The URL can be used to link to this page

SDR23-75 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. .yr ' • • ;T;;:;:;;;: -: ti n IIIIII till A H E1A i�� hOC IA1 ES Planning .))1/ k..- Eng i ne e ring deSurv,,gin9 November 6, 1975 • 0929605 - Gevurtz Furniture • . Mr. ,Thrald M. Powell, Associate AIP k�. - A% Associate Planner City of Tigard J P.O. Box 23557 :4.6,11"4:''.41"'" �5 7 . Tigard, Oregon 97223 C/7? % 'i Dear Mr. Powell a0 This letter confirms our recent, telephone conversation concerning the public street access to the Gevurtz Property. This issue dates back to the acquisition of additional right-of-way by the Division of Highways for the Bonita Road over-crossing and the severance of direct access to the subject parcel. At that time, the owner of • the property of record was the Southern Pacific Land Company and the Bonita Road widening was coupled with the settlement of the t fi access problem under condemnation proceedings. During this process , the Southern Pacific Land, Company requested P �' and the Division of Highways agreed to provide a public access to the property acceptable to the City of Tigard. As part of the proceedings , the division prepared a sketch of, the proposed access . and submitted to the city for concurrence. I have attached a ' copy of that sketch, which was Obtained from Southern Pacific Land Company files; indicating Nick Hiebert !s acceptance of the pro- . rop' posed access to be constructed by the Divi.ii,. on of Highways. Based on this agreement, the division ha,s a contract for construction • which is to be completed in the near future. As I indicated previously, Mr. Gevurtz had no interest in the pro- r ` ceedings at that time and should bear no obligation if the city desires a change in their agreement with the Division of Highways. Further, it is my understanding in discussing this matter with Mr. David Baldwin of the Southern Pacific Land Company that the condemnation proceeding clearly indicated that the Division of Highways was obligated to provide a public access which p ;� �t would be acceptable to the City of Tigard, which, of course, they felt they accomplished by virtue of the sketch signed by mr. Hiebort. i0553 S>,W,' ALLEN RLVDY, SUITE 223 / t3EAVERTON OREGON 97005 503 543-9410 • • } � ...IW,...i._, ,.lw.._.,.x.,.....,.,.,.. ..,.,w-,w..�„_.,, ,.,.,....�.�.......,.i,.F'_.-._.�....«...�.,.�s.,.,,,.,,.,...�,�..a_,;J�....-...,...-....w., m....a,.�_„4.._....,.�.,....,...,,� .... ,....r..._a....«,.._R...•.w r ,.....,..�.t..,,,.... ._..N,,.� �..«w,,..u,'e,1.,�...t',..it.,.+:.....'_..N.,..«..'r:,n..��,...1%....�,....N.w.�..:a....�,��G.�1...M�....,. 1 1 Mr. Jerald M. Powell November 6, 1975 092r960 • • P a ge 2 • I hope this ass assists you in clarifying the obligations and respon- = sibilities in this matter. Very truly yours, 1= ,. WAXER ASSOCIATES, INC. } Richard C. Wakexr, P.E. President �1 • RCW»a,W Enc. cc: Mr Burton Gevurtz Mr. David G. ;Baldwin Mr. Ronald R. Lee tr • • I (-1 • {�hh r I i Y i i d ✓IC _ .. ,- r ..,., - _ _., .....___...__. ... _ -.— . - • _ t E - -` 1 F.° r 1 4- f J" -e f t . y ` ~, \ ' { y -.1- 1 r.DG. «t ft.-0 V t ..•,S' ) .l - Earrz r F S 7 r. 'I-/Cc tTRJ► •QM��EL ii_µ V y I 1° , �_ r ;, _ 1 - \ I l S i5 M.icNiN SHOP - -_ %s , : —; Cl' i 11- . To \ . r_ t Z • i 2 -‘1 . .„ - fi f - 1261'- f\�• j,l'�' _- i ‘,- s _ r 5 'i \ \ t \ FILE k -ic-Oja WC, •j t r 6°4 Ft - _ 1 i 1 • 5 C-Z'T1 �{CvES A59,7 c:.aNC. F3rIcF COt_►t�s= ASP?4 Cow= wEd1F?iw COUPS / > 11 - 1. I i- e` i S _'' ,3 �f- ':. CLf+.�� -b kt(Ty fJC•tf THifl'.:—f. y Ctl1s_ 'C' 711.c Nam. irt:tta-{‘ --t It 6-1 t • . -.. _ t. t i .c.t. _i 0- r ...ttrt.4 , ! i _ r • \L:-. 1.,...,... . ...._______4:... sriso,_.ici:277.)1.07,2......._;_..7.,..„. _.....,___7_,1,....4.1„„rmi-J-- 0-e.t'i Lf f . 1 sf„....{- _ . F i : t, \ - ___I .v —'� , _E1'i�- Tt'cAT D t°.1tsz —COKE TV,:AT_U :;:::-'4'•tr'__ ,f f c -- '� -- - _ /�-- ___ _1 . - - tie-.• - ,--e f. T•;,{::N. °G" - - -- _ - - ..'.11e ,1 .. 7I ir.—... f �i;17 - - , i _ ..4 / r ,)= - �1.47-7-----------15- f r-- '' I * .vet - -- - - - _ _ - 7� - - - - _- - - - - —, ___. `4`- }SILL f 5.34 d. 3: -_ - 1 1 t--- _0 1 _f. = 144 g t a- •7- r.r,. ,�'".''Ys_ �•yy' �". — r is F - 51�"''�' Si_ t a?,14 AC fTES i 1 1 ., I . - r ¢.7 5 5 •-r::. _ (( FOR SUXFACINIZ.IL T.410E Nur StIO N SEE Sc 1 1OPJ Ar.C•v 4 � � t - 1. I 013I 601\1 S TA E. t i t& d y�f,4 t-_ Dl"f..'iON 1 1 - • _ r �j c fi r {IiFC` _ - .-•x '` e_4 =a - i - F - _ - - - , - _ - a - _- • ._ _ - - 4•- -IO T TO fH1 R - •t=j�-/�j . �- } - - - . }- - - --- - - _-- - - - - - - - - _ - . a -ACC�.C Lh.S 5 i V 1`. •i.. P,l'ci`� . R r Y k{ '°. _ ,' .,:..»•,,._�..... ..r..«...,.. r._.,..4-,.r.. r.........,:±,.-....:•. e..,....« ,.4:x.1.-4:...✓.'.d".;;..4J ..-:«x_I,..rr �.._.a�,ua w.1.1-.;r.«F:nl.w4«f.:,.' I .4.... ..a...w+ ...., !4-c r_:._I:.x..r,-ui—........[rq.r...SY;...+»wr....�✓n,:..,,w,,.v.