SDR27-75 POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
t I j1., `
'� � /�y','+1rwy�yM.i}' � 1, �`f i
r °.p N. }X� 1 r'1 , GL DP,' ti✓ D.LP 0L�1 c Y ` Pr e,1 :e:;,'..-.tj ,3 ,
•�yA .,.....,rluI�A.n.4.�:%,..uJ" d t ��� I t
r'�M P • it IW7 1!t t C( I i; I. I I i
` �}Si e Deve1 t5prne nt 06�tL.ew (Sb 27-75)`'' `'
s � I� tG /�' SW I IA y� r i� r t ;l ll'
'1 ¢ +I ■■h'lti G1 0, S Y VAzib R .� j, I,,''
•I 1. .
II 1 y ¢a r" 4 1! r I�4 ,'� �1 tl `.
I !I t R
I. I '', 1 • t ,I,..,''ti t II' iltl �r,Zn''.';.A,'''.r 1 a 11 y'I ' 'D l: it 'a
•Y ,7
a
.■
r.
7
,
♦
•
r.
I ,
A
�b I ti
� I I
,
r
i
1
I
I
•
•
fi
� I
•
1 I
' I I
F f.
• •
I
i
K, ` d
•
' NC� In ,,.. ,.t r. ,� I�w m,rt v.0..,r xrt,r.c •. n ....,r .a•. , u r,r, .., , ...,., Nn.. ....v•w,. :.. , • _
t e
�•
may. \. • r •1 tee. • , .. ♦ . •�......Mm-•la ' 1•
•o
• 4
•
- . September 16, 1975
I
r, Hawes o S '.
. Clair* Nl 9 Cook o `
`, S. W, 6
, portiando con
't' er3c:' o' a mr. Cook ,
' I
q ereto ' Pile No a . 27-75 ( "ar ers Credit Lirion)
`v I
Please be advised that the Tigard Sito Development and Az c t ar �
ya , € R . � w � 19750
e ., * reviewed
I, our site . a :e ra a si aro, M1 s o
was
. , approved as presented*
•
It you io a or need additional intormation, . eases
do not hositato to oa 1 this o ioe t 6 4 7
' ' op T4G
Jerald M. Powt11, Asoot. AI?
o , Platt:for
1 ampzpt
oat Formers Insuranoe tInion
-r�
4
• I, I
I :
1
' y ...»...� ,yet t•"..• I 1
I w,.✓,.I(=,....,1,_..L-.�,..,.I..Lfw-rc.L.:L,i.,k...»«...,..,.Y,f....�.,.xw..,�M'.:.,,.I,...n.�,«a`..'.;w+.w,.a,...5.::+iw,,.-..1-.r,;-„a;A.l,.c..,.,...e..,,.�._::ai.._.,..J,x. �f
AGENDA 5'1))( P 2 1) 5
ND�i
, TIGARD SITE DEVELopm NT PLAN
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
.,
.' SEPTEMBER 9, 1975, 5:00 P.M.
TWALITy JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL
14650 S.W. 97TH AVENUE
TIGARD, OREGON ,
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. MINUTES OF AUGUST 26, 1975
K
jl‘ 4. CCrlivIUN1CATIONS
5. PROJECT REVIEWS
' 5.2. SDR 27-75 (F'armer's Credit Union/Hawes, St, Clair, Miller & Cook)
A request fo r revie w of a Proposed 6000 s quare foot office ,
,.
building at S.W. 67th Avenue and Hampton Street. -
" a A. Site Development Plan ,
I
I
1. Staff Report
• . : 2. Applicant Presentation
3, Board Discussion & Action
B. Architectural Design Review :
1. Applicant Presentation
2. Board Discussion & Action
,
,
5.2 ' SDR 28-7
5
(Tigard Times) ,
.
