SDR3-75 POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
.1 r � r 1 f 1{s{ 1 1 1 r. { r 1 '' 1!t ,+
•
; 40(0 ,Rr. Anµ CRAY &, COMPA.N`Yr ' t t : tt �. ,
'PHASE £Z &{ t''""n.,.D w51T,S i PDAN` {.
Site{'.,:t7eve1apnri�,'Review (,SD, 75..) :a
t + { n''-n.' , t 7ta
f .-agard IndUe4ttit1 Lack ;',
•
1%
• '
92 'S1'rTiga; S , e `,, ,
ti ,!.1 j rr l
1' 7 rr 5
r J 1 r.l...L .1r4.H .r 4. .. .. u{.if.
•
•
I
rl
I
i
•
I
r
•
•
r I '
°
1 is
M
•
1
1
i t'' . ■ ..%, '.i,)1 ' . 4%
•
i
i
M '
F
�I
f
1 r
,
1M4. ..
rul.sw.+, ..v.iSA✓ .`.-5 w.... ,.sb..,fF..L`n .V.,.ar :UC,
/laaaJhOm IIt\."
J
\,
CITYOFTIQARD
June 23, 1983 WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON ,,
, I F
R.A• Gray ,
,
/ R.A. Gray Co.
l
�. 4
45 S.W. Ti
edemas
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Dear Mr. Gray,
It h a s come
to the
City of
Tigard d Planning
Staff's
s Ott ention that
' - condition number 6 of SDR 3-75 has not met. The Site Design Review (SDR
3-75) was brought before the City's Architectural
I
Review Board on February 20,
j.
1975. The application for Site Design Review was submitted by R.A. Gray
Company for property located at 9920 S.W. Tigard Street. The condition reads
as follows:
6. Developer submit landscape plan for whole development and work toward
cs Implementation.
After al filed investigation and a review of the file, it is a
staff that the landscaping has never been completed.
' pparen
t to
Please e contact the Department of
p Planning
g and Development tqxth a specific I .
the condition Proposal for meeting � p 5 00 P.M.P!«M on July 1, 1983. If You
have ;'any o u mseetx: 'tiara rior tol
n ondx
y q tion6, you may contact myself or Bill Monahan, Director of
Planning and Development.
Sincerely,
•
Ii
Eli'.zacteth A. Newton
Associ_: t
a
'planner I
�
I ,
d'
A��r
m'°
0076
� P
12755 S+W,ASH P,O, SoX 28397 11GAki7,( REGON 97223 OH:
'�-�� � r 89i4171
C, , .
S
r*0
r • I r
•
■
•
♦ i k::' ..i; _ ,.„1 4a.1.'...1J na.R4.F.. ..11:•w •.W..«n t ^ .
�
, a Y, '111•° d , , die i I ,e
LANDSCAPING PERFORMANCE BOO 1 .
i t N t
'J KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PitES NTS: That we, ' ' .
as Principal, 'arid ,:
ri p .1 ... a B.I catt _ - a corporation qualified
•
r
. and authorized to do surety business in the State of Oregon, as Surety, are'":
held acid firmly bound'I unto the City of TI�,GARDOregon, a municipal „`
1,;=`,1,',..,
1 ' , corporation, in the sum of Two Thousand .....'($),,, .•....:�) .,
lawful money of the United States of America, for the payment' of which, well ,
r and truly to, be rnaeie, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, r : • ' '
- .o- I, successors and e,ssigns, ,jointly and Severally f ,rznly by these ,presents. ,: n '
y ' Taff; CONDI9.1ION O F TtiE ABOVE CB LIG TIUN IS SUCH, THAT
;.'
I
Ir
i WHEREAS, the Board of Design Review of the City of 4„q, •g ,,,,M, „ "''
' has approved a 1an idscapng plan submitted by the above–named principal in.
I
5. connection with: .; ' s- a w ' .
•
r
WHEREAS, said approval by the Board of Design Review was.,granted, • ` ,, .
' i' subject to full compliance by the Principal with the conditions, if any, listed on ,
•s-N I fLl Exhibit "B"", attached'hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. ',
NOW, THEREFO1 E, if the Principal herein shall faithfully and truly •
observe and comply in all respects, within six months after the date of °
• ' occupancy as shall be determined by the
as shall. be extended, b,•
• , with the terms, conditions and, provisions of the said laridscaping I,plan eta °A• k l the conditions specifieu by the said ,Board of Design BevN.ew, and shall indemnify .
ti ." and save harmless the City of , its officers, ennployees, and agents,
” againot any direct or indirect damages of every kind nuid de,�crL ption that '
shall; be suffered, or claimed, to be suffered in connection. durin the performance
I
1 of said work, and shall in all respects perform said work according to laws
then this''obli i ation s to be void; otherwise it shall remain in full force atad effect
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we, the above bounded parties, have hereunto '
975.w, ...�.,.. r ,
* set our hand,, and seals this 6th dad of ...�..��- _' 1' .' . I
1 PRINCI"
A.. G,- ' & Co.
o Name `
w � y www By Ta t lej l 1
,
i''';',,1 tt77fri Y" P I in.
