Loading...
SDR8-85 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. f !tk 3 n�..b S3..ri!Y��,'..`(L,:! N,n m«�'•-k„., !r�n`!r^Z...,4d!",�'(� k'.' F+n Jn-,e:iS+r•4e`E!N 71�!tS�„,-' !”l'1.a t. •k :,`'�-l , 5 ■■/ . .,, 1I1 f " ' ''''''9 "fl k w 4,.,,,,45.4.:4444,44, r w a wx ',a9i: "AY i,r;NM,a,1,4„:,4,4 r A h.w-i,.•,, ,,•••,p.,4trny "ar ,r.rr�._x,,..w , , . •:; c Y M1 k } .l.' ,, T'-.1 is. - F + t! A i':i i 1 ! ti? i !,h 1f4 t„ ///y` . a � ':,[ f1 hQg , „ ( r ' t s. 8 • • : 1 ! !' rr.'; 4''', b{ !y,j,,.;_ ' e.`til le {f { ' f r " I ' r ' fir , 45'�F .r F d , :, r '' ' 15� rt/'' 1 1,a<n '- �,y " , � KS r I h a 'i F ` a { `�•i(, t s 4i r '1 a :' , a! '',' ' _ e' ''a.ry "t .�X.+ * Y rH. dw..,MP�h rrr✓�Y aNFr.,.,,rtnr�icH,i«.. �; ,M. a.*:t+.�u J L • • .. ..,..,.,i-...,�,.,__.w,., wN... H il,^,..r,..d�..�...,,r._4.:.:....,.-._.....,...k:.�...,a........,., ....._1:1. ....d.:,a,.....r..,,.,,...:JLw. ....6..-7..i,..w,.a ,«✓, ..r.,..., .+.,r,,.,..,.a....,...,..__,W...:a`.' ,.wa,:. ., :;k1,',4, „ i4d ';,4 «:.4�.luJ...al..4•.,.:,,,,,,,,',...a F,u4.r�: .p.jz ,..+r. -.,.a,r:.•tii a'.,.. .+.:c.•,..�. ^..:,(lCua�i�'+�'`.' , k v I .I • l': • s • • Y ,, 1. • y,1 • S r i • • • • GDR FILE CONTENTS SDR , 5 SEE ALSO LEFT SIDE : .� _ RIGHT SIDE Property Owner list !/Assessor Map/Maps/Preliminary Plat (May be attached in envelope) • "Agency/NPO Request for comments ',Legal Description/Deed _ Affidavit of Publication/TTLetter• of Authorization '1'" Applications !, Narr~atiue/Corr~espondence with Applicant `Affidavit of Mailing & Posting _ Jublic Input with copy of mailing labels Notice of Final Decision _Agency/NPO Comments V Correspondence after approval ___APPEALED TO PLANNING COMMISSION Date • PC Minutes . � FORWARD/CALLED UP TO CITY COUNCIL Date CC Minutes Resolutions or Ordinance NO, ._� SUMMARY M 1-117 RY .,�r. aw Denied A' 7roi�eri �� Date Date No of Phases Size of Lot r Gross Square Footag a • Special Setbacks Residential ` Commercial ( . Industrial' "N,A ILL/d j/(CSC 16P)R/4/87 1 1 , " � , AFH'11)AV1'1' OP MALL.ING 17 / 3 --- ,. ,, . 1 1 , , STATE OF OREGON ) . County of Washington'� ) ss. ' City of Tigard , f � I Y, jhsq,111,1',5t.'„( , l)eing 1 first uuly sword, on oath depose • and say : (Please Print) P That I am a it • re `t 7i- .. ... tor„ The City of Tigard, Oregon. . , Iu 4• ,l:hat' I served. notice of Final Decision for PlannLn g Director of which the attache d is copy (Marked Exh i bit A) upon each, �of the following in g named persons on the / , day ofc" l9$, —, by mailing to each of them at ,the address shown on e aached, list (Marked Exhibit 13) , said notice as hereto attached, deposited in the United States 1,1ait on the ` day of _ r , 198 """�", postage prepaid. ignature dpir , / „L„. , ,,,, e ,,,,,,,,:t,„?...,,,, , _. .74.4.44(...., ..,,. , _.,....____:. 1 Person who delivered to POST OFFICE' ■ I. �r"t txsc.1mgrGf‘m .�� .E7 ��9 i i �f I , � 1 the da n� � Lore me on , S b �c <, b and ,swore �u� be ;� u g r a e n Y ....._ ,.� ,, ol .. „„ (e. M „t, ,,730 ..,',1' („0/ 1.) 1,**,'r ff 1' ' /ry, 1 b Cti) ''', .;�� NOTARY PUILiC OF OREGON 17 1:3 J / My Commission Expires : (0257P) ,, ( P b• I . • ` • _.... .. ., .. i .. . ire CITY OF T IGARD NOTICE OF DECISION • SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SC)R 8-85 2 VARIANCE V 13-85 • APPf,ICATIll.t: Request by RFD Publications Inc, for Site Development Review and Variance approval to allow fora 19,670 square foot building addition and the provision of 16% of the lot area for landscaping instead of 25% and to eliminate a landscaped buffer as reg0ired by City Code on property zoned 1.-p (Industrial Park) and located at 6960 SW Sandburg Street (WCIM 2S1 IDD, lot • 701), pEgtstql11: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above described applications subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the Director has 00 his decision are as noted below. • A, FINDING NG OF FACT M 1. Background • The p1-2' (Heavy Industrial) torte applied to the subject property 1, , from 1977 until November, 188 when the designation was changed to C-P (Commercial, Professional) , Because this zone designation 1� transformed the use of this and other properties into non-conforming uses, a small area including the subject property .` was rezoned to :-p Industrial Park 2,. Vicinity Information Other light industrial uses tha t are zoned �-p l, e to the north ,. and� east, The C-P (Cr, i mmercial Professional) zone abuts the.4 property on the south and west The land on the west side is developed with an office building and parking lot, The property to the southwest and south is undeveloped, 8 , Site ;information and Proposal Description $(' A printing operation including a 22,970 square foot office/warehouse �u�ld� �g parking � a t i i loading area octuPY the property, The► applicant proposes to build a 19,679 s ,;u,taYre • ooi addition on the south ride of the existing structure. The • loading u ...'` • t be shifted to the east t and a vacant portion of th t propert y will be utilized for r additional parking As a. part of the expansion, the applicant is requesting uesting a variance to allow a 1arrdscaped area of 16% rather than 25% requirement uirement of the :;-P zone and for a ero foot setback along the southern • property '';mine whore a 10 foot wide landscaped buffer is required itio-ric or bt c xsXoN - S0R 0-85 & V 18-05 - PACE 1 r t 0 , 4. Agency and NPO Comments The Engineering Division notes that storm water runoff should be controlled so that erosion of the bank to the worth will not be .a problem for this abutting property owner. The Building Inspection Division has no objection to the proposal. The Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District indicates that all . portions of the building must be within 150 feet of any approved access roadway or an automatic sprinkler system shall be necessary. I 1 F3, ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION Except for the variance requests which are discussed below, the proposed building expansion and redevelopment of the property is consistent with the Community Development Code requirements for the i-p zone. The only . two items worthy of further discussion are noted below. Parking M1 The present operation comfortably exceeds the City's parking standards, The 20 additional spaces required for ' this expansion will be accommodated by the existing spaces and the 12 additional spaces that -! are proposed. Landscaping The landscaping on the property meets City standards landscaping plan must be submitted for the areas adjacent to the south and west property lines. The ;ode contains the following five criteria which mutt be satisfied in order to °justify the approval of a variance,, . 