Loading...
SDR23-76A POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. • . n . 1; ,). 1 1 '1 1,' ,„.w.:.,w 1 Ja Nh.d11,'..,1,',i'.. ,a.•w'144h,:`4,1 rl«.x..U.w,•'.r+.}i.u,'.M-.>,.,„'i'14,1, ',.L,, L ' I S - M H ,H rH .YW4.n%,�A+e ki- J' I{'.'7'•-.tv+v t�7, '.FFh� 4 1741-,-..r. h m.!rW.ti.niHh.l+a.^'{F+ 9k1 1-„n1;/M r.,S,.7t IL - .,,,-h-m ���1 r�.n,e.1�,;+,m'r,w 1`r,w;.+=-� -1 ikP..+nw,1.r:+..�.i..:Wnt�w,,')1�n�iS �'q�,a/•..+�+.M�)Yhtrvr��+rv7;G..y 1 • ,,,..7.,'”'M ^. I'..w w j *•I.. wrwi w -,',!t..„,,',7 r+t 7t' 'rf'hry�y w�,m^ +-{y, f. � l aTRSAL E OSE fi , '� r iH ii � i 1 , v , ', , , , I• � '�r ,; $ t � ) Vela eaf ue ,I(,DR1 Z 76I ; Is ' ` L Cia ie o 72 ' ,..` . ..• ,,.• ,�, .. • . .l,;,. .,...r.',.:,1 .4r1.r :. :..1 ,....., . .,,+•.. ,.:,.,.. ,., ,u.a.wz.'! ti+k.Y 1.,.,,t«wc..,:;t.4.z n.. �1,.+n,«,I.c.i ...' I�'. m � , . . : w y _ • P • • i • , i A • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . 1 ti'• • • • • . 1 • • • • I I I ,, El 0 • r , .„: , ,'',,,,,', ,, '' , ',,,,,',' , , .,, ,,:,,,,' • • • • r 1, '' , 1 «' x.:';. .• d N• .,r-' .,.rl-_.,., ._,*•,.;PI:'.,.-, ',-'H. ...r.,,;b,r-...n..r,u,l.,„-G .d:.>. 4• .w../ {.••4.•,,.„.. ",.r,,,....:,_,'.:.«.T a.a..,._o ,- 1 �.....,,,,•, r .u..rMA.- �_..„..._.t .....r ...... 4,4.x...,.,. -Aa_ .. •Y _ _., r .#,v ru._. u -. v,.n r n. ,yr a au - _++„a; Y .r ,r. r,nu-e„ r,r r Ott. rrtr.. r>, r!, r oxr.-'f+t f i,. , akA✓ u.x,sxa as p(-tairµ,...n.a1 tH*?.rW ir+Vrrr• f,a. rN nwl 1•I • • .... r_„ ,r,.--r. .,_ ..-,.ax, r 1xa., ,ra rn,,."{l^ r 1 M„-, •a.rr.r.t .xa_r„mss Mr. i- r .r.v .,..,nJr=r,a.l,. ,.. nar r'rvp rt,..,.x ,."nu.�.r r..,,.e..ux �,.a �.r.,xe s n,.r r wt,xa sr.a+.•,r-n +,.r er..4.,.f.r n i+ + Q 1 M ; r«.„A,.„aawn•”+n». w'.i arr'.r«in�•nwnd,!±.x=�aPw±r«..mP W rt"mw'NS21rRteawfMr.,M7�n^ / t?Pah'S _. 4au4 i;A,,:"".”vbt i t44,mga4d640 i+r "wt.a a!�v,»7. 4 •- , • rr 11 ' � �q �1i1'l �, - x��'vl ur r 'n r r •n .1, 1 r , * -. ,. ,I i a{�A k_. ya p «; c — —..{ ,n vti ... „rE i r.^ <.n. ..m,., .- v 9,,, 1 u ' q., �� ,•r, �, , I. r .. 1 �, �,1 • r�_ r -.rs,, - it - I ._.�r� .. .I t... 1 • „ - ,r 1. ._ ,,I wa ��, ,r r d r, * 1" r.. n 11 1. - t„- r . 1 �. .� tl l .f� ,..,,.�-. ,, v+wii4hoWSl'p"igpee"^?umrrw ...,. • r i' 1 I ti w . . A.'1 .,. • 1. 1 ,rr . w ° .:-�1 „.. „ .. r A r .,) .. r.l„1, -,r . -„�. , a.,u . ,4. .a,ra•w 1« t�l • jj / orx.a. nr:tMw�GeAwuYdWi+r+w.+w q: • ! 1 r is .Y r ,. , a , 1' • {/: t ,y it s ��,, r ri• ,, ” ' + w,ai l • • M f1yy a . , v ''''s Xwbw” �i' Y' - r 1 �' f u'"4 nr",Y r - t & o�al 9 n .•.. A -. ir,... , . I ', ' ' .! : ,' 4i..4, i.,' '''',,' ,41 C ( ^p+ k ° ,' k • ' • • r .rax ,ra,xlwxs=rr•� epa„w;w,r«a.=:.<xex:;.rrl*'t!^'!`N+IC':.a.. , 'r r�.u° � � 9 ttt' 444, 1 d y M A w+ a 1, . "L wa Xun , I ri 1 , YY' • ` ^11 - ' n r I 'r [vim,,, \ , '# F.'fYrVr'M(9"... MMttfYM +91fFadItM4+IW'IrMllMfgp>I A,y,' r 1 ,, .-r, rli f t e , .-,,II , 1 1 1 1 k e '�”„ may" rr,�;, i , i r" , 1 _ , . r� k�NkYYtrtlM .I r-r { r r r r.r', y . 1 r d to �, Z r r v 1 I 1 i1' -r, I 4, 'i .,,.)...r. ... .,...wr. .r..,4. { �a,r,.., tM v,J.,,.r, „!!r.. .,,, -r......„.yyt.rA • .... ...., r..., �,,, ri. I•,./,. ..,. ., 1 ....,, ..� ... . ...... ...• r.r, .-,.�...,,.k• mw,rtvr tr.r.n .rru.,,Y �,•....:i,�'. veu„vu. , pl(.ipl.V F , h • 1 • 1 A '4 4 V: o MEMORANDUM TO: Bruce Clark FROM Nancy Edwards SUBJECT: Landscape Conformance for National Safety Company DATE: July 11,, 1977 • I Upon Mr. Skourtes k s request : inspected the site on y July 8, 1977 for compliance with Design Review conditions. . The results resultsare as follows: Condition l'#1 - "That the driveway along the west wall be expanded to 12 feet wide. " a Measu rements for the driveway in question vary from 9' 12" to 9' 6" . Condition #2 -"Curbing and ivy ground cover be added around the planting area along the west wall. " o Completed, Condition #3 -, "Three inches of top soil and ivy be added to the western-most planter bed." o Completed Condition #4 - "Ivy ground cover instead of grass be planted in 30' X 40' area on the east side of the building. " o Completed • Condition #5 "Photinia and broom be planted in the front beds no more than 6 feet 0,00 " o Photinia and broom have been planted in the front center two planters. The west front planter is too small for shrub plantings. There are no shrubs in the east front planter where there is sufficient room. Condition #• .nW "A final landscape plan incorporating the ado pted modification be submitted to the Design gn .eview Boardl for their approval." kourtes subtaitted his corrected original from which I have made one copy for the file. Please in fort me if more copies should be made and how condition #6 should be completed, i I • • • MEMORANDUM . TO: Bruce Clark" FROM: Nancy Edwar 'a SUBJECT: Landscape Plan for National Safety Company DATE: June 60 1977 Upon Mrs. Skourtes request I inspected the site on June V • 1977 for compliance with De ig i Review Board conditions. The results are as follows: Condition #1 o That the driveway along the west wall be expanded to 12 feet wide o It does not appear that the driveway was expanded. John Drennan will be measuring it today. I • Condition #2 o Curbing and ivy ground cover be added around the plantingI b area along the west wall O Completed Condition #3 o Three inches of top soil and ivy be added to the western most planter bed o Plugs of dirt and 4 or 5 ivy Plants were added to this area Tha majority of the area is still in base rock Condition #4 O Ivy ground cover instead of grass be planted in the 30 by 40 foot area on the east side of the building o Completed Condition o Photinia and broom be planted in the front beds no more than . 