SDR10-77 POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
[Page Too Large for OCR Processing]
r y n
a.....^,„A,a,..... "' 4rJ...1,..�..,r.;.rb.vi.t.:.«�n..�•.a1,�}elA��.'�a ,� 1..wr��JN�r,..,IJ.,.r�:«...✓oJ`.^ 1Y.:•4.��. r..,,,wtL.xM .5..:'F"erne•
„c"Cr ,u wl§.l°� aa,J•.a,..n r.unk.,+w:lFMr�Ar.-���%�,u�••.alw.•r.r_....a..ra.lr W.....,n. YA N+ d'aYS'le+v
vl ....ww r•n r r^.w ^••w `�Y-""-` y-• ^-_-•»t w r ,
a. �4 Ld� {t Yrt
I 7.,
v., t r'7+ tia 1} % I°;.t.ai rl t
',N�ik• .�:..,l.1 I,,. J 1 u 4. rV J... «:na1r.«..w.yc.,n-..i.ne........:Cr«...T-.a,�^.. „»�
• $1 1. � ` ��,ftl 1.+� i. , 1^
' r
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
•
•
• I I
•
' v
r
i
•
•
•
•
°
l pp
C_
Fl ' ,6Y_
• II w
•
r
•
AP9± , 2% 1977
•
' J Hofxnari :Engineering
900 11.ifttl.
Portland n Oregon
Dear Mr, Bullock:
Please be advised that the Tigard Design Review Board at their megu-
lar meeting 01 April 12, 1977 approved Your site development plan and
• architectural design for a proposed 7,500 sq tt ft. addition to an ex-
' istinglbuilding at 6800 S.W. Hampt on b This approval is subject to
the following conditions:
1 A non-remonstrance agreement he filed with the city recorder
for the ;. pro r me t: of S.W. Ham: ton Street
' 2 S .W. th Avenue be improved and a street tree program he '
• , initiated (matching the standards approved for the Farmers
Planned Develo �m nt)» This improvement should he in con j nc-
t;ion vith the development of the Farmers
Develop-
ment ,'L
3 irrigation Plan be submitted for staff approval. •
If we can be further assistance, please do not 'hesitate to contact
me at this o ' w ice
sincerely
Nancy Edwards
' •. ..f/j
Assistant
L L,
Note: The followi ng acknowledgement Must be received by the City of 1 •
•
Tigard d within your receipt
result Wer r i re to return, this acknowledgement ma
the City Tigard
•
• . Z hereby acknoWUedge' this letter documenting the action of the Pigard
. "g C m Mis' a 4M„k X hve received an.d read this letter, and X
t 1 411 •"
I I
I•
•
r ,
ti
: 1
•
Hoffman Bngineering
900 Fifth Aventle
. Portland Oregon '
•
Page
agree to the decision here documented and to abide by any terms ands
or conditions attached.
•
•
�' •' ul.,r....a..-`n•i.,w...•r......w•+..:..••....-o.r......•.•,...,.•-wvwMM•'.e+n...,.•Mw...,+..... ,.+w.,w,w4h.,..,.a.�r....., _..r...,«....w«r.q,..,.M�+�w•I..:r:...+,r..avw.�w.w.,u�w.w «w..u.w..d
S1gu*tore Date
Please by�'. G4 ViK d that conditional. subject W staff
a4 pylW l must
be
satisfied prior to issuance of building permits.
•
•
•
•
r
1
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
A
it
I i
f .
' P
STAFF REPORT - AGENDA 5 .2
' . TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
April 12, 1977 - 5 : 30 P .M.
Tigard City Hall
. 21420 S .W. Main Street -- Tigard, Oregon
•
DOCKET: SDR 10-77 (Lamb Weston)'
REQUEST: For site plan and architectural review of a proposed 7,500
�,.
sq, ft . office complex addition
LOCATION: 6600 S .W. Hampton Street
•
APPLICANT: Hoffman Engineering
I . BASIC FACTS :
' •
1. The
site
S iL e is zoned C-P (Commercial Professional) and desig-
nated
"Residential Commercial" on the Tigard Community
•
plan
I
I7: FINDINGS.
lo The applicant is proposing to add roughly 7, 550 sq . ft . to
an existing office complex., This project phase was antici-
pated during approval 1973.
