SDR34-76 POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
. ,
„ i \ a ,,
I
•
5 i.. 1.. _.A..-.4✓:. I..l.. .l, (
i
.. . '
:: '" L, 0, tc'"9
.gip m. . t
. 0 � #U to
` t e. ', qon 07223
I
\. SIkt 34 6
your 9,rpporty Gla 'sat and 'T'is(4x4 to T4q4rei vao iuspooted. fox. p 400,,. .
w til the lao4s0aPi4g Plan. ,O ' as $o i x I4# 1011 . ox r of l
' l .o Xmodo ink alOt ' o"h, r > ` p'ptl' 4 '}i , sa toOts#ry �iumot u$
R.RFi}��ldr'4�'ff;�e01. ,, 1:VYY' 10,iWi .j7 2,4id `M .. A."+rar � �F *t �MP°0 �.No.�.. Y,d'e7 M1io 1M 04ti g 'N �' ,
.�I�, +�yyinn
. l U y O` � 5a � � ire •o ; o b�4 u t.t . ' ' loo o4 t o
;� +od a ' Z a fro c,� x; ta, i �d a t i , t rifi1tI
. ' rt` rt „ram luorz ,#
A
1
. . ,. , A. .}yy� y r�y,'�Q qy 1�. /yyy� �iy,$. {�µy,�py' j y�{,�p� ryypu� that' �yq 9'�1 yy'��F
. V?T• 4#::q+ '#ei++`7�1 II IV *041'Mt065.+,t(ztt ^N MI Qf„I•^M '"r' rA r'1' 1V4Y...V* rol eako •��� 1,
I �L
I s
I
a
r
I
it ,,.
'
t)1",,g y
I:
I
I
I
i
ILI
I
{
I I
1'
!I 0r If
f/; 1i
,r L
•
•
,
t, yy
se
„,,,,e-e-44&p,
.. f"...j ."'ll--,-p
,
-7-- 4,t„ .„t,,,,,_;„,,,,2 de 4.,;,,.x,,,,....94,,,,,,,,, "e , ,1 ,
,+
/ ,;_,,.......,..„ - e'e..f.e.4,-,-,,...4.7,-e..”, e-.1.-"Szioe ' •."--c-i
- —
/ 4 J
. ..."' ....4 eee th'f.' .0*..,,,,e- .......p 4,
w
. -ate '` "ii ,G„' 1" j `... a,... .. �...,
- .. ,,,.� ..w , '....,.. �IE117�dR��•�% �...i..-. ...,/f�� +V�� s n ,.� ,,., . ....-:u.a .. . ...
......,f
-
•
. � ` . " 7 � � ,„, - ,
, .w... .. .a. ..., , ,.,.,„ r ,. , ,.,
1� �r
I
I4
s I";
I
I�,�9l r.v. / • � X
n i, ' i l� 1 i 1 A F r....''
r ' \j�•
110 „
\I '
aA
•
r
•
otivIspi ,4 ”
, .. A m,.,.w.u,..:,«» . . a...v�._ ,.•.1,,.-ww,..m,,,,,, ,,,,,,«,,w„,.,,,.«w,.,,,,.,•.,,.+«.«.,,..,..,,,,...«a.�.,,,,.,.,»,.r",...,.,,w, >.I 4A,. Op 16117 '
r. a
1'11'117 "T1.-eznIEcT• WIA5 I
«••*•.,.,. . ,,..«:.w,..xa»..,., � «. «.wt„w.M..,.,, - wuo-�.,,, w - .w. ,..4,,,,,,,wwl.. ,«h,�•,+,-n m,wyw.,w..,.w�l.wa�.>.a.,..+-w�,w.wa......w.....y,�ww..,wa.r..a..--,n..r..w,xw,arr
. ti. V�,_i af►V I Si O 1 1.
