The URL can be used to link to this page

SDR88-12 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. ,ry-+,.• ,N- .,i. J6 r�, "�w/per _ AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING oN; 't STATE OF T County of Washington sso �' g City of Tigard ) 6. I I' ...a �;'"( � � � � first being duly sworn„ on oath 1 depose and say: (Fl- -se Print That I am a '..,• 0-t"-.. :- for the City of Tigard, Oregon. _ That I served notice of the Tigard City Gounci.1 ,o4 (t_.:Q of which the attached is a copy (Marked Exhibit A) upon each of the following named persons on the ? day of err , 19 , by mailing • 0 ,. to of c I each h them at the addr .ss shown on the attached list (Marked Exhibit •B�, said notice is hereto attached, and deposited in the United State;mail on the . . 7).��..� day of , 4. /./ 19,$7,7,, postage prepaid . . I Pr epared Notice Mailed'WW Lice/Deli er • To Post Office Subs ribed and sworn to before me thi " day of ., l9 a „c ,. 1 7,wN•rr1 P ,,,I' .! . • p war :► P pl3' 11Y g by n . v Nin'�.a ry e r 2".1"t er d K', I '1 �v S o 4.4 s ar Notary' Public Of Oregon a ' 4" My Commission Expires /_ —9/ „w +� .4° I IV q I i y • . e C' I'.-X v ... ._.._r e..._.,,w. .s,.,...,..,•„_..'_..,,...'„ :._,w,..:....,..._.,,._. i.,,..,i_M.;. .1..^..,.. ._..,i.\tip, .,,,..,.,—...+ ..,,_..«........,.._. ...._..,.,.._..,»....,.l .....«i,. . ,....._,_.,a_...e......I ., i _._,....,,.._..,a......—... ,J kii/it4 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION - BY CITY COUNCIL (Sec. 18.32,380) 1. Concerning Case Number(s): SL 88-02 and SDP 88-3.2 . 2. Name of Owner: Puget Corporation of Ore can 3. Name of Applicant: Pu et' C or oration of are on Address 7440 SW Bonita Road Tigard aR 97223 • �ss �City State Zip JD- 4 Location of Property: Address 7440 SW Bonita Road ' . • 2S1 12Ad lots 600, 700, _and 800 .. . .. � � � Legal Description � 5. Nature of Application Appeal of Hearings Officer approval to expand an existing industrial building by`ACS qud re feet and to locate a portion of a' rlcinq drivewa rarea within the 100 year flood plain. Zori ni g I P, . _ Industrial Park. 6.. Action: Appeal Public Hearing was held before City Council on September 12, . 1988. On September 26, 1988, City Council adopted Resolution No 88-98 ' wherein SER 8812 and SL 88-02 were approved with conditions.• (A copy of * . Resolution. No 88-98 is attached.) .. 7. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to xx The applicant & owners xX Owners of record within the required distance •" xx The affected a Neighborhood Planning Organization ,., I• x< Affected o er�ental �mc" . , 8. Final. Decisibi o . • „. THE DECISION WAS SIGNED ON 9/26/88 AND BECOMES E `FECTIVE ON' 9/26/8a `the adopted findings of fact, decision, and s .atement of condition can bo .' obtained from the Planning Department, `Tigard, City Hall, 13125 SW Hall -� BlV d . , P.G: Bob 23:3g'1; Tigard, 4regon '97223, � �th tf Ore his �dec fa ttte moa d, o A rding th eir A re'vie sion y e obtained b; filing a notice o nt' . gori Land tlse D f Appeals (LtFBA) deco g tc� h �' ', .1 r cedures. r y �3 Quest ns If ou have an. uestions �� X lease cal. the. xx. Ord Cit' 9 s . ,I. p g �„ ,ecorder at 639-4111..' (0257P) \�`'` ` | ,� �� / �� ,� � � ``� ( `�� ' ' , ' ` , ^ ' `� ' '� � • � � ` ' / ' � �� ` / . � ' ` `� . �� ` ! • .. ' �� ` / ' '� ' � `.. �� ' i `, �. ' �`` ��^' . ^ � . ' /~� ' w " C ` ` . L � ` ' ' . " �� ` ' CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON • � ��7 .r'�' RESOLUTION NO, 88_�2 . ` ` ` ' � . .� �� ` ' .� � `� . . '. IN THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION OF A FINAL ORDER, UPON CITY COUNCIL REVIEW OF AN ' '` APPEAL OP A HEARINGS OFFICER APPROVAL 0F A SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (&DR 88-12) '|� , . . ' /� AND SENSITIVE LANDS (SL 88-02) REQUESTED BY PUGET CORP. : . � �� ' �_-_ � _ ____-__-_- . ____ ' . ' :.'2.. , WHEREAS, this matter comes before the City Council at its meeting of September '. 12, 1988, upon the filing of an appeal by John 8kourten of a Hearings Officer �� ' '`.`. !� approval of a Site Development Review and Sensitive Lands application subject ' �` . �! *z.. to conditions. and �.. .' % " `' '� WHEREAS, the Council had before it the: 1) vicinity mop; 2) Hearings Officer � '.' decision; Randy 1 ' �`' ' � inion� 3) copies of the appeal from John 8knurteo� 4) y� Woo ley memo • ` addrenaing street improvement issues; and, 5) hearings transcripts. ' ' ` y''~'�' 'K�W� THEREFORE, based on the record in this case, the Tigard City Council ( ' � . '' upholds the Hearings Officer decision and conditions of approval with ` ' • ^ . modifications to the findings and conditions as written below: . � ]l ,` ' ` " � . The applicant participated in an LID for for the improvement of 74th Avenue in / • . . �� 198�. At that time,, no development by the landowners was planned mnd� the City � � ` ' - • �-� , ' limited the construction costs imposed on the landowners to ��,0O�. That ' : '. ! ' \�) limitation required m revision to the street '` -r6 to an "interim" standard . ! . tobudget. keep the costs within the In t�� City approved an expansion . � , to this facility lity mn� made no change in the "interim" standard for the street. � ' �. � ' � ` �� , However, the applicant is now before the City- to nearly double the size of its IA��` T'� '�`�� operation. The City consistently requires applicants to bring roads and � ^� ''� utilities to standard in conjunction with new development. There in no � `'��' dispute that the road as presently built in not to standard for an industrial � ' ' .`' ` area, ' .. . .' ^ . - NOW, THEREFORE, IT 18 HEREBY ORDERED THAI. SDR 80-12 and 8L 88-02 be and hereby � �' ) .'.'• , are approved, subject to the following conditions: � . ' `}' ^ � `` 1. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE or BUILDING PERMITS,. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL~ ' . � . BE SATISFIED, H ' [ '' [' - t ` a, standard half-street improvements, including concrete sidewalk,. driveway apron, curb, asphaltic concrete pavement" sanitary sewer, ^ storm drainage, streetlights and underground utilities (as .:5 . practical), mlial1 be installed along the 741,h Avenue frontage. Improvements shall conform to the alignment of existing adjacent , im ve0entn, The p�vem�nt thnMeoy aml cmnnoo # mn o • / ' � asphaltic concrete pavement on 2 inches of (8/4«-0 and 8 inches of [. � .`' (2"-0) aggregate bmnerock^ The proper owner shall execute a waiver . of remonstrance on forms provided by the city, waiving the right to |, ' ''''; object�ot hm the formation of a future local i district for �� ` • ^ � ~ ' ~ ~~ improvement - , (` the purpose of constructing an asphalt pavement overlay on 8W 74th , •� � � .� / �^ � � � . / ' � ` • '�� R�8OLUTI00 NO' 8 Page 1 ---~- `� '`` � �� ' ^ ` ' ` � ^ � ` '. /`�` (^ ` / '• � � ' ~ , y- -' ' /' ' ^ ��'�`��' ' r` \ , ), . , ` ' c' ` .. � � . ' _, ` _ 4 ` . '^ . . , . nti0 Avenue. It is ( ,.ler•stood that they pavement ovc Ay will be deferred W until such time as a substantial portion of SW 74th avenues has been improved and paved between Bonita Road and Durham Road and additional pavement thickness is needed to support expected traffic loadings. Said condition shall not in itself establish :precedent as to future improvements of S.W. 74th Avenue. 1 b; Additional, right—of—way shall be dedicated to the Public, lalong the l 74th Avenue frontage to increase the right—of—way to 25 feet form the " The description r centerline, 1"h shall be tied to the existing right-of—way centerline, The dedication document shall be on City • forms and approved by they Engineering 'Section, dedication forms and ir.!structior►s are available from the Engineering Section. C. The northern driveway shall be relocated or deleted to comply with they 30 foot spacing requirement between driveway aprons, d A permit or evidence demonstrating compliance shall be obtained by • the applicant from the 0,J. Army Corps of Engineers (Authority: Section 404, Clean Water act, 33 U.s,C, 1344) for discharge or dredge or fill material into waters of the United States A copy of the .I , permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Office by the applicant. e. The applicant shall provide for roof and parking lot rain drainage) to the public storrriwater drainage system), •" . fI Five (5) sets of plan and profile public improvement construction plans and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by l a Registered Professional Civil Engineer, derailing all proposed .public' improvements shall be submitted to the Engineering Section for approval. Two (2) sets of plan and profile plans shall be submitted for preliminary review prior to submittal of final plakts, g. Construction of proposed publi c improvements shall not commence; until after the Engineering section has approVed public improvement plans, The sectictin will required 100 percent performance assurance or letter of commitment, with payment of a permit fee and a sign installation/streetlight fee, Also, the execution of a street • opening permit or construction compliance agreement shall ,occur prior •'�, to or concurrently With the issuance of approved public improvement T.,A plans. h. A revised site paid landscaping plan shall be submitted for Planning Director approval which includes they following items: 1, The parallel parking spaces near 74th Avenue shall have mi ii r dimensions of 8.5 feet by 20 feet, 2, The northern driveway in the now parking area shall be omitted, 3 . Specific: species and si4e of landscaping materials shall be identified. 4, Specific plans illustrating how the two trees located in the .,. southern rn parking lot wi,ll be saved as indicated, i Et301. 11"1.ON A10. 88- ' Page I I s I . I e I I I eta x«;« 6 •‘k.44, q ,, , I { p • •A u r .ry-.-..wr.J..........a.r..r•.....f...:.nx o....r......�...._......._. e.... - •.a.....w. ...,r._.....e.., _._ . ...u...:..r,w•:J..i...._x...n.r....-'..n...r.....c.,..r.t......w..+i..ww.r-..4-.i..-..,. .�.....i.-_;.r.r._.... .''.•.. y 5, Two h andic )ed parking spates within eai access to building ' entrances. ..... i The 100 year flraodpiain shall be dedicated to the public from Bonita Road to the south property boundary. The dedication documents shall ,. be on forms approved by the City and shall be recorded with . Washington County, 2,'' All items noted in condition 1(h) above shall be installed prior to I occupancy of the new 20,000 square foot addition. s,; This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final decision date. 4. The air conditioning unit and any other 'outdoor mechanical equipment shall comply with applicable DEQ noise standar'rls. ,' 1 x ay S r is G`I Th f;?- �C. ,C.,t01". erlb .. .. ----:"..4-&lit I/a . ---..----- . .. • A,rl T ST:' Mayor.— City of Tigard I . Deputy C,L.f.AL“___A-1,61,r,Recorder - City ofwTigard r� r .r APPROVED �w �T°0 FORM: ' ..41.-)1.12...,,,, 1: . -.) .. City Recorder h.u/7065D • ' a µ rw I I { I • „ • RESOLUTION NO{ 88-6f, • t.•. gage 8 r •i r. i •� i� ',.e � Cf '�� J � '0 t, � ' � h_ ' ' v r�`, A } � 1l) t' ` • 4 a • . • » , 'w� 1, . � , 1 6 p ∎ r ` , • �df•' • ti r " .r• fa ''./'ter ft q •� :',1, f t` 'na�:• Puget Corp. of OR.' • 7440 SW Bonita Rd.' � ',=', ,,, Tigard, Or 97224 `'''v Lr, , i ('''''`''Al�^r'� v N�'T' .F K William A. Monahan I 1 " n 12290 W Main S-4A � a • r Tigard, OR 97223 ' .r„�• � !+.1 LIB µ '� ,',i4, SKaur e�� ; •,. SW Wei. ''''-' , 1. Road I J ri�,�,�,li 1.i Beaverton, OR 97007 . -,, j; • lG, w.,// y �t� 1 � 7Cy Neil Austin ' 1a,; ,,w .;,.• , ,, �� l eroer Trust ' a • • '.1„.,:,-;{. ti k, n� � r , l � 1 l nI r . • • { f .1 •.,,. '' • n youµM ' • • f., f� • •1 • _ I4 i�t 4 rp r 1• 11 • • . • ''. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) ' County of Washington ) ss v , Cittry of Tigard. ) c' :, . I, `•...., ,,J'. : if' de ,,,,5 -being first~ duly sworn, on oath depose and say: Please Print That I as a le0 % 41.'' -:T for . �; i f�" The City of 5:` ,ard,, Oregon. . — That I served NOTICE OF Pi7BLIC HEARING for: 1 Nerved NOTICE OF DECISION for: • .....__Ife-Tc City of Tigard Planning Director T,4; ax�d� arming .isaion :`,'• . ; =T ga Hearings Officer icer Tigard.City Council r• . .. • L copy ( bllie Hearing 'otice/I'ot ice of Decision) .f match is,at ad r ' Exhibit "k") we nailed .to each armed pees at the rens shown on. the �.,u' attached'list mucked exhibit 'Ea •on t1 1 of CA, . £98 e • . s Lice NOTICE , ,.. hereto sad. 1 . d �► ' YC�C4��. as - :�� s � posed y d •• , • "appropriate bulletin board on the r,.._ d,.» of a 19'n and deposited in. the United States Mail on, the . , ,, day of ( °C . la . 193„ stge tprepaid s i ' P j r• .�a' + « :fb. t, / n, , f, * : .......2:7li r . , . a me . . • � , . Signature �.'ersoi n delivered to PO OF ICE ?e son o po'. on Bulletin. Boa. ,,,, • . • rd (For �e�isiomC ° ,r. t,4b 6 p& ' and,e3 worn to before sue on the day of ._.1,,, ..,,QA , ,93 r r w `r nl `- u tE �ryw x* 11 9 r F c„ ,,°e, ,v f;+ y , li( 6t' n 9 p Cotetassion Expires: - c .;, ;,. 025 P/oc 2i ' • • xµy r fy .. ........_,...1..... .. ....... ...............-.«.r.. L v.r.... r..w.-a.. _.« r.... _ ... .s,.♦a„_..—:•e” _ y..A» ,I t_ .,• ,•., , .. CITY 0 ITS �' T I • a TIGARD r . Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER - BY HEARINGS OFFICER 1. Concerning Case Number(s) : SL 88--02 I& SDR 88-12 2. Name of Owner; Puget Corporation of Oregon I 3. Name of Applicant: Puget Corpora•ti:on ofOregon •• . Address 7440 SW Bonita Rd. C itYm, ml_..�:.._.StateQB_Zip 97 223 • � � � , 4. Location of Property: • Address 7440 SW Bonita Road Legal Description 2S1 12AC lots 600, 700, and 800. 5. Nature of Application: To expand an existing industrial bui lding1_by 20,000 square 'feet and to lacate a plorts:on of a pa king driveway area within the • 100 wear flood 1ain.,. Pro ert Zoned I-P Industrial Parks ,- 6. Action: _ Approval as requested X Approval with conditions Denial 7. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall • and mailed to ? xx The applicant & owners xx. Owners of record within the required distance ' xx The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization xx Affected governmental ageneles 8. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON .2.1t..9_1 29, 1988 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. l.r The adopted findings of fact, deciston, and statement of condition can be o : . obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall r' Blvd. ) P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. 9. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with 18.32.290(b) and Section 18.32.370 which provides that a written appeal may be filed within 10 days after r notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3'3O P.M. auly 29, 1988` 10. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, 639 4.171. r• .. 0257P/0021P ,fit f to f k • BEFORE THE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR ) : :. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND SENSITIVE) NO. 88-'12 AND `: LANDS REVIEW TO EXPAND AN EXISTING ) 88-02 . INDUSTRIAL BUILDING; Puget Corp,„ , ) , Applicant. The above-entitled matter cane before the hearings officer at the regularly scheduled meeting of June 8, 1988, in the Tigard 4 • Civic Center Town Hall Room, in Tigard, Oregon; and The applicant requests site development and sensitive lands review to expand an existing industrial building and to locate a portion of a parking driveway area within the 100-year floodplain, property zoned I-P, Industrial Park and described as Tax Lots 600, 700 and 800, Map 251, Section 12AC, City of Tigard, County of Washington, State of Oregon; and The hearings officer conducted a public hearing on June 8, " 19880 which was continued for further hearing on July 6, 1988, at which times testimony, evidence and the planning department staff reports were received; and The hearings officer adopts the findings of fact and.' conclusions contained in the staff report, a copy of which is attached hereto, marked "EXhibit Ab1 and incorporated by reference herein and the supplemental report of the staff, dated July 5, ` 988 marked "Exhibit " and incorporated reference herein; 1 , rl�e ��.t � �` orated ��i� re and The hearings officer further find that the applicant's request for relief from the road and utility development • standards for the area serving the Site should be denied,enied ,. The, applicant icant art. of LID for �h • �: !.. pp p i.cipated, in an e improvement 7th l e r "+! . . Avenue in 1982 . At that time, no development by the landowners , was planned and the City limited the construction costs imposed on the landowners to $95, 000. That limitation required a revision to the street standard to an "interim" standard to keep the costs within the budget. In 1984, the City approved a small expansion to this facility and made no change in the "interim" standard for the street. However, the applicant is now before the City to nearly double the size of its operation. The City consistently requires applicants to bring roads and utilities to standard in conjunction with new development. There is no dispute that the road as presently built is not to standard for an industrial area. The hearings officer believes that, unlike the burden �m used b y a to r.al improvement district which is implemented , . . regardless of the economic climate of the time, an expansion such as the one proposed indicates that the applicant's business is '0 doing well and it is now time for the applicant to assume its responsibility to meet the development standards as published and enforced by the City. The "interim" is over and this road should be brought up to standard as part of this development. ; • or'r. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT SDR 88-12 and Sl, 88- 02 be am' hereby are approved, zubject to the following conditions: 1. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING 3n.. CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED. STAFF CONTACT FOR CONDITIONS A-G, GARY ALFSON, PHONE NUMBER 639-4171; FO - IT,H . R CONDITIONS �I �Z �� b • LIDEN, PHONE NUMBER 639-41/1. ! a. Standard half-street improverients, including 2 c : concrete sidewalk, driveway apron, curb, asphaltic concrete pavement, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, streetlights and underground utilities (as practical) , shall be installed along the 74th Avenue frontage. improvements shall conform to the alignment of existing adjacent improvements. The pavement ,. thickness shall consist of 4 inches of asphaltic concrete pavement on, 3 inches of (3/4"-0) and 1.2 inches of (2"-a) aggregate baserock. The existing pavement shall be overlain with 0 2 inches of asphaltic concrete from the centerline to the west edge of pavement. b. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the 74th avenue frontage to increase the right-of•- way to 25 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms and approved by the Engineering '..I Section. Dedication forms and instructions are available from the Engineering Section. ' C. The northern driveway shall be relocated or deleted , to comply with the 30 foot spacing requirement between driveway aprons. d. A permit or evidence demonstrating compliance shall be obtained by the applicant from the U.S . Army corps of • Engineers (Authority: Section 404, Clean Water A. ct. , 38 U.S.C. . , ' 1344) for discharge of dredge or fill material into waters of the copy permit shall be provided to t United States. ca of the• .� p ed '� the City Engineering Office by the applicant. e. The applicant shall 1 �ro�ide for roof an d parking lot rain drainage to the public stormwater drainage system.. �. , • • c : f. Five (5) sets of plan and profile public improvement construction plans and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a Registered Professional Civil Engineer, detailing all proposed public improvements shall be submitted to the Engineering Section for approval. Two (2) sets of plan and profile plans shall be submitted, for preliminary review prior to submittal of final plans. g. Construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering section has approved public improvement plans. The section will require a 100% performance assurance or letter of commitment, with payment of a permit fee:' and a sign installation/streetlight fee. Also, the execution of a street opening permit or construction compliance agreement shall occur prior to or concurrently with the issuance ` , of approved public improvement plans. h. A revised site and landscaping plan shall be submitted for Planning Director approval which includes the following items: a, (1) The parallel parking spaces near 74th Avenue shall have minimum dimensions of 8.5 feet by 20 feet. (2) The northern driveway in the new parking area shall be omitted. (3) Specific species and size of landscaping materials shall he identified. (4) Specific plans illustrating how the two trees located in the southern parking lot will be saved as indicated, ,�.. ( ) T 'o handicapped parking spaces within easy access to building entrances , 1 ..1'I• 1':... ..1' n.,l a _ ..n ,... .-..pail, ...CHI....... .._«,...».. ...............u..n anLlu,...l._,_...._,,...le.-4.m...«,.....-. ,...«..r.S1L..L........1a .....uw .«. 1....1. h.. « - _ .-r..n..n.n .w w. nw. / wy a.• The 100 ea r flood plain shall be dedicated to the � p public from Bonita Road to the south property boundary. The dedication documents shall be on forms approved by the City and ., . u• I ti , I ,I shall be recorded with Washington County. I I , 1 2 . All items noted in condition 1 (h) above shall be installed prior to occupancy of the ne;.° 20, 000 square foot addition. 3 . This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final decision date. :I • : , 4 . The air conditioning nc unit and any other outdn or mechanical equipment shall cc ly with applicable DEQ noise standards. DATED this / T?_day of kfuly, 1988. HEA. NOS OFFI9R APPROVED r I �ll 111 i I I I I I I I l• I I I I i, ICI' • 7 ' PUGET CORP. C)1i' O1 . r r u, �fi G� f' 1 V+ . f lf.l d'wp 1 rl. 1,�{,,,,r 7440 SW Bonita Road I , z• y, �7 ,A Tigard, OR 97224 William A. Monahan 1r t. 12290 SW Main Suite 4A "' i Tigard,l OR 97223 �a rig John Skourtes ' 17010 SW weir Road • , ';,, Beaverton, OR 97007 •••. r a I L 0 y.r 6 Q , -/J fi',,'c ., k.i 0 r '°:., 11 1 °./' Y l /N1., 1,(.)1 It G airy;': (1,1' F • , 1 1t "�j k/4/./. °w 'r rrr F ,,,,,,,t,,, w { e r' ri M �ry� 9 F 9w1 to..F ^,�t1 1••I 1 Nr T ,Y • /�Y' 1 f ' • k I 1 } d ,ir ..: {{ I I F I I ,1/4 4" {' . , ,k k i . • x+ , ,, • a 1 .. ........... .....0 a .,., ,.. ,.,, _..,, ,...,... ..._.N u, ........,. _ .. ..,„., _ F 4� i r �[ 8TArl:: REPORT AGENDA ITEM I ,_ . ' TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER . i TIGARD CITY HALL, •TOWI11, HALL 1 1 18125 SW HALL BLVD, • TIGARD, OREGON 9722 w _ A. FACTS w . 1 , General Information CASE: Site Development Review 88«N•12 arcl Sensitive Lands Review l' 8 8-0 REQUEST; Nt expand an existing industrial building, by 20,000 square feet and to locate a portion . a � . ' «« � of a parking driveway area '' within the 100-year ?]lt odp1e in. ,++ COMIPRI;I•'ti: 1SIV1 PLNAN DESIGNATION; Light XndtAsti is . M • ZO1UI111G IDI: sIc\IATI,0111; ;z;Mr..P (Ir'ic(Astir ai )ark) APPLICAi1IT; Puget Corporation of Orc?.c on OWNER' Same • ,, 74.40 SW Bonita RoiioCl IMigarci, OR Y2'24 , LOCATION; 74.40 SW Bonita Road, (WC,I'M 281 12AC, 1 L 600, 700, COO) ' 6 W. ' N « MM d, WaIcW5 t9.1Ntrw«1w.NNI'N "g I'"'.tit1:LtWil a' A site development review (SL+R 17-73) was granted in 1 178 which allowed t the xrJatrtsior1 of an existing building. loading area wa "provided with N. a driveway onto 74th Avenue, A parkin area and landscaping was also i installed on the north and cast side of the building, In :L084, further expansion to the facility was approved by the City ( 3DR 8-84) , In ' conjunction with this development half-street improvements on I,oni,ta Road and 74th Avenue were i.rtst,:;iIled A new parking l lot wa.:3 also built, a , i. i 1. :i,t. «««;I~rt i c,t'itta;i.,r7 lr«NNNNINNIII,NN«rN. «N1111,a«.rMW�,Nw«.rNMN«NWr«r.«I r ', • The INNL (Light Industrial) zone applies to the north and east, the I-.I (Industrial Park) zone includes the property to the south, The only • I other industrial use in the immediate vicinity lies to the east, Apartment buildings zor R-12 (Residential, i c on the western side of Farms) Creek, { 4. '1,b 11'f0rr"t1gt*Li 1 arld I r.9p a], r4 ;ar��r�.i.�ti.uri • � � N,W.•iN1 11N«N Y«r«NM.NNIMII.NIWN. «NNNNN.WW ,NNWWNN�NWW« IMMNW.M«NrYN.hMMNNNINN«IMN. «I�.« 1 MNN, ti.ncc the 1084 approval, the applicant has obtained additional property and is planning to expand the plant to the south, Two houses presently '• • ore located south of thr� exi:sti,nrti industrial building and .the northerrrr 1 , i , • 8 A1F REPORT M $DD $f -12/8L 88.02 - PAGE I , , • ...C,.,..,�.:t;»._... ,..., ,...;i G, ....,.m_ .»._ ..»,r...,.....M.M.............. _..,w..,l.-w.«Ra:, ...,,„.,,....'..,. ..—.. ......-,. .« ,.,>,....,.k..M.,,....,..„,..,n.,�« w.a.«....._ .«,,,,4 r,... _.,J.w+w.,.,..wu..,..........,....�...,t.:r.._-...... ......•,...,...w...,. �,x.»...F.....,,, .. ' residence w be removed as part of this s pr'o j ectt, The new 20,000 , . square foot; 'addition will be attached to the south side of the existing ' building, A cane-way driveway will be exttenderd from the northern parking area between tthte existing building and the fl,r clpl.ai•r1, Fifty-five new parking spaces wi,hl abut the new addition on a1h sides, Along with fr,fie access provided by the one-way drive, three new driveways aro proposed ti on 74th Avenue to provide access to the parking loot and loading area, A Sensitive Lands approval 1, is also necessary because a portion Lion of the driveway and parking area will be located within the 100-year f1OOdp1ai•r ' which has a flood elevation of 135 feet. The applicant only proposes to change the existing 'grade slightly In order to accommodate the par'kiii lot and, driveway. • µ O r� .1 b �c t � ► I n .�, !��art»;i�i1 F ..�i��t�_rl��. � • The Building, Inspection Oi,vi.; ion indicates thmt if the existing house that is to be retained is op a septic system, it will need to be hooked up to sanitary sewer, , Tualatin Rural Fir e Protection J 7st rc . indicates that automatic , sprinkler' protection will be required for the addition, The Tigard ' Water District notes that there is an existing 12-inch main i -Along southwest 741t Avenue. Some of which is due to a rebate to those property owners who paid for this earlier, , It appears that lateral mains tis hydrants • � with ��fi.re' �� (arlt~I possibly Piro sprinkler syste m) wi.l.l have to be installed toward the building to comply with City .Fire Cede, • Otherwise, it is believed the development can he served aaetua1. 1y. The City Park roa has no comments r" latFd to 111 proposal,cpcsal, �� 11 of Y' » proposed I rf The �' •� 1 C» � Army I G; ► ty Engineers t� ► y�� 4� p . f � � has :reviewed tale pl.arls and Brian R. Blankenship has issued a letter indicating that a permit: ”,s not required, The Engineering Division has the following comments: ' , 1, 71esubmitted plan shoots, dated March 1988, and na � ve accompanying yin the application indicate a proposed 20,000 square feet building addition and parking lot, with access and half street improvements on 74th Avenue. 2. The subject; site fronts onto Bonita load and 74th Avenue. Improvements s wore made to Bonita 'Road and 74th Avenue by the Puget Corporation in the past to the limits of the property' at that time. �, .. The 74th LID project made interim imp ir'+avemept ''c,ons ,sting' of 1 inches of asphaltic as p hal t i�c concrete on J inches e f a ore ga t e x a erOck to a width of 2 4 foot, along the remaining site frontage, 74th Au erIue is classi fied as a local street within a n indOstMial area, • STAFF i'ZPORT - soR Cliff' 12/SL ao-O2 *- I At • • t,...4,•....,., ............."-4 ..nr .+.1,,. .» .M,.....,.,,..,d.i.,....,..,.,....,.. ...4. .. 1..A.,,.....h,.. .,.v.,.,tip,.,...,,.....µ,.-....u...., . i:., .........«.i... .-..,. ......«, ....,.o-.a•.si,.. ...A..S,,.. ,...,i:W,.ul:..ki.w.,..,...,..r,....,M„..,,..,....16,n.....,.':r,k........,..., 3'• Local stc i; pavement thickness standards nave been provi.tied by the 74th LID, 74th Avenue serves an industrial area and i•ndustrli•al pavement standards require additional pavement thickness for the increased load placed on the pavement from the trucks. To meet industrial pavement standards the existing pavement should be ' overlain with 2 inches of asphaltic concrete from the center :fine to the edge of thie existing pavement, The now, widened pavement: section should consist of 4 inches of asphaltic 'comer#ec:e over, 3 inches of (3/4” G) aggregate hawser„rack over :12 inches of (2” •- 0) aggregate law:;E rleck. • 4, The plan submitted shows three driveway accesses onto 79th Avenue. The Community Development Code= requires that driveways be spiced ire minimum of 80 feet: apart, edge to edge, The northern driveway conflicts with this requirement as it is shown to be aaa axira;ely 15 , feet Prom are existing drliveaway, a, "i"Pte public' storm drainage is shown to be collected at the southern, lowest came of the half street improvements and discharged to the west into i'=anrtc Creek'/ The public line is shown to be within a 10 root wide easement where the standard is a 15 foot wide easement dedicated to the public. " t" private storm c urna e system 7a shown to u bt collected on—site sita � y , • catch basins anti discharged d into Fanno Creak. The Uniform Plumbing Code requires es that all. private ivate s tror m, drainage catch basins uta,.1.ize a sump to collect debris. ., C No sanitary sewer connections are a aposet at this ac di1icn ' i.s n attached to the existing structure, • 7. The proposed p a r k i n g lot c, s stated to be encroaching cact. ny into the 100 year flood plain. This is allowed provided the necessary permits are obtained from the Corps of Engineers prior to construction. No other" comments have been received. 8. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS , , ythr,~y/t Planning staff has determined thtatWy Comprehensive /yPlan,/` pow/liciYes 2,1 Y 1, 82,1, 8,2,2,8,212 8, ,3, 3,513, 3, 544,,� 5.1. 1, 6.6!1,,i ''/ 411.,2,,1 ! F ,,1:�, 841'8; ' 1.1,5,1, and' Community Development Code Sections 18.68, 184100, 18, 102, y �M� 1- 18. 106, 18, 108, 18.84, 18.120, and 115,04,080 are the relevant review criteria in this case, The Planning' staff finds that the application is consistent nt' with the relevant Plan policies with minor modifications based upon the following discussion: 1,1 Policy 2, 1, 1 is satisfied heCause the City did notify i11P0 #5 and it was given an opportunity to comment, • } ., s °1�l REPORT — 8 R 84-12/SL' i 88-02 uN PAGE 3 • w , • , • • • , • ' 2. Policies 8 ,2.2, and 3 .2,8 are sati'sfied becauso the proposed . : alterations within the 100—year floodplain will not result in any rise in flood elevation. Also the streamflow capacity of the zero—foot rise floodway will bo maintained and it does not appear that any upstream or downstream changes in the floodplain will be made. • As a condition of approval, dedication of sufficient open land Will be made to enhance the groenway which abuts the property on the west. . . 3 Policy 3,b,8 is satisfied bocauso additional greenway will be • provided as a condition of approval and this in turn will represent other addition to the Fanne Crook greenway system as called for in • the Comprehensive Plan, 4. Policy 8.5.4 calls for the provision of on Inner—connected peOestran/bicycle path throughout the City. The location of this path iv not know at this time, but it probably will be located on the west side of Farm° Creek. A a result, a pathway should not . constructed in conjunction with this proposal, 5, Policy 5.1, 1 is satisfied because, the proposed expansion will provde , for additional economic opportunities and jobs for local residents, 6. Policies 6,6, 1 and 11,5. 1 can be satisfied if some additions to the landscaping plan as noted in the recommended conditions of approval are satisfied, A discussion regarding the rationale for the changes to the landscaping plan is presented below under Chapter 18. 100. 7, Policies 7.1,2, 7.2,1, 8,1.8 are satisfied because adequate public . , • facilities and services are available for this site. , The Planning staff finds that the proposal with minor modifications meets the relevant criteria found in the Community Development Code based on ' the following findings: 1 Chapter 18,68 is satisfied because the proposal meets all of the requirements of the I—P Z0h0. 2 Chapter 18.84 is satisfied because the application moots all of the relevant sensitive lands criteria in section 10.84,040(a) if the conditions of approval are met a$ indicated below. 8 , The proposed landscaping and site plan is in basic conformance with • Chapter 18, 100, however, there are several items that need to be modified in order to comply totally with this section of the Code, fr a. Additional screening 1.1eds to be provided along the west side of r , the existing building and proposed additions in order to help obscure the building as well as the air conditioning unit from the residential zone to the west. The proposed landscaping plan . shows several deciduous trees to provide this buffer but additional evergreen vegetation would greatly enhance this visual • bufPer. Olso, some sort of a wall or noise barrier should be provided for the air conditioning system. STAFF RF.PORT — SOR 88-12/SL 80-02 * PAGE 4 • 4* • . •. c . • • •. -.. • • h This �.r ,ctior of the Code requi res ras t aa aar <i7g spaces iate trees �w in &rid around them at a 'r do of ono trc. per seven spaces. at"h�<� northeastern portion of he now parking lot is without trees I� other than the street trees along 74th Avenue. Some additional • .landscaping is required here. • c When staff visited the alarge 'r<< hear 74th Avenue was r, m Doing used fior storing pallets , Any kind of outdoor storage for !' - ,1 the new develop. ' ' acn t should Inc e screening c fi either fencing o/ landscaping. , . a 1 1 , 1 because adequate u:Yx •+ i't • . � � !�, Chapter .,E3,11.C�2�'�� of t.hc. Code is satisfied fac.. G► I clearance is provided at .th e proposed driveway entrances, ; , i Y • r 5, Chapters :181 :l,06 and 18, 108 and Section 15404.080 of the Code deal ., �� a 'requirements.11 1 . , r 1 C with parking and access requirements. �These sect ions of date Code can be satisfied if the foll.owiric modifications aro made, a, The Coda requires that there be a 30 foot distance between driveway entrances, The northeastern a driveway ai the 11c w parking area is only about 115 feet south of the existing driveway, This access would either need to be removed or relocated d ira. order" to • moot, this cede requirement, Staff suggests 'that this driveway be 1 removed because, s ecaus e', in addition, the parking arrangement rt for the he 1 northeastern 18 spaces > somewhat G wcwr r c requiring two driveway s aisles but only two aisles of parking. It is felt that with the • • deletion of the driveway, the two aisles could be combined into one and less pavement would be (required to provide the 18 spaces. ♦ `, Code requires rt1 1 t , b, The Ccc c rc•`'qui► es that in a use such as this, there e b one par)<irig space<a for every employee of the largest shift l"hc`a applicant states that at 7 employees will be present at trha largest shift and therefore tI' 8 pr�.oposc ri sltaaoes will be , .. adequate to moat Code requirements,, hf�woven, the Code r�loes require that ure handicapped space be provided uir4c or c ve yl 50 required parking rki"r " spaces, A$ a result r the site play should be amended to have two handicapped parkirigy spaces Zara provided on site 6, Chapter 18, 120 deals with the requirements for Site e Devel.op►trent•. Review ti: E w af) I oval, :Ii" the above recommendations endaitions are implemented, the , w staff concludes that th e provisions of this Chapter are satisfied as , • � . . will , C;, RECOMMENDATION t3as��ii upon the discussion above, the Planning staff recommends approval •, of 8ID U$-i2/SL 88-02 Subject to .the following conditions: r r 1,1 PRIOR •ac TI• l: ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS ,i HE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS `,, SHALL 13ly C;n.,t", :;r"tl,:0, S"C(tiw".F CONTACT FOR CONDITIONS a. » g. GARY Y ALFSOi\I, PHONE NUMBER 639-4171', FOR colt' Xi,rON'; FOly h, - is, KEITH I LIDItN, PHONE NUMBER 639-41.r;i., r s I•I "aa REPORT"I" - w OR 88-.i2/SI o8-"0 - PAGE -,-\ .ham• . �' • • C : improvements,w tarc��;I half i » r 4 i f i . cr L i g concrete sidewalk, . :', driveway aparoii, curb, asphaltic concrete 17avo"rent s ariitaIr'y sewer, storm drainage, streetlights and underground utilities, shall be� ,, Y installed along the 74th Avenue frontage, re �r� iYerts shall conform to the alignment; of existing adjacent improvements . The laaveimeent thi,ckrieass shall. consist of 4 iricheis of asphia'lti;c ' concrete pavement on 3 inches chies cf (3/4"-o) and 12 inches of (2" 0) aggregate base rock, Tho existing pavement shall be overlain wit h , 2 inches of asphaltic concrete from the centerline to the west ec1rj of pavement, • b. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public <:al.00;trtj this 74th Avenue frontage to increase the right-of-way to 25 feet from the centerline Ti~ic description shall be tied to ishe existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forriu and approved d by 'rho Engineering $ecti " , Dad i cat on foams and instructions are available from the Engineering i.nc; Section, . c,, The northern driveway shall be relocated or deleted ed to comply with the 30 foot spacing requirement meat bt two en driveway aprons, . ' . c.i, A permit or evidence demonstrating compliance shall be obtained,neadl by tht applicant from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Authority! S c ion404, Clean Water Act, a U,:1,C, 1 844) for discharge of dredge or' fill material into wate rs of the United States, A c,. :� o� �, , r, ; Y », the , .: I 7 �r a. ez t`fi •t: s i is:I.;i I e.. ! y ! y J �t1 T.e,i~. �,.� t 1 ci tri. , 1 � l t�1 i lingineorimg Office by tho' applicant, ery l»J t I� . e aPPlicant shall provide fc r roof and parking ow rain drainage to thice public st':orlitw•&ter drainage e sysi.c tri, f, rive (5) $0t8 of plan and profile public improvement Construction I ` plans and one (1) Gt�ii��C construction cos estimate, stamped by Registered Professional Civil Engineer, detailing all proposed public improvements shall be sulaiiii „te ci to the Engineering Section for approval. Two sots u l plan 'ari d profile 1. plans . shall submitted for preliminary review pi,ri0r to submittal if final plans, a � , Con r r �c �: a n of proposed a tal„ic Ymp orr ierts s iall rw: cw crioin o''' ' , i until after the 1Enr inoorin section has approved public improvement plans, Tho section will require e a :100% Performance Assurance or ' Letter of Commitment, t the payment of a permit fee and a sign installation/streetlight fee, �iso, the execution cf street opening permit or construction cc)iitiDlianct agreement occur prior to, �or cori.�ur"rentiy with the issuance of . shall cr�r.. , approved ata 1 c r r j cratont lans, t ! site and landscaping plan � ia� . h� submitted for Planning Director 'appr"Dual which includes the following items: , r I 1 STAFF i,,1. poi "r - EDt ea-1,2/„w1.4 88-'02 PAGr 6 t. i I. • 4 t W L.,.J.sion of the northeast parking' 4,roa to moot landscaping and access rcocui t^etr!cor!ts, (Chapters 18. 100, 18, 106, l , t U , ■ • and Section 15,04,080.) 2) •• ho location and design of a noise laater'i.or' for the air conditioning system(s) 1lacaatt d on the west side of tho • building or the roof, 3) Landscaped buffering along th o west side of th+<o exirsti,r!cj building and proposed addition to include a combination of evergreen and deciduous vegetation, That will screen the wall when the plants reach mature size, 4) Specific plans illustrating how tht ! two troos located in the southern parking lot will be saved as indicated. d. 5) Propo'sud screening for any outdoor storage areas, • • I � ' � , to 'building 6) Two handicapped parking spaces with easy, access e ntr'arncos r The, rl r' shall , •1' i 1 `�l!+� l.C��y��at fl.i�c�cila;i,,�,!,i! fay t:lciclic�air,cca to t,ht�, pt,tlal.orc., from the southwest corner' of the one—way drive 7UC parking area r orth to Bonita Road � rc7tts point t sot,i't:ht the 100—your floodway s17al,1. .a dedicated,, ,t•:ed to the public. The dedi,cat on documents shall be on hac.. .l;�c,i.ua ! r/ � 1 I db', , 1 and � shall recorded fs. trt N rY. lr e r ` I N ,� forms approved by the City and shall. he ► ecot ded with Washington County, 2. All items noted in condition '!.h, above shall be installed prior to occupancy of the new 20,000 square foot addition 3 This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final ' decision datee t ■ ■ «,✓1 N ' ' ,IyN,w«N,«,«N,NU„uNw ' IM. «A, RLW N O i,Nr«Keith LyrrNdN,NeN••N MN, Senior Planner �. , • (ke/52100) ■ $TAP"E RrPO1 °l"'NN. 80{ 88-12/SL 88-02 — PAGE. 7 r,l 1•, �ti I 1 &Y"' 11, ( kv't ife‘I x MEMORANDUM a Agenda Item 2,1 crry OF TIGARD, OREGON , T ) O: Beth Mason, Hearings Officer July 5, 1988 d��oM, K e it h a e n Senior Planner 1 SUBJECT Amendments to SbR 88--12/SL 88-02, Puget Corporation Expansion, On June 8, 1988, ' a public hearing was held 'regarding the above case and an Oral cleci.siiirt _for ' approval, subject° to conditions, was granted, Following ' this decision, "the applicant decided to pur'su an .amended development plan, as subsequently a.reed hearing should be re-opened -to"`t;b consider the and it 'w� rbsequentl� - the hear'n sN revisions' The applicant has. submitted a modified site aria landscaping plan that includes the following revisions:•. L Ten additional parking spaces on the west side of the one-way dr�iueway. ' 2, An amended site layout and landsCapirhg plan for the new northeastern . , parking area which addresses comments made in the June staff report. 8, Although not clearly shown on the plan, the northern drive is to be _ „. omitted, • 4 Partial evergreen screening along the west side of the project. ' , 5, Though not shown, the applicant has decided to dedicate the lad year flood plain that will remain after completion of this development, 1 The staff finds the propo,;;ed amendments to be consistent with city standards .. • as d i sc u stl in the June staff report. The following J chan g es to the conditions of approval contained in this report are recommended; , i Cplr)ditiol..., „b_L A revised site and landscaping plan shall be submitted for Planning 1• Director approval which includes es the following items: i' 1>, T e parallel parking spaces near 74th Avenue shall have minimum d imen r•ians of 8 ,5 feet by 70 feet, 2) The northern driveway in the new parking area shall be omitted, • species nd size of landscaping materials shall be identified , k u rl - .«:'.f4 i.h....MtA..,re.+».x,t..H♦..v....-,,.._.-...... ..,,..,r» ., .r.......r..l.......r..'s.li,A........u...Ar4.y w..n....»xn+m .. Al ✓ww....a1-iY4.4,i.'.i.r..r,...-a .akV'-Ir.r+:—.t.-.J..LU._..l.a........,......Ai.,.... .tul.......xu*1....-1 .. .......+rx...._-VN...:.G..YV_...e.4u,...Ud S-..ugry-... _. w.y , 4(f Beth Mason , Page 2 ' July 5, 1988 r I I A , 4) Specific plans illustrating how the two trees located in the southern parking lot will be saved as indicated. 5) Two handicapped parking spaces within easy access to building entrances. .• j; r Cond:,<<:ion 1.1. The 100 year flood plan shall be dedicated to the public from Bonita Road to the south property boundary. The dedication documents shall be on k• forms approved by the City and shall be recorded with Washington County. Condition 4. The air conditioning unit and any other outdoor mechanical equipment shall comply with applicable DEQ noise standards. The staff has also completed some additional research relating to the 74th . Avenue LID. Gary Alfsons's memo of June 10, 1988, described the different street standards that were contemplated for this LID. He concluded that the decision to use a reduced standard of six inches of crushed rock on three inches of asphalt was prompted by an effort' to reduce costs. In the summer of 1982 there were several meetings relating to the formation of the LID. Enclosed are two letters from Puget Corporation to City officials; r. City .. inutes! from 6/14/82 Wand clarification 12/ , Resolution No. 82-54, and • Cis. Council minutes from Ordinance No. 82-�39 is offered regarding structural standards,l but it is clear that the project was limited to 95,000.00. • The Engineering Division recommends that the street. improvement conditions {l noted in the Staff Report remain. The reference in this condition to street lights, sanitary sewer, etc. , is meant to requite only those items that are eV needed. The Engineering Division has not had time to evaluate which items will actually be necessary. ht/5726D tftclosures • • • I I } Ii ' I t I 1; I I I r ; '" a r y. i ,, v1 4, '• '...,. . .,W....:.._•...„_...:.�...r..t•,.....l:�t.,,.........d��... - i i ......,:... •.+„•:. ,,..«c-.,.. ..:.;L.� r.::..«......,.,s., .-r...t. .,r.._«.....ate+.-.«...._..«..:4.a.:"J t.L.. t.,.:L.u.,..�._+......L,�-„AC,.r. -.�..�...,-H*°'«.. :rt..+4:1.u:-..0 ,.:�.%-r+r„x.,.r ,-, °,..,.... _ I 'tlU 4a1xfiPN YVF.,I � dl �7 i7LSm �11 ' .,y � , :„ .ca , ,' ”KYRdG3 I I 4. ,,,`%t-g.dil kqz.,,,,,,74, pii ! , C O R R'"° 0..Y R A T b O A V, 7440 S,W.BON ITIk BOAR a PORTLAND,OREGON 97223 PORTLAND PHONE:(503)539.3139 TOLL FREE: BOO)547.95990 C�y ..w; '"e— �9 }�.y'..+�wylr,.. r. 'LV %r r"++. e, iw yr,' . ,. e+' a CI tai'' r,,.. Y... .1 /.' , x p . - ¢ 4.1 'lW�as r,rrA 4 (i `..w'A' t'�.. i.Y��v �u- iu�.•r t+•hnr x h %, W,� .l':+' ;q�y.' �vf�' �1Nr. k..,, � r+” A�”'• :r. ,i� ' me. ju 7 1 . 1 . 1 1 I 1 , 1 , wY �. is wi ice., I'2.��. Cu:x City tt'r o,:. ''2i.,,,;' ,2rd p • 'Pigar'd, Oregon 97223 Dear t t Dearrr : E : 4 4 I ,,t0I.r1 0. like to tilanI., you. enr..�. "'r':� IIJ W-... for your, coo R:a:,,ti o in re uo{ w+1 rt tile "7 ,, J Y r. L.I.D. differences of opinion. , r • : y ra1 w 1 21-le +7 '� 4n �' �!.'f �” a�'`l. LM '� J.UY1 the �.ntez^�.n' UC'...<rt..r�.iL r.:•�. follows.:. •, Li_o Cot�a,cw1 4. xccat� ic�n owc..�. ca with t 1 . L. 24 foot roadvwa;;r i t. 1 ,.: -,e1 shoulders t ! . 2.. ii 4l,b m , drain 1.�y. culvert, :ld. c tea ba Ririe. 1 i 3. C u 2±11 and real .n _ 1 11 �I ` . cu+11 ox do 1a1 - . i • 5 l'o.'t. .terilong z4v.ince' cam a,P:• 4 ''',;, .' full irnpr'oveik:7'lt w.V1: '74 w i c:,: .•cnc1 , `, iLo ,. ur.tal.r.1 f4,o,xIW., / � t` 1 n '.iy�.Lr y Council v L.,.r V iw h��is�Mi l":V ,'N•�o 4 i tl h '� ♦,.•• w.w�.'y^r- .1°1�W!�W h+i.A o H 1�.M' e �..ai,+1.1r�i ✓..s W tt Y,, .�•M M 4 a. r N:+�w i ". 7, j J'1 of r.1 r i7� 724? 1 "r~ c I r'. .•+ J,L.'}'}','n i jr.�,Mc +�'.1., . '.l.r—1 r'^�•a J.., i �� E"7:G !??"J:: t?� C1L?-'.1'., »= t1, Y,a ,,.�.� ; ' Ike, the �_ �. _. �1 y t,.c:w rtr '1 'l8o1 1i e no i; a zo�'S:CI r'r':+' /'`."""' C`i Y4 'j f ',�r'crro.:i ct er't 1..:.w.. a i,:�w""' rc:-c''" r.. ',U�.�..iy t ; . 2:Lut'.r., ''';',1• 'c),, d w-;.,11 lv rt..-'r.:L.. .-' y,: -L1,0 7 rr w1,- or,-1,,,,-,,- u .� �i ';4' .f"o ''.' 1 i i. .. • w AV i, 'Lt�. •. n. �� e Xy .C t r�}Ci. .-. . �. y,., a r.F l o ry,, Y 7i.+F.+t /y i.,1•1,11() �`� w+.'+a J. „,..-.'....1..-...‘..c I y` .", { ° • ' t2,-„-.,'..t li:C..r7.Jw•..} ^,yItr' M nw..1 :,1 f4 t'.1y,G/7 "• r4.... ', "1/I L4Ji, s)laa«� be z.11:-.71.-.....,tr.".. A { + y1I r "t 1 rt .,..,..Y 1 , M 4 4 4 4f } I ,1.+r `41,«1 11 +1 y• §, +,. 1 ° 1 i `,1 } 1 . I , I 1h " d + 1 I " 1 p q 1 . y 'ti ',* � 1 I`' 1 1, , P • i A , f w n. 2 ENUE SUMMARY: AMOUNT . . . .�•• . ,ct< •, r FUND SUBTOTAL 4,466,159 , !; 0', SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 229,253 .. .", CIVIC CENTER JECT 4,9'00,t?Oa , ;'.;,•.;. GRAND TOTAL 9 595,412 .. •st'', :' tie "also reported the tai rate will decline from the present •• y $1.1'9 per thousand dollars `a,-s.sessed value to $1.12 per thousand. , • ,, ,, `., The budget, document will be changed slightly to reflect the : . union settlement and various impacts'which have occured with the • Cap:'',': downturn in revenues. ,4� . .,i'e., (c) Motion by Coi'ncilor Brian, seconded by Coun`c , or Stimler to , ,y; close the public hearing on the budget for 1982-83:''N., , ':. V, (d) City Administrator reported final documents will be rea for ' ','i,. � adoption at the 6-28-82 Council meeting. ' `y'�:; : .t+ 74T AVENUE LID HEARING •, Public �, .��:��;� �a) Hearing Operied (b) Director of Public Works gave brief history of issues noting : ,'' 'f``.', citizen dissatisfaction with scope of project and assesswent method proposed. After lengthy work with the citizens in the <,:,k;-. area, staff has reached a compromise agreement for interim . improvements to be made to 74th Avenue. Also he noted that a 4 ,t 4' non-remonstrance agreement will be required from each ter,; participant in the LID for future development for the full . `,', length of the street. ' ' f -s.i,- The interim improvements proposed would include; 24' surface ' , • ... . . edge-to-edge, realignment, cut and fill, gravel shoulders, and , , ,. r drainage by culverts and catch basins with no curbs or sidewalks. -,..e.-- Director of Public Works advised Council that because of the change in the plans and specifications for the improvements, Resolution No 82-44 is no longer valid and a new resolution ; • {"' will need to be adopted to allow for the proper a'action at a ' future public hearing. • r. r 1 (s ) Public Testimony: ; .. 17010 ' ' ... ' 0 4, Mr, John Skourtes, l7altW Wier toad, Eteatie toM, a pp ea red as an ,, �: ted party and stated t he property owners accept the N Vi: interim of im govern ents and encouraged ' Gounci - to ' approve the interim standards a's th • _'. not 'be t standard is t this time.hrah � ' pp unique .,; tl tha t .the ��. also' requested that if the bids come in over �9S,Qt� • ` '- project not be completed. Q ,� 4 ' ' ,' a Cg 5 - COUNCIL RINUTRB JUNE l4, 1912 :0", 44,,,. • • Y uu�_ ( bb �'' ",: Mr. Dan ''Mercer, of Mercer Industries, stated he was in favor of .44,,- the interim plan and the limit of $95,000 on the project and , ti. :r, felt, the method of assessment, was good when figured on schedule * , ' . . •,°,e-,,. , A-(3) as proposed by staff. (See attached schedule A-(3).) a► , ".y Mr'. G. R. Abbott, 15065 SW 74th Avenue, stated he was willing to : , go along with the LID, however, it would make things difficult ..,-.4k.:. in this time of economic recession. , : • 4gt .,5'Aq I Mr. Geoff ,Levear, President of Puget Die Casting, stated the ' interim development will serve the needs of the area. .,t ,.,I, ' (d) Director of Public Works requested this item be set over to July • . , ' ,":� r" 12, 1982 for a hearing on the new method of assessment. Staff .:41 will present a resolution at the 6-21-81 meeting to call for the ..' A i l new public hcar'ing. • ',:`r'° (e) Mr. Levear and Mr. Skourtes agreed with Director of Public *, '. �.�ri " Works' recommendation. s *.;1.7 (f) Public Hearing Closed. 4" '4 9,,.• ' • y,,''�', (g) City Administrator advised Council that due to the unusual a .F.W1.: . ;' '�. configuration of the street and land surrounding it, staff could �1 ',".11.1...,.s1,. recommend the interim improvement proposal with the k �`' understanding that a non-remonstrance would be signed for ' ti ;. :'t eventual' improvement of the entire length of 74th Avenue to City street standards. ';; w • 1. • `€ CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 82-A DECLARING AN INTENTION TO CONSTRUCT CERTAIN STREET IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN AN AREA DETERMINED TO BE A STREET IMPK 1,1911T ASSESSMENT DISTRICT TO BE KNOWN AS LOCAL STREET IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 27, SW 74TH AVENUE: DESCRIBING THE PROBABLE COST THEREOF; DEFINING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT TO BE BENEFITED AND • • ASSESSED; APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE WORK AND ESTIMATES OF THE CITY'S ENGINEER; AND SETTING PUBLIC HEARING AND DIRECTING THE GIVING OF NOTICE THEREOF. WHEREAS, the City Council has accepted petitions requesting street improve- . ments and has received a preliminary engineering report, identifying general • project scope and probable cost thereof, pursuant thereto, at the Council's regular meeting of December 14, 1981. WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 13.04 of Tigard Municipal Code, City Council • finds it expedient and necessary to investigate the improvement of the hereinbelow described lands by construction of street improvements and pursuant thereto the City's Engineer has submitted to the Council a preliminary,engineer's report • fir, the work to be contemplated and the probable cost thereof together with : a statement of the lots, parts of lots and parcels of land to be benefited and the ap,ortio iment of the total cost of the improvements which each of said lots, ' ' marts of lots and parcels of land shall be assessed on account of the benefits derived; and i ` WHEREAS, the Council finds that said preliminary engineer's report and estimates are satisfactory. WHEREAS, the Council adopted Resolution No. 82 .38 calling for a public , • L Laving on this issue to be scheduled for May 24, 1982 at 8:00 p.m.; and WHEREAS, the Council finds that said hearing date should be set over to June 14, 19432 for the public health, safety and welfare; and • WHEREAS, the Council adopted Resolution No. 82.44 calling for a public hearing on this i ssUe to be scheduled for June 14, 1982 at 8:400 p.m.; and WHEREAS, the Council finds that said hearing date should be set over to July 12, 1982 for the public health, safety and welfare, THE • 1, THEREFORE', BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP TIGARD as follows City does expedient•_ (a) That the, Cit Council oes her��y deem it e�pedien d necessary; and does hereby declare its intention to improve the aforesa ,d, ' portion f d appurtenances construction of grading, paving, storm . rt i.on of � ' drainage and pp thereto 1 (b) That all lands situated within the bOundaries described on the . attach,:d "EXHIBIT A" are determined and declared to be a street improvement assessment district, to be kn wii as SW 74th Avenue c each loft District Noy 27, �_ de- 2 ' Local Street Improvement Des � '7 and it is furl Zaed that e of lot and parcel of land 'within said r 4w boundaries wi11 be especially benefited by said improvet ents, and • • • • that the total estimated cost of $95,000 for said improvements If; shall be assessed in full, on an area basis with corner lots being :rfg assessed (1) one-half the lot area outside the 100-year flood plain, against all lands within said improvement district. c That the 12th day of July,l 1982, at the hour of 7:30 .m. hat'��Monday, th th . , p.m., • at Fowler Junior High School Lecture Room, 10865 SW Walnut, Tigard, • Oregon, be, and the same is hereby set as the time:and place for hearing and considering objections or remonstrances to the proposed improvement by any parties aggrieved thereby; however, (d) That plans, specifications and estimates with respect to the improve irients shall be submitted by the City's engineers and shall be maintained on file by the City Recorder for public inspection at least 10 days prior to the public hearing. , µ (e) '�Within ten days from the date of the publication of the notice"of '. "v. this resolution, the owners of 66 2/3% or more in area of the property s r within the boundaries described on "EXHIBIT Aar,hereto attached, may have and file with the City Recorder a written objection or remora , ° strance against the proposed improvements, such written objections , �. is, ana "suc � ' � � emons bar , or r txances shall be a bdr to any further proceeding for six (6) months • ^ to give notice e , .� •,f) That the City Recorder hereby g ' by causing to have this resolution published in the Tigard Times issue , of July 1, 19820 Dated at Tigard, Oregon this 4 day of 19 •< Mayor ;. ATTEST: lid.. .. 4 Y. City 'Recorder • Y\.7 Yp ff l { '� •+ ,UTION NO, 82-,— ' Z �. r 4 , • 6 • (a) Public Hearing Oper, • • b As-.