Loading...
SDR45-76 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. • • • • ..,, ,,. .A._..Ua��IM:.:.w.,..a..:.a.14,�,�;J.n,a.�.,4 i..„,.:..,i'..,.�...�,a `l',..�.M,111,�«...a,z.rua:,dh.tdt«:•:.,I�H:.'wr'd.4..v.t,ld"+,+.Mar.,, ..!,..w.�ti.,re,..r«Ji 41c,+il.-:r!lu'k:i.Mwr,r••�.w.nv�.+.a.,;,,M�4.'-..: ,,.,tut.,.,4•Iwnm�'.•..,65ir...am11A.�.�x nitrhnr 1,M.,.,.�w:,nrl:wal..t�.krve»:.':R,A.ICHC,i-.*ar,.kw.•„I..,luaw,•.xa«.;...,+».w r ,n.- arr,.•+r, Y"'Mryxw .'n.Y,.+""'''” .''''''''',.,wa.,«..-,.n..''',.... .,1 -„4, II ° a 1 ARTEK INDDSSAIE5 1 I ORt?C tAIED„ . ' 4 Site Devexopmen.tl Review ;(SDR 4 -.76) ', • SGa" and�i�a ' 1 '_.ri^ ul,I1P.4ffi7 ,. l . .tt .....,t..: M..,:=....na..7..«..t...y..ll+w.i...i...,.«..li.+a..e....1_.,,..G..Jwr-.'r-.-,:1..uw.w,°—, .1 . A I r)•.'''' 1. I • • 1 • • ' . v, w , 1 ■ i' I , f I I 1 • ■ I I r I II , • ■ I l • rn • • • I 1 I ■ , � I I. ■ I• • • q_.rr.y tl ` • n +Z • Marz:h 14, 1978 ye i t :Cored S. James & Co. of Oregon 1 S.W. Columbia Portland, OR 9721 ► Re: SDR, 4 -76 Artek e r Sir: iJ Please be advised that the landscaping at 7350 S rW Landmark ro Lane has been completed sctisfacto:ril r. Therefore, Landscape Completion Bond No. SL11n628999O may be released. Very truly yours Nancy Edwards i Community 'Design Planne NE/bkm c Jahre Construction ■ . i . . , iortPF11'1.406' !r t Bond No.SLR6289990 CITY OF TIGARD ' ' ' BOND TO GUARANTEE COMPLETION OF LANDSCAPING ' 1' KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that we SABRE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY P. 0. Box 23187, Portland, Oregon, as Principal, and FIREMAN'S' FUND INSURANCE COMPANY , as Surety, are jointly and severally' held and bound unto the 'City of Tigard, in the sum of Three Thousand i' , Five Hundred and'no/100ths Dollars ($ 3,500.00 ) for the payment �, of,which we.jointly and severally bind ourselves', our heirs, executors, admin- j • ietrators, successors and assigns firmly by these presents.l' • THE CONDITION OP THIS BOND IS SUCH: „ y, . That whereas the Principal herein has ,'made application to the City Engineer , I , 1 of the City of Tigard for a permit to Complete landscaping at 73TO S.(%J.,,, -----7'- Landmark Lane, Tigard, Oregon NOW THEREFORE, if the Principal herein, shall faithfully and truly observe the terms, provisions; conditions, stipulations, directions'and requirements of ' . said permit and shall in all respects,' whether t-he'same'be enumerated 'herein ' i•a or not, faithfully comply with the same and.shall assume the defense of, , indemnify and save,harmless the'City of Tigard,,its officers, agents and employees from all claimsliabilities, loss, damage or injury which may have I . I been suffered'or claimed to have been suffered to persons or property'directly ' or indirectly resulting fromlor" arising out of the'.;operations 'or conduct of', , r° ' said Principal or Gany subcontractor in the performance or conduct of the work I , Under said permit; and shall in all respects faithfully keep and observe all of said terms; provisions; conditions, stipulations; directions and requirements,, them this obligation''is Void,; otherwise it shall'remain in full ' ' force and effect: A I • ' WITNESS Our hands and seals this 17th day of August 1977. ; YWS,a,,s 1 '`4r4«+1e SABRE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY i'' r ` s r ' w.✓' ' ,x>{r u Y.'yyaeaA+.4,,r J " ,,r ,:, 0 ,,,.'do a w y. •' f4 r .,. e k:,i- i,, ,, dd 4, , ,�',1 w r V 09 .a. P tl�ft;f "`k�.'s$ E„ 1,Y, VIREPAN t S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY ' M,»X41"., ,J.. •,:, L „ /� 1 � �t�ad. l4wa'p�r�f• �'� 41<'" y ;IC 6°/ t 6..., �r r,:G,,„.,.,.. . .Y� X, 0, t!tral.g s At to ney-in-fact Lv'r111t4ttIlPd, 1 q h M ; Y }+Y r■, 11P f f ' « ' ' : .il.lw I r'h} 4 w r ,rut.