Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
SDR8-83
POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. S • `...i,,. +t` v,. a M,✓..'IL'.4: ♦I4w:-,!..f.,,,.,p�' , ,x ,., ,.n4,4.:.''•••.t., F.^•,'ttA.d„_'-N,.r•.A.^. 0 ,.-�S+l S+Y,m�i;.+�ll C`r r,.,:�N4 :!, ;'�'dvY tAls rt iA xK.n 9µf�-,.� r ,:y1 C.�� t ".!•.:... .....», iu_�.....,.li:,.. ro rriyy, .w,: .. ... i',';',•,,.,''',,'''.,,,','1,1‘,':„''''.2�•1� :'r n�y'r�'•:p�r1'.*t��/t't'� 1'',,:,';',',.',-,,,,.;-''':!:.'6,- t �� rJ a '.,'Lt � ',,47E B BMI'slSV `f,',' r ;,'",:',1'.,:,i',....-,, t '',' It ,.k ^�PR 18-83 ,'_r : T .(r. 1 t',y I,lal'a� J ,n: h, 41' rr (:.: r ,-,r.. y�• '1,,:§. ji Jwi If i,"':'s.''''''''''70'''''''f(J { r.` '''...,'„'.'-','v'';',.-,,.,, •`1 - 4 r+i. 'ur In\.;Iryy:,,,x,•,aM,✓:z,,J•,7=:,;.Y,%-'q„,,u'.,re,,,,r r1;»„n..,..Nt.,∎:,.,w,, ,. ,n,.r•,.+.en..Jr,,,r`L,dpy..'k„Mwi',M,,,3„.;..:..J" '.•r • . • i;. i f ' • • • , { • , a , : { I iI t z n i i I I I , • • wir.r" r M }Y . . . , , . _ 4 . , . ( CIT'/OF CITYOFT1RD E ' WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION 1. The final decision was filed by: Director of Planning. & Development, Concerning SDR 8-83 on May 31, 1983 i Case Number Date ; • 2. Name of Owner E. Lee Robinson - b in s on 3. Name of Applicant E Lee Ro__... 15305 NW West Union Rd. City Ptl. Ste Or. 97229 , a. - .' Address • 4. . Location of Property: ' • 7165 S.W. Fir Loop Tigard, Or. _ _ Address Legal Description n 2S1 IDA lots 1200 & 1300 11 5, •Nature of Applica :tion Site Design Review 6. Action: r---1 Approval as requested . 1E11 Approval with conditions • • r---1 Denial 1 4 Notice: *Notice p to: in the newspaper & made 7. published an ce was publ�. The app licant & owners Owners of record within the required distance [R5-t71 The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization (''' Affected governmental agencies ° questions regarding the names of the persons or agencies who .• �T1' there are t ues g • a• _ available the Planning Department. • received notice� this informatiOn is a�'a.2lable at 8 Final Decisions � fact, decision* and statement of condition can be The adopted findings of facDheckrar, City of Tigard, City Hall; 12755 SW obtained from the Planning Ash, P.O. Box 23397, Tigard; Oregon 97223. the e case of a decision on an application for a variance; the applicant /, must acknowledge this form and return it to the city of Tigard, planning �ta Director, bef,`ore'any building permits will be issued or engineering ap nro. given • r-- Date l.icant°s Agent Signature of Applwicant ©r.' �,pp over� .1l / 1 1. • 9. Appeal: An appeal -1 has been filed [-iF2.31has not been filed. r Note: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.84.2250, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within fourteen days after notice is given and sent Notice is given on Nay 31, 1983 , therefore the deadline for filing of an appeal is June 14, 1983 • 10. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, 639-4171 . I . 1X F , 31 f/ V i • FINAL ACTION • STAREPORT STAFF P RT May 31, 1983 TIGARD PLANNING DEPARTMENT • 12755 S.W. Ash Ave. Oregon 97223 e Tigard, Or g DOCKET: Site Design Review SDR 8-83 E. Lee Robinson NPO # 4 ' APPLICANT: E. Lee Robinson OWNER: Same 15305 NW West Union Rd. Portland, Oregon 97229 SITE LOCATION: 7165 SW Fir Loop (Wash. Co. Tax Map 281 1DA tax lots 1200 & 1300). COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATIONt Commercial ere� a1 Professional Iona 1 ZONING: CP REQUEST: For Site Design Review to allow construction of a 20,400 sq. office building. SITE SIZE: 47,520 sq. ft. • PREVIOUS ACTION: None APPLICABLE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES: The City shall manta •� �.1.�, y maintain an ongoing i involvement program , g citizen �.nvalveme s re that r:itizens will be provided an opportunity and shall assure " all phases of the planning ng to be involved.in al P i All property owners within 100 feet of the site were notified by mail of this application. A notice was published in the Tigard Times ajd May 5, 1983. In addition,` NPO # 4 was notified of this application. 