.--
.
r
•
I 'I
I I
I ,
•
Y
._ ,,. ,.a,.,., „ »,;-.w.,,<,w m+x,,,,, �.>,,.«.w....>..,ar..7.r�+,...,+,,..,�. ...-.,-,.»«,�,x,A.,,,.,«,..rM,..w,...u... .... -. ,,«,»,-x,a ,a•,,,.»w,„u..„.w.,._4�„u,.,e,.w.,w,..,,«,,,u,.,,;,u ..•:.:,.,.mr.nr.,,,o-r.auwa»u::,:aa,•.
i
p
l
a ,
I
{YI
6
t� �I � I��� � �. !f V. 4, �? ■ ,
+
. i ...,.- ...Il..il,.,...'w ,_ .:; .,....,..::-, ... r ;...0 i.,:.. ✓.. :.,..,.r, ;-r, .I...d,e.»,...a t.,.i+au..Y» - wJ :W'. ... ..,..t«,,..Y.: "s'a 4.. ,a#w
' ,.4.« ..+..✓.,. ..1n,.,wx• _'tw /-„.,.; _ ..:..4i,• -ln.'...x nY:.,;rrr ,,r...a t nl f -,nl, ri.0,;, U:r ue._.::r..
4,” Ta a anti `j ,Yn' owHr. GP•
W* T1 AR .el. 1 ,
'- ,, P. O. Box 23557
12420 S. W. Main ,
Tigard, Oregon 97223 1'
'
September 17 1976
da
M i
r
,, �; victor S'eeber 4y .
. 9340 S Ar. w t7 Hill Street
a Tigard,mi and Ore�nn 7 9 22
3
,
' Deer Trr eeber; ,
•
please be advised that the Tigard Design Review Board. at 4
r
their regular meetin g of September 14 p 1976, a��rovedyour request
r,,
for design reveiw of a proposed 11,000 square foot industrial ware- "�''
house at S,�ti a Grant Street and S.W.�S.err. Tigard Avenue. This approval
is subject to satisfying the following conditions
1. An additional 10 Na.honia should be added along the
back parking lot line.
2. ?pplicant and staff determine which of the existing I °
r r 1 r
,
oak trees should be removed New oak trees 1 - �_ '
calo4oer SI tall shall be planted in their stead ad and i .
additional oak trees be added along the west property
line,
•
3. Marge shade trees (preferably oak) and shore pine
• should be planted. along Grant and Tigard St. (shown . ,
in red on the plan) .
4. irrore deciduous and evergreen shrubs be added to the '
landscape buffer,
5. A vine maple be added to the center 'orner planter
on the east side.
6. Gravel or stepping stones added =,Irn'ird the hose bib�b ' 'r.
� � be ,,
at the so''theast corner and shrub, be add sd to the
remaining crop
1 . The architectural. design was ci'�r r"ov e e *" f�e
.J,J.�le (,a ..+.� was p w �'++ G�w s y..,�.r\J J�ce...«,.1w d. J
If we on be of r'n,x' further assistance please do not hesitate
'' to contact me at this of. ice:
y , . } -i ,�cMrel-r
a 7 -1
''?.� Richard Leniels
,3•, �■' JJ.w r!OCi:,,te Planner
',rJ
,
,, 1 s
1 1 w
J 1
. 1
r n
• I i /
o.v•: ay m.i. 44, f 14«4i4 .;- iy.7hx,L 1...,..ax�p.' Ja. ,4 s d am fs V..y.alib:} a
Gl
i f
page 2 r September 17
1 fI
I
w ,
Victor Seeber ''
Note: The following acknowledgement must be received by the City 1. .
I,, of Tigard, within fourteen (14) days of your receipt of this
letter. Failure to return this acknowledgement may result kN j'•'
in action by the City of Tigard. ,
I hereby acknowledge this letter documenting the action of the '' ,
° Tigard Design Review Board. I have received and read this letter I
and I agree to the decision here documented and to aside by any
uerms • /or conditions at cached.
�, and/or
Signature
ri
'a.l e No.
