SDR5-75 POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
(."Irv},n�xii.u' , .i,.,.A....wcs«,.r�•uw.ixr-s-1 t..x...,.�...x,ti.r...aHV. ;
s..a....., .n ...k.,.w..+,.a..+,.�wx..y..,,y�.�; •
A��a,�.wa..,it.K ..niai.,xr+ r .-.., ,,.,a...,..x v». .. _ _ .�.yw,.....+. .-«.r,:.-....��«-.:near,•,..ive.. _ -. I
i
�• r - , 3
ti'
. ,
�� '�
'il
i
, ` vu
. ,
�
•
v
;1,
i
4
qp��y� (�V{��} {� '�yy�p.��}�• +gyp!
i
�Ffrr�y�' V�f�V+�i+.o��r',7�'4U'W�� � �W"�,'� � � � . . ��1' •
. 722 S. e Bonita Rd ' � � '
, 1 'Ti � d, ,Qreg4 " P 3 , : � � i,
Re erence lt rile T't . DR -"f (Sabre/Bethlehem Stool
D ar w cG ,e
Please be advised that the Tigard Site Development
and Derma a.
197 niee i , 's'
•
,
request s sig ad s c ite t ra review and your, subs
. '
. , Uissi0X was, aproved ubject to. `o Uog onditioa t , y
r s
nx
' :is to be erin areas „ :
m The i ot, wes cornea of' the Mateuvering area waist b '
a'oa ed*
`� , The landscaped. islands adjacent to the ng: and truck
some major an gs
provided
' 4 m, inirrigation t t s to be provided
landscaping •
i. '. . ; -, , - ,H . .5.' . NOrthern Yards'. landscaping aud tethlahOm 'Stool,
be .tied together with' a common plant Material theme*
ease: .'do not es
• have any, 0st s' o need ad Ona `orma o . .',
, � � �. Si a ely, : : '
1
■
a
ii
f
.
,
��,., .�.,,�...,., �..�, F.. ... ., �, •� ... ,..,� ,,,,�,. w.,.. ,.. ��,,.� r...,,�w«.� as.va.x;�,I,�A ,,�, "v r. +.��.„c�,;m•�kn1 Nl{�; aM 'ni b,b.,�dMkv ,d„ . .'ex•� „ ,..•x�wr .�. ,.y�.i
1 r
e '
r
i
i
i
i
'April 1 107 '
' ' 7225 S. W. BOf it6 ,
R .
.T'i gar 9 Oregon 9722
' .e reCe t " 1e No'. CDR 5 75 (abret3e alehem Steel) ,',
'Dean 1Cr koae
Please Tigard Site eVelo rent and Deem r�
Review Bo rd,, at their Mar ,. l975 meet ng,' oonsidered your J',,.
reque t o ' site design and ardhitooti,lral review and your sub-
•
'mission . denied.„ At this time' the Board agreed that the , .
I following tems could be ad.1i essed. before ,re a mi g yo ,
r,d:1 plan y..4,,,
I. justift the Justify size of the asphalt area. or red oe its' :,u?
• .. Shaw an irrigation: p - .
a ShoW.,,additianal. :pIatting along the west property. line ,� . '
10' to' 15 d in With) f ill,..i the northwest, and south-, '
west oo rsa
Please do not hesitate to eontaot this. a loe a 6 941 1 if you
• 'have'any ue Lion or need :add t .on information.: : J ',r '
• . .
Q 1
it
•°• Jerald. w ?o 1,, ASaOo o A °;1
I
�I
yy•i1 A
r
l
. 1.
„
.��.,�.. ..r.,,..„ r n _ ....'N',:+`«.ctn,w•rm, .,rY+rohr 2 r ,, 4 ,
501ç ' c H
. MINUTES ;
TIGARJY SITE DEVELOPMENT '& DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
March 20, 1975
Twality Junior' High School lecture room
• 14
6 0 SW Avenue , Tigard, Oregon 97223 22
,
1. CALL TO ORDER
; The meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
Present: Mann, McMonagle, Edin, Bartel, Wakem, Powell (staff)
3. OF MINUTES
The minutes of the March 6, 1975, meeting were not yet available. •
Chairman Bartel noted that McDonald' s site plan and architectural
plan would not be available for consideration at this meeting,
so item 4.1 would be stricken from the agenda.
4. SITE DESIGN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
4.2 SDR 5- 75 (Sabre/Bethlehem Steel)
Request for review of a proposed warehouse and office space to
be constructed in an M-2 zone on SW Landmark Lane off SW 72nd
Ave. This is a resubmission item.
A. Staff Report
read by Powell (see attached)
B. Applicant's Presentation
Presentation by Mr. Mike McGee for Sabre Construction Co. ,
• indicated that they had attempted to comply with requests
of the Board, but felt that they could defend the requested
large maneuvering area. The maneuvering area was therefore
• not reduced in size, although an additional 5 ft. of planting
area was given on the west side and an additional planting
area had been provided in the parking area next to the
building. Mr: McGe e a lso stated that he ag r ee d with th the
staff's exception.
recommendations with the '� that he felt
that no landscaping need be provided along the railroad
easement at the back of the parking lot. He then. further .
explained the traffic patterns in the maneuvering area and
explained the schematic drawing of those traffic patterns
that he had provided the Design Review Board.
I i
^ ..... _... „ ,.. „Irw......„..-,i,...•.r..._>:...,.... ._.....p...,..a..,..,,.,. ,... .,....r ., ..a.,: ,., xl, a,.•,.,,.ray; e a . ,r .. .... u. .. . .x w
.w'a....1,M .d,a i.vru.a - ..,.•,. ...,f..” LI# ',',A`Nbam,.',:u.il ..t7,R... 4..,i(-;(::�:rrl'..�+}a..u, ..U:i....n!-,,,.nl=h,,ti{a-A:,1.Y,,:rthw°.^.w.;
{ C. Board. Discussion and Action
Motion (Wakem) to deny based on lack of time to review the ri
proposal.
at and
. `
Seconded (Edin) , Motion defeated with Mann, McMonagle ar
Bartel against.
Mation to accept (Edin) on the conditions that:
;(l) No permanent or temporary storage of parked trailers
should be allowed in the parking or maneuvering areas.
(2) that the northwest corner of the maneuvering area be
landscaped
(3) that the landscaped islands adjacent to the parking and
"
truck loddirx door be relocated and that some major .
plantings be provided there
(4) that an irrigation system be provided
(5) that N o rth er n Yards landscaping and Bethlehem Steel
landscaping be tied together with a common plant
material theme
McMonagle seconded
Approval was by majority vote, (Wa1em nay)
Architectural Design Review
A. Applicant's Presentation ' .
Mr. McGee presented the color board and architectural `
elevations of his proposed building indicating the ,
basically metal building would have tilt slab lower portions 4;
and that a broom finish would be applied to those areas.
He also indicated that mechanical equipment would be lo-
cated on top of the building.
B. Board Discussion and Action
Motion to a pp rove (McMonagle) , seconded (Edin) , carried
b y majority.. (Wakem abstained, Mann nay) • ,
4,1 SDR 6-75 (McDonald t s) kkk , l
A request for review of a proposed franchised fast foods
restaurant at SW Pacific Hwy, and School St.
A. Staff Report
Staff report was read by 'Powell (see attached)
SDR Minutes - March 20, 1975 page
•
( r
,, - II ., .. ., .:..., I,:,„..... ,,,,,..,,..i.. ..•I,. r.„w ,_...- .....,._,r iLe.r„ n'„w't,-.a..«..-:,.n..r.. ',I..1.6+.,",z,'.,,, «.FFTt1'..I.x'..,w.1, ...,,...,.-t;..d,'.'a:l.".:+ ,.Jr,",rr.;.,..T,n.A4 .ran_„u.w.:Fl!I.«..,,.4-.•.:o
Bartel asked when submission was made. Staff responded
Tuesday, explaining that due to the continuing character
of the case it was felt that it should be brought back as
soon as '.possible to the Design Review Board. . .
Wakem asked why staff accepted the resubmission that did
not speak to the issues. brought up by the Design Review Board.
Staff replied that McDona� l' s had sought other remedies to
the problems seen rather than accepting Design Review Board's
solutions.
Wakem asked that the City Attorney's opinion, cited in the
staff report, be read in full
Staff complied.
McMonagle asked what Zoning applied in the area.
Staff pointed out areas of A-2 and C-3 zoning around the
;Site.
McMonagle asked for documentation of the lease on the
whole site
Staff indicated its only documentation was the site plan, ),
no lease documents or other documentation was available
to the staff at the time.
McMonagle asked if any site changes had really been made.