6 feet off center tit straight l all the front beds except for.the easternmost I front bed. No broom has been planted. ;I Condition #6 O A final landscape plan incorporating the al,, opted modifications be submitted to the Design, Review Board for their ap ravai 4 • o plan has been submitted (. 551. m May 27, 1977 John Skourte National Safety Company fox 575 Beaverton, °o� 070J a Oregon Dear Mr. ourtes p Please be g Design Review Board at their re u- of May 24 1977 clarified the following conditions: ,� � � �� lar meeting `,x� ,� 1, That the driveway along the west wall be expanded to 12 feet Curbing ground area along the west wall 3. Three itches of top soil and ivy be added to the western most front planter bed " I 4 Ivy ground cover instead of grass be planted in the 30 by 40 foot area on the east, side of the building 5. Photif,ia and broom he planted in the Trott beds no more than 0 "feet off enter 0 A final landscape lan incorporating the adopted modifications be submitted to the Design Review Board for their approval If I we can be of�� ��� fu.rther assistance, please do not hesitate to contact , me at this office , . . Nancy 'Edwards , Planning As8iotaut p ` , . . 4; v � , 4w 111 1 , IY.: - '," ' • ' `. x �l f.vv r.r,r j ' . tiii:, , iy'1 John Sko F *ftes • .u, May 27, 1977 aA Page 2 ,• I k, Note: `the following acknoWledgcrnsnt must be .received 'bar the City of • Tigard within fourteen (14) days of your receipt of this let- f u,.a; ter, Failure to return this acknowledgement may result it ac. =,. tion by the City of Tigard. , '," "`'''' I hereby ,oknowle .ge this letter documenting the action of the Tigard• Design Review Board» I have receive . and read this letter, and I ' agree to the decision here documented and to abide by any terms and/ or conditions attached. yr • a -t:E+,,c 1 I Signature Date • i w Please be advised that conditional subject to staff approval must be , : ,,,, satisfied prior to issuance of building permits. r i • i ' 11 3''I I s y l . ∎'a 1f .o ' , t ti • r li •a i, ' ?.rr� V e. I, 1 i I - a I , . • II Y. '' ' +. Y Q ., . ._ ,, .. .. _ ,...w,. ,..,, ....•1. ,.. . .. ...,. .,,.... .. .,.1 ,:ii '.'1........,.. .i .1.a aH'.c.:. ......«............ J,.I.wutl'we.nY.,..a..1V V.o._'I.m:w..,....A',1, �, ' ' MINCJTES • TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW May 24, 1977 - 5:30 P.M. i` Tigard City Hall 12420 S.W. Main Street t � Tigard, Oregon ', I> 1. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 5:30 P.M. by Chairman McMonagl.e. 2. ROLL CALL: Present: Cook, McMonagle,' Olson, Goldbach and I' Hammes' Staff: Edwards, Daniels 3, MINUTES The minutes of April 26, 1977 were approved as submitted„ 4. COMMUNICATION: None 5. HEARINGS:�.' 5.1 SDR 23 76 (Skourtes) : Clarification of Design Review Conditions. A. Staff Presentation: • o Read by Edwards B. Applicant 4 s Presentation: John. Skourtes, applicant o Summarized the proposed revisions o Questioned constitutionality of Design Review o Challenged qualifications to staff General discussion about appeal. letter and desirability and amount of landscaping in industrial areas. C. Commission Discussion: The Board decided to take the items of conflict individually ITEM I. (West Side of Building) I I . t . Whether additional ,plant material is necessary in the six foot planting area along the west wall. , Staff Recommendation: tl The applicant has constructed s driveway in this area , because pf this change staff recommends that photini � or a similar shrub be placed six to eight, feet off center along the west wall. (: r s i I i MINUTES TIGARD DEIGN REVIEW May 24, 1977 Page 2 a McMan.agle suggested widening driveway to 12 feet, adding a curb and ivy ground cover © Skourtes agreed Goldbach moved and Olson seconded 'to approve widening the driveway to 12 feet, a curb added around the planter bed, arid ivy ground cover, The motion was approved by a majority voice vote, with Hammes dissenting. Item 2. (Curbing Around Landscape Areas) . .ether curbing should be added around the planting area along the west wall. Staff Recommendation: In order to protect the planting� bed, this recommendation should be retained. Goldbach moved and. Cook seconded to adopt the stall recommendation of curbing. The motion 'day approved by a unanimous voice vote stern Most Front Planter) Whether plant material should be added to the western most p1nt•,e,r abutting the curb cut, Staff Recommendation: That the base rock be replaced with top soil and either, the approved ivy or shrubs acceptable to staff be planted, o Skourtes stated that it was too costly to remove the rock that topsoil could be added. Hammes moved and Olson seconded to add three inches of i , topsoil and to plant ivy in the westernmost f'r'ont planter • bed. The motion :was approved by a unanimous voice vote . 