±ciate Planner Newton noted zoning designations as reported orted , on P ning Department map. (c) Public Te imony: ` • John Skourtes, 7010 SW Weir Road Beaverton, stated his parcel is too small to •e zoned M-4 and requested different zoning be 4 considered for that. land. Bruce Clark, R.A. Gray Company, 11450 SW Tiede-an, stated that the land use has been st•rage for the last 15 years and some of it is in the floodplain. e suggested ',M-2 or, M-3 zoning,' instead of the proposed M-4, would be more appropriate. • Art Pascuzzi, 10795 SW Cascade, tated he was against M-4'' zone designations being placed on the ■ operty in the area and suggested M-2 would be more appropr ate. I Mayor Bishop stated he supported the r-•,uests presented. . Bill Wright, 10795 & 10831 SW Cascade Aven e, doesn't want M-4 zoning, and requested M-3 would be best. (d) City Administrator suggested that the issue he is what the Comp Plan designation is and suggested that Court. ;. continue the f public, hearing until staff can determine that iss'u (e) Motion by Councilor Stimler, seconded by Councilor Co to continue the public hearing until July 26, 1982 at '730 P.M. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. , RECESS: 10:17 P.M. RECONVENE: 10:39 P.M," 22. 74TH AVENUE LID STREET PUBLIC HEARING (a) Publ c Hearing Opened. (b) Director of Public Works stated this issue had been readvertised for consideration at this meeting. The street is proposed to be developed to 24' and the assessment developed " essment vyil�� be based on area with 1/2 area in the floodplain on corner lots (c) Public Testimony: • 0 John Skourtes, property owner, stated he agreed with sta ff's proposal and requested the ordinance read "the total cost not to exceed t95000° 1 4 biscusaion followed regarding whet options would be left open. 'to Council if the bids were higher than 95,000, Director of ///2. friii.VMS r• • ' n Public Works recumple_uo..:u trt.,u�� • presented„noted t .....' "assessable cost.” not "total cast, . su , t.�, ' ' leave as many options open, as possible. „ ' t. . . ' .,, Geoff.'Leaver, Pudget, Corporation, 7440 SW Bonita Road,' supported . , , . '' the rop p osa,l'. s . Of the ro' �.ct. (d) D,irectar of P�►�alir. Works. recam�ended ,approval. p � ' e) Public Hearing Closed (f) Motion' by 'Councilor Stimler, seconded by Councilor Scheckla ,to.: „ , , , . . direct staff' to prepare ,an'ordinance, for' the July" 26, , 1982 " - . ' ° . . meeting noting the "assessable cost not to 'exceed, $95,000''. • Approved by unanimous vote of Council. • (g) Stiff recommended that if Montgomery Engineers did, not wa'n't 'to' ' ' °, continue the project ,at this time, .City staff could do the " engineering. at a, reduced cost. Director, of Public, Works. will i. examine .contract. with. Engineers to. see if this is �possible,. , ' _ . " :23 cKENZIE/ST. 'ANTHONY'S' STREET LID PUBLIC HEARING . � �. . (a) blic Hearing Opened __.. , (b) "Dire6:' or of Public 'Works' stated that due to a condition placed '... on St, ' ' thony''s ditring a. zoning process, there eras a petition ,, ' generated o request the LID on McKenzie Street ,for ,stree improvement: This would be from Pacific Highway .to Grant 1 Street and Mar "' n. Engineeringi would` do the engineering of the' project at ,the re 'ues�t of the church. The LID was figured 'on :a I, ` front foot basis at total cost of X56,312.70, i' 1 ,, �, ' Director` of Public Wor1's , d•vised ,Council that the project is I ' proposed fot a 28' wide on Ewa y street with,' asking on each side 4 and a restricted. entrance fro' Pacific'llighway to about 26' for safety purposes.: . Discussion followed regarding the p z.1..tig arrangement along the street. NN De aent should be � Mayor aBishop stated the State Highway ep �, ', . '''' ' : ' '.' ','' , : contacted regarding this deVel.opment• Direc'to o£ Public Works, d. stated 'that was the City's normal procedure a'f'te ,tte Council _ ifi declared where the LID project would be placed: ,;, (c) Public `festl.mony. o 'Dennis' enn nger, St Anthony's representative, urged diagona parking and requested support oche LID'. :', a Floyd Sergnann, o finer of "loyd'.s t�eetaurant, requested approva1.' �� , I - of diagonal, parting as it viould seem safer, 1le '.also, mentioned ) . C �y••r i L�r ii ' h Cr • • IA ;v1•#,rn,''.4- :�4, ,, 4� A , " ti t. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON " ig. , ORDINANCE NO 827 ' 1 'C CONFIRMING AND RATIFYING THE RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF JUNE 21, • RESPECT TO SW 74 i STREET r ; I. (`:( T� AVENUE 'S IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT L.I.D. #27) , r : ' RATIFYING AND ADOPTING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES FOR CONSTRUC'T'ION e'er' T IMPROVEMENT: DECLARING RESULTS OF HEARING HELD WITH RESPECT THERETO: Ii SOLICITATION OF BIDS FOR CONSTRUCTION; PROVIDING FOR THE MAKING OF SAID 1 . ir , AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. T o• . NOFAS, a resolution was duly passed by the City Council of the City of Tigard at '•'ar Meeting of June 21, 1982, copy whereof is hereto attached and by this «:,•made a part hereof to the same legal force and effect as if set forth herein it:11; y r the terms of which the boundaries of a proposed street improvement assess- � �•', ct were described, and the Council deolared its intention to construct a; _' '` iprovement, and to assess the costs thereof against the property within the • ,tr. a specially benefited, assessable cost not to exceed $95,000; and G'• ,ti•s, by the terms of said resolution, a hearing was duly called to be held r •104,er'Junior High School, 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard, Oregon, on July 12, •.r'r' , the hour of 7:30 p.m., for the purpose of affording an opportunity to any ' . :u:`sieved, by the proposal to make objections or remonstrances to the proposed e •t' ..'`ay Y!'+ t; and s, : , pursuant to said resolution, due and legal notice of said hearing was . ' :' �:� lication in the Tigard Ti ' • ,� �� g Times on July 1, 1982, prior to said hearings; �'� Y t `r ' 4 ,,.,?! : ' , said hearing was duly and regularly called to order and held in Fowler '' .gh School at 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard, Oregon, on July 12, 1982, at . • of 7:30 p.m.; and • b, A s, by the terms of said resolution and publication, written objections • €rances from the owners of not less than 66 2/3% of the property within .�; nd ies of said area were invited, a all objections and remonstrances as ,.* Osented prior to and at the hearing represent the owners of less than 66 2/3% . perty in the area within the improvement assessment district and that the ""• of remonstrances is not a ban to further proceedings in the making of e i Vements; and 'fi , a '•'. ��: 11 proceedings to date have been in conformity with 223.387 and 223.359 • ,,n and a ,I�ised Statutes and Tigard Municipal Code, Chapter l.�r of the City of Tigard, hrocedUres were regularly and lawfully conducted; y , , THEREFORE, r ,:r6 , t' `iQITY OF TIGA D ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS ". . ' 'fie That all matters set forth. in the resolution. of the City Council of the 4. City of Tigard, Oregon, on jon.e 21; 1982, 'a copy whereof is hereto attached A,cc�� :�' marked Ethi i it "A" and by reference herein made a part 'hereof to the' saw • . `R, "�1:5' ' legal force and effect as if set forth herein in full, be and the same 4.{ �,.:' are hereby approved, ratified and confirmed, except that item "b" •therein 1 • a u' •. • '..Y; ., ;rt' shall be construed to read that an assessable cost not to exceed $95,000 •;.� 14,-•'. shall be assessed in full against all lands within said improvement ", ,"',%, district, by the method described, and the bouridaries of the area known .,� �•:fir :h 'a . as SW 74th Avenue Street improvement District as heretofore described . �a` , in said resolution, be and. the same are hereby declared and fixed in , accordance with said description. ..• ',,v '�'� ; That the City Council of the City of Tigard, having acquired jurisdiction v,:" or order the improvement to be made; does hereby authorize and direct kr; the construction of street improvements within the boundaries of said ,,,w SW 74th Avenue Street Improvement District in conformity in all reasonable ,,,T, ,culars with the plans and ` part p specifications by said resolution adopted . f`M'' and hereby ratified, modified and confirmed. City�A'� ,,�. That the Cit Administrator and the City Engineer be and�they are hereby, ;,,. l y ng be, y a, ;4 .+.I directed immediately to invite proposals for the construction of said ^, ,�r Improvements by publication in the Tigard Times in not less than t • ''r „,3 consecutive issues, the first publication to be not less than ten (10) • •. '4;1:.: days prior to the 2nd day of September, 1982, at the hour of 2:30 p.m., i '�'k;,. which date and time is hereby designated for the openitlg of bids in the City • " ,;:� of Tigard, Oregon, City Hall, all proposals to be then and there publicly . A,,; read. f, , Iggii: That° inasmuch as it is necessary for the peace, health, and safety of the people of the City of Tigard that the said improvements be constructed City g � +.. �� '" the least possible delay, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and • ` ...V.,:(.:9?"..I'''':,' this ordinance shall become effective upon its passage by the Council 1 ,. and signature by the Mayor. r r • ,:'°'y,, PASSEt by the Council, by unanimous vote of all Council members present., ' ma ,,. .* read three times by number and title only, this day of ,/,1„1,1 ' r.• Recor.er City of Po a.rd ' » By,the Mayor, this ,22 , day of ,t / , 1982 r ''''''7 ,(.,. d , i a� Mayor -- City of, Tigard '. . .gp: 1 q• ■ .„4.:1.,::i: ( t - a u 82`= '. tr a�V' •N W 1 , • Girl OF TIGARDOñEGON SENSITIVE LANDS APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall; PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO. y.-1T-o r- OTHER CASE NO'S: /'2 RECEIPT NO. APPLIGATIO7 IrCEPTED BY: /1-" DATE: 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Application elements submitted: ' PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION 7440 S.W. Bonita Road /(A) Application form (1) --7111Er `(B) Owner's signature/written TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO. 2S 1 12 AC lots 600 700. 800 authorization ✓ (C) Title transfer instrument (1) SITE SIZE 4.41 Acres Assessor's.map (1) II PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER*Pu et Cor oration of Oregon r(E) Plot plan (pre-app checklist) ADDRESS 7 40 S.W..W r Bonita Road PHONE 639-3339 t F. Applicant's s St , CITY Tigard — ZIP 97224 (pre-app checklist) APPLICANT* Puget Corporation of Ore oily_ Geoff Levear _/ (G) List of property owners and ADDRESS 7440 S.W. Bonita Road PHONE 639-3139 addresses within 250 feet (1) CITY Tigard ZIP 97224 (H) Filing fee ( • *When the "owner and the applicant are different , . people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a leasee i n possession r ession with written authorization DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE: from the owner or an agent of the owner with written . 1ry authorization. The owner(s) must sign this - application space provided page two or FINAL DECISION DEADLINE submit ,• ppl,.icatian in the s acry rov3 ded on _ a written autho,.xaation with this application. ° , COMP. PLAN/ZONE DESIGNATION: • " 2. PROPOSAa S UMMARY t-4 The owners of record of the subject property request a Sensitive Lands Permit to allow construction of parking area within the N.P.O. Number: foot elevation e A Koval 135 �'o leva�L ion into the flood plain. 1�p . Date: parking area that is below 135 foot will con P � conform Final Approval Date: to the existing coi1tours. Planning 0.52313/13p Engineering ' ae d: 5/87 uu I • ' w w.R...............v..,.... .A ,n..,. ...-._ i.., . ..r,._..v. ♦..u,..n........A.i.-...1.-.... i.4A....+41iau..»n.w......i--r+l-..-MMr.Il.n.._....u..r..+.«..x,.....,....H.,........+ ..........-. ..,.-J. ..r+:l u...,i.w ...+1_.f._.-+ -.+_..:.i..♦-aa.rl-1.t.1: .;a.uti.Y:.c.r{1...a.0 A.,.li: v.v ray. ., i ... . 3. List any variance, couditi.onal uses, or other land use actions to be considered as part of this application: a icatiamis made along .,.th a site deyeloUmenfi review proposal. 4. Applicants: To have a complete application yod will need to submit attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. 5. THE APPLICANT(S), SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that maybe attached to or imposed u; o n the subject property. B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are • false. 1 including of the application, ire contents f e U. The applicant has read the entire g the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. DATED this sixth da y of May 19 88 • SIGNATURES of each owner' (eg. husband and wife) of the subject property.' ti rII l a (KSL:pm/0737X') • A,' F " • . .,A;, !TY OF heARD, OREGON SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW' APPLICATIOTd CITY OF TIGARD 9 13125 SW Hall PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO. '51212-._: ''g° OTHER CASE NO'S: . I I w I ' RECEIPT N0. APPLICATIO ' ACCEPTED BY: f -- DATE. 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Application elements ''submitted: PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION 7440 S.W. Bonita Road (A) Application form (1) f ,(B) Owner's signature/written TAX MAP AND TAX LOT No. 2S 1 12 AC lots 600" 700 800 authorization (C) Title transfer instrument (1) SITE SIZE _ 4.4 res (D) Assessor's map (1) PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER Pu:et Cor oration of 'Ore on 1./(E) Plot plan (pre-app checklist) f ADDRESS 7!^+40 S.Gl, So its Road PHONE 639-3139 (F) Applicant's statement CITY ZIP 97224' (pre-app checklist). APPLICANT* .211gatS'zors.ton of Oregon, Geoff' LevFar w /(G) List of property owners and ADDRESS 24 F.a.8._.. J ?ta Road PHONE 639--3139` .% addresses within 250 feet (1) CITY ZIP 97224 1 ' CH) Filing ($ 5-, /'-5 ) • 7'�g�YSl. ... ...�.,_... ling fee When the ,owner and the applicant are different people, ` Pp the app'i:ca be the purchaser of record ' see: in possession it . nt mugs r u . or,a lea on with written authorization DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE. from the owner or an agent of, the owner with written authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application the sace provided on two or FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: PP on in t space n page � DEA.DL • ubmit a written authorization with this applications submit , COMP. PLAN/ZONE. DESIGNATI ON: 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY o ert The owners of record of the subject property elo ment reviews approval to N.P.O. site development - ., request e p PP Number: allans eX all e�x stirs matiu.f ow p ion of Approval r0 vat ate, feet of building I f aoz•lity b� adds nL 20;000 sgua.re f _ 1. the south end of the structure. Final Approval Date , area !to PP . I I ' Planni Engineering 0524P/13P ! Re v d !5/87 I , ' • .i .,_, .., i . . - a.. .,-...., ,,, r i i _,a _._ . ., ."Nl1X..i.............:...neu ...-..w..6:..1H n1"Wt..tJw-n (. .. ..._ r i- 3. List any variance, conditional use, sensitive lands, or other land use actions P . , to be considered as part of this application: sensitive lands212r22a1 i sough,fi to allow .I •o OU"0 0 , _ °the parking facility below the 135 ft. elevation {. • 4. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attac:hm:nts A described in the attachea information sheet at the time you submit this application. Y 5.. THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY 'THAT: A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that, may be attached �. attached to or imposed upon the subject ►roperty. l . B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and t'h . applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this, application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. DATED this. day of sj, ' 1988 SIGNATURES of. each owner (ego husband and wife) of the subject property. �f (KSL»pm/0524P) ♦ Sw , r 1 AP • • ' K N ' AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING • \. , STATE OF OREGON . ' County of Washington ) s». . • . City of Tigard X, ,�.; . �.�4.. +�e�� , -being first duly sworn, ©�e oath depose r an1'"'s'•°iy: / •Pi•ase irint That I an a,) it , ; 1/ . . I' ' , for . i The City f y.`tgast�,.� ®r fDgon. That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEAR.INC for: That I served NOTICE OF D',ZCISION for: ) City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Planning Commission igrd Hangs Officer ,: • i Tgrrd. City Council • i copy (Public Rearing ttoticeIY1otice of Decision) of arhich i c,aatttached (Marked tichibit "g") was maiLml .to each *aged ons at the address shy on the , • attached.list eked exhibit "B on the n de.' y of ., 4..d' �/:r �l98 ��' . � said notice. NOTICE OF •DECE ON' as hereto attached. was posted on an r °aai'pprop ttte bulletin board on the day of , • 1,.. ,; , • and deposited in the United States, tail on the . ,day o ,,e/� ,alp'' « 1984 postage prepaid. ` j Y F i r, w f d a 7 ,: i. . . �'( .,,� ,.�, 4 Person arho �os�itted on Bulletin Board ,/ +� (Fo'r 'Decis on Only)I ,, (:----, 'r ram. * y,ell...-red POST OFFICE 5K . if ..... ,„,,, „ Subs . n the da i 44,-198 ci . Gribas a�tid♦e's4i to lefEor.c �e o t°£ �� nor�f��r ?. • t't�tpN 7i"lI�,KUNJTGY�b,M ,i•��Ly,ujWp a P, gym . * 44 104,1 C r • ,kr.r ' u! �,i m ..i !}o- r i, ��r+w:r:a'd'""` yy • 4tir r,,., l''r' NO /MY PUBLIC far' 1 E GON {/ l w a 1 , . R N O T I C E OF P U B L I C H E A R I N G NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AT ITS MEETING ON •" MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1988, AT 7:30 P.M. IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER TOWN HALL - 13125 SW HALL BLVD. , TIGARD, OR, WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOVING APPLICATION: FILE NO. : SL 88-02 & SDR 88-12 NPO 5 IF FILE TITLE: PUGET CORP. OF OREGON APPLICANT: Puget Corp. of Oregon OWNER: Same 7440 SW Bonita Road OR 97224 it RL..IUEST: An appeal of a Hearings Office' approval with conditions to . expand and existing industrial ouilding by 20,000 square feet and to locate a portion of a parking and driveway area within the 100 year flood plain. LOCATION: 7440 SW Bonita Road (WCTM 2S1 12AC, tax lots 600, 700, & 800) (See Map On Reverse Side) THE PUBLIC HEARING IN THIS MATTER WILL DE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF, PROCEDURES ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUN CITY HALL, OR � ' ' = . ' OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH . t PERSON HAVING RUL'�S SET k TH II�t CHAPTER 18 3O ANY P THIS MATTER MAY ATTEND AND BE HEARD, OR TESTIMONY MAY BE SUBMITTED BE ENTERED INTO THE RECORD. , I FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY REC ORDER OR PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT: 639-4171, CITY OF TIGARD - 13125 SW HALL BLVD. , TIGARD, OREGON 97223. dj/6805D { F • , '-,,, i CIVIC , s.w a ynR •. , .. CENTER ,� At YARN, I.. PARK ^ - \ \ ugA to WARD' �. sr °o 42SENIOR "-~-- SW, ( 1 J i 044M0 4 g ER 1 1 ( \\. Il 11--) \ . . . l STREET /�, lFPY ., . .::El MUM a am \\::\\::':\\\\\ "----E�+GCw000 _ STN Ey-./� ' �. ( ,,W, TECH CENTER DRIVE' \ . ill h ,..,..._,....1.``\ ...< ,...,.« ., `�\ �;\� 0 . .. ....„ ..,-- ,. 1 112 ,-" ¢° `•S' 1 S.W LANDMARK LH. • T.. S.W•+CLONI CNCEM;�Iy p��,�; ��' • rte-- ' �dll t I Ilk if F'a n i t' , •4 1 . - w.1 FANNn 11 q �i �, X111 J p44 :: ll r04 ?>,,`. I _IISM• .N VIEW I.N. w ", �' i 1 -6 S,W I I , II-w w • . t, 5W WF.AVER sw o GFjEENSWA D l H '1111$U ib0"- ,r WAY 1 Ill; NI-t. '.' __ lir' a ,.N N m 5 WW` �oM m RD. .1 _�, 1-1- . 1 vol — . �� s,w INEx,r, � +y � �,p, . I .� � �. ..�y� �1 "4 �i PUS 71:49C,,e,Pio`.4�,P��`�f• crlNrar,obK . 'igr 4 t:a ,� Pi ':I /��/ * y _ = • t� -=— 4`�,/M - %.,', f, , .col ox�E PINE@ROO,i a, /z )>I Sr. ] A!! � ; r 1.a lo A 13 la i l TA _s.Murooev I ST.le 1211111 , J 0•W LA 4ANC{A OT. �` G W: i, Ui' SCI ui _ m '+,�M .,1....F._,..,,t0.1.1,-- ..•' AIM r __„, _ _______t_ ., . Hm3 q c _.»..491 lA Sall. + . . 1 npi,c0,),-. , : W STL UND Ty u, y,+; 9.}1'. ROB'S SIRE y i I } ; , „,,,m,,... ....0 II �� :6) I, ,{ ti '..d.".\.•••.. .r.....i......:~ ...1 x�ar h 1` ill w .. �- `� rl RABLE LN, p 1 „,.. 1', ‘ "le a Iii,1 S f t„, ..............___.. I.4 :.W. Na LET s , .•j.k Y a ` Ili \c” ' , l'.:',? .,. ow . ,-) al x MK.k, itra. 7 „,.. ' � \ i 4�� -� �,y11r �� L l'riAV., � w{ .5.- MI AIL iN Y `'x ,`?r ... s.µ m� u). _4 AV, hr I 1111 v s V� ✓rMiM tor y�.fr' K .'7-\''V'' µ: I _ . atollI 1 111.1 ._ . '`' ,, .�,, il?'' v. •_. �'' �:.°,w. M m s W� VII' btid�.t .. � �. , 1 ,� -� r � fa, � �,r...„ yi',,N.t , r 1 TREATMENT 0 r / t I 4 • • • C 711 tr•+ 1300 • Tennant Investors • • P.O. Box 1658 Portland, OR 97207 1400 II 1200 Davis, L.R. & Starkweather, R.i . Koeber, George & Jacquelyn , & Ivan Starkweather Nelson, Gale & Ann •. ' Rt. 2, Box 474 K 7269 N. Adams Dr. Lacenter, WA 98629 Madras, OR 97741 , 1500 300 • Brown, Hilton Harcienne terrace Assoc. 301 N4 Murray Road P.O. Box 389 Palo Alto) CA 94302 . � r Portland,� �OR 97229�� - , 1600 100 L. Columbia Sunday School White, Norman Et & .. . John Haviland 7455 SW Bonita load d Ra . Tualatin, OR 97062 1900 Orbanco Bldg. Portland, OR 97204 • 200 �,' C�oello, George & Mildred . °` 14760 SW 76th • Tigard, OR 97223 1800 William A. Monahan Warl .ck, Frank &" R. Harrington t 12290 SW Main St. 5575 SW Multnomah Blvd. 11 Tigard Or 97223 Portland, OR 97219 400 Puget Corporation of Oregon ' rational Safety Co Geoff Levear • B 'Harrington Ind. Plastics 7440 SW Bonita Rd. Anaheim, California 92801 . Tigard Or 97223 500 A-1 Craig Hopkins • Skourtes, john R NPO • 17010 SW Weir Road 7430 SW Varnes OR 9 700 Tigard 97223 Beaverton) 7 9 � �':�� and� Or 72� 900 Koeber, George & J. Nelson 7269 N. Adams Dr. Madras, OR 97741 10001 • ° Mercer, D.E. Trustee Austin, Neil,r Trustee • Jensen, Albert, Trustee PO. Box 10166 'or tlatid, OR 97210 r • , 1° , n , _......,wx ............._..,,. .. ...,.... __..•,.,, -r..., _._..� .. .,.,..,.,., ._... .,_.,.,., ,,.....y _..... ,._..,.,.._,,,.......mh,..,R.....-,. ,.,,..,«.+•.tw_-..,, ...,,,• i....•. ..,.,,...-.,+....a._......u._..,..+,.,.'.,u,.».,,.a,•.a.,.«,,,...,. _,a.iu..,.. .,..,rr,.ti. M { ( „ , . , k ' - , SO . n , -.1 2 H . . ' ✓ .;,.... --- -.. H ' V _ , .,, , . . . , . , , , , , ' ,, ., _ AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING : • STATE OF OREGON ' ) : County of Washington ) ss. • ,, City of Tigard ' ) I r 61fry e; elia1b"ai"l duly p, being first dui. sworn on oathlde ®se and say; Plea a Print . That I am a I for , The Cit^ .of Tigard, Oregon. • ' That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING for: " That I served NOTICE OF DECISION for: . City of Tigard, Panning ,Director ' T1gard 'Planning Commission "Tigard Hearings' Officer Tigard City Council A c opy (Public Hearing Notice/Notice of Decision) of! which' is attached (Marked ' Exhibit "A"): wag' mailed to .each named porsans at the: address shown on the'' r , ' , ,r; attached :List marked exhibit "B" on the _/7 7 day of ,'22 � '195 . ,.1 . ' said notice NOTICE OF DECICION as hereto ,attached., was posted on are ' a propriate bulletin board o� day .�.2....._. ..__._...___....;,.., 9 p n. the ,/��' da of � � _ l .. :and deposited 'in the United States Mail on the /. 7 . day of� ��, ,. ' ,s, 198 postage prepaid. ., ,a �:,. . .�._.. a ' ' „/Si nature Person who posted on Bulletin ' oard . (F'or Decision Only 1 .r ,� ''. .1, " ! ►,�., , , Person who :del'avered to Pt`' OFFICE ' ,i r'ibe4,and s worn to before Me, on the ,clay cf / ( :• p 19 e A A Jy�l r ' , I I I 3, I k+ ,*, k h ! �, N w�ro'yP'Y:. rte,"4✓✓✓ i 1� }"y' T "` �i' 11,1 ^ r I ' f-G� M. q a� .,:ti„,f4'iW rid t -' l r, ,...d.. - ��n a '�}g ry��y t�0 OTA. ,PUBLI Or OB,EGON ,. 'I Thy Cot iiss ;ari Fxp to „, , I f r ,' , 49..1'. .' , . .,'I • , , , , •-, • ', • , • '- -'•-'• l'••• - -----•••-,••••••••••,•;i.'' -- --:::'."''ll ... .. . 0" 4ii, •I ,11;i I I • M k w ».{,_ .. _.r w..i.«x...4 H r.A.,. ...,rw,11...,+.,.w..........raA'A...,n»—....,n+J.4,.,-..,..,r.»...a......,.w,«.xNa.....A...x,.......r.....» ..»rY...1........,r.a................w,.ir....xi.x..i.n ,+....,..I..w x.,... c:L.i-H.+✓.4...,1....wv+ ..«..—.a4r.aM.rS,. rt.awf.«e rI_.n..-,+e'IA iU_.x... .....,a .. � e./N' 61// / • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING I. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE CITY OF TIGARD'S HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A . MrSIiNG ON WEDNESDAY, JU ; , 8, 1988, AT 7:00 P.M. , IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE " • . TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BLVD. , TIGARD, OREGON, WILL CONSIDER T"hE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: • FILE NO. : SDR 88-12/SL 88-02 NPO # lk I FILE TITLE: PUGET CORP. OF OREGON ; APPLICANT: Puget Corp. of Oregon OWNER: Same 7440 SW Bonita Road / - Tigard, OR 9722 REQUEST: To expand an existing Industrial building by 20,000 square feet . ' and to locate a Portion of a parking and driveway area within the 100 year flood plain. LOCATION: 7440 SW Bonita Road (WCTM 251 12AC, TL 600, 700, 800) (see location map on the reverse side) a THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 OF THL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OP PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL. ANY PERSON + HAVING IN'T'EREST IN THIS MATTER MAY ATTEND AND BE H1AR. •, OR TESTIMONY T� MAY BE ■ BD � STa;MONY' B SUBMITTED STAF AT 639-4 X71 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.RECORD. PLEASE, CONTACT THE . . 1 { i. . N. TIGARD CITY HALL IS LOCATED AT 13125 8V HALL BLVD. , TIGARD, OREGON, 97223 - OR � CONTACT YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION (NPO) # i. YOU p CHAIRPERSON IS: a YOUR I. Chairperson: Craig Hopkins Phone Number: 639-5823 . l.e/4743D e ,,._ ,�� ., , ..ti' s,.;, ......... ..... <., o. i h a • i t. A, . ' ' ' • ,/ ' ,.........«... ....,,.:,a i'.. ....._- .., ...,_.,,...,.. .. ......,...,+ .......... .,,„.,..,.,.,.,,, ..-,.. ...,' w. a:44...:.i.,......... xw....,ti............:. »...s, .,,.......r4...:.ta.w..,:.«.-„I,..._.«,-.,.:-a4.rak.e..,ax;w:;::aa;w--;a::..4.,rxi-,._.J....,.,:.u-.._....,., . .«+,.. • 1300 111 Tennant Investors P.O. Box 1658 Portland, OR 97207 . 1400 1200 • Davis, L.R. & Starkweather, R.M. Koeber, George & Jacquelyn & Ivan Starkweather Nelson, Gale & Ann Rt. 2, Box 474 K 7269 N. Adams Dr. Lacenter, WA 98629 Madras, OR 97741 1500 300 Brown, Milton Marcienne Terrace Assoc. 301 NW Murray Road i P.O. Box 38,y '' Portland, OR 97229 Palo Alto CA 94302 • 1600 1� 0 L. Columbia Sunday School 14hite, Norman Et Al % . 7455 SW Bonita Road John Haviland Tualatin, OR 97062 1900 Orbanco Bldg. Portland, OR 97204 200 A' City o/Z Tigard Coello, George & Mildred 14760 SW 76th , 13125 SW Hall �Blvd. � � � � � � � �� Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 • 1800 William �. 1 Yam A. Monahan. ° ' Warlick, Frank & R. Harrington 12290 SW Main St. 5575 SW Multnomah ;Blvd. 1 Tigard Or 97223 Portland, OR 97219, 400 Puget Corporation of Oregon National Safety Co. Geoff Levear B Harrington Ind: Plastics 7440 SW Bonita itd A I • 7' California 7 i Anaheim, CCalifia 92801 Tigard Or 97223 , 500 A-1 Craig Hopkins Skourtes, John 'R 17010 SW Weir Road 7430 SW Vaes Beaverton, OR 97007 Tigard Or 97223 900 Koeber, George & J� �: l s b 7269 N. Adams Dr. Madras, OR 97741 I� 1000, 1100 Mercer, D.E. Trustee • Austin Neil, Trustee Jensen, Alber L i Trustee {{ P,0. Boy 10166 I Portland, OR 97210 a e • a • ` K d , u. . 6 { ,4 ,)„.... ..,... ...I:•.4'',';..i.,1.', .• ..,,'.1. 4..:,I,.„,,,,,,,...1,,.:'1•,1•4\,.:. .„4„7. o • a ,!•f:t' I'Q(AL rrR� ' M,., * '' r,n a ,Lj' Y T I a �a' PAflKW4V " , .,R'9,rout s..NTE. \ M",. 7—_ Y• •) ,., It JAIINA 1 4,r«.'s I r j�! l J y _ . L 0 A A r QM 9 q \M , i ---—p .. .......\th4ti., . , ,• , , , , k W J _ . 0 l. . . r, . , F1 It it N •..., , \Ivyn,-. »- S w w. Its 0,42 le ''',',Z,,,,''\'',-,,, ' . . 111''..1.'''':'- '''*I' 4 " 1 ,1. " 1, �.' ` r ` ,. ,, r .-.,,d_1 i a,:N J,.., 1 .��„uR s. n r I' . . : 1,. _,,i, ...i".. /"." .,, : 1 . .,. , , .,„ _ . P 1 '' t+'��ra.+�r. *".":"H ' . ill1 r • IY1 )I': 1 � , , " 110 •:;.�)..�...1. ,,.,.._.s...�r a��4 �, 4 I ,_— •. �''1- - . , .,m I i l I .,. ��. '+'1'. -. .. 1 7.)6 A" �,. .- • -_..71.—.�,.... . , Ir..1 ._ I I ,,, 7_ 1 " I 1 I t`,"+ 5,V r AN,,,aAr1n 1x,T,4a.c ::T:1e' :1'r '` ,A ,n �k ,. ;' /eT/l ,• H , w,i 3 w,,FANrd!1 " ,...,,,,, D.: •" j q I,^ '''-1,4i.:. I t i I :: ' I2 • 1 . r_ �,.i M i ''i 1 1 --, z ' ilk. s,.-. 4,0), . . ‘ ---,-.4 4 -'i - „ ,. , d spa x r' 9 fp „� „r I A , j Lr ,T" �,'� ,;,, a"�,i, �,' C., 1.r I '1 H' ' 1 .,, Ptaget ,Copporatri,on 1� �.+ ' � '' I, ,'1,1 'I •' "- bf Q.pect O. ,.Sit.i 1,11. Vi i ',,* �%' 1 i 44 i.I.k'I!. 4..r I 1. `,, .*,,' . ,1', ,..i .,:i t---■ ,,_ .., I ' ' 1 , —I I!' "),, :,::.A,\ , if imL '' . ' 1 • •._._,, .,, _ , ,,, , ,- i. 1 1 , .t:t.i ra—I— ,.* IAA i i i.: 4::',.; 1 tl't, 4,V., ''' "“ '11 ' I . 1 1 ro t, '°,, r W M'r DQCI w ,1. .ate ,, ,'' l , ^L ,'! t^�J h A IH ; I,S7,1,..",,::::.1.5: ! { 4 ., -.1. u+ ..{I�t 1.j -.,11 i''191 „.,,1,:,)' t t T� ' '' P . I .,.. /{� �I{, �1 , , ,I p.,1.k, w �.i I,.. wu+arw CT r "I m, �ti I,1; r�-I ',i 1�r, r , ' I 1 r , . : m .,� 1 j \, 'a'y t 3 '', yam'` ; �l ,I--..1 «, Y'. !, , , ; � + r,I.f.�•�'+y...� r...l.,, .r.r..,e.� „...' «' .I! .-3. . ,.m,.' t,,• +t A «.,,-..,...»..... r 6r '4'f I � 1 �" �'' ..'.1 $ H R3g5_11RE /. _.J,I I ,!' 1.. ,, . ',, ,, ., i- .. . . . . .: ., 1 ,.. j .. •1 I y, 7 '' r �\ ' 1 I It 1,; +S'" .. , . . ,, ' f I ,+ . • .,•\!:,,, • ''''''' ' 1 '' ' ' ' '''' Iril*-ifie .'' . 1 Il' x_ _.. _ • •; ' ' di 1-.... ..... ..-4 , i , ::R. 45 ...,.___:_,_ ..,-1p,,,,,_ \\ 1.. ,. . .1 i ': ' '. • . ,, ..L . , .„,,,... . . . . 1 , it., . ,. . . ..„ ..) . .,',.,,_., „,, ,. ... .I. ...J.. i' . :).. , ... , . .. -!,, . . : 1. ,- -; 1.......,.....i.brici4— ,, , ,i ....4.44. .4. 4 -1.. •.4 4,, ,, \\t I r { 1 I, j ti +1"T l:f'� nl ; I " ,\r a.. "�x,4' �,cF" " ..4i, 1 r N,� n''41,:.:1''.!. 4..Y.::., It.,„1— ' •,L. :, .'..: ,;41,, ,,,,ILLL.,41 — !,,i ii, ._I Lr!.. ..,. . ,,,,. ,, ill I "."1" [ T1 I„,d''''r",iuj.,,,I I-rre 1 -ri'r'rte' ' , ,o• • , I,S I I rY rr : L —L.1 ,{144' i n; ` .1111. 11'1 i ". ~.� �.,._ r", • a.f, 1 ,"' ./'.'; \`\� i tr' ,\'' , „ ,r w '.'.1,"iu.,...� I m''n 11-..,i, a,Ratio"Rp I _ '\,1 I/1. , - ,N..\ ,.1 _. }} , 1 't � h r w _At) t.•1 !)�'.„'r1 1.i �_l l�.� «.r L ... 1 t ” ltarinr+ l^{ �• l r, 1 "�t. \i J 1'I 1 t <i� y /: ,: 4......), ' I ' ''''''1.....• '. . / ry'...;,...-„:4:_,/^.-, .,,t,-,,"'"-' : '., '., : ...,,, it,4. �! v . r , ,.0.•,i a oREGQN I . f•'• TR» TM IF G J w, / I . /r afGCN ' r T , F • n '• ■ TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY (# 'a Legal • • BOX 370 PHONE(603)684-0360 Notice 7-666 7 P.O.B w BEAVERTON,OREGON 9706 .LN w Legal Notice Advertising , t ,, CITY Q F T IG A RD 0 Tearsheet Notice 0/ P0 Box 2339'7 . ry s 0 Duplicate Affidavit 1 i4a rd 9 0 r'n 97223 F. 223 ,0 0 fb CJ AFFIDAVIT OP PUBUCATIOI*I , E OF OREGON, . STATE �as COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ) . l - .. a ar cf , . a .. being'first duly sworn, depose and say that],am the Advertising Director', or his principal clerk, of the T E S n a newspaper of general circu!a tined in ORS 193.010 and 193020, published at__ GR'� in the ' y p aforesaid count and state; that the ` '. PUB ;PUBLIC HEARING5 a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the }' entire issue of said newspaper'for. 0 N.E..�. _successive and • consecutive in the following issues: f JUNE 231 1988 ; i 7 • . x Subscri, .d and swo o before.rne this, June. 2 3 4 19 S a i ' 1 i : �. Notary Public for Oregon g My Commission 5xpirgw O-:88 AFFIDAVIT , I • 1 • • 1 y 1 • Jy • d�'Mr.- u, KpY _ S''I r r,'' A lal t'' 'f s�4�4 `w°I '^`. r �, .+. . , '} §, a.�,.7F 14., y t y �lP ra y1 f 1:�`I ∎4 ' , ;,c al • ' toes foitowink,�a\?rlt be,dOtrOiti tect'' y itbe; 4 Eea'r`in 1 61.11 r e � � ' �� ' � ' y W:eutie5da �'I t y 6,••�19$$,at%.100'1,.M�ti Tigard:Civic Cerrtet j'(,.�(;Tor` ..11.ai1,r L,, � i I J 2 L L' ' 7�. I '�• I �I l. 1312 . 1`�Hau;Blvd Trg4ro►Or"ogoii Both ilubiu oral bpd v rittob teptxnxoLrty ' ... . 1, ' ' ' is�til ite0 i`Tito,ptrb'1io lie-di il�g o`i tai1s mitteir Witt-:be doP"4tt t4 �,in ttedo » ' cdaiae wr>t 'ttti'e rf' es of`Chaist6r;°1S�32,rof tk&:t ga'd M iniafiid'f,C`8'de.'and i' ,. . i. 1 ale ,aac pl ocedLtres o a , oa'1rt s;iQt`t'�ce . aaz �nthr at rria obtai od;trod..'.the,P,)at�`i in t s`lon a .3125,5 ']Hall B J T gala,4regotl r. i, , , $23 �; traling.,�� g?+1' 1, �. ,� y A i{ 1.�J �� Ir 9 - r il'� Syr yt 'p� //W-��i I i (A i 1.,, .1 .,,•M A r i•SX' ,13 E1 OPM �T ` Vi .W.'s 1' ,1 l'',1I• - L�`1 '( D T{��1 y P �i[�} p ',V :'•.-.•,:i...,,':.,:',:... 1 i, 7 y f I - 1 t'T t�,l,,Vd:l lwAi\ J.'A7L,9�?02 ��, h �' ,��'I,r, ,,i i,.,, Re4oe$,t,by Puget Corj.nt;Qregoii to exrpatad,an e,isting�ind; trial bU11,�ng,- �° ' 1 ' ' .I I ' 1' ',by'20,000 S hr'e i t U>ni 'to 1Oaate;a'jt rtioa'bt a'.p4114.0g asd`d't r0*6S. l'' . ' ' 4 roa,Witbin+ the 100-year' food pion oh► VP (radnstr,i Purl)' 'Lo+catiori�l �� • ' '1,440','.$•W'0044,6 Road r( CT M ",;1'14AC.' .ax,L.ot 600 b e,,.$00) 0".0L'E,;;.Tins � r 4 v/. i >a can� earing:;t'egdriing�,ttils apCt�atrtizi� riIrcant' i �evrsrrr ,, . .r'..' th,a Site- r4 elo rnent ans 1"orrth ita p o' 1': tkiat.3a reliearzit 1s,t e t; r ►.',` ''` , . „ Rogbed,/b'f, im beve1oin extt tot subal isioti`prei1 Yiinary plat 1aptrov,tn1 to r . . i•Oliel a 1'5)R8,.a'x1e rnto one. ar e10f,a t'mkitriately 6 aol`es.Arid"�,35;, *i ele ' , ,' , • ) • I I n,frl` ire•vV le' `T d ii' �e L r' e n b,Q fl ;' '�[l 3d4 Ork n a O�d�U 911 e a «. r 7.. �es ui g 1s g � t ``•.(iajh1�,7 ui it f acre) .1-:,aoatioti:',1 E 5''S 13t1<t'Mtnp 1o4 ('v .TMf 1S19Aba,,,, `hx . V ) y ,r, ;',/i-,••,., i _ ,';',,,,,,''''••,::',,''','•'%' ''S tr 1 f .u.. „.l aNq.-ryYr}4.r . 4 f•f•rlryti.rr,�..wp. ..,i.h+, ,.5,.o�. a..l', ,. �,•1A r.l �, 'S„ ,.,. � . I I l I • • I • t- 1 • • vat 1, ( ' r.)c) n fic)„. ,, , _. 0. ■ --(:) '":41 . . St--" • i , .4, AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON County of Washington ) ss. r . City of Tigard I, , / S -being first duly sworn,. on oath depose . and say: Please P lit' That I an a t for The City of Tigard, ®re on That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC EEA&DW for: 1,1 ' That: I served NOTICE OF DECISION for • Cif of Tigard Planning Director Bard F1atn C©► iesiOn • , gaard 1IearLugs Officer � , , ,. • gated.City Council 4 1. � A, copy (Public Hearing Kotice/Netice of Decision) of oh is e att e d (eked ,� • Exhibit "A") was railed .to each iAased 1 persons at the tees shown on the attathed.list taaxked exhibit "h'' •on the day of 198 6 • . said �t ice NOT ICE O� 'O�CICICI� as b� �et o a t taehed e was posted oa au ! appropriate bulletin board on the ' ''•''. ,,4, dal' of . r er ' I9 ; . *tut deposited in the United States Mail On the,.,. day of '.1•. ,d,„,,,,-._.:-; a , .9 .,,,po to a prepaid o i « r signature PersoL4 Rhd 08ted Pm $u i letia Board For Deciaion Only)„.. , . 1„,, .., r ” ,,,\ .. , on ,t o deli reted to PoSTg.FICE i ' Su i boer. ed` and,sworn to b h r• . . r °,aka 4• .fir;''." u a "ti M i 1 �� NO PUBLI OF. OREGON n ' t4y Co iision Fry ireo e , ,• ' , 0t5TP/0021P r i a N w. I • N O T I C E O F PUBLIC HEARING , , , • • • • NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE CITY OF TIGARD'S HEARIN('a OFFICER, AT A, 1988, : • • MEETING ON „WEDNESDAY, JULY 6 r , ''AT 7.00' P.M. , IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BLVD. , TIGARD, OREGON, WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATIONS'' FILE NO. : SDR 88-12/SL 88-02 NPO # 5 FILE TITLE: PUGET CORP. OF OREGON APPLICANT: Puget. Corp. of Oregon 1 OWNER: Same 7440 SW Bonita Road Tigard, OR 97224 ■ REQUEST: To expand an existing industrial building by 20,000 square feet and to locate a portion of a parking and driveway area within the 1 00 year flood plain.ns � 8 ' ' LOCATION: 7440 SW Bonita Road (WCTM 251 12AC, T L 600, 700, 00) , (see location map on the reverse sided , THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATT ER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32. OF THE C!;MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF � ; PROCEDURE THE AT CITY HALL, ANY PERSON BY Y HAVING INTEREST IN THIS MATTER MAY!ATTEND AND AVAILABLE OR TESTIMONY MAY BE L SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO BE ENTERED THE BE HEARD, ENTERED� INTO �',�H� ��RECORD. � �� PLEASE CONTACT THE � '' PLANNING STAFF A`" 639 .4171 FOR FU INFORMATION. TIGARD CITY HALL IS I FURTHER j , y A AT 13125 � TIGARD, OREGON, 97223 OR c • LOCATED AT: � SW HALL BLVD. - PO A�D 5. YOUR NPO CHAIRPERSON CONTACT YOUR 1 , NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION (NPO) . N • Chairperson: Craig Hopkins Phon e Numb L: 639-5823 �__�__ 3... n IC e 74 n' • 4 4 w . r a 4 , oy;.. • ' \\\\`'�'` / .9.1,.., 1r , ■ wn,F 1\,• •,4. • LI vit.•••• 0. ' \ .. • _�.:.,i•.1, r .'T\ , Y Mx WA', I (' cTf, n F311. 't '" 1 k. ..,. i 1 v t 4 . \•,, s,. .—. {,,, 4•.•',J.....,......--,.....,,.••,..,,r2.,...".. ..d '-u , ,,..,,,,,,..,_t 9".'—' 1 . ,II .'" t • .1) L. • • • '• ' N \ r I � al I ) ~• "...9 p \;\ "E: j 9 w • �• I � \, .....--71-71,7 : r'17,..1 .i., .1 , 511 .1! „ I ip�f ' • • R' 1 , N r a !• ....,,,,,,,,,,•,:, ;. • .., -- p,o,..,- . , _ . ,, . ..,. ., ,., i: , . if,,,,..ip 1 . , 1 I J. .1 r� ,\ -; � ' � mi I II1?. Y.. ..� 1'_._..� .. _ 1I ' ,I' ^--\\ r t L I �.. i,l I I i •.., t ,. 1 , r trr ' 1{ V 1 1 I ��`, �+S,wltA Ignh �I I ti. ,,w, Ga.aw;fir, ' Or 1• a �: N 1 t \ � II it?".7 ( l_„ ' I ... •”'• h A II' i I '' t , `1 "\�" ,"S^� FAN/4./ l•t • 1'k^ 1-`'w ! a �j III i \\\ ; . -r k t■ n \` •I ,(* i ,J.L ( � q 1L� .. ��e ' ' 1 ` �'11 y 1^ j r • 714`" r 1- •r- ,wr fi•/ , ♦,� `I 1 �Yldt •\ I I`\I,` »"' + 1I . eft!t4fwxN1Y ks • \ 1 7.$;',,,,, ,4\4,1 ■\ ' I' ' 1 1 .■ ". YIiI`r 1 t + �y+!�.• I I" �'Y ,� r� r\ l7� 1„1, 1 I . ,.4 I + p �1 f 1 f p t I 1 �; 1 j y !1 ;t;itNe,1.rTa." , r I..•,. I I. Mlt I: I ; ( ' 't�t,, Ptrge:t ;,COrljotatiori I i• t,n wi ��', ' -1,��j i ■ 1�" I I 1(. ',1 1' -w J•" , il , . •: : . Jr�,t i �"i'• �l�L._ r "',. 1..�.. ( 1 f j I '�, �, 0 �c 4�n S to 1,...„ ,,„,..„.. ,, . .,,..., , iK .;.,I L«r 1 -,*' .~ } ! • f j I .. I,I� ",+r,✓ I. ^, r �r r .' II F, y i 1,I , l i "1 r,....h,I.,• .4.—'. a l 1 I: g , j..... - -,l•�..#\i,. 'x,111', i I , 1' ' ', le ��I tI I�t.,• I,ST xT� �, ,14,„' l ,I ',\ 1 i •, . {F 1 .t. �1:11.. -,,,\ f �,t 1 ••I ILO f i .• *- r j I µ I w ' ' ',A ■ 1 II .441 t':' ,rl 'l.Jti/ 1 F.,.a..I' �, I t «. ..11 "� T `' w i ', ' t ,l „ H !4.‘:.', ,t,1.,'1 1 1' -J' ry,' 1'p '"'+y �J ,� .,� II I 'ii , I, ",1 :.' ". . ....• % • . i' —''\'‘' l' 1.1 ". . . Il t: i '), , . ''41,1\'11 ;-...,\I., , . 'i . 1.. -$ R.,..7 . ,,,,,,...,. . k I 1 '�' 'I Q I . ti rk J 4154 4N j"1'I.1 + 1 !-1 !LK` "�' I +r 1 , (1 1 ' I Ill \1 4 +y I 1 t ; I l 1 ! ! •I� 1 R rt 4','s +t•, _4st• -',1• , . '"3i • ' /' 1 ).r ,,1 11''4 1 .1 LtI�II 1 4 ' . p`1t 1 a„. '• •• '+0••, :•k,j! .V �N I"U,IlIt�'r t1 I "�4i/`°I��.,�1 I .., i �'11 t I � , , .;, ., {0 ' I�(��-' Ili s+ r�Wl 1' 1,,1 L. I $j i� #/v �4 ,is,,,, ,. ,�I :-� 14 1L. 1 (I .I, ,� 1 N `r�-1 r I '..I a 1' r \ 11 , ' .1" '� ••) 11.+ •n �`;F R�,tli,rlrnrlCl '' rl1 '.l 1 ,.,,, �,:t..a.,.,+k{ y ,'' t ,.. � •A\'� { �+ t i j , r 4\ ., • r' ti 1 I. i 1 J 1 'II r ,• .,%4:111 ' '''''..4, i.: 4',,./ 4 ,' -•.. ,,4''' , , i 1 I '. '•. 1 ' 14-4 ,,,' • rtt1 +�. 1 / + , • .1 , , ' �' Y � 1 jl rY Ii ref sY��,• i� ' ,. �..�,,� 4 + � � a C1t 'I►�11 Y n'�n'AM�I „^ �� '--,f # r/y fi "Pi aki,icW I.,... 1', I..,. .. 1' • A M 1r- _- I. , r 1 • • 1300 Tennant investors - P.O. Box 1658 Portland, OR 97207 r 1+00 2 1 00 c Davi,, L.R. & Starkweather, R.M.RAM. Coeber, George & Jac4u ,lyn , & Ivan Starkweather Nelson, Gale & Ann Rt. 2, Box 474 K 7269 N. Adams Dr. Lacenter, WA 98629 Madras, OR 97741 1500 300 Brown, Milton Marcienne Terrace Assoc. 301 NW Murray Road P.O. Box 389 . , ' Portland, OR 97229 Palo Alto, CA 94302 w x_00 1600 L. Columbia Sunday School White, Norman Et Al & . 7455 SW Bonita Road John Haviland ' Tualatin, OR 97062 1900 Orbanco Bldg. Portland, OR 97204 1700 200 City of Tigard Coel to, George & Mildred ' . 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 14760 SW 76th and OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, 1800 William A. Monahan Warlick, Frank • R. Harrington 12290 SW Main St. '• 5575 SW Multnomah Blvd. 1 Tigard Or 97223 Portland, OR 97219 �.. 400 Puget Corporation of Oregon :"' ' National Safety Co. Geoff Levear By Harrington Ind. Plastics 7440 SW Bonita Rd, T ' Anaheim California 92801 Tigard Or 97223 4 ' 500 A-I Craig Hopkins Skourtes) John R. NPO #5 17010 SW Weir Road 7430 SW Varnes Beaverton, OR 97007 Tigard Or 97223 • 900 Roe der, George & J. Nelson � , 7269 N. Adams Dr. Madras, OR 9774 1000, 1100 , Mercer, D.E. Trustee - Austin, 'Neil, Trustee Jensen, Albert, Trustee 1 ;; • P.O. goy 10166 • Portland, OR 97210 ' , ' •u , C .. Gkn4fwd N+.,,w........� .... •_ � i wik.f . . . , i . . , . . . . ITYOF Its' �� .• a d,.•* �q,�, rtl� ,.. ... 13125 SIWI Hall'Blvd ,a.p;J z.� may. .net. .t.. �'rt 3�,k .1,,x,. fr. Box 23397 `.`v„; :, « F r 'lit , Tigard,Oregon 97223 c A ,l .. . �” ' 41.14 11'i4..d ''.,;'r,,T,/fjjy . �L1 V 1/4� A //I// a 1{A.Yh :i'�,;+%,«« ,.y �.A�t.p�:�a.{'I•, nt/�N/'JI [\ ^t",, M,G i �I"' 88M0/ f +" 1 ;i' R., Harrington Warlic , '� Blvd 55751, SW Multn� Cortland, OR 97119 • 1"1.t`il'e 75 2:202.15:1.1\1:1. ()9/02/(3 :--------.....,,..„, ,,, crrifoF TIVA.!: II ------,........„. . �.4 V w1"' a ,u"v t tafPnA Wf KS1:/Ja l„,,,..,--i—,10 //ma••y�( �t ., , - .4 13125 SW Hall Blvd. I *E F . a¢°, °”�..,�,F,,, , J , ; .:. PICA Box 23397 �9g'.i ,; 6�, .. 1`, ,, y _ , Tigard, Oregon 97223 !, �' ,"' r, � �� v� 16,x'. • Y 400 b Y`"� . • [,,,t t) V;t411 141111::,,,, I National Safety Co.' (j y By Harrington Ind. Plastics , , $, ..°:.;. Anaheim, Cali fornia 92801 . . qii''' . . S 7 � , .• , . .' ', ... � � .,,11, , , CITYOF TIARD ,,L,,,,a. .f r,, vi "� "' pry 13125 S,W, I-iall Blvd. • PO, Box 23397 . , � �a I , Tigard, Oregon 97223 ... ,,., lry‹,t,. 31 L 1 A. ,,.,, , 0,„-,,,,,,,, * 4:*<*l'10'<, \Ilia *rj 0 ••',.., li\3 : 1 c 600 '' i '1 r : ' 7L: Co luhbi a Sunday 5hoc , r CZ • 1� 7455 SW Bonita Road� 4 06 ` alatin OR 97 ,,, ' r I , i I ,s„.,,L,,,,t/c) '• , a . . ' T • ■ ■ . . CITYOF TIFARD• 13125"S,W, Hall Blvd ,,,,,„• r ∎,.,., M „ , ■e P,O Box 23397 ;' .; A;la:,.r.e,Jt:,�; 1" , Tigard, Oregon 97223 r �,�„, , �, p j �, } g �.,,,,,',,t, x r;,„,,„„li„,,,,,,,7 ft* ,,,,,,,,,,,,-^41,;,re41.444, viy i„,,,a,, tf '''' v 1800 «\\ 1 Warlick, 'Pr , R. Harrington ' S DR II 1 ..aL, 5575 S17 MultnOliiiah Blvd,. .."•/,' ;Portland, OR 97219 \::,,,,.. ''.--(4... WAR '75 220251 09/02/138 , � e' � _M f, .C.�ip.N1 .,,,,t:,Uw=l..04, ,,,,,4,.tv,:4,,,,..,.•:1, •a .U,, oraJN4 .A ,. • �,�d 13125 S.W HC11 Blvd , -o- ror+w•n n Iv n PO. Box 23397 P ,,E F 7igard,Oregon 97223 i /286 ,” *`N' ',;r. .x •" `'"" d,.. z 1 4 , 4 $�„u„',uaua,. 104 dui ttr.,,T� 400 4 ,' "' • r A ,, 'ational. Safety Co: e � By Harting tot), Ind. Plas tics 1 �� ' �, r: Anaheim; California 92801 i. , 13125 SYW.Hall Blvd; �'° ,� ^ { 1 � � j, M1 4:ft $1'r, 4 P ` Rx P.O, Box 23397 ��.` a J �" Tigard; Oregon 97223 �' ��, �:. a �%4! L. Columbia Sunday School 0 4,1 6/04, , N\c„..„?7 455 SW` Bonita Road '�ax "it 14 I• • Tualatin, OR 97062 . ' (y1`al, \1/4\L\.—Y) i. Marts I l' ■ f.' ■ . . ... «., .._.._ ., ..............:......w.•.h....w.,..++r. ...,...-,_.:f.,,J.. m .,.J,.... ...`4.,,,....•,«x.......,.;.......nw,.....ww..-..•.....«.,e n..r...«....4..nJ.,'..,.+...... .0.u.r L.. •....a. L;y.-J..«e..,w.d4.,.ti..-+..i..:,..:+... .4r.+.,�,.,.4..:..A;.I..w.: w.. ..,..._M.t,..._...--... ;�Ivf • • • r REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO: � M • SASE. a 10 1988' FROM: Tigard Planning Department • RE: SDR 88--12/SL 88-02 To expand an existing industrial building_b y 20,000 ' square feet and to locate a portion of a parking and driveway area . within the 100 year flood plain. 7440 SW Bonita Rd. (GCTM 251 12AC TTY 600, 700, 800) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for " your review. From . . information supplied b' Y various departments ar i agencies and from other information available to our staff, a i report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by May 20 , 19 88 e You may use the space provided , below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with rgour comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible If you u have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning 1. Department, P.O Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. Phone: 639-4171. Keith Liden STAFF CONTACT: ,•. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it Please contact of our office. f 3 , Please refer to the enclosed letter. Comments: ' • ., , Written • Name of Person Commentiti • • Phone No. • ca/3521P r. • " v , . ...... .,......... -.- _.. —...._,......,.....- .._,... . .., ,...,.._.r. i ., a ...,, W. ._..r.IL.....+n. ._ . L n.,... .,t...,....a., .ry,s. r.,ixt..r ,...n. «.... .r y: � :, NOTIFICATION LIST FOR ALL APPLICATIONS x ar 1. N• PO No. $ CPO No. 2, CITY DEPARTMENTS B• uilding Inspector/Brad R. t/ Parks & Recreation Board/Curtis S. j ' City Recorder Police , Engineering/Gary A. Other 0.. : 3. SPECIAL, DISTRICTS , +. VFire District School Dish No. 48 (Beaverton) (pick-up box bldg.) Joy Pahl PQ Box 200 • V T• igard W.J. Beaverton, OR 97075 - 8841 SW Commercial School Dist. No. 23J (Tigard) Tigard, OR. 97223 13137 SW Pacific Hwy. Tigard, OR 97223 __ Metzger W.D. _�__.a Other 4. AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS Wash. Co. Land Use & Transp. Boundary Commission ' ' 150 N. First Ave. 320 SW Stark Room 530 ;. Hillsboro, OR 97124 Hillsboro, OR 97124 Brent Curtis ._ —" Kevin Martin METRO Paula Calvin 2000 SW 1st Ave. Port1, nd, OR 97201-5398 City of Beaverton % Jim Hendryx PO Box 4755 - 4755 SW Griffith Beaverton, OR 97076 State Highway Division Other - ,, Lee Gunderson PO Box 565 ! . Beaverton,, OR 97075 7. SPECIAL AGENCIES 'l' ' I Gen Telephone ... Iortland O ..neral Elecr.ri.c General Te1e .one e Ed Wilmott Jim Johtson 12460 Ski Main Portland General Electric Tigard, OR 97223 14655 SW Old Scholia perry Beaverton, OR 97007 , Northwest Natural Gas Metropolitan Area Communication Ronald D Q Polvi PE; P'LS Twin Oaks Technology Center h 220 NW Second Ave. 1815 NW 169th Place, ,8 60`20 Povtland, OR 97209 Beaverton, OR 97006-4886 b. Pacific Northwest tell . oth er (0257P/0021P) ' (R-3/,87 '1' .N..l..+.—....A+. ...An4.�.JU.m.-.��iJ.•a.J..:�.4.w.a...w..,-t..+«...... ..•k«mil JIM I..t•.IV...�.,...�..�e.a.�.,Min.H.•..,..-..� +I.I�.�.A-.. .i�a..e .._.,..v.......W.�.�i1...�w.•�..-•:11....w..m....,.....w..Y...•.4wn ...h�..wa..r,ry x'..._ n•...-,..v....r..•-... .,.w • 5. STATE AGENCIES • Aeronautics Div. (ODOT) DOG�Y�Mx Engineer Division of State Lands Board of Health Commerce Dept. M.H. Park Fish & W3.1 d'i ife • Parks & Recrea, Div. (ODOT) LCDC Subdivision Supervisor P1YC Dept. of Energy Fire Marshall .� fM • Dept. of Environ. Quality Other _r_._ 6. FEDERAL AGENCIES' • ..n w Corps of Engineers Other • Post Office 025 /0021P # . • 1 . j • • ■ i 1 l ■ 1 r 1 ^ ( In .a 1 r • • • • 5,,D f38 z Surrround.ing Properties Owner List Tax map TAX LOT NAME `AND ADDRESS 2S 1 12AB 1300 Tennant Investors P.O. Box :658 Portlana . Oregon 97207 2S 1 12AB 1400 Davis, L.R. and Starkweather, R.M. and. Ivan Starkweather Rt. 2, Box :.474 Lacenter, Washington 98629 2S 1 12AB 1,500 Brown, Milton'', 0. . . 301 N.W. Murray Road cf. Portland, Oregon 97229 2S 1 12AB 1600 L. Columbia Sunday School 7455 S.W. Bonita. Road Tualatin Oregon 97062 2S 1 12AB 1700 City of Tigard • • 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 972231; 2S 1 12AB 1800 Warlick, Prank and Harrington, Robert F. • 5575 S.W. Multnomah Blvd, r � , Portland, Oregon 97219 • 25 1 12AC 400 National Safety CO. By Harrington Ind. Plastics , Anaheim, California 92801 n , A 25 I 12AC 500 .A-1 Sknurtes, John R. 17010 S.W. Weir Road Beaverton, Oregon 97007 I 2S 1 12AC 900 I oeber, George R. and Jacquelyn P. N21son, Gale A. and Ann Nl, 7265 N. Adams Dr. Madras Oregon 9,1774 . 25 1 124C 1000 Mercer, D.B. Trustee 1, Austin Neil A. , Trustee Jens Jr. , Jensen, Albert Trustee P.O. Box 10166 Por-- . , �and, Oregon 97210 �, 25 1 12AC 1100 Mercer,' D.E. , Trustee e I Austin, Neil A. , Trustee Alberf P. d`r. , Trustee P.O. Bow 10166 ! Portland, Oregon re 'on 97210 , ' •nr. e i • �...,Vti...,e;:alw.�-�W.,.u,i...+,i. ... �- ,,� .;lo.n..-,..I.«±.�.r�.,..,.�1y1".w-.—»..».. •re......�.,.'.a....L+,n.,L-_.,,..,u.,_.-.. ...,u...,,-I.... �„d»w--,.:,c,_.,u.Mw.,AN:.aA�A::.�ad,taww�i.,-�w,.,,.,....,�1, .-w4.»,'�' :.�.''1::�. .M^^,.n:.�;:�:•.T.�,+.,•,.,4+,.,,.:..e,...4�._.uµx*.a,w,,....,,,,...,U ,-.,,. , i 25 1 12AC I 1200 Koeber, George R. and Jacquelyn P. Nelson, Gale A. and Ann M. 7269 N Adams Dry Madras, Oregon 97741 1 , , 25 1 12BA 300 Marcienne Terrace Associates P.O. Box 389 Palo Alto, California 94302 Norman Et Al and 1 00 White, N 2B D , 2S' 1. 12BD elt Haviland, John . 1900 Orhanco Building 1001 S.v�i: 5th , Portland, Oregon 97204 — 25 1 12BD 200 Coello, George J. and Mildred M. 14760 S.W. 76th Tigard, Oregon 97223' 0 ,ii,, '� • . f • 1 E • I 1 , i I 1 p ( I i ti 1 I r e , I I i : - - - - - - - is --- - _-- - -- --._ _ - - -- - - r: . '11 '''1.17f oF TiotTRE) _ , _ . : . 13125 S.W._Hall Blvd. �,� _ , _ , . P4C3:Box 23397 447&,_,4t)„ Tigard,Oregon 97223 .1 . f t 4.1€x, 1 60O �.L. columbia S day School 7455 SEA► Bonita Road { Tualatin, OR 97062: - Sit.....--' _ 1 3 - - - - - - - - - - - __ _ - - - - - _ -- - - - - ^ - - _ .ice ..,,,,. �s - -- __- , - r T- li- • cirioF TIF,,ifiliti): : - 43125 SiN Hall Blvd. _ .__, ,_ . . ,. . : ..„-- P.O Box 23397- Tigard,Oregon 97223 400 : / - National Safety 1J Y `� Ey_Harr gtoa Ind.. Plastics - _ - rinaheim,. Ca 1 i fornia 92801 t. r } t • = R: ._ '.."- 't-;1;:i ...", - =. t- - , .., .__ - 13125 S.W.Hall Blvd. ,� ,'` c? °°' arirOF TWARD , ..., P 0 Box 23397_ ¢. _ Tigard,Oregon 97223 . .,£, _ _ C; 1800 - 1�r_lick,- Frank& R. Harrington rt 5575 SW Multnomah Blvd.vd, 1 Portland,. OR 97219 _ c-* •\\ ,,A ,,- t\)\ 1 ,- %Yilliiir,----- - . \ ,\111 i ,...._/15 _,.. , 46, *44. .4'''''.--X . \ i T .' f,4 `- .&_-•ti) 1C.:;704„,, *--, t 1 ‘ i \_IfC) A..../ -k71- ‘.%'1-')'-, c41 IN *1--,' \\ / \--.\'\°\'‘f‘l -414_-3- -�. I 1 - 1YOFT14RD , J• _ 13125 SW Hall Blvo. - RO.aox 23397 = St.F 1. Tigard,Oregon 97223 �. z i., _ _._ -,,,N\viD i..„ ,._ .. 11, 0 0 4 s, f � # ` L. Columbia Sunday Sc of = 7455 SW Bonita Road = F _ `ualatin gl 9706 ? T 4a■ S L. F. f IYiT . u • F i 1 e }'f• 4•'"' e?.- Z.-`� s' Fi..i' 'GJ ./V• _-- Applioant: el G� 1� f,r • ( Location: 7G? G6) 2e., ., • • . Decision Date: fil, /OP/ 1 1 I 1 I CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL T4 BE FULFILLED • 1 Prior to / ig bate z• rr --z-� �..__.__ .. 1. / / 1 cite, 4,,,,,,, 11 4, ,0 1 . 2.1 -,,,e,e,' ie/A.) , -7 - ap-e--- „,: ,,,A ' /LA/q()) C• 3. e�- - - y / / . G 1 • 1. It.. /4("1,66/ ,,e64?I''''1 .•P' '-''''''' t (,,,, 5. ,..."'1-/(j-(// I C • y i let", /0 ,.,..„,2,„,./ I, +' 1 . , , / 1 4 . °..- / / w 4e , ,,,,,,.,,e,,ezd, fl C/U;1",1"-i 'e-,a(4 -."1"‘''''' . i a3 7 P r . 1 1 7 7 64- 1-1,e-ed,er 6(2,-, 1 i, • . . I I • I I J11 1 .i li , " III • r � ,, F i le rs; - 1 .- 1,S 61..- 1 e-tea i.. Applicant; 667 r. 16,t: l,oc.: t;idirt 47111'u 0bvA Doi:i s ion Date .... . . ._ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO R8 FULFILLED l', P r i o r t o ' �' ee IL,'C' Contact S ir-•Of f pates A.,,y,, kt, -'5.1-12.414.,,1: f _.. e,A -_ i /. ' 4,11 4/Z, T-C41.-) '1X-'•40'. -.7 4111 ___45 _ _,___,. . / /1, , . . d,,A. fLaLit)LATC.,/147C-14.7..T.E. 001V:ti.\r'-'2.-0 41)11144C:-OA‘) . 1-.' A It.- 4.//litq ' . A4d, eitnlise0U,A OM W t'T VI 404 J2s.114--- lit-- .4/ /5/0 ,. 6.$.1?-00(r1/4.01. +A1 s,)Abe, lc,) __ �r." ---- . / / ii, * 6,,,,7',TUS. ‘Nei", 4PL.A1,) k?ViZak,/AL AOT) #Siotkiv, ___ezA. (.',..,..4....- /_J.__ 4,-,..e., A.0, a d , "$'* ( , Ivo 0 1.:, F"'L 1 L.Aivi —tt ,(LA t O ,-AMC o ' 1 ia3527P j ii ' 111.--- (A"- 4 Pi/it , A.L . Vc �: ;, ..4Aro 1 L / IL r. a ' " ' , (56a , ' , ,' -' (4....„ , r � I 4 I f. Five (5) sets of plan and profile public plans and one (1) itemized improvement construction Ia � construction cost estimate, stamped by a Registered Professional , Civil Engineer, detailing all proposed public improvements shall be , ubmitte d to the Engineering Section for. approval. _ Two (2 ) � sets of plan and profil e plans shall be submitted f o r preliminary review prior to submittal of final plans. g. Construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering section has approved ■ public improvement plans. The section will require a 100% a performance assurance or letter of commitment, with payment of a a permit fee and a sign installation/streetlight fee. Also, the execution of a street opening pert or construction compliance agreement shall occur prior to or concurrently e issuance prior rentl�r with ��.x�c e . of approved public improvement plans. h. A revised site and landscaping plan shall be submitted for Planning Director approval which includes the following items: (1) The parallel parking spaces ces near 74th Avenue shall have Minimum dimensions of 8.5 feet by 20 feet. The northern �, g ``�, : � �2� '�h fern drive�aa�r in the new parking awes shall be otttitted. (3 ) Specific species and size of landscaping materials shall be identified. 4 : (4) specific plans illustrating hoW the two tr ees located in the southern parking lot will be save eft as indicated. I Y (5) Two handicapped icapped p arkin g spaces within easy access to b uild ing entrances. . n i.....'....:.r A,.3.' ...,...................«. ,.,._ . t..,........,..- a..At +. ....'w, t, ., . i...«,.'lt......:1..,A...«.0-._»l N...:......i.... i. The 100 year floodplain shall be dedicated to the public from Bonita Road to the south property boundary. The dedication documents shall be on forms approvedppxaved by the City,. �._� and shall be recorded with Washington County. 2. Al]. items noted in . condition 1 (h) above shall be installed prior to occupancy of the new 20, 000` squar'6 foot addition. 3. This approval iS valid if exercised within one year of the final decision date. 4. The air conditioning unit and any other outdoor mechaniaal equipment shall p comply with applicable DEQ noise standards. DATED . �'1 thls ..., day y o f July,.J HE NG BET ¶4 SO ♦ i it I. I, i • h $r ' rs d a a • • r '�• r ./ x�`n ,•a Y {, `, 13125 S.W. HALL BLVD. , X 23397 OOEFG.TI I :Tl�A� J �� 97223 r OREGON c. • TO: I FROM: ,-/ w. 1 I (.... — .......................... (7,-7.7,7777,77,77,777-7,77,:. � r, 1•�,'y , ,r',� , �/y[y�.,�y!y.�.,; a(�+.��y�r...t «r . � I t r�,y �.,,a M,wt, i IEo.JSA7+'�i7... ," �, +{, °'r•.' ii'y lA 1'2 f, , ,Stx t�� O — , k -: - I 1• I p, „rt .t.,;,,,,,,,,., G a r • r er&th2 �]1rd��'i�'�((��' M•kri� � yYM_ r.*+'V '��WY.� yx'"y. y.N �4 � .,y �q�e��J, , r �Id` 1., ��()p(�y '.r... ,1 .!::f �d l ,Y "!V'), 4r' ' {`[,,,,.;21 0i7'l+i! i, ir�r' L {.-.'�'L- --=-- i , •-)L.R."„E.'•u+ri+' I . .' M • r f '. ' ,r wtµ • •�'. `W rr Y 4,/y,N4,1 M4 , .„ c-�,.W f i � j/f,. . ( l' d �'I'./ .j`✓,,,,,, „,"F"(4� 1,,A.....1_3,,,^ _ �(,,,.)(/tr /1 !c(( .M+n.w..w�rn+.r•n..l:.:rr�lMCw�.. .I1�.�• 311•a. • .,. /T ! .J IL.'" 1 W �..{rrll .,. 4?, 1 • 4 r ✓ �2+ou W r ` 1,,,11-..r a�w ' e� v� a ` la �w-"\ t t.,..)'-'1i)'''' f. ''�rr— ' C.1 . N Y •��.w ar a • � iii (0, (2-c+ X'wa '{G y �h f xJ �.,`� /,,.)4:;,!, 4 Iserva —A,06 ) I A. I '1 ( I 4,,, ______, ' I� [YI.� +MM Aillt� lw+rr __=.�•�-.T4.+..••wl.r.r111•. "'•� •��1��r �0�,,'�'."�.• 1l i �y:7,,'�.f� y - .. .•. h /iy^�^',,. 1 I•uI�"1w'1 f,�� y.R�.rA` • !A 1 I 1 ..., F1,1 - I d.-OP:cr, Vii' ` , :: 1 to . ' Al I.J a''1• v'r..: !y y,.M .. 1"'M+'1 r Mr,'.-'u�"�I M+,� r4'• � 4 7.1 r I, H t:•.'"'� i,,J P' , �.,„,,....,.__, ,,.,,...., f I I I I . SI N ,D ';',:, ', ;.;,\,,:4. , ..;'e...4'.. -,,,,--..-,,,,,......,,-..,-,,,,-,L,„,„.'.....,.4,,, ,, ,;.,, ,,......_, ..,.,..,....,,,,,,, ,'., ' ',L)A[t:L. -- .. '' ''., ' . .,; %.4.,,,,,J I ' j,RE.Pir,T2I.Z31.21C-':.-'7, t:e /..115"7"1-1!12.5' 1,41.d.r. ,tiOtJ4-2j:;r__:_'I0;L..__ _Iq'r"r_._L.,u___Lf.2____<1 61,1 6-.:',.,— ' / I I I i l'I • r.{ i'. • PLEASE PETUPN ORIGINAL COPY WITH F EP LY, KE50 PINK COPY FOR YOLJI YOU RRECC Pb8a , tr,wrl x AIL COPY W.,....' � �., . . .�„�.... i s„I .r..a.c.,.. .,.,_.o ,.s.,. _,. _.w. , �-W�.*•r>rarhr Fer..,{�. ' N r y A > L '1 1, 'I A I • • ( Harris-McMonagic Assoctatcs, Inc. ENG1NEERS-SURVEYORS 12555 S.W.HALL BLVD. TIGARD,OREGON 97223-6287 Thlephone(503)639-3453 . Date: May 22, 1989 , Project: Puget Corporation , Subject: Legal Description for a 5 foot wide strip of land to be dedicated to the publiC for additioral right of way to be added to S.W. 74th Ave. The following described strip of land being situated in the 0 Northeast 1/4 of Section 12 , Township 2S, Range 1W, W.M. City of. ' Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, Being more particularly described as follows : Beginning at a point of intersection of the Sout'i line as described in deed to Puget Die Casting Company in deed bock 759 page 22 and the Westerly curved right of way line of S,W. 74th Ave. 20 feet from the centerline thereof, said point being located from the N.W. corner of lot 20 Fanno Creek Acre Tracts , N-00'03'27"-E 345. 