Loading...
SDR8-76 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. • _ _ _ . u II W t IL aaL.h W:i.reA i t wa Ct IA' k�laa- 4..,r..�l +..SY..n1s:�ui....,.,.lu:iro�a'iv.;;r.«:u,w w`4r.s.4.-.:..wd,:.++IR...;J;s.?.;-4 , `,BISHOP OFFICE UILUIi4 .r ■ t • ` ,' I 'SiteDevelop erit,ievew• ( '�' . . ' � :i ' - r ._t t.1♦ . I � • • • I I t • I I w • I I l , v • I I I t 1 I I 1 I i I I I , yy I f I I II L... II `,. „. ...�., ^� T n A ....... .p i ' ept rmber 1,7', 1976' ' ' A . - ,. Wilbur Bishop 10590 S.W. Cook Lane ° Tigard, Oregon 9722 , , Y ' , .',I an in receipt of your .,titter 60 September 160 '1976, ��� agree With, ��ur statement �p s of plants , . . , , proposed for the parking lot,,on SW Conn ereia1 Street do not necessarily require an, irrigation system. I can agree , Q plan, with der- _ � � � to� a��.� ��'� the� � the� '��� standing that you 'will attend to the watering needs of these plants during unusually' dry periods. Sincerely, Bolen Richard 1 r� � planning Director M w i ' " p r i i r. , F i` I i i h n , R , 1 �( 4 d m i Y WILBUR BISHOP 10590 SW Cook Lane ! 4 Tigard, Oregon Mr. Richard Bolin Planning Director Cit y of Tigard Tigard, Oregon Dear Mr. Bolin: Following discussions with any architect, Tom Whittaker and our general contractor Reimers & Jollivette, we have found that with regard to the landscape plan approved by, the City for the designated parking area across the street from our building, under construction at 12290 S.W. Main Street, that: 1) Installation of a hose bib for watering the type of. low lying shrubbery to,be planted, here would, not be necessary for its growth and maintenance. 2) To install a hose bib in this location is prohibitive cost wise as it would require a separate water meter plus the (; crossing of Commercial Street to connect to water lines, or a full crossing of SW Main Street to connect with the water meter in front of the building. Estimated costs for either of these two options range between $750 to over $1,000. 3) I would be willing to sign a performance agreement, in lieu R of the water hose bib, guaranteeing that the landscaping on parking this , ark, a.n g area would be maintained d. at` standards required be the City of Tigard, You can consider the signature of this letter as my agreement to maintain the landscaping in accordance to the City l s requirements If you need and further information on this matter, please let me know. Cordially yours . / ,• f Y Wilbur Bishop , ' (1L. \ • cc: Torn Whittaker ' I i • r ,, , ~ ......w.,_..-....., _, ........ .,.,.. _..,.._,,,..,.-..,...-,.,u�. „_ ».,_«a_. .......».....,... ...,.-,....-.....,.....,...,. . _..-_,,....4....,», ,.s.d.».. .._,.....a».J..e,..4,_......-.'w,.,,,r. .,...........4,..u.....,. ',I'..,..,.,LJ:.».«,.....u,..:.+e.._....,..-w,... n,.....,,._.....u4..,,,,.Ltd. i,«w.te«a..,;l..m yrx �« 1 t , jGARD . CITY OF TIGARD L �kQOrrorAtto tA► P. O. Box 23557 12420 I rY Tigard, Oregon 97223 April 20, 19 7 6 �;I \/E A 1 Mr. Wilbur Bishop TAP .. 1(1/4:1P:') 10590 SW Cook Lane � Tigard, Oregon 97223 C1 � Reference: File No. SDR 8. 