The URL can be used to link to this page

SDR35-78 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. , , 400 P{IARc 217 '',BuSINEss`PAR Il 1 II, 'I \ i o l Site Deydlopcment., . .Pvi,ew, (SDS� 5 78) , ,,.� : ., 12140.i s 171. Hail Botilcevar 1 �. ,f 1 . . , ,._ _ .,i.1.1, ,,vx,,,Lt9..,.u'awl,;J..w,,,,,,,w3.:.uw::;«s.,....,,-,.ra..:.1'v:>W-:+„,,,R,.,a,1w.�,:::x,,.tu.4.W4cr ,,q,,:rl, ,,..::.,,..,._,,_.I.,r...,.,:,.x,h«._,,,.,,...,:_,._.....;_;.w,,,.u...:,..,uw....., ...,._..�wd.:.a.,.....,::,IS ° , i I I I I • „ II I 1, • ■ I ./ • • • • • • • V I • • I . . • I I • I, rll ' JI • .• j fir'• ' .9 . ;, .,. ':,' ! .',.'s .• (b) Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Mickelson to approve. , Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 14. ORDINANCE No. 78-76 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10.28 PARKING OF THE TIGARD •' ', MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING SECTION 10.28.170 PROHIBITING PARKING IN SPECIFIED PLACES. (a) Chief of Police recommended approval. ' (b) Motion by Cour,•cl.Lman Cook, seconded by Councilman Mickelson to approve. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. ;. 8:00 P.M. _ PUBLIC HEARINCS 15. ZONE CHANGE ZC 36-77 (Western Racquet Club) NPO #5 A request by Western Racquet Club to amend general development plan and program (approved on June 30, 1978) in a C-3 "General Commercial" zone of parcel totaling : • 20.75 acres at S.W. Garden Place and Pacific Highway (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 1BB, Tax Lots 200, 300, 800, 1100, 1101, and 1200). )°,1' (a) Associate Planner stated Planning Commission recommended approval. i (b) ORDINANCE No. 78-77 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE No. 78-44, ADOPTED ON • JULY 24, 1978 WITH RESPECT TO AN APPLICATION BY WESTERN +- RACQUET CLUB FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE 1970 ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF TIGARD, CHANGING THE ZONE DISTRICT OF A TRACT OF LAND AT S.W. GARDEN PLACE, AND PACIFIC HIGHWAY AND 1 • DEPICTED ON WASHINGTON COUNTY TAX MAP 2S1 1BB, AS TAX LOTS 200, 300, 800, 1100, 1101, AND 1200 FROM CITY OF TIGARD "C-3" AND +'M-3" TO CITY OF TIGARD 11C_3/M-3 PD" COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT; AND BY ADDING HERETO . ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS AND ADOPTING EXHIBITS "A", 9tB", & U "C",, GRANTING THE APPLICATION AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE 1 DATE. i . i (c) Motion by Councilman Mickelson, seconded by Councilman Cook to adopt. (d) Councilman Scheckla questioned the reason for deleting the covered tennis courts. Don Stassen, Architect for Western Racquet Club, stated the deletion of the • • tennis courts was Eot economic res[r‘ts since they would not be used year round, • Ordinance No. 78-77 approved by unanimous' vote of Council. M«F,w«o,aru.,.v..aa,.at.,,w.w., 16. ZONE CHANGE ZC 21-78 (Donald Pollock) `" A request by Donald Pollock fora zone map amendment from Wash: Co. S-1 Single- Family Dwe114,mg" to City R-7 "Single-Family Residential" zone for a 1.29 acre parcel at 9330 S.W. Durham Road (Wash. Co. Tax Map 251 14A, Tax Lot 500). (a) Associate Planner reported Planning Commission recommended approval;' " " E No. 7 ADOPTING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO AN � � (b) ORDINANCE �78 AN "� APPLICATION BY DONALD E.. POLLOCK FOR AN AMENDMENT TO • REGULAR COUNCIL MINUTES November,27, 1'978 - Page 3' • 4 j ' l . .a. ___,...01, ) , ; , • THE 1970 ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF, TIGARD CHANGING THE ZONE DISTRICT FOR A TRACT OF LAND AT 9330 S.W. DURHAM WASHINGTON COUNTY TAX MAP 2S1 lAA, DADDEPICTEDON ROAD N TAX LOT 500, FROM WASHINGTON COUNTY "S-1" TO CITY OF TIGARD "R-7" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL' AND ADOPTING EXHIBITS "A",' "B", AND "C", GRANTING THE APPLICATION AND • FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (c) Motion by Councilman Nickelson, seconded by Councilman Cook to approve. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. ZONE CHANGE ZC 19-78 Miller Potter, & Schaeffer) NPO #2 17. Zo ( � ° A request by Miller, Potter and Schaeffer for a zone map 'amendment from A-2 "Mul ti- Family Residential" zone to C-3 "General Commercial" zone for a 4.01 acre parcel at 10830 SW Greenburg Rd, (Wash. Co. Tax Map 181 35B, Tax Lot 400). A,N) (a) Associate Planner noted Planning Commission recommended approvals . (b) ORDINANCE No. 78-79 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO AN, .,.... APPLICATION BY GERALD V. MILLER, C.G. POTTER AND R.M. SCHAEFFER FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE 1970 ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF TIGARD CHANGING THE ZONE DISTRICT FOR A , TRACT OF LAND AT 10830 S.W. GREENBURG ROAD AND CASCADE • BLVD. , AND DEPICTED ON WASHINGTON COUNTY TAX MAP 151 35B, TAX LOT 400, FROM CITY OF TIGARD "A-2" MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO CITY OF TIGARD "C-3" GENERAL COMMERCIAL AND ADOPTING EXHIBITS ttA", ttB", AND "Ce', GRANTING THE APPLICATION AND FIXING AND EFFECTIVE DATE. t . . (c) Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Nickelson to approve. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 18. ZONE CHANGE Z0 17-77 (Donald Pollock) NPO #4 A request by Donald E. Pollock to amend condition No. 7 of Ordinance No. 77-72 (approved by City Council 8/22/77), The parcel of land is located on 7.1 acres at S.W. 89th Avenue and S.W. Manzanita (Wash. Co. Tax Map IS1 35AD, Tax Lots 1600, 1700; and Tax Map 1S1 35DA, Tax Lots 2500 64_ 3900). (a) Associate Planner stated he did not have adequate information regarding this item and Mr. Pollock had not appeared to present the item. (b) Motion by Councilman Scheckia, seconded by Councilwoman Stimler to table item until applicant is available to present request. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. (c) Mayor Bishop requested citizens who had signed up to speak regarding request` be notified of new heating date by mail. 19. ZONE CHANGE APPEAL - "C 17-78 (Way W. Lee) NPO #4 , The Planting Commission denial of a request by Way W. Lee fora zone map amend- from R-7 "Single d. to C-3 " - " for a en�,1. " e� ne �, ,�,d `� �aa.n le Family Residential"� to ,C 3 Cen,erd Cotnmero�.a,l zci e REGULAR COUNCIL MINUTES - November' 27, 1978 Page .4 ,..r...w..,,,.a.,..,,,_,.._....w....... ..,..�w.a.ex,. I ,Th%. , ; 1 AGENDA i?,, t TIGARL`. PLANNING CO1'v1MISSIO'N ' October 3, 1978 - 7 : 30 P .M. • Fowler Junior High - Lecture Room , ,.• . 10865 S,W. Walnut St. - Tigard, Oregon • 1. CAI /. TO ORDER: 2. ROLL CALL: 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: ' ~ 4. COMMUNICATIONS: 5 . HEARING ITEMS: A, Staff Report E. Applicant' s Presentation ' ' C ` Public Testimony �, O a . Proponent' s ', b. ,'pp;)nent' s , . G. CroL s-examination D • aff Recc,rxnendation • '' E. C..cmmission Discussion and action 5. 1 ZCTE CHANGE ZC 17-78 (Way W. Lee) NPO ##4 A Leanest by Way W. Lee for a zone map amendment from R-7 "Single " Family Residential" to C-3 ' General Commercial'' zone for a 5 acre ' parcel at S.W. 69th. Avenue (Wash, Co:. Tax Map 1S1 36AD, Tax Lot 6502 southern portion. 5. 2 ZONE CHANGE ZC 36-77 (Western Racquet Club) NPO #5 A a f' « - A request by Western Racquet Club to amend general development . plan and program (approved on. June 30, 1978) -in a C-3 "General Commercial" zone of parcel totalling 20 .75 acres at S.W. Garden " Place & Pacific Highway (Wash. Co, Tax Map 2S1 1BB, TaX Lots 200, 300, 800, 1100, 1101, and 1200) . ' 5. 3 VARIANCE V 8-78 (Van Domelen & Looij enga & Assoc. ) NPO #5 ' A request by Van Domelen & Looijenga: & Assoc, fbr variance to side and rear yard*. setbacks in a M-3 zone to construct a warehouse on 1. 09 acre parcel at S .W. 72nd. Avenue (Tax Map 251 12D, Tax Lot 2400) • ' 5 ,4 SUBDIVISION S 4-78 (Angelynn) NPO 4.2 A request by Michael Mahon & Leon BruneaU to amend condition #1 of Subdivision S 4-78 on a 2, 28 acre pr'cei in a R-7 "Single Family Residential" zone at S.W.f 95th Avenue North of S.W. Commercial St. (Wash, Co. Tax Map 1S1 35C1J, Tax Lot 2400) . 5. 5 CCNDIT 1 OVAL USE CU 24-78 (Shady Lane office Complex) NPO 42 . Kenneth Lewis for a conditional use c Theodore Bare . A . .��ve�t b�, 'Theo o pent to construct a professional t f'f ce-building on a 1.54 acre - 1;` : .!1" a A-2 "Multifamily Residential" zone and C-3 "General 7 : � . . c ..44.1" zone at Shady Lane (Wash Co Tai: Map 1Sl 35B, Tax Lots 6 : t7, S 1 �. �> 'y r 741 Y� �.` ww Y.� i1 II ii MINUTES 4 T . TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION • October 3, 1978 Fowler Junior High - Lecture Room 10865 S .W. Walnut - Tigard, Oregon 1. Call to Order: The meeting was called to order at 7 :40 P.M. d 2 . Roll Call: Present: Corliss, Brian, Funk, Smith, Tepedino, Wood Absent: Quimby, Rossman Staff: Weaver, Selby, Mackenzie ... 3. Approval of Minutes: The minutes of September 5, 1978 were approved as read with the , ' • following change: "Removal of Brian as second for the first • ' motion on Page 4" , A ' 4. Communications: • r :r A. Weaver presented information on extension courses for . the Planning Commissioners. B. Weaver spoke on enabling ordinances and writing new ordinances , with regard to the position of planning commissioners, non•- performarce, excused abs .Inces, etc. C. Tepedino stated, "That three or more unexcused absences was cause for removal from the Planning Commission, but the removal must be " approved by the Council" . Stated that, "there was a need for a definition of "unexcused" absence" , D. Smith stated, "that the rules alre.ad'Ar exist° E. Selby presented a Written memo to the Planning Commission members on the subject of closing meetings by 12 midnight F. Tepedino suggested considering items at 11 p.m. for hearing the same evening or postponing' until the- following public, hearing. Weaver leave at 8:10 P.M. 5. Public Hearings : 5. 1 Zone Change ZC 17--78 (Way W. Lee) NPO 44 a A request by Way W. Lee for a zone map amen dment from R-7 "Single Fami ly Residential" to C-3 "General Canztercia l' zone for a 5 acre parcel at SW. 69th Avenue (Wash. Co, Tax Map 1S1, 36AD, Tax Tot 6502 , Southern portion) . A♦ Staff Repoi t n Read by Selby MINUTES \ „ TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION October 3, 1978 � . . Page B. Applicant's Presentation: Ken Cole, Architect for the project stated that buildings would step down the site and conform to the natural features of the landscape. He agreed that there was '`a drainage problem. Stated that the signal would be installed by August ' , 1 1979 according to the Oregon Traffic Control. Stated that they would be removing some vegetation. C. Public Testimony: None D. Staff Recommendation: I A. Staff Recommends denial for the following reasons: " 10 The impact of the upgraded use will 'exist before proper 1 traffic control can be financed and emplaced, Therefore traffic congestion and hazardous conditions will ' increase. 2. The applicant is attempting to provide maximum potential,/ of the property with its requested zoning, giving no •1 regard to the natural topography, down stream flood . impact, excessive grading, preservation of significant vegetation, and retention of the natural drainageway. • 3. Applicant should resubmit planned unit development for request >d zoning that will ,r i „igate the concerns stated. • D. Cross-examination: o Ken Cole stated that the drawings submitted that night • were not necessarily final and that the design review "lrocess was a, thorough one, He read .a letter into the minutes to the Planning staff from`June 1978 Mr, Cole stated that they (the applicants) had attempted to work with staff but had not had the opportunity to do ,so o Selby stated that it was up to the applicant that was to ��initiate • contact and meetings with the planning staff, E. Commission. Discussion and Action: impervious p footage of a o �Ce wino asked for the square fo si� daces : Was the property to be mostly ave0? o Smith asked about the possibility of underground parking? o Cole stated that it was possible. o Selby read possible conditions tions into t inu tes for approval: ` � �"' 1. + the minutes u p � • ..1 p MINUTES '. TIGARD PLANNING C >1SSION � . " October 3, 1978 Page3 1. That the site construction and drainage plan be sub- mitted and approvea by the Planning, Building and Engineering Departments prior to the issuance of permits.soil test and anal 2. That sol compaction nation be submitted analyzation approval by. the Engineering and Building Departments . prior to issuance of permits. 3. That downstream impact due to development of site drain plan be submitted and approved by the Engineering Dept. ' submit a letter State Highway 4 . That the applicant b,y g y , • Department indicating projected date for placement of ' . signal light at '69th 'and 99W Highway o Wood stated that the Planning Commission was not compelled to upgrade zoning even if in accord with the Comprehensive Plan. Thought that the property was a candidate for a planned development. o Smith thought that the Commissioners could require a planned development and that there was a need to reduce the amount " of paving. o Wood moved to deny with the staff findings and recommendation, ' o Brian seconded the motion. • Motion passed unanimously. 