+� .rr • • • • • • . • M1 r x i *e i Michael, rite 4 "L . man„ AA ' 430 S. W. 14orrisoii, Street Portland Oregon 9720 4 Attent c : Roy 1 w' 4. t,t. : delTurtz 1 • • Dear Ron: , In order to assist you and your client in get d4,. .hag this project ' unc1e way, the planning d par n ent has ppro edi your plans for; building permit. I feel, o 'ev ' `", that tb letter i c i '. �� . cation of the conditions imposed"a by our code requirements d by the v you are c zteot it assuning b t the City's landscaping require- inent must be satisfied before occupancy may be permitted; however, this moans that the landscaping dh ll be installed and complete before occupancy. . . or w,�- h �:r� $i months I 6 6, pl`p ovidin • • adequate cosh bond is provided w ,ard ing h.e extension o ''' the ' s d elks to the pubic street 4 e code provides . t "required „ e s. . ten . .to the side- . / walk or curb o the public street or streets approved .d accepted �, by the Cit.. for public use”. If the access provided by C. IH.D. is •• ouch [ street, then t P o highwa di Yision shall provide sidewalks and curls* . , on the other hand, it - n is not, then it appears that your client shell so provide. ' There was, by the wey, another proviesi,on. o f the Design Review Board's ei:oproval that requires a response. The Desian Review Board requested that sign graphics be submitted for their review prior • o the issuance of sirn. permits. I assume that this is still some way down the roa , ' but will expect to have so i adi time 80 I can get it on a Future Design Review Board agenda. .f y�Thank you. I I I r I P er Mb OW011,0 Assoc. Ali �,� AsclOoiate Planner J IP:pt d A ♦r / 0 t i � I„i .i�.. , 1 ........... . ...... � ....1..-.. 1 el..Y'.., � � .� .. .,.,,.,..a...:I....,.r.-... .. ...,-1,......,...w, ....I.a...4sr. .. ..,.... i ... .,.....n,l.A'.,. i .A-, ,. , October 13, 1975 �, q y 4 1 + Sn4l '� , Jerald M. Powell, Assoc. AIP Associate Planner, ``�� City Of Tigard •. ', P. 0. Box 23557 ° '; i ;;a 12420 S. W. Main ` �� ` : Tigard, Oregon 97223 • i a, Re: File No SDR 23-75 (Gevurtz Furniture) : ' Mr. Powell: ' This letter is to verify our telephone conversation(s) regarding the Design Review Board's requirements for landscape and irrigation plans as per your letter dated August 8, 1975. �. . 'From these telephone conversations it is our understanding that while the '', building permit may now be issued, no occupancy permit will be issued until , the required landscape and irrigation plans have been submitted and approved. I have also been informed by you that Tigard City standards for sidewalks requite that the sidewalk from our building to the street be 5' 1- 0” wide rather than the 2' - 6u width shown on our submitted site plan. I await your clarification of the extent of this sidewalk - whether to our property line or whether it must extend along the access road to Bonita Road, „' . We will instruct the contractor to provide a 5' - 0" :ride sidewalk in con- formance with your requirements. If you require additional information, please call. Sincerely, • , \fell()A f ')N Yilf 1 hiztrooPP Ronald R. Lee / • L , Copy to B. Gevurtz , .I •1 . .c 1 r4 I',y f V:1; „;t lit h! I 4'' H 'l r k 1, w , 1 '+''''S'} ,�yr �� r �a.e { ' 71 gr •I ',`, !4.,•x; j r'A' 1 1t ; , '4 ;1.- 'ff''' qd +',t, '', ,, ,- .' .t,.e', 1 p1. �r, Vu 1:4 ,I:1 .1 y�ry ti � Ir.�,(•rl .� � .Pi ,� '� �9, f. u „r.; + �� v.-. Y• 1��.+kit' I'1 r.'M�,, r'r i�';rlll r,.:�" kA ��_ r, 4,.�1^ JiN I'I 1 r . '4,,' �' wy pry + r ,i1 f { rkr y.rs 11 1 ;+' { :�1 ',, � a�� C tr f �� r :i ; �rr1 Y 1•^ f ,r&r is n w�"? d 4 i, 1'` t oe u (. , .4 d F - p"y 1 :§4'c,',49,1 ' S, , .F 'Iwo a P ,,,,,„.4,„.., u 1 X uPOr r e Or on e 72 t, ; 503 w , i,'■�a,,..l!, � �g.,�' �W■app{ � 7 � �. � „ � h!�,p.�+i 1P1►+�e �1� � (y4 1, J�N�N a g 11 I n'��;■ 1, A�aran F �,.•'P... '4�WY y�■�fyb''1.I�� 1 ing ur.. e c Y.! ^!'14 r' ' �, . .i; 'r Gcity�I Mro"h'Je) '/S CE Jt1111 �3.B Mahn 'AIA hkchdrd ��+ W°eMdti AlA ASPO ,) �rir' `'' j �,1 wd uta meta nr,ar ; `1 ... 1 I A I I ^f y I! a\j , r ,,' \. r M ..,�.. .. ..,... ... „�.. �, -.. -,,. _......,.. .r.x.,..,"..,...,,.,+r.-u..�. ,m.....,.1,1:r�..9:.fvl�.'.-,_�..a.,...«,..a..,,,..,r...,y�.��...-».»u.i..,....F-...AU.. ..I.4. K...,.,....,��...�.•-,�•.__v��...:.la�.,,. v...�.......,-.f.«.. .............. a,.. ,..4, .a....,..11..,1.».- I •ql.l i . • 1. , • ...,,,i :. / ' / I I f ' ' '' ''' ''' ' ''' . ' ' ' . 0. d I 1 , ,,,, ! .. 9W L d'1: -., : , ! . .... . . ' : ,, . - ., ,,, ,...,. ,. .. ' ., ..::.. . ' '',: .: .. , ,,„. . . . . I 5 ./.. . , . . ,.,.! . / . .,, .. .,,,, .., . ,H. „...„,._, . .. .,. ,,.. .;, ..,.. .... . .. ) , ., . ,., ,,' ,„J,. .. I ,:,. , e-H:2 , , • „1. i',, .. .. ,,I .1 . ",„ . . , .. 1, . ., .. , I i . , . , ,1 , , ,1 . . . ., „ . 1 . . ., , ; . . . . . . . , . . , . , ., 1 „. " 1 . I .„ . I I ,, , .. , , . , . . . I ., ,,,,. . . „ . , „d , ,, . „, ..: { , . �• , . . , I , •• , ' August.'80, 197 .• I f. I J iohael1� M'�/k'�iryq andry Lag • ark ' Si ""+,,,1 V 1.,3 0 �`C'�b J:'�,"wv`4.F.Jt+,,MB A"1. `4Y 0 I� • por"bIand, Oregon 97204 ' eferenoe t rile Nod SDR 23-7 ( e rt � tune • • W ex' tY ` , • ' . • Please be advised ' at 'the Ti and Site Deve .omen end Ar hiN eotural • ' Design''Review 3oard, at• their regular, meeting' of July i, I97 ' considered. your olient's ,request for review of a proposed fur1 tur :. ward4ou ,and showroom at 15 arid, Bonita Rd arid your site de igt was approved sUNeot to ° he ollowing', 'conditions •max ,. ... I, �, irr�i ation plan be provided for staff'a pp ova .e ' 2. Detail's Of landsOape plat be provided fo,; staff's approval. , I I A.ryrohiteot lral d.esig eras approved aub je t to the followinx oon, G ' , dr 1.iion 4 b Submission' of aotua graphios of the aig i design. for 1.c app, ova rw I . I 1 4 N W � M 9 fi • • $' . Wim ��ee.