SDR7-76 POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
` I J v- a,.0,d.L.bri ..1i:.1:.;'..GGU�.;.�".,:'..Nt; A ..U'1•wl 1 �.pu. a,:(.i..av,..:.,,..Mwa�.4+.,aw+:.Arn..4..r.-.. i<E.,,«x.++.I:64'.vu,tJ.--w.,l eq, Io-utxN' ,
JERRYS BA ER &:•STYLI C a r! ,j
Bite Ue e]:opmie : Red idw I ,1
• 12, 84 •` ltr� Stt'ee ' ° 't rl
w. a' ( ;l,J w...w1.t:.t..,.wNebt�cW+awuJaa'J.w /ww..wLL'I+1GkdG.+d1r :'.:dl......w.1..w.+.»1«.,.,a...,,r.....,nx.`.:..y-„.w.,..l..,.,u..v.t...,.+-,.,.».,uu,..is..:i,'''i.11.r`•
•
• c t r•
. 4
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
r
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
w i
I i
1 I
•
t
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
r i
•
I I
I i u
H
•
+� n
•
•
P
4
April 12, 1976
Mr.o Gera d D. Hakola
12330 S. l". , i.. . . St.
Ti card, Oregon 97223
Reference: File No S DR 7-76
Dear Mr, a ko a
. • Please be advised that the Tigard. Design Review Board, at their 1
' re(j u1ar meeting of ' arch 23, 19769 considered your, submission for
site development plan review and your site plan was approved vith
the conditions that:,i
ff,
1. Landscaping shall be coordtna"bed with the Re:ac Demonstration 1
Landscape Project;
$ss
2. Hose bibh be provided by the owner
• Your architectural sub nission. the original building ,
was approved with the recowendation that you consider the provisions
of windows on the second level and that t the window and sigas on the
lower level remain as per the original drawing.
Sincerely,
•
•
Dick Boles
•
Planning Director
DDtpt
note a The following acknowledment must be "eceived; by the City of
Ti ,ward within fourteen (14) days of your receipt of this letter. z
V ailure to return this acknowledgment,anent m ,y result ill action by
the City of TiL.,ard
w1' ' D hereby ac n o e d ry this i t y documenting the action wt the � •
TiLcard
Design Review Board 1 have received and read this letter g w e
to the decision anion hero documented and to abide by a any terms and/or cozy-
di :ions attached.
igna µ��eV,{r{yy�y�... w aw-„.»” ter' wwrn•+'M+-.aa+NiuGr+..+«.+.r•w ,
1
y��,y r
cue.t
,. -I
', �, - f I h.... .r,. ,<.uu. ri x_.,u:aL.d+t'.u...e.«...w1..t.M,Y>i1..-.wl_:.,...,.:.{jww...:w,WS,:.W4:.lnn:•.."aL,aA,...«...k�:.11«..,....adJ».wli�cY�,'..,�.J.:�,.4n'T..i«.l:rU'.,Wad.11>w,rh0.;.a',f,+n.,Nvwex.+!.xMu
, 1 f.,.ti......nf_ w. ,. ,..,I.f,..,. .. _,,,n. M .,.:......N .._..f... ..,....».,:.....,1,4,..;�4g,,,.t.....,.1.',,,,...,... .,, rc w, 1t
N
Y
SITE
DE1ELOPMEnT PLAN
,AND DESI REVIEW ,
�'site. 'Plan•. Architectural. F vi� L1 ±
.
APfL:tCATI D��
w.ww�wiwwMwww rrYww.+:w^w.'nrww^1,f F l S i'�•MW • �YN.W1W'YWF.MMl:ISq S,w41dwYLfw?kY+wbRwr , ,
I , I r(WN 1/,,4 ,d R1 E,.•'t[16 a Y I�r 1,1 l rM. /++�Tw{»I1 .,,I,s../!47» ,'
/) }�jf/ ..ww. ..w
4
W„tiwfiu..a.'��w:w ,rv..w.M+1.iw...w+J.w.»LN.,n».n..
ry N SSIO ( 639-4 1 ..
C� 1 1 W �.M.»L./WW .