A ues'q for review of a proposed office remodeling at ,
A re quest
S.W. Main Street & S.W. Burnham Street. ,
A. Site Development Play, I
1. Staff Rport
2. Applicant Presentation PP
3. Board Discussion & Action
Architectur "g
B 1. A Applicant Pr�es�;.ntation
P Presentation
I I
2. Board Discussion & Action •
, 6. OTHER ]BUSINESS , %
,
,
. I
. 6.1 Preliminary proposal for or a shopping r�center
at
'" "* Main Street
and S.W. Scoffa.ris Street. Review a ,d Comment
,
7• ADJOURNMENT
I I
�r II
{{II
AA
I i,
l,.
f.. I
4.,a ,r„'_,r 1,,.r ..•.,....-...rn..«:...rr. +.r n:..r4 r.._.r..'..'.ln w. .....ri:. r..+.rti. r r.r for...,r.pA,rlrLMr r..,.._A
' n�, ' Ja l w •,n . .rta ,m.l r «.A..iki».r N+. n.tc,o„f.« ....«_ r. x +. r
. I
,°,`
r ,
MINUTES
r
n.
r • ,
Tigard Site Development & Architectural Design Review Board
'`', September 9, 1975
General Telep hone Building,i n g, Mai,,n
St. , Tigard, Oregon
1. CALL TO ORDER: 5:20 p.m.
I 2. ROLL CALL,: Present: Cook, Kelting, Hammes, McMonagle, 'Wakem
Olson arrived at 6:10 p.m.
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes of August 26, 1975, were a pp roved
A as read.
,- COMMUNICATIONS: N on
e , .
`M a 5. PROJECT REVIEWS
(Due to lack of quorum as yet for item 5.1, Farmers Credit ' ,...7,
Union? staff requested that item 5.2, Tigard` Times, be taken
'' f
f t r.2 SDR 28-75 (Tigard 75 (T Times)
A request for review of a proposed office remodeling at
SW Main St. and Burnham St. (former Post Office bldg. ) .
r ,
A. Site Development Plan Reyiew
1. Staff Report: read by Powell. Slides were shown.
,.-f}J.
p;p-- Presentation: Shafer� of the Tigard
2. Applicant Presentation. Joe Sh
Times was present to answer questions.
3. Staff Recommendation: Approval as' drawn with screen
s planting provided `;in the space adjacent the loading
dock and diagonal parking channels in the rear of
/: the building.
j 4, Board Discussion and Action
o The Board discussed 'the proposal, requested review
° ` of the slides and then agreed to adjourn briefly
to inspect the site as it was 50 ft. away.
o Following inspection of the site, a brief dis -
cussion of the curb and sidewalk in front ''ensued.
o Moved to adopt per Staff recommendations (Kelting) .
6 ,` Seconded (Hammes)..
r o Motion to amend Kel`ting motion (Cook) to include
conditions of applicant s restoring' the former
curb cut in front of building to a standard
.. g
( r
N I }
• t
. :• . .:.• ., r.:., .. ,, r r.r.. rwr,r .w r » ..r, . ,r r. r o r r . ,
1 C >' ' y I
f -:y;,, ..... ,. _._. .,J .... ...xn .,w+ .:l:.- .i fc. .c..., ,•.,..+,'x;..ub-... .•t... ,.o,».... _t,.,e.,., ..Jn,.t.,., r
' ,.Nr IC aF..-... .R.z..V.;,I+.Y'"ry4.'»NtfCKtY.i•C,
sidewalk and curb and that he fill the narrow r
curb out adjacent the entrance on the turnham, St. ',
side. r
0 Motion to amend seconded (Wakem) .
o Motion carried 4-1, Kelting against.
o Motion to approve with, amendment carried unani-
`1 mousl.y, !
B. Architectural Design �.ev
i ew I
I.,
l
Applicant icarit� Presentation:
Charlotte Olson, designer
of the remodeling, described the proposed remodeling C
for the Board.
