Loading...
SDR89-07 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. i<t y' •to' .r 1 p ' ` 1 ''.'*';'''''''1,:....." Li'f4"4"k':',*Ilif , i fii'llirif OF TIGARD, OREGON 23 • SITE DE ELO P M N T REV IEW D IE PP IGATT ON: , , . -' : CITY OF TIGARD, 1 125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 .. Tigard, Cregon 97223 -- (503) 639-4171 FOR ,STAFF USE ONLY ' ' CASE /TO. 1 °�' emu. . �~ OTHER CASE NOS: �':-C 51 LP- cs21�-fJ RECEIPT NO. ' 3 f;e :4.APPtI CAl ON I A Y: __V< :: ' •' ACCEPTED B DATE: "�•-....•_. I. GENERAL INFORMATION Application elements submitted: '. R _ PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION S.W. Sc:holls Ferry Road ► A) Application form (1) , , . Approx. 2000' South of Old Scholls Ferry Road (B.) Owner's s3,gnature/written TAX MAP AND TAX LOT lSl 33 CA Tax Lots 200 and , T NO m TAX AU or r`wA -.= ,r OU - (C) 'T:itle transfer instrument (1) ; . ' f SITE FILE acres , �� (D) Assessor's map (1) f,a r' 1S $9 acre, PROPERTY OWNER(DEED (-IOLDER* MarJ er y Krueger : See Below (E) Plot plan (pre--app checklist) 7 . ••'• ADDRESS at a 1 Box 972 PHONE -'"2 :-.(F)_(�) AFPlica nt's statement '.:' '. CITY Beaverton ZIP 97007 (pre-app checklist) . APPLICANT* X:YZ Corporation (Tony Bonforte� � (G') List o f property. owners, addresses within 2 �� AT)DR��SS 1020 SW Greenl�ur� lid. PHONE 293�8G'60 ' • S0 feet Suite 400 CITY Tigard 21P 97223 (Ii) Filing fee ( ) *Whren the owner and the applicant are different ,M " : L 1 '"* ' ' '.'' / , eople, the applicant mast be the purchaser of record P , s possession written authorization DATE DETERMINED COMPLETE: authorization ED TO BE g from the owner or an agent of the ovine;' with written or a leasee in os�e�s3.on with ` ' authorization. The owner(s) Must sign this . -._ _... application in the space Provided on page two or rINAL DECISION DEADLINE:application p p DECISION submit a written authorization with• i ;� ' h •this application. , _.: COMP. P LANh�2Oid E DESIGNATION: ; • 2. PROPOSAL SUA R� The owners of record of the sUb,1ect property request site development re .q p review approval l to N P.0 Number . allow a 290 unit multi-family residential Approval Date development with 523 parking space :4.. Final Approval Date: Planning •', r Aloe Donald E. Pollock r 10211 SW Barber Blvd, Suite 202 Erig:.nneer:Lng i 1 Yw,wr�.r..Mw"'+r.rr+W.�.�.rr.Nt\+ .Nr• .� CO524P/1 f.? Pot�tl and, OR 97219 1��.�; 'd i' ,:F 0 ! i ''''''4"s" • 3. List any varilance, coirditional use, sensitive lands, or other land use actions to be considered, as part of this application: Lot Line Adjustment and Front Yard ,. Setback s' 4. Applicants: To have complete a pp licat ion you will treed eed to subanit attachments � described in, the attached information sheet at the time You Ltached 1.n.for�na ou :submit this , ° application. 5. THE APPLICANT(S) SN..A1,I� CERTIFY THAT A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that ma y be r .. attached to or imposed upon the sub jec.t �p�.°open.ty. . aLta. 'B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights , granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the condit ions and limitations of the approval. • C. All of the above statea °) t . � s arid the a h statements in the p lot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and thy applicants o acknrywled e that any P ermit issued, based on 't,.iiz, application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements; are false. } D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the app.l,.icatiion, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for app •oving or denying the application • ,: DATED this 7th. day of April l fl9 SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband at);d wife) of the stab ject property. flax Lot 20 : "''. T«. Lot 600: .. :�' �, wed'L:I+e.n?:+a1+N .i�,/c..:,. .•, If..:..na.4JM � ./.' � ✓ ,.. i. • Ma.rglry F. 1s' Formerl y Margery F. Krueger ; Donald E Pollock lock I. ,• tsr� pill/0524P) • • I6:' 5 ;t ••' Y 1 AY- 1 CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon SWIM OF FINAL ORDER - BY PLAIRIIING CatietEISSION NO, :` 1, Concerning Case Number(E) SDR 89.07 L y 89-15 N89-08 SL 8'9-08 :. 2. Name of Amer: ery gxel t (T.L. 2001 Donald pollock Cgeye.e. 6Oa1 • Name of Applicant: XYZ Corporation 3. Address 102'ts0 SW Greenbur Rd. c� city State OR zip . 97223 4. .. Property:: er Road a roximate� Address of �r� ert east side of STS Seholls �' y 2000 feet south of its intersection with SW Old Scholia Ferry Road. °' Tax Map and Lot Nos .: 1S1 33eg tax lot 200 P ( ) „� and 1S1 33CD, tax lot 600 5. Request: A req uest for 1 Site Development Review approVA1 to allow a ' family residential development _ and associated 290-unit �r+ulta.-� improvements; 2 a Varianoe from the required additional setback of 80 feet from the centerline of Scholia Ferry_Road. The ray eested additional al setback is 45 feet from centerline; 3) a - re sa Variance to allow the develpment to be Served' by two_accesses, as accesses are re. fired b the Code for a multi- amil develo merit of tFais __s1ze 4 a Lot ,Line. Adjustment .. '• into are;el©_ of ^a rosca.m tea: 1 acre res and 14_,21� acres ., between two parcels of a roxa.matel 2 ac �._ _____..pp and 14.59 acres. The balance of area of of these *excels 0.69 acres isJpeoposed to be dedicated to the State of ODrec(on as additional rl,,ccht-of way for SW lacemex Pert d d Z e approval for re nt afa onion of an o pn drains(ewa t hrough with a storm sewer.. ZONE: F,k25 (jMultit levFam ly Ftes erential., , • . units/acre 1. 6. Action: Approval as requested X Approval with conditions Denia 7. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted bat City Ball, and mailed tot X ,., The applicant and owner(s) q'•'. X Owners of record within the required distance X . The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization •' 8. Final Decl:sa.+oris g rnmental ageiscies • X , Affected ove ` : THE DECISION SHALL BE FT AT. OU June 26! 1989 uNT,Ess PFi r Is FILED. . , The adopted findings of fact, decision, and statement of conditions can be ' obtained from the Planning Department Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall, P.O. Host 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223,> 9r Anneal: Any` party' to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance e • with 13.32,290(A) and Section 18.32.370 which provides that a written appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent. filing of an a` You have " The deadline for fi � peal ie ' 10. PI.2Ens.nnsDepartment, any giaesti.oris, please call the' City of Tigard Planning 689-41714 blkm/s'iR89-O7.B W w , ti ✓ 4r { 4 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION r " FINAL ORDER NO. 89-15 PC , • A FINAL ORDER INCLUDING FINDINGS'AND CONCLUSIONS WHICH APPROVES AN APPLICATION - FOR A SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR („90.11-07), VARIANCE (V 89-15), LOT LINE , • ADJUSTMENT (Ti 89-08), AND SENSITIVE LANDS (SL 89-03) REQUESTED BY XYZ CORP.. 1: r , The Tigard ]Planning Cammieeion reviewed the above application at a public hearing on rune 6, 1959. The Commission based its decision on the facts, , findings, and conclusions noted below: I AG FACTS I. General. Information ' { , CASE: Site Development Review SDR 89 07, Variance V -- Lot PdSE. X39 15, loo Sensitive Lands St X39.03. w.N Line Adjustment X $908, REQUEST: A request for: 1), Site Development Review approval to develop a 29 p' 290 unit apart ment complet and associated {, improvements, 2) Access rrianc+ approval to allow the • proposed development to be ;served by two aCceases whereas the Community Development requires four accesses for a develop �ent of this size, 3) Variana to allow a •• a approval � • setback of , 65 feet from the centerline of the SW Seholl.e ; Ferry Road whereas the community Development Code requires s • a 70 foot setback; and 4) approval of a ]Got Ling: , Adjustment between ''two, parcels of approximately 2 acres . 1 p the and k and 1.4 28 s.Cr®� into parcels of a pra�k�a•telY' 1 acre and 14.59 acres. The balance of th area of these parcels, 0.69 acres is ProPoeed to be dedicated to the State, of Oregon as addition a , right-of-way or re SW Scholia Ferry ' Road; 5) Sensitive Land approval for Modification of an ;t° open drainageway through replacing it with storm sewers • COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION• medium-Bigh DenOity Residential . ZONING DESIGNATION: t �5 (Multiple t3ple Famil y Residential, 25 units/ ,.. acres APPLICANT: l YZ Corporation OWNERS: Donald Pollock (!Tony Dotifarte) 10211 SW Barbur blvd. /0260 SW Green-'burg Read 5-202 u Ti,g ar r.j OR 97 22: Portland, OR 97217 \ Margery F. Cri st •, Route oxg 1 o e , H 7 � ix �l Beaverton, OR 97007 ei 8 3'l?� -�+TI4)!1L t7RDER NO,. e0,Ml.5isr! _ 5...�. .��'=0,, - �x�crrr u�rperi�ac�.on Page i. • I 1 I ^ .+ ' LOCATION: East side of SW Scholl 1 e Ferry o e y R ad, approximately 2,000 �� •. / ,, feet south of its intersection with SW Old Scholls Ferry / Road (WCTM 121. 33CC, tax lot 200 and 1S1 33CD, tax lot ,'r'' 600) 2. Background Information In May, 1957, a Subdivision (S 87-03) proposal to divide the subject property into 72 lots was approved by the, Hearings Officer. In duly, 1988, the Hearings Officer approved an extension of the approval subject to conditions. This decision was appealed to the : w 1 City Council by both the applicant and surrounding neighbors but was later withdrawn by the applicant. y 3, iignity' Information + Except to the south, the parcel is surrounded by property that is ; zoned (Residential, unite/acre). Single family residential development iBlocated to the east in three phasei of Cotewald subdivision. The proposed Murray Blvd. extension and an approximately five acre u ndeveloped area zoned C-N (Commercial Neighborhood) are located to the s(auth. A small acreage parcel to , :'" ..,, the north is occupied by one single/ family residence. The Sunflower apartment complex abuts the p p Property to the northeast. 4a Site Information and Ptapar�a cripttion • The proposed apartment complex site canrists of two tax lots. 'fax lot 600 approximately 2 acres and contains a single family 00 c;ont�ins residence and detached garage. Tax lot 200 ire approximately 14.28 acres in e � v the � open the west and '•, north, and 3. portion size, urtdevel© ed is mr�etl o can field on t si a tree covered on tht� eastern pc►a»•�io�i of the Property. A drainage Swale n containi a small intermittent to north across the property. interitemt creek a;urns from ,: . . . �IThe applicant proposes to develop a 290 unit apartment development ' including 15 ree3 dential buildings and a community/recreation building The pr'opQ count includes 275 one or 'two _ edraiom • aE;d unit cau a sports court aunits tot lot 14 three bedroom �axn3.ta aw3.tanrnirng poo, p as recreational l facilities Serving the _project s residents. ( 0TE: The pond and northern most exercise/communi ,y building and pool shown on the may 17, 1989 site plan are to be eliminated according to the applicant on 5/30/89). The site Plan Provides for 515 p arking ep..a.e a to b.e located along a network f internalra advays. Thirteen garage bUildings would ; include 100 parking spacee oarporte world provide another 190 para j�paces. Sixteen designated hsndioapPed a 17�:�.'.,�cee would ;be Provided. . 1 FINAL ORDER NO. 89-15PC - SDR 89.07 - x 'Z COrporation - Page 2 mss. , . • The development is proposed to be served by two 26 foot wide ;. entrances from SW Scholia Ferry Road which is an arterial road under the State Highway Division's jurisdiction. A Variance lis requested ,., c3 y � qu d 1 ' to Community Development Code Section 18.108.070(b) which requires that multiple family residential developments of between 200 and 300 dwelling units be served by at least four accesses. An emergency ( : access to the proposed development from SW Morna.,,ug Hill Drive that was shown on an earlier plan submitted for this APPlioation has been eliminated from the site plan now under review. The site plan noes that 14 feet of additional right-of-way along ± , the entire SW Scholls Ferry Road frontage will be dedicated to the State of Oregon. The plan also notes that a new curb and sidewalk will be constructed along t'le site's fro ntage. The applicant's f study recommends that a left turn refuge be provided for the • main entrance to the proposed development, but a left, turn lane is not indicated on the site plan. t proposed development would be served by a City"of Beaverton The ro sped dlevelo meat w y in SW is Fe7C Road. M The public sanitary sewer trunk line Scholia ry p. sewer line will be extended through the site to serve parcels to the south. Water service would be provided by the Tigard Water • • District. The site is located within the Beaverton School District. Store drainage would be collected by a network of storm sewers 'is throughout the site connected to existing public storm sewers in SW " Ashbury Lame and SW Morning Hill Drive. The prcpoeed storm sewer ;;_ extension would be connected to a culvert under SW Scholls Ferry Read which drains to open drainage ditches. Because the storm sewer systeim would replace a network of open drainage ditches, Sensitive Lands approval is rec ,ested The applicant has l also requested a Variance to the required front yard setback along SW Scholls Ferry Road of 70 feet from the road's centerline. A front yard setback of 65 feet from centerline is requested for garages and carports on the mite's west side. A 20 foot setback from the property line i0 required ed in the R-25 zone. �r �yi side. Community Code Section 18 a 96.020(8) (1) requires that an additional. 50 feet from SW Scholls Ferry Road's centerline be added to the zone's setback a:egairement In addition, the applicant requests Let Line Adjustment approval to j resulting adjust the northern lot line between tam hots.' 200 and 600 result • in parcels of approxinnately 14.59 gores and 1 acre respectively, • p p 1 28 and 2 acres, The compared to the lots' resent szzes� of 's 4 balance of the original Parcels g` p to be dedicated to the State of s d,�e Oregon as rrigiit--of-way for SW Scholld Ferri.:. Road. Tax lot 600 is to • be retained for prospective future use of the bite for a day care center. The present application does not include a request for day O the Bite. Children's day care s a approval of a d� are center on t n '.i conditional use in the A-25 zone and mist be reviewed by the City's ,1.I..• Hearings Officer through a separate application and hearing Process. . rfl AL .ORDER NO. 89-15PC - SDR 85-07 x'- 'tYZ Corporation - Page 3 ' •�,.4t .. '.Y. w 'I.,•e i 1.,:,.x ,J, • ... 1,.. ., .... ... C t . _ r r'(• 1) 5 4 Agency_and NPO' 'Comments The Engineering Division has reviewed the propoaal, and offers the r following comments: aM The site is located along the east side of SW Scholle Ferry Road, west of SW oposed SW Scholia Fer - extension of SW Murray oulevard° and north of • ..T. Y Street • �' Road is an Wilton�i. on arterial under the jurisdiction of the Oregon State Highway Division. Access. to the site is proposed �from two driveways to . .. ` SW Scholia Ferry Road. The Community Development Code requires four yhowQVer, the submitted traffic plaa�. and pity ;• staff have concluded •• that driveways are adequate so long as , an exclusive left tu�turn pocket cket is provided on SW Scholls Ferry Road at the main site access driveway. ba Storm drainage would be provided by exLending the public line in SW Ashbury Lane, through the site to a culvert under S , Scholla Perry Road. The existing 24" culvert is of inadequate capacity and should be replaced by, a culvert of adequate capacity as required by the Oregon State Highway Division, C. Sanitary sewer service would be provided from a city of s Ferry Road. The public line Beaverton trunk line in SW Scholl • is extended through the site to serve parcels to the mouth that • cann • ot be served by the line is SW Wilton' Street. The need for extending the san,,ts,ry sewer along SW Scholia Ferry Road has not been determined, 5. • The Building Division has commented that a 'dero1itiOn permit must be g moving existing garage and house obtained before demolishing o� mova�n the �exa.z� located or tax lot '600 The Oregon St ate HighwaY Highway Division on has reviewed the proposal and has M provided the f ollowing GomnonL8• a. An Oregon State Highway Division access permit is required. b. An additional 14 feet of right-of-way for 51.1 'Scholia Ferry Road is required as shown on the plan. A five foot wide sidewalk and curb shall be constructed as Shawn, 0. A le, ) � yernmost entrance is into the i�aa3.ara. soutx x�equl.redr�rn lane x.nt a The Tigard Water District has revi eT�e d the proposal al and requests that he developer DiStrict with additional information on the pro p oaPd water serv .Ceplan The �ter District" reports that there will be no capacity problem with, serving a development of this siZeu FINAL ORDER NO, 39 -15PC SDR 89-07 1£ft Corporation -- Pace °i; .,.fir. Fl „ A. ' . ry » ,,.. ,fP.• ) • . .•' ..... i i,...,,. ,,...,. ., .. ..,. .. ! 1 ., I , . r.. „•;,, The Beaverton School District has commented that the proposed , development would be expected to add l aaproximately 41 students to the District's schools. The District notes that the students can be served by existing schools without exceeding the schools' capacities- However, the District notes tYa t if contiaa;ued a!'apid ' residential growth in the District ,continues, options fOr housing , additional students such as portable classrooms or double shifting :, students may be necessary until additional classrooms are A constructed. „ Neighborhood Planning Organization #7 endorsed a letter from several neighbors of-the site as the NpO sa comments on the' S proposal. the F April 19, 1989, letter signed by, Brenda Gilpin is not summarized in this section, but is attached to the staff report as attachment one The a lica pp' nt's flay 19, 1959, letter to Keith Liden (attachment two) ' responds to the letter from Ms. Gilpin. k. A comment ... : t letter has also been received from Edward Egging, ' an . + g property owner, (Attachment from neighbors` of they tTnat H 1) ohs, abuttin rop Y o tachment Three) stating represent the tmnentioned letter g . site does not Previously p e views of all of the site's neighbors; , • 9f s3, 1 2) not all. ' ' neighbors oppose the proposed development; and 3) the writer does ', not feel that develo menu of the is . p propa►s�ed apartment project w�onal.d be detrimental to single family home values in the neighborhood. A the hearing, the commission received comments from the City of rp Beaverton in ,a letter dated prune 6, 1989. The letter states that: Beaverton's transportation plan identifies that Scholie Ferry Road align with Davis Road to the north. Based upon that face, . ould recommend that the following conditions be. the city a follawa�n imposed on the above noted project: - Access onto S cholls Ferry Road shoUl.cl be limited to one • , access and that access be at the southern property line~ - Participation in a local improvement district for the ,, following improvements: , - construction of the Scholls Ferry realignment - construction of a traffic signal at the Old Scholla . �Ferry/Davis R oad intersection s�i at the xnew� New , Scholls Ferry Road/ Davis int construction of a traffic y / escdevrtion s Ferry Road a� Scholia �ear: R • Canatruct�.an of a left turn lane on at the driveway } A Sidev a.lk improvements along Scholls Ferry Road improvement ry/Davts • - Dedication for the m rove�aenat of Scholls� der Road No other comments have been received • FINAL ORDER NO 89-15Pa - sDR 89-0/ - x '7 Corporation.on - ?sae 5 • . '''' i:, r i- B. ANALYSIS .'e 1. Site Develbpment Review ' The XYZ Corporation'a proposal for development of a 290 unit apartment i'. complex conforms with Community Development Code R,•25 zoning district • J` requirements (Code Section 18.56) for type of use and permitted density ,l. (opportunity for 343 multi"family dwelling units based on applicant's density calculations according to Code chapter 18.92; 290 dwelling units o proposed), minimum setbacks from property boundaries (except the additional front yard setback requirement discUssed under Variances, below), building heights (45 feet permitted; maximum height of 40 feet proposed), site coverage (80 percent maximum site coverage allowed; less than 6O percent site coverage proposed), and landscaped area (20 percent ,• minimum site landscaping required; greater than 40 percent site ;` w • ;, landscaping proposed)Nct The proposal complies with Site Development Review approval standards (code Section 18.120.180) for privacy, private outdoor areas (decks 'and ..', balconies), shared recreation apace (sports court, swimming pool, tot :.;. lot; community building), site lighting, provisions for emergency vehicle access and maneuverability, and design offsets along building faces. Dwelling units and recreational facilities have been located to the interior of the site so as to reduce noise impacts on neighboring properties and increase visual privacy between adjacent uses. ., fencing buffering along differences: in ;• . elevation between this site vegetative adjacent properties aloe will add to s staff a sb rivac between the proposed development j p Y. p Y � p opment and its3 neighbors. � finds that reasonable care has been taken to locate buildings and site (-' improver ents so as to minimize the number of existing trees that will be e. . required condition of y removed.. A tree protection to plan assay.reou protection of dthese trees during , approval of the proposal p construction activity on the site. The proposal also complies with Code standards for total parking spaces 1. (435 parking parking spaces required; 515 spaees p revsded), covered parking (290 ,: ^ covered spaces required; 290 provided), designated handicapped parking 11 handicapped ,• handica p ed spaces required; .16 provided), • and maximum compact to ; total Parking space ratio (1:4 maximums 10 4.7 pxbpaaed). The ' •: internal roadways exceed the minimum driveway width standard 124 feet minimum width required, 25 feet minimum width proposed) and provide for adequate emergency vehicle maneuverability and a non-confusing access pattern (no dead ends) Proposed improvements to the SW Scholia Ferry Road frontage of the site will provide improved pedestrian and vehicle safety and will comply with state of Oregon His hwa Division A left g Highway on roadway improvement standards. turn refuge should be required to be constructed as a condition of approval of the r' g . pP p bpbs�al. The applicant's tra �Cic study hob adequately ,� : . demonstrated that the levels of Service of nearby streets that would be affected by anticipated traffic from the proposed development would not be significantly impacted by the proposed development. In addition, ! he • FINAL ORDER NO: 89-15PC - SDR 89-07 - iYZ Corporation - Page 6 6, f +r • • • • traffic study points out that several transportation improvements such as .. the Murray Boulevard extension, realignment and improvement of both Scholia Ferry and Old Scholia Ferry Roads, and possibly construction of the proposed Western By-Pass are presently under consideration. These . ;: proposed road improvement projects are intended to improve traffic circulation in this area. The proposed development should therefore not Y be expected to result in undue traffic problems. As previously mentioned, a substantial portion of the site will be landscaped far in excess of the minimums site area landscaping required in the R.-25 zone. In addition, the landscaping plan satisfies Code a section 18.100 requirements arem eats for street trees, Parking lot screening g along SW Scholls Ferry Road, parkin g area trees, screening of service facilities, g requirements except as fac�lit�.es and minimum buffering and. s�creenzn rF noted below. A six foot tall wooden site obscuring fence has been a• � g added ' . along the Parcel's boundaries with the Cotswald Meadows subdivision in order to reduce noise and increase privacy between neighbors. A minimum buffer width of 5 feet has been p.rovided on all borders of the site except along the site's SW Scholls Ferry Road frontage. 'Although the buffer width is appropriate, insufficient detail is provided regarding the types and sizes of buffer materials. Code Section 18.100.080 specifies minimum, plant sizes for required buffer areas. The landscape plan should be revised to provide additional detail on buffer area area. Code Section M materials and size. In addition, the site la,n does not indicate any • fencing around the swimming pool ticzn 18.1.®C�.146(C) requires that swinming' pools be enclosed by a rninimtim foie~ foot tall ' fence with a self latching gate. The revised site plan should also comply with this requirement. In response to neighborhood concerns, the applicant has increased the setback from abutting the rear yards of homes fronting Ashbury Lane to 15 structures oar are in this area required by the Code. Four carport setback� M Proposed setb The applicant has also indielited • in the May 19, 1989, letter to Keith Liden an intent to eliminate the previously proposed emergency vehicle access to Morning Mill Drive and to replace the Lombardy Poplars along the site's eastern boundary with the Cotswald subdivision with Douglas Fir or Canadian Hemlock depending on their availability. The landscaping plan should be revised to show these changes. 2. Variances Two Variances to Community Development Code standards have been requested as part of the Site Development Review application. Code Section 18.108.070(b) requires that multiple family resir3ential ... developments • containing between and 300 dwelling unite be served by four accesses. The applicant re qu est s that the proposed development be served by see, requires a setback� f 5Q hfeet from the centerline of SW Scho 1ls �Ferr b two accesses terry n 1B. )( Road in add ition to the applicable setback specified by the honing district. A 20 foot fzxnt yard setback is required d in the R-25 zone. pp requests that a 65 foot total setback from the road's applicant se eats t"ha The FINAL ORDER No, 89-1513c - BIER 89-07 - XYZ Corporation - Page 7 , v, r: l F y,) 41 centerline be permitted rather than 70 feet as would normally be required by the Code. ' Access Variance I Code Section 18.108.150 provides for the Commission to allow a variance to access requirements if it is found that: . 1. It is not possible to share access; 2. There are not other alternative access points on the street in question or from another street; 3. The access separation requirements cannot be met; 4. The request is the minimum variance required to provide adequate :. . . access; 5. The approved access or access approved with conditions will result n in a safe access; and 5. The visual clearance requirements of Chapter 18.102 will be met. • . In the present situation, the Variance is requested in order to reduce ;; ' impacts on the neighborhood to the east through not providing road connections between the proposed development and SW Ashbury Lane and SW Morninghill Drive in the Cotswald Meadows subdivision. The stubs of . ''' these streets on the eastern edge of the subject site would be the . logical points for additional accesses. Providing a road connection with these streets, however, would allow the opportunity for a significant amount of traffic from the proposed development through a neighborhood of i single rasnily residences and vise versa. The City generally tries to avoid each a traffic P attern, although this is not specifically stated by '•• , Plan policies or Community Development Code standards. s. In the present situation, no other alternative access points are ,' , available. At this time, there are no feasible options for sharing _ access with adjacent properties. The site's frontage is not long enough I ; to allow for development of three accesses and comply with the 350 foot ;., p .' access spacing standard applicable to a state highway. The State Highway Division, l'ig and Engineering on d r � No. not I : , commented that the proposed a�es� p lan for the would be detrimental to traffic safety purposes. The applicant's traffic report has concluded that the two access drives proposed can adequately accommodate all daily and peak hour site-generated traffic while ,still g acceptable traffic larger than and safety. The ' _ ' maa.ntainim �acce table. levels of t i proposed g .• han the min3amu�n width required p width of the accesses ro sed are 1 r thereby somewhat offsetting the need for additional driveways by allowing " easier passage through these points. The proposed site improvements at • ' the access driveways are designed to comply with the vision clearance requirements of the Code. BecauSe of the above reasons and in order to eliminate traffic impacts Of the proposed developments of the I'INAL OfDER NO. 89-i5PC -' SDR 89-07 - XYZ Corporation - Page 8 Y neighborhood to the east, the Commission approves the requested access , variance. �. • r The request on the part of tee City of Beaverton to limit access to the `, development is found by the Commission to be inappropriate because of desrelo the large number of residences which would depend upon one driveway. As , apart of the access approval granted by the State Highway Division, the issue of driveway locations and future street improvements will be addressed to avoid the creation of traffic hazards Variance Front Yard Setbac}c • As mentioned previously, subsection 18.96.020 of the Community ' ` Development code requires an additional setback of 50 feet from the centerline terline b of S scholia required by the Thin setback is in The addition to the ' a perry ict, The resultant 70 foot atbac � Y zoning Ferry � set g ��. R 25 z .. k from the centerline of Scholls Ferry Road is 5 feet greater than the 65 feet proposed. The setback from the front property line is ; k. • proposed to be 20 feet which is the normal setback for the R.-25 zoning r district. r The 50 foot required by Tigard Municipal Code ; - foot additional setback is .,` •i subsection 18.96.020 because SW Scholls Fury Road is classified as an arterial street by the City's Transportation Plan Hap and was until. ., recentl y by the Washingt on County Transportation Plan. Of the.. five ; :. streets classified, by the City's Transportation Plan i Map as .arterials, the Code requires that only SW Scholls Ferry Road and Pacific Highway have a 50 foot additional centerline setback I required whereas: Hall i Boulevard, upper Sooner Ferry Road and Durham Road have a 45 foot additional centerline setback required. Recent revisions to the Weethin on County Transportation h, �' elan. have downgraded SW SCholls Ferry toad to a major collector Classification while upgrading Old Scholls Ferry Road to an arterial :lassification. following a for , P ...��.lo�rir�g approval criteria Code Section x.8.134,A5® provides the � Y Seri Variances to non-access related Code standards These criteria apply to the request for the reduced additional setback from SW Scholia Ferry Road. (1) The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the pu p Code, be in conflict with_ the....policies '• uas+ oss�s of this Code b other of the Comprehensive Plan, to any y ear' $ppla�ca�ile �ao�.�.cies and s�tanc�ards p and to other properties in the same zoning district or vicihitye (2) There are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the are lot Biz:- or shape, topography or other Circumstances over:which the properties in the same zoning district (3) The use proposed wi11 be the same as permitted under this Code and r City standarde will be maintained to the, greatest extent that is _ reasonably possible, while permitted some economic uSe of land. .. ... a Page 9 Fa�t� ORDER. �TUd 89�-�.BPC �- Sb1It g9-�(}1' �» XYz..corporation n • re. ' , ' ' (;i, ) b. (4) Existing physical and natural systems, such as, but not limited to arks will not ' be .' traffic, drainage, dramatic land form s or p . " adversely affected any mere than would occur if the development were located as s pecif ed in the Code; and 1 (5) The hardship is not self-imposed and the variance requested is the f • minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. j The general Purpose of the required additional setback from the 9 P P � centerline is to permit or afford better, light, air, and visioon clearance i' on more heavily traveled streets, and to make the location of structures w ' compatible widening o f ' mpatib].e with the need for the eventual wideni streets. The reduction in the required additional setback from 50 feet to 45 feet. will I` A `: not -.negatively ativel ._.affect the amount -�of air or light available to the ' ''. ,, property or adversely affect vision clearance from the entrance drive to ' or from Scholls Ferr y Road. Widening of scholia r srry Road is bein g 4t Provided P P .e at ion resit edy rovided for by the Pro Posed development and the ,1{. ,c ' the State Highway Department of 45 feet from center will be made. No additional widening is anticipated. e The applicant has Pointed out that the circumstances over which the property's owners have no control that affects this property, as well as other parcels fronting S olls Ferry Road, are that the City of Plan Map and Community Development Code: have no n on SW Bch . "'Tigard's Transportation p y t yet been revised to La consistent with Washington County's redesignation •the road to a maor. collector classification. If the .. •.: of '� � for' functional 'Cla . City's Transportation Plan Map and Code would have already been revised , to reflect this redesignation, a lesser l setback requirement would typically tYPicallY be required and the Present site Plan world comply with that requirement without a variance , Allowance of the r �� requested variance would not affect uses allowed on the ' property nor will compliance with other Code or Plan standards be , affected. Staff does not foresee any impact upon physical or natural any greater than would occur if the development��Proposed allowed t o be located in co pliance with the .. P P required setbedk. from an Finally, as the applicant cant has pointed out, revised lad � results y y the.:har'dsh�. Plana for the znc PP Code with re�vi future use of the road. In�this way the hardship ie not self-imposed. The amount of variance reque> ted, five feet, is minimal and the setback pro posed b y the site plan would exceed the setback t hat would likely b required if the Code's set back re qu irement was based u po n S4 Scholia a Ferry Road being a major collector street. Staff, therefore, finds that , the criteria.f fc►r a Variance have been satisfied for this request and we recommend approval of the requested redu oed front yard setback , FINAL ORDER NO, 89-15PC •- SCR 89...0/ - X `Z Corporation - Page 10 !, , f - AT •1 '.11 .' 3» Lot Linq d-iuetment The propccsed lot Line adju.atment between tax lot 601' (2 acres) and tax lot 200 (14.28) acres will result in lots of approximately 1 acre and 14.59 acres. The balance of the area of these parcels, 0.69 acres,` is proposed to be dedicated to the State of Oregon for additional right-of- way for SW Scholls Ferry Road. The proposed adjustment complies with ' Code Section 18.162.060 approval standards for a lot line adjustment: no additional lots is being created; neither parcel is being reduced below : the minimum l o'�� size for R-25 zoning district; and no structure on either lot will be in violation of applicable setback standards provided that the existing structures on tax lot 600 are removed prior to recording the lot line adjustment. Therefore, all applicable criteria for a lot-line adjustment are met. 4 sensitive Lands In order to approve a proposal, that involves modification of an existing drainageway, the following criteria contained in Section 118.84.040(C) must be satisfied: 1. The extent and nattare of the proposed land form alteration or development will not create site disturbances to the extent greater than that required for the use; 2.` The p proposed land form alteration or development will not result in erosion, stream sedimentation, ground instability or other adverse on-site and off-ei*v effects or hazards to life or property , capacity of the drainageway is not decreased; and 3. The water flow w C 4. Where natural vegetation has been removed due to land form ' development, the areas not covered by structures orte ervious tsurf es will k e replanted to prevent erosion in L� P p accordance With Gaping and Screening. • ar section 1.8.100, l�,and 5 The dtainageway will be re laced by a ublic facility of adequate size to accommodate maximum flow in accordance with the adopted lat p 9y1 ,aster Drainage Plan. .» 6. The necessary cessar y U.S. y Corps ggiaeers and State of bragon Land B oard, Livssion of State nds app rovals shall be obtained. 7. Where laridform alterations and/or de r., . . elop;`��ent a�.e allowed within and h ' adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the city shall require the dedication of sufficient open land area within and adjacent to the .. p - ve Pl.,: This area floodplain in accordance with the com �reh�,�nisi an. rh shall include portions of a suitable elevation for the construction f a Pedestrian/bicycle ..pathway' ...e floodplain in a,c cor,dance wfth th e adopted pedestrian bicycle pathway p an (Ord 89 w 06 Ord 87-66; Ord. 87.32; Ord. 86-'08; ord. 84-29; turd. 83-52) FIN . 89� apc �. SDR 89.07 x corporation - Page 11 �., ORDER 'Nfl • i The applicant proposes to replace a network of drainage ditches F private sewer FF P L P g present: on the site with a network of Public and rivate storm sewers. The sewer w network would/. convey storm drainage to the wrest under Scholia Ferry Road through a 24 inch diameter culvert to an open drainage ditch. The storm sewer network would connect to existing 12 inch storm sewers~ draining to the site from Morninghill Drive and from the eastern edge of the site abutting the Sunflower p The stoma sewer plan does not show a abutting wElr a artments. S' connection with the existing storm sewer from SW Ashbury Lane. All of these existing storm sewers PresentlY daylight to the `subject o Details are not provi',ded on , the size of storm sewers ro sed to the P Y P Po installed. k proposal replace The Commission finds that the ro oral' to re lace the existing drainage ditches with storm sewers is largely consistent with the applicable ' Sensitive Lands approval criteria, except that additional details must be provided regarding the capacities of the proposed storm sewers and additional provisions may need to be made to collect drainage onto the subject site from surrounding properties. Installation of the storm sewers is not anticipated to create site disturbances beyond that whim a is necesaeary to, install the sewers. Replacing the open drainage ditches should serve to reduce the potential for erosion, stream sedimentation, and ground instability on-site and the storm drainage plan is not anticipated ` to adverse/.y impact ' downstream open drainage ditches. The site and tandaca pin g plans propose tore-vegetate all are o disturbed by . , the Storm sewer installation except where structures or paved'.'areas are proposed- The area is not identified as being within a 100 year floodplain b y the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Fenno Creek -• Summer creek, Jule' 1980 Flood Insurance Study (Sheet 81). The area is also not identified ate a wetland by the Comprehensive Plana wetlands g y map. ? • subject to state and federal l wetlands and 'The area, therefore is not p d floodplain regulations» The Commission concludes that the ro 0 P P sal to replace the drainage ditches with storm sewers is consistent with the applictible Sensitive Lands criteria except with regard to details on the 'capacity of the on-site storm sewers and the culvert under Soholls Perry Road- In addition, it must be proposed drainage network Will adequately demonstrated that the ro sl,.d ste�rm draa; pick up storm drainage to the site from other properties City policy with Sensitive Lands applications is to defer the provision of such details until Engineering bieision's the detailed review of proposed public improvements. The Commission grants sensitive Lands approval for the conceptual Plan to install storm sewers and p F to replace the open 1 . drainageways subject to conditions requiring Engineering Division detailed review of the capacity of the proposed system. 1.'� 5- Te jghborhood Concerns Brenda Gilpin to Keith Liden raised numerous issues related to the am B p 1 19, 1989 letter from - The � ri PF � The letter has been endorsed as the comauents of IFO p#7 n/d a arently re es • s . g p P� .pm � of Several of the 3.imm.° apparently a pro Posed development end site.. ediate neighbors of th Pr aen e the comments The applicant, Tony Bonforte, in -a Ma y 15, 1585 letter to Keith Liden, ee ORDE1t No. 89-15PC - SDR 89-07 -' X e Core oration Page 12 ar addresses each of< the neighbors' g the site ., hbsars concerns and notes changes in t plan that were made to accommodate some of the neighbors' requests. At the public hearing, a list of 10 i recommenced conditions of approval was submitted by Paul Mortis, planning consultant, on behalf of the Cotewald neighbors. Neighborhood residents in attendance indicated that if these conditions were imposed, they would withdraw their opposition to the application. The applicant indicated that the propose conditions' wwould' be acceptable. These supplemental conditions are found to be appropriate opriate by the Commission and are incorporated as conditions of approval. C. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS • The applicable criteria in this case are Tigard Comprehensive Plan policies 2.1.1, 3.4.2, 6.6.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 8.1.1 and 8.1.3 and Community Development Code Chapters 18.56, 1884, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.110, 180120, 18.150, and 18,u164. The ':• Pl anning commission concludes that the proposal with modifications is consistent wit h the applicable portions of the Comprehensive Plan based, upon the findings `noted below: a. Pulicy 2.1.1 is satisfied b ec s Neighbo rhood Planning Organization 7 and surroundin g property owners were given notice of the hearing,' and an opportunity to comment col7ilment on the ;applicant's ''proposal. b.' policy 3.4.2 calls for the protection of vegetation and natural drainage courses.g The drainageway only carries water seasonally and t. no 0 ec3,al ,rotecti�n i� p rescrbed in the Bull Mountain Community ' ?1t? Trees on the site should be protected to the maximum extent possible. The site plan provides for retention of a significant number of existing trees and the initial plan for buffering material on the site's eastern border calls for retaining existing vegetation. Although further detail will be necessary aegarding buffering materials, the applicant's intent is to utilize as 'muith of the existing vegetation ` e exng vegation aa possible as a buffer. ,d � der. c. Policy 6. .6.1 requires b i g between different land uses. As die us ed above under Site Development Review, the site plan aatiefie;1 Code requirements for setbacks and provides an adequate buffer dth although jai - u.gh addita.ornal ; nforMation will 1 b� necessary, regarding buffer materials. . on Shall d alegate the responsibility for review of the revised buffer plan to staff. 1n addition to satisfying setback and buffer width requirements y the site plan also locates recreation facilities in the center of the . at a distance proposed development and plates all dwelling una.id the Bite's boundarie8 fat in attempt tc� mitigate effects of the the �re�ua.�ced �aetbackul in p g proposed development on neighboring uses PIN AL ORDER No. 89,-15PC -° SDR 89-07 W XYZ Corporation :°; Page l Q i r , d. Policy 7.2.1 will be satisfied when additional engineering work is completed for accommodating storm drainage above and within the development. The Washington County Bull Mountain Community Plan, which applied to the property prior to annexation, identified a drainage swale on this, property running south to Summer Creek. The . swale is not classified as a significant wetland or wildlife habitat area requiring special protection. The conceptual plan for replacing the, open drainage ditches within this swale with storm sewers satisfies Sensitive Lands approval criteria as previously • discussed, as long capacity g work on the Storm sewer system. acit issues can be a rop riatel, handled through the detailed as n • g l en g Lraeeri e. Policy 7.1.2, 7.3.1, and 7.4.4 are satisfied because adequate water, sewer, and storm drainage facilitiesa, are available to the ' development. The applicant also indicates that these facilities will be provided ' within the subdivision as required by City standards. f. Policy 8.1.1 calls for a safe and efficient street system that meets Y � Y current and projected needs. The proposed site plan proposes Q widening of Scholia Ferry Road and provision of a sidewalk along the site's frontage. The applicant's traffic study has appropriately concluded that projected traffic from the site will not significantly affect levels of service on adjacent roadways. The traffic study also concludes that the rose "- d accesses to the " Y p Po development are properly designed to : handle peak traffic loadings without causing safety or traffic congestion problems. The City's Engineering Division has examined the traffic study and has concurred with these conclusions. The r ec ommendatio n by the City of Bea.:v erto n for local improvement district participation for a number of state Highway improvements is beyond what the City of Tigard normally requires. Xt is the opinion of the commission that the improvements noted in the City of Beaverton letter are not directly related to the relatively modest impact this development will have upon Scholla Ferry Road. g. Policy 8.1.3 will be satisfied when the conditions of approval g improvements are completed' relating to street �Lm rover�se , The Planning Commission has determined that the proposal, with minor modifications that should be required to be made prior to building permit issuance, is consistent with relevant portions of the e community Development Code based upon the following findings: ' chapter �. 805 (fit-�25 gone) is satisfied because the proposal a. Ch conforie with use, and applicable dimensional requirements % the R-26 zone. b. Chapter �.. eoauae appropriate 18.84 �Sens�i.tLVe' Lands) is satiSfied b weaenres are being proposed t� mitigate any storm drainage Problems y FINAL ORDER 10. 89.45PC -r'SDR 85-07 - XYr7.+ Corporation - Page 14 __.,.....rA .....w..l... ..s.,.. .}o- .x r.•. «.ak+w.m-r.41:r. a.ra... .....1-,...n....., ..I.r.......;...+,U.AL.:-...n.4rA....w?.4+..s...d.«w fl related to regrading of the property and, the replacement of open . ` drainage ditches with storm sewers. co Chapter 18.86 is satisfied because the site plan provide® for appropriate distances between multi-family residential buildings to assure privacy to residents and adequate light to all units. d. Chapter 18.100 (Landscaping and Screening) is satisfied because ° plans for tree retention and added landscaping of Code requirements p, g and parking lot for minimum site area landsca lnw ® street trees, an screening. Additional ion on plant materials within tional Lnformat required buffer areas and. on swimming pool area fencing will be • provided on a revised landscaping plan. e. site plan does not(Visual pla e Clearance signs, trees, because or structures within the 3i required clear vision area at driveway/road intersections. is. satisfied f Chapter 18.106 (off-Street Parking) ' ' ' sfs.ed because the site plan satisfies Code requirements for number of total parking spaces provided, number of covered parking spaces, number of designated handicapped parking spaces, compact to standard Parking space ratio, . and all applicable parking' area design standards. 18.108 Access Egress, and circulation is satisfied chapter � ) g• p ` � g ' because the site plan provides for safe and efficient access and _ proposed g . h to e Tess for -het s .a.mited fronts r enex.al r, .xcul.ata.on on t e s des ite the S: d and. age, on SW Scholls Ferry Road. The requested variance t©�` allow two accesOes to s whereas . to serve the site, w Code qu velc pment of this size, is r . the C justified r as Previously ac des described. a Reduction in the number. of � . anticipated to negatively impact the ' ility of accegsesy is not p proposed development. the }. emergency service proViders to serve the rotiosed de reduced number of accesses also will eliminate or reduce traffic ` p acts u p on the neighborhood to the east as cap pa_ed to a p lap that would have additional ac cesses into the Cotsw ald,develo pm ent. p 18.120 (Site velopment' Revierrr) is Satisfied' because the h. Chapter l8 a�GO �2.te Ij�e Plan provides uiildi,ngs ,b and other site , located so as to Preserve. improvements to b�! locor the proposed bye existing trees and to minimize alterations to the site's topography and drainage systems. The site plan also situates the buildings so as to provide for ! privacy and light for the Proposed dwelling units and to assure compatibility between the proposed development and adjacent uses. i o Chapter 18.150 (Tree teroval), Will be satisfied upon the applicant obtaining permit prior removing trees in ent permits will be granted reparati,onafarrdevelopr�tvinl� errtiax rl.azy tog an only If it is . ° found necessar y to remove the trees to accommodate st ructures, ructures, driveways, utilities, or other proposed Site improvements. The site plan illustrates trees within the development that will be retained. An arborlst's report outlining methods of protection for FINS ORDER NO. 89-15PC - 8DR 89-07 XYZ Corporation -• Page IS , . the trees to be retained rust be submitted prior to the issuance of a site grading permit or tree removal permit. 1. • Chapter 18.164 (Street and utility standards) will be satisfied upon approvz.1 of public improvement plans for and construction of the proposed imProvements on SW Scholia Ferry Road and public sanitary and storm sewer extensions. Approval of public improvement plans is • required prior to the issuance of building 'permits and tree removal ' permits for, the proposed development. D. DECISION The Planning Commission approves of Site Development Review SDR 89-07, Variance V 89--27, Lot Line Adjustment H 89-08, and Sensitive Lands SL 89- , . • d3 subject to the following conditions: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET PRIOR TO RECORDING THE PROPOSED LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT. 1. The garage Tax Lot 600, which is shown to straddle,the:proposed a ;ot. adjusted property line betwc.en reel s, shall be removed prior to recording the Proposed lot line adjustment.a A demolition permit shall be obtained prior to moving or destroying the garage and house. STAFF CONTACT: Brad Roast, Building ' Ob vision, 639-4171, Ext. 311. 2. The lot line adjustment survey, maps and legal descriptions shall be approved by the City Engineering staff prior to the applicant recording the adjustment with Washington County. STAFF CONTACT Jon Feigion, 639-4171, Ext. 375. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE HET PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. � . 1. Seven (7) seen of plan profile public improvement construction plans and one (1) itemized construction os estimate, stamp d by a Registered Professional Civil Engin eer, detailing all proposed public improvements shall be submitted to the Engineering Division for , �o (2) seta of plan and o submittal of a final 1 Shall be nor approval. TtnF " p y prior to plans. 1 submz.�ed for preliminary review STAFF CONTACT: Oary Alfson, Engineering Division, 639+-4171, extension 378. on of Proposed 2. Construction posed public improvements shall not commence " • � . Engineering Division has approved public improvement until after the En P.. :...... will, � developer-engineer a' reementur�.nce plans, The of wall re ,air:e a 100 Percent erforma' mmitment, an b: g agreement,` the payment of a perm it fee and a sig n inStallationistre©1 ight fee. Also, the execution of a Street opening permit or constriction compliance agreement Shall occur prior for or concurrently with the is Siicef. r�ve uyic i pr; Ovement plan' s. STAFF CONTACT: John Hags an Engineering Livir O . FINAL :)ROE R NO. 89-15PC - SDR. 89--0/ 1C Z ;Corporation -- Page 16 Gs I 11' r . _»,,,..;,w�_,.M,�,�,,.,;�;..,., ..�;.Mme..___;..... ..»:., ,, . .-..... ,, �;;,. .,. •. Ha 3. The applivant shall, obtain a Permit from the State of Oregon Highway perform work within the right-of-way of SW Scholle 1. Division, to rf of the permit shall. c,,rmt w� . Ferry Road. A copy , be provided to the City Engineering Division prior to issuance of a Public Improvement ' Permit. STAFF CONTACT: Gary Alfaon. 4. The proposed privately-operated and maintained parking lot and/or roadway plan-profile and Gross section details shall be provided as part of the public improvement plane. STAFF CONTACT: Gary Aifsraa„ 5. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the_State along the SW Scholia Ferry Road frontage to increase the right-of-way to 45 feet from the centerline. STAFF CONTACT: Jon Feigian. 6. The proposed privately operated and maintained sanitary sewer and storm drainage system plan-profile details Shall be provided as part of the public improvement plans. STAFF CONTACT: Greg ,Berry, Engineering Division, 639-4171, extension 373. The applicant shall. demonstrate that, storm drainage run-off can be 17.e �+ st fig. ;� discharged to a public facility of adegUate capacity and that on- site storm sewers are adequately sized to accommodate anticipated flow in accordance with the City of Tigard Master Drainage Plan. F. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry. S. Sanitary sewer and storm drainage details shall be provided as part of the public improvement plans. Calculate,)na and a topographic map of the storm drainage basin and sanitary sewer service area shall be provided as a supplement to the public improvement plane. The submittal shall include an evaluation for the applicant to install the need of :a public sanitary sewer through the site and in SW / Soboil s Ferry Road, STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry. 9. Evidence demonstrating the availability of sanitary sewer Service by the City of Beaverton shall be Submitted as part of the public 4 .., improvement plans. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman. 10." Public storm and sanitary sewer lines shall be installed within 15 feet easements. easements shall be execut®d and recorded on rms sae p, .. city The Ci, -.licable. Parcel and referenced on and become art of all standard ar l m that will become publicly �I�p deeds. All manholes t of a driveway d way unless lcCated within the traveled s • owned shall be otherwise approved by the Engineering Division. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry. .1 ng Con8truction shall 1.' Aiaccsa to the site t, tr i be from SW scholia y only. Parking construction Vehicles or of vehicles ! Parkin of owned by those employed at the site, will not be permitted in the y p' �' P Cot sWa • tl.d 'neiyhlc►orhbod '> STAFF CONTACTo, John bagman. �:-.. _ 9-151'0 - SBR - 7 F1NA�' aFt1�ER l�O r 8 Page 1« S�.;:O�i �'��`� Corgaration - S I u 12. The applicant shall provide for connection of Proposed buildings to the public sanitary sewerage system as proposed. A connection permit is required to connect to the existing public sanitary sewer system. STAFF CONTACT: Brad Roast. T, 13. Prior to commencement of site clearing and grading, a plan for capping the well on Tax Lot 600 in compliance with State of'Oregon regulations, must be approved by the Washington County watermaster's office (Contact Clayton Gardner, 681--7018). A copy of the Watermaster's review and approval of the plan must be provided to the Building Division. 1uilding Division field inspectors shall assure that the plan is complied with during site preparation in advance of final building permit approval. I' I 14 A revised landscaping plan; shall be submitted for Planning Division approval which provides for additional information on buffering materials. Buffer area materials (including existing vegetation must satisfy the minimum buffer material size and spacing specified . I by Code 1E.100.080. The landscaping p lan shall also be ' revised to reflect other changes that have been made to the site • � t ct plan. STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Offer;, Planning Division 15. PRIOR TO ANY SITE GRADING OR CLEARING, an arbcrist:'a report shall be submitted which outlines which trees are to be preserved and the methods of which they will be protected during and after construction. Staff recommends that this be accomplished with a field visit involving the developer, a staff member,� and the arboriat to adequately identify the trees. STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Offer. 16. Fencing with a minimum height of 6 feet shall be installed around the drip line of all trees proposed for retention prior to any construction on the site. The fencing shall be inspected and approved by the consulting arboriet and the Planning .Division prior to permit issuance.uance. Any later land clearing work within the drip line shall be performed by hand. A qualified arborist shall inspect the site at a minimum of one time per week during construction to ensure that the tree t"s t preservation program outlined in the above- Mentioned arborist's rt is being followed. STAFF CONTACT: po being �,, I' , Jerry Offer. 1/.: A tree removal permit shall be obtained prior to any tree removal on the site. Removal permits will not be issued for trees designated for protection in the approved arborist'S report unless sufficient by ,ng arbari CONTACT: Jerry verified STAFF rrO�tT... cause is b the consulting et. 5T offer. 18. A revised site Np1 an shall be Submitted for Planning DiVis3on approval �ra� pproval which : l odes the following items: I , a. 8limination of the pwtsv;lously proposed pond and second swimming pool and exEtVOise/Community building. FINAL ORDER NO. 89.15PC y SDA 8��d"7' -» %yti Corporation - Page 18 n7r } ,. it . /111111011111111111111111111111111111111 . • M1• ..A.,.n. ..... _ ...,. _ . _ _ .. ..4.c...F ....-.l-+:ua..+».Af...r....+.. I.euw.<....y.-....:. y{, ' •'./ 1 111 b<, Fencing around the swimming pool area at a minimum height of i . four feet. 1liny gates into the swimming pool area shall be , equipped with a self-latching ;mechanism. S TAFF CO NTACT: Jerry offer.; PRIOR TO ISSUANCI CF AN OCCUPANCY PERMIT for any new buildings on the site, the following conditions shall be met to the faction of the planning Division. STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Offer: h iii �: 1. All landscaping materials, permanent fencing and other proposed site improvements shall be installed as per the approved . . . landscaping and site plans 2. A sign permit shall be obtained prior to the erection of an d identification fication sign. Sign location and size must be in accordance ' with provisions of Section 18.114 of the Community Development Code. - THE FOLLOWING SUPPLEMENTAL CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE PERMIT ISSUANCE NOTED (STAFF CONTACT: Keith Liden, ph. 639-4171 twenty foot) (20') rear and .. 1. The., applicant shall provide minimum �v y ( ) ; . fifteen foot (15") side yard setbacks as landscaped buffer zones for all of pr� ' properties j Cotswald ) the a° ,y�i����� s ro erti.es ad acern� to this C nei neighbors t(PRIOR TO LDING PERMIT). g 2. Encic'bsiEd garages with lapped siding and peaked composition roofs shall be installed, for all parking spaces adjacent to the CotSwald neighborhood as shown on the applicant'sd submittal (PRIOR TO '. OCCUPANCY PERMIT), lighting directed off or away or outdoor area 1�, ht�.n shall be . 3. No street g 0 ' OCCUPANCY from the applicant's proposed development (PRIOR TO t?Ct�`UPAN PERMIT). 