SDR11-77 POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
•
•
•
•
• ..,..�...,,.,W! w-+,•�.r1.r.I,,a.,,..ar•m«�J,.,..::Ir..r„«..r,.,,..�.a,k.r,✓••.d„,�.,.1..N•M,««.■.;�..r„�....,«.I.r.«..., r�:Y, .�-.+I,r,l,,::,M..�.1;�.t,. ..,.a r,l.�..u.�.. ,� u ,a /
• Yr � Y '.+.WJ M A .m+! /I 1 xr 1 ...r•w.r6M MW A..N.-.uiR:%Misr+�n*'Lnl.. .Warn+���A�."}tr.y,�n1.�+1i+�.,+RM,.••r41.�rrrlx.,n.ru.6,.+..A�.,^nt++,hnHti���fi...i.-«rIrIM�.«a `„I,.r
[
SEER,
•
S ��.e Develc�p�n�nt, Review (SDR
',y - , `,' I� I I III ��. ,
12hb60'I•SW Ha: :N1 Botileva. c = ;�
,,,',%.y `.r, err.C -•',,:rw1r U.3..rr F:�r•t'dr -!J '� t i� -1 ..,t,i I7r
t,f ' �r:�• v,»..:.1.-.c:i•«.., •.�w•.«..+,w._ +.4,..,...e...-w«..-..,ti..4.,u..
�,. a w
,
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
II I,
• I ,
•
a l,'
• 0 •
•
•
r
'.1
I r
RIM
•
r
I, P
• L' r
V r �
•
4
•
. a
I n1 CITY OF
P. 0. Box 23557 . i ��,
12420 S. W Main
Tigard Oregon 97223 f ,".
"
April 22, 1977
Macadam Equipment Company
6639 S .W Macadam
g . •
Portland Oregon
Dear Sir
;; Please be advised that the Tigard Design Review Board at their reg'u-
.lar meeting of April 12, 1977 approved your site development plan of
p storage architectural addition to a structure .
a proposed s�Lora e tank and an archi•t
at 12560 S .W. Hall . This approval is subject to the following condi-
tions ,
1. Shore pine be extended around the eastern corner of the
fence
2. The planting bed be widened to a minimum of 8 feet . —.
If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact
me at this office.
Sincerely,
�-� � %f.
Nancy Bc wards
Planning Assistant
NE/j h
cc: Mackenzie Engineering, Inc
Note The following acknowledgement must be received by the City of '
Tigard within fourteen (14) days of your receipt of this let-
ter. Failure to return this acknowledgement may result in ,
action by the City of Tigard,
I hereby acknowledge this letter documenting the action of the Tigard
• Design Review Board I have received and read this letter, and 1
agree to the decision by a �.�ion here documented and to abide
b: any and/
or conditions attached
., ,'. .,. . ,,,,tillr'',,,,terk _ tt, -J. ____, rc'_.,.1. ...e7,-..2,t.5— /,://7 .,. .
�. e
terms
,, ,h.ature r ate ,,,,'
ease conditional subject to staff� Pl r b'P' advised that conda.t�ona subject approval Must be
satisfied prior to issuance 1of building permits
r • 4 (40, i) e., . .
l
STAFF REPORT -: .AGENDA 5 . 5 �:-;
• TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
. April 12, 1977 - 5: 30 P.M.
Tigard City Hall
21420 S .W. Main Street Tigard, Oregon
yr �
• DOCKET: SDR 11-77 (Snyder Roofing) '.
,
•
{
REQUEST: Review of a proposed storage tank and an l architectural ad-
d dition
LOCATION:
1256 0
B W Hall 1
.
. APPLICANT: McKenzie Engineering
I. BASIC FACTS :
• 1. The site is designated "General Industrial" fan the Tigard
Community Plan and zoned "M-3, light industrial''
n December 7, 1976 the Planning Commission approved an
;. 2 . a , � g
Tonal use permit which allowed a
amendment to the conditional
sight obscuring fence rather than plant material with the
following conditions
A a. Outside storage no higher than l ' above the
redwood
od
slats.
b. Two additional Red Maple trees be located along the
front for purposes of screening.
c. The sight obscuring ability of the fence e be maintained. r
. d. Fence height be determined by Design Review Board.
