SDR7-78 POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
t w4'''‘'''''''' 4^• ..k {v ,n .:v,.m ,, „
• w r- y M �
n . , 400 ', B LL�D APARTMENTS , , '
�. .
site Dev'e .opment Review` (SSDR !7;"78.)'''',','; ,
" Phase II1
Z ,
, •... .. ,. M �MA:�Si�tl111!♦�E'7{L�`�.fi l.at.. �.,. +.
. •- ..,...�,., a �.ta�k� i�4n +JId�4xi�WnlmO}��iRMl W�I'6WE4xbl+•M�1 �...4 ..� .ue,.. .... .. ,I
�NdhE � ... 4M...,�_.»a«..�. .14��.�. � ..itr4Y"
, I 9
o
,
.
r x
ry
• 1
,
t'
I
a
9 i
.a I L I .
O
., o '
f'
k I
1
d 4�,
r
• r
l6�
•
•
• April • s, 1078,
Raymond J. Bartel`
10002 B.L. 21st Roor,
Oregon, ' 2 °
I ,
Its: Bellwood RovieW
nr.M
Please be advised tb t the Tigard 14 U ,1U,c, Commission at
their rc; ui ar t, of ,)ri t 1'1(78 �r i wed 'our
den = 1 ProPos • r Tor Phase ZXX o± Dellwood nesidential
.� .
Planued Development at 129th and Walnut street'. and subject
'.
,
that review to,t he Tellowin condition:
s
The 1ppiie LD prepare , justification for a
oPeeili d :n it i based Urn a more thorough ,
L4 i eyiov) o xis iA atuza1 features
d
adopted city Policie3 and itbb attention to
the issue of compatibility' between single
family a ulti-far± e3 res5deAtial uses
This proposal to he reviewed by th41,4 P1anr ;
•
•
Avsooiate Planner
SLidb
N ." : Thco following q } F w d, en tit he received d, the
City of Ti rya d within fourteen (14) days of your
recePt of this letter. S ai1u ". to return this
a kn w1edg ont may result in action by t 1 tho City of
l�/ R' e a pp ar b o uo for your Tiles and r o 4 r r the. r g M h .
het ,oknow .o o this ltter documenting the aotlo of
. the A.,q , r d Planning ( r koisg", io :w I have re+ e , eed and r a4 d
q
t��i m a letter.
1y� �+yJ".':+.e..wantiew.twM•ww»M++h«wwa>.»rt,+�a..�Mgµuµ;••.ya+f„+•�.' .�wrlw+' �1F �Wlaw• +k»nn�..w 'µaKe+wiM+.wnti�*+ '�
.+TwA.6 t.1 a!
\1
1 ...
{
r
•
•
MINUTES
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
April 18, 1978 .
Page 11
•
' J
c. That a half treet improvement be made, to
collector st eet standards (60 f.-et of right of
way and 44 fe-t of pavement) , o Beef Bend Road;
and that a st eet improvement , to State. Highway . , '
Department stagy dards; be made to the Frontage - TM
Road
''Popp entered le ;'ter from �a y.r-Kin g City not'
•
opposed to proje t, only co cerned over sewer I '
and drainage
•
Rebuttal : `
•
Bob'' Dietrick Arc itect., addressed concerns raised •
in opposition conc•�rnin: storm drainage can and
Swill be controlled 'not o exceed natural rate, ndt
high traffic generator sewer problem has been.
as to the ultimate an• is now a issue len political iss
'' to �o ution , and building designed
g
addressed at
to take advantage of', errain
Rossman moved for ap'iroval with staff recommendation n
#3 ti F
Motion failed for a 1 ,ck of second.
Wood concerned ove t .ffic problems also height a" •
.
limitation withou kno ledge of visual effects.
Favored tabling
Tepedino
on evidence stated o at Co' mission must,make decision:
dence presented a., d should not defer decision
., .
because of lack 's f adeq r ate submission sewer,
ewer,
drainage, traff 'c, safei:y, height of structure all a.
not adequately :ddresse .
Te edino moved for denia; , motion seconded by Quimby.