9 .,r,..4, .....,..,.. I..., ., .,,,. '',...,...,,...»,.,. .......:.i.a....,..un-..:.,,,. .„. .. ..IM,.-,a....«...«,.,..,.._,.✓.,...... .,_...„u..,,.......41.r-,.,i.tr......v.,x,.+,.x,,,,"d.,,fi....-,x..«.,:.,!„;,:.{.:.Li,.»... _.4.,._.m...i:ic. ,.:,a....:«,, '.:al......,.tom k • • MINUTES TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW May 24, 1977 Page 3 Item 4. ,(East side of Building) • Whether a 30 by 40 foot section on the east side of the building should be planted in grass. Staff Recommendation That ivy be retained in this area for two reasons: a. having a grass patch in the middle of two areas planted with ivy will further degrade the landscape design of the project b. maintenance will be increased by the natural spread of grass into the ivy groundcover. • a Olson suggested maintaining ivy for uniformity and ease of maintenance. o Skourtes objected Cook moved and. Goidbach seconded to maintain the ivy ground dbver instead of grass in the 30 foot by 40 foot area on the east side of the building. Item 5. (Additional Plantings) Whether additional plant mPltrial shall be added to the front and east side planting aryea,s. Staff Recommendation That additional trees be added to1,11v, east planter bed and " shrubs (broom, photin: a, etc. ) be planted l in the front beds in lieu of trees. Olson and Cook, stated the need f additional shrubs, photinia and broom. a � o C�].s for ” such 5 5 p w-,, o Skourtes objected ) Cook moved and Goldbad h seconded to adopt staff recommendatibm with maximum spacing six feet on center for the broom, and photinia M, The n:ot�.o�, was approved in 'a �' 'voice vote, with Hammes and pp' 3 � Nci onagle dissenting Goldbach moved and Olson seconded to require a final land- scape plan ,.ncorporating the adopted modifications be submitted to the Design Review Board for their approval. The motion was approved by unanimous voice vote. w j, t I .x ' ...a.'• ......,,. ...•.........;,..,.r--•i........ '.11..,,.wa,4..-.A..{I.......a ....,....._......4M.!•-,M..1,..,..: tin.,,;. .,.:.,,.,»...;V w.+....i,a«•.,,.....,.-•;.,,..d.;:.L'1„l°.x.,,./... a«,.awl..,.;I..m,k.x...;;',,..,...•.w..:.. ',.......K..k.r _,a....•....-4....4'4,.,,.+«41:e:.1...N...:a;,44,,m.1:a.a_,4 ..4„o.,,(,..a444,:,,,,....' NhL ,0 1i (,. l''' ''. f p 'MINUTES 7 Tr TIGARD DESIGN 'REVIEW Nayq , 1977 . 'Page 4 • , 6 OTER BUSINESS: . ' There being ' ;a ' further business, the meeting was adjourned at� ?.40 P.M., , illi. 1' F. . I li • • it ii I 1 , b .. ........_.....:.. ........ «t...., ,......,... .,..r...,..._I.,.......u...,....._..,__r,..»..n...«:J._.M..,s.:w..,.k_......_ .-.+tin......C«.,..:.a.....•.s...._..,....::1Ga:, ^t.+i:..,...._.a.....e_,.N...., .+.sir.. ,+;,....:: _...s..-..,.:.DU:A)'..'wttA' .e.:.t_.s.,- - , _ - A F.Yt �.n • • t sxJ 7:J• ..7 .Ir l:..;-r,1.,a -t-N, 1I}7 tI AGENDA 5 . 1 TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD May 24, 1977 5: 30 P.M. Tigard City Hall 12420 S .W. Main Street - Tigard, Oregon • DOCKET: SDR 23-76 • REQUEST: Clarification of Design Review. conditions . W . APPLICANT: National Safety Company / LOCATION: Bonita Road west of S .W. 72nd : Items to be clarified • 1. Whether additional plant material is necessary in the six foot planting area along the west wall August 24th Staff Report , Finding #7: "Landscaping along the west side of the parking area appears to be inadequate . Additional trees, both pop- ' lar' and evergreen, should be added'. " Condition #10 : "That plant materials, size, and variety be subject to staff approval . " Staff Recommendation: The applicant has constructed a driveway in this area p; because of this change staff recommends that photinia or a similar shrub be placed six to eight feet off cen- ' ter along the west wall . 2. Whether curbing should be added around the planting area along the west wall . August 24th Staff Report : Finding #8: "All landscaped areas' should be curbed. where adjacent to parking and driving areas. " ?. Condition #3 : "All landscaped areas be curbed as the abut f' paved areas. " Staff Recommendation �. In order to protect the planting bed, this recommendation should be retained • • } 1 ; J' MN:m:tit,Y,.:•..v-.:F':•'L ",*...:.AU,.`.. a,u.e..:...ul--ts; :.C7Xwu..R,.f:;K1.0...:..;,..:r,t„1.;s.....u-...w'u.+M....•...:.,. M A' • • AGENDA 5 . 1 TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW HOARD ;. . May 24, 1977 5: 30 P.M. Page, 2 ' 3. Whether plant material should be added to the western' most planter -. ' abutting the curb cut . The approved plan specifies ivy for this area. '�iCurrently compacted ' � base rock and one fir tree are` in the planting bed. ' Staff Recommendation: jf That the base rock be , replaced with top soil and either the approved ivy or shrubs acceptable to staff be planted. 