Loading...
SDR56-79 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. r �` 1 "/,,,,,',t 1K f:r.:,;'1',l t ylr^w ll�':" t hIr.{V;«7✓ hr.«I In A, r 1. ,LL /1 i t.,,-r y ,tN,r t. A , -1 , r .4 4,n . .,.w aJ I , rr.a,. , , , GI EN 7 Y,,T0WN,CENTER,ii RANI II SDR 56 7g 1 . 1 y, B ' t ';` d,•• r SW �2 sSJi �sFerry R ' 0000` . ' 1 11 344, ot 50 . �r IZ©i e i4 ?pr;,�I i1 ' r r I r• ,:n1 r,17 r.��a:,w' °,•„�.k , • } • I 1 I • I ■ • • ■ Cal l v • • , « , '� • . ■ : , . i i fa.. ... ....lnt.n. ..h. »sJr .Iw ...a... _..I/• v«1. ..a. -.i.aML.,... .L„t..d.;'xYt 1.....t-.0 _ .>, ... wa: ..,1...41 w...4W..� r nn t • • • •.f''.i , y ARCHITECTS &�1 ®/-1 N�.7 N E MEMBER AMERICAN INSTITUT.. :r ARCHITECTS • ..�v . 1. 303 North Pacific Building 'I‘,1 917 S•W. Oak Street \*1.J'+ Portland,Oregon 97205 (503) 241-0541 . I I •. Mr. Atm B. Babar City of Tigard Design Review 12420 S. W. Main St. Tigard, Oregon 97223 1 „ Refer. ; Site Design Review ( SDR 56-79 ) +'r Dear Azcdm, ' I have reviewed the enclosed design review staff report with the owner's representative, Mr. Robert Hyre. He indicated that fnited States National Bark will comply with all of the provisions of the staff report. The Bank normally takes care of the required directional arrows during the construction phase. • Thu S, we have not shown th i s information on out drawings. • Sincerely, u ,f",J'ames Hagerman,��''':1A rr ` a I P I � I'I i I F l t . �• f' I ' , • STAFF REPORT/TIGARD PLANNING DEPARTMENT SITE DESIGN REVIEW • October 26, 1979 ' • City Hall, 12420 SW Main Street • DOCKET: Site Design Review (SDR 56-79) U.S. Bank - Greenway Town Center APPLICANT: United States National Bank 555 SW Oak Street Portland, Oregon 97208 LOCATION: Greenway Town Center/Scholls Ferry Road (Wash. Co. Tx Map 151 34B, Tax Lot 501) . REQUEST: Site Plan and Design Review for the United States Bank Branca at Greenway Town Center. SITE DESIGNATION: C-4, Planned Development • PARKING REQUIREMENTS: One parking space for each 350 square foot of gross floor area: Number Required = 10 Number Proposed _ 7 SITE PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW: , ,. The subject site is designated Commercial Professional on the NPO designated "Commercial � #7 Plan and is currently zoned C-4 Planned Development. The applicant is proposing to construct a Branch Office of the U.S Nation al Bank in the previously approved GYaeencvay Town Center. parking plan does not conform to the minimum stall requirement, Although the parking - g t, . . more than sufficient t p a:rkiz g space has been :rDVii ced as p art of the overall planned development STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary` Site and Design Review subject to the following condition • 1. The access point along the southern perimeter shall be properly marked to indicate one-way and/or single-directional flow: 2 The applicant shall connect to the existing sanitary sewerage Service and storm drainage facility part y as p of the overall planned development._ L- a I c , .. , • ,r 4 STAFF .:,PORT SI'I:G pESIGNor ;W V.'..ri w gage 3. No occupancy pe;zzt�.its shall be issued until all conditions placed tzport , , this Levelopment by the City of Tigard have been satisfied and inspections vcax'.it'ya,rtg this have been carried out by the appropriate department. • • ,, 4. No changes will be made to approved plans or specifications unless formal ti .:2r,plc�ati.on is made to the appropriate city department and changes are approved > '�- M5 that department. Application for. changes will be made in writing and shall .;n5.�iia.de app:.3,,U.cs.hle d awings r , ri. „ .►� J?i�ta.1ir,� �ate� sexvzr�e shah. be installed to this site prior x.t.. ...�_or t:a the , p 1,1;'El,...7,.,r, ,.,J' A2,a Bab t Ao r'cv'ed by _ . , C►arn�'L 1 `t "s3 pllar'irier P1 f' {�lJ�� s • Di�'ectar 11,J'J t Yrr J4 LC,�,5 art t:N I .i.1.,�.,,,�. 1f1a.s ,acknowledgement must be signed and returned, to the City of Tigard, ( , _ � ,_, r.l.c.txri.aing t epaa:-tmc n•r., within four:.een (14) days of of r • Y your rECeip.•� o�. `this letter. Failure to x�Ettz-n this ac�.n o��Ie a omten t will result in no furt,h'��r• ' action on f;1'i„1� 1,) CJ?C� with regards t o 1sstla�ce oL building perrru,ts b , p3,4-,,1c.ti t:,:i nr � y • -..+1,...w II, . ap..ps:O ai ✓�.Jt� . . � , ✓ � V�,4".f �A �4.. 11 Mr,w, r Y M J Y,,R 4 r � -_,.N 4.Y., / , r ..it..