mapleleaf Drive. Locust Street is a major collector street and will be iMproved in 1989 as a result of previous developments and ', :'• the Tigard Major Street Bond Projects. Its intersection with SW Greenburg Road is currently unsignailized'. The construction plans are currently being designed for the Locust Street improvements. The applicant should coordinate the design of the two projects so ;' that construction can occur without duplication of effort. J' The applicant proposes to vacate the existing right-of-way of SW 93rd Avenue between SW Locust and SW Mapleleaf Street and r relocate it to SW 92nd Avenue at Locust Street. s' ; SW 93rd Avenue is designated as a minor collector street from SW Oak Street to SW Locust Street, The realigned right-of-way should •.g be provided by the applicant prior to the vacation of the 4' ' h' existing right-of-way. SW 92nd Avenue at SW Locust Street has a 50 foot wide right-of-way. Minor collector streets require a 60-V h` foot wide right-of-way and a 40 foot paved width plus sidewalks, streetlights, and associated underground utilities. Additional right-of-way will need to be dedicated along the SW existing 92nd M1 Avenue to create the 60 foot wide right-of-way required for a minor collector street. Since SW 93rd Avenue Will only intersect SW Locust Streeet, it is our opinion that most of the traffic coming to and from the site '' will utilize SW Locust. Street and only a minor portion will I utilize the SW Mapleleaf Drive access off of SW Greenberg Read • Half-street improvements are typically required for developments such as this on ad j acF,nt Since SW 93rd is Streets. Av currently unimproved and proposed to be realigned, 2/3 street improvements should be constructed as a minimum to provide for two-Way traffic. Right-of-way does not currently exist for SW NOVICE OF DECISION - T.RA£C 8 s CROW CO (SD R 85-12/v 8 5-17. /M 89- 11 PAGE 4 r • �•. � � � r T 45 1 Mn't r h u r . . , , . . /7 7 li.. 44, 4" . .d. • iD , . OL 93rd Avenue from Oak Street north approximately 280 feet. This , ... ' area is currently occupied by a private residence. The applicant has requested that he be able to form a Local , Improvement District to improve SW 93rd Avenue to full width from , e, SW Oak to SW Locust Street. The district would include - properties which would benefit from the SW 93rd Avenue link . .. - between SW Oak and SW Locust Streets. We are not opposed to this ' request provided the applicant is required to make the two-thirds improvements if the Local Improvement District could not be 'les .' formed prior to occupancy of the building or prior to any , . il ;.. increase in traffic onto SW Oak. Street, SW Locust Street or SW ''. ' ' Greenburg Road from this development. , 0 ',4 . A.:. b. The traffic study submitted estimates the vehicle trips generated ' .0, by this site to be approximately 1622 tripe per day. The study recommends the following: , • ',A '• • , 1. The existing signal at Greenburg and Mapleleaf remain as a , four-phase operation and be reviewed for interconnection . ,1 with the Highway 217 traffic signals to improve traffic .1s . ' circulation on Greenburg Road. . . • , 2. SW 93rd Avenue should provide access to the site from the south. L" „ 3. The Locust/Greenburg intersection be restriped to provide a r' left-turn and right-turn lane for westbound Locuet reet . . trffic i . 1 . ... We are in agreement with the total trip generation of this sita, 1 but do not agree with the above recommendatiems or t'ae , 1 If. ' ,. . distribution of vehicles onto SW Greenburg Road at SW Locust , , Street, SW Oak Street, and SW Mapleleaf Streets. The Division concludes that the Locust Street access to Oreenburg goad will carry much more traffic than shown on the traffic study. The . . traffic study shows the Lincoln Center V will generate ift the .. p.m. peak hours a total of 64 vehiceata at the SW Locust Street intersection of SW Greenburg Road, 101 Vehicles at the Mapleleaf A d I intersection of Greenburg Road, and 28 'vehicles at the SW 93rd Avenue intersection with SW Oak Street. It is Staff's opinion C { : that this distribution ehould be approximately 160 vehicles at the SW Locust Street intersection of SW Greenburg Road, and • approximately 30 vehicles at the SW Mapleleaf intersection of SW Greenburg Road. The SW Oak Street intersection will not be ' provided as part of this development and therefore will not provide access to the site. . .., ,. 1 ' , ) , The traffic study shows the total traffic oft Greenburg road in . the P.M. peak hour to be 1274 vehidles at the Locust Avenue intersection and 2551 vehicles at the Mapleleaf intereectipn. . IfNOTICE Or DECISION - TRAMMEL CROW CO (SDR 89-12/V 89-17/m 89-11) PAGE . el . . ,• , • al, , ■ `W4•.. , r T•, • Based on the site generated traffic distribution discussed above, . it appears that the intersection of Locust Street and Greenburg nn. Road meets the signal warrants #1, #2, and #11 as defined by the t p Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, therefore, requiring a ►' . • signalized intersection. •1, The installation of the signal at SW Locust Street will impact. the traffic flow of SW Greenburg, Road which is currently operating near capacity. We feel,, .that additional evaluation ;; .( should be performed on the impact of the signal on SW G,reenbur"i ''`asd ., Road and how this impact can be minimized. Improveme nts to SW Greenburg Road may eventually be required to. , ;'. • g Y eventually � increase, its �":•'; M capacity. The accesses to SW Locust Street from the parking garage are , ' ''; Shown to be approximately SO feet from centerline to centerline to SW 93rd Avenue and 65 feet from centerline to centerline to another access. SW 92nd Avnue, across Locust Street, is also r ' approximately 50 feet from centerline to centerline to. 93rd Avenue. We are concerted that traffic movements from',these two driveways will crklate an unsafe Situation for vehicles and ' ;; pedestrians. The location of the proposed accesses should be , • evaluated to deterimine their best location along SW .LoduOt Street ,, and along SW 93rd Avenue. d. The seven story office structure will b0 constructed over an existing parking lot, therefore the increase in etort► drainage for this area will be negligible. The parking Structure will be constructed over an existing' residential area, increa} ing the storm drainage runoff from this area. The storm will drain to the south and is proposed to be collected in the realigned SW 93rd Avenue roadway. The impact of this increased Storm drainage " Should be evaluated .to, insure that the increaead storm drainage 7` discharge will not adversely impact the properties downstream. s' The entire drainage basin for this storm water system should be 4 evaluated to insure that, with ultimate development, the proposed future storm drainage System within SW 93rd Avenue will provide adequate storm drainage capaoit , • e. It appears that adequate sanitary sewer facilities exist to provide service to the seven story office structure Washington County has proposed development and d submits E'• '�achin reviewed the + 1 . the following coMMents« All affected intersections operate at, near, or over capacity as Shown below: nte;section Las VAC leserv'e Capaoitt Greenburg/Locust P _ nOTICE OP bECXSION tRAMNUL CROW CO 4 r n r 1 • • '." Greenburg/S. 217 Ramp F 1„09 Greenburg/N; 217 Ramp E 0.94 • Gxe:~nburg/MaplEleaf E 0.94 4• Calculated stacking distances are just barely adequate or inadequate compared to available distances as shown below: Stacking Stacking Distance Distance.' -. Intersection Movement Required Available Greenburg/Mapleleaf t5 LT 495 ft. 500 ft. Greenburg/Mapleleaf WS LT 428 ft. 150 ft. Greenburg/N. 217 Ramp SB T 489 ft 500 ft. ,, As you can clearly stet operations at the S.W. Greenburg/Locust intersection are a serious Safety concert. Level of service at his •• location is "F” and signal warrant volumes are exceeded. Mitigation measures must be developed to elevate the level-of-service at ''this intersectgion to "'D" as required by Washington 'County!' Resolution and Order No. 83-2.9. Staff review suggests that signalization in - °'"., conjunction with signal interconnection for progressed traffic flow along Greenburg Road should be investigated. , ,0 •• '" Several previous phases of Lincoln Center were reviewed and approved ' 'o. by Washington County. Through these reviews and also through the 4 i. Metzger Circulation Study and recent Transportation Plan Update we have continued to review and observe the traffic circulation iesuee Yr associated with Washington Square and Lincoln Center. We are : '' extremely concerned that continued large scale development at Lincoln Center will exacerbate an already difficult situation. ' Additionally, our concern regarding Lincoln Center Five and associated ''; traffic impacts is heightened considerably by recent discussions. of , relocating Metzger School in order to facilitate continued easterly expansion of Lincoln Center by Trammel Crew. • We strongly believe that an appropriate condition of approval would require mitigation of traffic impacts. Obviously, full,mitigation of , the traffic impacts as a condition of approval will have a major 5,r p el,opment project. one " N, �,r„oncimic in1 act on the dev M �theless, it , i • o-ortant to ensure that existing 3:�tl,mi 1 stands to sanctioning traffic, : p rds for mobility, tra. capacity, and traffic safety are maintained prior t� g axe further development. ' . Washin gton County st ands ready to meet with re p re sentatxv' es of the City of Tigard, Oregon Department of Transportation, Trammel Cr ow and property ' , perhaps adjacent 7WIer� to disCUSa of impact� � .d .- prior to granting approvals of Lincoln Cent er Five. i . 89- ii M 8' i� NOVI O�� DECISION .� TRAMMEL CROW CO '(5DR e9��alz/V ,�. .,�, �, ) PAGE 7 s ` I • Northwest Natural Gas Co. comments that a one-inch line on the west side of the (vacated portion) of SW 93rd Avenue shouldn't affect the parking structure. ' No other comments were received. B. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION • 2itajayalsumalaraa- , Section 18.120.180 of the Tigard Community Development Code contains • standards whereby the Planning Director or designee can approve, approve with modifications, or deny a Site Development Review request. The proposed site plan meets Community Development Code standards for building setback and allowed uses in the C-P zoning district, but a discussion of access and egrets, signage, landscaping, automobile and ' bicycle parking, and building height is warranted. a. Access and Egress The small scale of the site plan makes the access in the parking structure nearest the Locust street frontage appear to be only 22 feet wide. Staff notes that section 18.108.080 of the Community - Development Code requires a Minimum pavement width of 24 feet for . two-way vehicular access drives. This 24 foot width should be maintained throughout the proposed development. The driveway spacing and location a0 submitted in revised civil drawings will need to be reviewed by the Engineering Division to fe access and egress to the site. .e ' b. Signage A request for sign review under the provisions of the City Sign Code has not been made in conjunction with this development review request, Staff notes that all new or proposed signage to be erected with this or any other phase of the Lincoln Center complex must be reviewed by the City prior to its erection* Any additional I ' freestanding signage will require a public hearing review by the Planning Commission because the site already exceeds the maximum allowable number of signs and poiseibly the maximum allowable area for freestanding Signs in the C-P zone as well. c* Landscaping • The landscaping plan 'submitted by the applicant shows generally where the landscaping is to be installed but does not indicate exactly where - specific types of vegetation are to go. The site plan also indicates that treee will be planted t two end z of proposed parking space rows. The Code does not allow trees to be within two feet of any permanent I ' NOTICE OP DECISION - TRAMMEL CROW ( DR 89-12/. 89-17/M 89-11) PAGE 8 , , , , •II e, ` hard pavement surface or walkway. It is not clear from the applicant's • submission exactly what these boxes will look like or how they will be • , , sited. All of these items can be addressed by requiring the applicant to submit a detailed landscaping plan. d. Automobile and Bicycle Parking • It appears that the total number of parking spaces is sufficient for this project both during construction and once construction has been , completed. A final parking space count should be verified with the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. • Again, due to the small scale of the site plan, parking space dimensions were difficult to determine. The Code requires these dimensions to be 9 feet wide by 18 feet in length. A discussion of parking space width and number of compact spaces follows later in this • report. Section 18.106,020(P) of the Code requires a minimum of one secure • bicycLe parking space for every 15 automobile spaces. This would mean at least 24 bicycle parking spaces need to be provided on a revised site plan. These spaces should be distributed throughout the project and a signifielnt percentage located on the lower level of the parking structure. The rack design should also be submitted for approval. e. Building Height The maximum building height allowed in the C-P zoning district is 45 feet. The applicant is requesting a Variance approval so that the • proposed Lincoln Center V building may rise 92 feet 6 inches feet to the roof line. An architectural design element or "appendage" will • rise another 14 feet in the center of the building facade but does not • count towards the overall building height. Building Height Variance_ay_12=111 • The proVisions contained in Section 18.98.020(A) of the Code allow relief • 0-. from the maximum building height requirements up to 75 feet provided all three exception criteria can be met. These Criteria require that a maxiMum height of 75 feet may be allowed in a commercial zone when 1) the total building floor area does not exceed 1.5 times the area of the site, 2) the ' setback equals at least one-half of the building height and 3) the structure does not abut a residential zone. The total building floor area will not exceed 1.6 tie S the area of the site. Since the building height will exceed 75 feet and the setback will be less than 46 feet, a Variance approval is necessary to allow the proposed height of 92.5 feet. Section 18.134.050 of the Code contains criteria whereby the Director can approve, approve with modifications or deny a • variance request. They are NOTICE OF DECISION - !TRAMMEL CROW CO (SDR 89-12/V 89-11/M 89-11) PAGE 9 1 • • (7 (1) The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this Code, be in conflict with the policies . of the Comprehensive Plan, to any other applicable policies ' ' of the Community Development Coder to any other applicable policies and standards, and to other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity. (2) There are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the applicant has no control, and which are not , applicable to other properties in the same zoning district; (3) The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this Code and City standards will be maintained to the greatest extent possible, while permitting some economic use of the b . land; , (4) Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not a ' limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic land forms or parks will not be advereely affected any more than would occur if . the development were located as specified in the Code; and (5) The hardship is not self-imposed and the variance requeSted is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardahip. The primary purpose of the Code height and setback requirements is to - 4 provide adequate light and space between buildings, particularly when different zoning districts are involved. Although the building height is , . taller than what the Code allows, the proposed angled 23 foot setback of 4 •. ' the building (only the corner of the building faces SW Locust Street) will result in a less imposing structure than with a 45 foot tall building with a 20 foot setback directly facing onto SW Locust Street which would meet Code standarda. Moreover, the building will be separated from adjacent reSidential properties to the north and northeast by the 70 foot wide public right-of-way of SW Locust Street. The distance of approximately 93 feet from the outermost building surface to the nearest residential property line to the north is approximately equal to the height of the building. ' \ Across the Street from the proposed site is one isolated ptoperty which is zoned R.-12, that is not under residential use, atid which is completely surrounded by C-P zoned land. Two other residentially zoned parcels lie on the southeastern corner of SW 98rd Avenue and SW Locust Street. The first parcel is likely to be most affected by the Shadows this new building might cause; howeVer, it should eventually be rezoned because of its isolation from other residentially zoned land and because ' it is no longer used for residential purposes, Existing physical and .. natural syStems, including traffic, will not be substantially affected to a worse extent than if the building met current City standards for building height. NOVICE OF DECISION - TRAMMEL CROW CO (SDR 89-121 17 8i7/M 89-11) PAGE 10 I ' I• " ^ Y •� - I' r l.. ., �. e d..:.....:,-.-.....r..4.J.....u..1;.+,....:.u...a..«.,..,wr.w..w ..1._.,.-„-.;f....x,,,....,....:1.... '�1 • .z.,.t...................-...rhl._.w.au,alr..u;.p,.....,.., ..,,a..,, :,a,...,,.,......,�d7»w«..r,.....l.,,...�..,__,4.i_...,,......�.,,..�:i ....,..J„,-..�.......... ......_..,..., _.._...w•,x.w..n.....,.....«�.a,..�...._«.,.,�,ay...:., .�i..�.,-..,...I..,..�,:..v1+•c,.,•�..-�a.-t. • A . parking Snag Width and Percent of"Compact Spaces y'ariancee The above criteria have also been adequately addressed by the applicant. The reduction in compact parking space width from 8.5 to 8 feet is minimal. The, Washington County, standard is 7.5 feet and the present parking lots are developed with this standard. Staff also finds no conflict in allowing up to. 45 percent of all parking spaces to be designated as compact spaces, so long as the total number of spaces for phase Lincoln Center is satisfied. • each se of t , Lot Line Asliustment (M B9-1J y, A lot line adjustment approval of the joint property line between tax • lots 2800. and 2901 (total area = 30,056 square feet, owned by the School , District) and ,tax lot 1004 ('total area 110,642 square feet, owned by Tratmel Crow) will be necessary because of the realignment of SW 93rd `_ Avenue. Tax lots 2800 and 2901 are located'at the southeastern cornea of I the intersection of° SW 92nd Avenue and SW Mapleleaf Street. Tac lot 1004 is at the southeastern corner of the Lincoln Center development. . �. Section 18.162.060 of TiJ ard's Community Development Code contains the I , • standards whereby the Director or his designee may approve, approve witYa Conditions, or deny a lot line adjustment request. These criteria. are: ”' t 1. An additional lot is not created by the lot line adjustment and the existing parcel reduced in size by the 'adjustments is not reduced below the minimum lot size established shed by the approved zoning for that district; • 2. By reducing the lot Size, the lot or structure(s) on the let will not be in violation of the site development or zoning '• ” district regulations for that district; In addition to the above criteria, the provisions of Code Section 18.162.040 shall also apply to lot line adjustments. ' • This section requires that • a) the proposal conforms with the City's comprehensive piano' all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations; b adequate at ) q e public facilities are available to serve the �� ' a proposal; proposed lots conform size and e n,,.. c) all prop nforis.► to' the a an dimensional' requirements of this title; and • d) all proposed improvements meet city and applicable a endy standards. ,y NOTICE OF bECISION TRAMKEL CROW CO (SDR 2V8' - NM 80-11) PAGE 11 F ' i III • i I No new lots will be created by this lot line adjustment. The area remaining to the east of the realigned SW 93rd Avenue will be the remainder of tax lot 2901. The Trammel Crow property immediately to the west of the realigned SW 93rd Avenue will increase by 6,188 square feet ,„ formerly in tax lot 28U0 and tax lot 2901, and will include the vacated right-of-way of SW 93rd Avenue between SW Locust and SW Mapleleaf Streets and tax lots 1004 (wouthern end of parking lot), 900 and 1002 • • (Lincoln Center V building and parking structure). . .4 No lots affected by this proposal will be smalle,0 than what is required in the C-P and R-4.5 zoning districts. Tax lot 2800 is considered a nonconforming lot in the R-4.5 zoning district because it is smaller than the minimum lot size requirement of 7,500 square feet. By including it with the properties immediately to the west, this nonconformity is V4• • eliminated. The reduced tax lot 2901 will still be well over the 6,000 •square foot minimum lot size in the C-P zone. All structures affected by this lc , line adjustment will retain adequate setback distance from pr,. xty lines. All proposed lot8, therefore, will conform to the size .d dimensional requirements of the Code. The lot line adjustment proposal conforms with the City's Comprehensive Plan and all statutory and orainanie requiremento and regulations. The proposal also conforms to the Metzger-Progress Community Plan which was recently amended to provide for the realignment of SW 93rd Avenue. The .. ' proposed improvements will satisfy City and other applicable agency , standards; the City will ensure that this is the case by imposing conditions of approval which must be satisfied prior to recording the lot line adjustment with Washington County. C. DECISION The Planning Director's designee for the City of Tigard hereby approves 8DR 89-12 and V 89-17 And M 89-11 subject to the following conditions: PRIOR TO USUANCE OF ANY PERMITS BEFORE THE APPEAL DEADLINE TO LUBA (LAND USE BOARD Or APPEALS) FOR CPA 89-05/ZC 89-05, THIS APPLICATION, (SDR 89-12/V 85-17/M 89-11) OR THE STREtT RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION FOR SW 93RD AVENUE (RESOLUTION 89-40), THE APPLICANT SHALL EkTER INTO A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WHICH HOLDS THE CITY HARMLESS IF ANY APP2ALS Or THESE THREE DECISIONS RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COSTS OR TIME DELAYS FOR 4•1/ THE PROJECT. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO RECORDING THE LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY: • !ir4 b 21'1 NOVICE OF DECISION - TRAMMEL MOM CO SE tt 89-12tV 89-17/M 80-11) PAGE 12 • ' 7., , A , • t 4 ". e ' , .t.:,.-ir..a...i-..,,._..., ...M,- 1.....,.,...._.,...ni,,.i...n..,,._...waLt .a.a.,,...;..,_.«„u...,.....,.,.. .,..m....,'.Wal...,.,..,. „. .,,...1-:,,_...-.. n....«a.«.,L�...,a.;..,..i:.1..�..- ,....x.;:.,._...:,i.,.. «....,..,.,.,,.,....,.;iS,U.,Jlln:..•.T.,.a1+„n..,.,r.M.,,,.+,-,x...:.i...-w".. M>'..:Jsx:,+..,.,--,,...:;:::....a.:»...',.wwuk_w...�.vu+:... .. • • ” w i 1. The applicant shall submit a map and new legal descriptions for all parcels involved in this decision for City staff review and approval. STAFF CONTACT: Jon Feigion, Engineering Division - ' (639-4171). hall .not' be recorded until the realignment 2. The Lot Line Adjustment s realignment SW 93rd Avenue has been completed. The description for both adjusted properties shall coincide with the new street alignment. STAFF CONTACT: Jon Feigion, Engineering Division (639-4171) . ' 4 THS FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A f. FOUNDATION PERMIT FOR THE OFFICE BUILDING AND PARKING' STRUCTURE: . the existing right-of-way for SW 93rd Avenue and for SW �• 3. Vacation of g Mapleleaf Street from 92nd Avenue to SW 93rd Avenue or a licensing :"'greement with the City shall be approved prior to issuance of a foundaticn permit for the parking garage. STAFF CONTACT: Randy ). Clarno, Engineering Division (639-4171) I 4. The existing accesses to the parking garage on Locust Avenue , shall be evaluated to determine the best location to avoid conflicting turning movements and sight distances. The location of the accesses shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to # . issuance of foundation permits. STAFF CONTACT: Gary Alfson, Engineering Division (639-4171) . } , 5. The applicant shall submit a revised site plan which provides: a) . for at least 24 bicycle parking spaces; the bike rack design shall also be submitted for approval; b) that all two-way access drives s, %. have a minimum pavement width of at least 24 feet; c) all parking spaces will have minimum dimensions of ,8 feet wide by fifteen feet long; d) a final count of parking spaces including i) the total number of parking spaces for Lincoln I, II, III and IV prior to construction; ii) the total number of spaces displaced! by the new ° ) • office building; iii) the total number of compact and standard 1 spaces proposed for Lincoln V; total number . n V� and iv) the er of` �,. remaining spaces for Lindoin I, II, III and IV after the Lincoln Center V development is completed; and e). all compact spaces shall be labeled the words "Compact Only" painted on each of be,Led are such with tI1 p the spaces. STAFF CONTACT. Deborah Stuart, Planning Division (639-4.171) ONLESS OTBERwisic NOTED, THE FOLLOWING CONDITI ONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR E ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. ... 6. The applicant Shall satisfy the conditions of all previous applications, 5 87-08 07, related to traffi; and drainage im improvements.nts. � STA STAFF CONTACT: Gary ALfson, Engineering Division; (639-4171) . NOTICE OF DECISION - TRAMMEL CROW CO (SDR 8 PAGE • 7. The applicant shall re-w.-aluate the Mapleleaf signal prior to , making the improvements required by the previous application (SDR 87-08), to ensure the improvements will accommodate the additional f traffic from Lincoln Center V. STAFF CONTACT: Gary Alfson. 8. The applicant shall provide for the dedication of additional right-of-way according to the proposed realignment of SW 93rd Avenue to provide for a 60-foot wide right-of-way as required for minor collector streets prior to or in conjunction with the vacation of the existing right-of-way of SW 93rd Avenue. The right-of-way shall include the existing right-of-way for 92nd Avenue. Right-of-way Lilian also be dedicated for the Locust Street improvements. The dedication document(s) shall be on City forms and approved by the Engineering Division. Dedication forms and instructions are available from the Engineering staff. STAFF CONTACT: Jon Feigion, Engineering Division (639-4171) . 9. Sufficient bonds to guarantee the construction of standard two third street improvements, including concrete sidewalk, driveway apron, curb, asphaltic concrete pavement, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, streetlights, and underground utilities, shall be approved for the 93rd Avenue frontage improvements as shown in the submitted plans. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to minor collector street standards, Two third street improvements shall consist of a minimum of half-street improveMents plus 10 feet of additional pavement. The improvements shall be constructed from Locust Street to the point approximately 280 feet north of Oak Street at the end of the exiting right-of-way of 93rd. STAFF CONTACT: Gary Alfson, Engineering Division (639-4171). 10. The applicant shall provide sufficient bonding to guarantee the • construction of a signal at the intersection of Locust Street and Greenburg Road. The applicant shall provide additional traffic engineering and analysis to determine the operation of the signal including phasing, timing and inter-connection with other Greenburg Road signals and impacts to SW Oreenburg Road. STAFF CONTACT: Gary Alfson, Engineering Divieien (635-4171) . 11. Conditions numbered 9 and 10 shall be waived if a Local Improvement District is formed prior to occupancy to improve SW 93rd Avenue, full width from SW Oak to Locust Street to minor collector standards and install a signal at Loeust Street and 4 Greenburg Road designed to limit the impact to traffic on Greenburg 1 Road. Improvements to Greenburg Road, if required according to the additional traffic engineering analysis* shall also be included. STAFF' CONTACT: Cary Alfson, Engineering Division (639-4111) 6 12. The applicant shall obtain a facility permit from the Department of Land use and Transportation of Washington County to perform work in the right-of-way of Greer:burg Road. Thia will include satiSfactory resolution of the traffic issues noted by the County , on pageS 6 and 7 of this decision. A dopy shall be provided to the NOTICE or DECISION - TRAMMEL CROW CO (SDR 89-12/V 89-17/k 89.11) PAGE 14 » . ; City Engineering Division prior to issuance of a public improvement permit. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Division (639- 4171) 13. The applicant shall`demonstrate that the storm drainage runoff can ' be discharged into the existing drainageway without significantly impacting properties downstream. Improvements shall be extended to . 4Q Locust Street to connect with the existing system. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Division (639-4171) . 14. Sanitary sewer and storm drainage e details le shall be provided as part of the public improvement plans. Calculations and a • topographic map of the storm drainage basin and sanitary sewer service area shall be provided as a supplement to the public improvement plans. Calculatiens shall be based on full ., development of the drainage basin. The location and capacity of the existing proposed and future lines shall be addressed. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Division (639-4171) : 15 Seven (7) sets of plan and profile public "immprovement construction plans and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a Registered Professional Civil Engineer, detailing all proposed • public improvements shall be submitted tt ed to the Engineering Division isacn for approval. Two (2) sets of plan and profile plans shall bis • submitted for preliminary review prior to submittal of. ,,final plans. STAFF CONTACT: Gary Alf son, Engineering Division (639-4171). 16. Construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence • until after the Engineering Division has approved public improvement plans'. The Section Will require a 100% performance assurance or letter payment e� r . of commitment, a developer-engineer agree�tent, the a mentof a permit fee and a sign installation/streetlight t i thg o e per mit fee. Also, the execution of a street p �, or construction compliance agreement shall occur prior to,, or concurrently with the he i sce o of approved pub, is ' improveme n plans. STAF F CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Division (63�9�- 4171). 17. An agreement Shall be executed by the a licant, on forms . ' ., '.. provided by the City, whi h waives the p roperty owner�s ri ght to oppose or remonstrate against a fut ure Local Im p rovement ris trict formed to , Complete 93rd Avenue between Locust and oak Streets. STAFF, CONTACT: Jon. Fey. on Engineering,ineeri,' ' CONTACT: � Feigion,r ` g `rig�Div'.:®ioirl (639-41/1) . •e 18. Stree t centerline monurnentation shall be provided aS follows: a) Centerline Monumentation. accorda nce 1) .. � with Oregon �Stafa tes �� 92,060k � regon Rev'aaed � subsea ion 2 iof.�the oe inetl street and ect � ( � ) � Merl � of � all roadway rights-of-way shall be mkonu 'ented before the dity pt s a street 'irmproverrtent • aces t N � � PAGE 15 .�t�=Cry OF DE�:I TR�l; MOW co Sblt, 89-1 /V 9 17/1� 89-11) 1 • , „o . • k \ , . . 2) The following centerline monuments shall be set: •, A) All centerline-centerline intersection points. . . B) All cul-de-sac center points. . C) Curve points, beginning and ending points (P.C. 's and P.T. 's) . - b) Monument Boxes Required 1 . 1) Monument boxes conforming to City standards will be required around all centerline intersection points and cul-de-sac center points. ' , 2) The tops of all monument boxes will be set to finished ' pavement grade. STAFF CONTACT: Ton Feigion, Engineering Division (639-4171) . . 19. The applicant hall complete any half-Street improvements to Locust Street not improved by the Major Streets Bond Project or • . revised by the site improvements. STAFF CONTACT: Gary Alfson, Engineering Divison (639-4171). 1 • 20. The applicant shall submit a revised, detailed landscaping plan which indicates; a) the exact location of epecific landscaping materials; b) the design profile of the landscaping planters , . proposed to go in the parking lot area: and c) an irrigation plan. , • DURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE OFFICE BUILDING, PARnING FACILITY, AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: t 21. No construction shall be allowed to take place between the hours of • 9:00 p.m. and 700 a.m. 22. All construction materials Shall be stored on-eite. 23. The applicant shall ensure that off-street parking be provided for all constrtction-related vehicles and trailers. i . . 24. The applicant shall ensure that flagmen be provided when , construction vehiclee are blocking public streets. 25. thiring construction of the site improvements, the construction traffic shall aCcess the area from Greenburg Road only All vehicles and construction-related equipment shall be perked on the site. No vehicles shall be allowed to park on SW Oak, SW tocust Streets or SW 93rd Avenue whith are related to the construction of the subject improvements inCluding employees, Odbdontractors, Material deliveries, etc. NOTICE OF DECISION - TRAMMEL CROW CO (SDR 89-12/V 89-17/N 89-11) PAGE 16 . , , ... p, , . , . t' * 7 , '\ A , l , '' 26. All landscaping materials and other proposed site improvements shall be installed or financially assured prior to occupancy of any structures. STAFF CONTACT: Deborah Stuart, Planning Division (639-- �., 4161). I 27. A City sign permit shall be obtained prior to the erection of any identification wall or freestanding signs. Sign location and size must be in compliance with Chapter 18.114 of the Community Development .Code. STAFF CONTACT: Deborah Stuart,, Planning Division ('639-416l'),, • THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN SIGN (18) MONTH: OF THE FINAL DECISION DATE NOTED BELOW. PROCEDURE ' 1. Notice: Notice was published in the, newspaper, posted at City r, Hall and mailed to: XX The applicant and owners Owners of recOrd within the required distance XXX The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization XuX Affected government agencies 2. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON 6116i'19 UNLESS AN APPEAL 18' FILED. 3. AoAea]. Any p a rty to the decision may appeal this decision in • accordance with Section 18.32:290(A) and Section 18;32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that aY written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder w.,thin' 10 days after notice is given and, City Hall,1 Appeal 13125 SW �3a11 a81'vc�.,,s are available at Tigard w , Tigard r Oregon The deadline for filing of an appeal in 33O .p.111.._§. ..fi gg s • 4. Questions: If you have questions, please call City of Tigard Planning Department, City of "Tigard City Sall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon PRE- P> r Y Stuart,b� � Asst Asst. DATE . APP- ROVED 31. Keith S. Liden, Senior Planner D J E 12 SDR F39�• n dad V 09-17/M N dig 1 . PAGE 17 • t'. I fnJ . 11 . ' 1 - { «. ...«, .•....,_ ..._ .,. .. ..... .___ - . rl«.y..G..{..„r...,.wl.,l;«.,tr[.l._.,w.....•4.v .. arwr,..-...wr1...r— ..e. w - .,.._...... , ..., ,.. .. . i . i, r .r a F r w.-_ ..: .., S " 7)R" n 89-112/v 89-1.7 KATHLEEN E RUSSELL ROEPKF LINCOLN CENTER ASSOC.', LTD. . , ' LINCOLN CENTER FIVE ' ' ' 9245 SW LOCUST W:[tL CORP. ' . TIGARD OR 97223 . 117 SW TAYLOR ' ' PORTLAND OR 97204 5202 & 5203 1002 & 1003 u ' :,.,MICHAEL L & JOYCE RUFF CROW-SPIEKER-HOSFORD #'117 ' ;; 12150 SW,124TH AVENUE PO BOX 5396 ' PORTLAND OR 97223 : PORTLAND OR 97228 a' 5600 & 5601 2800,'.2901, & 3300 ' ' '. q DONALD &,'JOYCE SCHARBROUGH, SCHOOL DISTRICT #23J ' 10050, SW 92nd 13137 SW ,PACIFIC HIGHWAY PORTLAND OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 ' 5602 MA1 JOR'Y HAGLUND MARILYN HERHSTER &' DEAN WEBER '.- '• 11075 SW HALL BLVD 9175 SW 'LOCUST ST.REE'.P . . ' TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD OR 9722; 470E 500 . :. DONALD B POLLOCK & RICHARD DORIS, KLE J NPELL ' CARPENTER 9220 SW LOCUST 1 13570,NW BURTON PORTLAND OR 97223 22 O . L D 012 97229 A P AN R'� 4800 & 4801 501 1 BRUCE H MILLER &�� ROBERT ANDREW'W & HAROLD''.SNYDER MATHESON &` DIANE BAKER 12290 SW FOOTHILL DRIVE 9495 SW LOCUST PORTLAND OR 97225' ' ' ' ' ' PORTLAND OR'97223 „I ' ,. ,'4900 : : ' 600 IRTCHARD° BO UMIL :JAMES: BAKER BRIAN D & TERESA JbEAN , - " I' 1 ,9445 SW. LOCUST 9,225 SW .MAPLE LEAF ' PORTLAND OR PORTLAND OR 97223 5000 700 MI CHAEL L PRESLEY G.D: MAti�k�R 2517 QUEBEC MARTHELL'E M HILL 9260 SCI LOCUST EUGENE OR'.97401 PORTLAND OR 97223 0 BR RALVF SON HARRY. & BEVERLY :BRIAN L & A1V'ITA �. ,. LY A' L1705 8 10180 $W' 93RD AVENUD' ' 9355' SW LOO'UaT TIGARD OR "97223 PORTLAND. OR 97223 0 5 702 11. 'HERBERT . ` GIwA SLAUGHTER BARRY C ,�I & GEOR BAR ELM ' 1. 93'35 SW LOCUST ST ' , 5 SW' MAPLEiLE PORTLAND'OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 4 r i �o a a i 9a tl ,ii MARVIN' L''THEOMNES &'MA'ROORIF'' OW SPIHI�.!,R-�HOSFORD $x'88 ' 10 CR L tl25'' Sid UE . 92ND.AVENUE,. 2601 'SW GREENBURG RUA,Dt #75'0 ' ' PORTLAND on. 97228 PORTLAND OR' 97221 ' x, r , « a ' n f. � � _ L CIT : OFTWARD. , - 13125 S.W. Hall:Blvd. } = RQ r Box 23397 Tigard,Oregon 97223- • INGRIM/MALLS P._C. OM CELL TERPOINTF, DR _ LAKE: OR 97035 t OFTWARD ___ k 13125 SW Hall Blvd - i - - P Oa Box 23397 f Tigard,Oregon 97223 t. BRAN MSLL CROW CO.: °-_ _ - 10260 SW GREENBURG z. TIGARDE OR 9f223 i. t , I r 7, ' '1'0 ,r°�',c7 7 I L M1 •t Itier), N 1 1 1 .-- —,:-- —1-- --, ---- — -- -- — ,—,- ' I 4 ry�) 1 1 All i. r '/ �r ,.... . ....... e'/' 1 1 1'1 11 e' ,ter I 11 i 1 it I /l Sid �•'''"�� ,/ ' � � ' ' I I l 1 / I II ia. I to ,,./ II it . , II II 1 dii 1 , P AVE. �� ,5!is, F,„'.. .• 1 95th AVE ' j� cn___....ii , . . „.4 . . 1 . , to ii r Nvi : m !To r ,il, ." -0............_......_..... Lt_ rn 90th 7 'AVE, °----- 1. 3!d)1h i • S.W. 89 t AVE. I �' S.VI�� EFFERSON z ST. an I. pp . y , _,, to 1 S. 87th AVE. �_ I mos 1 9 1 I * ' Ihillihii....„_''''... ..---i'l) 4 I' III ,S.w _ "�STH 111 AVE. • , Li_i 1______//,..._i . „. 1 a i i 9L..„,..w......... .M,.",,..,,.....,.......,.+..,.,1..+...n—..,,-.,,_,,,o.Y.,..a...;.t...,I,.. a,,..,,»:.L.,,..•...-i«...if„-,..-1 .»b.;4 .w.,,. .....n.:..,u.+.-.4••..:.••,,..:..:.,:».«.,.....'J....:r.:...-r'.wf' . iak.#,...,—,..,—«—....,.i,.,«...i.,._.,...,u......,,i...,—...m.,,,,,..„,«,,A,r Air,...r.✓..,..c:,,n....,.,..i ,.....-. • ,1 tw. ii u, 1. • MEMORANDUM TO: Building Division i` FROM: Keith Liden, Senior Planner / L-'''' L i RE: Lincoln Center V (SDI. 89-12) conditions of approval • DATE: 6/9/89 On June 6, 1989, the Planning Division approved the above development subject to 27 Conditions of approval. Conditions 3 through 5 are shown to be satisfied prior to issuance of foundation permits. Conditions 6 through 20 are intended to be completed before,building permits are issued. ,,„ The applicant bas requested that a permit for the building shell be .allowed after compliance- with conditions 3, 4, and 5 a'td holding the issuance of the ' building permit for interior work including electrical, mechanical, and plumbing until Conditions 6 through 20 are satisfied. This minor amendment to the timing for satisfying the conditions has been approved by Ed and myself. It will allow for the construction to proceed while the traffic studies and organization of an LID are being completed. It is anticipated that the °full" building permit will be requested during the later part of Augusta . ty i ¢` i • d: David Blake: , d'; r: y, I. • G A 1 • • ?• • • • � I NOTE TO THE FILE A copy of the 'Director's Decision has been sent to: Dr. Gene Davis 4550 SW Lombard Beaverton, OR 97005 • • • • • .r. I , I I I I . l • • • • 4 • • • • I , S • • '4 r. 'SITEDEVELOPMENT'REVIEW SDR 8942 VARIANCE V 89-17 LOT LINE 1: ' • ADJUSTMENT'M"89-11 LINCOLN CENTER FIVE.1 PO# 8'The Director* '', `. has approved subject toy editions a request to construct a 125,000 square • ' foot office building wit', two story parking garage and a 93 foot tall building where a maximum height of 45 feet is required.Also approved is a ' Lot Line Adjustment to modify two parcels of 30,056 and 110,642 square €• , " .. j. feet into two parcels of 23,868 and 116,830 square feet. ZONE: OP Com- "J. mercial Professional) LOCATION: 10260 SW Grcenburg Road (WCTM 151 a • • • 35AB,tax lots 500,501,600,700,701,702,900,1002,1004,2800,and 2901) '.• � � ._.. � ;• � fw it � .�N Arl[ a• Y � � � � ^�` � �{,� tom#. w'�•ILS.� ;r ' i 'Psi, _,.. i .r►A� , , t 1 ,.., ..-.t..-.:-.- * , . . 1-1 'AC" a ‘ ill! '1 dal sr : . ., 0 1 I A . ` t r 1 �. i , L �'- •N I I ,-. . • ' s TWO'�\`�...... ' � I � �, � 1,� �I r..�.__�,Y...T._..r...1 . l SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR .3940 TIM FOUNTAINS CONDO- ' • •. • : MINIUMS NPO # 6 The Director has approved subject to conditions a request for Site Development Review approval to amend the approved, ' ` a developed site plan for the Fountains at Summerfield condominiums to eliminate one access to the development by extending the existing brick wall along the development's northern boundary across the existing access to Naeve Road. The approval allows closing the access to through traffic, ',j' TIMES 1 only if an emergency access on Naeve Street is provided..The 110 unit development would continue to be served by three other accesses:ZONE: ' ' P.0.BC R-25 (PD) (Residential,25.units/acre-Planned Development)LOCATION: 1:, .r . Naeve Street(WCTM 2S1 10DB,Supplemental Map No.1,tax lot 90000) , J%'••: -r ' I 1,...:r„.' �74 r�7r,. Il 1 y' '^ i• 1 /''�//S�}I. �,.,,,,jf ''',..t.,_, • ' :'p �. • 6 JJJ ' .%7.�' �,, 4 • i SITE.* i -�-- CITY OF TIGARD '` .,p,� /1/ w `��qy' •" a.: P. O. BOX 2397 �Ytr'r' 1,` 1 � i r..,i �,,;� ;, , • TIGARD OREGON 97223 S� '� ;; ._ , < <%�,' mac'/jJ��,� r l ii/00 -,� ��F..;�. 4w r fa, I . NZ ' a� , � "" 1 • AFFIDAVIT or PUE3l #5 The D rector has approved subject to conditions a r'eq co INVESTORS NPO. STATE ). tiori of an approximately 45 000 square foot warehouse and associated construe- 1 " for to •,f • ss. work, t i sso anted si - f�<iFi^''�, E(7F0 c: COUNTY WASHINGTON, ) work,ZONE:I-L (Light Industrial) LOCATION,Bonita'Road,east of South DORTIiA'MARTY ern Pacific Railroad,riight-of right-of-way WCTM 2S1 12A13,tax lot 1300) �r''r •: Director or duly 1 i . and 'say �,i �,�� r�'t' ' �,:.., „ . being first dill sworn, depose -: • '' - �.1. i pr nC pal clerk, of the... NIT 1 • �,.. I. r, : \ -34 g i , rj `' 1, of eneral circula hi�� ;.�,, n•��� 1 � � • , � a newspaper ig and 190.020, published at__ ._ �-, :=1*iN d 3 i ° ' i �' aforesaid county and state; that the a ii." ■ ir•it i-Y•ir'�/i;+YYY\ 1 u��T>J L?�VELOPNIL� '� IAr>~n - M i )Si- NT RIVEW � i ! . '. L�' ,,,ri‘ ,Yi •I J CI i a printed copy of which 1's hereto anise � 'S rx-� ►.lip= L .V th afli� i rI e f W rig �su.s. lira 1111 1111 M.IIIIIIM Ns 1 - -no IN•-• The adopted finding o facts,'decision, and stateMent of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard Civic Center, 13125 SW . • a Hall Blvd:,Pi0 Bo*23397,'Tigard,;Oregon 97223,The decision shall be'final j. 1085 nhp � decision � �3�al this decision in • --`� , a ccordance With Section 18��29�(A) aod5ect1o1837h of the Cbmlnu- . . Subsce ed and S . o before n'e thI; nity Development Code,Which provides that a written appeal may be filed -' within 10 days after notice is given and sent.The deadli�nehl be lot an trir .4 AN, appeal Is 3:30 PM Jane 0� 198'9.The hearing on an appeal Will • RESIDENTS WITHIN 250 FEET OP PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY Tax Tax x Map No. Name and Addresses 4701 1S126DC Donald E. Pollock and t Richard L. Carpenter 13570 N.W. Burton Portland, OR 97229 . 4800 1S126DC Bruce H. Mi.12 ?r and 4gof Robert T. Mats,eson and r. Diane R. Baker 9495 S.W. Locust ,. Portland, OR 97223 1S126DC Bruce ,. Miller and. Robert Ma heson and Diane R. _ er { (loc. 948• S.W. Locust) 9495 S. , . L*cust Portland, OR 97223 4' 4900 I� 1S126DC Richard M. Bo umil and a 9 James B. Baker 9445 S.W. Locust Portland OR 97223,' V.? 5000 �sn 1S126DC G.D. Maurer 2517 Quebec 'r r Eugene, OR 97401 5100 1S 12 60C Harry and Beverly A. Loan 9365 S.W. Locust Tigard, OR 97223 1S126DC Her. D. and Georgia Slaughter � 5101 1 beet 0. �' • 9335 S.W. Locust St... Portland, OR 97223 500 15126DC Ma rvin L. Theonnes & Marjorie 10025 S.$V'. 92nd Avenue Portland, OR 9723 Kathleen E. and R Roepke 1, 5201 �12�DC tsse�.�. Roe ke 9245 S.W. Locust • Tigard, OR 97223 'r ,411P • a., ,.7'' v ''''' y w_.:.���...._..w.,,w.«..;i u...u..,w,.:uc.,...Qw.ha.!-f�AAa.:..:..!-.x.:.i�W-r„..tr.',�._-.w�..o.,u:.,....��,- ....,�.»..,w.a.,-,.,ww...r;..r x.,.- -,. • ,,,..J.«uM,•,.i�.�",•�T..�,•.w.U..�n x•�._ti:.,.•.}.aw.r�.uw.4..�.-._,�.....ax�.h..w..-....a� n�....,.•. .,, .,... �, .,. „ . / 4 •,,,x a t:'`: 5202 1S126DC Michael L.& Joyce Ruff 12150 S.W. 12 4th ;Avenue Portland, OR 97223 15.126DC Michas .L.& J c-e Ruff 9 oust St. (loc. 2/4I 41 12150 S 4th Avenue i Portl nd, OR 7223 . 5 600 1S126DC Donald & Joyce Scharbrough bP 10050 S.W. "92nd ; Portland, OR 97223 1 .. 1S126DC Joy Trout harbrough' : ... Pore-and, OR 97223 5602 1A126DC Marilyn Herbster and ;:'. Dean Weber . 9175 S.W, Locust Street U Tigard, OR 97223 1 , I r M , 4' i I it 1tt 1' 1 1 ■ II � M I 9 T RESIDENTS WITHIN 250 FEET OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY Tax Lot No. Tax' �iap_ 'Nor Name and Addresses 500 1S135AB Doris Xle,inpe1l, • ;F"" , 9220 S.W. Locust , f r I I Portland, OIL 97223 • 501 1S135AB Andrew W. and Harold C. Snyder 12290 S.W. Foothill Drive • Portland, OR 97225 Brian D. 600 � � � � 1S135AB a and Teresa J. Bean 9225 S.W. Maple Leaf Portland OR 97223 . ' I , 700 1S135AB Hichael L. Presley Marthelle My Hill 9260 S.W. Locust Portland, OR 97223 , 701 1S135AB Brian L. and Anita E. Halverson 10180 S.W. 93rd Avenue Portland, OR 97223 o rm 702 1S135AB Barry C. Helm a 92251 S.W. Maple Portland, OR 97223 900 1S135AB Crow=-Spieker-Hosford 48 O f3 e .e ea „. 10260 S.W. Creenburc , Road, #750 Portland, OR 97223 1: r 1000 1S135AB Lincoln Center' Assoc., Ltd. l• WRL Corp. 117 S.W. Taylor . Portland, OR 97204 i 1002 1S135AB Orow-Sp,zeker�k�o sf ord #117 bt ` -(1cc. "+{4 2 G e is g = dl� P.O. BoX 5396 ��' P Portland, OR 97228 I �I, 1003 1S135AB O -Spieker- osfard #65 (lo'(lo'd 105 seen ►t rq Road) P.O. 5396 Port 'and/ 97228 I i i I' I -.,�,_.,. .,. � -,..,..w...,�,.A�•.�i- .,,-- ....�ww...n..�.., .._n _ ._ ,..._n.,r-.-.-« ...�.... ............,a,.a.wi.a..a.Mf...»..a�....../:.1.....:.114',..........+,..,. ,�,..... �,.,., .. -,- ..�.�wrw,...n..a,+u a.........k.....,,.,.-, ..-.�a..,..�.. .� • -0 --- 1S- 5-5-A3 , Crow-Spie e l osford #88 10260 S. reenburg Road, #750 Portlan , OR 97223 2800 1S135AB School District #23JT 1 S.W.9( 13137, ..:. Pacific Hwy. Tigard, OR 97223 . I ,,. 2-9411, 1S135AB School ► 'str 230'T (lac, 927i apleleaf) 13137 S.W fie Hwy. r 1. .�a. apt„d , R 97223 r CJ 4.1 10 13 5AB School choc�. Oi •.tri A, #23J' (loc. 1040' 93rd Avenues 13137 S. . 'pacific Hwy. Tigard, OR -7223 q • " , 1 I I I 1 I i , I e - • . p` r �^ I `\` ,W.,BIRCH ST., - ._..•_...� �,. y J ■ I O r. 1(1, /' - + -�,_ I .�•EAPSRCR''S!+ w I I \i /1 11 --'� h--- 5T `t M Y ■ ir,aI 5w• .'•^ I I 'CHE r 'l' I I �P�,"I. •` o /,! II + WASHINGTON w hi go s �' I -T p I I. -- 4 l7Ltr�n W ml.rimpwl� 1 • \ \,I I r, 1 i. j t® :Eel I wi E BORDERS'■ / ■■ . i ^ A• 4 I CRESCENT GROVE — ,. I • - I . EL_.___ ■ L.,m4. 1PII sL Hk'MLOCK . . . 1 I MALL + i 11-�CEMETARY=:x_.I �a w __ s I —I I II _ � ,� Io mom. `, I I i' m III 1111' I cJ�AL • ■STREET 1 SMf'LARCH• • VMS \. +----1 11......_ __ .- ■ 26.25 s•.w.LE I MNN, )3 5 1 , `\ + t _HI_ ■ HI_ J�■ �■1:.1 I - in.'� , ______�_� _ s �■ " L^.BUST :� W FL", v s.w. 1A,,'EL EAF' ST _ r 'O N " ■■ L ■ ✓ T �� ,' 1� • .w . '. In- ■a■■ I I i 1 ; ii. 4 — FFF*-.. . ,. ,. ,.. . _____ ...., „...-......,_ z I, sw... E. rim al \ ...... , SAM. 01111 ST. \ / /\\ ............/ lii . L. IN • al - \ '4, •••• ill _1 ,/ 2 NI \\\ �/ am` \ 4 -1 ,/ sb, Ill/ , ' --\ .. un 1 :iii t----__"'- , . — 19 , ■ ■■ \, - SHb°Y LH. a S.W� IN ■ T , ,:. Gt-V0, .� i a 7 ja. ■ 1 - t .., T� �.- a T}♦ORIV s.� „. ' .1 ). itterdigs—et vi.u..F ' , t.,J, i , -,,,,OSD' PL.'a ,•' '� ' / M\ t I■ STEVE Q 2,■94,'N.,-_=,.-, .......w..-..,-iin • IV a OM ' ,-----,/,,,' = ";r4" — mai E i as ...„, . - ._...7 i e) 0. HDRTII DAKOTA. . ' - 0 I. _■n ■II6 J ;7 ;E7TI ; >r„� ® INN` m■ 'M , . , .. ,•• , , , ,A • 46, , riult IMP i NI ,,,7 °"' N Ini il II ME pp, s , : . . iii ...In . mg - fr.: ,.., — 4 Z l'i liwx,.., - Fr : III *N7 I .1„,!q 11- ' ' N. \ \ ' . . -i ,41/4t- lwili iiii mil_ ---iii , I .4aw AI a 111 TAIIOELA T, --1 i '} im — • 4v4 \A \\ .'' I. oak 'p¢✓ • T OELA .....11, M, \,,1- ,rte`,• sw• • if AIRiY3iFiM1/s� 46 = : > \\,,,,,7-1,11 Ai " it .W�, r�egRp. r�Cp4 �` �t4 2 I 4-..„,, 4, 41„,,,,„ ,,,,,, c.,,,,,,,.„ .4,0,4 1 sw>,,,, („7-.4 woobAtio . w H 40., -...c.,...,,,44,,_. 4e# ,„x a d. . p! PARK om Am N i .,,,,,,,,--e..,_ , ,11,,,,„ ,,,,, 6 jt� .�, C dONk 04 ` �ryy.aY; #4ta :11"t Ila Cs-.■,_.. ' '1 1 • s.w Jb ,r' '•L,' 11,-4.ir.4, it* c'4' / . ,, *- p i . fi WAS ING'I UN UUUIV 1 Y, Ut-ttuty ' t � � SCALE 1". 100 Y ' SEE MAP I I 1' i➢ r r0 .,, e://,,S .4Ii////'//I'14 1),4/.!//i/4'///////J//!"////////1///1/1/iii//!J/✓///r'/://✓✓AY.%l:'///'/✓//!✓/////✓//)✓. !%//I//////f.////i/////////////////////%///r'////////.%//////%/17/0%4//// ��G/�GiI' //✓✓// 7'///// ///////J: 31N, CR,75 ' ) 50 Y 50 50 50 �, 50 50 575-1- 5 5o ? 50 55 act 50 50 •- 50 50' 406,50' 32't.9F3' • . 000 1 1 � loOc I 0,32 AC. 491 AC 4 I 3 ? 1 9 16 4 3 2 . I dI N�... 55Ac:'• 2I :©113 5 I2 °'I L.:.i 18 I �. I� °I`; i.i 12 5 8 12 in " a.i+ co 5.�. N z.t.t 100 _, ,. . . 1. • . `4 J..:! '' • "�" "�, NEB• ' • • A..W IC 0 _ .91wo i.w. I (m 6 11 O I a u•......e 12 � 6 1 y/1 n ere 1 • h.Yc 1— • P.w. f4 (f) o r D 2=•!• ••, . . III I 1 x I I � z ' 721 Ia 7 8 9 10 °I I2 7 8 9 togI 1O7 8 9 1� + , o L- 50 So ./- 5n -4- Po _4 1.., . :-b. 59 -- -- 52 ,..d-: tC - L.,. 50 00 5° :.-.. 50 , . M7 r' �' VACATED �R/0 79-127 ..*:...VV.0 VACATED u/0 78!-232 L r 100.04 1' M M t '' ,l. . �o �Y 4� Ea" `t 50 �"' S0 `�'" 50 :t 'tom .o �Y'" 50 �' S0 '`fi' so y1 `� 5a -r �o i1i r. s g 1 I 1 1 rr".5o ``� 1; #59d 31'z1" I j •b (. b 34,38 ,--'-'""�-00°X45'E a Q 1 F2 o 4 3 2 1. 8I I2 +--"3 N 1 +5( I2" 4' 3 1 a r.' `�w ,� 1004' 1 --7 i , ,I .11� .:�```2�'h'�� G�,�41Q+C, T ao f . .:;,,,c dL 4.6- + . _ 4 N� 4 :, :,L .1 , 1 ►�I ki. k'1g S 14 86 O -:. AK, 1 61,F'144.6 j° 5' I 12 , ° t ' A Lt.!w ' I I =13�8a 9 - $4 i! I 1 4 �} i .a'co ,, _ N 59` 30 . `�62 tgI :`: 12 6 11 01 g �6��` 260`1.5/....E 0 �t: h 6 11 ' to ... . 4 �E.4 -1 �s • O 'N+� I 69.65 � S�o�. gI ;1S ,7 10 pIIA Lt ' �I �r 10 g1 , I° VA � 16� ° . I � I �' �, 3,40,46". . 1 I 1 9 °I. (. I° 8 9 � I I8 1 8 9 2 t., a _, =-, �5 1 l,bq ,� fog „ , 50 :too �� ,�e 100 3 Z& too too �y 'rr' VJ TE+ f10 ,2185 'Y' .. 5.173 `"_ 103,05 ' `�` Jf///� ///�i��',�./.fff,�/,j/Jr�f.4�/i.'/„�'�'' /r'" 1,,00"//" �•�.. //, , ,, ., r ��ri rrir .'��i�s���i 1,, +22 CHS, T ;22 CH S: 5p 4.12'CHS,1 T'0 N B.• z2 E , ibb ICAO �,b 50 ib 00 7, �. . T. l •• • ! Q n ! u r •o•_ '• • III p� r • rwr,r.3 n..J V�,nw...L.,..Lr,rtF+]I{..L:..,, +-4-r.4r.r-a.,J 1,J1 ter. ..»a7���,-er iwwr..,,t.e nd>.,. ,a•..+a,....:Je.4 W..,t..r.4.<LAW...41,1..w.H-.v..nano.«fir-+r....1.w,,.-a..4n.wlwJl r...a.w.rtinr.r•-..-rAln,+--.....1«l.+A.riWl a.J...JU.......a✓r_wa....,t.._...WL1.:+-+111....Y.J..++:.._..._,.+r:.l...r._.,_,w.L.44;V'+wl«' 11.:+.. .r a..»r•+ L.4 • .4..n1 I A.:1=n• rletr"G4 ww.1 rie My } ‘,.11111111111.1113,1111111M1111.1.111111011111M , • 111111111111111101MOMOMEry BEQUEST T FUR COMMENTS + ,:Y f • TO: t::: ��L DATE: May 5 1289 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SDR 89-12 LINCOLN CENTER FIVE For approval of a Site Development Review request to construct a 125,000 square foot office building with a two-to- five story parking garage at Lincoln Center. ZONE: C-P (Commercial • Professional) LOCATION: 10260 SW Greenburg Road ( WCTM 1S1 35AB, tax lot 1002) [ * Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other • 1 g information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by May 15, 1989. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. z_t_youars_a4aqtqa_:_t9_,_seapc2ncj_tjylie above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If, you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall. Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Deborah Stuart - 639-4171 PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY • We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please) contact of our office. } sky Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: f y a Name of Person Gok entingz ' i ._,rte.._..._....... Phone E'tintber bkm/SDR89-12.BKM I 4. i I s7r i. • Y 0 NOTIFICATION LIST FOR ALL A�1@PLICAT„IONS r ' . NPO No. (2 copies) CPO No. I-- 2. CITY. DEp 'tTMENTS Building Inspector/Brad R. Parks & Recreation Board/Curtis S. qty Recorder Police -�, Engineering/Gary A. Other �.; . 3. SPECIAL IS T RIGT S Fire District - School. Dist. No. 48 (Beaverton) (pick-up box bldg.) Joy ,Pahl � � Y PO Box 200 Gard W.D. Beaverton, OR 97075 >:� 8841'SW�; Commercial School Dist. No. 23J (Tigard) Tigard, OR. 97223 13137 SW Pacific Hwy. Tigard, OR 97223 Metzger W.D. ' 6501 SW Taylors Ferry Rd. ; , " • Tigard, OR 972231 Other 4. AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS Wash. Co. Land Use & TraosP Boundary Commission. Boundar 150 N. First Ave.� 320 SW Stark Room 530 }J llsboro, OR 97124 Hillsboro, OR 97124 rent Curtis • Kevin METRO Kevin Martiin � � � � Joann. Rice 2000 SW 1st Ave Portland, OR 97201-5398 h City v y' of Beaverton erton /a Jim Hertdryx , PO Box 4755 - 4755 SW Griffith. Beaverton, OR 97076 0 1 State Hightray Division Other I r Lee Gunderson PO Box 565 Beaverton, ,OR 97075 7. SPECIAL AGENCIES General Telephone Ce e P one Po rtland G � l Electric Mike McSherry/Beav� rton Brian Moore 4155 SW Cedar Hills 'Blvd.' Portland. General Electric ' Bob Olsen 97005 14655 SW Old Scholls terry 12460 SW Main 9722,E Beaverton, OIL. 97007 Area Cot ,. _ � Narthwest ��'at�v:lv,�:�PP; pLS Metropolitan T�ri�' Aa�s. Te mun ica�t ons Ronald D, i Technology Center 220 NW Second Ave. 11115 NW 169th Place, S-6020 Portland . . , O i.� �972 09 � � � �� � � �'Beaverton, OR 97006-4886 ■ Pacific North-West Bell Other� er (0257P/0006P) (R-2/89) n � swi,�.�_rw s1,r .,., ,ro-.r �.3Y�to .i ..I .nx.r.w+w.•.:.i...�J.,'Y.4rM 'lw..-» .:li• a� . 5. STATE AGENCIES Aeronautics Div. (ODOT) DOGAMI Engineer Division of State Lands Board of Health Commerce Dept. •- N.H. Park Fish & Wildlife Parks & Recrea. Div. (ODOT) LCDC Subdivision Supervisor PUC I , Dept. of Energy Fire Marshall Dept. of Environ. Q•tality Other 6, FEDERAL AGENCIES Corps of Engineers Other Post Office . OTHER Southern Pacific , por Duane M. Forney,Transportation PLSPro Project Engineer 800 NW 6t Avenue, Room 324, Union Station Portland, OR 97209 02157P/0006P I I • I i �1L ,. .,x.•i.,..lu .. x.,.. .,.., ,. ,•.,.�.r• .•... ..•- �,..•... .x1.•,r.. �. +.s•, .n..l... �•.., ••• ,.,.•.- ....,r,�•. ...n,.. •..«...�«. .,w•.�.,.,. ,...r....M.. �,...I..... II C 4 I.Nub.41,40 i�lxil 141e tlu..44 pvuY/W 1MU{uiW xl• VIIFXf ,H�NNYT+n k��YW 144 'tf 4fs y ,1p'�4"(-i4."�{ 1,V,i r,,y.r %iAiX✓'.7.p�{ 1 �iF14� 'i' i'„ tl00w�MWN'f xr+W! N�fikhA dlM ifYliYuri p}p 4.4. M{+up 1q�M.;44, A y( r�{ p9 FFF ,u� �M�'4/ .act i•„r�`^RSM E,'Y'nWIN :YrWT'�:1t e4kA;i3[ q M/t Y7•kK�aYM114p�t7 411 . I. r . I (:.. I �I' CL A X, OF TIC TIC OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR .89--12/v 89-17/M 89-11 CROW. .I TRAMMEL w CO. APPLICATION: A request by Trammel Crow Company for Site, Development Review approval to construct a 120,750 square foot, seven-story office building and a two-story parking structure on a 4.84 acre site presently zoned C-P (Commercial Professional). Also requested is a Variance approval to the building height requirement in the C-P zone which is normally, 45 feet and approval of a Lot Line Adjustment to adjust two parcels measuring 30,056 and 110,642 square feet into two parcels of 23,868 and 116,830 square feet. This request also proposes to change the alignment of SW 93rd Avenue (SW Lincoln Street). Finally, the applicant has requested Variance approvals to reduce the parking space width from 9 to 8 feet wide and to allow up to 45 percent of all parking .spaces to be compact spaces. Location's 10200 SW Greenburg Road (WCTM 181 35AB I lots 1002, 1004, 900, 500, 501, 600, 700, 701, 702 and portions of lot 2800 and 2901). DECISIbM: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director's designee for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above requests subject to certain conditions. '" The findings and conclusions on which the decision was based are noted below. A. FINDING OF FACT 4 1. Background The subject properties were annexed to the City of, Tigard in late' April, 19870. Prior to the annexation, two land use applications (Comprehensive Plan ,amendment, Special urge Permit) were filed with . Washington Co unty. Also, it was agreed at that time between the City, and County that all applications in process at the County would ¢' occurred after aainex. ion. continue even if the final decision 0 xat' A Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change (Case No. 87-73-M) to 1 '' change use designation �m (Residential, 5 u nits/acre) and Institutional to 0-C (Office Commercial) on parcels located I c immediateeie nort h of Oak Street and west of Lincoln Street extension Was was approved by the Board of Com isi ioners on May 19, 1987. A Special Ui a permit for a parking lot (Case No. 87-122-8U) was granted by the County on May 13, 1981, for four residentially ;coned, parcels located at.. . the .... ._southwest s o. . t r s'et and 93rd Avenue. The re�idence onthedep ro a rtie» were ren owed and a parking area developed. The conditions o f approval imposed by the count ' ti. r Sai n i effect. since this property has been annexed and the e city no allow commercial parking lots r thie Portion of the Lincoln Center parking lot is a nonconforming use qq On May 18, 1187,' the Tigard City council a. r'oved the rezoning Pp the rez ning of the NOTICE Off' DECISION - TRAMMEL CgOW CO (sDR 09-12/ 89-ii/H 09-11) PAGE i I I h r • ry ........ •fin n......,IL�awA A.W_..«n..M.......r, a,.. .. .. .,, .... . _. ...- _...._._...an.............._..—..wav-..a..a..lt,.» ..m ....,i..-.., ,: : a ..,-.._+.Ju....».S.M_,...at-...a.a.v...»....a - 1. . • r 11 f , annexed area in Metzger from Washington County desir nations to City designations which most closely resemble the County zones. This ordinance (No. 87-22) became effective on June 18;, 1987. Subsequent reviews utilized the City Community Development Code rather than. the County regulations. • A Site Development Review (SDR 87-08 and V 87-07) was conducted by City staff in June, • 1987 for an approval to construct a 12-story office building. It was approved subject to 16 conditions. In June of 1988, the Hearings Officer for the City of Tigard approved a Conditional Use permit request to allow the construction of a rooftop heliport atop the newly constructed Lincoln Tower office building. This application was approved subject to 13 conditions. In March, 1989, the Director's designee approved with conditions a request for several lot line adjustments and a minor land partition creating a new parcel at the southwestern corner of the Lincoln Center t . property (M 89-06/MLP89-05). In. May, 1989, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend 've Plan Amendment and Zone Change 'request approval of a Comprehans�. 1 g � •8,- - (CPA 89-05/ZC 89-05) affecting the Lincoln Centrrr property (tax lot 900 and a portion of tax lot 1002) and six residential properties to City dtaonf forwarded with the the east. A recommendation to the Ci..t Council suggestion that a deed restriction be placed property to Q restrict the use on the residentially zoned land to a parking ja • facilities use. Also approved was an amendment to the Metzgere-Progreso • Community Plan to alloW for the re-alignment of SW 93rd Avenue. These K requests were approved by the City Council on May 15th and a final order is expected to be signed on June 12, 1989. In the applicant's submittal two separate site plans were provided so as to afford the applicant a timely submittal, in the case that the •': comprehensive .laamendment b �he Council 'staff was that site result of its passage y D Y and associated plans which correspond with the recent amendments. 2. Vicinity Information ■ Properties immediately to the west and South are also part of the In Center _ developed... C- Linda Complex slid, Properties' �simmed�.atelr�d he north P (Commercial Professional). •. y h are developed C-P and 12 Multi-famil... Residential,zoned and dt� C-P ,� : 1, 12 units Y per acre)o The Metzger s located immediate) to the east and is zoned. R-4.5 (Single Family Residential, 4.5 units per . e School i , ( 9 t... Plan designates the school property pe ... as Metzger-Progress Community g o... a SW 93aastitutio.. . a in una.nco�poi�ated County. and'° sit of Avenue ax . :Pro ert3.es north of irigtbnuCt Str nal p ea rd Aven Wash • NOTICE T -• l2A o ' U8CaS7DECISION MMEL mow CO (SDR 89-12/V 89-11/M 89-11) PAGE 2 , � }} • ..L. ,i4.«...,.. _4.,1_.,Lu,.'r..,,. ..rKw. - . ._ .•.,.1,4.e,w,...JV»1_l. x...a•t.�...J.:,. • ..V... _,,. .,:_r wa.,..... I1' •'Y t i i Y. 3. Site Informal-Ion on and Proposal ..r • The Lincoln Center property is presently developed with four office buildings with a gross floor area of approximately 530,000 square feet and two parking structures on a total of seven parcels. The office buildaig is proposed: to be constructer; on two tax lots: tax lot 900 lies at the northeastern corner of the property. Immediately north and west of it is tax lot 1002 which measures 2.91 acres and now contains the Lincoln Center III building The applicant proposes' to construct a 120 r 7 50 square foot, seven-story office building on tax. lot 1002, just north of the Lincoln Center. III building. A two-level parking structure is intended to be built on 1.37 acres of land immediately to the east of SW 93rd Avenue (SW Lincoln Street) which currently contains six 'single family residential homes. Approximately 520 parking spaces will be provided by the new parking structure; approximately another 224 will be available on the ground. Inad' addition,n the applicant scant �s requesting. pP qu sting a Variance approval to exceed 0 the maximum building height standard in the C-P zone of 45 feet. The new seven story building, if constructed, would be 92 feet 6 inches to the roof line. Another Variance proposal requests perLission to decrease the parking space width from 9 to 8 feet and to allow up to 45 percent of all parking spaces to be designated as compact spaces. Finally, the applicant ro proposes P a lot line. adjustment Lincoln Center P �Me'tzger School property just the between leleaf which is necessary V' �,i� nter: and the st south of �i� tap �� eery to accommodate the realignment of SW 3rd' • Avenue. Portions of tax lot 2800 and 2901 will be shifted to the west ideel. b 93rd Avenue. The two ed side of the proposed, realigned SW 93 c1 Av . affect Parcels, measuring 30,056 (school district) and 110,642 (Trammel Crow) square feet each are proposed to be adjusted to 23,868 (school district) and 116,830 (Trammel Crow) square feet. 4. Agency and WPG Comments • The Metzger Water District, Portland. General Electric, the State i:hehw and ,.... Consolidated Fir. reviewed Highway Division, and the Con Fire District have all review' proposal h ve no objections to it Lei g hbarhood Planning Organization #8 has reviewed th e proposal and comments that it has concerns as to flooding of homes due to concentrated (Storm water) drainage into Ar h erne� and Ash Brook. e • I g has reviewed the proposal and has the The city Building Division following comments: a: A condition of approv a should require re that n e construction be allowed to t ake pla ce between the hours of �- and 7:00 a.mo • NOTICE OF DECISION TRAMMEL C Co (SDR 89 I�t 89-• 1) PAGE .. . . (, - �V 8t�9-��."1;�' 1.� � GE ':3 , I I I I I • '• t..wr.cx...n.•.,,,.....«.._•.... ,_....,•...,..,.....a ..»,.. .,..,,.». _ . �. .„ ...., ., .ir.•_.,,...J•._.,.,,.,.s.-...,._..»...,,....a.,.. ,.n, Y ,w«...w.,-,.•. - - ..,.„ - ., •.,, .,.,. .-w.. . - ..n.,--._.. ,..t.1 b. It shoLlid be required that all construction materials be stored on-site. c. It should be required that off-street parking be provided for all. construction-related vehicles and trailers, y` d. Flagmen should be provided when construction vehicles are r, blocking public streets. The City Engineering Division has reviewed the proposal and has the • following comments: a. Access to the site will be from SW Locust Street, SW 93rd Avenue and SW Mapleleaf Drive. The submitted site plan for Lincoln Center V shows four accesses onto Locust Street, plus the 93rd Avenue intersection and the Mapleleaf Drive intersection to Locust Street. Two accesses are proposed onto the relocated. SW 93rd Avenue and one access is proposed onto the extended '„ Mapleleaf Drive. Locust Street is a major collector street and will be improved in 1989 as a result of previous developments and • the Tigard Major Street Bond Projects. Its intersection with SW Greenburg Road is currently unsignalized. The construction plans are currently being designed for the Locust Street improvements. The applicant should coordinate the design of the two projects so p t ., • that construction can occur without duplication of effort. The applicant proposes to vacate the existing right-of-way of SW 93rd Avenue between SW Locust and SW Mapleleaf Street and y' • relocate it to SW 92nd Avenue at Locust Street. ror• • SW 93rd Avenue is designated as a minor collector street from SW Oak Street to SW Locust Street. The realigned right-of-way should f; be provided by the applicant prior to the vacation of the existing right-of-way. SW 92nd Avenue at SW Locust Street has a SO foot wide right-of-way. Minor collector streets require a 60- foot wide right-of-way and, a 40 foot paved width plus sidewalks, streetlights, and associated underground utilities. Additional right-of-way will need to be dedicated along the SW existing 92nd Avenue to create the g hp 60 foot wide tight-of-way required ' fOr a minor collector street. • Since SW 93rd Avenue will only intersect ng.. L. ocust Street, at is • • our opinion that most of the traffic coaling to and fro m the site I r'• will utilize SW Locust Street and only a minor portion will • utilize the SW Mapleleaf Drive access off of SW G>Veeaa{ouzg Rba.d. s ' Half-street iniprovethente are typically requ. eed for developments • such as this on adjacent streets: Since Si a 93rd Avenue is , rents. unimproved and proposed to a minimum to r�Fide rfot currently nimproved p be real imp ovements should be constructed as p for two-way traffic. .Right-of-way does not currently.... exist for SW NOTICE OF DECISION - � l 1 CO (St a 12/V 89-17/4 89-71) PAGE � 1' 9 0 A • • A __+.-.H+..- 4,,,,,.. .- t .._... 1 n 1.Nk w. w4 . t i ....,._ -r a.,+.r. ,. i _...__ . .. ,.u. Wn..•..,_r,•r+......•w.w. . i,. .r.»...._,.T ......r. .n+-w... .r.x._rr. ...n x.n... .n..,«. -n n,n -...,, ..i �'4, 93rd Avenue from Oak Street north approximately 280 feet. This area is currently occupied by a private residence. ° The applicant has requested that he be able to form a Local, Improvement District to improve SW 93rd Avenue to full width from SW Oak to SW Locust Street. The district would include properties which would benefit from the SW 93rd Avenue link between SW Oak and SW Locust Streets. We are not opposed to this request provided the applicant is required to make the two-thirds improvements if the Local Improvement District could not be formed prior to occupancy of the building or prior to any • increase in traffic onto SW Oak Street, SW Locust Street or SW Greenburg Road from this' development. • b. The traffic study submitted estimates the vehicle trips generated by this site to be approximately 1622 trips per day. ,. • The study recommends the following: • 1. The existing signal at Greenburg and Mapleleaf remain as a four-phase operation and be reviewed for interconnection with the Highway 217 traffic signals to improve traffic circulation on Greenburg Road. Road , 2. SW 93rd Avenue should provide access to the site from the south. " , 3. The Locust/Greenburg intersection be restriped to provide a left-turn and right-turn lane for westbound Locust Street traffic. We are in agreement with the total trip generation of this site, but do not agree with the above recommendations or the distribution of vehicles onto SW Greenburg Road at SW Locust Street, SW Oak Street, and SW Mapleleaf Streets. The Division concludes that the Locust Street access to Greenburg Road will carry much more traffic than shown on the traffic study. The. . Center peak hours a total of 64 v • V will generate La the traffic stars shows the Lincoln g ate p m, pe vehicles at the SW Locust Street 1' intersection of SW Greenburg Road, 101 vehicles at the Mapleleaf intersection"of Greenburg Road, and 28 vehicles at the SW 93rd Avenue intersections with SW Oak Street. It is staff's opinion that this distribution should be approximately 160 vehicles at the SW Locust Street intersection of SW Greenburg Road, and approximately 30 vehicles at the t�eet ap ritrersecti.on wz]:Y not intersection be Greenberg Road. The SW Oak S r F d part of this development and therefore ecefore r3l] not provide access to the site. The traffic study Shows the total, traffic on Greenburg road in the P.M. peak hair to b vehicles thrvesue intersection and 2�1 vehicles at teMa p le�eafntesectioi NOTICE! OF LRdZSXON -= TRIAINEL Mail CO (S1)R 89-i2/V 89--17/X4 89--11) MCA 5 Mai • AI • •.:.1.1,-:..,«c{.....«.lr.wn.......•..d ,x.a_ ...., ..:.,.+n..r..uc.... v.,.{...,11.-.=...t,,....., ....R.._....._i,.4:.1,t.,..-. ..._.,..W.-r.i,. _ ...w•..w:_ , .,.., .-.«.,,.u.,,.....--..... x.a.r.,...>-.a..... ,...,., .,_.. .. , • A } Based on the site generated traffic distribution discussed, above, it appears that the intersection of Locust Street and. Greenburg Road meets the signal warrants #1, #2, and #11 as defined by the Manual of uniform Traffic Control Devices, therefore, requiring a signalized intersection, . q The installation of the signal at SW Locust Street will ' impact, r the traffic flow of SW Greenburg Road which is currently operating near capacity. We feel that additional evaluation should be performed on the impact of the signal on SW Greenburg Road and how this impact can be minimized. Improvements to SW increase its may to .nc � . - Greenburg Road ma eventually be required o ,�, re capacity. The accesses to SW Locust Street from the parking garage are 4. shown to be approximately 80 feet from centerline to centerline to SW '93rd v A Enue and 65 feet from centerline to centerline to. another access. SW 92nd 'Avenue, across Locust Street, is also approximately 50 feet from centerline to centerline to 93rd Avenue. We are concerned that traffic movements from these two driveways will create an unsafe situation for vehicles and pedestrians. The location of the proposed accesses should be P' evaluated to determine their best location along SW Locust Street , and along SW 93rd Avenue. d. The seven story office stricture will be constructed over, an existing parking lot, therefore the increase in storm:, drainage 1 for this area will be negligible'. The parking structure swill be I ' constructed, over an existing residential area, increasing'. the storm drainage runoff from this area. The storm water will drain ?' to the south and is is proposed to be collected in the realigned SW 93rd Avenue roadway,{ The impact of this increased'I storm drainage should be evaluated to insure that the increased storm drainage ', discharge will not adversely impact the properties downstream. n. The entire drainage basin for this storm water system should be a evaluated to insure that, with ultimate development, the proposed • future storm drainage system within SW 93rd Avenue will provide adequate storm drainage capacity. e. It appears that adequate sanitary sewer facilities exist to ' provide service to the seven story office structure. " Washington. County has reviewed the proposed development and submits l j ! the tallows:n g comments a All( affected intersections ersections operate at near, o r over capacity as .1 Shown belara. ,I Intersection LOS v _ ,C Reserve Capacity Greenburg/Locust V -9 1.. (Sblt 85--12 ' 89-171em 89. 1 • 00/1 • • . I II, s1 r Ix+X4...•Yl.rx.lt.tl nb ....4-r...- .rr....iw•..uL • F ,•.Ala...r yr I t4«« x•.w a. ..... _ _ -....+uc., Y , ul':.. 4 a ..n..rvw, a.,M....•r ...w P...1...,4,,..n..n.-.w.N..a.l .=.t.......... .. .- .. ....t........ .In..,.x ....r...A.. + O . Greenburg/S. 217 Ramp F 1.09' 1 Greenburg/N. 217 Ramp E 0.94 Greenburg/Mapleleaf E 0.94 Calculated stacking distances are just barely adequate or inadequate • compared to available distances as shown below: r Stacking Stacking • Distance Distance Intersection Movement Required Avlailable'r Greenburg/Mapleleaf NB LT 495 ft. SOO ft. Greenburg/Mapleleaf WB LT 428 ft. 150 ft. Greenburg/N. 217 Ramp SS T 489 ft. 500 ft. As; you can clearly see, operations at the S.W. Greenburg/Locust intersection are a serious safety concern. Level of service at this'I' location is "F" and signal warrant volumes are exceeded.; Mitigation measures must be developed to elevate the level-of-serviceI at this intersectgion to "D" as required by Washington County Resolution and Order No 83-219. Staff review suggests that signalization in conjunction with signal interconnection for progressed traffic flow along Greenburg Road should be .investigated. Several previous phases of Lincoln Center were reviewed and approved by Washington County. Through these reviews and also through the Metzger Circulation Study and recent Transportation Plan Update we have continued to review and observe the traffic circulation issues associated with Washington Square and Lincoln Center.. ; We are extremely concerned that continued large scale development at Lincoln Center will exacerbate an already difficult situation. Additionally, our concern regarding Lincoln Center Five and associated traffic impacts is heightened considerably by recent discussions of relocating Metzger School in order to facilitate continued l easterly expansion of Lincoln Center. by Trammel Crow. We strongly believe that an appropriate condition of approval would 1 require mitigation of traffic impacts. Obviously, full mitigation of the traffic impacts as a condition of approval will have a major economic impact on the development project. Non ethelesar it s I important � e po tensure that �.x i stin� standards for mobility, traffic c capacity, and traffic safety are maintained prior to sandtioning any ftirther development II I. . '.• Washington n_y stands r, ead to meet...with prI e yen t a tsve of the City of Tigard, Oregon Department of Transportation, trammel Crow and perhaps adjacent property ow is mitigation of . impacts prior to granting approval of Lincoln Five.* ;. I I NOTICE OF DJ..isi N =min, cztor 89-12M 89-11/411/ li/x ag--1l) PAGE 7 . _ . . , 1 I . 1, . . . ( ( Northwest Natural Gas Co. comments that a one-inch line on the west side of the (vacated portion) of SW 93rd Avenue shouldn"t affect the , • parking structure. . , No other comments were received. . . . . B. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION Site Development Review (SDR 89-12) , Section 18.120.180 of the Tigard Community Development Code contains standards whereby the Planning Director or designee can approve, approve . with modifications, or deny a Site Development Review request. . The proposed site plan meets Community Development Code standards for . building setbacks and allowed uses in the C-P zoning district, but a . discussion of access and egress, signage, landscaping, automobile and bicycle parking, and building height is warranted. a. Access and Egress ., . The small scale of the site plan makes the access in the parking ..' structure nearest the Locust street frontage appear to be only 22 . . , feet wide. Staff notes that section 18.108.080 of the Community . . Development Code requires a minimum pavement width of 24 feet for . , two-way vehicular access drives. This 24 foot width should be maintained throughout the proposed development. t . The driveway Siaacing and locations as submitted in revised civil drawings will need to be reviewed by the Engineering Division to r- .fe access and egress to the site. A request for sign review tinder the provisions of the City Sign Code , . ' has not been Made in conjunction with this development review 1 request. Staff notes that all new or prOposed signage to be erected , with this r any other phase of the Lincoln Center complex must be reviewed by the City prior to its erection. Any additional freestanding signage will require a public hearing review by the .. , i . Planning Commission because the site already exCeeds the maximum allowable nuMber of signs and possibly the maximum allowable area for freestanding Signs in the C-P zone as well. . , . c. Landscaping , . . . The landscaping plan submitted by the appliCant Shows generally where the landscaping ist to be installed but does not indicate exactly where , I specific types of vegetation are to go. The site plan also indicates that trees will be planted at two ends of proposed parking space rows. The Code does not Allow trees to be within two feet of any permanent . . NOTICE OF DECISION - TRAMBEL CROW (SDR 89-12/ 89-17/K 89-11) PAGE 8 1 . : i . , . . \\. 6 , 1 ... ' • • • 4 • • • A A , •• • • • ( hard pavement surface or walkway. It is not clear from the applicant's submission exactly what these boxes will look like or how they will be sited. All of these items can be addressed by requiring the applicant to submit a detailed landscaping plan. d. Automobile and Bicycle Parking It appears that the total number of parking spaces is sufficient for this project both during construction and once construction has been completed. A final parking space count should be verified with the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. s Again, due to the small scale of the site plan, parking space 0 dimensions were difficult to determine. The Code requires these dimensions to be 9 feet wide by 18 feet in length. A discussion of parking space width and number of compact spaces follows later in this report. Section 18.106.020(P) of the Code requires a minimum of one secure bicycle parking space for every 15 automobile spaces. This would mean at least 24 bicycle parking spaces need to be provided on a revised site plan, These spaces should be distributed throughout the project and a significant percentage iodated o the lower level of the parking • • on the The rack design should also be submitted for approval. e. Building Height The maximum building height allowed in the C-P zoning district is 45 feet. The applicant is requesting a Variance appi:oval so that the proposed Lincoln Center V building may rise 92 feet 6 inches feet to the roof line. An architectural design element or "appendage" will • rise another 14 feet in the center of the building facade but does not • count towards the overall building height. Building Height Variance (V 89=111 The provisions contained in Section 18.98.020(A) of the Code allow relief from the maximum building height requirements up to 75 feet provided all • , three exception criteria can be met. These criteria require that a maximum height of 75 feet may be allowed in a commercial zone whed i) the total building floor area does not exCeed 1.5 times the area of the site, 2) the setback equals at least one-half of the building height and 3) the structure does not abut a residential zone. The total building floor area will not exceed 1.5 times the area of the site. Since the building height Will exceed 75 feet and the setback will be At, lesS than 46 feet, a Variance approval is hecesZary to allow the proposed height of 92.5 feet. Section 18.134.050 of the Code contains criteria whereby the Director can approve, approVe with Modifications or deny a variance reqUest. They are NOTICE OF DECISION - TRAMMEL CROW do (spit 89-12/v 89-17/M 89-11) PAGE 9•• o 40. / , • (1) The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this code, be in conflict with the policies 'i the Comprehensive Plan, to any other applicable policies of of the Community Development code, to any other applicable . policies and standards, and to other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity. ) • ' 4 (2) There are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over, which the applicant has no control; and which are not , same zoning district; M' ., applicable to other properties in the sam g . • . (3) The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this Code and City standards will be maintained to the greatest extent possible, while permitting some economic use of, the land; (4) Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not f' • limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic land forms or parks , r, will not be adversely affected any more than would occur if ` ' � the development were located as s pe cified in t he Co de; and w. , • (5) The hardship is not self-imposed and the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. ' The primary purpose of the Code height and setback requirements is to ' ,n ' provide adequate light and space between buildings, particularly when f • different zoning districts are involved. Although the building height is ,; taller than what the Code allows, the proposed angled 23 foot setback of r the building (only the corner of the building faces SW Locust Street) . will result in a less imposing structure than with a 45 foot tall i ' W building with a 20 foot setback directly facing onto SW Locust Street' ' which would meet Code standards. Moreover_`, the building will be . separated froth adjacent residential properties to the north and ■ northeast by the 70 foot wide public right-of-way of SW Locust Street, I • outermost building The distance of approximately 93 feet from the ding' Surface to the nearest residential property line to the Lxorth is ti n .