Loading...
SDR38-76 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. A 1 1 1 . I i JY�r.MM•.. .DUI.W..rt ,! .A I l�. dr;:tu .,I,n-..pJ..M�-,L..-•.::»...r4� �,�i�„., w.�I�+itt�,.tl.,1,f.aM«.dCJ«.rt.•.,-,J.a;rasa ..;*:«.w.ra+,,x(uA;.l za.,..t�,^•:*.•'•a'�•ri„C.k,1f-:p'+u.,,vJdt.ir�u;:h«p;1..11,u1-.unn.n+4.x..�,�o�a..�•�c,:rrr u.r.,w-raVx a•r lrr 3r.R;+�ra..mx,'n+a,;'.;�5. r".'".. T' I.,,r �y +Ynr•.•��,r - ef' I +R iw�t P 'f•+ »n•..w.�� U} Th�� • • I •• I Pacific fa,gh a r 'Motor `Hotel :1 .., r ;• rl • • • • • • • RR r S v i rr • r in I , . q . n+•n-r..:i. .....q.+.,-. .....n.....::.,,�..�-A1Lw....,n.r..w,•�.��..�.L:iW:..ar..,1.M..L4�A:x.4.fAi t..:>�.Ya n4u..a,.J�.wk.n.....w•:..ti:,.. 1 �.�.�,..;.J. .ru.wiJaA-l. b.:._M.l K....AAU.4.11,11+YPxT:W.I.SxIJM.,.W.i.IjA4 an1N4•A....w4i-V:LS•A17W-0fAC1.a1:tisu.tr...u..w.«,.-w.n w+...,,.,....nxw- r....M- ,4nk.ra•....r.+w.ria..,?A>4.glPid.< �x +x+U :,. Oregon State Highway Div i _ . f , DISTRICT 2A MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR VICTOR A1WYEw OREGON 97075.056 P.O.F'U BOX 565, �EAVERTO 97075-0565 PHONE 229-5002 September 25, 1986 ,; in Reply R o rti vA...,, File NA.; U 0 r . Mark Davis SF P ,6‘'-) 8 .. P.O. Box ,4041p Portland, OR 97240 �P nF ItGI.\ ,.�► • RE. Access Re view ' � Ways de 'Inn ' i 99W in Tigard '•j We have reviewed the traffic report and the proposed access modifications in the devleo mart of a convention center in the'„ f('' Wayside Inn parcel. The concept of the, right turn in, right turn out, left turn in access located somewhat in the center of the parcel is generally acceptable. The exact location of this driveway should try �1 ,•v to take into consideration the location of driveways on the , opposite side of 99W. This would be to eliminate potential left turn conflicts in •the med median. M Design n criteria of the access and im p rOvements on the right�-of-�wa will addressed in the site design and your application . for access permit from this office. Sini.erely, o al H. Gunderson Dist.Asst trice Maintenance Supervisor LHG c mfr n•,. cc: Keith Lid.e r Ron. Faiimezger Way Lee ,' • • I I ° T • II I , it Form T$4 X097 y , I ,, r • • '4 0 .A13,140i",'.:,.M-fw,T+,l,ti',:F.-U., «.{:.,4.F .,.:..X.,,,,,,,,.;-,:.C+N.L0;,.., ,;k::1..a.�u.....•...`�H4n-•,.Imk...k:ie:;k0.+:�H4rlya,A4,..;p:4.6,Li,+;w, .,:1'. ,,.W,nGn(.......1.........4,,...,......'w.JA.. w» ....J..n..«......-l..f.J::» ..4H.a, ....Jw.�..WUA.:;a.w «.t1w:L.44" ..rv.Nn4'u,.L....w+..AW w.....,c.r ry .,,.Nr I.V-A,e+ A.-1'«wi..l ,I i �I gg ■ fin, • • . 1 / .i.„y , . g/i . . . . , , , , . . ,, . ,i,.),L,,,,,,,,,/,,,,,, . - , . , i . ',,,. ,. , , • . • . . , , , • , ., , • ,,,,,,,,.., . 1 , ,. , 1 , j ,,..,. , , , ,:,. . , ....,.. , , , • , , , 1 . i , , . . , , . / .tt, , ,i . , 1 , . • , , , 74, • • • i Y Y a e r i • I i T , r ii i b .;' , v .. 4) L 1 1 'i'li ' ' ,/7 '' t417 T5/:' r 4 .' A '-,-• ..,... r w,,. ..u.,. h. lu•.v..1 5a.w ....,... .. .„.,w a,,t§. 1.w..,.n ,.x� ,R4. r..L« �,+. ..L,. ..I..-.�.1„ " .�«. .r.+."+�...... ,.,. 1.in •.: ..w«. w -...,....yxn,+...- .r .r. �.. N ,..«rv,-..v a.. _:,rv.....r.-r d 7 r J � ee4y. ,, e . A7,‘..1 „. ,, - .._., ,„ ee d old 4 ,fria, 'e,s• . _(t i z° . i ' ''' , , ' 66.1 miiial-/L)T5 -. 1 : ,. - .- . 0 /Teie ci,orte eeit'ee ,,,/,/, ,-gt voiaioles (7-4/ -1,1 ... ..ee,,,n /64,./ i , / yie. 47/ / / 1 ,/ „ i . ---- 7'v2' it9” ‘44-#7(-546'1'7 e's a/ ,,4-1°‘) e e 2 eee-5/94/147 l'Aell/ : ng ,( 2/ r. t? f eves ' , r► 9 4,, ,s, i,,6,6,,,,,5,,,._ c„,,,e,,,, 6.,excii,,,,,ce ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,oe 1 , ,, ,,, / ,,..eiel ,/,',,7.6)e / 7) "i4s, a, ,,,, 1, ., /21_," '7IZe '4' . '• 1...-.1'' '41'.) c,i4ly A ,/,`76.4e44,54 . ,:16.e ce.,-1)6e,,e.,,,,e14,/,/ 714:?l'e , 40.e4eigi*e,,,-t74',_'/: ,,,, , 1 , -. b ' G( e�� R /J'r� e,461,,,,/ if/ . . *"'"--- „,,..12:. ala-et.' evAi.oe,..,,,,i4 ,,,,voeyi,$,19 /Le262,..,4',5 '24, ge-,/,94.4.,,,r1le ,,,, c5,/,'e 1.' .... r /� fir' - ad 4 i i I_ � N C) 4./ 4 ,--,1- / e d l'r•)'24t1 ,� �'?�� %��t 1'"�V Cif i2�'" �""� � . ... u e , . . Jca'Ioi 01)0.-i- 491elefolde 4L44 /71, l,,c)//1 11-es`(*--� '4A ,5 e•4 �,, G f. - G`✓'G r G fi. '� r y V 7)6 ll/er.,h, iy't y (2).._., x// /7, „it ; 5ii_ ,. Y r { et) et 4 c a/61 4 4,) 0.„ e.-4,r," . t l'4e 2'^' 4 q 1. v e he e;., e ' ,7/0 fit cr itve •4 a-et . Pe thea.7 i..5 t .4.1)t,fileitte.1 ,42.111.41 4)14704 7/6 4 id'114/''e:'- r E/4914eeti'erice) IS i 0 vie fle86(, el, //ft 4 h i /L.,, ,,„ / er.,4 :4 L . aa('ree;,,vi-Li7 -1z-tk.-ii,4,- 4,)-? ..-(',?t,L,,t,„ e e.4a-fr? am ‘,P74S '14 et e.‘,4,iet.0,01 t , ' P ge'' t" 1 Fee4t.:-(6t. ,t,i 4 , ei,i, Y t. r • . ei.). 6 .,( ( 4 fei2eUe ...0 ,/,,Ide'e-ege,' 4otaie4 1.7e/ t41:cle. ril, - ifvf,1(:,t()1 114-ez,- i7e:ectl ../?d,:e-,) yea's- ''•7'1.-e_.,., �r, , 4:t to .-,c 4 / ,. e', :!' (4r4(1,4/ / 1 ..,746/_e. f° ', e./ • •t C / . ' 1 . U 0 441-1/-5:2-f P/94.71.7 (7-01„/ 49474 /4,4406" 774 94 ter. Q4 1 ,, R T d ,p704, 94 74 74% '447 741* —'4'87 49 ,. ., y a"a 974-7 67" -1.7-1*;;;;4,91:03:9 (79 � >x,.*a-. .3an f...;a.rF 1�:..Ata,�.-.... ..,,..:.,.v. lin..ti�A T..;::.,a..I...ir.,n.ylk; v+'a .�'.'>•�.,r..11.._._ ..i_ w. .,c.e w.:. ...?.w:..,-..-�..._.a..M:.. n-,.,+, w.r F.. .k»..i.,.rfry' ...AA,..Wl.+...-...w..n✓+.F.'.iw-,,,.�,tao-.�.k-..M.nu .uu+'rlpa+Y.1. 1 l • • • • , ker& 6I 7�G �� r � I ti I 1 I I . r tI I • AND ASSOQATES9 c JNTERNA'[TONAL BUSINESS•'T'RA DE• ZKETJNG CONSULTANTGROUPS September 3, 1986 Mr. Bill Monahan, Director Department of Planning and Development City of Tigard P. 0. Box 23397 ' Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Bill: . - Enclosed is a copy of the traffic impact analysis regarding the proposed access relocation for the Wayside Inn. As you will recall, the proposal calls for the construction of a new access drive to the midpoint in the property so that the following can occur: 1. Improved access to the site. 2. The of O q g ., and conference S space. 00� s . ft. of meeting • p 3. Improved circulation on -sitea ' Final approval for the project will come from ODOT, however, a positive recommendation from the city is required in order to proceed. As you know, we vi ew this access project and the construction of meeting space as having _a significant economic impact on the operation of the Wayside Inn. We look , forward to your continued support in this project, subsequent to a review by staff of the enclosed information. , The support and cooperation we have received from the planning stafr is greatly appreciated. I will be calling you next week t. a' -we a y questions You might have S . • /, M.ty MSD/dh a US 13ANCO.111'TOWER,11 S,W.PUTh Ave,,Suike 4150,Pot•tlhnd,OR 972O4-3696 CJ,S,A. (5105) 0 Tekoc 360 828 H w w . Kalb . , ,� • • • • •„ -i, Ct ...,,�:,:..w_...,n....... ..... u..,M....:i ... ! .,.,x.. .,al. ..a. �,. I • .cF`•?s, ',t�76/rte ....:-•,.. i.� 1 A, ' S I.r 4 ,ir ,• 1ANSPDRTATIoN . ,,r r , , ,„.„..:,,,,,.., .0...4 ,,,, . . . , , . , , , , : , , : , , , ., , ,.,,,,.: • GINEERING ti ,��r 4 ,`!,, ANNING, INCH ; i , r, , i D r . , I • r • . ' I • . COPY PP a ' T': A O(),1A ED ` HA SFe— 11TATION ENGINEERING 8t PLANNRN , IN , .. • •a . ' ySy� ✓ • • • • TRANSPOP "AT I ON AtUAL,YS I W rYSIDE INt4 • T'I GA RI".)o OREGON • • • • ■ I , • PREPAkED FOR W A Y W L E � F'OPTLLAND y OREGON ' r • 1 • ' :.fir � ,� �I l �. ti D L 1140 •„ I PREPARE ASV AB8OC I A`i b TRANSPt R `AT x Girl ENG I NE'Ef I NG 0,1 PLANNING IOC C /6016 G a W a GGGNEG FEF RY kOAO L:A!4 tiSWEGt)7 OR b i97034 s., G6-2 a ALIGLIGT i986 n , COP'YP C3HT: ASSOCIATED THAN POI _ � T'�4T�C�1� ���I��CI'l G & F'L,ANNINU y INC� • Sp ^ , t I• TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS OF THE WAYSIDE INN LOCATED IIV • • T I GAR , OREGON • INTRODUCTION This report represents the findings of a t�- ;�, of an existing �. �►catedican analysis p p x � g 14 room hotel/motel complex on Pacific Highway in Tigard Oregon. of this transportation assess' kh The Purpose s tr-anspol rata.on anal ysi s i� to the ,. transportation Highway impacts of changing 'the driveway apps oach to a 99 and the, addition of 1(»,,0 0 square feet of meeting rooms will h ave Cr the existing read system. The appendices to • this report contain a summary of all key technical calculations and field data collected as part of this traffic analysis. ' 7 EX I S"i"I H(� CONDITIONS � ; (,1 STUDY AREA LOCATION x east g ae existing site is located on south side of Pacific Highway ated o east of 69th Ave and west of the 1-5 onram i p in the City df Ti gar-d,oregonM The current use for the property is as a 114 room hotel/motel and the existing development currently takes access from Pacific access Highway to the north and though rough the oint driveways of the adjacent restaurants to 69th Ave» Pacific Highway i designated 9 -y s 9 as a major arterial street t, - connecting the City Of Tigard with the suburban areas to the south (i Newberg beg ad McMi nvi l l e) Pacific Highway at the existing driveway lane roadway with 2 through lanes e ach direction and a conti nuous left turn lane. • 69th`Ave is currently under construction to the south to tonnect , tc 68th Ave in the Tigard Triangle» The connection i s designed • as a (2) lane roadway with no parking allowed on either sides o+ the street. 69th Ave will serve as an north asoUth co l� ectbr street between Paci f i Highway and the Tigard Triangle area to 1 the south. The existing driveway is located on the east property line of the , development and is currently a ri ght turn in and right turn out �. driveway. i A8EcC I ATED TI,AI\I3I'bkTAT I oN rNoxNERINo & PLANN I CIO y 1 NC,, page v r ... ..._ a.,, .,..,.. i... ... .,I .,...w r via. .H .n,.e„mrai ,,.,,v a•on:raN,a ir..S ., n �' • ti ' ., ,../ .•-w,lw+.. .,'_. ..a-im':. .«.+w.C.:.J•. .. ..• tiw,.. .7•'v1••v.w. .a.a`.C.An. al.xw.+... +ww4lMev,> v .....t F..r'a.,..w.hF.r- .:1.aR7..,„41,.,au'l'..,i•u„frzlNN',i:i - I The proposed driveway is to be, located approximately mid-point of , '., the property� nd be configured as shown i n E,h i b i t 1 This will . v. : allow for left turning vehicles into the site but restrict left turrns from m the site., (MOTE. ) It should be noted that the existing right turn in and right turn out driveway veway is s currently being vi o1 ated ' duri ng most ,• • ire observed during the pm peak:; hour times of the day. Vehicles w�• • turning left across 'Hwy 99 into the site from the east. ; , N This proposal would allow that left t tur n into the site. 1 . • CONTROL TRAFFIC �! The intersection of Pacific Highway and 69th Ave is currently ' si.final i z•ed and operates as an actuated signal with . • i rrter-corir ect. All other roadways and driveways within; the area 1 are controlled by atop signs. ., TRAFFIC VOLum Where no available vai1able traffic�' c volumes were available, ATEF` performed . a number" of additional automatic tr aff i n counts during August of •, • • Ft)y c yt In order to estimate evening peak-hour turning movement patterns I • at the intersection of Pacific Highway and 69th Ave. ATEP ' ,,, •� '', p°r 1`cir m d s number of "m rnual turning movement counts • "� d during:c rig t the rrir"id Om peek h iur s These counts c1 .zs±fied all traffic • approach i'r c the intersection according to the type of movement , (left-turn through t or right-turn) , E,•chi,bit `. is A summary 04 r these counts. Based on the results a4 these counts.)s J it was concluded t- t the weekday evening Peak' hour of traffic flaw within'' this area ' occurs from 4: 45 to 5: 45 p,m. and constitutes about 09 percent of the recorded weekday traffic volume Since the weekday • evening peat; hov'N is also the time when the impact of the traffic goner aced by the pr eased deuel opment will be greatest y h is was 1 '• the time that was used in all subsequent analyses, Fast ,. p centr:.'r iraf i c' by itself may be lighter t radur during thetetistin motel peak hour faie combination cf normal 8krid motel-traffic is maximum during the weekday evening Peak for commuting home-to-work tripa. CURRENT LEVELS O Level of Service (Lt ) i e s cwohcept devel I p sd to quantify the degree if comfort afforded to drivers vers as they travel through an ' intersection or roadway segrrie a4,. This degree of comfort i nc1 udoE such elements as travel time, number of stops, total amount of a stripped del Ay ii and impedances caused by other Vehicles, As 1° originally defined with the 1965 Hi ghw ly OagAt i,tF ! Manual ,,, •�{, tkeference ,` ) sIX g rI a dr��s are Used tO denote the various LOS; the g rg ade� aro shr�)var,► in 4r`4tbl e I 1. Lz'Ing this def i ni.ti cn; i t ip "t�S r ,. s " ` ` l l'1 ,.»•/ » ,.N, lu..l/9'a C•�',I,1\11'.:.'C«•I` �I�I ! tH 7: !"6f b a"1 l e ,l l i:]'J•N(':,Ij .1,l',1( 1 1:.,..,t;1.1,j S� •.. .,1 • •,1 ( 1 • 0 A. . •� �. ,• • r • _,..+ I r• rA „w .,,,,n ,f' ` • ��•. `,.,.�+K Ar/'.. t_ 1�' ,..+N nlr, 'µ,,,,,..�'✓ 4l Si.w,t ,•r., 1,11 JS„I•„;. . 1v', '' 3 `�1 ` -"K�r 7”{ . 1 4 r'-r'r ,Arw% '.xJtl 0 \jr{Nr b'1 \ 4.,,!:,;!!M('VJ,j,r Yt 1 - , a �r✓S F tlrr, 4T t�! o b c D\ \ , N �'S;'alt`•1�� ,t t A +: .� 1 �.✓ of s 9 .,, ��>:, •h , , I , , w r 4 .. f e.f 1 4 \ I r t .y} a' a,9•`,.1+R-t. f✓1j ' $ 4" '.• , y \ , 0 ,`';',.'.7,,,,,.'.t t ; b fret,3,:,..',,..:4.7 „..SAt 1lv,,,4 ,,, •/ ,■ �h `* h•1 t•' .74•11,‘'' ( • tx �Y_I t w'`. ''1 �•, 1 1 ,, 1, , ,C1 / ',tJ/ / �r I t�, '; ~~.`'••,1 h ,,, 1 \ ,p 'n r j,, •, ,,/,, /,/srf / . 2 . 1t ' \f�. G;, C ti t / u •�$ '/:"., ,� \ ham Z 1 / i , t , v^1l 1 / 1 1't •1,, v• ( k 11 !, ' r r , ,1 ii t y ro • A t. + 1 ■ w ry 1 w ✓ ,r , .M p • , ,I 1 , , . r C "1 4 ) , � i., ,.:'i .. ..A..«..wti .a w.Y•••••.i../Y,....I'4+:a+,,.,o'+.A.Lc .i;nJ: .,:..a.dt.44.<�.n•a�,:.r.wr..0 l..d.i tii.:xui...'+..auiv>.u4r.-r.�;-.•.wawa:.n+w�'•v.+.u.ci,r...,wKxr:«wf.w.ui.,u,;•.IKrM•,-•k, ..u-_i,.,-..,,..;♦...-.-,.� ,..ti...,,+ur..-.u.... a a.....-.,n....r•:«..w�.✓.,u or,4...,.,lkrz;..,w.«..au....,,-atFw.. w, �..at-,.,.,;;.;.mw W? ..k4 • I 1 IAI , • • 11 • 010 ' 9.14 ^I � w ry • to /a i • 3 (46)'—'.'"*"7"'',14, - (ii)9 . I r 51,"f E 1 'DF►IVEW y ANALYSIS • • •• • • , WAYS rde 31,.Irs1 , I • 15T114&11444 1 A . rice y� • ,Wiar7 • 1i .• AM PEAK OUP, ()(x) • 'FM' P ) aChu t2, !.$ �V T. • • • • • • • yy er a-wH sus♦, e 1 , I A • • i 42 • �J I. e..iJ... ...1. ,....._.w .,1..»..n.. .:.Y;.J•.Y.,,.0 .Iw x,:11wrM.Y-.1... .,. ..wY•.+n..7-rS:.;i:it'... ...