1i •
/' •r a 'e.
a.
' h•4 /
J, I
4 I 1
fI
I I
I ,
Ir
' •a
V t 1 r • I I C i IU!' + l �w. s
s . ;., , .
M S',1TA., ' l r:1'r()r*r.'1" �� I
A en a 5 . 2
^� r� 7
Scr,iatr xrnlarr 1. ' 1976
i^7 xi ;I.'cl �'t 1 t�ti!.rone it rl
1;21 (gO SW Main rriF ard) Oregon
DOCKET: S%axe 34w-76
REQUEST R�.c+.cV.i.(W O. a 12r(..)posrc(:1 11.,000 square ` oo'tr isradust:rii .1. building. 1, .
• , LOCATION: So7+r'Gx'ti'1,,t,,s t c�.,o.iri°a.Oii of S.W. r tgar.*d and W r, Grant Avenue !,•
AP1}T,'""CANT; r�lac'�,•
• .i . J34A,.SIC FACTS
1
1 . T110 s7:i..t o Is cd.c:r4:i r. .t o c l °ty.r i.a,I t on the Co mmun i t y
P1.11.33. and ./,.„..,,..)3'3.0(1 M-4, :trc11,rst,rri1a.1•
,pI•. 2 . The ;P1 tr r.1a•r .arg C or rua.1:i.s 3iori: csonrl i.t i.ona1" Ilse 1.3c r:Yrrm .`1;
:11D "7(3) on 7/20/76 fca:r err i.31r1i.7<str:i a1,. building rand
to iryla� �
c `:lax�c;� from ' to , •
30 ' was (;)11 Sc;;pwt irr'iaor 1, 1976 Couc..i.ti onr" of 'the
I �• •{ 99 yy^� ryry �t ry i p y ry t7 t"y
C�t.)1�C 3dt.A.4JrAL � LI(:) .�Cyrrr111 't ktw�r 'lam
f l.i
nrai
• 4 1. . f51.rwr,:t,ic?n to e 1,31 1(.3(.�a]i. rriprovc31n1( nt di,st :.i:rw.
on S .W. Ti ,;ar°rd and S .W. Grant to be executed Prior to
.;wrcxarlt e of building permits ,
• 2 1)(- dt.r, trc:on t) " 10 " a,lcanf S .W. Tigard St . and S .W. Grant nt St ,
130 r,•' t»ie..rrt<:r1 prior to t'4:-,31.1.11".1. k r of la>a7 1.r 7za i)c''1•rx11.1:,s. •
•
3 . Roy i c. wv thhe ' ,
t :ai pa~r:ai)c:r°ty 1 .f no tra lareyi do an effect tvr . c•!r;}c.cw ainn to
'L h 2 single f arir 1 1.y d!v(' 1.1, i,r g to tho west,
• ABM 4 , Atic,civa t..o pr'C. v i s, r r,tt7. for tar.ifat a IIUR1..1(,')l of rind ,a.c,c.,(' S to
p�f 1,1 1n t rar.(( Crt.'C k Clx"��t° ° ho ilc:vv�ol talac:ail. `[„1 s
rr)t°'r 77
J f y 01.V `pS i t t:l y�r t .i c.�rr� a(.„In It n h:„i o r l;t c 3 cl c: el a]n rn r �'c'o k. H
t♦ r r r s '� ♦ '� g rs I Y�',n .rr�.,r i i "Y� c ' a 1"1"Y'1`"51posed .1,.1 y 000
• T
1 ft_r a nt:.1a1: .t.rr a l hu; 1:da x g In 'r' �,r r
- t- The r ti r. r .r v. a. w ,b �,. r � i Crook
. i r 1.he .,�t,;to i; x two1 t. +. < 1rl�( f`1 at 1..r lwrn ; f;on 7 � ;c) ,.r + Fan no .