76 Dear Mr. Bishop: Please be advised that the Tigard Design Review Board, at their regular meeting of April l3 1976, considered your submission of site plan and architectural design for a proposed commercial build- T, ing on the south side of Main St. at the railroad tracks. Your site plan was approved, subject to the following conditions: , 1. One parking stall be removed to facilitate maneuvering in the parking lot; 2. Landscaping plan for the lot across Main St. be submitted to staff for approvals Your architectural design was approved as submitted. ' Sincerely, Dick Bolen Planning Director DB:pt Note: the following acknowledgment must be received by the City of Tigard within fourteen (14) days of your receipt of this letter. Failure to return this acknowledgment may result in action by the City of Tigard. T hereby acknowledge this letter documenting the action of Tigard � Design Review Board. �vedd:ato 'read and/or agree a�.d I have received to the decision(s) here documented and abide by any conditions attached.' signature ( 402 da,"e , . Official cc: Building f '°1 , II MINUTES Tigard Site Development Plan & Architectural Design Review Board '' April 13, 1976 - 5:00 p.m.s General Telephone Building 12460 SW Main St. , Tigard, Oregon . ' 1. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order by Chairman g y McMonagle at 5:10 p.m. ' , 2. ROLL CALL: Present: McMonagle, Olso n, Hammes, Cook; staff: Bolen n APPROVAL E MINUTES t 9, 3. VALO The e rr�inu�es of the 3/23/76 meeting were .. approved as submitted. , 4. COMMUNICATIONS: No c _ 1 , 5. DESIGN REVIEW: f 5.1 SDR 7-76 (Jerry's Barber Shop An. appeal a' s eal of a previous �; ` architectural approval by the Board on 3/23/76) ' , A. Architectural Design Review 4 , , 1. Applicant's Presentation ; o Charlotte Olson abstained from taking" action on this item and presented the design, materials. and colors to the Board. o Cook moved to approve the architectural plan and materials and colors as submitted. r o Hammes seconded. o Motion passed by majority vote, Olson abstaining 5.2 SDR 8-76 (Bishop Main St. Office Building) A proposed commercial building which will stand in the place off` two dilapidated wooden structures on the south side of Main St. at the railroad tracks A. Architectural Design Review 1. Staff Report and Recommendation 1 o Bolen presented the staff :� s i a � i i� d n s and a rec . p � g ox�mendation for denial, of the parking area plan. , 2i Applicant's Presentation o Tom Whitaker, Iproject architect, presented the site P lan and • erformed a demonstration with 1 h D .i. ..... ... ...... ......,.,»_ .., ,, .. ....,...._...,-«...-.. ,.. ......,..,.._,.....�`», ,. ..,n+',. .:.N.:G. ...ai..,x.. .s, ,4„. ».;...;pie,..lti.,::..:.+•�.a,n.tcr:',r • page 2 DRB Minutes 4/13/76 scale model cars of how the parking lot would • 1'. function. He Stated that, making 4 maneuvers, a car could turn around in the parking lot and exit in a forward motion. 