+. - N generally p �I �, �� �� � is minimum acceptable for an • . ..r, �L�S i s the min :, gtrban area.a reed that I7 L �� ,(": For the ur - oses of this analysis, the assumed relationship between the calculated volume/capacity ratio for the intersection and the associated LOS is given in Table 2 All LOS analyses p resented in this report were performed in `accc rdarce wi th the procedures described above. For each ? intersection, these analyses estimate the overall intersection LOS during the peak he r f i ow of the pm peak hour. Crapi a of y p contained in the aendi the an�J. �z s outputs are cbnt��,n� pp Table i ' LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS (SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS) . Level of Service Traffic Flow Characteristics Average a overal l travel speeds of 30 mph or more. A g p Free-flowing with no c ong estc,n. No signal cycle failures. Average overall travel speeds of 25-30 mph. Very _w signal al c c le failures and little or no f congestion. • I , C' Average � � � s of 2�>-2 r mph, g over��ll travel speeds 1 Occasional signal cycle failures and associated . congestion . ) D Average overall .;travel speeds of lb 2c,' mph. Frequent signal cycle failures and associated congestion. I , " �`vera e overall travel ail speeds of about 15 mph d Unstable flow which includes almost continuous zignal cycle a l ures and backups on approaches to t he intersections. This represents the theoretical capacity of the facility. F Forced flow, with average overall travel speeds below 1 5 m p h Continuous signal cycle le tai lUre with , .• , backup on approaches s going through upstream : intersections in some cases. Notch A 'signal cycle failure is con 'i dered to occur when one c►r more. Vehicles are forced to wait through •,, ., more than one green signal i nJi cati inn for a r particular approach. ASSbr :AT! 1 TRAN PURTA1 I til l PLANN I NO F i t...e 4 e 4 J r„ ..,ff ,k„....:._. :. u,,.a.0 ., -.! „-M•.a..,r,.M Y•A,d.,+.« '..-e. -N.k. n,1,J+:.:.w w,...•.14.:.w.1xF--.u.w.,Hwt 14A.,x..hi-!`L,,..w...,x-M,C,...+%rA,,,..A.:rl.:Ar±Jr'xA11:4FJ,dNnWlCni+A1{%4. • Table 2 r �, CFA I TER l A FOR SIGNALIZED 1 hJTERSECT x ON � • • w { , Stopped • LOS Delay ts i d l e (sec. ) A4 . . 1 15.,0 • c 15. 1 25.0 I D 5. 1 - 40.C) I. 40. 1 - 60.0 R. 6Or 0 1 ' Table 3 l . .. ' EXISTING LEVELS OF SERVICE AT CS I I I p INTERSECTIONS�C�� • D LOS STOPPED DELAY .Intersection �. ° Pacific Highway and 69th Ave. � + 10. 16 SEC I Pacific Highway and Wayside Driveway B 11.53 SEC r T I P GENERATION •c . Es t irnatil rig the number of vehicle trip ends that will be generated p nce to the City of by the. proposed devel oprnent is ©f pra.me i m c�rt� • Tigard and to Oregon Department of Transportation can (ODtJT) . Two baSi c procedures are available to traffic engineers for • estimating the number cf driveway vehicle tri p% generated by a an existing development A 1. Apply averages observed through field studies conducted 1 • by other si mi 1 ar f aci 1 i ti es 1 ocated thr oLighout the Igni ted • ••� States. A' nL mber� of si urces are available for this information, including Trip Generation Manual (3rd Edition) , which is published shed 1 by ti-r�: Institute of Transportation Engineers t i""E y ; and • 1 summary trip generat xsn ye p e �s Prepared by the California 1 Department of Transportation, the Ari2c:rna Department of Tranbportatiang and other public transportation agencies'. All oaf these s ources....provide excell ent guidance in est .mating the trip generation rates for various land uses, but obviously do not take { • in to account the e,ff eats of local conditions and' unique w e character.t ti cs of the proposed land use. Observe through f x el d studies the actual trip generation charatteri Sty.cs of other similar and existing developments f within ,' the local area. ASSOCIATED `f RANlaoRTAT X GN GNG X N R I Nt PLANN I N(3, INCH PA Q0 e a ♦ M r ° • r ' u rel l.._tv .1 .+... .... +....... ea_ ..,.n rr...,4.... ....A...Y wn. wnN x•.r ..ur n+aria.. .. n «.rw w ✓ Only Procedure one above was used i n the development of this , Y P p • ' or report. Table 4 bel ow,i denti f i es the expected number of � vehicle . trip ends to be generated by this existing development on both a p daily and pm peak hour basis. The trip generation developed for , this report is based on the past occupancy records provided by the client. The average occupancy rate fors` this motel is approximately '6OX . Since section .320 of the. 1TE Manual does not include Motel complexes with meeting r o am s, Section 1 C Hotel w as used in the determination of the Trip! Generation.. e Table TRIP GENERATION COMP A,l SON FOR PROPOSED EXPANSION GENERATION Generated Trips (13) size of P.M. Peak Hour ' LandUse .r.«.•..:r«r««,« .««:rY«...--w -...�� ». Land Use (UNITS) (A) nails/ Total In Out a Er;idting 114 876 fib 28 29 , Wimeeting rooms 114 907 63 31 32 1 NE'1 ADDlTIUNAL.: TRIP' • ENDS • GENERATED BY THE SITE (C) 31 7 3 3 • s . wMw...w:ir.•....«..:ii.N«.14M ea:l�r«r:•W wr r.r«r..:w«r«•««.:rir+•««rrr:we.Jrw.M«..+r c.«:r:::rr rriw. ' � w..r•W:irr.rrwir:i'«ii.rrw.nYr.�.rYi.rYaM YW iww iYY:w..wwrr wi:irY lr1.«`r N.4 NOTES. • • 9' A. UNITS=t total number of roome B. Includes both inbound and outbound tripe • C. Assumes that the difference in the ITE Generation rates will' apply to this expansion of the Motel Compl ex, Thr s assumes _that ' the addi't:ional trips generated by the site will be new: trpsa For the ur~ cafes of thi s' analysis,s, i t i s assumed that pane of the p p Motel related person trips will be made by mass transit, And that J only 10 percent cast: the work red:Ated person trips will be made by • mass transit This assumption ignores the Metropolitan -Servi de w :nt projection that 4-6 percent of all home , based�personmtN-i' sef for purposes oses unrelated: , to word. will l ire made by e p P� p , assumption tends to cause the final sir� w too reflect arworst—case condition, Ahd overestimate • i m acts associated with this development r'i 9 rem �ima e he traffxd p TRIP DISTRIBUTION Within t trti o of generated tr'`i p onto the roadway system area was determined by reviewing the arojett , market area and the distribution f e:.isting traffic in the area See Exhibits x through ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION ENSIN5ra'IRING & �� t INC.. 1"L~f" Flll � Page . • . I' I • r.Y,.,.«.:.i:A4 a .a.A,_i., +..,Pwla„p.uvu,v.uuexu...a.1..._ .+.i.I. 4N-'•.114. L ,,.A I:,i.40 ,.,..i:� ..M,..,r+:.. .r.l.�..-I.,....f.K r..t.::... .,.._fil. ...,-tir.. I.JtKw.aXInJl,::41. ,.'n+rM.«+ „w,.+a.i�4..rr.,.,�.Mr.,-wiw7L•.,�. Y ,. 1, {4..• • 1 • 1 l'f y • , 4 11.• ' ) ' (21 pr u 1 . I' \'',144'e s i DE 1 IJ N i , 1 1 ti i 1 'T I 1 4 el-r5, FJ5R►A EG PFIC . FUI4LIF , . o f «Vr'Y AMP a t� E x L M • , .. , ''!i., ..�.. .r• ..«.....,. 1..Y... ; `,.. ;«, .,, ..� „m.i, ,In,.. nr . .•'I Vii�n \.., w .N. �� ,4 ..4.. ..A� ,,i,.'w..,4,L..t...h.,...1.,,+r..•,.-n.W...Ir M,ti.��.,N.wl.-.,octiN7 .A1..,u,._•,:AI......�...,,,,:4...iw„_..:.,M...v,..,,,,!.G,....,....., .:........M.........•41..C._r•..-,.1.,«....i w.�... , .,.«...a. . , : .r 4 ' Y • • r ,'t ' I s' N r i 1l, ( t . 5 TE se NIE F A-i' .W► TPAPFic y FUTUP)E • P►iV�'A'ir' AM PEAK t1dui t ,ic) • • r M PEI,k 1hI oUFti %)t a,, r ` 4 a • i 1 v: • T 0 • • • 1 .t,{s..„,„ .wtlb}n:lb.Y..�„.�..A�a�l,,,”,Yam. ,�..l�w rx,.+��d��,n..�-r.,.m..+.}4.lHx...nK,—.t�,r+„ ,...„ -J..r ...,�,+i+tuaa+ww�4LAWw:3.a.;{C1� , ...,�.,,.-.�,... ..,.;:,:. ,.._•x.._., ,. »,. ...;�•...,..,,,.;�,».dl_,.,aati....�..d...�„�I a�•...�.,..i..,,.»..,.a.,.,.,.�.. a�. six r • • * G 931 tto) 1 5 C ti 0 1 • { I I s1 r • �1V are s 15 (4,)9 d ,A, ,fix. � � : 'OTAL T ,AF..FIc. nd i AM PEAlc '+ OUP, (x vi) m PeAk oUl X?» ;.r ra Q 6A d 1 . I � } 1 -f XI:. • I I ,.�.:- :.� . :.,.. '.,,,. .'...iii....�........................:.,.... .. .....� i,..�.,.,..N_� r � (' ' • r CONCLUSIONS i . , ,,. 1. The existing i ntersecti ans ��trrentl y bperr ate at a level, of Service C or better. 2. The existing right turn in and right turn out driveway is • violated being during n 9 the pm peak hour., • 3. The moving of the driveway to the mid-point of the property will not cr-eate additional congestion to the site. 4. The moving of the driveway to the mid'.-point of the property y . . a 1 allows for better on-site access and circulation in to the parking bats. . addition of meeting n rooms to t • 5. The 'addx g the site will not add a �. significant number of vehicle cle'' trips to the surrounding street system. R COMMENDAT I ONO Based on the results of the traffic impact analysis described in . this concluded p '" � '� expansion the existing t!~rx s re or t i t �� ded that the �►.. ' development can be achieved with minimalrrimpact on the • existing g street system and traffic,' flow patterns. ' To ensure the safe ovement of traf efficient traffic and e and efficient pedestrians within the area, the following trwaff i c operational i i mprbveme,its` Are 'recommended. 1) A exclusive right turn lane be i netal i ed on ,the south side of Pacific Highway into the site 2) The existing driveway into I the site be relocated , approximately 120 foot to the west. 3) The driveway be configured as shown on Exhibit l to allow the left turns into the site from the east. 4) Thtat when the extension of 68th/69th is complete an additional driveway' be created to the connect directly to the south. AS tC I A y Et TR N5 t .Tr T r O NG I r�E I w 8, N n • x 1 . 1; i ,Y • so lo I r "ll`1 .. 7T C'f It*►II'.a� "D 'F i T' I C311%1 -IrlaicHIN XCAS,_.. , +i:::' NDI , 0 • , r I • • f I • , is I • • CC i 4 .. 1. OPYAI `HT: ASSOCIAlaED ThAN POkTATION ENGINEEF iII G . PLA►I NIN( INC. u I • t z ,+.+w..7.1 z.. xM, ..K,z....,u...a u,i.. a,, r=J xrN ,x. ,.aAdd1...,�3.ry�:*-.dta,.UaL1 H'T. ,,«.1.Fa.l•Ip..a,xw«,II......�J.u+.. ..uw.w_L+r.:za-,+c,.wu.. .J.,auuwy.,—us.',w•w..tAS,.naNru e.1a: . ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING, INC TRIP GENERATION ANALYSIS FOR : WAYSIDE INN ' • ITE SECTION USED: 310 . TOTAL UNITS 60% OCCUP 86.4 SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION CALCULATION ADJ INDEP VAR TOTAL TRIPS ADJ TRIPS f*******'***i******************* ****'4****its 1 0.5 907.2 E AW�1TE AM TRIPS 0.85 73 I r IN 05 8 0.57 49 I , . OUT 0.29 0.28 24 PM TRIPS 0.73 63 IN 0.36 0.36 31 OUT 0.37 0.37 32 ` I: I ;I I TRIP DISTRIBUTION I I 1 S= E= W= 0.05 0.5 0.25 0.2 TOTAL AM 4 37 18 15 73 IN 2 24 12 10 49 OUT i 12 6 5 24 , ***4*4114*********41*********************x'44*#* '*** IPM TRIPS 3 I I 32 16 13 1 63 IN 2 16 B 6 31 OUT 2 16 8 6 32 *44'****4*4**1.*****4'*444***a** • i � III I I , I , • •4f • {I. •uu.✓Lc .,,,.t',o-,:.:. _.._.,.,:.....•,• .,-._......;..-.::.r.,. .u...-.,.w..,.,..•:1�...:.,•,1....;:n:d"r.a..u.a,.d:...a..>.....r.i;:s,,..r,..w,+:::.ca.....,:....,:a{.r,,...w.;.::;:;u,.—,.4,.,=+:ti.11;'s:.ara;•.:::.;c.cr:«.;n...:.:t-r.it :.W..,...t ta..i::::A4 J,.tlkt�.«:i:..:.U:w.:;�....roa-x..,.r,.m..x - , ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING,' INC ' . TRIP GENERATION' ANALYSIS FOR WAYSIDE INN ITE SECTION USED g' 320 TOTAL UNITS 6O"/ OCCUF' 86.4 SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION CALCULATION ADJ I NDEF' VAR TOTAL TRIPS AD3 TRIPS • AWYTE 10.. 14 876.096 + w . AM TRIPS O 14 64 IN 0.5 0.49 4 OUT 2 0.25 2 PM TRIPS 0.65 H 56 IN 0.32 0.32 .2B • OUT ' 0.33 �r � 2 r•� • . 'TRIP DISTRIBUTION S= E= W 0„0"" 0 S 0. 5 0.2 TOTAL .** •+•*• : 44•x •• • * •*• • ***** ***, .* *. ***** •44.x.*******• • •*• •• AM ,' 16 13 64 IN 2 21 11 7 43 t 5 N ., 'PM ,TRIP I i 1 14 71' 6 28 • OUT 1 14 7 6 29 y N { yy 1955 HCI.1 CHAPTER 10 UNSIGNALIIED - 3 APPROACHES (PAGE 1 of 2) DATE:0G-20.198 TIME:08:30:14 WAYSIDE INN DRWY A44.412.. ' LAST DATASETS LOADED OR SAVED GEONETRIC5� C I . GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS POPULATION GREATER THAN 250,000: YES CONTROLS: FROM C: STOP FROM C RT LANE: • STOP PREVAILING SPEED: 35 MPH r MAIN STREET t OF LANES: 4 LANES MAIN STREET APPROACH A - :EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANE: Y MINOR STREET LANES APPROACH: C: WAYSIDE ORdWY o ,. SHARED LEFT AND RIGHT TURN LANE; NO U SHALLOW RIGHT TURN RADI S UR ALLO N N RIGHT TURN ANGLE: ND RIGHT TURN ACCELERATION LANE ON MAJOR: NO SIGHT DISTANCE RESTRICTIONS (in seconds) r APPROACH A: N HWY 99 D: E HWY 99 C: WAYSIDE DRW LEFTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 THROB 0.00 0.00 0.00 , RIGHTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 A `(IC14 Al A. W HWY 99 . E HWY 99 C. WAYSIDE DRW LT TH RT LT TN RT LT TH RT VOLUME 0 1483 21 4 1952 0 0 0 12 PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 ADJ VOLUME 0 1745 25 5 2296 0 0 0 14 PERCENT GRADE 2.00 -2,00 4.00 PASS CAR/HR 0 5 0 0 24 STEP 1 RIGHT TURNS FROM C WAYSIDE DRWY , CONFLICTING FLOWS 872 CRITICAL GAPS 5.2 CAPACITV 453 ACT1hAL'CAPACITY 45 STEP 2 LEFT TURNS FROM B:E HWY 99 CONFLICTING FLOWS 1745 CRITICAL GAPS 5.1 CAPACITY 184 '-'03r- CAPACITY USED 3% IMPEDANCE FACTOR 0,99 ACTUAL CAPACITY 184 , 4 r i I ;l '• + ti,L r fl, 1 n rrl j„ f I 1 1985 HCM W CHAPTER 10 • UNSIGNALIZED - 3 APPROACHES (PAGE 2 of 2) DATE:OG-20-1986 TIME:08 30:14 • WAYSIDE INN ORWY • ` `r - 3 LEFT TURNS FROM C:WAYSIDE DRWY • CONFLICTING FLOWS 4058 CRITICAL GAPS 6.8 1vAPACITY 3 ACTUAL CAPACITY 3 r , • SUMMARY OF LEVEL OF SERVICE BY MOVEMENT MOVEMENT DEMAND CAPACITY RESERVE LOS AVG DEL(SECI AVG QUEUE . LT FROM 8: 5 184 179 D 20.09 0.03 . RT FROM C, 24 453 429 A 8.40 0.00 ' • • • • • I . , I L • • .7; l , I 1 { • i } I I • M V i , ............ ...., ._i<..., .. , .ek, Jx .4. ..:4,.A1... ._... ......«.. .w.L.,;+.raw .. ...ri.;UA ..I.c..-.«1.... .. ..w.,.,.a .c. .-.w.J.d..m .NU. ......4....::.Qt� • 1985 HIGHWAY CAPACITY PROCEDURE PLANNING ANPLVSI5 . PROJECT: WAYSIDE INN INTERSECTION; PACIFIC HWY AND 69TH AVE ( DESIGN DAY, EXISTING AEq • GEOM E TRY . .. II Ha. of No. of No. o'r, No. of No. of No. of Lt. Lt.&Th. Thru Rk.&Th. Rt. RtTh,&Lt. • Approach Lanes Lanes • pproach -Lanes Lanes r Lanes Lanes ` Land EB 1 U 1 i 0 0 NB 1 0 1 1 0 0 NB 0 0 0 a 0 1 SB 0 0 0 0 0 1 TRAFFIC Right VOLUMES----- Left Ri II Turn Thru Turn Total ' ER 37 996 22 1055 I . NB 22 1668 >43 1733 NB 41 2 6 49 SB 121 2 15 138 LANE DISTRIBUTION FOR SHARED LEFTlfHRU LANES ON A MULTILANE APPROACH WITH PERMISSIVE LEFT TURN LANES (OPTIONAL WORKSHEET) W-1- Vo LT Total No. of Eauiv. Thru Vol. In Vol. In Opposing EOUIV Voluoe Lanes On Volume Vehicles LT+TH Ea. Of The Volume PCEtt V1t PCE's (TH+RT) Total Approach Per Lane in Lane Remaining • (vph) Lane Lanes • 1711 5 37 185 1018 1203 2 602 417 454 602 101E 5 22 110 1711 1821 2 911 801 823 911 y, 17 1.1 41 451 8 53.1 1 53 0 0 53 e 1.1 121 133.1 17 150.1 1 150 0 0 150 • PCE Lookup Table 0 -199 1.1 200 -599 2 , 600 -799 3 800 -999 4 1000 & up 5 e •� r , SB LT- 37 NB LTz` 0 » N1) TN(RT= 956 68 TH&RT~ 150 • , BUM- 893 SUM_ 150 IWB LT= 22 8B IT: 80 W E1) TN1lRTw- 509 NB TH&E`iT_ 53 I 5UII 531 8UM= 133 • I MAkIMUM BUM OF CRITICAL VOLUMED= i(43 LOB = B Right rurri Check OK • ,.tr.