SURE J 1.0,',,,i,','., 1 y io q r r
y'� i?��i'' �i W�':l i G�y l�l it ,dt�� I'Y
) . . '4 S. ''i i P5
"y o„ 0,,o,,,, , M 9 /l!y,, I7A.� t Name ni Ye. Pa, #; .. ♦• '- R t+! " 1 ;q rk A•" •
ill
• - . ♦ 1y'y .d° o p -1 ' T'.'i te.... yu a r. -.4,R�'f;a:(�.` "y•
, --4 'l' '"'P+r e s s 00-,04..,E.,,,,,, ;• Y'� t '.,y° .'" M`.,,, W' :I
.
Cityy Po^!l and St-Ite Ore ♦a Malik » '. 5,1)2 ,:,•
APPRO1TID, 4
I
YI >d ' "x
T,y^ �,N , � „W T r Il aw I i��
- y�.,« .--1 1
' (?1ahni.ng' Diroctor) 1 !---):43:14'''?' •y,
•
r
.. it � ..,
I I
I
1 ,
r +
rnw•i..rri.+M•:++i.:n: tir. ,wN+M«+.+li.+.wr..,:.r.•�r•r,
(City Attorney.)
I
n " ^ / C x N
•
1
• v n:.t..i vt iW...:..:l:r..l .{n,.14. F40..:aJ....w.+l,..-..,:. xl..:�l}., uLJ„IC .
, a. ,UNITED :'A.CIFIC I T 7' ,ANcE COMPANY
1
. . HOME OFFICE, TACOMA, WASHINGTON
POWER OF ATTORNEY ,
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That the UNITED PA
State of VliCIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY,a cor organized under the laws of the
poration duly organize
R. B.1 B. NEIGHBOR of PORTLAND, OREGON`-- --. _-- -- '
its true and .
lawful Attorney ih fact,to,make execute,seal and deliver for and on its behalf,and as its act and deed -
ANY AND '
AN ALL BONDS AND N SURETYSHIP
UNDERTAKINGS
and to bind the UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY thereby N b
r as ,
s ful the :
fully and
Y y to th� same extent as if such bonds and undertakings and other
writings obli atory in the nature and hereby UNITE()PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY and sealed and attested
• g 9 ture thereof were signed by an Executive Officer'of the
' .`? by one other of such officers; n h reby ratifies and confirms all that its said may do in pursuance hereof.
This Power of Attorney is granted under and by authority of Section 37A of the By-Laws of UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE
which rovisions are now in full'force and effect,reading as follows:
�'.i COMPANY w p :
g r
' SECTION 37A '-ATTORNEYS-IN-FACT
SECTION 1. The Board of Directors, the'President, or any Vice-Presiderit`or Assistant Vice-President shall '
h I I have power and authority ,
I� a a
Y l 1 appoint •
Attorneys-in-fact and to authorize them to execute on behalf of the Company,bonds and undertakings,.recognizances,contracts of indemnity and a her
writings obligatory in the nature thereof,and(b)to remove any such Attorney-in4f att at any time and revoke the power and authority given to him,
1," sECTION 2, Attorneys-in»fact shall have power and authority, subject to the terms and limitations of the power of attorney issued to them,to execute
'' and deliver on behalf of the Company,n bonds and
, undertakings,recognzanre ,contracts of indemnity and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof,
corporate is not necessar y for the of any bonds and u ndertakings,recognizances
;
contracts of indemnity and other Writings
in' the nature thereof, 1
I;>
- , This power of attorney is signed and sealed by,facsimile under and by authority of the tollowing Resolution ado tc,d by the Board of Directors t ctors of
UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY at a meeting held on the 26th day of October, 1971,at which a quorum was present,'and said Resolution
has not been amended or repealed;
I
Ived, that the signatures of such directors and officers and the seal of the Com ah may be affixed to any such o
Reso p y y p wer of
attorney or any certificate relating thereto by facsirile, and any such power of attorney of certificate bearing such facsimile
d - ' signatures or facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company and any such power so executed and certified by
facsimile signatures and facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company in the future t■rith respect to any bond or'
•
undertaking to which It is attached/'
' IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the UNITED PACIFIC INSURANC:f;COMPANY has caused these presents to he signed by its Vice-President,and its corporate
seal to be hereto affixed,this�lottl day of September 19 7 '
..�.� UNITED PACIFIC INSURA NCE COMPANY
�w
Washington lggp,,
. STATE OF g � ' � � EXeCta.t�,Vt3 1/ice-President
COUNTY OF Pierce ss, 'M.,4rNrNn�a,
P;t.{,�1.�"`G� NNIIIli1111i1µ
• 16th day of, September 75,personally appeared�n this I ,19, d MORRIS ,IJ• I3RU ,
to me known to be
the Vice Ire iden eof the UNITED I5ACiFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, end
' acknowledged that he executed and attested the foregoing Instrurnent'arid affixed the seal of said corporation thereto,and that Section 37A,Section 1 ,'
and 2 of the By-Laws of said Company and the r-tesolution,set forth therein,are still in full force,
My Commission Expirest .tA'c`
d'tr*'�iu '":0t i y____.
January' 15 19 _78 ° v0-,- ,,(..pe;orAp,,,i4;,,,,,t, Notary Public in and for State of W t� �.tra o>tl
i4i '",'I of \� Residf ng at .Eid°Intl Irl a ,
I D Keith ol�nsd.n , Assistant Secretary of e
h UNITED PACIFIC A IFfC INSURAN E
above and fore Ding is a COMPANY,do hereby certify that the
g true and correct cosy of a Power of Attorr':Iy'executed by said UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY,which Is stilt in full
u . :, force and effect,;
IN WITNESS WHE OECiF,I have hereunto,set my hand and affixed the seal of said.Company thus day oi`._._. , ,1S,i....., . '
yy uiby r J..':.��
U'' As° :'t Secrete
^
n
W t1DU dS1 ED .