. �. � ppx�ov Land-
, tl�.e original complex a, al in
' scaping, parking, etc. were oriented around this possible
addition.
2. S .W. Hampton Street is in deteriorating condition and
should be improved to city standards .
- 3. S . 68th Avenue is presently dead ended at the southern
property line. This Street' is Projected to connect with
the Farmers Planned Development to the south and allow traf-
f is access onto S .W. Hampton Street . The improvement of
S .W 1 68th should coincide with the development of Farmers
Planned Development , A street tree planting program should
be implemented at the same time .
4 . The applicant has proposed to upgrade the existing land-
. din around the northeastern corner of the soaping property
This landscape area currently consists of a grove of red
wood trees, several of which are dead or dying1 3esides
replacement of 'the trees$ additional plant material should
• . t
be incorporated for weed control and to upgrade a rather 0'
barren planting,
I
5. No irrigat .on has been spec .. ed
I; h
. 1.
rY
1 ■t 4.1 ,.,. .,,..c ,la ir. 1
le .,,,.1 ,...J.t-.�. ..��1,x,;,w�...l,.��.-ti! «e.,...�awrit u..,,.,.�� , -.v.. .aa:.....a...4.K6.W,era a.e::;it, `i u.•„r« 'uarc 4
■
STAFF REPORT - AGENDA 5 .2
TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD • • :
s • April 12, 1977 5 : 30 P,M. . '.
P age 2
III . STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends approval with the following conditions : '
. 1. A non-remonstrance agreement be filed with the city recorder
for the improvement of S .W. Hampton Street;.
2 . S .W. 68th Avenue be improved and a street tree program be
.\.
initiated (matching the standards approved for the Farmers -
Planned Development) . This improvement should be in con-
the Farmers Planned De
o�rn�nt . the development of I vel- .
junction with ti ..�e1o•�►
3 . An irrigation plan be received.
•
•
I •
I I
'-ii '1` -,11'
,
a
1 .
i
I
P �
4
r
.■
■
u I
... A .. ._« , r.. ,.,4:.MA.1A,.«.t.. ..a E. :.J,....L„.t...i..w, e ...n..v,,..a.,--. ..•i.au.« ,
•
,-,. w.,; u,.....,ay..^V,.zM ...,a::t+.. •.... ....-c.,..._,. .-M.u.... •air. ..ua+uwr'.;ca� - ,
MINUTES
TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
April 12, 1977 - 5: 30 P.M.
Tigard City Hall
12420 S .W. Main Street Tigard, Oreg
w O
1, CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL. Hammes, Olson McMona le Cook
r
Excused Absence : Goldbach ”
f
Staff: Edwards and Daniels
' MINUTES : The minutes of February `8, 197 7 and March
3. APPROVAL
OF MI NUT
gib{' r 22, 1977 were approved as read
4. COMMUNICATIONS : None .
5. DESIGN RE'tt IEW
5 .1 SDR 16-76 (Dickinsen)'
A request for architectural review of color samples for a
' previously approved building
A. Otto Van Walstyn, engineer, specified a wood cedar facia
with a dark stain and raked concrete and anodized trim.
(A color chart was submitted. )
Olson moved and Hammes seconded to approve the color
samples as specified
The motion Was approved 'bY unanimous voice vote .
I L :S:)SDR 10-77 (Lamb Weston)
A request, Hoffman Engineering for site plan andA ` ec,-
by H �, arc��it
w of a pr ?osed 7 500 s . ft . addition to an ex-
. t�.�ra�. review 7, 500 �.
g fisting building at 6600 S .W. Hampton r' �.
• I`L Site Review
A. Staff Report
Read by Daniels
B. Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval with the following condo-
bons ;
1. A non-remonstrance agreement be filed with the
city r
city recorder for the improvement of S .W, Hampton;
Street ,
rj
.,... ... ... ,,. A:: ,.,. . .,i,. ., ......... . ...: „,IV,•. ,,..•,, v•... .... ... ..... ,.,. ... .,. ...,., .,........ ...... .. ... ,t k i!"' vfU'4+.t41'.11
' 1
1
' I rl'� lf' i ue!„ ....1, _„ l,A..•e ;.a,MI,,r1A•, ,w „...a, .• ..,..