-» ,.r m.... „1,.1. 13,wa..r..J.. ,...:1'1..... ... .N-.1..F.Ix4/.'..I n.Ca#„a . .„k, ✓R.,�,i4a. .N «?M✓i..{f.tie w. rl?3:M1aXk...41a.V.YaF Aa.C.Irr,:1Y4:Nn..NF.:.WA 1985 HIGHWAY CAPACITY PROCEDURE PLANNING ANALYSIS PROJECT: WAY LEE , j,,TRET : a NESCION HWY 6 AND RTH DESIGN DAY: PM PEAK HOUR GEOMETRY • No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of Lt. Lt.&Th. Thru Rt.&Th. Rt. Rt,Th,&Lt Approach Lanes ' Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes EB 1 1 1 0 0 NB SB 0 0 0 0 0 1 ; ES -----TRAFFIC VOLUMES M Left Right` Turn Thru Turn Total EB 50 1856 46 1952 • NB 51 . 1384 B3 1518 NB 74 15 12 101 56 87, 8 26 121 LANE DISTRIBUTION FOR SHARED'LEFTITHRU LANES ON A MULTILANE APPROACH (� WITH PERMISSIVE LEFT TURN LANES (OPTIONAL WORKSHEET) Vo LT Total No. of Equiv. Thru Vol, In Vol. In I Opposing EOUIV` Volume Lanes On Volume Vehicles LT•+TH Ea. Of The . ,,a Volume PCEI t Vit PCE's (TH+RT) Total Approach Per Lane in LT+TH Lane Remaining (vi)hl Lane Lanes 1467 5 50 250 1902 2152 2 5 1076 826 876 1076 1902 _5 51 255 1467 1722 2 861 606 657 861 34 1.1 74 81 4 27 108.4 1 108 0 0 108 27 1.1 87 95.7 34 129.7 1 130 0 0 130: PCE Looku p Table 0 -199 1.1 200 -599 2 • 600 -799 800 -999 4 I. 1000 & up 5 ---------- . . CALCULATIONS or STATUS-- I_ a B EB LT= 50 NB LT 0 NB TH&RT= 734 5B TH&RT 130 l • SUM= 784 SUN= 130 h NB LT:.' 51 "8 LT= 13 EB TH&IZT= 951 NB TH&RT= 1011 Still= 1002 SUMS 121 SUM OF x1 llb M' I" CRITICAL O 11A hl I V LIJMES= 1132 LOS iht`Tur=n Check OK g a { ° 1985 HIG•WAY CAPACITY PROCEDURE PLAt,ININS ANALYSIS 1 . • PROJECT: WAYSIDE INN INTERSECTION: PACIFIC HWY AND 69TH AVE 'OESIBN DAY, I'11i,nL TRAFFIC AM , GEOMETRY u No._ of No. of No, of No of No. of No. of • Lt. Lt.&Th. T h r u Rt & Th. fit. R t ,T h ,&L t 4 •Approach Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes • -0 EB I 0 1 1 0 0 i t!B 1 0 1 0 a NB 0 G 0 G G 1 • SB 0 0 0 0 0 1 • a TRAFFIC VOLUMES.-_-__-- I Left Right , Tu r n Thru u Turn Total I LB 37 996 , 2 j 2 105,5 ,a '. ' NB 22 1668 43 1733 • NB 46 3 6 55 SB 121 4 15 140 LANE DISTRIBUTION FOR SHARED LEFT/THRU LANES ON A MULTILANE APPROACH WITH PERMISSIVE LEFT TURN LANES (DPTIONRL WgRK.aNEET) Vo LT Total No. of Equiv. Thrt Vol. In Vol. In • . Opposing EUUIU Volume L LT f; •,° PR 9 Lanes On Valu�ae Vehicles +Tl1 Ea. Of The Volume� PCEIt Vlt PCE s iTH+RTI Total A pp roach Per Lane in LT+TN Lane Remaining ( ph) Lane Lanes 1711 5 37 185 1018 1203 2 602 417 454 602 1018 5 22 110 1711 1821 2 911 801 823 911 19 1.1 46 50►6 9 59.6 1 60 0 0 60 . • • 9 11 121 13 .1 19 152.1 1 152 0 0 152 • PCE Lookup Table 0 -199 1.1 , 200 -599 2 • 600 -799 3 4 •• • 000'-999 4 1000 & up 5 , , t EALCULATIOI�S'OF STATU6�� M.��__..,�_�.�.��__ ...._ E8 LZ- 37 Nn LT • ti • B T N ART 856 SB 152 n b SUM- E193 SUM= 152 e W B LT= 22 SB L1°= 75 • LB TH&RT, 509 NB T•&RT- 60 531 SUM= '135 S[!M i, • ' 11AXIMUN SUM OF CRITICAL VOLUHE9= 1045 LOS = A • night Turf' %.heck Ufa b ».A ' , _ o. �', .,ti:-« .:.u:w,.,U..«...u.-..., .k..,...a.':r ..,._».x.J«,,..:J'•.u^%.ud...w.a.,.i-3:.ii«+a,-.'v,=.G.,;.+.:iA.........u�r,:;+::...,,,au....,..saaw,.-,,.0 n.rs H...w..sww.:u 7,raa.x»:al+.� , • .. ..a+l.r+.,•. , .. ,..I a. - . ..N ..-.,,..4L,:»,....I F, -..fi,...-,-1{.t,w..«u-,.rl.wf+n .,L-'-„1--..ML,1-N:3w. ` ' . :”' 1985 HIGHWAY CAPACITY PROCEDURE PLANNING ANALYRIS PROJECTS WAYSIDE INN ' , x INTERSECTION: PACIFIC HWY AND 69TH AVE ? CES1 N DAY; TOTAL TRAFFIC PM • BEONETRY w- - No. of Na. of No."of No. of No of No, of /,, , Lt. Lt.&Th. Thru Rt.&Th. Rt. Rt,Th,&L . • pp Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes , Approach Lanes Lanes La ,a EB 1 0 I 1 0 0 hD 1 0 1 1 0 4 NB 0 0 0 0 0 1 , SB 0 0 0 0 0 1 -,-.--,..---------------TRAFFIC TRA FFI C V 4 LUME S °._° l Left Right Turn Thru Turn Tatal , E8 51 1384 83 1518 N8 50 1856 46 1952 NB 80 17 12 109 88 87 10 26 123 LANE DISTRIBUTION FOR SHARED LEFT/THRI! LANES ON A MULTILANE APPROACH • , ;', WITH PERMISSIVE LEFT TURN LANES (OPTIONAL WORKSHEET} a ....__,..._..W..__, --------,.,.........,-...«a..,.______-------..-.......- .,.,..,«,. ---w_. vo LT Total No; of Equiv. Thru Vol. In Vol. In Opposing EOU1V Volume Lanes On Volume Vehicles LT+TH Ea. Of The 1 ' . c Yoluoe PCEIt V1t PCE s (TH+RT) Total Approach Per Lane in LT+TH Lane Remaining • ' (vph) Lane Lanes ...+ -..-_ _-___ _p._-__..M..«I 1902 5 51 255 1467 1722 2 861 606 657 861 141,7 5 50 250 1902 2152 2 1076 826 876 1076 • t 36 1.1, 80 88 29 117 1 117 I0 0 117 a , a'° 29 1„1 87 95.7 36 131.7 1 132 0 0 132 ' W, p PCE Laoku T 4ble , 0 -195 1.1 , 200 x-5 600 `-7'999 9 : ' 800 -999 4 1000 & up 5 k • . ,t ------------ Cca!',,ULATIDNS OF STATUS- ..w........-.. I . • ' EB LT= 51 NB LT= 0 '; WB THtiRT= 151 SB THI4RT= 132 '1 SUM= 1002 SUM= 132 • WO LT= 50 SB LT= 7 ER TH&RTt 734 NB TH`wRT= _117 8UN: 784 NUM= 124 . I M I� M I U SUM OP CRITICAL VOLUMES= 1; 13q LOB = C i Right Turn ChEu:k 0 ' , .1 ,‘ - t 1 .m ..� •r.�.u.,.. «»uk. N:T,t,.v..�,,., ..,w•rou:.=4a.- ._...u.n.-..�,,_._,.xv.utx t.-•vna,.,r; .. .t 1 • , 1985 HCM CHAPTER 10 : 'l1NSI6NALI1ED - 3 APPROACHES iPAGE 1 of 2) . DATE:O8-2O-1986 TIt9E:08.33:05 WAYSIDE INN DRHY ' orpA:, °f" ,., Pit\1 - 414 DATASETS LOADED OR SAVED 1 VOLUME= GEOPIETRICS KEY: A- -B I r. C GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS POPULATION GREATER THAN 250,000: YES CONTROLS; FROM C: STOP FRDM C RT LANE: STOP 4 PREVAILING SPEED: 35 MPH MAIN STREET * OF LANES: 4 LANES MAIN STREET APPROACH A'- EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANE: V MINOR STREET LANES APPROACH: C WAYSIDE DRWY SHARED LEFT rA??D RIGHT TURN LANE: NO • LARGE RIGHT TURN RADIUS OR SHALLOW RIGHT TURN ANGLE: NO . • • RIGHT TURN ACCELERATION LANE OH MAJOR: NO . SIGHT DISTANCE RESTRICTIONS tin seconds) APPROACH A: N HWY 99 B: E HWY 99 C: WAYSIDE DRW 4 LEFTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 _ THR US 0.0 0 0.00 0.00 RIGHTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 ' . APPROACH '. A: N HWY 99 B: E';HOY 99 C: WAYSIDE DRS' LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT VOLUME 0 1483 6 8 1952 0 0 0 8 PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 ADJ VOLUME 0 1745` 7 9 2296 0 0 0 9 , . PERCENT GRADE 2.00 -2.00 4.00 , A ' PASS CAR/HR 0 9 0 0 16 , "• CbNFRGTL5 FROM C. 8IU E DRIi1 • LICTING FLOWS 872 CRITICAL GAPS I 5.2 ,; CAPACITY 453 ACTUAL CAPACITY 453 w is STEP 2 LEFT TURNS FROM B:E HWY 99 '; CONFLICTING FLOWS 1745 GRIT uAl GAPS 1 5.1 . CAPAACITY 104 Ci,PACITY USED M% • 1 fiMPEDANCE FACTOR 0.97 ,, a ACTUAL CAPACITY 15 i i n lll , n 1 ( • I , b �_L.u... . S: A 4.3, .71,. tN AI 1995 HCM CHAPTER 10 : UNSIGNALIIED - 3 APPROACHES (PAGE 2 of 2) DATE 0B-20-1986 TIME:08:33:05 • WAYSIDE INN ORWY 3 LEFT TURNS FROM C:WAYSIDE ORWY CONFLICTING FLOWS 4054 • CRITICAL GAPS 6.8' CAPACITY 3 ACTUAL CAPACITY 3 SUMMARY OF LEVEL OF SERVICE BY MOVEMENT • MOVEMENT DEMAND CAPACITY RESERVE LOS AVG DELISEC) AVG QUEUE ' LT FROM B: 9 184 174 0 20,43 3 0.05 i '. RT FROM C: 16 453 437 A • 8.24 0.00 • • • • • 4 � I } itII a —I r is I I } f fir, ; ' • ..r f _ A1 n • • ,. .� • 0 • • STOPPED DELAY CALCULATIONS AVERAGE DELAY: 13.55 TOTAL VOLUME 3692 { • STOPPED DELAY: = •((DELAY/VOL) * 3600)/1.3 = 10.16'334 • • • LOS E ` • fi• • • LEVEL,OF SERVICE CRITERIA I • STOPPED DELAY } LEVEL OF SERVICE PER VEHICLE • • A X5.0 B 5.1 - 1 . 0 I � • C 15.1 - 25,0 D 25.1 - 40.0 E' 40.1 w'60.0 F ?60.0: , • • • • • • • tr lI I I I I r � f , ' I it I I ln' , ' r ti 1 1.1 • '.7, i ,i ..u;..,c „a,«ua.T4r�•IIM dt.,. M,..e.w-a»iu;«�.-.-,...,..t0.:.':t.:J.,A..w.4..;'M w, .,..::,`.,+•Y..,1.,t,i.4+.,.w,L.,:a..J:u.it.,.c,...,l uk:.,af.A.,:,.tsi_.IA1..a..aw';wb�a.wa'sf'n,' Mh.,. ,t.i.. , .. J...Ava..ri._;L...t..4x..«..G.: ..i-r.vl�♦..UYM44,5.1,u,.. .t.,•«, {"SIGNAL OPERATIONS ANALYSIS PACKAGES PAGE - 3 • DESIGN AND EVALUATION SUMMARY CONTROLLER SEQUENCE LOST TINE SPECIFIED INTERSECTION NAME RUN NO. AND TITLE TYPE DIAL N/S E/111 PHASES /PH TOTAL SAT. LEVEL PACIFIC HWY & 69TH 1: 7/86 8 PH PRELIM TIMING ACTUATED N/A T 17T 4 3.5 10.5 95.0 MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS • SEQUENCE • DELAY STOPS EXC FUEL EXC LIEFT MAXIMUM V/C LEFT TURN TREATMENT MOVEMENTS: (VEH-HRS) (%) (GAL) (VEH1 QUEUE RATIO PROTECTION VEH/CYC PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 • � ... �, �.«_ ... Y.5 .. n.w«_wr«lwrrr_wr____.wn5 .... .0«. ND THRU : .51 98.9 .58 .7 .60 XXXX • LEFT t 2.15 99.5 2.03 .0 • 2.1 .91 NONE 2.0 XXXX its„ • SD THRU : .78 99.3 .81 .9 .75 XXXX •, LEFT : 3.53 100.0 3.00 .0' 2.4 1.00 NONE 2.0 I XXXX ED THRU : 1w52 34.2 6.23 14.8 .581 ?7?71 XXXX • LEFT : 1.07 98.8 1.15 .0 1.4 .75 REST .0 XXXX 7??? • , . I • 11S THRU . 2.93 47.0 11.24 26.3 �? . 6.3 .75 ?? ... XXXX . 5r LEFT 1,05 98.8 1.13 .0 1.4 .75 REST .0 XXXX ???? ,. • MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS SIGNAL TIHINf S: IMAXIMU{M V/C ALL RED DIAL CYCLE PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 A��ALYSI�. ' DELAY STOPS EX. FUEL EK. LEFT PERIOD EH-HRS) (X) (GAL) (VEN) QUEUE RATIO : (V -(SEC) 1 NO. (SEC) • (I) (%) (X1 (I) (%) (X) • 5 t L 80O 13.55 46.3 26.16 .0 N•26.3 1,00 .0 N/A 10 ;OY 6.3 8.2 .1 `8 17aa 5.5 SUhMgRY 13.55 46.3 26.16 0 2 6.3 1.00 TIMING BASED ON EQUAL DEGREE OF SAT TURATIO N • .. • • I • •• ,r,..wc:........,.u......tw,-.uzr.c„.xau i v ,r. ., , . ,,,,,, cr:_ j- LA.YNL r p 7 M CAS /ELL . . SURVEYOR, INC REGISTER5b LAND SURVEYOIR Oregon — Washington -- Idaho 6120 S.W. Lombard Avenue ■ Beaverton, Oregon 97005 il Telephone 503 /644-3179 r 'It�II r I ,.,,','7 u l- December 1 , 1983 E p l'"r k i , .' REF: Wayside Inn ' Job No: 3306 ' CITY OF T1G'AR PLANNING DEPt City of Tigard Planning Dept. . 12755 S.W. Ash Tigard, OR 97223 Attention: Steve S korhey , ` I ti Steve: . Last month I talked i th you over the phone requesting a 'letter . 4 from the City stating that they approved the idea of removal of the . island and allowing left turns into and out of the Wayside Inn via'the • driveway at the northwest corner of said tract. We have not received this letter yet (which I think you said would come from Frank's desk) , Would you check with Frank and see i f there is anything Iwe can do to expedite things a little, I �I Thank you for your help, . Respectful I y, a , Albert Hertel i AH:km , Z I . I I SoUNbARY SUPVSYS 0 SUSbIVIsloNs ii ToPOOAAPHlC MA)PING 1 C NST{ IJGTION STAk E-Otit l i 1 u , „._/�a.I.i� -,...... i._1 ,.W,-I.,A.,.L.:k-..,•a•,.1.J.-n,=t1�\,.,.r4.:4.e217+»414::,,u.mh,4��h...u„.a ,,,ti.utm.W,xw✓rf r��S,.d.y r ,E? t I�V tr,4,,t t,aw.au w,� 2.•. i' r: .�'• ^ a a...,' t, � i w�f r r 1 t l�wk+.tlLi: = :.•,,:• Oregon on State High wa Division DISTRICT 2A MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR t vW oR AT{YEH j P.O. BOX 565, BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075-0565 PHONE 229-5002 GOVERNOR October 26 1983 M pepily Refer to a Rile ya.. City of Tigard Planning Department • 12420 S.W. Main • P.O. Box 23397 Tigard„ :OR 97223 , Attn: Steve Skorney I R E: Wayside Inn n Access • Hwy. West Pacific y W w In 1977, the Highway Division issued a road approa,:h permit ' for the subject access, This was to function as a secondary access to the motel . For that reason the City anr:t the State required that the approach be constructed to allow right turn in n and right turn out movements only.. . I The approach was constructed according to these requirements and appropriate regulatory signs were installed. The Highway Division, would not allow this approach to al- low to be modified t l- low left turn movements either ,into or out of the site. '''''i I Sincerely, • C.T. Mink Asst. Dist. Matr.,t. Supervisor CTF:1 e I • L I , III , 1, Corm 789-1110 it 0), u N) Y , WAy W. LEE �� r,-„ti w. ;, 1.1x! r1 E r''t\j jv� C�N�rw! CONTRAC�Or�, INC. �;: ;ç) jj }r,,. ;. 5210 S.E.2,61.1+AVENUE • POR11.AND,OREGON 97202 ",,. • . r( -�' i 503 234.0591 t ' '; 1 I t , . ,,� � October 7, 1983 ► � .�., •,.. r r- v E'Y Q , . . • i r Mr. Bill Monahan Director of Planning 0 o and Development • 0 , p � r},�� ��l��1' City of Tigard 1 4 !ki r, A`' ,, 12755 S. W. Fifth Avenue 1i i ''',e,'4 Tigard, OR 97223 . Dear Bill, a t . In our meetings of the last couple weeks, we have discussed the '`'1 to make some alterations in the�� ��� •� ever increasing need � secon:dary ` v'er 7.nC'r'C'. p N access from the "Wayside Inn” onto Pacific Highway near my north- '', . (,'Iie u �� east corner property. Over the past years lterally hundreds of f my guests who have reservations have complained how hard it is. to our motel. �r r erva We have had. numerous calls from ►` y peoplehat nearba nphone booths callin to sa y P P Y phone calling say, "I can see your motel.. 3 but I can't find my way ins" We estimate that we are losing 20 1t? ` 30% of our potential business because 'of poor access. These guests . a• are not only spending s endin taxable dollars here but throughout town!at ' . .,e.,,<'. our restaurants, service stations and retail stores. -, 1 A good portion of this problem is caused by the restricted flow of / traffic to and from our easterly driveway access road. Our. guests / , are not allowed to exit to the west or enter from the east. 4. ti This restriction was required, by the Oregon Department of Trans, portation, ,, , was f on in 1977 At that time Pacific Highway p differently and P a Hag wa., striped p y nd the center turn lane did not exist. • No such restrictions have been placed on the other businesses in the area, many of which have far greater vehicular traffic count. The Mobil service station immediately to ou r east, for instance,has two unrestricted entrance/exits within 140 feet of each other o � and has fat more vehicular trips than our motel . ; • will still Our main entrance/exit entrance/exit be on S. W. 59th Avenue with , p g to promote the use of that route; signing around the axlta.n lot •' however, that does not preclude the fact that many of our guests still do not understand how to "get there from ;here and most ' important of all this does not address our primary problem of how to get our guests into our motel. p i fn , , w MI r A ' Mr. Bill Mon!'tin T October i ; Page 2 A local improvement district is presently forming and. is studying' • ways to improve S. W. 69th Avenue. When 69th is complete, we will have less traffic using our secondary driveway. Our guests will be able to use S. W. 69th to gain access to 1-5 rather than using Pacific Highway. ' In order to accomplish our goal, we are proposing that we remove the traffic island at the northerly end of our driveway to restripe the center line and crosswalk to allow entrances and exits in both directions. We are seeking your approval to this design so that we might apply for a minor modification of our design'reniew application. w � . Respectfu_ily, Way (Lee . WWL»l1 enclosures: Preliminary Modificat on Map cc: Mayor Wilbur Bishop • • I , e � r • .. I a.. r , . • , II _.. ., , . 