•
2. Board Discussion and Action
o Motion to approve (Cook) .
o Seconded (Kelting) .
o Motion approved (unanimously)
5.1 SDR. 27_75 (Farmers Credit Union/Hawes, St. Clair, Mill
Cook and Tollen)
A r r
:
euestforrevie of I
ro 0
�e
� d: 6004 s ft. office �.
P p
�.ce
building at SW 67th Avenue q II I
v e and, Ham
' g 7 Hampton St.
b
M
o Due to their involvement in the project, members Cook iFf
and Wakem excused themselves from discussion and in i
dicated. they would abstain frog. . participation in this ��
review.
A. Site Development Plan Review
1. staff Report: Y Read b. Powell.
I t
2. Applicant Presentations Mr. Cook, representing the
architects, escribe chart changes that the y
had mad e in
response to staff's recommendation and discussed the
site plan and landscape design.'
3. Staff Recommendation: Not presented.
4 Commission Discussion and Action
,:• o Moved H es� .�P for ap, roval.
•
( amm . ,
o eon d
c
on
S d (Olson) .
s
(unanimously,
o Carried ( )
•
DRB Minutes - 9/9/75 ,- page
,
tk'
B. Architectural Design R
e
..View
1. Applicant Presentation.: Mr." Cook showed the
Board a model of the building and described a
h
colors and materials to be used.
2, Board Discussion and Action
o
Moved (Kelting) for approval
o Seconded (Hammes) .
o Motion. carried (unanimously) .
6. OTHER BUSINESS
� ARY PROPOSAL. SHOPPING CENTER AT SW MAIN ST.
6.
FOR A SHOP
6.1 PRELIMINARY N
AND SW SCOFFINS ST.'
i o Staff introduced the topic and provided the Board with ,
background information and the" reasons for staff's
bringing this review before them at this time.
o Dick w- , .
ck Ehman, architect representing Payless (the appli�
cant) , presented his proposed site plan and described
the criteria and standards that he had used in develop_
ment. ,of this plan.
.. r
o Hank Hummel, representing the applicant, described Pay-
less' concerns with site design and discussed the
applicants concern with their acceptability to the ,
Boards and Commissions of the City of Tigard.
o Design Review Board discussed the proposal_, questioning
Mr. Ehman on design points involved in his proposed
Plan.
o Co shown with respect Concern was
p t to the '�street'� through
tl' the-Project and the impact that use of that street'
project would have o p c, - sel4
; the i� f'
o Olson and McMonagle questioned the apps' ' n,t concerning
alternative layout concepts, particularly ones that
would, avoid a direct front axposure of the buildings to
main St
o Mr. Ehman explained that he had tried the diagonal ,
x orientation, but both grades and excessive distance to
parking spots had ruled it out.
o Cook expressed concern with the placement of the 'wide
expanse of parking between the building""and the street
and asked if the number of parking Spaces was allright
with D.: =Q.
o NMoMonagle asked if it would be possible to place the
DRB Minutes w page 3
w)
L ,
I L.
.1..,-r .,.. l.«t....1.,::1,1,1, .,..,1..+5i„�-.rib..t•.Ma,: r ....I.......+-.,nx.Nl..,«.6s''lrrw a a ia.,..F.,.neia l....:A:s,.t..a....Y;:d4;+:,.w..«,.S4,i..;:Zit,1.u....v,n..ri....,.NJ;.,i:A.:.�'Ln,e,auu..,..,.."..uui,...::>wu.ur.-..+x».w:,...raw.,.u.J"t.,-r llvµ4n:.vawwn,utM:'.a i
1� yrr_
i
buildings apart, more or less diagonally on the site,
with access to Samba 's and Hall run between the to
buildings. ;
` o Wakem said he felt landscaping would possibly be a ;) ''
critical: dimension in site development.
. I
0 Mr. Ebman explained they had tried several alternative
1
Layouts and the one presented was the only one that , '
would fit their site development criteria.