5. 2 Zone Change ZC 36-77 (Western Racquet_Club) NPO #5 • A request by Western Racquet Clubs to amend the General Develop- ment Plan and Program (approved on June 30 , 1978) in a C-3 "Generall', Commerciale. zone o parcel totaling 20 .75 acres E atS°W.aG d Garden �I Place and acific Highway (Wash. Co. ax ap S, T 200, 3O0, 800, 1100, 1101 and 1200) . � . A. Staff Report a Read by Selby ;. i B. Applicant' s Presentation Ron Statsny, Architect/Planner for the project eXpla.ined" the changes in the plan. C. Public Testimony: o Ann Craig g of S.W. Xn o l l Drive stated�edtf � s the grading o f the adjacent property t her property swampy. Wanted to know if, the street vacation of Garden Pa,xk had." been completed? • .,,..,.,;„,H,r,:,„. w; ..„,.".u., . ,,. _. .,.,^.w.a..wwwm....•wom.,a'fr{.. y • I 1 1 + MINUTES �� b; • TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION October 3, 1978 Page 4 o Statsny stated that the vacation had not been completed yet,. ; o Wood asked if the staff recommendation was in accordance with'. Policy #7 as far as the open space and the flood plain areas were concerned? 2 about the 225 foot • o Carl Bunke spoke .. road width. o Brian asked about the number of parking spaces required and the possibility of underground parking? s , o Ann Craig wanted to know the required setback from residential property? o Janice Kaylor an adjacent property owner wanted to know the types and times of truck travel. D. Staff Recommendation: A. Staff recommended approval with the following conditions : 1. That the construction and site drainage plans with retention pond illustration be approved by the Engineering and Building Department prior, to issuance of permits. 2. That soil compaction tests and soil analysis report of d the site be received and approved by the Engineering and Building Department prior to plan check approval . , (especially in regard to ,,d€ e opment of the flood plain. 3.. If the Planning Commission chooses to locate the alignment o g n Hunziker at a future dater ' then a street plug must be located at the end of Hunziker on the property line. Also, public road from flail Blvd. throu to Hunziker alignment should be standard to local collector 50 feet right-..of-way' with 34 feet of paving. 4. Due to the heavy vehicle use, the cross section view �,' n-site roads must' improved to 8" - 212 and � ; be iri�p ved of the d ads i 3/4" asphalt (commercial street, standard) . 5. The proposed 'service alley must be marked "one way" 1,raffia. 6. Remove the proposed medium um on the east sid e of the egress a rea from the s er vic e alley. 7. service all ey mu st be c minimu m of 34 feet vi de, paved with and access-cess being 34 feet, egress ct, II I I I .r,i vW e4.vn',r...M..r V..a. .0 .,•.n .n vr. n., .....,..,, .-.i.., i,.. ..i., ......i.... ,.i..-, .-r r . I..r... .,. ,n.,., .-. ....,... .r . i . VI I . • • • . , MINUTES TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION • October 3, 1978 Page 5 8 . If the improvement for parking lot on flood plain is approved, the elevation must not be altered. Improvement to "Flood Plain District Standards" must be met prior to Building Department issuance of permits . 9. Driveway aprons must be shown as approved by Engineering. , Department prior to final plat approval. 10 . Access road from 99W must be dedicated to the City with minimum paving of 34 feet. I . E. Commission Discussion and Action: o Wood stated that he had difficulty with the treatment of flood plain areas. o Tepedino agreed, he did not think there should be parking on it. o Funk thought that the flood plain issue was being overdone. o Brian preferred underground parking and no through street. , o Corliss was opposed to amending' the general plan now. o Wood moved for approval with conditions #4, 5, 6 , 7 , 9 , 10 as written and the following: 1) That no change occur with regard to the flood plain treatment as proposed in the '7 'evious plan. 2) That the variance of 25 feet for building setback as ' • shown on the proposed plan be approved but with the required landscape buffer to be approved by Site Design • Review Board. o Smith seconded the motion and added condition 3) that parking code requirements be met. The motion passed unanimously. 5. 3 Variance V 8- 78 (Van Domelen & Loot jenga & Associates) NL0 #5 A request by Van Domelen & Looijenga & Associates for variance to side and rear yard setbacks in a M-3 zone to construct a warehouse on a 1. 09 acre parcel at S.W. 72nd Avenue (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 12D, Tax Lot 2400) . A. Staff Report: Read b Selby y • • , I. MINUTES TIGARD PLANNING COmmiSSION October 3, 1978 Page 6 B. Applicant' s Presentation Dirk Looijenga, Engineer for the project representing Caufieid/ Urbana presented a site plan and explained the applicant's need for a variance, disagreed with the staff site description and findings. Duane Christy, Realtor, stated that the adjacent property . owner to the north, supported the request for a variance., ` C. Public Testimony: a. Proponent: o Winn McDonald, 8340 S.W. Ross, stated he was in favor of a zone setback so long as no other property owner was ' adversely affected. ba Opponent: o Harold Mazatto was against the proposal. He represented , ' the developer to the south. Stated that there was a • proposed office complex for the site to the south which would have windows facing the requested zero setback on the adjacent property. Da Staff Recommendation: Staff recommended denial for the rationale stated in the conclusionary findings, E. Commission Discussion and Action o Smith was for denial of the proposal. o Brian and Corliss agreed, o Brian stated that the applicant had, not carried the burden of proof in his application. o Smith moved to deny on the grounds that the applicant had not carried the burden, of proof in his application for the need for a variance due to extreme and unusual circumstances, o Corliss seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. 5. 4 Subd.ivision S 4-78 (Angelynn) NPO #2 A. request by Michael Mahon Leo n S 'ne � to amend condition �l of subdivision Residential" , zone � W. �P Avenue,'parcel' �an � 7 "Single subdivision S 4-78 on a 2, 28 acre arcel in a rt g e Family'y . at 8.W. 9 5th Avenue north. of SW. Street h„ Co. T w �c�mi�nercial� troet �GVas• � a�t��'�1�ap 151 �35CT3, Tax Lot 2400) . L • ' 1 J •♦ Y _ • • • • MINUTES " TIGARD PLANNING COY.AISSION' October 3,3, 19 7 8 Pagel ' A. Staff Report: Read by Selby B. Applicant's Presentation Monty Davis representing the applicant stated that they wanted to eliminate condition #1' of their subdivision approval because of street and, residence location. To improve that section of street the result would not be adequate for t housing on the street in that it would 'cut within four fec... an existing garage. I; C. Public Testimony: a. Proponent: • I • Suzanne a was for the proposal. Stated that she ' ! , o �uz�.nne Sc g� p p would loose considerable property. - o Vern Christensen of NPO 42 was in agreemento b. Opponent: o Dale Maliger objected to the survey. States being placed ' on his property. o Albus Emfelt was against the subdivision appr•oval. �, o Mike Stan stated that he was for 'lifting the dedication of a 60 Ifoot right-of-way. � h , b. Staff Recommendation: • Staff recommended approval with the revised condition #Z. • 1. That a non-remonstrance agreement be signed by the applicant providing for the future improvements on 95th (LID - 95th }, Avenue) . This revised condition will replace the former is condition #1 of June 8, 1978 i E. Commission Discussion and Action: o Smith asked who paid for streets? o Selby stated the developer. o Wood moved for approval with the modification of Condita.on. #1 as follows: 1) That the developer enter into an agreement acceptabl e to staff guaranteeing a future half street improve,gent to be made to loca , street standards along 8.W. 95th for the north ;E • east property, line Of tax lot 2400 to, the southeast propert.. y line of taX lot 2401, such agreement to be secured by or o bonding , other secutity acceptable by Staff, � � � � � U„, j . _ , • • • MINUTE TIGARD PLANNING. COMMISSION October 3, 1978 • Page 8 ° o Smith seconded the motion. The motion, passed unanimously. , •I 5. 5 Conditional Use CU 24-78 (Shady Lane Office Complex) NPO #2 • A request by Theodore Bare and Kenneth Lewis for 'a conditional •- use' permit to. construct a professional office building on a 1.54 ° acre parcel in an A-2 "Multifamily Residential" acne and a C-3 "General Commercial" zone at Shady Lane (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 35B, Tax Lots 201 and 203) . A. Staff Report: 1 Read by Selby •'• B. Applicant's Presentation: • Tom Hammon, Architect for the project stated that the buildings were not on the flood plain Explained the project and its layout. C. Public Testimony: None D. Staff Recommendation: A. Staff recommended approval subject to the following i^ conditions: 1. That the identified Greenway area within the property • boundaries be dedicated to the City• and maintained by the owner to tre City' s requirements. 2. That the Greenway, area be left in it's natural state with the exception of the owner cleaning out the dead ,�. or dying vegetation. 3. That the applicant meets all requirements of the �`lo (Chapter ) prior re f i od x . Plain I�a.strict (Ch.a r 18 a 57 p ' or to approval of building permit issuance. [, 4. That the, applicant relocate the proposed southern 'off icE, building away from the flood plain area of 162 foot contour and that aJ i. buildings be no less than. ..three ' i feet the identified flood plain level. , drainage plans • 5 o Site d s 'must be submitted and approved }aY' sk\, the trigineerinq and Bu. ildin g Departments tments tor their approv al p rior to issuance of an y permits. 8. Itebuttal a Tom F amnion questioned the dedication of the property for r' Greenway. 8tated that the parking area would then be 07'1 City property: u • f r. 1 , , i 4.' MINUTES 'C. T'IGARD PLANNING COMMISSION + October 3, 1978 Page 9 E. Commission Discussion and Action: as o Smith stated that the development mostly 1 p y as halt and P building. !' o Conies thought that the project ''should have tO go to the Design Review Board o Wood explained the three° foot flood height clearance , and stated that the greenway dedication was to keep the flood ' plain clear. o Tepedino, did not think that parking should be allowed in the, flood plain. o Smith stated that the flood plain and greenway were not synonymous' o Wood moved for approv al with staff conditions #2 & #� as written and condition #4 modified to read, "That the applicant locate the proposed southern office building so that i..li buildings are no less than 11 feet ''above the identified '"That the :Lend- ' flood plain level,, and adding condition #6, soaping be submitted to the Site Design Review Board for' r approval" . o Brian seconded the motion • Motion carried. Funk agai nst. y 6. Other Business None P , 7. Adjournment; The meeting was adjourned at 12 :05 a.m, • n • ST • AFF REPORT • . AGENDA 5 .2 r a TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION October 3, 1978 7 : 30 P.M. - • Fowler Junior High -- Lecture Room r 10865 S .W. Walnut St. Tigard, Oregon an ,,, Docket: Zone Change ZC 36-77 (Western Racquet Club) Request: To amend the general, development plan and program o (approved on June 30 , 19 78) in a C-3 "General Commercial" ° ., zone of parcel totalling 20 . 75 acres . .' Location: S .W. Garden Place & Pacific Highway (Wash. Co. Tax Map � � � 2S1 lEB, Tax Lots 200 ,300, 800 ,1100, 1101 and 1200) . ) Applicant : Western Racquet Club f 1 -, ' n s o of '�'ac.t: z 'n�i Finings f 1. The general development plan and program approved a combination ,. r of recreational racquet ball., tenn?.s courts and warehouse, • industrial units. (See Planning Commission Minutes with previous staff, report attached) . I ,,, 4 2 . The applicant is requesting an amendm ant' to revise the I. . proposed uses, accesses and square footage. 3. The alteration will amplify industrial use, lower recreational v ' . use; increase large ..ruck traffic and decrease square 4 • foot of building size. 4. The site is designated "Retail Commercial" in the northern 1 - portion of the site and "Light Industrial" in the southern ., portion on the NPO #5 Plan and currently zoned C-3 ' Retail Commercial" and /1-3 "Light Industrial k , , 5 . The applicant is requesting general plan and program review - of of a two phase commercial/commercial professional/industrial H .. planned development on parcels totalling 20. 135 acres in t • accordance with Section 18 . 