The URL can be used to link to this page

SDR61-79 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. !,. ,,A .,.., /GI ain4..l.rn•b.,,.,.r 1..t,..J.. .,,,,,'..f d`_,..,n.,l.....,..,... ....o-,-,-:,..r,.,,,w..cd.,. ,.',..,..;,,�.,-,:.A„l:.,,,:.f..� • n, rw 11 1�',.; t..T'%r 1 A 71...t:.s s rill v n i G1 J - I, '5�wu'4yf'�•,,,” ,.' 7.'d''''''rr w .,..f l.,r,,,,a.6«" 4 ..4;:..,.»,+, �, fOH ,..,ALE fER/BURG `T VO '`RES'AUDIAN ' i l 11688'` 'SW �Pac fic :,Iwy.' SDR, 6'1 -7 = • T 'S1 36Gt Tax Lot 19Q0 s , ,� ` � .,1f1„c' .:A...,I...,:,w. ..',,,, .,__ .., „...,.... ,..,.+-, ;„, ....,a,...y.. .,. 1+:_rr_a w,u. I 1�. " I I I I I . I I , I ,4i , i , I , :f iy ✓ I 1 ■ , Y l . Yl , I , ■ I ,. , I'. I I , Y; l n • a j� • 2 • • • ,, • • • • •''f:"I ". .�''i.Ff**,",•t A ', r 9 �MI NW r 5 CITY OFTIGA RD ,ol n x,�� F O,Box 23397 J j O tt',,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,..,...,'"'''',,,,,,,,.....,,.,..,,,,,..t 12420 S.W.Main;Tigard,Oregon 97223 'r �u`f,"" : °•0 ,$'""4,, k,,,.,4 14,4 .. , Q /11 yb'rt k . . u /pi, , ♦s,.. fid 't''4 Mr.. Tec17ollrason 'Q NL 17913 Si W Pacific S�wy. r , ,.0 w 0 ' j. rp % Tigard; OR 97.!23 //1/( • • • I. • 1 • I. , . . o • 4 • o 1 0 f t ■ i f it i ■ 0 'iti t M �r , . • • • 1 r 104 / ie7STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5.2 • TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION August 5, 1980 - 7:30 p.m. TIGARD SCHOOL DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION OFFICES BOARD ROOM 13137 SW Pacific Highway, Tigard No submission. of material by a•plicant shall be made at the Public Hearing unless the applicant is requested to do so. Should this occur, the item will be Tabled until the following Hearing. • DOCKET: ZONE CHANGE, ZC 22-80 (Lasal Land Co. of NW/Marine Lumber Property) NPO #4 APPLICANT: Lasal Land Company of the Northwest OWNER: Mr•...:Stan McGrath C/O Bullier and Bullier Sheridan, Oregon 707 SW Washington Street Portland, Oregon 97205 r APPLICATION DATE: ' July 110 1980 SITE LOCATION: 11675 SW pacific Highway (Wash, Co. Tax Map 1S1 36CD, Tax Lots . • 1000 200, 300 & 1300) . Approximately 3.8 acres REQUEST: For a Zone Map Amendment from current C-3 "General Commercial" • and A-2 "Multifamily Residential" to City of Tigard Comprehensive • Plan designation of C-5 "Highway Commercial". STAFF NARRATIVE: Zone Ordinance Amendment, ZOA 4-80 passage by City Cotncil is expected on July 28, 1980 and has been approved by the Planning Commission. This property is in the C-5 Zone. Contemplated uses are those permitted in the Tigard Municipal Code and a Conditional Use for restaurant i8 a possibility at a later date. We have asked that a traffic light not be installed at Pfaffel and 99W in conjunction with the Transportation System Management Project (TSM) now bein.:1 constructed, but that the traffic light be placed at the intersection of 78th and 99W, This intersection will be created by this development. Applicant has agreed to dedicate the necessary tight-of-way and make the public improvements. Staff, Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), and the applicant will, make final adjustments at the Site Design •'; • Review stage. — I. FINDINGS OF VACT1 •• 9 1. Property is zoned C-6 Highway Commercial on the Tigard Comprehensive • Plan, NPO #4. 2. The extension of /8th Avenue at Pfaffle south across 95W to bartmouth has been planned through the NPO #4 prOCOg and has been approved by City , Coundil. The ODOT ha 8 full knowledge of our intent to constrUct thie street. . •, • k) 11 • , L, • • i k tt STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5.2'zC 22-80 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION August 5, 1980 • Page 2 P • 3. All proposed uses of this parcel are allowed''by Code. II. CONCLUSZONARY FINDINGS: I , 1. This Zone Change request is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. ! �: III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this Zone Change with the following conditions: • 1. All necessary street dedications and public improvements shall be made as deemed necessary by the Public Works Director. 2. Grading flans and construction plans on all public rights-of-way shall ,u' be submitted and approved by the Public Works Director prior to commence- merit of work. 3. Improvements may be bonded prior to issuance of Building Permits, however, all improvements shall be made prior to issuance of Occupancy Permits. 4. That street improvements be constructed to the approval of the Public I , Works Director prior to the recording of the final plat or issuance of Building Permits. I , • S. All existing or proposed utilities shall be placed underground. Street lighting installations shall be approved by the Public Works Director. 6. Project shall be subject to Site Design Review., 7. Oregon Department of Transportation shall submit a letter of approval for all Work done along 99W frontage. , ?TA/ • ? I I I , II • II # e ward. Planning' Director • • .... _ ..,.,._ ...r.r., „ k.. .;.t,-.,,.r;,-.,,,al i,:...u;,. .w..•.,_s........,.,.,...k.r..;.:, .:v,.c _,.,s... .,. ss,,..-,.J.a.:<, .,»....,...,..,il,.;».._ »_ i .-,,.,xi:, G ....,,Muu hqyA,St 1180 • Ta Planning Director, Aldie Howard, and the Tigard Planning Commissioners �T; If John Alexander, would appreciate the following letter to be read into` '? minutes of August 5, 1980, on the agenda for the re-zoning ng o,f the property formerly known as Marine Lumberyard. • questions are: • 1. Has the city staff made a specific condition for 'a street'that would intersect Pacific Highway's 2, If yes, Could it bisect Marine Lumberyard to Pfaffle Street 3. What would the name of the designated street be? Is there a proposed traffic signal light? 5. Has there been a study from the Oregon Department of Transportaion on traffic impact or any other private or government group0 1/ John Alexander n � S.W.W a St. 'E 3 igard,� Oregon 9722 � P , ,,• Pleas e s ee that a copy � this communications ons i8 placed a the Au gus t 5th h meetin g packet of each Commission n em bers.. • Or that a �e given toe�e� Planning Commission member prior to next S meeting. ■h' ,� �:„b, P 1 -�..w.rww-.w...wm....«++no:.:a�emwy •« , ..,., ,„ , ,..., ,. r n r •,, , lc A+MI nuwxil .ax,1 wMx,i..lfi.xk.+:w,iixr..rYWa/i ,�G•r W,4t+WnOUwiAi.MUlu.iA:.M/fiA'CM'utY6,M•• t„,:) V ' '�.,{ "§ P CEI TED r\,,\((0 NE J. + . W 1..A T G 0. Wes/ Jo lnsurence•Managing General Agents tAr,,( TELEPHONE(504 R26-6245 CC)NIMON'IvEAl..TTI BUILDING•PORTLAND.OREGON 97204 Ct ® Z�GARD 1 8 D' 8, 9 May 1980 y .r Ms. Doris Hartig 1, City Recorder city of Tigard P. O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 a g Boy of Ti Re: Alexander/Burger Bo � VS �C City Tigard . Dear Ms. Hartig: Leonard Adams I nv,urance Agency has send the above mentioned papers over to our off i t',e. After a brief review we have sent them over to Attorney Ronald E, Bailey of the Builivant, Wright firm. Mr. Bailey's telephone number is 228-6351 . • Sincerely, J. G. NEWMAN CO Edna Kastner (Mrs.) Claims Department ek cc: Leonard Adams Insurance , � r� . o %Ci,l j , LAW OFF ICES OH ar , 4 BLOOM, I UBEN, MARA.NI)AS & SLY SUITE 007 230ISE CASCADE BUILDING '} ri 2000 S. W.FOURTH AVENUE H r . ,,,,,,, PORTLAND. OREGON 07201 i;i 6, r TELEPHONE (503)224-0434 e s ' THEODORE, S. BLOOM NICK CHAIVOE :').C. S, JUAN S. MARANJ)AH May 1, 1980 I)OROTJIY M. MART.IND)AL E ' ALAN M, RUMEN OF" (:OUN:-II�L ; • RICHARD A.SLY li 4 City of Tigard ' Aldie Howard Mayor Alan Michelson ': Nancie Stumler 1 Kenneth Scheckla i; John E. Cook i,. Tom Bryian , c/o 12420 SW Main • • Tigard, Oregon r Re: Notice Under ORS 30. 275 • Sirs : Y - ti This office represents the legal interests of Mr. John D. Alexander: �' Pursuant to ORS 30. 275, John D. Alexander, dba Burger Boy Restaurant is notifying the City of Tigard, Oregon, an incorporated. City under the laws of the State of Oregon, that he is filing a claim 1. under ORS 30. 265, for the tortir.5us conduct of said City, to wit: 1. On December 3, 1979 , John D. Alexander and Burger Boy Restaurant applied for a zoning adjustment re 11688 S.W. Pacific Highway, Tigard, Oregon, Washington County tax map 151 36 CD, tax lot 1800 and 1900. ;i. ,, 2. On December 21, 1979 , the Site Design Review staff ;, r • report recommended approval of Mr. Alexander' s and Burger Boy Restaurant' s • request with sixteen specified conditions to, be net before a building permit would be issued. I;I 3. On January 24 , 1980 , Mr. Alexander andBurger Boy ,, Restaurant filed a Notice of Appeal with the City Recorder, City of 1�1 Tigard, Oregon. . ;r; '� 4. On Bebruar Y 7 , 1980 , John D. Alexander and Burger Boy f, Restaurant filed an Addendum to the above Appeal. `fir 5. On. a date uncertain, a staff report from the Tigard ,� Planning Department recommended denial of John D. Alexander' s and 6 Burger Boy Restaurant' s Appeal. u t ' orated i x 3 ~ r � action. g by referencs� ' I � 6: hereafter, a Sint was filed in Was x.n ors are �. enjoin s act n y Circuit Court to en oin the Cif ole tlex`e P P copies Y znco� ar all the documents and exhibits on file in } •s of which. 1"; . li}4 r 7 ' I I .... .,.._.. ...., ., .,„r ., .,,r.. r .., r. r. ..., r.,w. .•..r.... ..4.r... ti.•I,r,r..,.,r rr,..J ..,o.r..., .. rer..._r.........r.o-.,or.,r. r,r .. yr�, r l , , . . ...-... • ■ .. • , . , . * City of Tigard ' May 1, 1980 1 Aldie Howard Re: John Alex .mder . Mayor Alan Michelson Page 2 . Nancie Stumler Kenneth Scheckla John E. Cook ' , Tom Bryian •.1 , • . , ,• the City already has on file. • . . , .,, 7. John D. Alexander and Burger Boy Restaurant allege that t Mr. Aldie Howard and thus the City' s conduct was outside the scope of • ... 4 delegated authority and constituted a conspiracy by the City of Tigard, Aldie Howard and others , to deny the complaining party the use of his property. w , ' 8. John D. Alexander and Burger Boy Restaurant allege that , , , the denial of the variance request by the City of Tigard, Aldie Howard, and others, constituted an interferance with the complaining party' s i4 : business relationships and prospective business advantage. This was ;) done to force his cooperation with a proposed street reallignment 'of Dartmouth from 1-5 West through NPO #4 then North to Pfaffle across 99 West, which street allignment hasnever been formally approved by the City. 9. John D. Alexander and Burger Boy Restaurant allege, among other things, that the denial by the City of Tigard by and through — ' its planning department and its various representatives, is a product of an unauthorized exercise of official duties with the intent to benefit another -- in particular, private interests in violation of ' • State statute and Federal civil rights laws . , . 10 . John D. Alexander and Burger Boy Restaurant allege the denial is a conspiracy by the City of Tigard, through Aldie Howard, • and along with private interests , to intentionally interfere with the • complaining party' s business operations in an effort to force his cooperation with a proposed Dartmouth Street allignment of Dartmouth • . from 1-5 West, through NPO 04 then North to Pfaffle across 99 West. The above allegations are the result of numerous meetings, letters and phone conversations alleged to have taken place between Aldie Howard, Planning Director of the City of Tigard, by and on behalf of the city of Tigard, and others,which is now known to have begun on or about February of 1979 , in which plans, strategies, maps, impact studies, and other critical elements of the developmental plan were formulated without the complaining party' s knowledge or . . participation and, all to the complaining party' s detriment. , Out client has been damaged in the approximate amount of • $500 , 000. 00 by the actions of the City of Tigard, through its agents and employees for the interference with our client' s business relation- , ships by the alleged unauthorized exercise of official duties with the apparent intent to benefit private interests and the intentional interference with our client' s prospective advantage, ...,:. „,i_..:.._,.r, +,...,..:,.. ,.__i .,..,:. ...., ''.,.....,..,,., .i. ..„„_..,.,,« ..,._....,:... ,.. .a.....J.a, .... .. 5...+r_.-r..r.«..««-iG':Aian:..«.,,..M-,.4r,:......„.i...«...........uu:.,..:—.w.„uo.,..a,. ...• di M City of Tigard May 1, 1980 ` Aldie Howard Re: John Alexander Mayor Alan Michelson Page 3 Nancie Stumler Kenneth Scheckla John E. Cook Tom Bryian . Our client has also been damaged in the amount of $1,000 ,000.00 by the actions of the City of, Tigard, for the emotional distress and mental anguish suffered as a result of lost business opportunities, the prospect of his property and business being made worthless , and the feeling that there was a conspiracy to take property without just w 7: compensation. This does not, include any punitive damages which will be requested against the City as may be allowed by law and against the individuals involved for their intentional wrongdoing, which will be stated to exceed double the above sums. Very truly yours, , 1 • I • •' �•.'".L/ V.".w.4.•:w,F•+.I-+."'_Ww1'W`..uM.M•wwnYrwp.urruunuu.x J o HN S. MAI AN DA Si. JSMtbss cc : John Alexander . w CERTIFIED MAIL-RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED • '•i { it II „,.u... ..•................. ,...,....1.Wi...,.,...,,»....,..,...,,,.......r,ti,,r, ..,..w...,.,..,.,,,....,..., ,.,,., .. ...ro.+.«,,.,wr..n. im.:.a.xumaro„ C .,.t. .4 r 't „ .,_,., ,....., ,. :Ii-. r'- N.«'. -,t, 7•.-.. :i.,,' ,... .i,t, ,+. .,..C,..«. en,f T` x-A`.::.:."....,: ■ .j.a CIWOFTIRD WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON April :i',8, 1980 , Mr. John D. Alexander 11688 ;'SW Pacific Highway Tigard, Oregon 97223 REFERENCE: SITE DESIGN REVIEW, SDR 61-79 Dear Mr. Aleader Please be advised that the Tigard Planning Commission at their regular 1 . meeting ors, '1'4 9 15, 1 98n' tbl ead•your. appeal r an indefinite 4-+,`me, during V ti. ib Wi .T ....-- J„/ .�.✓ V -- .J M..►:' 4L a G4iL Ml.i.i N . which this case can be settled in the courts due to your suit against the ' City of 'Tigard. For any futher, information, please contact me at 639-4171, Tigard City Hall. Yours tr'11 y ► �,,�. A da ©ward b • 'nxaing Department AHvmc , .. I S W MAN PAD. 8'0X 233 12411.- 23397 `rlGARa, OREGON 9723 pH: 639-4171 -----------,-. d ty • • • 1a STAFF REPORT 5 AGENDA 5.1 i i TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION April 15, 1980 - 7:30 p.m. Fowler Junior High - Lecture Room 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard • DOCKET: SITE DESIGN REVIEW, SDR 61-79 (John Alexander/Burger Boy Appeal) APPLICANT: Mr. John' D. Alexander OWNER: SAME ' ' 11688 SW Pacific Highway Tigard, Oregon 97223 • y APPEAL DATE: February 7, 1980 SITE LOCATION: 11688 SW Pacific Highway (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 36CD, Tax Lot 1800 and 1900) REQUEST: Applicant wishes to appeal Planning Director's Conditions placed upon development of an addition to existing restaurant. PREVIOUS ACTION: 1) See SDB 61-79, Staff Report (Exhibit A) 2) See February 7, 1980 letter of appeal (Exhibit B) 3) See March 4, 1980 letter to Mr. Alexander from Planning Director (Exhibit C) STAFF 'RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny this appeal. !, The NPO #4 Plan clearly states that Dartmouth should connect to 99W. This Can only be accomplished through Tax Lot 1801 and additional 'right-of-;way is required ' from Tax Lot 1800 owned by Mr. Alexander. Hale, owner of Tax Lot 1700, is cooperating Mr. ?tin;ke, j Lot owner of Tax 1801, has agreed to dedicate his g e - ; " g a entire Lot for the a.mprovem�nt< , Marine Lumber has agreed to dedicate the necessary right-of-way to Pfaffle Street. If the Planning Commission denies this appeal, Mr. Alexander 'has the right to appeal to the City Council r � i Prepared and approved by 1-#oward, Planning nzrectox 1. AHvmc • • • rM r crR Y"d , � I � MINUTES TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION April 15, 1980 - 7:30 p.m. 1` Fowler Junior High School - Lecture Room 1 10865 SW Walnut St. - Tigard, Oregon . • President Tepedino OPENED the meeting at 7:35. ROLL CALL: Present: Bonn, Funk, Helmer, Herron, Kolleas, Smith, Speaker, i" Tepedino (. Absent: Popp }a. Staff: Howard The MINUTES of the March 18 meeting were considered, and on motion N, of Kolleas, seconded by Helmer, were unanimously approved as submitted. I � There were no COMMUNICATIONS either to staff or members of the Commission to be presented at this time, , • . • 1 The president opened the PUBLIC HEARINGS portion of the meeting w „ ' by reading the usual notice of authority for and procedure to be followed in, the meetings I, ! 5.1 SITE DESIGN REVIEW, SDR 61-79 (Alexander) NPO #k N', A request by John D. Alexander to appeal the Planninkf ' Director's Conditions placed upon development of an addition i 1 to existing restaurant located at 11688 SW Pacific Highway • r . (Wash. Co. Tax Map 151 °360D, Tax Lot 1800 and 1900). Howard reported that Mr, Alexander has filed suit again 3t the City ,' of Tigard on this matter. He therefore suggested tabling for an c''''44 indefinite time, during which this case cal: be settled in the courts, L Upon motion by Bonn, seconded by Helmer, SDR 61-79 Was unanimously • tabled. I • 5.2 ZONE O 'NA iE AMENDMENT ZOA,6-80 (Gity of Tigard) d� q by City of T 4ara for a Zone Or.diniance Text Are uest b tC for Ch ter Municipal.. .,Amendment � ;� of the ntial, Zones. Coda e • deleting R l5 Si�i 1 r8. 1� Reside Tigard Munz Ti al g �; ►.h � ( . Howard. explained bra. Ly the reason tor this ordinance amendt.nent; !' % and recommended it be ap �r ed by the Planning rdect do � .. V i.:ig Comrii�.ssion and ,y^ f c; or � to the City Council for. a. p,, on. There was no P, :tic T TI•,ONY. M 4 , MINUTES TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION April 15, 1980 Page 2 Se er moved approval of this amendm,nt as submitted, and that it be subm tted to the City Council or apoption. The motion was seconded by olleas and passed unanimous . 5n3a ZON, ORDINANCE AMENDMENT, ZtA 4-80 (City of Tigard) A request bl the City of Tigard or a Zone Ordinance Text Amendment f. Chapter 18.36 of he Tigard Municipal Code . relating to øe "Highway Comme. cial" (C-5) Zone. Howard explained the a,paren, limitations under the present ordinance on larger ,earcels deve oping with desirable transportation patterns. This amen.knent is an ttempt to encourage development in • larger units. PUBLIC TESTIMONY WS pre4ented by J. Be Bishop, 10505 SW Barbour Blvd., Portland. He qutio ;ed the advisability of requiring a maxi- , Nium lot coverage of only ', 5 per cent, pointing out considerably higher • lot coverages permitted i., ,.ther zones which raise the question of symmetry and consistency. ',Staff agreed with the reasoning. Smith suggested 50 per cent was a, little high, and staff proposed 40 percent, which was agreeable to t e iommisSion. Speaker raised the/quest on if it was intended to exclude medival offices from this zone Sinc'-, it was not, Sec. /8.36.010 (3) was • amended to: tIA.d1inispfrative, ',.rofessional, medical and general offices t ." Kali as MOVED ',pproval of the ordinance as amended to 40 ix,- cent lot cov age and i lusion of medical offices by the Commission and for ding to th City Council for adoption. The motion was seconded by He mer and carr ,=d unanimously. 5.3b ZONE iRDINANOE AMENDM , T, ZOA 5-80 (City of Tigard) A request by the City of Tig:, d for a Zone Ordinance Text Amendment for Chapter 18.32 o' the Tigard Municipal Code creatin. an additional Condit onal Use In the "Residential • Commercial" (C-4) Zone. HoWar briefly explained the riason for this additional Conditional Use. In ,iiscassion it was ascertai ed this use as a small animal • clinic w, a not pUrPoselY otitted fr 0 the permitted uses, and that because is a conditional use eacç case Would come before the Com.. . Mission for reVieW. • TLere Was no PUBLIC TESTIMONY, .• 7 230.96 , y 1 h�, J 223 19 X \', 'h!f ->t . '• .4 >- ' _ '' M M" � — -'' ,'� ��' 1 ;1 i' r ',�. Y /\ gip. 1 . , -- - .. 1 ' • r i'll I . ' / r 7: ; \\.\\ 7 ft. c Ei, i ,spa, T ' .'7'S''.--***----'• ........_ 1 it ` ..-4" ....Z04" . . / ,.." .-.;,", , /41,7. J' /'i'"��. 220,4 ,. 2,a, . ' .." •: - X ,. ----.?"(-.....,,,......,.... 1 /'.°°." ' t4:'7'''H'44C.4 411 I' ..•' e.'N....". , \ . ..."----.> .'".4 ''''.1"-m‘:.--"'-' ''; 1."-^-• --1-"`"*"," "" '' .2,,,-7 ,,e "14:0:/ PAVED (,/\.,.? - s.,„. 111(.,, , . (NV` , 77".<-....,,,, /it ..1-' . /7,..,Il I ,,./' 77V (M H) -:- ' .0 r- , . . \ i ";!--:--- - v , , ..k. �, PAVED , w ,' �. j ,::�/r CG7.+�,!�q �y ,ray I .� �� I ,,r a�l' • 1 f, v 2L3.ti/ ,'• 0 •t ,, 1f - •'S j ' ia . ' -- ' ' i .„,:ol i � � ' . . ” .4. ry � S:S a, ' '� s „..t.,....".443 .R.r"' , ? .' �1 ~ •4 l•, . ,F (f I H),,,,,/ - Gf , 7 e , ,a A^y'y / / I . . 2.7..":„,""10,,,,,,,...---'-'4"..7I'd 4/4110F/40 / / , ' . . . ,,,,,/ •-• Ac:..,...........„..),/ /77 ..!... :vizioir'to, - Nt )z,-,, ,-,..,..„345(in... _...,..... , , ... ,,...._ , ,,...,,,„... 2 \‘, , , . , • . , I t, i , I ► -(T \ 4 rt ! j a . t., ,ti,, �: f�1 Ire„. : ✓ C ,4 � ; . ..... f co.. 1-4, 1,4 4.4.--_,,, ,'..:-- .::: NI l',,,I,' • - • , , t ., . ' --'---"' .,' , • .,.. / i.,-. -7-1.' *, i „../ ;II „ .././„.„...,- "---;„...„.." I , - i i, . . ' 1 .„-----'7 . „ • 1 • .......,--' --.4--:.,, \ .,,,,,V''' 0 1yI a ' "'` _L:^µ' >„yif a h�at J+�f�i�+;r"Arr '-i4! I' � +.,2r.