4. Whether a 30 by 40 foot section on the east side of the building should be planted in grass. Approved plan: specifies ivy. Staff Recommendation : That ivy be retained in this area for two reasons : a. having a grass patch in the middle of two areas plap ed with ivy will further degrade the landscape design of the • project b. maintenance will be increased by the natural spread of grass into the ivy groundcover. 5 Whether additional plant material shall be added to the front and east side planting areas. See Finding #5, 6, and 7 on August 24, 1976 staff report. Condition#9: "Additional trees be added to the front of the ,f building and ,located so as not to be directly over sanitary sewer lines :I Condition' #10: "That plant material, size, and variety be subject to staff approval . . L. Staff Recornmendation That additional trees be added to the east planter bed and shrubs (broom photinia, etc. ) be planted in the f Y i y�� p � � p front beds in lieu of trees Note : See applicant ' s letter for his recommendation, • • • • • • • ,..�..,.,,.14.,-.-..,�_.,_-...,_., I. ..,....,,.,..,...��......ir,_...,:_i, ........,,:L..war.-.r,.,w,.._.G...,.....,,.•..,.._.._w..a..l+',�„n..,.,,».t..il.;..,.»...��.._•..,....,._.�_, ..ar....+......,,..I.:.J:u.v..,....,,,.«_.......,u.a.._.,.�...n!a,...:.1��.".ii..a...,,,-r...M..._:a,..�.. u....,,.,-»uti....e.,.ti,lt<.s:r.:.�..r.._.,ar<k,.....,C.us,...,.«_a..:e�.��r.�.:,�r��.l.,.ti..,.....:�t,,,-__ • • MEMORANDUM • TO: ' Design Review Board FROM:, Planning Staff DATE: • May 20, 1977 On August 2� g 1976 T he Del s i n Review Board approve • d a proposal for a warehouse on S.W. Bonita and attached, conditions. (see staff report and minutes) • Since the interpretation of these conditions differs between staff and the applicant, the applicant is requesting that the Board review and clarify those areas of disputed Staff would encourage Board Members to inspect the site before the meeting. The site is located on Bonita Road, one lot west of S.W. 72nd. u , II I •; I I • I I I \• I I I I 1 I �� \ n r �: NATIONAL SAFETY CO. , INC. 7530 S . E. Foster Rd. Portland, Orege' May 16, 1977 , Tigard Design Review Board 12420 S . W Main Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Board Members ; , We respectfully ask for a hearing to determine certain 's specifics , concerning the landscaping for a completed warehouse structure located at 7220 S . W. Bonita Road, M-3 zone. , We initially submitted a landscape plan for your review at the time building permit was required. It was the position of your board then • to accept the plan as drawn with final acceptance up to the Tigard " . Planning staff. , The staff has inspected the site on three occasions and continually come back asking for more, We attempted to compromise with the staff, however, Nancy would not change her position. During your hearings, we will have photographs to show you the land- soaping as completed, We ask your approval for the following, , � a, Ivy along the west wall of the building, shrubs would be hit by 20' lengths of pipe, b. 30 x 40 foot section of the east side of building seeded to � grass . East line of property covered with mature trees , They will remain there forever because property is on flood plain land. c.. West corner orner of f property in front of driveway has rock for ��`+ \\* ground cover, 10 x 20 foot strip, together with pine tree. Property adjacent is gravel with dirt. 3 d, Install 2 x 6 treated wood along planting strip west side of build inga pow much landc s alin. is enou15h?,� Remember this is a manufacturing and heavy warehouse zone, (large b5' long trucks ) It is our belief that basic constitional points are at stake. • bincerely A NA IONA, A 'ETX 00, ) IN'O, J hn Skourtes President , ROUGH • SDR 23-76 Skourtes landscape inspection 5-10-77 ^, • I r, The following items need to be completed before landscaping can be finalized: 1. Curbing must be added around the West planter with base rock taken out and top soil and ivy added. m • 2m The east planting area need the addition of more trees ( 3 or 4 Maple or oak 7-8° tall) and the ivy ground'cover continued. If a dumpster is to be added to this area a plan must { be • ± submitted speciffing the location and, the proposed s c re eni'ng �. Curbing must be added around the planter along the west, wall of bid. and shrubs added 4. 20 parking spaces are required for I the site. These spaces .• . I must be strippEdimed in and any location changes shown on the plan • V I .`j rV/J ///, A.�A / 4° Y A w. N xa+ I'I I . • I r V I`r I £ I • • • «-*-.. ....,. ,.. .,Ii .... ....,....................i..r.»..,,......1_ ..-J.4i.....«. 0........,«.... .......I..t.l..,M........,..+.«.,s.....,._.........,^...,..... _,...+.....n,.. .. +.4..-..._ . .Yh..w.. .+1-... .. 4.-. ,.« m n 1 TIGARD ' CITY OF TIGARD _cei „ .. PNS11p 1p X110 t1 bS ^ SFE 2� '1• til' Box 3557 P. O. X30 1j,�6 12420 S. W. Main CITY (�r l; Tigard, Oregon 97223 °CARD August 27, 1976 • • John Skourtes National Safety Company 7530 S .E. Foster Road ;I Portland, Oregon 97206 Dear Mr. Skourtes: Please be advised that the Tigard Design Review Board at • their regular meeting of August 24, 1976, approved your request for site development and architecture of a proposed 20,000 square foot industrial warehouse. This approval is subject to satisfying the following conditions : a "' 1 . The asphalt driveway and parking areas be built to city code. • 2 , An equal amount of evergreen trees be added to the landscape areas. 