2.1.3 The city shall ensure that information on land use planning A issues' is 'available in an '.understandable form for all interested citizens. d parties are given at a minimum, 10 days to review • e este g t r p All interested the a lication and submit written comments to the planning ng department and are encouraged to do so. The planning staff was available to answer any specific questions persons may have had regarding the application proposal. 7.1.2 The City shall require as pre-conditions to development approval that a. Development coincide with the availability of adequate service capacity including: 1 } 1. Public water, 2. Public sewer (new development on septic tanks shall not be allowed with the City) ; and ?. ,, , Wage,. 3. Storm Drainage. e • facilities i.e� ar b. T'he 1. Capable of adequately serving all intervening ' u properties and d the proposed development; and 2. Designed to City standards. f . c. All new development utilities to be placed underground. ' P Public facilities are available to the site. The applicant has submitted a storm drainage plan. Sewer and water connections ce are to the site and the ose services were not noted, however, 1.h I I I City's Building Division should check the proposed connections. • 7.6.1 The City shall require as a pre-condition to development that: a. The development be served by a water system having adequate quate ' • : water pressure for fire protection Purposes; v . b. The development shall not reduce the water pressure in that area below a level adequate for fire protection purposes; and c. The applicable fire district review all applications. The Tualatin Rural Fire District Fire Marshall has 'reviewed the application. SITE PLAN/DESIGN REVIEW The applicant is proposing to construct a 2),400 s q ft. office building I on 'a vacant lot in a developed office park. The plan as submitted meets all of the dimensional requirements outlined in Chapter 1.40 of the Tigard Municipal Code. • parking requirement site is 58 space •(20, 00 - 350 = 58). The The arica.n re u�.rement for the. szt space 4 !3 spaces. the site is points on W site plan shows p from four oxn�s o 1r sit M r " shown as 20' in width. The Tigard Municipal Code r�.r Loop which are s g required access to commercial deVelopme commercial nt as follows: 0 . . ` requirements �- commercial and In4ustria1 Uses.. l8 64 Q5b minimum xe' ux.r q _ Vehicular s for commercial access and egres ommercial and industrial uses shall not f be less than the following: REQUIRED MINIMUM . PARKING NUMEER MINIMUM MINIMUM PAVEMENT SPACES REQUIRED WIDTH SIDEWALk ETC. 1-99 30 ft. Ward surface pavement over 80 ' of required a+ cess width' no curbs . N re q u77.e STArr REPORT SD11 8-83 Page 2 1 ( S.W. Fir Loop is improved to city standards in "front of the site. The applicant has submitted landscape and irrigation plans. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Director approve SDR 8-83 with conditions as follows: 1. Prior to issuance of Building Permits the applicant shall provide the Building Division with written documentation of consolidation of Tax lots 1200 and 1300. 2. The applicant shall submit a revised access plan to `conform to the standards required in Section 18.64.030 prior to issuance of Building Permits. • PREPARED BY APPROVED BY: �/ d ®• '�` " 1 .ter ry Elizab, h A. Newton illiam A. Monahan Assoc( te Planner Director of Planning and Development 0 pt. ku i I I S�A FF REPORT SIR 8-85 Page • • I • I r , AFFADAVIT OF MAILING • STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) City of Tigard I, Diane Me Jelderks, being first duly sworn, on oath despose and `' says i . That I am the Secretary for the City of Tigard Planning Department. That I mailed notification to surrounding property owners of II pending action by the Planning Director of which the attached is a copy' (Markea Exhibit A) upon each of the following named persons on the _ day of a - , 19a�,�by mailing to each of them at the address shown on the attached ist (Marked Exhibit B), said 9 notic as hereto at •ched, desposited in the United States Mail on the ./ &�day of , , 1.98V, postage prepaid. # - " Subscribed and sworn to before me on the ay of „n.! JV ea n G i,°,J+»wW,i� �n� roes / i 91 .N M N Myy e.d i� :, uuTM N , ,� Ne TARY PUBLIC OR ORE ON • My Commission Explre;s • I , yI Zt, n?" .... ., .r , ,.. r.. .. ,• ,. ........., •• 1 r rJ + 1 1 r• _ FILE # SDR 8-83 E. LEE ROBINSON TODAY'S DATE: May 5, 1983 FINAL ACTION DATE: May 26, 1983 Dear Community Member: This letter is your notification that a Site Design Review is scheduled in your neighborhood. Specific plans for this property are available in this office for your review. Written comments are encouraged. Please submit correspondence in advance of final action date Note that the final action date is stated above. If you have any questions, please contact the Planning Department at 639_,4171. • Sincerely, Elizabeth. A. Newton Associate Planner E . dmj (see map on reverse side , • • r � ��E �. 