SDR20-76 POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
,.�r .,t «r U'Z'iJ.4.,c„1,..:4f f,i::9v.,,f..ii,.lr,,,:,44d. ',{n a ,
',' l! r .S..x. 1S a.I.�}wdfueV:.A,FtKG'�.,,.Mai,td.il.•„.»nr.Vf'r+?,w..,w:,..wy,a^K�'.r..,nU»II.,eF.a'f•1,.4w,7kr»X+.-.,n„-wr4l
t
,t..,h.,....�,..n„',�,t✓s»'m:,,.rw:. ^x4.„.r+ w...t"..,. i�..,..w4..;::�..n..lurr:.,r;;r:n,.V,Y k atV rd ,da i l.✓ytl'�af,�{4r�W d!f'r t 1.i U,t, y u 4 �•,`C' {` M^r �^ ,
. I Y'i Ir 4 I V I'I t tsX y..n y In ''''4"e`�,'4 I.' '
0"'n 1' h '+ '� ,�.,�tT t II ,����\\))Y �, 1 i 1 , �' I
,f y�O�J3 1 rW 1 1.i® �,.. r. I rM1 t f.T k y,1 „,'
r I I'' ' `SPR CE 'k bAY CA :E '
` C - ( u Il ',r'.. �.. i U lr c�C �' �({� r, ..!«..rir,r.+i,ru.,.xrri. � ,
s f i a e l env ,o to i� +; ;��. E SDY t7 76 ,t; t�
,
, r.
.,.,.._,, .+...,,.-,. ... "......,_... .... ......w.f.., ,.r ..,,.....yktlltiYlMWYdIiWiltl,��
w•.1»,.� �,-.»;:t»ref,.,ay l.A.ki-.,r.,t,�II.J.;.,�,4w c..+.u:iM »,I..,.,a-r,...,,......a.ci:tiM r,•
•
•
•
i
.
i
i
,
I
I
II
a,
A
I
I k
I
{
_ r ' yr,
..;, .a .. ... ,,., .,.. a ,,.. ... .•, ... • ..
w
. �t _ •
•
.;».,, ».•..,., .«•...:..,M. ,.".:. ., .' h ... ....:: .,.,.wt,:::.. >n..: ....xa::: .,_.-...Ws:. .w,. ,.;.-,.-...v i a.._..::. ,ten +.t•. ,u:.t.«.. ,..
.. n w .. w »,w w.,..,. .. w w i! eN ,•....,..... «.. „t w. ra..;+-.e. r» .... 1., :-_..,...1•.'«....«,6.., J:ii.-„.uA..+;. a... ...... •,.. uw#..J.tw.;
Tigard Site Development g ” Plan
AND Architeetual p ign. Review Board
June 22 1976 5:0L )d m. f[
General. Telephone Building
12460 SW Main Street Tigard, Oregon
L ,
1. CALL TO O .D ER: Meeting was called to order at l 5:15 pm by
Chairman McM.ioraagie
2. ROLL LL: Present Hammes, Mc �o�� g ,•rOlson, Cook. a
Absent: Ooldbach. Staff prey: olen.
Daniels,9
3. MINUTES: Cook moved ,Ja Olson seconded that the minutes of
May �_5 1976, be
approved by ur�sxr�.mous��oa.cesvQtem The motion was
Y � � submitted.
pp y "
4. COINi'2ff ICATIONS: Daniels pretSe 'bed a letter from Mr. Joe Gerber
of Gerber Legendary Blades complimenting the DRD on their
b ' actions in regard to their review of the Gerber plant expansion
on 72nd. -- -
. DESIGN REVIEW �.
5,1 SDR 20- 76 (Day Care Center)
A request by Roberta O'Donahoe for design review for a,
proposed children's day care center at 7510 SW Spruce St.
A. Site Development Plan Review
I y P
1, Staff Report: read by Daniels.
