SDR21-76 POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
'.n' �. r .. '`-,.,-�.rt; ,.,.. •,.', 1',., \1- 1, -t a - -iv.�, ,+,1n..:.1..�.tr+++«. ,s� •. -,_,.. ..,,r�.,, „1 :; ,,.a
' rH..-r,,.•ull..•b,�.�„Awl,.wa«-,,'Hd�w�,.rM,t:n,.u.,,,l.._�':1'.re.m..l.,.,1���a.-+�a.un,n,«�Nmw...,.,..lajr „51 -/ I-� t I �-.th? ^,r t�7, � � � � � `k' r
■
'I 1.i* gQ G$':FUNFRA ,'r.Ho I t i l • .
yrz � velp � h �e�r � ( Dt '7u )`L
` 1 11831 rSW ,Pacifa.c figh. air 1 ,1
F, _ ,,., . .. �x•,..1 ..r. 4 w.«t..,..r,._,t,.,.u.�s,+..,...,t.«w..,,.r,..ra.,tu 1,.1 IG.,,.., Ir,,.,sa....«,+.,.._:-.�x,.lr.
•
•
r a
}
• yyl l
• r
III
I "
e
I
a
i
V
1,
r
1
I
I
. A,,.v,°W.� .,•,�.,e...,. .,.. .. „� ,.,.n,.u.w.....w.w,..-+ar.,.,. „„ � 1..,,„�� �,, a :r r^.r ,.m. ,,... n.,., ,,,. ..,,. ..,.ur.�. „ .,, ,,,., ,...,.,«..,r.,e,.w,,rr.f.r ,.,« .. �a.„ ,r., r.rrn.. I ,.x ..,..r,•.<,,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,•„..1'
. i
„+.a.:...„.n»......,,4'..,..,..,.-7 ... ”.1•+,..tJt.:u.:..l .4-.,0.,+..F•t` 1:” ea,.. I
•
Minutes w
,ORB
June 22, 1976
I r
. A wall mounted sign not to exceed 12 square feet 4,' be permitted as the only sign on the site
S. 1, st perimeter of the parking area to rpanded
pin "
2' to include three additional in. eRand inter-
spec ed with evergreen bushes or ,tfees. In addition
some ergreehs could be placed along the play-
ground fence on, the east side,of the parking lot..
C• Applicant's s Pr ezatationl
"
Ms.., Roberta O'Dona oe, l ap cant, summarized the pro-
ject l and stated her greement with the staff reoammenda.-
tion.. '
Olson inquired as to theyadguehcy of a 15 ' wide two way
driveway. Staff responde ;-f hat due to the short length
of, the dri_veway and the number of spaces it serves the
15' width would be adquant, and that the addition of
landscaping would be more beneficial.
Ds Board Discussion an d
Action
•
'Cook moved and Olson seconded that the site plan be
approved with the conditions as presented by Staffs
wM -ag-was-ap d t unanimous voice vote
5.2 SDR 21-76 (Young's feral Home)
A request by Young t s :Funeral Home for design review for
proposed exteris?' remodeling of a funeral home at 11e31
SW Pacific Hwy.
A. Site Development Plaza. Review
•
1. Staff report: read by Daniels
2, Staff recommendation:
' P
Staff recommended approval of the site plan with
the following conditions:
1. All parking spaces bp 916" by 19' .
r .
2. wheel b 1 a s be
p r ovide d for
the eastern
ern
most parking space'I and those nearest the
existing buildings
3. The 3t by .3t plan ling areas in the central
parking L.`�.ng a:rea be curbed and hardy deciduous
trees, such as Norway Maple, of minimum 2"
Caliber With appropriate ground cover be
planted. .
•
•it .
,. „f,:_..v.. .u.., ,..,a...r+ ..a.,. .,.-,...J....-.r....,It.x., ..-.a.z1r._.,, ....,. .7...,.,;.....w.. r
y Minutes
DRB
June 22, 1976
4. Information regarding the direction of .igha
beams near the sign be submitted to the star .
B.33. Applicant's Presentation
Mr. Clive Kienle, architect for the applicant summarized
the project.
Mr. Young, operator of the funeral home, stated that the
"'; parking lot as it
, � � g. presently exists functions well and 'a . '
that a parking lot for funeral homes is different than
that of a shopping center in that it is a very controlled
situation and asked that the areas be allowed
parking ar,�
to remain in the way it presently exists.
C. Board Discussion Action
McMonagle stated that it appeared that wheel blocks
are necessary for those parking stalls near the building.
Hammes moved and Cook seconded to approve the site plan
with the following conditions:
1. 6” wheel blocks be provided for the parking spaces
nearest the building.
2. 3' by 3' planting areas be curbed and planted with
a hardy deciduous tree and appropriate ground cover.
3. The sin lighting be located so as not to create.`
a traffic hazard along Pacific Hwy.
Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote.
D. Architectu.al Design Review
1 . Applicant's Presentation
Mr. Kienle described the building materials and
colors and stated that the work to be done was
only on the front portion and not on the side
facing Warner St.
Cook moved and Hammes seconded for approval of the
arch i:teotual design as 'presented. Motion was
approved by unanimous voice vote.
5,3 REVIEW ZC 4-73 (Farmer's Insurance)
Review of a pro po sed s. i gi n g program for Farmer's rner 's Insurance
at Interstate 5 and Highway
217.
A. Staff report: read by Daniels, •
15 b Staff recommendation: s taf ` recommends that the
i J
H A l
I I
r
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW. 1 1 i
Site Plan Review 1
File No.
.� Architectural :., 2‘ "' "'
;:�, , Revi ew
Fee Received _1,___25,_b
Receipt -
Date Received [I (-(G_ +,
Tigard Planning CPmmission
12420 S�Y Main St. , Tigard, Or. 97223 B .
639-4171 ,
;,
_.
n
ei
4
,I a Project Ti- le "0 ► L ► Tate Filed Gil, .
.,Pro 'e c`� Address � � � ,:
�. '� �'�„�' .,t, v ..r , � ,
Tax Map No. Tax Lo t No ,
r b .A. A! w,', .? er ... * � +Y..Bt�. �..- .w.,-.«.,...w..w.+. .-+«.«w«wN ___ ,.
Address, , �a1± ► " tr ' Q.0 Telephone 4Lt .t,1-__1_L L
•
'Ownerts ,� �
s i gnature _. _ _ .___`� eone � +
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY �,,,
Proposed Use #Buldis # Units y S Fts.
: 6. . o .A + •
• Site Size Tot. Sq. '
q. "t. of Buildings
Paving Sq. fit. of g �....,.....�..� � .. .. Sq. Ft. of Landscaping � :,...�.,,.....�. �
Ax tic: paced Development Da-be
..., •F� .no.rW«.'-.rrNNwIw N� p
rwwW+�WM.Yrrwrr,Y'�w+w...N 1�NMwwr+rw..W,ww...N
Anticipated Development Phases ,,,
' .MNN' / .. ` lNwiNw.+w�+NNw„�Nrr.yM rrrww. ,rrr1w,w.{y+i+wy.Nr.� t
,r
Valuation J
�,...,.�....,N.�N.... N...,w..,.............�..�.�.�......;�N., � ,..�....,�.._N'w.,..,.,....�.,�.,:�..JN.,..,.�.. ,
i.
4
... .�.. ..N . ..W��, ��..: DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE
.� N�... .
Special Conditions - Dedications
N..:.....NW....N ,,...,
Bonding /11.
Ot .er
Final Inspection by ' Date
i•
1v• ( I / • , a s 9
,A'',''