Staff pointed out that the site plan showed the School St.
easement as part of the McDonald' s site and that the building
was shifted somewhat on the site and that the exit to Grant
St was added.
McMona g le asked if the a pp licGnt.had actually v acat ed th e
•
School St. easement.
Mr. Robertson, the property-owner, responded that he had
discussed vacation of the easement with the School District.
Mr. Fennell, School Supt. , clarified by remarking that the
issue had been brought up to the School District Admini-
stration,, but it ye
_i Y M
• had not been before the School
Board
•
Bartel asked staff ab out the City' s position with respect ct
• •to vacation
of. School Sto
Staff responded that
S it was t p it the City' s position that it
• did not want necessarily, b than several land -
but that s and owners on,
Grant St. wanted it to remain open. Staff also pointed out
that at opinion by the previous City engineer had indicated
that it w s not a desirable p.. right-of-way,
u.bl. c
� ,that
]din maid denial on the basis
StYR Minutes March 20, 1975 - page 3
9
(1) The Board does not have sufficient information of
the legal status of the property.
(2) The Board does not have adequate information on
the proposed use for the remainder of the site.
(3) The submission was received toolate to adequately
review it.
(4) It appears to be a partition of land undertaken
without proper City approval.
•
Bartel stated that he had intended to conduct this meeting
under public hearing rules and that he felt that if the
motion was made for denial, then all parties should be
heard; however, that if a motion was made not to accept a
submission, due to insufficient information or because
some statutory requirements were not met, then that would
• be a different matter. Based upon this, then, the chairman
felt that he could not support the motion as stated.
• Wakem said it se'emed more appropriate not-.t6 accept the
submission and allow the applicant to settle the land
partitioning question elsewhere other than in front of the
Design Review Board.
Edin asked if he could change his motion to be "moved to
take no action based on the four findings:
(1) The Board does not have sufficient documentation
as to the legal status of the property. IA 4
(2) The Board does not have adequate information on .
the proposed use of the remainder of the site.
(3) The submission was received too late to adequately '
review it.
(4) It appears to be a partition of land undertaken
without proper City approval. "
Seconded (Mann) ,
McMonagle said that he felt that part of the purpose of
the Board was .to guide whoever comes before the Board to :
knowing what the Board wants. He felt a recap of the
Board' s findings and the Board's wishes with respect to
site design would be in order and that particular site
problems identified by the Board should then be specifically
addressed by the applicants with City staff and, if necessary,
City legal counsel, so that the Board, is not put in the
position again of reviewing an inadequate submission,
Bartel asked if McMonagle could not support or if he felt
8DR Minutes - March 20 1975 - page 4
•
•
it needed clarification.
McMonagle said he supported the motion but felt that clari-
. fication was needed. Several questions existed that he
wanted answered before the project was again before the
, Design Review Board. Those questions are: (1) What is
the use of the entire property and all parts of it and what
is the intended use of the entire property, (2) What is
the road from Grant Street? Is it an eavesment, driveway,
or what? (3) The site plan should show the entire site.
(4) That street improvements will be .made to Grant St. and
to Park St. and how will pedestrian traffic to the site from
the rear be handled? (5) What will Robertson do about
W School St. and. what is the City's position with respect to
, School St. ?
't
Powell, staff, asked if McMonagle intended to recommend that A
• . egress from the site be to Grant St.
McMonagle stated he was not stating a preference either way.
Powell stated that staff may not be empowered to speak to
• ,
the rights enjoyed by the property owners holding interest
• in the eavesments, but could speak to the City's wishes
with respect to continued public access through that eaves-
ment to a public street.
Wakem queried McMonagle if his request applied after the
applicant had resolved the land partition issue.
McMonagle said that it depended on what the applicant de-
cided to do.
Bartel said that he felt that if the applicant wanted to
use the entire tract, then he would not have to address
• , the land partition issue, but that if the applicant in-
tended to partition in the future, he would have to answer
the questions brought up by the community then. -He pointed
out that there may be a risk involved there.
McMonagle acknowledged Bartel's comment, but said that
• he didn't think the Board should or could deal with a
future possibility.
Mann asked if the vacation of the eavesment must be addressed
before the applicant could show it as a part of the site
• plan.
Staff Said that may be, but is not necessarily true, An
applicant for a building permit or for site development
approval need not necessarily be the owner of the land
at the time the approval is given, but ultimately that issue
• will have to be resolved. The City would hold the applicant
(/ to developing the site plan that had been approved, '
SDR Minutes - March 20, 1975 - Page
• (
,. . .',. 'i,i ,. ..,: ., t.,.,..:...L.._... '.. ... ..x._.,' ....:....»....J........,i, ...w,.,ew .,«, .,+ _... ..,,.,,.u. r. .... _.M.N.....wW_(:.:..,.N..,..:1r dL.,. .-.. ...a ,... . «...r Nr..l:..........•y.--e N4.,...a._...,InNRI...a.Nr... k.s..0 ..Y4w..:'1:V64
•
Bartel, asked McMonagle if his request was a motion to amend
Edin's motion.
McMonagle affirmed a that it was.
.
g
Seconded (Wakem)
Ammendment approved (unanimously)
Question called on Edin's Motion, as amended.
Approved (unanimously) .
Chairman Bartel instructed staff to advise applicant of
the outcome of the meeting. •
Staff agreed.
Mr. Robertson asked if that was all.
Bartel said that the hearing was over, but the meeting was
°, not adjourned, and that the applicant could discuss .his
project with the B oard informally after the meeting.
5. OTHER BUSINESS
Wakem expressed his concern over the review time available to
the Board members. '
Staff indicated that the problem was that several deadlines
were stacked up on the few critical days and that a solution
could be to change Design Review Board meeting days.
Bartel asked if staff had any suggested day.
+, t Staff asked if second and Fourth Tuesdays would be acceptable.
Bartel asked if there were any objections from the Board.
. ,m
MoMonagle asked when the next meeting 1,--uld be.
Staff said the April 3 meeting as would be a� scheduled. The
following meetir Would be on the 2nd. and 4th ,Tuesdays of
each month.
6. ADJOURNMENT
Chairman Bartel adjourned the meeting at 7:00 p.m.
An informal session followed the close of the meeting with '
informal dialogue between McDonald ss, Robertson and the 7
members of the Design Review Board.
•
-SDR Minutes March 20, 1975 - page 6
n�,4
eM
,
,
' TIGARD SITE DEVELOPMENT
AN D DE SIG N REVIEW BOARD
Staff Report
March 20, 1975
SDR 5-75 (Bethlehem Steel Building) •
f Applicant
1 Sabre Construction Co.
Applicant's Proposal
to build a 14,000 sq. ft, warehouse including 2340 sq. ft. of ,
office space with loading oadin docks for rail and truck on a 46,000
sq. ft. site
Site Development Plan and Architectural Review
of a proposed warehouse and office in an M-2 zone on SW Landmark ,
Lane off. SW 72nd Ave. (part of tax lot 600, tax map 2S1-l2A)
Staff Findings
n, ,
1. Several deficiencies in applicant's submission re noted:
a. Site. plan does not show relationship to existing
development on either Northern Yards or Owens Corning
site (paragraph 2, Ch. 18.58.030) .
b. Location, size, materials of sign(s) are not shown.
c. Irrigation system not shown
2. Landscaping is required in parking areas approximately, 70'
on center. Area shown as "truck maneuvering area" exceeds
minimum maneuvering area requirements. Skimpy landscaping
in and bordering this area would benefit from additional
plantings.
3. Applicant' s resubmission does not conform to request of '
Design Review Board.
4: Sourgum indicated on the plan is not available locally and
is of questionable application in the Portland area.
5. A pplicant has previously applied ed for Design Review on ad-
,
)acent Northern Yards site. An approved site plan is
available for that site although landscaping is not yet " •
completed and occupancy permit has not been granted.
•
6. Tigard Pla nning Commission app roved 10' setback variance
on east Side of subject building on the condition that
applicant complete dedication of Landmark Street and his
major land partition on this site. Presently the site
indicated here is a part of tax lot 600 and is not a
„ Js. 1 •
1/ 1 y
•
F. .n:.1 i_. _,. -#'i ._. .-.. .,. .:,"" ._.. _ :A,.� .......u,a...a._.s,z....as.,.....x..j....... ......a...... ...,.w..:l.r r.._,....:.w...s>.:M:r.a.'d1-ca.»a..u,_.+.w..,.... :. w..... .,w. ..a....+..e..i.mld.r.,
•
segregated lot. Tigard code prohibits disposal, transfer,
r sale, or agreement to sell any parcel in a major or minor •
partition prior to Planning Commission approval of such
partition (Ch. 17.12.070, Tigard Municipal Code) . Such
approval has been given; however, the street dedication
which is a part of the major land partition has not yet
been accepted by the City. That dedication must be final=
• ized and the major land partition recorded before any
further building permits will' be issued.