4. A substantial buffer fence (See Condition No. 6) shall be ' a _ - properties abutting the the full length of Cotswald neighborhood prior to any other site demolition or co nstruction. This fence shall be installed by hand (or other non- '.. t shall instalg m� damaging me means) so as to Yprotect the integrity of cavegetation along the perimeter. of the applicant s site. The applicant all required landscape planting ,and irrigation as early as is practicably possible (PR/OR TO SITE t ORX ANA/OR BUILDtNa PERMIT) 5. The applicant shall establish the required buffer zones prior to any other construction on the sitei and these zones shall be marked protected from all unnecessary distur bance duzing the co nstruction process and selectively repaired to the minimum extent necessary to ensure lon g term s.tabila zaha on of this area (PRIOR TO B1IL DING PERMIT). FLNAL ORDER No. 89-15PC - SDi 89-07 XYZ Corporation Page 19 f . 11C. 1 ' ' . .. • 4 6. A "solid wood and concrete post" fence shall be constructed along the rear and side 'yards of the applicant's property abutting all ' Cotawald neighbors. This fence shall be located one foot (1') into the applicant's property line and built to the following . specifications (PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT): . Twelve inch (12") square eight foot (8') tall posts at every . property corner and one at the middle of each property, and f° four inch (4'1) square eight foot (e') tall pressure treated ' cedar posts set in a concrete` footing at every other necessary r location. Six foot (6') tall 1"` x 6" cedar fencing (panels butted edge- ... to-edge) and a two foot (2') tall cedar lattice above the 1" x , 6" panels with 2" x 4" base, panel-lattice separation rail and top cap y wood post. i..c► ca between ever concrete and/or' . All materials shall be of Grade "A" commercial quality. 7. All buildings i . � shall be constructed with ,lap siding and 7!� T-111 l be used on the site (PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT).. h shall 8. The applicant shall install "natural form" evergreen conifer trees of the following or similar species (PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY PERMIT): , Douglas Fir Western Hemlock; or Grand Fir The following schedule shall be used: ,' • 60% @ ,a'-8 in height; 30% @ 8°. 10' in height; and 10% @ 10'-12' in height The trees shall be randomly mixed and spaced 10' to 15' apart along the required Gotswald Neighborhood buffer zones to fill 'in where existing vegetation is-_r absent and to continuous and solid sex�eea�,g g n create a 9. The ' pp Paint all building surface�e in colors or tones g . which maintain comPatibilitY compatibility with t hose currently existing within and around the area and as approved. by City staff (PRIOR TO ' OCCUPANCY PERMIT). 0. The applicant shall l d ',r..0 bte r iz...ed pl..a s.tic" trash lids for all trash containers located in �he development (PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY PE),MIT) THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID OP EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE FINAL APPROVAL DATE.... .ASE. I , FINAL ORDER No. 89..15PC - SDR 89-07 XYz Corporation - Page 2 0 • , it is further ordered that the applicant be notified o PP f the entry of this orders PASSED: This day of June 1989, by the Planning Commission of the City of Tigard. paw eg : aton Acting President Ti.=rd Planning Commission I I br/xyz11av,ks1 I d ' 4 • `WALL ORDER gOi 59-,15PC - SDR 89-07 `- X 'Z corpo 'ation - Page 21 _M T • I , A C...µ.41rµ,r.)^ �w.W r.4.....•.,,inl..hM+.,lyf5rt-+M ihr4.t n {...M.:+J.ry ...n '' ra�..........+ t , • ...+1.«:. .IV..:...r1J..t4..n. .n. .war ti.n.H...•-+wh.«JM,r . ..:.1.MJv{t..,.rlm..xa... r+w..•LIe4t-l..nn ...iw, . ,1r-a,..rlrJ«. .wp....A'u4.wn.::!•.vrrf�..l 4i.•..a�1 . AFFIDAVIT' OF MAILING ;a,' , E O F R STATE 0 T EG61V • , County of Cdasttingt ■n ;) ss. . City of Tigard ) I, !,�1VlL� ),...� being first duly sworn/af fi r , on oat 2 3 • depose acid say: (Please i'riatY 1 That I am a 1� 0 The City of Tigard, Oregon.(e).0 _,,Q i; , ,,,,k tr- , Th , I, _ That XI served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING for: l L.--" That I served NOTICE OF DECISION tor: ' City of Tigard Planning Director rrr'T • 1 gard Planning Commission Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard City Council I . ice/lNatf ce of Decision) of which is attached. CMarked • copy � 'Henri. '.Nat (public A co Pu" ''w tie to each named persons at the address shown on the Exhibit A ) was mailed t attached list marked exhibit °'13" on the l �'' day oC, 19 said notice .NOTICE OF DECISION as hereto attached, was posted on an . . . appropriate bulletin board 'on the l.v% day of-,, (.A-t - . l9 ` , Y and deposited in the United. States Mail on. the l ' "" day of -,,,,,. c .(,' , 19 (f , postage;prepaid. I • . 6 • r signature ,• g ture Person who posted on Bulletin Board ' 1 (For Decision Only) Person 1.r del ,vered t ,, OFFICE S ius ribed and s1rori/affirms to before we on the day of ' Y ��. i i9 �d r r I t tOTARy I'(iBLIC op OREGON • i my Codimisson pires, , I , I 0257P/0006P r I a , I • sdr 89-09/v 89-15/111 89-08 (.a . .. kRUEGER-POLLOCK . XYZ CORP ' TONY BONFORTE . XYZ CORPORATION PAUL MORRIS 10260 SW CREENBURG RD McKEEVER/MORRIS, INC. ' 812 SW WASHINGTON S--1110 .�, TIG�RD, OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97205 DONALD POLLOCK GREG, ATHA A . 10211 SW BARBUR BLVD s-•�o2. 12.11 I:FTH'AVE PORTLANDI i OR 97217 POF, LND; OR 97204 . MARGERY GRIST RI,. 1 BOX 972 1 WA)'-'NE KITTr-,ESON ' BEAVERTON, OR 97007 412 SW BROADWAY . PORTLAND, OR 97205 , • BOB POULTON RUSSELL HEAD OTAK 11689 SW WILTON 17355 SW BOONES FERRY RD ' , TIGARD, OR 97223 I LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97035 ' ' i 1 1 --Jklitii,,, '(41(1r.tAtif'''kriV 4',-,.e.- i,, , 1 • • EVELYN KARLS �A .. , g d ' a RT. 1 BOX 382 (,.,.„,,-1..riCA,,,,,,,c I,'' t'-',',-'*, ' ; BEAVERTON, OR 97007 L,,„\1/4'•''? k �. .M° ;;°)�"i*i'kLI, 4 iY is re 11 ym ^ver v.'"' a dl• 6 ac+' GAIL STOVER ' RT. 1 BOX 381 vet �4 1rW&- EAVETON, OR '9700 I',J r - , J !. • MARLIN fIOPFER RT. 1. BOX 390 • BEA`'ERTON, OR 97007 1 ' MICHAEL "STEAGMA_'N 11823 SW WILTON ' TIGARD. OR 97223?2 3 ANDY ,?RIEBE 13909 SW CRISP CT 1 11 rzGARD, OR 97223 fi I BRENOA GIt PI 1 1 11721 SW WILTON TICARD, OR 97223 1 x'1 1 II ' I I ...I..a..e...,_.0._.____...- :....._—,_.i:« u»...._..-s_...Y..-....,, ,.xw+,...i«, ..w,.A4..,J..,«-..,-..W.u1 rv.,..:..:., •,.J..,A..;l. • ....,u,+_.R. . 4.A r .i..,+w..+r.»n+..I.I v..IkF.M+••.,+rr «-,alra.ia4.. .. - AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) . City of Tigard I a, , being first duly sworn/affirm, oa oath ' depose and say: Please Print) That I ani a A ,S5,5Xf ( for I, • The City of Tigard, Oregon. , L.-----That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARItiG for: • That I served NOTICE OF DECISION for: City g Cit of Tigard Planning Director ,,, Tigard Planning Commission T1pard Hearings Officer Tigard City Council , A copy (Pt*blic FHearing Notice/Notice of Decision) of which is attached (Marked I Exhibit "A°') was mailed to each named persons at the address shown on the k attached list marked exhibit "B" on the da �. y of vl %j e said notice NOTICE OF DECISION as hereto attached, was posted on an + r j appropriate bulletin board on the me- day of .1 X1 and deposited iu the United States Mail on the 1 1�^ day of i'\l'\, 19%q f 1 , ,postage prepaid. ry Signature Person who posted on Bulletin Board or Decision Only) • Y Person who del' vere. to ) ST OFFICE ti . I " ti / y, ? 5utb cri�xeti'' and°� swon affirm to before me on the '� A- ' day of , 19 ,.yl ,p�; v. 7t 1,57nv' rill r y�' ; , �++uow+ a „b ry i' M t rr M1 v NO'.. °Y PUBLIC OF 'OREGON Ny Comm 1,64 ion ExP arcs z 93 ; r "n ITT N O257P/0006P r �+ a .. ....:.. :. . •. , . r'• J........:_ice .r.,t..L..... l _•...r:.. r:.s - - ,.. .. ..._. .. .. _..,, ,..._... ......_. _ r.._. ...-«..+..n......-.w{f..,..fr�.2....-..w(/�\2 v NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING !II NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD PLANNING CCMMISSIfk, AT ITS MEETING O . . ., ` TUESDAY June '6,_ 1989, AT 7x30 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TICARD CIVIC CENTER, TUE a • 13125 SW HALL BLVD. , TIGARD, OREGON, WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO.: SDR 89-07, V 89-15, M 89-08 NPO,NO.' 7' r. n FILE TITLE, Krueger-Pollock/XYZ Corp. ', APPLICANT: XYZ Corporation OWNER: Margery Crist (Tony Bonforte) Rt. 1 Box 792 . 10260 SW' Greenburg Rd. Beaverton, OR 97007 Tigard, OR 97223 (also Donald Pollock) REQUEST: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 89-07, VARIANCE V 89--15, LOT LINE f ADJUSTMENT M 89-08 (KRUEGER-POLLOCK/XYZ CORP.) NPO # 7 .. A request for 1) Site Development Review approval to allow a 290-unit . multi-family residential development and associated improvements;' 2) ' a Variance from the required additional setback of 50 feet from the r ,. ,t- centerline of scholls Ferry Road, The requested additional setback is 45 feet from centerline; and 3) a Lot Line Adjustment between two . parcels of appro3cirately 2 acres and 14.28 acres into parcels, of approximately 1 acre and 14.59 acres. The balance of the area of of ' these parcels, 0.69 acres, is proposed to be dedicated to the State of Oregon as additional right-of-way for SW Schoilss Ferry Road. ZONE: .R-2S (Mul.ti,ple-Family Residential, 25 units/'acre) LOCATION: SW Scholia Ferry Road, approximately 2000 feet souith of its ,... .» intersection with SW 'Old Scholl: Ferry Road. (WCTM 1S1 33CD, tax lot 600 and Isi 33CC, tax lot 200) (See Map On Reverse Side THE PUBLIC HEARING ON �THHIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ADOPTED BY HAPTERT18.32 CITY THE COOMNCMUNZTY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE I AND AVAILABLE AT CITY BALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. ANY PERSONS WAVING INTEREST IN T CIS MATTER MAY ATTEND AND BE HEARD, OR TESTIMONY MAY SE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO BE • ' ' MATTER ENTERED INTO THE RECORD OF THE HE RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR • r BY LETTER PRECLUDES'AN APPEAL, AND FAILURE TO SPECIFY THE CRITERION FROM THE ' COMM NITY bE A .FPEALNT CODE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT 'WHICH A COMMENT' IS DIRECTED 4 BASED ON THAT CRITERION. ' FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ,.LEASE CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTI ENT AT 6541714' TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BLVD. OR CONTACT YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD PLANING ORGANIZATION (Npo) # 7 CH. ERSO ,gyp 0,,}��,.qy'�{ _._;,__ n. .M! MBEl 4.2 �^J�0 bll.11l 47VNi.. �amea30 larx PH.©NE NtT1M(BERs fi26-054'0 CHAT /SDRS9-O7.Bi ,. a1 r n �l n ■ '•w... ,.w7.tMM. 1.—^...,w«,..4.+ ..,wuu■:■•.,4;"•,.,.,,..-4dn a..Y'.. ,._ .._l. , ,...�u.. ......+�....._ ..w ........T.r.,.x..+,.«._.....J..w..;,. _,.4«.._,;;.,_.a.,.r�x......r ,......u........ •.',4-.,r,wo..-....:.d«,2,....y...,,.,:..,....,.,.:> .::....,.L+.w":.,.;.,.,.,.,, u.:..k',.-...w«..):.4Jr,..a.r»,...4:.".ant.+G.:H4-.'.. +.a...,.=,t.ts..:::. ,..•u. .a«..;.d era 't I LI ' ''...i. --./...'''°"--,..'...'-.'-' ''' ' . , '' -, '. — ' , , . ' a-'-• S Wi--1-1—r '•'''' • • -0 HEF'FIEL1 p� b • t cr. V•� 111 • v „.:. ,,, .• , .. , ,, ,' ., .,, <t. ., ., . ..r, , . a c r, S.W. ASHE2 JRY L N f • \ 1 l�E' • '•• q,S.Vy: kIRIP1Ca LN TL t). LAURMQ nor cr MI4s,w. 1p *it II -al.4 - rya MtRNiNG J`; ., • • ,.,, . , i, , , , ' ' . 32 '3' 3 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' i , , I Iii ck. 1.1, . , , J, 4 IIH . 1 , 5 , .i= h .:- . ' ' - ' IS '4k'' ' ' '. ' .. . ' 6 ,..,m 4'14 4 b r r f”' \ - < sw, NINDOgN i':4'' � ENSI .,,Al . S , il , . t � `' ' ' / ae: , .. ., . . ,, , .., , ,, , . , d r ,. , . , .. ., .. ,,, ,, ,. .,.. W a S"T xis { I C <ed L � raj r 4 . • :.�_......S.i�ti•.drt.....�.ay„.1 .:.::�.,.J...-r.i.....:« ..w�a:.-..n....:;.,.,, ...+._....�...c:k- ,.;.e u... -a _.,n«...;xi 5«�4.,.r.a.;�,.............4.'.;..roc.4.m....,...-..:....u.'....i6....uue....,t.sm::...t:W.., ...._.�,:,.w.....-.a,.«i-+.w+,w14.-«:t.•.::�k..,,-wx.:l,.��.»+.�«.+..+....4Lun!..aM..,:M1;.t,^...::i{.n..u.,...,...u`.,._.«,.,.....,.,.w+;..'SK1 SDR 89-07/V 89--15/MLP 89-07 MARGERY CRIST KRUEGER POLLOCK/XZY CORP. ,.... 1 ' ',a ..,, RT. 1 BOX 792 BEAVERTON OR 97007 . , , RUSS KRUEGER 'r RT. 1 BOX 792 �� $EA VERTON OR 97007 70 7 • XYZ CORPORATION • TONY BONFORTE 10260 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD, OR 97223 , JAMES BOYaAN 11844 SW MORNING HILL DR I , TIGARD, OR 97223 ti DONALD' POLLOCK 10211 SW BARBUR BLVD S-202 • PORTLAND] OR 97219 ,, i • • m I I , 0 J..."..n i« 4... a.... ........ .......—+.r::.w a. -+s.—..11.w-.�,:.- wJ...4.:.- . ...r»wr .✓....N.I 1 w•. Y.E:: .A.la.... .i ...Lrr...+.:..,M..++il"iM ,I.Ik.ra:•.-�-,..L1.•.a.:,M.N • 1S133CD-11700 w 2S14BA-02000` • I I JUNE M. 0 T DD HERB ' M®RISSETTE BLDRS INC. 11801 S.W. Wilton " 10400 S.W. Allen Blvd. i • Tigard, OR 97223 ; Beaverton, OR 97005 1S133CD-11800 2S14BA-02300 ran}^/7"�j'' MICHAEL & CARRIE A S G TE MANN DAVID A Sc MARGARET. S RICKA.d.D C Wilton Wilton venue Tigard, OR 97223 i Street ! 12061 S.W.SWi.. g , Tigard, OR 97224 � I IS133CD-11900 2S14BA-024001` a' 1 c~ ROY D PFE:[FER/SANDRA M WRIGHT , STEVEN A & MARGARET Y. KLEIN ,, • + 11845 S.W. Wilton 12049 S.W. Wilton Avenue ' Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 1S133CD-12000 2514BA-02500.... • ' RONALD J LAURIE A , ' vRVrz® DAVID X & MARY '1� BOOTH I , , 11867 S.W. Wilton Avenue 13874 S.W. Crest Ct. Tigard, OR 9, 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 1S133CD-12100 2S14BA-02600• SANDIE RUSSO BILL M & DEBBIE L LA.MERS , . I 11889 S.W.' Wilton 13916 S.W. Grist Ct. Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 .�02 1S133GD-12200 ?2514BA 700 , YY JAMES D BU S ' , TTERF�CETD JOHN I F &'KRISTI A PHILLIPS Tigard, OR 9 2 Crist 11925 S.W. Wilthn, 13938 S.W. r_ 7223 Tigard, OR 9722 28148-00200 1 KLIC1ITAT VALLEY BANS P.O. Box 167 Goldendale WA 98620 I , • 2514B-00201 08A BAD lJt7.tiB D OF A LLB AvxTC�l 0 �' OREGO 14355 8:W. 8c1.1,0118 Ferry Rd. Beaver ton, OR 9 7007 �.. 2S14BA-01900 ' ROBERT F & 0ATt/LEEN L DRAoA ' 13901 S.W. .Nitidon 'Ct: • Tigard,td OR ? g 1 97223 .....,-.. ,n.,+.«,,.»..r4—...:.:..._.-..+a-:..w :.«......»..:.+........::... .,. ... ...»...L dw-1 n..........:r..u�.•,,...: ..nw L.•t...,_...1..n1.':w..... .., y e ', i rt I 9 . L ( 1S133CD- � . =08800 ,� 1S133CD-09.900 '' 1S133CD-10800 , yr. ' ROBERT W & EILEEN J HAWK KEITH M & VICKI L'SORENSON I GOLDRIDGE HOMES, INC. f' ^\_ 13865 S.W. Grist Ct. 11890 S.W. Wilton 1870 S.E. Pine Street . Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 i . 8 g � ��f, Hillsboro, OR 97123 jam' ., w 1S133CD-08900 1S133CD-10000 Ir 1S 133CD-10800 y 1 I ; ' JERRY M & BARBARA M THOMAS , TH MAS � STEVEN C & JANICE L COLE 'W , DON & SONDA C GRRDES 0. 12027 S.W. Wilton, Avenue 1: 11878 S.W. Wilton 11674 S.W. Wilton Tigard, OR 97223 2,.1 Tigard, OR 97223 . Tigard, OR 97223 t ° 1S133CD-09000 1S133CD-10100 1S133CD-10900 I' GARY T & DEBRA J BOURSON DAVID P & TANYA J LA DUCA JA14ES R. MCGEHEE '9ij 11747 S.W. Morning Hill 'Dri;re 11856 S P W. Wilton P a O. 1 ox 25571 .5. Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Portland, OR 97225 D-09100 151330 'D-11000 1S133C D-1(32G0 1A133G HERB MORISSETTE:BUILDERS INC. RANDY J & CINDY L SMITH JAMES KLT TONG 10400 S.W. Allen Blvd, 11834 S.W. Wilton Avenue 13789 S.W. Ashbury ' Beaverton, OR 97005 ,, Tigard, OR 97223, Tigard, OR 97223 1S1330D,-09200 1S133CD-10300 18133CD-11100 ,. ,- DAN ;. . ' DANIEL E/KIMBERLY C GRITBERG PHILIP E BAKER/DEE G ANDROS i W PAUL & H JONES 11992 12ds.WR 11812 s.W. .1'r! Ashbur I W. W Walton Avenue 13821 S y _..972 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, 97223 Tigard, OP, 9722 g 1S133CD.09300 1S133CD-10400 1S133CD-11200 ` 12VID D/TRACEY J HENDERSON DAVID B & SANDY CARNAVAN RUSSELL D & CLARA E HEAD � ' 12014 S.W. Wilton Avenue 11776 S.W. Wilton 11689 S.14- ,;Wilton Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 4. 15133CD-09500 1S133CD-10500 1 1 52,33CD- 1300 JEFFERY L, ALLMER BRUCE J & DEBBIE A MAY JOHN K. & BRENDA J GILPIN N 11985 S.W. Westbury 11754 'S+W. Wilton Avenue 11721 S.W. Wilton St. Tigard; OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard,' OR 97223 1S13301)-09600 1813301)-10500' 18133C1)-11400 r/ ,/ KIN DIANE DRAKE BRUCE Jr & DEBBIE A MAY MARK 0 & KELLI:E J LOW,MAN 11963 G3 S.W Westbury Terrac 11754 S.W, Wilton Avenue 11743 S.W. Wilton Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard OR 97223 Tigard, OR ' 97223 151330D-09700 1S133CD-10600 - . li 500 1S133CD CHARLES A & DONNA JO MCKENZIE JAMES W & LENATTE R GR.IEB A LORAINE & GERALD X HEWER °` 11778 S.W. Morning ,Hill Drive 11732' S.W. Wilton Avenue 11765 S,W. ;Wilton Avenue g i , 3 Tigard, OR 97223 I"igard, OR 97223 �. OR 9 2� , 23 `T�, a id. 7 18133CD-09800 15133G1)-10700 1S133CD-11600 i, . R' ;AN G & SUSAN SAN C ROCI•I HELEN J. ITOaYrefito Road RONALD Wilton Avenue 11756 S.W. Morning Hill Drive 8650 S.W. " venue Morning a Tigard, OR 97223 Eeavetton, OR 97005 Tigard, OR 97223 1 P` ii"�ifPd , 4 ' ' ~, r I 1S133CA-01200 l 3CA-0 120 � , SUNFLOWER ASSOCIATES r� 7.S1C,D-001.00 �{ 02400 � 1S133CD I ' Limited Partnership SUNFLOWER ASSOCIATES LTD. RICHARD T & CAROLYN M I1A,UGHA,N i , P.O. Box 426 10930 Lucky Oak Ct. 11794 S.W. Swendon Loop I Wilsonville, OR 97070 Cupertino, CA 95014 Tigard, OR 97223 -'J .,' 1S133CA-1300 1 .-;,,,. r 1S133CD-02400 , RYNOLD E. & EVELYN M. KARLS ' ;1 .! y JOHN P & MARY C MANNING Rt. 1 Box 3132 ` 11798 S S . � .'W. wenden Loop P Beaverton, CSR 97007 Tigard, OR 9 223 r` 1S133CA-01400 1S133CD-01600 1S133CD-02600 ' CAROL J. OLAWDER EARL R. & DIANA L. NOAR DAVID R.' ERTEL Rt. 1, Box 365 11766 S.W. Swendon Loop 13745 S.W. Ashbury Lane Beaverton, OR 97007 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 ') , 1S133CA0-01700 1S133CD-01700 1S133CD-02700 . CHESTER A. & GALE C STOVER MARILYN Y & JAMES M. RIDER RONALD E & JANET E CHiAPPELL Rt. 11, Box 381 11768 S.W. Swendon Loop 13275 S.W. Ashbury Lane e Beaverton, OR 97 � 97005 97223 97223 Tigard� ,a 5 Ti ar d QR .972•. g �d OR 9722 Ti Tx, a - - ' 1S133CB 005 0 1.5133 CD.,.,01800 157.33CD-�0�800 .. ROBERTA C UETZ GEORGE V 1 ' ICTO'R PALMROSE DAVID J & COLLEEN T EAS T IAYJRA ANN d AkIPBELL ! Rt. 1, Box 364 ` ' 117709 S.W. Swendon Loop 13705 S.W. Ashbury Lane Beaverton, OR 97007 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 ' s '''ill"'""' """"" 18133CD-01900 1S133CD-02900 J RUSE ANDREW LENS NARK' A & MERR7LL USE S�IAR 12300 S. W . Swendon Loop 13681, S.W. Ashbury Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 { .r.5i.).;l,u-uu�uu ' 1S133CD-02000 1S133CD-03000 cI, GEORGE & MARGUERI`TE CLARK S't r SA N ALLEN "DAVID W & CARLYN N BATTEN 1EN 381 Oak Leaf Drive 4007 S.E..E 64th 13665 S.W. Ashbury Lane ' Eugene, OR 97402 Portland, OR 97206 ' Tigard, OR 97223 1S13300-00400 1S7.33CD-02100 18133C1)-06500 . LELA M. HOORE ESTATE OFFER THOS 0 & BEVERLY` :A 11ERBER R ESTOUP % MARLIN & MARILYN H � CER MICHAEL W & JANET Rt. 1, Box 390 11782 S.W. 8vendon, Loop 11804 S,W, Morning Hill. Drivo {'., Beaverton, art 97005 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 1S133CC-00500 1S1330D-02200 18133CD-08601 RARE . S B .. � CL2�'�`ORD D STRANB � � URG G THOMA LEY` III pA,UL G & �t.iTINE N WEL'IY Rt. 1, 1032 , 11786 S.W' Swendon Lbop 7.3909 S.W. Grist Ct. • ,; Box '- Beaverton, Ok 97007 Tigard, OR 97223 .t,igard, OR 97223 l.11.,.,':'' r,.....'. 1s133CD-02300 - . . & GREGORY GE � �� 15133cp 08700 1INe �' MATTHEW H & ILENE'R MILLER MICHAEL . 11790 8.W, Swendon Loop 35.39 N,W: 120th St 1 Tigard, OR 97223 P'ortl ax1d, OR 97229 • ;. ,: CITY OF TIQARD, O 2 c ' • SITE DEVELQPM APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 — (503) 639.4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO. OTUE CASE NO'S: • dy RECEIPT NO. AiitICATION A(jCEPTED BY: DATE: }. 1. E1l.AL INFORMATION Application elemeAts,.submit.ted.:. ` DR.OPERTYADDR ESS/LOCATION S.W, Scholls Ferry Road A) Application fury (1) ,, APProx, 2000 . ' South of 01d. Scholls Ferr Road B) Owner s signature/wri i, . ten TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO 151 33 CA Tax Lots 200 and authorization 600 (C) Title transfer instrument (1) SITE ..SIZE 15.89 acres Assessor a s ma p (1 ) PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER* Marjery IrOe er . S ee 3eloW (L) Plot p lan (pr e-app checklist) ADDRESS Rt. 1 '1,0„!t. 97E PHONE Applicant's', statement . . CITY Bea�eBeaverton ZIP 97007 (Pre`"aPP checklist) APPLICANT* Last P ro P ert Y„ owners and ADDRESS 10260 SW Greenburg_ Rd. 'PRONE 2938460 addresses within 25O feet (1) Suite 400 2 CITY Tigard • ZIP 9723 S (H) Filiag fee (t ) $free?�./ 41, 1 C 1 ,`'� *� �. *�Tl�en the ,ow•ne- And, t PP � � . t a t be the purchaser -of record people, the applcanthm s lieanL ate different or a lessee in possession with written authorization DATE DETERMINED TO DE(COMPLETE: from the owner or an agent of the owner with written : apt thorization. The owner(s) must sign this application In the space provided o'rn, page two or FINAL DECISION DEADLINE t. . _ sti.bmit a written authorizatio11 with this application. COMP. PLAN/ZONE DESIGNATION: • • 2. PROPOSAL SU1 ' RY • The owners of !record of the sub ect property •request site. _. _ - req de�'e�optrient rev�,ew approval to t�t,P:O I�utber allow 290 un multi°-;taumily resideDtial ar Approval Date, development wi th 523 parking spaces. Final Approval hate: Planning • Also: Dbha7d E• Pollock 1011 SW Earbur yr�d, ' 0524P/1:i.P ` Po tl a.hd OR ' 7219 y F . tW ° Ih • • , 3. List any variance, conditional use, sensitive lands, or other land use actions '. to be considered as part of this application: Lot Line Adjustment and Front Yard Setback Variance 4, Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments ' described `in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. , 5. THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT I I A. The above re.uest does not violate an deed restrictions that many be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. B. granted, applicant will exercise the rights If the application is ranted the a licdnt wx granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. C. All of the above sta?.ements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhil,iits transmitted herewith, are true; and the --applicants. .so 'acknow 2 edge that any permit' application, that any such s tatements 'are is found' tha . falsemay be revoked if it D. The applicant has s r cad the entire contents of the application including „ nds the requirements for approving' the policies and criteria„- and underst� or denying, the application. ®. • DATED this 7th, . daY of April 1989. SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the subject property. Tax Lot 2© i t Ts. Lot 600: ;WA' Marg ry F w' Is Formerly Margery F. Krueger Donald E. Pollock I , (ESL:pm/0524?'). I , 1� .\,f I • 1a. .. n .,�:..,n 1.1 .,J aW..-r,....... .., r., .ur4 a.4W U1 44... .. -M.l1,.kh4; c.-,... .t.4. !•:t !wr,l"�i,:la . I`�,,.r,t w=. t=.», 1.+4,)1..) 1 �:{ $ P)- � «:r, r'�1.�1 t t r��.t_._�t C' F'1w .c r- Year 4, f. ,�r1�:N ; t.t�:1,r< .�w rt: r t 1, C i•; t� "t i or I�r 1 � w , r,:i;�,r ••1:_ r._ r1 t ;+ j-«'t- � a"t�y� f:a y ; .-c.• • ;,' '" .L ''+A ' .":y" E t::_1F .•.r••' .4t y I t .1, l �. r F I i" t {_:1. a• , �I,,F1"•y',. rk pa•.t y .1.::1..1 r i 01';:it. P.'4 Xr ={:-1 3 tt a S I .DONALD E ,,r t:1(2)1.".1,,t 10E11 W A RBUti=; • �..}j}j '�" -t �t �5 .1. J I1.i.w:`�_r «,I."lv P r.• ry'"•)• �• ["'41•'�1,...1,�•t r,`� [='•, 'tYI�}r=1� L!rTrlt�Rit«•r, rc ri rnli• rn:fit 3 . Pr o f M•,r t' ., M 1... t'�t(..�C:1"'��+' �'..4 t f'(..),"'rti a.± o 4 Land 1-4 r t a a:i Ta t"�a ti r'1`r ' L 4 1.4, 1 I rl',"cr t n r, 1!; 0.1" rc s<:+.1. T i"t�' r i rtl at ion ,I. t t�•t ! 1 1 I 1 . 7 u C`' o1_ • • . 53 , Pr i C11"' ''r'e X11" 1",Ci' &nu +!«tt"_ C?i71e i"i'L 1 I n y„c i-fit .t t 1 9 ! r r;E rl't hI X +te " F t t”CJp r t" t`"r: u.r .'L h c:l ii tray'e Op t i o ti:• o 1." r r 1 is t . t" 1'1E, • .w ID (R I F1 a-t" 1 s sul•NNI='LrCiUJr"_r•', At SoC x LTF«t rft 41" rI'I Fwf 1. • • 4 t _{.�.1 3 iw�,"it'• F!.r i Tr I; ,I•`J` I rr CI,i~'1 u rr I". r.CI t"1 GJ a 4«,.,. t"a f c.t 1" i r'« ' ,("s A 1..,,t,rru And a 111 t": r)t t tiro 1, 11 I"i-II 'a1` t 1 " 1.'71"'"',L:.� 1, I'. ,1,H<ri I i"�''�' 1'' ''v 7 t"`i(1,%»'' �,"A�i`•�i c »1 7 u I 1 er t5;I► .-twl �,:�i «t r I t"t�' aria C«I�. ' �, &, 1. ~�-t 1. '1 ;11a �' ^'t 1"'w��`� f i t�:.�':!�r I M F c'.1 1. � � " t,.t 't 4�"171E:r r!.',w� 1 ,,.., .'� a r�r•'{ • •' r''I�a _tr.)"fl h t I:1 •�.S." :Lw,i`�:�:'tw u P •••a h k »��1- 1;t 11 r"I • t ? �t.4 J.:71 k 1 t.'.: ,..' ..� ...a r. t ?!• ., tw w �Yrs r i +'.0 SIC=�'.y f'''1 1�a E �"r" .°r F`+"fl,.. " �; �.:.«.*►wt+'i!'' L I I. 1 I �r , {�� 14 a E8,it iC ii 4 i erg? T 1 lift, 7=F, I'g94"+fir"•i i" SC"'l`( I f ND•4- T C'' iwt I T I 01%1;r t,3‘.twr f TAX "1 u 't 1 1I L X 1L 1 pQ�1 Y 1� w , .r:di �."�, i • r i«« u ,r"R!G rM1}4 I t[1 e!1`"y Ct"'�w�1w ITtI» 1, '1 ;,'t... f1 I 1"'�o.i�." a . !•!y ,".. p. yi" L F r It 1'r t w��..a i i..�1"''Na;Y�' M1 w= "fir.c't�i't l «•t t Y I,i' aY o I. r1(`tu{� Il� • . F , REQUEST FOR ANTS { TO: !. 0 8 , � / DATE: . Awryl 2, 19 9 FROM: Tigard Planning Department . RE: SDR 89.07 / V 89-15 / MLP 89-07 KRUEGER-POLLOCK/KYZ CORPORATION For 1) Site Development Review approval to allow a (200-unit) multi-family p improvements on a 15.89 acre I ' development and associated, im rovements residential deve parcel; 2) a Variance from the required setback of 50 feet from the centerline of Scholls Ferry Road. The requested setback is 45 feet from centerline; and 3) a Lot Line Adjustment of WCTM iSi 33CC, tax lot 600 and 181 33CD, respectively tax lot 200 from 2.00 acres and 14.28 acres respectively to 1.002 acres and 14.59 acres, a total of approximately 15.5 acres excluding -w dedication. ZONE: R-,�5 (Residential, a .304 acre right a 4TE , !� y � units/acre). LOCATION: 2000 feet south of Old Scholls FerryRd.,(WCTM 1S1 33CC, tax lot 600 and 151 33CC, tax lot 200) • Attached is the Site Plan and, applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied d by various departments i PP y P �'� ° and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you w ash to comment on this application, we need your comments by May 1, 1 9_ may space provided separate to 989. You ma use the a ace rcvx.ded below or attach a se' as�ate letter t ' your comments. If You:are unable to. respond by the above dates please return your the staff contact noted below with r comments and confirm your ou comments in, writing as soon as possible. If you have, any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 .4171.. ` STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Offer PLEASE ;CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY We have reviewed the proposal and have no Objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: ., Name of Person commenting: Phone NuMbez b)n/SDR09-*07.L3KN n5�j3 w p i . • . ',".,+......«...r+ ....-Itiwn::...+.•,.........H...A4Y......... ...........r.... r.:,..a... ..v. :.M. .... U.-..,. r. ....a....uw l.-...:Iv:.,,a.e......,..L1 w...HWw.4-4 _ .. ......r.-,r.W.4+r.:.+«A.,M...K r I ' NOTIFICATION LIST FOR ALL APPLICATIONS 1. V''/NPO No. c l,k,,, .:, CPO NO, I 2. CITY DEPARTMENTS PARTMENTS f/ ` 1 4--14.) L1,..)� )-� v �. I , � u �� �-- JrBildi Isector/BrRd / Paks & Recreation Board /Curtis S. ', City Recorder Police ,IF, G A. Other Ln irn e ring/ ar e v 3. SPECIAL' DISTRICTS I _ 4,,//"..Fire t Flre District 45(%),_1//'' ' ,_. ,. School Dist- No. 48 (Beaverton) z', • - . (pick-up box bldg.) Joy Pahl PQ Bvac 200 , t/ igard W.D. Beaverton, OR 97 8 W Co Tigard W OR. 97223 �� 13137 SW Pacific H(Tigard) 841 � Commercial School Dist. No. 233 CTi , �Y» Tigard, OR 97223 Metzger)W.D. h Ot e r 4. AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS . I I I Wash. Co. Land Use,& Trans p s Boundary Commission • 1.50 No'First Ave. . 320 SW Stark`Room` 530 • Hillsboro, OR 97124 Hillsboro, OR 97124 , rent Curtis Kevin Martitt _ METRO P . fir- 2000 SW let A►e. OR 97201-5398 Prt rYd � . o la �. '� y of Beaverton X Jim Hendry'x .' " ._. PO Box 475 - 4755 SW Griffith t�' Cit o 5 Beaverton, OR 97076 . State Highway Division Other Lee Gunderson PO Box 565 Beaverton, OR 9/075 (, '1 7: SPECIAL AGENCIES . t.' General Telephone t,/7 Portland General Electric ' Ed Wilmott Jim Johrieo t 12460 SW Msira. Portland General Electric Tigard, OR 97223 14655 y , SW Old 'Scholl/ terry �.. Beaverton OR 97007 151h) Northwest Nature.) Gas 1 Metropolitan Area Commt initiations Ronald D. Polvi`' PE, PLS TW'i,n °a a Tachixal 5Y Getttet 220 NW Sec®nd A-te: 1 181,5 NW' 169th Place S-60°.Z0 Portland, OR 97209 Beaverton, Ott 97006-4886 I � Pacific N'o rrthr est $e11: Other (f)",57(f)",571)/0021,P) I ,�" I �C �Aliti,144ti� " ' , _ a 9 M " ,..;�.,.:,.w,;.�.c�.�.L.;�'.............,.,_. ....,:...r.n.....„...,.�,....,.«.., .:.-+......::,..,:a,.,.. '' .......::,..o.:..:.w..,.,.u-r...,�::.:..e.-,.........:.":a:�....,.�......::......"r_,.:,'.*,,..�..r. .,..a::..«-,-......,.-:w...�l..,.....�:....,.�.-..;.. L....,i. �--1-- u«..�.L....w..,..tit«,.i.v ,.�...,.a.,,+e...,a-.rra".r,.. Mw. V4.«.rve.#'.r.i+.wig.w--e-.w ta--w,•u�.n, wrw.w.�m „ I , ,"r +..x.•.rkw,.�,.,,,xww..w »4.w,a r. a w�^ p. .e"«,»» lw-�.-.r.... 1'" I r` ,E, .,,,�.».t..,,.,...,,w,.�w .��M--r+...,.I,-}•,a�.»�..w+.+:r,.wr.Wrrawlw+w..^�--�I t,�wo. +«....wwa.�yww Aeaiw Y,fi _" • , P. r a. 1 r , t , Yrk:I;m�i nA M r, rw p, � Nw .Y w rY- wqW ��M I "� r ,Ei ,. j ,Yik rpR rn "r ,�Ni +h ePr .w-�MiY C w,:n ry NCI hi •r YM�.eY1',Re4"-;)" ti t Y' m f1�y, i I I � 4n N � � F �,_. � ,�;� fir,, ,.�, '�� �4 ,.�..�,� .t "y♦h+ y �q;,A to l,�k ,W st , I : . �...R# Y ! O Y'Ey'k :,w�le4 1,.SYpI�. 1 Y. 1!.Ct t),•Y'MV Sf yA� �r.t , 1 re: �� �N.Y N' �..Wxl/VY MI ppyy -$a, 5 .w. 1 v Y 4 Anu.4u. .,.,a n _hw, �►: � .�1 �w t�..r�!'�Y�1+w"J ��Rwf 1�- �+�y Y"�'".MrN' # - '� • a/,f r7 W AI;J A.) e �W1y'N`' �nr'tl" i D'��yi,u �r� �„e �Yl�f�f"r���V,,)1"'1 AI 7 1 1 M F V rf i{ ri,�H'LYr„ ���+ry1�M{� �x FYlh Mw d�1 t�f� 'T IrI�� :N•',... �.a�N AfW�• +H tw11A. µ N24 1,F^0.1,k11\1 1 n, M _ 6 '.Y HA ,} •p W k. 3„) � WN.IIYY hq1 YUY 4dV`IwM4W1,Y!fMMWM :e4eY14tYY4lwINrm,.1.w1•Y�VwI YTrliwW.r{,i Mr�AMIH MYl YI.it MMWi111'xiiWnlRa'. YelW.u,e•P11Y MYiYi.11r:IW1W4A 5�!r w.YY,YN+i rteq NNW I,h.'nwnr rtga YJI YAM/+Yy%1k WArk atKYUN�.ilnu q,pl eYlM 111Yn f. YMWYq:K4♦•4YM+�V.IM.WYI YIM,nw n4.N ,YM 11 Wllbk,Y,. • _1�. .;�". , �� � � kl'•Y I M W W WNi neG/,wwr ur✓u+)MJ Y4Y WsY MIYxd _I, j rr+ r wi�pJ 1'Y ,.n..4 dd,y�j iae.w+ r(q�LgpY 1 1 ,rF. C30'ry �I r . YhGe t y,t�lY!71 V Ali I!fr �IM.M''�YIPYE 1 rl F MJ PEA Nuf( W F1 HI�I e _ 1t ' I i +1, • 4 - ���3,3 f"����7Yw.�'aw�A"�Iµ 1'Yr ii'y.le f,' , '1-: S- I wI i 77 {{ I , I I �96 I • IF Yn II • A 1 } ii FTIrw....., 4R1) -----------0-_ . -,_ ______,.,;-,.A,,,i,„ --_-.. L' '-- -''--------- W. Hall Qtud. = Sox 23397 Xegor 97223' k . ... . \r ‘ - ' - -- ------- =--- „. - , i _ _ , _ 1.,... 1 , _, , a , . .., , .. ISI33CD-01900 1[A-RK A- Sr MERRILL J RUSE . ' �� , 223 ,. 12300 S.W.. . Swendon Loop '�<. Tigard, OR 97223 - ! PewA.N .0RE 1 f 4+ qo7 x _ i .. _. 40., ,_ it „ , „ , , „ , ,, , i.1.1,,,,,_.iittti,.i.iiiiiTti : . ,. i __ _._ ___,._,_ _ .__. , • i -- - _ .=. ;• _ _ . . . , - , . , - .:- - , . . , _ : , , _ , _ - _ _ ..___ _ ._._______ _ _ ____ _ ______ , . _ _ __. _ . . _ _ . . - e • - ' 1 , • i .,..W...,...-F _ ...,u� .. ...}era .+ .,i,..v.,,G..-,A.. -,— .. „ .,.a,..,:,A.•.;tip..._.;.; ,,A.-...—+ a... .u,.,G«, ...,..1.»..k;�:i.n.l.rw ,a,.w.+. ..r.,,,44....::+., .;tu.x.....-w...i,. ,a:.i•.N:. w ` '. It MLMORAUDUM City of Tig ardr Oregon TO: Jerree Hrdina, Building Division Phyllis Harris, Finance/Accounting Bonnie Mulhearn, Planning Division • FROM: Marcia Crawford, Engineering Aide DATE: February 8, 1990 , RE: WCTM 2S133CC, TLs ;500,600 WCTM 2S133CD, TL 200 t. d e �Ad r se assignments for the Woodside Village Condominiums naums have been approved by the en inierin division The addresses are as follows: , g cJ . Th Building 1 - 13856 B.G . Schools Ferry Road Building 2 13824 °' Building 3 - 13880 " Building 4 13906 Building 5 - 1 13914 Building 6 - 14102 « '' Building 7 - 13994 " Building 8 13922 " Building 9 .-. 13930 , Building 10 - 13938 " Building 11`- 13946 Building 12 - 13954 " Building 13 - 13962 Building 14 "13970 . Building 15 - 13978 " Office - 13986 " • • , • ..Jt ia.M w4n.-.» ..L,A .:.,rl.., I.+ ,,.�:A .M.u...:1 h.w a,.,:.i:•.. '--•....:.b:a ».,..».. ,.e,.wn.nw.k1w.1 pia f, v !I4l7 11421 •, s 11423 ooa ed6 tI { e. ` i !45 1 2 : �a v l7. 11 4' 7 .` C� n d a i n)Lt../y1 , ei., 11429 11431 Bld l A • "2.O(') I . . t 1 • im , 9ck\\6 `xs 0. k D. M t--o If.). � � _. _. ��l � 1169 _ if74 1° , � 1179 8 (,(;• o ' \ `py J 13994 11721 11710 11794 f . t M al'h •A` ' ffi c P c 11743 11732 11790 r T t-' ............- 13�� +�0 ie.! 1178 E L'°,ttI-'ra n Ce. 11765 11754. ' f=E 11782 ? --- �t�` 11787 x.1776 "' �; N 11716 cn 11801 11(312 1 ". . y 'Cafe a, . 1774 I 111323 11834. 11770 P.• { `•f t 11845 11851~ I1 t6• • ` t ' 4 11925 �0 ,(CO V* 0 ' ti) R `w --. _ — . .Pt ^ I •... 1'8/6 2, 1 (i.1" ' rte,, . ._ 1`350 11963 G'/�y. ..��,,,�V+ MM ."' in 1. 11592 11985 �E.. • i ai — I • I I • IL 4 �� .-N-..Iw,.,.i ..d . ,..r .w.:,A+r+>"d.. •.51..,c . .dw.... I-..J. .a5.••-1cw.,,.. ,........,«mri... w+t.w.+vl..'.,..+N wrM..a:µ r.w..r...,,.,..ra.I.u.A3i;..r...-...1..n_:.......•.,-,L�... ..,+C-:ratl:..<-w•i t. i1:'...,:L<..-4i:t..a, • I , • • June , 1991` Mr. P. Michael McDonald McDonald Partners 2635 Camino Del Rio`South San Diego, CA 92108 RE Site Development Review SDR 89-07 Dear Mr.` McDonald: As you recall, on December 3, 1990'the''Planning Division granted ,a one year 7,I' extension of the approval period for the site development review mentioned above. This letter is to remind that certain conditions of approval must still be satisfied prior to obtaining a building or other permits offer you my � � p g g assistance in helping you satisfy these conditions. . nd to � a If you have not read the Final Order for SDR 89-07, please do do now. I The 3?. conditions of approval begin on page 16. (If you do not have a copy of this report please contact me and I will gladly send you one. ) It will take a fair amount of time to complete the conditions of approval. I advise you to begin hisa roGeae as soon as possible, T his will reduce the likelihood of delay y whsn pOu are ready to beg in construction. any questions sat assist you in y Can ad y satisfying these conditions a lease contact meat 639-4111 ext. 390. p -I I l Sincerey, I L Vi Goodwin Permit Coe rdinator t, w ` , �,, lm)"'�' ti ficf 0C: Planning file r) �r e I �a I I vgi;krueger vipc ,:-�yC � } ✓try's �( ry _ I ry l I . y yY Y p • y 'Y • .. _x.-��,4..4r_ ■..-....a ..1,....ral+n...4:..,, _.t. a,a,. .+N: .,.iI;. d.r-..sar.....4...4.m.w:..+...m _,» .,..4.4,.ari_,.»r......,-„w1,.4...�x,r.«:,.w...,.4 J.c.-....«:�.,L.,.4..ar.n..N..+,.«u,o-r...G—.., w.Mm.,.r.a-«.« .r..J4w,r1)1,r-.,,..44,4+e......4J..ri:...=..;.i.. 4- x ■■ ,1�ggq'yyy f 6 +, • (' • 55 '/,`M � ' l'IY OF Fr',1). ', . , OREGO ro _ X41 may 21, 1991 , Mr. Anthony G.. Bonforte ' McDonald Partners . 2635 Camino Del Rio South 1 San, Diego, CA 92108 RE: Site Development Review SDR 89-07 , i • Dear Mr.. Bonforte: As you recall, on December 3, 1990 the Planning Division granted a one yeaz' 1 extension of the approval period for the site development review mentioned above. This letter is to remind you that certain conditions of approval must still be • satisfied prior to obtaining a building or other permits and to offer you my i'' assistance in helping you satisfy these conditions. I If you have not read the Final Order for SDR 89-07, please do so now- 1 The 32 , . • • conditions of approval begin on page 16. (If you do not have a copy of this p report please contact me and 1 will gladly send you one..) It will take a fair. ' • amount of time to complete the conditions of approval. I advise you to begin this process as soon as possible. This will reduce the likelihood Of delay when . you are ready to begin construction. If I can answer any questions or if I can assist you in satisfying these F conditions please contact me at 639-4171 ext. 390 , . Sincerely I 1r. _ I �_.. . Vi Go � � �tdw�n 1 • fl Permit Coordinator , Planning file i Cc; ' V'' P krue erl Y • f I I 4 4397,T� crd,C 131� �'l��±II Blvd.,P.0,Box 23• �'. rogan 97223 (5D3)639-4171--..-..r: 4 r '—ANTHONY G. BONFORTE r •. M..L.r.. r..,M. I4r,. rn .r.�rr,.4-., .-A:r:. .. L.:. ,� r...«. ... ..„ ,., .:« .....r,..a.rl.. ..,,,.,,e_.. ,..w. :.....�.,..r,.+w...rM.W,. ... wu„._w.•.+...J,..J�w_.«....w. Jw. d._rr4«.. ._... .-w:.�.+ rM.m ....i.l.t rxwvwuwY4...axa,r✓..uµ«.. ..-n_.•.i. n.r.r t.n'.r-�•4rn.mr ..�..-.)M.I..r..-..w..,rr�r....Or..,.�...r�. REAL ESTA'T'E DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANT SU!TE 4030 RECEIVED PLANNING 10260 S.W. GRIEENBURG ROAD PORTLAND,OREGON 97223 4 1991 FEB14 February 11 1991 • TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: r, This is to advise you that as of January 31, 1991 McDonald Partners closed its Portland office. Hereafter, correspondence Q Sh ould be addressed to: McDonald Partners 2635 Camino Del Rio South , Suite 202 San Diego, CA 92108 Telephone: (619) 296-1600 Facimilie (619) 296°1695 1 I will continue to be available at the office in Lincoln • Center through the end of February as an independent h consultant on real estate development t n' pleas .y questions you may have M n and �t be t telephone number remains (503) 293-8460 After ( ) March 1, 1991, ; I may be reached at 643-1578. Truly, e/p Anthony 0. Bonfort • I ; • I {I r. , } • _ ....,,k.u..« ..a. MM.�a...i..v «.+,..u ,.r+."' «:r:«..+—.-...M1 ..:lw+ ,,,.h1::w r a4.Ga..ia:C'u..,rr.1»..Mi,:� _„� December 3, 1990 11 Mr. Anthony 'k3onforte CITY OF TIGARD McDonald Partners 10260 SW Greenburg Road, Suite 400 OREGON Tigard, OR 99223 R Pp e: Extension of Approval Period for SDR 89-07, V 89-15, SL 89-0' Dear Tony: We have received your request for a one year extension of the approval period for Site Development Review application SDR 89-07 and associated secondary applications for the Woodside Village apartments. This decision was issued on June 6, 1989. The approval is valid until December 6, 1990.PP .tuber 8 Division' to extend the The Community Development Code allows the Planning . approval Period for a development application subject to the Division determining that: 1) there have been no changes made to the approved development, plans; 2) the applicant intends to initiate construction of the proposed development during the extended approval period; and 3) there have , been no chaangee in the facts or ordinance provisions on which the original decision was based. The Plannin g Division finds that these conditions e,Cist. No new dev elopment pla n has been submitted; therefore, no changes have been made to the approved development plan. Youl request for an extension indicates g in the spring of 1991; therefore, development would occur n construction an intention to begin p during approval pe g r�ur the extended rind. WO are unaware of facts applicable � to the decision such as a aulbstantial. any changes in the of service providing agencies to change in the ability providin provide necessary public proposed P 9 ... � roads which would c�provide access Ptod the site. or No substantive e�changes in ordinances affecting the partition approval have occurred since the original approval. The Planning Division therefore concludes that your l request for extension of the approval Period.. pp - • + , SL 89-03 •and M 89-08 is ents� for an extension. � � an approval period is Consistent with the requla.resn application SDR 1 � The a ,rave, extended to December 6# 1991. Please contact me if you have further questions. Sincerely, 1 ' err of 'Il a lanner Ass �� y c. `Ca rqr � . �, Grab le y; Nl�® 7 . JO: 8oiaf orte let ' 1 13125 SU -Call dP+J x t � ��rI, 4 723 03 �3 -4171 , ✓ A . , I , , i ', k' _., � •. .•1,.w •«..d -.,w:i4,;....•.+ll,.,.'d...,.,.....,,-rw.. .,....�. .».y4M_,n.., ,,... .«d.w ..,w.. ..,�:,.•�,..w.4....Ni«:.,.4�.... ,�.u.o....,..•..i.«, ...d„•:.+'•k�...au.lw,M...i+a«,.,, .,,w•� ....,:�i t+.-5,.. i r M n 1'. 1I I CITY OF TIGARD 1 ' • I : : , . OREGON November 30, 1990 Mr. 2th •�w� r ,� oJ�A. G. �onforte: McDonald Partners • ,. ■ 10260 SW Greenhnrg Roam . Suite 4 0 0 , Portland, OR '97223 Dear Mr. Banforte; The City of Tigard has received the request from McDonald Partners ' ' • for a one year extension of the approval Development roval of Site Level SPiR09-0007. The, City is currently processing this request. Included with the letter requesting*g' acne year ex e� ion of the , approval period was a, check made out' to the City of Tigard the amount of f $4 0.0 0. Although the Development Code makes reference erenoe to , the payment ofia fee amount for an extension request,• P Ym the City of Tigard has set no fee for this aotiona r e City ,is nin the which was sub . Therefore,. th recur �' check �o�.a.tted as the extension fee. • have an estions Or comments p lease contact the City ,of you ", �" `� P Ca.ty of ' Tigard Planning Department at 639- 4171. ' 'S noerel rr i , Ir Ron Pomeroy' Development As stance Platitter I I , • 13125 SW I-Hdll Blvd,',P, o Box28: W ';*tigeri ,Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 ., .t�. ,..:;. .4,it.. , • \I 0 is ■ . ' ,- w....,--.,.:.:c,w „x....,k......,. ....Ire„• ..t.,,+7.,.,,.�u..,.-..,1,.,-:i,... ,,.. p{ (,,, ,„, al �„ Architects,P.C. ;r . • .�,r Archilectuie•Civil Engineering•Development Services•Landscape Architecture•Land planning O Urban Design•Surveying ' November 3, 1.989 Mr. Keith Li en d City of Tigard, Planning Department . P,O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 yVOODSIDE VILLAGE . Tigard, Oregon Project #2233 • , , Dear Mr: Liden: Enclosed please find the proposed site layout for the above referenced project, The project • owner, Villager communities, originally planned to build this project in one phase, but is • now considering building in two phases. , Unforeseen delays have forced a winter time start-up date, and earthwork construction can f .. only take place in cut areas on the site. Prior to plan _ su bmi t_tal, we e would like to have the ppo rtun�t y to discuss ,cuss thes e iss ues with the planning de p , so as to m nimi a an y during confusion the plan r e Please call upon receiving these plans so we can set up meeting time to resolve these I�r ,a .. matters, is Thank you for your cooperation. ' I - • Sincerely, l' • Tox. L: Ra h.buuri. I I , I , I I, TLR:swv/223 • ENC r I i I NOV061989 Lake Oswego Office. 1 e'3b5 S.W.13i)enr.�s Ferri,h',;rk,,a Laku Oswuga,Orc gott 87035.(503)631)...:.3618 , tnnGCutdr Office. 101 East nth atleut r, Vapi;.ouve r Waenln91tari 98600 ,d2qb)685•0857 Way '�" 8 ii J 8'22 4446 Kirkland Office. �;�t<;�:ntret411a t13f,,a t l�Irrfi�i;�rYC9.I�esh�n tar�t�l�t�33 � qt"r i n : g. •• . . I .,ti...,...:. � -,.,W,;...c...e.a.,..A..�..,�:��»„:, �., ,,,.ko.rv-.'.»,.._...�..,..i.1.,..,.-»y_.A:.%::;.,--,:wl�w:1::..N�J,��I...w.wi'....,,w..,_,... .u�4,.d-.,,I..R �-,•..i,,.,M." .rt..i.91++:...�J.., ......ai.h..l..s.,.e...,,=i.-.:-J....:-.,•-• ,� hf — q 1 Cape°� r) %.rd - • • II7 • r f — '' •. .._____' ' ..____ ..s. , eL .,;:o'e' ' :' :: _' '',.;,.g.,,,,,,,41,etirAtv± ' , ..,',:,,f.._ 0,.,,,, ,:_20, ' r�����_'V i. •u 1!� ; ,~ +�( .:. ..' i �'J'• '. ®1.Y, ,'L • • • ■ , ',I : '' . '. ' : '''-- ; ''.' ' : ,.,.,.,, ,'' ,,_— ..., '''' ' : ri.''''''' ' ' ''' . ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' • � i r-A— f'6d j r.,,�� ,_, ._�. .._ o • A[ • ' � 1 1 , : .rte..,........,.. "'I-----+ , y} 1,/:)..,>/: ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' p . i„ °'' :. r..,-. ,n.wri,µ�.r....ur,_.awr,.+ . N.xt... .s. _.. .e ''.' ... wx.«...u,n.wA..µWw,.�.,<.ww.. .....�.�...., A------• Y�„„�,�,y - ,,,.,..w.rm.,ri+•+••�+u,x.w.n u14� '" ,1 w wok w�•w .M_I •'.`r ,Y�.•,�..•w._+✓.. ..w,.Lrr.,� , A , d ,J y%;j r sx,4• MirMF,ru+wN..r,W.15tA!., :.wr.»,..«-,.+swn.n..ta«rn.w<H.A,,..R1.»....H.=::,w.,.;,...4M. ,. rrm..-',.::».a.--.Xw..;-i>,.,,<.u,n..nlr:..w..M—h-uww +nl.+..+-5«w««.Iw.:.w.a.ti.:..s..w:.r,.1,,...i,•wrbn.«.na«...,»=1.+...r..,.,r.,....::.-.f mr:i.«:.,:-:.-.{.+..1.,«.. wn,r-.•re.r,+..n Yan:,a,ri,-....,eLt+w .:.,,..i,,,:..i..:s+.,,,+.4.........,,. • �n Oriva,;a..,Y''f,r,i.;,a 7�1�'r,}}..it�,,: I 1 yY. ' , r",, ki?i'k L.N C 11 a h.la+'yt y L u*,�A'a r TA . ek4 k � » ' ` uY sAyRp t1 �,���t „ 1+1 k i w� it�r"«.4 k I p b s,+,.,1,k 4 /~Jk s"n'ik l>aka„^+a'u1,1 k w' � '.yT a,i}* xr4 Y`4 .)'Aq y” ('i��I.Yu►.d Y A M .• N�CY ,,,,. yt,°'s,:,,,:i a'x,iM1,;v,,,,,,..„‘,.77 tit r1s '.3'.1'.',4 1� yi'Q4n",:4■'b'l K N 11?1i'XA'''lb'y1� {r M1`iK'•6k y JTi,Wy A 1�:. 14 M0 W 1�•u j � IY 3 *.S 14 ,!„S w k t.v•Ir 1 lirf iw"ir r,7 a1 u 4-y • " `4%:;y�+P,�"Y.-'.,:1X59.;Wt Yk "d14 CY:,It : 4' t1!,m rH;«yx,: xya'" ',9 MNN�,na 4 • m�`Wk,r{,'v;ir{'.i5 4i 4."i.yh.s:r�.,"T�k �M1¢�Vyx. ,:A;t • w C I 4 4 Wp ,p ' S''i,{.i T r' ,4 y'i„'^"rat. '} I I I •; N r...��,ai xv ?• ir...A .A Kp� wb s 'kh+'."a$7'J �a�l� ," n���.`�l+r w mark'' �� .,w.A�r '„ ,{.'ci � ; d Noveittber 7, 1990 M•llanaldPartrrers. • ,.; . Ay�,<f�.'wa�."i " r,c'i a: e#f.�.+,gn) Mr.' Keith Lidea t�,�.iM1•a. ;a, :a f r.i\cW.+.rT,,,ttN'T T riti'lI Senior or planner , ( '4S>rr �i.7,+w»',r sm V1J K!$4 a i,}Y7 W"k i'`5L "t Coitlry uniry Develc:)paent Department ' , • § t a,k a.A t, n a•,+. ,.. City of Tigard • � ,.i,+,�. 4 a:}s.i t.',e aY.h W..„1:,arM1 1312 5 S.ds' lall Blvd,. I 'n*^k,'�'1wr,k'},+a1; xkry'}��a7'twj"ra ,1w9 Tigard, Oregon 97223 ' • ' '�'.°C kit,'s45r tka*y n b T SM1'�'r falrr,5,,,tN7 a lk li�i�A• , , i.'i '."'aI,, S;, 4'f,, p;' Re e SDR 89-'07 /V 89'-15 I M 89-08 ESL 89--03. :f'i "l^', Vi9'Ae,Juat?t.,'q ',kiwi , C wF +,ax.,,,.i Y"�.._°a��,I�,Y,.,�"II'4 Y,1�'�* I k am4 r:.�„!a ,i X, Dear Keith, ,J t!p a yr;xi v r l • Y 44f r 4,C i t,i, f� I I I 1 �y ' ra',"s °,''.%. ;''.r.'k , ,r'ur�-' This letter is to request an extension of the , 'r4 Wl r ��yA ' '" 'iw,t'r'`4a referenced Site 1Deve1opmont Approval for twelve 1 i' ,, f,4i„a,� `. ,°'t,' months: Our check for the extension fee in the t t,'$1m.'" hd' l Y r• '4 M'Y`i'nY�a 1di4 s n xF+,4 1, amr ount o, i $40.00 is enclosed o r {_ 1 v iA a.r r ,a ,rSM1 rry1 , R r, , , iF .I .°�"r :''''t Fsii ti�, µ�'.1,""'i��'i�} construction cti©n cf I this project has been delayed ed 1,: • pa iA"u:g.fz� '%,�'fi 'A4„r..3,ii,,, pending financing. It is now projected that E wrgq l A ; Il , °`ar,"�ha, construction will start in the spring of 1991, ; . ' Bl}M,.;�',JU:l a;xx,A,:,r,,' , ro,. Thank you for your. assistance. in this matter.: If I : ' `�;L,', �''1f': i.� r,. . "kM ..•r.... ,.rx,..,F-»...tu. .,µ-a...,. A,.. -........ .,...,,... .,-..-,...uu.,...-.i.x... ««...r.» ..«,n..L..., -.n.... r.Ann.,,-„w..M., r i P:v O IntergovernmentalProfect t Review: Response Forte p, 2000 5,W,First Avenue_ ti Portland,OR 97201-5398 3' r F Q 5 503/221-164 , t4 , SEP 21 1989 To: Patrick J. Reilly, City Admini trator, City of Tigard • Prom. Marls.Tr�rpel, Local Government Coorduiatar. - �'i.....1 • Project Title: 11-11l) section221(d)(4) Woodside Aptts - Tig OR Date sent: 9-20-89 Return to Metro by 10-11-89 Metro file #: ;49-2 • ] reidental Executive Order 12�7 2 and Administrative Rule 120.30.000-120.30.030 allow for ' regional and local review of Federally assisted projects. Metro coordinates reviews in Clackamas, Multnomah and Washington Counties. Comments applicant of • i . . . wil]. be forwarded to the a Meant end �tatc. Oregon Intergovernmental Relations Division. y any q - date indicated above. Call if you have a�a upst�or�:, or cannot respond by the TYPE OF REVIEW: Project '` • ject�,eview I--- -- We support the proposal. it is consistent with local/regional plans and policies. (Explain specific conditions below) • We support the'proposal with co�uditioinsi c ;,i �--- —� We do not support the propose]. (Explain and document your objections below) • ,, I We regmtre more information before completing• o ur review. (P leasespecify information needed as soon as possible) • I J . � ' ti Adcbtaox comments for px ed anforoazan en d improvement are included below. No conuuent. • L�I�AT OZ+i 1 TD COMMEN -f. I �`1 I Reviewer • Phone _ Date Department Address 2.)1t7t, S n , N , • C?Ma llpprOyR .03 -0. 3 • 7J i a YICJ N FOR 2.DATE susmrn-to :a Apont IOrxttltar9r A►SSISTANC�E 8/31/89 . „.,, . ,,PLIED FOR 1. rret of y,,amts300tt a.DATE RECEWED`Y%TATS , S "Jppfcalion adentdaao , Ac&&%Citron PT9aApficar On • • Cc.v ttur"tron 0 r;,onstructroce 1' . ,' •1.DATE RECF.2YED BY FEDERA4.AGENCY Fedadal Identifier • 0 Non-Construction D Peon-Construction • 1. APOl.JCANT INFORMAT ON .. Legal Name: ~' • Organizational Unit: THE PATRICIAN MORTGAGE COMPANY' Address(serve city. county,state,and zip cods): number ot person to Os ontitctsd on matters invoM p this o area ra j SiteM500reet N.W. Kathleen M. Hughes Washington, D.C. 20036 202/775-.9555 1. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 1EINt: T. TYPE Of APPUGAA(T:(enter zpViecinale s�tit School A. State hool C1tst. ' 2 1 4 0 0 1 5 ® County L''State Controlled tnstrtip■te0tt of Higher Learning I. TYPE OF�nPL1CaTIOPI: C. Murnctpal • J Ptrvate Uruvotsiry t1. Township K. Indian Tribe New 0 Continuation 0 Revision E. Interstatw! L Individual • F Intermunistpel RA Profit Orpanit91twn If Revision.enter appropriate tetterls)s't boafes)i G Special District N.Other(SOecily) !IUD approved �. A IrCfCdrE Award B QeCfCASa Award C Increase CJrllio Mortgagee ee � CJ,Decrease Duratott Othe,(smelly): f. PiAS.tE OF Ft:rJEitAI.AGt:idCt ' U.S. Department of Housing and Urban ; • Development I 10, C.ATALOO OK FEDERAL tlOWESTIC 11. DESCRIPTIVE TITLE OF APPLICANTS PROJECT: t asslsTArlct:Nur�aE : Coinsurance• 4 1 7 Mortgage Colnpauy is currently The . Patrician g . � Trrti::Sectorl. 221 d.) (4) Go�.nsuranGe for pzocessincithe�iabove referenced project under. program, J pro'ec, Multifamily Housing � ) ce Thy: J {'.• ' ARL&$AFFECTED eY PROJECT(cities.caMfres.slar•s,•tc.t will consist of u ti a� k�ausin the 221 d t4) co:insurance Y a total of three-story buildings with New Schoils Ferry Road 290 units. Please refer to attace.' . Tigard, Washington County, Oregon 92013 and location maps for further details. 13:,PROPOSED PROJECT: t& CONGRESSIONAL,DISTt1ICTS Of: { . Stara Date, Ending Oets a.Applicant a,Pr t ,, d o Uitkriown —1— ` 1 Unknot,m 1$.ESTIMATED$I„INO1i�l('j: • • te,CS APPLICATION SUIJEC'T'TO IIt:It1E1M lAY STATS 17KICUTWE 00tcelt 022l<2 ►t'tOCESSr a. Federal s ,pq a. YES T ITS PI.ICATIC NUAPPUCAT)CtN WAS uADE AVAILABLE TO THE , STATE IF Et;,IJTIVE OF1,OER 1272 PROCESS'FOF1 RErnENv C71`3 �4 b ActAicatll s 12,347,000 a° DATE 8/311 s 9 • • scatti .1 I i b NO 0 PRCOGRAAA t.S NOT COVERED BY E O I23T Local t .00 U OR PROO14A1,1 HAS NOT BEEN SELECTED BY STATE FOR RE 1E +a ;. Qthor Z .00 Ptogiarn h nl .00 12. is THE APPLICANT PELh 41.iEW t'.!Jl04'4f FEDERAL(dESTT 0 YpTd�l: • — � Vai N'Ye3,'attach an explanation • � No 12.,347,000 td.to THE stsT of MY 9tNt7W1,E,'b0E AND OELIt'E,ALL DATA tN`,tars Aik+i.farbTta04.t+REArF^Ltt"a4tiCfli AFIE TRUE AND DOMED?.THE DiDSEfAt tUs®tEi4 DUI.V 1••i AVIr4C)Piltb ail 0 ...�w..._.�..�' DED . iiT ADft)THE AI�►i.�JAM"f tcftl.L Ct7iaPf.�'t+rrr►i THE ATiACNIt:q A�.tilyiJil�l�a�Ti•�dI..S.S1Si"/At4CE rs l►4n+AA�" THE COVEpAiiwl�nay of te1>G APtdLICA ;; it tvtseil f4arrw bl AaJthoaiaed,Represent 1lree b Tl1ti! C TttltPh0ne ntambit Kathleen M. Hughe Prt �,et~t Anal st:. 2.02/715 9555_ • d Srgrtiature al Author P awesairlletrrne . Onto S*p60(2 , �� 8/31/89 � . r..0$411441 411, iirCRrN tN n'1d74 Pciic'oeo t, °me i• V (12 11. eta • J - . • t `1 ..L_...... _st•-t - ice. . �-� t !•a� 3 t! v Y _ / 1! '- ", 4 -d, C• - Q HA2EC-..,-,cm.— `_ tf. ',7/ - ` r- t w �t -��I''���I r•-'' • ...' ..■':-- — 1_____.-,. .____-_ _ O 1 Cc 1 .saa 1 t �' 1 '>; Q'-� 1- 'iRONv*°* -Ir>z�..�+•� - i, '+ °,.j.- -Cib ----------1---c5 s..,-,. --k- -------- '---1 SPRI)C I - ' - L___f L—pp_ ` 3-L-vu� ` a _ (4( _ - h- Y SCAINGwO'O `.�Y�.; PI" �% �\ ►- TFCOAN. r� ---...\,,, � t p l M (AN rA� —.e--J �� — .11#1� s as Ei rs�: 1 a j / GANtAlt1TA �j�{y1koAxOT � 1 cFC` �C A i• I ✓ ''' 'pSl► w � Sl i is t, t - � PVAFFLE�.: .L r, S‘'.` , _ - tUALHEIGl1Ts� cAEST 1 OA. - ' -: Q w -rte--� _ . - - �t. sUMMt a...Sr. -nugl elf--- - - - _ ,f 1 -� (�... a .. .73,- -: ��- r ' _ 1 � !—� �flp ---- - � � ` Cffvrli I.N.�-'e----....RE � � � 'j ur C r.�� a Y 71GARO ST. L! r_r— 1(y� I „.,(e-\�\)t r 9-. _ _ _ STA.THE.attVE •� .._ . •` .` - - ,/ll'j. \ -� - � -.. , - �7'KATHEal�� 'bE4 - # • � ��\ -s ,. - '.. ST- � Cl1 ov RP 'Jf 1,` - / r• .1 N. .r+_ .•7 IUNIOR ftiGH �o� 4,a _ '7,1,4,,- '�`� � _ -.. l 1 t taAA1 N ST I' h i ` n fiNN'ST. _1� o �� , 4' ----11 .t"`4 dP O 1 �. aaoOta ) �- 1 --_• P`i.` ( '` « S ' ,< Cg x.,,,, � - 1 1� 1jt .. `� a M 2(Ns- .AKTH(SNY /S' �'Q„y \t-''S1` WALNUT / / s �r scH, �/ ......... �' Sy °,4 S,` � ,\'40 J• \ E MARtE Cf. ec 2 — ,-� ,t`,,,t --U e \� '~ S\ a�k�� i ..- E.. -::rt INA CNUT __Y SS . / ,y�r -...,/,/,‘..„,,t.''' SEA? 1 - ,1` - ,- i CARMEN ST. C FCNNEA ST, r T •• 1.> ice- rR' Z t TfCAHfJ SGH... 7l' N �, i - - C t ALBERT,.. ST. : `f, ] e: •„ -�y ; -4t -FAEwtNG - \ a +. FONNER ST,- 1� p y s f _. _..- J DERRY DELL CI.-- (./..--...,,,,\,,,,..,... s -O l `. JAMES R -------------1 0-- 9E� ....4.„,..„,_,,,,t. ►`''. ':E4_ I C9,c'..�>/ .f a eq' MIRA. t l �*# .�►�.or. ..S." t C. v Z: � I. t? / a _ - '` w 1 cOOK� LN. y�` .tl+� - GC .'Ca E �- ti n. � :. (' JJJJJ _- _.( t. �r ... - ST ST_ t : ._j L'--' r�./ ��i a �� {�t^ � * �Q O.- es) v u o'TItARw �J:'� ��'ic r - j 1�e T / F/91RkAV E:�,. 1 S �- f'4�' � -► - ..�.. '; (//7---- FAtaHAV£N ST--7 . ci- I _ ' 4�Y . w SY ,, �• 4 ,,fFA)RV1E.W-LN: ;iL)f I .>z� 1 ` •�tt EOG ST. _V - FAtaHAVcN \ W __ '�� 1 - - - - ROSE VIs TA Q . ,J ♦A, H1itV1EW-sr. r. I •- NtLLVIL.W.C[.. 37TH--N 4 1 , _ :b /- •_:,.., } YIEWd10VNT r¢�. .�,l � - _ z x -- E.7-.�- :E ST cEM 1ON }::• //'� - 3-i a ,� t J ct. ( t., . . zasa. �� __ � OOntALO __ST_ , t�_[f t l� TOA: pa: 9-- 20 GAARCE- ST..ui J , P ,� _-a) i 1 [pRlF vttt)D CN. ^ fLROSE' _ a t_ 1 1 > 1 kIL . - Z C �' Z 3w:11tG1i ",:RLSA_„- -,!! + _.,C W M t.:titler••F: ~ A �._ t- �L.. �. .f� I 1----7---;";::---7-* w9 1 r , ,...._,q-t. _ ._.- _ - I: 1-/' . u/ t- I_____7t)C K Si. _ _ _ ' 1 r. //j er.t..._� --_ - _ VtNhlfl,rt•.r •,t 1 '. iI _ _3 q Z _= Gft.�� Tfff►tFtfitx�t 1_ _ t- �. - -- h 1 .... ) - : ,,,,,,i5:1Y.,,,:;"'.,( ,e. ... - - ..L---•.... . V _- ■ .KAALL -i.ST 1 t. ,1 �o�s .. :� -is p - - a r a • 4- '''-7•4‘''''•:•••.>p.yy • ,........,,W•1•'14....--_a„C-mss arc 3 1 dd% �`:--3,L•t 'f ` • �t�t21 - ..¢ -.S. O' ,:r r[f n•iiv''----4-...i.:.--..._-.rr� .. - - - urtoo e 1 i, .. .`,7 ^1�j a .° P,. ;.•` 'r ..• " 14°M e5/ _ � Q oe. tarn <. 4 ,{1, , s� �,- c '1117', • Sot i'O wr r.4 t • ` wcurN sr o Q'�,os _Prairie Foik nber a'+, . \.' .- - w', 1 z Sicidybtt>vlc � 3 st .; 1 t ber ,r,`f; '+n -- ..1.. „A- co '.. S w,e. :,,-...:(.-- ••,o •fig _ ''d I ! �'i•. .f LaFr `r:6 .. .. ..y'1 r- r ■wurc -iscus .-+ m,i l:vfryrei:t larkrt.-rsm-_ °~� _e `!°- ( FF Millet+ � r-��,+' �. ` <�c`f.>�, �•: °s-o __�TI MKS°�-�rw -R..• fiatd: s i r` -•.Cparli0f. at.. C' - --t-'• - i:.. _ - 4A - - [ISiH sr i (--'-- r`� n i�OPt�i 4 F:.•r vy c_ aXy _ • - _. R:Y+- ^r.� •. .E r 1-' - � t:� _ bFt l�^-L'J', $ 'T � lJ07r� _ _ r'�aV r�� _•t _ 1 ( _ defc t, Alii�i=� - •Hdvetta; c ,_- -'-'1"- ' 9 v j >r , -'i '''' �? .,.w,r,.,.- ,.,,t�,w .._...„.,.�+,.�.....,.,l:. ,,t,7L,.� we,.H.., ::. ,�,..4-..,...k�:.., - .,,..+.�:.........,...9... ,...., ,.,. .,....M,,...::F...• +..��„„.4�. w-b—�A+•,.._._t i ., , �• r.. . PlOiliONINIMIIIIIIIPM1PIIIPIPIIIIIMR- NSW• J•.d �� �a,„ .. ..rte r��11PL • , f• 1 , , Su bi , eC t r • 6 ; .I. • , gam , ��0 l$ Q M 142 X !44 • er a R11 T; j "KS • • 11340 ' Z , , 4.........-q a. . ,. • r 14ca� r .' . , , . ic., 2,.".1 i 14,6 •' 10 115035) OfJ Q9 ' g 147 1374, ( • $ v 11 p44p ti d 1� e 1 s°'�1• a Ir. Qt DTdSt '��i F A/19,$:,,3• 01h 1C dA Ds $ D34 Aye �,. I It10 ' • 101tiX7 1• Dsl A 1. • '•• •• leeee[rt♦ 104M? ,as" air e A►1l.fA 1 °7.a tat r I • e s A!. 400 ,�. Jam'.. �; 1F , .d041� ':s 1114 1 1 ,' , , , 4. 134 �Ar 13d 171:)C).: s D5 tea.., • S y ,000 Ir100 .o. •• it !1113 i 11d x 1i w ' .. a d`a, .• it.... W 'r' .. AAA .,,�� -01 • ,,•• 01100 • 15 . 111 it 111 ns lit _ � 11401'0 n.�.M..�s M•. .r.ova ,: i • ap. , , , , , , , , , , , ,, , , , 1 , ..,, , , , . 1. , , ,,, . , ,,,,, . ,; , . . , ... . ., . ., , , „. . . , , . . ,,.. , .. i . , . . • • . , , , , . . , . . , • JJJ e '�I tea SITE IDESCRIPTIOI`d LOCATION The Woodside Village site lies on the southeast side of S.W. New Scholls Ferry road, approximately 2,000 feet south of its intersection with S.W. Old Scholis Ferry Road. The site is immediately north of the intersection with the proposed Murray Boulevard extebeion and south of the intersection with the proposed Davies Street extension. Poth extensions provide additional access to the Murray Hill area, and Murray Boulevard is to extend further east thru 135th Avenue to connect with S. V. Walnut Street, providing access to central Tigard. SHAPE AND SIZE The Site Survey map on the facing page shows the location and shape of the saJ ec b' �t site. The site is irregular in shape, with approximately 600 feet of frontage along S.W. New Scholls Ferry Road. The total site area is 14.59 • acres, as shown in the architectural drawings submitted. This land area is III net of a 14-foot roadway dedication along, the full length of the S. Y. New Scholls Ferry Road frontage. •The ,site area does not include, however, the 1.0 acre Daycare :enter parcel adjoining the site at its southern road 01 frontage.. w a y mi.oad with 600 feet 'T'he site is bounded oat the west by S.`�V. I�Te�r 5choils ��er�r ilit distance across the site is street frontage The maximum north sautlh dust dxic°e air . 1300 feet. The maximum cast west distance, as measured from " approximately S.W. Scholls Ferry Road through the smaller comrrmuytity building to the property line o with the Sunflower apartment project, is napproxima . M feet. The site has an acceptable configuration for y multi faanily residential site � l development. TOPOGRAPHY .q . t ry The site is characterized by a general gentle downwards slope to the o, ill northeast from the site's high point of elevations of 225 feet near the '°` southwest corner of the site. The low point of elevation is at 184 feet at • the northwest corner of the site The slope is centered around a shallow Swale, which accornrnodates stoats runoff. The st'orifl runoff is slated to to be The �j � dings: tend to extend parallel to the swale avoiding the trench. cr slopes in the siphoned off into a storm sewer system by a p 8 P � terrain. The site's " terrain is conducive to dervelopntent The gently sloping terrain i , x g . buildings at slightly varying, permits the siting of the. bua rying floor elevations, an ° iii important factor in creating visual interest and a sense of separation, While g only . g K. g . e� ta lirl onl a modest sate tailoring program. ,.nl. According to a soil investigation co,rnple•,ed in January of 1989, by John McDonald ,Engineering, the entire site is suitable for supporting two and three story big#ldings on spread footings: More specific recorri ' construction are located ire;t in a copy of the report included in the addenda. . i at iiii P P aendutions for comstr . 28 i : rya • • 0 . (-:,,,, c.,, d, SITE DESCRIPTION IDRAINAGE The natural site drainage flows follow the northern-sloping contours and II drain into the swale. A public storm sewer line will be extended from the southeast corner of the site ite a ong the southern and western boundary to S.W.' c. New Scholls Ferry Road and from the southeastern boundary with the Sunflower apartments westward to S. V. New Scholls Ferry Road. A system of private - storm sewer lines will extend from the public lines to the various buildings on site. The majority of the lines will lie within either street right-of-ways of or under recreational open areas. The drainage plan has II been submitted to the City, but not yet approved, This appraiser reviewed the plan with City planners and no obvious problems were seen with the plan. SOILS. lt The soils investigation by John McDonald Engineering determined that the soils appear to be Verboort or Cove soils. He felt the entire site could ' n+' support two and three story buildings. The engineer specific t.