3. Board Discussion and Action . O The members spent considerable time discussing • ` how the p arYin g arrangement cou ld function better. » Everyone concurred that the best arrangement would be a drive-through into the Savings and Loan parking lot at the rears h o Cook moved that the site plan be approved with the condition that one parking stall be removed to facilitate maneuvering in the parking lot ��ra and that the landscaping for the lot across , Main St. be submitted for staff approval. o Seconded by Hammes. . o Motion passed by unanimous vote of all members present. B. Architectural Design Review 1. Applicant's Presentation o Whitaker presented the building design. ` 2. Board Discussion and Action •• o Hammes moved that th e buildin g desi gn be approved o� e d , as submitted. o Seconded (Olson) . o Motion passed by unanimous vote of all members pre 'snt 5.3 SDR 5-76 (Carpenter Apartments) A request by Gordon Carpenter to construct a 32 unit ` apartment complex on a 2.83 acre parcel on SW 98th St. , south of Greenburg Rd, and directly north off` SW Scott Ct. .� y .� Plan Review• , A. Site Development Pl xis. 1. Staff Report and Recommendation o Bolen presented the staff report with a re- commendation for denial • • ,....,,,.4.,.•1 , .,,n.. ,..,',.,_'. .:. ._..:', :.._._,.«.:I...............I+.-...,.«........:..' .._,.'... .;.,.a.A+.:... 1.-..., ...,k. .,..,......r.._.. .. _......,r.a.........x«4,.w-w......, ,..«........-.,.+......,,..i......-m..-.... ..- .w..n...... ...«...• .. ,.. », , M apt (r;I page 3 DR.B Minutes 15 II, 4/13/76 2. Applicant's nt � Presentation ta +io n o Mr. Carpenter presented his proposal to build 32 apartment units and stated that he planned to take into account the existing trees on the site as sttaff had requested. 3. Board Discussion and Action • . � 0 McMonagle said tha t his p artner had had some business dealings with Mr. Carpenter a nd he 9 there- • fore, would abstain from taking part in this item. o Cook said that, in that Mr. Carpenter recognizes the staff concern that as many trees as possible' be saved on this site and that the plan presented . must be redesigned in order to do that, the pro- ,' ject was not to the point of completion where the Board was able to respond to the submission.. o Cook moved that the submitted plan be denied, • o Olson seconded and the motion passed by unanimous, • vote of the members present and voting. 5.4 SDR 9-76 (Van Lom_Kraxberger/Englewood Apartments) A request by the Van Lom-.raxberger Partnership to con- struct 50 apartment units on a 4.96 acre parcel on SW Scholls Ferry Rd. at SW Springwood Dr. in the Englewood ' Planned Development. A. Site Development Plan Review 1. Staff Report and Recommendation ", o Bolen presented the staff findings and recommended denial of the submitted plan. , 2. Applicant's Presentation Lom presented the, project. ,. He stated o Mr. Van � p P � that the staff's concern over the two story apartments violating the privacy of the back '' yards of the adjoining single family dwellings was not an issue because of the setback distance., of the apartments from the property line. Re- . garding the staff concern for the pool and recreation building and area adjacent the single family homes, he said that this area could be moved further to the north and east and near the apartment structures. • • . .....,:,.,., ',' '.,.' _'.;:.. ..,.r r.. .'