95 feet along the center of section line of section 12, &nd parallel with the North line of Section 12, N-89°46' 45"-E 379.48 feet to the "TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING" ; Thence along the arc of a 1889.86 foot radius - curve to the right having a central angle of 02°33'30" the chord of which bears S-03°48' 03"-E 84 .38 feet (the arc distance of 84 . 39 feet being to the left of the chord) , to the terminus of this curve, being non-tangent; Thence S-03°53'42"-E 5 ,34 feet; Thence along the , arc of a 163.20 foot radius non-tangent curve to the left having a• central angle of 312100" the chord of which bears S-19638 `50 -E ' • 88, 19 feet ( the arc distance of 89.30 feet being to the right of the chord ) to the terminus of the non-tangent curve; Thence S-34°56' 12"-E 0 . 91 feet, Thence along the arc of a 141 , 40 foot radius non-tangent curve to -:.he right having a cEintral angle of A 33°12' 00" the chord of which bears S-18"43106"-E 80 .79 feet (the arc • distance of 81 . 93 feet being to the left of the chord) ; Thence • -0_ 0 02 0 07 07 E 17.68 feet to the North line as described in deed to BE Torpen, et ux, by deed recorded March S 1946 in deed book 255 , page 781 ; Thence along last said line 8-89°4645"-W 5. 00 feet; Thence N-02°07 ' 07"-W 17,51 feet to a point of curve; Thence along the arc of a 136. 40 foot radius curve to the left having a central angle of 3W'1200" the chord of which bears N-18'43'06"-W 77. 94 feet ( the arc distance of 79, 04 feet being to the right of the chord ) ; Thence N-3465612 -W 0 .91 feet; Thence along thE arc of a 168.20 foot radius non-tangent curve to the right having a central angle of 31°21 ' 00" the chord of which bears N-19638'50 -W 90,89 feet ( the arc distance of 92. 08 feet being to the left of the chord ) ; Thence N-03°52` 42"-W 5.47 feet; The-ice along the arc of a 1884 . 86 foot ,, • radiUg curve to the left havng a central angle of 02°3416" the r chord of which bears N-03"43'27"-W 84.57 feet ( the arc distance of 84.58 feet being to the righ: of the chord ) ; Thence N-89'4645"-8 5. 02 feet to the True Point 'if Seginfting0 Conta1nin,7: 1397.70 square .Peet, or• 0 • • ■ • • • r. y .. . .-ma,...,...... .i._ ,_ ,,,,,..,_-u,,..._..........._,,...•,.,.,.......,...,,,µF,.,......er..,.,.....«,__,..,...,,+,._.r ............a._•:.=, ,..n.....: .•.....,.„,„,,,,....'4.,...,_.,,-;.-..1...,-,...,,,,-,,,.,...,•••,..,,,, s,•,,,..,,.i..-,..n-l.,,,». + •,,•„,••..,L,,..,•::,...,1,..,,,,,..,....e.5�«+:. .5�4"a 1r1ra.....e.., m.-.,..........4-4.4.w•.w,w.,... ' • , '4 • • • • • I ctBr'r hA* II I P.0.61.FLOQU PIhIH LtlAI.UFSCRIFIIOIV S,W, D(5N11A R , D ' 56,34 —._......_._.., I ``....,s,74 Gj I I ,3 t,J CA (4. • I ' I , I • S FLOOD PLAIN • . I I � g 5.3.4 5.47 • Y I II' �y � a z . • .. , FLboD CaLAIN » EA 7o F3C C)B�DEq u'v, a,ni . S E:IN OF VDARD -0 Ft)R C REL'NWAY i• »� a' u+ g ii 4✓ r 1 14(2,50 UQ�,N 6 a 1,1 i'` 4 _ S O0'4645W • I I I I I I l r I I I I I I 1 ,.....,N„..,.,..,...,•............ .....u,.m,a....,�:xl. r_.a..., .....:....a ...i,,...,_..,..........,.,.., w.,w,w....au ,,,._.., .,.......,.......,_,......,.,....,.i,x„biH:�_,,,U...-.....,w +w..+-..-,...,..,-..,. .._.,....:,u..•...,._.- ..,..w • d • Harris-McMonagle Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS 12555 S,:.HALL B'L'VD. TIGAIU),OREGON 97223-6287 Telephone(503)639-3453 • DECEMBER 6, 1988 LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT "A►' • SUBJECT FLOOD PLAIN DEDICATIO1 FOR OREENWAY FROM: PUGET CORPORATION OF OREGON ' TO: CITY OF TIGARD . THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND, BEING A PORTION OF THAT TRACT OF LAND IN DEED TO PUGET DIL CASTING CO. AS RECORDED IN DEED BOOK 759 PAGE 22, AND SITUATED IN THE N.E. 1/4 OF SV WTION 12, TOWNSHIP 25, RANGE 1W, WM. CITY OF '4'IGARD, W ASHINGTON CDUNT? OREGON BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SW, BONITA ' ROAD, ( C. P . 736 ) AS ESTABLISHED IN C.S. 20387, SAID POINT LOCATED FROM A BRASS CAP MARKING THE NORTH 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 12, AND , BEING S-00'08'27"—W 1349. 18 FEET ALONG THE NORTH—SOUTH CENTER OF SECTION DIVISION LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING ON THE SOUTH LINE OF S,W, BONITA ROAD, ( 30 FEET, AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE CENTER LINE . , THEREOF ) ; THENCE N-89°17 ' 05"--E 56.34 FEET ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE TO THE FANNO CREEK 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN LINE AT AN ELEVATION OF 135. 00 FEET ABOVE SEA LEVEL; THENCE FOLLOWING SAID FLOOD PLAIN LINE TM S-04319 ' 11''--L1 5 , 74 FEET; THENCE S-34°23 ' 02"—W 2.5. 93 FEET; THENCE , 8-26p12 '24"—W 27. 80 FEET; THENCE 8-18'52 '22"—W X2. 0 7 FEET; THENCE n 8-07618 ' 16—W 26.38 FEET; THENCE S—02'15 '55"—8 47.41 FEET; THENCE ° S-00°16 '23"—E 42 . 90; THENCE 5-07'50 ' 41"—W 16.7t FEET; THENCE S-54'29' 01"—W 8 . 00 FEET; THENCE 5-18'27 '20"—W 11:90 FEET; THENCE . • S-04°30 ' 32"-E 18, 97 FEET; T4E NCE S-04'45 ' 17"—W 23.43 FEET; THENCE S 44°12 ' 19 1 —E 18, 43 FEET; 7 IENCE S w 34°1 3 ' 2 3' -E 17.79 FEET; THENCE 5-60'27' 02"—E 10 . 82 FEET; TIENCE S-76'24' 17"—E 11 ,06 FEET; THENCE S-79°50 '40"—E 23, 12 FEET; /IENCE S-84'18 '52"—E 68.27 FEET; THENCE 8-87'06 '27"—E 30, 05 FEET; THENCE 8-64'41 '39"—E 20,86 FEET THENCE j. 5-16°49420"—E 26. 87 FEE T, THENCE 8-11'52' 05"—E-E 28.55 FEET; THENCE 5-38°52'37 r E 3 4.4� FEET; THENCE 8-10°25 '26"—E 211.5 } ' FEET; THENCE PARALLEL � �S��8 FEET LINE TO �PAS DESCRIBED NE 1 F.� �� 8-27°20 '33"—g O POINT ON A LINE 67 80 SOUTH OF Am) LEL WITH THE SOUTH IN D'E'ED BOON 789 ,�PAGE 22; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE S-89 '46' 45"—W 240 , 50 FEET TO THE NORTH—SOUTH E,. CENTER OF SECTION DIVISION LINE xl��RiOUG:-1 ;�ECTIC+I�� 1:2; � THENCE N O0°08 '27�'_E 455, 49 FEET T ) THE POINT OF BEGINNING .CONTAINING: 0 , 82 ACRES. I i $J i I • • a,+,,.,...»._...M{. „«w ,.,.......,1--..,-..—.,,»..•...,..-«,.._•,_...__..,...,»..M-.,,,,,, .............._4,.•.•...:,in...,..,,._N,..,•.-..«..,. .,.,.»G.».,.,,,,,,,,,444»._..1',4,-,.,,1...m. _......._»,.,,..,,-._...........,.t.n..,...,.-.....»-..•4..,...,,.1.,„-.,...,,...,...:..u,.,,.»-,,,_,........i-,.,-,;.a...4.....,..,...M..,4:4..,..w.. ..,,......«..,«,,._,,.. ....+4w....._.,,,..,i • . i , A tam' MA ilsi, , . / a P,0.0.FL000 PIJJW . . • Lac oastmrr�ora S W, 8ONITA RO. 1 63 ✓... } O'1.` } , N 1 A ` F, a. r.r 5.02 g 0 .i�"_ . , '1 FLOOD PLAIN • V S '\I.,LOt1 1 u "�7 5, t P • i I7. / 233 pi4—..•.., .... s 7✓ z RDA t7EGICaT1 FLOOD 'PLAIN �, AFiCATO �>= aEDCe N TO CIT1' OF '11GARRC� r i te.`-'''' FOR GRCED'WAY. w,� L -• rn w 4, w N 'n, 'r. 4 , s c te'. r • f 444444444444444440444.44444.44m H-MCASSOCW, INC. ,SUN m 1989 ,12 4/84 m r, , n t �D oPincet Project: Puget Corporation Description Sub j cct: Legal Y F Five-foot wide right-of-way dedication along g S.W. Bonita Road and S. W. 74th Avenue . feet width i n the ',northeast 1 4 of Section 12, T-2S A strip of land 5 00 fe t 1 n I R-1 W, W.11. , City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon. Being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at t h A so southwest corner of that tract t of land in deed to Puget'et Die Casting Comp , y ecorded in Book 759, Page 22, Deed Records, Washington. County, . . Oregon; thenc "f-00°08'27"-E 192.74 feet along the West line of said Puget tract , to a point 25.00 feet southerly of, when measured at right angles to, the center- line of S.W. ,Bonita Road as established by County Survey 20,387 and-the TRUE s POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; thence N-89'0'05"--E 351 .55 feet parallel with said centerline to a point on the West right-of-way lire of S. W. 74th Avenue; I ; being 20.00 feet westerly of, when measured at right angles ,.v,;.v, the centerline of said S. W. 74th Avenue; thence following said West right-of-way line ail ong the arc '' of a 1 ,889.86 foot radius curve with a central angle of 05°59'35''; the chord of which bears S-07°59'36"-E 197.58 feet, the arc distance of 197.67 be i q to the left of the chord; thence 5-89°45'45"-rW 5.02 feet; thence along the arc of a 1884.86 feet 'radius curve with a central angle of 05°24'52" the chord of which bears N-07°43'00'`-W 178.05 feet the arc d•lstance of '178,12 Feet being to the right of the chord; thence along the arc of a 17.00 foot radius curve with a cen- � � ,tral angle of 80'36'26" the chord of which bears N-50'24'44"-W 21 .99 feet, the , arc distance of 23.92 feet being to the right of the chord; thence S-89'17'05"-W uk 333:17 feet to a point on the West line of said Puget Die Casting tract; thence N-00°08'27"-E 5.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. r - N i lF a . � � �a _ •,. A48.?-;,7'0:A.--A--- _ -bt _ • .- _ �eslrT�l/ 'll/0/ �'� !illr/r t s s� '` 3 9 . i t f �. i i . ._: Z I f . k . /2- 6) .- --7- .47./. "--- -•.',,,,,.5*.?"-://vc; c-4 7, 7-,c R -7-• -4 9.-k ‘Ni . ir_ 040,, \..144. 11 N , 3420: 7 P:4 2-.2. • 14 -!-1 \k i 1 i - X /ii.„.17...ce f _ .r0�W , N" ' ..s . i _-o a-5-?t,3-" - i149a°tea96 /p . Ii r. I z _ _ _ _ - 1;1_:--- i :. -.- :: 1 -- . - - - 1/' :141:-/ "‘"''''4:--:,r ‘--0,1;700c, ..57":eq'zt-1-7- -- l'ziti°694494'7'; 22Z-42/C4P7-767,-1/- - • - ,,eie='„Z,oc/1/1 - ._ . ._._ _ _ _ _I . : x _ , .. b, , • • i 1 i, ; ■ ■ ■ • . .4. . . ' ' ' ' '.1.41.. ' ' ' 1 4P Q' r . r 1: /q er.,,r, ..., r .. , „a � r .. . 4,,,,,,,4,4 . • ,?-04;,,, , ' 0#4.ei6 ,,irei..efi, ..",elea,Ape,4 ...' . rte. � �� -� ��r� „.�,.��-•- ,�. ..„........„,., . .♦ • 4 v Rot,'•41,0a r n'n.,�f,IrF ✓`+^�+'^/'.,�^'+'...4 ,y ' _ 1IL- • - ..46, .. .,... . . . . . „ . \.I 'f• 9 , . , !t ' r • ,., x.r rr...14r .xn w r... •,w ,« , n...„ r, n .•,• - .,...-. • r I • i � tt. ■ ' ..,, ,4,-----.,,-,. .„,•-,rr.... Yr..v.., l.y,..,w.-« .r...rr.... -rM ,r.....a..,...A+_.......M.. ,,,, ...,.,,•J r.', . .•.'-,,l ...4.-....,..Ir J.,«....n-..__,,,,,,1_,.,_,l..rr. , ,• ......r w a..,rl—r..,...,,,,r, ..,.,,,,-+i,,,,,,,---4.. r—.....:.4...,,.-..,,--,—_—-.(,•: d , }+. ,••I y H'n F i w,r y„ ',as��:p�y,ircT I 1 .,.b,•. ,r,-1,---7-.- J, Iy„ti� n-, Ir row,• 4..' ki ,,- j r 1 ,,,.',,,,ft,, E J SAP a ,;:'':.' ' ,\'f' '1 I 2 3 • LA k . t 5 F wyxw��t,. ,. . N' y Y i j,'i i I;,• CITY OF TIGARD . F Sabro PLANNING DEPTH �. ConstrLc.�t�on ,. . • • .... . ... :, -.. C o `/ September 23, 1988 , • i . . T ', Mr. Keith Liden, Sr. SR Planner 1, • : City of Tigard . . P.O. Box 23397 Iq. ' •'•' Tigard, OR 97223 ;, `. .' . r Re: Puget Corporation 1 : , Site 7440 SW Bonita Rd. ` . ',fir Dear Mr. Liden As you are aware, we have recently begun construction at 7440 S. W w. Bonita Road in Tigard, OR. In the process of clearing the blackberries . , and associated brush, we have discovered the embankment to Fanno ' Creek is considerable further away from the proposed asphalt parking • area than was indicated on the early topographic drawing. This is particularly true in the area indicated on the attached drawing. f, Since this is the case, and Puget does need the additional space to effectively maneuver trucks in and out of the loading dock, Puget Corporation desires to enlarge the parking area by the amount shown . on the drawing. .1 ' We anticipate turning the parking areas over to the asphalt contractor for rock and paving the first week of October. I" We would appreciate your response at your earliest convenience. i - Sincerely, SABRE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ie_,,,----..,-- -...,..:::j1.0...,...z;-•:1„....„.„,,,, / r 1 j To, 47"---"-- 1 /.15 , -rt-i , _ - uss lcBlro IVI; a i t.,...,1 MEI Art COD r�C' I Project Man•ager .;., ran • �.�``,� •.'� Wll.t, CZETUI2IV�L7. IN? PHONED �, pL�AS oa I 0 YC�UCx C,� re,5Fi� 0 WAS14 ( unto rat C� ;�L AGAIN CALI, YOU , ____„ .._-?.-. .)q-__-___m+ ,e4f.: c ca.,:x_■,..--1,%.txzt.:. P , . i _ ... .. - ---.6. , .. .,.:.i..r.. ...�, �( "- I `. , ". 6712 N�Cutler Circle + PO Box 452/ ' Portland,uregon Y/Ai w "Te∎ephor 0 b[13:.2-6.!3-41444 '� r - F#� fit' ..r.i. i.�,,_.. ..,r, ,.,,i ..., ...,,,. .. „�,,... �,,..,,.i,., �,. ..r.I., r,..,..r ,,.•... r..r .. ..,. .,i�„ .,. r„m...,. .. wt , n , 4� r- • , • -1L , 'N Yr"Y�"I'f7'y-y 'it^I�° t ' a IR:,,,AtNYtuj,w.. l,' . . f ,.. ,. ., ,I „ S EP 2 1988 • ,, ,,,,,,f,"'�+ bd /4�� Ym t i �.+, .3,r , .� ,{, r,r CITY �OF 1"I AR � • S abre . , d I �,r•, C 0 m o n September 23, 1988 i Mr. Keith Liden, Sr. A' SR. Planner City of Tigard 4 t,. P.O. Box 23397 • . Tigard, OR 97223 • • • l Re: Puget Corporation G. Site: 7440 SW Bonita Rd. . .. Dear Mr. Liden: is • As you are aware, we have recently begun construction at 7440 S. W. a Bonita Road in Tigard, OR. In the process of clearing the blackberries j and associated brush, we have discovered the embankment to Fanno , Greeks considerable further away from the proposed asphalt parking 4. area than was indicated on the early topographic drawing. , • This is partict tl Orly true in the area indicated on the attached drawing. Since this is the case, and Puget does need the additional space to , effectively maneuver trucks in and out of the loading dock, Puget Corporation desires to enlarge the parking area by the amount shown on the drawing. We anticipate turning the parking areas over to the asphalt contractor for rock and paving the first wee1, of October. We would appreciate your response at your earliest convenience. Sincerely y, SABRE (0T,„I0 O COM?AN Ross N3cE 'o .�-- t Project anager a I y ,v I � , . I r 1t712.N Cft r Circle PO BOx 452?? krllcr ,Oregon 9 2 D8 j Teleonono 503.28E47-74 a 4 Y , i 0 .,.+xww..n.o.,»«.,,,,,,,a,�. �...,+v»w,.,....«.,,...,,,-„«. T». ,....,.,.,..-...,..�..».t,.,,.,,�.t,.w... ,w, . ww. ..».•...a.,,.,+•w,••:a,,..n»ro+.w,..sM-.-r.»+-.�•.m. ,.,w...w...,w..... ..w+,».. xrt,v w•ri.0 .«w.»,�.n, -»�r^+w..ww'MVe✓.m 1,u • r • �' ., ..,. .pie2,014-s mn^” ..... ,+ .LI � Yt w...............h,Mw,.pi„,,.yw'=sY,».,,grwi.rf , .42 , r r • ir . , 1 .,,,,,, . • , 1 , rr . 1 r , rr «•.«tl.>~,_ �..« wM.-.,,.w.,».,a.,.,,r"�'°'�'°•'-..,, xx�. ._..,, F. « .,.,,,>.,.«,.x„, ,.,�r>.. „«., ,,.»�#„�,.. ._.,. .,,«..rr.,. ,w,,,,w,.. »,,»..» ,. w w,>,_, ».«wx.,..,r«,,,�,»,,. „�.,«»w,w MPr�„a«�r,.« �� •�i�j�� . d,-c , :/e b «. ..wM..rw ..,,..,.,„,:.,- ................ �. �� ,,...,,, ,..,..., ..._.. �� 6.l� zd ��'« t�„ may/ ,' ,,,,. � wh , � f,w , / / . , ,w„w-,,K .a...wm„».,a.� «.�„w iw.+x.•. , ernr.4;w• ,' .ex-.,,rw ...x u.{, -„,,,�-. .,.n..�,� i/ ,..,. .: ,, , , .,,«,a,.«, ,w rt,j.- ,..-w.......ww,..,,,-..ten,*, ....,. w,..r„a ..a.,,. .a n.,,„<,......w,-,n�W< , w , . ,.,w, w,a,.,�v a-.,a».ne»w.v .,Mwi».,.».m,.,», ' - n,,.<„ .» .-„...., «+...-,.,, .« .... ..w.,.,<aw,d•r.,...wn»,.,-�.,...,,,, as •,.t»r.w»....,. .r..�,waswn....ww.xm'. ' - _ - , .,, ,.,, ,.��,,.,.w,n. µw.�w..n«e.H..,,,u.,....,«..,,i w. •w. rv. «+.w w..a .v,.., ».r»w, ,.�.,r�.r rmw.. I { ,.,,.,,,...__.,..�,.�n�H.,�»..�,.<..x.�..,w..,w:v.�,�.�,,,_..�,.�.,.,�..•.�.r,»»«„.,,��.�...�... .,,<..»�,� „ �, ....,. Iii 1 L, ' SABRES Ct�N5Tf�UCTIpN CCSMt�A V . ,,z;J1^,...,,,,,tr.rA,i=1«r.1,4., ..:.i..r.�Law,t:;;x, ztl;ik:,C�r4r.,.: =rt�..:,S. ,t'.:,°:,.4.k3.444M._.,•,,.:.::a;.:7�.krr.�.•M ,.,.. �d;r,,..x:M”,;1 i, „-.., s” BUSS LRO`e r4O i r MAWAGGIi .+ r...� I. „ . ,.. .... . . ,,, .,, „' , �,,�t.:t»'.,r ;S;:;i'AS.i,k[+Cl,,,,•.K:N4C ;,r.9..»eG,« ,,. F n.. '" � , 72J5 5 wVGh FCAU ! ) • yy 'ij , I ' 1 • ..,.. ....a... ..._ »...,,....,..,la.,,..,.w.._ ..,.wl,........_.....,.•,1,`n..�_.,.„ A ...... «..,_..,.. ,�._._..,..,._..a....,,.Y�„'.�' .,..,.....+. -.. .I...,... .. ..:u,., _..,«•--N.......7 ,...,ul.. a;4.�,:.,.....,.,�.�ei,.:_...a,.,, 1 1 ..,� 1 - 4 ,,,r6., .•, .-e.98a•,c' i'. ,..„..:",,.t.'.. ”" ' �.N,..�.11.Nw_ .. . ..�,. .M.r ,.�N ' (((d(((ryry . a.w :.w_.... 1 I N wxwr.ww.am.+nw—....+W+.�VU,iµ'An w Y. s>r.- »rN•un 1N.rp. tow�kMMMUYw, w +ww1W rwr .r. ten.. N+N.wwMhww•r✓wrY4wn.� I d1 .w. 1 .,. r,. F +Mt.,+w.'�.F�,r+w .r. Mt iunfrl-�'•'.�'='/w+��.�Y.+-rrMHU rl�� . u i � +..-a.0 ru e.,a s,rx�MWu+..w.p NY.Ii.+nY`-.+•,.i+'w+r '1 i � � i 11 «w.,a..—.-..wN....« �..... .,w„.w+•n., ...,«�.+�.w....+,4'... .,.:„� �.<.x x r ..N...r,.r ». .,....-r: ��'.,.�.,p .� ,w',�...s ....nw+...........,u ,. t', �4/ ;� f U l - I I 1 ' ' • I I y ••�. � ., I, f,. '.. • . ,, .,. .. ^ Y � r it ' I . I I f, A � , ! , 4;d'k�1 •1 f�. • M 1 n... ',-. .�.p• . ,1 v l 1. r .• a P • • ' .. : , • I: '; . . i . . (, \ . 4-, . ,,, . „ CITY or TIGARD, OREGON , IF, ' , .. RESOLUTION NO , . f ' :.'A: IN THE MATTER or THE ADOPTION or A FINAL ORDER, UPON CITY COUNCIL REVIEW OF AN .'' ' APPEAL or A HEARINGS orrIm APPROVAL OF A SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR 88712) AND SENSITIVE LANDS (SL 88-02) REQUESTED BY PUG ET CORP. : , ,. . ...............*............................................................................. . .a . WHEREAS, this matter comes before the City Council at its meeting of September 1, . .. 12, 1988, upon the filing of an appeal by John Skourtes of a Hearings Officer ..,, ,... approval of a Site Development Review and Sensitive Lands application subject . to conditions; and , ,, ' WHEREAS, the Council had before it the: 1) vicinity map; 2) He gs arin Officer h J ' * decision; 3) copies of the appeal from John Skourtes; 4) Randy Wooly memo• , • ..,. addressing street improvement issues; and, 5) hearings transcripts, / , I . NOW THEREFORE, based 011 the record in this case, the Tigard City Council . . upholds the H gs earin Officer decision and conditions of approval with , '.. . . , . . modifications to the findings and conditions as written below: . } . The applicant participated in an LID for for the improvement of 74th Avenue in , . . . , / 1082, At that time, no development by the landowners was planned and the City ■ limited the construction costs imposed on the landowners to $05,000, That , . . limitation required a revision to the street standard to an "interim" standard \v..*.: to keep the costs within the budget, irl 1984, the City app,,,oved an expansion , ' . to this facility and made no change io the "interOn" standard for the street. . / w Hoever, the applicant is now before the City to nearly double the size of its , •• . . f . operation, The City consistently requires applicants to bring roads and . , . utilities to standard in conjunction with new development, There is no t . , ' dispute that the road as presently built is not to standard for an industrial 01'041, ) . , NOW, THEREFORE, IT 18 HEREBY ORDERED THAI' SOR 88-12 and SL 88-02 be and her .eby i „ ,..1 ,.., are approved subject to the following conditions: .2 , ,‘ •• 1. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, THE rollownw CON SH DITIONS ALL tsr SATISFIED, • i a, Standard half-street improvements, including concrete sidewalk, il : • , . 1 , driveway apron, curb, asphaltic concrete pavement, sanitary sewer, •-:: storm drainage, streetlights and underground utilities ( 5 i • practical), shall be installed along the 74th Avenue frontage, , . Improvements shall conform to the alignment of existing adjacent improvements, The pavement thickness Shall consist of 3 inches, of ' • ''. asphaltic concrete pavement on 2 inches of (8/4"-0) and 8 inches of (2"-O) aggregate baserock, The property owner shall execute a waiver . . of remonstrance on forms provided by the City, waiving the right to 1 • : . . •- , object to the formation of a future local improvement district for ; ., purpose of constructing an asphalt pavomoht ovorlay on SW 74th , • )• ‘ } .,,,• RESOLUTION NO, 88.-611 • ..., Page 1 „ ....• .: 1 . 1 . ,:. ./y . , . . „ , / / • : • ,•., .,, , - ,, ' . • . , „ . , . /,. , , , , _ ,• • . , .. , • .. • , . i . . , • Avenue. It is . aerstood that the pavement ove ,. Nay will be deferred [., • until such time as a substantial portion of SW 74th avenue has been • ;• improved and paved between Bonita Road and Durham Rod and additional . pavement thickness is needed to support expected traffic loadings. i3 Said condition shall not in itself establish precedent as to future ' improvements of S.W. 74th Avenue. b. Additional right—of—way shall be dedicated to the Public alone the , . 74th Avenue frontage to increase the right—of—way f—way to 25 feet form the centerline . The description shall be tied to the existing ' - centerline, The dedication document shall be oh City 1' �•, right—of—way l� , , forms and approved by the Engineering Section, Dedication forms and j instructions are available from the Engineering Section, il.: c. The northern driveway shall be relocated or depleted to comply with : • - . the ;0 foot spacing requirement between driveway aprons. F , d, A permi.t or evidence demonstrating compliance shtral.l, be obtained ned by . the applicant from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Authority: Section 404, Clean Water act,, 38 U.S.C, 1344) for discharge or dredge or fill material into wager's of the United States. A. copy of the permit shall be provided to the C;'ty Engineering Office by the arpIicant. /' e, The appl icarit, shoal i pr�ovide for r^oof pool p�ar�king lot ra n drainage to '. the public ; torrnwator drainage system, • .. . f, Five (5) sets of plan and profile public improvement construction • : ; plans and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a• ,. Registered Professional Civil Lngineer, detailing all proposed public .'. • improvements shall be submitted to the Engineering Section for 1 � " approval,, TTwo (2) sets of plan and profile plan 5 shall be submitted : • for preliminary review prior (:o submittal of final plans, ' , . .. g, Construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering section has approved public improvement plans. • The section will required 100 percent performance assurance or letter of commitment, with payment of a permit Pee and a sign . . installation/streetlight fee, Also, the execution of a street opening permit or construction compliance agreement shall occur prior .r.1' ;,o or concurrently with the issuance of approved public improvement • • �. plans, r '�• � h, A revised site and landscaping plan shall be submitted for Planning Director approval which includes the following items: ' . 1 I.he parallel parking spaces near 74th Avenue shall have Minimum dimensions or 8,5 feet by 2,, feat; . 2, The northern drivt way in the now parking area shall h omitted. 3 . Specific species and size of landscaping materials shill be Jr idcsotified, 4, Specific plans ill`astrating how the two trees located ih they southern parking lot will be raved as indicated,, krsOLUtZON xO, eta— (71- „ .) Page :^ M '' j:. • 1 , Two rrrdaci, d parking spaces> wxtkar easL access to building , " entrances, 1 • x , the '100 year floodplain shall be dedicated to the public from Bonita Road to the south property boundary, The dedication document s shall be on forms approved by the City and shall be r ecorde . with Washington County. • 2 All items noted ire condition ahavt� .(h) a shall be installed prior to , occupancy of the new 20,000 square foot addition, . 3. This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the fitful decision date, date,. tl unit 4, The � air conditioning x and any other outdoor mechanical equipiY►eitl. shall comply with applicable DEQ noise standards PASSED: This c C.e t ) 'day of ' �}��-4 �` 1988, 1 . ATTEST: Ma+yor, — City of Tigard wh.. r•ilwMwl+n. .Nw...n•Iwnrr. ..uM++nnr.rM�iMWw..Mwn ' �• , Deputy Recorder ^- City o Tigard ard Unnyy APPROVED AS TO P'OtM; • • ( .w .. city Rocor`der`I • 9 NM li.wa<V!M.K• \wMw.» ,.1M..n1�+ur.n.wM.1iMUM1�w.1rN4nMWw«nMw.rr+rwr4'wwn+u.M�Mrr.M.....lr..n ' .. laat ht/7C 650 • • • I I f 1 I I I 1 ' . uhw.whhlhn.hh+' I Page 1 : ' .• I • I yy qq . , : c T� Q I f I y 3 OREGON s COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: 9/26/88 » _ . ' DA`I1 SUBMITTED: 9/) //N8 ' • •'•` ISSUE/AGENDA «•N« W NN V Jr.l.••xN«..MFM.». , r , �if':i»TLE:r »«»SUR 88-12/SL 88-02 PREVIOUS ACTION: Council modification ' Pu e.1: Cud'. ,� aka» a.1. • xx»«Nw»« •x-ry of Elear rIc.s Uffic erN,_cis .: rs1.2ri 9/12/88 / f , " . xrrrlrlr w! «« .INx•».f»•x rrNx•.»..N...«...»«wF.r•Ir.»»».•r••.xw. »x.«, fNr.«......w• ..1�»«»_l..»«..x.,_.»_.,.•!r•«•.»•»M»Nx....f+ x»•u»...»»•.•»«xx._.•_I_..»».»x.N»»..r...Fr " '1.. . »»xx»Mrx_»_» NN»»..r. »«•I•— PREP A R ED BY: 1<e i 12 L 1.c:I r~:ri/1 aryr1y G19 o_.kl ! 111/: . • f DEPT HEAD OR c "I»Y A?M1:111 Olt (Y N.S� 1 «•xxx».xw�««»_»^I»»» xxFx�r...f � i N» « I�FIUi;.M INFf� BY rr/.. 1 ! r rl•• r•W «N � r/N Nlrr Hr 1fp• ills ••x•fI NN1N r f»N 1• •+F•Nx•M •rlr• NIx NrIN• r f i 1 rNr••r•rr . •f+N» 1 r1 1 f rIN• r•« �:�::• r f 1 x1111•« x rr .rr»xl 1•• »•x•x• r I r•x • N1.1•N•• r:,rl r::iu N 1 fN�r�i MN r r rr Nxt:•M»xN f 1 :�1I:N« »N «I Nx»I�1»rNN«Nill:I r N»rN««x1F•fxlNl«Ilfl�:::: +1»x•x t r•wr • 1 IrrINr N•rx •NN•x••i1:::::rrflN+w �' �� ' POLICY ISSUE F ' ,;• I I ..Nll•x 1INy f•N1NMa.x N•NINI/x•x N rf.rr»Nll•x 1x.1MI•rN•r.xx••NI•Ix1.lIr1N•Nxle1.1111 1x1:+•I•rNr•.•Nr11•. FIr.N .N« •xNN I•. •, • ' INr«I•IIr11 rl 1 g'::;:WNN,r NNN N•Nr N•Nr•II.II NNNNI tI•NI IN•x•rlrllllr•N1•N«INN«11•r••::1«N••11••rNNN111n«::::: •» ;, f 1 N�rINNM NN»Nflr« •rN•«xN••r1 r. ••III• II.1111N•N••NNNr•INIw.IIHN:NNNINNN«NN«+xNr•rlf:1: xxi+IMFFN:NM•xWx•NIN«Nx::1111:1 xNrl•«•fi11✓N IIINNNN»INNNNNNI+ffry«HrMIx NIN.Ir»«rN•x rx Nll•1 llrl«N«N«rir•.:rxll«N..•rNN«IN/I.FII•F•r.w ' II\IFORMATXOI11 SUMMARY • ' • r � t . �8 � C c. r a � � 2, 1. 8, the. f�c �r� �.�.' �modified i:I•�� 14�.�r:�r t s .O f f x.e�»r erl�»G i..�ion r� for� r � r � ti , J 1 1 �t.l�.F•.L Cca�^ >cr�t'�-��1:'xcan �it�r� t�z r•�.�.,1w�.c:1 ��:a `� r' f� •, •, r� I �''�•'staff E are c • Nf !: � Ca I� � 1"�.r�<��. � r~ca k»: r c.f��c:t�.r�� 1�F5� ,. 4'.,e •I art)c4rlc illea l'It s �. ¶. • xN7.•:1N11•x N««••I Nr•N»t rNwrr IN«l....=.N1N1 NNw x•1•11•• I r• •«r::N«I:N::N :MII 11xNN••r :rW» WM»:tt.::N•IM•»Ix.NFNN xxx H NN •«rr•»1«N•• r1x 1 1•N1rNNx»I I I•N N1N Nl•xx•N«N wl••Ilrr �INNNf•!/ iii: �1 1 N•1 N•rr•+».• •N Nl::r: � � 1 ' AL»'IERNA'r1IVIS CONSIDERED •• Arltu17uarlcitI'►ra a1;1;ar:hreyd iryusc�ltairsny ��• ' � >.•�� ' fN N lNNI Wg�NI+::x»1 N»N.IN N W:rIl UINwNNHNNIHIU»l«N« .r0N1»NMI N«1.qpr..yy 11f f.1 u•I«1rotur. «Nrx•N..r.;; •••N1NHMfNx•N»H..;?..w.lx»w•«N•Ir•«xwI,,U,=•..r•»wNl•uN rI» •wµ, I•N•M•xkI uM: •;:r.«iN N..N nI::nN•uWxly11tlxxNN:W••l.« •ITx»r•N rr..N.N.N wxl b•U»..»�•i.{»r.»xrxN.«INN;M•.:.xhNf. N,.l; ' ' • '�� FISCAL .L Mph ,T � I ,• i P 1•. • NN Nt r ••HINN 1',.:H••Nx»NrININI N»•N«1 F N»,IN1WN1 NW•r. wxwx IN4M«««IFWNNIN1IN««N1 111 N1x 1?.r.t: lr••NNr NNN r11 r x N«•NI»MN.Iffx»««N«Y f NNrN«,=',:INN?,:•:r Nf«I1NN•NrfWN».•1•«xNH1INWNNNNN»NMf»!INt•NIN NNNNI»•INNNNNNNNNINN IN I H•:i1..NNN NN4 N r�NINM•NNN1NNMUxNN1INNN»NNNNNr«NN•FH•F• i , ). . SUCGFS 'Fp e)CT': ON F . N1J..»»r.»w ...w«» '' Adopt the at tach d resolution, cs/�0651. I ' r �I t. I i I lip '..! I i I ■ I • •, 8 W._ • • CITY OF " IG RD, OREGON I , 1'rl' OI U"1":ION NO. 88'-- • IN THE N� CN ► � ADOPTION O1 � FINAL ORDER,, U Ou CITY COUNC IL rr y Evx :w OF AN APPEAL OF A HEARINGS OFFICER CE APPROVAL OF A SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR 88•-12) • AND SENSITIVE y LANDS `84 88-02) REQUESTED B P y E" CORP. : u WHEREAS, this matter comes before the City Council at it meeting of ' Hearings September 12, 1988, upon tha filing of an appeal by John Skourt � of a Of xcer approval of a Site Development Review and Sensitive Lands application subject to conditions; 'an WHEREAS, the Council had before it the: 1) vicinity map; 2) Hearings Officer ' decision; 3) copies of the appeal from John 5kourtes; 4) Randy Wooley memo addressing street improvement;''issues; and 5) hearings transcripts, NOW, 'THEREFORE, based on the record in this case, the Tigard City" Council upholds the Hearings Officer decision r and conditions � t approval wartht modifications to the findings and conditions as.'written below: y LID ti r h�. � a.�artt participated 1 c.lr t�.�:, i>1 �.C X 1. .,1 Ct �.a t •t tip � p rt, IM.AI� ft.r for l.h�. improvement or 74th Avenue in . 1582, At that tithe, no development by the landowners was planned and the City . f limited the construction costs imposed on the landowners to $95,000, That limitation required a revision to the street standard to ah '""interim" standard �t to keep the costs within the budget. In 1984, the City approved an expansion' to this facility and rh, de rto change in the "interim" standard for the street. , e However, the applicant is now before ore the City to nearly double the , ;� " 1 � sir, City y ��, ♦.�f` its operation. " applicants « ationl a �.� r . ; �"he C 1 i City consistently ' requires to bring ' roads and • utilities to standard in conjunction with new development There is ,no dispute that the road as presently built is not to standard for an 'indu:t r x♦' . a�. area, HEREBY .[y 1,.�1 „ 1 I"r and`( r j . �I � I�r��l l�M��I ORDERED 1 V1 Mll 1 « ��:� r'4 rt`H 1tti.1 ' II NOW, THEREFORE, "" :;; '1 117�.r.1 THAT SDR 813 12 and :w L:: 8� O2 •� �ykty I , v . ar o approved, subject to the following conditions! ly. ��r , ' ri y 1, PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING A RM TS., THE F"OLL"OWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED, S',IAFF CONTACT FOR CONDITIONS' A-0, i3A►zY (Lr SON, PHONE NUMBER 6♦ ✓"417�, r Ud CONDITIONS °w� � � r" L�KHU, PHONE NUMBER 639-4171. I " a, Standard half—street improvements, including concrete sidewalk,Cewal <,' drl"ivewi y apron, curb, asphaltlic, concrete pavement, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, streetlights and underground utilities . (as practical), shall be installed along the 74th Avenue frontage, Impr°"="eML$ shall coinfor'm to the alignment of exist.irtz, adjacent ilproVemert;. The pavement tic k ne, " shall consist of 8 inches of asphaltic concrete pavement on 2 inches of ( /e--O) and 8 inches of (2"r—O) aggregate ba3 erock 1 The property c ne r shall execute c waiver I or ric rrtonst:rar1ce on fors prr+oVided by the City, waivirtc, 'the right to RESOLUTION Cn t0 ��" Page • I I I I I I • .• ti object to t:hc, ..Jrrmat::ion of a future local imOi c vement district for the purpose of constructing an asphalt pavement overpay on SW 74th Avenue, It a.s understood that the pave nt overlay will be deferred until such time as a .substantial portion of SW 74th avenue has been improued and paved between Bonita Road and Durham Road and additional pavement thickness is needed to support expected traffic loadings, b, Add:i,tiornal right—of—way shall be dedicated to the Public alone the • r• y 25 Veet form the 74th Avenue �"�,��r�t�xg<?' to a.racr•�!aa�? the right—of—way to �:. >. centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right—of—way centerline The dedication document shall be on City forms and zapprovec� by the Engineering Section, Dedicatiron forms and • ' instructions are available from the. Engineering Section. ' V ti `� The nor hem driveway sk 11 be relocated or deleted deleted to comply with the 3J foot spacing requirement between driveway aprons, d. A permit or 'evidence demonstrating compliance shall be obtained by . the applicant from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' (Authority Section 404, Clean Wateir� act, 3.3 li, �.C. 1.844) for discharge or dredge or fill material into waters of the United States . A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineerin Office by the •4`. applicant, 1 The applicant shall provide for rloo'f and parking lot rain dr ina J t the public stor'►rtwater drainage system. (5) sets of plan and profile public improvement construction plans and one (l.) itemized construction cast estimate, stamped by a • Registered Professional Civil Engineer, detailing all proposed public 14, improvements shall be submitted to the Engineering Section for ;,,,,,..7 approval, Two (2) setts of plan and profile,' plans shall be submitted . for preliminary roview prior to submittal' of final' pl ans. '. Construction r tf � �aasei ptbl ac improvements vcn rt� shall l rot commence until ' ' ' after the Engineering section has approved public improvement plans, The section will required 100' percent performance asturance or letter r commitment, with payment o1 a permit fee and a ;tigrt o f i' y ' ,,,.7..'. f c el A , the executi on c n of a street N � '1 I opening' permit: or construction compliance agreement shall occur prior ' ' :o or concurrently with the issuance of approved public iiitprovement: plans, A h, A revised site and landscaping plan shall be for rr c ,. . , Director approval which includes the following items: 1, The parallel parking spaces' near 74th Avenue shall have min1muilt 1 • dimensions��s o f � r feet by y 20 foot, ;n: 2. The northern driveway i n the nc`.w parking`,area shall be oini tterrl 8, Specific species and size of landscaping materials shall be identified. Specific lans illustrating haw the two trees located in there southern parking lot will be saved as indicated. • ' 1 urwOLu-r r Ol�l NO. 88— l n wrvb w Page r . 1 • • 5, two hcandic i..,aod parking spaces within eas access to building entrances. I 1< . i , The :100 year f.baud pl a y n shall be dedicated to the public from Bonita Road to the south property boundary, The dedication documents shall be on forms zxppr'oved by tho City and shall be recorded with { Washington County. �, All items noted in condition 1(h) above shall be installed prior to • occupancy of the new 20,000 square foot addition,,, a This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final decision 4, The air conditioning unit and any other oUt1oor mechanical equiliament shall c ly with applicable DEQ noise standards, PASSED: This day of 1988, • • r rr♦wwrwr♦f»wM w»wr{wr.rrr»"wwrwwrwMwr»r{rHww..» Ar.iT S•1»; Mayor- City ofTigard r I Deputy Recorder • City of Tigard APPROVED AS TO FOR Mt City Recorder rwiMwrwr..'w»rrwNlw rwwrl»w.•riN.llwMwt wrxwwl«wrWrrMwwr"N1W.rrrrWw.r.rrfr.rw.IWrr..rrr I"r"4•.r{rr.wr.wrM »"rrrrr rr F • ii iwf{Ir{wrN{»Iw rr"t{rr»«r.»»rr{rur '• wr{rwrr{rr•rwlMr.rr.rNr lwr w..Nr.r:....•.ww.wrw{..r«.r«Mwrwr.wNr..xrW.w '� � ' ht/70650 •} �' • • I ESOLU"f"xoN NO, 88— I M r ,.r r .i' • •��,. ! ' a`*'w,. ....�..w4„�.,.wL...,,,.,.wr,...,.•w:,. .,.-.� �. .... .. _ .....,. ,.,. - .-,w...w.n-_Ir.—.N4..... .,.,,.,L.,.u,.•... �A...r.,e..n.. .. .-.,..-l...w....J.u.....,:.,....nr-, ar a..k....-.%l a-„L4W.,.,.V-'i...,..,r,t.-..r.+....xaN'v.FL:..:l,....F ww...,..,_ al..,».nwa..H �'�✓ ✓ . ‘--2 K CITY OF TIGARD r OREGON T � COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY - ' AGENDA OF:Du S ,�t C� �h� 1 1988 DATE SUBMITTED:: timb � 6, 19p8 • , _ ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: 8$ 12 PREVIOUS ACTION: N i r th s Gffic r„ Y.SL 88-02 orr.w apprOva1 sub k ect to cond i ti ns •w.w ; . L,. PREPARED BY: Ke of th L idea .wwN ;;,, DEPT D 01fc_.11V\A,.CITY ADMIN OK” +1- REQUES'T'ED BY: _ _ • )rw wwwrrrw.w«w.rr NN•••••HIWrw"ww W«M•'•.•«w-»ww•{--- µlw•:•w•{•w•w.w.•• "+ --4.•ww•••w Hwww•w••rwww•:w••"•• .—.."-r N rw•rr«wwwww...N....- +H ,I wr"••N.•rrrw•r•fw•ww••w•ww•wurN+Warr•«w•w««w.�wrlH.w••+ww«w.rr. w. . ' : POLICY ISSUE • t µ::: .r... •w W. , f. •rrrwww r.,wrrH ».. wN N-w«ww ."�:'rw...l.ww.«iw»wpw «...r. ww"'l:.a"lo..•wNw'N...•.«N.«.�+. i.:.�..».ri«w......•.�{iwww N «y"fiw�•Iww..»«.w'.:r«N«ilf •..""....w�•1-..w.N.•-......w Ili'-+..«.ww.«.w...w.=rr«..w....:i..«W....w..�:.':." INFORMATIOIII' MMARY ,•� On July 6, 1988, thie Hearings �lOfficer granted' approval. for the, Puget Corp, to 1 expand its existing facility on the corner of Bonita Road and 74th Avenue • •: subj pct to c;urid iLii ns, Mr r iSkc rtes, why 1 nct obj edtirig to the p,�rcp,�r� ��d I ekpary ien1 ap tiled the deci; is n be aus�� the treet� ir+tpr��v merit r quiremertts �Urt 74th Avenue, and because the same (n' likely be H required of him if he •. � develops a property to the south on 74th Avenue, Atta'dhcd it a vicinity map, • •• Hearings Officer Decision, John Sker tes I appeal, memo frluiri Randy Woo ley , " •• discussing straet inmprovement' issues, and hiear^ir)g transcripts,, The trGarnscripts , are of, poor qualify due t:o an „_lectrr cal maIf-unctiut-i that has now been r paired, 1 ' }r=F«wNN«,wNw.•NNW.,==.:::=:+ 4.,-,:.,= rNrf=..tt1/•::::,=1N{wfe =.,..wrr.:.•NIMNrw..7, ••N••w:t..1. .•wwr,Nnr".i•Yrwwl{W=,,,rrr•rr hi w•rwr•w""•..N«wr+.w«r•w=4,,,rr..tr: 4.-.w.ih .4-.-4r 1rw.• Nr W 1 i }. N111NN«•Nwwrf.l rl«hN,fWNINrrNwrH.ININfhrNWNNNINWNwr••rWYN..NNNHWNruNw.rwNrNWWhwHI«•.wwrgNw•rNhwN{hWNrNMwlwrNwwNwHr.hwWr,r iNwwNNNrrwW«wwfHNNrrM.r.•`rrWWwNNrrrM+«.rw«yhlHwrwN1NW,{WwH••rw �N:,r•r•J.IrrFl{rrwilwr�W1 �v 'k AI,rT'ERNATIVES CONSIDERED i 1, Uphold the Hearings Officer decision, 2 Modify the Hear3.rtgs Officer decision, • • 3. � R�.�t�7d the decision x1 n to �h, Hearings�a x rg s Officer for further r e v i e h i I � � , r •, N.N,Wrlf-..-2.wW.,,,, NNrr fIN,NNNUNriwNr«wwlwv,•:: NllxtH,... whwNw1:N:., NwNwl w Mwr.,• -,.?.«NH1HW.+WNnNhNrl•«wNH:-..,N NwINNr.wN1•1NhNrz..1., w==,-r• w NrwIWW.-..zw••tNwhwwN:,== .-.7r HhwrM..-174}Nwww«w wrww•wW.ww.hrwrNNIWrNNNz:;,:z1 . IMPACT FISCAL IMPA .ww. wNN«Hwf,=....=4lt ttrw.•WllrwrWte,, Wr:z,,: 4.,-.lww.«r.NIwwt.,,,trNN14N r,:z,.wwN+..h« t,t.,:rwwHl wr Nwrw rN,.., NwwNN.w-.N .NNMN« .....- wN•f-- .,.. « vw=....ww1N•Nf MM wll«wNNlM SUGGESTED �AGT: ON ' r;. N _ H wwN h�.._ • 0Ir 1, Uphold tho H aarincjs' Officer d !cision and adopt tuse attrta hod resolution, , ., ht:/6876D. t it i Attachment i •r • { r A . • . . . • ,•• , , , • , • 00.00**00*.0■0000.00*■10■0000..0.00■0* LAND USE DECISION APPEAL FILING FORM knri The City of Tigard supports °4e citizen's right to AL4704,11,A, • participate in local government. Tigard's Land Use . Code therefore sets out specific requirements for cm/OF TIGARD filing appeals on certain land use decisions. OREGON The following form has been developed to assist you in filing an appeal of a land use decision in proper form. To determine what filing fees will be required or to answer any questions you have regarding the appeai process, please contact the Planning Division or the City Recorder at 639-4171 . 1. APPLICATION BEING APPEALED: Hearings Officer Notice of Final Order SL 88-02 and SDR 88-12 2. HOW DO YOU QUALIFY AS A PARTY: Attached letter 3. SPECIFIC GROUNDS FOR APPEAL OR REVIEW: Attached letter • • 4, SCHEDULED DATE DECISION IS TO 8E FINAL: 7/29/88 3:30 p.m. 5, DATE NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION WAS GIVEN: 7/13/88 6. SIONATURE(8): Attached letter is signed. 4(400t4t-H-X-X-X40(40(4044i-X4+1•10440(4044(400004400(44,*(**Xii-kii-X-k*H4(4.x444fx•040000+3(44401400(40(40000040444,. EPliEngLALPAILL Rq-ceiY0 BY:LtqOkttgj..Date! 7 eileis Ti"1,-)?±If;ewl, ApOroved As To Form Byt_ . .LJX4IL).09,_. Date: 42___Timo: AMS Denied As Ti Form By: bate: TiMe: 44400004.4.14.X.40000(4(4044004.0.0344iii-X-X404-X40(4004-x-M*X.X5i44*- 40t-X-1440(400(44440(4004,404-04(it*X-444(4 1w/4846A Al&ta I 4664,, -6, 44 det44,rutrtiei *4, a/4w ---2/aqigir 1frfl StP 13125 SW,Hall Blvd„ O.Box 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97 23 (503)637-4171 , " • s.,..,...e.,........(. 4u .:.J...0 -...... ....-_.x.n-........ ...i..».......i._.-.....o.... A 'L...,a.,.x...l...,.s.:h x..s.. .,x.a..,...sr,....u....,...1.,..«....,.....w...+.......»..sv< ._-...x...,.rur<......., s ..,. ' 47• July 28/ 1988 i '. City offV Tigard P.O. Box 23397 • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 12 and SDR 8812 Subject: Appeal and or reopen hearing Case number 88-4 , 4 Gentlemen: • on inaccurate source materials and . Hearing officer� findings were based n testimony furnished to her by City employees who were not present in j'•' • 1982 when representations and agreements were made between City of Tigard i',, and 74th TAD property owners. I was spokeperson,'for 100% of the affected property owners concerning the 1982 i', . 74th LID and am fully abreast of the agreements made. Agreements the ro ty owners council City officers Ag is made with � p per ers b the City coup 1 and Ci � a.cers must be honored today FACTS: 1 . The property owners had cost estimates which showed the the project built :. � :Mr. for ..�r � ,� : meetings the dity be f �o� 4Q0. and.. this, figure ure was blessed y , Engineer, Mr Frank Currie in several preliminary gs that were held , with city officers including the City Manager: The only City; standards to be deleated that the property owners approved p approval and representations made the the City Council for the 14 June 1 82 a r were as follows: / a: 24 feet of pr epared and pav ed su r face to ci ty ty specifications;, initial ', l . proposal called for thirty feet of preparation and, paving. , b. defeat curbs and sidewalks. If the employees of the City unilaterally changed the . si cif i cat io ns after ' the 14 June 82 date the City most ass ume sole responsibility. • i'. • • ` Page 2 July 28, 1988 4 I I described in the hearing 'fficer s findings of interim as hearing Definition is in error. It was agreed between the parties prior to the Council meeting and during i ` • the hearing on 14 June 82 the word interim was being used only because b codes enumerated earlier under . of the deviation from then existing city I } ' a. and b. Thisproject was never represented as a temporary improvement. �r I,I The second agreement made inconjunction with the first agreement between the City of Tigard and the property owners and most be honored today I is as follows: After the balance of 74th Street is paved to a full thirty feet and curbs and sidewalks installed in this section the. City has a right to go back and widen the 1982 LID l portion of the street six more feet and install curbs etc. and bill the property owners accordingly. The property owners agreed' : to waive their right to remonstrate. Again if the (City failed to secure all the applicable documents for the above we the property owners can not be held responsible. Summation: The City in their fidicuary role most be compelled to honor agreements . and representations made in 1982 and enumerated above, Therefore Puget Cororation is under no. City obligation to do anything to 74th Street because in July 1988 approximately 2,650 feet of 74th is still a gravel) • patch. Furthermore property owners are not responsible for any deviations • made to city standards unilaterally by City employees We should remember that the property owners paid the $95,000 to grade and pave the str City to protect our interest. p street. We relied on the C�.t I have noted that the 14 June 82 transcript notes ar very p are incomplete. Testimony of myself, Dan Mercer, and Geoff Levear can substantiate' everything noted in this letter together with records and notes in ' our possession. Si cer"1y Yours, Jd� 1 4 ' R. Skourtes 17010 S.W. Weir Rd. Beaverton;i Oregon 970°7 I ' copies to: Dan n Mercer er . . I Geaf f Levearv, ' I f yl ;�'y, .,., a rr•rr..mr.......r.r.. . I ,r, r 1 I . 11 . • o • • CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 8 -- IN THE MATTER Or THE ADOPTION OF A FINAL ORDER, UPON CITY COUNCIL REVIEW OF :AN APPEAL OF A HEARINGS OFFICER APPROVAL OF A SITE, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ( OR 88-12) AND SENSITIVE LANDS (SL 88.-O2) REQUESTED BY PUGET CORP. ', WHEREAS, this ,natter comes before the City Council at its .Meeting of September 12, a 1988, upon the filing of an appeal by John Skortes of a Hearings Officer approval of a Site Development Review and Sensitive Lands application subject to conditions; and WHERES, the Council had before it the: i ) vicinity map; 2) Hearings Officer , decision; 3) copies (.1 the appeal from John Skortes; 4) Randy Wooley memo , , addressing street improvement issues; and�� 5) hearings transcripts. • NOW, THEREFORE, based on the record in this case, the Tigard City Council upholds the Hearings Officer decision and conditions of approval (Exhibit "A") , 1 PASSED: This � day of .. ..r 1988, ar; A,iTEST; Mayor -. City of Tigard iM.I,W-.•-... -Ii.m1�FWJwxwW:.�IW1.4Mw..1NM1wuwr..MWrw.N..Y1IxIwrM iUMNW-n•.r1..r.IwiWMrw..1` I.NNI Deputy Recorder w- City of Tigard Alit ROVED AS TO FORM, city Recorder, ht/6871 h) • RESOLUTION NO 1 • a EXhi "WI BEFORE THE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR ) SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND SENSITIVE) NO. 88-12 AND LANDS REVIEW TO EXPAND AN EXISTING ) 88 °02 INDUSTRIAL BUILDING; Puget Corp. , ) Applicant. ) The above-entitled matter came before the hearings officer at the regularly scheduled meeting of June 8, 1988, in the Tigard Civic Center Town Hall Room, in Tigard, Oregon; and The applicant requests site development and sensitive lands review �industrial building �eva.ew��to�� expand an � g and to locate a portion of a parking driveway area within the 100-year floodplain, property zoned I-P, Industrial Park and described as Tax Lots 600, 700 and 800, Map 281, Section 12AC, City of Tigard, County of Washington, State of Oregon; and , . The hearings officer conducted a public ;bearing on June 8, 1988, which was continued for further hearing on July 6, 1988, at which time s testimony, evidence end the planning ,department st aff reports were received; and The hearings officer ado p ts the findings of fact and ~I conclusions contained in the staff report, a copy of which is attached hereto, marked "Exhibit A" and incorporated by reference herein pplemental report of the staff, dated July 5, ream, and � the s'u 1988, marked "Exhibit A" and incorporated by reference here a n, and The hearings officer further finds that the applicant's request for relief from the road and utility development t standards for the area serving the site s h ould be denied, The applicant participated d in an LID for the E improvement of 74th , • Avenue in 1982. At that time, no development by the landowners was planned and the City limited the construction costs imposed on the landowners 95 r 000. That limitation required a , ��s to �" revision to the street standard to an "interim" standard to keep th e costs within the I budget. In `,1984/ the CI it Y a pp roved a small ; . expansion to this facility and made no change in the "interim" standard for the street. Hoaavex the applicant is now before the City to nearly double the size of its operation. The City consistently requires • to standard in applicants icaints to bran roads and utilities �p � conjunction with new development. There is no dispute that the road as presently built is not to standard for an industrial area. The hearin�� cffac e r believes that r unlike e t e burden imposed by a local improvement district which is implemented regardless of the economic climate of the time, an expansion such as the one proposed indicates that the applicant's business is doing well and it is now time for the applicant to assume, its l " evelopment standards as published and responsibility to meet the r�. ds shed I . enforced by the City. The "interim" is over and this road (should be brought up to standard as part of this development. ' , I NOW THE REFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED LO T�AT SD 12 and SL II- 02 be and hereby approved, subject to the following k. . 1 are a � © tl� conditions: .. II d PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING I. PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED. STAFF CONTACT FOR CONDITIONS A-0 CAR Y AL.. FS0N# 'J F ' �L � 3ER ��417 FOR CONDITIONS IC Ir E / Lf)EN PHONE r E NUMBER 639-r4171� I I I a. Standard half-street improv+ementsb including r i • rr concrete sidewalk, driveway apron, curb., asphaltic concrete pavement, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, streetlights and underground utilities (as practical) , shall be installed along the 74th Avenue frontage. Improvements shall conform to the alignment of existing ' adjacent improvements. The pavement • a thickness shall consist of 4 inches of asphaltic concrete pavement on 3 inches of (3/4"-0 and 12 inches of -0) aggregate baserock. The existing pavement shall be overlain with 2 inches of asphaltic concrete from the centerline to the west edge of pavement. b. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along, the 74th avenue frontage to increase the right-of- ' way. to 25 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication 3 document shall be on City forms an d approved by the Engineering instructions. ions are' •lahle from • Section. Dedication forms and •nst pct avaa. �I the Engineerin Section: c. The northern driveway shall be relocated or deleted, to comply with the 30 foot spacing requirement between driveway aprons. • d. A permit or evidence demonstrating compliance shall �' be obtained by the a pp lican t from the U.S . �r�� Coups of En g ineers (Authority; Section 404, C 1ean Water Act, 33 V.S.C. 1344) for discharge of dredge or fill material ral waters of the � •' . i i United States.es. A copy of th e per mit shall be provided to the City Engineering Office by the applicant, The applicant shall p rove e for roof and parking lot rain dr ainag e to the Public stotmwater drainage Cysten . f. Five (5) sets of plan and profile public improvement construction plans and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a Registered Professional Civil Engineer, detailing all proposed public improvements shall be submitted to the Engineering Section, for approval. Two (2) sets of plan and profile plans shall be submitted for preliminary review prior to submittal of final plans. g. Construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering section has approved public improvement plans. The section will require a 100% performance assurance or letter of commitment, with payment of a "' permit fee and a sign installation/streetlight fee. Also, the . execution of a street opening permit or construction compliance agreement shall occur prior .to or concurrently with the issuance of approved public improvement plans. h. A revised site and landscaping plan shall be submitted for Planning Director approval which in cludes the following items: (1) � The pc�rc�l,.l..�. parking JL.LAag sp4lV�rs neai:. 74th AM edAuG shall have uinimum of 8.5 feet b u�i1 d�,�4E:n�ions �* 20 feet. ' , (2) The northern driveway in the new parking area shall be omitted. (3) Specific species and size of landscaping materials shall be identified.`� , (4) Specific plans st p u rat�.rlg how the two trees . ' � ) p ns, �,�, , located in the southern parking lot Will be saved as indicated. (5) Two handicapped parking spades within easy . .... access to bun,building g entr a nces. i r i. The 100 year floodplain shall be dedicated to the public from Bonita Road to the south property boundary. The dedication documents shall be on forms approved by the City and , shall be recorded with Washington County. 2 . All items noted in condition 1 (h) above shall be installed prior to occupancy of the new 20, 000 square foot addition. • I I I I 3. This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final decision date. II ; 4. The air conditioning unit and any other outdoor mechanical equipment shall comply with applicable DEQ noise standards. DATED this / day of July, 1988. I I EA" NGS OFFICER APP WED: •t a I BET} SON — I i I I ' I ' I ' II I l • II ;' I ' " I ... ...... .... e.._» L..• w..{..a...1m.,w..ar.a...J„c.,..,-.r.. J�1�.....,1......-.1: .......�F.....d 1...nV'.,... ..r.�,.iL...�.., r a,n,.�.4.� .r_.i� ....J.w.1.:4i.., w,I.n,Ln..•r t Iry lr . l • SW 74TH AVENUE Spring, 1982- -LID proposed for SW 74th AYv,l,naue south of Bonita Rd, April, 1982-- --- Property owners petition for alternative Lib with interim improvements not to exceed $95, 000. 1 August, 1982---LID formed. t • Fall 82/Spring 83--Interim'' improvements constructed City adopts new Development Code. Section 18. 164. 030 5 ufif requires street improvements as condition of 1 development ��: and establishes minimum pavement thicknesses for commercial streets. 1988 --Hearings Officer decision on Puget Corp. application 1 ,.� requires half--street improvements overlay to bring a rovements e.nd ave ! p avement to equivalent to requirements of TMC 18.164.030 r . +J, I 0 �.n{1... a,. '.�,.....'.... .....:............ a ...,.., ,..,, ,,....nm. ....�,.. �., .. ...... ... e, e.,.,, ., ._.,r..,; ,,....., . e...,..... .. ,._,.....i,i .1 .... _ ., .,. ..,. ,..x.,a.,r...., ..'a !a n..,.,. ..,....,, .�.�a .., ._r., ._.,..•, 14,3 . �, w } ,p64 rt. :sOopo,A ISLtt'101 q 440,41oAr l aUT,: •r,x0 u•c,Axrtia ►.i 'U ?(.<4 p eOura4c 44oir./i1;ni• t,t C)) • 4ld0tu0lll'?d HoLlIrt. ; 4 ' 'I al;yu'oww )p�,4 ��;�, �;��-;.��.��:,}s ;�t�i�l'_ �� "��oo'I♦ t•��" �..,�l�irl0,�'�! i,ai.Nz'.,�,�ot,1�r'1��►�p fi�,.a>»��u17:a;�►,�ta fl'>r"� ��)�"►�.� tar.. 1:�t��pt,l0sumOpe,.1: st aLlNo t,14' q1,1 111011vO.,: o0Y?; 0t4'',$ lx rl Fx.41?0,lx?4 a ,.4cic1,44 "J;v?T,.1411100 0 0k:1:;l0.A4.ah1G11, "s1i( j.tdMllJtcillt'?i� l at,I 1 tti�1.11, ` J 1)1X1W Oa, ,I ,Js; S rl ; �o��i<,a�"I�1►i tl h„I,.C.4 l tC l) '4tl601Ji „ 7t'{� J6 fJl1I prY tpi7 IT s 4aoms8o, rtT ' 4y6 4cti,, 1 'll ,YdrtUGlCor A ot14 Jo o7i5e to,1J t1 fJ pt,(4 5111 ' s 1SothoAo,AId(1 ( . }y al.....) Fvtrd o1 +/ o4 0 16,4Ilibp,4 t rsttacxr 4oFnd,: t(44 4rN; x )t ?ttlr70wa t0?}1; Fi?,rlltl ;,)te ' ot,l4. `A.04 "dil` ,i1;t.11 I1.'rI) 1 ' 1;5a :suob. ;.,7,it:lat,ltt a, l.t,l u(r;l0l �:1lt►1'1 r).. t '1 F11.)I'),.,I 'w°° I l:t.lial'.i“),,,q.N,t� �;y;„��;��,��;�1�1' P(.41 ' 'lr:q4 fiol I Sri ' 1•I:yWCIO'1, Iy'Ii• �t1 (I1'C;j."1:1i)t,I I l C'? i;' 441 c11LICI C)T t111 tl lil m.i 1.1;'1C»� f.7 'j., ,r;�1 H " l} �;�►1,14'l; l ,�1� Gl t,•1; �11141(i1 /� i � t ±rl � tit,'?4A Jo alt. 1 ;1 '1 / 1 i•1'/12) Id tai s tic)UI�:111t ICittl•G �. i fi«. 'P? � r ,•,,? s r,1��1;)�,� ,� .,, , :1. ;:�, � „ , ��,�� '•��i. t�l �'C'1�11'i� 1�'r�,trl��l ><;a�•�;G1iil ��r:1��7� t>�.;�i 0t,l 0F5 ' I l 111 i:'1.'C$41 i'1$ ')isl''I,:11 c1,A ',j.l,o,4,WCI O't 11;•;11;) o41$. `tt:?IocIo,ali;l rlxlrl.l„ ,4D04 ca,r#ti?I'11;)s 0Q0'0e' Rcl :01'11,Ical)Q l'Ii 11/ •, UO '5l,l'41;)r1 II(;1 1.44.sl)'U I.' f,')tr17 (�., '1 T r , , „� i ,��. l.'Xr' ,,,Il.c�l,l,.l, l,at;lU?C;l;C�� 1:1..1. i,)t.l'1:;,,�1Gll'),.IC.1 ;3.'1 `r1,.,160 4o51')4 01.14.' rn /1,�RXIa,4c1 C1� ;rnb ,1 QO�'M f X11' �)do0 3 l,)i);11'1;)�.►,.I al,4, t, �:1"'� 1;)�it'tl,.dl'l f. �, I.Li � 'goo C"I; i, r '1' � , 4`'011' 'i)ti;Ci?1.;,r,,�:1 s Ci?' �)t, td l,} a s l "1 1 i C ► O c:1;a,,) y s )r)1"C, I C,s t v? t 1t:1'1:1.'I:.;1.i1'1 ! i'� � �� >={��,�l7� 1��Y ;f, (:1'. >�i? ;>.1;,l,l;�,� l�ia;�,�i ,J }„ 1;a i, 0t.I1 riil 412t.14 LIl t.!'j.' 40*;;1U.Illllr;?Gl' l;ll,l ' O 4604 1t 1..)o4ohbo,.4 U01 `7 1as nt _ . :. 'ponpo4,1 o q t'a a:.,,1: o t l;l J.r1 *d1 I �a t.l�1 ,1.>.�1 t:1.1, E.,u 14 'o ri l;I)I (RI�r.;>.�I:^i. a d, >�► i1,•,1.'�i ul rj r)s; t,,.l trl►"�a a li;l.,..l a�;l�a,�l ra j;at,t;� >„or a'il o) ,' 1 ,s 2cl ),.d .t4 � °• ) '„11� C r 1 , ;,:I a( MU � stAbOo fi•L v'hx.111 :t,fl T(a,1 11;J J A'iu1 )lrar),,14 rau4 . 07. 0111 1.a,apt,lr lllttll;:►;)o,,11 sr?n) .Uu1.:1.;),os; ,L{1t1(�")11`?C, ;1N 7 a r ya a. l t1 t 't „1 1 t.j 1, 1.{.1. r�„i t'1•� r.. a e1;� l,I C1 l...1.wa Ga I,to is w a It rld 1 rat.a 1,d C:1. l l.(,1 t.►t'1'Gl 4 ',rI''J1;)1:t.11. °(;1 tIC1T:j;1C1;;r ,lt,lr•1lLI0nr:?cl 01441 „ 4 7 s t r � ,.t t.l..l ()c)„1.,.i.�x;71'1 c:1�'�1;? «�,1117G1 iii,. li�itr('l,,rl o 0 t,l'1:6t.f it 0(11, ) (tIhlO )'i'" .tllr? 11.il')'1 't ;"CIYI i1r?>ri 1 �., ) x) 11;iri C1 1 " " 2tti 1'C. � . .� i'. , 1l ,. .1.>.�l !;r�?��,,, j: ��. �,;1 L��,� t.. 1;)ta t�,��ia�;�..a i;{ :cal-0114, „I t"1 '�.d 4�"1.1,.I r�tl t'1 4p 6.•I°1•f5t, p fi d r?1.1'1'1111, �),�.h i 011 lO i',1 1 t'. 1 C:1 1 t11 i ' a Q ,'l: I 1. �c., i�.: ��t,i ',�, ;�. �i 1'1 c•,� r�r,la;a n ((1��•1 1�`'. I';�( �'1a tt"I',,a,,;c�11 f1,i';'Ilit"I' ;;1 k l"�II1 l c:1;'1 (' l,J ti? ttt,.,i i,� l"1:1 It):';t:Iia u„�I L I I I,I, '0(4,',1. L t t:►I•)t.I 3 ij ' f lO a c q n s „;a1VO WOd.J 886T !,t' ,:10cittlra7.00S 01%00: filjurl;tuwQ3: g..I0 . 0J TO 'iii t�.��W P3 :01 NOO 12IQ 'Q� I,J. :JO AL ;O WfOmOWN a k I . or q s r ' v..,...„.1,,.N.-. .w:L,. ., - ., . ..<, ..... ,V.,r.„., ..,V ...-....♦..........w� ,., m ..e,.,. ..............AF.._r, . „ra.._, ..«w......✓- ,... .Vl .,.t...A:.wv...V..lx..,....,..v.,l.,.........1..,..a.,.,..,.a4dr,,..•'..V.:w.Ya,A.....,..v...r...., rr ...-- _.,.,- ' ^Y. r I 1. Memo �4 e Memo to Ed Murphy Skourtes Appeal .. September 2, 1988 :\: • Page z I The stre et widening and pavement conditions proposed by staff are typical conditions of development in Tigard. The hearings' officer adopted the recommendations of the engineering staff in her final order. appealed the requirement for s "reet improvements as a . y ends that the property t owns rs were Mr. John .