56d030 of the Tigard Municipal Code. iiigh7,0ay should be clustered and share col-non parking facil i t`z es , r � 1 occurs, > '7 of access and dri'v ways, As .7,ew deve l opm.n t oc u�. s, thy; number o,� prints should d not exceed the, number ne 'essavy for proper on-sibs , traffic oir'culation and,; where possible, should be combined with ace a,.4 to adjacent businesses, i Policy : E'rirn .t the amount of* 'comrlercial development to occur in the iw ustr'ial area, allowing only soma rowt c of existing retail and s'rt '1 commercial in the area. 6 . Applicable policies from the Environmental Design and Open . r,'"" Space Plan: Polio' : The City shall restrict alteration of natural drai rgetOays ' ' ,... i, ... ..,,.w.., ., .....................,,..-n,•..<..o.,..,.,,,,..i. ,. _.,, ,...,.. ., ..,..,,.» , .W a,..,w-«..mow.,•.,. '"'�,,,,,, .,. ,.. .,.A ,,...,,,. „_,,; ..r .,..,, r ' *. 14- r STAFF REPORT (%,. rw AGENDA 5 . 2 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION October 3, 1978 - 7: 30 P .M. i . Page 2 unless it can be demonst paled that the benefits are greater than the detrimental effects• Other jurisdictions is in the' 4 anno Creek Basin shall be encouraged to do the some ;/. . Policy 5: The City shc7t adopt an o,rrinznoe to regulate the .removal and/or replacement of�existing natural vegetation in designated'areas (E'Zood Plains, drainage?ays, areas of high visibility, unique habitats or rare , species) • Significan trues or stands of timber shaZi also be protected. . Policy b:` Require a site development report (e.g. hydrology, soils, geology) for major projects in designated areas and a statement's reflecting methods to be used to minimise the run-off erosion impact of the development on' the surrounding area and downstream properties. Policy 7: Retain the 100 year flood plain of E'anno Creek, its tributaries, 1 4 and the Tualatin River as an open preserve (Greenway) The gr?eenway shalt be established as the backbone of the open space network and, when a direct pub l i,c benefit can be derived, i.e., when adjacent residential development, the greenway , rrou7,d be developed for passive recreation and pe4estrian/bike Crave . 7 . On November 1, 1977 the Tigard Planning Commission approved a prel,iminary plan and program for this site subject to the following conditions 1 . That preliminary approval only be given to the general concept of the PD. 2 . That approval of Iodation and intensity of use must await submission of more detailed plans to include traffic and flood plain studies. 3 . The applicant must be prepared to show that , by encroaching , into the flood plain, the fill will neither decrease the amount of storage capacity nor increase the run-off from the site. r. 4 . A flood plain fill permit application be submitted. S . A minor land partition application be made for Tax Lot 400 (Tax Map 2S1 l.BB) 6 . That a drainage plan be submitted for appi'oval (to pay particular attention to the effect on adjacent sites) . II , Conclusionary ?indings 1 . The proposed Industrial Unit ''1D will increase' the need for truck traffic and traffic 'increase, onto Flail Blvd. or 99W. 2 . The need for .increase of parking space creates the use to improve rove Qp parking on the flood plain. (. n llR t r 4 _/ham STAFF REPORT AGENDA, 5 .2 T.TGARD PLANNING3 . The prop V Lid development is being p fled in two phases . The COMMISSION first phase . will consist of ground preparation and the , • Page 3 construction of 69 , 232 square feet of commercial office and recreation facilities . 'Phase II will be the construction of a light industrial complex consisting of eight (8) buildings . . totalling 115 ,200 square feet of gross floor area. 4 . The site slopes from the north to the south, dropping from approximately 210 feet MSL at Pacific Highway to 150 feet MSL at the south property line. Considerable earth fill has taken place on the upper portion of the site, resulting in a tier , effect. The apolicant envisions locating the commercial offices and recreation facility on the newly created fills. The ' southern portion of the site is relatively flat and contains . , a pond. Red Rock Creek, which flows out of the northeast and , passes under Highway 217, continues through the southeast • • portion of the parcel and serves s the primary source of water for the pond. Crystal Lake, which was formerly in the south- eastern corner of the site, has been graded over. • • 5. The site is surrounded on the east by Highway 217, to the south by industrial development and single family residential (southwest) ; to the west and across Hall Boulevard are apart- ' • c;., ments; and to the north retail stores, a service station, and . • Pacific Highway. • ' 6 . The applicant has essentially incorporated into his general plan and program the conditions of preliminary 'approval. Based on the revised site plan, conditions 3, 4 , and 5 have become • moot points for the following reasons : ' r , a Although a portion of the site does fall with the 100 year flood plain (note: new elevations for the 100 year flood plain have been recently calculated by the US . Army Corp. of Engineers as of April 1978) no building encroachment is being proposed within the flood, plain and subsequently there would not be a need for a flood plain fill permit. • b. Tax Lot 400 which was proposed to serve as an overflow parking lot for the recreational and commercial areas has been eliminated as part of the total project area and the parking demands for these uses are to be accommodated on the remaining portion of the . site as submitted in the general site plan. 7 , An update traffic impact study for the site has been conducted by Carl Buttke, P .E. Consulting Engineer (see traffic study in booklet) 8 . See previous staff report (June 20 , 1978) for Code DeViation, The required and planned parking lots has been amended 'anare satisfa6tory to the staff'. Acccss -17,o the parking lots has been approved to be narrowed to 20 feet... A revision of 30 feet (code Standards) would be favorable due to the increase in traffic On site and the extension of parking lots , 474. • ti • . _ .w _., •.o _.....a,-..,�,.. .ate . STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5. 2 TIGIRD PLANNING COMMISSION October 3, 1978 7 : 30 P .M. • .Page 4 �� ' � �� T 9 . with the parking lot proposed on the flood plain., the open space and landscaping will be less than the previous 50% approved. 10 . The previous Conclusionary Findings (Item #2) states : d "There will be no encroachment into the 100 year flood plain. " •, This may have been a serious consideration by the previous • staff. Caution should be taken in considering approval of use in this area. . 11. Item #3 of: the Conclusionary Findings states: "Access Access has been provided onto Hunziker Street for the industrial traffic , ' anticipated to be generated by this development. This third . . access/egress wi7,1 help to lessen the traffic impacts on Hall Blvd. and Pacific H.ighway. However, staff concurs with the Engineering Department that a dedicated public right-oil-,gay should exist through the site from Hall Blvd. to Pacific Highway. Future access to Hunziker creates two concerns a. If accessis to be aligned with future development of the - 7— .—— property south onto Hunziker, ; the proposed road on the industrial site will have to be dedicated public right-- of-way and proper standards should be required. This • public access would then add to the on-site traffic' generation and possibly cause congestion with the mixed vehicle usage. .b. If the alignment was dissolved or restricted on Hunziker, then the on--site traffic would be limited .to Hail Bvld. f • or 99W and congestion may occur at the access, points. •. Also, there would be less distribution of traffic III . Staff Recommendations Staff recommends approval subject to the following conditions: 1. That the construction and site drainage plains with retention pond illustration be approved b y the Engineering 0 illustration Pp y h gxnee.�ing and. Building • Departments prior to issuance of permits . 2 . That soil compaction tests and soil analysis report of the site be received and approved the Engin: ring and Building Department prior to plan check approval (especially in regard to development of the flood plain) , 3 . If the Planning Commission chooses to locate the alignment on I unziker at a future date, then a street plug must be located at the end of .Ru,nziker on the property line: Also A public road �from Hall Blvd. .,through to Hunziker alignment should. he standard to local colt A::1-:or 50 feet right-of-way with 34 d feet o f: paving. • e — a i I • STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5 . 2 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION October 3, 1978 - 7: 30 P.M. Page 5 r 1 I 4. Due to the 'heavy vehicle use, the cross section view of the on-site roads must be improved to 8" - 2 1/2 and 3/4" asphalt (commercial street standard) . n 5 . The proposed service alley must be marked l one way is traffic 6 . R emove the' p ro pos ed medium on the eas t side' of the egress s . e area from the service alley. . I n 7 . Service alley must be a minimum of 34 feet wide, paved with egress and access being 34 feet. 8. If improvement for parking lot on flood plain is approved, the elevation must not be altered. Improvement to "Flood Plain District Standards" must be met prior to building department issuance of permits . 9 . Driveway aprons must be shown as approved by Engineering Department prior to final plat approval. 10 . Access road from 99W mist be dedicated to the city with minimum paving of 34 feet. • f � r i I ^ ^ -..,.i, .. ,.r.r..r r r r W r....r rirr.,..a'vw+,.u.r.r.r r.uu r W r.uur.r..i+a.,lv nra re I . v.r..r r.r r, n r .. .r w,.v r r u r,r r i' r.�,. ..�'^.•,-.,rr.* .Iww.r,rr+wwn•rnrav6�sn M•s'N"Jy.,.�n .rr',,o. .r�.I, r.f r J r..+,rr r..r N � m r ,.,v.r r. r,.� - 1 • 1 • • • • ,410111AVIN \ INSSTBRAT key.% 1' RACIST CLUB a • 8785 S.W.Beaverton-Hillsdale Hwy. Portland,Oregon 97225 503/297-3723 • • , ugust 2 , 1978 • • Mr. Aldie Howard Planning Director (Interim) 12420 SW Main Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 Subject: Site Design Review Park 217 Business Center Dear Mr. Howard: r Enclosed is a revised General Site Plan indicating the present configuration of the development. The adjustments in the f, proposed plan and program are a result of the Planning Commission recommendations and further "marketability" and economic analysis of the project. The adjustments are as follows: , 1. The incorporation of dedicated street, built to commercial • • street standards with 36 feet of pavement and S foot sidewalks connecting Hall Blvd. , to Pacific Highway via Garden Place (Planning Commission, City Council recommendations) . . • 2. Proposed realignment of access road to easement connect- , ing to S. W. Hunziker (southeast corner of property) to allow for retaining and extending the man-made pond at that corner of the property. ■ 3. Utilization of the Flood Plain area for a parking and 4 • \ truck lay-by reservoir to relieve parking requirements along the dedicated street connecting Hall Blvd. and Garden Place and spaces lost due to landscaping and size restrictions during Design Review. 4, Refinement of the program for the Commercial Office/ Recreation Building resulting in deletion of the covered tennis courts, replacement of tennis court area with a detached Light Industrial Building, increasing the 20 racquetball courts to a total of 21, and increasing the Commercial Office space proposed. The net effect of the program changes results in a decrease of building • ground coverage of 5275 square feet. The building areas • are as follows: ) • . , del 1417IN `WETSN tik RACQUET LU B • 8785 S.W.Beaverton-Hillsdale Hwy. Portland,Oregon 97225 503/297-3723 Revised Preliminary General General Plan Plan Plan Commercial Offjce: 36, 000 g.s.f. 44, 220 g.s.f. 54, 000 g.s.f. Recreation Facilities: 107 ,900 g. s.f. 87,300 g. s.f. 51,300 g.s.f. Light Industrial: 127 ,300 g. s.f. 115,200 g. s.f. 144 ,100 g.s.f. Total Building Area 271,200 g. s.f. 246,720 g.s.f. 249,400 g.s.f. This program refinement results in the following parking demand: Commercial Office: 54,000 g. s.f. x 1 space/350 g.s. f. = 154 spaces Recreation Facilities: 21 courts x 3 spaces/court = 63 spaces Light Industrial: 144, 100 g. s.f. x l/space/1000 g. s.f.= 144 spaces Total Parking Requirement 3.61 Total Parking Shown 367 The additional Light Industrial Building (Industrial Unit D) is located adjacent to the planned industrial area and within the prior M-3 zone. The deletion of the tennis courts and increase in the racquetball courts is in response to lenders' concerns regarding recreation facilities. The recreation facilities are now approximately 20% of the total project. The building appear- , ance and structure of Industrial Unit D will be compatible with the Commercial Office/Recreation structure. We welcome your comments and await your Site Design Review findings. As we have demonstrated over the past year, we are working toward development of a project that is an economic and physical asset , . to the City of Tigard. Sincerely, WESTERN RACQUET CLUBS, INC. • Ronald 0,, More, secretary /clm Enc. ( pti 0 , r \ • • • ; • • 01,1171 '00100, eriema 121111'41r • • • • • • rr'n�5i .s AP.rr•", r i.. .,r, ..n INFA4lIp.C�. ...y �F'Y-T+r•^^•-. �` .. .. ^, , � �iF#MeXRNr•mwx+�„^^^L ., r ��.