�� d�a �.�� I��,e��.��.�� contact a,�:� o�A �.� �.�,� �i� 41 r 1 il you I , ' ''' sided„ additionall formatio r, a siStence. I '; I I I I I i ereely 9 ,1' der&1d . oweUU Assn 8 Al? 4 ' ' I Associate lanner . z , n I �� ti1`' ,) I I I II .j I G. 1 :,.,:,., .,, .I.y.:,,,.,r„, 'I,...r ,.,...1... r..9 ...! :...,, I :, .:; r.�. �.» ra.x.KJlr,m ., ..,.,. ..a .,:•„ i., � r .. n• ,..,. e,l ,.m.,,x•. I ` • ...x.. .,. ,.«..//.w.d ......-.,reF a.._l-5..,. 1-..r.r.0......',......at:_.A«....+nw..,...'+.1...:.,,.'..,.V.»L.1nA......H.w...W..J..1.....1.Y,..4......a+LM..,i.,..U..k4«SA.-... "" MINUTES ' r;. Tigard Site Development and Architectural Design Review Board July 22, 1975 5:00 p.m. -- Tigard City Half. ; 1 12420 S. W. Main St. , Tigard, Oregon • 1. CALL TO ORDER: Chairman McMonagie called the meeting to order at 5:15 m 2. ROLL CALL: . Members present: Cook, Hammes, McMonagle, Olson, Wakem; staff: Powell, Bolen and Laws 3. MINUZES The minutes of the June 10, 1975, June 24+, 1975, and � July 8, 1975, meetings were approved as submitted. 4. PROJECT REVIEWS 4.1 SDR 23-75 (Gevurtz Furniture A request for site design and architectural review of a ,. proposed furniture warehouse and showroom at 15 and Bonita Rd. A. Site Design Review 0 recommendation 1. Staff Report: read by Powell with a.e commenda tl n. • to provide irrigation and landscaping on all sides of building and to pro- �� vide a hard surfaced access to rear loading dock. a Presentation: 'GPry Michaels of Michaels, 2 e Applicant ,� Mann and Lakeman, presented slide graphics and additional information concerning the project. 3. Board Discussion and Action o Discussion of the proposed site design centered rily on access drives and need for paved access to the loading and, maneuvering area at the rear of the building. o Discussion of sign location by Cook and s NlcMona g le, yielded agreement that the locations ! . proposed were reasonable. o Motion to approve (Cook) subject to provision of an irrigation plan and details of landscape plan for staff's approval. o Seconded (Hammes) 1 o Motion approved unanimously f • A , _ _, ...... .....,, •.w...,,.. ,,.... t'-..... ..,..,. .ma.. ..,ie......r.o-.-....+« v„..,........_..n«....1.'J� .a..,... .,,I...t.-.r...6,....n,.., .,.a.....M».1 .....,,,.+:,d.n:..b..,.a.,rM..,1.d,'_+._—«......w...,.4L-.t._u4.:..:a..til....tw............. .....Ar.•..a...-«. t' .:.... • B. Architectural Design Review : o General Discussion of building design ce n tei-ad on the shielding of rooftop mechanicals and the surface textures to be applied on two sides of the building. Some concern was shown by the Board. ' I . for the finish of the sides not shown as broomed. i o The Board further discussed the topic of sign design, concluding that actual design of the signs should be resubmitted for their approval. • • 0 Motion to a pp ro v e (Cook) subject to submission n of actual graphics of the sign design. o Seconded (Wakem) o Approved unanimously. 4.2 SDR 16-75 (Lincoln Properties Sign) A request for review of the location and design of a project ' identification sign at 72nd and Hampton'. �I A. Staff Report: read by Powell B. Applicant Presentation: Mr. Ron May (Gilley Co. ) representing Lincoln Properties, 1 '; testified that the design now presented was a result of pre- vious comments made by the Board �z and that he felt it satisfied criteria they had applied. C. Board Discussion and Action . 1 f o . The Board briefly discussed the sign, and its location. , o Motion to approve (Olson) . o 1 E Seconded (Hammes) . . o Motion carried unanimously. 5. OTHER BUSINESS o. "t , 1 5.1 Larry Bissett presented a model of the proposed Oregon Bank Building and a revised landscape plan to satisfy requirements Board's previous approval ('with "7 survey also pointed tut, that unfor �ov� , It was P p ed o se original�� al SDR � had resulted in a need to redraw the site plan with the en problem �w�th the� .y(�J y resultant loss of parking p . . f l4s .. solution r tO the problem had been designation o compact parking spaces in place of 4 regular spaces. • I j SDR Minutes - July 220 1975 - Page 2 r I i y 'Olt • ..::i6«..,....,,..»...'„'. ....... ....... .....:.. .,. .A N.._ .....,.. ,. ,. ,,4w......,,a.s ,....,..,......Mal.» ,.......,._M:i.a,;i....w.,.v,..;......a.uw..._.., ,.,U,..m...«.....«.,.4:.i.,".'.. ,:M..,.,.c ..,.,,.,...x u...... .,..,i.. i„ , .r o ' Staff pointed out that, at the time of the original ,I, Design Review Board meeting, the applicant had been unsure of the type of materials he would use. r ` o The applicant said that at this time they had worked • ,, e o.pplic y out the technical difficulties in using "slump block" ";'; and that the building would be as had been originally shown to the Board. o Bissett pointed out the addition of street trees on Pacific Highway. o The Board notes its approval of the concept of street ;1 ' tree planting and asked staff to pursue obtaining a roval by the i Highway Hi hwa Division. Pp y ion' of other as of the e lan followed. ;.. o General discussion pests. h p 0 Motion to approve as submitted (Cook) as an s amendment to % , the earlier Design Review Board approval, requesting staff to recommend approval of the street tree theme r to be State Highway Dept , o Seconded (Wakem) o Motion carried unanimously. 