Wood concerne over deni. l because most of the,
testimony was not in opposition only addressed,
concerns for .'items that could be conditions o •
approval, 1 •
Popp favors tabling to al�I ow addressing 211. issues.
motion defeated 4-3 (No)1 (Yes)
Popp Tepedino,
Word, Quimby
Bria; Sakata
Ross an
11 i an Cml e v d to table�•' ble pencllig the 1"esglutton of
a a
MINUTES . ,
' TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
April 18, 193'
Page 12 °"
b sa nitar y sewer and the• submissi�� y the ,
applicant of a storm water det °ration plan . .
4 .
• Popp seconded.
Word requested that the motion be amended to
inc. ude an assessment of raffic, impacts and-
'
'a thawing be submitted rP f letting the visual,
effe., ts of the height o, the buildings to,
adj•ac-nt Properties. f
Motion was approved 4/3 (No) (Yes)
Tepedino Wood
Quimby Popp
Sakata Brian
Rossman
•
6, Other Business:
Similar use interpretat 'hn' on item 5. 5. Staff
requested of the Comm`;s ;ion to determine if a retail
sales and rental stor :.eing proposed at the ,intersection
of Canterbury Square 5,.d Gaarde Street was a similar '
use as a hardware or e'lartment which are permitted
uses in a C4 Zone.
1 . Herb Jandt explaine pro•esed project, that it would be , '
considerably small than ty'pical rental operation 3,000-
4,000 square feet s oPpo, ;''d to 20,000 square feet
combined' retail/r -ntal . 0 area devoted strictly to
ski rental and s es, plus omplete hardware/department
store.
Quimby stated sae was not sur, if it was similar in use
Sakata stated 't should be a c nditional use because
• she was not s.a re.
Brian, Wood znd Popp felt the usk, was similar to
hardware or department store. ,
Brian move and Wood second
the 'ootion that the
�, •: i,similar permitted....proposed se be a.n'te:�'pretect as been„ a sx.mz
use in ti C4 Zone.
The vot was unanimously approved:
6 , 1 ]8ELLWOOD REVIEW
A, Staff Report Laws Memo from Edwards CDP
CI, " I :4 a. i a R v' a 9I i I ub,." I G.."• r
w 41. -4 'it
� X67
MINUTES
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
April 18, 1978
' Page 13
B. Applicant's Presentation:
Bill McMonagle, 8905 S.W. Commercial Street, problem
because development approval is so old. Referred to
Item 9 of minutes from August 20, 1968 Planning .
Commission. They feel the proposal is justified and '
only with a ,clarification on density -• all other- items
can be handled in Design Review.
• I ',a
Ray Bartel, 10952 S W 21st Milwauki:r , Architect ,
presented plan showing;, how staff concerns will. be
I
r addressed. Plan based. on '12 units acre as stated by '
staff. Density proposed is not out of line with intent
of approved Planned Development that the density
review did not necessarily mean a reduced density.
The proposal is compatible with surrounding resident'..
C. Staff Recommendation:
•
• The applicant prepare a justification for a specific
1
densit y based upon a more thorough consideration of
existing natural features, adopted city policies
and
with attention to the issue of compatibility between
single family and multi-family residential uses.
This proposal to be reviewed by the Planning Commissions
Rebuttal : •
•
McMonagle questioned carrying capacity of land present
A2 density allowing 12/acre this is less than allowed
in ' 1968. He felt apartments should be
' p _artments intermingled
• not segregated - does not see any reasons for judging
, incompatible, •
D commission Action :
Popp asked what proposed density is 11 .4/ac.
II Tepedino saw main issue related to toning/planning
not being static. New plans/policies have been I
developed. The question is who assumes the burden
of the change in policies. `'t
Brian saw considerable j
`d.e difference in applicant 's
proposal (1968) with a 2-3 ,projected time schedule
as o ► posed to 10 , years+ that the developer assumes
�� y lop
the risk that things Will change over time
Sal.ata saw need to apply new regulations,
Quimby felt City should not be held to an agreement
or decision Made 10 years ago.
•
•
•
•
,,.
„ , ,....,.4,/ wMv^•'..,...+.rs�+crm,ux natP•C I r it �
rl
d
•
•
,
r
' . ( . . 1.' '
' MINUTES
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION ,
April 18, 1978 I,,
;a, Page 14 '
Wood stated prior Commission action does not specify ri.1
overall density, calls for third `phase density review. -
Applicant assumes risk
over 10 years that. things will ill 11
change. Must consider in light of exist in g plan s.