- :L W',,,.,,-,1..,•a{y. ".V:4 r y. D.4 i.LT ti'.,.., . y'3G�", ay�yr .ry''''•,,,..1...:*.-,..., -7:.. .;`Ke vT lf�+r ,w,.rti f`+1 C�•i;,.;',.,,�' .:27 ` ,, 5/;:mi�„ J ��, r't'. +y`,v ate+Y' ,y1u�u:". 4,'9Y1 �P'y .-'7.'.-'„i i'z i.^. 4 - Th J+.J s t p:.-0.-`rr�sn'.d„ -T!'ti'C•'ur.�.,"LT +S 1 1wk.o� .F.i ,: � , ,ry . Y Y y ``- •K"4 ;.....44-4, ^ 1 Yyi .1 ', 1 ,„, •itaY �'�t + awr , AG1 � . ,y"..aro` ti i'•t'E= .-' ' "'; F . ,�. 7 .a }.-",�- it�+� 'C!;;, t i .i•r+-o.,,,;w..r:....: -..-.^”" 4 to ,,•.t • r� ? � -,l,. w.,-�"rvxtZ"' 4�i.t•�r 1a1""�,�t►�iu�r" T' YSr..w� .aJ.y'nyi,�2,. .'. r:,x? „.ir.ri" r" ."V. 'is at,t,a•'M ."�.s r?',,= "`t•ro I•A r.i,"4.'". -=s► stY, *�r+ .r W- , . u.J. .I1. rM1.t..,}N�p r..:41,i, <�'"t L fit-' Ya�,, 4�::f 1,..?r�� ' 'i 1`Y�.�xs�!.: ■tyS r "7 «w'A•J�`3" -t1•w a 1 ....,-,-1 a ...-` ":am t, :;F.:;`,=`■" :'''-, a iYy� "i::.4'. . ?.; MT1v- ,W.; +s:1,F,k„4:it,*t,�1,:13a ; `� ti�«,,-w. ,-. Y ' ,.r,+..+ &,,, 11 "1y = ," „, .r` ,'3` ; yi,� ++Iw". , I' 1 � t.,;•;,, t Y N't . r+ z ,. Y k• w `� uyzoo ,4.••• etz w.4,trr✓ry:.1. � 4,4.f� 1 �;C w,4141f mo, '♦ .�� wi...,,,uif I 4.1.4,-.:>'r�`." Y;;r �i .'..7 . „ „. � .4( �'"!� � , .„ ,µ,41i ,p�"4�•�y, ,,r^�. r.iif� . y'� ,? rF .°n �r� .. f � .: �� _ -.iL:a", „ n' } Q • • • J9p 7 / 't ' 1 1 R 1 0 L'�F'i 1' t J i �';` ! , 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON RL (,Mtla. & ELECTIONS 2 FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHINGTON `1A iNG mUN Y 3JOHN D. ALEXANDER, and JOHN D. } . ALEXANDER dba BURGER 'BOY ) 4DRIVE--IN RESTAURANT, ) Plaintiffs, ) CASE 1'0: U�- 3 } 6 vs . ) RESTRAINING ORDER ) . ?CITY OF TIGARD, a municipal al } corporation, ALDIE HOWARD, Planning ) 8Director, MAYOR ALAN MICHELSON, ) Councilman NANCIE STUMLER, Councilman) 9KENNETH SCHECKI,A, Councilman JOHN E. ) "COOK, Councilman TOM BRYIAN, ) 10 ) Defendants. } 11, 12 BASED UPON the complaint and affidavit of the plaintiff on 13 film?, the court finds that because of impending in `ur dLstruction 14t° the property and rights of the plaintiff describ-d in the above 1(mentioned complaint and affidavit, there is probable cause to believe 16 that there is immediate and irreparable 1 os s tom he; llai 1 f and 17 IT IS ORDERED that the defendants are restrained as follows : w 18 1. From taking any action, further proceedings, or modifying 1,the roadway allignments of Dartmouth and Pfaffle streets as set forth in i ' /f ,, 2 p 20City Ordinance 73-9 , WPO X44 Plan, until plaintiff ..5:, :r:qu.est Te • ? , has been passed upon by the Site Design Review Board and such other ° 34 " 22 appeal bodies provided in City of Tigard ordinances; ' 2. From processing any matter through the Planning Commission 23 24 or the City Council which has to have been processes through the Site 25 Des ..g ` Review Board until plaintiff' s appeal before it is considered; n 26 3 prom conditioning plaintiff' s varianCe request upon the, Page 1 REST INING ORDER' ,..w .u,,,, a .a.•„ ,,,, u._w..r,W,...,.,.., ,,.,._.,. . .., •.,.,. ... . .. .. .. . .. „_ .,. , . ,� r rt •a • ' dedication of certain real property owned by plaintiff; . 2 4. From pzocessing Plaintiff's appeal of the variance request • „ 3through the Planning Commission; 4 5. From creating, altering, or modifying any existing City 5 of Tigard ordinance which would cause the reallignment of Dartmouth or 6Pfaf f le streets until this matter is ajudicated. ' 7 Dated this 4,5 day of April, 1.980. pp ,, 8 j .�L,f,4 01 C SI?G+Gtf ill-y- 4 9 10 • 11 , 12 13 14 , 15 , 16 l7 . tn 18 0-4a �.� , 41 '4' 4.4i 19 rye ' • a'a tS 1 GcP�ifi . 'fie �1 pri �n � L '..,!, 07-.0 20 ;r�rr rt ' � � aY ? �tlar a :13°t‘t , ,p, ki, 1,,,,,,s, , ‘,..42....4,,,, /s , 23 , : . P 24 . tl 25 - 26 w page. 2-RE5TMINlNG ORDER ', '/r i i u i. ,t f 1 • f •' b /_ ',a "i 0 k 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON a 2 ' FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHINGTON 3 JOHN D. ALEXANDER, and JOHN D. ) ALEXANDER dba BURGER BOY DRIVE- ) 4 IN RESTAURANT, ) S Plaintiffs, ) CASE NO: IfG—? ' 6 vs. ) COMPLAINT • ,u CITY OF TIGARD, a municipal ) 7 corporation, ALDIE nn iiig ) Director, MAYOR ALAY MICIETS ► r ) 8 Councilman NA\1C:IE ST, i 'R, ) • KENNETH SCHECKLA, Councilman JOHN E. ) • 9 COOK, Councilman TOM BRYIAN, ) ) ' 10 _ _ Defendants . ) 11 Plaintiffs allege : 12 FIRST CL' _M FOR RELIEF 13 1. At all times mentioned herein, ity of Tigard, Oregon, • . 14 was an incorporated city under the laws of th State of Oregon 15 2. At all times mentioned herein, ALDIE 30WARD was • 16 planning director for the City of Tigard, Oregon,. an incorporated a 17 city under the laws of the State. of Oregon. 18 3. • At all ntioned herein, MAYOR ALAN SCKELSON; . J�y y 5 h l 1y Councilman NANCIE STTJMLER, Councilman KENNETH SCHECKLA, Councilman M 0` 20 JOHN E. COOK, Councilman TOP BRYIA , were elected officials ":,4.'„, $'1,t,142421 comprom.ising the city coUncil **4117 the City of Tigard, Oregon, an, ; " 1 r 22 incorporated city under the laws of the State of Oregon:' ta°' 23 4. At all times mentioned herein, JOHN D ALEXANDER has been R the owner and So le proprietor of BURGER BOY RESTAURANT-L, 11688 r , 1168$ SW paclf�c'24 �• 25 Highway (Washington Coutny Tax Map i s1 36 CD., tax, 1800 and 1.900 r ' '• 26 Ciry of dig and, Oregon,on; an incorporated.ih corporator. city under the .laws o f 4:hn �4 Pao L COMPLAIN Y • Y • • 1 State of Oregon. 2 5. On December 3, 1979 , the plaintiffs , JOHN D. ALEXANDER : ' 3 and BURGER BOY RESTAURANT applied for a zoning adjustment. is 4 6. On December 21, 1979 , the Site Design Review staff R . 5 report recommended approval of plaintiffs' project with sixteen • 6 specified conditions to be met before a building permit would be 7 issued. See Exhibit "A" . 8 7, On January 24 , 1980 , the plaintiffs, JOHN D. ALEXANDER 9 and BURGER BOY RESTAURANT filed a notice of appeal with the City 10 Recorder, City of Tigard, Oregon. , t' 4 ; , j a • 11 • 8. On February 7 , 1980 , the plaintif. JOHN D. ALEXANDER 12 and BURGER BOY RESTAURANT filed a addendt i to the appeal as set 13 forth in paragraph VII herein. 71?-1002 / 6-17*;744-'4# erein. e !l4�# 14 9. On a date uncertain, a staff/report from the Tigard 15 Planning Department, signed by ALDIE HOWARD, Planning Director, 16 recommmerided the denial of Plaintiffs' appeal. See Exhibit "B" . 17 10. Plaintiffs' appeal is scheduled before the Planning g ,. 4 tb 18 Commission on April 15, 1980 . 12;iirieti54252 , I r a r a 19 11. Plaintiffs ' appeal would be a useless act and JOFIN D. ALEXANDER ands'. g BURGER BOJ.,RI.S`T ORAN, T thereby should have to exhaust ' • a ,� m a� $ aus admin 'le s,i �' � � a rtleda: x c r--141 .421� to prosecute this appeal, to wit: a' r W 0 w • `' M 4 H a1 22 a. On March 13, 1978, the City of Tigard, Oregon, 23 passed and approved ordinance 78-9 , 1TPO #4 Plan. See Exhibit, "C ;,4 ' b. As part of NPO 44 Plan, there was 'a section H 24 25 entitled Phased Developement of i w -� F the Street Plan i� which there are 26 four schematic drawings of proposed street plans realli gning Dartmouth ' , page 2-COMixtiNT 1 1.1 I ' ... :'.„.,' .. I a','. .. .J :... '. i .'.,.'a.._,.,, _.._, ...........l:x-.._.. ...... _n..,....a.L..,•.,_...J a,,........r ..._i.. ....Ix., .,..,x ...,I.r............ ..., ,a.. ......-.f.r.,ai.xlr...,-..iY.,....n...r. ...,..r..,.J,.....L...._.., .w...H.,.. . S 1 from I.5 West through NOP #4 then North to Pfaffle across 99W- 2 c. The drawing on page 15, figure 3 , Step 2 , of i; • 3 the above described plan designates the D rt outh connection as being 4 placed WEST of tax lots 1800 and l900. • 5 d. The above desced plan has not been changed i' • 6 by ordinance t,. 7 e. e pla ng director, ALDIE HOWARD, is • conditioning the riJ ''n r a building permit to plaintiffs on the • 8 .! g g ' g p p dedication of ?o ti n ., I plaintiffs ' tax lot 1800 . See, Exhibit "D'` . a' 10 f. dedication requested in the above paragraph I1 number "t s f r rip of land on the EAST side of tax lot 1800. • 12 g. The drawing described in paragraph "c" above, 13 specifically places the Dartmouth connection on the WEST side of 14 tax lot 1900. A27 ' 4 97 ' ZI 15 h. Dedication from Plaintiff is not required since •I 16 the Dartmouth connection is on the WEST side of tax lot 1900. . W 17 i. There being no legal basis for the dedication 13 requrested on the East side of plaintiffs ' property tax lot 1800, , y 8 1 .9 the defendants are atte k:e laintiff's property' without r n j ust com.sensation Amendments j r � �.n v�. oY� of �, 20 f ,the 5th and. 14th Am�.n nts of the Conststll�: bn b� t h i d Sta•Les f America and One,; ///,'� Eighteen of Constitution of the State of Oregon. � �� 22 Scctibn I g - :� the Co��.st3�•Lt , � a off N v- 12, Defendants, and, each of 'them. should be restrained' and 23 enjoined as follows, to wit: 24 25 a. From taking any action, further proceedings, pertaining to plaintiffs ' variance request or modifying the roadwa �6 Y ,, Page 3-COMPLAIN ' ixxr•iiJ lµri w li+lnm rri.l u'Im u w. r ', _, ' i, ,. ..„. ....e . . .I. ..., r. .... I • " alignments, of Dartmouth and Pfaffle streets as set forth in City 2 ordinance 89-9, NPO #4 Plan; 3 b. From creating, altering, or modifying any • 4 existing City of Tigard ordinance which would cause the realignment 5of Dartmouth or Pfaffle streets; 6 c. From conditioning plaintiffs' variance request ' 7upon the dedication of certain real property owned by plaintiffs 8for the purposes of constructing the proposed Dartmouth Street. • 9 d. From attempting to take plaintiffs ' property 10without just compensaticm. Plaintiffs further allege: X 12 SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF 13 13. Plaintiffs reallege paragraphs 1 through 12 , as if fully 14 set fo th herein. 15 14. The Municipal Code of the City of Tigard, Oregon, 18. 59 010 16proivded for a Site Design Review Board. See Exhibit "E" . 17 15. The Municipal Code of the City of Tigard, Oregon, 18. 59 .020 r 18 provides for a review process from an adverse decision of the planning P 1 ,jr r 1� director or his ageat. See Exhibit t "F" . r1 o 20 y 16. Defendants, CITY OF TIGARD, a municipal corporation, � m .afar 21 ALDIE HOWARD, Planning Director, MAYOR ALAN MICHELSON, Councilman , a; 41 x 22 NANCIE S�'UMLER, Councilman KENNETH SCHECKLA, Councilman JOHN E. COOT; atxa o'-( :,44, 14 23 and Councilman TOM BRYIAN, voted to abolish the Site Design Review 9,1 Board on or about March 11, 1900 . .4 24, 25 17. Plaintiffs ' appeal was pending before the Site De;sDesign 26 Review Board when said board was abolished • 4-COMPLAINT a, .. • 1 18. Defendants, CITY OF TIGARD, a municipal corporation, 2ALDIE, HOWARD, Planning Director, MAYOR ALAN MICHELSON, Councilman 3NANCIE STUMLER, Councilman KENNETH SCHECKLA, Councilman JOHN E. COOK, 4and Councilman TOM BRYIAN, on March 24 , 1980, adopted ordiance • 580-22 , City of Tigard, Oreogn, "amending 18. 59 . 020 and thereby alternating tithe appeal process . See Exhibit "H" . 7 19. Under the Site Design Review procedures, as set forth in gparagraph XIII herein, "the decision of the Design Review Board gshall be a final ordar. . . " . 18 ,59. 020 (d) . 10 20. Under the new ordinance, as set forth in paragraph XVI liher_ein, an appeal is made to the Plainnin Commission, a,nd from �7there to the City Council. Ordinance Number 80-22 . �(a , ,g07401/146 13 21. Plaintiffs ' rights on appeal have been substantially , 14affected as he is subjected to different appeal procedures set forth 13in paragraphs 17 and 18 herein, thus 'iolatin• •laintiffs' 15procedural due process rights , guaranteed b the 5th and 14th Amendments 17of the United States Constitution. , � 5 x 18 22. Defendants and each of them should be mandatorily w ti 7 1grequired to perform as follows, to wit: - 20 a. To rescind any action which terminated the R plaintiffs ' appeal 2�ex:�stence of the Site Design evze'w Board until plaintiffs '� !IhIgi22before it is considered; b. To process plaintiffs ' appeal of the variance 23 24re• st through the Site Design Review Board withou conditioning, g ue. oval on the de �� a. dedication of plaintiffs ' real w f�o' �� ' per p � property for proposed , Dar y tmouth Or contiguous . 25 ntxguou.s streets Page 5-COMPLAINT f 1 • u w • , . I 1 WHEREFORE, plaintiffs pray for a decree as follows : . 2 1. For plaintiffs' FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF: 3 a. Defendants, and each of them, should be ` . 1 • 4restrained and enjoined from taking any action, further proceedings, 5pertaining to plaintiffs ' variance request or modifying the roadway , , 5alignments of Dartmouth and Pfaffle streets as set forth in City 7ordinance 79-9, NPO #4 Plan; 8 b. Defendants , and eadh of them, should be dal g restrained and enjoined from creating, altering, or modifying any 1pexisting City of Tigard ordinance which would cause the 11realignment of Dartmouth or Pfaffle streets; Y2 c, Defendants , and each of them, should be • 13 restrained and enjoined from conditioning plaintiffs' -variance 14request upon the dedication of certain real property owned by, 15plaintiffs for the purposes of constructing the proposed Dartmouth 16Street; 17 d. Defendants , and eaph of them, should be 1 restrained and enjoined from attempting to take plaintiffs' property i 1, rat “ 19 without just compensation. 0? 20 2 . For plaintiffs ' SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIED: mx em should be ma a � � � � a. Defendants and each of� them x�d tor i.ly 5 wA 21 e � 0 'a required to rescind any action which` terminated the ekist�ence of the �` m w a P Site Design Review Eoard until plaintiffs ' app p eal before it is considered; o H 43 ri ob -24 b. Defendants and each of them shoutd�.be mandatorily- k 25required to process plaintiffs ' appear of the variance request 1 , ' , . � � ' 26through the Site Des i�n Review Board without conditioning any approval , • P G-COMPLAINT ti 1f . A l+t. • 1 on the dedicati_onof plaintiffs ' real property for proposed Dartmouth 2 or contiguous streets; 3 c. A decree for such other and further relief as 4,'the court may deem equitable and just, including costs and • 5clis.bursements along with a reasonable attorney' s fee. b DATED this /g' ..,,day of April, 1980. S. MAFZ1111N,DAS, BAR 66082 M g �� Atto ey for Plaintiffs 12 13 14 15 1,6 17 • r 18 a • a o" 20 oPZ 21 4i w 22 I•44 23 • 24 � 3 2 5 j 26 Page • e 7-COMPLAINT 4 � w "� • r r Q �.I • • v A vv . C • • • ,STAFF REPORT/SITE DESIGN REVIEW City of Tigard 12420 SW Main Street December 21, 1979 • DOCKET: Site Design Review, SDR 61-79, John Alexander/Burger Boy Restaurant 2 APPLICANT: Mr. John D. Alexander OWNER: Same 11688 SW Pacific Highway Tigard, Oregon 97223 SITE • LOCATION: 11688 SW Pacific Highway (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 36CD, Tax Lot 1900) ,1 SITE DEFIGNATION: C-3 "General Commercial" on 99W PARKING REQUIREMENTS: One (1) space per each 100 square feet of gross floor 'area. In this case, the applicant proposed to add to an existing building (1440 square feet) . The addition will be 960 square feet makin.:3 a total of 2400 square feet. Parking spaces required equal twenty four (24) . Applicant shows twenty seven (27) on site plan. SITE PLAN/DESIGN REVIEW COMNENTS: The most important aspect of this particular site is the fact that there is significant developable land to the south which must be served with transportation facilities in the near future. NPO 44 clearly outlines the need for a connection from the 1-5, Haines Road interchange west on Dartmouth Street across 72nd Avenue, then to the north to intersect with g9W. This property is the "key" to development of this proposed street system. • At this time, the property owner directly to the west (Robert Randall Company) , has approached Staff with a development proposal. This applicant' clearly understands the need for the NPO 44 street system and realizes that he Must cooperate with surrounding property owners and has agreed verbally to do so. 'Mr. Alexander, . in this case, has agreed verbally to cooperate also. One proposal is to bring the Darmouth extension to 99W through, between the Chalet Pancake House property and the Burger Boy Restatrant for a four way intersection with Pfaffle Street through the Marine Lumber Company property. At a meeting earlier this year with the people in this area, there was a great deal of ' discussion concerning this proposal. Since that time, Mr. cordon Martin has not • advanced his development plans for a large atount of property directly behind Mr. Alexander's property. staff still has the responsibility to carry through • with the NPO 44 plan for streets. staff's position is that the% Oregon Department Of Transportation must be satisfied • with any plans affecting 99W. Due to the fact that we now have adjoining property owners who wish to develoi5, it seems logical to suggest that the location of the , • 99W entry for property to the south be through Tax Lots 1800, 1801 and 1900_• Page 1 - Exhibit A • ' * • • . . , • . ,. • STAFF REPORT/SITE( SIGN REVIEW SDR 61-79 4 December 21, 1979 , • .. . Page 2 Staff is attempting here to formally notify this applicant that significant events in the future require that he dedicate a portion of his property for street improvements and share in the cost of these improvements. STAFF 1ECO2•MENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this project with the following conditions: 1. Property frontage along 997 be improved by adding sidewalks, curbs, gutters and storm drainage. Plans for all work in the public right-of-way shall be approved by the Public Works Director of Tigard. All work in the public right-of-way on 99W shall also be approved by Mr, Ron Xleinschmidt of the Oregon Departramt of Transportation, 238-7437, prior to issuance of Building • permits. '4 2. one curb cut on 99W shall be eliminated. One ingress/egress point shall remain and shall be thirty (30') feet wide with appropriate concrete aprons. p 4 3. The front landscaping area shall be ten (10') feet wide behind the sidewalk installation. Significant vegetation shall be installed to screen the parking lot from the Highway. Site plan to be revised to show screening. 4. Parking spaces along the boundaries .of the entire parking lot shall be curbed with cement. Site plan shall be revised to shOw two landscaped areas in the P' parking lot. This will provide a break in the large, asphalt visual areas. 5. The existing site sign is to be moved to the landscaped area in front of the building. No changes in the dimension of the sign will be allowed. When relocated, the existing sign shall not exceed fourteen (14' ) feet in . - height from the ground level. " . 6. Tire hydrant to be located not nore than 250 feet from buildings. • 7. All "Native vegetation" along southern property line is to be trimmed, thinned, • and area is to be improved with ground cover. Landscaping area to be added along northeast boundary. Changes to be shown on revised site plan. 8. Applicant to make required dedications, (ace rough description attached) and to sign a non-remonstrance agreement for future street improvements for the 1-5, Dartmouth to 99W Street System as outlined in the NPO 44 Plan prior to issuance of Building Permits. 9. Parking stalls on the reviSed site plan shall be visable, Traffic circulation ' arrows on asphalt shall be clearly Shown on revised site plan. • l0 No Occupancy Permits "shall be issued until all condition placed Upoh this development by the City of Tigard have been satisfied and inspecticins ' verifying this have been,carried ot by the appropriate department. • 11. No minor land partitions shall be made in reference to this projeCt unle58 • ±'Ormal aPplioation is. made to ,the City oE Tigard Plahning.Department and the . minor land Partition is approved and recorded. . If/ Page 2 - ExhiLi A ' . ' ( • i ;'I._ Ll ...'..i.�, ,, ,..,.J...,.li,,.,,1'k..,.,.0«.........,.., a,..-,.,«I,. J.n ,.-.-..,. i.ri,.. ..,. ,,:1... ,. , ,....GYM .w,,..... .,, i....i..♦u..G.l Ahwa:.......-SUS+.sa,F.,.,.ux nMnw.wus, i G' / " . STAFF REPORT/SITE DESIGN PEVIEW December 21, 1979 • Page3 12. No changes will be made to ao roved plans° or specifications unless formal apPlication is made to the appropriate City department and changes are approved by ,that department. Application for changes will be made i writing and shall irolude, applicable drawings, 13. Grading plans on all public ric:ht-of-ways shall be,submitted and approved , Mw by the Public Works Director prior to commencement of work. • 14. All existing or proposed utilities shall be placed underground. Street lighting installations shall be approved by the Public Works Director. 15. 1 the No 3u_Ld..r.g Permit shall b�. issued until the expiration of tn,, twe•hty day appeal period from the date of approval. , Improvements may be bonded prior to issuance, of Building Pere its. Prepared and approved by r �ir . NOTE: This acknowledgement must be signed and returned to the City of this Tigar d � Planning Department. Failure to return acknow edg� ent will I S t1 , in no fL.n-t:.her action on this r'roject: with regards to issuance of Buiadin"' Permits or engineering zc?roval. • Special. Note: Action of the Planning Director is final unless notification of • appeal to the Planning Commission is filed with the City Recorder within twenty (20) thy; of the Planning Director's Action. • • I i i 1 � e FXhlbi•t A / T ROUGH DESCRIPTION OF STREET DEDICATION I I • That portion of Tax Lot 1800 and 1900 151 36CD as follows, a 60 foot right--of--way, the center of which is the northerly extension of the east line of Palmer Acres a duly recorded subdivision in Washington County Oregon; the east and west line of ' said 60 foot right-of-way to extend northerly to the northeast line of said Tax Lot 1800. • • I , • ,/ • • • txhibi€ A ," • . .32X �69 � t°H ,.