SDR22-76 POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
,-IiFF a;Fk....t,,.'.k,}»�-,.a.kr.a«.. M,b�,.r,«M,:.,aM._,•3x�.,..:wik..K,x,.,5."Ml.r..:al+.ri?wd,,..ira..kx.wr..,�,i:,.,:ii«r 1
•
•
�,a•m:,;..r+�. �
' LEND � ;
s,a. ere .o rn (�SDR 22 76})
9 8(}:'SW 'T4dra S€ree
i:' � a r 4�' �'nl...«,....�.wl,,,n»«m�..a+[-l.wvw,.'x r*-,-+4.•dMra...-t; a w..Yin..�,r„sa.,6, i''.
''i: 1n•r-f •
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
• •
I I i I r
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
a ,
I I �
. ' r
ni e
r7
•y
•
•
•
•
•
1
•
•
•
•
•
•
r '
I•
•
d r `
• ..,..... :,, ., .»_.�. .. 'a...,.. ..,____,-..-:..«..«...w» .i:-,....'..,.,.,,,_.»._.a.....: :..,t,.:.,r...« .n..,c;.......t. .> »I..w,..w ....,. ...,�.,...>....,.-,aw.A:u.'.....4.t,..'aw...a»...>.,.. ,,....... »,.,,.» ..t,., .. ,.. ..,,... ._,.... ,. ..,r ,
CITY OF TIGARD
, m
' d1A11
P. 0. Box 23557
12420 S. W. Main
.. Tigard, Oregon 97223
October 1, 1976 � OCT 1976
M
yIN�
D�
ATLAS STEEL,
. 1
• �2) L . CO
• , ;
Atlas Land Company .ar.
r wu„iy
r
9380 S .W. Tigard Avenue
Tigard, Oregon 97223
0
Dear Sir:
q 4
Please be advised that the Tigard Design Review Board at their
regular meeting of September 28, 1976, approved your request
for review of a revised site plan and architectural design of
an industrial building at 9350 S .W. Tigard Street , This approval
is subject to satisfying the following conditions:
1 . Either across easement agreement be recorded assuring
joint use of the access drive or the two lots be com-
,�, biped to form one tax lot .
2 . Landscaping along the front of the building be con-
tinued up to the building.
•
3. Tam Juniper be planted 4 ' on center.
4 . The landscape islands be curbed.
5. 6" wheel blocks be provided for all parking stalls.
6 . The signing program consist of a 32 sq. ft directory
sign with wall mounted identification signs not to
exceed 12 sq. ft , and be subject to Design Review
Board approval .
7. Irrigation plan be Submitted to staff for approval .
8 . All utilities serving the site be placed .underground.
9 . A 50 ' greenway easement across the flood plain be
" • grant ed for g r eenway purposes, with parking improvements
and building shown on the approved site I I
' plan, exempt ,
from the greenway easement
prior to issuance of building permit applicant must ) submit
evid:.ice that the fill area is above 100 year flood plain. If '
we can be of any further assistance please do not hesitate to
I I
I I
ri
I f
I l I{
,. , .. .., .. Jh:'M,I l I VAN n.f Y wW.k. , u a,xW l M.d 1.,a A.•...aw,4.'x.u ..
•
.. ,..... w, , , ,.. .., .,, ., +.,13, .. ,Y. ..1,.. ,. _ _ ..d'✓1.,»I.,. ,I. 1..{' k.,.Y.-. 1. .al.'" .4'tI)Y'iYA°i
•
call me at this office.
Sincerely,
• Y'', �n+�^"'"�unl+,.,,;;.rr..�; .+.*q-r •
Richard Daniels
Associate Planner
RD: sf
Note:
The following acknowledgement must be received by the
City of Tigard within fourteen (14) days of your receipt
of this letter. Failure to return this acknowledgement
may result in action by the City of Tigard.
I hereby acknowledge this letter documenting the action of the
Tigard Design Review Board. Z have received and read this letter f.
and I agree to the decision here documented and to abide by any
terms and/or conditions attached.
Signature r
/42-fir
Date
Y
•
• •
' v _ ', -,.. t, ., a, .,�...n•.,., ..,":7..., ,..,..,....w-.u,....«-..+w ..,.+» ......».... I. ::I• w «.,...,_.,:.1.....�.•.».1,...,w..,...r,.a...,...l a,..... .,•.nl:,iw'..,.._,_.,...._e. a•». .. ............_,...A...•, ....w...._..ar.....i,».M G.V,...A.,.....ti,. •
II
STAFF REPORT
Agenda 5 . 1
Tigard Site Development Plan and Architectural Design Review Board 1, „
• September 28, 1976 5: 00 P.M.
General Telephone 12460 S .W . Main Street
•
DOCKET: 22-76
SDR 227
REQUEST: To add 5, 000 square feet to an industrial building approved !('
by Design Review Board on 7/13/76 .
��` LOCATION: 9380 S.W. Tigard Avenue
• APPLICANT: Atlas Land Company
I . BASIC FACTS
1 . The site is designated "General Industrial" on the Neighborhood
• Plan II and zoned, M-4, Industrial Park.
•,
2. A development proposal for a 14, 800 square foot industrial
building was approved by the Design Review Board on 7/13/76
with the following conditions:
1 . Either a cross easement agreement be recorded assuring
joint use of the access drive or the two lots be combined '
to form one tax lot .
2 Landscaping building
L n scaping along the front of the buildi be continued
' up to the building.
3. Tam Juniper be planted 4 ' on center.
4 . The landscape islands be curbed.
6 .
5. 6" wheelblocks be provided for all'parking stalls . ,
6 . The signing program consist of a 32 ' directory sign with
wall mounted identification signs not to exceed 12'
7: Irrigation plan be submitted to staff for approval .
8 . All utilities serving the site be placed underground.
9 A 501 greenway easement across the flood plain be granted
with the improvements e
• ., �aar�k�_i�g improvoments shown' �on ��tl��. approved. site
plan exempt from the greenway easement
I.I . FINDINGS
•� 1 . The Fanno Creek flood plain is about 151 ' at this site
Prior to the City adopting regulations protecting the
public from the dangers developing in the flood plain this
site was filled as was the site for the existing building.
This fill will act as dam during the next flooding and will
increase the flooding elevation
onto
1p8treai
•
t
i
, r,,, —.-, ,.... ,.. w...... -__,u. .,,- .A t......,:1.. ,a.. ._.J"-t;; .,.. ........,.. ._..,.. .,.,:..I,. ,,...,4,,._, ,.,,.:.,,.-'. ._,,.,,..«.L-: .i,ir..;l..,—,_.•w',:a.d.... .............. nI.,F,I.,a..n.,0,.+..,..,.. 4.,..._,..,.........:■«,+r.,,..4.i,....l....,-,,41,,L,
STAFF REPORT
Agenda 5 .1 l
. I Tigard Design Review Board
: September 28, 1976 . .
