SDR1-77 POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
[Page Too Large for OCR Processing]
v ' a
■
•
•
•
•
•
'1 ....1•...',L...w ,,'...,r„.al'uk ;r.:.....;,,'Mr,.w'b�; "i - I'; r i ,„i,'„ I.',. ,r
�. •,? uM-A- )M„�- y,.e,:.r�l�-+.,C�. a' �u�.r1.ir iS,�,:.,+.�,wM�+�ww....J�.M c,41a,«+:n z.:.-.M i.+n��r�,tir.,wi�;...�I � .K'd.r.�.��.�.•J.M. .;-"1.�N..rv�;1�,4'ai...�r,TF..a+,Jr .-.17d,`,'T.a..itiw.rv..[e�.n1•�Lry�..,.A.US»��:a+:7�..FuS.;.,y '
W N '& D ',',t,:,,,'
r
, , r 400 7 TILL fi � LS '�F
?�
Sits n�'r�lam' rxtl Re era' {SD�t 1 )
89O w IBurnm n I
F
■
.,�.4 War riai� Shop
Il y
1 �y r
•
•
•
•
li
•I
•
•
•
•
P r
•
•
a
•
I
! m
•
•
,I
•
I
, ,�
kt, ' ' ., ,
6
M
•
I
•
,
•
•
•
r
I I
•
I
I
•
r
•
I
'
it It
i
f i
pp����pdp CITY OF TIGARD
. . ,„ P. 0. Box 23557 f,
12420 S. W. Main t 4.(:),4,:11.,
97 23
r Oregon 2
Tigard, o
� g
.
f
February� 9 1977 /�� 0 '
ro
i
1
r
i
• Jerry Daniels
8950 S .W. Burnham I
{
Oregon t .
■
Tigard, re
g n 9
7223
Dear Mr . Daniels:
Please be advised that the Tigard Design Review Board at
their regular meeting of February 8, 1977 approved your request . .
for site development plan and architectural design review of a
proposed warehouse and shop at 8950 S.W. Burnham Street . This 1 ,
, approval is subject to satisfying the following conditions
.
1 . A detailed landscape plan for the entire site be
submitted (subject to staff approval) .
2 . Wheel blocks be added to all parking spaces. ''
3. Fence be sight obscuring with cedar slats .
4 . A non- remonstrance agreement bee Tiled with the City
Recorder for the improvement of S .W. Burnham.
5. Th c, landscape strip on southwest corner be widener
to 4'
6 . The parking arrangement be modified to expand the
planter bed for the existing maple tree. .
•
The architectural plans were approved as submitted. '
r If we can be of any further assistance please do not
hesitate to contact rr,e at this office.
Sincerely,
n d
. Nancy Edwards
NE:s r Assistant Planner .
•
Note The following
f oll o w in g acknowledgment must
be received by y
the
City of Tigard Within fourteen (14) days of your receipt
h of this letters F'ailure to return
this acknowledgment 0
;Y• a 1010101r
n • ) , 1
rl i tLJ f x, ., n, , xtXC>r lMrin,.+t.YtJ4lk1
• V _ ill« .
Jerry Daniels
February 9, 1977
Page 2
may result in action by the City of Tigard. 4
hereby acknowledge this letter documenting the action of the
Tigard Design Review Board. I have received and read this
letter and I agree to the decision here documented and to abide ',
by any terms and/or conditions attached.
^.,
Signature
Dat
•
4
•
I .
. . . . . . isionlir
4'
1•
.,i .,t, .. ..._ ... .w.. .. ,..-.,,. -.e :',I._ ", x,.1.". ,.#.,,.,.. .,.., ,.,i., ..«:i--✓.{..:... .'1L...-..,,"......x.A;.r .nw.oti:.w.au....... w,,.,., .F ..... . ..dl_...� ,,,..4".IIf•...... ,......��„i,11 i' ' r
Y MINUTES
TIGARD SITE DEVELOPMENT AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
. February 8, 1977 -- 5 : 30 P.M.
.1 ,1
City Hall
� 1
- ' ( 12420 S .W. Main Street Tigard,, Oregon
1 . CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 5 :30 P.M.
by Chairman McMonagle .