�Y1i f. �. �, \ .. a 0!Y A �I e r .. aa •/ • • • • • • • • • • r • I \ i I � r , 1 • • , 1 M , Architects Atelier/Northwest Transmittal ••. r�axa>:MUxe"t.a9rcrvinnearaxauarxdr+asses+.aywwrtucvM:ru+nrt«erm+r.�axaaw,ICUt�Ww.wwkkGaa•.satttux'+a�i't7me�pa+rrmrtx+wan�'=>'Iwrn'-�'+++ruu ax.�a:c::'„a ':;e�+r:.kW .vu;`u.'-ar�Y..'ca*xr,C'ks!.;u�—a+✓'�c„stiunyra'.:'>cautruscsxtz%.atxttxst:xzulxk'�rc>„'ut#x- _.. .� _- uxtepsu;�..AMA..egq+r��::+anrRln+n%rnrotN�4*!•, 1 1 , 813 Southwest Alder Street Portland Oregon 97205 / 503 227-3176 Date June 23, 1978 Project Number 77 — 16A To Nancy Chase Project Park 217 Business Center City of Tigard ) � 12420 SW Main Street • jj Tigard, Oregon 97223 Distribution • We are sending the following material herein (f gy messenger 0 Under separate cover 0 , 1 Number Set sheet or of c..)pies Description of item document no Dated Action requested 1 Design Review Application • 1 Check for $450.00 , Preliminary Design Review StibmiSsiont �.n 3 Project Narrative 3 sets Project Drawings ,. • • • 1t h • • I Sent by Pemarl<s • Our me$sengor • (] Your messenger • 0 Mail � • © N;press' CD II 8y Donald J. Sta8t y SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN'AND DESIGN REVIEW, Site Plan Review File No. ' 3r: Architectural Review Fee Received $ r- APPLICATION Receipt # Tigard Planning Department Date Fie -i ed �- ��' 12420 SW Main Street, Tigard, Or. 97223 By ' QA)MAL; (", 639-4171 Project Title Park 217 Business Center Date Filed June 23 1978 Project Address 12140 S.W. Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon Tax Map No. 2S1 1BB Tax Lot No 200, 300, 800, 1100, •1101, 1200 Developer's Name Western Racquet Clubs, Inc. Y Address 85 S.W. Beaverton Hillsdale Highway, Portland, Oregon 97225 • Telephone 297-3723 Owner's Name Same as developer Address Same as developer Telephone Same as de .per Owner-'s Signatur .. Ronald E. Gomez, President Description of Proposed Use ommerci a /Industrial Planned Development DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Fora«used Use . . Buildings � Units �« Ft Uri n • Commercial Office Recreation Facilities 1 N.A.: 131,520 . . s:f- Indlistrial N.A. 115, 200 g.s:f. Site size 20.132 acres Tot. S . Ft. of Buildings 246,720 sa. Ft. of Paving 248'539 g.8-f. sq. Ft. of Landscaping 443,979 gw s,f i Anticipated Development Date 1978 � 19 Be E'all Anticipated Development Phases Two Phases . Valuation Million ($4 Million each p hase) 'Estimate ' Y• ) . J 't.I:A'.:..._.,.:.. a.'_..':..' '.:,,.:..�.�:.:.... r.:.- '� .,......,i... lw.N,w.rw,._ .if....4.1rv-•f..l-.......l.:.I.H..�.^.. ..r.. nn.r rA•F.I 4 a1....h.1.N � ' ,. .'� »..:'.:. .., ..v.c F..al.:u.'M'.-.S✓ d'....' i.i i-..„n S.rl...a....✓.Wes.,Ix.L,r .. ,�' ... 1 :.r:-.-t.l"41.: F•H q ± .. ..,..r w ..ate.v.-_ �,.,..r Applicant waives Section 18. 59 020 Administration of the p. `Tigard Municipal Code (a) Action. Within thirty days of receipt of design plans in conformance with all aspects of this code, the planning director or his agent shall approve, disapprove, or approve with conditions all design review plans required by this chapter, except as may be otherwise provided under Section 18 . 59. 040. r I . IG, • S, M78 • DAP , • t 1` • • • I i � r r I I f r • I I I � f �stgyr�Cra t,1 r w , +Q'/ 1 � • • • 1. II r r..u..rrr.xy.....x.w r...vMUr..nnr.n.n+.x.Mr..v.e�.u•ramnxrx.rvnv.ar..n x..rwn.an..:.vrrw.rrur•u r�n'rrv.:,..,,,'r...:-• .,r•i.,.. ,•1,.'.1 : : .,v�,x..":, ;',.ai,:• .,r..:,�.. .,,r..r..i rx N.•.... ».� n^ �., ,.r. �...,. ,n e. . it r r ._ 4 . • • ;,MINUTES „ 'IIGARD PLANNING COMMIS ' J u n:e_ �20, 1978 . , Fourier, Junior High School - Lecture Room 10865 SW Walnut .. Tigard, Oregon, • 1. Calf to Order: ,Meeting was called to order at 7:30 PM 2. Roll Call: 4. Present: Wood, Corliss, Quimby, Brian, Rossman, Sakata Excused Absence: Tepedino, Popp 3. Approval of Minutes The minutes of the June 6,, 1978 and June 13, 1978 meeting were approved: 1' 4. Communications: None 5. Public Hearings: 5.1 ZONE CHANGE ZC 36-77 (Western Racquet Club) NPO' 5 A request by Western Racquet Club for a general plan and program review for a Commercial Industrial Planned Development in a M-;, Light Industrial and C-3 General Commercial Zone of parcels totalling 20.75 acres at SW Garden Place and Pacific Hwy(Wash. Co. Tax Map 251 1BB, Tax Lots 200, 300, 800, 1100, 1101, 1200) . , A. Staff Report Res.•d. by Laws • B. Applicant's Presentation Ron Moore, Co-Applicant for the project stated the entire team which had worked on the project was present. Don Stassney, Architect, 813 S.W. Alder, presented a slide show and explained all phases of the proposed development. • C. Public Testimony: None D. Staff l tecomrendatiron Based on Findings of Fact and Conclusionary Findings staff recommends approval of the general plan and program subject to the following conditions: 1. That all buildings, building locations, landscaping,' pedestrians ',cess vehicut r &access to parking area.s(to include driveway widths) and s• giro„; be subject it) design review. 1 � 2 That a dedicated street, built to commercial street standards with 36 feet of pavement, 5 foot sidewalks on one side of the street' (location ° of sidewalks to be determined during design review) be provided through the property from Hall Blvd. to Pacific Highway va Garden Place and that the applicant petition to the City 'Council to vacate the remaining portion' , of S.W. Garden Place 3. That a left turn refuge land, to include striping be provieled along the ;fall' Blvd. frontage and that a;half 'street improvement (to .'include curbs and sidewalks) also be provided along the Hall Blvd. frontage. Ali m , , . (• . °gip 0 , TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION • June 20, 17 8 ' • Page 2 provernents to be subject to State Highway Department approval, ' .4. That no parking be allowed along Hall Blvd. from Pacific Hwy to . S.W. Knoll Drive. This will require a no parking ordinance via City Council action. 5. That no left turns occur from Garden Place into the westbound Pacific 4 Hwy traffic and that approach street improvements to Garden Place from Pacific Hwy be provided per State Highway Dept. requirements. ti‘I �`ri •..ebut;talo . ' • • Don Stassney, stated they would have a problem with Staff Rec. #E2 and 1 the width of the street with the parking backing into the right of way. Laws asked what would be the net loss of parking spar.,es if they were removed. Stassney stated 15 spaces. i '� � • , Bob Gardiner, Landscape Architect, stated they had tried to keep the cars { from parking directly in front of the buildings. , Wood asked about the safety implications and what if the street became a shortcut. . Stassney stated the road now proposed was 30' . Quimby asked if the fire marshall had been contacted. , • Buttke, Consulting Engineer for the project) stated they wouldn' t be high volume streets. Corliss asked what sort of material the buildings would be constructed of. Stassney responded board form tilt up of pre-cast concrete with tin roofs; `•xt the materials would be consistent throughout thepro ject. proposed street \ Sakata asked if the property owners had been. notif ied about the —, • Laws stated they..had been :aotified of the .meeting: vacation. E. Commission Discussion: Brian was concerned with the traffic flow; with the truck and hours of 't,,,, ' . operation. ' . Buttke referred to the traffic study he had done which was in the book each commissioner had. Brian stated the 72nd interchange was not yet firm and asked if they could , restrict t trucks on Hail Buttke stated there were other industries on Hall requiring truck access; there would be very,very few trucks during peak hours. ' Qummby asked if the fire marshall had approved this plan for emergency access. Laws stated they had reviewed it and had made rto comment. " Sakata wanted the fire department to approve of the plan; felt two outboUnd4lan 4 4 r needed. ,°4f:k w u _ 1 .Bu ttke s tator with these vo1 umus it would only ;equi :e one, lane. 't: r.i " Rossman felt staff had done an :exceptional job and was in favor of the staff ,' ' recommendations . . ,'XIV' Corliss stated it was a fine plan: good questioned the parking problem on Hall;wanted the fire department approval; i agreed that three exits would provide sufficient/egress; asked if the parking stalls were 9 -.1 wide; asked if the safe1 ty/aesthet i c trade-off would d justify • more parking; would it be financially feasible to add 50% water retention: David Evans, responded it would be fessible to add the water retention with the roof top storage. Brian was concerned with th e history of fill on the site. ,` • r. ti p MINUTES ' 1,. TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSiuN ',r, June 20, 1978 Page 3 • encroachment in the flood plain took place prior to the ' Laws stated -adoption of the flood plain ordinance. , Rossman made a motion for approval based on staff recommendations; �" '. • Brian seconded. , ' Jood added tw o a ddi tional conditions; 1), fire department approve all road widths and turns 2) the water retention. be inc re r ed by 50`/0 Sakata asked about making the parking stalls 92' Laws stated the additional cars could be scattered throughout the site as compact spaces; this would be answered during design review. The motion was unanimously passed. 5.3 ZONE CHANGE ZC 15-78 . (Der - Hart Associates) NPO 5 I ,. A request by Der -Hart Associates for a Preliminary Plan and Program Rteviel•, of ..7 a Residential Planned, Development and 'Zone Map Amendment from R-7 to R-7 PD, for a 15.47 acre parcel at 14070 SW Hall Blvd (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 12B, Tax Lots 600, 800, 1100, 1101). . • A. Staff Report: Read by Laws. B. Applicant's Presentation: Bill Svendsen, 1544 S.W. Hawthorne, Portland, stated he agreed with the {' staff report and addressed himself to the 3 points under Staff Rec. 07 !' and clarified that there would not actually be 80' of asphalt but would ` be broken up with landscaping and street trees. He agreed to the points required in the letter from Joe Greulich, Fire Marshall. ;, . C. Public Testimony: None, f. • I: , D. Staff Recommendation: . • Staff recommends 'pproval of the preliminary plan and program with the following conditions. 1. That the points of concern raised in findings of facl:.A B aid C ..r,, be addressed in the general plan and program 1%r.T.1 submitted. 2. In addition, the concerns raised by the Fir : A,,,;,_"; ;,hall in his attached ; • correspondenan should also be addressed. E. Commission Discuss&oin and Action: ;! ,, Rossman was.,.4iGI, favor, of the proposal. I� pp F ' ng the proposal; lot size q . t ' 44- '� Sakata strongly opposed asdi � the ze at x:850 s � f . F ' was too small., there was no play area.for the duplex lots. �,Ir� �'�' ' ° \' 44 Quimby agr�'.r ci with Stil�a ta, • F �n0t'sd ;4 'I7 Wood s tratedi the street �aesi n would invite t't� uble withee er enc ; 7 , {r4/ the lots arrangements was an obvious attempt 'to maximize. y_ , Corliss asked the applicant about the lot. sl zee ;i `'`' • • Svendsen pointed out the lot sizes, the density was 8 units/acre which was !; in conformity with the Bonita plan to provide a range of living alternatives. Corliss stated it was in conformance with the plan. Jeff I-Iartley Der-Hart Associates, stated lots of time and care has been put , into this proposal; it was a beautiful Site and they had attempted to preserve much of is as well as provide different types and styles of homes; they met . I i'" I Y a . MINUTES . TIGARD PLANNING COMMISL., .)N June 20, 1978 : . . Page 4 the code requirements; as the construction of the duplex lots was four years . away it was impossible to estimate the,costs. Brian stated 8 units per useable acres would be better to figure density; . asked what was the best way to proceed with this proposal which- everyone obviously had problems with. Wood stated the childrens recreation center was too far away from the duplex area; the density was okay considering the amount of, open space; the fire marshall should definitely approve it; .b Quimby made a motion for denial based on the lot size; Failure to attain . r fire department approval; road system problems. Sakata seconded. Wood asked if they could give direction to the applicant. The motion failed with a 4-2 vote; Quimby and Sakata Voted yes'. ' Brian made a motion for approval based on staff recommendations and with two additional co_':ditions 3) no lot be less than 3500 sq. ft. and 4)the recreation area be relocated to be more accessible. • Corliss seconded and asked if it was fair to tie the developers down at this time ; there was no designation of 3500 sq. ft. anywhere else, • Brian stated it would, be best to do now. Laws stated it was an arbitrary lot size and the NPO had never decided 1 on a minimum lot size. r r Wood stated they would be under separate' parcel.. ocn�.e'rship Brian withdrew 1-4is motion. , Wood made a motion for approval with the additions 3) the childrens recreation .' area be more appropriavely located; L )the developer site the attached units to provide a better ratio of green area to asphalt. Corliss seconded. �.:• Brian disapproved of the motion. Corliss stated everyone had a right to decent housing; 10,000 sq.ft, lots are nice but if someone wanted to live on a small lot they should be allowed to do so. ' 6:14.41/4.,),.