��'# Mt o � t t, t t n'•• •.• :�i 7 - j1, . :›I - ' ' \/ I y7 • / 11 7 i ii �,• 1 , \;* �';;, / rte/ \ • . '1 ,'N:,...,,::::ti,?ti.:.::::f.it,,,,,,,,,,,,..,t4 ,yam •`' "t • 7 i I ', -''' � ,/'�. ,,� 220.E ' "PI . / . •• :..,.., ,,,,...•-• .,. iii ,,4), • • C\77::' , . • - , . ''''''''') r.i..,..„..._ ,.......\ 1: i--- v=im . 1 R t�l -/ _;f1' „� e „r ' ." t r.., ,, ,,/ ......D rr't-�-�'�'' „'i-f `� r PAVED '., ! ;,.. i • •'� �ti 1 / ! ' \ rt P A V E B 17.,.e' ' \,,,,,) *,.... i,; * 1!!LD.II .,.. ..ri./fi ,,,:tr":„, (M H) ,1 , se.,\ I) • ), .\ '...:"''. /1 17--- ------""7------ « , , ,..,,,-;,..A.,..,41 ,,,.. .,.. \,,i I 1(r. L i .,l z ,,c/,‘<,1'\ , \ I/ A q'Er) z\..4.,i • Ns , ..1. e!.41 1.,. "is‘, \I i. ".74:%45,=• ,,). .. ''.''')‘ 1 ,P7.>%."" • CB. ,i //,,,,i, \ '.■ • ... ..,,... 7 r/.,..., ,,A----. C._..),,,, , ,.... ,..:.-;.• ...t -,,, .,.. r ,r,r/. ^ A. �J" t•,,, ,4,-„y,,:i*y,e?...goik'w,;2mfr..r,1"N uHx.+IV� �. �'=S;Vi 1n=:,•.•.1.7477, 90.:�',A ✓' 'r_ ...4-,-:re.'" ; ` f / f 1 :A ✓, »y.i ,�,,/�y,•,,,"1....•,..`� `t+41....... „Nr•`��y�., .:∎.,�.. .7.!...ev...{�.,i.�hl4.1,i4.i4' ,n • r/ F,/ �"`s ..,w,M•■j,h,try„^'.c.;M'.,.;W�+.,••++Y;i:" ,...: '4N.y."1: ..wi: ,W� t"'S• tt..`r ✓� "H��/', r 't•;!� +`.�,�y.. .• ;.� r/• ,•r�.„r / ,• l"'"^'^” I J^ .J,Y .,' .t,,,,, \� � ,' f •/'N'J,.•'"' •IY�I'1'., ,•R.Y„yiN-,,•' , !• w.d/'' '•"f,» '•"+•A " '� `„J''•..- .w� loaq: • • 27.b ( / `"" f= 7 /fir S ii ti / ' „c. ...)N )40 j.;,,,,., 1 --. v -4-1:7).74.— ■ ..„.„.,..-„1: ./ 0 --r-T B / \ ,, i I ...)21 ' .' ) ! "":7,,,<-;.:4' 1 I 0 '":"" ..., t„,.- _ •.-.:,•-- /� !yam ' .� r "' X - , t ) , t "7„.....„.„..„,------ i �.•'+ 1-- � �� > r �,�, gyp, ^ '� .I ''J, ,..l_r- .. 6.•''''''''':,2„,/ ,,,, , _._ , .,': ' • i, , ... , , ' "^.• ''f.v,v L, �•4'„ � �:,' •• !r+N�.::, ,� r - - r , ', r r - r i A d '� r '.rte • r tVi�t', 4 iW ! + , . ., ,1�` ".. . ..".•-+ ir , y � r` 4.1r� fy rvjff r e � ^ L ' L :: • * V � LLt� s tf r" F t' "W �• ' w... ..v..a..•., ,....x fi4r l,.'✓ + ftr.:Jy�Y: .� �":"..0-'ii s'Ae�..ly',iY,,4 Y:, p Cf •ht y y - p� , ,. •.' a 4 w e: tri i w . I ' .a °7 4 .vR- "::.f f.'.i.4 'av 7 i. 4,.4T.;:;44...1 +1�1'. �;�!:..�r,•�Yyf.f rVyttlr •• J n t+'.I"t r ' r•;i v,4' 'i A ' ,r-.1 , . ,. ; ^0'' ,�.3.�� jv P1 � .w .t ,j7.:{ '•>rsp: �Jg, ; fn`� C, :tr'�1y, ••-,.:. ; n• '"' 1 V ti d 1! '•y P.•i'. >Y.�}✓1F�k r! .t• yv y i''^ "L iL 4,;;;?•S„lf .Vi�:�rty.r 4i �1-')..r,L�..3%'"J t !-��..y,, I• � J .� i 1. .!± , ' 4 .ir.r•w;+/4r t i'rr: ✓ t� 14'Y"Ar f ry�Y 3.{w `t ,r::.a:+iH�r«'^fi•,� ?'. . i Lrj:'�* "('��et-k4,4)19, �'1!:1ii Z ,'� , • :y+ .,� .., T ._ •:`Yr jy,.A NH }Z1� � A 1+f fF±j1'ti•rt"�f�"�., �• N r y�Tit 4 te t�_ •;k'-• f.`,' + r Yrfti'4t L:".rY,' "I'4+ri,� tt--,-1, 4�, + I,.�. F„-,� . • • e*,, ,%. k.-'C'4t. .«a,>r 'e `•.0...a» r".'��Y'f R° F,i ) , µ'Y.•w 4 d/hti 1�1"+C }y•,,,.l`_y4 : ,isk i?Y' � � ;.;«.tK y,,t�is;•,�{1'1.n✓yF1y.^1 1 54..,tMhy'f.:•«✓4� ,.1•1.;-i:;YG4x:.l.:ky a. „j1'4��, �::\.t`,C' . lY�::r•�`f•�'4..!:♦:s.•k.'pi,''.✓,,i1,1;• 0.a3'! 4•lCa..4."..�Jv..,4i1+4•0� Cti'�:.1' ��, iA .:.-. ,, .,^.....,., r.•nrav ixr.n..,,.,n...v u . a. . . ; ) ' ' .. , : . . ' „/” r _...., -. , ., ,........_.,. ....... .......+.,•..,r_.,,. ._xr..',...-,A •,-...... .,rA.«....s.rl..'....».._....r... ....A.,,.a_•:,...,._.N ,.a»..ra,_• ,.tl,...,.a, .ui,...«.-..,u.-,r »...,....»»..r.•1« .+•a;.�w,..,...•::.:w.+ra • • STAFF' REPORT AGENDA 5.1 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION M April 15, 1980 7:30 p.m. Fowler Junior. High Lecture Room • 9 a $ 10 65 W S Wan t Walnut Street, Tigard g rd DOC4: SITE DESIGN ,REVIEW, SDR 61M°79 (John Alexander/Burger Boy Appeal) ,r APPLICANT: Mr. John D. Alexander OWNER: SAME 11688 SW Pacific Highway Tigard, Oregon 97223 APPEAL DATE: February 7, 1980 SITE LOCATION: 11688 $W Pacific Highway (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1Si'' 36CD, Tax Lot.' 1800 and 1900) REQUEST: Applicant wishes to appeal Planning Director's Conditions placed; upon development of an addition to existing restaurant PREVIOUS ACTION: 1) See SDR 61-79, Staff Report (Exhibit A) 2) See February 7, 1980 letter of appeal (Exhibit B) 3) See March 4, 1980 letter to Mr. Alexander from Planning Director (Exhibit C) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: • Staff recoil lends that the Planning Commission deny this 'appeal: The NPO #4 Plan clearly statifhoiat Dartmouth should connect to 991. This can �n only be accomplished through-Tax Lot 1801 and additional right--of-way is required from Tax Lot 1800 owned by qtr. Alexander.,....., rt'w o r• d,; s rz 4.1t- c 0 Mr. Hale, owner of Tax Lot 1700, iS cooperating: Mr. Finke, owner of Tax Lot 1801, has agreed to dedicate his entire Lot for the improvement. Marine Lumber has ageed to dedicate the necessary right-of-way to Pfaffle Street: If the Planning Commission denies this appeal, Mr. Alexander has the right, to appeal to the City Council: .., Prepared and approved b y �owar dd , Planning Director • AHv'mc a EXhibits-B r . . w - wM 1 i i Wal M1+t' r N N .< r i l 1. a J w x. ..:-.,,r_.».. ..+...n:.-:.W-',r..4r�. .r......ru.,....r.ai..c.n: .e,..m. w....•,..r.«.,r i! .'Tr...•,wr'T. .,M,.1,w.1`r � .. 1. •4 4+t.F.. ..,„' ,.::,-. 1 , Mw.n.w•NrM''11++>rax,:ew.cet3c. • " a • • A .. p is (. l; " ADOPTED . NPO 1/4 PLAN TEXT �. TFIE PLAN The following plan narrative describes the intentions of the Neighborhood plan- ning Organization and c,he City of Tigard with respect to the future develop- went of this Neighborhood. It is a "policies plan" providing guidelines for - development in the form of policy statements. These policies, the 'accompany'ing . _ . text, and the plan map are to be consulted jointly when evaluating development proposals, changes in the street system, or any proposal requiring public agency - , review. This plan is a means of guiding development in order to achieve desired purposes or goals . This section, t:hr,}refore, begins with the statement of goals provided in the city-ride Tigard Comitiunity,'Plan" These goals provide the basis and describe the broad purposes s of the Neighborhood planning effort and have been included in • • this plan in their Entirety. The Neighborhood is a portion of the larger Tigard ,. Community and these goals serve to relate this part to the whole. • ,� C,Cl_LS IF RQM THE TigkR0,_CQMMTINITY PLAN (As adopted i. i_1971.) . ' ` 1. The city intends to limit the ultimate population of the -rapping area. The comprehensive plan provides for a maximum population of around 73,000 people. There are four categories of residential density, ranging from a suburban density of two families per acre to a high in selected areas of up to 40 • families per acre. This range of residential densities is intended to provide a variety of living environments that will accommodate the housing • needs of different family size and income. The density of population in- : f lutiences the character of residential areas and determines the demand for public facilities and services in different parts of the city. The citizens of the community should know the density of development that is planned for • different parts of the city as it affects their own neighborhoods. City officials need to know the demands for different public facilities and • services in different parts of the city. ;;;; • A 2. The comprehensive plan recognizes the established character of existiir.g neighborhoods and seeks to preserve and enhance existing neighborhood values. .Future development proposals should be sensitive to the concern of 'citizens for their own immediate environment as well as to the well being f of the city as a wholes . A. 3. The comprehensive plan takes advantage of the natural features that give Tigard - , _ distinctive character and quality. These include topographic' futures such as Bull. Mountain, Little Bull :Mountain and Fenno Creek: Fenno Creek and its tribUta ry streams provide natural drainage way s and make possible a system of greenways connecting various parts of the city. ° The comprehen,sive - plan recognizes the potential of greenways in enhancing the livability of , 0, the community. The implementation of a greenway system 18 a tiiajor element ' ' of the Tigard comprehensive plan. i 1 Pag 1 fxh ibit C I ` . • • • 4 . i Leavy traffic is nog y, smelly , and dangerous. It conflicts with residential 0 values and with many of the other activities within the city.. Therefore, b. major traffic routes need to be designed and located in a manner that will, minimize these inherent conflicts, at the same time allowing motorists to reach their destinations quickly and safely. The comprehensive plan. provides for improvements in the traffic system. It designates streets and ': highways by category, and it sets standards for their design. The major street pattern indicated in the comprehensive plan will give notice as to hove the city intends to route major traffic volumes in the, future • 5. ' Convenience is a major objective in locating shopping facilities and • _ � . others busx.nEsses. .t the same time, their locati.on shoul.d not confl.i.ct:' wit:h 4, res�identi al areas: o,r create unnecessary traffic congestion. Ti.gaa:d does not have a "central business district" in, the sense that a very,large� proportion of its stores and other businesses are concentrated in the central location. The comprehensive plan seeks a is tribution of nei.gh yl borhoo d and community shopping centers in locations that are easily accessible to the areas they serve. These shopping centers will be designed in a manner that will minimze land use and, traffic ffic conflicts.' [ j 6, There is still an abundance of vacant land in the Tigard area that has potential for industrial development and the comprehensive plan is designed to encourage its use for this purpose. An ob jectivp of the plan is to create employment opportunities within the com.lunity for those P plan I? persons who live there, The Ilan also recognizes the importance of s. balanced tax base in supporting necessary Lommunity facilities and • services . Regulations set for industrial development will insure high • • standards that are in the, interest of industry and the city as a whole 14 7. The location of schools and parks affects the livability of Tigard's residential neighborhoods. Youngsters in the elementary grades should be able to walk to school and should not have to. cross busy streets Where possible parks and schools should be developed on ad'jacent sites tied to the greenway system. While the patterns of existing development and the t-epography do not always permit an ideal arrangement of schools and, I parks, the comprehensive plan will assist the community to approach this objective. • I Page 2 - ry . I 1 I n u+ 1 I,,,. ^ .., ,,...'•,,.,.. , 1 .., 1^ _-r......,w......+nwr+.runlwurwixrmulc-ut0 . I, I I .. «1, ., ..,., 9 ' )1 P � • M ,• a ' Np 1 Figure, 1 indicates the circulation system and the expected average weekday traffic volumes when the Neighborhood is fully developed according to the land uses designated on the plan map. The future estimated traffic assignment for Alternative) 1 is shown on figure 2: The existing street system is inadequate to serve the future traffic needs to the neighborhood. The primary deficiencies occur in the Triangle where the proposed business development creates the need for a continuous stiect,systcri . with higl•t capacity connections to the adjacent freeways and Pacific Highway. Alternative 2 • . The second alternative proposes a street system designed to carry projected future traffic volumes and to provide adequate vehicular access to all properties located wi thin the neighborhood. The most notable features are a connection of Pfaffie ', and Dartmouth to form a major east-west link between Pacific. Highway and 1-5 and a loop street which would provide access to the land west of 72nd. • PHASED DEVELOPMENT OF THE STREET PLAN • , . Constructidn of the proposed street system represents the most ,subst_antial public facilities costs which further development of the neighborhood require, The • • most. efficient method of constructing this system is in phases as development oc- curs. Therefore, development will be permitted in those portions of the neigh-- ( boyhood where the street system has been improved to meet the increased traffic demands. This phasing of development to coincide with the provision of adequate streets will assure that the traffic demands resulting from further development will not exceed the carrying capacity of the street system. Polity 32. The rezoning of property to more intensive uses (or City design approval of projects on previously rezoned properties) will only be per- mitted on parcels served by a street improved to urban standards. The street must be fully improved from the subject parcel to the nearest freeway interchange or Pacific Highway connection. The primary implication of Policy 32 is that the separate property owners will have to work cooperatively toward upgrading the streets serving their properties..' This can be accomplished by the local improvement district process which qualifies the property owners for low interest, long-term financing. In addition, retirement of the bonds sold to finance the street inpro:Yements could come from the proceeds of the tax Increment financing method discussed on the following page. I I. The phasing sequence is displayed on figures 3 an:.!. 4. While the intent is to match development to a street improvement sequence, it does not forestall the develop- j. meet occurring; out of sequence providing that the necessary street improvements are oft'made. For instancy; one or.mor more property�owners may shoo e to be•t the`costa those street improvements which would qualify their property for immediate development. However, the phasing sequence will be used as the basis for pr.bgrarce capital improvements Which are publicly fuhded • The P ir a phrase i eti��t�re s treet IS stem : refers to the present rerent s treed pattern n .and not the phis1 :r condition ion of those streets. r -�° Exhibit 0 • . I d ' • - --- i.. - - i•, ..„,........•.,-. .•a:'i,.....„::1 , 1.7.? .,_�..t: .\�r7. -'a.... .. ,---.i..-.r,.,�,. -•_-_,,. ..,.-,-- - - - ...-.- .--..w-<°.V.,. '--� -- �..±=,..-....'_.s... -;.-,- -.- -- - __::4 101,1 i \N...,, i t_tr,,iet' (""� ,.v ..-, i,. (.y...'..,„..-1= •�1 _ ,- 'Sf a • -- •9 ,t r-r t ... • . :� L• ,-•+1 -'--I 1'}.r--t,j N. ^)r //.� �Jf e - - - - k. -' i ce....,:•••1'..� .`.....} 1,.+••q'.-.1- tr...a,,e..o_-..---; 1•,-.•l id C /�./'.i:Y- _ - _ - - - - - - - _ __- - 'V; - a. �'.7. • • - 1, .i rr■ : oh r �r v_., t •,....1,..,•./..:k,•'AT"...111 -,t �'. .[v- - - - _ - - - - -- - --_- tt ' . , : t a; "� s j( r' `�_ti» . s . Llt I. - . - -., N t.l - _ r,, 1_"',. tit ,.f:r _ - - ♦_ +�: vttl K} tii j .t1 1 j'j 1 a t ‘,("'N - ..�...-r�..r e+yr.int. .v.L.��t..'.. �� t4}?[ jrf*rt',[r�j(/ - - - -__ _ -_ _ i - - - --`-- - - - - I k1 t:".1 1�y.,t°�-.• • ___ •li•t[-a.,ir• X14,Y _,' IJ •.'!3l .,f"•tai ..t.1�.....��..�•. - - _-- _ _ _ - " - __ - _ . ;Ri :e•rs...w..4Jrl. -} 1•+i-«:.....1 -1 .,. - tua+ia,. 1�:';;. iitr�a 4 r 41 / r r, . f ti`1t0Y` t,.. . . r i I. •-«�[[\i -- :ik. - - _ --- _ - _a� P. -.i•_,•y - ~fry - - - - - -- - - - - -- _ -- ' _ - _ - _ - _ -- _ - - • _ - - . -_ - - -•- - _ - - at . - - ,ip\�- - -1� - 'r_ '� -� •ti�!1-N t 1 _ - .- - - - - -_ - - _ -- _ - - - - 5��i':d _ ;}� ��r•:.y+ -__ �---.� ..---^•[`r-,°.' ,,,7„x:.,r,'f„„ ,* ..mom' 1 ;k{'! _` .:t1 '• .*rt.. ."" - --..11.7 .. .,- r-- ..'•'..rl:i'+a :•7 1•.=''.4'1 t r''•' i.�:i..t. t. • .t,..:' 2.s.•-- '-'� I - tY t ,4i...,';4:7 .! ,., .� Y!' 1 ..�-� ".1i": t _ a''„.1„,...:.,...i.,,,„_.,S� t,y. � 'i4._.i,�.•,:�. ,. - - J t• - ` -- n _ - - =i-_ .'.. - _ -. _ - _ r 3 -i;• - ) .a •`:f.. .•. •+ti--- i .-[t�s'. .- ' ,� ,.444.. - •� _ 'ti t _ _ �• �• �• -.•••.?1 L. �•-..."--;42.7 t ,r ��•- .,. � �'Y [ : •�, t - `.,•. hty,.:: : _ .1 ..s , _ ,:tits «c.�. i 1: `+-- v + ,.-..=_.Z;3i"_ r , , =_=---'---44,-,� -. iF P1.►[�i_ t 1,,:i - - _ ,5:..' - - _-- tk'i _ - 1t \ y A ri t-jny�{j��{;�ji�� ii ti�� t� rE�ri:-•-T - - ti!' S ,,J-{..»y.`tL^t'K�t -i/�_..? •-' { _, 4 i. -, - - - i i t_ _ l:i�- ,,,,:\•• ,.�.� ]!•_ - iC:Sr t:�_ - _-- -- - - - ,`� L«.a!t - , - -tYi - _- _1; _ sJ`-+1.i-1) .�.tj.-,i --.-..�.t1 ,..�.. (t ii•._r••,.-:i,•T j15--,--;,„+.R- _ - - - - - - - t.1!!.....•1 - - - _ii r i ,� ..,..1•11_, - ,,\- _ - - _ -_ - 1.`.., - C•7 �+ r 1 1t .i..-J•r 1:1-n .t•-•.t .t .,t.Y:.�•'i..'.t. ., ,,WrMt i�t't _ - 1. •..1`�.]nt t•tt 'a 1 ik *{t`• :•.:._ _ l*}Pt'� ./' -1-1-..1,.•.� -• ••�=_—.1 1 [ �1-•i-4a' •” - •N �ti `a'f't},—)1.,•,',--..-,•;-- •bt 'v,.rr+ ' ,- � t / Y-- - - - hi • >' - _ - v\:•!• .,f.„• ./`-• • , _ •'"" - - _ '_ = i. ,-..t --- ;t Q i '-t-1�- t ,,Y.- ,1-....--11:, -----.----4T11,-..--. .„ . 2 - - -. f _ r-:.,� ' « •1 t • _ -- _ I i i).. : tzr - _ \``tt�+t: ( (r zi tr' -i �1 x,.,._�` ii '�'t- t ----1'°.-",1S '"';.`#iey i-•:- ..•: err_�• c. �. .�l� - - 't ri I r t ' ♦:1 a�J- _ (� F.i �"-.._..%, -- t.`L� 1' tlny ..; �.-.rr�.r.L=,�;..•'•`t �,.�.��I:•,-n.-..../!.y -tl .� t••,1•. - - _•° - h _ .ti _ ;tit - - i1-.1„ •.r1 t - - -U `c ,,,• _ E.1•, -SitxJ...Xli- Ni-.uw"s- 42..-r•'',L.iiw.ri...••:4 s,•'..`.j,:. -�_ -.4= . __ ' ' - •." - 1k1- .'Z - - .. ::•- s - - _ - - .-.I. ~ r ail - A'i - =}'ti °7t Y .ri,;jj T om_ _ ,. n� Ay }- - ,�_ --Jtj }•. r.' ca. �? _ jr ' ,..„ `1ls r - =T1=R� c.. - t t ///,f.:-' .,n'!:: i {-•- -tfi __ j/ r•� r _ _ _ -� I ri ;" a -- ja� z- „., ,V - iv, t.2 -_ z.J - -; - -./j .� tlSt,- J Y ` t.. 1 [S 1... 1 j _.! } Y:�- 7a t+ I i j 't. '�a �I 1 �Cri �� „_s t ��-.-,..� 4 'a[�'i r'�.. L A 1 ^r t.. !.. jj;.,� ! ,.us.r\-:'ic-t_3t..:r.::-.4..441-'i.�t:J.s...-.-;,-rj .1-0I t.tiii+' e2t ,.• (_ _-`/_ Q�, .,i t ' • \1, at:, ? ,;t'dt.a..�rsaGrc .r1�'��2,... 5,� s t• { (�l,J' s/��i`� ,�� "ct t r1 :k ,z ,=1, 4 ,,..:_zr __...,,,,7t---::;-:2,=" —I 11. it --,.., _••l_ .f•.—c.i ..1 ;,,ri•,±is' . k}1 1,,k.+1t�-,;�:` - _ .T 4t.. -` :r t /1 '`aj� 7�_.t- r-( - - YtukE1'aJ.�} .w 1 -- j-» ,-"t A11 �}{ - - I I�.-.�`,.., M l.. - _ _ 1' - •a,t i /1;""- -�. - �.,,-J . _ t i t i• lJr. - ,i n l :t 11-A'=t S .� �r Jt„ ?{ ,:1-.;_; ,1 _ 'r 1/j' i _; 5�.. iaNi.L.;'•w.a.t[.::kt•pt _ /Ji«Y _- -,-1 T"-''T•J '_7; - fJ - - - - ..,..i ..�.J r 1' ''� :, - r.1.•,}k- - ' -r'-! _ { •- _ \,,,L` a i l S - t "-- , � ; a[17•- - „ 0.' � "` a'3 -- N._��"!=.:_" f 4u''J - -_7} j jrT k,a - - AJ i,�h jk ;3 ;1;$n 1—.:./,''T)-.1--,..71: -., - -- -_ ' [- -t 1i !, r j t - - ' -,. - -- - ..ti i.0 . t-:` — , fif - _ -_! ,- - - -. a f r [rF j -. p i.� - f • � : - - - i_.11--..; rY - a- . I i`l:�* - � � _ - '01_ - Q 1 Al t of - •t 1 Ki . 'I;/ ._ °5,+ 1 P J- �i 1 To. s - i� y If t Ir., j t i t i - 4,4 .j i f 1,.. :•si I 1••.'s - • - L - 1-i '-i .._.-J�'j:'!=•b-.0..;•-,:-.--P,:.•r:1�.[1=_ •'�CiJ- It `.; 'r'.'t:+ `t}.�+ ` ••'.t!tL/th21ir ,1f*•' t••• a1•i ilL f-•� ahli •�jA4 ', t 1if-31;a 17-----...:,'•'5' --'. II .c'-' t 4 f.. 1 _ ,-.44.4.4‘ , __ . 4' 1 (:4, 1 riVi-' -C- 9) ON',1 1 1 L .1 -,...t,....,• t 4,'1 a 1r, ri �444-- i tt/I `s• z f • J- 4 I k L. ________ --i , „i. ( '. , , irlf ' ■4,..i'r I- . . , ' •11V-teZt'...2,*, . ;;;J:Itiltt.irt. ' . ,-ry• 1.. .179 , ■ . . 1.4 ,H •..%11 art Oral F,rvA RD ......,0 . • . wAsHING-ToN COUNTY,OREGON March 4, 1980 -, . • . . ./ . . ' . . , . . • I . . Mr. John D. Zaexander . 11688 SW Pacific Highway . Tigard, Oregon 97223 _ . . . . : Referetce; SITE DESIGN REVIEW, SDR 61-79, Burger Boy Restaurant , . . . . , Dear Mx. Alexander; In your letter dated February 7, 1980 - Appeal of conditions outlined in $ Site Design Review, SDR 61-79, Staff Report - you mention Condition • Note that this condition is very "general" in relation to necessary dedications . along your eastern boundary. We would like to obtain seventyfive (75') , . • • feet total right-of-way for the construction of the Dartmouth extension- At this time, it appears that Mr. Finke and Mr. Hale have provided sixty . . ., 5 (60') feet. Therefore, we would like to acquire the additional fifteen (15') feet from you or approximately three thousand (3,000) square feet of your total 23,086 square feet. It is my feeling that the construction of the Dartmouth extension and the * installation of 'traffic signal Will enhance your property Significantly. . I suggest that we are not being confiscatory. All new construction in this -, • . City i8 required to dedicate necessary right-of-way for streets, if,that , • . right-of-way does not exist now. It your particular case, you will be asked ' • to join in a Local Improvement District (L.T.D.) and pay your fair Share of , the costs to construct he Dartmouth extension. . 