I Page 2 .
2. Compaction tests are being conducted to assure that the fill '
can carry the anticipated load. The U.B.C. requires 2,000
lbs,/scl. ft .
k; 3. The addition of 5,000 sq. ft . requires the addition of five
parking spaces which are shown on the new plan.
III . RECOMMENDATION ,
Staff recommends approval of the expansion with the same conditions
as attached originally with the exempting of the building from the
greenway easement .
.
y
,
t
i •
•
•
o
1. I /
o
Y
i I
111'14
o
I
,, ,,,. ..,,•, ,. ...•l. ..,.,. .. a.•..,
bit , ■
p•
•
•
•
4*
•
. s
•
4
(b) RENAME EXISTING DEDICATED ROADWAYS R,egla: .sr by City of Tigard
• S.W. 77th Avenue (old name) to S.W. Chvrry Drive portion lying south of
S.W. Varns Street.,running south. to S4W, Fir S raet.
• S.W. Cherry Street (old name) to S.W. Cherry Drive portion ly lng south
of S.W. Fir Street running south and east to S.W. 72nd. Av enue.
▪ S.W. Watkins Avenue (old name) to S.W. Brookside Avenue portion lying
northeast of S.W. Walnut Street and rt,+.tn:n:i.ng northeast 471 feet.
• S. W. Post Road (old name) to S.W. 61re x s Way• portion lying south of
S.W. Summerfleld Drive and running south ,
h trd w $t 694 :teat.
S.W. Post Road (old name) to S.W. G;,.a ;n Wray portion lying south of
�, Sxmmrrf3eld Drive and running sw,:,t u and east 299 fi .t
d
(1)` Public Hearing Opened
(2) Public Testimony - None
0) Public Hearing Closed.
ORDINANCE No 76-35 AN ORDINANCE CHANGING THE NAME OF CERTAIN '
a ROADWAYS, HEREIN SPECIFIED, IN THE CITY OF
TIGA.RD, AND 'DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
(4) Discussion by Council and staff folly*'rt d.
(5) Motion to adopt. Ordinance No. 76-35; Councilman Cook, seconded
by Councilman ,Nickelson.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
(c) DESIGN REVIEW - Review by the City Council of a Design Reviw'Board
,
decision on July 27, 1976, approving a r.tlquaoit by Atial Land Company to i
construct a 16,000 square foot industrial 1.41.�tal'ivg at 9380 S.W. Tigard St„
(1) Public Hearing Opened
(2) Planning Director stated t:;1,.. D :wr; R;v.b.xw;w Board had approved
Atlas Land Company0 s request subject to a standard nonr .monstrance
agreement, but not including a staff r G,.;co i,-,nd -,d 10' dedication ,
on Tigard Street
Planning Director further stated ,Mt. ALLrfA, of Atlas Land
Company, objected specifically to Co,-, ccn.diUUon vf providing a „o
10' right-of-way to the City and that tbw: purpose of the hearing
by Council was to consider WtetNer t: r City kould 'require the
10" dedication omitted by the D0.,�,.t ,n �o �,.=.r�r Board.
•
(3) Public Testimony: Mr. Doug AtLas Land Company, stated he
objected to forced Lo dorm.two a 10
right-of-way En order to bd abit, to construct
an .industr°,aa +w; ,ldiri on a already toned
for that e of cons t tom tion,.
P
( 0 Public Rearing Closed,
i ., (5) Discussion by Council staff aard tyt�::gal Cun, 1 followed.
can r�r r, �.,1 f• �I
],,egal. Counsel stated power a,a.,t� � t:, dr...:,�4,gat:�.d„� to Design Review � � �
Board to enforce the ncn-r k,,,,m n s.',d ru:-,r- o tmv-„vwnt, ho -N,,,er City
Council has not allocated that pawsr Ord,i,nai;. a at .h,i.s t,i.meu
Mr Allred' stated no on hmd ham if N 'would donato the
land.
PAGE
6 Regular Meetin g Minutes August 25 1,976
•
. V
, i
w
1
(6) Motion to
` den " a pp eal9 Councilman Moore,,
s. o nd,ed b..: Councilman ,
Wakemn
Approved b y unanimous vote of Coonc .l. ,
. ,� . 1 (7) Mr. Allred stated he would voluntarily donate the °1O' right-of-way.
180 ORDINANCE No, 76-36 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR A SPECIAL CITY ELECTION TO BE - '
HELD IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON, ON NOVEMBER 2, 1976, '
/
/ IN CONNECTION WITH THE REGULAR.. GENERAL STATE ELECTION, FOR
�
'1, . THE PURPOSE OF SUBMITTING TO THE LEGAL VOTERS OF THE CITY
' OF TIGARD, OREGON, THE QI ESTION OF ESTABLISHING`A NEW
, I{. . TAX BASE PURSUANT TO SECTION 11, ARTICLE XI, CONSTITUTION'
1 OF THE STATE OF OREGON AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY a
(a) City Administrator recommended Co'uacil°s ddup t Lott
I - (b) Motion to adopt; Councilman. Nickelson, st-c.on,dkr,d 'hyCcunci:,lmrn Ct,",,r,;kr,
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
' 19. OTHER
(a) STREET SWEEPER USE POLICY
,
City Administrator stated the current, pol ic, ' was to s•wE:W,p public way only
/ with the exception of public schools.
City Administrator further stated S .aA 't'?..ony's S,.,L,00l had reque$ted their
parking lot be swept. .
Discussion followed by Council and staff.
Motion to deny request; Councilman Wa'kcn, stcond ;d by Councilman Moore,
\. Failed by 3 nay votes to 2 aye: 'vott.s f Comcilmirs Wakem and Moore •
voting aye.
.
Motion by Councilman Michelson, secondHd ty Counclima.n Cook to sweep St.
Anthony's School parking lot one time only.
Approved by 3 aye votes to 2 nay vot.A.,w;, Co nc i s�.,n Wak .m and Moore
• voting nay. r
(b) STATUS REPORT:
. i
Ta..'rd Lumber Company Bui ld.L - City yr Adm inist,.ratot 5tr, t, d 1�,e had ti hf, fkcd 1
plans that show several buildings that wet, s',,..ppo$c:'d h o h ec: ove d within
18 months as a condition of the c otiditi,on.4 ,1 u,s+: a;pc r Jval gr,at t� d 11/21/72." ;,' .
City Administrator further stated he mats, p-,x,,,gc,nai contact., with Ms. Aitken,
1,,c August 19th to encourage voluntary co T 1.i r7e,,s a City Administrator stated ,
Mr. Aitken indicated he would giv'6 a dL.;fin.i.t anwhr, as to what his plans t
were within the next week.