�: , gives s 0 , the drainage in the. swale, aixcg both building .; recommendations for handling en�s lying in within the . more clay-like soil of the foundations and road sysfi y g w y swale. Clay soils can be more susceptible to expansion/contraction with ti changes in moisture content. Essentially, the engineer feels the entire site is developable. proposed e assume Woodside Village complex can be constructed using assume e that the p conventional foundation and structural systems. If the results of a soils or Igeotechnical report tor the subject discloses otherwiseq we reserve the right NIto amend this appeaisal to reflect the actual soil and subsurface conditions. STREET As stated earlier, S.W. lNew Scholls Ferry Road abuts the site along approximately 562 westerly property line,. S.W. New Scholls Ferry , the westerl Road is classified ast a Major Collector street by Washington County and is iiil presently irnproved Ass it abuts the subject as follows: ... •. Total right-of-way width: 62 feet., ;. Travel lanes: Two, bi-directional lanes. •Travel lane surface: Asphaltic concrete Travel lane width: 13 feet. Total travel surface width: 32 feet. Median ntrance to the subject. On-street parking. Not permitted, Bike lanes: no, , Curb and gutters: Dirt shoulder with drainage ditch. n Sidewalks: None Landscape p pe Stri None. Street trees: Mature fir trees, west side of street. ii Street lights: No 29� t • ' ��I�III�l1�2il,C N1x7:1raraxn - .. ...w._, ...».._....i. ..._.. -,»,...�. _..•..._ _ ...,_..a ,. ..._„,ti.w»,...,m... .,,.1..w.• u, l SITE DESCRIPTION STREETS (continued) S.W. New Scholls Ferry Road, as presently improved, does not meet County IIII A standards for a Major Collector street. The County will require the following dedicati i ons and roadway improvements along the S.W. New Scholls Ferry Road frontage at the sole cost and expense of the developer. • 1, Dedication of 14-feet of depth which will bring the total right-of-way y � width to 76-feet. 2. Construction of a concrete curb and gutter at the easterly edge of the new street right,,of-way, and the construction of a new road pavement ,,' I section between the existing pavement and the new curb and gutter. This improvement will bring the travel surface width to 50 feet. 3. Construction of sidewalks and planting of street trees along the S.W. New !' Scholls Ferry Road frontage in front of the subject site. ■ L.� S.V . New Scholls Ferry Road intersects with S.W. Old Scholls Ferry Road II approxirnately 2,000 feet northeast of the subject. The intersection was improved in May 1988 with left turn lanes and a three phase traffic signal. S.W. Old Scholls Ferry Road is classified as a Major Arterial as it serves as a primary route between southwest Beaverton and Highway 217. Murray 7Boulevard. and Hig hway'g way 217 are two of the major north-south arterials in the , .• . \ area and Old Scholls Ferry road 'intersects with both. The County plans to \ ' divert present traffic flows front S.W. New Scholls Ferry Road to S.W. Old, Scholls Ferry Road by realigning the latter to ease traffic congestion. 5.W'. Davies Road is to be extended from S.W, Old Scholls Ferry to S.W. New IScholls Ferry Road and S.W. Murray Boulevard is to be extended through both S.W. New Scholls Ferry Road and S.W. 135th Avenue and on into Central Tigard. Future plans calls for a new Western By-Pass to e: end from I-5 below Tualatin to the Sunset Highway (26) in the vicinity of Cornelius Pass. This expressway would allow the subject faster access to Tualatin-VVilsonvillc and to the Sunset Corridor. 0 ......... i ACCESS Specific Site Access The development plan shows acccs5 drives from S.W. New Scholls Ferry Road: The main access drive is located app south of the ° ' : y si nialited intersection of S.1N. Old Scholls Ferry l Road 2,300 feet W. New Scholls g "° Ferny Road. The second y i is located approximately feet north of • ara access act Analysis of the y project prepared b _ the main entry, The Traffic ff p y p .! ittl in March. f .1989. hand turn lane at ' . N c�so n � �rs . the main , buts otherwise indicates no recommends t ffic pr blems afor the project entry, or caused by it. The location of these two access points permit 'a safe and Convenient site access and circulation pattern. Site access iI considered III good. . 1 0 t „.. SITE DESCRIPTION General Area Accessibility verton's "South Murray orridor" enjoys good accessibility to the major Bea y piemployment centers, shopping centers, schools, transportation corridors, and recreational facilities in oast Washington County, S.W. Murray Blvd provides access north to downtown Beaverton and the Sunset Corridor, while S.W. Old in Scholls Ferry Road provides direct access east to Highway 217. rill TREES AND VEGETATION x _ There are a number of mature fir trees in the northerl y portion of the site, and a mixture of fir and deciduous trees located along the swale, several of which will be retained as part of Woodside Village's landscaping plan. The Ill balance ,of the native vegetation is grasses and berry vines which have no, landscaping value. alNUISANCES AND HAZARDS Our inspection of the site and its immediate vicinity did not disclose any neighborhood or site factor which would constitute a hazard or nuisance FLOOD }IAZARD The Flood Insurance Rate is/lap (prepared by the Flood Insurance Agency of the United States Department of Housing ' covering the saib'ect site (Community Panel 410238 0504b C, revised Development) 18, 1987) gitates the entire 100-year site as lying in Zone C which is outside the limits of any -y flood plain. UTILITIES AND UIRBAiki SERVICES The subject enjoys the full scope of utilities and urban services Utility/Service,, r vo r TVve„ Electricity Portland General Electric Private i Water City of Tigard Public Sewer United Sewerage Agency of Washington County Public Telephone General Telephone . p elephorte Colnpansy Police and Fire City Of Tigard Public The public sanitary sewer mains will extend into the site from the south to the north along Private r the the xvrale: Private laterals will be instal . :.. . Led under • g ill be necessary to internal road system_ and recreational. open area, It w dedicate utility line easements, and pay for construction of the lines before j the municipality Will accept responsibility for maintenance, The water main connects will serve the Woodside Village site consist 'ores that a .. g the .... i i.:i., through L, and connecting to a ma the private road system e site under t e r d to the east tin in �. the std ui' of two extending from the CotsWaid Meadows subdivision i p n T" mss. - -. _ I - - lig -Nirdr , .., --. .. I - - t ' - ' ilL......* ,,\,,.,,..t t - j I ./ . : ' immit, Big , , , ,,,, \ i. , j - = : --7------. IIIIIIIIIIETAIII: i 1 , ' �a aav'ta t tr'41141 }4„,„ p.,_, iv :g :t. ! ,. . ,_,i i a YCCA !iii!!! i� �. _ .. slli1lk'®t it � : . 41111.1F--- Mil i _ I. Ego kLLiisivi % i/� 'r N , !WIWI Raul ; - -- --, f j e • . avail .1.1 . ,: ,c77z - . I, ., immiiiiirior .,, 11.,p ,t s ' ♦ /4e r t A i Nl-4r #i i,0` Lit,' . _' ! ;;:'.a L ii � 1.1 ' , a) - . fosiiii ,., (31 ifilt..'.04../.„Nta,stait,'I'llal., is..,=.1-___,,,,,1 i #:=1'4,''..°1#. .,„tii,Nt-. - -n " : lilt ' - . !,0 1 j iliih� ! ,s' ® ∎111In®�� 1301. $ !p i -- tt , aliiivais 1.-. . IliffP,,....Ali 1 si,r4-1_,11 ,I...,, .,,,:,- .,--,olivir4 11;illgi t 'I AY a C12Ii : f'� .. *� 4%7 - .� 1�1ta�tiei (A •f �11t®1,IJ flII jai : 1 a ® ' It .' it M. 0r= 4t Illkil '' ' iiiiii - . R - e■••• lit 1: I. i i'' c.--1 • "4, 1 Nino wirgatib.N1,0•Iti`l!twilpt 111NRI 0!•.mpt,46.,.. gui Aii, al-. = 1 _ .111 .1-_].(;'.4iis I-. gual ER II la E- „mF4Ii,k'filik.,,,_7-111111D_Ilititi""•,..1 '1' _id. 111111' am' - ' - - ' ' lilt In Nuesimaro- - - _ - f — -- ,...-.— _ ......--...„ I.., ..--.....5.1 . ip,....... r-w. ,------ ---. — — ---- — —, --- , ....----, [ -_ - ma r.1 a 1 i r t 5 i iNt iNt 1111 in it 11111 1111 ilr! L II ii n ii - IN - . ' ___ ____________ ______ _ __ ___ ____ _ __ . __ _ _____ _ .. , - . [. - - - _ . , Q ` . ' ' '` . ' . `. , � � • . . ' ' . `� ` ^ ` `' ' '• ' . . ' ` � '� ' ' ` ' � • ^ ' ` - • ' '^` . . . ` ^ . ' ` - ' - . ` ` � . .~~ .' ` ` ` ` , . ' ~ ' . ' ' ' ' ' '` • ' . a • WEI - - • .-•.. I..,..%,,„,.. c....:r: 0,. .E-."'h -..-allIFIE,'-':- .9 1-'7%. - . SliC sEction A ,.. S.tt sy:titirt . ),_ • .0,,...44,44x, =raliii.....„n.p. 'Pa-r../417.. :_------...s ''- .."-‘1:112:171"_;-11'.1.-. '----' . Oft _ - .'7 :`,,-„„1, - pi----.•‘ .rimilivi-- .,,,. •til-ii-, -„ 4.--7,-11,--' ii,.. '. I -_b., '.. -A ., - -at-6-■•■•1 ilia: 61- .. .•-,t..1 . ,-- )---•,..Im.rt Mo.. ,aMPIN■.:,....... . 90. 4n . • . ,...... -., ' -fikSia",,a7.:*41114;-...h, 4ii* ,...- ...-. ...,j1 -,‘ -.•• „,_.l'"',. _..,ill ... y ,,, sr . i -'.7•- .. ..., ' -..." . • . .. .7. ;‘,. ,, . 1,;,,..-r:iii., .'• ''''.-.4'.411.1k...r. -'-A,.._—..44114. . ......c..-::,4,:!.. ..7.---1.'.741/4.i,:Y.*: fill.it 1.'„‘„:..„:. . - :...:7:.Ijk,o t.:'::,...."..:::.maw ti--*---. .--.>„,_... . '' 1-:..ft.Igri. ,i,_,,it-,.1.1 . , -- ''N.: ''''' . -- . .tr- - *41110, 7±-4' ' -10 :- • . '-.....f:1? .- - 1,1:11:r.iick. .ii,,,..1...:--•!. t. 1:-; • :‘t,• -:----- • •-„-.•...-..- •.- .. ',-----_-- -:'.,":3!,14 ' ' * - ' 4:' -,; P. •.•• 411°4,... .. .- *i.e.. 1; ...* . i 1. ' ' 41. - k ,-- - . •. --:. - :.,- —T?—if-1,—",rs' :4- NW t w II .-J:*7NA) : . ' . :-- ' :-til-; ' - '-- . ' 3---.-14'-, 71--'. !,- - .-_•,' -''' -e. . . ... ..„- • . , L..... . —_—. . ,- _ .:,,, tt.-- '- . '14• 'I." ..-.41-*.-_,.-', _AP-- -40---_-- - A r.,--+__I_Iiei - --'•- L-' ''''s .;kri•-2..111- 4.c r -;41,,..4. rl'ir.=.- It'''''111'-' '--,k--I 0 '1.- ar-1 - Si ilti•• . •-. • ,-Is, •....,--No".•_.,.--:.. . •- ., - -. . _ . ...it_: .- .ri-l- _ - L. -. •rt v k-.: .....t...1-.1.1-111..1k..x. -- F';',‘ t-11,% . ; 41:1116.___•-■-•• '/.7. •..'7.IP. -- •., - i... _ .,-- ..'. .,--'7%-lid,Z‘...:1; .. - ,. : .-.'4?;.1. 4-..A;„ --1-- * /4 ill -1 ir ., 5._ -Lc • . . - ''•L'' . -5 ,._. :-. • Vi'S■•■',.:' 7..%' s. . -4`--Aigt-- - -----1...-''.11*.'''i '••— ' .., -At I‘l'it AI t.AR.A..I 4,e.j . ;";-6.....1';.- ., " - .. -"l'itrii*4'1!t'..E.• - ''.; .-: LSITIL SEC____,11014 .1 1 7.-"r'7-47.4-4, 1- :I' .. SITE PLAN - woOl)SIDI. N ILI AGI.' Otak .. • - , ... . - ., •-• . , . . . -. . . ... . • ' . . . • - . - - -- . - .. -. ' . •- . . . . . . . . _ • - . • - • -.. . . - . . • - • -" ' ' . . . . • ' -- - - - -- --- . „ . . -- . - --- :-.. •_-i- 1111111-t. -- - 1:-1111116--- 4 -41.,, - i 4.ibu - ... 71. ilk , . - . 1 ..,.: 0),. V),t• l N).141 .'- •.. ."• . .'a:Ali• -04' ------,. t, ..,-. N.,•,. r. - -*- -- i•it, .;_iiiiim..,••-/,.„. , , 1..!.... •••_:,-.- 11161,.16,,- ..-_1 ' ..- . . .. '...- imr.- .... _ .. il.%.- :---101.1■1-:-. '..1 "II-.2.- 4:1::_i ---mit - Km ...., -. , = ; t= _ - -Vat -, - SIVE SECIlOtt A Siff SECTiCsit 9 • _ .,. I.- -.VW 4...e.Z.,....,.. .,,• ., 1_7.-7,-,..- ' a•-a , : ..,-------------) I ) 4:Mint, ' 7 i • 1 v !......, .,_.:.„aiiiait.-:.;.,....-:1.•erttINA_-4:-......,.,- '-...-'-': .. - -*L' iiit'llr-": ''''''.. e. '''..'',lir:.-11: 7."IRS!°.:t.". i - .: --.. - : 4'....11-1-----. '''-' '''':4111111::' -4-..'":fi-i".-'::::'-' ' ' - i ,.._ .... _ . .... , _ i... -• --' lift•L .. , AN 11. i'f i .' -. ,, , ,- ...1 a ••7 - - . - ...e. ..... . - - ..r.-- ,,,,,i ,,,,,,, -....# :.;..., _.. ...ii.......,,,..., . rell, ..-71-- -S 0 . .■) ' I ' • ' ' ' '- - -- • ' - 4, YRIErill11111ff - -,-- - 1 _ . .. .- -.r. -..-... .-..... ,_ 1111L:411, - .• ___ k, •, ::L',-_ ..iN1c-&----..:*,,,fr.,--.--.. -,.------... _., - .- ..;i .,,,;. . ._.,....„,.., ., -.7.,:ti:, :p--1.. _ .,.,.,.......,,,,.., - ,,,, .,,..,. , i .....; ,,T ..,61,....4,.... .,..x...,,,,3,„- ... -11,„'1..... - ,•-_,.. II%..; 1 ,.1.4 IR i .....,.,,.... ' Itp............... " •" I JP.N.,•...■:: 1. . . . MI. :"'Zig.... '.,•'-';,''',.-..... 1,t. 't:.ZW 1 At._4.fair . .--, 1 ,„i 1 ,,t, 4 4 ...., I., . - • .',.------',11---• . . 62-.-?Amit ailia - -.." - -- -- II ;--INI•ir •.-7.t. . ri•'tfA4":1"" -M•1*. • ,..f.C.- -la • '4 ":- ! 1------- - , • f ;s_ -'-' 4':'.--4 - i':- ..-'.'4F'`7 --u'...--"- -.7 -- --- °- 'di''''7:'.-.- A ' ;-4;. `'-',;•.-.:41'-3,... :4.1.1.1 .." I' .atili..,14701-!-f iii•-'1 .1, -' • 1 II .-t-1 1. I., • - . - ? . 14010;• .. .-%,. . • 4., '-- ‘ : ..,.#.11---.4 -,..••••i- ....a . -.. ..,- --;,!-.1,, k,". ti,24,4m,lifi, ..„,„ ,,. .,... - ._ - - -% • ,.„.• -- - .5/1- . : I - ,,,'--,40, , - , .,..-..._':-.. .,..-101 ---. -: . ';:-- - - 4. . ,"7- -'...--n'. '.-. 31 .- - - ' r ilateftr .411., I Irvi.3 • -1,•• •''-?-„,'...•- -...Ark ' • „ ".'. . -"•.;. et-, ' .-•vriEtr. •••diii . 4 -.‘..4.-.si ' , '..) . - ;,.. . .. -, • . -, - ..i....-. _ .. . vil . .....,..•,..Ke.syri:. . , J,,k;i..-a_i_.z--i.k. :j,,k.:, - .i,4,-, I-.--4, ,4. 4.1, 41•-. -, -- .- . ,... fr.A.B.... .4,-' _ - ..„,,.,.:,r , Tr• -. i. •ie. - - -11; '.- = '5 '' -57'-.',. V" ,:, ,,,v... 1--Niii;i142zu.. .--'4) -., ..- - . . .--..--.-, -47_ .f.). #." .9% --, ,' 16. .-!'(.- -imp. - •,71.-,:i -. ,,,,C.- '1,,. "--,1 1 1- - ..I'I 111-1- - - -14 ogv..:1 . -.. - - - ,t.- % 42... '-=-- 1:.,• - ck‘. --, - ..• --4„.._, -_ ,:, - .-4 . ...-1 ,,,,:.,--.,...„2-K* A..,• ,,,qj ',.,-- '-'11 ! 1 1.•"41..'1., .%:,1 .__ I •:-‘f-t, ---,-- '"Ij.J,7t.--PLA;AREA ' --.... , mi.'.,_ l'••k. .19 4. •-,.- ' -t•,,,,.--- ,-- "-f- _....-..,;i ::-.1141:. . .. . -.,' ).- -I- - .i..; -• tr.s-il* : 1.1,1.' '•I-!I•- --' ..--;-:11‘,:,..--:.:---.1,--1:,-... :-.-;•••.-•-..-._- --..- .,....,ii,...:--.-, '...',.:1';', • - i- --••_.- - . .,-. - . . - -- 4,4. . NIT-. - . 1.. iv, ' 7,-antiwar ' 4 Ah„ i. ....... . , -,..; - .., ,_. iv.. .. „4.) ,-. 41Ptfp.,..i--;: -.... -°;t__14. -,.■ : :: .7 i-,•- ..:•-.4-4-•- ."-.1-.-.•=:,-.-•:. INt•li waif sMillilhladlili 2'-6.'"';2 .4.- - - '' .-- :....•f .' .i._ - ' •-• •••1!"-; • --,. --IP- 77---...-.-1 `7: ik.,,4-. --....,.. .."4-- _ ir-,i I " - . ..i. ...• E!.. ----..1'......: ti::7...-_:=5.4; -,11.---4,.:i......, .,- , law '. -i . -' .. ,- .-31. . ,".•;'--- , 1"---0 - LI _, -.... - . -. -. - -,Fh .f -1 -- ,.. .3-._ . .- . 1:.....,-e 4.,,,,!,_ .....-, - - . .,. .... .. . . , _ ..., .,...,-, ..,_ ,,., .. - „,..1,- ...* .1,..-.-„...„ s-...-.„,,,,- .. ,_-,,,,,,...,t.-„_.-,..5•'t ' -.44-....,,L. ..- --• -,I....,.., -1'*•- .4...",'"' -; ' I'. 1' , Aim.•-■.., „ 4 _.'''•_ -..4,- .. -.- , ,, ---:-_ . v,.if It --•. •t i.,- tai'it .--"'. -•-.1- -'.' --- ' - " -I. . ' 'Pm 4. •-''•••• -- 4 .41b* -.-. ' :- '- I 1-At ' . . '.1 -.--• ' " a . - -4 .-!--- 'A- i- _ - ' ,.1 s-014„,,,-. ■-. -,,:Ajpi-,,,_,,,..‘„. ,49 . . -.. • - -. - -- t . -• tr- 44-_ .. - - .Pri....T.....--44E-9%, 441 ,i,- ...;--- • ,-, , _ . - -...- . - •t__ -• - 0. - . . - ..1. - - r, ., I kr „ - • 5 ---- , i.-;• -.- •:,` ''-(4-• -- - --;7{.., •'1,k••- -- -Y - -, ."‘"1-- .:... ....-....P ... 7-- t ....i. 44;".".".. .6.........12) It s.-::---. t- ..-- . -- -,.- 1., --1144' .. -•i: - -',-4-t-Ir. 4 . .Iit ' •lip ,Ot• . , tt- N'-.. -.• r.4,7i. :.... - .,, .- el I, -..- , :V ii,,••■■_,Jr-• , 74111, rs Pic Al tAtit%I.I 111•11 ‘I t \I:1,W I le 14 ■• - '-',-;-.4iF., . „ Ir ".4--N._ , . 5 1 .•4?.'11;.,t. .. -.i # if-,.4. .: •ri'z;-- ,. I E OA IP' lift SECIIIDMI■„1 , • - •-... / '.--,- • .-r-1*. - • rr, •-,,=,• i Nit :-,.: •./4 . • -...,,.•.;: ..N. - .s, . .r - ..,- ,_-4-.--•- t- . -...) ... -* -• - . --:;'..-7'',;--1.,, •- .- . SITE 1)LAN . -••- ... - • ...-r...n.................. ,..-4-11 I,t I----i - :- ..I, -- 'i N..'.'','''''''''''..'-'-•,'t.- ... ... otI are ftla W001SDE A . .. .. _ ak 1-- ' „.... . . . . ,. . . . . ., . . . - , - -. - . - •' n.w:,'+.nx..u+ ..i;.. ter..,,.:♦._.a,Y,...•r.....in...+u..-u..... .0.1. - ....,.�._L L F H- .... ,._u. .._. ......... .....x. ... J.t...�...., ....._..�va..-.. .. .»w.-1.. .- .r. nN ..+ r.. ,r..rr ... -rm«Ih.J .F+:..-l.r A ' b ( N �1 r ' SITE DESCRIPTION UTILITIES AND URBAN SERVICES (continued) I New Schoils Ferry road at both entries. Water service to the 'Woodside Village development will form a loop connection between these mains. ITwo public storm sewer mains will serve the Woodside Village development. jr One extends from Cotswold Meadows at the southeast corner of the site along the southern and western boundary of the site, exiting at the main entry. second public main will extend from the Sunflower Apartment site west > The towards the secondary entry. Laterals under the streets and catch basins ii i will a be installed. This plan is demonstrated utility plan on the ated on the site utili g p The sanitary sewer, water, and storm sewer mains are of a size and capacity sufficient to accommodate the Woodside Village development. r Electrical service and telephone service are underground in the planned development. I ZONING l r I' The Woodside Village site lies in the City of Tigard's R-25 zoning district. ii The purpose of this district is to provide for single family attached and low to medium rise multi-family units for medium to high residential development. This zoning allows 25 units per ._ore'i the proposed III development is for 290 units or 19.5 units per acre. his i density is more typical of suburban develot)mcnt and falls well within the xonrag ; r requirements. \' 1 Site Development Requirements for the R-25 zone are: 1' Minimum lot dimensions: • � Width None depths: None ;stated Minimum setbacks: Front: 20 feet Side: 10 feet on one side. Rear: 20 feet for dwellings. Corner: 20 feet on each side facing a o l street. Others Multiple family dwellings abutting a more restrictive II use ,on side or rear yards 1 reclui're'a 30 foot setback �.inim uin lot size: .r , Single l manly detached: 3.050 square feet. A NI g family 3 0S0 square feet per unit Single fannil attached: 1 fe p e . ,' ,; 00 �gtia�re feet. Boardi n rooms 6,100 s uate feet. 6; �d .:.. Duplex:g� .a� house,: � Multi-family: 1 480 sgiiare feet per unit. , f � ..r r Y ,/�■zh.. ,:'qr.Y,.. E e Y ii d ai , ,0 SITE DESCRIPTION ZONING (contlnrled) IMaximum building height: 45 feet, without conditional use �permsit. Parking: Studio unit. I covered space 1-2bedroom unit: 1.5 spaces (1 covered) 5+ bedroom unit: 2 spaces (1 covered) ■� 1 ..,err•+".. � ... _ ,. ,. ... .,. n I ' � I I I. ' I I I I i I i i r I ;I,M A \''k....t a ', Route 1 Box 390 Beaverton, Oregon 97005 June 29, 1989 Mr. Keith Liden Planning Dept. CITY OF TTG RD • ., 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. • • • Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Mr Liden: • • I hereby .grant a fifteen (15) foot easnent along the north side of my pro ,.rrty line for the exclusive use of sanitary sewer and/or storm sewer. Thank you for your attention to this important matter. ' I Sincerely, . . , Marlin H. Hopfer To* . 0 e Data Time___ �_ _.. _ ., WHILE YOU WERE ., JUL 0 5 1989 n 191 _ t" a . -Pho li'e._._,��. — rr, A N « TELEPHONED BLASE CALL RETURNED YOUR CALL WILL CALL AGAIN ., WANTS TO SEE YOU RUSH • i . . ,, f essage c ° ca ,' nil ,. • ...r"' r iW' • i. it it s " Pte. 1 , ' .,, 1?..e7'.,_ent::Pi!lei__.6.__,,,.. .E.;!1,..5.Je:i4i.eiz,erc".6P- 00 , , O :. AVM' AA G pd- 57 4xO r . 7' oe #/04,1 ig.AV iti 4 e:.7'Attleill td(IIV"I ,., "-_" O E Imo a'.r i t .4,1 61! a •. . x,...d7 ,1.....,w....+:..1. ,a,+...„M.wy .:A�1Ma..,.,....•a„w..-.,,,....dw.Yw. ..c,::G....la.,l.,. ..a.n,.,,...ti.,,,;.+,n+.b.,. ...,6.oL1.»,M�.t+w,..4.,.,a..;,,'+i.,.,..,1.....,•,...ra....�_al,w.f,.-<�.:a:.a,...,..ti„a-...w .«,Mw,.-.......—rVi:.,.4+•.w......»� ri:a' 1p■+ / ,:xc 1 (4,,... Route 1 - Box 390 • /' Beaverton, Oregon June 16, 1989 • Mr. Keith, Laden • City of Tigard Planning Commission ."w -.+�rL�ei�llla 13125 S.WWT. Hall ]3lvd l UN 9 P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR. 97223 Dear Mr. ]rJiden: This letter is regarding the Woodside Village Apartment carplex being a g planned for construction on Scholls Ferry Road, Tax Lots 200 Map #1S1.33CR. I am �.1 hereby making the folMowing requests 1. That a sahita.ty sewer line be extended to rrry property line at the lowest point of elevation on said property. line • 2. That a storxri sewer line be extended to my property line at the lowestL point of elevation on said P ro erty line. 3. That pu blic water be extended to my pro perty litae. . 4. That an adequate fence be extended the length of my property line to keep my property protected frzn possible liabilities. Thank you for your help Thank in these important matters. .espectfully Yours . ‘4,. .-:„.'Zi("-itA7e, .,,€......e..--' '';r Marlin H. Hopfer•` .. 13 • Tax Lot 41.300 1S�'L 3CA � i ipl., ,L.,..Mg3:mdh .1 • ■ , f 11P44. '° • «' > * w.r, � * commissioner Barber moved and Commissioner Leverett seconded to approve S 89.06 and V 89-18 including all staff's condition except the requirement restricting parking. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present. 5.5 SII��.":ry6�+AD iJST1�.DL7EibVb��.L P ,..�T .••OREVIEWSSDR89-.07. VARIANCE V 89-15," LOT LINE 1 (ICR GERR°r'C /AY4 CORi .) A request for. 1) Site Development Review approval to allow a 290--unit multi-family residential development and associated improvements;'' 2) a Variance from the required additional setback of 50 feet from the centerline of Scholls Ferry Road. The requested additional setback is 45 feet from centerline; and 3) a Lot Line Adjustment between two parcels of approximately 2 acres and 14.28 acres into parcels of approximately acre and 14.59 acres. The balance of the area of these parcels, 0.69 acre dedicated to the State o proposed of Oregon as additional . s is ro raged to be dedic right--of-way for SW Scholls Ferry Road. ZONE: R_2,5 (Multiple-Family Residential, 25 units/acre). LOCATION: SW Scholls Ferry Road, • approximately 2000 feet south of its intersection with SW Old Scholls Ferry Road. (WCTM 151 33CD, tax lot 600 and 1S1 33CC, tax lot 200) Acting President Newton stated that he has a conflict and would not be voting on this item. Senior Planner Liden reviewed the proposal and made staff's recommendation for approval with 18 conditions. He reviewed objections raised by the neighborhood regarding the appropriateness of apartments and compatibility. Be stated that the neighborhood and applicant had agreed upon some conditions which the neighborhood would like included in the final ordeic. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION o Anthony Bonforte, XYZ Corporation, 10260 SW Greenberg Road, Tigard, introduced his professional staff who would be available to answer questions. He reviewed the site (using enlarged photographs) and the ° project noting how they intend to preserve the existing natural buffer. PUBLIC TESTIMONY o Russell Bead, NPO # 7 representative, stated that iwo # I supported staff's recommendation as submitted. o Evelyn Karle, Rt. 1 Box 382, Beaverton, 97007, commented that the trees belong to her- She is in favor of the proposal, howe ver, has concerns regarding ra f f xc, drainage at the end of her property and would like a fence constructet to protect her property. o Gail' Stover, Rt 1 Box 881, Beaverton, 97007, web concerned that the access onto Scholls Ferri y Road appeared and to be on a curve nd there might; be a avid Road;extension. She also wanted to know where the conflict with the D sewer would be locates. PLANNING CO1ISSIoN MIi UTEs � JUNE 5, 1989 - PAGE 5, • • I . _.. _x4_..,., ..,...-..N_...,k....+.............m..ti... :_....+.aw,......,._t ._..... ««+.,.+.....+µ,-»,a.!,..L,.«.,...r,........a.s.a'«.0 _ :M•�,\I.,.,..w]�i]. _j', ' N tl a.. 4 o Marl p , 390, Beaverton, 97007, favored the proposal, �. n Ho fer Ott 1 Box 39d Beaverton 97011 �. however, he would like to see uniformity with regard to setbacks. Also, that they be granted access to the sewer, storm drainage, and water. o Russell Head, 11689 SW Wilton, read a letter of opposition from Ron and , Anne Turner, 11787 SW Wilton. He agreed with their letter and added that there needed to be safeguards in the system when a developer down builds in an areas that his zoned for a higher density. Discussion followed regarding the Murray Blvd. extension. o Michael Steagmann, 11823 SW Wilton, concurred with the previous testimony. He COIYCt1 p by the Street of HP stated that the area had been misrepresented b city police this type y He Affordable Homes, and the c�.t needs to lids t of acta.v�.t H felt the apartments would be disruptive to the neighborhood. o ` Andy Priebe, (representing Paul Welt y) 139�� SW Cri st expressed his concerns for the storm water culvert and erosion that could occur to Pr. Welty's retaining wall. He questioned if the area is considered as a He wetlands area. He r - opaque/n0 gaps/double equegted that the fence be 'an walled fence. a Brenda Gilpin, 11721 SW Wilton, representing Cotswald Neighbtrhood, stated that the staff report did not adequately address concerns of the neighborhood. She also wanted it known that Mr. Edward Egging, who had submitted a letter in favor of the proposal, is not an abutting property owner. She stated that they do not Want any more apartments in their neighborhood and that she has collected 96 signatures supporting her letter that was submitted to the Planning Commission. She felt the City had misled property owners who had investigated how surrounding properties would develop. Paul 'Morris McKeever/Morris Inc. 812 SW Washington ? , OR " the Portland,o: P 05,, Landscape Architect representing the cotswald Neighborhood read his , , W Waghs.n on 5�.�110 Por J72 R letter with conditions that they would like added to the final order,. a REBUTTAL o Greg Hathaway, Attorney for the applicant, Garvey,, Schubert & Barer, addressed is the,,.le al criteria for a 2C}4, stated that the issue to be �.. 1211 SW I�fth Ave. Cortland 97 i g approval of the land use prpposal. S 2631? 21 Circt.mstancee regarding the purchasing of the single family lots would need to be set aside. The applicant has gone beyond what he needs to do to address the neighborhoods concerns: They have reviewed the condition presented' by Paul Morris and are willing to accept them. However, they are concerned as to who Mr: Morris represents, are the individuals p ' even i present, and will someone in the neighborhood appeal the decision ev f they accept the Condit ions o Wayne Kx.tt leson6_ Traffic Engineer, 412 SW Briadway, Portland, 97208, responded a p noes to issues raised in the letter 'from the � . C;it�. of Beaverton PLANNING COMMISSION ,'MINUTES - JUNE 6, 1989 - PAGE Ci P �. ti 0 Bob Poulton, OTAK,K 1 7355, 541 3oones Ferry Road, Lake Oswego, OR 97()x,5, -• stated that detailed plans for storm drainage and sewer are being worked '• out with City staff. o Tony Bonforte stated that the area is not a wetlands' as defined by the State.. He addressed concerns regarding uniform setbacks and buffering. o Paul Morris stated he represents the individuals who i signed Brenda • Gilpin's petition • o Russell Head explained that not everyonr on the petition is aware of the 1' new conditions. O Senior Planner Liden reviewed the letter x tram the City of Beaverton and conditions proposed by Paul Morris. ' o Commissioner Castile asked if there was anyone present who objected to the agreement being presented. No one objected. PUBLIC BEARING CLOSED pp the applicant has o gon y duty by accepting tin the conditions po gone beyond the call of duzl was for approval and that senses of the Comma.ssiQ y Y P g proposed by Mr. Morris approve Site Development Review aly� 89-07, Variance e V 89-150 Lot Line.4mmLSSZOne Roe borough moved Adjustment M 89-08, and Sensitive Lande SL 89-03 based on Staff's findings conditions submitted by MdKeever Inc.aozzditonr� and to include the co /Harris and dated June 6, 1989. Motion carried by atiajority of Commissioners present. Commissioner Newton abstained. 6. OTHER BUSINESS .,. r 7, ADjounNMENT '-. 11:45 PY9t ,///74,/,'`(..(.'," ,/(,./1://,/..."--,/ 1"i(.,(r,./'`'il'''''Z*e „_,.--,-' Secretary Diane a'r �ae M. Jel e s , AT1„ j : G eg..ry / 1' ton., Acting President •5/Pc- .,_ PLANNI G COMMISSION INU' S 6, 1 PA( 7 1 t . ,,- . ` 4' ' z ;: A h ii e ris P.C.P.C, .. p .. , I Jl '.1‘1 f ,4 1 .„ , „t' I„'1' r. Architecture•Civil Engineering•Development Services+Landscape Architecture•Lrind Punning•tJ,ban Design i,Surveying a , June 26, ,19$9' f Mr, Keith Liden i; . + . r I Y 0 F T I G At D P LAN 1H G DE PAR TME� .13125 SW' Hall. Blvd . P.O. Box 23397 i i . . Tigard, OR 97223 , : �.tE, W00DSIDE VILLAGE r Tigard, Oregon Project #2233 ' Dear Mr. 1 Liden: Per our discussions with the owner of Woodside Village and,Mt. Marlin H. Hopfer' (owner of Tax Lot 1300 1S133CA) , the developer of Woodside Village Apartments fig ' ' . agreed to provide the following improvements and easements in conjunction With \: development of the site as described below; 1. Public Sanitary Sewer service to the City of Tigard'. standards, to a depth ' ” that will adequately serve Tax Lot 1300. Y14. -: 2 Public Storm Drainage to the northeast co7.ner of Tax Lot 1300 with capacity to dtai:. the portion of the 1o.,., that cats: gravity drain to this corner (to 1 .,,. City of Tigard Standatds) , r 3 15' Private or Public Waterline Easement to the property` line of Tax Lot 2r '; 1300 (if acceptable to the Tigard Water District) ,• A.gr to 'by: Agreed ti by: . +� �" � An1hony G, Ed forte t Mr. arl�n H Hop�er /' , Villager Communities Owner of Tax Lot 1300 1S133CA y Sinderely, ^ OTAK, INCORPORATED 1 1 , Gregory T. Kurahashi, P.E. Principa1.. GTK:1,Inr\2233 .., , r>1W: ,, '1 L„14Yµ �, .'" kr '�* , µ . : g '"' f..ake OsW":gu,(Dragon 97935+(5031635-3616 Lake.CSsWa q�Ttice,M 17,3b5 S.W,C�Ut�raak[+errs+Road `, Vancouver Office: ' 101 East 8th 8traet w VariCouvet.Washington 98660 A(206)505.035? . Kirkland Office: `:,25 Cnntraf Way 4805+Kitktartd,Washington 95038 *(208))322.4448 T} .-.. _ «._.,.. .,-.».._ ... ................ e ......,..».� , .,.`4 a„ , .....,»_ .«....a..w..,._,.. .«1-„.,.x�..,._,... .........n,1....,vN.,l L.,.....,r..... .. ,,. ....»....._«w..,.,...+«: , \A' . y (.,,,_ /...., . 6 i'7 ‘,'' -/— i e/ -s—-S . 1 .....lt (//1). / y...1 ,. 14///1/6/1"17,,,i ,s°' p , ..,.., ./ (9-.1„t,t.,...-- .„, , , ,...., .,....-: „,,,,,, - , . . // / . .... ....... ) (,4.,•u.. , 771 0 ' s4.14y--/Ai.,,,t,,, .40. . . /-(A,e.,.....e............ , ,,... ,,... �,,,�° fir,,,ed /'' tw .1 . a 1 7. ... e„,,......6....” y • , �.. p //(per . . . . .. ,, z,,,,t,,, ,,t..,e,,,,...j..______, ,„,.,:-e._.,, ,e9,z.,,,L.,,,,_te,,,i,,,„t „. ..71,. ,4,,,,...,1==,,...,...... ' . ' ,. 6<,--'''':( -e--L,,,, , / *6--`(•,-- -- ,d(„14,__._._. . 000.'" ___,.t..,--1..A._e..1 ,---ti -'1,-, D 1 aor i / • t ,. , . . ,, d", . . , • / , , ,. i , . . . , , , , , . ,,„ ,.,?(, . . A i, . .., i -' - .-1 - N44‘t■‘ - - ' N \ 1,: k- -\7:b . --- -- -- - , - ---, ', .-- -_ :, - .. . _ :,_1",.1, , . .. ,,,z, _- _ -. _ ..,,, - s 1s, -4+. 'N'. - . . „1„, -,..),..„ _ , ., ‘ , -Nt . . - _` � �. .,__,. Ili . -‘,..,......\, \ \ ' 1`' ,- -.. - -i ---._._,, _ . Iltik- )\''4‘ ‘..- A. ° - .\.- \ , 114--i‘: .: .- . \- ,_, , - _, ..- , . . \ ' _Nk-',. . - ,'-'..N. __ -‘-k - ----- :-.. -: 1 .'..- --- - ' -1 \ .. -- \ %-.' \ \- * - \ . '. ' " - .-- . -, ' -- -- -- -- i - - - 1 I a . .- . itik ‘.. ' ‘. \_ .-‘ 'k-,. . e . - , - - - ----.-. -''. , .N,,, .'*'‘‘4#-NA- -' . - - _ '-', . ..-.;-- -__ _ - - -''.', .- '‘-. -*'' ,k . ' - ' '- .. N44, - - . ---- --'" -,- - -- '- ' ; - - i N - - - - ' .:- r -1 \ -\ - _ Ne--,,) N, .\ . --N. - -- _ --- r ,, .- . -- - -'-- --IFtti --: - - _ - - . I '-- - N- '4*, - -',.. ''' . .-- N. : '--- - --.---'\ '--.--. .-.--- '\-=. - - '' - 1---'' . N NN Iii.i . _ __-. - _ _\ _.\-,...1/4 - . \ _ - - -_, ---, ,_. - . - _ -_ - „._- ._. . _ _ _.,:. t E .,, ,_.. _ \ _ Ikt. - " Nk \. - - _ --- - - 4 't s '. - . -- - - .-. - ' - - - ---\ -'-- - i • ' "- -! 'lr‘ Ibt,.,4\.*'' '`\kt%, . . : - t\ \- " -. - - - - . . , . : : ... ... , , 1 _ %,\. \ \\ cl' N'*'''— `* - - --- ' j. -N - - - _ -," - ----- -=.--- . ' ,_ _ . _.,1 r h. � • �, r►f _ /;fri f ' ' ,rA� / 'k.,‘ 4 _-,t- e • :/ • . , ' . A' ../ . , . .`.... ',.. -, e ' • ill°9 ,,,t-, ' / ,;9,..,._, . - • , is pPr .A., , dr,/ ...,...e,„'.fr"-Itt-e,/,'Id4:.-----* t...-..- .. 4 L. - f , • .0#/i/ 0 , , ' : ; , . / ,�N✓✓rte �:�•/ (�/ " A / Y 1/ ce-, - ., Le e r ‘,.., ,,/...,,,t„,.i.,.. I . . "'. or ././ ... . , . .. . . , . tl>, ''" 1 fit. r , • . • r I .,,..: ..:,•.,• a • /.(* , ,,..,,o, 1 621., e;?!. .1'1'''' ' : : : I 4 //.14kw.)'''' 40'i' i • / r' ,, r I • .4,,,,,,'")•., t ) , .., . ■ - ��\� , , /4,.....,..,D....., .0 .. ® , • D . 71,,,,,,,11.../L6,..7 . , . ,' ,.M ,.//' / ' - j :i;'.:.4.' ,. .'' ' ' ,, ,, 'L'''./L'e/. i'L'. ' . , '' '' • ' ' ''' ' '. , I� ,,1, .' ,.. .1 . . . .......0.44,,,,,....."" eetl.........' „...1. Aele*.'C'e'e‘ .'.''''• ' ',..:: .. ' .''' . ,,. : ', ee,/lio,/t/L1 . ' ' , ' , ' , ' ' / - . ,.),,,e. ''.11,,"''C, AA.,,oe,. ... / i ,t .ry r M . . ', • el ,iks .) _ _ _ _. _,• _ -,_ . _ .=- -, .. ■k..\zz. --_-: 1 = _ _ - - __ - ,- -. - .r..„- '\ , -\- • ' , - - -. _IN4, 1 'IV , - - ...k -- _ - _: _ :, . __ _-____ _ - _ . . . ..\\,‘,, \.) 'i - - -., __ .• -.,, \-1 - % _ .. _, _-. k\,. ,- i„„_, , rN 7 :,_-_=,- _, - . --r, -. i ._: --7 - -., _.. :- 3 ` \- F\ 2 11 - - - 1 - - . ' '\ :'\ ' - . • - - .. . . !il- ._ . \_ - :--__- - _ . .-- --..- -_-',_- _'.'_ °%,\ i\-t NI _. _ ! .- - { \ _ . „„;., ,,_, _ _,. ,,. ,_ ..--.- 1 \ - 1 As . , . . , N \ . ---\ \ -- - ,1,4 - .. : - -\ . , _ . \ _ ' ,t,,,,,... , - \_. -..1t,4,,,, -; .-.\\I 4,- ,,,,,k, . --."\!,\,‘, .., ,,t1_ . . _ __ :.. ‘ ..'.\.- -'' - -. . ..' - ' } ..• , --: ._. _ t _ 1111 4 - - . ,_ . '',... ' , • - - \I - . , . - r \hi ..„,.\..._1- - , _ _ , ,..:..„,- , 4, - \ , _ . e.,,_, . . _ ._ . -,..,,,, iz..... ,•„A . •,) , . ,____ . \ _.,..va . ,_ 3 _ i.r: .. t w F r-j} Y. �4'« r fir► -- • ' •r y LJ i d ' 1 .-4,-.e_P.,_e., • rr ii •i . 1 ► • ..,.-'........:,,i✓,.w..-.F.,. -.w.-+:........_.ns:'.LL:r•h' .....•..:.:..a.G.+...+J.:..w:-+-«..wn.a ...,1,✓.,4.w-.-ii:-:.+..ti-,.1,..::M,a.+.....t.r.....-;.1..«.,,...A.-n�nr..a ..i.M-A.rw.«.,,r-sac-h«.......,eli.::...w.4,r. 1' a: STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 5.5 JUNE 6, 1989 - 7:30' PST ' TTG.PRD PtakNIAING 1 COMNl:I:SSION , TIGARD CITY HALL - TOWN HALL ,` 13125 SW HALL BLVD. • T7:GARD, OREGON 97223 U A. FACTS 1. General Information CASE: Site Development Review SDR 89-07, Variance V 89-15, Lot Line Adjustment M 89-08, Sensitive Lands SL 89-03. REQUEST: A request for: 1) Site Development Review approval to ' develop a 290 unit apartment complex "and associated , improvements; 2) Access Variance approval to ai.low the proposed development to be served, by two accesses • whe real the Community Development requires four , accesses for a development of this size; 3) Variance approval to a setback of 65 feet from the centerline of , the SW Scholls. Ferry Road whereas the Coannunity Development Code requires a 70 foot 'tietback; and 4) approval of a Lot Line Adjustment between two . parcels of approxitately 2 acres and .14. 28 acres into parcels' of approximately 1 acre and 14„59 acres. The , balance of the area of these_ parcels, 0.69 acres, is proposed to be dedicated to the State of Oregon as , additional right-of-way o for,SW New V S oho s F erry Road; ) Sensitive approval for modif icatio n ,1 of an open .. drainageway through re laciri g it with storm sewers. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: M e d D e n s i t y ,Reaiidential ZOOMING DESIGNATION: R 25 (Mal unz.ts/ 25 acre) i e Fame Resi antis APPLICANT: XYZ Corporation OWNERS: Donald Poilock.' Ton k3onfo7.te 10211 SW Barber Blvd. (Tony ) 10260 SW Greenberg RO:,ad S-202 Tigard, OR 97223 Portland, OR 97211 Mart.1ery f' Crist Route 1, Box 972 , Beaverton, OR 97007 LOCATION: East aide of SW Scholls Ferry Road, approximately 2,000 feet south of its intersect i;on with SW ;Old Schoil.s Ferry Road (WCITtil 121 3300, tart lot 200:and:151 I'; 3SCb, tax lot 600) • fi STAFF DEPORT --, SDR,89-07 - ;XXZ, Corporation - page 1 . b y , Q •r N 2. Background Information • In May, 1987 a subdivision (S 87-03) proposal to divide the • subject property into ' 2 ., lots was approved by the Hearings officer. In July, 1985, the Bearings officer approved an extension of the approval subject to conditions, This decision ' . as appealed to the- City y Council by both the applicant and ., surrounding neighbors but was later withdrawn by the applicant. Vicinity Information Except to the south, the parcel is surrounded by property that is zoned R-25 (Residential, 25 units/acre). single family residential development is located to the east in three phases of o Cotswald subdivision The proposed Murray Blvd. extension and an approximately five acre undevelo p ed area zoned C-N (commercial Neighborhood) are located to the south. A small acreage parcel to the north is .occupied by one single family residence. The Sunflower .apartment complex abuts the property to the northeast. 4. Site 'Information and pro P oral bescriptn io , The .proposed' apartment complex site conristo of two tax lots. g ' Tax lot 500 contains approximately 2 acres and contains a single family residence and detached garage. Tax lot 200 is approximately 14.28 acres in size, undeveloped, is mostly open field on the west and north, and � is tree covered on the eastern . portion propertY. A drainage containing a small intermittent creek runs from south to north across the property. • The applicant proposes to develop a 290 unit apartment development including 15 residenti al buildings and a ` r . building. The proposed unit count includes e o two bedroom • ,.",:`: 2'1�rm�on community/recreation :hui units and 14 three bedroom units. A swimming pool, a sports court, a tot lot with play structures, and a volleyball court are proposed as recreational facilities ' serving the projects residents. (NOTE: The pond and northern ' y g pool the y 17, most exercise cozXUnuxsa.t building and 00,1 shown. on t May 17 1959 site plan are to be eliminated according to the applicant on 5/30/89)- The site plan provides for 515 parking spaces to be located along, a network of internal roadways. Thirteen garage buildings would include 100 parking spaces; carports would provide another 190 parking spaces. Sixteen designated handicapped spaces would be provided` The dsvelopde t s proposed aed to served by two 26 foot wide entrances from SW Sc o1 g pe rry Road which ch is an arterial road under the State Highway Division's j A Variance .• ' Division's ua.�.sdiction. '�arx pis requS ated to community Develapment Code Sectio n 1t ,10u.0/0(b) which requires that multiple family residential developments of between 200 and 300 dwelling units by four served ki'° at least. fro accesses. An emerg enc access to the to posed�.tts be serve .. p p ed de'velopmcrit from S . g earlier plan submitted a W morning Hill Drive that was shown on an STAVE' Rt 0gT - Sn8 59-07 4.- xYz Corporation - Page 2 , tl : ar "Nor. for th a application has been eliminated from the site plan now under review. The site Plan notes that 14 feet of additional right-of-way along P g the entire SW Scholls; Ferry Road frontage will be dedicated to plan and .• . the State of Oregon. The lan also notes that a new curb g frontage. The sidewalk will be constructed along the site's iront applicant's traffic stady recommends that a left turn refuge be provided for the main entrance to the proposed development, but a left 'turn lane is not indicated on the site plan. The proposed development would be served by a City of Beaverton sanitary sewer trunk line in SW Scholia Ferry Road. The public sewer line will be extended through the site to serve parcels to ,. ' the south. Water service would be provided by the Tigard!Water District. The site is located within the Beaverton School District. . Storm drainage would be collected by a network of storm sewers ' throughout the site connected to existing• public storm sewers in SW Ashbury Lane and SW morning Dill Drive. The proposed storm extension be s . � extension would b� connected to a culvert under SW Scholl • sewer, . Ferry Road which drain s to open drainage ditches. Because the storm sewer system would• replace a network of open drainage ditches, Sensitive',Lands approval is requested. pp requested a Variance to the required front '' The a 1a.cant has also re est r� �. , ; � yard along SW A front Yard setback of 65 from the •r J feet road's centerline. y feet from and setback orlon S�7 Scholls Fe Road of 70 fe rr RQa . ',• • centerline requested garages Po t qu westBide A 0 foot setback from the property line is required • in the R-25 .. . zone. Community Code Section 18.9E.0 20( ) ( ) requires that an additional 50 feet from SW Scholls Ferr y Roa d's centerline b e ad ded to the zones Setback re q uirem ent. , • x In addition, the applicant requests Lot Line Adjustment approval to adjust the northern lot line between tax'. lots 200 and 600 ' , '. resulting in parcels of approximately 14059 acres and 1 acre respectively, compared to the lots' resent sizes of 14.28 and 2 acres The balance of the original parcels are to be dedicated to the State of Oregon as right-of-way for SW `Scholls Ferry '' Road. Tax lot 600 is to be retained for prospective future use of the site for a day care center. The present application does not include a request PP y care Center on the e ,• site. Children's " " - dren r r� day care is a conditional use in the A-25 zone for a royal of a day and must be reviewed ewed by the City's k o a rin s Officer thy ough a separate application and hearing Process. ry�r y Aaenc and NpO Comment 5� The nng" "ng Division has reviewed the proposal and offers the • a.neerL following comments • STAF'F' REpQRT SDR 89-07 JtYL Corporation -- gage 3 •r • • .,: ..,. , A A.AAA a. The site is located along the east side of SW Scholls Ferry Road, west of SW Wilton: Street and_, north of the proposed extension of SW Murray Boulevard. SW Scholls merry Road is . an arterial under the jurisdiction of the Oregon State Highway Division. Acceee to the site is proposed from two driveways to SW Scholia Ferry Road,. The Community ' Development Code requires four accesses;` however, the submitted traffic plan and City staff have concluded that two driveways are adequate so long as an exclusive left turn pocket is provided on SW Scholia Ferry Road at the main site access driveway. b. Storm drainage • ge would• be provided by extending the public • line in SW. As hbury Lane, through the site to a culvert under SW scholia Ferry Road. The existing 24" culvert is of inadequate capacity and should be replaced by a culvert of adequate capacity as required by the Oregon State Highway Division. •, .. co Sanit ar y sewer service would be provided from a City of ,,:• Beaverton trunk line in SW Scholls Ferry Road. The public line is extended through the site to serve parcels to the south that cannot be served by the line in SW Wilton Street. need g The eed for extending the sanitary sewer along SW scholia Ferry Road has not been determined.Building Division has commented that a olition permit miUst ' •1 be obtained before demolishing or moving the existing garage and house located on tax lot 600 The Oregon State Highway Division has reviewed the proposal and has provided the following comments: „ a. An Oregon State Highway Division access permit' is required. b. An additional 14 feet of right--of-way for SW Scholia Ferry Road is required._ as shown on the plan. A five foot wide sidewalk and curb shall `be constructed as shown. "' cW A left ett :urn lane into the main (southernmost) entrance • is required. The Tigard Water District has reviewed the proposal and requests op - er �.orxtact the District With additional . that the developer information on the proposed water service plan. The Water • District reports that there Will be no capacity problem With serviri a development of this size g p . • h . , •, The Deaverton School. District has commended that the proposed ., development would be expected to add approximately 41 students to a the District's schools. The District totes that the ;students Can a be served by existing schools Without eltceeding the schools' capacities. however, the District notes that if continued rapid growth the tinues, options for housing resideni-ial. rowth in thF District con , STAFF REPORT' SD;f 89-07 -4: XY2 dorporation - Page 4 e ; 6 • additional students such as portable classrooms or double ' `' shifting students may be necessary until additional classrooms are constructed. Neighborhood. Planning Organization from ' . several neighbors of the site as the NPO's comments letter tth. Plannin Or anizata.on #7 endorsed a �.et ' on the . proposal. The April 19, 1989, letter signed by Brenda Gilpin is ' not summarized in this section, but is attached to the staff ". pa one. The applicant's' ;•. report as attachment om pp icant's May 19, 1989, letter to Keith Liden (attachment two) responds to the letter from N . . Gilpin. A comment letter has also been re ceived from Edward Egging, an abutting property owner, (Attachment Three)h roe) stating that: 1) the Previously mentioned letter from nei g hbors of the site does not represent the views of all of the site's neighbors; 2) not all neighbors oppose the proposed development; and 3) the writer does not feel that development of the proposed apartment project would be detrimental to single family home values in the neighborhood. No other comments have been received. B. ANALYSIS 1. Site Development Review ro osal for development mnt of a 290 Y, complex conforms with unit apartment � •. ' P proposal p p ` -h Community Development Code R-25 zoning district •. requirements (Code Section 18.56) for type of use and permitted • density (opportunity for. 343 multi-family dwelling units based on applicant's density calculations according to Code Chapter 18.92; 290 • dwelling units proposed), minimum setbacks from property boundaries (except the additional front yard setback requirement discussed under; Variances, below), building heights (45 feet permitted; maximum height , of 40 feet propgeed), Site coverage (80 percent maximum site coverage allowed-• 1 percent s coverage proposed), and landscaped, area (20 percent site landscaping required; greater than 40 p p g p p J, ercent site landaca ro The proposal. complies a.n with Site Deed De.velopment Review approval standards (Code Section 15.120.180) for privacy, private outdoor areas (decks and balconies), shared recreation. space (sports court, swimming pool, tot lot; community building), site lighting, provisions for emergency vehicle access and maneuverability, and design offsets acorn building I nd maneuve y design g `ldarag ` ' faces. Dwelling units and recreational facilities have been located �' ,'; to the interior of the site so as to reduce noise impacts on neighboring properties and increase visual privacy between adjacent '' uses. In addition, fencing and vegetative buffering along with -. differences in elevation between this site and adjacent properties also 'Will add to privacy between the proposed development and its neighbors. Staff also finds that reasonable care has been taken to locate buildings and site improvements so as to minimize the number of existing trees that will be removed. A tree protection plan should be required as a condition of approval of the proposal to assure protection of these trees during construction activity an the site. SAVE' ADPORT - SDR 89-07 - Z corporation. - Page 5 • I h The proposal also complies with Code standards for total parking ' spaces (435 parking spaces required; 515 spaces provided), covered parking (290 covered spaces required; 290 provided), designated } .••:. handicapped parking (11 han'I capped spaces required; 16 provided),sded), n7 xax um compact o total parking space ratio (1:4 maximum; , Proposed). The internal roadways exceed the minimum driveway width. standard (24 feet minimum width required, 25 feet minimum width , proposed) and provide for adequate emergency vehicle maneuverability and a non-confusing access pattern (no dead ends). r'• proposed improvements to the SW Scholls Ferry Road frontage of the site will provide improved pedestrian and vehicle safety and will ' comply with State of Oregon Highway Division roadway improvement standards. A left turn refuge should be required to be constructed as a condition of approval of the applicant's traffic 0. pP proposal. The a study has adequately demonstrated that the levels of service of nearby , st.4,-?a is that would be affected by anticipated traffic from the proposed development would not be significantly impacted by the proposed development in addition, the traffic study points out that several transportation improvements such as the Murray Boulevard extension, realignment and improvement of both Scholls Ferry and Old , Scholia Ferry Roads, and possibly construction of the proposed Western By-Pass are presently under consideration. These ro osed road P p . . .improvement projects are intended to improve traffic circulation in this area. The proposed development should therefore not be expected to result in undue traffic problems. ' As previously mentioned, a _substantial portion of the site will be landscaped - far in excess of the minimum Bite area landscaping , . required in the R-25 zone. In addition the landscaping plan satisfies Code Section 18.100 requirements for street trees, parking lot screening along SW Scholls Ferry Road, parking area treee, r. screening of service facilities, and minimum buffering and screening requirements except as noted below. A sic foot tall wooden site obscuring fence hale been added along the parcea.'s boundaries with the. Cotswald Meadows subdivision in order to red oe noise and increase privacy between neighbors.. A minimum buffer width of 5 feet has been provided on all bordersof the site except along the site's SW Scholls Perry Road frontage. Although the buffer width is appropriate, insufficient detail is provi ded regarding the types and sizes of . .,. buffer materials. 18.100.080 specifies plant � . . Code Section 15.1x. 480 speczf�.es minimum sizes fo:c required buffer areas. The landscape plan should be revised to provide additional detail on buffer area materials and Size. In Y fencing addition, the site plan does not indicate �.n� fenc�.n around the swimming pool area.Y + .' ,� g p Code Section 18.100.140(C) requires that ';'• swimming pools be enclosed by a Minimum four foot tall `fence with a Self latching gate. The revised site plan should also Cotply with • this requirement • .' In response to neighborhood concerns, the applicant has increased the setback from abutting the rear yards of homes fronting Ashbury Lane to 15 feet instead of the 10 foot Setback requited by the Code. Four Carport structures are proposed in this area p p The applirant, has also indicated in the May 19, 19890 letter to Keith Llden an intent to ;• elim n- " ty o th e previously p ro osed emergency vehicle access to Morning �I #ill Drive and to replace the LombardY po p lars alon g the site's STAFF REPORT * SDR 89.0' - XyZ Corporation page 6 I • • �� ' fir 4 , } " ....-...wn ..vf,..n 1..... x,....r....,.n - .._... .......»,J.., ,. .,.u».. a.._ .i..n ♦w ...a....,_ r w..-. 4_... I . n "..,.ri _ _... n..,♦ w,i... x.-._L.1..... .r.h 1Mw o..+........}✓.....ei1. }.r.w. .l..na.-:..".+.t • + `' t u * 0 eastern boundary with the Cotswald subdivision with Douglas Fir or Canadian Hem lock depending on their availability. The landscaping plan should be revised to show these changes. 2. Variances 'I Two 'V'ariances to Community Development Code standards have been ,requested as part of the Site Development Review application. Code Section 18.108.070(b) requires that multiple family res7rlential. p containing between 200 and .300 dwelling units b, alerved '.. developments , by four accesses. The applicant requests that the proposed Code Section 18.95-0'20(13) (1) requires es from SW Scholls Ferry load. by two acces development served a setback: of 50 feet from the Y be ser centerline of SW Scholia Ferry Road in addition to the applicable . front setback specified by the zoning district. A 20 foo t ront yard :: ' setback is required in the R-25 zone. The applicant requests that a 65 foot total setback from the road's centerline be permitted rather than 70 feet as would normally be required by the s" de. Access Variance for the Commis • Code Section 18.108. Commission to allow a �r ' .. 250 provides variance to access reguireme,ts if it is found that: ll. It is not passible to share access; r, 2. There are not other alternative access points on the 'street in question or from another. street 3. The access separation requirements cannot be met; 4: The request is the minimum variance required to provide adequate , access; ,;;« ` 5. The approved access or access approved with conditions will ., result in a safe access; and 6. The visual clearance requirements of Chapter 18.102 will be met.. ' 1 Sn the present situation, the Variance is requested in order+ to reduce 1 , p g east through not g �• g providing road [„ s impacts on the nei h�sorhoos3 to .the. ea connections between the proposed de relopment and SW Ashburn Lane and ,.; SW Morninghill Drive in the Cotswald Meadows subdivision. The stubs of these streets on the eastern edge of the 'subject site would be the logical Pointe for additional , ,g p �, accesses allow�vthen opportunity a d connection g with these streets,, however, would for a l g _ from the proposed development through a nee. hborhond of single f s�. n3:fa.Cant� amount t of traffic, `g i g family residences and vise versa.: The City i, generally tries to avoid such a traffic pattern, although this is not ' ' specifically stated by Plan policies or Community Development Code standards. ,. In the present situation, no other alternative access points are - available: At this timer there are no feasible options for sharing Y access with adjacent proper•cies. The site's frontage is not long enough to allow for development of three accesses and comply With the •, ,= STAFF -REPORT SDR 89-07 . XYZ Corporation:; - Page 17 v 1 / . s Y 1. i 4 I is 350 foot access spacing standard applicable to a state highway. The State Highway Division, Tigard Engineering Division and Fire • District No. 1 have not commented that the proposed access plan for the development would be detrimental to traffic safety purposes. The . • `` applicant's traffic report has '.concluded that the two access drives proposed can adequately accommodate all daily and peak hour site- ge nerated traffic while still maintaining acceptable levels of traffic , operation and safety. The width of the accesses proposed are larger ' than the minimum width required thereby somewhat offsetting the need for add nal drivewa s by allowing easier Passage��. itio y y P age through these points. The proposed site improvements at the access driveways are designed to comply with the vision clearance requirements of the Code. Because of the above seasons and in order to eliminate traffic impacts of the proposed developments on the neighborhood to the east, staff . recommends approval of the requested access variance. Variance -- Front Yard Setback As mentioned previously, Subsection 18.96.020 of the Community p requires additional setback of 50 `feet from the Development Code re a.res� an �dditiona ,� � to , thetp�Oline of S 4a Scholls Ferry Road. Thi,� set back is in addition t foot setback required by the R-25 zoning district. The resultant 70 foot setback from the centerline of Scholls Ferry goad is b v M 5 feet greater than the 65 feet proposed. The setback from the front property proposed 'to be 20 feet which is the `normal setback n� .. a.s for 'the R-25 Zoning 'district. • The 5O. foot additional setback is required by Tigard Municipal code subsedtion 18.96.020 because SW Scholia Ferry Road is classified as an arterial street by the City's Transportation Plan Map and was until Y by " County P the five recentl b the Washington yunt Trapn� ortation Plan Of by ion Plan Ma as arterials, the Code requires that only SW Schoiis Ferry streets classified b the City's Transportation i � y Road and Pacific Hi.ghwtel.y have a 50 foot additional- centerline setback required whereas Hail Boulevard r Upper Boonee Perry Road and Durha1 Road have 'a 45 fOot .r additional centerline setback required Recent revisions to the Washington County Transportation Plan have downgraded SW Schol1s Ferry Road to a major col wX n collector ci,assifit,�ttio . pg g Scholia Ferry Road to an arterial classification. while a raclin old 'SGh� ; Code Section 18:134:05'0 folloWing rovides the approval criteria, for p �! Variances to non-access related Code standards These criteria apply to the_request scholia for the reduced additional setback from 5G� � Ferry Roads (1) The proposed variancr� will not... be licte�withythe olici:eg of the materially detrimental to t Comprehensive her a l p the to e ari ot< icable Policies and Purposes of this Code p ire Plans y pP � P standards and to other properties in the sate zoning district or vicinity: (2) There are special circumstances that exist Which are peculiar to . I the lot Size or sh ape e topogr .aphy or other circumstances over • which the properties in the same zoning; district, STAFF REPORT' SDR 89--07 - XYYI,S Corporation N- Page 8 • - .r.r.r....,::.....w. .:..r. ,..r...:, .. -:, :... _ -.:« ..»., r.+...:.x r.rr...:...: as ..`l. ....J,.. (3) The use proposed will be the same' as permitted under this Code • and City Estandards will be maintained to the greatest extent that • y possible, some,. . permitted e economic use of "•' is reasonably ss�-ble, while rmi ted land. 4, Existing and natural� ) g physical systems, such as, but not limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic land forms or 'parks will not be adversely affected s;iy more than would occur if the development were located as specified in the Code; and ,1 (5) The hardship is not solf-imposed and the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. The general purpose of the required additional setback from the centerline permit or afford better, light, air, and vision . �exline- is to ermit ,o clearance on more heavily traveled streets, and to make the location of structures compatible with the need for the eventual widening of streets. The reduction in the required additional setback from 50 • feet to 45 feet will not negatively affect the amount of air or light available to the property or adversely affect vision clearance from the entrance drive to or from Scholls Ferry Road. Widening of Scholia Ferry Road is being provided et f or by the proposed sed developmen t . and the dedication required b y the State Highway Department feet from centerline wi ll be made. No additionalwideningis anticiga ed. The applicant has pointed out that the circumstanced over which the property's owners have no control that affects this property, as well parcels frontin that the City as Cher `ng oat SW Scholia Ferry S�',oad, are of Tigard's Transportation Pagan Z4ap and Community Development Code have not yet been revised to be consistent with Washington county's redesignation of the road to a major collector functional classification. the City's Transportation reflect Plan Map and Code would have already beenrf revised to this r designation, a lesser set back requirement would typLcally be required and the present site . . plan would comply with Tha. requirement without thatt a variance. qu variance uses allowed on Allowance of the requested va ri e would not affect us th e property nor will compliance with Cod orPlan standards be affected. Staff does not foresee any impact upon physical or natural systems if the variance is allowed to any greater extent than would occur if the development proposed located in compliance with meat ro osed c�aas to be �Loca the, required setback: Finally, as the applicant has pointed out, the hardship results from an inconsistency between the City',s Plan and code with revised plans . y the hardship• ` not for the future use of the road. In this way is self-imposed. The amount of variance requested, five feety ',is minimal and the setback proposed by the site plan Would exceed the setback that would likely be required if the Codeus setback requirement was based upon SW Scholls Ferry goad being a Major� collector street. Ferry 5 of upon s that the criteria for . variance have been i eat staff, tnerefore finds Satisfied for this regii� and we recommend approval of the requested reduced front yard setback. STAFF REPORT SDR B9-0`7 X Z Corporation * Page 9 r , .,.r..n,r.,,r. :n. .,r: .. rr,,rr. ;: ,.,r.rm:. .rur,..:: r.. r : ,..r._r,� rrr,..:r .r. :. ,... . . ..., ...._ ,.. •.... . .r. .,.,r ..,:r. ....,. ...r..,.r r., r.... ,., ,..,_ _.. ,r, . rm. :..r... ..,,.r r,r n.,.N„. .. • 3. :Lot Line Adjustment The proposed lot line adjustment between tax lot 600 (2 acres) and tax lot 200 (14.28) acres will result in lots of approximately 1 acre and . 