1 \ • l 3• �U+1:A A p + �- < + x- _ ._,. 1 ` � , 4 '/1 SDR 8-83 A request by E. Lee ` r-- 6 • Robinson to construct a 20,400 sq. +w ft. , 2 story, wood framed office , building on two lots consisting of 11). 47,520 sq. ft. Property is desig-• nated Commercial Professional and is zoned CP Was. Co. Tax Map 2S1 IDA lot 1200 & 1300 ' w Y411i►b ' • r v" RiA t + STREET e 12 x t , . 1 4 ...a ' ► 1JJ1.J 'uu ADDINGTON E• IR,e� Robinson HALLBE,RG HO INC ii S W rha m Rd. " t $ 65 a. • 4 • 153OS NW Nest Union Rd. Ave. Tigard; Ore. 97223 1710 NE 8 d Portland, Oregon 97229 Portlan , Ore, 97220 • 2Sa IDA 900 400 HAROPOLE LAXTQ FIMEEL ' Route 4 Box 342 8901 N.B. :1sey, PO Box 25153 , Portland Portland, Oregon 97225 { Sherwo d, Ore. 97140 , ire on 97220 .g 1000 500 2S1 14A 100 r VARITZ V � . K):1„..-0 /1-*. : ,..g Dr/ 10995 NW Leahy TIGARD SCHO, DISTRICT ' 1 ' - e s Portland, Orego 97229 13137 S.W. P:cif is Hwy. • ` � }'' Tigard,, Oreg►'n 97223 1100 600 ESTRADA RA C1CHINOOK INVESTMENT COMPANY ARTY DA , • 1028 Bank of California TWR 1306 N. Jackson.306 ,, Portland, Oregon 97223 Tacoma, Wa, 98 06 , . 2S1 IDA 1000 0 j 700 VAN GORDER . STIGGE , 7100 S.W. Fir Loop Dr. 4717 154th `lace SE . ' • Tigard Oregon 97223 Bellevue, Wa:h, 98006 g �' • 14.00 800 FORD, KOHL ,, , e... Court 2 l5 0 Valley,�t 4 Weatherstone Y Lake Oswego, Ore. 97034 s West Linn, tr. 97068 1500 ; 990 STENERSON WEIGEL/K.UEHL 15380 SW 88th A e. i , b 22 a sw Canyon Y o n Court � Portland, Ore. 97221 Tigard' Ore.e 97 23 9 1600 4 .,1300 SOUTHWEST OFFICE PLAZA ROSSMAN , 258 Roy'croft Ave. 8840 SW Avon Ct. ' Long Beach, Ca. 90803 Tigard, Or. 97, 23` 1700 Q 0 1400 1 WHITE/HELLMAN/PINELLI DENNIS 508 Laurel 8820 SW Avo Court i , Lake 0swe o' Ore. 97223 97034 Tigard, Orr, 972 281 1DB, 1100 251 120 4500 'r ROBINSON ' NSON ST1aRN E S ' ROBINSON ° % Crumpaeker 15740 SW Hall. .1vd. + , . O ' 02107 SW Greenwood Rd Tigard, Ore. ° 223 I w , Portland, Ore. 97219 0 281 WC 4600 HAX�E L E. Let l'.o1.3iti,Sori. 10115 SW alh'iot Tigard, Or . 97223 ° • April 28, 1983 Plan Review Application - General Narrative The construction of the office building located on lots 14 and 15 is similar • design the 'buildings on lots 1 , 2, , 12 and, 13. The building located in deso n to 011 lots 14 and 15 will ' complete my development of S. W. Fir Loop. 9, 6 1,46Li(3i 0 otielt 05 • • .. r . I ,- t • I j l �Pj li I 5� 6t 1 • � Div L CITYOFT1RD WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION • PART 1 EXPLANATION OF THE PROCESS • 1. The Design Review process applies to all new buildings and structures, and to 'al1 .P sisal improvements and relocations, a dditions, extensions and exterior changes to existing buildings. Design •PLY to single family dwellings UNLESS The Le Review process DOES NOT AP 2. si n it has been specifically made a condition of approval as a part of a prior land use action. 3. No building P ermit' gr ading p ermit a P ark..in g P er mit or sign permit mit wi ill be issued until a Desi g n Review Application h as been approved. , t has been. ranted to the Planning Director (T PP MC Chapter '. 4. A royal authority y g 18.59.020(b)). • 5. The Planning Director's decision may be appealed to the Planning Commis- sion (TMC Chapter 18.59.020(c)) . must submitted to the Planning II be su g 6. The information listed`in Part Director as a apart of your Design Review Application. re 7.; Note: In addition to the requirements in Pa rt I I staff may require tho following: a. Planning determines it is within the public interest, If the Director deter due to the complexity and/or unique;'►ess of a proposed -project, the Director may require the services of a licensed architect and/or • landscape architect (TMC Chapter 18.59O60(c)) • b. The Planning Director may require a bond or other adequate assurances as a condition of the design plan in order to assure the completed projects in continuance with the approved design plan (TMC Chapter 18.59.080) .. The Planning Director ma y require L e dedication of right-of-way g.'ht o f-w a y necessary to con�crm to the comprehensive plan and o f f site improvements including but not limited to street improvements, ;pedestrian ways, lighting and signa1iz •tion may be required upon the Planning Director I ' finding that a likelihood of an increased need for esuch improvement A is created by the proposal development (TMC Chapter 18,59.100) . 