.,..,. u.. i.,..s .,. .., ,....,.f.,..»,d, .,..... . ,.... .. ........ ...«. u.i...,....,.w,.,.,.,....,+I,., ....w.,,, .....,-.........,....—..... w.. w .,...+.e.mrrl,..„.. ...,a...w. 'v wva..: ._a..u..:,.:. • / paged DRB Minutes 4/13/76 3. Board Discussion and Action o Olson asked if the plan could be approved with the submitted relimin p ary landscape • plan` o Bolen said d t� a sa that it c o . u.ld th w the condition ondi�- ,ian that staff Rpprove the final submitted land- . , soaps plan. o Cook moved for approval of the submitted plan, with the condition that the pool be kept 40 ft from the fence adjacent the single family area; that the area between the pool and the single family area be adequately screened; that a 6 'ft. fence be provided adjacent the single family homes; and that a 10 ft. easement be provided • •1 f along the Scholls Ferry right-of-way, to accorruno-- date the bicycle path. o Hammes seconded the motion and it passed by unanimous vote. B. Architectural Design Review 1. Applicant's Presentation • o Mr. Van Lam presented the design of the buildings. o McMonagle asked what the siding material would be. a Mr. Van Lam replied that rough sawn plywood would be used with kerb' edging on all sides. tI 2. Board Discussion and Action o Cook moved that the building architecture be accepted as subm.ittei.. o (,'lson seconded and the motion passed by majority vote of all members present. 6. OTHER BUSINESS: None 7. ADJOURNMENT 8:10 p.m. ti STAFF REPORT Tigard Site Development &: Architectural ,Design Review Board 1 April 13, 1976 ' SDR 8-76 PROJECT REVIEW (Bishop Main St. Office Building) A proposed commercial building which will stand in the place of two dilapidated wooden structures on the south side of SW Main St. at the railroad tracks. STAFF FINDINGS 1. On March 16, 1976,. the Planning Commission approved a set- back variance for this location. The variance allows the building to be within 1 '6" of the property line. In this case the property line is 8' behind the sidewalk edge and the applicant proposes to landscape this portion within the public right-of-way. 2. The landscaping shown adjacent the building and parking area is more than adequate; however, some plant types and plant spacings have been specified which will result in over- ,, • • crowding as the plants continue to grow. A=Lso, the choice ; of low plantings (Mugo pines) at the rear of the parking lot , could be altered for higher growing evergreen plants which would tend to screen the view from Main St. of the rather unsightly rears of the businesses backing up to the rail- road right-of-way from Commercial St. 3. There are two telephone poles along the railroad right-of- way which this plan requires moving. One of these poles is proposed to be placed within