�kour^tes has anal c,. g condition of development. Mr. Skourtes that C p !t P-sur`c d by the City in 1982 that the pavement section provided by the LID was �sdequate for industrial traffic, and that the property owner: would not be ' required to provide additional street Widening until the remainder of 74tH Avonue was widened) and improved. Our review of the 1982 LID records and Council minutes has riot revealed evidence of such an agreement or promise, • � On August 26, 1988, I raised this question with Frank Currie who was Public , Q, Works II Director in Tigard in 1:582, Mr. Curr^ie's recollection of the 1982 discussions is different from that of, Mr, Skuurtcs, Mr. Currie recalls that the pavement section constructed at the request, of the property owners was , less than that recommended by the engineering consultant and the encji.rtecr•inv staff. Mr. Currie indicated that the property owners should have been aware that the improvements constructed in 1582 were not built: to full standards and r'� that additi�nad improvements would be needed at a later date X • conclude that the half—street improvements, including overlay of existing pavetii ortt,l imposed by the hearings officer are typical of site development conditions required in the City of Tigard, The recit.r7 red improvements meins do' not replace the 198,E LID ilitpr ovements but rather?, augment the 1982 improvements • to briirrcy the street to full City standards X find no documentation of any , promises) made by the City in 1982 which would prevent the requirement oP half—street improvements a$ conditions of development in 1988, Therefore, I recommend that the hearings officer's decision be upheld. We have scheduled a meeting with M , w s o t r t e s to discuss his appeal o September 7, 1988. At that meeting, Mr, S kourtes may be able to provide additional documentation to support his appeal,. Any additional relevant information arising from the September 7 meeting will be provided to the Council prior to the hearing can September 12, In addition, the staff recommendation on September 12 will be revised, as 'appropriate, in light of { any information which may be received at r f t r � �. .'ttiri wh;h i it�xy "�' d � the.. M� 7 `'rty or the , I art r+tc..w ni`ctir�rir�t� a` e tr � September � ' Meeting y th se termer 12 Council hearing, I p I , I � I I I ',t, br/6846a r . . ' I I I I e I I ' 1 • P II`` rd.n,Jv e1.W......,,vd.. _ ... .,.W.a...,.r...._x._.I✓.,.,..4... ..vu...•_Wn,,.lt.,. €...l. ., , • •, 11 ':Tr II n �� s 1 /' Syr MORSE B / . rat r , . . ' Corporate Operations _/-6),1 •! '"' of I 9, � September .� l r_ , , ceigiiriiigr.,,p,..... , ,ift,, •� I • • I I , - Tigard City Council '• 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. ; , 14•- 'r�:gd�.d, OR. 97223 . ,G-� I Re: Puget Corp. of Oregon, File No UG. , p � Orr,:, . SLtS�S•-I SDR88-12 Appeal Dear Council Persons: Morse Bros. Inc. has ownership interests in Tax Lots 1100, 1400, and 1500 (known as the MMercerProperty) on the east side of 74th Ave. and would like to express concern regarding any action the Council may take to limit development of the Puget Corporation proposed expansion. We have found the area to be uniquely favorable for industrial development (i.e. transportation • 4 I access, compatible s lrrounding uses) and would hope the counc;il. would affirm indus w ial development of the area by allowing the' Puget. Corp. to expand. Sincerely, 4, MORSE B • w 'rank Morse President sb I I I I I 16: cc Puget Corp. of Oregon Dan Mercer, Mercer Industries 41 lai i I' , / L I , 34 � i,. Tangent,l OR 97389 0 h670 (SU1,)1.28 fir' 91 �, • I I I I I I I I . I 1 • , . . . . • / r r r r r 1 r r : r r „ r r r r ' • r : r r I ' ' I r r r I r „ r : r . r r r r I r . 2 r 2 r •' ' 1r r I , r r ' r ' r : ' Al. ' r r r ' r r r ' „ 1 r r r ' r r , A• , • l' , ,' :'' „: , „ ' ,,e,u I.1,g ill 1001,4, , , , . 13125 SW, HALL BLVD. r r 1 , r ' r r • P.O.. BOX 23397 , , . . . . , . • ' ' , OR GARD TI 97223 , . . . .. . „ . , ' ''''. OREGON , , 1 . . , , , •.,. , ... " , , , , , , • , , , , , . . .. . . . 1 , . ' D • ' vita11,-sC.---0 : : , , ' - ,r .. TO: ' ; FROM: „ , tt , , ,, . . , , „ • ''' f!+/-1 ' ' ' ' • : , , : , H. ;77--- - . , . . . . , , , , . . . , ,• , , ., - _____,,, r ,,, , . , , . , , , ,, ., .1 . . , . , , .. ' k ' 1 1 . . . . . . . , '[ . „ ' , . „ , , ■ , , , . ,.. , , . .. .. . . . . . .., . . . , - .. . • • • • . 41114.111%.'•..W.;',1V.:f.';'Y4'',';Plii)40f.elt,iM747.17:7,P'.'V"W*,i..7,44,71:1701g, r,V.,Vi.g)af,':Ot;',Nati`+."..:, 01,14;744iP-gt'-', r(•',4"li,1-,'",-.4; '''''ji.,,C,0,,i6.if,i1Vt.'4';'alikl•:;lk"".t1,'Pli''' '7',t'•,..,•;4'.,,..tic:'..IfFj.:'.:1:i'''',5*::if;',:.,:g':1,,,,i:,' .. ,.. . %. ' . ' .' i'V."1,.':,,.,414../1:,.1...,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,„ig,,, : ..41,4•1i,,ec. ,'Ilipt,',,-.1,,:',";,,, A-iwl,k4c4i l'i,f't.;.7,.-,10' '4I.,1k,,';`,'',-,T.,,,',,i'r'',744::',:ii.,1';''',77 'ItY'At8§'Att ,,',1'", it 4.,',i14.1.g? '• ii&or'ii,l;','''''' '%V';74,'.','''''. t.t:2911-4P'',,' ,'A-41".''Q;,,,,:,'•''.,,:.,-;/",s.'''' .,, fi7' ,,•,':'..,,Ii.".*V■tr . ..,:::0-, ,,, 1,0:4,,,,,',.,4,..-".i.- ,. .1,,1-,V,,,,,r,,girt.:7?•"."•:,''. ,.',,,,.ES SA' , ' '','''''L '' ''''T.•:'1''•-"e'',14n",'';"'.''„Am- '''''..'',•,db.'',46'`,.,..4-',":",,,.:.,,,Ni ',?■!.e'''',., .', '' il,,,,t't,,, Ori_ . ,,'.•"` .;:•44,,2,•-•,.,,,iipi,':,.ii,‘. „ t!.. 0,0,,,..-fri.c...114,4;;-„,,2.4;.,1,A,, ,A,I,;,;,,,;„,,,,,,?..„,..,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,. , ,1,..;;.„; ,,,,,, ,;,,,,,,,...1,; „,;.;,,,.;, '•..',1L.,,,,::;111,iY;"..17.;f0,7!':`,4',;,:ii,k•i,),ylalri.,',0:X.■',Y,.:4•.'i'''••'',,''-'."''',,,''l•';''''',.,''''''',-:•-•'''''r; -' • . I' ' ,.,7' ,..',, , ,,.,..,r.'-', .,'„?-4."47,',.:,!!'.0.”^X '''',,".;-'!"c-!!' ', ""'"!!",,,, 4k Cr-,,.'r!!i'4 l'iNr:lpf`,","--t;tl''.14'!'51,,,l,',,',",',$',4413 I:1:4;i%!4;',1!,' ,!',.: ,,1 '"'""',,,'' '-,-';'. ! ' / !!'.',1';''.!', '' '(,,,, '„',',;ni-Vvn!,ft,"$'4" P.-n'','" ' ';?' '1.ny'2,4'''' 1;2'''.,t!,?-.1,'1'1?-,'.;,',',f,,Y;!"-:: :!,..',": "?,J,V,',„:',,,j'',:::.'r ,:!!■';,'.;',44.,',C!,!,11i-:?y,fni!kt,i,':i ;','.,,!'' '.;!''';' " ''!‘''-;J!' '!,!'n• ' ! . ! '",,;„,,,L,,,...„,,,;,..,...,,- ....,!:,,,"',!'-.-•,.!',-'1,! !;'.;.....!.,, ,,"-!■!'!!:',_4.,','4,21,t'n„r.i... ,!-I,i'.214:!-,4_,...1:1;..,4:;:. - -' '-'14'- '!'4,, ! !;',..'.,,,.L.„...!. L..,:,L 41, „...,11,.■,,,,..n.,!!....,:,..!,.....:.....„ ......,,,i;, „ , !-.., ,• 'r:',47'r'r'l:''',:'.:('''';':::''';'r:'''':i..1'' ..L''''..': :'''''''''''L':'''..'kir':.1';'".'‘.1-1'''''Ir ri'M',N,':I!'1‘.::'''...,:,'„',,,,'..11 ..,, ,,,, :,,,t,T=irqgw.,wr---------:,..-(:;,',4),',:,,,i! ,..':„:.,,.::-....*.v,,;:;•:,ki.:„;.,. ...::,.„'.!.,,.:1;:::,;.,;',', :.'..v:;:z4,','I',',-',,!);'H,I,'"..„,„'.,,:.`;:.,`,; ,,,,,,,',,'. ,,. , . '''' • .• ' '',.:,';,'''.!-,''.',,:,,,':,- ,41.',. .!:--,,:i..,:i.'',7''‘.''"r 4.'r.':',r'rL.;:r i''''',':' 'r''',r".. ''.'.':',.'''''''1r,',VAlr'0 I'''''''.'''',''''..''''t''''rr'2:::i'.'''''''''1,*''''''',:.,•,10,%,•,., ,„ .„4,,,,;-,,I,,., ,- ...,, , ' ' • „ , , , 1),j1= , ' :•'''*:'''''',-,'•'' '':'' • C-,. '' • ' ' • -4E.LLSIZI'S.L± ''' It. ,b' • ac*?i'Ti•'14t> '' • ' ' •.....0f-L.L•4-1.... g • ' • ''''• •• - ' • • ' - '' ' , ;"':,'•''':•'-''•,',•'''' ,•:'• -.,•''''''''..; ';','',•,,! ''';',::.' • •,'.'','" • ' :•'',",1,''''H'''''':'''',,'',';';'''','.'"',•':-4;'•'..'':!! ;;'•-•'''•'''',""Y,'",',,- '‘'-',•',.:-:','';''.',,,,',,':',,';''',"-.'":" :'' ',''''',, ,•1,-,..".'",'.,' '-:., i, -: ''', ' ,, „'.',,,,',..,:-.'''',,,,:,'''''','' ,;..,,, ' ,'',,, ' , .. /'.,''.,,. r'' '''' : .-,-':' 7"' A ". , . ..1':....... ,'.- '.. .'' '' -,..A :,. .';',4L : •': ' 'i 'il:S____4=e,MCZ , , , . * ' ' :. I.,1'. .)5› - ' : ' ' ' : : . '. ..... ......... ..... .. ... r 1 r " ' r r r r ' r r 1 L r r r r ' r ' ' ' ,7-1+, , • . . . . . „ . . . ....-.........--.....,:........L..,.,.,.--: • -- , :! •,,!: ,, •!:. .,,,,,, ''' !:• :''-:,,,,'' ,.-, :!.L..', !:,-,,!',:',,,,::',:,,,,.,:.:,,I,'::•,•!,,,,!,,'',,y;', . ..,.',,,'',:',y.;,,L•.:,, :.•,, ,•,.!,,L',': ,' :'A .: '' ' . I I , . . . , , :, 08,:.:L..,*'I 1 .=. • ',.........................,,,.......,......... ....d '• L ....t'r • ''' . .0 •' r. ,,'' .■ r"' ..1..-;. Lm...__i_,..lj„.., ,'„ . ' .t,-'2'-,;:1: r...'':,,.,,',,: r'•r r•, z..'i'-•,: v' j 6' rr L ,'4, ,I / • 1 • , . , ..).,r;,,,,i,Tri i-4.,,, :. ,:'.,,...,,.,,', ■,,.,,.;,,, .,...i.i1,,,..,,..".,,,'.,,,;,..,,• ..f,i,,,:,,, ,',,:,,),:,...,,,,7,,,, ,,,.y,. .,,,!,.,,,,,,,„.,,,..,-,,.,, ,-,,,,,,,,,,:,,,',:,,L.,,,,,.,....-.,, r-„,-,%,:',.,.',.,':',..,.:,,.'4,'',',.•':,7..,..- 1, ,...40012,.. i:i ,:ef:,,..' 1;141(.4',;,,,i.',4,' ,, .to„;1.,ir ,..,),+,gl!,r.,C. ,:rigai , ,,.A.:.;:41, ”' 4,•,''''.,, ,,'40 •"" -'." ,,IF,t:','$)'•• ...•,.i,l', it,C4:'„'.' ''' 4' ';;.,i.1,,A.•)I, • , ' ! . . . :,..0,L:,' N ,' ''' ?.':','.•1!!(,'"•#', :'-`,`,, t :',i';'::,,..44?"2,i";:,,,';';:i',,:'r t'il:.::1,..t11 i.,„i i,,,t:',,!;;;:',„,.;'::',?;.,,,,,,,','''.1,,:::`7,1,.:44,j,it,4,,:,;:-;,2;1;,;-;;;,,,'.:,''J,,F11;;;',','*:,;..,..,...',''i.',.'',.:.".i.,,t,t,;':'.':?, ?',',il'',':.'','i.',„'':-:;',:,i;q;,.','':,'.,,,V,,-4.:.4,‘;'1i,?;-,‘.:,''';7,',:,',,',D','..'iRI,;.,.'1.?t,:,,t';4;;:fi,4,i;,;;"i 4;(,:li'lt,irf' 4.. 5 4, , . , . . ' , ' A ,....-i,, , ': '' , 0 -7 ).4.7 r- t /,)„: Al-r-1-4;,:i./c.,' .,,, tt,$) , . ,. , ........_ , , . . . . . ., , _ _......._ ,, L. • ,. : ,t, , 1 • . . , .,_......_._.........■.■.......,....i......,..,..... .4 ' n , .. 'NEI), ' . '' ''', , .', ' h ., , , ' ' . ' , : , : '1 " ' ' .' , ' :" bATE .-• 1 . ,, : 1 PLEASE RETURN dill NAL,COPY WITH REPLY. k''EP,PINK COPY''rOR 'YOURI:IECCIilbS.' , . !. , . '',L'': ' ':' ' '::'' '' ' ': ' : : :: , '1.1H ' '' ' '' :' • ' '''' ' ORIGNAL , 1 /• • • , ,,, . . - . • • September 9 , 1988 r , Mr. Keith Liden, Planner City of Tigard Planning Department 13135 S. W. .fall, Blvd. Tigard,igard., 0R 97223 Re: Puget Corporation g p anon Building Addition Dear Mr. Liden: This letter is to request a delay in providing the dedication of the 100-year flood plain area and the right-of-way along ' 74th avenue until the site work is completed. We will not ' be able to provide an accurate description of the flood plain ,. at this time. Puget Corporation will agree to make both dedications a condition of the occupancy permit . As you are aware, it is very important that we proceed with construction, which is now held up pending issuance 'l of the • building permit. /, . . Thank you for your attention to these details Sincerely PUGtT CORPORATION r, Geoff Levear President k. CL/c ' I r e ' �u��1,� ��t✓U to d;�b y.t i.f.v�✓.�m.sv 44 t�l w., �r �'�_t ro'{;�r�l�f� 4 l�u i��. I }} ' • September 8, 1988 7235 S.W. Bonita Road Tigard, Oregon. 97224 I I .. Ji' , '.� ^^„']t;T; �*I^"Y" r n •r N`+,.Y � wwv '��•, .1,tf•,. '+oSI t.-7 r. � rrl�',v, .# I,k,'G,I ''..+rI a,es� {,�,ti -�L,,�.r ,. I' �' .i'.' ;,�:a 3 ��. L I ! '�' j,.4ar+1•.: !.. 'I� �� k May f,e .,r,. I A7 ...s->•..-,..Lnu,,,.., �.,..M,13• �Y �'r'� 1 �, ,�p e S ,•,-.d.a �-_,+q J '6♦ .�C•°. -� r. •n � .',4� ,...•- .:S7L,,..M.•.. .,.r,,,,, ,,, ,,,,,,y...,-. �.A ........., ,..�., ;,I.,:I.: ,,iM.tS..�.♦,a....:4;�m':q.e,twtr.:,S1:4Fidert.aN4r+:�5w�' w .fie.,�t .iC. ..� x�t.'.d�.. ..0 t�.'.I v� ;_QRL? 1,:.1�'.'i e,W,ry ,Ctli�: ;�,,V»,!t d, �� Mr. keli th Biden City of Tigard Planning Department 13135 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Be, Puget Corporation a . . Proposed Bldg Addition 1 , Dear; Mr. L iden, s you requested in our telephone conversation on September 7, 1988, lam providing the following information. 1) We would like to remove the 2 apple trees along the south property line. Both trees have disease and dead limbs , which l we feel will be a future hazard. In addition, the Y failing fruit will be a nuisance every year. Since these trees provide very little buffering to the site I feel that their ` removal will not have a significant impact . Until you have I 1 considered this matter we will act to protect the trees during iI construction. We intend to rope off the area prior to grading of the parking area. We do anticipate some root damage when (, the storm drainage line is installed along the south property line. 2) Regarding the parking lay out along the south property ' line; it will remain as shown if the 2 trees are removed. If we must save the trees, we will then remove' 4 parking spaces to allow for the tree wells 3) In regards to the lax dscapino plan, the City of Tigard , , minimuM Standards and requirements for plant sees are assumed. • I ! n L IIyI �l w� tt it • • Page 2 • "C � k�ra;'t "epternber 8>r 1988 Mr; KeithLirde • .,,.V r t .,.y ...1. in... _�.. .Kw M.vrr,,r q mr,�. Uv .`577,. .' arr `� j" rt ', y. r, .t+rrA' ' .� � i'�srr; xx .5�t �r,_ w-' o-�^��. • ,, I ,, q uf�F' 4 e r'A 4 ! ' ' +4�r 7 I• yWr ��5J t Ya �'M 'c 1 } �}�, �lk f , . ( '4�'�N .I "...t 4, � ,r.. {.y lr , rA ..j, -l.` ,1 ,...1 57' .� ' i ' ""=1�. �' .,K ' . k f�� :?. ,C,'W 61'�R�'h "�' ,t."'4_ r••,��r �" � 7:.'r �,i,rs.', � '�t. , r � i i�'. i i 'a r .r.,.�l` Y•��.» C ,il.F .a.A i c..,�'r'}, is4, (r°. �li,t, �r',r.uy". s., 'i .� � .,MmE•.�,�r.:,,r�n+.Uu..,c...n, ..gar,..,.«.......�.,�,_ a..............w ....�.. .�..., ... .,,�.., .,., .!�.�.,-�}r«F._,,,,.. .:'.., .,u... 1 ".i. .t 1. .a.;'�:: }s.r' �r �r '¢.t5r'. _r.h. _ 'a.J,n,.,r ..;.u+...M �.�..v .,�f.�.m'.FVN,,..4.i•..w m-'Ww,l",�.,Ivw:�Aa��.,nh«i,�l.+,,n�'r�`�.,{r, t h.�� I,MI k(9 I C,i,n� 1 .�i�F. r�a 4) Two new handicapped 'parks g spaces will replace two • • existing' spaces in the north parking lot on Bonita Avenue. The site plan for the improvements does not include this area on the drawing. If additional drawings are needed, please let Ate know. Thank you for your a t t e n t i o n to this matter. • Sincerely, SABRE CONSTRUCTION' COMPANY • John E Boutinen Building Consultant • JJEB: j s' • >r- , REErt :' o AU 2 1988 • • 4nun144t6\ • *11-114iggiaLlk cirt OF fi �.. OREGON August t 1 1988 s The hearings Officer decision for Puget Corporation (Case No. SDR 88-12/ SL 88-02) was appealed by John Skort :s because of the public street improvement requirements imposed as conditions of approval. A hearing before City Council has been scheduled on September 12, 1988, to review the appeal. ' It is agreed by Puget Corporation, John Skortes, and the City of Tigard. Community Development Department that the street improvement questions is an issue separate from the development of the Puget Corporation property and that grading building permits � radin and buildin ermits can be issued prior to the resolution of the 'gym i appeal. The design' . approval and completion of street improvements (as required by Council) shall occur prior to issuance of occupancy permits. ACNNO ILEDGED Genf 'Leveat, President Jo rt . Skottes Keith S. g en Puget Corp. of Oregon Senior Planner , x cc': brad Roast Randy, Wooley A 13125 BW HON Blvd, RO,Box 23397 Tigard Orogon 97-�23 (503)639- 171 ' ,Ih.. :rY........,,,..♦na, ... v._,,.mow ,. ,.. .. ..W.i,.,. .,.,. ..,.,,,,,..,.......,. _ ....., ,,,,. ...,....,..,,, ., . .,.. .._ , .. • • rt- �� ,„, � ‘‘, Au C z M4. Mo nL e y City Admini4 ka ;on City 0,6 TL:ga.d� P.O. Box 23397 TigaIcd, Cnegon 97223' Su,bjec.: Appeat and on neopen, hears.-.ng� Cake namben 88-02 and 1` 8812 1, Dean MS. Mo n. ey: r:. PAi0A tO a heaA4ng date being zet we woc' td tike a meeting with a p pno pnx.a-te zta to compane ..n,4 o and a44embLe a comp.Ce to necond of the 74th LID. Pun pone oA thiz keque6t wo t.Qd enabte uA j oLnt:ey to p :ov .de ,AaU Lnokmation to City Counc.it 4o they wilt be able to make a 6a-Lk equ,itabLe deci4 .on that usexvez the community . ntenezt stneene.e y youx�, o n R. S .oakte 170£0 S.W. WJe. n Rd. 1 0 Beave) ton; 0hegon 97007 copy -toe ban Menceh Ge.o6 Levean� � � • • A i .,._,v,.,..„,..,...................t., .., -. ..,.,. „..._ ...,, .,c,.. .s.u*--......,..,..,..-........ ..,t.,,_.,...+_,« .... .,.,..tu. 5i.».,,,..r,»,..., .w,,..-,.....-.,w,....,..... ...-.,,,.w,,..«...«:.E,,...-J1.t.,...1.....r..1'.V,.+,..«.,.Wiw .,..,J-'.,...... . ,. ..»,. (ti DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY • ;� T , ;Jti ,� TLAP+fo DISTRICT. y i CORPS OF ENGINEIr ,,.. P.0.SOX ?948 ° q 1.111kP0' Pf PORTLAND,OREGON 97200-2946 �- Reply to °•►rr•• Attention of: July 26, 1988 Planning Division (CENPP-PL-RP) Subject.: 071-OYA-4-005433 (Fanno Creek Proposed Bank Protection) Mr.Mr. Geoff Levear Puget Corporation r o aton 1 7440 SW Bonita Road' Portland, OR 97225 Dear Mr. Levear: This is in regard to your July 5, 1988, written request for a determination if a Department of the Army permit is required for the placement of rock along the bankii.ne of Fanno Creek. Based on your Engineering drawing (marked Puget Corp. , Grading & Drainage Plan, dated. June 21, 1988) , it has been determined that the proposed fill would be shoreward of the ordinary high water line and would not 'impact a wetland. Therefore, a permit, is not required, 1611.L. If you have any questions, lease contact Ron .Piar at the above Y Y q P g , address or telephone (503) 221-6995, Sincerely, l3 ron R, 5lankensh /' Chief,'Chief, Permit Evaluation Section Copies F'uz<nished, ,, ODSL w/ent1 William A. Monahan • L . t Jam, r♦ 1r 9 n r • gf. • S • "R..,,. TRANSCRIPT 1 SL. 88-02/SOR 88-02 PUGET CORPORATION June 8, 1988 and July 6, 198 • Beath Mason This is June 8, 1988, at P;00' p.m. We're in the Tigard City Hall, "Town Hall Room, this is the time set for the regular agenda for the Hearings Officer, My name is Beth Mason, I'm the Hearings Officer for the City, At my left is Keith Liden, he's the Planning staff representative. We have one item on the agenda tonight, that's and 88-02, request by Puget Corporation of Oregon { for Site Development Review and a Sensitive, Lands Review on property zoned Light Industrial, : have reviewed the staff report and the attachments that were provided, Do :L see from the audience the only people here are the r ' applicant and your .p _scziatxte? � y inclined to approve the staff re p t subject to the conditions found in the staff report, unless there is something that you'd 1 i ke a';.o add Or comment on. (Unidentified person) HEARINGS OFFICER Okay, fine, why don't you come forward, (Unidentified person) • Y Y , i I'm an attorney in Tigard I'm working with Puget, Corporation Ors have submitted to Y i , , permit , parking facility, The, rYecommmndationi from staff Y Y , Y through Y : Y , not represent a problem except , Y Y through G except i Item a, some Y Y , , that are standard procedures for the City of Tigard' f president of Puget Corporation has , . , i historical information . , Y years ago standard that was a little lit ; i standar ds , . standards bc taantaired. through c do not present a problem,' Item h , _ division of the , Y s .4 rY area• Y i . t to meet i , , Y �r 1�1�.fat'' Y i i l systems on the west side 'of northeast ra<�� k�r g ai �.a problem y 1 , the building. + 0 Y Y Presently there is one HVA system i i Y' i creates some noise 1 level , Y 1 Y high level of noise respect, that 1 f 1 1 of the i 4,Y'i problem. , i registered to the City or to Puget' Corporatioh, + s , from the neighbors, i Z A S l l ( 8� lyy j 8 U 7 12 PAGE 1 • • 4 , . r • 1...»......._.., '...,-,,.. - - - '.n .,i a.. ,' .r.«...i........,._.-.... t .._..-..s^.,N'.......,. ..,,.,. _......—.. ..-.-I i.a w....... ....•, ..•... .......... .....,.»...,,..., . .,,..-.. • • • f ` Neighbors directly' A , company are . . , 100 feet froli, the building . , i , feed is the r.anno Creek and . the 100 foot point . , Terrace . 175 feat . . residential i . . that he proposing. . . . . directly along with the noise barriers on the sauce side . deciduous plants there, the idea of some . - nal• I evergreen; in . i . . really again .". and finally 6 item I have talked with I both Keith Lliden and Gre g y a ire rr• about they City's requirements on dedication. Apparently the 1984 . staff recommendations the property . , . . we don't really have a problem on today. To 'make , . however 'there's' been another piece of property rear of the property -7 . .I where Puget is . . . proposing to use . . a . . arid 45 percent property . from the . , . , natural state is the i , . . river meanders closer to •, corning past the point: . , . . current. the river . , , be on . when the company has i . , . created a flood plain . . , , some flood plain land by commercial and industrial development: . . , specific' area such at the 74 io be. an , , , to ; talked to IGreg . . . , one piece of property determine if a there is development +�, n potential and if►� a oar' ; . ', , the City in straightening out al r p u the y °� stream. Greg . . . , approval to a agencies involved so I don't have « « N any definitive answers , , with us , . . think that, the City's i . courage a private property owner in an industrial area to I'm Jeff~ Lave:ar, president of Puget Corporation 1 stay ► ith the . , ; . the way the creek does meander and where we are talking about future 'possibility we would want to do that and participate in that l assuming that the as Bill said the wetlands could be moved also i . i to have some more usable land for the future, The area t ha t we're talking about ;rtr aigtoning it out has already been created as a spillway , wetlands to expedite the i , . through I. that area ,,, Y to and I'm not familiar with all , , • , legal hurdles went Y w w through to do that , . , , wha'r it would mean eventually , . , deepening the spillway that has already been created and make that the . . I.°anno Creek. a 1 i + , , current er�t lour ae« , . . , other comment in regard to the , , , . corporate r,xtxzenl, on that site since 1969 , . , resident of , though our name l'tends to confuse people that we're! , J ,' are actually i i 1 i last year been awarded . . i Commerce , i , i companies , , the number of people that we've hired in i past year we have i , { i on a list honorable mention for the second year in a row , , / , again , . l and creating jobs , iii having watched the history of this prer"' over a long period of time and made an aggressive effort to provide jobs and to grow the status of that company to a world i i , , company status Tl /'1NVryCRII T sL\Ir✓—o /y Lw s V •;C1 I PAG 2 • I r I • I've noticed that th`„, flood' plain issue is a moving in the area but , • 1964 . . . , . and at that time there was discussion abut . . . . rules got changed . . . became somewhere else and allowed us to build . . . . built in 1984 , , , my • next 10 years or so may be a whole different set about the if we were to dedicate floor pI lain area to the CiI t y I it might exclude future come back to the issue of the , . ' � � half-.street improvement we aim to propose this . I, could essentially uh sanction using the . • as wry USaCI our 84 project . the . . . . improve that , accommodate Mercer Steel manu'facturing facility ; . . . concrete in that area and we're planning on heavy duty trucks on that road. At that time it was la matter~ of record in . , • those LID hearings the standard was cut back I becau s e all parties agreed, including the City, that that particular adequate , . 84 curbs and sidewalks widen that road and we same criteria as the, I nc, l~.;CD used. Now we're being Iasked to upgrade: that standard substantially and in my opinion; as mechanical engineer, it would has it's an ' , I a m ��l "rteer; y.t poor engineering , . , , d change that standard of part of that street, plan as submitted calls for asphalt on 3/4 rock , half rock is very adequate and matches the standard of the rest of that in that half street improvement language of this may b� standard language but . . record I Ware, to make sure it's, understood . , streetlights and underground utilities are not part of what Puget is going to . . . . and I don't believe expects,s, uu r plan lights are already in place and I don't think . . . , underground uti"ities in for 100 � � + . on a ~ street where there underground ut.a r e ' .yet; wf•t,a i ~hi�r�� arcs no undergr��au ~' hies, I , . , half street improvements make intended to a those change outlined we can proceed on providing that half street improvement , , , , plan, , couple of comments with regard , . on the apartment side of , . fair amount of landscaping, trees, and ! such , , '' ;')rriea • , . facility. . terms of the st�hiittit:tc the of t landscaping o submitted. I h 'la plan , - meets the requirements y . , , very interested in having a good looking part of our . + � , ar customers - ' � is whieht customers show up, US or �'apar•it:. 3� they are impressed with our appearance so s , . to . + , ; and we will ' will „ , . landscaping, as part, of the . . 1 4 comments I'd be happy . , . Oe1{Nt Let me ask the staff a couple of questions first. keith, on the LID criteria of the earlier development of 74th Avenue, do you have any information ofn that !. I I I � ' . I TRANSCRIPT $ 88 M 0, SO( 88-12 I i PA d •1 I I, r• I'm afraid I don't. Um,. it certainly would be public record and we could we � �� .; could get that information forwarded f of w, ,,d t=o you before you made a written decision, if you want us to do that. I . Beth'; Monahan did you bring a copy of that LID, the standard? Monahan No, I was unaware , , , , this meeting, Beth Okay, I'm going to need to see a copy of that standard, From you remarks ks a t • appears that was art interim standard. The question is what's interim? Have i we reached the end of the interim, is it time now to develop to the ultimate , development standard? And that's the question that's before me. Um, and I would need to see what what direction the Council gave on what interim moans, How long do they want to maintain that standard, and at what point in time dd, they want to bring that standard to the regular street standard, II . Second on the noise barrier for the air conditioning system, what's the staff's thinking on that? I've never seem a noise requirement before .j Keith Well, we have we have two different references to noise in the code, One talks about the fact that the City will uphold DEt ' s noise abatement:. criteria, So I guess I would view that as bottom lime that you have to meet DEG? requirements for noise for night time and daytime,, Aio on site development „evieW of criteria, wo have tome I'd guess I'd call it,, more , subjective language about buffering and noise and so forth, talking abeUt a l compatibility between' different typos of uses1. the example ho'e being TRANSCRIPT SCI IPT S'L80...O2/SClt 08-12 httt t 4 A T'F,: - ` industrial and resid' ,...ial. When I was out on the si..e during the day when x was over at the apartments, the air conditioning unit was definitely audible and it was my feeling, given what we have here in the code, that providing some kind of a noise buffer would be appropriate I would, I would agree with them that probably during the day, background noise of traffic and other , things' going on it may not be much of a problem, however, the requirements are for 0E9 are more stringent in the evening hours Beth So regardless of what the city did, DEQ could step in and require them to, , • usually DEQ only responds to a complaint, but they could step, in and require some noise abatement measures? Keith That' s true, or the City could also Beth a And there haven't been any measurements taken to determine if it's a problem? • r !. eital , Not to my knowledge, no 1 4 (some background talking that gets lost) Beth L And the landscape buffering on the west side of the bul.ding. X don''t quite 1 i understand the disagreement that we have between staff and the applicant about ; evergreen versus deciduous, What's the, what's the objection here? 1 mean, what' s the reason for evergreen and why are you opposed to evergreen? transit. + , (�.es1., in t.� ansat< somewhere) TRAI\ C?IPT SL 88-02/8DRt 88-i,?' p Ct' 5 V' . S li i 1h , A ar�jt... . ., .,..,..' ...... ,• ............. ......... .. .,, ., _ ...,..,. ,,.,. ... „ ..•-....,,., . u, +ti .. r • Beth What the staff position on that? Keith Well,. 0 Beth , The purpose of the screening is what? � (background talking Keith It should w it' ll e on , k�� on a a,1'; :i. 1 ,tin � whit: . �.�,x�."/� sheet should ��a�� in there also, 8eth ; have it here Keith I am looking at the policies in the plan and site development review criteria that do talk about trying to provide some buffering and screening. The building is a metal industrial building, it's fairly sizeable, I' don't I know what the height is but it's, what would the height of the building he about 20 some feet' • (someone) lb foot le feet, And, the wall in I guess, well let 's see, looking, you have the it plan before you I don't remember how long the wail is going to be total, hu uh looks like it will be Approximately 200 Pee t long, And the idea of the screening is really to make I;anno Creek a desirable area for the wa;�r gr��_en and TRANSCRIPT IPT SL88 �02/S g'B� 12 � P fir:~ • a 1.1 A N s 1 (1, " • • ' . • • r achieve the purposes'•...f the greenway for eventually Luing a walking trail and ;{ : so forth, and again to provide for a more compatible relationship between the industrial use and the apartments, just provide some visual break. The ' • evergreen landscaping was suggested because you would have some, visual buffering that would be would be of some definite ([benefit year round, as opposed to deciduous trees, which of course are going to lose leaves during part of the year,' Most of the vegetation that lies between the building and , the creek at this point,'' are blackberry bushes, Primarily. , and then c there is some vegetation on the other side of the creek that's near the apartments. So there is, there is some in the flood plain, but. Beth Do I read this map correctly that what . •the applicant is proposing are the ' p .� r�r �? � } ones, the weeping willows? (background) j,'. ( And I'm h:r.ving a difficult time orienting this map to the now building, the t shapes don't seem to correspond. Is this section, this section' s the new , • • building (someone in, background) Yes, that would be the I r. Beth You just want them away from the building? the red maple though is existing? kai lih I e • i Laa/ear TRANSCRIPT I w 888-02/SBR 88-u.1 PA38 7 I I • • If the object is to screen the new building, and the applicants proposed five new trees that would essentially screen' the existing building, what about this area down ih here? Keith Well, think that's the part of the reason for the suggestion that there be a revised landscaping plan that provide a little more screening along the entire length. Meth Pid you have some ree,4,on you stopped the landscaping at that juncture of the the edge of the new building? parking instead of extending :r.i, to 'th g� 1 .. (background noi. distinguishable) basically . , . / sloping area setai And there' s no equivalent bank to the creek side of the parking area? :. (Unidentified ntifie d p ersor ) And where is your water pump in relationship ti" Your red maples? And even though, you've said you don't want deciduous, oh you don't, wani deciduous next ; ' to your water pump, but you don't mind having it next to your bux)dzn g, a.a long as it's not hear your water pump, Correct? La v e a h" 1 i i 1 s u 7 BO tlt • keith, do you have any Problems with making the ones someithing that's • � y y p g u ANBCR'.1Cp p" Sp ##8••-02 8bq 88-12 PAGE 8 • �1. • I evergreen, they're �..gge s L in g Doug Fir, and then Lo&tiing the that span �� • . about, it's not quite the full 200 feet, it would probably about 150 feet, with the deciduous that's next to the building? It would provide some visual break in the winter time, but it wouldn't be uh (background) Beth • Who used the greenway? Eventually that greenway is designated for a park like use with 'bicycle trails and natural, I recall, isn't that? We usually require i • dedication of that of the flood plain with the ultimate idea of there being a bike path through there, and a park like setting for the, people through there. z But the idea is the visual the people that are using that you're, the question is, do we create a tunnel 'effect where we have you, know, or a canyon effect of where we havo a wall of 'industrial buildings on one side and a wall of apartment buildings on :the other side, or do we attempt to buffer that and make it more of a green I think that's the intent if unde<, stared the greenway. Keith , I Y; s I think also a concern here is, particularly next to the building, the flood plain is fairly narrow at this point, I don't know exactly how +many feet but it's really not that great a distance over to the other side, It's different from the north side of Benito Road where the flood plain is quite wide, You've got a, you know, pretty fair distance that you'd be dealing , . . with Maybe several hundred foot, This is loss than that, so; Retfn r' . • Is there anything else you'd like to add? fi Keith Any questions �b�ut the flood dedication, fo �� plain dedication'? , TRANSCRIPT � S G w • • • • Beth' No, I uh it sounds like you've talked to the City, you've talked to Greg you r t.. said? (Unidentified person) Right. Um, I can think of a way to handle that would accomplish I think both, both objectives without . , , . unless there's Something you want to add about it. Keith, ti guess Um,tct c. n Z u�..ys Both mean, you know, as long the you know we can keep the capacity of the plain + > if they want to reroute it, . > , workable I, keith Yes, I guess the only concern would bF that we have a dedication on oi° at least a portion, i` • Beth I think what I'm going to do, I'm still inclined to grant the application, Okay. So what we're really talking about here tonight are the conditions of • approval, I can't address A until I see the LID standards that were sot when 1 .1, that was formed. However, I will approve the application subject to conditions lb through :j, hi, um, h2 will be revised to read that, the urn air conditioning system located on the west side of the building or roof um, shall meet , ,noise standards. And we'll leave 1t at that, Okay, It has to meet (t the standard. Whatever it takes If it means a buffer, then you're doing to have :o buffer it> If it 'doesn't if it meets the standard A buffer, f , `,� a fr�ard then you won't need a buffer. Um, the landscape buffering along the west side • of the exit>ting building, relying on the applicant's Puget s landscaping TRANSCRIPT T' SL88-02/SI)R ea-1 PA 10 1 I . addition, the site dL,1gn review, I'm going to go ahomd and mark it exhibit .2 g g so we have a reference point, The urn, applicant shall plant evergreens in the f • location of the trees marked 1 on that plan, They' ll, plant deciduous y , vegetation along the balance of the new building. I'm not sure that two rod I maples are going to accomplish the screening of that, building with deciduous, a I i • You might want to intersperse with laurel or something that will provide a little bit more visual screening, I don't think two trees in 150 foot span is going to cut it, so I'm going to suggest that there be a visual barrier along, i. r4 the balance of that building, of some sort of deciduous vegetation, You understand the area I'm talking about? Yes i f; • But that still leaves about 50 feet of that building on the corner that's not being addressed, where your parking stalls end. . . . . couple of trees across the way Oh, I thought he just said he couldn't do that because of the cliff over there. Lavear It' s not light enough for something like a t)ouglas fir, Beth { Right, that would be fine, That would be fine. The idea here is to screen 0 , from view from the greenway, looking up at the building. If you want to put "'. it at the edge of the of either of the parking structures, that's fine, As } long as there's a continuous area from the the uppermost number 1 to the end , ,l of the building, the new addition. Okay. 1 . • Conditions 4, 5, and 6 will be as written. Condition 1, I'm going to allow the applicant some leeway ih redesigning the flood plain and I'm going to give you the gist of my ruling but I'm going to draft the, I'm going to redraft it at my office, but essentially what I'm going require fe yo to record y �:n to 'retar.r�r �: r~u ti. do is ' it's ih the nature of an encumbrance, essentially on this area of land • TR tt11tCRIPT sL.8a--02/B R 80-12 PAM. 11 , • • • favor of the City wH ch will essentially cloud your title to this area until the City either approves a realignment of the flood plain or you dedicate the required, the now required area of the flood plain, At the point that it is realigned l according to the City Engineer's approval and the various other agencies to approve, then that lien would be es tNtat, have t then released, or that encumbrance on that land would be released and you would be free then to apply for development of that area.. But until that lien was released essentially, that area would be encumbered and would not be available for development. In . I that way I want to protect the City's option at requiring dedication of that land but not r r you to , r require u 1.� dedicate it at this time. �x you q y t v�. y the option to relocate that, As I said, that's the gist of my ruling, but it's you know, ' I'm going to have to draft a little more carefully when IX get to the office, Questions? • That would not be the he c e under the language n ua e ihai I'm proposing. Correct.. • • Lavear Talking about two separate : + , , . Both • r Okay, It was my understanding that the northern part had already', been dedicated Is that incorrect? A A 1 1 Lauear I I • I Y e s, . . „ . tO dedication, • I I »'t �t,t. � I I , I see, So well be dedicating the full length 11 of your, of, the property, of • the buildings or of the property, •. LavealN • I I I I I I I I I TRANSCRIPT S »68- 02/SOR 8$-12 PACE 12 I I VV • Keith I • I I 1 The way it was proposed here, the flood plain': would be, in the staff report way d plain would be dedicated from the y it'sl proposed the f'loo Bonita, Road to the southwest corner of the parking lot, and then from the southwest corner of ' the parking lot to the south we were proposing that they dedicate the flood way which is a narrower section, leaving the flood plain till later. They're r indicating that they think they may be actually moving the location o f the • flood way with the, with what they hav e in mind so ther '' • Both r That south section r Keith Right, So I think what you're suggesting for the south, section will be fine. Lavear / i willing to dedicate . i . i staff's got to finish . , . we're going to be planting - - 1 / 1 i . e . /that also that's the support of the slopes / I 1 ■ Both I I Oh, I didn't understand you objection clearly there, 8o you're objecting to ` the dedication of the flood plain at any part of your land? And specifically asking for no dedication at all in the southern part where eventually you're p i• hoping to relocate the flood way, ' I Lavear i i !I • Both • I , It doesh't become feasible? i i And we're only talking abouf the area that I that might be developed in tho future would he south of this his pruposlert I �, addition? Would bee ;,o the flood plain area that the City';s asking for on `. TRANSCRIPT SH8$ C2/a DR $$ I PAGE 1,$ • I I I I I.' I �, . I I • • , M the north is not an . area tha t you might be laa,,a r . at for redevelopment, • you're simply asking to control the area that those trees are in and. . L..avcar . . Beth As to your request to not have the flood plain to the north and essentially • w,e' re talking about as again referring to Exhibit 2, the edge of the roadway .that's proposed north to Bonita Road. That the logical division? Am I. reading this right? This point being the division point? Yes • Beth y. As to that north, I'm going to deny your request to not dedicate the T�ood , plain I think that the ownership of the trees is not a significant l-actor when it's off your your pavement, 1think the City becomes a neighbor just as any other neighbor, and in tennis of lateral support of the parking lot, you . can turn to the City to make sure there's sufficient support, You don't need ownership of the land to coptro'l that. As to the south, I will implemortt the language that X suggested and that is give you the opportunity at sums time in the future to relocate the flood way and thereby the flood plair , because it follows the flood way to some extent. Uh, but in ',:he meantime, there' ll be no you know, development allowed on that property until that's either done or the dedication that the City's already asking for is accomplished, Okay? More questions? No? That's f~iris, that's fine, That' s fine, Well, I'm sorry but you know that's what the flood plain o rdir��LC is for, And��X"m, �: 1 think I'm giving you quite a benefit of leaving you some ?legibility to not require the full dedication but you know, that's what our City Council is for so I encourage you to take advantage of that process, I 1. have my written decision filed within 10 days, Hopefully, et the City's h ;O stuff this week Yeah, he's boon pretty good, about: gottihg getting that over to me, lhat would TRAN8CRIPT sL8a-02/pop 88-12 PAGE 1 � .. • • be the only thing might delay my decision, airy written decision, but generally 1 have it within 10 days. With growth comes the responsibility of accommodating the flood plains, so. Well that's true. That conc ludo s the hoari ng • I'tt/6362D • • , M1 } M1 • • • • • I i I {{ , b 1 T . RANSCR1P r 8L08—02/80R 8e-1 PALL 1.5 OK, I' ll call the me ..„ing to order. This is July 6,' .1,988 at 7:00 PM. We are I • in the Town Hall Room for the City of Tigard.. This is the time and lace set g" p for ,L Officer. M n . I fo the regular agenda for the Hearing's Offs: y antic is Beth Mason, I'm • the Hearing's Officer for the City. We have three items on our agenda tonight. Two of them are announcements s of decisions and one of them is a contested item, The first item on our agenda tonight is the announcement of IT decision and the matter of the application for a time extension and phasing • plan for a subdivision. The applicant waI s Krueger Development Company, case V .:. 8'.87-03 . I see some new fades in the audience that are interested in this. I understand that you've had a neighborhood meeting and I'm pleased to see that t7c neighborhood getting together ether to discus, this is sue, "et me say, though, • so you understand the procedure that we had a meeting' on May 24, , 1988, a public hearing and it was continued for further hearing on May 31, 1988, so ' h we've had two public hearings on this matter. I had originally indicated that I would announce an oral decision on Tune 22nd and failed to do so to the i .. inconvenience of some of you, again, I apologize,' X continued the matter to this •evening, July 6, to announce my oral decision; I do not have extra • copies' of this decision tonight, If you want a copy of this decision together with the appealed procedure,, you need to contact Keith Liden. As soon as I've announced the decision; he'll take your name and address and mail you a copy of the decision or you can pick it up at the City Hall tomorrow with the ! appeal procedure, I will be taking no more evidence tonight. The record is closed. Tonight is the time just to hear the decision that I've made. I'm going to summarize my decision rather than read it since it 's four pages long bi.it I will, in detail, go through the things that I know are of moat curb ern and that is the traffic in this area. I found that Krueger Development Company, the applicant, has represented as part of another development, that • they will build an extension of Murray Road from Wilton Street to, 185th Avenue, I found that an access onto Scholls terry Road at this time is not available for some years because of the lack of right—of-way available to accommodate a left turn lane, But, I find that the improvement of the Murray +' Road extension from Wilton Street to 136th Avenue is a critical outlet for Cotswal.d 4 , While the traffic from Cotswald 4 will then use 185th Avenue until the balance of the extension is completed, that is, the balance of the • Murray road t xttens sort out to Dchol is I=erry,a The Hearing's Officer does not fired that the applicant should participate in the 185th Avenue LID, At the assessment formula has been Set and construction planned for the season, ' On • • I • TRANSCRIPT wL.88"02/80R, 88-12 P AC 16 I i • • • • • • 1 • the other hand, the caring`s Officer is not prepared to place a moratorium on all development on this area until the Scholis Ferry accesses are available . However, the applicant's new phasing plan puts the majority of the proposed ` n single family units into phase 1, leaving only a small number to be developed • as part of phase : 5+ The Hearing's Officer is aware that developing the Scholls 'Ferry, Access in .conjunction with the small number' of lots during 'phase L ' II will be quite cosily to the applicant on a per capita basis but the ,. applicant is assuming that burden by requesting the revised phasing ' plan at this point in time taking the bulk of the development into phase 1+ The applicant cannotaddressing however, defer the traffic p roble m co rn l etely j, until phase 71 is developed. Hearing's Officer finds that the! best use of the' applicant's' resources to address these access problems in conjunction with } . prior representations by the applicant of its intent to develop 'a portion of the Murray Road extension from Wilton Street to 135th is to acquire that portion of the extension now to serve phase I of the development. The i 1 applicant has avoided one assessment, the 135th Avenue L:X;b by its general promise to develop this portion of the extension' and will, by this approval, 1. be deferring another significant assessment for the Scholl:s Ferry access It n is now time for the applicant to perform on it's promises and address the " access problem ob len created by it' s desire to develop a large portion of Cotswald 4 before the Schoils Ferry access can be developed, Therefore, ; approve the t7s • time extension and the revised phasing, x require construction traffic to access onto Schoils Ferry directly during the construction of he improvements as the residential units to the maximum extent i.owed by the Oregon Stag Highway Division. We have information from them on the file that they will consent to a construction access, I require the right—of—way be dedicated on this property along Scholls Ferry Road, I require the applicant to . construction or guarantee the construction x� a acceptable ale t i the he Cx ty Attorney not less than 2/8r+d street improvement to the extension of Murray • Road from Wilton Street to 135th Avenue developing only the 135th Avenue connection on the north Pork. If you recall the map,' there were two entrances onto 135th, one heading north and one heading south, I'm only requiring one I, connection onto 185th at this time to a street standard approved by the '''City! j Engineer and in accordance with the approved preliminary plot of the proposed • Chelford Subdivision, The right—of—way requirement of the original condition for dedication along ,chills Ferry is amended to 45 feet to it is consistent i! wit h the State Highway request and the extension of sanitary sewers is subject . TRANSCRIPT P " w LS8—O�I�a� � l 1� PAGE. • 54,1 b • • A �' to a coordination b�c.we�.n the city's of Beaverton and Tigard. That is m y c'' decision, As : said, anyone who wishes a copy of the decision and the appeal • procedure, it is available at the City Hall tomorrow. Thank you for coming } out. 1 think its ten clays isn't it? Ten days after it's sent out tomorrow. Beth Mason w 11 .1 We' ll' open the hearing now for sensitive lands ,.1.. 88-02 sand sits. develc.pment. review . SOR 88-12. This is an application by Puget Corporation of Oregon to l expand an existing industrial building by 20,000 square feet and to, locate a f . portion of the parking driveway area within the 100 year fli..lodplain. This is a' second hearing regarding this application, The applicant has revised the site development plans for this proposal so a re—hearing was required, Let' me,' the only person in the audience is the applicant's representative, let me say that :i aril inclined to grant the applicant: subject to the revised conditions done in the staff report, Do you still, do you have some objections that you would like to voice or some concerns? Yes. Beth Mason OK, why don't wk_ move straight to that area and if we need to go through the ' forMal process we' ll back up and go through the more formal hearing. • t1r., Levear PI the y , Y , was the issue of off—street str"eet improvement per the l&st paragraph of the Y Y Y Y couple of paragraphs Y Y off-street improvements strictly for ' costs s Y consider'" tion Y costs . , . of that LIES was in place on standards were changed. Commercial streets ‘ , # 4 and that's whaL some of the other Y Y indicates, , „ , Y to that meeting the scope of the project reached a common Y ; ; agreement for the interim improvement on the 74th. And . those two sc te ces cover a whole lot c conversation about reducing the standard fr om commercial street to loca l street and Mr. -ki rtis ., indicated TRANSCRIPT 8 i 8 02 rp� 8 � • l� PAGE �g r • ",4 .. •r_ . -..,..-.._._r•.•r......«4,.,...y. ..,F._.,ap.r.ir.,Sri,..,•Ir.r., .. -.+en....r ....'.,.-✓ .r . • Y • • . . . . street is a u ky,,te sxtuatxur , relations . . . • f l oud laxns. So those hose r issues , . . certainly containing cost but were essentially downgrading the standards that was employed and my point was that if it was built from that standard and that time, there were change the neighborhood to require that standard to be and so I Y . the position to the street not to be over land . . . . . . . . . .c a l l e d for in imprL fement, Paragraph. (, Y Beth Mason Mr. Levear, I've read the various letters that were floating around in 1982, one from you, actually a couple from you, minutes from the City Council, you • know, recommendation of the staff at that time, X did not see anyone use the language even in your letters that you had changed the standard for the street. What I saw was language that said that Council decided to go with an interim standard. Something • . of the U].cinrate development standard which would be required of that zone. What was your understanding of what the interim was? What period of time? • Mr. Levear � , 1 ,4, a was going , . the �.00Ga]. • It is a cc�...�s�erc�.al street. . , , , interim standard c.i g g street standards at a narrower width. • Beth ti Mascwt7 But interim generally refers to a period of time Mr, Levear Sore , r Beth Mason and I want, it's been six years now ,y r» I , 'r'l Fasr.,RIP"!' 81.,08.-02/8CDC 88 12 PACE 1 II • . , . . would be brouq-►,A; up . . . . fuli. standard , . . . i idly developed , . . . be brought up . , was interim until . . Beth Mason Generally, g ne a: ly what happens i s he City does no t wait for all o f the deue.opment to occur along the street before they require the street standard to be brought up They do it piece meal and they do it as development is proposed along the street. It is my understanding that you are the first development now .to be proposed or fn ' this case an expansion to be proposed along that street since the LID in 1902, is that correct, is that a correct? Well, there was One additional development, this is the second review, second expansion site development review you've had since the LIO, I Mr, Leti ar �. Yeah, j Beth Mason Oh, you expanded once before? Mr, Levear i; 4 . 4 . perhaps in 0 . r , . , time and now we've submitted essentially the same i plan for the next phase to , . ; r how much is involved. now bringing that pz irr'tt,. The other relative , 4 , , language is 4 , s utilities . 4 , , is keep . . engiheering had time to evalu�Ate X didn't want to get caught ,„4„ l with language , a , . . requires mo to go , . underground utilities or Y . , M 1.1}e that, r TRANBCRIP r t4L88—o2/stt 88-12 pAG 20 • • .....,r ,. _, .,la..11...... ._..-.. ....a .i.w ..,..-. _. .>,.,., ,....,.•, r,.r...,....m..m..,.......• _ -.I:«...._,,, ._"-«, I_...«I • ra..................�...,..1�'...«.I.-...s......�'w.+..,Cm..,x ,N•,n wtr...... ...,,, . .._ !+. '^. • Beth Masan Generally that's dose at the same time as sire ei improvements are dare because it is put under the street. Mr, Levear I'm those types . . . and I can't imagine that we 'would . . . , 150 feet , . very unique situation limited an the other . , Beth Mason • Let me ask the staff, um, • , do we require utilities to go from above ;., • ground, underground 150 feet and then back up again given? i . I' 1 (Unidentified person) N , •' Um,' my understanding is usually nit, Also, t.rat's going to be partly the decision of, the, utility companies as well because we, do not have control over { � the power linos and phone lines and to on that they're in the right of way and we work with the different utility companies to make whatever arrangements, " y developments, ew subdivis d • 11,�ual�. i�, is for new n subdivision require underground �� ,• • utilities, I think if we had something really significant where we're talking about a large frontage, there might be underground utility. I would personally he surprised if we wanted to get involved in putting utilities underground for a couple hundred feet and then coming hack up Mr. Louear OK, that was , i . practical standpoint i 1 1 Beth Mason And as I understand your revised plan, you're askii g for ten Mere parking g places? rl VI TRANSCRIPT 8L88—02/80R s0, 1 PA3E 2 E P, ry (0 • • Mr, Levear . : . . , do you have a copy of . . . . I Bath Mason Not the map, I have a copy of the staff, Beth Mason And I understand that you've dropped your objection to dedicating the balance of the floodplain, • Mr. Levear" Right, . , . we will dedicate , , . . . . . , . , , an casement on : . , Beth Mason Do you want that? (Unidentified person) I think at this point probably not, but you never know, we may and we may ask if that offer is still good. • Beth Maso n } And Mr, Levear I just want to confirm on :yhing. In your application document that you originally submitted, did x understand correctly that your building area after the 1.��1- expansion was approximately 29,500 square feetf So you're almost klot<+lling by this ap,41 .ication with another 2.0,000 feet added" Mr. Levear yeah, TRt't1U til l.iY RIP 1 81.488-02/80R 88-12 I pI"IG!,» ,( 1� tR4 If dIY r' ' t,..r. .•A..u_.n.....�r.r..a....ra.n ti.r..r tr.Rr -.« _,.,-_,-l.l-, a ••w.-...Hryr.rrr »,. V.+•.»,rn,....lrrr.a.....r .., r I r u• I Beth Mason Mr. Your ositrions to me. Um it z,' G!