1, The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the Purposes of this Code, be in conflict with the policies of the Comprehensive' Plait, to any ether applicable policies and standards; and to other properties in the same zoning district or ". , vicinity; 1 1 • 2, There, are special circurr�stances that exist which are peculiar to the lot size or 'shape, topography or other circttr stanr es which the applicant r p•p ,. � � 4 ,' �� a applicable to other r �� has no control, � 1 r'�a c .. y� 1 � arse zoning and which '��! not,.� . r s �e r t+�._s � �I r •l,i��. s .�►�t�rc,�, � 4�,{ t�r��.cl� ���a district; 8, The use proposed will be the tame as permitted Hinder this Code and City standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that 1$ reasonably possible, while permitting tome economic use of the land 4, Existing physical amid natural syt•tetns, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic land forms or parks will not be advertely affected any more than would occur .f the development were located as specified in the "ode; and NOTICE OF DECISION CISION $l F 6-05 & V 18-05 Y•M PAGE; • k ', , , �,.„ .. .,.......,.,,, .,... .... .. ...,i,..:. i A..,,_.+Inrawrxi a.N r^.,r. Iu.wH. • 5. The hardship is not self-imposed and the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship, The request to devote 16% of the lot area to landscaping instead of the 25% area required by the Code appears to be justified for the following • reasons: 1, The primary intent of this l:andscpaping requirement is to ensure } an appropriate amount of buffering for surrounding uses. This is • particularly important when residences are adjacent to an I-P zone. . This property is adjacent to commercial and industrial. development and the existing landscaping on the site is of high quality. The existing landscaping along with the additional work that will be required as a't condition of Site Development Review will provide • adequate buffering for the surrounding properties, • 2 The previous P1-2 zone had ' no landscaping requirements and the C-P !, zone which followed requires that only 15% of the lot be landsc .p+ d, The existing building was constructed and future plans were based upon the provisions of the M-2 zone. The application of the 25% landscaping requirement essentially 1 .' prohibits, any meaningful 'expansion' of the printing operation, ; a The proposed use is consistent with code requirements and the reduction in landscaped area will not have an adverse effect upon i . physical or natural systems, 4 The hardship was imposed tht,ough the City's change in zoning requirements after the property was developed. The ;variance is the minimum necessary to allow for the required expansion of the facility. ti e proposed landscaping a, a s o consistent wi t ~ t he requirement for the adjoining C-P zone, (15% minimum) , • The landscaping chapter of the Community Development Code (18,100) I . requires that a 10 foot wide landscaped buffer be provided whore a �. development in the I-ra zone is adjacent to the C-P zone. The proposed 0 foot building setback'' on the southern property lire does not appear to meet the applicable criteria based upon the findings blow; 1. The purpose �f the landscaped buffer �s to provi de de s ne physical separation between different land use types: The proposed addition would be situated at the top of a hill with an undeveloped parcel zoned C-P lying below. T his building could be a rather imposing structure when viewed from below: Te 10 foot !' " setback and landscaping requirement will have a definite positive 1, visual impart ,and will help ma Main a compatible relationship between properties, 2.' The previous icus M-2 zone had a', 20 foot rear and side yard setback requirement, The C-v zone "ad 110 setback but the expansion would clot have been permitted because the publishing firm's non-conforming status in that Zrane r The i0-fort setback standard actually allows for a more efficient t t<<se of the eopel"ty � , than originally permitted under the M-2 zone. NOTICF., OF OI~.CISXOt - SDR 0-$5 & V U-$5 - PA E 8 . • ri • 3. The proposed use conforms with code requirements and impacts related to physical or natural systems is not relevant, 4, The applicant has not demonstrated that the setback variance is . the only feasible way to expand the operation, Since the original setback standards have been relaxed, the need for the variance appears'' to be self—imposed if the existing building is not in the ideal, location for constructing an addition, J DECISION • The Planning Director approves SOR 8-85 subject to the following conditions 1, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL CONDITIONS SHALL 111, Ml;.,1 PRIOR To 'ISSUANCE OF (WILDING PERMITS. 2 A revised site and landscaping plan shall, be submitted for plannifrig Director approval which contains the following items a, A minimum setback of 10 0 feet shall be provided alrrg the south aid west property lines b, Location, dimensions and planting materials for all ryew landscaped areas including the required buffer strip along the south and west property lines, Total landscaped area shall equal a minimum of 15% of the lot area 3, The method for handling stormwater drainage shall, be submitted to the tltftild .rig Inspector for approval, This approval 1 wl 4 i i l � 1 1 y It V! 4 i This , .pproval. is valid if exercised within OMQ year of the final i . decision date noted below, The i J i 4 J . ,y JJ Y 1" r "i he� �Planning Director trot � partially � approves � V :f.3��8ta subject t `t+<� the �following onditions; 1 J a:- M i is area the property 1 �4 f a 1, The total, landscaped a on, the proper ty shal,l. be a minimum of 15%, 2, The proposed addition shall Maintain a � a n � � rin setback of 10 feet from the south and west property lines. , 8, The approval is valid a f exercised within � y� year of the Ce c o a i o n '. date noted below, a , NOTICE or DECISION 5t)l 8-85 ,;, V 13-85 i PAGE ro ■ • N ,„ �„ D. PROCEDURE 1, Ir•,ta.se: Notice wars published ire the newspaper, pasted. ,at Cit►� ,', Hall and mailed to 1 X _ The applicant 6 owners ; X N,...._ Owners of record within the required distance t� X ,_ . The affected Neighborhood Planning Org nization f • k., ,�. X, Affected governmental agencies 1 2, Final C)ecis tci' 2 , .98 t i DECISION SHALL BE F I W ON JUTy tVN � �C �C ��� 18 r ILEG, 3. elappa.1 Amy party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 1832 %9O(A) and Section 1832.