8. Design plans approved by the Planning Director remain valid for one Year following the date of roy pp . . • Within a al If construction has not begun w�.t one year, a new application must be submitted (TMC Chapter 18.59.090) u • t -2_ PART IT ' 1. The following information is required: a. Completion of a "GENERAL APPLICATION FORM"; and b. The name of the applicant and legal description of the property (township, range, section number and tax lot number or subdivision 4 name, block number and lot number on both the plans and. narrative .- statement) c. Twc sets of plans drawn to scale including: 1) A site 'plan, showing topography, and a vicinity map; ilpArchitectural drawings; and t A landscape plan and irrigation plan. 2. Part III consists of the factors the staff will consider in evaluating Your proposal - You may wish to submit a narrative statement discussing individual factors in order to assist the staff in its evaluation and in order to expedite the review process. • { eri I n ' i1 { S 4 { te • -3= STAFF ANALYSIS DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION PART III - Findiis ' NAME OF APPLICANT: •-• g \►''1' .c 1 j LEGAL DESCRIPTION: File No: • , 1. Relationship to the Neighborhood (TMC Chapter 18.59.060(d)(i)(a)) Will Will not A. The design plan and proposal: Interfere with: Interfere with: 1. The development use, or 2. Enjoyment of other property in the vicinity; or •' 3. Orderly development of the •, neighborhood; or Ak ti 4. Otderly development of the area as a whole; or ' 5. The design fuo:ctions of: 8 • public lands Public P rights-of-ways c , Finding., ti Will not Will nOt will -ti i 11 t7,,' '4, ,,,, ?.' B 1 The design plan and proposal : D►ireetl Gtilmtil Lively bitect1,y � r + \w,. impair, inhibit or limit y ,, f*.rther development t on• d n '`rr 1 the tr alAAe p M op a L t y �1, a Other Ij w 3. Public lands ; �, 4 i Ri. hes-of-•ct ays X • ti S • ? .. \� 4 . Findings . ( ■ . , 2. proje ct Development , A. The design plan: Yes No 1. Satisfies the functional requirements 2. Is compatible with surrounding• developments Findings. ,• 1 ,-. , , • , • • ,,: t' Safe ,prl'e'Ss'in� Livable• design tan provides' at • Yes No yes No Yes No environment for 1. People using the .� . development; l 2. The immediate neighbors . and 3. Ebe community a a Findings: ', • I _ , • -5- C. The landscape plan provides for: No 1. Proper and adequate landscaping; . 2. • trees; w. 2 Maximum retention of trees 3. Minimum. soil.. removal; 4. Minimum grade changes; and 5. Is in keeping with the general appearance of the neighborhood or area. • I ` I Fzndi.ngs: • cr Yes ' D m The plan: No < I , .. I 1e Conforms to the natural size contours; 2• Incorporated special. d es%g ns to i. accomodate the unique topographic features. Findings: , I E. Required land No 1.•j landscaping ing provided Yes , rovided; and `red 10% is , Minimum re u � Provided; : front i2 feet 2. • Residential gone' provided; or f : front 10 feet. provided; 3 Commerc�:al tone: ..,... , . I Industrial zone: `h feet � Inch ne. front � provided; and p by Paved roadways i .� ,�. A:1�. -areas not occupied b� p• Y or walkways are landscapedt 6. Tree and shrU1a planting areas ate a minimum of $ feet in width within parting areas$ and "i. . ', ,u. :.... .. i. .�.. ............. ... _ .inn... 4... .. .. f n ...r • Il � A , 6 , Yes No . 7. Tree and shrub planting areas are approximately 70 feet on center each way or in an aggregrate amount; and l®. 8. The minimum 5 feet (landscape strip along the lot boundary has been provided; and �..:. ,. 