1 i...A., 1.a.,—A�...g.{.MJrv.r i.l>`W......rvllW.. .N 11 I+ 1.,,.•.A..G»rw...ujl.,1
MINUTES
r
TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
April 12, 1977 5: 30 P.M.
age 2
2. S .W. 68th Avenue be improved and a street tree
program be initiated (matching the standards ap-
proved for the Farmers Planned Development) .
This improvement should be in conjunction with
the development of the Farmers Planned Develop-
ment .
3. An irrigation plan be received.
C. Applicant' s 'Presentation
Tom Whittaker, architect, presented pictures of the
site and explained the Project .
D. Board Discussion:
o Discussion on S .W. Hampton Street and S .W. 68th.
Cook moved and Olson seconded for approval of the
site plan
� ••..
with the staff recommendations. 1
•
The motion was approved by unanimous voice vote
\ ;4 ' II . Architectural Review:
o Tom Whittaker, architect, described specifications,
as per architectural plan, with colors to match the
existing building,
Olson moved and Hammes seconded to approve the are;hitec
' tural plan as submitted.
The motion was approved by unanimous ous voice vote
5 . 3 SDR 8-77 (Canterbury Square)'
request by Kolve and K - erg for site plan• A r�t,�q � ettleb p and arc1�
. P
tectural review of a
Proposed l t 'I(Jt�� sq. f t . addition at
14363 S .W. Pacific Highway.
1
Site Review
r
' A. Staff (Report
0 Read by Daniel ;
!
' n
r
l
M ....v, .... ,I 1. 4 .i ..., ..i.,. .-] ..e ,+ter .«....1,.✓<.-.,u{I+l- n,y.,, .:..A G, .-c:sr. r....:i . ,lY..11,....... M.
MINUTES
TIGAS"•, J DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
April 12, 1977 - 5: 30 P.M
Page
0 Staff presented a memo with regard to past Plan-
" ning Commission 'actions regarding Canterbury
r Square.
B. Staff Recommendations
omm
Staff recommends y
ends approval with the following cond -
tions
J . 1. lighting Thai, a li g htin system be installed in the pedes-
trian walkway ,
2. That a landscape plan and irrigation plan imple-
mentating Finding #5 be submitted (subject to •
staff approval)
•
3, That a landscape plan for Canterbury Square (in-
,
corporating all Planning Commission conditions)
be submitted prior to occupancy of the new addi-
tion ,
•
C. n
Applicant' s Presentation : ,•
0
o Jerry Kolve, applicant, Presented y 9 pp p ted the plan and
discussed the staff conditions,
' ' o Don K et tle-,hur
g, applicants protested ted Staff Recom-
1
• mendations #2 a nd 3.
•
D" Commission Discussion :
,
1/ ti o McMonagle suggested that an island be placed on
the end of the parking rows rather than 'a long
center strip
' is
Hammes moved and Cook seconded ion: r
approval with the
following conditions :
1. That the planter be installed in the last two
parking stalls
2. That a lighting system be installed in the pedes-
triad walkway
3, That s, � a concrete e from walk be installers �r n the pav-
ing in front to the paged area in back.
M � .
•
...r..,,,.... u-«k,,.... ...a.,...n!..e_,.ua.... ._... .w.,. . i..a x....,.uura....z.e r .rll.. +
MINUTES
TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
April 12, 1977 5: 30 P.M.
page
4 . That the sidewalk area in front of the new store in-- !. ''''
�"
i
corporate a landscape bed and possible street furnw j
ture (subject to staff review)
Cook moved and Olson seconded to amend the motion to
state: No building permit be issued until staff re-- , ` .
searches the conditional use permit landscaping require-
ments vidence that all �.,
conditions fof the Conditional Use Perm applicant to submit evidence were satisfied.
Cook moved and Olson seconded for a second amendment that
a detailed. landscape plan for the entire site be submit .-
ted to the Design Review Board prior to issuance of oc
cupancy permit . ,
o McMonagle e
asked that s taff investigate past condi-
tional use before the next meeting.