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the CITY RECORDER Rl h within 10 days after notice is given and sent, • The deadline for filing of an appeal is 4:80 P.M 1 1 4. 2.g9stiaosl If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 1275 SW Ash, PO Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 07228► 639-4171. i, _....--- 7 0-7 <7,,,...,), ..._ .._,_ i N•WI MMU+MJF•+.rrfw••r••NiJ,•M•J°"r .N•M.Nr».NIY4 w.••w•...••.•wu_N:""W"••i.r{,••.:Yw,w•1.•.NM.N.{WIW..:..r:{ww..•WiYN Wr.wMWhM•.••».N{NF.N.••••W ,_.iw.w•lr•N�uwS•M,,.�NN &,w••::i•uMw1NLMx4wwNrw.N 1 • W • liCf A. Monahan, Director of Community Development DATE APPROVED , , It......1 N. , ,,,„ , „: , ,,,,..._,„„..., , . as ..,.....X -1 1 ( ESI Fl 1... ,. 4_L-4.,...\ 4 - ' 1 \ \ ir: .ANt.uo; . et 1 1 1 IR snit° .--V- 1 - \ '41rti j ( SL:i627P) , . i . . • r T • l 1 Y • 1j P.O.BOX 370 PHONE''(603)634-0360 ' . NIOtic b BA1/ERTON,OREGON 97073 ii, � ," r • e 0 Tearsheet Notice = ,. 0 1S 5 Ci-t,y4 of Tigard , . �. �' P'0 Box 23397 • C0 Duplicate Affidavit n � -� Tigard,, _OR 97223. �� ?: AFE$DAV T OF PUBLICATION , W O t � ;� ,r' r,r „,';!,','";',1 a i tiiii CC3.r r STATE OF OREGON, .,� I �rC�,C3�� e� , , , COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, �s. , . . `—, � ' x •� ��,;�� �,� �,��,��,, ,;I���`, a alit' i' � r I o Jacque1�n Age _ +4 it)'''../, ` ', ; i : 1� . • being first duly sworn, depose and say titaf I am the Advertisirt '. 30” '�, A. t' ,4, 1'et,t, ', 0 ,, , Ti ard. Times .,r,; °0.a ,' �� ,, ,,,r o "'ar . � arectgr, or his principal cl�erbc, of the ,. , , , �' a news a or'of eneral ciroulatiOn as defined in ORS `193 t� 0 �` � +` `�a `� ""tI '�' �„Noir and .103,020;H published at T i g a r c. ...�ir the ',t �'"`}�' ', , ' ' ,r, ; a. , ``dJ� , ['R 'aforesaid county and state; that the „ w a � , ±�y . ` ;E a printed copy Of whioh is hereto annexed, v�aa puialisht,d ira the' Y '' ; i:' '' 'z � ,.4f 4' °'t 4' i - 11:V, ��(,:"0,���,o �„ t .a ; y c. o. ,, R� - 1�� � � 1 M r ry! .I 1 �r ,"`-T �.�or�t��i ���iJ 1 .a., ®ntirr� issue of said newspaper f©r, �. 1 ., succeesive arid` ,` , '�: ;� ,�+� ;� � �,k, ,�, �,, ,`, �.. '�` � �' '�consecutive in the following issues �' gal � p ' , i , �'' n yI/ � ' -- ,yam, July' ---_$' S Y 'fir, F, 1,, A 1 �i ,� 9 5 . " �; ' -� 'a, yTT'.�Q ,�. w� r I r' r 1 t �. '.�f��7t tW�I IIMMgl � �N�' +� �J , f W F,'N ' r ; t/; ff 1 .4.1,° �.l�i' � y1 i j 1 � t t' .� 3 ,r ” t I tl ' � y 1n �„ ' 1 u. f t �, „ J�.t 0� Etl 9 A ry t ii R A ',,ll �, t V y :'•„ F ` � � /� �� ,m, � ,,Air y '�". � w",1 ,IM� yl Y , p 1a ;i Jul i. r - w i � '`4)!' rl 'l' . 1 E tq I ubscri d a t..,before me this il',1,i$ '„,,..;1,,;:,,,. 111,40,,,,!,i09,41,4.4,1:14.4),g4r;0,1;:t,,,,,,,,,,,. „ , .. 1. ,„,„,,,,..,. , -.:,„,,-,,,_ .1,.. ,.a) .-„, ,,„,- ,-,,,' :” ,.:. . ,, i,,, , , . ; ,,..7... ,I, ,,„ , , , ,,,,,,,,r :$ ,,,L.40, , N op, lis, • Notary Publ- for Or,pgcn ;, 11,,,,,,,,:,,,,; My Come i a 9/20/88 ,` tA4,411iitt! �.. . � fix" gyres � r � � AFFIDAVIT- i' • I i I k , AID •Ir 5bi• , W �! 4(4 "clip ��, P.O. BOX 127 a TUALATIN, OREGON 97062 A PHONE 682-2601 • RP', E . PUBLICATIONS July *, 17a* 6760 S. W. Sandburg €.,+n. Tigard, OR 5'722 14220— 1 2541 —045-000 .Insp. Type RSW Sear Keith Liden, This letter" is to notify you that a Site Plan Review has , been conducted for R. F. D. Publications, Tigard in accordance with Uniform Fire Code Article 10 ter establish • •. required fire flow, hydrant location and street access for fire apparatus. No portion of the structure(s) shall be greater than 150 feet from a Fire Department access roadway. UFC 10, 207(c ) If an approved access road cannot be provided within 15 0 •f• feet of all portions of the structure, an approved auto- matic fire extinguishing system may be installed upon •r approval of the Fire Chief. UFC 10. 207(c ) Automatic Sprinkler P rotc'Gion will be required b fire "low , re uiremen.ts, building code requirements and. will satisfy the above requirement, Approval l submitted plans �s not approval of omissions ;. or oversights by this office e ar, of non—compliance with and applicable regulations •. Q'�� � �:�Os���� ��1`�F''�T"ntI't��'�. If you a conference regarding this plan review or if you have .questicne4 please feel free to contact tie at (50 3) 682-2601. Sincerely, A, /9/# Fire Prevention Bureau � ,Y ~~� 1�n IR)i JUL 11 1985 r 'CITY I PLANNING DEPT • I 1 REQUESTS FOR COMMENTS T°: '; ., DATE: June 29 l 85 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SDR 8-85 & V 13-85 Request by RFD Publications Inc. for Site Develo went Review & 'Variance approval to allow for a 14,840 s• . ft. bld:. addition & e provzsons o 0 o t e of area for landscaping instead of 25% and to 1 , eliminate a landscaped buffer as required by City Code on property zoned '� I-P (Indu. Park) Located: 6960 SW Sandburg St. (2S1 IDD lot 701) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statL :nt for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by July 12, _, 1985 You may use the space provided below` or attach a separate letter to return your comments, Ifouare +unable to res ondb the . above dare, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and :I confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, P.O. Bost 23397, Burnham and Ash Ave. ,' Tigard, OR 97223. Phone: 639-4171. . STAFF CONTACT: Keith Ljden PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We h a ve reviewed d tD e proposal sa l and d have no objections to it. Please contact of our offide. enclosed letter. . e 1 I Please refer t o the Written comments: Name of Person Commenting: � ph tia N 0 0 I n , 1 f • NOTIFICATION LIST FOR ALL APPLICATIONS 1. it NPO No. CPO No. � . • i 2. CITY E PARTME N TS • • ' Building Inspector Engineering-Randy EngineeringFrank/John , Parks and Recreation 3. SPECIAI,eDISTRICTS T ual a tin R F .P.D . • � � � Metzger W.D. Washington Co. F.D. No. 1 School Dist. No. 48 (Beaverton) � , Tigard W.U. School Dist. No. 23J (Tigard) 4. AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS City Council Wash.Co. Land Use & Trans.De t. Planning Commission Boundary, Commission Planning Department METRO 5. STATE AGENCIES Aeronautics Div. (ODOT), -- - ( DOGAMI a 'Engineer _ � Division of State Iran d s Board of Health Commerce Dept. - M.H. Park Highway Div. - Terry Flink Fish V Parks & Recrea. Div. (ODOT) LCDC Subdivision Supervisor PUC Dept. g � � � �� � � � � � � � Eire Marshal. Dept. of Environ. Quality ,Other 6. FEDERAL, AGENCIES � � q Corps of Engineers Other Post. Office. 