' 2. ROLL CALL: Present : Olson, McMonagle , Cook, Hammes, Goldbach
Staff : Edwards and Daniels .
kw,
3. MINUTES : Cook moved and Hammes seconded that the minutes of F �,
January 25, 1977 be approved as submitted. ' ,+
4. COMMUNICATION: None
5. DESIGN REVIEW: .
V,5.2.,... DR 1-77
A request by Daniels, Wiggins and Daniels Construction for
site plan and architectural review of a proposed warehouse
and shop at 8950 S .W. Burnham Street . (Wash. Co Tax Map
2S1 '2 AD, Tax Lot 2600) . '
A. Site Development.. to ment Plan
P EI ,
1 . Staff Report : Read by Edwards
2 . Staff Recommendation: ,
Staff recommends approval with the following condi'��
tions ;
1 A detailed landscape plan for the entire site be
submitted (subject to staff approval) , 1
2, The southern curb cut be eliminated and put into , ' ,,/
landscaping and the northern curb cut be widened /I,
to a maximum of 241 without causing removal of the r, ‘ i
8 ' caliber birch f
I ,
3 . Wheel blocks be added to all parking spaces,,
4, The 1,andscape strip in the west setback area
be widened to 4' : i ,, 1I
I
I /,,,
h
.
5. Fence be sight obscuring with cedar slats . l '4,,
C: A nonremonstrance agreement be filed with the l 'I'.■
•
City Recorder for the improvement of S ,W0 r. i rnhar: ; ,,
Edwards explained difficulties in reviewing this site plan
because of poor building arrangement and lack of landscap.e ��
detail. ! d'
3: ca i n
A 1 t5 i�re8 i
e ty.{tiy�
1P
i
•1
• j 11111111/111111111111111111111111111MMINEMEINNIMIIMAINIMMINIMUMMEMEMIN
J ..,.. .. ,.,..a...,._.........,.,..,,:,,•rIJP t. .i,,,, ,,,,,,,,,w,,.,.. Ml.w._.. ,...i..:U....:x..1t.AU... .1...,.,+,...,_JI.._.,.u.tc: e,
/+14....l.Ll.- '.,f..:Y.4,i'•,.;:.1..1. -. '.)1,.;5"M:'Jr.L•-�=Y;:::;1,
p D h
TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
I February 8, 1977 ..
Page 2
Jerry Daniels exp laexplained site p lan
, ,
•.
-•. access via 16 ' driveway
t _ building location
o Cook questioned the 16 ' driveway .
J .
4. Commission Discussion and Action:
o J. Daniels explained its status:
„ LF o; McMonagle questioned parking backout .
0 Edwards said that it meets the Tigard Municipal Code
�f
r Edwards ex pla i ed t hat ''a
snore favor able approach
would be to amend the conditional use permit and
reorient' the building toward either S .W. Burnham
Street or the 16 ' driveway .
o J. Daniels explained current circulation pattern .
o Edwards proposed handling the access for both this
lot and the adjacent lot under ownership of Daniels,
Wiggins and Daniels when it developes,
o Cook proposed relocating the two parking spaces on
the south side of the maple tree so the planter
island can be expanded so as to provide for a better ., .
rooting pattern.
o McMonagle stated that the curb cut problems should
be handled at the tune' an L. I .D: is formed for the
improvement of S.W. Burnham or at such time as a
development proposal is submitted for the adjacent
parcel under Daniels, Wiggins and Daniels ownership ,
o Olson questioned why a minimum 2' "wide landscape area.