1 +Gl7�f_ w d
t}kld�4t,
r
•
T THE liTNA CASUALTY AND S I'
. ��, a i CONTRACT STATUS REPORT SURETY COMPANY L+,
a Hartford, Connecticut 06115 ' ,1
- Hart ,
LIFE&CASUALTY
}
Date this Notice Mailed C,'^`L'obex 3, 1975
1
City of Tigard '
12420 SIT Maas, f
."igard, Oregon 97223 1 '
,
• . L A t o Building Ia spec-bion oept. `J
JiLn B ''
Bond No, 42 SB 10996 $ 2,000. ._'Date of Bond 6 773: '
(2 BOA Amount of Bond ? 000. �. �.
Name of Principal — It. A. Gray & Goo
Address i 'ca?d, O 'egotl
•
: Description of Contract landscaping Place II of TigE d Induebnial Park
According to our records, contract for which above bond was given should be completed about fall of. 1970;
'
• - Kindly furnish partictilars indicated below.
ADDRESS YOUR REPLY ON THIS SHEET TO Yours truly,
AETNA CAoiJA{.TY & SURETY CO.
„ •• 12Oi r . W. 1'"',h AVE. THE (ETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY I'
r ,
� PORTLAND, ry
POR1thr♦ND, 'r«,o i o;'205 ' f -r-, r
By
Vicki NTick.tolson Attorney-in-Fact
PARTICULARS REQUESTED
Original Contract Price $ >0
, " Additions to Contract
Total
Deductions from Contract ♦ . . . • . $
;,, Total Contract Price$
Payments received to date , ♦ ♦ , . . ♦ ,
Earned Estimates due ♦ . x x x x . $
Retained Percentage Withheld . . . , ♦ . , . . . Total$ I1'
Amount of Contract U e(..npleted $ i i
If Contract Not Completed, probable date of Completion is
I
if Contract Corripleted, please state Date of Acceptance `;i
i
•
a
. Date, , 19, ,. Signature 4 : 1
.
s« s
L ,
C�#IIV'I"fib i,N Us,Ax ,-;
•
,
• Wil �,FYffq, 171.,5
•
, n
,
x
M1
r
March 60 19
Mr. Bob ra
R. A. Gray & Co
• 114
Tigardip, Oregon 97223
File No. SD -75 - Tigar
Dear Mr. Grail
This s . tt officially notifies you that your project proposal
4 approved by the Tigard Site Development and ►e Review w Board at
their regular meeting on Pebruary 20, 19750 subject to the o11ow.
ink, CQ di ions
,; present devtlopment0 to include
location nes of parking spaces.. curbs. walkwaYs.
luminaires. Iota lines. vegetation. buildings. utiUti s
ti drain$t sake areas, loading areas cxc, sprinkler er system.
2. Vacation of Co F.d. 893 is accomplished
Permit may be granted.
building
3. Condition of CU 5. 72 and V -72 as confirmed fi; in '; ' and
Ordinance 72 are mete
I I;
4. Provisions of
, with respect to perMitted
►
of proscribed uses or by application for Conditional use
where the use is conditionally acceptable.
° . l3. ' + . propose. building, Tigard ICI. is shortened 10- r
or ours .rc a 'back to
provide provide in access to r ear
adequate sight clearance around bu 1din corner.
to contaot this o if ioe You have 4,ny questions
need additional it or a jo
Jerald L F'ow*110 A
o
1
kt.1 I:
I k ,
' I
r .
( march 5 1975
'r.) b Gray.
•r 'ay at Cc
1144,5 Tiedemein M.
Tigardp Oregon 9722
D -' 5 Tigard Industrial.
Dear Mr. Gr'ay
", This letter offioially notifies
, was approved by the' Tigard Site Development and Design Review
Board at iz 1)aeetirig o I,.Pehruary 200 1975. ,
Please 1001 free to contact this of rice ,. You have anY questions
or need additional information.
•
is
sincorely$
6 Powell 0 $00 '
y4
'1
•
.7: .!A-.,•-.. „iu i...-...,_0.,-r,..ak„,...A.s: .,....,..,a.,.i_...vu...::,:1.a,r..t...1..Ew,a„...a...,.,'.u.:J r,:P...,...-:;,s.aa,r„r.tp
. 9 S
! a
AGENDA
TIGARD SITE DEVELOPMENT & DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
"'' Regular Meeting February' 20, 1975
Twalit ' Junior H --si h School Lecture Room
14650 SW 97th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon
Meeting g time: 3 4: 0 .m.
•
Pi
Lr
f..
1. CALL TO ORDER
2 ROLL CALL
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
4.
SITE DESIGN & ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW !
4.1 "McDonal..ds'” (SDR 6-75)
A request for site design and architectural review of a proposed
franchise fast i'ood.s restaurant at SW Pacific Highway and School
Street
4.2 "Tigard Industrial Park" (SDR 3-75)
v . A request for site design and architectural review of a proposed r
light industrial building in an industrial, park (Tigard Industrial
Park) located at 9920 SW Tigard Street. '
5. OTHER BUSINESS •
•
5.1 John Setniker has requested a pre-design conference cod.- ,
ce,rning his proposed auto repair shop on S. W. Pacific Highway.
