SDR10-76 POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
[Page Too Large for OCR Processing]
';4 i' Ir,rau^:..t.,•uar.u4, •Yan.•W.1.i'ali.» 4'.."4G.4-sre.wa.ats-..;.,.M:.11.,.•,o4,:u,.:«.„,',4...,..,,....:..44.r.,,,,Ji,.ri.,.e;.J.2....;',.},4.',A...,.rrsc:i...!'.Y.i,u.,:'40,,ar::M:[u^h,
r' .+-.M1'A4.r ,1.A6':.5,...rIG"•u.a.iFr.f`:..:.�r.'rn�u..,vril.._..a..r rtr...�...w.F.r4....>'-.nrr..YL{
` ' U`� t' r f r 1
•
1 ° t:ia r 400 ,GI EA. WESTERN Li IdA31 � ,
'
;, Speviniert Reve (4,D 0- 6 •
).
a
t 'y� 11440 S T edemarY
1
, , 1 , � 0 u a W� tlillk�iM
:...:... It .w..x..., I .:.l-. ....ri.. , i........:.�. .Frr ,. 04v ,.t, vd ..wn ' )n
•
..re'
jff .,,
e'
•
P
t
r
9 yy''
• b4°
q f ,
•
i
•
• •
•
a
•
•
y 1
I
•
, r
. .
r
,
I I
e
i
Dy 1 . .,r � ..I.I.r ur.we..rnu.AM ae..f.l..,.:...:� �e,,,,i .. .,, .. .�.. ..,• r.,.r ..... .., r i,. ,,,,,,,,,,,, , r,,, r. ,i, r{
AI', f j .I Q ..I'.. ,'!.
n ?+
. .
. A
' ..r. ..4' .. .. ,✓..Y .. �.,.... w. -s d.:;..,�.... 1. .. .,. 1.. e.l a. N..- .� .[ .';1.,i•.J.....Lx ..r. ..:I. .„1,�„ «..r.-. ..A,.. .. ,.,�, T•. .w., A..;.
P
•
May
l? ,
,
. 1 40 �W Ti.edern�'
° Tigard* fl '
w Gent omen
arc : meet to . . , ' c s c request '
of a proposed loading
doc . en L,osut e at u440, SW Tiedeman. and rov,r,
z bm 'r s.ia ;, wao approved* .
Y
. .. additional Information. . s s ;c e
r
: » ; .
}
I
I
. .
•
i
I
.
i
. . . I . i '''" . '
f„ • " . n .
• I.... ._ ..r a...,i.,._. ,,.. a.R:_ _ ... ... ... .1+.. 1 •t...--1....., ....1.-.......1.-u.•.........-A- «. .. .,. 1 ......s. ..r.x.•...,111-a..u..,'1.,,-14•r ., ...•,..t.l...•.,..v.f 3.«:.L..•.«....-..-..v-.;._a:i.u......,....1.+....«..rl l.... L.......L. .«.....uw,u a.a.i,s. .aa....,L•it •e...r..1.....N.... •1
MINUTES
Tigard Site Development Plan & kichitectural Design Review Board
May 11, 1976 5:00 p.m. y
General Telephone Building �.
12460 SW Main St. , Tigard, Or'e'gon,
1. CALL TO ORDER: Meeting called to order by Chairman McMonagle
at 5:10 p,am•
2. ROLL CALL: Present: McMonagle., Hammes, Olson, Cock, Goldbach;
staff: Daniels, Bolen, Laws
3. APPROVAL OF :MINUTES Minutes of 4/27/76 were approved as submitted, •
- 4. COMMUNICATIONS: None.
5. DESIGN REVIEW:
5.1 SD R
14-76 (Ray
Martin & Bill Walker)
A request for design review of a proposed 4 plex. subdivision
at 124th & Walnut.
A. Site Design Review
..2%
.r� s
1. Staff f Re ao> t a • ead by Daniels.
2; Staff Recommendation: Approval with following
conditions:
1) Additional landscape screening be provided
adjacent the buildings abutting the residential
` 1
zone.