3. All landscape areas be curbed as they abutt paved areas. 4. The ivy groundcover be Baltic type . 5 . No fill he allowed in flood plain 6 . A drainage retention system be developed and approved by City Engineering Department. 7. The non-remonstrance agreement required for the recent minor land partitioning be executed prior to the a. issuance of any building permit agreeing not to re monstrate against future street improvements to SW Bonita Road. 8. Access permits for the thr ee access points be acquired , by Washington County Public Works. • ' 9 . Additional trees be added to the front of the bu ilding and located so as not to be directly over sanitary 1 ' sewer lines and 10. That plant materials size and variety be subje • � ct to staff approval . If we can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact this office, 639-41711 1 I I ' I 1 Y V tP 1 t77 ! ♦ ... , .,... . .., .,.i.. .i;t.,,i,., ., , ...i.',. xiv. a'...r.,,...r.,... . ..,...,,.e ,._ .r. n.,.ewiii F.xn i, ...,v.r .ruwl .It.u. n.l y5....,l t.,.?k, ._ .... ,. .i't",L,r....0 .., ......, .,r•. . x., , tr I. r b r 4 1 C ♦ 4 I • • �w,..+...uxr L.. .r...• ...,,..,. ,.� ,.,,, �, ... .. _,. v_ .rry ,,.a. - t. c..al�..a..rti,...+LLtL.C:.r IL....•...L.t,�M,..;1dJ:. .x.,J rv.. rlµ. . 'WV. x.L,t.a.:-....'i.-....w niL+N"d',i::l»4:1,.'.L:4;;.N,t.J 41i.......fr,a.,. .:r0•..tu.sa,.: 1 I ...,...J:n Sa:A.a..,.:WJiM"Nci rr..r.}_ wT i National Safety Company . Page 2 Sincerely, Richard Daniels Associate Planner RD: s f r I ,r. Note: The following acknowledgment must be received by the City of Tigard within fourteen (14) days of your receipt of this letter. Failure to return this acJ.now- . ledgment may result in action by the City of Tigard. 1 • hereby acknowledge this letter documenting the action of the Tigard Design Review Board. I have received and read this letter and r agree to the decision here documented and to abide by any terms and/or conditions attached ei natur • g date • • i I i I i 1 i I I r�.,,,..,., ...••� •..i,r'.I„. i,.•............. ..... ., ..,..,,•.., .,......r.....•rw.�L•.n.r.M1. .eh•,n„nL. rn nr,.•x.,,r n ..,e„ r ..,•.. .r....L.n„rL„..w.,,l,,, ..r.,e.•, ,n..•..,,w.,nrw n. s.•, •,., ..r.. ,r i PI Aw L ' A t L • 1 t .• v April 259 $7 I r r cJ l Sko! t Y Orklaort, 97206 Aet Land$0ape " , <x tor Natioaal Satety Dear 11,7r. $kourteso on AG $ a t 24$ 19 6''$ the D w l rrG V i Board a tta ah A the ,. following oorlditioris to tbe laadsaapo plat for your waro- , house on S.W. Daaitat, 1. equal amount of everareela trees be dd to the lands00$104 2. All landsoapo area$ bo ourbed w4oro 1' o; ' bu` t paved ar 30 The Ivy eroundoover be Baltic, Hypo. 4. Additiomal tr000 added to h front X the building o not to be dlreotly over the sh, %itary glower 111164. That p t rat? i o 'M9'AiM4 artfriGtµ1" 1) . SU11400t to otatt off. proval tho Dosign Pau the applioaat MT ,all PreP4re Thal plans .n rp or '' 4 . 411 asPo0ts off` the Dooio.. Roviow Ply $110provol aad tile four copies l ,' aoy ne000mary documerits wIth the Plotting iro , Board oeriditions tits bee4 re0eivia4. This oho r ��1 I som o e , t p r .4d will be b : Mme!' F laF+ak' 'atla +i' + +NN'167 •,'e 7FR'if.ott G4pIn 19iIN tiW ttiNn . F "b+' HTnYf".r.''".'' F t '''' '''''':'' .',, '''''''' '' ': :' ''''',' '' ' '' ' '' ' .. . n. � i �. [,,.,r. . ,i .� _.•+.1� !� i ,.. ...,.,�M i'.0 :a�� r,�... .x141',: J.. t' '1�.,. I,l e1. r _. .. ..w.t .. A.�',„ ju �o� b de r .' T is 'final ,plan could be drams to noels .. ' . y l ry Y f44 following' ry o * Vn : plant o/ pt1 number size idY " p Sinoe Ithi,o tlan I subject tO staff a , ro ai X would z e L4 th ± your landooape desigue ' th m ei meet 4. to disoUsS this proaeoto. 3i Y. • tor a� I; . } J4 • i1 T'r l,r } I • 'I • • t . .4 • • • STAFF REPORT PORT Agenda 5 .4 Tigard Site Development Plan and Architectural Design Review Board August 24, 19'76 - 5 :00 P.M. >r General Telephone Building , 12460 SW Main St. , Tigard, Oregon DOCKET: SDR 23-76 REQUEST: Site development review of a proposed 20, 000 `square foot industrial warehouse . LOCATION: Bonita Rd. west of SW 72nd h ash. Co.. Tax 'Tula 2 p 51. 12A • tax lot 1900 ' APPLICANT: National Safety Company BASIC FACTS : 1 . Site is designated general industrial on Tigard Community n uni • y Plan and zoned M-3 (Light Industrial) . 2. The Tigard Community Plan designatrkSW Bonita Road as a collector. street . 3. The existing site is presently vacant with, overgrown native vegetation. 4 . The surrounding' land use is flood plain to the south, vacant to the east, existing industrial building with General Chain Company on the west and Sabre Construction Company on the north. 5, The surrounding zoning is M-3 Industrial . FINDINGS • o t 1 . Section 18 .12 .100 requires 30 ' additional center line set_' back from SW Bonita Road. The right away width of Bonita Road is 40 ' . An additional 10 ' is to be provided through the partitioning. 