5.2 Extension of a previously approved parking lot for Assembly ' of God Church on SW Gaarde. A. Staff Report: Due to the character of this request for review of an , • extension of an existing project, no new site design . review was bein required uired and that due to the time g o, constraints on staff and the limited time available for review of this project, no rrbaff report had been provided. o Staff described its concerns with the rop osed p p • project which were: 1. Scale of the shade trees was unspecified. Staff feels that shade trees provide d in the landscape islands ought to be of sufficient size to shade a good portion the parking lot an d break up the expanse of unshaded asphalt. 2. The screening provided on the Gaarde St. side ,-of; the parking lot appears insufficient. 3. Ground cover in the areas not 'planted with major shrubs is specified on th.e plan by note. Staff i requests that a planting interval sufficient • , DRB Minutes July 220 1975 -- page 3 • ( E u .»....._.. ..__..............,_»1.;...«».......,.,..... -..,. .,. .,,........_, ._.,,.....«.......,...,-,,....m.....+...,.,,�'....,..».......1,«...i M.«.»,w.r..,,.m...,....,....«ddn.l w...C,:,'.:ah..,....,,,a!i...:.«.J.wu..;. _w.. ,.,u a+„n+,'.a-,...... ,,......,... 1 ',a3.,...,, .i..,-.L.'�.a..r:LnN+...y,.aa... t • n to ensure ground coverage and to ensure survival of the planting be agreed upon. 4. The site plan does not show this project's relationship to the existing access to the ..\ church and the circulation pattern is therefore unknown. 5. The long row of diagonal spaces nearest Gaarde St.should be broken up with at least 2 land- " . soaped islands such that no more than 6 or 7 p unbroken row. spaces would be ��,,in any one urib B. Mr. Olson, designer of the parking lot, speaking for the church, said that ground cover in the form of ivy , and Oregon grape would be provided and that he felt that planting,intervals and so forth could be afrived ` . at with staff. He also said that it vas his 'irAtent that large shade trees such as Norway maple be pro- vided in the parking areas. Mr. Olson indicated that at the request of the Dept. of Environmental Quality, they had, contacted `I'ri-Met, who had in turn voiced interest 'in the use of the parking area for a park and ride station during the week. C. Staff Recommendation Staff recommended that: 1. ' Ground cover �be provided in those areas not r covered by shrub plantings, particularly along banks adjacent fences. 2. That arborvitae or a similar evergreen screening pl ant i ng be p rovided on Gaarde to screen een the parking lot. 3. That an irrigation system be provided. 4. That parking spaces 1 thru 7 be revised to allow adequate back out, 5. The two landscaped islands) 6 s p aces apart, be i shown on the south side on the side of the parking lot nearest Gaarde St. Those landscape islands N r„ and lands provided a � the� central �landscape� is � to be rov�.ded. 1 with 6 or 7 structural shade tre es placed in a random pattern D. Board. Discussion and Action o Olson moved to approve per staff recomrriendationS With the exception of item 5 and adding an item to require that the 6 or shade trees requested by staff a ff be DRB Minutes - July 22, 1975 - page 4 ..w • N��«»..,T«. ».. ..d. ...,..»..m. _.......•,w,...«...1.. s.4.....:.n..kv.«..».»....,..•,.,.F,..... ....«•.. ',.,.....,..+«.._...,....._,-,,«\s..,..M...,.....-.,.......».w4',4.4,—,4+,;...»....:d..4...zi..444..,.,•. ,Jw,-.;.:,.,1Mt.......,;.+..tr.......,.a,. .„ eke n..��..,.s._:�k:�.44, 94,..»nw.r»,.:.,.�..a_,•.,.,,:V1«w..v.:...: placed within the parking islands shown. o Seconded (Hammes) o Motion carried unanimously 5.3 Staff passed out copies of a memorandum suggesting criteria h . for design review of signs in commercial zones. (See exhibit attached) . No discussion of this item was requested at this time, rather the board was asked by staff to look the suggested criteria over for discussion at the next Board meeting. 6. ADJOURNMENT: 6:30 p.m. • DI.3 �rute s July � 1975 p g� 5 i /. . - • / ....,.m«I—.._:1.a ....�..._ .x...._..r..:J"I . .x..., ...a« ,...c k..,.r.J'.t.'....,.i....wU..r-..,7i.N.:.,..,.....w.,rJ..A..,arisu.,r.....:«..1(.:.,..l......«.-...h 5 . - STAFF REPORT Tigard Site Development & Architectural Design Review Board , July 22, 1975 • Agenda Item 4.1 SDR 23-75 (Gevurtz Furniture/Michael, Mann & Lakernan) „ Site Design and Architectural Review of a proposed furniture warehouse and showroom at 1-5 and Bonita Road a Staff Findings .. 