9. Parking in g and d loading areas ha ve been effectively screened from view from the public right-of-way. • • Fznd rw. 3. Aesthetic Design A. Adver se visual effects are minimized or Yes No eliminated by this design as related to: 1. scale 2. mass; � 3. heighth; 4. area and �.a d building materials• 5. surface and subsurface drainage; and pp t structures; t 7 g 7. reforming the natural turain; 8 structural appurtenants such as retaining wa'l l s • i 9. circulation elements including ("' a. areas b. paths nights-of-ways l0* other' improvement a* utility lines b storage areas c. service areas 11. views' , 12. vistas. 14.. general aesthetic value of the neighborhood; 4 _ 1.5 by f d ' the b seta a Findings 4. Minor Deviations Granted A. Yard Requirements 1 1. Deviations Allowed } Percent Yard Feet Required Deviation Deviation ;. Deviated lay Zone Allowed Allowed 2. Findings: a. Reason that the deviation will result in e: superior design: !or b. The practical difficulty associated With the natural site 1 characteristics which requires the deviation %s . �,., _.. ,,_:: ...::........,... ....... .. ....... ........ B. Parking Requirements Deviation Allowed --8- ; • • No. of Percent Spaces Deviation Total' Deviation �. Required Allowed Spaces Allowed, k , o , 2. Basis for Deviation yes No 1. Availability of public transit 2. Multiple use of p ark,in g facilities 111111M11111EMO 3. Special conditions a. Elderly housing 11111. IVO ' Type of un Q it ' C e other NM 3. Findings: .�.. 6 Action Ab Approve B Deny C. Approve with conditions . Basis for Action 8. Gone tior's of A toy .xn,.... r. ,,.u.nri � nx ... -,. n... ..4 r,nr .4...r..; Sul. u.. v e... rvr ..I_. 1 w......... ku.._. e ,.„... .r y ' • GENERAL APPLICATION FORM CASE No..__ � 0 - • ' CITY OF TIGARD, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397 RECEIPT No. _ S z Tigard, Oregon 97223 -- (503)639-4 171 . .. t � ONLY: { ., 1. GENERAL INFORMATION FOR STAFF USE • PROPERTY ADDRESS ' .,„.k31,..„)r ;► G' Assoc rated Cases: LEGAL DESCRIPTION ......../ "'- , ,••' �.t — INTERNAL PROCESSING: Accepted for Pre-App ZE �� SITE ,�I <2 PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOx,DEIZ* ;6 ,:•4? s"i.?.111,c1.3 By• PHONE ?P'"' O 2 Pre-App. : ADDRESS 1C N fvU' _ Pp Date & Time• . �r APPLICANT�`_ r k v .',A, '' f,DDRESS PHONE —:. Accepted for Decision: • CITY ZIP r ---y- _ 'Where the owner and the applicant are different people , the applicant must be thy. purchaser of record or a leasee in Hearing Date: possession with written 'authorization from the owner or an ati.on. . The written Hearing Reset To: agent of the owner w;t rh written it ten�author rz . g �. authorization must b( submitted with this application. UTh ORIZATION IS ATTACH ision. filed & marled • REQUIRED LETTER OF YES NO. • • A ED� �'. 2 Q _.__.. Dec FOLLOWING: APP. Accepted for Appeal . _ a '3. THIS APPLICATION INVOLVES THE F'OL"L FEF. ' FILED PAID ve P'Lan Amendment - ,.•,., G om rehe ns�. P from to quasi-judicial w-"`- Hearing: g• legislative Date of Dat one Change from to ' quasi-judicial `udicial DESCRIPTION: legislative' Comp: Plan Designation: . � Planned Unit Develi�spment concept plan detailed plan__• Siibdivi ion µ NPO No. - Major ?artitioi _IIMIIIIIIIIII Minor Partition Zoning District ;,. Design esign Review N • _� Conditional Use Zoning Map No: Variance e to Zoning Orditiatice r Quarter Section No • (Title Variance lsto Siibdivi:sion Ord STAFF NOTES: : . , Sensitive Land .Permit Floodpl ains Drainageways Steep slopes P P •• Other .. . IIIM . +{+{I I t ._.. '' _ . . 1 'GENER� L Ai PLICATION FORM k,' AGE 2 fi. CASE No. fl ' CI'T'Y OF TIGARD, 12755 SW Ash, PO Bax 23397 Tigard, Oregon '97223 - (503)639-4 171 `' P 't� INFORMATION (TO ,BE 'R.OVIDED BY APPLICANT) FOR STAFF USE NLY I ' SUPLEMENTA Notice df • Response A• • . enttPivPd 4 DISTRICTS \ 'es o Yes SCHOOL /ILSTRICT ' ' kst)...___2,_.%3_,5_1,_____--. ' . WATER DISTRICTG' 1 I, , . . _......_ FIRE DISTRICT / . . ° L 0,4 1) • !' PARK DISTRICT • • UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY Sewer Available: YES NO , • • OTHER - i . • ' 5. PUBLIC UTILITIES ;. . ELECTRICITY F.,,,,, '' �/°„a ICITY NATURAL GAS lv _ — . TELEPHONE �;, w---- OTHER 6. PUBLIC TRANSIT (TRI MET) ----.7g, . ' , . . 4_, ' '., .. , ' , . . AND STOP .. '"Y ` .. NEAREST BUS ROUTE AN � � 7, OTHER INTERESTED AGENCIES (SPECIFY ' , _ , . . . — -- iiiim ' , . 8 CHARACTER 0 ' THE AREA EXISTING LAND USE PLAN DE'S VERIFIED BY STAFF 'IGNATIOI� ZONE NORTH t .. 