3. On December 20, 1976, the Design. Review Board approved the
remodeling for Snyder Roofing with the following conditions :
T
The north fence be 8 ' the east fence 6' , and the north '
a. and. east fence and >
- � gate sight obscuring.
d gate be ry,
h. Evergreen shrubs be added to the front planting for the p g
purpose of screening the parking area (subject to staff
•
_.. approval) .
c. The Red Sunset maple be 1.e-1i" caliper 8.10 ' tall.
. i
within a reasonably
d. Hose bobs be reasonable distance of locate. w
the plantings (Subject to staff approval) .
III
I ,
---7"""..-''''""'"'"''''.-''''''''•. L` '
. •x,viF 11 "A,aA.41 u'4d'AY l. � -
•
STAFF REPORT -- AGENDA 5 .5
TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
April 12, 1977
Page 2
r
II . FINDINGS '
1. The Planning Commission approved outside storage for the
site with the condition that it be no higher than 1' above
the fence and that Design Review Board determine how much
of the fence should be site obscuring. In reviewing the
plan in December, Design Review determined, that only the
front portion of the fence needed to be sight obscuring.
2. The applicant is now proposing to install a 10 ' high, 40 '
u long storage tank in the rear portion of the site. Because
of the topography it is hard to determine whether the tank
will be more than 1' above the fence or not . However, the
, main intent of the Planning Commission was that storage be x '
kept within a reasonable height and that it be screened if
I•
necessary.
. 3. The site plan specifies 5 shore pine on the rear lot line.
These pine should be continued around the southeastern cor-
• ner to screen the side view of the °tank. In addition,` the
planter bed is specified as being only 5 ' Wide. This
be expanded to
4 should help,p ` insure plant survival.
4. No color has been specified for the tank. It should be as ti
unobtrusive as possible.
r ,
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval with the following conditions:
1. S pine be extended around the eastern corner of t
• ,• ',
1. bore i around he ;' •
n
fence.
2 : The planting bed be widened to a minimum of 8 ' .
•
I ;
if
•
P Y F
tyr
r 1
k.. ; .t..» .•.,.,n.«.a ro«>aaa..'rci �r]]I 77LL��JJ
MINUTES' :'
TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
• April 12, 1977 - 5: 30 P.M.
Tigard City Hall
12420 S .W . Main Street - Tigard, Oregon
•
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL: Present : Hammes, Olson , ,,:cMonagle, Cook
Excused Absence : Goldbach
Staff : Edwards and Daniels
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES : The minutes of February 8, 1977 and March
22, 1977 were approved as read. '
4. COMMUNICATIONS : None
5 . DESIGN REVIEW:
5 .1 SDR 46-76 (Dickin sen) %
A request for architectural review of color samples for a
Previously approved building
. A. Otto Van Wal tyn y engineer, specified d a w o od cedar
r facia
with a dart stain and raked concrete and anodized trim.
(A. color chart was submitted. )
•
Olson moved and Hammes seconded to approve the color
samples as specified.
The motion was approved by unanimous voice vote.
5 .2 SDR 10-77 (Lamb Weston)
A request by Hoffman Engineering for site plan and 'arohitec- „
Proposed sq. ft . addition to an ex- N
tux'a1. review of. a roposed 7, 5b0 s .Ct . ad
isting building at 6600 S .W Hampton, '
f I . Site Review
A, Staff Report :
I .
, L
Read by Daniels
B. Staff Recommendation !
Staff recommer d o approval with the following condi-
t t(„ns a'
. 1 , A non-remonstrance agreement be filed with the
city recorder for the improvement o f S+ .W. Hampton .�.
street
Y,
/ 1 ! �',I I J, I 1 li.l, 'i. • 'd �
n
.,. .:.... ..:.:.. .. .....:.:.: .,..i,.•,. r...,.;.. - al i il.,:l. ... ......i 1.Jf.;'i'4R.„.u:.. ,,•. x.,..z.,t.:A ..
.• .,.x4+. ' ., .. n .,. _J..E.;..,t« l-,w a . .J Y w!.,I, .Ir .Yn .n ,!.l,r. »:i .t._...t4. ,. s.i
✓ J:n :.. .;. 8«+4f.,..:I4L.S«C + J4 .r.lean s»+IJ.NIwJHpw.