1. A conditional use for this project was approved by the Tigard Planning Commission on March 18, 1975 (CU 6 -75) subject to the following conditions: a) All parking areas and access roads will conform to City standards. b) Future expansion will require a new conditional � use permit. r 2. Submitted plans lack an adequate landscape and irrigation plan -- applicant has indicated that this will be provided. See also "addendum.,to Design Review submitted drawings". i r1 1 3. "Rough grass" zot sufficient, • 4e Parking ant access appear adequate, 5. Free-standing sign on freeway appears to be excess Staff feels that adequate identification can be achieved with building-nc.un±•ed signs shown on elevation sheet, with a free--standing, sign provided at the entrance to indicate access route. Staff Recommendation to be given fol lowing presentation inform ation ation of additional info " on by applicants I t; i I ' I a 4 • • N . N' • • • • is • 15 July 1975 Planning Department City of Tigard 12420 S.W. Main Street r; ••� Tigard, Oregon Attention: Jerry Powell • Subject: Gevurtz Contemporary Furniture Jerry Pursuant to our discussion July 9, 1975 1• am forwarding to you this Addendum to the Design Review Submittal Drawings delivered to you on that date. I { believe I have covered all of the questions you specified at that meeting. }' If you have further requests or require additional information please advise. Thank you. Sincerely, d1. , Ronald R. Lee • ENC. l •... I. , t' ,, r i ,ai''tj4F1 1 1 r k�,�Niq, u♦' ty; �� ' ,v • � 1i1 ] ,,,,y"•, Y{�rj� � , � i ?, ., ,4' i r r k • i "$,,,,.�• 1r .1,�•t. ...i�� ,1Y;.n,rr.C ...�sU:,-., .r r � ,'„ �. a: F.m.. I..F.4 .,, ..J Cyr t A '�i � �fK k,r I..A 1..�,:dr( i .;�: -„ �.,> .. .. yy;'�e �.�� `Y '.( ,r.i.. fA I 1• f i IkiO,h ,h � r; t f...F, .I. �•,i �. � � .,.,�.,,r,�(... ,.A„I 1'1 ,�4§' �':� f 1'.ts.� �' �. .?.1 � � �, i .,'y�%;� �, ^7 ✓Y�{''ri � '�,.., „i. i.i.. '�„d M1li.i} �.:.,"'..r•, �„ 1 L ..�°,aid ,.. •"• ..' � � '.I,.;�,�.i� 4• f:,,, .,i,.0 1 .`�,. .. r'6:..,.Y.rr ',� f:r: �, ,'ac r°" S I,�a. �": e•,•"(.-., � „ :!, ��. k .cif. '.•x"�11 1' ;�'1,” Y ��((yp''��yyW�11, } �'� 3 1 i i,i. -Y. !•t' §(r :., I f xF:,'.., /AY i„.. I. 7,� w �.1 1 r➢., 1• ;. ,�_...r, T a,,..q .' ',� �iw,i. {�"1 {{ "'y�. fi"��,�� 1 } ,r:� ..:lye.;.�e./E� 5e i� I tit.,�e� '•"" y,�,,��a. '.. ,. .;i '�',... 1i � I�T t r i. � .�ni. 1. ,i, .r'dx.: k-:, I .+.� • 'I i'411,T �� ar ',I,,: h '�,.i i�r��t' i., , •� y,'' ,i „ ,� ,•( .r' i'.�. �ly� ;fie -' a=�� I '11 rat. i,� �y� r �,1 �, ^, i hi i'.. ,1kk,1rr S! � et ai i r ,� A� I. q IGa �1,, � . 4. ;7 ,� t,'f, . �1'. (', e� ?Ra r. (�Wr�,. r, a.a k I' +.r'�'i�� i1 y�•1r'f io �f 1 ;I� }�yl f X1>?,r'�t*�1e�6 p�."rl: �, 1r, ,� r�-.. „fir .I r 'Its J M� k.; f i., • 1,� 1:., .1.. .1. ';1 tip�l, � •.r�Aii � wv"dVk` � � �6„ ,` 1 s'4'�i 1 1�,,;T,�;r �.�'. t r P�'w,,,� {; 1, / .a 1 �.�i 1`` ��,P,, ,i'r' b 'x .1d.�'t'tr... ��"' pt�• i, v ar� p`�',i., �`1.. r. :t.«A1.. ... ��.. �� r �. �i�' g?' /�"Y, "e.'1 , t; yp�,II '�, •.+ t r • 7 I ��=,.:,dap M1, 1 p h". o tii. . *' �tl � 'y ��,,, i'a' ,.r. t1 n ` �, ��4 p�/.A� 1 ''�djr 1;, i.•,s „�.� i� ,�, 4 k� �. ��C 7� X11+1 �.+ ''� �epF"� J ';� h�� '$• �1.i,� I, ,1 � ,....,..d..a'1�, ,,..�».,.,'�d....'')Gary 1.".'Mk hciel rl '�Jdrfle$ D' Mann AlA ,Richard E 44A, 'A po,1yy trY 114Iecr4160 OPIW „i 'r..4■.3'v4A'. il, . • , I 1• • t 15 July 1975 • Planning Department City of Tigard , 12420 S.W. Main Street i Tigard., Oregon I ADDENDUM TO DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL DRAWINGS Cevurtz Contemsorar Furniture ~ Interstate 5 and Bonita Road, Tigard, Oregon 41 t The following items add to, revise, modify, or clarify drawings submitted for ; your review on July 9, 1975: rt . ' Item 1. Sitework and Utilities. ••• , A supplementary Site Plan indicating proposed grading, site drainage, . . and other utilities is being prepared by Murray-McCormick, Inc. , Consulting Civil Engineers and will be delivered by them, to you for your review. 4 item 2. Vehicular and Pedestrian Access . 4 , Access road, service road, and parking areas to meet City of Tigard • Standards for commercial access drives as required by Section 190-6 e. • \ Curbs , where required: 6" extruded concrete curbs, :typical d • ' • Extend 30" wide concrete walk as indicated on Supplementary Site Plan to provide required pedestrian access . . , Item 3 . Landscapi. . • ..i All Rhododendrons to be 18-24", Balled and Burlap. Mixed vaiety: • Blue, purple and violet tones• dunip pfitzeriana Aurea at locations indicated on drawings. Ground , , I cover at other areas (atarkcd ''Native") to be Rough Grass or egiValent . Existing blackberries to be removed. • Existing trees to remain as iri'.iicated on drawings submitted. Sizes, condition, and types of trees existing will be described at the time E . of our verbal Presentation if requested. L ' ` S.',,,,,, 1. rS,9 :),,,,,,7,!,,,:.:'.,(0 't�l idl f"' , 1 AA 7 ��/+.. ,',. r. f»., �∎0,7.1,- .4,-,i a 0,,,, y�. pit r o f iii i' i , e rrp,r4.,;''„ , t,�1 „1:,,,,,V4'7,- Y''' ., r. ;,,i u';'1',, i�i;MGN ,A r',-,' yT, r ag, i r,, ;, '! ;; �'" � ' r t R F y'� [: ` � � .SJ;;+r 7�'��a i<-';irr't t` 1,"'.! 'io"�r,C ;1.,'A yw-S, `,. *,�, at 1 4'�';�y `pay+,lyd k', h ,�, ,1, s ��, �S �.t ,[ "rfb 61,r ��. :� r ,�� F.4 �,'„d' a .�. �'� 1 .1 u i t r i r +� � iy r�� n( .a.L, juH 1,,i „ ,,rig' ,�r.4t� � ,, r 6 t..!'� �f�,�,,,� L•+�� S�-,,, . E rt'q i ;w 7 1•_ y , .� I k,,,, { dr'7i ':,', f''"'� ./nY' a ;4 °'l.1 �� ''F'„1` i Y1"..;,'7 i" 3'�inP � ik�f�.',Ji. h�'%` �� t 'f ! ,� �t 71.:. ��"{'�� .a«a '�i��,'�,, � ,S. ,,y '�E�,d! � :{�j Y t..�� •x,'-� .b.Y'r •S •+'� � ¢, � C� ,��!''� 44if�. w�• i k��. 54'' � 1 t« � n{ �' ��h,�;v �. I��sa•i r �"„.+a' + a �� ,II . ,,. j'a . ',,,,,`� nt; 1 1' W �n,< 1 �5'. ."