14.59 acres. The balance of the area of these parcels, 0e69 acr es, is proposed to be dedicated to the State of; Oregon for additional right-= of-way for SW. Scholls Ferry Road. The proposed adjustment complies with Code Section 18.162.060 approval standards for a lot line adaustment4 no additional lot is being created; neither parcel is being reduced below the minimum lot size for the R-25' zoning district; and no structure on either lot will be in violation of applicable 1 setback standards provided that the existing structures on tax lot 600 . are removed prior prior to recording the lot line adjustment. Therefore, all applicable criteria for a lot line adjustment ` are met. Staff recommends approval of the proposed adjustment. 4. Sensitive Lands , In order to approve a proposal that involves modification of an existing drainageway,geway, the following Section lowin criteria contained an 18.84.040(0)` mtist be fieda i;. 1. The extent and nature of the proposed land form alteration or development will not create site disturbances to the extent greater than that required for the use; prop p t development t will not resin.. or 2• in erosion, stream sedimentation, ground , instability or othe r adverse on-site and off-site effects or hazards to life or property 3. The water flow capacity of the drainageway is not decreased; and 4, Where natural vegetation has been removed die to land form alteration of the development, the areas not covered by structures or impervious surfaces will be replanted to Prevent erosion in accordance with Section 18.100, Landscaping and Screening. 5. The` drainageway will be replaced by a public facility of adequate size to accommodate maximum flow in accordance with the adopted 1981 Master Drainage Plan. -, 6. The necessary '0.S. Army corps of Engineers. and State of Oregon Land Board, Division of State Lands approvals shall he obtained. . '• Where land form alterations and/or development are allowed within and adjacent to the 100-Year floodplain, the City Shall require the dedication of sufficient open land' area within and adjacent to the floodplain in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. This area shall include portions of a suitable elevation for the co. .. ,an/bic Cle pathway within -the flood lain in accordance with nstrizction of a pedestri y o tep Y p d Pedestrian bicycle p the ad pathway plan, ((Ord. 89.06; Ord. 87--66, Ord. 87` 82, Ord: 86--081 Ord. 84-29; Ord;. 8.3-52) STA'FF' R.FPORT - SDR 89-»07 - XYZ Cor orat3.ori Page 10 P g � • 0 • The applicant proposes replace drainage ditches Th oses to re lace a network of d presently on the site with a network of public and private storm sewers. The sewer network would con . y g convey storm drainage e to the west under Scholia Ferry' Road through a 24 inch diameter culvert to an open drainage ditch. The storm sewer network would connect to existing 12 � g inch storm sewers draining to the site from Moacninghill, Drive and from the eastern edge of the site abutting the Sunflower apartments The storm sewer plan does not show a connection with the existing storm sewer from SW Ashbury Lane. All of these existing storm sewers presently daylight to the subject property. Details are not provided on the size of storm sewers proposed to be instaa,led. Staff Linda that the proposal to replace the existing drainage ditches • with storm sewers is largely consistent with the applicable Sensitive Lands approval criteriap except that additional details must be provided regarding the capacities of the proposed storm sewers and additional provisions may need to be made to collect drainage onto the subject site from surrounding properties. Installation of the storm is ped to create site disturbances ' beyond that which is which to install the sewers. Replacing the open drainage ditches should serve to reduce the `potential for erosion necessary erosion, stream sedimentation, and ground instability on-site and the storm drainage plan is not anticipated to adversely impact downstream open { drainage ditches. The site and landscaping plans propose to re- vegetate all by installation except. • g 11 areas disturbed b the storm sewer l.nst:alla where structures or paved areas are proposed. The area is not identified as being within a 100 year floodplain by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Fenno Creek - Summer Creek, July 1980 Flood ce S Sheet 81). e � identified fied as a wetland b y the Comprehensive Plan's wetlands and dra inageways map- The area, therefore is not subject to state and federal wetlands and floodplain regulations. Staff, therefore, concludes that the proposal to replace the existing drainage ditches with storm sewers is ; I. ` tent with the applicable Sensitive Lands criteria consistent i the � ateria exs:cept with. regard to details on the capacity of the on site Story l sewers and the culvert under Scholia In addition, it must be olZs Ferry Road. demonstrated that the proposed storm drainage a e adequately pick up storm drainage to pthe site from other properties. City policy with Sensitive Lands applications iet to defer the provision of such Division's the detailed review of proposed ' details until Engineering Di.vis public improvements. Stafl`, therefore, recommends Sensitive Lands 'I approval of the conceptual plan to install storm sewers to replace the open di y conditions ingneerin,g Dvibion detai1 edreviewof�the�ca capacity proposed d stem. • 5. Neighborhood Concerns vik The April 19, 1989 letter, from Brenda Gilpin to Yeith Liden (Attachment #1) raises numerous issues related to the present E application, The letter has been endorsed as the commentS of NPO' *7 I}} p � immediate 1 neighbors of the represents the develo ents of several of the and apparently Donforte i P pp Tony i � n a May !zt r '� " Y ment site. The a lica T � nth Liden Attachment 2 1.9 r 1989 letter to dCe , addresses each of the neighbors' concerns g .. and notes than,..es in the site plan that were made to, accoi odate CoMe of the ;neighbors' I requests. Virst, th e side yard abutting residences on Ashbury Street. t` • S�.A FB RLFORT SDR 89-C 7 - XI1 Corporation - Pa e 11 u , a ' ^ has been increased to 15 feet rather than the 10 feet required by the Code. The neighbors had requested a minimum 20 foot side yard. second, a six 'foot high wooden site-obscuring fence has been proposed on the site's border with neighboring single-family homes within Cotewald Meadows subdivision. In addition, although not noted in the xYZ letter, the Fire District has indicated that an emergency access from SW Morning hill Drive to the development was not necessary. The • revised site plan has therefore eliminated the emergency access so that there ere are now no pedestrian passageways between the proposed development and the Cotswald neighborhood. Several other neighborhood concerns remain that are addressed below. Foremost in the neighbors, concerns appears to be their frustration with additional multi-family unite being proposed in their neighborhood, especially because many of the neighbors believed that j e developed with single family homes because . the subject site would b of earlier plans for the property. Without belaboring the. point, d staff again points g been zone.,.. a�.n a.nte out that this entire ne;�. hborhood had ' R-25 (Multiple-family Residential) for some time prior to development of the Cotswald subdivisions. This zoning designation provides the opportunity f or a variety of residential housing types, but the zone is Primarily intended for apartments. Unapproved plans and even preliminary subdivision plat approval do not guarantee that a parcel • will develop es proposed. While staff sympathizes with the Cotswald neighbors if they misunderstood the Potential uses of neighboring ' . properties, staff ,. a lso recognizes the rights of adjacent acent pr opert y owners to de velo p their properties within he established constraints and opportunities of the Comprehensive Plan and Community Development . code and in response to changing demands for housing. In P response to the s pecific requests raised by the neighbors' letter, P staff offers the following comments. Our comments are largely the Same as the applicant's in his May 19 letter for no Other reason than • tha•that we believe the applicant correctly understands the development process in Tigard and the constraints involved in designing a development that works well not only for the neighbors of the development but also for the future residents of the development and the needs of the larger community. 1. Right-of-way dedication requirements are established by the . with regard to sound; engineering Oregon State Highway Division ta design possible g Y approval bodies n forts oss�.ble future road vi�.den�n G .t a royal are not free to modify this pre-established requirement. 2. An increased set has been provided vieed site plan. The Betba k provided exceeds the City's re q�ired side yard setback in the R-25 zone. Possible a Lot 600 as a day care facility is 3. The os�a,ble future:_use of ' p a ro osal for such � time. A separate Conditional use review of not an a.d�sue at thi- a use id required. F Relocating parking facilities from the eastern side of the proposed multi-family development to Tax Lot 600 would be insensitive to the needs of future is of the site and future reoiden certainly would tend to exclucle elderly and handicapped persons . " STAFF RFPO T - SnR 89-07 - CyZ corporation - page 12 ' , from the proposed development, especially on the east side of the development. ' 4. The site plan fies Code requirements for covered parking spaces ' . • and evenly distributes the covered spaces' throughout the }`' development in consideration of the needs of future residents. ' qu g covered parking• p rking to' one side of the Requiring relocation of the cov site would be insensitive to the future residents' needs, as described above. Requiring additional covered spaces beyond what is required by the Code would be economically unreasonable to the ' developer and would open the City to charges that it had exceeded f the clear and objective housing standards required by State law requirement that sp conditions approval should and the re ecial conditions for a royal not have the effect of discouraging needed housing through unr easonable cos t or delay (ORS 197.307(5)). The proposed driveways and site lighting are located to the inside of the development and are at a lower elevation than the residences along Wilton Avenues Reas onable attention has been taken by the site designer to locate these facilities'Ito as to reduce impacts upon the neighbors to the east 5 & 6. The residential buildings on the eastern portion of the site • would e se from the p p y line a significant distance Landscaping and garages would be located in t he 1 • intervening area. This should provide an adequate separation of thee buildings from the Site's boundaries so that relocation of the buildings or replacement of the proposed building types with a lower height building is not warranted. In addition, it appears reasonable to allow the development to locate its larger Fp ears � greater e develo Ferry buildings at a reater distance from SW Scholls per Road to take advantage of the quieter environment away from the road. 7. Recreation facilities are most logically located in the center of a development to serve the needs and convenience of the residents. 8, 11 & 12. The Planning Commission is not free to place regulations on these activities beyond what is required by other City regulations. 9. The applicant has revised the landscaping plan to provide Douglas • Fir Cr Canadian Hemlock within this area as requested. 10. Staff recommends to the Commission that the applicant be required additional buffering materials to be used and for heastaff Gto review thle additional information to assure compliance with Code requirements. Staff finds that the p . additional bufferin g materials ls suggested by the neighbors appear r excessive With •, neighboring regar d ard to the ne ed for buffering betwee the developments and would, therefore, Create an unreasonable financial burden on the developer of the apartments. In addition, it should be noted that the 5 foot wide buffer requirement of the R-,25 tone is intended',to occur on both sides of a property line so as to result in a minimum 10 foot wide buffer between .adjaoent developments. City policy is not to require the installation of buffering materials by the developer STAFF RLPOR`r - SDR 89-07 - XYZ corporation -- Page 13 Y ' I _ r ' of a single family residential subdivision but instead to defer, '•f this requirement until the lots are developed. This is done so that the buffering may be done to the individual property owners' taste. Buffer materials are generally absent on the Cotswald side of - the site's boundary. If property owners on both sides of the boundary ll endeavor to sa y their • buffering requirement, the in t n tf the buffering standard will be met and the additional buffering requested by the neighbors of the proposed development should not be necessary. 13. The request to require that the telephone number of the proposed! apartment developments manager be provided to certain neighborhood residents is not something that the City would be 'reasonably le 'to enforce and therefore should not be required qua,red as a condition of approval of the proposed development.. 14. Requiring off-site . kmprovemente to private residences is far , beyond the powers of the City in .the review of a development proposal. . 15 The City does not require architectural review Of proposed } buildings through the Site Development Review process. u , 16. Construction activities, such as are addressed by Ms. Gilpin's letter, are regulated by the City's Municipal Code, although not to the extent requested. Staff does not feel that the Planning Commission should restrict activities such as music playing or hours of construction activity on one side of the boundary' between the proposed'; development site and Cotswald Meadows if y those activities are not similarly restricted on the other side. Staff does, however, agree that construction traffic and construction parking within should be the Cotswold Meadows prohibited except as necessary to construct a security fence j prior to commencing other construction on the site. The applicant has agreed to such a restriction. C. FINDINGS AND CONCL`iSIONu- The applicable criteria in this care are Tigard Comprehensive Plan policies 2:1.1, 3.4.2, 6,6.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 8.1.1 and 8.1.3 and y p P , , Community Development Code Cha tars 18.56 .L8.840 18.96, 18.100, 18.1020 18.106, 18.1080 18.110, 18.120, 18.150, and 18«164. The Planning staff concludes that the T g `, proposal with modifications is consistent with the applicable portions of the Comprehensive Plan based upon the findings noted below. a. Policy 2.1.1 is fled because Neighborhood Planning Organization 7 and surrounding property owners were given notice of the hearing an opportunity to comment on the applicant's proposal. and b. Polic ' 3 4.2 calls for the protection of vegetation and natural.; y P g drainage courses: The drainageway only carries water seasonally and no special protection is prescribed in the gull Mountain;' dommunity Plan.' � Treed on the site should be Protected to the STAFF REPORT - SDR 89,-07 - XYz Corporation Page 14 1 . O' I ,-.., _ ,.� „ •_.. ,e ... .. w .L.,. x-1,::lus4.+ ,.4« wWM..x, .. .il.,« nMA.J,x. :�i.»w, 4�..d..a..Jl..-..... �l':--.V..w..,,i..-,... maximum extent possible. The site plan provides for retention of a significant number of existing trees and the initial plan for buffering material on the site's eastern border calls for !' retaining existing vegetation. Although further detail will be necessary regarding buffering materials, the applicant's intent is utilize as much of the existing vegetation as possible as a I g g p '' . buffer. C�.6. requires buffering between different land uses. As C. Policy 1 r qu g discussed above under Site Development Review, the site plan fies Code requirement.% for setbacks and provides an adequate buffer width although Additional information will be necessary regarding buffer matNrials. It is recommended that the Commission delegate 11 th,e` responsibility for review of the revised plan buffer p to staff. In addition to satisfying setback and buffer width requiremer„its, the site plan also locates recreation facilities in the center of the proposed development and places ng units at a all. dwelling distance from the site s boundaries far in excess of the required setbacks in order to attempt to • . . miti g at e effects o f the proposed development on neighboring uses. d. Policy 7.2.1 will be Pied when additional engineering work is completed for accommodating storm drainage above and within the development. The Washin-.., en County Bull 1 ountain Communit. y plan d applied .lied to the property prior .to;l annexation , identified a drainage Swale on this ,property running south to Summer Creek. The swale is not classified as a significant wetland or wildlife habitat area requiring special protection. The conceptual plan for replacing open drainage ditches I � within this swale with storm sewers fies Sensitive Lands approval criteria as previously discussed, as long as capacity E; issues can be appropriately handled through the detailed engineering work on the storm sewer system. e. Policy 7.1.2, 7.3.1, and 7.4.E ar e fled because adequate water,' sewer, and storm drainage facilities are available to the development. The applicant indicates that these facilities will be provided within the subdivision as required by City st and 7rds. L', f. Policy 8.1.1 calls for a safe and efficient street system. that meets current and projected needs. The proposed site plan • proposes g y provision ro osea widenxn of Scholia f'err Road and rov�sion '. of a sidewalk along the site's , frontage. The applicant's traffic study has appropriately 'concluded that projected traffic from the • the site will not significantly affect levels of service on adjacent roadways. The_- traffic study also concludes that the proposed ;.. accesSes to the developrrtent are properly designed to handle peak traffic loadings without causing Safety or traffic Congestion Problems. The City's' Engineering Division has examined the traffic study and has concurred with these conclusions. g: Policy 8.1.3 will be fled when the conditions of approval relating to street iniprovements are Completed. I 41; I , ETAFF REPO RT - SIR 8� A7 Xi� Gar p oration Pa ge 15 I, I I o . . The Planning Division has determined th�ni. the proposal, with minor modifications that should be required, to be made prior to building I; . permit issuance, is consistent with relevant portions of the Community Development Code based upon the following findings: , a. Chapter 18.56 (R-25 zone) is Lied because the proposal conforms with use, density, and applicable dimensional requirements of the R-25 zone. • b. Chapter 18.84 `sensitive Lands) is fied because appropriate 4' being proposed to mitigate any stores drainage measures are beY " problems related to regrading of the property and the replacement . drainage ditches with storm sewers. ' e site of open drama c. Chapter 3.8. p 86 is fied because the site plan provides for ' appropriate distances between multi-family residential buildings ` to assure privacy to residents and adequate light to all units. } d. Chapter 38.300 (Lan d o aping and Screening) as fled because p lass for tree retention a nd added landscaping fy Code requirements ts for minimum site area landscaping, street trees, and parking lot i reening. Additional information on plant materials within required buffer areas and on swimming pool area fencing will be $' provided on a revised landscaping plan. p p.n g P . I ,: • e. Chapter 18.102 (visua l clearance Area s) is fied because th e .s site plan does not place signs, trees, or structures within the required clear vision area at driveway/road intersections. f. • Chapter 18.106 (Off-Street Parking) is Tied because the site plan fies Code requirements for number of total parking spaces provided, number of covered parking spaces, number of designated handicapped parking spades, compact. to standard parking apace ratio, and all a pp licable parking area design standards. . Chapter 18.108 Access, Egress, and Circulation) is fied because g - � ( the site plan provides for safe and efficient access and egress for the proposed use and for general circulation or.n the site despite the siteie limited frontage on SW Scholis Ferry Road. The requested variance to allow two accesses to serve the site qu` sses for a development of this where3s� the Code re x.reti faun aces size, is° justified as previously described.`' Reduction' in the number of accesses is not anticipated to negatively impact the ability of emergency service providers to serve the proposed developmeint. The reduced number of accesses also Will eliminate or reduce traffic impacts upon the neighborhood to the east as ,. have additional accesses into the compared to a plain that would. h Cotswald development I ; h. Chapter 1.8.120 (Site Development iev'iew) is fied because the �m rove .en`s to be located so as proposed buildings s and other a g trees and to minimite alterationS to the site se existing topography raph and drainage systems, The site plan also situates the buildin+ s Aso as � to provide for privacy and light for the proposed dwelling units and STAFF REPORT SDA 89-07 xY2 Corporation Page 16 • I o . I r to assure compatibility ;'between the proposed development and adjacent uses. i. Chapter 18.150 (Tree Removal) will be fied upon the applicant obtaining a tree removal permit prior to removing trees in preparation for development. Permits will be granted only if it is found necessary to remove the trees to accommodate structures, driveways, utilities, or other proposed site • improvements. The site plan illustrates trees within the development that will be retained. An arboriat'e report outlining methods of protection for the trees to be retained must issuance of a site e submitted prior to the i grading permit or • b P ' tree removal permit. j, chapter 18.164 (Street and Utility Standards) will be fled upon approval of public improvement plans for and construction of the proposed improvements Scholia Ferry, Road and public sanitary on SW y and storm sewer extensions. Approval of public improvement tans required prior issuance of building p F permits and tree removal permits the proposed�development. . D. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Division recommends approval of Site i Development Review Th g - nce V 89-27, Lot Line Ad i nt e M 89-08, and f. SDP. g9 07; W�ria r 7 Sensitive Lands St 89-03, subject to the following conditions: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET PRIOR TO RECORDING THE PROPOSE D LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT. 1. The garage an Tax Lot 600, which is sht;,wn to straddle the 4' • proposed adjusted property line between the parcels, shall be removed Prior to recording the P ra os adjustment. A demolition permit shall b e obtained p rior to moving or destroy&.ng ��• •• the garage and house. STAFF CONTACT: Brad Roast, Building Division, 639-4171, Ext. 311. } . 2. The lot line adjustment survey maps and legal descriptions e ,approved by the City Engineering staff prior to applicant recording the adjustment with Washingt an Cpoy. STAFF CONTACT: Jon Feigion, 639-4171, Ext. 375 : UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET PRIOR TO '' o THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. 1 Seven sets of plan and rofile public improvement construction i plans and one (1) P itemized ' con:str fiction cost estimate, stamped by a Registered Professional Civil Engineer. detailing all proposed public improvements shall be submitted to the Engineering Division for approval. Two (2) sets of plan and profile lane shall be submitted for preliminary review prior to P p submittal of final plans. STAFF CONTACT: Cary Alfsbny Engineering Division, 839-4171. extension 378. ' 2. Construction of proposed public improvements shall not doMmende unt`1 after. g i�.neez i g Division has approved public the En in Divia x , corporation Page 17 . p t plans The section will require a 100 percent performance assurance or letter of 3.It1 rq�v�1I1Pn ' commitment, an developer- engineer agreement, the payment of a permit fee and a sign installation/streelight fee. Also, the execution of a street opening permit or construction compliance agreement shall occur prior to, or concurrently with the issuance of approve public improv ement plane.. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering • Division. • 3. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the State ate of Oregon Highway Division, to perform ,work within the right--of--way of SW Scholia Ferry Road. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Division prior to issuance of a Public • Improvement P `CONTACT. Gary Alfsonp , m Permit. STAF F 4. The proposed privately-operated and maintained parking lot and/or roadway plan-profile and cross section details shall be provided as part of the public improvement plans. STAFF CONTACT: Gary Alfson. 5. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the State along ° the SW Scholls Ferry Road frontage to increase the right-of-way to 45 feet 'f from the centerline. . STAFF CONTACT: Jon Feigion. 6. TheP rop P oeed privately operated and maintained sanitary sewer and storm drainage system plan-profile details shall be provided as P provi part of the public improvement plans. STAFF CONTACT: Greg ' $err ,�'En Engineering Division 639-411 1 extension�' g g r 7 , 373. 7. _ The applicant s nt shall de monata ate that at s torm drainage run-off can be dischar ged to a public facility of adequate capacity and that on-site storm sewers are adequately sized to accommodate anticipated flow in ac dordan c'e With the City of Tigard Master i Drainage Plan. STAFF CONTACT: dreg Berry- 1 8 Sanitary sewer and storm drainage details shall be , Sanitary - g 1 e provs.ded as , part of the public improvement plans. Calculations and a r topographic map of the storm drainage basin and sanitary sewer service area shall be provided as a supplement to the public improvement plans. The submittal shall include an evaluation for applicant to install the need of. a public Sanitary sewer through . the.. a • � Greg the. site and in SW SC�Sollb Fe y Road, STAFF. CONTAC g rr Road CONTACT: g Berry. y service 9. Evidence demonstrating the availability of sanitary ��ewe:, servic by the City of Beaverton shall be submitted as part of the public im pr ovement Plans, STAFF CONTACT:. John Ha gman 10. Public storm and sanitary sani ta r r Y y ss ewer lined phall. b e anstalled within � 15 feet easements, The easements shall be executed and recorded on Cit.. Standard forms and referenced on and become art of al oles that p all pp'. mile parcel deeds. ,� Will become publicly Y Owned a driveWay a t�.c hall be located within the traveled ti�ay of a d ' Y unless otherwise approved by the Engineering Division. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry STAFF REPORT SDR 89. 07 XYZ Corporation - Page 18 - 11. Access to the site during construction; shall be from SW Scholia Ferry Road only.� ly. Park, g construction vehicles or of I Parking of constru+c vehicles owned by those employed at the site will not be }. permitted in the Cotswald neighborhood. STAFF CONTACT: John Bagman.' 12. The applicant shall provide for connection nectian of proposed buildings$ to the public sanitary sewerage system as proposed. A connection permit is required, to connect to the existing public sanitary sewer system. STAFF CONTACT: Brad, Roast. 13. Prior to co maaencement of site clearing and grading, a plan for capping the well on Tax Lot 600 in compliance with State of .n . Oregon regulations, must be prod by the Washington County Watermaster"s office ( Clayton Gardner, 681-70-' A py co of the Watermaster's review and approval of the :last be provided to the Building Division. Building Divi: �.�;., field , inspectors shall assure that the plan is complied with during • preparation building ermit approval. site preparation a.n advance- of '.final g p pp 14. A revised landscaping, plan shall be submitted for Planning Division approval which provides for additional information on buffering materials. Buffer area materials (including existing vegetation) must fy the minimum buffer mat erial size and spacing specified by Code Section 18.100.080. The landscaping plan shall also b e revised to ref lect other changes that have been made to the site plan. STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Offer, Planning Division. 15. PRIOR TO ANY SITE GRADING OR CLEARING, an arborist's report shall be submitted which outlines which trees p axe to be ' reserved, a nd the methods of which they will be protected during and after construction.field visit involving the developer, a staff accomplished e and with thconstruction. Staff recommends arborist to adequately identify the trees. STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Offer. 16. Fencing with a minimum height of 6 feet shall be installed around the drip line of all trees proposed for retention prior to any construction on the site. The fencing shall be inspected and approved by the consulting ar�►orist and the , prior to permit issuance. Any later land clearing W p i 'ng work within. the drip line shall be performed by hand. A qualified arborist p site i minimum p, during shall inspect the site at a minimum of one time Per week du construction to ensure that the tree preservation a Program outlined in the above-mentioned arborist's re p ort is being followed.. STAFF CONTAC`r Jerry Offer. p Prior to any tree removal 17 A tree removal Removal shall obtained on the site permits be issued for trees designated for protection in the approved arborist's report i unless sufficent cause is Verified by the CC)nsulting, arborist: 8TAFp" CONTACT: Jerry Offer; . 18. A revised site plan Shall be submitted for Planning, Division approval Which includes the following ateims c STAFF REPORT 7W SDR 69-07 -+ XYZ Corporation W Page 19 a • I . { 1. Elimination of, the previously proposed pond and second •swimming pool and exercise/eommunity' building . r 9 swimming pool minimum `height of 2. Fencing around the sw�:mmin of area at a .min'' . four feet. Any gates into the swimming pool area shall be equipped with a self-latching mechanism. STAFF INTACT: Jerry offer. Prior to an issuance of an occupancy permit for any new buildings on the site, the" fallowing. conditions shall be met to the faction of the Planning Division. STAFF CONTACT: Jerry Offer. 1» All landscaping materials, permanent fencing and other P ro po sed site improvements shall 'be installed as Per the approved landscaping and site plans. 2. A sign permit shall be obtained prior to the erection of an identification Sign. Sign location and size must be in accordance with provisions of Section 18.114 of the Community Development code. THIS' APPROVAL APPROVAL .SHALL BE VALID OF EXERCISED WITHIN EIdI3TEExY MONTHS OF THE FINAL . APPROVAL DATE. i ,, ,..i ill 1 4 11' • epar=• by; der y ; £ A..proved by: Keith widen Assis planner Senior Planner -. br/hard e Xy zllay.sdr • • STAFF REPORT - SDR 89-07 - XY2 corporation --<Page 20 ., v9,. .. ., . _,__, . . ' ( ' -'' ' Ti u) • 1 xi ..,..,V,,. ..� .:ai .,:c-:I..«,r.. uu:u.,...�.7.....J..... r.r:.y.,..�7w......e.,..... »a.,. ....;..:.�:t:.aW...,:�-.Jaa.w;. ..�u'.:::u,4....+�.....r».;�,:..wz«:a:.w,ldi:•Ni..,., ry,a.F,.nw..nn1'ata.S,,,n•wr.,,..Fi...;J:..�.n.yl+.w-:�,Yri.�-Yrw.,�.,,.A'w•«�., ., • A •„- - • i 1 I HEFFIEL1 `” .4...?.4 -fr. e � DIY/. � �4 • i _I P° -1--i r-r I Er N w et SW. ASHBURY L.11). -� I s. 10 -Ili nil ' \ \ T'E -<4 a S.LiV FEII:tING LN. a LAU \ 1I ' Mt sr C7 .', 'Sri F "I ''✓ (1 ' S W. E6%9 M MORNING 1 .. � z 111 11-,. .-, p IIII S 3 5 4 ,� ,� r `• ` sW. H11+D01` v' ET�151bNi ' . ■ ''''--- r (---.F.T.--T f Y' moo. •rww�wit+r+..+rw rte'_� ,wr�� r . i S.W. klAIR'T STS 1 • April 9 A r p 19, 1989 k r J , Keith Liden, Senior Planner City of Tigard City Hall liY and Oregon 97223 , . RE: WOODSIDE VILLAGE APPLICATION Dear Mr. Liden: 1' The residents of Cotswald strongly`oppose the application for the " apartment village planned for Cotswald IV which was filed last week. ' Allowing apartments to be ,• � more artments p built in the area is extremely detri- mental to our home values, and is in direct conflict with the information we were given about the planned ""homes of equal or greater valueu when we purchased our homes, not to mention the impact an additional 290 three-story, apartments would have on the quality of life ` in our neigh- borhood. We are. already surrounded by about 500 apartments a few feet from our property lines on the north and south, and those will soon be joined by over 70 more approved in the Sunflower Apartments and several hundred more in the Srabhorn project. When a rcity allows the "building down" of. 1 an area zoned for R-25, such as ours was, and, adddltlonally, allows a should omshow to lure prospective purchasers to the area it seems the city make an exclusion to the addition of any further apartment• con-- ul • . action i apartment 'is already bearing the burden of the city of struction in an area which Tig p zoning ... " It app ears the single-family resadentao� p lit map on file wath 'the city records (where we were told we must check for accurate information by the City of Tigard Hearings Officer, Beth Mason) was there onl y as a smokescreen. Over 50,000 people paid $5.00 each to attend the 1987 Street Homes and saw the plat maps posted in garages, the van at of Affordable Mara es, one end of the show street bearing a large poster with an arrow pointing to Cotswald IV and stating the future development purposes,of the large wooden sign sowing:. the single--family lots. This barrage of visual docu- mentation _.. ntationuas supplemented by the builders and realtors represented in the home show. Unfortunately, y purchasers have also been they man recent purcha�s this I ,. mislead when the have contacted the city, which further complicates i situation. A municipality',, as a governing body, should protect the rights of l not just those of developers, corporations, large and-owners all its resiorx�long long-term residents. By creating this Urban growth area, and j .1 now sponsoring.6a home show, - Tigard _h which ' ich You you extended a bond of o4d. fait seek to break. It bodes ill for the City,,of .�igard to foster a reputation of this nature ATTACHMENT • _,:; uw.. ',,,.,r.,,, .,a;,,,,,,, .,. ,,,;r.. ,„,r ,,.:, ,, u,:,:;'r,r. ,,.,:, ,..,' zw ..,..,, a .. .. ..... ..... .,, ...,,, .. ,,.,. ,. .., _,,,..a... ...,.,,..,.,..,w,,., ,,.... a,,. ,..•,..,,,....,w., ,. ,.,..,,,,,» ,. wOCDSIDE , • • VILLAGE APPLICATION Page. 2 ;.. As well as stating herein our total.; opposition. to the application, we have prepared a list of changes we feel are necessary in the apPlica-• tion, g we are allowed in veioin3 We well realize the ;ti tight time frame , andhtherneedoto� ®icl�l �,re istercani�chanres we would ent p - 1rX,is apartment develo meat, object request � like to see, � � f_ the same time, • conformances requires us to both g � cone es at but we want to have these on 'the, public record. • have talked at length to the residents of Co • `` � tswald and their ` , concerns, and objections are mine,. _ With that in mind I present th � p the g g by th following list of modifications requested b e. Cotswald Neighborhood .,. in the Woodside Village a pplication: 1 . Instead of proposing a new property line set 15' back on the Scholls Ferry side, leave the existing'property line in place, allowing the a entire project to set back an additional 15' from Cotswald III 2. Provide a 20' setback (instead of 10' ) on the' property paralleling Ashbury Lane., 3. Eliminate the daycare site This area is already saturated. Grabhorn • w . has 4a daycare site planned and Kindercare and`"Children's Learning World on 1126th can hold` 85 'more children. Daybridge Daycare is only slightly further away and can enroll 25 more children. With 4 daycares within a mile there seems little.need for another. This land should instead� parking vehicles in C��rages -15. (46 ark and carports 19-23 (22`„carS) to) place those unsightly rows of structures� c ructures awa. from Cotswald III. 4. Put garages in place' of open parking and carports (open parking 6c, 9c, 3s, 7s, 12c, 3c, 8c, 9s, and 10s = 69 cars, and carports 16 and 18 = 22, for a total of 91 cars) which would then be completely . ed nearest Cotswald. III. { covered . : The street and entrance into these garages should also be on the • apartment (west) sides Repropose`'the flood lighting for our appro- val after the site plan is redone; 5. Put Bldg. yp . 'T' ,...e A where the three Building #80 Type E are located, and angle buildings so the windowless end of the buildings face Cotstiwald III, There should be no decks or upper--story windows Cotswal P facing d III. 8. Angle buildings g in location., of gx l in g 9-12 so the windowless end f. of the buildings faces Cotswold II e w \ 4 ■ • y • " I R WOO SIDE VILLAGE APPLICATION 4.1' Page ` 7. Relocate .the potentially nois Y recreation facilities along alcn g Scholle Ferry Road where the street noise will not be as noticeable to the users as it would be to the residents of any apartments along Scholls d 8. Place a 10:00 P.M. curfew on the use of all recreation facilities. rl " 9. Replace the Lombardy Poplars along the east property line with . 4 mature m Canadian Hemlock, They are evergreen versus deciduous, which will, rovide better Year round privacy' a nd less cleanup. 10. In the buffer zone on the north and west side of the property between , Cotswald III and the apart':aents All buffer zone work (landscaping,ping, walls, trees, etc. ) must be completed to Cotswald satisfaction before construction of the ' Woodside village' begins " At a minimum of 40' from the property line, construct a 10' high ' berm (using as a base height the land height behind 11721 SW Wilton) /1 -; On top of the berm construct a 6' real used brick wall to be main` tanned by Woodside Village with a locked black iron gate in, the °'', • brick wall at Morning Hill Drive for emergency fire access (if such is deemed rY ecessary) ,. . „• 10" wall t® the east of the bb L�C ` p a7 wa na ian Hemlock ' 10' apart • • - Plant 6' arborvitae 18" on center, 2' west and north of property line along fence/property line on the Cotswald III side • f 11. No dogs or cats al » . Rowed in the apartr�ernts. 12. No garage wore done in the Woodside Village. 13. Owner's name and telephone number, and Lana a• tanager's s name g' ' and telephone n. unber given to designated Wilton property owners and the Neighbor- hood Watch Ca tains n 14: xn`ta UL-Approved security systents on all 1 ag single-family mily residences Wilton Avenue (9 homes) and Ashbury Lane (3 homes) . 3.5. Exterior: ' Cedar Fir Siding (Clapboard) No T I c, I ICI.. ..,.. . ... ....,,-. a,r r,.♦,+,n.%.s.+4.•,w4.A i. ..,.a..r.r. �..ar:r,v'H+N�'t-,.- WOODSIDE VILLAGE APPLICATION Page ♦ 1 Real used brick on ends of buildings facing CotsWald f•, Earthtone Paint in a single color throughout the Woodside Village (Light to Medium. Gray or Light Brown) Cedar Shakes or single color tile roofs in Light Gray or Light Brown Tile (same as those on the Meadow Creek_Apartments on S.W. North Dakota) 16. During the` construction phase: - No construction 'before 8:00 A.M. , of terr 5:00 P.M. , or on weekends durin No music playing g construction I I -.- No animals brought to the :site r . - No construction traffic, on Morning Hill or Ashburye, No access at all through d 'during construction,' and no parking in Cotswald Access only through the Schoils Ferry Road entrances4 I Jj j I s Brenda, /. ':i 1pixn On behalf of the Cotswa d Neighborhoods N \ T. r/ick.m \-11 LL. r .. q, Cc NFC � ti a ' a.�". raw..•. A rh ... .,. M.,... ., ry..r. r,•r,.. .r a ., r .�.•.. , ., ., .rr .....,. ..,�• .. .,• ._. n I I rl,,..r.., r.,..,,.. .r,....,..,.,u r...., ,..,,.,.•. ,r,r,,,,•.,a ,•.�, u.r,,..,,,, ... u „ ,w r I � X . Y. ..,..e-. . 10260 S.W. GREEN LIRG ROAD s r q M �_� :� SUITE 400 _ PORTLAND OR 97223 pp_ T` 5o3/293.8a6a C 0 It P 0 It A 'P I O N FAX•503/293•8499 ; Mr. Keith Liden May 19, 1989 Senior Planner Co•munity Development Department City of Tigard RECEIVED 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 mY 1 9 1989 Re. Woodside'de Village application Community . Dear Keith; After carefull review of the April 19, 1989 letter written to you y Gilpin the residents of the Cotswald b .:Mrs� Brenda G�.l a.n on bohalf, of subdivisions and the comanents of residents at the several meetings relating to our proposed apartment project we have made two changes , ' •to our plan which are shown on the attached "Site Reference Plan." :1 1• The sideyard which abuts the rear yards of the homes fronti.nc R Ashbury Lane has been increased to 15 feet. 2. A 6 foot high wood fence is shown along the rear of the .. property where we border the single le family homes. • s Additionally f we have made the following general changes: A. handicapped parking is shown. The spaces are located to match • the handicap units and the office/community buildings B. Garages have been reduced •� , ,, to 100 spaces; � ha have e been reduced to 190 spaces; total p arkin g remains at 515 spaces. • Also enclosed is a copy of my letter dated April 28, 1989 to James l3oylari the NPO president together with three attached drawings that are explained in the text. This letter with its drawings was distributed to and discussed with the residents bordering our site at a meetin�g on April 2 9. We have only y recei'ved one reply regarding proposals. ' � � .�, i g `n.g Hill. Drive a t Wilton ,�,v n�xe �tat�d�hY of preferrence for�o�t�.anr'B" shown on the street change proposal. As a result of the lack of interest in any of our proposals, We must consider them was rejected by the i.esidents and withdraw them from further consideration. As to the o pp osition to our Project expressed in Mrs. Gilpin's letter .. it pp ears that the central �SSie is the x eszden. s f r ustration resulting from their eXecration that our site would d ATTACHMEIT TWO • • {yLL I • be ueveloped with single family detached homes. This , misunderstanding was not caused by us and, although we have . attempted to quell their fears and anger, I must report we have had little success. However, I believe that they are mistaken in their presumption that our proposal will necessarily decrease their property values and quality of life. Woodside Village should prove ' . ° to be a positive 'e asset in Tigard with its .,site-sensitive ambiance ' and stylish architectural appeal more typical of higher priced • projects. Certainly, it should not be mistakenly compared with projects which lack our amenities and quality features. It should be noted that our proposal is 20% below the permitted density in this zone and our project design provides open spaces that are much ' larger than typically found in comparable projects : .' ' . In z response to the specific requests in Mrs. Gi 1pin's letter 1. Th increased right- of--way on New Scholls Ferry Road is dictated to us by the State Highway Department and sound engineering design. Therefore, it cannot be eliminated. 2. In consideration of the residents on Ashbury I►ane, we have ' increased our side yard set-b ack to 15 feet where our project abuts their rear property line 3. Althoug h the day care facility is distinctly p art of our p p is not inclusion of the apartment site review submitted � partm it The inclusion of. the designated „ overall d,e �.tted ea,s of ldate. ` s intended to be for information only at this time. However, use l > 3. ` ` We are aware d raised and deserves a response. that other day care facilities exist or are proposed osed in, the area the issue has been p and our decision to include one in this project is in part, a W business matter rather than a planning issue except as to its T - conformance with the City's planning requirements. Certainly, however• the Cit y is not going to inject itself into regulating g competition in this rapidly eXpanding service business. We consider' this to be an e>cellent location for such a center and expect that most Of its capacity Will be filled by our own residents' children, we also believe that its inclusion in our plan serves the City's interests as well as our own. The further' suggestion that residents• further gg i i is of the eastern side of our project Should park on the property �. p Y' i opposite side of the pro ' s unacceptable. 4. The locati an of garages e.nd Carports in ou r plan was carefully ' n , ° i they will be proportionately arranged with the considered so that . . -y grouping living units. .�rbtrari,l roupin them on one side is not acceptable to us nor would it constitute good planning. .i«.«.,.,.. JaN...r-..l.-I .rl«F...:«..... ..,,... 4« ..R.._ �,.1..J...r..+.L,Y+i.-. .. ....4.. - n 4n..d-. h+lrwC.a r.:..7-r n:f u _ •..t.,.....✓..:1..nn .... _. ..... Ja 1 n..n..111,y... .-.a ._.:--1-+•_ i • r 5 & 6. The building types and arrangement were carefully . considered by highly respected professional planners with attention to topography, environment and the overall community interests so as to create two separate internal environments for, the different household profiles that we have identified in an `extensive market analysis. This study was performed for us by "Real Estate Strategies" under the direction of Wallace Hobson whom we believe to be one of the ablest urban economists in the region and was used to guide the design concept and configuration in order to assure an attractive and successful rental community. . 7. The recreation facilities have been located centrally within ' the project so as to be comfortablly accessable to all our residents and within the suppervision of the on-site management off ices.' 8, 11 & 12 As to the `requests contained in these items, we are not prepared to specify different limitations on any lawfull activity b . Woodside g. residents that are not imposed on '' every other citizen of Tigard.y y de Villa e r dents t y °g Astute professional management will insist on orderly behavior within Woodside Village for the benefit of all residents in the neighborhood. 9. The Lombardy Poplars p1 ars previously shown have been replaced in x our plans with Douglas Fir r or Canadian Hemlock depending on their availabiltyv • • 10. The several requests included under a ` o opinion/ beyond any reasonble request made of any other residential oject in r. •• Tiard. In conversations with some of the residents, it was made clear to us that the intent of these requests wa s to create a financial burden which would prevent the development of the project entirely. Therefore, we have no choice but to reject (; them out of hand. 13. Upon completion letion the telep hone number of the appropriate ' ( manager will be listed publicly for any reasonable contact by a, residents of Wood side, village or others. for providing We are unable to accept the responsibility ( �.4 i. �' p� ng , i ° security systems to buildings outside our property. - i ` ._ i + architectural Y + .._. i + ,:..i required on our 15 �l�.hough arc eview is not r�: u subm±ssion we anticipate rusin r lap siding on all of the apartment, ''� brick is riot pa ro r i buildings. r a:ate to our des. However , pp p design and paint colors have not yet been Chosen Cedar Shakes� ake� are not permitted on this ;type of Structure, but we plan to use mineral { • 4. �u rya• . coated composition shingles in a slate grey color. 16. Regarding concerns expressed about activities during construction; our position is that work hours are p ro p erl y limited by the ordinances of the City of Tigard. As to playing of music, presumably the concern here is noise. We will, seek to maintain responsible limits on all activities during construction so as to not interfere with current residents' peaceful enjoyment of their homes. We consider animals on construction sites to be unsafe and will strictly enforce responsible safety regulations on-site throughout the construction phase. It is our 'intention to enclose the property with a security fence prior to commencing' construction and all traffic will be through entrances on New Scholis Ferry Road. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. If I can answer any `questions p,' p ease do not hesitate to call me. • an that develo lc Sincerely, M1 •i. Anthony G. Bonf orte j.. ■ Y :.-.✓+,I,,..u.w,it,i ..:w14.r.„.,.i,,.r.-.,I.<....]wu.O.H,.{.rw. r } " ' iv t 4,f /9 r May 14, 1988 + 'Keith Liden Senior Planner City of Tigard City Hall Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re Woodside Villge Application t b Dear Mr. Lide;n, On, April 19, 1989 Brenda Gilpin wrote a letter to you concerning the Woodside Village application. The following week a copy of the same letter was endorsed by members of NPO 4'7 during their monthly meeting. I feel this letter contained several inaccuracies that need td I' be brought out: 1) Brenda said she was wr.ting on behalf of the Cotswald Y neighborhoods.: I feel she is representing herself and, neighbors, but not all residents of the ". Cotswal i i, fewafher r d ne ghb�arhoods. � 2) She said the residents of Cotswald strongly oppose the application for the apartment village planned ' Again she'+and a few 'of her neighbors may oppose the planned project but not all the residents are against the project. 1 3)' I 1. t is my opinion that the uilding of the Woodside "V'illage apartments would not be detrimental to our home values. Gur home v alues and q uaLity of life would not be imvaired I because of the planned pro ject o I a 'm in favor of the Woodside Village Apart Tents as presented ,,. to the City of igaxd. Sincerely, I I, "dwaxd A i E fri � ggi g i 11828 2"71 7 g Hill 1 D r Toga , OR 97223 ATTACHME:NT THREE , , \ , , r , • -iG,.F ...„d+:: .Mw ,....:L......s-,i..,....d.i 4•..,:ci:.,..:.:,+•:.,:1::..,,....+.u,,.a...t,::..,......wr......-ru'«— .,,.,u,.:.....,,,t.:l:.,..«i«..w.1,f..,.,.,.a.:;• .., fd,,,"„. • ti �\' ',::';'f . pr;' KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES INC{„Jtt 9 �` r`r''',,, TRANSPORTRTION PLANNING/TRAFFIC ENGINEERING• ",� C'6 , BROADWAY PORTLAND,OREGON 97205,,(503)228-5230•FAX(503)273-8169 512 S.W. BR I I ' May 31, 1989 119B9 ,' ' I I 2 E�.00 Project No.: 3 • Mr. Jerry Offer II , Tigard Community Development Department 13125 SW Hall Boulevard • • 'Tigard Oregon 97223 �' D g SUBJECT: Woodside Village ll ag e Ap artment Complex bear Mr. Offer: The purpose of this letter is to formally request a variance to Community Development • Code, Section 18.108.070(b) for the subject project. This section of the Code appears to , require that multiple family residential developments containing between 200 and 300 • dwelling units be served by three or four accesses. In the original application in this I • , matter three accesses were requested, including one emergency access onto an abutting residential street in the Costwald Meadows Subdivision. The City of Tigard `Fire Department determined this third emergency enc access Icessary and, therefore, it g y s was u�xa.e b , was eliminated from the application. has informed us than because the application now The City Staff ha includes only two , to Community Development.. a variance pursuant t 'Code Section 18.108.150 is accessed p y It 's our understanding . now necessary. g that the Notice of this matter, properly indicated that this variance is required, and,' therefore, all, notice requirements have • been satisfied. , nit Development ment Code Section 18.108.150 allows for a variance to be granted Community p �' ions`can be demonstrated: tb this re airs'' following conditions mend if the folio 1) It is not possible to share access; I of p 'I I 4 • I 41,..1L.,r.. ...W«, ..nw1..1« C'' • f Mr. Jerry Offer May 31, 1989 Page 2 2) There are riot other alternative access points on the street in question or from another street; ` I, 3)` The access separation requirements cannot be met; 4 The request is the minimum variance required to provide adequate access; 5)' The approved access o r access approved with conditions will result in safe access; and 6) The visual clearance re q uirements of Chapter 18102 will be niet• The remainder of this letter addresses each of these eon.ttitions, and demonstrates that • site-generated traffic can be adequately accommodated ci y by two access drives while still maintaining acceptable levels of traffic operations and safety. 1. It is not possible to share access p development proposal, it is not possible to share access �itb. respect'to the current d ". without creatin g the potential for significant adverse traffic-related impacts on adjacent residential streets, Physically,sically such c onnections could be made with eJd.sting street stubs at SW Ashbur Lane and 'SW Mornini hill Drive y g ' e in the Cotswald Meadows , subdivision, However, the provision of such road connemion.s would introduce the � z " • potential for a scant amount of site-generated traffic to intrude into the abutting p ' neighborhood of single family residences: Generally accepted plan ling principles • nex There pp feasible urage this type of traffic pattern:+ are 1 disco ,� apparent and feas�b no olrhe Pfo with options for sharing access p 'th adjacent properties that could result in an increase in the total of driveways available to site-generated traffic, I I • II I I , • • sr ti w,e..w.....la.. w.nay....«::i<,,..M...�...t+F 4,— , + 44.4444.,-444.44,-m, 4+,4.4., .I • I H ew v 4,4,44 +w.414.4,;,W:..-.w ,rla r. �e r,1O Offer May 31989 4.• • Page 3 2 • There are not other alternative access points Under the current situation, no other alternative access points other than those identified above are available. ' I , access separation: •°� 3. The accc requi,remcrats cannot be met The available site frontage Ferry allow M n ita e SW New �cholls Ferr Road is not sufficient to sate fxox on � tar additional access points to be created without violating the 350-foot mialiTnumn. driveway spacing standard applicable to a State Highway, 4. The .access request is th e minimum variance required The traffic analysis prepared in support of this application concludes that two access Y p lP P drives can accommodate all and peak hour site-generated traffic while still 1 daily ° acceptable.. of traffic operations and safety. Through. separate maintaining ' levels inarntax.nx�. acce reviews, the Oregon Department of Transportation, the City of Tigard, and thc; local Fire District have not disputed ted. these fanduigs. at 5, The approved access will result in a safe access See the response to 4) above, The traffic impact analysis specifically considered) a number of issues related to traffic safety, including the availability of adequate intersection sight chstance, the history of and potential for additional vehicle accidents, and the need for and t'easib.lity of separate left-turn and right-turn refuge lanes. The • results of this analy sis support the conclusion that proposed two-driveway access design will result in a safe and efficient access system1 . ..nv. ,n ,•a.m ..w, .,.....« ... ... ..,,,a ,.,..,. ,., .n,= „ „« •. ,,r..... tee. ....... ... ..«,•, ,....« i ... ,.., .... ,. .•. „ 1 ....,.,,.W...- , .,,..,., ._. • I f • • .4::a.1..w.0V,+..,iAa444..,dGn,:.;u.e A ».....b«I ra..L:�a:.c rv..-...ai.+.a..«A.AAA ..«.;«,lx...�_ru.....4l. ...w. ._,++....-:.w..0 o-A A,A4 M,« .:..»�,.il*..,A:+M ii:al..:wl..�4.r....;,,«111+,1:w1..,-lirai.;. - . G�.;zaua:w:::uraua,v:.t.«i=+r...f„w»;:w,+...�.—,:,{..:..K«:,t5.•a'_::,'-.,I..w�:w :aw.u..._..«w:iilk r I Mr. Jerry Offer May 31, 1989 4 Page 4 6'. The visual clearance requirements of Chapter 18.102 will be met q ' ction sight distance can be provided at See the response to 5) above. Adequate xnterse g p' both of the proposed access drives for all, approaching vehicles. • • In view of the discussion presented above and in order to eliminate traffic impacts of the proposed develo p ment on the immediately adjacent Cotswald Meadows subdivision, we hereby formally request your approval of this access variance. Y, If you have any additional comments or questions related to this matter that I might . be able to answer, please do not hesitate to contact me. c+• oxncerely, I Wayne . Kittelson • Principal • I , I , I I' I I . I N • , r ' . I t I , r.4,,t�._ .,.., r r ..., arFr tJ.:::':� :.»u—„Wd,1.L •' ' • M - 1 - 9�y�"'�, 4� E /3 i ii 2 E 6.,.A ., 1..: L4 A`l tw 1'1 0'J - ca P p BEAVERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT FAX TRANSMITTAL TO: `�'”" FAX NO. : •.� / ADDRESS• PHONE: C , FROM: e r J DATE: ' � .,� A 0.4.- c � C t " + �.. , OUR FAX NO. : (503) 591-4415 • TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET. IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES, PLEASE CALL BACK AS SOON AS POSSTBLEa PHONE (503) 13/FAX � i+!�. �:."::�'�z•�-�Aa�::-�;�.�..h tee.. - a...�:..�,�., .,.. ' r i rr-» w N...r.a,.WA vA4+Y... NN..w..w«.w-..u..+.,: htdalY -- 1. ..... 891 WED 1 : 2 2 I i i BEAVERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT SUPPLE. E '.'Q IMPACT STATEMENT' Development X.YZ Corporation Da;te 193 Nia . 3.�. ` ti. i • Projected Nut ber of Available Students School . Current* from this School Name Capacity Enrollment Proposal Elementary ll'ew School 528 0 20 r ; Intermediate , Highland Park 1000 896 1 High lea v Beaverton 1800 1/34 9 ' mme its Additional School District would anticipate 41 school-age students I�i:s fromer your proposal osal to construct 9 - � a �. dwellings (please refer to memo of August 198 7)290 multiple-family� 3 �1' The number of students projected from•your proposal•can he housed at the above ire s qualification: schools, with the following ,�ualifieata:�an. ElerrMentary Le,v.elt in September 1989 a new elementary school. will • open Projected enrollment is 444 at the time this school opens Due to rapid residential. growth in this portion of the District, we anticipate the new 'school will be at capacity, in 2 years. Options for housing the projected gxowt'h in this area are very limited, as all elementary schools in the southwest partyon of the District tW i�.rry'ct built-out 1• t o maXlmum ca.",acit and enrollments near or over capacity at each school.. '; Also, the District has been unable t o .purchase property for the construction of additional facilities. Until such time property ca //+�, approve as x r�new p�.rc��.ased and. voters Ga� :L.oV a fl.lnds for Yi • i pp ne facilities, our housing options include portable classrooms and most likely- double shifting students in this area„ nce Pflug Joy-Gay Pair, �er�y � Director, Demographic ''aca.lites & trans. 591-4319 591/4310 *Kinderga •ten studef.ts, are calculated at 1/2 for houtirig, ftic:iiity ,pu.rposes Mwwr`•.uii�._ 4-ck.L . :. ..:;.:.,.;4a.,r':+i�.M a...y..+-.—+.++w.«...r•., Mw • t4 04 Y 1 -- W E: /I i ? : C ► . i Li C,, it I ro .. C3 r � ' 3eaverton Schools ra. C a strict No. 48 p.O, Box 200 Beaverton,'Oregon 97075 503/591-8000 • August 17, 1987 • Beaverton School District has completed an update of its demographic survey. survey of the purpose The pur determine the average number of students per P � is to d dwelling unit. This information will assist us in anticipating futura, enroll- ments within new housing developments, and will aid in planning for the most efficient use of school facilities. As a result of this survey, we will use the following factors to project student populations in new housing developments: • SINGLE-FAMILY. DWELLINGS .46 preschool children per dwelling .29 elementary students per dwelling .12 intermediate student, per dwelling -11 high school students per dwelling -52 total school-,age students per dwelling(1) MULTIPLE FAMILY/CONDOMINIUM DWELLING .07 elementary y stud= ents p er dwel l i n. .04 i ntermedi ate students per dwelling ng .03 high school students per dwelling .14 total school-Cage students per dwelling(1) (1) Grades 1-12 II I oy-(;ay Idf1 Detiiographic Data Specialist { JA3/LE,T r R3, I' I I d I I r ' .....iw,..,.. t...�;...�>r�1_,,.:--.au..,..1M;Fat,.t.,...,....a,.:..�...>_..,.•:'.,;,•.,r..u... ,;.._µ... .a�' .,....�....: ,.....,..M. ...„,......«..:».ad........u,,..;:.l..+r,.....w �.. .....r,.,;,.•„ . ,-«„w...,,.,1,,..,...,:�,,..,.,•.a.r.�.:mttiv..