`" 'Y• I ,�, A:r1 i4 ° , .Yt r:0‘.',,,,!''Nrti 1 .:h<vy , p 1�� A' r i" r" w9t,G, G "fir ,i»+. I f "d 1' 1 a y.+ n r w I 1W A Kr 3�N�4 . ' I ' ' 11111itBtilt, ° ' 1 •• 11 1 I • . i I • . • i Q '+>• r• 'r .i .'+,•,.:A r'•1 +, ,:it.i •',�, _��+,,:u�,,q•.„ .„ ,t,i . � .'+..r . .•� I•,, , • aEconpt21G REQUESTED 1dY , •, I AND WHEN RECORDED HAIL TO • 4=6 w.:/ •treat ddross •tab .fp I_ _.J GENERAL'POWER OF ATTORNEY FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY SNOW LL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, a Corporation duly organized A nized and existing ' under the laws of the State'.ol Calllornia,and having its principal office in the City:and County of San,Francisco,in said State,has made, p constituted and appointed,and does by these presents make, constitute and appoint,,' ' ---•--Kr, C. KRAIG-_'--:- 'PORTLAND, OREGON . its True and lawful Attorneys)"in-Fact, with lull power and authority hereby conferred in its name, place and stead, to execute, seal, ' ,• acknowledge and deliver any and all bonds, undertakings, recognizances or other written 'oblige- • ta.ons in the nature thereof r ' and to bind the Corporation thereby as fully and to the same extent as Ill such bonds were signed by the Presi lent, sealed with the corporate seal of the Corporation and duly attended by its Secretary, hereby ratifying and confirming all that if said Attorney(s)-in, . , Fact may do in the premises, This power of :attorney Is granted pursuant to Article VI1i, Section 30 and 31 of By-laws of FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY. ' adopted on the 10th day ol.Novernber, 1965,and now in full t,;ice and affect. , r''" "Article VIII. •Ipriuinlriuiit and Willi/Ira,/ of lienni•u1 ,in,rtetant Srrreler,ra, and .I1Evni,,.(r.Paet and ,I;tnnfn to accept :.opal Proem( and Make r ;.y Appearances, Section 30 Appointment.The Chairman al the florard at Directors. 1 e Pretndeni.any V1.o•Wrrstdr•n1 at any other Person authorized by.the Board of Directors,the Chairman al the Hoard al Directors the Prr•t•tdent or any vie Prrrtrdanl,may Imam time to Ilmn.appoint Resident Aralbtanl Secretaries and Atlarneys•n•Facl la represent and del tor and on behalf at the Corporation and Agents to accept legal process and make apiaearanes.e Inc and on behalf of the Cotlwtatton. • Section 31, :intlinrft+t.The Aultiordy of such liesid,•nl Assistant Seormarir•a litlarneys•tn•Vact,and Agents shall be an prescribed in the instrument •• rv+drtictng Iherraypatntinnnl,,and any burn nunaintuu ni and all authority grunlocf'thereby may be revoked at any tuna by the Huard of Dtrectora or' . by any person emriawerud to make us,n uarcuriu ent Thin pnwnr of attorney is signed and seated under and by the authority of the following Resolution adopted by'tat,board at Directors ' • • of FtRf MAN'S,FUND INSURANCE COMPANY at a meeting duly called and held on the 151h day at July, 1966, and that said Resolution has sal been amended or repealed! ''RESOLVED, that the signature at any Vice-President, Assistant Secretary, and Resident Assistant Secretary at this Corporation, and ' . the seal of thin Corporation may be allixed or printed on any paw'ir at attorney, on any r.tvocattun at any packer at attorney, or on arty certificate relating thereto, by facsimile, and any power at attorney,any revocation of arty aawhr at attorney,or certificate bearing V , ' ' such facsimile signature or lacsinnle seal shall be valid and binding upon the Corporation." IN WITNESS WHEREOF; FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY has caused these presents to he sighed by its Vice"President,' , and Its corporate seal to be hereunto ofhxed this._�Q.thray of Ii1areh ; to. ,75, ' ,,'�""..:,2a Fl di AN'S FUND INS RAiv'CN COMPANY'4=?A Mill.it);� By ...,--,_./.. .41.4(.e/•. ' ,.