'II 14
Utility Equ.i meat 4 Displly of E •u EL,I t w City Admin w.s t'ra t.or stated staff
f
can not find any outright violation of City Ordinance .regarding a utility
` ', truck with a for sale" sign on priva.te:: propsvrt�y. a t, r
-
Pest Control w City Administrs for ',re:,pottb,d Ps,'r imo�,.,n.t Pest Control had two 1. y
trucks with crews working the City tvt ry 'rid y .,p,raying.,raying for mos q itoes
Administrator further reported Pa,rrmou•n.t wa-, ahLwt-rir!g complaint calls with
regards to yellow w jackets and Iwasp8„
PACE 7 - Regular Meeting Minutes :�, August 2 1, 1976 i'
. r
,
r
' I C t
m
,
r �
, .,...1,,,,,,,.+.4.., ,,,,,,_r.... ,.,,,.,,,,,, ., __,,,,,,.,r:tr,. 1..,n.u.,a.,,,.,.,act,,,,r11,«.,11.,,,.,s:_4_.._. ,.:._..:et41.444x1.4.4ua;rr ga r.,...;,u,...... .c...,.,,..,-,. r.,,..,:,,,,,,J,,..:4, a a ,,...,, ��� '
4.:r,» ...,1.,. ..u...:.,,vS4d..,..,..� .......,tik+..w.,,.;.t_.M.,1;,-:.uir...,.,.bi6di ...4,74;,11,4,T,;,,,,,
e'r°
..es,.. ..r a.rtv�u swr .r..,a,>,e�. , �.. w ou „a.. .«�
yl',
y hI
Y
AFFIDAVIT OF UBLK " CIO ; , ;.
' . CITY OF TIGAIC.D � .
sTATr �{ c�R.ECC�zv, d NOTICE.' c �
_ Pt:Bt,1C IHEA,RING
ss. Notice is hereby given that a ubl►c ,
COUNTY CT? WASHINGTON, P ;.
hearing win be held by the City Council
"n ,11 i", 4;0 at Fowler Junior High Ledture Roorn,'
10865 S,W:Walnut,Tigard,Oregon,on, 4
I, ............... ............... r.o.. .epit...S,ell . e ....... ,_,, August 23 1;I70, at 8.00 I�,Y .'with re✓+
spect to the following
being first duly sworn, depose and say that X am the publisher ___�..rr....__..-..__.,.,...,. CIIANGEt ^Request y
FietdlZer,, 1atisen ..& 'arsos for a.'�
....u,............. of The Tigard Times, a newspaper of general circulation, as defined general plate'and ro ran .:., of
a prnprxed cgmmerct!al-orrice r
• Planned' IeveIOpment located at the i
by ORS 193.010 and 193»020, published at Tigard, in the aforesaid county and S..8, corner of S.W 72nd,Avenue and,-
'
S.W. V`arris Road (Wash, Co, Tai •
state, that the legal notice, a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was ; Map 9.0 0). l
P,ENAINIE EXIS'T'ING DEDICAT-
ublished in the entire issue of said newspaper p 'for .:,.... ._..9,.......,... successive and ED ROADWAYS—Request-. S Request by City'
of Tigard, , _ •
Consecutive weeks in the following issues -.. ., _.__......_.._..» .:_,,,....II_. .H._..,w._._ a,S.W,77th Avenu (old name)to
"� „vr.Cherry Drive,portion lying
. . .g ,.St...12 ._&J.9.s ..1976. �"r of S.W. Varns Street et running
.-._w.,_.._. ... .. . .__ ._ _ S to S V4r. Fir Sere t.
' ���1 ( 7.... b.S.W.Cherry Street(old narrie)to
--rte `? .' ». � `�..,_�' `_ ,
' S.W.Cherry Drive,portion l r.n
(Sigriatuzre) S. of S.W. Fir Street, y g
running 5..+
and E. to S.W. 72nd Avenue.
,
c'r",,W. Watkins Avenue (old
f name) to S.W. Brookside Ave-.-...... ......,....». y
..Subscribed and sworn to before me this L t4Y ....... day of portion lying N.P. of .W '
t Street and running N.E.August/9_9. C
471 feet.
d,S.W, Watkins Court (old. . 1 c.. name to S.W. raol.side Ccit portion r% ,z
lying N.W.
of S.W.W
atkins Ave-
/ Notary I'� lie of Oregon
nue and running N.'W, 206 feet. .
„, c,S.W. Post Road (old name) to
My commission expires ..,..... .zW f't. . '. :15...a L' St.W. Greens Way, portion lying
Sr of S.W. ,Stxfnrnerfield Drive
,. �.. _ and running S, W. 694 feet.-. .-- f.S.W, Post Road ,(old name) to ,.
I S.W. Greens Way portion Iying p
S. of
S.itttrimerfield, rive i'
and run
in
g S.
S. & E 299
teat.c
et
:
I zri .r ier the Cit y Council M a Design Review ew
Board decision on July 27,`1076, ap , .
proving a request by Atlas Land '
Company to construct a 16,000 . M
' square font industrial building at
9380 S.VV.'. Tigard Street. ,
-tc.
rested persart�e
may appear
and be heard in favor of or against the;
said proposal. ,. •
BY ORDER OF THE
'
CiTY`COUIICIL
Dori. I��
O
•
tt k'
(TT �4 City Recorder „
( �1 Publish Aug, 12,'19, 1976) !
f I ,
•I
I
e
, �
M
i I
,
r
August.
� � g � . ." a la '
Atlas d Company
• 93 O a �, Ti ard A
venue � .
Re; Oequest by C L t Council of Desigxa Review board
on July 27, 1976„ approving a reques tea eo n true t a, ; .
160000 sgtia e root' i t' triesL building at 98C) S. .
Tigard Street, ,
`Y I.,• Dear Mx. Allred;
• ' „ . Please bp advised, the City Council of Tigard, at their regular meeting. ,
August
9th,h set i public hearing regarding t above request for, 8 OO ,
• P.M., Aug t 2 3rd, 1916 at Fowler Junior' High School 'Lecture, Roo , ,
.
„ 10865 W . a lnu H Street, r1, Oro n
: If you have any questions regarding; the hearing-0 please feel free to
' ' coma t ma or the Planning Department.
Sincerely,
Doris Har G' '
i ter , �co de „
OT � 1e' fell ko ledgrne t� must be x� ace .vre d by� the',Ci. y,
ai soI� u1trinattonb ' tet
• n 4I days u your receipt
g a ,ubl y
W
i
I j 1 I
y9
r
A `. M ,.. .. "...A .,.....� Y a�..wn...a.U4Yya'rl ,, ,.,_. ,,
. . .