Staff Recommendation r
I
Staff Recommends approval on the condition that: •
1. Additional plantings at the south l end of the parking area
be provided with major plantings compatible with Northern
Yards landscaping.
r+ "tie"2. Ground co��er plantings I be provided that ta.e Northern
Yards landscaping in to the Bethlehem Steel plantings
along their common boundary.
3. Some large evergreens be provided in east.and west setback
areas and along RR easements at the back of the parking, lot.'
7
4. Landscape islands adjacent to parking and truck loading
door be relocated and some major 'evergreens be provided.
5. No storage be allowed in maneuvering area.
I I
. I
4
a•
I I
SCR' Staff, .e ort - 3/20/75 item 4.2 e 2
• I
II
y
( ' ,
• . .rr1.w...w , ... x ,. .«.«,N.'.:xA'...,..w.W,..«,,, ,.1..,,.,,.,..,L,a._,..__..0.,..-„ix'„i,,..,ra,...,,.,..1,1.„t'„y, ,ir«t,..,,.,,.r_...nx««,.,«.A ...n,.V1-+.......se..x M....,«.... w„1,....1,...4t, r_M-Vw::,Y:....an.w:4,A..A\.k:a'nX'.,.-,.»..4,411>.w.(..t.L1r:Y..t:G.,t4:Ml.wa: ”4tt'..11'r.w:«1...::.NS.+:M.i,A.:...Jl,((dILU..u.Y,WIM' : t
+ I
.)n },
MINUTES S ,1
1V�[.T
TIGARD SITE DEVELOPMENT & DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
March 6, 1975 Regular Meeting
Twality Junior High. School - Lecture Room
14650 SW 97th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon
1. CALL TO ORDER
I
The meeting was called to o rder at 4:40 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
Members present: Bartel, Cook, IMcMonagle, Wakem, Kelting;
staff: Powell sr
3. MINUTES
The minutes of the February 20, 1975, meeting were approved
as read. u:
4. SITE DESIGN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
4.1 SDR 4-75 (Setniker Auto Repair)
Applicant's proposal is to build a three bay auto repair shop !, '
with a gas pump for his own use Applicant proposes to leave
existing single family house on .86 acre site using 9,000 sq.
ft. for the proposed shop. • .
A. Staff Report
Staff report was read by Powell (see attached)
B. Applicant's Presentation .
Charlotte Olson, Olson Design, presented applicant's plan.
C. Public Testimony
None
I I
D. :hoard Discussion and Action i1
Monte Cook moved to approve site plan with condition
#1
from staff report (no parking, to be allowed on frontage
read or in access areas) .
I I I I
Seconded (McMonagle) , approval unanimous. . 1
4.2 SDR 5-75 (Sabre Construction Co. for Bethlehem Steel) 4
A. Staff Report
Staff report was read by Powell
II
I I
B. Applicant's Presentation
Staff member of Sabre Construction Co. presented Sabre 's J .
project.
C. Public Testimony a.
None `
D. Bo and D
Discussion si o
n and Action ti o
n
McMonagle asked the applicant to explain his reasons for
such a large maneuvering area for trucks, The applicant's
representative responded that they anticipated, trucks up
to 75 ft. long; that they would be tandem truck and trailer
units and that t th
e y would need enou h space to back throug h
a narc, no t i n on e
'direction, but in at 'least two different 1
directions in order to drop trailers and maneuver trailers
and trucks to the loading doors .
Bartel and McMonagle discussed the means of, trucks for
maneuvering space.
Consensus of the board was that 100 ft. was the minimum
necessary to adequately maneuver trucks into position for
this kind of operation.
.,,' seconded is
Motion to deny wa� r.Y made by McMonagle, econded (Walcem) .
McMonagle said hu felt that the things that the applicant
should address before resubmitting were:
t (1) justify the size of the asphalt area or reduce it,
(2) show and irrigation plan, and T
(3) show additional planting along the west property
line 10 to 15 ft. in width, filling the north r
west and southwest corners
Vote to deny was unanild.ous
4.3 SDR 7-75 (Mike Mahon./Oreenburg Plaza II) '
Request of SW building to be _constructed
e west for review b
on a C-3 zone site on ' between Lihcoln Ave., and Center
tl. occupied b
church (tax lot 2 y stucco
St. The site is presently p' by a two stor. and.
frame chun l t 00, tax map lSl 35DC)
A. Staff Report
Read by Powell (see attached) .
B A pp lioant is Proeenta"oion
•
SDI. Minutes March 6 �7� page l a e
f
(I
- , ....... .,.w„„a., _ .,..,.,......«...,. .. .... .swu,..,_..„.«a.......,.u' ,-.4, .»1..:-.-_.:.-c.::_.....,,,.:..M......+..i.,..»..,-t.au.-....�a,a.«.c...ur ..._.a.«a ,.. .. .. ,..n._ .r.,,..w. ».
4
' Mr. Mahon presented his proposal to the Board.
C. Public Testimony
None
D.. Board Discussion and Action
Cook asked about garbage areas and about outside condensers .
for cooling units.
Mr. Mann responded that garbage areas would be enclosed and
screened and located to the rear of the site.,'
McMonagle l e a ked about on-site to d ai n a e disposal.1.
Applicant n t
responded that there was, a storm drain available and that A4
his drainage system would be connected into it.
Keltin g moved approval of the site plan with recomme
ndation
to provide drainage easement. McMonagle seconded, vote was
unanimous for. approval.
E. Architectural Review
•
The plan and architectural drawings were presented by the
applicant.
Cook moved approval, as presented and specified that a con--
dita_
on should be that the building should resemble or be
similar to the existing structure of Greenburg Plaza 1."
Motion was seconded (Bartel) and the vote was unanimous for
approval.
5. OTHER BUSINESS
There was no other business.
6. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 6:30 p.m.
• 'r
! i
SDR Minutes - March 1 6, 1975 page'
�rrx'r r n
0
. 1 .. ....- .l ... ....u................,e ,.a,....+r...-.,., ..-n....4.,,......v-x3 w.r .....,_.....W.-.,...,...«........ .......i.-, ,.. ...r. .r '
N •
TIGARD SITE D EVELO PM EN T
AND DE S IQP REVIEW BOARD
Staff Report
March 5 9 1975
l5
SBR 5-75 (Bethlehem Steel Building)
_ $ Applicant
Sabre Construction Co.
Applicant's Proposal
r r.
to build a 14,000 sq. ft. warehouse including 2340 sq. ft. of
office space with loading docks for rail and truck on a 46,000 '
sq. ft. site.
' Site Development Plan and ,e i:''6liltectural Review
of a proposed warehouse and office in an M-2 zone on SW Landmark
Lane off SW 72nd Avenue (part of tax lot 600, tax map 2S1-12A)
Staff Findings
1. Several deficiencies in applicant's submission are noted:
. . r
a. Site plan does not show relationship to existing de
velop -
ment on either Northern Yards or Owens Cornin g s ite
. r
(paragraph 2, Ch. 18.58.030) .
b. Location, size, materials of sign(s) is not shhown.
c. Size of "plantings't not (shown.
2 It is noted that the street 'width is 32 ' and not 5Q'' as 'r
whown (50 ' street "as shown" is the right-of-way line) .
3. Landscaping is required in parking areas approximately 70'
on center. Area shown as "truck maneuvering area" exceeds
optimum maneuvering area requirements. Skimply landscaping
,.
in this area would benefit from an effort to meet code
requirements. Paved area appears excessive to needs.
4. Irrigation system not indicated.
5. What is a cortina pine?
r �a
6. Applicant has previously applied for SbR' on adjacent`acent
��Northern
Yards site.