4
MINUTES
.:.1.// TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
April 12, 1977 5: 30 P.M.
. Page
2.' S .W. 68th Avenue be improved and a street tree
program be initiated (matching the standards ap-
proved for the Farmers Planned Development) .
a
This improvement should be in conjunction bnction with
the development of the Farmers Planned Develop-
ment . -.
3. An irrigation plan be received .
p
C. Applicant ' s Presentation:
Tom Whittaker, architect, presented `pictures of the
site and explained the project.
D. Board Discussion:
o Discussion on S.W. Hampton Street and S .W. 68th .
Cook moved and Olson seconded for approval of the
site
plan with the staff recommendations .
The motion was approved by unanimous voice vote : ,
II . Architectural Review:
• o Tom Whittaker, architect, described specifications,
as per architectural plan, with colors to match the
existing building.
Olson moved and Hammes seconded to approve the architec-
tural plan as submitted.
• The motion WP approved by unanimous voice vote.
°' 5 . 3 SDR 8-77 (Canterbury Square)'
• A request by Kolve and, Iettleberg for site plan and archi--
tectural review of a proposed. 1,700 sq. ft addition at
14363 S.W. Pacific Highway .
•
Site Review:
A. Staff Report :
o Read by Daniels
.'n
1
t
iav
'
9
1 I�
I .
,.k a• +uv.r.r .t 'r.xd...,. .x u...IM+M-+.F.1 I'..Ik 4 S•.Y.A.1
}
•
M
1, I
p A .
MINUTES
( TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ;•
April 12 ,, 1977 - 5: 30 P .M.
4 % Page 3
I I� o Staff presented d
a
memo m
o
with regard and to
past st'
Plan-
ning an-
ning Commission actions regarding Canterbury
Square
B. Staff Recommendations :.
t:
e�
SLafi
recommends approval with the following condh.
tions •
1. That a lighting n g
system be installed in the h.e pedes
-
trian walkway .
n 2 That a landscape plan and irrigation plan imple-
,
• mentating Finding #5 be submitted (subject to
staff approval
ovai'
� 1
,• S. That a landscape plan for Canterbury Square (i
n
corporating all Planning Commission conditions)
new
addl.-
,� � � Icy of the 1
e s�xbn�ia.tted. prior to occupti�x
tion ,
C. Applicant ' s Presentation :
o Jerry Kolve, applicant, presented the plan and
discustsed the staff conditions
•
o Don Ki;ttleburg, applicant , protested Staff Recom-
mendations #2 and 3.
D Commission Discussion:
o Al Monagle suggested that an island be placed on ,
the end of the parking row, rather than a long •
center Strip,b
Hammes moved and Cook seconded for approval with the
following conditions
1. the
That planter be installed in the last two
parking stalls
2. That a lighting system be installed in the pedes-
t{t).
Irian walkway
n walk be installed from the Pay '
�,
5 That a concrete�.ng in front to the paved area in back.
au
o 9 { I r it •I
.� ry
,
,: .,; ... ....-. ..,,."-...x. _..r ..».xr. N.• +, h...a -,,.-. w .'u. w A.,i.eW u•A {,-.,,;,.:.. I N r„>r.....11.',_ _?.2..r...!it«,1....N.r-t l.{..N.YM1 ax.Il.1:ry .,,I)<;i.s:.lr,✓,«.....4W....x.:tU:aaN:1
111h4
MINUTES
• TT CARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD I ,
April 12, 1977 - 5: 30 P.M. i ?,
, Page
4. That the sidewalk area in front of the new store in- .
corporate a landscape bed and possible street furni-
ture
�., (subject to staff review) ,
' ( Cook moved and Olson seconded to amend the motion to
state: No building permit be issued until staff re-
'
;M' searches the conditional use permit landscaping require- '
ments and for, the applicant to submit evidence . that all
conditions of the Conditional Use Permit were satisfied.
Cook moved and Olson seconded for a second amendment that
a detailed landscape plan for the entire site be submit--
p P
"sued to the Design Review Board prior to issuance of oc-
• ' cupancy Permit .
o McMonagle asked that staff investigate past condi
tional use before the next meeting.