1 ' , Condition #2 is a condition the City has applied to other similar situations . , , ., • to improve the safety on 99W. In this particular instance, you will benefit , again from the exposure to Dartmouth and a signalized intersection on 99W1 Obviously, you may want to change your entire traffic pattern if and when Dartmouth is constructed. ,-, Condition #4 can be eliminated. My attempt was to break-up the larger asphalt area and enhance the aesthetic appeal of your property, X would not insist • on this condition. We have been contacted by the developers of the Marine XJumber property.to your north, • They are seriously 'considering the deGication'of the necessary • . • . . . , riftght-of-Way to dorinocC-Darbtiotrt-Ir to PZaffel. This, will allow a 4-way intex$sotiazi at 99W. The Randall Company and Mr. Fine have tentatively agreed to the • Dartmouth alignment. In short, Mr, Alexander, we axe approaching the final ' • stages of the Dartmouth aligntent. ----'--- 1242b .W. MAN ' ,O,,8C5X 237 TIGARD, ORMON 97223 t14: 9-4171• ^ ' H Page 1 - t>thibit D ' q . .i, ,.' - , • ) • ..„...-......... ,. ....i4.:-F..N......r IN • W • � }t Page 2 Please consider my sug g estaons. If you wolul d co-operate, we wo ul d a pprecia4.�. it. I feel that your property will benefit a great deal from this proposed street construction. • One, other small detail needs your immediate attention. The tax 'map shows that you own two parcels (Lot 1900 and Lot 1800) . Before.the Building • Department will issue a Building Permit, you should combine these lots into one lot. 7. is can be done at Vlashington County..ouxxty. Th,is will only be necessary,, if your building and the proposed addition do in fact occupy space on each tax lot,. Your appeal is set for April 15, 1980 before the Planning Commission. If you would respond to what I have suggested prior to this date, I would appreciate it, Yours tr y, die stow r Planning Director AHvtn c • • • • • • I I I I y � _ � • e 2 '.� ] ' b h k11 1' D J • , . e. „ .P., ' w 18 . 59 . 010 _.1 t it ! , Chapter 2 8 59 ____ _- I DESIGN REVIEW ii. Sections :. , F r r • !. 4 18. 59 . 010 Purpose of provisions. :`�_ 18 .59 , 020 Administration . 1: 1;5. 18 . 59 .030 Applicability .. r 18 . 59'. 0 0 Conditional onal applicability.ty. 18 . 59 . 050 Matters exempt. , , .18 . 59 . 060 Design review procedure. r 18. 59 . 0 7O Minor deviations. ' 'v g 18 . 59. 0'80 tonding and assuranct?.s. 18 . 59 . 090 Validity period. 'r . 18 . 59 . 100 ° Offsite improvement and right-of-way. i 1 18 . 59 . 0 .0 Purpose of provisions The intent and ter 1• purpose s . ; of des. n review is to prcamote r the general welfare by encoutag-- ' Ing� attention to site planning and giving regard to the natural ; environment, creative project design and the character of the w neighborhood or area. • ' (a) It is in the public interest and necessary or the y e promotion of the safety, convenience, comfort and prosperity of the citizens of the city of Tigard ' (1) To preserve and enhance the natural 'beauties of f f' the lax-td and of the man-made environment, and enjoyment thereof • p I (2) To maintain and .improve the qualtities of and rela- ' `' ' tionships between individual buildings , structures , and the j physical developments which best co intrbute to the amenities , , r and attractiveness of an area or neighborhood; . t (3) To protect and insure the adequacy and Usefulness 1. I of public and private developments as they relate to each other i f and to the neighborhood or area; .,'' . • (4) To insure that each individual development provides v' ,' for a quality environment for the. citizens utilizing that develop- o 1 ment as well as the community as a whole. ilr e 6 (b) In order to prevent the erosion of natural beauty, the • 4 .h decay of environmental amenities and the dissipation of both usefulness' acid function; it is declared necessary: ;; ;t To stimulate creative(� )�groups structures, n��vic��ia��. � � r�, � r design for �i buildings, groups of buildings and s-� , and other physical developments; , 1 . (2) To encourage the innovative use of materials 1 methods and techniques �� q (3) To integrate the function S , appearances and boea- � '1,I; I t ion w of building s a.nd im rovents so as� to bust achievea ,, p �:� i i ate rero atives a fere t -� � nce � � `he I balance between private P�� g , rid �?r� s and t public interest and welfsre, (Ord /7-25 §10 (pE.rt) , 1977) . w r ,[�t= , * Exhibit E ' ' • li .i t 2b3 Tigard r r a .y 'J.. , u m. wn n,r Ii r i 1. r ir ro • . • 0 „ . . ,. . •• • • ..- . • I 1,- • . . . ., - : 1 ' ' ,. ., .i,. ;•.,w, . ... . ILI -1 . 020--18 . 59 . 040 • . Lcit'..*::- : . I . . , 18..1.59 , 020 Administration . (a) AcLion. Within thirty , • -, days of receipE of■a-6-g'ic'YH-Friji- s in conformanc:c.. with all . ,,. . aspects of this code, the planning director or his. agent ,,,, ,, , . shall apprr.we , disapprove or approve wiLh con..IiLions all design review plans requied by this chapt except may , er, excep as . . be otherwise provided under Section 18 . , ' i , (b) Tindings. Action by the planning director or his . agent shall be based upon written findings pursuant to the li . criteria of subsection (d) of Section 18 .58 . 060 . •,. ,,,,,, , . „..: 0 (c) Appeal. Action of the planning director or his • , 1..e.,, agent may be appealed to the design review board by the ., 05. , , , applicant or adjacent property owner provided: - . . (1) The appellant delivers to the planning director , 1,.- a written notice of appeal, stating his reasons for appeal . a based upon the criteria of this chapter. (2) Said written notice of appeal is received by the planning director within twenty days of the applicant' s receipt of notice of action by the planning director or his L. . agent. , : , hl, (d) Decision . The decision of the design review board 0, shall be final order subject to the provisions of Chapter . ■ , • 18 . 92 of this code . . *1 . , (e) Fee Required. ° At, the time of the filing of the . . 0 application for approval of a design review plan, the appli- .. , ii II ' ' cant shall pay fee to be determined by resolution of the city council. . , . . . .. .,,,, A request for Modification of an approved design plan, r ., , pursuant to subsection (a) (3)- of Section 18 . 59 . 0(0 shall b I '1 !•° 1 ,', . 1 . accompanied by a fee as prescribed by resolution of the city Council . (Ord. 77-50 §3 ( 3) , 1977 ; Ord. 77-25 510 (part) , '1 ..., . K. . t . • ' ! 'ay. . 1977) . . j4;!' .. , ,• . . ' • ' 18 . 59 . 030 Applicability, Except for single-family 1 f . dwellings, no building permit or certificate of occupancy . , -1_ ,,v..- • . shall he issued except in conformance with this chapter. . - , , ,," r / . ' *i I 1 I 0.■ . All hew buildings , structures and physical improvements 1 : ??,,°1 5 - . . and relocation, addition, extension and exterior changes of ' ;*fCii1J4 or to existing buildings., structures and physical improvements . ; 11.,....,.., shall be stibject to design review including preparation of a design plant except as otherwise provided, by Section 18 . 59, 040 . -,.. °"Physical improvement, " as used in this chapter inclUdes0 but is not liMited to, patking lot areas in eXce ,ss of three spaces and loading area s,. retaining walls , signs , and cut and fill or grading actions . (Ord, 77-25 §10 (part) , 1977) . . , . •• _- 18 . 59 .040 Conditional 'aeplicability , The planning coth- i '',„.:-Tv., 1 . missian-6rcity Eouii.6ti , as a condition of approval for a .„ . . . , . • , 14 . , j'ttir • - Exhibit V 1 . , liw6tri , 1, . i . , • , 1,01,,,,,, • 295-1 (TigatO 11/15/78). - •- , ' : , i,;,,,,,, ' _ . 0... • • ________ , ( . • . . • • • / •, • • CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 80- 21. • 0 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING PORTIONS OF CHAPTER 18.59.020 DESIGN REVIEW ADMINISTRATION, OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. • • WHEREAS, it has come to the attention of the City Council that certain inconsistencies have developed with reference specifically to the powers of the Site Design Review Board and, • WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council to change the existing system, NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: • • , Section 1: Section 18.59.020 Administration be amended to read as follows: 18.59.020 Administration, (a) Fee Required. At the time of the filing of the application for review of a design plan, the applicant shall pay a fee as de' rmined by resolution of the City Council. (b) Acition. Within thirty (30) days of receipt of design plans in conformance with all aspects of this code, the Planning Director, • or his agent, shall approve, disapprove, or approve with conditions, I • design plans submitted in conformance with requirements of, this chapter, except as may be otherwise provided under Section 18.59.040. (c) Appeal. Action of the Planning Director or his agent may ' be appealed to the Planning Commission, provided: (1) A written notice of appeal be delivered to the City I Recorder stating the reasons for the appeal based upon the criteria of this chapter. (2) Said Written notice of appeal must be received within • twenty (20) days following receipt of notice of action by the Planning • • Director or his agent. (d) Decision. The decision of the Planning CommisSion shall be appealable to the City Council, provided: (1) A written notice of appeal be made to the City Recorder • 1. within twenty (20) days following receipt of notice of action by the • , Planning Commission. (2) The appeal shall be accompanied by a fee as prescribed , by resolution of the City Council. . • The decislon of the City Council shall be final. , Section 2: tnasmudh as it is nedessary to the peace, health, and safety of the ' ' " • public that the foregOing. change in the Cityls records become effective, ^, 1 an emergency is hereby declared to eist, and thi5 ordinance shall. be effective upon its passage by the Council and approval of the Mayors •I, • • Page 1 - ixhibit G ° , • e • , • o• ...,.. ....-,.. ` .:..•,.,,1. ... ...,.. ..-.,a._ •J.,.. ............ ...d ...lw ..•...,,+ r._...,.«..M�.w.,......,. .«. .A:.,...14 ,-..., w.a}v..n.,«�.«,.,H.�.w4.,-,.............. ,�.H-,.. i..�.w .�..1 „......,...:.t _.I,:....i:.«I-..L.....•;_1...._,:..n.�- +n..1.. • '� ■ *i it il It to APPROVED: By unanimous vote of all Council members present, after being read If ', by number and title only two times on this day oE' ii p I, / 19 8 0 1 Recorder City of Tigard ,!� 1 APPROVED: By the Mayor this day o f Y 1980. ' Y Y r. • Mayor - City of Tigard ),\ • f , • • i • • I M r r ,r. i i i i I , ORobI NAwiw8 No. 80-'. � .. , T ''r6_ C • . . .r . . • . . ' . . • �, Cts k w u�d r r :, . x / . 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON I FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHINGTON 3JOHN D. ALEXANDER, and JOHN D. ) • A AI;' XANDER dba BURGER BOY DRIVE- ) ICY RESTAURANT, ) 5 Plainhiffs , ) CASE NO: yU-a l ) • 6 vs. ) AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT 'OF ) ISSUANCE OF RESTRAINING 7CITY OF TIGARD, a municipal ) ORDER , corporation, ALDIE HOWARD, Planning ) . 8 Director,,, MAYOR ALAN MICHELSON, ) „`• Councilman NANCIE STUMLER, Councilman) 9 KENNETH SCHECKLA, Councilman JOHN E. ) COOK, Councilman 'TOM BRYIAN, k 10 ) • 1 1 ..r_._..... Defendants. ) ' STATE OF OREGON ) 12 ss. County of WASHINGTON ) i. 13 i I, JOHN D. ALEXANDER, being first duly sworn on oath depose } 14 � and say: 1 15 • i 16 That I am the plaintiff in the above cause of action, and I � .lam the owner of the property and sole proprietor of the BURGER BOY I W c RESTAURANT. ' 18 a rj 119 That on December 3, 1979 ,1 applied for a zoning adjustment so ' • 6 p,0s20that I could build an addition to the above described restaurant. f JwS a Tigard, b 21 That on December 2l, 1979 , the staff of the City of Tiga 'i 4 41., c)Y W , 1 a, 22 its report to the Site Design Committee , recommended approval of my�,W � p 9' f Pp � ,� � o4 ■ awe' r di N 23project with sixteen specified conditions to be met before a building 1. . ' P 24permit would. be issued: 1. 25 That on January 24 , 1980, I filed a notice of appe.- 1 with the ' 26City Recorder and on February 7, 1980 , I filed an addendum to , rd Pagel-AFFIDAVIT I I, .iii .n ww.yr.nu nr•a m.4....n..+•wrr anon..yxu.w..x n.xa.J..u..•nu r...rv.t•.nuu.u.. i ..v .. r. r n... err, ��r .�. .. ..r. ., .... s -• ti r 4K OW ; • lthe appeal, requesting a hearing concerning the sixteen specified , 2 conditions in particular the request that I dedicate a certain amount 3of my property for a roadway project before a building permit would 4be issued. 5 That on a date uncertain, a staff report from the Tigard 6 Planning Department, signed 'by ALDIE HOWARD, Planning Director, 7recommended denial of my appeal. 8 Thereafter, at the recommendation of same city staff, and while gmy variance request was before the Site Design Review Board 10the city staff presented to the city council a proposal to terminate 11 the existence of the Site Design Review Board, notwithstanding my • the city council terminated 12 va�,riance appeal being before that body, y ii • • 13its existence, thereby affecting my procedural due process rights. I" 14 , That now on April 15, 1980 , my appeal is scheduled to be heard 15befor_e the planning commission, and I desire the Site Design Review 16Board to review the matter, or for the to approve my variance I �+ 17 request. !' ' op 0 V 18, Any appeal from the Planning Commission would be a useless act a 1r9 as the defendants have no legal basis r to condition the issuance of a w� W permit rmit u. P on the dedication of certain real property, to' wit: Y °; j ^. 2 i a. On March 13 , 1978, the City of Tigard, Oregon gon ;i. r ;1 N Wa �2 ac i g by and through the defendants , named herein, a pp ro ved and � A 7 , W ; 9 ; WPC 44 Plan, thereby incorporating proposed N � 2��pssed city ordinance 78- oz rang ro; . § 24 street plans realigning Dartmouth from I-5 West through NPO f t 4 then 2 Torth to Pfaffle across 99W into the City of Tigard, Oregon 26Comprehensive Plan. 4 Vz Pa�� 2 pi�'�'IDA �r i( P R r • • A 1 b. NPO #4 Plan has a drawing on page 15, figure 3, • 2step 2 , which designates the .Dartmouth connection as being WEST of 3 tax lots 1800 an 1. 1900 . 4 c. •NPO #4 Plan has not been changed by resolution, 5ordinance, or other legislative means as of the date of this 6 affidavit. ' 7 d. The decication being required by the defendants 8for the granting of the requested building permit is on the EAST • gside of my property. 10 e. If the Dartmouth connection to 99W is constructed 1lto current NPO 04 Plan specification, dedication of my property 12ar a portion of my property would not be necessary. • 13 f There is no rational relation between NPO 04 • 14Plan, figure 3 , step 2 , page 15 and the required dedication. The l5Plan designates the Dartmouth, connection on the WEST side of tax lot 161900 while the defendants are requiring dedication Can the EAST side ' 17of tax lot 1800. te4 18, ror the above reasons, I believe there is no legal basis for -A �i i • 9 the defendants to have the granting of my building per mit on the d eca �a t ion ,� a Vg; 20 of certain real property owned by n1e: eery day of delay is costly '. building costs , and labor 21in that �.ni'latio�. is pushing 'interest. rates, bui � flh 2cots, to such a level that it will be diffclt to finance construction 23i ' I am delayed much further. Every moment the defendants delay ranting me the requested building permit am, in danger of losing a 24granting g �. �' p g 2 opportunity p�us�.ness ' o or�tunit. to expand and. better serve the 26 The Cit y of Ti gard should be temporarily ' restrained, until • ; • t (v 1 M (tA ' this matter is adjudicated: 2 1. From processing the appeal of plaintiff' s variance 3 • throu h the Planning Commission;sion g 4 2. From processing any matter through the Planning Commission 5or the City Council which was required to have been processed through tithe Site Design Review Board until this a. fiant' s appeal before it is 7considered 8 3. From seeking the denial of this affiant's ariance request 9based upon any matter pertaining to the dedication of of fiant' s; land 10for a road; • 11 4. From taking any action which would modify the roadway 12allignments of Dartmouth and Pfaffle streets, as set forth in City°„ 13'Ordinance 78-9 , NPO 44 Plan, until plaintiff' s variance request has 14been passed upon by the Site Design Review Board and such other appeal 15 bodies provided in City of Tigard ordinances; 16 5. From modifying any existing Tigard and street et mewsure, or 17 ordinance which would cause the reallignment of Pfaffle or Dartmouth ISstreets until this mater is adjudicated. � 1 19 ,DATED this �� .ay of April, 1980 . , 4 PA - JOIN D. AlitXANDERi Plai tiff 7:::1 a 21 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before; me this /J `day of April , 1980. 0 N 4 E4 22 Win' k1'],iiii'i N 23 No . i Public for Oregon My Commission I E Xp i r e s c 1-30-81 24 25 26 Page 4 AFI'Sn.Ia.VIT 1 , . r M b ri , tc ` i 1' IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON 2 FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHINGTON ;, 3 JOITN D. ALEXANDER, and JOHN D. ALEXANDER dba BURGER BOY ) t 4DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT, ) 5 Plaintiffs, ), CASE NO: 90- Y37 4 6 vs• ) MOTION 7CITY OF TIGARD, a municipal ) corporation, AL DIE HOWARD, Planning ) 8Director, MAYOR ALAN MICHELSON, ) Councilman NANCIE STUMLER, Councilman) 9KENNETH SCHECKLA, Councilman JOHN E. ) COOK, Councilman TOM BRYIAN, ) 10 ) Defendants. ) 11 I 12 COMES NOW the plaintiffs,JOHN. D. ALEXANDER and BURGER BOY 13DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT by and through their attorney, John S. Marandas, 14and moves the court to restrain and preliminarily enjoin the defendants 15as follows, to wit: . 16 1. From taking any action, further proceedings, or modify'•Ig • k 17the roadway allignments of Dartmouth and, Pfaff le streets as set firth in 0 «r a 18 Cit y Ordinance 78-9 , NPO 04 Plan, until pliantiff' s variande request i has been passed. upon by the S .te Design Review Board and SL.,::h other 20apPeal bodies provided in City of Tigard ordinances; W w `� 2. From processing any matter through th e Planning Commission l* a�x 21 .• i °'g .,or the City Council which was to have been processed through the Site :a°'H r Design Review Board until plaintiff' s appeal before it is Considered;` of 24 3. From conditioning plaintiff' s variance request`upon the dedication of certain real property owned by plaintiff 26 4. From processing laintiff ! s appeal of ,'the variatee request Page 1 OTIOT � � � � • ■ 1 • i I T } 4 th�•rough the Planning Commission; 5 e From creating,r altering, or modifying an y existing g City t Y• • 3of Tigard ordinance which would cause the reallignment of Dartmouth or 4p f of f s reets le' t until this matte r is a7udicated. .„� .ted this /pfd --day of April, 1980. A ?J-,{{��•��r� 4 it 0..r u JOHN �e NS AN A S BAR R 6082 Attorney for Plaintiffs 9 !, 10 1 • 14 • 16 1 18 5' i 19 ,�' N , 2Qw t 3 z N C � X 21. r r a w .. Na 22 Ir w T 28 �' 24 I • ! 25 I k 26 I I t fi r • 1 page 2—MOT1O .. I � I „G1 w t 14� ��.t T H” , �\ ��• I a ., , I, v ai,,, a , 0 • • • f RECEIVED APR 151980 In the cIRculT Court of the State of Care , i Q T�GA�a b d s- Pk for the County of..GJASHING 'CST r, � JOBN D. ALEXANDER, and JOHN D. .ALEXANDER dba 4.BURGER BOA,b ........, .. . R`LVE--m Rr,SZAURANr, CITY OF TIGARD vs, Plaintiff TIGARD, a municipal corporation, ALDIE HOWARD i S UMAI NS •Flair i birec tor, MAYOR ALAN MI NELSON Councilman NANCIE STUMLER;, `Councaaman KENNETH ,SCHF Councilman ;: JOHL\I E COOK `Council z ,CK[�A, COOK; TOM BRYIAN Defendant '-' T o •ALDIE H-ZOWARD, PLANNING DIR''CrOR City of Tigard ._ '.». .,.........,,....... 12420 S Pia in r Tigard,. Oregon' Defendant IN THE liVAllitE OF THE STATE OF OREGON: You are hereby required to appear ,end answer the corn ' plaint filed against ,•r a in the above entitled cause within ten days from the date of service of this esurnrnons upon , you, if served within this county; or if served within any other county of this state, then within t4�arrty days from the date of the service of this summons upon you; or if served outside the state of Oregon but within the United + States) then within four weeks frorit the date of the serv:;co of this summons upon you;or if served outside the United , States, then within six weeks from the date of service of this summons upon you;and if you Pail so'to answer,for want , thereof, the plaintiff. .. will apply to the court for the relief demanded therein, NOTICE 'TO DEPENDANT:nEAD THESE PAPERS CAFtivlF1'1>YY,`a'1 You must "appear"in this case or the other side will win auto ■ matica.ily, To "appear" you mist file with the court a legal paper called a `:motion," 1td.emurrer'' or "answer." This paper must be given days to the court within *.t.,-,-!...`,1,.,...,..w tits along with the required filing fee, It must be in proper foray and have proof of service on the plaintiff or plaintiff's attorney to show that the other side has been given a ' copy of it If you have questions, you should see an attorney immediately. r +'If summons is served within the above named county, insert"10" days; if served r.. • Within 3ny�,other county in the 'state, insert "'l0" days; it served outside tiro State �.. .. .i! ,»� ..,,� G�. �fit,Vl..