Loading...
SDR31-77 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. Yr r .. a..u•>, u e I ', 400 I rMC1iENRY MCON'STRUCIJORS,`,INCO 'ORATED ' S .e belopt Revs '' DI 1 77) ° ' ,,; SW 72 d.'ANterue 'I } ' e I R• ∎, • _ I I 'r I t, d I 111 • i • , • ■ 1 I � vl • , -\ r r. r I , u r "I�..._.M1. • .. r.. • a 5 j MeHenry Constructors,` In � r , 15255 S.W. 72nd •• Tigard, Oregon 97223 .• •• Telephone 5631639.7687 ; ti June 5, 3,,978 • ,, City of Tigard � • r 12420 S. W. Main St. 1 I Tigard, Or. 97223 • ,, , Gentlemen: This letter is for your files regarding completion of site work and landscaping at our new office at the above address • We agree to complete thh e site grading and landscaping capirg as per approved plan. The majority has been inspected and approved, with the excep- 1 ' ' tion of one area where soil moisture conditions have prevented us from completing the landscaping. ; We appreciate your patience in this matte and will complete the work within the next few weeks. w Sin e .ely, ' ' ohn. Watson JW:de i I 4 ,, • M r I b ArlitMCtO Authtirized ioaler/Arrnoo l)ulldirt g s Stof71a Y k r. _" , Tics' •, { v , McHenry Constructors, Inc. •a, ' • 15255 S.W. 72nd � Tigard, Oregon 97223 . Telephone 503/639=768`1 • I, • I , • W • , y At b r , r C'A,tai A 49 ilk`s -`lrfet4114 3 PAST-t°t'" . ,,, r t,r t yt lrr ,: it .a r t I, b� Sri I t 1r +'�°t ti YI t n y attt� ,G u � r, '• i tir 11 P,t� wl„.{ r Y f Jt't✓,I. f�r.j ,� `.,,F,s S t./l'D{N t'''••' 1 •� •I i ''''''..1••'sr i'� t+n tit 11 1 t, '1 Itt,,ttt ∎4',' �e dAl?w t°,, ,1��F wi��r y , - �31b', r rtratll trt it i,I�?rt "r.. It1 rttr,'r.t yt l !,!,Jill 141 it { •4 19 yae i.'' 4 I t t tJ. •n.,;k•tt'fnr} PwYr,,",•i �:'ltt,",r , t.,, q,! ' v e r! } 1 ikl l s ".t 1 °,w, 4•t 01 1 t }, y f f 1'' a r w: 1 t , ■ . f . i y a !1 A t!:.,i �Y l t l�,w 'r r i , s 1,1 r■Y ? r/ t 1}tF;■ J I { 1 324 Sequoia 349 ; , a prod i , d' 4 ARMCO Authorized tle&er/A.rrrmoo l5iuildirig Syeteme 1 Y 'lit . 1 -� - , a , . t • • • • 16255 S.W. 72nd . Tigard, Oregon 97223 - Telephone 503/630.7687 February 23, 1978 i. • Mr. Raeldon Barker, city manager Y g e city oJ_ Tigara 12420 S. W. Main Tigard, Or. 97223 ,,,. • Dear Mr. Barker: When I consider all the letters we are compelled to write during tae • year, it is a pleasure to write one voluntarily axed commend your staff ror their competency. }[. We recently rcquested two Design Reviews, a Conditional Use Permit f;. ; and a Minor Land Partition, all simultaneously. My first step was to !` , explain to Nancy Edwards, John Laws and Ed Walden what we Wanted to do, ask whdt they needed, when they .heeded it, ` and What time schedule 1 could expect from them. Your people were both honest and accurate Y say never had a transaction in them' request and l can hoi�estl sa we have n�.v¢. , go that. smoothly. The en oresult is a minimal Work load on your« staf f that M. oit Y s, and minimum time p min�.mal delays im'�m �-J.me ex ended by our, staff. This all translates into cost savings for all concerned. ±,,r . Our firm is involved in locatie ng sites for or our ` clients (both national ional and regional) obtaining financing, design and cons trUCtion. We ,. . sincerel y Look forward to bringing more business into because - . Your Design Review and other related decisions can be made at a staff, it J .,t level. Your �:x:��.er�.a are no more..o:� less stringent; �..t �.s ub� .fess 7 ^ter have Public , g , the ... � � � 1' '`the e'J�..e'GV s and the end