• . approximately equal to the height of the building. r Ac :, 1 sa the street froth the proposed site rte p po �to is one isolated, p pe Y h II • sN ed r'o rt: which is. zoned R-12, that is not under residential use, and which is coact to y surrounded by C-P zoned land. Two other residentiallyLzoned, P 1 e on other 3 e sort Avenue Q parcels lie first arse a is likely to be most 3nffect d by the wshad;o is Street. . h P y this new buid ld an g might cause; however,, i t should eventuallybe rezoned because of its isolation from other residentially zoned land and becatse t it for .. longer used f will + t , tia�.l off it �s no long o. residential ses Existing physical and d g d, will not be subs ected extent than if thegbuildin met current C •sta idardS fOr natural systems including substantially worse sate;., the g City to a wore � � building heights. NOTICE or DECISION -- TRAMMEL CAOW CO t SDR 89-12/V 89-17/M 89-11) PAGg 10 ft ..r.n r.rl.y.r.n.h •- l...r.r..rr.' 'r.++rrr..:,Jr .NHxJ-rl.r'r-n.{nn:r,u..N:F...s...ra..r..,:.•rrts,.a.. t_...:fa -,rimy a.d r.r. r 1,.... 4aa+.n! r r .._l.w. , ......._........-..rrr_..,-nn•..,..-......rr......1 r..L..., a..a.....4r...y.w.x{Nlw.a ._.........- .r._ ._ rr...., .r.-..r. __ ..-r..,.. ... r Y..,..{..J-. IL1G r 1 i r l Parking Space Width and Percent of Compact Spaces Variances The above criteria have also been adequately addressed by the applicant. . ,; The reduction in compact parking space width "'from 8.5 to 8 feet is I minimal. The Washington County standard is 7.5 feet 7 f t . and the present 9t y p , ' parking lots are developed with this standard. Staff also finds no conflict in r allowing_u o - $,. rcenpt of all.. parka ng- syaces toMaM die deiated 'as corn act_spaces,, so rlong as e .al...;nuatber_o spaces or each phase of Lincoln.1n, Center is..satisfied. I I I I Lot Line A s d-tu tment (M 89-11) • A lot line adjustment approval of the joint property line between tax r' lots 2800 and 2901 (total area = 30,056 square feet, owned by the School District) and tax lot 1004 (total area = 110,642 square feet, owned by Trammel Crow) will be necessary because of the realignment of SW 93rd Avenue. Tax lots 2800 and 290]. are located at the southeastern corner of the intersection of SW 92nd Avenue and SW Mapleleaf Street. Tax lot 1004 is at the southeastern corner of the Lincoln Center development. Section 18.162.060 of Tigard's Community Development Code contains the standards whereby the Director or his designee may approve, approve with , conditions, or deny a lot line adjustment request. These criteria are: 1. An additional lot is not created by the lot line adjustment and the existing parcel reduced in size by the adjustments is not reduced below the minimum lot size established by the is approved zoning for that district; 2. By reducing the lot size, the lot or structures) on the lot ' will not be in violation of the site development or zoning • distridt regulations for that district; in addition to the ,te i provisions C � e above criteria; the prova. ns of Code Section 18.162.040 shall also apply to lot line adjustments. This section requires that: a the proposal conforms with the City's comprehensive ry requirements and regulations; ' r a11. statutory and ordinance �•e �. facilities are available to b) adequate public facil' : va` t serve the proposal; r C. � I c) all proposed lots conform to the Size and dimensional reqUirements Of this title; and ) proposed iutprovr. city , d) all r ezrient>� meet ci.trr Y and applicable agency standards. I , NOT/CE OF DECISION --• TRAMMEL r CWJW CO (SDR 89--12/V g9--17/241 $9I, 11) PAGg 11 r , I r I I w ..r ,, ...r.r . r:,..:... r. .r.r..r. ,.... .... . , .. •r..•r,. r . r., r„ .... r.. . .... r ,., ,.r . .. .r.. , $k, h n•:.....+.(....dvv...v.'.+......r+. ..w.x..a:.x,..•.. ...-.' v' <..•..... N.+......,y...x u..i., ..v. .,v., -•........,..... ,r„ .-,...F.•....v.ru.-.r „v _ _ , • J No new lots will be created by this lot line adjustment The area remaining to the east of the realigned SW 93rd Avenue will be the remainder of tax lot 2901. The Trammel Crow property immediately to the. • west of the ea increase • realigned ned SW Avenue g 93rd�Av n � wily increase b 6,i.88 square feet� �� formerly in tax lot 2800 and tax lot 2901, and will include the vacated right-of-way of SW 93rd Avenue between SW Locust and SW Mapleleaf Stteets and tax lots' 1004 (southern end of parking lot), 900 and 1002 (Lincoln Center V building and parking structure). No lots affected by this proposal will be smaller than what is required in the C-P and R-4.5 zoning districts. Tax lot 2800 is considered ',a nonconforming lot in the R-04.5 zoning district because it is smaller than the minimum lot size requirement of 7,500 square feet. By including it with the properties immediately to the west, this nonconformity is eliminated. The reduced tax lot 2901 will still be well over the 6,000 square foot minimum lot size in the C-P zone. , • All structures affected by this lot line adjustment will retain ' adequate setback distance from property lines. All proposed lots, . therefore, will conform to, the size' and dimensional requirements of the , A Code. The lot line adjustment proposal conforms with the City's Comprehensive Plan and all statutory and ordinance requirementt and regulations. The K� proposal also conforms to the Metzger-Progress Community Plan which was ` recently amended to will realignment of SW 93rd Avenue.wended� to provide for the real i u The proposed ill satisfy City and other applicable agency t:, sitanda.rds,- the City will ensure that this . is the came by imposing , conditions of approval which avast be satisfied prior to recording the lot line adjustment with Washington County. • C. DECISION • The Planning Director's designee for the C g s esi City of Tigard hereby approves SDR 89-12 and V 89.17 and M 89-11 subject to the following conditions: PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY PORE THE APPEAL DEADLINE TO Lei PERMITS BEFORE (LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS) FOR CPA 5/ZC' 89-05 THIS { DR 89-12/V STREET RIGHT-OP-WAY VACATION FOROS� 89-11 y THE �'� ....... . 93 AD AVENUE (RE OL TION 89-40), THE APPLICANT S� ENTER .INTO SW lh' WHICH HOLDS THE CITY, HARMLESS IF ANY AP MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING . • F THESE THREE' DECISIONS RESULT IN ADDITIONAL DELAYS � COSTS OR TIME 8 `�,4�5`T � TIE PROJECT. THE FOLLOWING I SATISFIED PRIOR TO RECORDING LOT LIB ADJUSTMENT WASHINGTON COUNTY: .• � N TICE OF DECISION � TR L COW CO (SDR 89-1 2/V 80-11/01 89-11) PAGE 12 1. The applicant shall submit a map and new legal descriptions for all 4 parcels involved in this decision for City staff review and approval. STAFF CONTACT: Jon Feigion, Engineering Division (639-4171). 2. The Lot Line Adjustment shall not be recorded until the realignment of SW 93rd Avenue has been completed. The description for both adjusted properties shall coincide with the new street alignment. STAFF CONTACT: Jon Feigion, Engineering Division (639-4171). THE FOLLOWING CONDITICWS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR"TO THE ISSUANCE OF A ' • r FOUNDATION PERMIT FOR THE OFFICE BUILDING AND PARKING STRUCTURE: 3. Vacation of the existing right-of-way for SW 93rd Avenue and for SW Mapleleaf Street from 92nd Avenue to SW 93rd Avenue or a licensing agsLeeMent with the City shall be approved prior to issuance of a foundation permit for the parking,garage. STAFF CONTACT: Dandy Clarno, Engineering Division 639--417 4. The existing accesses to the parkin garage on to Locust Avenue shall be evaluated to determine the beat location to avoid conflicting turning movements and sight distances . The location of the accesses shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to a issuance R o .„,foundat'ion- permits.....M, S AI F CONTACT: Gary Alfeon, .. Engineering Division (639-4171). , 5y he applicant shall submit a revised site plan which provides for at least 24 bicycle parking spaces; the bike rack design shall`'.. also be submitted for approval; b) that all two-way access drives have a Minimum pavement width of at least 24 feet; c) all parking . spaces will havQ Minimum dimensions of ,8 feet wide by fifteen feet long; d) a final count of parking spaces including i) the total number of construction: ii parking the totaloruLien�oln-'I, TI ,, prior to III and IV e number of spades displaced by the new . office building; iii) the total number of compact and standard spaces proposed for Lincoln V; and iv) the total number of remaining spaces foot. Lincoln I, II, III and IV after the Lincoln -e and e) all Compact.. . be labeled aelopi�ent, Ls completed; �.t Only" painted on Center V development ) spaces shall as such with the words wCompa.� y p `. . of the spaces. STAFF CONTAC T:T: Deborah Stuart, Planning D ivisiOp ' (639-4171). UNLESS OM� NOTED, THE FOLLOWING CO NDIT,. dNS SHALL SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. 6. The applicant shall Satisfy the conditions of all previous applications,... . R 87-08 and V 87 07 related to traffic� and drainage improvements. STAFF CON T Alfe , . SD . -- C 21n .CONTACT: Gary on, Engineering Division, (639-4171) . NOTICE OF DECISION TRAMMEL CE C O 89-12/V 89-17/M 80-11) PAGE 13 1 , I.. ) 7. The applicant shall re-evaluate the Mapleleaf signal prior to r making the improvements required by the previous application (SDR 87-08), to ensure the improvements will accommodate the additional traffic from Lincoln Center V. STAFF CONTACT:. Gary Alfson. f, ; 8. The applicant shall provide for the dedication of additional u, , right-of-way according to the proposed realignment of SW 93rd Avenue to provide for a 60-foot wide right-of-way as required for minor collector streets prior to or in conjunction with the vacation of the existing right-of-way of SW 93rd Avenue. The right-of-way shall include the existing right-of-way for 92nd Avenue. Right-of-way shall also be dedicated for the Locust Street improvements. The dedication document(s) shall be on City forms I: and approved by the. Engineering Division. Dedication forms and • instructions are available from the Engineering staff. STAFF ry CONTACT: Jon Feigion, Engineering Division (639-4171). 9. Sufficient bonds to guarantee the construction of standard two third street improvements, including concrete sidewalk, driveway apron, curb, asphaltic concrete pavement, sanitary sewer, storm ' , drainage, streetlights, and underground utilities,r shall be re, approved for the 93rd Avenue frontage improvements as shown in the t, submitted plans. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to minor collector street standards. Two third street improvements shall consist of a minimum of half--stret improvements plus 10 r feet of additional pavement. The improvements shall be constructed from Locust Street to the point approximately 280 feet north of Oak Street at the end of the existing right-of-way of 93rd. STAFF CONTACT: Gary Alfson, Engineering Division (639-4171). 10. The applicant shall provide sufficient bonding to guarantee the construction of a signal at the intersection of Locust Street and • Or gR applicant radditional. traffic engineering and analysis to determine the ope ration of the signal ' including phasin , timing and inter-connection i on with other Greenburg Road signals and impacts to 5W Gr eerburg Road. STAFF CONTACT: Gary Alfson, Engineering Division (639-4171). 1.1 n Oonditi.onal numbered 9 and 1Ci shall be waived if a Lo Improvement prior Local p .,, ._ r to occupancy to improve SW 93rd Avenue, full w .. . t Distract is formed ra.o �-. , width from SW Oak to Locust Street to minor } collector standards and install a Signal at Locust Street and GreenbUrg Road designed d tc 1 imit the impact toa r raf f is on Greenburg Road. u p ont s o reenburg Road, if require c©rdig to the additionaltraffic engineering analva�s, Sh all also be inclu ded. STAFF CONTACT a Gary Alf son, Engineering Div'sion (639-4171) 12. The applicant shall obtain a facilit' rm" . p r of L �' tation of Was _rform arnd Use and .brans or a to ar �neira it Pram th angtan County pe . n, '."• �ark in the ri ht-o,f.-Wa: of Greenb r ' Roads This ill in ounty satisfactory re olution of the traff is 3asaes not ed ve Count. , on p a3 es 6 and 7 of this decisior : A coPl shall be r oi ded to the NOTICE OF DECISION -» TRAMME,L (Sb1 '89.12/V 89-17 ) P. „; • ........ ..,....«.....,.r.s...,w......,,,.,». .. ,...,...,......,.......w,._.«,.., a. _,................_.. .,,".._„a.....,. , .,nl-.:w...r...,.Arw..,..,« r Ft a l,.-4.u,..... .,.... ,. ., z..w u,J-i....n....hk,_....+rW w,..r... ., ._,..,... , tt ti i , City Engineering nganeering lDivisa.on prior,to issuance ®f a public improvement , r permit. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Division (639- 4171) 13. The 'a applicant shall 'demonstrate that the storm drainage runcaff can I PP g be discharged into the existing drainageway without significantly impacting properties downstream. improvements shall be extended to Locust Street to connect with the existing system. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Division (639-4171). 4 14. Sanitary sewer and storm, drainage details shall be provided as part of the public improvement plans. Calculations and a topographic map of the storm drainage basin and sanitary sewer ' service area shall be provided as a supplement, to the public improvement plans. Calculations shall be based on full development of the drainage basin. The location and capacity, of the existing proposed and future lines shall be addressed. STAFF h> Ct3tti1TACT. Greg Berry, Engineering Dl.visxori (639-4171). , 15. Seven (7)' sets of plan and profile public improvement construction . r plans and one l, itemized construction cost estimate, stag d by'a P ( , �, g detailing a Pe y Registered Professional Civil n ineer, detaili all proposed i public improvements shall lee submitted to the Engineering Division for approval. Two (2) sets of plan and profile plane shall be submitted for preliminary review prior to Submittal of final plans. STA:"F CONTACT: Gary Alfsonx Engineerinc Division (639-4171). I' 16. Conatructi on of proposed public improvements shall not commence ce until after the Engineering Division has approved public improvement plans. The section will require a 100% performance assurance or letter of commitment, a developer-engineer agreement, the payment of permit fee and a sign rt 1 n/etr �l ght fee. hlao, the execution of a opening permit or ,s construction compliance agreement shall occur prior to, or ' concurrently with the issuance of approved public improvement p lans. STAFF CONTACT:�TACT: �ohn Bagman, Engineering Division 639 4171). 17. An agreement.. _. . . .., d by the applicant, on fcmfl prow • City, provided by the City, which waives the property owners right to shall be executed owner's )trier formed oppose or rate against a future focal S�nprovem � re,,�ang� ent D 3 to' ; complete 93rd Avenue e„ between bo ocu. st and Oak Streets. S TAFF CONTACT: Jon Feigion, Engineering Division (6394171) 18. Street centerline monumentation sh all be provid ed ad fO l" lows: a) Centerline Honume,ntation. • � A ' 1) ai accordance With Oregon Revised Statutes 92.060, �1 subsection (2)0 the centerlines of all street)� the denier et and roadWay rights-of-way shall be monument• e. d before ithe C ity accepts a s,tree t improVement. ,. I i r NOTICE OF DECISION TRAMOEL CROW CO (SDR 89 • ) o . . 2) The following centerline monuments shall be set: A) All centerline-centerline intersection points. B) All cul-de-sac center points. C) Curve points, beginning and ending points (P.C.'s and P.T.'a).. • b) Monument Boxes Required {^' ' 1) Monument boxes conforming to City standards will be I: required around all centerline intersection points and cul-de- sac center points. 2) The tops of all monument boxes will be set to finished . pavement grade. STAFF CONTACT: Jon Feigion,; Engineering Division (639-4171). 19. The applicant shall complete any half-street improvements to Locust Street not improved by the Major Streets Bond Project or revified by the site improvements. STAFF CONTACT: Gary Alfson, Engineering Divison (639-4171). 20. The applicant shall submit a revised, detailed landscaping plan which indicates: a) the exact location of specific landscaping materials; b) the design profile of the landscaping planters proposed to go in the parking lot area; and c) an irrigation plan. DURING ,CONfST.RUCTION OF THE OFFICE BUILIDING, PARKING FACILITY,, AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: }. 21. No construction shall be allowed to take place between the hours of 9:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. 22. All construction materials ahail be stored on-site. 23. The applicant shall ensure that off-street parking be provided for all construction-related vehicles and trailers. 24. The applicant shall ensure that flagmen be provided when construction vehicles are blocking public streets. 25. During Construction o. f a site am rovements the "con s t ructi on traffic skull access the area from Gree nb ur g Roo d only. All vehicles and construction-related equi pment ekiall be parked on the site. No vehicles shall be allowed to [�ark on S�» F oaks S� Locust 3rd Av'einiue which are related' to the cone truction 1.Of �tireet�l or Ski 9 the subject improvementsincluding emp to e e_s-, s nbcontr. actOrar material deliverien e tc: NOTICE or DECISION - TRA SDR 89 11 P it Ike 0 y '� ,. . ,+.,. +,..• .«,... ., .._. .....w .-.. ,.,.......,.....e.rr.,.a.u..«rv.._n.xr.v:+. %..wx..,...,...-✓.r u.—_...+..,+.,.w....,.......:JJ...,l,...w..a,.. rr..c_., r. ..r,...,wx....w,,,.-..,a..wu s,.n.4....,..,,...a.,.....rlfuka il.:,I,'.C.i,u.......4nu..a,..wu... ♦,. 26. All landscaping materials and other proposed site improvements be installed or financially assured prior to occupancy of any GT structures. STAFF CONTACT: Deborah Stuart,. Planning Division (639 •4x613. 27. A City sign permit shall be obtained prior to the erection of any identification wall or freestanding signs. Sign location and size must be in compliance . with Chapter 13.114 of the Community 1, m Development Code. STAFF CONTACT: Deborah Stuart, Planning D ivis ion I (639-4161). I I ' I THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS OF THE I FINAL DECISION D NOTED BELOW. I' D. PROCEDURE q' I 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: XX The applicant and owners 1 XXOwners of record within the required distance XXThe affected Neighborhood Planning Organization 7X Affected government agencies ,{' 2. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON 6/16/89. to UNLESS AN APPEAL IS .FILED 3. al: Any party. to the decision may appeal this decision in the accordance iws. 'h 32 290(A) and Section 18 ordanc it Section �1.d1, .�. .32 37D of n y Development Code Which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. Appeal fee schedule and forms are available at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon. I I I The deadline for filing of an appeal ia 3:�?�D pQ�►. .S ]G6�Sa. . I I i • i 4 Ou estion a. I f you have queations, please call City of Tigar d . Planning Department, City of �i g and I City Hall, 23125 SW'Ralf. Blvd., Tigard, Oregon. PRE .0 ,Y: r.i:bo h Stuart,' Asst. Planner DATE APPROVED BY: Kest°h, Sa /Alden, Senior Planner DATE SDR89-12.ds I I I NOTICE OF DECISION - TRAMMEL CROW CO SDI 89-12/V 89-17/M 8911 PSG II I I I » I I I I . yitd xY � • • • „,M Core ..e..; • CITY OF TIGARD RD NOTICE OF DECISION ,*. � 7�, SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 07-08 VARIANCE V 87--07 TRAMMELL CROW CO APPLICATION: Request by Trammell Crow Company For a Site Development Review .. to allow the construction of a 13 story, building of approximately ' 200,000 square feet as the fourth phase of the Lincoln Center office complex and a Variance to allow a building 176 feet in height where 45 feet is the maximum . allowable, and a decrease in the width of compact parking spaces from 8.5 feet to 8 feels on property zoned with Washington County districts b-C (Office , Commercial.);"""R�=S (R "'sidential, 5 units per acre) and R-9 (Residential; 9 units 1 per acre). Location: e of SW Street, erg �, �. rt; easi. 'of SW Greenburg Road, south ' l Locust west and south of SW Lincoln Street and north of 'SW Oak' Street (WCTM '131 35AB lots 800,. 801, 900, 901, 1004, 1005, port of. 3300, 3301, 3400, 3402, 3404, 3500, 3600.) DECISION:CISION: l otice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard his APPROVED the above application subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the Director based his decision are as noted . below. • A. FINDING OF FACT v 1. Background The subject property was annexed to the City of Tigard in late' April, 1987. Prior to the annexation, two latid use applications (Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Special Use Permit) were filed with Washington County. Also, it was agreed between the City and County that all applications in process at the County would continue even if . ,,, the final decision occurred after- annexation, The Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change (Case No, 87-73--M) to change the use designation from R-5 (Residential, 5 units/ac re and Institutional to 0-C (Office. Commercial) on parcels located immediately north of oak Street and west of the Lincoln Street extension, This was approved by the Board of Commissioners on • May 19, 1937. A Special Use Permit for a parking (Case No, 87-122- ) p � lot ( SU W s by County y residentially zoned granted �' y print !.. ed (s the Cour'tit on May 13; 1987 for four . ocust '' Street and parcels located at the southwest corner, of es on properties will be 1'removed and a 93rd Avenue. The resxder�c these er"t' parking area will be developed conjunction proposed in this application. The �n' citions lof approval. l;he pi~d+ byt p 1"he cohd imposed the County shall remain in effectp, Oh n M. a y 1.087,, the he Tigard City oun c�i approved the rezoning. of the a nnec ed area i n M etzg er from Washington County designations to City designations which most closely 1 resemble the County l zones, This NOTICE oF DECTSZd?N 87-o5/V 87-07 TRAMMELL CROW CO, PAGE 1 II 1 I I I • ...,,».,1,.,..w..,.-,.»...._.,,..za.•....,w .M..,,, ...w...t.-„ .w.,. 4.•...-.....,_.v, i„ .-,.r _-'__ ,.,.._n,.... u..,.,.,...-..«.+,a., ._..,o..,.. .k..N«_4. 1•x4, .....,a.. w,. 4.,...,... <,•w.n w_. ,w... ,. 4 • MA ordinance (No. 87-22) will become effective on June 18, 1987. The following review utilizes the City Community development Code rather than County regulations, r' 2. Vicinity �Information �• Residential properties lie to the east of 93rd . Avenue and to the northeast, The Metzger School property is zoned Institutional in the County and will be zoned R-4.5 (Residential, 4.'6 units/acre) in the • City. Properties to the north, went, and south are zoned Office Commercial and will be C--p (Commercial Professional) in the City, • Primary access for the project is directed to Greenburg Road to the I west and Locust Street, Oak , street and 43rd Avenue border the • remainder^ of the property. • , 3, Site Information and Proposal Description The property is presently developed with three office buildings with a • gross floor area of approximately 300,000 square ,feet, parking areas,' and landscaping. The applicant ha s recently purchased the three Parcels" that were subject of the Zone Change (87.73-M) as well as the fours parcels involved in the Special Use Permit (87-422-SU). These properties will be incorporated as part of this project. , The applicant proposes to construct a fourth office building that will y . have �a maximum of 13 floors, a height of 176 feet, and a gross floor area of approximately 200,000 square feet, Within this area about ti • t,000 square feet of service retail space will be provided on the first floor.floor. The building will be located between the two existing office buildings known as Lincoln Center I and II with a' setback of a approximately 220 feet from the eastern property line, ' Additional parking area will be provided on the site and a second parking • structure will be built immediately south of the new building ' Access is proposed to be directed primarily to Greenburg Road with • secondary access to Locust and Oak Streets. The entrance to Greenburg ' • Road and the traffic signal will be modified to accommodate the additional traffic,traffic, The Metzger-Progress Community Plan identifies • Greenburg,Load as a minor arterial street and Locust, 93rd, and Oak as local streets, Variances are requested to exceed the maximum allowable height in the C-P 8fe t in W3.d�Ch5r�a'r;her than the allow king spaces t are/7t, •.� tha q r' 4 Agency and NPO Comments g has the follo wing The �n ineering bivi.sxoh wing corrrments: t , a1 SW Creenburg Road, SW Locust Street, and SW Oak Street are currently under Washington County jurisdiction, SW Lincoln street is under the jurisdiction of the City of Tigard The City and k. ' County are currently working to transfer the jurisdiction of , • NOTICE OF DECISION SOR S7-08/ ' � V. 87-07 TRAtwLL CkOW CO, PAGE 2 0 • .. ..t,.un....«...-arr-.•....r_w. .1.. ..Y+ail..w:_.l:n«.ri...i.•.'h..'+J ,,,_, ., .r..._ca«t.a,. .._N..r._..............f.o-.1. ar..,......+..4r µ ' ,'•'•'. .' „ ,. ......s..--nN rs..ik:.4w.+4...•.+Ih9.nrHn4w:Wnaxln-..rr.i{LMtA..t<..-.. ,r. The primary intent of the Code height and setback requirements is to provide adequate light and space between buildings, particularly when g . p y. different zoning districts are involved. Though the building is taller than allowed, the proposed setback will result in a less imposing building than. a 45 foot tall structure with a 20 foot setback which would meet Code standards. No adverse impacts . mpacts resulting from the varxance, are anticipated relating. to traffic impact. The building square footage is within Code requirements and the traffic generation will not exceed what would be exp. from full of this site. noted expected f 1.�, � �.s' � As _ � in the Engineering Division comments, several traffic related issues will need to be finalized prior to completion of this project. Parking Space Dimensions The above criteria have a also been en ad e q uatel J addressed by the • applicant. The reduction in compact space width from 8.5 to 8 feet is minimal. The Washington • County ' standard is � 7.5 feet and the present . . parking. r.. lot is developed ed with thi s standard. C. DECISION . ga rid upon the discussion above, the Planning Director approves SOR 87-08/V 87-07 subject to the following conditions: 1. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF SITE WORK OR FOUNDATION PERMITS, TIME FOLLOWING ON C . NS SHALL DZ1"IO L GE SATISFIED: . . ,. The applicant shall demonstrate that the existing on—site and off site storm drainage system is sized to carry the storm run--off from a 10—year storm following, full development and that the additional run—off caused by their development will cause no significant impacts on downstream properties b. The applicant 'must submit a revised site plan demonstrating that future relocation of the SW Locust Street and SW Oak Street accesses to SW Lincoln does not significantly; impact the site. The revised site plan must be approved by the Planning and Engineering Sections, 2. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF G CONSTRUCTION PERMITS, TIC CONDCTIONS MUST BE COMPLETED OR ASSURED. ALL CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS NOTED BELOW MUST DE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE or OCCUPANCY PERMITS ,� that the on—site Private a. The applicant shall demonstrate � p� ' te storm drainage system will be operated and maintained by an enforceable, maintenance agreement affecting benefiting properties, be Standard half--street: improvements including sidewalks, curbs streetlights, driveway aprons, storm drainage and utilities shall be + a along Oak ge. Said improvements s ��ahon• installed alQn the SW Street frontage. �' p�w along SW oak Street shall . be built to City minor collector NOTICE OF D,GCxSIq N S �7--CS�� R7�7 = TRAM1�L L. CROW CO. — PACE 6 • standards and, conform to the alignment of existing adjacent improvements. the City will be issuing the necessary public improvement permits for this requirement. c. Standard half-street improvements including sidewalks, curbs, streetlights, driveway aprons, storm drainage, and utilities shall be installed along ...the e SW Locust Street fronts e. Said • improvements shall be constructed to City major collector , standards and conform, to the alignment of existing adjacent improvements. The City will be issuing the necessary permits for ,. these improvements. M d. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the pubic along the ' • SW Oak Street frontage to increase the right--of-way. to 30 feet from centerline. the description for said, dedication shall be centerline as established b , t' right-of-way Y. tied to the existing Washington County. The dedication document shall be on City forms . and approved by the Engineering Section Contact Jon Feigion in, Engineering for forms and further ;information, e. Additional right--of--way shall be dedicated to the public along the entire SW Lincoln Street frontage to increase the right-of-way to 30 feet from centerline. The description for said dedication'' shall be tied to the existing right-of�-way centerline 1n addition, the applicant shall dedicate t o the p ublic a 60 foot of ' ;* wide strip, in direct alignment and extension of SW Lincoln Street across the entire north-south distance of tax lot 3300, map 181 35A8. The dedication shall be on City forms and approved by the Engineering Section. Contact Jon Feigion to, obtain forms and further information f. The applicant shall provide at least three westbound .approach lanes on Mapleleaf at Greenbu rg Road applicant shall ll construct mod if ications to the existing intersection a nd traffic signal installation Was required to accommodate the widened Mapleleaf approach a1, Greenburg Road. Said improvements will • require the submittal of detailed construction drawings to the City and County for approval, ro g. The applicant shall sign a waiver of remonstrance agreement to , participate in a potential future local improvement district for , the improvement of SW_Lincoln Street. Included 'in the agreement will be the applicants-assurance to relocate the SW Locust Street. . and SW Oak Street accesses to SW Lincoln street. Said agreement , •' will be prepared by the City anti recorded with Washington County once executed. ., improvements..rovements shall not co ence h: Construction of proposed public atip ' , � .�o ed mublic Cons • until after the Engineering Section has issued approved p, improvement plans. 4The applicant must post a �0 percent • performance assurance, the payment of a permit, a g installation/streetlight fee. Also, t he execution of a street opening permit or construction compliance agreement snail occur prior to, or concurrently' with the issuance of approved public • improvement plans. NOTIcE OF bEci8tON 1)R 87-00/V• 81-07 - TRAWELL CROW C0 • A L 0 • ,,....«G,. o- M.,. _t 7 , '� h..1�- ,...,.y ., . _ .. .,w....nh.�.I.v.,»h ,.,.{-alwk•iM k.,w.. e—- ,,. x. Upon completion of cursory review, seven (7) sets of plan—profile public improvement construction plans and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a Registered Professional is Civil Engineer, detailing all proposed public improvements shall be submitted to the Engineering Section for approval. Submit • •. improvement r drawings and related data to John Hagman in Engineering. ° 3. PRIOR •1O ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL �. BE SATISFIED: a. The applicant shall provide confirmation of the total gross floor area of the entire Lincoln Center complex. b, A revised site plan . shall be submitted for Planning Director approval which contains the following: (1) (Parking space dimensions (standard 9' x 18' ; compact 8" x 15"). (2) One handicapped space per 50 required spaces (12' x 10') ( ) 38 secure bicycle spaces distributed bUted thr°oughout the Lincoln , • Center complex '(bike rack design must also be submitted for approval). c. A detailed landscaping plan shall . be submitted for Planning Director approval which cont-Ai,ns the fallowing: (1) Identification of all plant materials. • (2) Scree of parking areas. (3) Justification t i "ic at10 n for removal al of existing trees along g the east e rnl boundary of the project. (4) Compliance with Chapter 18.100 and Section' 18,120.100(a)(4) of the Community Development Code. 4. Landscaping materials shown on the approved plan : Condition s.c.) shall be installed prior to occupancy. 5, The conditions of approval for Special Use Permit (87•,..122-5U) and _� e ) l be P Amendment Change' (g 7,__ . Comprehensive Plan Am � ,4 meat Arad 2ahe. Chang, 73—Nt shall i 6 a:.. is valid if exercised within y ar of final s approval ' `� , xrti� �r�rte e �the 1~ l decision date noted below, 9 II y y f • S�ICI�'xCE OF DECISION . . SD1� 87-00/V a b7 07 — fRAMMELL CROW CO, — PAGE 1). ., .....;.i,, ,.--+,..,..,..,..,,.w,..�,.,. _..,.._« _................_w......_. ..«„....»...,.... ,.a..,.-.,. ,..-,_.r. ... ..»_.. .......,......u.._.,...»..._.:..,._,,..•.w._.............u.. ...a:_.„.•._ -- .., ,,,.,-, ,...........au..:.u.........a,.,, ... .....,.,w .-, . ( 1 (, ,1 • D. PROCEDURE 1. 'I Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall . and mailed to+ XK Th e applicant & owners �a XX_ Owners of record within the' required distance XX „, The, affected Neighborhood Planning Organization XX Affected governmental rnmen tal agen cies �„� ..�.._. 0 2. Final D�ci sion. tHE DECISION BE FTNAL at. June 22, 1987,UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED: I 3 A kp eat . An y party to the decision may appeal eal this decision in accordance. with Section 19.32;.29O(A) and Section 19..32,,37© of the , :, ' Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must - be file d with the CITY RECORDER within 10 day s after notice is given and sent: The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 P.M. June 22, 1987. • • 4. Questions: If you have any questxons, please call Cit y of Tigard, Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , PO Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223, 639-4171. ' PREPARED BY: Keith S. Liden, Senior Planner DATE I k e” l William A: Monahan, Director of Community Development DATE APPROVED (kL:cn/3277P) .. aUeidd�5 yy : ,li;io,o4;;e;'''* \------ \ ■',N, F----'77 1 ; I '1.- _, . _i---0.--1 IIIII Ifiri ' ill 1 rr , ' _ t T � pil . r,..: , ... , 8 s,,,,,,.4,4s,;1 r----- .4 IN , \ y' / ____../ 1 „ i \15 \ \-\\\,,,„__ L I N —1-1"---) - \v. j DECISION - SD .W. �uC�TICE OF .,, �d ' B7';08�`� B��C7 TaAELL CROW CO: — PACE E•41,d0.-k A •. ( s, C4-4) CITY OF TIGARD 4 NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 90-0022 VARIANCE VAR 90-0033 LINCOLN VIII PARTNERS APPLICATION: (1) A Site Development Review request by Lincoln VIII Partners to allow construction of an approximately 140,000 square foot, seven-story office building and a three-level parking structure; (2) a Variance to the 45 foot height limit for buildings in the C-P zone is requested to allow the proposed office building to be 92 feet tall; and (3) Variances are also considered to • reduce the required compact parking space width from 8.5 feet to 8 feet and to allow up to 35 percent of the required parking spaces to be provided to be compact spaces wheread the Community Development Code allows a maximum of 25. percent of required spaces to be compact spaces. ZONING: C-P (Commercial Professional). LOCATION: Southeast corner of SW Greenburg Road and SW Locust . Street (WCTM 1S1 35AB, Tax Lot 100) , DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director's designee for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above described requests Subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted below: A. FINDINGS OF FACT 10 Background The subject property was annexed to the City of Tigard in April, 1987. in May, 1987 the Tigard City Council approved rezoning of the annexed area from Washington County's 0-C (Office Commercial) toning designation to the City's C-P (Commercial Professional) zone. The subject parcel was already developed with the Lincoln Savings building and a surface parking lot. The subject parcel is located in the northwest corner of what is known as the Lincoln Center. The City haS reviewed numerous other land use and development applications for the Lincoln Center development, but none that have dealt directly with the subject parcel except for a recent Minor Land Partition application, MLP 50-0022, which approved dividing the subject parcel, tax lot 1000, into three parcels Containing 44,856, 67,283, and 74,159 square feet. That application was approved on November 2, 1990. This partition has yet to be recorded. A Site Development Review applidation was approved for condtruction • ...of the 12-story LinColn Tower office building in June, 1987 (SDR 87- • 08/V 87-07) in the southeastern corner of the Ltncoln Center'. The approval included a variance to the maximum building height standard for the zone. In June, 1988, the city of Tigard HearingS Officer • approved a Conditional Use permit requeSt to allow the Construction . of a rooftop heliport on top Of the Lincoln Tower office building. • NOTICE OF DECISION-SDR 90-0022/VAR 90-0033 LINCOLN VIII Page 1 ' • _.tea... __ _..... -e,' ', ... .r.r iii_i A .-L.- -- „__. .»..+ .. .. ...x,..___._ i ,. -,.,r.. _r_.,_, .• r w,.... .,.r,M.,. ..rx,.rl»u.r...s:'a_.. .z r a • r V' In May, 1989, the City Council approved a Comprehensive Plan ' Amendment and Zone Change request (CPA 89-05/ZC 89•-05) rezoning the 4. site of the parking garage that was constructed along with the Lincoln V office building. The parking garage and Lincoln V are ' located in the northeastern corner of the Lincoln Centor complex. Construction of Lincoln V and the parking structure was approved through Site Development. Review SDR 89-12 and Variance V 89-17 in June, 1989 That approval allowed construction of a 121,000 square foot, 7-story office building and a 2-story parking structure. Also approved were a variance to the 45 foot maximum building height requirement in the C-P zone and variances to reduce the parking space width requirement from the standard 9 feet to 8 feet and to allow 45 percent of all parking spaces to be designated as compact spaces rather than the permitted maximum 25 percent compact space allowance: The subject parcel, along with the remainder of the Lincoln Center development, was included within the boundaries of a proposed urban renewal district through an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan policy document (CPA 90-0001) and development of an urban renewal plan known as the President's Parkway plan. The Comprehensive Plan amendment and urban renewal plan were approved by the City Council in March, 1990. In May, 1990, the tax increment finance method of funding public improvements associated with the urban renewal plan was rejected by Tigard voters. In response to this action, the City ? Council on September 10, 1990 approved CPA 90-0006 reversing the ` earlier amendments to the Plan Policy Document. In addition, the Council repealed the 'President's Parkway urban renewal plan. 2. Vicinity Information Properties to the north, east and south of the subject parcel are ` also zoned C-P. Properties to the east and south are also part of the Lincoln Center complex. Lincoln Center contains a number of office and restaurant bUildings. Property to the north across Locust -- Street has recently 'received Site Development Review approval for Greenbur construction Road are zoned C-G •are developed to Washington truction of Propextie o the west across g ped With the, gt Square shopping center. 3. Site Information and Proposal Description - Tax lot 1000 is one of seven pat dela that make up the Lincoln Center � • development... The subject c t par cal co a n s the two story Lincoln Saving s buildin g, surf ac e parking for approximately 150 cars, an d portions of main roadways in,t o the e de ve l opMe.n,t. Lincoln Center is presently developed with six office buildings an d two multi-level %p reen structures. The'Lindeln Center development also contains a of the Lincoln Center om complex is 22 1e acres. s The 1 roes number of surface parking.,. lots and y tout P g ss leasable s qu are footage of the six existing office buildings is 710,377 eqUare feet: The existing parking lots provide parking for 2,490 automobiles. NOTICE OF DECISION-SDR 90-0022/VAR 90-•0033 LINCOLN i ' III Page 1.• 2 '' n• 'o: 6 t L C ''' The earlier. Minor Land Partition approval (MLP 90-0022) affecting the • subject parcel approved division of the Tax Lot 1000 into three parcels containing 44,856 square feet (Pn;,lel'1); 67,283 square'feet ( (Parcel 2); and 74,159 square feet (Parcel 3). The proposed boundary between Parcel ] and Parcel 3 would cut through the `single story western wing of the Lincoln Savings Building. Parcel 1' would also '" contain a small parking area. The existing parking lot on Locust Street is totally included within Parcel 2. This partition application was approved subject to certain conditions including the . y • creation of reciprocal access and parking easements amongst these i, parcels and a declaration by the property owners that.would'indemnify . the City against legal actions arising from the proposed property1• line between parcels 1. and 3 cutting through the single stony wing of the Lincoln Savings Building, The current Site Development Review application proposes construction of an approximately 140,000 square foot, seven-story, 92 foot tall • office building on proposed Parcel 1 to be created from the prior partition application. The single story western wing of the Lincoln • Savings Building would be demolish& and the two buildings would 'le connected. The Lincoln Savings building would include 57,350 s ; ' .e feet after the modification. The proposed new building's. main entrance would be oriented to the northeast facing a proposed parking structure to be built on Parcel 2. The application includes a Variance request to allow the proposed new office building to be 92 feet tall whereas the Community Development Code allows a maximum building height of 45 feet (Code Section 18.64.050.A.4) t The proposed three-level parking structure, including parking for 614 cars would front on Locust Street. One level of the etruct i e would be below grade. The proposed parking structure would replace a 171 . ' t parking space surface lot resulting in a net increase of 443 parking ! stalls. The parking structure is to have e °n'e entrance directly £ro3 ti� and entrances off a£ the priv ate access r ad o ff , of LocustStr�tThe application also request variance to allow._ • - a reduct ion in trig Code's Compact parkin g space width requiremen from 8.5 feet (Code Section 18.106.020.A) to permit 8 foot wide sp aces. parking d spaces aces to be designated aced' as compact spaces 35 percent . considered to tted maximum 25 percent� pact P �rat�ier� than ' � � � � .10 6.o � space _.allowance (Code , ' ' the com s ace �allc►w' Section 18 O 40.A..1). The applicant's r' s ......submittal. the office.. � in 9 e s design is intended to h armonize with the building styles and co or s the g surrounding Lincoln Center building s. Likewise, the proposed parking ,.arage is to be e and brick struCture similar to the . `-existing parking adjacent to the Lincoln developer states that construction of th and Lincoln p 9 March, 1 wit rrs proposed 14 ated to begin in PZa� buildings. The dev,elo completion expected' by November 1951. h Mid-rise building is anticipated NOTICE OF DgCIStoN-SDR 90-0022/VAR 90-0033 LINCOLN V111 page, 3 tdP ` ` 1 . , ! • i Mapleleaf Drive/SW Greenburg Road intersection and the additional left turn storage on SW Locust Street as requested by Washington County in order to mitigate the impacts of the • projected i►.tcrease in vehicular traffic resulting from this } development. The.Traffic Impact Fees generated by the proposed development will aid in financing a study of traffic needs and in constructing further improvements, d. No additional bus turnouts or shelters have been recommended by the agencies reviewing the development's potential traffic impacts. Nevertheless, the City urges, the owners and tenamss of the Lincoln Center development to work with Tri-Met to improve transit usage re'l„ated to the development. Possible improvements could include having buses enter the development''s roadways in order to improve accessibility to the transit system, a bus shelter, employer subsidized bus passes, sale ' of bus passes, and improved information on bus service available on the site. e. Parking spaces for disabled persons will need to be provided as required by City and State standards. Prior to building permit issuance, a final plan for the proposed parking structure shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval that shows locations and dimensions of all designated 1 handicapped, parking spaces. Handicapped spaces should be located convenient to entrances to the building. f. The property is not affected by the adopted bicycle/pedestrian plan for the City. 20. Policy 8.2.2 is satisfied because the proposed development would be su ppo rtive of City policies to encourage the expansion and use to public tr ansit b y locating intensive uses in close proximity to existing transit ways, and because as previously mentioned in this rev�apeus�rovid meat w report, the. City will require that the developer provide preferential parking for carpoo]. and vanpool users within the proposed parking structure. 21. Policies 9.1.1, and 9.1.3 require the City to encourage Ura g e...a re....d uct...ion in consumption by increased opportunities for energy conservation and through encouragement of dQ { ftS Which em p hasize such opportunities through design features. These policies are satisfied through the required modsf cat3ots to the site p lan intended to la ss trams$t usage,�e% pedestrian an. aa�kwa usage,e, and carpool Usage which will encourage energy conservation through sound development design and construction. D. DEdISOW The u ...comuu n it y... Development Director's designee.'.. hereby AP PRO GE S Site Development Re view a pp lLcati on SDR 90-0022 and Variance 90- NOTICE -0033 tI COteN VIII page' 22 ..... .. U22/VAR 9Q OF DECISION-�SD1R 90 i , • ' 1 . J • .,._,...-...—.....v. t......, .., .. .., ...,................ .• ..,.- v.._.,..._ e.. ..w,k.., •...•...s.,....._.....«.......M.w,.._.. ..•.«....,a.,._a.......,.w,.....,•...•..,.. ...a.......-......,.. - ....a. ,.,.mss-«.. .: _ .,- _. -. �,! (> •• I, 0033 which will allow the proposed. building to be no taller than 92 feet, om ct spaces,to allow up to 35 percent of all parking spaces to be c pa and to fallow compact parking spaces to be reduced in width to 8 feet. The s above described development approvals are subject to the following ' conditions: ' BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A SITE • TIEE. FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL 8 T ' WORK OR GRADING PERMIT. (Staff contact, Chris Davies, Engineering Department, 639-4171) 1. Sanitary sewer and storm drainage details and calculations shall bey provided as part of the site improvement plans. Calculations shall be based on full development of the serviceable area. The location . . . and capacity of existing, proposed, and future lines shall be I . ' ' addressed. Designs and calculations submitted shall be stamped, by a Registered Professional Engineer licensed to practice in the ;S' ate of Oregon. 2m An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the improvement .. drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Control Plans Technical Guidance. Handbook,, November 1989. . ' 3. Prior to any tree removal or grading, a detailed tree protection plan ' • shall be prepared by a qualified arborist. The tree protection plan shall be submitted for Planning Division approval. The plan must include locations and types of trees to be removed or retained, recommendations for methods of protecting retained trees during construction of the proposed buildings as well as for the long-term li , . health of these trees, and a commitment for continuing review of the construction activities and tree p rotectio. n measures by the arbo=i.st. ', The tree shall include at a minimum all trees designated retention on t protection plan sha • the preliminary landscaping plan and should ved shall be protected The sh ld endeavor to add additional. tie trees to be rya p during action. by fencing N. t and Planning " "radi*i � cleating or tree removal. �, ., or sa.rr<�. means approved by the aacborii,s Division. No °. site g g, g shall occur prior to satisfaction. � of this condition. STAFF CONTACT: +7erry, Offer, Planning , Division, (639-4171). THE FOLOWING CONDITIONS S HALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO T E ISSUANCE OF ,,...A t tiILDLVG PERMIT. (Unless noted otherwise, staff contact i s Chris Davies, 1`J Engineering � � g ineerin g De_partment, 639-4171): . 4. A rev' ► °e plan shall be which provides for the ' g changes: p . ' �. following reed e s ffiz a poi A. Sidewalk connections shall be 'oVided between the sou.thwester side Of the building and the ublic sidewalk on Gre nbur , • g p e. g Road, , between Green burg n de of the • " �g t main access road from Gree _ building, northeaste�ni Side .. , and along� the �za u�.ldan . . g the �. ... , near Road and t . . g x�.burg Road ; / . . to the exist.i:ng Walkway«, south cif ii,� . ' ,�� y the;�s.ncoln ,savings build g I NOTICE OF DE0I8i0N-snR 90-0022/vAR , 90-0033 LINCOLN Nf VIII Page 23 • • ' • • � ` 1 f . : k -• ' • i..-1-..,.a....... .. .r-. -. _ .... i_,......,........... ........ ...«.., ....i .i,w4..i......+.....-....t l'....»....1...«.K:A:.,.h« .n,w..N...«..a...,.,A....ua. . .. i.... ......-.......,-. - ., i....af.h-..w.-.w�r u....-..Wa., wt•f.....i�� IUJ IT . •, :VH }NFµ • t' �{ it By Removal or relocation and redesign of the driveway from the parking ramp directly to SW Locust Street. If the driveway is to be relocated, it must be redesigned to provide adequate vision clearance and it must be sufficiently removed from the Locust/Greenburg intersection so as to avoid traffic conflicts with vehicles on Locust Street. STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Offer, Planning Division, (639-4171) detailed plan of the parking structure shall be submitted which 5. A ]P g P provides for the following: A. Locations and dimensions of no less than 8 designated handicapped accessible parking spaces; B. Locations of no less than full size p pool use foot t�.o han 20 � fe by 18 foot) reserved and signed for car po ly. C. A warning bell, warning light, or other warning device must be from the' ro proposed parking structure will e exit f provided where an P 9 p F� p cross any sidewalk. D. Location and rack details for no less than 21 bicycle parking . • spaces. . ' E. Locations and dimensions of all parking spaces and aisleways. No more than 250 compact parking spaces with dimensions of 8 ' e ' ,� may p i S aces �o 'than 1 be feet by 15 feet ma be provided. compact spaces shall marked for compact use ony. P other th required car pool spaces, designated handicapped spaces, and compact spaces shall be no by ,in size. STAFF no smaller than 9 feet b 18.5 feet CONTACT: Jerry Offer, Planning Div'ision4 (639-41 "1). 6. A detailed landscaping plan shall be submitted including types and. sizes of existing and proposed landscaping material. and planting Iodations including d dbuildi g , sidewalks, and roadways. Medium heig ht (6-10 foot tall) ever-green plantings shall be provided e between the sidewalks and parking garage in order to break up the appearance of the structure's large wail openings. These plantings are t o be p rovided i n addition to proposed street trees. STAFF CONTACT: Je rry O f fer, Planning Division, (639-4171). Additional public ... shall be ' dedicated to a..nGrea 'e the 7. right-of-way of Greenburg Road to 49 feet from its centerline along the subject parcel's frontage. A one foot wide non-access strip shall be created along the property's Greenburg Road frontage. Proof 'Of the des",-icat n and establishment of access strip shall be 'dedication ab] non Tigard Engineering' . _ the no -.. iced to � Office. Department. pros the City of T g` CA • Washington County Surveyor's NOTICE OF DECIS/ON-SDA 90-0022/ 90-0033 LINCOLN VIIS Page 24 h,a,J v •sue • • 8. The applicants shah demonstrate that t they have legal al authorization to construct the required revisions to the private Mapleleaf Street approach to Greenburg Road. 9. The applicants shall comply with Washington County requirements; submit plans, obtain Engineering Division approval, and obtain a facility permit for construction of the following public improvements: Al Construct the new Mapleleaf Drive entrance to include three exit lanes (Two left turn lanes and one through/right turn lane) and a straight stacking area. Provide all signal design, timing, and lane striping' revisions at Greenburg Road and Mapleleaf Drive ,ti.ecessary to accommodate this improvement. B) Provide 200 feet of two lane storage on the Locust Street westbound approach to Greenburg Road. These improvements (within S.W.' Greenburg Road right-of-way) shall ^;"- be constructed in accordance, with the requirements of the Washington County Uniform Road Improvement Design Standards. CONTACT: Scott Kin g► Washington Count y Department art ment of Land Use and Transportation, rtation, (684-4632). , 10. A joint use and maintenance agreement shall be executed and recorded on City standard forms for all common driveways. The agreement shall be referenced on and become part of all applicable parcel deeds. The a g r eement shall be approved by the Engineering Department prior' to • recording. , 11. T he applicant demonstrate that storm drainage runoff can be discharg ed into the existing draina eways withou t significantly impacting properties downstream. • 4 12. Prior to issuance of the Building Permit, the owner will be required to show how parking will b e p rovided for construction workers and s for Cons delivery. Public areas traction equipment and mater�_a1.s delive o C streets will not be allowed to be used for this purpose. 13. The applicant shall submit to the City of Tigard Engineering . seas of plans, of sufficient-, s3.te conditions with Department two . p scale, wh t proposed ( to d plan) 9d ~the impervious ious are addition exLst�n and (final approved site particular attention being paid pe a. In add ` • c alculations shall a lso be submitted which dete�nine. the amount o f 4 impervious surface area bLfore and after derelo Pm nt. t shall sub t t to the City of Tigard I ' P .g d Engineeringt i 14. "Department one set of a: .' ed y PP buil'da.n rr�v�. for / Department PP. . g lanai (floor for the the existing� « ,to. . .removed and provided as �.. the r posed na s�trsalcture which is be remo j. , to e �. otcis Shall also b' p . . , total s are' footage of each build 4 � footage Calcu a i.. Ln '�t�. for the existing Seven Story �'�trlu ' are ' g: In aid osr1� o NOTICE or DECISION SDR 90.0022/ 90-0033 LINCOLN VIII Page 25 4 r . \`r r m building, the applicant shall submit a statement which detail its existing use. 15. The applicant shall demonstrate that sufficient parking, for the existing businesses and visitors, is available during the 4 construction of the proposed development. 16. The applicant shall provide evidence that an Indirect Source Permit for the parking area has been obtained from the Oregon. Department of ` Environmental Quality. STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Offer, Planning Division (639-4171). DURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED OFFICE BUILDING AND PARKING FACILITY, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED. (Staff contact, " ,,0( Coy Humphrey, Code Enforcement Officer, 639-4171): 17. No storage of materials shall be allowed on public streets. Junk piles and construction debris shall be screened from view of public streets. 18. No construction shall be allowed to take place between the hours of 9:00 PM through 7:00 AM on. Mondays through Fridays. On Saturdays, no work shall be allowed from 9:00 PM through 8:00 F.M. On Sundays, no work shall be allowed from 9:00 P!4 through 9:003 AM. 19. All construction materials shall be stored on site. 20. A protective fence and canopy shall be required to be installed prior to the start of construction as specified in UBC Chapter 44. The protective fence shall be located along SW Greenberg Road, SW ' Mapleleaf Street, SW Locust Street, and in areas around the proposed building and parking structure where the public will have access. 21. Construction vehicles shall not be allowed to block City streets while waiting to make deliveries (i.e. Concrete trucks, etc.). ,/ Construction vehicles should only be allowed to access the site from SW Greenberg Road and SW Locust Street west of SW 93rd Avenue only. Construction traffic shall not use Oak Street to access the site. Construction traffic shall not use bust Street east of 93rd Avenue to access the site. No Vehicles which are related to the { construction of the subject P oements (including vehicles belon in to em Q loyes e, bec tra p s, material deliverers, etc.) shall be allowed to park on SW Oak Street, SW Locust Street, or SW 93rd Avenue. A THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRI OR TO THE ISSUANCE OF AN •OCCUPANCY PERMIT OR A SATISFACTORY MONETARY PERFORMANCE ASSURANCE SHALL BE POSTED GUARANTEEING THEIR R CO1 PLETION WITHIN A •' � '° I sIx MONTH PERIOD, (Unless noted otherwise, staff contact is Vi Goodwin, Permit Coordinator, 639- contact P 4171). NOTICE OF IDECISYO -S. NDR 90-0022/VAR 90-00 . ... .„. 33 LINCOLN VIII Sage 26 M1 Q Y e . , `f ' • ��1NW (wl t ♦ / ,y ,I w �.. 22. All landscaping materials and other proposed site improvements shall • be installed or financially assured prior to the occupancy of any structui`es. 23. A sign permit shall be obtained prior to the erection of any sign. Sign location and size must be in compliance with Chapter 18.114 of the Community Development Code. STAFF CONTACT: Ron Pomeroy, Planning Division, (639-4171) . 24. The improvements to S.W. Greenburg Road, S.W. Locust, and the • • Mapleleaf Drive entrance shall be approved and accepted by Washington • County and the City of Tigard. THIS APPROVAL IS VAt,ID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE FINAL DECISION DATE NOTED BELOW. D. PROCEDURE 1,. Notice: Notice was published. ,in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: { c X The applicant and owners X Owners of record within the .required distance X The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization '. X Affected government agencies 2. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON February_,,1991 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 1 3, Appealz Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given s . and sent. Appeal fee schedule and forms are available at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 p.m. February 4, 1991. 4. Questions: If you have questions, please call City of Tigard, Planning Department, City of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, Oregon. 02 5 Pi/ et,/A/JA-/ p. --D ,. ,..� . .._ Offer 1,,TE ' .acia.te Planner � d APPROVED 'B$: Keith Liden DATE Senior Planner .. NOTICE OF DECISION-�SDR 90-0022/VAR 90-0033 LINCOLN VIII Pa a 27 • ,� ■ MAY 09 '94 17:03 BOGLE : YTES PTLD P.1 . u i ° . ' . BOGLE&GATES , . ATES L. . ' Zoo s R C '1 E ��. • 222 S �Ccdumbia Sttett :; Portland,OR 97201 MAy 1 0 1994 'TELECOMMUNICATIONS COVER 1994 SHE ,,, , ia �, 99 EVELORMENT p . MIS TRA.NSMISSM CONSISTS,OF 2 FAG (including this cover page). 1 ' L e aI?'��ER.THIS TRANSMISSION : a, t: W! D' sire O FIcEt City of and ,, FA SPY NUS; 6847297 i , , c ;x° P itIVIATIoN NUPlatitt 639-4171 I', Z' JI,,,;,,,. ,OCU'MENt Is 'ROM: '' , s : Carol Lockhart, Legal Assistant SWBETARY: i DipQR AsL pssAG , i your letter dated March 31 1994! Are the ii \ . .F�e., Lincoln Towed Attached is a copy of y� three variances the only xta.trdards f or p arking? If so, update your letter to r ead as follows; "The parkin` conforms to the standards granted tn variance artd development approvals (list number') and these are the only star-4ards which apply",. Please call it you have gues x rn . ,. I j,,,, IF'YOU REc FEWER THAN ALL Ot ThE PATES,OR 1T ANY l,4Gt YOU, TVE T5 NOT Lgo Z PLEB O INHt)RM OUR oplzRATOVI.AS SOON AS FOS9ATZ Thi to�nntunicatiawn may be p.M.iVileged 6t ctrit4i above '!)O WOT PP,RMF1'ACCESS V ANV.OTHER 'kRSON, Xf the inteii c expected ht the ` ence�. 1t'is a private r� a�to the pehsbori tzarn� location this rn ge teiejihorie its 1rnmediattiy�at h ei od t r not uit bcr below,;and m� the twr! �tl did �r'�r�t1y'ar e' � �Of___... risEnius�ti t�a�i�s at the � - r�iTil$ .r all 1P�g.. ib rra address abov0, 1 - CONFIRMATION (S03) 222-1615 • , 503 721-8686 • ' .* y � _ _ 1.,..,...o-:-..'r ��«4.«.a,.:«..+..-!w,•�..-.,::4.--aa.:�..e..,i.:'...-;,....,.."».,�t�..J.a..�a.wz..w,w-.«........�t.;�i..,-..�+.w,1FwrM•�.bt'.::�.,-ii;:4�+kVi.,-,.,r�.m:+11 A,;h» ;.,.i,.x.....- ......,:,M:.-,r»:.i+..t,.M......, • • i,.17 ',w...,,...u,,.-.1.i8.d�.,.,1,,.�,..<a,..JF n..�. �.in:+ G..,-�-+�a„�.� I MRT 09 r RTES PTLD 3 E OGLE..� C 7994 Atpopi, LAJJ •.Ia Cirtf OF TIGARD OREGON it! March 31, 1994 • Carol Lockhart �ockb.art Bogle $4 Oates • 1400 Icoina Center 222 SW Colxnbia Portland, OR 97201 AG♦ Lincoln Towers s, 1 Lockhart: {{ Dear tits.�j O ck '" This letter is , in , response to your request for parking and • improvement information located on property bounded by SW Locust Street, SW Lincoln Street, SW Oak Street, and, W Greenburg Road. The parking conforms to the standards granted in variance and development apptova1s (SIR, 87-08/V 87-07) y (F^R 89-12/V 89-17/M $9e • • 11) , and, (.5DR 90-0022/VAR 90-0033)'a if you have addi t i cna1 qUes ti aas or need additional i n facnat ia n please feel free to call rye K Sincerely, D df:ea ,. Assistant Plaririet • , 13125 SW Fittil i,.:d 1 TOE) 503 684-2772 • A. _ :.t.:..;..W.a«,.,,..n.r•r....,.w«.-.,.. a.J,,.. ..,.i..r....,.o,...w.v1-r,.:d..,l+.......................u.8+..i-+.iw..w,....,.-.r.;.,.;.r+t-.,M...w....<.:,'w.,:. p « r., �a.a..,iM:.,i.r,., ,:'+.-,,...4 m_.!,'-..N,w,...t:.W.l:«,:.....,.s.ti.wx «.6.�L c.�.,�.,.,,.a::-!-,...ii...�. ,:a:uvi .aw,,.::..._,..�«:i0.''k .«A ,.,lM......:.tN.<,, „ �it 71. CITYOFTIGARD OREGON III i i li . March 31 l'994 t . Carol Lockhart ckhart Bogle & Gates 1400 Koin Center 222 SW Columbia' Portland, OR 97201 Re: Lincoln Towers Dear Ms . Lockhart This letter is in response to your request for parking and improvement information located on property bounded by SW Locust , Street, SW Oak Street, and SW Greenburg Road. I . � � � Street, SW Lincoln ,Street S k St d The parking conforms to the standards granted in variance and development approvals (SDR 81--08. V 87 -07) ( CDR 11) , and (SDR 90r-0022/V?i.R 90-0033) , If you have additional questions or need addit ional information please feel free to call me. Sincerely, William D'Andrea Assistant Planner • 13125 SW i �lvd4 r g , OR 97223 503) 689-4171 `r ' Hcsi 1 card r �d 684-277'2 � �5a3j • ^ J ,1'' r may' MAR ;A '94 11:29 BOGLE & G•„TES FTLD 3 P.1 o Bocaz&GATES 4 4 .. - _ M' , , r . LAW OFFICES 1400 WIN Cater b ' S.W.Colunbla$traet Portland,OR 91201 1 ''. 1 �q ', IELECOMMAJNICATIONS COV1ER SHEET ',(, tom: March 22, 1994 5 This TRANSMISSION CONSISTS OF 2 MOSS(including this covet Waage). f ,.at'•a ICJ AN E DELIVER THIS TRSMISSION TO; 1 'r , NAM: Will D', dreg (wit: Planning Department, City of Tigard j FAX,TIELF,COFY NUMEERt 684-7297 • CONS NUMBER: 639-4171 ` 9 THIS DOCUMENT IS FROM; :a 1. r I NAME: Carol Lockhart • • , c��ty tp 9�'n TCt{I �3L'd.R .0 1't1L'lli�. ., r. ADDITIONAL MESSAGE ''� .0 I„ •-n •+rf• ' .I�.w.i�prwrytiprylVlYll'��,NV .. .'. Idlr � l�Y OU FEWER 'IRAN ALL OF THE PAGES,OR IF ANY FACE YOU CIC�I5 NOT aa�EJE,PLEASE INFORM • ' OUR CaPERMO1.AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. 1 CY' E; Thia cortamntMi tion tnOS/be privileged et contain a client confidence It is a priVare merge to the person named abo'ie+ ► If the intended recipient is not at reently st expected at the n where m revolved,please telephone i name4iatety at the confirmation number below,and tnnit a pa twit transmission io US at the above, CONFIRMATION: (5Q3) 222-1515 •r c_ FACSIMILE; (503) 721-366 ; .a. i9 a , °. MAP. 22 '94 11:29 BOGLE & GfTES PTLD S • ud e ki 1 ., ,,,, t • I I r 1-.4,'W OFFICES 1400 KOIN Center Seattle r 222$,W Col tmbla Anchorage Portland, Orogtrn 97201''` liege ue , Tacoma Main Office: (503) 222-1515 Vancouver;LC. Pacaaanllet ($03) 721-3066 Washington, D.C. i , ' Yakima r '' 26788-00001 March , 1994 Q , : William Y And a y 4.C,E M ggj®tma,M Planning Department , City of Tigard Fax No.: 684-7207 , , '.• ' 13125 S.W. Ham. Blvd. ' Tigard, OR 97223 ' Ret Lincoln Towers b Dear With . . Pursuant to our telephone conversation of today this letter is to request est Written r confirmation ye the extent to which parking for the improvement s locate d on I property bounded by S.W. L itUst Street on the North, &W. 11ncoh Street dirt, the East �, . S.W. Oak Street on the South and S,IW. Greenburg J.aad on the West is in compliance wt City of and s zoning nd bud. " � � � � ` r�,g codes. Your letter should address whether parking has the required number of s p aces and complies e� Wirth afl othe r development t ,. standards regarding parking. ` ° a your letter should be sent to my within.. ten days from the f -, receipt receipt of this request. If additional thaw is needed for the preparation of the letter or if I ,; need to contact Washington County, please telephone Die- Very truly yours, �Ij` BOGLE & GATES . . 1,,,,,,,,,,‘,f,td,,Zip, r ' I N b Carol Lockhart Legal Itssistai r cc te es na E a'` 1� I I I JI ,, '. / r �}• , ..w,....._.. ..J,,..•a .. f,x.;.ntW«,.......w __ ....w.,......,... w1._ ...... .._. ..... .,ci«........•...,..1.:na...,..ar.•.a....,...l.,,H wIM'....-.w.A'...r.. ,...«,..... .. ., f ,:� p'•a Ili i � ' v ,, r ' 1 r C't CITY OF TIGARD . • Carol Lockhart OREGON Bogle & Gates 1400 Koin Center 22 2 Columbia SW ' Portland, OR,97201 RE: Lincoln Towers 1 To Whom It May Concern: This letter is in response to your request for zoning confirmation ' with respect to property bounded by SW Locust Street, SW Lincoln Street, SW Oak Street and SW Greenburg Road. The subject property is zoned C-P .(Professional Commercial) and is , identified as such on the attached photocopy of the City of Tigard Zoning District Map. The Professional Commercial zone allows 0 public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, f insurance and real estate services, business support services, among others. This office is responsible for and authorized to make determinations concerning zoning matters. Very yours truly, Z4,1 ,e,1 4L4ita William n°Andrea - E Assistant Planner m0 171 1W� (503) 2 2 ., l..:... ►�125 S Hall blvd,, Tigard, OR 97223 (50$) 639-4171 (503 �$ .^ • ' I • • 1!4)1 I EXHIBIT 1 • CITY OF TIGARD t r NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 87-08 VARIANCE V 87-07 TRAMMELL CROW CO • APPLICATION: Request by Trammell Crow Company for a Site Development Review ' to allow the construction ' of a 13 story building of approximately 200,000 `tl .r square feet as the fourth phase of the Lincoln Center office complex and a 1 Variance to allow a building 176 feet in height where 45 feet' is the maximum a g allowable, and a decrease in the width of compact parking spaces from 85 feet to 8 feet on property zoned with Washington County districts O-C (Office Commercial), R-5 (Residential, 5 units per acre) and R-9 (Residential, 9 units. per acre) . Location: east of SW Greenburg Road, south of SW Locust Street, west and south of SW Lincoln Street and north of SW Oak Street (WCTM 151 35AB lots 800, 801, 900, 901, 1004, 1005, part of 3300, 3301, 3400 , 3402, 3404, 3500, 3600. ) DECISION: Notice is heryeby given that the Planning Director for the City of . • Tigard has APPROVED the above application subject to certain conditions. The , findings and conclusions on which the Director based his decision are as noted below, A. FINDING OF FACT 1. Background The subject property was annexed to the City of Tigard in late April, 1987. Prior to the annexation, two land use applications (Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Special Use Permit) were filed with 1.. Washington County, Also, it was agreed between the City and County that all applications in process at the County would continue even if the final decision occurred after annexation. o-r The Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change (Case No. 87-73-M) to change the use designation from R-5 (Residential, 5 units/acre) and • Institutional to 0--C (Offico Commercial) on parcels located a• immediately north of Oak Street and west of the Lincoln. Street extension4 This was approved by the Board of Commissioners on May 19, 1987, A Special Use Permit for a parkin lot ot (Case No. 87-122-8U) was granted by the County on May 13, 1987 for four residentially zoned r , parcels located at the southwest corner of Locust Street and 93rd,• 1enproperties T residences these . . will be remo' ed and a parking area wi ll be developed in con j unction with the project proposed in this application, The conditions of approval imposed by the County shall remain in affect, On May 18, 1987, the Tigard City Council approved the rezoning of the annexed area in Metzger from Washington county designations to City designations which most closely resemble the County zones , This ,H NOTICE or DECISION - 5bR 87-08/V 87-07 - TRAMMELL CROW CO. PAG E 1 I I . nA4441'., • lb • ordinance (No. 87-22) will become effective on June 18, 1987. The " following review ,utilizes the City Community Development Code rather .. than County regulations .• 2, Vicinity Information. • Residential properties lie to the east of 93rd Avenue and to the . northeast. The, Metzger School property is zoned Institutional in the County and will be zoned R-4,5 (Residential, 4.5 units/acre) in the City. Properties to the north, west, and south are zoned Office Commercial and will be C-P (Commercial Professional). in the City, Primary access for the project is directed to Greenberg Road to the h west and Locust Street, Oak Street and 43rd Avenue border the • ". remainder of the property. 3. Site Information and Proposal Description . The property is presently developed with three office buildings with 'a gross floor area of approximately 300,000 square feet, parking areas, and landscaping, The applicant has recently purchased the three parcels that were subject of the Zone Change (87-73--M) as well as the four parcels involved in the Special Use Permit (87--122-SU) . These properties will be incorporated a$ part of this project The applicant proposes to construct a fourth office building that will have a maximum of 13 floors, a height of 176 feet, and a gross floor area of approximately 200,000 square feet. Within this area about •ti'' 8,000 square feet of service retail space will be provided on the first floor. The building will be located between the two existing office buildings known as Lincoln Center I and II with a 'setback'' of .' approximately 220 feet from the eastern property line. Additional • • parking area will be provided on the site and a second parking { ' ' • w+ , structure will be built immediately south of the new building. ,,.. Access is proposed to be directed primarily to Greenburg Road with • secondary access to Locust and Oak Streets, The entrance to Greenburg, ° •: Road and the traffic signal will be modified to accommodate the additional traffic, The Metzger Progress Community Plan identifies §`';: • Greenburg Road as a minor arterial street and Locust, 93rd, and Oak as local streets • Variances are requested to exceed the maximum allowable height in the ;' • C-P zone of 45 feet and to allow compact parking spaces that are 8 feet in width rather than the required 8,5 feet. �: 4.' • - and NP0 Comments The 'Engineering bivision has the following comments; a., SW Greenburg Road, SW Locust Street. and SW Oak Street are currently under Washington County jurisdiction, SW Lincoln Street is under the jurisdiction of the City of Tigard; The City and County are currently working to transfer the jurisdiction of -- PAGE 2 p"AG • NOTICE O�' DECISION SUP 87�-0$,/V' 87-K�7 `�RAI`'1F��LL CROW CO,C0� �..; • _ . . ., e e '.,/,.. SW Locust and SW Oak to the City. Because of this transfer, the ..,, County desires to have the City issue all improvement permits for • • SW Oak and SW Locust by "blanket" County permit. . . • , . . b. SW Oak Street and SW Lincoln are currently classified as local , streets; however, the Metzger/Progress Circulation Study , ' recommends that all of SW Lincoln and SW Oak from SW Lincoln to SW Greenburg be upgraded to minor collectors. The , Metzger/Progress Study also recommends a direct connection between . SW Locust Street and SW Oak Street via SW Lincoln Street. This , , , connection is also recommended to have a minor collector • • classification, Staff generally supports the above , recommendations relative to the Metzger/Progress Circulation .n Study, Existing improvements on portions of SW Oak and SW Locust 0 , Streets are substandard while all of SW Lincoln is substandard. . . C. Both SW Locust Street and SW Oak Street west of Lincoln Street 1 • . 1 should be improved to minorcollectqr standards at this time which , will require half—street improvements on 'portions of both, However, SW Lincoln should not be improved until the entire .. • connection can be completed. The applicant should sign a waiver , . . of remonstrance for future improvement of SW Lincoln Street. , . . d The applicant proposes two new access points to the site, one on , SW Locust near SW Lincoln and one on SW Oak Street near the recommended SW Lincoln Street connection, These proposed access ''• , points appear to be acceptable under current conditions, However, once the SW Lincoln Street correction is completed, these access . , points should be moved to SW Lincoln Street. Leaving these access ..••points in the proposed locations after the SW Lincoln Street connection is completed will have a negative impact on traffic , t s : .... flow and safety at these intersections. Both the City and County . , . recommend the relocation of these access points , , .. .. e, The applicant' s traffic analysis indicates that significant . 0 improvements are needed at the site' s access on SW Greenburg Road . 11 (signalized) and on the site's internal drive, Because Greenburg . 4,. . , ' . Road and the signal at this location are under county jurisdiction, County staff has performed a significant amount of review of the applicant' s proposal. In addition, the Oregon Department of Transportation has reviewed the proposal for impacts to the Highway 21.7 and SW Greenburg Road interchange, The County is recommending significant improvements to this intersection. 1 „ f f. The County staff have indicated that the County will continue to favor the public arterial (Greenburg Road) over the private approach (Mapleleaf) in setting the traffic signal timing. The . . - County will continue to prioritize the signal green time to clear • Greenburg traffic, Therefore, level of perVice on Mapleleaf will . ' not be quite as good as predicted by the applicant's traffic analysis, This is a possible concern for the applicant but is ,., .4. expected to result in negligible negative impacts on the public streets . If delays on Mapleleaf reach a level unsatisfactory to ' , . .. . the property owners at a fUture time, they may wish to consider NOTICE or ,bECISION — SOR 87-08/V 87-07 — TRAMMELL CROW CO, — PAGE 3 , — . r , ....: ..:...,..« _.,...„,...mow...,.... _. ._.,,. ....�„ •,..... ,o.,a _ ,._. 1.• 1' e t construction of additional turn lanes (e.g. , a northbound right—turn lane on Greenburg) to further increase intersection . . f g. The applicant proposes to utilize the existing storm drainage system developed . y ped fog previous phases. However', certain • ; engineering analytical checks should be made. h. The proposal will utilize an existing 8 inch public sanitary sewer that traverses the site from east to went and connects to the Ash Creek interceptor„ re • The Metzger hater District suggests that water service be connected to the 12 inch line located in Oak Street. d` • _ Also, street improvements east of 95th Avenue on Oak Street should be coordinated with the District to enable the extension of this line to Hall Boulevard The US Post Office notes that a mail room needs to be provided on the - first floor, The Building Inspection Division has no objection to the proposal., No other comments have been received. B. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION • 0' The proposed development is consistent with basic Community Development Code requirements for the proposed use, landscaping, access, parking, and visual clearance. The issuer raised by the Engineering Division are - addressed under the conditions of approval noted in Section C below. Further discussion is warranted relating site, parking, and Landscaping .., plan details and the variance request for exceeding the maximum building height and reducing parking space width, . w.: Landscaping The applicant has presented a conceptual landscaping plan which indicates that slightly over the 15 percent area requirement is provided and that. it will be possible to meet Code standards, Prior to iessuing building permits, a detailed plan must b. developed that addresses maintenance of existing mature trees where practical, screening and visual buffering for nearby residences — particularly those xocated immediately' to the ,,, • northeast and southeast -- and the installation of a sufficient number of trees (one tree per seven spaces) in and adjacent to the parking areas, . • Parking Although it is clear that the project will exceed the City standard for • number of parking spaces additional information should be `submitted to . indicate the total floor square footage and number of parking spaces for the entire Lincoln Center development, • NOTICE OF DECISION — SD R 8 7�-08/V 87- 0 7 — TRAMMELL GROW O. p GE 4 • i I • • , C - .. ta. '>v .ti.:...a ....1,-,..w.eL.. . _ _ i •...... ......, ..N.+.Sa....,_,4,N..,Iw.,r...lie.iN',.,A.,.+.'nJ...a...,.J...I,,... t r. Ytl • • The Code requires that secure bicycle parking spaces be provided at a .. ratio of one space for every 15 required vehicular spaces• Based' upon '', this formula, 38 bicycle spaces are heeded in conjunction with this building. No bicycle parking facilities were observed anywhere on the site and therefore it will be most beneficial to distribute these spaces throughout the project. Spaces should be supplied within both parking structures as well as in the `vicinity of building entrances. 1I 'Variance I 1 ' , ,Y Section 18.134.050 of the Code. contains the following criteria which apply ��,p tol the building lding height' and parking space width variances requested as part • } of this application. I 1. The proposed variance wi1 be materially detrimental to the y: purposes of this Code; L . conflict with the policies, of the Comprehensive `Plan; to any other applicable policies and standards; and to other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity. 2. There are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the . ; lot size or shape, topography, or other circumstances' over which ,the ' applicant has no control and which are not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district. .. 3 . The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this Code and Cite standards will be maintained to the g reatest extent that is ,,' reasonably possible, while permitting some economic use of the land.' 4. Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic land Iforms or parks will not be adversely affected any more than would occur if the development were located as specified in the Code, •• 5. The hardship is not self—imposed and the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. .,n Height r • The applicant satisfactorily addressed the above criteria and the staff would like to offer some additional comments. The standard 98,020 of the height allowance in the C—P zone is 45 feet',' Section lr8. - , . Community Development Code allows a maximum height of 75 feet in a ,`•• t- cor mercial zone when the total building floor area does not l exceed 1.5 1 times the area of the site, the setback equals at least one half of i.:a building height, and the structure does not abut a residential zoning district, The proposed bt ld�ng obviously surpasses the I 75 standard, bu t i t i s consistent with the other criteria because the •—, total floor area of Lincoln Center will be less than the size of the' property, the building does not abut a residential zone, and the 1'. ° propos ed setback of approximately 220 feet exceeds the 1y6 fort �' ", building height. C °' 11, II. I r r.. — - • 0° SCE 0 !UE I �C � 8 N Y' 7-���v ��'--b7 >�fGLI.� CHOW CO,�Ci�1 PAGE 4 i T� r • r . , • The primary intent of the Code height and setback requirements is to ,,!` provide adequate light and space between buildings, particularly when different zoning districts are involved'. Though the building is taller e. than allowed, the proposed setback will result in a less imposing building than a 4'5 foot tall structure with a 20 foot setback which *; would meet Code standards. No adverse impacts resulting from the variance are anticipated relating • to traffic imp&ct.. [The building square footage is within Code requirements and the traffic generation will not exceed what would be . expected from full development' of this site. As noted in the Engineering Division comments, several. traffic .related issues will need to be finalized prior to completion of this project. r Parking 'S ace Dimensions nsions r 4 The above criteria have also been adequately addressed by the applicant. The reduction in compact space width from 8.5 to 8 feet is { N minimal, The Washington County' standard is 7.5 feet and the present this parking lot is developed with th�s. standard. e. w. C. DECISION Based upon the discussion above, the Planning Director approves ,SDR 87-08/V 87-07 subject to the following conditions', 1. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF SITE WORT( OR FOUNDATION PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: A a. The applicant shall demonstrate that the existing oh—site and ! off—site storm drainage system is sized to carry the storm run—off , from a 10—year storm following full development and that the additional run—off caused by their development will cause no significant impacts on downstream preporties, b, The applicant must submit a revised site plan demonstrating that future relocation of the SW Locust Street and SW Oak Street accesses ' ' The revised to aW Lincoln does not significantly a.c�intly inip�ct the', site,d , `� site plan must be approved by the Planning' and Engineering Sections, P 2, PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING CONSTRUCTION' FOLLOWING ISSUANCE � PERMITS, THE NG CONDITIONS MU�� BE COMPLETED OR ASSURED.. A LL CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS Ei T. NOTED BELOW MUST BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF OCCUP AN CY PERMITS: 1 , a. The applicant shall demonstrate that the oh-sit. e private e storm m drainage system will be operated and maintained by an enforceable maintenance agreement affecting benef iting properties. b. Standard half—street improvements' including sidewalks,, curbs, streetlights driveway aprons,` ' storm drainage and utilities shall be ` ' . ' ' installed along the SW Oak Street frontage. said improvements alone SW Oak Street shall be built to, City minor collector • NOTICE OF DECISION — 'SDk 87-08/V 87-07 — 1"RAMMELL Ci/OW CO, PAGE 6 , . , ., ' .. ...r,..'1............. ..._,_ _..,...,....«...A. .,..._ _.._...,..k-,.._... ,.,,......'AI,.....,.._..._r.,,_..a..+» ...+...__w,y.t,_ _ .,.,.. ....,... .,., ,..,.w_, i.,y..c.._,.wr...4J_...+....F.,.:.4.....r..;.r.,» ..,...r,.»,.-+-...,.r.... N M I • standards and conform to the alignment of existing adjacent improvements. The City will be issuing the necessary public o improvement permits for this requirement: c Standard half—street improvements including sidewalks, curbs, streetlights, driveway aprons, storm drainage, and utilities shall ;, O be installed along the 'SW.' Locust Street frontage. Said m improvements shall be constructed to City major collector standards and conform to the alignment of existing adjacent ' improvements. The City will be issuing the necessary permits for these improvements, •, d. Additional right—of—way shall be dedica ted to the public along the SW Oak Street frontage to increase the right—of—way to 30 feet from centerline, the description for said dedication ; shall be tied to the existing right--of-way centerline as established by • e.' Washington County, The dedication document shall be on City forms ' and approved by the Engineering Section, Contact Jon Feigi on in Engineering for forms and further information, e. Additional right—of--way shall be dedicated to the public along the . entire SW Lincoln Street frontage to increase the right—of—way to , F 30 feet from centerline. The description for said dedication shall be tied to the existing right-of—way centerline In A addition, the applicant shall dedicate to the public a 60 foot wide stri P. in direct alignment and extension of, SW Lincoln Street across the entire north—south' distance of tax lot 3300,�� map ,a,.1, 131 85AB, The dedication shall be on City forms and approved' by the Engineering Section, Contact Jon Feigion to obtain forms and further information. �. f. The applicant shall provide at least three westbound approach b , lanes on Mapleleaf at Creenburg Road The applicant shall construct modifications to the existing intersection and traffic signal installation as required to accommodate the widened " Maple leaf approach at Creenburg Road, Said improvements' will Ma ,:. require the submittal of detailed construction drawings to the City and County for, approval, • g, The applicant shall sign a waiver of remonstrance agreement to ' participate in a potential future local improvement district for 1. ' ' the improvement of SW Lincoln Street`; Included in the agreement will be the applicants assurance 'torelocate' the SW Locust Street • and SW Oak Street accesses to SW Lincoln street, Said agreerlrent will be prepared by the City and recorded with Washington County :' once executed •', h, Construction of proposed public imp vem nit shall not cot mence' ' until after the Engineering Section, has issued approved public improvement plans, The applicant must post a 100 percent , !. `.. performance assurance, the payment of a permit, and a sign {' p � p j sign installation/streetlight fee, Also, the execution of a street opening permit or construction compliance agreement shall occur Prim" to, or concurrently with the issuance of approved public; improvement plans. • , I I I .. " • NOTICE OF DECISION � SDR 87-08/V 87--07 TRAMMELL CROW CO. — PAGE 7 , r ..»n......._n...w. a,..1 u,r.w..0 _i._.._ i a.,..,i ._.....,. v.. ,.,... ...r-.,r. .t..,J_ .. ♦ ... .i "-" , w t' .t • r. . is Upon completion of cursory review, seven (7) sets of plan—profile public improvement construction plans and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a Registered Professional Civil Engineer, detailing all proposed public improvements shall . ' 1 be submitted to the Engineering Section for approval, Submit improvement drawings and related data to john Hagman in Engineering. 3. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE a. The applicant shall provide confirmation ,of the total gross floor area of the entire Lincoln Center complex. b. A revised site plan shall be submitted for Planning Director F. r approval which contains the following ' .• (1) Par kin g s ace dimensions (standard 9' x 18' ; compact 8" x 151 ) � . (2) One handicapped space per 50 required spaces (12' x 18') . m„ (3) 38 secure bicycle spaces distributed throughout the Lincoln ti ` " Center complex (bike rack design must also be submitted for 1 approval) detailed landscaping plan shall be submitted for Planning c. A d p g p Director approval which contains the following: (1) Identification of all plant materials (2) Screening of parking areas. (3) 3'ustification for removal of existing trees along the eastern boundary of the project. (4) Compliance with Chapter 18,100 and Section 13,120.l80(a)(4) of the Community Development Code. 4. Landscaping materials shown on the approved plan (Condition 3.c.) shall be installed prior to occupancy, t I 5. The conditions of' approval for Special Use Permit (87-122 -SU) and Comprehensive Plan Amendment and.: Zone Chi Inge (87-78—M) shall be satisfied. 6. This approval is valid if exercised within or e year of the final decision date noted below, , NOTICE OF DECISION — S JR 87-08/V 87-407 — TRAMMELL CROW CO, - PAGE 8 , ,I . ' . ii ,.r......' .... G'- -....„.,., , ,......,t4.n n,...._:..+._....._.,:,..:..,. 4-+.....w.,....+.:,. .r,3.n.....'..y.._n.k,1...... ...A.'4 ` _.r. .- .. .au....!•.,,...Yant,..A»,Idw.+'r.:r.IMI....u....,.l.Mu.....rr.rn,—II1.tir.._..-.: .�.4i.u...I.AYC4.t...i h a • u• F H r • ry" D. PROCEDURE r y ,. in 1. Notice: Notice was published n the newspaper, posted at City. Hall 1 ' and mailed to: XR The applicant & owners i ' XX Owners of record within the required distance . ", XX The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization ti XX Affected governmental agencies 1 2. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL •+' � ��� ��BE�� FINAL ���ON � June 22,� 1987, sf• �, UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. -- �I ., ;J�' 3. Appeal: An! p art y to the a pp eal this decision in accordance with Section. 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the ' Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must .... I be filed with the CITY RECORDER within 10 days after notice is given and sent , I . ' 1. The deadline filing o� an appeal is 3:30 P.M. June 22i 1987 .4. Questions: If you have any please call the City of Tigard c • Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , PO Box ' 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223 639-4171, j e ..� t '7.� PREPARED BY, Keith S. Liden, Senior n r P J annex' DATE 4, ,:, William A Monahan, Director of Community, Development DATE APPROVED is (kL t cn%3277P) r 242.,6 I ti 1 I 7--- 1111 1111111— .11•11--mmill hi1: dett. 54 35 . ri---- lig . .4111, , . a H ti t L"' i:Ha ,_,,J,4*,, driittn ' —au — I I (Li. kll Erg ...... is It r ''.. \)* 'N„ • ti V I s rH„Lr4.c C i � ....,,q,.....„.„....,.. , ,.. ... , 4/ te. \'e 1 _111 �r� __I_ i , ,% Si K' 144-'''1, ,` ,, �� /%. '. I\ ,,/.."----'—"..—"'”' I e i I ' r NOTICE OF DECISION — SDR 87-08/V 87-07 — C. CO,T t�'lELL ��J RA � �,J PACE 9 )¢ Y - U J.. .ti .�.......... ..... .i...,....�.• ... ...............a._.��I.._1,:..�.1�_ ...J.,�.L.._.�,..._a..-......,.. .... ... �.� .»,.�. .,......,..:�7, «._» ..,........_....__ ....__....»...,...,-...-..,.�,.,.x.x...,.,_,4...,i.�._...._H.�......,.»...�� ....�, axr..�..,....M_,..�....a.........,».-....a_..�..«.I...,..».,,.,..........a.•.+...+.....-.�,.,-...kx. � MAY E0 '94 16:14 BOGLE & GATES PTLD 3 P.1 ^ y,,; i BOGLE&GATES LAW=ICES 1400 WIN Center 222 S.W.Columbia Street •, Rutland,OR 97201 H • ' , , TELECOMMUNICATIONS COVER SHED } DATE: May 20, 1994 f ON CONSISTS OP 3 PAGES (including this cover page). 7' • . MIS T%i,AR�IaIMSISRI +Ct7Afi S 1 . PLE.ASE DELIVER THIS TRANSMISSION TO; NAME Udall R. coley 1, „r �3 mcE: City of Tigard 1 , A COPY NUMBER: 684-7297 t:;. CONFrammaN DER: 639-4171 THIS DOCUMENT IS FROM: 7 NAME: Carol Lockhart, Legal Assistant SECRETARY: I ` ADDITIONAL MESS IF`ALT RECEIVE FIIV+IER.`HAN1 AIL OF`TEE PAGES,OR IF ANY PAGE YOU RECD IS NOT LEGIELZ)P SE INFORI O OPERATOR.A$SOON PO$SIR7 P, NOTICE; This cOnnnunieation may be privileged or contain a client confidentte. It is a private mmisage to the person named • above. IX)NOT PERMIT.ACCESS BY ANY OTAE,R 'lE.RSQ1V. If the intended recipient is not currently or a peeled at the „ , of tretnisshicn rri us at the address above ly ati tie calh#Ilxnatioh nun►6er fiia arad 1rll atl . Jlocatson t�rhere this message ''asi received p please tele�•hone Us imknedlate pages f this " CONFIRMATION!DN! (503) 222-1515 „ FACSIMILE: Ur .. .. ,t. ' .. ! ..-. ill• - �•. 7 _ n D • .,,..,.. .,. e ,, . .........'.,___..__._,.,_. . ,......... ..... .... _..__.,.. ._...+.._-..._.....-._.,_...,....,as.�...,.... ...............,.....,....._.,....w...,.,,.......4... .,.,....d........,_._.._,_._..,.._...._..a_,..._..,.,..-....,...,..,......k._a..-».:.,.-........al.,...«_,_ MAY 20 '94 16:14 BOGLE &. GATES PTLD 3 P.2 y w. $ OGLE&GATES it LAW OFFICES 1400 1( 1N Center Seattle 222 S.W. Columbia Anchorage Portland, Oregon 97201 Bellevue . Olympia Maim Office: ($03) 222-1S1S errata Facsimile: (503) 721-3666 Vancouver, B.C. � Washington,,D.C., 26786-0 0?I. t May 2O, 1994 ' EAS I 14, NE Fax No.: 6844297 Randall R. Wooley City Engineer ,. City of and p r 1D3125 SOW Hall Blvd. V 4 . Tigard, OR 97223 ill Re: SF Oregon Co., Ltd./Lincoln Center Complex i Dear Mr. Wooley: e - . I am writing with, respect to the commercial complex commonly known as Lincoln Center and requesting confirmation that the access to and from the two-story parking structure located West of I,incohi V at the corner of S.W. Locust Street and S.W. Greenburg Road complies with the requirements of City of ` igard's Engineering Department, as well as with applicable land use regulations and building standards of the City's Community Development elopment Department, original ,irpe rpof l alyo r c othne ve rsar a ntior svi tauth ct uWxe i l a d a An ednrt e at,o it is c om ln y V u tpdreorpsota sed d itvg h two ays , to SpW; Locust Street, Subsequently, pursuant to the recommendations set forth in a . traffic analysis, access was limited to one driveway wilich in turn, resulted in the removal ' ' cif several parking islands in order to provide for additional. parking spaces. • � Based upon the informations p lease review our records regarding in g pens or approvals with respect to changing the number of driveways for the parking structure adjacent to Lincohi V You may wish to refer to SDR. 89-12 which sets forth the recom mendation that the proposed accesses to S,W, Locust Street axial. S.W. 93rd avenue • should be re-evaluated. Changing the access to the afore-meritioned roadways was not . listed SDI,-12 as one of the conditions which had to be satisfied prior.; d pri to the issuance of building • permits for co and parking strcture, P I. wV.6.6ru66.4..w/.NW.N.v AHkn-ti, ..mM+-..r v+14"�w...-+..........«......n....+..uu+.i.,a.n•••�v'v.n ..�..e+al.._ .:.i+...n«.nwn...+w«•�-.�w�w.�.r....t.i. .i�rb..�M.l hk...661.. n-w.11' nh�M..l...r..J..u++.`..,..,1V�wJiwi.4nw.4L.._.ohm..w.,any..LyvNnu..i�,..n+.. .-um..�iie v»,,....:..]�mau.iin.-'tlnw,nr w_u«i.i.u..�4+.1i..bar...h.w.N.+.-��J...+/�Ll+�w.4.:.w...: MAY 2 '94 16:14 BOGLE & GATES PTLD 3 P.3 Randall R. Wooley May 20, 1994 Paged After reviewing your records, please furnish this office with either a copy of the permit issued by the Engineering Department for the parking structure's single accessway via S.W. Locust Street, or a letter confirming that the existing driveway has been approved by your department and complies with all land use regulations and building statr,dards. Also, please furnish us with any document approving the closure of one of the proposed driveways or state in your letter that the closure received approval* c � e � a us the refinance of the entire co t ter Lincoln Center complex is scheduled to close before month-end, your immediate response to'this request would be greatly appreciated. ' i1112ulk you in advance for your assistance. I � I . / Please to ephorile � or Walter 11V�cMortues of t office if you have questions. Ve ry trial yours, truly f' B GLE& GA'.1'ES 41,e4e Carol Lockhart Legal Assistant , cc: Walter W, lVicMonies, Esq. I, I Stanley Sanruels, Esq. 59\,cre2\ r�►o,LxsrwooLE?,TZ II I , I , I BOGLE&GATES I I I I I I I • • • • .n,lr•J m..:w4.r .- .M1r.n H f� »Y'�L rv. .w rrMN ..�n ..n!'. .nn b vMrl ��.r. ' ..n:i•W,•i 1 J.•rl.a—h-.-JM1.x...4-•:N....+-•+FSr. • • (:sr , -1 1 • i IF.I,- CITY OF TIGARD April 14, 1994 OREGON Brad Knodell Melvin Mark ;brokerage Company Lincoln Center 10220 SW C.reenburg Road .Suite 235 Portland, OR 97223 Re: Site Development nt Fcv�e w a nd Variance ce Approvals and cc ° � u Lincoln Certificates of Occupany for coln Center , Dear Mr. Knodell; i L ncoln Center is zoned Commercial-Professional (C P) which allows professional office uses and a limited amount of ancillary business 's activities, such as restaurants and retail sales. ' .. The initial land u se approvals for much of Lincoln Ce nter was conducted b y Washington County prior to annexation to the Cit y of Tigard. In addition to the initial Site Development Review, Variance and Lot Line Adjustment approval for Lincoln Tower V, the City of ' Ti reviewed another Site Development Review and. Variance in and 1987 for and office tower. A copy of this s other S Dev py staff report is enclosed. After our meeting, I was under the impression that your offices has •. . copies of the Certificates Occupancy for struct ures within Lincoln Center, if not, please contact the Buildi n g Division for these copies Please feel free to contact me concerning this information, o i - Sincerely, Mark Roberts Assistant Planner • I � n . 13125 SW Hall Blvd, rlgord, OR 97223 (603) 639-4171 l b (503) 684-2772 g • • • �`' b • N.. May 24, 1994 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON • 4. I Carol Lockhart, Legal Assistant Bogle Cc Gates 1400 KOIN Center 222 SW Columbia Street. Portland, OR 97201, • I I I I f P Re: Lincoln Center V The location and design of the driveways to the Lincoln Center parking structure were approved by the City during development of Lincoln Center V. The driveways as they currently exist are in compliance with the requirements of the City as set forth in the , SLR 89-12 decision. rah: C Sin morel C Y I Randall R Cooley City Engineer • I rw/linc.5 • • I i I ti 13125 8W Hdfi 8Ivd, Tigordi OR 97223 (503) 639.4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 - • • 1 ' 1 .lip t � ', 7 I- �. 1n,.L„,-..(H• .;.1 ,.,r.w......,,u.,l„..., .,,«,,.., ✓,.,t..._ n, .....,«,.ia:..M,:i.-.,,.b„, .IJ,...,..6;IMr.!.....,_.M d... .., ,. ,1,'wxi..a.....c...M..i.,v..i ....»w..i,.• .!1.,,_....«w «•ti'..i-..+»,..,,•.,,-,LU .-.,.,....,.................a wl,m.,:,u,wt..iH,ta.w.a,,..-.ur'Lr�a'_ • y/�8w��l111lHllli” July 6, 1990 CITYOFTIRD - OREGON Ann P. Creswell Assistant Project Director Trammell Crow Co. 10260 S.W. Greenburg Road I , Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Lincoln Center Dear Ann: The Community Development Department has reviewed the status of Lincoln Center as it relates to zoning, street access, and procurement of the necessary , permits And certificates of occupancy. Our staff finds that: 1. The zoning_for- all of Lincoln Center is C-P (Commercial Professional) 4; which allows professional office uses and a limited amount of ancillary y' business 4ctivitie6, such as restaurant, and retail sales. 2. The necessary public street right-of-way dedications and street • I improvements related to the Lincoln Center project have been completed . . �. and accepted for maintenance by the City. { ' 3. All necessary building permits and certificates of . . . its d ' occupancy c havve obtained from the City Building Inspection Division for Lincoln Tower ?` V. Copies of an charge for them are and Lincoln Co ie these documents d the ch ' attached. < assistance. I t. Please contact me if I can be of further a s Sine re r I•eith S. Liden ' Senior Planner it o Building Official Brad R st a c, I3 ad r 9 • jo hn Hagman, Engineering 3 iv, c RESWELL/kl I I 1 I I 13125 4 W HlI Blvd.,PyC ,Bad37 Tigard,O�� ors 97223 5Q3 39- • r9 ,..,_.., ..4.,;_,.,......_........,._„.1 ..:1,. —.:�,.,,...,., .r. , _�.,_-1�.....,.., ...-,.,,.. .,..,.......................�... .,.,v,_,.,4 t,.»._.Ir.� u.7k >,•.-.,wxM ,..•-..,• ,......,. �..•. .,.«,,.. ,._.... ,. .. Trammell C ompany - FI��I '�r, 1 r Y • . . .:.�u�r e'ri,�r ,rr+I r:'.'• :rur 1 !i r. �., _➢ -r 7. r v nn^^�"" 'r ti m,,.,. •sn. v r..., .,.w«,-... J.r.. u „,:r 1 +"f -r,.«. T.r.,r•.r , .,� W l�r,. ,,. , :..- a,- .srh-t, r H '4.:^#,'fi It'i: �..�.1 ,,,..� , y {.M. 1C -.....ty*'L v I"' ,...,. 1 Y 'S J,t u .tu 4:,x.tP}„�:d�i�•-.i.���7 Y�"a. r. ,v�r . e+lyy C`d�W .IC,.w, kltP .,.,, NFf "'',,;rwln;.,,. +Ix:.r. t k.. ,t.7,y't., r.frt,:.,,. ! ,I..ad r,� {,• �.,4,r�t.. .,1,� ..,,s !1,�4a.�x..�,:d �.-��'� .., �i�•YJ,M(.1 r• �I.ll”.r. I,.� . .. , { C� �. •r � I 4 , Post Office Box 5396 10260 SW Greenburg Road , Portland, Oregon 97228 Portland, Oregon 97223 June 7, 1990 503/245-9400 • I 1 . I I I I Mr. Keith Laden I C City of Tigard I 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. `JUN 8 1990 Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Permanent Financing Requirements Lincoln Center • lea r K ext� h: I I Per our telephone conversation, the following information needs to be included in the • body of a letter addressed to Trammell Crow Company in regards to the above mentioned project: Zoning: Paragraph stating that the Lincoln Center office buildings are in compliance with all zoning ordinances; (please include a copy of the zoning map). Access,' Paragraph stating that all' streets n ecessary for `access to Lincoln eet n Center are dedicated and accepted for maintenance and public use If you I � x could! also copy permits d t s occupancy for Lincoln mc, on all the errnY s an �el�txfica a of y pY p p �' ... Tower an d Lincoln V, I would gread y appreciate it. Thank .• • 1 yo u for your a ss s's t ante, Keith. Please call should you n eI e d clarification. rification. I . I I , . I Sincerely, TRAMMELI CROW COMPANY CROW I . II 6,1 /2„.(//2 I I 1 . n P. Creswell Creswel ' Assistant Project Director 1, A I I I I . I I I ` o A t1~ a i- � '✓ iii' If, h''1'{ �•� �,' r- i • ' ., .,«,a��.�,.».,-,�..- �.:u.,:,...»,��x'.r�.,..4a*.:ln«.�,.,.«.... ..�1.r«� .,:..:..,+„y..�a-1.1��x.+::..,.-........�.w..�...a' �;sa..'.�l:M-w.::�.�,au.w..,.,�4+�.i.`r..t:.,...w»u.�.:�.-.,.:.,'v� '.....e M„-„w.+.i,..r+.....:.rF:i.':,�:a.,M+,::.tt:....'.,,-..,mw-.-..,:,>»r..:«...�.r'.,..rw.c..:.Ar«..,..o..•.,...wr�.r..._.�.,...aeT,i;4,rna G..anJ..,c.a..rvY�w.4 .�.c.�.?t�::.;,,..m... • • BULLIVANT, HOUSER, BAiLEY, PENDERGRASS & HOF`FMAN ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1400 PACWEST CENTER 12H S.W. FIFTH AVENUE PORTLAND, OREGON 97204-3797 (503) 228-6351 FACSIMILE:(503)295-0915 CABLE ADDRESS:PORTLAW DONALD J. EKMAN TELEX:5101010485 Direct Dial (503) 273-0418 8ULLIVANT' January 5, 1990 , 511,11J Mr. Keith Liden a 0' e dwt 4A , 1 Cit of Tiard U�� ' 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard,d OR 97223 Re: Lincoln Center Ph ase IV Limited Partnership Dear Mr. Liden: , �5 a Hold Harmless Agreement which Enclosed g was drafted in connection with the connection of the , public storm drain to the private storm drain at Lincoln Center. A copy• of the Hold Harmless Agreement was sent to Tim Ramis on December 19, 1989. It is any yet received 'a copy of understanding the City has not e �' Y py this Agreement.' If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Verytuyyour- , • aid- '"Ekma .:�... I, DJE/a ek • C En l Su �r cc: Mr.. David Blake i I 9 TILE O F10E EDP ..92 B93d EA F ( ) 4f0o CoLUleiA cENr~R'•701 ~IrTH AVENUE gEATTLEy MA;Hi N c1at 98104 VAwcbUVal or.r-IcE•(aoa)e9-242d •(503)225,1160 485 + VEHy WASHINGroN 9Nodo os wi:sT 13TH laTtail=Er VAid�cotJ a • • • f'.=�n .-w,ww,,,:A�..�an...�! :....;.+yw ..._r^r ...,«.u1x.....-w... 4.............. .,Juai.....M.,..n....rw., ,.,�...,. „ M:ti,....,...».,...«t,.w.,.rw...:w,...«:e.,.aJ..-,.i».ice.+. ...+........ ,........ :...d4....?.:-..,.,vt'a,.,:«.,M.rti'..,,,a .wd,...r...,..w,.,.:A..:-.-.a,.+1....,_uf., 1..+..,.:...ai...�..r....,.iJ.'�d...,:.,w.rgall.i,_ a' ' memo to: randy, brad, keith _ _(' -- � foam: ed yy� ykyk .,� re: Lincoln 5 J ! 11 IL 11 date: January 23, 1990 ,� ' �* ( , 'CO he SITUATION: ,w(2)1, Before �we wore going to issue the building permit � . three conditions had to be satisfied: i1 ; 1) . sign a hold-harmless agreement on the storm drainage. 2) . sign a non-remonstrance for a potential LID to extend 92nd/93rd from Locust to Oak. 3). satisfy the county on the improvements to be made to Greenburg. On this last issue...we have "security' to guarantee that Mapleleaf will be improved. the problem there was that trammel-crow doesn't own all the land. Also, once the county determines exactly what improvements are necessary, based on trammel-crow's ` engineering analysis, then we still would ask trammel-crow to provide security. I assume that this would either be to agree to put the project in the already formed ' LID, or to re-assign the security now on Maplelea :. WHAT TanWE that the improvements log-jam. issue tenant improvements permits guarantee p will be built. not alienate the county. ' � PROPOSAL: ha ve tr ammel-crow give Us a letter �. g reein to keep e p th e sec.urity on maplelea2� and addition, agreeing to fold any improvements to Greenburg into the 92nd lid. PROBLEMS WITH THAT? obviously,. ,', - rth e improvements mp ro vements to g. reenburg will ill not actually be constructed before lincoln 5 is occupied. but the im p rovementg to mapleleaf ' probably would not have eith e r. t he c ounty may feel that were Undermining t their position* have to give the m assurance s that we have the necessary security. , Xf: this .will work,: let's do it today. Thanks... . } t ,.,......•ay�.,,,•,+.»a,4_14.411.....<.__ ,Y.,.1 ... ...... •...I...«... ......,...a....,-,., .1..........----...u.... ...- .g.:_, .aa..........,:..a--.4 ;4-.T ,-„-....,..-.t1:?r-,-..w-a...:,«.u......•;.:.,ra,.w,G.»:ror r.:r.r.Arr.{..•_,..•',..o 4.r...urr.,..••;..,..,.wF;;:4.1.1lF44 wr,r.,..,,-...,..-.ue.a rrr..Lwa...r,r .. r : •: 9 , memo n - keith 1 to: randy, brad, k from: ed )i..„„ re: lincoln 5 , date: January 23, 1990 I I SITUATION: 1 M p A y, � , a that lincoln 5, we said to issue the building permit for �. Before we were going t g p 1? ■ three conditions had to be satisfied: ` 1 ) . sin a hold-harmless agreement on the storm drainage. � g I I by 21 � sign a non-remonstrance for a potential. LID to extend 92nd/93rd from ' Locust to Oak. 3). satisfy the county on the improvements to be made to Greenburg. L. On this last issue..•we have "security" to guarantee that Mapleleaf will be improved. the problem there was that trammel-crow doesn't own all the ]:and. AlSo, once the county determines exactly what improvements are necessary, based on tra.dmel-crow's engineering analysis, then we still would ask trammel-crow to provide security. 1, assume that this would citherl be to agree to put the project in the already ' formed LID or to re-assign the security now on Majpleleaf. WHAT WE WANT: break the log--jam. issue tenant improvements permits. guarantee that the improvements will be built• not alienate the county. .. I I � PROP,ISAL: have ramm give us a letter agreeing to keep t trammel.e,l�crow .,eep he security on I p ements to mapl leaf, and addition, agreeing to fold any ` �i rev Greenburg into in addi a the r'92nd lid. M obvtousl , the improvements greenburg will not act. I PROBLEMS „ I � to g' g actually du ied. but th be 1 p the �.xtt rovements to mapleleaf Y , I p I . . i.rcoln S �.s r probably would not have either. oc I the county ma y feel that we're undermining their position. We ll have to give them assurances that we have the necessary security. If this will work, let's do it today. Thanks! tI I I I I I I } I ! II I I . I I I I I � r, . • a • I I . a a « Ian 0 • • • • • • ..w:.;•r...>,x..,u .....-.....L..+.w,..—u.r+-,....,..a..+.,,.,wFx».�.n,... »..+•.t,:..�,.�:,+.a.ua�.. .... ..-.«,.v......�`«,.,» ..�,.,..,..».......« w'.wiw•a....,x:-++.•.a.....i1�•..L�...'..1a.:su.,�.«a».«o-.z,N...,i.a..+--.�wi.. C+:.✓.,µ�.,.,..,,.,,n�w..hm,.«w...,1,,...-.,-•...«+:.!«.��++ n,..4t»M,_...,,,.N!.�«�.wd n..,..i..r.ta.'«:.>tl.c..NN „•..!.'�,;: ■ • CITY OF. TIGARD, OREGON TO: Brad January 29, 1990 • FROM: Ed Murp • • RE: Trammell-Grow/Lincoln V • • We have received the materials we needed from Traaamel1-Grow on Lincoln • You may now release tenant improvement permits, or any other necessary building permits, for the Lincoln V building» • d j/ m-b&k.1.?,A • • • • • • • te, 11101111 JANUARY 18, 1990 aii/Allot 4 ,4111, „ CITYOF TIOARD OREGON ' ANN CRESWELL Assistant Project Director Trammell Crow Company 12060 SW Greenburg Road tigard, OR. 97223 0 RE: FOLLOWUP TO PROBLEM AT LINEMEN V PROJECT SITE Mrs Creswell, You were most helpful, in the above matter, and I want to thank you for all your information. I realize this activity is not condoned by your organization and I appreciated your candor when we spoke in your office. I am also sending this to up date you on what had transpired With Baugh Con- struction. Yesterday I mailed BRAD NYDAHL, Vice President of Baugh Construction, three Summons & Complaints for the incidents in NOVEMBER 1989, DECEMBER 1989 and JANUARY 1990. These are scheduled for appearance FEBRUARY 13, 1990 at 2:30pm at City Hall in Tigard unless they chose to pay the fines. Ross island Sand & Gravel, Carlson Testing and Western Concrete Pumping will receive warning letters. They will be cited if another incident, like this past one, occurs with Baugh or any other company; 7:00am means 7:00am. This letter is also a notice to you of the folloWing. If there are further violations of conditions of approval, Trammell Crow is to be held accountable as well. Should this happen, the conditions of approval will be suspended, the job Site shut down and a SumMons & Complaint is to isaued for the violation(s). '.Xt is my sincerest hope thee measures never have to be implemented. I feel, with everyones cooperation, thisi project will be brought to a SuccesSful Con- clUOion with everyone benefiting. If you need further information on thiS, or any other matter, please contact me anytime. My hours are from 7:00am to 4:00pm Monday through Friday. sincerely, /69 COY • HUMPHREY Enforcement Officer C: Ken Fox, City Attorney Keith Liden, senior Planner Brad Roatt, Building Official 13125 SW Hall 81vd,„PO 13c*23397,11gard,Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 . • JANUARY 19, 1990 /0//010,‘A CITY OF TIGARD WALTER CROW, Jr., Registered Agent Western Concrete, Inc. OREGON 707 SW Washington Suite #300 Portland, O . 97205 RE: VIOLATIONS AT CONSTRUCTION SITE I am sending this to advise you of a problem that occurred on a project site in ! Tigard. Employees of your comliany were on the site. I want to inform you of this in case you are unaware of tile violations involved. ''. On JANUARY 11, 1990 at 3:30am an extensive concrete pour occurred at the Lincoln V site on SW Greenburg Road. The developer is Trammell Crow and the contractor is Baugh Construction. The problemS are as follows...1) Conditions of approval were accepted prior to any construction by the developer and contractor. One of the conditions stated no work was to hegin prior to 7:00am and after •9:00pm unless authorized by the 1 City, and. .2) Section #7.40.170 of the Nuisance Ordinance states in essence no noise is allowed at construction sites prior to 7:00am and after 9:00pm without • prior permission from the City. Each of the above are Class 1 Infraction violations and carry fines of $250 per charge, per day, if found guilty in a Civil Infractions Hearing. The contractor and developer have been contacted and measures taken in their • instance. This notice is advising your organization of these violations and how they could affect you in the flutare. The City of Tigard would appreciate your cooperation in the following way. If you are contracted for a job prior to the allowed Starting time, please advise the contracting company of these requirements. Anyone on the site, when these problems occur, will be held accountable. am sending similar notices to all companies involved in the JANUARY 11th incident and asking them to assist in eliminating future problems. • If you need further input in this or other matters, please contact me. 4y % hours are 7:00am to 4:00pm Monday through Friday. The phone number is 639- 4171. • Thank you for your Attention to thid matter, alre'4,1141 le Enforcement Offic • c: Brad Roast, Building Official Keith Liden, Senior Planner 1 31 25 SW Noll Blvd.,PO Or Box 23397,Tigard,Oregoh 97223 (503)639-4171 .,,,.t..,.. M....,.� ,' •.,.,.....,...e,,_,4.._.,. ..,.._...,.,,. ..,..._.+,.,. »....,__.I._.«i...i;m,,......,,... •._.._ «,....«,»..,., _w_ ...., •'i«.,...__....•.,,..,,..,;»..I,kK, w.....F ,,...._..._..,,_....,„.,,.,,,,.;ra..l._..,.M^,.. .... .,.+...,`,,.w.a:.:'...,.x>.r mrr....,..,...,+r...ir..,,,i.._...M.....r..,„ .,,w...wF..::,.F::....• FI'1 •• • lip • N p M E M O R A N D U M >r ��; F` s ,r' • C I T Y O F T I G A R D DATE: JANUARY 16. 1990 Page _] of ge8 TO: KEITH LIDEN, Senior. Planner For Your Info Only FROM: COY R. HUMPHOEY, 'Code Enforcement Officer X Please'Reply SUBJECT: ILLEGAL CONCRETE POUR BY BAUGH CONSTRUCTION__LLincoln V Tower),) SUMMARY: On. January 11, 1990, at 3:54am, Baugh Construction conducted a o r Crete pour in violation of conditions of approval granted prior to construction. MENTIONED ILA NEWMAN, reporting party; lives at 9335 SW Locus (across from project), • home #244-2117 & work #256,-2070: OFFICER FISCHER, Tigard, Police Department; works graveyard shift; officer who responded to site of pour and submitted a Special Report (Case #90-0145). HARRY EILERS, Project Supervisor for Baugh at site of pour; 246-3634 (on site work number). ANN CRESW'ELL, Assistant Project Director (Trammell Crow Co.); ' doveloper of project; 245-9400 (work number at main office Trammell Crow). TIM .STULC, Project Manager (Baugh Construction); 641-✓2500 (main office in. • Beaverton) . BRAD g Construction; (main office in NYDAHL, Vice President of Baugh Construction 641-2500 „ Beaverton) ; ACTIDN .TAKEN I took ra copy Officer . • 's report to the construction site and got ' cb of Officer �IsCF�E ANN �r r her office, in the Trammel:) Mr EILERS' statement. I contacted CHESWELL at he Crow offides. I Spoke with TIM STULC, by phone, f Mrs CRESWFLL's office. .t Crow ne, � YFom M � a. Spoke with BRAD NYDAHL, by phone, the next day. i, dy contacted KEITH LIDEN, Sr. Planner, and BRAD ROAST, Building n Of' " � ne .� ficial:,' • i► 4 .. ...r..w,.., ,,. .„i,. ,,.. ,. ...M ,._ _.......«.._..,_..,_J.„..-..1..a...,i._,«.,.......,.._.CMG._. :LH.__ .,.u.,..l__.,.,.......,.w.—+..c...__a- .............»..__....,»..........,.«. .. ....._.............»....,......._.......4».....a.i..+...,........,a..,m..._....- u..;..,.-.x.-...............,»,,.._..,.......-„ :,...,..»._ t.. Page 2 of 4 pages Baugh Construction continued. .. • STATEMENTS: • ILA NEWMAN, reporting party, said she was awakened at 3:30am on. JANUARY 11, € 1990 by vehicles sitting in front of her home. She said the noise from the engines, people talking loudly, radios playing in the vehicles and noise from the construction site echoed throughout her house. She said she was most concerned for her 86 year old mother staying with her. The mother has had 1 ' three strokes and needs rest and quite. Mrs KEWMAN said she thought this was too much and phoned the police. She s,, said this was the third time this had occurred and it was not going to be ignored any longer. U Mrs NEWMAN said the first time was in NOVEMBER of 1989,. She called Trammell Crow and Spoke to ANN CRESWELL. Mrs CRESWELL assured her this was not allowed and everyone concerned with the project knew it. She assured MRS NEWMAN this would not happen again. MRS NEWMAN said the second pour occurred on DECEMBER 21,__12p9. She was at work on the day prior when Mr EILERS knocked at her home door. She Said he " told her mother that the pour, at 4:00am the following morning, could not be avoided. Scheduling of the workers and the concrete could not be halted. She said they did pour the following morning. She did not report it because she thought when Mr EILERS notified them this was all that was required. HARRY EILERS, Construction Supervisor on the site, Said he had to make the pour. The schedulin g of pumpers, concrete testers,rs� the gravel company " and the support p eo p le was not easy to acco p z si. ESecial when the end of the project was near and a far a area had to be completed. He s aid he took full responsibility for the pour. He knew it Was against the conditions of approval agreed to in the beginning: Mr EILERS said the dollar amount the roject stood to lose, by being behind, p � was great and he thought the risk was worth it. He Said, when the concrete Was poured prior to 1:00am, it had time to set up properly without waiting until late in the evening and holding crews over to finish. s boss, after the firs' i rs a... B �themould, not rbel repeated.to He thought, by contacting the neighbors and warning rn this he. cou " g p . . .. . Could again, could do it again without problems. He felt, it had worked, and Page 3 of 4 pages 2 Baugh Constr ;ion continued He said he got busy on the day before this pour and forgot to make the contacts. He said he took full responsibility for the pour and wanted to make it clear he was the only one who gave the OK. Mr EILERS said he felt that one more early morning pour, at the least, was Y needed to complete the project dealing with concrete. ANN CRESWELL, Trammel Crow Assistant Project Director, said she was unaware of this pour. She knew about the first one only. The second ons was as much a surprise as this one, She was not surprised that HARRY EILERS had taken it on himself to do such a thing again after being told by his bosses it was not acceptable. Mrs CRESWELL felt the only thing that would get his attention wa0 to issue a citation with a heavy fine attached. She felt this type of action was the way A • to get him to follow the rules. She knew he was aware of the requirements • prior to the first time and he willingly chose to disregard them. Mrs CRESWELL said it was her feeling this type of action was not Condoned by • BAUGH Construction. However, HARRY EILERS got results and was able to meet deadlines. She would not give an opinion as to whether this was condoned, under the table, by the management of BAUGH. • TIM STULc, Project Manager for BAUGH CONSTRUCTION, Said he was unaWare of the latest pour, or the second one in DECEMAER. He said his conversation with Mr EILERS in NOVEMBER was clear. Mr EILERS was not to pour, in this way again, as this was a direct violation of the conditions agreed upon before the project began. Mr STULC Said he would make sure this did not happen again. He assured me BAUGH CONSTAUCTION did not willing violate approved conditions. He said his • company stood behind Mr EILERS in whatever he did and were ready to take whatever repercussions may arise out of these incidents, BRAD NYDAH4, Vice Prebident of Baugh Construction, told me this incident wilts •I not condoned by his company. He Said he was of the impresbion the pout had • taken place around 6:00aM instead of beginning at or near 3:30a m. He Said it • was a problem anytime prior to 7:00am and he was aware of it. Mr NYDAHL said this problem Was not going to be repeated. . I ' • • • • ' (7.4 A • Page 4 of 4 pages Baugh Construction continued.. . If it is, he told Mr EILERS, prior to my call, his final pay check would be made out that same day. Mr NYDAHL said this type of disregard for rules agreed upon will not be condoned. He assured me Baugh Construction has no intentions ' of making this an acceptable practice. Not now, or any time in the future. I Mr NYDAHL said his company stands behind Mr EILER$ 100%. If there are to be repercussions from these problem , he is ready to accept what is necessary to put this behind them and continue with the project. Mr NYDAHL assured me Trammell Crow had nothing to do with any of the illegal pours and wanted to make sure they were not implicated in any way. He Said his employee caused all the unfortunate incidents and no other organization was to be held accountable. ACTIONS RECOMMENDED: I feel the three incidents can not be ignored as all parties involved knew of the existing conditions. These conditions included language saying no work was to begin prior to 7:00am without approval from the City. Isssonjmenditeic11 .1.ngt: 1. BAUGH CZNSTRUCTION should be sent a Summons & Complaint, in care of BRAD arDAHL, for three, violations of existing conditions; each to be treated as a separate Class 1 Infraction incident. • 2. Any companies involved in this incident be sent a warning letter to not violate the 7:00am staring time in Tigard again. a.) CarlOon Testing b.) Ross Island Sand & Gravel Co. c. ) Western Concrete PuMping 3. Notice be given to Baugh Construction that, if wielations of any cOnditionS occur again, they will be cited. Also, other violations could result in the condition of approval being revoked or suspended I , Until the problems are resolved to the City s satisfaction. 4. Trammell CroW should be notified of their being sUbjedt to a Summons & Complaint if any Conditions of approval are violated again. , - 4 p 40 , „:..%Ir.^_,4, .' «.........,-..,«:;,.iM,•:, ;._.:..l..i-...::,. ,.,....::5,.,.4. ,,.. .,+..,.1......w—.:.i.. ...,,.a.ii---.' ..«..t:..-+;,........•.,..�.....:w,'.ir,+.....r..,.,'..:w,.......l..r..,;.--,.,._.....:....::.. ..::.:.....,..A,.,t..,lr..au.a.»-«r...,...,.,«,w:..,.,,..-r..........„ • �rlw�w• I,�w January r8 0 1990 /iii ! ,r David Blake, Partner CITYOF •TIG 1 RD • Trammell Crow Company 10260 S.W.' Greenburg Road OREGON Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Conditions of approval - Lincoln V' File No. SDR 89-12 Dear David: I have reviewed the status of the conditions of approval, pertaining to the , development of Lincoln V with Ed Murphy and Randy Wooley. Before permits to complete the building and the tenant improvements may be released, three items remain to be completed: • 1. An agreement relating to the drainage system must be finalized. This agreement was, a condition of forming the LID and the attorneys are working to resolve this. Ed Murphy should be contacted if you have any questions regarding this item. 2. The Mapleleaf intersection issues must be resolved as noted in conditions 6. and 7'. in the decision. A copy of SDR 89-12 is attached. These conditions can potentially be covered by the LID if the County concurs with the ATEP report recom endatione. 3. A waiver of remonstrance must be provided (condition o 17.) . A copy of this agreement form is attached. All other con„.3 itions of approval have either been satisfied or will be secured by the formation of the 'LID,' Please call if I can be of any further assistance. • Sind rely, Keith S. Liden Senior Planner ' oz Ed Murphy h P y Randy Wooley � r Brad Roast 0 JiM Jaqua LINCV/kl r , , r 1315 SW N 'ii�IIglvi.,P.O P.( ,Box g gdrd 97223 71 a 4.1 . • • N. , x /0 ♦' I,»v..,-.,.In..1.�a...:,...-w,k',1.-,+n...-.I,rxw..e..,.w»»•� ,e nxL....,+».!.M.M.....r-.r. ,— Iw,..,,.«..v,.n.«.:.n......la,..r,w-... w-: ..u..v...nn'..ri.-tiw..,1 .,.,Nii.w..«..,...x«r..-....a I +....,vt...1»+ n.,w-n.,vn yk-..+M.,1 m,)s::n...l-I., mrx4 .++. .. .. Ik 4. , �' �t it-M• rl� -,;• A .. tRS� - o r Tra ' ellCrow: ompa y I r la., '' r-., i 0,.,,, 4 xr'.rr•r...,: ,,x-..h,t^^,, r r3 ,:, r, -r+.f, Ar.: r,,k ey 1. k „t, a•! t,;,,,...,:t:,,"'„,,:*,,- ,.r rcr.•�+•s,.,..,f..r• •f�� ^;7fl'`t'f1,..g♦.^, i�r'K•�!t?{t:' ,vigil.'�•}''b1f��u�`.'�r�rnt i^u p!nf.+�.�!Kr �:"�1��il. t,"1�:7�'ti.i«'�5w1, r z.t.T�e, e ,../ . , I iIF ...., t 1,.,wt,j 1, t..n ,.. ,r., .,�a,... I rd,e. t":.�r kll.l��vry*�iil,�,,da,�:. .k'�a.� ,:{c-,. h✓v,�.r A..,l,.,r. 7t.��.h.,. .rv,,.r. � •� ..� 6 ,.� ern"�.. t, �> 4 •n�.-43� n��TF I� i3, 5 Post Office Box 5396 10260 SW'Gteenborg Road 0 Iilil� Portland;Oregon 97228 Portland, Oregon 97223 503/245-9400 . NOV 0 9 198 November 8, 1989. • Mr a Keith hided . City of Tigard •'a 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Lincoln �CenterPha Phase V • • • Dear Keith: Please find enclosed the 'revised landscaping plan for the above . referenced project. This is to satisfy one of the requirements for . permits. An irrigation plan was also specified for the ' It is our plan to have the irrigation system design requirement p irrigation y g . built. We will forward; a copy to you upon completion if you need it for your files. Thanks for all your help, Keith. Don't hesitate to contact me should you have any. questions Sincerely, T� MME LL CROW COMPANY . • . / e,,,4 ,i.,e,(..)__ez..._,., ,,,...,:(/,/,::? Ann P. Creswell l k ° Assistant Project Di,reotor 14 I Enclosure , A s • I I , A .,:aid' , 11 . ∎ a n IF • r • • • ....�...,wr .. _...,.,._, no- l.. .. n....... .. ...... ,.- ... ., r ! ,. .--. ..._..,,nl L n..l�.m • p�'�qpyy�4 r�QpMp WA5IHIIIfNJTJ JUN 198 •r) JSOVJA E. 9585 S.W.Washingtc and, ° Mailing Address:P.0 iz \Orr' • (503)639-8860 (wqIUk June 7, 1989 Aso o4 11014E411oz, , r y ivtt CIA 1214 Mr. Ed Murphy m 't Community Deve a en C i 1 Director cf ommun Air Tigard Planning Da artmen t • P. 0. Box 23397 � " Tigard, Oregon 97223 ►5. ?'G (46d \ • Dear Ed.° I am in receipt of a copy of a letter addressed to you from Brent Curtis, Planning Manager and Land Development Manager for Washington County, regarding traffic impacts of the proposed development of Lincoln Center 5. T would • just like to add that we, toot, are concerned that continued large-scale development at Lincoln Center will exacerbate an already difficult traffic flow situation along Greenburg Road. As you know, we are presently in the process of having a major traffic study conducted by Kittelson & Assoc. , the purpose of which is to identify and suggest mitigation for traffic problems related to future expansion of Washington Square and surrounding development such as that which is occurring at Lincoln Center. We are presently reviewing the draft of the study. We should have a final copy` within the, next few weeks. As promised, I will • be in touch with you regarding the study. ,: . I'm m pleased t o h ea r Washington ton Co rt y ,ttands ready to meet with representatives of the City of Tigard, Oregoal Department of Transportation, Crow and Washington Square; to discuss mitigation ation of impacts prior Trammel 's `g � p to granting approval of Lincoln Center 5. We feel the Trammel Crow Lincoln Center development ' which has taken place over the last few years has • substantially impacted the traffic problem we presently have on Greenberg e prudent erg mitigate traffic impacts and F� L re development in work together to Road. It would seem the area. We would be happy to attend of. recent at1 ,I u p py • a meeting of the parties suggested by Mr. Cu rtis, � � � , .. ' _ L _ .«. u..,.u...uw...«.....y4a .....+. ..,_..m......r.J..,..x.,.m...«......i..+1-1 r..4 r. .w l...0........r.........«....... .. r.-.,... ...ry-n. 0.1 I JAN � 8 198 �� 1TaWA$IHHffNJT Cerinuuriltyikttiltidii SOUArat 9585 S.W.Washington Square Rd. • Portland,Oregon 97223 Mailing Address;P.O.Box 23635 • Tigard,Oregon 97223-0095 (503)839.8860 June 7, 1989 Mr. EdMurphy Mr Director of Community Development Tigard Planning Department P. O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Ed: I am in receipt of� a copy of �'a ��letter addressed to� you from Brent. Curtis, a .r Planning Manager and Land Development Manager for. Washington County, regarding ' traffic impacts of the proposed, development of Lincoln` Center 5. I would just like to add that we, too, are concerned that continued large-scale development at Lincoln Center will exacerbate an already difficult traffic, flow situation along Greenburg Road. As yoU know, we are presently in the process of having a major traffic' study conducted by Kittelson & Assoc. , the purpose of which is to identify and suggest mitigation, for traffic problems related to future expansion of Square and surrounding development, as which .is occurring Washington S uare an such a that at Lincoln Center. , We are presently reviewing the draft of the study. We should have a final copy within the next few weeks. As promised, I will be in touch with you regarding the study. I'm pleased to hear Washington County stands ready to meet with representatives of„ the City of Tigard, Oregon Department of Transportation, Trammel Crow and Washington Square to ,discuss mitigation of impacts pritw to granting approval of Lincoln Center 5. We feel the Trammel Cro w Lincoln Center development w h ich has ta ken place over th._e last s t few years has substantially impacted d the traffic problem we presently have on Green b r g Road. It would se em prudent to I Work together to mitigate traffic impacts of recent and future development in the area. We would be happy to attend a meeting of the parties suggested by Mr. Curtis. • l I I '.. ...._,_...._._........�.._�. _�......_,.�. .".„...�,.........,,...,,_M� �...4.w4.. ..w.. �...y11.....,W,._"....,�..w., �. w.la,. .� �_ Jf��.�.>:.�w.�._.w.�'I<�;�,..,...�,,..:ww..; W.� �1 ...�,�..._... u Page 2 Mr. Ed Murphy June 7, 1989 If you have any further questions, please don't hesitate to call . ,4doieo, Sincerely, -ack F. Reardon, CSM/CMD Vice President and General Manager JFR•crw cc: Ron Roberts Tom Sroufe Dick Eichler Brent Curtis Daniel Boyden, Trammel Crow Don Adams, ODO'f 1,, I I • 1 , • I G' I a I 4 I, 00, 4 ,. _.,......,:,u:.-,,,.T ,:,..tc....,_.........,,..,.-.,4._.-_,.:...A-.....,.,1....:,r__.L,....,_.:..;-,.,.—.....,..,+,.._..,-.,.,.w-,..a..g.,..,,...,..4 , ..LA-..,..W., r,m.....,,lt..-..,,.,w„-..1s.,;.. .......r-o- r-,,4,.., ..4,»..,,-r a .,.,:A-,„r..w...,........«..A.,,,,...:,a i.....ak«.r.,,,,-,c., :.,.t s.r,.L 4..'ii,,:,,»..-„..,„.o.-.....,.. ....- r n .• . ri, , il(-4 " '{Cronpany r ifr.37•-7.o`2.�•C"AA",...w..�bl..,�,...!".--4,,.t.iR+•7,'x".Y,Y b.,.. •>n�.'h - ...,,,:'f�C '�.a...,r�.,.0 H^„..17:..F+^?V^^m t,t ,-'..:.,..”w 7,:wnfi.:x-‘d...ii-i.r, .'r.�'�" ty t.U• r.r4f r n r....,n'4 i�a:.,..-. ykkr b,•4 f u " ,Fs,1,,P4,,v,,irr..,v n:-T-R1,',,.n. �77 .ew . . t,nr S 14,41„- >iIi$” Post Office Box 5396 10260 SW°Greenburg Road Jane 21, 1989 8 9 Portland, Oregon 97228 Portland, Oregon 97223 503/245-9400 Ms. Deborah Stuart Planner City of Tigard Dear Ms. Stuart; Per your request, the following is a description of where the construction vehicles will park and where we will store materials From July 1 r- November 1, all parking and materials will be contained on the area currently occupied by the six houses. From November 1 -- February 1 (completion) , all parking and • materials will be isolated to the land we purchased from the school . If you have any questions, please donQt hesitate to call. M Sincerely, TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY �y I - David Blake pa 't I r rier I w } M ,s A 1"''''''''r h ,M 3 l 4 i / / 1 . � d r � I � t I t ..0...17°P(....t '1"" "1—"14 -•,- ^ ,....„_...,y , evI- I I , w 4 • i bt. S t • i I ;.:»..:..,,..,....,,..z.«:,:,'..,.. ...u,..»J:i;+.,«1,.,..x+-f,M:.;.:.,.w;.._ _ ,_..1,..,,.•.,.,. .»w...,....,:,M....w,..»..,..,w.......:.:r...,...t•«a„1,+:.+...u.....,,4..:...,e...«. »--•+«.•,..aaK...»..«.'..•a,....,w....,,,..._,: ,a...,+i..:ac., � w M wu. ...,.,._„ }''�'� X11 _ D�� x ,TTY .` OLi 'G: C NDI IO SHALL BE sr t,FLED e 4 THE CONSTRUCTION 21. No construction shall be allowed to take place between the hours of 9:00 p.m. d.^.d 7:00 a.m. 22. All construction materials shall be. stored on-site. 23. The applicant shall ensure that off-street parking be provided for all construction-related vehicles and trailers. 24. The applicant shall ensure that flagmen be provided when construction vehicles are blocking public streets. 25. During construction of the, site improvements, the construction traffic shall access the area from Greenburg Road only. All vehicles and construction--related equipment shall be parked on the site. No vehicles shall he allowed to park on SW Oak, SW Locust Streets. or SW 93rd Avenue which are related to the construction of the subject improvements including employees, subcontractors, material deliveries, etc, NOTICE OF DECISION - TRAMMEL`CROW CO (GDR 89-12/V 89-17/M 89-11) PAGE 16 I I . I I I I , I I' i I ' x • • • -...•,.., �...�....,,r-.,u.r i...rGn4.....,.:,,,...1,..r-o w..rr.M.w-,�d:+.�..,.o- ..G.A::w.. .n.r.�' .«...:,.I�.•Ilw,r r...i.-.:i.r..i..«ti.,,�.t ...,t...e..n.iw,.uY..i.Ai.,n;.i1....r:....,k,-.:.;� p '...uL.,. «....w..r,.r�m r,•....�.,;w.r--4.:...---hha:.w.,i..w.;.....t •5, r,.....:.2•.a..,w.,,,a.J:..,�.,.......«....v.,ukr..,..u.wn, ...r:,-.F»-...:. •�...w..w...�4.,:..4:;:.....r.., t� .. 1, I , 5y 1 H rVr an, We C Cornpany ; • 3':"•'..nM�r-,. .f....i.....:«...:..,r« .n.+.y� -...�•rn.u�M•-.ih+.'i.n A-..+.n .. � k�. ,.. • .. � � - � - ' ` ...,y.„y.�.. .�.. -.-per• .n fr...w�.� ....... ,nK. . .� • .,.•... h!' .. Post Office Box 5396 10260 SW Greenburg Road June 21, 1989 Portland,Oregon 97228 Portland, Oregon 97223 503/245-9400 Ms. Deborah Stuart rr` Planner City of Tigard Dear Ms. Stuart: • Per your request, the following is a description of where the construction vehicles will park and where we will store materials. From July 1 - November 1, all parking and materials will be contained on the area currently occupied by the six houses. r ' From November 1 - February 1 (completion) , all parking and • materials Wile be isolated to the land We purchased from the school. If you have ahy questions, please don't hesitate to call. Sincerely, • TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY • • David • Blake • • • Partner r • . ..._.. . �iyA♦i e :. `� � Y ..., '. NW, I/4 NE fi t: SECTION ► WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON SCALE H , : / • SEE MAP E i� 1 �6DG • , .iii r I..� i a �;,.8. z5 i�J/lr`' '.F..%ir�///�/t�� Il////I%/'r�r/✓//I//l//!1////l////1J//////%//1///1i%/////////////////%i., M ,� rid/i/ri/./.,, i.e,v,,,l•',,r/./rill.///irdiiiiir./,/,,,,r... { 50 50. ft"..50 50 x000 SJ 50 50 50 5F-1-3 I 31N. CR.T53 „.. ' S0 50 .23 AC.50 , 406.50 1002 1 1 000 I I 2 90 AC. !' 0 1 °1 1? 4 3 I 1 L 4 4132 AC. 4 of l°, 4 3 2. ' t3 ten.' 1 2 1 I t o 1' 900_1_ IW �I 4 -�- .53AC. x'01 � '. a e r• OD b 6 11 0 t.. in aii,(' S:, O i y N �OrG �Q.war .�Ih .�f-. ."8.. Q"" I - 't .. �.sa �. 1 1 ` 1 z-`�1 ,2:.#AC 1. 5o I I y� 81 1 g 10 4 .g '7 g1 9 19 7 8 g 10 ti (� I So j,.. so 50 ..=b- po, 'i , 5n 50 a0 +� •. !00.044 T ,r, ,. 11/0 7 s 'a.".Vli» . , ...c, vAcATEb Sp 50 !�°"' 50 0 �; 0 r __ `� 50 r lie` 50 50 0 b 31 Et'1. •. y7 X4.$6 °A6 1 0 eih� ao O O $;;Y,'Iy. � r ... 4. 2,50 Ac. . > _ _ laa , 12. A 1 2 5 12 '::: li i 21 to m.., 149.88 iri � s.s �r IV d 30�Si i E s 1 I ao w•.' i 2 6. 11 41 iDOitt� I 11 ill le.,a ham-•. 165E 1 to `: 4-. 1 j .pp. a � tee. 7 10 .1 , X4 1 r6 1p ,n It. ai* 3400 , a t" += ...: 43. CAc. T 1 , 8, sox., O �93 , . S 1 •:.,• 6�+ r 100 100 t t 84.66 [I`it� 1 5 25 I .r„_ '-+ 2305 ' . Jar,.n.....,M,.... ..•. ,.>....Ir ..HM ..< .�.....n. .�. �,..,o a,......x,...,r. • M1 t ..w�u,�u�u...+�..aux_.;.,.a.... S R�I 'N W M. IS i, 3bAb 1 .2 ae�. ON r ° . T4,aw .e dam. , "" CANCELLED TAx LOTS ., ' . , ye,.%'' $ �mwnrc� '" " u k;. �? " S 4201,X204,2Q0,1001,1100, 1200,1300,1301,1400,1500; , a r' 1ttiO O,2IO,18G0,1900,2000, 2090,21 V0,2300,2301,2302, 2303,2400,2500,260Q,L7OO, 270(,3700,3800,380 t,3900, 4000,4IO0,4200,4300,430 t, �� �„ ��'� �" 2200 2900 31200 310Q 201 DAIXF` � `. r 300,30i,800,801',901,i0o5, 3305,3402,3404,3500,3301,, 3600, r r , .ii j . N, 1 �:% • r i ii✓ ii ✓i /i��ii i/�iJiir��,ii,/ ;,ji riiii/r��✓,.iiiii,J,i✓r✓i✓.,r�✓i✓ii�i ,,,, it.,,,,,,./ /i/� ii/ia,/,.. i✓i ✓ /x" � '1/✓ /iii/✓�ii 1✓ � i ri✓ .✓ j 1 s . n (G.R. 753.50` WIDTH) #;, , 50' 5.76,,,,', ,. '' i ,Mk`le so' 50 50 50 0 "-r--50.-1--117.7* 50 50 ..;iO �60�" 700 500 W 400 ' 202 2031 1 204 ; 100 ill »22 AC .24 AC. .,�^-3.�1 ': �i' �iBACti D... .i9AC ..35AC� 7 17C. f,,2 4 3 +? 2 co 0 a a' ; . , S) 18 3 2 I, o I 0 W . O 1n 5, , `..i6 AC'°'<"iin -- .r "' •50 50 I .-- 4 A la tie- • 50 , , 1000 a 50 c• " ,' 0I�,4?: 12 ' `°O 5 12' ��� t° po 5 5 12 ,ce."` ,:" a too . ; C, , (62.50) 37.50_413a,..,(i9), 50 • fi; 1170' 0 Li__o_ N .i)....., z. 702 �ioo 't•w 1. ° •: I, .,,! .23 AC, .34'AC o ' ' R 9 7 8 2 9 10 a 2 7 8 " 9 10 21 f I� 7 �8 9 10 2 La tu 1 I ft stE tft.r . 11- (3504) 60 ,,5. , 5` ,�, � • 50 , 50 50 5Q so 50` S0 50 50 • IS,I 3,,�..s. - MAPLELEAr STREET 2 0 '-'5'0-- .56, :`i 5o s0 C C, .5Q 0 1- SO WIDTH)4 50 1 S0' 4 5 ? .-r -1=, : " 19 2800 2901 1 1 1 I 0 t ' , , a) ,M AC, .57AC.` ' 4 " 3 2 1 01 ; 104 5 2 I I I 4 3 2 1 o r� II . ( I I i,,u 25 r Ilsr 4?ET%CER ELEitk-NTAT✓ 100 ti 100 77. it�0 . 4*1 ,*•, tali 1SC L DiS7*RIC1°s o •�5 12 � �,i ,:,.; I�, 12� 2 6 H El sp aa12 8 11 21 •:,•,tl 6 11 J I I -4, MbN*1 + .4 rll,,,,›f— , + • • 4 'i 9 C 8 °I 1�° 8 9 �� a Ir, 8 9 , r , L to,,,0", , 100 5CS 1t._a M00 I 50 1 100 100 5Ct ,Y+ .�dl:R'Y/!/,!l✓.r,,,tYl✓!, �....�.1. tasJ,.r�'"/ l"/'+i,*,r rr/y.Y�r+..,:',"/i,yam / .rY /7„i,, ✓ r ,77J .i i,,„,.;r.4 , • �����,�fr '� x • • • A ...V • ‘ RECEIVED PLANNING Tigard City Council JUN 19 NO • We, the undersigned, strongly oppose the application by Trammell Crow or any other entity to change the existing traffic plan for Lincoln Street. Our opposition is based on the following arguments: 1. A Metzger-Progress traffic study was done in 1985 by Washington County with a traffic plan that considered the needs of the whole affected area not just the property owned by Trammell Crow. This study went through an observation phase, as well as a citizen „ review and input process. The conclusion of the study specifically singles out Lincoln Street as a major part of the traffic flow pattern needed for existing and future local area growth. Our opposition is: a. Trammell Crow's application to change Lincoln Street so that it would have an "around the block" configuration would have a major negative impact and negate the use off Lincoln Street as a solution to the current and future traffic needs on Oak Street. b. A summary changing of Lincoln without deference to previous studies and plans that considered the whole area's needs in its scope, and making such a change without sufficient restudy of its impact on the total area is not prudent government. if a change were to be considered, it should only be after additional study of comparative scope with its impact to the total neighborhood assessed., • C. The highest and best use for Tigard, its tax base, .nd the neighborhood is not to displace densely develog?,djesidential housing if Oak, but to first consider the sparsely developed area icist d Oak Street. Not only is this area more undeveloped, but it is more suitable to commercial development due to its proximity to Highway • 217, which is concurrently less desirable for housing„ Changing Lincoln so that it is no longer a straight street will have a severely negative impact on the neighborhood. d. Changing Linclon would set a bad precedent for the citizen process of government since it would change previous citizen planning, e. The decision on Lincoln Street should be based on its impact on the whole community and should not be teMpered or distracted by issues related to the future of the school. f. Giving up street properly to Trammell Crow for their Use, and in exchange getting • improvements on only0% of the remaining adjacent streets is irrespbbsible, If street footage is to be given up, the developer should be responsible for 100% improvements • of the adjacent street that is being designed for their own use. , . , , :*': . . ,' VIIIPINENOMPIIIIIIImummimill141.111maiumummum . .. .„ . . . , . . . , . „ . . I r., „:.,: ! , . , • . , , . • i • . , , . . , . SIGNED ADDRESS DATE . " ,. . ''' --/gtadNdio71 935o 67A-1 b14-k: 5r 7zel; 15-7- / 17 , ' i,' . ', •.. 4 . '14..:.i- /./Y"- ---. . ' ; 1 • .S . • ., ,.. 190 .--.c34) 04CS( .5 /7/.;152fr' /S.- / .. 8r , 1 r .. . . . yo ob Sed -7 I/ f S . ' ' o/' ' eo - 1,0 oll. v. . .)---///.5-/,,,ree.• , . „ 1 . cs ? 00 ‘,76,..) [,. . . . , 35 .5(af' '?( . ; • • 51 / -. / - - -' Ret,ct - / ,,, 1/'-f”" / / 6//s/ge , . , , • • . ç .. 4 , . , ,.. I, . . iii 3.1 , cr 9 5 5 14/. (7-tk ,... ., ' . 24? , ‘..c. P 93 5- Si 6) ' 6 0,1Q) 914 6// 7P? : 1 1 . • L-,- ---/45--,/,47+ . 5 5 .e-6 • ' 1 s ' 0 ,i.: 4, : -44' 4Ali „ I , . • . . , • , . -' . , S' LS VII ("i''' ' 1 .. I .'' df ' . 7'2ero , . . . , . „ . ,. . , , . ,AQIC .,:;.+.�,-.JU,.�.:%.a.....t..a.�:,:.+L.''.�.,,il,_:,,..-...(hl+�•a.,.+.a.L,.a V r...4,,..,....,�.....,+,i,.+_........n••. ...,a...J,".�.u..L.«.�.«. ..,...,_.,«�..+ :w ,�..w�.,,i•.a..,.,.4..,+:'«.....-..,-w,.h`.:...,«.'..a:_.�..�.i.:�........�....�H�l..:u,:1!a.�...,.+ ., .1,»r,.,. - .,...,s:.-a.:....�x..-,......w_.w ,,.v.ut_.-T.:..9...w«rr!:.a..•r-.;a,Mu;_,.ia�X1..H,,.w.u1,''�-.,...«,,w.U:..,....,,' MEMORANDUM City of Tigard, Oregon TO: Jerree Hrdina, Building Bonnie. Mulhearn, Planning Phyllis Harris, Finance/Accounting FROM: Laura Freeman, Engineering Technician DATE: June 19, 1989 RE: WCTM /S1 35AB, TL 900 1002 SDR 89-12, V 89-17, M 89-11 Lincoln V Tower An address for the above listed building n g I h s been assigned by this office. This address is as follows • I I II Lincoln , 10200 Sw Greenburg Rd Tigard, OR 97223 • 'I I I I I • I • I I I ' I I .I I , I R I r • I II it 1111 I i i , i ».a,.7+.' µ.Mr.»i.u,t:.' ;...;.4,...,`. .. .-............»..,.,,,.,..„1.wwM...,k.:n+-.-kM4=.,.:,..,++.,.-7...a...,4.w.--......' .Y„«...-,.,«..:....#k�.-.-;.:rmr.-4t,..In.n.,,.aax a�`\14u..wu,.1,_-.,..;.✓-nw.�,�+.M«wFi.`«t4,,.....u.w,..»!fi,:,+..,-d,,.�+-...-L.t,a..,(..,,.: • TO: 1 dui d n i �. ivis�,on 1 . FROM: Keith. Liden, Senior Planner • RE: Grading or Site Work Permit for Lincoln Ctr. V DATE: 6/8/89 The recent decision approving Lincoln Center V (SDR 89-12), did not include any conditions regarding grading or site work permits. These permits may be obtained at any time provided the following issues are addressed: • 1. Sufficient parking spaces shall remain to Serve the existing Lincoln Center development. 2. Adequate access shall be provided for the buildings and parking spaces. ? 3. Landscaped area shall not be reduced below 15 . . 1 L No ��rork: through either the licensing agreement or vacation.authorized by the City within street right-of-way until � author a lic `n. agreement.. It is anticipated that Council'will approve a iioensing agreement on 6/12/89 followed by a vacation ,,`'.ater this summer. • , d J •• ' .y.... ...M«~.,.xrd,.a-k..:„.,ww,.....,...i....i_.w,..,..,-.:.r--...,...,«..wl-..,...,..,..t-;_...a...,.,.:ia.........5xi.......:,,,,.«.r...,.....,,,x......,,a«,....w:,,,..J.;iti...,.iw::..,...................,...,...,.MM..M..;,... ...,..a ti..r »...w_ ».......:;:n.+.•,...... ..as;.-l,-,».w..re..,,.«,.a.a:.,' »ice..-.::++....;.».«.iu:.+.:t.,..,..... .,,.�',sl.... r , The primary intent of the Code height and setback requirements is to provide adequate light and space between buildings, particularly when different zoning districts are involved. Though the building is taller • than allowed, the .. proposed setback will result in a lass imposing • building than a 45 foot tall, structure with a 20 foot setback wh i c h would meet Code standards, No ,adverse impacts resulting from the variance are anticipated' relating • to traffic impact. The building square footage is within Code requirements and the traffic generation will not exceed what would be expected from full development of this site. As noted in the . Engineerahg Division comments, several traffic related issues will need to be finalized prior to completion of this 'project. , Parking Space Dimension:' The above criteria have also been adequately addressed by the ' applicant, The reduction in compact space width from 8.5 to 8 feet is 'h minimal, The Washington County standard is` 7,5 feet and the present parking lot is developed with this standard, • • C. DECISION Based upon the discussion above, the Planning Director approves , C R w / 87-07 subject to the following conditions: 1, PRIOR TO ISSUANCE Or .i l_ WORK OR FOUNDATION„ PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL 931';: SATISFIED: a, The applicant shall demonstrate t hat t ►E existing t » ite and off—site storm drainage system is sized to carry the storm run-off, from a 10—year storm following full develop-vent and that the r � y additional run—off caused by their development' w ill cause no , significant impacts on downstream properties, b. The applicant must submit a revised site plan demonstrating that future relocation of the SW Locust Street and SW Oak Street accesses to SW Lincoln does not significantly impact the site. The revised site plan must be approved by the Pl.:Anning and. Engineering Sections, 2, PR:t067 TO ISSUANCE or UUILl3XNa CONSTRUCTION PEReaTSk THE FoL:LoWXNG CONDITIONS MUST 8E COMPLETED Ort ASSURED. ALL CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS NOTED BELOW MUST OE COMPLETED PRIOR TO 'ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS: R. The a. �licant shall demonstrate the on—site private storm applicant demonstrate , that drainage system will be operated and maintained by an enforceable maintenance agreement affecting benefiting properties. b> Standard H al ” st eeI a t rduere t5 including sidewalks curbs, streetlights, drive way aprons, storm drainage and utilities shall be installed along the SW Oak atreet frontage. Said improvements along SW' Oak street shall be built to City minor collector NOTICE: OF dtG xION sLk 07-08/V 07-0Y T� MMELL cRoW co, PAGE 6 i 4 tr • • standards and conform to the alignmeni- of existing adjacent improvements, The City will be issuing the necessary public • improvement permits for this requirement, • • C. Standard half—street improvements including sidewalks, curbs, streetlights, driveway aprons, storm drainage, and utilities shall be installed along the SW Locust Street frontage. I Said improvements shall be constructed to City major collector standards and conform to the alignment of existing adjacent improvements. The City will be issuing the necessary permits for these improvements. I ' d. ' Additional right—of—way shall be dedicated to the public along the SW Oak Street frontage to increase the right—of—way to 80 feet .— from centerline, the description for said dedication shall be tied to the existing right—of—way centerline as established by Washington County. the dedication document shall be u,,.A City forms and approved by the Engineering Section, Contact Jon teigion in ' Engineering for forms and further information, E . • Additional right—of—way shall be dedicated to the public along the entire SW Lincoln Street frontage to increase the right—of—way to 30 feet from centerline, The description for said dedication shall be tied to the existing right—of—way centerline, In ' addition, the applicant shall dedicate to the public a 60 foot ' wide strip, in direct alignment and extension of, 8W Lincoln Street across the entire north—south distance of tax lot 3300, map 181 85A0, The dedication shall be on City forms and approVed by the r.ngineering Section. Contact Jon FeiTion to obtain forms and further information, f The applicant shall provide at least three Westbouhd approach - lanes on Mapleleaf at Creenburg Road. The applicant shall ' construct modifications to the existing intersection and traffic • signal installation as required to accommodate the widened Mapleleaf approach at CreenbUrg Road, said improvements will • require the submittal of detailed construction drawings to the City and County for approval. • g, The applicant shall sign a waiver of remonstrance agreement to participate in a potential future local improvement district for the improvement of SW Lincoln Street. Included in the agreement will be the applicants assurance to relocate the 8W Locust Street ' and SW Oak Street accosse$ to SW Lincoln Street, Said agreement will be prepared by the City and recorded with Washington County once executed, h, Construction of proposed public improvements shall not comMence until after the Engineering Section has issued approved public improvement plans The applicant must post a 100 percent, performance assurance, the payment of a permit, and a sign installatioh/streetlight fee, Also, the execution of a street , opening PerMit or construction compliance agreement shall occur prior to, or concurrently with the issuance of approved public improVeMent plans, • NOT/CE OF DECISION — $DR 87-08/V 87-07 — T4AMMELL CROW CO, — PAGE 7 , • o • • .. ., 1 , p T., a I :i., Upon comOletion of .cursory review, seven '(1) sets of plan profile { public improvement construction plans and on (1) itemized construction cost, estimate, stamped by a Registered Professional A , . Civil Engineer, detailing all proposed public improvements shall be submitted to the Engineering Section For approval. Submit • improvement drawings and related data to John Hagman in 1 Engineering. t, 8. PRIOR OR 1"0 ISSUANCE QF" BUILDING PERMITS, "1 HE FOLt».C?W IVG CONDITIONS SHALL . . . " 1 s yr:tsN:1~,ED; )'` .• ' a. The applicant shall provide confirmation of the total dross floor area of the entire Lincoln Center complex, �. y ..... b. A revised site plan shall be submitted for Planning Director �r� approval which contains the following: (1) Parking sace` dimensions 'standard 9' x 18 , compact 8 x 15 C ) »J space C � ) AP PV (2) One handicapped space per 54 required spaces 12' x 18' P ' t... (3) 88 secure bicycle spaces distributed throughout the Lincoln Center complex (bike rack design must also he submitted for . appt"ouai) ; ., c+ r!t�. detailed landscaping �; plan shall be submitted d for Planning ' , Director approval which contains the following (1) identification of all plant materials ; II (2) Screening of parking� areas " (8) Justification for .removal of existing trees along the ea'rstertl �" . boundary of thr»_ project,, (4) Compliance with Chapter 18,100 an Section 18,120,180(a)(4) of�t the Co r mut ity Development Cody , 1. t ' 4. Landscaping Hater ia ls ,s ho wn on the appr ove d p pr (Condition 3.c. )) shall be installed prior to occupancy, 1 . 1�5, The conditions of approval for S ecx O. Use Permit (87-121 S1) and Comprehens .ve Plan Amendment ' and Zone Change (8/-78—M) shall be satisfied, . 6, This approval is valid if exercised 'within one year of the final . decision' ion date. noted below. NOTICE of bi Ctb:CON - 8bR 87--08/V 87-07 -- TRAMMELL CROW cO, -- PAGE 8 • • . , . �, � 1 � � � � � � � + �� '�' I • IBS ,�.--,..�.......,.., :.:k.-.,.........:,.,..i,....�.,...,..»,...�,..,,,,..a,. ,r.,�,«.. ...,._...,... _s.....,,...�».+..,.J..,..,,,.......,.W:..+,a.........................+,a...........,_..�,I..,..a.,�.,„...w-.;-.�...,.,,. '.i...a.,...1.....�..,»..,....t.,.u...:,+,.++,.».,., ......,..N.a,.,»«...,+»_7r,alr_,.w,.(,w.,,r,«.-,.1�.... .-.u-_w.«,i.r.w4_.,..,�..,.,i�..,.r..n.,� WASHINGTON COUNTY, ,. 4 „`e y t a OREGON srr0 a June 1 1989 RECEIVES . JUN 51989 w . ComhLnitY Devo,:opmcgt Mr. Ed Murphy Director of Community Development Tigard Planning Department P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: SDR 89-12 - LINCOLN CENTER 5 Washington County has reviewed the traffic impacts of this proposed development and submits the following comments: All affected intersections operate at, near, or over capacity F, shown below. Intersection LOS V/C Reserve Capacity Greenburg/Locust F .9 . Greenburg/S. 217 Ramp F 1.09 Greenburg/N. 217 Ramp E 0.94 Greenburg/Mapiele ►f E 0.94 Calculated stacking distances are just barely adequate or inadequate compared . to available distances as shown below. Stacking Stacking Distance Distance Intersection Movement Required Available Greenburg/Mapi el eaf NB LT 495 ft. 500 ft Greenburg/Mapleleaf WB LT 428 ft. 150 fta i reen burg /N. 217 Ramp SS T 4D 0 9 ft. 500 ft. As you can clean p Greenburg/Locust inters A clearly see, operations at the intersection are a safety concern, Level of service at this location is F signal serious safe s ' and sit warrant volumes are exceeded. Mitigation measures must be developed to f s as r elevate the level-of-service� er�viCe at� this intersection to ��Drd required by Washington my Resolution ��d Order 83-219. suggests County ion �an � � �... interconnection review �sur� that signalization in conjunction with signal "� nnection for progressed traffic flow along Greenburg Road should be investigaed • • bepertment of Land Use'And Transportation,Land Development Services Division 150 North First:AvenUe Hillsboro,Oregon 21124 Phone:5o /848 8761 � .. ,,.r.....,,,.a,..�.a;...w+;'.w,..;J.-..,.M..-.......,.,_..:..,.-.. .L.. ..»...-.,,.........m.w.,.aF...,.a» .,,.w. ...a.a. .... ....t.ti.' ,.,... '!.-.aL:. ,.....p....,..,.....,\vF_.r, .,.....,.W......,..m,..-. c ...•....._.,...«.,..+f,:»...w..w,...-.,.,t.;r...i:,.«a:, ,..-.:.1,-d.n,i....i....,.n+;i+,: i ' v *Page 2 - City of " Planning SDR 89-12 -• LINCOLN CLaTER 5 k June 1, 1989 Several previous phases of Lincoln Center were reviewed and approved by • Washington County. Through these reviews and also through the Metzger Circulation Study and recent Transportation Plan Update we have continued to review and observe the traffic circulation issues associated with Washington ;. Square and Lincoln Center. We are extremely corerned that continued large scale development at Lincoln Center will exacerbate an already difficult situation. AdOilionally, our concern regarding Lincoln Center Five and associated traffic impacts is heightened considerably by recent discussions of relocating Metzger School in order to facilitate continued easterly expansion of Lincoln Cent err by Trammel Crow. We strongly believe that an appropriate condition of approval would require mitigation of traffic impacts. Obviously, full mitigation of the traffic impacts as a condition of approval will have a major economic impact on the development project. Nonetheless, it is important to ensure that existing standards for nobility, traffic capacity, and traffic safety are maintained prior to sanctioning any further development. Washington County stands ready to meet with representatives of the City of (� 4. Tigard, Oregon 'Department of Transportation, Trammel Crow and perhaps adjacent property owners to discuss mitigation of impacts prior to granting approval of Lincoln Center Five. If you require additional information or clarification, please contact me at F' e t Curtis a P1:nning Manager and Land Development Manager c. Bruce Warner �. e Danial Boyden, Trammel Crow General � dack Reardon, C Washington Square Don Adams, ODOT edmurps[c #. I h , . T r /dd idt) 1'14, DeMed MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Deborah Stuart, Assistant Planner DATE: May 18, 1989 FROM: Gary Alfson, Trhnsportation Engineer SUBJECT: SDR 89-12 - Lincoln Center V Commente: The applicant proposes to construct a 7 story, 125,000 square foot, office building and a 2-story parking garage adjacent to the existing Lincoln Center Development site. The parking garage structure is proposed on property east of the site. This property was recently approved for a zone change for the 2- ' • story garage structure. The 7 story office building is proposed to be located • north of tile existing Lincoln 3 office building. The conditions of approval for previous applicationa on this Lincoln Center site included improvements to Mapleleaf Drive, Oak Street, and Locust Street. The improvements to Oak Street 0 • and Locust Street have been completed. The iMprovements to Mapleleaf Drive, involving revisions to the existing signal and providing three westbound approach lanes to Greenburg Road, have not been completed. Other conditions of improvements included relocating the existing accesses onto Oak and Locust Streets when Lincoln Avenue is improved. The driveways were required to be • relocated to avoid Olose spacing between the public street and the driveway. The applicant propopee to relocate Lindoln Avenue at LocuSt Street to the east to the intersection at 92nd Avenue. A traffic report has also been submitted • with this application evaluating the impact of this development onto the • (.:L_ adjacent street. Findings: 1. Access to the site will be from Locust Street, Lincoln Avenue (93rd Avenue) and Mapleleaf Drive. The submitted site plan for Lincoln Center v Shows four accesses onto Locust Street, puffs the Lincoln Avenue interseetion and the Mapleleaf Drive interSection to LOCUBt Street. Two accessIes are propoSed onto the relocated Lincoln Avenue and one access is proposed onto the extended Mapleleaf Drive. Locust Street is a major collector Street and will be improved in 1989 aa a result of previous developments and the Tigard Major Street Bond Projects. Its intersedtion with Greenburg Road 1.0 currently unsignalized. The • construction plans are Currently being designed for the Locudt Street improvements. The applicant Should coordinate the design of the two projectS so that construction Can 000ur without duplication of efforts. The applicant proposes to vacate the exidting right-of-way of Lincoln Avenue and relocate it to 02nd Avenue at LedUat Street. Lincoln Avenue is deBignated as a minor Collector street from Oak Street to Locust Street. The proposed realignMent of the right-Ot-Way of Lindoln Avenue 1.0 largely ftonexiStent the realigned right-of-Way Should be provided by tht applicant prior to the vacationof the ekisting right-of-,Way. 92nd Avenue at Locust Street had a 50 foot wide right-of- way. Minor collector streets require a 60-foot wide right-of-way and a . ) (// • 40 foot pave wi h plus sidewalks, streetlights, and associated underground tiliti s. Additional right-of-way will need to be dedicated al ng the existing 92nd Avenue to create the 60 foot wide right-of-way equir d for a minor collector street. Since Lincoln Avenue will only intersect Locust Street, it is our opinion that most of the traffic coming to and from the Site will utilize Locust Street and only a minor portion will utilize the Mapleleaf Drive access off of Greenburg Road. Half-street improvements are typically requirad for developments such as this on adjacent streets. Since Lincoln Avenue is currently unimproved andOproposed to be realigned, 2/3 street improvements should be constructed as a minimum to provide for two-way traffic. Right-of-way does not currently exist for Lincoln Avenue from Oak Street north approximately 280 feet. This area is currently a private residence. The applicant has requested that they be able to form a Local Improvement District to improve Lincoln Avenue to full width from Oak to i , Locust Streets. The district would include properties which would Xi benefit from the Lincoln Avenue link between Oak and Locust Streets. We tr are not opposed to thie request provided the applicant is required to make the two-thirds improvements if the Local Improvement District could not be formed prior to occupancy of the building or ' increase in traffic onto Oak Street, Locust Street or Greenburg Road from this development. 1940/ 40 The accesses to Locust Street from the parkingarage are shown to be approximately 80 feet from centerline to centerline to Lincoln Avenue and 65 feet from centerline to centerline to another access. 92nd Avenue, across Locuet Street, i.e also approximately 50 feet from centerline to centerline to Lincoln Avenue. We are concerned that • traffic movements from these two accesses will create an unsafe situation for vehicles and pedestrians. The location of the proposed accesses should be evaluated to determine their best location along • Locust Street or along Lincoln Avenue. 2. The traffic study submitted estimates the vehicle trips generated by thin site to be approximatley 1622 trips per day. The Study recommends the f011owing: A. The existing signal at Greenburg and Mapleleaf remain as a four- . phase operation and be reviewed for interconnection with the 0 Highway 217 traffic eignals to improve traffic circulation on Greenburg Road. B. Lindoln Avenue Should provide adcees to the site from the south. • C. The Locuet/Greenburg intersection be restriped to provide a. lefts turn and right-turn lane for westboUnd Locust Street traffic. We are in agreeMent with the total trip generation of this sited but do not agree with the above recommendations or the distribution of vehicles onto GreenbUrg Road at Locust Street, Oak Street, and Mapleleaf Streets. We feel the Locust Street access to Oreenburg Road will carry much More traffic than dhown on the traffic study. The TraffiC Study shewb the Lincoln Center V will generate a total of 64 vehicles at the Locust t1/4,44, Street intersection of Greenburg Road, 101 vehicles at the Mapleleaf intersection of Greenburg Road, and 28 vehicles at the Lincoln Avenue intersection with Oak Street. It is staff's opinion that this distribution should be approximately 160 vehicles at the Locust Street intersection of Greenburg Road, and approximately 30 vehicles at the Mapleleaf intersection of Greenburg Road. The Oak Street intersection will not be provided as part of this development and therefore will not provide access to the site. The traffic study shows the total traffic on Greenburg road in the P.M. peak hour to be 1274 vehicles at the Locust Avenue intersection and 2551 vehicles at the Mapleleaf intersection. 2:1461- Based on the site generated traffic dia ibution discussed above, it appears that the intersection of Locust. and Greenburg Road meets the signal warrants #1, #2, and #11 as defined by the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, therefore, requiring a signalized intersection. The installation of the signal at Locust Street will impact the traffic flow of Greenburg road which is currently operating near capacity. We feel that additional evaluation Should be performed on the impact of the signal onto Greenburg Road and how this impact can be minimized. Improvements to Greenburg Road May eventually be required to increase its capacity. 3. The Seven story office structure will be constructed over an existing parking lot, therefore the increase in storm drainage in this area will be negligible. The parking structure will be constructed over an existing residential area, increasing the storm drainage runoff from this area. The storm drainage will drain to the south and is proposed to be collected in the realigned Lincoln Avenue roadway. The impact of this increased storm drainage should be evaluated to insure that the increased storm drainage discharge will not impact the properties downstream. The entire drainage basin for this Storm drainage system Should be evaluated to insure that, with ultimate development, the • proposed future storm drainage system within Lincoln Avenue will provide • adequate storm drainage capacity. 4. it appears that adequate sanitary Sewer facilities exist to provide Service to the seven story office structure. Condition : 1. Prior to idsuanCe of a building permit, the appliCant shall satisfy the • conditions of all previous applications, 8DR 87-08 and V 87-07, related • to traffic and drainage improvements. • 2. The applicant Shall re-evaluate the Mapleleaf signal prior to making the improvements required by the previous applidation, to ensure the • improvements will accommodate the Additional traffic from Lincoln Center V. 3. the applioant shall provide for the dedication of additional righb-of,- Way acdording to the proposed realignment of Lindoln Avenue to provide fLit a 60..foot wide right-of-Way as required or minor dollector streets • prior to Vadation ok the existing rightof-waY of LineJan Aventeo The Y.ke. right-of-way shall include an additional 10 feet to the existing right- of-way for 92nd Avenue. Right-of-way shall also be dedicated for the Locust Street improvements. The dedication document shall be on City forms and approved by the Engineering Division. Dedication forms and instructions are available from the Engineering staff. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman. 4. Vacation of the existing right-of-way for Lincoln Avenue and for Mapleleaf Street from 92nd Avenue to LAcoln Avenue shall be approved prior to issuance of a foundation permit for the parking garage. 5. Standard two/third street improvements, including concrete sidewalk, driveway apron, curb, asphaltic concrete pavement, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, streetlights, and underground utilities shall be installed • • along the Lincoln Avenue frontage as shown in the submitted plans. • Improvements shall be designed and constructed to minor collector street standards. Two/third street improvements shall consist of a minimum of half-street improvements plus 10 feet. The improveMents shall be constructed from Locust Street to the point approximately 280 feet north of Oak Street at the end of the existing right-of-way of Lincoln Avenue. Bonding for 100% of the construction cost shall be approved prior to issuance of building permits. STAFF CONTACT: Gary Alfsoa. 6. The applicant shall install a signal at the intersection of Locust Street and Greenburg Road. The applicant shall provide additional traffic engineering to determine the operation of the signal including phasing, timing and inter-connedtion with other Greenburg Road signals. STAFF CONTACT: Gary Alfson. 7. Conditions #5 and #6 shall be waived if a Local Improvement District is formed to improve Lincoln Avenue, full width from Oak to Locust Street to minor collector standards and construct a signal at Locust Street and Greenburg Road designed to limit the impact to traffic on Greenburg Road. Improvements to Greenburg Road, if required by the additional traffic engineering, shall also be included. STAFF CONTACT: Gary Alfson. 8. The applicant shall obtain a facility permit from the Department of Land Use and Transportation of Washington County to perform work in the right-of-way of Greenburg Road. A copy shall be provided to the City Engineering Division prior to issuance of a public improvement permit. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman. 9. The applicant Shall demonstrate that the storm drainage runoff can be discharged into the ecisting drainageway without significantly impacting propertied downetreaM. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry. 10. Sanitary sewer and storm drainage details shall be provided as part of the publid improvement plans. Calculations and a topograyhie map of the storm drainage basin and sanitary sewer !Service area shall be provided as a supplement to the public improvement plans. Caldulations shall be based on full development of the drainage basin. the lOcation and capadity of the existing proposed and future line0 shall be addressed. STAFF CONTACT: dreg Barry. 11. Seven (7) sets of plan and profile public improvement construction plans and die (1) iteinited Construction cost edtimater, tped by a Registered Professional Civil Engineer, detailing all propoded public improvements shall be submitted to the Engineering Division for approval. Two (2) sets of plan and profile plans shall be submitted for preliminary review prior to submittal of final plans. STAFF CONTACT: Gary Alfson. 12. Construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering Division has approved public improvement plans. The section will require a 100% performance assurance or letter of ' commitment, a developer-engineer agreement, the payment of a permit fee and a sign installation/streetlight fee. Also, the execution of a street opening permit or construction compliance agreement shall occur prior to, or concurrently with the issuance of approved public improvement plans. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman. 13. An agreement shall be executed by the applicant, on forms provided by the City, which waives the property owner's right to oppose or remonstrate against a future Local Improvement District formed to complete Lincoln Avenue between Locust and Oak Streets. STAFF CONTACT: Jon Feigion. 14. Street centerline monumentation shall be provided as follows: a) Centerline Monumentation. 1) In accordance with Oregon Revised Statutes 92.060, subsection (2), the centerlines of all street and roadway rights-of-way • shall be monumented before the City accepts a street improvement. 2) The following Centerline monuments shall be set: • A) All centerline-centerline intersection points. B) All cul-de-sac center points. C) Curve points, beginning and ending points (P.C. 's and P.T. 's) . • b) MonuMent Boxes Required • 1) Monument boxeS conforming to City standards will be required • around all dneterline intersection points and cul-de-sac center points. 2) The tops of all monument boxes will be set to finished pavement grade. STAFF CONTACT: Jon Feigion. 15. The existing acCesses to the parking garage on to LoCust Avenue shall be evaluated to determine the beSt location to avoid conflicting turning moveMents and sight distances. The location of the adcesses shall be • approved by the City Engineer prior to iaSuande of fodndation permits. 16. The appliCant shall doMplete any half-street improveMehts to Lodust • street not improved by the Major BtreetS Bond Projedt or revised by the site improvements. 17. Miring donattUCtion of the Site improveMentd, the construction traffic • Shall acdess the area fiat GreenbUrg Road only. All vehicles Shall not 1,1V7 0 • .n rr w.n..�x.rw.w--....t.., 4.n-I�.....vw..,..,-v+A.-�,Mrv(4. r,f MHaa 't♦ ,,...+Uf '�.JYnV%«t k ,.v.:...,wan......,}nvN-+v be allowed to park on Oak or. Locust Streets which are related to the ce)nstrtiction of the subject improvements including employees, subcontractors, material deliveries, etc. APPROVED: • Randall R. Wooley, City Engineer br/SDR89-12.ga • • • • y � • . A . 'J . . t. U . ,j`i, •' , .,,'.t......r........_.`-.1.,..`.......:.....A.1..:',.,.-: ..i. ..__ ...� ..-.,. .,... . .r.n.,....i;,-,., '.t..,a...a....,...r ., .a.1 . wr .. . ., .. _ .. .................'.....-.._,r..._.. ,_ .,a.._ ..,...........z„._..._..«...+.r.....,nxL.:..L�-...e..x...`...I...su.......,.,_...y.kr.�...;w..._.+.,..1..—n.dr:.11.l' ” `' l 't l(901-1(.1& i (a 1 i ‘''' 'bL 1:V e 10 :1.1 .L2 1'M .*- : ' 1 , ' c:-:,''‘.7):''' '''''47.44.:t,:q:4: 1 1.::_ � ,/�! 11 ( • ...„-, i , /0 /7>:9".6.').'./- 2/,' • .. : Z //e7e1 /." /3 //, e.:.,, (-7;„,..- 7):13:6):::}.) k ---11 , ' - /i2' (2 oe/ /�� - / �1 /', Y:$� > ( (._1-J ; :1.I'1.�1. , „ ' 1 ,1--. • /2at)e-_'' 2.)e cf,-)-7 (._„%,/ / -/L- 2z-,/-' ' /-e.,5'/....(-,24.-„,h-2 & ' 1 (1 ,. • -. . .... • 4.,/ �. Y `C'. 1'~' a,,,,'-?f.. ,. '� .. stir-- ,, �i C-'_ Q s, i /d? y'ea ',. 1 ' " ...i, . /,/;)'.,) , j„--';',. .- , ),,,/,;) 06,5 (- c„. ,o . i .. ,! , ' - ro O e ,�' c/ e' 2° // . ,. , ,, i / , �.. / � . . . + /lie C z, 4 y (.:167)-7) ,/2'7&/7/ I ...., . .... ' .,°;�C� "• .i/1/70/.9e- ,s'e e z., ...eo,,,, ,ro.,/ fryl()y-e_ x - yra"' ( e bO ( \cI ► . / �- , , ....._.L .. ., „ ,INAt-A4 _1,.., 9 fir` ✓ C „� ,/i.e.-I,. ,,...i'ec ///,--)0, ,--eo...,,,, 4,. 7.7-c z .- .6:2) - ,_,. . ..,.... ‹..4._4 .,,,,,,,, . - , .„, 4„ .— r /y - --, .c../.,),-,,,. _ et:-.7/ c.s. ',,--.-. .6 71/;:t e 4,e /'.‹,,&.,?,--/2 9 .7'' )44•' *1.4/1 ,.,,x. , „ .,, /? ... 4,12 / !// / ;v /Yo1 / 4 .,....4 • ez,., ' iia i a y t i, -s ....„...,, ,,. . : 4 62 OCOM O 6/0/C: ''' ' 6- , ,C4")el . ,. .0 i El,. ,.., . --,4., . ,.. 1-1 .--, fl")p ■••••,, re.)2.,,..0 )r\o...s „_... Coy.v,...J.„.u.L.,,, 1,c,".„4„ . . ..A.... , .. .0_ .i.c,u, .. ,....1..o.4„ , . . ......___ . e . . „ro ,,,,c2,6, 0 6 (,:..c-r—i)(), i I,..'''' „, _ A e\.(--b....,A ---e,..c.„, „ ...-;::....., ; .4_ .4:... 4 ...„, ... _ , "V, . ' ...,....‘, ..., Av... -----:,: ,, .............. _ _if.:-._ .,c",71..Q.1 .'...:,?,A., . ... . _26_,_,.e,-.174.......,...J._'1:_, ._,....(2a,-) ',./... ' ,1)-4- ' . 1 it 6,y, -- . ' . ././4_, ,,. aIô _ , 1-_,....,_ „w..... .......... . . .,th,co),,,„, ,............ _....„_..__,.....,........ii- k 1.1,,,,..:\,. -... . n. ' . ay \r)00 ' ��. a Lit - . - . . - e , asc ( e (4, \ i v\a .• _Ca_. i iJe .. - 4 ‹., 1,0,a(7.,v. 0 -\--0,,,, c -\--,, 6. : j,\PLAre..., , 1,,,3. ' . i ,_N„,..., ..._ a , <-. 1 ti , , r ' ” rr w�.,�•�x-.�,. ..w�!.,w• ..tee...:. ...�«w._.r'----.-1.-.1._..,.].-.1...-...4 ,.r..r...._..,..IW,.:,. , ,..- --N.✓ ., •1,m �..,....:,__ , ■ 1 ..,._..lr,,..,w. , .�...1..,.,. ..,,•..,».,,.,,.-,..,r............................. , ..�� ,...,,._.u- _:,41..» ...:.::u..>...r......,..,..........._.+,.r....,,«w..�r...r.._..�A+x..,..r....4...r,,.,,.,,,,, .. ._ ....�r.,,...__..._u1_....s`..It. ......+,. wUr,'.u'A4...w..A1.+1:a...,...'1« «rJ«»1,,.:�:::.-.. .. r n I A, `{ • I I A ... ` w L . .�r w. +...,:(./..?:..... .r � . �' .,.u.w..r.A �.. 1`x/0" ���'/ ' 5 /5/&)(1)-,7/7-e.2"C—I/e /Y! ,=. ,/l/e/fi %r','7G- .. - i+ -1 1 IV ✓,1�,f rj l I ., d'f'G.IJ../ ,, ,.4 • 1 4,, ,,�J.�.,» �.',•�.\.G- d.1.1�'.CC „ _...,.. ✓, I I � /\ b e . r 1,,,,20,.,::,'I C.)/- :;:........:„./4„,,,c ......) ,.'///./..),7. , ..,. 1(2-),,-, //I ----. ,. , . .„--1.....__ ,n —/ ' , .S.s,, le/)i e cz...z..„/„.0-, ,a.L., t ,. --,/,,,,3=4„,/c/ /76/ 14.,./6. /v, / /e.,.., _ 7/., • , , 1 _.. , , , ,....., ., e:/. „ .62,/,/ , ,/,,i,-5 c. 0,7 -.4/.-5c. e- „,6,-,/,/c/:--,-/ o 1 .. . , ,., ..... , ,..., (A )())/ cA, ,,, h(t.-)c)..4---?_ivt,.e,.. *-lak.....e___ 1 \ \L.)1 .- C._ ..„'L .F (-IVY\ -,... . . . ' A., .....,k " 1 '77k-ke_. \.f..,t (..-',(:_\ 'Li-- ''sk--f ,c,. .■,� �✓_ „ -- 4 ,‘)-e, v- , .....,.. i OUr'' ., _.. „. s,_ ILI)AD.(...„8 . . ...J.Lc......)1,,) ,... , ... ,.. >,........- . 2.-7.-?--- . .1.__, . .0 ,..._a-J. )."\-N\0 .,,, <---"4" ..„......... a...........6...-..:......, •//2qe'e / "6/2: w,/77 .'''l''Sr'.<'").)<•,) leerel:Z..a..,a...,,,,e',?+.*Z:.t/..' ...../ ..........*. .o.■.........,,..*■...-.... ' t • ti'.r. .-.'� 1�T'c „ " •/1,,,1" .,»_,�....,. „��ti.✓!'/arG,`T ;. ,�.--.,, ~ .. ..C _. 'x....x .,,,.„....v .... ....., :,,,,,0 5 /.��j_-\>...0 4��.r/ .ni.�:.,..Y. / w, r.r. .. ,.�1 V N�rr w.,. r.,rr i..._�.w. w.,.r.. . ,___,.2./..4.,,,, ,_..,,,i. , • • , . , . . . ...._,........._. ..... . , ' 02, ..r.) . . .... C i ....._,.., , , ., ., 0 r) 0+ ( ,. k e_ • \ .., ,. . �x . _,... ✓,�, C�..,„xM...,. �.1r1....�;�,..�..�`�� .aC��l+ ..4.. A'C)�/,y, Y , f��h, &✓..x.. .4s,e,�W✓„.e_ , \.w._.w+.+.+.,...,i7" t 'w g.,�r..�.iw__,_....� ✓._..ir.i�. .. r_...—.�.....r-.__...�,A.. , --------------- ---re) b 1 .>i a•,fn....1.r wJ, ( J nw✓+.+.,.w.. ,. ✓,,.....u..�w �f...�tu.l..-&,�-•0.4.w,...«.1-,r.�...A�.:.",,.�,« «:,w..,.. �/'�„ , y.A: ..,1 .:..w.J.,«..,...;r,..,.. ,._••.ti.,�..:.�a�.�`��`�./�.�.�,.�—✓..b."•.at µ r � I __* _s.,_,, ..... __n,.,w _.:xn._.w..r.S L .,,.. ,., :r-..yA.,_,.........- — - ° i 1 1 I r wr...+1..........._.,.r.w�....'.I.w+,xJ l..«..1 ..r.✓P._,._.✓.w.,,, ..,e..«„ w«✓.xn7..+,u-.--wx,�4.,.:+.,•»..«....w � r .., »�...�L..,J.._..� .+r.. ..,.... � ,..a..w..,w,rw., � �,w.....�.�.�„w' , ...,•.•„•._-..w ..,., �. .,.....,«.,,.,..-«...�.' .r»., w l_.- .-.+.1.A....Jl✓.uwr, ..,fir,..aw.,-'S„,.J4,. _,..w.,ww..p. .. «..w .., J......+,o,..., wu,..,,.._µ---:.w.x,..»�...�+.�-,,,«_:Y,,,. ty .,, .: i', w. � ,,,Iw r.,u..ua+'•++ ,nM nrp., w�«,WHrwmW ... mh.+-.rwr- -� a•, x v.«a,. .ryr!r •f T b _ La ��, e _ 8 y f t --- - - - - - - __ - -_ - _- - - --.1---1.1 - _ (------- _ - _- i • -:- - -------1'4 ''''-C:)("1-41,,D - b _ I- -t-ic.-„-z- L.,_44. EN*-c---1-- • . �S.....4- 5 4 ,-,_ - -. -____—i 1- --' - i_r--i t_-)A-,- __ _,C.,,eptYp 7 1 c:-.„-3 . _- - _- it- F f L/ E k. ' _-- - __ _-o . 1-1:10,,..-4,-.),- • i 4 _ _ - - - _ - E- _ - - i', - {},�..- - SA--.,= G`1.+e� F i _ - _ 1. • 1 �4 - - - - - - - ;- :- - - _ . t • • ` T_ _ __ ; __ _ jam. �, l, L4C:, S' ' - f5_( t-� \- . '..?) _ - C" ` 2to Z S,S. _ ter . .-_ - - 1 . t - ) i _ - - - • I ,� ATTACH THIS TO YC UR 93RD LID - 8�Y �u11 FT,F„ ______ffl - 3` 3j Q- :.',.. _ - c , 3, . - - - - _ j ' ___ ____ -......„..................... 3 F. gal/ -if - - - - IP I -.g cov. Q_ R� 5 . - _ I Ay . _ _ __ I ',. . e•-• T _ . de l- �g .i.ta - , ,1.37 i ,. I .117.„:"Ii. X X I . .. - - t. . _ t it- . Z 4, - L - _ __ -1 - fr -- -11iiii - - 1 �R - - - F M�•- - - --_ - - - - - - _ - - '- - F - - - ~a _ = Mir"41 I I I� ; _. __ ._ - _- - 1 - 4 -,./;" L - .-'',4,- _ _ „ ,_ ,_ ,.... ..------- - fl, 11, :. . rie .....lirit 4. - - 0 ? i __ - 4'"-. = - - _ - - _ - _ 1--- - - I'? t 1 ...4 t:-•- 7 r- _ __- _ I 10: -4 -- - / ,___ \ _ , _ - _ \ _ \_______1 *14. nal..- - ,.z _ _ - I L - - - - - - y - - -- -- _ - - _ - - - —___,N, , t , / \ ,./// •- _. 4�i �'' t r --- 'Rik) . ...,_ , _.,________ .. HTPAR4tL - 10' I: 1 -- . . . . P• . -2.4111111•111111111111Z...... - i .• ar ,LCVS l—�- - 55.5 ter Y Ram /8-4 r - .------- ---\ . --------------- ----, -- _ __.-------- - _-____ , _ k_ C-- --f-j'....N\r" r----fl - . $O -___ / ; i V1 \..___ ------- , .....-- ----' - - 170 ,t / m 'ems �-. T`. \ . la . 10 ik , z f --------'7 RECEIVED / /#-''' -MAY 1 0 1989 r - - - - - - - - - d - - - .. ®o—i_ ¢,v.6,, - `.ri-6t:-1 3,....i Q1.—iv:r: • . . MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Deborah Stuart, Assistant Planner • DATE: May 18, 1989 / 7 FROM: Gary Alfson, TralnIsportation Engime-e SUBJECT: SDR 89-12 - Lincoln Center V Comments: The applicant proposes to construct a 7 story, 125,000 square foot, office building and a 2-story parking garage adjacent to the existing Lincoln Center Development site. The parking garage structure is proposed on property east of the site. This property was recently approved for a zone change for the 2- story garage structure. The 7 story office building is proposed to be located north of the existing Lincoln 3 office building. The conditions of approval for previous applieations on this Lincoln Center site included improvements to Mapleleaf Drive, Oak Street, and Locust Street. The improvements to Oak Street and Locust Street have been completed. The improvements to Mapleleaf Drive, involving revisions to the existing signal and providing three westbound approach lanes to Greenburg Road, have not been completed. Other conditions of improvements included relocating the existing accesses onto Oak and Locust Streets when Lincoln Avenue is improved. The driveway0 were required to be relocated to avoid close spacing between the public street and the driveway. The applicant proposes to relocate Lincoln Avenue at Locust Street to the eat to the intersection at 92nd Avenue. A traffic report has also been submitted with this application evaluating the impact of this development onto the adjacent street. 1, Access to the site will be from Locust Street, Lincoln Avenue (93rd Avenue) and Mapleleaf Drive. The submitted site plan for Lincoln Center V shows four accesses onto Locust Street, plus the Lincoln Avenue intersection and the Mapl eaf Drive intersection to Locust Street. Two accesses are proposed ont the relocated Lincoln Avenue and One access is proposed onto the extended Mapleleaf Drive, Locubt Street is a major collector street . and will be improved in 1989 a0 a result of previous developments and the Tigard Major Street Bone, Projects. It'S intersection with Greenburg Road is currently unOignalized. The construction plans are currently being designed for the Locust Street improvements. The applicant should coordinate the design Of the two projects so that construction can occur without duplication of efforts. • Lincoln Avenue is designated as a minor collector Street from oak street to Locust Street. The proposed realignment of Lincoln Avenue is largely unimproved or nonexistent. 92nd AVenue at Locust Street has a 50 foot _ wide right-of-way. Minor collector Streets require a 60-toot wide right-of,..way and a 40 foot paved Width plUs Sidewalks, streetlights, and associated underground utilities. Additional right-of-Way will need to be dedidated along the west edge of the existing 92nd Avenue to create the 60 foot wide right-of-way required for a Minor collector street. rro, , • • Since Lincoln Avenue will only intersect Locust Street, it is our opinion that most of the traffic coming to and from the site will utilize Locust Street and only a minor portion will utilize the Mapleleaf Drive access off of Greenburg Road. Half-street improvements are typically required for developments Such as this. Since Lincoln Avenue is currently unimproved and proposed to be realigned, 2/3 street improvements should be constructed to provide for two-way traffic on 'Lincoln Avenue. Right-of-way does not currently exist for Lincoln Avenue from Oak Street north approximately 280 feet. This area is currently aesidence. piegOke The accesses to Locust Street from the parkingc)arage are shown to be approximately 80 feet from centerline to centerline to Lincoln Avenue and 65 feet from centerline to centerline to another access. 92nd Avenue, across Locust Street, is also approximately 50 feet from centerline to centerline to Uncoil Avenue. We are concerned that traffic movements from these two accesses will create an unsafe situation for vehicles and pedestrians. The location of the proposed accesses Should be evaluated to detere'ne their best location along Locust Street or along Lincoln Avenue. 2. The traffic study submitted estimates the vehicle trips generated by this site to be approximatley 1622 trips per day. The Study recommends the following: A. The existing signal at Greenburg and Mapleleaf remain as a four- phase operation and be reviewed for interconnection with the Highway 217 traffic signale to improve traffic Circulation on dreenburg Road. B. Lincoln Avenue should provide access to the site from the south. C. The Loeuet/Greenburg intersection be restriped to provide a left- turn and right-turn lane for westbound Locust Street traffic. We are in agreement with the total trip generation of this site, but do not agree with the above recommendations or the distribution of vehicle8 onto Greenburg Road at Logust Street, Oak Street, and Mapleleaf Streets. We feel the Locust Street access to Greenburg Road will carry much more traffic than shown on the traffic study. The Traffie Study shows the Lineoln Center V will generate a total of 64 vehicles at tho Locust Street interseCtion of dreenburg Road, 101 vehicles at the Mapleleaf intersection of Greenburg Road, and 28 vehicles at the Liz-Idol-ft Avenue intersection with Oak Street. It is staffla opinion that this dip' :oution should be approximately 160 vehicles at the Locust Street intersection of Greenburg Road, and approximately 30 vehi0100 at the Mapleleaf intersection of Greenburg Road. The Oak Street intersection Will not be provided as part of this development and therefore will not provide access to the Site The traffic study ehow0 the total traffic on Greenburg road in the P.M. peak hour to be 1214 vehicles at the Loctst Avenue interslection and 2551 vehicles at the Mapleleaf interSection. - . ' • . . I fr?-6 Based on the site generated traffic distribu ion discussed above, it appears that the intersection of Locust Avenue and Greenburg Road meets , the signal warrants #1, #2, and #11 as defined by the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, therefore, requiring a signalized intersection. 3. The seven story office structure will be constructed over an existing parking lot, therefore the increase in storm drainage in this area will be negligible. The parking structure will be constructed over an existing residential area, increasing the storm drainage runoff from this area. The storm drainage will drain to the south and is proposed to be collected in the realigned Lincoln Avenue roadway. The impact of this increased storm drainage should be evaluated to insure that the increased storm drainage discharge will not impact the properties downstream. The entire drainage basin for this storm drainage system should be evaluated to insure that, with ultimate development, the proposed future storm drainage system within Lincoln Avenue will provide adequate storm drainage capacity. 4. It appears that adequate sanitary sewer facilities exist to provide service to the seven story office structure. Conditions: 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall satisfy the donditione of all previous applications, SDR 87-08 and V 87-07> re14,144 k )7742-gc, a4,6410411/ue0 /4414760944aS. 2. The applicant: shall re-evaluate the Mapleleaf signal prior to making the . improvements required by the previous application , to ensure the improvements will accommodate the additional traffic from Lincoln 6 Center V. 3. The applicant shall dedicate additional right-of-way according to the proposed realignment of Lincoln Avenue to provide for a 60-foot wide right-of-way as required for minor collector streete. The right-of-way shall include the exieting right-of-way for 92nd Avenue, plus an additional 10 feet to the west. The dedication document shall be on City forms and approved by the E gineeting Divisien. Dedication forms and instructions are available from the Engineering staff. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman. L /2. f 1,4d0111 fActet dAD driza d qiitt 6960+ *041 1411MtAMthet4 4. Standard two/third street improvements, includLng concrete sidewalk, • driveway apron, curb, asphaltid concrete pavement, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, Streetlights, and underground utilities Shall be installed along the Lindoln Avenue frontage as shown in the submitted plans. Improvements shall be designed and conetructed to minor collector street standards. Two/third street improvements shall consist of a Minimum Of half-Street improvements plue 10 feet. The improvements shall be construCted from Locust Street to the of approximately 280 feet north of Oak Street at- the end of the existing right-of-way of Lincoln Avenue. STAFF CONTACT: Gary Alfson. • 5. The applicant shall install a signal at the intersection of LocUst • Street and Greenburg Road. The applicant shall provide additional traffic engineering to determine the phasing of the signal. STAFF • CONTACT: Gary Alfeon. , f 4 6. The applicant shall obtain a facility permit from the, Department of Land Use and Transportation of Washington County to perform work in the ' right-of-way of Greenburg Road. A copy shall be provided to the City Engineering ineerin g Division prior or to issuance of a public improvement permit. STAFF. CONTACT: John Hagman. 7 The applicant shall demonstrate that the storm drainage runoff can be discharged into the existing drainageway without significantly impacting properties downstream. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry. 8. Sanitary sewer and storm drainage details shall be provided as part of the public improvement plans. Calculations and a topographic map of the , storm drainage basin and ''sanitary sewer service area shall be provided as a supplement to the public improvement plans. Calculations shall be based on full development of the drainage basin. The location and f capacity of the existing proposed and future,. lines shall be addressed., • STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry. 9. Seven (7) sets'.of plan, and profile public improvement construction'plans and one (1) itemized construction cost estimater., stamped by a Registered Professional Civil Engineer, detailing all proposed public imp rovements shall be submitted to the Engineering Division for approval. Two (2) sets of plan and profile plans shall be submitted for preliminary review prior to submittal of final plans. STAFF CONTACT: Gary Alf Eton. 10. Construction of roP public ublic' improvements shall not commence until , after the engineering Division has approved public improvement plans. The section will require a 100% performance assurance or letter of ' mien developer-engineer agreement, payment of a p fee coni�rtit t, a dev the ' .; permit and a sign isntallation/streetlight execution g lation/streetl.�ght fee. Also, the execut�. of a street o p enin g per it oo r r construction compliance agreement shall oc cur ' prior to, or concurrently with the issuance of approved public • improvement plans. STAFF CONTACT: John Hag man., Shall be executed by the applicant, on forms provided by ll: An agreement, P �' the City which waives the property owner's right to oppose or remonstrate against a future Local Improvement District formed to complete between Locust and Oak STAFF CONTACT:Streets. ' Lincoln Avenue 'bet TAI'F CONT - Jon Feigion. 12. Street centerline monumentation shall be provided as follows: a a) Centerline i onumentation. 1) In acdor with Oregon Revised 92.060, subsection ;, . _. . Sta�dtr�adwa....6rights-of-way ' , the center • ,. ordanCe w ( � lines of all street and roadway shall be mono y accepts t • � secs' t�3' teat . • went. . .. before tkie, C .t mentecx b i a s I • improvement. 2) The following centerline monuments shall be, set: ne 'intersection a ' A) All eQnterline-ceni�e.rl.i po>Lht•s.' B) to points r ., cel r All cul dewa'ac r P 0) Curve points, in ts, begin. nin g and end ing points (P.d. 's aa l P.T. 1 ) . D4 t ......,, .......s_. u . , ..4..«_.a-..4�.....�.«...:.w....rl...�,.,._c.A��..�..„n..,+A...::wt ir.�.,.-.«...+.M« .. ..,.1,;riW...l.,... .i-:-,.-drN....�.,��n..F�.+:..1.Mi:. • b) Monument Boxes Required 1) Monument boxes conforming to City standards will be required around all cneterline intersection points and cul-de-sac center points. 2) The tops of all monument boxes will be set to finished pavement grade. STAFF CONTACT: aon Feigion. 13. The existing accesses to the parking garage on to Locust Avenue shall be evaluated to determine the best location to avoid conflicting turning �' • r movements a The location of the accesses shall be approved by the City Engineer p for to issuance of building permits aokd 14. The applicant shall complete any half-street improvements to Locust , Street not improved by the Major Streets Bond ,Project or revised by the site improvements. 15. During construction of the site improvements, the construction traffic • shall access the area from reenburg Road only. All vehicles shall not be allowed to park on Oa] r Locust Streets which are related to the • • construction of the u 7 ect improvements including employees, s r subcontractors, material deliveries, etc. Randall R. t ooley, City Engine br/SnR89-12.ga • • Aftlf 1, 'elAil..L.�41 Jn.n• ..,aL/u'7 "�...«A.�„« .+,...0 ..w.t_.—d�I,.At.u.N.,, ...-.w ..i.w.yiw.....�.w,..�..�.,�k.a......^..,u,..,a,,.+,,.....r4.1...........a..�.,�,....«.,..�......,.a..._.._ ._u.,, �, �jF...,iw.,r�_.,,......I.-.1..4.......I..,a...,.,iG,J.,o..:iN2M»:,.:?L'�.�u.J:.1'..Ak,.4i..y.n4.1:—w 1..1�1u✓WTI , MACKENZIE/S TO &ASSOCIATES, P.C., OREGON MACKENZIE/S ,.,.0&ASSOCIATES,P,S.,WASHINGTON ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS 0690 SW. BANCROFT STREET PORTLAND, OREGON 97201 (503) 224-9570 May 9, 1984 melY o 198 Howard Harris P. d. Box 176 Portland, OR 9720I Dear Howard: yy, Count Center Parking t.r� ��. Lincoln is This letter is confirmation of our conversation regarding the status of the Lincoln Center parking count per PUP requirements as filed under Permit #348019. PERMIT BY PIED . � EXISTING • Lincoln Saving & Loan 171 185 Lincoln Center . Lincoln One 439 Lincoln Two 287 Parking ark�n Structure CENTER TOTAL 829 1,110. . L I�coLICENTER If you have any further questions, please call. Sincerely . of rey P. Reeves P R/ ►l a d F . cc: Jack Goddard 4 r � � .�...'..r., ...,�.,,.,, F. r ...,1. 14., d., ,.., .�...........::.... .........0...�.�.,...,. ,.,....,,....,w. ..,. ..... .,...,......, ...J:..,v _,✓.......,,._ � „�. ..... .....,.,,. l.. ...+�... ..,..��..L_.�.., .�.,.,.. .,.„ n., .,..i,,.,,�..r. „ w ,. .... � • INGRIM / MILLS , P . C . Architecture/Planning/Interior Design May 5, 1989 ' 1 Ms. Deborah A. Stuart Assistant Planner Community Development Department 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. P.O. Box 23397 ' Tigard, Oregon 97223 PB: LINCOLN FIVE, HEIGHT VARIANCE REQUEST. LINCOLN FIVE, PARKING SIZE AND COMPACT RATIO VARIANCE SPR—87—08/V, 87-07—TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY. SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION PERTAINING TO SITE APPLICATION SUBMITTED APRIL 25, 1989. Dear Deborah: Pursuant to our original submission, please accept the enclosed testimony and points of fact to enhance our original discussion. The enclosed prior Site Development Review and its text, ate for the Lincoln Tower project, however, this is pertinent information describing the history of the property, discussion of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change, (Case No. 87-73-M) and a special Use Permit for a parking lot (Case No. 87-122-SU) . Variances for Lincola_Elye_2re requested to exceed the allowable height in the C..- -iiiane of-4,6fette-watid'rcraTroTrtiompa.ct parking Spaces that a.re. 8 feet in width, rather than 8.5 Please review pages , an. of Exhibit “120 (Notice of DeciSion • SDR 87-08, Variance V87-07) specifically paragraph oB'o re: Analysis and Conclusion, and on page 5, the Section referenced "Variance" pertaining to subsection 18.114.050 of the Development Code. 4k FUrther, On page 5, note "Height" and the inSacing staff • discussion. Additionally on page 6-7, paragraph "C" Decision, please not relevant factS of intere5t which should apply to the new Lincoln Five Building. • Per enclosed, Exhibit "lB" as originally submitted April 15, 1987 • on Lincoln Tower, please note speCifiC fats Which apply at Lincoln Five, On page 1 of the bMission, please note diScussion . pertaining to seek permission to provide tip to 45% compact spaceS. For Lincoln Five use, we are following the same logic, and herein One Centerpointe Dthe Suite 300 Lake Oswego, Oregon 4)701,5 Telephone: (503) 620-2025 / VAX: (503) 684-1227 iu:k'Lc. .i» raµ..,:a...s;,.. 4-..lM., u.-..v. . .._. ..... ...,..a...... w..-.....,w::.,.»a 1141F::.:i...«a..u,.uy.........:...1-.,....,..a'I i.,,a,ur„ ,..-n.i4...• Lw.-...t6.::Li:4::...,.�.,.........w....a,.._...�.. :.,r..4,44.4.44 t 744 1 it Ms. Deborah A. Stuart Page are requesting 45% compact parking. Proposed parking for Lincoln Five will be 378 new spaces, a combination of surface and garaged spaces Pui si ant to the Height Variance, please note our request of 92 feet in the C-P Zone Review of our floor area, with respect to our foot print, on-site ancillary uses, building code provisions, and adjacent land use, which all attribute to the necessity of our Height Variance. Please review page 3 pf Exhibit "1B".- Title III, re: Discussion of the proposed parkin g size and compact ratio variances, to include comparative studies of city, county, and proposed sizes. If additional discussion or specific clarification is requested pertaining to this addendum of our original submission, please do not hesitate to notify us. We feel very strongly that the additional information pertaining . to "Height" further adds clarity to our position for our requests. . Pursuant to our parking request, we feel the previous criteria on .�'"` p P which the city has responded,, sets these precedences for reviewing ' compact parking in this specific large Lincoln project. Thank you for your time and consideration' in this most important matter. P Respectfully submitted, E. Da e In grim, .''pp'' 7T► Y President enclosure 11A ( TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MAY 2, 1989 1. Vice President Pyre called the meeting to order at 7:30 PM. The meeting was held at the Tigard Civic Center - TOWN HALL - 33125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard t Oregon. t 2. ROLL CALL: Present: President Moen (arrived' 7:33 PM); Commissioners . Barber, Fyre, Newton (arrived 7:35 PM), Peterson, Rosborough, and Saporta. Absent: Commissioners Castile and Leverett. Staff: Assistant Planner Jerry Offer and Assistant Planner Deborah Stuart; City Engineer Randall . Wooley; and Planning Secretary Diane M. Jelderks. President Moen arrived. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Barber noted two corrections. Commissioner Rosborough moved and Commissioner Peterson seconded to approve the minutes as corrected. Motion carried by majority of Commissioners present. Commissioners Fyre, Moen, and Saporta abstained. 4. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATION There was no communication. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.1 SUBDIVISION S 89-05 BENCHVIEW ESTATES JOINT VENTURE/MUELLER NPO 4 3 BenChview Estates Joint Venture/Mueller To delete a one foot wide "non- vehicular access reservation strip" along the Benchview Tertade Street frontage of lots 18 and 19 of Benchview Estates Subdivision. ZONE: R-4.5 e (Residential, 4.5 units/adre). LOCATION: 13643 SW BenchView ',lade and 13483 SW Clearview Way (WCTM 231 4DC, tax lots 1800 and 1900) Assistant Planner Offer reviewed the proposal and made staff's • recommendation for approval with two conditions, APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION o Louis Paean°, 2455 SW Gregory, West Linn, OR, Benchview Estates Joint I , Venture, supported staff's recommendation. They Were requesting the modification because of the steepness of the slopes Also, the estiMated traffid would not Warrant restricting accese to BendhView Terrace. Diecuseion followed regarding driVeWay acdesees fdr lots 15, 16, and 17. PLANNING COMMISSION 4/Ms - MAY 2, 1989 - PAGE 1 " A • r -..J...,.:4.._....,.•rA,"..,.+.+.«._«_...v,. «i-.-.y•-. .w-'.,..,,. .a,•.._ .. „-.,,,«..... •,:.... :,r..I:l... .'.. -.....a.....4....r•r,_I» ..+..w.._,.....ti...w,.._..,.. o Jack Schwab, Attorney, 9250 SW Tigard Street, representing Edwin & Sharon Mueller who have purchased and designed a home for the site would like access to Benchview Terrace. They feel this is a viable alternative and will minimize the impact to the site. PUBLIC TESTIMONY o No one appeared to speak. • PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED o Commissioners Peterson and Saporta shared the CPO's concern regarding traffic safety with future development. • V . io Commissioners Newton, Barber, Rosborough, Fyre, and Moen also shared the CPO's concerns regarding traffic, however, they supported staff's recommendation as being a viable solution. * Commissioner Rosborough moved and Commissioner Barber seconded to approve S 89-05 based on staff's findings a1d conditions Motion carried by majority of Commissioners present. Commissioners Saporta and Peterson voting no. 5.2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 89-05 & ZONE CHANGE ZC 89-05 CROW OREGON, INC. NPO 1 8 A request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Professional Commercial and 'a Zone Change from R-4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units/acre) to C-P (Professional Commercial) for `` seven parcels and portions of two others totalling approximately 2.21 acres. Also requested is an amendment to the Metzger-Progress' Community Plan to revise the alignment of SW 93rd Avenue. LOCATION: 9220, 9260, 9330 Locust; 10175 92nd; 9225, 9255 Mapleleaf (WCTM 151 35AB, fax lots • 700, 701, 702, 500, 501, 600, 900, and parts Of 28.00,1002) Assistant Planner Deborah Stuart reviewed the proposal, noted changes in the staff report, and Made staff'S recommendation for approval o ppr l f the • a' Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change for lots 900 and 1002; denial of the Comprehensive • Change for the Six P Plan Amendment and Zone Ch re' ` and denial of the re' nest to amend the Metzger.- residential lots; aa, qu Progress Community Plan. Discussion followed regarding the proposed development. Ra ndall Wooley, city Engineer, addressed tra ffic conce vns statin g n r g t ha t the proposal could result major changes to Highway 217. Discussion followed regarding who would bear the cost of a stud ., alternative he c yp a:cesaea to the area, traffic circu lation, traffic dapacity, Surrounding ng zoning, access to 217, and signaliZation. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MAY �! .989 - PAGE 2 • • b APPLICANT'S PRESENTATIOPr o David Blake, Partner, Trammell Crow Company, 10260 SW Greenburg Road, • Portland, OR 97223, reviewed the existing site and proposed structures • which could ld be constructed without the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment. He reviewed the layout of existing traffic patterns. He reviewed the proposed structures if the Comprehensive Plan, Zone Change, and Metzger -- Progress Community Plan were amended. He reviewed the proposed road alignment, adding that the proposed alignment would provide . a better collector street and that the school would benefit by additional parking and better screening. Discussion followed with Commissioners . regarding what would be permitted, what is proposed, and the road ' alignment. Commissioner Newton left 8:35 PM � ,�° a" ( A6 I" o Cathy Chase, 8365 SW Steve, Tigard, OR 97223, stated she is a member of NPO # 8 and a member of the Parent Facility Association at Metzger School. She read and submitted written testimony regarding meetings she had attended and the results of those meetings. She wanted tle'Commission to know that she had talked with a number of people in the community and the people favor the applicant's proposal with the Comprehensive Plan, Amendment. o Andrew Snyder, 1017.5 SW 92nd, Tigard, OR 97223, tax lot 501, has lived in the area for 20 years. He felt the traffic problems were created by the shopping center. He supported the applicant's request. • o Ann Creswell, 8775 SW Locust # 13, Tigard, OR 97223, favored the proposal., o Jack Steiger, 18436 SW Sandpiper, Lake Oswego, OR 97035, supported the proposal. o Mrs, Mork, Daughter-in-Law for Doris L. Kleinpell, 9220 SW Locust St., r Tigard, OR, 97223 supported the proposal. • a' Marty Presley, 9260 SW Locust, Tigard, OR 97223, tax lot 700, favored the proposal. o Michael Presley, 9260 SW Locust, Tigard, OR 97223, favored the proposal stating that he did not want to live next to a six story o 9 r . king Structure o Brian Se an, 9225 SW M..ap l.e leaf; Tigard, OR 97223, lot 600,• Supported rted the proposal for the following reasons: 1 Different group already y support 1) ead° o2) one t next to a story parking the proposal. � No� on wants to live ne, � six st:�" structure. 3) The new road being proposed would benefit Metzgez. School. o Rick Rogers, 9140 SW Locust, . lot 202, s4.8t;. t ' he i the closest g' E'Q that t residential property and Support of �the proposed os ed development, O rt stated the existing roads are in Shabby condition. llO, the o additional parking for the school will increase Safety. PLANNING CO ISSION 1MYNU".L'ES - .. ._.. MAY 2, 1989 PAS 3 � � � � � � � � 4 `�' ' pY ° Mark Vander Yacht, 9125 SW Locust, Tigard, OR 97223, lives in the County. His basic concern is traffic created by Washington Square. He felt Trammell Crow's project would have a limited impact. Berry Helm, 9255 SW Mapleleaf, Tigard, OR, 972230 tax lot 702, supported the request. Brian Halverson, 10180 SW 93rd, Tigard, OR 97223, tax lot 701, has the 0' 4 * ' ' " ' only home which faces the Trammell Crow project. If the six story parking 0f structure were approved he is close enough to count the brickg. He supported the proposed request with the ground level parking structure. , • John S. Blomgren, 9960 SW Oak, Tigard, OR 97223, opposed the proposal. He felt traffic concerns should be taken care of prior to development. . • REBUTTAL * • David Blake stated they recognize that there is substantial traffic in the area and support/ urban renewal; however, improvements will not happen if • development is prohibited. I Discussion followed with staff regarding approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment requiring a deed restriction on the residential properties and improvements to SW 93rd Avenue. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED • Consensus of the Commission was to support Trammell Crow's proposal, especially since they have the support of the neighborhood. The Commission also felt a deed restriction should be required for the residential properties limiting development to a parking structure as e proposed. They recognize '..hat traffic problems need to be addressed. • Commissioner Pyre moved and Commissioner Barber seconded to forward a recommendation for approval to City Council; further recommending that City Council impose a deed restriction limiting the development on the \- residential property to a two single story parking structure (top story at grade level) . Motion carried unanimously by Commiasioners present. RECESS 9:15 PM RECONVENE 9:25 PM 1 . 5.3 COMPAEHENSIVg PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 89-04 MUGHIgS/POSCO LANDS NPO 4 2 A request for a Comprehensive Plan map amendment from Professional Commercial to Medium High Density Resiidential and a zone change from d-P (Professional Commercial) to R-25 (Residential,, 25 units/acre) for 1.75 acres. Also, a Comprehensive Plan map amendment from Medium-Density Residential to Medium-High Density Residential and a zone change from A- 12 (Residential, 12 units/acre) to 1 -25 for 3.02 acres. The subject parcels abut each other. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 2, 1985 - PAGE 4 71( . Assistant Planner Jerry Offer reviewed the staff report and made staff's recommendation for approval. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION o Phil Hedrick, applicant's representative, 111 SW 5th Avenue, Suite 3850, • Portland, OR, explained that the lot presently zoned C-P has visibility problems and is not marketable for commercial professional use. They feel that multi-family is a alternative use that is marketable because of the site's location to transportation and shopping. The lot zoned R-12 ia currently developed with a nonconforming use and the increase to medium high density would bring it into conformance. PUBLIC TESTIMONY • Dan Gott, NPO # 1 Chairperson stated that they had discussed this request 4 at great lengths and were at a quandary a0 what to do. They did not have a quorum at their meeting so they did not vote on this request. • • David Hughes, Rt. 3 Box 278E, Sherwood Or, stated he has owned the vacant -• site for 10 years and has tried to have the site developed. However, • A because of the visibility problem he is not able to compete with the other areas in town zoned C-P. He has now found a residential developer who is willing to work with him. Mary Brazil, 11463 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223, was concerned about traffic congestion. She felt Hall Blvd. needed to be widened before any development takes place. • Richard Murray, 11440 SW Lomita, Tigard, OR 97223, stated that the existing vacant lot is in such a mess that he is tempted to support the request. However, he is concerned with the problems that such a development would create, such as noise, which he wouldn'L have at night if the site is developed commercial professional. He was also concerned because existing apartments in the area currently have drug problems and the police are constantly having to respond to calls. APPLICANT'S REBUTTAL • ' I , o Phil Hedrick, reiterated the Engineer's report which stated that the apartment would create less of a traffic impact. He stated that there would be a 30 foot setback from the residential area with 6 foot cedar fending and plantings for screening. There will not be any windows constructed on the weat Side of the development. • PUBLIC TESTIMONY o H. M. Brazil, 8834 SW Bohman Parkway, Tigard, OR 97223, asked if he cpuld testify, he had not signed up to speak, Chairman Moen agreed and added 'h his name to the sign up sheet. • t MANNINO cpkals8IoN glinfts - MAY 2, 1989 - PAGE 5 • e 4 • • ANIIII1111111111111.1111 • • • • o H. M. Brazil, disagreed with the traffic report. He felt the whole area should be left as one zone and be developed as commercial professional. APPLICANT'S REBUTTAL • Phil Hedrick stated that they had no problems with the rest of the area developing as commercial professional. However, Mr. Hughes would like to 4 develop his property now as multi-family residential. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED 4) Consensus of Commission was for denial. They were concerned that this would create a Spot zone making it difficult for abutting C-P properties to develop and they did not feel a R-25 zone should abut an R-4.5 zone, * Commissioner Fyre moved and Commissioner Peterson seconded to forward a recommendation of denial to City Council based on the following reasons. 1. Thi0 Is creating a spot zone. 2. The change would create problems for adjadent property owners. 3 R-25 zoning should not be adjacent to R-4.5 zoning. 4. Lot 3300 is currently developed close to the R-12 designation. , Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present, 504 SIG! CODE EXCEPTION VCR 89-10 BISSETT NPO #2 A request for a Sign Code Exception to allow retention of an oversized (148.5 square foot per face) and an overheight (30.5 foot high) freestanding sign. The Code standards for freestanding signs in the C.-G zone allow 70 sq. ft. per sign face and a maximum height of 20 feet. ZONE: C-G (General Commercial) LOCATION: 11989 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 151 35DD, tax lot 5102) . Assistant Planner Stuart reviewed the proposal and made staff's recommendation for denial of the variance and approval of a sign code exception for a height of 25 feet and sign size of 87.5 sq. ft. per side. • APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION o Larry BiBsett, 2204 NW Irving, Portland, OR 91209, explained that there id no visibility to their building as they were required to have a 80 foot setback from Padifid Highway when the building was constructed in 1969. Setback requirements were changed to ten feet and then again to zero feet. Currently the sign is obscured by the 8ank building and the Theater. He felt that staff's recommendation would make the sign unusable. o Mark CuShing, Goodyear Representative, 11989 SW Pacific Highway, Tigard, ' OR, 97223, Sbated that the sign is crucial for their busineds and decreasing the height and size would not be viable. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MAY 2, 1989 - PAGE 6 .• 40'4Aff , rql.; ' 4 i r:e' a in,. 'r' .� ,o �: ' � ... r, u', y q',t`r •`u'" U'{ h° '�o' .. � ' i �, �t. ' r ...K.r. ...w rmh,..r.0-. x. ✓U...n,.• A._r...-.-v .,.r.r.r.W r4 A--...,u.,...,,x"N..lw.s......il_ .......r.W......;M I.rAx i i,4.....a:`.44..w.+.:1. ..+:... - u.. ,.... ., _a rw• .F.J,_.A.•L.113'W.,rr;A.11...K'+h...r.:w� ::Vx..11�.1..•.»...aw....ln.-:.M...w..�N:l«.4a. }A • PUBLIC TESTIMONY I,'., r. o No one appeared to speak. .. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED « �a o Consensus of the Commission was to support staff's recommendation. Discussion followed 'Whether additional height or size, above staff's recommendation, should be permitted. �• * Commissioner, Saporta moved and Commissioner Rosborough seconded to deny Varianoe V 89-16 and approve Sign Code Exception SCE 89.10 per staff's recommendation, and conditions. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present. ! . OTHER BUSINESS o Assistant Planner Jerry offer explained that there is a Site Development � P � Review proposal that the applicant feels will be appealed to she Planning Commission and they would like to have the'. Commissiun review the proposal this instead of the Director. M . Offer' explained that can be done per • F P Section 18.32.090. Discussion followed regarding hearing the item on May 16th or on June 6th. Consensus of the Commission' eras' to hear the item on June 6th. I I 7. ADJOURNMENT 11:00 PM • 6-ifte.„ Diane M. lg'= °"ks Secretary rr ATTEST: A Donald Moen, President I I �7 �ry b�MJ�• d u o S 2 o • • I II ' I 1! PLANNING COMMIS 30� R �N TTES �.; MAY 2 y 989 PAGE 7 I ' G • 1. r., I wl • f u .r• it • • .,.— 1 , • • } '� .,.=+-J--.b�..,,w u...a..._ .R-I==K"�,Y ,:�•' Jv�� ,• •..., rV 9•K M ).C ,... ,. �.. ILT '. 8,, ..•., , . 4,,,,, . ., . . ,r. � � VM G ' ,,•i . ..... . ,.. 1 . „ . . i 1 ^AA n .; �u. y n . .. '(itc-,./7), , i . 6 '''''''''') . • , ' ei'g'ie.-e,,,d,'-?,. 0:. ..* '''''' ',.,,44'1',,H./....)e,' . ... .. .. , . . : . • 1u �� ( ,; a h ll • , , 6 dry'' ' r '' I �a I, //j . am r • „U/ r .a .. . RA) • • v 1 , , . ..i. 6)61..,t,f . . , , ... , , . , . . , I 1 . ' . I I l‘A' I '1)/k...) . '' ' ' ' ' r a 1/(0. . . . .. . I } fir' !r� r • ., 7 . • 5 r A,'D C c ,�I,, � :, .. . „ , . ,,,„...„,,,. .,,,,,,, ,.../. , , r .„,,,,„,,,,, . . . ., . , .. , . . . , , " . ,.. .2,9' ., .... .' . . -:., .' , : ,At.'.. 1 ' . . . . . . . . . , • • • v , , (i,,. ,,,v., VVV , , ....,,,,,,,,, 7, ,,,,i,,1„, •, : .... 1, q,c/ ,, , , , . ' 1 rl '''rw : ' ' Il.'"''' /+'_: ''''''' r:' ' P , :: : ' . y� I � I 'rte x ` I i , i n. 'r..W.l.....i:,_�.rn.u'.,..,... .��..•. _.,�': �,.li r. .....i. .....Yxl.Wrt+4.._..,yam,+..a " .' V ..,111 40 • PLANNING DIRECTOR'S APPROVAL FOR LINCOLN CENTER PHASE V , l Condition 5 d T count Final� caun of parking spaces 5 d i Parking Prior to Construction : ; r,-' x �40 z•. II , 311 III 325 I 784 C, r , 1 5 d (i i) Total Number Displaced by Now. Building (Phase I) 11 14 gain III 14 loss i •r Total Number Displaced by New Building (Phase II) 1 zz o �ia ..w r, III '22s gal n I V '""9-"1-o s`s i� i 5 d (iii) Total Number of Standard, and Compact for Lincoln Center Phase, V Standard 203 1 Compact 166 i` 5 d (iv) h I .1.. ., Ir5 775 V 369 1 MC 14.81 t 1m *7 'm , , i N' h '1, w s a i . i i r P h' axe 1: , .../ y ' '" #G z ~, ✓. r ,-" „n � p M ' •P d`H r�Y �;,irF nR �' r Lh `,a +r .. .` . r•,`••• F • • r. 'rlw�l , ., , , , , , , 1 . , , . . , , , . , . , . , , . , . , , , „ • . . _. 1 , ... , .• , • ,, ,, ,, , ' 1 , , , 7it' -: - . : t `/, f ,A x „ ' . G fi x, , 3 ry tuY F dip jrfh'' ,„., 'x9 jjpp or (j�', (j4y,Q) • f qa /{rat q.a.y �( �RyY }' ` H�'' 4,/ _ere:. ”" ,, r:Licw�Y 1M1.". 61 t iCrv;e {t*., M1`' � 7 (,,,' .T k,„,,,,4 d¢1�1' Y.1?4, „My ,11'r',j yyy,. r wr m�u..........,Y°,;-H,•Y tn+*. •MiW^• .h.h Lt.Kt -,w::c> aww:siM1x ,+4:x u no w«i ..rsrcM1w 14;1$4,rhu+,x+r+++lx�m 4ra.F.�w' wnx n�M`xr.'M�VNaFU%±W,r+r�.�y i iq �rj"' } p 4/ ,y,. �ICyq'(' ,y) yrps'dasY j[{yy . /P r �ef,iii yn y .1,t„•;,•.,gr� (0:14, .,,,,,,,r� �', � �,, �I � .J�� �,s.:;.,� � t, . , „, .. 4/ (eilf(e.,„ivy -.,/ . „,.r. ,..,,,,,,,*,,,, el., _ c,',ie;vf„,) . 1 ,f Fn1'M xyt�,Adx rvp .'1',{ ♦ ' :n>:o-a f ,wx"„�' a dsh ',i,ii i`, i,`��`r'i, A •""3 ,K 1.. "y�.. .1 °^"f ^'� ,.et y�, I r� 'arMt.""" 'yvyer�x,aWwurM+me'rurwunxntaRY:�f.;qa, /95 ( , 1 ' 1,} I 1 I ... \—,y,,,49 • ,,," , / / / I 3 I 1 ' � � -4_... ,... �-.A.Bw.`.0 -dw4•.....-wY«..✓-.}r:.n•k ...n �-«4. .," 'fly I y ', • • (S I • I l' ■ I • I FOR• • • I pm f �, ,r, �4:d0/d. "C Td �E� P. I'a/! 0._, L4 9 ,.7 0 , . , I a . tihF3EACC273E !V!,lMBEFi E74'YENSI[7t11 j' T E FPHtJNEC P L E A A L L . •• CAME Te3 SEE YOU J Wld,„tA ,.AGA WANTSHwy YOU �! w,W /yy,) } S'FI"tUR Et YO(..1t4 CALL' t 4#Y` af" iALA`1• N'dt • ww.....�........rk P n �•,, tom,". ill , { 4 tki,,,,,,,Z.,,,....„= ,.., .. 7, o o 6-2) ,., , ".fir r 8 Ny • Taps '_ FORM 0Ob • • • • I � II I I � I- I I I • h ' r r .r 4.»..,»,.•..k....,.....�.. ..1.. _r...Fr.. _.,�..r ., „ .. � .-...+......�.«t ..n....yv.+.4w h.••r...F.ldu...+,r,n.Ar .r,.,.-, ..a..� ....,..+... • i....oe.ems.as...c via nmu.'ll"*":+!k' PI.'......vem wo,rs... t®.da.4'...s+. ..s �►an " E •• / F-I I B II- A 1. • ..0.0. ,, , .. lh ,' '' '' , . , rt...,..,....,.........,........____ < I..,IN CO L NI' i'. .7z.._( - ' .1 1'4 . , , ,. ,' • I " , II 0 I I I I I . I a I . I • • ' *e• . �I C L :II . r , i iiiki[ , l''' ' . , , , , . , , . . . . , . , , . , • . , , 4 ktIzt, 4\ ., , , • • , 1. 1... ..,,7,---.4.,, , INcolL.N iv 441'1.NS■2111,71114T.'114144 74,10.•4114111,veal,vin'Otillaw velfall.4711i1),,'•-• Mark li',' , , 1 ' , , .l' , • IPARI<ING 1 NUMBER GAIN (Loss) •, • : !LINCL 111 1;III 3512 5 1' IhiCc3Lr;.IIIV' 7�i�I INtLN :.. :--1 „ ,, F'' , , , ' L , ,„,', „ I7� AA GAfN (LOSS) 7 i.t1R Vlm. warn 9.1 .�.4.a1A„ . ., .. . .�,...,dr.—'1...... L I N C � I ` , o b �W. ' ' LINCOLN II 'I3 a, OCR -- SITE 1...`E Y ELC PME \1T P` LA LI'NC0LN IV '-1 �.8 0, . LINCOLN V P H A 51'E'' , E X IS T I N G - ' :, ' '' , - ' ” • , I • r . � �'?', •;. ., a Y 'tip• ! •�.. U.' c. a" ''.i •���.�.✓may,_ • ,..w„ ..._,,.,. ...•.,.,. sue,....... �.� EXHIBIT t I;J . ;. , I '1 •.'7.- r iNvt:;;:a. .l va.mo..a. neiun r► uln� u �rr rum E1erMY m ► i J . .. .'•-• rs., - w L.'■\ p , 111 . IIII IIIII I ( III I iii I I _____,..._........._.........., , i , , . . r. ,i � / y � 14 ► III 11IiIiIIIIIJIIIIL 1II ,\ d ... . s —LINCOLN f `�' I I f I ( I Hit I I I I I I IN --71i a , --- ..._ SHAI1ED 8Yi LINCOLN 1I1 AND V !. i , ,H. • I 1 I' iIilIl'lIi1IiiIIIiII ` t C7,1 ..�.717 1 �; \--171-11111 1 I'II( 1 I II 11 f:I I I I� 11 L/ /, • r , I 1.i _ llialcioLllz,, `-�---- - y ��--? 1 I . I I i r 1 �. I II I G -�� l p I II I»I ► 1 ! l 1 I 11l I i i LINCOLN III L.-- Iss, i ! t I I f r—41 L\ \--,_1. - 1.--- ---3---- -'—'---1— —T--- : 1 —.. <\ i / LINCOLN! I r 1 _H ;. F R ' • r 1 il .B" ( , \ 1 1 --+-..-: 1 .....iliry--r .......L....... ......_ . ., , --i--- . . , t t » i, .., it�Y .IMIEr\�:.OIY'^'»��`I'•t�El� . .t�,r �. 1 . . I N C O L' 1 1 Li .r..., , �' 4 ; 1 PARKING NUMBER GAIN • x ., , . y f r Ii 1.OS5 I LINCO i ! ING (7Lhi 111 325" (71 �� .., 1 LINCOLN 1V 775 0 1• I LINCOLN V 369. 369 / . t T0TAL, , '178�t?. �J 0 7 I 1 5 1!T'E A R E A C A I i�l i s J b 0 l LINCOLN II 1370400 0 I„ I . ! LINCOLN III ''131 5001 (38,00QQ) 1 • " W SITE DE V EL P E \ T PLA I , LINCIbLN IV 140,00,0 0 1 LINCOLN V 129},0o 38,000 , ; 'a - -----, — -...r 14,,;,._A_L , . . , . t.:pie . . .\... • ., . , . . , • . . . , , , . . . . . ) „ . , , `a •y , • • • •` i,,...1'...�w,......+-M-.-vx ':,:,=t:«va=.u+..uw..4,u,........l,u�.,w..r,..r.x.a:..w•... ;i ,.......4,.:•:„....,..„.„,,,::„:::::::::::„.•,.....;;;,:::::::::::::::.;•,::::,„ i4 .r . :.r'r.. Vi '�• ±s d l a:;, I. i •i icy: 'r ti d. . :,•; ':•r J' i t • H • , I , ., d ! d. t• c,;,,.•ill'• sr r.;:;:,;: i 2. r• ",.� !: fr' •• • . a"• I /':p ;i •• •:•r.:•. •::« ••:5.4,,•1:1••• ••.i'«• kg.:.:::#•••••••••••.X.:. •••:••••■•:•••••••■•••••••■••••••••••: 1 {J• (:''•••..'" • •I I i t f is r :1,:::•: Il :i••: ii :::::7 ! � :•Y••«:«:iii:♦' . i• J r •eff 1•, . ., ' I N C O'L N IV :i i«' .. ,..•rte.•-u, �„ t ' ''".."...9 ' NUMBER GAIN (L055.)K PARKING N L i N LJ C�L N X111 325 1 a LINCOLN III 311 (1 4) . LINCOLN IV `, . L I 1 IC K�'LI i� 1J o ' o.. SITE AttUA QA,°I„, rTLb 's5) _. I 155 8011 224, 800 1. i LIPJCC�Lt�I I r DEVELOPMENT PII tiiii,N, 0 L `t (I V ii 41 $ 10 o N „ ,I 1' I i I o • ;.;,;t EXHIBIT D � rr :! i ::••::✓::::::✓iii::•• 111✓✓✓ •t• 1:, . ..'....':':',:.: ''''..''' :,;,..4.1/4..,--1.1.-:.,'...'::,>',-,-..‘..; i; :e. • 'mot' •+. �r:%.tip'.�':::• •.l i. r�.j ,v,•,....•.•..: •.' .• I., •.'::•: :+•.•tom✓r.".':".•o.":•::•:•`••.". •j� :'i' . f:ti^. .t. i:j•. der': ti:'r:. 4: t,• .JS Y'. Yi)• •J rin :•r: y ✓:✓ •'n. i'.'..,r•, •:•:ti'•i�j•' !•:s•?{::::_.;.;:jyyn, } ::i: '•l.:•:•:ter. :�.+:••ti• ••^:•:•::• �•.,.or;.,.•r..•. ....r.• f+�r"' .. •• •:�•l:t i spa,..•• • i.L•.: ;1.:• ::::• •`••••a••••••••••••:.•::•:•::i:. ••i•...•• • ■ ••• ii•,••••••••:••:••::✓.:••• i • • • • 1, . 1•r Y, : ;••••,,:t•:'::::..!..••••••••:::::,...:::::.:•••:•••••1 . .. 11 �' INCOLN I / ' NilPARKING NUMBER CAIN (LOSS) L1NCoL ! 111, 31 (14) III. I LINCOLN 5 LINCOLN IV' 775 (9) ,. LINCOLN V t�. o TOTAL� ! 517E AREA GAIN (LOSS) -' LINCOLN II ' 137 400 (18,400) ., L 1 N C o + N 111 ` 6 LINCOLN IV 140:000 (80000) , LINCOLN{ V 91 500 61i5°° PHASE ; nu T ,, . ` ■ c ..._ .._. , -, ..�.._.,• - ... �...._.._..........___. _...�._ ,...�. .m._...<.i.�..»u w,. _,_._.._. . ., . .,,,+.....,..�w,..c...�....�,..�.:�....a..u.:'::..-..w.-,........i,.,,w.,.:�»...,.w...a..,..en..,�,-..,..k....+.�.,;.. ' r wRn.'rewa wtlu.w wm..�r�,wee•.--- aal� i .0". a►'hu...,�>r,amre,�n+..a'w�ar ywr wry em r'lm+umomP iart, w� I J , 0 ,„.„ . r l i i� \ I • .l ll � ll lll ; s �l!T1i � s, illl 'Illl �illl , ,./. 1 I PjniitLpii ; insniiunf ' t '1 ! ' / ' ) iTril I1If lI ill 1 -� LINCOLN Y �! I I, { I f I 1. 1 II',hi 'l l l I f r I l f 1 1 i ! i f ',Y ` • I i 1 ..,__.•. � ,,. ', I I it! I I l I 111 l,I 111 I II f l I •,� � SHARED BY: LINCOLN ill AND �t_:.�1 J . . f f , ,, Iii � i�ll Il � i � l � l / / r s ,:� .;,,��'; �� \,► I I11 1111 !U 11 '; ' 1111111 1 1 i_/ -,- 1' 1 r I. ' far• rr. �I �� , '_•_•' , ,.A I i i i 1 \.;"'i--a.._.....------- , �.,. ' 1 I t i G I Jj i r i i i i 1 i i i 11 i i i i i `� .. , ' a r-----7------'1- �_.---7------'1- .•=.,,-- f i I-i*1 ;•t I.ri' i.l 1:j it i i'j i 1, f i.j� 1 i" • . f. �1� 1,1111 I . ,. 1 2 -1---._ __:---1 1 ...__ __\__:_iit Ill 11111 ! I I ./ \ • ' ' i• ..... -----,...7.--------..,....„..q.---.010--------;-----ezar--a-- ,,t 4 1 \\/,. e' . ' . / \ 1 1 i 1 i ��.: O" / r i ,� ; --•-r ti t, ,f i i -- 1 . I i C, I 1 1 I JV r t N, r+�.i..•.... ter..+.. I "'.—•� r' B • I j, i , r, ..,,.... .• ...........Ailib4VE.A.MiNaing,11.4•MelliokeialF.111114.116 Bahl ,1 'PARIGING NUMBER. 'GAI `,4411.' r ' ' i I k LO !N_\\\\7._f_j14- 1 l "�� I �, 1 ,LINCOLN II 31 '1. r' i LiNC( LN 1Ii 3�5 (2,11') 1;, iiNC?L'N v 39 3 '69 , I i TOT:A). 1 780 r '' ' 1 ' SITE AREA G� I N 1 1 IY Q'. I `,LI ■ COLN II 137.,4400 0 !' " SITE DEVEL � T L , L I N C O L N Iv 14 0,,,0 tl'0 ,l , „ 'LINCOLN 'V 129, 500 1, 3800 ' ; . I• 5 r •I ! - ._.wM � � � X, „ ,.. �.', ,,..�, � � .., �.r,i,. rmr_.�,...t...i.,.r....,.�._w.r....,u.ra.cn.,r.....,r.,_..r r.w—...-.u,.�.wu•:dte.r .i.Fv......•,.•.... i r �r„l..•rn.s,,..4..a,u'1«m«s.:,.:xwv,Jn'w+1..:-'+,Ik«'.41 4w::.ikl?r.:•..«uhauuaw,..�..-,..r, ,.,. «a.., • 1 ff( 41. r • .: J ....e . , . .. , :. , . 1 ., , (, ,.... - , . . . EXHIBIT 1 B , 1., . . 1 1,.,.:' FOUR LINCOLN CENTER DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND VARIANCE I. 1 • • I I ':I ' ' r April 15, 19871 k, r „, tl r r 1 t Tramiel Crow Compahy� l' i 1 P.O. Bose 5396 i ' Portland, Oregon 97228 I is 1 ' 1, 1 a ,,M ckenzie/Saitn & Assoc7ates, P.C. ,,Mackenzie Ehgi eering Incorporated i 0690 S.W. Bancroft Street 1 11 Potlan , Oregon 97201 03) 229870 r, ' I I I A, M , 1 k 1 f. � � • i • .• I. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL: •u h Y' This is a proposal for Site Development Review for the fourth phase of, the Lincoln Center office complex. The proposal includes administrative variances 1) to allow a buildinig of 176 feet in height; 2) to provide up to 45% compact Parking spaces; height; p p p 9 P and 3) to allow compact parking spaces 8 feet in width. • The existing phases of Lincoln Center were approved by Washington County, in • several separate applications which applied the "Office Commercial" zone and specific Development Reviews. Two pending Land Use applications in the County will allow portions of the parking for this project to be constructed: a. A Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Zone Change for three parcels' in the south ea st corner o f t he site, to change the designation to Office Commercial; and b. A Special Use permit for four parcels at the intersection of S.W. Lincoln Street and S.W. Locust Street for parking in the R-5 zone. Since the site has been recently annexed to the City 'of Tigard, the City will consider this proposed Site Development Review and Variance Application. It is , anticipated that County zoning will be changed to the City zoning prior to approval , of the proposal. • This phase of Li ncoln Cent er will include about 200,000 gross sq• ft, of building . area, in a single building of 13 stories.. Within this area, approximately 8,000 sq. ft. of service retail space will be provided (within the first floor of the building) . Parking will be provided in surface lots, plus a three story parking structure, totaling 713 spaces. This project will continue the extremely successful concepts of the first three phases of Lincoln Center, with high quality "Class A" space and ;amenities. • The project, as proposed, meets all dimensional and use standards of the Ii �� , Commercial/Professional zone, except as noted above. .. • II. DISCUSSION OF THE PROPOSED HEIGHT VARIANCE: This proposed vari • height limitation of the " " allow the propose' variance to the ' .� �mi tati on o e CN zone will e proposed building to be built to a maximum of 176 feet above the adjacent finished �� �7 �� ent� "nished grade, plus the mechanical penthouse, while the Code requirement is 45 feet. Building height . ., hey ht is a function o f .a number umber of f act ors that contribute• to the , de cis ion making process. These include t he economics of floor area as a function , o building footprint, building code provisions With respect to construction requirements for building heights, site characteristics, adjacent land Uses, and the abi l i t to p rovi de sufficient on-s i to parking and landscaping. Each of these is discussed below. • • • • • Floor Area with Respect to Footprint An analysis of site development must consider the amount of building floor area that is both necessary to allow an economically feasible project, and possible based upon site conditions and the need for ancillary uses. In this case, it will be, noted from a review of the accompanying site plan that the area of the footP p rint of the proposed building is about th e same as the e footprint area of Two Lincoln',Center and. Three Lincoln Center. The owner's analysis has shown, however, that additional floor area is needed for an • economically feasible project, based upon current land costs and market • conditions° Therefare, in order to increase floor area, while maintaining necessary„ parking' and landscaping, the height must be increased. On-Site. Ancillary Uses An appropriate amount of on-site vehicular parking, plus landscaping, is necessary for a project a nd to mee t Zoning g Code requirements. remn nts. Since parking, within a structure is much more costly than surface parking, a ' balance must be achieved between structured parking, surface parking, and floor area. The amount of parking that can be provided establishes the total , floor area that be accommodated on a 'site.' Buildin q Code Provision The Uniform Building Code has special fife and safety provisions for buildings over 75 feet in height which 'includes requirements for water storage (for sprinklers) pressurized stair wells and Type I FR construction. In addition to Code issues, once 6 floors or approximately 75 ft. is exceeded, vertical R transportation system efficiency must be increased, Which'requires substantial • cost increases. The cost of these additional requirements is such that a 7 or 8 story building is not economically feasible, since the additional costs • cannot be distributed over enough floor area to justify the expenditure for life and safety, and transportation systems. These costs directly affect the market position of the building. Without sufficient square sq q uare f ootag g e to offset the added costs, rent would exceed the, market rate. Adjacent Land Uses The proposed building is the fourth phase of Lincoln Center which, when , j h combined with adjacent Lincoln Saving and Loan bui lding and the office building Street and Nighwa. 217 . six • .g y � will make �t�one of buildings Oak close .. roximity. This lessens the impact of increasing bet een S.W. w y ld�ngs �n very p � ,This 9 he increased i _add' the need increase hey height variety interest to the�skyline,� Aesthetically, the height,} an ei , will� ncreased h adds to add varlet.to 7n, �; will provide g and � and a focal point and identification for the project.' Adjacent non-commercial land uses are also a consideration with respect to visual intrusion a nd the creation of shadows. Accompanying drawin g s .:s. h ow the e relationship of the proposed.building to the adjacent properties, and potential effec t of the proposed height with increased setback, compared to • wa • 1' • • • • • • . i III' • • the allowed 45 feet at the Code required setback. It will be seen that the small footprint and increased setback reduce the potential impact of increased height, and that no adverse impact will occur on adjacent properties. I � , III. DISCUSSION OF THE PROPOSED PARKING SIZE AND COMPACT RATIO VARIANCES: ' . The proposed variances Ge s t o the City's compact parking space size and percent of compact spaces will allow the continuation of the design standards established by the first three phases of Lincoln Center,. These standards also meet the County's' criteria, as ,noted 'by the following comparison. Cit y 0 u nt' Pro I 05 d'.I Standard size: 9'-0" x 18'-0" 8' -6 x 18'-0" g'„0" x 18'-0" Compact size: 81 -6" x 15'-0" 7' -6" x 15'-0" 8'-0" x 15'-0" Percent compact: 25% 50% 45% rl Trammell C r ow s experience in the operation of the existing phases of Lincoln Center shows that the size and proportion of compact spaces allows an efficient site design both in terms of function of the prarking facility and in the I .. availablity of adequate area for landscaping. The continuation of this design EI will provide an appropriate number of spaces while maintaining an acceptable overall parking facility. IV. REVIEW OF VARIANCE CRITERIA: Section 18,134.050 of the City Development Code provides several criteria which must be met by a proposed variance. Each is addressed as follows; f Criteria 1 "The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this Code, be in conflict with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan, to any other applicable policies and standards; and to othr properties in the same zoning district or vicinity. Comment: t proposal must be viewed as an integrated grated des i gn� The. total site development - us t� ��� for a thorough evaluation with respect to Code purposes ; and Plan policies. Generally, it is the intent Codeto ovide for office in environment . . ndu to Development �, Plan and I e business, as ° �����abo e b provide conducive o well as compatible with {. . �I + areas.i described Y 91, wi th respect to building n height,�ai�patki _ pith adjacent a ' As ,the decision respect swell as parking design, is the result of ; . . I a complex analysis of many factors. t �..s the overall intent'o project ect aestablish a high quali y environment, compatible 1e h �lts surroundings, ; which is also the p urpose of the developm ent code'. The specific basis for the requested variances is discussed in following sections. I I yt • • It should also be noted that Section 18.98 of the Development Code allows . building height to be increased to 75 feet, provided that certain criteria are met. Although the 75 foot limit is not sufficient to allow the proposed project, a review of the criteria is beneficial to an understanding of the ' proposaL . "The total floor are of the building does not exceed one and v` one half the area of the site;N As noted above, the F.A.R. of the project is less than 1:1. 4 The yard dimensions in each case are equal to at least one , half of the building height of the principal structure;" The yard dimension, at approximately 220 feet, is 1.25 times the building height. "The approval of this exception is a part of the approval of the conditional use 'allowed under Chapter 18.13O; ( " This project does not otherwise require a conditional use; the proposed variance is included in the Site Development Review process. The structure is not abutting a residential zoning district.'" In addition to the substantial setback, there is a public right-of-way between the proposed structure and residential • districts. • Criteria 2: "There are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the applicant has no control, and which are not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district." BUilding_±.1fiAlltcOMMent •, The proposed project is the fourth phase of Lincoln Center and will include the last area with office development potential west of S.W. Lincoln Street. • The character of the area, as noted above, is an intensive office commercial center, which it a node of activity in this portion of Washington County, • The opportunity for developmtnt of this site to the maximum extent pOsstble, based upon site and development conditions, will allow completion of the pattern of development already established. pile' 4 • . , • • As described above, the decision with respect to building height is the result of a complex analysis of economics, land potential, and Code consideration. • The result is a balance of economic feasibility, potential return on Thvestment, the provision of a complete site development package and the impact of Code consideration. in this this case, the decision to construct a relatively high building is influenced largely by the potential to increase floor area, while utilizing a relatively small building footprint to preserve - , - the maximum site area. , A • This site is unique in the area due to its proximity to the existing office . uses and ability to be developed as part of this complex. The height variance will allow its development in a manner consistent with these uses, and nearly to the same intensity. The actual F.A.R. (floor to area ratio), after development of the fourth phase as proposed, will be .76:1 or about a 17% increase above the existing level of development (.63:1) . This increase is negligible in terms of potential impact, and represents significantly less building area than allowed in mixed use areas such as John's Landing (City of Portland-Macadam Plan District) which allows up to a 2:1 F.A.R. Lark;nIllariarice Comment: The proposed variances to the compact size and proportion standards will allow the continuation of design standards currently employed in the existing phases of the project, and which would be allowed under the. applicable County zoning. ' This proposal, therefore, explicitly meets this criteria since these design standards are necessary to allow the fourth phase to be completed in a manner comparable with the earlier phases. Criteria 3: "The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this Code and City standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible, while permitting some economic use of the land;ll Comment: • The proposed office building and associated parking are allowed by the CP zone. The intensity of the development, as indicated by the Floor Area RatiO described above, is consistent with the existing development of the first three phases of the project as well as with the CP zone. The economic aspects of the project are described above. Criteria 4: "Existing physical ad natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic land forms or parks will not be adversely affected any more than would occur if the development were located as specified in the Code " P-4,1,1g • • Bui1ding�Height Comment: . The proposed building has bee n designed as a n integral element of the Lincoln Center office complex, with access, circulation, parking, and landscaping i', designed to enhance the entire site Accompanying drawings indicate that the building will be situated approximately 220 feet from the nearest property line, which is the westerly limit of the proposed Lincoln Street extension. Therefore, the building will be about 280 feet from the closest non-office zoned property. #, ' An analys i s of he i gh t with respect to setback indicates that the increased setback will reduce the potential impact of the building height. Further, the small footprint, compared to what would be required if the 45 foot limit ` were maintained, will actually assure a reduction of impact on adjacent properties, including shadow patterns. Parking_ Variance Comment ,r • The proposed parking design criteria have functioned adequately on the.exi sting first three phases of Lincoln Center, and no adverse effects on adjacent properties have been identified. An inspection of the existing parking area shows that it is aesthetically pleasing and functionally' appropriate, thereby indicating that its continuation meets this criteria. ./ Criteria 5 "The hardship is not self-imposed and the variance requested is the minimum variance which' Would alleviate the hardship." Bui,l,di Height. Comment The hardship in this case is specifically related to the ability of this site to be developed in a manner commensurate with adjacent properties, while providing adequate parking and landscaping and protecting abutting non ' commercial uses. The height standard of the Code is base d upon an arbitrary assumption, without the benefit of the type of analysis which has been prepared for this property. The absolute height he g ht of the proposed building is not as important as its relationshi p to adjacent land uses and oonpatibility with , dissimilar activities: is for the hardship. No personal circumstances are cited as the �bas,` or Parking V a.ri ante Comment sue with respect the variance and this similar The is ct to thA parking varia criteria is y '' p p rsonal hardships e the to the comment noted above. No Pe condition. a The owner has found that � the n proposal and they would h consistent nt justify existing he is not intended to �ust�f an ex7stin con o the proposed standards are ppropr` ate, y ave been cons lste with the applic y g retained. able' criteria if the Count. zoning had been r ' (»a:n.� .. '. ,.....,»i,.,t..x.......,-w..-m-..,...a._....,w.,,..,M.,...w.,.:,.-: .._-.,.-,.lwa. ....,-......k:_..,r,»..,.. w—.......•,+..a.w.w.,.:....._Iw....u.:,.�....:4.:......._.-+..:+rr...l.1 u.,... <..—.... ..,.. , .. .. .a......,.,,.,-...........a•,-a-,..M«.-.Y.:«u.w...:t.t..aa�w. ww-:r4...-a s,..r... y IV. SIt 4MY• This proposed Development Review 4„nd Variance package has been prepared after a thorough analysis of the various factors that determine floor area, footprint and . building height. proposal h i �t. The has been found to be both economically feasible • P and consistent with the character of the existing development in the area. The variance criteria, as addressed,above, are,met by the proposal when the project is viewed as an integrated package. H • r , {{ it rr • dtaap�, ' • t ..wu!M w:•t....,a:.:;,•A=..._.y4�..a.F;.,.x.«aF.:,.:»A., ■ ,.:„..r_ i-f4:.lr;+.w. .... m.u.:,.:..:::4�•,...«..,-i.w...ti.,w...:+.:,-',„»,.::.,....w_. »,,.,..,»•-.MM..,,.A.',tsa:;.i,u.a:.;a_,.,,:.«A,.-a.:...i.:'m. ,.•—«.ro.r..`.,...f...M.,»w.....,.,,.M.-..... + ..., .,..„..w..,.....1..•a1Fa«,.r..,ti:.u, QUEST FOR COMMENTS TO: klatilinte..14 .DATE: May 5, 1989 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SDR 89-12 LINCOLN CENTER FIVE For approval of a Site Development tc:view request to construct a 125,000 square foot office building with a two-to- . five story parking garage at Lincoln Center. ZONE: C-P (Commercial Professional) LOCATION: 10260 SW Greenbu'rg Road ( WCTM 181 35AB, tax lot 1:002 j Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Maly .5, 1989. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to e ' return your comments. If you are, unable to respond by the. aboye datge please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Deborah Stuart - 639--4171 PLEASE�CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. _ Please re f er to the enclosed letter. Co Written mments: w\�.,��„_ t "'�i,,,r . LAI � J 3 G (�,}..,s, �C- ...' 1. V.r;1• - ' .n..x.1 :4,,,,,,_ '. .. Ma me of Perso n Commenting: ;-* Phone umber; ����� `� �� - � � � DB..- i. .BKM b�n�5 R q 2 • 4 r >w. .x..r'.l,.t,:.l.f»»».-I.....iflMr..+................Arx.w..-...-....w.............AL.i.w......w.....+-,•. m«r.,......"...r.F:rHw M....I........—m 4...1... «.A......k. ..i.......i...+1..ma....m....,..,..,...1.�A.+n+n»+-..+rnnF.k,V:rn F ..».+nrA.n w.W--.-FLla......»r..-Hw..,n�L..�..wx+..h'.-11nw.i.........a-rv.iAn.::l.w-r•..r...yi:h L.»u4Aw..... .u...w..+.... m • REQUEST FOUR COTS TO: DATE: May 5, 1989 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SDR 89-12 LINCOLN CENTER FIVE For approval of a Site Development Review request to construct a 125,000 square foot office building with a two-to- ' garage at Lincoln Center. ZONE: C-P (Commercial five story parking ' garag Professional) LOCATION: 10260 8W. Greenburg Road ( WCTM 1S1 35AB, tax lot 1002) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other . information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by May 15, 1989. 1 You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to r eturn your comments. �f ou are unable to respond above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your , comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO nox 23397, 13125 SW gall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Deborah Stuart 639--4171 PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections it. , I , Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. • Written Comments r"rte-t' - ✓�' -''' �.�""' 40,.:...et e— _Ad I , Natrte of Person Commenting : !r�'taie : 'o' :.ice:a- :, -,.. Commenting: At pa Phone Number, _ 6.4,5)1___ • bkm/SDR89-312.BKM' . I .I I I I I I I I II I I I I I , . • , ' J ...no...,,-.,...4+.:...........:..4..w. ',�I s^n,..r,.:.:...,.n,..,..r.,....L:f...w.a x.... a..,.. ,._..44...44444_.:.,....4_.4,4...—,4.—,4 -- --n...,,.1e..,..44.i4F.,.i�"aw4.;+...i- 1.....t..n:;i:..:a.niw,.aw.:r�„-Y.,..-at..,... REQUEST EST FUR COMMENTS V or TO: 3: �' DACE: Max 5. 1989 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SDR 89-12 LINCOLN CENTER FIVE For approval of a Site Development Review request to construct a 125,000 square foot office building with a two-to- five story parking garage at Lincoln Center. ZONE: C-P (Commercial • Professional) LOCATION: 10260 SW Greenburg Road ( WCTM 151 35A8, tax lot 1002) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future, • If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by May 15, 1969. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If y�au are unable to respond by the above date, pleaate phone the Staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Bail Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Deborah Stuart - 339.-4171 PLEASE CHECK THD F OLLO O ITEMS THAT APPLY: W e have reviewed the proposal and ha ve no ob jections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. ._.. a r� Written Comments- - • Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number:, I;l, L bkmf SDRt39 -1.2.18EM a.'.::.j d..f".,:W,_,«w..,w.. ,JAL ;i, w..M....aa.;..�.nla.i.w.�Mi..,.�..._.......,_....n..M .,...,� .,�,..,. I,,.........i'.::»..,....,,. ��.,,.+,...v-J.-.,..a«W,r.:�..� ......,..;:..a':.a.J..,,..,. +»:r......._,:.r.;-....:iz;-_.,.,..u:,.....:u�.:;.:a.:a Y+S:.il.:......._..,...a..»,..,......t,..�a..._u....:r.,t...-,::.;!:ti..tw....1:u.:..:1..._.:..�, �. • 1 7 1. Make, as a condition of approval, no construction is to take place from 9:00 pm to 7:00 am. 2. Require that off street parking be provided for all construction worker vehicles. 3. Require that all construction materials be stored on site. • 4. Require that flagmen be provided when construction vehicles are l' blocking public streets. e , I r C.. + l • • I 4' I I I , "..... :.. ,.',....,,,:,.,.,� ..,,....„... ..,.,... ..,....I.. ...... .............................,.,......,.,., ...,.,•,,..,,,.�. .r.� ,.,..,.,- .., ..,,., „r„ ., �.,,.,.a ..,,.,�.,,,...•.,.....,,v.,�..,.,...,,.,«...«„ ,�,.,..,.,,,.,�..,..,,,�.�, .,.,�„ .r, ,,,,,,, .,.,.� 'w - .u...u._...,-...,:,+:', ._...»..,.i -.:u.......:..h:.•..:.w»,:..._........:..[;......._a ' J;,,:.C:..u::,�...:..k.4-u+-i�........ o MAY 12 1,989 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: May 5 TO: ` � ..� r '�d l Cam TE. 5, 1989 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SDR 89-12 LINCOLN CENTER FIVE For approval of a Site Development Review request to construct a 125,000 square foot office building with a two-to- five story parking garage at Lincoln Center. ZONE: : :C-P (Commercial, ' sion' Greenburg WCTM 1S1 35 lot • Professional) LOCATION: 10260 SW Gre urq Road AB, tax 1©02) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review, From r'" , information supplied by various , departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a , report and recommendation will be } prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. ; If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by May_11, 1989. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to 1 ', return your comments. If ,you' are unable to' respond by'the above date please h' phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding l ' this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box. 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 9'6223. PHONE: 639--4171. STAFF CONTACT: Deborah Stuart * 639-4171 , PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: _ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. , enclosed letter. e �. to the n Please refer Written Comments: 3 • Name of Person commenting: : Phone Number: :: b m/SDRB9-12.Bl • .-... ,.f.............R... .....0..„ i.s.. ...A.rw.- .«, i,.'J r1,.....r,i:a.;.. ,....«., RECEIVED MAY 101989 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO:-JPLACI.172Atfl '.cr 'Q t DATE: ......._May 5 1959 _ r FROM: Tigard. Planning Department RE: SDR 89-12 LINCOLN CENT' TIVE For approval of a Site. Development Review request to construct a s; 5,000 square, foot office building with a two-to- five story parking garage at Lincoln Center. ZONE: C-P (Commercial Professional) LOCATION: 10260 SW Greenburg Road ( WCTM 151 35AB, tax lot 1002) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's° statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available . to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by May 15, 1989. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. I ou are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the , staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your (,. comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions rega.a.:LiLtg . this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW , Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Deborah Stuart - 639-4171 PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: and have objections 3 We have reviewed the proposal e no ob'e gns'to it. • Please contact of our office. " k Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments • Natmme of Person Commenting: Phone 'Number: bkin/SDR89.12.I ° 7 . • • ,.-....».....4...,,....u.».��..:..cu.-....,�..,-..,a.,JV'F.w,i.-,w�M......�',-..:«-,,..«11•.,.�ir...a,>.,:w-.rr�h�a: .»..,.�.....a»,:..•......u.i..«.....1.wu.w,.�::..,:w..w.,C-4•-�....a-Y....::,.'.J-. o-w' 4:.:'i.,.�:......H..-,.a„n.......,, wawi.A.....'...�J.k”n.+:...,-.....U..,,.,l il....+-.w...,.-+..o.wJ:w.w«-«.......-....'-or...a. .. r'ICT 2-A REQUEST FOR COMMENTS MAY 8 1 TO: � . S l7 lC5l/a DATE: Ma 5 1989 IN � � � • FROM: Tigard Planning Department •SDR 89-12 LINCOLN CENTER FIVE For approval of a Site Development Review request to construct a 1250000 square foot office building with a two-to- five story parking garage at Lincoln Center. ZONE: C-P (Commercial. Professional) LOCATION: 10260 SW Greenburg Road ( WCTM 1S1 35AB, tax lot 1002) r Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our Staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will, be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you. wish .to comment on this application, we need your comments by May 15, 1989. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. Cf 'you. aro unablm to res.ond b the above date please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, Contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, /3125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, or 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: (,_,Deborah Stuart �.639-4171 R��1i N6 min 10 A8 ' PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS TRZT APPLY: WIti • We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. r . Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments • I I Name of Person Commend I I Phone Numberi 20.2 S' C �,: _. • A b + S'DR$9 12 gKM , 1 I / .4«.M.,..N..:. . ,..1.:.V,�w�-.,¢....w,.....JU.,+r«.MI...me:.+v.-».... M•.....x.., : ........ •«.,+ •_w:�.i...,„r.,.i�. v� .-..m n._.ix::.. ,..,,.i•,...+.,, t1 .' • ' ,..c'..w..w-r-.-Gw.l..,.,:-....u!_;.1..,.n,.,,•,,,.,.•.,.,..i..:..........»,.,,.,r.�::.,:t+,M-...,....-.,..,.w..,....,.w..:...».nww-+.aai,M.uw.,-....,,,_ . ' { �, • ! f• 1 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS s\ii...TO:: �'e 4�;, t.cJ DATE:: Mav ,5, 1989 9 5 9 ' FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SD t 89-12 LINCOLN CENTER FIVE 1 For approval of a Site Development Review i , ', request to construct a 125,000 square, foot office building with a two-to-` • five story parking garage at Lincoln Center. ZONE: C-P (Commercial . Professional) LOCATION: 10260 SW Greenburg Road ( WCTM 151 351x3, tax lot , 1002) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From' • • information supplied by various departments and, agencies and from other ' information available to our staff,I. a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be 'rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by .y. 15, t 1989. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to • • return your com►nents. xf o ' yu are unable to res.ond' b the above date please "' phone the staff contact noted. below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as Boon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW : • . Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PRONE: 639--4.171. . STAFF CONTACT: Deborah Stuart 639 -4171 • PLEASE CHECK. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: - X 1 We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections•to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. I 1,2, Written Commentet 1 ''''N ____Lii 4 , IA L. . - 0 L1/126-_. AA • � r_.> am yf Person Co L � { P1�one Ntirtiber I Hilt A ( b�Cm 5 � � � � � � :� �I � '�; 044, 7r�. � �Nlas�nt.i13A1 Ef�Fi . yp�F�ESCUIi��`,, ei, gtori Douro Fire District NO.1 • � I3Ft83 1.2�5�1�� City of SeaVeiion Fire Departmeht L OFFICE • ig) posit Fire s c } I ��MARSHALS. pea _ .. •- � • Vorlan 001am- in o C/b':Ph∎Orgrot,o;N SheriNonJ=- Ti and Tualatin-, WlronVtlla Gackiimai.Cour*-,W1+4,4101o(1 Colin • 9 i! � tGene�!i'i'cli►III � I � . Deputy Piro IviarshaIiPt rls Exarrtiher 00)62S-261"n 4155 s,W,Gtitilth Ofvr P.0,eo dr5 BV a bh �tl ti aN � 0 7� • ' , 'A. / ..,--....«.,.»....,..,.. ,._ wl-+.r...l l...n ._-.,.-.,i w....e_ ....I.....0.«..4....«....... ......_......_........-......,..,......,..:L.:....,..._......4 ..a.....,......,.........................a........m..l....,-,......,.» ..,.._..A.+:.' »..»...,...L............I.,Y ..,...,.....,....,..,...w....,.......a....... ..-n._...r...d.G.,-,.4+r...,..u....L.-. ....-N..u:...-iGS».. .. ' • • • • PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION FILE NO: Site Development Review SDR 89-12/Variance V 89-17 FILE TITLE: Lincoln Center Five APPLICANT: Ingrim/Mills P.Q. OWNER: Trammel Crow Co One Centerpointe Drive 10260 SW Greenburg Road Lake OSSwe g o OR 97035 Portland, OR 97223 I I I i , n' REQUEST.e For approval Hof a Site Development Review request to '.construct a 125,000 s qu are foot offi ce building wi th a twos-to- five story pa rkin g garage at Lincoln Center. LOCATION: 10260 SW Greenburg Road (WCTM 1S1 35 AB lot 1002) ZONING DESIGNATION: C'-P (Commercial Professional) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial Professional NPO NO: 8 CHAIRPERSON: Marjory Haglund PHONE: 639-4407 �II x STAFF DECISION PLANNING COMMISION DATE / / TIME . . _ HEARINGS OFFICER DATE / /r� TIME _: � •�„ CITY COUNCIL DATE / / TIME _ : .xw REQUEST FOR COMMENTS (See attached list) RETURN BY M_/_/ ATTACHMENTS: x VICINITY MAP �,x_, LANDSCAPING PLAN x NARRATIVE x ARCHITECTURAL PLAN x SITE PLAN (all together( . in a spiral notebook with a . set of plane) STAFF CONTACT PERSON: Deborah Stuart PREPARE FOR PLANNER APPROVAL: 1 .. 1 ry 2 5 RT ISO PROPERTYIOWNlCRS TO BE IAA CJREGONIAN �/�/' X__ NOTICE T. -- .., /AILED _6 / 2 /85 x LETTER OF ACCEPT or APPLICATION { NOTICE TO DLCD ATTAC.. �. �. �. HME2JTS: I II I , I I � I I I • i��irs M.. . �.. -....w... 4. w. ._M ". h•,, ,F..,�_.c, a ,r mow..,.. r„ VIII • of [" LINCOLN FIVE TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY I, I I � I TABLE OF CONTENTS BASIC MATERIALS: Team List T Cover Letter/Project 2. Application With Authorized Signature 3 . Title, Transfer llnstrum is 4. Assessor's Map 5. Site Plans (See Exhibits A-G, enclosed .,1 � 6. Applicant's Statement (Project Description) a. Development Schedule I , b. Materials Description 7 . List Of Property oWners With Addresses (Within 250 ft. 1 Of Project) fi Summary Of O p tio ns For Parkan g Garage Configuration 1 (Exhibits B & C) SPECIFIC MATERIALS: Application Checklist �.. A. SITE INFORMATION 1. Vicinity Map (See Echibit A) 1 w Size 2. Site �S�:ze And Dimensions (See Exhibit A D) 3. N.A. L � 1' 4 . Drainage Patterns (See Exhibit O-D' ` 6. N.A. f I 7. Free Survey (See Exhibit A) 8. odation Of Existing A • i And Their t n Strti otuf'es Tse: (See Exhibit A) ..u • � I I 10. Location Of Existing g Utz� .ai t ies A nd Easements: (See e i Exhibit :D � , I . f 11. Location Of Existing Dedicated Right-Of-Ways: (S ee Exhibit A) B. SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS 1. The Proposed Site And Surrounding Properties: (See L. Exhibits A-D) 2 . Contour Lines Intervals I 3 . Locations Of Streets An d Other Public is Ways (See Exhibits A-D) 4. Location And Dimensions Of: a. Enterances & exits on site: (see exhibits A-D) Parking & circulation areas: (see exhibits b. (ee A--D) (traffic study) c. Loading & services areas: (see exhibits B-D) d. Pedestrian circulation: (see exhibits B-D) t 5. Existin g Permanet Structures: (See Exhibit A) a. Proposed structures: (see exhibits B-D) 6. Storm Drainage Facilities And Analysis Of Down- Stream Conditions (See Exhibits C-D) , Engineers Report) 7. Sanitary Sewer Facilities (See Exhibit D) 8. Areas To Be Landscaped: (See Exhibit C-D) Location Lighting (Submitted on And Type Of Outdoor Lignt�.ng' (Sub Separately) 10. N.A. 11. Existing Site Considerations (See Exhibits A-D) C. GRADING PLANS: N.A. D. ARCIiZTECTURAL DRAWINGS: (Slit EXHIBIT d E d°, 1. Floor Plans f ' I } • 2 . Euilding Elevation E. LANDSCAPE PLAN: (SEE EXHIB T D) x a 1. Irrigation System 2. Location And 3'..sights Of Fence SP Buffers And screen .ngs. . I • • .,_..«...�M...«,.u..a-....r.,:�.,...v_d.,. n..«N.,�.',.« ..+«_ «...,., ••._..•_». .II,..�..v GM�:,,««p.,.. • ..,:�.0»H»..�r,.......:.�.1.•.-,L.. ....•..,� :Rkw:.r.,'».,.........,...,,_-.-..�.m4:..�w.. .........a.....J.w.,.,..r..wm.7..,a,..�a,,....»,.,.w,:,—,.W..«'�.«,.,«a•I�.a.rUU:w' .. wi.14.c-.:•„-..�.w»fia..,.. • 3. AV•A. 4. Proposed Planting Schedule (Submitted Separately) I I ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE APPLICATION • 1• The Request 2. Supporting Narrative I , I I I I I • • I I I I I I , ' I I I I I I I I 1 , I I I I { I Y' I I ' w 4.. • c ,.,la„».... .............,i;,im...,.-1...,, .:,I,..0,,..;, !.w.,,...1.:.....,1 ...,.a...1.;._...,.., .«,.,,..-..,,., w»...Y.'a.,n:.:.1...-,...il.m,w. ,,...:.a..._..,.«,. .,.+,7:r ,;.wwY,,..-..,..�.....,..1.4.u.M ..,..,.,;.4--I::nxu-.,',MI,..,...-- ..:.ra:l,'u.a:., ♦.'r'.,.w;,a:.t—,«,M.✓.,..u.,,a.:«....xa.,.,-„e.":;.:,,.G.....,uw,l,i..:.:l..w.,.... • • PROJECT SUMMARY The Trammell Crow Company proposes to construct a seven story, i 129, 000 square foot Office Tower, and a two or five level parking garage to be located adjacent to the existing Lincoln Buildings, to the east of Washington, Square (See exhibit A, Existing Building Sites) . The proposed building wi, ll be sited wi t inanexisting P a k in g Tot directly north of Lincoln 3, and is bordered on the north by Locust Street, l east to Lincoln Street, south to Lincoln 3 , and west of the parking. As the subject building displaces existing parking, there is a proposed two or five level parking garage to the east or southeast of the building, depending on the scheme. Accompanying this site development application request will be a variance request for modifications to the height limitations, in order to, achieve the relative heights of surrounding projects. Please note Exhibit "G" which demonstrates the relati ie heights of adjacent Lincoln Buildings. A. I , evecm e21t Schedule D 1 Construction of the proposed midrise building is antiui ated to begin in early summer of 1989 with completion expe cte d b y II late winter of 1989. B. MatOrials Description Tt e r midrise building will be a post tensioned concrete structure clad in brick p anels of Similar color, and common materials of the surrounding Lincoln Buildings. The window system be ,solar gray glazing anodized will glazing set In aluminUm frames, similar to systems currently ' employed on Lin coln Tower. a garage 1The accompanyin g parking w� L be of concrete in . structure with brick to existing Lincoln Towers . st Eck ;�nf�.11� panels,� �similar the existin parking garage supporting� Lz�ic I I I I C. oxri.. fiance With community_jitvel.a code . f I I I I k I • V• «.+:.,•.-�..Mi«7,.�.. ....;f,'......n.:......,1-l. «�,.,....;,.A. .,.,.r....,u.•:..;,...._.dAmd.u..._:,,.,r..-.r+t._.,N,�.,.n�M4..ud:.1L...++«,,;.a.:i-,.,.r.s.....:.7::,..1%i.«f«,«.::.wH-�`M.,,,.. .>.a ' EXIBITS PRESENTED DRAWINGS AND GRAPHICS EXHIBIT A: EXISTING BUILDING SITE EXHIBIT B: SITE PLAN "B" EXHIBIT C: LANDSCAPE PIAN/SITE PL "B" EXHIBIT D: SITE PLAN "C"/LANDSCAPE PLAN EXHIBIT E: TYPICAL FLOOR PLANS [,,. EXHIBIT F: BUILDING ELEVATION 1 EXHIBIT G: COMPARATIVE BUILDING HEIGHT STUDIES EXHIBIT H: TRAFFIC ENGINEERING STUDY EXHIBIT I: ENGINEERING STUDY ON STORM DRAINAGE FACILITIES z' AND ANALYSIS OF DOWNSTREAM CONDITIONS 1,,, Appendix: Original letter and City of Tigard Commtnity Development Reportment Application t hedk List. j; y r I' . i 1 • ,Wiz, ,, i • • , • 21 I N G gy R / I L p , P . C . Architecture/Planning/Interior Design April 25, 1989 Ie _ Liden h'Ir.� Keith S, a.,� 1 Senior Planner , City of Tigard P.Q. Box 23397 d 'u.., Tigard, Oregon 97223 ' < RE: LINCOLN FIVE, A TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY PROPERTY Subject: 1) Site Development Review Application 0 2) Administrative Variance Application Dear Keith: Please find enclosed for your review and consideration, completed applications with exhibits to include fee's for the above mentioned project. Under separate application, please refer to conditional use and zone change requests 8 712 2-SU as most importan this , project. Please note receipt of engineered traffic study submitted directly by Mr. David Blake of The Trammell Crow Company; , If there are any questions or further comments, please contact this 4 office at your convenience. Than k you for your help and understanding on thi6 most exciting prod ect" . Respectfully submitted, , A, E. Da el Ingrim, A.I.A. Pres'dent I " • enclosure , • I cc. Mr. . David Blak e, Trammell Crow One Centerpointe Drive / Suite 300 / Lake Oswego., Oregon 97035 / 'Telephone: (503) 620-2025 i FAX: (503) 684-1227 . ' :-iw.,� n ,._ , ._..-AaT..... ... » 4.,2..,. —1.2 .,..-- ,..w.._.»...22..4..:..3-..._.. w.a..;. M.4 --...+.>»,-n:.,..,t..:.., i.uKdx_. ..,„„,,,,,,,,k„. ....,u :dl.w 4,,,,u,.»+4.:14T,,..-.2,-.,......,.«.»..e....,i..∎u-..uM:J'w...... .,r,-..,A .:, . I. PROJECT TEAM I Y,a OWNER/APPLICANT: Trammell Crow Company 10260 S.W. Oreenbur Road Suite 750 Portland, Oregon 97223 Contact: Mr. David Blake, Partner . m ARCHITECT: In rtm MiT1sP.C. One Centerpointe Drive� � 1. 1 Suite 300 Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035 n on tact: Mr. Bart Mills C n 1� ar N! RUCTT STRUCTURAL KPFF Consulting Engineers � ENGINEERS: 421 S.W. Sixth Avenue t Portland, Oregon 97204 Contact: Mr. Gafaar H. Gafaar • l , ARCHITECTURAL Oa e5 and Mo o re ENGINEERS: 1220 S.W. Morrison II Portland, Oregon 97201 Contact: Mr. John Martin ,. LANDSCAPE Tuefel's CONSULTANT: 1234� IV .Wa Barnes Road Portland, Oregon 97229 r • u b.. ;; • r„ . � `- • M • ...,.M•...... ,r .-<. ♦-,.,rA.-1.rr. ...w........1..............w..4....—nw.w....+.i,.....r..•I...1 ..+,......Ja .r!.+r.l,.«..-A... :.A.I....,THnw.J..wr . «.., w.........r-r-:4w.rr...+.-1,•... :,, .Nw4..r.wz.rY.1C....-..,r..A-.rlla.+,..-:sr.H.l-.,i...+,..w...riJ•.J.4'•rr.A..k... .i.rrrM«..n•.r4n'.•.4.hI+:J„t�.i..-.,...cd.W-4J11...IW1.IH.F4••(.vi..n✓+W.«.,rrnwrMr..•A.i. • i I,I``„ ii I „ i +lam ��' { PROJECT SUMMARY I 1 L, The Trammell Crow Company proposes to construct a seven story, { 129,000 square foot Office Tower, and a two or five level parking � '- garage to be located adjacent to the existing Lincoln Buildings, to the east of Washington Square (See exhibit A, Existin g Building i 4� Sites) . The proposed building will be sited within an existing parking lot • . , directly north of Lincoln 3 , and is bordered on the north by Locust Street, east to Lincoln Street, south to Lincoln 3, and west of the r' parking. As the subject building displaces existing parking, there 4 n is a proposed two or five level parking garage to the east or , southeast of the building, depending on the scheme. Accompanying this site development application request will be a variance request for modifications to the height limitations, in order to achieve the relative heights of surrounding projects. sar Please note Exhibit VVG which demonstrates the relative heights of adjacent Lincoln Buildings. A. Development Schedule Construction of the proposed midrise building is anticipated { to begin in early summer of 1989 with completion expected by late winter of 1989 I I r B. Materials Descri ti®rll' ' t The xadrise building wi l l be a post tensioned. . concrete e struct ure clad in brick p anels of similar color, and. common materials of the surrounding Lincoln Buildings. The window • system will be solar gray glaZinq ' set in anodized aluminum frames, similar to systems currently employed on Lincoln ' ' ower I I I I The.. ~ o mp an y in g parking I garage will r b e oI f concrete in s tyuctu re, brick inf al l panels similar to the e xistin g parking garage supporting Lincoln , Tower:, S, C.d Coypla anc a With C VlU0.11iwy Je Y eb gLGit JNgg M I 1f 1.: I I . Rj. . „+r...Y..l.:-+..0.,_ ' r.., ae .iir........:........€:...«._i.......,t,.,.......,...0 a...1. .l,'...,....... ..w....._.., innw,...u..{.,.a.i'...».}.r.l n.r,-...«.•r ILW r.b 1.4..+:.» ..-.n'.:.n .-...n...1..•.i ...I.......J' ...� Q/} �N CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION CHECK LIST • The items identified below I represent those specific issues pertaining to this project as outlined in the initial City Check , List. Please note in Appendix "A" the original Check List as issued by the City of Tigard. These items are all fully described and complied within the body of this document. Basic Materials: (Submitted this package) A. Application Form P B. Owners Signature (On Application) C. Title Transfer Instrument D. Assessor's Map E. Plot Or Site Plan F. Applicants Statement • ro G. List Of Property Owners , Specific Materials: I �I A. Site Information (Per Section 18.120 Of Development Code) • 1. Vicinity Map: Av vicinity map has been provided as part of submi. ted Ekhibits, referenced Large Scale , Drawings (per Section 18.102 'I of Development Code) . • 2. Site Size and Dimensions:' Refer e e to Exhibit Drawings will define site and bu ilding. 3 . Contour Lines: Reference to Ekhibits Drawings Will tl' I specify Civil and Geotechnical echnical cond, itions at the site. Refer als o to en gineering reports ad dressi ng utilities, etc. 4. Drainage Patterns Courses and P Refer Drainage � a Ponds: to 4 submitt ed Engineering and ' I re no r s noting ispecifc drainag e patterns, grading plans for . a ement p p Site Water Management� ro ®sags° � 5 of applicable. � 6. Not l applicable. • �p I I I I F ■ t M a,_ 7. Other Site Features (Per Section 180100 of Development Code) .4 [ . 8. Location of Existing' Structures and their uses: On the immediate existing properties, Trammell Crow , i T, " Company has constructed three midrise structures and one parking garage. All adjacent buildings to the west and north of the proposed project are "°" commercial buildings. To the north and east of the proposed project are smaller commercial buildings, 1, a school, and residential structures. Reference to ., . Exhibit A for a complete profile of existing L immediate uses. The zoning surrounding the site is a O follows: North, R-12/C-P/Wash. Co. , South, C-P, East, R-12/R-4.5, West, C-P/C-G. 9. Not applicable 10. Location of Existing Utilities and Easements: 1. Refer Exhibits A- R 2. ReCorded Easements Noted As: r __. a. Subject to statutory powers of the unified �.,. sewerage agency. b. Rights of the public in streets, roads, and highways. I I c. Easement from James L. Hannam to Metzer , Sanitary District recorded April 20, 1965, in Book 549, page 253, Records of Washington County, Oregon, affecting the , westerly 10, feet for sewer line. d. Easement for sewer recorded November 27, { 1978,. Fee no. 78051783, Records of ` Washington County, Oregon., y Easement ment for gas pipeline, November 30, l' 1978, Fee o. 8 N 7 052367 Records of r Washington Oregon. ;, f. Easement for Utilities Order Number 78- 232, October 23 1978. g. Easement for Utilities Order -i g Number 80 t � I h. Muttaald�Ordeir Number 81-73 . Novezttber 7 Easement & Convert 7, 1979, Washington ton 79045 �r, Oregon Fee No. :. W County, 910. 11. Location of Existing Dedicated Right-Of-Ways: . � ��cat'� 1. Stan da rd conditions as Subject to rights of the e` l , and highways. public in streets� �roads No other such dedi dtions were f ound in the Title I I . .0 d • . ..is .<, ,._. ,„ .._ ,-,_ ..,.,.._.,-.........w,-__.......,.,...,. ....-: .n.. ... �. B. Site Development Plan Showing (per Section 18.120 and • 18.108 of Development Code: 1. Proposed Site and surrounding Properties: Refer to Assessor's maps included herein, and Exhibit A of this submission for a graphic overview of proposed ', I..w site. Note that two proposals for the accompanying parking garage are submitted. 2 Not applicable , 3 . Location, ' Dimensions and Names of all: Existing and plotted streets. and other public ways and easements , L. site s and on adjoining properties:on the a. � g erties: Refer to p p Exhibits A-D, as well as tax assession's maps,' as submitted. 4,. Proposed Streets or other Public Ways and Easements on Site: There is a proposed realigning of Lincoln Street between Locust and Oak Streets. Design is currently being reviewed by an independentrtraffic I! engineer, and his report and proposals will be ���-� submitted under separate cover. Refer to Exhibits u A-D for a graphic display of the proposed realignment. In addition to the Lincoln Street ee t p ro osal � . �. . additional site interior circulation roads to parking, and arou nd the building are proposed. The .� - proposed interval ��roadway. systems are under review , with the District Fire Marshalls Office. The proposed site circulation system will be in full compliance and consistant with all applicable Laws and Codes (per '18. 106 of the Development Code) . 5. The Lodation, Dimensions ax'id Setback Distahoes of f; , 18.96 t,Code) • all (Per Section of T�ev�el:cspteza � a. Existing permanent structures, improvements, xn Utilitesr and easements which are located on the site and adjacent property within 25 . feet of the site: In ��Exhibits A D note all existing ! structures with their setbacks. Code requirements for the proposed project setbacks are 0 feet front, 0 feet,, corner, 0/20 feet side, 0/20 feet rear. �I b. Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site: Exhibits A-D identify the prop osed new structures and ,„ have yet to be identified and new designated easements ha � - .. ve e therefore � � �not a:n.dx.cated at this time. I 6. Storm Drainage Paoiltijs and Analysis of Down ' Stream Conditions: Refer to Engineering Report Exhibit I. 7. Sanitary sewer Facilities: Refer to Engineering b 8. The Location of Areas to be Landscaped: Refer to Exhibits C-D for preliminary proposal, A full and . detailed plan with plant schedule will be submitted .0 under separate cover, as designed by Landscape , Consultant. A full area irrigation system is proposed. Plan will be in full conforance with city' `` standards (per Section, 18. 100 Development Code) . 9. The Location and Type of Outdoor Lighting: . The aw~, yp building exterior, parking, and landscape areas will be lighted similarly to existing surrounding buildings. Attention will be made to shielding over light from existing residences and buildings � . adjacent to the site. A .formal proposal with exact " locations and cut sheets will , be submitted under '' . c consideration„ at the separate cover with special parking garage and uncovered parking areas utilizing crime prevention techniques. 10. The Location of all Structures and their Orientation: Refer to Exhibit l Drawings A-E. for a . of g proposed : � graphic �representation all existn and� a buildings on the l site with their orientation (per I Section 18. 64 of Development 'Code) F, . • 1 11. Not applicable. C. Grading Plan: This Section not applicable Geotechnical consultants are .preparing a't this time. hn�.cal consulta e l plans for the City's review and consideration. The ensuing report will be submitted under separate cover. I D. Architectural Drawings: plans 1,. 1 •. I 1. Floor p la lndicating l isgtett: Refer to • 4 E xhib it E f or typical floor plans, to main level and upper floor plans, indicating t.,�j j'.•'.,'.•�.,. ,. I in g r ess / egr ess._. . and di me• n_ s ion s. . The proposed pa rking g a rage is y et to �esigned r� and will be submitted under separate Cover. Refer to �� p proposed foot print of p 4� asking gara g e andp arxing areas Vatc adasofEach. Structure: J Refer to Exhibit 1" . �l' frontal � � fob a f`'tzl' ' elevation indicating architectural i design� ca g` intent, Usage and istratio'ra. The s r ctu.re has not been full „ designed as materials parking hwever� it will utilize similar ldesi n het� however, � I I xr a I , r , and construction techniques as the existing garage structure currently serving Lincoln Tower. E. Landscape Plan: Refer to Exhibits C-D for landscape proposed. A fully designed plan is currently under i. review which will identify intent and bell supported by plant schedules. .All existing trees and shrubs to the extent possible will be saved and or relocated. The finished plan will be complimentary to existing landscaped areas and, features . p (per� Section 18.100 � ��o£ Development Code) 1. Description of Irrigation System: A fully automatic irrigation system will be proposed and submitted to •¢ . �. the City for review and consideration. T o be . submitted under separate cover. 2. Location and Height of Fences Buffers and Screenings: It is not proposed to establish fenced areas within the site. However, use of street trees and shrubs will be utilized to express buffer and transition areas between the site and neighboring properties, as well as between buildings. Special landscape features will be established to screen the • parking ar a e to trans' g g transition the open parking and surrounding buildings (per Section 18.100 of Development l Code)' . 3. Not applicable 4. Location, Type, Size and Species of Existing and ' Proposed Plant Materials: Refer to Exhibit A for existing conditions and Exhibits B and C for proposed plantings. A fully designed plan with plant schedules will be submitted under separate cover for the City's review and consideration (per Section 1.8 . 100 of Development Code) F. Sign Drawings: time. ' g' g ° Not applicable at this All proposed and future signage will ll be in full compliance City and Codes (per Section 18.114 of Development Code8) . • i G. Traffic gene : study ' .., . st� nation ffic consultant 1has ebeen undertaken and has been se arat he Cit for rev i a registered stared ira ion separately review and consideration (per submitted 18.108 ub " ed to the � r 5ectio S.1�8 of Development Code) Sections H abl e to thiS.. � s�� application. and � are not �applio � :+,'_.:e..:,, , w....�,...l. ,,,-a......A.. ..,.r..-,..,.LU..,,.J„ ».��,..«..�e,.,....� ..,_.,,:.�i:,a,w�.,-...x�...,.r.. _..-«..�..,. ....-.1:._.«»-,,,,...,...,....-::a....:..,,,w.,..c,_a+L,..A,.,.`wa::..............«..,,....•k...._...,,..e.r.....a.,.....,,.«,,.-,w....v.4...1,.,4.,....,.,,.+-w...i7.,.r,ro-,,............-«.,�.......,, ..._t.-.+.1,,. 1, . ,,,,„ . . I'.,. v . 1 L, EXHIBIT B r' SITE PLAN OPTION #1 [ 1 I I Site Plan #1 takes advantage of the properties recently purchased by Trammell Crow contained within the Streets 92nd, 93rd, Locust i, • , and Mapleleaf. Contingent upon a zoning change from R-5 to C p, r this property will be utilized for a two level parking structure, and Mapleleaf, 92nd & 93rd will be realigned into a new "Lincoln Street. " SEE EXHIBIT E. This proposal will strongly compliment 4 surrounding neighborhood. the parking structure , . the surrounding g ' The height o�� P g would be 13 "-6" at its highest point. 1' 1 „ ,w, r III' • r I ,, {{ i,' wAk u..,. .,,. . .a. „nL....--.,1+IS...,.,..,x.. ....r..,_:..k.,..,.�-..n-er....,..,.s4w-» �..,«......a.... :....,,.`,x...« ,._....A.,.... ,..,....a.+,•...,++-r.r'.Ix. +..ter.«...,+.-w«.r.,.,,}.,,. .. .. ,Y...,a ... .,N .r,. � ' �- --+..._ �...r.+J.I.,....rd„r w.��n w 4. -.n r lA' ..,..iM.w.M.A�w.iA�.,^n,1,..:11.«I:.wr,++}.I.JJ�..�:n•rw+.r �.M I : 1:. EXHIBIT C ,, • SITE FIB #2 1 l Site Plan ri �2 is contained solely on the existing Lincoln oln Center p property. However, instead of the two level parking structure proposed in Exhibit B, the lack of site acreage requires a 5-level parking will have a height of 43 '-5" and 92nd, 93rd and Map leleaf would remain unimproved. This clearly would not be as complimentary to the surrounding office park or neighborhood due to the placement and scale of the required parking garage. i 1 • L, l' r, 1 Il,1� I I i' i • FREQUEST FOR AN ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE TO THE HEIGHT CODE • Part a' of A licatzon. . Request of an administrative variance to the, height limitations I (Chapter 18.98 of the Development Codes) . Summary of Condition and Reason for Request: Reference to Exhibit •• G, graphically displays heights of existing and proposed buildings. , Lincoln Center is A Trammell Crow Company Development consisting currently of four buildings: Lincoln 1, 2, and 3 buildings are midrise structures of 5 and 6 stories ascending to heights of 15 feet to 80 feet. Lincoln 4, a highrise structure of 12 stories ascends to a height from grade to top of,parapet approximately 153 feet. Persuant. to Chapter 18 .98, Section 18.98. 020 of the Development Cade, it states that "Any building located in a non-residential zone may be built to a maximum height of 75 feet; provided (' . 1. The total floor area of the building does not exceed 1- 1-1/2 the area of the site; • l 2 . The yard dimensions in each case are equal to at least 1/2 of the building height of the principal structure; I 3 . The structure is not abutting a residential zoning ' district. The current zoning of the proposed building site is C-P Professional/Administrative Office Commercial. District. The extent in Commercial District. surrounding zone are CAP and �- '�n the majority CG ad a cent to the osed site is an R-12 zone. Immediately ad a site e ���are small sa�t Immediately � Cent to the Commercial/professional buildings, to the north with intermittent single family ies d en ces across from Locust S t rea t , to the east ar e : � a few single family residences which th e developer ha s purchased and has submitted for a special use permit 87-12 SU, and request for zo ne change. 1 . o east of the oroposed site is elementary school complex with which the developer has negotiated term for a partial purchase of school land which will hopefully be Used for rerou ting u i n g Lincoln Street, . and aid in the placement of the op,,. tion proposing a two tier parking garage. Within Section designated �ubsec(Chapter 8.64 of men.t Codetion 4 "except asDeotherwi,;e . Cho .. provided in Chap ter 18.98, no building in the C-P zoning district p�.. � p � building � g'. rich � � � t Shall exceed 45 feet in height, li , ,,., '•. ...r.._-,..,,,,.._,,, „,,,,,,,, ,,,,, ,, , «_,.......,....-r. ...... ... , .._. „ ...N..,,.,,...a........,.,e e,ia. r., ...-, ...-,.h..i._..,....I,..,c....u., .a,...ln...«..,..J..,b. ..,,...._.....1.,,1...d..i It is our intent that it be shown that special and. unusual circumstances related to the subject site, the literal 1 interpretation of the provisions of the applicable zone would cause an undue or unnecessary hardship to hold the owner from the full ' development potential of his property (p er ORD. 89-06; DRD.83-52) , The granting of a height variance to 92 feet inches for the gra o �.g t 6 anchP e a. proposed building, will allow like use persuan t to existing t' adjacent buildings as described above and demonstrated graphically in Exhibit E of this application. By granting the proposed height variance, it is not going to materially be detrimental to the purpose of Chapter 18, nor be in conflict with the policies of the comprehensive plan, or to any other applicable policies and standards, or .to other properties in ' the same zoning or vicinity. By ranting this height variance it will allow parody with existing structures displaying similar heights. The variance will not single out a singular property, but will rather allow Lincoln Five to experience the same qualities, densities, heights alitaes d ataes, ,'and heig as the . rest of experience Center, where the average height of the existing four buildings is 97 feet from grade to the top of parapet. • The Development Code allows for seven story buildings within the low to U.B.C. to from grade to midrise Section of th�� Um display a height fr �' to the highc.:Gt floor plate to be 75 feet. The proposed building } falls within tbis guideline of 75 feet. The architecture of the building is an attempt to tie its design to the Tower Building by incorporating, a similar pedanient detail which extends 17 feet above' g plate. The addition of the highest floor this design feature adds A with additional quality the entire development and is ~� ~ ' tone ad gt y to tir `s c,o, sas `th existing design paranienters of Lincoln Center. The granting the requested - variance is the minimum ein� u n variance nce necessary to effect the sired and required architectural fabric of th e surroundin g area. Th ere exists in addition an established pr es idence wath the ov erall site, and i e$ Consistent with other such requests. Lastly, by granting the proposed variance, th e resultant use Will ,. be the same as permitted under this Title and City Standards and will be maintained 'to the greatest extent that is ri reasonably possible,'�" p able, wh permitting some ��f the rea while ermx.ttang ,some economic use land. n- the hardshipis not self--imposed, and the 'variance • ; requested elusao , . +s the minimum variance s'��d a ce w � e .��n h.acli. .would alleviate uh 1 hardship. • Please r e fare rce Exhibits ts A-' G conclusively ad graphic representation of the proposed project i o' r . c D 8. A o o-,..-•..,�..•.e _ .,,,,...e_.,,.,,.... o-,.,'••_.,..�..... _.......-�.,u...........-...- _.��....�-.✓.-+-,N.:el..;...r,.w ....,,...a...... .,.aw.,4,,,w,....xna.. ..+1.. ...,•, ...,�..,. ,.•_• ..,.,,.....,k.:.....,._..,a....sJ:�«...•.1 k.�,':.w,.,tau...,.,..,.,U......-,wu.J!»c;:,-4M...a:,Arwa:ln.:4'.. Please note that this "administrative variance request is being sought in conjunction with the "Site Development Applicant" herein presented. I ti i. ii t • I r i i. '. •41ay, 1 + • • , ..,. #, TAX /LOT F• IS1 35 A8/1 ,L. 800,801,900,901CAsE FILE P+r$dQER: 87-122-SU 4801 5: 5101 , ._� • ' LOCUST STREET Proposed , Access r...._:.� v� .1 fit ; : :;:O � : .5 0 ' -7 r� 18. Ac :z:'�Q® R5 .. to .1'6 Ac:. ?. ; 4 �• 0 ., 1,..,. ......... ... .......... .... 0.; ! . • 9 01 ...,,,.;;:.:: • .17Ac, 4 • iii:';:•:�:•;i':�:�::;:•:�;'::�•:� 4 !' . ::.: < ••••::::.: ::::.::., ;. < rn 2 3 A c. : • =I 1 I. . IUD q LEGEND: . A 1 REA �� pNS1iC�ATlAMd �C�L . to 100 NbRT4� 1 1 . i APPLICABLE LAND USE DISTRICTS: APPLICABLE REVIEW STANDARDS R-5 DISTRICT (RESIDENTIAL 5 UNITS PE R ACRE) 1 R-9 DISTRICT (RESUDENTIAL 9 UNITS PER ACRE) OC DISTRICT (OFFICE COMMERCIAL) , 1 INS DISTRICT (INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICT) 1 i 1111 Mc.r i -ell�..•�. 11 v. ..11.. 1111 ■■G 11110111111 • • 5\U71,1.\ \ \ '')'..''r.II. 4 V.,:r< \ ' / I----J ,. C + Ot / I) #1°.4 - 0 , ...,..,,,,,,, N, 1 1 1 / v flaw, _ 411.1 . ' "� :011111111111 1 fit' .w. ;;; I 111■11eb,� ,/,) /I / \I .. 1.1 . Mk sIgi-q Imimm /,I ■ 1 I I - sT = mu J ' ' 4..... ,� nL 11hk.14 Fli !1V :■■ i / 1 i I ' ki .1113 ■:4 . Illa MINN . • ' 1 ' i ' 1 1/ I I I IIIIIIPY1 ri ma-, .., , , ,,!, i j `i WASHINGTON MPLIF 4' / /\."1 • ' 1 L •- . ■ STREET " I \�`�` SQUARE ( �" � ■■ may` ` \ A \ C /R— II .. .• I1IJ1iir/ ` 1 - MALL `'CRESCENT GROVE__o :MIIIii! IENMXNN 1. E ) sp 'e.,,.., I r=CEidETARY__ o - 11 _W �1■i■in =� S ■ III i C1-----11 _ ► '- '�■���10 ■ate.. ■■■■ 7 • STREET t l� 1TOMM ,.... hIi!!. ?m1111■®/z + '.35 36:TEN `` ,' _._�..._.— .._". P � '.,� . �, _ L .UsT _ R r IL 4 - A1' !iiiI Maw�ELEnt st , • may , UI= ill rip mar iiit re/ 1.. , IIIII ci ihill,..... II 111;*7'7 itir mails = II .1 ey _____. / -‘ Ili! ... -\ -,„.:_.. \ ■:".,.. i 1\\ s.w. _Wm ...II °1111 Fr. .11 :I ■ ". 1i:'i \ , ,y1 \ N`1� _. \`\ `�A` M ■ t • ill ,`r_ `" ." �n, at sHAOY LN_•„_, : : jjj;:3 • •. �.. ' :I: Mill 41?-3 i\'' -1•0. -J -:, '4111 111="t ""6PP:A " Er m. 4 ` bAkbia • , 1 . t• N ■m STREE-- � ..: ilk —sin 1 , '��. ®_ice.iiin li :: =tun, ,_., y' ! � :� . All./ fir, .. -�- .b� � . , ai . 'i,' u.-., • � t 4 ■ .111111 � ► . III MI ...1 111111 .....J 11111 46tist, PIE, , A. A► �iw �`®III" TiY1GE6A �- ' RTho " ''�®T ` , ' 111 a so , A:t r, �`'MOM b 4 III ., .. ---- ....,\ ..,,, !,;/ .• IR, . - MIRA lift '4 111 4 ire S li'"V 1 a 0 el EAtlbiit ` ,7,,„0, airfoil w ' r.. 61 1 -'r i< +% Pg , ��4 ,will r,„„} i 4 tk ; . a xatli►i r' 237 LI _ - - 1. - - - - r//// 'Y.---smit Y!/'•'/IXU.w.-Il/,-,,.//XXX/X// f!//!/J///.vrn.w.,Asw vw.r..oamw.w..r/••••••YIXIXXIXWI,wernwX1/IMrxerne X/✓X!/•neeer'MYAYLYIXAYI.,4,0�C.UST YI-0'dA7ll.Yi7VL7H/-',/541'iCYJfWI4YNl7�YA9MyTMfi''/l�• ///�'//�Ix7W117NH MN�YIH- �iL��SCQ7(jlMby{[ ' - - - - - - t'-_ eEGIR..-CA TSS._ - - - - - - - - -_ - _ -..,,.�..- n -C CR.•PJ�3-Y.D'.�P(07![I -- - -- - -- - - - - -- - ,c - - - - - - _ -- r-- 5320- `30 - 50 50, - -'SO - 50,-.x:.-60_-- 'SO_• .50r,_ •5!?,-.,.• 50 $O�_......SD 50.;:•+amt'- 504 SO: 30 -'SD -'30 30 f s0--_-37 5o - fA- "- -D `-'30 - - ^-SO- -- - a- - - - �•_ �� _ - - -- 40SS .s�•--rr-``° 32298•- • - _-1--..- _ -- - _ - - 4 .. 1 1°°° i {�ay'y��Q 1002 J J 7uG EGG $Lr3 EGG 2 2 2��� �;� , a0' _ JAS 0 .69 AC. .22= X24 AZ •-. 33.+dC; r 4 32 AG - 29I-AC. 23.AG. �1 i tan -•-<r.�. *61 0 _.-- o O -, ._ °_ 6 n �•-o Q�1 "'" > 9a.55 4 3 2 1 L 4 3 2 1 19.4 3 y=t -4 3_ -2� a °:4- 3= 2 1 0(� 2 of t i _ - I 1 -_- R_ - 'D r�� 71510_ °u>b $ j '_1 1_ -----_ - �- - - --- _ �o - w - - 7^ �_I6 C�'.c r Tr t A on '�. SD SO - s - � _� � + ..1>- .� � ..a... �.. � -4,91_,_ �- .�- X10-�.. - �- � .�- .. - 111.50 }...� - NI _ t _ 1 -- 1 SD F - Fes-IV a E1 amain 5 12 Ala 1E 5 ��•.�I, 12 g Jp w 364 2 > 0,70 12 5 6 4 7412 t .r.-- - /se n vi_ o - - �O - f_1 -+.J w7. _ RAC - - - - -_ - - • - - 2, - - - - - - 11- a t24$5- -_-�- fi l 4 - - - `7' - - - �N --�;•� +- • .1...;1 _ sE•t.;..'- ••t-- : -� ,- I00 - - "1EZ 5O 5Z TDt3 +191 - _ (..../ '' 4 54 r-212 S ii 7211-•1,• Io- 6 11 E1"'i-.. lane 6 i '_ �' ^ 2 6 11 2 n 6 11 21 SEE MA?_ i o25D 4 1n n�_ c• _ ° =iii 6 IS 1 358_A F - SD i�-- Y -4- _ -f' �Y> 1 T;° 'Y " 1,- ' �- I :-,. I7 ..o a . - . 1 'iii 5Z5o " ,. �-�" >''•'• I 9- Y 4 '� 'er • 'Y � i� SD. rJ I ( 1 �«• Z - 702 Q60G o _- _ Li f 1 s 1 -1 230• _ . 5±: D. _,,I 23=Aa a-°.345th.. ,c n D�ao• boss 7 gI 18 7 $ 9 10 -°�1 I� 8 9 10$1 �$7 8- 3 1�- 8 ? 7 $ ° S IO 2 =y 22 7 .8 "9 IO °-°I �;, `Jo /'_ j jf 6 1 1 J i 1 1 Zl♦�1 1 J ` - - - --- - f. . H<.a , -I-So -A L So -E.- So .SD 6D 4- .. so_ 3D so -d L 3°.-L '3° j=`i-. �` v e- sD aD -o- -sD j... .____.....0- l8a ---SO 1-'SD - 'So - -SD- .--50- tSD0'j _ - c F -- - : L •��' - -o - VACATED RIO '79-127 y« - VACATED R/O 78-232 I .(; a���A}r ][ --_ -- - _L EL_ 1. -'- -- {-.C.R.5508-_3D WIOTH}" 1 - - - - _ ?o, 771_-,c003-r- 1--.-1 - r so-1---so -f" SD -r So Yr :D so�" so s- -�..."'Y"„5.� S0 3D _ y,•-- 50 -sO-- sD :SD 50 • SD - -'SO - --D 3D 'so- 3D:_ -_ 1 r ese� ;, � t _d • - ,, ne 3. 0 _,:2800 2901 - 75' - 3 -- - .,fig - I - 1 (F --,../ �?•"T.:'=} 4.E -410::-`1 k:P9°31 2I7E ( -1 - 1 -- - p 6.16 AC. d: f.v i'� _ Cr) .12Aa .:SZAC. I ilk sa4a -2 i f i<. is 4- 3 2 I °_ol it! _ ,�3' 1� ao° I g) 12 4 3 2 I 0 4 Q 3 2 1 Qt :r-•• t°_c 3:,-/i/'2 1 J - o o - 1+' I e"'p i�3G4- -J' o 7--; ;e is i - i (P,1 4 y J'f� 11 c Z34Ac. 1 1 0 4- - :r:i r' :( r i��' R-1 d d!FTZGPR ELEMENTARY j.!` 1 1_ - _ I ,f-' -10155 + -2- - ii'4'�QS -'-� -+ -7 r - 4- 4- -4- -P 4- 4- -•-tf-• - 4- - 5O -. - -¢ Z'..n 4- .4- -. -I- a:t--- ,y+ --- -- - ��' - -- - - - • - 700 J00 ;.�.� 100 :1➢ °t J00 a o �f�I) - a 5 12 c 0 5 12 5j 1 •1.2 .SCHOOL _DISTRICT 2 J '� { _ F L �2 �nl_ Nia� �� _Rt�.aS� .afi� �n 1.p _ Nter_1° nl yam. - �a 4 ...ra - _ 2 :c.i _ •?Is- _ . . - - `=0• =116,70 -__- - 4 a- - - - - - .4- --. - � "_I'_-- _ 5 - - I•N G.r. - 'e9.3i)sT K�-t•�-+ 'S� '1 _•]nil 4- '� ,.! o 6 it -;7J `•r- I° 6 11 $1�� nn z_-,, -' -. I -1j°. 6 11 a° 6 11 RI i,`,,i Ia 6 11 21 '•i ill 6 i L s •:t tr�r?nw W L 4- _Y N -1 6 °L ri 1 -Y T 7 ,�;y 10 gt §I° 7 10 ElU�'41-, �- It Et ,III; pi'_7 10 r 7 10 r, 1n 7 IG ! 7- ' "� p ii ' -� - -8 9 nl ', 1g- 8 9 R Cr; .IS $ 9 I$ �j. _ 1ss.ls `t too too_ sD :'.., too zsa.ss s 9 _ (J� $ $ 9 12 B 3- �1= 1� - 7ss 7.85' 11001 �. - _ - 5• IQO 0�' 'SD 'I00 - .'AO 30 too - - - _ .�; �" _ L s-, e7T3- ---�-x • ! I > 1Da 1 �p g - MO 31AGtjED, ZED ) YACHT 1D-21653 d- �tT--, D5.5_�-� I2i�s5 Itm '' :,:G%r_ (a.6• r///.,::,ii/ii := %r/i /..' f� if/ice%//i / /.ii f%l:�x� ;91�- ;>31/,���•}� ..-, 4 ..'4T�"�'?lurry l_ -SA HE. _ -3 - 00• , 250 100 108 I ZSD �w - 'ZSD p- '''1«.....» r�.............-'' :.......,....._'..1 - u, _ _ - - .sCie- _ - . 4.22 CRS - �J. 432 MS 1 4.22 CtlSi- -51 '•22'IE 4.22-CHS.- 'X3201 8.48 a °t_ 7i 3300 340! 3200 3203 _ r • {i: 43.30 7lsiG q ,.arm r T! - _7S_T - ' s .J• _A \ 3202 6A .° ',, ` ;*--,1--I'''- Y � a r7e I T 1 -4 s 36-i4a - - - -_ _ 4 I .. - a�- - --- ; - -3Z.j .Vlq- 1 N 1 - pp -.b N �s_j'k- - - \ - - -- q - -- NF - - \. }.i:`1.�� r - 1.4 -yr- 7 1 °-1 - -Z 1 •Z• --F Q n'-� C n l© - 2`' -Q o - _ se CHS - n - --- - _ -- - - qw -- I 1 1 I 75- 75 - - 75 75 !DO - _ ,. . 100 1 1 1 IV y'- 3302 - 3303. 3304 3403 I . I \ I:51- N, N1 ; _22 AC _22 _22 G-.29. ;o 1 �d Ina' 3600 -i ) 33 1. 9 i i 4,.�`. •2 i c 3.116' :btila' gg _- = - a{ - I Hts. ` 1 't _ 3rtro 2 1.1 L s e3°-3a w a° �-- - ----- _ - Ba_a243T - - - - - - 1 T75 R�5 75 5.22 7 H5. •10D - 7530.-=.yam �11 - __-- } N S.1 - _1-->- -' -` AK - REE-�- I -- - -_ - - - - - - , - - - - - - 1 1 - _ - - i C. Z3-40'WIDTH 1 - = �i S - - Q - ----- - - z i- . 1 ` x ' • t 9 , • �,. k �x ' a' •qii'%i •'♦`r.. !. ,•1 r : v:.' , .' ,. '.4L;ri R''r.' .;��', .\•Y ''M;• ';�,,, y.,•: •.!" • ' '♦r.wrwr�MOd>bC- .t.. .., ,.. ...r- , .0 a r.,t... .. • �.}h,` .-iM.•' , ° % ,.: �.•'r� i•M y ie' ..,!:::.t::�+Rt ' 4s ,,,,1. •'4,.„).4e.,,,....,,�� . .1, kt t*rsf l.„r,: ' :40e:clod NV t: $t l ,.` l'irnear 27tSf 4 y ;Ida L> sus cr'k,, � w is .... •' s .t WARRANTY DEED 6 I 0 14 6 9 0 . 2 S ';` "•''x .i ." ''s LINCOLN SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Grantor, convoys and I ' .. 'I; ;:q' 'n h warrants to CROW-SPIEKER-11OSFORD 165, a limited partnership, .'_' IP' . Grantee, the real pro^ '.ty doecr,ibnd in F,xh'lbl t A attached. . ,r r -r- hereto, free of encumbrances except an spool Elr:all sot I t , • p Y' forth , , ,• , A , ,. t ' in Exhibit B attached hereto, �'r � 4', �� � The true consideration for this conveyance '• • n eyanco is X777,000 • . • .;';;;,r''`,', ,:•r d DATED this 29th day of April, 179 1' + C.'iNC9LN SAVINGS AND LOAN L.'�" I,: .. 1 ASSOCI,',, ION By /..i.J...Z.6..,..))(1/ ,•-1----' , Donald W. Hirschbe er, President s'` ` + STATE OF OREGON )' .4°0', qi. 1 .... ,,,� c ) es•, • ti 4+1 :•. I County of Washington ��I p• 4-4A 4... „ t'. �,,; l' +i On the. 29th day of April 1981, personally appeared before r: ,w -,,, me the above named Donald W., iirehberger who, being duly sworn, ' R' did say that 'he is,the President of Lincoln Savings and Loan ', •`, ' Association, a corporation, and that the seal. affixed to the , • .,1• '',. foregoing instrument in the corporate seal of said corporation t • t' '' and that said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of � ' «, ' said corporation by authority of its board of directors; and he �; acknowledged''said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed, -..f,r a V, i� .. er �} } r'.r,`rt t'i�xtary Public for Oregon , . 7 1 tk"/ , ht_y Commission expires: 5.6t F33 - 2 41 r•�+'•1 qy�t wr S ,, d••.,,..• } ,(, '�",t+, Pi::4 f" ' '11 f 1 After recording return to: Until a Change is Requested, Send i t•' '' '2`'1 ; Tax Statements 'to; i• �'' c'w f ;it �"�°. 'r; Crow-Sgiakcr-Hoe ford 465 Crow-Spieker-'Nos ford 965 i �. , 71 0 SW ' ,'.�. ,t�, ',a;� 1 Fir�Loop � 7110 5W, Fir Loop � � � � 1 a7" yq'''�.,„ Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 „L: i,A �. • j f4 t it ;,,, r, ,«1 •' e:,"4•ti• 1 - WARRANTY DEED ;�� � � l' 114,,,-, / r t r 7 WW i '1; , . . . • ' . 'a1' , . i«• ,: j 1' • ♦. . .: ,'; "� Exhibit -A- r, r 1 • WI '•"f �;; PARCEL 1 .- f •r' .'`i ', i A tract of land in the North one-half of Section 35, .r" Township I South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, Wash- ' '• . ington County, Oregon,, being part of Blocks 12, 13, 14 and• 1�. r ; 15, part of vacated Mapleleaf Street (Vac, 79-127), part of vacated Hayes Street (Deed Book 280, Page 172), part of ' • e' vacated Garfield Street (Deed Book 278, Page 629) and part u&.., ,. of vacated Grant Street (Deed Book 278, Page 627), all pwith- ' ; in the TOWN OF METZGER, a recorded plat also including the '' • ' West 100 feet of Lot 7 and Lot 6, 'less the West 100 feet thereof of ASFIBROOK FARM, a recorded plat and also including ,$ . .J '., that portion of an unnamed dedicated roadway in TOWN OF • .,. 7? ' METZGER which was vacated May 6, 1980 by Resolution and Order • •;i 1 Na, 8O-1?.9 of the Board of County Commissioners of Washington -' y�) County, Oregon, and being more particularly described as . ..,, , t� follows: a ,,♦ ' : t Commencing at th'r•southeast corner of Block 15 of tl' TOWN OF MilTZGER, a r.e,,,urded plat and running thence South �" 89°3O'57" West along�tthe south line of said Block 18 170,00 J feet to the True Point of Beginning of the tract of land '� "3 being herein described; thence for part of the distance along part of said south line of Block 15, for part of the . distance crossing the south end of vacated Grant Street • '1 ':a (Geed Book 278, Page 627) and for the remainder of the dis- .y� ,. tance along part of the south line of Block 14 of said {, '` TOWN OF METZGER, in all, South 89°30'57" West 265,92 feet ff' 3.t . y •l1 to the northeast corner of an unnamed dedicated roadway in 14: . : t TOWN OP METZGER which was vacated May 6, 1980 by Resolution i . n•� and Order No. 80-129 of the Board of County Commissioners .; of Washington County, Oregon; thence along the east line % ';•''•. ' o...,•,, ' of sait1 Vacated roadway South 0°S0100" East 16.09 feet to ,',.. ''' the southeast corner of said Vacated roadwa and the north �k+':r. line ',Jf the West 100 feet of LDt 7 of ASHBROO); PAILM, a :-,,,,. ireccvded plat; thence North 89 28'OO'' East along part of . '"'q0�`�1,, said north line of the Yet 100'feet of Lot 7 1.00 feet to the nor hea:tt corner of said West 100 feet of Lot 7; thence t>'1,11;uu .s South 0 ,36'UG" East along the east line of said test 100 feet �• '""� of Lot 7 296,27 feet to the southeast cbrner of said West I ^' ;i c� ���i f y i� �i . 100 feet of Lot 7 and the north side of Se W. Oak Street , ,•, + t..l (County Road lyo, 823); thence along said north side of t.rt, S, W: Oak Street, for part of the distance along the south • • " ' 'f lino of said west 100 feet of Lot 7 and for the remainder , +•` of the distance along' �the south line of sai Lit fi, less ' 'ly., the West 100 feet thereof, in all, South 8928'00" West '•+ , ' , ‘0"..1A..,, .{, 278:53 feet; thence along the east line of the west 10(i ; � {• feet of said Lot 1 North 0 36+00'' i'lest 296,x7 feet to the + r ,'t ,k, northeast cornet Of said west 100 feet df Lot 6; thence , ' , i;a.....1,04.:.V.`, ' -} sq r 1 ��,, i«.�. ny ` t ,fI 4' 4nL•tf I`t 1 ;t {,!{Q .APT ..:, try r141.0*."Y� '" 4 �� l , f• 1 '' f 5 "` t".• l 1, .1 t i J, Y 1 ', '{ ! ,f P'.1�t - r J�fy�r♦yk,, sr�'"•1,,1 ,,',AS a ,� , ,' ,a 4. ,.Mjb 09'.•xn- .., �r�,,Ire;t '� 1} Y A '!f d fx.'j. l r '��•F ••" ""' i(, wi�fl�'y r�" i ! "+:I;.•� . • ' ,. j .. - to J',,i. ,fl ri . ','.0 r;1t.'i: b "�e g';'',K y,y, , .,,� `•, q4 •7 ( L�+ y'(.,, ,` 7',',,*:?'.';'',� "' ri ,t !i")f„;,;',4,:,`:,'"..'",''• • .::t�',C ,'.t•�..f♦P ♦,J•,�� ”.. '•'t,t,,rF�j"+'+r„ ' '�'t 'Cq iw 1('.S r'"`•'.1k!....4‘;'''Yf•� w�• . wf",1„ 1 —,'''c ,:is... • r rff., K,),q,' , t,,,f « .' 4, , If', , " ,•1:,,•+1.,:,.+t•r ... • l •,, y,, (• , 1 1•, . , as I `y. ! D . ■ 0 'r •, . • ' , Imo• ' `• �.' 1=;" ' ' ' ,.44. .,„ •■:, 4,:t '4/,1k,,,ti'd...'44V 't5;.7,4,1 ' rM111- 11PIP -r� Exhibit -A• 4 . ' : PARCEL 1 1 « `If1 "M 5 a' 1 1 t . , 1 'r,'., .. ,;\ 1?` • ; , 1 ;'i'•� ;� along part of the north line of Lot 6 North 89°28'00" East 1.00 feet to the southwest corner of the above described y, ;;t' c roadway vacated by Resolution and Order No, 80-129; thence • ..;; �.�1 along the west line Of said vacated roadway North 0°30,00" • ,.;,,. a West 16.33 feet. to the northwest corner of said vacated '� y,,•11 ! roadway and thelsouth end of vacated Hayes Street (Deed ' nook, 280, Page 1;72), TOWN Op METZGER; thence along°part F, '>' ' •• f of said south end of vacated Hayes Street South 89-30,57" 1 1 West 11,85 feet to the center of said Hayes Street a thence , . ' ' . i: ' ': along the center line of said Hayes Street North 0 30`00" 1 , West 100.00 feet; thence leaving said Hayes Street, for ' •' 11_, I•'• "i 1 part of the distance along the south line of Lot 11, Pluck �. ., . • • ! 12 and the easterly extension of said south line and for '-�' " .} the remainder of the distance along the south line of Lot 6, Block 12, all of the TOWN OF METZGER,, in all, South •Y, �) 89°30'00+' West'254.85 feet to the southeasterly side of E • ► "• x'j r' said southeasterly r' S, W. Grcenburg; Road; thence along maid southeaster!} side ' ;'i1 ;L- of S. W. Greenburg Road t.Ee three following courses, Viz'' . ^ ' '� `r^i iJ (1) North l4i 14'00" East 206.78 Feet, (2) North 89 30'00" . _∎l; • . ���f�!_ , • y, , `±, .-«•�.Y-...._, a!" �a •. •�'''•'• t•. .a4.^ !.•.n '...'2'..'.'"".''..:.1. �•'+'^h' ;' .1,. t-,Y_,• ..St: J-f'••.,4 , '' '�1«Y ' ..+..♦ •Y.t...i..YI'^l+ ,iM'�www\ " ,....'IY.,.,..w.w r r... rr.w.... «•r ♦r.-.w w• .«•., .-,--A••— ' I + . ::.,,.,''..4.. ,',4,. . • ` 1t � { � , 5 E. i i 1•r 4 .y. M. � 1 1. •, 1%JIf? 1`IR#fAl4?7Pl:St�!/`Pi�'lyu■. 1. 1 ;, I C' 1 ^7 ^ N .,•• r Exhibit -A- t , ' ,4 41' 1 , ' ` ' . . ' i. '° , " { A description for northerly part of an unnamed roadway. • '' I , A parcel of land being the northerly part of an unnamed 1 1 ■ dedicated roadway being south of part of Blocks t4 and 15, w ' TOWN OF hiETZGE , a recorded plat, and that part north of part ' , , ?t i of Lots 7 and 8, ASHBROOg FARM, a recorded plat, in the• °;, northeast quarter of Section 35, Township 1 South, Range 1 • West, of the Wiliammette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon, iI, 1 described as follows: ti : Commencing 8t the southeast corner of Block 150 TOhN OF METZGER; 1.`;;', h , thence S 89 30'57" W along the south line of Block IS and ' ' . along the north lino of the unnamed dedicated roadway a ' :y,� 1 distance of 170.00 feet to the ?oint of Beginning of the parcel ' ;. 5! 1 to be described; thence South 0 30' East 7.93 feet to a point P in the centerline of said unnamed roadway; thence South ::'•"+`4 • "•'i� r• 89°29'281t West along the centerline of said unnamed roadway 4F ; I 265.92 feet to the east line of that portion of vacated � M,` unnamed roadway (vacated May 6, 1980, by Resolution and Order r ; ,,`� No. 80-129, Board of Cognty Commissioners, Washington County, I ;t�! 1 Oregon); thence North 0 301 West along the east line of said ' .1 ' '•�lj} ;;� vacated portion of unnamed roadway 8.05 feet to a mint on '. ' • i l' the south lino of said Block id, TOWN OF MET7. ER and the north _ '•14., ,r 't line of said unnamed roadway; thence North 89 30'57" East "�: •:' ' " - v;-. along the north line of said unnamed roadway 265.92 feet to the ' { Point of Beginning; containing 2124,6 square feet, • .3, ar, ? ti •.t, { 1 t. •,,', • ya ti� 1' r 4,i •'I::1'.! , fir` • ` 1 '• � f•y•, 1,`• '.mot 1■ .3 W t'�, � 1 Z' i' t ,r 1 t. It. r�,r#� 7 1,.1 t , +`, ;i t i �;' .,. rA'I' i1 lit ,r„• 1 '''y4���lll 1' t ,'r i,:I,,7 C :'A�'4Uy,� •SYW, 1..'.r•' ; .,, . 1 ,..„, .1 1W' ' ' �i�i�i r1,wh0''Z• V%:,:.*:CAtj t,,:l.;.'''.4'1,,,SA11 Wsi..V.1." . 41 4 ,•*, i 1,1; 1 ' �Iyw,'� ^O�� 11!r i� . \ ' , +y R •,, i �Y• *.f•j . r''' ' ••` .•� 3 1'r"1n lti kVt ',J{. 1 1■ • ,�((�'! ■. �, 4:: 1 k1 V s •+ L . 1.4 x.11- ,t 'Yi.�i 4: t't . ,,•. ,•4,'"` 't, ■ y,i;� .'' '''' •+ • , h'�r .' '''' .j•' '' 14• , u L ,t�•�,,, #p a , �.nt1,.'''•::,.,,•-t', ' gyp 1 «{ l SI, q. r , r�,,1ae C ‘t,,, $6 t.r> " ,% ++�. )"ct" Y wt^• t1wJlK1 ; ,' ,.ti .01$.* ��ra + 1 t j,. 1. .: .1.•1,ic' y,•t,l:, jic,� ":L, s , • r' ' t o ,t,.0.44'1,, ,,,•". ` ' rl '\h ►, j},(,�y'S,,i 'j'}�.JB' �f.iy+j,,�t C`IA(�+.r�{�t 1,��y 7 taY, S 2d 1 'i 7^1,?^.�' G,s, ' •F Y - . a r , y y y y Y ,•'` .o` i+ !� •t•iC 1 `4l{',/ ,y ?'•" 1 N {''{t��J`t'`� •��''1 i" Y � t,�1,�1��.`', n��Y l' 'T�+y.u.�' 'r,y•i '•1. • ..,wi,x.+i.r P+4. ., , , ��r111','', •+ ` ''Y�� 9 y .Y''L'T�4 rliy+k ,'4dtil�t�iit^fi�+Tt '' Y (S14t,w�•1�1� v rFy`,,yl''• i Y• r.k;1' , 4 y �iyi 1 sr r., '1 t • 6 i • :.�: '.„ �. tom,^ ,' .:`" r 'J• .•iy"'. .+�r. „ • P . ,'pL•''SV'v o-�.,.n. ',S,..• �• o',•.•.0r.` L','; .n .,"....,j�rt `,••n ..,`'rti.� .,e a� �• 1F• • S e,Y.• A'4• LI • • � �.,tr 9, ' F t j. ,;;:1 9 �' � , . a � irt , s• + ' i ,. •, 11XIIIKIT 11 I E a, w 1, I980-81 tax ; $15,1u8,)3 unpaid. , ' (Key ,`1o, 1115288) I;SI 35Ai1 01002 Tax Code 158 . 1 f 2, I980-81 taxes $t,501,8S unpaid, (Key No 272038) ISI 35A11 037(H) Tas Code t58 1 I. 3, 1980-81 taxes $779,45 unpaid, (Key Not . 272047) ISI 35AR O3SOC) 'Pax Code 158 is ), .. 4. 498()-81 taxes 51,706.62 unpaid. . • (Key No 272056) IS1 35A11 (3801 Tax Code 133 5, The premises herein described are within and subject to the ik4 statutory powers, Including the power at` assessment of the Unified p Sewerage Agency of Washington Cooney, rt municipal corporation. No ' r "' 1 unpaid assessments as of the date hereof.) ` J ! b. (lights of the public in streets, roads and highways, ' gS 7, An easement far sewer, including the terms and provisions thereof, i . K:• from Lincoln saving:; and Loan Association t ) Unified Sewerage Agency of ' Jr Washington County, recorded November 27, 1.178, (reu NU; 73051785, Records A S . , of Washington County, Oregon. 4, 'r.' '' :L. 8, Ah casement for grts pipeline, including the terms and provisions j 's•., V` thereof,, from I;ihcoln Savings and I.oan Association, an Oregon corporation, to Northwest �da�::t'ai Cans t,om'an' an Oregon corporation, rctordcd .y�,t,' November 30, 1918, Tree No, 780523(,7, Records of Washington County,, Oregon, 1',r, ' 9, An eu5e'm'ent for utilities, .Including the terms and provisions h ": , thereof, as resealed in Washington County Resolution and Order No, 78-232 __ filed October 23, 1518, vacating a portion of 5,i/. Maplcleaf Street, ?I �� 10, E;asefrents for utilities over s f- and acrr.s., the premises formerly Included within the boundaries of the westerly 20 feet of an unnamed . . `'"•' dedictt.to+l roadway, how vacated, as reserved lh IICeolut1bn and i , :•" Order No, 80-129 and within the: boundaries of ah unnamed dedicated roadway, *t; now vacated, as reserved in Resolution and Order ,Mb. 81-73, • i" . • , ';14,. ) 11. Zoning ordinances, oompr'ahensive plans, and the Lincoln (;enter . :: etc planned Unit Development, Washington County No. 7ti-3S5-C, M • .� 12, Mutual cOVLhantsd easements, ihtluding easements rcaerved across 'f' ,I the propsrty described in Exhibit A to this deed, and first re>'usal rights, :N t""' • , ;r,,," all ae described in Efemorandum of Real Estate Agreement between Lincoln . ►'l' Savings and Loan Association and Crow-Splekar41dCford NO dated November 7, - r 'I'l% 1979, as Washington County, Oregon Poe No 79045910, J1 e Ftl , p ;�;, 14111t$tT 8 TO WARRANTY 68Cn initials '4 4"- .•r` iNCQLN sAVtNCs/CROW=SPIRX'iR-llosP'ORD 65 .. ' ' ‘.. ' \'' %Pi' , tt ■ «7nl P , . . ,e. , ,t ir'�rr` . i n , , . MF , (", . a t . 4" • u+..... 4 ._.,..n—.thin..M.H..,r.M...ti..,. .�-._ .• ..., r t' .J�„..w 4.... - ., i- r .�.'....,..I..4...: _. ,,,,+,..a.u...u........r..........n..w....•..4�..� �,. ,,,. .—. - wa.... ..t +.. ,. • ' r.t$ :A..✓ ... r.. .. r. .. '.n, , ',. -".',..'7",',,-...N ',A d .” •,• }'p4'nj,M,�n'- i '* '., ",. •,:1..,'a .,.. L�.• -,,r,1 i+, ',w... t• f ,, ;�,1 .� "„' 1 , E., ', .• C"' I .i" 'k . � . , iMh.«( �' • ;,� I,i, 1.100:; anal ancumbrancus t^tri';IIt•tt or '�ul'14,t'ed h rlr';utiui` MI ti't• . i .Rujticqucn> to )c:bhet 1.4. Ih9!, . L : „i: ., . . . . . , . . , . .. . , . ., . „ . . : . ...s , „, . . , , , .. , . . • . . . . . ,. +.' , . , . . .1, , . . . . . . . , . . ,, . , , ,, ,.,, ., ,,, 1, , . . . ,.„ .. . . , . . . , . . . . i.. , ., . . . . , . , . . . , . . .., .. , . . . . . . , . . . , . . .„ . , , ,, . , r' v , ,.. ',y- '�',, , . , , . , ,, . , , ,..,•tt. , . . . , . I, w , . .. _ , ,„.. . , „ .. .., 4`'. , � r,. • ( �d ,1.t , „ } 1. . . , ,,.... .. .,v,:c„,, . .. . , , . .,. . ,,,,,,.. ..,,.. ,,,,...., . . . . , , i . .,.. .. „,, , ., r.. . , , . .. .,,:,,,,. , -. . . , . .„.,,,,,I ' ,gt"t STATE OF OREOON ' ., . ti � ; �'� Caurity at yVithinthae SS ' .1 w1tl I. Rogmr Thotrtµsa'rt Olretidt at Rntords ' i. • Intl Eiettlaii$Snd ca Officio'Rncotdnt al Carl ‘i i t ueyhfltUs'lot aStd county,,tio hereby 6titbly IhAt ,i thii within in ltuMont of Wrtttnq wh:1 tncNiunia ' j .l tnd tttcotdbif to book of rotbidti al abed"county 1 : i , , ,' ROd 1oiVIA5E`,bltcso ul ,H i d tla^Htdi Lt Elections .; ,, t, .'f• �` I9 i'aP11'2J Fr! It�bl 1 I t. A 't .l. ,•t,.� a.AatPIAl ' A To WAftMAN'rY f tilt ihi.tiut:z =t, +'i�i' ,I,IN i N A'VINISa"/GIiC7W-5P1i3!En tiOsPc t) 65 . -40, '..,,, . . [1 . t/� � •T , ,;t�:., . .Yrv•. ♦,.tiq.p:� , .y,..r.,.♦ii :.+,-„`,i}•+up,p't:'y”' t d t' nn '11*. I 1 1661 '? :� ■ M I ,....,. �. •,n.,.,... u•r w..1.,,..r.....,. .,....V.4.e ♦.a.....•..,,. .r .:.... ..t�..,u ,r ....v. Y......,,. ,....{ r.•„r .... ........ yy r r' • • -s, . �� • we y��. • n r� w �� . r7 IIYtiI�Mt A1�SAd!Dt , L .jDr':.ewer eA 4 NNAM,and �MORMA tEUT i� Lr E PRESENTS, «. N Y H S KNOW x{3.5,NE fi 7• I . ,'j NA N 2NAN4.,.,,hg i b a ztd .ie nd....Sl/.i,t.e. ....,»...............,...»»....._..:»....»... ,1errrna.ltsr called grantor, . 4'7 for the conridernrion lureinaiter ataradi does hereby grant,bargain,s,ri1 and r»nrrr Unto..r». »» �'� , 'CROW-S1'�IEKER-HOSPORD.165.. a limited partnership • »..•. heretriaf.r called grantee,and unto grantee's hsirsi successors and assigns all al that certain nei propwtr'with the 1' . , E... I I .,tenensents, hereditament:: and eOptirtsnancea therunto belonging or in anywise appertaining„setiaated its the Cotinhi 'i i ' sal Wa s h i n t o ton State of O n disaribex,so follows to-wit: Washing , sego , „ t I�I The vast 100 tae,t of Lot 6,' .�,SNEROOE FARM 'in'the•C'ounty, of ;1 ' • . 1 Washingtoa and State of Oreg • EXCEPTING Ti3EREPROl4 'that portion tbereo d'e►ACribed iin jadgieaat f .dated June 9, .1964, entered, in the Circuit Court'of the State i of, Oregon for the,County of V*ahington, Case Millibar 25-8711.---!'- 1 Im SECT TO: 1,» Tho statutory powers of the Unified Sewerage Agency; r I 2. Rights of the pistalic in streets, roads and hirghwsys= and 4 4' t,. I ' ' 3. ,Ea>ieeent from James L. Hanna and Norma Perry Earners* t.,o., ' ': , '. , . . •' lSetzger Saiitary Dist.xict,,recorded April 20, 1065,,in wok 0 ,.. '`_•.�,. 549; page 253, records of Washington County, 6regon,, effecting , t'.1 'i Sttezrly 10 feet of said land for sewer Line. . • `�, � I, . . . .• pc)! .. . , , , ..., . ,„ . , . . , . . ,. , , . . . , , ., .,.. , .. . . . , , , . 1 . , . , . , , . , . , . . . , , , . . . . ' �«• itf SIACr iHSiM}ItltetT�001.Iaat!DesCtfRi Utl taiE tlt�! i ' ' ' ' 1 ' . CP '': rstne sense&s heirx stodge aors also*fa feiritOir. To]Yaire and#n Hold the Barrie unto the said,� and g i tn+ ' ,-• the titre arid actu ,' • er,ateti7d in terms&dollars'is d 1.98 7.98. 0.0 •... tD r i lloweve, the'actual Pte A trdes �iw�,l.M . al'consideration d ae this � m cansiderataon rairu:sti & Cr incturles rather property or rataee given or p,rorsoserd which'its, ' 'i , !!w whfrf. i peat..G7A.r ainsiderahbn(indicate svhirh), (7t.i cent r.ca bet,,,w.uo ilti,..a mlxsie�,lf nee aMpJioa}.lo,irJwii/tt 6.,>fiier.,d.S.o QRS 91 A1d.1 . ` Iii oorlsrreriag this deed and,where the cantezt so requires,the Singular incliudeis the plitra/and alp,gran ed.ittiddi ` ■∎ sham,es dial/bo implied to:rialto the prmvisidna here&app11+equedly to corporations raid to irsdiriduult, ;, In Witness:Whit:oli the greuitor hai executed this instrtirnent this 3i .,d,ay ad, J1 0 i1 :' „ .;1981..; , i it,i cc,e0orari�iron:tor;it het cwUsed its ruime to be signed a.nd seal ellized by'• officers,duly tutlthriirrd thiseto by, ri • ' 6rrier'&its baattl of dire< ore. 't 1.y +.wsta►N a...nw±drM. ' , eA4i +p iwdl /K.. STATE COP OR2 .M7 -' - -' yr, ..' ' Sd A2 d Ole OlRj<OQli G,�u. i.l ti�af i � iC1►lr. .» ty++aa.6fr aaw«a! .�_ _t_f_. 1 L .,..sub . .»..w... ..............w.,w,t.Y. 6.1.4 a.orr a rr, i 1 a1.� j,,,,ar�s n.:n r ..i iL,,.L. *.wk tmr isle io.lt resat erns ca.td�t1,.'DAMP. .i oar ttl+,.*ail.koivr w 4 iii i' ..14.tZ.t1 i,,:a ,�..tiii ioL.. .trx.r.p .a... " w,..«. .,....««...w-;..w. Mt sell tiwiii 6111,Irts.m'fi to »` »n.oa st,ry rt w..., �.w 1 l 1 t•tai 6,..•.h'+3 blunt ilY act ai,d d sd. co On a /lei/eh* ifkid n ideei met n 6i.- . ' • « beds iii ii ecrpoeitlan by.dithority et lt.hoed*I cileie,ori;eked seas.4 ■ ' , + i • £e_..cMowkid iisi M titteimli.t oar hi lea r.Atiiitiirr sct eves . • 1• 3 1 i q� 8iloo,ei�: Otorici.lt, SZAL) ...,,.... . . . ..�...�...,. ate) r , t Ma r a M(b �.. N o r .. art deoinera.8lee ed lrun 7, „. kf? .64` '' ' ' . », • : i IiiiitAMi JtatSI L. ,., , ... . . ! ' 1 Nettie P■irr�jr _....,.....,.„.,,,_,,..I' -�-,• ,._, fetievtii c► oak+aoie i �. _r«,,.•,''",w. '"ie4iitaii.ANiu�' .s 0 .,, si4ilookiieleife r' 1 ' CEOW'-Stitt 9t-UUOS li . pa +a. ',' • ri.�+rr t :.., .. ire■d tiatikeia ieid E51.Ofhisw 16iconi of Con's { i v�`b'y' i iasd at d,sia k+«.ibv eiric i-• ~. _ aiub,:*.kiFilYii.4..cbmibs'W oirb iI, fti ii*i".^.°,4"64..4+r�!!fn0ii mod • wr i.ic5 N.Vralir of tr+rt• .d e+oir+*iV,' b Alm a\tor S 1.s k Ilk'-to S f 6,x d '#6 S eittdirratin'a uii,i Nat fsc' '''') cikii ilt0'9 i � L. EII.PSe�o+od i�' .d/ii ixritc'ii Ei Ecikni! aES"i'""r a- -. •; i 1 ,: . ; P �. ..... . 71�o Si � tr iL a� 4 .. . i», .�,' ,, . d , . � ..i. „ }t.i1,e iL.".wl hi °«a+iw Mr isi tl�r.ih Yi etli.e 4/444:�►: , • �� ��, ”^ . . , . , .._ ...r «.«.-.,,_a } " it •ye +ii'iICL igi.... ..' - . N ,..,k`t •+w tr Gj'-' + ' ;' M. „ . I nrr..r-wrrL+�.w , , t•. ii, , 1_ , b Y r =»w . M1IY 4� . ''''‘1.. � ;.� ; rl Y + i .4.0•00' -•.i. 4', 7''`ia i413/4'Nt,''' '.'.t i, I: - , •, / i !,' R Z„iY . i.�.gi s 1.:0 <, A. t a Y L' ;A.i,°t . l';%d . i'•- v' 1I .l. ! wr , r r' . , • , , . . • • . . . . , . . • . ' . .. • . . . , • , . . , • „ . ' • . . . , . „ - • 1 I ' ik,... • ,- , ... • - • . . . , .• 4, ' , . „ . . -„. - i' . - .• . . •,' • •. t ' , .• . . , . ., , ... .,, . , ' . . ..- . .. .. • . ` - : * ' • • ' • ' < ( ,'Ir:L, , ' . I• • . • , . • • .. - ., . ... -...... „. - .-„,- .... .. . . , • , ( -„1....:. .. . . . .. . 1• j . . ,., Z„-, Joao Idak 11147.,3ires taw NipatwAkawipl,ftriewski,Om 1170011 ........-... '"-.-- ""--" "3 0 0 Sa g;..,-_...., 1 , „ "'Icor ' __ .•, Two Inourortoo,comr,„7, liZECIAL.WMPLIGILNTY DEZ:lat-STICTICITOItir MIMI II 1, 4 . , INOIVIDUAL asuarroo ' . ItighAel.Al. on.. neel,anc:1 ,,,,”rpstee under Beatrice A. Stanley Irrevocable Trust 1 )q• ... . - . conveys and specially warrants to..,CrowSpi eker-Hosford..#65...an.Oregon partnership . . . . ' , the follow:ing described real property free of encumbrances created or suffered by the Grantor exceptals gpik.. . ally set forth ilend12,situated in liaSliirtg,t00,..,...--..„County,Ore&rt to-wit: , . , , . t ,, . ,:,,, '' Lots 7, 8, 9 and 10, Block 12, Town of Metzger,County of Washington and i' 1 • ,o, I State of Oreoon. ' .0 . • I . I This Deed is in fulfillment of that,certain Contract recorded June 3, 1981, No. 81018707., 1 ■` , . i . ' • ' i 11,1 ' , — - . . il 1 . : ■I iw spAcz ilheSUatf Ktriif.OZttftk.12 DeSCJIIPTION ON civics/sCeo ,.., a • ...,, Tim sd property is free of all encumbranceS created to ted Or suffered by the Granr lce* those created since . aiJune 3, 1981. . • , . ..* . ,. , . . • ! • • . , The true consideration for litia convey trice is$..2074685.4.37 (Here ocipply with the requirement*a ORS 96(.0.10) ! t ; • 1 I ai_tlarth............ ..„Ma... I , I , 'p , / 1, • • . , ' 1 . , : ,, , .,,..,, . ,.C.y.:•..,57"ATE OF OREGON, County of.....ViaShiligthn,....)iii. ..4.. : .,,,4.ton IL. /.0.,04 •. : I ' • •,! : Feroontlly Appeared em .1**d hAiiied Al ion IC:npgIrY4 . Q. ,,.) ,..4,,,I■:.,.,,,f, 1 1.1.,":, t. .i' L : .•e •"----.-".- •...4,,..9 1 1 h, 5 ..c* aild acknowiedged the fotekioirig instrurnent to b..„ hi s, rehiniary isci end deed: f. _ ?ar..; E I , , . :, ' ,• .),.• ,. . ,. .k•-• t 4, '..1 ... 0 t.) Z il "'et ' - ,•,* Ca ." ,, ''',( MerAt.t 1E1/404 A ,.'0' BefOat 1220i ......4:.ZaiicZE:,.„,,a......el' —,..,,..- , Aroiarr otibli, lot OiedciMy tocricitiOlalexpities.".."..".a.;.Z.P„1. ..L...._;.:-, 1 . „,,, ---- .. • i , , 11 OirtePir, 9VA-ititAlelle tir-w , • II j -- trait Oft Ofeidoil 1 , aii e.otirrty 6/Wiiiiiiiiikrec . . I; ....:tiejjW.T.,SPike-flosfoltd„#.6.L.,....4,„,--„re..... ,, ' I . .,......C,,........ I.bd Wori,Mice*/of AiWaiiiirerist Ai ideaile iiii.ii i.... OW Itiaillioa end tii-Otilco iiiictiSesir o4 Coro. , 1 . „ ToAinynt 11 C Poo colitRatiy atiyailcat toi tald ,'34.ii-ii.i.6.0 floriitii triiiit?tha . , 157,11`,"-uart3§-6---tittIFII and 97228 ii°A"'"i643' ., iind tea:triad in book et hiPailf iii Di sitiAlit COOVAY. 1 --T5Jbbly gi:T6ibuett_iiii ' ' ii-adomaist.1 WA '.: ikruili iiii,"Mcilioil.T.4.1ecive ar'!,,,,:‘ ,' Portland— ' _,,, 97223 — . '''' k AikickiCiikiiti ii‘ii I'"-acitiitcori.&•• 'i, 1 AiAbilit,Abo.itilsi. 21 e 4, '. 1:•.'i , Imo a Aiaira I.•aaiaaant,all i.as tAiiiipailiiii '')N4/4444-44 „ -,...................—...... 1 ' , . I 1993 kiIR 24 FM la,,,Is 1 - 7— '""7,' • ,,._ . ,„ , , , . , 1 i . 1 . • 1 t A . . .,,,tl.wf, . 1 ''.w.. c r.q, "' ' •„, +.4;,''‘!.110 2;,,:y4„'T+tVsit?Jf!::f„,i(1't r O' ” l: ' .''' ..',:,•rf.e'.fir 4 , +, ,�•y-'i����y.,.,y.1-i,J'�•J,Y ,,: ....�,4,,7G r , J ..�.�.1<tir%1ilH'."fF• /,•I ,Vj. ,is � . .L a,. ^4_t.q •y„Ilff•��'L. , t,:�''k••y,,444,:i..:7,..�7' .e�'.'�, ,,, • 1 > r• /^ • •d.•i, ' `+�i7)':;Y'7; r• ;I '',. ••)^+;,;,T1.1 �V,'N.,'•.., r.:,0•'.' . .,;In I:: • ., . .., .1....0..f...„..ICY\,. . !�' rlr r,y�. . •^',.,.• ' .�,, .f: 1°/.. ti d , • 4'1.'' v •• " PaaM Ns,e+4--twlreulM ago—nAnncirr roaM ii.,�nt�.,l ovar►.�l. w.,eew.u..a _ •F'?K . °l..f1.L,∎Pe tl..4ntn9,...nLw. 1I r y ii<; �.1 V f to�3' i `„CRpW-•B I.I A-H1•scORD #117 A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CROW-S'IEKER-H 1 • . 1' 4 P i'''1. DELAWARE LIM/TED PARTNERSHIP Grantor, i . ,; releases And itciaims to LINCOLN CENTER PIi,1,SE IV LIMITED PARTNERSHIP A '�A 1,19•,,,11 MZ;Tgp PARTNER ............P I �• ' .i,,, „,,,,,M.,,M......,,,.1..1.,,,.11,.».,r.•,.,..•.,.,,..,•.Y•,......,.,.,.'........,,. ,. .... ,..„,.,,.,•,,,...,. „ . . . Grantee,all right,title and interest in and to the following described red property situated in WASHINGTON .1111 ., ,,,,County, Oregon, to•wit; .4 AS FULLY DESCRIBED ON EXHIb:T i'A” ATTACHED 5 v 1 Y� / ` ��,. y "'r .1 , l E • 7 :. i !,•r• � � R � �10 l. �pTN R�RT ,+ aU [ �i � lAC R � S FPY T%7G P � [ I , , , HNfOR O AINCR7 I � Y 1 _ ' I Ili i+R'GI toistoOlcitHt,coN11NUl Dt$CQIPtioN G• oiVt11d 61b11 ' +t' ��� RT1te trM couid.ratton far thir conveyatne is dr,•, •,•', (fleet comply'with the n9 uirements of O 93,0, . 9t ” .,rygk .................................................................... 1..1..11 r,....,,r,r....r........,,......, ,.....r.,..•.•..•.YM..,MY.i..M,Y•Mr....M.•,..,.,..,,.,....r• ., 3181 Dec.mber J9 07 I., ' r Dated this day of.„,.,,M,,,Y,.M,...,,•,.r....,,.,,, CROW*SP/EKER'»NOSFORD f 117 h, : ' ji,' ti-,.,' rr-sPrtR'-misrouD,..188' r 1 d , ' . , .r',.1 '�','•'•..,.• 1.1..1.1,. ,. ,..,. .,.,.,...r..,,.,..,... r.,,.•ii•....•. ,. STA7' ! • u.,. n DeCeinber 3t j 87 'r ' .:.• . OREGr'�111,, d�j fy •of .. 'sd,1, t v +.i c . ! $' rtaltMrallig d, a�bovve nomad 17an! t'. i Bo rdeni...G1.q.4,..Pilrtn,8r at Crow�S.+S ekai,'- . 1 Hootar , ra ie irr•Han?ord b'88 ., t unr.Sr.. r.ly.a. 1.....1 n,1 ... . r............. ru,.us.nw.- ....,. ..,,. 1y,g , •. c,,�� f C t ark!acArtowled • the lot goring i nt to be,. 1:!!.„.„.voluntary act and deed) • ' ' „,,..1.,. ,,. ,, ._111.1 f t:',■' on f;aliar' Aiilkti �QiiYCriiiriihipe: ; ' :Il, (er►1CALti440F W'00° l of ry Public lot Oregon '• y commisWOn axplres;•,$..'.3.tl.89.,, ,.J...,.,,,,. r.'KI�T,..'. 1 L.�........�..,,,- "'ear •' Ufl'CI.AIM DIED ti'ii,.,, •:r' ”, STATE OP OREGON0 ..! i, ' 1 .1 CROW-SPIEKER»NOSPoRD 11.17& /SS �r`�; t i111: . LINCOLN CENTER RASE IV',, assn'" Counyty�al,,},...,,..,,.:....,..00,.,,,,•,,,.,,...., ,1... , .! ? ,,.. I certify that the within lMON ��ry I'' } men ed for record r the f + C real Iv �.• . �p��W� tit y At.i, t'^re Y.I*IW�i MMM•1.day tit IL.............Y,...M.Y.,i,i.•J•,,, ,.,•,,..f) Q .'�' I , • • `�.+ LINCOLN W GER PH PHASE Rd. /200 spits�aa'"'V1e ,.o'clock ,,:MM,,and recorded �':;r " At.,1.1.1....1 r 1�'u.,k 1, 7 2 231 hi M,.M.,„»,.,iMi on ,,'''' C nftc” y } )�'}`, M.•..„r..•... ,,,...-....,.....«......,�.. • •.+.«• , pate,.........,�•J,.•ii at a!)IeJ!ile/1niltr{.tr =�"r” rr't ,�•• 7 l/I i V,f _ �•� bOOlt jreel vDluma l�lo., lUUJ.....� d OR oncNin i'uai i` montjtritcroGlm/raptidn lJo.,,,ui ,.,, { , ..: !taco f O I .R; i+ +r1 AoR ,:rd rd o eili7�a1 said coeinty, , }� Witrifisil rriy ha:xi acid beat` of 1 •�.�■�.,11., "+:.',' item o c ee*le et ail fifer cMiaieeti ikeii ice eMn de tai iiiii'e+,e1 County Attired. �� %It;, :'. '• .. • 1:: ',.,..k � q , +Ty,��!/�t� r�'(/� },,�i rip '�� � i KRb`)fNiAll...J RI RI aLEJ,l1AA.s♦..«is,w.k»M.1 .,,....«_. ,uiiJli,NAMId,,:,i,,,,...r...,,.„.iii.i.,i.,,:,,YITLt•i•iw•ci t i1nnqr� n( .ap.. +! . • 1 I r ..,..+«..+-...,... by... r{M...YM»,.,1..1,iri.�,,,....6,.L,M. ©epcity • ..••d „ t• " , 4 ' 4,,,;.•,;,•,:11`., . ,• rt • ••.• . r '� • ` � , '',,,f,',„„;i .11,1:- • r r 1 bu ' • }1I r'” + ;'q ; ,' ,a' x ' l 'i •1 ., OT; ! .,'1,,,,,t ••�' ,A,1:47' t , lN 41 S ft':}'r1�i tie"' y I'1 •y 1 )/+ M• ,• .. 44,„ ',. A'y :+1 ■ •1 i � F «:� '• ,q::,,.1+1 ". t J ,wI .r , ,•» ' ,H +r . r i , , , R ■ , ^1t .. .. .... ,.. .., ,,. .. ..... •.. ,".. .' .. ., '..... , '.', .•..v .,, .111....1. ,.. .u., ,... .. q . , . , , . . . . , . . ' •, • , , , I . , , . I . I ; • . „ I I ; ; . ; „ • , I ; ; . . , • ' ; • . . _ ,,,,,-. , . , . , , • . . , \ . • , , • ,. . , ,. • .. • . ig41;■••=itniaTall , .. . , . • . ,:. ...,.,.t.; ..ti1.1, ..,.;,,.,,,, ; ./.a- •:...4.54-Trs•m.S.,,,,,i.t.tio,kii2" • , ' ' . 41.'''',,,' , ''''•' , 1 . ,' , .t^•.,',,;.' '':',.-:4''.',',%.?:"'%,Pt't,V''I:... Yr'$1•17,1:';',41,4VM,'q).•4.:'• '''' ' • l'''''''''r:':.Z4,40V4X1.51.0'. „g4., t-...'T,.,0; .,...„, .,.7,-; /,1,...?,,v--” : ' –.•., . . al ,,, ,, , , ... .......„, :4.....,,,..4.,.,„v4m.-41,i10-...t-,,,, y • ,.' :,' •• "..,r-i?, A 4 - – •,. •za. ,,,,.. .,..-04.-, . t t'l ia■..41 ['! . '.. ' . ' • ' '''' ' ' ' .'a ''' ' a::774tIY: gi' h'714..'74, . ../, , . • , ' W 1e ' t •. c,4 " e • , , ,,,' I C.3 444" ',V:::: ••••`':' t' .• • • , 'C2 '42.:':', .. !! , . . , , '1: / .. ,. . , , , IN EXHIBIT "A" '1, .y, A' ' • • ' . L I • y • ....,0 , 9 i ,. .te.'14•* . , A tract of land in the North one-half of Section 35, ToWnship 1 ,i-P4:11':'. • . South, Range 1 W.-„Ist, Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon, . , , 1 r'... ' lif • 1, being portion of Lots 7 and 8, wASEBROOk FARM", a recorded plat; a .■,,ii-4+:. portion of Block 14, TOWN OF METZGER", a recorded plat; a portion of vacated S.W. Grant Street and a portion of a vacated, unnamed , . • street, all being mote particularly described as folloWal 'i-ir,.. .1. ,' I: ! ',M1;,i. _, ',.*.g64'. 1 , , 11'R ' Commencing at the Southeast corner of Block 15, "TOWN OF METZGER", ",' ,, , . t• . aforesaid; thence South DO° 30' 00" Matt along the East line •-',41.. (extended Southerly) thereof 7.8.0 feet to a point in the centerline •• 1 of the aforementioned vacated, unnamed attest and the true point of _ , ,,, beginning; thence South 00° 36' 19" East 172.68 feet; thence South tIrgi4.'. 89° 341 11° West 9.96 feet; thopda south 00° 36' 19" East 120,00 , . .. teet to a point 30.00 feet Northerly from (when meadured at right • , . , , .,, .. , the e centerline of S.W. Oak Street, a dedicated street; , ,, ' . H, thence SOUth 89" 34' 11" West parallel to said centerline 445.00 i #.4 , feet to a point 20A0 feet West of (when measured at right angles) . . • of , - _„ . the Batt line of the West 100000 feet of Lot 7, "ASHROOK FARM", f, " „ Aforesaid; thence North 006 36' 19° West parallel to Said lite (and ,' b:nie; 1 its Northerly extentiOn) 390.30 feet; thence North 80° 44' 00° teat 160465 feet; thence South 00° 30' 00" Eadt 39.65 feet; thence South •Aw.. 4., ' P.. ., • 45° 30' 00" teat 119.38 feet to a point ih the centerline Of the , ., . atorpdaid vacated, unnamed street; thence North 09° 29' 28" East „: '':•:,:,,0' , , . along Said centerline 203.05 feet to the point of beginning. - ,. • ..:'. EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion lying wedt Of the Eant line of the West 100,00 feet of Lot 7, ASES100E FARM, And She of the centerline of the aforementioned vacated, unnamed street. . •, . H. ,. , Li ; . . 41i74'.'t4, , eO . ate,otiA:oalidwitholtnitoON 1' — ! . • .. ‘ , ; , .4(... 0,..,, , • e'r`f:,',':,-• • = i t, eind it.boiiiixationiild Wilivskleilionex.omati,DiriktptecitotwOi Anse' of con' 1,..i ei r.:4.• , ..' .1e— •• . d, viiysitei tof iiild stOiit*,do*04. )'.4'0 ',---„,*. • , the *Win inittutyient al Writirlti *as r 1. . . . 1 grid reicotded In book of*OW, :tetiodi&gd, oleictotdoiirth:71 ! • 't1.:'''':,1,.!;,.;:4'.:,': ' ,.. i 4 . Mis*t enieni OA Toilikxl, EX' .. •...",..f, : . .•,. Officio Couiiiii Clei14 , . , -.. ;•':; .4 . 1 , ' • . If. ! ., . , •,.... , , , , . !*, • . ', :: y - ' il • ,' . • . , , .• $.•.,4,' li?0 EC 3 1 PH 3". it •".-. '\ ..- . et)--' : .. „•4,., .,.. I • -•: ' , 1 , .• •4'1.. . .'' s' i'''* • • ': 1 f•. , ' i . • ' . i''" ' r. ' • ' ' . , .. . ,,, ..„.,• , . 4, .• kr : . • ' ' , . " ' ' 'li ''''I r' ''•1-'` ,.. • . : . , . . ,. , . i.? • , . , r ,• ., . . . . , . . . . . . ,, . , . . . ' ,.. . . • • • ' . , • . • ' , , , , ' , , , ' • ,,, , , . . ' , . . . • . , . . , . . , . • • ' . , . , , , , , , . , . , . , •1 ' • . . , , ,.„., „. ,5_,,,, ... „....,., .,.,5„,..... ,.•,. . ,,, .. , ,., . _..._....5,.. , . , . . ,• . ' . ' . . . . . . . • , . 0664615111111104010.' ' I. ', . • I,. . ■Dt., OK No.711-1ANGAIN AND CALI DIM IlnoilvIelool et Coteoroto). 8 7 Q 4 a4 I'87 74, STIVINS.N.1 LA r. — 0 A 0 ,0 .0, , , orriTLE . , , 11' INSURANCE lAnGAIN'AND SALil Dub 8 76 /9z7/0 8 it' . ,.., 1,„ i• . . f. , . . KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS;That„,,CAPYI.r.PP;gKER,-HOSFORD #117,,,a Tax,aa , ' , . , • •, limited partnership , „, ,,,, „,. ,,,,,,,,„, „ , - - • ,-- ,,hereinafter called grantor, ' . :..,. .j, , , ,. ,. : t '' ' for the consideration hereinafter stated,does hereby grant,bargain, sell and convey unto CROW-SPIEXER-HO,SPOAP,. , um, L.P., a DelaWare limited partnership . , ' 5 t`-. hereinafter called grantee, and unto grantee't heirs, sUcceesors and assigns all of that certain real property with the ' .,.ir . ..., . . I ,,. • lyr‘i tenements, hereditamenti and appUrtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise ppertaining,situated in the County : , tol ,,, Waahington .1. ,, %, a ,State of Oregon,described.as lolloWa,to-wit: .. , f° , , [,- "' 4 .4-\ , PARCEL I I t• , 4 , . '..,, '.,' ' ‘, Part of Lots 1, 2 and 12, Block 8, TOWN OF METZGER, Waahington CoUnty, Oregon, described , . . 5 . • i • • . 1 , . , . , Beginning at a 1/2 inch iron pipe at the Northeast corner of Block 8, TOWN OF METZGER ?, ' 1 . SUBDIVISION; thence South 00° 30 East, 80.00 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod' and the , ,t true point of beginnings thence South 00° 30' East, 70.00 feet to a 5/8 inch iron .'4, , • '. ' ''' rod; thence South 89° 30' West, 100.00 feet where a 1: inch iron pipe, bears, South . . . 4 0.1 feet; thence North 00° 30' West, 70.00 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rods thence North ..-- ( A , . /....j1-- , . 1,:: 89° 30' East, 100.00 feet to the true point of beginning. . , , . . ,. ,, , ,. ' . ' . PARCEL III Os' , , 5.' 5 ' 5 1 , , , .,,,. ,. Lots 9 and 10, Block 8, TOWN OP METZGER, Caunty of Washington and State of Oregon. - ' • ''' +... . ' . " EXCEPTING THEREFROM the Northerly 25 feet of said iota. t, , ' . ' • ,. ., : , TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated Mapleleaf Street adjacent to said Lott. 9 and 10, ', * • . . .- - , r. ' , ' , accruing thereto by reason of the vacation of Mapleleaf, pursuant to the iiesolution ., i. . and Order of the Washington County Commissionera, under No. 78-232, dated October 17, , 5' , l• 1978. 5 • . , . . , S, , : •' , • (Description ContinUed on Reverse Side) ' . ! , , . ' II F SOACE INSUFFICIENT, CONTINUE DESCRIPTION ON REVERSE SIDEI . - , 7'o Have and to Hold the same Unto the said grantee and grantee's heirs,successors and assigns foreVer, q,:' , . • . , The trUe and actual dorNideration paid for this transfer,stated in terms of dollets,is$ 0 4 • ..".'" . .• s. 414440-10fiankddailiXUNIgIftvdtlaDatidlisit*Ot.67306xxbaltietaXacinutVelijitaktotzarrobt/iXotgkoe)txtg!kxatrit.iabetobtritlaatia< A: , . . 1,,i,,,,,-,7,NunmiktacidoxiyadditiclowhoonsugAiwolawmowa.maxiounooalablommimaizenet,H)stikNocraxxxbac 'Alri, ..' S. • . In construing this deed and where the conteXt so requires, the singular includes the plural and all grainmatiCal ' -•"t's' . .. , , , • ' 1.3 : :• '4 • ' .ii • • • changed shall be irrar1.4 to make the provisions hereOl apply equally to corporations and to individuals. In Witness Whereof,the grantor has executed this instrument this 25 t.:belay 0/ September ,19 81 ; if a corporate grantor,it has caused its name to be signed and seal affixed by its officers,duly authorixed thereto by order of its boerd cd directors, . ,..."1. . . . 4i...., .ittk, '07: , . . CAL)04119 ER-•*-FORD #117 ' . . . • THIs It4sTRUHtt.lf WILL Not AlLoW UsE or THE PROPERTY DE. .-....... ,,•- ---.-.........,............----,-----......-- S. , ScRIFIED IN TAls INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION Op APpLICAEILE LAND e t .e‹ ' USE LAWS A 5,10 REGULATIONS. BEFORE sIGNING OR AccErillie ..}3' ;„.„ „ t. .., ,i. „. „. .L„ .• .....,.....,......................, , . % THIS INSISUYIENT, THE PERsoN ACQUIRING PEE TITLE TO THE V: . • ;t : , PROPERTY S-1OULD CHECK yi,ITH THE APpROPRIATE cITY oR r, ;...,....,............ Partner .,„...... ....... . CoUNTY pLANNING(APARTMENT T1 VERIFY A.PPtioVED U5Es, ' , . , III ni,ila!iot,if,Ate co,iroVo lo I 1,yo,!!off,”1, . , , . 1 , :1 age fflO Ism of etlinowlioll/aoalOplorio., , ' IORS 104.5,01 . , , 13.1 „ ''' ' STATE OF citrtrw-aN,•Ca..- a- ) srd TE OF OPEGON,County°I )33, , •1,1,!..: ., . , .. l't . . The lorqoind In3Irurnent war helthowledifrd bdiore ma Mill , Cpi1DiY 0/ 'fiethl. i a.-&-,o >m` 'O. •' .. '. '. - ,,,.. • 76 i.,00/4 ini run'fl i mos nektiotWailget1 Wore ,19 ,by ■ ''.:..i.: .., I 4 $ t, ,, . . - probnioni,end by , • :',4 tcNfY‘T.,."'""fi, • ' $19 Ell$by . , socretArycil . M. ., ,..,',V.,J(Sie9,1ict,11Tot roan, Who is General , 4'.•A . - ' ' Ii' • .,,.:, , , 'S t A torporallon,on&dud,ol 016 enrPoratinn, it.1%,..,i - '+':: ' e a,.To-IA a' ti.r05,54bed partnerdhip, I '''6,.• • t “. i.-t • • ' • ' , A • ri,4`` ' ' a "r: 'Ati,htli)b,*(1 Ciii the limited partner-, , . , :4 , 1.1- 1 „,:',Eihip• o., ,., ! InagotarMU6X oqr....!oh NetAry Fublic Mr Oregon ".',.••• ; i (SEAL) i1• ' tr:.t' -414',0017%SWOrt exPirest 1 i 10 m 0 My corronisitea bit:Otitis: • . 5. :::::+1 5 . ,. . . %. , 4.1 ,.., ,.,gi • ..' .1_ , CftW,,Sgi'dtker-Hanford 0117 STADE OP ORI.bOtil, ;!".•••:,,:c ,, e'.:'" 10j00 • t 4, Gre.enburg Road ' ',i, • ' •.4. .. Portland, Oregon 07223 )s..., • CoLinly 0 ........-,.,,,,,,....,---........ ' ciAANtoi,i kiwi.4f40 A00011tei • ' I certif Y their tic6 iIiii iriNt19.1- ., 1.," '. - -..: ' . Crow- piAkee-Raeford 000, L.P, :Tient Wa5 received For tbcOtci on the /C)j00 S.W. draeribtitg ROad '.."•..t..' . , . . 1 P oh 9123 g artiande Ore 2 , at.•„....,.,. .o'cloCit, .,.M„and recorded . 4 ,t•fr .., , , , . ottAlThli i rIAILli.Ad Acipiiiiii 'i"""i,""" in book/reel/volurne No,.....................bti . A.ritonlIiii ANiii li, kik 064e.... ......,.,. .,.ot ati tee/ii/e/initti.1, William Ili Perkine (Bell, Jaiiik ti Woutiok) ..troii.iiii uii il.. N Mani micro i In receptoon co.,I, ,) ,.... • ... ' • ,v 161 8,W, Main dtreeti 0cite 1106 lietord bi Deeds of said cOurtY rortlebei otego 920 , . ' Withatli'tey hand and Said Of, e , ';,.1. , NAME AdDaltid tit! , . ..... • ,.:, 1. . . , Couh0 diked, , , .-.- , yaw a thiaiaa li Naiileifed all fel'04114440i iiiall lei itiai hi 144 iiiiiithisi ii4ili.i0 crow-spiekee-tiodeotd 008, t40, ' ..........,..,‘„,,,,,..,....: t...4 , . lb:400 8.14,, OrdenbUrg Read ' !0:;a;.... tiii.i . ,, .,. . ' . „..... ,..,,.. • Pottiatid, dtogoh 01 ,3 ,.. , . .• ,,.. . , • Iv' 404,Abbisitid lip ay—,„.....,....„.........,, „„.....-.biiauty .,. - .. . ...,..--zr.......r..' ' ....-=,...--- . . ,:.!:,,,. .,.,-,.... ....'....,---_ ___.............„7....,..._-.,4,„;___.......?..,. . ,t,.,_________ ...„....,..„ .. . V.!' ',. , 1 4"' Z • , .... . ., • " , •, , • , 104? . .'• .. . , • / . , . , ' '0 ' --' • • .fed .. dddtti f t' Mr •A.,.. - -.-, ry wwee�A�eww�►� _ • '11{ i` • r, f 1 ' •..', .•t;.r �r- d-« PMCE4 I I I t +r r't' r ��' �r ;�•,tts , i • Lot 1l, and the Northerly 25, lent of Lote 9 and 10, Block 8, TOWN OF METZGER, County y^,•, 'r.+, 0 • of Washington, State of Oregon . � w • U , . tn �'r r ■ ,aW • i N Y art � %te • "'"F'in.k" ' tom',,y1, 3•T.„, y ,.' , . . : . .4-7'4. . ' , •& , ,, . , . , , ' ' - .41-,,,tH ' ; • , ..:,. 1. . . • , . . „ . • ■' ht ,'1 , , , . ' •.. ,,, ' y. , , , , , . . . , , , W+, ,, , , , „ , , , 1 , .•, , , , , , , , , , , ,. . . , . 1 1 !r • , , •i ,� • r i iii ■ r 1n i • . A\ ' ' • , ,h , �i 4.'J • { .�� Y�. !fit 7.:'2,,,,,'r1, ' y 5TA7�O E1iIB(3b 1 89 wo int o4 iNartrifl loii 'o. ;' i:lttaori,bitector bl Milliaamehl It Dotiald W. ps det of con. I :.. ' �� ! and Tie kg eai ctrilniy�dti Naisby bmtU'y Thal • A; • ' ►ho inbt uhsehl 9f Vaal i Wd rebeiyrxt ', ui in book Of of eaid cout>ty, • dnd reoadad I W+ i ' r Clke�ior b •` County Gt tt( t Iy'' ri.S. 1... .� .,.. ' w 111111 SEP 29 v,. A • . 1 ., ,. , . • r . ... t • • t, t tow tee,r!f-•+AfaMN AMe WAti DUD ilailaldweA or Cap..+,.ei, ovum..•Naas I.aw oU.1.111001/00 w„ •am,,,. .. s 71 TITLE rte'®AIN AND MU D"0 `..'�I �. I I r4 INSURANCE 0 2 5 6 EJ G �, I I Gw r. II , tt ''' "V' KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS,That Crow-Spieker-Hosford 088, a Texas F• limitled...patt,netehtl) ,hereinafter called grantor, for the consideration hereinafter stated,doer hereby/grant,bargain,sell and convey unto • • Crow-Spieker-Hosford 0117, a Texas limited partnership ... ' ' r i hereinafter called grantee, and unto grantee's heir",succauora and,soigne all of that certain real property with the , tenements, hereditament' and appurtenances thereunto belong,ng or in anywise appertaining,situated in the County • of Washington ,State of Oregon,deocribed as Follows,to-wit; ;' ' See Exhibit A attached, Which by this reference is incor'poratt:d herein. " s• , , ,•■'*\ , Vii., The sole purposeof this document is to effect a mere change in identity I' with no change in partners in each of the partnerships, nor their ,' ,'i interest in those partnerships. . �.• '4 • � • • • TICOII TlUlr,'ttetinANC[COiIPiNY HAS'aCCO11DED TN e I vitnufIt f.1 sty ruf,0UIST SS AN ,cc:,,'/t✓:0,i.r,y r41t Y,',"IV.,I,Ui 1.,74A1,11Nr0 IT f()14 140,1,Il O,P1T Y AND.•.'It.,,rMCY On Al TO ITS �'.. �; urtcilwf,NIIIrTint1'I.NYHai.PHO+ViTYTHAT • li AdAY e!OC�CNULD 7NCIISIN • �',c .' it . f•• �; (IP S►.v:!INSUt lCIlN1t cONtFiit DISCPIPTION ON etVTRSt 310i1 • To Have and to Hold the same unto the stud grantee and grantee's heirs,successors and assigns lorover, '': The true and actual consideration paid for this transfer,stated in term'of dollars,ll$ zero • .''••• II mfldwover, the actual consideration consists o1 or includes other property or vattie given or promised which i'Y; ; l its.consideration(indicate which),m(rho*entente between the symbol.m,II cwt applicant.;should be stele»d.Sue ORS 93,030+) ",;l a tfn construir,.i this deed acid where the context so regUires,the singular includes the plural and all grammatical changes shall bo imp/rod to make the provisions heraol apply equally to oor etidns and to inciiriduals;.t In Wititen Whereof,the grantor has executed thii instrument thus 10th day of May ;7985 i ,�•. ' '' "!!' if a corporate grantor,it has caused'il'ran el to be dlgned aril seal fixed by its oFNi'cer*,duly a 'red thereto by ;' H order of its board of director'• "'This instrument does not guarantee that any i; ;,,, i particular use may be made of the property described in this Instrument: A buyer should—. !�L—' v 1' . ' ` ' hec Ali th .taehe appronriate city or county Bruce E. Hosfor Fortner �' `� • •i' :NWAa: .„.rt thnnin department to verify a • p g p y pproved Uses: " ' srArs'OP 011809 STATE OP orisoolt Cannily aA............ ) . • County 61 ..Washington '' 19 . • �' li ...».....»....:1i,aJl».�.r..,...:•.,, ,., ..,,19.85... Personally ipp ttad r ■ • rr f .., ...,....,,.»..,nu...a„uaauu...0.,,,.,,...».» .»:.:............•.,,.,,.,rho, bolt's duly f7K'Pfr;, each toe hlmselt acid not ono lot the other,did say thai the 1ewrrier la its+ •' t , Personally appeared the abot'e riarroul ::� •' '` ,,.•»,.u8.r,Ape.•.g.r..,, OStO.r.d ,.» pre'aldent and that the latter la lM r , 'r L i :�,,C)r,.,a,, tutelary al .. y • I l,�'..'' `'agdaxlncwoledEvet M.tarvgalrtg wit"' ,s corporation, ♦ i,1 t. ai+d that the u.tll,fitted to glee toMgaliy lewfturr,rna'is tile ewpwatn oNl • areatt tp tort",l'thi 'i.�•, s voluntary,act and da.d, et said corporallon and the!laid'nab-Unsaid Ulm aldn.d end iiattad in b.. a t ` �� r '` halt of bald coeporeilon by iuthorlly at/N board 61 dlrackwet and each el ,,i• t c.a 29.1e1 1 Mom ackrwwlbdgsd said Instrument to ba its►mhint.ry act aim/deed. i' , Op,�p•t}•,��� / �� B.lcts net SL.dL) 'i G, Hat.. ` 7" ('°ZTL X. e r i , �Not'ir¢•. iblk toe Orison Notary Public For Oradea Slw'AG) • 1 „ r _ 9 ', ' C• IS;conimislon a,telr.e.. „5,-3.-•87.... . My 000uirilialon aaiilrast A, >;row�spi e}:er,klbsford 88 coo Trammel 1 i . P: O. Box 5396 Cron! Compahy srATt OR cote, , ,P.ok''tlan.dt,.CR,.,97228 t) County of ......... ..........}it, anAlayam'o NAHc AN°*oakese Crdw-Spieker-Hosford #117 c/o Trammell f certify that the within instill- i ' I P 0: Box x96 riiont puts receivtbd (or record on the I Crow Company 97228 o19........•, • ' i Porn Portland R ANti Abok'sri ►rACC MeiiriVdN a day of................•,.,..,....., ed I oiiAHTS i I N t .,...........,..o'clock M,,and tee orcFed ar»;ieet viWi imarai no rot In book hues1/YafUurie five..,. on ieceoeokii a can page.••' or a3.docurrieiit/lee/F4ir/ ! s Triurxne1l Grow Company �. ` f• P: d: BoX 5396 rnatitrtnent/trucroliluri NO, . ' Record o1 Deeds of mid county. , :• nd l R 9722.8 '' ! HAelt,Aoo'naee i to vbe l.ti.alai WiiiieSo fixed,iii hand and sail of Port a lialii d Airaiis li ia6 :d ate boa elvi'ellie Co+.tnt aF t • �.'' I TeilMine11 Crew Company �'I I P: 0. Bob 5396 4.co'-". 'i►ii ' ' Pbr'tl and 0I 9X228 tiv neputy HAM',,arena's.ill ii i r �aY/ Y+eI$ !G n , ,.,,:,.�.. .,�,:,.... �, r ttF ci . 1",4L;j 31'f! 4 'If L q) )1N'4 4',?", •• '«.,;.r. 4•.... 1' .ii/ t•t,+ !,v j./ ,,i t,y,''''',M •`.+ ,t 1..,; „,.pL h.'.�rii r.1'r i ,,,,,•• ••. ..;r., .., , •M 4'•!