(�. of Oregon 'but within tot United States, insert "tour." rwccics; it served outside the ' United States,insert"six" weeks, Attorney._,„ for Plaintiff_.... . STATE OF OREGON, County of Muli:»narn h )8s. I, .,.....,.., ,.5, ..,Ma:?r'anda.s f , John , . y ne,of plaititi f rte s do hereby certify that I prepared the foregoing copy of suminons/a cr lava-er rentli ihMantlr't�i Gin ihe�' i$' , ' original thereof; and that it is a true and correct copy of said original, _-Per land,....,.. ......, Oregon, dated the,..,,.... ...../.4./.t,1-,..,.,,day of .......Apr. , ..... ,,,,.....,.... .., 19„$0. ..,.,..-... ,,..... ..Q..., L..-.x...4“soc....,—,1,0,,,.....,,f/...,___ '1 of Atr?orne s lot ox I'lairitrff.: .,. TO THE SHERIFF, OFFICER OR OTHER PERSON SERV THIS MMONS: , I 'f34""�-rdf1; t.u-,1� You are hereby directed to serve a copy of the within summons, together with a copy of rile complaint, upon ft the defendant.,,.,. ...........................,. 4 ..............i 4 o, ............,,. and a copy of the Within summons only upon the other defendant... . ........ ... „........ p , /5/.„...:579:,. „... ,.. ...,..14/k.m..14.a...k.„04:616..,..,..J,..., BLOOM, AtVt.T , RUBEN, MAR ANDAS & D , of Attorneys lot Plaintiff.,.,,. AtTOi2NF'Vs'FOk PLAINTIFF 1 SUlle,6 7 Boise Cascade Sulidint� ' 1600 S.W,Fourth Avehue ? Penland,Oregon"97201 ' Teitphono(5d31 224.044 l'AGE i -sU�Mo WS, FORM Ada,2i 9,0--.SUMMbW—.For SOMrtr !Midi or Oulslzlo Skis, e . sYkVtNs,Nt:Ss LAW F+lf[ii tn.,wdn`i'LdNtly,cln�,, ...,. ...a ,.. . ....,.r ,.. ....... ... .. _.. .Mme. .ter. <. • it , a U ., 'I - - a .. ...........�,_ r_ .. .n•... ..r.. _..-.,.,«..,,,., .wu.�....,. t fad_,...... ,PROOF.OF SERVICE WITHIN STATE ' (A) STATE OF OREGON,County of . ass. ON INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANT(S) I (2V'arne and Title) �t County, Oregon hereby certify that the foregoing summons was delivered to me for,'service on the ' day of , 19 ; that 1 served said summons within said county and state one the ' ...............••._,•.,day of • , 19 ,,,_., on the within named defendant ., by delivering a copy thereof to the said defendant, and if more than one then to each of then, personally and in person; that I served the complaint hi said cause, to which reference is made in said sum- m,ons,on the following defendant ,.,.•.,.., •„•...•,,...,.,.,w..:..,,»..,,..x.„_,,..,,..•r,•.. ` ering��to and leaving with the defendants'last named and each of them time personally acand i said son a copy en and �'' day, by then . there personally delivering , , d in person, of the complaint; that each,copy of said surnrnons and of said i on7plaint so served was prepared and certified to be a true copy of the original " ;. thereof by one of the above twined attorneys for the plaintiff in the said cause. original That the defendant ...... named in said,summons cannot be found in the county last above mentioned. Title. By Deputy. , g PROOF OF SERVICE E lITH IN STATE T, ATS 1 I�) ON CORPORATE DEFENDAT tilATF OF OREGON, County o f ...„,...J._....,.,.x.,., ss: I, ,....._.•,..r.,,•,•...:..r,._.......- ..,,.,,.....r.,..,..•,..1......................-. •,,,.. .(Name and Title) of ,... ,.»._....... .........,..,.,County, Oregon hereby certify that the foregoing summons was delivered to me for service on the ' ' _,day of ......♦•,J ,.,.,••..w,J,,,•.,..,., 19.....,..; that on •.,,,...,.,•,..,..r•,,,,,•.,•••_J,,».:♦..♦__.,,..., , 19.........., in.r.J... ••,•••.... ...._,.„...,_, With) Gregor!, I served p .•,.,.., ,•,.,.,.,,r ., , , ...•w„ ..,,•...,...g....,•..,copy...,•...,..,.r.,:. ...........C bs cl the corporate defendant , „ t�ith said summons and with the cons faint to which referenfe is made in said summons by delivering a co of said summons and a copyof said complaint, to ._.•...................•..,r__.•.,.:.,•.w•....,,.,..,J. .,,•,...,.., . : .... , ,. who .s the „ of said corporate tiefe.rxdartt; each said copy so served was prepared and certified to be a true copy of the original thereof by one of the above named at- torneys In said cause. M t n Y ,,...-...... ,.•r,.,,.,,,,..••.,..,.. ,. ,,., _...,, • .. •. r teamed in 'That the defendant .. �, ., � said summons � � cannot be found i the count. Last above mentioned. . Title, I� Deputy. I PROOF OF SERVICE OUTSlbE STATE (C) STATE OF .,......•..», ,, County of ................. ..,• ..•ass. ON INblVibliAL DEFt:NDANT(S) 1'; ......... . ............................., ,..........,.,J..... .,......,.,.r•,,.... •,, being first duly sworn)depose and say: That I am and at all times 1. 1 hereinafter n entroned was a competent e.rson over the age of $ � ' party .......:.......... .t I . that •' ' received e f f p p 6 Yep rs and not a art to or an attorney in the a/ cause; I 1 .tti '' � � g suninions for service on the.-- of lyo�e tynfrt erg cause th tore going + ........,,. .. .„......,,_. g..,., ..,�., that I srt�i�ed'sand Summons oti the said defendant...) „ .. ..,....._.•.w,.x....,.. .., ........... on the ...•............♦day of....•.,.,. ........ .................. 19.,._,._..., within the County 0#-........•..,,., ....,...... , . ..,. �. ,.,., •.. ,;—..—, State of , ..w„_. ..............................•, by dhoti and thore personally delivering to and leaving with the said deleridant,and, it more than one with each of thorn, personalty and Iii person,,.0 Coby of said suriitrions together with a copy of the'ooritplaint;therein referred to; each such f • copy so served i'as prepared and ceri;ffied`to be a true copy of the original thereof by one of the attorneys for the plaintiff in said coatt and causes and itxat each person so served is the identical one named as defendant in said Cause, . SAubscel ed and Worn to before me this .. , . .......r.. day df . (OCF`ICiAL S Ai. Na Notary F tided tor ., .... .. M r y.cotttrni ssioii etpirest ..:.,...,„r........ .......:. ............_.......,........,...,.u,.,. aAd --.sU>Vilno Js .... .... ....:.�, . . .......:,..a ......... a...4 1, ::.,...:......:....... • w, ,, .,u.....*... w .owl+..,fir,. ,w "Jf,a•,.,,.» �, AFIDAVII JF .PUBLICATION � iy � `© ; 11 l L ' i'prill,5`x'fl£l.0, 7, O p.mti STATE OF OREGON,, ss, ti','.' Fowler',Brit ail Latbra` 6.0ii l + 1:08.6s t W V Allit",,tr$tre�tiF�'igard1 COUNTY OF WA HINC�TQN, ,, „ iibi b' 6iiii .;,;k,.it:� n a, �`X� iJ7 Tyr �1V I1 ..r. I .......-. Joseph—Schg.:get.,.—• .............................:.......... re'que t UyMltit>a'D,i t xap<9arwtb Y • ' first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the publisher ..................•-.•...,...•, '',s;ppeul(tai 1plihiu tptreClo j '� anef4."9 , being Pions;pii, upon d06.0dinen t'o(i 1 of The Tigard Times, a,newspaper,of general circulation, as defined �d II�B88W Fluty Co, p *td'i4 ,dt 3. 00 . ttti:0 14Q0) by ORS 193,U1.U� and 1.03.020, ,pufalished at Tigard, in the aforesaid county and' _ � �a,�,�>,�t�� , , 1, '� I state; that the legal notice, a printed copy of which is hereto' annexed, was 4 ,;QUA ti 80(G,ity o�`igard)i.)• A request by tlio Ct aP 7'�gard.f, the entire issue of said newspaper for successive and ',a r'o e. .st bnceTreit Ai lendfilent 4i�, published in o:'Gh.ttpter 18 2O,'Of t,h,0:I and>1�ltttii0 s Cede tl�� f ngl� nikialy fit „ consecutive weeks in the following issues '' ' al tsKS'�R�1 Identtal' �anus, \ �� ; ! ',�,: . ....2.-8r...4 1.98C1.....w..............�..,. „. , •4,4'1',i;' A'4&0 Cit e`f Cigatd) '''� ` . _.......,,.... gip . `• `._ ' ..:'� .... A r, iiiibgbkrb .he,'Ctt of`igao �� ' . t" �� ct giit.i �t�diz►dtipo T01 .6t'.neh,t etitti a ,xtgn 1 dhaOtOr,18Ad ofiiie Tigard!. {i ,iiTi,�• .• ; ,, , Chi$B��ZpNE1 C)It ANACF'1+,1E1'J x day of ,`,.'at ( r) Subscribed and sworn to before me this J. h_...... ......... �' lv1ENT�;0.6',!5$0(City of�rigard) i, c txe5t b tt" t d y�ipril ,...1s..,..s� o It fiaar or a te�r8d toe`fl hrdhdent ;ory n � ,��r� 8 lvludiaipl ��A a , �I nary tibhc of 0 ... dodxeat�n an additionoi Ctndiflo'i��> tse`i�h the Pesidelitlat a'minaroiti'�'• 1. H.+C7MMIS51(7�r 1 (C+.4)',tape. ;, i• 15.,E ,V ' It commission n exp „8p. ' ., 2f1N'l:, 5;�1 CtAN 2ta 7ia ices � t,.j�,o.. � } ( �i�Way'4�'d�n•�antar� PC 7 My � .��$ `1'�8� Gre :," A e�u es.t'by l7t Johns.Fbstf.dr :, a is br obail e In rho aooupaihcfiii;t1K, '_, lQWec lh•t,lr'0,0i y'°}I`oWhr•E�ehte , t lti e;3Paofio ily tha;al Wande o`a ', °1 Motor#nary•er1,a o0aed at',',sW'list ,. 444 so 8rihbils 1erty itoi d.c ,ttsfi Co' '• Ts tolv0p151• ,t•X0 S0 2;,404 ,' 5x ` VA .1A.Nct•i V't00 j(M'o µ" hofnglAecot,Cen tell,N 6',N �t .., " : x .,A reAtiest"b flaiie 146;',4 1OW„0 1; a Vorlaxivator'tWcsCgtts bi ,;'' rnht L i ' C1o, rbtssbua :(C4drc fdk�,tTd , arrO Asct Cehtdr`'tccadrat 7155 *V,Vatit 5tfeet(y ati. o,`i`ttx;,MO S1 1bI f t f Thxytut lop) ' ' o6 'A tAiv; a( ass ti A retluost,• y 01 gti1i Arad,"Aretiiteets •k E for a.'V0rtuti tr frttn\;,the side artt'set< beck raquirotrteht if�twennty(203)'fdet ,I in. �<tf,ight trtdustrial't(M 3)2,cac�tti :; i ten CIO'?fdot:c;iilk a L'1O a rn.site ibr iu.,0 rt°1 i V,fit >r47$ "8W,', 414.A ante k(Wosi1, C5,,,:�� • s 70.:Me 21 12A i�riit' t,;1001) sP'�'I i 5r ,ZA tO C,C A; C=E,2C$.:80,1)e nl ,; t 'Neet) 1Pp No,1. A;i`bquest,,by,[ibo.ols ,',O'Neal,to a `zi1?t1 "htl!('•gG''ttt h 5 oinkil'I1�;.gtt . o Ciiurity, '>(t= to City o Tfbard::R 7 ,;� 1$in• its 1:tsliiily 17osidentiiii",Zoho,lo,ri ' et}j d,atijaaet t't0H,tho north,sid0 ô i`,�1' ;; eeefaid' ''&' et' 4'1 /ofixso ete cirar *F T1TAt'!' WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON r, March 4, 1980 F • Mr. John, D. Alexander , _ C 11688 SW Pacific Highway • Tigard, Oregon. 97223 Reference: SITE DESIGN REVIEW, SDR 61-79, Burger Boy Restaurant Dear Mr. Alexander: In your letter dated. February 7, 1980 -• appeal of conditions outlined in ' Site Design Review, SLAB. 61-'79, Staff Report - you mention Condition #8. Note that this condition is very 1Pgeneral" in relation to necessary dedications along your eastern boundary. We would like to obtain seventyfive (75') ) feet total right-of-way for the construction of the Dartmouth extension. At this time, it appears that Mr. Finke end Mr. Hale have provided sixty (6Q") feet. Therefore, we would like to acquire the additional fifteen (15') feet from you or approximately three thousand (3`,000) square feet of your total 23,086 square feet. It is my feeling that the construction of the Dartmouth extension and the installation of traffic signals will enhance your property significantly. I suggest that we are not being confiscatory. All new construction in this City is required to dedicate ,necessary right-of-way for streets, if that right-or-way does not exist now. In your particular case, you will be asked to join in a Local, Improvement District (L.I.D.) and pay your fair share of the costs to construct the Dartmouth. extension. Condition #2 is a condition the City applied to y has lied PP other similar situations to improve the safety on 99W. In this particular instance, you will benefit again from the exposure to Dartmouth and a signalized intersection on 99W, Obviously, you may want to change your entire traffic pattern if and when Dartmouth is constructed. Condition #4 can be eliminated. My atte mp t was to break-u p the larger asphalt area and enhance the aesthetic appeal of your property;, I would not insist on this condition, tree have been contacted d by the developer of the Marine Lumber property to yoii.r north x They are seriously considering tie dedication of the necessary rig ht�of�-way to ccrinect Dartmouth to Pf of fe1. This will allow a 4-Way ay intersection at 95W, The Randall Company and Mr Finke have tentatively agreed to the , pp the final Dartmouth ala.gn�ient. In short, Mr, A:l;exander, we area approaching , stages of the Dartmouth alignment. 12420 S.W MAIN ',C . BOX 2389 ' TIGAtb OIREGO 97223 PH: 6394 -----w � � �J 972 1 7 1 • Page • • suggestions. If you would co-operate we would appreciate Please consider my su9�� you � it. I feel that your property will benefit a great deal from this proposed street construction. One other small detail ne e d s Y our, zmmedi to attention. The tax map shows that you own two parcels (Lot 1900 and Lot 1800) . Before the Building Department will issue a Building Pelt, you should combine, these lots into one lot.. This can be done at Wash.i ngtan dcunty. This will only be necessary if your building and the proposed addition do in fact occupy space on each tax lot • Your appeal, is set, for April 15, 1980 before the. Planning Commission. If you would'respond to what I have suggested prior to this date, I would appreciate it. Yours tr y, Alcie Bo , ,. Planning Director AHvmc • ( oriolt vidwIrti 4091c r February 7, 1980 Aldie Howard, Planning Director Doris Hartig. City Recorder City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Mr. Howard & Mrs. Hartig: Here is an addendum to my appeal (dated Jan. 24, 1980) of the staff recommendations of Planning Director Aldie Howard with regards to: Site Design Review, SDR 61-79, John Alexander/Burger Boy Restaurant -- Dated December 21 , 1979 and Jan. 7, 1980 This is in response to City Attorney Joe Bailey's letter of • Jan. 30, 1980 requesting that the appeal of this decision "state the reasons for the appeal". These are the reasons: Recommendation #8 is confiscatory in that it takes without compensation nearly i of my usable property and in effect could destroy the full potential of my business. It also leaves me without adequate parking or potential for growth. This condition should be eliminated. Recommendation #2 should also be eliminated until the time that NPO#4's plan for its street connection through Tax Lot • 1801 is made with Pacific Highway along the northeast gide of my property. Recommendation #4, that part of which, vposes two landscaped areas in the middle of the parking lotlf IA of the building. • This parking area would be too crowded and it makes a driving hazard for customers. I would like a date set for this appeal at the earliest possible time. !Very truly yours , John D. Alexander 11688 S.W. Pacific Highway Tigard, Oregon p7223 tnclosure: Copy of original appeal cc: City Attorney Joe Bailey 4 . LANDIS, AEBI & BAILEY LAWYERS • 1518 GEORGIA-PACIFIC BUILDING PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 TELEPHONE(503(224-6532 DAVID C.LANDIS FRED M.AEBI JOE D.DAILEY JOHN c.MERCER January 30, 1980 JAMES M,CALLAHAN • ' I 1 ' Mr. John Alexander 11688 SW Pacific Highway � Ti and OR 97223 Tigard, Dear Mr. Alexander: The City has received your notice of appeal regarding Site Design Review 61-79. Your notice, however, / does not yet comply with the provisions of the relevant ordinance. I enclose a copy of Section 18. 59.020 of the Tigard Municipal Code. You will note that Section (c) (1) requires that the notice of appeal state the reasons for the appeal. The reason that is important in this instance is that the Planning Director's ruling contained a long list of conditions , and the City needs to know which o,E them you object to before the appeal can be arranged. Would you please send the Planning Department and the City Recorder a letter bringing your notice of appeal into compliance with 18 .59 .020 (c) (1) ? Thank you for your help. Very truly ours, - ' oe D. Baile' JDB/Inr Enclosure cc Mr. Wilbur Bishop 12290 SW Main Tigard, OR 97223 cot Mr. Aldie Howard ,' Planning Director P. O Box 23397 t: Tigard, OR 97223 g r ,..,-'.,.,.•,w.uw.a.w- • .•• ._.,....- w.,.,.._ .,.a .L. -1 ,...■..,.w..... .,...+..+....,..1t:.. 1...,,....,......«,...,., _.,...,,,,....,.....4—.........,....'...,..—..„..„.i....G .M ... _..,;c+..r.-.:."M,.,....t,nJ.....,.... :1.,.:.M., t=.., ...,..—«..u4:....................w.:.V.,L14..:a.a]..,..L.:...+3,..— A'.,1�:, • • • • • • 1-,A N C7 IS, A,E B I & BA I LEY LAWYERS • 1516 GEORGIA-PACIFIC BUILDING I PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 ' TFLEPI40NE(503)224-6532 DAVID C.L ANDIS', FRED M.A 6.B1 JOE D.BAILEY JOHN C.MERCER, • JAMES M.CALLAHAN' January 30, 19 8 0' A. 4 I 1 Mr. Aldie Howard Planning Director City of Tigard P. 0. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Aldie: r I enclose the Burger Boy copy file and a co of . ' the letter 1 have sent to Mr. Alexander and Mr. 1Bishop. II Very truly yo rs, )1/4)II 1 ►T.e D. Bailey 1.o 1 1 JDB/mr , Enclosures il 41 1 1 i 11 • li l ? ° 79 »' .. �................ ... ...Ir_+,...-. �..',...,, ...� x.....�iL.,+.i..Y_...—..,_,•..awil�..u,,....-...,....a....,,n�l,..a.:..;VV...n�i... ..A.F:4.:r.. .-. -+A..,...a..,....� N. ......��r.,.wr..... ...,...r....,x,....ar.......-n.«...,.....�.�..�,...w...w.... .s....x 1:iF nti.�v Yr. � .....r+i..w F_,iwk-ti.+.. r.r-�,>a u -� (1 • � � i yu� 1. ` i � � January 24, 1980 IN/ED OF TIGAfit) Doris Hartig City Recorder order a.t c City of Tigard Tigard, ORegon 97223 Dear 'Mrs. Hartig: You are hereby notified that x wish to appe l the staff recommendations of Planning Director Aldie Howard with regards to: Site Design Review, SDR 61-79, John Alexander/Burger Boy Restaurant --- Dated December 21 , 1979 and Jan, 4, 1980 Tigard city ordinances state that the appeal should be to the Site Design Review Committee rather than the Planning Commission as shown in Mr. Howard's Staff Report 1 Would you please let me know which board will hear` my appeal also wish the appeal date set at the earliest possible time. truly ours i 1 t� „Mr � �r, fi�yr y/' �P 4.�+_wm..-..�-,+•uwA / r ohn D. Alexander 1688 S.W. Pacific Highway Tigard,, OreL.on 97223 • • • • • • • 4" 0.,x) STAFF REPORT/SITE DESIGN REVIEW City of Tigard 12420 SW Main Street December 21, 1979 DOCKET: Site Design Review, SDR 61-79, John Alexander/Burger Boy Restaurant APPLICANT: Mr, John D. Alexander OWNER: Same 11688 SW Pacific Highway Tigard, Oregon 97223 SITE 4r LOCATION: 11688 SW Pacific Highway (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 36CD, Tax Lot 1900) 4 PV SITE DESIGNATION: C-3 "General Commerciaron 99W PARKING REQUIREMENTS: One (1) space per each 100 square feet of gross floor area. In this case, the applicant proposed to add to an existing building (1440 square feet) . The addition will be 960 square feet making a total of 2400 square feet. Parking spaces required equal twenty four (24) . Applicant shows twenty seven (27) on site plan. SITE PLAN/DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS: The most important aspect of this particular site is the fact that there is significant developable land to the south which must be served with transportation facilities in the near future. NPO #4 clearly outlines the need for a connection from the 1-5, Haines Road interchange west on Dartmouth Street across 72nd Avenue, then to the north to intersect with 59W. This property is the "key" to development of this proposed street system. • At this time the property owner directly to the west (Robert Randall Company) , has approached Staff with a development proposal. This applicant clearly understands the need for the NPO #4 street system and reali:8es that he must cooperate with surrounding property owners and ha S agreed verbally to do so. Mr. Alexander, in this case, has agreed verbally to cooperate also. One proposal is to bring the Darmouth extension to 99W through, between the Chalet Pancake House property and the Burger Boy Restaurant for a four way intersection with Pfaffle Street through the Marine Lumber Company property. At a meeting earlier this year with the people in this area there waS a great deal of • discussion concerning this proposal. Since that time mr. Gordon Martin has not advanced his development plans for a large amount of property directly behind Mr. Alexander's property. Staff still has the responsibility to carry through with the NPO #4 plan for streets, Staff's position is that the Oregon Department of Transportation must be satisfied ' , with any plans affecting 99W. Due to the fact that we now have adloining property owners who wish to develop, it seems logical to suggest that the location of the 99W entry for property to the south be through Tax Lots 1800, 1801 and 190C. • \It • • , , , , • STAFF REPORT/SITE DESIGN REVIEW SDR 61-79 • December 21, 1979 • Page 2 Staff is attempting here to formally notify this applicant that significant events in the future require that he dedicate a portion of his property for street improvements and share in the cost of these improvements. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this project with the following conditions: , 4e. 1. Property frontage along 99W be improved by adding sidewalks, curbs, gutters 4nd storm drainage. Plans for all work in the public right-of-way shall be approved by the Public Works Director of Tigard. Al]. work in the public right-of-way on 99W shall also be approved, by Mr. Ron Kleinschmidt of the Oregon Department of Transportation, 238-7437, prior to issuance of Building permits. 2. One curb cut on 99W shall be eliminated. One ingress/egress point shall remain and shall be thirty (30') feet wide with appropriate concrete aprons. 3. The front landscapilig area shall be ten (10') feet wide behind the sidewalk installation. Significant vegetation shall be installed to screen the parking lot from the Highway. Site plan to be revised to show screening. 4 4 4. Parking sp cis along the boundaries of the entire parking lot shall be curbed with cemen.■,. Site plan shall be revised to show two landscaped areas in the parking lot. This will provide a break in the large, asphalt visual areas. •, 5. The existing site sign is to be moved to the landscaped area in front of 0 the building. No changes in the dimension of the sign will be allowed. Wien relocated, the existing sign shall not exceed fourteen (14') feet in height from the ground level. 