„ was a minimum lot s Sakata asked if there waini lize in Tigard. '` 1,- Laws stated NPO 5 created higher densities; they would have to stay within ,,, i, the parameters of that plan. • 1,7,,,,,;, � The vote on the motion was tied.ltossman Corliss ..y Quimby,Brian Sakata,no '' ) ,Wood eu• ,; ,°`A',V', , Brian stated'the density here was not what the NPO wanted. ' Wood moved approval based on staff recommendations with the following , - additional conditions 3) the childrens recration area be more appropriately . located 4) the minimum lot size be 3,000 sq, ft. . Hartley stated many buyers would be eliminateu with a 3,000 sq. ft. minimum. 1 • . Svendsen stated the 8 units/acre was based on useable land. to Wood asked who they would hurt with the increased density. Sakata stated they would be setting a precedent„ t.�'I 'r`F1 Wood w tlldr.ew hiS x{�A�;,° motion; stated the more basic concern wa.s wheth:ea' or not'~ 1,4,, • y t 1^� Y r K ll.�x}4ti Lo allow houses" `" 7 + 1 o! P j[ tit 4 �y 4r r G1l:a�,'.� 011 this ii(�`G�..I,1. or lob, I dr Y�`1°.�.�[ir ♦i,�,P "1��t ��! }ff t'a,Y aY ,•I' Quimby asked tho L Ulu NPO 5 i oup be con'tac tea. , , 1_,:,,,,,, ,14," ,' pa` ' . " Wood asked that they leave the lot size an open question and made a motion ,:'p. „ ,'" for approval based on staff recomenclations with I th,s following additional ` '`''" • conditions 3) the relocation of the chi drehs recreation area to ''a more :°�♦ appropriate place 4) the commission has not(approved property` lot sizes for attached units and de sires the input of the NPO before making a final • decision. Gorliss seconded. r 1 + • a 1 motion ., The n T ot o passed 4 to 2, Sakata and��, Qtt�mby voted no, . ♦ I ..•..w.......w..+..w...«w.... �.�...............w,.,.nn.. ..•.n,. .,,w,.a... ...s... ... .... ... •..... ,,,,.,,,,,. ..i.,, ..,i,.. •. i„ .-,. •.. ,._.,i .. 1 . _ ,. .. ..,,. ... . ,.,..... .... •. R y ,r MINUTES 'l' • TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION June 20, 1978 Page 5 .~ • 5.4 CONDITIOINAL USE CU 15•-.78 (Western Oregon Marine) NPO. 4 • A request by Western Oregon Marine for, a Conditional Use Permit to operate a retail boat sales and repair business and outsde storage in 'a C• 3' General • Commercial zone for a 3.51 acre parcel at 11552 SW Pacific Hwy (Wash. Co. Tax Map 181 36DA, Tax Lot 900) '..situ;,,1,,t., A. Staff Report Read by Laws. ' ' B. Applicant's Presentation: . r Terry Houck , Attorney for Western Oregon Marine, stated they needed , a place to move after the fire; many other businesses were anxious to move into this site but this would_be the best use without much traffic. ' . ? C. Public Testimony: None . • D. Staff Recommendation: , Staff recommends approval of the conditional use request subject to the following condition: • 1. That a site plan (to include landscaping, parking, architectural improvemer'9. • to the office/shop building and signing program) be submitted to design )1 review for approval. E. Commission Discussion Sakata asked if both lots on Mai.a Street were gone. ' Houghton answered only one. • Brian stated this would be a low traffic. generator. • Wood moved for approval, based on staff recommendations, ,-- J Corlis.s seconded, S. .i. Vote was unanimous. ' ,' 5.5 VARIANCE V 5-78 (Western Oregon Marine) NPO 4 ' A request by Western Oregon Mari:ae for a variance to the Tigard Municipal • , Code (off-street parking and loading) requirements in a C-3 General Commercial • zone for a 3.51 acre parcel at 11552 5W Pacific Hwy (Wash. Co Tax Map 1S1 36DA, Tax tot 900) . .,,,,,,,, I,.,..' • � r� on �atF��t1µ'�;, Y 1 MH Vitt44 t tats s A a ,� l�. c tiff 'C'�e,port Rc�ai1 by taw �,.«4r41:4 �,';� �i' �' r t .,44 � it d' i3 Applicant's Presontataon: r.,„ ,..,t, .- r „ wt 4.,,,,', 1 '�,,I��i+ 1 n �'.x. Terry Houc .c , Attorney for Western Oregon; Marine, stated the plateau on "."4 ,1'' the lower level of the property would not be used; they were requesting mg ,� postponement paving so they would be able to move it stpanetnent of t avxi� be into the site a�1 soon as Santry ,race.ted , Mr. Reed, Nift,stetn Oregon Marine, stated the fire vas costly ajri„d all their parts had been ,burned and it would be a financial impossibility for them. • r to pave the site a this time Wood asked when. they would move in? P' n „ t I • • T MINUTES ., 1,,` 1 ' TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION June 20, 1.97x3 Page 6 Reed stated soo n as S antry moved out. '''$ Brian asked if Design Review would not take care of it and did staff have a position on deferred development? Wood stated it would not be .design review. Laws stated staff was concerned with the administrative enforcement of . the limitation period. . Sakata asked about a bond. F ; '• i Wood stated tad �� would be a violation of the city code if they failed to comply, , s Wood made a Notion for approval with the variance expiring May 31, 1979. • Quimby seconded. ' The vote was unanimous. 6. 0`l.SHER BUSINESS: Quimby could see no reason why Sakata, Tepedino and Popp would need another ' . • , interview to retain their positions. Wood stated the Planning Commission was confident the members of City Council were informed of the perForrnance of the Planning Commission members and C , ' recommended additional interviews not be required with respect to the re- ' ;) appointment of existing members of the Planning Commission; existing members t . should stand on their past performance. Corl.iss asked why they would not want to go for inteiviews> " Quimby stated if they were not looked at favorably by the City Council they would not be reappointed'anyway, . '44\' Sakata stated they could use the minutes of past Commission meeting to snake a ,, ,• decision. ' Wood recommended it was not necessary. ' • • • Quimby stated personalities should not enter into the decisions Sakata stated it was turning into a politic l 'decision'. , , ,ti. Wood suggested the Commissioners submit a formal recommendation to Counc _l • Corliss stated they should interview 4 ` 'n � retai. their � I L �. like commissioners in .question sere needed on the Commission h y go the 'to retain r st ";U' • Wood proposed a letter be sent to the City � C ilmem...ber s encouraging ' them to consider t he question of 'eta� it g continuity o n the , j • Commission - whil recognizing responbibility ty to.decide on Commissioners appointments . while r n�.zin their res on.c a Co and not seeking to interfere in any w 1y with their right to do so. The commission unanimously agreed with Woods propos=al. " . 7. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 11:00 P: :' �p L i ,).a en„,,aF+i ,It r+g9''i . 1(J!'eA, 4y44'dd " .'",.'01+", \!r Y,.*5't x55 vt Mr $ Yf r1 ��,p _ d1' .I .., y'tt'R�t"1-..,10e4,1 7 r YM Y. r 'Sift W,,.4,J.,'k"44te ,tY 1 e '4,;) " .4. , i I r w , • Q, �I , - '4 STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5 . 1 Tigard Planning Commission June 20, 1978 • Fowler Junior High - Lecture Room 10865 S .W. Walnut St . - Tigard, Oregon • • Docket : Zone Change ZC 36-77 • • Reouest : For a general plan and program review for a Commercial/ Industrial Planned Development in a C-3 "General Commercial" . •• and M-3 "Light Industrial" zones of parcels totalling 20 . 135 a , acres. . , # Location : Southwest Garden Place and Pacific Highway between Hall Blvd. and Highway 217 (Wash. Co . Tax Map 2S1 1BB, Tax Lots 200, 300, 800, 1100 , 1101 and 1200) . 4 Applicant : Western Racquet Clubs , Inc. • I . Findings of Fact : 1 . The site is designated "Retail Commercial" in the northern portion of the site and "light industrial" in the southern portion on the NPO #5 Plan and currently zoned C-3 Retail Commercial and M-3 Light Industrial . • 2 . The applicant is requesting general plan and program review ' - of a two pha-se commercial/commercial professional/industrial planned development on parcels totalling 20.135 acres in ! accordance with Section 18. 56 . 030 of the Tigard Municipal Code. 3. Section 18 .56 . 010 of the Tigard Municipal Code states that Purpose. The purpose of the planned development district is to provide opportunities to create more desirable environments through the application of flexible and diversified land development standards under a comprehensive plan and program professionally prepared1 The planned development district is intended to be used to encourage the application of new techniques and new technology to community development which . . will result in superior living or development arrangements , with lasting values . It is further iiltended to achieve economies in land. development) maintenance, street systems, • and utility networks while providing building groupings for • privacy, usable and attractive open spaces, safe circulation, ad w41-h(iing of the inhabitants . \,,_ 4, Applicable policies from the NPO 5 Plan are as follows : • Policy fn the interest of safety and efficiency, the number of highway access points must be kept to a minimum, Wherever possible, businesses on Pacific - , . • N 4. t. ' STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5. 1 June 20, 1978 Page Highway should be clustered and s'itare common sparking facilities and driveways'. as new development occurs, the number of access points should not exceed the f number necessary for proper on-site traffic circulation and, where possible, should be combined with access to adjacent businesses . Policy 25: I imi t the amount of commercial development to occur in the industrial area, allowing only some growth of existing retail and service commercial in the area. '. 5. Applicable policies from the Environmental Design and Open Space Plan: ry Policy 3: The City shall restrict alteration of natural drainageways unless it can be demonstrated that the benefits are greater than the detrimental effects. Other jurisdictions in the Fanno Creek Basin shall be , encouraged to do the same Policy 5: The City shall adopt an ordinance to regulate the removal and/or replacement of existing natural vegetation in designated areas (flood plains, drainageways, areas or high visibility, unique habitats or rare species) . • Significant trees or stands of timber shall also be ° ' protected. ; ' Policy 6: Require a site development report (e. g. , hydrology, ! • soils, geology) for major projects in designated areas and a statement reflecting methods to be used to minimize the run-off erosion impact of .the development on the surrounding area and downstream properties: Policy 7: Retain the ZOO year flood plain of Panno Creek, its tributaries, and the Tualatin River as an open preserve (Greenway) . The greenway shall be esta fished as the , backbone of the open space network and when a direct '' public benefit can be derived, jig , then adjacent I -' resident al development; the greenway, should be developed for passive recreation .Ind pedestrian/bikerdveZ: 6 . On November 1 , 1977 the Tigard' Planning Commission approved a preliminary plan and program for, this s ite subject to the following conditions : • 1 . That rol imi!aa..... approval only be given o the general cbn- y�y /, ,��++ ,the �y�,� ,� �, n t cep t o.,4; the PD c , ' 2. That approval of location and intensity of use must await • submis ion of more detailed plans to include traffic and flood plain studies e r y ' 0 STAFF REPORT / AGENDA 5. 1 u : June 20, 1978, Page ; . 3. The applicant must be prepared to show that , by encroaching into the flood plain , the fill will neither to decrease the amount of storage capacity nor increase the run-off from the site 4 . A flood plain films permit application ication be submitt ed . 5. A minor land partition application be made for Tax Lot " 400 (Tax Map 2S1 113B) . . • A: 6. That a drainage plan be submitted for approval (to pay , particular attention to' the effect on adjacent sites) . II . Staff Observations and Findings : 1 . The proposed development is being planned in, two phases . The m; first phase will consist of ground preparation and the construction of 69,232 square feet of commercial office and recreation facilities . Phase II will be the construction of .a light industrial complex consisting of eight (8) buildings " totalling 115,200 square feet of gross floor area. p. ' 2. The site slopes from the north to the south, dropping from approximately 210 feet MSL at Pacific Highway to 150 feet , MST, at the south property line . Co ` .. �- � p p y l Considerable earth fill � has taken place on the upper portion cf the site, resulting in a tier effect . The applicant envisions locating the commercial offices and recreation facility on the newly created fills . The southern portion of the site is relatively flat and contains a pond. Red Rock Creek, which flows out of the . northeast and passes under Highway 217 , continues through! the sou: least portion of the parcel and serves as the primary i source of Water for the pond. Crystal Lake, which was ' ' . formerly in the southeastern corner of the site, has been, graded over . 