2. The applicant has proposed a general industrial building with no particular occupant secured as tenant . Any use of the building would be subject to the permitted and conditional uses allowed in the M-3 zone and any, use would ww,:w.0,tire approval prova 1 by the Planning Commission , szon . 3. The site plan as proposed satisfies all setback and height limitation requirements of the code. 4 . Suction 18 . 60 . 120 requires, that for general industrial ,,. buildings one space for, ,each employee on the largest shift or one space for each 1000 square feet whichever is Larger. Without knowing the occupant of the building the one space for 1000, square feet should be adhered to . The size of the proposed building is 20 j 000 square feet thus requiring 20 • ■ Nt . i • _._.....,,.,..,..•......., ,, S TArFF REPORT ( 1 Agenda 5 .4 Design Review Board , 24 I • . August 1976 page parking spaces . Twenty spaces are shovel on the site plan,. 5. Section 18 . 58 . 080 of the Tigard. Municipal Code requires' Ithat the front 20 ' of the property be landscaped. The site . plan shows two landscaped islands. Poplar trees are shown. to be located, on the site. These appear to be adequate on the east area but i by themselves would be inadequate' and the addition of evergreens such as a shore pine would pro- vide screening during the winter months . 6 . Ivy is shown as groundcover but no particular type is • • shown . A hardy ivy such as Baltic would be appropriate on ' • the site . Changing the tree type to a maple or an oak adjacent to the building would provide a better shade screen for the parking area next to the building. tr ; 7, Landscaping along the west side of the parking area appears to be inadequate .. Additional trees, both poplar and ever- green, should be added. No groundcover is shown . A con. � tinuation of the groundcover along the front should be placed in this area. • \ 8. All landscaped areas should be curbed where adjacent to parking and driving areas \, 9 . Section 18 . 58 . 080 (2) Tigard Municipal Code requires that xl all areas not occupied by paved roadways, structures, or , . walkways s should be landscaped. The areas to the rear of y . the building are shown for natural vegetation. This should . be supplemented by the addition of moisture tolerant trees • (Red Maple, alder or willow) and other vegetation to • stabilize the bank area of the flood plain or grass. '1 . , \ 10 . The site plan shows two catch basins with drainage directly into the flood plain . It should be noted that during last winter a year of light rainfall the intersection of Bonita Road and 72nd was fl.ooded. A drainage retention system • 1 should be developed, 11 . Section 1 8 . 58 >090 requires all utility lines be placed underground. 12, SA. Bonita Road is county roads Access permits are required for all new entrances on to the right-of--way." RECOMMENDATION: "1,,proval with the following conditions 1. The asphalt driveway and ��parking areas be built to city code, . 0 . n ..._.., M.,».......,......»u_.,......„ 'w;.'..«..k.;..r,.,.,..G.«,..,_,,...,....a.:....M.......„..,...,.,,,....,.w....«.....e.e.,..a,..`.,,a.a.',.—.-,. ...._.a.».,,:k-1.o-_r,.,«,.:a:sac...,..:.,.rw.:...•.rL,tw_....i i a.:zraxa..c..a-..ui....a✓:as7v,:,.tt,a:.r''a-. .-k..,> STAFF REPORT Agenda 5.4 Design Review Board August 24, 1976 Page .3 2. Axe equal amount of evergreen trees be added to the landscape areas. 3. All landscape areas be curbed as they abutt paved areas . 4 . The ivy groundcover be Baltic type. 5, No fill be allowed in flood plain. 6. A drainage retention 'system be developed and approved by -' City Engineering Department , 7. A non remonstrance agreement be executed prior to the issuance of building permit agreeing not to remonstrate against future street improvements to SW Bonita Road. 8 . Access permits for the three access points be acquired by Washington. County Public Works . • 9. Additional trees b r added ddcd to the front of the building and located so ,.s not to be directly over sanitary sewer , lines.s. • i ,Px• w 1- M: G � National. Safety Company ,'► P , ,r - .. 7530 S.L. Foster Rd. '�, O4 1. 4;11 s, ,�( Portland, Oregon 97206 Tq� - August 31. p;7§OF t k ,,,:•n.; aiwY> F 1 4µ""N V Tigard Planning Commission Members r 12420 S.W. I , 96 /4J11 76 Main tract [` ,7 �- t 1� Tigard, Oregon 97223 *MAR%ITY GA � Gentlemen: This is a follow-up to our request that the future lot street dedi- cation come out of the 20' 'planting islands. Why is this required? , 1. Unique parcel of land - not flat- triangtl.ar in shape - flood plain in back. 2. Initially your planning department personnel told us to trade off 101 road dedication from 201 landscaping strip. They unilaterally changed ground rules and are now asking minor land petitions to dedicate 101 after they had verbally told us to file a variance for the trade off. (See our letter to your commission dated July 28, 1976.) Copy enclosed, 3. This is a multi--purpose warehouse building which will have up to four different tenants, 4. Company that will ultimately loan the monies on that build ing have instructed us to face the front of the building tom ward the road. Why would you build a building sideways when you have 260' of road frontage? wilding set-backs are more than your code requires set-back is 70 feet. 5. Building was designed per plans to allow for fenced and, screen- ed storage behind the structure. An addition to the struct- ure can be added on the south side without distorting the symmetries of the Site 6. Fudeve loped paroels within 100° o f this property rty eithe' r P have no landscape strip or currently have a 101 landscape strip before any road dedication. Question: Will the two planting strips be 20 50 or 30 It,'50 t . This request at best is most modest. Sincerely, y,,,„1 4„ t'.. I i John R. Skaurtes President JRS , I enclosure . _ .,.. w,. ..,,,., _ a.,a,., ,t, ...... ,.....« .,._..-vnr,..f._•x......,.....na::a...,............n.•.,.C,n...n'".=t+1,..�,.a.A.....,.1 ..,...:t..-.,, u....<1h•.ndf'.... .m�.....�.1. :-,.........,..:7r-..«u.l ... .-+'.�.,".•JUtru,k...,...rrcµa,Y4:.C«'fa..h.,M...F.,.,..a.;,..,',+.�..a ASe.,,t,r., e� -. ..w�u»::siro.. r • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING ( STATE OF OREGON County of Washington ss City of Tigard I, Sandra L. Fite , being first duly sworn, on oath • A depose and say: That Z am Secretary for the Planning Department for the City of Tigard, Oregon. That I served notice of hearing of the Tigard , Planning Commission of which the attached is a copy (Marked Exhibit A) upon . each of the following named persons on the 1/ .. day of �� .�x _� , , l97_�.., by mailing to eacha them at { the addx-iess-4sho �z on the attached list (Marked Exhibit B) , said notice as hereto attached, deposited in the United States , ., Mail on the q , day of : a ' r , 197 �. , postage prepaid. • Subscribed and sworn to before me on this day of cyt 1916 14?‘girhV�6b9�l9�/U-����jy� ,"'•'�y '4 1�1 �'. 6��a'Uf�a fd Mii ' 'Qs'�) s�i^'�i' '✓'l.+'0J r 6r''fj 1jF 4, ° ,o i;r ia} 1 �, :1�w r i ar".a 4 �8{a •a f ik''hi.{.1 (.,: hh ��a, +t��s{ #,•,r1• a▪ � Adrvy) y Publid of Oregon '4 as 1.1t�t„,„.' ��P•y��rn J ' �bY� �•i�t Sr�a'�"{f apl��ranl�i�'ty6> �J"�aw�i-,flii� { 1' ;fi,x;,,p 11a m„{tF',;e`onna 5 s i o n expires: ...,,..x.w�...+«..4:,.,.r.1.. i9J..+.,.�«i 'i 1 ' • , , .-''•.,., .,a ,.- w ,w.a ,.¢. k;b .u.u1,. Jf......,t„x 4.. ,_a :4-“-!--- ' a,.'w.--'4-'....•...,.''''-'7.. I»ta'µ'''', ,--.''.:.t . , - , ... 4'.',.i4www,tp.rh. { k,I, 4 I.”, q Jul 15, 197 ; I , �d a kou.w+' e , '1 I ' 5 30 S a F.' Poster Road • Portland, Oregon 97 08 Re.t . SD 23 7 sear Mr,�I1 Skourt es o ' t • This is to inform on July 13 1978 the Deli. n ;. r---- .:-.. 'H .,.,. •• Review' Board denied your recuest for a site de..1re1opment ' 1 , re ie for the following reasons;. C• ' i »» an illegal minor lan partition '• ,J� y�py p y�y�« �y a�"y��y �/y r�7 �yYyyy� y�a„rq ,. y i y�y dry �y.'�y �1.�. y ' ' 2 a inadequaNe fsi N•1e in�i•O ,ma7 ion 3o A,d1,."�ernin,'g exis{pin, ' 'P , goo tours, roposed` cQntour$a, cross sections,, anti- ' 1 ' t exact, '�,00d p1ai 1ogaation,. I ' Enclosed is an app11eai iQn for .a minor land;'partition, , please contact Rick paniels, City of Tigard, Planning, Depart I , mont if you bare any• ques t ion6. ' ' '• S i�yryy��n �y �„ JLJ�*wa�4 �J.Ah �1 NaAy Edwards '' . . Plannin 'Department , ' '• . Eno1osur r I 1 ¢ f r 1 �t I I I • I Ij rt� , ..,. ..."e�:, a_ ., ... ,:a•..:4..'.a.l�.,_,. .,..,.:ox,-c..W..:„.a__.....,, "..:a..M._1__,...,...._ ... .,ae................,...�i..,,.....:,�tr.,.......,....r..«,.__.,.r. .,,.i.tl:..n:.'...,a.a.:r.....,L.,a_.a�.,,«I...«,»a..,....-,.......«"rw...,,,,w.:..C�..a..:.i,.....;i....._....w.,:r,.1G.«.s,,«,5.,...P:.......:;7.'�..:,.,........k+:ed:.,.,- SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN k ) DESIGN REVIEW • r -) Site Plan Review File No 5'f , Architectural Review Fee Received C'� , n.ca . , f APPLICATION Receipt # /q3,/ _,... . Date Received Tigard Planning Commission � 13 r 12 420 SW Main St. , Tigard, Or. 9 223 r.-, 639-4171 , I Project Title fAetC/. ..1,16' (2_,,. _Date Filed z/ /7 Project Address 60fruA n040 . I Tax Map No. Tax Lot No. Owner/Developer 1/11 Sh ' a') Address s - Telephone�' � Tel Only 2-3 Y 73 3 1 • Owner's fi ' Telephone µ . .. ,� . Si nature.. .— r DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY uiidin s Units S k±'•i;.. �.x o„���� Use --- #�3 �; �� ..�,,.......�.�.:� („4/4,R6-,,e!ti L t /o O jc> 'Z c t7 -,, /J/ Site Size .-rwo Tot, Sq. Ft. of Buildings .c 0t.") Sq. Ft. of Paving to oo p Sq. Ft. of Landscaping; 2- 0 u, Anticipated Development Date � � • Anticipated Development Phases . Valuation I I DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS UNE Special Conditions - Dedications Bonding Other Final Inspection bill Date w � � b 1 I I i I it s � r _ rb.lar4 rW+YIYr Y 1.14.1 Y °� . .Y N • r....» .A«,...«.r...-.rld...,.r.w_l.+?V.l. .-.N.. n.,.x.,.+u...s.,o.,l.,,.,.uw,-.14..Y.%�.r..lw.w�-ir.A JrI.•i..1::<x.:k:,;C,r,rw,,:.4.,«...- .-«n,.:swF.-4W.».:4Wt+CAl,l.w...,vH.o.S..i.-WA..F+.t.:�u..u.:r.,»JIuA�h.1,VA.:ku;J•.d..«....Y.N.FC&..b1M�.rn n ..+,' 7! . i . �' ,`J '��,� 777 YIVI� I', . .F � r- c?'. 2 „,. , „ ' SI'l(Ot U,,R.,\--'' ...c ,' '. '-.0.