'... o Edwards responded t hat it was to b e supplemented by
2' from adjacent
properties and to provide screening.
o McMonagle proposed a 3 ' wide landscap e
bed:
o Olson moved and Cook seconded to approve the plan
with staff conditions 1, 3-6 and u
7. '.be planting; on southwest corner be Widened '
to 4 ' parking' modification,
8. Tho parking arrangement be modified- to..,ex. gip_
€� � end
1 p .
p
the planter bed for the existing maple tree.
the motion was
'I approved by a unanimous'mous woice vote,
" 1 II
11
1� .1
. '
•
...,.. '. .'i' 1 .. • . ....s..... .a.•• 'H...i.r.,,.l.l .l„ ..4J ..1 'la,- ..i.,4+w.-.,...lnr..-. .•..1..• i,'IJ,:,. ....:..1. J. a5. ,A.JMIJ i.. ..,
..,.....»._ ... ,j....di l t,. ...,•. 4,t -1 ut .I.,..,... .I.,.., .w ... «....w«.,...,.-...-._•.....,.„ 4 ..a...,.,--....... ..,...,- .,... .. ....... .. ,.h.. w. •.... a, «»,...•IY ..ru, nu
MII', TES
TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
�
, C.�
February uary 8, 19 7?
Page 3
B. Architectural Design Review:
u
1 . Applicant 's Presentation
J. Daniels proposed a "Mitchell Type" metal building.
"
o Rain drains will dump directly into storm drain.
:2, Commission °Discussion and Action:
Hammes moved and Olson seconded to approve the
•,.' architectural plans as submitted.
•
The motion was approved by a unanimous voice vote.
6. OTHER BUSINESS : • ,
6.1 Discussion on code requirements l
o Staff explained the current code requirements for pax},king
lot landscaping. , .
o Cook proposed staggering larger planter beds rather than
2 ' on each side of a property' line.
o McMonagle' proposed amending the code to provide flexibility
where the 70' on center landscape beds can be aggregated. to �,.
provide larger planter beds .
o McMonagle stated a need for a purpose for the, landscaping
requirements .
o Cook proposed „an average of 4' " where 2' is ,flow required
and to add "or the equivalent area" to the 70' oft center;'
requirement
7. ADJOURNMENT:
i
j r
Y
I >'
J There being no other business the meeting was adjourned at t 00.
•
; I
i
Ir
•
rAl J � I) 4 J 1 y. . 1 l• I " ..,Ins . • {•
'I 4q r 11 j•'
U .' _
n w 1 .... :.,..,i,1..1:,..i :j....:. ,: ,. ..z..,.._.a..,'...; ....,...a.,,..u,._...i u..-,v..._._4iL....x:.,t1 a»....,.... ,.... -_.. ._,..,..,»_.......»4.:..._.:..h._..w,.,...a.r.,,,.»n,-ta..«.+a,:it.:....s..n..x..L:c=...C7:.....yw..«,,r.-.n'.jll,:..:u.r6-.,.,,,..,,.L., ,»...,.♦,_.•.a..r.:i..l_w!t,_..,..,,Js,.bT..i«:-1:.:;....'.F'Sk.J:,IIXx..°t '
+• iI
) 1
I•. STAFF REPORT !
I ', ' TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD I .
February 8, 1977 - 5: 30 P .M. i
Tigard City Hall
12420 SW. Main Street -- Tigard, Oregon
I "
i
b �7
DOCKET: SDR 1 7 .
4 REQUEST A request, for site plan and architectural review of a pro-
posed warehouse and shop w
• • LOCATION: 8950 S .W. Burnham (Wash . Co . Tax Map 3,1 2AD, Tax Lot 2600) .
, .
APPLICANT: Daniels, Wiggins and Daniels,D an� e s Construction on
.
- ,-.r:., I . BASIC FACTS : T .
1 . The site is zoned M-4 (Industrial Park) and designated
. Commercial-Industrial on the NP, I
" „ 2 . In June of 1970, the Tigard Planning Commission approved, a
. ' conditional use permit for a general contractor ' s office and
warehouse for this site with the following conditions : 1
•
. . ;
1 . That the development must be in accordance with the r" \
. ' set of plans submitted, but with the following addi-
w,
• � ' � � � � tion..,, which must b i
e� made prior to the application �, �
. for a building permit
a. the zoning ordinance requires that "all areas
used for the standing and maneuvering of vehicles
' .5 . . be improved according to the same specifications
as required for City streets" ; this is to be .
. shown on the plans, with the exception that the , .
rear 71 ' of the property may be planted or im-
proved to lesser standards, such as with gravel .