TC�41D C�L ,lN1G I�l «w ....•.. r
12420 S a W. ��la r� Street,, Tigard, Oregon' 722 D
y r
. AM R{ Iler����MwWYMMiTM4M4ibMf lb.hwal�YrY�nW»awMMW.�YMIMr�wf�WM t'
�I
��a l 11 c�' :t y/� �. " .?lc1 ,ig "r'2.-4 (i �a 6 r..1f e r� '. .2 7
T"1 V wu.w.i �••+ .a.arrsou.ww,wr2.rwanwr.waLnu.nw".iwwtWu++Lw.++;�ii..t.. IIY�w+!•i.kaw•whwnwrw.N:4Mwr.wna:tAU.�� }
. � Owner/DeUe1cpe , 0. 1,,, AU„-1.3'
r.,.
•w.r..4.wr xu..w».N. n.1N•.. .L. ...uw:rwnrWra w,+dawdowrNNw,ww.Mrlw�n,w+n.w+w,u.^anla. .1:++wcllrwrM•wwnr.+•wra.w•' .e,.�+ '
• bkJ)_„ W .M..w.�rrr L
. " W • N U' M
Y.n w1V ww MWwLM'�Mwilwd . *MMMCMiI diM MM.N�NN4�VNMW1Mw�M4 •.M4M 111YNlNMNYp/MwNMMAawM WIwMW1fMYgMMM''A�✓» 'w
r 3 i R 7 r ro rV p r p E R y �w
.
, t
I 1
�^• 7 at tl tt', "�` r 1� xK"� 1 4" 't s 1� w i7f:2liila�iwr'1.1«,
. wui wLwww»w.»»:Yawa..A4+.r+w.�!.lr.w.wrWwuNe:w.rw.MW ..ww«.I�Wwn>a,.Mwdn:wR�(w.nwlJk«rwshtk4>n.s.NL+.uusurw�..JL.Nnwen� h�.,wwvMW+H'"IY Mnw>wuu«�6�lluAG-u ',HUbm>«wmwn,wrwwH .+.w'{ twwtx,.T^. .
r.N...44,' ".��rN.�: Naawi+, � w....... NM Y+w*41..4wncww..wwti..'Mf.....�....�u...... Www. ..rrw.w rK'N.........r........ .....Iww1•s wu.WU.......WIL....a.Y.....rw»...........e....44 Wt '
' , ..........4.............................1.........N .....MTw......,wMfN'UMNW�U•e.':%iwN..........Af.a.or... F'i.1431n..v.1,tY(1w}I..M1h .a,,,, .td:Y.YYYW,4,... 0404 Yn....W....1.• h'YIM1'l fWU11%4......LMSN.4,RY,NN.Y.Uw.YLy'�Yw1wNd,.IIW'1'�........I....MY..AY...•''
117704MIMp•+'4MN.'khYd}1 f46.Y4I0+..M.'..N 1,4.W44/ W4Y.`N..f'.,r4.4.40n0Mb K4'M'N.'S4`N4Y 6YWMN44,4110ww,W4w1.4..'YM.44M../I..i•W4u'NTW WI.RIIk.,■■ xl',awi4'Y1.4 ki{I A✓Na,M.l,k# .YiN.W fr RY ,,.,,1••i'h'.WH4v_A 1Ii44J1N401.1.!',a°..l.y11.i.,.l'fli 4W.,MeV{4s.:11SNlh'NMi:Jt.'kf/i4'e...NUN414 WSi1 .
. •.............II........................+_N.,M.......,.••U....NY oi...............41:1Y11..1 11.1,..xl....,W''.I.L......YY:.1..11...1Y"04,i...Lw•....d JY..V4414..1.,...N1.3A-J4 R..14.7.4#4..Artro,..rderY,1NLYnHM%1*...rr W.NI.Nu.Y01'r114,....r04,0`4,4,'f•r.44.4
t �u •t W �1,•} ,( ,/,/y l(,�e�[� 2.4 •wW, C. > 1.,1 ''i. r.. °d,,p , M.. /1. /t�-�
1 h�.Y..1.� Si r.A w�.+.:i 4i ..r.NOC.n.�.n....4 .rMnw«..'f. y 1'w'''. ..a.F i..'• .1 ,, ''Y „ / `-./', ,
.,.' w L w .m....nww.....w'.n1•.R.rwhu.....,n' uwN0.t fe"1,-4 00.4.4.n o.u,,1.04∎*..u4t4.41.tl.NwWwylt«
i � I . t p A -
w a w.wW.•w.11 wLa uww.iiwwul .rw.huw4sLUrwa:.• w1
�,
w W
. , ' Anti:,cipy1rated Davel.r prnan€ �`�Oat:, y '
. 0 ir..liJ 741.MN+WJW LW6.4.44W.4.0r,i W0 4.1 1YW.i114..M4Aww.1W.N4.4.,610NY.0,44.4.0.M.,11.1.014041NYUN4/.W.•r1W11wLM.MO..bMIMM%M...M.44,41. .....,k.WHw...r.