7. Tigard Planning Commission approved 10' setback variance
on e ast side of building on the condi tion tha t applicant
complete dedication of Landmark Street and his major land P
partition on this site. (�
•
r e
rr
a r ,
ti�
•
•�•� ,,.,, ...,I..,.+.. ...... .. .....u, 'i ,._..w...,, .,.,.. ..........a'�.,.r ,,._.....r:I..M�„.xr1. ..:e;, H..,.,,.. .,...,.�,�''„w 1.a.•.+..,.. ,i......,.,.,,r..,.•,...�..�......:.ri.a, ,....,[-r�.,.mrCllet..:a..i+.lxt�tiru.'.au.,,.nr,«,.:..x..lM.........,..�e,` FI..,,,...,, ,,...;G»'.;....;—.«...,.,.,,..:c la.lk.,.;«...._
•
S taf f Recommendation mx nd at iqn
Staff recommends approval on the condition that:
1. The planting area on the west side of parking area be 10'
rather than 5'r shown; that additional plantings at the
south end of the parking area be provided with major
plantings compatible with Northern Yards landscaping be
provided in the southwest corner of the parking lot.
planting interval of Cortina ines” ( sic) to
2. Decrease pl g pines" �
15 or 20 ft. or plant upright deciduous trees. •
3 Provide more significant planting on west property line.
Recommend at least 6' evergreen plant height, not
necessarily a hedge, however,'
•
•
n
I �I
V
SbR Staff Report r
March
5� ���� -
page
• I f
a � ,
„ e
A .. „y,n xl,,, �xJlr.t r„.xy i,lt..+"tl',v I .,u.,. ,x «w,..,n, �•ne...,..1'� .
•, .�..,..u.. ....m„,.lG ......,'s4�.l,:u.. _ .,.1. ., at.,,,.:. ..r a....,...,....- ......,......2•...,'1....a.L, ..1.:�.-.::w....w-.....�Y.�A.:....._.t;.a,:.'u:..�,....� ,......r .L, ,:u:...«w.J:.:.i..;.:.....,....(z.A4::..sv....�.,.- W. ».Y.:M..:.;:wt...:..w,....4.-:,.....1,....,+..YNaY,lw4ti�'-.'.:.r.........:.»nt-6 W:w..M.y..:t_:4:.,..,:pK„Ix-..s=
et
ir
BUTLERIB' ll. .
ROOF SYSTEM
. ,
....,. (.... quality roof at
an economical price
✓
f `_, • Butlerib It roof panels are factory punched or
, /: ,:,,f, available unpunched for added economy ,
�,
• ,'r ' , / / • Constructed of corrosion-resistant materials
•,, i'y'r , ,> K',' • Full-length roof panel up to 38'9"—with three
, ,Kr ,1,,,,,>',-4,,4,`',` ; foot covering width
` [3utlerib xI design configuration
,,
r
, .,,n,, ,,,,,) l,',,`„,,, �das '
�; C Precision roll-formed f.
f ',:, ",,'t.;;,9„ `' f' /0 • Superior side lap configuration with full length
5� !■1,,,g;,',,4 �'1
A ,
1, , ' ci'',,`,'r sealant groove
,, ., t ,,,,/ • Available in galvanized steel with factory applied' .
Parchment Color Finish or in Hi-Tensile alum-
inum. Galvanized steel plain mill finish available,
• Utilizes curved one-piece ridge panel that
.w matches roof panel configuration
• Available with Lite*Panl sky lights; uninsulated '
or insulated
• Underwriters' Laboratories, Inc. Class 9b wind A
uplift rating available.
K
,
:
W
,
sealbrit
i•: P A N E L O S C T O N Cil
1 .
MATERIAL
LOADING
Available in 24 or 26 gauge galvanized steel or 0,026” Hi Butlerib B. roof panels are designed for live loads up to 50
Tensile aluminum, psF with standard 5"-O" purlin spacings,
. ,
UtL�FT BUTLER MANUF CTUJ UWO COMPANY
PRO,EILI GT DESCRipTION
�.:'" t 06w1.ItAt OPPICfifi/{(�NAN9/tl Ai,rnYUfi0UR1 BUTLER'S It ROOF SYSTEM
w
Pellet' Pending� P tbbdpbk T ate, sil being,'itn t
dVdd A
t{�dtb bro, he I� ti t�tl a
tl p d ten.
Pt`irtt�d i ftJ�5� A at b t a hr ird aros st aHuUltI® tBb f�hlt leti bW hu det r M Trlidb a r Bo Coi elY bl o I o o 5t lb t bolrMa,atbon.,
'
i Fot'M
No',23°"243
i
• Yb / \ I I 4 ,
(rr
� . I w ....,...,,. W._.,.,«...,,,.- ._J...«,J.,_..-._. _...,+..y.,..._,,,_,_.,",.,.,_...:»,,.,."r-.I«,,:. `'i.ia ,.r..,-,. .«., ..t:^r....:.,..,.•.<....,:wi..,,.,,a,.._...w..w.....,.,•,.,,.w:w,,...,1114_iv.a...,^.._J..,:.a....,.+.1-.+sw:.r:::s...,.t„-4:'•1....\,.",.•...r.■.rr' 1:ww o.....7..,•.a,1.:r,,..•.:..;...e...,m..».A...;.I...4..,.-,J..L wyr.u.k,,,1,
Z r T "}I ,,.• r ^W, 1 1 _ Y W H^ w , M
Y 1 y I • 1
j 1
t r l r ' 'r ¢t
, f ,, :I 1,-.,,!,',,,,,,,,,• I l ' ;II 76„ I �A3 r' I d y
f i, Y ,
N. I', I ����� I I,,'�, 1 1 a _ ''i�`,e4 t Ili I �li '��"r� \ '.1��.r� �µ 44.44 1 ;•� I
i 12`' 1'2�� 12•I S' ;
I i t J'
�7 l•,/ry r� !y, ', AAi:� tryry `C ty- 9
.4.,S Ir1i1 3,'.' IH^1/G'► I, I - fr ' r IIt a I", t i } _
* 19/3 / �:•, I �,•
r
l; r.
r
, „ r
I
.::,,,, ,, , i„.. ::: ,
1
:, y .l
17/16" 1
1
• A , ^`
1
PANEL CR •.8W l� Y
i 1 .r. _,a,,.. ,,,!,
SECTION PROPERTIES FOR ONE'FOOT OF WIDTH j
1•
DESIGN WEIGHT Compression Ong Outside Compression On Inside '
PANEL MATERIAL E(ksi) Fy(ksi) I ,
ThIICItNESSl#/FT1 Sx(in.3) I (in. ) Sx lin.3) I (in.4)
•
26.4X;,GALV4 STEEL 019$ ,I'1.14 29;500 42,0 " ,053;1 rp691 r, •0437:' ;','',04O4;',
1 24-GA.GALV.STEEL .0257 1.45 29,500 42.0 .0742 :0932 ,0668 .0577 ,
--r-
1 ,:«026"ALUMINUM , I ,0,50 1,.0.45 10,000 42,0,, «0753 .0944 067 .1 i.r• ,05588
it
NOTE:Section properties have been calculated in accordance with the 1968 A.I.S.I,Specifibation.
•
,
o. ALLOWABLE UNIFORM LOAD (PSF1 '
► _ SPAN=2.0' SPAN=2,5' SPAN=3.0' I SPAN=4.0' SPAN=5.0'
PANEL MATERIAL NUMBER
OF SPANS 0 S P S P S P S P S
" Th.6'E 6 I', 251' 381 1641' 244 114 17,0 68 ' 05: t 40 62
•
26.GA.`,'GAI,V.STEEL '-1 ' .•.,• .r w ':,,t4; __
I
r
FOUR 240. 356 133' 228 100
THREE 353 525 225 330 156 234 87 132 55 85 '
• 24-GA.GALV,STEEL — - - --
' FOUR 329 490 210 314 146 219 81 124 51 60 i
•
7W l`i E E 359 531 229 340 1619' z35 89 1 t3� 57 '1#5
b26 ALIT 1493 12
. IVI I N u(11i
you ' 335'. 496 214 315 221 4' 53 Bp
NOTES( 1, Legend-P=pressure on outside face; S=suction on outside face t'
2, Suction values have been increased 1,33 as allowed by Section 3.1 of the 1968 A,I.S.I,specification, i
■- 3. All values shown are Net Usable Loads.Weight of panel hat been deducted from them
pressure values and added to suction values.
1
i i!!
• •
•
BUTLER BUTLER MANU' ACTURING COMPANY TECHNICAL„+ w /i 1 1 O.
f, .ahnienAL'orr'ICh5 nANao9 CPT,' MraooUnl BU.I L RIB l �y �+
13 U 1 fl f3 [loop F J i, �5„�hn
n U.S.A. Form IVb.2331-17473
Printed i r
..., .... ....... .. ..... 4444 .... „„,.,,, ..�,..� , . .. .,
.. ..,. , ,,. , . ,,,• 4444 , n.4..444 ,4.44., .,,.. ..
. . „
. . •
. .
.
. . „ In+1/4
. . . , -,,.. ,• . .
. .
, . .
. . ,
. , .
. .
. .. , ..
. ,
.,.
.. r
1 .