the sidewalk area. It seems more advisable to move this pole approximately 4 to 5 ft. back from the curb line and into the landscaped, area • to avoid conflicts with pedestrian traffic' 4. The principle area of staff concern in relationship to this 1 project the configuration of the parking area shovn adjacent the building. The Board will note that a parking area is also specified directly across Main. St. adjacent the Commercial St. right-of-way. The parking area adjacent the building is extremely restricted for turnaround traffic movements. This narrow width could easily be accommodated • if a drive-thru arrangement were possible, such as into the • Savings & Loan parking lot. However, as designed; the parking lot requires cars to turn around in a curb-to-curb' width of 29 ft. The standard for a parking lot wit- i, one access point is 43 ft. , this space -therefore 'being deficient in width by 14 ft. It is unfortunate that an access was ' not attainable from the Savings & Loan Bank adjacent his property, In the staff's judgment, without drive-thr k' tall can. be provided in ; access, a maximum of 3 parking stalls p the 35 ft. width available. These would be 30 degree '.angled ( i i 7 r, •:.>ti«-, w.1 +:.:'1..".A.7..lf«n.U,:-` .:li.,^J.L.....ar..F»ti„C:,31(;.`..,,,..,.,.$wl,.»...,t:4ti..'Ml,f„kX.....,aEAt„',;.I`Yi..HJ�iNr:.Fl.:«xwik'.t4n+:-:1»r.Ni.`.rrtf t+ s.:w.AAtu4"M... e 4 page 2 DRB Staff Report 4/13/76 stalls having a channel width of 17'4" and an aisle width of '12' for a total of 29'4". This standard does meet the newly-revised parking standards for the City of Tigard. The end of the parking lot would then be used for a turn- ` around space and no parking would be possible in that area. In staff's judgment, this use requires 10 parking spaces and this additional space must be provided off site in the area proposed across Main St. , adjacent Commercial St. The submitted plan shows five parking stalls. If the ?: ard • 4 concurs with staff that a maximum of 3 parking stalls are possible adjacent the proposed building, then an additional 3 stalls must be provided in the area adjacent Commercial St. In this parking area staff would recommend a drive- thru arrangement employing angled, stalls along the west property line (railroad right-of-way) . In this way, several more spaces could be accommodated with little asphalt . 5. No landscaping or irrigation plan has been ,submitted °for the parking area adjacent Commercial St. r • I I II I a • 1 , i I I i 4 ' ' r r, , . . ■ 1 1 6 Y x .! ,,1. w l. ,,..,IL.a ..t■.,.w.4:4,t...N..«.....r.a�..t,.w,,...,xC. .....e»{,...aac..7 , t.. .. ,m».:».,.,«;w_.._,,... ..»�r<+.,.w l.A..a...w'a1.«...,.;»...1»:,lal.,,. ..«.�.. x,,.e.,tYa+. ,s.-_..,»C..,»... .......,,,.»a....a� M. «t....... ,.,,-•,.a.�,...a...._M 1,.....,.. .,...,,.,.N_ ..»1� .�.. ..S'ti.».,1 v,i r ,.•.Ja'',u.J.- �'i,rle' '�.1 "Y„5.,.�:.^ L AJ«;;:s ',f=t i� , p 1 N t.. . ' I '..4. ■ SITE .CPC 1T PLAN ,! D. DESIGN REVIEW , S .fiSite Plan Review I llrc .litectural Review ' ' �1PPL;CC �°I J�J 1 rile e • ,� �f'y'fyf i,,' 'w P �A,h ....; lANo..