B. The staff recommendations:
The staff recommended approval with the following
conditions:
1. A waiver of non remonstrance agreeing g
g � to ;�artl,ci
reein pate
in local improvement district for SW Spruce be filed
ov`cm.ent d•�.s�,r
with the City Recorder.
2. Concrete aprons to be constructed at grade with r
future street improvement and approved by
Washington County Public 'Worksd
3. Parking stalls be minimum. 916" in width.
4. Minimum 5' back out space for the southern most
parking stall be provided and proposed tree
locations be appropriately modified.
'ti•a
5. The entrance/de1t,vety area to be expended.
6. Appropriate ground cover and evergreen bushes or
° trees be located around the parking area.
Minutes ,p
DR�3 ,t,;
June 22, 1976
7. A wall mounted sign not to exceed 12 square feet
be permitted a$ the only sign on the site.
8. Nest perimeter of the parking area to be expanded
2' to include three additional pin oak and inter-
spersed with evergreen bushes or trees. In addition
some evergreens could be placed along the play- ti
.
ground fence on the east side
of the parking lot.
C. Applicant's Presentation
Ms. Roberta 0'Donahoe, applicant, summar ized the pro
* sect and sta.t �^
ed hey agreement with the staff recommends--
• '
tion.
Olson inquired as to the adquercy of a 15 ' wide two way q
•
Staff responded due to the short length
driveway. � a
of the driveway and the number of spaces it serves the
15 ' width would be adquant, and that the addition of
landscaping would be more beneficialu'
D. Board Discussion and Action
Cook moved and Olson seconded that the site plan be
approved with the conditions as presented by Staff.
Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote.Y
• A
5.2 SDR 21-76 (Young's Funeral Home
,
A request by Young's Funeral Home for design review for
proposed+ exterior remodeling of a funeral home at 11831
SW Pacific Hwy.
A Site Development Plan Review
1. Staff report: read by Daniels
M
• 2. Staff recommendation
i
Staff recommended approval of the site Plan wit h
the following conditions: _
:
1. All parking spaces 'be 9'6" by 19' 4
2. 6" wheel blocks be provided for the eastern n
most parking space and those n-earest the
existing buildings.
3. The ,,,)1 by 3' pla.nnln.g areas In the central
Parking � e
be curbed�t anci hardy deciduous
trees, such as Norway Maple, of minimum 2ir ., ,
caliber with appropriate grouud cover be
planted.
,
I+ .
a
rT J 4 .5
.. , ,n...w'iwl_ W..'; . . ,• ,._. •waart.,.11.,::w w,•,. ...•R...w.« .....,c.:„ 4..,,.fi V.,.xw.,.4G;s;a_,<•,.., ..i,. x i.: ...,l, .:e,.v.•..
i M
� nutc
Tune 22 1976 N \.
k
4. Information regarding the direction of lght•.
beams near the sign be submitted to the staff.
T3. Applicant's Presentation
-, Mr. Clive Kienle, architect for the applicant summarized . ' _./
the o h e Pr �
Mr. Young, operator of the funeral home, stated that the r3
parking lot as lot presently exists functions well and
h parking lot for funeral homes is different than
that of a shopping center in that it is a very controlled '
situation and asked that the parking areas be allowed
• i-t -�
to remain • the way presently exists.
•
C. Board Discussion Action
�r wheel blocks •
r7cr�onagle stated that �.-� appeared that wk�ee ��.
are necessary for those parking stalls near the building.
Hammes moved and Cook seconded to approve the site plan
with the following conditions:
1. 6'f wheel blocks be provided for the parking spaces
•
P, nearest the building.
2. 3' by 3' planting areas be curbed and planted with
a hardy deciduous tree and appropriate ground cover. s i r
The sign lighting be located so as not to create ;
a traffic hazard along Pacific Hwy. y
Motion m : was approved by` un.animau.s voice vote.,
D. Architectual Design Review Vii'
1e Applicant's Presentation
o
n
materials and
� building ter'd,one wdS
Mr. Kienle described the b�.ild�.n ma
colors and stated that the work to be
•
only on the front Portion and not on the side
facing Warner St.
Cook moved and Hammes seconded for approval of the
a architectual design. a,. presented.reSented, No'tibn was
approved by unanimous voice vote.
' 5,'3 REVIEV lC 4-7 (Varrner's Insuretnc e)
Review of proposed slgin.g program for r ' insurance
a propo'�' armer s
at Interstate 5 and Highway 217.
A, Staff report gj= read by Daniels
Staff r'ecomlunendatior staff recommends that the
I �!
I I'
♦Iv '
u.
.
r
1 ��n� ,y 1
• I --..J» ..4 ...u.-I-.S_lip.— ea. .,4a f...e-,.nw w_H-A 10.#. ».F.o.h1:Y_. ,1 !•
Page
Minutes
I
June 22, 1976 t
I I.
signing program be approved as submitted bri teed as it is ,
in compliance with the general and program approved
on September 9, 1974.
C. Applicant's Presentation I _
� •
Bill Flnley� representing Bryon Ferris Design agents
•
Y
4 for Farmer's Insurance group, presented the material
and showed pictures of the sign and described the 1
ratio n �e
for this'
s particular s�_ .�
��.d
exhibited a
y �
map showing the p 0
proposed locations
for sign. I
Olson inquired_as to the length of time the leasing {r'
sign would remain main. sign. Finley, responsed
the sign would be removed o�zbth,re on .Leasing rep, ansed. r;
entire �, upon of ��he
park and that the parent sign would be r es tainedo
D. Boar Discussion Action n
I ,
Olson moved and Cook seconded to approve the planning
program as submitted with a modification that the
leasing sign be reduced in width so as to provide a
611 border along the sides of s �n,$ The motion was
� g I '
approved by a unanimous voice' . o ' '
pp Y v a.ce t tetr
6. OT. ►P L BUSINESS: Mr.
Larry Bissett, resident, approached the
board and encouraged the board to be stricter in their design
review in that many times it assists in those developers s
liveable
interested S
in doing a good job and will result in a more liveable
environment in T,.igard •;
Chairman McMonagle asked if signs were under review of the ,r ;
Design Review Board. Daniels stated that Section 18.58.030
of Tigard Municipal Code requires applicants to submit a
` • of signs and in that signs are '
showing a
site. Lan. sho��r�.n. a location o I a
part of the site 's architect would fall their plan gn re
Bolen explained th all uta•der ,� r �,e�rie�,r,
�+ e history of the ordinance creating the
M
DRB and that review of signs was a point of contention during 4
that discussion and most of the language considering signing
was removed, but Staff would inquire from the City Attorney
whether signs were subject to DR,B.
I I
7e ADJOU NT: There being no further business the meeting was
adjourned at 7bOO p.m,
g
I I
....,., .,...0 ten..•.. .v...vo,
I
I � I , •1 • ...w. .r w. .•s.rcYw W, h J I I I I
I • I
WO/MONIfittilll IIIlir
r` •1Y
,.,....._ i !1. .-.......,.A ,.., Y!,».....,.r.. .,xr, .«:.'. »......,.. »....:....,... .'....+:.......L.,...x.i:.+.,......«..M:+.,.,dk+—w.,....w:,..,.,.i.....,....«::..Alw...1».,._,...-r::...b.....s.::-.» 1«<.n»u,r:.:r41C».r.«•.l..N w.3+tl:. ,..s..11...
STAFF REPORT .
1 Tigard Site Development Plan & Architectural Design Review Board
' 1 I
,Jun 22, 1976
Agenda 5.1
S DR 20-76
r.. Re m
Request: Site Development t
�. p
er. Plan
- Review of a Proposed Childrens Day Care Center
Location. 7310 S. W. Spruce S'tree-E
•
Applicant: Roberta 0 Donahue
• BASIC FACTS:
1. The site is designated U.� Low {i
' ban L w Density Residential" on the '
g
' Tigard Communitz Plan and zoned "R-7 Single Family Resident,lal". '.
. (CO 6--76) for a Day
• ��'� '' A Conditional Use Permit Care Center was
approved by the Planning Commission on February 17, 19?6, with
the following conditions
•
A. Site Development Plan be subject to Design Review Board
Approval. `.
. B. A waiver remonstrance,
agreeing to
participate in a
Local
1,',
Improvement District for S. W. Spruce Street be filed with
the City Recorder.
3. T h e surrounding land use consists of the Fr ed Meyer
store and
parking lot to the south and east with single family residences
across Spruce Street and a vacant lot to the west, An insurance
agency is located ,in a house at the N.E. corner of 72nd and
Sd W. spruce Street.
4, S. W. Spruce Street is an unimproved street with a 80' right-of
way Rec -
.
• ent�.y an X30+ unit apartment building was given.., Design
Review Approval by Washington County at S W. 78th and S. W.
Spruce. A condition of that approval was for improvement of
p from S. W. 78th to S. W. 72nd Avenue. A (street
�r• rove nt co
S � W Spruce �n sent covenant _
c vene.n-L has recently been mailed to the
applicant and must be satisfied prior to issuance of occupancy
permit.
FINDINGS
1: The Site Plan shows six 9' 20' parking stalls whereas the code
equres a minimum of 9' .6" width:
2. N L backout space e is Provided for the southernmost (tap of
drawing) parking space.
•
• d
I If
I' J
i
r
I I
4•
1 ,
r
i1
. J x . . . I.. 4'4-.i..m nN# qIn L.S,. alwi ....GJI
r447�+J44t E`
m4E444.4 «.H,-., w..w.,..4M.,it
Staff Report
SDP & .1,1)R33
Page 2 j
3. The number of spaces appears adequate especially with provision ,,'
for the through drive for pickup and delivery.
4. The driveway for pickup and delivery is about 10' wide. Concern:
does arise about the negotiability of entering that drive from
' the street.
5. Bar:kdust only is shown for the 2' strip along the parking area
away from the play area. These areas have a tendency for neg-
lect and the addition of ground lessens that appearance. Also,'
no groundcover is shown for the remainder of the parking area
perimeter l
�
\\; / 6. The play area is well contained with a fence and concrete wall.
7 No information was submitted for either the play area surface
or play equipment. ;
Se No provision was made for allowing a sign during the Conditional f
use process and advertising signs are prohibited in the f R- zo e ;.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
i iStaff recommends a pproval with the following conditions:;.
,
1. A waiver o
waiver of remonstrance agreeing` to participate in a Local
Improvement District for S. W. Spruce Street be filed with
he d
the Recorder..
y
2. Concrete aprons to be constructed at ;grade with future street
/ improvement and approved by Washington County Public Worts.
r e
3 Parking stalls be a minimum 9 t61, in width. '
I4, Minimum 51' backout space for the southernmost parking stall
- be Provided and proposed tree locations to be apprcpra-tel.y
modified.
5. Th
The entrance area t o the xc�u dol�ver ax ea e
ax ed
.
C. Appropriate te ground cover and evergreen bushes
or trees be
located 'around the parking area.
7. A walk mounted sign not to exceed 12' be permitted as the
y
0�1l„ sign
on the site.
- . • •r•. ■n4..ra.:..::.-L..o... ,.L,w„dl..d.,.,l,r ..r..un..f,.4�...t,.a mod._..,..«, ..w+x...—'••f: r.s-ltw,..
f' .� k,.lw., ...•t. .-w.l,.,,.wx!'N..,4urf�aLlv.n..�%.�J.Ya,...ty.4'.
1 I
Staff Report
SDP & ADFtB
Page 3
r ,
• I
8. West perimeter of parking area to be expanded 2 feet and to
include 3 additional pin oak and interspersed by evergreen
bushes or trees. In addition, some evergreens could be
placed along the playground fence on the east side of the
parking lot.
•
r,.
•
{
r n
. l
�. ..-i-n..-4444,.,, 1, -.(.« _ .r�>. rw. w7.4..,,«...J..W.1.7.,t:r.-.au..,.- -n..w.l.. M .-../,4�.s131F.rv.:..,..1�I111.a1':� ..,h,.aJ4'�.%64.4,1-7-,0.....,(-.�,.,:.I,,t4+ ..Fw,« n�1w1u ..».+:...t7.+.4.«. .GYM-.,.�s Iw%.w r' ',
. ' Project Ta..t1e �, - Ca-a__: [. • 0::i ce F ,1,rr` ,1, .;: ' ■
.. Owner/Developer '� D nJ
j
Address ..... ..,�..O .,. :. .,. 4 >..: ;. . cz„ Tel phone ., l,C .,..
4414* ..••v ....bb .w IM1.Y.Y.,•.. w1.,1i.•r1•.1.6.1,.4...r • ,
r1..�wv ..w w4k..k�•.W1w6,n 1.441.., +.. •
•
De s a. . n e .., �,.w..... 4 . I r.,, Iw �., � .
M or� +,.uMNYr.,AwM.,4w4wri4N.v,M.K-fin nwr.wwn...�wnwJw ��, ,�I.4u,.M wo.r,u,WN r ueN,ww,.Y..wYr .a ,.1�.+a.«1rWw�1wM 7 _
,4 !• 4
Drw iF" "t TP' ' D ,1 OF' PFtllPCF4T`�
w,...,,M++w...,__ _,mwkbPM1.+?TV7wwar 61161+......11,,......„,l...„.......Pmw:?v..w.
P F CJ�(�c2,tea r9 ci L s L f,... t,I.. .4„114." f.��,,', ,,.1)'!' 1,�"r):R. + '(I e . �I, ,,,t,/., .., c t L..,n�w , ,,
nn,.rrrv�l,vJr«wr+h^r,•rv,..wrU,uJ,+...,.+�ty.!Ma.wu-MA.vwrw4,+ru..w. ww,r(�i.w,.«•.X.+1+.1u+w.,d..N%Y.wdnhwlM.,raLSw+.a.11,�p,,«hKw.KYrisher..w,N..uu....-M�.r.rn..wllwllww.vy+w.nwhrc.A.wAwkl.,w16,17 YL 0611•1101.11:9dwW4••.•••••.....FUU.••••.,Jar i1.r4...n•.wawwww,JaNwn'•y,-,+ X,
0 Y+«.MwM 4 wrl41.466 lw1YL440...kM.w++.a.1.16 u+.u."ywr.Y+ .a.MwbNWY.ew...4•wbYiwur•N.wY.ii.4wfar.4u16i 6.40.16/4.66 YWwI+,w„,./.4.+sw' a+N+«MVWW.1,1466 A.wNf•46,4wnF'.1.W.1. 1i.INvt1WUW64661swAYrMU..0.10.4141•rw.lwreunwFwtfw"uU1.D•.� •
L
WY44t w. —MS....66, 'MV--WWM4 NN.M1'wdraM•rW.N.id1MiMW.4116461(-M.WMw601*4,1/W',.WiW.M4 00.44/4NIM40.•L. KW,bss,A..w.,...44.44N. .,....IRa+WJW.444 •k 411•xAHN•n1YMiNlM4.4N,..WO16•1.444••M.4uLLWMM1MW.M..v1.'••••F•'••.‘64•
1•, 1m466.w'M+wTwfwwlsi..w.66•4+4 6666.wM6w+.v16.•61W66164,..•a+ww'.+•,.,.••11•+6.4.•w.•••X.•n•WMm.rub.Ww•MwNk«616w4441.11••••••46 VAwWNS1,11.akM-th.w4:«1104 1e-yM1YiYUWL4aM'64•Y••4.4i1.1..::Y4t4.YNhi e;4.11d7 441W11411164111.1•:.11114,:01•164414111,1161.4466 ':J1)Ax,MwyJl:p'MN4a...5
Y
••..•..•.m•...w.•••14.411.rww,616...M•66.41.46•uM��•oW et••yw.u.w++ea•+w;«6111..•1144..n.164. 411••:6.4112.616 4.44,Fi.466614 wawu:+6.6.1:64166/•.O S.MWUi.41.,/.6.a.•.ea;+wnlW0,16ti,+IM110111.. .16160.6.MYMYMwWr••dki441i66.14x.1146.4 4.4.4ww.ww.4.w.4.gF4.00.0,.....4 L
t
' Site Size {'x i',1 ee „ £y ti ,; 411:-x+ a �, �.(-g wp. 1:' C X M�1 ! .w' J •I 5 r 4 � G •l '• � ^•4 a
, j'
1 1 , r �«w,4•4•.wi.a,al,Mww.l>f4«r•ww1,a..ww.msWw•.w•uW1 t „ ''w • '' µ '•• ,wuwn»•,,,4 w+NU.nah.rJautwv.Vw..4�mu.a':
w«rn
`
SJ' q n Frt of Pav�.rig GiS� S .1:,,. rw .w ,, g w, , ,n
P 4 (..1i.'{11,1'' 4.1 y'! Fr.N:11.,11••••+11 -0} I 6.6.66.1.6.66...1-1,4.............i
• •.r+..uKwy,.w"',.w.uw.4.«•.r.•rl+.:.v V
prita.cipra-,ed Development Date TQ , :1> 1tR ".,,(,JD,E.,..,..1.1_Li ,' 1 ""t., . ',t ..S.: -
' Anticipated Deveioprnrent Ph e.. �� I
,,.x•.,.....wa..... ...•.•,,w.wvw.wum ellw,wo.•..116+...uMcw«.„,,...n.......—.,..n.w1...... .r 4rw•......awlwv,....c.„..,. ......ww.yr..mrw"..mwro..rr
Valuation
• ...... ww 9011∎1.Mg1�.rrw. �f11G.+Np/14.w..t•4-,4wv.re•66666,•66..w4.4.w.•e.:T.+«0.6 6,6.461 64.6.166 11wv4Yr MUw'w.Y.1H•10•+.Y..n4ww.rrd.r4.wnMe064164tk 611.447.606Iawg•M6 • ''
vim'
DO NOT WRITE DEI.,.OU THIS LWINr J�,.
...t....+w..ws4•r+.nrir .r. uanw4.v„w.wwwlriu4..rmJ�warr4..wwb.wa4.:.w•wa1..4wv4t+.nw.ew^w.+v •w•zr+.v4+ fw•+rr41.14w...rt.nr.wIl
1
Special Conditions - Dedications
4•a..,..i.o.•a..row...M66,106>11411641,.14awW1.14.0 1w4«4u.4,..++..1.tw...66.0.46•1141..v,.-:: ....w4anon.na.w.lvn+ '
BCS ri ding a e Mw.w4•w„+Wwwn•r+osrwm.wma4n ww.u 6646 rnsw+orsde u 1 4�Yw.•wAr.v+nvn..r.v Ya4..rwr.4•.• -
)tl1e
• h"O4.W...W—.,...N.'.!•.4M.+•+..,...,,.„.....„_.JI.MWKW4FI.K'..NbWwnaK6Mwk .kIM•M. ...L4••T.i4.,....4..WY!M+..4wM1.„-..,,.,, ,�,
YW.'....w.F1..k.N•OWuM•1•#Mari.,W!M�1
Final Inapeation b1. t3y Date
pu 11��.1,w1tl..••1,1.1666,y11444�..y.p4..d444r.1iy4M.PwYmNq•M1M11W:t4•.Fw.Y.1 116..Mwv.r.•11Mw..Jr4M,MMIM1w'.Mn Y..N�+..rr1•nV.•rtY1w�..µ.p..IK.jw1
r
. . , , , e; 0....2 **-2..,C.),,,,,---I: e.',...
1,-
}
11
•
•
,1
W,
. ' Ik
' L
�4•m