1.
n �ticipated Deve1opm n Pha9u ,.....My.w ....Yw www. W'w..-,..nw.......ww. rr .a. , .„ . .w .r Ki. .. w.....„.. N .......w..
• l
' Valuation t J wr. w. .... . Mw/M.. 1r. '.. ...1rL...... . W.1:w .....i.w4..,.. ... '. Ilv.lk•`..,..„YW ,....a.uMi w 1•�' .M.•w�wwui.i„W +%nF y„•
.. DD NOT WRITE BEL O1, ..�1..1; LINE'.
__. -,",. , ..wAR.w,M+":.�u.w ..1.f.a.,.MN,1r.NYwY.....+•W..M1�+7 ., - wo1...+W,iiia.�Jeil...:,.i...e):.:wY.RYUWn«iw.LJn+�wrM.w.4r .ra.x+Lwn..1i�
_. wG:.UwrYr�*Wl41o.i.a.wn.W1wM 'I
W a1 Ccidior Dedic
y I1./N.w..;,.d.,,,.}MW'...1f.w.,,.,tl1MM.` 1
1 �ww
'� " ly Y3...i..I.i1,U..1}L.4�MM'..CN'.41 WTANIfM!.('....I IYI .i'IYF1MInY.i...,1�IWi'1.��111{"tN../ 1F1F�Mu1�w.�'b1MU1.4jYR.lb ,
4J '•.� wwlL..w l.+bYMwww..slWwywl;..w!.wyYi.wlw'./w.Ti4w.+Nw.dN+lw'w4•wNetli�.ewwa+N+M.w..4MwYk'r.«9tl.W".N.t+.ww.wrl.uw;w+A.++a11.1w«w�wwNV.:wwywY+iMI.i1LLInM..'.`141:iwi�
' rfw.o w.Yn.lgwur�.r4..:.twl..ibl+ww....
rla h be
•
p D•
4w..YwlWJrw.. w..•w»»wr..l..ww+...}Yl.i rw.rn..Iwld..w41.+4wi.iN.4r +Nw.wwwrAwwiw+wur'u.+W14J1.4�.i...
.
I
pp
1
1
F r
.. _. ...l-.. ._...,.... .J.. _ ... ..Is... .,,a.I...».I ..,.,- ,.. i:,:.:.- x..-.JL:G.h.x9;,.L,.. Iw.a..;wa:.•.J,:..r:.u.,..i,,:a..,...,4 .n I ,. •a,,....,.. ..'C.Mwr'"t`: f«,a4: i.•.,.,.1,...,..,,.zw...r... ...u..., ,......s.rz,.Ir.Yw a ...c{A 1.„`-.+
,
51)A, /
MINUTES
Tigard Site Development Plan & Architectural Design Review Board
'March 23, 1976 -w 5:00 p.m.
General Telephone Building
12460 Main St. , Tigard', Oregon
1. CALL TO ORDER: Meeting called to order at 501,E p.m. by Chair-
, man McMonagle
/ 2• ROLL CALL: Present: McMonagle, Olson, Wakem, Hammes, alternate
1 Lakeman; staff: Bolen
/ 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes of 3/9/76 meeting approved as
submitted.
4. COMMUNICATIONS: None
DESIGN REVIEW
5.1 SDR 7-76 (Jerry's Barber Shop)
° A proposed commercial building which will stand in the place
e
of the wood frame building now housing Jerry's Barber Shop,
R
I
from this location.
which will be removed from
As Site Development Plan Review
1. Staff Report: read by Bolen.
� y
2. Applicant Presentation:
o Site plan presented by Charlotte Olson who
stepped down from her position on the Board L
to represent her client Jerry Hakola. She
pointed out that the building will occupy nearly
the entire site with the exception of the front
5 ft. She concurred with the staff recommendation
that the landscaping should be in tune with that t
provided with the fepac Demonstration Landscape
Project.