0 3, The site is surrounded on the east by HighWay 217; to the south by industrial development and single family residential (southwest) ; to the West and acr.)ss Hall ,Boulevard are apartments; and to the north retail stores, a service station, and Pacific Highway. i 4. The applicant has sseritially incorporated into his general plan and program the conditions of preliminary approval • Based on the revised site plan , conditions 3, 4 and 5 have . become moot points for the following reasons: a, Although a portion of the site does fall with the °100 year flood plain (note`, new elevations i for the 100 year flood plain have been recently� calculated by the U.S. Army Corp .' of Eng nee i s as of April 1 978) no building encroachment . is being 'proposed within' the flood plain and subsequently .. there would not be a need for a flood plain fill perm_it. , II .,'u,r...n nn „•.u.i.,..a,.e4...,w,u,.,w.w..ryu.,.i...w.ui.i+_.....r_r...,...t_,na. i,_ ..,.✓..,., a.,, ,.. ....,... ... _,. ....v,w M...,. r,.,n. ., n i.,t u. . . ,„ , ,' 1. ^ , I . " .....r....�/•nm..4 g n •< , . 1 • • A r STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5. 1 . •, June 20 , 1375 Page 4 b. Tax 400 which ,vas proposed serve as an overflow�b Lot 0 0 osed to �sEr e s�� o �,er Floti p P v parking lot for the recreational and commercial areas has been eliminated as part of the total project area and the parking demands for these uses are to be accDmmodate. on the remaining portion of the site as submitted in .. . the general site plan • 5. The revised site plan reflects a change in both the building diYnensions and location of the commercial (recreational • facilities) and commercial professional offices . The applicant has grouped the recreational facilities. and profession offices by "stacking" the, office space (thrc e stories) on toy , of the recreational facilities (racquetball and tennis courts) . The result is a net increase of, 8220 square feet in office space but a reduction of 20, 600 square feet of recreation ' . area for a total reduction of 12, 380 square feet in building ' , area. The industrial buildings proposed in Phase II are the same in ° number (eight) proposed on the preliminary plan, but have ` been clustered and serviced with a loop driveway. : No . t encroachment into the flood plain would result based on the ' building locations as submitted . • C A traffic impact study for the site has been conducted by Carl Bait tke, P.E. Consulting Engineer and reviewed by the State Highway Department. Mr. Buttke ' s conclusions were the following: a. A left turn refuge on Hall Blvd. should be provided (this would require no parking on one side of the street) and 'a restriping of Hai Blvd. The state concurs with Mr. Buttke 's recommendation but feel no parking should be provided on both sides of Hall Blvd: from Pacific Highway to Knoll Street b . That left turns be prohibited from Garden Place to the westbound Pacific Highway traffic. c. Th at when Phase 11 is developed a third acce ss be 'provded from southeastern corner of the parcel onto Hunzike r Str u , An access agreemeri i; between the subject ect parcel and x J P the ( 4 ��11rY7].l�eg parcels to the access/egress onto he s��i�.h for acce r Street is recorded With the deeds of those parcels , The agreement provides for a 60 foot easement that would be dedicated for street right-of-way purposes at such time as it is deemed necessary by the County or City . A portion of this easement between the Tigard i' . Distribution Center and Partex has been paved but is without .o w� 4 curbs and sidewalks, Y 1 ■ / ( . ' • , S��AF �� REPORT ;% AGENDA 5. 1 i June 20, 1075 I Page 5 • 7. The applicant is proposing that Garden Place from Pacific a Highway to the south end of the recreational facilities . remain as a dedicated right-of-way. But that the remaining 1 . portion of S .W. Garden Place be vacated and access from Hall Blvd. and Hunziker Street servicing the industrial properties i be developed on easements. ; 4. The Engineering Department has reviewed this proposal and ' made the following excepiton to the applicant 's proposal : That a dedicated public street be .developed to commercial ' ;' street standards ( this could be 36 :feet of pavement and a , sidewalk on one side of the street) from the Hall Blvd. F access along the north property line to the Pacific Hwy. , access access/egress (via. Garden Place) . This way there would be a continuous public street provided for access to , ' the recreation facilities and commercial professional offices. y S. Code Deviat ions : ' • The required total parking spaces for all uses in the develop- ment would be 316 . The applicant is providing for 310. Since peak hours of the proposed uses do not coincide with , each other a ✓shared parking arrangement is being proposed. k The applicant has stated ''that the total amount of spaces is reduced but more efficiently ,.rbiiized over the hours of • a day" . Access to the parking lots are proposed to narrow to 20 feet . ' • . Code requirement is 30 feet with 24 foot pavement surfac;.„g. . The height of the combined office and recreation area will be c• five stories, but less than 75 feet Height maximum in a C-3 zone are 3 stories or 35 feet which ever is less . . ' '' . However t the Planning Commission can grant approval for , . . structures up to a heights of 75 feet , The impacts of a building of this height on surrounding land; r , uses should be negligible , in that the topography is such that the main exposure this complex will have will occur along only the Highway 21.7 frontage: 'j . ,k.; „..;. . A , A methodugy for prov t.c.ling storm water detention has been 'I' ' submitted with the applicant ' s narrative p 'ogram. 10 . Fifty percent of the site is to be open space and 'landscaping, ” the light industrial buildings will cover 13% of the siteL and the recreation and office building 8%, The remaining 20 of the site will be used for streets , roads, parking and trupk* I service areas _....W.._...w .. W....u..�w. . .....e.. w. w « .i • ^p . a.wv 1 u T ' 4 • • 1 • 1 I I ..I ,.... ,x......,.»•..., r,,......_... ........... ....rE.,.•, _..w..r- .........!. J:_._.,1, ,,,«........ruu. ..slw:.,, -k r.,.q 1 ' STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5. June 20, 1978 Page h III . bonclusionary 'Findings : 1 . The general plan submission has incorporated the objectives, of ' the planned development •district by providing for grouping of buildings intermix with "usable and attractive" open space , while providing for a traffic circulation pattern designed to move efficiently and sagely both vehicular and pedestrian traffic, 2. There will be no enroachment into the 100 year flood ,lain. 3: Access has been provided onto Hunziker Street for the industrial traffic an tie ipated to be generated by this development . This third access/egress will help to lessen the traffic impacts on Hall Blvd. and Pacific IHighway. However, staff concurs with the Engineering Department that 1 a dedicated public right-of-way should exist'I through the • site from H-lall Blvd. to Pacific Highway . Iv. Staff Recommendations : Based on Findings of fact and conclusionary findings staff recommends approval of the general plan and program subject to the following conditions 1 . That all buildings, building locations , landscaping, pedestrian access, vehicular access to parking areas (to include driveway widths) and signing be subject to design review: A 2. That a dedicated street , built to commercial street standards p • with 36 feet of pavement , 5 foot sidewalks on one side of . the street (location of sidewalks to be determined during design review) be provided through the property from Hall Blvd. to ' Pacific Highway via Grden. Place and that the applicant petition to the City council to vacate the remaining portion of S .W. Garden place, 3. That a left turn refuge lane, to include striping be provided along the Hall Blvd, frontage and that a half street improvement ( to include curbs and sidewalks) also be provided along the Hall Blvd. frontage. All improvements to be subject to State Highway Department approval. . • 41 That no parking be allowed along tall Blvd: from pacific. . `. Highway to S .W s Knoll Drive , This will :`ec u r cl a no parking ordinance via City Council action 5. That n o left tut,qns occur from Garden rc en Place into the westbound, Pacific Highway traffic and that approach street improvements to Garden Place from Pacific Highway be provided per State Highway Department requirements, MINUTES TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION November 1, 1977 Page 4 D. Staff Recommendation Based on findings of fact and gonclusionary findings, staff recommends approval with the following conditions: 1. File le with the city recorder an agreement not to re- s monstrate against a Local Improvement District for street improvements to S .W. 121st Avenue. n 0 2. Five foot dedication o�. right--of--way be provided' along the S.W. 121st Avenue frontage. E. Commission Discussion : o Popp questioned the validity of the conditions since no actual development was being requested. Brian moved and Moore seconded for approval based on staff findings and with staff recommendations. The motion a- approved by unanimous voice vote 5.4 zone Change 7C 36-77 (Ron More, Western Racquet Club) A request by Ron More of Western Racquet CJ.u1,, for a prelimi- nary plan and program review of an industrial planned devel- / opment in a M-3, Light Industrial, and C-3, General Comxner- /, vial, zone of parcels totalling 20. 75 acres at Garden Place ' and S.W. Pacific Highway (Wash. Co. Tax ' g Y ( x Map 2Sl 1BB, Tax Lots 200, 300, 800, 1100 , 1101, 1200, and the southern pore „I Lion of Tax Lot 400) A. Staff Report: Read by Laws bl B. Applicant's Presentation: , Roh More, applicant, introduced the architect for the project. Don Stastny narrated a slide presentation, ' e plained the project, outlined the different activities M and the flood plain treatment area. He stressed that preliminary planned development approval a was for '' concept only, not for a specific plan. Stastny agreed that the I-unziker Street access would be investigated and that a traffic study y would be done. , w r +,� r . a i kr MINUTES TIGARD PLANNING, COMMISSION , i. November 1, 1977 " ' Page 5 o Rich Henney, sales engineer, stated the applicant's Q intent to establish the flood plain and correct fill � . r problems. o Don Puderbaugh addressed the storm drainage problems . and stated that an accurate topographical map would � ^ be prepared. o Stastny reviewed the program elements and rtucommended that the Commission grant approval of the concept and .. use and that if approved, the applicant had every intention of finding solutions for the problems dis- cussed. C. Public Testimony: • o Ann Craig expressed concern over the vacation of S.W. Garden Place and traffic problems. • ru o Wayne Shepherd stated that hazardous conditions al- ready existed on S.W. Hall Boulevard, and this devel- opment would further intensify the problem. n. Staff Recommendation: Based upon the p proposal to develop in the flood plain, unresolved access problems and specific deficiencies in the site development plan, staff recommends denial. If the Commission elects to table this proposal, staff recommends that the applicant be required to submit the following: 1. A flood plain fill permit application 2. An analysis of the traffic impacts on adjacent streets, ♦including consideration of eliminating ac- cess to Pacific Highway and utilizing Rail Boulevard and Hunziker Street for this purpose. 3. A site plan associating the recreation facility with the natural environmental features located in the southern portion of the site. If the Commission elects to approve the preliminary plan and program, st aa ft r ecommends that the a ppl i` rant be re-- quired to provide the following information and that • • I I h .. r r r 1 r • ' • • {(, MINUTES TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION November 1, 1977 Page 6 certain alterations be made to the applicant's general plan and program when submitted for final consideration: 1, A flood plain fill permit application be submitted 2. The site plan be revised to provide access from the F southeast corner of the site to Hunziker Street and that access be restricted to Hall Boulevard and .Hun w . ziker Street. �. 