7. SPECIAL AGENCIES Genera l Telephone leP p hone Portland General Electric • . ... Pacific Northwest Se ll Other Northwest; Natural Gary TS FOR COMMENT SENT (I SL pm/o3a6P) • . ' . . , , . . , REQUESTS FOR COMMENTS , TO: /.4/1_,4, .__. DATE: IpL....Le....22„..120___ FROM: Tigard Planningd(partment . ' . RE: SDR 8-85 & V 13-85 Request by RFD Publications Inc. for_ILLq....2tmlopment__ ReView & Variance approval to allow for a 14,840 s . ft. 12.1.4 ....addi......ti.arl &! le provisions o ... o t e ot area for landscaping inFitead of 25% and to eliminate a landscaped buffer as required by City CodeLl....21.10211yamed_ I-P (Indu. Park) Located: 6960 SW Sandburg St. (2S1 1DD lot 701) Attached is the Site Plen and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a ,report and recommendation will be ' prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by July 12. , 1985 ,..... You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. you are unable to_utiportd..ily the ......----- above datet please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and ) confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, cohtact the Tigard Planning Department, P.O. Box 23397, Burnham and Ash Ave. , Tigard, OR 97223. Phone: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Keith Liden 1 t ' PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. o Please contact f our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments: t, - -•e.../.- c.=41.-- - e44,e)re_toe... „ . . ....--:i- - ' . . • ., 7. elik ■ ... 4. .„k \c,...),‘A..L. O kV,• ...... V\O • 'r"`O''■., ...... Lj....11, Vet.'LQ L ' , 'tali H . . Name of Person CommentIng: a i 1 1 ' Phone No (KSL: Pw/015611) , 1 , , . ii 1 1yt REQUESTS FOR COMMENTS 10: fLii,prDATE: June 22,_12115 FROM: Tigard Planning !,.epartment RE: Sbr 8-85 & V 13-85 Request by RFD Publications Inc. for Site Development Review & Variance approval to allow for a 14,840 sq. ft. bldg. _additon & � "die provisions o o o t e-T`t area for landscaping instead of ,25% and to eliminate a landscaped buffer as required by Cit Code on ro ert zoned Y Y p F Y 1_p (Indu. Park) Located: 6960 SW Sandbur!. St. (2S1 1DD lot 701) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be ;C prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by July 12 ....:.._, 1985 You may use the space provided below' or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If y►ou are un_ able to respond: ba the above data please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If .y^u have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, P.O. Box 23397, Burnham and Ash Ave. , Tigard, OR 97223. Phone: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Keith Liden , PLEASE CK T HE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT AT APPLY: We reviewed th o os l and have no objections to it. ' e. have revewe the proposal obj p a ,1 � • Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments: s ,._..�._......:. . t' Name of Person co !:o^ Phone No s „ O C,:pin/03560 • A . • ■ . , 4' CITYOF TIG , . - '', '` WASHINGTON CXYMTY,OREGON , SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION } CITY OF TIGARD 12755 '`SW Ash, PO Box 23397 ,. Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171 FOR STAFF .USE ONLY CASE NO. ... I RECEIPT NO. / ,_ APPLICATION •CCEP ED BY: DATE: �:`./( 61(4 '" .:" 4� L . 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Application elements submitted: PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION (, '12LQ___` (M /(A) Application form (1) 6,,; ,p ox- ,' �'a ` , 6 11,■,,,.ipo 2§ , /(B) Owner's signature/written L , TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO. 2 -,)717 I _ authorization 1:12::" _ � /(C) Title transfer instrument (1) . SITE SIZE .-,`S L D) Assessor's map (1) n HOLDER* 4F / "�".w pia �,.M;C- �W „ PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER .--" , E) Plot plan (5 copies) ADDRESS 049 sx • f P1i.NE 6) Applicant's statement CITY -u'omeo op ZIP _1.2?.) ,3 (5 copies) APPLICANT* 41 Lie 11.°4-5.- h x) List of property owner's xis'w,- lr°, r.,� ADDRESS �y '';- , 1 �5 PRONE &24)-4t zi within 100 feet (1) CITY 1. � � 4'' ) g ��t��� �`_..,,�,� '� ZIP . "�- I�. Filing fee , '' . • *When the owner and the applicant are different record ,� al.1. the applicant nontwithtwritten purchaser a authorization DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE: peo� or a l.easee in possession from the owner or an agent of the owner with written authorization. The owner(s) must FINAL TON DEAD . a�itho sign this application in the space provided on page two o FINAL DECIS,. LINE: submit a written authorization lip '-'horization with 11 thl;s application. /ZONE DESIGNATION:. COMP. PT A�� ESIGNATIO 1 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY The owners' of record of the subject property request site development review approval to N.P.O. Nu ( � q p Ppiber allow. Approval Date:,. Final 1 �. . a 1 Date: {k' �P l anni ng � LI . l , ....- engineering I�� ei," /i a —' • V. • . i I , 5 r I 4. : List any variance, 'condit,ional use', sensitive, lands, or other .land 'use H actions �. to ,be' considered as part of this application: .2A / L �?: ' .. • „ :, 1:: ' t-,44\11112:4,___, 214.e0 . .‘I'ML._.Z4c.,'___ii), P',/pPeS , ,g'e.1,10' , , :. ', ::: • :' „ ' ': ':'•H' :' ' '' ;' :' • ' S* Applic;ants To have �a complete application ,you will .need'`to submit attachments t ' described in tie attached information sheet at the time, you submit this . application. . ' 6. THE APPLICANTS) SHALL. CERTIFY THAT: „ ' F ` A. he above re•uest does not 'Violate any dced.,, ..restrictions that may be "''� ' ' . attached to or i.inposed 'upon .the 'subject• property., ,' E. If the application: is granted,' the applicant- will exercise ' the' rights " Iyi . ';granted in accordance: with the terms and''subject' to all the 'conditions and 'r ' ' limitations of the• approval. ' I �' G. All ..,,of the above statements and the statements in the plotH plan,,, , attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, area true.; and the: ' • -_, :applicants se, acknowledge that any permit issued, based, on this , application' may be revoked. if it is found-,that any such statements area ' ' falser i D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the 'application, ' including .the policies and 'criteria, and understands the requirements for approving: I � or denying the'application,. 