Popp stated he was not opposed to review. Would like i -, �j
It
• to see greenway continued. Applicant should work to * �; ,
todays allowable densities. ,.
f i 1
'' , Brian moved for approval of staff recomme:adatVion. and '
motion was seconded .by Tepedino
' Passed unanimously . FI ''
6. 2 ASSEMBLY OF GOD free standing sign on S .W. Garde 1,
Street
I Staff informed the Co mnd:ssion that the Assembly of i
God Church on S .W. Gaarde is proposing .to erect an
internally illuminated free standing sign, The
. Commission directed staff to inform the applicant that
he must make application for a conditional, use permit.
Meeting was adjourned at 1 :00 A.M.
• I
{
1r
. .k
, (• - c , . . \'' ' '......-4---,..,
i
' I
•
• I
rl
1
u r
•
µ
aP
V
�
SITE DES hOPP��T PZ4N it ;
X Site Plan Rev,3,ew ,
4 File No. r
Architectural Review .
--- Fee Received
,' , , APPLICATION Receipt # �Q (2 .
,, ,. r, '.Date cei�ed i�; ' ��
Tigard Planning Department t ,---, ..r ,�.�. .�. ,
12420 S it Main S1�reet9 Tigard, Or 97223 .. .
1 639-4171
>.
Project Title Bellvi2od
1 artmeat s Date Filed Feb.
Project Address —S W. 128t
l " a 28 1 Li-AA Par.t of tax lot 100 M.
Tax . ' No a Lot 1Vo b
E Developer's Name J. W. Brayso l
4, Address 11059 S. B. D._vis ion Portland, Oregon 97216
Telephone 25-::.-13.87
11059 S. B. Division
Owner's Name J. `W. B,; a son Address =orttland. Oregon 97216
Telephone 253.118' .
'
Owner 1 s S gn.ature .4.. ,, t
Description off' Pry►.osed Use Develop uni apartment project
Ywil M
DESCRIPTION TION OF PROPERTY
'C> I!d USA 2. BU?ldx.n +�.e,a� UT21.ts e. „�,Ft� 4-0 LI-82 .:
r y
�, . • Site Size ± To s 1 �.
V a t,lq. �t e of Bliiiai 40 482 s •
ft U
Sq. Vt. of Paving C.) OO,_ so , ..ft Sq. Ft. of endsca in
Atl:*lcipated Development Date m.mer 78 °
Anticipated Development P .a ses has
'aluation, ` E2'1. OOO:O0 ,
- . MlMMrrgFYppreNMIMYYW,MIt ♦ N
Agent: Raymond J. Day t( l i Architect 65
9-3988
10952 S. B. 21st Vli1.w ankie'l Oregon 97222
� •!.r.
SeptemX- 6, 1968
To: Tigard City Council
b ,-r•y From: Tigard Planning and Zoning Commission
Subject: A request' for a change from S-R (Washington County .,
• Suburban Residential) to R-7 (Planned Residential)
on a 50 acre property in the vicinity of SW Walnut
and 130th ;L•c Bra .son and Griffin, applicant owners.
_ j Y � £ � aPp
. I
' to Planning and Zoning Commission Action:
The Commission unanimously approved the zone change with the
conditional use for
Planned Residential D . e lopm ent with
the followin g conditc s:
1. that the preliminary plat dated August, ,19680 be
accepted with the exception that the lots shown
ens 28`through 34 be developed as garden apartments
instead of the area labeled lot 21. -
"n 2. that the public access to the park be guaranteed to
the City on the existing road masterly along the
• '•R, subdivision to S.W. Walnut Street until such time
4'
that this road is improved. At this time public
access shall be made by the developer, Meeting the
approval of the City Staff. u
4 '
3. that the park laid be donated to the City as shown .
on the preliminary Plate but also including lot 21,
4. that the by he park land be cleared of brush D the de-
ar velopers and the area in the vicinity of lot 21, be "
leveled during development of the surrounding lots 4
and graded as shown in the attached City plan for
improvement by the developer dated August 15 1968.