3. Proposed street construction standards be submitted ° for S.W. Garden Place (to include the proposed ex- • tension of Garden Place to Hall Boulevard) 4. That a petition for the vacation of those portions of S.W. Garden Place as proposed by the developer • be submitted to the city recorder. II 5. A minor land partition application be made for Tax •\1 - tot 400 (Tax Map 2S1 1BB) 6. That a drainage plan be submitted for approval (to • pay particular attention to the effect on adjacent sites) . o Ron More stated that Mr. Buttke would be retained to solve the traffic problem and that the proposed uses would be the most acceptable for the city. • E. Commission Discussion: o Tepedino cross--examined the applicant, Ron More, and the owner, Dick Lucke, concerning fill in the flood plain. o pick Lucke explained that the original filling had I It been done by the State Highway Department and that , the fill had been made in about 1963. o Wood received I•terbal assurance from Evans, the hy- draulic engineer, that the original flood plain 'ca� pacity would be restored and addressed the 17.4ppropri- ateness of the street vacation and possible traffic problems , o Tepedino stated hat past policy had been to prove • the need for flood °plain fill before, allowing is I , tt • _»,-+w....,ewe...,..,mw..,m.,......:..,,.,w.+a.x.,u..ra+l..ww..•.,w.u„v.wu.,. „n,••„w.i,,.w.,..,...wN.wA.•.... ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,...,o.d<..,,,.,....,.'n.,,,.�,,..,•.,a. i, ,.0 ....,•,.c.e.,...o-r.,,�yp �y� 1 1, .r I. • I ( \ i as ; o MINUTES TIGARD, PLANNING COMMISSION November 1, 1977 Page ? preliminary approval of a planned development and ex- pressed concern over the impact of this development. o. Brian suggested that the matter be tabled until suf- ficient ro } information was received. 0 Tepedino reiterated that the burden of proof rested with the applicant. • o Evans stated that they intended to solve all these problems if they could be given assurance that the uses were desirable by a preliminary approval. o Popp summarized the points of concern. • Goldbach moved and. Tepedino seconded that the proposal be tabled until the applicant could satisfy the flood plain criteria (hydraulogist report on retention and dispersal of water) and submit traffic analysis, and a site plan negating the impacts. o Wood stated he opposed tabling because of interpre- t ° tation of preliminary planned development approval and that tabling involved unnecessary hearings, • . The motion failed in a three to five vote, with Popp, Corliss, Wood, Moore, and Brian dissenting. • Wood moved and Moore seconded for preliminary approval to be given: 1. Only to the general concept of the PD f . 2. That approval of location and intensity of use must await submission of more detailed plans to include traffic and flood plain studies 3. The applicant must be prepared to show that, by en- , - croachinlg into the flood plain, the fill' will neither decrease the amount of storage capacity nor increase . the run-off from the site And. all conditions not met by the above on " � �iL � staff Conditiori et y above ao di- t i ons o More suggested moving the office complex and :recom mended locating the recreational facilities closer to the open space area • o • 4 MINUTES TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION November 1, 1977 Page 8 The motion was approved in a five to three vote, Tepe-- di no, Sakata, and Goldbach. dissenting. 5. 5 Conditional Use CU 31-77 (Tigard High School ) A request by School District No. 23J for a conditional use permit for additional classrooms in a "F-30, Single Family Residential" zone at 9000 S.W. Durham Road (Wash,. Co. Tax' Map 2S1 14A, Tax Lots 100 , 101, 200 , 1102, 1201) • .; A. Staff Report: P Read by Laws B. Applicant' s Presentation: o Deb Fennell, applicant, introduced the project a.rchi- tect. o John Schelinin.g, architect, explained the proposed expansion. o FenneJ1 stated that the expansion was minimal and was • not .1..ncreasing the use significantly, outlined the past action for the site, objected to the dedication and street improvements, and itemized cost in compari- son to the amount of improvement. C. Public Testimony: None 179 D. Staff Recommendation • o Staff stated that the city attorney recommended that the item be tabled until he coin„d review the appli 1 cant's lega' l counsel me mo. If the Planning Commis- sion Wished to proceed, however, staff's recommenda- tions would be as follows : Based on findings of fact and conclusionary findings, { staff recommends approval With the following condi- tions: 1. 25 feet of right-of-way be provided along the Durham Road frontage .,.....w...»i .....,..... " rr,m„•».�.,,,��,...,�.."i,,,w,„.,. . .. /. .., , ,,...., •,�„�,,,,,,,,,,,,,•,,,„w„nwamumvtGn , • - • STAFF REPORT }' AGENDA 5 .4 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION November 1, 1977 -- 7 : 30 p.m. Fowler Junior High School -- Lecture Room 10865 S.W. Walnut Street - Tigard, Oregon Docket: Zone Change ZC 36-77 Request: ror a preliminary plan and program review of an industrial planned development in a M-3, Light Industrial, and C-3, General Commercial, zone of parcels totaling 20 .75 acres Location: S.W. Garden Place and S.W. Pacific Highway (Wash. Co Tax L''l Map 2S1 1BB, Tax Lots 200, 300, 800, 1100, 1101, 1200, and the southern portion of Tax Lot 400) ap Applicant: Ron More (Western Racquet Clubs l; • I. Basic Facts: 1. The applicant is requesting preliminary review of a two . t phase commercial, commercial-professional, industrial plan- , ned development on parcels totaling 20.75 acres in accord- , ance with Section 18.56 .020 of the Tigard Municipal Code. . ` 2 . Section 18 . 56 .010 o f t he Tigard Municipal Code states that: • - Purpose. The purpose of the planned development district is to provide, opportunities to create more desirable environments through the appli j' cation of flexible and diversified land development standards under a j comprehensive plan and program professionally prepared. The planned }' development district is intended to be used to encourage the applica- tion of new techniques and new technology to community development k, which will result in superior living or development arrangements with lasting values. It is further intended to achieve economies in land " development, maintenance, street systems, and utility networks while , providing building groupings for privacy; usable and attractive open spaces, safe circulation, and the general well-being of the, inhabitants. 3 . Section 18 .56 .020 provides for preliminary plan and program review by the Planning Commission and requires that such re- view be based upon the comprehensive plan, the Stand a rds of this title and other regulations, and the suitability of • the proposer development in relation to the character of h° the area. 4 . The is presently zoned .. ial) and M * } site .�se oned C-3 (General Commercial) 3 (tight Industrial) and designated Retail Commercial am } Lig ht Industrial on the Neighborhood Planning Organization I � ' ~ ' # 1. ( r 1,4, STAFF REPORT ° AGENDA 5 .4 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION November 1, 1977 . . Page 2 • No 5 Plan. Applicable policies from the Plan are as' fol-� . e lows: Pc licy 20: In the interest of safety and efficiency, the number of 1 highway access points must be kept to a minimum. Wherever possi- ble, bus nesses on Pacific Highway should be clustered and share common parking facilities and driveways. As new development oc- curs, the number of access points should not exceed the number necessary for proper on-site traffic circulation and where pos- '•. ' " sible, should be combined with access to adjacent businesses. . Policy 25: Limit the amount of commercial development to occur in the industrial area allowing only some growth of existing retail and °.• service commercial in the area. 5 . Applicable policies from the Environmental Design. and Open , t Space Plan: ' Policy 3: The City shall restrict alteration of natural drainageways unless it can be demonstrated that the benefits are grater than the de trim nta Z e fr f ec t s, Other jurisdictions in the Fang,o Creek Basin shall be encouraged to do the same. �. Policy 5: The City shall adopt an ordinance to regulate the removal and/or replacement of existing natural vegetation in 7-signated areas (flood plains, drainageways, areas of high visibility, unique habitats or rare species). Significant trees or stands of timber shall also be protected. ( ' Policy 6: Require a site development report (e.g., hydrology, soils, geology) for major projects in designated areas and a statement . Im reflecting methods to be used to minimise the run-off erosion impact of the development on the surrounding area and downstream J properties. Policy 7: Retain the 100 year flood plain o Fanno Creek its t - { p �' r�.bu 1 tari..es, and the Tualatin Fiver as an open preserve (greenway): ° The greenway shall be established as the backbone of the open space network and when a direct public benefit can be derived i.e., when adjacent residential deVe l opment, the greenway should be developed for passive recreation and pedestrian/bike travet: "„ • , III Findings. li • 1. The chairman of NPO 5 has been made aware of the proposal, '' •• and there has been no comment or recommendation on this pro- ject by the NPO. C . 4: 1 j 4 i' r r 1 .,,ul •..... .« aWrrr r..r rvn r.u.rv♦ Ir r.,♦♦. .v__v.r r n..r.r r r. i. .., .., ♦ � .•, .. ... ., .i ....” Iry ..u•.•... .., .. . rw ...�ww ', 11�' . ) . • STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5 .4 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION November 1, 1977 • Page 3 2. The proposed planned development would contain a three-story, 36,000 square foot commercial office building to be located ' in the northeastern portion of the site; a 107,900 square foot recreation facility (containing 20 racquetball courts, ten indoor tennis courts, and 12 automatic ball machine tennis alleys) situated in the central portion of the site; • and eight (8) warehouse/office buildings (varying between . 14,600 and 16,100 square feet, for a total of 127, 300 square feet, located in the south end of the parcel. The proposed development is being planned in two phases. The first phase will consist of ground preparation and the , construction of the commercial office and recreation facili- ; - ties. Phase II will be the construction of the light indus- . trial complex. e 3. The site slopes from the north to the south, dropping from . 212 feet MSL at Pacific Highway to 150 feet MSL at the south . property line . Considerable earth fill has taken place on the upper portion of the site, resulting in a tier effect. • The applicant envisions locating the commercial offices and recreation facility on the newly created fills. The south- ern portion of the site is relatively flat and contains a pond. Red Rock Creek, which flows out of the northeast and V passes under Highway 217, continues through the southeast , portion of the parcel and serves as the primary source of water for the pord. Crystal Lake, which was formerly in • the southeastern corner of the site, has been graded over. 4 . The site is surrounded on the east by Highway 217; to the ' south by industrial development and single family residen- tial (southwest) ; to the west and across Hall Boulevard are apartments; and to the north retail stores, a service sta- V - tion, and Pacific Highway. 5. The 100 year flood plain is at approximately 155 feet (MSL) . •V This represents approximately 32 percent, or 6.6 acres, of ' the site being within the flood plain. In order to provide for the placement of the industrial/office buildings, the • applicant is proposing a substantial encroachment into the flood plain. To accomplish this proposal, the applicant must obtain flood plain fill permit approval, • 6 . Staff is concerned with the proposed encroachment into the flood plain and feels that there are alternaqve site de- . .- velopment proposals that couli be developed that are more o ) • " STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5.4 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION November 1, 1977 Page 4 sensitive to the natural environment and would seek to avoid having development occur to the intensity that is be- ' ing proposed within the flood plain. , 7 . The applicant is proposing to develop a portion of Tax Lot , 400 for "overflow parking" purposes. In order to do this, a minor land partitioning of Tax Lot 400 will be required. 8. Water service is available to the site via a 12 inch line in Pacific Highway and an eight inch line in S.W. Garden Place. Sanitary sewer is also available via a 15 inch line which crosses under Highway 217 at the southeast corner of the site. 9 . The proposed access to the site would be from Pacific High- way and Hall Boulevard. S .W. Garden Place is in substandard - • , condition (no sidewalks, curbs, etc. ) . The applicant pro- poses to vacate a portion of Garden Place to accommodate the locating of the industrial buildings in this area. The Hall , Boulevard access will be provided via a 50 foot dedication • of right-of-way to the west which will result in the exten- , sion of Garden Place to Hall Boulevard. The Oregon State Highway Division has had an opportunity to review the proposal and has requested that the developer provide them with a traffic analysis to determine the impact of access/egress on Pacific Highway and Hall Boulevard. • Staff has also learned that another access point from the site is available vis-a-vis an access agreement which was signed and recorded in May, 1967, allowing access from the southeast corner of the site through properties abutting to the south onto S.W. Hunziker. The agreement provides for a 60 foot easement that would be dedicated for street right- of-Way purposes by the signers of the agreement at such time as it is deemed necessary by the County or City. A portion its of this easement between the Partex and Tigard Distribution ' Center has been paved but is without curbs and sidewalks . The Tualatin Rural tire Protection District has stated that the turning radius onto Garden Place from Pacific Highway is too short for emergency response, and the steep SlOpe ' could present some serious problems in winter conditionS. " 1 , • • . 