HI Vote on motion with
amendments
The motion failed in a 1 to 3 voice vote, with Cook, 01- ,
son, and McMonagle dissenting.
with first motion ith fir.st amendment
, . .,. Vote on moti
.._.. w
The motion was approved by unanimous voice vote.
II . Architectural Review:
o I Tom � adna 3s architect stated that th e building would
be brick, matching the existing •,building, with a shake
roof canopy,
Olson
moved and Cook seconded to approve the architecture
r as presented.
The motion was approved by unanimous voice vote.
. 5 .4 SDI 9-77 (Burdick/`rorbes
A request by Construction Services, Inc, for site plan and
architectural review of a convenience market and office' cam-
. ' Greenburg Road and Shady Lane ,
_ i nd Shad
e� at Greenbu.
1 Site Revriew
r A. Staff Report :
a Ii
f
e u,...,1, i ' r♦• ,...:r-A,..JFl.k..v..«JU--•u..,nsr::`.0... p>•.ac..wrssdrwv;•a
MINUTES
TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD .
April 12, 1977 5 : 30 P.M“
Page 5
o Read by Daniels
B. Staff Recommendation:
recommends approval °
> Staff•... ` � �p oval with the following condi-
, tions
1. Cross easements for the joint driveway be re-
corded prior to issuance of the building permit 4`.
2 , S .W. Greenburg be improved to City standards,
with paving 32 ft . from center line and an 8 ft
adjacent `to the curb
sidewalk
3. The existing trees be incorporated into the :and--
g P
scape plan wherever possible
4 . Ever
y
be
Evergreen trees added to the rear landscape
area
5. A ma ieire e be added to the lands
pw,
landscape island by '
the service drive
G . Irrigation plan and revised. ' ,. _ ` ' ' landscape plan be
submitted prior to the building permit
7. A sigring program be established and returned to
,
Design Revie w
8 , Refuse container e c
s reened on all sides (sub-
,ect to staff approval)
C, Applicant 's Presentation ;
Harley Adams, Construction Services, explained
the
project and discussed
1 r7 Cussed the ist staff conditions.
bans.
D1 Commiss `on :
�, Discussion:
o Discussion on half-street improvement and d systems
develop ment
charge
Cook moved and Itamrnes seconded. for approval with
staff recommendations .
o .McMon•agle stated he would vote because he believed
Item #2 should be clarified ied a� the
City CounGa
l
a s
1 '4
4
...4A.,.,... « ....,..A:. « ., . ,.,u....,..+.4..__«...7..r. w.,l..... . „1. .F}.-u .:in..l.,F Lw«:.[.U:✓.1Sw.4w4FPh,.
MINUTES 1
" TIGARD, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD �•-
April 12, 1977 - 5: 30 P.M.
Page 6
The motion failed in a tie vote, with Olson and Mc-
Monagle dissenting.
Olson and Cook moved for :approval with staff recorn
mendations and that Staff Condition #2 be remanded
back to City Council . w.
The motion was approved by una. .., uoice vote.
II Architectural Review:
o 'Harley Adams stated that minor changes would be made
to the architecture plus 'a bicycle rack would be pro-
vide . Color samples were submitted.
•
Cook moved and Hammes seconded for approval as submitted.
( The motion was approved by unanimous voice vote.
a . 5 .5 SDR 11-77 (Snyder Roofing)
•
L' A request by McKenzie Engineering for site plan and archi--
tectu.ra] review of a proposed storage tank and an architec-
tural addition to a previously approved structure at 12560
S .W • Hall
I . Site Review:
A. Staff Report
b ' Daniels d R
o
, Read
, 8. Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval with the following condi-
tions:
1. Shore pine be extended around the eastern corner
of the fence
2 The planting bed be widened to a minimum of 8 ft,
C, Applicant r s Presentation:
0 Dave Welch, McKenzie Engineering, agreed to staff
conditions and specified a buff color for the
tank.
i
d' '�
•
• w .. ;_S:1/4. .1„ .41,- ,. _..raw„,w•n.:,«.i..
MINUTES
TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
April 12, 1977 - 5 : 30 D.M.
Page 2
D. Board Discussion :
Hammes moved and Olson seconded for approval with
the staff conditions
aV ,
II . Architectural Review
o Dave Welch described the canopy and submitted color
M samples .