+gIrWUY1Mb1'8Y4Lo, YrA.wrY�eNyu+rM .N. r �;t,x c, ).r%%''.',.r t,,.1 d —'.CJ-�7'� , ■ „ .�Y.tl+ „es- ' fiec..e,z�P'.;. rr, ° t ) - ' , ' TIGI\RD PL/ANtNIP:1G CO11MISSICNNI '639-4J 7i Date Recc Iue I YY. . 3 /-- # . 12420' r 42 I S A Main' a i L n©e t, N g 4 $ ,Oregon, 97223 y .✓ d ...,,“..„;.9,,,e,/,.........., ,, .wM.WN 11YViw..044N,...IDCWNNwUW,w1.10M„V.1.01.YUiYNMgN. , . �M11 j .4 N , P r,o °e c t T i t i.,e /S 0 .A..nQN..arNNYLNIa.N C 3 04..44E7_4 C l l G�'�C: D a_�N . ;, r ci f .„ !• J Yr.NYWlwm�nr'.w+rHOMNVnw..HMly4h.�+YMW. N..wtMWe�ti(..w:MNMMa..WM.nNW ...N.� ., ,.M .. N a , M . Or..Nt � '�✓Nr 1 Ad dr e a a L. Sl� .�►�l� �»a. Pg J ie� e P � ; �� �_ C � -- r r 7"'' w wrlwYYN.iw,Ywm+N1..w++aN.+1N.., D--s—C_♦,'nt3r II 1' (�7 '`6.. P'v , .,.: ,_ • '_I "j I.NJ>J..rwWN....,. .,Y.r.rr. 4. i ..MNYwNIW..41M.Y1 �MAS.NY1 al aY.H...wa ��N.w':N°Y hn.N°M111'M+C,.t+ti F4,YWkNdk,IkwMIUIW1LLM.u.urt4,WMIRmr.wNNeJ,wWIfYW N/ ..,„ ,,......„...,4'Yl+ww:..nna,nWa.-....wV-,.......1'4trw.l..rwYblwNN+lw.0 'N' . ��pr 1`y( ( 1�- }pyd, q 1 r N { J. t '� C; 7 7/'! �1. E:r l i ti.a w:d` ) f4 ll t,d 1}1.��I �r��1 4 / i+�7�p .K/ ! Y'.j M..Yjj 4 �'�r,411 4a 9 CI, F r...-.rsNV1..eY•iNw.wroY N..+r..YWN '...DO law. LMt,......r:244∎4YJwV 4:!..iAtNNLG., 41,v(FWtlNS1aMW1:4WYM.WINIAU1kM4114. f4°.,.,.l ...WtMWC4,,,,i 4WY.M.Nren,Un.'x.NIV..1:44.Y/1'bh 11YN M„11 fCflwHal4o.4....rW,...........'soltle1..w.r. • . � ' hiai�C„ / //n per'j�'��y ry K�-1� + 1i... .4.i.1 1(r� � ..°a....„,e.s.w,,d ...Mw ,... .YYYwwN.Y1.44.w+a..4.:a'YNP.WNp.r..... ..L.P.r�Id u.14.NMYYn:.M4'..+.auMWb.iowtWY NY1(a6004uurwJ+46.0:1NSwY.......N 1.,YirrnNtioN...N+wwin 11.4.1wer 1 ' Qf' r ►2.Cj"..'� ! ' ..Ne 14,./.� /=L-U tl ! N,,e 4 waN ..iY.{.....WM.... N. IN.NNNHN.N. +�.aaa. IIMM`•U4MWY..RI^UApMN�C' 4..aWl�N'I:YYI'.JN+.WlW1.1. NNI.Y.iNkN .wWpr WiMN.h"r.Y11tA411N{aL/R1M upLM...1.,Mn1ic4lM.i1W�y4W.M/YFYNiwJ.RD,YWIN..4./NMNVNINI.AAW.ISYN...oNVH11W.1 Y 1 w�'M'�..w4M.N.�w+,YYNM+.Y.M b'�fl.N./I.YN.NrYA1.Ntidw.N�NwY1M..Nw....won..A....Iww K�.Mw..YN.hi,M+W1...MM,MAI.N4M nN1aM�NW:M�'Yw.1L+.1W.N.,...i,.+.+NW4r.'a.N�us34MMY.,.CY4:bMNYh'¢.4^M1"'1N.�.t lu'a...J.^U.SK.I.wN.UY..xaY.4,e11AlM/1'..aYf,-a'NNLh 1.IJWH4lWAp.',fW�Y.:hY utk+l,./I vNMLL+YWYw� N.w4f lHwnN.nw.........F+.......NOP.P. 1111.000.,WrN.oWYA. aNMN.i ..611•4',.4 r�y1yl..Ntl i iYW%I�.W.....UPINNNN.'.WYY',:MW/,.YNYPANUtrY1t y'ual h YVY^..,11 1SnNI,......",1 .pNMruNgst.. 41,riY .HI/ 'Y..YMNrNJ. /N./,Nw.N 3 3i'✓C► A A / / 1` � J yrf Yxe. f / G ,,Ipy , r� y' A 7 1 r oY fl?�j f°,; *'; ...r,b�, �'4j N,A.' ' 1'�._. r. ,YI •..7j �y Si.0 I (sr�� 0 .b a r. A.Gw„y I `✓ //Y YYJ�+S..L+S..� 48,,O// rl Q�f/y�j�I/� /�1�/}u. ����.. 1 b. W.}YIW.I.wLL1.wA IN. M 1+.G.rnrMI' Y 1'a.� V'x. .W�'AWYW .dtI , 16 0 j'l ►"} f,�p7�✓{/.{y� i , ��'�� 1,«k"� r:.' i C,+'.''4.K�!1,.-,,,,,' � d!1 4�,�.NN ,,,.:7, 11 1 ..�� 7 4f.., i N.F N.—. ,,44W .iNiW+NY% .NIN...It 1 _ AN.N. W .M...aHNNNJ/M..UI.NVNAkM......