•w~«'•!-(; n_,._w,,.....,...,._....,,..._:,,. 44 cry' iAME.S ti,WEi.LS . Vlce•Prakldant STATE OF CALIFORNIA, • > es, r CITY AND, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO J On this. 2Otl-..duty at ,M•rCh • _— _.,. 19...,7s..., before me personally came lames N. Walls, to me known, who, ,l. being by inn duly sworn,did dapnael and nay' that hce is Vice-president of FIREMAN'S FUtJD INSURANCE COMPANY, the Corporation I described In and which executed the above Instrument; that he knows the seal of said Corporation;' that the seal affixed to the said ; Instalment is.,such corporate seal; (fiat it was so affixed by order at the Board'at f')trectaro at said Corporation and that he signed his ' ;, name thereto by the order, ;h' • ' 114 WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal,the day and year herein first above written, ttpdisrtt maimotiobrIonanintatrbldani ttaintroiitaa ti ' t it f�IADY NGWI:�CRRY �,,� il » I'tat NOTARY:PUBLIC�-CALIFORNIA El , .: tt;1+ CITY lA COWRY OP$Afd FIIArICISCCS .' ,l I� Y :N-Ir VI ...a. ,....,W.....,,,•�.,..l„I11.,i,1, ,'1 r It C,At?14rWIt.,H+r',notary r ts • by Cammluteri txplrl:t'Scot.x11,19,76 1: • ud6 nttubldid8bttttandbdtnottaiiadainAlleibtitbninatddttldng GSII'1!iFlpli`I'E t . • STATE t 1"CALIFORNIA; ,. } to, x • CITY,AND COUIIPY nF SAN FRANCISCO 1, the undersigned, Assistant Secretary of F'IIICM'AN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, a CALIFORNIA Corporation,''00'HERESY CERTIFY that they kit-prolog anal sitar:herd POWUfI Of"ATTOHIJFY romaine In R AI lamer' and ban not been revoked; and furlhata,loro' I that Article, 'Jf.flelodtunlj 10 and 31 at the Ety•laws:of the Corporation, and the Itehaluiton a, 'Ihe Board of Directors, net forth In 0.41 'I ' ,i, Pawor at AplAnt4,3 r i'r0llt ,,in farce :a ' r� k'd auyn l',�r, J rte*' 6 t Sigded; +.401erd,:at Ihe` Wand'lColanty of Son Pranateeo,baled the'., defy,of ' ' ! ,'to/7.. ,'t "t r,'e, o el avers tt '' o tJ . 9 w"4 s. 4' 6+t4k .»' . I ;"'t.C� i,. xr -,I, r, 41♦ a • r f,` .�. t M`r 7*{l'ly `�l t. *'�S.,I ^I° "r l;° f;,uc r»,,;, I - IhtICACL�IT,Ii!•IDVV!!�Asdtolttnt Mbctatoty , rue, .. , .w. _ ..� 1 L - bo m. e b7 A MINUTES R TIGARI7 SITE DEVELOPMENT AND ARCHITECTURAL I'DESIGN REVIEW BOARD • r5 December 28, 1976 - 5 : 00 P.M I General Telephone 9040 S .W. Burnham Tigard, Oregon 1 1 . CALL TO ORDER' Meeting was called to order by chairman McMonagle at 5 :25 P.M. j2. ROLL CALL: Present : McMonagle, Cook, Goldbach and Olson . Staff : Bolen . 3. MINUTES : Cook moved and. Goldbach seconded that consideration of the minutes be tabled to the January 14th meeting. r P , 4'. COMMUNICATION: Bolen briefly discussed with the Board a , scheme for relieving v`Y g the heavy meeting i ng load presently being z g . experienced by the Design Review Board . This consisted of the Board acting as an appeal body with the staff administra- tion reviewing the submissions . The response of the members present was favorable to this proposal . • 5 . DESIGN REVIEW: 5. l SDR 1-76 Amendment to the architectural design of the Tigard Medical Clinic to allow a 3 ' x 30 ' wall sign on the west building face, A. Staff Report : Rather than read the prepared staff report , Bolen reported that the applicant had earlier in the day ti agreed to remove the reader board and gift shop portions of the sign. By so. doing, the Board' s • previous concerns over these two elements of the r ` sign were eliminated. B. Board Action : • Cook moved and Goldbach seconded to approve the sign as modified . • 5 , SDR 45-76 Review of a proposed 8 , 000 sq , ft . office/industrial building on S .W , Landmark Lane . SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW A , Staff Report': Read by Bolen. B. Staff Recommendation : reports See s1;af�" • C. Applicant 's Presentation • iv r 1 1 • •.r t T^ •wAw+rH•...w.