-7t i)r,«I 1,:t4h.:a Cure r r '''''.... "-----'' --- .+«..,...--- . • .• ,f r -'i --7--i ,r....,,f') . /7,--7.7.),,,,), ,,„.�,t • � ee, rl. can't:.t w I , • I � I I , hs • a °• a' k, Y ..H= =,}.wRA.~...: JWn ~r. ,r, v..•t. +T -+aw,tr ."✓i.��-3.,"J._,..x .rMY—•rnMfM.l+n.h•....,wrr � DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION 4yy ;t CITY OF T GARD PLANNING DEPARTMENT File 0 J __ -____._ . 17420 S.W. Main Street era, Oregon.- 97223 Fee Rec' / .�D,r o_ b.39-4173. Receipt. #r /4 .,s7 �. Date Rec'd 16 �"c''.�.77 • By ' .0a..... The "contact person" named in this application will receive all major correspondence from the Tigard Planning Department and that person is responsible for providing same ' to owner, architects, engineers, consultant;, etc. In this case the "contact person" is ADDRESS rs- .. . [. 5 ._.-..-.� TELEPHONE 4 All communications from this department shall include the appropriate file .number. '- The file number in this case is ,,.:� _ .- `) ._,_,.....,I have read this section end I agree,as the "contact person", to provide all inior•-- .:. ' nation to other persons with an interest in this project. ry /i ! _r.,_, ® . d ‘ , .... . �, S.i l xtuxe ' d q111/1767 PLEASE PRINT Oh°TYPE IN T'NI ' PROJECT TITLE: ,,64W1. ?1'' ..,., ` , 4.34/9/., 44,4 ,e tvg.. PRth ECT ADDRESS: /.v: .J -/ 07-4+. jG2 _._____..i ,, yiv, 't ',I; ' L t TAX LOT s CIRCLE AS APPLICABLE: / 1 �../4' .�. r; nC�1NEFt pEVEI,OP.ER,�5 NAME; 1 } ADDRESS: '� ••� f� ,25 (STREET) (CITY) (STATE) (ZIP) . PRONE (BUS.): . _.. �...._:a. SIGNATURE; , REPRESENTATIVE'S NAME: ,. 2n;ejer :.. .....a� Ma ADDRESS t , ___•_ . fb �'� 'q -.�.,,._,.��X Z.2 (STREET) .�� .{CI'I�t) i S � Zx E ( US)! g , PROPOSED USE . ,i DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY PRDTOSED USE . 4'$UILDIt4GS #C3_IT5 s�~.F1i. . � la"1 4041 '-,., `fir`-- y jL.0 .rrxl"E SXZSi ►�/��11 __A ,Z- „ TOTAL SQ-1"T. Ok"'-BUILDINGS: '�'� ,�� �y .1�T•�1 fly OF LANDSCAPING:7� �1 � �,� . VT, OF PAVING. #_1 "r SQ♦:..V.4. OC LAND7C�a'PING: 5 ' ) rw a...+. . u ., ANTICIPATED D VSLOPf4E NT pi;ikSSS•i / _ �j''i r�th M'}'y� i.r—.. V CS.�V�'1 S I O N: w..... .,, 1I ^ - .� Al .. ,. .-...w.. . r n aCOOK•'& HA.GERMANf ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS MEMBER AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS RECEIVED S EP 2 61979 . ,. CITY OF TIGARG September 26, 1979 303 North Pacific Building 917 S.W. Oak Street 1 Portland, Oregon 97205 1 ..K (503) 241-0541 Mr. Azaxn B. Babas City of Tigard � 12420 S.W. Ma in Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Mr. Babar I enjoyed meeting you last Wednesday and discussing the preliminary design review requirements, as they effect the U.S Branch Bank at ', Greenway Town Center. j The major points discussed are listed below: 1. Compact parking stalls signs 2. Landscape requirements 3, Painted exterior building gns 4. Building orientation and location S. Traffic circulation Item #1; You indicated that Tigard has no specific provisions for compact parking stalls. After our conversation, I spoke with the planning director, Aldie Howard He indicated that he would allow this type of parking space if it is clearly labeled. We are proposing two stalls, 9'.-0" wide 15'-6" deep. The remainder would be 91-6" wide by 19'-8" deep."#t k wh✓.^rwglna�a.N. F �,!� , 1. Item #2; We are now having a landscape architect prepare a plan for your review using the materials common to the existing landscape plan. K h Item #3; Where building signage is directly painted on the building, you* indicated that the actual area of the letters would be counted toward y our allowable sign of 10% of total frontage wall' As I pointed out, due . site line, we are considering our west I to grade limitations and obscured s�:i�e , Zne elevation (which is at 90 degrees from Scholl's retry Road) as our a frontage wail. ' .I � re preliminary location and orientation. We u. ude rstand that f nalmateal approval will not be granted until the general plan review phase. Item #5 We review site circulation which conforms to the pattern and dimensions, which was approved for the center. I will be in touch next week and resubmit the sign graphics and site plan for your approval„ Sincerel r, y qt ,,,,r James ' agerma ..x .... ,.... � ., ,..�.." ..., ... .. ....•. ...., ,,... ...i.,... .. ..... .. .u.n,..,..... .., .... r............. .... 'k C,...__' e wM , /; � 1