. 6. ADJOURN VE NT
j , Ski
I •
t , '11. A . .. ..O •w..-...... ,.•!l:rw,w,.+«..r=»wex"w J. 4 _ ! ' . •.. a ,,. 'tf ,....,. ., ,.....a+ ,
w
I a
,, MINUTES
,, TIGARD SITE DEVELOPMENT & DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
February 20, 1975 .-. regular meeting
Twality Junior High School - Lecture Room
14650 SW 97th Ave. , Tigard, Oregon ?
1. CALL TO ORDER: 4:45 p.m - chm. Bartel
2. ROLL CALL: members present: Bartel, Cook, Edin, McMonagle, Waken;
r staff Powell
OF
�m
meeting of
O� MINUTES: Minut of �'ebruar 13 were n
APPROVAL Minutes 5 yet y 5 g'
et available
4. SITE DESIGN at ARCHITECTURAL ''REVIEW
4.1 McD
o xn,a l d.s SDR 6-75
. . A request for site design and architectural review of a proposed I '
franchise fast foods restaurant at '`SW Pacific Hwy. and School St.
A. Staff Report: (see attached)
B. Applicant's Presentation:
1. Larry Haugset ((Norris, Be gg s & Simpson) asked for clari -
r
fication of staff findin g #4 c & e.
ate
2. Mr. M el Brook representing McDonalds felt exit on School
St is needed.
r.
3. Mr y attorney for Jack Robertson, dis-
cussed the easement on. School St. for the board.
4. Mr. Jack Robertson presented traff .c count data on School
District 23J parking lot adjacent to the site and pedes-
trian counts crossing the site.
•
C. Opposing Testimony:
1. Mrs. Eleanor Quimby cited danger to school children
brought up the pedestrian activated Signal. i(
2. Mr. ' Klu7 ke, chairman Tigard �'� #3 s.a i
d the NPO is con-
cerned
about traffic problems on School St. and on Pacific /
Hwy.
3. opposing the project in the record
}
petitions ro ect Were entered
(attached)
4. Letter from Tigard Public Schools read into rei.ord
(attached) .
D�.
)3(2)ard 1Discussion and Action 4
. I
.: . r..r. ... w....l+I.... n ..,...,., nrn.e.,.....,W n.. am.• ..Jl,.r{.4...i.0»wJ Mn..rA...,.-. i 4,,,r..,::w a.a..+..nlf+ar;a4 ,
I y
q.
•
a ,
1. Cook/Edin discussed traffic roblem -- Cook suggested
that closing School St. exit and reversing: traffic flow
may be worse than applicant's plan.
' 2. McMonagle said cross traffic at service station entrance
and McDonalds exit is only one problem -- conflict between
deceleration lane in front of school, the entrance/exit
at School St.and McDonads northerly access as more
• critical.
3. Bartel summarized concerns he had over the pedestrian
activated signal, the joint access with the service
' station and McDonalds and the-status of School St.
4. Moved (MoMonagle) , seconded (Cook) to deny and request
that McDonalds redesign their site plan with entrance f6
and Parallel_,. '
• to south boun.darY; shifting driveway from
Standard station property line in order to establish
. separation of access drives and the only exit to be o,
on to School Street closing the northerly access drive
entirely.
5. Notion to amend (Edin) to have power pole moved, widen
School Street and leave fencing as shown. Died for
' lack of second.
6. Original motion (McMonagle) passed unanimously. ,
4.2 Tigard Industrial Park (SDR 3-75)
A request for site design
and architectural review eview of a propoJed
light in dustrial building in an industrial park located at 99 20
SW Tigard St,
A. Staff Report (see attached)
B. Applicant's Presentation Bob Cray, applicant, presented
proposal.
C.
Board Discussion and Action
1. Board discussed access through site and whether
there
is need for updated site plan/landscape ,plan.
2, Staff was asked to clarif y boundaries of approval area
• and if the rear landscaping and parking was `included.
staff's inderstandin g wa5
that there would be a final j
phase hut that the parking lot was to be constructed in.
this phase
3. Motion (Cook) , seconded (Bartel) to accept site plan per
staff recommended conditions #1, 2'h 3 4 &6.
1). Architectural Review
SIDR Mi nutes -: 2/20/75 -4 page 2
r
" t w...rvdo..,•t....—.6.,.,.,..i.w,i wr linu,r,tR
:..vs::....+max....-.... w.».•- '..wrm»rw,.u:;...w..»_, .,..::er«..w ...;e+"..>...,wi.w»:+.>•..y,.qq.
1. Applicant's Presentation:
Mr, Bob Gray said that the building', plans submitted were
in error and that the elevations would appear the same
as Tigard IV, the building immediately north east of
the proposed Tigard ICI.
2. Board Discussion and Action:
Moved (Cook)) seconded (Bartel) to accept building as
,
altered by applicant.
5. OTHER BUSINESS
rr
5.1 Charlotte Olson brought in revised site plans and elevations ale
for x Setnik er Project to confer with board. Board ooncensus was
� p ro
that red'es:. gn is much better than that submitted -- gas pump
location needs attention, existing landscaping needs to be shown
parking may be still insufficient.
• and ar
Mrs. Olson said she would not be doing building design, but
would furnish design criteria and proposed elevations to
architect selected by Mr. Setniker.