+NwiW+bn..r.ti•Itu>R4`,n.. •' 1 r . ^ • v" • • p IL iL: Y MINUTES r e ' ,p, TI GARDE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD December 28 , 1976 Page 2 Mike McGee from Sabre Construction described the needs of the tenant relative to the submitted site ,, plan. He stated that moving the two parking spaces I t I as recommended by staff would conflict with the truck loading facilities D. Board Discussion ,M 0 Cook stated his agreement with the ap plli cant that moving the two parking spaces is unadvisable . • . 0 , McMonagle' stated that this area on the cul-de-sac would have sufficient landscaping without moving the two parking spaces and especially if the sidewalk were placed adjacent to the curb o Cook moved and. Goldbach, seconded to approve the rr I submitted' site plan subject t to staff recoa menda- 1 , tions #1 , 2,, and 3 to be worked out by staff . Motion was approved unanimous vote i.. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW A. 'Applicant Presentation : Mr. McGee presented architecture. B. Board Discussion :n . Cook moved and Goldbach seconded to approve Motion was approved by unanimous ,vote . 0 . 3 SDR 46-76 (Dickinson) Review of a proposed I�20, 000 sq. ft . warehouse, at /off ice �`, �,, t� 7325 S .W. Bonita Road. Cancelled due to absence of submission . G. ADJOURNMENT: . Meeting was adjourned at 6 .05 1? .M« • i n i 'i ,...... .,"....,.,u. .... ............., tea....., ., v., ......,, ,.. ..w.,,, ,... rn I i ..ar;u,pv rsxt a • f • I ¢ 44 r * , q STAFF REPORT . TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ' . AGENDA 5 .2 December 28, 1976 General Telephone 9040 S .W. Burnham -- Tigard, Oregon r M . DOCKET: SDR 45-76 (Artek) . • REQUEST: Review of a proposed 8, 000 sq. ft . industrial building ' on a one acre site zoned M-2, General. Industrial . : S .W.OCATION,. 5 �1 Landmark Lane, west of S .W,' 72nd, Avenue. (Wash. Co . Tax Map 2S1 ].2A, Tax Lot 600) . APPLICANT: Artek Industries/Sabre Construction 1 • ' 1,• I . BASIC FACTS l,f 1 , The site is designated "General Industrial" and zoned ,► Industrial" . M�2, General Idtil 2 . The site was part of a minor land partition approved by l'I, the Planning Commission 12/21/76 with the following ,t'4 conditions : 1 . Access to all lots be gained from S .W. Lan dmark Lane. 2 . No building permits for the newly created lots be issued until prior Planning Commission conditions have been satisfied. 4 II . FINDINGS : 1i* The site is vacant and presently overgrown with grasses ` , and berry vines along the north property line . The site slopes up from IS vW. Landmark Lane with a 10 ' change in 1 . elevation from the front to the rear of the lot 2. S .W. Landmark Lane is a recently improved City street ' A subdivision variance was approved requiring a side walk on only one side of the street - the north 'side 3 . Section 18 .44 ,010 of the Tigard Municipal Code allows "plastic molding, including the manufacture of plastic products as a permitted use in the M. 2 zone, " The pro ' , C posed use is a plastic putty product processing plant ' with associated office space , The rise is permitted +414 outright in the zone 4 . Section 18.44 0�0 of the Tigard ard lL i i P a1 Code, requires res >~ the following setbacks, front 30 ' , side 20 ' , rear 201 . . • The site plan satisfies the required setbacks., section l 8 .00. 120(G) (a) of the I� ar' d iMunaci al Code requires one parking space/1000 sq 1 It . gross floor , area. The . site plan 'shows 9 spaces r , r 1 • A.,...,w warn rynea.rn .euna.al}.4`. i ' 1} I . � 1 , '4' n .. ' r tI S F . ii REPORT T STAFF DESIGN REVIEW BOARD , . Agenda 5 .2 d December 28, 1976 - •, Page 2 4. LANDSCAPING: I . BASIC FACTS: tl • Section J3 .5b.080(2) of the Tigard Municipal Code states te s ' "All areas not occupied by paved roadways,, structures or ` walkways shall be landscape . A minimum of the front• 20 ' ' shall be landscaped. . . " II . FINDINGS : f. ' 1 . Section 18 . 58.080(2) of the Tigard Municipal Code requires. 20", oX landscaping, in the front„'yard setback. .F . , . The site plan satisfies this requirement with the ' exception of the western parking area. Relocation of the front two spaces to the eastern parking area will satisfy this requirement. • ' 2. Sufficient perimeter planting has been provided except ' • the western side of the lot . The front portion is shown to be "Old Gold Juniper" 15 ' on center in bark dust planting beds . This spacing of the low materials s is extremely sparse and should be supplemented by the, ' addition of evergreen trees . 3. The landscape plan shows Norway Maple trees along S .W . . • Landmark Lane. These are a good street tree and appropriate to the site 4. The irrigation is noted on the landscape plan to he a , manual underground system in the front and hoe bibbs in the rear . The hose bibbs appear to be ade sate with , , ., the location of an additional outlet at the : rthwest r of the building. ng No detail as to sprinkler head type, height, etc : has, been <, • provided. Without this information it is difficult to determine its adequacy . • .- STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval with the following conditions A. SITE PLAN, The front two parking spaces in, the western parking . ■ area be relocated and replaced with landscaping similar to the remainder of the frontage D LANDSCAPING; 1 , A de tailed irriga tion s step be submitted for itaf f approval, . q' , • • • � ,It . ... a,IM,.,..,�, M. .a. � � .s.„ r,.,7'kb•.,i:.o-M+a�.«. .:L.:--.....�I:+,.:w'MJr4,+!;,..I,...,:..,�.....v F4.4�.,;;.A.,.,�..........1..;•�,..'wl.•a..,.all,..4'...�. :111t....,.�:wu.l�,u.. ,n+.s„ ..� d STAFF REPORT TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Agenda 5. 2 . Deeembe.,.° 28, 1976 Page 3 • 2. A hose Bibb be provided for the northwest corner of the building. 3 Three evergreen trees be added along the western edge of the front portion of western landscape bed. • • 14" • I I I .. I e1 a • • I � • • t • • • • � I IJ I I I i k • u d A f�G • • • • .. .. ..,,,.,, �._...... .,,1_,... _,.,.-.? ........_..,,,1._,._.,, .,a M,..�_...a«„,«,..x:.,...,....M s�,_ .,..,..,_.....,.n„,_,,..::.r✓.ry ,,._.......,,._t.,_—�H....,..,_..r.w ,._.. _.. .a,«.1...,t......�...,..,r,...,;_,..t.��,.t.,, ......,,�.o yd «..a..�-t>........ ......»,",:.... • n.ii,w a4r r SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN`AND DESIGN FR.EUIEW . �v Site Plan Review File No. 1r Architectural Review Fee Received _.•31 ^ APPLICATION Receipt # 1 y 7 f PP DatReceived - Tigard Planning Commission BY —r 12420 SW Main St, , Tigard, Or. 97223 -��� 639-4.171 Filed_ Project. Title� � ��1 t �. � Eh�1�h�U�� "'��.t '��� �‘�,)'(,�,� Date� ate �( Project Address �. . i9 /A, PAN), Tax Map No e2 ,5 :. Tax LoiL No .� --r•� Owner/Developer __t .+ » ` �a�"" Address _z„,2.5. Telephone ..�.�..4......wr'.Q. w . .w . t owner's Telephone 104. ,C6(..04/4. Signature' • L PROPERTY rr OP R -- Pro?ased Use #Builda.ngs # Un is .w. S Ftp Site Size 4$9,APte, Tot, Sq. Ft of Build;ngs C� Sq. Ft. of Paving 4X Z#17, Sq. Ft. of Landscaping .A1 P24 Anticipated Development Date alvq k.. ..� .. ( ,1 ' Anticipated Development Phe,Ses / • Valuation t aco?!.? DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE • Special Conditions - Dedications Bonding Other • l'ii Date na1 Inspection' by .._ .., a •