< Mi I�Levear, you Idid � fan4.. job in presenting � y 1 p g y p is consistent with the position that you presented before with the exception I , I I of the dedication of the flood plain which ou'vel now through a revision } q dropped your objection to. When the City passed the LID in 1982, LID's are a political creature in that they arbitrarily impose, development charges on people regardless of what's happening on their 'business at that point in time They just come in and they say to everyone in the affected area, it's time to develop this street and we're going to charge you for it. That' s a , very difficult decision for a lot of companies because it does, it has nothing to do with whether they're in a growth mode or a recession or whatever's going f; :or oriel On the other hand, when an applicant comes before the City in air' growth,, model prepared to develop, and in your as almost double the size of your • `^ • I , facility, the City is much more re irterested in the fact that with that benefit of development cones the responsibility of the time has come nuti to bring your development to the standards that the City adopted some years ago for the ' area, That' s why as development occurs, piece meal granted, but as it 'occurs a,iong the str"eet we require the applicant to bring their property up to the • City standard, the public standard and we're Mess, we're more strict at that I I time than we are in the LID process which you know you recently in the not tco distant past been involved with So, I am going to deny your request to continue the interim standard i''or the street in front, of your property, • I think the time has come, the interim is over, your development, your company is doing well and we wish you well but it's now time to step forward to meet your responsibility with the City and bring that portion of the street that's under your control up to the City rtandar"ds. So, I will approve the application. :f~ will grant the additional parking that you requested under your revised plan, ; will adopt the at4ditional conditions 1.H of the past I I memo of duty 5th which includes the street improvements, ?,rtuaily the street im,�rovehients Were in the origihai staff " t I am going to ,. • "' t� f recommendations, Ru r'eq'uire that your bring that standard up to the staff report, And as to the street light sanitary sewer make it clear in the 'opinion that the , reference is only to those that are needed" I'm not going' to arbitrarily reqwit.. ; you to bury everything, Thank yo u Mr, Levear, appreciate you coming -r out tonight spending a night here. This is 8:00 PM,' It is ;tuly 6, 13881', ' TRANSCRIPT SL88 Cy r tf $8 i2 ��L� L . I I I I 4. I • r M • We're in the Tigar ity Center Town Hall Room,' T t.s 'i,s the time and place ' set to announce the decision of the app1ic ration of CU 88-06, A :rw, ,nest for conditional use approval to construct a heliport on top of the 12th story tall . , ' . ' Lincoln tower building.d in Let me approach the m ,' so you can Isee what : did, • Tho last' hearing, if you recall. I continued it so I could talk to the State . ' Aeronautics Board and to the DEQ, What' the State Aeronautics Board l people 0 told me was that I'm free to restrict the flight path to and from that ea ; M ' y building in any mat er~ x wish, That they will defer to me to restrict the • flight path. And what DEQ told me is .that they dig not regulate noise for that r approach, So 1 considered, they do require the applicant� to do. this LOIV,I this contour of how noisy is it going to be at the various radius a i out frcri, the center. And we talked a little bit about equipment. The applicant, if you recall, was interested in using a Bell 206L as one of their units and 1 don't . recall what the other one was a►!., (Unidentified person AI Huse something. . uoth 'Mason Huse, yeah, the bell was their quieter of their two equipments What the he' ., e DEQ people recommended and what I ended up doing was restricting the 'equipment to equipment that is no louder than the Sell 206L. They said that. it doesn't . • make any sense to restrict the equipment based on size because some of the old two seater equipments are noisier than some of the new six seater equipment, ,• It doesn't seem to have anything to do with the size of the equipment. It has to do With the make and the ago, o what I did is approved the heliport�o t but dramatically limited the flight path, . , Y , �, so �they have for access, for landings and take off, they may use the area from 200 Y , 280 °" Y A A make possib?e for them to Y Y , Y absolutely Y approach . r'k I also ' • limit the hours �Y 8:00 AM to Y Worried about dusk but dawn Y summer. • times :dike Y Y Y noise is that quiet, • (Unidentified person) . What you said that DEQ said about the noise7„ TRANSCRIPT C .8, 8-02 SUR 8 8� i 1 PAGE 24 X .,,,J' • • Beth Mason They don't have specific regulations about the noise, recommend. But they do require them to do 1 1 ; 1 this kind of analysis . 1 . or within this 1 . but because of the , , . . I'm not letting them come in . . . . this Unysis this is • the cemetery. (Unidentified person) Xri other words, I'm right here, I'm right here in the corner, in 'other 'words' you'd fly right over my house. Seth Mason . • Nape. 1 I (Unidentified person)son) I 1 , 1 , is that going . . . . they have , , . , I'm right here in the comer. BBeth Mason They can't,r they have to be 1 + , , they'd be foolish to try to • • (Unidentified person) Generally, they're going to come in / . 1 � 5 Beth Mason And then limited them to 60 flights a month, Two round trips, Ore round trip being counted as one flight and I required them to keep current insurance ' • and that they have to provide the dity with the name of the operator and manager of the building, And I did it for the building, Stove, rather than ; the helicopter ;sad because as I talked to 01:.10„ 1t't the building owner/manager that is ultimately responsible for that rid. TRANSCRIPT• h F+�g Uh 4 Or 88-12 , I I f.. r r - kj a., • (Unidentified parson That means project manacfer in his place? A Beth Mason h• Its going to be, after the building is built, tester�e will be al building �. manager and it is going t o be that person who represents tha owner^ of the building who will be ultimately responsible and that person is also required to provide a to to the City on a six ." . I g y • (Unidentified person) I How often is that log going to be? I � , 1 /7 Beth Mason Monthly for the first six months and then twice a year after) that, And that log has to show helicopter models, flight times; user r'ames and addresses, I . points of flight origination, destination and purpose of the flight. And that log has to be kept current and submitted to the City, A month. ' So and that, 1 r � , , is round trip is considered one flight, jl (Unidentified person) Now supposing they go, they fly over the area Supposing whether he's that way, they will , , r , just flying over a residential area or over the school Beth Mason j I say, I say it in these words, I said that the flight area for landings and k take off at the heliport shall he restricted to an area between 220 degrees „, and 380 degrees from true north regardless of weath er conditions, roe, easy d' / visual reference, the aircraft shall not approach for landing and then referenced the cemetery and the Unysis building as easy reference points for TRANSCRIPT IPT SL88-02/80k' 8 —t,a PAC , 2 /•{h • , f i i ICI S I 1 I • the air, If preva xA�. Ing winds or other her weather crncxt xons make that r iight !l �.. area unusable in a safe manner, than the heliport shall not be used on those days. It is the responsibility of the building operator or manager to notify potential users of the heliport, of the restricted flight area serving the air traffic' uses any other flight area for landing or take off [ • • building,� S f a uses �► �th this permit" shall be revoked. • (Unidentified person) n) On this flight, what hours did you say? Beth Mason 8:00 AM to 6:00, PM yy (Unidentified person) I , That's also in the winter months and? Beth Mason • Yes, seven days a week, 8:00 AM to 6:00 PM, • • (Unidentified person) 1 Well I , , with the names that 1 gave you ; , chocked all the property 1� owners that was in that proximity of that ,n,Ase, now I did go outside, talking l about the noise„ I 'did, what the people were concerned, about is what ' is an 1 , airplane is doing x • this area? That's what they was CI onC d bout, , • Beth Mason • Well, what they're e doing is 1Na t that it business is run nc W, That i a how business is rung TRANSCRIPT SwpU—02/S OR B8-12 I"Aar .GF r� I. i+ a . I . t\ \ . i i • • .• , • (Unidentified person . . . . That's what they 'asked me and I said well, that's, if you want to find out anything, you've got to come to these meetings, I sail, you don't, I can't I can't get, all the details . ; 0K, but you can see, you know, the ! Uhysis building on the south and the cemetery, a straight line . from the cemetery down to the helipath on the north and they've got to stay in that area GK? "hat's my decision, Thanks for coming out. This map will be kept in the City records. (Unidentified person) � � � � � �� \ My othier;, question I still have to ask, I have to find out, when the CUT OF}" • 1 TRANSCRIPT $L48—02/80R 88-12 PAG 28 w . Y ' 1 A ACGL:.IILGDA • TIGARD HEARINGS oFFICER WEDNESDAY,, jULY 6, 1988 100 PM • "I°X(,,AR D CIVIC CE1\1..r t --. 1"0W1‘1 I°! ►LNl1 • 0 'l. 2 5 SW A 1,,N. BLVD, . � i°1 1 1 C" to o rlee rl' '" ! • • 1 1)U131Y.,IC 1�1EA1'�: NCI I i? * . • • 2,1 SITE DEVELOPMENT' REVIEW 8DR 88-12 sE\IC a TIVEt LANDS 8LN, 88-02 I11PO # 5 .�Iy1N U h H N "� 1 IY 1 Request by PUGET CORP, OF OREGON ON �to expand an existing ��,r��,1Gi;rt,rr ial building by 20,000 square feet and to locate e a portion of a parking and 11 Zone:1 driveway'1��aIr't�a within the : 0O year flood pl an Zone, :I.1a' (Industrial , Park) , Road Location'. ;7440 W Bonita ad (Wt,TM 281 I2AC, Tax Lot 600, it I11O"1'111 this is a second hearing regarding gird 1.ng tthis application, The applicant has revised tho ;3Ito Development plans forr., this proposal l so that r rehearing ,is required, • 0 Decision for krrlt,og r Development (C;OTSWALNO'# 4) 8 d7-0 t 81_ 87-01 • E .v' 4, flDJCyURME111"'L • } A 1 • • 1 'V c Y I r . TIMES PUBLISHING COL AN ' k L � l , . • P.O.Bt' 70 PHONE(503)684-0360 1 tIce '1("``rl, BEAVERTON OREGON 97075 r Legal Notice Advertising /r 67- • � Tearsheet Notice , 0--,it 1. at/ (ggc-,,i'q 7 1 lib . • 0 Duplicate Affidavit / i 0 aittet"/1:6 ty-- 9 7 2 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION I I A STATE OF OREGON, I )n . COUNTY O, AStill iGTOt , )`' . I, % fa / 'L .k.�l i being first duly sworn, depose an r"say f'/:t I a m lie— vertising I Director, or his principal clerk, of the 0' , I a a newspaper of general circulation as, d 'fined in ORS 193.010 and 193.020-, published at..__., ,. ,✓. in the afore a`6 o'/ t and state hat 'e, , � /' a printed copy of which Is hereto an 'axed, was published in the I � entire issue of said newspaper for I 1 successive and consecutive in the following issues', . ' 1 • „T, fit+,,.��Ii�� u,�•�,r �• "'� I,____4; '' 1....(. 'A.4 .),.: i ,.. , ' t Subsorlfied. ttl-?�� ,;: 1 to before tine this .,/ ,___...a.a6 1 � � � � � � � ' t ''No'ary Public for Oregon My Cornitiss1on EM,pir`e . .! -ye- AFFIDAVIT � My i I I I I • I I , • • • • • • • • • • • • . • I i I ■ , , . , ,ilit . . „ I ,• _,,, . , „ „ , . , ,. , i. „ „ ,,, : „ ,. . . „ , : „ , „ „ . " . . . . _ , , , . „ , i • : II ;li, k ; Li'' I IVt ',..�... Fi'lY 1-ny.,W.,J...I,+n 74:.Mru...a.' 1 ' , , "S P,�. .. K „. .+,,lire " ° PUB L.is 1o'�'9ms. r "I. n 7 ,,r T i, ,, I �'w r Zvi' ,�^^R�t n R� J I t c ` F t .` '.v v I { i b,ti A4,1, - J� ¢ a - I" I i 't ' •,;,',...,.;,iq, SI r i"I'1Jr'Li1 /^.+,(1,'. �lt�l�+„,�, i, ti .f + 1 i • 4i I " :I„Il •', �..'.777.-r7:777,77.,,.4' d�7 t '�i� !it t ti, ,i:'I 'plye.4�te,1i'0,4.c W j�M► ,0q id l l.day lithe' .100 iolf rtitirl 5+tittiueeoltiti .b.�� ,� {� .'n I . Wednesday June;8, .1988,1 a j=7 '.M. at Tigard' iv'ic'Centei`- Tow ''H '1l '' M13125 S.W.Hali.Blvd.,Tigard Ore en.,'Both public eta'and brit en testi#xti,a'! wpt 'd; , y i ° in i ud ` he public: hea iu,.on this„ rit tter� Willa be'ed duet d Ulan' ,ar accordance with'the rules of!Chapter� `18.32.'ot the Tigard and`Municipal Coil � I 13 I t A ' and�ruie 'and proc¢';dures of.tire HHea'rings Officer,Further itifiar nation m ay, 'r 1 t Re lanai i Divisionr at 1 �25 S.W. Hall Blvd.,Ti br�l,} 6e•obtained fry I „1 ore IIA,.A�_ y /'1� .calling tl� 'lilyw t bik /{ !fr�`f affil X11„..e: Q�'�RQ�(q�i' k i l4 rk �4 I 1.1ee � �4�� yr � 1 ��xi : 6f�, „ I A' .✓L � � �� ..'I ''� ';, o t ^P .751 `� pM1�M7H+/ � I atr NL� �7 ,' 'w f. �,' I I � b �. I Re ues ii t- Cod rbf'are n:'.n e �{ ,,I,building b','20,00 i s4Uare;feed and;to�'iocate.a,1 ortine,,bf,n pur'iii.ii avid' ,- ' dr�iyve{1w1u"2ay�"�ai.en.kitiilti:,;ttiell 10tll�±i'e1ar.hitoodTr�1i•'�p�1Xyn�� . Zoiti,,µ/IQ gkititt/u�striai a a, 1 ,. F,�. ark)t 4iocation'7440►7Y�'V;i r.Boni,ca RtiW(Ad ( x.11',+.R. 515,1 Ar ip" C,Ta .,�L• of 60 � �a S IJ• w V0,800),' it ':. p., '� = + 'lu II I t �, TT'6822-"�-Publish May 26,19882 f ,;,„ n, • 6».11l..W.l4-+-+.+!rRk�l Ml.rdn.J+ �.+.i+•r .wo..n... �I:...:..� I I n I I I i ■ I • I I I I I .AI a I Js I I I l I I' a, .� ', i, � � _......1...«w..:�w.N-' r•.JA.Y..rw»�-�....1l.:Li'H,.f..r(.»1...:.:.1 ..i....rw,....�.�..M d4.,Y FU✓«.µ+•.•.v... • e0TICE: ALL PERSONS DESIRING TO SPEAK N ANY ITEM !MUST SIGN THEIR NAM:„ and note their address on this sheet'. (Please Print your name) ITEM/DESCRIPTION: d' te- • • • ', ' I_ ��w.r. I .w�.�.wwr .�.�.....�.•rw...w...r..w..�.wwrrorrrrr�r,�.�_�_ _ .f� ', _ PPROPONENT ( orb OPPONENT (aga.inst�) • Name Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliat5,crca �I • • • • • • fi p -•�s�nii.ii4rr.r • lam ,; I r • I 1 I j C' i I � . 4wi�.ww.rxw,wrrwww U w� � � � I � L........,.,• f'as • r II • I ' w.�w•'..n. J i+«.h+�•r4 i.w�' _ w.i11tN�!�Ii•.,�n-r..+�Jn w.IW:,�w,a,�....•Y err,,...,• III I � „'. ...,. .« '.'....�.,,.,.. ...�,,r, »..� ......e...,....1.:... �.r.,: .. ...v., .r.e n,..• ....... .. .,..�,r .��i 1�.. y...A.w .... �x.._......�, . ... .�..�.... .. .�l..f .�.Yr� i,,w » • '4,.r-...,,,».'.J ..... � ., t i i � , .,.��«..,,... .n...,w .,,.,a...r .. ,. -.,. ...4...a.«.._. ...,._.,=11v.. ,,.» .,.-�.�».u'.'.rr.r......�:.,,..,,•.+.a..«-... L, »u,l.s,nk.w _,-,.. _ • NOTICE:: ALL PERSONS DES]C RING TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM MUST SIGN TilEIit N1 M!-. and note their address on this sheet. ((Please Print your nam( ) • XTCMI ESCRXPTXON: t,� 1 iY, �r ,,� « „ . 4 PROPONENT (For) OPPONENT (against) Name, Address and Affiliation . N amp, Address and Affiliation • 1 • ., r I � c40- .0. l V -' 1,eµ." ,U r f • • It •;r:. .�M;,.rs�u kr +� r ri'r 4,.-:"7 ��'p.� , r , '� � , �. 1. { i r • • • • • i Q AGENDA TIGARD HEARINGS Or'rICErs WE.IDNESDAY, ;DULY 6, 1988 7:00 PM TIGARD CIVIC CENTER --• TOWN HALL 13125 SW HALL L.L SL.V� p. Cal.], to order ' I 2. PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. 1 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR, 88.12 SENSITIVE LANDS SL 88-02 NPO t 5 Request by PUGET CORP. OF OREGON to expand an ex i st x r industrial building by 20,000 square feet and to locate a portion of a parking and driveway area within the 100 year flood plan. Zone: I—P (Industrial Park) , location; 7440 SW. Bonita Road (wc,Tm 281 12AC, Tax Lot 600, 700, 800) . NOTE; this is a second hearing regarding this application. The pp has revised Development plans for this proposal so a 1xG...nt ' the Site Ueuel. that a rehearing is required. 3 , OTHER BUSINESS • n Decision for' Krueger Development (COTSWALy # 4) 8 87--O3 & SL 87-01 d, ADJOURMENT dJ/4B2 d • f'. ti d; ' h • �, r ` t . ,I • ♦" MEMORANDUM Agenda Item 2.1 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGOIII • • 4\‘'\) TO: Beth Mason, Hearings Officer r July 5, 1988 FROM: Keith Liden, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Amendments to SDR 88-12/SL 88-.�O2, Puget Corporation Expansion, Oh JUhe 8, 1988, a public hearing was held regarding the above case and an oral deG xs 1 c r _f or approval, subject to conditions, w a s' granted.'t�K .I Following o this `decisin, the applicant decided to pursue an amended development plan, and it was subsequently agreed the hearing should, be re-opened -to consider the . revisions , • The applicant;: has submitted a modified site and landscaping plan that includes the followinl revisions: 1, Ten additional parking spaces on the west :tide of the one-way driveway, I . , • 2, An amended site layout and landscaping plan for the new northeastern parking area which addresses comments made 'in the 'June' staff report, „. 3. Although not clearly shown on the plan, the northern 'drive is to be $r s omitted, r 4 Partial evergreen screening along the west side of the project. • 5, Though not shown, the applicant has decided to dedicate the 100 year flood plain that will remain after completion of this development The staff finds the proposed amendments to he consistent with City standards , as discussed in the June staff report, The following changes to the conditions of approval contained in this report ar'e, recommended, h h io Coradilt ion 1 ,h, • A revised site and landscaping plan shall be submitted for Planning Director approual which includes the following items: ,' 15 The parallel parking spaces near 74th Avenue shall have minimum dimensions of 8 ,5 feet by 20 feet, , 2) The northern driveway ih the new parking area shall be (omitted, 3) Specific species and size of landscaping materials shall, be identified yy d I ; ; u , 1 , f ' ii7 ,..,,., .' ,. , r • ' ii /Qjy O „ t .' , Beth Mason Paget July 19 88 . . 4) illustrating , • Specific plans a s '11 s � p p a. � trata,ng how the two trees located in the southern � � parking lot will be saved as indicated. 5,3 'Two handicapped ca pp ed parking i n g 5 p a ces within easy access to bui lding�ding . entrances. , . ,. Condition 1.1. ` The 100 year flood plan shall be dedicated to the public from Bonita Road ' ;. to the south property boundary. The y dedication documents shall be on forms approved by the City and shall be recorded with Washington County. y Condit1oi 4. ' The air conditioning unit and r� an, an y other outdoor mechanical equipment �shs.11 � ; comply with applicable DEQ noise standards. , • The staff has also completed some additional research relating to the 74th Avenue LID. Gary Alfsons's memo of June 10, 1988, described the different • street standards that were contemplated for this LID. re concluded that the decision to use a reduced standard of six inches of crushed rock on three inches of asphalt was prompted by an effort to reduce costs. In the summer of 1982 there were several meetings relating, 'to the formation of , 6 the LID. Enclosed are two, letters from Puget Corporation to City officials, City Council minutes from 6/14/82 and 7/12/82, Resolution No. 82-54 and Ordinance No. 82-39. No additional clarification is offered regarding structural uctural_ st nda rds, but it is clear that the project e ct was I limited to $95,000,00. The Engineering Division recommends that the street improvement conditions '' ,' note d �� the Staff Report ort r en in: The ie ref ere reference in this conditi on to street , ,, lights, sanitary sewer, etc. , is meant to require only those, items ” that are ti; I The Engineering Division riot h : �, needed. ' • has had time to evaluate which items will actually be necessary. ht/5726D r Enclosures • I t I I I CORPORATION 7440 S.W.BONITA ROAD PORTLAND,OREGON 97 2 PORTLAND PHONE:M3)639,3109 639'3109 TOLL FREE:?BOO)547-9690 June 1 5,1962 .. I I ' M I n S#g I.r l.r8 nk Currie • of 2 a,rd t P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 9722 Dear Frank. 1 , r l, ' I would like to thank you wnd Bob i-jean for your cooperation in resolving the L.I.D. differences of opinion. The Cot nci l l s resolution' decided to go with the l interim L tendI rd a.=' follows:, . al:' 24 loot roadway ire,th gavel ,.hotiiders 20 Storm main,i' culverts and tatcla. basins. 3. Cut, fill an4,".7!em.;1- nLlellt. 4. i'i o curbs or Tide alt o, 5. Uon remcoxxstranoe e; eeren t far full 3.mnrove=oxY t when 74th is' extended �. r to DilTlitrin load. The Council further decided that the aslsessment should ce Lade 1 sed on t ze abl4y . area cmd. one- ,lf of uscaale, ar.ez., on the cornor' looms, c' l r.:r.o,;er, r I` "et l Ue e' fiGzro, the project will be evti e='ed the propert y owners and v' Council, `']u�r ` hcr_o n.,: '! directives from troL.T.'.w'k l' incorvora.ted' into o..:' n_r u_, 11h0 e6gt of i;"4-.is It I : should be a!:st•2.2od 4 J 1 o your coopewa'W2..or, • v I , I r . r+ o r� r• 1. ti r,lx., 4 1 <,. Il 4 1)130 Itn • n f. a t' } • I I E. 1 ' • I 'I , • o • .. ..• ,• ..�,�, •�._� -, �� , � 'sir�... •-.M..,. �,., ..... _ •_.e 4 • 1o, 982 • o Bob Jesup Administrator City of nsard 4, Tidard,0 Oregon 9722 Thank you for taking the time to wet with us on P.viday to discuss the 74th Avenue , LiwXeDa To staviirize the lgtints dismissed, I believe that we /Gave total bed • all Q: ' c p! $95.000.00 to achieve the objective a the 144X61). to occur irli That objective to ptvovide r, roadway which will &llowt induirtzaial development •. the met,t this beets objecting)cti has been mitt " eau be feature/se bei.ieve rev of old,nions is ' t it wit be t drat= and. limbo in at thia`, t3�, A Haile O be a es West ' ' elope future 74th Avrada We 14.1 city, t b a et stars t p a good tins to get the job done mottos If the to' '.••�•. rise above S9%000600, lersApport for 'the project le oeverell grated. *toted t, t tie project ?Attila I. agreelent on it ge rb The Lowe not disimiesed at our meettoir wan the eso to be addressed at a, latecr tine mace specifioatiovs ot 1 , x can ansiet you farthaz in, ylYttr Zeview a this zattev, pleas. feel free to, jai eat :. ^9 • • . . . • . „ .„,...,. -• , , • , : . •'• , ', ,. .'. , ;• '' .■ • ,.., , , , . . , . . •,...••••.-'..,' . .„ . , , „ . . . , . . . . , „ • , . . . ., . ,,, •• ,., -,. •.,, • . ; •” ... .• ?i,,, ',..,,4 , ,/. ,.„, .• . . . , . . „4,. ,. .., — :•:,'".. '':. ' , . ., . . . .,. .. ., —''T —4 • , . „ . . . . ':', ,::':, J. -..12,•-; ',, — „ • • .. .. . . .. . --14=ILE.L____IUMMAR : AMOUNT . . . :, : ' . '. ' ,••,,,,,f.•:,:r;fi, ______ ' ''' • "•' ' ,,--.;,;::: ,,„,,,•• '',.., .'„, ,,, ,•••,..: , '. k rle,,, v.,...:', FUND SsUBTOTAL 4,466,1.59 • ' .'•••' i' :•' '''''' ,.. SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 229,253 ' • • . 'c::•,,'f!,- •-• .. •.: t- 'It:,:,..-,.; CIVIC CENTER 1TPJECT 4,900,000 '...',', :. . , ._ ...':',:: ',:': "...:4..',,, .'”" ' ' ' 'Y'4•,4z, .11, ,„- • y"-,,,,V,Irre . '.,': -,'• .• : i•it,',..,',.,,, 1 GRAND TOTAL ,,,,,_ -.., . 9 595 412 ,• .1 He also reported the talc rate will decline from the present ''" • ''' $1.19 per thousand dollars assessed value to $1.12 per thousand. . . . -0,.. . . , - ' . . .,.,,,,tg,:, ...‘.:. , .,. ,;,..p.7.-t, ft „. . ' .•.. ••, 4: . • ,•,„,,,,,),,:... The budget., document will be changed slightly to reflect the •• ' - ' ''''4'1:i'i"'' .Ait':::k - union settlement and various impacts wkich have occured with the .., downturn in revenues. :,."' '; .. --,, n'. •',. '' ', W (c) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Coun64or Stimler to ..., ..„ : ,,, . .. :. 4..t close the public hearing on the budget for 1982-83. '',,,,,,, . • .. ., .,.„..1,1-0e,), ....' -.I ,..., , ..,:', "'rt'.1::: (d) City Administrator reported final documents will be regk, for adoption at the 6-28-82 Council meeting. " ' • ,,I,,••.',V.,'': , ', , • - . ,: ,'•': -,,. , l. 4.:i%•. 74TH AVENUE LID HEARING :. • , ,,..t.,1z•• .., . . ..5.-., ' • , (a) Public Hearing Opened • .: , . .. .-t.4. ••• . fill' '..,,... . . ,- +, (b) Director of Public Works gave brief history of issues noting ''"• ,.77.--, ,.::'',.,"A• -:.• ., 'Y - :' ,T', citizen dissatisfaction with scope of project and aenessMent , ., , - ' ',:' . ' -'1'11if4', . method proposed. After lengthy work with the citizens in the ,.''.. • •;,.. ' , 477'" t .' ..t area staff has reached a compromise agreement for interim , .. ,. . ..12.„‘i,,::. , :• . . HI:„Iv',1 li 4 ,,,,, n•.. ••.:,•• n , , •-,..,.:. . improvements to be made to 74th Avenue. Also he noted that a . ' • • yi.t,,,i!', 'non-remongttance agreement will be required from each , , . . ,..: :...I..- l'4',A1.7i . ' . . :,..,,, ..•• , .,•:, sp, pArt4.ciparit in the LID for future development for the full , _ . • - • . , . . . ir length of the street. •. •• ,.• -,41/:' : • ., , . . ... — • • , . . . , ,. ' " : ''' The interim improvements proposed would include; 24' surface edge-to-edge, realignment, cut and fill, gravel shoulders, anal drainage by Culverts and catch 1,-„sins with no curbs or sidaWalks. , ... ' .. • ' 1,..,,,,.‘,. . . , ,'".:,:. •,. '•• :0.,7 • - . .., •.,,,, ,,,,,.:, .Af,,..4 Director of Public Works advised Council that because of the . • , change in the plans and specifications for the improvements, Resolution No. 82,44 is no longer valid and a new resolution , • - • •: -, ..,, Ar , will need to be adopted to-allow for the proper action at a • • . ' , . future public hearing. ,, • , • •.-•, ,-.„'.., ,. ;,: . , . .. , . . .,, -.-•• • . w (c) Public Teatimony: 4. - ' ' ". , "" "•A'r i. . ' ' , Kti. John Skotetes, 17010 Wiiiet Road ',:Beavertoni appeared aa an .. . . . , : :• . •: 4:.• ,,4, , : c.• . :, ,i, i'..;15,4V::, interested party and stated the property owners accept the , ... ','.- - " • . : ,-4,,,:4' ' interim schedule of improiementa and' encouraged Council to •I" : • ,. ,, approve the interim stan4dr&S,' as the street is Unique and should , ' . • „., •. .., . , ,,,,,p,A,. • „ not be required to ,developHeO city stOndard at this time, Re., . •,, : • .: .: .. ,, , also requested that if the bids come;.46 over $95,000 that the , • .. . •.,.. ., project not be oodipietedi ,. . ,. . . ,.... , , '• 1i . 1(' ' t. , , 0, -:: H --H.,--t'0"8 5 - COUNCIL MINUTES .- JUNE 140 1982 , .. • ,,, - • ::- it. . )1( , , . , I I , ■ ■ , . . *'P.!:.'.1.)'''' ' , ' ' • • , I I „ . . •. ' ' ' 46 . ■ . . • . • • . • •• ,' • . • . . . • 1.• • , „ , . ., '• • • . • . , . 1 • .• ..•,, ', ■ ' •,,, * \ . ■ f, ; . » ,P :�' ", ' ,��:'`' , Mr. Dan Mercer, of Mercer Industries, stated he was in favor of the interim plan and the limit of $95,000 on the project and ,' , felt the method of assessment was good when figured on schedule - A-(3) as proposed by staff. (See attached schedule A--(3).) �a ,.:',1',A,. :". Mr. G. R. Abbott, 15065 SW 74th Avenue, stated he was willing to ,.', . ' go along with the LID, however, it would make things difficult •in this time of economic recession. i- Hre Geoff Levear, President of Puget Die Casting, stated the .. '''.';. :,..:.,' ! interim development will serve the needs of the area. •' , *r•' , '' V' (d) Director of Public Works requested this item be set over to duly .`,• e'; ,. 12 1982 for a hearing on the new method of assessment.. Staff •i'•'•4''. will. present a resolution at the 6-21-81 meeting to call for the °; new public hearing . : ' •.;r,rti. .t,e.c', . CY (e) Mr. Levear and Mt. Skourtes agreed with Director of Public 1 ;s;., Works' recommendation. ,,, r 4,1.4.„.. :' ' ;: ;:� (f) Public Hearing Closed. �� , .. .if';, • , • , ' :ti;; y. (g) city Administrator advised Council that dui. to the unusual .,. U,:4,'., configuration of the street and land surrounding it, staff could , • � s` recommence the interim improvement proposal with the • ;r ; F •,n, understanding that a non remonstrance would be signed for 1,4 ,?,,, eventual improvement of the entire length of 74th Avenue to City ' : street standards. • 'i+.P. 1 ' '' 4' by or Cook to have ,9 ,., (h) Motion by Councilor Stiu�ler seconded b Co�incil • 1:'4•A.;, staff prepare resolution of intent for assessment based on area -� ' '1,kl� (Schedule A - (3)) with adjustment to lot 800 to one half of the . ' t`• ' usable land being ,assessed with the interim stan�eards being used yet ' '�" for the improvement. Council requested the resolution by T, b-28--82, x. „ ; n ;' • ,,. i•i`, " Motion approved by unanimous vote of Council• ,� ,: ' � ,1' . 2ONb ANGE - ZCA 2-82 ('doter-aims) - NPO #4 �. 'r' , ' ',' 4t A ieque by the City' of Ti.'gard to change the zoning on 3 :lots 1•� ,' •;1$ , located roe to,: , 'orth 'side of Hampton Street*'between 69th &, 70th, from • c ' ` t' • Washington Coun , toning RU-4 to City of Tigard C�-P�� J I r 1: , �:- r' Commercial-Pro.fessiona' The lots were annexed to the City on May ; `; 19, 1982' ( ashla• Co. Tai, ,, 251 D, fax Lots 2800, 2900, & 3400) • : (a) Public Hearing Opefid l'.:': ::.:: A114 (b) Planning Director advised. Counc il this r uest was changing the F . zoning f roin Washington County,.bo comparable ; ty •ioues o u • 1/: a. ' (e) Public Testimony. 1,No one appeared to speak 1 , .x . : `. i G8 6 - COUNCIL MIhUUTE8 " JU i 14,198 • i I I • r I. , � r .r 1 1 ,( 1 :�.�< CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 82-��`A , r r r r r �r , DECLARING AN INTENTION O CONSTRUCT CERTAIN STREET IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN AN AREA • '• w DETERMINED TO BE A STREET IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT TO BE KNOWN AS LOCAL y STREET IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 27, SW 74TH AVENUE: DESCRIBING THE PROBABLE COST THEREOF; DEFINING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT TO BE BENEFITED FITED AND • • • ASSESSED; APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE WORK • ' ' I, f AND ESTIMATES OF THE CITY'S ENGINEER; AND SETTING PUBLIC HEARING AND DIRECTING • THE GIVING OF NOTICE THEREOF. e WHEREAS, the City Council has accepted petitions requesting street improve- . d runts and has received a preliminary engineering report, identifying general i project scope and probable cost Hereof, pursuant thereto, at � e Council's regular meeting of December 14, 1981. : • WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 13.04 of Tigard Municipal Code, City Council finds it expedient and necessary to investigate the improvement of the hereinbelow I described lands by construction of street improvements and pursuant thereto ' the City's Engineer has submitted to the Council a preliminary engineer's report for the work to be contemplated and the probable cost thereof together with • a statement of the lots, parts of lots and parcels of land to be benefited and , , • the apportionment of the total cost of the improvements which each of said lots, w • • • parts of lots and parcels of land shall be assessed on account of the benefits .. • • derived; and , WHEREAS, the Council finds that said preliminary engineer's report and „ .. estimates are satisi;actory. i Y. WHEREAS, the Council adopted Resolution No. 82-38 calling for a public , 1. hearing on this issue to be scheduled for May 24, 1982 at 8300 p.m.; and 4 ; • . WHEREAS, the Council finds that said hearing date should be set over to • aline 14, 1982 for the public health, safety and welfare; and w . WHEREAS, the Council adopted Resolution No. 82.44 calling for a public . s'. hearing oh this issue to be scheduled for June 14, 1.982 at 8:00 p.m,;; and WHEREAS, the Council finds that said hearing date should be set over to . ally 12, 1982 for the public health, safety and welfare; �n .. . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TMA.P.O • as follows: 1 . , (a) That the City Council does hereby deem it expedient and necessary, . and does hereby declare its intention to improve the aforesaid .• ,, portion of SW 74th Avenue by construction of grading, paving, storm . drainage and appurtenances thereto. (b) That all lands situated within the boundaries described on the !, attached "EXHIBIT A" are determined and declared to be a street .. irnProvernent assessment district, to be known as s 74th Avenue ., " ,;. • Local Street Improvement District No, 27, and it is further de- e .1,�' dared that each lot part of lot ar`id parcel of can, Within said ' `� � r� ; 'l r:, boundaries will be especially benefited by said improvements, and i 4. , ■ • .4 . J {.�✓� ^, � K that the total estimated cost of $95,000 for said improvements ' ti, shall be assessed in full, on an area basis with corner lots being .. r.. , ' a' ,4. ., assessed (1) one-half the lot area outside the 100-year flood_ .-, , : .,.,, plain, against all within sa id improvement; district. ' •• (c) That Monday, the 12th day of July, 1982, at the hour of 7:30 p.m. at Fowler Junior High School Lecture Room, 10865 SW Walnut, Tigard, Oregon, be, and the same is hereby set as the time and, place for hearing and considering objections, or remonstrances to the proposed . ' improvement by any parties aggrieved thereby; however, , • (d) That plans, specifications and estimates with respect to the improve- ° :■. ments shall be submitted by the °City's engineers and shall be maintained • on file by the City Recorder for public inspection at least 10. days 1 „ , R prior to the public hearing. h (e) Within ten days from the date of the publication of the notice of "f°; this resolution, the owners of 66 2/3% or more in area of the property . *r within the boundaries described on "EXHIBIT 'A" hereto attached, may have and file with the City Recorder a written objection or reman- a trance against the proposed improvements, and such written objections or remonstrances shall be a bar to any further 1 • ;, y r proceeding for six' (6) r months. , (f) That the City Recorder be, and she is hereby directed to give notice .a..` , r; by causing to have this resolution published in the Tigard Times issue „.f. of July 1, 1982, " . ' ,'1i', a, Dated at Tigard, Oregon this r,.�,/ day of , ,40../e.,_, , 19 . ,: E �.-'mod , . 4 ' 1 Mayor °' ATTEST: i ■ ,. ' ::*' '411 [ ,), - ' ., 74______•,..- _ •, ., ,. City Recorder w M,,r r. �,�Nt #+{az f, •at,, '(a :c., t, � ■ i,' ♦ 't ,S ,h .r, J ',r , '. ' , 4`d%.LUTI '.NO, 82-- � ' ♦ - • ago 2 to I •.y it / , t r (a) Public Hearing Opene , (b) As date Planner Newton noted zoning designations as reported „ on P ning Department map. a' . (c) Public Te imon .° � $ John Skourtes, 7010 SW Weir Road Beaverton, stated his parcel' is too small to e zoned M-4 and requested different zoning be 1, ,Y ' considered for that land. e Bruce Clark, R.A. Gray • Company, 11450 SW Tiedeman, stated that the land use has been st• age for the last 15 years and some of it is in the floodplain. e suggested 'M-2 or M-3 zoning, • . instead of the proposed M-4, would be more appropriate, ® Art Pascuzzi, 10795 SW Cascade, tated he was against M-4 zone !' designations being placed on the operty in the area and (, suggested M-2 would r<C A. uld be more a pP ro r ate. • Mayor Bishop stated he supported the r nests presented. ,: e Bill Wright, 10795 & 10831 SW Cascade Aven e, doesn't want W-4 zoning, and requested M-3 would be best. t (d) City Administrator suggested that the issue he is what the Comp Plan designation is and suggested that Coun l continue the :. public hearing until staff can determine that issu . (e) Motion by Councilor Stintler, seconded by. Councilor Co to continue the public hearing until July 26, 1982 at 7:30 P.M. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. . %- ' RECESS: 10:17 P.M. t' ', RECONVENE: 10:39 P.M." ` 22. 74TH AVENUE LID STREET PUBLIC REARING ,,` (a) Public Hearing Opened. s (b) Director of Public Works stated this issue had been readvertised 1. • for consideration at this meeting., The street is proposed to be '. developed to 24' and the assessment will be based of area with 1/2 area in the floodplain on corner lots. e (c) Public Testimony`° John Sk an rtes, property owner, stated e-d h o . e agreed with staff's proposal and requested the ordinance read "the total cost not to i " l'' eceed .95,000 . . Discussion followed regarding what options would be left operi. to Council if the bids were higher than $95,000. Director of 5 Vii!, • PuPublic Works recUStutuuueu �, , .,;._ . °' , • . ��`� presented noted c "assessable cost'' not "total C04 ,u Asa L,� leave as many options open as "possible.. *° Geoff Leaver, Pudget Corporation, 7440 SW Bonita Road, supported the proposal. (d) Director of Public Works recommended app oval of the project ' r, , (e) Public Hearing Closed • (f) Motion by Councilor Stimler, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to , direct staff to prepare an ordinance for the July 26, 1982 , meeting noting the "assessable cost not to exceed $95,000". A' Approved by unanimous vote of Council. Staff recommended that if Montgomery En ineers did not want to e (g) g continue the project at this time, City staff could do the engineering at a reduced cost. Director of Public Works will examine contract with Engineers to see if this is possible. 23. cKENZIE/ST. ANTHONY'S STREET LID PUBLIC HEARING f (a) ablic Hearing Opened (b) Dire or of Public Works stated that due to a condition placed I` ' on St. nthony's during a zoning process, there was a petition .- generated o request the LID on McKenzie Street for street improvement This would be from Pacific Highway to Grant Street and Mar n Engineering would do the engineering of the project at the r uest of the church. The LID was figured on a front foot basis at total cost of $56,312.70. Director of Public Works ,, dvised Council that the project is proposed for a 28° wide onway street with parking on each side C and a restricted entrance frm, Pacific highway to about 20' for , safety purposes. \,. Discussion followed regarding the par ing arrangement along the r street. Mayor Bishop stated the State Highway Depart ent should be contacted regarding this deVe1opment. Directo ,Nof Public Works stated that was the City's normal procedure afte e Council declared where the LID project would be placed. . (c) Public Testimony: • 0 Dennis. Henninger, St. Anthony's representative, 'urged diagona. parking and requested support of the LID. o Floyd Bergmann, owner of Floyd's Restaurant, requested approval of diagonal parking as it would seem safer: He also mentioned 1/1/2.,if& .44 iAitiras • I ri f n..01 11 i • n . P ' . . d. a. . .,._,... �' • ' J / ••{•. L„ ,illy (( t. * -, -4,,k.''yir "�w..:'. air . , ' 01,N CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ,I..,,,„4, ORDINANCE NO 827,..34._ iii+. { tl CONFIRMING AND RAMIFYING TIM RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF JUNE 21., , t s 1, RESPECT TO SW 74TH AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT' (L,I.D. #27) ; •: ..:•',; , RATIFYING AND ADOPTING PLANS,, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES FOR CONSTRUCTION ,J; ET IMPROVEMENT DECT:,ARING RESULTS OF HEARING HELD WITH RESPECT THERETO: FOR THE MAKING OF SAID . PROVIDING F0� .. SOLICITATION OF BIDS FOR CONSTRUCTION; PRC7`JI I . . ..1 0:to! , AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. . tEs, a resolution was duly passed by the City Council of the City of Tigard at .J mar meeting of June 21, 1982, copy whereof is hereto attached and by this ' Y • *); ,q';R made a part hereof to the same legal force and effect as if set forth herein , , -,t4r Why the terms of which the boundaries of a proposed street improvement assess- ; ' 5, ' ' ict were described, and the Council declared its intention to construct a .;a: '. ' xovement, and to assess the costs thereof against the property within the „ :,,,..i.,,, specially benefited, assessable cost not to exceed $95,000; and ;MOM/ by the terms of said resolution, a hearing was duly called to be held . ft04,07'Junior High School, 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard, Oregon, on, July 12 ! ` 's,t t,,the hour of 7:30 p.m., for the purpose of affording an opportunity to any . . .. �F grieved by the proposal to make objections or remonstrances to the proposed .` .k',,•'.• to � i s . H• .SS t :i!q',. ' ,J '/.AS, pursuant to said resolution, due and legal notice of said hearing was { ► � lication in the Tigard Times on July 1, 1982, prior to said hearings; . 3.' 41"+. .r 5, said hearing was duly and regularly called to order and held in Fowler :*(''," gh School at 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard, 'Oregon, on July 12, 1982, at p.m.; and - '., EA.,.', by the terms of said resolution and publication, written objections . t'r'ances from the canners of not less than 66 2/3% of the property within . : . 'Les of said area were invited, and all objections and remonstrances as ,, 1`' ted prior to and at the hearing represent the owners of less than 66 2/3% . 1'. ty in the area within the improvement assessment district and that the ....+ ' - of remonstrances is not a ban to further proceed3 r'gs in the making of , nts and. ' ' . .e: '1' .,,,,, all proceedings to date have been in conformity with 223.387 and 223.359 ,��,� (,~, "'' 'ised Sta Jiutes and Tigard. Municipal Code, Chapter 13, of the City of Tigard, M'r : • ';','P `oCedu. 'es were regularly and lawfully conducted; , ,r '�r •. • 4`.' . ::iCITy OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: 1, - '"`' b That all matters set forth in the resolution°of the City Council of the 1 ..' ,, d, Oregon, on June 21 1982, a ca whereof is hereto attached�. ;�l ..�'''�" City of Tigard, r ► py` tacl�ea '4,61e marked Yibit "A" and by reference herein made a part. hereof to the same ' ;','', r,"" legal force and effect as if set forth herein in full, be, and the same ' ' ,i '�� r ;t are heteby approved d, ratified and confirmd,,, except that item gib" therein . 'i.. u i .,.«.... -..-e.. .....,.......,w .»...,,r..w•..,.0 •-_. iii • i , IAµ / `C I "�i!�', 'aw�' a'!,:,, .,'fk 1 shall be construed to read that an assessable cost not to exceed $95,000 I ?�� ;. shall be assessed in full against all lands within said improvement i'. 2. :-..f.t, district, by the method described, and the boundaries of the area known I . '{ �. 1. 4. U i.' as SW 74th Avenue Street Improvement District as heretofore described '''' Iii,.. in said resolution, be and the same are hereby declared and fixed in L. .. .(t accordance with said description. ; 2 That the City Council of the City of Tigard, having acquired jurisdiction n k, .re f,,' or order the improvement to be made, does hereby authorize and direct =X�•n the construction of street improvements within the boundaries of said r 'A SW 74th Avenue Street Improvement District in conformity in all reasonable 1�. 1, ' particulars with the plans and specifications by said resolution adopted , yand hereby ratified, modified and confirmed. ,45,, : 1: That the City Administrator and the City Engineer be, and they are hereby, ''' 'A ' directed irrnediately to invite proposals for the construction of said • 1,,,,t,ki, ,4 , . d in not less than two +f„, .„ „•. .,. .� �improvements by publication in the Tigard Tames ; . , consecutive issues, the first publication to be not less tan ten (10) � ' %^e `' days prior to the 2nd day of September, 1982, at the hour of 2:30 p:rn., i ,' '..'4 "4 �N' which date and time is hereby designated for the opening of bids in the City f l 4. of Tigard, Oregon, City gall, all proposals to be then and 'there publicly '-:4t? read: 4: That a inasmuch as it is necessary for the peace, health, and safety of the ; ` ' " said improvements be constructed L. �;�� people of the City of Tigard that the sa Q the least possible delay, an emergency is hereby declared, to exist, and this ordinance shall become effective upon its passage by the Council ` . �wd,�x , and signature by the Mayor. I ry 41..§.4, 4, 5 X . .- ,- .1,..„, PASSED by the Council, by unanimous vote of all Council members present, 11 :� • read three times by number and title only, this day of ,� 1 . .4-a*, �.'': ,, , Recor.er er - City of ?hard d ° J. B . y the Mayor, this I day of , 1982. 7 , 4 rn7,/,',."'"'./ / A, ge . i , --t.- A 4•4.” i ,00.46.4teiiee :AV."' r' * 1 " u� Mayor -- City of Tigard tea:. MA q,' .tin, , `y^^��' Yid . . . , ,. 1!tiny . A r.. i k' ,1 ►. 46 82-di , Y • iii r • p 1 • P rt . . - __ __ _ /77 / -- - - ---1- -- --- - - -- - - - 1 \--:- -- - --- - • k „, _ • - 44 4 .. .....- -- ;- - - -- _ • , _ t.„:„1,:i _ _ _ :_ _ : iti, , _ui i.ilit_.0 . /.--- _ - - -_ ---- - I - - - - . - - '-- ---- ''''''''ll-l'-'''.."'----- '.--'.-''-:--1-;:-- --':.*:--:-:-.'-----.-.'-:''.---...-.---1-..--'1.---1'' - - ' 161 t 1� , __ ' .-It;--- _ - --- -_ , . '..i.,, ii_ 1--‘-____. ,j _ _\,, _ , ,„„oti . -- iii'v-- .. . _ ,s,-_ - - --__ ki U 0. A!‘ i ..„ _ - , ,,,-...,-. ,,, _-_ _-_-_ kt \ir ,. ,',.:...e _ . : _ _ :.- ,,. _. _ __ _‘‘ _ -.N, • k.,'-u; _--- . _ \ititi__ii_- . I - - -- ---. - 1,77 '_ --- - _ - - - _--_ _ _ _ -- 4,,, s_ 4-- - - _ - -- - - - _ - -_ - - - t - . - - -Th- -i- frit i'tj-i, . ,„I.(...=- ' -- =-_ \ "4bl I.J rit-1.gy. t-ke, 1- -6 ( ,,-[6 P4' c' - _ / sco- - -- f 1-4.,'.4. , - 27---- _ _ - - — . ezo, -e‹....7f- - Ai; - - - - • •_ I ] e • c .L/ I d , tr ' Ii il Li'IV/' -,fr-6' 14 ti \ - 7/ ' ...-- ,,,.• j i pa,..,j to4_-t-- Ili' -- . a _ -crizii . 1 ` . • I -51%. - ; - _ie _ .....„4_ _ _ . . . . .___ _ . _ , , .• . _ .. _ ..= _ _ . ., _ _ _ . o . ..(2- ( .... : • ..-,..-.-_-__:-.; _ -,, _ - 'la. kil .,,, "---0 I:: ,,,,J, e. .c::, , . _ ... __,____ := s :._ ,,.. ...,,...... ,.........._ ...,_ :,. _ . . _ , _ - - , it - = . , . _ . , ;: . ____, .: „ft: • . ... :. .: :. .. _ _ _ - _ _ ,,, % ..... : . . _. . . . . - _- > _i- (AkCp,,, w ,1lo 3 i 0 2-- ReJ fll A-r i e - u X- - c VE' - )(11 - eve fQ _ e yikr.tefltie Z.. c w, m �- - m z _ ` rii. --- `O m-. .- Z. •• .._ . r ,, . .,' • aM 1 MEMORANDUM .1, CITY i VF T. VA1`D OREGON \' ' ": T0: I<ei th Li.d+ n, Senior Planner Jurt0 1,0, 1988 FROM: Cary Al,fsori, Transportation Engine I / , ' •' '. SUBJECT: 74th Avenue Pavement Section ,, . A requested, I have resea rched r ched the 74th LID file ih greater r detail and have -• , extracted 1ho pertinent data in regards 10 the pavement section design, The reports are summarized in chev.I.,ologlic li cadet": 1) April 1�i2 Enginee r's r w � � m�rr y Report . James M. Mont .,iry, Consulting Engineers ,. g 1„ , 7 4tt Avenue a ea zoned light industrial, { e; f • to meet . City if Tigard Commercial Street Standards, . . \., Pg, 40 „, Pr opos d pavement sections Of , . 4" asphaltic concret: 1 i an (3/4"t — 0) crushed rock 112' (2" J- 0) 'crushed rock 1,i r • 2) November 1, 1982 Review of Recommended .Pavement Thickness, etc. Earth Consultants, Inc, Duo to construction uctw:i on ucc;t*rrRri;r•rg in the weather rty created a $c►t"t / 1 •�i• µ 1 d L 1 , 1 / l .. a . str1��:�r aci� which led to substandard conditions, An alternative p,�a�trvtt.li•�i.. , design was submitted as follows; Cog, 1„ , 5 inches asphaltic concrete 15 inches crushed rock T. * S inches asphaltic concrete 12w.,11/2 inches crushed rock .* bated on a reduced traffic loading - 8) November 15, 1982 Earthwork Observation & Testing, etc, Earth Consultants, Inc. ,t. Pg. 1— , r eferences pavement e evaluation study report dated , September 7, 1902. This report s not contained in our files The pavement section recommended in t h September, 1982 report, as eferenced in future reports, 1 , , ' A or ts r a •' i l etirli&-.51_ 11(- z-2,...., #54,t14 � '�.. J , arto 1 . r.i.. 1 114,,,oftiLANAA), ; . • , 6/,d,„, ,,,„ ', . .. y g7f6,' e .' ., .;. ,. • • ,,, , , ,, , , . . a . 71 r it w • Memo to Keith Liden , • 74th Avenue Pavement Section 0 ;furto 10, 1988 I Pace 2 l sp 3 inches asphaltic concrete .` I r 14 inches crushed rock i, . .. Since w� do not have this report, the assumpt:i.orn.is made that this design 0 meets the City of Tigard Commercial Street Standard, '. Pg, 2, , r efe ences a decision on October 29, 1982 to winterize 9 • . the Project, 1 4) May 13 1983 Evaluation of Existing Sate Aggregates and Subgr adQ Soils \krthwost C otoch do a 1, Con sul1an r, Inc.Crc. ' Pg, :1.Y . notes erratic horizontal and vertical alignment and highly contaminated t wint riz�rl`' aggregate baser'ock with l i an average thickness of 4 inches. Pg. 2Y , . Stat ion 1�r.00 to 1!5.tOO (Puget expansion fr„Outrage) 1 1. recommended pavement thickness ) d$i1� existi ng 1g Ui1te izeG surface fac+ 3 inches asphaltic concrete 6 inches (8/4”—0) crushed rock b) r cmovirng wir?' er"iz ed surface 3 inches asphaltic concrete t, 0 inches (3/4"—0) crushed rock i , Station Q „0 to 1+00 (beginning� a t Bonita) 3 inches asphaltic concrete 14 inches crushed l rock I 5) Zr u y 8 1983 Project Completion Report, Northwest Oaut. clrrh1 'G,orhsuiatrrltr>+ , ` 2, Y Project r ect Ch h cnc:to h Pct, 3. , , paragraph 5 refers to recommended pavement section of a) i above for station 1+00 to 15+00 and the "original," prom the September 7, 1982 report of 3 inches of asphaltic concrete on 14 inches of crushed d rock from 0+20 to 1+00, i P, , 4, , many soft✓ ,arreas wore enr;:ountter ed during construction and werr'o oxcatitt&d Last paragraph states , that "heavy construction traffic and inclement weather conditions I '' during the final stages s, of construction resulted in sore l .1. deterioration '1Y.• s .Y lY.N' M f 1 l of portions rM�r�17, of the �w9�Irb��r ��ho soils, etc," o ee Y I I I i I . 1 ' r ,., ..:....«....:.w l«.-+,»1w_..__»..,,:.......,.:.,..a.i:4.:,. ..,.,i...«r...,-. �=.:«n..d...!.:...,nu1.._.. .A f ....., u,..... s ...dt .. m.i__....•-, .F r, .. . >,...5 ...r.«_.I..,,.a,..,.,5........_ • • • • • • '" ` I . rMMarn° to Keith La,cicn ` I 74th Avenue Pavement Section • • June 10, 1988 • • . I ' I'I 6) Se tembor 16, 1983 SW 74th Ave, LID #27 James M. Montgomery, Consulting l r3gi.ni:.acrMs,' .Inc 51 P5, '2, . the original section proposed was reduced from 4 inches of asphaltic concrete oh 15 inches of crushed rock to 3 inches of asphaltic concrete on 6 inches of crushed rock r•' in an effort to reduce construction uction r•osts to a mini ' rnum, 7) Half street improvements on 74th Avenue wore constructed in 1984 by Puget consisting of 3 inches of asphalt oh 10 inches of crushed rock, a local street standard section, - In summary I conclude that the pavement section construct by the LID was • reduced from the des it n(4d 3" c n l 14" to 3" on 6" based on costs and not on • traffic. Eight inches of aggregate brserock was deleted,l t�( , which correlates elates to 4 inches of asphaltic concrete, Since appears that substantial effort was • required to stabilize the subgrade soils increasing ` the subgr ade strength and it would be unsaft to apply the additional 4 inches l along �tho centerline, a reduction in the 4 inches seams permissible, Therefore, the 2 inch overlay on the existing asphalt is needed to provide additional structural sv,pacrt in lieu of a mcrr`d definitive method to measure the structural supporting s :r entL of the existing pavement, g br,/5315 • • • • • . 4,:. -.. . , . _......_ _......... _- -. . • . . _ . • . . 1 . . , .. . .. f S.A. `'' -.'"-=.-7'' ' - ' , -.4•W'i"' '-.4:4 ....;-(: .-,, . - ,-4_- .4,1,-,,,----- r,-- ---.L - ', '-- -- ',1"%-=-- --- - ; ..' - ,--- .'-u,',---- --'- ,----'--;,'""4 - 't,.:'''': .;...4'.--4; 4 ....,'1,4.4,-:,a,,..t_,7,2::*?.•;-,,S4.--vt-,-6.4,,..-,- ,_ - . ...-. _v;,,-._ 4.- - - ,.---,,,,7.-- ,--r.... ..4.ft . . , i . ... __ . co= _ _.:•-7. A-4.;: W.. BOITA' RD _ .-......, __ ak In. A 0 40 lb- - • - ' N. . .-:- - 1. . - ra ta vr) to.. Q 12% - o o -- ca 39÷55 IN f_E-• s -f- - ,+ 4 gri 1. .13 7, 5 G■ 0 14 et i it el i Rf? - ft-) Irsi 1705,E - 03- Mk - CP4. 01 cIV rn AO , 4- 0 . . . ± --4- ,- , - tli -I-- 14-,,, • - , 39+..: ;,.. 6 ' :006 4 ar55't IV . : i figiDGE, 14: (*EDGE Of PY M T. '-:-,- sroRm L INE 2 9 0 12PA_C:F1:3 Tx.ILA/..126 1: -4- 141---N 0-00' _ _ __ : . . ,-c....---...q.mor '"--- - - -. , . ._ .. - . - - CURS L tiyE ) i -"lir\ fo el'Y I'8 / --. I,--.- •L. •.--k - r.-."-- -: \ m ft ' = -_ -__-,„••. ,22 .71:a:r., -. 1 ,.... 13 PA RK I 11 G sx-i*-.'-rbi': ec't'*AE:w-thk- 0 4-39-98 — •• - -- , - ' ' :-I--7:-.7'EVEt•-lii-,t rilka,--':'- \ ,.. *16/b0 I1/417.'Reit4.-b -r.c.'4406 • I 1 1 - 0 ..._ -... -.,. k..t . ,_ _An •-• . . Q. - 1 cjal.„<-",1 1 • 1 __A 1 t Z i. zd . Z 1. 2 3 te3 .c.:- . IL 1 6.4.- PUGET CORP.. 1 t 42 PLANT ...... _._ . ei 4 -, , t - , \ . I ... I 1 • , t.. k -.._, ' 2:.+-19-6- • .1 1 Efia CO a 11-T-‘11 i t 52+' P/N I / — _ - ! - . .........r...........',.........:____..-......_._.... _ .1...move...............................a........-.................. .... ..11INV". ' . ' - *14+64 '4 I 7 ....... 2.....›. .. i '1 C .S.'"--,.... C h, - eA-Fir- • pt, to: ,..... ...... , tA IP- (7; . 11. . 7.P.L 74' --I CUR! 75-I _,..,.. \ 1 L vk, g. ti - ‘ 1 • , - . . _ _..... _ • _ , ..., . ... . .. _ . _ .. . . • . . _ . _ . .. .. 1 „ • 74 . - - • . . . ■ , t - G F s - NEW tom, wasr - (------- . ... ... . VAT: _ - - 19_-. f-1- - - ;-- _i ' '- . (6S - -___ - 3.-5! _ - tst.51 --__ - -,-..',, ::: - ',-"_ ;17-to -.:-..1 I - _su I "EXIST MAID �A, C, ° P1�KT �X1-51' ,� � SIB+. --- . • . _ U - - - - - - R-U D psi 5j/. ieUR I3 :: _ . -\ 3 CLM S t S A/C. -- Z _ - 0:o_Cc TO BC C NST RUCTCO 5. 7 T -- AVE . - - - - - _ - I i- 1. f - - -- - 112-DpA I el"Zci 14. 4- —_ eF- j . _ - • .f . ,` p TrD # J/R k - 1 • 77/7 _ -I . - _ 1 - t _ = Iv y _ - -z4----c.) ' • _!.! ,1-.) , _ . - _3 - 4:3) (c,'"c3j . _ _ - i . r , g _ _ 7 {{ z t (-.: 1(W‘e'_ k Mkt'....‘ 7 - - 4. ti, _ _f_ _ , _ 1,,A2,-- • ....., _ . . __ , ..,__ _ c;.-3) - O. _ __,..„ 0 tt F k. , 4 - _ _ _ _ --- _ . „.#._ v, __ __ _ - -,tk. ___ - _ :Lite ,,,t_oit _ _ __ _- r- I . T t 2 is i. __ _ ___ , __ \ .2. . -,. F' -. - 1 ---".....s.'..."'"*"\ _ TI1 ARe`A i.i 1-r-r r _ - - - - . : •� - - . -SCOpe C? f -fL'e, 1110k . -„" . - ..' -. _ -- • 0 (" 9O ` Mit: '11 -c't. , ,,, , '4,1i',0"' .,i.,, to , ''''''.1'::,..1,; • w_ x•, E to w • • y Z 1 : 0 I QC aw .4 ' , ` ± o 1 1 el{ i ' pt,4 7 et •.. �toVED BY , I $CALF / � ..° � /APP baAV'JiV bAI" REVISED 41 /4/VaSCAp/01U ei',4rai TOs' W I 1 S D i • I , ��....,.,..,..�. , a , , k. • • • .:,'.».t'.». • .,.,.e...•..,,.•.J........ .',..�._..... .. .i»......,„.....�..-._Nw..--.a...+........•.......��.a........r. .M..�• ._.-._.a�..�.. a.a..Aa....li.l.H�.•:....u....u'a MEMORANDUM CITY or TIGARD, OREGON • • • "1"O: kei.th i•'"i.cIert, Sc rti,orl isBranrtt r Mraay 31, 198 • {:;IOM: Gary A:i•fstin, Transportation on Eiit ino ‘r , • suI 3Ec"1' SOR 88-12/SL 8E3-02, Puget Gorpor&t,±o r.X{a l'1 '►.�� • • 1') s ui aitt i,t'1 cl ~t 19 8 a rld' m accompanying u to application Gtcl , att a proposed 20,000 :c aa t foot building ig I addition and parking lot"., with ac cuss and half street improvements cants on 74th ' . Avenue, 2) The subject s. L e fronts onto 3�h � Road and / i�I y r a a n a rl'� I Road 4, I 1 a i "! Corporation �;inlai'�ac�e..iYir improvements wc.i t inackc. to Bonita l�i,a�,rl and '% itrit r�it�c..i7tric" by t.liF. i•uic�t:t: in the past to tho of tho property at 'thtat°. timo, The 74th LID project • , made :irrt ::Q i,m improvements consisting of 3 iilclic s of asphaltic coi'iciilwt on 9 a.1•1 l c los cyf ratiiigi gi,.kt o laasci"cac:lr, to G,a tkii,c1•1•1r1 ''of' 24 • et:, 611,01,t(4 thtc) i.oiltia;i,rt1,i1(,11 s7 t0 • frontage, 74th Atic nuo is c l s;si fi d as a local ;strlt?l tr within an industrial area. 3) I._cca:1 ;st::r'/c!c 'k pavement thickness standards have been provided by I 74th 74th ♦ r4 1 industrial 1 r0/ N 1 I i rl' � � '� :Iit 74th LID, 74•th Attca!i"tc,o servos are indust;i .r,al ai oa aiicl industrial aarit!itttrtt standards require tacicditional. (,araa,14•+•iY1ei•lt; thickness for the increased load placed • on the pavement from tho trucks, to ilitatat industrial I:aaiic iatoi•tt standards the ox:1,sti,rtc,j peatatttatt+,rt't should btr overlain with 2 i,rtcIi 7 s of asphaltic coiricreto from • t:l/to ctrrt•l:F r lino to the tacit of the t• xi,3t .ng {ntvic mcartt, „1"h o new, wi,clt:ri' d • f ` pavement section should consist: of 4 :tr cIric.s of asphaltic concrete over a inches O (3/4" — 0) aggregate basal cac.lt c)Vtar 12 ii1citt!s of (2" — 0) agrrr,�rcxr~;I a1:+ Tarascroc.is f • • . 4) I tc plan submitted s' a wa three u , ucway acca N s o s t ttt 70th r, Avenue, � �c Community Dovolopmelt Co do re a i t os that drivoways ao s aacoc a minimum of SO feet t Apart,rt, t dge to edge.ge. "1"h e no t ht rn driveway conflicts s wilth this t.qui.i itt artt as it is shown to be approximately 15 foot from an ox,±sti•rt o°,' cirisvewray, 5) ,iI•r4: public storm drainage is shown to be collected at the southern, l•owtu t end of tho half street improvements and discharged shown e c sc.har ed to the t • wcst into Fantc Creek, The public lino 3s t at within t 10 foot w x d f oa;emt��rt ,' 'or`e kwi' standard is a 15 Coot wide orast it I public. i� tr whore �" �'7e tc±ittr cltacf i clat trlci to {auil i The e pr.i.t/att storm c:lr ai,rtaK;le ;ys t c m is shown to be co11t cted on—slto by catch basins and di;schtarKcci into Fartrtca Crook, The Uniform Plumbing Cork requires s that all private storm drainage catch basins utilize 'a sump to collect debris, • • • • 6) No sgun:i.•l a, y sewer connections are prapoS,4d as this addition is attached to the existing structure, 1; 7) The proposed parking •o : F stated y encroaching ` Y,� W e r � 1 � ��.�: .�� .�. ��I;at;. ' into the �1. t0 year flood plain, "i"I•t:i.s is allowed p t c.1.:i.d,..d, the necessary permits a I t« obtained from the Corps of Engineers prior to construction, " 1 Conditions : • 1') Standard half-street improvements, i c1u carg concrete s ace w a 1c, driveway apron, curb, asphaltic concrete pavement sanitary sower, stor'rrt drainage, streetlights and tandc►t cjf >und utilities, shall bo installed along the 74th Avenue frontage, Improvements :shall: conform to the alignment of existing ♦ F ♦ 1 «! I ♦ l I V I f 1 I ad jraacstriL i,trtl,arrc�vctttc„tt'Ls F "11te� I; uc ni rt•t t.it ,skit ~s lt�al J.' cons i�a•G. o1 4 a.t'tc It of • asphaltic concrete pavcrc tt on inches of (3/4 xp) and 12 inches of (2 «..0) ' r. , existing shall „1 inches aggregate baser et, (Y •1•l e existing pavement 'shrall'l be overlain with 2 inches of asphaltic the centerline 10 the west edge of pavement, i. right-of-way v/ I r1 dedicated .1 .I ;� Y / Additional shall �i c: 1 r a . � �• Public a � the 1 .t ,a.c� � cW r c tht 7 l t 1vc rtc f o tlag t to increase thc right-of-way tc 25 feet from the � centerline,, The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way s centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms and approved d by 1 the Engineering Section, Dedication forms and instructions are available from l the En neer'irnc Section. ' , 1 8 The northern driveway shall t� relocated �Y deleted i � cot )l i with the 80 foot spacing requirement between driveway way apt ons permit or r , + » , • �� A nc�r�riti.•l; r�r ctt i1�Ilw�rtc.c� demonstrating compliance :aI♦i�rl.l. be obtained � � � �� ; by the applicant from the U.S, ('lir'my Corps of Engineers (Authority: Section • 404,, Clean Water Act, 33 U J .I C Y 1344) for discharge of dredge or ;fill material Y N i the 1 States,/ W! 1 N shall 1' into waters of 'the United St tc s,. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Office by the applicant, 5) The applicant shall. provide for roof and parking lot rain drainage to the public stormwater drainage system, l 6) Five (5) sets of p:iatn and profile public improvement construction plans and or (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a Registered Ptr'ofessional Civil Engineer, detraill;i.ricg all proposed public improvements shall be submitted to the Engineering Section for� approval,r Twc (2) sots of plan and profile plans shall be submitted for preliminary ,review prior to submittal of final plans, ,. 7) Construction of proposed public i.mproveMents shall not corn mertc+w J. until after. the Engineering section has appriovc d public improvement plans, f The section will require a 100% rc;f fur irtaltce Assurance 'oi, Lot:Lor of Commitment, the payment of a permit t: f c and a sign installation/streetlight fee, Also, the execution on o•f a street opening; permit or construction compliance agreement nt shall occur prior to, or concurr.'cmi:l.y with the issuance of approvod public onie Approved ..• fr ` 1 .a � wY ,+�11w«••xwl.x.w Wrw«.wu:xN«+w..w..r.l.wwwW+wx•+~.xJx.xr.:w. .wWwx� wWNw«..ww•x«x.rrwW+y.wwkw i ', . l4 arnd a;1.1.i l� Woo cn y, a i.3� �rnr rrcn c tr` • • • • o. r ,, ,.r II 1 f • gip' / n, 4 ,96 1.8,lfi(:) 0200,2).. (C ene r•ral, Prov i.:>i o or ;:+ubd i v.i :,i.t��ns) 7-q . �e� Whare la rifi•_. l � n�1or d v_�lc �tiynt_ s N tlX cw�t�www_, ir a rd wgad .A.i'4r t:r_.e): e 10 -year. fo.odgii_py > e we _rE rs?,root _rise oowa e t • • • shall requires the_ dedication of sufficient open area for; t' ' • greeitwd _ad oini.r�c arid wi:thirt t.he� ��flood lain. rChisare<a _sh< lh� i • . . include W portions at suiLasle eXevation for the construction o a r • pedestrian/bicycle pathway_ within t;he fluodplain in accordance _with the adopted pedestrian bicle_aathway plan — -_ .w.. ._ . . N,x 1 ,, 18,120,0201d1 (Applicability of Site Development Review Provisions) . Ic Where landfill and/or development is allowed within and ad, cent to i the 1.00-- ear flood lair: � the Cit. skt�all req cation ', of _1' . t...... "y u'x re the ded i , sufficient c�pen land area for grecknway adjoinin Viand within the flood lain/ This - . � area skull include portions at d suitablEa el�uatiort for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplairi in accordance with the ,do cif "ed pedestrian bicyc:le._ thwai plan, F, r VOL.UM. 3:I POLICY 3.5 r,3 ,11 • . l . r: 3.5,3 The City has designated the 100—year f loo.dplain of F'anno Creek, its tributaries, and the Tualatin River as greenw&y, which will be the backbone of the open[—J space system, Where landfill . and/or development are allowed within or adjacent to the • 10O_y ud. floodt lai.n,• the Cam. shall require the dedication of •• sufficient ,open land area for greenw7,�± a Wing and within the y 1 f1oodrslain, } 1826.030 (Meaning of Specific Words and Terms) H : . 8a se Flood, The flood haux'nq or7 r1era__ nt chartcte of b irrc 9.1.19 xlled o r < i ' . exceeded in any given year. Alto referred to as the "1.90 ear ?1ood2 Landform alteration. Any man—made change to improved or iirixnrp s.ved real, ' 1 (4state, includincl, ;laui not limited to the addition of buildings or other structures, ruining, quarrying, dredging, filling, grading, earthwork .;t. construct on stookpil.in or rock., sand dirt or .ravel or other ears material ayinc_, excavation or drilling p2,erations located within, the ;1 f * , area of special:. flood hazards k;f` Floodwa F'r incle, Th grog of. the flood,>l.ai.n lyimg.oui side of�..:the f1codwa,y _ F I ` f �. ioodplaxn `[k1oie alorica watercourse ertcosed b the outer limits of ; «.,.r..l ...w.wl.. N «W' `N— rW N.___yl....«.....1w+.—w..L..-- ,I lend which is su,l ject to inundaticanin __its natural cir lower revised i .N. - '.«_rr._,.,....r.«.wr�..wrMM.« _1..«ww .�..MrwM_.wN. MN 1wNw«.+«..ff_•r.ru.wN+•«+..w.w...�rwr1_,+ru.ir...,n�.tLLL..rµy..+w..N.-•..._-r_-.___w. con tours 'kly the base. flood: �� :.1_... ,r...WwrW_i—_wr..... NN+_Mw . ___.. j is mill ge�wA,ys,w,.. A0 lend whin;k�r.w.�ro.. W_iro,s..«.1ar or t:hzari a 12" ,?,110.0.,.. at., mi.ninu 1.1 ..r. • .N.W Mw..;_.�w r.. «rwww.•w. M_r. Nw• W.W4..Inn,Nw •wwW N....rr+,.NrrNw._W nrw..•:.N..wNw♦ 4 . .. +.wlW__.r , ,0,, Cori , '1 L1 raN1.r,:.a ei w~ llrid its1.1 �0q4.....1 Co d i.nur d,?4t k,d du r'inc rN� 2bN•. 1..r " u.t.9. r with a ,wi �Ww . ww W .I.NNII_M r.*I ,M..4.00m_.r,.Mrr1+N... .. WN........rww«Nrw_ �w. r I., ._Nw.y,1 IN.uw.rw.w_A.r..OA"A N 1 N, ...h,_�•r•.«. ,P9ak _„flow of ate lcaast :3_,,�C.ubir~ f941: ,i,e"l se c:e�Ptid Arid F,unwc'w, ed, at �1 6kst 41 s _w:...,,,....r..,,�w....,.._«,.,,Nw.w�N.,.,._f...........1._+,..�...1. ._w,�.,» ....._....».«,..,..«,.N .»«..N.......r.,ww..«-,:f_ ,. N 1.....,,_.....««..r...N N�.. ,..:,., . i:?!ar'`t .w. l idert :i('iable c; i;a1.191,s thratA 9it:l�aer►°:.w_d�.ai.rj' to i.i•ie Sk lalirji R vi:tr" •Wwrwrrr . I NII.N«.«ryrrww.rw. l�V+•..�+wo-4www._..n,1..i......wN.,.4.«.....I.r.wlNwf.wWwh.�_.wwwwi..:i«« .wr....«..r ...,.y.JN...µr..N wE.. ..+ +. I....,..N....w1tNNWwr.rHrhw.r.Nr..«I...I..auWN.w.ro...N iirc ci:ly _Or aft e . low'ir2+ , through, otkyij�� drainaci w ay. .,,_ im.rihel s, 511154ks, qry' ' NMi V I I.NI...... .....rr..W..aN—,. MW._rr,.rll.w_.w..... WMrwM.NNrwM.NMw rr ,r.W1n. N .np+W1w..INr.,HW..w...w✓ ..rN w r .u.Nw N Mwe. Y+.+_.wM,eYw..w.W.+n.lNNw«Wn �� flalcrdylalk►, , r I. a250/6080P , ,1 . ZOA '�t37.«,03 Af11I Cap 0— 2 (1 i ,1. 9/) , i�f1C4f; t�� , ;, a • w (C4 Ig ( • • • ' ti ff UN 17 198& N 0 ,.��p REQUEST FOR COMMENTS Q��jf�/�1��6/��çflg2Ro 4�Ai �� . • TO: b DATE: May 10, 1988 • FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE:. SDR 88-12/SL 88-02 To expand an existing i.ndustrialbuildin by 20 000 square feet and to Locate � portion of a parking and driveway area within the 100 year flood plain. 7440 SW Bonita Rd. (WCTM 2S1 12AC TL 600, 700, 800) , • Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your rev iew. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other �' , information available; to our staff, a report and recommendation will be Yr prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments ' by May 20 , 19 88 . You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. zau are unable tto re and by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below rit your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If ' . - you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning , . Department, P.O, Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. Phone: 1' 639-4171. • .en STAFF CON Tic Keith PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: • We have reviewed the proposal and have no objectio ns rr to it. !: Please contact _ of our. office. • • Please refer to the; enclosed 1e t to r. �. Written Comments s k2: � ' � �G-'"f' ' P� 1 1.-te ( 1_2,___LLI:v_LLELLE14,4 (act, • Ce P -4-va /9--de , � .. � . � C� W� GI r faktcP r+ .,C city: `, s'•C( t e_ /c4 w a s c e fretw ± Name o Person Commetting. Ccerf Phone No V ((11a tn/3521 1/4-/e-5 • A r AV u' ' ' ,, ' '''': '11, '''''''' ' ' '-' :' '''''' '''''''': :'ds: .,. _+-�. µ,_".. ._.,..,...,...,....L,...i>. ...... _, ,v ',. . , , W�� `N�QFhQQ T7 �� A4hI �G ORGANIZATION � � . . , The ,Tone meeting c f NFG I''� took puce can the 2.2nd tt i°:'rca pn rrtt� Chair, Fcp : i n' called i meeti n~ fi order N Mem: e�e i n attendance' were u Schmidt and, Takahashi, Although i ? _ � a r « - _ quorum e • ' decided to mec=t to hear, FaI"'t'' gel"t'L- i:;iCcanw1. 1:.and r'tei ghlac ri ac'c: d i,npist 'from ' guests.- 7.€ ;: were nrn )t ty, 'Bill den ah. r N Cir i rpep : ?, , Randy 's , il de " and F':eht Waymire, ' The m 1 rULe� o f the pr evi ous meeting '(May 1,8)'' �e�r ~pprover ' as cirte'cLt:Ia`l:edn •" We d(c:i.ded itc:a shift the agenda. i to 1 ; to aac:ccammad e the, c�?.,tes�':s P'', ' and deve;l d,pc r in r_;: t'endGanc p, A S'y1"itops w of the d =. ci i s 7i on, •foil w tt . :,,, AFrfcard O/aEero deVel caper- Ken Wymzire , Tii i '. , I s a 109 :i c t dewc 1 cape z rrt 1,teat er, at 15400 'SW 1 t1 1 Bi yc1,p It ' ' has a•, zerte change' reciue 5t rem PH7 to R-"77 'Pt) cver1 ayu Them,' lha s , request is can the city 's park to' re-align 'some of :hc it ntr r..i ralr '5 t1'"'e .it "s "fc•7r re-,.submission, The NE`Q 16 kdd ',^-4.1 'bo'.h p1 its Irai. .h our ' ' r who occupy homes in n adjacent st di vi e i an n The:, i ' " . • o:l :i dt':I rtcl recoMmel"ici 4ti.or7w-> emerged ' f f"tam CILtr 'di sc:uesi ran p :i'1=" Place - • mera'1•: of a way', Stop. sigh : X32nd .and SW f1sh+Oitd ftr-1 f •i� 2 , „ . l' .l wit errter'7i caralyi cF«a . e,a art1�' G ,! 8i ± ar�d 'Ashford f Drive. 5a 'Speed signs ! V ltiiiChildrer ", »„ pl a' ins 'be posted j'" , f: �- traffic' onset development F:2 gf'r1 [. r("' '}.. ,J 1�• '.a i•• patterns„' G: ...r �.'}�.. L. �.1 Y.....l. •�.. rr� �•' "C, ». t»1 »I 1'.I. ;rl "r:'} •�ri r.� I .1! 1 .la�.« •l• c � 'a �"� � i r " 1 . 7 e� „1 -4. it n � •� I' g 4 Maintain as m: n y 1 r c?o y as possible t ca enhance r1e:i g li b o r h ca Q c:i ' :3h Other buSinersp Puget Corporation ion Park::ing expansion " {ill "c r ii n , r C p"es nt G n pupet Cr rpr �ati r , rppri ed hrcrc up ', i' - of several developments with regard ar"i".1 tt.:?' this,s p<ir"!•::i,ng1 e:dpa"4!t Si Or 'u , Tho owner c e willing tb grant �-�i n easement through .the parking G " : to c i ', C d C r w Cw greater' a7 : " 1 r ( � i ? SC- �" G' creek , and' plant more trees on the 'f'i.t:t id v ay for 1 c nd aC aiIi n i,, ' Hopkins questioned i f' a n impact was seen en the -F 1,oc d' way e a ; result Of the Bonita Br a "r improvement o" d : 1 :a' ' C s ; "g ' . . changes, No problem was No c b, tc °i rn wy "� \ ci , d w regarding the' new' plan a r beaded f for hearings i rr s ef � i c e, i ) l • „ a Staff to ' }, r Ql d bhsi neeea C t f � r response to "member � w r ' � c � ir " f r � c " " � cc « e seal a c;:'k:i.v 4: septic w G k r"I i'a: and tree " «t t yr 1 C r i ? C enforcement.' ' . Brad Roast , : repe:ti" from the City • 11 c r d n' ra c :ntr Mted ' by .,• 'Cr ai g « rp ins H reported that there was i1 c f:l hoc t I'n the tank when they did a test 10-12' do wn> The tank was : tmps d nd 1, filled with concrete, rhe ii t! i ' sati ' aC „o' V aw• t Gtui 1{:I1 r'iti.:} l:' 1., =:5it,1 h The Court•k:y . e'S°•f i.c:i,a1s say that any e.l"t:ic t riI,,, Ii1e v:i,rig ' , service" . : , , . ' , s;:erv:i,cx " must be pumped ,,,d y destr"oyed or f'il'led in , rtr removed,: 1 '' ' . There G was rtca reply 'on the tree cut•t:i.ring t r"lii.If14nr u I I, . NeW bu i ne�ae: : p .c l I This i t tone amendment' c ? . ; � i �y t h owners of the property err Carman, Drive owned i")y 't lw►.'w i' er m '4 r i i c',: The'y' T zone 4m tnciment wn►it'd allow ty"rans±srib hr a `>i.rici (mcte1.-hc i ei. ) ' :t C " this a 1 h w „ t y t C r r f; b lt l r 4. o~ l 7 ;h e area. No Objections 1 n ti•1:..t: d'N ' available' 1' 7 h' 'General "eY ! e " " Y report . r 1 } '`�» ;i.1"t l rl i"�t haf :� I"'C a��:i ?t�C r»�t .0 n rt f C�l f"t r t i i"i.4 r 15»I�t r t�X41"»i b 1"t meetings,: �h i v, • • • • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS , • TO: , , DATE: 0, 1988 FROM: Tigard Planning Department � RE: SDR 88-12/SL 88-02 To eland an existing industria1. buildina by 20000 . • , square feet and to locate a portion of a, park • v within the 100 year flood plain. 7440 SW Bonita. Rd. (WCTM 2S1 12AC ' • . TL 600, 700, 800) Attached is the Site Plan and applicants statement for your review. From info>rmation supplied by various ;'departments and agencies and from other ,�� information available to ' our staff, a ' report and recommendation will be • prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by May 20 , 19 88 You may use the space provided , below czr• attach..a separate letter to return your comments. �/o�i area n to respond by the'above date_, please phone the staff contact'noted belov with . your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as, possible. If • you have any questions regarding this matter, ` contact the Tigard Planning, Department, P.O. Box 23397,,• 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. Phone: 639-4171. • STAFF CONTACT: , Keith Liden PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWI NG ITEMS THAT APPLY: ,. We h ave reviewed ewed t he proposal and have no ob j t t�ons to it. I , Please contact of our office. Please .refer to the enclosed letter. ,u4 Written Comments: • I .' .-..,....... f 1 Name o f Person n' fo mme nti n g• .... . • on/3521P •��7 , • I .. Vi-i n,a.._n.. •n...._._ .-,. ..r.. ...w............... .. .._.._r_,....»,_......,»,,,....l.._.......,,....,,....w.,.,N,l.,..,.«..,,r,.A .<.,...,=r,.,,.«,.. ,.,,n, .n, ...A,..,..w,. .+-., .;,., ...VA.,.,il.a.,.a _,... , / APPLICATION FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL AND -� A SENSITIVE LANDS PERMIT ON BEHALF OF, PUGET CORPORATION OF OREGON Puget Corporation of Oregon seeks site development review approval and a sensitive lands permit to allow for the expansion of the existing manufacturing facility at 7440 S.W. Bonita Road. , . The applicant is not requesting any variance from the established Community Development Code of the City of Tigard. Puget Corporation has operated in Tigard since 1969 making plastic injection molded products that are utilized by hi-tech companies throughout the Western United States. The company has experienced substantial growth since expanding the physical : facility last in 1984. With the approval of SDR 8-84, the total - building area increased to approximately 29, 500' square feet. At the time, the company estimated that the largest manufacturing shift would involve thirty employees. Today, because of the success of the company, an additional expansion of 20,000 square feet of manufacturing area is required to allow for projected day shift, the largest shift, of seventy-seven employees. The Site The site is at the corner of Bonita Road and 74th Avenue within an Industrial Park (I-P) zone. Properties to the north and east are within a Light Industrial (I-L) zone, property to the south is zoned I°-P, while, land on the opposite side of Fanno west, is zoned for residential use. The. , Creek, to the w residential ►.� proposal involves the removal of one residential structure along with the demolition of the garage portion of a second residence. The site plan shows that the structure which will remain is within an area that has potential for future development. The properties which are the subject of this application are • identified as Washington County Tax Map 2S 1 12AC, tax lots 600, the Count 700 , and 800. The tax maps dentif g� n � as identifiers have changed since 1984 a County e • r its maps. Total han e s�.nc has undertaken project to renumber res. Building covera acreage involved in the project is 4.41 acres. coverage is well below in an I P zone as only.low the allowed s ' e 49on00 11,owed tnaxitrium �. square feet of building area is proposed. This represents only twenty-six per cent of the total lot area. 'I • Parking ".2o acCOmodate t h e in crease in wor t force, Puget is propoSing to. add, fifty-seven new parking spaces to the thirty three spaces 1 • 4 which presently exist. The new spaces, as shown on the plan, , • , will be constructed at three I locations: eleven n along the west side of the addition, eighteen along the eastk and twenty ei ght t o the south of the addition. Spaces on the west will b e , ac ce sse d from t he nor th by a on e w ay l ne, sixteen foot wider { • I I I I I I I . Q ' _ ,..x., .r a a.... ._..._ . ..•...... , ....u._ .. +... r.Ja,,:.°a.r..,....a.,,.._.,r. _ r.....:•w.r_r+ _ ,.,r a. ' 'i{n • requiring exiting from the rear of the property onto 74th Avenue. The drive along the rear of the addition will be via an eighteen foot lane that borders the natural area that will be retained. Parking expansion is a major component of the project. Although the spaces provided in 1984 complied with City code, . parking availability has been a problem, particularly during the time period ust before and immediately after a shift change. The new plan will provide for a total of ninety spaces. Since the City requires a ratio of one space per employee on the largest shift, the ninety spaces will be well in excess of the spaces needed for the seventy-seven employees projected for the • , the largest shift, the day shift. Landscaping ; a , , The 1984 expansion plan included new landscaping along the p g g . north and west sides of the building. The north landscaping includes a planting strip along the sidewalk and trees at the northeast . corner of the building at a location where employees ` \ now occasionally gather for their breaks or lunch. Fanno Creek provides a natural buffer between the buildings and the adjacent residential area, zoned R-12. The natural barrier created by the creek was deemed in 1984 to be sufficient to fulfill "the buffer and screening requirements of the City code. Chapter 18.100 of the Community Development Code requires that developments within • zones designated I-P zone adjacent to, a R-12 zone provide for a 411 20-foot wide landscaped buffer. The floodplain which exists between the present and proposed building measures approxima4:44.1y 40 feet, In 1984 the Planning staff found that the width of the natural buffer, coupled with a plan to provide three or four side of the building, met b willow trees along the west sid � t the intent � � ; � ', of the code. The staff found that this approach was a suitable �,, alternative solution to the screening provisions. r t The 1988 expansion plan provides for a continuation of the 1984 approach. Puget proposes to continue maintenance of the floodplain without alteration. The building will be constructed . , . along th:. sa me line as th e existing facil ity without e ncroachment r into the floodplain. Additional willow trees will be planted consistent with the 1984 plan to break up the appearance of the building wall from the viewing point of the apartments. In addition, construction plans K_ add owed the� exposed ta.on cal 1 for the Conk rac,t�or to hydroseed ` p slopes that are not scheduled to be landscaped. x - Landscaping also proposed within the t hr ee parking areas • whacYare p Xanned as part of the 1988 _ ' building expansion. The landscaping plan will meet Wi th th Cat y standards which call for one n e 'tree per seven parking spaces. The trees will be panted along the periphery of the south lot and adjacent to th'a building on r k; the,west and east sides. Street trees consistent With ,City code, a minimum caliper of 2 inches will � be preserved � Will be Tantot�►d Vision sxr�n clearance p s �a at 4 feet access . � t ; � , wi rved at all acc oints site Ionsistent With the City code. j h, • • Tigard's Comprehensive Plan inventory data does not identify wr this property as a location containing a wildlife habitat. In addition, the Army Corps recently reviewed plans for the development and did not raise any concerns in this area. Although not part of the landscape plan, on site loading and the placement of trash receptacles affect, the appearance of a commercial or industrial site. The loading dock will be relocated from the present location at the southeast corner of • the building, facing 74th Avenue, ' to the rear of the proposed' addition. The new loading dock will face to the south with the southerly end of the loading area a full 130 feet from the rear property line. Lighting wi,11 be installed on the south Fide of the building to illuminate the loading area. The lighting that . will be provided will be oriented to avoid to the adjacent, g residential uses. Relocation of the loading dock area from the east side will allow for the placement of the trash receptacle into the area now serving as the loading dock. Presently the trash receptacle in placed. on pavement to the east of the building. This change vemen should allow for better outside storage of pallets and a better appearance from the street. - Half-Street Improvements . � will -. half-street Puget Corporation i l l construct standard improvements along 74th Avenue as a continuation of the e improvements made in 1984. Sensitive Lands is required whenever a project i re a , A sensitive lands permit s p P 9 involves an alteration to the flood plain. The City has identified the 135 foot elevation as the limit of the flood ,' which is proposed n • alteration �� c�pc�sed will not a : . . . affect the plain. The alte n vah contour of the exising flood plain nor will it restrict flood flow or retention. Puget Corporation is proposing to construct a parkin area which will encroach, into the 135 foot elevation of the flood plain at three locations. At each point of ac parking be built i in, a way t however, � k g tbe' done by encroachment, the ar � � This will present contour. will conform to the that, a. ua.l, 'C'o hmen r r � � inches to allow the placement of p le � for excavating appro�a,mately six inc rock and two inches for paving The parking surface shaped to materials.s.. will be sha o the existing contour. The en T stin e e_ p g n:t.our end r` suit will be a parking l. ot that includes a sma ll area sub 3 ec t to oeriadic flooding, The actual area involved isslig h aepart of twelve ,parking spaces will be subject to flooding in the event of a one hundred Y ear storm. copy rop" . d develo submitted to the ose : . . •, ° Arm. Corp syof In q irteers for review. C was A of the development plan wa .• �' : g,� : .. _ ,�hQ osed improvement ned that Army � . The Corps his determined no permit w:,11 be needed since the pr p pr will hot impact the wetland . , tte... dated May 4 / 1988) . The corps ° • • • nd (See letter da i ; I I ' .,F.,,.,..µa_ ,I, ,.ad......, ,„ -,. .. ,........,.,.i„_.....,......,..,,..+., t ..s....u..-.—.l G.-,.......:.,•u..,.,..-i-..-..,.-,.:t»z.,. ,,....,.,.,..«....I,.._.+.�...,....,....,.. ....,-,. .,. .w .....,.nx..., ....,-, - .. n ' , I - «:.». rJH... :.I... 4,_ 1...Mi.-. ...:],•,-.+.r..:+++w..w....w..'Jwa..n+,.a..,_.l..fl.A..7'.•»,.... ....wu,.-,., .. ...., tx . conducted an earl'er site inspection at the request of Puget when a preliminary concept was under consideration in February, 1988. The Corps routinely provides a copy' of all filings to the Division of StateLands. No comments have been received from the State to date. u The plan a s presented meets the criteria found xn Section °on . 18.84.040 of Tigard's Community Development Code. The criteria which are met are as follows: 1) Land form alterations shall preserve or enhance the flood plain storage function and maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway shall not result in any narrowing of the floodway boundary. • The land form alteration which is proposed will preserve the flood plain storage function and will not narrow the floodway boundary. Only a small part of the parking area will encroach into the A ; ” flood plain with the parking area built to conform to the present contours of the land. 2) The land form alteration or development within the 100-year flood plain shall be allowed only in an area designated as commercial ox industrial on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The subject site is designated for . Industrial Park, I-P, use on the City Land Use Map. 3) The land form alteration or development' is not located in the floodway. ;I I AS state in response condition No. 1 above, the • d ' ' po e to c:ondi�.t'on encroachment into the flood plain is very slight. Th e proposal calls for parking area to be built It below the 135 foot, elevation. The alteration is far from the flood way. I I 4) The land form alteration or development will not result , in any' increase In h r ase the elevation of the zero-foot rise floodway. L . The land form alteration will not affect the zero foot rise .floodway. r 5) The land form alteration or development plan p t.ria y accordance zncla�c�es a edes Lle �. at n/bc p hway in acc nce • with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. The City staff has indicated ' that the pathway planned 1pa development Fanno Creek near ar thisn I site w1 lkeo�nstucte r along the West side of the Creek, adjacent to the multi-family. .. - cr e ad,�� residential M • I I ' e'li.L.u.xl....rl..l-=+r+..r.n.... ., .rl,••...,...d'Jro.•,a•. ,.n..n,r«,u..., n.xµ.-...r./k.•....,er...m.a....N.wrr-.r4..r„r..r.L.:.,.,.......i.,..l.J'•.?..1',•«• •»-..-.1'no-e,.......-.N4.•+.i;.,..4...,si.»-..0-w... a%.'.-u..r:J cA.kl•wl.-Lr:1 w.tA,:f..P.jr:.r.:.urr.:w:l+:-In.4,..r r:b<:Ue1MAIA.4'Wlart.arra•.• ..,• f r p q t 1i. use:. , Therefore, a pathway is k .� required as part of this development plan. 6) The plans for the pedestrian/bicycle pathway indicate that no pathway will be below the ;? elevation of an average annual flood. ♦ - As stated in response to condition. No. 5 above, nc� `' pathway is proposed along Fanno Creek adjacent to the Puget Corporation development. ` Future Plans The site plan as presented illustrates the preservation of an existing house located on the southeast portion of the property, The residential use with a yard and four trees will be preserved for an unknown period of time. Pavement areas will extend up to the area, surrounding the residence. Half street t,l improvements will., however, be made along the entire frontage of tax lot 800 on 74th Avenue. The site plan contains a notation that there is potential for eleven additional parking spaces ;' within this area. No plans have been formulated for this portion of the property. In the future this property has the potential to be developed to accomodate a stand alone facility with self contained landscaping and parking for a use compatible to, or separate from, the primary use. Access to this property would be made from the Puget Corporation parking area. No additional street access to this segment of the property is anticipated. ? • • • � r I l� • I x • I I ry r • • I I F •, I I 5 f' 11 • • • ✓ - ♦ r • ,.M1. r,..".., .,..,. 'i ...... i., . .,,:-YI• _—.....__,..,.....,. ...�_t.... ... .x.....,A.....r...wa. Y,-a.r.... ,. ...J:.— _.l ..1,_ 4 ati • • • • • REQ ST FOR COMMENTS •I • • • TO: T � DA E 1988 S May 10 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SDR 88-•12/SL 88-02 To expand an existing industrial buildi.lg hry 20, 000' _ square' feet and to locate a portion of a parking and drivewa 'area within the 100 year flood plain. 7440 SW Bonita Rd. (WCTM 2S1 12AC TL 6000 700, 800) • • Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's' statement for your review. From ' pp departments and agencies from other information supplied by various b v encies and fro information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. , If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by. May 20 , 19, X88 . You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. " '' if you are unable , to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If ' , you have and questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Departments P.O. Bob 23397, 13125' SW Hall' Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. Phone: •f 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Keith Liden ° PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: XX We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. r Please contact of our office, Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Came ents It would be ex �.0 • or architect noted the location; of ,:..4 ',. - 0 •- 1e... 4t • Avenue. How about a yieix it ma tax 'he T or a lot number • an existing 12" main along SW 74th Avenue some of which due a • e rebate to those property 'owners paid for/earlier. I apears that _. . with fire hydran:tS (and possibly ,sprinkler system) later al mains/will hav e to be i nstal 1 e toward the buildi t� comply ly �' with city fire code: Otherwise, I believe tie, deyelo imen.t c.an h the � � . be served adequately, Name' of Person Com memting. .Phone No. 6 3 9-155. 4 I r 8841 3r521t, mcIABD, O ooN 9/2gg • r • • • • , REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO: DATE:I May 10, 1988 FROM: Tigard Planning Department I RE: SIR 88-12 SL 88-02 To Q and an existin industrial buildir� b 20000 RED � � 4 Y , square feet and to locate a portion of a arki.ng and ve�ra� area within t h e 100 y e a r flood plain. 7440 SW Bonita Rd. (c IM 2S1 12AC TL 600, 700, 800) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other ti information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wise' to comment on this application, we need your comments by May 20 , 19 You array use the. space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. if yota are, unable to res o by the above date,. please phone the staff .contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, P.O. Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. Phone: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Keith Liden PLEASE', CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact .. .. of our office. ► Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: OtJNTyr ON l InDISTRI DISTRICT . 1 '. GENE Bo GHI L WASMriG • er 5Q. 3 e4t 95� 5l7 r AYOp a:,n 9 7 Blanton Stre of Person Commenting:-. . Jaime .. .. . � 1 „u ,. Phone No W /: ' • I I t � I en/. 21P • • . J REQUEST FOR OMME.NTS • . TO: DATE: May l0, 198$ FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SDR 88-12/SL 88-02 To expand an existing industrial. building by 21 000 square feet and to locate a portion of a parking and drivel area • within the 100 year flood plain. 7440 SW &.nita Rd. (WCTM 2S1 12AC TL, 600, 700, 800) . Attached is the Site. Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will` be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by May 20 , 19 88 _. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to, return your comments. Ifrnu are unable to respond by the above date , please phone the staff contact noted below with F Y p p ' your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If , you have Any questions regarding this , matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, : P.O. pox 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. phone: 639-4171 STAFF CONTACT: T<eith Liden PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: .. We have r eviewed ,d the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: 'zm ✓�y ' ^'y" t C.`.. .V7,r ' 1.3 d5✓' e ✓`,J�i ll',"�"✓" .v' i.,.,!�'4"... >"i�. 'r.7i(/.4�.y� Alb e, 'C, r"k .ter /°` ."' • Nate of Person Commenting: . Phone N o. A 01/1521A) fr v , �.� • .....,_. _, ., _ ._ ,,,, -.: ,w .x... I.....,..._.... .. _ .._ ., .,,1.•._ _. IL.-..r,..A ..A._ ......,.... . . ..,. ...,.,. ......h• .ter.-,., ..w..........,[.. _.f.,,,_. ; ' • APPLICATION FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL AND A SENSITIVE LANDS PERMIT ON BEHALF OF� . .;Y ,• . PUGET CORPORATION OF OREGON , r Puget Corporation on of Oregon seeks site development review . approval .r and a sensitive lands ,permit to allow for the expansion of the existing manufacturing facility at 7440 S.W. Bonita Road. The applicant is not requesting any variance from the established Community Development Code of the City of Tigard. Puget Corporation has o e rated in Tigard d s i nce 1969 making plastic injection molded products that are utilized by hi-techj companies throughout the Western United States. The company has, experienced substantial growth since expanding the physical facility last in 1984. With the approval of SDR 8-84, the total building area increased to approximately 29,500 square feet. At i the time, the company estimated that the largest manufacturing shift would involve, thirty employees. Today, because of the success of the company, an additional expansion of 20,000. square feet of manufacturing . area is r' projected e u+a.red to allow for a g ��, day shift, the largest shift, . of seventy-seven employees. Nr . The Site The site is at the corner of. Bonita Road and 74th Avenue within an Industrial Park (I-P) zone. Properties to the north and east are within a Light Industrial (I-IL) zone, property to the south is zoned 1-P, while land on the opposite side, of Fanno . • involves , is zoned for r sdential use. � The � proposal C o r residential T i removal of one residential structure along with the demolition of the garage portion of a second residence. The site • plan shows that the structure which will remain is within an area that has potential for future developments of this application The properties Which are the .subject �� this a �.�. � � are id0 ified as Washington County Tax r , t+ dent Map 2S 1 12AC, aX lots 600, 700, and 800. The tax map identifiers have changed since 1984 as thouninvolved yh undertaken a+project to renumber its maps. .iota l eeC g in the prOject is 4.41 acres. Building coverage is an I P zone only 49,500 square lfeet lof building in a c��ie as onl maximum s proposed. This represents only twenty-six per cent of the total lot area. ' 1 Parking To force, Puget Y s proposing.. accomodate the increase in work � � � _ � � �� ,. arc: k fore u et i. toicadd fifty-fifty-seven new parking spaces to the thirty-three. spaces p g plan, y The new spaces, as shown on the,, will be constructed at three locations: eleven along the west side of the addition, eighteen along the east, and twenty eight �. the South toe tithe addition Spaces oh the w. will be S a west w` ' 4 , north by a one-way lane, s ikteen foot, wide, • requiring exiting from the rear of the property onto 74th Avenue. The drive along the rear of the addition Will be via an eighteen • foot lane , that borders rd ers the 'natural area that. a t' will be retained. • Parking expansion is a major component of the project. A lthough the spaces p rovid ed ?.n 1984 complied with City. code, - parking availability has been a problem, particularly during the ' time period just before and immediately after a shift change. The new plan will provide for a total of ninety spaces. Since the City requires a ratio of one space per employee on the largest shift, the ninety spaces will, be well in excess of the spaces needed for the seventy-seven employees projected for the the largest shift, the day shift. Landscaping , The 1984 expansion plan included new landscaping along the north and west sides of the buildings The north landscaping " includes a planting strip along the sidewalk and trees at the ' northeast corner of the. building at a location where employees I` now occasionally gather for their breaks or lunch. Fanno Creek provides a natural buffer between the buildings and the, adjacent residential area, zoned The natural by w l ar . R-12. tall barra.er created b the . � y creek was deemed in 1984 to be sufficient to fulfill the buffer and screening requirements of the City code. Chapter "18.100 of the Community Development Code requires that developments Within esi nated I-P zone adjacent to a R-12 zone , g j The flood plain e ptova.he for a ' I zones d 20-foot wide landscaped buffer. e floc plain whic exists . between the present and proposed building measures approximately 40 feet, In 1984 the Planning staff found that the width of the natural buffer, coupled with a plan to provide three or four willow trees along the west side of the building, met the intent of the code. The staff found that this approach was a suitable alternative solution to the screening provisions. rovisions. ' f The 1988 expansion plan provides continuation of the 1984 approach. Puget prop e proposes tocontinuemaintenance of the ' s - ed • . p� alteration. The building � flood �ain without a ding wall be constructed along lg the same line as the existing facility without encroachment fl the floodplain. Additional willow trees will be planted Y .. with k t.•. i cca.lda.nentwallf�oe 1984 plan to break appearance o � Ie .. a a up he f � th building j g from the+viewing point of the apartments. In h d sloe call not scheduled to to addition, the construction plans cal for the con l � �aynrr�se�d all exposed slopes that are l.c landscaped. Landscaping is also proposed w„i t h�n the three pa y 'x inC areas which are planned as part of the 198 8 building expansion. landscaping p lan will meet with City standards which call for one parking '� . an tree per seven arkx.r7g spa.ce5. the trees will be planted along %' the. periphery of the south lot and adjacent to the ''L'tilding� on r ' the west and east sides inches Street trees c©nsi.sten�:, with City',,code, W eet tree a minimum caliper of 2 inches at 4 feet, will be planted. Vision .; p. . points to the clearance will be reserved at all access p he site consistent with the City code. 2 • Tigaz d s Comprehensive Plan inventory data does not identify tl f' y this property as a location containing a wildlife habitat. In addition, the Army Corps recently reviewed plans for the development and did not raise any concerns in this area. Although not part of the landscape plan, on site loading and the placement of trash receptacles affect the appearance of a , commercial or industrial site. The loading dock will be relocated from the present location at the southeast corner of the building, facing 74th Avenue, to the rear of the proposed addition. The new loading dock will , face to the south with the southerly end of the loadin area a. full 130 feet from the rear property $ line. Lighting will be installed on the south side of .. ,I � � g' g the building to illuminate the loading area. The. lighting that will be provided will be oriented to avoid glare to the adjacent residential uses. . will Relocation o.�, the loading dock area from the east side w1, allow for the placement of the trash receptacle into the area now serving ' as the loading dock. Presently the trash receptacle in placed on pavement, to the east of the building. This change should allow for better outside storage of pallets and a better a p pe arance from street. Half-Street Improvements ti I Puget Corporation will construct standard half-street improvements along 74th Avenue as a continuation of the improvements made in 1984.. , Sensitive Lands A sensitive lands permit is required whenever a prof involves an alteration to the flood plain. The City has 4 . identified the 135 foot elevation as the limit of the flood plain. The alteration which' is proposed Will not affect the contour of the exising flood plain nor will it restrict flood flow or retention. Puget Corp o ration is proposing to c o s truCta parking area which will encroach into the 135 foot elevation of the flood plain at, three location' 3. At each point of encr :.. built in a w ea��leconforQ�to�the the contou� will l bo built x way that w parking r. This will be done by , excavating the to placement. .. approximately P a s l.ow - r the o al . rock inche . .. ,n materials. The parking surface six and t�w P .. � � � inches for. av`a�� will will . result e a parking slot that �includ small areaethat, is tai� the es subject to er are . �� The actual � ... involved , periodic flooding. h . � a a.nvt�lv�ed� .is �sl slight a�� part of ; twelve parking spaces will be subject to flooding in the event of I a one hundred year storm. ve l o meet plan an A C opy of the proposed de, p was submitted to the I '� Army The has determined that y � Co�'ps of Engineers for.. review, e corps a �;ned th no per „ will be needed since the proposed improvement tit . cement wall not impact the wetland (see letter dated May 4, 1988) . Me Corps , r....,. ...w...v...,•.„a.vt:,.,.0 a..r.r_ ,r•..k...Ur,.r.....r._I m.wn.4ur..-. .•IJ..k..,r:.aWu..tat' r,etra{..a...,, . (■ conducted an ear r r site inspection at the request of Puget when a preliminary concept was under consideration in February, 1988, The Corps routinely provides a copy of all filings to the Division of StateLandss No comments have been received from the, State to date. The plan as presented meets the criteria found in Section 18. 84.040 of Tigard's Community Development Code. The criteria which are met are a' k• l lows: 0 1) Land form alterations shall preserve or enhance the • flood plain storage function and maintenance of the . • zero-foot rise floodway shall not result in any narrowing of the floodway boundary. The land form alteration which is proposed will • I preserve the flood plain storage function and will not narrow the floodway boundary. Only a small part of the parking area will encroach into the • flood plain with the parking area built to conform to the present contours of the land. I a 2) The land 1 ) and form alteration. or development within the 100-year flood plain shall be allowed only in an area designated as commercial or industrial on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The subject site is designated for Industrial Park, I-P, use on the City Land Use Map. 3) The land form alteration or development is not . , located in the floodway. As stated in response to condition No. 1 above, the encroachment into the flood plain is very slight. The proposal x calls'°for ark?n area to built 6 . P P P � g t be below the 135 foot elevation. The alteration is #;! far from the flood way`. 4) The land form alteration or development will not tin any in d ,. • result increase the elevation of the zero-foot rise floodway. The land form alteration will not affect the, zero-- foot rise floodway. 5) The land form alteration or . development plan includes withthe ado rin�bic' pedestrian/bicycle pathway in accordance adopted pedestrian/bicycle ycle pathway plan planned for development indicated that the pathway The City staff has in p along Fanno Creek near this r' wall constructed along the west side of tt g sate be oo tructed aloe creek, a j ent to the multi-family d ac reslrlenta.al d R • , 4;77'. I ' , as u.....1.,.,...-..« ...t.a....., w.,.„x: a.s...w.rr+.. ,... ....r. n. ..t ..,'X. .i: t ♦.... xw. • • 'i.'M+-.s.. ...:..., . . _ , ... ....,.'-,-.-;.......» :,..,.•,,.a.,:.,...a.«.-.:..<,..,,....+.......:.......+.«a.,.+ .r c«..„-...:i. .,Io-_ ..:.M:.. i.4-..s...4+. .J.,c..a ...w-,. .:,.uw.::..,..,.:-4J.:.u.a,..r......,.Jl..„.i�a . use Therefore, a pathway is required as part of this development plan. ; 6) The plans for the pedestrian/bicycle pathway indicate that no pathway will be below the elevation of an average annual flood. As stated in response to condition No. 5 above, noG`' pathway is proposed along Fanno Creek adjacent to the Puget Corporation development, Future Plans The site plan as presented illustrates the prewservaLion of an existing house located on the southeast portion of the property. The residential use with a y yard and four trees will be preserved for an unknown period of time. Pavement areas will extend up to the area surrounding the residence. Half street improvements Will , however, be made along the entire frontage of tax lot 800 on 74th Avenue. The site plan contains a notation that there , 'is potential for eleven additional parking spaces ,, within this area. No plans have been formulated for this portion A of the property. In the future this property has the potential to be developed to accomodate a stand alone facility with self contained landscaping and parking for a use compatible to, or separate from, the primary use. Access to this property would be made. from the Puget Corporation parking area. No additional ' street access to this segment of the property is anticipated. + • • , r k• I . q .lau.u,;....n�... - ....w r._w.....w,.,..4=. ,G.,Ml 4_...-u•,.u...,:u.......-:«.'..._.,..,-...:M,.....,.nJJ....,:.....,a.l u,:FL-,.k...,:.'...:,....,o,u+..h,l,a«,.,.R.. ..»u..4.... ,..iu..u,s.-3a.Ikt...,.-.,;h,w...tN,«.w,..,...k,.,:.,.r-,dlu✓FSu...,.t.u..a+.:.:.:,._:,...«,.,-1 i........3�.w..u+.n..:.,:lw.r,•-.l.,a� Aa,.a..MW..i..r'ia,w...,.u;.•,,,,,. • PLACE UNDER CITY OF `f'IGARD LOGO The following will Fvtic� considered by the Tigard Hearings Officer on Wednesday, • June 8, 1988, at 7:00 P.M, at Tigard Civic Center - Town Hall, 18125 CW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon, . Both public oral and written testimony is invited, �! • The public hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance with the rules of Chapter 18.32 of the Tigard Municipal. Code, and rules and procedures (_, of the Hearings Officer, Further information may be obtained from the • Planning Division at 18125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon 97223, or by calling 619-4171- t—awrr��r ,auwA+ha, y' SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88-12 C1C �.L PfNI.NT .�L-V1=i�U1 Sg12 88�--1. SENSITIVE LANDS $L 88.02 Request by Puget Corp, of Oregon to expand an existing isting industrial building by 20,000 square feet and to locate a portion of a parking aivi driveway area • within the 100 year flood plan, Zone: I-P (Industrial Park) , Location: 7440 . SW Bonita Road (WCTTM 281 12AC, Tax Lot 600, 700, 800) , • TT PUBLISH 5/26/88 Prepared by: Reviewed by: r.( , 19, �1,, ht/4828D • • • • • • • WILLIAM A. MONAHAN ATTORNEY AT LAW 12300 S.W.MAIN STREET TI('ARI).OEEiC ON 437223 . ' 1503f(339-8900 May 9 , 1988 Keith Liden, Senior Planner City of Tigard 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon . RE. Puget Corporation of Oregon - Landscaping Plan Dear Keith: . m Enclosed please find the landscaping plan proposed as part of the application of Puget Corporation of Oregon for a site development review approval and sensitive lands permit Please note that the application deviates from the 1984 plan as it does • not provide for street trees along Bonita Road. The 1984 plan r showed seven red maples within the planting strip between the . parking lot and street. The trees were never installed due to a change in plans necessitated by the City half-street improvement policy. The 1984 plans were submitted at a time that Puget was under ' the impression that the company would be able to delay • constructing half-street improvements until formation of a LID in I the future. The City Council denied Puget's request for delaying � . installation of the improvements. As a result, construction " forced the narrowing of the planting strip. Rather than providing for a ten foot planting strip, Puget was able to construct only a two foot strip while constructing the parking area to City standards. The modified planting strip could not accomodate the street trees. Instead of street trees, a row of shrubs has been planted. In addition, a more intensive planting scheme was completed in , the area adjacent to the entrance to the office portion of the . facility. Some trees were also planted at the east and west end of the property along Bonita as well as at the northwest corner ,, of the building. The willows indicated .-„n the plan were not ” planted. Puget is prepared plant a Series of..wi l •s side !anted. to 1ow.� along the upper portion of the bank of the flood plain on the west i of the 1984 and 1988 additions. The 1988 additions to the plan include trees along additions plan ` e�: n.g thql , ° parking facilities as well as some„ . screening along t 74tk� sc g a the 74th Avenue side of the building. The Screening will help to obscure the outside Storage area for pal.l ets: • Please note that the 1988 plan which I am submitting heroin , does not attempt to show the total landscaping plan, as it .is °,tow ” and as it will be modified. Instead, I have endeavored to show • the changes proposed. Much of the landscaping is natural growth within the flood plain and along the edge of the property. The YO 1 II I I 1, • , 1 land to the south of the property provides a natural buffer as it is presently undeveloped and has limited p y p potential for economic use. The land is severely limited because of the location of I Fanno Creek as meanders through the property and intersects, I it t p believe, Ball Creek. As a result, there does not appear to be a �. need for the planting of new trees along the south edge of the f Puget property. I / I I I I I w Please advise me if you require further }:xpianation of the additions to the landscaping plan. Wi11liam AA Monahan • • I I I 1 Ii I I • I P I I I Y 1 II I I I i I I q - . t n d 4 1.,,...,.«...,...,,_........, .4a...............a,.,.,.,,,,._.w,.,..,.._,...u:,..,..,,,..u« .....,........,,....,,..«....,.,...M.,..,,_.......,. ...._....._.....»,,,.,.rt,.,.,..,.a„H.,,..,..,.,,.....,...,.,ww._..,i»,..._..,-........�..,a�;.a,. ...,.,4....,_„_._..:..»...M.,d..,.,.....—.M.,,;..:...w..?x..._..«,,, _......,•,.... :.,.u...,....,....�_..a.,._rv.... ».....w. ,9.,....._.'... r4.. APPLICATION FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, APPROVAL AND ; A SENSITIVE LANDS PERMIT ON BEHALF OF PUGET CORPORATION OF OREGON Puget Corporation of Oregon seeks site development review approval and a sensitive lands permit to allow for the expansion of the existing manufacturing facility facilit at 7440 S.W. Bonita Road. The applicant is not requesting any variance from the established Community Development Code of the City of Tigard. Puget Corporation has operated in Tigard since 1969 making elastic injection molded products that are utilized by hi-tech companies throughout the Western United States. The company has experienced substantial growth since expanding the physical facility last in 1984. With the approval of SDR 8-84, the total i building area increased to approximately 29 ,500 square feet. At . the ';.ime, the company c,stimated that the largest manufacturing sh,i±t would involve thirty employees. Today, because of the success of the company, an additional expansion of 20,000 square feet of manufacturing area is required to allow for a projected day shift, the largest shift, of seventy-seven employees. The Site The site is at the corner of Bonita Road and 74th Avenue ' within an Industrial Park (I-P) zone. Properties to the north and east are within a Light Industrial (I-L) zone, property to the south is zoned I-P, while land on the opposite side of Fanno Creek, to the west, is zoned for residential use. The proposal involves the removal of one residential structure along with the demolition of the garage portion of a second residence. The site • plan shows that the structure which will remain is within an area that has potential for future development. The properties which are the subject of this application are 7'. identified as Washington County Tax Map 2S l: 12AC, tax lots 600 , 700 , and 800 , The tax map identifiers have changed since 1984 as the County has undertaken a project to renumber its Maps. Total A acreage involved in the project ect is 4.41 acres. Building coverage is well below the allowed maximum in an I P zone as only 49,500 square feet of building area is pr oposed. This represents only twenty-six per cent of the total lot area parkin To accomodate the in increase work force, Puget is proposing �e o Ce to add fifty-seven new parking spaces to the thirty-three spaces which presently exist. The new spaces •as shown on the plan, will be constructed at three locations eleven along the, west .-- side of the addition, eighteen along the east, and twenty eight to the south of the addition. Spaces on the west Will, he accessed from the north by a one-way lane, sixteen foo t id/a r A- r • , • requiring exiting from the rear of the property onto 74th Avenue. The drive along the rear of the addition will be via an eighteen foot lane that borders the natural area that will be retained. Parking expansion is a major component of the project. Although the spaces provided in 1984 complied with City code, • parking availability has been a problem, partiLularly during the time period just before and immediately after a shift change. The new plan will provide for a total of ninety spaces. Since the City requires a ratio of one space per employee on the largest shift, the ninety spaces will be well in excess of the spaces needed for the seventy-seven employees projected for the the largest shift, the day shift. Landscaping. The 1984 expansion plan included new landscaping along the north and west sides of the building. The north landscaping includes a planting strip along the sidewalk and trees at the northeast corner of the building at a location where employees now occasionally gather for their breaks or lunch. Fanno Creek 0 provides a natural buffer between the buildings and the adjacent residential area, zoned R-12. The natural barrier created by the creek was deomed in 1984 to be sufficient to fulfill the buffer and screening requirements of the City code. Chapter 18.100 of - the Community Development Code requires that developments within zones designated I-P zone adjacent to a R-12 zone provide for a 20-foot wide landscaped buffer. The floodplain which exists • between the present and proposed building measures approximately 40 feet. In 1984 the Planning staff found that the width of the natural buffer, coupled with a plan to provide three or four willow trees along the west side of the building, met the intent of the code. The staff found that this approach was a suitable alternative solution to the screening provisions. The 1988 expansion plan provides for a continuation of the 1984 approach. Puget proposes to continue maintenance of the floodplain without alteration. The building will be constructed along the same line as the existing facility without encroachment t into the floodplain. Additional willow trees will be planted consistent with the 1984 plan to break Up the appearance of the building wall from the viewing point of the apartments. In addition, the construction plans call for the contractor to hydroseed all exposed slopes that are not scheduled to be landscaped. Landscaping is also proposed within the three parking areas which are planned as part of the 1988 building expansion. The landscaping plan will meet with City standards which call for one tree per seven parking spaces. The trees will be planted along the periphery of the south lot and adjacent to the building on•the west and east sides. Street trees consistent with City code, • . - a minimum Oaler of 2 inches at 4 feet, will be planted. Vision clearance will be preserved at all access points to the site consistent with the City code. c. v.4 1 • ,4 Tigard' s Comprehensive Plan inventory data does not identify this property as a location containing a wildlife habitat. In addition, the Army Corps recently reviewed plans for the development and did not raise any concerns in this area. Although not part of the landscape plan, on site loading and . , the placement of trash receptacles affect the appearance of a commercial or industrial site. The loading dock will be relocated from the present location at the southeast corner of the building, facing 74th Avenue, to the rear of the proposed addition. The new loading dock will face to the south with the • southerly end of the loading area a full 110 feet from the rear property line. Lighting will be installed on the south side of , the building to illuminate the loading area. The lighting that will be provided will be oriented to avoid glare to the adjacent residential uses. Relocation of the loading dock area from the east side will allow for the placement of the trash receptacle into the area now serving as the loading dock. Presently the trash receptacle in placed on pavement to the east of the building. This change 6 / should allow for better outside storage of pallets and a better appearance from the street. Half-Street Improvements Puget Corporation will construct standard half-street improvements along 74th Avenue as a continuation of the improvements made in 1984. Sensitive Lands A sensitive lands permit is required whenever a project . involves an alteration to the flood plain. The City has identified the 135 foot elevation as the limit of the flood plain. The alteration which is proposed will not affect the contour of the exising flood plain nor will it restrict flood 7 flow or retention. Puget Corporation is proposing to construct a parking area which will encroach into the 135 foot elevation of the flood plain at three locations. At each point of encroachment, however, the parking area will be built in a way• that will conform to the present contour. This will be done by \ I excavating approximately six inches to allow for the placement of rock and two inches for paving materials. The parking surface • will be shaped to the existing contour. The end result will be a parking lot that includes a small area that is subject to periodic flooding. The actual area involved is slight as part of twelve parking spaces will be subject to flooding in the event of a one hundred year storm. •. A copy of the proposed development plan was submitted to the Army Corps of Engineers for review. The Corps has determined that no permit will be needed since the proposed improvement Will not . N impact the wetland (see letter dated May 4, 1988) . The Corps rreo 11 ■ w u.. . .1,.� a .u., x i.... 1.,.,.. .._,.ti:w , .u..n ...,«�, . .w..... .... ...r.,. ,�...... w«.rv..,.. -�J.:«....n ,,,.,,.....,..wrJ.w..-w....a...,.n . .,I..:.1+..,' rH., «.�....I:.d ..— .1• M..wra , �—J ..,.-,,.» .,.X+,-.,.--d..• ,r�.:r< k,.,, ��Hi..'