6 ADJOURNMENT: 8:00 p.m.
•
Sph M notes - 2/20/75 page 3
•
f
i
i
1 ,
i
SITE
DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW BO R D
�
.
Staff
Report '1
February u ar y 20 1975
�
Item G'.
e
Agenda en da I
SDR 3-7, (R. A. Gray & Co. ) fy ,
•
RSite Development Plan Review
iew
for site located at 9920 SW Tigard Street, within the Tigard
Industrial Park and zoned M-4 (NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Sec. t
2 T2S, R1W •W. M. ) f'
Staff Findings
1. This project has been previously considered in the following
cases
(approved in April, 1974)
Site Design R eview 6-74 (a pp
Conditional •
nal Use 5-72 (approved in March, April, 1974).
Ordinance 72-31 (passed in April, 1972
Variance 2-72 (approved in March, 1972.
2.
TWO different previously-approved site plans for the overall
_ g variously one y sub-
mitted ry s the project with P � � from th
�.o ect develo merit differn varou
�.. mitted with this proposal in building size ,ions,
sizes and locations;
parking lot dimensions, number of "head-in1° parking lot
stalls and landscaped
areas are on file "
with the City of Tigard. A licant has now submitted an
ndaislew�.d widths
y g Pp
P
amended site plan to suercede previously-submitted' lans.
P p
3. A dedicated street (County Rd. 893) traverses the site from
east to west more or less through the center of the site.
Planting areas and parking stalls are presently installed
in the street right-of- way. Staff Understands that appli
cant has commenced vacation proceedings for the portions
of the county road traversing his site
, r 4. Access drives within the presently proposed "Tigard III"
,; ri/ - area providing access to the rear of the site are in.ad..
equate for truck. maneuvering.
5. Plantings required " z not provided
q parking
O (fin S as'�/((r''�e u�red in. arkiz areas are no
18.58.060. ..TMC:
( TMC) .
g ' s diminutive in scale
rjr 55 6. Present an�. proposed „ andscapin �., e
• ,; y.,�,r,r 4, and ought to be supplemented with large hard ; native S.
g y been left
trees to the rear i be
Fill areas not been l�.n,ds�ca e��ashrequired by unprotected and have n p
Tigard code.
7. Sight screening required between industrial zone and ���esi-
1 detial zoned areas is not presently adequate.
/ye e r
» ,... ....,...a� _...,.:_...a .,.»..;,,.+:; a_._,.....f..u...,,..::,.....w.,........;W:1..._...,,...:;.rJ..A...,a-.M,«,...ar..,.u_...a».r.».iw.:u.a.u...s.,.»m....a.t_......I,.w....,»..4._. .�+i...cw^w..,...s S„
•
' V f�-e tt�) (we.-'�4--e4/r%,'1J'' ,„S /4,5' 7 ( /dc,c�C. r
8. Luminaire placement on existing buildings is poor.
9. Site inspection showed differences between approved: draw-
g and present (existing) site developments .
. . , ings pr .
a. front yard required landscaping (20 ft. ) appears to
be 10 ft. 1 aS buia.t fZ. AI pAY,
b. required side yard landscaping and sight obscurin
g , .w.►C
fence hedge ,�
0
enc e r e
g has not been nstalled,�,�a.�i /,�� /r'd. �-l�r
o. Front parking area appears to diffe in location and
configuration from approved 'r� ,tr` 'Y'-'��/rl:... . c ��,� �a�, f,�
/
d Planting area at north end o'f ►r Ti and III appears�
be reduced in size! f .,.
from a -
. rove
pip d" - a
IrI
('--- ____Staff Recommendation
The staff recommends that the Board approve this request as` • +
submitted on conditions that:
] 1. Plans a'1,c uratew l Y. depicting present development,
to in--
clude' location and sizes of parking spaces, curbs, walk- '
• ways, luminaires, lot lines, vegetation, buildings, i
utilities, drains, service areas, loading areas and sprink-- 1
ler system. i
• 2. Vacation of Co Rd. 893 is accomplished before building d�a
w
��6���� permit may be granted. � ,
o 3. conditions of CU 5- 72 and V 2- 2 as 'confirmed
7 �.n Tigard
'9%)'"116( ''' ordinance 72-31 are net
4. Provisions of Chapter 18.52 -
p 52
( vial Pa
with respect to permitted uses are met by.either abatement
of proscribed uses or by application for conditional use
where the use is conditionally acceptable.
\:'' ,� çEher proposed sea building Tigard III,, a Sshoetened
10-15
0 feet or c urb-cropped back to pro vide minimum access to rear ear
,sand provide adequate sight clearance` ,around building corner,
6. Developer submit landscape plan for whole development and
work toward. its implementation.
SDR Staff Report - January 16i 1975 -- page 2 d
,
7D I
. R. A. GRAY Cu 5-72
Condition, per a roval
.: of conditional use:. c pp
1. that the front 10 feet of the subject property be dedi6ated
. to the City for the future widening and 'improveY,ient of S. W.
Tigard Street,
. 2. The front Yard of the subject property shall be landscaped
• and maintained within the side yards. p
-« 3. A dense strip of evergreen trees shall be planted and main alne
d
within the side yards.