' b y the ordinance also provides that approved outside
;,S , storage areas must be screened from view sight-obscuring o f .all
adjacent properties by a f er e,
.
not less than six feet in height and/or by sight--
I
this obscuring landscaping; this screening must he i
detailed on the plans No storage shall be per-
.,
mitted above the height of the fend
11;° 4, 3, SW. Burnham Street is designated a collector street on
A, ,- NP I ,, The Tigard Community Plan asks that access he con -
' trolled wherever possible on collector streets ;
II , FINDINGS : I
I
01 1 . The applicant x s requesting review of a
new warehouse and
shop . The plan submitted corresponds with the p1.an approved
,`' by
the Plannin
Commission as a condition .of the -conditional--
�use permit ,
•
i
0 ,
r
I . ,
/ li i ', eta , 4� 1 I I hr I I ,f
Illr1d 401 .
.r.l. ✓.,r.. l , .....w..l._..a .. ...._,«..._..Ar i.._x.. .r4.v.M.......r.....1'„ ...M.r.r.J.,,,wtr.L,,.a.l. ... ... ......,a..N,1,.uAl,-R.r.,.,..1..,.•,....{YtY,.i4ua.:t.„WI a....Ir t...A.u.G.:w.'..-w'{. ✓H,id..,+..n,.«..rA.J.n,.u .,r.::r.:ll....,nr...C..,..«.:r,.+,u..rY.'—Y......,.w:yin,.Mnr.Jh.r.+.rirrrl•w,...MR.7.}Lf�,4::y.
: . STAFF REPORT
TZGARb DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ,
�� Ir
1:eb r.ua ry 8, 1977
Page 2
2. Because of building deadlines the applicant was . unable to
submit 'a complete landscape plan. A landscape plan showing
plant locations, names and specification should be sub- , .
,mitted ; for either Design Review Hoard or staff approval .
. i .
3. The two existing curb cuts are shown to be 18 ' wide.
Design
. Review policy has been to bring curb cuts up to city stand- !'
p
ar d..7 -- 30 ' whenever possible and to limit the number of curb r, .
cuts on collector streets. • 'This site could therefore be i `
brought up to code by eliminating the .'southern most curb
cut and widening the northerly curb cut to 30 ' with 24 ' of
paving. One item to be considered is a 8" cal, birch which
. in on its exact location might be in the wa, If 1.
\ - depending x might way. ,
possible the driveway width should be adjusted to allow the
tree to remain. / .
I . 4. Existing landscaping is fairly sparse, additional plantings
should be added and shown on the new landscape plan. �`
a r), ,s ,
, 5. A narrow 4 ' wide planting strip is shown between the park `
ing spaces next to the existing building. Wheel blocks },' ,
/
should be added to these parking stalls in order to protect
•
the landscape strip.
6 Four parking spaces are specified on the western corner of ,' ,
the lot . Since this parking is in the setback a 2 ' land- c
scape strip (specified, on the plan) is necessary. However
/, / a 2 ' strip is too narrow for any worthwhile type of land- .*
i scaping,. This strip should be enlarged to 4--5'' with wheel t ' 1r
. blocks provided in the parking spaces , '
7. No details have been shown for screening the outside storage
area. The fence shown on the plan should be sight obscuring. 1 .
M
8 . S .W . Dur.nham is presently in deteriorating condition and f .
in need of improvement.
III . STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS : 1'
i
Staff recommends approval with the following G
d J t i C x s
: :,
A
. 1 , ._ • .retailed landscape plan for the entire site be su'�mi,-tted
(subject to staff approval) , ,.
4 ,
2; The southern curb cut be eliminated. and put into landscaping
and the northern curb cut be widened to ''a maximum cic,f 24'
without causing removal of the b' caliber birch, . .
3, Wheel blocks be added to all parking spaces
,
r
I
e
^ Y^ ' * ^ ,a
.,, ,. , II ,
1 1'' I
1 ■r ,.., ...�,,..,,..Il; I ;l„-..«.. ' raa'.,;,,..s.,;,...i...r„ ,__,„„._u_„,s,„.r,,0.,..,r,.....«..,,..n., ..,....I_.,.,....».,ih,,.w..«Id«J+;a.i,-,...,.,..,...c1,w SkJ,I,..o.,,..-1-1,.,c .,,,,, + .a.:_ ,,,::9L.4.,:w.,,......M..,,,,,,,.to....:.:.,,i.:.,Y +.
f, . n i
I
STAFF REPORT tl •
I T I GARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
It February 8, 19'77
Page 3 �
4 . The landscape strip in the west setback area be widened i
to 4 ` • .