Hammes moved and Cook seconded to approve the canopy as
•
.
pr e s
ente d
,
by unanimous voice vote .
The motion was approved
BUSINESS:
OTHER
6
OT
There being no other business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:30.
•
•
•
•
r r
i
i
W
+," ••
v _ I
' �:: «.J,.l.•w:..:.µr. tins..:,a.1.n.'.......,::..N.....+,I w..h.',,.rl,:+,uu.�uiy...w'...:nti.t4.,4+,,..J N....r.�...- ."..:,....w�.�...1»,�...AM•i+Vw......M,.k:+u..M1..f...»,....a.�F...w.:..l.J..:,,..wJ.¢..-,.n4.-.nw.....w a.,n..4z..vas.,,�+,..4._.�;,�.d::,.va+.wV.��r.n51�.,..� � .LNV
,...f...:r4w4x.N..l.Maw..,�NM",J.,,�.i.,.rd�..,..-s�.!»�.+L....ua.,w».L..L...L„n.,..-.w.✓•;:.c.�.w«..'...rwb. ..ri.k..w+u"a.w..� i.:;
CITYOFTIGARD OF
.,„
" I ,
Date V/7/77 Amount
/OA ,.dollars
Name
� � Cash { ,
AA �'•
•Address /D-r� 4 _ ' Check
fi
• d
Bl . - St,o
'�' Bus.Lic:
9 Fn g . �;.
., Plbg. EJ Pubctns, C Bike l.ic, E ; ,
. • • Elctl, Copies [ Sew„Serv, 4
Sewer Fi1ing L Fine
Assrmt. W ❑ Other 0 Zoning ❑
For: 1/45 r~ /•a ^ 1
•
Permit #
CITY OF TIGARD
By:
WI4I•CNErt PRINTING k STATIONERY
IONEg4
16376
•
� r
m I
� I
I I I
,
, • ' 4 ♦ ,
SITE DEVELOPI\IENT PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW
T
I
P.ev ev,
Site Plan
+t.- 76. r 7
• • . t° 7,. Architectural Review5',a.� „ „w
. ,, ,_w,� � Fee Received,. %r,►-�-� ; .
�� �� 4� Receipt # /&_,.
APPLI..r TOIL ' w) / _ _.,
,,r'' f ''-`" , Date Received �,2'�. /7..2 i'
Tigard Planning Commission By ,..:. ',z, t_e_ --- II "
'� 12420 SW Main St. , Tigard, Or, 97223
639-4171 f
Project Title Addition to Lamb Weston Offices Date 11':?•-Il?d March 25, '77 „
Pro
- r ec 6600 5.W. H ton Tigard, Oregon
t A d dX'e�S.
a�Ylp 9
' a
Tax Map No, 2 S' / - ,/.1 Tax Lot No. 3300-3500
Ovrxaer/Developer aft an Engineering . .
I ,
900 ♦: h Avenue, Portland Ore on Telephone 221-8811 • �
Address 9 � �. g _ f
• , � 221-8878
Owner s /,� tz Telephone
"gx�.ature ''
Win.' L. onigan for J. Clark Btllock
a DESCRIPTIOl\T OF PROPERTY ►„
Propose d Use — #B•p.zld.ings # units Sq• Ft.
office
7,550
I I
Site Size Tot. Sq. Ft. of Buildings
1 Paving _ t ox La
L andscaping se aG
in
(_.
Anticipated Development Date 5-15-77 t11,ra 10.1.77
Anticipated Development Phases
0 Val•ua ti On $320,000.00 _.� - _ u {
DO NOT wRiTE BEL Oar THIS LINE
Special Conditions Dedications
_ I' ----__. '
Bon d z na g __,, , :__,„,,_,. _ .,.., .___.....-. W
Other _ .��y.. . . ....., ..�.�,.1.. ...- ._.,_ W �. µ,w.w.w.., _...y ....,
Final Inspection ` Y �.��a�.�_... .. _...'_w._. D8 to
.�... .____.. _
r I �;
•
•tiM
I` 1w
[Page Too Large for OCR Processing]
[Page Too Large for OCR Processing]