• I o Cook
expressed his concern that the sole criteria he
r saw evidenced appeared to be the use of the parking lot `
' and maximizing its effectiveness.
o McMonagle expressed an opinion that diagonal orientation
of the hldgs an the site he felt to be preferable and ;;;,
that adequate grading of the site to eliminate excessive .'
grades would be inexpensive and well worth the effort,.
"' o McMonagle also asked if the applicant would consider
developing more fully his alternative in that con-
I I
figuration. . \,
o Cook said he felt lt that a more innovative ovative approach must
be used fo r thi s site and he felt more thought should l '
�.
be given to the proposal. ) k
o There being no further business, the chairman asked
f o r ''ad ournment. ,
}
' 7. ADJOURNMENT: 8:10 P.m.
,
S I
l
•
' N
Mt
: ORB Minutes 9/9/75 page 4
t
II ,
Elk ,.
, ...x rn.i. 'ix. ,.. rc.. ,. .. a ,W.. .,a u.... m. .........,
Elk V n ! , 4" ,ti •.
tY . I f • .
.
1
////B . ...:.... ....a..:.... ......... ,...., w. JJ I.. •. A.w .... ..t.,.,..•...WU{a•..,.w. .J
5 (_,2-- 2 c
STAFF REPORT
TI GARS SITE DEVELOPMENT PLA
N &
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ,.II
SEPTEMBER 9, 1975.
PROJECT REVIEW
. BDR 27-75 (Farmers Credit Union/Hawes, St. Clair, Miller & Cook)
•
�A p ro p osed 6,Ofl4 s q uare f oot commercial building on a 1/2 acre site ,
at S.W. 67th Avenue and Hampton Street.
Staff F1n.di1ags
+ . 1. Present use of 'the site is for single family residential; zoning
y is Commercial.--Professional (c_ID).
2. S.W. Hampton Street is presently a center strip street, the
applicant has been required to provide curbs, sidewalks and a
"half-street improvement" matching existing and enter stripe
as a condition of a previous planning commission action.
• 3. S.W. 67th Avenue is presently a gravel street, and applicant
with street
surface to match existing, Curbs and sidewalks tin the need only has been required to
gs sidewalk y extend as
• far north as the north side,. of applicant's driveway on that street. ��
4. A"non-remonstrance" agreement has been agreed to by applicant
for future street improvements.
5. In staff's opinion, the submitted drawings are adequate for
purposes of evaluation. a
' 6. Parkin g p rovided' on the site plan is adequate, but back out ,
sp, c e
shown on v lan is not. Realignment of the Easterly parking
141 channels to provide angled parking would result in the loss of
A at least One parking stall, however it would permit b titer:use
of the parking area and fewer s automobile.
p g quari� feet of�' alpha�t per�
The eighteen parking spaces remaining , r ',igard parking
i hteen. arkn s aces remainin woutld 'meet
requirements up to an occupant (full time equivalent employee only)
.. , loan of 8 persons. Staff feels this is more' than adequate. '
7. Acc i ess drive to .drive-up window is too narrow and the radii
(orimarily just the southerly one) in that drive are too
tight for some vehicles to negotiate without backing.
, 8. Staff is concerned about access to the site being from Hampton,
as it is possible p Hampton may not be closed (making it an
that Ham to
, obvioUs "short cut" from 66th to the 72nd/teaverton_Tigaro
E xp ressw ay interchange) the
of Very high rush
hour traffic volumes p recluding turnover 'overments to the drive.
9. The "s�•�ale" proposed between the sidewalk landscape area,� c�ewalk and lands e a doe s
not seem desirable from several, perspectives. First, it is an
inadequate and awkward solution to storm drainage (if it is
.xade �.zate a
is intended p. Secondly, the sidewalk
i � �
to serve that Purpose) . Seca,._
Y
should probably be adjacent the property line allowing space for
street trees along Hampton and 67th, And thirdly, a "swale"
in such. inevitably nevitably tecomes a maintenance problem ri
p
catching debris as well as drainage, and harboring pests of all .ii .
a
sorts, animal and vegetable. 1,
.