1 SOUTH EAST 1' i t iESli �.r • • . • • GENERAL ',., CASE No. APPLICATION FORM�,_ WAGE 3 ' CITY OF TIGARD, 12755 SW Ash,' PO Box 23397 •. : .Tigard, Oregon 97223 -, (503)63974171 9. CHANGES IN THE CHARACTER OFTkiEAREA .WHIC WHICH AFFECT T HIS APET�IGATION. Please Discuss: • C u: ' ' 4.47' ,e,-,' :eadh ', C r , • . , . i 10. DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE /1(.,. . Lot Area (a^res, square fez ) 1 11. EXISTING STRDCTVRES ON THE SITE Di�tanc From Property'Tine ----- —_ Square Use' — _ oi.r poet.' �1 h South East Nest • • t :NATURAL. CONDITIONS cent S lope --. 12 Per ,�. Ave. - g ter Percept Of Etch r 13., Sege Cation '�"YPes: _ r a e n name Yes No - Site Of Trees Per Size • Trees° I :, "'e ` - ---- --- Grass How uiueh cif the :site. i in foodplan , .__ - ..y'pe?;..r . ... 15» Water Cciurses .. 3 what � 16. Rock Outcroppings 17 y Other. i8 Pto osea Oevelopmetnt: r'1ea brie 1y di5cr be t:he proposed develop ent:� , r., , •e:', • a, • i •„,5 v t ' ' • . ' dE.9'.__ w�, „ GENERAL APPLICATION FORM PAGE 4 .. CASE No. CITY OF TIGARD, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397 '' Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503)639-4171 a� 19. The following, is s is not 46, required. ' 20. Overall Site, Development Residential Commercial Industrial Olen, Siace Other Roads Total No. of acre or square feet per use ,...•■ .�:..•■ • Percent of site coverage I_________________ -° 21. Type of Residential Use and Characteristics # of Bedrooms/Unit T, pe of Use # of Units p sed Density j. .._._._. 0� � _...._. .. Pro o. 1111111111 r .,.. 111111111 1 N . 1110111111 •• .0 22. Where applicable , please explain how the open space , common areas and recreational facilities will be maintained. Y 23. If the project is i to be completed in phases , please describe each phase of the project. (f. Please submit the £oll0 t ing vith this appl ication.;Lcat icn 9 ; 1 Written General Narrative, number as required by Planning Dep attm en t. \ 4”. + 2. Proof of Ownership 3; Letter Pp fit is not atrctier, L�'tt�r of authorization if �.• l�.ca 4 Ta leap r 7'c Staff Will identify for you, whether this section is to be cotipleted.. a . , GENERAL APPLICATION FORNI -- PAGE 5 CASE Nn CITY OF TIGARH, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 , , THE FOLLOWING' PEOPLE, AS REQUESTED BY THE APPLICA11T, SHALL BE NOTIFIED OF EACH HEARING. ' ' (e.g Attorney, Surveyor,; Engineer) Staff Notice Notice Report Decision. , of Review . Nave E' . Street . City State Z Name I , . Street State Zip ...._ ...� , Name Street Cit State Zip y Name Street CityState Zip --- �----� . • APPLICANT OWNER �' `".•• ' 1 , - te'ee / '. 0 .)///Sc.te4 , ' 1 . ' . . - Ib • .• ... .,,.... .1. I ,ins nl ,.rnv...r ....., r r.J ... .. ,. r e..,i.. . 1 + r.J.,, ..ul ... .... ........... . ... .l+.. r.,,..,..mv .t ......'L..r,w .1 , I v ..t.t . .i. ..-u a • I 1 In accordance with Section 18.84.030(2)(h) of the Zoning Ordinance., every applicant requesting a development proposal is required to meet all !' PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE requirements. Please consult the Planning Division concerning these requirements. ************** ; *************** In accordance with Section 18.84.030(2)(b) of the Zoning Ordinance, every applicant requesting a development proposal is required to meet all PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE rdgirements. Please consult the Planning Division concerning these requirements. *3c***fit*******Y ************** In a� 18.84.030(2)(b) of the Zoning Ordinance, every accordance with Section. 18.84.0 applicant requesting a development proposal is required to meet all PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE requirements. Please consult the Planning Division concerning these requirements. ********fie****c ** :*'****fit****** In accordance with Section 18.84030(2)(b) of the Zoning Ordinance, every a PP licant teq uest n g a develo ment P ro P osal ls required to meet all PR.E APPLICAT ..q +m Please consult the Planning - lON CONFERE�VGE r� u�.remercts. Division concerning these requirements ****fie*fir**** s r * . - ...� .n,.:.P .. .,..,.:, I.•,_r r ., 1, r ,,,, _ >a,�. ,c _' ,.: ��i� , " A<. ''A,' V 1 ' 1,-,....-,,,',.....,„ ...,.......4...._:.-.'”..."-",,�._. 'v`,'-4_, .'.y w�J ;;, 4f4 ,wm. r ., . 