.,.ea.-., _ uit,.... .".•v:.r X1,,.4�, ..e.,...�tk • (:. •,r - conducted an earlier site inspection at the request of Puget when • a preliminary concept was under consideration in February, 1988. The Corps routinely provides a copy of all filings to the (-x, Division of StateLands. No comments have been received from the State to date. The plan as presented meets the criteria found in Section 1 ; 18. 84.040 of Tigard's Community Development Code. The criteria , is follows: wh h are et 'a e' as m r 1) Land form alterations shall preserve or enhance the Mr..,.r,.,,., flood plain storage function and maintenance of the w zero- foot rise se floodway shall not result in any narrowing of the floodway boundary. The , land form alteration which is proposed will preserve the flood plain storage function and will not narrow the floodway boundary. Only a small part of the parking area will encroach into the flood plain ;with' the parking area built to conform i'' to the present contours of the land. ., y 2) The land form alteration or development within the 100r yerar flood plain shall be allowed only in an area designated a s commercial or industrial real on the e Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. , The subject site is designated for Industrial Park, I-g, use on the City Land Use Map. • 3) The land form alteration or development is not located in the floodway. 1 1 As stated in response to condition No. 1 above, the encroachment into the flood plain is vety slight. The proposal calls for parking area to be built below the 135 foot elevation. The alteration is i far from the flood way. 4) The land form alteration or development will not • result in any increase in the elevation of the s zero-foot rise floodway. ' The land form alteration will not affect, the zero-: foot rise floodway. I 5) The land form alteration or develop pment plan. . includes a pedestrian/bicycle pathway in n accordance ;r with the adop ted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. The staff The City has, indicated that the pathway planned for development along Fanno Creek near this Site will be constructed along the west side of the creek, adjacent to the Multi-family residential • ' P 9 + .., ,ti.,u, M ,; .. ,:,1=:µ..H....,..a.,..,..Wu...,a_.,.,,.,...�....:,..�a..�.....,...w.,w.-a... ...,,....,w..»,.,.a..,......,«.«......�A..,....MAa,._.,..�.a�a._....,..«x..�....... � ' v} i rex C uses. Therefore, a pathway is not required as part of this development plan. 6) The plans for the pedestrian/bicycle pathway indicate that no pathway will be below the • elevation of an average annual, flood. •, As stated in response to condition No. 5 above, no pathway is proposed along Fanno Creek adjacent to the Puget Corporation development. Future Plans The site plan as presented illustrates the preservation of • an existing house located on the southeast portirr, of the property. The residential use with a yard and four trees will be preserved for an unknown period of time. Pavement areas will extend up to the area surrounding the residences. Half street improvements will , however, be made along the entire frontage of tax lot 800 on 74th Avenue. The site plan contains a notation that there is potential for eleven additional parking spaces within this area. No plans have been formulated for this portion of the property. In the future this property has the potential to he developed to accomodate a stand alone facility with self contained landscaping and parking for a use compatible to, or separate from, the primary use. Access to this property would be made from the Puget Corporation parking area. No additional street access to this segment of the property is anticipated. • • ' .,.,,. .....•,,.,,...,..., '.,, '.,.', ...:I-.,, .,......, . .. .„ . „,.., ,.., a ..,., .,.... ., .., . .,, . • • • • . , < ( WILLIA] A. MONAHAN ATTORNEY AT LAW 1.2200$.W.MAIN STV,EnT • TIGARD,OREGON 97223 (503)03043900 May 9, 1988 • Keith Liden, Senior Planner City of Tigard 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon RE: Puget Corporation of Oregon - Landscaping Plan Dear Keith: Enclosed please find the landscaping plan proposed as part of the application or: Puget Corporation of Oregon for a site development review app4.ova1 and sensitive lands permit. Please note that the application deviates from the 1984 plan as it does not provide for street trees along Bonita Road. The 1984 plan showed seven red m44.ples within the planting strip between the parking lot and street. The trees were never installed due to a change in plans necessitated by the City half-street improvement policy. The 1984 plans were submitted at a time that Puget was under 1. the impression that the company would be able to delay constructing half-street improvements until formation of a LID in the future. The City Council denied Puget' s request for delaying • installation of the improvements. As a result, construction forced the narrowing of the planting strip. Rather than providing for a ten foot planting strip, Puget was able to • construdt only a two foot strip while constructing the parking area to City standards. The modified planting strip could not • accomodate the street trees, Instead of street trees, a row of shrubs has been planted, • In addition, a more intensive planting scheme was completed in the area adjacent to the entrance to the office portion of the • facility. Some trees Were also planted at the east and west end of the property along Bonita as well as at the northwest corner of the building, The willows indicated on the plan were not planted. Puget is prepared to plant a series of willow along the upper portion of the bank Of the flood plain on the west Side of the 1984 and 1988 -dditions. The 1988 additions to the plan include trees along the parking facilities as well als some screening along the 74th • Avenue side of the building. The screening will help to obscure the outside storage area for pallets. • f Please note that the 1988 plan which I am submitting herein does not attempt 17.o show the total landscaping plan as it is now and as it will be mc-71iied. Instead, I have endeavored to show • the changes proposed. Much of the landscaping is natural growth within the flood plain and along the edge of th e property. Th The rw:n-/I'} . a.-44,4 4,4 4,. J•.4,-44444,4, n. 4.� 41.lw . 04,0 44441,r .44 4 14.171 41, Ma!add..rtet-rtte,e, r..,4t-t.c..w-.,,,4t,‘t tv+4�Lett 41 te4::Ir.IL. property provides a natural buffer as it P p y land to the south of the ro is presently undeveloped and has limited potential for economic used The land is severely limited because of the location of Panno Creek as it meanders through the property and intersects, z believe, Ball Creek. As a result, there does not appear to be a • need for the planting of new trees along the south edge of the Puget property. Please advise me if you require further explanation of the additions to the landscaping plan. I I , • I � r William A. Monahan I I tr I I ; •• ,� I I I I I I ., • I I i I / r......., , 5 1 I'lNl 1 1 f•fi, . , 1, , : .1. ,.. .,,,,,„„:„.,,.,„ 1 a! i Ii r ,•, ,�!,-, •` 3 1 ` Tr jfc ;i i?, cl'`I kd'z'iµA I * ay •. ' S ,I'.1 A'' N -ix K4, J4+ "' .P,or•�xPOlgi.w•PIOP '++w1o•+Pa wlavt Pwe*wanhmra.p w,•a � oiex'+ewFNwrru+nr +rWWtaVr.. rwlrWa�.rwk MerxNOa�nl�� ,, bk L •, (6-'"a.,4., . , , . at'r' I I }1 4' ` , j1.•l jy�••ypt4•,M1YiI,O•AMVIWI' �Irl'yY '' 9 9S 0.'.; • ' Irtil ,, '1 i tt a I o wl . 1 My IB ', " Fib Irar 9 r • �i 1 I d� r , I , � y• 1 7 I , + I +l, , ' v �' �' "�' 1 ' ' y X11 '' + / 1. li X iI3 - ,'ply IVTEb oiV NO,icidbil GLEAfPblN`te A Mir .. 1 I ;..b. I d, ',r ,,,, , ,. a...,l ..I - ......, .,' ..n '" I« i';. .. ,o,.°S P f F `'..;.,.•,`:,;,,,,,,Y.,,,,,,,,, ..:'f' ) Ail .. :. .. .. .. - �... - I-*Yr , y r t �P�F G o.Ytl w ' !" j N,, t .fi i„y ' .. . hurnrrnwY r r t .9 t k 1 u , +Na, 1 , ° T . 1 , .,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,.„,,, . ,,,,.„.,,,,,,,, e 1 'gin , R, N d '4 q r ., ;era r 41' I,i Ir r : 1�:f :A r.� ',”.. ..'W.i., trl' ' , ..., , ., CI„.L'''Ne.), ., >,' tt:i) UN {n r "~1''" .r 4r ` '� 004 �.�,-' ,s. a ✓j k r t �S,k1 r ,,,'%, r i 1 . '—�`gyp 1 �!'°.- il h y" ri ip Cry f�,.' l 1 f 1 r i ! , , : 1 I + y , 1,/., ' ), , , C ,.. „„ —, '. ' ' ''''' 14 9 e't ' ‘,..::),,e.z p op ifel -71--/15)Ai 6 Af Oiq coy 4,.1.:)' iik,/ , , SCALE. �, / APF ROV b BY; � � _ DFt,�1N�1 �. .��r ...., ` 4� j 1IsEi") y 0 1' ` Ill I ' S bFlt■tlldllVG 151U[JInFf L. a , 1 7 . • • • . +a..:,W,..w.r..w.. .......aa.ra r Y.. ...««a,.m.«., ..Y:.....,M,.......�.—,�,..o.a,.«. x..�.u.�rn.+.R.,...,..,.,S.. .+.. ,. ,.,...,..a,...x��-•--•uA�',aW.+'W�l,.. r..l....•»;.a.u.u.-..w A........-�w«..dH..Mr::+.+�J..1f+�»,.. .�..+....i:n,.iwawa, .4W4•.:rv"5Ar•6«ems.».idtl•1. -U..i+.-fi+1'S;.:.,.,:M.«n,.,:,:,da++w}�d.rvtr-.:M.Iw.>ni.+•r. wA+ W,rT ALIA.M A. MONAHAN i ATPO1t1EY AT LAW 12290 S.W.MAIN STREET TIGARD,ORTIIGOIN 07223 y MOM 930,8900 -, May 6, 1988. K Keith Lid.en. Senior Hier planner Department of Community Development City of Tigard, ' 13125 S.W. Ralf Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: Request of Puget Corporation of Oregon for Site , Development Review Approval and a Sensitive Lands Permit 7440 S.W. Bonita Road. . . Dear Keith: . Enclosed please find any. application and a chi skin the p amount of $551.50 submitted on behalf of Puget Corporation. As the narrative points out, the company seeks approval to expand the existing building by 20,000 square feete Time is of the essence to gain all necestary approvals as Puget is experiencing unprecedented, growth at this time. I have been authorized by Puget to represent the company to secure all necessary permits. Please list me as the prime contact for all questions related to this application. Enclosed along with the application forms and narrative are two copies of the site plan: The remaining eight needed for your review will arrive on Monday. x will also submit an enhanced landscaping plan to you on Monday.' P lease place e t1i s matter on the next available Hearings Officer agenda wk ich understand is June 8, 195$. Thank you for e your assistance in responding to my questions concerning g fhe • earlier approvals and the criteria that you will apply. Sincerely, - William A. Monahan • i _ .' ' -,_, f .....i...✓,M..wJa•r:... .._......A.In'...,. .„..ruA.....:,....h,4,..,,...„,A;...,.,.I..H�...a.,_,...a.ak.+.-w....._..,....a«......v...IL..._.,.,...._.,..rw.4..........d fAi,...,....lrS:..«.J...'. .H.aYV..J •.. . i .. • e • • • b"�. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Q,, * PORTLAr.O DISTRICT.CORPS OF IFNGINEE:RS •"14.:111)'- T1'f• Pr O.SOX 2946 t . • PORTLAND,OREGON 9l2Oe-2946 r 'a ^ i6'� • a Reply to, May 4, 1988 ;,�� . Attention of: , Planning Division (CENPP-PL-RP) eqbject 071-OYA•-4-005433 (Fanno Creek Proposed Bank. Protection) •: Mr. Geoff Levear Puget Corporation 7440 SW. Bonita Road II , Portland, OR 97223 Dear Mr. Levear: • This is in regard to your authorized agent#s (William A. Monahan, Attorney at.Law) April 27, 1988, written request for a determination if a Department of the Army permit is required for the placement of rock along the bankline of Fanno Creek. • Based on your Engineering drawing (marked Puget Corp, , Grading & • Drainage Plan, dated April 20, 1988) , it has been determined that the proposed fill would be shoreward of the ordinary high water line and • would not impact a wetland. Therefore, a permii. is not required. If you have any questions, please contact Ron Marg at the above address or telephone (503)1 221-6995 P Sincerely, I I a• I I • 0 1K. + an enship Chief, Permit Eval ion Section Copies Furnished I , 0SL w/enc .: illiam A. kionahart • • • I I { a I , 4.R (1,1 „l'efii j, 88°0 8 0 5 8( i, i Washington County , �' REAL ESTATE CONTRACT •di THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into this `t--nr+,day of : ; ., I, February, 1988, by, and between ROBIN K. DOBSON and ELIZABETH J. , DOBSON (hereinafter, referred to as "Seller") , and PUGET CORPORATION OF, OREGON, an Oregon corporation, (hereinafter n . referred to as °Purchaser") o a W I T N E S SE T H ,° In cone ideration of the stipulations herein contained ! g i and the payments to be made as hereinafter specified, Seller Lu �' hereby agrees to sell, and Purchaser hereby Lgrees to purchase, the real estate situate in the City of Tigard, County of, Washington, State of Oregon, more particularly described on E:xh ' pit A attached hereto (hereinafter referred to as the °Pro ert on th'e following terms s and t conditions: 1. Price a ndpament The purchase price o f the Property shall be $100, 000, payable as follows: (a) , $12 , 000, payable at closing; Monthly ' ont l ( � Y payments of interest on the unpaid, balance at the ra of per a • .. � to o�, �.O a 5 e .cent e annum p p n commencing on .,-' the first day of the first calendar month after the closing i r da. of each month . h t date and on the first day � hereafter; (d) $80) 000 on, or before five years following the closing date; , • (d), The balance, together with accrued interest, on r t,7�� s 0 or ten t� years �+Q�.�.CJw, tl� the ��cl` �. g closing date. 1 it te4L PPoPeOrY raAN. I ' 1 $ /60. 00 2,..12:-.1a. ' ' a ' ' ' ' ----"o-A-r—o ' bAirt, ) ,... f t9 . 40 t,2______,...,Itt , '3 r r d n i •I. • Al or ��any part of the urchase. purchase price beprepaid��at any time without penalty. 2 . Taxes and Assessments. Purchaser, agrees to pa imposed. . • - all taxes and assessments upon the Property after the , closing d promptly Q h t rrs�� tl when due. Seller shall pay the balance of the local improvement district assessment on the Property in , accordance with thp demands of the local improvement district; provided, however, the entire unpaid balance shall be paid prior to payment by Purchaser of the final payment due Seller ��, de �he r e �n r . . ' 3 . Possession. Purchaser shall be entitled to possession of the, Property as of the closing .date. Purchaser agrees to make no unlawful, offensive, or improper use of the Property, or any part thereof . Purchaser agrees to permit Seller or Seller's agents to enter into and upon the Property at any and all reasonable times for the purpose of inspecting the same. Purchaser shall maintain the improvements on the Property t in and order pa. shall maintain d re ar and s to n fir insurance With extended Coverage endorsement in an amounL� note less than the full insurable value of the improvements, with loss, if any, payable to Seller and Purchaser as their interests may appear. Purchaser agrees to provide Seller ten d , , ays notice prio., to any cancellation by Purchaser of any policy policies of insurance agrees exec e�.�:�er a such �o�.�.e or � g to execute any applications required. � an.. Consents or a �.�:oations� reg � by governmental g er authorities orities ha�ra�n_� nr�:sd�.ot'on in order top snit Purchaser t , - r i .._...J.....«.. .,.. « e.u..ytiF._.. .. ...w..r w.w4...-,.,...: Nl.w..r r--4«..A........a,1.µ.w...—...,i....i.4A.1.::_.-.m. t..n..,...,,.. uwu..,...... .✓-.ulw: •. expand its building r g �on adjacent land onto � a portion of the property. ' 4 Conve yIn e,, Seller agrees tha t, when Purchaser shall have paid the balance e'of the purchase price due hereunder and shall have in all other respects fully complied with all the terms and conditions of this contraction Purchaser 's par to be performed, Seller shall make, ' e��ecut e, and deliver to Purchaser a statutory special warranty deed conveying the Property in fee simple to Purchaser free, and clear of encumbrances` as of the date hereof, excepting encumbrances I listed on Exhibit B attached hereto and liens and encumbrances created by Purchaser or Purchaser' s assigns 5. Title Insurance. ragrees furnish Seller to Purchaser, at Seller' s expense, a purchaser' s form of title insurance policy in the amount of the purchase price within ten days after the date hereof Showing title to the Property in Seaa7,er and showing the Property to be free and clear of all encumbrances as of the date hereof, except the usual printed exieptions contained in title insurance policies, this contract, e ncumbrances listed on Exhibit H a ttached hereto, and s created by or through Purch er' � �� liens and enc��mbrance r �thro g �as 6. Liens and Encumbrances , Purchaser covenants and agre es t hat Purchaser will no t suf fer or permit the Prb e. rtyr any part eof,, become subject to Mechanic 's s or an Sher 'to tieCo� ..off any � or any lien having precedence to the rights :uf. Seller: is - _-.tlµ.. ...... . ... ..FtF..i..,,u ..H,.u...ut,.4n..k......:....,.,,«..•-..« «4.... .-..... ...a, +,y,, .♦ ...-...M • • 14 t L i y A � 7. perfr�r�►anc_ �: bar Seller. "' purchaser . . ....A shall produce and furnish to Seller evidence satisfactory to ' Seller of the payrn nt of all taxes, assessments and other sums of money which are required to be paid by Purchaser hereunder. ' Seller may, but shall not be obligated to make any payments for taxes, assessments, other sums of money 's='hich are required to be paid by Purchaser, or satisfaction of liens whi ,h Purchaser as er h as failed d to make, and all amounts ou nis p a i d by S elle r • shall be added t o t h e purchase price an d at once be ome due in with interest at the rate of 12 percent per annum from the date of exoertditure until paid 8 . Indemn i fication_.._. Pu rchaser agrees to indemnify • and hold harmless Seller against any and all loss, cost, or a , It ', ; damage arising out of PurchaSer ' s use or occupancy of the Property. In the e evey � that Seller is �a dea party to any action, suit, or other proceeding as a result of its interest in the Property, Purchaser agrees to pay all seller' s costs in con nection therewith, including, without limitation, reasonable sonable attorney fees . 9 . Default medies understood and agreed fault and ne s. It is l � between the parties that time is of the 65sence' of this p y � � .. �� and, hsse� shal�. t,��..1 to make,� the � a��ment, above called for Within five da ys after written notice of default, pr if Purc htser shall fail to keel!) any agreements . herein contaiied within 20 days after written notice of e ult Seller ma o- ion deol.3,:e the entire balance' r � � c.�ir� , �'r at its pti � A i cY 1 ;,N� remaining unpaid upon this contract due and payable and (a) - foreclose this contract by suit in equity, (b) institute an action or other proceeding for the collection of the balance of rice r (d) pursue any other remedy available at the purchase price, '� ( � A y law or in equity. Purchaser further agrees that the failure by r' Seller at any time to require performance by Purchaser of any provision hereof shall in no way affect Seller 's right. P I hereunder to enforce the same, nor shall any waiver by Seller r of be held waiver of �a. a.o �. hee of any breach, of any provision cI any succeeding breach of any such provision nor as a waiver of the provision itself . 10. The Closing,. The sale contemplated by this contract shall be closed in escrow at First American Title ILLsurance Company of Oregon. Each party shall pay one-half of the escrow fee. Closing shall take place oh a date designated by Purchaser, which shall be not later than 60 days following the .date hereof. \k,4 11. Attorneys. If either party institute's any ' suit or action to collect the amounts due hereunder or to ' enforce any covenant or agreement hereof, or to obtain any of the, remedies herein provided, the prevailing ' , + . xty shall be court may adjudge entitled to recover such sum of udge f money as the co rea sonable as attorney ley fees 1,n such suit or action, including . any appeal take, by either party in such sui �° t or action. 12 . Assignment. Purchaser shah: not transfer, sell, . I I or aid ign tree Property, or any Interest therein, without first • I I I � r r a I F . • . i, 1.J1 .-..w..... 1 n,..,.,lw.. ,Y-,..—'X}..,N a a.a,...l . .+«.,I,.lnw.,...y...+.+.+t .,..,1-Y,..+.d... ...,...• M • I n �tt obtaining, the written consent of. Seller. If there is any conveyance, transfer, sale exchange, or assignment l purchaser without the consent of Seller, them all principal amounts and interest still owing on this contract shall be , immediately due and payable upon such eve nt. Notwithstanding ' the foregoing, Seller agrees that consent to transfer will not . • be withheld in the case of a financially qualified buyer based I• - . upon a review of financial statements ��ancl, a credit report �to be ► submitted to Seller. 13 . Notices . Any and all notices hereunder shall be 4 . sufficient if furnished in writing and delivered either personally or by deposit in the United States mail as certifi !d m il with th the postage prepaid addressed' as follows : Seller: Robin K. & Elizabeth J. Dobson g/6 r`1.)11- 421)/S Purchaser: Puget Corporation of • Oregon 7440 S.W. Bonita Roar . Portland, Oregon 97224 14 . Parties . This contract shall bind and, inure to � �� , •• the benefit of the parties t hereto and respective �, r . t sUdces8orsi personal representatives, and assigns gns insofar as the a.mte7,:ests of the partie8 hereto ar0 assignable. The words "Seller" and "Pu rc h asex° and their accompanying verbs or .. pronouns, whenever used in this contract, shall apply equally 1: - � s or corporations ons persons,s f: :ms,� p� rat�, �� to ��all arson which may be o� become parties hereto. 15. Use. THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF .THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR " ". ' • ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed; this contract as of the date first hereinabove written. Seller: A wl 1 Rob' n. K, Dobson a Ei.1uabeth J. Oobsom Buyer: ,. PUGET CORPORATION OF OREGON 1 + 1 STATE OF OREGON ) SS a COUNTY OF/A''li.7°x'1,;i i// this � day �O� February, �.��Bo before " ' On ,.....�;; �►' �`, o s€� rotary publid in and tor Said County and state; personally appeared the within-flamed gO8IN K. DOBS( N and EIJZASET1 J. DOBSON, to me known to 'be the identical in y s described � � . .__ � _ i...,.� _..,�....,w..a....a.u..u, ,..,..w,I. n.ln ..l..n..n�-.„.1•»...� ,.�-i.w. .Ali.. w,A .a�A.� ..a Y'rvr..._... .. .».,...uu x..w....»»......ww.S.lr' ....1..-�...w-�..mS.......uxJ:.x•....a4rn:..:i'MSxI.� w f` •, ^ dint r In and who executed the foregoing instrument, and severally I I acknowledged to me that they executed the same freely and , . ' voluntarily for the uses an6 purposes therein stated. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and P f w affixed my official seal the date first hereinabove written. r ) i t. Notary Public for Oregon 'rl./LAN My commission expires : �r l,,' /' r7: 0 STATE OF OREGON ss COUNTY OE .,:zyjL/2 ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on February ,, , 1988, by ,!/4.7) of PUGF.IT CORPORATION OF OREGON, an Oregon corporatin, on behalf of the corporation. ; tt� • • J Notary Public of Oregon ' L 1 ►�" .a my co mtn i s s i o n expires ‘) r//—4‘' • ti �� J I; f {!♦fy ��fY�� hhY�G t V 0 �f 1 i '1 I I • . r YID 0 • .. 1 „.. .. .. w,, rz .-...�.,r....,•....a,.....,c «a. .:.)x.»-,..+kr.., art]r,.. 1 t' ' , ,. ,i H , ::: Hi : , H : ::: , ,,,,,,,„, ' : [ . • , . Ord Ito. 363552 , . EXHIBIT "A" ,tr ` A tract of land in 'Se'ction 12,. Township 2 South, Range 1 West of 3 . the Willamette Meridian, in ' the, City of Tigard, County of Wadhingt.:on and State of Oregon, .-m.ore particularly described AS T . �' follows ' , , ' o aeginning at the Northwest corner ' of Lot 20 , FANNC , CREEK ACRr TRACTS and running' thence ' East along the North line of the r Northeast corner of said Lot 20 to a point on the Westerly line . of the Oregon 'Electric ,Railroad: thence; t�orthe�r'ly along said. , rai: road 362. 5 :feet thence South 6.9°52'" West A distance of, 50 ' ' feet ; thence' South ' alon the East line o,'; County 'Road a 'distance f, , .., of 15 .3 feet; thence South 89 m 52 ' West 4.0.1 feet; to a ,point on , ,c . the West line, Of county- Road NO.. 1042, which point is North 0e03' . a,st 345'.95 feet and' lerth 69052' Rat 307.2 feet from the Northwest corneal of Lot:',.,20, '!,rANN0 CREEK pCItL TRtCTSi thence South 99i052 ' West: 367.2 feet; thence' South 0003 West a distance of , 345. 9 feet to the place „ of be inning, ' i � . , '' E CCE;'PTI'tJG •the' South 1.79 feet thereof conveyed to B.E. 'rorpen, et .. ux, by deed recorded M a, 1946, in l3ool 255', page, 751; and . S�C ' EXCEPS'IWC that �portioh lying +13ithin 'the ',boundaries of, roads . I • i I 1 1' n l''i . I 11 " ' ' /,,,, ,. . i r 1 i ,, ' r , r 1 ■ g • ti _ ' , • . . .t EXHIBIT B• b g. ( R . . City Liens, if any�, of the City of Tigard. Note: An inquiry has been directed to 'the •Cit Clerk and a 9 y ,.r subsequent advice will follow concerning the actual status of . • such liens . r 2.'' Statutory Power's and Assessments o, fJnified Sewerage Agency. - a 3. Rights of the public and of governmental bodies in land to that portion of the ,ramie es herein described lying below the high water .mark of Fenno Creek. 4. Any adverse claim based upon' the assertion that some portion of said land has been removed from or brought within the boundaries thereof by an avulsive movement of Fann'o Creek or has 'been formed y the process of accretion or reliction. 5. An easement created by instrument,,, including the terms and provisions thereof: r c . Recorded : May 16, 1w�7� in ®6?,� page 572 � � � • - i 'Favor rof : T,'Ke Unifier] Sewerage Agency .'of Washington County,' 1 a municipal corporation and r County service district of the State of,, Oregon . , 'car Sewer 1• !, Affects : The Westerly 30 feet . , . , , . , . , , , , „ . , , STATE OF OREGON 1 SS ,, ton County Of Washington I,Donald W,Mason,Director of Assessment and Taxation and Ex-Officio Recorder cent•Chat ' veyances for said county_, de hereby " Y ' . . ��' the within instrument of writing was redeived and recorded in book of records of said county' bonaId W, Mason, Director of , Assessment and Taxation', Ex- ` officio County Clerk , 1988 FEB 29 all II: 28 , , t /4)4/e/(.....' rCeedAl2,d//?<:, /2,7,!)-/e.. , -o ,' 1 1 id , 6/6,67- d494.P64/9-7-72.):44" 61:),/' Oi"e 6.e)/),/ ''', ,'' ' 1 1 ' '• - ' 73121(6) ''''''-"Ce,t) 4-Cdea-( 41e.t., Afr A/10 ' , I , ' „ , , , , , pi) 4' 71-- /19--n)J 6 iaL , . I , /, ) 1 , , . „ , , r i i 1 , __ ___________ . 1 .... 1 4 . r • iueM Na e,1 AI,i.ublirnl,tt No, L sIA lu LuiIINACI'be Vendu.auvor. .1kria..w.b.L.,f rr.u,ju$I ■1•■.,,,,rd111uM.I.J1.il.Jl, 1.1.741 9 ,n). , . r o� y ,p ASSIGNMENT OF CONTIIACT ' l I W , ; KNOW ALL MEN RV THESE PRESENTS, That the undersigned,for the consideration hereinafter'stated, ,, , ,\ I has sold'and assigned and hereby does grant,bargain,sell, assign and,set over unto ...'t3GErI'•CORPORA'LIO0„• ' 0 '..WASIhIN.GObt......:.....:i i... „ ,. i+.« .............his heirs, successors and Assigns,all of the vendee's right, title and interest in and in that certain contract for the Sale of real estate dated . I February-1.5 , 197.9..,,,, between Clarell,ce A. Carlson and Dolores V. Carlson, • with an w-divided one--half: internist, Wand Thelma V. �'roude, w�with an undivided dad • f. o xjzthaa:um one;,.haU, .n er,es, ...,+,4, .,+.$P�, .>~ 's and Clyde V. Jacobsen and Joan V. _ r Jacobsen, husband and wife■ as buyer,which contract is recorded in the Deed*Miscellaneous*Records of...W.40.111):14#011 County,Oregon, , -'^"" in book/reel/volume No „' at page thereof,or as document//ce//ile/instrument/micro 1 ' film No,..7.9.0,0.6.6.6.8:.,.(. ee),„(indicate whicii),(reference to said recorded contract hereby being expressly made), ' together with all of the right,title and interest of the Undersigned In and to the real estate described therein;the under- , signed Hereby expressly covenants With and warrants to'the assignee i;boYe named that the undersigned is the owner '' S of the vendee r s interest Tea l estate described in said contract'of s als'arid aha a/un'pa d balance of the purchase , price thereof is ri ot more than$7..Q.r..Q Q, . in terest'p and tleit J �!�a.+J,�y 989 further, upon compliance by said assignee with the terms of said contract, the undersigned directs that conveyance , of said real estate be made and delivered to the order of said ass;gnre, ' The true and actual consideration paid for this transfer; stated''in terms of dollars,''is $.,.5.5 c.,000+.,0,O,, e Li'JHowever,the actual consideration consists of or includes other property'or value given or promised which is 'et/�yotia° ' • consideration(indicate Tyhich).0 In construing this assignment iii is understood,that if the context so.requires; the singular shall be talon to , • mean and include the plural, the masculine shall include the feminine and the neuter and that generally all gram,, . 4 ; matical changes shall be made, assumed and implied to make the provisions hereof apply equally to one or more , 'i individuals,and/or corporations, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned assignor has hereunto set his hand; if'tile.undersigned is a i • corporation, it tires caused its corporate name to be signed and its corporate seal'to be affixed Hereunto by its ofli.. .•, cots duly outhorired thereunto by order of its board'of director .. y ,.,• ,∎ ' ' DATED:„,.. ,.,4,.f.r •... ,19,..,,8 4 •t G e:'.+.(1,`,• ;%,•:.sr'.:�'?G�,.Z.e..'dxe..: ...,.•,,,,.,+:,..,,,,.,, [ . . C v V. J,�e0 en ,#.. Jo' in 'V. 1rac7 seri ; HI allhltr t�porali feawl' pe,allenj , ., . , STATE OP OREGON, STATE OF 017EQON,County DI )Ss, Count 01 Mulltnomah ' sd, .,1...•.....,11....,.44.•,... 1,.,1941..44•.,.•w.,.. ' ! ((��//�r1/��y JJjj .H( Personally,•eppaarod ...:...........u.,.•.,.. , 4. > , :,...........w«.....,.,.and , • ..+.L.....P4e4 +..4 i „1•��rl.l..,.,.44...,.....,., 19.44. ,..... ... .44..1.,..r.44......,,..,.r,11..,,..44..4444,...44.,.....11.1,.,....44.44.44 ................................. , ty ail'ain, Personally appeared iho above naniad,...C`.+a..V. AO..,.V• aach for himsatl and not ono far the others did Is the s •..a.4K:,R.bAP«ll..•.Is io.a.G.tan,...v.r.....JAc'Q,> $.G',J•7.„1.r, ,.. ..,...,•..,...,.;:„.................proldan)nrld Mai life latter is the • ,,.,144 • t .i ....,..44,44u.44...., ,44..•.,,44.44•.,....4444.. „,./. ..44...1u,...l,...144.1..•,44...444444........................lccrary 01.4 , , 4 I........1•,.•,.,.44.....44.............../.,......,i.1.•+: 4... 44.,444.4,.+..........+ 44 .44 .....,,1.. ... .,. ,•u.........4...,....,...u...+,rd corporation, . . {-he .i^ of said corporaal ett dn btoduthdr/ns Unfa,batana st led aors/oand eaaheo- llt+lr u!aatd co •.. ,,,,. „.•.., rd of dtreot ' _µy volunidry act'arid'doarl, rpnr anted!n bo- ilorl Ui union!is Ma of and rraant to ba....,.+... lad the ldregoin tnetru- and Mat a seal i 1 t said tnalrunient iv �+ nd s dolrnowlbd� � d (era .. ....'+. 'o y y •dldri mot theta eckcnowledded Said inairunioni to be its doluntary act bud deed, � (ORFICIA�. , , i3tilorn Trio' • SEAL), �+1:: Grfn^ •............ ..441.1.„,.,...,,.,,.«....,......1,..1....1....1..,,...,,1., SEAL) I � t • Notary Public for dredan / ,Notary Public for Oregon IV y cot inilsston dXpid•iis: 5//�/8'6"''' My carrimiaaian axpirtis: . i , 'sitike whichever Word'nal appllknble,I,1iitc—The dintenta belwein the ipn,bali ci 11 no oppllkeulea ihelild be iiilalad,'Si..oE't 93,030,It Ole toiMAtl li.11,bIfiddy of . i rodeldt li ihauld Iii iiiatdid ilite Iy I8 Ifni pied 7ekerdi, I , 1 , I st Art Oh OREGON. •SU: �. • ale I riii i lhai llia Wil lien srfstru 1 5 of 1..» 41.......41444 444„1,1.444..14 , f Count .. r ANtoa u NAME Aupl A7ibatols , ,j' ' ' a. moll, kiss received 'for record on,the y . ,'. . ` . 11,v,.„ ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ..,.. ,.a.„, ..,. ... .,,•.,, ..., ....,, ..y they dl..30.1.....,,....., M 4.4•1,1!,,..4.11 .. . ...N....,...r,-.�..-.�..u..l,. a[.�,. i1.r.J.Ul Oi•oJU �d ck......r't�',1 rind recorded� .. . ... •, t..--,tC R NAME ANA AtJbnkGa 5pAL't nEIFI;e VEti , ,. ;chef fit,ktdinlf NA lar In book/ / r s documerii fce lily 4 Iv,j Pali d / /:' i licadnacri'e Urd6 pa de».r+,,.,..,44441u1,1d a i i ' irlsttln►enl microfim No. 1.,.14111 4,,,4110441, ......,....u,.,,...ae.,l.,+a. . 0 a. f. ..C., .,f..( n,«,.1.11 iiecord of Deeds di told,Cofirlt}11 i .'••+ Witness my hand, and seal of , fernrnli dti NAND a.2U+ Unll it khdlibi le iirivailid AU lea ilk! /Nell Iii iinl to IMi teflawinb bddtidd, Gourfty alllktad, .. n ; ra.c . r pas ,. f� i a 1 ,.11..NA1lic 1 , I „ , ,,�rs' 1iVt l r,J G,1014 , ,1..,1, ` ,r � l '6 ! °� fC �doW.. .. �1'e 60,44 '•'11, Py i 4�1ii1.I1.i11 a,/+1 1111 l,1/44111, 1/Qflly ,'' 'I NAht, t Ur TIN j d of d.4i.K.&.4 10"0 I r 7a p ' , � � � 1„„ • I .11.1..... ...... • . Consent to assignment of Vendees interest and modification of contract dated February'15, 1979, between Clarence A. Carlson and Dolores s V. •.' • Carlson, husband and wife with an undivided one-half interest, and ' Thelma V. Froude, with an undivided one-half interest, hereinafter ., • called the seller, and Clyde V. Jacobsen' and Joan V. Jacobsen, husband M . and wife, hereinafter called the buyer, concerning that property , commonly known as 14605 S,W. 74th'Avenue,, Tigard, Oregon. • In consideration of a principal payment of $10,000 and our approval of . the financial 'statement of Puget Corporation of Washington, we do' hereby agree to 'the following changes in the above mentioned, contract: 1 1 , 2 _LL ..Tne vendee...0a.11 .be Puget Corporation of Washington. I 6 2, the balance due on the contract shall be $60,000 payable at. $600 • per month, interest only at 12% per annum, all due and payable not later than February 28, 1990, ' 3. There shall be no subordination of sellers interest to a , , construction loan. fltract balance can be payed Off at any time without penalty. o ' . '''''''('' 4''dr "''' f2.,‘,... e ....•■•..** *4.,..4 . 0 t'. ..4.:La..*, ... .......C11..111 ..".'''"'''''. ' . k, ' t,./9 /4) , , ,:_i,e? 1 ../... .1 .4/4 ...t. / . _.2..."-,_... ., • A�cE�r�� Ar�t��. h •� V NDORS -"°' 1E5 , _r2_,3 .7-___FL4, ' /-,55--1? - ' ' 'I* , bATEii74,::: -- 'DATED: ACCEPTED AND AGREED: * Item #4 to be initialed by both Vendors - , a and Vendees at closing-,before .. PUGET CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON . 8Y► A - - i Dated: 2 . -: , i 1. . . a p' . ,.i::,. s1w,...Lr ..Iry.-.y..-+J..�.•a,..1.�., w,%.ISi.dw•..»�ww..sk,-+. rtil,..,.w.-......_...,-�.-..i✓ .-AI.,:L,..nCl„n.n�u,. s , . . . . , ADDENDUM TO EARNEST MONEY CONTRACT•fTACT / ra ' EXHIBfr NO, ` I.D,NO,r,L t, . r ,, r , IN REFERENCE TO THE FOREGOING AND ATTACHED EARNEST MONEY CONTRACT BETWEEN• . ' BUYER(S),AND'ClaY.'s.:noc A. i' 1.J1,1l1J.^oi•i, 'V. 1,.,,,•,:1i.•.1.1 ,.,.t'.) '.L'i1,51.s.lr., V. ..t.1 LS.1;:i., 4JilJ:....,.:F,' :..+1 d...,.:_-,. I 1 \ 0.1 1 a d)b!3 1. •, SELLER(S), DATED •,..:,U,:L,:."t �!,.i 1:�..�a .Fops THE REAL PROPERTY KNOWN AS -1,'?5 f"; ✓ °":.,. .L l':,b J .1• =c,tt,, s 4 r +, 'E'a»aJct.::k'iif' (:. i:ij:Jlsl� • , _ t r • .-,-**-- ,•.THE BELOW SIGNED BUYER(S)AND SELLER(S)HEREBY.AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING..j;,(a14 ,.,C;t::'' """'t '*).r: t. ' E ' • "• � y; laUi1�11a5'} U:•L•.% r i3 4�41:1i.i: C.•.. •,O l�if1,.,51 L1.f'd: ,w1`i�: i a'.Sila S�.�.1: (if: *o,4*:.:-.: J.,14:.011C.ii.i3 d:lw .4�:1 45 .1 �i GU� LcC with'. :>' S�: JJL. ' �.� U .: :•l: .: i L v ii� :: a ,1 1 J,,: , u l 1 ' : 10 t 1::.140 try C_,. ,1j� ;) 1'..4,1'..4,.....0,1. !1) S.:. .1rcwt,. t.d..: li .' ,; . :... ` .. or: U U,v 0•V. . I .. "• 4 . LaJ be iia,Nto �iit:11 ,7`.tt Leto st.: 1711 :∎.!1:1,.r4i;:(..i1�I:::, 4.41: .L.�.i .7tila: ►i1S11'kl1 1:1:.+7: i.i4:14it,.1.1loka «'C� r • I , , CO4 Oclu l i'al/J,1t1;i1'ta) Uust,7iAn a 011 4p.ro'1 ,�Dt j,�.I�Y,j �a'1ft 1 11, Li1i�•• .L:i'l� +:7.: :..w4vt: .•aJ1ilat,:i „. • ,. , ' .," �:�1L1 �il1s a:C�� LVa ,S:11,11 r1L. : 1�4 ... � �l�dl �4. � k : 11 • t"Je1il111111tee I I ____Li ittd t,,�i»:::3 to Lt,11.1t1'J:tti Lets:: Cs s cs itiJ11.6t:i.0u.)011 .I�1i.,4 'o?l:.i N.:o i.t..1 . • • . 'e„' , ,, , 1, ; a ,, .., K.'.l: 4t,.c.�4.r,t.al,x:;41�'t.':[,c:1.t1 .11/4),:;. I.. a) ,..ill: 'lull it 1...W�1�.1.%'l: , ;�`�.r�i ��1� .1,1 �':11�1.:i.��.4f:Ui4t t�lt� 13E.a.lrlait � 1.C�., . , y 5 11 1I}, 1 'C�s:i1t,_l,,,s5ft��,_,L�f.•, rf,1'�!, •G.:1.1•1,.: �.�.11{.'.I i�JLl 1:+ ,34L t•+ +ll,,..,ill�. . 4,.!'.lY, .4.J' i.l "` I , i C,j .1!`c j,911:C'C�'1i.1'a"..1�1:`.S a '.".,G .�st:» outlt.r...Jl�,'i:'s,'li1 L1.0Ei :EC.).'e,.11.12.7A i:1iJ1E,i:•,i!,:.,11 t.i1: L,il :i... :wJ.,:,,.�•11� . 1 • ^""--_— " i5:d'ipa tj1' i n,14 111;1x':1 �h1L13;cl1aLla7.!} i;;o.(uf ;.•.,, c, iil':i1.i:1.r1;' ;1 13,.1;.L x. : 'a" L .. ...�.�a,� , , ( • � ' ui r J C Jl i al1CL . r r .t 1,1. C. 1 . s' 1 . 1. .FY �° t' •i4e j i.� It�.4 avi 'o��b 4i4t u t�? .+U.wi,1 °�1r.l.,m•A..c..�,1., ,___., I ''' e ' (� I rs � +, /•. ' ...j t,1. r1 Y/„}r,-I./..1.1'.,'1� ' r i 1 r S 1. •�: rs.G I � 6.4E 1..� � f y 1 V 1 ( /7( S,e.44.. '.e G' ✓C' 4.../GIvY%,•l 'C.LL f.A.i1'S ' j' f'++1,'" !,1 I/r14,ef.t /t..„' ."L I✓r'I J+'F'✓' •',ii• (•!Y - '/i/ i„? 'fi t •/i+`�j 4 t"I'.•�./I_sV •'...;! (./( e, A ( t•t` ,.-✓'.11,i.1•,'.f'.l�( .i If - , . ;� I 1 ��//... •' ,, THIS AGREEMENT,WHEN SIGNED BY BOTH PARTIES,IS HEREBY MADE A PART OF THE FOREGOING EARNEST MONEY CONTRA 7. ' ' I DATE, r'i'u11t1�t l.�'1'� : .!),'1 i d._�,t�I DATE- ) •, / ■''.r,? o ■ ; w1.1j•L'_'�tiY5 tw,t r .‘), Co: Te,;:a r.�11�,:wir,'k;; F 1 t , 0� -_'° 1 1 , ��. BUYER ti, . r SELLER ',ALt itt:1t.;,.0k i:11Cs ,i,u‘i,!�1 O:; ,1,u»Y's.»(: '.,,a 1t�B / ,'.r ,, "' SELLER i` �+ 1 ----BUYS b • 1 1'1174,,.'1:/l+sblwl �.11•Nt11,1151u �O ii. '. ' I' 1 1",, `t'' '4 I'V �,•Yi.�:1+11:+MI` 1,1'4:,bb .1... aJ pp ' ' _._'� 1/ ''• REPRESENTATIVE DATE. „�..�,� T C; ' . � iMaltltot'bll feel i 66' 9..aeil .. ., , _,....... .. I t 1.... w., _., .� ,; , w,..,, . I. Ili . I ' 1 r � I I. r 1 a • I i r • I Y r y 1 ii2,'HF?, . ', 1 r f, 3 • ,• ,••' W �, , . I, ,ii-'i,',, 1 •SAGE,,AGREf~M NTt ANi,RECEIPT,.FOR EARNEST MUNL•Y �•i '1.4 i ,0,6", 1 , '1`+�r�r""r'•' ��.,rl'M:��11:"1.I' ' '% �Ir•`•':1 11�AL��R' •' dad Conic' i',Reo oei t 1141 11 11 tt i'<' > ''• ' .t' ,' 'i 'r •, , ,i:. ' 1;; " It lJ ti1,l'ly f,�illlilil•.'tIIV r li, ,y ;l h;l t {. it+t''r,,i ,,, ,.,'I+,d',,. 1•_j,' ,.' dyfIphl1971p197r fort,IR,ev 1/801?,11? 'r1II;P ,,1e I; ',i+"1 ( I I Il' •'t t„ ,',: '1 1• I' 1 , • '� d , " �),','tt 1.i a ^i''.� V '!i V""'t i t l '" �, l` f 1 .,..1 ,1.l.!' '' 11y'/,1!•.,:'�,. , ' �''' y i +! '' y 1;� ,J t ' n 1 ,' P',F,'� {-{�� I'«I�+' t'i''' �'•,;� 'r;''' .'h '1 •t f,11.r 1,1,;:"1,r , ' ��(' I f21,t`L )4 9 +,'11V,t'•f 1:7'1•11.,11 t� i N'41hw,l7�.a d/ ''',(''that, V f, , '.•IX',.i ''' �yp I'1 I li, r,'I:! t ' .•�i Ei'"J.�,rNt ,�JV ry f�l JX/F�r.'' 1,�It.y }I 1, rri 11�}.r i• It 11 I' f.JS� l.r'f,i t " 4tO.,14 11�al rfilr.10 },R;tr4r8see offerv,,. p;, ,e 4tie followingidescrIbedlirpgl).properly slluahni In 9hs City PI •.;!:"7:; 1.rT.r...r�•n you 111,9. A-a,.;} TA .� h,,,,1 t,i., > 1alo°ali'Q+i1. epo�Jiflay lfrr! t'" t' t,S:1,7Ri!© .."`Y�,� 5!4' �i dlC•.,! .!u {j 044.)..4.:.;,..,(,-,.4.4 ft:..�... • , yI Qi 1•I d W y nv , i i" ril+. .,iw.,., ,. y.., ,;'14',,' Z. n.;7...w.. , j , q +1.1l,„•.,4,14.;' �+tti' al r 1 �. r I.It" • i, 1 r i pi dascri Vogl ' , 1•l '' t'.1•x ! 1iy "`'t h ., ;;ii•Sa ,, 1� •ii•tk"nl ;1•r.irX:h.t{'t' 11,70„,i,:,ki , 'I,(;it 1:,. t+ h''.'' 'V11 ,. 'I• ( p 'r''J',r{ ti°f•,i r •t•,,.,. ,, ;y�,�•:-,7;,1.';.., 5',`',* , X11 ,Y X42 ,i. ,1; ,1 '"�. ` ' v yr, r ' ryr....r.,r....r«««.?-• 1,S. 1 «,;7'•S ,"••, 1 Iv +1 „r 7,- 1, -••1.' :,w«+-fN')7,' Mi4 r 1 r, 7`,": Il'1 r iTi •"» 1 7•'^•'",:'7'H'•Y771-' , 1 1•y �! ,5 ry,':t;;, "t ,.17Th/ •Nr1'I' TIiV;l ,h 1 ,f1, y '4C,,,i'i;1..,',,, :''1 , r-^:4 f t f.t«.. 1) "r ,1 r.. .,. ti' 'V"' l;,.l i,ql, r ti r�t 1�r• ,}t `� nl'u 1, .7. t`n,'j•r wr,1r •t •I'-1 N..,i r '•1.l�, 1•:t ti'!r `:'.'1/.S."�1 v",r•1..•.t;.. .�i'' '1,' ,' !,t� ,» i;r.r,,flfL��i�N,�l�l� i},f,S„lltio,n: a..:,.�f�t.i ltr,.. .1 !i r'. I 1 1' V'i'.t r,' 1•l,it � t ) fit'. Yv,a G';t {:.1•l,I,.1 "irC c•t. n rdr.,rw«,,-rw.,l,,1•,r r-:,�r«in.,.r.,,Jr7S,,.,«,nT,l;• , `.„.....u1.«„r«.�::.:.,,..r ,— r r fr,ilr.!•{•,h�,l'n.M.;' , t t.q•.7i•t,-.r..tit •,..,r,.yi:.:-1."r«..;««, r-t i!...l,t,I1'' 1l 1.1. 14.111'2 1•..'1'"'($', i' j. a 0,,,,«•.. I•.wl,ni,, 1: V I,-, f'. ,,r 1•,T 1«'•,, '.-, , n r yy��pp�!��'yy Y� �y p p x j5t ' :1 t, :,2'' • " «.,....,.•.. • I 1'Said ai`riio I kn rig t `047,1.Mkl:r,.�ifa, !„7..:41• : m7.Mt#:i„•reel. 'Q�'....Ej,Qr.ir,,• 1' 'r »1.•:...w r•,•,.r•,.•.•:r•«„•, i 7 t 1 1 1 e q f 1 f 1 .•. tit', t r. *!v i'T i5,i,,...1•«.i. .i' •.»..1..•;.f 7,« /t r�• /y r� ., .+ ; 't� t S:,-,I,1.l of,�,r l'�.)N+PI ,e`','`,,'r , t2•P ,,• ��I' ,�� .l1.., }(creel Odd1e111'iJ..,�l,.t ll;•41rt,1� i,,' ,t' ' GiJ OU VA1/t! rib r•w1f,,,yy 1'`�I' hi purtholi Ipfiei,�l�ir�it'i?..ti.i 1.l r I!f i+»i 1 11 ') 1•t 1. t i '2 1.,r + 1 -r i'(�r�ry��,'°e S/yy /r1 te'�►+,/•'.;r, •"•;'$.., r! ' \• a2f 't-, ',f '�; ,'•},'ia,.1.0 f,lti,?si•,!'•I'i.R'�f•t ,`,,"i w"r•:411),.,,,f';:',Vl,..l:l", , ,.1• r • r:,fi�'r.JoUa"j Q , ' ' 1 •i . 1 n Ih ia1(owf i a s of II Ed eel ref eciil led fot,ol"1 r.''•:'','; ;t t• •"r „ 't'7. i p P g ng'1 m r 1 1ti ji in P119"h� n,1. P e:'V t,t,' i ,,+' r .' }r --"*« !a n t f,a, • m YI t , s t i .'''''- ,' , 'c';1•:•yft. 1•}Y ,1.,'`i ,ti"':••Y''li`li.,y:l,.>r+',t;'.l,,a Y! I,' ° , 1'1 ,. "j r ••r ,, f.1 a•'f , 1-,I;, '',,? (1;1.4).•7 sunLja,,«.t:i,tthii;l:1.:,,.'r�f�„11...w+i'as:nddllionol.egr0asl;moneyl,fhe c�ntroh't"1'.1F'i�'i',i;t,i'a r.,••ad n S+ :.yl„9 �,..�....;«.f„,,/.••(,j” ,. ,S'!• ,, '-;: ,,).;1'.. , It ",, 1 ,,,,1.1 ,,1•',. ,i,,a "'•� ( SUL 'r• 'l, ,'+, Y "'•14'•� rtti � ,r"• i^''4•t`�•1i;tcli.,'�1 ', i 111• ter' �t 1.i , ,� .',t• �4 �, '�' tl•i Y,it,, I „'1 1. ,. "i ,; '.f, 'n ;1''.'' .'., I'”,%',r.+•1«t' i,'1• iI' !'.t' ' 9i.,• ti „»i r Ai or 6,741.).ctprlpp��7li:,ttolcn�a•gl,doWn aymen. ,',',,1.,t (,,,,'.,,,t...; 1,L 1'!,, 3 �- -1•r �., t 7 1•',i' / 't ' " DEED 'r ;1 I ,(upo.7 0`9'10'MYtl.:bUOI'Il o 6 P'Lk 1;'i,•'•' r' ">' '' .', t:' 1 41 t i 1 1 11 Pr,I:.rr.r'dt .I..; , . ��l;ii;V.,itiUpoq.ai sip{gneeof.Illlb�anddollVetygfe°�y�C01JTGACT,'I•heliu^1; ' t"t's.'r, ,,.• p .,,.'•,. •','• • 'Gi'f�M��'�+•-'-l't0 'i \ ■41,.1•44.•..,,:,,,—'. ,..„,'1c.� pcyablti ai',latfowei{Ii(;' al. oA'�1,:.,Ca,UTa...p x3j3 euat:;..to«t.K.F”.11• ..:ati.t(»rd�.1:a ..ieu:�I,«,oit..:�.i't5Y': .�.n4,:(«�Irrest,,wia:., ..'il;'ti „. r4 1:.11 dti p,ro 1 ."d.ir,•n,a. "•4,1 r ,.•'�3C:tat-,Cioatz .0%,....�ak l.1C`.r..•.to.„,ip. .0 ....1.16 «..�.a, 'I�„.3JX.Qaf:r"11.i nt,„,3,a,�..`I~ik.„...11012'i' :1.;' t; �?urci '+ a;",'.'Vat;i,!,:�ea�l •,'Hsu,'h1. „ncis,2,;::>a. ,,•..,' 1a,.. ti dou3taa.«,A, 'c 1•1' ..,r. «-t111.t.,�..c1.00izatiae.....r 13 ,1, 1',.1641,„''''"� :. .,ti'!«i. •'!1.'"i,t IIY� 1"i ' It , «1.l' ,A, • , ' ,..r,.»•,««...,..,,•r...««•.„«:r.«y«,1.».,....•'•.:.,..,,«•.w'i.-I A ( . ,br.ia, If Indeitletlnau Is'oetumed In Ihlirti psacflon"11n'addhlon t o „ ■';�rl:1�t r if N5W LOAN/IL'MEQUIMEDI TMANtACTION fUM14CC,TO PIJNCHASEN ANOprtp�/PEp YuOUALIrY1�G FOR THEILOAN,assumption carinttto•moki for tonal therefor no(later thorl 16, . • --' t 11.'`"g'"1,1, r,qt1•,«•:1$'4:,iy,i.tat•'t1..;i7,•NAtr..lr�•„7.rru(rt.40, w1s t a•,pivs 141.).1,•'••',comPiele necessary papers and,Nett bell'eliatslo'procure Such,financing:and If HoMadion Is to he iinanced,ti ye , .r•1r� ill lA 1a,'i a ,d"y•• 1,,7 1.1 I1. r , t r{ - 1 • ,, • . '�i^V'"�'l,t'through';F(16ro l cier61.1/at.oller apt'ps'I'd',p t'llie prepvolllt'g. ort imgs'dItcouunh.rsqulfleryd�by lender)nnool to stamped$..,rtr.•;'.,9.,:,,, i t�t:.rr•..,iyr��' • h ,I..', a':',) n•!ill 'f,i, : Id0's ° ,tie, .It1'' ill,•'{,171 1f,1'id �trr! /�,td4 or ,c+©.r, ��yy'.7.+Q .f+.4►a�ttlri�wS.• y}yy.Qlla '. a/�.�i LIGrNL�«i,,,.,� i.1 F6.l.t��,� w ,»r> t` ,t 'IQ'k?' 11i, [.U.t;'liy'„SPECIAL..CONDITIONSf if►i t Mta 1'J J1• 111 «• "'1•p'«'•nnyn,«,t irk.I ki,6c cad,!",.., 1 , ;:,;.agrAi+�t.cOti,:• 1.a,." cc.;11t iz s„,with..„tho....p. '.0.' .;,.kkc&id :a3 .,,, + d..I,t.a,„,elm 1•e, !;'."„ 20 a j .+ 1' ,,if rc'�tert.,,..t:,..Ptf c.c;kuza.oti. r,,. vr�s..,,r..;to 11it.:1...t1.a,,,i.n:'��,ppcxt,,..E)rozi4tt 1.r,,+,ivon.;,.lic.14:b.r,4ata�.�,o ;�1;t.::1 a►1121;,4; • `'l,ii i Con 1 r .c1•Lt:gol,aar: /,,,711) tovzil.,b .,•1•9,&�fitAl i • ' •' r;,;, �j ♦ � ««`,'. .,.w1..,1..,...,,.«.,....r««,.,,,..«".«r.«y1...,.,. 1,ti,."».,,r...'...•,N«.�.•«..«•'.•w•• ,•.Nry 22".r,, lie.i0'R P•fchaser acknowledges receipt ol1coples of olfca to Buyer,and of Saller'c'Iniulallon CarI1(Ir anon,tettauRig'ulea•inrmaldahyde loam,Insulailogl PbNlot acknovtledua Ihbt',ptoparty.20r.yi 1':'Cat.o!.,t'R,av rblel luolhafyrl to„lhle�relnuP4oytded,'tih prop aIy�It tol.6au,IFu yoyed by ilia IutorV Wattanlyndpad Ices.n,11 delat�ci�aU II.niaapd,irintgm6,-4;.t ekCNpt ra.i ln0 otdlnanteai Gailsting'ond ill',••I�.0, 14 1,il•).1•y.', t, ,,'••,',,n-'(I 111:•i '1',.'1.). •,l' kJ 1.4„ •• , , t • i •' t• , 9.'. ,1. I. t,,,,,� ' l' ., t:l}e.4.ti"ptiuse ttrisIrltiioo/nfii,tef,,ervia;Haittss�Ien�rf�ede,It!�o.1 paieEhisi„udlttry'trsieeenimla�AOf sesatt�d which.h1 1•l.U pnrnperly�,rror,.atea In 41116 it,,propillrifi lecaiod'rpnrl•ll.+'':w1�Y,•tµ1 •T1a. f, .A.t14,:,1•t:+'t6I/ • is . ,1!'1'Yih�[W�fa©�i1,r.,t..1G•AM.R.1•1.1l„s•ctinA+ 11:+.F.ai,rrl.�il vl:ll,KiMAr.rM.t,'. .�ari ,�M,�.,,rrwrn,r Yn:�,i•,�ir,.7. IM ,,.l.w•I,.1.,i..,,,•tat ni Mn,r•yt,4;.11121,,..i,,7y r ,„111.1.,.,7 r 27::�r1 '' r .. itoep,,,k,,,� ,r,flJ ,, ^„' ,i 5' t„', , .1 ,. i, .r' 't',i°ll '•,,l• 1141.1 •t. , :, , ”, r' ll .,t 1.I 1111.'.1. 1.t°`i 1•'1'., }i:, A,P 1 .•,'`1•f•, "�1 r, .�'r ,,,( it," �i ' 1.,..,•).w.,.,., .2n 1•9 t',1.yf., t ,.1.j.1•,w.w.u,.••d•.«••Irtr,»,IVs+«•+«1.r 1.:r••.,•,..«1•••y 1 w1...,.«,wy.y.1..,t..:,.....ww«w wyw.«1.1.,«w...,..,,«.r...w•....«,wy I,.w..,,«u„w"p,:w,«y..w«w«,1..l«.}.««',',..,11.• i,.wwuLuu' f,il' 1�1r� '1„c;Soilot' iIifJiiIlI•,.,to•+nutcilnlarla',711Ier.1pturonee'pollcy'Ir(rrho?grnnuld I the purd7aia prim Itamlq fllte In surana,eompony Iii log pood'ond'markdablr'llilr„filer,1•9 doting 29 . ,f;lii p o seller,upoqq,,quoit:Witt IIurntth to pyrdtater'q'preHminai like tenon ntade.by jot Inturanca company dtowlnp d o ccndtt''tn of Iha 1IIii.lo'llto property, 't, •' /'; c 00'1' ' • I;f�rIf,° ,i'..Ilrse laF:dose',tot.opproye,Iha#Iolo,;orlcanfal''lumldl;mo,Iseto ile).isle'wHlilp Illlfly days allot naitto conlnlnl g q Wflltan slutemenf of defocit Is dell tsd to hallo[,ar;.having Of•'.,t • 1.(d n,`'•'oppraved.thi sots,,+lulls Io tonturnmblo,tt.IItoreorpost.money hoieln racelpted loci:Ito he taluntfad,but aceeplante by purchaser al Iho refund door not candilulo a rwolvat oleo other 72.1( ti hi,�e'c A /tamedlei'dvyllahlb'.lo'hlmt.;bul,II'saller appfovei'llte tale old Mlle Is rtmrkold la an puteltnser lolls lo'camplele Ihe'puidmto of hetnln plauldnd the ebtnaef money'ins to ratelolbd 07¢. t1., •t •a,a•tat•and apy.addltlonat,,aotnast money paid,o1•,apteed'io ba paid dmo11 da(brlaliad to.odor at liquiddtod dotnagal and„fide cancan Ihareupop,).hut)he of np further hindlnp o feet, 'a4 i.•; t11�1l,titt,E1,7rit'being;tub,Inlaalion',b(the.wallet'liini'.pltrdlasni'mdy;lo't'I).the entheil).none and he Ilea of any lusiher abi1(0116ns under this agreement. • • • v/i rlw r•,.9!!All.buill,in appliances,'wall:io•Wall catpelhig„drapery.bad curtain,roils,'window and door•erraent, ►rotor door'.and windows,'litigation, plumbing venllIallnp,"f:oollnp•and 36.li' • lifv l+'I,.,tihobllnp',IIAIVtei and'e'gUlpmenr'ilndydlpg.iloker and oll•lank,lout.oxcluding dplached tlteptacr egUlpmenq,wotor healers,attached atomic light and bathroom(Ixlu,os,-lied hylby 07,,,1 . • • ,. ' a0';1 f tr+,11,�1luoretconl lamps;vegettbri'bllndt,vawtt,•pe,"attached linoleum,attached television Unlennaa,all planted thiubs1 plultlt•.and tidal and all ildlures'ala to I.ten upon the pramitet at,2n,i' 2, ,I"'•+l'' '1.1• ,1.j. .t ,:,, ea+"p��}y�.�,r,./� ,fC��y.� 1•.7 y �Ay� M1�•�,� �t,,�gT,,�•�r1 y1• �i •. 4�3}t l,patl Of,iha pttiperly,pl�tdi'Iatl en pll.y�lu•M 7 e tGa 141 VM 1.w�Ma ky ( l T.« J). .w•�,1 JrM e.1.!1JN►7ww,J(Lx.O 1•r i, ,n9 rf1«www«,w:..«„«••4:•t�'«w.ta•,.,r,irw..rill n9i 1.'t l'•i.I '". iii41It• 'i3•3l; .Thp,jfoilawln6�p,t hohiprolot/ty"1n�iili;pfesen1l•iondliloptlUgi itsroflfotwlie,'Intad hereinrlsJncluded In the purchase,price, ,t.,;•;...•1.,,,, r,,,1.s..2,,.,,w ,.j,«?,”.l„w,,.,t,:;.t.�1;,w.1.;.,,.:..,,,.,A01�i1; . ryk.e-iyl 1, s.,! .'�Vl lr'1'' 1.,l'' •u�1.1.1,1,"2 'i!l'. 11• 1.,r• .• ,t 1, ' ••••t wy i„!ir1.,•l1. `,).461.,1. " ,w�.•1i„w1,•Alt, - r,.1'•„C 1.'r, tIi ill:)I f•« 1.m r'it.11'1 ir'llt'1 i\i t N I,�'/ty«I; 'its gw,r1.17 r,1,i,111171.”rww«i',,tu•i•1,.,•.I,•ww.,,,.,,1,1.11•'tN.,,,w•I,.,,,�.y7,••1,,i1.•,ft,•,u1••,,w•,H,It++,7•tl.,i.rri„I,f•1`'it 1) r,,,«• ,,•r1tw�W, 1 t i.' .iIIJ r'`S,td1t1 .Cs 1tt'Sti(i,�, ',0 irt�' 1 Ih.,t ;,,,9,•�,,1 1.r .,1 L,,, '. ,,r,,.I1,, s ,,,, y'.1 ,�!�,{' , r',., t , l'�•t1 I ,4 ,'' f ,) 11, i1,:,,.-11.':11 r' ! 1 f 's '•' I'�� rid,. �, r 1, , ni1J,'i l,1•l'',`�tl•/'TII�h1.fOnpwIpp It lure ale p t woad,by,ullir«and.�f,n9i°i7a ln�n i0ldl,lip,,.•1.1,�.e(��j,t.Lq�',',INi•.ti.r:,Gi n'ry.f•...•,..,w.,i..,•,ww1r'«i,..il,i,i3,i..�wi,r,.i,wl,il,.w.1,.•I,/..w1•,•I,�.H1.t,'„ly.•,,,N.....,:r1,.,w•,.l'.« ��`•';, . d1I11 I a'+;Sell�:re rounNt iThalj the above dwelllnpp It Saanecied,lo �J A public rawer tyiii n,,CI p canpooh Or'teak!ahifr i that h0 knout!of ito.hwlitiai ilru'lural defilctti'titat alt 49 i t. "IU, "bloc,ricol.,1WHlnL;•headpp,l ioolingtiand.plVmblttn•yelemt,wih:be,In pbod•Wdiking older and Thal ttie'butaneo•al•i ieppropedy dncfudhip yard'WIII ha In substantially It,,ptetenl 11,a• p1 qqh lllppl of li p,flmirp rihoier'Is nllhid ioipost *1aii Ihohhgthot a 1naflce1.ol d'ny Ilihi.Id be at act dtbpoInil title pi perfYl ihni hs ilal nd,a tica frost).any povemmeplal agency 4P ^ t�i 1y rte y .a t 1 �, tItl 'aj cf onyivlblallpnro('IdWl1010sIrig tij"11lti1'plapoily.gf(aRI',, •)b•1a i2,.ws•,t,;.N' r?•I,,' ,p.w,1•„y„ t•I 'Iww'„'I1,q•,, „ ,', li'”.t w a:i riu i,i,y. i r1.rwwwwlr.:.l...ww w,t•.w1.•••• ;1'S t ii��t..1i✓`p"'i•1'141.1.,'1.•,I:''',11.4,1'r'li'"1ll'"' � (Ji r", � , . , 1' n'.Yr,"'I.1.' 1•�'';11,••ilt+, !" , 7 • (r'. ''r '`ii �, !4 ,. ; t'. .1 r 't1. i 1.r l!+iii'"..�HIl"i, `(" •i 4 y •�,1 ,t }'' ` I..,..::.««. 1.1y" < t,,tit•.,:.fy..yr, Iwlx• :A,t•1.1.,,,y.•y1.w y•w.«,.r.,V•,rw•,�,:,t,r.w•,1.1.«•t.!I.1„«.iFfj1.1.,i,.tw'�.}««ii•, ,'1...i•>,..i i•r,,,:,l,,h.r.. 1..1...tw..,l ::L"...rlw.,.,.,.,y«r,.w2...I•''� r O4.9:+11;, , Il drfTNEtsVeWILLUME aii'i 04.r1i1ESCkii ,Z7i;o(iescfoW'•snjaii', hoist; by,tallai'I'purdlciar+h•"fizt nq�'h•ougjt"Fi'efi:�•A dilti;,:g la.tl.caUi).hail'itn• ltured;'rtluoiiy 1n'r'r1 igl'1 �i ('f.."Ili r' 'l' t,') , .Y, ,5,', Y'pl i r 2 1 «". t , ■ . • (1,,,,,1'1i1",pAniween,taller.ondspu(chase r,+ll,ti,f,,nbt,irp4t,iali,legal,leoa far conledtf,ttreRalallan than hi•pnld by i{,,. IYA "g1•,Ce.,'�n1e., Q.l.±ri�,tZ"ri,l,s,rt,..lrxw!t t.-,.•yw.«w,it•,r "49 t' ,•'rif',jlr1.'^(�TraP%otll`Ipi�lfoi r n1 a liRi)rnjYlAl�aujr��1nae11y Iha.I eat ctitin ad oiler,:lgdllony fpturanc5 premlujnt.llllplltdto•rir,bicunlo4 ekistlnq Pallty)and olltsr'ptapald•axpenset;plhlbtttablf Id'lho"15�1•'f iAl�,�n`' 11T 1�,. ,�4' q,, , ' l i... .,hi, ,•••• .. , • ; • i ',y1,.'a oturbaiiiY�i1.01,ytg.ptpdo,akigi 4cileth)php,onlyl',f Oite,pyldtaier„Is entitled to possetlloht,Ort..�1.'„t.ddyi allot'delivery of ohope mentioned dead at tontractt,CJ On;w,+wt.,;,,,rr,;.,'t.««i'$2,tri , ,� pr ).41.1.4 ( i , •'' 1 1 i i +i'Sj4.11,19;1;PtcirSallar7la inipl+hUlt+ptalri(p'JIII iony.t nil,.trnpao`elpaurdartassessment t o).iii oti$hoiaonadtp Ircli a Itto pa.to et bdthoen t on bbldtnki ntingyhul itio auanndl lei or h Ue,5d 1•N 11•I+patch 1 and I ;,rlh tip 1.I i Pf. y. •P p Y N. 9 f N 1, r 9 p of P l ,) . 1•t•, .� , 1, r ,1��'1•q,ntiu.'dalpitorgpayniuntll°4rhill).'.rhot?<beott.dalgttodi;shall'be paid,h e,,,(t+j�,' 4:I3",i'•.: a 9 1 y.i•.CI r,..wb•«14.4..1 '':.«:i,.,.i,.•,:,,.i,•', •,« %IU'w,;..i' ,:.wt«t•1.1,ri'•,'.:h•1.ilPurchaler/Soffit Indltatawhtihl $$f 1 "dry �, �}�1 {tlal,li”.,!::44.1 t,TI{4 ,(f'Qf�9110 isseNCe•oe.i11111AOMEEfdENTI Ttansucfiolt,ta besni ii 0 r.befor6 y.,..'i7 .- .,..trt!dr, ,f,1. 'y 119.$.4•,or'as,bon Ihetuaher al(Indndn0 doaumenti 57.'" ' • •,. urro;i .4.ton be plopaled ond•markernbfe Ittle clangored, • ', �t' ,, , s i i• t ii�;yyrfii�t,i 1•,t,Srllar Ib,tamore olilpnitonal property hot told io''purchatet and deliver paif6rtlah to puic).ia+et)thick one arllyh Ii:•w'•"•.Iwr�k�Qt.•„'•'tidy).aft r•rneotdhld of abuye1.m'.niodid deed 5d lj'f'YiS'!'i,rd'�11q'4 pdFdilbuttetnant'o”ililtdi to'tellaq'�(•,I, '"I..ti1.I•••,.,. i:. :.L:,,.n..•,1...r• ,,.,,,.:,:..1...r 19«,•,'.,f di bi'tbdd'ib foaflnr at or*Hllnb lawn old/reUutdl!cgqs',Ail.19 ,' TM rr..ai-h',ponnit tNmovai of lendnte,all-ahy,Pollution thdlf bo daammd dillvated khbtt"h1lnr n Votafad Ilto property pod d,Uv9fed kayi theto(ai in t:Uitltrtor or 1119 undirtlgtled Rhbltbr,, 60 ,.:(l'i'd J,,•,,,:Better Its'keep the properly'nsufed IChetk one pnlyf,f,CJ Until pastesslon Is dilly/tad to puldlosgt at ttcording df ohoya•tnettllaltdd deed or conked,•,,ftIchevor.linl accurtr at 0 paid 61 ` � • ,r 11,y r, pulchdtar It rht tl,id`IO atieitlo-.'Insurance nyvIII Ito iacuta4 by atchdti Ill � t ..j„«w,ywuu '•t .,u,.•1.w.«7.•w,■•••,y�•w••$Jwl.««,. 62 I'tlltr,,lL pgl»ills TILE'PRt vt,SIONS PRINTED oa4'NIE REVE.SE SIDE IfEREOF WHICH Ake cifFEDERAL Eckth hE[aWq.Ake,INCLUDED IN THIS"AGREEMENT(' .. ,� i1,fi{I,,'g o".lf'i!1%il n1 t'AS 151..0141.LAND SALES CR 1RACE P9OVI$tON511 I'',+, u,FHA APPRAISAP VALUE Clp CLAUSE CL^.USEt,I t',■I ,,[a ctosfNO-'-Po5SESSIG'N IFNfAt CLAU5E1 ' ,Ibt',1 i +t v' to,I0t,y;I�,CGND(TION OF WELL cLAUtt • :i. t •r•r.:„.".,.;',..•_ clty'(NsrEc110N AUitfORIZATION ', r • t••Ung Ne(Ib tie$ "w..,,,•ai')iii aI dh ' f p r r . "6b"', �t ils,t°;ptItE.fa.e tI.r iprhas.int flpldit upon ilia o roornitltloraill 1•f.pti9i ffUuieldat ai doll wllhoufuwilliirl ban snlloftcaliat lfeP tli , u thutir will tort d pntileti"' pp. die:bl:' P, t 1 l 6e 4 F;'1,1,,..(j,I i•,r5a Sqr,and,putt(Dior InftMUli Ifte,(ittdertignaU honor,Io handle the eoinell money as fallowit:,a etdht Iii Radllor:t cllinl'c Item actounh f]liporiisiflgt's oicepitinti o1 oHGr,dopotll,69.',, 1 1.I} Tw it• 1,.♦ 1 ,,,.ti • I' I t' , 1.,• , .• ' . 1••y`,g.«iy+«Wllh t�'. ,.ryxfsirt:lt,t411,(:i'1;';r'ii,,L1,:1,`t:f"'r.i.ti,....1.=.1'�;1.•«,i"' as,WcraW'((EE,tEGE0W bEPOSIt'elAUSE ON HOMO 1AHIc1I If INGLUbEb Hint M•hiAsiT,0E',HIS AEA EEMEHiI, 70 r' �,`'IE n"MtALiOM dffAI.LwiIAVE'Ni1`FUIiff LIABILITY WITH AESPECI t0"Tf4 EARNEST MONEY UPON DEPOSIT WITH THE ESCROW bE51OWATEt)A60VE,lhfip ,foist Agi.itninI Nnitiaff•' r.. yl;i; g, ` '01'401'1*l'^''' '''U d.INu^..J Ile�liot'nckntl tedtde,•resel�t of aoino0J'Itia(l y tnihttIi if aftnt noteii if, tndle'as,ptovlded aGpval.horn puic aior Ill ilia tUm.g1$•w.2 000 '•).danced by„i$,'#,t . , i,•1••I ii^,1•tr,ll, 1•t',,111.1 $,,,1 ,V t •. 1,.1'7 1''i• 1”�J - 1C'','l .( 16. .I- 1,. x 1. V t 1111. 1L..�'1't ' ''y1 1�r.' i,J3 t,t^,gr►I1�y', '',,r 0•f, 'a,11.4....11 1 r,ilia f.11tlfae'l�'lei;r,i ..,,+'ti'2t, .,H.' „1'..:',.,wt.:l.,nw':..2t, , 1 „.1,;..;:,t ty'i,w.jl}«.,.,!,,.i.i:,f!LT pf6tl flinty 1 'a VI Ion rµ114w1).1,« 4T> .+.4+.Ni2"'�5.r. U , T,,,/Aft ft. .,,,•I Qt1�CIC11G.4 " " ►,r I }It i Rioffnr 7'i' 1'Ii'"'titLF 8 41h'1,;,,-"'•.,c1•,il, ,ri,,,;.,53:}�1�.,,,' , .�..,,,.,q. ,f..;%.'.;2 il�laf`:a k1•a err�t�:9:a « ? '�a' 'a t OX„.,.r:Y ,yew.,««;i Idtf,t t,q�,titoiiil1;Phones;1.414,,:,ll"i,iitpr.... �,/tan,,'.4.Mnlq•t011leo.Phona':•, ,1.,i j,mty°�,'�,, ,1i,::.:«»,,liby 'u,•.} „f,1•r 1% !;!•thG,p:'r A:. ,. g1• .'ki.t'.9'..«t,. ,.+�i:.t'•.,i ii`Y5.•6 7 i`",.. r =";�r1+" a.», � Age •'■ t�r11t'a'„11jMdttt dlfti:e'Addtnti.j1;:'�,ifj ,.ht"y., ,iit,..�h f'j.L f y L., t lY,.!n"'� �}�.'” w1.,......• A',1. ! 1.i.. «;1.w,.......... ............ 7 • k,"•.f'1,:.°a.. /' ,I'f.'.'''.:''.'''..I,:, 't.::,•., ' '1 +"'' ,.,,1..1 '•+i.1 ..i tijfiV Ac NbWlttiGts ffECEtat b.•,A«coMPLEi ELT`/?,1 I, ,,Ilyr 1 1.i c11ASEk (Pifriil°'r 1.44.•1..,.r 1•...,t : 1 1� 11 an• t'tlt$,:llllyf;TltEb IN caPY 1161).otilficj�UiiflAIa;i'IAs`Fiiii:Y'aEAO AND"�l1NOCMSTIilIDS gi'f0 ACKN171NLEbt]ES11fAT•HE''HAS�fJOT MECEIVFb 01!RtLIED UPON ANY 3TATEMENff MAUEt7 ,,'' ' I1J,�;t u bY.sel,LEPI OA ANY.MEAL,ES1ATE AGENT Wt11CIf APE NOT IlEtt1N'ERPRESSEb,GEED 0k tfNTRACi'f0 BE PRkpAAEG IN.THE NAME Or jayi4� b... rt'�t 7.,{...w j,w..,,: '«,,;7911•' • ' fItni'p l;',a.41',•ii=C.Y.2"i4t.ILwbe,itd;4;..„,l.t,..,.1,.,:« , Iw;.,y:.,• i,Thia olfor).half auibinalltahV eaptta„tty�'o',dgyi dtlei ilme of putchatbr't iidtIdlui.,II 1201 nkcaptnd'w.0106 hot Hine. 110,x, iq�x,C Addr6ai �.� Va3.).1 4C�•»t 1•$R; 1 1fi+6rt,y ,..w„".p,,.sw,+, I i,w.IG.,. bale f1z:x111�aJ�.1t�:,i,�, �. «fir,iq,iJ4`. ��.Q ,1d 1 111...4,ttl.r 1.,M, d11«., °'��,•;<, 1.i}}�t,.. M44./, , i,w.�., 400�Iy p ,i'f .. •,i, '• t�•'•it i' t,. ..r,; �,• : �' {...t l„ il,f�'r';,4,..4....1,,',ntra�4w 'P!`'11•trj4M, ,,i ,.1�'.1„,r•,,;.4Ntt.,1y«.,rwiy.w17.., fp V4 4�,'trVw,,.I uw Iw 1'• «ifrvw•d'i'(•! ......4�....yyt",.t.ry+�•,rr.....N y.w,ww,1,.w.w•«www«.,«..