5 _
T I G A R D C I T Y C O U N C I L
I
r 1
Study Soss'..on Minutes August 5, 1976, 7:30 P.M. i A
1. ROLL CALL: President: Mayor Wilbur A. Bishop; Councilmen John
E. Cook, Alan W. iiickelson, Robert C. Moore, Lynn
R. Wakem; Lieutenant Donald L. Rea, Police Department;
J,DQ Bailey, Legal Counsel; Richard Bolen, Planning
Director• Rick Daniels Associate Planner; Bruce P. '4� '
Clark, City Administrator) Doris Hartig, City Recorder;
Arline; O'Leary, Administrative Assistant
. '1 ',2. COUNCIL REVIEW OF SITE PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW W 1PI
R0 TAI OF APPLICATION
BY ATLAS LAND COMPANY, 9380 'S.W. TI ARD AVE,
(a) City Administrator pointed out the specific situation with
f Atlas Land Company brings attention) to the need for Council
to clarify and set policies in regards to the delegation of
responsibility and authority of the Planning Commission and n'
} the Design. Review Board.
Administrator further stated policy should also be set by the
City in the area of what conditions shall be required in new
development.
Legal Counsel stated the City did not have an ordinance clearly
stipulating where the powers lie or what conditions can actually
be applied to new development. Legal Counsel further stated,
if directed by Council, he would work with Planning staff on
developing the ordinances needed.
Lengthy discussion followed by Council, Legal Counsel and
staff with regards to Greenway dedications, right-of-way
dedications and/or easements and clarifying authority and powers
of Planning Commission and Design Review Board.
(b) Associate Planner Daniels stated the Design Review Board had
approved SDI 22-76 (Atlas Land Company) subject to all staff
recommendations with the exception of item 2 and 3 and adding
Design.', Review Board approval to item 8.
u
Daniels further stated the Design Review Board requested a I'
meeting with Council to clarify their responsibility and
,uthori ty.
Ditiuuss7 on followed and Council questioned if City had authority
Lo require partic.ipat ion in future street improvements and
q 1
dedication of right-of-way for future improvements. 1
•
L��u1 Ccun�el stated Cit y did have the authorit y and City
r.7r- " ;istrator recommended Council take jurisdiction of SD1.22-76. i,
, y
•,,. .,e.k'.',....-,.,.,_r LF:...r..n..ta....+..,1..ar.J..._r,s,w-:«r,:.l..l:...:.....wue.•.a....., r... ,r u....,.r..N....rr.r.,..,r,..,,,JC.n..n^I.u..1 M.+wL_........`..r....L..a.ka.4..,r.sw..w.,.c.>>.,,..a..d..t,t.A.aA«.u...x.,_1A........u,.+t.t.•.....•,....r,...a......-.S.:.ti A^rt....u..ri.":r' /..1h..v.lf;.r'J...r.lA:.,r...,nalMr..Tx_,s,.t-.J:k....v41.f....,..;,:r...;z.W-.*.a....ra..,...w;a.,-.1L:4amra.:,l.t'.V4rsuN,
1 seconded a
(c) 1��o-tioxa. by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Cook,
by Councilman Wakem, to place SDE• 22-76 in Council jurisdiction
and set Public Hearing for August 23, 1976 commencing at 8:00
P.M. at E owlet/ Jr. High Lecture Room.
Discussion followed.
—Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
3 PROPOSED STREET NAME CHANGES
(a) Council and staff reviewed the proposed name changes.
(b) Council concurred and directed staff to prepare ordinance and
resolution and legal descriptions for Council approval at
August 9th meeting.
4. PARK BOARD RULES AND REGULATIONS
(a) City Administrator and Council discussed Park Rules.
Administrator reported the rules would be posted at all parks
later in the year and that the Explorers were handing out copies
to p eople living in the vicinity of Jack and Woodard Parks.
5. NOISE ORDINANCE
(a) City Administrator reported the City had received two noise
complaints, one residential and one industrial. Administrator
stated he had requested assistance in monitoring the sites
from DEQ and, after considerable time lapse, DEO monitored the
industrial site and notified the City they would not monitor
the residential site.
Administrator reported contact had been made, with the EPA
office in Seattle to borrow a meter. Administrator further
stated to effectively carry out the noise ordinance the
City would ''probably used to purchase a noise meter.
Council and staff discussed need to purchase noise ,meter i n '
the near future.
6. OTHER:
(a) TIGARD COMMUNITY YOUGH SERVICES City Administrator reported
TOYS had requested a $1 OOa advance from the City.
Discussion by Council end, staff followed.
PAC:' 2 COUNCIL 'MINUTES - AUGUST 5, 1976
I 1 r
l.a
•
II ,
July 29, ill
e.
MEMORANDUM t
'1
i
To: City Council
4'
From: City Adrinist '?tor ! .) plr M .
Subject: City policy regarding dedications and improvements in conjunction ?
with development proposals. C
t.t
q ,
It appears to be timely for City Council to address itself to clarification
of City policy rel e ting ,to conditional approvals of development proposals. '
J. Recently thc:', following incidents have occurred which should be addressed by
Council: r
. a. Councilman Moore has questioned the appropriateness of requiring j;•.;
dedications and improvements in conjunction junction'with zone changes and, other.
land use approvals;
i
b. Attorney Bailey hats indicated that such conditions may not be ^ ;, -
best iimposed e t' the zone change step; , ,
•
C. Council has indicated its intention to meet with the various°
Boards & Crrnm7.ssions to provide 1'.c tter direction on policy matters, ' h
1
• , I
d. The Design Review Board has indicated a desire for specific
policy direction in this area;
q.
r
e. A recurrent question has arisen as to which Board (Planning
Commission or tlesipn Review Board, or both) should be requiring
dedications, etc. This is further corpl.ice ted by the fact that not all
. development proposals go before the Planning Commission;'
f. On Tuesday, July 27, the Design Review Board expressed concern
over their authority to require dcdic+ 'L'i.t''ns and improvements for. a
'1'i gard Street property which did, eot need rrior action by the
• 1'ennin g Come i scion and further voted to approve the development plans i ,e' .
without requiring str street dedication, s dde l,,elk c on str ucti n, non-
- i
remonstrance agre n,ent for future street improvements and a greenway ,
dedication,
•
Other pro7erti.es located on. Tigard Street have recently been required
.,. to meet these some conditions of approval;
g: Staff has a copy of a memorandum to the subject property owner from,
._ his attorney effectively stating that the City may not requite dedications
u .and improvc rments.