4 023.'81 1 ,,, 458819 , BUILDINGS a, h' ' n r„, ,1f .M, ` ''.1_Iy rr y.,%, . q,r i4;1.4t4.,), w. ,, , , r .. , 1.1._ , , ; Tr ,r'V,.:,I i:I: IIi:E3i tiY A i'V,1C LNIAG sACTri rd GIVE ASSESSEJ)VALUE HINCTUN CO o E1(EPIPT ON M . L 2S11DA 01200 11,' NNr;TA<iG,f.S ,FDVAII,E" '6 7'800 68 O t ) • 'r w �" ' { wMlr1 4 •�+r1w�MM'�-J.+�+•+�.•�4µ +vy p `f{ /t�p y y q y/� �''r."j Fr' r�1 lT ,1'4N r„$1r� f r 1,91,•.:1,k",,;,,1 4y w... /,i x.!4A F L'A(H r1.0.Jid'1! 1',23/4 1,0.4 1 , IO-1•I3,1y `tAX', 0 2001 1 ' Ir ;.ot'arr's'14 Y7Ax �; 1631.9,5 1641t»98 j . ._, Rstirir.1hNTTAXE3 LEVIED f3Y TAX RATE `TAX AMOL'JNT.; k .1Cr.fi: WASHINGTON CO 4.02 ;74...57 • 3 PTL0 COMM COL rvt PORT OP PORTL .14 , .';, r'.+6,:57 METRO SER DIS .19 ;1 ,.98 ' ROBINSON, E LEE WASH CO ESO .26 11..76 '. 11125 SW GREENHURG ROAD SCH DIST 23 13 01 '8133$.59 is r TIGARD OR 97223 METZ WT INU 4.05 `}`' .42 rl • METZ WT COMB X85 : 8.06 . ; UN IF SWGE AGY .55 37.57 G TUALATIIN R PD 3.28 224.03 LOT 14 BLOCK CITY-TIGARO 1.12 76.50 ;' . 55AG ' 72ND BUSINESS CENTER i' I IRT 1641.98 1, , r ZONE = M- 4P-U I�I�;, = Y �A `TC1TAi�a l E4',[+PAYMENT BY STATE OF OREGON ' ' '' it r q I ,rr 11?�f wii;- ',, r�., : 1 A X 't"r 1'3 f,3,1(' it 11 , i. ,. ■ * ' , 1 , 1(ii �,L TAXE;,,ArND e SSESSME,NTS 1641.9 8 1' ,e',f ;. µ,,el; `C !,1., ,',pr"ivnic, t Arid be fc)re di colattt) ; ASSESSMENT AND TAXATION PAY i. '° � P C. BOX 3 5 8 T C.+;.,,w. Rr,,•l A,L',r it"y�•VEC PAY ELY O1 tEr r'r THESE AMOL1NYS 1. r ;;wr-wl� YO'RTLAND, OREGON 9720b ...•. .1 49.26 11°15°82 I 1592.12 ' I ) ( 503) 648.1'87 41 ;; -.--,..p..�,•�.. -.M . ��. 21 .8 9 1072 47 5 11 .,: ..1 r{ ,r ^\r)� r.- a1+I,,r,.1...;.,,,.. ,..1r w.•y ∎,w - .. W r M1,. Y l 1 J k f y'q 1 • n 4.".uw 4 ° Y F 547.32 1 r a. `I ,.MY ♦. r n 1. • Irrr��J . •' , +rte-i.+,v 7' l �rt•V- •.k w ;111~1 ;,."•C ._ ..1i." rw.EE-1 i'. P I , I . - r , I , , 1. • . • I r a r r • tM r.r• •, ..n.r,r rxv w. ..,r .r. , r r........... r,rr. .,,..r w •. ; .. 4' • ,‘ n ' . • . 1 '0. -r 0... ,P,4 L. .,i " 1 k`. a ro , Y t,,.,/,,. a i4. t v„y,,,-,, _ . .. 1 i 'M. A +�'"t,"40' k, a''''''.. i r,�.,�«,.+.,•.�uw., rd�0300 t3Y31)11--.i t ii " 3�° 1 '58828 i ' I BUILDINGS r Y r i �,,�,.,,�.�. ,,. .,. .w� , 1 ,,,, ,.,.,tiro a ,'t',E ,,,I, .}i',,t tk t•'r A PE ICE 1'41AtsE 1 A+,TOOli 10rtt1IVL.ASSESSED VALUEr 1"..83 � �" x,'n� �,a��'x t�E � � �F��>~ti �k�.} � � ,r� ,....,_..,.,,�,.w,r-.�.—,_�_,.....,.,�..,,.,w.,_,,..•,..,._..,_.... .-�. � , .' ," ,i t, „'. i , ,.c ,'. , E ' r 1 i t ,.4 l'''E-)(E"MPS'I*ON I N T CN CU a t ! T k ro 4 #100 , 66300 1 • 2 1�p�, 01300 , ; �-��, �,,�;f ,�;:;. nt�: A�': E.sa I '! r,x,�r,l�,. .r---,..,,,,,„, ,,t,„,`+1+'4'r: R, i K,,,iiA'TP t ik,t'4-# $1 clt7X {� `,, . r q x r D 200 F e y b a 1631095 1641,.98 E,�E.E{1 1 i+IA"jV S�pro... Iii {'"� ��t f"�;r� I�%,1 r ,' � u�.�.. .,ice.........+++-�` ' ' CLIRF4E NT TAXE LEVIED s Y TAX ELATE TAX AMOUNT 't ' '''',Y1.li iri A gi41 iit 1-D N t G �4. ^14, PTLD COMM COL .57 38993 I ' _, rrr PORT OF P1 RTC .7.4 9.57 . METRO SER DIS 4.19 12.96 . • ROBINSON' E LEE WASH CO ESO .26 17.76 11125 SW GREENBURG ROAD I SCH DIST 23 13..01 888.59 TIGARD CR 97223 1 NETZ WT IND . HETZ WT COMB .85 5.8.08 , ,,, UNIE SWGE AGY .55 37.57 TUALATIN RFPD 3.28 224.03 • L0I 15 DLOCr} CI I Y--TI GAR D 1.1 2 8..513 • ., .5,5 A C a , 72ND BUSINESS CENTER . . f .,, o F ;„, tErT'4' TAX "1oT,A.Eh.,, 1641.99 j LEY PAYMENT BY;TINE OF OE ECON 1 • s ti, :,;1 a , .t AAAX 1'E; •E4 ,ME;Ii' t!t43 V 1; 1 .i.try• :• YE, a E::1E `;t.,), 1; , ,) +p �{J��■ yy/� �,, L. l; t I 4'i A',.:6.•:a 4 I t.I∎,ro 'tiv'!.,. rf.�A'Z/A a I� I •!^14,7. r -s ro• 'T•.>: ',, :, "I CTAL "TAXES ANf. ALSES,SMENTS ro "� :,,:t4 t',,t"ii•},,f,14'riii ri'}tttlri bC"Et11(?discount).C t 1 t':1 i�a _ PAY A �?ES' PI E 0 MIS N a. r•i+rh�" + n,t.°i��'•7 � }' Ej CS I C��TE E.� AMOUNTS I, A;�sf" P C. 8 0 x 3587 ..... ". .. —1, �•..E ,. r- -49.2 6 -:-� �e m 1592.72 k, ...,., OREGON N 9 7 2 ' " 4..._._,.._.. , i roT PORTLAND' QRE _ _ � �( 03) btu i•'8741 21.89 1 3x2.7 5 i� w.. � ._, i , 547.32 ' • �� .-r , '` ;',r-r`.Ki rti"trF° Ero ",?r,P,' �..ta1` t,,,frir. ,l ,"T -1,4 r .�� ------' , ' '-'--"''-----. L.., , . 1.'"I'l __,..,,,_,,,,... ,S t,,,,t,ti C. Id', ..F,...,..++w ' g .w...,, .yam• ,! ,., L,..,-+,• .,r,E.,... ..., i'S,t..1 t%t,L,,,,..-a.,,. .... 4 �` ' • 0 LU1L. `0 ek i� a, 1 . fi. , t • . r, ---� ; I _ ' „' ®. -."y `.'L -..I -fit - ° :.