/ I t•: "k 1*;1"*.e•r:�C'�r 1 • ti n s,. as a 1.31,1,,f-3't a r'r't� n
3 . The „� s
t r Y? :t l
.. � t r on the
�;� (1,1c' :���a.r't,r�rarr��:�i��� I ��ar����, �r,��t., r"� r�. ' ! t��:>1 r.. �`p�rnl.lw� � �a�:,,x.�l. .�cJ4.. ,.�n� ���,w
t t' f. the m r°
a+t,r r� two :=;�_r j �:?o ,�r r.�t 1 2 �v 1.4:�'"=i '�t°I a G�� r�?�.� the �.�'I:�, '��X ' ��"s.� 10
1••�1 a i tt ,n t:h e .-r)4x t h € air 1;i .1.:fia e l u r.°1. .ra ton `,1Islorthern
�r'rd "°r -t`e. ay ral 4Li)t,. north . i
r, 1,
o ., t to r "r'f r):t ryas c the ,.e bac1 U7_r .I di.1a
The .c r. r s,t plan rz c. x �(. � a.
1"toi .JhL I `aadsoap.1'Zig, c:)if—street park parkino and tl,is"„,ee s' l'c;: Ui;rri.,rSonCs
” 1 oi' the Ti a:rr c1, Cud
11 . , rl tr
a�� o ,,�r r a y� 11,a t.i,1 x),il 1 e to serve ih
1 1 X11 a+, ..4, 1,-. ...m.�.•M•�. �y: „
r 1 i 11 l ,d ►2t `' ' ,
/ .,,. r .. .r..:✓<.u.u.....JF..«....-,,a.:ia,._s.....,,„_J:�w-.w.,at...::..ka.....wJ..t.;h.."w.y:rw.au.u.iJ,..!:a •,�f
I'd
r
''J t I r •
STAFF r
REPORT ,
I �. Agenda 5 . 2
(' y
i
.� n Review ,.
September 14, 3 976 ,
6. All conditions , attached by the Planning Commission have been, ;,
\
satin sf i,ed or are in the p :`oc ess of being so . _
h
7. NPO II states the need of mai ntdin.r.ng. a natural al scr- een of ,,
plant material along 1?atano Creek.
' 8 . The Landscape plan specifics 16 i+1r7hon a Oiogon Grape along
the back parking lot, line, i\Ja.hori.i.c a should be 4 ' on center
. . for adequate screening. '
9 . Of the seven oxtsting' oak noted on the plan several are
either do ad or in a clete r tora,`l.,od condition.
i
'" , s 10 The 7 a.nc1scapo Plan shows low Plantings wit1h an occassional
small tree and a row stcect trees. More street trees would
be norclod to is rcen tha site and keep the building in scale .
11 In general, the plant materials aro spaced too far apart
£or adequate aaatc impact and weed c:c ni:�'o1
•
12. The planter in the center corner on the east side of the •
building spoei.fl s three skimp i.a. The addition of a vine
- maple in that spot would help ,soften the effect of the building.
13 The southeast corner specifies lawn area around the hose bi..b
r p y � I 1
This amount of lawn �tfi�c.�aa1_�1. c��az7. be a rrr�ri.ratc�x-rra.:nc�c� problem.
R1 t,,OMMEN1JAT.rONS '
r `• y
1 . An additional 10 itJo honi a should ho added along ghe back
' parking lot line .
2 Applicant and staff determine ‘7,hiGh of the existing oak
i,recs
should. be iclr ovcd . Now oak trees 1" 1 L' c.a
l i
per
8 ' t all shall be planted .Now
their stead and additional
oak
. ' . trees be adds:d along the ',Neat propo 'ty l .iarc,
3 . . La, ge shade trees (preferably o ak) and s a a y
pine should be j
Planted along Grant a n d Tigard '
St . ( shown in red on the Plan) . /'
4 , More dc,oG3 d1.coa_a 7 and ov,;rt;rc;c:n shrubs be added to the landscape
' buf i'nr
be Y. tJ .o the a corner r -
5 , C+']r;a{ maple c' 1;] �� . Cl Cl
C E:"7
� x 'tcr
P -,t cp
�. aii �.x on the
east side. 1 /
..C . Gravel or stc..oping s t o C S be added e
d ax
c
und tic hose
bibb at
the southeast corner and Shrubs be added to the roma i.nin
area
•
l' w. \ , I. 1
ur ..L.: .lu.l,..._,, l,. .c... +xx...-.r.._tr: .,+1_,u.wl;,.,.W.. .>`la.a«4.». w:s xl:,>w..-'«uU•7
.....