2) The bank on- SW Walnut be sloped to provide a more
even transition with the grade level of the ,
project and planted, with 'a suitable groundcover
such as ivy :and such plan being submitted to
staff for approval.
anti" r� adjacent the entrance drive
ti 3) The juniper p11 . �., gs ,�
be wiltoni -type.
4) Two street--lights be placed on the ,,_sting
utility poles on Walnut and on both;, sides of the 1 /
entrance drive.
5) Parking stalls� to be 1 r by ar
w!, -h bumper rails.
,
6) A concrete sidewalk to bo placed adjacent to
SW 124th and an asphalt path from its terminus
at Walnut to the entrance drive on Walnut,
7) Backing space bo provided at the northern most
parking stall 'adjacent building 4.
I I,
I•
I I �
•
( o n a
....._-...... ..n« ..... ........,;.{;,....+:1.. .. .«h.wA...n.....i.....sir lJ.H..u..--.,—.,...rws.i....r...::f.---Y._w. '
. aw ,
page 2
ORB Minutes
5./1L/76
r
8) Access drive to be widened to 30 ft. 1.
9) Any sign placed on the site to be utilized for ' .
identifying the project be no larger than 16 sq.
• ftr and subject to site design review.
t
10) Utility service to buildings shall be underground. .
11) Patio enclosures shall extend perpendicular
;,t", { from the building g bein g of the same length as
the fences ploposed to partially enclose the
patios.
Daniels responded to a question from Cook that the
sidewalks will be located as to continue the location
of the existing sidewalk with a row of street trees
between the sidewalk and the curb.
3. Applicant's Presentation
Ray Martin stated that he agreed with the staff
recommendations and that more pine trees can be ;;
placed adjacent to the houses between his develop-- r'
ment and t h e ad jacent subdivision on the north.
Tie asked that the drive be narrowed in order to save
4 trees existing on the site.
4, Board Discussion and Action
o Cook moved and Hammes second to approve the
site design plan with staff conditions, changing
` ' ;�� condition 11 to apply only to buildings 2 & 3
and to permit a 28 ft. p
curb cut in order to ;re-
serve the large cherry tree at that point.
v
/ B. Architectural Review
I, / I. Applicrint l s Presentation
//1
Mr. Ray Martin presented d t h e building materials
and colors to be used in the project.
i /, ;;
l i 2. Commission Discussion and Action
I
I ,, 0 !
o Cook inured about the grades of the ."k�u;�.lc�.�7..�.,�;�
o Martin ;L'esponded, that all would be close to ..
existing grade with a berm put up against the
foundation o building 4.
�
the presentation is lacking in that it was not
well prepared.
6 .� �, , r . . : 1 ARINOMMIIIIROIMIRWOMMINININNOMI!,
• ✓,,., n. . ,.., .., .,.. . ._, _.. .. ,, n i e+,. . .«._.... ....,...11.,_...^.JU.^u..:4J;.JI:..,'.....». ..«...- ...n...,....«.........!-.,..,..... .,._.....s.,.v..a,...,»m.r ....,..,.++u.L-.,...,.f...............l L n.....t».,.,;;t.,,..+..,...aa:.A'r..l.4•f,.,.;.t......J...: ..A...1.,...i14,.:I:--....,.:i..».-n.:,Wn.a'J,i. ' .
\,
page 3 kf
• , .DRB Minutes
5/11/76
i
��` " o Hammes moved and 'Go ldbach second that the
w architectural design be approved +a(,
(IP• — passed by majority. voice vote with
o Motion' pass �' 1'�
,_ i /_. Olson and Cook dissenting. '
1
5.2 LINCOLNWOO.D OFFICE PARK
•
A
' A request to place an 18 sq. ft. wall sign at Lincolnwood {'
Office Park (SW 72nd and SW Hampton St. )
�' Y I � read y r �
.� A. Staff Report: read. by Daniels.
B. Staff Recommendation: ' Approval
� r � �ntation: I �,
.
C. Applicant's Press
. Mr. Dave Dou Lh;I a manag er ofLnr olnwoo
Lincolnwood Office Park
f
summarized the request. .
D. Board Discussion and Action:
_`"~ o Cook said he found the graphic presentation to be
inadequate for review purposes.
f
•• o Cook moved and Olson second to approve the request.
o Motion ap- rove d by unanimous voice vote. 1
5.3 SDR 10-76 (Great Western Chemical) 1
. Review of a proposed dock enclosure at 11440 SW Tiec/Leman. )
•n A. Staff Report;, read by Daniels.
. B. Staff Recommendation Approval. ', I.
•- C. Applicant's Presentation: Applicant was not present
D. Board Discussion and Action
i I o McMonagle asked if the
dock w s presently
covered.
1
.44 r,/
t(1', .. o Daniels responded that the request is to enclose ' ./
� the existing open dock area. i
'( ''' /,�' o Olison moved and Goldbach second to appr;;�ve the requ.es"
■
it o Motion app'roved by unanimous voice vot ;s7., fr
il
o Olson asked that staff notify applicants of meetings.
I j
P. I'
f•
Yi
4' 7 ., . - ^ - ........,..-... «.....r.r a»n w.+-.... l•
l a /
page
' DRB Minutes s
' °. �. 5/11 /76
" o Daniels responded that the applicant had been
notified at the time of submission when this item
r
would appear on the agenda.
5.4 SDH. 11-76 (Gerber Legendary Blades)
A An expansion of an office building at 14200 SW 72nd Ave .
A. Staff Report: read by Bolen. 714
B. Staff' Recommerdd-tion: Approval with following conditions: '
1. Plan be revised to include additional landscaping
in tho' i`o11owing areas: - ,
...7.,' , either the entrance nc e d r'
a) on i-ther side of -the a drive (as a ,
suggestion, evergreen trees such as cedar could
be placed along the drive from the pond adjacent
�; .. the freeway to the west property line) .
. b) Landscaped islands between the entrance drive
, and the parking lot can be considerably en-
larged with no adverse effect on vehicular
circulation.
c) A 10 ft. landscaped strip, to include evergreen
and deciduous trees, be placed along the west
` property line
AA
d) Evergreen shrubbery to be included on the north
1 ' property line.
% L ,
2. Trees specified on the plan should be a minimum
sz e of 2,tt caliper
`
G F , / ....
3. Final landscape plan be submitted to planning dept.. for approval.
M1. ., 4. Irrigation plan be submitted to staff for approval. •
,' _: 0 MoMonagle stated that compact parking spaces, although ` '
�r,. . . iriade'quete in area according to code requirements,
�; I� are spaces that are provided in ',excess of the mi.x�imum.
'. required and may be needed.
a Bolen responded that the recommendation to elimir elte a ;I
these spaces was based on the need to increase t ,;, ,'
• landscaping provided :gin the site 'which appeers to
have suffered due to placing the maximum number of ,
parking spaces on the site,
r h
• V _ ...,.f•..-. .. .'.r i......•._,..ri....w.......w...n.,..,._.....,.w,,...,w,,..w._....,....:ti..,...i.,l_r,.!,t,;..a' _,..r..»-..,,...,,._,.,...- ,.,,i.,...,....w.:i..,+...,..,.,.,+,.w...............+.,..-.:,i,_._,..._,,..w4:»,,;...-........i..,..'..:...e45»ai,:,.,'4,.r- aH...,,,,...!.,.f:w.:,i.H.«,J.lrJ,lw...,.H.,..,::.:....
page
b Minutes
RB Mih. es ..
5/11/76
C. Applicant's Presentation:
ilY
o Mr. Anderson, contractor for the project, stated
that Gerber Blades presently has 23% landscaping
/ on the site and that the need had arisen to provide
for expansion of the plant. In order to do th...s, "
they needed the maximum number of parking spaces for
their employees or they would b e required to � a
ve�w �
7
• t)�.� near future. ,
1 o ; Mr. Krause, architect for the applicant, stated • '
q that the number of perking spaces provided were the
maximum allowed on the site and were needed because
�� of overlapping shift changes which require as many . ft
parking spaces as possible to accommodate approxi-
rnately 100 employees on each shift.
a: ;Boien stated that by using 45° parking spaces y 16' .
=extra would be created, -thus providing for the 10'
J aldsco.pe setback between this property and the site
- to the west.
err l.,�•' o Bolen stated that the need for the 10 t �.
,. buffer
strip •was to allow for design flexibility' on the 4
parcel to the. south said not preclude the develop- ' a
ment options of the adjacent parcel. '
•
7 •
o Mr. Anderson stated that a 6 ft. buffer r could be pro- '
vided on the west side.
o .'Bolen graphically illustrated how the landscape
� plantings at the south end of the parking rows could
be expanded so as to give more direction of the
:driving aisles.
. 4 o The contractor stated that they would be willing toi"
plant the area west of where the stream turns south
. - along the south property line with adequate, ground-
, cover and evergreen trees.
o Cook moved and Olson second thaat the site design be
approved with staff conditions, and the additional
requirement ��of an irrigation ',plan to be submitted
to staff.
o Motion approved by unanimous
voice vote.
B. Architectural Review
•
r a Applicant's Presentation
4
Mr. Krause stated t
ha
t
rr
i• /
tt.
• f
r`r
9 ,
Jl ... ._ .. -t , .+,:...,w,...,..._.i, w..,..i,i.... a ii,_M..... »......,..e., .....w4..1. ..a......._..e.y.:._,....,,. ....,.,w...Jt...;.:i=�f,.... ...,A'-r[,,:,1,..'6.a.n... �...,,,,,M..,....«v.:_",... 1.-.,,....;.«...:'.....a. ..,.,...,, ,
page, 6
DRB Minutes /
r
5/J 1/75
,
-. the same building materials as used in the parent H;
building would also be used in the addition. i'`,
a,: Board Discussion and Action
o'� Olson moved and Hammes second to approve the
al design n a
� � � � � � �� � � � , � � architec�L-u,�;,a° ' g s submitted. � I�- �'
o Motion approved by unanimous voice vote
e. 5.5 Review of a Proposed Amendment to Approve Plans
for a 50 i
Unit
Apartment Building at `SW' Scholls Perry Rd. at Spring- .
wood Dr. in the E1ewood. Planned Development, deleting a
Tennis Courts and Reconstructing tho Old Water Tower. . .
A. Staff Report: oral report given by Bolen who summarized ,
f past or previous approval. ,.
B. Applicants Presentation.
oMr4 J. B. Bishop, architect for the project, stated 1
... „`.that since the initial Board approval, his company 1
--shad been approached by Wash. Co. Historical Society I
in an attempt to preserve the existing old water
tower on the site. Their findings were that . '
structurally the water tower was sound and that it
could be used for p���ol equipment storage, ala�xi�dro- }
.. ma•�� or a small me e�tin g room, �� both the wa. er E
- tower and the swimming pool were maintained) there ;.
would not be enough room for the tennis courts and
- their, requeet is that the requirement of the tennis i
courts be eliminated.' Also the swimming pool would , ,
need to be relocated. ,
Mr. Bishop submitted a site plan showing the proposed
changes. ;; ,
•fin.
o -Staff questioned the provision being made for garden
_area and, although the idea is to be applauded, if
not utilized, the potential for this site to be
". ,.., turned into a child 'en's play area should be investi�-
_,. gated or should be provided for. If the garden ,area
is not used it si° ould' be planted in sod. ,;
C. Staff Recommendation: Approval of the changes `and, if
. the. garden area doesn't work out it be plated in
r, , If the garden area is provided, it be so
sod.'
identified. , A '10 ft. easement along Scholls Perry I.
Rd be provided.
D. Board Discussion and Action
h
9 /
1111111111111 91111111111111111111111111111111MINENIMMENER
DRMinut e s
5/1.x./76
o Cook moved and Go14b
'' ach second to 'approve. the site .
plan with a final plan being submitted to staff for
approval showing the changes of deleting the tennis
courts, relocating the pool and delineation of the
garden area, plus :4„,.l0 ft. easement be provided along
Scholl; Ferry Rd.
j
o Motion approved by unanimous° voice vote.
6. OTHER BUSINESS
•
Bolen stated that since the agenda had been sent out, staff
had been approached by Gevurtz Furniture Co. to add this` item
r to the agenda.
A. Staff Report: Oral staff report given by Bolen.
B. Applicant's Presentation: _ •
Mr. Bob Pershing of Oregon "` ign Co. showed exhibits of
locations and types of sign s they would like to have on
l,c the site
. �f
McMonagle stated that he felt the purpose of a ''sign, was to j
identify the location and not to distract from drivers
attention along the freeway and that the signing program,
as proposed, could be too large.
•
Hammes stated that he didn't feel the sign along the freeway
was out of proportion and be would prefer to see option ''B"
/ , along the freeway with a 2 ' to 3' high planted berm to cut ,
down the visual impact of the height of the sign.
Goldbach stated that either option "A" or nEtr along the
freeway could be provided,—but that instead it be at the
scale shown for option. "C":73-
McMonag l e concurred with Goldbach's rec inmendation and
asked that a 6 ft. high landscaped berm be 'provided.
Cook concurred. w. •
•
C. Board, Discussion and Action
and Cook second that an adequate landscape '
o Hammes moved �.nd n
mound be provided under option "1,� ; that the location��
of the freeway sign be moved to its original location
as shown on the 'site plan; that the landscaping be sub-
i tutted for final staff approval.
o Motion approved by unanimous voice vote.
7. ADdoURMENT. Meeting adjourned at about � � +C p.m..
,/AID ®A111111 .11[ f
.�',..+,w ..,....I..,er a...l,N, .r lla....-.-.w-.rn_..o;....a,.,., r...„.s:..�_-._...,.....L:..,,...,r_1ew.0 r.5w.„1n;c,.,;U..."....-....I,:..,...�..w l...ux wul.,.u.,:.au+._:,.,:::.;�cu.s.. ....cW.,.. ..,.4,3-4..1 rw IL-a-,.i .d.yt.'-;c..,..H,:a l.,,„„,...i;a m,,,.ut»:.�,+uc.aa✓r,w::m.n.:rH,.."
STAFF REPORT •
Tigard Site Development & Architectural Review Boat.'
May 11, 1976
5.3 SDR 10-76 (Great Western. Chemical) '
e .j Review of a proposed loading dock enclosure at 11440 S.W. Tiedemarz.
BASIC FACTS .�
/ r, 1. This area is designated as "General Industrial" on the Tigard,
Comprehensive Plan and zoned "M-4, Industrial Park".
FINDINGS
1. The applicant has requested approval for enclosing an existing
4800 square foot covered loading dock at 11440 S.W. Tiedeman,
2. The exterior walls are unfinished concrete with three railroad
loading docks on the west side.
3. The proposed building material is 26 galvanized prefinished sheet
ro metal' siding (Gray-Green).
4. The enclosure does not require structural expansion, bf the building.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval.
I j
A
i
I ,
I y+
ur
i f
4 •" '
. .a..... 1....,.4«. a�t::tnr.1..?.LM w:..,lu,,,.w,.....-:w41.44.,»..,.:.w...,,..:..;..........lnx. .,....,....,,....,,.HG«,fi.......,,,� ,•
,.•..., ,,. .»1,..,...,.<.e.1,.,1...._.I'...w_..::.�:...wua'.I.e.,, .x t..,.....-3xx.:rn�..Y'++rw.•.tw.4.a.,,::an:...I....../,..I.1LM.,.i..:....... ...........:Y.,.J.-,...,..,u,.l.,1C:,,..w.wn:..-.:»,...,....I...,.:i)w. a i�-,.f r ,•
JI •
' • SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND DESIGN fEUT '". ;
0 Site Plan RRrz1.»,sw ', .
D T\rchil ectux.ai, review
�
, APPLICATION 4 , ,f1
w
, ry �.a n1
ri j{. r���... ..„..Wlµ.......ull.,,.il.....„,......,,„,...w1.....,„,,,•11....M--1?°!'-,- 0 v
1 a ,.�r. w.Wwwr..n..rwWrw...•w•Ww.M.M.w, / (••/
COMMISSION ,- h C;C i �.�Gal �a.wY.w..w......w�.w,.r.,a...a 1,
12420 CAW,, Main Street s Tigard, Orejon 97223 Hy , . . .-�
, 44..4..w*tlwF44.......................w...1..wn w•w:.......uwlr w.w.............. f'
cEOc)' QY) 1OSLd i
o "�C Tx4 :.0 + '1j�,� ..F � / pat r: .: r 1 ! i'" ` .
ILIw .�3r.n� 5. .�•4••. .wM..4...1,......w „•.Iw..... ....o.ru+.n.�s.o.a..r.•.w....v..4 •
'
, �wrie /Deva%o er . �'! " M Cy, ':G'L�. �
a. ..
r.wMwwwn• w..::.wn..wwnwlizw.r•auw.rwl a+wnr+w.ol+.nwrnaa.o.rn+.q.ww..v+ wnw4
I. . \ '
Address r)t1 �g .,„..-,. J'�PPoI•.' ` 91'vIba�rr� (2„,,:""` , .,. ' .
V.•�wl,,✓. 4rYMnw71rF �...•.n. rl ' +mu.Cr7.+R..1144'44w1.1......144.,wwWnawni.1.4..1.44.1.4.4 �I a.4. ,rwr. a•, 4.4.14 1.1....4nMl.waui.Y....rr.«_.......441
d [ 5-*: T r,I1 C'R..Th a r, ' ?y _671 6 4 ,
D e n 9 r ,n.)f- j +ir.p w l,nw.w.r.„.; t ��. w.t� q.h4 x,.................4.1.44 . 1 ........p:uw..4�I,vr.ww..rw.n.w rw.Y4:...u.w.•w•..iI.,M47a4.w.RM....oM
4el...n,.^.....ri4.WwwuurF U,,...„ra,M04,4,-...44rIw..t... .....,W;„.....aw..tM l a.....•aw.e .
y
I".r L,t'J�J W.'t 3 d' 1,1 t.'1'k:i 1 .j T3:,r.Gu .x,r.r `.S w✓ ,:i. I.) .J t f 1. w ,-' 4-..6.,.
..+..'9n. ...MM............I... w4, ...a....VwM4rN.W.LdW4.....wN.•.....4114,40 a..r1..:............4..1444..........k 444 .14Wk"4.1444......./ .........4444 I4...1411'441144.4L 4U.a.44,.,M.,..1.44.41.,........MW.F4r.)...F+�'
, .'.',I � w.t�•4.rk.+ i, y1?,fix+ r
M14...t4R w...W...p. /k. Mµ....4...RN ...4a,.N(MYwn4.4rw4.a4Mtr..w4uW4.. a..wrJ,.M..W.•wwaa.r�'wkaF2WIW...M41 WI„,._, ,.e.),.I•..+NA.a .tlw..J.�Y.4Nr.Mdb..144.w...1.d.roM.a 1w.L M14 11.•.ISIwMIn.N.rw.i..Win4wn4wWW,.WWw4.:Maga.wwr
...W.....Y.i............4.+.n•Ww•....4wrrM.44.../...W.......a.W4.4.4........M..OwVM.404..M.4.L_...wi....N.., °'.144.4.444..M4.1.........w...../ 41.1.444.......'.11.4.4.vN...,.......411.4}it 'lY.?W.1.4.4.i4i4a...M.....41441.4/14.14.4144..M.'.ri......:'1.i.44....
r.a.:w...:...........4 4.*r+www..w..................v4.a,.....,'.wwlwKvn.•.... ..,.0+a4auru9?m.YbWaw„w.....g!.41Wn.L..4.......Mw.4.0.0.. ..au...w/..w.n.wl rn.4...414114 t 4,414 4,4.'.n Ow...:,...u..W..r eye'...-,.Y..l•.%,.. ,,,.,n0,,!...,1 i.'.r.A..•••'•.Y..... ■
• '....r..•.w.1.1.p4.o......o.M..4..wxM4.IW..f4...r........4.*...1 1.44.44.4.44............141.44414.44.4.4,...,.1.:..1.i1.00.11..14.1.4,Y.4.M.IW1.170 414,r.IWMq K,c,C Aa......Snn4.4:14.......4.. 1...4...'...0.4#.a a ha i.Y4.1..Nf'#..'..,5M..4,,.K.<',Ya4....'..k
0. :,`. .t f,., f.. i,."n r ., i 1 A,t k,e
' ; G I.0 N.I w.J- ti.4 w.' .114,01.4 4fti61..µ01.fW1..I...l1,1.1 MIMw.'wb.IL.nNM..velq..'.4W..I 4,1.11.�.�n:la Ylfi..l..w.; • x ' L.;0011..44.4, a4.44444 4 d.J../.4..1.14.M.144y4 144.4 MX. ,
• Std m F' , of Pa ab X418 :.kf'1 w C` * , '.' :17,c:' . :;»S°1,"
..MM.•.....•...'.,.4w..•4.k..,...:....r,,w.4....MW 1 w..4144......M1••r................l......M..........1.4.44.444.41141 1.1.1.,4
...„,.a....-a3.44 40 1.41'.4 44 04411W...............W.4Y✓.W..,Milt.....4.4............Iw...'........44.4.4414444........@ uiWW4 w..44.M....w..W.w..a.Iwn4.ww.wwkJa..1.... a
A1n�� icip ated, Dov.ro'1oprne �1` "h ,
.aMAkWbwM.v:.M...wxw...4444+a4..t 4M W,r..uM WMM.-'v...,.WW..r..s+ruww.>:ka•4r.vwfin rtW.1 j.4 t.m.Ora.e'....a .M1.N..uN.W,w.eM4.w.1.W.Varn..waww.+l+Iwi.4w.w. 41,
, ' /7 ,
Valuation ('
4
Y W MW
" ` :WRITE w P M
Special Co��idi� iohs Dedicaticn.
i 1 i fY.YJ..Y'M1.M4.:.I..P..4'J.4.Mw.Y1.�i+1IN..dM.sML4JM.4MYwWM./MNMCI.My.P4.W1ipMWIM4IlML�'.WW.ik.'i..Ml'M..9.M.aMrtbYlMM1'Rala�.l�ll�
c'a a
I. I, rir'!a..4w.h1Y�M1w4..r.+.k»I.M.wwrawW.a+.ib.WM...uY'aJYa4+d.M,IMIM.tIHIJ1d.Wwwla.wW..kw.Wa.MwM.swwl.+ac4A.M+ww+..w.M.R.iow4+vir.li.+.i4rr.wliMY.O....i.'.F.nM.6
} I Other
a..a..'Wwrz..ui.+r..,I..Mw.,.uxrww.>a4'.w,w...:w.w4+tuba+..+..wa.«ut.:+llwaar^r::rw.en...u.i.a4Y.rh+,uc.dxM+cwW.aiur..y...e.a.a.4444..+.I.w..nw,s.+.w.4..Mw
VIFtha1 Inspec ion Cy i s a .wLu..4.44444 dMMww'...I ....G..4wwW....4, r.w..1......,....M,....-w
qr...... ...Mwww...va.M4. ....We:.......,...:..n.....,
1
r
.
' I
■
•
I 1