1
fi • A staff meeting tin.g � i t.h Attorney Bailey resulted in a .'�nee,nsus' that the ability
°
to require improvements and dedications raas nary for the City to
r -,,, ::t ively .gui de growth, that both the 1'1enning C'rmri sai,on .end Drs:ign Rcvi ,w
Board el!euld, have the authority to wake such r'equitr,..ments that, it appeared
that gisa a Livc action could clear up any possible em igui.ties in the Codes . .
and fir l ly that Council cdiould use this case as a medium to .1) test the
existing code' provisions and (2) provide specific 'policy direction to the '
Design Review Board and l'lenning Col.,f�ission.
ir
•
•
•
•
.,....,i.,... n ...r„......_,r,...l „ 44 7N/e5 avu . 4„Pa7.:..7,.y'
w..i.fG.r.,r.rte::,L...{t3I:X.+.v.....="L�:+A.Y'»4RYt,;.i:rv.`an:t.YW.0 uti'tt
• b FRA F 1
Page 2
July 29, 1976
Memo
From: C.A.
•
Councilman Cook has requested Council review of the Tigard Street development
proposal. There are two areas of concern, The first related to how the
City will treat this property in relati.onslbip with other similarly located
developments. The, second is the broader question of what City policy is and
how to achieve it if our present actions and Code are not sufficiently precise,
•
•
' I ,
•
•
11 ,f1() CITY OF TIGARD
Iro►►otro "" P. 0. Box 23557
12420 S. W. Main
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Jul 29,2 1976
Atlas Land Company
9380 S.W. Tigard Street
Tigard, Oregon 97223 File: SDR 22-76
Dear Sir:
Please be advised that the Tigard Design Review Board at their
• . regular meeting of July 27, 1976 , considered your request for
approval of a new 16,000 square foot industrial building at
• 9380 S .W. Tigard St. Your submission was approved subject to .
the following conditions:
1 .
Either a cross easement
ag reement be recorded assuring
joint use of the access drive or the two lots be com-
bined to form one tax lot .
2. Landscaping along the front of the building be ;con-
tinued up to the building.
3. Tam Juniper be planted 4 ' on center.
• 4, The landscape islands be curbed
5. 6" wheel blocks be provided for all parking stalls.
6 . The signing program consist of, a 32 sq. ft directory
sign ith, r mounted signs s ' w wail rrao identification f cation sa.�ns not to
exceed 12 ' and be subject to Design Review Board
approval .
7 . plan lan be submitted to Staff for approval:'
g
•
8 . All utilities serving the site 'be placed underground,
9 . A 50 greenway acro ss the flood plain be
}
' granted for greenway purposes. with parking improvements
ted r .�
shown on the approved site plan exempt from, the green
way easement
If we can be of any further assistance, ' please do not hesitate
to contact this offices 039-4171 ,
Sincerely,
I Richard Danxo s
: sf
A
s8
ociate Planner
1 '
•
r
` J '. �,.r•.-•° ...L I..............r.,w, t r� .v,..w,,u,t.0 m_r,.w t,a.._xik. ..,.4,.+'.JJ....,i.,..}.,ai.rM µ.:lt+..«...w..1,..k,,«r 4rux, 11.. a...., .a u r r.5.,,. , ,, Jva, w.+,:,.ir.u.4 '
,:C f
must
the
City
' Note: The following acknowledgment �. be received by y ,
of Tigard within fourteen (14) da'ys' of your receipt of
this letter Failure to return this acknowledgment may
result in action by the City of Tigard,
'
1.,
I hereby acknowledge e t
hxs
� et�
letter docu
nent an g
the ac t io n o�
th
e
I
1
,
Tigard Design Review Board. I have received and read this letter
and I agree to the decision here documented and to abide by
rn N,h,
any 'terms and/or conditions attached. E'
.� a
1-'6' (//lef•eiK'''''',//eA'-f;'4-t4
signatre ,
date,
„,
cc: Building Official .
'
. Engineering Dept .
J
,
J
I
i
,
e
n
,r
1.
y
{
b'
`I
', ........m..,....i ..-. ......:w. . .6...z.u„..,,..a'k-...i.r...-+ .u,.....,•».+.«_.....ku4,..F...-..,J..•....1.A...1.M.,a...::•t.v...,.d/.....,a_.n.4r.ro•.._..,-,.;....,__,I... .N_,La...xx,r,.Iw+.,,.Miar'..«n..i..k,.zluw•ri„,rJ:.s.::.etlkC?:inn..Y.,+•aN,^1,.;xvur......nLl;-..«,.l i•r.-,:1.1.,».:..J.,W.......:.:•tS"..tl....«&.-.1.r....IM:i:,sae•-u.,i:..«,..1w.,G.,..t,t...erM:.:y1F.1;il,r.;'Dt.K«i«uY ••
•
•
MINUTES
Tigard Site Development Plan and Architectural Review Board
1 July 27, 1976 - '5. 00 P.M.
General Telephone Building
12460 S.W. Main St . -- Tigard, Oregon
1 . CALL TO ORDER: Meeting was called to order at 5:10 P.M. by
Chairman McMonagle.
2 . • ROLL CALL: Present : Hammes, McMoiiagle, Cook and. Goldbae h.
Absent : Olson
Staff Present : Daniels, Edwards
3. MINUTES: Cook moved and Hammes seconded that the minutes of
July 13, 1976, be approved as submitted'. The motion was
approved by unanimous voice vote .
4. COMMUNICATIONS:
None
5. DESIGN REVIEW '
5 . 1 SDR 22-76 (Atlas Land Company)
A request by Atlas Land Company for review of a new 16,000 ' sq.
foot industrial building at 9380 S .W. Tigard Street .
A . Site Development Plan Review
•
1 . Staff Report : Road by Daniels ,
o A correction was made on item #4 in Basic Facts
changing the 20 ' center line setback to read 30 ` ,
o An addition to number 4
under Findings indings was made
stating that "The NPO II projects 7500 vehicles
a clay at this site . In order to provide the
Proper facilities additional right of way is
needed. "
o An additional finding labeled #15 was read to the
Board. #15 stated that "The T.C.P. NP II and
Tigard Bicycle and Pedestrian Ways Plan show a �.
greenway along Panno Creek. Access across this
parcel is necessary to continue this greenway and.
r
path system to provide for adequate non-motorized
vehicular circulation . "
B. Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the following conditions:
1 . Either a cross easement agreement be recorded assuring
joint use of the access drive or the two lots be corn-
blued to form one tax lot.
2.1 An agreement to participate in future improvements to
•
' 9
r .
.. ..........-..x. _,..-.... . ..,............. ....«.�.,.»,_.....-.«,....-1...:.i"a.,I..,. ...G..._.., ,...._..,.._.a........_.JwM,n»..«,...«..........«_.,,..I.w. .1.-....+. ..,. ..._.4......t+..-k..-.,..,.a.w.1...e«..-,..n,..«.,...»u.A..:,.1:...:_.......... ...-..,14x..:z_.il:'-:.;4c,..l..,=..i_...,w«...,-«L.., 1 I:u.,
Minutes
July 27, 1370
Page
m
Tigard rigaxd st . be filed with a City Recorder: .
3 . A. dedication of 10 ' along SW Tigard St. be completed .
for, future widening.