4.7,)&'1111.-d 661/ a)/7/ h- ii,:(.--(c,zd,40' ii , , , - , ,,,-,,,,,c, ,x, '). . . 7. • . 7'. „„dal- .. ' . , , ' , 6,s-3- ,)/;2B ' , _,(,,,, a .7 ,,,...,, le ,,.4;4:0 4,(,,,,,,e f " '"c ; 6--0,,ced.,,7, , , ..,,,,,, ,/,,,,,,,,,,4,4-e,,,,. H 1.. ,,,,/.2,/,(e--, . . , , .,„2....;' ' r e„,„ , , fr _ , 7,-„e) , „, . , ,,,,,,, , ,..., ,,,-,..4, .. , , . , , . , : , ,/,4 4,,., , . /14. i; ' e'a,e(2. /. 7 t)w,-i.e. ' , , 4/#7,-t2,,ke.-, , , Lie-- , L I', > y 4 / e, •-,- .,,e,t,e.,/,-61 /02,ze-te.e.,,,v ///..- F I V / / %d/ 7 : y .), Z /4"),7 l' ' . , ' ',,,,,h 4;2,-‘,,e,,te .-e ,A „-e,;‘,"`t&,'7 .,,,,tiaj'e., ee.. 1 e•'•(? 1 . '. ' '' ' '' ' ' ' ''' ' 6°/1 / 671' r ' , f 5 e.)4, 6 ' ' d;,6? p,:// ' '. ,,, , , , , , 1 e ,),,,,,1 , ,e4, 4,,, , . nestah- ,e:e , , . • . ;rte f e.i� � . . /'('''' /,'/'ell'/Le'‘/ '-i'l'') ') P'''Z. ' .."6-6), 1 , ' ' ' . ' - --1-'.4:e ,,,,,,,,' ez 7 alet'',, , , (,,,,,e4, , ,,,,,,,ed,,,,,, il:e.e.,,,,I,' 6.7 ,4, 0,6/ ,,,16„,..4,,,',,,, ,.(., I w.. I i ■ , • 'A• ,. , '• +...�....wq..u..,y...r aw..oau.o-m+ury.:,+�, ........;1 .,w....... ..... .. .•�, 1, a, w ., ., ,.a ,.. 1 h , • r • , :..x.. ..v .rr n,,. ,,rr.4a,:r - ...r it ..:.::....._..,.... ..Il.. . ...r � ...�/�M1.�l.. ..,i- .R.. r...Gr-.... rA4. • MA,:o 14,4, 1979 • r e * 5210 26th 7 gas SM 38-16 tAio. do iei w r` •6!) `'af,0'0 3,t$ , 'u r • ,$42 3, ' ' t)z" • . i * •• I4,v ',7Cf.' th4,1 ,pp yy �µ+y��wW{ 'yj4�/,�J ..LL �y1 yryi�'yp�;' yy Y��,y Y'VWt IY�J.i 1/11A rW. M'Y Ai•T Mr'I f^Jt/9+H M1 4 /l. �,�g �p{ ry�v ,y fir, ,fig w �y �� y,�, ' "81t Y aMnt'la"�wu �r N4 i,N2y i iw Yt A4� � .9Y and`,ai i �u,t, o z•, 1 y ° 77,1$' 1, • , eT is ' a.....r ,:,,,r.w. ..,.—r. ..�,,: .i ., .,,,...., v.,....�:...� "..;..l... .i.,r: •.,....,.� .«..r ..,.,.., „ r. .._r� s...,, r ..,.w..�ra. >,., ... u. r • • i . it Wok a 0 ZtA 2414ti, . " '4).itilltAltilo 4m,„400/40, 0202 0,isw,Tot ,toot ' . ' �n14` ',i 1.. + ` tIte vftIitaida 'fie 1L' , !tt ' k' 01'1 " off aotopitit zo r'1 . , a 't %am ti.14 1,4000141#4$4,4 bO► 41,0, a 41‘0!u• 4 $1,11. N 4y D000t,h,r 1010 r r yy . 4 4, get, :fin ho,t,44 $t$4 vittottio y Yty y II w 1y4 y�4d ! Wia „ r 7 t. • II y r • + L 'Telephone 234.0591 WAY W. LE General G'osatractor,Inc, 5210 S. E. 20th AVENUE R 1V PORTLAND. OREGON 07`202 E.(N 1 November 30, 1978 t Mr. Peter Greene City of Tigard 12420 S.W main Tigard, Oregon 97225 •I Dear Mr. Greene: In accordance with our telephone conversation this afternoon, I am enclosing a photocopy of the cancelled check for the funds placed in trust for the finish of the landscaping at Planikhouse. This was given to the City in lieu of an insurance `bond and was to be fully i g City refundable upon satisfactory completion. Also enclosed is a copy of the bond United Pacific Ins. Co. placed • with the Department of Transportation for. ` the landscaping at Wayside Motor Inn. Neither of these bonds have been r�.leased'yet. We are anxious to have written notification on the insurance bond release to forward : ' to our insurer and avoid paying any additional pr;emiuras. The cash bond should be returned directly to Way.W. Lee, General Contractor, Inc. for t .'i, btainin. the release of these two bonds. 1 Thanks Lor your help.in obtaining I 3 Sincer ]y F 1 oris Anderson Secretary to way W Lee : • ,- a I n , dim 13ncsY 1 R �1 a . M . , un it'' 24 1077. �, Crown tun `' ., ; ,SW i0'quth Rent Sherwood', proejon ?7140 RE: SwI0m109. P001 Plan goviow Wayside Irony q t� 6) 'SW c� hwaY Your Plans to construct 0 20f x 40i x.et dopp swimthinq pool l n tote pro as d W side inn to bay l c t at $l 4 () Paoi f c, Htghway In TI ar o art§ approvod With th , ' , n followino conditlonsl . , 1) 'h , water honer must 't wwc th 00 rw*pit ov rlo s(d eaf fy d vk sS.w 2) `►"ho ►aline, must be I nIta l h d t two f t the sh H o ' braakoff. Po: rro ,cited Strip must be lo+ a ad t t M broakeff pole' 4) A foot showor mutt be loc t d at the molt froquenttiv,, used gate. ' 5) The 00-01 1 r st b4 onelotad •y four foot non:',-dilmbabio ponce with s:if-closing and self-1 t nIn ati» When the work is n +ar ln" r~O tion* wa wi q neod, t6,, bo advIsed so an 1001;oo' io , dan bo sohedt I d 'n. If YOU h0V6' V6 an questions in' regards t* th . aboVo, please. contact William' i $ am at d »34.' . ,d Very truly yours WAS H I C T ON COUNTY OCPARTOtMT t PUBLIC H*AL" or~ry A, Ko p., c l al.ttdp, U10 ith rv1' t " +►aol ra g4,Adbor0.0 P.S.•y 3op6ti,01%or n I r imsn i ° n ifh Oiti ' 5enl+ tton D • MF we u t oo r� 5+ate i4 �ei th` • i slob city `�`� r* •Herr, Wtit W ''• ' MMr" 0014' Hall'''"' • ;,..N. Y ' .. ' ) . , , \ . . '.<...—.....,:....,'.:.,..... ::..:..... ..;.a, «.w.. ..,..........,......,: _.. ..:«.M,.«.,.-..,:.-...,, ...,.....:...�......,...,_.,..,_...,.-.._..-, .,._ .0..,..'.. _.,,.-,,.-..n,-..........:....v,v.....,:.:... .....r.a.....f4„ „„a,...I,;M._.J.w.a r,:„ -.... ...,. .,5.r;L d.f„ ,,..,aw« .::,.+..-,,...,u,r{: • • • '.--------' ----- 1 i f: '---�e .Pate of Oregon Road A DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION APPLICATION Approach i�' rmit :Nn, . S TATiC.1N AND PERMIT TO ig y Division CONSTRUCT ROAD APPROACH 23534 Wo hwa ' ,m 81.734-330? Name and Address of Applicant Applicant hereby applies to the Administrator and i.. . — State Highway Engineer for permission to construct • ' . �e a sc c. `l G octal Contractors i y ors znc.' �. �oi.tt•,tic r,l i .t.:)',' LO L;.A . 26th Ave. an approach road connection to the y ' i'crtaand, Of? 97202 • side' of the 1'c..ca.f is Iitr,y ti1(.-y;t .l ! ..Ei..7hi11gt on IIighwa No• County, ' 2•3L1,_rj5•r at Mile Yost rj"71 _, Highway Engineers 1 a Station . + ; .4 . as described herein: Special Provisions V--) Map Reference L1 ,c.t, 1 1. Current Rules a n dk Regulations r o ns g o ve rni g Road i pr Permits adopted by State e f Oregon, De p Depart-meat of Transportation, Highway hwa Division, b. this reference made a part of this 1,i er mit, C opies of said ' Rules and Regulations may be obtained from the District Engineer. 2. hereto The approach(es) and b (this shall a constructed in accordance with the Type___...5._______Road Approach Sketch attached y c made a part hereof. • 3: The following additional drawing s are attached _./: _gEn ineertn. sheet 1 of 1 proret //76-351 � _._ hereof . n bn shed he�cct p^ . g : �_ tip , hereto by this reference made a part he .�..., ._ �.���.w.-- C Facility served by approach(es) .:..� r- �';li'_l '� ✓ , 5. Construction of the approach(es) shall commence on or after t-T1?. _........,�.-.,w__,,1927 , and will be comma pleted on or before __ 17e_cernbe;r 1927 , ' 6, Applicant or his contractoi' shall notify the District Engineer at L1 '. 76'11',l lc' 17'O !;d. hone' _ t_. t)7221,_ _.—, phone 2 , ytJ� prior to commencing work and after completing construction of the approa h(es) covered by this permit. ,. r , . , R............"/, j ' , r k I t �2 € ),.) 1 ).Recommended for apro ai. J. w` ; ,. Liistrict Engineer Rctiotial Engine' • Applicant declares he is the owner or lessee of the real property ilbttti,irig the Eohove described highway trrftl ..„ has the lawful authority to apply for this permit, This pert-nit is issued subject to the terms and provisions con- ` ,. tairiod herein and attached hereto; this permit is accepted arid approved by the tipplicttttt subject to said tarnrts - titirl provisi()nys 1 l)1.)i i 6'l t t t 'u6'J r�r»,,, ��.x1 . t,.r-�l:.. r C 17W,i..t,..� »C or,..r -T �c O W M Il i.:g 1.Y &AIO R A p D I STATE: ” /13y w;n.. ey 4. '' ,, , ,. ,,,p,e,6',,z e:e.c l .Date of Application . .� .. 7'fective Date ,_ : , , tip 1 ,lw . . , . , . • ,N-W«"s: iR uM. -+)M.fn..1Au.J 4.11..A.LLu«A f*rrr.l.+.a. 4pu.Mi.'•-i.%.Y- r • The approach covered by this permit shall • be) constructed in laccordan•ce ''with th,. ' 1 -P 1 following d:imenaions and specifications. 1 Ow/w /.1.0, 1 0 ■ f 3 Exrg, curb 1 Dc.:.- °' _DR/w= 15 _ _Curb Type ( I. . Stone Base Size a Type--11,e''' - ° re Comp. Thkn.L_ :L0 , inches Hwy. , Stone Levelling: Size a Type_:;14 r Course ►! __ PLAN Cpmp. T kn. � w__ __ _ln h e • •i A.C. Pvmt. : Class_ _ C _ r . S Corn hk r� n. 4 _J ches • 2 separate 211 lifts • . tti; As ph, Cortc' Pvfit, Curb 0 . , SLO,02/ft, • Stone ease a Levelling Course,/ APPROACH TYPICAL SECTIO 'C . Hwy. Driveway C._ Alhmoterial and Workman ship shall be in accordance With the current State 61 i ,,.„„ G-G) . 12 mar, Standard Specltiahon For Hiclhway'Gonstruction . DIVISON OREGON STATE HIGHWAY D U S 0 N Gutter G Line PROFILE TY 'E5ROADAPPROAG CURBED HIGHWAY APPLICANT.... Ii)o,y ,Tare Gene.rx:t1, (-,,t) tt')i-totllr' ' NOTE' --,1— If driveway grade NG"is a minus grade a short HWY. &' c±f± Fiwwy ;';c�5• vertical roll should be constructed outside gutter , —���i- • Ilse SO as to corwtlnedroInage In the gutter past SIDE OF HWY) gc�titla(lx` -y _ _ the dr lveway) 1 'I' ' • 1 M C L� P O S � 1-1 t- S T A .�� ^% '.4—y irl r ROAD APr'R(�ACH=1 PERMIT NO. `3°`]3i i►0 F1 Kit A 1-'73 d�'�l b7 R ........... ..._).....,.,...J......__.,..... . r . r ` ,, 4 ■ • . ' ,:I.W4.n d .»-ra-.,a'...... s.fix,i+w. u.,wa>4•.�..iu..ut::.k-.,,, ...eu.l.•vt. ,.w...l+.'n,,.• , ..a:u4e.-+..,r.`as.,(4u k-a.a...r -a a .i: ! n«.w+:si:»r' +awlwn:4it,r . _,r.`x .�,Jw r _ j4 • 1 Gas Pumps or Similar Drive •--__._.w .-M-- I n Service Ea c i l i t y — • R/W Line ( 10' Min.' , / ,.....-.......... D r ________...._,i.j i ` . Curb of h1d island Area___.___..... F Edge S rr� , 4. 101 When no extg, curb '- I � Edge of Traveled Way � i ``� GENERAL NOTES: F1 + . Width (W)...........)._......._............�- ` 1, Distance between approaches at R/W Line �qc A Angle of Slew (A)._-___..`__.__ '' . shall be sufficient to allow patrons to be ` served without stopping in or man- Distance between A ppr Di)= , properly I IP P 9 euvering vehicles on Highway R/W. 2, area with curbing All other dimensions and construction and /or-or landsca in with growing shrubs • Enclosure of island a details shall be as shown on attached . landscaping g g s T pe,,.....2,__Fiodd Approach is allowed if so specified in permit, p 3. If the island area is not curbed it shall be , • treated as necessary to prevent use by ,, ( vehicles, This may be accomplished by • a ' ditches, special grading, fencing) guard rail, site posts or the like IIn a maner that does , . ` not impair adequate .si sight distanc9, P g 9 4. Curbed approaches moy be required on , • uncurbed se ctions of highway in developed w � or developing urban type areas, When, so 1 required construction of curbing along •�` ` frontage pavement between existing pave" NOTE` shall be ir.occo ! meat and Curb and necessary rainage Oregon Sta ddr/drSpecitiatlon Far HighwayoCo Construction State of f y facilities by the permittee will be a OREGON STATE HIGHWAY DIVISON condition of the permit, DUAL APPROACH 1 a S , t -r t r A P P L I G A N 1 ,t � Iie"t: Geria 'a1 Lc,t� 1 ct° s {I l , w J1a17.0 111,vr G, ,C'.,ta t,7 , -I , SIDE OF HWY...sc1'lal;}zEU I....—__ _ MILE POST..T� —"_ _ENGRS STA.__ —- It i • I I i .• ROAD APPROACH PERMIT NO,—__,— ., 7 11 3 G l�'O - 01 '3 0 k } , • 11 • , `1 • • • r �' T''•-.r-.., iii \ ! r .. .�: ."'� ° 1r • \\ • . I f.. ,- 4 r -r/' Cr-� r '" c- �.Y�.. e �/"�r� i'�, \\ �C�•°I QGa ` _ f, /'+ a te',° c w-. d , Y . .a' ,''• .-ti.4 r T e•-•-, s.-T ..,r"w1JF�t C` ^`�-.[ f�'r `, y ' ` 'i ." ;, .. `: 4 T' ` �, ' + M/..., .rr<:.'-'.. ':7. .11..,'4..,.sr.r.` ` '4 t' ✓( 1 r '' ' ► I, J . ��■ ,� a `�. • • • • , I • , r 1. rIP , . r ,a, ' P . • . • • . ,, �•M 11 A c, , • \ \ ' ', ' . , , r r 1 ` , 1 i rr s. 9 •11r I { , I , , I • 1 I' ' ,w. .,. � 11,E II " l- , 4. I 4 1 1 s / A • I • ;ICI 1'{, • •111 • 4,11 r n.. 1 �( (0 H r i µr4 16*10z1)01 t Cil Y OF TIGARD cf. 0,, ±.uy{.M.'' '7✓yr, :: .. �wr� r . P.C . E3o)t 23397 12420 S.W. Maim Tigard, Oregon 97223 . , u A st 10, 1977 f Mr. Way Lee ' n. 5210 S.E. 26th Avenue Portland, Oregon Dear Mr. Lee: In response to a request by Tom McDonald, I am once again pro- viding a status list of outstanding items that require resolution in regard to your development. 1. Installation of unfinished sidewalk section on 69th Streets 2. Installation of three street lights as per your plan prepared by P.G.E. r 3. Completion of driveway off end of 69th Street to connect into the existing parking. I . • 4. Completion of driveway connecting to Pacific Highway. 5. Submission of an approvable signing and pavement striping plan;, r 6. Amending (as per you r request) the landscape plan. ` . 7. Submittal�" tal lof one iaaylar as-build drawing ran. all public improvements. • S Installation of a 1" Class "C:r asphaltic concrete overlay on 69th Street. � • i It You have been granted a temporary occupancy permit for the • 1 r a �! � . outstanding` satisfactory resolution of outstanding • deficiencies. No further occupancy will be allowed until , • s. to stisfa s 1-6 inclusive vE" have been. completed.'i tee ,. �, _ leted� p Items 7 and 8 can be y necessary completed as rap�.d�i.Y as desired but are not imBtedio.tel.. cssax°y to attaining occupancy a$ these items normally follow accep tancp ' ' action..by the. C`ity, Loth items .must be complied with before the �. City will release Your Performance/maintenance bond • f II , illhrf t ;4 ' 4t +„5,4'..,v.C�.,.:,aU'q.:,..:Aduut,.,...;::u.,;:,...u...wwaa;:•.taw«.7,,.,.rl�.,.,...-.,.a,.-:...+.1,w.»k...:4w,.,.u..,....=il;a..