'I 'DATED this day of . . 19 ' SIGNATURES 'of, each :owner (eg. husband and wife) of the' Subject', property4. I ., ,,, � ro .L ., �6 y.. ' ' . „ ' , ''''..... ',„,,,,,,e,-4 . :,,:. ..4?-110-, ....-% .:,:;;L' ilZ.,,:_.:_LL, : ,, '. :,. . t P '0 S1.,«pm/6$ 4P), • • I AMENDMENT T0: NARRATIVE IN SUPPORT OF A PROPOSED VARIANCE RFD PUBLICATIONS Prepared by Mackenzie/Saito & Associates, P.C. 0690 S.W. Bancroft Street Portland, Oregon 97201 June 17, 1985 1 i t I. INTRODUCTION: The following variances are an amendment to the original variance request, submitted 5-9-85, which requested a reduction of the total landscape area provided at the RFD . , Publications site on Sandburg Road. The new variance proposals will be presented in two parts• F' 1) RFD Publications proposes to reduce the total percentage of landscape area 'f from 25% to 16% 2) And eliminate a portion on of the required q buffer area along the southern property boundary. p w This revision to the ' original variance request results from RFD Publication' s re- evaluation of the facility design, with respect to improved function of the proposed expanded parking, off-street loading, and building area These variances are required , for the expansion of the existing facility, as originally envisioned during initial site development, and will permit RFD Publications continual use of the site. The original variance requesting a reduction of the landscape area from 25%, required , by the I-P District, to approximately 22%; The current plan reduces the landscape 1` area to approximately 16%. ' Historically, the RFD Publications site was zoned I-L which required 15% of the total site area to be in landscaping. This proposal fulfills i City recently 1 • that requirement. ' However, the Ci y tiy recognized that the RFD Publications site use, and adjacent site uses were not consistent with the C-P District (appl ed r with the Comprehensive Plan adaptation), so the area was re-zoned to I-P. Although this change allows the use of the site, it now does not allow the planned site development without reducing the landscape area to 16%. The second proposed variance 'i is to reduce the buffer area. This is required because g be extended the ,,ro property line,the, building needs to d to p py 1 ' in order to provide adequate space for locating new r r along n ����� � � for effects from printing neduc reducing machinery al g the proposed west building i di ng�wall . 9 press machin The adverse s g the size of the buffer area will be minimized due to.the topograhical differences between RFD Publications property and the southern I (e ,l scent site.t:e. From S.W. 72nd Avenue, minimizing�mi z�n and ary, the adjacent property I a RFD �Publications southern o continuousl,�� down to � 9 ;the need for a buffer in this area. �� •, II VARIANCE CRITERIA A. Reduction in the landscape area (%) . The follow"ng Will review t he proposed variance with respect to the criteria of Section 18.134.050► �» 1)~..detrimental to the code and plan. .. will h n' .. n �• , in landscape„ area , . _ _, �� adverse on the zoning operceivable adve ffect o� rse e reduction r � The � ,area 11 ave d : y vicinity. ade uatel adequately meet site plan has provided "a level of landscape area which will or local q y meet the intent of the Code and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. This is accomplished b�posioeen g the in concentr ated ar eas, where it will be the most v isible temp 1oys, vi s itors, and motorists on Sandburg Ro a d: uu,.,a,r«.,"xv_ {w«.,.»a„,•.w4,u,.,,,u.', .», .ii, ,, .., n,,e,rv„ru,y»+.wu,u.a,»m- ,ar,”„ u,.r,..+.a.w..,..,pa.l,.,.,+ _.,.,," .'tl1l w'IIN A 1111,'T •YY „i. ,..."..... ... .......... .. ., x..,,u.n . ,A 1 , .I I Vim. 2) , ..speci al circumstances. .. The special circumstances applicable to this site is the change in the zoning district from C P to I-P; thus requiring a greater portion of the total site `area --try be in .. landscaping. Under the original I-L, zone, RFD Publications believed 't eir suture 0. I expansion need could be fulfilled at this site. If the zoning had remaine 11. this variance would not be necessary; however, the zoning district has recently been_c�hanged to. I-P, thereby leaving the site in a position to require a variance to complete the facility development, � 3) . ..use will be the same... The use of this site has been established and is allowed under the 1-P zOrie. For RFD Publications to continue the economic use of this site it has become necessary to reduce the landscape area from approximately 24,900 sq. ft. (25%) to approximately r . . 17,000 sq. ft. (16%) . By approving the variance requests it will facilitate the continued future use of this site by RFD Publications. 4) . . .physical s,ystemsv .. , The proposed site development, will have no adverse effect on traffic, drainage, existing natural land forms or parks. The comparable effect between 25% landscaping and the proposed 16% landscaping on these above mentioned physical and natural systems will be negligible.' , 5) .q.hardp shi , . i The hardship was imposed by the recent change in zoning of the site. Under the original Zoning District a variance would hot be required. However, for RFD � ors 1 ion Publications to continue, with their desire of long term use of the site, this s variance request is the minimum necessary to alleviate the hardship, B. Reductzon f the �6 o e ff er area. ; (''' 1) ..'