.
I r
1 "
• , d
r i
.. Y.i.:r:.f�'' ,.a. rl... ,...t,., t..r!•...,...ia,..6......,.,L,;._Jr�..r...r,x...:.1..,. ..,1J L;i.u,.,.t..,,LLdl:wiMr..4arnr..:�c
. I,.a,..,... �, rn...t,....1..G,W...4.... ...l.Y++..,.«J......'....,c+a,.b;Wa.-A�,nn,.t...rM.,.x.n..7.:«,c.1a.�1.....w,4..1.u�.4.a..w.s»;.1,...rN.« «G.r�...r.aJ...i,..-..w.r..- .u�+f;7:...wrw •.�.......4 4 a. .
STAR 27-7
Page 2
September 9, 1975
10. While staff seldom comments on choice of plant material. from
an aesthetic standpoint - there seem to be rather a large
number of different plant materials used; especially when
" juxtaposed with a building of modest proportions and simple
.* 4 surface treatments.
•
Staff Recommei•datians
r r r To be advised after,rciose of public hearing.
•
itr I
•
•
•
r , w
r •
,
•
•
•
� III
1 ,
I I
r I
1 r
. .
Il
•
,
awX- .M••f .M:t,..1,, Mw. ,. wx.b .f.v,. a'
..>M,r:.w.ur..w-._..-,amiex..xri,,,.AS:.ut„wu.a,.�sr.>1Jf.aMuar„:.a4,-;...z.,,,.rP1l..,^.,,zl fnuAa.urf,�Nr.,+l..of:akrwxr,....,'„ur-w�,...r¢.e-.f,;,.t,wnwai:lr^��.=�,'Y�r.u..,,•.--,7.T".a~tamm�```�q'„'Ij.'
SITE D VELlrPMENT PLAN "IMO I'(`;'r'! nr:q r',,J
r '
,. Q Site r)1
D nrlam'hi tc•c•ti"'1.1ra i7 Fr1rI k':?Li
1dPP �r.r� Iur'rl�ar� t. . �, p �-- '
rr
.Mart.wM1W„r„nbwlannv„r,r,wwwW.wW4Y,•r 1 iA'Wlf4.71.........1.1)7f 1 1r 4.
• ,
iM! Ur.`4 0.,i'YMJ,IWkY' nYlmrr'I"w^a'+Y'XJN M:'N+U,wwww,l*,W„
' �,
. q �It .Y i.1„YN...,y IRY...l i
... T y Y1 .( . NG 'COMMISSION 639-11).' 71 i a r l r? 1
,
•
• .«.u..w.,.n,...,wnl .u�..w
12420 S.I.Q. II.aa n S.i-,,r'6e ,T i gar do O'.e c 9'722"?1. B y
.1,.1tK�MU.arLLw+y,f,en,MMn..,Nw,..f,u,ewUr,M,..wW ..,,rw ww.,v+.rasM�nr.sw«..M,
f I. I .Y,...w� ..u....„.'. w....... .,....,.iw.r,z4-_,..- ur...w.,. «r....•+----.---,.+w..r„ ,........
"rte................,.•.,-r..--,4 -,.r...,»,«...,,..., .....
P�9z►TC.*"0 F4 61cg4
/ 5 I) ” s74w 4— _ •,
Y Project Title' ta,Y �, ,b'�' ' d1 J6�o tlit. ' Date ',r!r r'I ,�' - a
. .,.........,..rl,r,„,..,......_ .,.rw.o.,_. luwsl,eamllr;.,,..../M,nMmgM.w.r+f+...,_ ..
,,, .
. . ' ' w / .X... . �..X...t1. Y .Y...14' /r!G0 ,
•
WNf �� ' ' � � ` _
,.