�? d '� .� r4 �,', ,6:, ,W 1,4,4,r,' "at .I . rrr , ii,', k,, ,,,, 'j. -'4a 1r. *r. # ,i r,.. G a A "N 1 ” t9 h' .r ,,211 .:l ,�""''1� d Iy({Y.• , ,' '',1�'� ' q1 r, ��,i q.�A�. W; 1 pa,?i' . .i�11� �, r d,v!r�h.��,`i �.; ,,,f� w'.' .'. nti� : 4, �� :�� 1 1,M}. �f�� eYt,1'�4 x W i,/1.r�_?" t Y ,';, 4.:„4 q„ r ,'„� i1: ''',V1'v 1 , -„,1.� 1 Y. i ' ,� y x.' ,, l')., , r:w,�ry ,,;rx`i�°r� ��"lr�jtb�fk% n1 i wY�f, �� ,,1 tt.,� • t 1.''+ �,� Lf�yi+,d' V.dX .fir, Ipai+,.. (�1, "A 'Lft,4,, �A, c, "" �, „ gi_1,,: ' ' 41f,,,,, ai•�'�.�G,:',1 '.'$. i-{..' •t,I,. �`it vwy4�• .�,�. j: ,,liv i. F 'v . „A” $,,lrl, ' A44,,+`41a ;N.' A' wg 't +� „t y ,i.CM r., " .la:l',d. 'r Yi�., * "�nMp r,.,,l f. n 4,V �P!" !k ' F 7" .'I.,.6' '4.'t ,, � � J, d,-'p i� � � 99.�� } ��ifV.v eF.� �� wr„ 'i !.. ,��'G� .��'•" 4 14'q JY. +,,f; xil� 1�, F�- ti,..t tfry {r r � � °�, 4�.. t 6�r �1 t lx ,1'iaW.fi�' ?.a .'QC's-� a, r '.�� ,.iF2` 1 k � i Yit . �� • r � ,'3 i " b r. . at, M L ''4. , r';, 1't" '"i i Irr. r �', ,yxPAf�i,7 � 1 ,+, {�, nu..,�y��Y�� !t 3YfI,.N r4 xr� 1 .+�, �y !�, �'�' y� .�s:nr�.- r + l''''.'' M, b v '0.�,� 'e ''' ^w �'!`i Y n,,,i,: ■r _ , 4r ,J,,.,i:,. '.71i i .0 w #-r:',�,y„ x9: ,,, ',j it 1.�7N ��,��,�� 1., 'hf 1V y.4• ♦•M. �,�{.Y ��\ ",•,,,„'‘i�,� 1�':.y � 1�, �� fJ Yrf� �rL � � �C ',, rMM1, 'I,h „�•�' j ' Y, ? ♦ �1 ,'-,, " 1.1p.3 ,�it,'',7 as ,',,f Fpi. ;t ∎i M1 a. � ,� �r � >,�� .�r� ' � ,�d .n,�� "1�{{k'°`'r'��•Z}'1.•t •. i A� "� i�r+1,{[ {',i'�17s *•�,:.uan-466, � s. v ''' ' ;t '5_ TB'Ir' +; J'.jr'' r ;l ' ''' f'�y4 : Gy'�Ci`r r} °'. w ,�y' 1,: y p��4 a. *! AlA 7, C. y,.....,�k h i �0..,,, +',ti«!' pit t� A;,a�.� "` 'c1�iy S.r i iF„#�`� ° 1,.�'?{k7 T I R � ��,.�,w.. �� h W+i M•*�rl,. !'�IF'1 3 E+:�ard ,i,�,87t... `{v'�. /•'1�` '..,,f illv,y,� nl'wi.v'! , yq � w;r G Tk, .�• r � d� P��a�w�,T t„a•.�,M an.l nk�.. i r � P ADDENDITI4 TO DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL DRAWINGS (cont,) fs. Gevu'rtzl Oont �orayr F"urni tore Interstate 5 and Bonita Road, Tigard, Oregon Item 4. xra atione Irrigation system to be provided at developed landscape areas. Design and extent of irrigation layout to be submitted in detail to staff for review and approval prior to issuance of building permit:, Item 5. Til511.1 Ooncrreete Wall Panels. Exterior walls to be Tilt-up concrete panel construction. Panels at North and East elevations to be seeded exposed aggregate finish. • f, I • I M � I I irl 'I ..., y .,,. ...__ ,,. a. ..,,. ..,.,��..,,,. ... .,,1 .. , .,.,. ,.,,•. . . ..,... ...... .. .......... u,..... ... ..�,. ..,.I... ......w ,i,.. lI ... .i ., .. ,,.., r.. ..,,.., ..,..i e.Y, 1 • September 9 1976 Mr. Bud Gevur ; 210 S.W. Morri so:n Portland' Oregon Re: SDR 23-75 Landscape Bond-Gev'urtz Dear Mr. Gevurtz, Recent site inspection of cevurtz Furniture on Bonita tld. has shown that several elements of the landscape plan have yet • to be implemented. These elements will be itemized below and must be satisfied before the landscape bond can Le released. Landscape plan deficiencies: 1, A large percentage of the ivy plantings are in poor ,.,' condition and should be upgraded now and next spring. • 2. Twenty-one "Santa Cruz" Firethorn Pyracantha 18-24" B & B need to be platted in the northbbed as per landscape plan. 3. One undersized Verna , Witch Hazel in the north bed be replaced (3-4 ' B & B Required) 4. Five shore pine (8 - 10' b & b) be planted in north bed as per plan. 5. Undersized or dead Oregon grape in north bed be replaced (Oregon grape should be 15 - 18" B & 8) . Fourteen azaleas be planted on northeast eorne as per plan (41 azaleas specified 27 existing) . 7, Four shore pine (8 - ,1O' b & b) be planted in east bed as per plat . 8. Three eulur uaar crabapple or flowering cherry (2 2.6" caliper B & 13) he planted against east wall as per plan. Zn addition the northwest corner of the property has a blackberry p on as as future maintenance would consist of spot spraying the and weed best solution berries and weeds with a systemic and removing u the l tic yk after they are completely dead;' a ^ rr n . `• 1 • _.,. ...,a, ,,,,..- -...��.,.r r .A _-, ,w.rf..x_.,..r�•ti-+., e.-_......._.. ,._.w.,.JA. t:.+...i,...�..J.n', ..... .p�...,...�,......,...+...._.,_.•1�...,w.,,_.r�uc..lu�M....M. �rA1..�.«::J n.«,•. ,xr. w_.x-... _w.-.._..._....,_Nr 4e....._...._ ,.vt.:.YC�� n r I I Se to er 9 a 176 Page • , I i T would also like. to thaflk you for removing your directional ' 1, ins so,' promptly,p ' If you have any .cjuestions about the above items or the sign ' code please do tat hesitate to call. ' Sincerely M I . i' ' ,ancy Iki aµr ds . h �rL.��y W�•` ��-�}yyyy lanne y� l 14111.;sf , 1 P . , r 1 yj r . • 1 I !' 1; I .. ,....'.,...,,;,.'.'":,:.1.r.' .'L n .n, .. r. „,,...i, 'I'A'r " .,r„_ ..,. ,q a„.....,rrd KK @.1. ,J.:;',,.,+,w ..... .., w.'/1F,.»1..r-«I r.Y xc.M,:,.....•:',1,..a1u...,.•:.whr,.... ,.. ., d.� wx -i i...., 1.I rot... /r JI::.:+;:. ..d.0„.i.....,.. ,r _ „„ 0 , 7 . . kvoi.d Verbal, Messages ;t {_ - . - -- - - - - - - 1:,• -CITY-- OF TIG.t i• - To - - - , ,ri, -- From: - -1� :, - - - Subiect: - , Date: f - i _- - -. = �. ` y - - _ ' - p7 . �G-.=- { l r- vma- {4--a. - am.- _ r _7 - - ,.,, tG i - ., Y l ! - `'� - i i .1 - v - s / "� e__4-�j s-c-14-f``c - ,G� -� - _ : l� � '°=�-j-{.