.detrimental to the Code or Plan... � The purpose of the b uf fi e r requirement is i s to provide a s h p,aration between land uses . of different intensity. The adjacent site to the south is vacant and zoned 0=P„Although the buffer b e reduced on the subject p ro p er t y, there wil l st i l l be the p osiblit fo r a buffer to be established on the adjacent property when it develops. I Furthermore, he topographical difference� � _��� ,,between the two properties i es . ore, Terence bet t p p creates a visual effect Which minimizes the effect of locating RFD Publication' s south building wall adjacent to the property line. . rll E . mm-m,,.ter... ,. ..,..,.,. .... ... ...0 q, 'R • • , , • 21 . . .sped al circumstances. . . Under the past I- .''Zone, RFD Publications envisioned and planned for the site to accommodate the future expansion of the existing facility. The special circumstance relating to this site include fulfillment of the special requirements of the expanding production/warehouse building, employee/visitor parking, and the off street loading . areas. The off-street loading and employee/visitor parking areas requires` a total square footage which limits the production/warehouse area from expanding to the east. Placement of the new printing press along the west wall (the placement of the buildings west wall will be located to preserve the required buffer area) necessitates the south building wall to be extended to the property line, thus providing the work space needed for the printing press. Because of the lengthy dimensions °of the printing press t. the variance i s, requested to allow for the expansion of the existing facility ", as originally y planned. will be t a w the same. . . 3) . . .use h As stated previously, the use of this site has been established and is allowed under. . the 'I-P District. The I-P District requires a buffer area between it and a C-P use, and i n. thi s case, a buffering effect is created by the topography of the area will be utilized. T he elevation change produces a visual sual effect which mee iss th e intent of Code and City standards. The proposed reduction in the buffer' s horizontal area will have minimal influence upon the ability of"the buffer to serve its intended purpose. Furthermore, the variance request will enable RFD Publications to expand its facility and to continue with the commitment for long term use of the site• 4) ... hysi cal systems.. . "; The proposed var7 ance request to reduce the buffer area will have no adverse effect f f ec t on tra ff i s, d ra i n a ge, dramatic landfo rms or p arks, since these sy stems function independently of the buffer requirement. 5) .hardship. .. Because s iternal functions of the production/warehouse building and the size of the i n functi o onlw �' of the new printing press, RFD Publications found it necessary to locate the machine h west L machines the need to ex.., and the south wall The mach nThe prop p length tthis hardship.created t e along the we:�t wall . �ne g to the property line; and thereby causing' . proposed variance request is minimum variance to alleviate this hardship. 's the��min III CONCLUSION it � ., RED Publications dareful re-evaluation of th site facility expansion has indicated ' ° the need variances. The ' is the'. min7mum variances to continue the ed for these yeti� request• commitment of long term use of the site. These proposed variances will, allow the facility expansion as originally envisioned during RFD Publication's initial site development. h, - , R.F.D. PUBLISHING CO. PRELIMINARY PRO -CT SCHEDULE : 1985 APR MAY JUNE • r WEEK. OF 29 6 13 20 27 3 10 17 ::,6::;.@Mt .,1/■M■■1111 iIMM111111111sNi1111■ti11/11MI1111Aw■ PREPARE VARIANCE SUBMITTAL III SUBMIT/ACQUIRE VARIANCE ■ Li "e<s■ EE feel:, Wen: N anias�■ras ' DESIGN .11111111111 IIII anima , .P AR. , el,rs.sllilaiiiiim s�tsseasamit PREPARE DESIG RE EW D VI OCUMENTS , 1111111111111,1111111 11 1.,011 i�eoMrll usayamIM ssimarrans m�I ss *r CLIENT REVIEW`COORDINAT / I ION SUBMIT/ACQUIRE'DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL ■w.�.11•li EN' ■ n;<, . ����' PREPARE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS ell111°l1111e11r:e.sssrelall a x413 <111 118 395-M. SUBMIT/ACQUIRE BUILDING PERMIT ■■ ■s�esgrsilill eemsllllasu alllelislMsssrlr1111 t Q PIIR Irlris'ies:.�snasrless,�lilrs» s.wrr,�w•es.RireeslI*I ' - ELIMINARY CONTRACTOR PRICING FINAL CONTRACTOR PRICING ss.Ill111111 I111I1M1,irssnlies,■ies14111rIrs111111 11111.1111 ". OWNER REVIEW/AWARD CONTRACT .11111■I11.e.1111111sses11esl1sr111111 l i ialuarese RI IIIII START CONSTRUCTION ■ai*$a■im iuM sus!II.UUemisUeo*UseeiUias*Pa$*. III OR PI IIII SII ssllisnorsil*MIP s■ sUUrUIIR$ s�r s imm, " mwommm.. Illis :*l ' ISSUE FOR E7 e - sss--- nasss w i:.. i.M... OWNER REVIEW/AWARD/CONTRACT�AWARDrCONTR ACT 1111411111111111411111111 slfiMil1sMlsi*lislli, s 111111111111.11111111111111111.11111111111111.111111111111.111111 ,i, START CONSTRUCTION TION ess�e.e,s�lws�l�l• it �Isees alrrsn. s®ass®nn afill a ssalm11 #rlls,0 mom msssimm'1 immi ss ENII_s X!M lImil .IMINMINllll®ss M!*I I�IIMP r 11411111®011MNIIiII®I®II® IM Emn . MIPposH ■I , , I JULY UGU� , 0 24 , 1 ' 8 ' .5 '22 29' 5' 12 . ir 9 26 :2 ' 9. 116 ' ' .23 30 7 . 1 :11111111 .� �� mil, ' . ulrs�simi' rasrls'a an srsrsalaleee asmanalell asrr.allliallaaaaalsaaaa aalas'eaalaa a ■/laleee4/taal7■ ■asst i as*asi■aa *■aa.Salla*l■!lass* i*RM■>11a'II iUas:lell,OntIUla■ir1■aaeaaaaiaelaaa s:ustialtaa• ■NI■easaa , . s.ilreasiriplligta.li*alsasaa. sirras.a :at ia■AiIIIaaiaiariaaaasaasl>gn ,a•*u•a a,Ailaaaa:ara i ' . N MI , ' ) aaaelisa'sai.ell•i ,aalaa me• ■ millipsialr lope llialsitaiNSe>i, lle hail r ' ■ssrs 111 .■ :Irtr'IIU$r$sI*Iaa,., iI*i*eiliasssi*. "sssatasa.assiasse.aia*aalilaaiu usaeaspalsseaseselelel alaaaiia •sslssr1Ms■ easrirw N • , 1 , . ,,h, . Beau' trca im 2., 11121 s1el1ra11111111>1i101ISilli r■ ante!!•will isililir 101i1t . sellNnamle>rrmit11* a ee ,l sl l )Daw,iell/l�.Ns�■ 'swiss*ulihas*Nas.:1as .,r,a, .*a•iliniam1u Ii. :a/Na, .•11amWaalaaut I ':'i as•arlali PI" ansm aaaaa.a'ea a a.inaaaasa.aa.a,allena lasaullia !tin Naha sss:.raaa'saalaa . Manna'salia Kalitgi,- a1111, .l>hliallla 11,111 tisellsella>rr/d l>>1' ,essl/-■aal>iliil,/elar1111 a ■aa:aeeli/e»le+■/s/ral> ' , up I a ma >,el>lar/eiraa I , !1 'l '.'/el0",..al *ail u me" IIs.1r'II�aa*Jal> s* u u m leach amis:Uaa1 ,1 , 1 1 . ' j'' ilia a■seaalailiRa.ills■ a 1 AV. l,l lael •ss ::i:: ::::.:::::::j::j.:a' 1 i 1sr si:saaar 1-0 j:!I ::::u*:. .a.a � . isra*M- $raalarll ,, »ws�� ll�el III>r�u nnl1l, 1rl,,I l Ial ll;Il .leilil., . ra�s>At�ia»rr��ara�'w�� 1 �»�r1ia�ai�.ras�s��ua .. MO. I : 'liaaalarw ■ar issimaUAI$aaUNsimpa'aa.a tlrl l i 'tl.11 ,.>tM *ar61•01/raa*Arl1 ■r■aruara;/al/aaa'11'N aa t s�11Mr>l1M tillilallla mesa .all! ra.asa 1014,1,l'Ma• ���ifs�eaa�a���rs■ ��� �leln �� ;l ul. ��'�ww�r>.srarr ..�WE.. �r �®w���eaa�r,„ i . , , , , �5 ladeasaaaaalaars�llll�,t s'aa Ala_1 111papimaani..■N �a1101 .11i• 011111 IAMI11■ 11111/101111111.11111111. shwa sawadlsalimala . sia .araeaaaaasall ■as. alseeellas sal/a,A11la1aMiiar l'aMl 1 aair allay lilliAild.Nllsa.ss,llMlaKltrla :1„ . ,,,, . , I>l ma r; a trrrsiaaielllir II ii1lrw al�Ira11 �., A,�a�lss�i�aN1 � IMrIl:1111111Mlrlir 111tlll.a1 0Rr1IlIr.Ml0llltrlals!®rMSl1■ .II Maii, rmailirrpriir rrw rrra . mask rllr .orr.ra Il®orlsrirArailrr,rrarlM . ' 1 i , , ..-,:...•..._.-..,,.c.rd .,,.1'r,.,..,,,,',._--.....µ.'....x,. .. r_.....'.;«.._..,. ....,, .r_r,,.,'.,...A,....,.,..,r,.- .e,..,„ ,,.r..._, ..... ,...,,..1,.,,, .,. ..,.,..4...,,,, .r.,... ,,..,. ,.• i , 't J.-.. .t. :l 'I i ..,r ,.I, ,..,.,.•,.....x rr.Jhlw i , E . MACKENZIEk...ITO &ASSOCIATES, P.C., OREGOk.. • MACKENZIE/SAITO&ASSOCIATES, P.S.,WASHINGTON ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS 0690 SW BANCROFT STREET PORTLAND, OREGON 97201 (503) 224-9570 � May 20, 1985 City of Tigard Attention: Keith Liden Planning Department City Hall Tigard, Oregon 97223 • it Dear Keith: (' Please find attached our submittal for Site Development Review for RFD Publications Company. The Site Development Review °package" includes application elements required by the Tigard Development Code. As you know, many of these items were submitted for the Administrative Variance. The proposed project will include addi ti on of 14,$40 sq. ft. of manufacturing/storage area, to the existing 22,970 sq. ft. RFD Facility. The proposed facility will meet the requirements of the zone, with exception of the total landscaping requi rement. An Administrative Variance has been requested, as noted above. We have reviewed they Tigard Development Code, and believe the proposed facility will be compatible with the surrounding environment and nearby uses. The sit plan indicates proposed 1. access/circulation and parking, in addition to site coverage data, exterior lighting and construction phasing. I hope this information will be helpful to you in your review of the RFD project. If I can be of further assistance, please let me know. Sincerely, Robert K.busrei ter, Architect RK/cb I' Enclosure +. o o • �. • . • • CIWOFTIGARD WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE APPLICATION 2. CITY OF TIGARD, 12755 SW Ash, P 0 Box 23397 � � Tigard, Oregon 97223 -: (503) 639-4171 FOR. STAFF USE ONLY . p CAS E NO. • r• RECEIPT NO. 1 \. APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY '' 01., DATE: 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Application elements submitted: •. PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION kei 42py.i !A E,C2 _j/(A) Application form (1) �. gerti.R.t7 ate- (B) Owner's signature/written TAX MAP AND TAX LOT. NO. irk authorization L 7" 10 40' (C) Title transfer instrument (1) SITE SIZE , (D 'Assessor s map (1) , F1 :.3:7171. � �, 4'o+' PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER �-'(E) Plot plan (5 copies) . ADDRESS 4 , 7 �; IC�w,, . -�;,► 'HONE ' . '� (F) Applicant's statement 1 . CITY r1,4, +•1 «i ZIP et"?t" (5 copies) APPLICANT* 4O ',,,.•= a (G) Lis,,t of property owner, s ADDRESS -� .s " , Jet: tZ, Fri PHONE ?pee°44 tel within 100 feet (1) CITY ,� - ZIP 7 (H) Filing fee ($200) *When the owner and the applicant are different ' people, the applicant purchaser re • or a leasee in possession with written authorization DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE: • P owner with,written � p .Lzation from the�� owner oar`�A agent of the�o�a .� authorization. The r . orn e r(s) musts±gn this application in the space proy3d e d on page two„ or FINAL D C.xs x N DEADLINE: NE: . submit a l wr itten ant hor ization with this application. COMP. PLAN/ZONE DESIGNATION: . 2« PROPOSAL SUMMARY The owners . p o i record of the subject ec p p er LY reques t permission for a Var i a nc e to the _N_n �P.O Number:following provision(s) of th e Community Deil'elopment Code. Approval Date: Final Approval of Conditions: rdV a .-7 —a Planning Engineering • y . . • r ,, . 4. '.List an � di onal :use' site develoment review or ' other, land use actions of Y cond t i' p review, H, be considered as part of this application: • '',/' r 2 e .?op44 (J1' I 'S. . lic�nts, o A� To havea c m lute a � lication ou''will need� to submit c atta hments AP � P � .Pp � Y �., . '' ,described in the attached information sheet at the time;.'you submit this . application. 3 6. THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT': . ,'' ' , . A. The bo ave request does not violate any deed restridtioptH that may be . attached to or imposed upon thesubjecroperty. c ' ' B. If the application is granted, the applicant will ' exercise, the `right : s , granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and 'l l ittons of the' 'approvals C., All of the above : statements and the statements' it the' •'plot plan, ` attachm,ent,s, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and,: the } applicants so acknowledge that any permit . issued, ,' based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are , +'' : - false. 0.. the applicant has read the entire contents' of the application, including ' the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. TED this . day' of 19 f the subject 'property* "IONAT'[�TkES of each �outer (eg� husband and 'rife) o � ,� 'ct l . •iik' -1•/— .,(7 : : 1 A ' S ,.pin 0521 ) ,S ' rTW'.. „ n m,.i . 'r, 1 .m. n J. A.. , 1 ...I..rn ... . ., r r it ✓ t 1 � �/ ' r• :^ ...., .,.r. ,. 'vnvi u.',rr r. ... ....... .. .. ..,, n. .. _ .r... ... .,.,, .. rw .: r r 4 • • . . ,.., ..„., , ir • ., . . . - - . . „ . . . , . , . . • . , , , ' ' .., • . '' d • • , , . , I , , , . , ,,, ,. , ' , . . , . . , ...•...., ' ' L. , . ' , • , , . , '' I , FORM N., 964—Stevens,t4ess Ictw PublIthino Co,,,., vid, Ore, 97204 ' ' • ' ----- ------ --------------', . f AN " , ' . i I. ., WARRANTY DEED—STATUTORY rx)Rm . . 810201 rt. 1, An, U 1 fe , . . , CORPOHAT E COTARTOR . , EARLY CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIES INC. ' . . , „ . , a corporation duly .organized and existing under the laws of the State of California Grantor, ' conveys and warrants to RFD PUBLICATIONS, INC. , an Oregon corporat4.on, , . - Grantee, the following described real property free of encumbrances, except as . ' specifically set forth herein situated in Washington - , ,County, Oregon, to-wit: . . , . , A portion in Block: 4, in the duly recorded plat' of 'Salem Freeway Subdivision i'. ,. situated in the Southeast one-quarter' of Section 1, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon, ,more 'particu- , , . . ' larly described as follows:, Commencing at the most Northwesterly corner oft said Block 4; thence South '88 '5300" East along the North line thereof, :a I ' v distance of '4,10.00' feet to an angle corner in said North line; South' • . 2°33' 00" West, a distance of60. 