�:.. ,.::,1.w.�,..HS.T9... _.,w....,., ::' hr1. �...u.,+....�k:,r..,,,.+.•...:.�wA-.:k.«., ' ro.-.... ...u,..r--..a ;.2...�,.. 'f+._.x ..[rw.. '»esw. ...t•.r.41.«: .,r.Nw,.. .,CL,+t,..._ _,. j June 6, 1989 Cif f av rto , t 1i and Plannin De ent g �' A r PJB 23397 • 'gard, OR 97223 fi Att: J _ Of_fer ; r er`ry Re: SDR 89--07/V89-15/NLLP 89--a7 r y (Rrueger�-Pollock/XYZ Corporation) ` , r As discussed, ]3eaver°ton's transportation plan identifies that Scholls Ferry ;. Road (see atrtached) align with Davies Road to the north. Based upon that fact, the city would recommend that the following conditions be unposed on the above noted proj ect. r a. - Access onto Schholls Ferry Road should be limited to one access ,; and that access be at the Soutierr property line. - Participation in a local improvement district for the following r improvements -- S is l Ferry realignment construction of the ►�cho1 --construction of a traffic signal at the old Scholls Ferry/Davi_es load ntersection -construction of a traffic signal' at the new New Scholls Fe y r Road/Davies intersection - Construction of a left turn. lane on Scholls Ferry Road at the driveway , -- Sidewalk improvements'along Scholls Ferry Road ; -- Dedication for the improvement of Scholls Ferry/Davies Road. ! d lease feel free to If ou h contact me at 526-2.424. ave gtxestion.5 p 1 r �' any �� � . is S,z.nce:rely, t I t , t B l ±m nend�� it Principal Planner w ,: r t r I i i I JI-i.htld i 606mjh ' Y f '� I I i r L, j i ��/j i w i '�, 4.755 SW Griffith [Drive, P,O 8ox 4755, Beaverton, Cain 9.7076, Geheral Information* (503) 526-2222 A - An Equni opportunity Employer t t ..,.':;... • � ;. .r..,..; ••. ..�.� ..,,. �r :. .�r.r.. .. ._. ..:. 1 r.n�;.� ....A „ • w�,... .. .... .0. ...r ,.....� ,•...,, • r........ .... ...... .� ......�... ...,... r,• _.... �,..... .,...:I,r...... ...r.�, r , J. • ivlcKeever Morrri 9 I • For The Record: Wood Village Conditions of Approval Agreement. 7:30 p.m. June 6, 1989 U. Between XYZ Corp. chi Cotswald Neighborhood Group • • • (Before the City of Tigard Planning Commission) My name is Paul Morris. 1 am a landscape architect for McKeever/Morris, Inc., a planning and design firm based in Portland, Oregon. We represent the Cotswald Neighborhood Group. On their behalf we speak before you this evening. As you have heard from testimony, the residents who live within the Cotswold neighborhood adjacent to the proposed Wood Village housing project share strong feelings of opposition towards • the rapid growth of multi-family housing near their homes. • Despite their general opposition, the neighbors understand the realities related to this project and believe that it is in the best interest of the developer, the city and themselves to work toward a • provides degree all affected`parties. To common solution which rovices a reasonable de ee of satisfaction for this extent, they requested that we meet with the applicant, consultants to Bonforte and his con address and resolve concerns and needs the neighbors have identified for creating a sensitive and compatible development. Those meetings have resulted in the following agreement. . P P The Cotswald Neighbors agree to withdraw their opposition to the approval of the Wood Village application contingent upon the Planning Commission's inclusion of the following list of ten items as stated in its entirety as conditions of approval. It is the full package of these items included.as - conditions of approval which constitute this agreement. The Coraditi Hof Au roval include that; 1. The app ds s provide minimum twenty foot (20') rear fifteen foot (15') side yard setbacks as landscaped buffer zones for all of the applicant's properties adjacent to the Cotswold • Neighbors, 2. Enclosed garages with la p_p ed siding and peaked composition roofs shall be installed for all parking spaces adjacent to the Cotswald Neighborhood as shown on the applicant's submittal, ' 3, No street or outdoor area lighting shall be directed off or away from the applicant's proposed development. ` 6) shall along the fall length of + �. A substantial buffer fence (S'ee condition arior� to��n c®her site demolition or ,.1 no. , properties abutting the Cotswaldf Neighborhood p y .� grope g gy ( .non-damaging . protect construction. This fetace shall ri tr est el iixi�er oaf� a other 1 cant's sidt��T'he a nli,c �shall install a .. y vegetation a o g, +.. p y e pp . . pP ll the integrity of required landscape ape:planting and iriigation as early as is practicably possible. 812 S.W. 1It i'nxtlettd,Oregon 97205 (O )228-7152 1 • ..i,.,,,.. ,.i..c. .,,.,,:, ..1......,. .....u,..m,.11t.., . ...a,.l x. ... «wk,.„...:.::.,i«.....u:...�.-.,..:......wm...:; .......,.....,.,.a..x.:.-..a.n...., .. •,.,,ai.xuu.....:w..>-.+ua.>,.M.::,w»--_M.,cM>. .....-.y,.r.;:.a...,-...wMv'ad:.:w.w.;w»w..7iUlai.: • 5. The applicant shall establish the required bufferzones'prior to any other construction on the , • site and these zones shall be marked, protected from all unnecessary disturbance during the construction process and selectively repaired to the minimum extent necessary to ensure long term stabilization of this area. t 6. A "solid wood and concrete post"fence shall be constructed along the rear and side yards of the applicant's property abutting all Cotsvvald Neighbors. This fence shall be located one foot(1') into the applicant's property line and built to the following specifications: • Twelve inch (12") square eight foot(8')tall posts at every property corner and one at the r middle of each property, and four inch(4") square eight foot(8')tall pressure treated cedar posts set in a concrete footing at every other necessary location. • Six foot (6') tall 1"x 6" cedar fencing(panels butted edge-to-edge) and a two foot(2')tall cedar lattice above the 1�� x 6" panels with 2��x 4" base,panel-lattice separation rail and top cap between every concrete and/or wood post. , • All materials shall be '' quality. • • shall of oracle "A commercial quali 7. All buildings shall be constructed with lap siding and NO T-111 shall be used on the site. g p g The h H ti. .' 8. The,applicant shall install natural form evergreen conifer trees of the fol lowing.or similar species: Douglas Fir; Western Hemlock; or Grand Fir. The following schedule @ schedule shall be used: '' '60% '�'-8`in height; 30% @ 8'-10' in height; and 10% @ 10'-12' in height} The trees shall be randomly mixed and spaced 10' to 15' apart dlon g the required Cots'wald • Neighborhood existing absent and to create a continuous Nei hborhood buffer zones to fill in where existing vegetakion is abs and solid screen. , . • 9. The applicant shall pa int all bu it di n g surfaces in colors o r tones which maintain conpata b..i i ty with those currently existing within and around the area and as approved by city staff. ti 10. The applicant shall provide "rubberized plastic II trash lids for all trash containers located in the development I thank..•ou for your time in hearing the concerns of the Cots ald Neighbors. T y y y g of w �,�• s. ey have worked we encourage oh aye work s ib this solution to their concerns and as such; . you to support us in • to establish a reasonable pp y ...g Wood Village project application as formal conditions of a t 's package o requests to the approval • .....-:,...- r..nik....A:-+.....l..;e..o r.. :. ..A mr.,... .ApN.....w« ..+.1 .......iw... u... .J.la-:; M.m».-,..k...^..i....+A+....✓ ..J rIL.Y. 4 .rLx:.{r N•J.«....-i {�wfi.anrL«.xtrr^w.ux..Nm.w June 6, 1989 City Of Beaverton Tigard Planning De part men t LOB 23397 Tigard, O R 97223 Attn: Jetty Offer , Re: SDR 89-07 8 --15 89-07 D rV 9 � 85 (I aeger Pollo /XYZ Corporation) As discussed, Beaverton's transportation plan identifies that Scholls F Road (see attached) align with Davies Road to the north. Based upon that fact, the city would recommend that the following conditions be imposed on the ;above noted prcject. --- Access onto Scholls Berry Road should be limited to one access and that access be at the Southern property line. - Participation in a local improvement district for the following improvements: -construction of the Scholls Ferry realignment .; --construction of a traffic signal at the Old Scholls F e r Danaes Road intersection r,. --construction of a traffic signal at the new Neva Schol)s Ferry { Load/Davies intersection , Construction of a left t lane on Scholls Ferry Road at the driveway Sidewalk rovenen is along o rg Scholls Ferry R oad— Dedication ad Dedicationffor the �t seme of Schoils Te Davies Road. If :You have anY gUestions please feel free to contact e at 526-2 Sincerely, :1 A/i/ ( * aprs Jim :H...P n Principal Planner Go6mjh • 4755 SW Griffith Drive, p,O. Bog 4755, aeaVerton, C)R 97015, General Informatltan: (503) 526-2222 I An Equal 0ppr)rtcarilty t rnplr ye • I . • 0 McKeever/Morris, In�c.p • For The Record: Wood Village Conditions of Approval Agreement. 7:30 p.m. June 6, 1989 Between XYZ Corp. &Cotswald Neighborhood Group (Before the City of Tigard Planning Commission) My name is Paul Morris. I am a landscape architect for NIcKeeveril lorris, Inc., a planning and y' firm based in Portland, Oregon. We represent the Cotswold Neighborhood Group. On design • their behalf we speak before you this evening. . As yon have lie,arcl from testimony, the residents who live within the Cotswold neighborhood adjacent to the proposed Wood Village housing project share strong feelings of opposition towards the rapid growth of multi-family housing near their homes. Despite their general opposition, the neighbors understand the realities related to this project and • believe that it is in the best interest of the developer, the city and themselves to work toward a common solution which provides a reasonable degree of satisfaction for all affected parties. To this extent, they requested that we meet with the applicant, Mr. Bonforte and his consultants to address and resolve concerns and needs the neighbors have identified for creating a sensitive and p . p nl meetings g gr ent. • compatible development. Those meehn shave resulted in the following a een� The Cotswald Neighbors agree to withdraw their opposition to the approval of the Wood Village application contingent upon the Planning Commission's inclusion of the following list of ten items as stated in its entirety as conditions of approval. It is the full package of these items included as pP constitute this agreement: • conditions of approval which co The Conditions a A , rovil__ ncludelaao ' 1: The applicant shall provide minimum twenty foot (20') rear and fifteen foot (l5') side yard q p pp properties adjacent to the Cotswold setbacks.as landscaped buffer zones for all of the applicant's s xo ernes ad Neighbors. 2> Enclosed With la pp ed siding and peaked composition roofs shall lf be installed for all parking spaces adjacent to the Cotswold Nei g hborhood as shown on the applicant's submittal • 3: No street or outdoor area lighting shall be directed off or away from the applicant's proposed development k^ 4 A substantial buffer fence (See condition no. 6) shall be constructed along of ( ha11 alon the full length properties abutting the Cotswold. Neighborhood borh ood ..prior to any other site d enol ition or construction, Thrs fence shall be installed by hand (or other non-damaging means) so as protect the integrity of vegetation along the perimeter of the applicant's sate: The applicant shall install all r equired land sca pe planting arid irrigation as early as is practicably possible. • $12 8.W,Wtt.slu.n ton,Suite 1110 liortrttrld,ortgoit 91205 (503)2 8-135' , 0 _ • ' .+.7h:1 i4.dY ..,n.wMl:.✓.....«+.:.:...x.n.. ,-..'4 n,..„,.:;.....,.0.........:-.•:ani-..h..:....-u.-. A.x.:......-.t.....f`x1...+:i.....-M '.e:..,...wr.,uw.s.a«. t1.A.N...w:1,.r.r+..'.r!«ii+...r-...1........:i4.+..1 xW.'.4.,:.4r.wM11n. hn-.A..i w w ._.L.,r._...wf.«-.1-. .+«Y,r.r?.n C..r....._....tlM.4.v ..n..iwAiA.ntL'w-w:'r. ..wH...+iii4. . 1 5. The applicant shall establish the required buffer zones prior to any other construction on the site and these zones shall be marked, protected from all unnecessary disturbance during the construction process and selectively repaired to the minimum extent necessary to ensure long term • stabilization of this area. • 6. A "solid wood and concrete post"fence shall be constructed along the rear and side yards of the applicant's property abutting all.Cotswald Neighbors. This fence shall be located one foot(1) into the applicant's property line and built to the following specifications: 0 Twelve inch (12") square eight foot(8')tall posts at every property corner and one at the middle of each property, and four inch(4")square eight foot(8')tall pressure treated cedar posts set in a concrete footing at every other necessary location. Six foot(6')tall 1"x 6" cedar fencing(panels butted edge-to-edge) and a two foot(2')tall cedar lattice above the 1" x 6"panels with 2"x 4" base,panel-lattice separation rail and top cap \ between every concrete and/or wood post. , All materials shall be of Grade H 11 A commercial uali ir 7. All buildings shall be constructed with lap siding and NO T-111 shall be used on the site. 8. The applicant shall install "natural form" evergreen conifer trees of the following or similar species: Douglas Fir; Western Hemlock; or Grand Fir. AIN, The following schedule shall used: '- ' g, hall be ued. 60% @ 5 8 in height; 30% @ 8'-10'in height; and ' 10% @ 10'42' in height. The trees shall be randomly mixed and spaced 10' to 15' apart along the required Cotswald a Neighborhood buffer zones to fill in where existing vegetation is absent and to create a continuous and solid screen 9. The applicant shall paint all building surfaces in colors or tones which maintain cotpatability with those currently existing within and around the area and as approved by city staff. • 10. The a,plicant shall provide "rubberized plastic" trash lids for all trash containers located in the developm,bnt. I thank you for your time in hearing the concerns of the Cotswald Nei hbors. They have worked Y y g g y to establish a r solution such,.. we encourage you to support us in applying this package of requests to the Wood Village project ap plication as formal conditions of approval; q ' 1 KITTELSON 8,1 ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION lal. ,ANNING/TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 512 SW.BROADWAY•PORTLAND,OREGON 97205•(503)228-52.30•FAX(503)273-8169 wiV pl„MIM1114 May 31, 1989 JUN 1 Project No.: 236.00 Mr. Jerry Offer Tigard Community Development Department 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 , SCJBJEC: Woodside Village Apartment Complex Dear Mr Offer: 0. q , The purpose of this letter is to formally request a variance to Coinna.unity. Development Code Section 18.108.070(b) for the subject project. This section. of the Code appear to require that multiple f i msly residential developments containing between 200 and 300 g by accesses. In the original application in this dwell�n. units be served b. three or four a matter three accesses were requested, including one emergency access onto an abutting residential street in the Costwald Meadows Subdivision. The City of • igard Fire Department determined this third emergency access was unnecessary and, therefore, it • was eliminated from the application. The City Staff has informed us that, because the application now includes only two accesses, a variance i Community Development Code Section 18.108.150 • pursuant is araence ursusint �o Community � now necessary.. It is our understanding that the Notice of this matter r • ry �' p operly indicated that this variance is required and, therefore all notice requirements have q been satisfied. Community Development Code Section 18.108,15 for a variance to be granted Community • 0 allows f to this requirement if the following conditions can be demonstrated: 1) It is not possible to share access 1 n ..,«<..... ..... ...... .._....w_.. ......cwl.,:-v r«y.i..,_,.......+±-;t,.:,.+:e....;�k.,.w.w..r:.aY.�-.:.k-.,...:-xY..w:i..,,, r Mr. Jerry Offer May 31, 1989 Page 2) There are not other alternative access points on the street in question or from another street; 3) The access separation requirements cannot be met; • 4) The x e request is the n n�m' un variance required to provide • adequate access; 5) The approved access or access approved with conditions will result in a fi safe access; and 6) The visual clearance requirements of Chapter 18.102 will be met. The remainder of this letter addresses each of these conditions, and demonstrates that site-generated adequately by ed traf�.c can be ade udtel� accommodated b two ..g `� � : m access drives while still maintaining acceptable levels of traffic operations and safety. I , 1. It is not possible to share access `. . I � Ii development proposal, ;it is not possible'.. With. respect to ,the current de�velo rn.ent to share access without creating the potential for significant adverse traffic-related impacts on adjacent residential streets: Physically, such connections could be made with esting street .• hall ]Drive in the co stubs� at SW t�shbur Lane and SW 1�Iorr7 n. in tswald Meadows y ' subdivision. such _ owever a prov ision x zan of su ch ro ad connections ons would introduce the potential for a signnfcaxit amount of site-generated traffic to intrude into the abutting n eighborhood of single family residence s: �enerall y accepted planning principles discourage this type of traffic pattern: There are no other apparent and feasible options for sharing g aa ccess wit h ad j acent p roperties that could result in n am increase in � driveways available to site-generated traffic: v the total number of drive { ' we • ,:,�. ...a. .. ... '._ ..__ ..... .. .,k:., e._..._: -.a.::i'.�.+r...,...n..�,...i.,a.xei;ai,.t.«..N...n. . ,w ..._. ' .C.�;'. Mr. Jerry („i,fer May 31, 1989 Page 3; '.. 2. There are not other alternative access points Under the current situation, no other alternative access points other than. those ° identified above are available. 3. The access separation requirements cannot be met The available site frontage on SW New Scholls Ferry Road is not sufficient to allow for additional access points to be created without violating the 350 400t minimum driveway spacing standard applicable to a State Highway. i+ u 4. The access request is the minimum variance required b,• The traffic.analysis prepared in support of this application concludes that two access I . drives can accommodate all daily and peak hour site-generated traffic while still s of taraific °operations g p ar�.d. safety. Through separate a�.ntaun n acceptable levels Department sportatie�n, the City of arrigard, and the local reviews, the Oregon on �e art�nent of Zyran Fire District have not disputed these findings 5. The approved access will result in a safe a4cccss bee the response to 4) above. The traffic impact analysis t pedfical y considered a number of issues related to traffic 'safety, including the availability of adequate intersection sight t distance, the history of and potential fb)r additional vehicle accidents, . ul si h and the need for an feasibility of separate lef��tu►rn and rigbtrturn ref'tAge lanes« The an and this analysis support the co results ncl'usion that the pro�►o�aed t°�vo-driveway access of nal design will result in . a safe and efficient access system.. f,4 • I I • • • A m, • 1 Mr. Jerry Offer May 31, 1989 Page 4 6. The visual clearance requirements of Chapter 18.102 will be met See the response to 5) above. Adequate intersection sight distance can be provided at both of the proposed access drives for all approaching vehicles. ' discussion presented above and in order to clima:�ato traffic impacts of In. view of the the proposed development on the immediately adjacent Cotswald Meadows subdivision, we hereby formally request your approval of this access variance. If you have any additional comments or questions related to this matter that I might be able to answer, please do not hesitate to contact me. I , Sincerely, Arf Wayne ffittelson: Princ.pa1 I •. I ; I I , • I .., �,-.� 4�.,... I.. w..,J:'+,. arA..F:T«- .M...,.......ir.....M+,al:.al......«d.. mlF.JY:-NfI+M1A•;.— ..:.WLL.....w • n.y. . • • 9 Ja -+t. �- .. .. .ra.4en..ur lau:ml.•l«+:.�....e+.:4:.+�»� ��. A { r: GREGORY S.HATHAWAY ATTORN5Y AT LAW • GARVEY,SG}UR3ERT Ac BARER SUITE 2f,#O,121 I S,W,FIFTH AVENUE SEATTLE,WA POF2TI.AND,OREGON 97204 (206)464.3939 p • , • (503)226.3939 WASHINGTON,D 0. TELECOPIER:(503)220.0259 (202)905.7890 ;1 • • 06/05/891 10:00 f2503 684 7297 CITY OF TICARD 001 ACTIVITY REPORT ....),61fIr ley I TRANSMISSION OK TRANSACTION # CONNECTION TEL 2481952 CONNECT I CJN I D G3 START TIME 06/05 09:3J USAGE TIME 21` 33 PAGES • • • • 1 �jte , � ,�4r. 1 i 1 1 I I; • ' r • s „ 4 r • ' {1E\ MEMORA D 1 Y h µ 01; ,•{":tG-R{ ORE(3011I plll • w '1"f7; ::1'0.r•'rr'y ,offt:?►." AssIst<rrt Plarrlirar^ I I 4 ' E; ' F ICOM; t3►^±J I':3 t?1'"r^y� ti t i,1 i,1;;i. : C:rc9i,rti e(^ I , t .c3 1t•89 h r 1 r � 1 '•1 M N Y 1 � .. 11 1.Jh,l i ��u���Ir.t.1l , w��t.�cl�:r.t.l�w v;r,.i,l<�ti�n, ,�1at� �n„�.G�� t� �1a���,��,� M�,�? �.� r��,' r . . N C r. .. a Y t 1; 10.o.)tc•t;• f • y , : t` . K Inc l,t.rc:i.i►n { twt� r.et:,►^wati,orn 'bt.r,i.id i.rtc, s and ' A ��Ct t.rrri.t� ►rtul,ti,N.�f'a�ta,1, t.lt.�ttcrl►„�.�rrr�rct,� 522 iactr4°k.ci�g sraacc s. i~lnca l lent 1.;(.r7t ad jt,tst trrc�rnt will r..'t tint in a on(:.. acrr� .iaarr•ct l I I ' fol..' future rleAte!1o17r1tcrrnt, �. I I ' 9 i;.rrrl i ng s i, -- 1 "1"Nt 'aa{ {;a1,:.carnttr Ii&8 Sill:a(:11 i.1.•L0c;l a JrLLCIi,IIri i:Ai't(;l r)1"01,i.III',i.rt ar..i t.rti.1i.ty 1:)1.al'l and tat i, st;)j,1.`$ rrecxiaOr.'..•l a,urd trr.raffIc study, 21 The site is located along the cast side of New scl'tolls Ferry Road, west of Wi.l.tort 8t►r'(.ac t alt.1(.i nor4t thr of the. {ar"ca{,)f_)sc.c1 c4xttarrs i oli of SW Nlt1.r.4r'',ay r w r r,r, i . i N `,. I3c.�al cfarr"d 1 SW Nc!ti ,:►t,.lioI:1 y r�t'► t y t?o&d i an a.rt r��,,�;al under tt jurr`,i.sc.,1i,crtxt:arn of tl'le brstMcjorr state Wi.cjrrway IJ1tvx. ato:ort, 01(.4(...(:)$$ to thre si.t:( Iis ' rt►r.O11) two d rricui wr.tys ti... SW Blew echol,l , roi,,rry t oArl Tarn(.) ai'.1 ctrr»rjc. ncy 61,cc., s I;I only to 8 W Mu►r,rr r Hill I�1e..i tr , ""1 1 1 Gh, lrtrrt�r rlr x ty i �cr 1. ia►rr t rr t Cod r.t N it r ir r.t?s tFtrrrect cctrrsses; httwwcruc rrrr tht stal,arrt ,t:`I:ccdi traffic pin ran 1 City staff have ' • .+ ., that rt 1 y c'1 b 1 1 c' , ,a 1. N; � ,..t m 1 t+ c,tar7cy:i.t,rcclt�r::1 1.It�t, two dr :ttrt•�wa,y� �r c" �dt.c�t.latrc„ so �.c�r�.i as ::.art �.xc,, t>t�r.crc� ;(,E.t' I rI turn pocket Is pr,.ovidcrd on SW lk. C..'$c.ht sii,s r" (r'r^y 1 oaci kat ...1.1t niai.rn site ( • tAcc 3138 tirr':ivtwway. I 4, Storm (irr"atIrttA jca is r)rtocri.dc•d by ent::c ncli.rlrti tlntw pt:rktl,i.c, line in S,W, As1't�rt.rr y I 1,»a►nca, through the sibe to a et,titvQrr+t under 8,W, itttatl wclntnlls F rrtry Road, 'f'hcc crxi,sti,ng 2t4;rt cu1w rr,t is of;i,rnrac,10c t,riaiwca t;tati;rac:I ty I1r1d should be rrr 1;a1,aty ci 1 by at ot.f;l,uerrt of' ac.,lcAGit,tate c<trtat';,i,ty as r'c c{t,li.rr`(4d by tlnt Orre or) r8tiat 1-I gi'tway ' • Dicva si.oI'tY 5, 8iare ..1.:1',trry sct,qc4r. S'cAI"t/I{:,tr is rarfrt.■ri.d1.c1 f'rrtrrtt a .•t.:y o t:e tierr'tor7 i trunk lnc. in W 8,W, I\Ikw Scwhrt,.)11.s 1"r.r°rry Rta..4rdi, "I'l'ie public 1,alrtt: is exterrrit d ti.ilrrcaue, h the site to sort tnn >iarrt"rw1,s to thr(r south that canrn '1 be ',ser,d by thre 1.3 r in 8,W, Wilton Stl'' t t, "1"hrt4 rit::)ed fc)rr+ t xtertdi,rrc thco ;ral'tiitt ry sower al,or C;r the 8W, l\Ic Sr:11'1011{s Ferry Road bras not been dr t rrrYri.rled 1 , FNr.l;i;1\IlwI.: :l\tG OMMEl111"L WOObS1CD1 VILLAGE — r)1 18 —O7/ V 80-15/ MLP 85-07 , PAGE 9. I 4 • I a • , v • Jerry offer May 19, 1985 • • P e • f,e un i ndatxos7>~; 1, Scltr•:trt (%) sets of in and profile public i.c i.mpr"ovement construction Plans and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a Registered Professional of essx.onal. .. Caui , Engineer, detailing proposed public: improvements shall be submitted to the 1 xnee ;rc division for approval, Two (2) sets; of plait and profile Plans shall be submitted for Preliminary review , pr:tor to submittal of fi.na1. plaits STAFF CONTACT: Gary Alf son. Construction or proposed b u bi a c improvements shall not commence u .xl after the Engineering division has approved public improvement plans, "f't'tr�t act .cart w;i.l,ll, require a 100% Performance assurance or letter of commitment, an developer—engineer agreement, tNtc.. i�aYitrertt: of a permit fc_�. " 6 /N • and <:a sign i.n s tra 1,1.�•zt:i. � �t:r e+:..•L 1.is G(17 t foe, Also, tht r e k c ct.r t:i.ra n of a street o 7errrirrg permit or construction Cor1tpr1ir.,artce agreement shall occur' prior bo, • or concurrently with the issuance of approved Public improvement plaits S.IAr CONTACT: john Hagman* 8 , "f'Irtrt 1'181;(,;) t~tl:tt 1 from the nt.a•l cif' ter'.aunt rt )ii,r lhwray .•• Division, to perform wa k within a r right" o" "wa y of SW New ScholIs Ferry Road, A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering division prior to issuance of a public improvement Permit. Sl"Ar CONTACT: Cary Alf son, y. Y`` 4, The proposed privately—operated and maintained parking lost and/or roadway plan—profile and cross section details shall be provided as part of the ,f•„r.w public improvement plans, STAFF CONTACT': Gary Ai•Ps ctrl, 5, Additional.s octal r i hi:" oi=.,,:way shall be dedicated to the State along the SW New schol.is Ferry Roark frontage to increase F as+ the right—of—way to 45 feet from the centerline, STAFF CONTACT: Jon F icjiort, 6, The proposed I:rr ivz tc. y op erated and Maintained sanitary sewer and storm a• drainage system plan—profile details shall be provided as Pact of the` r '' public improvement pl.rans, STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, w The applicant wall demonstrate t::.h&, storm clr"a:t.rtia+ run—off can be • discharged to a public facility of dequate capacity, STAFF CONTACT: Grog o g' Berry. , • 8* Sanitary sewer and storm drainage d tci1s s hall b� provided cvi:ed as part � I the public improvement plans, Calculations and a topographic map of tiho. storm drainage basin and sanitary sewhrrw service area shall, be Provided as a supplement to the Public :imprc ri:merit plans. The submittal shall, include an evaluation for tho applicant to install the need o1 a Public sanitary arty „ cower" through the site and in SW Now Schol.l,s F r�r"y Road, STAF • • ,,. CONTACT Grog Sorry. 9, Evidence domonstrratinj th aiva1.abi1,ity of sanitary sewers service 'by the city of ilcavnrm ton shall be isu`rbm .ttcd as part of the public improvement plans', t3TAFr CONTACT: John Hagman,, 1.111CZNi.»LRTNG COMMENTS, WOODSIIDE VXLL6GE .,". SOR l9—O7/ 1,r 81)—i5/ l'f11...15 8°—O7 PAGE 2 1 I I I a • -.;..::a. fir:,,:. .. w.,.., r.. ..... w.., _r,._w_w.,w...t: . ' .:i... ,. ... :.•I,n•u i,t._al-..;r ... .. .r .._ 11.4 r..Y 4.. 4AH1.:-.::.. Jo rA+r^y Of f r, '.'„y Y MLay ,19, 198 P.a�,;tt JO, Public storm at•tcl sart,i.tiAt''y sc.t r^ 1i.rtos sl'It93.l• bcal irl:3ta1.i d within 1 5' c? tic?4tc rlts, Th'hC4 caasemc•.rits shal,:l be executed and rrc4.ccar•t;lcad on City stancilkt^d •-., forms amcl r eferr, triced on arncl hecorrt I:par'L of all a plaia.calalc parcel c:loods. All rrt tholes that will become publicly owned shall bo lcacrat:c d within the tr•atrelcscl way of a car^it,to(wi ry urties;s, other�wy,so fAr)v)trrotic=!di by the �rte, irtc';ct^in • Ilitiisi,orn, STAFF COl1ITACT: C3rec 130r«rr•y Y 1,1, Access to thto site 4:1t,iiii-121 construction shall, be from S, Y Now Scholis Ferry Road only, PPar kin„l of construction vehicles or of vehicles owned by those employed at the site will not be permitted in the CCctitswald neighborhood, STAFF COi111"AC'1: John 11,4a.cgirtan Y • 12• The appli.cr&nt shall provide connection of proposed buildings to the rat.iblic sanitary sc)(,..Jerrac e system. A connection permit is required to ,. ..y cor)n(.Nc".t to the exist .t-Ic, public sanitary sewer system, S"1"Ai�'C" C;Ohl''I"AC"f: 13rad roast II I Apt3t,.c)ticcl Y , Randall f , W y, C� etc i,t� t�!r' br,/ 8O•7 • .I I I , '1 I I II • I I • • I I I . I , { W , » l°»111G�tYi11r»lNixiilC C�h'iMl,,•l��, �Cr0i�.�C�r», V�,l,.l,»A�i� ,,�C)17 l`s'� C7�/ V �9 l5/ i��i� 0�' • oACIiM • . I . i \ ' . ,, I A , ' C ' ; 1 ,., Architects:P.C. ',, .., ,. - • • • Design•Surveying '-+,,, Architecture•Civil EnginePril�g•Development Services•Landscape Architecture Land Planning•Urban ,• • l''14.tiVi.,014MMIIIII MAY 31989 , may 1 1989 Jerry Offer , city of, Tigard 13125 S.W. Hall Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Woodside Village j 33 Pra eGt No. 22 . Dear Jerry: on Friday April 28, I spoke with Keith Liden regarding our desire to have our design review requEet be heard by the Planning Commission. Keith confa.rmed that this could be done, but we would • need to follow up our verbal request with request. In a ry p e.�t with a written. his absence I am sending this request to you on behalf of Tony Bonforte of the XYZ Corporation. It is our understanding that we will be put on the May 16 agenda. Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional information. ; e , 1 S�noer y► ^, � �' '4,-,•'°L.,,6,,, ' e,z, ,\ , . __,....4 L-,),,,, , v, /Je )2 f . , . C ,,A..c3a,,„ --- 't"''L' - / , , ,,, 3 . ,1 , David, L. , Bang 7,'//,,,,,A,,,C .r i ' Planner r ? ,,k �fi �� jf ry.i 1 re.„ ,4,e,,, ,'f k 6/ i DWB:tm 2233 /,,,,,,6 !' ., .t', f�, k ,,, . cc-,..:. ,'�on. 'Bonforte ,^ ,'� �' . It l " /firi "J„t( ” .d „ ? �r,3 1 , c 11 ere,,,,, 4> . • ^,^^�/.1}'^P(,[' f j�f/� ,?,,;4,1 4� . ..,, 41,.1'" 4 ' .e';,,,,,4 ',"�'v�' N�l , 'b* I 5'' - /6 ito '''''i 1 I , Lake Oswego O f fIce 1755$W,Sct)nes Ferry t:tnaci,Lake Oswego,Oregon 9/035+f 593)535.351 S Vancouver Office' 101 esI 5th Street'Vancoouver Weshingtan 98650 0(200)69wSw0357, K[rkldrld Office: 25 Cot lral Way 11305 K�rhiand,N�s hen gig n 98p33 a 1�Of)822-4448 tk4 SRS f r rrrr SODERSTROV ARCHITECTS P , C , ar D meeting notes � ARCHITECTURE $ Ivy ti!V P11NNIN° INTERIOR DESIGN , EXTERIOR RESTORATION I, unLSPACE PLANNING t Dew& pment (; Date: December 20, 1988 DAVinsODERSTRr�M 1:00 a.m. CAMERON HYDE RICHARD McBRIDE k r Location: City Tigard JON WIENER W of Ti Community Development Department TED LUNDIN City Hall DOUG WALTON MARC SEVENS 1 55. W. Hai! Blvd. M R X32 Tigard, OR 97223 DAN DANIELSON f' Phone 503/639-4171 Project: BONFORTE APARTMENTS e HWESTSTARI;STRtET PORTLAND,OREGON 97204 Job Na: 88243 50331228,8617 FAX;503/273.8584 Present: Tony Bonforte:Owner Keith S. Liden,;.Senior Planner • ry , ;, Transportation Engineer Ted ulndir Project rM r. SodE s corn Architects i. Submitted by: Ted Lundin was ion eld on the following issues: Discussion g 3 t Sewer: • o We are,downhill of T! and sewer. n Probably will Use Beaverton sewer • Gary indicated Tony should talk to Beaverton about.sewer, It will be their jurisdiction (connection • fees, monthly charges). 2 Site, . p Is in escrcaw, ' a Additional site area is still in question: 3. Stream: o Title Company - rights to property below high water mark. Tony wants to remove from title. o City is concerned about flow from;Upstream, they have calculations. Tony vant feature. Will need to verify how water Is handled, especially � on wants to Use the stream as with future develo irnent upstream 4. Traffic: • 600' increrhent between drives. ? 'ron thinks } Fer and tine 1 emergency of• ° .-.� . accesses off , .. �y � , y ks there-should be two � acres . . . � } .y ff ff Scrolls Morning Hill Drive „ P( + MEETING NOTES BONFORTE APARTMENTS December 20, 1988 Page Two r 5. Height: 45'-0” maximum 6. Application for Site: Drawing Requirements 6' Scale 1" = 30' to 1" = 50' a Reasonable sheet size (1" = 40'-0", 30" x 42" sheet) 7. Setbacks: i a Front 20'40" • Rear 20'-0" Side 10'-0" 8. o Landscape Area: 20°/. of net ea t1 r a 9. Area/lJnits , • Net Area =Gross Area less sensitive land, park dedication, R.O.W. dedication, private streets (Streets 24' wide, not Including parkin g) b Allowable Units = Net Area divided by r i 480 SF. ' 10. Capacity of Access to Site: { o W• ill`bdt minimum. than normal concrete apron, wider and lower than normal. 6 a Will have traffic engineering report. 11. Enhanced Paving: b Tony opposes this. r g City does not require it. 12. No architectural review proces • s lnvolved `• 13. Floor Plans (Zoning Submittal): For height Orientation ! r Decks o a Windows a Unit size +; 14 Parking Requirements (based on of bedrooms): bomb d i . tudi0 1 space a 1-2 Bedrooms 1-1/2 spaces a 3+ Bedrooms 2 spaces a One covered per Unit b . Includes Visitor s Handicap Parkirg . 1/60. T'Qny Wants snore. Iz 1 1 , .- ..,., ._:... .-.,.-....•,:....»_..... ...,..-:.;ti.•.,....:a,..,.....a.:.:.. ,...:,-n.. .,• ..,,,;: .......:. _ ..;:�«,w M -- ...,,1...:..: .. '..... � .�. _,.,.a.s:,..»... M. .. ,ur.....�...u.,.,..a1.:,....o-+ .....,ai.« ..:.::i,.a, • • MEETING NOTES BONFORTE APARTMENTS December 20, 1988 Page e Thr e a e ' 15. Tony says up to 10% units for handicapped (wheelchair, deaf and blind). • 16• HUD and the City have no handicapped unit requirements: • 17. No color or m r r terial requirements. material ' 18. Trees: o Code rewires tree cutting permit for over 6" caliper. q 9p p 19: 'Neighborhood Compatibility: 0 Keep buffer at east side; 20' building setback, Y • Sub ective - maintain p rivac (elevations and orientation). • j • Site Wall - can go to 81-0"; will need permit. • Internal security important (for HUD and lawsuits). 20. Ashbory Street: b Traffic engineering report will look at necessity for tieing in 135th to Scholls Ferry Road; City will look at this. 21. Daycare Center: o Tony is considering on site but will put on differeht parcel (riot under HUD) with access from apartment site: This will be a conditional use. Intention is to use for apartment project preferential basis to apartment residents). Project will,favor families. There will be a large number of 3 bedroom units, 2/3 family units, and 1/3 singles' units. 22. We are in Beaverton School District and Tualatin Valley Recreation District. 23. Neighborhood Planning Organization will review the project. 24. Gene Eirchell of Washington County will be fire marshal. 25: Administrative Decisions: 4-5 weeks long • 26. Hearing's officer Meets each 2nd and 4th Thursday of the month: 27. New zoning code will be available In l ebruary. Keith can be called with any questions. 28. Main issues: • Traffic d Drainage • • Sewer • 29. HUD is asking for zoning clearance for this project from the City for the number of units: 80. No wet lands are involved, • cc: Those present have Soderstrorn • .4 , t, ' •. Mro n drx 4 I'. t , ..},r,1.. . .. ... ...,......, ..«.I,. ,a..,xn. .,.. .. ,.,.-., i. ..;.a-.:_..,w:_+..4.-.l,o.,,.. ._+.a.,....r.:w ,,...., .».I,., u„1-.t:,.....t..,a.w..,. ,+A... :.lae,J.,...,.w..,..,,..-„w.. ..m-,..,,.-t.,...•1..:.. . r, , b Ct i r ,w I '%'°'41)' "''' 1. • r tln ytii May 2, 1989 To: Je`vcy O64e>r. Fxam: NPO t7 RE: W as d�,c.de. V.&a.ge. Apatr✓tnievc. (Vi,e,„eagen Con mun., c.e S) The ,,ab e0.:t apa>rtmevi,t eam 2ex ha>s beer?, nev, owed by,the menibehh o the. NPO wLth the ,6 a.2.eowif,tg ne>s u.e fps , 1. On �sugge)s.�`.c.at' o .the NPO, the F.Lne Ma>Usha.2 nev, ewed the negcwtemeh. 6eh, a 6 ce ae.eeis�s awty Mahvc�ivtg H ., V1Aue Th • ways deemed artivtieeez�sa ry due. to y I adequate aee.e.z s to both .the 'ubd,e,v,L6,Go 06 hohia, and the apccAtmevrt c.amp.2ex. A , 2. A gnaup o ppito Lma tet y 20 -3 0 hameawv?e�us a ,tevcded van Ap>z,AI 19 mee t.ng . ' p v a a'£a teh. isabmLtted ' �a t�atic.e. caneeJz�c arch �h�us na 'eel A�ached ,us a. e. y�y � 4 ec)rtAide�^�a t`avi., the memb enis 06 the NPO` by NPO an nev.t;ew. .A �e>c y �hern �a �he v abed to give., -the ep.dcon6 erne .t 0,6 the NPO to the £e eh. a.vtd 4Unwa.d -U . an , cutthe/ e.on LdeecatLovz� I PI' .lameh B, ea�t2 Pa#7 chr.,ch , ; I . . . I , I , t 1 N `h sr s ' April 19, 1.'489 Keith Liden, Senior Planner City of Tigard City Hail Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: WOODSIDE VILLAGE APPLICATION Dear mr.. Li.den_ The residents of Cotswold sir®n 1 Y o Ppaee the application for the apartment g planned Cotswold `Iv which was filed last week apartment v�.11a e lann,ed .for Cotsw�. more apartments artments to be built in the area is extremely detri- mental to our . n . r han�e values, and is in direct conflict with the information we Were equal or greater value°t when given p we Purchased ourohomes, not the impact an additional 290 • P p ', three- stor°y apartments would have on the quality of life in o ur neigh- ;' borhood„ y by apartments a few feet from are already surrounded b about 500 a our Property We ai on the north and south and those will soon be joined by over 70 more approved in the Sunflower Apartments lines in p and several hundred the rn project. When a city allows the` p � Y, n s more in the �rabho t°building down" 'of an area i zoned for R-25, such as ours was, and, addditonall y, allows a . home show to lure prospective purchasers to the area it seems the, city • � � y any con- the city o should make an exclusion to the addition of an further apartment ..con struction in an area which is already bearing the burden of ' th a �y f Tigard's R-25 apartment zoning. � .. is It appears the single-family residential pat map on file with the city (where we were told we must check information, cit records must heck for accurate by the Cit y of Tigard Hearin g s Officer, Beth Nasni) was there only as a smokescreen, over 50,000 people Paid $5.00 each to attend the 1987 Street of Affordable Homes, and saw the plat maps posted_ in garages, the van at one end of the show street bearing a large e poster with an arrow pointing to s d IV anti' stating the future development purposes, and the large wooden sign showing the single-family lots. This barrage of visual docu-- thethomenshow�supplemented the �tiani�ureders and realtors represented iri. recent . .. •s have also been y, ;� Purchasers mislead when they have contacted the city, which further complicates this situation„ municipality, as `a governing body, should protect tights of all its residents, not just those of developers, . corporations,ion ri at i A �ilX ► � � r large land-owners or long-term residents. BY creating this urban growth area, 1and�bwne . and sponsoring a home show, you eXtended a bond (.^f good faith which yet now bodes ill for the City of Tigard to foster a reputationoofrthis nature. a P ' WOODSIDE VILLAGE APPLICATION . . Page 2 As well as stating herein our total opposition to the application, we have prepared a list of changes we feel are necessary in the appli.ca- txon. We well realize the tight time frame we are allowed in voicing both our opposition to any application for this apartment development, and the need to quickly register any changes we would like to see, requires us to both object and request conformances at the same time, A• but we want to have these on the public record. . I have talked at length to , g the residents of Cotswald their concerns and objections are mine. With that in mind I present the A following owing list of modifications requested b the Cotswald Neighborhood Village pplication: 1 . Instead of proposing a new property line set, 15 ' back on the Schoils Ferry side, leave the existing property line an place, allowing the entire project to set back an additional 15 ' from Cotswald III. 2. Provide a 20' setback (instead of 101 ) .0n the property paralleling Ashbury Lane 3. Eliminate the daycare site. This area is already saturated. Grabhorn has a daycare site planned and Kindercare and Children's Learning World on 125th can hold 85 more children. Daybridge Daycare is only • slightly further away more children. and can enroll 25 �aor With 4 daycares within a mile there seems little need for another. This land should instead be used for parking vehicles in Garages 5-15 (45 cars) and carports :1 0- 25 (22 cars) to place those unsightly rows of structures away from Cotswald III. • 4. Put garages in of open en parkirg and carports (open Parking Sc, • 9c, 8s, 7 s, 12c, 3c, Sc, 9s, and ids � 6g ca rs, and carports 16 and total p tai of 91 cars) which would, then 'be completely ,,. covered nearestCbtswald III. The street and entrance into these garages should also be on the apartment (West) side. Repropose the flood lighting for our a ppro- val after the site plan is redone. and angle p to the three Building #8 Type E ar 5; Put Bid Type A where t are located, buildings... face of the bull, Cotswald III. There should . p _story i be no decks or u' per -stor. window t��.ndewrless end buildings fay facing Cotswald III. 6 Angle buildings in location of .Building 9--,12 so the windowless dowaess en , of the buildings faces Cotswald /II. I , rx ('f w001)SIDE VILLAGE APPLICATION page 3 7. Relocate the potentially noisy recreation facilities along Schoils Ferry Road the street noise will not be as noticeable to the y oad where th users as it would be to the residents of any apartments along Schoils. 8 . Place a 10:00 P.M. curfew on the use of f all .recreation facilities. - 9. Replace. the Lombardy Poplars along the east property line with mature Canadian Hemlock. They are evergreen versus deciduous, which will provide better year round privacy, and less cleanup. 10. In the buffer cone on the north and west side of the property between ' . ld III and the apartments: - All buffer zone work (landscaping, walls, trees, etc. ) must be completed to Cotswald satisfaction before construction of the Woodside Village begins At a minimum of 40° from the property line, construct a 10' high berm (using as a base height the land height ht be hind 11721 SW Wilton) - On top of the berm construct a 6' real used brick Wall to be main- . by Woodside village with y g a locked brick wall at Morning Hill Drive for emergency iron gate s the .* J emergency fire access (if such is deemed necessary) - 10' to the east of the brick wall plant Canadian Hemlock 10' apart - Plant 6' arborvitae l " on center, 2 ' west and north of property lane along fence/property line on the Cotswald III side No dogs or cats allowed in the apartments: 12 . No garage work done g in the Woodside Village. ' p . Owner- sc name telephone manager's name ' telephone designated Wilton property and Neighbor- . e 1 . �e arXd t�l 3 number given to desi 4 owners aid the , hood Watch captains, 14. -Approved o... Y Y ems on all adjoining single family ytal.�. UT�-A roVedry se�,�urit S st residences on Wilton Avenue (3, homes) and Ashbury Lane (3 homes) lb. Etteriori ry Cedar 6" Siding (Clapboard,) Nn T-11 I , .,..,.a.... ..a'. ..........ry .,....n.. ..,..«v ........m ...,... ,«.....r r.. .... .......Ati ry .. .. ,....... .. .... ,......._.. ...,..., .........,..e. .,..r...o-. ,. ....«... .r,.,.. ., r... , a .., r •01 11 I . WOODSIDE VILLAGE APPLICATIOza Page 3 - Real used, brick on ends of buildings facing Cotswald - Earthtone paint in a single color throughout the Woodside Village (Light to Medium Gray or Light Brown) - Cedar Shakes or single color tile roofs in Light Gray or, Light Brown Tile (saline as those on the Meadow Creek Apartments off. S.W. North Dakota) 15. During the construction phase: - No construction before 8:00 A.M. after 5 :00 P.M. , or on weekends -- No music playing during construction , w - No animals brought to the site -- No constrrcri,en traffic on Morning Hill or Ashbury. No access at all through Cotswald during construction, and no parking in CotsWvald. Access only through the Scholls Ferry Road entrances. e' er Brenda /. i,1pin On behalf of the Cotswald Neighborhoods • cO: NPQ *? R , ... . .»«..,._.. .:... . .a.. ..,.... . ...:, .r..::....:..:. a.....,-..._ ...:..7. u,.n.. ._..,....u..Xa.., «......i... .LL. a tM—.. v+J JA:.A .. !\... k,A.i APR 2 6 1989 SST FOR COMMENTS l� 1f dr TO: At""V A I1. 11r -V I #4 DATE: Aria 20 1989 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SDR 89-07 / V 89-15 ,/ I4DLP 89-07 XRDEGER-POLLOCK/XYZ CORPORATION For 1) Site Development Review approval ,to allow a (200-.unit) multi-family (200 unit . residential development and associated improvements on a 15.89 acre } parcel; 2) a Vlriance from the required setback of, 50 feet from the centerline of Scholla Ferry Road. The requested setback is 45 feet from f, centerline; and 3) a Lot Line Adjustment of WCTM 1S1 33CC, tax lot 600 and Ii ISI 33CD, tax lot 200 from 2:00 acres and 14.28 acres respectively to 1.002 acres and 14.59 5 acres, a total of approximately 15.5 acres excluding a .304 acre right-of-way dedication, ZONE: R.-25 ` (Residential, 25 units/acre). LOCATION: 2000 feet south of Old Scholls Ferry Rd. (WCTM ISI 33CC, tax lot 600 and 1S1 33CC ' tax lot 200) n H . Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for y our review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other l, information available to our staff, a report and recommendation Will be and a decision Prepared `sion wil.l be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by 1� 19E9. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If lrc+u are unable to respond by the above date.;; please ' phone comments�in writing as soon as possible. If our comments and confirm our contact noted below p Ie Department, any questions regarding this matter,' contact the Tigard Planning D • contact p• ,- O Box 23397i 13.125 'SW Hail Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 PHONE: 639--4171 ' ' STAFF CONTACT: T: �'erry Offer PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: !! We have reviewed the proposal, and have no objections to it. Please contact _ of our office- Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments:" • Name of Person Cort1menitin : w Phone Nu rihaer: "7.7t.:••, y w ' bkm/SbR59-07.B CM •r I • 4 m • � v RAT FOR Cis TO: 4 , 1 (t l ,,..) DATE: A•ril 20 1989_A,_ FROM. Tigard Planning Department RE: SDR 89-07 / V 89-15 / MLP 89-07 1KRUEGER-POLLOCK/XYZ OORPORATIoN For 1) Site Development Review approval to allow a (200-unit) multi-family residential development and associated improvements on a 15.89 acre parcel; the required� requi setback of 50 feet from the arced,, 2) a Variance from centerline of ScholIs Ferry Road. The requested setback is 45 feet from centerline; and 3) a Lot Line Adjustment of WCTM 1S1 33CC, tax lot 600 and 1S1 33CD, tax let 200 from 2.00 acres and 14.28 acres respectively to 1.002 acres and 14.59 acres, a total of approximately 15.5 acres excluding a .304 acre right-of-way dedication. ZONE: R�-25 (Residential, 25 . acre Y ( units/acre). LOCATION: 2000 feet south of Old Scholla Ferry Rd., (1CTM 181 33CC, tak lot. 600 and. 1S1 33CC, tax lot 200) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for` your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation - will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If ou wish t wish p p y �r►ment on this applicatimn, we need your ante by M��., to co 1989. you ma y use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to Tf.':.you return your comments. are unable to respond by the above datey please hone the staff contact noted below with your!' comments and confirm your i p comments in writing as soon as possible.ed bPlo in writing p le. If you have any questions regarding 1 . , Tigard Planning Department, PO Co this matter, contact the ,Ti a Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Jerry..Offer PLEA. CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. , P ,r_,,._: Please contact of our office. � n Please refer to the enclosed letters written comments: pp • Name of person.Cotsitienting: y / 4 —4ECFItED rdiNNi Phone Number: : 6 bkrrt/SDRe9-07:b ei '4 a R 2 r 118 • n. r , w .L. -.. ,.A, .,....i. w. ....... .....:1...G..» :-.wJ...J N.. .,+N 1. ...-. .nL...., .-r.S i:+,:4...x..,w-,•xwa..- ...-eM1SaM.,+-W,..r -1�.:.1... .r+iJ:;, .'MM ... r • PEQUBST' F6 R S TO: A\e DATE Aprils 2�0. 1989 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SDR 89-07 I V 89-15 / MLP 89-07 KRUEGER-POLLOCK/XYZ CORPORATION For 1) Site Development Review approval to allow a (200-unit) multi-family i-faaAl Y 'r 4 a 15.89 acre development associated improvements on residential develo ent , and a parcel. 2) a Variance from the required setback of 50 feet from the centerline of Scholia Ferry Road. The requested setback is 45 feet, from centerline; and 3) a Lot Line Adjustment of WCTM 1S1 33CC, tax lot 600 and .:, acres respectively to ,. . 151 '33CI3, tax lot 200 from 2.00 acres and 14.28 acr 1.002 acres and 14.59 acres, a total of approxiiiately 15.5 acres excluding ". a .304 acre right-of-way dedication. ZONE': R:--25 (Residential, 25 ) Ferry `Rd.,(WCTM rxn �s,dacre . LUCI�,T�C�7N. 2000 feet south.of Old �chol]:a is1 33CC, tat lot 6013 and 181 33CC, tax lot 200) eview. From statement for your r a ,Attached a.s the Site Plan and appla�ca.nt s y information Supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. prepared P If you wish to comment on this application, we need your Brats by ___16, , 1989.. You may use the', space provided below ,or attach a separate letter to h return your comments. IIf, yo-,u @,,re unable to res nd _1?V the Shove date, please �'�ble. If. you have any questions your phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm , g PO Box 23397, 13125 SW comments in writing as soon as posy' a. y y Q gardi: • 9 Planning Department, SW this matter, contact the. Tigard 1P,I.ann�.n Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT CONTACT: erry Cf der , PLEASE OWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: E CHECK THE FOLLOWING We have reviews p po and objections to it . reviewed the ro dal ,and have no ob'ect�on ce Please Contact o f our o f ._ i Please refer to the enclosed letter. • written comment �' Wra.tt coN Sc51LIbATEC?ARE AND ilESC:U 47v((3),1 Washington CciUntj/!rite District No,I . y a .et/e' .� 7Utaiati t Fire District a t?aparttnenE ,. » 4 Q n �Ccitnmenta.n g ,, Name of Person -,--r=--- ' ' '°'' ]Pholne EEaimber, b1+91f' ivr11�_ rIRE MARSHALS gnOFFICE]{ DRS9-07 $EtM kng CI vd•t tl4b-Soh,∎∎ d Ac fAfhe6 Cdr my iitin C TUWdSn Gene Oirefilit beputy Fire Marshal/P1Mhs Examiner , (503)526.2503 4765 s W.Gtiiilih brie a t7 Dina 471M . y _ APR 27 1989 REQUEST roR COMMENTS • w . . To: / c � 2 x 98A i FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SDR '89-07 / V 89-15 / MLP 89-07 KRUEGER--POLLOC ,/XYZ CORPORATION For 1) `' .. Site Development Review approval to allow a (200-unit) multi-family residential development and associated improvements on a 15.89 are e • Parcel; 2) a variance from the required setback of 50 feet from the , centerline o f Scholls Perry Road. The requested Setback is 45 feet from °. centerline; and 3) a Lot Line Adjustment<of WCTM 1S1 33C'C, tax lot 600 and II 181 33CD, tax lot 200 from 2.00 acres and 14928 acres respectively to 1.002 area and 14.59 acres, a total of approximately 15.5 acres excluding a • a .304 acre right-of-way dedication. ZOlEs R-25 (Residential, 25 F' unnits/acre) . LOCATION: 2000 feet south of Old Scholls Ferry Rd.,(t CTM 161 33CC, tax lot 600 and 1s1 33CC, tax lot 200) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. Froxx! ' pp n and from other • information supplied by various departments and a recorrpm information available our staff,P a report and - information � �the proposal endati.on Will be I and a decision will be rend t • prepared p � the near future. ' you wish to comment on this application, we ® our I is by Fi_43r ,1• y y p attach p letter to , I�' o PP �!' 1'369 a You ma use the space Provided below or attacYn' a separate • return your comments. I f yu ax•c una ble to respon F above date. please staff contact noted below with our comments s and confirm your comments in writing n phone the . ruin as soon as possible.with you have any questions regarding this matter- contact the Tigard Planning... Department, PO Box 23397, 131 g P y 9' this 13125 SW n, Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE': 639-41719 STAFF COXNITACT. ,Jerry Offer ' ; ' PLEA" CHECK TUE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have nog objections to it. ° Please contact of our office. )' . Please refer to the enclosed letter. ... Written Comments: , 1 f • 1 P J. 1 f , Name of P erscfn Commenting: ,..,6 Phone number: '' :,, G � s Mi , ••.. � 4, s„b, ,r. / r � ::,','4,4::',,:, 4 4, 5.''' y Yom''=41' T TOR cOMMEN ra ., :.:;.' :i. ): +At...°,„., . 1. . . ,... ( M.,1,' artTg a { . ... ��-I_-,.n...,.,, . ,...�..�,...d... • : PROHt Tigard Planning ng Dept rta i t t 8 R 89-07 / IF 89.15 / MLP 89-07 KRUE iE'H- K/XYZ CORPORATION par 1) site Development Review approval to allow a (200muanit) Multi-f ily residential development and Associated improvements on a 15.89 acre Parcel; 2) a Variance from thaaa required d s tbaOk Of 80 feet from that centerline of Alchclla rerry Road. The requested setback is 45 goat from centerline; and 3) a Lot Line Adjustment of WOTH 181 33CC, tax lot 600 and 181 3 3CD a tam lot 200 from 2.00 acres and 14.28 agree reePOOtively to 1.002 acres and 14.59 acres*es a total of a pprOx Matel.y 15.5 acres excluding • a 3O4 acre right-of-way da dtcattona ZON R-25 (Residential, 25 • units/acre). ATION% 2000 feet mouth of Old Scholia' FarrY T to a(W •, • 181 33CC1 tam ;Let 600 and 181 33CC, tames lot 200) ' Attapae hed is the site Plan ant pp1ic an a statement for your review. Prom information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information' . nvailable to our staff, a report and teo omtsndation will bed Prepared aanci a dleci itoro will be ra ncler.d on the proposal in the or future, 1> yo wish to comment on this application, your comments by v,; ,, • 19 You may uee the apace provided ed below or attach separate latter to . ' return your comMents. If you are unable to,res n4 t" the a Ve date, please a phc n* the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing ea soon a pcetoi l a I f you have any questions r arding this matter., contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 213970 1312 5 5 .' Nall Blvd.* Tigia rd* OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. sTArr 4 N1"AAT t ray CD air , .'','^ ' PEE CHECK THE FOLLOW12 1 ITEMS THAT APPLY: •' We have `e ie Ted the propoea1 And have rio ob j ectiaano to it. ,. i. • Please contact of our office. Please ref,. , to the anc ioead, 1ett; r _Written Comments r /0) 4 ,,,.. n , I a � , c ` ii :.','. j r/ r li.e....._4 .. / ) ;, , ,"( ,,,,, . .. i . �' w�rmw nmaaapww� L� M— wlaer � rJ- y / L 7 Y , r , , . , ..:,,..,: - !, ,,,.,. . ,, ... .: 4. .,...: : ,,,,„ ,'4, , f ,' ' . .i / ; .;Ai ' . ,'' eifrd ..eV fr .,. 'Oe'' 1,' n ' „ ..i , T • a� game f Fer an mm tta0101111*010100e7*/ ,ho81 G {{ 1! �kna/',s�7 t 'W- `7*•u�344'b .' ' / ' `�?+"�i .a.. '1 i 1 " r1 I yo .,J ; DE. . Afw E DO e:{f I • to d °9' .# 18S°9LE 2218:L N `1 1 r i C 'IsrH H6 101 alga I a«C[1 i,1 t tT 5S r-2.16- idH , � 1 IS: • I • .. r......__ a-«-.•....+,.,.,:w f., e•. ,..r a..r.y.: ...............:.. .v ' -.. ..-..... ....,..._._..,, __.s .......,n,.....a.. H..a_,w.... ✓,......w..0 ». aa.,l...,x .... ...-.•. .k...r,.n iU.J d.n....,...«.a, ...w-w....-.,.n..�.4.«•.... ..».1 nom.. ik .,,,, H I I; REQUEST POI( COMOOITS' 1 / ii (. , Tt�s l /'' l� l•.k :*L ± DATE. ,,,aril 2C1r. 1.985 � . FROM: Ti gard Planning Department Sit SIR 89-07 / V 89-15 / ?!LP 89-07 KRUEGER-POLLCCK/XYZ CORPORATION For 1) Site Development Review approval to allow a (200-unit) multi-family residential development and associated improvements on a 15.89 acre ' Parcel; , ce from the re, arcel° � a Variance required setback of 50 feet from the ,, centerline of Scholl Ferry requested 45 feet from cen � e'er Road. The re ested setback, �,s ; 3) Lot j WCTM and �� centerl�Yne, and 3 a Lotr Line Adjustment of WCTI� 1S1 3300, tax lot 6QC3 an 81 33CD, tax lot acres respectively t i . "4g from 2.OA acres and 14.28 a � to 1,0®2 acres and 14.59 . ' 7 approximately 15.5 acres excluding acres, a total of a roxixnatel 15. a .304 acre right-of-way dedication. ZONE: R-25 (Residential, 25 II units/acre). LOCATION: 2000 feet south of Old Scholia Ferry Rd.,(WCTM l 1s1 33CC, tax lot 600 and 181 33CC, tax lot 200) Attached is the Site Plan and a pplicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be " ` be rendered on the proposal future.:. . . and a decision will b your in by May 3. prepared wish to comment on this application, we need yal �.n the y D P P" P' P If You w�.s 1989, You may Use the space Provided below or attach a separate letter to j• ' return your comments. If -ypu are unable to respond by the abovq date, please phone the staff in contact Y -• d below Your is and confirm your commentsn writingas soonoaspossible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW ? . . Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-41714 • d. STAFF CONTACT: Jerry_ Offer PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: XX We have reviewed the _ proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office, Please refer to the enclosed letter. b „ XX Written Comtnents: We do need more detailed information on the ', water plans I ; r Name of Person Commenting: - ,.. - � •" Phone Number: . . .::l "�' John P„ Hiller` bkm/SbR89- 107.EKr+I a • 4 .,. Y, 1 ♦. a rw G...:...w.. .n. n,......w.a m .. nw,.....F..-+..,.........r.---,.. , i o� ek ( �0 89 , Tiy7°e 20 1989 ._.._, DATE. A•ri� t • FROM: Tigard Planning Department l: RE: SIR 89-07 I V 89-15 I MLP 89-07 KRUEOER--POLLOCI(/XYz CORPORATION For 1) 1 Site Development Review approval to allow a (200-unit) multi-fami1y p. residential development and asr�ooiated improvements on a 15.89 acre parcel; 2) a Variance from the required setback of 50 feet from the centerline of Scholia Ferry Road. The requested setback is 45 feet from centerline; and 3) a Lot Line Adjustment of WCTM isi 33CC, tax lot 600 and 1.51 33CD, tax lot 200 from 2.00 acres and 14.28 acres respectiv'elY to �' � ;; .; 1„002 acres and 14.59 acres, a total of approximately 15.5 acres excluding a .304 acre right-of-way dedication. ZONE: R-25 (Residen'tial, 25 j' j units/acre). LOCATION: 2000 feet south' of Old Scho1ls Ferry'Rd-,(WCTM 151 33CC, tax lot 600 and 131 33CC, tax lot 200) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From pp by p agencies from other ” " will be i�. to and recommendation � informata.ora available i.� our staff, a report nd f information supplied b various departments s an a enca. r prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal, in the near fntured ? If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by May 10 1989. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to , return your comments. 1 you ar_e unable the above date, please ' ret :..,_... a3�ond•...�'v t p, P below with r your comments and confirm your e Y comments in staff soon oasd possible. If you have any questions regarding matter,- this " Tigard SW Planning Department, P© Box 23397, 13125 S i . . Hall Blvd, Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639-4171. .I STAFF CONTACT: JerryOffer pLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APP. Y tl -: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to its' Please contact of our office Please refer to the enclosed letter. ,r ;, Written Colments � y w 1 I: Name of Person GoiYimenting �.� .'"' ' I . Phone Number: blrs/SDR89-07.Bit •. f • .., h,..G PROPOSAL;,DESCRIPTION ' FILE X O: 4D + 'i' "b'7� 1,� --f r�� 'e9~d P�7 NO. 7 . ,.FILE'7"ZTL.E: i'1'1l�I :s'gf V 111(4.fr r`Jb4)1466 CHAIRPERSON:.. 1 1, Y GHAIRPER.aON; e pa t,t,•oce ,(0�A E C ,..---,--d X PHONE• t,o, -0( 40 . P RA-7/ort) C,i Pf L/4r170() APPLICANT: >( tG OWNER: ir►gl "Se->``I /C�' 'GE/2 e 1"�,ONN'AGt'h e.` j��, UCt<„, i , ' (-"biUY Th0,01,oz ` ') 102-(1 SU) 3# i f L(( (3GU ) s�tr7 47.G ; /Uz.e o �w 6-gge: r ureC-t-'b , 1.140b t” a,l�r't:4rv6, o(Z ! ?at 1' . " � REQUEST: F'7(' 51Z 'bg eLOt'rn ?rt7 PgUlfPO PetZ0 0A*4: 7U ✓EGU✓� 4�GQ _"c�ru1 1 411,11?% 04 /G 1� S r b1= u72',16 `tN 621 O C" /�' 5r,l'/541C't., [ �'"(1 ., r ' o1- �-7.: Leo.✓. ✓edru7 7,1g. ciew7 ,eL//G 6, 0/= . 'c°/d/C S ra,,,1✓ . - .. . fie,.7"I6f)C'1t' 16 5--,c-'"g.-(- � Oil c,u re ) 4.4 N 7- oO F!.'-(5 '1 z..�a!4 4wAs, , , M,t �e r 7 rV 33 cam'a.. i41(Go.'* Cvto Aiub IS/ „ i`r/.1: 1-6'( '0 - 2/� f t /6/.2Y ce4?gS `5 e'e7/a e l,' '1' /.00 4- l/u� ��-/ 5”' ✓ 0�r 4i cZ I 'i '7-~'/' ? erVF9 y' 'P ,1/C,47/4/) 1 tiry ZONE: •. pz; "" ," ;1 , t∎o.` ;e11 , / `r,,,4,„ 4 r. • LOCATION 2-006' 3Ot-l"1'/f o 06th Sd/f-1546 ? V e'b 8'~t '': ✓ -1= - ,'d ' • &t✓(—rm 151 3. Cc. -7-1 .