-1C.f e f,i=' f ? r f - I ! _ - - ..., - - _ _:__ 4:,:rc---_,/,_ _ , . - d, _ .. -,,, ,,,,,..-,,- --- - 4 „y_._. e -- 7 - - _ ,. , _ ,__ _ _. _: _ :,E _ ,,..._ir,„ _../_....,_,..- _. ---,,,...,..„_ __,- , ,,x-7(..„,___,, ,....", ,.,-._..,....A(_.,,,,,,,.......,..E..-z,.,.."---_,--2-.. „...„--f...4:4-2_,,,--.4„,- ---- -- _..,,,<.?.-",c,....„,__,: __ __ - -- -_-___- : „ . _ _ _-_. _ . _ _:. „.......,___ , ,..„ ......,.....,. . . _ ,....._ f- - - F -- 4• 0-?,-z..„ - - - - T-- -- _---_----__� - ` / ` I = �' e ' z , Ec ,� .� e-{=yam -� -G` _ - -• .f- n- . ---- -, - i . ..e. =f` -- _--- - ! - --- -- -- 1 ti --= Yom.-- (1-et" z- - -/V -,,..il � �L.,- �"�_�C%,._- �C�- "-�'-". -- - - - - - - - --- - - r f� 3�G . cam' _ � � '.."7:•,:-: ;1- -r'47 :. -t0 _ c. . qtr{c- C '2C -si r ` _ Si« �0 ff-rr 1' t' ` �s'f — / r6-__ f ../'"�'f-�i>"er-2.c.-� ` t t L' _ 2,.'^.� ,..( " i f - -- rt '`� 7 - ;1:--- „feC .v= ,s est ty'e � .-G'yts =a"=r_ ,y �R,,-' " ; - -Z." - _ a�-, .- , - yr .. - •...... rl.. ..,.....',1..1..rl.. ..•.....wu............„,...rM»..,.r t.... _„.unt+.4.,.,_....,...J.»_..•..••....,...r....,....I:....x.,,...IM,...x....-.i.,..w...-:..4r,a..N..v.i...._..,.w.J'r.,,C:...IA.....I «__.,.v..•,ir....ln.-+r....rti..+J'.,r.+..,,M.r .•r.««M'.IA....ti l...-•,_.. .,•«.,..-.fit n m...w-«r.,h. r:.rM1' yt6 71 • t 111GARC) ' CITY OF TIGARD • 'wee► o� o „� P. I O. Box 23557 12420S, W. Main 1 Tigard,� Oregon 97223 9 o 9 , May 24 1976 Mr. Bob• Pershing Oregon Sign Corp. P. 0. Box 42106 . Portland, Oregon 97242 M A Reference: File No. SDR 17-76 (Gevurtz Furniture) Dear Mr. Pershing: Please be advised that the Tigard Desi gn Review Board, at their re gu lar meeting of 5/11/76, considered your request for sign approval for Gevurtz Furniture Co. and your submission was approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. An adequate landscape mound be provided under option 71B". 2. The location of the freeway sign be moved to its original location as shown on the site plan. 3. The landscaping be submitted for final staff approval. Please be sure to have your client read and sign the bottom. of this letter and return it to the City of Tigard. Sincerely, Dick Bolen Planning Director DB:pt cc Bldg. Official •• I Era.gr, Supt. I I -�: The following i o led ment must be the City of • �, Note: e actin w' received by � y Tigard within fourteen (14) days of your receipt of this letter. Failure to return this acknowledgment may result in action by the City of 'Tigarde I hereby acknowledge e d d e thi letter documenting o.cumentin g the ac tion of the Tigard Design rd ve sib r n.eview Board. I have received and read this axd agree e + to the decision here documented and to abide any 'arms end/or con.- ditions attached. ern, .zqc ry , I �x,�ktat�.rel date I , . 1 ( ..'1 n...... .. ......,._, ,.- ,.... ,._.,..., ..,., .1L...... .,.._,.i._.,._....,_... _ ...., ,M ,. .,,....,,. .-..,».....«.'+.-.««4 .......u-.-,.-.u...«r...•,,,....-....M.1..1U,;.14.,...,u 'i,i:,.,.Aa„,..,o.,,.'.:d«..„, .,wrK,...,a,d,.n..l_..,.... Na° MINUTES Tigard Site Development Plan & Architeciarai Design Review Board May 11, 1976 -. 5:00 pam• General Telephone Building '- 12460 SW Main St. , Tigard, Oregon 1. CALL TO ORDER: Meeting called to order by Chairman McMonagle / •” at 5:10 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL: Present: McMonagle, Hammes, Olson, Cob]c, Goldbach; staff: Daniels, Bolen, Laws h APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes of 4/27/76 were approved as' submitted. 4. COMMUNICATIONS: None. • 5. DESIGN REVIEW: • 5.1 SDR 14-76 (Ray Martin, & Bill Walker) �I I, e uest for design n review of a proposed 4 plex subdivision Arq g` p :� � at'' 124th & Walnut. A. Site Design Review , 1. Staff Report: read by -D .niels. 2. Staff Recommendation: TApproval with. following conditions: 1) Additional landscape:. screening be provided adjacent the buildings abutting the residential zone. 2) The bank on SW Walnut be sloped to provide a more even transition with the grade level of the project and planted with a suitable groundcover ' such as ivy and such plan being submitted to staff for approval.—... , 3) Thy juniper plantin es adjacent the entrance drive be wiltonii type. the 4) Two street lights placed on the be p existing utility poles on Walnut, and on both sides of the entrance drive. � i Park) .n� stalls to be 1{9 1 by �yy-1-r with `bumer ra,�is. M Y ./' ) Y � 6) A concrete sidewalk to be placed adjacent to . SW 124th and an asphalt path from its terminus at Walnut to the entrance drive on Walnut;, 7) Backing space be provided at the northern most • parking stall adjacent building 4, 1 .,«.._.,r.,..a. -.- ...„_. ..,,.......... .....«.,._..,_,..,...._a .. ...r.-w,.sx.,.,..-...<'n., .. .w..<..,...1...,_.....,a.......u..,.,._...a.�i,,......t..,.:.l,w:..i__..,,u.,.,..a.._.....».A..e...... . .,,,nt'..,,.a.+i.Ly.,..w�«.,.-.,Rw...4.1.,.1s........+dn'a4'.,.»,,.e,..,.r .,..,...,«,......,i.:.