result is usually the same, but t s • ha'� ��ubic Design R handled more ro,�es io��all. many a1�.as .:�, � ���. ,� . time involved �s so Y lengthy, i.e. getting on the docket, r e submit wing, etc, Usually, N delays frustrated, does the contractor, > and. cost money. In some instances where owner becomes ��:u era wed, as CoS instances where critical �. Y4 In the owner has a cri�.ical time � i schedule, there are certain areas we Won a evc.n look for a Site and that area loses a prospective business, Again I want to commendLhe above people and we look forward to working with them again. r , v� xu yo x`,, ' r J'oh17. Watson W de Akitilorlzod S .I tea, r • •1 .n:J,« s•n,.. ix+. ..,.:N.bl.w,,,r .�,�m�.«s,.,.«...rF.,.l4.u.r wJ...,..,,.m i.. rlk �1` r r. JY riI,.Y L/1t r� F � g4 ' t Q4 U^it t i;..tuti IY�, I . _ I•,. _ YlYIxO+JrOklry' +o, 1 CITY OF TIGARD 1 N a !Box 23397 ; d , 1242(!4S.1/',/. Main ' 223 � on 9� �o and (>r e 41' 7 � December 20 , 1977 t,1.„ y Ci( 'fiGi‘gD , t McHenry Constructors, Inc. 10255 S.W. Parkway Portland, OR 97225 Attention: John Watson Please be advised that on December 20, 1977 your request for site " plan and architectural review of a two-phase contractor's office L and storage area at 15255 S.W. 72nd (Wash. Co. Tax Ma p 2Sl 12Di T ax 1` • Lot 2700) was approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The landscape plan be revised to show an increased I number of plantings al Ong S.W. 72nd and by the service r. . drive (prior to issuance of a building permit) . 2. The service drive be curbed in order to protect abutting andscaping 1 i 1 �' '•,n Plan check by the Building Department artment will not be initiated u ni il I ' plans have been revised or the necessar y documentation obtained for 1 condition N . 1 as stated above If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to con- tact thisloffice. Sincerely, 1 ' Nancy Edwards A Y, w Community � Design Planner r, r , J:V �ry,rt bm I� Encl. I . r t a • I • i ry • . ti a McHenry Constructors, Inc. ff December 20, 1977 Page 2 I , - Note: The following acknowledgment .must be received by the City of Tigard rywithin fourteen (14) days of your receipt of 'this letter. 1 ailure to return this acknowledgment may result action by the City of Tigard. hereby acknowledge this letter documenting the action of :the Tigard J ' , Planning Director. I have received and read this letter, and I`I agree to the decision here documented and to abide by any terms and/ or conditions atta ,. 0 7 ched. ,;(1//'1 /2 signature/ Date Please be advised that conditions s subject to staff approval must be satisfied prior to iss uance of building permits. • • I I II I f d I Q. AA I ...w.,1,•, .,...,, .,,r.o,.. .w. .. ..,.. ,. . ,., ,r.u.. .. ..I, . ... • ;1 .1 -. .. ., .. .0. r,, ..,u v,..,nu. r ,e Y rr yr a.,. F•1.. ., , , r • w,.}rye r x.x.,mK„ w,.. -.( • ..n � «C+., eA.,.. .ut.x.A». w,..1,. .f.,- �A1Nr..- vu) ,,A..... w1+-..b 1.:t4...r�.4.......-,.a,...... ...,...M!;. , • STAFF REPORT FINAL ACTION v TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW_ ti December 15, 1977 Tigard City Hall `. 