*6,O6 AA(b ,s( 33' C b -7-4, AA-Z4-AC) CHECK ALL WHICH APPLY , 4�' STAFF DECISION PLANNING CO1XSSTON/OATE OF HARING: TIME!HEARINGS OFFICER /DATE OF HEARING: TIME CITY COUNCIL /DATE OF HEARING: TIME: j. . VREQUEST FOR COMMENTS (SEE 'ATTACHED NOTIFICATION LIT)( 'f 'b q/41) I DATE COMMENTS ARE DUE BACK: _"_ � 1 1; CONTACT PERSON (staff): . r '& , :. ATTACHMENTS TO BE DISTRIBUTE(° WITH REQUEST FOR COMMENTS: " • .. r VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPING PLAN V ARCHITECTURAL PLAN . - SITE ARCE�JC1'E , r � NARRATIVE __`, SITE PLAN , L M.`. �. PREPARE FOR PLANNER APPROVAL E LETTER ACCEPTANCE OF APPLICATION (Date accepted _ I,` • ADVERTISEMENT FOR R OF ACraEP`i"A T.1`, T.T s OREGONIAIlI `, �. � . (Date) (cute 2rd heari g) (Date) PUBLIC HEARTH G NOTICE TO SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS • { Date to be mailed', ; L NOTICE TO DLCD wz Cli what atta+chi not e • 1 e, w I, , 1d v [l PtAp}Cr�t.SSAi �b.tl MM . 1', y.`�f I ��P'GE�'MO•�PESOA�y� `r . ' d 11A _ f'•1 I'i,'r. ,W:4„LH+4WRJLE7 I=w dP.1_+t .�_.lir �_ ., _ j 1.4 I�� C L4!a1�4, l;, • �r..w...�e / B 6 ■ ,/ l Y �w' � ji �, yA a` fi b/ ` ; l ` f r I, - ; t eZ, x a � I1u�'x /4t/P N".pDww mP.�� / h f '' ,,. I (CIF kPd}CI•_. ,7 �' , bel7n a6• /v ,d`/1,(`,y" ✓�`'./ I t c.,. r' i I' ,, "I1+1� �•�eri J: l' t� ,. .'. W �r_rJx� Fe Itluoue• i r �J1� d , ,.. . • ...: ' � a .J t i. .�. to oo+n•` ir 1 I Y v 1 taw► ,x r .r,. / 1. .1rA` , �rl�" 'xft{L{{pr�tjt'�,Ii!°'' i'r1 I d 4 I EtIi>r�I 1 { ' h i?'�, '�s " 6 -,,, PP., ,,,,,,, Q4.; � a 1 4 I igil • t+ r 1 �� / �Y `c / i, I ( 4 $i a h / un 1111il 1 1+ j r j7 � ( hill 1 y r t tl j , i 1 d 1�l '. yy 1tkfl •'r ill s 'F N, h,, +,iP Intt; 11 U �_.� i ,� qY "`{ I L;J na a NOR?'N „Il DTI 1 b Ci z , , } 1 w" $ Gr 0 t1,30 gt,g^axe 5 J rogrt 1 () �u d i P} t P 1�I1 g 1 1 I f,7 $'it ivi �� 1 _ 1 1 ,•'' ' , ir Illi ri�, dt� � tl • f 11 � d�D11 1 � l I I .R " I .i J ,'1%' .i iii iy" iirli' .' i•/1/ f. 1 ..L.1 i d q a xre sa an_"r a axaw' 1 f1 1 . .. , , ii L`2 N • r 1 i » r f, ,_,,i, )1 Amp,r,x �a a-n 0.4t, rl 4 a itl,' b a r..n �,, I ! P ,rl Yrly X16' r: Gt 14 ii , d ; fI ,, 1; 1 , t ",�-•°' ; $. iii !l} ii 'at6 'u -" �. 1 g $ 1" Y N r llaPN. i' jj ,rr+ :III A 6 $$ a " • ). . 1'I I Fr.,M.f .., ■YMW+'1 Sp en! 1� iWP L y 0E !WM1.t t »1' ', r Ndj . yklf '`�,�'11w}•° µ. " ^r'Ciirrx:C"'�^rr..�.�yri.' 'Ln.+r..:r.., A � / �r t"+ ._,.,„':,,,,T•.••'u ACp,,,,Ptt7E*iwP I, 5 law. 1TMw 1' 'It r. • ,• rataaae R XX • 1.71:SIGN Rt-VIEW SUBMISSION—APRIL 101 1989 _ I 1 1'10 to 00 8 L 1.I,L Glia 1?1,, ? I„) 1111 I" v 161U111•PrrI tt1fp1)eivtv}nluittI9lill',"� •' 1 � � " NfKar 7Tgrud.Clrguu I � "�, i t. . � 6 9 " 1 r4�Canu}ui 4 `' r _ . . • r 'eC ore � D , rchil t � �.• ., 11 v r �j' n nn r�j •. �, .engineering �� J C�� .�..fZl �� _ ��J��UVIJ O �I J �� Development Services •• �; Landscape Architecture• Land Planning U4rherl Design � cL� I � o INCORPORATED Surveying E I, • d. ARC:,HITECTS,',,P:C ) 17355 5.W Booties f=erry Rd,Lake Oswego,019 97035 (503)535.3618 APR 1 8 1989 I, 101 E 8th Street,Vancouver,WA 98660 (206)696-0357 11058 Main Street 11215,Bellevue,WA 98004 (206)455-5340 • DATE JOf31�0. Jerry ()fifer April l,', 1989 223341 ,• RE; pp. Su lemnental Submittal for C�7' OF T ' � TIGARD ' a 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Woodside Village Tigard, OR 97223 • . . NSMITT'AL l BY: Mall❑ Courier Will Call❑ TRANSMITTAL GENTLEMEN: p following items: ' WE ARE SE N DING YOU l�Attacned ❑Under separate cover via the 0 Shop drawings 0 Prints 0 Plans ❑Samples 0 Specifications 0 Copy of letter 0 Change order 0 ._ _- THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: 0 For approval I For your use E, As requested • 0 For review and comment • COPIES PAGE# w __ DESCRIPTION ' 6 Narrative for Woodside Village D n R..yiet Deeds for each of the two parcels ..Ali. .. EEMA This information was requested by staf aid on Fridqy 4. 14.-89. t ' • ap esl • Yaliow �rl In�tnr : irtk Proje t Flle µ ilk SIGN Et): . ,, emu► , Gold Nunerio rii e David Bentz . ,, if enclpsures ate hot ss rioted,n0Yify us at brit,: r:• , • l , I. " rchitecture �1E 't c=,R 0J6 J RANNJIJI`!U O ll L AL, I Development Services Landscape Architecture 4°� n Lpnd Planning ( Urban Design N C O R P O R A T F D Surveying • •'.: ARCHITECTS, P,c , : -,, 17355 S.W.Bopnes Perry Rd.,Lake C gwego,OR 97035 (503)635-3618 • 101 S 8th Street,'Vancouver,WA 98,50 (206)695-0357 . 11058 MaIn Street 0215,13ellevue,V(A 98004 (206)455-5340 DATE J013 NO. , e April 10, 1989 TO: it lid�. 9 Se»c�r Plax e� 2233.1 Planning^Department Woodside Village •• CITY OF TIGARD Design Review Subdivision If ' 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 • = i TRANSMITTAL BY: Mall 0 Courier ) Will Call it GEN 1"i_EMEN • , P Attached 0 Under separate cover via �.— following item WE ARE SENDING YOU 0 p a the f items: 0 Shop drawings &Prints 0 Plans 0 Samples 0 Specifications •j 0 Copy of letter 0 Change order ❑ � a • TRANSMITTED checked below:THESE ARE � , 0 For approval ,. For your use 0 As requested 0 For review and comment ' COPIES PAGE# DESCRIPTIC3 '! r 1 each Application form, check, for required fee, asessors maps, ownership list, a, narrative, soils report, traffic report , Redued site plan, written justification and City pre-application checklist 3 each Architectural drawings including floor plans & elevations of buildings , A L' and the main and secondary community buildings, Sheets Al-A13 ., 12 each Site development drawings.9 Sheets SDI - SD7 r• t• i "i' Lila As'C k,-ks-r-1M► "t,11-- ts,l'ay�,,, iii I �> REMARKS Ca las: f7 r• 'Yellow Originator 1 Pink Project File r - 4' SIGNED; " Gold Numeric rile i Poser 'u, 'ou 't"on ' ' 11 enclosures ere nol es noted notify us tit once• 4 " I" . i ..,. .. .. ,,... ,.pr • A.,W,+N tlIW..i.M,JI.Y Jd'dtOiSY,.i J•ry A t -, r-r. ,Y l..Mft C ii-' r ,.-, _' 'tr..J C(wd rr t_., y:..° X °!.. {:' s -{ i f---1117P—E,' :t:., '-� —J I,�4 1 IT. , }, t. . .,. ,:l 'r +fit 1 M'Y • gi ', ;, u rF,F'C l t t_I_ �. ].� �'�:��,T +r .o 7t�'�° JL`�E i_t��r,�r�' .r vF��,.tp,. �"�` n4, Y �, ,,, �� _.>•.'.ta r Lr�� n 4,r,,{�' F'. , �J of ,. . •* ,..,- .. . ,.,, ,a r••�r .._ •rp •d,.t ;, jf: ,. vril' 'n r71'.`'➢ ,r. rFF��i "1� r a"' a,, .. Fr' aw i. m . .. .:.:f, '{nr. 1 _, ,.YM, p R, , ,•..y• ri. � ,{ ii � yy. � � 1.., .. �. . .,6 , -l. ,. 6, �t t ..b, 'iV'','; ... a't.• iav .AI lu{41'., -,, rt•ayi,..ii. ;., ,F ft tI. vl.., Vii.j. .11f, +',IlIY„n• ,'a• ', .. .. :1, .. J n,,..�'.-r- ....:v-i1 P.1,/....,._ , �� :, ,:, ,. {�,. ,,,.a J:.� . r; r J. f „_ t (,, ..�. ,. .x.,,:l7ii','�.{ .1 �e��, V ��aq..ri.�31:�`lvC. t. ..4:s. 14,, �' •, ,. ,ef F.� {,�. � {1 a ,r ,d.. ,�!, r as_r ,t,f. t v .4 1Y , ,+1Y, +'�'�. t�.,.�a ;+�,,... t• �. •r: ,cd +''t�,. N •i' 4+. a a,. 1, tt ; it d{{ jr.4 r as r1..,! rN r r}.r I 4 a3t�, r '� 'r. -,i, f. i.,,rr .C +::� 1.a� •Y h+.; ) "J.s' J AI...tt.. ,M. �, / � v+ A , "' ,.J.. '4,..... . t f ri, 1 7 r'. yrr:, 1.. 1, , :r 9 r ..0,.„ , ,Vi a.. n S r" �!, .,... v. �'4F?., '�: ,J .la.., "3 I �'lt_ '4:1''�' Iv .r` a.>i„ tf p!'. ..'Y�'� 'It '.r,v .LY�,✓' .r z... {r � ,''b r �.S?1 i< r• p +,r. t } t I•rr'� T� ,J:- >. F1�' ,f, .�„ :fY.i C.,�' ..c } ..Y.,, �r .t+'„� i ,.k ,+.d t+f s 4�<•b 1 r ,•1-:d ,: - 4 ,.,.,, � If`t.,L .. i,5, .. 1 r7^x , � Ef „Y .t�, •� y(�� � r, yrA'jf".f ,f r: _ ,... ,Jr., a --: � _,. � r ,.. .- {. _� . Yr'•'3 ,' � �...,.:y1 q3 i''' pt 1:.'.” .,!Y,�p !d .,R"' n ri.>.1 ,y �... 1, Y i }'j a { "s .... a •l.. t, :Swig... 3. h .� � � ...:.'.• a n: - ..,Y. ,. �4` t.FY G,tJF t,, I , ,'. .Ct..:•f i � .l i�. 7 3+1 'A,( hkr•�. ,.lP�, y. ca. - 1,1 rt,, .�."n It„ .1,, rr rt. jwr� , v 1 }l .� J'. Y. ..v. .. vi a, G"1-f.. tt , Yr a .rU , r$. 1..r a,4r,•. -•�. 'H;,;I'.i :�'a 9 F li. I. rj�t (�... ci .af / i:.Z., � ,1, _d..r..r ,.. .. 1, „ .:. r w< n'r3;,} t.'^.a.d_� 1r..r.. p•..,1 s(•1. u e:l k•.aY.l:.;"f i,.rvk`i:'.., '�. .. .,,,F :.'7 1�t l: F`: 1� STl4'i't.I•.- •, ..'N-r:.4.� IC ,g !f n Y .'11• •Mrt�v{Y n 1 ,3 ..:1, ..4, ,t P 17. , !Y•t t�' .. :a<, 1 .e`- . r.... +f- •• « 'J°y.?,t- .t'i .(!h r .. ..5 .. f 1 d.YY,... y�' ,r ,'� u•, .a, {. .i- r�;�: }, • .. r�' .... ",.11,- .+_, �.t`"},.. ..,,.- J t jj- 1 , g1a4) ,F J n,. C,rt'. ,r:,:. .1.. ,. .t. �-, .. � «. 6 ,.�1t.r .:j„jr+v +: :d•.. 'f•� r,.ri� f ., : 5.:,,.. �1-�....._c. .7t •�L, h, r l�x�a.r, ,,A. .'�¢¢ .-..rt,, !, �_.. ,L 1f,.,>3 r t, rl �'':.t!7 :� , ti,,:-, r,.. . � r. ,r, .� ,:rr � ,s� .. - ,I ,, IYt, ,r,aic.nr+ .,, f:,,J` ,t f� r ..ta Ji ..s .�•, � ,a.. t .rr< � r' .r.,f.i,, Y �t,.r $c + ,. � , J t{k• 7.b i.rt k..� It .r�. r . i.. t _ t:,. r rf ..T. ,�r I ?.. J,�'l�N I- t{..r, � .. r. ,,. �r� r u 7>, r�,��' ti ., ,�'. i �. .. ,'r. ,1 it 5 , „ 4 .•d ,�. e „1:. r,f ,y: ,'4 ..r . ,:.t r n_ ..x:-.,b„, '' 4c, t , R;d4 9 r r ,h. !R �. kk • ,1, • i f,. ,r6, ;. ,'t :.r 3;_nt�,.�t,._._.}e .r.,4 ...,. ! , 5,,y y. J So,., rl •! L1 . ., 1',, --,YY, .� a,- ,,.11 r t •,kG r, a-... ,- _.. t--, r.f.. a .:. L, ;... �,� :, ., .-.. •, ,� � ..S i 1 a � Y. ,�1M..1r;,. .f. -- ,r ...lu;�v ;1"�{ ��.�. 1 xt,: ,. ,''• ,r r.,r ,-''''' 1 #.A ,,.aa, •,',. ••-.d' L -?v 1, . . ,:'„d rr .l.C t t. .`§:.. t ,,. '4 -t ii I ! ! .,,i, F Y n'. d�} ., a� r d, C. 1 3 '41'1.4,,. r4(('� ,I,h. , ,�}t :.,f t .•, :,;;f• : ,,«.�., ,.,, �ti•. .. 1.n+.1.4..,.,:r .,,9,,,,,'1,;.� .-. .. ,, �.i - �.. Y ..f�. r.•R. 1. .. ..3. a .�rd, .. A, l " .. , 7.'�,r:^7fi-P R. xf'.as ., rt,. _'.t�a.n,..f I,lu , .,,.�y.. . �i., 1r rf ,._ ,s- -,t.r,,. . -..�, �i,.,.r x..•�� ., •^1'y .a,.'1"'''',`y"�,.,Y r�.., t.t ..�..r, -�M,r. v. - 1'� 1 +,:.Q...�N l;,`�JI .,1,.L,,. ., a, : . 1 :_•I. f..YT.f R...t,. 4 t /s,.,,1 r� : , ,.4 �",,,, r r. ., , �r, ,. `L �.EE.'' �,{)-,� L '''''''',.1.:, ] a . , , +. , a4;. r,.r„-. t!.P} . ,.` ».,. .�:i .,>, ,�4 .,-...An s 141.i''',.'5'!. .. I....1,p. !.� , , _ ,�',,.,.d t•,, 1 T�'Irr f r� � �., .� .r.r I ri a.. �•a r,f � i.. .M. ks y .FL, ��,. r� ,. S�.4 U n• , ,f t , , ,.t. ,:, .,l y ,.•,,, r, r,l ,. r•. : t {r .,-..r„ t .., 'f„ r „'1f! A. .., .^''' !.a x-ei•: .,T4r..,, i,1..( Ju• -L +. ,1 A t ,t. o r fr rl. n J --, r',s t C, .s, L ;tf r}I: ,h :�, ..F r .i { t ,S� hF. �' ,r �. 1.�, +1. ,fi� it JI V.f� ryS rJ Gn_r ,••y. • 1 '� „ r'- ,c� , ._.'G-.. ,,,.: , ,. :.I Y,!, n�' .�: ,,`1.. , .-„ , {7..'.`� .�.t -.51` ,,}.f. ,f .f'i47 r. .P� .; .-t' ]• .., :'. ,., �.,. .. r+ �. 1. ..3 .,. ::�it'�. rtvl ,.:tt "), w�• Ire'+ �dr Psi, •�,,, :c"r,..n Y ., 1 ' t n� .. E-r .r a X .f ✓ ,,,C., f n, , }r � t h td, t +, ))r t J yC Vin, . •,-., . . C� .. Irv. v � n�r 4 , .,.. ., a1 ,ir•r +.. ..., , . �-� Y.,, 1 ��'t':i it ,1/ :, •..1'�/'n S7 1 tia ,..'•:.,, ,{ tf . 'l.. p�** ,1� �}{. ,. ... ... n a arc. , � 7 , ,-. :y... t, .,..I. , -.. ��,. ,• ..., 4�1. r,.y •► tI ,t„s ,� �., :,t i a x+.i,1., 1 :r, 7` �7 C(�l., r��'; h� p .�.�, G 7 :1 t n. 1 % l•. `r , • i, `..-,.. r. ,i. v� :•,.. u 11•i.• tt S y ,' , P. I -l.t.,:. . i kl'• tc ,r v •1, i-7 4�4 ••11 ,: Y :.s«Ti -... L`_.n .:l�.d..�, � .._.:. 2 +i , „ p. , hn.)`; ,:F., .,.., .. ,µ � „i: , Y.r. , ,-.,.. ,:., +..A. v :.F'.�r,,.:, ar d .:.,, c 4i. Y f ,y , / ,: r r ;-.. 't,},.;• .. ,d” .,R:.a'•11 �, • A. ; ..• ,., za is v .113....-,. l ...,.... .. ... ,=2 }�..�... i•{' ...�'. {. ,7 �.h. ,A._fn, , r,�...G••h y,r,I{..". �l v .. _. :a� .fF l.. .m.! }it ,.J.. �t,t -IY■•�h,F u�r�. r. 'I- Ii.. ,Fr _ r $;s^,...... .. r ,. ,. Y t v r:,+. 'V.w -n r t.. Y , d 1. .. E.. .,Ir:.. , .,v. � 7.t'\ s,.:,,...,,...,,, ,?' .,,J ,r.r � �:AU.� .ppt f, • ' �i rl .,. ,:, r., ,:..,".:..Yrr-.:.L,l. f! F�. 1.,/n., 9r<, a l .n..-r 1.,f,. .Yf ,L ,-..� ,! .."{.pp ,r f}`, YY. ,'�.r k,.,�t, 3. t �I.. t'). 5 .,.,i ..a,3. i rI ,.t� � n < ,R 1,,� A4 >., ,. r ,,.r,ta A.t f,Y,`• cr�., t:. J. �••.0 , ,n - ti" ., r „f , , ( '�„ ,Yr„d , ;¢..�t , t ,.nre 5 .g •., ,,•.•t�, 1 to.,y . , t i :, .r 1. � .I .L 77 r ,w f. k 1 ,'�, s J", t :I �. 1 � � � a J Ik ,a r r� ,r,1: r''�.V l r, :r f. � ). � �,a .d I i,.�_ .. ,,; n, 4„..4.v..,,,,.� ti4 ., , , 1 r , ,i k� r �,4 , Jr dr,. Y e ,,, ,G. .t, e,f i 1 j.«, Y. f }.. +,., � fS i, �n, , 4 'v r, .F t. r td• r.L,$. ,i t, !, .a,, , -.r,... M,.. ...,r.. ,, . .. ,-,,,,,,,Ad a, } � .slv S �. J.._.4 N .1�... a.. 1., , �a,5 f, ,'k. ,fe. ..-.a,/, ,{ .. i.. 1-,.- -..a S , I t cv,.,.d..q�. ,�.w , h. ,.�1 -L ,. �,. f { t:- -}.4.1t''Y'r N„r -.: � a ,: r,. {„,,11,,!,,;„ SL, , .. ... rSij 7 T:r. , n i . �.n,t., � ,I•,. .,rC',,• pp•' 1�11Y. �..r „u .,a, ,.Sr /. �� .,1,rI lt,.. J n 4ir ..14,r, Y-�: i�'.i�. , t:51�.., rY. .t. rr... .I. . a...Y. t f� rt r , 1 r.. �.1,r 1f t.,, -,: .'In lJ.,p eY 4 wo r x . ,,.Zr Y., ,N d ,t « YK �7/ w v'.. i ..1, y �ls _v,,, -e r I .1 . r!, r �” .. ,» x: .aK'Y `...)' •I t Yr:<i. /� '4�a r`•.}. , 1 r Ir.4l f ”,� .: .. .- ,t., A, rScf, ,� �„Y..;t. ,a,7 1,,l R >YL ,.k.l,f!3 1/,, 1, �a x T,ti. ,ry .t:,� •'”,41 A s ,.t �, .�`✓ 7 :4,� ..,.. ,:° ,..,Il:Frf4 r IfeLC.I..SL"�4'Mi -.,7...,� .Y.r .r't:�l! , Tr,R _Y , r.. �.. 5 '�, r, � .S -I t a t .r. , ,.,;.. xr r r �r,�' ,k�' � ! ,u i�� 1 ,� 1 r.:, '� 4�t ,< �. �, r t .,~ , , d,,.. .n•.» .t.. n,, fa d, 4 4 .,.k- n h .1 .wr 1 a .l,t a ,M !7. !W. d: ,%? .r ,t.a ,t ?,, #{,•..'4 .k.,,' 4 r,r., �a k I . i, t Y r r t'i ,r., f ,• - ecYr�r.,, •, 1"t ,'�':, ..�. , M ' - .-_.3'Ji.,. ,,, ,.a ,,,,.,..~w .=f r!,., .�r~.,a 1. ... ,., ,w(,: 1, ( ( ,..•'.• 3 .1 t,,r ., b._ ! ,S , .t % e,r.. , . . ..r..4.. !.f. t , 1 r.+, ^IC_r-.,} .n.,,vr, P.l. •' 4• �, .r ,.. y .. , ,331 i.:, •.-. u t r. .r ,c ,. G.,. 4., t � ,ar ir, t..w a ( .+, ,.•. 1 s �a. r.,t Y. �. ?F t .n .t.., .BLS- x><.. ur3.rs..�• .� ._., . � ..H,. l,rt ,r m. ,.�,,.,� ., rx�. 7a� ;�'?, v � ,. .,.,ri.}-�1_, ,.. .„ ,-„..,.A yy ,had, \.. ,: 1� 1'V-. ryta 1 s ..t . �. ,/ G' �,., r!!,.• :....,,. .W. 1.,f , U..: n..�y•. 7J. I,.I,,.:•X a,t > .7i", n ,. ,LI,*•1 r� 1�.a, -k 'k-n�, �.tl:F .�.• i:l, �t..0 T. ,C �{f �''ir'�. a, , �itd.i,rPUi +,n,i ,L,..",...4 .. � 4 ,: r ,f Ir u' urJ n}Y ,j• rA a,Pti t � +.. a•.4r. >t- if �.at�i1' ,,i', ..'>F� �J.s.r, :,d.� D �.. .,. .i YY y ,. . .� '�- 1,1. r. .4,`N� Y v,,, _� t „j , r- s'a +.,�,;. _,d � .wro. vr,..,. , !k L� ,,,1,„ ./.,. ... ,,� ,.,,,, a r, ,,.. I! .•,r, ,rAr,.. r ,r.r Ju! T >i , � -�, L ,., .:,.- v �,. -+....w .,,., f .,_. .. , ,,. i v -,f. � kjJ,;b r of ill•,j,� 11 .. � t°, d �. <1,tY ...,,1? .t, � •}.s ,. ��*-}} 7, -.>.r.. ,s,..�r � star...,, .}p , , i.�,.:� ..,Y:i. n-.'t n.! ,� r,' ,::,1,. b r t, �.,,�. .a.,: .�..c.r. . ..:{r:h ..,•r. A Y.v' r. l,i,T 1}}R�{�,,.r-u, ...-k,- , .i �..r J-- ♦ ,..r. .i.,fir Ya., _x,., k. , vv��..- t((2+, w 1 ,Q t -.... r tt.iti�, k .,.... ,i, I r. .1 a 1, i,... .u., • . t�.�.... a. ,t}^.,. ._ ....- ,... f'tfl.....r,1�, d .. ,.:r .,,,, �. -, Y Y"i, ar.., :�.a� 4. -,� . a.t``1 r r 1•k 6'r � ,�'(Y3... h.. '.,-„,v ..r.l.. .y„ ..1 :St,+,. '4 c �+..Fr Yr ,1«. d � .4, tr.l }: ,f, � 4{, , 7 .4 I 7, t r.. f1I'IF •� t• ., ,V ,iN, vF� � }, �. 1 .�e C I'f. 'v L*« �'d /r�y�.m,�L rc 1 }` ,�I,a, v t'l.Ih Ala 1.;n�. y,: ,t ,I., �.. { c; air -, t'l r¢w� ..,«. _t�- i.� 1� 1L� �.f, '-1 ,Ir t� Yl,,.ri 7 -}, ,,N Y.•r 't ;Y,rS,l CL 1 Y Y h k',-''�' " 1 a,� Ir $ , i, Rl�a. w 'r.r/ r,Y.' '.. t E r.v •Y,t�.. .IJ' �..{�{�,. y .ya'-rt, ..t,!'.., 1 { � •W.r' , '�y,'r.a r � t• .,,, .;-. ....1,. .i', x 1, �Ir � �,VI r� f:'2 i,t. p I., 4, �.r::� t.' .. h' ,. f ,a,U . n. '1rl,ti.. :1,3 i .t }...1.. w.r., y r.:.,4 I �a ,, Y t r,S,y (....,$ 'tr..r a is r; . .:/ _r,.Y�h�r.,}Y „a.>,f?;2,,r,., rr.1..”;j,t,•a, „v+r c 't.Yr . ',w , A:,,n..t.. �}�tM1 ,,,,.,,+L fL:+!t3�L-'fJ.�..IY'..�.ya.L6t'�.'r!"a.a.,1.,i..�.f,Y.. txr,l�it_pit�r.r�.i;.,.ka,I k f�. .�.,�.Yd., 411 :a h ',c.o... „,i 'r .., ,-, r_'f"'; , I, .:.im.' ,+.,.n,3 ,.. :� �i{:.,•,,,., :,f,' „:,`,:',,.:,;•,,,,,,,,:' ', 'b. ,, �v` m' .�/.' ,.'� F -. dayp a i .,., ry < ,.,. 7. .. ,, r.ir. n„,. . .. ..<.....�:, , � ..u .v ,.4t 1 1< I .r r.... ..,. +. Sv r' •,11, 1 r �� .I.•a+,Ti „ 3.,d,.., ,,1 ,7,.F., tJ ,., r .. ,, .,Y I t ,, l. !,: a. ,t• ,f t `6 r..: r t,.'f{,4it-...8`c.,.� .. .. .”. m .lv,J.-,-..,, 4.1„Y,n,t,da,,. .Z?n..:} t r .,,,.., ,3, .a, L }s,�iYY.,.v,,„t. :)' ..,,..I a,r. v a.r,r, yyi' ! f:' r r•' J. '� � ti,r�r i, . .w. .,, ..il! _!« .. 15" r.!�,r '., � t ir, ,lr,.1.r,3,t P�` �'va.. ,. ./ , ,.. 4sr 1.4 f • I..' .,.t}, d'a.,,x ,,. .. ..'fit`.t,r. �r h. k . .,.. , ,�, ri., »,•,t`1.,�.,4,.4�i, J.--`<,4I n�,�F: k r(� ,- r„ 1 �s •y i��ap 4,.,. ti.i '�j{ry, 1 ��aa 1 N� ,�. , Y.. r.. 4 .'Y,l. /'. , g�, 'YC• /:,Cf. � � S 1 Y' .p� T'l•r:Y,hp /.r,.r' :1�hY „ M: ,• '.•...f.r f6:„4� • 3] ,,Y.:,rt,"ik" (�3j�,..�;. , ..,�.,'.:'h !. ;1�.t ilr r 1 r •4 l .11.. :jX I, ,A , r.:.,.:y��,., !!c.Y..�} (' '1-!r. r, �J }{i r,t.r u.. r�.D!.' Iw . OS..I. r... „K' I t'K-r F„ ,; r ,.r:. ,+t Y ,,, „4, ,i, ,c. ,r ,r y ,' v I, •,r .r... _: ,., ,,.4,, ,!r. .,. `� I .. s . .,.,.,.. ,�,}. +�c.J }'4 .r ! ,t.(l ,i.417.',%, rj yRy• 1 - '<. �.x v, ,Y, r .:f,n Yl 1 1., r. it v,. d.1 v • Y r , J ..r, ,r „ � a+ . _Lot, I�dl�3.... .rk,.t.i.•G'C,..a'5 a. 3G.,.r ."# ,P;. , ,' al 'k.;p{HµaS't _.�t./rt,.-4)l..,f!fl�...c�.S„+rr,;. ..y i.:M1i(/.Cr ,,,)�,.a7 v)t.,., ,., .•.'_ i n h ,t• ,( ti IY;„"„, iC:ry:,,t•ff..:�l'�l. Ir.lk°4'rb,,�d��v'.• � k�)` �l.' j .d r•,r.f+J c t~.' y.� i.nv-„ervwl Ir-r°,dl Lw .e If7.� arr. ..,.1 ,}.,1 .{. ,'X Irer„ I.}a:•W xr. t.., :. • d A. •r` �a r ,A���/�rY„r. ih1 4j38 •,: ` 1 3 I• ATi , r 4�` `f ,•Y,rt, s , wMy , J, tl, ' pr, • � 4.. �� r4 Y w •r I '''*l M C Wr,.........t B 'S,,,..2,1B6/.5t1M�Lf,µILIEJ 1YpSy0 a , �•. ",."I,rawN A' dl*,,,,,,,,,.•• 1 +' y w•rrn. - - �rwWrw,.,rw►wrrrVr4W+r,/•+,�„r, YaN � �r,.••�,.n+,•q-.w1.ivTwwr irr.w.rw,v,r,rmw.wbwrlf r f , • t { % ['' (r' rt.. { rtp'@IfIIW ,r..rr.uvarwr,•..w,wY�,.,maa.iwu+ a-v,l�..�v w+',,.•.Irv-rY'•rry^v.aw,.rrl..,�.w..+rw•+rM.�wa.. y, • l y7 '% 1,15 „a1cHNiw.l,•nrw„•r.�+r.w r.GlrVl'.rnWNYMINMi1,Y+'aY,lr,b ._. a , `''� ,1, ° / , s1t ti Y Y' .rwr,rmiww,rr wLw.bMUrr•Ir er W -'v.+vbY1rr�,..,Ya `Jdr r Y,+f,r�„ r ,i t It5t c tig 4c r s4 p'avor'ty f iat' ,l t tt ,.tz s tp dux of testis tb*r n 4. •' �,► 4 �k� EXAt�s!t A r�rTA�c,'iErl, 5utd°rt~r r:.a AXE lot YE�►R �q88"r8g. StnrUlORv ,� - '• '''t it TI'''',f`''',yr? 't�rr! 0tt4EPS AND A5"SESSAEf 1 Of w f l,JED SEIIEt�AGfE AGENsY: RESERVAI LO C' ''.4 IN eooK ` ., .k'r 311,PAGE 327 ., p ' -' t .I tif: .�v'..:�,N•r,,,W './-^••-riG'—f-. '0,"—t""?'.nF 4J''i�"ii.. �i x, T 3 s,grog ey ut Ott of eau. t,bt nc,t,EXCEPT: �t 'N.N p.. ft�r,�Gp GWqy�,`a���lU'd i ' lL ��Yn ,p ;"i+ rl s :;d•is4 1;, w `,1.4 'V7 a rim.arc*ft t'itx J....r, ., •r,3.. . d .t E s f 3 , e o ? y 1 '�v�} ,1-4,,, t Xftl n p"Y .4.1.,,,,,,i,,,,,,......,..1,:-....,..e.:"":� r Z.,i ,,r+ I La ! tAY ; ;:- `r 1'S 1r Y+ ;:::',..1:':'-1.:1...., 1'i Iv"fj tY fY, .1• Y�r'yr 1. 1 4,'y4'.' KcdR VFYV D Tt / r5 l,' }� 9 � g pf�C Try��.�t,Y;y��py,g•g� �y�q{ �,y,,�I�,� !�{�y1�•��7�'�p�}OF pIg'y�yy�y,.y�y�yYS�ayy py �r1�y� +�,i,µby y �I�,¢�j+' ,•• +• '' '� 44;t��+At4 Tir,,,,,,,W+` f�i J 6HBb,.Y Ifig1`gLI{*AEWt tli L1 d`rt/! L1,`p'Pl' U8 'LJi'�biln.L`7topleM1rd D ftlegt)I C /HIS 4'W'4R41T ., ,r 1 , 1 19' br74 �1,: , ',1,1",,;,4',I5,1"„, 4-4,it+:.t'4,,V,c,may' "J41d�} +T I'1 O da..P '•IC;,E1LE L&1 x>u 'LAWS AND t MUI.ATtON$,ot'�? .°ti31O1 t1 OLt A l +x y I ! 4 .,,,, r r r"1 12,1,1111.114„,,N1,4, PE N CQIJIRI ra 1.1 TO THE O EkTY,140 _, ^&1.60' TH ' ,F y�_, y� tiv�, t trtt ur�,�S Y, ,s^ 1 d, t" .... .1 IT,� 1 t t Y a C ar t -i vY+t X'wad Yl tt r r5 x twt t�f Olt t rl 't 't. i177�hdG}TI 1 t4:' I f C 1` tP +�4' t 1 ►” r `,• w 1, tl ,. it,t,',,;j 1 , 7 4 U i < ,fX...tt 0 1.0,v r}efi ,t aa'7` r.+wA.2: J- ".,i�.• ,'•lxv .11.Anttb I'4'Il dtlMuI1M6►M1 lit I. :1 k.i2!'fY :J., •I t1 >rl'''.e?”':i l,r.i!_lri:K,t� "L Bd Ertl lIYIkF 7Al!(1Jk�"f d'R.h,:4 d�YtY t#J fF°r9 1 • ,. am.•w d. rY � W,wor arm,wa,I+Yw.r.,ra+„+.r,owrmmu4w.+.mwJrw.wv r,.+,rw:,:,na,•f,..ww.w..,w,num.�a„w,,...:.,a. t ,i , I •r LaGt«y ■ ^ j ',,,) I,;�,N!,.. WYYUMnumKbmY .I YWYfM„WYY1MIi.'/apstn'.MMIriYK+wW a1'n,WWra+>„YU.,T.evKdo.',:w'MCYr^RUr..m>Y':::cnbrlpltd.d.h'W,tl•'rl»meWmtlsr.xq/mgmgwYSikkpYY%kt.%tl.rTYLXYdWWhV4M4+W,M/J„NiNLY:IJ: 4 ,• !.1 II { t , • n u7 S 7 t� ISM 4 �I�I tiuba. G>5��f , 1 i t t,P°■ • nil'-‘,.'",..,',,,N ,1 ,,,0, - ���,l�}{'� .......... •MT rM•IY•TYJ T1,aar+Y,BrR.w',Ww,MJM1YY+,a,MN Mp.YM.rp.14,M ,,,:YwWN, Np r 1 /• Orx,.,, j: q 1 cr it " .., ,, ,,. }"+h.+ .. ,•.(, ! ,se ' I ,' „,...,..,,.r, '47! -Y d y,t n.r+,,:r ' r °r�” .�"'.a+y_'�"„ "'` .ak A,rY �r"" r '�'"", '' +. i : I s.. s1$ Ir'1 ' +fir+' , ( ,j�,,:,e} .'Sr"° l.n,•.T w,w ..»,df•.vw- N`a. ,t»A.e �'` 'r�•w, .+.r.,... t r i, l: k*x dIFP "�t^ G S fi r�1a F G FL yl. 1'��1wK Y �i' .,✓ r;fi I r t'• F`1 t l{1r r' r,!AZ. �,,. s 't PIA Ng'.'.'r GERA I . r'ttli :,:*YSI,r�:..,,'r t' yy ,...,,w.,...,.. „: „ .._.„s _-s, „.,.r aewr.rr.re.,nwmsrw,nam„ywurNWrr,.re;a�'w.,•,xr,Ye YJ '•r� ��; ,. 0 41)IY A ",r t, t .,f,., •,r• -.: .,aaa:nr.•arslmwY.aarw,Antln.YS•,+-k:.ba.ar�rs-,. „;:k.:,...H t.lir, C » a , r.... ..y.. .e..rwrranN.+r.. ,nw M . i ` S !� 1 I rr r { p�r}i-,,a'y fig.11 y /y�,7�1,,��yy,�e�p)W�.YYq i, gWrV'�.,y '4,..,.... . - , It , _ ySLh�,,C t l',.. t:,T M iI'114'jA''tR,4 I 1 p'f w"MI'RW7Gf.11:I,Ybi 4 fr A(.R1:K,,lo Y7 Crf'LeM+Y7,.Af 44-4,t ltl4:,' • :i-. i 1 v C r,prt f'.r.,,9{p?f!P,� 1•rS.I tr. ... +,i -t +,Y, q ;' �yu ''+'4" ry{ 7 rl t- ,k i.i:,'hl, 1- ,1 4 -;i r vc' , , �,3�'µ•atl,E 4,Y"Pid,i ;,r?,F',a,,f,,` I f f ,4 4 ' '' '-'�w ''' ' +, , : {r s ' I rtY t i G+;apr�L'I 'wrf ","„;,.,''''""-Y,-•..,,5..„ Ct ' ,:.t-lr 1 t ; t »' ifty r n I "ti i ry r�' 1 ivl •'VJ�, �R ,Z tl 1,n:, r ^+ A n 0, A „.. , • ,tY �til, fJ, ! 1,J.� ��l ] r yA ITI+,t$r.ld4yllYdt��tai� aUttt5' dY tip �tilteC3 71"1llh��ryr �S1t k�,$ IM �} t 71 s 1,,,...f,.,,,,,,,,,/,.., ik ' , rD'S' ,4'"it.' r"'"J'it '1+ 13w U1�' M '"1 "R7.,ti"J. ..I'is X' S, •1 �r 11,1.' ......r,ivr.....v,i,`411,p f. __,,,, ..„.w..— 1.1........ .L ,t1.r.r$ '1,ryt{',.i1f Y, /t,i ',",'I."1, ar rr4 Y" u 1, u,. 1 1 tr' v. t,'t, 1 {py�(�,:,.,./,�J�_,,ty& ,,.,�.ry f:'V ?:''y. •a:r..C'•IC Ia ,: N 1,-.r,�I',a:4I -+L,w.�ry�Y ”'^"'TTa7Y1tt�.P3`• `•-•.!7•�rIIY74".ii L1:..rYI.-•1,G,'":SeY,Y;fKitit,;l.T.A, ,i� r•�•L'pNet s SW'S71✓a' T. t31 —A 4. �t , i'+'+:w W........ ....._ ,.e. �r;;a.:.n;__x..,-p �`a--..:-r.-a':-wrar,,.•„ • ,N,��,��,�,yy tit,.: i�Y r ,} }I ,„�S'1�,tn r•r pT:. , d.I,c ," `°" 'f " , +..r.r'- ,I,,, aY,a..,aa�YU:.::x xu'yr'4 6(. ,,• j1r" al"�C ,xt,to Ft1 'G- ow 'y „r+. fr.'YYr.•r«,.� a •. .. y ,,,,:t., tti �i '�yTr�lr°.;'ll, �.,sys;pY,nlsaY,-?av t� ,.,+e�;.+aap,rrow,4;,,'.u14T rwn're»u+w«.,r.wdtsr:.p+�a,w,rr,.a.u.,,.lw�..Ym+warw 1:,,,,,7, ,,'1 E; d. •'.,4. c'.,4ttg.404t. 0.dlfl 04 1'Of tttft grpl�t*NS h ', trr it%y,4 t ,l,, t,'F'i i M 1- a • ,J N 3 1� , r t i . f �{! $r, a,3r F i YFXr'+ 1 ," a 4- p �� ur,� ..ay ,l 1 t}t w ,,ftr �' 1 l ">f�t �rriY • .It n r +�3r. "M't�l '•vim ��•b/u1'+kr'}, .-:. ,Ct1,�Iq.Y�rS+• .., . ai- w . ,.a.. ,.. .,a,-,:u r .,r ,... t y`I;. , qq,,�� is f,,}y ,Id�ca�r� i, ��u f� L,,1t.�,y,W �y� .. ..:,. , y'14:i,Tr..,,,,t j1J' 7d ,m}! _. T A. J I p440, t�•'Pokli.t tor #.vfaY3n8 1�'Y,,rw•r Y'tbblk tOr aIYY � i{ti'. \.'',,"4,.,.....','„e / r , ,ltl r 7"�ifl,-,,,t',"'1,'Y �� rLk rdrfv��t.k�a�Ii. •�•Y �,y �ijv�-,,,,1,4'My f a�rCdrt' k�r « ,r� � ��;1Y��"'l`df'�1�7ft.��.�l.�Ily:{I"S�YIYI�,'If, 1...''',.if ,.;f f r• �t� i !,,, ,rte '�Sp r 5,f ✓' 1 Nr, ,t I .w,.Ii .1 .' f r 7 � .K UAL�/v 1,. r , 4$r! „ r f i., r 1 a •'_c ,7-1 t v• t/ tj- ' uaud�•.�{r} cI ,I: y �j. � yr I,ta..`?r .:164„l" /1 t;.n 1 p r,•,P n1c 1't"6`ttt,l'S1P1 (1"Y 6�ESEiPt+PD P'e.)A r«1r 4� IE.RY,S OSE l',;'', li 1 •,...1 t list' ,,1,, V rn Cl;f,r r,« 4, I F!'i'�' I!(1V ewl�'4141 1 w•wm rtyL�.p,r.�wrwwlwuurc+n,ww,arra:.rr+ux,.m•:.l<el,+vun v..m»;aNarur t y' t ;`t`'f` '"J h�^r,b � �J,9"Ai�fi�r Rr YV A`)W:•at-i"�""�I•'1'�,IJt�qlG.'truilrtk,sxxC.%,Y',v,!rrLWtipIAA�:ar:1:Hi � ,"�1 'Y 1 III ' f a 4 : '.,f !-1, l i {JiL+, 41,4i e+ntrNal6, ,01,014t ' ,. , �` f "4,,, , i v 3opt,,,OyK9 DON : . ' - • AA, .. • 1,01%i Jt4 f$ARefu�+ Et tit) Jt •,!, y m-Y }, A 04, L,Atio, Ott 9/I49. xt.,u�', IJ '! NJl1"tlh aSUl7Aklib +Cth ' rv,' 4 1,,,: , ' •; •„-,.,.a+-Y,+o+",«»n,M,+.wlr.YiYmp.ha�r.. ..Y.w.wrrs vl:w:riaaNt:;.,+.rw wa"..,re w,ana.• 4 I � � I �45aYdti4YPd '. � bTf��;kN,Y',k t;,JF:; �`1i ;-'l tiw q.n.Y� n, asr :q,! f 1 x,w+ryhNNn���k It}N rla, ;, ,�, _.kra'- �, / `F;' • 7 y„ ."IB' >+yr,'' 1 r'', bl Ytoe ,i't ..Wt titrI .1.Jib' tj 1'~ `,',t11„,,,,0',.... y " t""1 yl i n7 t,'i'W,Y,r'iIS 44, '4 "IA kii' lll144 ki•.. 2 • - , r (. r rt 1(,rij, n ‘'.1';',..t.; 1p �,.,r),Mp Y F: {4 Nr f I- , ■ }Y'I�: 1 i1''a'J.,t••. I :1 ly ) ` ,+ d ,r'^S . n A tl ( .•tp ly�.,? ,,,,taY"'TtY,e,,,td,,! ,,Y :rx„,-,.,P ,4, .,,tl'•,,+a:• r,, a ,y f'1 1 ''tr»�°�l� .r a-1 M„ Y J },-, Y.,..t },',...,t:r:t'(Y1 M�'',:,:\‘;*:".,;;',.,,,,,,,'. ;�{q.Yd,1+Y+”�;I,-�n t Jr8 YiY,U Wga,'wj" 71'%"1 ' . ,sHyL, .y 1i 1 : y., 0i 04.it ri,1 `I d 1.f-.,t,Aktl,�t+, rr-,r,�a,A t ! 71, -f_''e " J ° +'tLy (�4 i �fl j,'�'c''hiN Y' yffi ,1'r,f✓ 'F se,t t . I Ili .. 1111,1111111111111•11111111111111111111111111111111111111A111111111111111111111211:.: ••• , ,..., . , ..,.. . . . . ,, ..... ';''.';',':;,";-:::*'...;• ''.: , .,. :, „ , . ,... „ , , l':',",":"..1.:::..,);.,:::i . . . , , , ., . . . , a•. •'• ,,,,,, .• •' ",,,,,i,••1,'+a,,,,,,,,i..r..,',..,,,,,r+-7,,,,-., ,..r., . ,',fi'':.'.../;•-i.' t4.•,., ,,,..,..0,,,,s.,,,,;-v.,,,;-,,,,:p.,,,I,Lco;;,,J,..,11:,,,,,:,,,,,y.,4,,L';''','f t ,,,,,,,,,,I,ig,;.,,,:r,..„).4., . ,,, , , t, ,,,,■:. 'fit',4t.,..":0,,,-,7,,,"4.',,,,', /f.;,7*..11''.1,,WY,C.;q1,!1,..!..f.',...1',1,"-.1■!,,q,',,;•714.;.",'':'..ii;1.'‘C):,*;PI, ,*, P.,..7!1;',.i2i ,4''',';:77.14;',,ft.,''.,1,11A' ',.?:',.!•1,,,,,h,.,;:t:.7.;,,:,,,,,..‘7,11.1.1..,,,,t,'-",,'; ',,i',,,,,,,,!10'.....,.':,,,;"'k;...t:',,,,,L1',.:;;.!,',,',i,..,.e!'.i.i,,,,,,,,....':',1",,,..'., . ,;,..-....;,,,:,..,,,,,,*.T.,'47,i',TA.,41,..:V,.,;,,,.:!'1,:..04.':,..'*,..,■=.,,,,,,,1„0,!q ''z3:,'':',,'''..'',. :•':' ','',:1,;!:,s,i'„,i,,,?, i,,,,,„„,,,,,,,‘,:,,,,,,,,,,,,,., t,,,,,,..,,,,,„,,,.„,h,,,,_ , ,,,•,,,I,,,,,i,i;,,,,t,..i;,1,,,,,,,,,;..1::::.i.,,i,,,,,ii,,,..,"!.,., t,,,,i,:,,,,,I:,,,,,,,,, ,,, ,i,,,I.,,:trii:,:i,,,,,,,,,,,,,..:,,,,,,,:tf.J.,:i,,,,!,,,ti,s,;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,t,;,?;.,,,;:lehlz,-,';'''," f.,;; ,0o?..;',.Y.;,'.;:4'''',3'1.-'1','). ,4,..A■t,",, '- ' '','4.-'21i"'"i.t-c''' ''''''''' !..,..i':,?..!.;,y,,',„;-.1 c,'',?,,i;;;',/,';;;.f.15:'..4.i''''.i:4,1,'.0,"-i.,,4-1,1t,',"•:a".'ik`.''';',.:"'''',';''';'''k''46:ff'';''tr;',',1,,','-'•''',''' .1.;'41-iA;!'''''',''' ':''-''''''":',411-1,",''''','','i''`,'''''',,:;V'-'4'''',4i:''' ":,',"si:';'''6,,-;:',;1,,,&,';'ic-,':, '`i.':..ir''''0,'.;"',';:i.7.,;.:1'''-','`.;:',';',',...1'''-' X),;:,,,-;;:,.:,:k,:',',,,f',,,'.' \ i'';'11''''''"f',';':ri'''''''','''', :',";il.'111(2'45i....i‘•.:,''' li:,r, ;1.. '.., :::,.P.A-c..' '-'1,:- '; ,,''.1:,:: .t.:;-::'''''''''''':';:;;7114:6). ''''''1'1:"":`;:1;'1":"''''''';'.;:1:4'ifY.::''''';':''':::,:fai:;'?"*.I4,2.,j';''',:;:tlid,",c';',,.?..4X'4:41,2;23..,).'eriikr.7:41:C.44, ..;4'...".'i:''''',"-:'''''.'...Vr,'.,f.,.i.,',..,,j'....,',.,;%7,;',1,,XYz7,i-4,:,.......,,,,,z..,t,,,t,;.:.1...,z-,,y,,,.,1,■.;;;;.n.,.,?.1'..i;',,-..-, . 'n. , i,,,,14,4';', ‘ ,,'N'r.,.,, ,,z,.1,..;;;;I'i.i,,,,1?)..,,i,,,:::1,,,44;'.4.:1■!::',.,'4,..1.,,'41 ,,...,.q.' , ,;',, 7.',4,,,,?,:4,7,,k,;1*.l'-'. 1'1,..,...,.;:i.'*,.' .:',1',-",',. '''-''‘ib"i4;:*%:';'';'i.';',';'''''':"'..1'.ill'Ill'''''''''''''rtr",''',- ..;:i'e:‘,'':'1:,'',.;:'''';';';'".."'').!:'',;::*:C;..'''','''''',''':7*'''',..i'.*':';;I:.^."'"3'C''.':1'',''''' ''''''''''''';'i''''''''.;'''' .'''..‘‘;:"i'''?''''`'.'.'7.'''''':, ' ". •' ,r1,, ,i4Er.i....:,,,,...,..v,,,,,,,,,. ,;.,.,,,,,i..„,,'. ,...4..,',f.11 '71.,..54''..4.1,14,...,1‘... ',..',.;'''C',..;,,',., I.,',..",it,4‘.,& .,',..;:',J.,' ,J,*,7.,, .'1', \'..,,A*, ',“.,,k1,47.F.,,i1:,,.,4;;;,i,.1,1',,,,...,:s.,;#,..,b";,,17't,,,r,p,,,,,-.,.,,':„.",,,(,,,,,..,,,,,.,,.:!,,:',;:f,,:,*,"11',.;.:1..)y.;,.:7.,..,.....1,,,,,1;',';',.;':::,,,iti:?,1,,f,:',7','.,.;',i.....,.:,7,:",".."7,!,,*.,.',..",,",',.,,,".7:1‘7'''',..7',('''itt,*.t,'.1,;,,,,:,',4,,i,;::.,-.-...t.,.s.',;;;.,..,4i;:. • ' ,,,..,',..',', : 04",).;:',,,',','-'1,.'''r131';?i',:',;,,4 ,,,,,e,',..."`%::',..''S'y''''f,,`,1,;<'-i"...";.?:.(.+:.,•)::',.-"si,','''''';1!. P ''''.y,'''.'::' '' :',1".,"1.4":..1"-'y'...''-'-',-,,i';',.t,A,.,;;I 4,•!.'',','''','',,,-, ..,!,','"?'".f.',',7„-..,,.,-,;,!;,r,,,, i1,1 .c ...,,...,'",....'.: ; ;'," ..." .., ..:.,,,,-,.', •-.,-;0•,"Li'; 1:!...: ,1-.1pi.i:,...t.;;:„;,;i:; ;,;ki,,,,,' -,'.1:tiy,/,:4,-;?,,ty.'T.,..,-.‘,:;'1.!?;; ;p,,,,,,,,;',.:!i;,,,,;"..r'.'2,;',i;',,',,';',.&;,;',"i;,,‘',;,v3,44.; .7'-;-,.;',,•;;;",,,ic,';'1-v;0.1'''.,,:', ,,, '..,i:4-1'1,'-,2: ;-.,t.,; `4,::',.r! '',1'..1„,',';,..',:;•;:i.,k,',',?!.:,':::,;',...''..".','-:.'''•;;',''.',';',',,:,,,:,,',.,'"'"i':'.,..-',,,..'; ' '''; ',",.'.;.:'..1'1;;;.',4,14.1.,,lls; ;, ,"':,.':, ..',11.4.' ;;'4.'':';''''''''.".' .:?,1:::,j;:iii;,,t1:.;tii,:t1,;''..'''.14,':',c.:,',1)''$fn,':'''-;•:'''':,*"..:4:':',;4';;;-:;:',:;:":11,c'''',;''',?,',:i,:,." , ■:',Iiij,, , . ,,'./.0,, ,■::", n .., , ,' ..i,,, ,;';'„::, ,4, ,,,L*Q$. .,;',;•;''.',1'01'....'.,,;,,,I.,'..,,.,,,,,,•,,,,,,,, ,,,,;......,%,..,,,,-,,„,,..47.,,,...;J.,..f,..,n.....,.;,,i::.,.., ,,,;...4 .;‘,..i.:. \\ .',;;:..i'::"4.;.'",.A:i . :"."'.",'''."'I:.'.','., :".'''''''.''...,:,.*;;;;;:k,.!';''',f,.:411e',.."7.,';:.::'''.'':4'.'.'"'::-..4.'''''''',!''.•''.;;':',''''',''''',:.'. .'''''''''„4::';':If.,',:;.;;..,.''fr..,,;i4,-:::,,`,',':;.;=.,.,; 'r.:,i4,e,,,,;,,,,-,-,...,,,,,,.:r.f,,,,iili,,,:,Af',..c.";;lo:11;-4,42,-1.ig:., .441,41,,,,';P,4x0. '• 'tiiie,:.i'l',r,r,i'iii`',',,,,:i.,`.',,,I;;I.J'.1.;r','',,:•;''.!...,',:'..',.4:',i',./i.'''',:,,,,,...i...,v.;;; ''„ ',‘:ii,'•'''.f'•:-*''..-''''"f'' '-'4i'i''' '•TIA.‘i, ''''5,' ' fAI!,46•biljl'A?it ,,f,gid..,1.,4`**i,;',111.,..1';:f7,...,„;:",,,I4E!'o,,6.0,,t1‘,;','.,•)!,,;',.' 1A4, ,,,,,,11;yr ,v1:4A0,,,,i,;A:.;.,,,,,3,,;;c,s,•?,,,,,...1:.-•:,•;',;;;[. .1,,,,,,,,I,,,,, ii.1,,,,,,,i,,,,,„,,.;.,,,,,;,,,,,,,,,i,,,y.,,.,,,,,:i;;,,,,,„, ..„...,,,;?,,,,,71, ,,,....,,q.,;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,;„:,,,,,,,,,,,,,x, ,:,..,,t,,,,pi,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,ct,,,,i,..41,,,,:-,t,,,,,,,,4,,,,,.;.:,•.,„,s,,,,,11,i.„,, if ,,..,,!4;s,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,5,,,,,,,,,,,,,;„, ,',,',,..,,,,,,,,4.141„vitt.,,.y.,,,,,,,,, ,,,,-• ,,,,,,,q,,F,,,,,o,,,,,A,,,,,y,c,,,....„,,4,,,,kA ,i, 4.•, ‘,.,.,e,.. ,,,,;44.0t..u''.::,,,, ,.;.4',.,-;,,;4'...;.,,r11',A 1If'fi..,,,)''•:, ' ` ',63,:,, ,,\•::,'.i.ItA,I,.,',,,,i,',./.:,,..',.td,',4') ?'•,','ir't,ilb',,,,,,.,:,/,'..t'lq,;, ,1'4•,,,i...,,,•4!;,,.,'..,,,,,,gq.,"?., t,•.:?0.... ite:1-•,.,f,.".ei:,,,e1,,, 'e. ,1', ',..,.?,.,.;::,:!',11,tv...,i;',':,T.P.,,,,,.f.t.,176:'!1,.....,,...,•,,,,,,i,,•1•;'••,,TV.r."4",',";.Pe,',,:p•,•:"?...1",'••fi'"."••••••,;?::,•':::•' `,',,,i•,....".•,,,,..;,••,ii•.:;„•:,,';,•:;•,;,4.,.1;*-7.:••,,,,;,?,,t-,::",.,t:' ,*,ti•:,,,C,,•:•;,A•i; •:•,•;:'t,,:,.,?,.'•,,'•••'''.;',••i •I•sf,,f•tj,•,,•,:"..*, ,FtH ,',3",,t.':•.".W:'';•'••';':;„-',';:i,•P•ii••••,;;;"-);'}'••ti•••ifii..fikii?4"4',''''''00•,';•t'l•h::"..,•i'•';"`,41,',',14•;,114'''''''''''.'r.',,.$.,,..,''',.•,•,t,,,'","';',..4, '':•,f40y,`- '1,'••;,' ''.:,;.,••••,...1,,,,":"•,•,,,,,,,":„.;,••,,,',,,-,),•.?,,s?,.1' e, ,;••'`W;,',';`,..,‘•,,,,:,,i',,.;',,''',,,b,,tii•'',...,'Ilo`k,i,C,:;;,*"41";4•,:i.r,t,:ii,::,24.,:4,,,•*,,,...,:••••„•,,,,,,,,1.1,,"...,,,•*1.,;',,,,';,,•,,t.i,t, . rd`;''''''':"•:;\'''''•i,•‘,..''t, WiClisi40.11•4'•',',•74'."'•ili.S1';'',:Th''''''•;";c '''''''''''''''''''''''''''••1.1`;‘'ki•'''Ailt•71:••'?"11 :4tihli,"7:•#.;;',1,,i,4"401';'4,•,';'is"•ZI. 't,;.';',,,,,•••;,,,,,),".'b ' I. „",*."•;,:•,*....;',.,"*.•;.,,,,.*,.:••;: .',1',+',4;'• ,,i,,",'•,•,,,",•,„,,•,, „ ,:t.:,•!';'t.,.....H.,;14,,,,,R;Y:ri4...%.,:,-..;,.40‘..,tiiy.,;,,:e.:?,..,4,,,,,I,;.„i',,,,;#1,1?t,.;:i' ',,,,,,,,;..,,Ii,,..,.,,i'„,..,,,,,,,,,,,,,,:: \ , ;',.7,,,i' „';'.,:,i''' ';',-If!,,',;;;;'''',,,"'; A1P,''-'94-1;,-.,1',';''',',..,';',,,,,I.t,'#1:,:-Y,'.';',17:1'..„ii`i34-0,1:'''',„,!'.1),i.'',.:"„,'",',"!",,,i4,:gi",;;(1, ."'!,'',,,'-,'','4"':',',;,:',,,r,',-,,. .,..',4' '''',',.,!':-,,,,`,*,'-,-,',,,;:fr.,,,.':."';'';'''''',":1:1Ig:;(",:;!:',,11..,,,,-1( "''''';,1,51,...41,-;:;i4 : t,\„",';';7'4'') ',41;t.,' '; ' ),;•'''',0`;;;;,!;":::..,''':',',':fi.''').'.'''';;'.'•;,', ",t.',;1'4i 11,,',.'',5,'1,11,1',;..ii';;';,,,4cf,';„'','";4','.;4,',,';',;cjil„,t;■",,F14/".'. -'',;','"!t,',,I..'../.1f;;:,4'.1`.Y.;'f,','',P,':.,':;:".Ter,f';,P,1144.'2.,,''1;''A..`i.qt.';'.1..:;';,it'■...t'''':'/P,''';'to'`Irtdil:..';;I:i., ; '...'''''';;;'.''''s ';.'; '''''''.,' 4";1"."`;'''':;;,04;:',,i'-'74!,;;;',.1;44:.',,',41''c':,;),,4■,,',;,,,q1",,,. ',,,7.,,;,'.,,,. _„.;4`,,t,.1.1., ." ,1" 4,1 ;'Y,',;,4,;').';fi;17'..'?.;','..";j*,'". J.. :"14;',..,;,■;.{4:1',4'...;;;"'+'.,'PZ:i,it'''','....,'",',4',,,,,,fg(!'4401:11;, '''''''A!4'l',„7,44,t4".`.,.;) -1,...' 7.,,,;;,,I.,,:. .-,' ' ' ,. . „'-',„1;,';,,.„,1 „;,,„;,„;,„..,,,,,,,„'''.4'.14z,;,'„,0,1s,,,'''''.../.'.*4:',”,l''....',,,t,?1,,,tik0,?,k,,,,f,',,,,..i,,,,,?',,,,, ",..,.,,,,,,,,,',,,;,.;t rf.,:;,,...„,..,•,..,„'..,,,,;•,...'„, ,lip,,?,'..,,,, ,..,,,,,,;-",,,,p,,,,,,.p„..c;',..., ,,,min,;,,,,,...'...,,,,,,,,,,....■,.... ',1,,,,,,,,,,■,,i .,•,.441,14,4,444,..*•••0,...6,•,......'...".............. . 1!,•7 ..,■•,','ltf.,,, Y'7,'PA:,',"14:), ,"''•'.' •'4.:, .•,-,4,,,,P,,',,i,, e .1,,,.....,,,,..),„,..,,, ,,,,, ,,!ili,-.:.:,,,:.,•.:,,..; 9,7,. .i;....',. ',,. ',,,:,,,' lip.,''', ,,,,,,,,.,...,%''.•,.11,',..,..-:',.i.,:.,.....•,•...,‘,.4,..,..,,;,, • , ....,,i..t.,',!,:,,,• ., .,,,,,;i;.,..:,ir•.,,,.•:,,i,,,,c,,,e,,,,,,,,,„,,,,,,,,..„1,,,,,,;044,1,,.,,,,„„,, ..7•.,:.,.•..,-,..;'.... ,' ',1,..,1,,,IY;...rp;...:,;,§,'Li.'',1.:'i,',c,',,,,`..'',''''.4i,'",,,4','"i''4,,—'i,'" , . '•,4,..,';,,_,.: ',-','`.?...,..'•. 44,,f,i,4::,•.',..,t4',41';41',Y)'''.'!.*';';'14',.$4:1,;',';''.ftl,,J:f , ,„,,,,,,,,,...„,„.,,.. . ‘•,. •i'',,,.:",,;'*`;;;.. „., , ,,,,Iplipn '.'','7',.7...''.7,.,7 7‘,■ ';';',7'1,';',,,,':,,,,ii,,,,''',. ',' ...417,,,e. ,,,, 4 I' PI•li,..,r1,...• , ' • ''':1.,''''' ''.:';':•:*;1;‘;'17,'''''' '.'t,';';',!,' ',;"?.,i,,,'.,7•''i•'" r')", '4, 33 '*,.•:•:,,,,,,,r1.,,,,,,,)•,,•,,,i0,,"•,.,,,.1"k,,••,,•,*.,..„,,,,,',,,,,.',",..,;•;.",••,,I,,,;:,i*,; ;. ' • '''':- it.:'. ...;•'''''' •iii ,',',•,1,•;::',?•(:•'•!::,• •yell• •'.`,,,i.:•■'1•1',ii•: • ' ttrilex‘ NO' 3635 '4$,,,,, '",".,•,:),,':',..g.,1•1 ",'•;:;fit'',;',,,,'"''• •''.••.• ,, .','„,-,,,","*:'••,;.•;"",i.*;',.. ,•,/,/,•••,;-•.,`,1•',If*,;,+1••,;,4■,,,,,.,.,17,,T,' ''',',,,,, .., , •, , .,.: '.,',:tif';',,,,t,,,-4r *V.,,,,,,f1,, r,'''..,',,,',"',"riPt1.4'.''',,',',1'''.., ' of a ' 1 ' . .* ',1";14*,,r.;''''''j,","*'',,,',...7.4,■91,!!!,:i'7,.,'",i,,, ' '.",., :,i0LIY''':?TiX;i1.0"I,,'.1:''' ' EXIII:BIT A• , , ' ' ' , ri.'•,!;/,'"..'''il:',g4::,,',1' ?;',"::i1.:4:14:t7"'"1:!",!'•. ..,':H% i ,,•' •• ••.,• • •,,,•1",•"t,;(;,•,t;- •',?ki,11',.„4",;1v , t,,i4 •••••,1 1 Jr' . ,.o.,,, •••••+'•0.',:r,',,,,,,,,,i;/.,.i••,, ,c'4"'","1,•;,/,'"`;,,,q,...•••'1".1., •.‘,.. •, ,,....,,,.,"';• "•''',, ''',..;6:."4:',',,,,itgi;,' ',"4,1,•,,,,'.'4-,',!.A'?,,,,,./,.';;;;:",,,1".'1,•f.ri"".:"i";f: ' That part of the Sou thee e t gtiar ter of 8 e cti,:•,,n 330 ll't.iaciaathip 1, ,,t, ..,,.•;jr,•,,i,J.,^,,,, .,,,,c,•,_,,, ;,4.•,,i;;:,,,,,,,,,,,:,,,,,i;.!•,,,,,, .,,, ';,•'•'1..•...,•'',';',; ',.,;'',•'4';'''''',.,,""i* 1.','•1:0;te,,,'"!•'',1',"••'•:‘`..)•C*•'-•''';i,'•:::'', Son t h, Range 1 West of th tfi 1 le met t e 'Meridian, in the City of '41:4P1t,r ':,, •T,:•,',••,,,•;•••,:*,,,•;•' ', ,.,411:!401:4,,,if,.",:' " ' .• . ,, . , .. ',•161.,,s, • •,,,••o,,•-,- ,.. . ,•:'—%, ,,,,V,-114, ,0,%,„ Tigard, County of Waahingto0 and State or Oregon, described aa " •. r,...4,,,,, , 4„.„0.,,,,,,,,,,,,,A,1.?, wit'.,,,,. e,,,,..*,,.'!*;',...;', . •■..• y•4•.,,,;•!'..,,,',..„i,,t..•74,'",,,,,',,*t.1*1■*". ' **' ' ,., •',/''•,, •,'"'".1;',*„.**)';+t:',.';•*',),.1":,,i,i.,,,,,,,,li,.,,,...,,.,,,'.y.t,i,,,,,A,A.,,. X 0 li.0114141 I , 4,...,.4(.',.',.' .,,,,,";,.;:',1•',lift:1,11:g, .,.\ ,4,t,4,i,f,r , ! , ,..„,,,,,,,,,,-;-,,,'It,t.,--,,.1.,,,,.-..,,,,,,oi . '.• v,',11:4,',..'":',.'e '';''',1fP';;'.'i-',%''';-:;"'i 4.','i'-'1'/,'Y'''''',i,i,''.; It der lilartirt g at the intthr n action of th 4 Raster ly right of %/ay line ' 4;;`;•.•",.",",(4"1,,,,'",•,*,•r" '',-:,,,;:.,1"..*•,,,' • ,'•;•,'•••',....'••,..2'..,..: i:•'.i,,g,,,o/:1';:l.'3'.•;';''',1,,,,"`')'.,:*'''''!•.,4,:,,,i''' , '' "'",,'"f„.„ Of County Road No, 812 at,.41 the 8 sat lira* of the TS out h w e a t quartet :!•,',.': '•'''',4'4,":1,"';'•'•."''..,i•• ''.. ,*4,4.4' . , . ..,..','.40; ...,,„,:, !,",,-,„''• .,...,,,.,..,..,:,'g""':,,..:4'-,-.7. ' , , a lt t ta 0 Ocean/tee a t: qt.ta r t e r 4..If section 324 %"0,01%eniP 2, Son th, It st1136 1 1,'''',,';''':"•;•,.1';'''''4.,,,,'!1:',1'')'''•;!•.,;4r,11.-::,..,"•.;i:'''',''','"1,,,;•.,1,;.'"•I;;;1,- , , :. 3.,14,5:01:, ,,. V,..,,l;'•"N ' ' Wait Of the Willamette Nectdian? said point of beginning being i,!,,,,,w,,k ,i,.,,,:i.,,.„,,,,,,,,,,e,..,,•,....,7,t,,,,, .:.... , .,v', , .:Al.,",„.,"....,,,4'i'.',Li...,:,.q,,,o,,,.,v„,:-.1.,,',,'.4 ' ' 4 kicriAlA •. ' .'. °, '.' 44' , 4It'-',°'+4:A1J, ' 202,48 feet, south 0.18' WO 6 t. of the Northeast corner ot the above ..)..,,,,,;,-,...,,.,,,,, ,,,, ,..,,,,,...',,,,..1"r, . . 4'''''' ' '';' id 0 thy 0 t cxttar ter of the 0outhwest quarter of 8ectior4 33? ," • ,•!:•••4,,,•,'•;•'.*,,"';:1`,:*,,‘••,.„.,.,•&*;•;:11,,• '. ;• • .; •••''•'*'' •';';',.V":•,',•,-, •-•."' ,,- 'f',"',*,=*r "0:T4'4,;4•••2i tat au 6 .•';: ',.•; • :," ..sc.'0",* '''',4",, ''','''''' ''''_'W t h e rtc s Sou th 0*18' w e s t 0 n t 14 e s a s t 1 i n e o f t h e "3 041 t h w e Is t (au a r t e r ' ',4:4,•1'..,1!r2-'12.":1:,'''.:,,•/'',.••;:,::,(1:",'1,l';'.,•;',,;:':';';''''''';'''I'F',....'1:!''','' , ,,,es.e.„.• ,,,,,,44,-.,:•,.-4.7., ,,,,,,,,..-,,,,,q.,,,,,,,1, • t- 4it",:,,41:,,r+7,?,.,4;.,..,t, elf the 0 out th we s t quarter ex Secition 33, 520.96 feet to a pe4 i n /, ,,,,,, ,,••,,r•-•,,,,,,,,.4;4,,,•,,,,,,•:,;11,,,,,,,ti•,;,, •• • • , • .. ,,,■,..1.::.&'!,..44,,,.,,,,.:4,,‘.,,),.p74.. ,„1,,,,,,.;..., ...„ . /.1'''''4'''''''''''''''''''ot'','''''+' '"','''''''PN'''';.1 thence North 89.42, W t 334.48 f eat to ed, pot st int on the Sa te fi •iright r ly itgii,f:',:g4t,•.•.,i",11,..'1,`2,.;,"•Yr,,5"ti,fil..a,, ,. ,• ''''' :•' .' .' ', ...'"J''',‘",;',',',`?::: 4'''''''''',-.4;11;',:l.l'''',.14:,;'4:1-',':i."1,,;1'.i)?1,''''''t i''''," )•"',/ ' ' e f w ay 1 in e o f Ro 0.d No, 8124 33*00 4 ' ';,4,,,;4.1,,i,t,,.,4A1,-,•„,,,,,,14••;•,,',1,.;,,,,,,'",*,,,,..:'1,,!tz,;*,!,,.•••;,,,,i,•*•,,,,,„I'•0';,..;..,,:i,,,,,l,i.iT.;',.•:1 ..,, '•,,:.• ;'.,,„,,,,•:".t. ••.;.,:*,..i. .,,,.•,••;•,,,,,,,;,,,.;;•,,I;Iti,.,,•,,,•..*,,i';',,;,..,',,,77,., 1 ,8 a 1.1 t' on Ateit2 Sateterly line of eountx r•,,•144, 619.08 f est to the 14,„••_",!y;;;ii,,,,S,!1!'i;,,f•••;rp,•,,:•;.:1-4;1•,-,,,:f*4 • "',." ''' '•: ' '' !""P‘•?",••••,'•'-',3,',.,,,,,i'•••,."•,,,,,,,,..,±4.) ,,;•••;, , . .'•' •-•., sit•''4'"'-';'*•,,•••#t•'1,i*,','-4111','.I'i,^1.*,Ii:144,,,..1"I''f!', , point of be ginning :?....,-,,,;',;•1,1•,•;;Af,iT,;,..,,;',,,',•,,,,;•!•• •,`,1,,,)•.,4• ;•,,,!,,,,,o,fi•,,,,, r,..•• , •••, .: •,:,*";.•,••„,,,,,,;•,,,t,,l'I'•*••I'L,••••,":•••;:ti,,,,,r,•11••,•.',,,,.•.,*, t•c•A• • , ' 1 • 7';',"■•• ..4,',0:?;',."'i,ik•?1,','•'.. ';'••'• , •*, ,,' , '. •,*,•::-•••4;••••,,,,I;'••,,,,N.,•:i•:',g,.;"`i,,•4,,, ,,,,„r.:••■•-•'4,■••,1,-,,‘ "' .4•,7,,',•,,4•It,,.••,;,-"t",,,,I,'.,,',"•••••••f•!3'••i'e '‘,!!4-, •' • ' '• •':',•••:•• 'iii,',.,,,,,,,jf.1-'9'.,'••1'1,':b4.,,,*;;;;;,i;•",•;4"•',''`.,:tc.,••••fo,i.,•11/,'•••• . ' ' • ' • • ' '..:?1,ve,4•",•••',!..,••.„-`,,;,,,i'd•;,*,,,,,,**'1,c»,",f•ii•,•,*:••$, ?•'•••• .' .'•'•',::'1" ',1,ii,11•,-,1.+•.';''',•"•A'',IT'L),i.,'••;')','P'f'','"',1,,•‘"'"ii5,•'•'''','',1''••,' ' 1 ' ' ' "•'",',!±.41''';''',',;f:,',,':!*•1'.10,;',:.•'''.:::%.:i.'4 ,•:•ii.'ir ' n ' \ .,i,,,,t14.,r,',,,41/,:;,,k".";`,",,:rs.::',i•°:1;!;.:,:',;.A.',,,i,f,i,,,,,,,,..4 i'''. ! ' 1 ,V;;.11',. '' 4'„,,:;': :;','?,.;,..1'.',' N'!t':','tig:::',, i,r,':!' ,',':. -*::,*;,;,,-,.'.'!„,'',,, t;',,,',,,O.i.,',,,,;,,,,k)i',4Lic,',''s!.','„1.,-!,:,,-,.',, wil ", 1 , ,...,','";,,*0!`14,'3,',":'■,t';:'', *t'I...•',,'"':,";';',.,'.'"':, '. ... . 4v,:,,,i.P,,1';,,,t,,i,;,,,I.,l'ql,',',":3,..,,,;;',., ,L" ,, .44, ,,,;‘,...,11'+#''''...,;',,.:1,,,,,..;',.; ).i.,,...',,",..7„, , , , 1 ' ,,,iit),:i...all.'',"1'',..,:t.,,,,.,,,,,,,-,1.,!,,,=.1.,(1.1,.:,;.,- 1,e.,,,,,i,..",.,..'.„:,"?...,!, ,,,,,.,,,,.,1i.,1.,,,,,. ,,,:',,. 1,.,,T:'311.';....',;,,,',.'„,.',,,,44',.,,,,ri'''''',.,', -., 1 ' ''.'''.' ';'.;'1.1:","''''',?,'''',i:11.:''..;!!,'4''''.,',,:','":1''..';',";"''''','',,'!:,'1,','' 1 '.•.: ,..,....; •,:.',:t',..,;., ,,,,,•.1, ':: ,' 7, ,i,,,,,,:,,,7,,.),,J,:Ii '.44,„, 1 , 1 ' ' 1 ';',;:.,,...;.,1%•:‘,„).,;,.,.,.,,,'‘.t.,'„,c-..,),.,:,:.:Yr,,,,,,,,,,,,,v.,'.,. „ , .'+'. ,•,' L,. '.,... :;..i,.i''.',.411.':.•,si,'':,g,i',14,,';',',ii,'iTY4't.''''? .,..'!',';',',.:,4'..,'."- .i.",, , , !i'..,.';',,'''t'i':,'''',''.;,,-;',',*i';',‘,..,*.:';,:',',";;,',,;',''..,,',,,'„,i. V,:;:vc,,'. .:1,:',L.:",::,V, ' ' ' '1'.'.''','..„,..;''',';,:;1,,';',6',1,1!;','.'''',1,7,:',`;':d';''':','.'..,), , ,4,t!., :1,,;'..,;;;;?,.';',1''..:;.'li. ,.j'," , , , ;',. ",'.. ' ',..'';',. ir,,;!-s,;,:',,, ,)".ei. ''''''':'''';'':; '''''' '''',;''''''*; ''. ,'5,,, +".;;;;;;'1,4%;?,. -,`-„,,''".4 , ' , ‘`...:ii!;:i.,i'•):4,:',.f!:;',4r.,;?,,t'if:..''.-','''L'f',..f!,'...,': ', -.•••, ,,,;,,/,,7',,:',!,,,,,•,;:;';-",=.,,,,,,,:,•,..,:?...,,.' r'..:•',a'!;'`.;',;';'),' '2',;',';,';',1,,ii',,,I;ft,:c.j!".' ,',",::',,",:""'''6ti,,-"cy',, , ' ' ' 1,'"'"1.-,'.,-';': ;111„ ,,,°:,,,,!,,','„”, , -','•_ ;40'',',;1,''.',,",;;'■,!';','qi';',i'.:"' ';''''''',1,:fl''''f'tt;',1 ' 1 9/ATE PF 013643014 .4';'i.,;';'.';it,';....',:,,,/,'Iii.:k:.',:,i,r,,,;',',,'',1,!,;;i1,,,,',,. .• .•.. 1;;‘,'si'.'",;.;1.-.1..,.,',1.1V, ..,1,,l',;,p1„'.,'.,ii,,:t.,,l`„,!,,,,,4,1..4,,,,,,',,,.i;'.'-1.7.'?;1'14,:',....:;,.',"; , . , 1 1 ss „,...flii,?;,i,'",,,T.i'4';',';',f,,;'''';.";:',;'.0A.f,'''',,i;,;;': '• ., .. . , ,,,,,,,t„;;,, , .. , , , County of Wat.nitigtIon ) .,.,' ' "*„” '‘,.°,1;',,,,....,-.".",;,',I6:",,,,'`'.`;'-r,',.,i ,,I,,i'i;*',,i' . ,,, .4. 4",..;..'',, .';'..e.‘,.;.I), r!'r.,1,'..ii '',rfi., '' ', ' ' ' ' I ttOtiald VI Mil$041 Dilertiti or asse%slr,e,at '.:1;•':?,',-,''•‘-'::f-1144,'''''"•'•1:':,:lr'''',''',",''••••i,''';';'','''•''''•,*'''''',!; ' h,,,•,,,,,,,,y4„•,•,,,,,,•) ,,,,,..;,,,,,,,...,,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,i,,,,,,••:,,, ,,,•••4 '*4"1 and't axalain and Ex otf,t10 Ao,,,ordnr Of 1,,,,:,..,ti,01..,,,,,..„.r,.,, ,., '.,4,r. . , , , . i'''.,:li:',.';',,,l','..t'''':''."i'.!;,':'...■ r"'.r,l'i,,:.0..,4,0,-,"1,1'14:41;,,'1,.Clir'41),IA?I',''',.''''''',,,,,:'.'' ,.,,..,,,,I,;\:, ' ' ' tvhflaYavoA'11°h'itn°Ina''17:14rn*txxint n(4;1 Zitoright'r°by/YaaceiToeitY 1■!thi'41 .',",;'',.',.1■,,,4%'-';','?I( ; ;4k;',:.,:ie,;;;:i,',',.,' N,,,,A , , and tocoittad al bdet of t000nis of oard.counl,, . '.,, ,, ,,''.■• '„•,: kt",.'-',"? I'L'''.-',:.,`'.'0,'',T. 'i.'''.'4,..... 4',.'', , . , ir,.3, .,„,.i..,.. 'I's . Donald W !Anon Owoeint IA ',,,,•:•••*,,..••••c.•,4'•„.;41,4,,ii,,',,,1.),.*, ••'•• . .• 4.! ,•1,.•:„. '.. ., 4,, ,,..,'.:.4,•;"1,-1.. ;',',,i..,..' p,`.-,,,'g ' ' ,aett,..-r„0,,1 end TA ti. .',".•f,':,;',;',1.'.'.'''.';',''.';'..'71,74.:‘,..'`.:?,i . '''. 4,,'!,';''''4 ,, ,',",1-1."',',,i' . $;."-,-:ii'',! ';';'1 , , ' otittio County 00*"'c'" c" -',"‘,14';',4.'"Iii{,,,i....'ei,-,"".44-i!''''141,,,'''',;.; ' 1"..6';,.....,' pi' ,,,f4, , t.!,,,,. , 7,•,..,./,-,",.„!'1.,.,,,i,,., , '' . ,,,...".. ,,, i:,0,,,,,,•, • . , -'..,•,i);.-• ', 11,i,.i.,,.,,r4.1.,..,,,,t.•'.,; k. ,,,,4 , .. .,.,,'. .. .;',,i.;...,1,...*-',..'' i',..,., 'i.;.:;.:;■;,i.;,,:i"'0,T..'.;".; ',..''...; , ' , '.4.':.;,c,',!..‘,.i.i.'.;;;?4"i.P.ci,i'l'A''','.'','!,,'„; ••• ' l',...,,,0',-,51,,;,,,,,;:,,,"i..; ifi''1 r '''1' ,7t1i,r,'..:;',,,,,91!,,,l'i,';;",,I? t:•: :'''.,'. .,.,',,,,,..,tiii,„•,,,•,,,:qq, ,'.1.,'7,, .'.•"•;„' .:,;•••:, • , , , • ,-,,,,,,•.••;,,,,,•„,::;,.•,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,..,,,,. ..1,,,,,',,,•;,...,,,.,,, .‘,„••,, , , ,,/, ,,,,„..n,,,/,,,,,. ,,,,,',",i,4,1,,,,F4 1 , , ,,,, '1,i 4..'„f„1:4:+,,.1. 11' „'.!T'','...*..'"C;;''''''.. ' , ' . ' 1118 SEP 20 41110:4 6 :f'', ,''..T,',,i:,..;,;:,.`,,,i' :' ;.t, ,3",'',..i. ' ' y ..1, ''',...',' -.,,, 0.. ,',',',,,,,',f,:',.,,,t,,,,,,'7:,,,t.,",„',,,,,,•.:.4„,,,':', . , d.,,t•,.q••,,1 d- ,,., ,,,,,,-,,..•'f 7- ,1 .,',`,,,,-.'...,7".7 I ,'■''',..,..0 1,7., i.,',,,i,,r,,L....:. $.,r.' , '..'',,,'','',.,..*,,,,,'"'..46,f,l'''''';',:.'';'•,'.'',..,,7, ' ' l'',„,',..7..!,,,,,, ..'*.:•'',.U.t.''''.0.',:*,:*,,' "',1',..`'''''!.'•4,';,.,;,'',:-.',■:',,,;•!,.;,,,',I, ,,,,,,,'';',',;;.i',,'''',.'i : .1.',.',i,:i',„:.,.;,),',,,:::.741,#4,7','":',',7,4,',1,„;',.;''..,”' % .- 0,4n ,. . ,,,, ,..,.. . '-1:,st,,..,, c.,,,,,., ,',. -: ,, ,......,.,.-.,:,- .,',''',.,.....,''•' ."':', '';'''',''''''',,'',".'', '':•',.„,,,, ,h;k:.,,,,".,,,,,,,aI:,, ./,,I:„,-'.,,, , i.,.,,;...,,,,, ,I.:'..;..;,'..;.•, , , .,:.;.`,''';■r,'''.f.'''''''',,11.'i■.:.'',f1.''P .' ..:•, 'li r 14,',7,:,,*,,r.,*,...•" ''•„,,,',',,,i,,',littic,•,'720r,•,•ritt r?:,,,,,o,wi, 4,,,,,',, r, ', •"• ,--,r,'',,,t•,•rp•','"•'.'''.;'•''',•,'-4'.-r:0,-,„•,...;•:,'-T,',•,! „,,,,,,,•„;,:1,•,,•,4,,,,:'0,,-,,,,,,,•,,,,4;,.trt,.1../,,,,A,,,,M,,,,,,,,g,,,,,,,,:,,,...,0,,.,,,,,,,,,,,..„.,c,;,p,,..,,,,,,',,,,,,,:,,,,,.,.„,,,,,,,...;,!,,,,v..,..1,:.,,,.0„,,,I,,,,,4,,,,,,,,■.,,;,,,,,,,,,,,I.,,:..t.,,,,,,,,......,,,,, '.,'' ,,,'4,',.."..t.,;;',"',;';.' .;4...';',';:';''i'tt,i'',..:'-',r,i'.4,.'t•L'.. ''"'.'':..;',r0;;4''.'''',.'.;,,.'',,'.','',:.'',''""..'\;;',..;,"'.•!','',":1'.';;',.','`..1';',";.-":""..., ,,,."1'.1.•-,.lir'''....,,,,';',.I.,.,'.'',,,,'.,r 4,‘•::-4r;,',',$14,,,,,)'1,4:-';'.!. ,,:,.,,4:!.. ,,• E.:',,,,,: ,, , ,,, , . ',,..i..;:,,,.,,-,•.,..',,*..4,,,,,,,,,,,„7,,,,;,,,,,,,,.4;,,i„,,,,-,,2,,,I,,.,,;-.,..4,,,,.,...,,,..2,;,..,,,,..,..,,,,',•,.'''','''''''(4 .'• '• ',.••• •«,"•1,,iVe',••:',;',••• `;.•'', ..'''"•'',*”:li,',•';•,(!:',',,,,•,!r,":r.i,,l':•"..,',''„! „ , , ,,"?`, ■',, , „,1'4,1„,t-'.. --,V,"tr,?,'.., ,i'4,,,;•-,,,y;,'1,,,",..-;`,1,-.,,,,.,,:i.7.,:,,,i,,,,,,,vi,;;,,,,,,!;,..,:;-,,i,3!.,-.=-4.,,-,.-„, ,/,,,,y: ,,,,,,,i,t,”;,,;,4,11?, .,,,;',,,,4",',"''. j.,"'..,:,,., ,,,,,,,,,,,", -' , ',,,,..'„,,',",":"!.‘;,',.4,-i';;,t,;":,,,,i,'",,'7.01,-'';."4,":.71;',21y,;-"'.-4:;,1,,1- ':',',i,'-';''',11,4','",'..j''''''-',',i1."?-,'&1;',';7ri'14,-'4',""..4 ' ',i ' "'f''"4:-' '?:i"," ',',',,'",..:i';'`,`" ';';',-..,,, . ,,, ,.:.‘,,, ,;,,,,,,,,,?.,,i,:,:,..t.:',..;,,7i:y., '4.,.',,',7, „ r,..,,, ''',;'„ '*.,4;,;,Y-Ali:...7,1 ''.7., ..','1..0',, -,-,, : :,. .,.....4,-I,,,, i. .,,.,:;,;,,,,,p,,,,,„,;„,„.;',,;.,:rj,,,'...,,,',-,■,;;,;.",,'",;!,`i'....,,,-,,',.J.:';.;.,,,•:;;,,',•;• ',. 4,•,..,;:".1!:,'-:•;,iq,'•'4;141,:,;,,,,t.'„•,.1,1:•";*.;;:'•,'4.'","."..,,I..i';,`ei,i'',":,:i•ii:.,,,,,•:4•.,4';'';,.,;';';!'i,',',t.,','::•',`:',"..':,::'''•'1',•'',.,1..", "q r'' ',,i.•:,.i ,„c,•.,,r,,, ,,,1 ',,ft,',' 'I'#yi,,, ,.l'; ,,t...,!,,'!;*!,':'.;,"*.,,r,,,,',.„-,,r',,,,-,;‘,■'.111,.',*!6*,`,. 1,•I'',I',',*',''' '',*:.=".1"17,'.*:*,'„''',.';',f,,, 4%*,.,'4 , ..7,,,:;',;''',."4,.1',.4,2.,•:*,i''''..,',I'i,l'Ir',IIIL'''',".",q.',I.*:`,'',,,T,11;11!'li.:*i!et,-,:i:i.!;;`.rfi;44;',..,i':,.",;',.,;,:,,',',',',I.,',,,"..:.';':',,.,'•!,',',^*■,;,;',,it„:,,,?..",';' ,'', 'i,i; ':.'''' .),*t't:4", ,,t,'"'1*;';''.: .1'' ' Oir.,',."':' .4''''''''g A'''; :,;.''40.,''‘.''' '1'','14,k,''.,..-',',.,'"`I.'' ',:;',,,,i ■,4-:$1',,Y"',4 ::',',;,',.`',1'..;;,=',4",;,'.,,*1';','!.';:,',,,,"1,').*:.6";,.',',:f1.-...:', ,,. .,",41rt.'; , ,'',,, 1,.."'-'4';',,,",„‘-,'',,i'tii.1.;:';',. ,, ' ;i, 'I,--i,,..; ,':' ;,:0;.'',.ii',1,'''':,.;',":,.' t,,,14'.',,",,,', ,,'i.,',,,,,.'4 P.::',,......., I,:,:',;,L,,r,;'!,i1,...i':',,,:l',':',',101",i44',''''',,'t,',,,,''',;',, ,,;40';.k.,,,,,;:'''f.'',1:,`,';',z,':',';'.',,,,:‘;',; 'f-i',,,..':' I '.'''.'.,,,'.. 't',10■*',. ,.,,.., .,....'...4,4'1.1., ',F.,5.,*(,ti',"! ,4if!,',*,!I,' .,,"".„,,, , :,:,'„,'i,.,,-,..*.ti","",:-,'.; ..,*r*,,,,,,4 ''''.1',...,.,14 ;1 ' ''.,,,,,17*,,41,,,,i.,1,,**,,,,' '..4,*,:',,',,, .,,,,,, ',.',,',','7,ry.....):4,*.i 1,,,,i,,•;,r,,,c.1.,!/,;',77.4,,,,:,''''.',''1.•,,,t,,,,,i',,',,,,,7.,.',' l'.,',7)'7,,',.`,..7.A''„'7,,,„1.• . '''''''"''''' ''' '''.''.'' '''.rtl'11 '''''''i''''' ''14''' '''''''''''''''''''' .')'' ' '' '''''''.'" 'I''''''' '"'i'''''''..'''4'.4.-'4'''''''",■';',!4'"''''' '' ''..., *1',e,k,C,'4,',,,.1',.4',",1',.1.,*.',.„,.',4!:;. ''/■'!",-?,'",*'.."..-!:,,,.'f,,ii.:*:','.,.' ,)47i;,,,,,,,'5-;•:,','.',4',7,?'.7',,,',', '.'-''', t'i',.'4,.,'''.. . '',.''', ..''''',:;.•-,.74'.L..1''',.',''''''',,,i'ill',1, l'.1.'''''',.,',',., ,,',;-*''. ..,.; ,. ', ,'"7,:. „,,,,,.1,1;7),,:.,,,,,,,,i,•, -,..'t,,1:', ,,,,,4.!,..,, ,,,i,,,,,' ,......,1: •,,.' ' ' , ,,;•,: ,,,,,":,,,,F,,,,,,..,,,:1,,,,,,,..,.„,,,:,;,,„..:.,,,,,,, t•,,,.;",;,„,(;•.,.::.'1"„.!,.;•f;.,,ii...,i,•;::;..'•,;,',1„,,,,-.,,,,,. , ,. le 4-„ .-.,, r .,,,i '-..n,, ',' ,., ',,i',.”' ;',,,...,,,' ',..,,,*.,.",;',.',..','v,. "..;''":'‘;' ,„,',, . ',',,,,'', ,'''.'t,..1', ;ii.''.1;' 4,, ,',:', '. '..1':!'"' '''..,'n'':li,,,,,O,'1,...;',,•!;,, :"'.f.*"r''1''+'11,,,,,',';`;":.'4,1,1;',+.':.;",:;,':',t'','''..""'f,',''''f,.1.'''",,.;.,,' ;',.'!,;!:....f.,''''''.:',/,:1:1'''.;:'''.1.',';';.',.1'.;'''.1',,,I711.',!..'.'".'''::1:,:::. ,til,d,..„,,,,..ii,;,,,,i,,,.,,, , ,, :,,,,,, .,,,,,,,,,,,,i,.,,,,.,,,,,, •,.,,,,,7,,,,T,,.:r,r,,',:,1,,', ,‘,,,,,,,,'1 ',,,,j,,!,.,'r,,,.,,,, .',,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,7:,1,,,,,\ ,L' '.1.,,!,,,,,,,,,„,,,.i,,, ,,1,,,.,,,,,,,!,,,:,4,/,',,,,,At, .,, ,‘,., „,,4,, .,„,, ,,,,,■,:'0,4.,,,,:,, i, ,.,,,;.,1,,,,,,4,,,,i,,,:i,,„,,„,,,,j,..,J;,?:.,,::,,,:,.ii:i..,,,,:r„,,,LL.,,,,i.-L.j...;.,1,,,.1,1.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ..,■,^3::,q,,,,,r,,!„.k.,....1 i ”, ,*,,,, ,1',:,i',, ,;'''''.'" ...14, , „',,,.. .'...: ,,',„ , .,. '". .,,,,,,,-.:"''"' ' ' ''''44''',,4,,,,''.:)`..,',!..F0'"),.';',;:',; ,,,,,,..:,,',.-4,)",:',,;';,1;:".A.,I:,-;,,',f L...;',...t,■;1'.;,'7,,i';'',, i',7..i.,:,",.,., "',;''''',1;4'.,` ‘:''''„.1';!.t,..,,',.;,*..;17. ' ' ' ' ': ',..,.,44'''',:ti:W.,' ',.'4;i't,:!,,,';',L'I".:',,,''.11',.'*'1.,,,', 1.1,,,,;,,,.''''..,,,,,,,,,,,,,.4.';',....',,,, :"::.'1' ''.;,.„',.,','" "„''',.. ,-'''.;.',''''" .;,,,::,.'',;,:,:::',',4',',:i,:''',I',1,„''','',,C,":11;5'.'Y'',1":"'"j',''''''''.''.',','''',1`;':','",,,'.4.'''‘,";,';41i'l .,: ,: ,1 ; 4*14,' ''• . - ^ ' '; '' '',,,'''.-' :•":•:.00, ,t•,. . . , ,''•,- ,i':.114,-,',,,•,I•i.--,-,..",,:,',,,'47.,'-,-,,-,..,,,..-,,,,':.',,:,,,',.;i"riix.'..',, ,,•,.■,,,,,,,,,f,i.,:l.::,,,,i.../..:,,... . ,,„, . . ,-..; ' ., , , , ,,, ,, , L. ,, ,. ,, ,,,,, , •,,,,,,;'!,."-,•,,,, ,,,,,:,,,,,,,,l',.',,,,i,',"':,'"'",,'',',''''',.'•,:e,,,V',',37•;',..,.,',•,!i..'',':,''.1';',' ; , ' • ' ' '' ''''.'"' •' ''''''-•''"'''.;-''''.-' ' ''''' ' ' -,- '.-,,,-'.--,,,1,' '."-,•'"-4,:::,....”,:,t,....,','::',/,,:",,',',c.,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,,•,-.,,,,,,,,,..-5,,,,.,,i'.•t,...,,,,',..,":;,t,,,',.:i.',!,,,,.to, ' : , "V.',?'-'4 l'...„,'l'.. . ' .' ,' ,'' *', '', , .'' ,.....,.......4,,,,,,,,.w..-4,14...,.'4.'i •,' ,4'i,i,,,.' ,'',,,, liti,.....,,,,,,,,,I.,,...,.. , , , , 1..,,.„,„•.......,.. .-. ,....., , ,,y,4,1 - • - , .,-....,',..,,,..,':,,,,..s..,.t.4,...,,-,.....•.-..,,,,,:.:„..,,ic,i4,,,,...:....,;.,,,;,;4...-.;,,.....1••,,..t....Y.,,4.-,,4..'i,,,.,.,:.;..i'.,,.,,,,,. ,,,,•:..,;,,,... ',. ,.•-.••-•,..•',. .4.'.,‘ .. ...'.. : ..,,;...,..'. — :: .., . . .... . • .. ...... . . • .. .. • • ... . . .. • . i'• ••••'•,•:,•,.r.:'..'...i.,.,.•.:,,, '.,,,,,i•..r•,,...:f•:,.,:,,,,-1..,:•,.,;•:,,..;..,::,:,,,,,,••;,,,,.• ,,,,..,,•'!,.•:.,,.,,..,,,,J,,,,,,,,,,':,,,,•,..,,,, ...,,::,,,,,,;-,..::•'.,•.!,‘!1 .•,.,•)',......';,:i. '••.,.,...,.,,.:,.. ., . „•„: , -...,• •:- : •,- , • • •- • •, •, , . . . . , ' ,•.. • 4' • ' .1.,;„.1',.:',,,'.1.,...4,•,%1;q";;;.1,.".4,',:.`.:,..',..:i:':i,4:.:::: .‘ilti';;''',.;;';''''''ii.1,,,.••;,,:',';i::'..:,!. ',' ' ".:";/,.,,;,;;.:.,";:.:6.'`1,:,7:•".'1 .!:,'.,,'''...,..''.'•r:',.:' '.:':•. .. ''• •• ' ' " ' '' . . .. .—• n ��_� FIRST Mf iEP ��+'`TC f-1E427-092 1 `,j �.I 1�"t�� Ja 1.!1 M b�JL ! . , f P i'. ,• ° ,. ..,,,,, .. . . . . i , • ''Y,. tD �'��•L . bEgt, M4rger'y P. K`'"zd r�esr, tnr'lanY.4'�'rfr, carIVeyta to amOh Of • ►e Grantees sat forth below an undi.vx led on ereent Interest t'" r+r. nn , rrr•rvr*n,, t'�F'+14, •'.7.. :+:f. 4.,....„ ,.W'l e�.•raw3 Ir,WhY4p Va F'YY �{,Ir•.xk,hFll� i*a 1.111♦iy e'•,MbIr1 T a w � { • crIbed lA tXhIbt a,ssh d is a o d by ref,rance i r t rp�ar . .. 1• eIh• .. tic.µ her •, . ,� The r;r4nteet; arcs (a) vlril Inzs, R» H twk M$, trustee a Yxttd tr Trl$t• %t4,k, ,;re nt cattd Deoem e 1,00 39 a, d4Ore r Graht*& i$ Settlo , • j, �_. cre*ted for the bent,tit f„..f Rit4.i .wki s» "Y! . Cb) vtrgina, RY 'Haw,i,rds, Trt,:stee Widerx' DruSt , a. . ti 11. r ' Auj2b4f*tL Za ~td D044t0"■5L 10, 197g, 4k4ryaJl CI:att r is r.,6:tlor, 70 t . 're t t i tor 44.40 it.+I,.or G c w le t4a'txl,no4+i01 Y.,6* {{lkr,t@•1 YI to * ° . .,I (c Pegg' hat/a IA b lyric's, nA: e order sc . r4 Iw f�tGYk.e kl,. 4'� Ar t dated ie er a0, 1:74, wherair trrtntor 2,s S tt1Ci.; r » g •,Ab X tih !0a. km� aram rot 1«p t� t4444)&4.t. kb& Nyi wy ItYria/4'• t:, 'y' , - ly� ','i't, , ' � J1 8,) pd'r 477 t w1l• A. ,:fret9, ?r«iPn.au• »sa,4,4t .trr1)n r —;a- 'itc.'1,• ra tt:, dated Oec lr 21, .15"1t wherezr GietttGOtr, ss aeitticr rt � .'6 t ! r, 4 t ;1 J ' j44•''i° zitlattati- for the benefit of Alaz Sodtt A,Yr 464, , try ` r � y yy�y�y�p ,M:� �y y� IL�,,��1y yY p�y� a,.�a.xo�,�� �y..y��yy yx 1 ■ ',.1 � ($) PWq'+•RI\ A�t I � a*M by 41.41 J,i1.Vl',TMAIe W118`e,r i x Wi74 M» 1_{�l'y ,,r 1,.l, 1, , � .: r i�Vit►. 4�� l �7�"� 2 I a d970. what it 4M nto I r w e+t a tA e ,n ,� {' wx t,., A I ,µ,: r roe t. beM f..t o �„rx ti I a'r t• i rr�?4ni1XUSip C,f J 1,0{Ilia,* ',,,,±tt PP146'n s, +P 1Ja,4rfh I ndt'r l''',"'"ft .+7�, ar j '; '1t ,"' + I z Y$ 3Lt .44 � 24, a x ; #hat,,gl, ør t t t tt°4r4 i.,e'+ a Ku t rt Y f; ,.. :, '■-yr Pi4 1 0 n•n , ^t�wI(�\rn 6'r y�pY - �'.' �»It.4M}NJ•�Kr \ i� ' •J-° ' '} ,'Corn. :. w►ro' ) u w d I, .' _,,. ,'1'�°Y:'i16.'„If,�x.0 JI ,. r'�a.i .d x. :- °. r,r_ ",rrt.. x r� I '.1 q: r�,a . .•. r4 Y 1 i w" "U .r -.t . a '.'..I, ,a. 11:. ,.rlt' •.J.. -, ..- »:«:•-,it.,f ,, . �, ...., r , k, .t ., .+a..l r 1 ,d ,:�R a, lyr;pli iX ,d..FtU'°Ar{-R "Rt)x eY.+l L„•;„ G ="' r .�- � c' » ,kt ',Y, N I.•p + ,: ¢,,A . t •,:, . fit h , r., u ,(r ag d1 t.rlta la ,M..... 1t t aerY },f7 ^a rf'rK 3 t{a: , .. „ ,:i , , �1x ISM-• ,�t � >al i f,.a.. t d 1, :,'..fa rr� wr'r r t,r, .' .( •� ,•:are,, (.t, ,-,•,....',...,'.., °� : c M f .t, r I 1 V' Ry .,t- r,..t„r , N , zi f Yi .-. ., !t a' .8 P ,.,71 ,;I•.„?..4 'iYfy"iq da l,:-.'x,: it_1r..; «,4 .'I ,.I,. r „..,' r ',r �t Yr #,) a :c r 1 r, a,.r 1, !s 74t a• ,. ..,,.+t t.. !�„ >,. .:.. ,"... ,r :4 vr,A ,.... r ,;5 r ',y� ',,•.' -. .I.. .... hh .. , r 1.1.,.,., ,.,1 1`a,C��I�,1., r! :''h I .raw' ,. "Ilr� 1 t' "1 "1° y gb (r o .. ..,4.A� ,.. .. •,t-}4!It ...,.! f .,'..r „b.i'.'. _..*Yr :'•v..f. Y,: '•' •.a: E 1 1- L. ., .f%, ..k'ai�!' 7 �- I,.. 1, 1. '7i 7 r. fi )1:, t ..r V F 1� �A t� r -,rr, 4.'x� ,P +Ia'e.k„Yw.. �xl. :a,k1-,1,. L, _, '". 4'•.r. ,..,... ,,, v, a , ... .. »'n r ' t.. tr a a'.t,;r=.,.... !I',�� . ,kt. r I.,I,..f.,: ..,. .., '.IC..a, .t a,.t... ..r_ r„r ..A, � i', C•,.' ! .',"el. ,. , -arr ,. ,, ...,sr.�f ..r7I„. skg... ;.>•._-. J, u.,, .X .,,. „ ......r'. t' -f fl� -�r -.is s a� t.` ,. ,...4 a4�,.I , 1. r of=r bn t_.. Fax/. .7 .tp , '�., r.,,,, .a. ,I fir,..,..^. V a:j,i ..rr fibs : •7'„ 3 �'. T ,.,y r,v11 a 1 4 b y... .- 1' s u• 1,,. x, 4 2',",t I „. t .._,..._.. y.. .Q.+ W-. ,`.''•(�.t.. m.-rS ,.. ..,.. �..,t'.'h p4 ,.. frkr v.'.:,1. .., i .,...., r.l,...r.,l.. .) „,.rr, .,a.-...,t jLI i Y•. 1{. �,`:,�h. , + ,,,rIx�C�o., .,r"•r ,,.,.af. .!...Y 1' C, :.,_ 1. .5�C.;,,rr •.kt.u. ,a...7.'�Y, g„ �}f t, 7°w p ,Ct FM _..y,"�� Jn.r � pp.,-,:L-�-..M,. 4 1..A. Y},. ,,.. ,.: 1.e. ,, �.. "Cr'...,. r r , f 7'?. tk�r"��,..4`.'a � r " �suf ax 1, T ,#sH,R M .,•, 1,1 ,.Y ,,,,, ,.1k .,i. ,.+! ( p, f..r,,. '. w 1 y yY et.l ,Ie rla, /1F ,k ,{, +,a.r • A '�'°w1i�r9.n3w;,.M.,r k ,C.1",:"', .•�� I. C^". ... .i,,._ .,t. .N�, �,:,., i�,Y , ,r{iF..a 0 ;,t!q.1«1ire,.., t:Y ;r �, 1C� ; ;M a f;N. u,1,.., ,.mn^' r 7'�,, ',, f..r 77,�,�,1 ..t7 ,t r ,- .r7,e*�Y r� y, C 1,���aa... . .1: I. "!-�''r':t,,�. ,�.,:. -,,; .. F"b;L eJ4"WYY�" , «•'SI,+iw:+ ',N :.ttl»v4.R'lt u.,x:�.IWY7�N`t' s�•,jr,.(�.''7'ir�',.,�,JaL.t+Ic;Y7��:.i•Nll,�r,�''.1•;cl y,•.}:1., .,.a�"'�;. - l+rY ,. � .: �.d: a,r w.r�,�..i nt. . • »-R -y.Y. �:}fY`. ,n. -, y.✓, d,7 '�^.. •.., �.� i:r�n�,... .:,i MiV � W..N14�"{” yf,IFu;� Y!�r ,. ,. ..,a.. y. � �,. .,M,tr.�2 .-I ,.Jxjpr[,y{Tr,.���r,�' :iYI, ,.4 .,fir,.. W,,1'„ ""C . ,. �t, 7•'e'7si`rrAY, � rlr ri•,• IY Tx+Rn, t .. � ,o. e W. J✓.r”...J r- ,Y .�,. )•. ,++ e..1 �. 1'..,.,.,.pr,x,7:. L-..4 .I t, �� t-M,�.\, '��`�"",� yYa� 0' .1 ., +.M' . ,, A c. f, 1 .: ,,. ,.1 r�:,,a�..•ra ! AI t a. f... ..'M1� .,.: .!, 4 ., N .i P.,; ,.t' k . 1 r„1 I. Y .,.It, ., .,1 sI r,>I..-.,.,:-L,• : � !i, .. a .. ....1..„, 1... .re -7 h east . �k +R Y. .� .. �. �., ,y�, i n.,Fa,J 1. ,..�.. a C,�, ..t"•7M 4. ,� ."._:�'. 1• , : �,. tr .M. f •!1 `.� '. vF. '„ r k s-m: M ,_... I .,9. .."iP�!,.111.... _9, ..�1r.i ,,a r c. .,.. .. , b. , .. � � .. ,k fir ,. , !,e. ,.G, ,.. .J,"r�"S ..."..k4.. ,. 1,.b ..,..,.. 4+•-•. : r , . ,.r ,. . .iV t., .P+ y 2d. ,.r �,., 7xl,t'r �:`4 z Ji' 716,ra7 ,.t,tax4. a7,tr. .t 1 f as .. f .r. „P, .. t... t�, 1 tr :r .1, ^, '$. 11� , r t xy �,1"'.'. -a 6 •r4 a *- a-,.,-':yt , 17 n ..v, 11 r, .F. �... . i.',:4.r, Ir,,.,,°ta { ..T; °r„ �, f ,., :, � .�Xl4!F .. . 4 i ..F A�,.. AJ t ja N..{�.,, {.. ,II� 1�,.n7 t .,�'..d' i,.0 �',IIkC. , .,'t' i•.: ,t ,i�. Yt. i 7 'r�: . 1i 1rI � r i ._Y, � ,:. r,. Y,., B lstfi,; e. S',�7i@-.u�fu1� r R' -,...*:,....'•'..•44,�. , ...-4i. 4.., H vda,l>.7 f fir. Jk�r`p,., 'c,x.k ,;�,,.:�+ V' f"t'it', , �".r ,414.,,,,',:•. �',r;; rI4�.:,cr�., a'W( ,{v»r.;!'k wk',r�, r r P ,.a.: .. • '4. Y Ti..-, ,n +.. r ',,,,,,,,,'•••,:i-,,,,',,,,' „ ..,,,',_;,...1' . ,1 .,x:IWAA a-w ,,',...1,...,,,,,,..t.: r>. � 9 e w,..„ ,. ti J, r,..a.r. ,.5, a . , N n+r "Iv e:r •r d.;F, le .;'E.1, I•nor S 1, + YP” rqr r x ,1: },1' i,: •.%. ,t r,,.! , .k ,,..-,., 4. ,.. ^ ,:.- a ..,,, o 4,; t' .' rt, ,F .,x ,., ... ,: � � , t ,•':''7,,!r. Nr .,,�. ..,. :, 4r r,r r �.r. ,y..,..x M:'ar:fc;" ��,.�',?'; r �,"tJ Sk r�d'e+m�'7h t rt'a'ti„�,•e,,.,.t r..,y ,r'a",r, _ .i x r .W� ,. t 1, q ,. a ryry ,, .•„ t 1;., ry r r.I f ,-,.r �..«7,r J„J' ,,.1 ,f. r>t, r, -t'-t z r I rr4, .�.. 1 , ,k„ st :,'ti,ri ,,a•i,: ,.m,,, �' y,- p.'.'' w 1...',; r, ..,,a r t r,4 i,Y„ *r 4; r • ..{C e a r7� ' �Y ':).' � "1 i, a ,$, t a.Y n, !y' i:.�,r\ .Y�a.Pr '�..fi 9.7 s t 1,':: C r tY r:5, �'4''X�l b y,. 11�p r�'9f,:�,«;:" �,. l, ,a�tz' t FxY ,t,lrt;x 'i,.: �r, ,,,.� '-i. 1^„a r,.'ytt�rd, ,::�. 41 f.�,t ',C. r r '� 2'I „:,•=.,'' s e,' 11. 71 V y J..'1 , ,n '.» r ”+.-,.i....' -i. ! .,'. r"4,,.. 1', Y.: '^• Y i f ;',, :t,,•',"-4 n,,,,,',,C t x a . !< �,, i.` M, V al!, � �' M1 1 t f �.} ,1 .Ir X L" Y•Y:i tY � t 'ar A7'1 .0 ,,! . 1..•' T.... � .... ,. � ..,1C�y r» 4J- i '�'t( N ,;1X ... '.af IC '.,r it attr, 4n,.j. TI 4w;�;, � I 't , .. I xe,/,, „r r.,,.,t,, ;,'1. 1.,. 1•,,ix a, :d I J ,. ,+' Y •( y •I, '71f :Ary..4, t7 A.«j� ,9,1'•, ' " ,1.:,;� r , ..,. 1 R';', a,'-,W,+;4 f.i -..'1.,,i°r 7•na,emrN. � t p:x4r'k� r lkld y t �, .... .Y,E+,rIM1 rr rc.uhl:•1,.r,pw p"I.wfy rm J. to±,i!. ,tt�• r ° Lj .._-+.- • .-•`.... ( _:7,3,?• .� , .a..,r,i...ara.a... .. .�.J ;. =R..,.Y r.fT..1a.^'C7wa lrV.,' ._�. , ;~ •.zlti +• �.-a 5.,,.:.k+.,•w-rV1,1�':';': ...A:la.r.-„,,:�-•,Y ur R T o•t...'.,.A �, . '•`:FYI'--.... 4 s.+u...1u+. :6��.C;y I�.'.ry,k.k..ri a:x c �7 i.u. t u.a.t.,...�.,':+.•tk i.r: ..•...: y w�. «11 ,.r��t as'd(L!Y(O4-C An*';f"I"P I- p8 Y 'k 5 C Fdt . { ���1 �''r° . l5r, !� �67--t719,:."7:1 'tpptT ti��,�%��.�!.a•;h.�>!,�t{C a Vii 7,-.}t:.h,v�r�^6nNr1 �,.1�4;-r r�,,H C,i �r 4G�cfa 7�.r�4 tt.1t4A t-r.�v- �:itN t i l'�r�,1' Fj 5`t M4�. .1n7 Cn x�rY y xY:`:a}S.'>.4_.,•, . r ,.,••,t .. "Y „ .,: r ,, ,,,,, nr.� J., .. , t, •:� 1 . - � i ,5 tP '': *: ,•. I I I • 5 , i (g) 6d.1.1..1.4. ► Sao Russell., Vk'C:s'Cod° uttdex rust t:'""i , is .4-i.9 .kItt,usiskAt dttted; t)ectther 27„ 1o,7a, br11e1risirt 6z4zit t,cir /14 Settlor, ' r,rrF}irc.,d ite,r th4 1;;,*11,et°3, o4 ctt”; Wed., ^aatsit,,1,» (h) P f. z � �.dL � J ( ) Wit i,� ,a :tatt Russell., ia' 9, r .t4.t c1 + + t 4 5 tr:t.,TY FS,.. 0 . 1 .tawlrrewa,, iris} �trlt, V Y .r (k) Pt,mdera.ek k a Russell,u se 1, 1�liva+iu.•11y. ', "+ E1) ra d Vznc�»t ftuitaaall, i di.v' dt 'Y1lf. ";='t 74ha wxac W'Jt'k•`tl,derat ion for tk:1 titIbcrayakt,‹,ztt Is 7aoAe ;• .t 44 l . 