3. Board Discussion and Action
• I o Lakeman m oved to approve the submitted site elan
with the conditions that the landscaping be
coordinated with the Re ac Demonstration Landscape • .
Project and a hose b,ibb be provLded by the owner.
o Motion 'seconded by Wakem.
o l Passed by unanimous vote of the 4 members voting.
B. Architectural Design Review
1.
App leant w
s Presentation
r •
I I
I I
•
1
s.. ,., ,., .........., _..:4'., .. ..._., '.t'i. .....,t.. _.,. .... ,.....U,.«.: ... ,.a.,x :3:-x..... .«. .,.. , ....'4:.c':w'»a,.,.,a• ., t... _ uy'„...« .. ?. if;.: .......r a... . ., r,. 'YJ;::.•.
' °M
page 2
DRB Minutes
,r 3/23/76 1:d ,,
0 The building architecture was presented by
Charlotte Olson and she explained that,since
the submission was made to the City, a new
building design had been developed. She then .
stated that the Board now had before it two ,...
separate designs for their consideration.
•
o McMonagle asked if Mr. Hakola had a preference
for one over the other.
o Olson responded that Mrr. Hakola had been receptive ,
to most of the design alternatives that she had
come up with and he seemed to be in favor of
either design.
r
o Lakeman stated his preference for the originally
submitted design and showed the members a sketch
that he had made revious to the meeting; which
p g
. do
in the front for the second story
placed. windows
room.
o The other members concurred that they found the'
original design superior to the sketch submitted 4 ,
by Mrs. Olson at the meeting.
•
o Lakernan moved to approve the original building
design with the applicant considering the pro
vision of windows, on .the second level and that
the window and signs on the lower level remain
a s
per the
original .
,
o Seconded by Hammes and passed by unanimous vote
4of the members voting. 4.11,
5.2 SDR 6-76 (Bantru.st Industrial Park Expansion)
•
An expansion of the 13antrust Industrial Park on SW 72nd
south of Boons Ferry Rd.
A. Site Development Plan Review
1. Staff Report & Recommendation
o Bolen presented the staff report and recommendation
that the site plan be approved as submitted;
2. Applicants Presentation
o Fred' Barrett presented the proposed site plan
stating that the intent in this portion of the
g
development+ �
g
smaller Ley s i.z
ed buildings.
He said that this represents ..
'a change in the
t'(' ' a ,
•
page 3
DRB Minutes I
3/23/76
•
market situation from 3 years ago when this •
project began. This change was due primarily
to the rising energy costs and the expense of
., h e ating large interior spaces wh ich are not
required by certain tenants.
•
•
3. Board Discussion and Action
• o Lakeman stated that he found the smaller buildings
"jumbled" in front of the larger lineal buildings 3 V
to be an undesirable break from the original con-
cept •
cept design. '
o Olson moved to approve the submitted site and.
landscape plan with the condition that an irri
gation plan be submitted to the staff. '
o Wakem seconded and the motion was approved by ac,
majority vote, Lakeman dissenting.
B. Architectural Design Review I,
1. Applicant's Presentation;
0 Fred Barrett presented the basic building layout
and Rick Sieto, the project architect, presented V s
the details of the architectural design.
2. :hoard Discussion and Action
o Wakem asked if the air conditioning units would
be roof mounted.
o Sieto said they would be roof mounted for those !,
tenants who desired them and the heating units
would be placed within the building. '
o LakE Ian expressed concern about the accent trim
around the facia. Be said he felt the trim color
on the upper wall should, be played down.
o Hammes moved to approve the architectural_ design
,as,. submitted.
o Wakem seconded and the motion passed unanimously.
6. OTHER BUSINESS None
7. ADJOURNMENT: 6:45 p.m.
•
' + •,,. ,,... ...` ., �•. ,�.., »•r•...�•r.s.,.w p L ..cur. t« ' ',., .. , ..w '., . .• •.•.... r . , .r...a..N.,,i••
l 4