‹.w C-7...w Ary . . ( 57, ,. ,, - f F I r � ; � r r Gi . � ,,. . � T. , . . i . j' E., )i i,. Y 1 i f i I .\ . e i 11 1' 4 . . „ I ww�`b11"' ,...MYMNMWWw1WM.....n11LMM�W ppY Mr.o..;....r.s..dv.m.orwo WIM�IV IMYMY.FfM,...0 4YwUWIM,M1WWgMMA4...0.WMM4..,..M.M'W MWIM4.fYhA;Ml......• {.%11.1gWNMiT:*✓✓MMA,.f'WF.11,4 aFVKMli....y.•.H ,- ..„ w, w r `'wi. C �, M•+ W 4 k u n ,rte ,t . ill: 6 .IL's.•%=by„NG,r.,'rwa �' r ' .:j h w� (41 , �} + r 4 (:. ' HMO .� LY, 1 ,,y � r 1 Yd'•Ppl:1 1 MK' i '1 1 r m wN t 'pay 1, 1 I.us ro...1.F ...11:....w q.wwwki+ y...44.•41mY.E..H1s1uW.IWdtMw. •11WIYp�WMM �K1I .bH iNMibJl Mwu1a.M:Y¢wroNWW.p4r4a �. u,.., -,..i .�. 1f . 1 5 �{I I 1,'',L' I 11 �a �. 1 r 4' I u • °6fr k(.wr ' 1 1 ....Y err ..r. ■r ....n r. ,. ■ 1 A it N, rw f„I' / „, u 4 1' ,rfi,'r 1 1 —::91r;"..,,1 0 1 \i,,..., (J of ,p /.R ---,r,r,.., :. 4 ' it • H/i ! 6 ! a l x i t t r �, - fir,. ,/' i'u , ry, 1 1..Irlrtlrrn .... !l R E 1,t"„I'�, / ..i. _ ........ � to, ---------+ , \: : i'l I Ilk 9 1.,' .a.... i \ \\\i:s ,olli 4 (.......r_..../ ' 1 I ri,,,, * , ,.•1;___:________,...--'''''''''''---. .,;-1".--'-‘----:___,...—,:r.”: ''''....\,.. I � 1, ., , rr" r, •'i'.'^",—» .yA `��t,'t 7n 1, \ti a✓rr,J"' �' y‘ ,,": ...,,,....„..,....„' f."--,7—.-'''''''''',4".f, I\ \, , \% ,A • r' , �,�+y,Jy/ I 1 ,�i e.�,+nMMMMM''���''-''���-���. f/ t ,,—.t„ • ,...r.wr*,�4„rY t' „i S( '''.,P�..r•!•^,,.,..�,.r ate',,..„0-' + �'�+ M''' i+'"�, 1 \, 6 T+/ 1. 1 ,.....;,...;'f',7;' ..'�..,r 1 1° .I r " (-; , �� .' ' f y.. wr e.,' wry ��. r� , 1 q■ %,,,,o...," '..b.'' N""); ( ;:, .,„.'' /,".:,;/ •ir)'-',,;...,-.. ,,,".:.,,,i'' ) \. \ I:, ,.._,,,..>), f p ..J • A:,...%1 ,,,',-'. ,lit4/ '"--. 'Y'' //. ' /V __...-/-- L i \\)0 Ake, /,,,,;":..'-e'•.— -..''' ,,--?-_,...._,..,,,,t--._ ....,;', . ..,,,,,-- ' T'l .' \ ‘,1 .1 ,:._..1 ei Ili, , ,i,.,:,.-'" kfi. ...-: —1,....--1---..z.s...:::::,.).....-- \ - \''A '- ,:,.*7.t'.":',..:'"..,•1I'1 I 1 / i w //Fr ' ,),( .1":„.9,:"?---,,.,S) . S-.1.t7 i X r 1 r )1\'''-''' '''1 . •,, ,........N , *t ----------*f f i ' ^"y J I/�✓ �! �f ,.r s.:Jr ti \\,',\A\ L 1 1�y . ...--r JI l� /� / "! �-,^—r--. . , ,,. , , kit'.... , ‘' , 'L�,p�' I.' 1��,•t � r't"♦ ;i.� 'I .`'...n,,. tmwum�i.a+awu ,' '1,i..y* ��.,tt 8 ill.. ,ek.. -:// ' ' i / ,,, 1 ! I 4A * Ir mss, � ` .1 .� Yr(, 1„ Lit ..-- --�.- 4,\ .f19iw .*rte-,.�""' ' : y)1 F"I 1 / \\\,:;4,.-4 *'\'' ' jjk \* _ / alucszti'.w..rar.an ...rw.¢r,rm,..,r,q•.pp, r ti + 't.+. Yr�crat .,.'SCIµw..�.•�-w,:.�:�.t.... !W _"..�+o�......� ..,,,,,,,,,. -'h1��^'�P—^---"---"a- a alm......,n "'-.r"'-'-.--...-.- %y 1rl- 1 p er,^' ._ — 7."" ,." ..... ," , /,' Z,,- ; 1 . $ --(:).- ; - ' . . . r r.. ,v. fin. 1 • i.a ."-wow.[.-.a•a.. Q 1Q4 N 0 to 4„1'7.4c, , v Q^ . lQ0--A2 0 0 � a� sx o m _ AL --- . bE S.9 589°,19'E 4s8 4” . 4..50Aci 240 7 r— I45'. ' , ., .._., / :" . ' -r,,,,,,it „,t,,,„) Z,•,:•:`, ' ' i ‘ t^,S. 6195 to I 0-8 1.04 Ac. Ns Lt.� :,, V, y 4f X86° 9*W i w�ST' 7 3t.4` f 589°2!'W 2 30. N 89°Q6'3p 5w$i�' x.._....,,_._.,,23 D'1 ��_� _ _ .. -------- r�tr�lt�^ n ,�. nrC� ^i o' `. y;,. _�, I30 N I 1 !� 7-,4,a BEGIN C R 736-=:':-.--)...'-t 7 ERM.'C R 638 t'�0H D•1 i ....,r.. 250 . .ctr.Z" c�.c'x'�:.r4a:11:z >n,.r ”or:-....4.44;,141,..m.,....4444, •i tr. ,„.._._...._....,,__ ,__......._ 31165 �,., � 454.8 fz5 // , , 1 0 1941 � 20401 ' I .804 ; �� I �C4PAG �. 1 w= d \I9OHAI/.014c, _ 3,i. A e. • "1 ��., r ?300-1,, 11 ::.j ` �O � t7� �. r.4 CSI rrsa 205' :r f 904 tC 5 ho.112151" f I . I f ' 4W , 7.6TAc. ? 4 . ? / 4.". ; ".4 • � 0. \\ ,, . . . SUBJECt SITE ' �r I- � _ 7 .. ': I1 e y 111:3 �"ti! �. ; f 0„......: 1 3.tJDAt. . • . • ' --1- . tu=C i.71�,J f //C//Jffrr` riY„ . ` / r 'r/J,, ,, . .r. .Y(:9Jn"'S^,7t Y;?'^ ✓':.::, .. '-1 . 4] '�A8:t,..rr.. ..r .J/jt.w/r r . fi i]!/l',53,1',:w x.r,rra+."urr" "-,rriJ.:'":.T r'.,"s($'+ i u.`r27. I�,�r1.+:«1r+r 7r,k”Ja iy' r.va,_/..«t. . A a r. . r � . 1800 G14y ,..-t.�,cet:� l,2fAc„ , . Z F l > N .4 264' IT- EAST....254' ,'ct' .4` r 8 i O ar r, 4 A c,,\,, 54 ....._ ,..._ _.._ ...,._ � � ' � \'''' .�'�Ac, � ���;� � rx- � � �ItC SiiJo.1'127 7) j n► _. 233,255' . as c, 1•2-r.:-...-......74.7.1..'_.... ._.__ ....w_. .4' 1 64+ *,„--, L�"r,~ u„.;'''.J`r 264`1* -' "- . I �. ra . � . -^ ` � ..x«. 1 i,... l'' ; o 2 200 .+25:Ct t. 264 64' `" j, .9aAc. (C S.No011216 r FAH , .�. 1704 �, . .. .__. N,'1y10 z rMa. 2 3170? , CS 15002 W '1 \ti:,J;r�,�,'s..'",.+:/Jf .,J,.,,..rJ / J �/,r,,aJa/, Yyl,.. • Jt�. x �"" � Si 7 >'..:::r::.i!/i ir'r'Giif:+, �;+rlr i/i/iFf�i%�t"r�rit/j;.+r"rJ/.%�✓.:"�3r./'`�'vI'�Y x) i 2 2 rr . .�,.w_-... P ... 5 32 Rbdt . CS ` �Q Y i� r, y j �'' .* t. .._.mow �-M ,� =r=;� k 3,0 204 0 ' .w.,,J c...�''. t .5i'\ 2400 w �'.,gip.. ��yLw._ _ �. r`. tI6,20' o. �c. 1 � , � 1 1600 1 2500 (� 17 �; i Ac. Ta+ 1 i p 4 4� � " ,..' _r C;5. 1 3002 o „,.• �> ..,� .,r , ,.,� �. .f,4, W ,,,,� .y,,f. ��i.,>rLr✓,ri., �.IJl�.ril/ 'rri 1 err, {'•�./.r, .w «.� oY' 2,3 t rti t .:�1'l� �:ri iI; �.�Ai%� J, fiS"/lii Ji.r../.w�,:r/lri7%I��:�/J.iSre'.ir. /rrrfl/,L/i+.i. TR1L\ç1s ilk �y ,t� 'w]r�. I ` I� 1 nw„ w"M"`4 lC".".,, r+4*'"."p� '.�'�'yy, ,.w .f t I. ' s'�wW+w'.,«..�i.,'...w..,�.:.:".+..:ui."�'++.:, ".....w'�..; '.�».,r«."",�.,..K' 0 i, .,.... 4.,. a ': , . 1