4, A detailed screening and landscaping plan showing the location
[varieties and sizes of trees and plant materials shall be
approved by the City staff. Said landscaping shall be installed
prior to occupancyA
that an easement of 50 f
" - o:�a. the north side of the creek be
�• feet
dedicated to the public
Conditions per approval of variance:
. ., 1. The building sh all b e no higher than one story or 25 feet,
whichever is less.
/2. that the front 10 feet of the
subject property p er
� be dedicated
to the City fcr the future widening and improvement of S. W.
Tigard Street.
3• The front Yard of the subject
Property shall be landscaped and
maintained.
4. dense trees shall be Planted and maintained
. A den,�e strip of evergreen t p ,
within the side yards.
and landscaping scre 'n plan showing the locationp
5. A detailed enin a
° p g p /
plant .� a '
varieties and sizeS of trees
materials
s a ees a.nd. _ant ,shall `be
. approved y the City staff. Said. landscaping shall be installed
prior to occupancy.
6. that the Planning Commission review an.d approve the final site
development plan..
•
Jed
2/20/7
, F
t J
f
r ,
r
SITE DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW BOARD E
Staff Report ` . 1'
January 16, 197 5 i
Agenda Item 4.1
SDR 3-75 ( R. A. Gray & Co. )
Site Dwelopment Plan Review
for site located at 9920 S. W. Tigard St. ,' within the Tigard
Industrial Pare-and zoned M-4 (NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Sec.
2, T2S, R1W, W. M. )
,
Staff Findings
in This project has been considered previously as:
site Design Review 6-74 (approved in April, 1974)
Conditional Use - 2 (approved in March, 1972; Aril 1974' . ``
. C nd�. 5 7 ( Ph � � April, � �'
Ordinance 72-31 (passed in April, 1972
Variance 2-72 (approved in March, 1972
for the overall
2. Two different previously--approved Site plena for �
project development -- differing variously from the one j
submitted with this proposal in building sizes and 'lo--
' cations parking lot dimensions, number of "head_in" park-'
ing to t Stalls and aisle widths and landscaped ar
eas are
on file with the City of Tigard. r
: . A dedicated street (Co. Rd. 893) traverses
the site`
fx Om
w,F
east to west more or less through the center of the site
stalls Presently installed '
Planting areas and parking ste.l_s are. p Y
g Y
in the street right-of-way.
.
' 4. The buildin g proposed as "Tigard III" is possibly partly
in
the right-of-way of Co. Rd. 893.
5. The sideyard setback established by variance for "Tigard •
TV" project does not apply to presently proposed "Tigard
III" . Tigard III is shown 20 ' from a side lot line abutting
an R-7 zone where a 50 ' side yard setback is required 3 `
(18:52,020 TMC) . .
6. Access drives within the presently proposed "Tigard III p
area providing' access to the rear of the site are inadequate ' {
for truck maneuvering
7. Plantings as required in parking areas are not Provided '1
(18 58.060 TMG) .
8: Present and proposed landscaping is diminutive in scale i'
and ought to be supplemented with large hardy$ native
trees, 1 $
is
1 'L,
d' 1 ltl
1
ar f
r
r 1
..:i:: ..,r._. r. .... r s: r.-'I ...... .J.,+.rx«.`.::J...w.. .:. _.. ,.1 1 ......r...-,J .!•.. .4r. x.Jl..-. ,:.l r•.•,Dr...—w,rt-..
•
4
• •9. Site inspection showed differ
ences between a
ro ved
drawings and p resent (existing) site de velopme nt. •a front y ar
d
required landsca in g (20 ft. ) a pp ears to
be 10 ft. ± as built M
b. required side yard landscaping and sight obscuring
fence or hedge has not been installed
c. A portion of the agreed to parking area is presently
used for storage of building materials and has not been
striped.
d. Front parking area appears to differ in location and
configuration from approved.
P Planting area at north end of "Tigard III" appears to
be reduced in size fr m approved.
10. Several violations of Tigard Municipal Code Chapter 18.52.010 "
and 18.52.020 (permitted uses in the Industrial Park zone)
were noted by staff on site inspection:
a. retail sales conducted in building known as 'Tigard 1"
b. outside storage of heavy equipment
c. outside storage of building materials
td. gymnastic center in building known as "Tigard IVY"
e. contractors offices ,
e ,
Staff Recommendation
The staff recommends that the board deny this request as sub-
mitted. The staff further recommends that the board could
consider tabling until such time as:
I) Plans accurately depicting present development, to include
location and sizes of parking spaces, curbs, walkways,
Y luminaires, lot lines, vegtation, buildings, utilities,
drains, service areas, loading areas and sprinkler system.
2) vacates of Co. Rd. 893 is accomplished 2.
3) conditions of CU5-72 (and ordinance 72-31) are met or
changed
µ
4) provisions of Chapter 18.52, TMC, (Industrial Park Zone)
with respect to permitted uses are met by either abatement
of proscribed uses or by application for conditional use
where the use is o9nc.itionally acceptable
SDR Staff Report - January l60 1975 page 2 -
. • ., . .. . •., . ....... r...r,r. ,.r r,r r D . ... ......... . ... _. .. r.. .,.•. .., r, , ,r r., a r.,,.,r, .r.„r ,
ar
9
l ,„
. u-4.L I Y x.,,. u+....r.r,y.:k 1.4✓lNrx..••,.�.w-d.....,:,L a..11.i.,Je.a e✓':° _ .u_,ur+.-w+:.v:..N+, '
*' A
LICENSE OR PERMIT BOND THE aTNla CASUALTY AND SURETY TY CoM1PAN
d •
,
'4 I Hartford, Connecticut 06115
LIFE&CASUALTY 1
' • ' ' NO 42 SB 10996 BOA `
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: ' , ' ,.