-ra.i,,,..,w.t:a •.w r Page 2 °. ViTaY Lee August 10, 1977 Additionally, for the record, you have temporarily satisfied the requirement for 69th Street extensiorl construction by virtue of an agreement entered into betweet yourself and the City to con- . the stre et a t a future date upon notice from the City to do so. . , Also, a landscape bond has been Posted to assure in.staltation. of • required landscaping which temporarily allows for occupancy. 4. This landscaping work must be completed prior to the final ac- p ceptance and release,of any bonds. Therefore, you should make arrangements to attain approval of your already submitted plan and then to e edit.iousl cause the lasti to occur. It is p y p ms's - understaxding that you have stated a desire to wend' the land - p plan has been submitted and staff is amenable to sca o Ia.n. `�ha t h changes. Mr. McDonald has J.ndicated that the site plan, upon, ,, which proposed landscaping is shown, should be considered as your official site plan and we are proceeding on that basis as it satisfactorily sweets conditions imposed by the Design Review ,4 Board , Expeditious us handing of items 1-6 wall allow an early occupancy E� �d�.tio permit for the remainder of your building. Please allow us to assist you by attending to these unresolved matters. Very truly yours, 1' Bruce, P. Clark City Administrator , cc: Engineering tti Building g ' .arin g Tom McDonald BPC/Pr • ti t t { • • • • 1301'4 BOND NQ U 98 68 55 •' CON,C ACTOR, INC. , MOW ALL MEN 13Y t,i:'...3E1 �:`RL:f.°;1dTlTEi, rt'l)at We r 1r1, t}c-;►; �►,t il./corporat ,on, whose adcir,css is 52 Cl ;,i.. 6t;h, rort1r:nd, Oregon ,1s 1,1 tic i,1.aal, and the INSURANCE t�t)�1Vylt"J'. � amF dry 1jcensed to (10 lIN[fl,la iAGI'lw�(, busino.ss in the Stage of Orrf.?.cjon, as S'uxrety, are ile3,ca firmly bcrund unto the ()1partmt21nt of Transportation, Highway Division, in the sum of $ 'l:'CJQ THOUSA:NIJ ($2 Opp) . ic)r. w} 'lrrhpcayinc•int., wc3.1. anti t:l:uly to bci niF)dr:, wn t 'i vc.s, (-)11 .. heirs, executors,, • aillnilnist:rettorr4, sucoessCJrs and { Ess.1.gri , joint)y at`tci st vtH'I:`.a1l‘,", firmly by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THIS O3LIGATION IS sucif THAT WU( REAS the Principal is under • V t'rrlr,�.k, or is t.rex"formx.tltf work for. , v:ho i)earmi,t, from t: Dt I_>drtrite_+►1 Tranr:;1>r.)t•1 01 ," Division, to do Iactrl�l ;G4t 7 c� k Writ;��i.cic� !nll upon the Hi(7,1.13e*/3' 1ct. } 4 wt'Cit/4tt'/I r�'.tl: ` a.aa.:w M+n. -w 4..w.arrnrr u—.�...,.. ..r.r��.r..•:+.�. .+..swvrr,.-,.e NOW, THV,REFORN, if t'.hQ lroi vi.rl ! h i l l r,,r;L4+rr► E��`i icl seate Highway to 7. T . '� ,` "`' " '�t'.rh"t t:LC)tt � ill 11w�,a}' tJl+v�.C�ioTl, c'',S lit +fit �,c to t: r1.� +.. La,�. �at��tttc.t� c� � i pe xrnit, unc,ir.�. which the wax),t hr, icr f carmr.'(•l then this d....)l.igation .yr. t, tri:1,,ry vr,'Lci other ,>Tsrs,. it. n fra.l. f:r,r•(r,' rlf't.`F: "t, , 4r, XN WITNC�;S WN";f�i�,cfl r Lh'r t,�ti.a lrritic•Lp; 1 irrt:; tr+`► t 1,11 k',r� sot, his hand and s al, ;;Itti t tt+' SiirC'L), has eaust''t,t t.'slot'11,s to lay ].t„«i duly :ttati'►ari ze o f;.icers 1f,ri .i tt; L'Jtp rlt te seal t.c 1)o 1tor to ra.i Lixe+-i thI ';s h day of , I - jlli v lr 7 . �..,--�"Y,.,�" "rte `�k ...,, � J/'��' ✓ ` - rrat. .. . '''"I`._»: a � � .._ 1Y A ur•xa I•4 ? ,,....,. -,,..:++..,; ��,ur ...._.....,.._..�,,.--,. r ritrt r)" 'a '1 r : L AGREEMENT • By this document th e City Tigard, hereafter the City, and Way W. Lee, General Contractor, Inc. , hereafter Owner, create ',; a written record of their agreement regarding the commitment t A . I of Owner to construct a certain roadway and the acquiescence of the City in the delay of the Owner' s construction of that roadway. The terms and conditions' of this agreement are as follows : 1. 1 1. Owner acknowledges that the City has required, as e to build a . . the permission granted to the Owner of , e a condition �, P g motel upon the property described in Exhibit "A" to this agreement ;that Owner improve S. W. 69th Avenue to the easterly boundary of Way W. Lee Subdivision, a duly recorded plat in the City of Tigard. That point, the easterly boundary, is 240 feet more or less beyond the point to which S . W. 69th Avenue would mor o� p need to be improved in order to provide access to the motel presently being constructed by Owner . ,a 2 Owner wishes to delay the construction Of, that e ,, portion of the improvement be tween the e easterly boundar� of , Way W. Lee Subdivision and the point to which it is necessary to develop the street for the purpose of serving the motel. Owner agrees to improve or pay for the improvement of S. W. 69th ' Avenue to the easterly boundary of Way W. Lee Subdivision, and Owner further agrees that the City may determine when that Page one - Agreement I ..l.n. aa,. ... .,.,..off.. _«.:J:.. ..» 4,.. u, ,.. ... »,t...l.ri_utr::11 l.aw fir....•.tar.x,. .....1«.,.wJ•. ...,fn..,�.,r„,,...N•: .•..,�..!r,.,a .....ax • improvement shall be made. City g• notice directing • 3 . The Cit shall ive Owner' written 69th ' Avenue eastward . Owner to complete the improvement-of S. W to the easterly boundary of Way W. Lee Subdivision. The City ' 4 may give such notice at anytime. Owner shat?. Zinety (90) days from the date the notice sent to com let ie �nstruct on . of the improvement. 4. In the event Owner shall fail to complete the Y • construction of the improvement t of S. W. 69th Avenue Ito, the • �, easterlY easterly boundary of Way W, Le e Subdivisi on within, ninety (90) .days after the City issues written notice, the City shall have the right to make' the improvement and the cost of mprovement shall become, a lien upon the property described in Exhibit "A” ° ' lien arising pursuant to the provisions of this agreement shall l r 'street assessment' ,liens. are reef apses } be enforced in the manner ache,:, enforce, under the Tigard � 'curd �tuniCi a1 Cade and the Cb.arter, of the City of Tigard • 5. The obligations created by this agreement shall be t bindin g upon he Owner, and upon i is heirs, succ es sors, and assn`g ns , , .• he oblYation shall run with the land and t�e Owner . no t •have the right' to transfer the land free of this obligation. ,j at some lar time the Cit Y should determine °• that an easterly extension of the improvement of S W4 699th Avenge • b e y o nd tha 'Point n t to wh�ch is necessary to develop in order to Page Two greetnent :o«...,..._m ...,;:..,«. ., .-,.I....u.. .,..._._.-....-....a._u..;::.... ....:.. .,..i,..ua.....F a+/ n+•.««.a,....wY....iJ..,..,...-. ...,,.:,.., .,....... ..•L..1_4w....4• .......44,.,.::w . «.....«... e d t , o . • • serve the motel would not be of any substantial a - .�e benefit to City and inhabitants, then City may the City or its residents � en the Cit m.a I relieve the Owner and the land of this obligation by a release in writing, but no other act, other than the improvement of i-he road as described above shall fulfill the obligation ' ` he obligat-ivn of r i4 the Owner and the land. • � �. ✓ , 1977. �' • • ,'PE O1 ) ss , my of Iuitnomah t . --.y-----_ Qn this 3rd day of M'a : y' • sore me i'aP ■earea -------, way W. L,ee axed . I -_ Priscilla D Lee ti e t e ng duly t'rr�rn, d e the — both to me, personally 'residen r and he. sair ' said GJav W r pa ' whe Secretary tt 1sei.l,�d. • '�Jithin named Care oxaE�- '" of WA�r---W.�.:�EE,, corporate seal of sa�dUr'ororstion tl seal affl..x d �-a d s...��e— ns ed to � that the said instr�umer� was behalf of said Cor orationbythori c tors , and t y o f e p to sealed in bel y its T� W .Y Lee�,,,.� Board r d o f owledg d sa c iri trtme17t to }ae t17e free act and and tir�.sci • � deed cif sax d M Car' �= � para lbn xx� TESTYI��ON WHER oF' T' have hereunto sot mY ' hand and affixed my official seal the da �-�- and year 'la:st' above written y • l Y.oat a r l f ,r or Oregon. ' • CommIs.lon eX, iX • n G . \ ., , 1 AGREEMENT By this document the City of ,Tigard, hereafter the City, and Way W. Lee, General Contractor, Inc. r hereafter Owner, create a written record of their agreement regarding the commitment ' ' of Owner to construct a certain roadway and the acquiescence of the City in the delay of the Owner' s construction of that roadwa conditions of this agreement are. as y 4 The terms and cond ita.on g follows: 1. Owner acknowledges that the City has required, as a condition of the permission granted to the Owner to build a i motel upon the property described in Exhibit "A" to this agreement that Owner improve S. W. 69th, Avenue to the easterly boundary of Way W. Lee Subdivision, a duly recorded plat in the City of Tigard. That point, the easterly boundary, is 240 feet / l' more or less beyond the point to which S. W. 69th Avenue would • need to be improved in order to prcvide access to the motel presently b ei n a o Vns constructed by owner . 2, Owner wishes to delay the construction of that portion of the improvement )—c ween the easterly boundary of ' Way W. Lee 5�bdi� ision and �; point Dint to whiCh it is necessary ' to develop the street for the purpose of,'serving the'Motel Owner agrees to improve or pay for the improvement of 5. W. 69th Avenue to the � easterly y of [nley ��. Lee Subdivision, and. casteri boui�dar Owner further agrees that the City may determine when that Page One Agreement 11 s ,, • • '• .r..ti,,..a1.w..r.. ..... ,._,wr,. ..,. ...u,. ..,.s-:d. ,..4..... .s .........,_«.L�»U,:..;:.CAw....4,,,...,;,...+..n.4.,,..,id? ._..._.I;♦y improvement shall be made. • 3. The City shall give Owner written notice directing Owner to complete th p the improvement. of S, W. 69th Avenue eastward e to the easterly boundary of Way W, Lee Subdivision. The City I . may give such notice at any time. Owner shall have ninety (90) ' days from the date the notice is sent to complete construction of the Improvement. o I � 4. In the event Owner shall fail to 'complete the construction of the improvement of S. W. 69th Avenue to the easterly boundary of Way W. Lee Subdivision within ninety (90) days after the City, issues written notice, the City shall have ` , the right to make the improvement` and the cost of improvement shall become a lien upon the property described in Exhibit "A" . A lien arising Pursuant to the provisions of this °agreement shall I I , ' be enforced in the manner other street assessment liens are enforced under the, Tigard the Charter the rd Nlunica.pal Code and of . I City of Tigard • 5. The obligations created by this agreement shall be EI I d f binding upon the Owner, and upon Its heirs, successors and assigns. i The obligation shall run with the land, and the Owner shall not r f have th e right to .transfer the land free of this obligation 6. If at some later time the City should determine l extension f th i provement of S . W. 6 9th Avenue easterly p �' � that an of e m �e.r beyond that point to which it is necessary to develop in order to page Two -- Agreement L ; • I ..._,......_. ... ,:.._.......... .. ........ ....,.... .....;:.a, .;,.::. _....W„ .;:. . _.1::, aU.a..,«.,.,t.:_I,.u...—.,... ..,,:.:;:.i.,.t...,, _ ._ ..a,... _.., _.1:..... ...,t.....,....+e..,^.as is R r serve the motel would not be of any substantial benefit to the City or Its residents and inhabitants,' � the, City may �.;. y a xn bitants then t relieve the Owner and the land of this obligation b release in writing, but no other act, other than the improvement of the road as described above, shall fulfill the obligation of • the Owner and the land , APPROVED by the Council this r day of . , , , 1977. Mayor City of Tigard / . II ATTEST: Ci ter Recorder-C ' of Tigard WAY W. LEEK GENERAL CONTRACTOR, INC 1'. • By By b STATE OF OREGON ) ssi County of Washington On this 25th day of April, 19770 before me appeared Wilbur A. Bishop and Doris Hartig both to me personally known who being duly swortz, did say that he the said Wilbut 'A. Bishop is the Mayor, and she the said Doris Hartig is the Recorder of the CITY 0,? TIGARD, a municipal corporation, and the said mayor and City Recorder acknowledged the said instrument to be the free act and deed of said municipal corporation IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand grid affixed my official seal, this the day and year in this my certificate first written, f Faye ,ixndt, Notary ?ub . c for Oregon Page 3 I I My Commission EXpires I I I I „'f , . 1 UNDERTAKING e' Way W. Lee, General Contractor, Inc. , hereinafter referred to as "Owner,76 Owner of the real property described in Exhibit, "A" attached hereto and by reference , made a part hereof, undertakes to and agrees with the City of Tigard, Oregon, herein- p''> • after referred to as "City," in consideration of said. City's foregoing at the present , d time requiring said Owner to improve 8.w. 69th 'Avenue to the easterly boundary of Way W. Lee subdivision to the City of Tigard as platted, which is 240 feet more or ' less beyond the point to -Which said S.W. 69th Avenue will be improved in order to , provide access to the motel presently being constructed by Owner upon the above- TN : described real property, that at such time in the future when a thoroughfare may be ''' constructed in that vicinity to which the City may want said S.W. 69th Avenue connected, Owner agrees to improve or pay for the improvement of S.W. 69th Avenue to such point that it will approach to such thoroughfare, but in no a.11 connect . -.with the intercepting pp • t event shall Owner' be obligated to improve said S . 69th, Avenue beyond the boundary , of said Way W. Lee subdivision or be obligated to bear any part of the cost of the intercepting approach to said future thoroughfare. This undertaking shall be binding upon the Owner and also upon the above described premises and will b e a con tinuing obligation g ation un it such time as said . improvement of S.W. 69th Avenue has been completed or until its connection with a future thoroughfare has been abandoned. Executed this 15th day of ApTil, 1977. Way W. Lee, G neral Contractor, Inc. Owner STATE OT OREGON ) ss County of Multnomah ) April 15, 1977 Personally appeared Way W. Lee, who being duly sworn, did say' that he is the President of Way W. Lee, General, Contractor, Inc. , a corporation; and that the seal ,' affixed to the foregoing instrument is the corporate seal of said corporation and that said instrument was signed of said corporation by authority of its said rostrum signed and sealed in behalf o bo ar d of directors; and he acknowledged sai d instrument to be his voluntary act an d deed. . Notary purl.i.c for Oregon r My corru a.ssion .ecp res t 4/28/77 1 ' (c) Carl Miller, Mi l l e x u s sanitary seeeice9 expressed concern the anticipated cost of project to the 'tamers would be more than presently being projected. Herb Frank, Frank's Disposal, Service, planned to identify the additional. charge on his billings as MSD charge. (d) Cons study' Session, staff Consensus of Cou�,cil, eras, 'to further consider matter at a S to notify franchise haulers of session. 