1-9 t6 gi t t} l'A ' T3 tills 7,14y of G or,, 1,978. as ».ahw 1{I!'�. wwrr.v ' I,td ✓tacit,'� A do OsIt Y 4 iFt •j w ,lp r' y 4 t A{.l'G. Of 'l•,RGEGoi7 }, { M. A n 4.1 Its . I..+Wtt ity o7. a �[.At'llu4;i ) 11 • y��� h d " •I I ,k''' . .a•. Mtn I* MFIhM.. .a ±Ilse .t�d AtC c4tartf; tt4 ).*79, r,, ` ,4;jt'r' ; f r{ i »r r • n'":,�ix 3=.`f' — ww..r,,., Js '. + ' �r ‘ * @1• �1�q i,: ��5lIJi�,6!'y tw�i31'•G#slrt» 4i"»+L5"IAy 't/ rr "1 4V�P,,, yr+ ray 1 �� ,ti, y)+ ^»n1M G4� ,1x l \Iii M I y ��y�� ■ • 1,!"..,',,,–.- 44,.fitf,ptiloot�f'If� IM+i.• !i}t W 4�., , p ,,7 i l g.11. tra t± Mor ' I1F;It,,t . I 1 ortlta. da Or 07;:E5 `i;s1}'', N. '.r ' pJ^Mr 1 �rFM•t4a'14 n t.4^,-'4M r ta.:4viw I i !,�irk� ' ,,x ' ' 3'att 14, ox, -j 1C 97t)0.t?D a , Jilt . t 44 s A^. H r) 0, . P f '' t'' ,, 7,i 7 r"u+. ,„ lu 4J 1. ° ''' >* Vie.'''• ''1, '''''''14 1 ,I •w.+ . r.w,w'..1,1.Y a...,.MnW"rW.!awr,,,,,t'tuM*sJ:,gW'lifitk:0 dttlfNA1. "1td0.t1 „,#,+,- I , �. w� �•+•�i:1.�,Y�kN ..•I t..m-) � ,--f' F.v wr'M,.t.µ s ”"1 441,.''',",,,".'."' 4. ' • r , .«:.,,1.....«aw.* .,..u..ad Ha,x......,,,..w"...:..Y..ti.7ut1::.,.tz..'.c:„:�=.:,.,,.�.-u.�..1..aauiwtl Ldh!C7G::..a.,.w...wa.•..♦f6wrl.+A..n«M.:::1 t, ,'J,+".7:+ 4..,..°.n'w:�..ate..r1...+.d.GJ'H,.l. ..:..� i, „..,.,:..,w.+u.,«.wy vr.1Ya'.,.J.;�.•;�e^.Y744^k�.'~.«..f�.«..,..r..,"�.-...-.+•-k.,-rC-a-^f »w,:.a•.,-.1... m�el0•^a 4tL°•,ay�P n R.rY.C.,'Y..�r,.(1 t..t ..,,., i,r J711 l�(R'•�,a1..7Y:�{.: t�U,,a:v'i'y t t.q4�....., i.ro'�5ti!'i..{< `S: ,�t,t°ti 64 iil.�,;s ti� , �", s...Q-; `„ y --r 1h r r_i �is,_r `T C 4 . -s.r ter i- t yw „rk rt,r.r. �¢rf uN 'i.J . a s ,4...17t',f..wP�' ,�H. • �; ,,'•,.'.' y @t Via” ¢� w}` }�l' ,::Y.;„ � t - .'''' '' J" ''. j,r 4-7W0_ � y• .A,. ,i,L �r� -„,, f t. t t.{{�, • .}rwti,.eKVJ��j�+.., ,s. �i i t� ., , ' . • r r I S .s. • I '•1 j}��,, ...^ it o Deed wtte �iYt k ' Mt.1rgmzy F., Kruegefr :$ Gi«42'.t6# 1 I {•' one S>taut heart quartet- of the Sotat hwasi.t' gaar'tet of S 3C111oh 33.1 v, 1t "”„ I .-- m.--p.1,. ar .~+wlaaAt,..'.4,044'i A 4416 Le W,t,4,+t.AfiEmLOrh,Ktir�.".t,nA, h'4tirin4.,AgCrt.1f s°;. i+;Jr' Cutltaty, A4 tt o Oregon� exoirpt that tract wonvAyed b doad „ rw1, 7;.. ?. r corded £.a £ c 38? At P4ge 400 Waah flgton County 0 Oregon<wed • • . : ,, Rtcat'ds t ` i 3ssxIJMlu1 a' ,. s 1. The ;r,),g,htr.0 c., the pub.1a.o :t.n and t ttttAt po:ttLon !....41 • ,k , . 1 ,,, , 1 K �pa;,� i: ��?xxlg urxtnrts.�t l,la� �a.>z�,r.t.a �sE� �.S{t. 1��th ,�,a�anu,es or �cht�:a s ., ., . i:.,,..•....:.::::',.. F4d::ry rigid. " • 'c , 2. Cpt o Agro t twebn Matgety F a Kr gar as �,. r ._..st p 4� r4� r C1F Ae r�r m 'r+ , ,v� '.•••:)'`•',tr , 4 j rl yM /y• . i ; a '' 4 AU that hart C t*::r "O:rtt.. 1/2 4° tno l*ttra .��. 1w/,/, 4t Saa4.tloil zi F,ftiE d 'k da 4 46 6w114111.p:2 +CtUthr 2'1a+�'k .9r weatt kt:.:;,A7�gt .l5 }:+s.rAdif16.�i� ,« r.;, t1.i,t's '!, 4 Wathhinejton cbutyr S't�t' o of ;t rele'ir Stti tkt fficl4, Cat 41! St:bo is ,,r{ r...,,,,,...,,,..4'" `; {L±�: ,. � +�4 f�(1 1i''"ri u. Y '�a.:r`..•.e eSy...w+l {Ct . i. - i „�� .: 1°>�'"n 74'r�t d"t..ilxti d�+��,i�+�h, A.t� c��''�Aeniuw,r"r}ai ri;G ��. • ,•�Rr�jr' 1,�`a�;r1� t.�..� �a.,m��M+,i,�,r:pysra v ,. a . , •h r Ir Jr _�Y,^"'tF,17 t'�f�`y�' n.dii 5 1 ,.«n441,041 „t ds 'a1 1 than' Onitlr $tat4 Of et 6r -04 it �y 1 -'.A J{J ,n,{ r�l'ain Lft and L. 5m •off' and M ti ex�''� ,s dI Alloaa Z. SStr 'hclr'6�� .,,r 4,,x! ,rf . . al+r 6 dofo�dAtaa tern; Any 9a xb'td 4o3k /60r y.; ,...i,.1,;,,,,....,,,,;.,,..,,,. S a `` .. : kx „ s.. Flo SO ( te'ri1l4 k x * +i . a1 F. C tht t.$1.0wA ir tfaMe�.i; t lo,{a�f L11 y t r 4�1 r I , lrt� 2r',F, >L , ,g i At the ?thLkA , tza � ",u w'1.I%'' Ag'rYa s}intio 4 oula0nif M si ,Iy `d yA4g L fieatl I ., ? e. '; �T " Wi l, tt+ rAd1. r thence tnnth O° q4; 1''1`� , .. Y -,:.,,,'1,1_,)i, ,,,?,!,,,,,,,.: WOOL a ttik.:. +0 O 00 fimt$ t a+ ,wt «R 'A h.,,:.',.',1,...,!.-, 4.4 r j tt A I 80.Aer $t A 4k0h t " 400 d4tw ':'tl•ftrit g I wd Ng ,, a v stt on to orth line fi: " et c d thence '. ; a,t , #��t r : Jxtta 10.444" rAral. 41v44 i.41.4 4wei,k 't;o0t 4a0' : .c";-.,t, ' ��:"�'�4. "mtt 4 a di$l .0� og 4$0 tott to tlt x.at ; , , .,�,,:x.5 YµY L of b oint ll 'Y A „ 1 jyb1 n ' I - I , ` n 1i ' I I • r I • Rtl,t W. „:" h..',...ri,. •p...., *1,41...,4&IK,dS...�r.•,,,. u&?:ant.T..�.c rl9 l/T•VOt.....;.°.t.,8M.d 4 V av,V j,-'^.Rx:fTr,k..0 t a"�,.•'�i V.•4'«:w Y. ..k_•x.m+>4•. ,_.a.a,..:.°:,..a... ..«"-,w m,.,l.•..".:. .P:i f 2.':r'»,...-Y< 'e`^i 'At ^r.';M".. �..'.':;•a:-4'F4-...r,. •..,6: ,w..,•'I;:,w .._.I.K ,ti,,.ig.'u ,'., -..:r,.:�,a...r.«x.,,A .«• .,.• , ":�r �"''''''''''4"-i-h 1! , i :.,r f i i"_s{:r �f' , E,' H bL-.l—L.r_1 111„,,,4.'1.141,. �„kz '�, ..� 1.1" ,rU.,3 1� 4#:4,rM 7v ,. ,,u)-4',L tJ ,.r�,'CFt*vuu �/,Y, ,,!.-rz .��, tr fi.. .I,Y,,x)yr rrr.-, J.f_Ylti y-fM�Y !,M. r w_`.�t.A.�.Y�_x t. :t,:A 1 xr it'd. )-.n.fi�1 ,rT }Z 7�r.��6r,.,�� l a.�.,t.tr,iM1f N'{e. ?2 � �'f ,1{o `� .YY h±�{..N�?.1:�r;.5,i�r.t 1.s,w V i8"2 r. ..'.m'...r...1a +.:a r' '' �.r•,.�.1 !Syy v:"ktw�1t, !„ ,&.ly,aa., r f.d 'A,n �3�, 1d.I 7{ Y. a S nd r �.r y„,:'1 i. !�((1�,�.0 q„ .,}.<� ,e..„.,f r,1 r M v♦. ,t,,4 tUYt,.F 1n r Jy). r �.e:r'�.,,.irV, rwr ' I.,.,, 0 ,'{ t;lq.t,..y,':'r r'r,r,.d,+1�.{r.t,4.iY r•,.-4,h.�l:'1 r r h r "1 'r.+.r{ ,�,1 . 1”W. ,' ''.,r %,,. :1 ' 'M.. . i + = ' '•t 4 -f r ., ' .•r rr' ; ,« I ' ' a ..., •, r , 1:xCEPT; I rr . I >! r ,. .•,' /. 4 1b w n vidtr1 t;na# h>: SLtLrestxndxAg ;,,,of e~rit4.41-1 owl:. '4 \ r ,,.,:"'0 w`'t,t; wh4e11 i1.es ulmitdiAtet $duct; 6. t•hM 4610 by 499" P.LAOt de w # It,..,, 34i ;". 'i Jfi7rr� t t ro•,X,Lbew Az ;,44.1 wnc.t`k✓l.atWa> ,,,Ir i:'x:xblw4,„ .,,., 4.,4;94 a,... tb» . - ,w. n$�.t ,rt`p jr'�1,', - earcohahtht cv'er the pipe lead,t,ry from that w .ti , i� ti4:4 w1 f °44x:7+,{; 1 4:td the rrgAt to l,:It the water trot tier'#'�r wc11, for do>`�.46..;, , . .1�{ i4 ,I }{,yyr�hj cixb n �'1 N '4 w br•4�4 11 1 1Slt'rr 1 Nt-, 4 e s .�r a,.r� �.��� p;�r���rs��;��, s s� '� x� �c g � � � 31'���r� } a 1• L f/4"••!}•.t1l1S7/4 a`1 t h ;PK1l x'!#' on Yrf ipr.''' $ 'I.tZt 1.1/,,L1 rl ',at• .!-r i',, 'y r .I1,4zr n fi�1 w ''; 45x' by 450" trdt+`y Plt a•rll [»l►J.!!f L!y 'Li w 'MW r r Baal: 5. dl.5 tance of 1I22.03 wromi-CrAo S01.4%.,..06,8t, • 1,4�r1 a 1,i?'„e'...vir:4+ C.!OrM' of chat treyct; thence South :2'44` 4zt r4 • ' • -'• .. ypr Y'' ,.ff''"rx .::rlk,'ili, dnt,$t'�rice of 1 4,.31° '' t:t iACP� $Couch ,J'214 WOiit 1.'� i',1rg.,44 t.,,, ` i47,4z�-q f iaCA!'14 o°' 213.17' ?„l"? 1.ha w 11 na la/1 9 10-cat td Sly 1 `. 1 ,I -}`w ,kj'"L:44•Yt',";.g.i '' a concrete ete block ,..4111).0k1Se, "t./q Y'it Tic"L Wd th ay. edi0f- rta4.y rt e,ryj,, +R °:eur 1„;4, ► 1t of 15” 1Y6.�/ 4�s7d �thMi"""tK ti+ �wt Lellhd1�Ai Iv .„4,i 7 'tCavicyr l, ;$14030l'."ir to A,j,T, tl'tAer 1 etm4 Ar. cl"ndl.r1.0 4 r oLtre ' r t 1 i 4 1uh i ri7 r'r=e�'Feir.t,Su t,t r � , r�rn palg+�t 3 �n�i 4 c� t1�� ,~an�zac�l �r�;1,� �kl�xLmarXitr + ' 1r rrr 9 yP t 1 1 Fk rtv r aa r J14 J Y d y± n�rr i,i,k, i 1 d. t t!itY f!B CKL.)orr 'd 7 r a`96 W ,be 1 y? r 0 'Mt na ,?'1 , 7 ,"d r 1+ aa fQJrer 4414 4014 ,it, r'A.xah4 ► 4n JtydCj eWwld� lA .1�rpt.�t +u Ir r 1 T Ynr7 4/8, pa�e ;47 oAroi9L1 117, 4yd Bfhr5ton Cok,I t)q r`A '• e 1M, aR gon wd,e4 tieeordsn vr�1r t w, a ,ti n t,i "1ht „�xl } ii' hdlt 4,5 % X44 t rx1nt' ;C} 1 water /J 3 F1 " t th ' to , }Mr � p'' r 4 y p 4tqrf6t 4, t to C !1-d •*f;,r hr4fo,,A .,5,,t C'":k' r,t),tyblal reO e1ttAV1Vc's read , . gx 7 f 0,P lv,� ' ", ar u .� OX, i A y u,444 1 '*wi e 4 ,w.ea .v».r. IS ti 1 P4Iv 29 H'ii?Y t.,.. ,; ti 44 r .i 4r ro t,i,.d 7 '„„..4 + �F9r t a�ha I�t 4a e:T'� ��J Ow e9011 �a.t dGt rd e .. 1 !r y : ,, 11'p r,°1 1 1 a'� l. I''t 2. AA ea e.e r A e n t c.,, ea tei r ' / ai um II t.► 4,1,•,+.,yA,L .q1,in r4 Mr+w l'..w v w:1wN [, ,'.:!FL(1-r,', a%*1 , 2 11$$ 1 d reC Y} ' ..•FJ M 1 'p� r I �40'7t . C Gdf1 9 i it �k � rr S %5 t GI S kmit<dXav,,i +,'.', };r rr iiir,I + '' p '1 h �o ooltb u Oregon ,. ,v6 or Porltid GAS &▪rad CCC .4 t 1e _� ' r r Ll ' M » ttM1jgp•y'1,,,r?2,S,ti{ar,t, wlafty M• r tio 5oA0tMUct l f nd YM4iAtan*Ac1 or pNpe4▪,1114 1,)t .r u.«T ryAyy r{ ■, 4,a ''. H}t�:Y,1,.1v',,i ri a,),.,k+�i,h'l .. .�.:id, u,awin'".a+ ,..,Mw M"Q",W1,...tot) 1'YiM .Y,c..., .v i, t,#„,ry,,.��rrv�I r, •1 hits l rz,c VA,S101'.3 t� ze z�M tad Yrah fir, 1,942 and' z,twcttl1+4 1 *�y�r,,1,4:let 74?,,Fxh,'i;t'Y ,�'a,,' n A ti T ! :" 4%1. li lfbcO d' ° , 1. r � t l�IY4'�ia �► l J''4�� �x� �>r�1t '�„ k�� ail � 5��► , ilt�•,�cl�.kt t;IS'"a �. kb' f l,r'"vFa +” „ �eljrrry 4_a°iipa° t'grf tat f r t'aC'lttq l $n favor of Soot nett/ Pao./f 1.c P!}i 1 .Latta, %hu„„ d n • �,T'r t i?i, r r1,r.:,!a.{ f. .:m a+ r r 1 a 8b A. ,i t #�tt P .r a r�'icr �• n:'Ia,n1.e'.f. t.., "<'w� Lf"41�`��``!�y '��'l�r.;'�'�b Lrrti��l{�,1.,1"lr�w"�.•r�r�r�' and y'.'�rtt w.e a 4'.��l1J'1(.,"'�' r,J� Q .� .�'�',tet.�•�"�`1�. r', • lt,"rr°=!j' rj, over Parcel 1t, --j9g3u`..",.b,ij1;'',41r 4 out 6.A.30 tr+!` w{be,,,c,41 k„y 4,%i,itx,-,z, :'” ,+r..IAAd4.,,,ra 414«4 r�'r*O, =Ind ' a op,' .Y !_- wr. ,. a 14Pr7 **IA N+0!"r ,y to �4y z:lyrra�r�L 1r p4M t��'+W�'11+V;3d�I':� �n�t'1r�A►•P-+.tax r.a..r.w ,rwaw w"i'. t•!'�"�CIU March'Mnn Y;T 441 ri;jl �1"11iJ�(Vl 4.�44+41.i.1y�#�4 rt I r 443- p f 't��•� ran nx w f A • _ 11rrrl fi'9.Sjtrr,r 111.r WL`�1.!`.'i ,�'�M �:Mo+ Y. 46. :t1�'r p'{til'-vt 4;.C.1 p h4 N 4-t2"w.C6r,",1z, ",.r 141x it*.rlr 'rr'r'"rv.''';'""M 2w.,...,'� " ! ' ,si7R 4 , it 5..h#.2" ,t1i Lavrtr,k' wsf a♦.+t,.l.l.r.iw Net.era# eltz'lkwl wrh, C y +9. �G" a��r t A t w r° r�;�. n' . pr, 10.,!+� ',�.It�.e'��1 i G h f 4 v4.. 't' �t r1 r`- r.. '. ,.�. . M 7 r 444 1 d 4 G « 1. tr ry.I°, .}r j` -, '. ,. Arr'+°'r'rp.kxlw=tt wwYw,ar a.. a „ �.�. :' 1tir,}� � 4 i �• ' or ' r d;: t Pdg* L Yd41At'!r • ,• 1tlev11N'Y r .r � 'i•r I r' !r M p' r ..•4 1,fi.,'x,�a.k ��t`#4114 t« ,.! l r n j(J �g t • 21 / I ' 1 .irl ie, 1, ' 1 6 : • - ,,,t , ...•tr+..a' .."l..a tTki.S_''.:a °.'." .ti.:m ,:ra e,• �a tt� rm�,r * - .. , :.-,1;uvm:,,m r.•ir;., r Y w.A'i..4-�,.k r.k�+P...,,1..k:...�.:gkn +Y H.,u H•�w,.-4.....J^A.,.rW ..>:�7•.M1 y, .., ,.r z-U,..�r.,:n.J.k.l•✓:.y/,.a.L4,'...,..rJ..,,+,,t:R Y:�..«� •,:..7y.:.f. -. .r sar$'w.;.;..,;,.:.J'•h_,:.u.-.• M k . ..,l. :.. � - ^Y�,,,i"f-.F a, a .i 1 Z.✓- T�i,, �"{k,ic.-„„.,,�„./T .r �,,,..-wu1 n.�.. .:a 1,fs r f 1'zaa;L S!' r 'Cr.?0.14 r'a' ..,,r a•e�,y u�t , ,N :p .a4.n. , . r . .w''.6"...:'"-''''-"''''''''''' , , �.;t�eNg i ,i x..+�a,w,�a. , xx�.`�_-1,l,J•` � K.l;i,r�3'. t{{.�•.i r ' ;�c rs b.r A'f`"1�� ..c : ` y+.f�.')}}'}�. Tc.t.��+�( ��G•�°t^!;x R l a'.,t� 1h�v!!�r,.e����r;t s,y„U I.� •�1..-,.y�'k l`�''«'t&•N74rrfif`� • a�A:,V 1'i»t s ';r�,..Vp .�{tF m.t�,.•' t c�t f sM,.X.� ! -,,1 •� •R 1�in r f.,•I,��w t r F£.}.i J�.rt”r p. .�r�,SS�.:{3�,.-_h��r�k;I i.,t.',,r{r kr F+,.�x,�1 1�E±...+i X�r.r't��1.1 P�r n-/L«r,i K x.� is,.r r IiJ...,;.�•7 l 1,-.. ..,,�F>�,,v6,r..,.t�.� p i n.. `kt n r,i 'd.S,r.r'r,,,,t,�,•'?'t mR'�t u, .,..r P V.•a`Fri„f�$i+tr rpR R� .. ..,:„�,,w,3�A,U,t,�r..M w r's�P:Y i�11.,.a���-w �? .�: �r-,,r,-n"r. '..'s��3'� r 1/ ,'r�k-•�.4�,.I 1�,�y•�F a E2'nB�ar,S-� r C.*�♦.'� a,t..d �.��n .i,,Yt .}.i{j..S.I},7:"�.0.A'vqc4 �'e°�r;�,rrL/+.t.�r•„7'-s q tit r s!�`,C ,r r.l.t.'�=ti:.tr tite�,z.�,� .)h.;a,.,7,✓ ..�,�� ,I.4.r�fir Yt. — ..w-__ � 4 rx, ,..'e., ;.,..tk.,.s!;r r�.a 4 i-+.,,{r_�•N ,:.r/�e,d•at.0 ;; r,,`,�tYLA�Gt i"��iY n` ���h'•" CudC''''',•/•'.1'-4:d,}.+,k:�!fr 't ''''f'`!y t �, ;,'.r•.l S4�r .�tr"1:t,r;r..t .. tl • i J I I t v , . • itue r, 1 • ••; D t , kaa ete a;xliI ?2u11.4"" . &a t'.�a ghat pt�°retion;a","t4,1 ' tt'a,.a# .4� ,i trC, 7 3l �' 1S144tiI7fit5 �t14�111�4ir, 5 0, 6. Option hgreamotht botwo,ebn M r ary P. tr e qer &o zel1or V.n : r , , I ` . l „ • : 'a+ t I , r } ' • r S '' , I 1.:: T I r , , V a v... sr,tsv p),0,4,0,,,,,.., 1 t F,,,x 5. t t .J f1,t,. a, phi, dirot E4 oa l ,4 . `t'.b" ity ft�Y A•u 3 d+fb 'r t , '� `� a' 5 F• F 0, ibroist stet r>bq.114i,ita> •bt p{ir46�+1ir �a ;'i 1 '' lrir".r 1 I i.'•'' ♦ y F!rvFicPi}Y rtr�''' 'rF t 15, L ' p!t7'lidt,,` rr / ' ¢+� • ;IT 4 fb 1V.;r a.:fll J*tia 4w'KFAldlil4� .« w yi the Yit e . �,a 4,r•. :' i t, '1 ,;',: i ' , , , .-,..,...;.- , .,,,,,-..: .. , .'iw r iw. 5 „ dy ��y�,t�k •�, •11A 9'C+'� '. ci , rrfF .' � �, old', 1„ K,,,, 1�t,t,r�r t3 fin a iI'ct'r iC�b t't' s1M1 , {dr p Z7 iy� � � M'� ^ � ,� �1.�j a f�a�f�'* �I X ty�,rrtlo Y ft % � � i1 Syn� i G @t�� Mt {f .•'''�y'' a '!' .a�fi . ! x u t II>rf= % ,. ' p4s♦ ., ,qr• w,, � Y r'.1YL s• ,...,M+•a tl "r#„r•Y:r: .fin , , yJ y,1.. ..� , k ' I I II ' , Ps a C1t 1°r' ' 1,',,? ?�. lot. r 4r kt • • BV.' yl"P tr 9it1� I' t � t rtbl, A : �,n4wr.WytMw,•,wr ti's •°+rWVb/.^ y ' : 1 it I •P I ° y'. O .,. Sta-f Review „ D �:.._ ,/ `/e CITY OF ,TIGARD CDMMUIVIITY 'DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - C (I Date /a . 2,s` i•, • . 1 APPLICANT ,+, ,),M .d'%l , _ ;. . PROPERTY RTY LOCATIOA~! Address . -.,r ,.+ .r.1,_•.. Tax Map/Tax Lot " ,,, `tie o } , 3 PROPOSAL DESCRIPTIOAN/'NECESSARY APPLICATION(S) _ ..... '6-.'`' r 7" ' ,,,---,,,,._,, - . ',"--/ ,,--,,, , .1,/ c---) L.,.4 i ,,-- USE nd��� F r r • •Ezs t Y��' . . ' r'. ., ,l om _ /° !e...- ,,, � f Adjacent Property /%ed‘';'‘.f.-. ' . Y north `",. ' i- It) . •west i y,, � ' ' te ' - Y .5. COMPRE ENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION `"° , ? ( , ,, - '�-• .✓' /e,--'''° 4,,),.''/7 --- 6, ZONING OESIGNi9ATION f/__ .. PLANNING �ORGANZh`BIdYN N�► CHAIRPERSON 4 I 7. NtEIC�AR(�RA�JOOD p�. PWONE R. CODE tEQUXREMENTS I Mihimum lot size/Width --'.;.p." i Setbacks: f 'olit cor �� : . � rier �4 lade /D° x Special tb c�Cs d streets '--"---' established'shed areas per intensity zcones .---- to,ietiands t . '.. , flag ft atces5C "Y ��il��19e� zero' lot line ....,. ' Y� r/iitdtn lot couece :....._, Aliff44#6--- 1 aatimUm bult41d)ittg height r , • • 'sP ecx l height limits s flag lot --- other - . ' Density calculation �. r'.•, . .�: ��.,a.,. ....,�_.;�•� • ;:., � .,',,., ..err . ' Density transition Landscaping: minimum % of lot area „, '�y.�. .� Street Trees �► ° '" � ♦...J��/ r•.�i' / •r'.Liu z'..l.i .. .,v,.1 �� � B er Areas et{ Parking Areas l . � � i • Visual. clearance Parking and loading �- G Access and circulation • r—sf�ilr�r c '%+ ./.. . .. ', dl'•- ..lY.-.�.+... .q 'w �/ :[.y:;,... Signs J 1, 9. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS (Seq application checklist for specific items) x Sensitive lands: ,•flocadpldAn drainageway >25% slope�„�,.: � Wetland s . ., . ` • Open space Historic overlay Street inn rovernents/connections®bi p 'ketys . I 'S / irr N 1 4 t Right-of—w 'Right--of—wv dedication / 6 ( i / • • . 1 Air y eweh im rovement • Sanitary Se p rws St• yn y.ew er ik rovements • ,/ I 2 .�. r 441',"+ 1 ' V(‘if, N C InproVement Agreement Permit; Sods Pees. c _ Other agency ermits 4 rr " i 0 PROCEDURE Administrative staff review! �� ► r ` ; j:141 . Public Hearing/Hearings Off icer Public Hearin /Plannih,.. Commission The Administratiiie decision or . Public Hearing shail occur a rogimatel' 30 da• s after a complete n is filed: PP atxo A p� - y .�' petQ a .„lic � . 4O-day appeal period follo04s all decisions. (0 • 73P/b422P) • ,r I i Staff P� Date g g( CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST • The items on the checklist blow are required for the successful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application, This sheet LUST be brought and submitted with all other materials at the time you submit your, application. See your application for further 'explanation' of these items or . call" Planning at 639-4171. . ITEMS TO BE BASIC MATERIALS INCLUDED. A) Application form (1 copy) B) Owner's signature/written authorization [ / C) Title transfer instrument [ D) Assessor's map E) Plot or site plan F) Applicant's statement (G)' List of property owners & addresses within'250 *feet [' (H) Filing fee ($ ) , lL :' Q,/,411) 't`Pa.t,/ OP) t eCii4t15e SAT'01> of- 'P' Ld it.ArrodS SPECIFIC MATERIALS ;` �' ° .totx. °5 i T 'AL.,.` A) Site In'For^ntatian s! ov`6n (No, of copies ;): [ ] 1) Vicinity Map t ,. 2) Site size & dimensions [k 3) Contour lines (2 ft at O--1I or 5 ft for grades > 10%) C 4) Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds LP 17 5) Locations of natural hazard areas including: a) Flood lain areas b) Slopes in excess of 25% c) Unstable C ' d) Areas with high seasonal rater table [ e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential f) Areas having severely weak foUndation soils 6) Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive p ..+ ntory including a) Wildlife habitats C b)Other st�. [ 1 W 7) Other site n features: a) Rack outcroppings [' . �a b) Trees with C�� 4- caliper measured 4 f eet from ground level 8) Location of existing structures and their uses [ 9) Location and type of on and off—site noise sources [ 1.0) Location of existing utilities and easements 11) Location of existing dedicated right—of—ways S) Si a Development plan 1lin (No. of copies ��. ..,. )i [' r i) The proposed site and surrounding properties s 2) Contour line intervals r", 3) The locatorr; dimensions and names of alit a) ,. ) `� Platted & other Public ways Existing & lotted s y i and easements s on the site and fan adjoining C properties A1:)PL.ICATE01 CHECKLIST Page 1 i • b) .oposed streets or other public & easements n. on the site [ c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed N • streets that require future extension [ ] 4) The ) location and dimension of: �,o ,„ a) Entrances and exits on the site [d b) Parking a r n and circulation area s a ` c) Loading and services areas [� 4, „ t: 7 P d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulat ion [Pf , e) outdoor common areas,, [✓]' f) utilities • ,.•, ") �ibove ground u EP 6) The location, dimensions & setback distances of all a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site [ I b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site [,,f 6) Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions [ 7) Sanitary sewer facilities [ 8) The,location of areas to be landscaped [6,1/* 0) The location and type of outdoor lighting - considering crime prevention techniques [r 10) The location of mailboxes 11) The location of all structures and their orientation [ proposed sewer reimbursement agreements [ ] 12) Existing or ro C) Grading Plan (No. of copies ] The site develop ment plan shall include a grading p la n at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1) The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating g contour lines, slope ratios and soil stabilization proposals, and time of year it is proposed to be done. 2) A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiating, a) Subsurface exploration and geoti,lchnical engineering report [' I b) The validity of sanitary sewer and, storm a draina service g y proposals c) Problems will be mitigated c.' That all ro •. p gated and how they will be mitigated 0) Architectural Drawins's No♦ of ep ies 4 p� r h � The site deuelo went clan proposal shall include is .�: 1) Floor plans indicating the square footage of all .- structures proposed for Use oh-site; and [el 2) Typical elevation drawings of each structure, [ f E) andsca plan (No, of copies j p p, n at the same scale of the The landscape plan shall be draw site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1) Description of the irrigation system where applicable [L�f 2) Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings APPLICATION CHECKLIST i-- Page 1 . , 3) Locati of terraces, decks, shelters, y, ,ay areas and c+mmon open spaces C..1 I 4) Location, type, size and species of existing and ' proposed plant materials, [ The landscape plan shall include' a narrative which addresses: 1) Soil conditions. C 2) Erosion control measures that will b a used er F) sign, Drawi.oqs Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter . 18,114 of the Code as part of Site Development Review or p rior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct the sign. C G) Traffic eneration estimate C H) prelaminar artition or lot large adjustment map showing ( of copies ' 1) The owner of the subject parcel [ 2) The owner's authorized agent [ ] 3) The map scale, (20,50,140 or 200 feet=1), inch north arrow and date C '. dari 4) _ Description of parcel location ocaton and boundaries s [� k' 5) Location, width and names, of streets„ easements and other public wa y s within and adjacent to the parcel [ L 6)• Location of all permanent buildings on and within I , 25 feet of all property lines C 7) Location and width of all water courses: Cam. Y 8) Location of any trees with or greater caliper at 4 feet above ground level C T 9). All slopes greater ,than. 25% C ] 10) Location of existing utilities and utility xlity easements E 11) � u For major land 'partition which creates a public street:' a) The proposed right—of—way location and width C 1 b) Ft scaled cross—section of the proposed street plus any reserve strip • [ ] 12) Rny applicable deed restrictions t 13) Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land di i sion where applicable C pp �. x ubd yas�an Frelsm�nary Plat a and ( ....,._.,, data show�.n� �a� of Copies " ); 1) Scale equaling 0,50,100 or 200 feet to the irnch and limited to one phase per sheet [ 2) The proposed name of the subdivision [ ';� 3) Vicinity map showing property s` relationship to arterial and collector streets [ ] 4) Names, addresses and telephone number of the owner !'I developer, engineer, surveyer, designer, as applicable( ] 5) fate of application U 3 6) Fioundar lines of tract y to be subdiVi,dej 7) Names of adjacent subdivision or names Of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of unsUbdiided land [ 3 8) Contour lines related to a city—established bench— ' mark at 2—foot intervals for 0-10% grades greater than ia% I I APPLtcATX0N CHtCKLIST -» page 3 I � • 9) The .pose, location, type and size o : ll of the following (within and adjacent to the proposed » subdivision) [ • a) Public and private right—of—ways and easements C 1 b) Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines I c) Domestic 'water mains 'including fire hydrants C d) Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volt or greater) C 1 e) Watercourses C 1 • Deed reservations. f) for parks, open space, pathways and other land encumbrances C 10) Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe'' sizes indicated [ 11) Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and fire hydrants. C : 12) Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished , grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable bd distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision.a.. a. °.v's`on. C 7 13) scaled cross sections of proposed street right—of—way;y, C � 14) The location f all areas subject to inundation or n J storm water overflow C 15) Location, width, and direction of flow of all Water-- courses and drainage ways C 16) The proposed lot configurations, approximate lot dimensions and lot numbers. Where losts are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots [ 17) The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or . 1 greater measured at 4 feet above ground level, and the location of proposed tree plantings, if any C I 10) The existing uses of the property, including the location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting C 10) Supplemental information including! a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ( 1 b) Proof of property ownership C I c) Apr o po s d plan for p rovision of subdivision improvements C I 20) E tisti:ng 'natural features including rock out-'- croppings, wet t 1 Hands and marsh areas 21) If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably , be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated 'into a narrative and submitted with the application. C I 1) Other Information C 3. wrn..er.w.wwrlw'Q (262P/00280) S O D E P 1 APPLICATION CNEGKLI '1— Page 4 6 0cRr bI • St) r Od s0`C r ge6A bbd r 2/0.#1,84 • ' J' f SE L/4 S I/4 SECTION 33 "Ts IS RI W 1 WASHINGTON COUNTY OREEGO I r SEE MAP t5 l33CA 4 + ! r ..., \ (51 3_65) — f S 88°22`28"E ' 0011 s��► 1. o 200 \\\ 10o %' 14.264c. QJ 4_LE .4C. '/ 4'0 q7;.,‘-.-•41' ' /f --••4' '.-per ' r- ' yy + ' CO. ,, 5 84°35.52,,E ;93.43 is 65,14 52 • 52" 52 X52 52 11100 2600 2700 2800 2900. 3000 3 I1OOJ t 143 142 N 141 :., i 24 25 26 27 28,---- 4S9t �! '.ice: 63 52' S2'v2' S^i' g2� Rr325• F_ 8.525 cs _ 0 .i u*S ASH - . ,1120 0 �t s .3,,'- 72.9e , `- e2.4r �(5'e b�q' 4 n 144 n 50 '' � 2500 .z..--'-i_.� �o' �. ��s 41 99 4 �2 �:� _ � ��t�$Ofl�� 23 x`7+05 �CO0 4r_ 140 '0 99+ M 1. tiI r, _ 11300 �+ ---� _ 2400 ' 45 ° 44 SEE M A 1 14'- ;a > $, --..+a, Z. ° t I. 3 .CG r --I < [3 2300 4800 4900 _ 11400 g � } 1C.s_ 2'1'399) j 14 10600 a �, 21 ID.0 -- ti 46 47 - i3� R f1'1 1088. 2 N 1°38'52"1= t 70,52 ,,,ia u, 00 n O w CO O �� _ ' 26•64 • ooh - a � p r ® - ';.- -- u) , 9�i 06 00 50 w 'aye ....I `� oe 90 ;4 N N dl°34' 35''E r 'gym 0 w """ O f� � � ,J tse ,� � _ � 505,74 � `", 0•,,�,',,,� y,>,� "� tai 0 0 d'9>. $1,44 (51.44 61,44 6l.44 61 44 61.4,5� G1.4@ rj d L Z><'¢: "53 3, 72.@2 0� cyy, 3T,7e 0 1.7) _•. ,_ N °0 — 0 © a1 WOO 0pO -,�1O O 0O 01 S•YY. � �7 �U '� Vi I 096& • X40 65,99 .,•i y.�,, .eiz Rr�2 61.44 , 61,44 61,44:��_ 61,44 61:44 6144 ""x131.48 1 a Q , � -- 0 VV 1 LION N � AV E N a� w %•, .. 9" C.7w ( •39,@d ," 59 59 59 59 59 59 59•$2".6 96 _ 7T _ _ 60,01 a� a z O '� O O O O 0 0 O '0° 4D (0,� J°w N .0 w - p ¶'L 0 :® 0 50 1 c) O D59 Q p59 O \j\ t�90 59 `� 59 ;f rs'Cl! .'�: ' ,' 114.47 � • � ' • 9 ,09 • '••• • 47 62,50 50,51 50,51 50.51 50.51 50,51 50,51 's, I •lio ni `g,•-'•• 40 42,42 ',.',ip, .ty 1� 1v N 1°34'35" :15V1 e)j C.11 1 O 11 Iw h ze• a1 SW ' C° () /& a,• O 5 O _, 'O p U O Iv 4 N WEST BU R , •_. o, 'a,, O -m t -4 O 0D O c� O a 8 1" 8 --,;,s ca 8 �3. {...' ,„ �, 8$ w ``1� '0.43 +,. - r�'`� 1.)'1' �138'I 50.51 50.51 • R0,5I , 50.61 '50,51 5U,51. 50.51 'l•N 2°.14 27"E y �y 1 l c OD u 85. ° '' ` �� N' � ' �:S•11, ��Eft D�IV 100.0® t ( 8; I, • ry Q+� 5, `01 W°6�, 79,x1 79,19 1�`A g 1;)9.2 .'!.''�. Z tt,' 9 @.'3711.06 ;� ... ,11�� ����. 7S J9 4k h: 100.03 : " o ( 0'S " r.Q fl6.xcs 96t..• ., w°ga' 99.70 "1. (7 • `1. ao .i 09 r 4 (J/ m CR C° ,cy, ,:„...r.....,qr«^-n-"nY'•-,;•r.:..,,..,,-,.ter-.*-ts+v a-�Y,;rn.,-,r,..z....,,,...,..i...r�emhsr ...ry s'.',.�.rr•-�- _ ,�+m^• �. �+•._.. N.,,. ,. I._ r4 �.... a,�..�w.... ....,�, ,_. .a.. ,.� +H..i._—,.. ..Ix,s�.. ..4.• ..�:..:,..,�.,.,.�,..--._ ,.,..�-,::�n...,,.d n 17 .. , „ „„H,„toi,i„,„, ,1, , a . i CITYOFTIQARD f' , OREGON DDar 12, 1988 R . Bose Mary O jed j U.S. �+« of ing & Deve1 nt 4 Multifamily 1,1ousilnIg Division l 520 S.W. Sikh Avenue Po .arEl, x). 97204-1596 1 Dear Ms. Ojeda: , , Ea■ly last week, Mr. Antbah.w Bonfo,44e contacted contactAetd City ofiigad'ss Plarinitlg • mt. and requested that a "Pt:.,x2ii.ssivfa Zoning Le, " yewritten t o f office f that tile • clesigna on it partixrui.ar pawl. of lEillci. in r Tigard liar .d permit a lti-fanai•y litausitig developa nt. l a' The pals, Washy a ton C in r� 2S1 ' ty 4Ry tax lot 101 and 181 33 ), tax ' lot 200, are zoned B-25 (Reside.tial., 25 urii s per acre) c sig at+sd in t City°s CL si Mann for Multiple F'alaily Resi « Thus, such a project would be a11cd within this tore With regaloci to the City's xviii.ew process, a m*,l ti le family saxietit al proposal virotild suit for a Site Develorxierit I a.+aw lizat..i+)rn« Since the Site i�elO nt rim process is an '�traf i. one, it would j .; • J not re a public hleari g. In a,ddliticin to t.1 Site L1ev+el o!piant Be IvItela x quiim nit, a proposal far this par.t.3 culat. site may potentially y require ti Sensitive lands permit, Web., in this case, would be an t ta.'ve ago , k as 'ill (ie. t public parrs ). ` S Ld •r ��nt hams quest, ons or irk. further informat,•. . rrxrn Fl f free to contact at 639 4171. Sar+' '^ p,„, l !r.. { • r 1 Flichael J. Matte i • Plarir�a.r� :fie y ry�I A.G. yy, 4Jl,i s G Bornfo { 13123 SW HciII Blvd,,Pi°,Box 23397,11gard,Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 ` , ,� .. ._, ,..•...... ... , ..•..,.... .� •., .....,+........... .. a ,... i ,.,.... �.,... .... .. ,...� �.y��..+ _..... .., , ....... , .....�. , . .., _ .�. • I...Y.«:�J. �..Jlr�-r...1.�n.4RIMa.?t1 .� ...e+..wl,.« y Jt. a w.e.r.M..t alw s-. N .. a..�a1Nn=-«,+a....:+4F-iM..i..w}�,k.:.:+5<M.1.rd.iJ+?..,4- �..t _JaY i1,4.w�"V_-k11.:3 K-.W:i..N_I...�..:.�+i/Fa.il:+-.GPI..i(•�•.a...Hn.aw..i�.tllF4.l4e-rr7.:i: ' tr• tiff rPjtpEN70, U.S.Dept.of Housing&Urban Development I, k • f.•� 7 t III I • • �6�N OEVE�Q ROSE MARY OJEDA Multifamily Housing Representative Cascade Building 520 S.W.6th Avenue Portland,OR 97204-1596 (503)221-2686 i I , I I. 1; .. I r`. I • � r �I I 11 • C' 1 � S . �w w. ! C ' '. ." U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HDUS I NC AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT c PORTLAND FIELD OFF I CE . 52O SW Sixth Avenue, Portland, , Oregon 97204 . 0 CHECKLIST OF EXHIBITS FOR SITE APPRAISAL AND MARKET ANALYSIS (SFMA) , • !, MULTIFAMILY PROPOSALS , '. We will accept only Proposals that are complete. Please submit one original and 'seven copies c+ each exhibit listed below: 1, i t ' Cover letter c,utl i ni ng, complete proposal , _ Mh 2, vi deuce of Permissive 'Zoning Letter from responsible .' ' planning and zoning officials stating that sub iect site is ' --(! ,,'.� ( 'p y, oned to permit c anticipated, � � , ,,�''� resentl � construction of the a improvements without further public 1 c hear i ng ` . HUD 92c�1 (3/8O) ,, Application Pro iect Mortgage Insurance t + (SPONSOR ENTITY MUST BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED) Follows l instructions on the form. \. �4. HUD 9201" --E., Supplement to HUD 9 013 (y/84) ---- Handicapped f' and elderly projects only 1 f 5N HUD 92013R (1/7E3) , Application for Project Mortgage Insurance `', (Rehabilitation) Rehabilitation projects only (complete Sections A; B, C, D, E, F, G, H, and I) .,.._.. . .: 6 HUD 92010 (1/82) - Equal Employment Opportunity Certification (endorsed) 7. 2530 g �� Previous Participation Certification rM • For m 1 r HUD 2530 must signed all Principals and their _ aff i 1 rates who propose participating in the HUD project. Please carefully review the instructions on the back of the 1 form. 3433 .. as Non-Profit %�, 8. FHA �:�4,��_+ (2/78) .„ Determination of Eligibility Sponsor or Mortgagor (if pl .cabl e) i , • , 9. Location map with site located Cher-Pori .i io Evidence of site control (option (3t- pLtrch se) ' •• 1.3 Va l _11 . 81.=;etch plan of site with al 1 di rnensi dhs shown i, location o f ; proposed structures,., streets, parking areas ah i drives', , servi co areas, play z- rt ss site drawings (if completed) 1 I 12. -Ev i dehce of last 8rrrts--1.ertgth si tee put-chase and price including a certification by sponsor- that evidence submitted { ' in response to this item reflects last arms-length 'purchase 4 price . , Y k 1� . Evidence to suppt r•t mar =:etabi 1,i ty of the proposal 1 ,, .1. First AIttlerican'Title Insurance Ccii.„ipany of Oregon . an assumed business name of TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF OREGON • . 310 SW FOURTH`' AVENUE, PORTLAND, OR 97204-2376 (503) 222-3651 • FAX(503)222.7274 Preliminary Title Report November 23, 1 9 8 8 ALTA Owners Stand.Cay. $ Premium$ ALTA Owners Ext.Cov. $ 750,9 3 2 00 Premium$ 4188 a 50 ALTA Lenders Stand.Cov $ Premium $ • ALTA Lenders Ext.Coy. $ Premium$ Order No 6 0 3 6 2 3 Indorsement . Premium • • Other Cost $ a Re Krueger/8 o n f or t e Govt.Serv.Charge Cost $ 15 .00 2ND REV:Z 8 ED REPORT A consolidated statement of all charges and advances in con- . nection with this order will be provided at closing. First American Title Insurance Company of Oregon • 310 S.W. Fourth Avenue Portland, Oregon 97204-2376 Attention: Sandra L. Simmons Telephone No, : 222-3651 We ` are prepared to issue Title Insurance 1:?o1.icy or 1Polia:ies'; in • the form and amount shown above, insuring title to the following , described land: For legal description see 2nd Revised Exhibit "A" attached hereto; • and as of November 15, 1988. at__8, 00< a.m. title vested _i For vesting see Revised Exhibit "By' attached here to; ., Subject � Sub- e ,t ty o the exceptions,ons excy lusion s and nd s tipulations which are I ordinarily part of such Policy form and t h e fallowing: 1 Taxes or assessments Which are Plot shown as existing; liens by t e r recods of any taxy g n authority that leva.es taxes or i assessments on real property or by the public records; by p agency may proceeci.in s b a ublie a enc which may resialt in taxes or ' ;+ asses8 nts, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not �y theme P, ;s1'><a�tn r records of such agency or by the public ,records. 2. nylfa recorights btinterest, or claims which are not shown by An ' fact. p but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry, of persons in ^. possession thereof. , 3 , Easements, encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the public records; reservations or` exceptions in patents or' in ;:acts 1 ' thereof, water rights; claims or title' authorizing the i,�st�ance Cher.,., g to water, r; Tfri"y report port is for the exclusive use of the parties herein shown and is prelimIriary to the issuarice of a title Instlrahce policy and shall become void tibias a policy Is issued,and the lull ptel iltirri paid, ' • I f r, I • • • • , Page 3 "" Order No. 366203 .,:. • The terms and provisions of the above Option were amended by ! 1 instrument Recorded : November 9, 1987, Fee No. 87056193 • 13. Resolution ; No. 2440 f' : . Recorded April 7, 1 983, Fee No. 8301 1702 P • For : Establishing the Weir Trunk Sanitary Sewer Improvement District We are unable to determine the exact location. a` 4 U 1 P leases, if any.corded l . n 15 This report does not include a search for Financing Statements 1 f filed in the office of the Secretary of State, or in a county ' other than the county wherein the premises are situated and no 1 liability is assumed if a Financing Statement is! filed in the office of the Cointy Clerk (Recorder) ,,covering crops on the premises wherein the lands are described other than by metes and r the rectangular survey system or b.. recorded lot " bounds or under �. e r g Y y by , and block. 1 16. � 'Rights I public and of governmental bodies in and. to that portion of the ref , , 9` of the overnmen �. p premises G' described lying below the high �-. ,. ns:s bel,o . water marls of nnamed�~, he rea.n des gibed 1 zn a creek. f_ A.' 17 Terms provisions and conditions o f the Trust Agreements reements and any subsequent modifications, dated December 1978 and May wherein Margery F. Krueger is Settlor, a copy of which should be submitted to this office for inspection. e 18. Due administration of the Conservatorship of Gerald Vincent Rtsel. a protected arson, Probate No. 7922 o P P'� 22 `whit±h proceedings, S are Pending in the Circuit Court f -y., Lewis p in for Benton Count ; Russell and, Beggy Belie Ayres w appointed - Conservators and z were a �o�.nted Co ( ' has power to e ecute the forthcoming Conveyance. Attorney for conservator. Steven. H Smith. " NOTE: The herein described premises lie within the ,Tualatin 1 Hills Pa rk and Recreation District 1 267 filed A ust 5 1 982 ,I : Washington y d�.i�tai�ce No. 267, g � r'� • NOTE: Cciun'f«yunOrsgon, imposes a tax of $1 .00 per $1 / 000.00 or fraotioiri thereof on the tran8 fer of real Property i located within hin Washington � � otrit � Certain conveyances may be exempt from said O;rdinance/ i r which 1 case, Washington County will reauare the filing o f an affidavit of etemption,o xn either situations the transfer tax must be paid or an affidavit mu t be filed, h, I 4 r I f r r rr r ::• • THIS MAP IS FURNISHED AS A CONVENIENCE IN LOCATiING'""'riOPERTY AND THE COMPANY • '. ' s" 1 LIABILITY FOR ANY VARIATIONS AS MAY 13 ' ,:CLOSE®BY ACTUAL SURVEY ..' ASSUME( �I' _`" 4% `'"','4 'First American can Titre Insurance ce Company of Orego a�� .•'' "' •. , on nssua»id lbusinsUU nsnre oi'PTTtE INSUPJLNCE COMIPANY Ofd OflEOON :,I: �- ,310 S.W+ FOURTH AVENUE, PORTi,aAND,OR 97204 .: "`• !'•.. 503 X,2"3651 ..",.:=-....='.. 1 SEC ' '. . y 3'3 T1$ R,3iw 4 • ,�.rW�wr++ .1 + `� 240 ,k 1":?,„. ,, i."..''';�1,•M-t r' i • '1•'l l l i •I 1 Pt ^.., , * y . 1 I .•• .•• 11 C i ! I t F! 1 z: 2647.03 2700 280x1 2980 3000 3100 i �';1 X 24 25 28 ' I 213 29 $ ill• y '. i 1 c. , : 1 54. , ,:5.•a t 2500 lit. so' '123 4600 4''x00 ' e ''''''.1 1 4 4 . . '' I 2400 � l lr 'SEE 14" I • ea, , • '4...z.,•2•. "r��' 1 1 ,.:,:, kS,1 '.4.31x- 230Q , 1 -- , 21 • �' 4 X00 500 ,' a! + i I 1 r;it x ; : .iir " , c, 1 sLvist Y i:. , i• , • •,,,4,'� t. 000 '. •°' seco. 70o ly4s{✓,!, } • s .', ,•!§4,',...../ i l !I it ,•i ' ;F !• i ,.%" 1' , i ■ , 2 17, ♦ 1 • ••• ,,'♦ .. 11s era '', ,. 0 : is:;o 170o 's' w,.,l, «•.1 ti• 000 1200 110.. ......6.,■ . ., 1500' $ '41 �, I 12 it ip :' 9 � t ii! , . • R 1 )I Rd'�Q �_'•L DR� �� dt� ii 1 +j,, 854)0 6600 67L)0 sear G * g 7 •1. 't C.8 III' a•� �,,� + i'�, \ fts.V7.1f,'. . SW, °;:" ,•.MORN 1 4. • 1 i , 4I li a1il N 4 ,, ' 8$0O 84013, I';., eci= � F Y II I 4 '! ,ill •„ i '� � .. Je , ' .18 ,11 . v. '!4)v ! i Y , Ok/1+ • 1 r a I , , • I 7 , , . . r , , " . . , . r . 1 , 1 . ,.,. , , . , , . . A.- P.Es'LI.C,A,.T1..ON. 1.4OR S11'.1—, DEVELOPMEANT . . 1 • A. / FOR" . , . MiTLIT FAMILY PRO, RI CT . I t I I iP , a t, . . a "+w t // •11 , t II- ...r I � " • , , , . , ,, , , , , , , . . , ,. k • I • i', • T T , O E( O ) 8 1 . , t . rG1bitfvc�tt�.;.p.'0, F I 1+155 541 flcoilE f irk F 9 ukiiri3 y{s,ctiutaaske . .xe I sns �t tut k. I Jar+ .1,d 1V r, rj1'9aG1)�`) X57 '!. 25�'etStinf 1 dy k KitiMtid,WA i3ea t3(MI W.41411 i M 4 WOODSIDE VI1LAGE r , ,.. Table of Contents I. Statement of Intent '. II. Site Development Approval Criteria M. Juslafica,ticanl for Additaanal. Centerline Setback Variance IV. Justification for Lot Line Adjustment ' V. Pre-Application Checklist & Index VI. Soils Report VII r Impact L VII. Traffic C� .�al SILS VIII. Site Plan I � II ' 1 � :1j• jyy � n y. I 1 t¢+}{a n iy" L STA 1,1�M,ENTOF INTENT • I ' The intent of t�xs a p P tx' application r st receive�e site development ent r eview 7 approval for �,. • µ 290-unit multi-family project including two recreation buildings of 3500 square feet and 3000 ,,�� • square feet. Parking will be provided,for 522 cars. 117 of the parking spaces will be in garages with an additional 202 spaces in, carports. The application also includes a request . .. I' for a lot line adjustment which will result in 14.89 arcel for the apartments a.t 1 p p r menu and a parcel of 143,640 square feet for future development. In addition, a variance from the requirement of subsection 1.8.96.020 (additional centerline setback) is being requested. uu - I.f I. SUE D E W P N T i CHAP.t ER 18♦92 Density Computation: The gross acreage of the subject property, after allowance for tla. . e amount to be dedicated for right-of-way within the lot line adjustment, is acres. 'r he Scholls Ferry Road is .304 acres. The amount to be proposed for on-site private iv'te streets is 2.93 acres. The remainder is the net development area which is 11.66 acres. The R-25 Zoning District requires 1480 square feet of net development area per unit. This would result in the site being capable of having 343 units, CI AI TEI 18.144 144 AC C SS STRUCTURES: The proposed apartment development will include the following accessory structures or uses: 23 Carports covering 117 parking spaces 15 Garages enclosing 202 parking spaces l 2 Recreation buildings of 3500 square feet and 3000 square feet 9 Trash enclosures m 2 Swimming pools 1 Voile ball court 1 Sports court accessory r that will allow the apartment complex All of these accesso uses or structures ar ern the re items t are to be more useful while not altering residential character of the principal structures. They y apartment projects.• tznent ro ect Th e are also uses that are common.i found in a ar CHAP'1 R 18.96 ADDITIONAL YAK AREA. REQUIREMENTS: Subsection 18:96.020 requires a greater setback from the l centerline of certain streets in order to assure improved light,air and sight distance and to protect the public health,safety and welfare. "T1xxs subsection provides for an additional setback of 50 feet from the centerline of Scholls Ferry Road. This setback is in addition to the 20-foot setback requirement of the R-25 zoning district which results in a total setback of 70 feet from the centerline of Scholls Ferry Road. The proposed setback is 65 feet from the centerline of in another part Scholls Ferry Road. �A variance from this provision is addressed xn�;detail in • of this report • { • I Subsection provides coon 1$.96.030 a p multi-family residential ides for minimum setbacks between multi-fa structures. The maximum building setback required is 25 feet between buildings with ., i windowed walls facing each other. Subsection 18.96.030(b) requires buildings over 60 feet height to have a separation of 1 foot for each 15 feet of in�length or exceeding 30 feet in g p ' building length over fifty feet and two feet of separation for each ten feet of building height over 30 feet. The longest and tallest building proposed is 250 feet long and 40 feet tall. .. Subsection 18.96.030(b) requires this buildin g type to have a separation of 13.3 feet for its � length and 2 feet for its height for a total of 15.3 feet. The minimum building separation r for any of the multi-family structures proposed is 25 feet which meets or exceeds all of the requirements of both Subsection 18,96.030(a) I nd 18.96.030(b). Subsection 18.96.030(c) requires driveways and parking lots to be separated frorn windowed 1 wails by at least 8 feet and walkways running parallel to the face of structures to be " separated by at least 5 feet. The proposed site plan provides a minimum separation of at A ° least ten feet of separation between parking areas and windowed walls and in most cases • h the separation is in excess of 20 feet, No walkways are proposed to run parallel to the face of any structures. µ C IAP'1'ER 18.98 BUILDING HEIGHT LIMITATIONS-EXCEPTICaNS rJTlis section does not apply to the proposed development as we are not proposin g " development on a flag lot p g or a non-residential zone. The height restrictions of Section 18.56.050 4 limit any buildings to ' � °g restrictions ( ) � y ` g o a rnaxizr�urn of 45 feet. The tallest structure proposed is 40 feet, CHAPTER 18.100 LANDSCAPING,AND SCREENING } This chapter provides general provisions for landscaping g ard screening as well as specific M . standards for the location of street trees, buffering and screening. The general provisions include standards for tnaiiitenance and installation. The specifi., C , standards for street tree installation includes size and spacing requirements including ` g p yy lighting standards for locating trees in proximity to utilities, hard surfaces'and l� htiix fixtures. The buffering and screenin . standards include a n�irimuirri level of screening and buffering � Y along property lines between specific zoning districts. In the case of the subject property all of the surrounding properties are zoned similar to the subject property. The buffer matrix found und..t1. Section 1..8.1D:.0Y.1 0. (a) requires a 5 foot buffer between properties erties zones F- Subsection 18.x00 x.10 provides special screening for such area s as within and aronnd p ar ktn g areas swimming pools and service facilities. �+ The provisions of this chapter have been implemented in the laidscape plan prepared as part of this submittal r , CHAP'T'ER 18.102 VISUAL CLEARANCE AREAS I - { This chapter provides standards to assure proper site distances at intersections in order to reduce the hazard from vehicular turning movements. The standards provide for a 35-foot visual clearance triangle from accessways over 24 feet wide intersecting artexial streets and 30 foot visual clearance triangles for intersections with non-arterial streets. Although Washington County has recently designated Scholls Ferry Road a collector street, Tigard still considers Scholls Ferry Road as an arterial. For this reason we will provide visual clearance triangles of 35 feet in each direction for both accesses to Scholls Ferry Road. This chapter does not address visual clearance areas for internal intersections. However, the landscape plan and building locations provide for adequate visual clearance for all intersections an turning movements. . CPI AP!LR 18,106 OFF-STREET � [ 4.G AND LOADING I f . . Fh z s cha p ter provides standards to assure that parking areas are designed gned to have adequate capacity and are appropriately located to rninirnize any hazardous conditions both on-site µ and at access points. 'rile general provisions specify minimum parking space dimensions for compact,ac t standard and handicapped stalls as well as provisions for shared parking, «. p bicycle parking and parking lot lighting. ' The parking requirements addressed in Subsection 18.106.030, re q uire 1.5 spaces for each 1-2 bedroom unit, with one space covered and 2 spaces for each unit with more than 2 bedrooms,with 1 space being covered. Section 18.106.040 allows 25 percent of the required . • spaces to be compact.act. The proposed unit count includes 276 1 or 2 bedroom units and 14 EI , p P p p would require a total of 442 4 • .. The of . .. 3-bedroom. units which q is, 42 parking spaces, e total amount o parking g provided spaces, red._T'he.total amount arkin rovided is 522 s aces which is 80 spaces more than required. of allowable compact spaces is 110 while 107 are being provided. All parking stalls are proposed to be at 90 degrees from the aisles and all aisles are a minimum of 25 feet widen Bicycle parking is provided at individual units and at both`recreations buildings. !` CHAPTER'. 18.108: ACCESS; EGRESS AND CmCULA1-ION, This chapter provides standards for safe and efficient vehicle access and egress on the site „ and of general circulation within the site. Specific standards in:... c lude i access to residential al structures, pedestrian connections fro m residential uni ts to vehi cular parlding areas, .” minimum access standards and minimum driveway specifications,. F 1 ;. +j ❑ } uy� { I Subsection 41 j .. within • ` { I 'on 1,8.1a8�040 requires vehicular access be provided to within 50 feet of all structures: The proposal satisfies this requirement by providing parking stalls wiethIn or aisles within 30 feet of all structures: • . I -_...'....:..,.,1 rr.,...:c;'y,,a a..,.•......,ur..,.,.....a .. ..:,.•.... ....;... r.,... I. ".:., u.r,.•.. _ r...r-. ,..., - ,u..:i z. , .. r.... . ,., Subsection 18.108.050 requires 4 foot wide minimum walluvay to be constructed from all residential units to vehicular parking, common open space and recreational facilities. Such . [ r• a network of walkways is proposed as part of the development. . Subsection 18.108.070(b) requires a minimum of 2 driveways for the first 100 units and 1 driveway for each additional 100 units. This would require a minimum of 3 driveways for ' proposed• p : p ,Scholls Ferry Road s to access drives the develo ynent. The site plan indicates two acc Ives to Scholls and a third fire department only emergency access S.W.W. Morning Hill Drive to the east. L The Traffic Report prepared by I‹.ittelson and Associates,Inc. concludes that the two access drives to Sch.olls Ferry Road will be sufficient with the backup emergency only access to Morning Hill Drive. Subsection 18.108.070(b) also s ecifies that all access drives shall have a minimum paved surface of 24 feet for two way traffic and shall have curbs and a 5-foot walkway. All of the proposed drives will be two-way and will be a minimum of 24 feet in width, CHAPTER 18.114: SIGN This chapter provides standards will�. � P P � " ..lords to'ensure sign programs that wi protect the health, safety, property and. Y improve e the effectiveness of�sx signs in identifying the advertising true appear } .1 I [ e c welfare of the public improve the neat, clean, orderly and attractive .. of ance of the o ty; P g fyr g j'� t location erection � 9 f, construction, A. • , tan and maintenance of signs; businesses provide for safe �const. prevent proliferation of signs an design clutter; and minimize adverse visual safety factors to public highway travelers. No s p ecific signing program has been established for the proposed apartment project. CONCLUSION The proposed development appears to meet all of the applicable standards of the Zoning Ordinance with the exception of 18.96.020 from which we have requested a variance. 7 The number of units proposed is only 84:5% of that allowed based on the computations of Chapter 18.92. The amount of parking is in excess of the minimum standards by 80 spaces or 18.1% Y proposed development sets all units a minimum of r y from any The pro units app ox�.cxiatel 80 feet f adjacent property which is 400% greater than that required: It s. been given to the design should be clear that much care has bee of this project to minimize any possible adverse ' • p in vicinity y p rse effect on any current or future developments in the vxcrn� and that the Po'Je project provide living. will rovide a desirable and safe livin environment for its tenants. • �, r a � • o f'y' • Ill. JUS i I.F ICAAT ION FOR FRONT 'AE.D SETBACK VARIANCE As mentioned previously, Subsection 18.96.020 of the Tigard Zoning Ordinance requires an additional setback of 50 feet from the centerline of Scholls Ferry Road. This setback is in addition to the 20-foot setback required by the R-25 zoning district. The resultant 70- foot setback from the centerline of Scholls Ferry Road is 5 feet greater than the 65 feet provided by our proposed site plan. The setback from the front property line is proposed which is th to be 20 feet whi the normal setback for the R-25 zoning district. � - The 50-foot additional setback is required by Subsection 18.96.020 as Scholls Ferry Road'' is classified as an arterial street by the zoning ordinance and until recently by the Washington County Transportation Plan. Of the five streets classified by the Tigard Ordinance as arterials, only Scholls Ferry Road a n d Pacific Highway have a SOfoot additional centerline setback while Hall Boulevard, UPPer Booties Ferry Road and Durham Road have a 45-foot additional centerline setback. The recently adopted revisions to the Washington. County Functional Classification System Ferry Ferry major collector classification while upgrading Old have downgraded Scholls Fer Road to a ma or c Scholls t rry Road to :a major arterial classification. If the Tigard Ordinance were amended to be in line with the recent changes the additional centerline setback would be p reduced to 30 feet which would result in a total setback from centerline of 50 feet. Based on the above information it can be shown that the proposed variance meets the criteria listed in Subsection. 18.134.050 for granting a variance in the following manner: proposed materially the purposes . . es of 1) The ro osed variance will not be znatczzall detrimental to th p rp o policies 1 the Tigard Zoning Ordinance, be in conflict with the o1ic�.e, of the Comprehensive Plan, to any other applicable policies and standards and to other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity. ..... The purpose of the required additional setback from the centerline is to permit or afford better light, air and vision clearance on more heavily traveled streets, to make the location of structures compatible with the need for th e eventual widening of streets and to assure adequate distance between buildings on the site, f The reduction in the required additional setback from 50 feet to 45 feet will not negatively affect the amount of air or light available to c g y g h e property or adversely affect the vision clearance from the entrance drive to or from Scholls Ferry Road. It will also not affect the distance between , . buildings on the site The widening of Scholls Ferry Road is being provided for the proposed development and the dedication required by the State Highway Department of 45 feet froze. centerline will be made i 2) There are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to tho subject i • � � � "c�. the applicant has no property and other properties in the same zoning district over wiz control. The circumstances over which the owners of the subject property and other properties in the vicinity have no control is the fact that the Tigard Zoning Ordinance does not reflect the current status of Scholls Ferry Road as recently revised by Washington County. This revision has changed the status of Scholls Ferry Road in the vicinity of the . subject property from an amount of reduce� I the 50 feet to 30 feet. Amending the e additional centerline setback from �' additional setback to � p p y za. arterial to a collector which would r additional g e additia reflect to current classification would remove the need for the variance. 3) The use proposed will be the same as permitted under the zoning code and . Ci ty of Tigard standards will be maintained to th e g reatest extent that is reasonable possible, while permitting some economic use of the land. it P permitting Granting of the variance will not result in any change in the allowable uses • M. in the R-25 zoning district. In addition all other standards of the zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan can be met with or without approval of this request. 4) Ex stin gphysical and natural systems,stems such as but not liznaited to traffic, • ) drainage, dramatic land forms or parks, will not be adversely affected any more than would occur if the development were located as specified in the zoning ordinance. No existing trees or land form will be affected by the reduction in the setback. Adequate site distance will be provided from and to the site and Scholls Ferry Road, 5) The hardship not self-imposed and the variance hardship 'is 'im ose p riaince requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship, The hardship is due to a change in the classification of Scholls Ferry Road which is not reflected in the Tigard Zoning Ordinance as it deals with additional centerline setbacks. The requested variance would not be needed ld if,the change were reflected in the , ordinance and the additional centerline setback for Scholls Ferry Road were appropriate for the new classification. IV. JUS'I.;11-+ICA:TnON FOR PROPOSED LOT LrieiE ADJUSTMENT The proposed lot line adjustment will result in p p � j � two parcels of 14.59 acres and 1.002 acres after dedication for the future widening of S.W.'Scholls Ferry Road. The 14,59 acre parcel will be the site of the proposed Woodside Village multi-family project while the 1.002 acre parcel will be left undeveloped until a later conditional use request will be made P for a day care center. The existing structures found on the existing tax lot 500 of 151 33 CC. will be removed as part of the development of the `Woodside Village j g apart project. set- backs, minimum lot site and other applicable sections of the Tigard Zoning Ordinance Y can be satisfied by approval of the lot line adjustment. t tr.ttm.... vt ttnr t.,yr r.r..t I.,. n7+rt nrr t.a aunxttun. xf uan.vta rv.wnw..su wv..x.inn nt to nttn at., x ttr .r..t .v..t...0 t... t s.Itunat..n. .1.tN tt • .u. Al ttr.rv,.w •v•u.t.t N..wmtt t,.. ,ntu went tv .ua. x.t.N.,•r .u.. ..I r+tr. , , • INDEX OF APPLICABLE APPLICATION CHECKLIST 'TEMS . Where To • Be Pound BASIC 1/IA`1EB.L ,]C,S • A) Application Forms . • : I • • I. • . • • . • • • . • • . • . • Separate B) Owner's,Signatures • . • • • . . . • . . . • ... • . On Application C Title Transfer Instrument : ' . D) Assessor's laps • . • • • • • • i • • • . . • • : • • • . , • • With Application. .. Site P lan • In Narrative I . F) Applicant's Statement (Code Compliance) • 1 • • • • . • . . In Narrative ' G) List of ro Property Owners and Addresses . . . . . . . • . : . . With Application • fi} Filing Fee • i • Y • , . . . . . . . . . • : . • •' `With Application • SPEC.;f Ic M.A'rE .s 1 A) Site Infcrrnation Site size & dimensions • : • 1 • • • • 11 • i i 1 : • Y • : • • , • M • • • • • • SD-2 1/ . 1 3) Contour lines a 0 • il • • Yi • • oi • •1• . • • 6 Y • to I• ii . • tl . .'• • • 4YiY SD-2 • 4) Drainage patterns, courses & ponds : ' • • . , • •`: : Y , : . : . . • , • SD-2 1 1 7) Trees with 6'1+ ;caliper at 4' from ground level : SD-1; SD-2 . 8) Location of existing Isti.lictiires • . : . • . Y i : i . : i • . : , , SD-1; SD-2 • 10) Location'of' exi S sti g uti lit'i es : • . . Y . • • Y • . i i i . . • • • i : • SD-5 , 11) Location of existing dedicated right-of-ways i i . : : . .1 i i Y : SD-5 B) Site Developrri.e it plan l 1 nd�� i � : 8D,-1 .r Proposed site & s`u �'ot� properties' , i . . • , 3 I. • • i . 1) P oI os x � p P . I 2) Contour ne interals Y , i � i L i li • . i : i Y Y i i i i ii i : • : T A r �`he e To Be Found 3) The location, dimensions and names of all a) Existing $� P 1 att e d streets & other public c ways and easements on the site and on adjoining properties • . . • ._• • • . • . : . • SD-2 b) Proposed streets or other public ways and easements on. the site • • : . SD-2, SD-5 4) Location and dimensions of a) Entrance and exists on the site . • . . ♦ . . • , . • • • • SD-3 L b) Parking and circulation areas . . • • • • • , . • ♦ . . SD-3 c) Loading and services areas . . . • . . . . . . . • p . . . : SD-3 d) Pedestrian and I bicycle circulation • • • • . ♦ ♦ . • . . . • • SD-7 e) Outdoor common areas l. • . . , . . SD-7 i f): Above ground utilities • : • i . • • • ♦ . • • . . . . SD-5 5) The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: I a) Existing permanent structures, iinprovenients utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site . . . . a . a ♦ , i . i . . . i • i . : .!.. . . . SD-1' i b) Proposed structures, improvements utilities i I I I �y and easements on the site . � . . � . i . . . . : . . : : • : . . : • SD-5 6) Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream • conditions 7) Sanitary sewer facilities . : : . i • . • : : 4 SD-5 8) The location of areas to be landscapes : . : : : . : . : : , . . . : : SD-7 I , I I 9) The location and type of outdoor lighting i i • : : . . . : . . , i i . . SD-6 11) The location of all structures and their orientation i : : : • i r : : i i i i ., i :• • • • i i • : • • : : • • SD-3, SD-7 2 i I 1 I I i i 1 • • • • Where T • h o Be Found . . C. n • • The sit e development plan shall include a g radin g F lan a at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and : contain follow n information: shall coma i� the following � . 1) The location and extent to which grading will t t ake place indicating general contour lines, • • slope ratios and soil stabilization proposals p 1 stab�l��atian proposal , . . . . . . . . . . . SD-4 • L 2) A statement from a registered stered en ineer supported by data factual substantiating:: • • b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm . . drainage service proposals 7 i L' c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they are to be mitigated D. Architectural Drawings ;• [ The site development plan proposal shall include: 1) Floor p la n s indicating n d icdtx n the square footage g e of i proposed . : ■ . . A- -10 all structure ro� osed for use on-site , . : . 1 - 2) Typical elevation drawings of each structure . • : : . . • A-1, A-2 A-4, A-6` A-8, A-10, A-12, & A-13 E.> Landsca e Flan The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale i of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1) Description of the irrigation s y y stens where alx FF cd SD-7 ble . . « » 2) ]Location and height of fences, buffers S screenings ; . y » . : y SD-7 3) 1_,ocatlon of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas and common open areas , 4 . : « i 4 : • SD-7 3 iI i 1 •• • 'V�Jhexe Tc Be Found 4) Location, type, size and_species of existing and proposed plant material . . . . , . . • . . . . SD-7 G. Traffic Generation on Estiq mate . . . .• . . Trafic Report LH. .1c`re1iminary lot line adjustment map showi 1) Owners of the subject propel . • . . . . . . ) • On Lot Line Map 3) Map scale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . On Lot Line Map 4) Description of parcel . . . . • . . • . • . . . . . • . . . On Lot Line Map 5) Location width and names of streets adjacent • to parcel . . • . • . . . . . . . . . . On Lot Line Map 6) Location of all permanent buuilduags on or within 25' of all property line On Lot Line Map ll ro er line . . . . . . . . . . . •. „. . r .