-• G LINE- CURVE DA.. a - _ Q R. L. Ch_ _ F = - ' ` •L TES s' 1_ OCr ao.oXV 7!! 4• IOJ _ 0�A !� ,� ' I AND LOT SCALE: 1 36` , . • - - -_.- w Q_ • Dd1�E-.IANi1wE3Y,191 7 _ 2r'�i4RNS AR , S.E. 9;f0Or d f _50.00 78.54' 70.71 ¢ . E. I.4,SECTION I,,T 2 _ a ._ _ 3 90•KIQOC; 30.00' 754' 70.7 R-IW,_ CITY OF TIG:RIB WASHINGTON'COUNTY ORE. o- soES.i�" - � COUNTY, ORE. srrad*sQ Sa�.c+�' 7154' �7 ik ' • � ., ._ g-• ..s��• _ - EIO.Stc� _ JL :.00' �:1ZS.00' •:►..*.'e- �0T CURVE DA r _ .�5 .- ` $ T•. 1u ., 90 oob� to...0' 15.7r `14. -' / i . 1`, . ; ! -I 9O CO'Q r Io:oa' 15.71 14, l ;' -. rO - 1 1 33'49'.44' ia,00` 40.15' 59 - i i I.` a c . p 2- 25'29.14' 68-00 34.25' 30 fy�t,ry'�r' /f '°° ;, D a -1 i - - I 0 3 ,3CP41'0::' SQ_00' 36.41' 35 T- 32 !� 4 30 00 68 383 36 -..,. _7. :o;saa 0 = ao 47• $ r. .I'I�• • •_ .. _ 23,88l� - - S 25 2IP11- 6x.00' 30.23 30 r 44. - -a - ! - i � � 4 a - - g _ I i 32".00' _ �.�d 37.99 3T -- I 3O„'1°14.,di -f I r- `'' 8 36.23`32` 68.00' •4320' 4a - 1 I - t ®1 ,fr. . • 9 25'29:1‘.: - 0,'1.00r 30:25 30 F ,a }� I .O!� 1 i 10 29''06'5+'- &&.i`9' 33.37' ,33 - + I -,1,--c= _ 4.�4 1 bm ti ,��'�-od�lroC-E I 11 25`21'50 1600' 30_10• 29 sit . f - O °d.t ~.l ' ,_,,d,".1'"-nO -y ►co_oo' b, .4, 4'�''� ;!4_ca' 12 23'29'14- 61!.530' 3025' 30 I j r .- Q tf - ' 1 a�v_ . 13 300'56 6ll.O 4641" 45 ` . !a oorti�'oo=a: �se �.7�'_,_ �-o,, 5-oc°1!a'aA• la;b.ea` - `�✓ 90 0c` 19.00' 15.71' 34 _ 13 _ _ _� �_ -� I'J 30.00.00. 10.00'aa- fl(g. - �..-, i. a i 8_ .-.. 1 90'00 CO-_ 32.00' 50 27' 45 t. ' s S�` ' A 3'•f e 8 14 9o•oO'f;BP 3<.oc; 3037 43 inTi` ��'-` '+ 2c+,'7�f.'♦ !S °,c700'0d 32.00' �.0.2T Q`- r = ,, _ - got' _ 15 90.00'0Q 32.00 ;50.27 + 0 1 6 s ffi a 4��,as_o3,� 41 - 0 i 1: i t !TOR C• tom. 03 Ut-0 I O 0 .l d a ! N 13 Y_ 0R S tEtTIFYCAT j nL. d !d-' h lJ-oCYy2'C]O`E lS3.V3' IB } .�..m.= �+ ' - A;1 w) IL tli N Q• 4 3,WILLUAH L- E„FIRST BEir:,ULT SURRl1. t ^ - yls C) ` 14 , . 15 2 1 N IVIWEYED AND$ARXED WITH 5/8'z 30'::ON-RODS.AU .= (� S � � `7 v O �s�'Ti.�+D 23 Too , 31.E S `� IAAr LYRE CHAIIt,Ea IN DIREi1lD?!THE LARD REPRESENT/ { �` t) p _..wa-�a-,c- cam_*!'- _ 1,7 G ' $ ..0 1 :'ESS CENTER`.AND AT TIC 1IIITIAL POINT OF SAID.SUS _ L -� 6 0 y I 3 ,'RUN PIPE-6 BELOW THE SURFACE OF THE GROUND,SAI[ t - - IH: ` -. ':! !"1A"- - !n_ . - . 1• -E .I :. _+0'-E'409.17'AND N-89•I5'37•-E 50.02'..FROM A.:STDe - r ! t-C3Ti ••'a Yt 0,' 1! P _ L NavE l''a �.-r�Zo►'t _ - -i O b • l3 :. t q {NE H.W.ORA3W D.L.C.ND. 39:THENCE:5=89'15'37 1 - - I; a asn-s:F:>_ - ,- a! •. _ t t *�u! p 7ZI3O AVENUE C.R.X72;THENCE:ALONG SAID CEkTERLI! _r: Tlc.►a-lr- !c.,ac 'tis 3rnFZti3:_ P I R i.R - s' ; ,Y X T S O U T d A1CtitT-OF-WY S YARNS. • 0 EXTENSION Of AT . ,Ø. �. � _ J � , _ Cu°.1,85Z A w"i-1 �=P `:I01TH RIGKP-OF-YA7 IINE M-39'2D'38'-f 575.04'TO= i R0 ` I'1 _ , td_el Q i - )"0 $ . !'I'.E['E41'ERTO?0 T1--- 111GtiSUI'NR. 217:733AR St AL01_ . F +c�O.7�IT� -.5 s•`ts. - .1 I - iep • • y^ - r-c'... -T'A 6S.i:- 1,i!:E 1?.:+FERLT LINE OF LOT 2.VARli5 ACRE:, _ ,. r .3� 1; - ii .0'' ii G TH SERttER F SA 1.07 2. 6'1 Y,. 1 s .a'•s• `�<` ( - 'IPE IBG THE SECORNER DF SAR i.OT 2 L� ; t 89 I` • 1 1t a0-33;5 A�' fANTAINING 9.41 ACRES IIE1'. ' ; - 2 2 :u-ocy- E 145-_a* �%•�_ C„ -xi 4 ' • - QO'a o-e. r33.fD1' s ' a,_ 7.8.00` _ _ Z 8 '- . •'4'•t I, SIBSCR1•�'iv OLFic.� - to-a_a _,a• ''‘...;Z.'- '1 1, Ko-` �.-.: i 1 O1eS IRm THISIf�OAY AF - -- 2 2`. ' s7 so 4 PROF E551QtC - ' `per �. _ 2'S`-ZS- IJTOL.1'TY SYOt-!'[ c:�G-� IC.1o* elts `s• 3ti• � ` LA.'!tZ SiJR1 -- 16.V* IIe'so'•. - CRAlNAG`E E PC7€STRiaat�-� ` na•!O d,� _ get E WAY LS . - 1 i _ ,a,,,=r fir " ' 1 . 04 I 5°RECO`• NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND I 4 .0 . ?• I w a.I 141'CCI iI55IOIG EXPIRES .•. �` z 1: 12 a .'3 - w . - , ■. ; al.ca‘-* az...',7 4' -p,*_-......* - -.+'p -'s. o 4 ;•;t p-1 - C_ > I - 41 - Q ea Qi n q "-. _L FRONY AND REAR LOT Lri'ES SHALL I1Ai/E 0 © 0 iv O Rr r e 5.00 WIDE EASEMENT FOR 'HE FSAP'C1SiE OF I S) '4 ' jR - q qu '0! ScORM DFIAINAGE,SANITARY SEWER,POTABLE i , - -61003-'I►GGl6SS' - w o wcGES -.I CyJ --U,J - f � TER SUPPLY AN0 tlTtC%-`eS. , - ::vo 3a� f_ •Mao n z1' la so•�e.so'-., e•w-. �.le�`,a,•a,,.m. INiT _PQw r _ .all.11. 0' .-ZO.'DED3.CATsok) 2t)'=0°f:,�GATlOAS ? 1 s w - AVE-_-' __ CR_ so x _• v 3°zs.sc>.��� rtd '- 432 _ � � __,„- �.---r---°�- GRAH f -5' c.:,-, t✓...a 0 i s my M _._q,_ ¢a