0 d 9 APPROVAL `OF "UNDERTAKING" SUBMITTED BY WAY W. LEE RELATING TO ExTENS ION OF sow, • 69th STREET . (a) city Administrator synopsized siz"d r equest b y Way Lee � Cit� Attorney reviewed agree-J ment submitted to Council for approval. .- General, discussion by Council; and staff regarding deferring eonst;,ruct,ion of w 69th to later date. F' (b) City Administrator recommended Council°s authorization. for Mayor and Cit Recorder to execute ute agreem er t as presented by City Attorneys (c) Motion by Councilman Cook seconded` ,; y � � ed by Gounci.1.man. Wakem, to authorize execution ,. by City and record document in Washington County deed records Approved by unanimous vote of Coati i1, present, 10,I PUBLIC HEARINGS Commencing at 8s00 P.M. A. APPEAL ,. ZONE CHANGE ., Request'; by Howard L. Glazer for a zone change from Washin g ton County Suburban (SR) to City of Tigard Sing le Family y Residential (R-7) with an overiyie.g Planned Development P.D. to permit six quad houses (four wpi es), at S.W. 121st South of Spring wood Drive. (Washington County Tax Map iii 34B, Tax Lot 500) (1) Public Nearing Opened, (2) Associate Planner stated facts and findings. (3) Public Testimony azerp 2065 NW Flanders read Letter synopsizing Proponents Howard G1, g basis of his appeal. Glazer distributed copies of letter to Cauneil. Opponents . None • (4) Staff recommended approval with the following conditions 1 - Half street improvement be installed to city collector street , standard on S.W. 121�� Street. 2 . Applicant agree to the vacation of S.W. 122nd if and when this is deemed necessary by the City. 3 a That the sidewalk coW7 rµw tion adjacent the street be eight feet I in width (minus the curb width) to accomodate pedestrian and is s a 4 That a berm be placed adjacent S.W. 121st and S,W0 S rin g ood, i r (5) General discussion by Council, and staff regarding Planning Commissio'n's e - action on proposal. Administrator recommended Council have transcript of hearing prepared for further consideration. (6) Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by councilman Wakem that the hearing ' be continued to May 9th - transcripts of Planning Commission hearing to be provided to Council l as soon as possible, Approved by unanimous vote of CrLi,nw.ccil oresente [± P'`CE , 2 GO'LAt _MDETXNG' MIN ` Ds APai 1977 1 0 . ( ...J ,f..ti„ 'io.•+..u)tw,+1.,.�1I.M„u tµ...,.....,- ai., .. • r' � C'�.�_ k .D FEB 2 1977 „,„ c/o '1' CITY OF '1 IGAR 41, D v i I .'•ro..ti > i 1 i 1 C • f P. a Sox 23557 12420 S. W. Main 1 Tigard, Oregori 97223 1 January 27, 1977 . II , {{ �. 12 ,e . Way LP i l a I . I � Gene ral Contractors, Inc, 5210 S .E . 26th Avenue Portland, Oregon 97202 Dear Mr . Lee: ' This is to inform you of four yet to be satisfied condi- tions of the Planning' Commission and Design Review Board . approvals . I . PLANNING COMMISSION , A. "S .W. 69th Avenue be developed on a 60 ' right-of- , way to city commercial street standards . The location for continuance through to the triangle to be approved by the Director of Public Works . " The Public Work 's Directors recommendation is to improve S .W. 69th Avenue throughout the entire dedicated area to assure conformance with the Tigard Triangle Develop- ment Plan. B. "A traffic light to State Hi hwa Division standards g g y i be placed at the intersection of S .W. 69th Avenue and S .W. Pacific Highway, if the Highway Division • warrant study determines that it is necessary ." Please see attached letter from the State Highway District Engineer . II DESIGN REVIEW BOARD A. "Access via the secondary access point onto S .W. i i � the motel complex Pacific Highway be limited to only. n r A number of options are available As I mentioned in , my lette r of December cezber 20 1976 a l ' access Control strip is one option of satisfying the condition. B . "Signing and striping program be developed subject to staff approval regarding directing traffic to S .W. 69t4 Avenue and not onto S.W, Pacif is BighWay via the secondary access drive4 '' xy'y1A; I i I on the s�zbm�.tte�. site plan but Mzxi�.m�.l mention is made. • '::,r•a•A.....-aJ.....vl,. v..a,...1...i. ,.c.»..n-,,...,,...-1«,.:1+,:.• wr L .,t,.'.Y.0 ,.:sw..l.....A..:..-ii A/.. u.k,'et•••A i'.+w.k+. ....i.t+» .I..n : Way Lee January 27, 1977 Page 2 x . it is inadequate to satisfy the condition. Now that the State Highway Division warrant study con • eludes that signalization is indeed necessary at this point the timing of the signal placement becomes crucial so as not to hold up the issuance of occupancy Permits or other final City approvals .rova pp s . Past city practice has been to enter into a three way agreement with the City, developer and the Oregon Transportation Commission. Please contact us as to P your 'course of action. Sincerely, • Richard Daniels Associate Planner. RD: s f Enclosures Director Public Works Building 'officiate • hereb y acknoaicd g e this letter documenting the action of the Tigard Design Review Board and the Tigard Pl anning Commiss ion only, I have received and read this letter and 1 agree to the decision here documented and to abide by any terms and/or conditions attached. • r Date Sigrka •re • • • • r h r ,,4,, r --wr • . i • ;. 1>.:,w.....,. ,.�.......«.... ... ,.;>,.1�..,..—..",e.,..l�..,,. ��..•,. a.�.n..,;r;.._......�v,,.,.i....,r.•:.�.�.u..q:.....ww«♦�....:. ..a..a a",a..l�, I;.,t.H.:.iG;.....0.f,l..,+a�+-a ,t_.,,..:...u..y,•.,.a,w�,w.+....�rtwr�au.�i,.+.,..,,_.;.....;.,,il,l i..:.uv:Y,wrxe.....:+::.+,q...:.w.x...;:,:w...-,..,..,:,uµ..«................. .«., ..�..,..a.�u�..+uw».u..�;(. ' 7 Tate: Janus 1 1 7 > °ri. '� a U ; Subject: Wayside Inn, SDR 38-76 a The following is an excerpt from DRBIs 12/14/76 meting, tape 4, side B, approx. location 55: Staff read proposed conditions 1 'thru 9, condition 5 is l transcribed below, verbatim; 5. Access via the secondary access point onto S.W. i1 ; Pacific Highway be limited to th motel coPPlex only. / '' Motion for approval by Hammes below, v*rbatim: / I'll make a motion that we accept the lv a with adifioations that were stated � whatever you (satf have on that paper - with staff's recommendations. motion seconded by Olson Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote • I ■ II , I I ti ;ii�ulM...iva o.nu r.�. .w,, ., ,�,,•.:,Mi.. i'..�•.. o. �.. � r.�+.�u...re, .,.u. . I u2.. ,.,.. �.. ... .. i i. .� .•..�„ ......v i ,; �.• .F•; ,W"�. 1.:. r I I bt ':i.: ».. ,.,i: ...,.. 'wa..... .0...,. .,/.arlw,++,..k-41'P=.I::u,.....,.w,1.M ,.....x..+!«w M..af.+._,.wl. N:,-+.,...,wpl., ,».a,.....,rt.,..r•.a,.,-.,,.+I.a..t.. r.«x..c,11......+s _ w=r:«�.»:J.W..wFL•,Iw,,.+:w..a..wx ra::,�ly.-..MwM:dr aau.='.ass✓anx,xsw,,.axaawNla> 'rrrt,>rru.,ea'7w��. , 7" • 4" "4 , Ole 1,ry to!Larne au"nership s �,r.lz I7'V7'1r1,'',R.rI�'O UNX'A 1336 Etrsr.�urnSr:rte SCr't��t,�'artretnrl Ot'e�,an 97214 NOR PG14C:EB4NRF,"1, 2'el.,2,34,5()41 January) 17, 1977 City of Tigard Planning Department Tigard, Oregon Re. Wayside Inn Tigard, Oregon Gentlemen: We have had no response to our letter- of November 24, 1976 regarding direct access to the subject motel from Pacific Highway. Our approval of this loan, which involves three participating permanent lenders, was predicated on the property having said access. The original plan, submitted to your office long ago, reflected such access and, if objectionable, could have been rejected long before our loan commitment was i ssued. I .. We consider suc h access to be a prime requisite for the successful aperatinh of the motel . We have considered the 69th Avenue access to be a temporary one and if we had ever had any doubt that the principal access a1 to the motel would not be from Pacific Highway We would not have considered ,r I y grant i hg, the loan. We should appreciate your assurance that the latter access will be avail u,Y able to this well planned development. i. Sincerely yours, SECURITIES- INTIrRMOUNTAIN, INC. f r Warren L. Kirby U ice President t WLI � rm Hr ,4D OFF'I t a r 1 i�,�cl 0r� nn 1Y . 1 1CL ,,c Seattle, �l�dt�e, tis attrglu r S rIn foist,Skirt 1), r c�Gtitl f r)r3r, a ¢ ,h • g Planning`Commission' DATE: J'anmaar°y 3, 1977 • TO: Members of the Tigard d Plan FR: William R Oo1dbach, SUBJECT: WAYSID31; INN PROJECT and Attendant A ccess Road W. LEE., Applicant I . My purpose in addressing the Plannin Com mission by rneans of this letter is to Yp l � g y , bring to your attention some additional information pertaining to the above des cribed subject. ' If you recall, Mr. Lee in his testimony expressed a need for a public access road from Pacific Highway, adjacent to the Mobil Service Station. He based •his request upon the fact that the lending instii.-uti.on required the road to be a necessary part of the project. However, a letter from the lendiig institution • addressed to the Tigard Planning Staff indicates that their only real requirement is for the building to be oriented facing Pacific Highway. They not make any ' reference to the subject access road. (copy attached) l4 urther, at the December 14th Design Review Board,Meeting, the design and .t p approved .ncluding_the access road; architectural fans were aa+ x ov�c,d z Dads blzt, not without al a, . particular point. The 'ire Marshall considerable amount of discussion on this articular oa. serving this district ,stated that, from an adequate fire protection standpoint, an emergency vehidle access road o7'ily need be provided. Since th e Planning in g Commission a nd Staff are always concerned with the safety Y - , aspects of uncontrolled access roads along Pacific Highway, I would therefore recommend that We reopen the Wayside Inn application and consider restricting the use of the access road for :82,1m.ergency Vehicles Only. . . .;. » ..unless of course the applicant can justify the need for uncontrolled usage , Respectfully submitted,' ,. z "a, w '1�tS► k .iw"«aw.vr . pxA f'wc: �'•+ ti . i I h I n I I • • • • »w , ..a,w vr.� k ., l 1 ,.r,..W .nN.c+ ,�I., ...4 1 ...,i.+.. -.,.:M� a .ta»..,.u... i{Afu A/J C..,,..r.as,a ..w.fl. � .,,..A..•., .�MN r � �,Yl,i,�y i. ,.hw,. .i.1.. + �W r,,,: N.. , n w r , 1, Q LC. 5210 S 0, ,. •j,IJ�w fi./���YZ1 .� �.7sµ jr,'.I F.L V/a G C+aj{O .0 w ���.�..�v•-.v r'v '',a, y - V� i[alAZ^"9.'t Y1 C 1• 0d ' W I" •r• .'.••,-{ •*r y`�.1 x-'�'h+"*Y C4'"`'~�.«"4 t'rv.«'Mr i+l•' f U.,i,A a h :J `Mu.i tie•w;.u,��i.L�"�`Gltlpin ;;z'G�k s 3 L."::d 1 r<O unit •••• � 011 S ii a elf 1.C z,.. �C; 3 F;rF i`�-r"'�? i:'• i,4,./1 :3 d.t y L.Ju IJ: :�rft: 2';I°v a '1,1 e:^c}d3 t U`t' a is a1.tib-4.1 GtI" to the 1;‘).1.1.0..,-;.1— t !,Lei..Y coi°'4('_I"1>`io E)s.b � P : r f �..;�••J:.: 'i Y•T 1�n 1 P1...S be .'t?.,-10 t 4;T a4..^ (r.) +r . y 2 P ar 1a ,•=1.1-.1 y 1 •"°'. C" .. �" 1 tr} ''}"�;r •` P3 "'t .I'1' lx k.•.�� rG ��..yy }�•y r yy p r �.:'.!'v�,.C�..�w/' a..r ,1 d.1•:}.. �w �..��r.,4+,4I��.. � r.,G"`.,«"L �� a�A�...•.'yY. •� 71 ,4riA L.' �1t1�.:L�� j:tG L✓c 1.ilV�Ci1�L i d �4C}u�4�I«]�'aw '.t to iy c 3 P it. 1 t X+,.i`0 r.7 {,'li ,j,, ' 1 �rJraw.1. i' Xa' jl t..�....y y.+'i ~ jr n. 1-fA. ("�,,,r,:l'. T " :•t � r++a rA` r C { f 6 L•• }.r-�(..Y.t `y C4, .• p Iµ !•"•' t.4 l!aM,.6o, (6.,, ■dr,.w.y.,-..P A .�' ..,�..r• J'�.r,r-«..T ,-..1 f—7 P .! 1 P a..t'y r, -, +!.t<<ri'„a••1 1..'■•6 iii r r„ F.7 P hl A• V.I rr {,•,.:�. .+,NI.t, it�+ *A,•'. 21 d w w c.•" tiA,i l>f„ J * . .« . ,.,...,. ° ' t A ?A-fay i t;r'+ .! r4 .:+,�'y �'; ry 4.A a. 'mow r"'r.r L,:'w . R 'r. • ,� :. x M y�k�« rl. e h +i r. ,w. y i�.'t+ a; y,n :1144,#_'t 't�A.'. :...i..r n:k..'. ..'(4,1 S r i 11 A.h". J 1.i .fi ,:,:.w M a.r A'i a t..r,✓ r. tip.as 1.�. E I,j iI w«+a ;4...2;4..,, t ♦ �„1V y t ` Y 1.:) y:w «/ t N a.I d • .:r « y . M t r,•, r N 7 T x.r i.+yL. N1 r.♦. Ji • 4+ r stp r r k.tf"a li a 1,, r bi y• 1/4,r ;..1 r - i •4��w Yw r. 4•R,r i ✓ e / C i;r «,L s.«i.y: w +r.f� rr.. .6.. ;1•+ ° 2•a r,/ L•.1 k� � F i A '.•� 4.i� �j'" r �aw.., �u..3 iwN. ...a 1.+;N• aw.� r. r r +•rV a I Y'1 �'.i.N . '� je �.. ti^�M t'1 s L,•+yt ry ..yy�. a r� '4,,;j 1) L � Ns,t. •'� 1 • I.•y 7 4 • b 4 p r •L �. • .+ 1 ••• .10 ..k •••••• 1/4 ..,{w1 � . wA9 +S a 7 N 4 1, f ! j Z .y �•'t r •-y x+• ,L1 + r7 r } r � 1 ,a r N r t .'9 1 �+'w1 }� rE”: '^1 �«.a t r I..,a r ,r i�:yJ T Ci 4 ,«�,.w�` w 4, d w w • 1 { . i..,. .I1.4 L..L.1 1.• ,:a..i Z ta,. M"r' •••ri. i ry � «r u• 'I � r,. 4I‘� C.' �L••�� +"" Y" "�" mil t atr+. d n,.. A � a; G„I t .:y`l '.r4,' �•'..C.. �ti,.�, .t� w,, 'rY'Y} 1• i �u�,�^ ?;„"ti. •1y n{r+ �w r Y Yn r',w.A «.• '.li'.,. • L••r.4 '1 �1.•,�+,4'r.• •L„♦. I•:'4 . �N+ •le MA .w r1;r,.0 i.+f i�r+ M W`ate i j. g .�' �,4 i+.;jiry.;.� +"•aS��t� ( t,Jr��• ,n.r�(`+•?h,L i•�fi I�rr+�',tt t'..ri~i�� "'. �r�� a .�„+iai�r�r£ J 141 •L 'a-.. {,r 5' .. r w r r ;.+ �..a i,r k,a r'Y .+ G .r +N a:. 4�,.r .^r • • t t _ 1.., ...I...—..1. L 'h" SYw-1.'- T l ..t .4, .1. Ja .1 �1-Yu{,.• .,{,N.a. vd. ,A.•4...4r..,..U-✓+..4Jc a✓l..s+J ., • • I !r ..t. r f t,«y c.ii � -..-..+wA:aa,rw....I fy,,,...1 a�.=..,, .y..:r:=b[ .,{y ...,. 1 .. J' '.:I,. r • r„ ... ww � Il ' 1 4"r all I Ip +yr r RN, Leo i y i t'� f'� t1, 2 0, :w.F rr�..I P , • • by the dedication to the City of T 1' accc,3s control (semi-a.r to a stet ) .cro c c c e j'j' •'.. •} �y, pry •fir • - ,T.-4/.e se be C:c.i F ls,',►c-ci tl vA �✓�.�,+.i e 5�..\w'wJ �� 4'r+.1. �wlle -:1:«1.4 w'nS'w�i✓31.».�.:�j(�ti 1e.... ...��«rt v:.�r for n ••'t^4 .( r•., with}.,+� �., ,.�x r�.�y� r^� '�•�•��•�,fit .1. .. , `.: :irGv�/L V'41f. for cor..r.'prl„i6"1aaica t7ibt14 xriae. comb.-Fe.1M!'Jr s ,,•.r,U.IvachoU for ;p n •4 � conditional. use yet Y. �: t,l rat t bo. i s i r •� S 4 ;r •y rS 1'•f'T/1 L 1 .fir�-4��V:,.k i-74� �,'V.Is t•1���h ` L�} i.4 4 �:, f• �«ti'e ♦ i t•r voted to �� '.,Y j.y �� 1'yt 'C»^J �.�r01'� {�► -K w4;� « ry �r y ,y t-,�.�Q' ��i.{r..t,L !i.�' c �".r r...��i �+.,.s� w u�.�.'r3.