4 . Landscaping along the front of the building be
•
continued up to the building. .
5. Tam juniper be planted 4 ' on center., I' .
•
• 6. The landscape islands be curbed.
7. 6" wheel blocks be provided for all parking stalls.
The
cr
r'r
8 . rJ.�e signing program consist of a 32 square foot
directory sign with wall mounted identification signs
not to exceed 12 ' . -.,
9 . Irrigation plan be submitted to staff for approval .
10. All utilities servin g the site be placed underground, '
11 . A 50 ' greonway easement across the flood plain be
granted for greonway purposes, with parking improvements
shown on the approved site plan exempt from the green-
way easement ,
• C. Board Discussion
o Mc on a.gl e questioned the 50 ' Green'lyay easement conflict-
,
ing with the parking spaces .
o Staff replied that the one space in question would be
able to remain since it would not conflict with any
• future h i.kepath.
o Cook suggested that item #8 the signing program come •
back for Design Review Board approval .
o McMonag ..e asked what type of irrigation would be
placed on the site ,
o Applicant agreed to space hose bibbs every 50 ' and
submit final plan to staff ,
m v.e and Hammes seconded to : approve the proposal
aosal
o Cook o d � r� � �« � �
with s t a f f recommendations a n d adding ;Design R e v i e w
• Board approval to item S
o The motion was unn.n imou fly approved by voice vote,
o Staff brought to the attention of the Chairman that
the applicant had boon waiting to speak,
•
.... ..,c:. 1.,....i..,,»....,I.,.. ..d,...._.....,.,.........,, ..,_..i._... N.....-.a,+..n..,.......--,. ...•.,......t.:a.....ri .._...... ,_ .,4."....-..,, e.s -w., :r. ..,. ni.,,r n "
, ...4..,.!» .,..1.,.. L',. ..u..:k»t.._...iF.+.+._ .._.i,.,.u',t..A«.,, "kU.v ...,...t'. .,.._.......A ..aku......a..a:......wL...l..:...U..,..Hi:l...',t,+n.1.:... ,,.r:.. ..
Minutes W•
July 27, 1976
Page 3
f o
•
McMonagle asked to bear the applicant.
o Applicant stated that he felt that item #2 and #3
were not items that should be considered by Design
Review. He also felt that it was unfair to have him
•
dedicate land when other, people 'uexe paid for it
,• Applicant also questioned the constitutionality of the
I request
o McMonagle informed the applicant that there was a
pending lawsuit involving this issue.
o Cook asked to amend the motion including all staff .
recommendations except item 2 and 3 and adding
Design Review Board to item 8. The motion was
seconded by Hammes . A voice vote indicated three in
favor of the motion and. one McMonagle against.
D. Architectural Review
1 , Applicants Presentation
o Architect explained design and materials to be
used.:
o McMonagle asked of what materials would the
canopy be made?
I .
o Architect stated that the material could be either
metal o r wood.
•
o Hammes said he would prefer wood
I I
I
• o Hammes moved and Goldbach seconded to approve the
architectural d e sa.g n :
o The motion was unanimously approved by voice vote:)
•
•
I .
I I I
li
,r...;,?;a •
tl 11
i
'
July �} y 1977
i
• , ..,4 ,,,- ' Da R. Allred
Atlas Land Company
9380 S.W. Tigard Avenue
Tigard, Oregon 9722
Dear Mr. Allred:
Re: SDE 22-76
Please be advised: that the landscaping which has been installed for
s� your new industrial.a building at 9380 S.W. Tigard Avenue is not in
,'. . compliance with the approved plan
This landscape plan was approved by the Design Review ;Board on Sept-
ember 28 1976 It is sta.V's view that the approved plan is en-
* "perior in design plant material and compatibility to the landscaping
which has been installed for the adjacent building.
Section 1858080 (a) states, "The Planning Ji ✓cV J k may rP WW ye a
bond or other adequate assurance as a condition of, the design plan
that conforms to the ,i,pprgy dd design plan is completed.
w• (b), "Landscaping shall be installed prior to issuance of occupancy
permits, unless security equal to the cost of the landscapin, as de-
termined by the Planning Director is filed with the City Recorder as
curing such installation within six months after occupancy.
Since the occupancy of the building hinges on landscape installation ,
according to the approved plan or posting of an adequate bond, this
// . r,
matter should he resolved as soon as possible.
/ Tease contact me at this office if you have any questions concerning
the above matter.
Sincerely,
Nancy vdward:
Assistant Planner
I r.l I f
I 4
r ^' / , ;,, ,, ., X14
' l 1 •
r
STAFF Rt',POR'T
i., and Site Design Plan
_ and •&rohitectUal Design Review Board
July
my 13, 1976
General Telephone 5:00 p.m.
Tigard, Oregon
DOCKET: SDR 22-76
REQUEST: For site and ax ch tect al review of a proposed
5
e
d
:15000' industrial building.
LOCATION: 9380 SIT Tigard Avenue,
.a
APPLICANT: Atlas Land Company t
BASIC FACTS:
1. Site is designated as general industrial on the Neighbor-
.
hood Plan II and zoned MY.1.4 (Industrial Park) .
2. The surrounding land use consists of an existing industrial
warehouse building on the east, the Oregon Electrical
Railroad tracks on the north, Farm Creek flood, plein, on
the south, and a five unit single story apart=none building
to the west.
3. Fanno Creek flood plain at this site is approximc.`ceJ y 151' . .
4. SW Tigard r� Street as �. arterial in the
Y{. .. 1». 1� f ,..wry, �''.'''�{,:` e � is designated �a� a� r
1 N�1 W�4.1.4i�d !�1•�� �
Neighborhood Plan :I and the Tigard Municipal Code requires
a 201 center line setback prior to measuring the required
40' front setback.
5, SW Tigard Avenue is pr osently 40t right way.
6, Section 18,60,l20 Tigard I unicipal Code requires one
parking space per 1000 square feet industrial uses
FINDINGS
1.
All setbacks have been satisfied.
2. Nininurn of 15 parking spaces need to be provided on, the
• site. 12 are sho vm. on the site plan. The other three can
. 1 be added to the front of the building when the loading
areas are further delinated K
3, Applicant proposed a 361 curb out to be used jointly
by the existing building end the new building which are
on s,pf.Arete tax lots, The code requires that the tax
• lots either be oolab n.ed or a cross a rye,:i.•ient be executed*
,. ,,r ,d Street is s n.t,l' in a substandard condition
and needs improvement in the ncar 'uture
«
i I
•
•
0 ,. .,. r.u,.r ..vt .n.. 1.''.1. .:.....r. F.0 ...ft.+....v.......:yA ....,,,« w4wY,l:vvJ..,.....,...1•...+G..I.,w.t..n: ..,...t.r.w.id.' 4..-w-..-, „y,Arraua.a.0 i..n, ,,..urw..,..+n:..n-..l.,J.-Wr*..-.rv.....t:/M CM.s..:....-u..:Md ,is'..:.:.1 AHlw4....r..,:--..-•v.•.-,.,n,•`Ar..x:J•in..i:.,rAr:tkA«...L'til„+.... 7}J J11:i.,...Aa..,(-rl-%1.:.r.r•i+n..,.•tp
Staff• Report f
s
" Design Review Board
july 13, 1976 1
Page
5. SW Tigard Street is presently 10 right way whereas a
60' right way is called for in code. An additional
l0 dedication appears to be necessary. r
ti
6. Section 18.58.0 30 Tigard Municipal Code requires that all t
areas not occupied by paved roadways, s tructures or walk- #`.'
ways be landscaped. The applicant has shown: landscaping
in all the mentioned areas axcept immediately adjacent
to the building on the T .gar,d Street sides '
Section 8 5 80 also requires that a minimum of the k'
front 20 feet of the lot be landscaped. The site plan
shows Tam juniper, Azalea, Birch and Shore Pine. The
selection of material appears to be adequate although the
Juniper appears to have too large of spacing.
The site plan proposes 4' to 5' tall Shore Pine along the
'7a J. p P g
west side of the new .building. This should adequately I .
screen the industrial building
or the existing apart-
ment
building
8. The applicant proposes to locate three landscaped caped .s7 ands
• in the parking lot. The two at the front should adequately
out off the visual impact of the two parallel buildings
with parking in between and should eliminate the ("bowling i;
alley” Ieffect, as will, the landscaped island adjacent to
The new building.
1 .
• 9. The plan to have Sycamores, 8 to 10 feet
tall, in the planting islands with an evergreen ground
cover and flowering shrubs. Visual impact across Fanno
Creek is L.inimizod by the location of the existing o
and ash trees along Faino. These will remain,
10. The code requires 611 wheel blouks on parking stalls. t
• Il. No signing program has been submitted.'
•
12. No irrigation system for maintenance of the landscape
is shown. N'
. 15. The Tigard Municipal Code requires sidewalks serving all
parcels. No sidewalk .,s shown, en. the site plan.
14. Tigard. Municipal Code requires all utilities
to be under-
ground
•
I � E
•
( t
... _ .w.„ ..x.M.,:.a.....4—...h._:..,..ww.4:.'. u...t..di..... iv... ..RAJ.,-...,.0 1,..w..r..,J.ke.._'.4u,,,L4.,_._1...:.•+..:..naw.ll.f,.iN,..w:.nw.1.,-.:.::;:,..,.,w.,_!.;. ''
• 1 • . .r. ,•«u:,,,.. - ,.t3+.....,..:ai)..;..:.....J.:at»' a r._' '
taaA,
Staff Repor t
i Design Review Board
July 13, 1976
?a,e
Staff recommends approval of the following conditions:
•
1. Either a cross easement agreement be recorded assuring
joint use of the access drive or the two lots be combined
to form m one tax lot.
2. An agreement to participate in future improvement's to SW
Tigard St.. be filed with the city Recorder.
3. A dedication of 10? along SW Tigard St. be completed for
future widening.
4. Landscaping along the front of the building be continued
• up to the buildings
4
5. Tam Juniper be planted 41 on center.
6. The landscape islands be curbed.
7m 6 ' wheel blocks be provided for all parking stalls.
8. The s
icna ng program consist of a 32 4
directory 3 r
J Un with
Lh
wall mounted identification signs not to exceed 12' .
a,
9. Irrigation plan be submitted to Staff for approval.
rr 1
10, n adjacent A .� sidewalk be placed acl.,��,c�x.t to the property knew
11. All utilities serving the site be placed underground
I I .
S ,
,.Aa.v. 1. . .,,.' .. .. ..•, 1, n u.,
•N,., ,,,. .�....»4,4. „ .. . . ,...._«...•,,...,...«r...»a„ .n........+.....1.. ,,.«»»..v......« •a....,n.r+,+n,n.n....r.......,u.,.,,,_.�..
,r.
.w•» ,A,,.
u0 4,n:.1.•n..,.ua,z.�.l""r
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW
•�� Site Plan Review
File Nb.
Architectural Review i
Fee Received
Receipt # 9
APPLICATION -----� `
Date Received ,1"
Tigard Planning Commission.
12420 SW Main St. , Tigard, Or. 97223 By -- ---
i
639--4171 w .�.�.' .•
r � n
r a-ti
6/77
Project Title D at e Filed
Project Address ...,2 —0(3_,5 4E2,.n..2 g .2 �. �.....�.» .. .�
Tax Map No. Tax Lot No
. Owner Developer „_,,z .„2.1.2../eq,„.5.____L
Address 9'020 ,‘ „ ' »»,»: -, ,0_:�:2 l _.,. , Telephone
r Ownex t$ (Ace ang.e ex)71_ Telephone '2_9/ y 0 /.
Signature- _
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
•
Proposed Use ; BU,i_ldil ..___ . U .its �.�.�...
• ,. r y -r..�� 'M'.ML .�4�.w.J..w.J1 war._w.p.l rr.4.IMr..,..rw.rY,wr�r..r.wYlF..�.n.y}��� .«rrrrw+TbN.r+w�wr.� I[ J 0 W
r 'ww. � 'k+....�w+�.�w.+Mpwwww•.wh+lw. n.y+rrn.wr�w�.yu..brw+...rurrwX.+W 4'� •. .
Site Size 1 :3 Tot. Sq. Ft. of Buildings /
Sq. Ft. of Paving Coe .n Sq. F . of Liandscapingivayi
Anticipated Development
Date
D to e-t
.. 4,r..�rw.M.'
• � I
Anticipated Development 1cpnent PhaseS
Ve.luaticn ...- �
rlu'ww»^«s- 'a"";r W- Cw+w.......,....-.r.w.....w.,,. �. a..-•�- ,.�+.o-w.,..a:...».d,.. .. vw .n---.�..-....,-r _
DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LIB
Special Conditions - Dedications
Bonding .r._. .. �...�. ..... :.. .».�.... . .-._ �:
Other
Final Inspection by Date
VC2 tio
•
I
I I
I .
— ;) # $
C. S c a a d STATEMENT
STEARNS ROCK CRUSHING
EXCAVATING = 12400 5. illy_ Tu��C>~U1 R AD
} _, f,,,
SHER�N�t3D. flRE6t j Route.�. Box:275 2
625 I
Newberg,.
4 -
Oregon 97'i32 _
Telephone 53-3097- -
= i
T
�� , '� '
- TO
DATE
; ._ , . . °IQ/L.& t�
-___ - - _ :‹f-tee/ id:64f- V,
f_.� 3,90 5. 16_ /f- 'C 1 y� fk
CITY - =. t-� ` _
_ ,k,./:11-
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION WITH REMITTANCE
f
1
- DATE CHARGES AND CREDITS I
_ j DA AlANCE
y�� cam- --— la �.
IMF Q� �� ��5:c � k --- try _ t 1 k- - -
, 1111-1111
I -
- Ilia FA jF .3.,4 �0 � (fly !� � 2&& G�n
ti �� - ------- - - -� - -- - -- - L ---_- - - -- - III- z '� -
7/I i , -*. ,
�j j
_`` `- . 9 O -,,,
_- _ _ a f (--).----,,
. , ,--, ..,'----7 -1 1 rli L__ / -1
: MR t t f� s- F'�`i1 i~ir `` i mac_ TJ
v9 - i 6..
IMMO , 6"701q•12
, •
.. =
: � _= =_}
MEW.
- - r - 4 it
;4k si =£=
i_,_ .'1
g
t°
z YOUR CHECK IS YOUR RECEIPT s
s.__
s
' �'
Y=our- Check is Your Receipt _
_ _ � .
- -- _ -- _ r _ _ .--4,..;7-:.-"':,7-,--1-: -_-',:-`,___-*"--:---- -ti..- T_-4Y'.- _ c�S - - _ 'TT. 7trl lt - - •
n •-£ - •- .cam-�
v � 1
s
- LS.xe.Rq'taee..–.r–.v�-_s -._. -_ _ —
-- -- -- ___
s,--• 1 .,.'�tr`.r- •�' c4 '-0 .. +YO,..'u�Z`�-',�W+: r� -`l�.r�a.-✓_w �- .
_v : `_
•`r-'.`-. -/ rt.. r - tea -~_ - ~<a,� - - •�t �•<.ii,. ••. r Y- `t`1- r•'a. '..:,11:,:.`'•j') - ``�- - c jl:t r._ •'C:� -
_ r __ - it - r 4, - :/ rri-2�- _ - - _ '��aa f` a t C _- - 2 - 1_ '\„- i j - - :L'a t•i �+<, i - • - -.
a _ _ . - - .
_ _ I� "rfr !- wa tft•'.- �it7,.!....c. - �• I • gat. ,t(70 ..t a - - i•1< t,• a_ .4.,. :7f UC tir t - _ - _ -
_F - -�'`•. - ,.-v _ "• --- _ 1:4C _ -I i+,?Z--- '.1 . _ y_---t i� a, , r ;"•. .'�'ix. ,r�l< y w r = -
..4. "-y`.;,. - ,, .•r.. r !, r T r <f ttr - _ / r r�5 - r.x . E`■ � ,. :-,1-...-;-",r=r'' ' j.I `r.. .� S
-- - ,f �' .l S_ ,� t/•sr f: -() . I n s is •x't r�`!t ` 4 'art r r y
- _- - - -_'``.-.-� - --- •-•,c`- tr -x -'ri -.wit, - _ a`,i k,. .P j ,r:
. \
.�..�,., .,.. .. .� .... �. .. ...,.,....,..,.....�,.,._..,.. ._„�.»._..«�, ......_.,. .. _.,.,..,,ai.,«�__.,. �.«.. ..,..,r �...-.».+_u.,..,...r„�,........,,�N ,-, -....,, uxcu,.ia,...,,,....raw, ..m.,..,,,..•..,.0 ,..,.awr.'..c..
•
�b .\
1' 'c'',' .
. .
, . ,
,,
0.
. .
... . .
. .
. .
,L.
. .
. .,. .
.. .
.,. .
. ,
,, , ,
., .
, . .
, , , ,
,A1. ,. ,e,,.
.,, .
. : .
,.
. . .
: ,
,. ., .. . ...,
,, .
. .
. , . ..,..,. , :..,
. ,, ,r,
. .
.. . . , .
. , .. . ,.
. ,
,,.. . ., . , .,
, .
. . ,
. , ,
ti I.: .
,.. ,. , . ..
. . . .. ,
. , .,. . .. ., .. . ,
. . ,
, L. H . ,, .
. ,,.. .. . ........... . ... . . ,.....
, i! ,.\ \
•
s
1 .\''''\. ':AH,'
•
. ' T h. Dki..) .
. . ..
, ,, ,
. .
. ,
. ,. s.,
..
. • ,
.,,„_......_,,,
, .
.. . .
. .
N
\. .
. ,
. . ., .,,,
. ,
. .
, . . ,
1�,
, .
. • . . .
. . , . . * ,
. ,
. ,
, , .
. ,
. ,
. .
■
. . I'
, .
1 .. .
. . ,.
, .
. .
, . .
. .,
. .
. . . . .
. , .
, ..
....... . ,
.. .. . , .
,. . , .
. ...„. . .. . r
. . . . .,
. ,
. , . ... . . . .
. , . .. ..
. . . . . ..
. . . . .
. . .
. .
I ... . . . . .
. , . .
. . • . .
. .. . . .
, . . 7
, , . . , .
, , . . ,
. ,
.,
.. , .
. , . ,. . ,
. ,
. , ,
.„„„,,,,,i . , . , .
i . .
. , .. . . „
.- (.\
. . ,
, . .
, . . . . .
..
. ,
. ,
.. .. , .. , .
. .. . : .
. ..... , . . .11, :iii, . ..„). ,
.•
, . ,......... .. .. ..... ............... ., „.
. . .. .
, . ,
. , , .
. . .
, . . . .
., . . . . . .
, , . , ,
. . . .
. . .
. ,
. . . . ..
. .
. . , ,
., .. . . . , . : . , „ . . .
. , , , . . ..
, . . , . . ,
. ,. .
. , . , . , . .
. , . . ..
. ,
, , .
, . ,
. . . , .
. , , . .
. ,
, . . , .
. , .
. . . .
. . . . .
, . . . . ,,
. . .
, . . .
,, , . . .
, , . . .
, .
, .
., . . . . , . .
. . . , ..
. .
, . .. . . „ . . 1 .
. . , . , , ,
, . . , . , . . .. ,,, , . , .. , ,
. . .
. ,
. . , ,. „,
. . .
. . , , .. , .
.. . , .
. . , ... .
. .
... , , , . . .,.. . .
, , , ,.
, . . . : , , , . ,,,,i
. . ,
, .. ,
. . . ” . . , . ..
. .. . . .
. , , : . .
, , . . ,
. , ,
:.
. . . . . . . . . . .1 . .. . .. : . . . . ::,
. . . .. . . ,.,
. . .
. .. .
. : .
. . , , .
. . ., . .
. . .1,, ;; , . , . . . . . ...
„ ,. . . .. , . . . .
. .
. . . . , .
. . . : . , . ,
:.
. , . .
. . . .
, . . . .
.. .
i
. ,
i
. . . ..
( • . .
. , , , • .... ) , ..,,,. .,, .