12420 S.W. Main Street - Tigard, Oregon Docket: SDR 31-77 (McHenry Constructors, Inc, ) Location: 15255 S.W. 72nd (Wash. Co. Tax ..trap 2S1 12D0 Tax LOt 2700) Applicant: John Watson . Request: For `site plan and architectural review of a two-Phase 'con- tractor s off ice and storage area . SITE DESIGNATIONr I I , The site is zoned "M_3'0' , Light Industrial, and is designated # ' II "Light Industrial" on NPO 5 SITE LOCATION,' r 1 , The is bordered on the east by S.W. 72nd with Convoy Com r pang across the street, on the north by the proposed S .mmon°s, Ma -- tress Company, on the west by the Southern pacific Railroad, and on the south by the intersection of the rail lines and 72nd. PROPOSED USE: McHenry Constructors Corporation proposes to locate their of- Tice and storage operations on the site. PREVIOUS ACTION MLP 12.77: On November 3, 19.77 k a minor land partition forming . the lot in question was approved. All conditions attached, to this approval have been fulfilled: CU 27 77 On October 4, 1977, a permit e,�'ma�t for I �;. -' Conditional use outside storage was approved subject to the following 'condition: o A landsca p e p lan be submitted for deign rev,i ew a Prcva1 1 . . . which provides sight-obscuring screening around the storage area SITE DESCRIPTION: 1I1 The site is a flat, vacant parcel with no significant vegeta- tion other than natural grass, . I a , .,,.,r.,.... .,, _... . .. . . .. ,,. , ,. ,.....rw .,..r,:. ,.,w..,,,, .,1..,, rw,r,..r ,.. . . .,,r., ... . . ..... ...,....ti., .... 1.,.L. 1 ,. a. �. • ;,,, .x.,,..., r � w , 1 1 I . f I STAFF REPORT FINAL ACTION . ii TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW December 15, `1977 , PageI PARI<ING REQUIREMENTS: . 1 Phase One: j' . f office -- 1,800 square feet divided. by 350 = 5.3 ' O Storage 800 square feet divided by 1,500 = . 5 5.8 or '6 spaces • hasp Two: a I P . Storage 800 square feet divided by 1,500 .5 or l space 1 \ ` SITE PLAN REVIEW The applicant is proposing to build a two story office-storage building with an attached outside storage �' aide sec a se of the un- usual • triangular shape of the property and abutting rail lines, the building orientation and vehicular circulation possibilities are limited. The submitted plan deals with these problems adequately,y The landscape plan is deficient in several lar.eas. The number p „ of plantings; should be increased along S .W. 72nd and by the service drive, Hopefully, this increase will present _a more pleasing View to the public and will decrease future maintenance costs, The lout- • 1 side Storage area has been screened as per the Planning Commission condition. Extruded curbing should be placed along the serviOe . . drive to avoid encroaching into the landscape areas. I ; S.W. 72nd is in deteriorating condition and will be in need of improvement. A L.I .D. agreement was a condition of t1;;.e MLP' and has been received. I , IN � w: ARt���xTE�,.cuz�.A.L REv � • The building is two story, masonry1 clay blockS-1.earth tone with cedar trim as accent around the office portion of the building. STAFF tECONENDATION I . Staff recommends a pproval with the following conditions: 1. The landscape e Plan be revised to show an increased n umber of plantings along S.W. 72nd and by the service drive (prior . r to issuance of a buileing permit) , 4 j M r I I I ! I • • • ...,..+.. • r I 1 STAFF REPORT -- FINAL ACTION a• TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW December 15, 1977 Page 3 t • 1I • • 2. The service drive be curbed in order to protect. abutting � • landscaping. '., il .mil :'�" �7 #° • n a / z j Ri.chard Bolen Planning Director • • • • { e.• • • • • . I • • 1c • :,. �... ... r .,. . _ .. , .,.. ..., .. ,. w.,....I�... .,.•. .�.... «-. ..�. .ruW,a A ...,i., .. r. ••,. n ,. r.,n � 1. „ r.u, .i..,..,.•.,., 4• o• •M r h;.