••';n�' r, ç... �1•r . "I . rr; � ii', � 4,,; .'', ti.y �'�kt4 .1:::: . ,t.7; i • N �/ „',!'),'A 1 f,S3e" / 91 • ,�' '•1Y ., 1.. e I •.' • .A t (. �•�' 1 •1 , r' k 1qi r ,C •,, •• .•�11J rF `t ,c �{ EXHIBIT A �'. •),y�,�w ".',,,,5".4' „5 fir;.=,: � j � . ,�l g '''4k DESCRIPTION SHEET ,a-k i'er . .,x' See Page 1 for vesting and encumbrances, if any. < , i ,`l1� Description of the tract of land which is the subject of this 1,�•t�`�,5. ); ' ,1lM' report: r' r2, . ..T., A tract of 1”nd in the Northeast one-quarter (Nei) Section 35, , ' r�4,, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, Washington 4, ' 'r'. County, Oregon, being parts o' 'Blocks 8, 9, 14 and 15, TOWN of ,, ,,,, • -',..:.,,*1, �- ., •.; METZGER, a duly recorded plat, a portion of vacated Grant Street '',;'!,7„..‘, 1,,,,,,:',', '' ,i' yit • ";i;�r7r) (Deed Book 278 Page 627 'and' Deed Book 278 Page 620) and. a portion �.,,'a, ,'' r"' ••.,,'". �'Ip .'4•,r,,,...: ,! 1, ,.N'• '' /fitM.'}. ��.+ l of vacated Mapleleaf Street (Fee Number 7'2,000127) , more particularly � . ., � ..,,,,,%.•„,44t y^, described 'as follows: �.+.' ',, 'i• .r :.e6 Commencing at the Southeast corner of Block 15, TOWN of METZGER, a' ,`,,',„.C....•.,.",' „,.•, ti'-14 t 71., 'J•,.;,ltr + 5 '1:411k, recorded plat) thence North 00° 30' 00'° West along the East line of 1^ ''r&;}/,y=, t ?'';. ■ te', Block 15 (and its 'Northerly extension) 325.00 feet to the centerline �r,,,i-: ..%;•,,-,,,11-.. ;, vacated S.W. Mtn leleaf Street) thence South 89° 31' 21” West ',;*r' z ',, p ',,$.4',73,1•,;.,":"`,...i t?.,fit '+¢•� fA`y; i b �, along, said centerline 100,,04 feet to the true point of beginning) } , ••••1 • 4r/ thence South 00° 30' 00" East along the', line common to lots 2� and 3, ft.,-,',..t.'41`,'5...1.'.,..9.,‘44 ,1,;' ` � � ° ,•• Block 15 aforesaid (and its Northerly extension) 36.00 feet; thecne ; 1;; '.'%.. 10, South 89'1 31' 21" West 118.Q0 feet; thence South 36° 34' 06" West n � ,►„A' ri '''•`”; 10.00 feet; thence South 80° '48' West 174.50 feet: thence West 34.36 t,e', ,i°1r•. , feet to a point on the arc of a non-tangent 11".00 ,foot rr'iius curve � ,ao,,,'-'r••,,�` ',, 'g left; thence in a Northerly direction alot°a the arc of said curve 'uf'. r;, ' ''�,�1'N5 + %„f :6.54 feet through a. central angle Of 13° 34' 45” (the 'long ,chord 3,;.; ;''r; ,,��t`;,. << ,, bears North 6° 17' 23" East 26,'48 feet) to a point, of tangency. +="' , '..L'!„,,,..,t, .f ;' tt4.` thence North 00° 30' 00" West 369.00 feet to a point in the 'South i "' `,.r.. ,•;,,,,,1 line of S.W. Locust Street, 70 feet. wide, thence North 89° 30' 00" -� iF,. �, 1,'� 4'`, East along said lino: 32 7.98 feet to the corner ocmmon to lot: 2 and :�`.. fir+ r ra, 3 Block 8 aforesaid; thence South 00° 27' 30" East 325`.27 feet to ""; 'y� �,;I'�� 'I ,, .l' 'M --- -------------- -------------- • '. -,• the true point of beginnignY • i ' ry ,d . " s+ g;e,, ,,, 'o,} e "r',. j i .{•. 1 : i5:•*';`" h r s 3m ryY t • yV x „,Pr) 4,4 II,* , , + if , s S�r • ' '� .' ,' r� )iltii�yi F r h ,1- Y , H fl It Y y ,k 'r I ,! v\.;,...„.';:,,',�‘„ k'w J , Yf 4 ' i t 4,� -4 t, • ."4 !)1'4 y 4 Y IA' 7!+'1 2,"� "'",'!'44 W ai • fix, st te y^ ± ' * :1,,,'::;,;:,`:.,':,:f 7 1 �,. M1 • yf ''� Report No, :34-125595 5B/tfk Can't P e�liminary Repo rt t�nl'y , g a k I: IS+Si i'r,' , • MAA3 (485) ��,. .'.r'.•,'�'�' •M "�ti r •" `,,','.:('1",„1-.,i,'a , f�•', ��r7�,• t .'„'! 11 ..• i 1.•.• T ,{, A tai � .� ,�r�3 d, ' �- e' 't�'‘,4".,'',,,,,,.,. , ••.,t., !' .?r•.•,.i,y:,.•:, '.• , r' , `: ,,1I•j '� .'"{;''')S,41'4,':,'''kty+ k. • C,.t f 4 yl C 1` M,,, ' L ; i 14 J ,!t..,, :",.'Nu' vy i �r,1%,, C, rt' e'a i ' ` •,f,. ,'�, '�,�°atFa ¢r,+ Y,YI 4 /•,,tJ .. , r1y! i1' 1,1 r t , '�•,re',7«}4,•k, it t'+ hi,t� I ›t.Z ffr 4'',• , r • ' .. t' ' .'r fr n ''I. } 1st.tiii ! , e r !!' t t r • ° . 4� Cr. � . �yll�lari •,,�, t Y ' ♦r N1V ,5,m,•t 0,p'M1Y 1:- t , , ., i 1 �, °� ilk. • r , . .Y,YP' µi-4•:,=;:q.„,•�, L .y�.f,�. ti 7, r sr,t . , "ii,,, , b i k, r I. ♦ - rr•'i1' . 11'.; t- '• N ' 611 !-i• •,t t' a.4' y�M4•{','31 10"Ci. 4.4,Ma•. ..,.. .1e.4∎1'. .∎A'.t�.,::n ■ ., +,ry..';,'.•x.1• �� I..'',H. ,%! ,..,r. _ �•—. ' 1,t.7, '' R'y"rr,!•,,1»,1%4i,4”"1' '' y It rt,i� �i � k ,' :.., ..".1.4•4`"+”..,i^ r• pp,. �t 7 A• ., t• ' + F!' ti t.';. d a .•' }. .. 1 �a�•l •.'i,Vl,�li p'fir. ���' I, Ii`,tA l' ,U,1t a A}4'''4'.,'..yS;'i�,,ir ... fi J ,ip Vii, ',,r�. • Y 1 ''r t • y er e a A ! 7 .4•,.'4 t i a , o Y .' kVA.r ,if / , 1�5 M J�, kui 44•,•1 � ” 6 t 1 t1!�r 1, � . y ir A: w `4 �, t. ';',,r+ 4 f ' (tlk.4 IN+ � 4. R r r i ! ..la. •±'" — ', � f'1�r,tiY.:�'' � I2 • a t 'i.,Cty, ,,lbli FS t. �{L a i•�'. O., t< t ::1(aa^,.,ai,a�7 1't"„s.'t F�r#v'i�,�t'0.d t d.a,,y"t a r1\P�:,,t xt;t'"3'11 x^+."✓»,7-"v..�v r.t,r;k,k • 4 .h' 'y. r' F tik 4 .y . . 'M i Y y e. ,.4',..,,,,,,,,, r n s ' A ..„4y14, ,..1.,y S,f R '" w„ M'�Y d "i � ' K r¢ � L 5 . •,\ � P., r , , is p k ✓fi { r,1 C z �e. °t' yTT' t !St" ' :.4 '.. , ;k A.. 1'4. ∎,' 1 Y { i t Q • 4 1.4,1,' ,i• ,,f `` , . 'yy �p4, }*,a/i1a,le ir' •+ 'na \ 1 +.s, tlr�V,,, �ti 4 lt,+1}�'ta,P"a! ;t?. ._,�r.+.'' "Z" t a '- 1*4 « Y�1£ Ya i �' C , Itv�, Yt. c," d y0, t co a L ; dln. nt ,91e 4 "; , t .�'R t.,:iid*4ti.i It f.,'*.F nS e „iyy e r i r F' *�''v A1}����7b�� C� '' 3 r yi h d �.P a t A4 '41',..4,;,,44r. SU ' ,4 *S C ■ ; ,, t Y tl b,' ut.xi�'" it. ■ w'a■Y�+ , '\ ' ` ` ::l:• A a S °'t , .N a rie. )4S,.1',1, r4 t +A"2 . „ S 1t j}� • i '. ,..7 c,R,K `y: v1.�y,i r, t. u y F ' t +�+ a'i ' tlt4 : l an 1O f �,iY t ,. G f{ •'t§, + r t .....k 4 n ♦M i t ' � e + S. , d"1 s 1 t, r, x , ' 4 q 'k qa , � . d. . 5 ' 44,4+,....,`;',./� � r a',Yx +" '''ii,„,!`„,� t {� Y t � i N;t s vir,,?v t c r ty . ,.a,0; ; R �,E l .,+ . f ,s ' t'% , � 1 t t p v,}v+,t n 4 er 1Pv "° t . j y * ;k +�. 'it 4 � 4r. £iHAtlat `, t,, k, jt q � „.h kR,, . iv L.h T w,y, F�1U y V , L.,..,,,,,L.,..,,,,,,,,,,,,,t ,,y t4T�1 viA n eg■ � f i, ,iE y i 4. s;} .1).'4, h Si'�`Y Y �b fi 1{, \ .,y 4y r• tt q v , y1 �jt i"V 3: R + itt 4 j ! t ,.1. o.0 $ 1 3 fi t \ y . A \ t . v, A id' . 9 � SR+" n` ' j , p "}r ,„' d�4 1 . T1 G Y .q {s .„ ,, 1 ,,,,t,"r* A»v 1 t+-r rP ^ + 41-v � a i F' l f y t s: a , ' `x � a �' t`4 y''' 4 „T �}+ � a I Al 0,4 Y', v 't, x .x � '+fi + , . + R a✓ 't#' }t'er V{'ki! 4 • W t''a t ,3a4 , �' 1.40,;t lt<+,t, , ' 4,'' ' t t t,,� ''t En; 3'k t1� ye, U M s ' ..■ } A ,R"i�a 0. , .. r a ,. s t,AK i' cw F',.k Wi z p ttv{ ` F f � T U y Y*,"' 1,, n i V.1� � y „ V„,,:::.„".,4.. +a ;,l Y 4 n i,,, xYtt. +i ,lk ',..., V '',';'s 1'..■ ,i a + ,'',' Z '',10 '',,:iFi 1V + i rt'` 1 F yS 1 ,,,;:.•,.. - 'p � t ‘,0\a '' + ,;y�sl P S„ i -,,, "(4.„ '? �} \"..,4i,„,,,,,..,, .� -vT ' fa, � 5\ y^ i ',4 1 « o f` ` (3 y , t4' P 4� � r n � �t ' t�' 4L�'l "�c,t it! f1)�`,1S G 4k j 1 , 4 hh ., •iP , , "�"14 t 4 �4 a ..Y 4 "':'',..:4 r 0 fY ' 't P � � cy t,r.,,4.,,,,,,,,4,4',V, ,, 1 1, �.+.i !. 4 ` � ",s k d au\, b E� ,v1.-.:1•,,,,,,,,,,,,..,,,,..,:-.,,,,.aY} l . Act`' ■ .t4.'!I . ..*:k T.t GA f ,1 \ x 't�iw�`‘ � +Yk r7k �y��rtifr t t:fP,i'y4,,iSt 1 �, A r 7' \ Y rA w g�j.� 'i h,r ", ,t yb t. • ,o 4 c� Y y t ....:,.,:: . � t t \Pa;r a,a}"` t i' �tF"�, , Mµ + 4 yyt Y,4 ' '„ "i g ' ° IAA y. i ,, a, \ . 4 , , r, w i'441.4:44-40 9 t 'a t i "�t " t{ i„"Y tt' +#. , � c • • 1 tx,,,,, „A y A Y;(,"$.,c , t }t f t \ '`j� v ¢; \ „! j�• �Y4 L a q K7" Uk .a tA J 't tXrr *Ail at" •,ya,\ e{a�tt, }Ir,.,�y t��w nA\ E S ` ,C k i i 4 M k"ki , V 'r,t _ A Vw; 1, Q 4 1 ,iiv ,i; „ i k ,.qt nr „ p yy n'' a ;, a 4y"�\' t ,,.j r3 ' t,'''' p' ' r�.y 4, s y4,�F, Gsik1�''''f i . *7'.3.10Q 't s "' - A&i1,$r 4'',, � , ,44, W � p l',,, ,'"' C Fa IL x �v4 t. . n ,1 . # « n , * N w iw�a e ar �a,r v y y2 � j�g��5�•4 e V P 'P a rP,,t i+'Z'.$\« .p Y a v r 4 �ti ?` ' n =� '''P i;d � 1? '' ,, S ? - : F+ -o �., , t t} �» ; � r x Ra M N"'w+h y a i4' n .+ b , l di y. ^; • 1}a.,,r, ',,,,,,,,::.„,,,,)4..� t `� �,i , , l, ` ,, . .,+ Man . a M . to .,h, 1 ,kt `A ,',',:t::',4';''.; rt( s.t t,i t 2 .„ii� ,4,0* . ' . 1 J " J" .rwa � e ;.d ;,. , r xr � S d '' a,,"4: 5,. i � « {,t y r ti ,, 4 „+{ tlt,y ■,, ,; ' 4 ' , - 5a , d, , A.r ' ' t1 A' a�t '' G „, t+,,.� s.+a„'C . a 1�r1 }„ , 4 ,,i-�2 3r l,.iy'y1 �t',4'e'..'33'3,4'1tltj i .rh {L+' !;9 A • v '' * 1 1, x' + t e >4 `j , A„ 1 '. i4'r ..ti t wj ''s":4,",.C11 .tp1,�t 'l",an Y.tka, e i n tt y . 3r\'t„ ' * '�+ti \2 i k eL .n r U p� ,r <. +n'�1,,,,,-,..,,,,.:,,,,,,,.....,,,,,,,,, J h Y k4 Y,t � Ai1 £a d ig . '4.,+\A4 t T.<1 r ,,,,,; �\V',F t V. a YtL d:• x't , ! • '•' ',r),.f�:.tt-•1fb :.-.*. , • ,.,,, ,.r'` - ,u' :'1' , 4 . �. .. 4Jr,1,.. 'i4 1y ' •� ' ' ', ,',..• , c.,,"• V,7„,.. '• , • '•. ••: ' ' .',•' ' •C..'' '• : •. ,• ' .•• ' .. , '• :. • . , '. . , .• 7 '. . 1•';;J . t ■ 1 YL _______.__ • , �' ' ' '' c,�, T1COR TITLE INSURANCE 2 :, :s xlcor 4 0 2 w �, o mli.1e Insurance Cor'tpan ', R' STATUTORY 'WARRANTY DEED 'y' • t t"RU�I— PA RR-.A..f suiD �P�S_ lilmited �arenerehi.p -- .• :`• - „ _ Grantor, ' ++. conveys and warrants to • •.' ' . •:—;• • . • ;. . . . , .. . . , r. r `, r,':' vhosa gsn.er' l _paTt:rwAr, ,.'': .. • i .,: ; r. •:d,* ' Y • ►. ''••'s' Granter, the following desei'ibed real property free of encumbrances except as specifically set forth herein situated in �y ALs h in s t o n County,Oregon.to wii: ,,, :N.•.� *a ', ail' •�r' �'r14 As fully described on Exhibit "A'' attached ' , 'w,.:�i i"k° ipq �' . ��' ' � ';.t ;t,1, , ': *Trammell Crow Foundation, a Texas general ,partnership, J. McDonald ',i;r'.,, . - ' V :y"S Williams and Joel C. Peterson ✓.. `'• THIS INSTRUMENT DOE''NOT GUARANTEE THAT ANY PAR11CUt_AII USE MAY BE MADE OF THF"PROPEITTY DES(YJ113ED IN 1111S IN '•• ?g.Y•,.'. ('4 STRUMWT,A EUYD151' +.lid CHEcX WTTN THE f�3'PROPR IATE CM OR cou r PLANNING DEPAI3Th1FNLIf'1 ERjp!f&f'PRE3YFD USES, ;• .'4 �•F9' ` . �U The said property is tree from encumbrances except statutory powers of Unified Sewerage Agency, .':.,•.1 I ' sewer easement of record; gas pipelines easement of record; utility easement • �. tt, t of record; conditions rentrictions and easements! +as disclosed by Contract �, 0 of Sale recorded November 7, 1979 as Fee No 79045910; conditions, reotricti tie :�i 1 i' ;',, •. , and reservations as net out in deed recorded April 30, 1981 es Fee No. !r' : The true consideration for this conveyance is S - 7"'•�„_,,,._„ .,_, Were comply with the requirements of ORS 93,070) r"y,f ' '�I .`"atrt'�a • *8 a •. •• .. , ,,.• . . • .• ••,,. .L'.R ,.L.7,4.7 f f P. „^-•.L.�. .4."••:l $, : Dated this M •ay of •' 19 **82034219; lease r,4 corded July 29, 1982 : HI. Z C R t l E R •5 F f D #•.5 .�?: 1 ?_" t, , • a s . . . • •• , „ _ ' ' f remonttrat cQ of record. �5 �/ ' . .''� „ Bruce E. on d, g' nerai partner ' ' ix� 'i �%�� �� , •State of Ora on,County of f State of Oregon,County bf .__..,r �' - g ' The foregoing instrument was'acknowledged before,Me this The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ,•' ',rte :4r: ',�5,; day of , 19 by day of . , 14,_ by <. '' "1 President end ` •s; •., , • ;t _ r_.__ Secretary of .!i•C4 s , corporation, '"^ • • `;'•'•" an behalf of the corporation, . ' g.• r:?' Notary Public for Oregon _ f..li; . My commission expires; Notary Public for Oregon ' :.•, '` My commission expfrrt; �' ,� � This Space Reserved for Recorder`s Uste ~"+� � �•: , WARRAN'T'Y GEt.D ;: vf' ' OROW-S�PTFKER.-HOSFORD #63 � :',i' r _ t,4\1 t11M y^�l\ :: • ��:ts CRS' —$ K —'fitl.a.F.�$.Il._�.�A I,sVA111 -- Until a change Is requested..all tax statements shatlt be s•'' E: `C :.i%'' f`" sent to the following address: �.� �• •' �" O/�w�l;-8P'1FK$it-110 FORD 088 yJ� IAA, P��.r+';' I.'...... . .a ,r:., ,' `, ' EIcrow No, 1 1 8g4y-) ,.Title No,,,..�.1.r : I ' "� : Oct Acr'recording return ' � r», �'� ' ,ti, —.. a 4'''.',.•• ' *—..�._.. . - �.•• of �'i T ' i'� ...� ` • .-'a F407 StAtuitsry WArraniy heed � 71cdr .• �, ti ► fry ... ,...7:::, r y • I lc;,• ✓,.. ' • , 1.i71, , I � ,, , � • •. 1 A t q r , • , ,r It'• ■ ' M •, u f . . . . , •. .. . r, — '• . , `,•n:•..." .rig: j. v... i • r 9 1 t', t r r .ff 4UNIMINIMAIIIINOMP14.44■1•1•4114111■1,1■444.0.1.4401,11... .1W„ . . , ■ • . . • • . . , • . , • . • . ., • , . ' • . • . , , . , . . ..,• • • .• . fr," ' 'S. ' .: ' ,a,,,,i. :le •.,''' •y. .'' , . ,„„ • . , . , '1 • S. •,• t.'. . AT • b' \ . • •• ,..., , . . ' f • '' ' ' . •• • . , , ' 0/.. . — . . . . . .. , : . - - .."• — , ' , . , . . . . , , . , . . , . , .,„... .i 1 - '.., °:...' ',i: . , •, . . . • . . • ,. • . , v, • • , . , . .•.. , ' . . • , , • rl•, ' . ..1 . . . , , , , ' . .... 'A.74eVrtilry..i. •••• . • . . • :1' ,' • .` ,.. •• . ?, ot• '••••■••' 't"7 "4'w"11.'''''nri'lllir‘ t- • • '' ' '. "" „• .. , • . ' .•(•.:;,., •••ih*".•-•••''';:;'''''''''I.,'ke.:', *,:l'-';', ,,r;,f, ,.....L.,,,,,:',2:-.,..• .:',;:i; ,••••'", ...n„,.. ..'.s,,,••,..,-,,;,.. it,' iv, .-7.1, ,. ,... ,'"''.' , , . • , - ' ,. .'. ;•4.... t;.V,•••••,•,....,.-iM'''.,4-,,,,,,c'7. ,.' '.1', , -":••••1•t-f,-,\4 %, '.'••,,,-:,..,,:.4''.. 4:: •."- ".''''41;7'1',''''4.'.'""::' '''.'prW.,..',„. t.:c.-11.1.7•4 •. ' I '• • . ! fai!.4...,.., i,,„::,,,,,;,,k,7,4r,t.:14.:'117%*Pf?,■‘tr•*41 'ir••■••!Ali,11''''''' 4',i')Prrit:."'",'1,i4, ,..,•,',,,,:-,:":"'. 'I'':'''''''.".'°" ..-• '"r' ,"", ' '''.'''''.-:''''''':'''''''' ' •i'• • ., hre''',4!..••••,. ' '%i••:..••s "'".•',,,'•' , 1.,;,.4 t',"$'.." .41.%,, r,,•:,` ., . .. . • , . 4.: , , , .I. ,",i':1'.:.'r • . . . , '• 7: '' . . ' • - '' ' . , $.• .„t- , , ,t ... • * STATE OF OREGON ). ., • -,,,. • • . • ‘,• ..'• 'eor .. COUNTY OE WASHINGTON ) • . ,.'-'.". ..'' •,!,-4.,:., . .-..:tc...:,....,:.. „..fro;.• • 'Xt. . • '-': 14,ke.si t.,•• ' • •?,i,l'on this day of June, 1984, before as; the undereiguedli ' ••••,'s! .. - . • . , a.Notery Public in and.for the State of Oregon, duly cbumissioned ,.,.. . c. . ... ,,,A •• ' and. svorn, personally,=appear.ed BRUCE B. HOSPORD, to me known to , be a'managing general partner of CROW-.SPIEKER-ROSPORD 065. a 4.,... , ,• • ,,,4 .. ' • .,..!...,,-,. • limited partnerahip, the .partnership that executed the within . foregoing inetrument', and acknowledged said instrument to be the 0 • .• l'i .......;;.,. . ,, free and voluntary act and deed of said partnership for the uses • • .• • 'i, ..! . .• 4 „', and"purposes therein mentioned, and en oath stated that he was ....• authorized to execute said instrument. • -:-., • . - • , ' (3,•,. . •• . . A . WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and '.1. , • '. ' 1 .,-..,. ' -AFL-, year in this certificate above writteni -.4. - - • '1,.• k: •.‘t.: . •4:- . ', ., . •••!.....•,-- .. L +77; • .1, ., ,..1.i.. • ••• ii, i . . . . ,. • . : ..t..1.4' .. .. -k i , ' • . .• . ,, 4' ,. . .. .. , • e•,,, ,.... , ' - 4, 476,, , ...„.... 12.4 ..A14 . igd.,...441. ' ,t, • 5 , •II, , . l' :!,‘',.. •WA , ...44., , , 7..1•4 • ,I,Mh , No ary Puh' ic in and. for the State of .....,,z, . 4 , . ..,....., r74:.4 '.... 1 4 'I'.4.:Y; Ore..... . , residing-at Beave to ,,.4-,„ . , . ., .,..1.' .i,,', E )1/, . / •.:),. • — j 6,",. ' 2.;-, , . „,........4.0.,,,,Lie>, .„ My commission expires: ..,,r'r;',,•.,• 4 , ,.....,.,1.,*1,.z. . '...6 \ .' i.,$.•4"... •P; .1k:' . '.'.;:ibly\4-, ''.1.`,..1 ' , • .IA , ..... .....40 . , • .. '.. • ' • ••,±' ' ■,,,. . '■•3, .V.V.• 7.,, . . . '..... ' .'.1.• ' ..,„ tav 6'D L IC :**P ' . :. , , . tp. 1,0.4,_„„, - . ...-. , ,,. , • • - . t'. ..-.*..„,..... .4,.....:,„ ,...;- • :,,,,-.. ,.. ....',..*/).",., ,,,v,:> ,.., '.., , .k: , :,f,.' . ' • ' 1,$114. . . I.„. ,;‘,,-.• t), 1),,,,- 1'. ■ „,,4•s.. , ' • t , .4h.•••• ... . • ••, ,•”. ',1;'1,..1,.t•,• , : 1,..l.t ., ' ■ ..... '4:.,.' !- , '"V•14.'7'4 . . , ' .•.' . ,c, 1 '•...,,t,.. ''.• • . '..... 4.. • ,•.'' , .•• •':.'.:"..:40"1. '''. , \ : ',',2• ' '''i,••••" ';'• • tit.h.t.‘•' , i • -,r , , t..., ; ...i ... . , •. ,•e....' k • :1 r''..q.. •v . • , • ...1'.'1 •' '.'' },..1•..;'.: .414 OOP''• ' I?4,; ..„, . 0 ,• ' , , ■,•4, , .r.' . '';#1 1 • •, •CIN . • --•-e.■. to,;1 ' .. • I, 1 'We • •■ ' X ■ ' :., '''...' , ,,,,' ' •,,' I ■ 4 11 41,1 4..,.., ' 6 • , ,o'I ,i r. , : t .• P..j.., ail, i , r „,,: . , %, . .4.6 , . 'I, ,•1:i 7 i, • ''. {,, 14! . ,A , , ' 1. , li`` • 0 :. ' ' ''' '''' ' ,''4 . , . • ' .. . , 1.4-4.• 'n:: : ■\4\) , . ,g .. , . . . • . ...... , ,...,.. • . . r. , I, , • . . . , ..et, ...t• , ..;,,,;-4 k.:,.. , ,..... ' • -...-p: ,,5. . ,. L',.,::.,' • ' ' . . , , ,i, j4t".' ', . • 1.6.7‘-.:,*,„; . F•- , gr::;:.,,.„. , iiici ,,,,,, , , • 2 ,/,:• • ,,. . '%,'N- A .'`.'; 4 ,''. , . ..'!'"., , ' ''' -' ' ' .', .t •• ,I.47 a ce..4. .. . • 4,..•...-..• , , - ,--,., • , ,,,4. 1., ,,,..,., .0,..01,',,,,„„••,„..,y,t,..,17:.',...,, ,43,+,,r 1 . , t„ „„^,T, ,^ i. ..44 9.-4..,..., p.. ,,„,.,'0„,$. t■., ,, ,,„o...^,. ,,, " , 4 , ,,, „sq..,■;. odll; . ....'. ..ait.t.4',‘,'1 ilt,,.,_,'',„.,.,',,,.....id.•,;•4!,0,1,,..4,,..y.)k•:.,.,,K.'2 1.,... ...,)....,,N#.,,,...,/..,N, at. 41.4„ . ..,%,l.,,,,,,. ' 0',-.',"4,.,' ,‘''''.' "":, r",".,.., ' i '.„;,, , • ''''' ".,•,,1 . ;L: q,■ ' 11 v•:''•%.•-• ,"""'"'''''''"i'''''td.'011.4....4.,,,,,•••?,.110•1641•4 •••••(4:444%.4.4,..e..,...,.1',..to',...g.hx.,..t.,‘•'!.f.-,.V. '10h4.2.4.a:'+.4,..iii.',:.,..i.t,t..01:,■44..m4.44 • ' .AM;4+,ir4t,:e.,,•■!:: . ' ' • •■, 1 ;.;',',.,,,.,, •. , . , . , r .. . ,, ,, ,., ,1 . ' . . . , . • , • , , . . . ' is' . • , .' . lb ■• • ,, . ; . . . , , . ' , „ . . . . . . • , . , . . . . • , . , , . ,. . . . . • , .• '.".. ,'. ',-.. ....41.-•• . . . . , • • , - • • • • , . . .., _ . ..,_ . , . • •Nt.,. ' . ! .. ••.'",,..,' ,,, •,..• ,.,1.• ,-,-....1.4.t,, • ,4i o, • • • ' 13 ••'.. ''•. , . • . • 1 • ,• .4,.,4;,, ' . . • , • ' . • • P . , 4 ,,,, ,, i• : '. ' ' ., ',... l'.!•,•, /.4*,,,.2...,.'..:,!.....,',• ...:‘'%••'1%,, vAy ,.‘0,,,,',1, !:'.', ..''... ;,,''..7 '. '' ' 4 . . ' '' ' . .• ". ' 1 4 '' •r.t' ''' a '' . q ; ••en • \ * .• • .1 A .' .'1 . • ' , . , ,.•;;.. . ' '' ., ' '., .• , '':," ' ' .' ', ' ." ' • p,, . . . ; 4 1 , . • k• ' ''' A ■ ■ . , , • . . , ' * • • '1 ''s. " . • , , , ' , ' . 11„,:4,;■,-,tv., ' .- ' ,i+ ' .‘... lc" .1,,, .•. r,i„, . . •,•; .••• 41 i r .e .-1:!7 , :%'...,. ..2. e. i, / . ' • • :' --. f . • XHIBIT' "A" 1 , ; l'-r; :.1; - 0, .1 ' . _ ' ' c. , , 1 ,,.', " ..."•`,... •,e, • • ,,, * Description oea parcel of land in the Northeast one-quarter (NEk) , . .....;- - 1 z ee : • of Section 35, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, e ..j.. . .1 Washington County, Oregon being parts of Blocks 14 and 15, e-..,•.. . . TOWN OF METZGER, a duly recorded plat, a portion of vacated S.W. . r• ;Pe , ,.... •-:a. -,.:;. ... .. ..1‘ a vaca Grant Street (Deed Book 278 Page 627) , porton o if ted S.W. Garfield Street (Deed Book 278 Page 629) , a portion of vacated S.W. , ":4':'-' 7•',,.. e:.--.. 1 4', • , ,. • •• e Mapleleaf Street (Fee number 79000127) , and a portion of an unnamed 4 I.11,•,,,, vacated Street (Resolution and Order number 80-129), more 1.:!': , '• ' ' - .'• .v• particularly described as follows: 1.1 1 . .1. • ' r Beginning at the Southeast corner of Block 15, TOWN OF METZGER; e ,ae • • thence South 00°.30' 00" East 7.86 feet to the centeeIlne of said , •ei,.• unnamed, vacated street; thence 89° 29' 28" West along said . -, .e„-. . • .. . ..... , centerline 170.00 feet; thence North 00° 30' 00" West 142.93 feet to ... • I .• i an iron rod; thence South 89° 30' 57" West 62.00 feet; thence South e, 2. . *e`',-,:>*- 00° JO' 00" East, 35.96 feet; thence South 89° 29' :28" West, 212.72 1 ••-• '•ele erifr'''''” ' •' '. \tit feet; thence North 17° 12' 04" West, 96.76 feet to a point on the . arc of a 112 foot tedius curve; thence 4n a Northeasterly direction ......:),.,.... . ,, • • .' g-,„ -.. .. .„, . along the arc of said curve 77.24 feet through a central angle of t„ . • :i. e - 39° 30' 55" (the long chord bears North 32° 50' 12 East 75.72 . ,.. .• , ke.. ,i • 4 . feet) ; thence East 34.36 feet; thence North 80° 48' 00" East 174.50, -..tt - ‘, , - feet; thence North 36° 34' 06" East 10.00 feet; thence North 89° 31' a.le . . -. . . • . e 21" East 118.00 feet:; thence North 00° 30' 00" West 36.00 feet to 1?,', : ', , . ,, ,• the centerline of vacated S.W. Mapleleaf Street; thence North 89' ' , f.' ! ,. '' • ••'' , t. . f... .., 4 ' ,t, 31' 21" East along said centerline 100.04 feet to the West line of , , - e• ,ee ' . .. . ; Southwest Lincoln Street; thence South 00' 30' 00" East along the , A ■•4 East line of the aforesaid Block 15 (and its Northerly extension) • j.e ;,J •. 325.00 feet to the Point of Beginning.-eee ..... I..• '4' :r.•''''.. '"..:•''.' f'e . • ' "'AS . ':'71• , 1' i, z • 4,;" .. 4,.. '..■?,-, c et.•• , t ' SIAM or oeteem . -",,fa, County at Wiiehington " ,..,,....: .° 1 n ; • 7c.: '„ . ' . • ...„, ''. ' I,Conild yot,41,)1Veits,p1 Assessment :, -' :". ,. `x„, : , ' ,,,,,. , and Tani*snot Es-ORTG*Itatlicier of Con ,,» * ."4- . • veyanoes ft5r$414.4csUrify,0 nsi0i*losciifY OW ,''',' '!.. ' . ' '- 1 v the*OM instruMt of,otTswiting;i4elL,waived ', ...... . . ..':,. : :• . . arid rilded M boaterevirmttails cotint■h , . ' .•., ,.. 1, 0, ' r" 1 i'k ' i . •i''.. • ; ' `'boliirt*:- ' , tor of . . ....0, ., iit- I• . ' AOOMIStieei Prii toltIon.Ex- '00clo,cillif oepetye;.•rit , ; •-• , ,-; ...- .r..:-5 . . , , 1 ". ,: ''' 1 •.•,", • , ..•.. .. C h ill ..`,. 4; , , 4,■, 4444! 57/' ‘ ' . ,,- ,,,,e041 i 7., -l'h 19814JUN-6 PM 1123 1 ' ' '— '4 in;„c?,' . • , , ■1 - . ' . ..., ..c. i . ' ,•-il ,_ •. • •,.: 4,•,,: ' . ' • •,..;.%,, ' •4,,,,A . •,1 . . 14":''' . .; ' P •.• : •• ' ,.....$ d ez, • . , •0 •••,*,.., 1 ■'• • . 1,.. . . - . , • ' ' 411 ■ ' I' V:.,■ . ,'4 i , . , . 0 . . „, , - • •••• • , . . ,.. . . i • t -„. • . . , . • . . . . . , t,'-a. .'- • • .-,,,,/ . s . ' • , 0 • 6 4. , ' . , ' ;.'• • • , • • ". r . • 1 1111 . •4,,.,',..;.':-. , 1, ;*... • ' " . ' " ' • . ' ...>' l'• . • . '' '• • - " * ,. „.,“,,.i',,,,;..;-- , .:,,, , .:.,,. ,„ •: ... •', '• ' . 'i . -..7 , .' : '4."...*‘:.''' 4 '�' .., ., .' r r :l `h e + r E r/°• 1,k)t e'' /.'„;'„1. Q•*. • 4 •/,'','.i.' .. . . . y . U'. '. i { r 4 `y w '`Ytj.1."o.t yr/', il 1' 1 -4, a �,w I r..'.c,Z fytl� -' , 1 •• b' .b �' ,- .... ,,,,:i ,te . . „„. 4 .. ,,.. .py co tit,r, ..,,,.., , . , 1 1 <VP : • ,1 9, I Al , . ,, , , ..,1 gi., I 4 ' - ;�..,. 1 0 (�ae••b�i90 ' I�''l f1 A 11 N 11 ,i,fii ul 111 B ( 1 P ,rya. 4 441 c 1 0 i l N „, . i' •w / '1( o1 .., ( ;�..v...+U`. yut. ..I J�J. g JI (Il . 1 •vo1„0 f 4 `.. f YI¢."� .. _ - - - _ I I 1 ' I N R" I 'I (' 10 ,m. e' r� , I- - - - - , ' I C I . 0.. .„ oI , ! W_.;r�°°�S a Ii N 1. or • I ( itr y I ( {� r !1 bti.I.Qi'... 1!d- 11.aY-.1, _ «..I I _rue-..,.l e. .ar.r L frr° 4 W. 1 • - _ - . ., . . 1 . _ _ M �._-- _ _••� IA _ _ - . , ---'• _.q,g' � N I I�. 1 1 r0t.,_ `I 'a.-” r,e' f 7 1 1 I I II,- ti I I "I 1t, t W ► I r 1 3�1},m I I� 1 _---•I � -----'f Ir 'I• -4-- -1 • 1 1 I I Id . t p 1,1 Br y;I , 'I I ..,1 �I ( 1 ' ' I 11.-.r'-4—'t-11.�, r-,—..m.— I. .r. ... .r._1- _ ,. ' .-- . P Intl r r' . 1 :., �( I I - I .. 111 1 IV _»t� Ip. W I jj1 ...°_J;= H KY.r r +' .. p ,L. R.•. Yk.1.°_41... ( .....b !b 1,i.B•-RA”. ,I a (i,ti, _.[._!w 1,:....d.I .Dti..1.,J•t' . t 'A r." , • .4 C•-- --wr-1.»P'.I...JII'�m-,•I 5 ~" : ..i_ �J.. . I s I I 1 I sr. '� I 11 o 1', r .:*• -`1 'i Ir`^..,�►.ae 'Y w+ t�, ,; 1 $ BN t l t s— 1 I 1 i D i ,�' ,. NI �: I I ► I N t 1: I Z . lal • I Id a� 1 I PO. P "' '1 ."N ' �i✓ I '' a U 1','', ' lJ i I k},....- i (._- _ .._..1 14 ; =1" --- - ... i, o to 1 G 1 f • -- -.- -t.'of_ _. td.J. _-1 L 19s, .6. .'nst ..J I It. 80 II::..Itt' !.V..t.0'. i._.lei; .cnn�: r ' r/r k+ rYN } 1 ..- 1 .. 1 _ _..rl .. . 1 I I _ ...Z T r r T - I- .. .I t..y ' -1 i1 k8 1 1 w I, It • ''1 1 • I --4- t ` t{ ■'' . d '' ® 1 y m UI AI- .__ .. �. . . .. r 1 ,i Ia is -. vl 4. 1 1 I I _1 1 w Ia m 1 m 4. '' h 1On I SQ ,+, 'I , ' ,�, rar Y p:.'y Woo'ep' . I/1'" w a I T 4 r'» i i M �.I I� '8 I Y � N $g g g � ,It t . i , y 1- Y•i_.r._ / rMwaiL.__. k',....a.._w.r...I_. 1� 1 L'' 1 , I.,� 1' - rr' r ;lg. / LINCOLN STREET• �: rr r , is .:. '- ' •: �, Yd Y4' 0'.'A�,.•�0 j1y� IYO' 140' 1 Y41..'r�•�:'?"_I bd ;,� .. 4.. I Ai I ..4 I W 1 th o e u I_ ..a. -. .... 1 'i ' N r 1+i; ; , r I I g; + . f . '1` r��' f s I X W I - t, 43"1,-11 1 1$ It t t• r1 ,;, w `16: if!a':. 1,'�: .I "' .L r V.. If9_ .,les its' 'f'. i I '1' 'L', I tr 11 . • . Ii`4 I _ to kto obrf)l'D .,r_ __ __ S.t 4 fdlp ''I ' ' j . 4,1)1 a �. E b 't r _.u•.;.--.�l1tlJIA' ...ILL'Y`.:_, A'• `1 `iro•pii. -I if Y - 74 1 1.6 p. .r ' 1 il dJ ,;,`' ,4 t iei ° pg 11 18 1 1 r 1 p .. .. . 1 01 1 'i ti h.N ' i„ i II ''.'#::,1�� ' J .44 440 4 �.�1 4 ' 1', M i 1 ,i w �`� i• r'I r O 1 : 1 N il I i Y • d �',yYl el fr,4 l I ., 1' -— ---4, r. I, kr,it-4 4'. '''.. .I ,l ` er, ..01/.1... r r. . .. ...'16. ..H r.fi V r , 4 t, . ■+I ei. +' . •, �rJe Y y" r li 1 1 y, 1 I, 1,4" 1 °r{ bl (i •l'''''''•f{f , J g 1(, r„I 1 ... +. ) r W ..7 II.... 1 .t' 1 a_ • i 1% t�1 r •+ 9 i I I p 'A 1 � 1 I k I I 1 g) Y r r .L,_ IV L h h..hi CI '� 4.411.•± �ri... ' ii +, 'I.6'. il) \ \ 1 i1 1 Id It CO : I k r$I Y%' \ •,� Y V y i1 r1:}. `I” w w�,' ..r w .. I'W • Y e, '1 !` g y 1 I I 4)I 'f N 4 ' to Ip i 1 N tat $ 1'lir 01 • I v 1• If W I I e 1. I ,' .,• Pi �+ I !.gi A ir_:_W.L°IL,.,t-.,,, Lte _.L±i....a.=4444.._:.o,,, u 1 111 1, ,.,.. r,.r,,444..4 .^ r......., ............ ... .,,.,, .. ,4444 ., ....,.,r. .,�,,.. � ..� .. ., � ,., _ .,. n w ,•n _ M j •8M.: .•,,. '' ,. " ,,I, 1..tt'''''•: "..'.'N,* .......'- . •••h....,...0).;',4'.1 . ; . ., ."1,'"'','.' ,',. •." . „ ,,• ,. .• , . ',.',•',..„,4',,,,,',' . ,',;:.;; .,.•:;.-+,.....,, .,, . ',4' ,),,,...r,;,kl.e , '''', ,'e,,i .', A. I"..,•• 4 .4'.i ,he,41.10)00z .' ` •• ”I, • 0• ",I. ''I: '4,. I '1,,-'..iti 1.r..1,'47,..tr.'..,,.,,,..,.",',;;;61:...,A4...,. 4-•r 1`. .V. ■il■,'il,"..: . , '. J' , 11. •w.. , Maga ae.oas-emtateory sera aeos'ket e,Coepecloci. , '- !V.V./IC.1W,I.,A1f PU...if•tap . ,2,???,,,,••••, ,, ••4 — ..7:' ,t•4:',',, :1 .`, ,..;,. ,, WAtfliittri D1140 8 1 0 1 8 7 1 1 eti: , „ ., KNOW ALI.MEN BY THITSE PRESENTS,That.....DQVALD....E.,....R.Q.L.LOCK,..An 4 JUL IA ,GAIL , . . A.41 ■ .1',..;:.fr.. t6'.''It 2'.,4 ■il, ,, P,OLLO.M....h tl.st)an.d_rind .wi.fe.., .)1,,,., , .. .. ,...,.., . . . , . .. ..... . . ,‘,.,4 • harrinaltet called the grantor,for the consideration hereinafter stated,to grantor psi d b' GR0SP.LEKER,- . . , .,i,.,',4.., . liflaEORD,...1,6.5 ,hereinafter called ,... - - . ... „..„ .., .„ .. . .., ' •4 — 4 ,.,■ ow grantee,dose hereby grant,bargsdn,sell and convoy unto the said grantee and grantee's holm 'successors and ' t:11 i..■'e'...' f,' . - . 0 assigns,that Mrta4n rid prt.partr,teith the tenements,Mrs.:lit,manta and appurtenances thorn:rite belonging or ap. 'i fs'alibli li. ,,.,0,,, pertaining,situated In the County a. Washington . and State of Oregon,described ae follows,to-wit: As , ..41..‘ ,.. ' f■.. 4 ' ' % *,4 described in EXHIBIT ''As which is attached hereto and hereby made a part •r e,r: .• ii, .ri 4 ,., ' hereof. . ,..... f'- .: i 1./..,,,,1:-1: . 44 I'■ :vas-',..0 ... . • ,0 • , , A.1,p., , , olit--pit.zart: tiPtii,F.'.-i/lr-'0T4-111:".1P14---, Jt&rti--- '**1: it.??c't; - , . c . : : 1........1/7.. 77-.3,..--. .-- 7 . . j... ' 0' '*1.° tts:11:r:""tfrIvilq(*” ■...qt..-... ',.'k .., ,, ,gd. . , tr—u r,••-•, i .4.11.1'747--41t11. -"I Ir'' :1-,-(41~-1 Ifyi'-. 4-*-14'1. 1 :..•.4k 4 '•■,,,I.4,•■•• ,,,,„ ...? ••4'. ,•''Ix " '.. •, . - ....: l ......,1 ...- ..„.1....d ali...111. ,44•,::..*WLIV ' ...' , ,171,22 II...! ci,'',:.4.1:..',• . *■ ‘.,„' , I tsig, 111S. .`l 1 ti `Sti' 1-114 r • .01001nu.,, . .7-1 . ;•••--111r, , .,. .1 , , ,.. ,. ../ ii 1414 II • •I ao ir.1.771 '7.'1) I.....7 *.'......". , .:. 4.0,•,,, i. ''41 ; ( 1 1 4,1:,,r 4.•,,,:,` I • • 6 .....-ti..........ir...,....11,......, 1....,,..41.......11,......11.,._,, ,...,,,,,I...t" ,,, ,t , .,1;i,#',4,,...1., ,r,...-ii,..,:,-,......tt-..----4i-...t.t.v.:-..-P.c.'7.-'r.I--t.'I.--.;),t.---:'t—II‘--(I'''''' I. 4,'• ‘'. •:e.-el i , . . ,...... ,..v.4;,4",.. .1, . ,, 1, ,? =, 4, ' ' 11 4iff. 1 1.41 CritiP4T4' .. ,• . '...fl'4.'. ri; ..***I". Of SFAS! INsUtf'a ti,o,coN1'Nut eesairtioN ON IVItaSE MEI qi:t44.1.,Z•i'. .' : 47.1.-, ,.•;., • 7 \O•Iti, To Have and to Hold the same unto the;maid grantee and gra:itoe's heirs .succetteore arxi amigos foram. ::•1,:,;:::4147,),,e,; , ... ' 4-4 ‘4*''.' .ts, An'mid grantor hereby covenants to and with said grantee and grardoe's heirs,suoce(teors and aseigns,that " " Vico granter(ia sawfully seised in fee simple of the above g.Into prsmiese,free from 411 encunthraza, EXCEPT: Tha , 0,„N1.1•. vt,..;:' :4 J4 • statutory statutory power of assessment of the Unified Sewerage Agency and the rights of the public 1.,A % 1 •.L17,1,. a in streets, roads and highways, . ...••••!,, ab/that ''`." ,••;•,* It y,-',-, grantor arill rearrant ar...1 forever de!and the said promises and every part and parcel thereof against the lawful clodram 'T'ilteft'it .4., , , , 1."1." 441,-% and demands of all pervone whorneosver,eXcept those claiming under the above deectibect enctunbrancea, '%, ',3 - , •,, ...-t- T 'to..-,,,•r'.4, , •. . 1 . I Th. true and actual consideration paid for this transfer,stated in terms of dollars,is$..44.4,41.74 ,t t).:', 7 gkitticktd0lt 44 XifliX)/41.01411/Y4ttitiltI6MolotK>OblfaaititX16.1(,01-XtirttideletlalialtOtX,110abtelit0-xlax>attOrmIttivettoto:vireseitimiknabt*k ' 1" ,'' : i? 4'g '4, .'....*.0h..f.' gSgillirVOCKR4dOt Wan(giocoostftAitiojoR(m.emienos between the symixt44 CD,it no4 applioebJe,shoteld be eimieted.See ORS 51.1.030.) 7 4 r 4. )364.4,:' :14,,,ive,...„ .: In construtz2g this deed and when,the context so requires,the singular includes ills plural and,ill graramedicel ..' ';1;;A:t'''N; changes atoll be implied to snake the provisions hereof apply equally to corporations and to individuals. , In Witnees Whereof,the grantor hi s executed this instrument his 1St,day ol. 411,1tle ,1981. .4 .),4 IF ',14Mit if a corporate grantor,it has caused its(wax'to o be signed atld teal allixed by its officers,duly au-hoarse(thereto by order of its bcard of directors. -• , 1,4k O.14.44 f..0,,,s t.r.-, , ? .4?-:,, ,14'"41-'4 Ili.....444 igi r cow.** ;; i 'lit 01141,*.p......i.r1...11 ' n .11111, :M. ', - •• ,,,,. otr, 2r fa-irfet '.'.6.**4 bck" - ;.1F4 ;:.'.• ,h41..t.t.'.,,, STATE ce OREGONI i Sh"A71 OREGON,County ol.,.....,,....,........, ......,-............,...)es. ;-.•. .?d,gi';',I,.. ',... is. •19 . . 'Pt ,, Codii0+ 04.....,.111.4.1.tI1.0(71.ah, •.„„.... . .•■ " ,,,•,,,,,,,, PeroOtudir 01,0,00■tired............,...............„.....„„,---..----end ;V- ;ir 4. ...........(41/1.".............................. .... . .19 .$1,,, 4 r ''',•''.{.,A,,4 !...,..4. iso . --,....who, boIsta e41y.memo 3;',4: l'..r. ...''.'' .•, v.. tech tor tiltessIt ilnd mat one rt..th,othar,did edge LW the/army Iv the . ,,,,' l'irs ' 0 *‘ Feroone11P kopeered(he sbeve earned .. . •,,i'161, Donald Et pail....................._,,,_.,......_....._... ...... .......................„.........,...„..............prseident end OW tieh tans e 1 e stse • ,., 4§1., ...g9.1).A.,51;1,1„.p.p...13,94....„.... ....... ...„ 1,. .-..... °errata/1r et,--..-...,---..........., ., . _„...,..„.,..........,......... . ...—.a overwadeao, . r, •fi.,.4.1.1.,,t i •" ,... i.' ....4- ....4,,,.....,.:„...a...itottartMr/ kx# . '•ilti j „ ostru' Ct;rige.a.i.*the itiN4 alii.;;;Y/te the iteudoind "18477,g;;;00411 ,0:ittarP"'ili waf'",t? ' ftt'itA 1 f,..9.,FiG. ' I....4ft:''', leisl" 4 '1 i ' l' ae ' n't de" 7,'„,;t1:Aokle—",10—"td Eh"01),40,119sirdz"1.7::„Iddnr.i....,./4,zifit. . ,y,n4 -.);• „ -, *,.. , .., ... milers by an tv , - stetussnstedsed mold ineininzuit it)be tie reasater,=I am!(*NIL sl„D„.„,,,,N,c" ectzt .'r' n :• 1.•''51, '11,,, , : '')‘''. 0 ' 'BOW r \ • 1,i ",...4A,, ' 1 ' . . 'Ow 4 bolero Ma t ' li,4,40‘,..• • '„f,',/,, 1. . ''..;:‘ '.. t .'4'11,4S,',,,' ",• •;:ootrePtchtzr.--I.,. , , , ... ._ 1 , (OPPICIAI. UAL) t .,,,f50..1:4 tt ','"\r" le,.15704 ti griks:' .•, 4 toe'.Oregete ?toren Public tor°nova Va...,....:''.1..,4 4, ,, . •- 4- 1,4.41fp''' !„"":. P' 0 I ,, 1 ''4.el,:A.1'.:;, i...,.'.v. '1%,t"„?.. -.■. 4 .:::.. '. 86;601 6/1/84 hty otuntehelea expired: vv.,i,i;', it,, ''I. "..,(:'>'...21,, „0,c,,,,,;4.•, ,ip, ,, ,..., v *P1'14tV''''t`. t '' • '144,1411,.k.,',.1, 't... POLI.00Itl.,00NALD F.. Eit JULIA GAIL . ),I lio.avy.t, ).1., . ,--- .. . - . ___ ____..._.._..........._. STATIr OIr 0.1TECION, 1,iii..:.,.,.,t,:en•s! ii,' ;,3,,,„t, i:1 , — ---,----.----,--,.......--, ■.,'', • ,‘ f.,,,,14'00'1;•flt ' ' .. , 4 I..'‘',1"14‘.0'",'4.:010'i a. .—......-- County of............—.......--. ' 1 .,::`;-;(iffNj'y.•41?±It t ,^ , •'•tw,.. „.',. 1 „ . 1+morrow,:won&Ma oestaaaa' ,0, ,,4 .:.?,,,r,• `,t ,. i oertiir Utah the With let hatatzt...' 4,,,,k, ."Ii'i,..(4'&'11,,V■:,,,,' ,, • 'I'',„• • 4.441.-i .';',., if, ikl„,gRat4.047itKER,-40FOR,b 061 ..,..._„,....,., want was rocadvmd far moosni 0 a.ithto-,3 , .,t47'5,etlitt/itir 1‘4',4 Ci• 'Ai' '3": 4k 4 . ' 7ta=4'' .',...'s asZ..41,...4•6....,........,.. 4.4 ,,..,■.,,.,,,,, ..Tr, *4,.,P•1; ‘ ,,,,,,-,,,,.0,-110 Oi......**............" ,P,.,...,,s,,,,,,,,,, .. .. . -4. - -,,_ "" ''''' ' - '' ' ,.., f...tt,,,,,,,,,,..ç)t ete.....—m....o'cloth—Pit,wad ticcvdriF44 `4''' '''''' • • • •J• c•• . . ■••'‘••••. ...1P•.. .,.„„4,41,,I ''V nt',,Ic'ec./ .+4•14-, 44tAirrtrel 4404 411.11 Ad1011KCJ , MOMS nettaryas , -, ,,t.c 4 ''•'• .11'4; iff,14•,1":..Ig.ci.: ' q4.,,4'••••••A•• '• 4'.. • P',,,,, ... ... .....— . 1n bac.lijeolgt romans.tvca..........,...--,--at c. .r,,,,-IA ',";...'N a 4:',,s..., PThit ".,'1 it.. , .. ,.. ,0„,...tea.,4,„}#4 pagt....-...-..-.-4ff to dovernintefikaViihiltA. +''''`,!" , ,,..!:',,,, ,,,,,,.''.41 .,,i.o . .1 craitt;Itit • ...i: . .6,......... .,, „ ,,,t4,4,1' , 1..,, :,,.. !..t,.,...,--. -.,S.4.W.Scitiltiattauttithi44-S." titta:233- .,.. •crai44 •4•••4',..,%,, 4 V 1,#!i,,',.i r'' '1,,',zoil'll 0 flittialtbir2 aft..0.=:::-.9.7-1.19.-....—,..........-. ,-- Pritnort ertr itarid and tetl.al c ,,,„•1/141:v7_1.i,,,,,• ,i, . '4;100. i..,'' 4.10 ',.)T.4.,314' ”-*'h,,,,.4.,,,i'..'.„...46:,,,azt..stit.xec.001tes,zoo. , .'" a , r•;,1-..A1'.' • 4,,dt:t..t...,:.1..'4,...1:44 'zi,.,,.,..i mew til*aid at tasiostamei the totem is do ilitIontee gloom Cotintle adised. , .-• r■•••.0.t• •..,, , , IfY..1'!/'.‘4ttt.'.'fIlk‘44", '' , 6,,„. 1.1- ,. 4i. ,,,, .shilengEtrafiMitif •. • .:I.,. A1.40.,..,/,„ , . . ,„,..„....,...,,, ,-:'P.,,',,'iv, :,,,,,,,,t,i,,.a.,.', ... :. ,,,,4 ec,_ i_..„' • •c'.4 ' ..,.......Averg..i1.11.14,4044."4"..A.O.M.e..41.tiRrAA.i. ''''1,'IfiO4',IYP:r ' a*'10 tit'',.'40113: './i kitaana.,...rar,..6-CUP%m'4 ‘,............•*4........ ',.:11:14;■;•1:' 'if,. '. ., .%'''',■ ..** ' ,,,,• 7.4.1,A''py'••.1 ,,,iyatiatdeaStritgQ11.:....0.7.2.263., .4. # -..'N, • ''l ,■'Ali elY04' . ay ..........14.41.41 ..--.....4._...................-,..--_,...-..., L'e4VrIVAi..e 14' '','-?.., '1/4.4 't c 44"•,'"•,•• : '1,4 I'' ,44.4 •;,,.1.., .., .,... t.,,, 1: ,„, 4,,,,,,,;,,,,ri,..,„f.,,,i ,-.4,44%.0.,,,,,.,.,1,i,,I)..,,.4...4,?, "1,1,':,., t,.',..,. '...,..civit,'4144.th• '''" •t '.).. ,.,. ,, . ',.. onvoor a'4".7*.1":"'"firr''''''InI9sirgi,";119$. es'. '. . • ' „ .. .. ., . . . ...,. . . ■ „. „ . , . . .. * . • 44.4: mW,6 �..+L• Jw,A'd9Tb.3•11... • , , :, ' 1 ' ''f0'..1-11, 1 EXHIBIT "A" e. a.. .. I r. PARCEL I: '"e'° !' portion of Lots 1;.and 2, ASHBROOK FARM, Washi igton County, Oregon, described as follows': •4'.; Beginning et the Norrtheast corner of said Lot 3. and running thence a''„it? •tx West along the North line of said Lot 1, 100 feet to the Northeast i"ei<�: ,. corner of the tract conveyed,t10 XleIford A. G. Hewett, by Deed • it recorded in Book 346, pa ye 84; thence South parallel to the East line ' ,.1,. of eaid Lots 1 and 2 a distance of 312.84 feet to a point on the • South line of said Lot 2; thence East along the South line of said t . ,n Lot 2, 100 feet to the Southeast corner of said Lot 2; thence . ' tI. North along the East line of Lots 1 and 2, a distance of 312.84 • 1 feet to the point of beginning. k EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion conveyed to the State of Oregon ' Highway Commission in Deed recorded in Book 515, page 6, Deed• �, 4 Records of Washington County. ■ if E' • . ...m Lots 1 and 2, A.SBROCK VAN, Washington County, Oregon. y 'jai• ,• ! t l .r EXCEPTING ` ,,RE 'R 't e Easterly 100 feet conveyed to George E. R. ;��,`; Mi?Ilar, et t , by Deed recorded March 12, 1954 In Book 354, page 16 i Records I G�fy��,• Deed �®e�ords o� �a�h3ngtosl County. 4 ;,c, �f r` I t,+'� by and y' W, , A�SO through those portions Highway Commission in Book 612'd •'"� �' n �ee►d, Boo ' 1 a ono conveyed to The State of Oregon, .� its Staff L. page 160, recorded May 4, 1964 and Book 863, page 959, recorded . ;`,4. April 25, 1972, Records of Washington County, Oregon..--�. ... .p..-.»- Ie4. O. , to, , • , N,t■ rrA`a OR On UGON di .. ti yn a, I, , ' e o R ® , „ c ; I ,h ,Lt, ;t {{{`711yRRR-!!0 With 14 Li .. .1 , . i mil ! ,�d•r{� \Nc, r •. , '.4,42,r; 4 qi......., ....., / ''=...,„r,..-',.7", ilt-,- 4,., ' , 711! o. , .4,.,'9• qr r f.i.1.11 F'i. r1i ';. I iF 'As f� ••� ♦.t�i/ �¢� �!'fi 1.''' Jrl1��JI '.'• 1'" r �. ` ., 1. .., ��r�� @9""�ttP � - 1 to * �-•„ t�A® .09455 1' SI JU@ r ,� � AJ F�j ? q f,ll�;t' t 7! �11 01 IND8xED , ,. , . . i ,. 4,1.,,10 .4.4,4,,,...1.4:41.,L1•J+ 'L i, , .•rat fit+ «,�- ,L n.4,c 1,. .1,,`•'L., t'T .:4F(l,`.1: ••7.1,"Ai.,f,...1 lid'• 1 'it'4 . r ,i�........r.l.�...,....+�....±�!•.'.•, ..+..+..1 -..•i . M1 1..i 1,''''.1..-1 t .r ''', 14,4",•'4,;le �'. :a M4" «-:.''',".+M--"" ' "4•.i. ',•-• I -:tN,.fP• Y."/ ..'. � '•r '., !,,:-..,-,,,,t-4,41,,:•. p .R�r.1.•'•:9- ..:, f' ,1. ..r"..st .•-.,r,... :,,., NI'� .,-r.,„,u', ...T:s r .4,..,:;,.,''�. •rl�•"•'', �'))!Sdr:`-,• ••;V.,,,,,:;.•,/,'?,., 4.4',..,V,..-.4.-,,-,.'04.4 uc,,,,.:y,' .,.ww {{..�.d-'”. ��•kD DI..•'.4{ '"''r -',,.t}, ��:.•, ,,'4•� r .'r' '•:•, .i. ',.�[7,�'y f .i S W r(,,, LS N '1^ ! r • �� '.t. F.. , t,. 'J � y 1'^„rri y a : 1 4114.t. , T'rS c• ��r"Ald�« �'.C�. r .:,i"•r;r':!,It , '. ,r`1- '^F: .u•+••r�•1. 'Yt �•:�.'" y ,�' ? it ?;„,H iS:•,� 1 ,, w f Jet, ., .„ :1 ''! 1 1 �,,'„(f - r it c.. t 'r •,,.r 1 k. !n• ,,, ' Y i � "+l., �r i.ad L��,�� •�� k t 'r 31 �A^ A `/M y” `� xl%�i r 'r M+ nJ• s« �',v. i, i I 1 t ., 4. p .. rl 1 SS • F9r'• "' � .1� '' �rS *,. a' a : v 7 r••. • .. I •1 , : a 4'i�w lap.^, } d .' i. . ,r ,. ,r,' .4..'eY°y" ,•1r.+: .,1.>0;,mrv.ivTy,,,'.;r4.,t∎o steno',rlt"M1hn•1,0*.i"t'ZOrriEttnie '!IF+ta�1�7�KCit 87033598 1.r (0 ' 1.1 < % : . r ---—- --- ---— A HOMER G. WILLI S, an individual, Grantor, conveys to LINCOLN CENTER ASSOCIATES, LTD. , an Oregon limited part nership, . Grantee, for valuable consideration the o11owtg described real E tjt I ' property: j ,j,P w ► See Exhibit "A" for property description. ": s s ' A • ' The property is conveyed subject to all existing easements, :gi n° '; *•�" restrictions and encumbrances. > . N • ii . 1 The true consideration for this conveyance is property or d ' w other value given and is the whole consideration for such • transfer. .e . ' . , This instrument will not allow use of the property described ' 4 in this instrument in violation of applicable land use laws and ' • ) regulations. Before signing or accepting this instrument, the I • rte, 1 person acquiring fee title to the property should check with the ! , i. appropriate city or county planning department to verify uses. . , • DATED this 17✓�J�{} -dad of May, 1987. 1- 1011'RR \I, Ar"-- hh Homer G. Williams I a fi I S„• N u \~ iE ' , J G N 4 ` 1 x t. ;A , o i ,a '.1iu .tnoma 1 ;. .;. ;, ,;t; e oing instrument was acknowledged before me this ,.tr ,44e% da'1 May, 1987, by Homer G. Williams. ' i, Y4 Yi .• i �' 1111`1' r Notary PUblic fer or gon � My Commission E tpir'es•w z 5 t '..' a a re' b: GHrALHdr ,. 5O49 S8&SD. . , e'- 0 • Yyrt. 14 t . . S •) , ' � � l Until a change a is requested, �l to statements shall b e to . . Y. the f aliow ng address: WL Corp. , 117 S.W. Taylor, Portland . ' ' Oregon 97204. r1y•. rj 1 r .. 10.1�: •i�' .r , . , .' ..•r�. �' t1• �,. r��,, 1-7i i1.' \': y„ti, }�I•'.''i'n .k�'^� � '��r•''I's,-�' r.,. ,' ��.�, •" .�y,i'•,••.i.... }r X'+ T''.•i, X11 'A' r . ' I i j• D F • a. a , . . icd:-...,,,.•: ' . . .' '' ', . . - : , . „ . ' ., ' • ., . , . . . , . , . ,' •'?.:,7,-,„ . .. , . • , . ,. ., , '', , , , ' . , , . , . , , , ., . " . 'y• .. , ,• . , . , • • .. .,...,„...,,,, . , ,. , , , , , , ,, , ,„ , , . , f'- ''•'•' '. , 1, .. . ••• ' ' - —w• • , . , .... .. . . . , . . . , . , . . . , . . . . , „ , , .• . , . . , , , ' .• '" • ' ' '.14111421.410:1,i(P,P4VVP:v,ki,44;..,..44,,,'7.,".* !.■,.,'•■. ;14,4fillgiattasivitn,:toi,t0914.,, p, : . . , ,,..... .0, ..tia,...0004044 , '''',..,, • • • 1 1 ,', , l• le ' - a , . . ,. ,1.', •''';,' / 1 1' ' ' .4 ' ' . .. ;,.„ . ,,: , ,,i, • • . 1 .. , .. ' . , 1, . . . . , . .. , . , • , . , , ,. .. . , T . •• • , • ' : , r .• ., ., : • , - .. r, • . r . , ,• „ ,. ' ' • •.tli■ I ',' '' ' 'r'• ' ,'.''' ''''''' ' . , H„ . . ., ... . : , r ' ,' . .., .' . ..-,, ,., ,..; ; ' ,'' „, „ 1 ii0‘' '' . , A tract of land . Ebeing 'part-of .glock 9, all of, Block* 10 and 11,.. ,..• , .,. :•....' . . H •,-*, .1' ' 1 , , , Part of 'Block* 12, .',' 13 and ,,.1.40 also ' . that part Hof vacated. S.W.,', .-„ ,. '..'Maple' Leaf Street. and-Vioated,S.W,', , HA e* ' S.W. Garfield arid S.W01 -1','„. ! yn , , . . ..,, !„,;.- .,, .. ,' ,Orant ',. ' ,TOWN 1,pr. laTzdup in ! the ., Northeast one-qUarter' and .- . „ .. - „,:, ,- . . • ..1.,.,,. , , ,, ..d,.,. .f, Northwest onem,quarter:i. :)f-SeOtion, 'Township .1 Sout0, Range 1 . . 0, . „ , 44 , , . '''':A1 ;. . 1 ,' West, Willamette H:Meri.$.dian0.- Itlashihgton— .County, ,Or64on, ' More . . ' . , - . '. -- , 1 , - ' - particularly,despribed asfollows: . .. . ": - 1, --.' . — , ,, , ''',' . ' .:,,,.., :. .. • ..- - ', ,' . ' . .,„.. ::-' . • , .J,T.,•;; . ' . ,4- 4: '' ,•, . , . , „. . ., , r . - 1 . ,1 .1 ,. ,. . , 4..4, ,., .. , . the NOrthwest'. corner of'Block,11, ,TOWN OF .METZGER,, .,, - ' . f duly' recorded.plat,, said Northwest corner ; being, the .'intersection. ,... ' ' ' ,. ,, . ,H• , . ..-.,1Y1. 1 .,,, ,- -4-1 . " ', 1,, of. the South line ,of ,S.W..' Locust Street and the . East line of' ' h'.- ,', . • ,, , , . . • . I , , :%f• .. , :,. , • .-GreenburgAoad; thence „North 89° 30'..'EaSt.- along the North, line Hof H., . 1, , , • . .i:.,,,, ,, , ,. . . „, Blocks. , 11,' :1.04,:, and . 9' ' (along the South,± line of S.W., -, Locust. • Street) , &':diiiftilxicd, of 406.;50 ..feet ,tci:a...poiht'pn the :.North :line ': ..,• .:.; „.. . ., , - . ,, ofHalock 9$ ,thende,„Zouth 0° 30' East, 369.00 feet; thence..on .a r.,,,,, r',. ' ', .. i' H - H . • ' " .. .. .. .• curve to the ti.,5111 ., 114.86 feet having a'radius, of 112'.00 feet Of - '. ''-.,' which the-lohT:chord.'bearis South 28° 52".• 46" West, 109.39 feet to ''' : .H ' H ' H.: K'''. '. ' , ..,4 .,,, point' of com ' pOund,„Ourve) . thence on a' curve to the right 149.88, ' ," .,.- . , .. .,.,,-•? _ .,:,,,:,0:3;0 ,„ ' t,.'_,! . , • .. . ' . feet having atadiuSof :134.60 foet of-. which.•the long chord bears 1 . ,..:.,,1 North .89. 0' 25" West, 142.2 6 . feet vthehce- North 57° 56' 21" . .'. . - • . :• West, 5348 feet to a point of non-tangent curve; thence an . ., - ..,,,,',.. . .- :••,-!. curve to theHright, 141.37 feetHhaving,a- .,radiUsof , ,45.00 feet of ,„. . . ' „. ' . .'. '....' 4.' "-'' ,A -wl . . -which the long chord beats ,North 570..56', 210', West4 .90.00 feet$,' ' ,,H,',- , 1 1 " thence tiOrth 57," 56! 21)' West, 74.99 feet; thente'ohLA",turveto , ,, - ''. ' -,,, •,,.-,, ,' '' .. .-: ' • . , „i,.1 , - 'the ,left, 73.82, feet having A tadius' Of -129.90feet of Which',the, ,, . H ,' :" _ , ,1 „. . • . ''.' ' long chord -bears. North! 74° 13' 11"- Westv,-,72.83 feet; thence soath ', . . : , . 1:, •, . . .. 890 30' Meat, ,41,.70 feet tO' a .point OnHthe East liheHof.-Oreetiburg, .',. , •:, . . . . ..,,‘ . Road thenCevotth 146 14' , East,, A36.18,, feet . to ' the point.of.., .. . .. . -...,1 .. beginnihg,« ' , . ,, , - . -,, , , •, ' ' .,., i(i*, , EXCEIP'T part of Lots 1, 2, 3, 4,, .5 and. 60, glook,,,.11 and „part,r.Of - ., tibta' 3, 40 . 5 and 6, Block - 120 : taken,; for ,street widening ' •. - 1 i , • :, ,..<, r[t (Gteenbtgrp.oad) , washington County Zook. ok,,Recorda .pocument. 78- 50827. . 1 . , . . ,• : , ' , , ' .. ' '' 1, .' .''' - i- ,• i . ,:c ', , ,, . , , . . .., . . 11 , ,,,,• 1 :, . . . . 'StATE OF,OAISOdN' . .1 , ,, ,, , • 1' „ SS- .. ,,• . . . . .. • . , .c, . .:t, .. . , .. '1 , 1 ' CounI,LtVt:d6W6,1'‘I.1.t1mgt:10,6Hirectoto' i,i' 'o't,,60.1. '09 . . 1 'd'Ta)(atIon:and Exe•Ottid10.FloiXildtg cit,Coll., .,. , , t ...,. . . ROB/Attlajt . 5049t■LTW\A.gkb ' . •• . i - . .-..''•' ' I' • ., — . -. . :, anvianhldereErilfdIittnitinto;nut,,hote,:_tcovi?dwricitihn6,014:blw.iYias.o2ioNceurniv_tht,f,d. . , . . .s.• . • : 1„." , , • . , , .....; , . ., -I.:- ' -- : , • „ . , .. :,, . , ,,,'. . , Doimiwsahotti:old040046it,ei'ttAttliti)ti.,:..tiittitat00:6,r.v.dx.I. ,,..., , . . .11.: , •, . 1 1 . , . .. J. . -. ■ . • ' '', •, . ,„., ,1.'• , ., 1 li'' ', ,.:•,,' , , , , . , , '. , . 1 ,'4'. , , , , ■ , I , '' , . , , ' ' , . ' ■1' .' , ' . ., ' '' ' ' 081 ii.11:'3-0-' Ali'9,5:3HH '. :''' , '1.. '' ,.,' ,. •• ';',,,, • . ,. . . , , I 4:Ljr ' l•' •''• '' ' , •' ' . , • ' ' • • , ' 1• ' • • • ' '" H 'l'' '44.:.:1,.',.t"'.. .•'::t.;•i,t,..4••'':4'•4. .•,.'4'.'.:*";'''."••••'•in..••''.“,.■S .‘,,i,... i 6,i.!,:''.,•1.:,;•,...:1;',t''',i fi.• .,...:li....•‘.'•1'..!:‘.ii,;:':' i'.! 2".''ir.4 •;•;.'•'', • ; 4.i'kt;••'%?:q,,''..',.. „4:44.'•:..',,W.,...,.4• . • . . „ ' • • „ I' ' • , ' ' , , . V •. 1' • r ' ••• r ' 0 , , ' ' , . • ' '. ' ' ' . ''. f • . , • , 1,.:..• ., , .. 1,.1, „ .. • . . , . , . . , .. , • , . , . . ....• •' •• • ' . irAe: ' ' •:"..• '.. •1\ )1 . . :' ,,• ' ' . , . , , , ' " .— . ..,.,., ' . . _.. • .. . ' . . :',',*"..."•'. ,•','.'•.., ., ...,••'.''' ,,, Q - F.• -4.t''', . •')...' '.:''' ' . ' , . --. ,, ,, , , • ' i:. 7,:. . , . ■ ' • ..,.., ' ., ..„.. •.,,,,, , ''''', '.''' '';‘t .'':''.'''.%'"..T.;.'•.".:'. •‘4',"'.:4, : *t••'••'••r'j•:,;.".r:,:i. .,.,. • 1...„ . . . :'I',tZ•,.-1''',.'I,..• ''.'.'..• ':-',: .4 ..- t. .''. s, .*.•. *.Q. . ''. ... .T.. r'." • X • '.' 4" , . !. ''1 •''A'''.*:;■*,.. '.', . • •t:1,, ,Y' ) . , ... ., .• ll- : '... tle'. - 'W,.:i4".'cii.."-' , .,..... ..4 ....• ., dir VI.1 '", 1 ' :,,■.: 7,,,., ,,,,si, ,,7;,.,..,•, ;,..;,,,..., . ...,...;:.: 1,.,;:f.,:. ;.,1,,,,.';W;64;;4 7YttVkt=:..t.V:"''.s.t..L.0.,,,,.. ''''' . .. '....'r ''' ''.. , . ... . . ..; / . N .. TicoR Tine isic INuRANCE •i...'''' TICOR TITLE INSURANCE 8 7 0 2 0 8 8 7 ;,...'......., . . -- J.,■• STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED ; ,...., DC/ROTH! MELBX , .: ',,e.., . ,3'4 Grantor, * t1/41 mover;or4%%mots to CROW-SPIMEll-HOSFORD #1179 A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ,J.;■ .4 Grantee, the following described real property from of encumbrances except as apecifically set forth herein altuated in ., 1 , '.• WASHINGTON County,Oragon,to wit: '' . ,. LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOC 8, TOWN OF METIGL11, EXCEPT THE SOUTH 20 FEET THEREOF AS DESCRIBED . ..0: l .%,'' • ! '■ \ BX DEED RECORD ) OCTOBER 7, 1981 IN FM NO. 81034230. T....,c.,. I ,g 1 . , . H. . 1 :, 1"‘ . . '-'.L.'. , THIS INS'TRUMEI,IT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF 11iE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT N VIOLATION OP APPLI. CABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS.BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT',THE PERSON A,CQUIR. U40 PEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SNOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT .. .' • .. .. . . 4.: TO VERIFY APPROVED USES.The said property le free from encumbrances except , ,, STATUTORY POWERS OF RECORD; RIGHTS or THE PUBLIC IN STREETS, ROADS AND H.IGHWAYS; WAIVE „ ,. , ,.,, OF RECORD. . ...... ;Iv ,, 4 e 65 000.00 , The true consideration for this conveyance is S ' (Here comply with the requirements of ORS 93.030) -;• 4%., Dated this 2 4 th day of A s r 11 19 8 7 I-) ° , , ..—• . , q.c..:,..,, , WASHIWTON COUNTY '• ,..,..,, 4 -,-, 7-.c.-_--e..--,-/ .. ,..).-,z,,,.,, RCAL PROPERrY reAwsreR nut DOR Tai DI or- allow r •:, ' :1# '', r i ti4'' $.12. t C.I.j_;?___ S'......,a1.1-11 • , , .:t;e: 1' •111-iy, ra WO DATE -- ' i ,,,,, State ofPr*njfey)414,cif W LI oh ington - state of Oregon,County of , ---- Tha),,tfeltgolifirindicatin4i4 was acknowledged before me this The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before nu this , . • ,gy 0 • ; J-. ,19, 8 7 by —.---.day of — -- , 19—by •,•• 'e,0 Di N.-.'v .41;114-.. ..-• . •. . ",,,i , • — . , President and ... , ..s.'" .... . : — Secretary of •' 4,' 1 _ 6 - ---- ' 1 ,..--.. torporation, . , / „..r•• .. , „,.., . , . ) . , ......4 Oh behalf of the corporation. q. . —L. /' .-/dP-.... .•''' ) , .. ''•.' ..), i •.', ,. lii No Pu Wit)4Ot,Oregon . . commission.expires: 5/3 1/8 8 ,,1 Notary Public(or Oregon , My comintssion expiret: i' ■•••.*■••••••••••■•*••••■■.• ';,' .,...... 44.i, i' WARRANTY DEED . DOROTHY MELBY 1 STATE OF OREGON y too AN ton i '.''. sa l ' '."., t CEOW-britEEE-HosrORD #117 O County oWistilwton totItt '.0 t- . I,Donaki W.Mason,04nsctot ol Assessment . . ,, Until a change It tequested,an tax statements shall be itnd Taixati00 an4 tx-Ottidlo Rat:coder of Con. i, ' "' / t r'; sent to the following addresst stoone.ae fix saki oountY,do hstet'l Dor*the tti6 within inaingneand of *Ming vsu recefved , •1:1 t - EKEFORD #117 , . .,. End recorded in book of rzcorde of etki Lounty. I :, „ .A. ,e • S" CROWSPI R-HOS • 1,t. , : 10300 sa, GEEEVEURo ROAD, SUITE #200 Donaki • Metsort, Director • • PORTLAND,OREGON 97223 • Meotement End Ttottalon, ek, '').'11 . . -..,,, Escrow No.133963 Title 11/410. 133563 • Ottldo County D , ,,. , : 4 After wonting return to: 41 ,-„,.....,-• ' ,...: CROW-SPIEXErt-HOSFOIID #117 . . - , i0300 8414. GIREENBLIM ROAD SUITE #200 .. t; : roRTLAND,OnOoN 51223 i987 APR 27 PH It 07 'ii. •,' . .-v.,...,::' t'lt...... 5•.m.w......wmoo ...........o....i..........r...........*..............omo......*....r.. .............no ?,...':' . L./. Thor Poem No.117 Statittory Warranty Ned 11/133 'J,i ',....r.,,. ' i ',,,,,.: ., ,,.', '' ', J.' , , , '. '. •s.,;' ',..'i/, ,.V.:i.,41: ..,.",,O.V(11.4t.,11,4*-'. 4' "i." .. ,.. - , 41,' '" , ' ..' 4', ' '" ' • ' A',' '.,I y. ",-; tr,I. 3,0*41.,„,4.$1,4'V, .v...r. t'l?.....c.'.. • ."-'‘. , I t. , ' , , , , '...'•., ,.t,' . ,, 'i t'iitiVtAito, -'' ,,,0,, ,,' ' '', 4 ' ' ' 4'' 4,f• .'\''.:SZ•••''•.' 1".,41 A.:,„,• ,, , ":.,•. ' . / tli 1*••:... . " *. • ' . !,,, ' *. I. . '1:''';?•.4‘..;00 4414';;""''sb,*:' ••"• ':(•"''' ': "" ' * ' *.I%1.,f, ` r1/4.,J.,,,;4,4,•,X4i,i,!- ,, , ,,';,.. ,;• :, .,, ;"'..,t-', ' ''' ' '.' ' 1.) c.,''''.4411','411..,1/44,,,%1/44''''',/ ;4.•'..,,,' " yr '.4''4,;,,,;;I:W4.1,„n?e*, ,'',i l'",'' :. , '''..• ' , ' '.',r.'''',.,4 P..st j.,,'pif;.4..?.',,,A,.., '" ',. l'.14',:tilL ,k;1`-'''t't'.1."''. ' ,, ' ,-,'",,,,,l'i,,,,,s,i,,t.lts'..iitit.47.,., .''.,.,..",,,','''..: 1.,, • ,. .,. ,, . . ,;„-,. ' .,I, , '. ., ..', „.,1,0„.. ,, ax -14.,*' ' '' .,,,,, .t f' 1-0.4,10' ',',''''• ,". ',0*:. •.,1. ' ' ,','tti ','', ' 1:',', 1, ---- '''.>:t',9,0,' •• ',.. . '., •,"4 4.rt"II Y.Q;11 '•••••:*1 Iiiiekt". ' '' ',••4} ,'• ,,.);.'".■ t CY•L'. 4'., ':.,-, ,,14',..' ' ',' ,4 i '•,,: " .... ■.: ',.' '.'., 1 1 . -, • . ' ' ' . ■ ,.),* '• -'';2 ..., .... ' '' ' • 4,, w. • ' ,, . . ,- „ kte ' • . � w« .a.».... �.• .. 4.,o-..�-4r.N.. ...-.:.w...i....w._ .._i .... ...-_w.,...4.ri.i..JurW:n..-,rrl.-..wr ,f,-�rt.luiAl4.........r-i Ir • yl 1• limmnieliCt-owCon'ipaily :f i f� } • v e s-!�e: r^i++r->' •�a- �>i!' .,,«b-�'iw' d ns.,��p7:�_.y.,;:,• 1 vuq•r'}� c- �� David C.Blake Partner „ 2 Y '•ISr A3 10260 S,W Oreeriburg Road I '' Portland,OR 9 (503)245.9400 Barton F.Mills,Architect N ING12114/M11.,1.,S, P.C. • etc lltti't ttrtb'}1•nsniitt,3utct s+t i ttt t ttt�C't,ntc't 1,,1111,,`It'ir•., !,r tnt 411.1 • I„,Ikt,t'tf•i�°r6'�.'.ft.t"t11'G,"i?n "�rt°ry°'» q i' �, • h r CIRCULATE, " BR JF3 -- R rfj ,•"C•;M, s /,.,--RC e. U• Staff Review C(crrh'<rr*-,) .,% DS CITY OF TIGARCI • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ,DEPARTMENT • �, PRE-APPLICATION CHECKLIST Date, / ci 113 /0 }. 1 APPLICANT 0AmE2.4, -. f .� 6—) Li OCAil (.6.7V rte . ", '' P 2 PROPERTY LOCATION • Address ' `--, I Tax Map/Tax Lot - • 3. PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION/NECESSARY APPLICATION(S) �! , , alege-a : .. ..'. , fig/ 00e0 0 .,, ' a . . ifi , ,, o 4. USE /(A. j Existing ...14" ,! 41;2/10.,.....1r0047.1,L • • Adjacent Property • dil north te'll,t..- /LI_-19 south d--'? east y / p ",�'''d' ' , I a .: west L l _ _ t 5. CONIPk'EFHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION t•, .D i 4,2444: 1.6:10&.et..06 6, ZONING DESIGNATION `" Iv "�1 7. NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION NO: g CHAIRPERSON , '�� rr `, ,�l . ;, ; •`. PHONE __k_5/1-' 7 k 8, CODE REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot size/width ell Setbacks: front corn r sides p rear y Special setbacks: streets. _ e;st blxsihed' areas S. yr» lower intensity zones .i tisetiands ,»._- j flag lot � aoressord structures w.,., z e'ro lot line .�, `✓1a3timUm lot coverage V5%,___ I Maximum building height , i 7 • l' • 4. T. 4, „. t r i ir Special height limits flag lot - oth6r" i' „'.. Density calculation , Density transition. -w--- Landscaping: minimum % of lot area _7514 w. Street Trees - c° ,...rI1,.I' .✓ _i i I+t.✓., fr.Jr ' Buffer Areas .. v �� ,, ,,, . Parking Areas /, 1,, ' 4 ,, ,. /,-,„ '�_' Visual clearance 0/ 4_, /:., , _.. ...�..._ ,e:;) . i,,'r , „; ��: Parking and loading �c. �..,�w.,.. kip,/ .�,: } 1......251)._._./Atf.I.ALI gri::. ›, .„...„.. , /4„.. L... i.4...4 "--4, . 4...r.. - 'L Access and circulation 5!// ,,,„, ..,.,:� Signs ;9. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS (See application checklist for specific items) Sensitive lands: •floodplain drainageway >25% slope. ----"7” . Wetlands "`""`` On space -..-..' 1 Historic overlay --- x. ' . .. .St et improvements/c0nnectio s/bike �s 4!„1i :1„fit,. .. .�. �y' r ! !” . y��µ le.',. .�+':1 A . if...�.+1.,' ,w.. �,, .4. lal.te' ire_ ..e,...,,✓'d' ., F+ ! ./ /; ,'' , h . frt,,,,, ,4 Right-of--way dedication ,,, :�,, ,1,,,i; 'v - `i . ' ..1 1 ' /041 ! Sanitary Sewer improVement ..,.,r .) , , Storm Sealer mprataements 1 444 ,r i y. 1 � ... ( � Improvement Agreement - Permit; Bonds; Fees ' A... ,, 'Ot er agency peraits f /' 1O PROCEDURE Adminiatratitte staff review I j I �/' , 4/i,4,/ '.„,,,,A f , Public Hearing/Hearings Officer 1 4 u.wr.�r n, ,I Public Hearing/Planning Comiiis.sioi�i The Administrative .decision or Public Hearing shall occur approximately 80 days after a complete application is filed. Ai 46-day appeal period follows all decisions.' i • (0573P/0022P) z',..Y \ , :, , i r ., A 1 tyy +` •r .,-v'+ "«���. 'Staff (r" '"•^ Date 'S T aM CITY OF TIGARD .; COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I, ' APPLICATION CHECKLIST The items on the checklist below are required for the successful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is " required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be brought , •. and submitted with all other materials at the time you submit your application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call Planning at 639--4171. ITEMS TO 8E •' BASIC MATERIALS INCLUDED: ,, A) Application form (1 copy) [t� f B) Owner's signature/written authorization [+J" C) Title transfer instrument ( ., " D) Assessors map [4"- E) Plot or site plan [!e F )Applicant's statement [ . (G) List of propert'. owners & a dress s within 250 feet [rT' N Film fee l 0oc�oo SPECIFIC MATERIALS • ' A) Site Information showing (No: of copies 45 .): [ • 1) Vicinity Map Cwt' 2) Site size & dimensions C'- ''' 3) Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10%) [.] 4) Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds 5) Locations of natural hazard areas including: a) Floodpla.in areas L: 3 f .•:,; ;.. b) Slopes in excess of 25% [ 1 c) Unstable ground f [ 1 r d) Areas with high seasonal wa ter table I e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils [ ] 6) Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive . '''''' Map inventory including a) Wildlife habitats C ] l', b) Wetlands C 7) Other site features: a) Pock outcroppings b) Trees with 6" 4 caliper measured 4 feet from ground level C 8) Location of existing structures and their uses [I 1 9) Location and type of oh and off—site noise sources [ 10) Location of existing utilities and easements C r' 11) Location of existing dedicated right—of—bays Ell' i , B) site Development Plan showing (No, of copies � .)# [61,151:' 1) The proposed site and surrounding properties ! . 2) Contour line intervals C 3) The location, dimensions name . l: � txah, ns and names of a1 a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways .. and easements on the site and on adjoining E properties ro er°t7.es i APPLICATION N CHECKLIST e 1 . I r • b) s,.1.,'oposed streets or other public \...,..js & easements a. .. on the site. �[Ili c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension [ 3 ,� . ',':` 4) The location and dimension of: �.. a) Entrances and exits on the site [' ' b) Parking and, circulation .areas C�''J'' c) Loading and services,'areas [ d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation C ;;' • e) Outdoor, common areas, [. ] f) Above ground utilities [ 5) The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: a) Existing permanent structures, improvements utilities and easements which are located ore . the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site C b) Proposed structures, improvements, A: utilities and easements on the site [ 6) Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions C • 7) Sanitary sewer facilities ED-e/8) The location of areas to be Landscaped .. 9) The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques C4 10) The location of mailboxes t ) • ., . 11) The location of all structures and their orientation Di . 12) Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements C ] . C) Grad ncl Plan Nor of copies ,.�.. ) g C 3 •• The site development plan shall include a grading plan at M, ; the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: ' 1) The location and extent to which grading will take e. placerindicating general contour lines, slope ratios ' and soil stabilization.proposals, and time of year . it is proposed to be done. C 3 •" , t 2) A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical '• , engineering report [ ] b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm . •A; •, ,. ,. .drainage service proposals C ] „ . ,; c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated C j G/1'Cl) Architectural Orau�in .s (No. of copies ) ' I The site development plan proposal shall include:. e ' . 1) Floor plans indicating the square footage of all ,,,, .7 structures proposed for use oh site; and [4. 2) Typical elevation drawings of each structure. C ] ` a1• E) Landscape Plan (No. of copies /:2 ): be 1 " w�''� The landscape plan shall be drawn at the 'same scale of the . ,r'I;,,' site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary arid shall , indicate: ����` 1) t escriptioi of the irrigation system where apiplicab .e C � E 2) Location and height of f ences, buffers and screenings C" , ApPLZCATION CHEd<LXST — Page 2 i'' . 1! r i i t • I hint' 8• t y;I - ? .. . '^, o ry Rii I II I � • r ,` 3) Loca r of terraces, decks, shelters :,.lay areas ' and ommon open spaces 4) Location type, size and species of existing and { L ;• proposed plant materials. PI The landscape plan shall include a narrativel.which addresses: r 1) Soil conditions. . 2) Erosion control measures that will be used. [ F) Sign Drawing/ I I ' Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of the Code as part of Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct the sign. [ G) Traffic generation estimate C H) Preliminary_?artition or lot line ad'ustment map showiri 1) The owner of subject parcel `) p ) ect p No. of Co .yes the ub� a � [ � 2) The, owner's s authorized agent [ ] j I 3) The map scale, (20,50,100 or 200 feet=1), inch north arrow and date , [ ] 4) Description of parcel location and boundaries [ ] 5) Location, width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel [ ] 6) Location of all permanent buildings on and within • 25 feet of all property lines E ] i, 7) Location and width of all water courses [' 3 8) Location of any trees with 6" or, greater caliper at 4 feet above ground level C 9:). All slopes greater than 25% [ ] 10) Location of existing utilities and utility easements [ ] ' 11) For major land partition which creates a public street: . a) The proposed right--of-way location and width ( ] b) A scaled cross-section of the proposed street plus any reserve strip [ 3 12) Any applicable deed restrictions C 3 13) .vidence' that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable E - I) Subdivision _Preliminary Plat Map and data showing(No, of Copies ) is 1) Scale equaling 30,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch and limited to one phase per sheet C J' 2) The proposed name of the subdivision [ ] 1 3) Vicinity map showin ` rop property's relationship to • �.�,. ,., g' p er relatio ship arterial and collector streets [ ] ; I 4) Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner I. developer", engineer, surveyor, designer, as applicable[ i I i 5) bate of application t ] �. 1 6) Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided [ 7) Names adjacent subdivision names of recorded ) of subd xv i or nom owners of adjoining parcels of Unsubd,ivided land ( ] .'' lines related to a Cis bench • 3) Contour l�n city-established -- mark at 2-foot intervals for 0-10% grades greater~ than 10 [ J • I I APPLICATION C�ECkLIST - Page I I I • Or I I i I 1 'I: t "t9Ntil Y t ^ /f • •' • ; 9) The k,dose, location, type and size c :11 of the following (within and adjacent to the proposed ' subdivision): [ '] :14 a) Public and private right—of—ways s and easements M b) Public private sanitary and storm sewer lines C � , •c) ,Domestic water mains including fire hydrants � � � � � [ ] d) Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) [ ] e) Watercourses space, C ] f) Deed reservations for parks open �pathways � � and other land encumbrance [ ] • •10) Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe' sizes indicated [ 11) Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and fire hydrants. C` ] 12) Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished` grade of all streets including'.street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision. C 13) Scaled cross sections of proposed street right-of—way; 14) The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overf low I • 15) Location, width and direction of flow of all water-- • courses and drainage ways I 3' 16) The proposed lot configurations, approximate lot a dimensions and lot numbers. Where louts are to be w used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots C 17) The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet:above ground level, and the location of proposed tree plantings, if any C 3 18) The existing uses of the property, including the location of all structures. and the present uses of " the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting ( ) 19) Supplemental information including: a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) I b) Proof of property ownership [ ] • c) A proposed plan for provision of subdivision ,. , improvements C 3 20) existing natural features including rock out- croppings, , ,� ] • wetlands and marsh L 0 21) If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably 4 preliminary plat, shall be shown on the re �► p l be incorporated into 'a narrative and submitted with the application, C ] .. J) Other Information C ( • (2362P/0028P) • • APPLICATIONS CHECKLIST - Page 4 • _ - t. , 1 h .....,,. _...-. ..,,a.,_...,..,.c..,.,.___.,...,..,_...._ ...,_.,0-1. .w,-, ,,,._a:m_.» _,. .4,...;-i._., ..u..,.....•..,, Ml.r... ,..,.,,-,,, -. .,. ,.. r- .-.. r•,i.w.....a..u ....,.w.._..,:,y++,,,..w............-_ • March 28, 1959 ar. ,1:, l` ` .,- 1 ,. f ' ' ' CIWOFTIGARD . David C. Blake, Partner Trammell Crow Company OREGON ,.• � 10260 S.W. Green burg Road � Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Pre_a lication conferesa,ce PP Five Lincoln Center ��. Dear David: , Attached is the pre-application checklist for the above proposed project. As 1 indicated in today.°s meeting with you and Ingrim/Mills, the project architect, . , the application ;for Site 'Development Review and a building height Variance nay Submitted •at any time.. The attached list describes the information to be '= ubmitted as well as the number •.of copies have also reviewed the circumstances surrounding Special�- Use Permit 87- 122-SU for the parking area located in the nort Y, tst corner of thr'"'Property , tl zoned R-12 Residential, 12 U:x.'W ti that Is presently g acre).. �� was approved by Washington County subject to. rconditions which q .1,,sito have been satisfied. , The City Community Development Code, Which now applies following annexation of the property in 1987, does not allow a commercial parking let to locate in a residential zone and therefore it is considered a. anon.-conforming used � ' Section "18.132.040 of the Code prohibits the expansion of non-conforming uses. • : The attached; Bite map illustrates the area zoned E--12 that is subject to the _ Special Use Permit approval. •� The construction of a parking structure within the R-1.2 zone Would represent an expansion of .a inon.-c©�if�,rYm�,ngf. use Which may not be allowed unless t obtain a property to is rezoned to C-P Commercial Professional). In order to ` `•; Development Review approval prior t City o n the pending Comprehensive Plan/Zon e Ch ange application, one of the site plan options must include a •'\ design that does not utilize the R-12 property for a parking structure. ' ', this another �logistical problem f � � fo y of but realize that this probably craw• ]. r ou, b • the Code is quite clear on this issue. Please .ca ., i can be any assistance. I i �" Sincerely, .• Reith S. TT 7. e � G, Senior Planier - I it • 1 , c 13126 SW Holt Blvd.,P.O.Box 23397, drd 972 50 63 e A , TAX MAP/LOT tiUMBEft. 1ST 35 AD/1 800,801,900,901CA FILE NUMBER: 87-122-SU , J-- 4801 • 5000 5101 A . . r STREET t Proposed 1.• . R .• Access 0c .41• 800 ::1 700 1002 . ::::::: :;:,::;,;:: R°°5 _ 8 01 :_::: , :.I 1•90 : , 702 .-.......—___Ii , :23 Ac. •a.. . i S VVsMAPLELEA�T • ,, .. r—T—TI-ND , . . .______...____---------/ 1004 , r• • , '� AREA OF CONSIDERATION SCALE 0 ; EGEN ARE o� i, to 0 ..' �P CA�LE LAND USE ®ISTRICTS APPLICABLE REVIEW ; PAQ } RD'5 DISTRICT (RESIDENTIAL 5 UNITS PER ACRE) ', `T' R-9 DISTRICT (RESUDENTIAL 9 UNITS PER ACRE) i , ; OC DISTRICT (OFFICE COMMERCIAL) 1, ' J' INS DISTRICT (INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICT) ; . . . ' ` I A, hh :' r n r ° ' - \ S . • 4 . . . . . • °� • 7 IA\N.,/ 1�1 V !11'X'C'" Ult.• c 'ql )) 0, 4 .7":or r •I � t / liT isP!, . I / 1111 . 41. 1/ ......, Is Ai-. imilmi 1 sw, 1, \ ,44, •• , , \ ali el .W. rIRCli ST. imam , ) / i \ \ 11,= i ____,[ ii lse , . , ��(! / 1 Y '!!_ !ZRb f 1__ __-- - ww 111 s.,. •''�_, )Al 1 I , [".1) *lb.. Fi. ='�� 9 :ti ' ... /; ►1► , ► '( WSHNGTON jq; L:r c��o igi IIIIII w , ,23 I 1-- �. w I �•\\� rf I 1 ,JiEI :::. „. / �� ` q, A\\� .w 4i SQUARE fir'' w �/� Eva 1 �� V�,.. r � _.,I /�1. ►1" -f 1•CRESCENT GROVE laM 1I 11 .LE" I. =III / 4 5W. 1 MALL I Ir-=CEMETARY=-=w li • '_ iriiL ' mi • -7 ?_b c L—__— `I• "';�� 1st 1162' VI Elli IN 26 25_ 111 ",• •1 91 Ill° PP , PP. . Af., I ,-- .. III CENTER , ___. - _ ( ■ p 'WAWA, Lr.-t1ST. ..-It A . jim pfiliii >m MAP'ELEap sr Aim I. \ n a II. :x wwr1 pxr ic �9 ' ,, i gri il MI , • . . At 41.•., ..... CC''Z gj ,\ .......::.::,,7•• Vil i "11 r z. \ ,, ,, , /\\ $ 2 li Pr, i .. I 1111.1' . V' .. , . Mil 41 li I 1111 \., r. i : MI 1,1 / , ,, I w • W oft ird I , ,� Emil 7--] iimpimmi, - IIII s ‘ 0. . imi dei a , 1 'Ilt 1 - ' .Lit . • . 4 "' ,p„ d RN s I iw. -- 31,, ii,_ ' S • Pr 14> s w ati/psp r4. w ;1� ; Jill1 I sf vE I ill p.1.4 •-v. i .910' / ono , • mil_on 2 . , , . .!, re...A . iii i . 0,i - - • \ \,---- um 1'S+! f I sm. •� HORVH DAKOTA '�, 1 i��' .,.STREE, 1' - . rim/ I i . , m„, Alk TOW f. ' 111 J 111111111 Litl LIE 11,111111 iiii 1111111,11 No xi, mi iiiNki . . .I * J 1 II . l” :'°'.11 . ' N tip 1' ' a 1. r , , Adr. lir .,e, . ,,4 '11l ! iHi1_ '.� Psi- . ii1117cM--1 1111t. cv. 11 r 7 ill!Ill rig, OW'Fts;AL Vr-rit...>1*. Mil 11111111111/9111M S'W• • 14 a e Ind \ \ \; III kb, ,ini&liti 0 , I \;,....-- . 41■4'MN I. , rign,t =min..44/17/ Illk te rag,,L___:„.„: 040.311„,,,, ;,,, NM ‘Mianiirm 1:0: AV .11: . • < Iffy,■ , c.unua 6.T.L„rio. , . \44, Arai 111 '' illIN III V.i. /04 40 5■4, . ... ,... \..„.' 31115 w _ 7,4rWAi: '41► • 36, '4.49 . ...'1.11"..i. '. 1 t ,, a il 49„ '4,,,,„-...„..i.............., . gir 410, ,,, .41P. 41)V r ,..6 4. . , op ' i'l All / , � � 1: ,‘, 9.0. � 1 • : I 1 f + � y I P• .,., .,..__.,.., _..._�.,.,,_. ., ,..,-,.,..._......... ....� ......,....,. ,..,...w„_„r .,,�._.,. ... ..i.a..4_..,.,..,.,, .,.•_..,.. .,..w._ ,U_._... _ ..__«..,,..LY..,w.:7.. ,.._...:,.,x....u.;»t..a°_..,a..r.o✓:rc.<u,a,.:,..,�.ka.,o-,,, - • Cx I i , I LINCOLN IV LINCOLN II . „ r ��■. ® ... WIN 1 I , ■■ ■ ■ ■ i . ■ ..,_.�, �........r.... / 1 . iiiii•Milijiiiii■ ■ _.,__ ■ ■ IN _ INN I � " , y YI �N FROM L �C �N � ����� . I ,', I 1 u H µ Y 1 i a I I , i 1+r .r.' . ' . . a •. r _• ••.s ...,,..,.. .,w..._, -,-._._, ...,....,.-.,.:a..;.-........-,,...''-• •••••...1...-..-'••--•A.......••,•'........--'-i-•••∎-•.•»w—.•,w.•-,•••,,, „_.,.__.. ,••.,.,- --__., ' ..„,..-n,rw. ..:..wf..•,,a-,,:-,a:,'.i..,.a...,....,...,..,i::.. =. '1 vc..4.r_1t, • } a ., LINCOLN HI LINCOLN V , t II ` ` j• .1111 Milli , , 3 i :, ',.MOM , , , 1=1 , ■EN 1 . 1 ' Nail I Mill , ■ I . ' 111Noliniiiiiiiiiiii 1 , .-''' , OM ' ' ' ' . . 1 LINCOLN CENT.TI DEC 1 , j ' r . . . I • •' • . . • • , . . . ., • 1 . LOCUST STREt . , , .. . . . . . . 1 { 4, . , 1 1 • 1. . . . , : . , __ _ . . // PARKING , . . FIVE LINCOLN CENTER ' 515 SP 0 . . . . , ... , . 17, - rill t / . , ,. 1 ,. • . . , . „ . illi, 4 ./. a 10 . , .1111111111* • . , . / \ • • 1 . , , . THREE LINCOLN CENTER ,. r . „ I i I . . I j 15 1-1 a ,..._ . . • . , . . : • • ., . ) • r • i 2,1 2.1 , 1 Z7 It IQ . . . , , 1_1''',1 CENTER WO LIN.00 ' 1 CENTER , 1 ' 1 r • .... , . STREET dr.. x I „ Yn/ r✓............rr! Y�rs!wA astir nrq/ 0... d. 1 • t I r r ' O A I� � \�� .V. I I I P i�Ki G /' �." )' 515 SPAC 1 S I I o 1 .. 0 .. . 1 • • t r • 1 , 1 i.5 r , „„:,� �, 1.6 1. , . .1 r 1' rye ey f I � 1 I. O Al I i r� / r n /1.' , 1 J I :, ) I I I M 0 I I r r I I I i „' `N 1 I IGARD ORE ON P I 11 ' . . 1 w r . r e a • • • r «..,, .... ....,•w..•.«.... .. �..�.,w•..r ...� .__ - _ � ••„-, ,...«.._ ...�. .««..a-._...•«-v. ......J,,I.i.�_ •w«.._..._t. ,.r.�.:Lsrr....-.r,w.,.K.. ” �•a��.�+®r+rte®.•.v. .... .. • 7 � LOCUST STREET • • IGti • • • 1 J tt4 • i r q1 ■ 1, • FIVE LINCOLN CENTER ir • BAR KING GARAGE 5 S; ACS � : S • • \ \\ . Id. II \ u 1 _THREE LINCOLN • \\\ • CENTER .: ' 4. / -1- r \ . , , N • 1 c. , 1 I Cr1 /`C LI�1C L CE TER 1 1 M 1 • 0 • a '• ' , w ..,�, .-r.,�., a.:...I.,w.,J.y..-ln,.... «,.nr,».....-..�,-W,:.... n..mldi�..ar'•..•.n..:LL.,Y...wir.,w.,,...rN1::.a:.WL.?�.J,.- .-.. I ( •. -..r .,.Jto.1.WAk:AAltawW-l.rr`.:Yf,w+�c...l ,'`. I, i it • • I •• 1 , , . ,, ,. , ,. . 1 . , ,. ,, , . , , , ,„ , , , ,II , , , , . . . . . . , ,,, ''''Id''''''''."."------7: , ' ,, ,, ',,, . , , , , , , „, , , , , , , , .. , , , , . , ” ,, , ., , . , , , , 1. , • . ,, • r , , , , , , , 1 . , ,. , ., , . ,• 1 ., ,. , , , , . , , , , , , , . , , , „ , . , . , „ , , , , ,. ,, , , , , , , , , • • • I 1 I I ■ F I V ` ! 44r • I I I I L..f� 1 7 . I "n', . ', ' '''',,' 'ff.;),,, ',', ' ( l� I. �. Pk I I • I r ti r i I r I �, I 1 1 , , T. , , , , ,„ . .1, ,:,, -.: 1 i,; 1 TIGARD, OREGON . f, ,„ , , , 1 I I n • • wI4.....,.. «._,,., ...,. , ._ _ .- .., .... u.t....,.-w„ai.,..ds,.r..._.......t..w....u.,.,..,u,ru,....,wr,..-...a..w ,,A',1.,.u..'1,.. i,�».....a.-...,..... .0 •.,,., - ,.,..x ',>Ji ..r,arJ.t..,-. :lisnG.,'....t ,iN««...,u n _ .. t �.� ^- ~ 7 March 28, 1989 //ru4iuJAff N �'G N ( CITYOFTIQ'ARD TWA RE) David C. Blake, Partner � Trammell Crow Company OREGON .,,. 10260 S.W. Green burg Road Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Pre-application conference .-".- Five Lincoln Center nter - I � Dear David: Attached is the pr_e_magpliqation checklist for the above proposed project. As I indicated in today's meeting with you and Ingrim/sills, the project architect, ��1 the application for Site Development Review and a building he_ ht y'.ar arks may !' submitted at any time. The attached bt—descr""�" es the information to be submitted as well as the number of copies ,r I have also reviewed the circumstances surrounding the Special Use Permit 87- :, ' 122-SU for the parking area located in the northeast corner of the"property f; ' • that is presently, zoned R-12 (Residential, 12 units/acre), It was approved by F Washington County subject to conditions which appear ;to have been satisfied, The,City Community Development Code, which now applies following annexation of ,,,-the property in 1987, does not allow a commercial parking lot to locate in a } r u zone and therefore it onsid "non-conforming use”. �' residential nd is considered ereel a non-con' g e . 8.1 site map thel ate prohibits the expansion of non-conforming uses. section 18.132.040 t f The atc'a rakes the area zoned R 12 that.. is subject to the I. Spe,ca.al Use Pexua t approval. The construction - onstruction of a parking n g structure re w Zt ha t he'R-12 zone ne ac uld represent an �. expansion of. :A non-conforming use, which may not be allowed unless the property '� is rezoned o C-P Commercial .�C r�mercial Proa.essic.nal). Iii _,,order,,„ to bbtaizi a bite f I ,,,..Dei•elopment Review approval. prior to City action on the pending Comprehensive �'� P 1 an ne. Chang .3ps i r� qtr-----in design not utilize he P, 1,o t� plan options must i' �,_...� � •at3.onr one f the site p include'. a /� desi n that does R-12 property for a parking structure. • t I I w I reali z e that at this probably creates another tY e I t c al prob lem f,.or you, but � the Code is quite clear on this isau PZ ass call � • if I can be of any 1 assistance. 4 sincerely, , ' I I Ke t S.h �, Liden � Senior Planner ' I l • I I I I , I i• I I I I n 13125 SVV all BIBd} P.O.Box 28397,Tigard,Oregoh I 9 7 223 (503)639 I , I I I .,.i rr..,r.,r n.,e rr .,„rr.nv.rr..,v n..e.,J,-. ,•..... ..._.. ,'.. ............. ... .....i,... ..I .',„ . r i...,,.,. ...., ..,,i.,, ..i,..,..,... ,.. ... .•.. ., r ..n u,r. .• 4 . r . . • i 1 .��• ,r I ` ' CIE COLATE ,. dr i u BR R W .GA l ; • I: c •-- X70 `taff. Review `(ivrN G106-Al i aS fir..--c..,,•:,c,Rr� • cr e �a AR CITY OF T IG 0 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PRE-APPLICATION CHECKLIST �... pate friAtkiLg ,I.,8 118? lcA4itc 1. APPLICANT. 2 QL c Cc) L.,A)GOLAJ C IVY 2, PROPERTY LOCATION AddressM • Tax Map/Tax Lot 7"--- 8. PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION/NECESSARY APPLICATION(8) O i /LT 00'0 0 . ...,4,_. ..... , rp,, „./._: .... ,. . . . id.:4: - / 4. USE #.44/ 7 • ir ' Existing .� y Adjacent Property ie 49 north South east f----/Z--:7//%!1-6- 5 west P i 55. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION A G,•._.,' 0'A 'JC d71,[4::',11.4,44,4_,...e 4 6. � N e.- ZONING DESIGNATION 7. NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION NO. CHAIRPERSON % '`,.. .I,rir...., i.e.,. (;�� PHONE e coos REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot sire/width 1 y y Setbacks 4 front 0 corner 0 s'�.de�` rear i _T, streets es bli shed areas Special setbacks: str as .�•'" • nes 01 "' +useLand lower amen �.t zo ,�_' s ....- ~__ accessor structures zero line _..., --�' flag lot �, � o�t,ir'es c� lot . aximum it coverage _. ; _ 1a imum 'bui lyd ing height v y Special height limits flag lot ---- other Density calculation • Density transition Landscaping: minimum % of lot area i 4 Street Trees .e= ''D . . . _. e .. wi.4 .✓ . ,C.. Buffer Areas �,.. � �� =�?`'� 4 ,,.. Parking Areas. 2. 4fi..,....r ) yl�.e�do .l.� /. •�'' •,. 'r - / Visual clearance 0 4. .,..,: ...:: ,d Ll' 'd ,� d e .. Parking and loading 0, 0 le IZ •4� . ',4.4o) _.. 3 c'.44_,2„ ...,...74_____Lt_____.L.4_,/liey_fri,"} Access' and circulation �Z._, r - ,,., ,o , { • Signs ' ,9. OTHER CONSIDERATIOIS (See application checklist for specific items) ' Sensitive lands: ,floodplain '^" _ drainagepay S >25 slope,,_,_, Wetland's �" ' Open space .--.,' Historic overlay - — .________. St r.et im�r'ovemen'cs./GOnneatio�a,/bikeways ✓. ,,,... d. .:.,•,, � -I'._..,o/ I.,, ...,14 ' r;:ii eta-A A. iir„...„ Right—o f--way dedication al ,.,_, r ,,r ...,. ��.,� • /f4•''-01. .• 474,, • 4;i1/ 1 Sanitary Sewer improvement A .I,...14...r:,4....- -. '; , , e Storm Sewer improvements I ... r''r. !fir ./.�..�.• ::-.4.9.e,/ %..:" a.r..nf, ..... l f 1/* Improvement Agreement — Permit; Bonds,'. Fees i iiii,,,, , . ' Ot er agency permits ,,i :•,: .. _ -.1. 10. PROCEDURE Adtmi: istra / r • n: ti Ve staff i^eview ' d � '.. ,�i '", , Publi c Hearing/Hearings Officer , Public Hearing/Planning Commis.sio" The Administrative .decision or Public Hearing Hearing shall occur approximately 30 days after a complete application is filed. A PP 40—day appeal period follows all decisions.' (0673P/O022P) i1 M - . - n r r' 1 d . ` • Staff 4 Date `t•' CITY OF TIGARD � . COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1 .,„ , APPLICATION CHECKLIST Y The items on the checklist below are required for the successful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies, what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be brought `' and submitted with all other materials at the time you submit your application. See . pp e your application for further explanation of these items or call Planning at 639-4171. ITEMS TO BE 1 ' BASIC MATERIALS • INCLUDED: ;. A) Application form (1 copy) [V1 f Owner's signature/written authorization [ .3 1� Title transfer instrument [ -!' 1' w,S f� I `� � Assessor's ma�a r) „,,.- ,blot or site plan [ Applicant''s statement gi" [ (�G�) List of property owners & �a,S�dresses within 250 ,.feet /(i1) Filing fee ($ 52.2 "-- »)� . 1/° eft), SPECIFIC ',�1ATER MATERIALS /, ' v��4 !' �P_2-1`.- A) SL for-mation shown • (No. of copies ._r ._"): [l l. i c i ni t Ma. [k]`�' 1:! 2) � � e size dimensions b9� c','c. S 9 pr.. ..'& -'. Cam/ `� - 'l'• te,. -`� '- ` 3) 'Ci5ritauF^T�.nes tat 0--1O% )or .5 fi=t'for r�ades > 10%) , [,.] 4) Drainage patterns, courses„ and onds-�:;.......-._. : -...= ,,, ]f' ' 'rte. 5) ., Locations of natural hazard areas including: ` a) Floodplain areas C 3 '" ,r-•i4 b) Slopes in excess of 25%, [ ] . . � tl ' � c) Unstable ground � [ 3 r d) Areas with high seasonal water table [ ] e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential [ ] f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils C ] , 6) Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive Map inventory including: , '" a) Wildlife habitats C 3 • b) Wetlands C ] 7) Other site features: ) a Rock outcroppings ';'v,t ,''3ri 5'L : ' b) Trees,.w -h-_'6�'`* c«kz er easured eet ] r ,„,...9,4.e.,i from ground ewes--- . _.. , le U). , Location of ex.istiin. °struct* res �ind...their^ i.tses-a---==- I G 6;ly,7411, y,1 9r) , ,Lo`La't orr,-and-type-of= fi sou r,ce s-.-4.-.2.,. ,`2 e`-,,1O) Location of edstind utilities and° ease ents, °t �„ e L, n � • - [', ,1) Locatior o f es �targ ded cated r a ht-o fua s . , . , ) 8i,to _Ue.veloprrent p n showi J ): �,,,,�'�h ( cs. of cop .es 1) The •ro sed site ad sur ,kNi..,.,..: .. �°�.�.C :: , ,,� 1) pv surrounding proprt�,e.� r .�i ,,, 234 (” 3 '�?;'�' .. 1��M 'y r yr�I`,ie�'Y, s r(i,'" I�GIf�'ija,; �l� J � 05 A 1 + ice-` _' ,�' dam' .�'`c�'" . � 3) the l�cxai.a,on, nsxons wind names of platted streets all: 47.1/4,+� elf,a ) Existing &1m1. & c►ther public Ways 1<.V"�l �ri� L j dj g y 1 �'l. /' .�''" and eas adjoining o i „. emei�ts can the site and on �iin x, a�.l,:,e properties t .p APPLICATION CHECKLIST Page Ph h, " W" 4 • ... ....,- I , b-)\ L.-oposed streets or other publi ,...,...ays & easements on the site. c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension C 1 4) The location and dimension of: , . a) Entrances and exits on the site *- •, •' -:-..,, E,"1-, , 1 b) Parking and circulation areas , A,T I c) Loading and services areas C&.-" 51,)-r-7-i1Qcio...41-:_iaajartf,47-iyi-dy-cle--s.-.4-bc0-1,atton ' ., . e) ,... Outdoor common areas, f) Above ground utilities C ] . , • E I 5) The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: a) Existing permanent str:uctures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on - the site and on adjacent property within 25 / , feet of the site [14 • ` . b) Proposed structures, improvements, : . , utilities and easements on the site CV] 1 - ., i ,. /..:.4—t ' 6) Storm drainage facilities and analysis of . N.C.›Ilt' downstream conditions . ' e4A--' . . . - .(.4 L.t' . 7) Sanitary sewer facilities e;/,'L-c::, „. ..4,. ... ,/ , ? L,1 .,A7.4-: 8) The location of areas to be landscaped. i1/4.....---4 _ _9) The location and type of outdoor lighting , <".*. -, . t, L.-1,24.-4 considering crime prevention techniques E•iir /' 10) The location of mailboxes - '--------Esq/ .: . • 11) The location of all structures and their orientation .1.1 :. . . 12). Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements E 3 .• , m 1. C) Graci412121211 (No. of copies ) . • [ ] The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scal as the ste analysis drawings and shall , contain the following information: , 1) The location and extent to which grading will take , place. indicating general contour lines, slope ratios . and soil •stabilization'proposals, and time of year . it is proposed to be doe. . E ] - n . ( 2) A statement from a registered engineer supported by • I i 1 data factual substantiating: 4t, a) Subsurface exploration and.geotechnical engineering report [ ] - b) The validity of sanitary sewer .and storm ... .drainage service proposals [ ] c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated [ ] i 0) Architectural Drawinc [X ls (No. of copies ' ' ,): The site develcipment plan proposal shall includet 1) Floor plans indicating the square footage of all , J • structures proposed for use on—site; and . 2) Typical eleVation drawings of each structure. 2 E) Ll.nAs....52,2921.ai (No, of copies 6 )t t'-'3V Th4 landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the . k 1 , site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall aitt ,,,A,Iii, 6 indicate: ...,4) DescriPtion of the irrigation system where applicable 2) Location and height of fehces, buffers and screenings [,hr ,.,..-' • APPLICATION CHECRL/ST — Page 2 , if.,--■:: 4' ‘,.,J1:1— " L. to........1.' „.1..",./ ....'t,' ''' ii ,.... ,„ '....te.-....-', - --....,....—' ----... ,. z..... , . - . , . • \ , 11 v a ,• - ' I .. _ ✓is ...•„w...u._.-,._-. - ., i x.....se.,su..,_rN»&,.w.,._...r.ar.:uaa1L,. .,.....wtia.:WWu4• v,...v. , ' 3) Lod` / ion of terraces, decks, sheltQL; play areas and common open spaces [ ] • 4) Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials. [ ' The landscape plan shall include a narrative which addresses: 1) Soil conditions" [ ) h 2) Erosion control measures that will be used. [ ] F) Sign .S aw ...ass ,,, Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter _ , 18.114 of the Code as part of Site Development Review or . a , prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct the sign. [ • st G) ra f'� ener tiorr .mate T f a. a r �" I H) Prelxmznar artition� or lot line ad'u.