S. that improvements he made to the park as shown in -
the City's plans dated August 15, 19G8„ Playground .'tl"
I equipment meeting city approval to be install-ed by �.
the develo P r and his cost not to exceed $1,.500
•
cJ hat the public' walkways be lighted 6. that p �ic y with low wattage a
' lamps and paved 6 feet in width with concrete and
planted 2 feet on each side with low-growing shrub- '°
bery--Plans for both to be approved by the City Staff.
7• that the major arterials in the development (128th
be planted with trees (one per lot, 11"
and 127th) 4� Norway Maple or equivalent) along
caliper, C1:i,°.ve].and'
the entire lengt • within the development.
r 8, that the street right-of-way be improved to City a
standards as designated in the sub-division ardinande
including asphalt, curbs, sidewallksa' street lights,
r • and underground ut li.t.es, With. exception that the
" Cul-de-sac street width may be 28 feet.
9 that Phase III of the development will be opetr for
review as to dens Ltry prio:C" to improvement of the ,area.
• i �,� 4 x+..1 5 t t l t1
'� fm.ily 7ied
I
Planner:: ..
i I i I
li
w ,
', o�.3 �•...».r+, 1 k'y ',. ,t t f ♦ '•
•
,.; 8 _ '• R
•
. r
` , t
`\h , 33 34
r I 1 1 n' Mlle♦ 1,.. '
N 111S4 ,
i
. , .... p,„i,-,41,re. 4511 ,,,„a.
, , . , , ,..,....,.,, ,.
fr, NI mit ,, .., p-, -1., i
,. . - -,,,,.t i-.. . ;4.'. 't:5-. 41'' ',
Pit tiii,e..,firwip
/ Milk k
ST.:
yam. I. t G ',�.• '"e
/y `� •
, . , 4 ,' it ,--,i' 1 .
•
. •• ` 3,, ,
i .71 f
' M A t. I �•
's ' "tt.,,„si ,.' ill:, ,,,' a* g —''— '
I
.',' 1 MI Ilk ' t '., •,`' t
u
y
a.J
I
4
' I ' '''''',' . ' ' : 1' MT , r---
IaJ•
«
ti \ 1
i
a ,\
, A � it
! � :�y�.....,. i 441 w--,-- 4. M , •
I
• a
•
- _ __- -_...., - _. -._ • - _ 1 I - - - - _ _ , ',-. _ _ - - - - :
;_ 1 -4\ - --- __ . _ - - \ : 1\°\ \ -
v e
. _ _ - -- _ -\, _ - _ __ . - ,, - - _ _-, - - - 1
\i,
N4s'\*%, \
- 'i - ' . - -- - ' \it\‘'l-- - - - - . - -'-4 - - - '- \ '
‘ • _.--- \ \.„ -\‘t A_ \__ _ __ \:._ ,. _ _. -- . . . \ -__, ._- - . ., _,_ - _ _ . , ,..-, . .
. ___ __ _ :
N\ - ,c. _ __ 4,, . ' - _ ,...\ - 4, ,—,- . - _ _,,_k -.,..... -.--, . N-, - _--_-__ _ _ : _
,.. _ \ , , ,,,, \\ ,,,,, . , R,,, __ N _ __ _ ,
. N-__ - _ - , - - _ - - --.%_ - __ \ _ _. ,
_ , N 2 - - -'''-i\ _. -- sl,- . -:'
- ' I\ \\,- \ "t4s4 " . ' % -- - ''
-. - -% - - _ - _ -__-_ :.
- .N_'•-• \ . - - _ig --- --i•
•
•
I
•
.
14 1
•
i
L it
'
I
, !
•
y
1
N f
1,
• _
•
r
t
y
.
N
i
V
I
, , 41
r
r
.
•
I
I
i I
I I
' I
i I
r I
II
r •
t
•
u.uw
r
-='_ -
- 3
-- w
Is
A Vii.