PASTENER INSTPiLLATION DETAILS . :i 1:' , ,'L ..:'; .',. , : ''';,' ,, ' :':',:, .,, :i,,,,,, ,,. ., ,:.',-.,, , ' ! l'i •
:,1', ,,, ' ,,r' ':', . ' ,,;. ,,, ,. :.' ' :.• ; ,;:: , - :„ . ,,'',. ' r PANLASTICSEALANT'APPLICATION
. ,
:111111Iiiilli ''-0111‘1111\
. .
, .
• .. _
I PANEL TO PANEL 1, , „
,
SPLICE 1 FASTENERS , , ,
1 1,1
, , 1, .1
PUR LIN ---7 ,
. , .
H I.
i ......,......_ I___
/ • „i • ,:, . • • 7... 1 r, il--I -/ I$
1
. r
V 1 1 . ,
„
.41
PANEL TO i I
1
, .
STRUCTURAL i
1 , (.7 ,
, FASTENER - .1 ,„1 Z
' I
Cr)
tC 3
1'.1 I „ 2 a.
I I • Ell Cn ,
I I F,,., 1 /
. I
.();)t
\ $
.4".. .. • • 1 • • 4 I • • ,, fir I.L.' ,
, ! '
■ i —
. . . . ,
• ,
. .
. 0 6
' PURLIN ,
ENDLAP SPLICE AND INTERMEDIATE FASTENING
..,
? , ,
,
, ..
LOCATION ,
• ,
SEALANT'.
„ .... " .
,, .,, ,, , •.,
SEALANT 1
• GROOVE 11,;!
■ , ,
. ' PANLASTIC SEALANT APPLIED ALONG'ENTIRE LENGTH
AND WIDTH OF,PANEL AS SHOWN
. ,
. .
• SIDELAP DETAIL
, .
, .
. .,
//-'„,';--:4" '-- SLOTTED HOLES FOR EXPANSION AND
CONTRACTION WITH FACTORY PUNCHED PANELS ,
27-''' r ,
.,,,,, "7777—s■,...,,,,,,,,_,-......,... '''''''''''---,— PURLIN
--•••'.....;, '..- ,\ .
, 1
1 ..,
. . .,,•, . , . , , . , . ,1 • • •.■, , , . I
• ', • .
TECHNICAL INFORMATION
urtfl:2), 013.uN1te,,,,La onn.i,%i..UsFAKCAINt.r.fitNdT vC 0.NI,a 73 t Nu.1%, ,
1:111TLErlig it ROOF SYSTEM
• ,
. . ., nolo bulltlinti Oroducts tato,oonmilintly bohni Itnotovfidl, thotnrort, the I„ntoijOttinn
Form No 2891-12./0 ligdt!AVVIIt'6t'gillittill tr11111:19P Cit)kW 6 ill illote IgtfilMegfilCtillfdilitIrlilaiiltYhtt!'"Oeco l'itAriA'ati`:,:',:, r' 'I ' ' 11 11'P11411i 'd hi U.806+:
ot. „
. . ,
( .
. . 4 • ,
• I / r4 '
' 1 .wJxl....J,. 4.........«.n..._...-...I-.....4.r..._............+.......J....+..4....-....,r...._. ...,.. .�Y,:....L...._...ww.».aw4.✓LL.}al...n...-»..i... 4..,4..«i.N ..... ............i,... ...v.._...«nA_4... .1..4.,...«4»J.'.lAl.w«..+.J:«In.F ...,........_r......��.n«ww..w.1.1',,..w.w4.-M..n. .a.•..[a..«x�.n'+r'-rt.iF...ryKµ%:s#fi.aa.
F'
i
l SPECIFICATIONS
.
• I.GENERAL III.PANEL DESIGN
• A. The roof shall be covered with precision roll formed A. Panels shall be designed in accordance with AISI "Sped-
Butlerib'II panels, fications for the Design of Light Gage Cold Formed Steel •
., Structural Members" and in accordance with sound engi-
; • B. Details shall be in accordance with the manufacturer's neering methods and practices,
drawings.
B. Panels shall be designed to support a 200-pound load
C. Installation shall be in accordance with the manufac- distributed evenly over a 2'square area centered between
turer's drawings. purlins without exceeding a panel deflection-to-span .
ratio of 1/180 in a two-span condition,
. II.PANEL DESCRIPTION
IV.PANEL MATERIAL
A. Panels shall be precision roll formed to provide a width
coverage of 3'. A. Panel material as specified shall be 26 or 24 gage galvan-
Ized steel (42,000 psi yield) 1.25 ounce coating (G90)
` 1. There shall be four major corrugations,1-1/2".high, conforming to ASTIVI Galvanized Specification A525 '
2.7/8" Wide tapering 1-9/32" wide at the top, (Latest issue). 1
spaced 12"on center. •
A-1. Panel material as specified shall be.026"thick Hi-Tensile '
2. There shall be two additional minor Vee corruga- aluminum, alloy 5154-1-118 mill finish conforming to I'°
tions, 1" wide, 1/8" high spaced 3" on center ASTM-B-209. Aluminum Ridge and Transition Panels
between the major corrugations. shall be.032"thick.
B. The panel side laps shall overlap one major corrugation. V.SEALANTS AND CLOSURES , '
1. One of the outboard corrugations shall be formed A. Sealant for side and endlaps shall be nominal 1/4"wide x
as the overlapping corrugation. 3/16" thick Butler-Panlastic which is a blend of butyl
elastomers and suitable inert fillers, It shy ll be asphaltic, �.
• • 2. The other outboard corrugation shall be formed as non-hardening, non-shrinking, non-staining, non-corro-
the underneath panel, sive and mon-toxic, The material shall remain workable
throughout a temperature range of 0°to 135°F.
�. a. This shall be a full corrugation to provide '
, bearing support to the side lap, B. Sealant for other closures and accessory items"shall be
provided in cartridge-package for application from a i
' a,,. b, This shall be formed with a continuous length caulking gun with hand applied prESSUre. This material ,
• ' sealant groove, shall be of the same formulation as the Panlastic except
having additional solvent, '
• C. The panel endlaps shall be 6''. .
• C, Closures shall match the panel profile and be installed at
• 1, Panels shall be of maximum length,up to 38'-9'',so accessorles as required to provide a weathertight
a as to minimize panel end laps, building.
e
2. When required,endlaps shall be engineered to occur II, Closures shall be synthetic,soft,moulded solid rub-
, over and be fastened to a secondary structural ber material of reclaimed and natural rubbers which
member. shall comply to ASTIVM-D-735;R3O2, ti
3. The upper end of all panels shall be marked for the 2, Closures shall be a lightweight, closed cell, pre-
proper location of endlep sealant, formed polyethylene foam material, .
D. Ridge panels when required shall be one-piece, factory D. Gable trim shall be fabricated from 26 gage galvanized
s curved to match the roof slope, steel, 1;25 ounce coating (G90) conforming to ASTM
A525(Latest issue),
. 1. Cross section of the ridge panel shall match the
roof panel. 1. Trim will be the Butler"Sculptured"configuration,
. 10}1/2" deep, two-tone Gray and White, The top
2. Ridge panel splices shall occur over the first purlin leg shall form a weathartight lap over the Butlerib
on either side of the building center. II: corrugation and the bottorri leg shall overlap the
' well panel.
R B, Eave panels shall extend beyond the building structural
line, 1.1 Trim will be the Butler "Contour" configuration,
i 4.7/8" deep, Slate Black,The top leg shall form a
P, Roof panels shell be factory pre-punched at panel ends weathertight lap over the Butlerib II corrugation
. . to match pre.punched holes in structural members, and the bottom leg shall overlap the wall panel,
Upper end of eaVe and splice panels will have 3/4" long
slots to provide for expansion and contraction of the
panels, (Optional)
e '
UT4E tiOmin MANNUFAGTURING GOM N
PAV �
5 tdrlH�'IQ�U
I
, • , O8N8gAL 01,1005 NANBA° WT.,' M19°OUNI-
Y,.
� Form No,2429-12-13,■rV
printed in U.S,A,
'. .' 4, • • , . .
. .. . .. ,
. '
. .
, ..
•
• .
. ,
• ,
. .
. 1
,.....,............_. ..._.....,....,...,.................,,,,,,,—„,_,,„,.,,,.,—,.. „.....„,____,,_,,,...........-1--,..,—...--...1.,,,,-.4..........,..,,,,,..,.......1,,,....4.....-..,,,,A ....,..........0...,..x.....-.....46.........1,,,a.c....,,—,........ ,..,..lir,4.1,14.11 7.....,.;.."..44...t.41.............,..4‘.,........0.,,..,..:`,4,....4 ", ', ,,,,,A-44,..,....,......,.......