�4'L'.i�n" r o ,ed t itch the terra cotta root to be ri b:"V"cc 1` color r trl..r L c i n g V i•i e✓b If \co • any dp ‘ 1 n do not r c. .." 1-+",j I , fir • r1. The . . rfo� ktc;f�l;� '� 1 v a I City o x t M ;."�'K r. L 1 t ., "�»»t 41v.. (1 4) 1 e •� of your ti. ,. ra 1)..l�•a• } ^ `i A . L 1. this .. i`C..x ��:5 a{� �..�» '.Ir.:. V �4. 4 1.•4 A d rw"L,3 7-'0 Y .t ' � • w r. � •y f t4' 1 ./ 4« ✓` L.� •x / i. r��+ t..~ �� F t•� f » i w. .� .:� 1- 4• 1 4 •y, � I,r,x i fi L«r,, S f. ti. pi k • • x1.•:.1-�,G.xl.�...1 ry �' •�: �•• yi•iy x• �..' r� 4,,y �x.1w +�} ♦ i:, L 4•�► i� J-I'•{ r•.11.»x.,i` se•rw, `•'r Y;+. :... «. C.,t•.1 r,d. r•..L a.r k..,. •�"r w •i t_ i s «.,L.:.�» V'1.,. .. w t. . !1 t 1 «7 (ti j 1 1"Y t ! 1 wr. r N�.1�,••L.1 w Li.1,+-;:«!r��,. 4L=��.rtrSp .I L.(: �✓ y. t.,J:1. ✓L j, r.l x• h rr .rY "•K / r•.x+ «J .•i,.• � n '1 rt ! �' v n wr+Cf*at.~Ik 4::4" 4f.1, •yJI. j+ lr»��.,• �.L.��.:�� 4i.�.rr .j�� ,J•r u Z•::.�.;•J,r �,:.�.w. .» � ub 1«.Y'� .'..+..r � { r w : J l�r w; 4 c iA ► « d 1'.,•J r:-"t v «0 ti l + ' ¢,'e; 4J ! rA r, . x«.« to, w«ai.'ieri N r.nd/o.Irt, ZifvF':3 ".7�iw.: X�:! r t t c««Jt c ry • 1.4.}'r . 1».i�_.«i i L•:r�T.Y.C..�w f • .. w • i ' 1 . Cwi.'Jt «!.c ate..1 ..l r l�y '4:41.:N w. 1«I a'r/aJ r•:Jl,i I+i 4, JY • • i- • i its: .•« ,...a.l....m.x., ..,.,r.4.....,.s.,..i.x,......,i ..-.:a.....t m...,......./«u.w?;Mn..,...a.,n 0 e M Intl..ti-r ` .SNP E T I ARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD December 14 , 1976 Page I C . Applicant 's Presentation : • o Applicant stated `that there were hose"bibbz.� on • front of building and drip system around the ' tree s would rov• d be Provided at a later time, prc sen,ted •overlays .showing fence height l and ashod for 8 ' just along the front and 6 ' for the rest of fence. . Co dbach moved and Hammes seconded for approval ' with staff recommendations modifying #1 ' to read • the north fence 8 ' tall , the east fence r; ' high east .y� and the north and east fence and gate be sight obscuring, ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW. Applicant stated that the intent was to upgrade the building with a corten canopy and gutter strip so ' 1y �' P g that rust would not stain the building, mansard roof, new windows and doors, bronzed window frames , painted tan concrete walls. Hammes moved and Olson seconded to accept the proposal as presented The motion was passed by unanimous von.ce vote • • 5 .6 SDR 38-76 (Wayside inn I I ! Review of a proposed 120 unit motel on S .4 . Pacific Highway, north of S .W. 69th Avenue . (Previously denied 11/23/76) r A , Staff Report • Staff, updated the previous staff report, presented new landscape findings and a a eater from the fire marshal . o Joe Gruelich, fire mar;shal , highlighted the points • in his letter and informed the Board of the safety hazard a hotel pr,o�';ented o McMonagle questioned the need for 28 ' access I. . especially since the site was already graded, o Gruelich stated in his opinion 28' was necessary r�because of possible traffic � q�� ~ns as so c iat e d with a motel , o McMonagle asked that painted strips and arrows be used to direct traffic on the site . • Y tT • • 1 6 :.,.,,»..nt..»..«,..!...:,..J,.ut�r .......,,„,a..,.J,G.. ..k... "M A.JM .,r✓ ..,. t ,, : k: } ■ . :1,1.ZN11ES T I GARD DESIGN REV I E\tV BOARD December 14, 1976 77 !'a ge 10 y^ ^ 13 . Applicant ' s Presentation : r F1 M • o KE�zn Cole,' a:t cha.tect , adth essed: the widening of the access to 28 ' andr the problems this would present with the parking. He also objected to tiwadening the landscape x agads . o Board decided that the interior 'islands ,slbould . r. b e deleted in order dex to provide zovi de � ador islands on • the end Harrzrnes move aiid Olson seconded to a • o r � .r' �e the 1.1.-o-- posa with the foi.`lowing' Condit c a5: 1 . Landsea.pe islands be 8-10 ' wide. 2 . Automatic sipri.r kler systerrn plan in accordance with finding #2 be provided (subject to staff approval) . 3. All trees be lit' caliper l0--12 ' 4. Street trees l'' caliper.a1a;x.��.r 10-12! be provided 'along future extension of S .W. 69th ( variet yT and placement subject to staff approval) . 5 . Access via the secondary access .,ioant onto S .W. Pacific Highway be limited to the motel complex only . r 6 . Field in1 et catch basin with h � a �,� a i 1. be pro-pro- vided along the northern bank 7 Signing and striping program be deve:l op d sub- ject to staff approval regarding� in directing traffic to S .V17, 69th Avenue and not onto S .W . Pacific Hi ghhwa.y via the secondary access drive ' 8 , The driveway connecting S .W, 69th Avenue with pacific Highway b enlarged to 28 ' , 9. Revised site: plan be submitted for staff 4 • '.'�;appro The mot o,n was approved by unanimous voice e vote. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW:1 Ken Cole, architect , stated that the motel would be four stories, seeded aggregate, exterior walls l/2"K 3/4 revirrock, air conditioning Units would be I hidden y 1 gri:1Al work, mansard slated concrete roof tile,; anoxi red alu inimum clear galss double pan , 1 r { .fly, r , Q • MINUTES 1 IG ARD DESIGN RE VD•. BOARD December 14 , 1976 Page l l u: Internal rain drains, colors : #417 Green Back 'Kelly, Miller_ Paint 70-20 Tamarck. Cook, Olson and Goldbach objected to the mansard roof ,, for the following reasons : architectural incompatible rl:',, with the surrounding area and the color was unsuitable. Hammes moved and Cook seconded (Cook stated he would I vote against the motion to approve the rey '� as b � �.��,ove �l�e ,. presented. The motion failed in a 2 to 3 vote with Cook, Olson and Goldbach dissenting. Goldbach su g g e t'er'ra c t �,�,�st�d that the tc:a.ra Cotta match the tr. irn. The applicant agreed to resent this as a new proposal . Olson moved and Harnmes seconded to accept the arc i- tectural as presented with the terra cotta mansard ;s roof to be a brown color matching the trim. + 1s The motion was approved roved ,in a 4-1 vote with Cook dis-- . ' senting. 6 ADJOURNMENT: Tx ere being no other business the meeting was • r • adjourned at 12 : 25 A �M. �; •1 I , I I . a j h I, 1 • • a x , • STAFF REPORT AGENDA. 5 . 1 . • TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD • December 14, 1976 : /).o � • • The applicant has proposed an alternative to the staff proposal ' of rotating the building 1800 to achieve the required project orientation to S .W. 69th Avenue. ! ' A vastly improved landscape plan has been submitted (see landscape findings) .V ith the modifications suggested it appears to be acceptable . Communication from the Fire Marshal is attached. The State Hi gh wa Y Division proposal for the access pc,int onto • ed S .W. Pacific Highway has been incorporated into the site Plan, . . Adequate number of parking spaces have been provided but the ®' length required by the Tigard Municipal Code has not been 9dher ed to . acceptable location location. is shown or the free standing sign but • A more ac no detail has been provided. • • I , I, • 0, H ', i. .-.L..u , ....w..+ ..4.,I,..drt.:u N ...tul.•,-A a.a J.,:. .. .,.• ., .... ..i. Y,....�,I,... • • • • STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5 .6 DECEMBER 14, 1976 LANDSCAPE FINDINGS : 1 . Landscape islands are shown to be 4 to 5 ' wide. This amount of space is insufficient to accomodate a 'tree and allow room for open car doors. The minimum width of 8-10 ' is necessary to support plant growth. - • :i'' 2. No method of irrigation is specified on the plane An automatic landscape J sprinkler system is advisable for the 'landsca e beds adjacent to the building, bordering the parking lot , and the landscape island. The remaining areas could be serviced by w .de , coverage - impulse sprinklers. 3. Tree ',size has been specified as l 1' caliper.. In order ° '�. � � p .er to insure quality a minimum and maximum tree height ht should be given . The , g • : American standard f or nurser y stock specified 10-12' for lilt caliper, 4. The applicant has agreed r e ed to extend S .W. 69th through his pro- pert at a future date . At that time ,street trees should d be provided in order to be compatible with the rest of S.W , Gain' and comply with the Tigard Community Plan. 0 RECOMMENDATIONS 1 . Landscape islands be 8-10 ' wide. 2. Automatic sprinkler system plan be provided (subject to staff . • approval) . 3. All trees be 11" caliper 10-12 ' . 4. Street trees li" caliper 10 - 12 ' be provided along future extension o f S .W . 69th (variety and placement subject to . r I staff approval) , , r • • • -r i II] [ fiL .A .1. 1 [ H 1 [) 1[11 11. P. O. BOX 286 • TUALATIN, OREGON 97062 • ,PHONE 638.6861 • RUSSELL WASHBURN, CHIEF December' 10, 1976 M iRick Daniels R l r n Tigard Planning Commission 12420 S.W. Main Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 • Dear Rick: On December 9, 1976 I examined the site p lans for the Way Lee four-story motel located at S.W. 69th and Pacific Highway. Since this building will not have any public street access, the only access for the fire department is by private driveways and parking lot. ' This building is more life hazardous than the normal because of two reasons 1 It is a fourNstory building. 2. It is primarily used as a hotel . would like to see the following changed: ,/ 1 . The driveway that extends from 69th up through the end of the • two parking lots past the west end 'of the building around the front !of the building and up to Pacific c Highwa y is only 24 feet. . Since this is the only access to this building, I would ask that this driveway be enlarged to 28 feet. 2. Where perpendicular parking is allowed, i r It may remain but on the access way, from 69th up to the first parking lot and from the parking lot up to Pacific Highway, that.no° parking be, a.l l.vwedF.'.` 3, On the driveway the turning radius at the corners and at the driveway entrances follow the standard city strt et requirements of a 15 foot radius. 4. The parking be laid out in such a way that the private on-site ' fire hydrant will adequate access to it and the standpipe hose connections at the east end of the building have adequate room for our connection. 5. The driveway shows an island in the center of the entrance way at Pacific Highway, and the turning radiuses should' be enlarged enough to accommodate our fire equipment around the island from a Paci fi c Hi ghway." a I ^•a r I I , ` f • • • • • • • s j I -2 • 4 S 6. I also looked on the plans and saw the proposed canopy out of the front of the building. I could see no problem, because the - canopy sticks out no further from the building than the parked in front cars i of the building. In the event of a fire we would • be able to work right over the top of canopy. I am looking forward to meeting with you on Monday, December 13, 1976, and go over any further problems that might arise on future site plan. If you have any further questions, or need further assistance, please feel free to call me at 632661 . Yours truly • Joseph A. Greul i ch Fire Marshal JAG:dm i I 1 , • 1 II L .. • • • 1 �n r t tiK ' 7jP4P • i f ^._ R EC W E DEC 3 1976 Pr, ..TIGAFkD CITY OF TIGARD P. 0. sox 23557 12420 S. W. Main T• • , tgard,Oregon 97223 December '2, 1976 Way W Leew e General Contractors Inc c -c ' 5210 S .E. 26th Avenue C1j Portland, Oregon 97202 ,,, ' Dear Mr. Lee, • , Please be advised that the Tigard Design Review Board at their regular meeting of November 30, 1976 denied your site develop- ment plan and failed to approve the architectural design request for a proposed four story 120 unit motel on S .W. Pacific High- way, north of S .W. 69th Avenue . The denial was based on find-. ings that the site plan was deficient in landscaping, lacked . . proper design for internal traffic circulation, lacked detail` 4 design for the Pacific Highway access point,' and failed to address the concerns of the Planning Commission Decisions of the Design Review Board may be appealed to the City Council by filing a request stating the reasons for appea]. with the City Recorder within 15 days of the Design Review r• Board.action. Sincerely, `gin°- ..,..... Richard Daniels , Associate Planner 4 RD: sf cc: Building Offici,.6 , City Attorneyt +n l; Note: The following acknowledgment must be received by the , • rteeil (14) days of your t 1 City of Tigard Within fob. � receipt of this letter . ralltre to return this acknowledgment may result in action' by the City of I Tigard„ 1 _ heye, by acknowledge this letter docUmenting the action n of the Tigard Design Re 1,ew 3oard: • n, g '1x , Da. e ulq„1' ..,. ,..„,,,., .....,_. .,,,.._..,, ,..,, ...,. ... ,.. ........,_ . ..... . „,ry. ..,.,., ...,,,,. r, ... ,..xv w r, w1.wi.rr nvv+nw, n r wY, ,r n,.p'.i—r'r,•rr"-r:3n .... ,....w u.n . _ ^. ,.. ...,, :•'! ` ' a 0 ..._J... ...,..+» .. t. ... ,.,a,. , , .,« --...._r .J,.u. •.t w,lu. ... ;..., .k...H d....,.....U. .r.,. .,se._.,..Ja,..k.-<;...da-•,u.i,.4.. ,«u...,,,.,...., m, ..,1Ma... .,.I��.r..M IiL i... .rH..Y..»..-T,r.:wt«.u..::,iaA:. • • ` r� ITT I' 'Sr TIGARD SITE DE\TELOPM,MENT AND ARCHITECTURAL DE,,S I GN" REVIEW *BOARD Nov•crnbe 30,x 3 0 1 0'70 -- 5 :00 P.M. ' General Telephoins 12460 S .W. Main Tigard, Oregon 1 . CALL TO ORDER: Meeting was called to order at 5 : 15 by Chairman l�Mcl�Mona.ge. • ° 2. ROLL CALL: Present Hammes, 1■Icl\ioxnagle, Cook, God,dbacia and Olson . Staff Present : Daniels and Edwards • 3. MINUTES : Cook asked that the Board delay approving the minutes ' 4 until the end of the meeting. • e • r GO�,z�UNxG TIONS w No 5.1 UE S I GN R.mv I EW1■T: 5 .1 SDR 38-76 Wayside Inn Review of a proposed four story, 120 unit motel on S .W. Pacific Highway, noxth of S .W. Goth. Avenue SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW A, Staff Report : Read by Da.niel.s B. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that this site pa an be denied and any resubmission include the following changes : ' •, . 1 , Orient the building away from Pacific Highway by rotating. 2 Incorporate the Planning Coraarrmission conditions into the site plan or provide the Design Review Board with the method for achieving cornpliiarnce, d;y 3. Provide a turn ing r'adi us adequate for vehicles in the canopy area to retur• central t • parking �.o t . a:r to the c.c.n w-e a�. . t 4 . �� �el o P signing program which assures that primary y access is gained via S .W. 69th Avenue not S .WN'. Pacific H i ghw ay 5' Develop a 3 �andsc..a ,l'n lr 1 M r. �t � cl� Develop i softens of the additional building height, screens the • Portland General. Electric substation, all •• 'F of the site and i.n�.ludc;s an automatic irrigation system to provide for adequate maintenance C Appli cant ' s Presentati oi. : 4 o Tom McDonald, project manager y ` • • discussed . the economic a pects of the raoject, , e P Gc ili s Highway orientation ti 9 W rofu..e.v.aer-14 0 ,�• �� ( ...e n _ -�., ,A MM1 • • Y+w k,.-r-. ,_.,.",.::A.i,a 1 ....... r..t..., -r...,k. _..,«.4}r"s.. ti.l__ ..w3.. :M.., ; r_ ..>»k "u-., .. ..L„« . .,wr. .....•,..e:,_, TIGABi) DESIGN REVIE44' JARD November 30, 197'6 Page - conceded tb a t the project 's grading bad been done at their own risk but that they should have been informed of the possibility that the building might be changed, suggested a compromise of an additional canopy on the south side of the building with signing designating i t the main e n t ran c e, . ,.� .. -;. iar,c�poed posting a bond for the extension of . S .W. 69th until such a time as the street alignment is determined, ssib , d�,sc:7is,<;ed different possibilities for the areas '' • r • labeled "future building” (motel , office complex) TD Board Discussion : . . o Board discussed traffic_ circulation on the site . • 0 McMonagle asked that the applicant present a detail. of the proposed traffic island per Highway Division ' b request . o McMonagle and Cook criticized the compataba.lity of the building ia relationship to its site . 0 McDonald stated that by having four stories they were conserving land Plus allowing far the zunber y f units n e e de d e co n.o m i. al .y. © Board discussion on the continuance of, 2 ,V. 69th • s J Avenue, gf`niora l consensus was that the parking lot N should connect 3th ry i i 69th lv n u e and that the �'. remaining portion of the street could be developed , at a later t i m e o McMonagle itemized ed. the Points agreed upon S .W ..W 69th Avenue to connect n.ect with the Wayside I nn pa;x, ki��ag '.lot fS . - a convenient tux n radius be pl a nne d i n front o f the canopy (shifting parking stalls if necessary) , • n Y details of the traffic island and Signing be ubrn7tted, no parking g;be allowed on S .W. 69th Avenue, VVVi4.' , 1 light in the int,ersection of SW► 60th Avenue and U. S .W. Pacific Highway was a 'nec:essity . i - o Discussion on ` di, 'ferent` m •ins of financing the light . ryl McDonald ar4lied that the City Council determine what I • i I Mr y be e t s lair share YV yl d be V , , • q. I i y • . r . A I, u TE s l TIC''TARD DESIGN REVxBW 'h ARD II a s,.w o v C xb e x 30, l 97 G v, Page 3 4 Cook moved for denial of the proposal , no second was given . ' a o DiS cussat n on building orientation a.nd. landscape cape 1 Plan deficiencies . Staff contended that the east portion of the lot was inadequately screened, landscaped beds were too small and under planted, no irrigation plan was Presented and no landscaping was shown for future I bua.l din g area. n ' Goldbach moved and Cook seconded that the proposal , ti' be denied without prejudice and be resubmitted with f the fee waived on December 14 with l staff helping on, ` any revisions . . The motion was approved by unanimous voice vote o McDonald asked that the Board give some indication as to whether the building design was acceptable so that construction of pre-cast panels could pro-- ,: ceed . o Board agreed to a preliminary review of the • architecture . : : o Cook objected to the mansard roof and asked that the building be architecturally compatible to Coco ' s and Plankhouse , Olson moved and Hammes seconded that the Board indicate ` ° that the building was acceptable , Olson arwked that the motion be rescinded and restated c as follows : : oason moved and Hammes seconded to indicate to the applicant t•h a t the D o ar d reaction t o the p r e c a s t con- crete panel s was favorable . • The motion ,w was approved by unanimous voice ,rote 5 :2 SDR 42-76 -Partex , ,of a loading dock ramp and fencing to an industrial Review , site on S .U . BIInzlker Street east of S .W: ilal1 Blvd. A . Staff Report : read by Daniels B, Staff Recommendation : Staff recommends approval as submitted with the addition l r of landscaping 'adequate to ,In nxrnitze the visual impact of the screen fencing C Appp s p.r'es:n'tataon F r7 ' J • • u. „t ..n�.+ .xx...x.w..�.,..,. .rw.:., w.�l.. i.„...�.r.,..»...4.m.N..7_..,.,a..-.r.. .•a:..rr�r.•Y._h.„w.,n»..,ihf"4r•a��s .4n 4 „x,..v., ...« i..z ...., •.,.>..r4...-,rirm.�r.. ,� ,• • " r rA . " STAFF REPORT • AGENDA 5 , , • Site Development and Architectural Design Review Board, • November 30, 1976 5 :00 P.M. 12,160 S .W. Main St. Tigard, Oregon r DOCKET:: SDR 38-76 REQUEST: review of a proposed four, story, 120 unit Motel LOCATION: On ,5 .W Pacific Hwy, North. of S .W. 69th . • r APPLICANT: Way W. Lee/ Ken Cole , . 'Basic Facts : • 1) The site is designated "General Commercial" on the Tigard ' ' Community Plan and zoned ''C-3, General Commercial . " 2) A Conditional Use Permit (CU 30-•.176) was approved by the Planning Commission on November 16, 1976 to allow an additional story ' i h with the following conditions : • .. 1 . The r,.ccess onto S.W. Pacific Highway be combined with r the existing Mobil access Point and be designed for P . right turn only into and out of the site with approval of the State Highway 'bivisiora . 2 . PrimarY access to the motel be provided on S .W. 59th Avenue with the parking lot driveway connecting to it on the south . 3 . S .W. 69th Avenue he developed on a 60 ' right-of-way to City commercial street standards The lbeati0n for , , continuance through to the triangle to "be approved by • the Director of Public Works . 4 . A traffic light to State Highway Division standards be placed at the intersection of S YW Y 69th Avenue and SW Pacific Highway if the, highway div i sion: warrant study .o determines that it is necessary, 5 . This approval is for one building with a maximum of 40 ' in height t or four (4) stora.os 6 . The secondary access point (between Mobil and Wayside Inn) + 'designated by a sign 'encouraging r w�.l 1 a.rc�t be r�e�.sa�, x,gn its use as an entrance poi nt t pf rr �' r I yt t, :f.� .x S 1 ) The site slopes substantially away from SYW, Pacific Highwa y with a change of 761 from the road to S W. 69t.h A•\7e1iuez Extensive grading and filling has occurred in the Iast, two . ,wcµ1eics �,n r;+c�orr. anc::e With a grading Perm t Issued November 1 , 1976 . (#1151) The c ,;tc:ns1 re grading has caused all natural but aq,;few txicer,:s. to be rc 'niO xod. The building or±enta.t c n i s contrary to the `actions of the Planning g Commission and u t)11 ? oc_ o . ' ''. Y �•+-..~ • • '.::1 a..0......., c . .4......lam .x,)11M �a,+u.,.. x. ., 1 } ..i� .. c.. .._..�w.. Ma. ,.... (,.,. ..-i::�... .r1i.,... ..,..rr,.. ..µM,�'4..u.1 jpp , T S Ak P REPORT Agenda 5 , l i Tigard Design Review November 30 1976 • 2) All actions by the Planning Commission in reviewing the sub division of this property, the Conditional Use Permit approved ' I on November 16 1976 and 14-73 (expired), have been towar ds, orienting access through a controlled oll ed intersection and a looal 1( • commercial street rather than along S .W. Pacif ic Highway. The site plan and building plans envision a drive-through canopy t; for registration on the S .W. Pacific Highway side of the building over) but no turn around is provided to get to -Lhr main parking lot on the south side of the building. The proposed configuration encourages the use of the secondary access point contrary to its intent and the required design standards have not been incorporated into this s site plan , By rotating the building 180° a site plan more in keeping with the intent of +Irr all a r evious City actions is attainable . Also involved is the shifting of the building 20-25 feet west . This shift would create a driveway along the eastern edge . This driveway d provide for better traffic circulation whether or no would � not the building is i~otated. This would eliminate some parking and would necessitate relocating the swimming pool . 3) Section 18 . 58 . 080 (1 ) of the Tigard Municipal Code requires' landscape islands 70 ' on center in parking lots . The site plan i • ..•,....,..,. .a+..,s, .... ...xa...i.:» uf.. ...-.,s....,„,....:,.. w w..i::..... ..d f...... ..-,t.•..4.M ,,a, ,•.......» ,;ti.w+..,...1...,.,:.,.«u..d r4.« r; STAFF R EP©1�'T Agnnnda 5 .1 Pa. r 0. ' III STAFF RECOMMENDATION: • Staff recommends that this site plan he denied and any resubmission include the following changes : 1 . Orient the building away from Pacific Highway by rotating. . 2. Incorporate the Planning Commission conditions into the site plan or provide the Design Review Board with the method for achieving compliance . 3 . Provide a turning n a d au s adequate for vehicle9 in the canopy area to return to the central parking lot . ► 0‘,3A1)461.3)0,4,75 x assures that primary access is 4 . , D��elop a signing program which assu 1. Y gained via S .W. 69t h Avenue not � Pacific Highway. 5 ._ DeveJ.o a landscaping plan which softens the impact of the � � g l additional building height, screens the Portland General Electric substation , includes all of the site and includes an automatic irrigation • system,'to provide for adequate maintenance , • • • I I; • C c r , , I I a I .. • I __.,,..._ ._.... ., war„ H>.i•1il L lka,. al...:.r4...+i..m w..y.ns Ir.rn:,. .-+win•+ ,...'1wr..r..7<m ' NO • thr lrt!y la harne anuner8hip ' rAd iv, 73,76 taut 13urrtside.Street,�!'t�rtlrrtirl,(1rtgort 97211 iWW1C�:1t,Is ftx1NKL'Ix' '!'cal 2,1.1-,3(111 November 24, 1976 I � { I ' City of Tigard �I , I a • , Planning Department Tigard, Oregon Gentlemen: It has come to our attention that the City of Tigard is investigating the possibility of re-orienting the Wayside Motor Inn toward 69th Street instead of Pacific Highway as shown on the architectural site plan. • lv9 l Our loan commitment to Mr. Lee on the project was made with the assumption that the front of the property would face Pacific Highway and we would not be interested in funding the project if orientation had • to be 69th � We must consider 69th a minor, "not even a through" street; mot or hotels must be oriented toward a major street or highway with its own identity. Very truly yours, Sitf^IIPIT1E'C..al kli.P12 hitr)Ii1\iT4,1t�J INC Warren L. Kirby Vice` President: WLK/dp r. • jI / L 'r r i r1jt tl,fir t,att ,Cl'RAi �'.P`j Or 1+IC,H!t;rst�rtttl�,Ed/ , 1r'a Sat!Jose,Sint I71e1 vt Ctt1(f i'ttt,ir ' 0 • • `.. � i r ».a+•.L.»a«,... .twnaaYwwis!4w t. V�F .... ., .. ,/.'u'`r ' ., e.,:..'• .V _.a.r / I • • tt3�..,t�:. � � •,� .f* ..r, ..u.-.i' .-.1a�.�+J,tai,,,..,;1 wrA«w»w+.»x.r• w...»e..;:�« t...u4-.. • La,.:'.:.H.;:i .i13M1iG4V}1 1�1 151�#1 flWpfil �ftiftlt3tit�ttt(t1�ft.tlftitt4:s21isurt(rattultrtt�tlt itJr ttltll.tt YtelG.atrttunk+urtc.aaruuau.ao.,a:,a>„ dw• µ+ • w w r. 4n"t w` SITE D '.rVET,OPN1ENEI` PLAN AND 131:.1.1\/":1:14,'W M • Plan Review • Architectura1 Review Fee 13,oceived a Receipt, '.APPLICAT'IO'N yz De.-be Received zo,„2 6 2 Tigard Planning. Commission 12 44.0 t7!"I Ma .n St,. , •.I., . c , ur. 1.k , 639--4171 Pro ect Title Wayside Inn IJate Filed 10 "Z Project Address ,3 Act° ∎ Tax Map No. • Tax Lot Noe Lot #3 Owner/Developer day W. Lee General Contractor, Inc. ._..w� .._ ._� : Address 5210 S.E. 26th S eet, Portland, Oregon Telephone 23� .059 Owner'?s , Tel phone' w__._ • � S i z/star e' Are ��ec t. Kenoj ole & Co P.S. Tele p h one 2$3- 252 E • 1`11,1sc17.I7x�T.CoN OF PI O121t rh 'Y • P:ro csed 'Use ��� �.rni Le S . Ft.'.�..� Motor-Hotel One 120 Total Firs - ,56 5� 4 . ,,...rMww.4.rlMr.wwuw.r 4.i.+r.rw.r.w.Y.i.i . u Y+rr M4w•+vhM -. ..Y�+w«w.�.w yr..wHJY+....> '+u� 2.79 Acres . ' �. ... .w_ Tot, Sq. Ft. of J3 i1Cc:%nF.�s 36 (l .m 63 ) Site 'Size 121 S 't. : x4837 a . pi n 600. ,(4.O • �Sq. t of Paving 571769 �• Anticipated 'De e7.0 mcnt Date As soon as ossible y Anticipated nevelloptmie,n.t ].Phaarsos One w4u.M++�.wrY:.V•w! MwW�u�u+n_•✓w,wM:w>rM.an.>r:w.ux-�wi�'wlW.xw�xuWl�wl,wn+A.HM.rw+.w'Iw}•+'ri..uTIWw.+.t�W!M+..+_r+wMwrl ' is � :: Mr#ns,r1.M' •. ' V aluatI on $1 13 0,oOO.00 - :........,.+w.,.w-w..,s«w„ ....«ww.,,:«.:....wr,.,....+..w.«..,wr.:..,ru.,.r..�.w.... r.e.,ww•,..,...w...,w+r..m.u�.�..a-+.�...w-,+.r+....-w.., rw�.,.w..+.r.,«..w...+w„i....r._++r+� x,...�.,..+-�++....«w.+.rr.«.n.�-«....+..:wr.-.1 1)0. .� NOT WRITE �I3 4-11,OV�r THIS LINE r.w.....�.•� ..�..�.,,,:��x,.....d,»..,�...,.�:.»..,....w......�..,...�.,»...,...,....�..-��.,�.........:,...,..«.._,�.y:._.,..«.».»,..... . Wa.. Special Conditions Dedications .uw.:..w..,w..w.;w,.w.www...�.w..,.w..+k-•+;.w......+.w�.. Ot er �, W.NMM,..un...a.M,ww'wWFMw.aOUN.ti ,..wn+ruWAwr.uW.rM,w++,w.�ra.Fara,wr..N'..,s.m+a. u.•wuHx wwwr+Mw...+.n�+�WNMenw.iry..LiryW«,+w+'Yw+�w...a.wr+N.r.l . ` :na :- Inspection b Data i�.4'Y , .,x�... .,.... V ,,..., t .-' ..., .::_•.....,-w.w,.a,M.,..wfd>n.woa.;++n.wuA crty ..,., .. ,�„ c. . .„ a .vu......,. . V : ` - 7)1 1 „ ctletv t-1::::4113 9:41 nAGOsoad- a iraiLoW 544,, ‘4,--vD\16 9441. .r - V'Q eta : ` 1:; - -Q Si Nei ktio",ivr, c_i_ 3-1-1)4. '91 Or "Z"1:7U:37 y : ;777F: m, V ,. . T.077004., 77 r V77. 77:77 O.o -CO .._- b V •4".6 . , • • • • 1 I 1 ,. ,. ,. .,...,,4-"a.1,..,..,, 4:I.w.,r.J,.A..:,.t:.«+4,..w��.,.µ,w.,N.t,,;r:�,;.:«,:„�,:::a.,..,.,+r.+r_.,..,•,rL��.+��...,d.y,„.rlr-.;,..,.w..b..,._,.,r,l...-,,.1.�..n.,'�+,n�.'•;.I.:,ri,:; .N.,+t..1.:,...5..,.1 l I 1 ° = I } • • r,. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • I I I ; I I I � , • • • _ I r a I I • .y • ' r . i.. ...w a ,� ,.� e t•,. ,.. .,..,,srfr,,.r.. t..........aA+,.,..r•u.•,-.:»1 rc.,,,1.41,«.d::.t=...*.+.4,.1:,:4',:1_1a,:;.:....-%-........,.r,.d...,,..,u,-u.d:r:_..L;.rE.w .r,.-n .,....N.t.,t.gut...a...-„,-.a-......<,u...,..aazrf+..1�.ReFb..'.WL.a,n7+i,n...A.........r.,t,i..,.st;a,w1...R.+.,»,n,Y,k..w.+Af4,»an.....Y..,,..waJ,"...X,..L..w..e,L.....L,+,,...,.iwiMr_raNZi441:.,:i„A.1:L..4.:aKly.iwf4JU..-:1 W::tii:,,.u..,+',Y..,S.f-"JAd,{.—• .J'a,'a:nH.... • 4 , t r . 1 . , ,, i r 1 MEMO , If'. TO z MR/MRS/MS '''''''' P R . FROM: : PHONE: 04.x`" .,,•,• ... • MESSAGE: , ,,,,,,,, f �M i L • • gg a MEtSACE B'', ... ' a° „ f • • • • • ■ • • O. I. � 1 .sv,, ...,. ......,,,.. .... , ,.-,.,.,. ,...., ., .` ,..,.. ,., o•.. r. ... a. . .v. . snl r,u .e .r.rn, �r it r . „r... '� ,I � ,_r.— f