MINUTES •
Design Review Board
September 14, 1976 a a
`�. Page 4
' Hammes moved and Olson seconded to approve the architectura.1
,
design as specified .
V .
The motion was approved 3 to 0 with Cook abstaining.
y
5 . 2 SDR 34--76 •
A request by Victor See,ber for design review of a pro-
. •
q Y
posed .11. , 000 square foot industrial warehouse at S .'W. } ',
Grant Street and S .W. Tigard Avenue.
•
' '. SITE DLVEL OP 4ENT P LAN
A,. Staff_Report : Read by Daniels . •
B . StI aff Recomt'nendataons
Staff recommends approval with the following conditions:
1 . Al additional 10 Maho lia should be added along the
; back parIkirg lot line,
2 Applicant and staff determine which of the existing
oak trees should be removed. New oak trees 1 - 1. ►'
caliper 8 ' fall shall be `planted in their stead and
additional oak trees be added along the west property
line.
3 . Large shade trees (preferably oak) and shore pine f...,
• should be planted along Grant and ".L'a.gla.rd St . (shown
in red on the plan)
•
4. More deciduous and eve rgxroen shrubs be added to the
landscape buffer .
I
5. A vine maple be added to the center corner planter
on the oast side.sid e
6 . Gravel or �stepping stones n e y e added o a t�nd the hose�
x b
""7 .
at the south east corner and shrubs be ac(led to the
. I remai ping area
Cook moved
m o ve d and Olson seconded nded to approve the proposal with
the staff zeeor l).•ienndata.ons
motion was approved by the unanimous voice vote.
ARCH4.7."TECTURAL REVIEW
a George:
n H co er i er, Construction Services, presented
, , • the
• ar chx 1ec r L ux d 1 with the following ini a x°rriat �o n ,
a building would be sheet :metal, tan with charcoal brown
trim) canopys would be constructed o.f the same material ,
II
I I
. I
• L
w, I
•
Pf �`
I. -
r A,.:.....♦L,.wJ.....J:v .uu,...- R..Alflat.. -..:.IYA Y-EJ ,r,.k `a .-.., .— x. -.. _
MINUTES
ti Design Review Board
September 14, 1975 t a
Page 5
a McMonagle stated he would prefer concrete tilt up to metal .
Cook moiled and Hammes seconded to approve the architectural
design as specified.
The motion was approved 3 to 1 with t h McM na le dissenting. .
,
1 s'
r C, 5 .4 SDR 26-76
\ ' t
1 � Inc. for
review' of ,
A request by Pay less '?v5x t� � n design
a' proposed commercial. shopping center at S .W. Main Street r
and S .W. Sco`± fins street .
A. Staff Report : Read by Daniels. '
o Staff informed the Board that revised plans had been ,
received after the staff reports were out therefore
new recommendations had been written.
• B. Rec ommendations:
�
,ndrt o
n
s
Staff recommends approval with the following conditions
II ..
:., 1 . All landscaped areas surrounding the perimeter of the
•
project should be Planted in such a manner so as to
screen the parking lot from the public "view, 'This
;.....� could be accomplished by the addition of more shrub
• aid/or berms .
2. Areas designated for future expansion should be land-
scaped whe re they abut public roadways . This is parti-
carly important in order to cloarly define the en-
trance drives off" of Main and Scorfins and to screen
the service areas .