,
,
f
Addr 1a3 ,� ,.$►W ;..r4�rx'11)C'3n,r ' • ► ,
• wir...... yrJl.r.....wux.........„...'r.i.,f, .....'.....N......YWwl,w,,„, JMNkn.w
a1..IwW.}..0 �' Y.a.A.r,'J.sY'ry.... r+MflrW.,.t »:I:hiN.!Ia1W1+wItlMrw,Mv+WAl.1.,ulJ.w..r►a
I��
/..rh.G,.wWrW.F� YWv ..,aMr.w 1N V ,.,Tr+g+ry ..FNWYtlLLgµ.9,.��/� .11 II:'. .. ... ..
�� .' .�1.i..1.gX•1w1.',F�dIWMl.01...."!I
M
1l(P' '� .,' fD�r'"""''' I'11,, I n,. r,I P r, ,. y°, a I
NY,t ., 11:WI.wY1t:,MHNIMUw,Wl:W1f,MNN1,YJ>fJl.XwM+CfINfH1:1NMFYyNM1 ,1f,e
�''�y+ ` -{ ,Try V,{��,T.t///" •••YYG���.../l///� � y �”
f°r(.r1 r r;,i w,. ✓d I,ti i.,''... 1 6./{I'��.�/�,,,,. ,,,t W '� `� e,,: I. .'k e..r N g F'—I d� ^' .,t' ''f�:A�,1 i�::, r Y'1.°% .
• r..(14..:10.,..,Iwn,.ur•/ ...1.n...,,:.• r .i....q.M....,.;..W..YY.I...t
X41,t•Lt►�IurgN„��Iw.M'.�rMM�Mr,MB..„AMU++,MM1CNI+MMMNIFY.:"iMMiW4l WIwV MYl,:rSi'i:IMM,;W, .MN1fL.(a1�1MbY,e.F.'M.Y:I IJIIK ••'1�M4WMk'�Wdfitf4Y1'IMIIldNWW +YIY,1'.rJ �1GI iA':.u:.M.f_kl,lillilUil4'.:-<.FraMlKrgIN.A Anwr�.+
1 rqr..
raw A....N.......W. _..i,Ny.I..... ..1W. ',I rdx:u........ww.ctiwty.....................u.uaYaaa,r,�... '.s:....w l�/Ir g4 a......1+4../wutN.wr....14,u.rUm w+.M1...........lgf.wwhun.+..1...MFwkwAkw..w ' '.
. w .:
Ile 1,...,....41: �.i wa.I,.+6�1 i1l!G Nettewt.....a'ett,.
qMl...r..+.uY•.m::ccaa.,. s.,w,..xr,q.,,n....F. ............V.r}ww'.::au'uy:'nwuwW,w r.....................',....11,....1.4/4'
.Hx.Y..Nravw,saam.�r,:rgww,...1...',w•:r.,.ol,i+aw unsw++uhaMrn,awtrw.N,M.sw.xw:wrw,r L.sr.,xtrM.IwaM+'arwrwrfM,.l.pw.run...
1M......M....................NNI.XIAWb.MU....•/M..,wn..,...4„4.:I...aA.Ir+4'•a,.,..../....p,.gN:(MN.....eq.1.04,1.1.....,..11,...9'VI.. ...,,s..,W. W../Wp:,.AO.:a ttt..W t,A.A..t .µLllaM./..•Y :;J4...T...,MY.r,,4..r•,t......,,,�p1M...,II'/,,,..J'NWM..eN.
14,4&WA„+.y..M: ,..h IC�.X.Y,K..:....Mgl.x..l:p...... .LMS.Kt.»,=6.3.f,.r .Kw1.4 AA...:`....11-...gA,11.11 1..,.NWN...,War f:4fl•M4,.'N.1...1:....1.