•
•
5. Fence be sight obscuring with cedar slats . 1
6 . A non-remonstrance agreement be filed with the City
• M Recorder for the improvement of S.W. Burnham.
,
.
f
1
I
,
I
440„°.
tlil."1:1. i.,
P
•I
•
I I
1.
1
I I
1
re
( f 1 ■ �I )b; AI 1
•
• , .. ..M ...,.... ._......... w_,,,,1.._ 7. .a.,....... rgxr.x>+.u.,e:..xMtF¢.....d{,,
i d
♦
1
1 e
January 24; 1077
.
l�
.
I
•"V
i
Qera1 Daniels
Daniels, Wiggins & Daniels, Contractors
y' 8950 S.W. Burnha
Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: SDR 1-77 ,
Dear Mr. Daniels,
This is to inform you that your application for Site
s� l , Plan and Architectural Review of �a now warehouse and shop
�a9� ! ; has been rejected until the proposal can be heard by the
Tigard Planning t OMM i.ssion b
Please inform us if you wish t ,s, fee returned or Y
retained for later resubmission. It you have any questions;
please do not hesitate to call me.
Sincerely,
Nancy Edward
Assistant Planner
,
♦ a
.....'� n _ ♦ o n , ��' a n
hn M to .
gyp.
a. t .
, 0.t.
1,
.
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW
Site Plan Review ;:`
.................. File No. ^�' ��
. Architectural, Review �J �{r
_.._ Fee Received r.
APPLICATION Receipt # V ,
Date Received 'a '
1
Tigard Planning Commission
12420 SW llain St. , Tigard, Or. 9721,3 B - o u
639--4,171
�
Proosed. Building for .
Project Title DaTd.els, Wiggins & Daniels, Contractors, Date Fi1ed 1 `�1 77 4 .
Project 'Address 8950 SW Burnham. ..
Tax Map No. - 25.11 ::, 2AD Tax Lot No. _2600 .,,
Owner/Developer Da niels ns & Dan iel
, C oltxxao t oxs .�.. _ ,
Address 8950 SW Burnham (Papa Box 23454) ..._. Telephone -6881 _N ,_W _
ii wl�til+y�r.l
'. Owner's 9.f�` ,'ti � ,,
-- Tele hone
Signature � __
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
Pro osed Use #J3u .1_din # Units o S . Ft.
• Office 1 1 1288 Exist .n f .
• VJa:ehcttse & Shop 1 2 60 New
Site Size 249088 sq.. ft,--.56 acres Tot. Sri Ft. of Buildings 7048 . .
•
' Sq. Ft. of Paving ___15)790___ Sq. Ft. of Landscaping 1250
, Anticipated Development Date Fobru,ry1977
Anticipated Development Phases 1 _ _
Valuation $60,000.00
b. .
DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS T S LINE
..�...:�
Special Conditions -- Dedications
Bonding _ �.�.�... .' �_:. ....' •
Other
Final inspectiGl'a. by ; Date
,
..,,,,ww,drom•••••••■••*1
.1 .
, . . . . .
. ., . . .
. . . .
.., . . . . , .
. .
. .1 .
, . .
. ,
, . .
, , 1
. . ,
' ' ' ' • :""'''' '411'■, 11 :-V: c"*"1"c"', - '-,, c."""4,'rc.;\-\:511r-7f.'"-....7. ,:.: ' : • --A-7-3,4A
115 , : , ::
. ,
!!!
„' • 1-pci'l Ct.?;:•44'kcitri. Vit
-CTuXoe-N,r_Lcz-c\c,
44
iN7v1 21. -3.0— -!(-2(-11 ti 5TX3
-11qt.
•
11\5•Ch
07
44 t
■,••••••,
;A
[Page Too Large for OCR Processing]