• , That we, R. A,, Gray &; Co.
as Principal, and THE kTNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, a corporation organized under the laws of the
. State of Connecticut with its principei office in the City of Hartford, Connecticut, as Surety, are held and firmly '
• bound unto City of Tigard, Oregon as Obligee, in the
full pen& sum of Two Thousand and no/100 .. . ,. .YYd.Y. , .,.......,.,, —..,Yb..+—. .., ($2,000.* ) :
•' • 'h Dollars, lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which, well and truly to be made, we bind our-
selves, our heirs, executors; administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. r
WHEREAS, the above bounden Principal has obtained or is about to obtain from the said Obligee a license or permit
•
• for occupancy', of Phase II of Tigard Iudualrxai a1 Paric
•
; and the term of said license or permit is as indicated opposite the
• block checked below: ,
U Beginning the day of 19 , and ending the day of 19 •
1;3: Continuous, beginning the 27 day of June 19 73 '
•
WHEREAS, the Principal is required by law to file with City of Tigard a bond gr, aiantee�.ng
a.11,.:1. landscaping will b. com e ed within 6 me 1,hs of,000uraanc.3r per plans submitted
to Tigard Planning Co .a scion by principal.
ii..4, ►+r,M 0.$?4,6►CFI,•,,.: 41'1E10 /A::(E,i;Uq.Ib,k ii 4 41..•11.,a/M''M'•{,p?
NOW THEREFORE,THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH,that if the above bounded Principal as such liven-
.
' 1
. ■
• , see or permitee shal indemnify said Obligee a g o ast a oss, costs, ex ea sesa r damage e to i caused said sc
"
, opal's non-compliance with or breach of a ny laws, statutes ordinances, rules or regulations pertaining to such
license or permit issued to the Principal, which said breach or non-compliance shall occur during the term of this
bond, then this obligation shall be void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. •.•
PRO ED, that if this bond is for fixed `erm, it may be continued by Certificate executed by the 1, '
VID Y y y Sr,rety hereon; �,
and
PROVIDED FURTHER, that regardless of the number of years this bard shall continue or be continued In force and of ,
the number of premiums that shall be payable or paid, the Surety shall not be liable hereunder for a larger,amibttnt,11 ,°
in the aggregate, than the amount of this bond, and „w,- i''y f';'`);i tp,;,, i ..L..,/'
t
' i.� , the .. ,. ...,. ., "� u � • .r �: �.. I
PROVIDED FURTHER, that if the Surety shall so elect, this bond may be cancelled by the Surety aYs to°isf bs ,scent" ',V. PW ,
'liability by giving thirty (30) days notice in writing to said Obligee, {w'". "',, : „' ,.rn'.�w.. u
! .
," SIGNED SEALED AND DATED this 19. 3 ti; r,...1'..',4,,,',',,,1`, )..�,,,,,
. 7h day of 7 i t
! ''..4.,,,,11.. a N NSW.
� \�(J' �{/'� '{y! aM nx ;G � ,k$,,,.'� l•'
• .+ ,4 "A.. r- .Ai A 4 w k'f 1,,t. t',
»a
r+",', ���w rye
THE IaTNA CASUALTY COMPANY
� x,a
r1
vi....., n.a White ''?^At'torin'eitz'i ti.Pactrµ',`a ,' I�
q Mup
•
�
t.:.1 N n" a
!Yr�Y¢= " k !
i C S• 1 U31 Fry 2.1,1 [ al�r� �h!�u,s.A
. �...... , . . ...,, ..,. .,,. .,.. . :, „..,... ._.. . . ..... ...„ . ..,.,,y r.. ....., .. ,,.,.., I a.':.•--fit
•'ter
. . . , .
.
• , : • , •
, .....i., ' ••
, .
' 1
I I
I I I ' 1 ■ ' .
I ,
I ' r 1 ■ •
,
• arr= ' , ' 'r ' ' ' ,THE/ETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY •
,
, . 0 • ' , : , , , • , ' ' • Hartford,Connecticut 06115
• POWER OF ATTORNEY,AND CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY OF ATTORNEY(S)-IN-FACT
1 •
, ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' • ' ''' ' ' •
, , , 1 • ,
, ,
,
, , , , „ • , , ,. ,
. •
. INOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS,THAT THE/ETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY,n corporation duly:organized under the laws of the '' , .•
,
I , ' S!-ate of Connecticut,,arid having its erIrieipal 4::4ffice in'the'Cityof Hertford, county of:Hartford>,State of Connecticut, hath made, constituted
.
.A, ,, , ,, and,appointed,and does by these presents make,constitute and appoint Virginia White -, .... , : , ' , ,'' •
• ,
• , . , , ,
:'.:. ' , of Portland, Oregon ' , its true and lawful AttorneyS-in-Fact,with full pewet and authority hereby conferred
- '': to sign,execute:and acknowledge, at any place within the Uni ted States,or, it the teetering Ilea be:filled in within the area there designated
. ,the following iestrument(s): , r ' ' I ' '1' .%
. ' • • by his sole signature and act, any and all bonds,recognizances, contracts of indemnity,and other teritings,obligatory in the nature of a bond,
, recognizance,or:cortditional undertaking, and any and all consents incident thereto not exceeding the sum of SEVENTY FIVE , ' " '.