6. Vire hydrant to be located not more than 250 feet from buildings. • , 7. All "Native vegetation along southe--s, property line is to be trimmed, thinned, and area is to be improved with ground cover. Landscaping area to be added along northeast boundary. ChangeS. to be shown on revised site plan. 8. Applieant to make required dedications, (see rough description attadhed) and * to sicp a non-remonstrande agreement for futti.re street improvetants for the I-5, t:.artmouth to 99W Street System as oUtaned in the NPO 04 Plan prior to issuance of Building Permits. 9. Parking stalls on the revised site plan shall be visable. Traffic circulation arrows on asphalt shall be clearly shown on revised site plan. 10. No Occdpancy Permits Shall be issued until all Conditions pladed upon is development by the City of Tigard have been satisfied and inspections verifying this have been carried out by the appropriate department. , 11. No minor land partitions shall be made in reference to this projedt unless formal application iS made to the City of Tigard Planning Department and the minor land partition is approved and recorded. 1 • � .. ..__,., a ... .m....., ,.... _........ ,,....,. _.w..,..,. ,...,..„.nw. ....„,.... .,,,F+.«.✓,lL., n_....,�..:.1/.+.....i..:E.:...I.....-J,.n.J.,.,.-... , ,..+...-.1Mwtr,:",�..._...,.,r:A'., L., ,y+u.,....Ja4,.w1.t.At.h.$'...: STAFF REPORT/SITE DESIGN REVIEW SDR 61-79 December 21, 1979 Page I I g I I 12. No changes will be made to,approved plans or specifications unless formal application is made to the appropriate City'department and changes are I approved by that department. Application for 'changes) will be made in. ' writing and shall include applicable drawings. 13. Grading plans on all public right-of-ways shall be submitted and approved . by the Public Works Director prior to commencement of work. 14. All existing or proposed utilities shall' be placed underground. Street lighting installations shall be approved by the Public Works Director. • 15. No Permit shall be issued un ti l the expiration of the twenty day ,, appeal period 'rrz)n ;:he date of approval.. 16" Improvements may be bonded prior to issuance of Building Permits. Prepared and approved by .. 1: ..r'/. 1 g .r I I NOTE: This acknowledgement must be signed and returned to the City of i Tigard, Planning Department. Failure to return this acknowledgement will result in no further action on this project with regards to issuance l of B i1,din g • Permits or engineering approval, • a .cnatu -e Date I Special Note: Action of the Planning Diredtor is final unless notification of appeal to the Planning Coniniit ion 18 filed with the City Recorder within twenty 20) days of the planning Director's Action. • • • • • • I I . _ ,,.; ., , - -'. '• -...,r..--w... .a, ,.. ...ri,-.....,.,.,_... .,.,.,...a:a..... ,u_....Y,.r-..........,,...a..:.: ...i,.a..... ,.... -- -,. .,: ... .. - r,..,..,arn!Gr•., k• ROUGH DESCRIPTION OF STREET DEDICATION • i I I , A I .1 I ;,„P That portion of Tax Loa'. 1800 and 1900 1S1 36CD;as follows, a 60 foot right-of-way, the center of which is the northerly extension of the east line of•Palmer Acres a duly recorded subdivision in Washington County Oregon; the east and west line of it said I'60 foot right-of--way to extend northerly to the northeast line of said Tax Lot 1800 CP . I I 1 • 0 N M r- ( , 1 1 i 1 Li `�'•+._.- -/ I I" ,.Q.a.. _-J 1 1 ' „�,)'`r _,-I_ ,•, \\ \ '+ ��r�Y f ,Y �, ,. t,• i �� f • • n", 230.96 v '' �' 223,69 X 1 M H li 1 r d/1 J i T 1 .4-4 I, ,/ 2 ,,,/ X," - '' . • y,„\ C ''''' 0 S.ZZ , } / / . I J`f _ _ • B ,.. r ) . ' / ry I f:° T • , .. iw 7 ( // , ,,,r '' f ' 2 2 0,4 , ;>,,,,. ,,, , :3 / %o.- 1''^' I PAVED , , . ifipn ,. r. 1 A114' ♦ , -/ I �, PAVED u ,- I / __.r-- " /_ '.f. , 1), .-- -" . , #'' ' ,� PAVED / . ■ ./0" '.r' 2 2 3.0 1e/ t r, , ' ' didolik ,,r •. _ m ( �.i'�'"V Ir 1� �, /------". ,...r _•.1� , JM //�1 n,Li�.q�1 .. ,Y '_"_W / , . , r , ^'M'`,,T'I"✓�".I" c 11'1 1(/•'f ,I��f "..... c, ,..7„7,,,z...,,...„ , ,./1 .,, ,„., • . \ . - ,/,- „---/-1 :, ,, ‘,...v ,...... ,,,/ / • 44 ////7 , V .1" . , /./ ,„ • ; 1* . . ,cl/<:''-/"/ . fer'-' • `-c., )/ \,,) Q ...,----...? . • * ..,t7/ El '''' 4 v-:)("C7 . • , • ,,, , 7/ . . ,,'' Zi t , ,,,,.... —v., 1 .,,,t i p . •' - - ' . ' ', W Y�.^," .', �•, ' ' 4p w ,, � ,. L ,!' .' r ,h , s�•,'r•"w�- 1 °- a� } , ..',r''''''. .,,,,.:, .:',,c:,:. . .„.1 ,.........,-,....iX, *I co„td• - „,,,------,------: , . . c . , ,/,- %.,....„_... ...._ ,...,..., • ..,/ , ,tt,i,...... .......„7" , :,„, ,, , , 1. ,...i• -,,,,, ■ , ,' ,.. )''''. 1 ....',"7/' ---' , .....c.,/ M H 7,F; e--‘, itir ."------,,,,,---:,„,,- „„ ; • , . ,,,,,,Tt .:07.7.T.,-,..;,.:,..„.,...,,...„, ,- .---. 1 ,-' — -t..' '•-' r'w•"y Ji', ✓✓ • + t M .,, ~y 11. ..V,,,,,,.." • r `y • / rI .,. 4t*-,:ti. L. ,.pit..,.,.ist+�' J 1 ? fir i+,7 : e, 0 t ' v Y,+ .7 . . ." ' ' '; "" .A a,Vf`*,' "41:.�,-,t Zr ,•;UW,,z y N..ili yi .M2.r,' , 4...4„,,ty qaa„d,r r ' I*,,z.,4-24.:44,:',14'»tb F;"y"�'AZtyLtyh�1t+�41 t r�,t`Yl;ji4;��;1"ti-4 ^*,P • ”t—,,' -.; ';4,7',:'" +±+4 yi yy;•T�'j, !.'`+ •w4L:L;"S 4'Ir1:+M'{"1�� J^- hl«•n 17,�'��' •yId' Wi yB 1>m '�Sw. �;^ t 'r aw � . � � 1; ' �� 1 � . ' "i�n•3lw,°4 «..�p4Il .w�k:wt�y'rtr� ri'�a� „.k w '4�r�7"1�ii.1'•� 1'. x" .a�T4 tYd« 1 e� . -." i , t, T� �1 I J J"'• I kl yf-r w,r 'H",t.wM�v-R ; w ;1 N�9�'�•f wr'4 ,itgii c'1 X42,'� �,C=X"". _��,a ��„1±..�:,,tY" �kwP�'d.w+ ' . f d ' '_ 'y.+P 4"F'�"'.JS'•t M{.a ,"8 C � ;t`, r�r?,•,, d Ja+7prT r..'"S�H r , ':1 •�� w�. L,f'4 4 Xj y a`'W?1 yA y p A-p,x"I• C:r n e 1��'4" � . i ' '°}�„:.w{rA'.d•M...+ ;aid.t r..-`e:+: ,''�1l i•y,, Y",.N:nt t9.ct^siryjyr.,,^,°,:t�,”y•x',t;1'Iu.ey�w''`"4?w,t�J.w S,.s'"�Tr',"'i f,�• 5... :4- r,,*` .'t I y ..+. . .Y,w,/a.n'1. 4 t,,;lLy +^s��,� ;4i�,rFy+P 1 4 . i�f�"r1+! :vi41:1,-,..,4,.A+,.a.K 4-f-P, i r.,'GF 1 4y 'B iper tr=t, .,i,k , i. , ':,p t . 'i.,b Y' �-3 3t..i.:144•° �i/, :.�7 r f11'.acl.Y 7,� :�hI;�r;.-,.:,;fa w. r.rY`��r 7e {. «ghs-'1,�`d' r.f4 '."90'...-. •.'r.., 3,X- ik'.s""*4.1 a •Y w.' • _ .. .•1 Si_ I/el' SW IAA' SECTION 3 6 T I S R I W WM. t l' ' li WASHINGTON COUNTY, REGON S ALE 1°� 1001 Yt S E C'OR fir.wunlx t. SEE MAPI 1 36C4 ."7 �" lye 1 . AF�jE' G.R,I�75 589048.E °�' C� 4 '' NW CO R.pFA FLE STREET G b q HAMMER d+i+ �L'��1, I"1;O I J• 300116.2 15$.16 r �4G, C • �.75 Ac. � ' • .200 „ 100'' � 4rs.1e � � �' � . d t �� I .89 Ac., 1,85 AC. , i - . --1400— :24 I r� „ • +w F Key. ' hv&o AbQ 1500 n �r, fC$.MO,11,5'341 $� �t��0 9,� 1°.� •,y�' 88 Ac, �, n Q v► bti (w 4.•64 • x ,so /,�' $�! icy O. r e 15.00 • 162.IM3 ��,� op 121101! 31,08' 0 ' w' 116,2 . va 45Ac, ,� m 1 1300 �, ' '°' Neso48'W Iv o ✓.�A�a m '.0 p 1200 �.3/A� a a; 4. .4/Ac. N a ~aZ ur d' ':I Q s'S 0 0 i i 85 AC •0 a' 1601 4^ 0 ti 6 7,\ • , ��'�� a `'g \......\* `�� .9/A c. \ 1501 • 1501 " _,m- 15 0 41. 3/47.∎ Its a «+� r M 1,.,1",:// , , i, \0 'a3 �� 1 I °o Qi. i0 6o .. ••g20 S0Apa�• �` AO/ '/ r ,b'1' i fop 0 S8 0' d q� ^+ SE' R I' .:.•Y dj�r''�r1�1.1�aL,.1».ly1,y;..ir,,, i n' l" ,�,M4 ,� =',j obg„ill .,.« ,:.., ..,$,�,O wa\ Y,-. =ifi,, ss7�' zf8/Ihq® `y' " , 'o\ ba,,) 266.42 ,+.....,,,.., j 2 r.l 1?d,66, 78D/33 S.46o54'� e 1 �y N 650 1"J B,! �' 5 11`�I a)�'6^. 2 2 0 0 .1. 2 2'J O W S E S A z 5 (T G.9'--�� g '�i'+III�I y�� 5.944C, N• 2100 ono 2 /1 p O�lf1 i26.OD I'i/I ',.1't.1:' s IOOAC 1 aeglNs til/Il t , r S 86�40,f r` 2001 2002 1,004 ��tj11C�g(� «, a° 7 Ac. ..,.�:'...r'• t:1' !I,a `•t 1 old _ � a• .1'• j 1 7''•X10 `i. j rr d I a/+q41 ii ',,.° P 1 n . • • " ' • • W 1 • r r r r , i I , . . . . , . . ., . . .• . , . ' • ' . . , • ' ..:0'"'• ' OE'31:V..; ',..,..',':.,L IC AA,'X r.:.i t' '. ' ': . .• • • , )10, , • , ',', , , ' Atigite,'•'0' , , . 4,5 ', :,'•1 H..i., , •,•T„g'!•■,;,/ ' -','..t.le 5 SI:AZ, /-79 12420 S.W. :Main Street * ,Fee Rec'd 1.5-0. a '. . Tiga ,rd or.ega r...5 97223 0 ' '-,•' , 639-4171 RecelP ,..,. t fl. ,_ , . . • . ' Date Reed 1 ' .• : ,,,:r•.•:,• By lc-S. : • . — . 4 . . • . —- . ___ ----- — . _______ _ .,.. . _.- 1 - ...... • The "contact person" named in this'application will receive all major Correspondente I, from the Tigard Planning papartment and that p!rson is responsible for providing Same r , to owner, architects, engineers, consultants, etc. . , .,. ... . . , . ,. • in this case the "contact person" '18: I, ' . „ r NAME 7A.::: V) -\ ~.4WcoAl —— ._ . . . . . . . ,,. ..„Ess_ile 1,0 2 ,c ,444.,L.,...yL___- _,4..tif , . 1. • TELPHOE EN All communications from this department shall include the appropriate file number, The file number in this case is . / have read this settion and I agrTeT—aTT. he "contadt person", to provide all infor-' iliation to other persons with an interest ',11 this project. ,•' . . .• . . , .. . , . Signature date . . • , , . '', • , . , • • • PLEA.S8 PRINT OR TYPE IN. INK . -----_---- . . . . . ''. pAOJECT TITLE: . ' . _..... . , 1,st,,,C;JECT. ADDRESS: Lg2/4 oq.......V,. / .e..-1 .72 ' TA.X* &AR : I .._.) / ' ::-.) 6, C 12.4. TAY, LOT( ) ' 1900 0„„,k,14, ., 1 sbo _____ _____ . . - CIRCLE AS APPLICAWA: •, . . . .A._PL. ra C,omtER/ EVELOPEA'S NAME:IQ ''1V __6L ,L2Z:/A . — , • '7' •3 : ADDRZSS, I. 16 ?X _ti' W PA-chcfc 1-b,,I. -716 IN iez.c( M641.,,. ,.. (8r.R.88,t) (caT (sTAT5) (2/0) — ' 1, 7. . : ?SOUS (SUE.): e") ? 9 0 2.... 1 Lt SIGNATURE: 14,„,... /.... X,,„..),(.."‘'' ',_ REPF.ESENTATIVE'S NAME: , . C,. IfIrf_12_:„6-1,-- , ig e - 2,-6 4 e',- Z 2 . ,, , . , .. . • . •. ADOIR:T.8S: — ----,—.--.•—...__ , .,..................*...............4 . .(cItry) (sTAT.E) (ZIP) . livl-,•0E (EU4)1 , . US'."' s",' V'' C' ,,,, OatIV-r-,, - .4, .....,,,,...,_ ....,,, _ , , - . . , ., . . , • ' l'. .........' , .. • • •-.^. , V , • OSSCAIPTVD0 P' P.P.OFEP.TY * , .r • ' 05E0 USE 4auttotvGs uNI .8 , ''IL)..:L. .-1,LL,__96,1 • L 1 :L k 1,..„_,...., ..-ts q.A:\i , 1V14 , , ,..........,..****6..................*.,.... ■... ‘, .......14*■*. ') ■ .'"""'"77-." -----,. i . . " ' ... . ' ' ,----,- ,-,,,' - . . .. . : ' 11:1: 51g8: _.., ,,,,L,Q____:‘,L5 0E1 BUt.r.44465. // If sQ. FT. OF PAVINC1: 12Pe , St":Ft t.) LA0bStA'P;11: , L '/• -, 1.312._&;•Lt, # : MiTICIOA43 O.Sti0ZA 1:4'0 kr..!::`* '4,,..L.,.' E( % , : \'‘ , ' ,' ' , , • p,, ' ':.., CA tv . , 40 , " • C__- . , it _,) .. -----‘ • 11 1 , t. SL �rM ANDERsoN, D!T'T'MAN '&4 AANEDE R$QN1 ATTORNEYS AT LAsv TIGARD PROFESSIONAL CENTER 5965 a, W. CENT :R STREET P. 0. BOX 23006,.TIGARD. OREGON 9722S $39.1121 'RED. A. ANDERSON TDE�'RYCK,H. DtTTMAN June 1 3 919 ' >•�tCiGER F ANDERSON y 1. , Aldie Howard Planning 'Director City of Tigard r Tigard, Oregon 97223 I Re: Tax lot 1900, Burger Boy parkin lot • Dear Mr. Howard: This letter will confirm our recent telephone conversations which occured on Friday June 8 and Monday June 11, 1979 regarding this property. I stated that' l had specifically pointed out the ordinance requiring a conditional use application for such a change of use to Mr, Selby approximately two months ago, and had on a prior occasion drxvlen him directly to the property to point out its location and the previous attempts to improve and change the use of the premises without appropriate approvals by the City of . Tigard. A As l informed you on Friday June 8, preparations were being made to create a paved parking lot without a conditional Use permit , as required by City ordinance You informed me that Mr. Alexander had been informed and had agreed not to proceed with any work on the premise until a con- ditional use p er mi t was approved b y the City. On June 111, 1979, 1 informed you that the ps.ving was going on contrary to what Z had hadftieen told on June 8 1079 You informed me tha't Mr. Alexander had proceeded contrary to his statements to you. You further stated that Mr► Alexander would be required to obtain a conditional use permit . 'p rmit . I 1 I r I Please keep me informed of any action taken by the City concerning this property, x request that you inform me of the filing of any requests • r, t ... V u c, 1ss. u„nxn..i„ Yra vuk}.a. wwu .., .,,.. ln .. _ • x f n ly✓ ' 1 A 1 1 ' e �u, ,..:-1•...I.�..1,........1 .. ,..... _ ,.�4at_♦,.,.✓n„ ..t.... .._, n- .,..,i. A _.. .,..._,1.--.1• ..,..... , ...«.. « ... � x a� . June 13, 1979 . Page 2 • for conditional use permits of any other action requested or taken concerning this property , 3. . Very truly yours , ANDERSON, DITTMAN & ANDERSON • Roger F. Anderson RAF :ko } cc : Gordon Martin • • • • o k n ■ ■' vm:ra; !PAW* . ; CITY OF TIGARD • P.O. Box 23397 12420 S.W. Main Tigard, Oregon 97223 M-37 29' 1979 't22,1)1(.', T'- L11, John Alexander 6Z61 I 7 Nir 11688 SW Pacific Highway Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: SDR 25-79 Dear Mr. Alexander: • Please be advised that the Planning Director on May 25, 1979 approved your request for site plan and design review for an additional parking lot serving Burger Boy Restaurant. This approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. In the interest of safety and efficiency the number of highway • access points shall emain as they exist. 2. ' Landscaping of the slope (adjacent to Pacific Highway) is acceptable if kept to a maximum of 3 feet high to eliminate any sight distance %(\)° problems. In addition, the parking stalls abutting Frontage Road shall be effectively screened from the public right-of-way by a two foot landscape strip along the property line. There shall be no curb or sidewalk construction along Pacific Highway as requested from the State Highway Department in reference 6k. to letter dated April 25, 1979. (Exhibit "A") • 4. No changes will be made to approved plans or spidcifications unless formal application is made to the appropriate department and changes are approved by that department. Application for changes will be made in writing and shall include applicable drawings, engineering specifications and other details requested by the department, No construction shall take place in these instances until after the • changes have been approved. Any deviation from this condition will . result in the immediatu posting of a stop work order on the project or any portion of the pro3ecto • If we can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact this r office at 639-4171. SincereV, t 4 • Hilary Mackenzie 4 AsSiStant Planun. ' • Dave Larson • Waker Assiciates • • 1 • • • I • N.1 • I I r Page 2 John Alexander May 29, 1979 S ?R 25-79 I I I i II Note: The following acknowledgment must be received by the City of Tigard within fourteen (14) days of your receipt of this letter. Failure to return this acknowledgment may result in action by the City of Tigard. I hereby acknowle d g e this sle tt letter documenting the acti on o f the Tigard Planning Department. I have received and read this letter, and I agree to the decision l 01 • • here documented and to abide by any terms and/or conditions attached. 41111%4 I 4 r.... � y...r� Si. ature I I j Date rl DIIIVI • JUrN11197 CITY OF TIGA I'l..ANN N DE • . r I 1 (hl • .,,i.. _ . • -,i .i ,. .. - . .,. na. ,... .i.., ...+,. . .,I .., ...„3... . 4.,.. .. .::}...•,.nl....,..n a r.....w.•._.. s. ,• . w... .,.. ...i, . .,.._....w ` " • STAFF REPOIT • TIGARD SITE. DESIGN REVIEW May 25 , 1979 Tigard .City Hall 12420 S.W. Main Street - Tigard Oregon • Docket: Site Design Review (SDP. 25-79) Burger Boy Parking Lot Applicant: John Alexander, 11688 S.W. Pacific Highway Location; 11700 S.W. Pacific Highway (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 36CD Tax Lots' 1800 & 1900) ti. Request: Site plan and design review for an additional parking lot serving Burger Boy Restaurant. Site Designation: C-3 General Commercial Zone • • 1 Pazking: Pursuant to Section 18-60-160, minimum standards for parking stall length, and width, aisle width and maneuvering space shall be as '. follows: Overall Channel • Angle from curb Stall width Width ?isle Width 9.00 9'6" 19' 24' SITE PLAN AND DESIGN REVIE W The proposed site is zoned C-3 and designated Highway Commercial on the ' 1 NPO 44 Plan. The property is adjacent to Pacific Highway and surround- ing land uses include a vacant lot to the south and the existing Chalet Restaurant to the east. The project is in conformance with all Setback, landscaping, drainage, access and parking requirements. In terms of developmental constraint on the parcel, it may be duly noted that the site is situated within one of the proposed alternative 60 foot roadway as illustrated in NPO 44 Plan, Figure 3., providing a connection of Pfaffle and Dartmouth Streets to form a major east-west link between Pacific Highway and I-5. Future alignment of'the proposed intersection will be determined irregardless of the parking lot improvement STAFF RE COMA BNbATI ON Staff recommends approval of ti'e preliminary site and design plans subject to the following conditions: 1. In the interest Of safety and efficiency the number of highway access points shall remain as they exist: 2. cent Hi hwa is a� ., Landsoaping of the slope (adjacent to Pacific �'` y'� �i acceptable e any sight distance " " if kept to a maximum of 3 feet high to eliminate tancie problems. In addition, the parking stalls 'abutting Frontage koad shall be effectively screened from the public right-of-way by l a two ' foot landscape strip along the property line., II I I I I II I I I ' II ' • I _ _...,�,� ..•..-.... ...� . _...... ..,., ,..,u.•_ ..�..J..... <...,.N. w. .,� ..M .,.._,.� ...aw_ ,,. ..�.�...._.«a,.,.,.t, ......-_ .. w ..11..... I:......:.....J .,..�..� ,4. , I I r • • • STAFF REPORT � • �'�L'ICAP,D SITE DESIGN RREVIEW' I I I May 25, 1979 �• Page 2 3. There shall be no curb or sidewalk construction along Pacific 1 Highway as requested from the State Highway Department in refer-- ence to letter dated April. 25 , 1979, (E .hibit „A") �� • • Report prepared by: Azam Baabar. Approved By: AI•tgwowa,'.d P.Ia. irng Intern Pl.ti` ig reoto r may s,�119 79 � I • • • • • • • • • I , • I . I i r....wu•,nekwri+n«N .ei.ro.,W.,,..w,w,i_..n....+,.��...,.... • • a....�..�,.. r r r , .•.n y1(1' S ' a41Y }'+'-1'�M, ♦.. n , .. y{� 4ilf 1 ''4 x , ru,q " wry ivl,ra', ti�p4`dsrIfCJ�r {6y'h:l?wxrd 4,,,,1,4,.w' , , r,,.I r 1 h rway.'' f»n? 45 aA 6j,1 ! }ogy'0 1,A�r'+rc o 7i,c., ,, �y M y • • e'1,, 'I'll1'' ("',9,,,0,'',;.<�:C'.'1` 'ev!,!,f<d tti;:, 1.V•11 ,Ifi,;�` �t ' 1..),-,a .,i.),,?,„, , ' %I,w rl, r;, �r ',P., • C .CS�a�y1. M.' ., r ": An .XSI�`Cd`� t.( 1. r,..l, rrr,■a -4ipjr rt ....ti; _ F ' ' 1 Ykl'ir7 :A .Gl' {y 4{ y*, ' I t ', tit'. °:tix<.'r tiJb tlr." .f.,..,-.4,:,a",,`,1:. tiff 7'NESS ',/� ',"Il t.ti, I.w'"r,,Tt,ftlx,,ti'^'x /t., °1',,,k:11 ,,It'o,.J t, '+r, ;4,e t r?1' r'' "Y tr'r' ,„r,• ,'/1 tbtl? 1 ,A (s f>) +t°i/4l?'`11 tilt t`I,r{k 7 UT,i 1,1,r;'l11 f e4 µ v t' . l ( n2 '+ ? r,t t' Y / if ;It:, ;..1( 91t':F ,1,- 1 k�9 't Y' ..d,. ',1?'IC. I h,.'Citi1°..,Ni,',utf& to ,II't'95,k1,,.:Fric$1?11 4 i.,)Y<,it , .x 01 t,,',r.tt11- . to,.1.t IX; r de .! ,.� r. ,y f ' 4, ”" tr Y. rt.') x.1 t ..id,, .1,*,".+ w ,, .' 4.LY ,.f 44 ,. � w''.. '""r Y i Y r r .it, w .a., r,.. , i z .'..i.''.. a n,[ i,..aj4, ,, : l , , . 4 ., I ,'.t'., aX:, 'i.f ,+, ry °s; r,;„ .. ,!7, i" R.aG Cr.,1;« ,M},,4 t ' b." tr _ • r. L G" t.',1,r r .# p t''. ..r.t. I x,•, lu w, r ,'.�� . w r M r Y ,� # r.g .d br 1 �. r 1l Fr'_ r. 7 .+ IS'0,1.1. .1a.AIAY.7i.?-:—'b'. C x„ wV, , .r d r° ,,,,^, roa*. ,,'Art,be' ,,,•'r°ek^li". .,.-r. }} „ 1 i ' r yy . .,la r ,7 .',I ., w l 1 1. 1,'.1, x ,I.,., y• l i +,I ,l . 9 p..+ 1, • • • 1' r, , f:Yl'!.'Ni'.Y . .,, ,'la IA'^YN'f i'.1. ♦.,.,.rd ,V ,.,d rr .t .t r r' I , • • x m I i• f • r•.^1,,•' 41 I,.4 1 `AP,. i )f IA,"u ' '1 t ' ,1."" naM..^'."ir'x^•.n{.r».w,+.•-:r n.wYo-+.. w• r r r,ir+nsNw„,n^„"'r'"»"}'^»mam•r,r'",ww I . ' � � Ire t t 1 I i °k ak , t , ( l 1+ i �.. J . 1 i y. 1 Y i 1 .. 1 }, , j' d , 4 I i , 1 ; d �. 1 Y. ; 1 1 r i t ' ■ , • , t. ''' Q.�W'."f p {.� cJ ,era i � . . .�sy491 ,ti µ, ,m 1%4 4. ©a'%C n,,4` t 1 '��y(,4.” J ,�• ' ' r..) . :' Y G�t!ax m2c :i,-.• ra M+ FJ,13 uaal tiF c2 J k'f',', 5 1, .; ' aa Z u! 0 a wt ,J "1, , Yaut I` �� !" ,��,' t '" tL..7 ""°tin °r t CI g 5 . G „ s.,cci aa4 1'i ,«' u r(, '� " 17 ♦. ,„ w « ..,err • nr,+� 1� 4 0 'ty a 1, C3,,. C"'»k t y)'. .',., tJi' t)19'P,l,' ,J «' "F is+.� r F�:``i,r'.^F,c' ''i^yt 'ut �,r„ , tir:rP G 0;, Vrl, .,t' ''F,, (, J' F"edrot,tioiCt, ,,piJevrer.1 ' 1 , i tt'ho, t■tiit,t! ,ia'i)., btd�.irn., F' »,,t,Ytrlf't• ;q,,:, Ar,'41 (Y d .1,,,,„/,l-,t. •waaY,u,d , Ft; , n 1:1,r y,•,/,,;t,e'}J,a. . . "t..aci ltot hiinscf,,':Yt,tt not(499'for II If P,t,tdt+t,di,f gilt.It'I"tt tt.>` iid, r•Jr, x,.aP.!1 I' f'" ` prrrsidt■rtt ttnd (n,it t ice, Itt1(r9Y' i9 9,969 St?Grrttuy rf ' .hat 1 r,., I 11�'! tlitltrtt^' , t t, i , . Y { YIIY•:d rd,��l "t':,P:.I r ,1` e�xl'X IFr+ttrl 4• ell'7t) tFl.dt tF1t 9t'�i trtt:C 1 fly tf•G”FYir,•fi,ilft txlltlurl:'e`rt't is fP9k?"�tt'1'�•Ir'. ,F"i' Cif w,Uid trottit,r'Irtt,Y7 11r`i 94/191$.,4911 Itt9l11Y7'f"it t{tls dltfrt:KF.4 rni 5t"rtl,•c9 ,r lu• 1 half a!icidd'cot ttotiit urt by•»titrt11ortrl',:F i+ca/,card of dirt'»t,•it,w;nad ea,,,,,,F » '� , 1r?.{trri,a9Jld(:o)o'/F`rd N:IGd trt9ttuttt.lt,tlo,hi tr'i ""rifttrttrr!}' not ,:11,1 ,'4,991'. L liolurP,.0101 d P �. 'gyp, L,t Y d`t'' r,, 'C, »„,—.,.. �i,"'1. R 1,1 P.x ,'» t. ri /Vttury Jyltblic For Ore,'oil,}rv' v, }P/rty r �"F '' d4�Y I:oY77ntibtiutt expi"r., 1f{{ C 4 d 'ak,,,,r'•,`i}' {f «t!YMA9'ay 1 I �, .,,, ,'., 4, -'..',:(:!,;'..,,IiEN'',.'