..
.,,,
1
. . - .
SPECIFICATIONS
.•
. I •• .
. . . .1
. ' I, VI.FASTENERS VIII.PANEL APPLICATION (
A. Panel-to-Structural A. AO panels shall be factory cut-to-length according to the
,
b . erection drawings as furnished by Butler Manufacturing '
, 1. All connections of Butlerib II panels-to-structural Company. 1
members shall be made with 1/4- 14 ix 7/8"Type •
. ,
AB self-tapping, 3/8" hex-head screws with a 5/8" B. All panels shall be positioned and aligned to hold the 3' ,
. .
0,D.metal backed neoprene washer. module throughout the building length.
. ,
,
1,1 All connections of Butlerib II panels-to-structural C. All sidelaps will be at least one full corrugation. .
.
• members shall be made with galvanized steel,
.
dichromate dipped Butler Scrubolts,3/8"hex-head D. All endlaps will be at least 6"and fastened together over
with 3/4"metal backed neoprene washer. and to structural members, ,
1,2 All connections of Butlerib 11 panels-to-structural E. All panel side and end laps shall be sealed with Butler
members shall be made with Type 410 stainless Panlastic (weather sealing compound) to prevent the
. •
steel Butler Scrubolts plated with•0005"thick cad- entry of capillary moisture. ,
,
mium, 3/8" hex washer head with aluminum
backed neoprene washer. (Aluminum Panels) F. Fasteners shall be installed with proper tools, in a work-
man-like manner according to the recommendations of
. 1,3 All connections of Butlerib II panels-to-structural the manufacturer, ,
members shall be made with Butler self-clinching
. aluminum Lock-Rivets, 3/4" diameter low profile IX.ACCESSORIES
.
head with neoprene washer. ,
A. Accessories, i,e., ventilators, skylights, eave and gable
, . B, Panel to Panel trim, gutters, Jacks and curbs shall be as standard with
Butler Manufacturing Company, unless otherwise noted
,. .
1, All Butlerib U panel-to-panel connections shall be and furnished as specified, ,
made with 1/4 - 14 x 7/8"Type AB self-tapping,
• 3/8" hex head screws with a 5/8" 0,D. metal B. Location of standard accessories shall be as shown on
backed neoprene washer. erection drawings as furnished by Butler ManufactUring
Company,
, . 1,1 All Butlerib It panel-to-panel connections shall be ) „
Made with Butler self-clinching aluminum Lock-
,
•
Rivets, 3/4" diameter low profile head with neo-
, prone washer,
, .
C, Fastener location and quantity shall be as shown oh
,
II .
erection drawings as furnished by Butler Manufacturing A
Co. t .
•. ,
VII,PANEL FINISH
. '
A, The panel finish as specified shall be one of the fol-
lowing:
. .
, .
' 1. Galvanized steel-plain mill galvanized finish.
1.1 Galvanized steel -exterior surface pre-finished With
Butler Parchment,polyester color finish.
' Interior surface pre-finished with Butler Parchment, 1 ,
Modified alkyd color finish,
. 1,2 Aluminum, 026"hi-tensile-plain mill finish.
•
., .
,
i
,
SPECIPICATIONS
, 1.0....../..!......1.50.
OUTER MANUFACTURING CONIPAI*V
, chls.e.wu oPMICel), NANSAla PlY, 0+11a.SOURI
00 81JILER18 II 1300P SYSTEM 11
,. .
1 1
13dflat 13a.ilding Ptatilicts are aanstaniki baloa ItapraVad;,ihorottga, Die itifattnailati doh.: ,
. 1 talliad hatbln Is silbloct to Adage Witaddt aoilda. nature fltitillzlhs aralaat dotaIlsi add- 1
POthl No,24912-78 1 tabt YOU Obatest Millet Bilildort,dt flatlet MahUrsatiltldkdardashY fat 'utast larbtataildli, Printed in U,S4A,.
,
, . .
, t
. 1•• 1
.. a .._ ._..,. ,...:t..�,-.u.,l-„......a...�..,.�..»...•..:i.. ..:.ay.,1.«.•uw x,:..,..,,u...r.,.,4«n.u...::.a:....r...^.:.a .+«: a e 4r:i�,..,..�.1+.«,,.u_ ..�..v.,.,«„N, .:ac<� .._. .,.+.',,.,xl:.1u_......u-.,::w;a'..pJ....,:��•f:'wt-t.w ..iM,.,,w--r..,...,• .«4.J�«e..:,.:,«...1»:�.�4ir�,,w.�... ,n:«.u.-.+.-.. ...,+,_,:n,«C...,,�.:::trl.x,i:w.a. .
•
h Y�``
1
f
I ,
I r, r
I
7
IIy'','„'),''.1 4
I r, . BUTLERB®II
,
jr,. r,;
I, k k ” 'ir'; 1,i''';' uTLERID
„ . • ' I , ,1 • , , 111111' Wall Panel System
11
9
, i
■
. 4(”• S d ' ., . i
i .
' Three foot covering width
• Factory pre-punched or unpunched panels
1 !, , i available
1 1.; I, 1, .4 ; , ! ; ;
,
, . ' ; ` ' • • I Precision roll formed
� i' i
2
i {1 s , 1 • Factory-applied color finishes.
II 1 • Distinctive design configuration
- , I' • ,, ?i ,1 , )_,,.w '`' : • Superior fastening systems
rljr' 4 4', kW
:.. .. n 1, '{
"
I +
j
1
I I •
12•, I � 1��, I, I''�"
{
1 '4 f •ICI)
I I
I,
i
1
I
v
•
I
PANEL.CROSS SEi0�"Ibl�
I I
I I
MATERIAL LOADING
Available in 24 and 26 gage galvanized steel and 0.032'i Wall system is designed for wind loads up to 25 lbs psf in . "
aluminum, Galvanized steel materials are available with standard loadings.
plain unfinished surfaces or with factory-applied color
. finish systems, Aluminum is not available with factory= '
applied color.
FINISH FASTENERS
26 Gage Galvanized Steel -- Butler-Tone Finish System or Panel to Structural-- Hex Washer Head iScrubolts
Plain Mill Finish, (Lock-Rivets optional):
24 Gage Galvanized Steel Plain Mill Finish, Panel to Panel—No, 14 Type A-B,Self Tapping Screws
.032"Aluminum-}'Hammered Embossed. (Lock-rivets optional)
. . (
1
' I P l�T bE SuRIPi
ION� � E SUTLER MANUFhCTURFNd CbMyANV I
RD KANSA, CITV MI0 USI
BUTLERUE IT WALL SYSTEM
I II
I I I I
4
P'Ylr�ted in U.S.A., , F-oY1ri.Na, 416.,i2.73 _
1.
I ;
. . , .
, . . • ,
. * , • , , . • .
, .
- .
• : ,
. , .
. .
. .
' .
••
. , . .
,
• •
.
,
, .
' . SECTION PROPERTIES FOR ONE FOOT OF WIDTH
DESIGN WEIGHT E(ksii) Fy(kSi) Sx 60) I(in.4 Sx Iin.3)COMPRESSION ON OUTSIDE COMPRESSION ON INSIDE
' ,
.' PANEL MATERIAL -
1 HICKNESS (0FT.) I (in.4)
/
26-ga.Galv.Steel .0198 1.14 29,500 42.0 .0539 .0691 .0487 .0404 \
.
24-ga.Galv,Steel ,0257 1.45 29,500 42.0 I .0742 .0932 .0668 .0577 .
,032 Aluminum ,0320 0.55 10,000 21.5 .0991 .1171 .0889 .0896
. . Note: Section Properties have been calculated in accordance with the 1968 A,I.S.I.Specification. . .,
. .. ALLOWABLE UNIFORM LOAD (PSF)'
,
,
• 1
SPAN=5.0' SPAN=7,0' SPAN=7.5'
NUMBER OF
PANEL MATERIAL sp„,,,,
.,
,
. ral"- P S P S P S .
___
, - ,
ONE 49 44 25 22 22 20 , '
. ,
26 GA.
• . GALV.STEEL
TWO 44 49 22 25 20 22
.
THREE 55 61 28 31 24 27
, ONE 67 60 34 31 30 27
*
' 24-GA.
GALV.STEEL
. TWO 60 67 31 34 27 30
.
.
THREE 75 84 38 43 • 34 37
. , ONE 46 41 23 21 20 18 • .
.. 032
ALUMINUM TWO 41 46 21 23 18 20
.,
„ THREE 51 57 • 26 29 23 25
- -
. .
NOTE: 1. Legend-P=Pressure on Outside Face.. S=Suction or Outside Face.
, 2. All valUes have been increased 1,33 as a'llowed by Section 3.1,2 of the 1968 A.I.S,I.Specification.
• .
BUTLEIll B II WALL --0. BUTLERIBil WALL
(
• .
METAL CLOSURE-., BASE ANGLE METAL CLOSURE-- BASE ANGLE
• ', - 1 - 1
. ,
_.......1,:.Fr,„...• .,..,•0•..,.o::
0..• l- FLOOR EDGE OF F..,i-6 ,,''
6• ,•' LOOR
.0 , . LI NE FOUNDATION :', ,
LINE
NE
• , 1.1.7...:
-,, EDGE OF 2" STRUCTURAL LINE .
FOUNDATION -'0•1
(STRUCTURAL LINE) .
■
BASE DETAIL BASE DETAIL .
scalo: 1-1/2"=1'-0" (NOTCHED)
DESIGN LOADS FASTENERS .
Standard as 15, 20, or 25 pounds per square foot wind Hex washer head Sdrubolts for )ianel-to,structural and No,
load, special loadings can be provided or on special order 14, type A-0,self-tapping screws for panel-to-1)8nel connec- .
- basis, tiOhs,Optional Lock-rivets available,
MAXIMUM LENGTH: 38'91' TRANSITIONS
, , Designed for transition to Butler Well Systems and other
COVERAGE: 36 inche8 materials, .
■ e"""'",, '"
...i OUTLEP,, BwLTALE R m,A 4 u e AG t u l t No c o,o p A N v . . T ECHNICAL INP OR NIAT ION
oN.6.t.c ,.. ,AN.A c, . ..c.. BuTLERIB i WALL SYSTEM
.
, .
Printed In
.. Mg ireltiliiiiint i'illdruettt'iglhVingsoutaliotbit'itigultniV"ttilelifariee'the itentIgittlfg! ;4" '
..
Form,1)1a.24i 6-12-tO taut your ooarott thitliii• suitor 1 ot sutler VarAotullgro doloillairfYilo,riautocii ihruru:461:,
4 . fit
( ' ■
,
t1
I
' SPECIFICATIONS
I. GENERAL a. Exterior color as specified shall be from I
standard Butler colors as applicable. }:
Exterior walls shall be covered with precision roll formed
• Butlerib U® panels as furnished by Butler Manufacturing b. Interior color shall be Butler Parchment
' Company and installed in accordance with the manu-
facturer's instructions. 3. Aluminum—hammered embossed surface.
• II. PANEL DESCRIPTION
A. Panels shall be 3' wide with 4 major corrugations VI. PANEL APPLICATION •
1-1/2" high 12" on center with 2 minor corrugations
between each of the major corrugations the entire A. Structural System shall be plumb before wall panels .
length of the panel. are attached. .
B. Panels shall be one piece from base to building eave. B. Panels shall be aligned �ndattachedin accordance with
erection drawings furr(shed by Butler Manufacturing ''
C. Maximum panel length shall be 38'9". Company.
D. The upper end of galvanized steel and aluminum C. All side laps shall be at least one full corrugation.
. panels shall be fabricated with a mitered cut on the
major'corrugations which will form a closure as it fits D. Panels shall be sealed at the base with metal closures.
into the major corrugations of the roof panels. (Pun- (Optional)
shed panels with Butlerib It roofs only), or
E. The bottom end of the panels shall be straight cut. Panels shall be sealed at the base with foam closures.
e (Optional) 1
F. Wall panels shall be factory pre-punched at panel ends
and shall match pre-punched holes in structurals for VII. FASTENERS
proper alignment.(Optional)
Ill. PANEL DESIGN A. Butlerib IC wall panel-to-structural connections shall
be made with hex washer head Scrubolts, Panel-to-
panel connections shall be mad
Panel design shall be in accordance with AISI "Specification e.with No. 14, type
A-6 self-tapping rJrew
for the Design tyf Light-Gage,Cold Formed Steel Structural s, (L�c�-Rivets are optional for
Members, and in accordance With sound engineering panel-to-panel dtructurzi and/or panel-to-panel con-
methods and practices, sections.)
B. Lock-Rivets (optional) shall be set by a special Lock-
pq/' iV. PANEL MATERIAL Rivet tool. •
Panel material as specified shall he 26 or 24 gage galvanized C. Fastener locations shall be as shown on erection
' steel (ASTM Galvanized specification A525 Latest issue,1.25 drawings as furnished by Butler Manufacturing
ounce coating (G90) Company.
OR
First cualit Alclad 3003 aluminum, H274 temper,0.032" D. Plastic color caps to match wall color shall be fur-
' thick y nished for all exposed locations of fasteners. G`i.,
lik' V. PANEL FINISH VIII. ACCESSORIES '
. A. The panel finish as specified shall be one of the fol- A, Accessories, Le.. doors, windows, louvers, shall be as
• lowing: standard with Butler Manufacturing Company. unless
otherwise noted,and furnished as specifi,,,I,
1, Galvanized Steel •— plain mill galvanized finish. '
•
B. Standard accessory locations shall be as shown' on
2. Galvanized Steel -pre-finished on both surfaces erection drawings as furnished by butler Menu-
,
, with the Butler-Tone Finish System, facturilig Company.
• 1
•
( ,
BUTLERfM TI WALL SYSTEM
}/ ry BUTLER'MANU�iQCTUi4INO;COMPANY. .. �. ....
• y�`,�I/-�rt 0 i 012N8OIAL OFFIC.e HANSA;CITY MIB90,1141 _.. ,
i
Sp�CIFaCI�T QII�S
tsutlor null In products ert' Cnnstan lining i�,{draueri, 4 ere drat the In ar�,at n con'
{ a{ delta g eon-
,
Be tan the Ina pr Ck ��I n
dd U ietl, �n 1
tdtitad hard in �a subt ct to Itaneo w��d t n l
For Na.�245t7
Printed in U.S.pI, tart:MO udard5t Butlot 9ui�lier�or HutlnrMenufanturinedompapy fun oust Infnrmniidn, m N 2450-12-73
. ( .
.
: ...
... „ K.«.;a.r�,.d�i.w,y 1.,«,: =i�.M=: J'r� •�»..,wAti..J L.,nilh:�iiwi r.,+'.�
vaiX3�»t;i;i,;u «.,.aL::«...,. w.�,..» �m. a;w..:cr.:.a,.. ,,.«r.»,.>«t:w�.�'.,...�1.,:.,.�5..:»:A,m�. ...�......,z..�....S�;xLl a:aa.,«,w«:.:i..
BUTLER TONE EXTERIOR WALL PANEL
■
COLOR � SELECTIONS �
I
1
BUTLERIB ', PARKWAY®, MONOPANL® AND F.103® �
t
' 2 GAGE
2 6 G GE 2 6 GA GE 24&2 6Gg^E
I
t
•
,
` ' i .L t YI4v�� ‘e,, s rf'P'i k rC F�{ Ri Wl,, 1 R Iw,71 M '.3h.
;..,3,1.,,,..J'1 a ,+4 Lf1ta fchrt ;311 01 i 1M 1u ry( sf A'Ir ,' 9;2k 1 1
r hl 1 S+ i�h b lrr f tal yr�s1
, ;t ,R r rui'1�Ir a i1�12',1h4,,,,,'',J l,yt"tt9` r,,,,, Y p r ti r a}+.r 9•
,`,",,•,4�k 4lfr¢rr` Y^IJV,{w�;t yk:��Fk., 1L',_,, ‘ `rt l':••.•rj 3.'•• ,�•
1rs 1 + dr d'1' j*
1 1 r�{ t�rrl f�"1�r i il'r 1✓i
.q.,::1•',!..•;'fs L'ii`:" "'r3i�# i'IFr'r;� ,k,r11 IM ft "3';',•'3 / i,';',',,,,,4 rr•„4iF'•�.,, - 5( {- 3, 1 tr'1 lr •1'.,s,,,,3,.,::" i' . 3 t ,
1 r' s ✓t,lfi } ,1 n1,ij } tI, 1 1!"',11?{ ,.1 y� y'r',',.,r 1'
- " •'‘.4'':''''' iKir+rl,R t4' At ♦'.l"s'1 , f11--,, I 'i ,1: j',$ (.
�^ 1 ,` Sli.1 y "far 1.iIyU 7dl l-i' r K'-a iics' �11� �, �1-i ?�'',:,1:,,,,,,,.,1);,,, : ,,4,1,-
,:•S Yt, i1� i�rlc
�,rol j'• yrtty iri 0�w,1 .41, I+ 1'''�. ql r -1� r�) it yf l�ff r � Y,�-y I'
r v r r,
ra r Z ! r•r 11hi,Y,,1.ir41f I t U 7 1a.w I'1 7,L41s r {" +1�,.jr
y. Fj■,{''H rr le M 04, r 1∎•;;",l } in, Iltt',1,�: ".,`,,L'''..,`' :',,,,i,.'„','',' Y a
1 r'•+' 4'd! yrtr J Ns',4Fi4P 1 v r. e'ttr .' 6 V 1i ' `
} 4 „�{ q4�r }( rl 11��#��j i1 ��'�, iSty 'T A '(� � t1 , '{ �sl ' Y
.� ,. d 3 )41 iA Iv S� rJtvti rt 1 't ,;','(‘'','`,;'''I''''''''',';1,;,:.'4,..('''..,',';'
1 C 1
,.;;„1,4A0,1;',"1„la wlj �1yM� ro I r�ir ty l �r 'rr 11l f Y try A
1,,,,:;;,,,,. 'k'h r r l'4,,„,1,•',1,^#4,41;, wl 9V v c{de- ri, I•i
,i''1,;;..1•1....-.'; 1', 1{llf ,-,,,t,, ;,' ,,r„r11"'^, i(,,'','r�ti x-H✓,Itr tl lA '`4r"14,•"..,.� '. t��t,., t
• '.1•,ro f"';h4 i14.i F•l4r9f Birk,11 r1RV"auy,tr r,t...l „,.,,•1;,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,,,,..4,,,,,,,,,:,1 , ,1 •
. N ;, k tl 2r 1 4 �r ) ° 1'11 �
1�,��11'F ,,tnr,i lr+{ 4., f9v{'�j+y�'�r r� i'�rP� �ji�'1F�1a� � 1i ,�� �� �,`r z 1i �M 1f yar: r+•
1i1 If 1 � ',;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1 tVy'1 i,e,pltai'' i ri 3hP Inr a �w(�� 2
', , o- ..'�`•'�: ' 1” i,{r'4 q,'.1ll)i i,Y.ly t rl,,1} ,, „ ,� ,yl� ,, 'y,..l� sA� 11 r i,.S 4¢•^ .��... s t 1'','1,,",',,,k,;,lf 'j,'lixrl r'� Jr1 t IZ,,,,/ 711 jil A ! '1'", t1 !Y i^1 E
ii c1 f�� 'A ! 7 r Y Fr 1{' !�
', , ' ,,, N"fVfa 'd r it 'i t,1 rA„tin I „...-1,,,,,. '4 ' l �4 �..
• � 1,,,,,,,1,;•,,,,),,,. ', f .,4� , l. sS, e , r t w
s t „,,,,,,,,,,ii; d ��K ' M i Ei
. ro I,t.r-,�1 f�1,h.,1•• �I,',i�i,t A t I' t :1.1,:,(').'',4'11}i'.4'.. 1y51
,`” ,,,/,r f ,,, q rvr rI,,n i ;1',,,,l,',''''''''''''''';'( trur 4?,', 1'• 1'i•f '1 1' fi 31 7 1i ',t';',1',.,‘,,,,,,..... { ` , Q 1 {y ,.
w.t �! �1 '",, �•y Y r ht �Y rVl W E✓'� +�/ 1h �'
'' • 'l, w rl � .1 r 1 r,'•
, . ' � ,�� < 1. t i 1 ff ±,1771,,i,�, �1 1,,,,;',.,%,-;••,,'''4.,,.'1,‘ r 1 1il �t�l§'.
4 ,I,�S,,I A,'1, t r q'�,l'it;,t,' �'I1'i 4 v(;1 Ita�04it.' , M rll,r
e � , 'l∎k?6'1,4,..,,■∎f �, t7'il;r}le t4 a '''''t 'ti rq'N r;,,.',',•,,,riy! 1'�
ti X I r .; i
:1'i ',,f f r ii l 1 6 1 •t rr t l j ,il.+i 'ro,''is till''':'1'}1 t a s,
• y' 1 �'F y r. ,i,r 7b�1,. 1� ) f,Ik 111P r �( e'
M BURNISHED GOLD BRONZE ANTIQUE GOLD SAGE GREEN GREE N
Not available on Parkway, Monopahl not available in r
26 gads.
i
■
r ,
♦
�
t
w r
• n ry 1,
•
I i
4 ti k
•
'
GULF BLUE, PARCHMC( r I,
Moridpahl hot'available in
26 gage, 1'
1
0
1T Ihte for eoldr of all vali p O ha IA
1 3 1 0 i.
AC.6,7 Prlrstad In U4s.b� r I•
•
.,:,,.: '``3_..4.1":..-«:.-..?,._:..-,'uww.....,,,A,.....,1,4,∎.-4a...:x...+144+.u44,,,,:::aw,4,1.4.-4.1.4 4.44∎44 4.4,..:w..b..,,,,ti=.u::lt..1 xt..l'J:nf•,.t.as:...:,,.aws...1.4 4,:.Y,.44,-.7.A.1.....,....314. 4.1.,......
Q.
BUTLER -TONE I , , .
, , .
. , 1
0 ,
G .. r
, ..- . , ,
. .
_ . ,, , . . ..., ,, iliiil ,r, : .. , , :-„. •
. . ,
. ,, . , . ,
. . .
. , , •
, .
7
, „ . , , . ,
. ,
.s. ,, 4111,,,,,,~i{lu, , .
g� A 1 I I
.,a ri,V NI 1t tt*q 3qt,/l l'-?: 001 ilill I Illtlllttl (Ii11I"1111111 I c'' y � III II, '•
,, I. . �h.' Irlx � �, 1, r, ,ill ,t
II�IIII
}} l� '4t 1 ',r;, �� t,tit�li , 1 1;,: ∎10,1„ I`•I 11 .
,II V1 1,i' ,VS I,.,u!aN',a1 @iI i4,1:V"`'ittII;n Pur4f:mSa °,�1:1 i �� F , 111i, II(1h. �, till'
III
11 Ilt. 11111 r I
1 ' 1C f dlllll .,■1111• ,.I,tnllhl �111I11
i '. .,.. I .rte '
• SIGNS CAN BE EMPHASIZED,
AGAINST CONTRASTING BACKGROUND •1 1 ,
NI : , 111
..
.' r. �� 1
. tilt.% l a; .4.. . t. }
•v'e D l s • 4d
�^i,, ' • t~' a'I 1 il�
t � r,' fr 7
. [1•r �� y
)
'
� � l
FASCIA COLORS ARE PLANNED ' i'u ••, p 1 COLOR COMPATIBILITY
FOR COMPATIBILITY .;t : r •1, : .t 't.,
; , r, ' „�'_ IS BUILT-IN .
Butler Tone color finishes were developed r, 0 I ,. I to be compatible with each other and with
• .i � ;��� the natural earth colors of brick, wood,
'�.� stone, arid other building materials, Also
VERTICAL COLOR AREAS UNIFY DESIGN compatible with the color system are the
black mullions of Vista Waif” and the
black accent mullions for Parkway 212V
walls and accessories, •
Butler Tone colors are best displayed with ,
•
CO p��lBL "°° `'�1 ° { ii simplicity, Color change or variation may
r,"� i ;,i� ,^,,}�' g
Y iG4�. ,'," be used to express changes In materials
COLOR COMBINATIONS 1 7tfx la `i'ilae ,',.' or to call attention to important features ,
I M, 1�_ ,t.l=i, such as entryways.
.
Door s and windows can be accented and
transformed Into a simplified long vertical
PARCHMENT • • • • strip' instead of becdming visual distrac- ';
tions in a wall expanse. Unlike the effects
of randomly placed contrasting color strips,
BRONZE .`', " ;•:. Ir;, • • • • • matching color pahels placed above door
;.3 openings and above and below glass areas
k,�41,7'k.„,, provide a unifying expression of architecu
' ANTIQUE GOLD f,,,j,!'"4..e.r`l!'hit:1,., • • ° • tural elements,
„, ,, i~r,,,, ACCENT COLORS
BURNISHED GOLD y,:Y'�,' rd:∎ le et e
'�.� .rr�. The basic wall colors are especially effec, •
tine When highlighted With these Butler
, ' �
' SAGE GREEN al 0 accent Dolor s,
't a�, . ;r' .�;�
• cation, i�.
pints or gallons Available In� ants na fat' field app,
GULF BLUE o 0 • " " PoPPY ELECTRA SLATE
RUSSET' RED BLUE.' BLACK
.
Rorm No 13.1 b Prlritsd in 11:5,A.
I
... .... ` + tl