, , , .
. THOUSAND ($75,000,00) DOLLARS - !, ,' ''N\
. ,
• . .,
, , and to bind THE/ETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY,thereby as fully and to the same extent es,if the game were stoned by the duly
,
• r authorized officers of THE/ETNA CASUALTY AND'SURETY.COMPANY,and all the acts of said Arturneye•in-Fact,pursuant'to:the authority hereto
: • ' , , Elwin,are hereby ratified and confirmed,
,A ' This appointrnentis made under end by authority of the following Standing Reseltittorts of said Company which Resolutions are now in full force •
and effect) : . .
„•
• ' ' ',' VOTED', That each of the following officers:Chairman,F'resident,Any Executive Vice President,Any Semler Vice President,Any Vice,President,, .
.
. ' ',, Any Assistant Vice President,Any Secretary,may from time to time appoint Resident Vice Presidents,Resident Assistant Secretaries,Attorneys-
in-Fact,and Atients to act for and on behalf of the'Compaity and may give env sueh,appointee such authority,aS his certificate of atithority,may
,
. ' ,. , prescribe to sign with the Cempany's name and r seal'with the Cortvany's ses1 bonds,recognizances,,contracts of indemnity, and other writings
obligatory in the nature of a bond,recognizance,or conditional undertaltine,and any of said officers or the Board of'Directors may at any time „
. ', remove any suet)appointee and revoke the power and authority given him,
VOTED: That any bond,recognizanee,contract of indemnity,or writing obligatory in the nature of a bond,,recognizance, or conditional under-
', , taking Shall be valid end binding upon the Company when la)sighed by the Chairman,the President or a Vice President or by a Resident Vice,'
President,pursuant to the power prescribed in the certificate of authority of suph Resident'Vice President,and duly attested and sealed with the '
A
Company's seal,by a Secretary(It Assistant Secretary or by a Resident Assistarit Secretary,pursuant te the power preseribed in the certificate
of authority of such Resident Assistant Secretary;or lb)duly executed teither seal, if required) by one or more Attorneys-itHFact purstaiet to
. : the power prescribed in his or their certificate or certificates of authority, ' , ' ' :: , • "
•
This Power of Attorney and Certificate of Authority is sighed end sealed by facsimile under and by authority of the following Strattline Reenjution
4(
voted by the hoard of Directors of THE/ETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY which Resolution is now in full force and effect:
• f .
VOTEDI Thal the signature of each of the following offiterst Chairman,'President,Any Executive Vice President,Arty Senior Vire Presidert t,
Arty Vice President,Any Assistant Vice President,Arty Secretary,and the seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile to any bower of attorney
or to any certificate relating thereto appointing Resident Vice Presidents,Resident Assistant Seeretaries or Attorneys,In.ract for purposes only ,
. ,
of executing and attesting bonds and undertakings and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof,and any such power of attorney or car-
tificete bearing such facsimile signature or facsimile seal shall be valid anti binding upon the Company arid any such power se executed and cep. •
titled by such facsimile signature and facsimile seal Shall be valid and binding upon the Company in the future With respect to arty bond or ,
undertaking to Which It is attached, . •
. I,. .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,THE',ETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY has caused this instrument to be signed by its
. , .
Secretary , and Its corporate seal to be hereto affixed this 30th day of January , '19 73 ".•'
THE ATRIA CASUALTY AND SURETY CoMPANY
' 6,4'•-.0$
■•. ' , By )---/
State of Connecticut ) Secretary
d Hartfor
se.
:-
, Cbunty of Hartford
. ,
,.,,,
On this 30th day of titlittiEtty , 10 73 ,before me personally came R« T4 RIPPE,
to me kli0Wfie who being by me duly sworn,did depose and say',that he is ' EteCtetary Of
THE,ATNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY,the corporation described in and whielt executed the above instrument; that he,,kneWs the seal
of said corperatierit that the seal affixed to the Said instrument is Stith cerperata Shall and that he executed the Said instriliTieht oilibehalf of the
• corporation by authority of his office under the Standing Resolutions thereof,
.:
,
' ' . •4 A„tVAN .7""&e.i.te A
. .(.._10 • • ,
+:. 4 if 1, .."14c2e .e.,„._____.;)
4 , •
14 ' Notary Public
. ,
..
Mr 4 natater4i 0 t( 'ii-Mal(11.11,1 19
CERTIFICATE
I,the uticiarsigned, Secretsty , at THE/ETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY,a stock corporation of
the State of Comedic:lit,DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing and attached,PoWer of Attorney and Cl)rtificate of Authority remelnerin,full force
and has net betirt revoked:and forthermore,that the Standing Resolutions of the hoard of Directors,as set forth in the Certificate of Authority,
• '
' A, are now 111 force.
'
• Slotted And Sealed at the Horne Office of the Company,in the City of Hartford State of'Connecticut.Dated this , '"Oh , ''' day of
19 3
,001
,. , , ,, 4.,''.,,,••,; BY 1, ' ' — ' ' ., ' ,•,‘
S.1,4,,,,c,imt I,.it , ,,,, ,, IN u.s,A.
„ : , : ' ' ' ' , ', :,' ' $ii,dtettil4y • ' .'),
C,_ . • . , P
, • ) . , , ,