�tmen,,. map showing) 1 (No. of Copies es )): 1) The owner of the subject parcel [ 2) The owner's authorized agent [ ] ° , r r 3) The map scale, (20 50 1401 or 200 feet--1), inch north arrow and date [ ] 4) Description of parcel location and boundaries [' '] 5) Location,' width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel [ ] 6) Location of all permanent buildings on and within r • 25 feet of all property lines 7). Location and width of all water courses [ • trees w�' , 8 Location ,of any tee with 6" or greater caliper at g P 4 feet above ground level [ j 9). All slopes rester than 25 [ ] ' 10) Location of existing utilities and utility easements [ ' 11) —For major land partition which creates.a public street: i'. a) The' proposed right-of-way location and width t ] ' b) A scaled cross-section of the proposed street ff . d plus any reserve strip, [ ] _. 12) Any applicable deed restrictions [ ] s° . 13) Evidence' that land partition will not preclude ., efficient future land division where applicable [ ] . - I) Subdivision Rreliminar t• Plat „Ma and p data shown (No. of Copies ): 1) Scale equaling 80,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch ; , and limited to one phase per sheet ' [ ] 2) The proposed name of the subdivision vision C 1 3) Vicinity map sowing property's relationship to . arterial and collector streets C 4. 4) Names, addresses and telephone., numbers of the owner 4 developer, engineer, sur*veyer,4 designer, az applicableE 5) Date of application • Boundary lines o� to n � [ ] 7) Nam es of ad scent srb< iuis ion or names of recorded , I owners of adjoining parcels of unsubdivided land E 8) Contour lines relat !id, to a City—established bench— - � intervals 4-10 grades greater.._ bench- mark at 2—foot ir�1t�!t���a�.s foie e.� I than 10 [ ] ' I • kip l' e • r . • • � 3 3 IL/ .< w � N L 0 1� '!!d1/1L �t j/qry/,•//dyjprygyngy/L/ny...„,,..,„„.,,,„,,vn„„,„,w tfmlrn/i 1i•ynN✓/uI•ak/iNI�'1///n1l�d/nnl.•:!!iI//O_7/d y/4/_.:Y//fi!//dIA US 17j//A7�p/i//II/!//.....HNLiY/.7H7.....J/wAvo////IN.YYNJlI3,44•A/!///!W.,..MYIonw..i'iJ//J1//!/I//d/�/di.'%/.%/l//I////,ryf.w.tA'CI/1/Y///..11/7./..%//!///I4,we.` -- - $•-. DEGUL 1:11,753,0«,«,,,,,,..,---....„..........„,„„_ .. °_ 753- _ - - -- - - - - _ .�, W 1~ .,. - 0-; -30_ 3Q+ -50.••---•.-o-..:- -°SD _ • -30 '-�,.,.. SO SQ SO ti _ r (CR. 6p0`NIDTH I f . - - - - _ - • _- - 4060. ..30 ;'^' ,wa SO.- _ S 6` 5A ? SO SO 50 - `SD' 50 54 -50 50- 50 -_-5p _ _ • ea =1000 1 1002 3zTjz ''• 1 7G0 5003 !E2�- 400 202 203 204 �- t, 1000SC. s£ ' 2.'9/AC_ I 1< -�.' •'oa # _23 AC. ° .78` &1 I ..D- .69.4C 22 AC .24 C �,'-35 AC. F .toss 4 le 4 3 2 I 21 a 3 a 1 El Ig 4 3 2 t --1° - $ 4- 3 O 2bb _°o o Z a°4 3 2 1 8i I8 4 La -�- F -I- I I .•-:,»:n�+tar..•s` +'��' _ l�`7_ .Fj/6AC o�-'s�i I Ittrff - c L._ ' '�-' �' -¢O. ¢- -b-' 900 _ i.,. 50 d 80 _ Q' -d- .�•- �1- c1 .- - •+ }•-�r_ av i _r N�.'- 100 50 ® 4 W T-" _ _ { f"-E3� gt t,.-c�i° 5 IZ gi-1.i.- ° °-_ 0 56Ac. 701 a ( 11_1_,14.„,„1' INS N I 5 9 12 °i�m`�%i.l to 5 8 12 .°, > ,� `4 7. 12 2 -!2 5 �w 12 g[ ;° F,5 .c. Y' 23 A» I �7 L „. 'TCSt•=- - -- - r(R 2S� - + -Y° Tyr - - - L� - 100- Gi. 162301 -3250 1311 IS), - - - - - i• : 4 00 -h, 1g 6 Et r.r-Z-•-. Ic� 6 I t ° a ° !�- ° 1 odli.- - SEE K3 F° t Q ,ot r- i° 6 .-+ $ n ai'' IIz6Q �:u 1 c�i try o: a`'rn ?�� ° E" Q' 0 6 l � �;' S !�„¢'BAi u �` o ,..-�iL -Y + 'Y' ->''' ¢"-..' ¢Q•:: 1 e s¢` F rg. 1 #' ! ! �I ;� °_ - 1 :ra .+.+..--N 702 SOO _ vL. - 'so- 30�'lea�°� o! t$ o- ° _�+ -. • J .23 AC °-.34.4C. g ° ! t ?-' 4 7 7 8 9 IO of Is- 8 9 10 gi 1O- o I. a °_o °e g °- �'� r f t I I ( 7 8 9 10-. 7 8 9 10 -:_ 7 8 -"3 10 ti=3 °°I i$717 E a 1 t i Z I I 1 11413 - 30-.I 5'2--b-50 SQ 4-- SQ 50 13 50 SO SO • t, 1'- -�- -�-- - -1- --a L- -. tr-- _ -=.., , 50 d '30 ` 50 SO try_ -- _ - 'i•� -- _ �. 5a 50 $O SO 5D SD t33C 1 - - - -- _ / � ' g VACATED A/O T9-127- . VACATED 11/0 T3-232 tD r 1-' •r- -' (� 1 P TQ. i:7 1- sQ -i ?' STY-r sn -�t sa Y- 30 Y D`� so -r ao sq f*-Y . -i-- (C R t5t]8-so iroTH) _ #003 Sa,_4- sa"�50 L • 3Q sD so • sQ so So so so Y So so• 4 _ in 2800 290! 3E./SAC I I3c• 114 so - a- .- .'•1'N 69°31'21'E'' 1 ( -�° a I !0 4 3 2 i Ell sa a ea°ae E= $ i,1'J .I2AG 37AC # 1 { _ s� 3' i gi I_4 3 2 t • 0 4 a t l _ 9aaD _ is" _ N a Q 3 ° 7. 10 4 3 2 i sl °0 4 ,t . 4 'i_.„ I -4.-J\lt [ iJ*` ° (004 -.-r 1 0 I f ey { I .4.; ! I•/ _ 4c,c Z54AG J- e L. �r �'- - ...t Ii' I t ( A �3t r T .,! !/ETZGER ELEMENTARY 5 °,I: N jg. 5 L"� 412 r: g o :::.".1.7::::„ 0 100 100 --•n SCH L DISTRICT'193 o i. t2 5 t2 # o ✓15 IF. 5 ° f� pp 17 ° 10 5 : ;sit 13 1iN• 14 r I i2 - �, 5 t2 i IR 5 12 >nl 4 -:-.- f- -4- a + O+L- i" 6 tt ° I 6 II °°#+r -- '.. 6 !I r'. g 6 11 21 ;-:4#0 6 11 g1 '--tag 6 r � ".� --•x- ..?fig o i•. •< r:fu° €- .v - - a� ± - >a!� _.k,-t- tea=:. rJ=� ¢ _1> _> r* .. a g-r•-•-10 gl -54:4- 7 10 015 J1 k i= t.:tr-- glzTt'1 2l I°+ In 7 10 r- °` ••� I° 7 10 g - R 7 7 ►0 '` At!,-,,T.,-P1_ ,t`s'° vc.•. 34C0. 2 F({.Ti- of , it 143" - f- 4 -t j�:l. --3.40Ac._ -$- '`1 b T }.,. t °" ° its - e a s' „_gt 1'g 8 e .,1 .•-...ig a 9 - Ili _ _ L'fi.1>k '..° ['_=d- IOC 1aQ 30--- fOQ 264.45 1� 7-97"."......4.44113` g 8 s`�li 1 g 8 -9.t g 12, - 8 - - - _a- - - 6. `23' 100 S0 -16001 ..•..ter - VACL� i0-216-5•�3- me" �Ty^�AT (T AiTS �2D]. =- 100 100 _ -50 - 100 _ 100 S. -- -100 2 4:._ � _ 1Q0 - -w1e1--'� 1 �ii•.o-- /.•//'-«l..Z,.,'.-./'!14?.'r/u'i�:1", -. ff'' /...•:.'./%h:'-//,%:- t>.-.- ..rne• •.•. -.,.. ' ,bv ,i 3=43 Ctti�' i - 100 1! ....:«.,'. e..• -i _ -- -- - - 4:2Z 043. 4-22 Ct5 100 ��-Z'10 'Z50 !' - 1300• .. .C.... ..••'. 100 - .'' 4- - ! X22 H 22 E '42.2 C1t54 ff..... d - 23F '- f.- .'z - . la o 4-1 t I 3300 3401 32c�0 g0 � 3203 g.,e _ .r ` f i 45Ar. 43 AC T/4C r-- of .30 AC_ or' t:t. }�e� ( t--�s f' A rA M I 3202� 3205 j6AC. °e ' _ E? 'i'4.a�. till' 4 --�-- --� �36.4C.`1; - �• _ei l =) f 1 fir et 0 % -- v _ - - E9= -_ - ^ - 8. _ - es y °° I -a :I;o a oo�t - \q.Ri l� - _ Nz Fc I , $ I .7 n a �1 10 a.4� gG 1L-.....- SZB-CM ,y.1 j - 1 1 T I '" if 85 'T 3�+ ~z °N ♦y a Q - - - tOO- -. c „;�-- x - 7'•'S t - 75 - - is - 75 - 75 - - SOD - 0 - -- re, `. - - r I o! 3302 - 3303 3304 3403 a� I ( 2- „, I I �I .224C .22 AC _22 AC. 29 AG °bo _ - �_ - _- 1- I N• t - p9\6 - - _I. ro•;°•.,�.a: tDQ' 3600 1 I 33+i j ��1 ° `- - - - - cO .6`t S - p @4'°2.R.n• -��' .�7SE�.'*'�w,.-•...-}4 22 CF{ 02 5 69°3a'W e0- '��S� _ -F��� - - €.)_ --- eta2437 '' 4.22 CHS._ T4.50 +y6'- 75 - 1 Its 1 - - T.---- 100 100 - 7. ! ECR 823-4e•WIDTH 1 STREET l V ` r • 0.de..w.I.,.a .r , ., a_,.r ..n•t.�... .t. r,.,a r,r..4,,t... ,a«,..,v.1 rv•,.r...r....._a.l_.a.l..l.r..... ..,•. ..,.r««,.--..w....1. �xi,,.u�,.,.. ..r....,..-..,,.r.•..+1.w...4.:w'.frM.m ....-.b.l+++wrf�4.k.o.-.x..x.u.,..+.« LAO 1 OM, rrr. .Lh'0 eiLa ■ • I • i 4 , • j�. � • • . TTT • • • • • I STREET SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR PLANTINGS .IAMB► . . r ONCR till . - 'AV* \. A SPI .0 in 1 NY i 1 -- 6iG. '01. Ali AL Aih„ . . , . . 1 4 4 4, ,\ 411.1211111k. , { Y , 'gr. . . . ci -, f .-4,,, MIMI 1 Ell iiim ,,, .. Elm. 4 ■ L•INCO N +CENTRE V •t, I. ■ S DE ALK ;y i28`OOcrGR S Si. '•M �• 4. ` + ' r r •' ,/ ' tip. : ,, — ■ I q--; A;�• � „! , ' ' • �,j "v rte' 1 i• 1 1 /.I;.• `" r '• •I 1 1 A T / ARDFN ' III 1~''r \ ' t + . • ++ " ,,•�-/�` `\• t.�. 'ATE, i 1'. • 1 h4 ' li " vi,0 r.i____ (44.11% 6.„lAVI4:7414,,AVIA111*.,IR°DOWN i I . • Fly k hAl P'40;11 11 efiN 1474 0 M I I.' .*4 ' Illik\ii,111/4104,/, , ,. .1 - 4. . , / v ,,151116. t � 1 ] ' az b P L��,40 . , 4,/,\, . 1 . Is\ v 1+ 1 4 44 1 �^ / , , •L 1 • MOM ,, `i w . i i i e F e •.. A• ' I* . . ■ • • ..,'.• ,p.4la .., ., 1.r, .., ',;� j/r.'///f4%i%/l/,¢,ir'//////Ji/f/////////1%////////////////44.1V4//////1/./.9/4,�///� 44.%!l/I///:///, "/,.//////////.'///////////!/•///�/I/!//J/. //i%////!//.%///////////i%/////. :: „ ., �i'�I'///I//////%J//,!�'V////,,,-,////////P/% IN. CR 753 K 1. 753` 0 S0 0 a0, 50��_�-5G 27.956--1 5o 50 �0 50 50+ 77, gp ."50�.'. • 5f? 50 50 5 50 a ? ,' ; i• OQ 406.50 3 1 i 1 1002 1 I rao .32 AC. 0 ,C 9/AC. p I of ;23'AC '-'i 10 3 2 i ol� �� 4� 3' 2 I al I� 4 3 12 I °— c� 3 �I ^ I f I o : i. w y ' . T n1 z..w. M g«• ••• Ky w ` 106 !4L! gg i f I 5 � � 6Ac° te ,fly� Airs 00 A N N uLt ",SA" 0 --G O E: 'O 6 Ii I 6 h l r. I O I 6 ADO a 4 , M to 1 o a N z 7O2 ' ' ...1 `.23 AC. o! I 8 9� IU 2 I2 7 8 9 IQ��: I °!7 9 1C C"J o 7 8 50 ..i� 50, -4....50 „ 50 . 50 ,,,� . L,;O.. :50 550 L... 50 ,, 50 . 50 0 �- - 0 60 ls,d. �, '� loo oa .et It • VACATED /Q 7�3-P27 °Lee 4 r VACATED A/,0 7P3-232 l''' 100.04 �t �LJ j c0 M I 50 1 4" 50 -T", so -?" sia �Y` 50 r ."o I', sn� ��Q so .�' `�' �a _. o .. o Fo '^ 9s I ( .� 11a �1► 2t3 29 ' 1 .50 (. „id 89 31�21"E. 1` 2„ o F , 48 O . 5 BO 10 I ° 12 4 3 ! 2 I oI I— 3 l g1 ;1 .'4 3 a ' 1 ° 2` a , I N i r:�"� , i0O4 I I �J L...,--4#4.,. c:5�d Ac. 1 -4/q,°; ., 4. 4 '4, ,. � , + 4 N .,,.�- . .,.� ;-0 30,^ . , , 100^� la O r O O 1'211-.1 •G b , �1 ��a N 12 5 �14t.@@ u1 � l� ' 5 12 �1 1rn 5 12 �� ��;" *.j � 1 R=134.60 . a\4\ �� 1 �►:t* +� i 4 ,«•.ci ± "T + 41.1 a d� - ' 1 '• J .0 _ \ .u.. .� Q 3d 5 r"E 't$ t .I •.r« 1 2 ' 6 1 I1 gel I m��°� n I I a + "14'! E,r;.. .-'.6)5 `-' . a r.4 L .. °i 15 I o 7 10 al ... . I 7 IQ I I�� 1 � f0 O �1 0 7 21 (g 8 9 21 "ti.•1 12 8 '' 9 2I 8 9 2 �, .. (' 2P3�.95 • 50 2a 25 100 100 j �• -� �- �"' � c TE� •dQ�21653 --� 50 �_ -, sP='t� ,,... °� -�-'�a�06 ; •'' ., ,..�, . ,. __ ,_ �- 1+50 loo ,,.� 5 �� ao ��� !b� • "r'///� �i/a /%11ll�.���/ff',,,�����>!i �l/i/' .f���7�7/"��� • • j.,/. %/J✓'P7J�i/ ���%7�,/�1 /. �1 ,r//l //// ✓,,;-'/////Y/'ri!//4/ �•'' 100 100 LO Z50 100 100 I too 4. cHS. rsd N .° 22' 605) ; . 4°22 CHs. 4.22 CH$, , I n • n,, I E") t"'1 I' 1. } �� "934-i _ *__ i , I . U -,4 td 1 . 6 b` I I I �. 75 .�. 7(5 .�,6 , . I 1 I o1 ' 3302 - a303 o '_ 122,iIC, ,.0k46.-',.. �dC; N I N I a a .. I" I tan' , : : N e. [4. � �s0a ir. I 530 1., , � s �t°ti1 4V &�2 dc. � > A 2!._,..E �4 ,� ! '! e4-42497 • 76 �'S :,, „1,, 1: ..10A},r ,l 4,.., r f' °R .3 -4Q i rNlt1�? b ■ '. , ci) co M"a......J. .1..n-.r.wir,anM..,.,., .+.«...:a.......:.r...x..U:«.f....., '�ywnxaaa tee».+...,.«,...».x:,w.n....... ...-_..M:..-+..J.I.. .....i...st».'._..... ..•„ - - - '. - ..ur sl•J. +.r:,.Ynr. .w,1.aM• O • ����/�./��/����///il✓�///Ir/J 4f ZE , ///% v ii/lii/i/r:+rdiiJr.Lll,l//ir//iUliiiUr//L:///iil�U/i/ii/iiii/ii///ii//i//O/ii/riiUiili/l//ii/i/i//i.//r//I✓/i///Ili/// , 53; . '°,' (C•R.'.'753-5°' WIDTH) a o , ' :.5,a+ ;-6.•a r-7,,0 • 50 50.' ii 50' 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50• ,�t00 50� W 400 202 2031 ,1i.204 100 ildd o 3'AC. .18 A4 1 I ',:;D�: .6,9 AC. .22 AC. .24 AC_ ,,, .35 AC.� 0 574 AC. o • o� 2 ° 4-a a. • Z = 8 81 r.) I8 .2 a `� • Z 3',' °- i? 4 3 ° 24.)b- o; U p`-' 4' 3, 2 I 4' .-' .- 2 I w 2 0 c `�' 6 .'m 0 -&- ' 50 _r 100 50 o i 5 12 cfl 2 5 12 °� I n' 5 12 °., 3 , ( 100 0• (62.50) 37.50 I(31) .(19) 50 ' 0 6 11 , rn Li.: o II _ too a • -1- ' -q- -4 L - N ,�02. s600 ,� i :,,,.". U • ..1 .23 AC, :34AC. o I r... 0 8 0 ° 2 o,.0 2 7 8 — 9 10 2' ;••t 12 7 8 9 10 r— L i �? 7 8; 9 10 -� •.•� In WZ w SEE {I11�. r (350) 5Q � IS 13�J�a.i 5a. 0 ' , 50 6 3o..'. t 0 6 50'. \V . 50 50 1 50 5Q 1 5_0--!,—_ 0' _____1._______t,30' 50 • R /STREET O �, +N k (C.R. 1508 • . ' 2e. ,; • 5Q r-5-0---r-5-70-1-5-6----1--E70-1-5-0-1-7-50 50 0 , z ,x 0 0 9 a 2800 296,,E Q g I I ° 18 4 3 2 1 2 .- ' o ° Ii3, .A 2 I of •:.. io 4 3 2 I QI - I I.r 3 r � �aa A r eM1 A NY • •yn 01 ` ..seY`, 1 ,�,b-, Ye. too .4 • ,. 4- 10 1 �. 100 100 • too Ioo fe...r; IoQ , 3'&! - Q. d b 12 al (, 12 N I° s. 5 N a I I - of o• Lila 6 H 21 •'e • tit?, �, = ., a ♦4 •a• -4 • 7■ f e... .f �, f1 e1ms► , .____t___ ° G 9 21 1,9 8 9 ,� '.; , t. a pct i I o tld0I 50 __ 1 I ;,0 •_ 100 100 100 __r._,Ir,— -•e�-- J 1 .. r � 100 00 50 rrrirrirlr�r�ir ' %/i .�krl� 100 ' 10� it 22, an()' 4.22 cl-is. IT I Vr� 3203 • 3201 3;';00 3401 320G :/8 AG, .30 AC, ��g 'r: l rP,71 Ac 3205 00 f ,i� 1177 .11.L ►20 ',, d/6,�G. �► 6:,. o! i. U 'F! Q. cA CV i� 6 ` 0 � to M M 4 0'` �1 ,t65t. 04 1 w�`t o o in �'V �h, 56 C7 N' 300. 21 in � �G4_ ?5 100 '� 3302 3303 3304 3403 . ca �• Cr 4.$2 CIiS: Ito STREET ' � , � (,,R. 82,3-409 wit)Tt1 1 � -, ., 1 . p ' 1 • A } • 3. List an. variance, conditional use, sensitive lands, or other land use actions t, any a , to be considered as part of this application: A AdI)7.i�_ , t i y yar-i a aae to the he ght restrictions .I R 4. Applicants: To have a .complete application you will need to submit attachments ` ' described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. 5. THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed .upon the subject property. B. If the application is granted, the applicant will, exercise the rights Pp g 9 PP granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan., attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the II x applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this r ! application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are ` false,,' D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including t, the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application., DATED this day of 19 89 ` 4( SIGNATURES of each h.... atmer (e g. husband and wife) of the subject property. • I '' I ' ''mow,,."'"","... . r►, ! �� -4�, • y ! • s o- w • • ■ Cm ' OF TrnARD, OREGON! • • f ITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION , IG 13125 SW' PO .d 23397 < CITY 0� T ARD 131 S Hall, ox • Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171 FOR. STAFF USE ONLY . CASE NO a (C,... ,,--- 'r'" . . 1, ., e \�i OTHER CASE NO'S: V '/ i; . " 1 � RECEIPT N0. U 6 , t. APPLICATION SA EPTED BY b , . DATE: Z-7 ,1 . •f .4 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Appli ation elements submitted:, PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION Lincoln Center / ( )' Application'form (1) /&Z 6 , ,/ „1„.-„ 7,,_. (D) Owner's signature/written ' _.,,. TAX MAP'AND TAX LOT �NC}. 2 1'='=-1.f,:t-3=&9',:,.._. / authorization 1 0 (0 Title transfer' instrument (1) ' wi SITE SIZE Refer to Exhibit Dr ngs D) Assessor's ma.p (1) • PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER* Trammell Crow Comaant + (E) Plot plan (pre-app checklist)' ADDRESS 1026.0 Stj Greenbur Rd�HgNE JF)��. � � Applicant's statement CITY _ Po d, Oreion ZIP 97223 (pre-app checklist) APPLICANT* __Ingi° i 4 P_C_ (G) List ©f property owners and. ADDRESS One _ Cenerpointe D . PHONE 620-2025 addresses within 250 feet (1) CITY Lake Oswogo_, Ogo .re n ZIP 9703.5 (H) Filing fee ( /91,10D ) I.. When the owner and the applicant are different ; people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a leasee in possession with written authorization DATE DETERMINED TO n atithorz BE eOIIriP�.aETE: of the owner with written authorization. The owner(s) must sign t: the owner or an agent a itten a ( � g this application in the space provided on page two or FINAL DECISION DEADLINE:____ submit a written authorization with this application. `' COMP. PLAN/ZONE DESIGNATION'' y ..:..,....r.: .,.. . i �, 21pROpOSAL SUMMARY 1 subject property ,.., re nesters of record of the su �e The owners q site development nt review approval to N aP 4O Nt�.mber« ' allow the canst�i cation o a seven ,st,r,�. � 4' Approval Date building with � �z �,�����c�cdm��zn�in�� too. ���� � � �� � ; n �7 sto- atki -i ara e at Lincoln Final Approval. Date: be k n as Li c� 5. Planning., 0 1 0l Cent n Engiraw ing N �" fl 24P/l3P If Rev d 5/37 fr • • o CITY OF T IGARD MEMORANDUM • I , . I TO: Whom It. May Concern and File No. SDR 9-12/M 89-11/V 89-17 FROM: Deborah A. Stuart, Assistant Planner RE: Parking at Lincoln Center .DATE: August 16, 1989 • The City of T ig ar d has reviewed proposed plans for parking at the Lincoln Center Five complex. Once Lincoln Center Five and the new parking structure have been constructed, it is our determination that City requirements for the • overall number of parking spaces will be satisfied„ • I 1 • I rL/r I � • I i 1 1 '.k N.....,. ..+.. i'.N.M.• ....M_,....... .....u...,�......«-,„...,.., ,».:.t.,M,,.M.••..r..•,.. .. ,ur:.M —.-.t I.,RI.., w.I,'J1.:..,..ti.-«.....-..�-«..i,.,.iJG..i�,:�r«,:.:,1.,,xµ....,. r •arr«.F��.«.,x:«u...,o....W:.is,.:.'«,.wM.r�.ti..»,.,J::,.,.+-.,a-:w....h-:..,:....Mn;,..,txw•....w..+�...w.,..n -�w.,:s....�., ...«. ..,«�v, ., To Whom It May Concern: Pursuant to the intent of item 11 of SDR 89-12/V 89-17/M 89.110 The formation of a Local Improvement District as per the attached Exhibit A shall constitute compliance with the City of Tigard's Notice of Decision Site Development Review SDR 89-12/V 89•,17/M 89-11 item numbers 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, E 15, 16, 17 and 18. I , Approved and Accepted by: By: Date Title a City of Tigard (;) A r I PPP... j4 y' �1 ]}• ;I � 7ry,t° "kA ssTT vt' r t , • k,),k, '2, d rf.I.Alv , �I • n t� ..' 4,r„ ,,,I1..,.._.......,.... .....,.......,.. .,,....,.,,..».,..... ..................e.�r..„.....•,...._e._...,...,.... _n..,..1... .. _..,.. .. i, .. ., ._+........i....,......µ._....,-....._.._.....,,......a.. .. .a...-_.,..+.L,J..;.......,.,.,.........�._ ..us,..'.a.t...:,i,n:...1. ........,'.:. . ...-I M.n.... Ked4 eweeeis, /. ve.e.7 (4,4+4401- j7' 4: Ad fl r,40• ” ,4 4 7) .3, Akow:le, "efilee €91C tergefrxibiewle (?0,4440,4 #17,) M1 MORANDUM ' TO: Randy Wooley ("4,0"000. FROM: Keith Liden ' ' RE: Lincoln V conditions of approval �� F le No. SDR 89-12 I have attached the conditions of approval for the Lincoln V office building which is currently under construction. Conditions 1. through, 8., 8., 19., and 20. have been satisfied; conditions 6. through 18. have not been completed; and conditions 21. through 27. are related to the operation of the job site and 1 ree not to building permit issuance. Since the LID described in .condition 11. has g�re ceived Council approval to proceed, conditions 9. and 10. can be, waived once (- i4iMM" the LID is formed. Ajgr 016'5A My question relates to the applicability of the remaining unsatisfied � conditions that are to be Completed prior to issuance of full building permits. * ' p It app ears to me that a number of them would now be completed as part of the LID►, Could you review the remaining conditions and indicate which ones still need to be satisfied prior to issuance of building permits? Condition 7. pertains to Mapleleaf and refers to the previous decision (SDR 87 08 - relevant condition from this decision is attached). Since both SDR 87-08 and SDR 89-12 were Director's decisions and the condition calls for re- evaluating .the Mapleleaf signal, I would interpret any final design selution for the driveway and the signal as a minor modification to a Site Development Review approval as provided in Sections 18.120.070 and 080 of the Code. Please call me if you have any questions or need to discuss this with me. Thanks. c: Ed Murphy j i, '...____..:" e LAD a roved by l:1 44eitcd - r el .��,.�� ° � ��-rziei c11r�d e" it "i/� 0.e1 tel '/r 4445 � (7 01-140 tI� 6e ptf t)i i 5' ? r 7/ ' iG C-' ' ,,° 4444 4€1,1 IOi I?) 1 `i'. i5 t l eo! It • iI3C'l appreima -1(a. L b ti cotteleileaal 4 y *' ' st1tem ,,v-eoee aveemat4. likee,01 afifii°00' r Oh) /✓f e e/ . kl ,; aWA AM4) 'die/ , 4,4, 46 Ye-7e Iui.e err ° J'� }>d'* /4'2 6) 40444, 1 i s d ee s , pot/16' 4 s '`e e 1 i 9, 4 / 044 ' ,*01) iiterrl �.- i,: „�i.. ..,,• •......._....,.i...�a,.... , ,._,x.',.,,,« ..._u.,.... •-,..,;4,....1,......,.i�«,....._,..u.. a ,.i.,_,.,.c�._I_, „�.a,�...:.a,,... .ri,,..J..:r�4,w...4«.,.,..w:.......,.,:-i...,.wi-:,t...w.,. I: . ' ' ' ., Fir LE;T. 6'.)r 1'1 • • . r y,4 • 6'• : '. '' ;', 'I.' ''' ' '' .'''' ' ''''''''' ' • ' ,I. '. • I ;I,';',I,.',. ,::::::::::r .....• ' . •Fii,,,....r.1 ,.,' , .. , : -‘,...., . :. ,., 1: , .,,•,,,,,.,....... ..........,.. ,,,::.,.......: ,..4.-,.:1'.. }rat Vi, � � f �, , it •i ry • • .y- :''' . COMPAN ' , ., . . , . . • . , . , ., , . . . . . . , . . .. . , . ., . , . , , , , ,, , , , , . , , , . . . . . . , . . ., , . . , , „,,,,, . . . . .. , . „. , . . , , , • . , . . , ,, , . , • . , , , , . . . • , , . . .. , . .. , ," . , , 1 .• .• • . , . , .1 , . . .. , , . .., . . , , • , . . , , , , , . Jyw\ . . ., .. , ,. . . , , , , ,• . . . ,., , .. , „ , . . . , ., . . • , , ,, ., . • , ,, . • , .. ,, . , . , . . „ , . , . , ,, , , .. , . , , , . , , , , . . . . „ i 1 . „ , ,,.. . .. . , . . ,. . . . , , . . ., , , . . . , ., , . • .. ,,, ., . . . .,. . ... . I . . „ , . . . ,.. ,, .. . . , , , • , , , • • • • ,. „ „„, , . , , . . . , , , . .. ,.. , ,. . .. . . • . , . . , . , ,, ., . , , , . , . . . . . . . . . . . . , , . . . . . . • , . .. „ . .,, .. . , . .. b, . , . . . .., . . . . , , . , . . , , , ,, . ., . , . , ., . . . . . , . , . , ., ,. . .„ . .. , . ,. . , . . . . , ,... . . i: . . ,. . .. • • „ , . .. .. , . , ,. . ,, . . , ..., ,. . . . , . . , . , . . . ..,„-;,,,,',p . , . • • ,, , ' \' .. t`.' TRAMMEL CROW DEVELOPMENT a ' 'PREPARED I VOR' I TRAMMEL CROW COMPANY ' � ' • • PORTL ANB,' OR.hIGOJ ' wI dR � t .,' i 1' . . , ''' ' 1 ,15'iV ..°"-illi' " ''' " '' " '' , I , PREPARED • BY _ATE ORTA, . TONG r (1TE�� �SSOCT� 1� TSP I�IEERNG PLYt , '4 04 0 . DOUOLA,S WAY• . LAKE O SWE00 OR• , 97(.1 16 ' ';I • i • • f 1 • { I 1 i i �� �,, • ., ,,.....w .. .,.��••.�... .. f i 17 • a ' "+"rl w.w..L.+,�,4..... u.w♦ rt.ua,n.+ulwer>A_x'.r.a+w+w.mrlv'H-..i .. 1. ' TABLE 'OF CONTENTS ; °; INTRODUCTION ,. EXISTING CONDITIONS • •• r • • • • •• • • . • • e « • o' « • 1 t STUDY, AREA LOCATION . . . . . . . • • . ' . • • . • . . . 1 t . L , , TRAFFIC C , ONTROL 3 TRAFFIC VOLUMES . . • •• • 3 CURRENT LEVELS OF SERVICE , ,� • 3 PROPOSED D E V E LC)P l A E N T • . . 4 • • • • • • . • . • . ' . . • 11 ' 44 6", TRIP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 1 3 DISTRIBUTION „.. • . . • . 13 it FUTURE LEVELS OF SEVICE •SERVICE • 19 STACKING DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS • • • •: 2,0 ,,, SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS .. • • • . • • p r • • • • • 21 ; TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS • . . . • e •• • . . . . . ' 2''1 'T'RANS'IT CONSIDERA'T'IONS 23. [',: • x' CONCLUSIONS • • • . '• . • •' • • • e . w' . • • • • • • • . • • 24 • RECOMMENDATIONS • ' e . • • e • • r . • , . . •. • •i •e ' . •. • 2 5 I, „, . ., qj S I) Iii • I . i ':I° I 1 1 V . . rl • . .,al:..+m...t.:.Lr.4l... � •_. : .xis, u,nh.a..x..4....�.r..N!.«.u.��..�..�, ...a:.:.F'tl—+VtH-?..tW.u.�..k.t.1x'H.-irL,uL,....u,wJw t.v i... u�.,_..•a... .... . .. .a'n4.t.-•.,.._ 1.-a....wf •�.1,,..r,n.,....« tJ1...'w+.......a.r«..:...... .. � i .CVUUV'.x ...ytl.+. .. }IGURES 1 '�a 1. VICINITY MAP. . . . '. . . . . . . . 2 . �' ' 2. EXISTING AM' TRAFFIC 'VOLUMES 5 TRAFFIC VOLUMES 3. EXISTING PM TRAFFI 'rl . . . . . . . . . • , m . . . . . . 6' 4.. SITE GENERATED' DRIVEWAY TRAFFIC AM PEAK HOUR, 15 I 5. SITE ,GENERATED DRIVEWAY TRAFFIC PM PEAK.HOUR. . 16 . . 6. TOTAL TRAFFIC AM PEAR HOUR r,. . . e 17 ' . ` IM 7. TOTAL TRAFFIC PM PEAK HOUR 18 , • • rr i 1.,.,,; I. { Ay, ray" � 1 I „ �, k�..j v I 1' Y!' +f • . I I 4 I V •I 1 i i I 1 I' I t • I' I 1 I I f I 1, 4. l e . .4.1,, 1._.., _. _r.�.. ��..o...,«.,�.�«�a...r..l,...,..r.,.•..w..r.:....:la.,_....'.«..ww..,�..x,�....-..+.. ,.1.n'.. -.,. _. . l';; p`j ti TABLES . LEVEL ,u 1 'OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS.. (SIGNALIZED INTERSEGTIOI�' S) . . . .'7 I • ' 2 ODOT CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 �, 3. LEI/EL OF SERVICE. DEFINITIONS (IJNSIGNAL�IZED INT��^RS.ECTIONS) . .9 4. CRITERIA FOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS. . . . . . .'.. .'. . . . . . 0 . . ..10 ' ' 5. EXISTING LEVELS OF SERVICE AT CRITICAL INTERSECTIONS. . . . . .11 6. PROTECTED TRIP' GENERATION FOR TOTAL DEVELOPMENT. . . . . t:'' '7.,' LEVELS OF SERVICE ,AT CRITICAL INTERSECTIONS TOTAL TRAFFIC.19 . . 1,i', 8. STACKING DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS .. 21 ' S TRAFFIC 22 • a 110.TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS' 23 jt F I r. • I �, . r . IL .„ . . . . , . ; l''' I rf , I I --III..-: ' 1 I I I I 1 A ,cd • 1 .•.'.., v-.; .... „ tri,u.n. r. ......vr ...._rr. ,.. ,.! ..ar•.w. .•.... .t...., r...,. ..•...v.0 ` ::a "�r _�„w�w„.., .,.,.»..«.k...,......�k,.,_.,,. ._._., ...�_�,•..w«�,c.t::...:..M,»»...,•� ,x:,..aax....�,u�..n�:,.,.,.......v«.,.._��,,..-i......=;�.ca'.w�m'�..w.,,..,,. _, _ ",.�_.J_... ,.w «N,.��,w» - ._,::,.w. 4 APPENDICES APPENDIX A CURRENT •LEVELS OF SERVICE CALCULATIONS , .• APPENDI B - TRIP GENERATION CALCULA2IONS . • " PPENDIX G FUT3RE EVLS OF SERVICE CALCULATIONS • • ,APPENDIX ;D - PASSER 11-84 ANALYSIS ' • ® I I n I . }I. ,, , ,. , ' ' ' . i I f IV 'j�j 4 • i 1 • . 1 i I n i,1 .,-ti4.ast w=.r.::•..r.M+.....-.o.», a...«N..ill '_,-n....i_.-...a....•Wr.n.:....-.•1,i..:« - ...4..»: i.v;sn.n.-..+ .NJ...;.•,»n_.r.d.,...1 i.ew.»...YWU.ruL..—L.•:..k>.......r.'.:9.4.ir ..l.r. .. .s•u#a.w+..—s.idJ{-+,4 a i ,• • TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS OF TRAMMEL CROW DEVELOPMENT AT LINCOLN CENTER AND GREENB'URG ROAD s 1;; I LOCATED IN TIGARD, OREGON INTRODUCTION This report represents the findings of a transportation analysis for the construction of an additional /25,000 square feet of general office space at the existing Lincoln Center development located on Greenburg Road in Tigard, Oregon. The purpose of this transportation analysis is to assess the transportation impacts of the proposed development on the surrounding road. system The appendix for this report contains a summary of all key technical calculations and field data. EXISTING CONDITIONS •1 STUDY . 1•..14 LOCATION The study area cons ists o f the area bounded by Locust Street on the north, Hall. Blvd on the east, Hwy 217 on the south and Greenburg Road on the west. �. . The area mi �om�xnerca:al and high density � a is residential retail. Current c mix of fs to resa. ac e� and the site is from both Greenburg,Road and \\ �, I Locus t Ave ne development b .. W .. +ersections The study area for this d �:ncludes� those �.nt adjacent specific intersections listed I j the development cent` to © nt' and the above, See Figure 1 I '1 r I ASSOCIATED: TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING (ATEP) PAG E 1 f .I: • ' •r..'.,_,,..,...,,....,...... �,. �. .,... „. � ,.,.�.�. ..._.. � r.Syr u 1 r Lam+ r C6 1 [ , HALL BLVD 1 I 1 . 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 � 1 1 I 1 , $,, 93rd 3rd I r 1 . 1 �. 95th 1 N , 1 � 1 1 H A i`� ) , BFI'[ 1 'Q' 1') 1, j�� I � , 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 4� 1 1 1 • WASI•HINCTON WASHINGTON I SQUARE WASHINGTON SQUARE 1 . SQUARE TOO • • 1 1 1 I 1. I • PHASE NTE '` MAP FIGURE V� I NeT P`a 2 i iI 1 a /laidces ..,rid ,, L' TRAFFIC CONTROL Traffic currently located raf en a ed a f�.c s�.gnals are curt y at Greenburg Road and ,. �4 k?, Mapleleaf,' Greenburg Road and Hwy 217 on and, off ramps. All other Y intersections are controlled by stop signs. d ' TRAFFIC VOLUMES n The t . �., traffic volumes used in this analysis �were����SU supplied by the Oregon Department of Transportation,the Phase IV Lincoln Center ,r Traffic Analysis dated 1987, where data did not exist, ATEP 1'k conducted manual turning movement counts. All traffic projections j. were based on ODOT's year 2005 projections. Traffic counts taken „� during�� preparation of this report can be found in the Technical appendix, See Figures 2 & 3. CURRENT LEVELS OF SERVICE Level of Service (LOS) is a concept that was developed to measure '' how the driver perceives the conditions,, surrounding them as they n5 travel through an intersection or roadway segment. This degree of perception includes such elements as travel time, number of stops, I ', total amount of stopped de ,� pp delay, and impedances caused` by other vehicles. As originally defined by the 1965 Highway Capacity 4i Manual six grades are used to denote the various LOS; these grades I.' are shown in Table 1. Using this definition, it is generally s, agreed that "D" LOS is the minimum acceptable for an urban area. For the purposes of this analysis, the assumed relationship between � r `�' ol the calculated stopped time delay per vehicle and the associated ,. LOS intersections is given n T .. 2'd for signalized in t � g` en ire 'Table tJn .gn' a... liZed intersections�ons re x re a som enha t diflik ferent approach to determine the capacity of the intersection. The 1985 Highway Capacity manual offers', the concept of _ . "Reserve Capacity" t y a s the gUideline .measuring the capacity. Reserve Capacity is 5. defin.ed as dthat d portion a f available hourly 1 capacity that is not used". Should be that the concept t ' �, Reserve Capacity only appl i es to the ind ivzlual �tnove�lents of t,' traf f is on an approach to an intersection; either in an ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING (ATEP) i'A GE �I. A,, .:sel�r1" I > b : ,. ....«.»....,..:,x.,..+,.,-, ....,..•, .. . .._•.,..�. ..., m.,,w.._....._«.,i.., _,..,,.w_.....__.•._ .......,.,..,........,.....uµ'.,.k...w..»...,,....u..,.....,u.,.....a..-.':itiM.q,...»k..J.w ...,,..i<....w.,,.., ,.,... .vHi individual lane or a shared lane, not to the overall operation of the intersection. This determination is made after all approaches i are analyzed and the LOS determined is usually that approach that '`4' typifies the "Worst Case" condition or worst Level of Service. A description of the levels of service relating to the Reserve ILCapacity Concept is shown in Tables 3 & 4. • LOS analyses presented in this report were performed in accordance with the procedures described above. For each intersection, these analyses estimate the overallintersection LOS during the peak hour ,,,° flow. {+a :A+ 4� , ASSOCIATED TRA.N8PO1TA. i A A ' V ` • , '",.,... ....,,,..,.„..\\,,\ 280 205 �� 3 j cap l -, : 1 HALL 0)1 ` • Y r I• , i „ N M 1 , , • 1 • , •4' isr) /"---1,* 9 3 rd ,' 320 425 .' 11 95th , -L`I �„ fi D LL ii, v 50 }-� : 335 295 GREENBURG ' RB . • 14 24 lr� c 305 • �, '` 440 • r.• :35 70' 10 ��-0 15 185 • e.► 4 X55 M : M 1 : PHASE UNCOLN CENT FIGURE 2 EXISTING TRAFFIC FI * AM PEAK HOL,IP page 5 i ,. .:, , , (i IF 1 ,1,,,'it It)i ii" L...;*,oe p ':4 I i I + ■ I ■ -w,a«.,...�.... •..,c) • ii , .ft. 42i t30 1 1 x41 486 35 � rtloci � �� .1 ,-.. . I 25 !, .. HALL BLVD -- � 1 . . . . , 1 � � � � � � � � �� � � � �� � � � ���� �� � � �� � � Ira, • . . 1 1,,, Jo, 0 . . I i.,,,, NL„ 3 rc� 1 152 492 � 4h95 1 Li J (.1 T 529 471 .2z) 15 10 I 1GREEN3URG • • u x 2� 91 i n 4) , , , 1 643 49c) __J, t,....1.'fig. 1 11$ �., 502 71 878 t.,.., 4:7) 1 41 °'I r fl, i i r !' t 5 'y of - HUage k ^ .. .w...4,-....i.. . _ , ,_....L.......,,,.+ ...,...«,......licruw-.....,._,_ .-,. ,r w..,.,».Y.A.aI_....1 v..»........a+...:.��.«.-.IJW I,._ al.,a-. .„i _. ..a.A.a.f.. 4..Jrr. ..., .._ _ .,.1....,✓-,,.., r...r..i....,.s,.,-.. .,.i ..ul ' Table 1 LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITION w • (SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS) C' Level of Service Traffic Flow Characteristics A Average overall travel speeds of 30 mph or more. • Free-flowing with no congestion. No signal cycle failures. B Average overall travel speeds of 25-30 mph. Very few signal cycle failur es and little or no } congestion. C Average overall travel speeds of 20-25 mph. Occasional signal cycle failures and associated congestion. D Average 'overall travel speeds of 15-20 mph. Frequent signal cycle failures and associated congestion. E Average overall t ravel spe e ds of ab o ut 15 mp h. Unstable flow which includes almost continuous signal cycle failures and backups on approaches to the intersections. This represents the theoretical capacity of the facility. F below�g5mh with average overall travel signal Cycle speeds of flow, p Continuous g y le failure with backup on ap iproaches going through upstream intersections in some cases. n I Note: A signal cycle failure is considered car when N to occur .. .. .► one or more vehicles are forced to wait t mo re than one green signal indication for a particular approach. Source: Transportation ation Research Board. "Highway capacity. Manual",. Special Report 209 (1985) ii, L;".._ n A8SQCI AT D TRANSPORTATION o2IATIO N FN�1N��R7 �� & PLANNING (rTEP) PAGE 7 II n '.r ^.1w4t 0 'l y e Table 2 CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS s Saturation LOS value (per ODOT) .00 - .52 B I .53 .64 O � K .65 - 073 Ty .74 - .85 E .90 - 1.00 >1.00 ;,, • Source: Systems Studies y dares Una.t, Planning Section, Oregon Department of Transportation "Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Program User's Guide", January 21, 1987 I I I , i I q j I r' I I � :I I ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & P �I�G A�Ep� PAG E E F3 � r ` E) ' Table 3 LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS (UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS) ■ Level of o `" Service Traffic Flow Characteristics r , A Average delay per vehicle between 0 and 10 seconds Free-flowing with no congestion. Very few vehicles waiting in a queue. B Average delay per vehicle between 10 and 20 III seconds. Slight TO to vehicles little or no + vehicles in queue. Average delay per vehicle 20 to 30 seconds. Occasional delay and congestions, more than one , IC vehicle in queue. D Average delay per vehicle 30 to 40 seconds. Frequent delay and congestion,more than one vehicle per queue r I E Average delay per vehicle in excess of 40 to 60 seconds. This condition exists when the demand is near or equal to the capacity of the intersection or. movement. Unstable flow which includes almost continuous vehicles in the queue. IL • Forced flow, with average de la y p er vehicle in � . excess of 60 seconds* Queue is extensive Source: Transportation Research Board. "Highway Capacity Manual", Special Report 209 1985 • i it rte, } ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERXNG & PLANNING (AT'EP) FADE 9 V 0 ' ' «,,..�,..,Aa.,........�«,�....,a....._. �. .,, � .. _.... .....,r.4.,yr....Ai:..:.......,,.a._.�_....a..4•Aa...,_..:...t..,..won,Nwx.........»......n.rvll.f.:...wr.u..n.w.•a. a..a.,1.w+..:..»......+..A,,.i.ay.... ...�a.. ....,.e...,. _,. _ � ,_„ ..r -..ru,..A ....I llu....«.um.s,,..... �n ,.�,.aw... , +n4A, ma TABLE 4 e, CRITERIA FOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS : cR� Reserve Expected delay to • Capacity LOS minor street traffic, 1 • >400 A Little or no delay 300-399 B Short traffic delay.: 200- 299 C Average traffic delays ,, ,. . 100-199 D Long traffic delays l ays 0- 99 E Very lon g delays * , * When demand volume on any approach or movement exceeds the capacity of the lane, extreme delays will be encountered with • queuing vementsh in the intersection. congestion affection other traffic ' . This condition usually warrants improvement to the intersection. Source: Transportation Research Board. "Highway Capacity Manual", Special Report 209 (1985). • I I I I I a i I • '' • A.. SSOCIA.T�, E 9 TRANSPORTATION PO RTATION ENGIN.E ERING & PLANNING (A1 EP) PAGE. . 10 ' I ; .' • • I I j TABLE 5 • " EXISTING LEVELS OF SERVICE AT CRITICAL INTERSECTIONS Intersection LOS Saturation Reserve „'., AM PM Value Capacity Greenburg Rd & B E 78• Locust Ave . I Greenburg Rd & C F 106% r G'; South ramp 217 i[• I r I I I Greenburg Rd & 910 B E I II I North ramp 217. Greenburg Rd & B E 89% n Mapleleaf Hall Blvd & C 252 � Oak St. ** indicates left turn from Locust to Greenburg is at LOS E all " I I other movements operate at level of service C or better. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT For the purposes of t his report, the development consists of 125,000 square feet of General Office. While it is appropriate to I use the overall trip generation rates for the entire i.�znccln Center I I developme nt which would produce a lower overall trip generation on rate, this analysis will be addition of j 125,000 ` e' based on the juSt I' r analysis square fe et of general office thereby Creating a "Worst Case Scenario_ I r , The development phaSe and p as proposed and" Will velo merit a ro o�ed is to be built in one base Commence in the spring of 1989. .. ." The development proposes to have three hrI ee (..3) driveways locate d on Locust Ave and one (1) driVeway fro m th e real igned 93rd St xs et { I I I - I ASSOCIATED 'RA,N S P P ORTAT IOt ENGINEERING & I I,RLA NNING (ATEP) PAGE 11 II r I I TRIP GENERATION • . he EsttimatiF ng the number of vehicle trip ends that will be generated b ro o�sed development is of prime importance to Washington y p County,ODOT and the City of Tigard. Two basic procedures are `available to traffic engineers for s estimating the number of driveway vehicle trips generated by a Iproposed but not -yet -existing development: 1e Apply averages observed through field studies conducted at other similar facilities located throughout the United States. A number of ' sources are available for this information including Trip Generation_Manual ,,,,Oth Edition , which is published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) ; and summary trip generation reports prepared by the California Department of Transportation, the Arizona Department of Transportation, and other public transportation agencies. All of these sources provide excellent guidance in estimating the trip generation rates for various land uses, but obviously do not take into account the effects of local conditions and unique characteristics of the proposed land use. 2. Observe through field studies the actual trip generation characteristics of other similar and existing developments within the local area.', above etas used in the develop ment of this report. Procedure one b p Thef ' es expected figures d numbeY' 'g shown in Table 6 below,represent the p ;, . .to be g by the proposed development � ,� �� `of vehicle trip° ends t� generated on a daily am and pm peak hour basis based on the mathematical regression equations found on page 1150 Section 820 of the Trip Generation Manual (4th Edition) . IL P { I i ASSOCIATED TRAN8pQRTArzau ENGIrEErINN & PrARNIxG (AT EP) PAGE 12 Table 6 • P�',O3E�CTE�? TRIP GENERATION� FOR� TOTAL DEVELOPMENT '1 � t a Generated Trips (B) P Ni Peak Hour Size of Land Use Daily , � Total In Out Land. Use GSF A Volumes 'T Office 125,000 1,622 237 38 199 , NOTES?, A GSF - gross square feet B. Includes both inbound and outbound trips For the purposes of this analysis, it is assumed that none of the office-related person trips will be made by mass transit. This assumption ignores the Metro's most recent projection that p nt of all home based person trips purposes 4-6 percent �-ed erson i for � unrelated , to work will be made by transit. Therefore, this assumption tends to cause the analysis to reflect a worst-case condition, and " . overestimate the traffic ffic imp actw=- :.:.;,sociated with this development This zone change would actually reduce the number of trips that generated by this deve a does not • °• , can be gsn�r� by development. � I f��the zone� Chang • * take places the development could still develop with the building of a 12 5,0.. square U 0d s are fo�at Office building and the���existing �area with� �� � r a density of 4.5 units per aCrel could remain generating• an � � additional 60 trips per day. TRIP DISTRIBUTION � .. The distribution of generated trips onto the roadway system within distribution 5 �'thin the assumptions outlined in . ., the site area waS based on th Gree nburg Locust �a�� Commercial Distract Traffic fic Analysis dated r July 1981 and the Metzger-Progress Circulation Study udy a 84-l9S5 e .. u :ion was used to develop the. Site generated This trip distribution � develop� 'i traffic: for the specific drives ay and 'Street distributions a� � shown tra � Spy d�i s ",,`. �.`•� AS� J. IAjTRANSPORTATION n ENGINEE RING & PlANNI NO ATE p) PAGE 13 1 I r i n ♦ ....,u,..ten, .....-. ....,x • II.. ., i .1 a .• ...r. ,... . i p 'i s. 1«1 x on Figures 4 through 7. These figures are based on the shortest path routes between the ::., site and the sub-areas identified previously. . . o. i J I . 0A • i • r I , d • • I I I I I I I I • • , ASSOCIA .. . ;ANSPOR NO 14 `; TED 2'a��'ZClY1 ENGINEERING PLANNING (ATE P) i P A ... .... .:,..,:,.a.r�:.., ,�....,',...,..�.''.,. i .,. •.e.. .., o ..,..,,. ,.,�.i•. •.n..... ,,,. ... .,,..,., ...�.... .....«...,,.�.,,,, •....... ... ... ... ..... ... .... .,.i..,1, .r , ,. a,n,,.,. '..;.0.1?"V V iat / • .-..-� - ,, �. _ ..A ..✓n»4.r«x»..+.Hr.,.l....-,..r.....,.A: '4A.-... .+J.I---•,.ate..... .., .....no..i...sl.....1.,a4.,«....r.w._LV...,.-.,..,i, ..,. .. _. ..r..1. r , ., , . , . , , , 1.,, k 1 , ., • , , , ... „,,,, 1 c.,„. r-- . Lr 1,1-.,:i r 3 5'j ,, ,. , ;,, ti HALE BLVD tr, ,..,..) 1 .., . ,A4 • A 1 , JO f .. 93rd 2 rl� , r.. I J i r n 1 , ' 1.I� t.......22 B G RD 1 ,G 1 I f,. ir ,,,---1 ol, 1.1-.) , _ +....,.... tip \\N„...................._____ ; .,�. I ryry ff I G , 1 \\d\1 5 'r t . I I I I I 1 FIGURE 4 SITE GENERATED • 1 • I ,i If r twj7Y y } , ., , , ! , ! , , ! ., ' .21 ,r, .1 ',, ., - . , . : . ,. , : 1 I HALL L11 ---i 3r _--•. ! ! . ! !l. '1 ,,! • r . l.. r r1 I —r- '4 ■,-;- ■ G1 �EEN U G� RD . V"---, . ., . r . .t.t.,. .. . . , ., . . . .,t,.J... . ..,t,.,„ ... . ... ....., . _1. , � '.,.,... . . , ,4 . ,. i,,, ( .4,1' c'''' 'Iii, • . . ... l :\'\\‘\:''' ' . , .. 1131 5 I I,' FIGURE 5 SITE E RAT C TRA 'I PM PEAK HOUR 'PAGEI6 ir, I n o • • • 280 205 Q , . 4'-1 (1:)/ oar." • , �S I. . . -_' HALL BLVD 1 oU 14') "7 1"1,,,, 44 328 � . .;��:_,,,.� 93rd �--- • .• `"--.. , --.1, 482 ...,...,,,,.: L Li 1:::::::4. 1 . , , . E . i--- cf, , , , D 1.1....) C . ‘, "t 1 ., Nj ot r,...i---1 9 ,, v) 1 jj r 357 295 a., 5 1 i.;;1 al ,....)[.. 1 GREENBURG RD 1 1 148 rte 245 308 1 --' • I --4 1 482 . ' 1 /,/ 381 175 41° r 10 :542 I 28 9 ILol Lot 1,4-.) ,,,',..i, , ' Y' fIGURE 6 TOTAL P HOUR page 17 , • 1 »,..a.�„.,b,d+iµ....... __....Kx+,�K.:t'L..tau::J tav+w,4;:a1..+:w.;l.,1i:w, L.., ■ it I _ 1 i 1 I I I 4( , II • I • . 1 . , , tb•C, f li U^ \fY f.,.t 1 ��JJ, r, ,,,noe,,) ,,,„ .1 %•111-''''ll'. 1)1.,(i , L /,'k ' it,,t i'1” ' 1 e,00 1 ,, \.,r,,,,, 1 ,yr L 1 I , � „), ,i() ' ' ktA''') . II „ 6,s oi.,1,,,,.;)” 0,1,,,,, p,,,,iiic,, ' , , ' , I I II L.e�1� • , t I i t1., d i I I VV i ■ rry, • . @ • (°4J Nir. tell,. ) ..: 4411 486 1l 36 0 .a:1 21 y HALL , BLVD �''�► 11 t, G7 If) 64 v � /38 93rd SOS W ^ L.L..) R , rL-6-dj r--1 2,Lp o . L r-49....f —.'L'—''''N\k.4......7 ----/ , • ,,, 532 4 i 5 15 10 sD O , 81 1 r GREENBURG RD I ......./ 1 848 . 7 - . ' u�j cNf1 ., 50 4 3_5_, 4 r'' ' t__96 ''.,ei ' 694 , -ic,1 14/.. 28 502 wM 1 -- I 4 2002 41 c't '-"r'' 1 i 883 FIGURE 7. T TA • • .a t ' n • FUTURE LEVELS OF SERVICE In order to determine the impact of any development on the surrounding street system, the total traffic generated by the development must be distributed onto the street system and then e analyzed for any deficiency at the most critical intersections. ry The levels of service for those critical intersections are shown in Table 7'. TABLE 7 LEVELS OF I SERVICE AT CRITICAL INTERSECTIONS �; TOTAL TRAFFIC Intersection LOS Saturation Reserve � AN PM Value Capacity Greenburg Rd & B F -9 LLocust Ave. L Greenburg Rd C F 109 , S I '� 2 17 I ' South ramp Greenburg R d & C E 94% ' North ramp 217 Greenburg Rd & B E 941 • Mapleleaf all Blvd & A C 223 Oak St. ** � � G ee burg iS at LOS F all � indicates left turn �froYn � oc�ust� to r n g'' III Locust, � other movements operate at level of G or fetter. A c I indicate p ,nt �yompar�.s�n of Table 5 and Table cats that the de�re�.a me will have approximately a. 3% impact on any of the surrounding* street systeii . • ASSOCIATEb TRANSPORTATION' ENG1NEERI G & PLANNING (AT E..P. ) PAGE 9 i •i 7 • , Y/y �, • • ire, • • fra . V. This assumption �.� largely due to the existing conditions at the Hwy 217 off ramps These ramps operate at level of °t service E"axed "F" during the pm peak hour and the addition of approximately 257 , vehicles during g this period does not lower . , • ' .�w p w r the operating capacity • of either intersection. It was assumed for the purposes of this report, that the traffic signals along this section of Greenburg Road are not interconnected and, these intersections operate as isolated intersections. " ATEP used the Passer 11-84 (Progressive v Analysis an d �� nal System Evaluation Routine) traffic signal analysis program produced by the . • Texas Transportation Institute to review the existing traffic :' signals along Greenburg Road. The existing traffic signals are currently running between a 82 second and a 90 second signal timing during the pm peak hour. As 1' can be seen from Table 7, several of these intersection operate :? " low service the pm with. a to of serve during p peak hour. � The Passer 11--84 runs conducted by AT.'hP indicated that a 110 second cycle tended to provide the best timing plan for the system. The Passer program tends to discount the green time for side street ; traffic and gives the majority of green time to the arterial g r ion. This moves traffic along the arterial but add � y progression.ess ' adds more • • delay to the side streets. is type of analy analysis indicates that . all three traffic sig nals could be interconnected an d coordinated to 7provide progression s s on alo n g Greenburg Roa d during the pm peak I See, Appendix D for analysis of int. nnected traffic signals'L ppe ergo g' �a1s and 1, time space diagrams f I AN E REQUIREMENTS In conducting the capacity calculations, the stackin g distances I' ,.• required for :the critical intersections, Were . ... ... c Of statistical probability of arrivals on red and fare summarized p y in Table 8: As 1 F�:T�CQN � ATED TRANsPORT' NGINEE RzNG ft PLANNING (ATEP) PAGE 20 C kw TABLE 8 s . STACKING DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS Total Traffic 9 . PM Peak hour stacking zn distances re zred b y intersection crio n ° Movement Stacking Distance 4' Intersection �' Greenburg Rd & Mapleleaf NB LT 495' Greenburg Rd & Mapleleaf WB LT 428 ' Greenburg Rd & NRamp 217 SB through 489 ' • Greenburg Rd & SRamp 217 NB through 566' Greenburg Rd & SRamp 217 SB LT 234 ° SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS The overall traffic pattern for the Lincoln Center development r • consists of wide swings in traffic volumes between the am and, the �t pm peak traffic counts Traffic during the am peak enters the site from Oak, Mapleleaf and • Locust Ave and is pretty evenly divided among the three entrance ' points. During the pm peak the majority of the traffic exiting the site uses Mapleleaf drive due to the signal located, at Greenburg . • Road. A - This Concentration of traffic at the Mapleleaf', intersection is directly on Greenburg Road redly oue to the large volumes of vehicles r R and vehicles wanting to make a left turn from Lincoln Center onto Greenburg Rd. Gap studies taken during the preparation of the phase IV traffic report indicates that adequate gaps do vehicles exiting • o exist for ve le Locust Ave. onto Greenburg Road. This indicates that while the left turns from Locust Ave. operate at a level of s e "E oC e erv�.c' "E" with a reserve capacity" of -9 during the e p m peak hour, t hose left turns s have adequate time to make the left turn safely. '_. ... • TRAPFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS . , • A. s part of this analysis/r the ansa na1i zed a��er�ec tion lo cat e: d, at Greenburg Rd and Locust Street was investigated for traffic signal ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLAfiNING, (AT EF) PAG E 21 • 44*- ' a i f•. warrants. The two previous traffic reports conducted in the area in 1987 both reviewed this intersection and found that it did not meet traffic . signal warrants at that time. This analysis was conducted eighth � onducted bra using the assumption that the ��ei highest hour of the traffic day is equal to 70 percent of the pm peak hour traffic volumes. This assumption is based on traffic N " counts taken by ODQT where the eighth highest hour was determined wW to be an average of 69% of .measured pm peak hour. Three of the twelve approved traffic signal warralts were used to if any of the intersections determine Y e met the Manual on Uniform • Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) warrants for the installation of a traffic signal. Those warrants are: 1. Minimum Vehicular Volume 2. Interruption n to Continuous Traffic Flow 3. Peak Hour Volumes lops The MUTCD lists the following minimum ,requirements 'or meeting the above signal warrantsa . TABLE 9 �o Interruption of Intersection Minimum Vehicular Continuous Traffic Peak HOur Volume Flow Volume d Major Side Major Side peak Street Street Street. Street Hour 1 Locust Ave Greenburg Rd 600 150 900 75 250 1 ._ . ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING PLANNING (ASE?) PAGE 22 4 i a `„ • M1 1' I •> I I • F 1_.. o TABLE 10 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS Interruption of Intersection Existing Vehicular Continuous Traffic Peak Hour Volume Flow Volume Major Side Major Side Peak LStreet Street Street Street Hour Locus t Ave Greenburg Rd 789 156 789 156 224 I s Tables 9 & 10, it is concluded i . �� Bayed on the comparisons between Ta , that the existing intersection will meet one of the required signal ti warrants by the end of construction in year 1989. This analysis '. only indicates that the intersection meets minimum volume levels for one hour of ,.. Je day and thereby increases the probability that a signal will be required in the future. A complete traffic signal warrant analysis will be required to determine if a traffic signal is justified at this locations r I I TRANSIT CONSIDERATIONS I I 1 -met 1' stop p This Site is served by Tra: met at a bus c located., on' the east �. side of Greenburg Road north of Mapleleaf. Y it 1,w 1 I ` ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION SPORTATION ENGINEERING " & PLANNING (ATE?) PAGE' 23 .. I � I I FACTS LAND FINDINGS Based on field review and the above analysis the following conclusions can 'be made: ICONCLUSIONS 1. The site will generate approximately 1, 622 new vehicle trips per day` when complete. on Greenburg area of ,�i � 2 o The intersections along enburg Read in the b the Hwy 217 interchange experience congestion and I , considerable delay during the existing pm peak hour. 3. The site distribution indicates that this development ' will increase the saturation levels on Greenburg Road approximately three (3) percent. This small percentage will not adversely affect the surrounding street system. • 4. The intersection of Greenburg load and Locust Ave. meets one of the Warrants required for the installation of a R' traffic signal and should be investigated in the future g g by additional warrant studies. ti � 5. The existing ramp signals on Greenburg' Road and Hwy 217 are currently, interconnected and operate on 'a 82 second cycle during the pm peak hour. 6. Passer 11-84 runs indicate t.: lat by connecting the I Mapleleaf intersection to the Hwy 217 signals, Greenburg I, Road could reduce the delay created at the ,offs-ramp 7. ODOT is currently reviewing several lane use chan g.,. es on Greenburg Road at Hwy 217 which should hel p eliminate • 1 some of t he congestion created at the Hwy 2 17 off-ramps, � . .0 j I ASSOCIAT ED ED ,.TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING ING & PLANNING (ATEP) PAGE 24 f, , 1 RECOMMENDATIONS i I � n Based on the results of the traffic access analysis described in this report, it is concluded that the property as proposed can be constructed with minimal impact to th e surrounding our�dxng street system. , To ensure the safe and efficient movement of traffic and pedestrians within the area, the following traffic operational improvements are recommended. 1) , The existing signal at the Greenburg Road and Mapleleaf intersection remain a four (4) phase operation. I I I I I 2 ) The proposed set 33rd I.t .D. construction will provide additional access to the site from the south and should include the realignment of 93rd St., at Locust to odat the proposed parking areas accommodate g • � 3) The existing n g signal at Greenburg Road and Mapleleaf be reviewed for interconnection with Hwy 217 traffic • signals. J 4) The intersection of Locust and Greenburg Road be restriped to provide a left and right t urn lane for La cust Street traffic. I . I )))j AS8OCIATED fRAN S1 O .ATI4 H rNGIN^E�TNPLANNING :,.a aP PAGE 25 k I I I I I I I II I I I I �I I I I I I it I i .w r.', n ...,. .•t.,t F',.: .. i ' � r ..r: �. L ` ...7, r .Yf' '.'`:m. ,f .. •� n ., I ?s • . .':''' • .., . . •. ...,, . , . ...''`::`:•:•:'''';7'• • , . ' , . f' . . ' :.: iANSPORTATION, . . :,: , :1 •.' S F'.; ^^ . . . ,,.: ,, ,, . . , ,. . • ' r....% /✓ f� Marta I ,... . , . . :.,. , . . . , .. ., . , .._,..,._..„•"..:„, ,,..„,,,,,,..,.:.::,..:.. ...•,.:,:.:.:.:.:.. ...-,::,,....;:,' r i !, �, . , ,„.• . ..,,, f n;• , ",. . . . , , . . . . . . ,. . , . : . .. , .. ,. , , 1 . . . . . . . . Xo . . . . . . .. . , , . .. . . .... . . . . . .. . . . 1, . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . , , . , . 1 . . . .. . . : . . ... .. . . . , .. . ,. . . . 1 ,. . . , , . : . , . . ,. . . , . , ,. :, , . . , . . , ., , . . . . . , , . . : . .. ,, . . . . .. . . , . .. .• , . .. , „ . . . . . , , . , . 1 . . . . „. . . . ,. . .. . . , r• � • f i, .� a /y cALCULATIONS � �7y/� /jJfq�\p'p�/Dpi' i � . . L ., ... . . , :., . , ”, pew/ inlF.ar LEA. ?! J, . . .. . . , ,. :. ,, : .. . • �: 1: . . ... . . : . 1 . :: ' H. 1.-.. ... : . . , . , . .. . ., .., :. . . ., , . . . . ,.. , .. . . . . ,. . . . ,,.. : . . . . , . .. " . . , . .. . . . ,I. . . .. . ., . , . . . .. . . . . . . ,, ,. . ..... . . , . . . .. . . :. , .. . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . ,, . . ,. . ." , : . 1, . " .• , , , . , . . . . . .. I . , . , . . , .,.., .. . . . . . ., . , . . , ., ,. ., . . . .. .,... _,. , . . . . .. .. . , : .,. H . , .;,.,." ..• , . , , . „ . . • . . , . . . . . , . .. . . . . • , . . . . , . , . ., . . . . . . , . . . .. . . . . . . . . . , .;:::,,H, '',: , ., ,. ,, :. • • l ^ n • ,. / n ' 4 to _ 10. . p tl1,, --SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION -SIGCAP VERS(21jan87) INTERSECTION: TIGARD'GREENfURG AND MAPLELOW . VOLUMES: AM PEAK 1k..: METRO,SIZE: 20,000 TO 1001000 ANALYST: DICK WDELK !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !. C= 90 G= 74 V= 16 I ! ! ! ! ! ! t************t********** I 1 ! * * ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * SERVICE LEVEL R r ! ! ! ! ! ! * SATURATION 55% ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 ! APPROACH LANE GEOMETRY ! s SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST ! LANE ! MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH ! . - i 1 ! RT, 12.0 RT. 12,0 RY. 1210 RTL 12,0 ! 2 ! LT. 12.0 Tff 1110 L,T, 1210 L.Y 1210 ! 3 ! LY. 12.0 L.. 12.0 ..„0 .., ,0 1 MOVEMENT VOLUMES ! MOVE SATURATION ! MOVEMENT LOS APPR ! LT TH RT TOT ! LT TH RT ! LT TN RT ! • . SOUTH ! 95 340 155 570 ! 26% 557, 557. ! A B 8 ! , . j NORTH ! 35 370 10 415 ! 25% 55% 55% ! A E A ! HEST ! 5 10 35 50 ! 22% 227, 261 ! A A A ! ` 1 AST ! 4tl 5 5 50 ! 26% 251 267. ! A A A APPR! TRKS! !X WLK!PEDS? NO! ! PHASING ! •{ '• ..•I..ww!..._,..-! H---- -www.11----w! !------u r.A ww.._«rwwrw ^.Mw w rw-..w--! S ! 5.0%! ! S ! -- ! ! ! N ! 5.0%! ! N ! ..••. ! !N/S-DIRECTION SEPARATION (C-4)! • 1,1 ! 5.01.! ! W ! ! 15/0-DIRECTION SEPARATION (C-4)! E ! 5.0%! ! E ! -- ! ! ! y', ! APPROACH V/C VALUES ! t. MOVE ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST ! "• `, °. LTR ! .1055 .0000 .0000 .0135 ! t S TR 1 ,1315 ,1056 .0000 ,0056 LT ! .0806 .0000 ,0053 ,01.25 ! 14 R ! .0750 .0056 .0194 .0028 ! R --ADJ! .0000 .0000 .0144 .0000 T ! .0944 ;1028 0056 .0028 ! „,r. L ! .0303 ,0201 .0029 ,0128 ! +a ! LEG VOLUME ! ! TIME AVAIL ('SECS)! MOVE STORAGE ! • . " ►r�, LEG ! AT LOS C ! APPR ! LT TH RT ! LT 'TH RT ! ■ �e w.c:...r.:l. Nr.. ,.d .......w, ,.. )) SOUTH ! 0 ! SOUTH ! 26.3 26.3 26.3 ! *4* #*# 0 ! • r v ',;r;' Y # NORTH ! 0 ! NORTH ! 21.1 21,1 21.1 ! 34 102 0 ! WEST ! 0 ! WEST ! 13.3 13.3 89.6 ! 0 16 24 ! 1 ^ EAST ! 0 ! EAST ! 13.3 13.3 13'.3 ! ft* :WW# 0 ! i,„ ", ;; 'nn'* .. CALCULATE MANUALLY ry ` �1t N --SIGNALIZED INTERSECT ION --SIGCAP-- VER5(21jan87) t INTERSECTION: TIGARD GREENBURG AND MAPLELEAF VOLUMES: EXISTING PM PEAK METRO SIZE: 20,000 TO 100,000 ANALYST: DICK WOELF; , !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE ! C= 120 G=104 Y= 16 ! ! ! ! ! * SERVICE LEVEL D—L, ., ! ! ! ! ! ! * SATURATIONS 85"l, # ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !'— —_!— _ —! *********************HH APPROACH LANE GEOMETRY ; I SOUTH NORTH WESTEAST ! � LANE. ! MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH ! '' 1 . RT, 12,0 RT, 12,0 R,, 12,0 RTL 12,0 •:,P 2 . L T. 12,0 Tr 1 12.0.0 p er 12.0 L d 1 2,6 • 3 ! L.. ' 12.0 L,'. 12,0 LT, 12.0 .0 !' MOVEMENT VOLUMES . !, MOVE SATURATION '. MOVEMENT LOS APPR ! LT IN RI TOT ! LT TH RT ! LT TH RT SOUTH ! 502 490 16 1008 ! 85% 85% 85% ! D—E U-E 8—E NORTH ! 24 643 18 695 ! 99% 85% 05% ! A 8—E D—E WEST ! 34 9 491 534 ! 20% 28% 85% ! A A 8-E 0 EAST ! 698 22 44 764 ! 85% 25% 251 ! D—E A A ! APPR IRKS, L� DS NO PHASING „ [L. - ! ! ! ! , —W .,PE PH SI X A N „ 5 ! 2,0%! ! t N !,2,0%! ! N ! ! N/S-DIRECTION SEPARATION' (C-4)! [ilL W ! 2,0%! ! W ! __ ! IEIW—DIRECTION SEPARATION (C-4)! E ! 2,0%! ! E ! ► ! APPROACH V/C VALUES M OVE i SOUTH NORTH WEST EAS T e , LTR ! .1867 ,0000 .0000 .2122 otft, TR ! .1406 .1864 ,0000 .0357! ' LT' ! .1837 .0000 .0239 200 ! R ! .0089 .0156 .1515 .0244 ! R —ADS! .0000 .0000 .1179 .0000 ! .�_ T ! ,1361 .1786 .0050 .0122 ' L ! ,1503 0188 .0195 .2229 ., ! LEO VOLUME ! ! TIME AVAIL (SECS)! MOVE STORAGE ! LEG YY, AT L05 C . APPR `. LT TH RT , LT TN RT . ..i•,.,......_I_M__..{.. N..._1 .� 1 I I 27.2 1 SOUTH , 0 SOUTH ,� 7 f 7, 0� .. ' 1 NORTH ! 0 ! NORTH T ! 27,2 27,2 27,2 31 433 0'�! i 1 WEST . 0 9 2 17.2 �� . 0 T�� WEST 7� 4 4 �1� 258 W E , EAST ! 0 ! EAST ! 32.5 22.5 32.5 ! O#f *#i! 0 ft* = CALCULATE MANUALLY • Viz•» :, r` , tilt I ' I --SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION --SIGCAP--IVERS(21janB7) INTERSECTION: TIGA:D GREENDURG AND MAPLELEAF VOLUMES: EXISTING PM PEAK METRO SIZE: 20,000 TO 100,000 ANALYST: DICK UOE'LK !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE ! C= 90 G- 74 Y'.. 16 ! ! i ! ! ! ! #********######**###t*.** ,a. ! ! ! ! ! ! , * SERVICE LEVEL E * ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * SATURATION 89% ,.,� ; ' !' ! ! ! ! * !--_- ! ! ! ! ! ! **ft*********ft********# APPROACH LANE GEOMETRY SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST ! " " LANE ! MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH ! . 1 ! RT. 12 0 RT, 12,0 R., 12,0 RIL 12.0 ! - 2 ! LT. 12.0 I6, 12.0 R.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 ! 3 ! L.. 12.0 Lrr 12.0 LT. 12.0 ... .0 MOVEMENT VOLUMES ! MOVE SATURATION ! MOVEMENT LOS APPR ! LT TN RI TOT ! LT TN RI LT TN RT ! ' SOUTH i502 490 16 1008 ! 89% 89% 89% ! E E E ! NORTH ! 24 643 28 695 ! 23% 89% 89% ! A E E WEST ! 34 9 491 534 ! 32% 32% 95% ! A A E EAST ! 698 22 44 764 ! 89% 301 30% ! EI A A ! APPR! IRKS! !X-WLK!PEDS7 NO! ! PHASING �w S ! 2'07! 1 S ! -- i N ! 2.0%! ! N ! -- ! !N/S-DIRECTION SEPARATION (C-4)! N ! 2.0%! ! W ! -- ! !E/W-DIRECTION SEPARATION (c=4)! ... E ! 2.0%! ! E ! -_ ! ! APPROACH V/C VALUES ! �' MOVE ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST ! LIR ! .1867 .0000 .0000 .2122 TR ! , 406 1864 .0000 .0367 LT ! ,1837 .0000 .0239 .2000 ! R 156 . .02 ! .0089 .0156 151 0 .1515 02 44 R -ADJ! .0000 .0000 ,1195 .0000 ! T ! .1361 .1706 .0050 .0122 ! L ! .1603 .0138 .0195 .2229 LEO VOLUME ! ! TIME AVAIL (SECS)! MOVE STORAGE LEG ! AT LOS C ! APPR ! LT TN RT 1" LT TN RT ! 1----------..-•__----I------ +.....;I r.....:- ,• SOUTH ! 0 ! SOUTH ! 19.3 19.3 19,3 *#* 4%* 0 ! Y Y . � r ' NORTH ! 0 �! NORTH ! 19.3 1� � 19 8 ! 24 330 0 WEST ! 0 ! WEST ! 12,4 12.4 31.7 ! 0 46 199 r EAST ! 0 ! EAST ! 23+0 23.0 23,0 .1 # *# 0 4*# = CALCULATE MANUALLY •.�• ^{ :. ;� Vim' � r "..", "' • .1 • • r��r 'a,..w' .! .�. . ._.��.._ ..,u. ..-.. •, ,....,_..., �.-�1 «n ,...-h. ? ., .. .,..� _., .�..w..4_4�..a.sw......•i n .. --SIGNALIZED I N T REE w IT I ON x» s i f cAM — M VERS(2 1 G � � ) ' • ry h xGf I ry IJNn T r 1q L GC E k LJ! G AND HWY 217 RAMP, . r° VOLUMES,. EXISTING AM PEAK Ai:: ... METRO SIRE: 20, 000 TO 100, 00 ANALYST: D I I ;WOEL� 0 • !PHASE HASE ! PHASE !PHASE 1 F HAS E !PHASE !PHASE l C= 90 i : 7e ' Y= 12 ! I ! ! ! ! **'?{*3i***.**•*.****.*****3{** I 1 •, • ;.� ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * SERVICE LwEVEL.. 8 * w " . ! ! ! ! ! ! it * SATURATION 1 81% ! !' ; 1 ! 1' 11 ! ,. �. ! Y. ,-- ! • —"wr.r«!_«,,w_..«_Y «... ! ..:«MM«.•w«p.YY.!------ I ..x»«,...N. wY ! **************' '.x.*******, 1� ! • P I �! I-1 MAf�s;I Mc��c�s�L_Tr.s I ! 3Gl I I-1 h C y NO R11-1 C ,.,f I LLAIhsC: ! MOVE W I 0 T MOVE WIDTH» MOVE WIDTH� r � , MOVE W I D r H wl«w YN,W«.x•. I rM«.•.W,.x-.r«w„«Y.»..,YYI»N»u..Yx w» a Nh.,«..iJ».••i..,.Mr«•.1«,«Yw.rr»w,.•.!«xi w».L.y YM wN.a««.Y MN w�Y.w w rw w«r,w M4.«..i r«w«««.r,N Mh.wµnn,rr u••«,,.rr«w 1r«I w•rr l � .1 ,• r w i (, -r. . 12.0, , f'•.M % 12. 0 n it 4 n0 I 1,�.N, . 4..:.,, W 0 ! •1' ! •« 1'2. %l T t N 1 J } VJ q p tl 0 LT. 11::„ K I! I . • .o 1- 1 2% 0 b t d 4 0 k . tl . } ! • . , MOVEMENT VOLUMES MOVE SATURATION MOVEMENT LOS A-Fi ! LT TL-! R`1x TOT ! LT TH . IM;T ! LT TH Rf1 i' , 1 w«-«..•..�w....w yw I «..«Y.Y,.:Y.0 N«N«w-»N..«Y...«.«Y«,wr.««. ..w«ww.r«.•«..NxYM U.«-«r w. ! «.-««+««..,«.n....riY wY Mh.»..I»..Y.w«...»Y.MY—«w.«.«-,h (iYY ..w.. r xrY,»�«.«'x•Yww N,. ! SOUTH ! 205 425 0 6 Q ! 37% 6 1/ 0% !I U M Y ! Norm--1 ! 0 32c 110 430 ! 0% 61% 48% ! . . . S A ! . tH/ SUfIM 0/ff Wl/b' A M p „ . tl . . . EAST ! 130 0 32 455 ! 37 0% % ! !, Asp PR! TriKS ! ! X—WLML'.. ! Pi:«,DS? NO! ! PHASING 1 • • • Nu xM wY M.. w,Y,Y.«4w. w..«. ...,, NM»h,.««rwY .«•1{I..••»..N M«YM !«,«wY x,..w.4 1 .' ' 1 , MY,+,.rNN.YY WIIw«I«wLW«r NlY wr Yw M✓w,i.rl.wY»rw»w«.,•N«N Y.Y YY.».4»N Y+..-»aVn�Y I I r s 1 - 07 1 1 ! .Y _ i t � . . ,. ., — N ! 5, 0% ! ! N ! ..w- ! !N/S—DIRECTION' SEPARATION OW I (I - 4) ! I • W ! .0%! ! W ! rw»»_ ! !r/W—DIRECTION SEPARATION i.C—4) ! , , . '� ! . "� ! ! ! wnx.1 ! ! I MOVE ! SOUTH NOR TH WEST EAST I ! ' � .r .•,-"..-•„«!«M...h Mai 1+»«�µw.r...",,r.»«1.rl.aµ..rr wr wr w{..dY.Iw»N.Yr.w.Y.h ...r.».«r..x Y...Mr i.x..uY!w � ' � cif; �i •. R ! e0bo nIosii ;(800 ! . 1808 ! '' . ,.i., ! .2361 .0 w 5 00000 .0000 1 0 ! ,f L ! . 1178 a 0000 .C6f r 0 �4 0747 ! x, • ( 1 !� TIME AVAIL (SECS) MOVE STORAGE AwE ! r AP PR ! . LEG r (" LOS C t AL' R LT TH RT ! ,LT TH RT ! • __'_—__ !_—_-------_--_—__— ! -----_---_—__--1 . . SOUTH ! 8f: 0 ! SOUTH ' 38.5 38.5 .0I !I 147 04 0 !NORTH• ! 573 1 NORTH ! 14. 9 14 5 ! 5 EAST+ 1» ! 275'! ,! ! EAST 1 25. 1 .0 35, 5 ! 0 0 228 ! I I d {r A \ q' • •i r• ::,, - --SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION - -s rocAr w VEE:S'r21 janS7:) r .A.:*!;:, tI N1TEf rrsEc.7°I ON" TAI G.iAAFel IGf1,E}E:NESURG AND hHWY :217 Ni .ANIP 1�0L.N�J1.'«f 9w nl .1 tw+N� k 141 PM PEAK', , ,h 'a(•'. METRO S. L Ew w 2;0,000 TO 100'g 000 , ANALYST: D I C Hr'. �i0E...I..«I•,:. !PHASE !.1:1-1A SE 'PHASE ' ! F'HA"",I !PI-ASE 1 PHASE ! C= 90 1;7i= � Y - 12 : nth I rwl«w wu NW wr I wH rrw xw it/w Ww I wwww .rw Nr I uww rN I •wr wu r1I .+rw wW wlr wNrrw'y• ,y . I ! **********4 ************* I ! I I I I y r * S C{J 1C E Lw I: V EL E , x. , , ! ! ' I, , I I ' . ! ! 4 ' SATURAT I C:)N 511% I« Nw w 1, w ww I WWww . y wMw I rw I w Www I ' ******l **** ****YIT*****w W g r i_, I M{ri rl ■�: r , N.i r,ft I� I t (wl M�., Arw! I�•.OA� ...I 1....'h.i ilr;x� .�G..w��E"f 1.{>t� I !' SOL1lj1H NORTH . WEST ' EAST ! , ,,, LANE ! : MOVE W I l 1H MOVE W I DTH l MOVIE. WIDTH MOVE WIDTH ! ' . . • r ww�fWl NW w+Ww',I i..w NI uW Mw Nw r.w Mw r«.r.w w.w!w rrlr.rr wr Nrrr wrN rW»Ww .»w .rw w NI.WW ww .r w» w. uw WN'NM wr r W ww Ww r.x wN W Mw rw Mw ww r.W.rlr wl w w wr rWl y , ��, W w w wY N u /�}� ,r, 1I 1 � ! � I'.fi tl 12. 0 Ire, a 1 2,N 0, a a a, a 0 Irr,p �. , 11'2.0 i ^. :I wt !,, � 'L..u, N 11.2,, 4i:1 I'a a 1:i''k ' d M,a u �•, Lx l a dl Ica 0' ! 1 I . ! 3 . • ! MOVEIYIEN`r VOLUMES S, �! MOVE EATUJRA'� ION ! MOVEMENT LOS y . , . • ; . AF'F`f: ! LNNf'I, 'rH Ir;°1 TOT' '! LT, TI "R t,' ' I. L:,wr' Ti..! Ii;.�I- ! • 'y k L rrwN O U.1{:1 11 H ! 205 Ir.I'WNr.1..4'wll 9 wr Mx2'W4 ww rrll Wfl 0 Nw 1w 897 NM!wr wN4 ur 7rlw%wNl,Mur. rMM 1r1 X wu , 0%{.M.! .r NUI lrA.r,l.w,wN wu wNE uW hW+W HNI.,a.w,wu u wU! , N1Jr;',1-H !• ' '( 1 i 1�2' 4.� ) 1581' ! ►p/ '91 l 71./ ! a n a, E C ! • . WEST � ! ' 't (.?� 0 .0 ! 0% I I.. � � 5 W/ M �/s vw'!a 1 a h a 11 ► a a s D ,'1 ' ' E:A T ! 20 0 4 70'? ! ����r �0% 91%1 ! IN� a k . ,, ! • 1. . f • {ri AP PR y .1-1;/..KS! I W« (! wt tr"�t 1 �E� 'PHASING ' ! Ai�r' ,. ! i I�GWP�, ,I`" wD,� O � � r rrr iMr wr WN I Wu rr NW ww r+W ( I Wx Nw filwurl w.l I wr4r.N WW r11.l Wfl Wr�w{w«Mu WU l I N{N lu+e w.wrl Mr wWNN.WW riu"wr W{f iHU wW r+.Ww won wNtlw ww wWw NfW.r.irn+V+W Ww.rN l...+rW wN Wn Ww P • aG � �!3 I 5.0'./.' f Y I t�t I w, w W —DIRECTION I1 1, I � N I 5. 0% ! 1 N ! I r„ r AR AT ICN� t C-410 ! , {, W I I a 0% ! ! W a {:rrNw ! !E/WNWD I F.1,EL:T X ON EATION EP (,C-41.) I' ' III a «N ! L'7 ! A `'I'E::OAC:ill1 ',V A: VAI UIES I, ° p MOVE ! 001JTH hNQ !T'H WEST EAST . , ' ' Er i N.w.i1.Y Iflr..w ru.i Nh f.w`»w wr ww..«w r..•e wN wn wr W.N I.w»rf'wN.wM iwN wr N.r NWY WN«w....,:w.q iw w.W Nw.ri w+W..,N:+rw f:wwu N.:l w w .w.Nw N«ww wa.y '. ! ►• (�y/��y 0r 1"l�;'y�y"' 0000 ,W'e 2 2) I r4 K W54lVG7A:1' a J:.{1:?GIiJ a n uA 'R —A0,1! 0000 .0 000 , , ', .0000 ' a 1 B 1 i ! 1" ' ' i a 38 a e� r 0 ' a'0000 b'0I~00 !'' ' t • lw ! . i 1,70 y 0000 .0 ►00 , i�17i ' I ' . ' ! LEI.-:ti VOLUME y ! TIME AVA X,L (S c ') I MOVE' 5 t TGah". G I ` LEG , ! AT Lt S Iwf ! APPI. I L,TI TH RIT. 1! LW r' TNT h"f ! frr WW'wW wW WII N..•il I wrW Wr{I«wrwW wr wrr ww l.Irlrw WWI 'LIN wr Ywl wlf lnN w.r I W..r:N W4 W4•'++N+N{Ir,w.WlWw wW NW WN Wr lrMWil wu W.W rr.N 1 WWwrI WN WW,WN.WIIWwrW.rr.r w{WN NW WrrN:Nw SOUTH ! 1894 ! SOUTH, ! 27.,5 27:0 w a 0 ! 17E 4Jw',`7 ! . i fM) Ir r fw i 1 i t .w I 1\10 r T'I I !' 2,.�:8. ! I MLI I '.`I I-1'' ,! W 0 2,a 9 ,a' . ,! 0 482! .-:'.1441. W I S T I '523 I WEST S!'�' I .0' a 0 ' i 0 0 ' ' 1� y . , ' w EAw>7" ! 585 ! ' EAST ! .8 a'FYI .'''0'� ' 0 U 5 I 0 0 .�.t77 ! ' • I • r , 4" ' 1 1I t •.y .l,',Y .r .. , w r, r r . ♦ ,1 ( r • • .4 }, 1 1 - . rw t"•' N «. - r .. w w..«w�' wr r ; 1N�I`IAI«r� Lw � 1 raTwr. ���1-rlr ,� Gi��w. F vl�.., s. w1. �, 7.y • I NTE'F:iEC I oi`:i T 11:AR GF:E_N NHtJF:O 'ANO !-1WY .217 M r:AMP ,r VOLUMES a f X I.ST I N�:a AM PEAK ; I METRO SIZE ;r , C 00 Tp 1.O 2,O0?.1 ANALYST n 1w, UT, wF:; 6JClFLwk:: • !P ' !P ASE !PHASE !PHASE' !PHASE !PHASE 'f C= 9 13= 78 Y'+H 12' - w a 1I i ! ! ! 1 ! ! ! , ! ' ! ! ,...SERVICE Li NFL C * } .l'''' ! ! I t !' ! ! # SATURATION r 66% #• , 1 + ' ■-..--.- ..«.1«,. t w. ww.w..rwww I rr,W..,,.,f.,:.. I rrww+w«w..rw ( mr 1 w.,r..--wN-.r 1 ***4 ******************** •• • . 1 'AFP'r».:OA�:.F� LwANi l 13EoMrr Ti�::Y i ' ! t 1 sourF•i ' .NORTH WEE>«14 A T ! LANE'1 ! MO'VL ',W I DTI'-I ' :MOVE WIDTH MOVIE WIDTH .MOVE, WIDTH, ! 1, u.w,u...r...w. ! w,w w,.,7._..w w.w wr f.w...w...,.....t.WI.«w,..0 j.N.w,. w ..r ..rr. ...rw,w. „w: ,«.«wr wr ., r w «w:.... .:w...+....,..w« .,.. t R , fl . �,1 1 1 '1•'7:•:v tr 1 2...,0 ''� T a a 1 2 0 1 Fl.,. a ,L:1.,N }0 a n a n r ! ., � � .+:«' t ., 1 n IN 1 2 n 0, L�i n , ' ' 14 2 n 0' LTn 1.I:.��a L:.i' u u n ' a 0 ! t OH: .1 '`. �«/ n x a a LCJ I.1«N r 1.PW n n tl a n r a n ::. ' MOVIEMrF;NTT V 1Lostl 13 !, . MOVE SAT UR,A`1"I'ON i MOVEMENT L,rO"3 ! ,� 6 ti a,w'51 '.) r,« TOT I N,. I ml« I 'r,1M t " 1'' �.y. - -, �•,I H r"f:. I� r 71��f I". r !„r T I F-I I {r 4-r T F-I f.r • ” wH ww MH w«w«a w.f 1 . «rl wr wr rr wlr rr.1.,1 w.,wll,....rw wr«M r1,N w«wN mN w.Wr w..r«.w.r ,H w N+.w.,wlr.m.M,1 Iwf r14.rr I++Nw«w r r rw.wl 1...1 h h,!w.l w«„«1 wN Nlr«w wN.—•1.,+.ww ( r, �• , ' � r5 +,} (� Jay /'�� f . � I) 'V' Boa"Tf'1 1 W. 440 2'45 El8 ! 0" 6C.•+!1{a 1»2/w ! e N . 'M: A ! H I�•I(«)1"�: (w 1-•! ! 14 i , 1 Gri �'�'5«•,I VC./ : ! ,.B In E5 G% ' ,, 0'4... ! A Iw, .,'.'...' 1 ' W1 5.'8T t ' 190 0 235 425 ! , 68"/.. ' ' 0% '5214 ,.! C .0:0'• 8 I �}1 r (�y 0% (�a rn"/ ( 1' .,q _ EAST 1' ,S(J 0 c 0 !' 0% �L.��d ',0% a a Af W a a' ,. a a H i' . « w .f 1 w 1 « . 1 ' . APr t I�;;! r J;:L.:{s„,,! ! X-W L f,:,! Fir..DS? r\IC� ! ! F H AS 11\1►N� ! . � s!a + Iw M ! I t t.W {.... 1 I «{hr«m w•«wu wr.•h..W wuµw w«wr ww w mH r ! �, } 1 d 1/ N 1 r /� �� ��1.� I ae H�r A�A �cr t.L �1 , ' ,. 'W !' 5":0%.1. ' ! W ! -r«W ! C/W«,.:),:G ',iZ►.TION SEEy'A :AT:CON ' ;(i�: �•�), ! b.,.;1. « w w ! AF'F'I*:OAcI'-J V/C VALUES-„ ' ! , ' MO,,VE ! SOUTH NCJ ::TH ' WEST ' 5ASl' 1 f ww'{W i+w rnw w.w « .1•+w1,uw I(j� :.F,'•,,,. p•� +y�! li fJ,s.l�4.J J. 11 IL.7 Si.J K.! 0.1306'p d tCJ 1W 1Gl ! R w...AD•..1 ! b,{L 0 0 '00000.. I.'0E1 / :H00000 ! r �ry �y �7{ }•y��y ».y �r T ! 02444 n 1 8�EJ�-�• . KJ00 is 0000 I I.. L. ! k.0000. a 04 EJ 3 '0 i 0'i�' Cr 0 m ! 1 . ! LE ' VOLUM ! , TIME AVA x L. c,8 u.,:53:a ! MOVE'" STTcif:A► E ! . ( 1 "� A.r 1 F r Iw wt.« ! wCJw �w: ! AIw'h'im` I I.:ui' 1°IN �,T ! L ' TH f,;',:T ! }• • . ' wu u:« w wu u, t Wu wN wr w««wwm.r,{ww irN NM N1r.,W www«.N+4r rw,Yw 'W rwr.l wH1..,,ww ww wr{wN w:�{,w.Mr,.ww Wr w,w 1 dl OUTH ! i 0I 1 ! soUTH !' 81 a'5 G 0 1 ! 0 82'7 .52\` NO :'.TH ! 8'32 ! NO TH ! 2' 8 ,250.8.. a 0 ! E 274• i !WESr ! 8, 1 ! W1= T ! 16 0 ►:, .7 1,0 0 �.: u ! �••,fWl 1 '1 1 ' ' EAST ! 32: I ' EST,'. ! '. �;r a m, { 0 0 0 I i 1 , I tl r , , I r ,, 7 f 1- _ { • • • . ro.Y,,, r 1- . . L,, --SIGNALIZED I NTf-RSECT I tDN, -_..-S I13CAP.r..-w VEIT:S t.21,jan87)• • °,- I NTE.r:: ,ET.1..I ON p T I GAR:DD GREENDURG AND HWY 17 SRAM ' ' VOLUMES; E X I S T I Ne PM PEA!..:: ' ' ' '2' : METRO S I w E a 20;000 TO 100 Y 000 , ANALYST: DICK WOEL :. !I='faA E , HA ly ! PHASE HASC: ! f•'f-IAS!; ! 1::-, l3=w 78 `f 1,� ! 4 !....„.........4.....,-.41, ....—...... !4 . WNNN w. I ..wrwNw.;..w_. ! - _rN ! `,.,,,:r.,::.1., ! s : ! ! " ::, !,H ! , ! ' ********•*****•***"*•} ***.*y{.* : r � ! ! I H 1 ' ' ,I. SERVICE L.�EVEIl,. F -',-1,"4....., : ! ! ! 1 ! ! ' ! •, ' 'SATURATION,. . 106% 3� , , I w w W.M. N_ ! rwN.W I w-r{,.INwN N ..N.;r w I - w,wW. ! t��3 . r�� g �*9 *k****pfi **} :. r r R , 1_, s E GEOMETRY' r i i i . 1 !, SOUTH ' NORTH,: 4t!ES"1", ' , EAST ! • . „ . " au ' LANE ! MOVE W T D TH MOVE. WIDTH MOVE W 1 DTH1 ' '''MOVE 4W4 I 1 TH ! I " 1,N-....,1..W-... f MIl r.11.r..M.._..W-WN,w..Nw-r.rr,w..wN-.r-r..r..wwr W..wr-INN«.wM WM JM ww.W+.Nw MN„rNrw.N{N wr JM,Ww NW w...rwl M«Jw.rNw,.M..r.N,.M WJ NN,wrl4rl mN NM Uw Mw wN.ra wN.ww rw wr i '• U t F',. R Ji..M %J T. v 1 L tl K M n 12 d K n v n tl ,', ' ,.. 2 ! ';' , 12 n (21 L.. V' 1:L k'0 LT n , , .4 2. 0 u v . : ' 'H Y.! ! , ' 1 •.: v n' l'..1. L. v ! ' MOVEMENT OG-.UME , !, MOVE SATURATION ! MOV "IMil..Nr t...053 1 f �. i .. AP PR!Ir. Ci.: r '�rl i 1�. r rn r .( i':�1 Ti ri�I 1�{ r 1 IJ. �� r'I-1 IT,r , • WN,M.{WMN.w.N,b, ! _llwuwwMr MWwYlr...wwuM,W,wW....Nwu......ww,,„,..„w.,„,rr N.Nw !, wrr.w.I M-..1-wNw.1 NU...«WN w,YW„,..„ w11wNW-NW _.,...,,.,,....'...,:,::....;'....,,,,...,.,....,.....,.,....•r W-rW ! (V ti �( "° � 485 1 � I � J� i ��/ '3',"...5% ! n . A ! NOr:1-1-4 , ! 6 '{;1 7',1'.)6 0 1345 1 j7% - 1061 0% ! 8, r , k ! . . . . WEST ! �-� `5 0 45 670 ! 1 G6,�r4 t / ' '., �>+ ! 1-� . . Ht-1 '. ! . ' EAST ! 0 1S: 0 0 ! V1/ 0% 0% ! b . M• Y v v (2 . tl ! •i, 4 , .6, r�r. Trr.l:: ! ! ;�JWWLft:. !!��E DS . NO ! ! Iw 1.-1AS I NG ' , � 1 -44_4-44r I_.,_I.MN......w. ! I wurwwN.--rW I WJ...N-.rwrrw NWw11WNNN.-M ! I«u..N.IN,NWN!••..uNWNN..IMI.WNN w 1.rh Nw NWw i.wi{..WNwWwN.r.INwuul Mrrlu NN.wu N.,.ww.W«Wr 1 a ' ' N !,� 5. 0"/. ! N ! �:..W:. ! ! !vI{�'S—DI E TION EPA .ATION , 4: ! ' t'i� ? � ,, ' W . 5. 0% W E;r W"MD I F ECT I ON 8f.EF,Are.AT I ON , ,>(,c-_ )1 4 i nor/�1 ! E` f u:N.N ! I ! ! APPROA! :H V/C VALUES 1 MOVE , ! 3OUT 1,•I' . .NO ;TI.11 WEST EAST_ ! � �. . ti rWHlww Ywi NW�! MNNW rW MM L41.4 r1�1 uM NlY rw wr rw.NbY.+ruN'NW wM Nw r.M N �WN JWW Jw UW MIj NLI Iww.W.iuWN Mw N. idr 14 NM rwi Ynil l- t�� tt !� a 0E3�:=r, ,0 yy,,0t�0: w.1 ',.'� n otcijtoo 'I R ",.`'t 1),I! .004 00 ..00 0 .'101 i" ' ',.000 ! i' : ,. T ! .28';34 .408 n 0 100 .. •tl 00 ?. ! . . ' L ! a 000 1, , . 1S44 44 ;`2443 , a 0000 ! •14. ! L.F 'VOLUME ! ! T I 1E•, AVAIL ,SE► `S.a ! MOVE TOF:Ar,"' l . LE$ ! AT LWoS i:l ! ,AP I61';'?, ! 1 LT '1"H NT LT TH NT !! � M4 NW N I SOUTH, ! tC!" H !` q 8 r ! 8toUr " I ( 2:::::', 0 ,W: , W � ! 185' ! NORTH } 1 4 d 6 34. 8 .6 !NOT' PLIABLE AT i ' r r• Wi;,i �{ ! i,4yy4 ! w15s:r, 1 s:!V:fs+ 4.0 4�ru 4' !��IHyXS LEVEL D ! �� L. �sT, ,! +5 d, ! EAST ',-,',',0 n, .0 wlSE V1'C1'w,', I 4 'jai Ire.'.. e.a.•.,.r,,.......,.. 24 , ,_ .-,....rte..,.... .,.�.._ ..•4.._ .. .... _ ,....�..w•r.:.l r......u.W.,�......-.a, .., )Jp ifr$ --SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION _-S I GC r--r_ YER"(. 1 a,1e I) ! ,, INTERSECTION: T I!WiA1•';,O GF E.ENF 1 F Iii AND ,HWY Jam''17 01;AMf-, . 3', ' VOLAJME a n EXISTING PM PEAK ' METRO SIZ E n 20„ 000 TO 100, 000 , ANALYST: DICK WOELK 9 ', «s 1 w I — I _ w. w ! •r w ! w w I W 1 �1 ,I"'I•�C�oy-�E .on co wr. , f I•Jr�.alw . r HA . I r.-t- .I f�lr�:�r w 1 !,r•= 1 r�0; 13=108 >✓= ��w .. !_I» -- ! ! —..'..—.... 1'...—......,W, ! N-" - ! —.r. ! • ! ! I ! 1 I I *****Y�*****'7{***********1 . p ' .:� '' I. I I. ' ! *• SERV I CE LEVEL F * I ! I'! ! H ! ! !' * ' SATQ :A`1"ION 402% * ' 1 !- - ---!-'--' — — !----'-'-....H —....•wN w••wn i .» •N•;W, ! »nu w .NY w No ! **************$********* a J ' I AF�r'IM OAI.:H LANE GEOMETRY ' ! ' ! ! ',SOUTH, 1oF: f"wI WEST EAST ,' �, INANE ! ff .G u»w•». wH ! r•N_..MoVE xW rYr 1«0wn°Ww Fr°•1 uX1Y� ' w«' MOVE H WIDTH'.r ,Fl • w r••w: ,..Mw..OVE WIDTH .•.w««W r.«w»M.»O,.•••V•u„wE n..w WIDTH ! „ ', ;� 1 /y� "� 2 '0 (k ! f�l d d :1.•,i.•I? T•H� x�tl 'O 1.2..(��y �l d�♦t �aul p T.J tl M �tl tl(�p� ! i 2 1! T. a 12 tl 0 L.., . 12 0 l.rlr a 1 a 0 . . d . : tl 0 ! G ri•,, 1w1 d . tl b T•J INr M O •l u'p }'..! H C d d �,J d L b ■ Y.: ( ' MOVEMEPN T VOLUMES MOVE OAil JPAT I ON MOVEMENT LOS ! ,j 1 »N w1 w,. , ' . A I I'"(�. 1 L r f"I'"f 11•. ( f"CJ 1 L.C' I"{'"I i'��r r L.T ) f�•I IT, I" 1 ; .' WM WI.w N,N wx !'r n1« , •w«1«wl•r ulu«I.1 H,N,•w HW Nwf,wHr w••NYrw•lii••w.r•'IYW ! WNHr} Wr w••uw Y,N««r wu«•n Nw»,1 NYW«N ! rI WU FW rH•«.w«r•W«ww lr N{rr WM lnri W4 Wr»rl ! 1'r^ m, ' i SOUTH i. 0 4 s 1�.3 115» 6Øc r 0 a!.. 402% 0 % » w J ! . .. a • A 1 i l o'� '�W 11-1 ! 09 7 2 6 0 1 r" 4./ ! 54% 1 0a2% w/ ! E r 1 1k I h . . r ,, WEST, ! 445 0 •Iirr45 610' I %x.51 ! 4 02% 0%, 4/•�•ly�,rM ! lµ d ,'N Al � ): • [•,- 1 ' 1 : '„ EA�y { „ I 0 0 , 0. 0 ! 0% 1 % 0%' , �. . w a u . ,u d d ! , .. M�wi r! •;,�;1'S ! ' ' i i _�W S 1 1 ! ! PHA'...” i ! )i , A I . , I� X�'l�J t:N 1 f C 1D� f"�I� . �► 1al 1 r ' ,«I u,r4•N»'! ,« W1 nl•1 Wl, ! 1 "rul N W1 W ! W»uW r•«x• w wN u•u«u.Wx u•• ! 1 «N•1,W,•W.,wu 3r..::.:�1 wrr w,h w YX«u,IIN1 W 4 4Hr wN W»r•rH N Nr'1 WurW wu uN.W w»w•Y W«uu.WI i !� J 1 L ! LJ a 0"I'! ' ! S I ..N N» N ! 0./ 1 ! N ! w ! ! o ! !N/0-�D I~ECT I ON SEPARATION ,t :-4:a ! ' W ! S. 0%1 1 W ! ! !E/W--,DIRECTION SEPAF AT I ON ', CD'-4)A „ f', E . d 0% ! 1 VN 1 1 '� 1 MOVE ! SOUTH NORTH WEST, ', ' EAST i 11 :J r u lu W r .„.•Fr «r ur r••w Irr .....xw f«r www r wN rr«w Nr uw F•w wM ww Nw Iw LW Nw NW,Iw ru.rr WN,hr/d•w •r I.rr,rW rr rrn P•« rx •.••• luw W Y»Y »W Y w nr« hrr { , ! r 0639 a OOOL . 1361 ,00000 I H: : H'•• r %.•. • ! —ADS).• 1 0000 tl10000 .1.1000 a OOU O ! 1 ' i h 1. r 1 YEN ! tl`.,`::8J4 .4 84 H0.000 af0f0 ! , .. - 4' , • . ' I f1J000 ' n 1944 '7It '. 2 P'4 J r"0000 ! 1 ` 1 L5s VOLUME ! . ' I TIME AVAIL 'z:S :c:5;y ! ' MOVE STORAGE GE ! L ! AT nOu � ! 1 ArtPI ! L.T TH, PT ! LT TH RT I '''' ' ' ' '. wl'rrW WN MW„WU'I HFrr wu rM•ww WM SAM UY..rru HW Nw w« I' » .rr NFY,r«,NI«ir WuMW••l,rW.,rl•,}w NW«N wx N.N.�F NH,L,}Y MN wNNW r !w.Y WMU.:.r wF Wrrll,,.«rrW WWU F.«.rr•w«I' !,' ' ' SOUTH r 4 ! : SOUTH ! p 0 '31 .''5 O 1..t5 ,A STORAGE LENGTHS!NGTHS! • » F W w 1 .I W f�lLal".1.1~I ! rig!�) ! h��0�. Cwl a �l . �, QJ ! {'+lf�`C ,EI«N ClI:tLN . � , r 1 L WE, T ! ,..10 I WEST ! 2O,..(,,,, -6" ,1 6ø1 I rH I S LE,�EL:. or,: I ; , EAST' 1 597 I EAST ! ,; » C „ ) I SERV ICE it • I I • • 1 r 1 1 D ,_ • STEP 3 MOVEMENT FROM G/1 C T DT . , • CONFLICTING FLOWS MT — , 785; 758. VPH CRITICAL GAP = Y8 ' 6.0 6,0 SECS �, POTENTIAL CAPACITY = MN3 305, 376. PCH IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT = M3 = 363. 31, PCH `l DEMAND . MA — 0 0 PCH CAPACITY USED 00 .00 Y . IMPEDANCCE FACTOR — P3 — 1.001 1.001 ' a NO SHARED LANE'. r AVAILABLE RESERVE— 0 DELAY & LOS — N/A N/A I SHARED LANE WITH LEFT TURN SEE STEPS SHARED LANE DEMAND 0 0 PCH a� '.., POTENTIAL CAPACITY — N13 = 0, 0, PCH I AVAILABLE RESERVE —��E 0, 0., PCH I & I s.l. DELAY �t LOS � � � � N/A � N/A � � � � � • STEP 4 - LEFT TURN FROM C/D CL DL i. CONFLICTING FLOWS NH 740. 83. IVP �I ��7 H� CRITICAL GAP — TG — 6.0 6.0 SECS POTENTIAL CAPACITY—'= MN , 386. 363. PCH r• �� ADJUST FOR IMPEDANCE: 359. 332, PCH � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � NO SHARED LANE DEMAND t. 0 0 PCH I 11, AVAILABLE �E SERVE 0 0. DELAY & LOS N/A N/A lit WITH LEFT'& THRU SHARED LANE DEMAND — 0 0 PCN CAPACITY OF SHARED LANE t O. O. PCH AVAILABLE RESERVE — 0. O. PCH {! DELAY & LOS — N/A WITH,LEFTt, THRUI & RIGHT SNARED LANE DEMAND — 111 12 PCH i�.,. CAPACITY OF SNARED,LANE 417, 429. PCH AVAILABLE RESERVE 306. 417, PC)-1 DELAY & LOG t B A , .. .w—i:—r+ L+..—.:r vrw«.— - .a.p ----r .r-- -----u—_--*- 1 108 C VOLUMES. FOR LEG C FOR LEG D VEHICLES PER HOUR 261. 566 ' I rLIL Ji4{i 1•i— ♦irr VM1�4.1.J�lM� " rl�{rbi4r� ww{w.r r'n--I.irlil—i.a . I , i' "nl I Y iii VERS/87 v' ,.•ICI, m�l ,1 , ,n. �' , r V • UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY CALCULATION'FORM . 4-WAY INTERSECTION I CITY: TIGARD ANALYST: DICK WOELY, INTERSECTION: GREENBURG AND LOCUST ALTERNATE: EXISTING TRAFFIC METRO SIZE: 20,000 TO 100,000 r • I, COUNT: PM PEAK TYPE OF CONTROL: STOP LOCATION PLAN; APPROACH CODES ARE D LANE 1 2 3 4 GRADE= .0%1 � I A 4 4 2 3 • B 4 2 3 ; 1 GRADE= .0/ .. l' C 5 D 5 I A B I .. I l , GRADE= .0% ; ;- GRADE= .0%! ; SPEED: 35 MPH C r. ^:.y RESTRICTED SIGHT CODE IS I MINOR;STREET ADJUSTMENTS ° ACCELERATION LANE? NO CURB RADIUS OR TURN ANGLE? NO • ;' APPR 1 A 1 B 1 C 1 D ; MOVE 1 AL ; AT 1 AR 1 SL ; BT BR ; CL ; CT ; CR ; DL ; DT DR 1 '� i VOL 1 101 4711 451 451 5291 151 1051 61 501 201 51 301 PCH 1 111 1 ; 501 1 1 116; 71 551 221 61 331 1 LANES1 3 ; 3 I 1 1 1 STEP 1 RIGHT TURN FROM CID CR DR CONFLICTING FLOWS : MH = 494. 537. VPH CRITICAL GAP = TG = 5.0 5,0 SECS , POTENTIAL CAPACITY = 111 = 7i7. 653, PCH DEMAND - 55 38 PCIi . CAPACITY USED = 7,678 4.82B IMPEDANCE FACTOR : .948 .9G8 a � SHARED LANE SEE STEP 3 , � NO SHARED LANE - RESERVE = 0. 0, PCH r DELAY LOS = N/A N/A I u "' ....—.r_+:N:.i'.....r..1..1..r.-........l.....—.:rrw4. ... .,Tli ._ --.-uuw./.+w STEP 2 - LEFT TURNS FROM R/A SL AL II CONFLICTING FLDWo = MH : 516, 544. VPH CRITICAL GAP = TS = 5.0 5,0 SECS POTENTIAL CAPACITY = M2 = 699. 678. PCH „ 1 i DEMAND = CH ^ CAPACITY USED = 7,15 1.62 % I 4^:f IMPEDANCE FACTOR w .952 .590 AVAILABLE RESERVE-= 649. 667, PCH , DEL AY E b s A a - l L I I I Y• 1 ,. III I II , I I +�. a •- , •• .n .. .'J•• oil • Hr .•.,.... a.._ .._.... _ .., .... _', _ u...., w., .. , �.,a,.., .. ,. ,-. .,.�...... W fi 444444 ' • UNSIGNALIZED. INTERSECTION CAPACITY CALCULATION'FOR► 4—WAY INTERSECTION .' : E CITY: TIGARD ANALYST: DICK WOELK INTERSECTION; GREENRURG AND L'JCUST '� , ,',� ALTERNATE: EXISTING TRAFFIC METRO SIZE: 20,000 TO 100,000 .r IF COUNT: AM PEAK TYPE OF CONTROL: STOP • LOCATION PLAN APPROACH CODES ARE D )` . I[ LANE 1 2 3 4 GRADE ,0%1 1 , A 4 23 1 H., • B 4 2 3 _1 I GRADE= .0% D 5 B 8 5 GRADE- .O% 1 1- GRADE= ,0%1 i 1.., SPEED: 35 MPH C `•' ' 11 RESTRICTED SIGHT CODE IS 1 MINOR STREET ADJUSTMENTS — �;• ACCELERATION LANE? NO _ CURB RADIUS OR TURN ANGLE, NO APPR A ; B 1 C 0 NOVE� f AL f AT AR I EL f DT DR I CL f CT f CR 1 DL DT 1 DR . L 51 2951 751 01 251 51 01. 51 VOL 1 5 f 295 f 50. 701 3351 51 7 1 PCH 61 1 1 771 1 1 831 01 281 61 01 61 L 1 LANESI 3 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 ; . STEP 1 RIGHT TURN FROM C/O CR OR CONFLICTING FLOWS = MH = 320. 33G VPH CRITICAL SAP = T6 — 5.0 5.0 SECS POTENTIAL CAPACITY: MI : 855; 849. PCH .. E DEMAND = 28 6 PCH ._ CAPACITY USED = 8.237 .707 % ' IMPEDANCE FACTOR = .579 .996 v '0. ' L , SHARED LANE - SEE STEP 3 NO SHARED LANE — RESERVE — 0, 0, PCH DELAY Z1 LOS = N/A N/A 1 ,' 4�wu.V1 o,_rJh Yl�K•ni:..._M1' ''L � • STEP 2 LEFT TURNS FROM D/A DL AL CONFLICTING FLOWS = MN = 345. 340, VPH CRITICAL GAP _ TG : 5,0 5.0 SECS C. I T : M2 = 842. 847. PCH � POTENTIAL APAC Y�� �, DEMAND : 77 6 PCH CAPACITY USED - 9.14 .71 % I' IMPEDANCE FACTOR = ,537 .996 a i.'• 55. �R41.e �PCH. � �� i. AVAILABLE RESERVE 7 �, .. DELAY & LOS = A A 1` its• I p • Y !1 , -• ..,.a,..•.,.+-'. ...t u.,., .. � _ ._,...,s...__.. ,a....,...,a.a.✓11_r.»,._,..... ,_ ., „I. _ -,d,., .._,-,. „_ _._-»... ...:d�+..-n..._r,:.r,.:......,:.._ ' -' i • • • STEP 3 THRU MOVEMENT )<„ CONFLICTING FROM C/D CT DT FL O4r _ �T _ 1093. 1106 1108. VPH I I CRITICAL GAP = TG = 6.0 6.0 SECS POTENTIAL CAPACITY — MN3 - 232. 227. PCH . 7 IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT — M3 = 219, 214. PCH 7 6 PCH DEMAND — �t. , ,1 , 1 , CAPACITY USED = 3.02 2.64 IMPEDANCE FACTOR = P3 = .980 .983 NO SHARED LANE AVAILABLE RESERVE= 0, 0. PCT DELAY & LOS - N/A N/A . = SHARED LANE WI TH LEF T TURN _ S SEE STE P 4 I I SHARED LANE DEMAND - 0 O'' PCH I , 7 . :;:x POTENTIAL CAPACITY = M13 = 0. O. PCH AVAILABLE RESERVE = 0. 0. PCH r' DELAY°& LOS = N/A N/A ) STEP 4 LEFT TURN FROM C/D CL DL , CONFLICTING FLOWS = MH 1128, 1164. V 11 I a CRITICAL GAP = TG = 6.0 6.0 SECS �. POTENTIAL CAPACITY = MN = '221, 209. PCH IADJUST FOR IMPEDANCE;. 198. 183, PCH NO SHARED LANE DEMAND — 0 0 PCH I AVAILABLE RESERVE 0. O. IPCH •1 DELAY & LOS — N/A I N/A WITH LEFT h THRU SHAPED LANE DEMAND = 0 0 PCH CAPACITY OF SHARED LANE = 0. 0,' PCH AVAILABLE RESERVE = 0, 0, RCA DELAY & LOS w N/A N/A • • WITH LEFT, THRU, & RIGHT I , �• S ABED LANE DEMAND i1g 6 1 PCH I I I CAPACITY OF SHARED LANE � 1256. 310. RCA AVAILABLE R — ESERVE 78,' 249, PCH I 1. II DELAY & LOS, E G • .•" WWWii' WWw_W WW------_w_________ _WWW_4 WwinW }.w�iw I I LOS C VULUMES; FOR LEG C FOR LEG D L. VEHICLES PER HOUR 212. 286. W>rW__u VER �IS71 I I I I I , 1 X10 n ' U N S I N1"EF:.sEIm:-1.1 ION I:::AF'Ac I'Ty CALL:ULAT"ION FORM' ' ' `� '4-a-WAY INTERSECT I oN { If r j, al 1' i � ,, 1 , f _�.� Y r T I w�A Fr.Ia P"I I'�A L Y�,r`1 „ �'�I I.r«Flf. 4�1 C.1 E>=L,k:! I NTEF�:SEI�:T I ON d'' FIAL.1._ BLVD AND OAFt:: ST .: , ALTERNATE: EXIST 1'N' METRO SIZE: 2 i q 0 i0 ' Tt) 100p 000 :I • J COUNT: = l PEA : TYPE OF rONTR OL_n TOP ' C LOCATION FILAN , AF F"'F:OAC H CODES F' 1 F A 13 4 4 i I' .ri Iw.:ANLw, 1 1 3 4 GRADE= .0% 1 A I t �i 1 1 Iw �l ._ ww t }C' 1 1 d ti.J , A B �� pry E`r r d 1 I.:IRADr/a, ! GRADE .0% 1 f b'., « y'wW 7-.. „ 85 r C , FT w TF:I 1-..:1*ED S I'H'r r:ODE I O 1 • MINOR STREE"r ADJUSTMENTS — '` l Aw C EJ_ERA1 ION (.,,,AE? NO ' ' CURB RADIUS OR TURN ANGLE? NO I : {`rti+ WN w_wll W........ Mw,wr r r ra raa r»,raf waN 4 rw.w»Wfl wN YN,»al rif la_J rw Mar r»_r rr waN fra w Waa wr rN,r.f la,r.aa.a rW a.a.a L.r, arr,wr Wr rL1_ wN w ww w wr Nw r f ,.ar.,aaa aaaar_r wi,rN ra.rr w.l rN f..L rw r,w....rN 1 , /a 1 y �i 1 A 1`'174'f. I A 1 Irf t } 1w � rr ' � f..,f uaa.wNf w.f Iwa ar..rw u.af.w.rw»«f rf wr 4r rr Nr w_1.:.1 w1 fHN.ra WH rNl Nw rN rw f.N wr awl rN wU».._...W w»»•wr,rr.Mr w1f rr f.u.rr Nn4 N,r Ww r_I wN fr rN wr rw w »wll rw w fa'rfl u r..rr r.J w NLf fifaf w rl•w..... NN«»Jur {i ,. 1 MOVE I AL 1 AT 1 Ar: 1 BL 1 BT 1 B A R 1 r...1.. 1 I »r 1 c..:1-: I ' DL 1 ' D T I DR I AI^ 1 J O L I �:1 1 4411 M 7 1 351 486 ! 301 20 t 361 :7 I 301 22 I 62, i 1 Ir"Ir'NI H t w1' 1 1 1 819 1 1 1 a"; wt■ I .r... e:a t • Y 0 1 1071 3;J t! r: 4 I , 681 ' • {+}t. 1 INI.ANES 1 1 1 I I 1 ��I wW i,{a{Na»'li•_»+,wN Nw rN Nw/Nw Nw rw wu wN uw llw NW Wr WN rr wr r W Wr rr«rN Mr Ha+fwr Naw N_irN y W flw NN Nw_w NW pW w�wr rr IJw r..r r_ur n.ar Mw ur WL rW t4N N rr»r W_wr Hr'wr rr a.r.NN wr Wr rr rr ww rr r_ __1{w ' ' � �. ;:O�� . 0 �T � ; � W�� � � `P - �� �� ��L . J H � OR I-I"I CAL. GAF' rr 7'I'8 w. 5.. 0 5;, 0 SEC S POTENTIAL CAPACITY — iH 1 - 740. 71,1 'I:;:I-I • DEMAND •»» 107 6 PC1-1 I I::APAC I TY USED .t.. 14.46 0 9.566 /n' IMPEDANCE FACTOR = r S'J8 p 98 SHARED LANE — SEE STEP , =�H' NO SHARED LANE — RESERVE 0 a 1 LOS r_ N/A �', rN Nau i..N a4.I Nl.Lw IW Nw�Wia r.NW,1WrwN.wi rNl ry NW fWJ WM NW W4_W„+fwu,.iN_wN».a.l f awa wrrr wry:«L:rNa:ar»Ila wai rw Nr wrW Wr rf wr r!»Wr»WrW'_w wrf.wrw WN».aaW»ufy r4 NWlr.f NW LW a.:..NL.4hi WK'H.Ia LW W:«WN wir f.l"l.r«4NN_H Lr4w•" AL r1 ' 2 - LEF1 TURNS FROM 3/A BL C ONFL I C T I NG EL0WE � NH r 4S i 51 F . YP1-1 CRITICAL. SAP w TS = ' 4, 5 ' 4.'5 SECS Y POTENTIAL CAPACITY ~ m.: r l 814'tl 791 m PCH i DEMAND CAP AIw � Y USED ^ 1 1 PCH i , " y „ » f IMPEDANCE 'FACTOR .'968: '`�' t' AVAILABLE .E8ERVE ,L 775 u' 779 h I*I ,,`; DELAY 4, LOS = ' A: : A 1 '� 1• 1 , K`J r,. 17, • � �. ......... »_.....,,.......,...W.,,.r_..,.....,.,.,_.•....,...W.,W...,....... ,__,,.r .."_.......,..,, ,.,«,.,~..,,.....,...., « __.._«.._"...» ..,.,_",«w.w.r.,..w_.. .,...a«....,.._....��.r.r..,._».«..."rw.r......." _..._..__ �' • [. STEP 3 TH-Ih::LJ MOVEMENT E,ROM C/D Ci" DT } I CONFLICTING FFLOWS ".. M7 = ' 1027.' i 03 i. VF'H ? c 1•'::I-r A'c: L,w GAP = TG' = ' ' ',i n s.) , ' 505 SECS POTENTIAL CAPACITY � � s � �1 J r � J . PCH 804. PC H i'i ' = D h : D TG 1 ": Nr = 7w - y DEMAND :" 4 24 ,r_1..1 ''. CAPACITY USED 12. 50 7 58 X 1jjj` NO SHARED D 1.w:ANL:w w AVAILABLE RESERVE= i , PCH L1a : N/A N/A' : . I SHARED, LANE WITH LEFT I TURN .. SEE . "T EF $ , 2 ' SHARED LANE I DEMAN1 = 0 0 P,cH�4 ' • �, • , POTENTIAL t '�;F'Ac ,I TY M 0. 0. PCH 4 A,VA:I:L.ABI,Lh., RESERVE'Vh ' p n 0, F'C:H 1 ' DELAY °r° 'LOS , , N/A 1,1/A 'fi ..w._.r....W«w,Ur.._.r,._.w.W.r,a«......,..,.r.,......•�...«.«"«.„r......r," r«r..W. w... ...aw..W�..,,w,+ur,.r. ...w«..,.. ........ ...~.,W..."......r,«..w r..W,. „Wni.:+N-..r..Nl,.r".«..u•w.»,."w.......,«n.»..,....... + . E Te:.P 4 ..,: LEFT TU N F"P^OM C/D CL DL CcNrL..ICT':CN ..�� :-L",OWS 1H,:l .., . 141. 1, ' ' ' ' 1168. VPI_H ; CRITICAL GAP` „1"ice r� u I 5.5 iii:^1_, > ,L , ' POT=NT I AL C APAC I TY MN � ' .5O 1 J Ua q PCH H f 1 I 1 NO .SHARED LANE DEMAND AVAILABLE RESERVE,;, =• 1 H ,O p 'r 1. PCH ' I l, , „WITH t 5C r� .c ' IL: '' ' ' ' SHARED LANE DEMAND,' =H '. , , , tOt „„t, '-',. ''',, '1 t' '' 0 rick ' 1,, : CAP Aiw,:C TY OF SHARED LANE = I i. ' 0, ' I-CH t'',!!, • AVAI I LASLE RESERVE .= I 0. I ' ' : 0, PCH DELAY :o, LOS .1,1/A ' N/A I WITH , I I W I I SHA ,ED 'LANE 'DEMAND = 1 'r) ' ' 1 12w: PCH . . ;,,..ti. i::AF'Ac I TY Or OHA►r' :D�'„ LAN ' 488„ I ;77,a Pi::1•�I • .�� :„ I ' ' AVA.1:1,,AE LL RESERVEI; .. : ' '1! u:;' 4,;, 2252. PCH 1� � � � � 111 . r - . WIUw-..,.U..,- rW..rr.,WYI�...W.„,„„-.,.., ...,...,,,,,WJ,•.,Y.._i+"..-,«.......,„,i,-,',.Lw IW—.—,«.i.ww'M,.-,' ,..:Y_Ww Ur W_UN N.i W.U..Ww+_ M.W MU. .. rF wJ VOLUMES I LOS I�� FOR LEO C FOR L58 D ,, • I I VEHICLES PE ; HtJ�,1r! u ' ^r �� '2S2' • WuW."....WI:_.,,."w"..•._.«...usww.dy_.,.:..`:.«u:,..,,_,,„.,..,....W.,,W.."......„„, Mww —„,.ul«ix.,,„..:.w....,— l»u..... W1.....w1..JU.i.,.wW.:W.,.....uW—....t.m.....J w..,...u.:1..,......M...:....--...u..w.«.„.......�.....,., 1' V15.: /87 1, I I I I I a I a: t I I. „ + A1, `'1\, a d1' • •.1 f1 rl"r_1t b T / H•Jf "0 % Ef7L" T Hod 4T Hod M";r 4~:7.1:38 0 "�' ,�r „� HdA '60z rw,wHH„ »r 14 . 1 r _ 1 !HOT,. 1$Z IMF 1 UZ ! 9h 1 � a i wL a i r1 i 410 E;Qm1 >Q ?4 T l n1q - (,tiElpl /.,1.,SIG•ml J'I, "�•���m}'i '�.I 1 I -1, �-•�{..,t�r Q Nt T,,1"I El C I' 1`�1 7, A,L 4;Ivq.iv ri !Y,,q»IH!'i,; 1Lod d V E I w»I V..,:i 1 J» .*J::I HW *4' ,9MOwlw voq Kid r,l 'S N, n IJ„ M�••M rh-m»wr■'••1 wr"H,r•,wm Nr..»I+wi,ww;,r+^r,m mN M»V•W HH.,«HIH»,q Inn w W».w....,MH wW•1•»„ry^W 1•f"it W!,m My rM H••M^•�•M+.^•w 47'I "',r' tz O ',ra l► 4 1 10 iGh IT wl 0 1 m1::i M!ry•1»Aw IHn»I M.I I I,J,ww1 Mw f 1•'» :3 N 1 1 Q 'd V'H W Ora 8 1 E1.1., / ~1 J 3 = 1dO LO 1 J 3:_IN WEI:J1>i I T =1 f��wL' :�I '�� I' 1 Tq 1 J,4 ,J•.p d 5.11 ,;;I'n"EI ri 4> :„I 1 wL x; :J f"i N = SM O"1 i 'a/:J NO;u M'i4In.L 1±Ww 1»,�rr lwn l„!•,IM VIM W» •1 d a »L S M•1,•,•1'^»^•••1•,»M»»m V,W 1•••,M,1 n,w Hwl MA rH Hr,W,rw wm mw»r Hr H,»m»M»W'•mN»W H»,ry»W wM mw�nl HHS r„„M nn r,l my�}^•t»,^ T f• 1 $ ra'd`1' 1' ,; 1 "1 I Ff tr", 1 ' 1 G 1M• i 1-104' 1 1 �-y I i'1r�;P I t'��+ I I 1 "� I.t S,IM I,, �I }} 1 0 !'G l f 1 I »il E 1 1 f• I 1.Q L' 1 li•t; 1''' 10 f 1 1 '4'2:18 1 . :48 I 18 1 'a.1V 1 1.V i M'I'A i =16 ON m n m Iww wm r»,•H I•,•,s »r{H,1 Hlw!w^HM Hr•rl.r„r Iml»r»m m r rw „M r Hr Hr wM Hr Mw wr H•^•ww Iw»Hr Hm,ww Im<•A„. ^r Hr••ttl•,W r»»m HM 11 im»M Mt,wr fww m•,••,ss„•i,,,,,,..,Hm�,,,s Nr ww'Iww I„y HIH ON NO pc1.1.ay . ono ON s1N:JNJ„3nfa'd 11:»1;W1,J;;: �:�J€lNIN 1 ti d0: I »LHEi x _�; �"!~1Hlw;�l T HdiArgX 1%0" 1 dOJ$ "10ZiINU0 AO 3d,U 000 '00T OJ. 000'0Z N 2IZ 10 CJ:.JwL 14 A13 30M >I:J I a A ,UA1VNV 0 y:l V' T 1 N V'i u r4V1 J NO T JwV001 =11:J,J V el Jw F1 N 1 J S X E 1 HvElIVNNEIITIV , wl 0 A bl0 (:IN V" 4:1 r",w1 E 7'1`NI'HI Q,��Jv i aH :A1 10 No 1_L::: SZJ ,LN T AVM- ;l N:JCa J NOT 1 'N'1M Ji0 ,t L r:,b1,dVO NO 1 J:tIE;J-1J_N I U I L I I r°N I T,:JNfwi wNww.xNl.W wn ww xN.wx w« w...iw.l{ww......�.w..w..«,uw.xx . .»Wr WNwN Nw...,, .N• x• .WUw ,xw rW wu ww wN ww w..ww w..wr ww www .r wwrw ww rr..rw wM .wr.r.wN r«r«rw rw . STEP 3 _rHRU MOVEMENT_ FROM ►,:/z CT DT CONFLICTING FLOWS MT ,w. 5t..8 n 1{ w VPH, CRITICAL GAP N= TO ww 5. 3 5.5 SECS POTENTIAL CAPACITY ..r MN3 = 5751. 573. PCH . . IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT = M r•52 ,50 PCH i'1�� d tJ...la�u „ DEMAND = 17 23 F'CH1 ) CAPACITY USED wN .;, . .314 M S 6 4.01 .,%t! e : IMPEDANCE FACTOR = P8 = .981 81 .9! 4 ~ NO r i AVAILABLE RESERVE 0. 0. Pc*•i' DELAY & LOS N/A N/A SHARED LANE WITH LEFT TURN -w SEE STEP 4 ,, SHARED LANE DEMAND�� -= 0 0 PCH POTENTIAL CAPACITY = M13 = 01. 0. P::HMI AVAILABLE wSwr L r 0. 0. PCH DELAY ;/ LOS = N/A N/A a ww«rW».{.{.r Wr.r.N«w«w». w4 ww N«NNW.w�« ..r wr.»w rW NW.•w www Nr N.i wNf.N,w ww{... ,{«. .....Ir..�..�wN NW INN»r 4w wN«Wwl..w,w»W«ww«.«rw«w NW 4w Nr....rww+«rr4,a4..Wx.N4 wW,..«r.....tNN«r... ' i STEP 4 - LEF"I TURN FROM C/D CL DL. coN Lw I CT I Na FLOW 3 = MH = 594. 600. VPH CRITICAL GAF' Ti �-° 5 5.5� SECS POTENTIAL CAPACITY = MN ... 550. 546. PCH ADJUST IMPEDANCE: 50 p a03. PCH , I ' SHARED LANE D EMAND 0 PCH I AVAILABLE RESERVE ' .{ O. 0. PCH DELAY & LOS = N/A N/A I WITH LE1 T & THRL,M . iii 1 .w« PCH 1 1 SHARED LIAh�r«, DEMAND �- 0 �� �� CAPACITY CE SHARED LANE = 0» 0. PCH RESERVE ,�-" 0. 0. PCH AVAILABLE is DELAY LOS N/A N/A�� l ' ' 1 G r"rl H L»i+~FT; THS r.l..�, N, RIGHT _ SH ARED rAhE DEMAND = 4w PCH 11.CAPACITY OF SHARED LANE 719. 610. Pr.H �.. AVAILABLE RESERVE = 673. 552. PCH , A F'I LOS �" A � l c,,,-••... ..1:4.»i,w N•••4W NI«Nw{..«' r WN 0 N S. FOR LEG C `iP LEG L' LOS� �w{ VOLUMES: W VEHICLES PER I`HOUR 2 210, Y...„, W 1....3'AM 44.WNuui,.Lw.....ww«w.......4 wN 4W{WNrw.N---.,WN4.NrN.I.N4W ■N W.».,Nw1...{4..4.r.i.w.14W w«44 rN...... .«N..w,4L«WI.,L.4--..*m«{.w14 -Lx wN w..N uM.w- »N......Nwwiw.'r«,"1„1....,x„r*N,N+•M,...+.. [ , I ' r d . n • • ■ • • • ,y • 1 y'r u.o-•:.0y. l�i. ion. ED .. .",:'.:1:.::.;::::: •"-...4.-i,- 'F-4.1i'ik.....:.:.. . .. tw,,, , ............., ..;.6....,.,.:::... .,....,..... r...ii... ..,...:::...:. 1 , . . , ,,,,,,.,,,,,................:::::. :-,:-...: 1 r.. ,. :..:: . INEERING & . A \. NING (ATEp ) . . 1,...,..4 .....,,,,.. .-, " ow . ..:...w r r ,, f • • LI P rQQsp. ��j.�(f�'�� �a/y({y{J��.,//�+�y� l�J�A�• T /�//y��\ Q [u, iii 1 .:✓....,.�:.--+a,�a-....�.u.,.M...�..v......,.a.,.r.+.+,w�.... -..:..L,..J::.......�.a:.:.J'......�.r._��,«.�».,.k..�. _,.- ,..,.,.,� ..,,. I ._..,.,.,..,.,.a«.:».,.+..+.++e'......wuk..�ww�r:l.�,».- _ � r • PROJECT: TRAMMELL CROW 'DATA'.;. 8Q1°-hl%tr',~-8' ' 4 1,4,,, ' LAND' USE 10 • TYPE P OF LAND 11 USE GENERAL,ERAL" OFFICE x!M ', TIME PER I OD,p ' AM PEAK VALUE of X 1 25 ' ` AL_U of A r. �,� . VALUE. of B 1 .4 • f'ASSBY % = 0. f1t % ',` %IN o'7. (Zl%. ' •. l OUT 1wpiu . ' ' IL' ' LnN(T,) ' = 5 u 49284' PASS DY NEW TR I P ' "f `1"Al� TRIPS 0 2 VEhr�7 f�,L.. N = ` 1 I 0 `11 +: a ., , ,.,, ,,,.,.... . ,.,..:,. ,..,. ,. .., ,.,,.,.. ., ,: . .,,, .,:, ,,..,..,.,. . ..:, , ,.,. . . ...., : ... . 1 1; , . . „ , , . . . l',, ' 1 ''''.' 7' , i il—: , . . , , it_ . . I f'. j. 1„.. , f, . � . n �i . r ,n , r • 4 A a r "'. TRIP GENERATION BY EQUATIONS LISTED IN 4TH EDITION EQUATIONS WITH LOGO I PROJECT: TRAMMELL. CRO f DATE: 0--Mar-- 89 . , LAND USE # 710 1 ,., TYPE OF LAND USE GENERAL OFFICE TIME P'ER I OD a WEEKDAY , VALUE OF X . 125 a . . VALUE OF A = 0. 75 a VALUE OF F = 3. 77 r'Y' r/n I 1J 5I/t�14f MY 11 �y d�rr yy��yy. 9,, x OUT Sob 00% , EQUATION 1 I_Nt:T:a A(LN(X) ) 1- 1 „ L.hI .T.i --- 7. "3S1. .;:.3,� PASS Y NEW TR I F'S r., • TOTAL TRIPS 162;? 0 1622 . °,: VEHICLE I N = s i t 0 e 1: i VEHICLES OUT = 811 0 811 , � 1. 1 ■ 6 ■ I �' .. � '. 1. ■ I I i 1 I u. li . r ;,.,...,.. ns.,i ..I,,1...............n....i ... ... . i 1 a ',.::11',:',''') 4 n n • ,k • ,I.._.a,.s..,.a....,,,..«....,,.._..,<.. .,-. _- '..,.�..-W.,....A.. , .....:..w_x w,....,n iau-.,.u,_..�..u.,...,...•...,,...,...,..w. ,.,.ww,I.,a..�.M,:4..«................Iw„. „- ._-. , „ ,. ,- ,,,.. - 1,J • I TRIP GENERATION BY EQUATIONS LISTED IN 4TH EDITION EQUATIONS WITH La G . PROJECT: TFAMMELL CF a4 DATE: 30—Mar—89 j , LAND USE # TYPE OF LAND USE' GENERAL OFFICE i TIME PERIOD: PM PEAK VALUE OF X = 125 , . . VALUE OF A = 0, 83 VALUE OF B 1 . 46 PASS '{Y %' • ._ 0,:00% % OUT 84 n 00J"/ • EQUATION 1 LN CT) 1 A(L»Irk f(X) ;y + B i LM(T) 1 »r. 5.46171500 PASS BY NEW TRIPS VEHICLE 4 µ- ry VEHICLES OUT' = 19' ' 0 19S . 1 1 , I i 1 I x 1:',4 , 1 , 1 i I n 1 [4. 1 'I a I I 1 t I III y_ i il. a fi, 1 a ,1141• ., G= I + I I, I 1, I I I ' ` i 1 I I I ry f. ._ .,... ., .' 1'v,i., -ev ,'... v.i,,.V I... �.,..... •v.. ...., ... .......r..v.v.r. vuv.•I.n.w.. ...... .,vv. .r, ..., (.n,l,.. ,.. v., �... .... ,....•. .s. .. ..v...r rx. ...• v v,,,.. „ Y rI, . , . . . . , •. • „ . . —... . I / , . . , . , ■ 1 ■•■'' ., ' , • • , .. ,•• • . r....1 . , . , 1 ' • H . . • I . i . . . . , . • ... ill.r4 AIIIIIW/Ato. • 1101.10MIMINI , . , ..... . ,... . .............:. .. ..... •:•:•:•:•: A , `....., A wue,,,mil A s . . -,.,..j., ............ .:..__.,:, ''''''..:°:......:i....:::'..::: MIP',' i're \ PO R-1 fs,....\\T I 0 \\I :.:.:...:, . , ..,,,...,....... •,..,..„. = ...........:.::::.::: :-....:F , 4 .,. G I \ E E R I N G 8LI ki,66,......4%. .11/4 V ••••r+ms:rd, ... , t' ''•',''.,,,,,wv... ........, ta.alliii:,,, , •‘'' ::•:. ',...,,'---..: I ** ;... -- 1 :11 ' ,,,u1-"•••••• M Lk,II/', 1 i i:ir.a'/.,e/ . to 26:e4'7'-"-- rm . I , , . 1 , . • . . . •:, , . li APPENDIX . . , . . • . . . . . . . , LEVELS . . . ', ', 1 ' : hill! • . . , 1. IL, , ., • . • ■ . . ■ . 1 1 , 1 SERVICE GALCULATIONS , 1 1 . ' . . , . . . • . ' „ . . , . , . , . . , • . . 1 . , , • , I . g . c, , 4%01111'1h. • '',ribs • . , • . A4 ..��_.r, .�..r._-i x, .,. Ivv.,........h.w.L..., ..,d.rin•,.rwrv.. . ., it , . ., .. ix,. ,.r..w..iw..a.,A..r4..w-rt .H - --SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION --SIGCAP-- VERS(21jan87) INTERSECTION; TIGARD GREENDURG AND MAPLELEAF •. VOLUMES; TOTAL TRAFFIC AM PEAK °, .,i. METRO SIZE: 20,000 TO 100,000 ANALYST; DICK WOELK !PHASE !PHASE ! !PHASE ! - = - • � .PHASE PHASE ,PHA E .PHASE, , O 120 G 104 Y° 16. ! ! � ! ************************, ��. ► ! ! ! ! * SERVICE LEVEL A J I ! ! ! ! ! ! ! if SATURATION 48% * E; 1► � ! ! ! ! **** **u****** ******** APPROACH LANE GEOMETRY 1 • . ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST . t LANE ! MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH ? I ! RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 R.. 12.0 RTL' 12.0 ! .'' 2 ! LT, 12.0 T.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 L. 12.0 3 �! L 12.0 L. 12.0 LT. 12.0 ,0 • ! MOVEMENT VOLUMES ! MOVE SATURATION ! MOVEMENT LOS pv APPR ! LT' TH ,T� P TOT ! LT TH RT ' LT TH RT • SOUTH ! 9 342 162 599 ! 21% 48% 48% ! A A A s . NORTH ! 46 381 10 437 ! 22% 48% 48% ! A A A • WEST ! 5 15 35 55 ! 21% 21% I8% ! A A A ! ° EAST ! 55 5 6 66 ! 26% 26% 26% ! A A A ! APPR! IRKS! !X-WLK!PEDS? NO! ! PHASING S !12.0Y.! ! S ! ! ! N ! 2.0%!` ! N ! !N/S-DIRECTION SEPARATION (C-4)! W ! 2.01! ! W ! - ! !E/W-DIRECTION SEPARATION (C-4)! D. ! 40%! ! E ! ! ! APPROACH V/C VALUES ! MOVE ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST LTR` !' .1109 .0000 .0000 .0153 I TR ! .1400 .1086 .0000 .0061 ! LT ! .0805 .0000 .0111 .0167 R ! 0900 .0056 .0108 .0033 R .0000 .0000 .0074 .0000 ! ; T r .0 950 .1 58 ►0083 0 .0028 L , .0803 .0284 .0029 ,0176 ! ! LEG VOLUME ! ! TIME AVAIL (SECS)! MOVE STORAGE ! ' LEG I AT LOS ! APPR {{! LT TN RT ! LT TH RT ! „ rW�wl'�!.I '4LL.w I -LLw4iihri)-ti1i'wirLlJ wi Y.}Nr1.Li �-Mr,wi�--{N.--y L�r:r M i SOUTH SOUTH"! 41.S 41.8 41 !,*t* 0* 0 NORTH ! 0 ! NORTH 132.4 32.4 32.4 ! 56 238 0 ! !' WEST ! 0 !. WEST ! '14.9 14.9 56.7 ! 0 29 15 ! EAST ! 0 ! EAST + 14.9 14.9 14.9 ! * ** 0 ! .** . _ CALCULATE MANUALLY A i..fi.i..w.+.+.-•t..+.«.A„' ..�_...5 .���... � �..�.�- .t:[w�.a..l u.«,.nl Mr«.-...«+u...-k...,•w r.'e.�,e.. • _�•. - ,...w .x[-«.-.YC�#br1.+An-rutrv.nt. a e .. I. • . . ',, w - I 3NAL I Z ED INTERSECTION w rsI Gc AF-•r« vEF,s(21.jEir►X37) • INTERSECTION: T I GARD REC NL R' AND MAF _EL EA� " VOLUMES N TOTAL TRAFFIC FM P E A K 'METRO SIZE 20>2( 0 TO 100, 000 ANALYST: DICK ar%, WOELrk.. !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !F'HASE !PHASE ! 0= i' 74 . 1 NWnw..»,,...,_ r .1 ..r r«« I w „•� I Mr..M .rw» I ww .»r»ww». I .nw.IMr«wwrr»W 1 r ! t t ! ! #Mfr## 4�'## ##�4#lC #######a4 I 1I ( I ! I # �� t I I � t t � ! * i ! SERVICE LEVEL. E *. ! ! ! , ! t. * SATURATION 94Y. ' *• t ! I I t ! ! . •� i,'11.w"r.r.. ... ..... I M" » .r......"»Kr t «w-NMw..«h t wMnw«.»Nw ! 1.W..rr.w»wrWr, t V.r-I-«rM«r ! ****.n y�7.!y y y. y S. * {� �y�[,'{J U,�/ t •r I. 17��YYS'•7�»•715•T.w 7i' #•Yi•�i�3'i''•�C�IFC 7%•Yi•Y.'75 tY; ! � APPROACH LNEGEOMETRY SOUTH NORTH wr w !WL CA1 , A N E ! „ MOVE M O r E W I ID1 IN" MOVE W I X 1 H . MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH ! ,. LANE rw_rN.. ' ».r..:w 1...•Mr wr...».««r - .w w W wNr w W »«.»Lr r r w« ,N.rW rw.NN.»« » --..».-,- w,.r« w»W» Mr.w.0_ �. w r.MN«.» r t , . ; J. 2.0 R 1 . i260 R .J:x r 11 2 ! LTtl' 126 T. . , tl 0 Rb a ' 12.0 1-6.6 12. 0 1e ■ 0 ! r . , 3 ! _tl . 1 4 '. 0 Lp:U 12. 0 LT, . � N tl p C ( ( I;, " tl MC1VI ME,N"IN V(JLrUI t S ! NONE SATURATION ! MOVEML NT L_O ! APF'Fa. ! L T • TH F;T TO1,/ ! LT" Tf"! F.,1`I t LT TH RT 7 ! 1 , n r r 1....«r»•wx..r • • • ,• SOUTH ! SO2 4J µ �1 1� ,u ! J4% , � rt 94% I E E E i NORTH ! 3$ 694 28 ,:57 ! ,' 23% 94% 94% . A E 5 WEST ! 3 4 4. 4' J. 5 5 ! •..,"--y 8 94, I A A E i . • EAST I 78+ 25 ' i ' 885 1�>:.% ' 1`,�'tl 2'1`l% ! E A A ! ,' ' APPR! TF :s,! i X-WLK!FEDS? ' ,NO ! t PHASING t n 5,0% !«.» . Y N t 5. 0/ . . ' h I � � ,h/ � �1* �rT I �� ��-AA" I �C tw » � � ! ! ���, W ! ie 0%! ,'. ,1, W I I I t E/W »DIFF °TIoN SEPARATION tc-4 y I � t , , . LI :c...„..' , .! , 56C l !' : ! L=: I' �N.Nr w I• t ' , ! 1; t APPROACH Vi C, V A L G E " MOVE ! SOUTH NORTH WEST ' EAST ! i LL:,1 Mw rM WV i.{r.•...iN.1'r..ii N..1 r,.,,n.i 1.N1 f.1.1 r:M).Nr Nri NW rl,1Nif«M ...rNr,,.1.....,«1....rN"r...» ..N..1 ti.L»,_W 1.inr{Y..w.,W".«NN N.N.r..0....,,nY...N I..:r w.'w" t I • LT ; ! . 1 BE t �;h, h� TE , i 41�'S '•''( ( i ' . 0 »0422 i �. I 0 60244 I k t ,.. ��>a � r, ty, qq .�y�: � rwt h --?DJ! �_1��NI a 7y t 1JJ1 q ����6 ! L, I ' LI 1,' " '. 1003 ' .0'20 01 g$ 25.1 t . . . ' LE VOLUME , ! TIME AVAIL �.I. � �; 1 E r W; 1) I MOVE STORAGE , L,.: ( w I A L,08 ! A1 r1 ! ,L,T TH rei , LT TH RI ! wN.wWU M»u.r;.N„j,w,wM,..iy p.«u"�uNl{NN w..a.ql Yw M•r wq I My.a».... Wu wruw i(.Ma.uN..�Mn N"FI+d,«"r"'u..e hw t..0 w,MU NW«w 4k1 wN 4N,(µN"NU�a 4a.wr"".uw i'`, S. UTH ' ! ' ' 0 '' ',HI ' SOUTH i 1 S u+�,., 1.E ie ∎'``.t t8,,'$ i ..** *** 0 r„i NORTH I 0 ! NORTH ! ' � 1.J. 1965 i+.1 6 5 i 8� 3°t4 0 ! : WEST ! I 0 t WEST ! 1148 30.0 , 0 48 204 ! ,, . a t EAST ! 0 ! „ EAST I 24. 5 24.5 24.6$ i *** *** 0 ! I I, **• ' is AL CULATf . MANUALLY I I �. . , , , ,..,, , , r 4 J r ....,:�,�..r+a.......,:I...'....... _ „ .... �'.r. ..,._rl.-.r..lar...r..l....n'_...,+.wr..-..,....�... ✓..... - . . . . , , .. . . . , . . , . . E. .--S I GNAL 17 ED I NTERSECM:T I ON --s I►:�c. FI--- VEF:B( �..�i-riB�7:� '. . „, , I i�1 T E F�:8i: 1�:"r I C�l l�v "r.I►";A h:S� '►a r:L:..E ha.�L-�tw►r:►:a AND MA F1l..C h.t=A F . i 1YOL,1JMEG p H ' TOTAL TRAFF I I:: pm F'EE h�:: :METRO SIZE: , 10Q,Q)O TC� �E OL, 000 : ANALY T a ' �D I C:H�; wn'.:LH: ' y 1 , 1 1 F�I�A�1�.�w . !':': !E_!PHASE.w . F MIA,SE i��lA. C F h�A,rE 1. ! 1. ` r 1 1 '',! ' 1 : ' A : 1 1 *************************'**'**** ! 1 I 1 1 i i .. # ! • BEF.,, IC:C; LEVEL D--li * ! ! , � ! ! ! � ! ! .* .SATIw,lRAT I pN 89% * . : ' • 1 ! . ! ! I 1' 1 # H I 11 r 1 r.. .. ! rW... .Hw I .rw—..... _1''"'"'""'!'—'—'—''."7 1 .... I *****.?F #f r****. ;3;*r ***•Sf••:**** AFIF�ROACH LANE' GEOMETRY 1 I ` ! ' SOUTH" Vr ' WEST' EA(13 ! ' ' LANE 1 MO,V + WI D Ira MOVE WIDTH I"OVE W I tTH 1 MOV 6I TTN I .rr��.W 0', ( v ' I : .! F: 1`11 i.1:1. 0 RT a 12 n�0 1'0. q „{�r.4::7l t 1''.T,L. 12a ! r 1,..„, +�; ! ' 'L T 1 ip, •1 �( 'r ' r: r i 2 .0' ' i ' 12 o ! ' . .1iL M .1y d...b 'M'a .1y 1... ���y!i' `ky a ..i.q'1� ..f M a .1:y a . 3 ! 1 L.r'. 1.: . t; L M .n 1 1.L..h 0 ..'1" . . 1.4.a,4G, M,a q . ,. o ! • ! : MOVEMENT ,V(."LUML.8 , ! ' MOVE SATURATION, 1! :..MOVEMENT LOS ! . AF'F1 ; , ! . LT TH RT TOT ! LT TH P:`r ! LT.. TH RT .'! . ' - I, «.a.W..w.. I .W . ...—....... .W..........w .....W'.. .__._..._.r.. 1 ......r —.. ... ... ..,W..r,...... 1 ...f.r. . _..1. .: i "�u ! rx.lU:1a•�' .�4:1J::. a:.i .1.0:1 5 ! 89% 8 %' „• � 8.9% 1 Uw.., 'wr 1)—E, .....D—E 1 ' NORTH 1 :t 894 , 28 7 7I 21% ,� 8 9r, 1 ri j ��..:C ...' i I W. . M . •1'. IW 1 1 r ! �1 EA 9T ! 789 x 5'18r 5 ! 8' r ' 26% 26"ra ! . I A A 1... 'J AFFR 1 I TRKS! ! -WLN ! EEDS? NO ! FHAS I h117 W ! 1 .....,.r,.....wr..w.......+... .... ..... w.... .w W..Y-. ,,J..+..........J.y..... '1' ( I. I•! �M{ .H..F. 0 r ! 1 i E3 n ° I. i tr 'fp,°� ! ! N� I . ._ f !N l S D'd. E(.+ { ION SFF�At AT I N (C—P�) I. r a 4G! a . ,w W r� . . W ! '540% ! ! J ! _ ! ' ! E/W--0 I F E,OTI ON 'SEF'AF AT I C1h•! .(C--4.)'! 1 ' '' I . 1yyy ��,.r/p� F W 1 e W 11'0 ra' rw. , , ! AF`PRCIACH Vr 1u VALUE ! ' 1 i' 'MOVE ! 'SOUTH NORTH : WT LAST ' ! ;r L TI: ! . 1880 . 0000 .000m :w_'�•10 ! J. ,r 1 ~ I '. J 'C q : „0 C .O O l . w rr j • 1 Li" ! , 104i .000o �.02-1' .+.:..,.C.,t ! ! r: ! .011.7 ,O156 . 1.teai '' . 0:2`8 ! ' ' ' r 1•4';',' .-AD .,1r 1 4 ! .00G � ,��C7a1(� 1– 1� p 00C� J ! . , y�.{���y; 1 T' ! . 1367 ' „ .''i'�'28 I . :.,Y.058 , ..0 i 3'J - ' L ! . 160^ ,0201' . . 01� 5 . �e�'51.1� 1 ' . i !1 LE': VoLUMr:: ! ! 'TIME AVAIL . (;8.,.CS' ! ' M 1VE ,'STiRA► E !'' r 1 111'{appl}�1(' l...H 1fa1 ! A T 141,5,I..{ ! A P E R ! LT 'TH :1'1.r ! LT, '''TH P.t I • W..� ,_............_ ! .............,,..,..,......._..., 1. SOUTH ! :,w'11., 5' ! 8C1UTH ! 2 «'7 ,,':v. 7 ' 257.,. 1.'....:*** , ***"'. -'; t , ! . Ncrr!TH ! ' 1, 1'00 ' ! ' ' NDItTH ! 27.44 27,u 41 27>;4 ! ' 45 ' 4 64 ','6 ! 1 , . , WE8T, ! 89.9 1 ' I WEST I i 6 3 i 8 h 3 42,; i. 1 0 83 28(.; ! . EAT ! .788' I A T , ! 34E 84,5 2445 ! **'*I *4 * 0 f ' ' �AW1.. I I�A. E MANUALLY I .xr r r I k. .r r. I I ,,,..,. ..., .... ..r....n..rnv.rnr. r.. . n. v r.,.� r+M yr ., ,....n ..v..�,,.,,... ,.,r 'I r + . r r ' .w r u Qr{% A h. . • , I x.�lu:..v`...,.�..•..�«..«,._.,k+.............�.,. ,,, __..� ..J Ya..� ��. �......I..Aw.:.,fr.... ,. ......... ..._. _.,. _. .,... .a.nu.,_..rvu+•.-.�.o....k.l w,'e{,uv...+, -,. • 1 INTERSECTION w,•...-� „'1 wl wN.w tt"� '�1 C a --SIGNALIZED S I►3Ir;Ar VEF:S t 2 i.rjanO7:� 6y INTERSECTION: TI GARD GRE:F`NX IJRG AND HWY 217 NRAMP VOLUMES: TOTAL TRAFFIC AM PEAK METRO SIZE: 20 y 000 0 TO :100 p 000 ANALYST: DICK WOEL.K .. � !PHASE ! PHASE HASf ! PHASE ! PHA SE ! PHASE ! r-N�AOEI ! C= 90 I�= •78 ��w 12 ! 'r: .w•w« 1 F.u. wF wr 1 r.{rlw «.,w«« .w._ —Nwr.wrx / rwrw rw W{w4 1 _ ,x..r• ! ' ! 1 ! II I ! I ! *****•#f**•�**•***1*•********* ", , k I 1 i 1 I I I I I 1 I ! I. ! ! I ! * SE1T V I I::E LEVEL. C * C • ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 * SATURATION NI O% * L: I 1 1 r 1•..w„N•rw.N« ! _.-. 1• 1 w«r:l ! • wl 1 ----«.. ww• 1 r.l-« ww ! ***•*,* *.•fir*. •.*•******, E•*.x••*1** 0 t I I I APPROACH wH rA L GEOMETRY r \'''' WEST Lr A,N}T 1, LANE MOVE WIDTH rrlO 4 L: WIDTH 1101L WIDTH MOVE WIDTH wNxw WNx.N««I i ww N —— Wrrw :«» aN w « _-ww •« w rw .w ww .w ..._ ww N _ r.•wF W wxw.4 Iwl www -.... 1 1 1 T 1. :i 0 " 1.-,'0 0 0 r 10 0 ! . « {n n 12. 0 t u ` J tl 0 n'n n n ry LT. L. n ! .„! n oh „ 0 n M 11 2d 0 pq Y v0 d a i n 0 I. I MOVEMENT �OLL �E� MOVE SATURATION MOVEMENT r a LOS ! N5 � �1 �1 1•rl � " xN w N w u • I AP PR R ! LM�r !"!°•! RT TOT ! L T. ! t- 11 r ! L r !"i•r!, RT ! :w xw«w wF«w rN11 I Yw»w «w rM rW wN Nw .r«•r«•«r.rw wl•«..4w W{•W.r WII w«WI rM I w4 rW wl W.wr r.W Wr rNl rr 4 MF N •1 «I f «M•••w N 4N1 wN rM rw. {..••W1 w•r•.{" i r . 1 w r«.••w W.{w Y i I • n SOUTH I 482 444 0 926 I 68%, 62% 0% I (wl IN✓ n tl tl ! NORTH ! 0 ' 326 119 4 4 5 . 0% 68l »` ! ! p n tl C L ! I' 4 WEST 1 0 0 0 ' 0 ! 0' r 0: f % I 4 p d I s M A b tl n 1 I wAE/.3 I 1 W 0 0 380 51 0 ! $6 1 0% 88% ! A p n it w f APP R!f TRKS! ! X N'WLK ! I'"'EDS.? NO! i, PHASING ! • " W,1—•.•4 NW 1 WN W1—W_— 1 ' f M w —..... 1 ...---__M W—w I r f Nww —_— w—w w MW — WNW w N w r rw •rW—w —wr i � ) I ' ! / N 1 Ww ! ! ' /S—DIRECTION SEPARATION tww 4) { r. W ! . 0% ! ! W ! «w-w ! !Eli'W7—DIRECTION SEPARATION ( Wl-4) 1, I • F.;''' ! •;u 0% ! ! E ! :.FrM ! I 9 '' , I 1 APPROACH /W VALUES i V MOVE I SOUTH NORTH I WEST L C ;T {. I.. Wi Ni fro 1•.LI{••..Nw i .«..N r. rr»wW.... {rN NM w.w.4 w N:.Yur WN 4:r NW:�YN.W 'FW Y.r«wr'w r.r W«Nw rr I:w w.4 F.r Nw NW YrN Ny{ ' , i 0 . 0661 a R1' -- w —ADJ! t�Y u 0000 .0000 .0000 . I528 ! 1�, - IL T ! tl 2467 n 09l 8 M 0000 0000 1 111 I �' n Y L Y 'tl•2770 60 000 .0000 .0747 ! :' • LEA VOLUME: ! ! TIME AVAIL C E CS) ! MOVE STORAGE ! I. I� E. �. _.�I�WI 1 �Ar I LOS C ! A1=iPlri I ! I Lw"r "rN RT ! LT TH RT ! ! yN ' � .W WN r.ri W«�'I INN N:wN r»Y YrY/{r.f LNNW NW y.W MN 414 f' ' M"wW�....1W.rr.w4 f wr NW w«{N I MrYwY Ww F«I N:Yx4.w.Y wNI JW NW�WN rMN YI%.:i Y..+1 rar+F•N YrrYNN..N ww NW Mr wr rr,r r.r fW N«•iW I ' 'SOUTH ! 1140 ! SOUTH ! 8968 89.8 0 ! 840 318 0 I 1 I NORTH ! r t NORTH I . 0 12. 0 1 Wd J ! 0 175 .W I WEST T ! L �18 ! WEST ! >i O I ,0 „ 0 ! 0 0 0 ! EAST 1 420 ! EAST I a» d 9 is 0 30. 7 ! 0 0 271 I 1.1 I .. _« „w.«.... ..n..r-r.,-..,. . ,. _««N.s I GNAL_17ED I 1\!"1-ER SECT I tan! ...__S I I.�I_:AF1.—N_ VEERS(:2r 1 jan87 �� r,!°!"EF;:; EIw:�..I c�ra a T I I; Ar':D I:�; : r1/4! }u :l:� AND ��WY r: n!�:ar � . • �.., VOLUMES: TOTAL_ TRAFFIC PM PEAK ' ' METRO I ZE r ,2 J, 000 TO 10.0 00 ANALYST■ DI c:i< WQELM K !PHASE HASE A PHA E ' I°PHASE . ?PHA E !PHASE !PHASE !• 172.:- 7.... = 78 • • Yr..: 12 rn ar ( I - I I r I 1 'ri.#.*.}{..{,.;{. .`Ts 7ti•Fl*"7S':°S•' .1{..:#••jc.**. #.* ! ! I I I ! ! • ' SERy I L E LEVEL E , ,. ► I t ! * SATURATION 1:1 ■/• I I 1 I 1', 1. 1 ♦ ..4/ • 1 ••«iN•.W.w««« N_ ..•MN•w• ! « • « ! "M•..« I N.Mw" Nw__«. I N•N—wN. _N.. r ******4.0*****************• I " �! ' A!,Fl:o, I:3•1 LANE !aEOME"rFW 1 ' L: ! SOUTH SOUT NOF::T 1 WES`r EAST I • LANE ' :! `MOVE' .W I D"rH MOVE 'WIDTH •: MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH ww«...._i:« r _N.«, ««« ".. _"_' «... "; u«_ ._,:"«,�':N «..M a �;.» M_»_«M»i.N_M��.w 1._N. «_« _ Mi11 »MN__N M M..»N» w_MN i_«.. .•,...".N» 1 ' i "T■ b„ 1'; ,■0 P U C 12 Y O ■ M v p 0 t r p 11 -12.0 ! 4 I. L— 12. • ( n ■i■ ♦ T,tl Y 12. 2) N ■ ! tl W , LT,,, 12. V ! q 0 "r d U 12.Y 0' ', ,u h Y ! o ,„ ,,0 ! �� ! • „ MOVEMENT YOLUI�IE5i ' ! . Mn�VE 'SATURATION ! , 'MOVEMENT LNO�3 ! ' ,�!w`!-'!T; , !•. "r Ill: Ir."� TOT ! LT! ' T!"� rT,'!' ! LT TNT ."► ! . "..«MIMNI ««i.;''r M.. MM.r«».MN« w «n« »'w"..'1 .« «..wul.». M. ,www».. .».a. ( ..w "I.._" w, a 1 E r 1 •;f tW� r.c � 71E,"� 1 ' .; ° 1 sW,s1 Y ■.+�■ I i SAN 1«N h 1 "SOUTH 1 � 2 � 5 11 . '01 �7/■ /Y 0 � ■ ■ ' 1`Of 1•II-•1 ! 0 ,1 2.!2G9 ,474 4 1 7`J, `w 1 0!h 94% r 75% ! a h h 1 C '-0 1 ,• 1' w!EW«IM ! 0 ' '01 0 ' '^ �K.J, ! (''Y•■!Y ('0Y/ � R..% Y :Y , ',p, t1 tl h tl"l,,,,, I!, ,; EAST ! 20 .'I K�J 120 f 2G;i t 5i..�rH 0% ' ' 94% I 1'2, 'h Y Y E ! . M i 1 w I ,. I s i i, l t l 1 {.i A�1-r!„, �'�.F•I,w�i . X, W L»�i:i ,r•Cy D,� �(;,1 PHASING'',A S;L!�!♦a . . 11 M 1 M j...wN M•,MN.■ 1',.....„..:,H.,—1....,-.......'.........,................L., I , , I «._M e M_—MN".N MM•»N._N_,.. i M MII N.N l.N•..N_«N.N N.N_«i.1.]«.•.N_.F•.•1 w_Nw «Nr I...i_ _e«,_N w«..• 1 ' 1 >w« VI".. i 1 I I �� 1..�d ti N ! 5>, C J! ' ! N ! -" ! !n1/.—Z.7IF:EC:TIOn! SEPAF:'A1",Ionl t`,:.,w_4.y ! 1 ■ ,�•,�„! ! �; ! -awl ! ! /1 --D : :CT ! PARATOnsC.C-4;f ! • •" � .. 1 t5„:0%! ! E I - i 1. Ai`r PcaA►_W V/C VALUES. H • hOVE � aU1"�i N * r�� W r EAST , ! . � .....»M«..i NM w..w: ..'I N...wM �,NM u.M N_..»+..:..M.M uw IMN...✓..".« .Iw :..Ni :.:: _M iMM««N..."«i•...u«.w wM_...««.._..wa 1....._..».»�..(�' � �, I k ' 0K•Jc50 i ' , .00(}0 L 1 i ! Y li' 1Ewu Y�,L.�VCJ YJ „2889 ! , , P M-AD�` !. Y 00C, 0 ; , 0t Cif .0000 Y i 0 i ! !�, ' «J 1 p 888 h'8 4 9 '0000 - ' : w 6 00t ! I. L I ! Y 1 1'78: ; 1 ' r Y Ca 0 0 Y rejE80 Y 1178 I ' , ' s , I » Mi :VOLUME ! I, I E1 AVAIL t 1 S E�,w M C« li: I I MOVE 1 T OPiAGE ! V' 1, 'f.r. ! . A r i:«.r) Iw; A-P P LN T , TI R I 'L T H C•i r . z t, .� 4,,4,..1.1 wM_..i...i. I'w..Mw 1••W«N W■■••.■NNI■•Niw M.S w»I 1 wN it,...■nM NJ.MM i.,6:4.1- --- -- - - --- -- S O U T H .. I MN-«M INN I.1r....ii N_M««.j wM Mi...«.....W.■.+ 1 1 ' i NORTH ! ''47 26!.., ! h !Cs T�{' I,� k, u w w ua 1 wl+! 411•. • ,()Jr-.,81. 1 I tTitS0 ! .W ',St ! , . 0' ,,0 !! , , . ' ► . . 0 0 , 1 EAT J I EAST I., .7`1 • .0— 50.7 1 1 :2E34 ! ! , 1 I 1 I ti . • � ..I.».,.�. r,✓.....�,-,9�..,. ..... ...,9 a�... _ ....,J..,. a_ .»a..,.M+ ,.k..�.Y`; r,a...,....-rl 4�,.. ,., a . «.a. a...-rw --SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION W I!7I::A1 V N f S t: w 1,jn87:1 • INTERSECTION: TIGARD GREENEURG AND NWY 217 NRAMP VOLUMES: TOTAL TRAFFIC PM PEAL:;; METRO SIZE: r0 q 0Q 0 TO 1 p g 000 ANALYST: DICK MK WOE ,F . i ! PHASE w.. ! PHASE !PHASE ! PHASE !PHASE ASE !PHAS ! C•= 120 G=108 Y. 12 ! «MI rN•,• {, «w.f..«••M { wrww w.r { .r« «i«ll+ I « «w.• { «/.«.wr wrw«w w« { ! *75***X75'*•***************•77;'* 1 ! { { , ! { { , . * • !' ! ! !. ! !' ! * SERVICE. LEVEL E * ! ! ! { ! ! ! * SATURATION 91% * !wl_r«,w«N —1. wa«w wN w«—.... 1 ——_—_—w 'I «•«——1 w 1 « J wN. ««.—1 ««•W«•.•• !� *. 1 ••., .. •r •J#,* x•9•�s DF ? rr1& fir# 'r hF3Si* ! APPROACH LANE GEOMETRY 1 ! SOUTH NORTH WEST PAST ! LANE ! MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH fti'LC1Vf WIDTH MO G. WIDTH ! .� rt wr uf•1"'l f rrl«1 ! «.••w•N T«tI«M U « «wl W 1•:• L,�lN w/yyr„wr•.µxw R.Y r wq 12.0 Ir•_ r N wU«Y r N wR Jl.ur w11 N,w.••.•Nw i«l•N wwµ«•M rM Ry p.l w4 wN w•1 12.0 •««Mx! qan .1« ! LR i 1: R 0 TM t 1210 R 1Y R 0 LT. �2 M 0 ! , ) E ✓ • 1. I N U R w Y.J: �"1 .R Y i•�:4 Y 11N Y R U R � w U 'Jt �. Y% ! I� h CV J I VOLUMES� � SATURATION a R A 1 U' ! MOVEMENT LOS ! Pk �- « x « N ! r ! 4 1 Yr �� iw! LI«� r! � 1 r ► TOT! LW � r�� !., r !«N r ri � l�:IT 9 ••N Nw N YY WN.••n ! wYl' M Iwl•-«Ix wS.9Y«I««••M w«.«♦IN rrNf rrYl •«r•H«•r• r JJw 91«• ! «I•:1«rµ•1 Nw wN w«r•w JIIN Y«1J wl•Yr..M«•Wfl li•r wr lirl !MN ww WII r.••«•9.W N Nw Nwµ•r NI«wN-wW wll wfl { 17 scUNrf•i ! :1:.r05 511 0 718 ! 42% 91% 01 Z ! A ! Y 1238 4 i 1712 ! 0% 91% 7 hx ! n . .a • n C■ D w ! WEST ! 0 p [ , EAST ! :0 5 K 520 72 5 ! E J/ 0/ 9 1/ ! t'. 5 ! w ! .14 A(�'�•r R ! Nrr:!•S! ! X—WLK! PED:3? NO! !, PHASING 1 • N W -I w rµ µ N ! !-----! ---------- 1. !'u « ,W � Ww MW W i w N h W N w w N« M W Www N M u ! N�. lift ! ''5„ ( % ! ! ! Mw NM ! ! ! 1 1\1 ! sa 0%! ! N ! ,««N,, !N S—D X r:EtT I ON SEPA :ANN I C] ;;Iw,-, .) ! a W ! . 0% ! ! ! NNW ! ! :'1 W—DIRECTION SEPA A TI ON (C-4) ! W 1' ! J w,OY'! ! ! Ar'P1:OA1wH ''Vf+--,: VALUES ! ' MOVE: ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST ! -------! ------___---------_-----_--_--------------t , ; ! . 0000 R'�63 .000 . 2089 ! 3 ' R N-A>JJ! . 0000 it 0000 .0000, . 1789 ! N!N ! . .,L.-..,89, a 3 '2`:� u 0000 0000 ! Li. . 1178 . 00�'1 .0000 , i170 � ��! S ! • � LEG VOLUME ll�� 1 � 1 "!�T h'lE AVAIL � >? ��.� 1! STORAGE ! WJ� 1 MOVE ,J�'�U�:JAr�E 4 w 1 A "' .w W _, w•N Yw�li wr�x ! AT V W+rf N f r , I,JrN WN rw rwwN NU1 wN1w r�u ! W I,« z LOS INIr ! A! !IN�-,� ! �lJ r r�� �r' �.:� � ►°�� M.r i ! I • •Wi rNN ! N.Y,ww Nw N«9 NY,�"INN NV«w«M+N INN i W19+NN rr 1' .Wfi NYJI 1•ir wN NW rllf rJ•I llrr NW•rN rwµN W r wW Hµ w wM i•••,W9 WN Nw N•N ' 5, 0U�frH I " 1" I SOUTH I 80. 0 80.0 I 23 2 I � f i r 1 /00 �C.3U"rf J '� �� � � �0 ��,.����� �r�.4•:, 0 G... NORTH ! 2262 I NORTH ! . 0 48. 0 46. 0 ! 0 636 4E37 ! Vii•r I ,,,z,';60 I WEST ! �y r 0 +�0 i! �G�! . :AST I 5Se ! EAST ! 24. 0 . 0 70 a 0 ! 0 0 3 61 ! r li M 4 ilk y +■ M • . w ___- : II —SIGNALIZED; w w - -IO � ww r r aw r w - )r1 � , x �.: 1 4 : t INTERSECTION , T I :AR „ ;'EEN U ► AND «WY 21 7 SF AMP . 1 r' • 14 VOLUMES.: ' "A'L 'TRAFFIC A/1 • METRO SIZE: 20 O 0 `r0 100,00 ANALYST: DICK WOELrK ;7�. ,i, •'. . : . !PHASE . N���„ I � C i r tih w !PHASE C w I r i w rww w 0 r.- � Y= 12 I -.rrr,.,wrwrrrl I rr«r-r 1 wr » ..M ! .....— _... ! w.wrrww« I ...;w —.....w t • I I ,! I I I ' I ' ! ***************4<-** ****** ' 1 ' ,G• ! ' ! ' 1, ! 1 ! ► * SATURATION 69 *1 I r N.r•«w wr w»»W! Mw ww w.iNw »I-r ! H» rwy Y•r I w»W»w --' 1 '-wr rrl Mrr,wr - 1:w «IN«rN Nw wN! ******•ifrr*******n�***`�.•**,*.al* ��'''YY i • • III___ ..."""Ili !!!l--.rrr r' I' Il .l Iv n ff^--. �f : �,� ! " APPROACH LANE GEOMETRY Y ! I . SOUTi"'! r�lC�irlar!.H ' , WET : ' EAST. ! t',,,: ,. LANE ! MOVE W:C D I°i MOVE' w:1 3 CH : , :HOVE WIDTH MOVE :WIDTH ! w«wx rNr wM r,« I W.i Nw r».wrr w»r.x rW NN....r..... r r.w Irw.1r•r ww.lw rw rr.r w wll w»—N xY•.....,...r r•Y 1....W Y rW Yw.14..w«Wr vw r•w««.1«....w wr wU'rw+»iw:..r»l..n rw ww rr—Mr w»rw w,W»w.l ww M«rwi I •. '' 1 I, ''! R. 4 12,,' V�/1 '1 ,N' - 1 2„0 , R„ C 12 11 YJ 'N 11 d • P/�jy��. ! i Ji{ ! • f•. N '.t:.r e.0 ' L.». tl 12, 0 , LT(1 2. 0 N M N ' d 0 1 44 I fr • M a ! {y N N M N ! MOVEMENT.r�l 'r�T JCL»;h►ry � � ! MOVE' SATUh: ,T OIL! ! t"�C11JE i t�iT LOS ! �� A`it . !! T ' rY . f TE I fI LT::„ T H: RI: ! LT TH' F r ! �•. « OUT - ! 0' 482245 727 ! 0' % 6,:j ! 42% ! N L.: A ! fl' L I CJFi TH ! 148 6 456 ! 2S% >~i'~J% s ! A WEST r ! 207 0 :235: ' 44 i ! 6 l 0% 5i% ! ' C e : B ! : H • EAST I 0 0 0 0 ! b/ 01 0/ / N i N NN A� j x • Awr-rl"..l w«t I 1 Tw{x rw H.....,s wr I i wX Y Mw WwN Lwr HN !r«w WDwr Hsw rr'xw Ml.l WM N w,l I I'.Mw Ww.r•J Nw NM rx WIl.wl awl wx r.Y r W wIN PHASING • « r«•xw axr alrr W«.««MII H»r w«1•.ir ww ilw rw th I wN 0%1 I 4; I W«Y,r I I F N 1 :'0"%! ! ,ICI ! r.-W.., ! !N'/E D I r:�ECT I ON �.E';EPARAT I OI i (C-,.. ::) ! y W i• 5, o% ! ! W ! -.:w ! !C /W�-D. i~lt h'"r 7�JI�� � E(:',q �A.T ON (C-•4) ! � 5 11 0',/ ' ! E ! :..:— I I ,! ±' ,I ! APPROACH V/C VALUES ;: ;,' ' ' t '' MOVE ! SOUTH NORTH W5ST' '' EAST +, 1 1 F: il ! r+ 0000 N 1308 :0000 ! l ,.. . 'i!' , ' R —ADJ! . 0000 ,:0000 ' 0794: 0000 ! r, T. H .2878 . i711' : ' . 0000 : 0000 ! , - , I: Ls ! : 0(600 '. 0470 : 11':0 ;, 0000 I . r. I 1� ,�'I I Ili" . Y I LEG VOLUME I - m1 • j� ,A .1 M V F ►I I I , ' r LEG '�OL.arl�l�, ! l��1�'i�, 1"'1�1`'.t��.I �I,ti.3�.�_;.1,I� ,, 1.7�Y� v.TT�1��,�wI�W �, 7 i i.E A r LO S : ra►`I Irk! Lt ��� r.�r ! LT TH .T a rr , .( Wu r,N ru:i.4N«tx wif 1 W/1 wr•11rU wW w11 W4 Nw MN Lli Wu U1k.wu' wN rMl iN'ry wr wM.iln.1 «iY xr.w>..i•i)Wlt�rrr M1w Y14.iii w�u»:U.r.r WrM WH ww 1LN raw.wl 1'r+«iiL,.rW{.i.1 wia r.l�wy WI.Ir.i.wM.Mw1 iW LN.3w wl. 1 r SOUTH 1. • 1040 ! SOUTH 1 ':0 ' 87 g 4 I 87.'4 ,! 0 ' '352 , 17'r ! ` 'i �{ '�r r � � . w • .� + 1LJ � ! � 4J 1-f `yl 0 4F 5G'' M i,''.': I :i t a��l f`�a �I ��,��" I i~.fo�;�rM�! ! "�"�: 'M �O�H��I� b � �� WREST' !: 0E�5 ! W�WE0yT ! 1,'8:N ry6 0y{' ,0.14: r1:; ! 0 : 0 1 17 !, '�, •� EAST ! 824 ! EAS'fa, ! w l{,I . 0 u:0 ! 0 0 0 1 1 • ti N , • . i} w � � �� M E � T "» E� r � ~, 7wA VERB� �c ` 7� INTERSECTION: TI t RD 3FEENBU ► AND HWY 217 B FAM VOLUMES. TOTAL TRAFFIC PM PEAH'a ., ,, METRO SIZE: 20y'000 000 TO 1.00 q 000 ANALYST: DICK WOEl._H {i . wx!PH ASE ! PHASE !PHASE !PHASE ! PHASE' , C= , ) = 7� Y= 12 . , �! �I i I I ! b3 -Dk 3 �' w Fr 3 �X fi � 1 ! 1 L I, I ! * }. ''i ! SERVICE LEVEL' a1 ! � t i I I 1 ! ! , , ! �! ! I * SATURATION 109%, ''' nn I 1 I i I I . I I rN ,..x—...N ! w. xwwrww,w I .. ;ti....i...,.w ! wi Wxw w. I wwr.w.,r„...W.N I ..iw..wNNww!._.,! *****************'*****'** • . ',I ! ' ' APPROACH LANE. G E(DMl:�TR�� + � ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST I k . • J ! . LANE ! MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH' ► . • .....xw rNw...IN I aww. WWw Nw.wl1 u«.« .xµww wN Ux. r.lw wr w.M\......rwiW.xwwM MN.wli wr hr.M,N w.. w..w wi Nr w... wu wh w..w.I N.N w....w wli ir...wr .!. Nw..wi i.r 4w ►' l''''' HY 1 4 41K Mx d d Ntl � R d N 1i d G .0 I �� w I T d � 1w tl1 �� tl d � d 0� a T tl 1wN K d d d N 0 I . ,1 ! d it d :, L. d d L d d„o ti Y d p d d K • y, ! MoYEML;:Nir VOLUMES ! MOVE SATURATION ! MOVEMENT LOS A , AF1I: ! LT) NrH-I NT :TOT '! I t ' TH . RT ! �_T TH RT ! rlr Nul w.f M..hi.,:MN ►Iw :..err.wf : ..wrW ! Hw w .ya I Wr N.N i.u.IrN ww ..Nly WN xwa wN xri I , 11. SOUTH ! ' 0 ' , 04 11 -E 19 ! 0'.4. :109% , ' isw�” ! ^ . d F A O HI=T H I /^,4 5i ', ' 7,86, I �»(�y O 1� is 0 r ► _i F 1 1. 1 W I l::! � � C1 Kxl�r �fL.l.,�Y?r K1 fd . � f r A u ICI E,.3 xT' 442 , 0 , 245 67 � i i Pw� 4 01'tp ,.��./4/:�./. , F d a . B ! ,,•N�.1'I LrS 11i I 0 ' 0 0 Y.! ! 7/1� Y.J�' 1W/1 ! lY M a ■ M Y 11 d d 1 I. . 1 A1 W 7NH u ! ! x MWIxJH ! P Lts.^i ,`NO! I , PHASING ! ".'"--NN wx► wN wM Mi+.NN HIw I I WNU. .IW. I W uiw.rui rw NMrx Nw.Mi ! I wU,ui.lj""uw.fWl wN:..N x.H r.N N..1 x.r f....W.....MNW'iNNY.W.r.»..+NWi....WU Wi wx N.N'MM«w Wi WU wN i:iu N.i I � ! 1 1..!,' . �J d �u I I ix Nw I''. I 1 h. ' I S % I 1, I' ,,-,,-H I � I Sew. I:Hi C i SEPARATION d HI, �. W,�N11 I N I d 0%1 i , ��� � �.I+�I�,N� �''i,'Z'hl�r_"� x bp�.�I ,�(�^;��^,���.�►`r�'rI�C'��y fey( .�W �,� . • � p W ! r 0%1 !' W ! ....Nx. ! ! E/ W—D�1 1�:µC:T'X tJN 8EF'AIr A�i I(iN t�1�,..../;i) I 4 J' I 1 I w wN I I rt • �. ' ' ! ' AP'F OA►�H VV1,;;, VALUES ! . OVE I SOUTH ��IC NCI err. ► N i F`l WE EAST � i .ir.NW wM r.w H W ►N.i NW wr...r NW wu rN 3wM.....1....wW w+«M IIN..«.n W If{r Y.M/wa i..ii rw Nr Hw IM NNi i.ii HW i.w rw tw rw M.+...J I.i..i.i..�lw i.w Nvf Wr rN..r.w I ' ''''J r R ! M39 ,0000 . 1, 61 R 0000 ' ! ' • ! , WAD ! : .:0000 ; ',, '• .00001 ' , °w 1011, .0000 ! ;: t,. ..' ! .2E300 d 42'56 , , 0e)0(i.1 b 0000 ! i' L L' , ! „,0000 , ':. 20-$`: -,2540 , ,0600 I ;; M �E ' I :H .:' ' ''''''H I NE►�`� V b l.>.La t~1 L:� �! �� . � �� "1N T;.(`,'I�', �',4�,��A���LN �;.����Iw;5';) ! � ��r 'STORAGE ! . L�N,1 ! A Lrawa +r. I AI I r. I...,t t PT 1 L..- -1N.1 �; r r r. 3 I I~ { ,W''.wNMNw..ti. i wNrN1Wµ ...rWrWIw MN..1NIW{wNn I • ....3rW�.... 1N rNN...144.4,4- ,...4 Nw o...41.o...41...W MM INN-wµ wx i _.MN.NW�..wNN:NW�N N,N. _ .N I i OUTH ! Cr I SOUTH ' I ..0 22.8 :2,8 18TO!A1;E LENL'Nf HE! ' • NO '1..H ! ' 0 ! :; NU1P.;TH f 4b E ,3 4 6 'b 0 !NUT PEL�IABLE: At ! ' ' • WEST'" `'t '! WEST ::: ! ���,�` ,G .d 0 :,,48 d 4 !°rH I B Ls VEL or ! EAST ! �� ,, ! . „ LAST I w 0 �, �s o ' -0 !SiE !V X i"�E I �,. { J ' ' ' ' ' . . ' , ,,, .• . ' ,, , . , o n , /OP , .. , ,..., --SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION --SIGCAP-- VERS(21jart87) . INTERSECTION: TIGARD GREENBURG AND HWY 217 SRAMP d il VOLUMES: TOTAL TRAFFIC PM PEAK 11 0 METRO SIZE: 20, 000 TO 100, 000 ANALYST: DICK WOELK p , !PHASE ! PHASE ! PHASE ! PHASE !PHASE ! PHASE ! C= 411) 0=108 Y= 12 l' , , ! ! ! ! 1 1 ! ************************ L . ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ! * SERVICE LEVEL F * : ittitil * SATUPPTION 106% * 3 , , t---_......,..1------ l -,,--......,- I ...---.-.. 1 -..----- !---"---! ************************ f' 1 ! APPROACH LANE GEOMETRY 1 ., , ! ' SOUTH NORTH , 1 WEST EAST 1 LANE ! MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH ! . . ----_ t ___-___---_L______________________________________________. ! 1 ! R. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 R. . 12. 0 . . . .0 ! 2 1 T. . 12. 0 L . . 12. 01 LT. 12. 0 . . . .0 ! • . , MOVEMENT VOLUMES ! MOVE SATURATION ! ' MOVEMENT LOS APPR ! LT TH ' NT, ToT ! LT TI RT ! LT TH NT ! ., ...................„ ! ..........................,,....,.............„_„..„..,..,..,....„.....,.,..........,..... ! ...,......,....,..........,,........0...„...........m......................„.„ ! ...._,...„....,...„..............,.......„....,........„..... SOUTH ! 0 504 115 61S ! 0% 1 106% 32% ! . . . F A ! l' • NORTH ! 645 766 , 0 1411 ! 56% 106% 0% ! B F xnx n 1 WEST ! 1 442 0 245 687 ! 106% 1 0% 48% ! r . . „ A ! I : • ' , EAST ! 0 0 0 0 ! 0% 0% 0% ! . . . , . . . . . ! 1.• , . 1 APPR! TNKS ! ! X-wLI.O. PEDs? NO! ! I PHASING 1 ! s N ! 5. 0%! ! N ! -- ! M/S-DIRECTION 'SEPARATION CC-4) ! W 1, 15. 0% ! ! W ! -- ' ! HE/W,-DIRECTION SEPARATION ! I .0% ! ! 5 ! -- ' 1 L ' „:. • ! APPROACH V/C VALUES ! . i. - . “ MOVE ! SOUTH , NORTH WEST EAST ! 1 7 • [' R ! . 0839 .0000 . i861 ' .0000 ! 1 -ADJ! . 0000 . 0000 . 1000 .0000 ! • .. . , , 1 1 0(900 4',,,J6 , .0000 .0000 ! 1 L ! . 0000 . 2059 .2540 . 0000 ! 1 . ' ! LE.G VoLUM ! ! TIME. AVAIL (SI,ICS) ! MOVE STORAGE ! . E . .. I.„EG ! Al' LO8 c ! ApPN ! 1...T TI,-1 ri.i!T ! LT TH RT ! UTH r :1'..'45 ! SOUTH ! .0 31 .5 31 .5 !STORAGE LENGTHS! . . NONTH , 1U4o 1 NORTH ! 47. 9 47, 9 . 0 !NOT RELIABLE AT ! WEST ! 567 ! WEST ! 2E3. 6 . 0 60. 1 !THIS LEVEL or ! 1 EAST ! 827 I EAST ! . 0 r . 0 . 0 !SERVICE . , , ' I I. • , I ' \ I 1 i • , I ' I l''''. . ■ • �I 1 �. 1 1: UNSI 13NIAL z ZED INTERSECTION CAPAC z TY CALCULATION FORM I �� a`INTERSECTION rlIT r � �•••. N tl 1 '' • Y. '1"z .� I v� A .D 1r � I ";�,I•+1A L.:Y,«r 1 . DICK«,:�':: l��►Q F:'EM i-J•�:; • hd lay: L1 'T z C7t�l HALL BLVD AND OAK wr�� { f,, ALTERNATE; T OTAL TRAFFIC METRO SIZE:, „ y oC TO 100, 000 w:OOUNT• AM EA{•": TYPE OF CONTROL: STOP LOCATION F'L.At`.1 n 1 . APPROACH H COD :S. ARE F 1. „.,, LANE 1 2 3 4 GRADE= 0% 1 I ,. 3 Las ; 1 GRADE== ; . Call. ' " ' 1a ,ru Iw.Ii.b«i- 44n,•NN w« .•Y•••• w W4 Nw r«• «rl wrl «N«. 1 ', 1 rN -r •.Ir4 w.rni ww « i w«LN.. N rM rlq wri w«r«««. f . It A I3 4 l „N 1 I k .w Ian:AD E- . 0% 1 SP '11'1 MPH w. y RESTRICTED SIGHT 1 :Dr5E IS 1. 1' rf r { { t�{rl I•r :- r rl i�.Er•r ADJUSTMENTS — ACCELERATION LANE? NO . • CURB RADIUS OR TURN ANGLE? N rN 1,•ri w«r«r «r rul w WI r N rN Wr wIN'wwi wN 4•li 4w Nw wii rr NW 1 :wr rr 1:rr r.W ri rr wM Mw rw 4r•w rN r4 w rNl w«u.••««•Wr wr rM wr w•r w •wr rr wr rr wi•1rN rr •rr wl M«I wr xr 1r,w,/rr wr r 4,Y1... �. • r,, 1 A I.f 1''''R 1 A 1 1 '' 1 1, 1 1 1 1 w• � 1 ," Wr w Y•N wr.lW�•••M ,«•al«r««iw rr r rr r wN 4W M Wil �-!M Nw wr w4.rry«w rrl ru wr w4« . ••l.,N W �•r•4M 4 wr MJ ry r «411..11 wN CT w«Nrl wN w..r,. w•r y-,I wN 41«rN•r«1r1 y�•u 4r wM ww rr.i:w,.rN w,w•rw 1 MOVE 1 AL 1 A-r 11i AR 1 E4'L 1 «r I B 1 1':I..: 1 �w+ 11 (.vR 1 1JLI' 1 DT' 1 DR, EL 1 VOL 1 1.8(''� 1 f 1 23 1 /'19 1 20'31 q `• 1 qq c I / C7 I Yr �!1 w»trJ 1 40 1 8 1 d 1 18 1 28 1 16 1 .1,`'Fs 1 621 1. 1 f '1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 C3 1 3 1. 1 181 'w'r` 1 r 8 1 d .Iw:wl,t' 1 1, 1 LANE ' 1. 1 1 1 1 1 , nJ.1 1 , 1 i 1 r..i r.4'Nw r rN r « rr«N.i i Nr Nw..... ww•uN«w N.x N,4 wN w»Nw it «w N. ilw NW 4w"«w,.... «r Wr rw iw 1....w4 rr•Mr 4w iir wr IN•%4r w4 1N« «««,1 «+.N W rr rW err.w I.r w."w.Nr « »...««Wr rw wr W 4r ' STEP RIGHT TURN FROM 1•w:/L C DR , a CONFLICTING FLOWS `-MH 292. 209.. V `H 1 i C f1T I CAL GAP r TG 5.0 5. 0 SECS i . POTENTIAL CAPACITY " M t ' W TI . 5µ wN H I. N DEMAND r IL CAPACITY USED = 3. 477 I 6.556 i. IMPEDANCE FACTO : M: .977 fJ5�8-' !„ SHARED LANE r- SEE STEP t I +, L NO SHARED LANE W4 RESERVE = Vii. 0.' PCH I s 1, 1 DELAY 84 LOS r 440. N/A � 1' • ,1 w . M I4r rI WO.r wN.. wN «1Mrl wr r4 ...4r r44 wr r«i•ii,1,,,14 0,14 NW rw N«rl•1 w wi Nw wM1 W 4 wfwi N W N.....•w...xr 4w rr .i ii.N 4W I•••,W*44 w{irw.«w M r .rr iir... Iw«r .,r uY wil ry N 1 STEP 2 -w LEFT TURNS 1 ;oM 8/A BL AL 1 ,1 , 1 CONFLICTING f"LNC W8 -41 MH - 303. 1 213. VF1f•{ 1,:1;;'I rr I lALlw i3AP re tt .4 p 1; 4:5 81 1':, POTENTIAL CAPACITY `-4 M2 .~t 589. 1084. F,CH DEMAND = I 44 20 f- CAPACITY USED UE E D = 4, 45 1 . ` 'X i I MPiEDAN r E FACTOR - 7 . 1.8r ' AVAILABLE �hES�FVF � � �: ��C�. PCH ■ , DELAY LOS A • , , i. , ' I ' I r • • —«.vM:...._..,.,......-...i...,. ..w.. .., ._.....�..... ....��...., ......................._-„ _. --..,... r......r...:.1_,..,_ w.,...e..,—is i... :.i.....,.. i.o. ....- ��, „-.�.-x.¢.,..�.ar.u�.w.,u...,,..........,,_,. , I 41 • wl.mr1•.r«ww_-r« w..mr. w.•.•1r wrM«r«.rN-r.r fxr«.n.•x wM M..w..rrl rw r«r mn m.l rwr MN MN wr.l w•.+r♦Nn wN rwu .•••.N_.mw rrl mw r..l r+.1m m rMurr r«r m_ rw•+rw r.w r.ww w.. m rtr+rr r'+r 17� ' . STEP O THRU MOVEMENT FROM C/D CT DT II CONFLICTING FLOW MT �- 563. ;7C!� VF'iwl CRITICAL G Ar + rl «r 4 �� 8 n; SEC: a • POTENTIAL CAPACITY I TY `-" MN3 = 572„ `566, F'CH ; IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT = M3 = 548. 542. PCH DEMAND = CAPACITY USED w2. 15 18 29 PCH �. % i IMPEDANCE FACTOR = P3 = . 979 . 96E NO SHARED LANE r . AVAILABLE RESERVE= G 1, O. PCH DELAY < LOS =-' N/A N/A SHARED aAh ; WITH LEFT T u;r 1 SEE 4 SHARED LANE DEMAND = O O F'c:l-I f, POTENTIAL CAPACITY = M13 = Oh Oh PCH RESERVE O ) PCH H I,.A V A I L w = M O n , a DEI AY `;� LOS = N/A N/A r wN Nw Hr wi.NM r nM NM Nm_M mx NM rliV{ir Hwy MN Nw INN..IN IxN MN wM..«.Y_H wl:wH.Ii1NW.IW Nm.l.x�:M,4r MM tM•NW Mw MN«M w._m.l r.4.m.nw.•...M.w N..wN Nlr..11.NIW w14 Nm MM M4 41N llm tow.4H Nrr Mw..N•4/.NM.4M!NN NM Inr tfM Mw Hlr.Im xM Mr 4r �/ • �t r STEP 4 — LEFT TURN FROM C/D 1 1 CL DL. CONFLICTING rLows = MH = 651 . 614. VPH i H CRITICAL T I CAL4 I AP r.. Ti r`" 5 11 >u EiWlS M/ 1 M rl . 1 .wl L.I fJ 1.J 5. 5 �a Im.m1 1w� POTENTIAL CAPACITY wr MN = 513. 537. PCH IADJUST PoF':: IMPEDANCE: 53 493. PCH I\1O SHARED LANE DEMAND = 0 0 PCH ," • AVAILABLE RESERVE =" O. O. PCH I m DELAY & LOS = I N/A N/A WITH LEFT & THRU j SHARED LANE DEMAND =1. 0 :A�AI :['TY OF It"A( D LANE r 0. PCH • • I AVA X LA tLE RESERVE _: 0. 00 PCH DELAY &I LOS = N/A N/A WITH LEFT, THRU, & RIGHT .,r SHARED LANE DEMAND Nr` 50 115 PCH , • . IM:AF'AIm.,T TY OF E'HAF'.1ED LANE =tt 718. 719. 11:1-•I I. I AVA Ir.I,�.An Nip: RESERVE , 666 e 04. !• Iw.H i E A A D�:DELAY L.:r i = "1 • LN•1"w INw.1+H•w ww Mw.4«r Iwr H•x M:6:fn 1 Fw M•i nM HM Nwi!4w HNi .....W l'•rr MNf H «::W.1 w cr w:Nw MW flan Nw M•.ww•lrl ux.Mw Ixx.1•w Hw H"i i...,W Y•w...«w,..uw rM..wN wW wu:u IIW 1ww.:x Nr w...LL•:•yx-N MY Y..1•..w41 wN r1 i6 LOS C VOLUMES FOR LEG C FbF:. LEG x) VIEIIw.1.L.L a PER HOUR I 31 0, 256 ,I iWN rw.nt.I..n Ir!w:rN l.i.+rw 1..«Yr.,4....4...1 r .i.it Ml.w4 N.Y W 4 wll•r1V NM..+it rN M..rN 4r jM.wH.,.........1..........1.................................•4N NYrV W.■µ«I LN r..HW Nr i.4:+..frn IN:.wr.......Nr.....urH f_N 1:.,4.._«t Mw N«.rrY Mrf.•..Nr 11 `I 'i 1 i i ro I ," • 0 �I S� i- , ti I NI :sEcT.TJ ON i::AF`Ac:I TY ��:ALCULAT I ON FORM �. ��.H,.aI_�tlA�. x�7rFJ�'w �• 4--WAY INTERSECTION 1.7'11"Y„ -1"I CARD, ' ANALYST g DI 17.:f: WoEr 1,...1•, • INTERSECTION: HALL B x,11 AND 'OAK �S"C • ALTERNATE: TOTAL TRAFFIC 1MME:1«F::O SIZE': 20,000 TO 100, 000 COUNT: PM r'L"AK ' TYPE or CONTROL: STOP LOCATION PLAN p APPROACH CODES ARE D LLANL 1 ' '3 4 i. FADE=- '40% l : '1 ! f: ! I .'"7 1 , : I I RiE . 0: Iw ,1•rw•,•� .•w« rr IHII JNN ww»M» •w.l .r•w Nwl«•«r.»r Nrl W'r 4«{M« wr.w wry Nr wl wJ«w11 wr wk ww•••x rw rjH.M w•1 r./W.r w11 • b � . A I N uw•x••rH xw Nw••w wr wN Lr•.Nr.w.rw.•w.. r r..•I 1 wr r.w414«Nw r rw H,.:,N.w•w.»w •1r••_r Nr»,.I.w Nw r« I ' ww w w.1•. w 11r....•w w » w . GRADE= n 0% , 1, 1-- — 17iRA)DE , 0%I � I � i . Y+ SPEED: 0..� MPH iw , ,.cl, 1°.: STF I IW:TED SI Cil-1 CODE. 'I w7 1 , . t I h *; w � „ . AL-I :E1•WFI:AT I:ON LANE? , NO I r.LJRB I AD I US OR TUf�:N ANIFiLGE'?+ NO 4 1 A ' -'11;+ I A I B I Iw1 I 1 1 . •w�w� •� ww wrJ NNi Mr wN N{«»41 MN wN wN r.4 wr••••1 wr WN rr�.WN 1rM ww1✓•N Wr1 w»Nw.wr Irr N.4 Nw»•N•«»wu r•rN wi w«wri x41 irw w•• N wr N•• w r N N•w a+.l J» « J. N MNr•••w rw'w NN .rl ww N Wx WN•.•.1 w. N MN w rN I I. 1 I.I1.)VE 1 AL I AT I AR I 81— I 13T I pF: ' I N'CLr I CT,' wo,1 I IWr I wDL I D«1H I D.i f, • L b w 27111 '': i,. . r w • '80t + 1 ' + i r may/ 1113 5 ,1 1 1101', r0 I 62 t I VOL l '1' 1 4411 i JI::. I 4NJ S'! 1 W�•:+t' .i:r ti l t L�J«1 ,l 1 xa +w H I 521 1 I 1 401 , 1 251 571 .I. 1' SS " 2 1 1 . ' ,, I LANES', 1 i 1 1 ' t 1 I • J 1 llw W«« w»wN•w.J Wr,.Ny r«4 NM NW 4w 14u 4w iHN Wu r1+.N.r•N 1•H rlw{Ir.NN«w.rw•NN N Ni{.ww wr w»N«•NW Mw ».+ww Nw N N Mw•..1 4w i•w W r r + r Jr.l..M Nl r,J.L J«i WN N«.ryw,Nor Nw Mr Lw«W u h..W r,rlw.r•{Nw ' 4 . • ' STEP l RIGHT�h ` �U F � FROM" �/D C + DR � ' • . CONFLICTING FLOWS - NH 7 ' ' 01 ViP.H � n.. . .. CRI T I C A L GA P = TG . , . 0 , ..i SEC POTENTIAL CAPACITY ” I i = 754'. ' ' 711 . 5Ilw.1-I 1 JEAND � � ° . `= f IMPEDANCE r Ai:JTOF:. -� .' 88 . 9'34 • HAD D LxJANfw — E STEP I W NN 110, 0, L L./ ISM1 1.•! NO SHARED LANE — RrE.` 5..P.V = 0ft: , , , ; , 0 Ptr:1-1 DELAY n, LOS =- �NI •N/A i): . xw , L J••,»wrr J wr••••wN •N 4w xy wr—wN rw» wN!NN.•••1 w»N,I•- rW NN W x W J 4«e W r MM Nw 1 •"t' h Yw ww-wx Yw a.w NN!- wJ�{�•.i W N:w.r N i•w L.N W.A L.N N L{ Nw r r-•N i. wN w.c wN NNJ 4w l.u- Jww.r»�«..:.: -'Lw,«r1 W 0,«ti'N.••wN.:1N ur.u...aw.: , N { w — i, c. .. �. �. A Lr � D L ,� 1w.O � 1 A r ' VP H,�'�} N r ,� �; /� . M1 � a 1 S r L 4aJ3« 516'. '1P�H, , 1 .O [F L. 1WIT J i�11� FL_OIr�,. f"fhI �� lw:r:I T I i::�ti' ... GAP TL w 4} Lw",��'. ' 8(:71":8 ' ' •'L_'1":8 ! 1 OTL...NT•LAL lwlAPAc..I T`�1 JL...`` M2�. w.rN' , ',WTI'x+41. � ,' `.rf i a 1''OH , , j{ 1 DEMAND �,�: wIN CAPACITY' US D ; ' 4, 74 ' 6,50 / 1 1 MI �EDA1 1 I FACTOR ..« ,58 . w , A4 AI LAELNE :Es'ERVE = 8�M1w.' � S a F'CH L A4'' LO8 =' , A P ... �� �-�wr� 4 . . , . ,• � . '...tiJ.-.W r ..,..i:��,....l.a...Nisa�>-..,_�. �x_..a�,..a,i,�...� .....mn•.NU.I J....w G.,d....r,. i., a....a..i.welle,...a..K. .. "4 w.«»w ««.....w.. .-1«-.. r•r• �= F � � �" ' C " C D CT, ,,.*, i::ON EL I C:T r.NO FLOWS = MT z 1046. 1087. VF'H • CRITICAL 8AF' = TO a = 5 l �b 5 C C a POTENTIAL CAPACITY = MN3 812. 816, F'CH ADJUSTMENT , IMPEDANCE* _ - _ � �{: , DEMAND 7 �.`;; F'1�:N.rI' 1•' . , CAPACITY USED wr 1S.25 7.91 Xtl ti. I MPEDANi::E ' w A►;-:TOF: «... P3 ' . 86'D r 94J 6 E.6, . . NO SHARED' LANE �1 A VAIL,A LE RESERVE= IH H, 0 0.; ' P— I F'',f� DEI.«.AY P, L. N/A N/A ..., „ : , I HARED ,LANE WITH LEFT TURN SEE STEP 4 , 't'a SHARED LANE DEMAND = CA'P'ACITY , p` E h ` A w 1 i = ' r 0 '+H O. PO F d_• , ,, AiVA I LAE#L..E RESERVE = ' ' ,H ta„ 0. Iz'r.H s . DELAY r LOS = N/A 1\1/A (''' , l• «w ww wW.«Y rr«.:l.w.N««{N ww.flW r•W. r1Nw««.I.w.{ww wll.wnr WM«w.f« {I..NN.ww«W...«I.w ww 1«..rrw Nw.««« .w...+Mlw.wl,ww..iM wwY 1«««w r wW..W NM«r.«rNw YN««r frf WM,ww«rw «w w«w ..w{««« «.. {r...f«w+wr r • f rl' STEP 4 --, Lw. F.-1" TURN FROM C/D 1131 .C . DL � CONFLICTING L J w � '' 199.. V PH „ CRITICAL A� -� �► = i Li ELo. S H PC ILw NT I AIN« CAPACITY -«. MN = 280. 257, Pi1..:I•-I s;. AD� U � F O F hEEA� wE �� u F: NO SHARED LANE DEMAND 0 � 0 Pi�:H r A)AILAELE F E3ERV =w 0, On PCH k, . , DELAY & Lr.O; = � , • N/A ' NIA I, ' ' ' WI I-1 LET <, TI-HR:U I S1-'IA :Et) LANE DEMAND 0 • 0 PC!-{I CAPACITY or SHARED LANE = 0. 0 WIH RESERVE O. F:H AUA LA t E - !tl Y 8, ,LOS = N/A NIA WITH• LE FT y Tl�IF',IJ 0 �f F I Ei IT �� SHARC:D LANE DEMAND = ,2'03 1.'2$ F'��:�-1 � AC I TY or ' SHAF Et L ANA 4 8 . 51'21-1 „�� '� '�. �„�I''Yj� 'wl � 5.Y 'Mi � Iw Cw:l � 1 +"�� t �� �i� . � i 8w» yt W �w p y i 282 r � AY < OS = L 8 rW e:J C i l" . .r � .y wr«w.«...+wNw«Ww..twW..«.NUw«w.:l««I.++...+.+aww..w,,,,,,..,'.....4..1«.w««W Nw W«ww w.l u...ww.lw.»w.w».. rw - w.w «..f w.«...1... N..1 i ' p i w W MW Y.w«.L.w rw rN Nr lr«r wW iw1 rW W«W.ww Ifr Lw MY..w.M wL r+..iM l.w rY Yw/W4,Jw w.ui«.w w«.°i.l.r w.f f MI Mw M..f YE L �r NYi 4. II C ( 11r• C li `w/t r 1 1 .i.J t Y r.��� LEG w / �w. n �7 kwl�.? ,« w I� LJI�'I , :•„ V E H I 1w:L 5 p juw l''4, I'-to u I;S, 1 dh, h Y « b f,., ' ...r ::w r, .r ww..W.wr..:.uN ww f...w.s...w«....W N«u w«f Y.«1..«uw wYl Ic.....:. wi- w.le'aw wwr,ww W«..Y«..fa NI w.«w...w.i i...wrY««I:.y„.....wYN ww w:w w..l ui W:r w.....:.wN Y.....«N...uN Y:,.1.fr w.........,.r.{o...w.rw ww»W:..w N.w L.wY w—..::r.w.r.«:. iV G"t,r: � /S�J �. . I� ti; �. P ' oerit,"4 ” r • \ ..' : ' ' rM'.....-..,w«+...,...,...w....._.,..r ,. .,,.._. ... ..........1.«....r,_,_.A ....,.,... ..ter...• .w.a..,_M».r1......, w.....•.,i. u .•....., . F 1 1 I , � li UNS I o1',IIAL•I ZED I1\1warEF:Sfig•C.:T ION C..:AF'Ac:I-I'.rY C:AI««C:UI„«Al„I ON FORM , 4—WAY INTERSECT I ON1N - FJ l C H INTERSECTION: t♦ F:EENBI.IR6 AND LoI::uST ALTERNATE: TOTAL TRAFFIC METRO SIZE: 20, 000 TO 100,000 . 7 � Ur a R PF f LOCATION PLAN: �1. , APPROACH CODES ARE 1 D 1 1 }, LANE 1 t 1 1 GRADE= 0 r I I I t , 4 .4 O I E 4 2 I I 3 A D r r O n t L n C r • ', Nw xw .w«.w r•n rr wr Nw w ««IN«wN rH�Nw.•r,Iw• 1' ''" 1 IW•+ « rNw w�r+..rr•.-rr«w Hw wr rw.' ...� �; ' ° yGRADE= „"-0;••r 1 1 L ' GRADE . 0% 1 I I U r SPEED:•w 1, r i rn� MPH I r M w IN I ♦ RESTRICTED SIGHT tr OC:)E Is JI r Y w w + «w F IId1 r ICI�F. I.�T�.e�I�°r �'A D.J'U� r 1�L I+I r�.� u ACCELERATION LANE? NO t,«IUIrIL" ,RADIUS OR TURN ANGLE? NO r.w.«Nr ww w r.LI r w ww wl r wN4w 14•«I«•. N w••ww.rw w•.«..r rw.Iw,rw ...w hl WN w.11w1 wN wr..r.......w«ww r rW♦.••.wN rW w«.W ..... wl...«, 1.... H!.w w.••r. .4•.1 wN w ww «4W_ .•.1 I A ' .♦r.!h. mil H4 w w«Nw w�wN w«h« wN•IIH w«NNI w.ww wN wN'w .w««w rN h4 „1•..•{«r 4•w.N IW i.w,W♦� ••W.«w.rr..W.,.••WM..••ww«rl w««W w 4w•wN h.w .•.♦.N••1 v r rIN r«♦ H ww•rw r.l rN 4•.4 r«w I� � • w w « ♦ . r . « w«I.i w♦f w 1 Iy1r'.JVE: 1 AL 1 Alir 1 AR. 1 I•(L 1 ET 1 BF; I CL 1 CT 1 t :R I DL 1 DT 1 DF: 1 ' . . 1 VOL Y I 2951 / - I 1 857 l 1 ' I 771 M 1 821 1 5 1 1 51 1 I l r� I�. 1 l«l 1 1 1 461 I 1 851 IU I 351 61 I 1 I:J I LANES ! 3 i « 1 i I !, o ' ,• HW wx wr«Nul«{•wN 1•♦N xw Nw Nw NW r4u rw•HN f•,..1••.1 NI..Iw•.IN Ilw wN • .w w.Iw I.w liw xw,«•r♦Nr Mw Ni4 4w•HN rw w1N rw 1««ilw N•w rw w .r Mw rw W4 w« ••wr wN.NH«w r'w♦w w .h 4—W r w h ww i..«N41 N.r 1•—wu..♦r Mw.rl w w '.� STEP 1 RIGHT TURN FROM C /C CR DR ' . 1 CONFLICTING FLOWS w w w�' I �� 1 1 1 CRITICAL GAP = TO = 5r 0 5r 0 SE wS r-oTI NNT I ALw CAPACITY .w M,l e55. 1 829. F't;:H 1 DEMAND MDEMAND = 3 i 6 F'CH1 CAPACITY USED = 4. 094 .724 % I t IMPEDANCE iY:.l•DANCE FAtr+TO1"': = .978 .998 i SHAH ;E"D LANE -- SEE STEP 8 NO SHARED LANE -w RESERVE =~ tl 0„ I YCH !I DELAY a. LOS w N/A I N/A ww N4•NW....w•.w. ♦.•4.»_w« W.wu,.......r«W..w..w«.•♦..♦.y-r.M w«.•H w•...r«r••..«:«rw ih..NI 1.•1.rw 1........ N A.«...w......xr.x.0..w N/« 1•..1'1••1.1•.•1 W..w.W«YN•1•••.1.•11 N.1 Wr.«..w»w.r uus 4«.zN+I.u1.N4 u.a 1411 Wu x+"1..1 N:....1..1iw rN"• j S«f L-:.P 2 4 LIY"r' TURNS `{7:t3M s/1 E11� A�« Ii�I _uyll x FLOWS MH ;,ti 41 �+ ' " 'l-I '.' .. t IONHIL I lw1 1 I Nt3 1 LOWS = MH =«, I 4.)67 M I a) 2. I CRITICAL GAF' = TG = 5.0 I J d E c POTENTIAL CAPACITY Nh2 wr• 828. 827 i F w i DEMAND = I r 1 8 PCH i CAPAC I IY us I 5 tl tl ; 3 % I 1 I MPEDANCI . rAtW"rOr! 4583 3 0 8 ' AVAILABLE RESERVE N $21. �I; P riLL 1 � L �� i A A 5 Ir ' ..h' ,.,�-.s � �.,. k...._...M an..f, -i�.. ... .. .. .. .. ........•�...,.._.�.. ... ..A,..I�t ..,..w.c...,.a.x.�,..... .,....�, . MY _r w« r _r r«i r..wM N.,r r�««r M _..JI.,.N. w..wr wl.wr«r w«.._f ...N.M wn_I. r_M w« . _ Nw_._ _M««.. _ ... N Nw_.._._ _ rw Jr x�•rw W,.� _ ..wM_ r,._.._ _ rl s rEr-' 3 TI°•IRU MOVEMENT 1-���:,OM O/D �`"f` DT . r • c:or4FL.r C-1 r N1. FLOWS' = MT 1:.: 740. r74. V,P1,1 ' «w.(RIT�ICAL GAP _ 're 6.0 .0 SECS 'H , ' POTENT I AL CAP AC I TY = MN3 386. w Ge. PC 1-1 ••• • ' , I MF'f�;.DAN1::1 ADJUSTMENT = M3 = 370 353. P)::1•-1 . DEMAND 0 rC1-1 : r wAlwAh' rY USED N ' • E . 00 . 00 "d ,,• IMPEDANCE FACTOR = P3 , = 1. 001 1 . 001 k;. k. NO SHARED 1...Att.E AVAILABLE RESERVE '' !. 0. P`C1-1 t' �1 DELAY & LOS ? N/A N/A . SHARED LANE WITH LEFT TURN ' , SEE S1 E P , 4 8��AS�.ED •tM1AhaC.. DE1 IA►ID �- 0 r :1 : POTENTIAL �.:AF'ACXTY' M13 O. i . F'►::1rii AVA tLABLE 1 :E 3Err;VE = 171. 0. F'C1.-1 f"• , N/A' DELAY' � 1MN Q 3 -- NIA h�l A I � --++ .r«w w'IW«w NJ Nw wb rw wil Mir Mx.N_ r Jr 1+_rN.li«11v..Ib..rw' M..Mr xIM. wNY J 3/W NNI(11«NJ hN n_.Mi.l NL'IW ettM�irM Mw'r/rn wr Nw Nw L.x! nw n«.rM rw.IM.i Mw IW M.«ill__J�M:N ji11t wu Nnr M".`w�_w.h«w rIN.wM Mrr.IIN nJ w..rw...r M_. 'i�' f TEF�� 4 �.� 1..EF.1„ TURN 'r F OM C/D CL L. CONFL I CT I NI% FLOWS t� MH 745. StV))1-:. y1-1•1 h:RI TI CAL. hiAP = TB , E;a 0 6.0 EEC;; 1 • PC 'rE141 T:CAL CAIw'AC:C TY MN 333. '352. PCH V ' I. ADJUST ( o1h` I 11i 'GuD 1�I�MiE 1�1 366. 828. pl..-1-1 , , NO •SHARED,, LANE DtF„MANI), = 0 PCH .M M -I AVAILABLE ;ESE ;,VE 0. 0 PiC1-1 . . DELAY ; LOS = N/A � N/A I;•' S AREC LANE DEMAND = 0 ..: 1'1 , 1_I AA,t A►,::1 T r •or 31-1 A R1xi1 D LANE 0. 0, 1 J,H r , AVA I LAE LE RESERVE n� ' - O. 0. PCH .DELAY' Z, 1...,08 - ' N/A N/A WITH LEFT, THRU; ;, f,rt:tiHT ' � L SHARED L«A1411: DEMAND MAND = 1,20 J.'.::' 1w'I.:H i• 1«W,:AF(AC I..f or SHARED LANE „� 485.'' 428. PCH 1. I _ L. _ AVA X LABLE PE SERVE -x � 31 w�. 411 . 1-CH DELAY a LOS ' ti • A ,. hr J-FNI rrw--W-J4 -- {NN-3--MJU. iIT/-- w--11 W-N_-FW-,---wr111.1-.Nl7lwr'-------IW------,...Mw--Ywd-iM------iiM_-a.... LOS c VULUME8 g , ,r o r!, L 8 C P-Orii. LEG D • . VEHICLES PER HOUR ' 2686 871. . ';' iNr'..«i f..r w+1 iMK MIM r'YN._{lJM Ja i1.M N.N MIN.MIf W N r.r MJ ilh NJ iNli w«Nlrl ..,yN r4,i JN Mr•NIN rrl Nu.NN/«.N rIN iNx M.li iwj NJ L.ri rN...lr NI«rytM h3i Ny3 Iw W I fbF I.IM{Wi wyr Jr INI.f+iM I..M IINI.Iv.+wr iWl IMII Mii L.N Ltr.«r Wi wi!JN.Ills N+N a.../Yiw iNli JM wW wfi 1i:.i •"IT, V ER 3/e '� , 1 . 1;•I. i I' i i II i �..� I �I ,,.,'fl�... ...rl,.,. I,... ......, ,,.. ���,i•i, 1•I,,.r� .n i. .L.,..v, t r �` II • , $ 41 ® it , •,•.,.: -..,.f ....4.,..'....-,., ., .,-�i.._,r.w—r... sl.,.x.,..i,....:. ...w:. ,. u.. ..,la..... .+r,.a•:..h.M.u•xU ., .x.4.�.u..ar.�.._-.uiL._._ - ,. ..r x,.u.... .. ' _. .,s.,.......Iw..,.....,xlYw.y...✓rtv r ,.. • � , � r «� w7. � � rhr CALCULATION c . • ..m 4—WAY INTERSECTION I CITY: J Iw FT m 11A_ B r DICK I E 1•r.1•: ' _ C hTElSC r:T x CN1 r GrxF r r 111 . AN D LOCUST L A :N«ER NATE: TOTAL TRAFFIC METRO SIZE: 20 y 000 TO 100 y 000 COUNT: PM PEAK TYPE OF CONTROL: STOP [- n.f ��''�yy �yy,'•� •� r h 1 t �.0 I•.•A l 1.O N P L«A KI: 5. APF'F OAC1-1 CODES ARE ' 'D LANE 1 2 w GRADE= b 0% n L � r ' `r su 2 3 1 GRADE= q Ora 1 „ C: ..na .«.yw«.l_.w»«w nxy i”«...N«,»•..Ir»« •w«•• 1 - W»» •.Nx w•». nN.W... ..«•N» n«wx w.Wuwf»"Ny »✓ WN x N» " 1 Iw t • t � ;a't A xW W U« »w U yw Mw.W«y.x•.•»•r yxw w xh y y.y...x✓ n i 1 w »�1 xw w»xW»w•••«x••.W«rw»w f.l.•U«y •. r W w•x».� GRADE= 0 I:J A D u 0%1 f . A Sr-'Er D: 35 Iv11 74'1•1 I,, RESTRICTED s I 'T S. y. M XNOR s'irr:EET ADJUSTMENTS w_ AI;N:►„: 1,w1{;t~:A11i 1't»7N LANE?'"' N : ";, cuF'3 RADIUS OF TURN ANGLE? NO . E. ' � l.».w"..«•wll.•.•.w..W N...:...0 x•.• .—N...I wa..«iWy Wf W"W U«w wN«.1«".w.«w w"W»W"»w..w w: .«w..w»w.+ w.+...r.•..w N.•.w..�.•:..x•+N y.».wx..•.y.+.» w« ..» ».d:•.N..x."»N.«w"✓...r....«...x•.�Iw+u•a Nw.w 1 1"'F 1'?• 1 A t � , 1` ; 1 • ` Wr Nrl":N•••••rr w•.•1y1 w«.y4\.r»w«'«•N xyy\•»U 1«••wU y»U wN wiy�•••wu.1/y w»IUN w»»•y WN«�«Wiy wx✓+•xw Wye w•!WN w n w NW•••yl rr nw W«1.•:•n..xw w n••.•»«ix..iwy ••n•1 WIi 1.••+r•1.1••w 4m••✓••Wil••w wx.••••i»..f 4y»W 4 Nr•WN w•i IyW INx✓x•r I 1 MOVE 1 A . 1 A"r 1� Ar 1 BL 1 B R Iw:L 1="r 1 I GI's. ! DL 1 D•r ! DP '1)?' I VOL 1 �1 1 1_ 1 3'�+'1 �- 1 gfi "..v• 1 �VCIi_ 1 101 '��t"!1' �'"�'� 1 '�.� 1 �.l,�r•� 1 •��.:a.1 i� �.�►�i� � i i ��� i� �:� i'� �1 i �� 1 f, I r 1 �f 1 �y 1' � i 1 1•"'i r r11� 1 1 �I 1 1» 1 1 6 1 S 1 CN!t•1 1 22 1 6 1 t•:!t�:! 1 , • , l``' il. 1 1 r �' 1 1 1 7 ,1., 1 qq 1 LANE ! "'3 1 1 1 1 1 "i•.,IWi W"Nn••w INN 4•x Nw e"r•••••»w W"wx »w WN•r••N xW N•r IIIN N•{�NW yl U U W 1«.NW 1:M w✓i"—•«•1µew»Ix 4W»».wAy UW«N Nw Nw wN.••••w:•NW Uw-"-°-Nw—••x•--µw N•.xw'1••.W4 w«•"-NI"Nw 1•w✓Ix'—NW«W.w»Ny«.•n•✓ix..w nr NW 1 1K! f.«• 1x • - � (�», •1 l y11�/i,1r+•y l L STEP 1 A TURN h fi CM W Di IM:0Ni7LIc rINC =LOW = M" = 499 r 5 4 0 i ,VPH. E. Iw: :I T X I::AL GAP = TO = 5. 0 . t i 5„0 51EW w 1 F c r`Nr A1 "'y ► AI 7 Y — M 1 = 713. 881 . =CH DEMAND 63 3 PC1-1 1 1:A1-IAI,I 'Y USED = xx� 0.e38 4. 844 % 1 IMPEDANCE Et-ACTOR . .940 .988 88 4 SHARED LANE W.. SEE STEP i • NO SHARED LANE w„ 1±M.ESERVE �- 0 �L,�r r11�,�1 N/A w � � 1, ,. - DELAY ai, LOS N/A N A L w44L4Wr1UNWNwr WxwNWNwNWN••••••wI WNrNwNWNwNNWWNIMarNNUI«INNN•WNwy.NW..•ay.U___NWwµNw,"»Uwµ•NU14wNWµNW•:NIN••.•••4nLN•N WNWIIwUWNW"wNi:iµ.:NWN4•Nwwwl rtl••"Wµw"«••1xiL',Nl•i{✓Yy__WrwN:x.•yl:i•.•.y_ 1, STEP 2 4•N L E FW.Ir TUNE PROM ,LNI f A BL At ►w:ONFL I L:1 1"I alwi� PLOWS r1 MN 52 2,, 5.''7. VPH , :l I X+ AL aAP TI; 5.0 Kd e 0 SEi ; . F'01'5,Nr tA1x.. CAr1AC.:ITY = M2 = 1 1 695 6Th► F1Ct-I 1 DEMAND ' I1 �'1►.:H ,1„' 1 Hwy y+ Ne, y x... 7,77, 1. ) N. _ E 11 �11 � V. :4 MPE DAl:CEE rWAc:°roR:, wW.� �� .' "'1 ' ” '�, .99K�' a', 1 I [, ' AVA I L A BL 1E t1:,ESE ;'VF'��•N ',4�1 A 66.5 FIE:1'1 ' DE1«4AY hr I-0 ."-= 1 A A • ., .,.,.,,..i�...»..._,..4+�,..« ,.,,_...,. _ ._.,-.,..�...� ,.k.,,,, .a'.:.,.».. ...r...,.,1...,..�..r_ +u.�.---,...,...... ..Ar...µ..�."-.+tu_...a.w..,µ,..iti-_..............._u1_...-,,......,..a.........,�,.., ..� ... ..a�4.,.x..,.wf �.,,...... _„I,.... Y , NM „ r.. r..r rw r«., r«w ra nw r«wM ww f...f«f MN ww ra.........i ww«..r«I rr www wW i«a wu rJ�w.ww«u.....v ww ww ww Ma.r.wf.,.•..«w.wr««.Mr ur w..wr.....w..r««f...........4�.wr rr � '. r f r wwi w r STEP 3 fI•1RLI MOVEMENT FROM C/D CT DT y CONFLICTING FLOWS w IT = 1105. 1121 . VFH y rI 1I:AL 1:i1 . O = W o o 6.0 SECS IL POTENTIAL CAPACITY MN3 � .�. 223. PCH IMPEDANCE NCE ADJU TMENT = M3 = 214. 209. PCH DEMAND = �y a 6 F":;H CAPACITY. USED 3. 51 2. 69 (a �U IMPEDANCE FAC TOR = P3 = . 977 7 w'9.83 NO C SwA M D LANE uo AVA I LAB L.rE RESERVE= 0. 0. PCH ;�� �-' N/A!'A N/A DELAY w, L..lO. SHAPED LANE WITH LEFT TURN w.i SEE' STET' SHARED LANE DEMAND POTENTIAL h,:AF'A,I:I`r% w M13 == 0. 0. F{i::Fl AVAILABLE RESERVE« = 0. 0. F'(:4•«1 DELAY f,,t LOS =� N/A N/A �.ar STEP 4 . LEFT TURN FROM C:/D CL DL i" .. � :C N F h I , r I N: FLOWS = - 11 �d� � ���w 1 � CRITICAL i3AP = `frig = 6. 0 6. 0 SECS POTENTIAL CAPACITY = MN — 21 7. 203. PCH w. ADJUST FOR IMPEDANCE: 19 170•k PCH NO SHAFTED LANE DEMAND = 0 0 PCH AVAILABLE RESERVE O 00 PCH DELAY a LOS N/A WITH LErT V "Ih'.L t �i SHARED�� W 4 DEMAND k � r : CAPACITY� �w SHARED LANE At . 0. � PCH w 0. PCH AVA I LASLE RESERVE=. 0 0. PCH DELAY n, LO N/A N/A WITH LEFT, THNU,. & RIGHT SHARED LANE DEMAND MAaD . . 2 4 7 � � � � PCH CAPACITY or SHARED LANE , ,, 800. F:'01-I AVA I:LwASL,E F:E SEEF:VI. =- w{.w 239. F'i7.:H DELAY 1,: L.aOwa LO5 C VOLUMES11 F"C)F`. LEG i_' ro".`. LEG D a VEH I CL1 PER HOUR� 240 35t6. ...aww ilwawa—.....MN---rw—rv—«ui--Wwi---.w}«a.wNr.4Ma-{..awwwa-,W«a..:,..www—:.+.la,--w auw+,T ff--ariwN--a:.ra.—a.a(.ws--i..a—iiwwNw««:a—Wr—Warwe.r,--w...WWw— • #I VE141, 2/87 . r ,.Lw..�....a.l..� .�n,,.....e.....-ate. .. Mi v rr FR f�.�-4 • ,. •�"* Uhf"i T i�ih�lAl� ZED,' Ill"Efi,BE+::1"I ON, { �> � { �I TY { :A!_.{M:UI_.AT I ON F"C1F::1'i " ; , , 4-WAY T 1vlTERSEc:wr I o► ! w . , CI..1..Y, T I I iAFlD . 1 ANALYST. D I CF%11 WOEE;.lw.h., :...., .. ', RSECT 18N p' ' REl�'NBLIRG AND 1..«OCUST , . •' I,,., ALTERNATE: TOTAL.« TF.AF"F I�w METRO SIZE:, 20,000 TO 100y 0,00 COUNT: FM PEAF , TYPE OF CONTROL: STOP ' LOCATION PLAN; 1 ' AF'F'ROAC 1-1 CODES ARE i L.A o III: ! � : 4 {�sr�i C .m, l 1 4 H2 ' ^ ., � i' ' RAD E 0"w � " ti i .Wrw . « wIu1 _w wN,rN W ww W «W«wWw 4 wl«ww « 1 wiw«rWw w.0 a l/ A li ww « ti.1«rw W44w wr W4« . r ...r.W...r ! 1 wW rw Nr wrrwJ «w ww NW Nr rr«.«wr....•.. J1..• + $3RADE-t. .0%1 1 1 ' ' �' GRADE= A 0% 1 1 • 1 wW 1 3 r w�.N iI { r I : « �" CODE D I,r 1 ' M I Il']i : STREET ADJUSTMENTS ACCELERATION 'LANE? NO " ,8 " ADCU S OR TURN: ANGLE? NO .. r«µw w.....r r«Iw...;„,.. rJ 4W w _.WI NII wN w..4W 4 N,«rr »w..wl r1l«N1 r.4 M W r.N WµN,.i.w W 11 _.w..rp wN wjf w«. w.«W 41..«w««.rr...li«r.�..«. r...W. w Nw wN«J«W W M w««.w W««.««�r•Y 4w i r rw«w Nw... . • A P F�R • 1 A 1 '1 i` ' •wM« i wN NI wN,w «I.r w..«NI w..r..)µ.J«. N.N4«W«µ.I N r4 WN wN N«I wH«.. « wH rN wN rW. wu rw « rw N i w w. 1 w µ • .NN it NI W4« . wwµ.+ ««.r. rH.Wi. wl.r w1l w.w r+.« w« +.«..w«aw«w.rN V.........4w1 wµ w 1. W . I' I�'0Vt 1 Al_ 1 A;E; L- 1 BCL:r 1 CT� , .1 I R' 01 1 471 491 5321 , 1Fi ! iC?)t i , ". t ,1_' l 1l' i l 301 ' 0 ! .,• 1 p'c:H 1 i L 1 , 1 1 't,34:1• 1 1 1 '1 1 M 81 ' ' 2.�, 1 ' 2,3 1 W �y 1' LANES :" � � �, � �!�J't ��L'J,i �J,..i I � d:«r!r !� � �J 1 • 4.1 1 1 ,Nd I 4' I 1 1 1 :''1'.'n' ,., ' , fNN 411 Nw Yw WM _I.wJW«W..w 4NN Hw 1«NNi..w4 MN wW 1.•n NW N1..rw.1rNW IN�IIw.w..Hf«w4 rw NW wN NW r N....M Jw N14N NIN I.«iN NW ww.NN LrY ww rW wJ rW..... NW.«w rw«irwYw M.w r...Nw 1{wiMw.«r«/:....w.wrw r.r l.... STEP I. R x►11•'•1"r TURN FROM C/ `� ,w.ill ' . ' rl �r. t::ONFL I C:T T N{ FLItWB = MF"i i"1`: 'a '540, 1VPH • i_:k,I T I i..:A L GAF' 7 Ti► �«w .o 5,, 0 8E hy,8 POTILNTTAL ' cAP \CTYY 7 M1I 713„ , 681 . PC!•"I . .• • i:APAC:11 TY UBr:�.TJ 8.838 '4 m 844 'IX IMF'EDAN{w:E F`'AcTQ :'. p ' 4098 ' SHARE) LANE •�— 1 a"r NP o fAr (�J'�� NIN .Ah i r.� DELAY $i, 1JNCJ8 N/A ,', � " iW.:.«W«.:.w iw rNWY WN Yrl wki WY WH WN wY 4r WN 4W'wr wW 1«+VW WN INN NN: i Wl.i•1wN_..w«wN 44.1..•.wN.I..I WN JJi W«4.J wN wJ NWW rr.« M WN wJ 4N.rJ.{:,N JWJ WNN LW:...114114w�4.riN.wJ«IN Uw W«Nw Wr....1 INM F1.µINr wiN_N W.µ ', , 1 'I, , '43-11,4,71,:i Ii.N NW L EL r w� N"«!r` � 1:.–ROM OONFL I C1 I Ni.-.1 17L.IOWS, M1-1 5, “ , 5.4 7 ��+J� ? . lwilr.I T I;,w1Al. L Ai-'` «r� ' N 5 d G` '"'�-;s G � �L+rlw,� • POTENTIAL • CAPA{.�.X TY M2 ! 8 Jw...1 a , 4 J G a 11{l i1 1. ,1 Dr_�NMAND = .. �CAP.A!.`:I TYR',U ED , 7. 77 3. i . 1.h11��'L iC ANC�:l =A��:�r8C, p` r ,9S0 90 A,VA'T LABLt r;, ., RY " t 841 I„ ,H, 665,' pticH, i' • 1,,, , tI I.NAY ;rr �,LO W. ' ,, A ' A ,. !1° i w . I: I;' �•'�' "r.1 w.•rw wW r•r«w rw rl_i•«r«rN r_r« . . .M« rw•NU F..•wu Nw rw.....wN w«w«wl• 1 r 1 r rr w«««......w•w«.w«Y •_.Y w«rw.w. r wu w«w L.N Lr w_r r. ....._«ww Fw.....•r._�_.N�«r«_« N M«_n � STEP 3 "rHRLJ MOVEMENT P I::Q1`1 C/D CT DT :_OI\IF-1..z_►C:1"1 rail:c p«FLOWS, NIT • 110'Z.� 11:,7::1 n 4,�F_'1_••1�y 'GS Iw•I r.I"r Iwl A L1r 'I•N A 1 i ••••' «f'3 '••" 1_,[ 13��f_•t.5 "' »'A .� ,) w/ t ru ..... 2'.,62j3 •'.1•WI FI w i: I"OTCN7 z AL.� Ir:AF A'n:x TY _ Vfha,N, k .fir2 F''wbH IMPEDANCE AD•.:1'I„J5,.:-7'LrI''1EIST M3 = 214. 209. 1-1CH , i• DEMAND = 8 6 F'CH CAPACITY USED = 3.51 2. 69 / IMPEDANCE FACTOR P8 . 977 . 982, 1 NO, SHARED LANE . AVAILABLE R E }EFVN w 0. 0. F « - w g` I / DELAY I,.11 A Y LOS w. N/A 1 J. A l&sSHARED LANE WITH LEFT TURN ° SEE STEP SHARED LANE DEMAND = 71 0 1 II�:H s, POTENTIAL '1 :AF'A'CITY = M13 = 564. 0. F'r.".:I-.1 AVAILABLE " .Cr VE r 493. 0. PCH � . 1 DELAY la; LOS A N/A wN w«.u_uM N_F._.«,.«•_1«L Nw. «.« rw «. Nw.1w xr•Iw•r•r «_:•.r«w«•«««rw NM«w uw wn"••••rN«w r.r._«• wr wu rw ..W...FIW«w»«:_�«N.r••w rw.wti Nw« i uw, .w.•:r Nr wN..r.,. r«.r W F_w.._Nw•1�••Nw Ilw wr STEP 4 LEFT TURN FROM C/D CL DL CONFLICTING FLOWS -'= MH = 1140. 1185. VPH CRITICAL GAP i TI 6. 0 6. 01 SE'w: 1'I POTENTIAL CAPACITY MN = 21 203 FRiM• °I 1' " �: k u: :tJ n w•1` li i ADJUST FOR IMPEDANCE: 193. 174. F'CH NO SHARED LANE DEMAND = 176 0 F'CH i AVAILABLE RESERVE i 17. O. F'CH i DELrAY & LOS "— E N/A 1. 1 . ,- I I ' n J U • u SHARED LANE DEMAND ' E'I�:!-I �` CAPACITY OF SHARED LANE = O p ' G k ar'CH AVAILABLE rE SE FV E 0. 0. F r DELAY & LOS = N/A Irl/ l A 1 a WITH LEFT, THRU, fir RIGHT SHARED LANE DEMAND - 0 61 1-'0H , CAPACITY Or SHARED LANE = 0 300. 'CH • •,{ tiL !yd 1h R�� 28I.. �R+"+/� �A'�A 1I:�Ar IrICN r1E.wl:�r'1�Il�. O M .•sir,�n 1 rIH DELAY o, LOS = N/A C • • I yr'w.�_r_r•W Llr Fw rM rw Mr w J WM.....uw Nfi NM INw 1 Wr«•"•111•Yw Nw Nw«w rw F.N rM wr I•M r..l IN"NM wr wu W_NM«w rlr wL w1«w"•_.,�w.«w w w4 Iwl wd wr:NM«_Niu Gr.wN«w Nw IIM I.:N Uw M_•r..r«1 N.r NN:.r wN•'-uuµW wN{•.",' �'' LOS C VOLUMES; EOR LEG C I FOR LEE' D 1 JE� �t_ w w,r HOUR I »,�, p 350. I . ` - I..r uM w11:1«.rM«w wu 1..1.MN W WrN.wF 1.Ni w«wN wN NNY IN1�wN N.N,wN wF M•i NM wu I.LI'wN W W,wu 4LU�,I.s.wN wµrN.n.1 w Mll M1f M••N.11rd+...1 L.N YLIi MµM./Mu L�.N WN Lw wN Nw N.N iy:1w uLA jnw r.N N•..L..Mr Lw'«w F...rM wN Ww.w1 uu•J~•Ir1Y W 11 L_N:..1::« Y el.J/l TT i I . I I ti I I r ir V • • 1• SI GCAP ANALYSIS ON STORAGE LENGTH 1 INTERSECTION : GREENBURG AND MAF LEL.Et x"-- SCENARIO: TOTAL TRAFFIC PM PEAT-:. APPROACH : SOUTH 8O1JND THROUGH VPH = 694 CL = '`9PJ I.,P1H-'I -- 131" .•« 1 = (VPH/CPH) (2. 0) (1-1.11/C) (25FT PER VEHICLE) a ■ tint I N Y w « 1 FEET • I w i ,, , L , , , 1 • , i 1 ,, , ,, , .„ I , ;. . ,.. •••• , ,, ,,, • ..,,„..,,., ,,,, ., , ..... . A • • • • „ N ,, -.... i ... • ' bt GCAP ANALYSIS STORAGE• A» LENGTH, i INTERSECTION n GREI NBURG AND MAPLrELEAC" SCENARIO; Tx"1TAL_! TRAFFIC' PM PEAK 'APPROACH p NORTHBOUND L µF' TURN I . • VF'hf 994 " , • ti CL CPH — tZl i `fin _ i n • • , ..n — is VFH, :FH) (2. 0) (1.-i /i ') (25FNI" PER VE;H I nLn.F'm) ' Y •rw« r +•» r ur N•r,••r»w M irw 1 n wx x w»Irw rru!u«r•r».IMM u xN Irw rNw•»N w.n rw Nut xr»,w»w»N1N/rnr 1•w n wn Nw•Nrr Iw uW 1 14f F L = 95 FEET I i • I p , i • I E; i I I 11• • , , , ,f • , • ,, i .. • , , , , ,,.., ,.., ,, , , , ,,,,, , , • ,, i, . , , , , , i, ,, . , , , , , , . 1 , , , I, , . 11 , ,• , , , , , ,, , , , , ,,,, , , , , , , , HH • !, . ,. ln' r I ''I • a. ,' . • !j S I t:CAF' ANALYSIS ON STORAGE LENGTH . ,.. I NITER`.$:E�,:1"I ON d +:F::EEi`IBUR'i AND tMLAF'LELEAF'' SCENARIO: TOTAL TRAFFIC PM PEAK APPROACH n WESTBOUND LEFT TURN VPH r : CL GT 1 11. 8 L. = (VPH/C:PH) (2.0) (1 t /'I') (2 5FT PER VEHICLE) , L,: .. 4 28 FEE" _ • K • I I • I I I . r • ,' I I � �� a „ • • . r r I I .. I I i ■ riry • i`` SI GCAF' ANALYSIS ON STORAGE LENGTH INTERSECTION : GREENBURG AND HWY 217 NRAMµ t '4f. SCENARIO: TOTAL TRAFFIC 'M PEAK I` APPROACH H s SOUTHBOUND THROUGH VF'H — 1 238 1,4'y GT = 46 • N "^ y et C P H 1 1 - r ' rT 'E VEHICLE.) , L w_ �f'�1°�H/�w.F: x d t 1} �. i.�rr, /,w) ( , ♦ ,IA .�w 111u I•w Wr i!w uW u+.uw IUU wY uw Mw Iu!•Uw 1!w.u,1 rfr,rui Nw flw Mw�rw Illr wU rW IM+H.�Uw uw wl:l w1r WM Hw lu+ww Uw Ww wu Uw 41.1 wu 1«w.w.n wu Uw r=' 3'7B � I«,E... 1 t Y�. 1 •. Ore . i i 1 • y i 33 1 , 1 , 1 , , 1 II 1 1 I I ' I I � 1 ,, , 1 , i 1 a 1 I u I . p n , . • . , . . . . . • . . • . . , • ., , •' . . . . , . . . • . , . . • • .. , . • . • • • •. .. t . ,. . . . . • , . . . . .. . , •, . . , . .. • , , .. , ...., — " • •r . . . /. . . , . !#, . . ,. . , .' . • . . . . . , . . . , • , , . • • . . . . o• . . , . . . . • . . . . . , . . ,p• • .. • ., . • ,. . . . . . , • . • :..:::,.. , , , , 1 „ , . ...,, , , .,.....,...................:. ;.,..,_.. IATED , , .,,.•••••••• ...••••• ' '' .... ' ••••••:•.e '''''..;..• . ' • , . , ! • • • ,.. ,,....'..11.,..•:Pr .., . , :d..,..';•:',"'...,..•.......b . , I D ., . .. , -:,,,.............,,:. , ...,,,,,, . ,,...... ••" ' e 1.4(;:ii: , . • lit , ..,1::;17,.....,ii,/,' 4 • .. , . . , 8c ‘, , :.„.:...,.., :.....„.,....,...,,,,.. 1 ,,.............:_Ai . , . 1 , . , ■ ' I...0:•..•...•:.: 4,'...-,r , .1 ...,....... Fifia . . . .:.,..,,,.;.,,,,;.;•............../.„;,....., ...„,„;.............. .Z...-- ,' ,..,,,,,.. LA N .., ........:•,..4.3/:-,...,.......„::. , , 04.1111,,,, . . , ........: 4,,,, , . • , -44s2.*. ',or& . • ,11:1* . . . ' • • , e,., . . . , , . , . . , • , .. . , . , ,. . . , , . . , ,. . . , . , . , , . , . • ' , , , ., - . . ,.. . , , 1. , . . , . . i . APPENDIX . . . ... , . . . L, . .. ,.... • . ; . . .. • • • , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . , . . , , . . • , • . . . . . • . , .. ,,. PASSER . . , . , . . . , . . . . .. . . , , . , . • . . , , , , • • . . .,• . • • ,, , 1, . ., ANALYSIS .. , . . . . . • „, . . . . 1: . . . . . . . , . , . . . .. , .. • . . . . • . . • .1 . . ,., . . . , . . , .. , . . .. . . .• . . . . . . . . , . . • ,. ; • . . .. . . . . . , . . • . ••• 1 . . . ., . , , . . ,. . . . , . 1 , ,.,• . ,. . . . .1. . . . • .. , . • , . . ,• . . . . ” . . • . , . . . . , . . •,, , ,:.'• • . . . ,. . . , . • . , ...„ , . . , . , , . , . l'. .. , . , . ,, , , • i, , . , ,.., , . , . . . . , .. , . . , , , , , • , ' I. 1 . ., • • .. • -'',:ii4:, , . , . t , ,■E. . . TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PASSER2 MULTIPHASE ARTERIAL PROGRESSION - 145101 3.0 JULY 1986 , .r: PASSER II-84 ""** INTERSECTION 1 MAPLELEAF OFFSET= .0 SECONDS, .0 `l. ARTERIAL PHASE. SEQUENCE IS LEADING GREE1! CROSS STREET PHASE SEQUENCE IS LEADING GREEN ARTERIAL CROSS STREET MOVEMENTS 2+5 2+8 1+6 TOTAL 3+8 4+8 4+7 TOTAL ,�., GREEN TIME (SECS) 38.0 ,0 2.7.9 65.9 34,1 ,0 10,0 44.1 i. GREEN TIME (%) 34,5 .0 25.4 59,9 31.0 .0 9.1 40.1 �fl v/C DELAY PROB. MIN MOVEMENT RATIO TOTAL AVERAGE OF QUEUE STOPS DELAY (%) (LOS) (VEH-HR) '(SEC/VEH)(LOSS) CLEAR,(X) (VEH/HR)(%) CYCLE 11°, M1• NB THRU . 91 (E) 7.46 54.6 (E) 47 429. ( 87) ` LEFT : 51 (A) 4.42 31.7 (C) 100 373, ( 74) C' SB THRU ; 91. (E) 8.32 43.2 (D) 54 431. ( 62) - LEFT 9 (A) .33 34.4 (D) 100 25. ( 73) ,r EB THRU e 18 (A) .21, 49.8 (D) 100 13, ( 88) 1c • , LEFT : 42 (A) .50 52.9 (E) 97 30. (' 89) WB THRU ; 8 (A) .21 29.6 (C) 100 17. ( 68) LEFT ; 90 (E) 10.97 50.0 (D) 59 689. ( 87) Rf NODE 1 ; 91 (MAX) 32.42 45.1 • ... 2008. ( 7a. 110 t r d, *** INTERSECTION 2 HWY 217 NRAM OFFSET 13.4 SECONDS, 12.2 % 111. ARTERIAL PHASE SEQUENCE IS THROUGH MOVEMENTS FIRST CROSS STREET PHASE SEQUENCE IS LEADING GREEN IL ARTERIAL CROSS STREET MOVEMENTS 2+6 2+5 1+5 TOTAL 8+e 4+8 4+7 TOTAL GREEN TIME (SECS) 46.6 18.4 ,0 65.0 45.0 .0 .0 45.0 1. GREEN TIME (%) 42.4 16.7 .0 59.1 40,9 .0 .0 40,9 U/ DELAY Y �1 PROB. MIN MOVEMENT RATIO ^TOTAL AVERASE ~" OF QUEUE STOPS DELAY EH)(LOS) CLEAR.(X) (VEH/HR)(Y) CYCLE r: y) (LOS) (vEH HP) (SEC/VEH)(LOS) __r.r Ww.{rJL" ' Jrw.i..f:l�i.lr_ul{...i.L L..li tiir Lu Yi' 'LJ • i._ 7wJwr ' f.' . NB THRU 61 (B) 1.09 7,6 (B) 99 122. ( 24) h ) �' ". 3. �� �,13, 6 ��� 8� 6. � CD) � 80 � �� � BS. C 90) LEFT � �9�, �(E 7 � 1 SO THRU ; 9! (E) 30 38.7 ( 62 988, ( 79) WO THRU 98 (E) 7.81 54.1 �(E) 89 453, C 87) �' LEFT 87 (A) 1.44 25,3 (C) 100 135. ( 66) NODE 2 93 (MAX) 29.40 38.2 1978. C 70) 120 tr i�� , • . Jnre -.J.4.):.i.•.-a,-r....�.6s..w.-,...«vl. r'4. r. ...+aA...,.,.K..r,.r--..r«.-,a...4.._..r.,. r_..._.. _.... ... .. - - , TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION r PASSER2 MULTIPHASE ARTERIAL PROGRESSION - 145101 3.0 JULY 1986 PASSER 11-84 it ****• INTERSECTION 3 HWY 217 SRAM OFFSET=107.0 SECONDS, 97.3 ARTERIAL PHASE SEQUENCE IS LAGGING GREEN CROSS STREET PHASE SEQUENCE IS LAGGING GREEN ARTERIAL CROSS STREET IIMOVEMENTS 1+6 2+6 2+5 TOTAL 4+7 4+8 3+8 TOTAL GREEN TIME (SECS) 27.7 43,5 .0 71.2 38.8 .0 .0 38.8 GREEN TIME (/r) 25,2 35.5 .0 64.7 35.3 .0 .0 35,3 V/C --- DELAY -- PROS. MIN , � MOVEMENT RATIO TOTAL AVERAGE OF QUEUE STOPS DELAY (%) (LOS) (VEH-HR) (SEC/VEH)(LOS) CLEAR.(%) (VEH/HR)(%) CYCLE • NB THRU ; 94 (E) 5.66 40,4 (D) 36 234. ( 46) SB THRU : 34 (A) .91 10.6 (B) 100 137. ( 45) LEFT ; 94 (E) 11.00 61,4 (E) 39 575. ( 59) E8 THRU : 52 (A) 2,16 31.8 (C) 100 182. ( 74) •. LEFT : 93 (E) 7.38 60.1 (E). 36 389, ( 88) NODE 3 i 94 (MAX) 27.10 45.5 1516. ( 71) 120 by *** PASSER II-94 BEST SOLUTION SUMMARY - TOTAL SYSTEM PERFORMANCE *** E FFI CI EN CY VERSUS CYCLE LENUTH • CYCLE LENGTH EFFICIENCY trr. 90 .30 i.. 100 •30 BEST SOLUTION 110 .30 BAND A WIDTH (SECS) 38 28 EFFICIENCY . .30 SPEED (MPH) 30 30 ATTAINAtilLITY t 1.00 I TOTAL AVERAGE TOTAL FUEL MAX MIN PERFORMANCE C�E pT MEASURES VEHICLES bELAY DELAY STOPS CONSUMPTION CYCLE (VEH/HR) (VEH-HR) (SEC/VEH) (VEHIHR)(%) (GAL/MR) (SEC) : i •, sir - r�rt-r•e.i.il ir r'.14'•1.!'i•r r..iL..6r rirL w. riw i.a'+r rriwl:LL•:rr�:Y lw r.r{riq Terri KrirJr i ', ' It TOTAL 1409.E 87.9 42.7 5402.5( 78) 1018.5 , 120 frrJ K ' • r , t 1{ . ..:..,....,.» .,._•................1aJl ...... -{k ., �....S..A...,J :TEXAS DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT QF HIGHWAYS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ,.' PASSEI2 MULTIPHASE ARTERIAL PROGRESSION 145101 3,0 JULY 1586 , ' PASSER 11-84 1, TIME..SPACE DIAGRAM FOR„ i GREENBURG ROAD . TIGARD DISTRICT , RUN NUMBER 3 031/2/8/ CYCLE LENGTH 110 i p HWY 217 GRAM 0 1 1.0 9 7,3 ** �� . 1 y ', HWY 217 WRAM .* ., 1 , 1 S,4S 12;2'/ * —_—_----_--++++++ - • ++++++ �, d„ , [7'. ' • : , , , , , , , , , , 1 1 µ A MAPL LEAS t 0S I t 0% +*+++++++++++++ +++++++++++++-,w:.a_—w—. A "A" BAND S BAND , 3 a. ,,W MPH 31� MP�f 38 SECONDS 28 SECONDS ��.. NE?, +f+ BOTH LEFTS (135) +++ LEADING GREEN (2+5)' -= S�UTH THRUS (2+6) --. LAGGING GREEN (1+6y l'., $GALES; HDR I ZUNTAL i INCH = 80 SECONDS (1.INCH 10 CHAEAC`TERS) , , E. VERTICAL - 1 INCH, 200 FEET (1, INCH— G LINES) 1 . a y 0 "�, C SEE GRADING PLAN SHEET Cl 3 r 'L 0 C U, S T �R I O p �� a p Q't; J,n ��erov' I t �� I �, 1421 5Pn 'S B 0'"0" 339,00 1.+,.'..'�.'..'.,• .~ 10�•�' F • v v.,. I t !j I ,.1 1 51,15$1 P'0''1 ,", ,a. • MVO 4. 135f 9PA:H5 0 .31 S'"0" 2M 1 0 �� 12Co i 1 Y w. a:,' I I,V2RIFM SPAC" ,e+-0f 30'0 " 9,4 I' �1T-T1 1 111 I I I I I I I(11�I I 1 11111 L .... '' �', ...... w 11 s 1111111/111111 I1 (II1IU1� �iI ( -'* I ± , ,, PR r, ;...!1 /t. . man � 1rt'CJ a :4 p"l� I ... . 0 ,, 15,a1ni5s-o•''»o4 2 A fl : .,EXISTING 1 I �, $e1:1'A g•... , gl • . ' � � - BU S , LI NCOLN i • 1 BUILDING 0 I N G ��`►'t �THREE , m I: j ''''''''...%'4'''' ,a'4'• 20';?; _ �' f" tEXISTING) �! ,, 04 `tg',0- '". g ven F +s 1 I "' 1 c—a a E x +, � ye be a' �,nn�' � r - _ ' I' ` _ .1. ,'1 1 = ;. L'.fl\ 0 L N , , ,"'t . , ✓ 6 $ I . 1 , % ?F ;; t ) m '� n n S 1 • 1 .x7f i ail $ ii �n r,E5� .. u , 81 ■ 1 y� : D L1 • - �111I1if{1�f1f1- 4_ ' _ 1 ` 0, • 1 i . V In 9 y((�{ i I _ _1, +H....0 � etm _ t i 61 1' . -4, 1 r \ 5.; . Ci-) ; rt s LINCOLN � - ! _ .w J _.w - 1 •1 ( X#ST#t'Gt , ', 1, �� . , 1 . , " ----s.P2 of ialt,.0 A.,- .w ''"w,.,, 7 I N w j_—__. 1 el er i0oo N 7 1 I G 1 CJ _ ,� -1°1411-T---_ �� g ,4., [ : . : _\ �- ' %, EXISTING ?� \; PARKING _.� � ...Va , 1 PARKING x .ST z STRUCTURE STRUCTURE s I 0 I N 1/4. ,\\\.:),,,.,.. ___E. ,,fi s H \ . P '' 1'`-. 1 in;i.i1 r,.S oIT.--"'"' __w.-.' _,w.,, i , . • ...._,. '.{ ,��,_.��''y"��' yp' /�7hfi'Mp� y(�� p •i r n""N, 61,,' �' /1. A t�,.,"" L:1:0,1 f'' P —1 1'J' C,J"!«"'1',4 w+�tr+: r/,AU.r�,.u,l A 6,4,1..4'' ,,! ir'.. ,I. 1 . 4),::::-1-12' . W M1 g J k' SM anrr•I,'f'7 tt y, ! /:'',r, ',... 1�4/',,e l y#.'w" .' r,7�,(Y} ry L�ti fW� U)F'i P'�' � 't8, ��d�. v,.f,,,� 0 fi a , . # . / 1, I w ' I K a b J, , , , .. YT +f' WF' p .u,y i ¢.x ,1 v,+pARe.y't �+a` � wd'° 5 I ,�q ar G, � 11!¢/p� 6 F,. K��� F, . 'k'f,, ,mow' 'r' ''11' ' JN '4 '',dy Y '� a 'r ) ! Q,40 1 k 4, 1,, 'i t',:lid,;" r>%,w 0.,,,' 'J of , a VrtuwF� 4u A �,N' T ..'Ma >sI4N `' . •r...0 4. i' w 4 I ', ''' • a L I f d ' I ,� , i I i , Q ., . • „ • ,' • . . • . . . , . ., 1 •', k. . . , • ,,' • . . . • . ' 1 ,..,.( 61 ,,,i6k« 1 . 1 • . • «I , . •' « , . • ,,,, ,, . , . . • . . , , ••• t , • . t 1 ., '•'"' .,,,, ' . „ ', . 1 , ,, , klillil.2% Ai '' '1 '4 , . . ., ,A 44e• *,• ''' ' • ''''' • ' ,a,. ,,„ . . , , „,,,,.,,,„,,„..,,,,t',,,,,',',,,I,',,,',trvs,..,:it•;•,',41t . , •.il,;4,,, , . • 1 ' ,•,',. ,..koly'','" t, ' • ..,,,r.,t,,•,,,T;,,-,„:,,,,,,,A,,,,,•, . I I' • 0,iii.1:,,, ,,,,,.• .,:Of ' , ' . .,.0, ;,, ,.:1•1,41,r i., ' ' ' ' I.:i',:i.ltit'lt.4". .,,/,,,;,,,',,,,,',,,'-,,,;"4;.404,41",."1.,a,vt,"1,,,,,,,,fe,,,,,,,,,,,,,;F,*;•,,,t,;‘,4'.4,.,,,A.001,,,,,,,,:',,,,n,,,,H,,',1,.,,,,,,,i,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„4.,yx,,,,,,,:t1„,.,:.,,qiit!,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,, • 'T, . '?:,'',...',14,', ''0'' . ,'. ' • ''..*-''“•'--- • ''-'"' •t''''',,t1,14•0•':''''',•,'`,"•,;',',•:''f:',1,'•,,,t,'l'',,',:t•,r',"r,,;••'',',..T; '• • ...,:■•.,4•.''''''''-'';,,,■:, .—ir--,,. .‘.•31,... ' . *(4g4-'1111',x, i,p i s ',.• -: ,. - 4''''.1,....•'i'•'-'...;.••••.,t''';''',..1,•-. r.ii! i',4;•,:..„•t'r4,',.",•''L's'",'t"''k't,,i,';',.'it'',,o, . ,, •,. ., ''' • . iti',.) r ob,let "tri,.,°1,011"'Phlwol , ,,,,t",,',,,,4,p.,-Ap;,..r,•.^.^,,,,, ,,,,, 1,,4,.,,:,',..,• w ,, 41,..,,'..,6%,,..',.t" .,'''',•," , ,,,,,, ,,;141,,,,:■;,,...,.,,,,~,,,,,,%.,..,,,"0.fr. ■A"'.1.:1*"'16.' ','''''''''',1;''''''''''''''f'4''''''''''''''''''I'i` ' ., 1';;;" ,,,,.1 ',,,,,,,,,,,,tl,,,i,;;_i,,,..,4441.:,,,,K.'t,....*r,:kg.7,it?1,.,, ,;41',. ''''''44,:ii,;;.,;,,,,t,i ',Z.T. ,t t tid,..,h^*,-7 ,1,1,,A,t.i"" "„f,:wi..,•,',:",,,`,.'',,,i,,,.*,, ,,' '4.,..v,,,,,tr'41,0,4,,,.'' , • ..-.• '4-,14,•lit.•,„'",li',i,, ill:AP.;,i'l.,,,.;;,,,,'L.:,',•;,.tc.,,..;,,,,`•:',,,,r,..`',•/2.1.:?,j;•,,,,jr,,,':,•,,,.1,,,•,,,t,....i., '• i:.'•,;••6 .1,''ki ''" '•*, ''-• "... . .' ."' ' .' • •' •4;. ,,,,,.,,,.),I..,.,„ .,'1 t,i,,)•,i,t'l,',,r,?,-1,,,,";"Pt ,,",■,''0 1,.,t,....,it■';',4';,,t.' ■,,,,4`e ;ii>,‘4.„,..*,;,,,I,M'pf..,0".? 'ii,,,,,,,,'4,4:., 't,',,,j9,I.„:',.,,,i,,,,,',,,i,,,ttilvtv it,,';,•?",,' '1,•41V" !,,,1 • , i,■:‘,7"1,,,,,,,.,,'.,,,,...),,,,',4,' , , ,'•,,",_,'s.„,','r. ,,.i.,....,.,F... ' ...Cr),•',,,''.I•rI'l,f..■%.1■1,'."Ntif,■,'` . • , ,t,4,.,,,r 6,,,,,., ,„ .,,,,,,,,,,,,,„?,,,',,,;,,,i4.;4,,,,,0,...,,'•;:,«i';',",,,,'"'",,,,,664'6'4"«.41.,''',1«,.''',04,;',14;10,6'4,',0i1:64`. , «,,,'„_;',,,,,,i,,'' t,', .,,,, . • l ,,,,,, ,,,,t/ ,,,,.:6,';,41J,""$'',,,?''),',l,'.''.'",;4',',•'"4,''''''''?•;7'/1.6 4'",,,,(.6''■"''''.•;'''',';i,..,',4,?K,,•,42",;.,...'4,:f.l'';''''.”610,1"11p." ,,,," • 4 i, „," ''' , ' ' ''''" ' '' ','t.,,,..'..2...,,'"li.,1'■'';',,,t.,r,' 1,,Ii`,.■';.,..t+' ", '..'..'*'.. '•,,,:'!„:11'11,,'', '1 1,.:,l,' • ' .„ ,,, , - t'•At,"`1•1,,,\,;'• Vic•Ir''', , r•., ,,#,4r,,,,,,,,,,•,,,,tri,1(•,..,,,•",,,,,,t,tr:,.• 1,,',,,,,,,, 'i I i 'I I'I''''''!....'11?:''''4.,*I01'474'411`..•Il'o*..;,,'74tii,:'..!,./''.' 1.. ::*,;'11 1 I I l'■ . ' r 'I I'•I' '''' .''I'',...,,1/1' I yl.'''i t' ' r''r ''.I.ti,. .,,,,t,..-,,,,, ..,) .10,...,,,,.•, ,..,,,,,,;.,.,.i',',,,•,,,,i;,,,;:,:F,'iti,,,,,.,4, , , , ;, ,..„,„, :„.„.,,,..,,.. ,,,,,,, , , , ,, 9,I,.,' ,,,,,,folI,,,•,,,p.-rwt1,,,I, ,,.ilt f.,k,,o,• ,,,''.1.,,,'.'.1,-4; ' ..' 4,±4,1 ,',',., ''''':',:'"-;",‘. ,J,'',,,,t.' '1., ,,,''',4■::::::+14:',,V:',,"?4',',..L4:.4,,,A";;;, ' ft -.; ;;;:+:;:. ',,,f.,,,,,,!1+,,. ' . --'',... '''''7'',ri,,:i1,,,Pii'4.1:,:,,,;`,.?'",t14.i,,,;;',■''1 ;,..; ,,''.'.4,, „.'7,'I''',.';'' ■ .. ,,,.. , ,, , , ' , . 1,.■ '. ,,", ,,,i'' ;,,,',ir'',1':,', . . ,'. ,...lAt"..1( ' l'it',,,,,.,3,1Y4',',,i,iitl,114,,,,;'-' ,,I1P1,1,,'Iv,',;It.,,'e,,;,,,,i,t'f,'(,i, * ,- ..,1''1 ' '4 ',..,.;,'.. * _ ., t ,f,,,' r 1 i ■ 1 1 , 1 , ., • ' 1 1 1 1 . . i . , . . . , • ' . . , „ ,,,../ i ", •* 1 ' . , . ,• . • fr;)..I 1,.., .1,,i,,:,, ,,,,,,;:„0, t ,, .',,, „, , , b. f' .1' '4 ' • . ,*i ”'t., ,1,.;;„,,,.. 4 N,....t.`,:".ir,,r.' '''''.'"■'', , 1....",..4 4/144i.r. ., ::, , .0 1,, . . t- , , '.1 , ,,,,..i.4,, ,,..,.,.%',,.1:.•-.'",,,,,..„, ,"',„".i 6, „, ' . ' LEASt• , , ' ' ,. • • . • , . _ . .. l'i''•‘• II -4*. ..lt,:,•ip , • • , • isiil:i.,' 1, • ,• , -• . ,, . , . " ' 41'''t'it,,,i"I'',.'•0'it....:,,J,,:,..,-4,...f....,,,,.....,,.. , *1.4,. ,, .. ' ,,t ,,,,,,,.,,,,,„„.1,,,..ki...,„;,,,-,..t-,;,t LNG ,t, ,''-'-, ■ . , ' , LINC° 4, . , ' . . • , . , ,,,,,tive,,',1,1,05 ,, ,‘,...%,'. ;,,.., .,4.•, ' . •.. ,..0,.1e4)."),.4 k , ' ., .,....''. ', ‘ , , . , . . • .:' ''''.'''''.:,'...r:'''..1'*,'1::'''.,'",,.:;..1*..,;.:1;:,4■'''',71,,..'r'''',;'41M*.);''','Ii".§1;h1,r,:ti:/;',,t','''''''''''''''1'.''j r .. „,:i” ''"• , ... . • 1 •,,,,,„t x",,,,'e.tk•.,,trili-'.•,,,'.tr 1',A,"•,,,,,%""1.,t`rsi.tilt .•'' , ',,,,,.5'1 *, 1.;.::,„i,' ,.;'i..,,',""h ;41.'1,,,,,,,1,,,0 E,.•,'.',,,'A.ct;t,,,,,,,,,:f.L.f"''' • , .. " ',4 ' , ,■!,;',•. " r''. .i'''''''').''. .: .:' ' " • , , . • . „,,,41. • • „ .,,, ,, , , ,,,,■',.. ....,,,....,p, • .,,,, --,,„,,,.,,„ ,,,,,,t...,••.•,..1,.'.". • . ., .,,,..,_„;, .4)Y 1 .", .',.''! ,.'. ..',t.'.let,',',r,,,.,',,.,'1,;,14,T,v.,','.,:,„!:*.,■ a,''1",',,'',:'A,,A,•'•'."' • •' . . '.'',:«-• 'r 14 ' ' '.' A.,09."''';'' ' 6 ' , r'''.'",,I,''.•..'0,;■""-,.,,',6, ,),,,,«ii,t, 1 . ' • • . . . . . , • ' • . ..'. , ... ''' '.4.' ' '....i..-.44........-..--r,..........:.'.....,...«.—..W.' — -,',,.66''''.'• 'I'''' ,• • ' • , I I I I I I I • ■ . . 1 I . t * ' . . • . r ;• I .. • y ' I , • • r, , • , . . • ! w. .,.,,..r-•.»......_,. w..».*iu�..4..a.�»...ct.:...=i�c«..«d,=..,.-,utm.-.,..,t�.ati»....-„._.....,...».,.M..,r...,�.,--.�.,ma,. ,� o....:v.;.aJ.a. .».i....A......,. �.....,....,�...�.«,....,..,...«.....Jo-;..:u:.«..::J::..4.+:Jo.,w.«N:'.,w:wAa:.a.M.,.r u,,..,a--.w.,.-,.„,,.,.4:.._:.,:.u....,:...�:1_.,,�":..Y,i.,.,..xr,,:s.1..:...n...t.._lr,.M1-N.».-,.:a,'.1J.n..w,.�.l,a:..,.-.L...:.A.»�..,w 1_.�....,-,...;.' I • i I , , i• r yf.R r,+iu•'�C.n..-f++�,.+•nH•Wrt,A _ iJ ',yry?iufiMiMGS'.!NWk,xut.w.. • ” -- 11 lI r , tl r � try ,r f� v i, I y R d•. `� # ', � fi '11,,4• L S `y €I• ��I1' q-.,` 1 a� ,Gy Y /1`� iS '471, }4� ! . rif '."9 o' � }T.��t i',°V�E11 µµyy }�.'tw I'"WM ll M �' , 1 •.� 'fi F I �, .. . 1 { t'��F T k 5T y �..fi'� a Ih 11 1 V- '1 �` 1 t 1 x� ,i M 1 1 Y A �f J ry Y r'Y: J .'r�•• 1 ro✓ Kr4p11 { ,57 N { I J ' "U.x�r w y' t I,M tV,,,#Fr11 i r++'r,1,_°*,>4 ,,,1*• y.• w k' br ';' 1'''`''''''''. ,' & 7w Ya �1�9I � 7px � �,! MJ„^�.1 2 hi AL �1 I. 111 tM• U,d vnNVi1F• A r�r �_ 4'r f t •. M` ,b v WW.,lr.r. 4 "{7R• .,i,.ar 'A. F 1 �.ry"' thC .� •• 4 a N ', ,, �� -, .F7 d 1. ,x1K^Sv+"f+,.•r,+frro -i '�'�4:. "ChA,a.� t�.,t,.,'..•, h. ' � r�� o- 1 LF If(w1jS7fu t j� :� t 1 ti� 3714:,:"d, �, i �, " ',`1�-`,r y r4rr,'IyN+` tyi,lrt,. ",,'• I ' ,• 1, w. 7 1 sr, t�� , i , •„ 1 f,, da e y Y z' , 1 0••,.0 v !•{r•,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,••••S'� )) f 711 4 ,•••„,r,,,,,,;,•,,•7 4 '4 it V, r[tir t ti(t }y 1 t� rl J'1 .1 u,Pt< r r,, ty� fd 4 4 k r JN'f'y{!1 i''t lfi t -%f+r•',v'�� wy ' ��Ir iii r t4 i4rkit Y rid i t"oy y��X47 , 4n�iyd_ 4h t hA ;Fi7 ' , t,W i} },� n 1 c,l 1.,it� t€H i� 1 145+`✓'? F w •,1,...,.t fa r� ti t+"`�1 i7t•1 'd:dtL 4�,,x Tiff t,IF i 4, , ,'4,' ,r t k ?b,i 1 o,',,,•,,,,,14.. ,,63 7 ,11ht _ .•` "M1 i4ij �a�7�'`x, 4i i ` 4•t ,I��t 1'hJ lye yir i1�1y4; ul Aif tll ppj r{ft tit stir �II. • ei '( i,, y' aq iIr F t e 4 ; ,p t., f r , n, �tl y i tr1 fi,,,4 t,ii,,a' It V �i� kl liI ,4 P 1 ,� 4ia.{ 1;'' i 4��,°�ch4.9 `tJ � ,r''W1}1aM� a rye J`IY dam,, t bV7',i', �Obr }t,� ,')' y-, ,I` t ! tr, lrv,„1.,v 1 iP1t t,, �,H It - X }t dt I t r it ,,!..14,,,,,,1".,1� rt 1 4 ,"1 ',1 4 o,{.rt. 4 1 ii 111'( i tl ',.y fx L y,,73t1� i 1' b+tti, �,iy M�yipa i! gal yQ t � t,:�7 lit 1 1 f11 4 IV t I t ,Jl , w 4P t-.,�' iw 1�Soh,�� �xwf tt ,a7 '�- 7 ,11 "iW ti ytny lf,1 r5 4 41 t7 tyll , fE! l� l< S iot j C�IItS al�rh�44 �y e ei t` }?4 rtl,ay allir4 Iy j�„pi Tl tit of ^ I �� �.r l d SSt,}u d�dy t r n '�1JhS,lSi 4� Cl, w! r ' 741>:. L4..li 1,:1 In h•.'• c•. .t k ".•!v r' S +�.t ,•re t S ,,, • • • • •I i . � � . , • 1 fr I nq rII I � 11' „tay ., .' [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing]