SDR4-85 POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
,
I 1µn•!}}}}}} ' �' ' A n _• �
F
11 J tr :i: ` �� W7`F�l'Ii°i�l �;ty ItI�IPr Yl;;,.y1 �� I,y'. 1 �a t'' �, ?F ,
a
C\I
It ,� It Y ,4 a
- a_._..
y�j4
+„r.,-41,,;.:r'irsyw..44;it a+im,.,,a.3,,,;• .mw•,,.,,,,,-.,»;x.,..i+.•n•rH,J•t*4*..,r.a;w,.,„1r•••,4'1(04a.^-M1.t».*,nvl,•1 MMe.n,,.l.;at`, ''•
_IS. ..,,,,.,..w-.L,.4:,.., ..._.n.u«.:. .r,...l:...14:'''.�:M.�:i+.'.4... ..—,...t,..-4's.,,,.. .r...•,r.,.1....., .. •........w_.-a'.,.......,.. .4,..1„„,.,,,e.M_.,,,,,........•,�.,i:;M... r..... r,.J..?:.4..1W.x.1,„,i,;1:,+,::t;.....«.,.......,,....«.,:.XU✓s-.,.4,.,,,,..+t,.:f:..»,r.........«.......,..t:«.,:,.,....n.r..,�,,,..«t ,•L,ti4,4•:41 , r'r.
Y
r '
i h
, , /
•
•
' ' \,
h f
1
I
is
.
. ,
y
{
^
.
t
I
;
,
I 1
..., .w,,. •..,r.„ ."r .,,..•...,r, .r...v x,.w,...,..,rN.n .,..r. „ .,. ,.v ., .. ......1,..._ . ..,, 1,. ,.,�,,,,., .,.•, .,, .., .. v.r..,.,,. .. ,.,..n,... .n,.,...n. ...... .... ..... ..... .. .. .„ `I
h1
SDR FILE CONTENTS
8 D R 44*-Str
WEIR ALSO If fb►
LEFT S 6F ... RIGHT SI F
P dperty Owner list hiss Visor Map/Maps/Preliminary Plat
May be attached in envelope)
Agency/NPO Request for comments Legal Description/Deed
1/ A fidavit of Publication/Ti" Letter of Authorization
'cation /Narrativ /correspondere with Applicant
Affidavit of Mailing & Posting Public Input
With copy of mailing labels
Notice of Final Decision ds'!agency/NPO Comments
I
Correspondence after approval.
APPEALED TO PLANNING COMMISSION r.
Date
PC Minutes
FORWARD/CALLED ED UP TO 'CITY COUNCIL
Date
CC Minutes
Resolution or Ordinance NO.
SUMMARY ;, `
ry 7/ i
en l
h'
y
�� ved
11 Date /yr ',({y,�jd'. jWy+,
No. of Phases ._41. Size of Lot a Gross Square Footage ,' e
2)
LC\041,e1/4(''.
special setbacks ,
).
Ives a(en i.�.a
commercial
.�. .
Ihdustrial .. '
ILL/djr(O616P)R/4/87
•
r
•
" I
1
•
, . R "' --- S
, .
AN'ELDAV17 OF MALLLNC I "
STATE OF OREGON ) fi
County of Washington ) ss.
City of Tigard )
1, Beverly J. Straub being t irst duly sworn, on oath 'depose r
and sa Y• (Please Print)
That 1 am a Office Assistant 1 for I"
The City of Tigard, Oregon.
That I served notice of Final Decision
for Planning Director
of which the attached is a copy (Marked Exhibit A) upon each, of the following
named persons on the 7th day of 1985 , by mailing to ;•
each of them at the address shown on the attached list (Marked Exhibit 8) , t'
notice as hereto attached, deposited in the United States. Mail on �'"
said noti
the 7th day of Ma;_ , 198 " , postage prepaid.
- °
ignature 1, , ,,,,.„„ ,.
, Person who deli red to POST OFFICE
Subscribed and sworn to before me on the ��` day of i 1985- �, •
dJ - 5C '
•
r ,
NOTARY PUBLIC OP OREGO N
N
• •, �l, 4 c?�
A '
♦ y. 41
W r
f5 G
` ' `- SC My "O cini s ic 1 Expires: C
(0257P) 1 I
■
•
I ,
•
•
•
•
•
CITY OF TIGARt)
•
NOTICE OF DECISION
SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 4-85
VARIANCE V 10-85
APPL.Ia. A'T'ION; Request by Andre and Linda Nadeau for Site Development Review
approval for a 1200 square foot building addition and new 7,200 square foot
building. A Variance is also requested to allow a 20 foot wide driveway where
24 feet is required and to allow less than 15% landscaping on the property
zoned X"L (Light Industrial) and located at 15785 SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 2S1
`.t2DC, T,L. 400)
DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of
Tigard has APPROVED the above described applications subject to certain
conditions, The findings and conclusions on which the Director based Ira.s
decision aro as :noted below.
Ail FINDING of FACT
1, Iackground
i"tte original,development of the property was approved in February,
2 Vicinity
Information
.
-.
The� surrounding c�rr �.rt' � t
N
id properties air
d tw i � The properties t,a,es
g la s, { ► to the
south, west, and east sid ► of 72nd Avenue are undeveloped, The
street 'frontage has been improved through the 72nd Avenue LID
except for 'a sidewalk.
3, Site Information and Proposa;i. Description
property
presently t� 4
» �1
1�kd ��1 with 2,816$�
a � L : � foot
t
building, a ' paved parking area in front and a gravel storage area
for automobiles in the area The existing building has 20 foot
side yard setbacks to the north and south,
(P. The applicant proposes to construct a 1200 square foot addition on
the northern side t . �� r ' s r«�f ���thy�' existing building. A 7,200 shop building '
is proposed fop, the western end of the property. This structure
will be built up to the property line on three sides,
variances are also requested with this application,rni F'irst,
the City standard for two—way driveways is 24 feet and the
,applicant 'is proposing a 20 foot drive. Second, the I—P zone
requires that th% of a project must be utilized for Iands(,aptng
and the proposed site plan indicates landscaped area cei the
property will be reduced from 9%► to 6%
NOTICE E of o c;,` arol SDR i 4-MS $ V 10-85 — p ►I:yt,N 1
4
'4, Agency and NPO Comment
•
The Engineering Division indicates that a sidewalk should be
provided along the 72nd Avenue frontage . according to City
requirements.
•
The Bui.],rli,nr+ Ti.ttspeGt.a.rain Office indicates that dote to the sa.xe,,
xl setbacks, and occupancy of the new, building,
Building Code
Requirements will be rather extensive, Also, some, accommodation
must be made for storm water drainage from the site
m NPO #5 'n icatF.ts that the landscaping variance could �set art
.
undesirable precedent of minimal landscap in g in industrial area,
No objection was expressed for the remainder of the proposal as '
long as the access arrangement is acceptable to the Tualatin Rural
' Fire Protection District,
r 8, ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION
Th ► proposal is consistent with the requirements of tine Community
Development Code related to the intended use, building height, setbacks,
and parking, The two major issues, associated with the case are the
variance requests, Secflon 19,184,050 of the Code contains the
following criteria that must be met in order to grant a variance
1, The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the
purposes of this Code, be in conflict with the policies of the
Comprehensive Plan, to any other applicable policies and
standards; and to other properties in the same zoning district or
vicinity;
2. Thee are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar tra
the lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over
which the applicant has no control, and whith are not applicable ,
to other properties in the same zoning district;
3 , The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this Code and
City standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is
I reasonable possible, while permitting Some economic use of the
land;,
4 Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited
traffic, drainage, dramatic. land forms or parks will riot be
adversely affected any more than i
han would occur f the development'
were located as specified in the Code and
5, The hardship 'is not self-imposed and the variance requested is the
minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship,
The variance request to permit a 20 foot wide, two-way driveway �� � r� ns�st� i
with the above criter ua for the following r easdns+
1,, The purpose Of the minimum driveway, width standard is primarily to
i ate access for erne
provide �ade+:yt,i'� � �r rgertcy vehicles, The fire district
standards call for a ,0 foot width,
NOTICE". C r~ of. 0rxX$;tON - ; DR ' 'w,85 & V 10-05 ��N p 1:
•
•
c r
•
1
•
2, The 24 foot width applies to parking areas that accommodate up to
100 vehicles. The site plan indicates that only 17 parking spaces
will be served by the 20 foot drive. Five parking spaces and a 24
foot wide drive near 72nd Avenue will accommodate most of the
customer traffic, Also, a portion of the existing building would
have to be removed in order to meet the 24 foot standard,
•
3. The use i$ permitted in the zone and the request is the minimum .
necessary to alleviate the hardship.
The variance to the landscaping requirement 1.s a more complex issue. It is
recognized that the circumstances relating to the existing building location,
parking, and the long and marrow lot configuration make it difficult to
provide landscaped area that will have a visual benefit: However, the
applicants' ro nosal to reduce the existing landscaped area to lot
proposal � �' >• .� 6% r.�f. the
size does not appear to be the minimum variance necessary to allow for the
economic development of the property,
The Cocks requires a landscaped area of 15% for industrial developments in the
X-L�' zone. The type of landscaping is primarily dependant' upon the preference
of the property owner except for the installation of street trees and trees
within parking lots at a ratio of ono tree per seven spaces,
A site obscuring fence will be retained along the 'north and south property
L lines for security reasons, The existing building and the crew structure irn •
the rear will block any viewing of the internal section of the property.
, 1 the Y \ 1 j4 1 V
Because of the present building and parking location, the only feasible area
to provide additional landscaping is to the rear of the existing show:
As stated earlier,
the landscaping proposed is not acceptable,
hr ,
we
ver, given
the following modifications, the variance would be consistent
with the
'! evaluation criteria noted above;
1. Revise the sit ► plan so that a minimum of 10% of the lot area is
landscaped.
2, Provision of two street trees�
along
72nd Avenue,
:
3. Provision of three trees as required for the 22 parking spaces,
i
{,
4. Provide a minimum of 9 additional trees along the perimeter of the
project, Th e trees should be
of a type that will be aesthetically
beneficial to, adjoining parcels a$ well as the subject property ,
The Planning staff concludes that the above changes are consistent with the
intent �r f the City's landscaping requirements to provide w,.
�� � � � p 'g � �, art aesthetically
pleasing environment 1 Since the proposal will be expected to meet N � f p � y� meet, all.
a�pl,a,casli standards for parking, access, etc. , it is possible the
construct tion plans May need to be reduced,
•
NOTICE E of` fDt-w
w
C. DECISION
The Planning. Director approves St)R 4w-85 and V 10.05 subject to the following
conditions:
1, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OP BUILDING PERMITS.
2, Standard half-street improvements, in this instance being a five
foot wide concrete sidewalk shall be installed adjacent to the
curb along the SW 72nd Avenue frontage, Said improvements along
SW 72nd Avenue shall be built to City standards and conform to the ,
alignment of existing adjacent improvements,
Five (5) sets of o • l a n—profile public improvement construction
.� a
plans "arrd one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by
a Registered ,Professional Civil Engineer, detailing all proposed
public improvements shall be submitted to the Engineering Section
for approval.
Y
4. Construction of proposed rprsed public improvements s
Iall
y r 1 commence
c�
,
until after the Engineering Section has issued approved public
improvement plans, The Section wi.11, require posting of a 100' `
Performance Bond and payment of a permit fee. Also, the execution ,
of a street opening permit shall occur prior to, or concurrently
6 '� h
with
t »,wt.w«hw.e w.w....«�:.+s s ...«.
He of approved
ovwwed•1.
public improvement r
oNvwwenelunt+u• u�ww
l•luaww n.uus Y SuEwwu»w.•
wu w•w.•uF w wM t•w•uwWE
ENCLOSED HANDOUT GI.VING M R pyEC F C H wN� R ATt«h REGARDwNG
r » ww .wu w ww f_w
SCHEDULES BONDING 5, Plans for proper drainage of the site shall be presented along
With the building plans for approval by the Building Inspector,
6. A revised site landscaping plan shall be submitted for Planning
Director approval which includes the following:
a, A minimum of 10% of the lot area shall be landscapes
b, Two street te-ees on 72nd Avenue
of 12 additional trees located primarily along the
s;, A minimum primarily �
perimeter of the property,
d, Approval of the tuaia•tin Rural Fire Protection Prot:ectiort Oistritt of
the revised site plant,
7. This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the 'final,
decision date noted below.
D PROCE;bUR
i
1., I ,;"t ice; Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City •
Hall and mailed to:
i,(XX The applicant & owners
)(XXX.,w: Owner's of record within the reouired distance
.i.:111:XXXX
N:N.N� The affected Neighborhood Planning Or, ani:atioi�r
'i w«1wwwNw
XXXX Affected governmental agencies
' I Mw4NW«wwwrwMWl..4w'
NOTICE~ OF DECXSXON • DDR 4-85 & V 1,O«u8ha - PAGtt
•
94(r-
2. Final Decision:
HE DECISION SHALL». BE FINAL ON _» Ma„ _ 17 ,»»»1985 UNLESS AN APPEAl:,
IS FILED
3. ORt :
Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance
with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32,370 of the Community
Development Code which provideS that a written appeal must be
filed with the CITY RECORDER within 10 days after notice is given
and sent
The deadline for filing of an appeal, is s 3;Ott P.M. �..»,;�.
4. 9 estions; If you have any questions, please call the City of
» Tigard planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW
Ash, PO Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223, 639.4171.
.,— 01/10r,0'4'1 °F
.. •. .».«.»«"�Y.»..».w...»».»w«.»:..w.w»«..,.u»......«..w»w.K.»w.»nr.r..Y».»».».»».u»»...w«»».«...«..»..««:i.r.»»»»w»war...««..»:..w»«.».»»»»»««« »..».».»"».» '""'� w� �ii�.1 '
William A. Manahan, Director of Planning & Development DATE APPROVED
;: Y, (K L:bs/ .326P))
. "------- ) , I 5 Wr4ABLE LN,1 . L -"a .L,.—....»_./•
.....,;. 1c;=:= i
4.
1 e .
n
.00, 6
____ , Y ,,. .,
... ___ y............muiti,—,-1 ,...
( ' -----T-/N-N%:,, i 1 / \ ,--..:, ,
, ,
n
i , .
• T. C w 'Y, 8'Z 4-95 & V 10-85" «.w 1 A05. 6' 1
•
:ar? , ;
I;);
° Nadequ ;.,�, r , (,:,;'),/, ,w� .
Andre & Linda q s ,...>'1 c
. 28383 Ladd Hill Rd. „,,
Sherwood, OR 97140 �r. St. r, gip,.
P,"I�;�� � � � � fir•"' y� '.�.
``I t ��,� .
7
NICHODOFF/SHARP/ %` SHARP ASSOC; '''',7''' �%j; i,
PO Box 276 1
Beaverton OR 97005 k.• ,ft 4 e � ce'Irog, ��'frv� j
Southern Pacific Ind. Dev. Co. j
304 Union Station �, s
. p''twr' ,.
OR 72b9�
Portland' I 9 ��r
� r
y k lI' •
Arlene B. Stites w•
c/o McDonald -
�
8340 SW Ross 1 ( i ,
'. Tigard, Oregon 97223
I
1 , it,,,
h Craig Hopkins P, il;
7430 SW Varrls w. ,
Tigard, Oregon 97223 i
F
1 '.,1,,'0,t,,, .&,,,,, ',1.0 1,,,,,,,,
, ;
4 ,„ ,
i•r-r•' ,,
I
s
afi r.„,.„,., ,
v
, „P,',,,,,,;).i'i ,,
, -
(± r4, 1?"1:'°i1(5'f?ge,,,,y
fe'
i f
, c's(1'4,a
Ih
. ,
ft,,,,
ft, i, LL,„
,,,,, 44,..0,,,
i',;2”
. , ,..„,„,;.
. tie,,,,,,,ie
1
,, „
.1,)-,,,,I . f!;,, .
,
,• , SFtIi
T
1,i
j
•
•
A r. A r ,4 ' • ' ........ • .... .. 1 y•
•
u•
fir'
,
COMPANY 1. ;
l'TINES PUBLISHING
3�i��
7-6354
PO.SOX 30 PHONE(603)634-0360 1:
BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075
4
a
^, . :
Legal Notice Advertising
MAY I
City of Tigard 0 Tearsheet 0 ea aheet Nonce
PO .Bo o x 23397 3 3 9 7 • 0 Duplicate Affida t '�
rd OR 9723
•
Lt
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION �1
n :d i ct. .L, ',iE;;i1y :3 a. :7:47,7:7'' .''il K•,.t k`.yjl `, eP t ,
.?..,1,:,;1-,, , Q �� 1„:44-,;.,�`'�° %" 4. Lk,,4 � +�7F"r �.(, d'p�k
x {Id +w q '3 t Ira a *h" x. ��' 7
STATE t F OREGON,ONE ass. ,i it' i "�"i ,,:i :_,„•,,-,,,
rw �, 1 „ � ' ' �'q i, �� •
COUN OF WASHINGTON, � i, ' ,..-.•
-, .�ti Vii..,k Y',� ;r I,p ,. ,;
r� i, �' is .,'1*k r ,; r "� Y ''w, 1 9 '' 3 a•,
I��.�..w�.—.� 41 4•"/M1'!�i �_ 1 1_ H e
:,,f4.1 rht, �, -rr£, V.r t..tr �, , ,: {� �p' ,ft r
{, 1t
being first,duly sworn, depose and say that.] am the Advertising; ;.+ .yak w*F�x ;tG�, ,..� > 11 . , t_I+„ Q :.;�r, '
�`' Director, Or his principal cler�Cy cf�h$._._.�.:,��r.d T 1'-�I:P..S y � �'� �,�t �y,�p i , ,I �,�.���` , i�,.,+�( �y, N Mr« .,■�{}`ti�>��,,.,+� !., i'':„",
tF'h r T Li_; y k,, .J p y6 1, \ ' +`: . � 'Iy --i W'�y'1;.i.•
a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 k ,_ ,� are .x �k ,, r,r ,,�� .: fir ;, ;
and i 93'x!020; ptibiished at_ T i g a r,d' _.in the ;,,�,,';�,4� ,,. r._,,4,y .,,a, ,"„ „� -,M"' � "r.,; �r _�,, `,' ;.'
aforesaid county and state; that the ti a«-'r.` �. -,' ;. . �� a , `SJ - >r w' =.i,
S7 L` 11 p y\/,�y�� `` �}�ry���qy, �y,.;�a�,`y p 3, ,,ryy}( �+ th p Y q4---...!-',.., _+-,{1r 4,''. .Y* ''..,'Ipi .•;y,'I':i
_—`_e_i.i.L!'"ime.r a_411_ --tir•e w • ,ta`ti y,I ,.. IY . .4 'Ic"tii"q it ,'``.1; {-'+I ,,� t. [t<�x tF !'
{ � > ��1 .. 4 ,�� �I 1T�U,, �,t• � ,�iy x` •I,r�..�,t A 'r.r.:6.',7,..., ''+�, ?���>;elf t"
a printed! copy of which is hereto annexed' was ublished in the I,'�:,� w, „ '� I;,f ,,. , I , ,, , '.s 1,
p I py >
• � p
�Y' t sr � .r i m-+ [t J �.
entire Is Sue of said newspaper for successive and s„ , c. I' err ,� .-, .-:' h' ,� 11. , ri ,eCtjilli a 'the fo$l wing Is lies: q °, .{ ,, 1- � , , t , t �"�' , P k ;
�. ,t!�*V/•."e- .,^li�. ),,'•, y�'\^r ', `—.,4.,.,1:.,..04!...,,,.,,,,,,, ",:, �'i `y '\ I'� '; 'f,1.
r r'!r '"d 'uw '' ,y"C 1 .Pl�..^•i'9'ewr'.w.r""iu",."" '+ ,,rt y"ti• 'x. i.�h.," r" L.i.y N r:;
1 s l�f.l� 7 ::.L 9 0°' , i �..,�'," y<t -..�I...ni�� :.a .>M k ''3I�f ,r.' °,.e 4 , }t t�/x i; ''y-r r.f r,.1;K r .„,-• y i ' +n•
Rr r�? V �^ >r r�t{ ,a„ w� ya` " �,�,,,,a 'sa�,�M + A
_ scribal • "nd, n t� ore me this "�� �.� 5 ,5 ,d! - { , � ;' yys�; y( - V y, a" -''
6 e: 7 r'n.,,,„.,.,1,q`L.i'w)((, '^,�`��y' 4 ,',!,7,lr t i, �'.' r, .w ,11,:,-i,,I} "l'W4p•. + 4
i yt.., r A'4",�wi i, P r. ,, tt��.�:,' 9' M7ut1�^�,r� R ��i �� t,, '•t�Y p't�i� „,..71,11,-1,. .3�,1 �! >t ��'^�"'p{�rj
” "t Y� i�", mow ., Ym i[[ �M 'tir, �" ad ..- i t' 7
b. j.. , S� r r _ r;^l4a'. 5d. n�. k "M q; r - M�
"'• _fie, ra �, r', x r,r K c 3 , °� ,�y�
�'otary Public for Oregon - , ..4A2, �t �;"��� p°"'[ � `f, a °�,t:
1S i ?V V1;t) , .t ih {(h `, ��� r t i''r ∎7�1 I r.'4' !r i A i t _Y r `-I 1
My commission Expires: 9/20°/88 ... . ,. a
AFFIDAVIT
r
I
/ ., ^ r I r
4i
*OREGON*
+•�
" 004 HmE pftgitimui u
�9i r oy P.O, BOX 127 • TUALATIN, OREGON 97062 2 01
iOt
ANDREZ AUTO BODY SHOP VAx ,\' April 294 198 . ,
15785 SW 72nd Avg
•
Tigard,' Oregon 7'7 .. �e � 13753— 2
352D -049'- 00 Insp. Typo : R W
Dear Keith Li den,
•• , This letter is to notify you that a Site Plan Review has
bean conducted for Andres Auto Body Shop Ltd, in Tigard
in accordance with Uniform Fire Code Article 10 to establish
required fire flow, hydrant location and street access for
fire apparatus,
Full automatic fire sprinkler protection will be required in
: accord nce with Uniform Fire Code' Section 10) Because of:
1. mingle 20 foot wide access.
°. Lack of access to the rear building from the street.
Fire Department' connection will be located at the street.
Approval of submitted plans is not an approval of omis4ions
«. r or oversights by this office or of non—compliance with any
app3icable regulations of local government.
CLOSING N A GR PH NOT ON FILE:.
Sincerely:14 t
Eirch
Fire Prevention Bureau
•
ti
•
r9
• REQUE . S FOR COMMENTS
FROM: Tigard Planning Department
•
RE: SDR 4-85 and V 10-85Request by Andre and Linda Nadeau for
Site Development Review approval for a s
1200_ "gaure foot building •
addition and new 7,200 sqaure foot huildin: . A Variance is also
requested to allow a 20 foot wide driyewa � he
wre 24 feet ,is re,quired
an to a. ow i-n t an. 1 % landsca in on the property zoned I-1, (over,
P g ��,��
Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From
information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other
information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be
ro
prepared and, a decision will be rendered. on the proposal in the near future. t.,
If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by May L ,
19 85 . You may use the space provided below or attach a
separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable o respond by tie
above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and
confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any
questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, P.O.
Box 23397, Burnham and Ash Ave. Tigard, OR 97223. Phone: 639-4171.
STAFF CONTACT: Keith i den '
. r
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it � .
Please contact of our office. 1
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
t
Written comments:
n
•
Name of Person Commenting: .
Phone Noy $ �
(gSL:ptn/C356P)
I
ti `
1
•
•
(Light Industrial) and located at 15785 SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 2S1 12DC, ✓�
T.L. 400) . ,.
•
•
NOTIFICATION LIST FOR ALL APPLICATIONS
I• / NPO No. CPO No.
•
• t,
2. CITY DEPARTMENTS
V Building Inspector Engineering-Randy
Engineering-Frank/John Parks and Recreation
3. SPECI .L DISTRICTS
Tualatin R.F.P.D. Metzger W.D.
Washington Co. F.D. No. 1 School Dist. No. 48 (Beaverton)
Tigard W.D. School Dist. No. 23J (Tigard)
4. AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS
City Council Wash.Co. Land Use & Trans.Dept.
Planning Commission � Boundary Commission
Planning Department METRO
5. STATE AGENCIES
Aeronautics Div. (ODOT) DOGAHI
Engineer 4 Division'' of State Lands
Board of Health Commerce Dept. - M.H.. Park
Highway Div. - Terry Flink Fish & Wildlife
Parks & Recrea. Div. ODOT) LCDC
Subdivision Supervisor PUC
....:_.
Dept. of Energy Fire Marshall
,_.._:..�... Dept. of Environ. Quality Other
6. FEDERAL AGENCIES
Corps of Engineers Other
Post Office
7i. SPECIAL AGENCIES
General Telephone Portland General Electric
Pacific Northwest 3e11 Other
Northwest Natural Gas
. .
g. REQUESTS FOR COMMENT SENT
(kSEtpm/0556P)
•
■
•
.; REQUESTS FOR COMMENTS
• b TO: �.. DATE: �'
FROM: Tigard Planning Department
RE; SDR 4-85 and V 10-85 . Request b Andre and Linda Nadeau for
Site Develop gent Review aparoya . for a 1200 sgauze foot building
addition ands new 7,200 sqaure foot building . A Variance is also •
requested to allow a 20 foot wide drivewa where 24 feet is required
>" and - to a 1 -ow; e s s t an 1 landscaping on the property zoned-L (ove,
Attached is the Site Plan ,and aptlicaett's statement for your review. From "-$0' .
information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other
information available to our staff, a report: and, recommendation will be
prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future.
If you wish to comment on this appli4Sati,Ipn, we need your comments by
19 5 . You may use the space provided below or attach a
separate letter to return your comments. 1.t.....Lou are_ unable ro res and b the
above date please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and
confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you hays, any ,
questions regarding this matter, contact the' Tigard Planning Department, P.O.
Box �2339?,�� Burnham and Ash Ave. , Tigard, �OR 97223. �� Phone: 639,,- 171. , .
Keith Li den
STAFF CONTACT
PLEASE CHECK THE .FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY
..., We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter. f
encotmu
C . +600 �"Wra:t� ants. � ��� �
ro
'+..►+rar:ruifw..i-,...,, .,..._ „.. ., ....,_, _ .., roan
1;
Pies( et4,f esi--cfk) (s(i •c-cov- yid- cam,
w gc01,004, .
.trvietii4.4 e F-6 sf &see(
Aee ovt ecei ev sevAew, %.
lo+ .z 4410(A10. • YrctO et4
Name of Person Commenting: .
.
... i
t�:ng: 0
144 .�.....
' Phone No
4 .1_ii§;11442/
(k8L: rr/0,356p) etotvos , .
•
u
•
1
(Light Industrial) and located at 15785 SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 2S1 12DC, , `1
T. L. 400) .
•
I
4 S
4
d
4.
r / +
1
•
.
1
1
I(
1
4
f
8 S.5
•
•
REQUESTS FOR COMMENTS s
TO: I DATE:
j/�j/�• 1 .,
FROM: Tigard ?l: ing Department
RE: SDR 4-85 and ,V 7;0-85 . Request by Andre and Linda Nadeau for ],
Site Development: Review 'approval for a 1200 sgaur.e foot building
a
addition and new 7,200 sqaure foot buildin: 'A Variance is also
requested to allow a 20 foot wide dr wk�
iv ewa ere 24 feet is required -
and tb allow leis I n 157- landscaping on the property zoned I-L (ove
t Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From
information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other
information available to our staffs a report and recommendation will be
prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future.
If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by ..121_12___
, 19 85 . You may use the space provided below or attach a
separate letter to return your comments. If�you area le to respond by the
above date please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and
confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have, any
questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, P.O.
Box 23397 Burnham and Ash Ave. , Tigare., OR 97223. Phone: 639-41710
CT.
Keith Liden
STAF F GONTA
ITEMS THAT APPLY:
•
PLEASE� CHECK THE '
We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact
of our office.
refer ,to the letter.
Please�re �he ehc lased � � � ' � �
Written comments: C., � ��'�C. .� ..� �?•�
r
di
N.e of Person Commenting t,_ 4t , ►.4
Phone No:
kSL:pm OL56Py
•
•
1"--.2 `-'8 c
ege " ;cce
REQUESTS FOR COMMENTS ,..�__,..
TO: Ak..1[;df. '� ! .' ,� Ldid...4! A A DATE:
FROM: Tigard Planning Department
RE: SDR 4-85 and V 10-85 . Request by Andre and Linda Nadeau for
Site Development Review approval for a 1200 sgaure _ fol building
addition and new 7,200 sqaure f o o t A Variance is also
j requested to allow a 20 foot wide driveway _where, 24 feet is required "
an to a ow ess t an d landscaping on the property zoned I--L (ova
Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From
informations supplied by various departments and agencies and from other
information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be
prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future e
If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Ya 1L�
19 85 You may use the space provided below or attach a
separate letter to return your comments. If you are Unable t_orespond by Chi
above date, please, phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and
confirm your comments, in writing as soon as possible. If you have, any
questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, P.O.
Box 23397, Burnham and Ash Ave. , Tigard, OR 97223. Phone: 639-4171.
STAFF Keith Liden
CONTACT:
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLYi
We have reviewed d the proposal and have no objections
, � to it. �
Please of lease contact o our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
Written comments: V'-e`4
I wr....r.....r
Nature of Person GomMent Lng.
Phone ,boa '
<S L:pm/0356
•
•
(Light Industrial.) and located at 15785 SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM. 2S1 12DC,
T. L. 400) .
•
4
•
(M.
it
I 'r
�����
n �
1i
r'
•
•
v
•
I I
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
ENGINEERING 'SERVICES REVIEW CHECKLIST
REVIEW OF =„�. r. -e'"e 'b-8s' SUEMIT'IAL CHECK
(TF ITEM WAS
DATE NAME A,� �ivv �= U
`��15.J CONS D RED)
4 I)' AGENCY COORDINATION (OR) PERMIT CONSIDERATIONS
A) Federal . . , , . . . . . . .. .
• C.O.E. , E.Q. , F.E.M.A. , U.S.P.S.
B) State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GI,
___________
L.C.D.C. , State Lands, Commerce Dept. , Board of Health,'
4.D.O.T. , B.R.C. P.U.C. , Water Resource, Wildlife,
ti
D.E.Q. , Parks & Recreation.
C) Regional •
Metro, Tri-Met
D) County ,
U.S.A. Public Works, Health Dept. , Land. Use & Transportation
•
E) Local . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .,. . . . . . . . . . . . �- .
1) City of Tigard:
Development Setvices, Operations, Building, Engineering,
I ,
Engineer, Finance, Administration, Council, Planning
ComMission, Park Board, N.P.CLI
(NOTE: Pg. # 2 for details hereinregard)
2) Other.
Fire District, P.G.E. , .N.W. Natural Gas Water Distri
Gas, 1 c tir
Telco, Storer Cable, Solid Waste, Private Ownership,
School District
T I) GENERA L CO NF ORMANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
A) Transportation System . . . . . . .'. . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . � . . . . . . . . [a-
1) City of Tigard:
a) Comprehensive Plan
b) Street Classification(s)
c) Bike/Pedestrian Path Plan
d) Traffic Studies
(CH 2
M Hi
ll & STRAMj
.
e) Exxstin g; Pending, Ondet Construction
2) Regional Transportation 'Plan'
B) Sewetage System . . . .
1) City of Tigard
a) Master (Sewerage. Plan
b) Existing, Pending, Under ConstruCtion
2) Unified Sewerage Agency 'Regional. Plan
C)
Stormwater .Runoff System'
) City of Tigard.
a) Mater' bra.in.e e Plan (C1-12M Hill)
b) F i s , C OE Maps, (Floodplain
& Sensitive Lands)
•
( 2) kegional,.' Stoicmw t ater anagement ,Plan
• D�' � ) Par)t & Greenway Develdpment 'Plan
E) Capital imptovement Otogtam
1) City Of Tigard
2) Washington County
I I
•
•
.,— *..,.,..v..,,
r
•
•
•
•
,
I
•
rwr+wru, 'M..,�."�r•�,�� r 'e "raM w,a{.
w
+.0 �...,q cry_. �NI W^"'..,• y,Y va,, J'� `�SulyNy � ,,,+ �
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
.
n
•
,
,,.,. ... .. .,,a...., .. i.,.,.. .. I'. ,,..... .,r.w,. ,..,, .,,.,_ ..x,J.,...i,. ,....,., �.....✓.. �..,..,,. „�,., a ,. , , C
• , • 0 , • ' ".-R� 1 R H
•
•
{ o
1, a f' L,,
ENGINEERING SERVICES REVIEW CHECKLIST (Cunt'd)
F) L.I.D. Development & Non-Remonstrance Status 0
! ITEM #I(E) DEAILS• ,i
Sensitive Lands . Comp. Plan Amendment E
Floodplain. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 Zone Change CI
,,
, Major/Minor Partition 0 Conditional Use .0 , •
Planned Development. . . .. : . . . . Temporary Use 0
• Annexation. . . ..C1 Variance vlk �
Building Permit G1'''7 Nonconforming Use. JJ
, Sewer Connection Permit.. . . • .0 Accessory Structure
Sign Permit 0 Tree. Removal Permit 0 '
' Fi2.1 Permit .0 Blasting Permit .0 •
St!reet Opening Permit. .'g T;g . ID-7-7 Special Assessment. .s. . . . . . . . u .
,, 1 Compliance Agreetneht pr . . . .0 Business Tax
.0
t t� ,�
Detailed Plan. . ,.4.1,s4'''-..". . fi ? Eees. . y�. . . ,ag t. d C�
' • Dedication. : . . . . . . .. ..... . . . . . . .0� ' 1 Joint Use Agreement .0
� "'
( Easement. . . . , . ► 0 � Agreement. . . .Maintenance . . . . .0
System Development Charges: Ca �.w 5�;1'4 p� , , , . CC'
' Extra Capacity Streets. . . .. C]
Recreation Facilities. . . .0
Storm Drainage 1 Improvement: . .Cl
Sanitary Sewer Surcharge. .
. . . . w .❑ ' ,
' III) SPECIAL CONCJERNS: 1
A) That this information (form) ',be routed to the City` Engineer
Th on (f
('
for review and commeht. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a i y'es Le r 1.. Nod •
'..' , 'a, e. , ,ti' l■. twtt, Vt-ottose. _e)reAcoos . 1 e\o,\"),.., ‘v \'':1-\\e.A, \be, I,'
y
lb t,' \-e..1 " -a.e-e.vt.:J, „, A.V.!... tA`tr VA vV,V.AVZ-' AN5kt^A'trr
(,) 46.14 •S % ,e9),„, 4c:itiaCS�- ..
k
4 c
r
1
4 t E'
ENGINEERING SERVICES REVIEW CHECKLIST' (Cont'd) I'1
tV ) RECOMMENDATIONS:
Apply the "Standard Conditi
A) ons" noted on pages #4-6 (herein)
B)
I.
I
i'
i
.I
1
I. •
,
I
4
1
{,
1 It
I 1
I '
I 1
I
Gi
I
• I OZ 8 x Attach additional
she�tS if nedessar .
a;
Page
Y
•
• STANDARD CONDITIONS
v.'''. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, AU. CONDITIONS SHALL. BE MET PRIOR TO ISSUANCE,
OF BUILDING PERMITS, p "
AL..ts
i wsko +ce... toe v. Vi e
Standard half-street improvements ,) mod- idewa k-s —•etrr-b , c r J
""'ode
*t h-t• -d-r- u rpm. ,-e-term--d. aa-m e--•a.rid--t t-i.-l-i-L e.s--(4e-te-t-e co.
-rrrerpp44c a b l e-- t-e m - shall b , n s t a 1].e d �-
i _
rats
frontage, Said improvements along : � ,;i� t.,.:"7?- �+ v44
shell be built to
conform to the al i. rtin ent
_ and a �
t- nd���1 da a
C.� fi a r S
N of
existing adjacent im rr vemen L
$:
���� '�� ._. -__. ___.._..... -..._�.....�._...�._. __.
Standard half-street zmprov „merL s including sidewalks, curbs, '
streetlights, driveway aprons, storm drainage and utilities (delete
inapplicable items) shall bo, installed along the
frontage: Said improvements along
shall be built to w _
• • standards and conforms to the alignment of
existing adjacent ent im r ove e
n
is and d (or)
_...�...
>
-91,
sets of plan-profile public improvement construction plans
and one '(1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a .
Registered Professional Civil Engineer, detailing' all proposed public
improvements shall be submitted to the Engineering Section for
approval
Sanitary sewer 'plan-profile details; shall be provided as part of the
public improvement plans
• �. Construction of proposed posed public improvements shall
not commence until
after the Engineering Section had issued
approved public improvement
plans', The Section will 'require posting of a 100 % Performance Bond,57, s,4,1
ham- payment of a permit fee i . •s t-era. -t-i , -t-ree- °i r l eye
(' of a street o ening ,
' Also, the ecut�.on p permit 44: -e9
eem - r-wefamen shall occur prior to ar concurrently with the
issuance of approved public improvement plans, SEE THE •
ENCLOSED
HANDOUT GIVING MORE SPECIFIC INFORMATION REGARDING FEE SCtEDULES,L
pONDING AND AGREEMENTS,
A one (1') foot reserve strip granted to the "City of Tigard" shall
f' be provided at the terminus of
be dedicated to the public along the
d� 1 right-of-way shall e
A d�.t�:ona g y
Frontage to increase the right -of--way
to feet from centerline. The description for said
dedication shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline at
established by
s and approved b.
be City form �+
shall a art p
h P
l
The dedication document y the
• Engineering 'Section. DEDICATION "OP'MS AND INSTRUCTIONS ARE ENCLOSED`D
4
M
•
r
•
Add i,t ionll right of way shalt be dedicated to the Publ i(: alony the
• _..._ �..._. .�_...' ._.. ..�.. , frontage to increase the right. -of-way
to see -.from ,e e description tion for said
feet fr centerline, 1h p
dedication shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline as
established by
The dedication document shall be on City forms and approved by the
Engineering Section, DEDICATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS ARE ENCLOSED,
• Joint use and maintenance agreements shall be executed and recorded
on City standard" forms for all common driveways , Said agreements
shall be referenced on, and become part of all applicable parcel
Deeds . Said agreement shall be approved by the Engineering Section.
JOINT USE AND MAINTENANCE; AGREEMENT FORMS ARE ENCLOSED
Street Centerline Monumentation
•
1. In accordance with ORS 92.060 subsection (2) , the centerlines of
all street and roadway right--of--ways shall be monumented before '
• the City shall accept a street improvement
All centerline monuments shall be placed in a monument box
conforming to City standards, and the top of all monument boxes
shall be ,set at design finish,grade of said street or roadway,
, The following centerline monuments shall be set;
a. All centerline-centerline intersections. Intersections
created with "collector" or other existing streets, shall be
set when the centerline alignment of said "collector" or
other street has been established by or for the City;
b; Center of all cul-de-sacs;
c Curve points. Point of intersection (P.I. ) when their
;.. position fails inside the limits of the pavement otherwise
beginning and ending points (b.C, and E,C,),
d. All sanitary and storm locations shall be placed ih positions
that do not interfere with centerline rrnnumentation,
bearing s
The "basis ' of g �� for the Plat or Survey shall ,
be , which is a part of the Tigard Field
Survey Network,
After .
Director, the 1phiatashall be i"ecoredwthcWahin Washington Public Works
gton County.
RSC;bs1072yP
I • • A
.Q•
i ti i
C11YOFThARD n, ,
. , , : , :, : ,. � COUNTY,OREGON
6
•
i
' •
SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION ' '
CITY OF TIGARD, 12755 SW Ash,' PO'Box 23397 :, '
Tigard, Oregon 97223. 7 (503) 639-4171 FOR STAFF USE a NLY ' ' •
CASE NO. Z
RECEIPT NO
APPLICATION ACCEPTED ':Y: ,•
DATE:
1. GENERAL INFORMATION Application elements submitted: '
• , PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION / '7f 5(e) 10 iid L ' (A) Application fora (I) ;
:,i ln AO (B) Owner's signature/written •
I.
TAX ' 'AND TAX LOT, N0. , 1, . • 0 authorization ; ;
' ; (C) Title transfer instrument (1) '
• SITE SIZE 4 6 oeve � , (D) Assessor's map, (1) '
PROPERTY OJNER DEED H OLDER
.jdzi Y lt 7del Nadal*. (E) F to t
F lan (5 copies)) . ,
•
ADDRESS .,3Y, c d 1 . G PHONE ,62.5_145:11.9_2' C ) A PF licant'
s statement
.
CITY ." ZIP
q714'0' , ; (5 coplee,) , •
• • ` APPLIGANT*', Igm Qs 04..., , L (C') List of property owner's I , y
•
ADDRESS PHONE within 100 feet (1) •
CITY ,', ZIPS . ,(H) Filing fee tsO
• *When the owner andthe applicant are different ; ,
•. people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record
or a leasee in possession with written authorization DATE •DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE: '
from the owner or an agent of the owner with written '
authorization.
. ' The,owner(s): must sign thin
pp��ication in th
a l � � the space provided on page two or FINAL DECISION DEADI.INE:�,��
t
mi a itt h this applicatio COMP, FLAN/ 4N$ DESIGNAT
sub wr en a.ut orization With n.
2. P •
0
MtOP�SAL STJIMARY
The.owners of 'record of the 'subject property
view b Number:_
,I request site development re approval to 1�.P.0
allow'. ` . ', 0.... to ll:tA;4 io_ t ► to
t 1-,,,, Approval bat '
Al,„. '' '' ' ln.A.L.11., (:'',.:...,mud 's_L.'bil.s_Lagg_i' ''':, .', ',i.'t:.r:.ila1260: _e: ': '' ' : ....... .....'„_. - -- ' '
e►• ° ' ' 4 . , .,,, Final Approval b' to
.
nni E
. � 1P1�,a., i ,, I, i ft ilei°°
Etig nnerin
g .....,...,.. . .„ . .,,:, i, ...:,.: , :.:.. i ,
'( ,
' 4. List any variance, conditional' use, sensitive lands, o �ther land' use actions'
. ' ' to be c ns idered as part of this application: iO(i 4ea,r1? , ;!;i t/''1 4-/ 4,.. • i, '
e
. a a complete a application You will need to' suti�it attachme
5. Applicants. .1b.' have.ve pp y attachments
'described in the attached information sheet at 'the time you, submit thi;.
application.
b. THE AFPLICANT(S) .SHALL CERTIFY THAT: '
, , A. The above''' request 'does not violate any deed restrictions that ma be
' attached' of imposed upon the subject property. ' '
. B. If the application is granted, the applicant ',mill exercise the rights. ' '
granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all ,the conditions and
' limitations 'of the approval.
• C. All of the above statements and the statements ' in ' the plot plan,,,,..''
attachments, ' and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true°, and the
applicants so acknowledge that any' permit issued, based on this '
application, may be r t any loch statements are
evoked if 'it is found that
Eal'se.
D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including'
' the policies' and' criteria, and, understands the requirements 'for approving -
or denying the application.
DATED th '
is day of .. 19- .
SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the•subeet property.
' „ ,.0.,e, ' '....-,-„, /...:../. .,E, -44t '_. : ', ' '' : . ... : ''
.
K . 05� F
SI, �+
P
.
?a
,+,1:Jy
•
C11YOF TlOA
WASHINGTON CAJUN I T,OREGON
ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE APPLICATION
CITY OF TIGARD, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397
Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY r
• CASE NO. '
RECEIPT NO.
APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY:
DATE: _
1. GENERAL INFORMATION Application elements submitted:
, PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION ; ,;5'(,x,1 12 (A) Application form (1)
(B) Owner's signature/written
TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO 'c / 4/CO authorization
(C) Title transfer instrument (1) ,
SITE SIZE 6? acee (D) Assessor's map$(1)
� � 'r
PROPERTY OWNER/DEED MOLDER* I"iC 6` ,�,�/ �3'. , Ct (E) Plot plan (5 copies)
ADDRESS c.i 3 ,.. dd./1`fI& PHONE _ 5-5 9'l. (F) Applicant's statement
CITY _ L 5,2 . .aR ZIP 97/V (5 copies)
APPLICANT* e`VYg!, (G) List of property owner's
ADDRESS PH "°' (03/":5141, within 100 feet (1)
CITY ZIP (H) Filing fee ($200)
*When the owner and the applicant are different
people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record
or a leasee in possession with written. authorization ,DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE:
from the owner or an agent of the owner with written
authorization. The owner(s) mustsign this
application in the space provided on page two FINAL DECISION LINE:
�'$ P p or ' 1ON DEAD
submit a written authorization with this application.
CO MP PL AN ZONE DESIGNATION!
2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY
The owners of record of the
subject property
P P rtY
request p Number:
uest permission for a Variance to the N.P.O. � ., �
following w provision(s) of the Community
Development
ent G ode Approval Dates
clinOto n54 t.t IZ'.P.t
4. Final Approval of Ctnditions'
c.Mki2C4 ' loll,
Planning
Engineering
,0711 , Po, 1 riff 4,
burl t 64'
lettia s‹.alwait
G .�
. ,
4,.' List any, !cond,(.tional use, site development review, ,or 'other land us actions ; '
to -be'consider �id as part of this ap.plicatlon: ' j- ei®i '4 .ii tit..„) •dit
'''.5. Applicants. To have a complete applieation,'you, will n.eed •,to submit-attachments :
, ' descri'bed ':in; the attached informati6n sheet , at the time "you submit •,'this : 1 ,
application.
0
6'. TIE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CER. 'IFY' THAT: ' , .w .•
, N ' ' , . , ' , ' , ', ,:„ ' , .' ' , :' ,, ,.„ , , : ' ,, .
maybe
A. The above request does nOt violate any deed restr .ctions float
attached to' or i posed upon the' subject property. - : '
W. If the application is grtinted:, the applicant will exercise ,the: rights '
granted in accordance with -th'e terms and subject to all the conditions ,and
limitations of the approval +
'C.: All, of the, above statements and the statements ' in the, 'plot plaan, '
• attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, 'are true; and the
. ap-plicants so acknowledge that any permit issued:,' based ' H.oh this :
application, may be 'revoked if it is found that any such statements are
false.
. D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including '
' Ithe policies and criteria, and nnderatands the requirements for approving '
or denying the application.
DATED this
____2,4 , day of ! 19
. ,
..SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband' and 'wife) of the subject prope•rtys .
, i ' . , ' .:. . ,/,:_c.:4,,... _ __. / ' ', '. : ' ' .
w
"
' (KS jpm/t 521P : '
r
• F M1 .w
« •
•
• I
f
w.0 k»
aRM Do, 3d! �Sia v an s• as s Law huy!l,hir .t0 Portln hc, Or I 2a
c 1
� {t
w
°� {� ' V 4 8 1 w,!,
..�p,,A. ,„,za �
4kRR A Tn y�RJ� � �q 37 4n\Y AL AO��liK
. ( n,x rr., •
INDrv; uAL( ANTOr
• i ;.i ,. ..:.....,,;,«.«,, ,.WI LL IA C e BURWELL ' 1
,, Grantor, •,
. r conveys and•Warrwants to �ANDDRE 'AU PAU.r and LINDA NAI.Th AI.T
. husaa.nd and. wife
.,r•,...«r ,r.«.,:r.rr... ..........., ,..«. r,:Gr�nntee, the following described real property free of ericunnbrarrces
' ' except .as s»eczflc�ally set forth'�herein�.situated in • j'‘r4., 1,111.g t on «:.... , «.Goutiiy„ Oregon, to-wit: ,
except P
r
k �` 1, TI e 8 0 . fc et' cif. ', Lot 41 "l�IJi�,C CREEK ,ARE, TRACTS in
i
"` ) the City of I,Tigard, Washington. "County«, Oregon , 1
`�.�
,
I
I .
I
I� t,! IAiU DESCRIPTION ON Rte EkS� SIpE
J CUNT k S 1
l i J 7 I
I i�
AC[. IN
SJFI:CE
SPACE:,
1
�,� The said property) is free from enr..crrnrarances except' Las en ent recorded d 11/18/77;'; Book�. .
° ! 1216, Page 698 Was'hing'ton County~ Records l; Assesswonts,l o Uni H i rid
Sewerage Agency and City Liens of record .
°
1
.
r
h � �, ., a „9,,P.,,,°_,°.....,„« «, H�ie�cc�n��� 1 wrtlT tfie re urxurnent,, of ORS , 3,0.30
'hc,�true consrdEr�atton for Conti eartcG is $ ,. ( Y1
,t I Dated this ...«•«:.”:(P..,.day of w...,.'«. 'iU ,l. «r,«» ««.....,., 19.......« z<
• , I I
tw
l
7
f I I'd�,�✓'/,/� .A�'1 r.. .+"�" _ ,,fir_,•. M'«Mi ,I ,
�.. «... ..«..,.... «. «..»v. «....»«.,»....._.,.,..», ........«,... :" L"O':E�L:.e«�; .y:} y ".ti ,SwM;Grt�N:t"�ta'1Lw ��,«.»'_..
( r ,l3.it �'IC'1,„ ri,, z,wel1) 1 ,
• , , TAT ,OF OREGO1V County of_....1 c_ k: tn.as . ss, . t . . .w•... ../. ,..., 1 , .,.
, 1I Personally`oppo relct,the above named .....«.;.«« W.7. . ,1.7..Xil,.C;.,.„_2t,1, :x4..0 ..]. _ «, .._«..:..,... ;.,,. ,::,,.:,. . , •
4.
I
/ 4.'+ .,,....-.'P; ... :u..««.,...,, rend acknow.red ed the foregoing' instrument to ie..,l`1i.5. ^voluntary^act' and deed. It
I
*
i ' i Before iIIe' . . 11 w.'Fr .G R� eT�Y•.., A ' �we� :.. ' /J I
O1.vii'I �.6, ,) r' . Notary for Ore r n McUn miss :�pireS .«,» L4� » ..«: ..,..... '•
...._ «. _ _ _N..:».t•w..«..•....._.w••^.....•..,.«. -- -«.«•..^rtrNVV-v,4.w,,.5 T,
................ c ►
• .
. I 11 am C. Iruls,'c .i. 'a , ~14a i s6v; !
I d� � i u re t i t aRnrrro � 1 ' �,
,'; �'� �; . coutity of Ua hingtan
.�)r .,� �<� �� I Ir� F�bner �Tl�bihssen;, flireotor of. �eeards
_ ..._ ,»« .«. w: . : :, and Eiectiens and.fix.Offieio kecorder of Corn ,
•
�._::� �.. ry ;i,,rr:» 'a,r�a'r s �r+ '4 -. m n i t`r I �,t' a ' veyenees far saki addrity,'do hereby certify thhet i `
Aftor rocurdirrs toturn tot I t ”' the Within'ir7etrdr�i�rw of v rating vues i>�e'oived l
` • ,t,l 1 , hl��tiler M ,4, ,,
r ` i�t�� snd, recorded in book of records of sr�#d county. y�
I PN T , X60 1st St,r Lake C)swel , rf ;� ..�a r 4.,
, ,,,,,- '« ,�a � yR G3 fF�THC�+h1�Way ( , C�ir otbr of«r.' t.^. « �».,.r,«w«.�..w.« ru a+ gar>tr t ,.' Yi�tit�l,'�»<,� 1 vt tlhl .1., .�
1 .:^!.. k' ..4f. .4�'Q • gr F<.,i, �..r,.., p ' w.rwr+V !
.. .. .«.•.»«ar., «... ..«.««L, �" I •nK11.1tnl«wr'F!� tN 1
1 y {yyV /� »N
11Y�t»r1 I?Vt7�»[':.�..]1 ZIP �! ^N:V w'. ij , '� Y�ln w ,
I' I nr,1 1t,,i�1‘ rrrd V tiry �?
U.iniii'a takings is raiguettidi all tag siatonnaoit rs, ,h',; , j ��
Ova bo,,,oat to t)io followirid atIdrasat 'A t, -.�r,4 IN 0 . l
.IAtt.Cd,rL ,«N•a.de,au....: «r«,r », .,., «»»«».,. .... . i „,; i !1'
, s jlvti ' ,ti , 9 •00 IN go, 1 , ,i,
-,,,. w
s.
..., �, u 1. •.r»r.,«r««r« .«,x«..ru a«.w,«x.,«•..r {:« «. .« «.r«..r««» '
4 NAt,Jt•. bbl4CSti",zth, Cis
n d«:n ii i w r ; ,
11, r1:1' 1111x1 ��.
.,.., 0,‘" 1 A k ■ l
I
' We, Andrei and Linda Nadeau, owners of the property at 1578 .
Southwest 72nd, Tigard, Oregon, currently occupied by And.ret.s Auto Body
Shop LAm ted, wish to construdt a 1200 square foot' add1.tion to our present .
into ,, butldtng and an add,,tl.onal 7200 square foot garage to be part�.t�toned,
. two 3600 square foot spaces
,
. The 1200 sq. ft. addit1on would be used Immediately to expand our
' '. • business. The second building would provide much needed automotive service
space for a maximum of two small businesses. These two businesses and our
existing Auto Body Iepa-.r and t.'ai.t Shop would be mutual .y benefttted by
'et : their proximity to each other.' We have several parties interetted in '
leasi::ng° the new space. These would provide needed automotive services
to area residents arid. use our property to our best advantage.
170, i association with this application we are submitting an Admtniatrative
Variance Application to allow a 20 foot:access drive rather than the 24 foot .
standard and a reduction in the 'amount of 1andsCap .ng from the standard 10
I H
to 1630 square feet or roughly 6%. ;'' , 1 '
We have dtscussed these proposed bu Idinga with two' contractors) an' , .
" ' eng1neer, an archi.tectura1 designer and two fire marsb.all.,s In hopes of best
utilizing an extremely long and narrow piece of land,. We have also explored ,
' i ' '; ' ' the pos''s'P�.bilit ,es o.f obta ,ni.ng adj Cent land to no av�ai,l.
The 20 foo t Acca ss
d r1 re 1s necessary b� ecaUse that
; space was left after,
bii,ld•ng in, accordanee with existing zoning iil 1979. The second dr+tveway.
loot
p�. p o n used inn the fire
�� � � � which would be l.b� in our ra� axed a�ddit'I� �� has hover bee * ,,
y ear
5 the
bu �ne
as has
operated. We a y nee s P xp n,
s a4 8P400„6
W6 can not expannd. `into the new hui,ldiz g because of the d LLiculty of
6 o p erSri tg4J 1 g work mid, hayJ ' Y yl iL stYl�ll M e �,y1 two ��ry a t�on(w h
current Manpwer.
e
I � ,
M
. 1
This 'could; .
change f ' the ,volume,,of work . ire to expand. trz'the 'future.',but'' H ' _ .
' ' current predict opts put this far away. We wish' to operate a 'small,' hi gh'
' '' ' ' quality personalized ,repair shop wiitch needs the close` supe'rit3,slon `pons- �
. ib� e to one bu1;ldi,ngd ,' The 'proposed •ado�&tton would, do this. The second,„ ' '. •
' building .would mean, that tf we expand i.,n some „future scenar&o45 we could.
move' the body shop to the new butld1i ng..and use, the entire front bu .l.ding, '
for the pant shop,, cleanup and.. estimating functions, This ins, however, only ' ,. .
a very distant projectton4
. ' The reduced a .ount of landscaping is not oesi.rable„from on.r poont of
' view, but is an: unfortunate. necessity because of the narrowness.;.of, the. " , : H '
property and the 'importance of maxi mu.m parking because 'of the 'automotive ' ,; ',
,
nature ''.b f, the bu Si ness. We are-designing the space with the idea, of hav ,ng ' � , .
' ' ' as many vehicles as posslble ii irtst.d®"s' This is i.rnportart also because of '
•
' the posstb iIity of vandaltsm.. Also, 'since the back, lot would remain I n ' ' ', .
. „ H : sight-obscuring fencing as it now 1s, any landscaping ".n' that area would ' „ .
: only be visible from, wt thin the parking ng Lot_. The part of the property. :
Visible from the street would be landscaped' fiery much to keeping with the .
� open greenbelt now envelopthg the area.. ,
We thank you for a.ny help you can provide and, look forward to rbnt(nuing ' ' ' '
growth and expanding service to the c mMUn ;ty. ' ' '
.. ,e,.:6;kr', ..' ,„1„."-4:'„,.•.'.- .''...,'' ' ' .''',.' '': ' 1 ' . ' ...'-,,. ''.. ''', ' ''.. ' .
Andre 'tIade6u _ :
7 L 1.nda„„ e.deau
„ „ . . .. .. ,. . . , , ,,, ' ,:: .,' '. , . ,:. . ,, H ;:,i
.
•
a ,
I
Application for Site Design Review
• Andre' and Linda Nadeau or property at 15785 SW 72nd., Tigard
•
Adjacent Property Owners
William ho do: '
�. amNc
25�. 12 DD 200 (east) �, ,�.� �.
Martha L. Sharp, Mac
c/o Sharp Associates Inc.
P.O. Box 276 .
Beaverton, OR 97
•
231 12 DC 200 (west) S ontherri Pacific industrial Derv.. Co.
30i1 Union Station ,
Portland, OR 97209
231 12 DC 300 (north) Wenj fan Properties
15606 SW 72nd Avenue
Tigard, OR 97223
231 12 DC Soo (south) Arlene B. Stat.s
c/o Lynn B and Monica cllonald
830 SW kos
Tigard, OR 97223
•
•
•
I