+I..A.AiNro:N.NwIWM ' E1nticipated Dove 1!i'pt 'ont 54�G.. aNY.rL+: /�S—� N/?7 ' ;FArt.b.a.: a1h „NtYa.;.N..,74,. u1.4.,uAN.w.....40,1.NWa.wa.u2.411.YiNxwlwmN.WN 14,0,>t+wMrNrxOodi.....41.4∎1,/,a.ra..i........Yrww:Wwiv.wi.:a..1•41.ui+ . N ' a 4+.1.4,.t 1 e C a rt F'”I �.�t r"� .'r� {{ �' �w' "'' Anticipated .o. ���/ lCh+�All".r.+aw.0 1',41 nYUw.aura,wv.rc.:waw.1.aw+...dw.rwYA.wNitwk..41 .w...kor...0,1,14•.••1.40 wa �.iu4n..:N.irw Valuation vatioCl � . IUwN....,1+/rtl.wwrMlM Yb...........Y...............N.wNO ..H .IWw.,,...N..roWNN NA—..MW..I°WNN.....—„Y.a.Nw..... A...........W..,„, 'YKANR .......„.„.„„..YCtlNMW i.. 1 DO :NOT,' WRITE 'B�'LOU THIS LINE waN.wN.�iNV1N•�NMIMda..�..v,WN.1..+..wAVwrai.ban+r.MiwN1.M� .N.tMMUWr.O./MLtYNWN.fd�Wa laar'1.aNMWN!wIWWP...NN.!.p4N,F4pp�.q�r+YW1....iMIN...i tlW4..WM>•TY.4MwN..W.I/Y.W.iilFfw..Y1YWNwaNMNWIHr11.INNMMM,IN NI..MN..�.iNM.MY...W+.11MupHNr SY��Jec 1 Conr:I tion Ded Y altnlar ° . 1 l horeeM...bbkt....x aNN MNV/NMNg MMY.°Y1.N f.NON..M.N..wkai.o.lY•A•'Na7•Yw .N�tri,wMhMNiren∎MM..1.11..r...1V'�r1.TN.MaNwTWM1r.Ntl11Rb 4 Bonding O. � ' , 1 INV:,.IYaY.f..fMaNN.1.w.kIM.N4Nq.' ,r ;aw...1i.,N.NW..WitM11rL4a'Yi/la'»l.-1f)bV.1k1MY:.N«;1:N..ANY:.Nd.N.NNM.W.•11W.: :rI.,.N4,»GI,r.ONY....N1tl.rZ dh1e1” . . W.NI.Aai.N.M.b./Ya/NW1ei�Ma1N..,i+WWNnKkN.lWah.NWAp'NlWrwwlwwl.rWiWVwY1.1...✓.N.(•iNWRY.N+1MamAk.P111�uMw..1NNlG'1•WHYYYfMV51MNiN1dlWAifY1N.Y11 YlNW'.II+.YiYN1YlIwf+M1�.}M'., f Cna . Ihs ecol — a I • .,•.• 1 "' 1 . wN + HMINMNVMWaYAW NrM a wWMJ. •I I 1 i . ..,.,m..... ..,..x,.,..., ... l ............ ....1.. !. ........',. ... .... ..,.,.,,...,., ., ...».......y- .. ., .. ., n...,...n.,..,1„ ...r,.,..«».n,..... r..A.n.,.ry .V .. ..w.... ..,, ,., xltw 4 1 x . r ' , fir ,. • .. • l' 4.4. i• • 1' • . , , , , .: „.S , . , ',.. . ... . . 1,. . ....::.:. ,.:.'.:.'..,,': . . . . .. , . . , , . P FDr � ., , . 1, , , it j .i.,,,ii<s..\ ,, . ( . . . 0,,,,... ...,.. ., , . . . ., .. . . . . ,. .1 . . . . 1 , . , .. . .... ...... . , . ‘,.,;:,,,,,,,,,...,,,,.,...,.....,,,,,..r,,,,,: , . , . . .. . .., . . • ,,,.....),.) ,, , . . , . , , , . . , . . , . . . . , . . , . . , . . , . .. . , . ., . , , ., '....:' , ,.. vl . . ... .., . . ,: • . .. . 1 ... . .,'. . . . , . .. . . , . ,,,. . . • . . . ., . , . . . . . , . , , .. . . , . , . . .. , . , , , . , , . , . , . . , .,..... . , ., :. ..., • , ,. ., , , • . . .. . , , , , , . . , . . . , .1. ,. ,1 1 r . . . 110,,,,_ . 1 : . .'.'''''' . 1 . :, .: , ,. ,.. . 1 . . , .. „ ........., ., , („„; . . . . , . . ; . , ,. , .1. .. , , ..V . , . . , r , , . ., . . • . , . . . , . . . . 1 . . . ... . . . . , . . . , , , , . , i. . . .. „ , . . . • . . , , , , , . . ., . , . . , . . , . , . . . 1 , . .. ,.. . .. . . . . .•, , . . . , . . . ,. 1 . . . , ., , , ., .. .: . I ,iii , . . . . , • . . • " 1 . , . , , ,, . . . . . . . , , , . ,.. . 1 ...,. . . . . ,„. , ., . .. ., , . . . . , . . :. • . . . .. . . .. . , . , , . : . ., . , , , , . . • . . 1, . . . • , 1 .. .. I . . ,... . , , . ,. ,. , . . ., . . • . ,n.............. „•. ,.. .,,�,.., •, „•,, .•,• ....,,.. .,..,...:.,..,.. ,.n ... ,.i..0•,.� ,• .., ,...•u.,., •Iw, �,....,. , n., +.r. •,+u .,v. �., •� �... , 4