„. i. A y Y 9 r RECEIVED JA . I I . JOHN McDGNALD ENGINEERING l SOILS-CIVIL,-GEOTECI-INICAL Ground-Penetrating RADAR 10116 S.E.STANLEY AVENUE PORTLAND,OREGON 97222 (503)774-4077 .; i r. . JanUarY 7r 1989 . • OTAK, Inc 17355 SW Boones Ferry Road PO Box Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035 SOILS INVESTIGA L TION AT COTSWALD MEADOWS NO.4 Cotswald Meadows No.4 is located on the east side of New Scholls Ferry Road just north of the proposed eastward extension ' of Murray Mursa Y Boulevar d and is just west of Wilton Street. This site was formerly planned for single family houses but is now planned r for apartments. The site slopes very gently down toward the north and is centered around a shallow swale. The Washington County Soil L y shows Cornelius and Kinton soil in the highest Survey show. combined Parts+ of the site, Cascade soil on the slopes of the swale and lDelena soil in the swale bottom. ... Five bo�ehh oles were made with continuous sampling at p P n on Sketch. n representative areas as shown on the attached Ex lora Soil samples were given hand classification tests to decide whether they were of silty or clayey nature. The soil colors p plates were compared with the standard Munsell soil colors later foL clues to the soil moisture regime and to relate to the Soil Survey findings. Borehole #1 was made in the middle of the swale on about the ., extended centerline of SW Ash'bury Lane at a survey marker labeled PC 206 . 0 to 1' bark grayish brown silt with ra g y th roots 1 to 2 ' Silt, dark grayish brown with dark yellowish brown mottles 2 to 5 ° Clay, very dark gray black color, stiff 5 to 6 ° Clay trend t o dark grayish b rown color, stiff 6 to 9 ' Clayey silty dark greenish gray, almost dry, with water above 9 to 10 ' Trend to dark gray Silt, moist End borehole at 10 depth Borehole 42 was made in the northeast area next to a survey marker labeled PRC Lot, 182: 0 to 9 ' Brown silt b 9 to 10 ' Brown fine sandy Silt End borehole at 10 depth. II ,, ..r... . •.,. r „r�,... ...,. .. . r r.. r r. r rr ...,,r.. rr..,. .,.....r.r. ..,.....r .,.,..I.r.,r..., r... ......,,.,.. ..... ..... ..re,..rr .. . • .v 2 4 Borehole #3 was made in the watery woods area on about the extended centerline of SG Morning Hill Drive next to a survey marker labeled PC Lot 156 . 0 to 1 Brown silt 1 ' Water starts 1 to 4 ° Clay, brownish gray with dark yellowish brown filaments 4 to 5' Silt, grayish brown with dark yellowish brown mottling, trending to clay with depth • 5 ' Dark yellowish brown iron concretions 5 to 10' Silt, dark greenish gray, trending to dark gray color with depth, 8 . 8 ' and 9 ' 1/2" layers of black organics End borehole at 10 ' depth. A' iBorehole #4 was made in the southwest corner next to a survey marker labeled Lots 220 , 221. 0 to 1 ' Silt, dark brown, with organics 1 to 10' Brown silt 5 . 5' Brown silt with faint dark yellowish brown mottled for a few inches 8 .5' Pass a small stone End borehole at 10 ' depth Borehole #5 was made along the extended centerline of SW Ashbury Lane nest to a survey marker labeled 201,202. t' 0 to 10 ° Brown silt 4.5 ' Pass a small stone 9 ' Soil becomes wet End borehole at 10 ' depth. . DISCUSSION Cornelius arx FCintan soils typically have a pronounced mottled layer at from 3 to 5 feet of depth. #5 expected to be like tips but they had almost no visible �oreholes '#2 and • would be exp � y le still c�., in the soil . Wothing mottling In the Cascade soil the mottled layer is stilt was pronounced but is higher Pp � ° c �ale, p `� up q s which are supposed to be in the s w � found. Delena soils, wh ,. contain silty clays but are much lighter in color than what was Y Y y found on the site. My op' ' ale .are opinion is that the soils in the swale like the descriptions of Verboort or Cove soils. of interest � because their inf�.uence The znterest a.n the soil types is Yp b on soil moisture conditions and possible expansive characteristics. Soils with mottled layers can have perched water tables that need to be drained off to prevent wet crawl spaces and basements. The on-site findings, however, are that a es straight ht downward p�rce�l � g over much of the site the rainwater, at to the deeper water table and will Present no problems. r In the south part of the Swale area the water appears to be concentrated on or near the surface. Once this is intercepted •o Y ' w / 4 T •r 1. • 3 wh r. ...:I.0 i.... .:ur-..«w..>.._.....::♦:, ......,+._Y.1 w....a..4....._ ,.Y ... r.''�. ..-. .....«: ....nr • .... wr. .. a .r.. 1 4i.1... .a 1. •1 i}'..-fW... and put into a storm drain the swale will dry out. The sharp break to the dark greenish gray color in Boreholes #1 and #3 s this art of the soil has been constantly •.•�� indicates that at lea, t y ind p covered with water. E„ The soils are all sufficiently firm, to support two and three i ` ' story buildings, even with the present wet conditions in the swale area. The main question is whether after the swale is dried out the potentially expansive clay soils will start to cause problems when they get wet each winter, 1 RECOMMENDATIONS r 1. In m Y opinion inion the entire site is suitable for supporting two an d three story apartments on spread footings. The e. recommended maximum soil be arin g 'p ressure is 2 ,000 Pounds Per cubic foot. 2 . A shallow cutoff trench about two feet or so deep should be made, . in the swale area along the south property line to get into y The trench • and it into the storm drain system. T collect water should be lined with nonwoven filter fabric, have a perforated erfarated [,,,, pipe inside, and be filled to six inches from the top with rounded drain rock with the filter fabric folded over the top of the drain rock. . 3 p' For pavements in the swale areas where clay soils are encountered the subgrade below the base course should be undercut by at least 18 inches and backfi lied with silt, sand, or gravel compacted to at least 95 percent of ASTM D698 density. 4 . For building foundations in the swale areas where clay soils are encountered the subgrade is to be thoroughly soaked a With water before forms are placed, and kept`wet until finally covered by concrete of this . y ete slabs or bat clay backfill. lra. lieu the y inches and backf it dense �.�.led with de n may be undercut b gravel compacted to at least 95 percent of ATM graded crushed gra p p. D698 density. t. 5 . Retaining walls that are attached to building components 1 • I . should be designed for an equivalent fluid density of fifty pounds per cubic foot. tree--standing retaining walls may be designed for an equivalent fluid density of forty 'pounds per cubic foot. n Very truly yours, rir '''\,3 (5,,,,,-\ .l V!, ,.4:."' ice: .....}— .,,,,#)///) • a . c'. • • Borehole #2 r 4,, Borehole 5 • ; i Borehole #1 SW,Ashbury Lane �, i Scale: 1 1"_ 200' • 1 Wilton.n S treet • • r w Borehole #3 SW Morning Hill Drive Borehole #4 EXPLORATION SKE`Tlti, GO'TSWALD MEADOWS No.4 ...p JaxXtiscy 7, 1989 Proposed Extension � N . '; of Murray Boulevard John E Eng nee ing • r • • ■ • ._u , rr .. ' .6.. OREGON � ' a� T'I��R� ' SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION , D 3 25 SW Ball, PO Box 23397 • . �.ITX A.R OF TIG , • ]. �. S Tigard Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 FOB. STAFF USE ONLY . CASE NO - '. OTHER CASE NO'S: . L 4 RECEIPT N0. ' r-P , AP CATO = E TED .BY N k DATE �-. . pFNERAL INFORMATION pP 13caton l eents submitted! ' '''.• Lpprox.OPERTY ADDRESS/LOCA.TION S.W. Scholls Ferr Y Road (A) APpliatan tom C l)ca 20604 South'outh o Old Scholls Ferry Roam (B) owner's signature/written' MAP AND TAX LOT ' . ;r OT N'0. 1S1 33 GA. 'lax Lots 200 and authorization (C) Title transfer instrument t C1) . SITE SIZE 15..$9 acres (U) assessor's map (1) 3RT • OWNER/DEED HOLDER* Mar er Y y Krueger .. See Be1r F) Plot plan' (pre-app czeclist,_,Y,M •DRESS Rt. 1. Box 972 PHONE (F) Applicant's statement ' • • ITS Beaverton ZIP 97007 (pre-app chec , • t) :APPLICANT* XYZ Corporation (Tdiny Bonforte) (G) List of property owners and, , 1 i:DRSS 10250 SW Greenbtir z d. , , „ A 250 feet (1) c " . Suite''.400 r PUONE 293- 60 _ addxesses within .. ITY Tigard .. ZIP 97223 �) Film g fee ( ; ) ' *When .the outer and the applicant are`diff e';cent . .. eople, the applicant must be the purchaser of record I possession with written authorization DATE DETERMINED TO BE CO �PLETE ' or "a leaaee �,n osse from the owner or an agent of the owner with written athor±zationa The owner(d) must sign this ' pplication in the space provided on page two or FINAI DECISION DEA.D7.LINE: ' subiriit a written authorization With this application • C014P PL414I20NE DESiGNATIONv ,H. PROPOSAL sUNCNARY • record. of the sub ject property , the esteri efdevelo menL review a :�_ roval to N.P,O1 Nt.imber: revue Site, .•,...:_ � �n . allow a,290 unit. rt1lti-family r_esic�ential Approval Date: development with h 523 parking spaces, " ,nal A roval Dates , Planning Also: Donald E 1:56-.110o1.< ' 10211 SW '13arbur Blvd Suite 2.0 Eeig:ineeti ig . r5"2FP�Lu - �''•��P Portl and OR 97219 •jam,)'d 4r/y( --., I t M I \ % : .. r �V I � I I i x TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSI i 1 • • • • Tlgard, • • fJJ u � I uh • KITTE-,LS,. ON & AS OCIATES INC ' L5 • March 1989 • �; ; • • • ♦ • • • • • ..IM..MH.mrN ..:♦ ,..w.' 4. u..i a..:,.:::,,.�i.,Y.rrwla�r♦w_.n. ..v....�...,.. r.,„ _ .. � .♦- r �Irw....! u Y16�q.`A!-tk'V,-iNF+.N# for the , a wo oD s WW VILLAGE Y �� ����� E � W.A is .♦ 1 � � is , i. , ' i Developer: _ I Anthony G. B anforte Post Office Box 6627 Beaverton, Oregon 97007 ' 97007 r' Prepared by • ` r Z'ittelton & Aeciates, Inc. 512 8w Broadway, Suite 220 .. 1 I , � ',Portland, Oregon 97205 (503) 228.5230 • • I March 1989 I Project No.. 236,00 I • zl .. OD g1 M MUM REQUIREMENTS A �A' IC °�✓ .�.7A.L:d�� FOR A T�L�Ii"a-L'a�iti./ REPORT: s Proposed Developments Requirement Pagets) I :« 1. Site Access Evaluation 40 2. Analysis of Traffic Characteristics a) Existing Traffic Conditions 9 1 b) Projected Total Traffic ' 26 c) Site-Generated Traffic Estimates 21 3, Analysis of Intersection Ir-i la rovement Needs 38 ru„ 4. Internal Circulation Characteristics 38 i 5. Effects on Adjacent Access Drives N/A I , 6. Effects on t Alternative r.rravel Modes 7 , 1 n 1 , , / {{ to TABLE OF CONTENTS • • c • INTRODUCTION r • • • • . e • • . II' • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •. • • •. • • • • • •. 1. 1. SCOPE OF TEE REPORT 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION c. . SUMMARY O F THE FINDINGS A2I �E C O . �N�A�I ONS • J • •. ♦ ♦.• s- Y r • e • u"•I. EXISTING TIN CONI) IONS • .t i • . • • • a • • • • • • •1• 1 • • • I. ♦ • • •' • ...• • •♦• • • it • • •.: 6 SITE CONDITIONS . • TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES • TRAFFIC CONTROL „ TRANSIT SERVICE ., 1 TRAFFIC SAFETY Q TRAFFIC VOLUMES '' PLANNED TRANSPORTATI ON IM �O�EMENTS • . . . . • . . . . • . . � . ,. � .' . 19 . TRAFFIC IMPACT A N A L Y S I S . . 4 • • . • • . . . 61, . • • . • • • ; . • • . • . • • • 20 a E, DEVELOPMENT PLANS '' SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES 'il TRIP DISTRIBUTION TRIP ASSIGNMENT I , • ANALYSIS OF OPERATIONAL IMPACTS ANALYSIS OF L]EF T-TOR,N REFUGE NEED ON NEW SCHOLLS FERR RC A7 r ' tNTERNAL SITE CIRCULATION. 1 N OE ACCESS ALTERNATIVES • �,. COMPARISON • cONC�trSIONS ANA RICOMMEN11)ATIONs e • i • • • • • • • ' • • • ♦ • • • • • • • • i i i • i i i I 3 I , , ♦ . ' .. v.�:v •.r r.. «r.I... ..,.,.� ' n - r li S nom. z LIST OF FIGURES « Figure e 1•1 Site Vicinity Map • • • e • . • • • • • •:• • • • • • • • • • • •. • • •.. • • •.• • •...• • 2 Figure 2. Site Plan . • • --• . • • •. . • •. • . . • ♦ • • • • • • •...• • •. • • •. :• • •.. • • • • • • • • : 4 Figure 3. Existing Traffic Volumes (Morning peak hour) • • • • . • • • • . . • • • 13 Figure 4. Existing Traffic Voluxnes(Evening Peak Hour) . . , . • . • 14 Figure 5, Assumed T r i p Distribution Pattern (1990 Conditions) . . . . 23 Figure 6. Assumed T r i p Distribution, Pattern (2010 Conditions) . . . . • . . . . 25 • Figure . Site-Generated Traffic (]990 A.M. Peak Hour) . . . . . 27 Figure 8. Site-Generated Traffic (1990 P.M• Peak Hour) • • • .. • • . . . . . • 28 Peak Hour Conditions) . • . . c • 29 9. Projected Total Traffic (199Q A.M.A Pe Figure 10• Projected Total Traffic (1990 P.M. Peak Hour Conditions) . . . . . 30 . Figure 1L Site-Generated Traffic (2010 A.M. Peak Hour) • . . • . • • . . . . . 33 Figure 12. site-Generated Traffic (2010 P.M. Pear Hour) , • : • • • • . • . 34 Figure 13. Projected Total Traffic (2010 A.M. Peak Hour Conditions) • • : • 35 Figure 14. Pro ected Total Traffic (2010 P•M. Peak Hour Conditions) • . . . 30 • Figure 15• Conceptual Design for Proposed Left Turn Lane . . . . • • . . 41 1 i 1 R 1 t l 1 I ?' �n I _..,.,_,.........Y--7 . • is . 1 LIST OF TABLES 1F ITable 1• Summary of Reported Accident History • . • . . . • . . . — Table 2. Service Level Definitions for Si alized Iite Service � reactions' . . . • . . . . . . i 1' Table 3. Relationship Between LOS and Delay (Signalized Intersections) • .... . . .. 12 • Table 4, Relationship Between Level of Service and Reserve Capacity . . . 16` ' L Table Service Definition (Unsi alized, Intersections) • . . • . . ♦ . •. ble 5. Level of S Definition gn 17' Table 6. LOS Summary (Existing Conditions) . . '. . . . . 414 4 ♦ . • • .• • • . . . • 18 Table 7. Assumed T r i p Generation C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s• • , . . . . . . • • . • • 24 Table 8. Level of Service Sixmmary With Site (1990 Conditions). . ♦ . . . . . . . 3 i` Summary (2010 Conditions)' . • . • . • . . . . • . 3 Table 9. Level oferv�ce " ary wath Site (2Q1 7 • E 7: v is • 4 i ° .-.•r.:. «,.«+.. »,-..»rte:.w. .r ,u.., ..cR:_ .r +a.max .,..,.,.. .u4 7/t • ry I INTRODUCTION SCOPE OF T THE P'CI� r . likely trafi related conducted to analyze and evaluate e c A tra�'ic analysis has been c aa�aly y impacts associated with the proposed Woodside Village multi.-family development in Tigard, Oregon. The proposed site is located along the south side of S.W. New Scholls Ferry Road approximately 2000 feet west of the northern signalized intersection of Road/S.W. New Scholls Ferry Road. Figure 1 shows the site , S.W. Old Scholls Ferry , vicinity map for the proposed development. Some of the specific traffic related issues discussed in this report include: ti o Existing traffic conditions in the project study area. o `rip characteristic estimates for the proposed development of the site. o Peak 'hoax operations at the site access driveway and on the adjacent streets. ng sight distance requirements, queueing o Safety considerations include. turn requirements, and various physical char acteristics such as left separation needs. P o Access spacing re q uireme nS.W.s.�'. New Sc�, holl s Ferry Road. .. h_ reel ti'famil. complex access d ivewa: and o Conceptual design of the t �' complex Y internal site circulation characteristics. ex prepared This report has `� t e p.. .P ed ar" following guidelines set forth by the Oregon 1:34eparteaent of Transportation (01,-)Orr), 4- liT.i?ODt1CtIbN ii . Y., ro , I � I • r .l 1 RTH 4 • ti • • • • • • • • • SITE I 4 r�v HiGww • 5 1 • o , I i I • I , I • • • � � I S GHo��S NE`r' f • Y MAP <1/4, I ; Y , . agog' y� DESCRIPTION PROJECT '�,9 The proposed 290 unit multi-family development will be built on the currently vacant 18.77 acre 'site. In addition to the 290 units of multi-family housing, a 4,000-5x000 � 6 gross square foot day care center is also proposed on the site. The proposed development is consistent with the current zoning regulations. Figure 2 illustrates a conceptual site plan for the multi-family development. The preliminary site plan snows two site driveways to provide access from the project to S.W. New Scholls Ferry Road. The proposed main access on S.W. New Scholls Ferry Road is located approximately one-half mile from the northern signalized intersection of S.W. Old Ferry Road. A second access.... driveway is Scholls Ferry Road/ S.W. New Scholls �'e located approximately 540 feet northwest of the main entrance. The proposed p with site work and first building development completed in 1990 wa devela men.t xs scheduled to ,be construction beginning in mid-late 1990 : �. . ot)tic 'a • I 7. L , . o .J14 tl•}Si+ • ..,..A... ' . 1 • ., . I.. = 111.., NORTH '.. L,L.,j--....,.---12,.._____flf..,....,... 1..f.--,...t. 1 i , 1• A/ 0. ..., 1111111111 41- • `rte � ' ►r "+ .��� �' Silk- ry{ mow / x p, ,,,,,, (, ,, / . /. G Ill 1 omII. �k r_ k+i i , 1 �` '"' • , 1 i4 ' L '• t r I1 I' 1� t mi — 3 F ,,i'z' t • (d 1, '' *4,11111' ' II R k 1 h 1 11 b _ it • JI . P! t e,,t. V krP.;j— m' 4 , , • { 1 ` IODSIDE Iguro VILLAGE 1 twidreh 199 n r,. v t, r • • . A , ti n " SUMMARY OF THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 'A Y X111 Based on the and ysis assumptions, metl*odelogy, and results described in. this report, it is'concluded that the Woodside Village multi-family residential development can. be accommodated while still maintaining acceptable traffic operations and safety ' characteristics on the surrounding street system. Key findings of the traffic analysis are summarized 'as follows: , o The proposed 290-n..n;ut development ment with facility) ,, day a da care fcac�hty) a.s expected , to generate 2,100 daily vehicle trip ends upon full buildout, including 210 • vehicle trip during g peak hour , • vehicle trip ends 240 veh� pen. , durt:n the evening u� the .raornuz oua and 24 c g peak hour. E. a, The existing street system has sufficient capacity to accommodate the T additional traffic likely to be generated by the proposed development. All signalized and unsignalied intersections withir the immediate site ' vicinity are expected to continue operating at acceptable service levels within the near future, even after full buildout of Woodside Village. o To facilitate vehicle turning movements into vehicle turning and out of the site and to minimize the potential for any adverse traffic operational or safety impacts, an exclusive left turn pocket should be provided on STW: New ' Scholls Ferry Road at the main site access driveway. J � , Y 7 r o By the year. 2010, daily an.d peak hour back ound traffic volu1.es on. �r S.W. New Scholls Ferx7 Road are expected to drop by approximately 3 L percent This diversion of existing traffic to S.W. Old Scholls Ferry Road , will occur when planned ithprcovemunts to that roadway are completed by T Thus, future traffic conditions at the proposed site driveways should improve relative to exist±n p g conditions: o Two access drives should be provided to the site from S.W. New Sclaolls Ferry Road. '^ of two : +:... The provision access � • °• 'traffi`ic on any One internal street a css drives reduces the volume of � potential for env�.ronmental capacity s gment, anal would mixu.m.�.�e the . . { ^ `r to be exceeded. Two � thresnolc� acces drives would also be of benefit in''the provision of emergency " services: j -5 Strkflifitir OF F1AID!MMS a ti y .A A , ... EXISTING CONDITIONS T ITIO S M. SITE� COND .. The si te of the p ro poi ed Woodside Villa ge multi-family development is located southwest of the intersection of S.W, Old Scholls Ferry Road and S.W. New Scholls Ferry Road in Tigard, Oregon. Currently, the site vacant with the exception g p of a site yon single house. The land use surrounding the site on the north, south, and west is vacant with the exception of a couple of houses scattered amongst open fields. Directly to the east of the site a recently completed residential development exists, . however, no access would be provided between the proposed Woodside Village F • i P p l-." p g development. As Figure 1 illustrates, the development and the existing residential deve , I major roads providing access to the project site include S.W. New Scholls Ferry Road . and S.W. Old Scholls Ferry Road. TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES Ferry as a Major Collector (Reference 1), and S.W. New a hells I'ex Road is classified ed a �� serves as by-pass to the south of S.W. Old Seholls Ferry Road, for traffic traveling between the southwest section of Washingto n Coen Highway.. County and � 217 on Scholls •Ferry Road. Within the study area, S. N. New Scholls Ferry Road consists of a two- lane undivided cross section. The pavement width on S.W.' New S+chollls Ferry Road Ri.th;r+ the vicinity of he site is 32 feet with two 13 foot travel lanes and 'two foot shoulders on each side of the road. z .Arterial, and serves as the as ll� o Ante S.�1V. Old Scholls ferry.. Road is classified a a � A.. southwest section of Beaverton p averton and ghway 217. , ramary route for travel the Because of its connection to ' [away Boulevard, S.W. Old Scholls Ferry Road serves as the most direct route for travel between south Bea °• nand points west and sautb,, r vertu E 7STr rd c !71ONS 'fir r This traffic analysis is limited to an evaluation of the traffic impacts associated with L the proposed development on the'major intersections within the study area. TFIC,CONTROL y Old Scholls Ferry Road The S.W. New Scholls� Ferry R�ad/S.W d intersection is controlled by a three phase signal that w as turned on in May of 1988. The southern. intersection of S. V. Old Scholls Ferry Road/S.W. New Scholls Ferry Road is an unsignalized intersection with stop control on the S. V. Old Scholls Ferry Road leg. All other intersects y area are controlled by stop signs posted on the the stud intersections within n - minor street approaches. TRANSIT SERVICE T dui entl no transit service is provided aloe S.W. New Scholl y� s p g' Ferry Road within the service to the area a vicinity of the site. Though future 'T'z°i-let plans may include at a later date, for the purposes of this analysis it was assumed that none of the site- generated person trips would be made by transit. TRAFFIC SAFETY Records of!reported accidents along S:W,, Tev Schalla Berry Road withi► the stud • y L area w ere obtained n ed f, rom the Oregon. Department of Transportation for 1985, 1986, and 1987: These accident identify any safety records .were reviewed in an attempt to deficiencies that ma. exist� may ° within'.:the study area. Table 1 displays a .summery of this review: AS shown in the .table the majority. rit of aec�dents were 'turrin accidents f � y g' at a unsignahzed intersections and private access drives. No clear accident pattern exists that problem and the total � . at would.-::suggest the presence of a significant traffic safely prol�le, occurring within the study area appears t ,.� •.• numbe�c of accidents occ g y pe o be typical of other • rural road segments throughout the states Therefore, it is concluded that there are ad,o significant traffic safety issues within the study!areas • EXISTING COLVDl Prpb1s .4 A / I 0 11 TABLET SUMMARY OF ACCIDENT 'TY'ES ALONG S.W NEW SCHOLLS FERRY ROAD FROM MILEPOST 5.34 TO 7.51 (LJANTJAEY 1, 1985 TO DECEMBER 31, 1987) X98 ce dent `I'vne ,ether 'I' ruing 6 55 n . I Fixed Object 2 18 a I3e,ad On 1 I 9 . r Non Collision 1 0 Other j_, Total ,11 100 1986 Ag.Cident ape Percent Turning 3 43 Fixed Object 2 29 . ° N Side Swipe 1 14 to Total sit 7 100 1987 e N m er Accident Type � b P�icent Turning 7 64 Fixed Object 2 18 ]Mead On 1 9 Side Swipe ° c. Total 11 100 I I i -8. MaSTIWG CO, li0 TIONS . , A M . Y • As part of the traffic safety evaluation, field studies were also conducted to determine whether adequate intersection and stopping sight distance is currently avt..;lable at the {' proposed site access drives. Based on these observations, it was found that the available intersection+ sight ht distance at each proposed driveway is currently in excess of 550 feet in both directions. Regular maintenance and/or trimming of roadside vegetation may be necessary to maintaiia this sight distance into the future but this is typically accomplished during the course of normal hi hway maintenance routines and �3'p• 3' g g practices. Base d upon po a review of accident data and results of field observations regarding intersection sight distance, it is concluded that no significant safety problems currently exist within the immediate site vicinity, Further, it is not expected that development IL. of this site will adversely affect the traffic safety characteristics of the surrounding street system.:, since the proposed site access drives will be designed to high rural standards as is described in a later section of this report. K T `FIO VOLUMES if • • Current weekday mornin g and evening g p eak hour traffic volumes at the key intersections I . wzthin the study area were determined throu g h manual counts conducted ' I by Kittelson 8 Associates, Inc. These counts were conducted during a mi.d-week day (Thursday) during March 1989. The peak hour ur observations revealed that the morning peak hour occurs from 7:15-8:15 a.m., while the evening peak hour occurs from 4.15- 5:15 p,m. The existing morning and evenin g P eak hour traffic volumes ar e shown in Figures 3 and 4, �w r 1 LOS is a concept developed to quantify the degree of comfort (including such elements as travel time, number of stops, total amount of stopped delay, and impediments .. .I caused by vehicles) afforded to drivers as the y travel an.. x nterecti or ar I roadway segment. stopped .:delay per } : .. :. Recent research has determined .that. average; � . vehicle is the best available measure of the LOS at a signalized intersection, As a acit . 'acnual (Reference 2), s defined wxth,n the. 1985 Highway �' ' • i � grades are �' Capacity used �. grades are des qualitatively for 'signe lize I to denote the various LOS; these six grades �r,.hed q�alita�ivoly � •s. . ons in Table 2i Additionally rrable 3 identifies the liiat�ea�secll,i y he relationship between level J Y• 9 I g.;178TINO oO. X'TIaN� , I , of service and average stopped delay per vehicle. Using this definition, a "D" LOS is generally considered to represent the m nainum acceptable design standard. . 1 For signalized intersections, LOS defines the quality of the traffic flow, but does not necessarily describe the overall design adequacy of the intersection to accommodate the traffic volumes being analyzed. As an example, a good LOS can be achieved even . • when the volume/capacity ratio for the intersection exceeds 1.0. Similarly, there are conditions under which a'poor LOS is"achieved even though the p is achieved � voiumeJcapadty ratio L • summary for the intersection �. is well below 1.0. Therefore, all signalized intersection su provide calculated d LOS and the calculated vrd:e both the contained na. this re rt ro _, volume/capacity ratio for each intersection. In this way, the reader is provided with a complete p description of the effected operation conditions for each signalized intersection that is analyzed. For unsignalized intersections, LOS is defined dif'f'erently than for signalized intersections in that it is based upon the concept of "Reserve � p Capacity (i.e., that portion of available hourly capacity that is not used). A qualita- tive description of` the various service levels associated with'th a.n unsigrnalized intersection' is presented in Table 3• A quantitative definition of LOS for an wr, unsign.alized intersection is presented in Table 4. s The reserve capacity concept applies only to an individual traffic movement or to shared lane movements. Once the capacity of all the individual movements has been calculated. and their LOS and expected delays determined, an overall evaluation of the intersection Normally, having the worst LOS defines the `� can be made. �Ttirmall the movement Navin t int overall evaluation, but this may be tempered by engineering judgement. Past alized'' analysis procedure indicates that this ` gn y 8 prcaced ast experience with the uns L methodology is very conservative in that it tends to overestimate the magnitude of any otential problems that might exiist. Therefore, the results of any unsi alined inter- p problems y thought in mind, Generall , LOS E is reviewed with this . .. section analysis should be re : : .: . . p although also indicates intersection, ,althou it■ considered to acceptable for an utasr •alined into that the need for sr alization should be investigated. ' All LOS g analyses described �n this report were pe rformed in accordance with, the :.. proce dures described above: Cop ies of the analy sis forms can be reviewed u o n request. In order to assure that this s anal sis n s based upon wors t ease con : r as, the -10- ENS111ATG CGN1)r"1ON9 r • i i TABLE 2 ,I LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS (SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS) CTIaN� Level of , Service _, Traffic Flow Characteristics A Very low average stopped delay, less than five seconds per vehicle. This occurs when progression is extremely favorable, and most vehicles arrive during the green phase, Most vehicles do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may also contribute to low delay. I B Average'stop delay is in the range 'of 5:1. to 15.0 seconds per vehicle. This I g p gener ally occurs with good progression and/or short cycle len(2.ths. More vehicles stop than for LOS A, causing higher levels`of average delay. C Average stopped delay is in the range of 15.1'to 25.0 seconds per vehicle. These . y higher delays may result from fair progression and/or longer cycle lengths. ♦ { I ndividual c y cle failures m a y begin to appear in this le vel: The number of vehicles stopping is significant at this level, althou g h i!riany still pass through the :without stopping. D Avera g e stopped delays are in th e range of 25.1 to 40.0 seconds pI er vehicle.. The i nflu nc e o f n esti n becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from • some combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle length, or high volume/capacity ratios. Many vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not . ., stopping declines. Individual cycle failures are noticeable, • lJ Average stopped delays are in the range of 40.1 to 50,0,seconds per vehicle. This is considered to be the limit of acceptable delay. These high delay values generally indicate poor progression, tong cycle lengths, and hi g h v olune/capacity ratios, Individual cycle failu res are frequent acaurt ericeo, F Average stop delay is in excess of 60 seconds per vehicle. This is considered to be unacceptable to most drivers. This co on often occurs with c)versaturation• It th may also occur at high voluina/ca acitdi atit9s below 1 00 with many individual high p y a vt .and long c y progr Y .ale lengths may also be major cycle failures. Poor esslon an contributing causes to such high delay levels• rwl,wilrr through more than one sirealn d occur cu�.nmgaen One or more vehicles are forced to wit Note, •A signal cycle failure is considered�'gn ' for .t particular approach. Y i Y �.1r, I EXI'ST.r1V'`G CONDITIONS 1 I q,r, i • -' „ .,,.W LEVEL-OF-SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS 4 Stopped Delty Per, fr • Level.of Service Vehicle (Sec) , , ___.., ab B 5.1 to 15.0 C 15,1 to 25.0 D 25.1 to 40<0 , E 40.0 to 50;0 d; n .. Source:- ° -Reference 2 • r .1. .._ ,, . a NORTH • X50 65 • • • • • Q r • • • a• e c y j "•,,,.,. hails . • W. 365°°.. 4—^"'iD5 • X989 BACKGROUND T'RAF C 13 WOOD SIDE VILLAGE gut.d ��h�dreh 1959 _ 3 Z36f10a w 0v i6 ^ i SnxF,..:s:r xl..�....�._.a .._ .._ate..... »,.ix...._,eW+.x.:;.♦iy.ia.axr+.:, i-..c..v e.... .,..�.r.l.. ._ ', .. .., _.. ., .� v Mu.. - FC NORTH N tin. I; • t , , L , i • �!'TC I ..., t Ne k... l.. .,� is , M/ ✓p 80 '5 G' • i i ROUND TRAFFIC 1986 AC J 1. Y�.M' � Kt' `Flgl�t�� I I _ , I 14- D IDE VILLAGE 1 March 1989 �36t I L I �r k • +51-.1:.,..-...kuw .JU . ..1.. 1,., v.... ... _ -..« a..x.i.. ...... ..a , I i ww 1 }}; n � , ,i ' weekday peak hour flow rated during the evening peak hours were used in the evaluation, of all intersection lew�3ls of:service. Thus, the analysis reflects conditions c that are only likely to occur for two hours out I? y y average weekday. For the t of each avers remainder of each weekday and throughout the weekends, traffic conditions within the study impact area are likely to be better than that described in this report. '' a I , Table 6 summarizes the results of the intersection LOS calculations for both the signalized and unsignalized S. old. Scholls f W erry Road/S. . New Scholls Ferry Road intersections. As indicates, all intersections are currently operating at this table f rvice under existing weekday morning and evening peak hour acceptable Levels of �e conditions. d L { ww i ww t. 1 . a i., � I I w1 6- ElliiI,LT.XNG CONDITIONS ` I I , I . .M++.....v. ..._.r..a w. .. . :;.. . .ax......-+.w....:. .,.. r ..es.w..c,.n i e a 1 f nfYl F ty, w 'LIABLE 4 n, 4i GENERAL LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRII ONS FOR 1.1 a TJNSIGN A LI��Ia INTERSECTIONS 1 :1 K G,, I I I I A LOS General Description L n A Nearly all drivers find freedom of operation - Very seldom is there zrµ,.,re than one vehicle in the queue B - Some drivers begin to consider the delay an inconvenience - Occasionally there is more than one vehicle in the queue C Many`times there is than one vehicle e in the queue Most drivers feel restricted, but not (objectionably so E. D Often there is more than one vehicle in the queue " Drivers feel quite restricted 1 E Represents a condition in which the demand is near or equal to :t - fi the probable maximum number of vehicles that can be accommodated by the movement , There is almost always more than one vehicle - in the queue Drivers find the delays to be approaching intolerable levels F Forced flow i Represents an intersection failure condition tut is caused by geometric and/or operational constraints external to the intersection I E I;. I , k ; 1 I • I -16- EitISTTLWG CONDITIONS I , L p r r ♦ �, • r .1..:,41.. w.«43r.l.14,..;. n4....Jip..w-+-..a4 J...s a1•w,.u......_ nil .,,1-W... • .._, TABLE • LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA for' ISIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Reserve Capacity Level of Expected Delay to (peri ) h Service Minor Street Traffic , 400 A ; Little or no delay � Y `" 300-399 B Short traffic delays 200-299 C Average traffic delays 100499 D Long traffic delays 0- 99 E Very long traffic delays ; I I -r * When demand volame exceeds the capacity of the lane, extreme delays will be encountered with queuing which may cause severe congestion affecting other traffic nxoveilnents in the intersection. This condition usually warrants 1. improvement to the intersection.IL,,,, . Source. Transportation Research i Board. "Highway Capacity Manual". Special Report 209 • (19 ) ., I , I 1 fi I'' f • 1 C , I 1 � 1 17 YXa9T1IN'C Cf,. 1),ITIoNS l i • r1 gip , , • TABLE 6 NY EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS • S finalized �jsigniz , Reserve Intersection ection Delay V\Q ; L.QS. Capacity AM PeLilt Hour w S.W Old Scholls Ferry Road/ 346 S.W. New Scholls Ferry Road (A..M. Peak Hour) • S.W. Old Scholls Ferry Road/ 9,9 .88 B .. S.W. New Scholls Ferry Road (A.M. Peak Hour) P.M. Peak Hour • 1 - . r�: �.d Scholls �`e a S� �`3' �o d/ 354 A S4W. New Scholls Berry Road 4 (P.M. Peak Hour) 1 l i / S.W. Old, Scholls Ferry Road/ 10.2 .86 Z3 y S.W. New ► c,aolls I+erry Road (P.M, Peak Hour) • -18- E STt G COWDZT.10.11 l , PLANNED TRANSPORTATION° 'RO i E Intensive residential. development of the land near Scholls Ferry Road now and in the °N /leer future has brought about a nunaber of transportation improvements in the study 1 ' ' area The recently c®. rp ete,; d reconstruction of the S. V. Old Scholls Ferry Road/S.W. f t New Sch.olls Ferry Road intersection, has helped n resol m' g capacity ty .tnd safety problems. Planned inaprovemtants in the area include the diversion of traffic from S.W. New Scholls Ferry. . ,s � Road to S.W. Old Scholls Ferry Road by realignment of S.W. Old Scholls Ferry Road to entourage through traffic on S.W. Scholls Ferry Road to use ! S.W. Old Scholls Ferry Road rather than S.W. New Scholls Ferry Road. It is also ., " � planned that 11furray Boulevard d be extended from ���. Old Scholl F e l-1-y Road past I� , S.W. New Scholls Ferry Road and` ova. into Tigard. Perhaps " the most significant transportation improvement in the area is the Western By-Pass. The Western By-Pass trans us assumed regional Manning effort � be fully can.stx°icted and much of the current r [ operational by the year 2005 between 1-5 at Thalati.n and the Sunset Highway at • about Cornelius Pass Road. For the purposes of the year 2010 analysis all of these roadway improvements are.. I, assumed to be in place. For the purposes of the 1990 analysis,, there are no ' : sgnifioar�t planned improvements that may affect the traffic circulation patterns within ' the immediate site vicinity. 4 , •, t • • I 4 ' ' 49. n. q'� C L�'!fit y��l p�•��.^�q� �y �y re_ i i M I ' I , I TRA:FFICIIMPACT ANALYSIS ... 1 1_ do • The weekday peak hour impact of trat •c generated by the proposed development was :' analyzed as follows: • : I o The placement and size of th e proposed multi-f asn il Y hauss n development sent • , •: were confrmed• I o The total number of future morning and evenin peak hour trips, both in I' g �g Fe p � and out of the proposed•. � p development I,;were'estimated for development of ,• save . ,.. the site by 1990. o Site-generated t r arc predicted for the weekday morning and evening L peak hours was assigned to the street system and added to the , - ,,, , background traffic volumes for 1990 and 2410. i. Y, o Trip distribution patterns of existing residential dev�reloprgents within the ,N study obtain•., •. dy area were examined �to obt 'n an estimate of the trip distribution ,I pattern for the proposed eve1opment. 'm • o ems. consideration was given h •,. I design for u Special t w ire to e access gn or the prapnsed P � development. In addition to the access location, on-site circulation 1,..,, , characteristics were evaluated. 4, ,,, ..-,- o Traffic deniands on each roadway facility were analyzed to identify any ca p acs Yu level of service, phy sical deficiencies under both 1990 94 �.d • 2010 conditions.. f , hodologyr and the analysis results are eorltained in the 1 ' Y , .y. detailed sc,ussion of s _x�.et I I •; remainder of this section. i I I s -•. •. I • I Y r, .1I 1 I l 1 I I • • , • I.. DEVELOPMENT PLANS Development plans are for a 290 umt' iniil,ti,family housing development arid a 4,000- 000 gross square foot day care center to be constructed by gr q y 1990._ The proposed scheme for the d 'access sc or th development includes two access drives, the xnaua.I access is , located approximately 2,200 feet southwest of the signalized intersection of S.W. Old Scholia Road/S.W. New Scholia Ferry Road intersection. The secondary access is located approximately 540 feet north of the main access on S.W. New Scholls Ferry Road. In accordance with ODOTs minimum requirements for a traffic report a second L: access alternative with only one access. on S.W. New Scholls Ferry Road was also • evaluated. SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES Because the assumed trip generation characteristics represent the basis for the entire traffic impact analysis that follows, special care has been taken to ensure the E; reasonableness of these estimates. E stu nat�s of total daily, morning evening peak k L hour driveway volumes were calculated for both the proposed multi-family housing development and the day care center on the basis of empirical observations at similar the United States. These empirical irical Observations are L developments located..thr�u bout � p summarized in a standard reference manual published by the Institute_ of ;. Transportation Engineers (ITT) (Reference 3). The trip generation characteristics shown in Table 7 were estimated for development of the property in accordance with . the proposed site plan. TRIP DISTRIBUTION The A . distribution of site generated trips onto the orating roadway system, within the study area was estimated through exainination• of the site development plans relative to the surrounding regional and local street systems The estimated trip distribution at rn shown in Figure� a is consistent mt with assumptions made ade in a recently completed traffic study the urra Y h,ll development (Reference The estimated , . . • -21- `l'R.A.27.re YMPAC ANALYSIS i , ft tI • trip distribution pattern for 2010 was developed on the basis of discussions with ,. - 01)(01T officials and examination„ predicted traffic volumes provided by 000T. The r acted voiumnes for 2010 from ODOT rely on three key assuraptions. The three �i. p e ses txons art as l follows: vas: o The Western By-Pass is in place west of the proposed Woodside Village development, 'ng Highway I The diversion o f through traffic c off New Scholia Ferry Road o nto , S.W. Old Scb.olls Ferry Road through a series of improvements to S.W. Old Scholls Ferry Road,is accomplished. • I o The 1Viurr.a y Road a d exte ri x on x � in place lxnlci n g sou t h 1e a v x-i;o n to • Tigard. The extension is to the southwest of the proposed Woodside Villa•e development. '' • ' As a result, the trip distribution past ern shown in Figure 6 was assumed to apply to all site-generated traffic under projected 2010 weekday`I conditio11s, It is believed that . . ns represents a best estimate based `upon the I both the ��so and 2010 dxstrxbutYO • available knowledge of the existing, and projected conditions. I I yrI TRIP ASSIGNMENT Using the estimated trip distribution patterns shown in 1'i.gures 5 and 6, the weekday morning and evening peak hour traffic volumes generated by the development were . site-generated Y the street systems. wltivn the study area. The a . assigned to ax• assignment of � traffic within the study area for the morning and evening peak hours are shown in : Figures 7 and 8 for 1990 and Figures 9 and 10 for 2010, • -22- T.RIF'FIC IMPACT ANALYSIS nl i r 1'JORTH [w o f � a.� rr v • • o 1 �} • ITE • New e , JC h ttFF551fpvj (5 • • Legerhd xx -- AM. Peak Hour (xx) P, • Peak Haar ' IM'AT' WOOD IDE VILLAGE Mdr.ich 1989 • • 11 .,� r , w ■ 1 PROJECTED TRIP GENERATION FOR T PROPOSED SITE r . _Generateluwpa. m Size of A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour b Land Use Ton l„y In Out Tatra Li Out Multi Family 290 (A) 1770 150 35 115 180 115 65 r Housing ,. Day Care Center 5 (B) 335 55 30 25 60 =25 35 .'d Notes: , ' A, Dwelling Units B. 1 Gross Square Feet (in thousands) .'`. C Includes both inbound and outbound trips • a , . I ; I , .24- TEA.FFIC IMPACT A NAL7'S'.lS 1 NSN .o.�..Y. Y..ae.P i w NDRTH {{ • • • • • I • A _ • i } 'aa _ I lT 1. • . • 1 � as S . w I T1MAT D TRIP DISTRIBUTIO 1 PATTERN (1994) I 'o I h 1_ S 9 �Y.....w.�Y.Y.;. z sWWo 6 P • ANALYSIS OF OPERATIONAL INIPACTS .p a .., ... 1990 Conditions, r ° The site-generated traffic shown in Figures 7 and 8 were combined with the observed ex sting weekday morning and evening peak hour background traffic volumes shown earlier in Figures 3 and 4 to arrive at an estimated total weekday morning and evening peak hour traffic volume conditions as shown in Figures 11 and 12. Figures �. 41 - 11; and 12 represent the projected combination of background and site-generated traffic under weekday evening peak hour conditions upon completion of the proposed development Table 8 summarizes the morning and evening peak hour LOS caleulatYOr, results f®r all key intersections' tersections within the study area under completion of the development by ° indicates, all intersections within� ' the study area were found to 1990. As this table acceptable operate at ble service levels. ;. . operate � p dhrin both the nnarrnn, and evezun during morning g peak hours. r A special gap study was conducted at the site of the proposed v ' P �P Y p rn,ana access drive on S.VV" New Scholls Ferry Road to determine the availability and distribution of acceptable time gaps i n the traffic stream on S.W. New Scholls Ferry Road daring both morning and evening peak hour conditions" Since the proposed access drive does ) not yet exist, it was not possible to observe a critical time gap (within the context of this report, the critical time gap is defined to be the time gap, expressed in seconds, u .. which is found to be acceptable by 50 percent of the drivers on the minor street approach and movement). Experience has shown the cri+t 1 for minor street left turtling vehicles to be fairly consistent and at about 6,0 this basis, the field study determined that there are currently about 610 6-second � S available to minor street left turning proposed gaps g vehicles at the>, P Posed mai.n .access drive on S.W. New Scholls Perry Road during weekday morning peak hour conditions. During the evening peak hour 625 6-second gaps were observed to be available to *, minor street left turning vehicles at the proposed main access drive on S,W. New Scholls Ferry Road" Evert if it is assumed that only 85 percent of these gaps will 26- F/a IR PAcT AgAz,ySIs 1 i y/y d 1 • •, '. NORTH 3 �• ..a q • �� F ' f l r ' ITS` . � YI , P eW 21p 0 Or*Vyi • o o a r 1990 ITE-G N RAT D `TRAFFIC 1 ,M. PEAK HOUR... M drd 1989 ` 236F1a7 NDRrN I , • ■ M �J 1 i , • Q 1e... I I I , � 1! 0d S ° �" SIT ` J ♦1 M 1 t.{f ♦ ' 1'1♦. F.' 1 1'• Y 1.1♦YY •'1` I is 1, 1 .11 • � X11 ♦:d . •♦ 11 . ♦•1♦14 i1..A•{••• � , :1� 210 Y ♦t` W Y , 1• i O fJ �4�d SI ILO ~ 5 S` I I I '1990 E GENERATED TRA 'Fl i ' PEAK HOUR F'I urn , i`, f,IL 2 8.� ' OOD ID VILLAGE j ' , 1'989 _, r 1 A • • ' ' , • , • • • , , . • • • • . . . , , , , • • , • • , , • • • I® , , .. .„ , ,s • , , ., . . • . • • • • • • a 1 r•I ,. .. , • • • .• . .. ., • • • • • • • . • , • ,. i , ,, , j . I, • • • .. • • • ,,. . • ••• • • �d Sc ,..0 „ ,. ,, , , , s n r. •, • •• , • ••• . . , • , . • • , , Ails• New, • ' • 1.... �•�� • t i coi 1aq }) 1990 TOTAL TRAFFIC WITH SIT5 A M PEAK HOUR r • glj�'9 I • "IP” `t OD ID VILLAGE • hob� _1989 I , , , , , , .,, , ,, , ,, I. , . • 1 •. . , . . . . I.,.. .. • ,. .. ,• r . d kr • Sli • } • • • • v.j 4 , • 1$0°-°°d 29tl I $ 1990 TOTAL ` A E 1 WITH rrE I , 30• .r4iw Ffi jury r Mdrch 1989 • 2�5F�1� P • o TABLE 8 r LEVEL OF SiRVICE RESULTS WITH SITE DEVELOP111ENT 1990 e ' Signalized 1 Tat aiized 1 �i Reserve I dM Peak lEoBlt• � n S.W. Old Scholls Ferry Road/ - - 346 S.W. New Scholls Ferry Road [1, (A.M. Peak Hour) S.W. Old Scholls Ferry Road/ 9.9 S.W. New Scholls Ferry Road 7 (A.M. Peak Hour) • i S.W. New.Scholls Ferry Read/-, - 461 : A South Main) Access I 5��. New Scholls Ferry load/- - 415 A. North (Secondary) Access a P.,14L,a Peak Hour S.W. Old Scholls Ferry Road/ 354 A , S.W. New Scholls Ferry Road .. I (P.M. Peak Hour) S•W• Old Scholls Ferry Road/ 10.2 ,86 B S.W. New Scholls Ferry Eoad (P.M. Peak Hour) SeNV. New Scholls 1+'er y Road/- - - 416 A South (Main) Access , SAT. New Scholls Ferry Road) d 878 P North (Secondary) Access • —3 1— 7111AFFIC IMPACT ,ALYSI■ -1' N• , I j r .,. ... r. .. .,a.. actually be available to minor street left turning vehicles (some` of the gaps will probably pass through the intersection when there is no waiting minor street left- turning vehicle), there are still over 500 available gaps during both time periods, well L in excess of the outbound left turning demand at the access du ring both the morning k' and evening peak hours. For the left turning inbound traffic over 900 6-second gaps ". were found to be available during the mornir2 peak h ; g g' pe hour, while during the evenrn,g - peak hour more than 750 6-second gaps were found to eld.st. 1`', w earch has shown that • for a left turn across one lane of traffic on a two lane highway, a 5 to 6 second gap is lA •: .y acceptable (Reference 5). Once again the available gaps are well in excess of the inbound left turn demand during both the morning (50 vehicles3) and evening (100 1"'' , vehicles) peak hours. Thus, it is concluded that more than adequate capacity will be available to acco ninodate left turn egress and ingress the proposed main access drive. 2010 Conditionrs • Tt IL The site-generated traffic shown in Figures 9 and 10 was combined with the observed weekday morning aid even.`1ng peak hour background traffic volumes at the Murray extension to arrive at the estimated I. • •� ,' , Boulevard a morning and evening d total weekday �® , L peak hour traffic volt,ine conditioi,s shown in Figures 18 and 14. # , , Table 9 summa.a.zes the mornixig and evening peak hour LOS calculation results for all key intersections within the study area upon completion of the development. As this table indicates, all intersection..s within the study area were found to operate at acceptable service levels during bot h the morning and evening peak k hoLirs. Due try the , 7 significant transportation changes projected for the regional.,; � area, the distribution of I expected to change by 2010 (when full • �� traffic to and fi�brn the site is g' y bldout of the a site is expected), However, these do not significantly affect the oPexational I ; characteristics of the iiitersectxons;r Because of the diversion of traffic from. S.W. New Scholls Ferry Road to S.W. Old Seholls: Ferry Road, the Peak hour, operational characteristics at the site driveways actually improve beyond 1.9901 Overall, all , intersections within the stud • y at acceptable levels gin. 2010. area remain 7RA.FF.tc IMPACT ANA.L1.'srs a , . 1, NC]RTH ,„r' ' ti. 0 i . � O •v •, raocn U 5 ► �..»25 0 5 o- . CI. Q ( r'+'1. ' [ 21p , 1 A� � �! ‘1''�' 1 ii I 4'..'" ,,,o,,1111.,iir,,,,,e, ASS • d' TI:1AFFIC A M PEAK HOUR 1. -33"- Wo0Dsib VILLAGE 1, , a +, - B • . 4 ,4 l • �-r.+-.+,:,,...�n s ......,, �.. .n- ..tr:.a...u. n..-J..1..... ._�M.: t n.v.....u. _ ,... .», n ..♦. � .._ .. _ .,.. , " • • NORTH k Q • S • • ,. , S c\I° '' ' 0 '\' ,.......'4,44......,4,4,444.4. , , ,,, . ,,, ,, ryry • -7 CC i� c�o cn SITS '.'' • d• ew 5r,.ha��5_ •�� . . i 210 { .... I µ I ' m I I t l rOO `JcSf I • • . -' ' ' ' , '''' ' - ' ' ' ' ' 2010 SITE-G . RA ED PIAFFG , , , . , , ' ' P M PEAK HO R ,. , �igr� -34- WOODS DE V LLAGE 1 • • • • a � , • • r , Q • � Cry q,6. ••<, • Wl • 'I AAA.: A �JAA s • • . (47 ' ti + ti i a ` , • 2 oJECT8D TOTAL TRAFFIC•• A M� PEAK HOUR WOOD IDE VILLAGE' • • • • �4air�h 199 �' . . • • rr,u 4 w ' NORTH 1 • 0 s,. 100 X35 �;` 1301-`1.0*' A--128 0 85 ' t , o00 1: • NON `�• P� 'O k ATE • � �. pad.,: ,,,a;w�,'.t1.`y�••� ,�' { � C . •. � I • polls e {, 2fb ' f • i :, -' 'Iri#,,‘ 1 , , (1,.4.) . r ' ' I . . ' 2010 PROJECTED TOTAL TRAFFIC i . 1 P1Ma PEAK HOUR { FIUre !: —3 WOOD ItDE VILLAGE • Mdich 1959 • • •• r • • • • t . i . n, TABS , 1 I LEVEL OF SERVICE WITH DEVELOPMENT VEL �P SE W T 2 O1Q a ,Signalized Iintiigrializesl_ Reserve Intersection I = LOS fIttuattiU r1, ., AM Peak Hour ". 1 • I S.W. Old Scholls Ferry Road/ 346 A S.W. New Scholls Ferry Road , .i. „ rt (A.M. Peak Rohr) S.W. Old Scholls Ferry Road/ 9.9 .88 B 1' Scholls Ferry Road 1: (A.M. Peak Hour) S.W. New Scholls Ferry Road/- 604 A , South (Main) Access S W New Scholls Fe rry Road/- - 616 A , North (Secondary) Entrance • P.M. Peak Hour r S.W.j Old Scholls Ferry Road/ - - 354 A S,W. New Scholls Ferry Road I (P.M. Peak Hour) S.W. Old Scholls Ferry Road/ 10,2 ,66 13 1 SeW New Scholls Ferry Road (P.M. Peak Hour) Ferry S,W.,New- Scholls Ferry Roadl - 514 A , ' South (Main) Access 1 i S.W. New Scholls Ferry Road/- - - 648 13 a _NG�th (Secondary) Entrance -37-; I I (f i � I . 4 1 ANALYSIS OF L,EF r TU T REFUGE NEED ON NEW SCROLLS FEIREY ROAD site-generated traffic will access the site�.. g � e s Ana S.W. New Scholls Ferry Road. Mast vehicles will travel to the site from the northeast and must 'theresfore make a left � turn into the site. An analysis l was conducted to determine whether left-turn refuge ~ rotection will be warranted one or both of the proposed site access drives. This �I anted at analysis found a need for left-turn protection`at the only. I proposed main. access drive onl During both the morning and evening peak hour, a single uh.protected left tur wing location., could cause significant delays and backups to following through vehicle at this . L vehicles. The basis for this analysis is the volume warrants for left turn refuges on two-lnes treets at unsi gn alized rxtersectro ns contained in Highway Research Record No. 21.E (Reference 5). It is therefore concluded `that a left turn refuge should be provided at the proposed main access drive on S.W. New Scholls Ferry Road. 9 The provision of a left-turn refuge lane in the vicinity of the proposed main access driveway would likel result in substantial operational ational and safety benefits to'both site L background The storage length provided at the intersection generated and back vub.d txaf�.c. �h should.be 100 Feet according to 000T standards (Reference 6)• The proposed improvements would result in a 50-foot paved cross section consisting of two 12 foot travel lanes, a 14 foot center median, and two six foot paved shoulders. This cross-section could be provided within the existing 50-foot right-of-way and is shown conceptually in Figure 15. INTERNAL SITE CIRCULAflON With regard to internal site circulation; the most important design features from a> 4 traffic )peratliorls perspective are the site, access driveways and tiller relation to the ' y Specifically, ingress` and egress at the site internal road s. stein. the ° � driveways should not interfere with parkii ghmp g maneuvers s, � I . access g the plan, an unobatx.ucted ac throat of apProximately� faq � . or•dxn to { e current site p feet Sche twill be provided at both access locations on S.W.SW: ?�'ew lls Ferry Road. Based on the volume of site-generated traffic expected at both of the access drives, the depth i TRAITTC IMPACT A141ALYs18 I.. I I . t . I I' . :, • I , 4 . NORTH NTS • • • ,, 10 Degree,.. , Reversing Curve .• . . 1 I Li-. 6" Bike Lane , • cn . ( cv eN 30° Radius SS1E ACCESS , 3t! 'Radius Stir, : I ..w I 1 }} v'I a.. ,((y'1 11���'- N C .■■r■ )B pA� .......LEFT .,..,y■■■. ..., 1 PROPOSED LEFT, N F LANE . 1 } ice• ' V�Q ►b0 VILLA ` March 19..,89 _.. 236FO1`� of the access throat is adequate to minimize conflicts with parking/unparkg ... .�.4 f COMPARISON OF ACCESS .LTEE„I'•NA;11IVES 1 Consideration was also given <� ,.•oviding only r, p my one site onto S.W. New Scholia Ferry Road as a part of this study. However, the provision of two access drives on S.W. 4, Scholls Ferry Road was found to ;e far superior to one for two key reasons: o One access location provides only a single entry and exit poiiit for emergency vehicles. If this entrance were to be blocked, emergency vehicles could have a difficult time serving the middle or 'rear portion of - the development. Two access locations allow emergency vehicles access 1 at multiple points, thereby minimizing the potential for occasional ' blockage. • would cause every site-. n development w the e tixe ry . . o generated vehicle to travel past the front dwelling units. With over L. g a p g � �: 2,100 daily trips generated by the development, a single access drive would likely exceed the environmental capacity threshold of the interior neighborhood residential street system. For these reasons, it is concluded that the provision of two site drives is the most design for the planned development. desirable access ' . I ! f , i l -40- !iwitpTre,itAIPA��ANALYSIS • • ✓S I I I , CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOIAMENDATIONS Based on the analysis assumptions, methodology, and resulf,s described in this report, is concluded that the Village multi-farm • Woodside rig multi-family residential development 'can be accommodated while still maintaining acceptable traffic l operations and safety characteristics on the surrounding street system. Key findings of the traffic analysis • are su mar ed as follows: r I r o The proposed 290-unit development (with a day care facility) is expected to generate 2,100 daily vehicle trip ends upon full buildout, including 210 vehicle trip ends;during the niornin.g peak hour and 240 vehicle trip ends during the evening peak hour. • a The existing street system has sufcient capacity to accommodate the . , tional traffic likely to be generated eveloprnent. X3.11 proposed signalized and un.si alized intersections .. the d immediate 1 y ated by the ro s �` gn s withrn the x�nmedl.ate site vicinity are Il expected to continue operating at acceptable service levels wit„ri the near future, even after fall buildc■ut of Woodside Village. o To facilitate vehicle turning movements into and out of'the site and to minimize the tential for any adverse traffic operational or safety im p acts, an excl usive left turn p ocket should I be provided on S.V . New Sch Road Ferry,� ad at' the main site access driveway, . o By the year 2010, daily and peak hour background traffic volumes on n pe d to drop by approxianately 35 8►�V". New Scholls Ferry Road'are ex cte percent. " " `�'h�.s &version of existing traffic to S.W. Old Scholls Ferry Jtoad g. will occur when planned improvements to that roadway are complete d by ODOT. Thus, future conditions at the proposed site dri�re�ways e tra6�.c _cond should improve relative to existing conditions" o Two access drives should be provided to the site from S.W. New Scholls Ferry p • • two access drives would reduce the volume �'e Road, The rovxsioxt of wo acres of traffic on any one internal street segment, and would aniniraize the ° potential for environmental capacity thresholds to be exceeded, Ti o access drives would also be of benefit in the provision of emergency "I services • -41- CONCLUSIONS AND Egcc),MMJJ DAD1ONS I M I 3 • CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the • analysis assumptions, methodology,� � and rer sults described this report, , it is concluded that the �oaasxde Village ou ltx famxl y residential development can be . V acceptable , accommodated while still maintaining k . g traffi'ic operations and safety , • surrounding street system. traffic analysis .�. characteristics an. the. sur Key g the . g ysteano ]Kc iaindin s of are summarized as follows: o The r p oposed 290-unit development (with a day care facility) is expected spected to generate 2,100 daily vehicle trip ends upon full boildout, including 210 vehicle trip ends durx� the morning peak hour and 240 vehicle trip ends • during the evening peak hour. <. o The existing street system stem , g y zn has sufficient capacity y to accommodate the •., additional traffic likely to be generated by'the proposed development All signalized and unsx gn alxzed intersections within the immediate site vicinuity are expected to continue operating at acceptable service` levels within the near future, even after full buxldout of Woodside V illage. o turning movements into arid '' To facilitate out of the site and to ize the potential for mnum l or an adverse traffic operational or safety � y p exclusive left turn be provided on S.W. New • � impacts, 'an excl rn pocket should 0l1 Sch s'ferry Road at the main site access driveway. o B ~ th the year 2 1 daily and peak hour backg�o�and traffic volumes on �' By y 9 0, . i r`ry P y approximately 35 r New acholls F'e R,oad are ex acted h a b a percent. This diversion of existing traffic to S.W. Old ho s Ferry Road will occur when planned improvements to that roadway are completed by ODOT. Thus, future traffic conditions at the proposed site driveways should improve relative to existing conditions, o access the site from S.W. New Scholls Two ss ves should be provided � . p ed to th, .: ._ Ferry Road. The provision of two access drives would reduce the volume of traffic on any one internal street segment; and would 1n1Ib mi a the al capacity thresholds to be exceeded Two potential for environ.�.en� po t access drives would also be of ben pro-vision in the of emergency services: w 6'" ColtlCid sio/V,' AND RECOM �1, L AT!O1V IS I, • I f - Y REFERENCES 1., Washington County Transportation Plan: Functional Class ration System (October 1988). ' i 2. Transportation &search Board. Highway Capacity Manual. SPecial Report Number 209 (1986). 3. Institute of Transportation Bn ' , �� I� F,exs. Trip Generation ll�anuc�l. Third Edition (1983). 4. li:11.,telsc)ii & Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Report for Murrayhill Phase II .Deuuelopment (April 1987). • ,,,,N 5. Highway Research Board, Highway Research Record Number 21.1. (1967). 6 CA e r r on Department �, of Iran.sportation.. Oregon Department of Transportation Highway Design Manual. (1988). . I r I i r -42,, REFERELVCErS f � • I r � , • • • • • • I • + I . i r r • • • • • • • ��P 1 s 4 [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] I Li 7VNIO'xb10, s r{ SI J1N WfiD JCI SIHJ ,II [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing]