Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
SDR7-75
POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. .,q ,,,.+.,ti,r..+♦i.M,a,a.W�h.:.:.,.,.,...rl,,.r, t.,i I... ♦ ,.,,a,?Mrm-w„x>ti,.I:.,,,,.4,F. .s.,w.^.x.1,..<,w.t.,.....„�.�u,.liM�..,,nwt.•t.4,+�ou.�.rorrtn,:fµ1 s.!Al.�.n"'.l.,.•w.,..C....,k.,.J.r� 1� ah f . -.t w.rl� ,.,o-lo,,M ti 4,.w,,,«r�ti d.�.,a..n.� ...•t.a,m.,..rar,�,,.,Y.el.Gi.,.+dH_.n r«t,v ':r;;,.„:;u+>a," tf ;. • , ' � ' i'';)1,1(";r; 1.';:i'' E ., ' f , 'r 1`i' ., � * , L•lC 1L .MAi0 I 7ti r c ,�. r, { ,a 1 t ' • .i„ o. S '.} •' . ir ' ), S'Ate Deve1 pmeflt' Re�.C1 eS ',(StA,'',,-7 75 , , , • C E r' 4� • , �„ ..,..,.• ti ,'� I • , • • + 1 • • I ✓ I 4 • • it x ■ • l•' 1, I ICI • • • • } • I. 1 1 • • 1 • I , gq ■ 6 r� r i I , r.; I I I I r / 4 ,.l A ° . . 18 197 Mr. Miohael Do Mahon rM 11825 S. We Greetburg Rd. Reference: File No. SDR 7.75 (Greenburg plaza II) I I Dear Mr. Mahon please be advised that the Tigard site Development and. Design s: Review Board, at their March 6, 1975 .eeting, considered Your re- : guest for site design and architectural review and your site plan was approved, subject to the following recommendation: Applicant 1 n :.. should provide drainage a .nage easematb f 2. Building should resemble or be similar to the existing structure of Greenburg Plaza I. Please do not uuesitate to contact this office at 639-4171 if You need additional information or assistance. Sincerely, 4. Jerald`I Powell p Assoc A : I .. •i 1 1i I I •a' , ,.......; ..•.t a-L ......:..R_•..., r,4. 'J..-Y....-.,.+u..« 1 »•....•:1ra.,.M..--.. 4..-.....N:rAn ,n.r.,...A_ ...1. —. ,.....1+«IIJ fib.::.. . ..., .L....X:..wt,. .rl•..Ii..t..».. I.r..+4..+ u.4• iy.t.l r. _ ,4 MINUTES TIGARD SITE DEVELOPMENT & DESIGN REVIEW BOARD March 6, 1975 - Regular Meeting Twality Junior High School - Lecture Room 14650 SW 97th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon • 1. CALL TO' ORDER A called to o The meeting was 11 rder at ,4. 0 m. w 4 g p • 2. ROLL CALL Members Present: B ar tel, Cook, McMonagle, Wakem, Kelting; n g9 staff: Powell 3. MINUTES • The ''minutes of the February 20, 1975, meeting were approved as read 4. SITE DESIGN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 4.1 SDR 4-75 (Setniker Auto Repair) Applicant's proposal is to build a three bay auto repair shop with a gas pump for his own use. Applicant proposes to leave ` ' existing single family house on .86 acre site using 9,000 sq. / ft° for the proposed shops , " A. Staff R.eport Staff report was read by Powell (see attached) . B. Applicant's Presentation Charlotte Olson, Olson Design; presented applicant's plan. C. Public Testimony . None D. Board Discussion and Action Monte Cook moved to approve site plan with condition #1 from staff report (n o „p ar k1n g to be allowed on frontage ° ' road or access areas) . Seconded (McMonagle) , approval unanimous 1 . Bethlehem Steel) 4.2 SDR 5-75 (Sabre, Construction Co. for Be`thl' . A. Staff Repdrt Staff report was read by Powell 1 }r 1, . . • x fi , • • B. Applicant's Presentation Staff member of Sabre Construction. Co. presented Sabre 's project. • • C. Public Testimony None D. Board Discussion and Action ' McMonagle asked the applicant to explain his reasons for R such a large ,maneuvering area for, 'trucks. The, applicant's Y i representative responded that they anticipated trucks up to 75 ft. long; that they would be tandem truck and trailer units and that they would need enough space to back through a narc, not in one direction, but in at least two different directions in order to drop trailers and maneuver trailers and trucks to the loading doors.': ._ r Bartel and McMonagle' discussed the means' of trucks for s maneuvering space. Consensus of the board was that 100 ft. was the minimum necessary to adequately maneuver trucks into position for this kind of operation. Motion to deny was then mau.e by McMonagle, seconded (Wakem) McMonagle said he felt that the things that the applicant should address before resubmitting were r asphalt area or r (1) justify the 1 ustif• the size of p educe it, (2) show and irrigation plan, and (3) show additional lani t. I � . p -Ling. along the west property r line 10 to 15 ft. in width, filling the north west and southwest corners • Vote to deny was unanimous 4.3 SDR 7 -75 (Mike Mahon Gre enbur Plaza g II) Request for review of a proposed office building to be constructed on a C-3 zone site on SW Greenbu.rg between Lincoln Ave and Center P occupied by Y Sram The�.u.rche is resenml occu ied b a two story st`ucco and e tax lot 200, . ( sto � , `fax map lSl. 35�C) A. Staff qePort Read by Powell (see attached) . B. Applicants Presentation r SDR Min ,tes March 6, 1975 rage 2 • - - 4 /• + 1 ., 4. ._.a ..,, .:,.L.4. 