.!it,,:ili,4,41'1",:11,!,!,-.., , ` Y • 1a�-. ,...., ,.,.,..I.« w,a;:s. _ a,,.. :; a >>"r• I , ° CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Engineering Division Operational Procedure S U3JECT o GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLIC ANTS Obtain, and a. read attached City of Tigard Ordinance No. 74m14 entitled "An , e+rd:inance prohibiting' bxcavations 'in City streets or alleys without a permit; prescribing procedures for obtaining; permits; regulating size, location and construction of driveway approaches, sidewalks and curb..cuts; providing for variances; requiring restoration and maintenance of excavations in streets and alleys; prescribing penalties for violation; fixing effective date." Copies are available at City Hall via the City Reco r�-r for the nominal sum of (none) each. 2. Obtain an "A m - Street It roveme�'t/'Excayatiozi" form. Copies are available at City Hall at no charge. • 3n Read (attached) the "Instructions for'Completion of Street Impotrement/Excavation • Permit Form"; then complete items numbered one (1) through five (5) on the application form. If in in doubt regarding, any of the five items,' please ask for assistance. Your application will be reviewed and delay thereof may be contingent upon the information you supplied, 4. Submit your application (to the clerk) and pay the required deposit (cash, check or money order). Retain the receipt, as proof of deposit. Please be aware that upon. review of your application, adjustment of the application fee may be necessary. 5. Await notification of application review results. If notified that additional or supplemental fees, bonding, information or plans are required, the application must comply or the application will be voided, 6. Upon notification of application approval, the applicant may pick up at City Hall • one' copy of the approved application (pink); being the permit "form" therefor. Note, special provisions may be stipulated thereon. Also, obtain and read "Instructions Lo treet mr ovemenl/Excevation Permit Holders". Permits must be posted conspicuously on the job site prior to the start of work, or where not feasible, in the custody of a 'respansibj.e person present at the job site. Failure to comply with this requirement will be grounds' for closing the job down; • • � q I i i I • ...«,...,.,..„„....,w.,.,,.,.•.....,W.....I.,,.....,.,,4.n,.....w,w....:».......,....,...,ew...✓.n,..+«... we,:.w...,11...,.,..t:',,'t1. ,.,,...n. .,n. .,i....ro„, .,,,.. u.,b....Gr.,i,.e.,a.i.x..uulm.. . ,i,.l,,. i ,,, .,.,.,... • • • • • • , T OT L'4,,'YR) OREGON • 1 . Engineering DI�Ia�sx.on I , Operating Procedure 1 `f � 1 t �....�rt:.T� INSTRUCTIONS Fc�l�. COMPLETION OF STREET 'LMTSTtOVl�N1LNT FXC r�.CIOt� i��'�tM:T i. �0�.1`a O.U1tlrww..,r�,.rwr.,w,1,Ml n..r Wnw.Y,r M.y rwv r.. a r},4 W,1i.rr ,r'wr1r FM,r'.w..wn+.r..w..rulMrMa.rvu«w w�,�..ti.w.rw.w..r+1..r��...w..w,.� G, Insert "curb"; }tdJ4i �w`,y 1�,tt; 'driveway II''I. ,�y yA' p�ry'p�y qq ; y ., .4:` +.,,.M. ,.•.,,,,,,'v. '� t� 9 a'+wwUy I�Y1'�'�Y'�.'c,J.�tPy ltdr�i.��4�Y1�"".�r� ,�.,,v�,l,�ni�q "sidewalk"; "gutter"; "drop box", "culvert"; "sanitary sewer' "storm sewer"; water, gas, electric, phone line; etc. . . .' b. Insert specified (proper) namas 1. 1 e. John L Dos or '.3 Dc c'' and addresses (i.e 10OO D S E Work Ave. , Tigard Oregon 9'7223) and phone, Bombers c , Irseu t;. t,rle es a,leela t d total cost o'" improvement inc 1udi x, ma;'eric.,1v labor '�r +; ND. f' a n rL s e "i. e x c 1"a,v a,t S _1 II.Ir+ xve r tM wl'Iw 4. i b. Insert .s{ L t. t r strt,et r r e n at 1 and c l o s i r dates, i`; ,.,.}!Vca.:w. a. Ins<<rt. `l-owac in;' date, and attach a e„apv thereto. If the cost ..)f the i7.Pri'a\w:.rr'en'r. is in Five hundred dollars ($500) and if upon review or .he appiaat.ion ,its is determined that additional ',ondin.; is nec.os srSl, the a.uoiica'nt: 1"1scSP' he not ? ied that said work may be cons fete„red ,a ttma'or, i ,)roli'cnent. .onstrue.tion project” in lice of a "street ooen:ir„,,,tt T' `t `" » ; a. 1nc l,.:et'e +tcrt ;re1t,t data or ttta i plans or plot plan SKetct sheet to Lice appt i-a•taon. etc•. - the City may require full constructior mans be submitted In lieu o'` said sketch upon, review o: a. S.iL,In elne',l dI;,ft.e Li ( ep1.i(w"e1.ioe r Subatit it to the clerk- 4' IF IN DOUBT, PLEASE ASK FOR ASSISTANC E • • • • • I , , I ' i I l�,j/ ,..,wi.,,w.,w.w.,,w.,.:.,,..w..n,,,,,xrl',w,;w'•„u,.,,,,w„a, ,.wu.,„..nw,.,w.'„ ,..nr• (.4 I lA •• , • • . . . . , . , 4 ■ • .. Present Problems with Cor=tirs_I Dartmouth Street , • to Pacifislliglm Jr/a through Tax Lot 1900. I 1 Tax Lot 1900 has been paved with the approval of the planning department, • however, the department did stipulate in its approval document that the paving . . will not affect the placement of a roadway through the property. Nevertheless, ' from a practical standpoint the owner of the Burger Boy Restaurant no longer has , . . any need to cooperate in the establishment of the said Pacific Highway connection because he now has fee simple type parking in contrast to short term leasehold . - ." parking. • It would have been reasonable and correct to maintain that Policy 32 of the , • Comprehensive Plan provides that the intensity of use of "involved" properties : shall not be increased until the complete Dartmouth/Pacific Highway connection . is established. Paving should not have been allowed until the road connection . problems were satisfactorily :esolved. . ., It is just as reasonable and correct to maintain that the paved area should not be used until a conditional use permit is granted. However, we do riot believe that a '- - City en erced blockade of the paved parking area would be understood by the i public. The City would probably be accused of unreasonable tactics applied ,. , , against a small business for the benefit of big business. Also, the conditional use • , . . • • permit would have to be denied to have an effect aimed at causing cooperation. . . • •, Furthermore, now that parking is available on Tax Lot 1900, Tax Lot 1800 and 1900 can be sold for C-3 uses which do not require a conditional use permit. . ' Therefore, we believe that the prospect of cooperation by the owner of the Burger Boy Restaurant with other property owners to establish the necessary • a,* right-of-way within an acceptable cost range was lost with the granting of design . approval for paving. .. The alternative, if the roadway is to be located through Tax Lot 1900, would seem • ■ . to be through eminent domain., However, now that Tax Lot 1900 has obtained a , . parking use intensity level (even if not formally approved for restaurant use) a roadway through TaX Lot 1900 would most likely require payment for the business located on 'Tax Lot 1800 which is dependent on Tax Lot 1900 parking for its . . guaranteed continuance. Therefore, the city could expect to have a potential cost of between $250,000 and $450,000 to obtain the roadway' through Ta Lot 1900 via the condemination route. This of course is not a risk the city can afford to take. . , In reference to eminent domain it is conceivable that a forced trade could be • : , arranged so that Tax Lot 1801 Would be traded for 1900. However, this approach because of multiple ownership rights, time problems, and possible legal precedents • is too complex to have much likelihood of sUccess. , Practical Considerations Even though traffic capacity arguments can be made for and against Where the . . • connection should go, the underlying consideration (now that Ta x Lot 1900 has i been paved) has become one of availability of right-.of-way Washington County deed records at recording numbers 78055158 and 78055159 of 12/18/78 prove that , )• ' right-of-way cooperation between four, property right, owner entities has resulted in making it possible to provide a right-of-Way connection at Tax Lot 1801 which•. is 75 feet wide at Pacific Highway narrowing evenly to 60,17 feet at 114,57 feet south of Pacific Highway, , . , , 1 .......... • . , ,f. . .,) ,--, - 40 n _ I ( J •0 4 a . . . , •. . . . . , . . . . • . . , , , . • . . . • • • . J 5 e i . t Although, this 60 feet meets the comprehensive plan Minimum requirements it , I would be much better to have at least a 70 foot right-of-way for the first 225 feet , or so south of Pacific Highway to allow increased, destination separation into different lanes in order to maximize use of traffic signal, green time on Pacific Highway. The owner and lessee of Tax Lot 1700 which is the Chalet Pancake Restaurant property have agreed to make .03 of an acre of their property available for the . roadway in return for access to the roadway from the south line of their property via a parking lot service drive. If the owner of the Burger Boy Restaurant was , , required to provide the same amount of property in return for the same type of . access, as a condition of obtaining the Conditional Use Permit he presently needs or future design approval for some other use—then a 70 foot right-of-way minimum could probably be obtained at minimal cost and dispute either , . voluntarily or through eminent domain. .. . : The Comprehensive Plan shows the connection through Tax Lot 1301 with Pfaffie . • • realigned to said location. Correspondence with the Oregon Transportation ., Department appears to expect that the city will guarantee the Pfaffle realignment at such time as west bound left turns into the "Triangle" reach 250 ' per hour. Therefore, it appears that before the connection can be made to Pacific . • Highway at Tax Lot 1801, the City must require the proposed redevelopment of • the "Marine Lumber Company" property to include realigning Pfaffle. The importance of immediate action is that if the City as a condition of ' redevelopment of the "Marine Lumber" prr perty, does not require the realignment • • of Pfaffle then it would seem mandatory that the connection be made through Tax Lot 1900. This as explained above through failure to prevent paving of Tax Lot . 1900 until the roadway problems were all resolved would place the owner of the ,... . Burger Boy Restaurant in the position of controlling development of the Triangle". Such owner's past track record in regard to prices and cooperation, • . ' and his statements to the effect that this ''Triangle" situation is one chance in a . life time--would appear to make it likely that construction of the roadway would , be inequitably expensive and difficult for everyone. I. it is difficult to answer the question of whether a "T" intersection or a full " . . , . . ' intersection would be best from strictly a traffic viewpoint because of the high volumes of traffic on Pacific Highway. If there was sufficient space on Pacific to . accmodate the volumes of traffic that could enter and leave the "Triangle" area • , via the Dartmouth "extension" during its allocated green time, then the "T" intersection would be unquestionably best providing it was at least 700 feet from i ; •,., another intersection. , . However, it L not uncommon to observe periods where no west bound space is available on Pacific Highway during P.M. peak hours ih the vicinity of the , 1 . ( proposed "Dartmouth extension" intersection. In this type of circumstance the full intersection would be better because it would allow traffic, that did not have space to proceed on Pacific Highway, to proceed instead on Pfaffie. This .' opportunity to proceed on Pfaffle would be particulary important if the proposed . i. h., new connections to Highway 217 are not constructed. Since: (1) whether or t'.4`zot , . the proposed road connections to Highway 217 will be made, will not be known in the immediate future, (2) existing buildings preclude eXtending the existing ' • , Pfaffle south, (3) the Oregon Transportation Department is requiring realignment , ..,„,_ of Pfaffle when left turns off of Pacific Highway reach 250 per hour; decisions must be made now to prevent the possibility of losing the ability to construct a workable intersection. ,,.. . ‘,. ■,, • .2. , ..... ( , - . , - . fr ) . • ,..., • If the "Marine Lumber" property is granted design review approval without the realignment of Pfaffle being a condition of the design, it will as explained above become very difficult, if not impossible, to provide an intersection acceptable to • the Department of Transportation. • Conclusion The safest and resentl most workable`,solution is that of: (a) enforcing location p Y of the intersection as shown on the Comprehensive Plan Map which is at Tax Lot 1801, and (b) requiring realignment of Pfaffle to this'point as a condition of redevelopment bind/or additional commercial zoning of the "Marine Lumber" property. Only in this way can the overall continuity of the Comprehensive Plants road system be maintained and protected. • • • l r ' ' \ I U • „ ,x.,, .4,:»;1,- + ;w.w + j . . -'' k,,,, 4,,eitif.„,. . , , r OtTC”? '' ''. '' r I 6"'401")' 44.'nf ' . e,,,did6...'daheo,-;'./', , , , , , , i . , ,, 4, ' , ' E n n' } • 5"-r, . .1,q�r1 Y 1. I ' '''OZ,,!) 43O yAy • rt I• fI t.''''',.';-:::?`' A� CC ✓ G C /, M j,.I , 4 999 i 1 I. , ,: 1 ■ r 4 ,, i' . ' ' 1''2417:7'''°1 1°*'417°J'''.r''''''..'.:-'''": ' 1 . ' , , , • ...„,/, . , , :r, I 1 '. 111 it I i f • 1 ..,,..«.w. ,M.,.,,,.w...w,., u..,.,,,a..,w:,u,.n,,,...".n,uw.'a:.,,i..,.,r�i,u.,.i:.e,w,.n .,_ :.,f" ..,,,., �.. . .,••..i..,.,, ,r, i. r , . . CALCOLATOR ., . „ , " . . STARTING cooRD.:,.,ii,',, (WORK SHEET) PROJECT NAME '. N. POINT "s).`{ ,w FILE NO. E. POINT STATION NO..._w..m ', TA. N0. BEARING C�dS°T. :LAT.SIGN CEP SIGN'. ANS`WIE6� nom to degrees Ili:IM seconds i fi t. re tn.N. GOOR D. E. ®0 R D. , - ° e °� t; \ to�9- 9' 3 Z +1 Eg ■ � o , . , , 0, ,....., ., , nog, rin „, f. ,. .t , III .) ,"„” ____________,✓ .::r. , inn ' ( b . a I. 0/k,,.ryw i ,, l , , ,,,, as L44 4. # 2 1 .4. ; imi 011 •, 7+, C Y tt al ■ ta f 1 0 �` } 1 sketch on bock ' . ,1 • it hM N 4 0 J n r 0 • . , •, v P ( b Q e 111 ^ "I' ', I. 1 „ r /r i • • • A , S�tY1�MAR. n. . nr+ S: . p 14 lEt' pp, • • . :/ v • • ,. i 1 • • ,I• 9cALIC - NoVIilIONB, oV CiATt' d 4 bN'N, cko, Cb i wo, Ap . Z tITI.e NO,, . Z I. A Y • a ' i , , . r' . 1 1 i •/ • . , . . , ("). • I � I I \ "0 • J re 1 s • y .,,,J 1..w.,. _„��,.....��,«t:..- i......»�.},a �.n?•,-r,�y 9c,'»: -tLU.- Il .7"?'"--'---- a f 476.14 // 1 0\: ry r r c. 4 0 0/ _, a t� s. etAL(44 .1,4t.z. %IN.: ..,44.A.y k 4',w�1:1 1 I :,7. .7;; � 'd�.ti IN ,98 A c. 1 • 04 y byb 0,/ `fig na\'hJ �0 • 0 ..7 , r y X to w.. Jp a1 N 0 L)43V r , ,. y�''-- aU ,.= .45 4cr „, .../. . 00/ 3P t.3., .2, • fir' ✓'" �,t 1 � 7 ' 1 0d a 1601 rn ° .zr �,. • .F5An . ,••s .�l r �� 15 1 ', ,L * • 9' 'E'' A* ,% ;1:e::: p ,91.954°c-ti :,�?C cri 6I 1801 .\ ul X `: Ck' 1'8 0 0. :3/Ac, "' \` ', �' '. ,, ." , No CI � ' .l r h ) s d ,l �,� � �.+.+....... ',f A 218/130s W� �S l 3°2 2'8 5� CQFM , 6 iti$,.r,4',14.'",l°!b� 1 J � i# .'a+' r- , �41�'w 1 a � t` 1/4""• , . .'%..'!�M1�r.`ii �✓; i, n/!Y/i' /f.F / ,41��Wii4i/51,. � ✓ Yn-7P\ y ,}��4 ',', 5.6:1.4: j GV p J . ; 8 l76.a J 13 A.i t/ 268.42 `___..-1,,, ',4f.y. '' 1 \ 0 03811■4$ 200 1 • ; 'j 1 o 'j . ti. g li — . 40 ,,,,...),....•:i,.....:,„..o.,:e.d.e. - / / , • 2c ,71 ' -.•.-- 3 4 144 .«... ....$ .-+..... `�,i 2;000. .�.. .- �,2 `' 9r,5 ° , t 74 4 `�`: I iti+ , ti 4. 14.0 1 4, \ `titi: t x r • J .0 ( I „ . ,....,---''' t1/41,IT, \ rw • --' L_ .4X .�,' �x yi � . Ii\ 6 ,.�. .•.•. '1� u-,i "1!, ��•.r r«,I� ..� f••r,.X't.,.4.. „h.... .w ''1 _T -...4 q44,� •..,1. \ i •,..0../ ' '•.,.. '44"....1' ...,_ \ r ,\1 \ , 1 °.t.. " /,�w,1l/)')" -,,, I ^ '',y , ,1 \, \' � •,y1 'fir.^ "_` ' ( ;, �,' , /' !r� 1 1, \ ,1, \ ,, 111 .,, \' 1 \ .\ % '' \ \'\ \''' l' t f N �. W C.I. O \�,�y \ ` `_'1. / I \ . �'/ 1 it • r .ri.c�A,; ,.4(,. 1y.4i' raj",A` . W \ �� \ \i. F N, 1 (� \ �to 1 • ,.,NOr••:� `` qy L _ $ �� . T c�'' �\ �r yl \� rid, ..,...., ,1 °.CX r�r `� ( `. , \ ..,". •‘ 1 k , 1 Q 'le, �r "� y ,' \ �� .. 1 �' r'\ m W '%y ya d,�4 I -....,,J. („ lit. ',.. 2 ,dopizApirk,„' .,,. , ' ... . . — A , , ,. ,,,...e.'XI Ly..,,,, .." ''':/''''''\'''''''1., ...r.V....2.1.,' y,j•".7 y` r 1".a , ,g■ .t•/' M �. 1 / ' ,,: ,, I a __ma..:—`. �i,' \\ '.8.,..,,,, 'I a. ' ill \• '1,..4 r + 4 , „y11I' 1l1\\\\ 'l t \ y, CD ,jje,p<;),...., PI \ \ ' N •• ' li , ''4,1 , q,'",,V":.,',. '” N 't• 0 \:10011°■ 4 I. * { L. w iy ) / d! \ ,;• r"....:'''' A 1 , '''.. i , . 1\' .',..,_, \\\Q, , ; r . d , -:„..r , '-_.i - -.'-' ..., ,('i ,, \ 0 '''''. ''t*•\,,''' (IL.\j„. ", . . ,�r� ;� �� ,r, ��, N I � } r ..� _.�•... . r� w _.� aj yt Ni. -# i 11/4 ' / "I C1/4\i‘\\ .\111 >i -- \ 1/4,,\, }c ',4.,„,''•,'1/4.„_ I , . et, , 't 4, \ . ,.. 17) ...„., \,,k,,,, ' '' i r ‘( / --- \\2`:\ ■),.. y. p, I / ,-..,14 --- ''''''1 \ '‘. k,,,\ ;''. , ' ,^.' ,-.. 1:j.1 12,,, ' r.11, 11—ji-J --, , /'..,t, - I r: J`' `: to kt "�tel, - to ; ' '' ° l """ y r ? 41, .", ,,.'''''' '1i �,�/.,'' to , alw'f,�, .,�^W"'„_„ . ..,:w..°.»"�"^.„ .�.....� ,, .�.w.. ... ,1 ,,. e14,.. ,:';",s o M YtalxM„.,� ,.., ',L AI, ti C A.. :1+,•i•u• :4,4;44,..,.Z.1;.,. :,-,., '„,.m•` 7 •i77''Et',.'4H, 1�t✓4 :,_.r�.. ., .u, - i ... �\,. -.w. d .-.l.w:� =U r:'�ny7:'M*Fih �. ';t+n r' v'" �"-ktKY�`�r•�}„ e ple�r:.'�.....-....��,.�, .03Ac { F'' Y, m , yEa 6� ' ''' t t:':):.1 O m I Q 7 ;'�, ,, p'a 5 40.2 N N Q` wz $ 1r 1". . .58 Ac I4N e ti 1 11 ruQ .r a y ,( � 4° i �o 0 /1�a1 O 1 5 2,18 O � , m 121,08 31.08 0 y" �' IIS,2 . 1300 i a m �, X29°4pe'K 31 Ac. N ��' ,e 0 1 W q1 i' 'I4�.. •. `i Q C, ttl O o r9 ' 1 I100 to El' 5y�p e ,� .85,4ct .30 Ac, a I3�"o ■ ``�4, O''' �' \ • • o, a' 180E .4 1. �,.�' 18 0 n '314° ,fl ' N Ih N 0. .21,E 4,I'11.°' .F4,,, ry �� o 11 �6�' u∎4. acb.� \o a „ co 19Q0 ° \- �o t,°aE .32 Ac: y�� ∎ vb \ �,,y -o I,, Ts 89°22' 6vp ons `-• i"r'! 4ti1a�'. 56.7' Cy• ,F A°�,°�� Z66,42 47YJAi V'liis%r i, r`.:is"'; .� 2„�`' 5.54 Ac, ;., 2100 �; 1,00.4c, t. ri r:, - ?;;,t'S86°40'E • ,. `-1 , t::t k.�2300 �' e ti''''1I11�� N 87°41'W , 1 111111 a. • `N to ,.1;:..; p`..-'^-------_......._...7 Cie• s Ii;:I to ,t Lo N88°i8''10"E , ! --- 344..88 I C� l�III�N11+ kr 200 t�`` _'" �_. "----cv 6 41 0 0 < 2000 't, • 'd Ii - �; `"„ ao 1 3 h 18 141.3 6 a � : . sT 2 1 t- ' X500 f,s y �1;'ts ., (y' . :a �s° i ru 4000 a ,,. •r i >n , q M Lt_, In ¢ 17 i55,9b ''; it; �' q 90'86 2600 tt:�� ;v j 3900 0 N ,g U • , . • : C4 I' i , O r 'i d :N W OuI6 131,51 V,,T, f 38 0 0 N • 27 017 . `– — -- 3_ P �`'ti' ` dip tv `" �. .�. 9' w ay �J j\J2 iv,„' ��=. °' `'rn ''. m i. y�y 1 4'2,97 4'° 15 rt6.b1 _ ; ,.,.., ..,.- „t ��,, ,>.-. :',.,4r. t,`1 , N 471 0p .-I L^EOO �'r 1 ( -n ``'4? , �,".',P, µP.e p n • 1i h� Y 1:` 'r"t,,'S e,:'.F; '• ',ZF',kr t r' F':e ltd 1(1 • 1 1� -�» '"' !4. w S ine ,�„H.. .i$4,ID ',M , .� N jou 1, (.yl ? . b 4, �1 76 5 �, 14 1t3,1'J (.`` K1 s '"' , t; t 1✓ y 0 z 2900 .I io ' J600 h, ,t 1 J su1 d �:./ F�� L i n U -.ti f. W n N, �,t6.za °.. 'l 13 14 ,4 4 3500 N w N88°1�5'2d E .0Cr) ' 000 n= .L1 _ � 1 • 1k e`, b ut '�4 4.1 �' 't' 1 f Y 161,4 8 'k N '�y;�12 '� t +, .'N5ga5'2 EJd ., '--`" . » ✓ 0 0 �� 4, 6' qd r 1 j t 0,F I,';. a� 1 iai �t E A' w r\'.4 !:.i, � d* 3 0 e °0 . , m f 1 Fa ,tot E �o s 014 �a I 1 .` �' , b-a 1 � I,. 1 N 0 0 8 ,49,s9 c-6.91 31 O0 . r I, w �d 3200,4 , . y L l _ i, ,' G ks grfl.., M I T r'r p d•V o r" I.' '., � .. f� , �Ir Ir 1 - .._ - .,•. 5` �j.'Y••. t.,rte_, "r t / 0 k off... G', . 1 v�.LuG t ':::,,,"01 `I 'al ;,1� ya:/r '�I// Q ' r a v a `ti rlN U N "� J , ',.. " r f ' qa^ 1.0� 6, ' Y'FI'YI 4? •-1 111 ."1.',4,,..',/'''!';;a.• ..,t1,...":. I I �,. .li t '..:1'.. ,?•,' , : / ,„,,,"('''\''' """ . / a .,'rli'.'n'• ,f� :% *i1ht AV r II / / NNr 1 '„.,..$,,,••,..:;,:4.4'aR..,,, ',.lo`•r '•...i +��, '/ ,,...---�7t0(✓d SE•f.} r'( � (t<'GA '��k"" '•. - . .'r' A • 1 v--1.-. 25''t:1LLET,Ff::A --�� .»�_��_ 4;e4.160 L- f '� ll�h a"o4P.4l,fse, \1�+ ,.11,1t.'.,!till �} F '1' }.t bo.,4P CJK Wf 7/ „, i t:lr•1'''"� »y W+,•r �•1'•.S ''''''',41 t•t 1,1 1 p�"t h"O hIF1t1 1:IJ ...:"•1+.,',;1,••c1'1+4�)"`. ?y S•t'•'rPr;a*r.:.»'✓ +.•t •"S 7 �, �,�• . ✓}t 1J, II.YrwYlll•,;,,, r~ 1 }S 4..1 1 /v%' , v.} .w 11..r°:r:'�.,I•*,•••ysa t r,"`� i'.4' �..• 1 +�. 4+ �a s11'},11f1.1�, + .. "•�v tit..i�lyJ"f�„1-Iy 1t,•irh"1�`` q{l.T� �'•','?'.1�'�. ri / �^ �''` .,i, i r t, ;i1' '1.^ '� ...y , f.° .P.,'4, , 4 11 L' �` 41.' «..,•,j I. t`I1i3O,”, t,ll, '`�'1 { . I I 4.;•r,'7{ 11,`„11.1 ''.x•.•.11.,1,1'i,I ''1' �i'?t!,:1.h^,.4,•.,ai,wiu'1..,,';+• ;;Vrtt'Ai+�,•'t14,�•”,": r't „ _J,'�:ii1�f': :�t „r•,,. ' ,41 zhl. •—.r... �',ij1•` / , ,l,;I,.•r,,.,^ ,.1� 1 1 .�?'',� ',11 );;;,'?1:0;1' !1 r.. .1'1;11 y�'J(,� ,ty.•:�•!h7,.1 �r MIL. .?' .,,� •� n 1•sWl Y1/w ,r'��.r...'F•I AyIr�1` •*"y� t .(1i', 1. .I tj .1� '11 1 1 '•) 1.SA-1,1 •TYwt„.4..., + .Y'11• (,•:. '1�7.Y'.,.n+ 1 v. 1i. �d . G 4r l:.1N� '`, 1111�t �, , .1 ,,,t, I•' I, '�� I' � 4� �.'"'G•'; u ,... Ki. ,,,,,J �.. t} .�`,4•i .;-� ,..1 �.....-,Jr L 1,})i r y';, .1 1. ,�'./ '-,; Wt '" ••;...i }1.74��.' y.. .,.1»•'6. • ,C,;';.'"''' �f.,'.•�'r .:. 4,a Gj r 1't� ;. .1 � •».`..�1•.-t.•14 �� 1.1.0 1•,•1iii,I ;,.1 "f+ r. 1.sr,'y�� •'�;:�1 •±;�4ic..•" .,ey.�.zr.r1+�M. +.. .r,. •.!;: G. �.,;;� .jgr�r•� •, . 1 3I,1 t� `1'H1•.. 1!t,., N•f y i 1 J/4 1,.1.`4 ' ,.1 ! a' »;'f 1•�`'•':.1.".,.1� f".'; .•1 �i�•e-,. +Yi wt�k �• ,.iZx F 4''''14� 1! ., •^ .i f1 , �•11 1-"•w ALU1, r1` 1.�» .z 4 �,3 41, 1 ..a'4t ti.,' ��M e, �. ; '�••.w".�'+ �"Pr>w i ,111,, i',11•,'F I• ti.:t1':,..,.:h".'-e-.. .l.y�.';a.+�Y,'"r.,"' I'�_ ..l 1:t;,..9; '1''/4', � „'1'("1•L•.. .1:• ,PL".+-1sv.rt-{.