Vote on motion with 2 amendments
The motion failed in a° 1 to 3 voice vote
with Cook, 01-
son, and McMonagle dissenting.
Vote on motion with first amendment :
' 1
The motion was a pproved b y u nan amozs voice
J II . Architectural. Review:
ti ' Iu
o Tom Vadnai•s, architect, stated that the building would } '
brick,ick matchin
. be br .g the existing building, with a shake ' 1 /
roof canopy.
r Olson moved and Cook seconded to approve the architecture
as presented
The motion was approved by unanimous voice vote.
• ,
5.4 SDR 9-•77 (Burdic ,/Forbes)
A request b y Construction Services, Inc. for site plan and
architectural review of a convenience market and office com-
' plex at Ureenbur ; Road and Shady Lane
I . Site Review;
A. Staff Reptort
. M
r
4
6 �} l
L .
,
MINUTES .
TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
`
April 12, 1977 - 5: 30 p.m.
Page 5
Read by Daniels
l
Re
e
o a_
y Dan
B. Staff Recommendation:
' Staff recommends approval with the following condi-
tions
1. Cross easements for the joint driveway be re-
corded prior to issuance of the building permit
2. S .W„ Greenburg be improved to City standards, 1, Mj
with paving 32 ft , from center line and an 8 ft .
sidewalk adjacent to the curb
; 3. The existing trees be incorporated into the lend-
scape plan wherever possible
Al .. e
4. . Evergreen trees be ..added to the rear landscape ,
area
5. A maple tree be added to the landscape island by
the service drive
N' G �
Irrigation plan an d revisit! landscape plan be
.
submitted prior to the br„: ding permit
7. A signing program he established and returned to
Design Review
8 . Refuse container be screened on all sides (sub-
,„ jest ,to staff approval)
C. Applicant ' s Presentation:
H arley Adams, Construction Se.i.,vices, explained the
project and discussed the staff conditions,
. , a D, Commission Discussion:. ,
b Discussion on half-street improvement and systems
development charge
,
Cook moved and I-iamnee seconded for approval with
. F. staff recommendations ,
b M Morlagle stated he would Vote because he believed
Item #2 should be clarified by the City Council , ,
i
•
„r ::. .. ,♦ ,e.a.:.. ..,. .,.,.ry ,.-,. ..i,u.F.,,r,,t.;aG;:.,+,.,,Y:. .»rr..w,4.,,ti+F:,M..<«f.:;a.,f„ri,. mAe..uHr,..:1ir,vb. ,.In-,N..,,.Y.i...glaa,,;..,...a...lwta« ar.:.S2:.. ..t.a.7; e
'i, •/ ! 5r...:ti C _tG, .o..r,,,w.,.,..r+e,+ilrirrs,u 81s.}wya,
MINUTES
. TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
April 12, 1977 5 : 30 P.M.
Page 6
-�
The motion failed in a tie vote, with Olson and Mc--
Monagle dissenting.
' Olson and Cook moved for approval with staff recom-
. mendations and that Staff Condition #2 be remanded
back to City Council .
• The motion was approved 'by unanimous voice vote.
.
, II . Architectural Review
. • o Harley Adams stated that minor changes w o uld be made
to the architecture plus a bicycle rack would be pro-
vided. Color samples were submitted.
Cook moved and Hammes seconded for approval Pp roval as submitted.
};:y The motion was approved by unanimous voice vote w
("'°:.;7;( )SDR 11-77 (Snyder Roofing)
--,...:)
' A request by McKenzie Engineering for site plan and archi
u
' ' tectural review of a proposed storage tank and an architec-
tural addition, to a previously approved structure at 1250
S .W 0 Hall
I . Site Review
A Staff Report :
o Read by Daniels
B. Staff Recommendation:
Staff j
�.aff rccommcnds r pproval with the following condi- `�
approval a
1 Shore pine be extended around the eastern corner
of the fence
2. The planting' bed be Widened to a minimum of 8 ft 0
C. Applicant ' s Presentation:
x x x
o Dave Welch, McKenzie Engineering, agreed to staff
conditions and specified a, buff color for the
'
tank
r - .,. .,. .,...�.,..w�rt.vx�•„4i.r ,1..ss,frr -.•.0 u.i..J..,.-....nw..r,. ...• ... u.wt✓vw,ai sr.�..ur.e A;...Nr1:�.�Jlu 4�,..J.i x.w�_.Aw.,e ... ... . ,.... wcL,.,ww3+A U4H.w.