Mi.M1..M+.4,,.,.}I,.✓1,r%+.MWO'..IMp.[,Y,..1.11 4.Y.,.WMI.M.gMY{.f,YI.LL{w.1,1X.p:Y1 C"`,..f M,YrtWx;M..1Rh.i 1WN11M71.YK11. .,r^.W1aX.
w.m.Q..— --- .,–...r...,,..a:.. .uad,...-.-r.e' urtl.• I u y J t �”'
�� + " MWNpf1lM♦ ,..w`1r+W, TUwYlu,rarHic..*gss»Ixq
J q W r' 2 c I Pt �" I')(''� r,:� ru r 1' ,�. ° .r..
...3 ...•Y..' w, .1n+,.twut.r,,w..+ti:,nuncwlullwc - .,w:..cwu40,; ..«1.::, w+a+lr..wk..n�,..rw.wvu.etur/.arrw,W,+ww+ru
.r
An t M r' d u.. .r. �.,.,, - ,� ' °..1. .,.r,, „„.m p fir.`" ► y
,.....0, . ...A,..lhro.r M N,w.. M. .aa1P1P,.iw .M4•r llt.t..1.,.:w.vNLM� ....N. IMrn....,,W.......
w. X41... IW IN1..:
r r� .,. tt ,p,,y!,:
Aril,eiCtiPEttt d Inca t:3 .npr x •.a0.t,'.I:I : . e ,
q:..w' KdlW d A M Ya .+C..t ...q.. 1..!,60.1,,. Na. tMatYwuww .....WWww+v....e.—.f..........
IJa Ua.tI.an .F0 640 ��..Mr
rr.+Mri lx,Y rn .45. lA.M.Mly�1MR...14YM+faAwwYN/kYYwHM.Yka..wYN.W+'1hwVTa`f.i+6WW'.r'4YI�/rNItLN551.f 41F.W:Mhb,W11M4W4WwlrM!..hwKi"Mal Y1NAY4.ahWYYMFMYP.M,I.w.�.,iy.,r'/L9.
a....,wa.w»..Nr...wJ...,1,....»..w+.Nt„nw..,.,..,urw 1 0 NOT '11 1,„w�u A.,r E L 1{L r L 3 LINE
w .....w.....1.a..w.........1.0..iwu.wmn•twr«wn cur.........nc.............N,w...1..m,.....'............... ......rc.r.......i4.,.....Y,....r...m.....4M....wNIiWru.u,+:.iw».,rn .....wla
� Y
Spac..,a1 CIond Uon '..1 Decd catJorir,,
' ' .01.4 64.041.4 mrmw•. ..,........0''''....l.....4I..o....i.'wr4.rN wwl........i.. ,
rowaH,r...w'.s,n.X..w+..f1N"h1w.Ylw.u.wl...rtw...MKmww+,Wwwu.
r • Ocrid rig
I I ,.......,...rY,... „,..t.....N--.............,....,.W1 F+.hI.fi..Ktitll.ri'F....,...........„,.......l.n1.„...,„„...K....4i M......K'..,„.......r.k.w.....,,lu. , I
1 I..r.Yw...N.,,,,—„„.1f.w.„,... MYY.'I........+.MNWI....„—.,,.:WrM.,Ud....r..,, ..., ....„....1
JWW..I.N.'.....„ ....Y WN0'.ALtklha,p,,.M,...„...... ....,...,.
n N7• 1 � ...4,M..gttgp.d'uw , ,
O1�"�
Wgw,.Y.14Pw/.o.rN...MMh.w
a .,
• I ina,. In p7 !c'bir r .� E3y 1 � to .
**wow 04,... i.wFipw1.40.4.iwMtl.wl..,ow....kyri...01..1•.4..7.h r o4.44044.40tY6*.tut..ixs:.g.ou, 1q.....,...'A.W....Y,,AA.1.b 11.b4,w4..a tNY..................1 '
,
4
r ..,.,,..u,. . .,, , �... , ..... .. ..,,.. xn ....,.,.,n N,,�,r.«„. ., .u.,.-., ,,., ,. ,..,,. 1 .. . n , ,. .,, ar.. .. . �r,rv,u. . .a,a..Ix 14 r.
1
I