•. ,Ij,�,. .,∎"-i{:4 ;f f t.. 4 i ,1. ,y ,i 1•' I '•, 1—'T_'r' j'I'�l>r ,I..y,.y,•,; a . -•M '1: +.41.1'.4, '' w• ""'•w.'�.il J» y A . ••�` 'y.+ titiJ..,,,.:j •C,r. • ti �"P"�"w.'"""'"w'a..,y•'I J'a � �1 y(,.5.1 , 1 I! •. .. '" ' ,, t �ifj:` l,�k Y �... .cs�»„�1. •'•1 lu;I�,:cGg�"�.,u�l /''� !4�;r�?�,y' H,' CJ . Ir. ! ',, ,• 1 '.•r t,, �C ,""r t 'i`.�.° ••, „k ,. fir:.. =.,'r �'� I; 1' �: ,, ar � �, ''� y X31 .. {; i.sl �) , `F. ax.,cC't� »+a•,• ..' 1+'a za, a : f, ,. /It�� (t . , •, , , ' .1 rl. .''...k'1 : `�..»�1;,,1,'G^••M�•.k••' „�2�i.t..f 1'. Zti:1L'Yn' {, .i•�� !/.>e'+.+4''-.GF: ':. �! '(5 .y', w• p:.' a'..; '1d7+.,a,. .r . ' l , )' , ....-.1a-.4.1.„,:—.14,22-,.....4,, r .. 'f it ,A•"'''”,*".♦•'1, 1.t:1: r"» ,.7 P;t 1, ' i.A'1�:,'•, ti ti!P ,i •" ,."1 w 7,,Z.F/fT4.h41.2 } '•Y u, 1 rl: ,1 1 aW .."'''.'v.r».Iil.,.. I 1 *3 ,; ...rn flr 'T' '•1.,.:,••, •at: , t. 't} .t,,?'i' ��•'•1M' `1lJtY ,ma '-. i1.-.. ------ ,�".,+'�1Y�..'' /;,..,..,....,---- Y". -•"-"y-..�: ��'•1^•.1�»••+tir�.;..1,� ..•. ... ta. ...a��..�i'w..✓... -' '�'�t•��.'yi:T+•, .+'rc'1�'!�h'rlt:,tl':r•'}�'M'C��.i"C,h+�ywr,,,,«..;;F .y.�titit X t�d;:l/ ' `",',"•;•'•'•�,I..e+.��,:»`,-�._ �,. . �Y�.'1..:'1.Y:.t...1..._+...i.'':.:i'C'::.r`"`I'' }.''�,�r'"'Tt'^''' '+,..q.�..,,. h`'•y' ;'h�'.,�•,Y + •t"4'A: '•'nr p'"'t^'�"r�' �1.�• • •a I JT- 1.1 \ 1, . . ,, \, ' ' ' 1 ' • -�^° in / \,.e\ , . . , I <.•7: 4( (,./ . " A 4 li..■4... • . . • I y •' . T P ,1�• .. • • h , '.,,�.i„- .: ,...� u....4444 .1.•.�.. •� 4444. •.., . .., ,, .,.i , • ...� .. ., . ,44,,,44. _4444.. ., .•.:, , . �„ rr .. ..,,it ,., .,, �,i ,..,., .,•.., m lY • r 1,. ')' '. ,, / 1/\ 4 .I. / / / /y '' ' 4:7 ..t. \ ''(VIty‘ 0 '4'CJUIa i2 e'.5 U)..1L'�, MoNI)1'\!';1`•! I `/i'fl 1....17. /`1 l r T�'�/ T AREA PROM I G r.! ■t f.al 11.1,: (f1 \,/1 25'RAGIUS pT 3+ f b y 1 1 r"(" f G6RNtK 0� W/14NUT ' ` t� /+ f ,r' E'xlsrING g/} �`' Y ;,I..�:. , r rr } \ _ 1hp„_-_.�._... (C I.�1L I� 4+161 - j 't 3 fir, ••r' '' , 11"`'i,•„( �; f , l iSr� I ,,t. 't 3A1 r i I x ,, I y q. ,.• A)■I ,t )).. rr /-{: _ ' is .',rl , •�it, ' ti'1, 'I ur irtl•.. , I�f r li� J', y .:�., '4. l/. 'I ! r "• ,f r '+ �/ :r:l ((I r. - ''} , r t-`I , •/r •!. _ ..'''•_�' iy ii ,. ... _«..,....... ... �. _ .+,,_,._,,,....,,r,.....;;,.,,,,1i 'I.'. 1`,,' ., ! ,' X11'•'+1 f +`"'II,y,I,�141, ':, s• r" ^4 .c. /.11, 1 rr , "";r'771/4,', i `. '.M. ,.,',or 'ir1 l'� ,i'' "'e)1f• I�Z' �4},r f .... WT'1 • ,„1/467r:..._..w•.i� .'{ r� 41 JI r� I•�h=.� jIv;'�rr"rl,� �t"� } .r I ,,‘,4,11.^:1,0,. (°t'`t ��', �r�' •;l�!'" 1. f,4,''`,,. r''1 I 1 .1; _ )ti ., 4' Jff ,. "ifW'�t1 y(• ',Ir,.'.V )114 rte •,,k1t `�S' t -ri. .°:.i r.f,4.1 � ": '�'y' ��• )/( t,, ,,' _ 1': , till'I�:''''�rl tyl�,.I1, l' .,�{r�'Si N=.�«M1r�`�'I'( �y .P,'i', ..r},i�,f' • it li f+,�1»,. ri��, yFr.� 1. i„✓('..�:.,.-,. niI e'/ I f ..} '4'i .. ' + i` , 'i, ,f:, ,it, !wM1-+..1 f rJ' '4" " 'I'',c' .r ,r;'r,y " r .t c�,,1`'A`,'•:{t, Y, ril'4y ,;,..t,1 ,Ir � _ , r s r 1..,.,..rn. I '.„i',,p J.,Y4.', r,� 1. ,,'+ YI' + ,, !Ir',f<` h,,,i R rrf,' , r f'. '° ':,N'r '� P' 1{,t2 1 r'r rrl . ` :,+1,I., , , 1 wry I.'1.+1 »-4.'y,L''''r„}rn j'i„.. i i!T�rr•''i i"1• y e "• '; F"1 r, '•,1•p. (',• ,, (r •! 1, tt4U�':. 1•'�•J�rA..,rl G,hulf.11011,-" i-", �'�4, +„ '! ,'1',t•r f rF'1,'�1,'f Ifi t i .'11,j.'. ,}7`,'"•^-,........,....., � r, 1' I •I' , 1 Y5� L.f�,.r'.�., .jr. t,..!7s"J n..4' 1 ' r. �r�I�r,'. 1 = , fi\1 I t s%fl p1a i ''1 r 1 u.. rJ k ,i 1 F.,-,M,r r 1 I `'+'• M1. •r, �, I=+ :4', t y;{, . t r 1 1 'T'�I., ,.cr.r..,. :+„a...��,7��NER3..,.. J ' 1 `M1I �'.r "' Y If ' � 7 ' + �1)I ,, S.Inr,...r..-.,.».,.,...J" -+""" b r.J,yr.,+....a„:....,w t •'r -I r 1 .....«, II , I r'.:.,.1.--" *d_- , ,..» 11..,,;. .. .,...r„ ., 1 ..�. 7.:7-1.—`4Z\/.1 1 ,� 1 , r,,. ! � ... .l..irr,'r•w'..�,•'�` T"'r Or'''�,.'+1 y' '' ",^...1d"•r•,yr..w r« .,w...,,-..,„. a«._ •• —\''.1..,.„ ` r.r„� •' 1\ • ad .�.M .. '" ,.,,:w•^^ M 1• '..' ,_.w�..w.7.v..,.,..._r..,.,...w.:_.f a,,.._, I ' ... • ' f `yi i C Js Q 2°�' I r'1 "� 5 ,,1 "�j tiu,j�ylt,,Yt,R .,!1"u:4G1 7,r"h"F,,,•:^n.a/tn rMm,,,� ,,;.I, r x '. '� J'I.Atry 1 461r"> 4f'"}r ' 1 :''1:,.1.ts,, ``. ■ f I �" P'�(1/i�,, rr. d:.1,r.1\J n 3{ nt{+ .y 1 / `\ dl „lM1�+i.,�, tS.+,>vo•nl �P.G� G':S 19 1t^5arr`ra ;:iNii,u�1rK'L�r¢( r wY7" 1 t ' ' \ i `/+x4e tti'f:',..„II,,!'..'.•, . ,..,,.:'.`',A1'''1'.;..' f '' .'{,'" :t.4h, i4 rf^;, li..,,t/!i,.,. ,„5,6+.2„,6,,,,,,1,�r t2ti' ' f r'�+h).ii-1,c)1,1';• Ky t 1 7f.RakC?'lo 1 1,Lrtfo rr \ C4,...„II'1 I F. r M '\ L74 ,=�,If'�'1.�I I IN"�Tf`t�L.9'1111' eh.. ._, •ti.+..V 4ti! � f':�1' a �/• \, V...4-E- L,p' so l,"0•01.1.. rass,uJ1u,k _ M.w_t/ i.2.tI ""°, 7 4 '�it . �Xd (ING RA,/ \ y \ I 37�zt. 0,119 14110..Ert1nN 1+�LA∎JD .- • !111 „Y...---J ti �'✓� f ,'+2�' r3r.C�1fl w1E pin�)..get.lra y'y e fJ. �• r�Gal',.• fw..r,,,'y.. +, ?...12;_`1..3, fr7_rNr I I ,h-Pr)'•J1l,LC- , .�»" -,..i' 3;1�-t?,ri, ,•)31ao I,Ir{71AIJ Ur-I•tJF,A-rnK'A ��r�17 i 1vl,c ,., • • • ' r '({ r T ,• ■ ■ 1 ' 1 4 J 1!. ... r. ,`,. ..1 ' 1'. r C' .... 0• f ` .t �',l,.,,f '\'.'}" r`1"C ;�r' „�I' .,,r"r, ,+., '-yy,. 'ft( Or {uy" °,�'.,.tr ea."ug'..••.�N4 m • ' 'i'/ •'1, , "l� . i ' , t r� l � i X01,! / ', rf1; I� .1 r1/•.`'t 0'�'�. ,� j� ,� !•�•.�'..r y'"P%+il . , C. a 11•y ' . 11 U';',,,,,NI ! f, •�'It,' .,pt ,,1',,,?; •SRO ' I'r \1:.t '. . VI ' (r.f t Atli � j I; A 1t l 0,1' ( e,, r 11 ' ',• ,".IIA.IrJ•M'+�,e'„tb�••+••A yI•'••w•w•`'• ••''r” 0" R. 'gl, l1 �:1...1♦,I ��.0(. ', �r tl I. A,.I it IN,,,»:� '1, I L ' l" t.t h l'e""qt# }01,t lr .4`•Wrr �" "L t�vi'� �7, 4170tH .4-. • r�ryw•.r_t't d' 'I Ijf '1 \• r' • !I �.J I' iRey .4,1 1,' .',:,'...4,,,,'11,14,t,41*1 1 , d I�.N 1''',; S\ t / ' .r I' �10 ' J,"Ii'y• i4 \' rt�� rCl�� f yl'1�.f°, II O' Yr;:1H �.rv1111.141 1,''�tr,r'•f�. \ ,� =r!'Jrl C6'�i t�'pwl . t „1: ■ 1 ) ),frl,, 1 1 At. y 1 1 :A i 1A1, �,k1 '` ' .� ' ' y.l '+', `!, 4(,...� r r' r � C,, I Itl t 1 pr+ 1 1, 1 r ",..„0.,,' .' 1' .. " ,4.•) , ■ 0 I r Ur I11 . ., r. 4 , "'1- _y,,'' "r �, v '0 t •, 4 I„ '1.'1'1'104� ? (" � 1" J",1 , 1' ■:1 1„.� '"►►,1 ';e'41�., •J, .-•,.. ,t '• Jr• •,r r. f ■ rn r r '1'.r" 7. .....,l ...—L,....,, ! •^ ? ( t ' •' I ., �t I•i�I•rr,f.•'Il'' I I1 a :' Ai..`. a...+d J.»..iL.r e+ _.:.:».:..� 1 I', 1.11! .,-- ". :.w�,x '.� _ _ , , 1 Ij 1! .'t '4's Jt r. 1 vl 1 I� /II, ' tl r ..�r.r„„,__,h rrr.'" a-r,,-----0-..-7:::.... i.:'l ,`� 'T"� • •1 j, .. 0 ,I •' ..,`,' i,elrr Y , 1',. 1 1�./r...t.4f,»\..''^ »...��»..._. �""/r;;f;...•,i�•.'i..1»�f�.'..: \ '.4�• t - . 1' ,r.1-r�"I Y' '. ,X11 4„�''I.W'......,. 4 I r r I'IllhI1I1jliu1 ,;. ��T'!! ,1 ;',t("r1' ,''� , ..4. --- ,P 41(.11'.1 • -„;. r,r fir. 1 ' r1 a II . . ' ,� 1 . ' •, ., ' \\....., .. ,1r',.., n 0 ...».∎•`I ,1, ' y' " »Y r ' .1(. l 4, 'PC. . '9 . Y'I, I '� r h e. i I,1 .,1,1,_:.r,t2 '')4 L'A,,i -- .„,„ , :i...,, ,11 1,, 1 ... .4 I, , ,.• i I, ! r. t , - •-\\ if - .r,4 ...„....r„...... 1 1:1 I 1 Y » i •. t r i ;y : 1 ' ' ' 'y rri I 1 . • I+ 'y ` r 1•Z,t �r . . f ! ♦Na'. .w••r�...-w•�+F..tea. ..ra,M x+♦ 1 J , I i w ' I, I ;1 • r,'1R,.. - 4. 1 ..>....rYvx^n.nwnruryn.w'.ve.,�+anP: y .- + e 1 , • ° f 1 Ir {{ , 1 0 ill 1 st1! �•r. •owr�.o.s ...,. .nW , IIi -: ii. .. x. L .. st�G Y A.P w: r_.a , ww r .te u!.Mr'F,r . . w.- ..-... AAA �•- 'r :... r'1 ws ,r_..., -" i --°-.r�-'� !W„„ „r..r++-rr^�'r_.":"'�++,.r,.. .wHnr9..,;wr.•.�...r.r�. :` .,"'',"*''',7•:""`," .� w ,.`„�'r vr+7s•,� r4, '� �,; I o 1, .°4:°1-,4::,,;°:,.•„.,,,,''.1',' fr S{dr 1, ,,�tJ t J 1 L .nh-ylfi I r r {� 1x I �••i4-,1.t -„:--....•.•,-,;:,yry -,....--`....•,,,..t..,....rr..+ - rY"r+.,+ ,;.- ."•+ .�1 .14 e, y y t It 'r. °,' Tf"� .,J.,d,r, ,c,L lYy .tn r ^wj is".� w„ ajad 'r. .Y'7.6f Cr �r ,, ° 'Y , 'I, •fP`,, ," ..r , ., •, r J{Yrw�l " tl.. .•, ..^, i .', . ,":� r 1 „ - •' ,," “t:0 - „, { 1,34%, ,I:44 a .3b1,,�T , If Yp t ', ,....' , "......_.��t � 1 sr 2 yr' xpaz rwlx,i�d`it' r�yt�� fG,,, .....,.. `1 .,+.:.�wr..,,...n«««.....«w......,,.r:. .y.l,.f u;. .,«,..r.m........+,+,.aw.rw......,r...+.,.+,.ti..ww I '1tr'PIGrgL 01/ R1—AY C1',055• 5 ECT'ION.1 ”' 1 I r✓ • • 2 MAX. '0,7:11,, +t rt�tt tm -----------...„,,,,,i\%.- '/ f C "■w�`�'" +;�;� �f, �'til. �,. .a�. Nom. S'S4, 1i.�a.�.;, i�1�',& \. r. _,'A rn,,.: I '`,:T�f't :S:r'.T ►' •-r ."p '5., I' Y I • '•'�,.-�1 is ..'r,,, ��{.�• ,1�i.�rr, ,61t: r:. ,.,q,., „✓ ////// /It EXr5TIN= A,C, uI+FAC1= r�,•4' ;' , S0 „--, •,,,.—. V• cLA55 "C" A,L', otl&(ZI.A'f, k ' i. C 24" /y''-o' :.nf rf'perr C. LiSt-1 S 17 kocK . 8'f 1 r/ "-pa If 1+ v 1 i , rr .,» ..-.-..-r.....v.; ,.,«. », �.~ .. �4-,, �.....,.. .»w .,,r.«...,v�,.�w...... «�.v..., -_..»..... e. .w ...ww..-,..y.,•„-, ..,...a» ..w. '” w... ,., .y, ,, a., .. ». 7 4 ) r,., . 4• • r 4. ' • • • 0 • 1 • . • • N 4, 1\\,k,* III . • I • • " i I i S P i iii i b. I D j.I • ' . • • • , .� _ it�E�`1 . e � , b o N ti4 a t1 x u . . & . 1 1 .+w n a_•. fly I w•f�..�,,,y,.,..LL,��yw �J\�'`' y. • s %) r ,: .'y. ar`rrt uw a-.a ♦ as....«.....—s i v..u.♦ rwiw -\e n+r'rvwu.� y _: �.• w w,w n,rM nr+.t �jw} `w`�y l.iW�.MwM/Ww�..na.n ? 4 , t'. is.. `. A S+ ^ y '4, `y,�1 ` ,, ?„,,..,,,,.>,,, .1 \ �`}[) f, y ...,,,e.,... 4,-,:.'.... p *---‘--4—.1."...., �`'• }� !y a "Y h� ae " Y'. f r ; '�1 �t .. 1• J r S�� (` i, ',-,,,_,,, ..;„,,..,n....' • • . f 1)')U� },J+'Y{/h.wo�,• ✓ ' .. M K w V Lh �+A . .1 w `n r •�\• Y M • r i N M M ih . M M Y 1 M 1 / ' , 'M ' ". ,.4.'''.4--8.•'f` 1 '. , S'w.:^.:`.o.u,.--- {4,-,.w.. ....., .n;,""""'"".....d,....+....nr.,........).r4..ww,"uir* y' 'rt"'"kre`kli',4lv.n,et1' 1+ew r n,,..,w..�,r•.,,} µ ' w .'' r(C) 1.1)?' ..,.a..a1 .+.:u.""""r-+,i,.""'"""±."'.—.,+»—» a•,a 41..+ Y' Ie r'..iwYl. � �1 t• r..+r,wwfnvwSMh'rrik�aniw.. �( r .......... ! 4v. •S" (r.;;`) ,/� ��^"' ..yy .w.i ..'�,r'..r «+u.... +.wr....i...w..ai w+.,w..++.+•.+w..a«,.... ,, , ` fit` ' .. ."•�;„E..Cu�,I � 1.„.4.. ....w«w.,.+.,.........w t..,, •..,.r...........—i.t ,, 1 • , ......... i-e)p� i 1Ca `��i l,p1 .e�.. ' /` r✓ r C yr' , . , ' 1 1 x1 d a A , 1•••. y 120,is,p,, l'0,..e...,' ''''' , b Q, W 0 c. . r.3-- is'''a ,Jh., wig' • • • 0 iv\ 14- Q G. i �; ,r G Q • ,�; 3. V..4 yr,, ; -1• o 4. \, o til 5f P G '77;.,"--„,.,. .(771? � .5 lC✓YY�.�.1� � ti..-,ewt. - = *{{_•�: '"cam �[r� '' � ♦ .... _ ; ' •• , ... ,�.�.y�.....++«.-. 4. axw,ey dwsaw ±, ,i% ,1M3,x"1,r f,''i1'� P ,1 h d '. I ; . 4.`,,I.1"' 'N.' N 1 a ..—‘4.—....— !.t^t^n,.hRK j!.y t:�''. 4.•.�` 1 r. y'U W,C Rk w�^F7Y.�Was\ ON 1C d 17 k s✓�J1.Y "�w .,oNwN+'Nw n ..w,u .,./'•i • . v i '1�.M15 A,A $X'.,'.$• fi;$4$111.,,,,,,,,i"li.' {M1 i ,: t � r:tY-1 1 ,...1—.3�wf UJ r' l..„ ., , ..,.. . • _ , n'1,r i p 1 ' . r,,*!.'.'33"'", 1 ' 2 r�7i,y t, J�,, 1 ' 1 � � 1 ` F,,r'y, � " . A3. y 1 c ""'c, N ,u cr r 1- 1 i a ., 'b }1tF P,, y,,,it,„,.,, ,i, ,?T'1,,e, . ,1., � 0N ,, , wt-� , r j ........r J.,.,,,,114.1 ,.wvNR + +..,««u•. r ,7< k ,,w� t' �i1 1P ' J d� 'iA l ., 1/�•'1,'1 ' +� q '1A'3-t'.'�,` tit 3 t`a it . .; `" rh t W. :t �n� t , r� w r : w ' lr 4I��q H�n, R 11i 'Ii7 ei'`•'1:::',,,":"":"•:'•';'''','-'''' � rN 4 � . ,,,,, . 3-4"�3.3;..,h.i - ,,,,3,, ,.' J 4 „; , tr: , 1,. i -,,. t.,,,103 :,. ,3,4 ni 4 .3. „....,. , . • A,. :a , • • fie , ; • ” , , b 5,• . . 1 . er , t 0 , ep tl . ti • ...»... _....,.•.... ..+ I,uy. ,..r.l r - .. .iJ,..,<...r...:lr i.. I'C y,. 1oa1';1 a in`'}..,i;. , ,' ,'q (; 't_uYF,,,-' \1 m •r {r......,,in,r,.,f r A T E�44,4",' Y , t�� IY Y „,A C dM ., • . \■''' ‘i ' : . ir ''' 'si;,;;;';':;.::','Zi,:; ''r' ' :'' ' ''' • i.i I.. 0.•` i 1 'NiI:tA t /RA,1 ARK r • • ' ., • LATEX HOUSE PAINT ' 1 1�, ,tit , 1 .,f,1,tr,, k,,r,r..; ./t, i y4' ,� it1 S. �1 f' f5 1 n 7,;;:::::.,,\\ \ u p 1 rr a (/(/( ' • .Ti .i.:,�' .,,, -- ,`.,,,,,‘1),:4,0 l t pt,,,„y,�t,rfv,tt° �, Y I ( i ( iv 1 Tomorrows Paint . . . •' , r� /]/ home today 'r �(T �tIC?R LATEX 'I rr r a i gyp, H, yr YI }�,+„-L,.,,„, .; 4 I ` \■ \� fir, /1O/r �v®LYIr IVoIJ!/G UoWay �'<I vn • !1 1;','*,:;:1'..;;:',','4.!�r1f'�ti}t .�l,�l 1`�'r��p}� ? \\\�.�.. '. / vr�v4,'ar}� _t ,r jx'S°,'1�i7�frlty,�lxfit�� ..� ' ,i 41l KbliZ 1 hL�[ ry,ia1 i iP''( A • ,.. Yy't�3s iJ ;r J•rX,'�` I',, .1•1 try 4•�,, >ti9 I ,.,u'a , Y 1 Y 11 t ,J s ,alit yy 1 fur s y, �rY1 ,1,,,,,. ,,_ 4`iIx,4}c,,v �rx■ ' ! , ''�•„y �, pj T j111•ril„ ,uiar,.',..,,,,I .r •{,. e ,5.* Y ,, i' ,,_� e • �x e- 'r�i� r} t fi?gyp i§tf��cr ptrv .�wR t u C -�~ y'u✓......r ,,��}}s AYy�'t"t !b 1;i I1,"}r <A r'i Y 11- '�tn s�',C” ,�� T� Hi hf7-.,e•p oot and I. rYl N �11i�tu ��i� h A u�P ,,�`,r•, ,f �Y iNrt'�•-Dilater Raslstant .--- a i cif rid �,,,, $,`..,1r.1",,001,,1. i �� '•�► ` '�� ``.+..,.. �...,.� }� ... / i 44'''' / '1+•1 1'1 i` r 1,5'V,. u4 r, �r{l, i ■1 � 1 ,r+it'• . _... ..�II t Gm 1 sltra ,ra r r 1 , 'f SF � 1 atfl''i'tr}�tt F;,1q�R �.,,� grG�4f x I (Qpj4�� ,'1, ,` �” `\\ \ k 1 AtJ.,,;;„,„"+�, 'jf i t!`..'' '4,,, 3, i 1'. , !1y � 7 }h'1,y,,,, `' \\\ '- ' ur i�, ,fV r 0,�I. �� 'Q 111! �,t} ' {t�-it*� R ,'1: \ 1 TWO it : ,,A 1 r 1 ri..'1 �, '' �:i! 11' �4' ,,ui, ;4 !'�1 pit f I ::;.1:i4:' �i}\ © � \` A•A��. 1 ( 1 \�i/A r1{r�`4 1t rr/f c�r�l 1pr! yi t�tl}r,r Y { l Y rtiia�`' 1{ err y: ' .4 A r ga a' �.N''� 7,,„,,,,,,,„A?�Paint right over N ,1:Kra, �,, •�•+ ' r,`,�,, "t i. Ri r damp surfaces 1 r ., 1 rir ��• ..\, ---' , < x,•tr,,,;� ;; ,,• ,N " x,11 _ 1/,� ,�,F,, l �t C 1,, i v , n 1m '.., - _ _y� �r' -"'. ^a ridk'iry A r,,.�r'^I,4 , r t'•r�"�"y 'ti wt Irlxi gyp;. Il } „t . . Y lair yl�rl ~� ` .,�r u'„1 1i OP b, 111 •�i, .✓' .` ''�� Wash Brushes Rollers Ir 7 } ' ,w+t• t 7,�1 .��..r- '” (c1 ' i I� i M p 9 b t+N 41b,' fi , a Hands in Water r� _ „{s'1� ,� .�a Longer life— �� '1 1 r 6 n �� , .1;,'.';0*1AA,f rrc 3 ”• F i y, Iooks'better T�r s ��”. .»r (v ' rr 11 � l by r l t w • FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS ON EVERY ABEL ~y >r ....-..- •- �, ;, . -,...v, 1' ''' .# " 0 f- ytt..",;.,', .-t,; tl i■∎ '.4.,h,i,11i}ttf rnn,Nn_u '"C' .r"' M .'r r� .,,...t vi, u '„��,rt. r t,r 4y. '�, {� !• _r '''';37:2'N[” ] r r <�' '♦.Mn4 1{il+lilM ! r11 1 gT-�Ir 1 t Yilt k d e I i P ':.a �� C 1: vtyv+ MILLER PAINT COMPANY t'r ;f` ,a.r �;: x ,'' ,, t „, ,•}' 05.4, j�,� •.k>'dnhn o, ,r, It Y r �' � 1 i PORTLAND r--' BEAVERTON r—SEATTLE �` '!kr �rre , � ti,; yyAA,� „ rnr � _ ^!4 fSp t yj.., AI!'r,; Vn,M.k/mr.At jr 1.,7,J .wr..Y ',,,,„""if,„ " f i i it ", 1'r� i`� tY r'"�Sun •b,, " r 1 t�i_ I ,i1.N r �!.`� „ � ibl t hr�t�� 4,1,:a� ' l�" ri �i ..v o 1 ,• p,• ;. { ,r 1 r 111. ,i f r r 1r a ,,I" '"? r v# ' 1� d 0 f f 1; }t , • .y w fy��Q1 t Jri tk , ( � ><i :. r' , �P! 1 ,, �r *,lf`v,t7P 4 �' .1,',0 2.,, 1f1 I k f,' :' �• ,ft0 ii.ER�4, 1 .r r r1'. i L r r ,qt if,,+ r f>;1,,;:1 h 11' P,b,!titill.0,41, T,,,,W 1s 1 s '', 1 '}v A Mfr r" a •,„,, r 1 w r1 ! 1 t C fT tl wMOnx,�r, 11 'At '4 r i. ` ,' s i Itl ti t t J,a ,t '1 Y1'3t+„{i iriJy".,r 1 VC yyY9�.1 r ',far e/g s.1.,:t�. ry l t ' ..'' ^.I'4 r"``”t t.��1:1A 3• • I • , $ , y 1 1 r 1, 1r 1 I i .. . °, . o,"W' ,. } I„ , dl _�6dLi,w. .,1tA isw,..W,w.... .4. .4,.�...... ....L�,a,M _ _ .... -�' ( .. ,...-.. ,-,�. v.. ,.w, ,>,..:..,.u......,,,..,.+a1„.,,.......:..:.a.+:,-:,.bk4a:. ..:........'r.,w..y.,...,,+„4µ-.:..;..,+.«...� ...,7U+.,.u...,r .-.w-,.a�n, � � �� r 8 j� at ' e Feather-like rushing • 0 Li2113 E �: t• ,, , ta• '; EXTERIOR LATEX ' 1 n Dries in Minutes . E°IR 1?,ii 5r' t '`° ► ,' to a�Velvety Finish,.1 „, 1 HOUSE PAINT irasy Clean-up •Mildew Resistant * WOOD SIDING * PLYWOOD *I,BRICKS * STUCCO * CONCRETE �r CINDER BLOCK "* ASBESTOS & ASPHALT'SHINGLE & SHAKES r.: • • �' " "t�' � Ell . ' . . ,, .. ei ,', , , • e 7004 *7040 *7046 *7044 *7042 7002 LIGHT CREAM BRIGHT RED FOREST GREEN TRUE YELLOW ROYAL BLUE BIRCH WHITE , A,,,, k Fr �,1 Y '� ','S , r: ":"-r----`,"::-";.pp"T ,r i.•t,,17,7F'1'l r 1,,t4,7- 4„,„,,,i,),,, f ,tr,C r i i t _r r. ,t.l (' , rr >, ti We {.,aC;,,i,, * ,o..,;,,. '';.{ ''y F,w.t la'7}t rl�r4 i-ur ,u l ;r � a ri 1 r A',-1 ,I� r 1s , 1 � r� , •h TV r �:S , �t+. i:iYt{!t, i I�ir�'',e r I,t v!{1�i.J`rt 1 1 1...'I l s ?j,✓<{Irr ;,,, � ( • ;,{•:,l,f„ ft",,, R 1., � , ,1 ,:,,, t ,!, ,-4 .,, ,1 4 1,, , ',, h .. , �1 Il�',,ll� r.hTr,�r yY..,IC1!, ,1 , . , w t , to'i 4 4"1,5 1 t '�r !^: 'I r 6a,..,Jt'�,_,ii., .�J, tC`s:' ,4 y !IN i ,Yf p,`I �V�,t I.� � a+•w i±l� t' ' •r -y•-::r, t:,;.Y.Y'x• i„;'G "',rry,Y,, d I �`, tii X$A Y,,,) ».{: + at ,7 , _,4 Yr , 'R� tr;( }5 17fr I .,..,.r., ity„,,r t �,r ,i lr ,):, , ,•,,i:t:1-,Flr' 1;?.ti!,'',, .,n A .r; :t ,.'.f Aith l.�,l,?',,`w,,.:'' >r;...tl"tf it 11. 1Yr 14 4'S. #.,c'; ,,,, I 1,•' 't 1 L,! t., d.. t i :,,•1 d t ": ,t, t -,V;Ir.`""'',A1,. -r t r t r tY ,,:',,A,,,'„,,1. ;1 1 t ,Yi: ,� (pee? .'1't ,,,: •`1r r a tr' r'' 'i�`iY�t`,A a.+.-.;` t _ e J� !M',,1, I rc r:' k, ""t.�' ■ ,�'�'F i•„a1,�,11,a+i �,(y^'• t •r`�: tt >.it �r,:; t� �I YN t .rt;`,•I.„r.r^v �:,-� ,;I„ ' r- r '�st y.t.,.ir tA'! • _ J. ,i' ,�l'o.,1.∎,,,,‘",4„A4, 1''''.''',I w,t,,�t .0.4,: 1^,1�,- 't 14 t r ;A F.x+ '"!„7 J:j:?.. . fi. 1 1k �r,ttr.,o-�f �s .,,y�«d%1 (4\A&Ae, ,-,bect,\A�.i r.,A>7t ,�y . d t _t;,1 :15 µ;41i 'I° >, i ! t,{.`,„,!:,:',,;:,',,,,t,),, r,' N','1,,,',„+,;11,..,,;,`..1.,:14,'-,., 'S y • ;1 -.( h ' f �, it h 1 'j y,A" l,,� x r't'r 1��'. C' ,,,A.Y I ,t IA::I „1v,'�7y a` it, 1,„1,.in ,., ,J +7 ,k,r,.,I,. ir4,'It :r' "4t k..4 r'Al, "t F L w."J -,), � I.,,,', ' r,r",.. '1 I i'A A. > 1 r,■AE , 1 ', - r 7r nA ,,,'; �♦, � y ti , es a', p I," ,, :,',a,:„a,, ,w a:f.. >I, ,{ t,� t 1 ,s+■ ,. 4,, t'1,..: V 'l ,51 it (i t,� A'A.J,,,Z yfr51 - �•'""``'1^1 ' ',y � r,� ;.h , t b' W 1 ,,,`,)1. 1 Yk. t v i 1 h t �(,� „"+ d � r i,'.ill ! '-A„ , r ' I '11k G :f r 1, 4 nr,,,,;`,A , b,, ,t{ t s "' I u' }r,f rl r .1 {I'...:ta i, 1'° ,.. C }i}rwl;To.',,!« h r 1 t,h 3 W �:?At 1r ,,r .tia r 1 °,1F 1 f f T t «.,, ,,,, 4 i,;llt 1,C r ; '..^."',1)'t:1;,.",:f%S., ..r.'':.I, s' ,n<.r■ N "4,,,,,',11 , )',r, y ti,,i FA �tr ,.1. vt r•. ,"-A;°V,..,4 t_..,,..•+•°•'^"'°. �,rrt,n �f a,�,. i v,, i "k la ay f•r; , ay.Y ,.i ! ` H""^ti, • ., 1 1,..ir?".., ,t �J r wyj.i#i, t�,',ih Ali l.'.,y 1xlr.�tyr`�"ti{u�I,Y V,9'r'',,,,1.0P• {i.-AA_ q 4,, } �1=v t A'':' t! 1 a � w?'� r ' �- ' ' t t7' t t,:��wl ...,:A..Y ,..Su.wok hr.a.'.�...�:.....,...,,..,'.�..,w�.w i h.., �.. ,, rrr,e.,,6 7013 7014 7009 7006 AVOCAL, PINE GREEN COLONIAL BLUE SUN YELLOW y y r «. ,.n•,-- ,, `,r t. ';" 7,., 4••,, 11,4,,.. v , ,.i✓., '1 •,!. ?,A't,.A,..., Ii .:`:% 111 r1 h ,-' 1 !r, . , l- wi ...M '' ,. V , . r it,,;-,:p. y'a.• t '•: I•a'.,...c 0, m^ir•l ky.,, .�.1 ::cr L-i2 i � "- ! ,fi ,.?.,{,,'1' i•ir h ,t r :Ir«,w.+^.r^ w•ryr.-+ •1,r•-,-y « '{{ "•,�r Sp!s:u•r; ;1' s �,",kv v, ryt 'r4, fYl ',1•i•: -'•', 411uu y s 1, . ,+•', t,t,y 1 '4 , 27,.:• "f.,,•S 'i.;'S° ! "q 'Y xr t 1. '1 At,d +1A:,A.,, .. ,A,� y a ;� t' •,.'r° �C:.d 4f ':rn`' ' r,lr ., }tn ,'� '�'r iG 1�.,>S rµ f cQ,,ii t,.''. 0,0,, 1 r,p.Y ,A.f r∎,`,.- r?v.' t; I fr�M .'!:�` I 1• ' ") ., ')N {5 .r . }' ;,d' 1+,V.r^ Xl rr rc•9 1'rv, :� "4', �i,'lt �K I{ t",,tt , :.`� tCs.. , to r� .f v t{ i 44'11' 'r' :t `;.1 41.4E+ 6' !P, V,i .`rt, t,A -v a" i"r,t', ,1.�',,,4 , 1 t'�„ f,:1 f'4 r1 1, t VI.'!,", t r' 4441 „c,,,....• r- ,,, -'I ,:I ,, ,r„' , , Z i/ ,'Fr t- }•,! ,1 � 1 , r,: ,1 r• d 1, } 1 '1 ':v �i, 1 �A' ki{ i 7� �;) t ( 4 �F Ali f �I Y *.•;,,',',,,4 'M ( Y�r ! I,^ l`;' 16 p I,., ,(t•l, A,1,t r h.4 r ',v 1 '11,',.„:,,,,,''.:1.•, ° w r'' r-• i t, S p -I F,.•t IV' ,,,x', �,.,t, a ,, 64,.,0,1 wr'� 1{' ..1,,,+'7,5 :y h�,' l++r - i:: ,, I., •4 .4, , I, rn ,t II r, , ,,,,rY•at,• ^,; ,; 4, , r,'I. .„.•y_,, ,.,•. .1',;,F; a At' ki r�7 z t'I , '•{ wt rr"` ;:(}. _ -I t , � f,�,'.: kikA.,l y.^140'3,•i P.{. "rrj". P4�,°;"":I.j1;'� ,!,7 M,`1` ,.'.t,H,i'-• r; r,rl.t fr. ✓r rt., }'r �i' .r Wf+• l 'E`, k ,-.r ., t,,.,sl ,_ % rl •r"', t;', Al tt.. r !.t t..f.! r<i 11�, dFi I,: Ml {..,-t 1 .•,rr i d, %1F �i t `ltM�`I, ,%, f r- (• F r a,, , lt�;>nt1 w'.' ,'+,, •' ' ..?,; 4,, r.{:.1.1{ Iki,v w Q":! ,,i //, ,, { ,4'i' t r1 , ,,-„��:r r{ :'.,f 1 t. 'I,sy .r aK. Aar h, 1<�' ';:YS iy 'i ,.,•,"r t' r rir 11.�1 .' I 5, 1, P r - " r , ,hi:/bK ,u Q t```,,, • ,, ,i,:,,,4',,,,,+ sir t. x, y1•r ! r',l A Aj r.,-...'� i,H, ,, � r' n ty , ° riy P �'n, Is ;T�1�rr}+,',r kr ,h yl.X,. Ir ,1i'w°,: t,,t ' " I„ , 491 NlA tl,:, 1 4,tl , .tt A ,t l;j i.{r , .� .+,..t} y;, 0.:y! 'ti 1 y�Ae ,1r pY' ' ,i •t r -' Y '. 4 � .p,1 , r', q1,. ,7 i, ft,j, h-bJ.'. ;�, .�' rA , h t.,',r� 'i,r 1' 1 r I.,, .6r,, r'•.r., a ''G ,7. e,r' M1i'�}i1,1�.A l�Q. ( !' ,r ,ro Llit• Ary, , ;1 ,.1,,_ sl, r "I 4.1, I, 1'p-I I' I.•> I, , 9+- M" •t'rytt , F,9 > r P ' , - ..r.t, ..,, ..,,.,, r .I,z;'r, r.!1..I) I r' i, jA ..y tr .... p *sa...».,...400,... .,:rl.,.,.u. ,,,,4,2, .„„.i,,,...„,,,, z zrrl l,l.r I.I .i,•Ie!.,r,' r 4 r'1 U w a .u.i,u, u'« a w i.w«�'• 4, w 7028 7032 7010 7030 SPUN GOLD AZTEC GOLD 1 PEARL GRAY y SANDLEWOOD • ,1++ ,ir+, 1 r ,I,✓•N Aft't r,,,•'..,,,,",n;,',,,,1, v A ,7 3r,t .,,,'', -, rr r ,fS,'bf� , , ,1 ' {r+ ,1 14,, '4,4,1;;;4^, 'P iitC{ try , ,4, , I'.,l 1,'1 -.4.06),. 1''•,ttii ti,,,." y . r 7 i ,, 1 i- +1 4t 'P ,1 '1 Pf 1, r at fit{ �Ait 11 y,il S Sri' 'Pr t44 t1f, l „ ',t e )t,''41'! tlYt' hYt 6 Yrk lhtk 1.Y^rI CI '•{ _ i2 ry+,t M9 L',, 1Yr,x •f l '^.1 i°7 v A t Z 1'''' e' k 17, 1 �I,t y, q3,?+:a, y,4 it v ,r�i { i , - ' d 1 ,,, , t.F l F dl r,,�klk'J•,,1 f a _4r },, , 1Sr,x71 i u ' ',,,i,:,4',':,,,.!,'?h �y� i" lr) "�, 11,,t rr rk t,,,trf P ,. ,'' ,i i,A I •, D i.1Y i'A✓•>t{'t"4„,',"'i1r1�,•,t,','i i17r y�+ ,r',i-'�''7A. w di d« ' �I, '° rr^, iC.:^fit ,1 A 4' i°i.,Y,..I,.t. I .,..,.; i r1 l` ..,. 7023 7034 7018 7020 BAYBERRY SAGE GREEN SUBURBAN,RED OAKWOOD BROWN . ALSO MADE IN 7000 WHITE-7050 Oik COAT WHITE--7052 EXTERIOR PRIMER-7054 SEMI.GLOSSTRIM WHITE-7`024 BLACk , , r (i • 11 i • • Ill �. i I • it