4,* • y . tiny �� ;;, STAFF REPORT • !F AGENDA 5 .4 . r COMMISSION PLANNING COM M TIGARD PLANN G November .1, 1977 7 7 Page 5 Staff is concerned that the additional traffic that will oc- . cur as a direct result of the proposed development can be safely and effectively merged with the traffic on Pacific . - Highway from the Garden Place/Pacific Highway access. Staff has observed during peak traffic hours that cars on Pacific • . Highway waiting for the signal at 217 and Pacific Highway stack up well beyond the Garden Place access, precluding a ' merging into the east-bound lane or entering out onto the . , , highway and merging into the west-bound lanes: 10 . The applicant's proposed trip generation calculations, based on the NPO #2 Traffic Circulation Plan prepared by Carl But- . j, tke, estimate that 2, 361 vehicle trips within a 24-hour period will occur as a result of the proposed uses: Light Industrial 1,018 ,. Commercial Office 486 Recreation !acilities 857 2 ,361 j . m . Trip generations for the recreation facilities are antici- pated to occur during off-peak hours. i h' . Parking requirements in accordance with Tigard Municipal ' . Code would total 332 spaces. The site plan is providing - for 337 parking spaces. , 11,, The site plan envisions 49 percent of the parcel to be de- • +' voted to open space and landscaping. Light industrial will constitute 14 percent coverage, commercial-office orl.e ,'per- cent, recreation facilities 12 percent, streets and roads ' six percent, and parking/maneuvering 18 percent. III. Con.clusionary Findings 1. The development is predicated upon the issuance of a flood plain fill permit. This permit should be sought before a ' specific development plan is pursued. Otherwise, the Com- mission may be approving a project which is unfeasible to build according to the City' s 2lood' Plain £'ill Permit re- • . . 1- ; quirements and Environmental Design and Open Space ,Plan ; policies. i . i Y b r.. , • • STAFF REPORT .. AGENDA 5 .4 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION November 1, 1977 Page 6 2. The traffic congestion already occurring at Garden Place and Pacific Highway will be further compounded by the anti cipated traffic generated from the proposed uses. An al- ternative access is available from the southeast corner of v the property to Hunziker Street. The Oregon State Highway Division have expressed their .con- .con- cern for this projec.L' s traffic impact on Pacific Highway }' and Hall Boulevard and have requested that the developer ,?' provide them with a traffic analysis to determine this im- pact. IV. Staff Recommendation: , t Based upon the proposal to develop in the flood plain, unre- solved access problems and specific deficiencies in the site development plan, staff recommends denial. If the Commission elects to table this proposal, staff recom-- mends following: .� that the applicant be required to submit the fallowin q g i N • 1. A Iflood plain fill permit application 2 . An analysis of the traffic impacts on adjacent streets, in- 4 cluding consideration of eliminating access to Pacific High- way and utilizing Hall Boulevard and Hunziker Street for this purpose. 3. A site plan associating the recreation facility with the natural environmental features located in the southern por-- tion of the site. • • If the Commission elects to approve the preliminary plan and program, staff recommends that the applicant be required to provide the following information and that certain alterations be made to the applicant 's general plan and program when sub- , mitted for final consideration: 1. A flood plain fill permit application be submitted. 2. The site plan be revised to provide access from the south=- east corner of the site to Hunziker Street and that access be restricted to Mail Boulevard and Hunz' ker Street: • F.1 y t ° STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5.4 ' TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION November 1, 1977 Page 7 3. Proposed street construction standards be submitted for •Y • S.W. Garden Place (to include the proposed extension of Garden Place to Hall BouLevard) 4. That a petition for the vacation of those portions of S.W. Garden Place as proposed by the developer be submitted to the City recorder. 5 . A minor 1a4d.,partition application; be, made for Tax Lot 400 (Tax Map 2S1 1BB) 6 . That a drainage plan be submitted for approval (to pay par- ticular attention to the effect on adjacent sites) . • • 1 11 M th f 1 • MINUTES TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION September. 20, 1977 Page ll ' a Laws s1�.ated staff position: it is now at design review stage; if applicant doesn't agree with staff design review then he should go to the Design Review Board, but this could be avoided if the Planning Commission could recall what their intent was. o Popp stated that a transcript of the tape from , that meeting should be made. 4 0 Wood said that the applicant could go to Design ' $ Review or else redecide now at the Planning Commission. o Popp said that the Planning Commission should hold a new public hearing then. Jr,l,J'r ', C7' Goldbach said that the tape should be heard, then if no conclusive evidence the Planning Commission should rehear the case and the applicant could appeal to the Council. o Wood said that it is too late to appeal to the Council, so the applicant would Pp pp n ould have to reappeal to the Planning Commission. o Popp stated that the staff will prepare a transcript of the tape from that Planning Commission meeting 4 , and if it is still ambiguous, the Planning Commission will rehear the application. 6 . 2 t..Similar use interpreta•L- on Racquet-ball court similar to a drive-in movie. Ron Moore, applicant, was not present at the last Planning Commission meeting so the Planning Commission will reconsider the question. r e Ar Presentation ntation b applicant: Ron Moore and his associate said they had a 20 acre site to be developed as a industrial p light �,park. Ten to 20% would be developed as a racquet ball and • • tennis facility. They have found this ' successful on the Wess t coast tp put racquet ball b al l courts in this type of setting, they have received good response� from the public. It is not a private club but a pay as you go', open to the public on a reservation system . • Nw • MINUTES ' , TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION • September 20 , 1977 Page 12 B. Commission Discussion and Action: o Popp stated that the only way to hear this for consideration by the Planning Commission as a conditional use is if it is interpreted as similar to a drive-in theater, but the e Commission determined at the last meeting that it was not a similar use. • Ron Moore explained the similarities: you drive there, a large space is required, but it is more . healthy. o Wood asked if the Planning Commission could permit it as a planned development as long as they are pr ' going to develop the entire site. r.`. o The applicant stated that the City has just rezoned the site from Commercial to Industrial , before that time they were a permitted use. o Corliss stated that it is similar to the gymnasium conditional use that the Planning Commission � '" approved at the last meeting. o Ron Moore showed a site map showing 14 racquet- • ball and 10 tennis courts, light industrial would come later in four to five years. The tennis building is too large (expensive) for a commercial area. o Wood said that there are two possibilities: { 1. similar to a drive-in movie because of economic problems, or 2. industrial planned development--phase process. 1 I •, o Sakata said that planned development i8 the only way. o Tepedino said that planned development is logical. o Laws asked what area or percentage would be recrea- tional. fa. o Moore answered 6 out of 20 acres o Laws pointed out that over. 25% would be a nonce conforming use in that zone (industrial) , ,.u.,.„,._„ •.,,......w.v ..,.,,,.w...,.,. ,,. ..,_ ._„ ,.....,, .. ,, ...w,w., Y..�..•us.^.a,r +�»xe :cr. .. .•.,. .. a f p • y, r 0 • • MINUTES TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION September 20, 1977 Page13 a I o Po pp sa id they should d appl y for planned Bevel opment-light industrial zone. o Wood explained that for a planned development they would, have to present two times to the Planning Commission and once to the Council. o Popp told the applicants to go planned develop- ment process is the advice of the Planning f Commission. o Corliss asked if the Planning Commission should not consider racquet clubs as to what zone they belong in-it may come up again. .,.. . i zy 6. 3 Popp on Tigard Times article by Cheryl Beshears about Englewood: he thought Wood did a good job during the interview and that the article raised some important ° points. 7. Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned at 10 :45 p.m. • 1 .-... ,....rx.. „, ..•,...,.r. r, r.lr+n,.... .«rrr..r.cw rrrn.r u n.x...:.r.r.xrruwrl rur.r yr. v.r rt, r, r rr,r.rrrr rr.rr rr xrr..,ow i,r ,i , .. - ... - .,_,. .r i ... .- .. r! it r.rdr it ner !r r i, ..r L:1M 111 at • • • MINUTES TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION 0- � � � �� September 6, 1977 Page H o Popp said, we will change it to "certified mail'! then Sakata moved and Tepedino seconded ior, recommendation for adoption to the City Council . w The motion was approved by unanimous voice vote. 6. Other Business : • 6. 1 Similar Use Interpretation Presentation : Western (Racquet Club' j, A. Staff Report : Bolen presented the question of whether a racket club 4q could be considered as a drive-in theater: If so, then it could be considered for conditional use in a T4-3, light industrial zone . He recommends approval of simi- lar use . B. Commission Discussion and Action ;�,' ' o Sakata thinks the logic is funny to compare a drive- •P in theater to a racket club. She doesn 't see it as • similar because racket club is not open air. • o Wood thinks the matter shouldn 't be discussed with- out the applicant present , He said drive-in movies A • require large spaces and nighttime darkness, so are ' put in an industrial zone. They can ' t I go into a commercial zone. He doesn ' t see why racket clubs • couldn 't go into a commercial zone . o Bolen said the answer was that a large enough parcel was not available . o Tepedino said d that since the applicant wash `�t here, • the Planning Commission shouldn ' t consider it, o Bolen said it was just a case of I� the Planning Com- mission interpreting their own code, o Popp and Tepedino said tboy dada l't see any similar- ity between a racket club and a drive in moyie. o Go l db a c1 sa id be approval depended on loca • tion • . .4 'f. • �tf MINUTES , TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION September 6, 1977 Page 9 o Bolen said he couldn 't let them apply for a condi tional use unless the Planning Commission gave him, • :1 a green light that it is a similar use to the al- ,�I lowed conditional use. o Wood suggested that a, certain amount of land is re- 'w served for industrial use by the zoning code and '.. * : that perhaps recreational uses should not cut into M, this amount . Wood moved and Moore seconded to table so that apply- 'A i cant could appear at Planning Commission meeting. Motion failed in a voice vote. • Goldbach moved and Tepedino seconded for denial . ' 4 ' • Motion passed in a voice vote. • '•..•k 6.2 Corliss was selected as alternate on the Design Review a. Board . A' 7. Adjournment : . / t '• p; Y . The meeting was adjourned at 10: 30 p .m. Y a • e, I • N y . a • d .1.0...........0.000;00000000110101.100000.0 1 ei a ;^ •r ? v,) ' * ' . ,.. .. .mom. _ i •. d .. . '• . /q/J L•��"�"© . • , • August 12, 1977 ✓ ,� -, f Mr. Dick Bolen • 0. Planning Director City of Tigard ' 12420 S.W. Main Street , Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Mr. Bolen, , In reference to property located in the City of Tigard in M-3 Industrial zoning, ewe renuest .a judgement .. to the effect that indoor racquet clubs would be inter , ' preted as a similar use to drive—in theaters, which. are designated under conditonal use in the M-3 zoned .' Drive—in theaters and racquet ball ch,.bs are both • entertainment facilities designed for use by the general public and therefore should be considered similar. Thank you for your prompt attention to this request. • r,r''� / (,)1''',i ,'l ///g, • .,+ n G. More y Secretary Western Racquet Club • • • . • • • 4