... �' x..•.. i4... 1i�n>H,.YSNA r a.11 � . rtt x. u. ,.e ,..�Y , a d•. u.-... .
MINUTES
, TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
April 12, 1977 5 : 30 P.M. `
Page 7
D. Board Discussion :
Hammes moved and Olson seconded for approval with
the staff conditions.
II . Architectural Review:
o Dave Welch described the cant pd . submitted color
;samples
Hammes moved +
and Cook seconded to approve the canopy as � �,
presented.
The motion was L a
ppr.oved by unanimous voice vote .
6. OTHER BUSINESS:
There being no
o t�er business,ne s
y the meeting
wa s adjourned ou rned at 8 : 30.
•
•
L I
it
r " u
'.r,.-..u..'°rc....,..»..a..,4.u....4,4NI..,�4w.0.-.u.ups..w,+wa,rwc.a;.wur.w.wu_,,.,a..r.._7r.ra.n„«,w.:gt.....t•∎4,,..f:C-.,,.1.,.1.L4Z.i.,,aw,.ouruu,•. .asrtr.lr.,,14 r«.,.�.<W0.:h+;ia rr . ...:i ay:» +»w,�esnurwr:.,war urMC�-.-i.-a.:..r..
•
77050
JOB NO,
M
d• - - MACKEI(( ' ENGINEERING INCORPORATED '+
x,;� . 5 1977),; 324 S W.ABERNETHY',
;
•
.> ,''•.M __,_. PORTLAND,OREGON 97201 'Roofino 4 9560 Y 1I
.
• R E C.F RO M PHONE 5032 -; _ P
Maoac nt Equipment CO.r
'
6689 S W. Macadam •
Buiiding Remodel - Design Review City Of Ti 'atc
SUBJECT I
,�UB�o� �T '.
TRANSMITTED HEREWITH: ' .
, )PRINTS I'
,
SHOP OWGS _ I q
SEPIAS •
'1 check in the amount of $3O foe Design Review fee
sa.gn ature on Site 1:■evelct:arnent Pl.an arld Design gn review f'Oxtn
p
.
•
, l ,
BY
•
r 666
F
r
•
I
i
r
..,. _ +I:. .[_ c.!, ,I r Ua. ,.x.., ,.un .•..I». .,R....r,:.4: .J. ..neu ..Wk .1. «•:.:1 ,
SITE DEVELOPMENT, PLAN ,.`..STD DESIGN REVIEW
Site Plan Review
File No.
Architectural Review 30 .00
Fee Received $
APPLICATION
Receipt �/
.0 ^ Date Received r.. `:-7.7
Tigard Planning Commission
12420 SW Main St. , T,igard, Or. 97223
^ 639,_4171
Project Title BUILDING REMODEL Date Piled j
Project Address 12560 S . W. Hall Blvd.
ti Map No. 2�,S�l-4EC Tax Lot No. 2401 and 2401-A2
Tax • .
,
Owner/Developer
•�' � x er .�..
Develo p MACADAM EQUIPMENT COMPANY I
Address 6639 S. W. Macadam Telephone 244-7593
Owner's ,. . . Telephone
Sigrla`tur ~-�-
' DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
I I
Proposed Use #Buildings #
Units So. 't.
Light manttfacturing arnd storage 1 bldg 24,050
" L ,
' Site Size . Tote_ S Ft off' Bu'. n s 24 r05 c
., w . . 32 000 s , . �'�. 1 - .' i$25 � . ft'
Sq. ��t of Paving Sq Ft. of Landscaping 1
r � q
Anticipated Development Date sc�o r
}
Anticipated Development Phases .. � _�.� .. 1
$10 ,000
V al ,ati on
DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE
Special Conditions - Dedications
Bonding
Other
Final Inspection by Date
,4 I
'ht,, cppt"hn, i
0 fin..
( - ' ^ w
[Page Too Large for OCR Processing]