--- i x - ti . , It
' - - - - .h. ..,- - - - : -
•
•
•-.-,
q�, 'e
x ,-... - _. t-- ,,... :.1 . ,, _,_ _ __ - :II_
•
,..' _ _,._ ' =- _ 4 - - - ---. --..,- . -1. lik..... ,t - _ ii\,, - _ - _
•
- - - - -- 1-- - - -- ,,,,,,,, f, \I, ‘, ,
- ‘ - -- - - -
, , ki 'vt -- _- --- ‘ __ , - -- - =
t 0-- ', - . _ i ,. i - t -,--„, f _i __ :
k gif ''f==',- i- i _ . \_,..% ‘ -:- _1 . N _ 'iii i . _ - - i -- - :.
t . \ , 'ti _., t
. -4 '.--`, s 1 ----- tic ; \ _ , 1. ,,, ,; s , _ -___- .!
, 1\ ''. .,-,„_ •- - - \ti, ,_, li , i s- , -- - i t'.., A . - _ I 1
y
i
F
i
x 4
z
e . .. _ . .
\ .
.,
.... --... _ _ - ;
__. _ _ :, . 1 _ _ , ,
•..._., , __ye t . . _ ;
t '4
f _ _
, _
_ _ 4
i
_ •
•
s - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - -- - --. • - / -. _••
•
•
I
•
•
•
. - «.L.,,rl� .A... .l.w ... ..A: ..�1r 1R>�. •..J,'.0 ..J a,JW.T.• .:An.4� ,• _ll ...« _ u.. ctn ' , ,
i III
•
r% ,,� c � � {IJ`' I yJW�•
as'i V
,��rpppVVV
``, .,
•
•�� 'AdMilluiv i r j11 CI,R..I,f ,w:.: '4Ul�tltM'r J
u
• " •
•
•
, I
11 Kean �esewm�'+w•artam�.*a,?m'its.'"��:?nnp+'w'�eaz�aern^r±ruwr3Y=:fit:"r81s.T'4@A59fSp"�..t^''�l.f•"'-4Sd7F„ 1,"LS,,rir` dC. 1
• r
•
•
•
•
v
w
• to ..� ��. nn"�1§S'��bIM'"l�YdA�1�.,"�ta� v v
. r
��41^/�Ri'' ;rk'.:'fir � r ;i��•. ,yrti b 1
1 , I kvl/ aNa 1
S� n 1trtl i s
•
•
•
•
•
I $
1 I
,elwwuuv�w ein„•:���n rr". .. •�•...x.:e .. r •.• .. .. �.•. .,. ;l. .: • -.-.
.urw`•.+L-x. ••wr,,.w�waw•� .'+••x.-w uw�wnnY:..lr.uvr 4+•�r.' • ,
• ,
•
•
{ {
/,.
4,.• I '
•
I
„r a.
x'
lVi `.KiYJk18 h141,:x 4!5',Git%xnt1.1,,t f.4i f.t./#,a1,..11tOehlr.+fgtRT'.#1`Nfd Atrogt, ptgk9r
YJPN''.:"tiJa^Za%aF,9wt°IaMN%••u'
a I
•
I
f.
. _,,fi tins I+t•t;i , + � r
•6.
.I t
•
I „
��, rxr:dam"
+ t i _ •,J•' Ix " it,�l,...,, °1 rid
,
II
•
n a,,,,
• I
' Ra1{ryNg111H'' .-..=�n I 4, 1 1,r I!W I IV
' i I •11 1'f
4; „ •
.
t•t9'� Ill I � 1
,
■ 1
I � I
, _ I
II
I,
•
a
•
•
r :
•
•
pVy
' F•'` �.,i,� �I Vd' six t
,,
!. 4+ l V.1.:.•J'• • Jet ' '• '•• 4' „
" . "
• c
Ali Sit i 't
,444.1.4,4,",'•,
' r �
I yr s
4 � � .i !i'�v' - � aka i
i_ +;,.qv"� r'y,L P4�;y,1X,� _ r ,�k i „t r r .;, ,5�(,�•,.I �
roc
•
•
, • ,
•
Jai
o '
I ,
1 ,
.,I
a ,
., a .�.,.,u•;a.;,,, ,•, , ,•.,�ur. , ��,.�.,r ,�„ ,.�. ..,,w ,:. � ,. ,...: _.. ..,, ,_..,.. , , .,: a.,.. . •.,.. � _ ,,,.,,�� ,..,_._., ...,,_._ ,,. .�„ , ,..,..,, „