00 feet to an angle corner in said North ' ' line and the point Of,, beginning of the tact herein to be described, thence - ' . South 88,°53100" East, a distance of 196 64 ' feetrto a point in the Southerly (IF SPACE INSUFFICIENT, CONTINUE DESCRIPTION ON REVERSE SIDE) ., The said property is free from all encumbrances except ., , , , .,, tcont inued on reverse) ., •• ., .. SUBJECT TO statutory powers of Unified Sewerage Agency. .' . ' . , . . ' The true'consideration for this conVeyanceis $1,1.1.5. -.0.00- G.Crifere comply with the requirements of ORS 93.030) 1), f , .4 11 , , •i•••.......A.,.L.i.........1.. r , , ' 4 l 46", ' O..* • , ■ . , ' ' .<, 4 '4 ' .14 ' .1...1 ' ' ',1.44•1 r‘1 Done by order O f the.grantor's board of directors with ifs corporate seal affixed on.....,...kay„:13. ' , ,11,19..c.A, ' , . .. . EA 1t .CALIFORN.,1A INDUSTRI ,S_IN.C, . . . , . • , , . ".. ,c. , .(209 t.) Intl. ,tt....v , , - . (ettliPORATE SEAL) ' - :, , ' ' ' ' BY ---- - ...-.....'...............,...--...v ",t-' . ..s.,..._President ' , , , .,- ,,,. By Sectetry .../1..... d.-..13.,;-:',,-;,-..,er ' ...),e-' , , • , , I , , • ' STAtE calafornia.,OF19?.;.v.15a4Q2i Cotrnil'.of T.:10$',Angeles„ .„., )ss, . ,........May-,13. 1 , 19A1,,.. Personally dppeared ...... D• mPbY„.„.,............,......,...„ aid .,Po..50111,a 5.,..... . ., . ..............:..„..„„ , : tehoieOch being first duly sWcItti, did ay that The lothier is the..... .,..-,.........„..,'......................„.,,....presideht and that he'latter is the • „ 1 , -.,,„.........:..........--„;,..-;,,...„..._...—..st,cretai-yot ."4?.4.J.Y CaI.14Ptnia:IPcluqttiPs... IPQ.H, - ' '.. ,,..-....4.--..-' , ..,t,..,,i,,,,,.,..;,L.,._,..„..,._.,. ,, ,,, ,,a.Corporkiiiblio..ind (hat the seal ir loiiktId.to tit?'Iotegoitid inttriiment ' is the carpe ie tsp/:,q1: said cbcptsrpition and Iliafstard-Tsrrument Was trdnect and sealed in behalf of said corporahop by,,taithorzty of Ls .1 . ' boatd of dir c /scitizs,ileeb..04 qee.,ti .11641;tot;llid41.141, said unStrunserif kp be liS ViJILMO.".` act and .!ed. ,....-'. 4 ....L., , fi ; ., , , r .. .V..."...ti:t. I, / '.•‘ '' " t =f." My (fowl, tvit'05 MAY 7,1 lt/S4 . o," Phitaty PLtbiio it1H4i My, Coniriatsicin pireSt,...,.'...,. i'.A — „ , . . (,'..'43 ltornla . . , ( WriltRANTY VECD , ' , . , 4,44,.VAX.IY.-.z:. C. ' SrAT,8 OP OPEOON,, , ' . GRAtoort ts, 1 s'."R.1%."4.D Palcajorls. int;'.. GhANTt * ' ' ' Coutity of ........,..,.„....,..,.,„1,'“,......,.." ,. , , I certify that the within ittSitt.i, '......, _______" . r1 .............. F;. ' .....HY7 1 `. '' , , ' ' , , ,, :vent 'tVitt reCeiVed for t6t,tr)rd on flie Alio rocotdInti tottoti tot . ' ' . , , , , ' RiChatd',,ro :010k0Y-44,.."...,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,..,.. .: o'cHtkootek Al Eine' toeorded „,„„, bom,,,,t'ktindivioi, , ,Itideli.i.41...414- — -.—-- ir4,1y, ii ......, ■ I G 6 Q $ 11,,,',...8arabUrg „ROad iA. bo ok/reelIvo/trine No„, , • ' , 1 ta q-1 i(.,1.. Orogon, 97223 ' , .......'... ... Atige... ..—„_.,..„.tir Its document/lee/We/ ,, c ',. i..,.. „ . - ,,„,-;,„.....,-,-.„,. , wircoiiiiiiivs u 1 higittithieht/tradtbiiiiii No, - „, ..,..,..„.,, • „ i ", it;biii'bi.i.;7'ir"."' T ', ' ' ', ,1 ' Pecord tit beedg of mid cotitity'., . , 01,100 thiintgil ti fo4tliiiiido Olt tax ililthi°88 ttlY hind inid .4."1 °I itiall be Ohl to ilii tOilOW160 titttliitti ' ' ' ,. ; ,' ' , . 1 COutity diixod, ..Rlha1. otc.- F.,,,..Da,,ckoy,.....„,„,............4,-..i,-„..... . i , ; ,Agr 60,:5 a .w, .,18ttridbu to Oreigob 5 7,.i.23,..,?.....----.:-.4 i4.1,114/i11,10.1,1411,,,,,14 ..,,„,,.•",,,..,,boptily ,, } NAá.Ut ztr f , . , • ' ,.,,,:, ,,,..,.........-......,.......:,...,....tt.-4,,,,„...--.--,.....,..-..z..,ti.......,-44....„ ,-,,,,.....:-......,r,,,-.-.,4,=-.:....---............7--- -----....... ..--,---.,..-....-.....,.....,,..L,:.....•••--.:.,-..i.,-.-..z.t...-t..-r..-4_,........,....t.=•..t.....t..........,- ' ---4.-----..:.=:-....,... ..7..,;.1.t.,,-.....,,,,,I...t.. ...' , , ( * : • " , , . ,, , • ` . , ., , , , : , . - . • • I 1 , � �.;., �... .-:.... ..v.. ..........»..' .....� .re......,. L' ,J, a , , r..s« -sd . . r ,,,..., k,,H. .r.�.... . . ,+r� 1,.14 w........r a.A,... r .r .�.« .». .Q,. t u -i ' extension of the West line of Sandburg Street; thence North' 2°33' 20" East along said Southerly extension, a distance of 22. 18 feet to a point of curvature; thence along the- arc of a 75. 00 foot radius curve to the left, ' through a central -angle of 91°20' 20: , an arc distance. `of 119. 56 feet (the chord bears 43°06' 50" East 107. 30 feet) to a point of tangency in . the South line of said Sandburg Street; thence South 88°47' 00" East along . said South line, a. distance of 90. 82 feet to a point; thence South 5°21' 15" • East leaving said South line, a distance of 238. 76 feet to an angle corner in the Southerly line of said Block 4; thence North 87°07 ' 30" West a distance of 396.96 feet to a point that bears South 2°33' 00" West 280.00 feet from the point of beginning; thence North 2°33' 00" East a distance of I 280.00 feet to the point of beginning. f . I , qr 1. , .. • • •, • • t, i • . '1 1, STATE OF OREGON ,� _ F Washington I or7 Cbtrnf a� I I, Roget Thomss©n, Director of Records . j Elections ors and said cEk Ofticio(Recorder of Con, vo ence i erot.y curtity tt�irt V do` the within instrument of writing was received 1,'/ ' ,/ end recorded in book of records of gird dbtttity I ROGER TMOMS& 51EN, Giirertu at • 1 . es/ tb� � horde Elect n • . I I I I I „ ( u , . ^ , UL Adjacent Property Owners f 0 Tax Lot Property Owners ; . Lot #700 First State Bank of Oregon (Pacific Western Bank)1211 S.W. 5th, Portland, g w Ore on Lot #900 Tarkianen, Reiono J.A. & Marilyn J. 9475 S.W. Oak, Portland, Oregon Lot #800 T & W Equipment Company � , �� 5000 S.F. 25th, Portland, Oregon = - �— Lot #702 Profit Sharing Plan an of Ralph Leber Go. , Inc. .. Leber � Ink Inc. 6900 S.W. Sandburg Road, Tigard, Oregon Lot #401 Ochoa, Holly / Haworth, Lori B. I Byers, A1exa,.aa1e f . . 5600 S.W. Willard, Portland, Oregon Lot #300 B.L. Larson Investments !- ` 9525 Commerce Circle, Wilsonville, Oregon CI f (::) Lot #3801 Pacific Western Bank a. r 1211 S.W. 5th, Portland, Oregon .; • Lot #3800 Associated Computer Services Inc. 13700 S.W. 72nd Avenue, Portland, Oregon Lot #3900 Pacific Western Rank 1211 S.W: • . 5th, Portland, Oregon Lot #4100 Pacific Western Bank (' 1211 S.W. 5th, Portland, Oregon botiC)rMI l'it4fs9'f:) MI(1,0') 1141 S /I/4)V *7.1P Ira" Rr- ' 41k0 4,4 Aoto 1(4(29(11