«1.i �Uftlldlet i•n7.;4 1,9 i oaatwi4 4.4 ,. rich).li Ihb:l Ia!1'DUbl4ddi a� tlii �l�f '�',611 dchid YFUh ee ii iV,••, I «• M.N*..)1•'••i •''Y.fi F]c; ,Y[A'•, ,• �, ("1� 1”, ,PUithaiel 001 .1•�'r}t,','�' $-15eller hei,,by,dteiift thi,Inrendlrtj Oat,. A1111E1..10 PAY Not MOAEdf1AN I',,i.i7•ww,7>.,,..ww,,,,POP IIErAfai Ip MMQUIMED FOI:i 1`1,4,t INAiJClf4G.1.51I11eI apt” n5 1, f Itnlifrr r f' i�`t 1•:1`, ornic te'oIlul,i OP,';I1 iliii t'd swap fiidniUttldh'Ihi IhUht1 6064 11te'tutif.ai:.,.1.w•,..•,„w.1.«Iat tit,vftat tohdited In Otis IrgtrfatrIdit.Geller hereby areby plbnit Suitt kebltdter'Hil 0 hiokit d�A6”, 1 t Tglgitllu{rr{ltiri a'n the Pt4ceesil!paf iiite lbriitUti Payment of F Id tuin'51111'dull brltet Rid 1U6 t IV A(t',broker l b oldie Hlo tbbfintf and 1•II.Intalcincb at Sd ler l 6b ail a and further irt lie ddiatI Ny Ina h Ina •1 lj�t;L:'tohle b1•$ffl8dtt ohYbi U fatb dItiilnp.PffikLtn fftPfPY A gNOWLtDOfSlhEhctlhs OFF AlhfohiPLLftiLY Pflllb INICOhY of 171111*AoktemeH (WHICH hhaLt tiA1 FULLY heAbpAND ULNA, 89 t.'4 I ,.4°'StAt4 Ili Ili Ili$ivbhf U,ltd*br'faift to apt file'Ilia Ins!ai,hiiiln mondial,Idlfilted bdtnit money atoll be dlitiibutbd di lolldwi bilk, edudlbh a a y flfle Ihiutdiici add billow 74 .4 1 p f, 1 e w111t 9 pp ++ p d '1• tad hi n coafu mni d .�1 1 t��ftancalld�iIntl�chgrgiil 'ld'Ribllbr,gttr II•�Iltls I/p colon Iruhiedlanl'to life,Ilillnt)Iltokatl In Ihb adenl of fhfe d(liidd coldmlitlbh,IULI db I1.chi theist tlldl I M m t ,�tii�q.nli fdubiito?iflb °E;,l'.41 i ,41''rl ,f +{i;yn' . , i„".• ,_,,••. 97 a', ,I,R1•, gi ,,�• i,•�tl"VII/r lit,ti•:1" °...t!,'M.jtl„1•'i rrit.«".ri.'i'i'r•,•vii ••.'•r.w.,,w...••.,,•,•,...:-..•'.•.x.w...!1,,w••nr. «u.,.,:t,o,i,,ww,.,,,n.w,r•.�,,•.,,.,,.,,,y.,,w,,..ww•„w., i'r.n«w.,:*.«.w'.,,.,...,,r.r, `, iTr 114'1! F lrrf 1l'1� 1 , �i.,, 1.I y4'j,. r;{+, k . ,4 it 1 f I. 4•u• 1 ! t r, ' r 0 1,1',�. M,,SCidtyu rills+1:1ii'114' ri•it,l tl'111∎46t4' 441'.d r 11!,y'r.•i.2•«Ipi.i.,1.4i"1.l,..y.lytfio 1111'y,•twat'iil !w, bole,!.f,,.•.,' al;.17H:.t1),... .w•w.41.4«).7«•f,ji',,.•Ijw,Ll b.wt,!�V.1.I..,,,,,; «,A.M.1+M'iy'11•r":`.P,1+t,'1•� cc rr , ',i,1',!;., y / �• 1.,,y',, r !r".1.,w.. 3illlt q,` �i111lr"i'd ,IVI i N,1 f1.,.to ,, ''I 1 I•t.'w.',",t '.ii ".lwnf:,•w.,t,'wy' 't,1•.,''.,.1.w IJi ':y' .Y'""', i'1•, 1,f .. .'r 1.«1,11.' 'E '1.w,..'•., ;' It Mf'!r Y 1 n ttJ•,1.(«n''I a V('t ulr 4'(''11.4',.41,..!, 9).1".91'""'-%":,i.l,tiifi h f•'Itch, 1s' 't` .t' yCt" L.�" wp,r.« f' 'f 11'P •1 '+ ! . i .�`• 1• . . 1 • t1i ' 1 1.. t,. ' .1. ,•, ii,aG' ,1 j4�at'4,.Pifbnbi`M$r1.t:!r T...........................'lilt'Y Met ul�.:.w,il. •.,i:•...:rt,ltt�;;:,,.,',..,4,E.,..,„„,:.,„4..,.' ;;.:C...,, ... .«,u„......:i,:d,.ri•»•t'i,1.il.,t...a.r,L+,R+Mnn"i!u.,.w«.•,«.,.•,.,,1'.iifir bs''• ' • a 1i14"�;'L;,f'5 ."17111, N,I+�,•' 'rift, q..y}1.� ;, 4.0„,..ta.:.l,I ,,•1 .•l"t'�ti�nw•"�'t'gi•11,;,A,Ms;I.Iw"f;; d:y,.G,«,w„,,ii.mi uttf(dltrr'atflrnlf the fbi6gohn( bptiunma61 dhd bikhowtbdpil to tiilpf 96 r, ■• 1yrti al a toI f thi'•dittIGhed.bl;r$ 1"eft ,,1',ti:i. I "i"it,1 Ai e 1'e' ' " 9 1.I i 00.4 7 f iilfiJ , ,j t t„ , "1„ 1 1.i t t 1..s'.r 4",,. f"� ,• l L1G1{1.'I t'.iG C1•t I+i 11,s It �(1ff"i 1',i t i w!•..Rw•.w1... •i.................................................... ',.w..,.,.......«,w,r,,..uw.t 'Uttftbfat-w,.,.11„uw . +d. ,1' ,wa,i.w..,w.; d1.A•iw,...••, ..««,�,.dw,..,ww•ww...7wd..,.t,PUtEhilf5�'9,k1",,. "t Ifs i' 1'talofr IlbhtircIGA bilw4Ehtdba44 h6Mfd Rlulf¢1 aiR.1'q.iris.....1.,ii,w+4.4.w.1. 44.,www.i.0.'64.h,.w i«ww1.„« ,w n•.1.ww:.,'..+1,,.Iw,•w,i1.,u'w:,.,oft bail, .,ti,.M ig.I.•..... 0....i1„Intl '” d „,;.+{f,'0,01411,it lf'r:ALI`'ali011 •403147NAt , wino l Bieber Soillag ainffot 2f 0f t 1i a j1•" ', ''} y i41PEiElJT AtiVItR, �lokir`i lylllfula,.wjp•,wr>,y.a,,.,.,««,Jwy hrff 11Gt U11GEAftoO01'fIIEI;cii '. . 1 r t 1 i ' • • ' ..... ..,.. . - ,..,..- :,,' 4....444.4..44.4 ,.�.�� .,....r.. , , , WA 111N lD ('1V _ kaJLfl' I i vc-ts.w.v - MAP . • SCALE - �lI" �� • SEE �' - t e 2S 1 12AB 0 o • en' � a (CRC. 736-40`W1DE) o I) . . ` 250 t In T 41- 5. 1. �* 283b� c {��{{�� ,a` -- 300 200• 600 _ z84 AC* � # \ QO-A% - 300��t a V'N No _ I r co L 117.6 of n 3 I 190.13'- — 1 424.!fs. 381:40_ --\ zo N 89°5e E -toot -- -, '40 °2_,---700 =g \---- ""4-9, X ,9C AC ' 1 ` . S S9° 52'' 00-CrA(°� 3st.°2c` o 42701 o V' 800 \ - 1.67 AC. r ' 4.L.- ' • \\?5,,is \ \ \ \-4-; , . . ..F` 15 its '`-',"'r--._ p 5 \ _ 900 - - p, 1 '_ 1 140` %98 AC.._ 8_ t r 00 \.,,,o .43 AC. - ,~ _ _ 5W' , - ...,•% ?i%1/////-', 1047 ,._. 141.21 171.21` 1 /__ _. ion_-..� i v.2.�e 3w3 2300� 1100 S 89'� c 230 /26 AC 2.15 AC_ , 5,3 AG: r,a.,\,_-- ��-- - - - 20 .- ., • �` •--- - - - - - - -- - - - - ,..,iii ..t/i"./1//i--- " - _. - _ 104 • - ..._ • liisr/!I! //! !, ...7Z4'0'� 7r/.i/l!/ I i..' •1'+�1.2Zi 104. • - .;� 24 30 !' 494. �9 f31��08` ` S 89� „ t 1�� C 2300 1.26 1200 1 /.2 AC. v' 2.15 A tis. — .m ii.)..),\., o N ' :7". , M \\...._r." 21 _ t ii z \ �t 496_?. `.._ \ 1 23....74 233.25` ., . OQ ... s �- 3Z0 i. •• 1 -,,p._ ••••\ to L :�7 sac.- 2100 �: _ _ - _ _ 264.34'- CREEK r. 303.51' 400 t, J OAS. 1 2.00 9 o s 1 w .8//,-_ - N ' . a 183-A✓ ru iy - _--- - _ -_- _ N: z t.A IT ° _ 4 I i LS .t .13002. 5'10.20` 316.20` r _ \.. A c _rq • 84.QCs w i 73 - .00° .6*------ SOUTH LINE JAMES H. HICKLIN ©i_C.4- -----,,,,.. 316.82' z 't 1700 s /7 AG • gt - � � 2 5'kb-tA\ - � "1 365. " SE MAP 523.38' 60' 30' 2S t 120B a r.F - -._. _ - - __ -- - - --_ - - - _ - - - _ -. - - - • x • ■ - _...,,r....,,r.,, .. ..-.w... ..u . .......... ,...s .0 n.....a...:,rlw.... ..,.,....»e,..v.wsx..,..,.y-,..r,.h...r.r,...,.,...r..l,..ar...r.,r,m. x....0.w...,..,w.a».u.a.,.,VI R.,w.wa+.d Wr..,y4....ar.:ti✓<....«Ytf=ctrW+F,rK Aa.n.w„a,.a s&um,r,h- .. ' 1 , , ::: g ivo.P.,,,,,,,w,lk;;MAit i Sabre , cton CITY OF TIGARD PJkVN{NC DEPT. �� f i Mr. Byron K. Blankenship Chief, Permit Evaluation Section , 1 , . Portland District Corps of Engineers f, P.O. Box 2946 1 r I Portland, OR 97206-2946 Re: Addled Paving 1 Dear Mr. Blankenship: • Please find enclosed , a copy of tne Grading and Drainage Plan f'. for Puget Corporation, dated 6/21/88 with ,a flagged field i w modification., ti This change to the original plan was recommended 'for ''approval' by the City of Tigard, October 3 , 1988 . They requested that a revised plan be sent to you. `�, . . If you have any comments , the City has asked that we provide them a copy of same . , e el S�.nc r Y • SABRE COINSTRUCTION COMPANY r i Russ McElroy .. I Project Manager RMCE/c , oc: City of Tigard I,. • ,, C, p, 7235 S.W. Bonita Rd,P.U.B. 231026, Port and,O R 97223 (503) b39-5151. j . • .a- Yf n n .x •�., ' "':r\irli in 4i( .' :.H' DIVISION OF STATE LAND `"S J ' , - ,, f' Waterway Project Permit Review ,►., "� ,r. - z w ry-, , Divl8�on of State Lands 4,00--% I� ��I : ; Julie 3 1988 r' ,,, Date:. e� �'� a'� ,, ;'�,, Phone:378.3055 .. -- FP 4859 Corps Public Notice No,, 071-0Y�-4-O0?829 '` State Permit No.. �.� �, Jim Turner 221-6995 DAL Coordinator Bi 11 Parks 378::31(15.. Ct rps Coordinator . I I Applicant: ;lohri S. Knez, S>; . ( Please return comments to the Division of State Lands by: July 21 1988 .` Application involves: 0 8trecture Fill 0 Removal L Riprap • r. ��a 0 Coastal Zone 0 Willamette Greenway 0 LWRiVMP CJ Scenic Waterway . .• State �pp 11 cati �n wa s previously io usl y ci r cu 7 ated Notice of Permit Application The attached proposal has been received for work within the waters of the State of Oregon,If you wish to make written comment on the , '•. proposed project,please use this form or attach comments and return it to us.This form is a self-addressed mailer for your convenience. . , . ' Please fold and affix the,proper postage.A public hearing may be requested within 25 days from the date of this notice,If a public hearing is . requested,the director of the Division of State Lands will decide whether a public hearing will be held based or,the merits of the request and : the level of public interest. . . THIS NOTICE IS NOT A PERMIT . i have reviewed the attached information and offer the following comments: VA. --)5.lT IV -,t , 9.1.'251,_ permit is required by this agency. 0 We do not believe the project would have an adverse effect. be acceptable. h ro`ect although rnoastara 1e would ofte , ❑ We believe the effects P 1 � g , s• :. 0 We believe the project would be acceptable if methods if construction or design were altered as ., listed below. i, . , � �I alternatives,� ,, ,' : We would attend a conference with the applicant to seek project alte a�t s L0 The project is unacceptable,as proposed,(Please explain below.) „' 0 We have no comment. , Comments; a "4,-i e..A PI Lion art16-17 `-i 1c. z;:;;; -ro kgRittio6t5 , n6 dr -rte o . IT 6i-c,e40)' ,,,, , ' 0 ir'' t A 1 l By: ' / 'Agency:y: - ht / w.: Sate: '• 4i'-01-1ooffe . 66) I • " i • 4 ,, .• IIIIIIIKIIIBWIIIIIIINEBRIUIIIIIIINIIIIILIVIIIIIIVNJIELIIEIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEIIIIIIIIIEIIWIIIIIMIIIEIIIIIIINIIIIIIOIIIIIIL, II • { � . P '+� e ez77 I f J l e e s .. ) e) lit, i■ ;S e.�^ r�4..4 4, /"'F20.. �Fb"�^'""`7 �r'�"w®w-r 'r+"'�a.+ .iCAG`Leo4+•' a� wl"e r<e.�+.'"e'""C•ptil--,d i, .4'�l k4 % fI, r • 3�' /� r J � a —& ..e4,.....i.a („0„,........7', .,0040' i • ° 1 "� ' I /� { ' • r, r � I' I i I' . GGda o', • . C.V.,'M.-1 4g a eit'llA 7 1-?'.% area :4000 ti I � I ' , I r' I a l I I i n 1 III I "� X is rP. ■ .. 1 . • ".' ' - -- ---- II IN la_na 'it ''. Pubil; - NiiIlEice ... oUf S me eCo s A... pp ,..., ti on . , Portland District• El .. , " Regulatory and Resource Branch • . i ", r Permit _ P.O. Box 2946 Portland, Oregon 97208-2946 0 .. PUBLIC NOTICE DATE June 27, 1988 30 DAY NOTICE CLOSING DATE: July 27, 1988 / CORPS OF ENGINEERS NO 071-0YA-4-007829 . , . , (Red Rock Creek - Fill) OREGON DIVISION OF STATE LANDS NO: 4859 --,,,: ',..„ - , " ,'',. .,., ,, ,f,, ,, : ..„. - , ,,. ,. . ..,...„ ,. .., . t 4•:',.. ,, , ; ',., ,.., ,, ,,,.1.., • ,',,. , . • ,••. . . Interested parties are hereby notified that application has been received for a Department of the Army permit for certain work in waters of the United States, as •.., described below and shown on the attached plan. APPLICANT: John C. Knez, Senior . 8185 SW, Hunziker Road • , Tigard, Oregon 97223 •. , Telephone: (503) 620-6142 • LOCATION: Red Rock Creek, Mile 0.5 tributary to Fanno Creek in Tigard, Oregon, Washington County. PROJECT 'DESCRIPTION: Place approximately 6,000 cubic yards of rock and concrete on approximately four acres of seasonally flooded emergent wetlands, The fill will raise the , , elevation of the site two feet above present elevation. Red Rock Creek will remain ., • in the nondevelopment easement on the east side of the property. H ' ' NOTE: The applicant watts to consider mitigating the wetland losses on the 30 foot , wide nondevelopment easement between lots to the west of this proposal. No specific . plan has been developed. PURPOSE: To build a self storage facility composed of 15 buildings with 28 storage sits pet building. 1' .. , . DRAWINGS: Two sheets marked 007829 (Red Rock Creek - Fill) . ADDITIONAL /NFORMATION: Additional information may be obtained from William D. 1 , Peterson, 46 Condolea Court, Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035, Telephone (503) 636-6170, or ' . . Jim Turner, Project Manager, Portland District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, P.O. Box 2946, Portland, Oregon 97208-2946, telephone (503) 221-6995. ' ... AUTHORITY: This permit will be issued or denied under the following: , . , ,.. : Section 404, Clean Water Act (33 U,S.C, 1344) , for discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United 8tates, ) - .7' NPP VOrili 1145-x , mar 88 , , ,. h. 0, • ., « N 0 Ir ', ; t , r x 1 • CENPP-PL-R , 1N-007829 1. • 1 SPECIAL CONDITIONS: The requested permit, if issued, shall be subject in part to },`• the following conditions: a, All construction debris shall be disposed of in such a manner that it cannot l� ;.. ' L. II 4 enter. the waterway. b. All areas along the bank, disturbed or newly created by the construction activity, shall be seeded, sodded, revegetated, or given some other equivalent type of protection against subsequent erosion. c. Work in the waterway shall be done so as to minimize turbidity increases in : the water that tend to degrade water quality and damage aquatic life. ii f idlid aWv itthy e iDs idvy gianffe ng fin nor tiwfle by ihr agency y e hv ea t i ‘.. thereof, and when the District Engineer subsequently directs remedial measures, the . permittee shall comply with such directions as may be received to suspend oi, modify !i - the activity, to the extent required to mitigate or eliminate the adverse effect. i '' f, You must take the actions required to record this permit with Registrar of Deeds or other appropriate officials charged with the responsibility for maintaining • records of title to or interest in real property. WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION: A permit for the described work will not be issued " until certification, as required under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (?.1„ `' 95-217) , has been received or is waived from the certifying state, Waiver will be . ; deemed to occur if the certifying state fails or refuses to act on the request for , Y certification within 45 days. Attached is the state's notice advertising the request, " for certification. SECTION 404(b)(1) EVALUATION: The impact of the ar Avity on the public interest will be evaluated in accordance with the Environmental ar'rotection Agency guidelines pursuant to Section 404(b)(1) of the Clean Water Act. a PUBLIC HEARING: Any person may request, in wrIt:ing, within the comment period ' specified in this notice, that a public hearing be held to consider this application. ,,''- Requests for public hearings shall state, with particularity, the reasons for holding • .•r a public hearing, {,,• , ENDANGERED SPECIES: FreliminatiJ t determinations indicate that the described activity will not affect endange ed species, or their critical habitat designated as r ` endangered or threatened, under the Endangered Species At of 1973 (87 Stat. 844) , `'" ` normal consultation under Section 7 of the Aet is not required for the described . ,, activity, i '' FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT: Evaluation of the described activity will include • conformance with appropriate State or local flood plain standards ti consideration of t alternative sites and methods of accomplishments and weighing of the positive, y' • conc r,ntrated and dispersed, and short'- and long- term impacts on the flood plain, • 2 • , r , A /' . 007829 (Red Rack Creek - Fill) x, . '. , f, .. .. ..::.. .: .. .. . .. .. .� . .. ,.,�. r, a ... .., . ,. r ...., ., ,. r.. .,... ,. ,... ,. . , . �. ,. . .�. . � N` I\ AcFsio J-wdY ' 'O Ii was Q�'� VIC,INITY MAP .` �.' '°, . _WI\ so 5c.d4.1..n. r f;ui'WAy at v CFfE AA 1-4 dGMiv&y ?4A p) ,',' f f5 ■/&,,,, „ V ' I \ 6 • , , // ,11,______.\\J . k kuwatuptra Q • • • • • c R Q NH P k a K 2 t 1\\\\ \ , , . .. `'~,__--.. r pu aU7 X L ,,7 R•tIGI' t✓hvy /.17 ' ft -/L. . , y : t I . . , lij .() 1 .q ff I ,, 41`4C)1.ks d fis,c.Az a 4 , b. # / vil 0;X i / k. NICI u .,,,+ o d '1?. te ' ' izt y. / W�.1 � .' �` id ,/� � . 1 4*0 1' i fl I ' a J., \ n �s /1W 4 r f : Le L M ��la..r 1's a ' '� 1''''' ''4 , it R''''.2 D 120C 0‘',..,. Cl/-1PICM3X 0) • ....c ' P-40 T : 'Si re`�Y:1 '6r� T A T d vral4Cd. .. . ft∎p VILA. WILL LaL AVSMAG I. t L 0' r gtac ticNiTirte 41- Tom► 'I°5 i' pta F OOM,% 1 woe Lccde� 5 62 pe6.GtF �::. a , D1d dcd r PrzCAPIO .'N CI tt litti'. IUD: Mg® , ' I P i_nc! a - .WO old Tot,A.Modwo' 4N14., 0', 440C, 1 A o I g. 9 L L1 1 c. u11 it 4.etkito►pe VAN # 5 60,4041 . .pfo U N1'r _mod 0Alret 1,4►FED. te44 l' .i,et P CEPP-PL-R 1.. PN W 007829 . . CULTURAL RESOURCES: The described activity is not located on property registered or eligible for registration in the latest published version of the National Register of Historic Places. This notice has been provided to the State Historic Preservation Office. rY , EVALUATION: The decision, whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impact including cumulative impacts of the d`e.scribed activity on the public interest. That decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefit which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the described activity must be balanced against its reasonably ' foreseeable detriments. All factors, which may be relevant to the described activity Y will, be considered including the cumulative effects thereof; among, those are conservation, economics aesthetics general environmental concerns, wetlands, ' historic properties, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, floodplain values, land use, navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral . needs, consideration of .,property ownership and in general, the needs and 'welfare of ;� . • the people. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS: State law requires that leases, easements, or permits be obtained for certain works or activity in the described waters. These State requirements must be met, where applicable, and a Department of the Army permit must be obtained before any work within the applicable Statutory Authority, previously indicated, may be accomplished. Other local governmental agencies may also have d . ordinances or requirements which must be satisfied before the work is accomplished. • Comments on the described work, with the Corps of Engineers number, should reach this ' - office no later than the expiration date of this Public Notice to become part' of the ' record and be considered in the decision. 1 .•:ter _°' 1 1 r • b " 1 in I ' J• w.A N ' , 1; w d 007829 (Red Rock Creeks Fill) lb% , • " I ■ 0 , Pi i ►�,�a r- 1, 1 0 VAC tiz,L.000 MAW IS 160 r p a�&ISTIr G SITE !d l ' ' 41::: ::11., 2„ R+p ocA41:0 P101 LL Me f 1..1.: Mt von.Ar-sst) es,ra Pad -s;ol Ira GPI'1 'Y"1 Tv 5, orrEv4iLr.leerevdl eigt, ro . p led 1 w tx0 ®Y ►N �� .3 '4.',I`ris WIL.e. � F"�Nc® eras seO '` u ......„,,......„.........j p /,E.,........ .., 45 .. , . .. /If ti 6 x•. . , ......41 . ,, ic.8.4..„,..f , . , , L------________J ,k V Y99' as,s i i61'YI. a r�,akaie ca tk t 3c ...,,.. ... . • , ,4 7,, -----"' l'. 5ECTIOINIAL VIEW A,-A \,., 1 it, ....i-L,,,, 0 II 7 a O rn,s,, 1?-- -=:CI `7F----7—,- --4° „ / ,,C—''''.5'.... ----' 0* . li 41 .5 Col Lil i N gel*T • . .1------la,11 4 . i IL.k. 0 "'-'1 IL Ski -Zt iii,,Z "'i'0*--...._,1 ,.,... .4,v ■ • I , j 'el St ::7 ,.% • 4 I m r i 8 g •.......1, --______t______i i4:14./1 1 , ', '.',, n , , , , , ,fin L________.. µj . ME,T.L Syr Ill .i , ', z �I4 t9 1 1 '•-•,„,,,:.... c,i,s,t,,),,,.,:,,, eir4A,LNI 0%9 01/,- lim . iu$L01$10,6 •a. • purarpos rbtir+�, �gc Lar..p. ey tiNt rito,c,a 5 , + , • • gj 60101,161 KNI111 60•0, yy{,�jjy�� i WM i • • v. � . 4 ti • I' ... •. a•.. t..., .w,..i....a M.i•...,.. • ,v 4»a,.....r 4 ' f • . r t ♦ 7 niii f: . ..,: Depart en t of Environmental Quality c;' _ , 1. Wit.0Ck.ASCFW,c0.1T, r al 1 S W S AVENUE,T� P T N 9 234 PHONE: 50� A .;Ji • .� , olki m • ate: 27, 1988 • • p i Public Notice rp The following shall constitute public notice by the P 3' State of Oregon that the Department of Environmental Quality, pursuant to the requ.retnei is of Section 401 of • 1 the Federal Clean Water Act of 1977, PL 95-217 has been requested, to certify there is reasonable assu.r nce that ' . the project described in Corns of Engineers Public ' , Notice No. _271-0YA-4--00782 • will not violate applicable water qua',ity� standards. • Comments regarding possible water qua•lit,y effects of the proposed project shall be sent v,Lthain 30 days to , the Department of Environmental Qua ity, Water Quality • • ' Division, 811 S. W. 6th Avenue, Poy Oland, OR 97204. 'i • d i . I •e i • a r b n.•�' r .it ili 11111'11 i''\�, " 3125 S.W. HALL BLVD. P.O. BOX 23397 ., TIGARD, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 r.', OREGON i L__,, '. i — I m , ..),- _ f/U 14-, `„ , ' L4tJ7j. __ ,' '-,, m -', �a.t,w <1,,,,,c - J" ",::°.',L c:',?(''','-:. 1 :'7•4(.....• " r'''•i ''«,ev„ r , ,z nI n r i�•. � „„ � �,yryF K'� �}"'�}'` 'i-..5.pr t„,,,''S r..0 r a'1 y�+ {-.Y tM i i'a,�ct}y r`r"A N1 I,;q py�� !`,,_�yyr,�,'.,w.a,'. p,�E ' •' � ! 1:!w�F'w �Yu�,t� .!�.';`1 Y' y.✓eu.��.N�'p!1' '�^a�rdrak..y ii�'�r rl°�9 '� �rINY,nr�C?•„�f+W,,�i}�•'"ia �,�Y�"''h �...Ii,�.A:.:L.:...u..a` .I....:..r '. r., . � 1c ))'�� F� �„N !�''� +y} b .rr � .( G'�'Y`Qt�.... 4�� 1 7r 4N �� 4� .na,..�i...�'1,aN a .�. , AP �.,...� ,��Y1L,,,,..1,�,:.,:.r4�6,..�.d_l�',.",� /�„f"" 1 1'. 4 4 i �''..�::�.� l "F�.,)��v.� � ,.,.t1...,< r W„F-f.:r.w' f � . " Y ' l�• ..W "'__,,...1___;_,.1!3 . \ 0.16, 4 y ,r ..w ,.,,,,,,..1 1 ,r...�.....�..�--'-•--»......�..... - _ _ �'1 ... a t ; 1 �r�/',��I� fir!" 6 ".LW.1.,,, 14, #::)..C2e.I)91],,,,tOti N)04.* el. ,, I.,V I ,ifil I . t,, .., �' .u,� 7'^"" 1'""1'Y.: ,i,. . 1. Id �� ( A )_ An �� :wN ��. ��r5i ' ny , ' 4 IwHSwM...i'CnH M�.I )f A r i t.J R i'r e(41,-,Y..i..wn '7 l�r+�•''.:�'. 'ir i r',., f "^^t, ,.f' 4 M +ff4,' 1 ,,,,„$'Nd 1'"wfe,.."N� y +Fa.nM ,N!'�' /',v)r-.., 1. » .. rA :.µ, e:''' �,.i�) y�.•a," •F+ y,,•� ,kr1+k� ' ! ,C.C� "j'%� "� ,M'".,p R ,4:?.. ,' M y,,�y,r }µ"` `,R p�. J', .,, M�('j}„'y Y1.4- -t:9 1 fmrrpW.N f ..,�..r.�.;,riw.i:...t. 4 *:�., 'f�.w.•u ': +�v1 "J IdIC ''1 .7Wvr �,!: _ y '.t..+.n., i, V ..w 'X. D Fw ` SIGNED r� � - .. .—..„...—.4, DATt-.�... _,.-,.. 1 . r I ., „REPLY' !�r, d ,.�yP / ;.y,M i" x +L d, ..'''a A )�, MI,.)7 +' � R 4a.'ru. 1 * ""a•iwN/-i) 4,�..as-1,.n'a I W. .." r'r ' � r I• r �,L,/''��1 Y�l,J PLEASE RETURN ORIGINAL COPY WITH R �YN KEEP PINK FOR YOUR RECORDS. YOUR COP S r 71 3!. .•H,. ...... ,-,_...,__ ,..., . .,. t...., ,,., _._ �-tea, .., .„ .,. ,. .,, .. . ., . y, ..�,,._,._ . __,_. ,E1:,. '"k J id\1?`•" 4 4 t ud t \:,,,,,,,..,.„...:q.:„...,e:..j //lir9�lllilt 14 ir , . CITYOFTIQARD RE) . . . ','' OREGON I August 19, 1988 The, Hearings Officer decision for Puget Corporation , (Case ;ro. SDR 88-12/ SL 88-02) was appealed by John Skortes because of the public street " '. improvement requirements imposed as conditions of approval. A hearing before City Council has been scheduled on September 12, 1988, to review the appeal. • It is agreed by Puget Corporation, John Skortes, and the City of Tigard , , Community Development Department that the street improvement questions ; is an issue separate from the development of the Puget Corporation'' property and that ' grading and building permits can be issued, prior to the resolution of the appeal. The design approval and, completion of street improvements (as ■ required by Council) shall occur prior to issuance of occupancy permits. " • ACKNOWLEDGED: , 4 . ,, , \ ..x , .1 I A b. ,Alf 4 ,...,'44.4., ,. 1 Geof .'Le'vear, President Jo n R. Skortes Keith S. Li,.en Puget Corp. of Oregon Senior Planner , .• cc: Brad Roast 1 . Randy Cooler L' ' ' 13125 SW Holl Blvi✓l,,P,0,Box 23397,11gard,Oregori 9722 50 639-4171 -- ; 4 t.. • • • • September 9 , 1988 . Mr. Keith Liden, Planner City of. Tigard { Planning Department 13135 H Blvd. 5 S W a a_l Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Puget Corporation . .. ,„ BuiJ in IAddita{on • a Dear Mr. Liden: , This letter is to request a delay in providing the dedication of the 100-year flood plain area and the right-of-way along ` 74th avenue until the site work is completed We will not + able, to provide an accurate plain fl .:. be p accurate description of �the and � at this time ' Piget Corporation will agree to make both dedications a condition of the occupancy permit . As you are aware, it is very important that we p..oceed with construction, which is now held up pending issuance of the building permit Thank you for your attention to these details . I• i Sincerely PUGET� T CnRPC7RAT1CJN IAA 7 }' / �) Geoff Lev'ear � President <, GL/cs • c � ,� e .. • .. •ill��•. , 1 , • ., {'� f• • , y�r { I I '•{ 1. .�, September• 8 , 1988 . 7235 S.W. Bonita. Road Tigard, Oregon 97224 • • I � �ru f v.4 •"d A . Hr. Keith Lideri City of Tigard ' lrFiiA Department . , 1135 S.W. Hall Blvd. �� ' Tigard , Oregon 97223 ; Re : Puget Corporation Proposed Bldg Addition • dear Mr. L i d e,n. • As you requested in our telephone conversation on September 7 , 1988, I am providing the following information. • 1) We would like to remove the 2 apple trees along the soUth 'property line. Both trees have disease and dead limbs , which we feel will he a future hazard. In addition, the „ falling fruit will be a nuisance every year. Since these trees provide very little buffering n� to the� site,� �I I feel that their , removal will not have a significant impact. Until. You have. considered this matter we will act to protect the "trees during cons tr:,uct i° 'l, We intend to rope off the area prior to grading ' of the parking area, die do anticipate some root damage when n the storm drainage l line is installed along, the south property i.i n e�. 2 ) Regarding the parking lay o u"t along ,le south ti property� � � � line ; it will remain as shown if the 2 trees are retmov ed z If , we must save the trees , we will then remove 4 parking spaces) • to allow or the tree ire l s 3 ) In Legard, to the landscaping plan, the City of Ti rar•dl .. minimum standards and requirements for plant sizes are assumed I • • • • I � I I I II i I I I I •� � � yam .` Iu. Septembe ' 8 . 1988 Hr . Keith Liden ff . it 5 I . 4) Two new handicapped parking spaces will replace two exist4,..:ng spaces in the north parking lot on Bonita Avenue. The p. site plan for the im provements does not include this area on . the drawing. If additional drawings are needed; please let me know. Thank yot for your attention to this matter, . , j2,.,0 Sincerely, r ' SABRE COICSTRUC'TION COtift'ANY John E. Soutinen Building Consultant .+� J...I J P 4! B: j sYy • > Avenue in 1382 At that time, no development by the landowners °' was planned and ':he City limited the construction costs imposed on the landowners to $95,000. That limitation required a revision to the street standard to an "interim" standard to keep the costs within the budget. In 1984, the City approved a small expansion to this facility and made no change in the "interim" standard for the street. However, the applicant is now before the City to nearly f ' t double the size of its opetttion. The City consistently requires applicants to bring roads and utilities to standard in i conjunction with new development. The is no dispute that the } road as presently built, is not to standard for an industrial area The hearings officer believes that,' unlike the burden inposed by a local improvement district which is implemented regardless of the economic climate of the time, an expansion such as the one proposed indicates that the ,applis ..n;t's business is 1 ; doing well and it is now time for the applicant'' to assume its responsibility to meet the 'development standards as published and enforced by the City. The "interim" is over and this road should ' be brought up to standard as part off:` this development. NOW THEREPORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED .THAT SDR 88-12 and SL 88.,. r 02 be and hereby are approved, suh j ect to the �o�:,�,o g � conditions: 1. PRIOR TO TIDE ISSUANCE OP BUILDING PERMITS, THE F+OLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE S ATISFIED. STAFF CONTACT FOR CO DITION ' r GARY ALFSON ,NONE NUMBER 639-4171; FOR, CONDITIONS H[-` , LEITH • r • i LiOt T, PHONE NUMBER 635-4171b a, Standard h� � f-str� et ii roveMents, in lud ing yl • . concrete sidewalk, drive wa y apron, curb, asphaltic concrete p avement, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, streetlights and uderground utilities (as practical) , shall be installed along the 74th Avenue frontage. Improvements shall conform to the alignment of existing adjacent improvements. The pavement thickness shall consist of 4 inches of asphaltic concrete pavement on 3 inches of (3/4 0) and 12 inches of (2 -0) aggregate baserock. The existing pavement shall be overlain with 2 inches , of asphaltic concrete from the centerline to the west edge of pavement. b. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the 74th avenue frontage to increase the right-of way to 25 feet from the centerline. The description shall be . tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms and approved by the Engineering Ir Section. Dedication forms and instructions are available from the Engineering Section. C. The northern driveway-shall be relocated or deleted 1 a to comply with the 30 foot spacing requirement.rem ent be tw ern driveway aprons. d. A permit or evidence detonStrat compliance p in g c omp shall l 1 v be obtained by the applicant from the U.S . Army Corps of a �n�ineers (Authority: Section 4b4 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. ) for discharge of dredge or fill material into k 13 4 4 o 0 �>Taers of the United States. A co py of the permi t shall be p rovided to the . ^ City Engineering i Office by p f the applicant.c�in•t» � e. The applicant shall provide for roof, and parkin ' pp p 1 nd �p parking lot rain drainage to the nubl is stor water drainage syste m • \ : o ..; 'le public f. Five (5) sets' of plan Yland P rofi P im rovement construction plans and one (1) itemized . construction cost estimate, stamped by a Registered Professional Civil Engineer, detailing all proposed public public improvements shall be submitted' to the gngineering Section for .approval,.. Two (2) sets e plan and profile plans shall be submitted for preliminary' review prior to submittal of final plans. g. Construction of proposed public improvements shall : not commence until after the Engineering section has approved public improvement plans. The section will require a 100% performance assurance or letter of Icommitment, with p: .yment of permit fee and a sign installation/streetlight fee. Also, the execution of a street opening permit or construction compliance agreement shall occur prior to or concurrently with the issuance of approved public improvement plans h. A revised site and landscaping plan shall be submitted for Planning Director approval which includes the d following items: (1) The parallel parking spaces near 74th Avenue shall have minimum dimensions of 8.5 feet by 20 feet. (2) northern driveway in the new parking area 2 The north parking shall be omitted. (3 ) Specific species and size of landscaping materials shall be identified. I 1 (4) Specific plans illustrating how the two trees located in the so .'thern parking lot will be saved as indicated. p g I I (5) two handicapped parking pace within easy I I I I building entrances. esa l d�:n g �t.n to ac dp. �s to a31 "d to the be dedicated shall • b d a.. The 100 year floodplain public from Bonita Road to the south property boundary. The dedication documents shall be on forms approved by the City and shall be recorded with Washington County. 2. All items noted in condition 1 (h) above shall be. installed prior to occupancy of the nevi 20, 000 square foot addition. 3. This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final decision date. unit and any other outdoor � . The air �conditioning Yf Mechanical equip ment shall co�p1� with app lic male DEQ noise standards. DATED this day of July,, 1988. HE• .,, TGS� OFFIC R APP'0V"ED o ,-"' i T E T SON :�. 5 i 4 S , • CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. I -•- _ • • A RESOLUTION ADOPTING POLICIES FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT, REQUIREMENTS ON SW 74TH AVENUE BETWEEN BONITA ROAD AND DURHAM ROAD WHEREAS, SW 74th Avenue between Bonita Road and Durham Road is not improved to full City standards; and WHEREAS, T.M.C. 18.164.030 requires that stv'.eet improvements be provided by developers as conditions of development except where such street improvements would not be timely; and WHEREAS, the City Council has heard testimony regarding certain unwritten understandings reached at the time of formation of SW 74th Avenue ,Local Improvement District No 27 in 1982 and pertaining to the timeliness of street improvements on SW 74th Avenue; and . WHEREAS,, Resolution No. 84-74 provides evidence of a previor.ts City Council's intention regarding street improvements as conditions of development within the boundaries of Local Improvement District No. 27; and .,. WHEREAS, in a workshop meeting on October 17, 1980, the Council reviewed information relating to the timeliness of street improvements on SW. 74th Avenue; • NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: R ,, ,' Section 1: The City Council adopts the following policy relating to future development °project along S eW'a 74th Avenue between Bonita Road and Durham Roam 1, That developers rs c f properties outside the 1982 LID � 74th . Avenue Local Street Ifproversent District No 27) be required f. to construct .'two-thirds street improvements" to commercial 1 ' j street standard per TMC 10.164,030(z)i "Two-thirds street , improvements cans half-street plus one travel 'lane, adequate to provide for two-way traffic. That developers of � .2. Tha p �,f within the 1982 LID: A. Be required to construct half-street improvements to' local street 'standards, r; ;. ? Rs G:'$ required to execute a waiver, of the right to re t, nstrrate against a formation of a "s=uture local i improvement district foraged for the purpose of increasing the' streets pavement' thickness to commercial street standards. i O -A332, Page ' , r • • • r L. ✓, ,., «..•4..o-,....--ww...1 A.... r... ,............,r _ v t � ' r C, De advised that the future improve , s Aent district will be . formed at such time as truck traffic volumes along SW 74th ' . Avenue warrant the additional pavement thickness. 3. That any development likely to generate substantial volumes of heavy truck traffic may be required to construct additional, interim street improvements adequate to accommodate the ,,., . • • expected truck traffic. Section 2: The policy statement above is intended as an advisory guideline for the ;Approving authority in establishing conditions of approval for any development along SW 74th Avenue between Bonita Road And Durham Road, • PASSED: This 42'41141 day Of t C ..�t.J _ • 1988 • ATTEST: Mayor - City oP Tigard • Deputy Recorder City of Tig g Aed APN OVF 1,AS TO FORM: f` Cl t Recorded Date /7 6 440 • • • • 1 t_SOLu'tXDN NO{ t 0-1/62:P. ':. • A PAge 1 • r " .,,e,.,+,A 4Trs t�dl g.t � 'u` , , w , y.. e '�, r ,I,w�N�� 1y r , s Staff Review K • ---.. .,� CII`Y OF TIGARD C , � ' � � �� ,.-�E' ' , �✓ � , � � COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT � �� ii •. CHECKLIST � �, � ��,�; � PRE APPLICATION� � �• ., . ' g I�c'c ''''.n 4'a'' ., 'f,r" ,d' f '' ' "''''', Date Eg A " 5w - q • Ilfls ? tr IAA 1. APPLICANT , .OFF & M 'e —' .. . '; e . 06,1 eg,ilik 1°*4144 4 445r'° 2, PROPERTY LOCATION t • • d . ,� , � .._ Tax Map/Tax Lot I I t'M L , .,;, 61q P :',) i.. • • ∎. ��3 PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION/NECESSA ,Y APPLICATION(S) 6 , 4.__ P,. g ( tt1`�4t � _._„, 8. Lws .d'\1� ,. ,w,...,_._.Q` ►t14,/0 f M,4 11161,,1L....,r + shki L;'s . '� l'''QP l''''. ,7i` lr 1,4 r) . 'a_ 14 AsC; e.i it1C 4(�p �S`4"'U''�+girl?"w 4:*(') i4','f,"A`rkrl,k.,:. AL ., ,r., U E �� I P't Q?:,., - m t.,� 1 Existing k: � � � t • Adjacent Property ),,,, , ' , ,go: • ' north G " ' �, south ' ` �' ef7fddrikleCre r. r e „S� "�� P • West , xr• , r L 'V. , 5, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION L 1 j,0e4la ,o, 4,,"0 It 6 ZoNING DL'sIGNATIoN .. * ' P(r i `l` + ,l _....� 7, NEIGHBORHoOU PLANNING oRGANIZA 'ION NO ) CHAIPPERSbN ,m,.ti#ZA k,�; //eVIVP,,,l'":' PHONE .6..._3q-4,7?, ..:,:._...__... _.. X11' s, CODE REQUIREMENTS Mihimusti lot si e/width i w 1. r - t ti7�' l�bV{�i f\n11 front rw`.,�'MW�r - corner IIC:iI Ii✓,' Y�� side rear YF«:....:........w..v:... ' 8 ecial s ths; streets �. . ..> e$ta �is h�0 o"ll"eaS .. " 1owe�' irytensity zones wetlands - o. , flab lot ....., accessbry stt'UctUV'es 7,ero lot 'line - ; f , Ma ximum lot coverage Maxiasum g buildin height ,/,, '.,�•: _.. .I t. a .. na.a. nM.r..,•«�I .. w ..n ...........ran.....11....u..+U4 ...,,a.+.+ r .s r - u.- -s 1...41..1 ....+....n A,.«.WGn-,.:)+r.-a.#...4+_.aaa,mar•.:.0 Mnn.i..4 n «.J pa' rrrl grew fir F'w :�irt P "H r, x• ;; ---' Staff Review r/r�1C' CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT• PRE--APPLICATION CHECKLIST {' � s 9 .irk u. , �.. APPLICANT :A � .�..� 2. PROPERTY LOCATION ' Address 0 IA/ � hite tlet 4 4'0 :.:�� y-ig) ,K0A Tax Map/Tax Lot 1 J J \'( , r; wras wM f 8. PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION/NECESSA Y APPLICATIONS) r G1 • ,�{��6 q3 '`4,ir' 1�w t .¢"1i �a,'. .y• =1.11'j',�7,, j1�� `ar',��1gA `',� ,r�+y, ^.',i�+��11ygfg�},C• ry tryyr(t 4 '�'Y �t1'�r�71k @..�' p�li y+� j1,)1. t,1� K+ •' (wa...«. .M.�'[ !Nb , " e a9 1V is f Y !y,'S7RY;'la 5v+^'+ie.a�FP+n'Aw' 7F�"� 4�$'rc e9 e '."' # tF f1A16Y�M',. Mh M';7- 14 Ii ,Rat' S Aw k),s M to e.4 h{.fit,`„ x y, F 44;t4 '�,�+�W� 4 h�P • , iw4 4 .w ,�1..�'�"��'Ab`�' E�i�� f�'C.�:.V,('4r? '�,�k�a� �;; 4 USE rc � tic( � � ," •� '1'11071A 9. pia ' Adjacent Property ,. north , W� south ....... : A0>° ter, east 6v tit;W " west ,+,e' 5 COMPREHENSIVE PLAII� DC SCV NA C I:V N t I.1', 6, ZONING DESIGNATION a"". �u / �'�r �� •• 7, 0R1-10Ob PLANNING ORGANIZATION O� C1 AIRPER ON P H x..'11 1 tom"s S, CODE REQUIREMENTS yaa . Minimum lot size/width Se,t. a bt1(s t front,� 7 o nt ��.. G a r k1 e r �' `�� s x.d e ". rear � Special setbacks*, streets A, , es to,blihed areas lower int.ensity zches �_...:w wet Land flag lot acces sory structures zero lot line • • Maximum lot coverage, Maximum building height 'a • Jegu I Special height limits flag lot other _ Density calculation _.. Density transition __ 1 Landscaping: minimuc. % of lot area '"' t '"x ' ,, owl ' Street Trees (.1),I0Ae.' � 4, `r` ',7� 1,� .°' � ,' ° � �ts �" '`00' Buffer Areas „ • Parking Areas __.. . ._.. Visual clearance .• � ° 0.00cti4,, V 1,(6114 ° " _..... : .0 'ct Parking and loading t c', ac 4 l� Access and circulation '3 �j?+' e"t., „4" 4 r il;tn L":.eo.: f' ' Signs 9 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS (flee application ,chccillist for specific items Sensitive .ands. floodplain v VdraineuJy >25% slope_ 6+1'nd s M iv-prNi� is 7 $ aF i(K, .r gal) (. .. �4 ? /'ir i�` n"^ t:i� p "�i k ''i{d•'"�,y' 1"',',p^t " , • Open' space ------, r''` �''t4t ilk' m Swa YSt 3 111 f k Historic overlay .:., • Street improvements/connections/bikeways .fit ,, �.f' � r� t_- la trtn • + ii,A. _-,.. � r'�,�*�� :3w� �°+R'toi �,.k'i �`li.rdt�wa�� irt D�x"�' di Y Right—of—way dedication Sanitary Sewer improvement Storm Sewer improvements Improvement Agreement Permit Bonds; Fees f f w 4 ' n rOther agency permits L�v v {1 t f 10. PROCEDURE ►dMinistrative staff review .. ..1 . '"a ,i t&LjidEeteit6'':«�'.i� 1 Public Neal^x tngs Officer Win '°� �' !, , r°, .c °,-'2a Public Hearing/Planning Commission The Administrative or PUblic-ra siren' b Nearing shall occur ap proxa m ately 0 days after a complete application is filed. A to—day appeal period follows all decisions, 0573P/0022P I . ..1 ,_..-..•.,Rr-.. ..,ai. .ii e_.. .•,..... .y... .,... .,. «... ...... ....... ... ... ...... ..........«..-. .• �. .,.. .............__.. r....,..1 ,�...�... • •�..... ..... . • .,.........l,wa...«—. ...�..a.J� .1rx ,•�i.....,.Ji i.�....e�.�»4i....nd..n.,.Yi \ ' , .......t. sT __,-) ,,,,,....„ . .Pi l', .y`•1 • ' ,4011W /-p \ .te.;1.• . . .,, .,„''. ...tdallirlfiii ..R.:7 •:4�I III z .� ..,. . ......„ ,, .,,,,,,A ,„.„...., ,.• s.w 1. rG��°„ , . . _ . i c ili• ,.,1 , 7----.-- ..•11111111114. - (I41 is � -•.,,•.i.... ter..,.. i.,, � _. ,�� ..... .,.. .,„.,,,..,... , .,„ .., . _I•.....,t_____,.,ilis?AS : 27:..1.oki ;• I itubk�r1� ..�. •�� rqn a rrC \\\\ _� --- -•-~-1 ii a L. : VON- 1111 — _12 ,. .* s �« �/ ND. �' .--^i •• _.., .n. r ... .�L[ imam, , , 1/41 i' 1 Ird 9.9t MN ''. 1 ' IO 0 ,a. t.,,,,,, „To (..0,",:il 1 • Iri OR b�`�ii I . , ii 11111 AM , ,.� "' _ _1 dit • 3,';.,otiN ,;.,'II a,� tea! �_. •--- 11 �,. ''_�• 11111111 , r 7ri�,IFl S.(Y, aQSr3 CTRL �t - ,......� : � �r`.� Y ' (.,. 11 �• b 13 IA11 .. , iii : lirt, 1 7-17 . .,.i \ % , ill :! ,4.......I. 1 , R-1 , _ R-7 . 1.104.4 .. , .. ..___ , ' r , .E, 6 I(AYLC LM 1 (( ti ��.K,r'"' �• a f�m �. .. • ..,. , '.' . , ,' .,, ifie,"7:.,..47, ,, : ... , . ...,..---.,;, . . . ....N . „. .- , ,, , s , ,,,prips,;r's 4'1'gal' ..--- l'' . ,,.. . , 0. 44.);11-114P6Aimm t - ---- ,i ii .AT . , ., .• , wag g 0 7 (1 i�a r 1 Iasi I � �.a .... �, ,� 4%, )L USA - ,.... . 4.' '„)./. ontilau .4 N.,' ril NT $.743, e•/ �y I e . . ..,, f t ', _ y�IIW ... :, • e w. Mi , e` 444 ' P . i O ,, ',!.f.':,,?../ ? aJ ,,. „ M .cY "K ,, l t .c ` 'y,0#6ttlti wit( tall ' - ir.A F ( ��y'� ;,}. 4'r+., • d' "" 'IY in:, a A 4:111;14 '' ` , 9.,r"fr ,,,,r'4� , NI Zt ;f Y..„�^�''�'i��7 V'•� ,,�y ••. ■ '�, • !'• . • M` "� YWC�'r•Ai^`.,w=e.�+f.' P •� 4...r,, 1 0 4 t �* µ II, I ),4 h �, � � i fir'•' x" '�l,r+�#r ii$7, , , M t 3 N Futl w .�,.� t el,s�..•„,..,,...,.... ,�. .. r. , ry , a , ....,,,,.. .. „ ■ • • • 25,�}iJaank ..\Jn lrt �.��•�t r. .,... �+...,._,.�e..,_,.» ..H._�..,u sr +.. * w.,.,«•, �;v �,.)��.�.�,5�"�7�JV �.,.i.:.Jr♦ �7Y7 4,..,.�:.w.i..0�Ltiu.t ...7LYK1xY�Ytft\�3�[LiJ :.Lrr�)r}Z,SC ... rwr:JiS.�f..iJ4tL77• 5 SLX, .,..�...., .,� ... h 1 `1 �Yt� � +. w is:.12i.1u:r ''aha„ )r. csx).)�i>1ltxid‘.t y • Staff 4,,-" Date ,a; ' CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ' . • • APPLICATION CHECKLIST . The items on the checkli Y • b) Proposed streets or other public ways ,& easements ^,• on the site, EP{ a• c) Alternative r r r osed routes dead end or o t^outer �f streets that require future extension [ `] . 4) The location and dimension of: a) Entrances and exits on the site [t b) Parking and circulation areas 1:111 „,, � . � c) � Loading and �services areas �� ' � � � � [ �.. d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation [ e) Outdoor common areas, E 1/ . f) Above ground utilities [i,1 A.0 5) The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, . Utilities'and easements whiti are located on the site and on adjacent pre..�aerty' within 25 feet of the site b) Proposed structures, improvements, , utilities and easements on the site [t 6) Storm drainage facilities and analysis of _ downstream conditions [1 7) Sanitary sewer facilities C�� 8) The location of areas to be landscaped Et„," 9) The location and type of outdoor lighting " considering crime prevention techniques � � � -], , 10) The location of mailboxes 11)' The location of all structures and they v orientation [1,1",„ 12) Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements E C) C!a i plan (No: of copies VO ,) , • .: The site development p lan shall include a-- grading plan at i , . the . same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall , contain the following information: 1) The location and extent to which gracding'will take ' place indicating general contour lines, slope ratios - _, of year and soil stabilization proposals, and time o yea it is proposed to be done. A statement from a registered engineer supported by , data factua' substantiating: ,,� bsurfa a est ioration and geotechhical �� uu � p g . , . engineering report [ � b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposalg, c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they Will be''mitigated [4' 6 � copies D) Arch�.tectUral. Ur�awih...s (I�o: � p ): � • The site development plan propOsal shall include 1) I~lbor� p :Ions indicating the square footage of all •'' ) Is j ge � structures proposed for use on-site; and 2) Typical elevation drawings of each strActUre, 1 . . � E) Landscape Plan (No. of copies the [, j The landscape oar shall b e drawn at same s ca le of the al or . ale if necessary site analysis plan y �? a larger scale y and h r shall indicates 1) p. .. p t y of the irrigation. � ], ��' Description � �� .. � system 'where applicable � C �, 2) Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings • APPLICATION CHECKLIST - Page .. H,.. . .. «r,.......,.•... .. , w r. ,,wr..+w< x'.,.4:J. nrr a.H. ♦ ..... -t•+r.,,s r.l-nxrik+fo,,.raxr,+•4x,r,;wgr w ..ra .xe::w , +W y'n. N+•wt"i k 4,k.vv,4w,WC'.•y x,+4 N•e ....d.. � z.•.. rc b y 7.t+.,, , ,.,.N,r„ta4 ^rt x,1.,7t3tSr1l44St 1 , 4+ r.r•rxrK6.#1!. #�SYAt1{rr k84MY,1.,d„ w, q ,.p r t GRR1It tr,?,,m„' . .. .+.... ..__..w .. .. .I.W !. ...t..l _ ..1. ...l.4....n ...t,. xt.+--A._W i.r..n.......1 .,M.,.Lnrr_.Nw.r.r..M l.d.I'd1..4YJVi...r.i,i1`se ♦v. r .. • 0,r.1.Y•1.Yr,:Y.,.Y1s.Y...r.,.i;,a,;sivsr„i:s."na t>YtV,ei.,,•;..44i:Ate.... ...a7.a:li,Y4Y1�51 Y,11 tx,YatY Y..Y,;1:-"wY«Y2111'Y1Y•YXY IfaaI9,,Y:,.Yy......,..ui.,.•.-»:+x.rta.7.r:a,r r t .rnaiG.i=,.�::.l,+i..,aii'-.:.. 1 4 ., , • 3) Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas and common open spaces E ] . 4) Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials The landscape plan shall include a narrative which addresses: 1). Soil conditions. C ] 2) Eros4on control measures that will be used. [ ] F) 5T Dr wince Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter • ` ` . h 18.114 of t he Co de as part of• Site Development ent Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct the sign. C ] G) o estimate Traffic generation estxm I [ 3 • H) f?reliminar� artitiorr or lot line ad`ustmeni" ma showanc (No. of Copies ) w 1) The owner of the subject parcel [ ] 2) The owner's authorized agent [ ] 3) The map scale, (2050100 or 200 feet=1),' inch nort, h arrow and date C ] • 4) Description of parcel location and boundaries C ] ' 5) Location, width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel [ 6) Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25 feet of all property lines C ] 7) Location and width of all water courses C ] trees with 6 or greater caliper at Location of an t p 8 �. g ) y 4 feet above ground level greater �� 9) � All slopes g ter than 25% C ] • 10) Location of existing utilities and utility easements [ ] 11) For major land partition which creates a public street: ti '1 a) The proposed right—of—way location and width C ] b) A scaled cross—section of the proposed street plus any reserve strip [ 3 12) Any applicable deed restrictions C .:.. , not pill I I 18) Evidence that land partition w� preclude efficient future land division where applicable [ ]' _ N1a a data showin Noi of �) Subdivision Prelxmina.,,.�r"� F?�:�t p and ..�..g( Copies i " y, kale equaling 3O,50 100 or 200 feet to the inch 1) M per sheet proposed.. home of the . and limited to one phase pe h [ ] 2), The p �y the subdivision 1. Y i i showing... ` .; Vicinity . property's r„elatiopsrhi. to 4. 3) 1Pxc map � ar9ter ial and collector streets C ] 4) Names, addresses Iand telephone numbers of the owner t develo p er en • p � c3i�Aer , surveyera designers as. applicable ) Date of application 6) Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided C ] 7) Names of adjacent subdivision or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of unsubd i . land t �. �vxded 8) Contour lines related to a City--etablished bench- mark at 2—foot intervals for 0-10% grades greater than lob C ] r I I . APPLICATION CHECKLIST Page 3' A r t s • .....a•.r..x.,.ani,4.nr.-nr.+.r....e4.-1..«n,..•x.(:'tx. �, •r 1 to • - ` 9) The purpose, location, type and size of all of the following (within and adjacci'it to the proposed subdivision) a) Public and private right—of—ways and easements b) Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines [ 3 a c) Domestic water mains including fire hydrants [ 3 d) (Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 bolts or greater) . . e) Watercourses C ] 1 . f) Deed reservations for parks, on space, pathways and other land encumbrances 10) Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and . storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated [ 3 11) plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and fire hydrants, 12) Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished i grade of ,all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposedr subdivision. t { 13) Scaled cross sections of proposed street right—of--way; ' 14) The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow C 3 I 15) Location, width and direction of flow of all water- courses and drainage ways C 15) The proposed lot configurations, approximate lot dimensions and lot numbers Where loses are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots U • 17) The location of all 'trees with a diameter 6 inches or • greater measured at 4 feet above ground level, and the location of proposed tree plantings, if any j 18) The existing uses of the property, including the location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a;.statement of which structures are to remain after platting C 19) Supplemental information including r a) Proposed deed restrictions (if a"y) C ► b) Proof of property ownership t c) A proposed plan for provision of subd11,v1sion improvements C 3 .. 20, Existing natural features including rock out- croppings, wetlands and marsh areas, [ .c I 21) If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a' , r. narrative and submitted with the application t ' ') Other Information ] AOPLIc i IOI CHEc L181" Page 4 [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] [Page Too Large for OCR Processing] , , , ,, ..,, , •5 „. . „ 1 . ,• , 5 • •, Jiii , , „,, . ,, ,, , , , 1 ,,... ,. • , , , , , . , 1 , ,.,' . , 1 'I • . "•-5,-. ,. ,5 ,. , . ,, ' '' ', ','I ,,I -• , ,,' ,' ■ , ',- r-I ci 1' „ , 1 I ,, „ ' ' ' ' = '1 4- 1 ^ I , . ^ ' -, . ... ' , ,■ L , ,, ■ , ,($ ' ■ , ,,T,, , , , ,. ■■ , ' ' I r , ■ I , ' ■ ■ , , , r, • , k , . , r r, { . .. ” ' , ' .1„, 0 ' ' ' 'r '''' ''' '''.1'''''..''4'1''''''',.'..i'”:r,:1''''';::•'''''''.•:4:''''''''''1.''L';',.'''''',■■■:'''',''',,,,,:'1',1'':'''■,r:::'',.:,!■,.'..IT.",P''.,:‘:'■{,.''1''r'':'7.,'...'''.''.M''+''' '?.'''.:'1'.t''''.''''''''''....''r''''. ' '..'''''''''.''''''''.''t'''' r' ' , '' , , , ' , ', '' ' 1 , , ,, ,1 , 1 r 1 r,, 1 , , , , , 1 r r , lt '' '1.'..t.:1 T I t. -'''' '',..''' '' ''...... ' L ''' rf ' ' ' '.' ' r' r'';‘ , ' ',' ' I ' ' 1 I ' ''''''' .1.'1'' ' ' '' ' ' . ' ■ , ' ' ' ' ' , S ' ' . ' ' 'I . ' '' ' ' ' ' r 1 ' , ' 1 r . ' , ' 1 ' ' ' ' ' ' ',, '(,.''-''''' '.,, . -', ',• ' . ' '' ' ' ' ' I r ' ' * ' I, , ■ ,,,1, , I , , r, , I ' , , ■ I ' , ■ , • '.' ' ,, f ' I.■ . , , , ,.,•■• I , , ,, ■, . I , , ,, I ,,, r , , , „, , , . r %, , I ' , • ' ‘ ''r ''' ' , ''-.',,, ,-, ' I • ■ 1 , . ' ' ' .1 . ' , , , , ■, I • ., 1 ' 1 , , , I, L , , ' , ' , 1 ,•l ' ' ' ' . . ' ' * , ' , r, '-` , , ,, ■ -, I , , , ■ , , , • ., , , 1 I r , ,,,, , r, , , , , 1 , ,', ,, `,.' , ' I I . ' ■ I ' , 1 , ■ .. . , ' t .' . • I • • I I ' • • t j • • 1 , , • , -I , ,I ' . \'' ' ' }':''' -' ' '''''l ' ' ' -ITA ' ' I' ' ' ' 1 ' ' ' ' ''''''•I'''''' ' r ' ''''''' ''' '1: l''' ' '1' '' '' ' ''' ' ' ' 4 ' '' 1'' . ' P.O.13, MOOD PLAIN ...........___:...,....,, . ' 1 1 , s.vv. BON . . 1 , , , , , „1 , 1, ,4,,, ,. ,1, , ,, , 53 . . . , .. ,,..',., , '1, ..it08 :1 , ,, , '. , H,,,.:, ''' . ' ' II ji GRFOTAy • , . . ., . 1 , , ,. , , ,, „ ' . I 00' ' YRI* . . ,; , 1 , ,,, , . , , , , . ,, . I F ,,, ., , 1 _ _ .......,,, ,, . , . . ... . ., . , . , , , ': . „. ''* ' , , , ... In . . i ,,, ,,, ,.„ , , -4; ,, „, , ..: , 11 II” , , , ,, ,, , FLOOD , , , , ,, . 1 , . . . ..„,,,, . . ',.', ' ,',. • ' ' ' , . 'i II' ' ' , . . , ', ., ' ., . : , * , . ' . TC 'H 1 . . ,,•,, ,,- , , 1 -4-.. ',/zs - ' , ' ' '' 1, r ' ' ' ' ' PLAIN ' ' • '' • ' ' ' '' ' p , . , _ ,. , 1 ,,,, , .,,,,i,, : ,. ...,- , ,, , . .c.,,,1 . . . , SKE , . . . • . . , , .. . , . , , „ , , , , , , ,,,,,\___ , , ,,,, _ • ,, ,, . .,, , , ., AND .13$EDICATI , , , , . , ..,. , 100 . FLOOD . . , r, 1 , , ,,,,,,, . • 1 , ' \ '' . 1 . 1, • ' ' , ' .: • ,' ,, {i ‘;.\ : 1•'-'. .,,, -. '-' . , 5'34 AND . •' ' - - '''-'43.-'. '- '-, , , , . . , 1 , , ,,, , „ . • , . , h ,, ,....._ , , 1 °1'OP il . . , , r 1 . ' Zto . 01 11 211 4DRT°''HR - ' ' ' ' ' ' , - '' ' '' ''''. '' ' ' I '..'.. , , , , , ' . z ... . . 00 FO 7 . . . ,. , , , . , , , AVE ''• •'' ' ''' ' ' TO S'r W ' 4,,,.,,,.......,1 4in.,..•...... ' , • , , 1 , , , I, • •,• . , ro 0 ..... ., ..,...... , *. ,, ., iI ' ''• ' ' • • , , • . , , , • ,. • • ' • ' ' ' ' ' ' ' l'''' ' SCALE. ' — ' 5 31 8 .' ' 1,, • , '' '. ' . 1, , 1 1 ' ,. . , . , , , DATE 68.2,, _ 30:0--,.8.-----) , ., ,, , . ''''''.'''.,.,'', ,',,,,-- , ''. ' , ',,Ir , ' ' , . , • , , ' ' '', d) ' '''''''''' '-'41‘rt'''''''''''''-- . ' , *8et,,,,,,,,, ''',',, 1 '.,, ''',, „' ''''''' '''r, ‘,,' ','''',,,,,',: '. ''' ,'„ '' It' l ' ''.3-,.,,-,'° '1(6 ,' ' ‘,,,. 5. . R°D,941 DED iiARRIs.r.meci,NGOINEAE' RGI,ss.u.ARSvEtoSfspiCvDRILAs TES ill' C's ' , ,,,c, ' ,1,,,',''',,, ,, ,'.,',',: ,, ', * 4 ' 1 25 * 4* ' .• ' ' ''': ' 1 '' ' ' ' t ' ' ' '' • ; '' 'r. '' ' ' ' \ 1 . r , TliGARD, OR 97223''..-62E137 '' ,,,.1 ARE,AF LT000 DB F)1.. \IN .. '4'3(.11,' ' 'l ,. „ '1 ', 1, ' 1, ,, 1, IF: ,,', ' ''','''...' ,° 91 . ' ,. , P,I4' °NE4 (503) '639-3453 „ , . . , . , 8 E DEEDED , • ',( ' . ,' 1 , c,i‘ , ,. ' .''1' '' ' ' . ,c). 8 ' ' TO CV OF TIGARD t.o. , . .,, . ' . ,',,,,', 'H. ' , ' FOR GREENWA'i'fl Srt), . , ,:, , ., ,..,, .,, . , , , . , , .., , ‘t .240.50 , . , , + . ,,,, ' , , 1 ' 4 4. ':H ' '' ' ' 'r ..'*"'''''''.'''..**' S 89'46'45"W .- ' /\(, • ■ , ' • rr r , r ,L ' ' ,,' ' ' ' 1 ' , I .. r r , ■ ■ . • ' ■ ,r, . 1 sDR8 - , , , . , , , , , , , , . . , ,-,,, ,..,..„„.______...........----,, .• . - -- . ', , 4 , 1 1 ' 1 ' r' 1 ' ' '' ' ,'''', '''S'''' ' ' : '4, ' ' ‘: ,',, '4', : 1 '''''' ' 4''.,'■'..''.'.4, I' l'■'''. '1 T.''1,'I.,,,,, -I,- 1..1-1'1,..,....1,ri.ii..{,1 ,111 ilt . 1. 1 .,,, ,...,,,,, . . .,,,,,,,,,, ...., ,:...,,,,,,,,,„ ...,,,,, . 4 , ,„....,,,, ,,,.. ..,..„,i,....,,,.,r,...1.4.4,1, , „ • i.., , , , , •• - '..' ,,'1 1 1 1 1 ,— ;, . 1 , .,,-,:..ir,,-,,...•.., .,, ..,,..--,,,...,,, ,..:-,.,,, t,.--,.-,:..,-,-,,-,-..T;,,...i,..,,..,T,7,.,1.-,.:..,....,..r,,.,,-,..,.:,,T„, ...,,... 5.,,,.,.-..,,,.-,..,,,..:.,.-,,,.,-,.-....,.._.,,',1.'.,'-,k,..,.r,,.''c,,,,,i-,,, ,r,:.,,.,*, ,..-•l.4-'1..:...,.,„ ,, ,....,,..,,,-i,,..,,,,..:'..,,,,r.,,t.,iwi.,-•':,,,,4'' .,r,,,..,-1 ''i':4 .';' ‘i' '11 T LI' l' ‘1 /:''11''''.,'.I. ''rli'1 I.I III' 'I', '1'I I' i'*I'' 1:':I''' 1't'''11'::'1.'*'1411 /'''''''.14i, ''''''''';'''''T'r, I 1:4', -11-rit'ii, r. ., . , Tr'-1. 1 . ITt'l..;','rl-', ,., .1 1 i 1 1 ' ' il i' 1 ' . r 1, ,, ','.1 ,i:l,'''''l , : ''''''''' .., , , ,,.. ,,.., , , 1, ., ,... ... ,,, , ,,, ,.,,I, , ., , , ().,,,J, , 1. , 1 , „, , 1 ,, 1 : ' ''. ''''''4';':'''''''''''''''‘'''''''''''''''.'' ' '''''''''''....'' ''r*1'.-:. '''''''' '''-''''.7' ."''' '''''''''' ' '''' '' 4r1'•I'I ' -1 Ir'i'j r tin ! ' , , 11 .1., : iii iii ' I,' ' ,1..,, 1 1. 8.. , ,0 ... . ,... . ...,,,,..., . , ,. .l'i,i,aiiit'' ''''.,,' ' '' ' ''' ..,,, . '' 11 ,'' ,: . ' ' '. 1,";,, ' " • ' ' ', ,, ,, 1 I 1 ' . ! - ' 1 ' ' ' ' •"""'"" ''''.' ,P•••1',E,T,,,(1,:-, , . ' ' '','+'''',‘,'.1'' '''1'.','''::*'',,,'..,,,„'„'''''' ,...,',„.',,,r;'''.1;,.,',., i..1,i*,,,,...,',f,.,IL,■'2.1,i',:'1 ,'',4''.,''''',;.:'',„',.',,,..'.....' ,''''`-'7,''--,, ...:i:-,,-,:r, ill, -- i . 1,. ''''' 1 1 H : , 1 , ,' 6 H , , , , . , No 36 . ,,,,,..,,,„, 1, ,4t. ,, , ., '_ , „ , , . ,,,„ , . ,., „.,,,,,,,,,,,,,..,, ...,.., ... ..,,,,,,,,,., ,....-,..,_. , '..,,,_......._, .. . ...,_ , , , , ,,, , .., Hi ji F ,ii:II E!fsilr.ji:DlisuE0C,:r UOM NT I I-17_,,,„, , ,., : , ' . , 1, , ,, H ,:. ,1 . , , ,. .... 0,,,,, i ,,c1 1 oz , 6 .i. litT , , .i ., ,,E, 9 . 1 ,, , .77,,.. ,,,Ill IiIr.I Ti...111 ,lizi.„1 ,11111,1,111,,t,i, ,Itill, iiii 11 .1 ., ,6 1,31, ,, ,,T . 2,0 .,. , :, . ..,. ,ii, ii,,,, iiii, 1,111 IIIHI44,:i ,7.,1%,,,,,,,,. ,',, '' . ' , ''' ' .. - '' s ,SS I ,' L.... . ' ' ••• , , • , ,. , • ' . • 9 1 ' ' 117 1 ' 1 ''' ' I . ' '1 . . , , HAN ,THIS NOTATION , , ' ', , . • ,', , , IT I i' c 63 8Z L ; tf.6' i'l'illit'i'l :11 '11,1111,1,,,,,iii,.illiiii,1110 11,1,1,111,111;711 1111 11-'11.'''''.111'‘II 'THE QUALITY OF , ,, r 1 ',. ' ' ' ••' ''''.'''',::'' -''' .* .... aii, ..i.0 '' ,„%40 Z., ft, Z I CZ 'I ii., , , ., . , , • ,, . , ,,.. , , ,,,,,,,, -i , ,, , THE ORIGINAL ' DOCUMENT .,,,,. , . pt.., ll Jill 1111 1 I ' I 111 I 1111 11111111 11'11 11'111111 ,-,, , 9. . .. .... . . • . , .. . , •... . ,„„.,...••,. , •. .,,., ,....., _ . ,iii.i.i.i''.'i,Iiii 11411 fill'.1111-1 ,1-iii ii ,i'll ,t1!1,,l',11111, 1 , . .--, -I: --_ — ,i'.:1 — I' s ilI.111111:11111,111' 111'111,i1111I1 l'ill 111'1 '1,1,111 :11111111 ,1111 ,1111111,1.1 ,,11,1,!,1 rilitii,l,1„, ,4,,, ,,i,,, ,,,,: ,,,,..., , . . . . i , . ,, , \ a .5 ... ' I ,....5 . , o ■ . . . , , 5 5 5 o 5 , , ' ' . „ i,,...,....,,..•,.,, . • ' i 55 ' I, . , , , , ,-4 , .. , 0 , . . , '' A • . , .. .... ., ,, . , . . , . ,. , . - .. . . , ,., .. . ....., , .. . , , ,,, . . . . . , , i ---.. . ,.. „ .„, . ' \ , . ,.... .„, .. [Page Too Large for OCR Processing]