• 3 , Vheelbiocks should be added on both sides of the center
parking strip and Perimeter parking,
4 , Additional landscape islands he added in the parking
' areas to provide landscaping '70 ' on center for both
:rows of each parking row and planted to correspond with
other islands: 1
5 , 'Dedication of the a
roa ibetw. en Main and Pacific
should l
d
, �
be a,c� ompI. i sbod In addition, because i t is not feasible
to landscape this area vntil the plans for "Liberty Park"
are completed by the Pa-k Hoard,' the staff' recommends
that the developers be asked to provide minimal site '
improvements for this area in the form of seeding and
irrigation . Additional, L A ndscaping will be provided by
adjoining busa.ncsse� and the public The public share
' will consist partially of federal matching funds already iy
I , q
committed. Staff determines the cost of provldarig' the
developer 's share to be 250 per square Toot, The area
J.
•
, r
., ...t,..., o....__.., ,:�G .� i _ ....._,u M •. ..,M u ,,. i.:„;.e.,t4.w., � f V ..._......,...uie-.„..ti-..4,., ..«�... ,..�.a�,.a.l.ua..,I,..il.w ..r,r�G H.a,.I Nr,.;Q..��,—r
ar"SITE DEV I ELOP ENT PLAN AND DESIGN TiEVIEW .. it), .
Site Plan Review x 4
_ 3�
r.
File No. E = -ft.�
Architectural Review Fee Roce1ved 0 ; --� 1!)'- °N".,..a k,., ''
Receipt
JrT , 1 Date Received $� �? 7 ,- ;
Tigard Planning Corximis,sinn
12420 SW Main St. Tigard_ Or B - _ ..
,. 639-4171
ect Title; ' . ' . .'. .�.,., �`�l t% ' a ...,. Date Filed �d
Pro '
Project 'Address L.6,11c, ___S,.'..".s4.,_ E1
Tax Map No. '-= i °"�,� �' 'yf Tax Lot No �,..! J;,
Owner/Developer
..V
Tele s x ,.t.,. . n.
0wner s ) Telephone e __Za...-,-.1.,,„924
_
Sa.gn,a lure -
r
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
Pr_L(21Dosed Use #Buildings # Units , S Ft.
`� _g.1,.,_
�V ..
- r
i; ”
Site Size r Tot. Sq. Ft. of Buildings �1
wrwr_r.i � b.n.wr �,.
•
Sci Ft. of Paving i :a _ Sq. Ft. of Landscaping 1 f � s ', , ;
Antici gated Development Date ... ,..�.. 9'� - '
. . .,...,.. w.__. ,A,Att, i
Anticipated Development Phases .�...,�.�. �� .r.,�....
, .
Valt.a'l on C _ w
DO NOT WRITE BELOW T HIS LIB .
w�._..��r ..�..,w,..r,,,w,,, . .w.......M.rr.. r r •.. .+.«_-++..M_+ f"""""'.."-r'�.' u..........+.r...r• ��luw a
s Special Conditions - Dedications
Bol.Ldi .g
other'
• . by Date
�nspecti F o
Date °
•
Final
•
'1 ! - , •
...P
1 eta 6/ leg 6ze..
Fa
... . „ ._ ,,,, , r).7? K-) ) ik) O j o 6(0 R ° f ' .. '
P( Re .
•
Akce,vr'. , .. . l,d TD ' >, d, „..,
r
ieoc)(,.41-vt. t.,,) ,...) , \,, .,.
l(�(A,V.A ( 47-OUP '7-..'/"9 )
p .,
1 1 ..... 6.t. .-- ,..),0„,,,,.•,. -- ct,e,,,e pss(, :,,
•
I n
r •
r....'. .i:,'.... .. ,...w .a,.-..,, om, ,,..cu.,«, ,m..u,....w».,M •.,,,., ua,,. .i,d..,.,«w,.� •,,..,
7 ..
�}d
0
,