• ' R1 kµ,1 .NARY •EVI mcHenry constructors„ Augu.s 24, 1977 1 . The fclie. i � items need to be mp .eted� Prior to issUance of a building permit: a. Minor Iad partition approval granted and recarrded b. Conditional use permit for outside storage granted by Plan- ning x Commission • c„ Dedication of property along S.W. 72nd '. (The City requires ;30 feet from center lino) - " I a . .- d. Non-remonstrance agreement for an L.I.D. along S.W. 72nd. 2. The minimum curb cut required by the City is 30 feet, with 24 . feet (f paving. Both driveways should be brought up to this mini- , . mum, The code also requires five feet of landscaping between the property line and the drilreway; room should be allotted for this between the north property line and the driveway. 3. The normal procedure for outEide storage has been to require V e- tative screening. Therefore, room should be allotted between the north th property line and the fence R 4' Coraside . tip n should be given to fronting the building to S.W. than the parking lot 72nd rat�er than � , 5. k A 2C 'afoot landscape strip is necessary alon the S.W. 72nd prop., ; . t line. encroach on this landsea er parking is not a�.�cWed. to encr p ing b ThereTbre t' the two parking spaces on the southern portion of the property should 'be shifted. 6. The alext step in the review process consists of incorporating the above comments in the site plan and resubmitting two copies of , detailed plans. These plans should include the following: landscape plan Irrigation plan A.,rdhitectural floor plan and elevations Color samples Topography existing and prepased, Existing trees, C.: 1 If you have am questions on the above matters, -lease do not hesi- tate to call this office, • A 4. SITE DAVE LOPN N c ��PLAN T D DESIGN REVIEW x r Site Plan Review kai� , ,Ir' I" ' _e N o. „ w - l ,. ° r Architectural Review Fee Received � � '� , , Recipt 4 /7 3./ _____ , v APPLICATION —...-__.. a � .� ._- Date Re c e ive d ,�i � /77 . Tigard Planning Commwi.ssion r--- main Tigard,g 9 C1r,, 97223 • 12420 SW Ma1n 1 and 639-4171 .... , . ; : :: •�°'1, t:r.tr, ora"L'3-e 1-6rzg 1 " J `L e - -- - - . . Project Address ` ' ,,a,E;ha., , =�.sir6�c." -r. . 'I �`��-� ""*__'�" 'Ar14m Cfine'k cog itiic.7- Tax Map No. rx}. - `� - ���' � , Tax �p t No, �.�? U `�....� r ,� I o l op e�' l Ft. `I, .�iv ,�6,07" "�(� ld , Dev �J • I 4 C�VJY]e r� D � _ ,�,,.,.� , i ca ©r�T�le Telephone.. Address 5;10 �r 0 r ��-V►__,_„�•l L! �i1'b 6 �'7 0�•,.�.,,_, p ..,..,.+.;._ ..._,_....._ Owner 1 s .,,,.e Telephone . r Signature '�, D SCRIPTIO1 OF .ROPER.T ' ' .G i t s S q. ,E�t, ____ Proposed �T---e _ Buildings I I # TJr ., . ''', 0 Feice, ' 1(etalt(:)ctsc it it-z_igt,.,_ t iA 1-i.ii-,___________A__QOD__. , _ r , Site Size , Tot. Sq Ft. of Buildings , ,r0� r � Sq. Ft. of Fa\rin ., 9,75',,a C.I Sq. Ft. o Landscaping 10„41c25_(_:)__, r Anticipated Developrr,ent Date ,____ c,1,A*_ 4 .- c; cat ._..___ •_..; . Anticipated Development Phases X1 Q90 DA coni 'L.. co c .ww_ b • Valuation t ,A ;i ti --W- DO NOT 1,gRTTE;_BELOW THIS L,l7\T • ' ST, ';cial Conditions Dedications , : Bondin Other v�.....n '—... . n...r.r.wwr.:h.«.,:_».w+.w r..+w..-„�..u,••�•.,.�+sw._, ,. .rwW_=.�«...•.•s .. . aw,..r....•e...w..;.....r . . Final Inspection 'by •...++.+.+..w«ww Date ..,.......:w..•.....•...w•.•...w.....wr.+++,.»�,wr..+....w+...••.�..•r,.,.ax,.,......r..r....•,•+�•-r . .l.....{ .. „.....fo.r.. , I • I r ' •« ..m,+.a� nralna-nsn•w op.xNlmr(� - (• j . . .1-.. ,c i A! r 1�.