4h—i..- nl. _ w,_laww. , .4';-{+,yI..M°Yu,h:J.«C.t. •tl..4.9,. .he+- ,. .. w r.lut.�t� , Mr. Mahon present e d his Proposal to the Board. { 0. Public Testimony None D Discussion and Action f F .. Board Discuss �. - Cook asked about garbage areas and about outside condense.a^s G a fo r cooling units' Mr. Mann responded that garbage areas would be enclosed and screened and located to the rear of the site, t McMonagle asked about on-site drainage disposal. Applicant McM pP nt 1-? responded that there was a storm drain available and that - his drainage system would be connected into it. [ Felting moved approval of the site plan with recommendation I to provide drainage easement. M( Monagle seconded, vote was (` unanimous for approval E. Architectural Review , at The plan and architectural drawings were presented` by the applicant. Cook moved approval as presented and specified that a con- • should the building should resemble or be ?? ditian ould be that t g ,, • a • the r Plaza to 1�he existing structure _�reerzbu.,.g Pat I. similar Motion was seconded (Bartel) and the vote was unanimous for approval.+z 5. OTHER BUSINESS There was no other business. 6 ADJOURNMENT a} The meeting was adjourned at 6:30 p.m. r w ' i a II j a n • y � • 1 • SDR Minutes - March 6, 1975 - page 3 , '. ni n ,;. .s ,1 :,,... ,_-: C.r....«do i....r h.;oJ, JI4, .t.F. :;p..G.,, ...,,..... .,.k -.i»N,..Mn..:x,,.h t.,.i:.,,i..f r.-;r• natal .., x. .d...s ux .,n aap.rx.A- d SITE DEVELOPMENT & DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Staff Report March 5, 1975 • S DR 7-75 (Greenbur g Plaza II) Applicant • Mike Mahon • • Applcant',s Request to raze an existing two story frame stucco church and build a • two story office building adjacent tic his existing "Greenburg Plaza" building •• Staff Find inks I I 1. Applicant''s submission appears to be adequate but lacks: r at, grading plan ,." / b sign location, design, etc. • c. utility service connections 2. around cover in front of building' outside property line .a• and to rear of building appears too sparse. • 3. Parking and access conforms to code requirements. Staff Recommendation approval if no sign is to be provided on this building. Should • . a pp licant wish to p rovde a s gn� it should be sub ect to ., design review. • a , A is • 0. 1 i C 1 1 .. ,,:f�., .t,r... ..,.n �,:. .....::.,.. ...:., ,...... ,;... ,., -,.tai..11W..;� Y...:ua.:.l;».n�-..t.:.♦x�... ZONE CHANGE CONDITIONAL USE VARIANCE - TEMPORARY USE - NON-CONFORMING USE REQUESTS APPLICATION File # ,' ,. .., Fee Re d. Commission Ti and Planning Commission 639-.4171 Receipt # , ...�.r._ 12 20 SW Main St. , Tigard, Orego n 97223 Date Rec 'd._zry PLEASE PRINT IN INK OR TYPE Action Requested r. I r,. Applicant s Name eW4 '' r Phone w 3 Applicant's Address /p k l � %/4 880 69 :vrfL! 9,Z2 (street (city) state zip Owner's Name ai.C,4k . Phone Owner's Address �� street (ciity state zip ,M1 Applicant is: Own ,er^ Contract Purchaser Developer � Agent Other Owner Recognition of applications a• , signature of owners .....__.�.Y Person responsible for application. � { street _ city stateT— zip PROPERTY INVOLVED: Tax Map # �� ax Lot(s Address (acres) • E)CiSting Build ing s �� and type)i ,.'. .. ,�� ;. it ,. '::. .. _' i I: +, _. ,_ ,-..-•---.-:.-�......_.. Current zoning :� + Current 'Use'I Applicant's Applicants *- 44. Proposed Use REQUIREMENTS Title Report oFasano oRe ,uiremen,ts Legg . Description Vicinity Map Tax Map Site IJevteloternt p , n Site} Plan I , II a1 ,....l..w„ .�K..«..w.,.....«a._u.: ,»:.:...a:.-,w+,..�sS 6..!_.�.._,+-u,��-„,,—r.w:«w-.n...,..,..w a.....,..M,,,r.4:.U.,.,..+io..../,uaaY..'l,.a;t.:t,..'A:;�al..t...h L.L..i , - ,.+;i:a4twr.u.UUii.��i • • • • • ,.,. �- ,.......wC..r.�.,.L..,v..,,-a�»..7,....,.n..-« »h+. w,..,z�.«7..dz'.i..J+r.++1 LFt�,-»y...,U.+.AU.un..trx,n.,lw.tro wi...uv.,.u.,wp Ra✓.fa.w•• { • LO NG NG w / �'1�lXV1YSLL e4 ASS©CIA'rES, INC ' ca NFU ii •T'1 NG E 1 N- E E R S 0 �I r MICHAEL C. MAHON !i jjtt • 11925 ff 628 S.W. GR¢6N®UFtA TIt3Ant:). ORmool,➢97223 • Pk t 6T�9i.�13B • 1 I I sI■ f I (