«_.... , page DmB Minutes 5/11/76 8) Access drive to be widened to 30 ft. 9) Any sign placed on. the site to be utilized for ,. y identifying the project be no larger than 16 sq. ft. and subject to site design review. , 10) Utility service to buildings shall be underground. y il) Patio enclosures shall extend perpendicular from the building, being of the same length as the fences proposed to partially enclose the . patios. Daniels responded to a question from Cook that the sidewalks will be located as to continue the location • of the existing sidewalk with a row of street trees between the sidewalk and the curb: i 3. Applicant's Presentation �. h o . • day Martin stated that he agreed with the sts.i':f � • recommendations and that more pine trees can b; } placed adjacent to the houses between his develop- ment and the adjacent subdivision on the north. lie asked that the drive be narrowed in order to save 4 trees existing on the site. 4. Board Discussion and Action o Cook moved and Hammes second to approve the site design plan with staff conditions, changing r 3 condition 11 to apply only to b�uzldi�ags 2 & ,� and to permit a 28 ft. curb cut in order to pre - serve the large cherry err t s g h y r�� at that point,. B. Architectural Review 1. Applicant's Presentation Mr. Ray Martin presented the building materials and colors to be used in the project. • 2, Commission D scussion and Action • o Cook inquired about the grades of the building. 1 o Martin responded that all would be close to existing grade with a berm put up against the r foun�.ata.o�� of building 4. � o Olson; stated that the architectural portion of the presentation is lacking in that it was not well prepared, d a a page 3 � DRB Minutes 5/11/76 -7; o Hammes moved and Goldbach second that the architectural design be approved. 0 Motion passed by majority voice vote with . _.-. Olson and Cook dissenting. 5.2 LINCOLNWOOD OFFICE PARK A request to place an 18 sq. f-h. wall sign at Lincolnwood Office Park (SW 72nd and SW Hampton St. ) A. Staff Report: read by Daniel B. Staff Recommendation: Approval C. Applicant's Presentation: Mr. Dave Douthit, manager of Lincolnwood Office Park, summarized the request, Board Discussion and Action: o Cook said he found the graphic presentation to be • inadequate for review purposes: , . ' , • o Cook moved and Olson second to approve.' the request. o Motion approved by unanimous voice vote„ . 5.3 SDI. 10-76 (Great Western Chemical) Review of a proposed dock enclosure at 11440 SW Tiedeman. , An Staff Report: read by Daniels. B.--,Staff Recommendation: Approval. C. - Applicant's Presentation: Applicant was not present. n.J. Board Discussion and Action o McMonagle asked if the dock was presently covered. o Daniels responded that the request is to enclose the existing open dock 'area o Olson moved and Goldbach second to approve the, request. o Motion approved by unanimous voice vote, o Olson asked that staff notify applicants of meetings. • • ' ' " • .,.,..,.......,._i...'.a.i..,..•....—,..n ...,..,, .. !.......'.G„a i, .: a Jj,.....,.,k .-f', ..,_.,.,_...n................_«.,.......J.w,,., «_«l e.-:.L'x:...,w...w..»,..-.« ....u:.:i,..._. a..,...,..,...r;.....,... 'I..•.,.n, . ««a..«..-.,..,.a....,, , ( page -1 ii DRB Minutes 5/11/76 �' , 4. o Daniels responded that the applicant had been notified at the time of submission when this item f! would appear on the agenda. 5.4 SDR 11-76 (Gerber Legendary Blades) I An expansion, of an office building at 14200 SW 72nd Ave. A. Staff Report: read by Bolen, B. Staff Recommendation: Approval with following conditions l Plan be revised to include additional landscaping in the following areas: ; a) on either side of the entrance drive (as a /. suggestion, evergreen trees such as. cedar could . be placed along the drive from the pond adjacent !r :. the freeway to the west property line) . b) Landscaped islands he t weep t i,e' entrance drive and the parking lot can be considerably en- ' lar ed with no adverse effect on vehicular I circulation :n c) A 10 ft. landscaped strip, to include evergreen and deciduous trees, be placed along the west i . property line d) Evergreen shrubbery to be included on the north ,' property line. !� 2. Trees specified on the plan should be a minimum siz e of 2” caliper.e 4 I w ^w � 3, Final landscape plan be submitted to planning dept. �� for approval. 4. Irrigation plan be submitted to staff for dpproval. .. o McMona g le stated that compact p arking spaces, although inadequate in area according to code requirements, are spaces that are provided in excess of the minimum 1 required and may be needed. ' If 1 o Bolen responded that the recommendation to eliminate I . these isPo.oes was based on the need to increase the landscaping provided on the site; which appears to have suffered due to placing the maximum number of i y parking spaces on the s�t�eb .l g � i I ...• ,.,.., .:,,, ,. ...', :,„ ,.,. .:,, .„ ...... :... .. .. ,,..,....... .,, .. ,...n,,. . ,,, ,. ...o,...,. a., .a..n ...I...,,,,„4 w,,,.,.,J....,.,.. .,. .. wd ^a r.. ..N...,....4, _. w. .,.,.. M, ,, '.G nr.,, u.., .. .._ as ,,.i,...,.,,_.. w» •u.,. w a,.,_c,,.z .— ' • • i page DRB Minutes :.-- • 5/11/76 , • I h C. Applicant“s Presentation• o Mrs. Anderson, contractor for the project', stated that"Gerber.Blades presently has 23% landscaping 4 on the.. site and that the need had arisen to provide ' for expansion of the plant. In order to do this, • they needed the maximum number of parking spaces for their employees ees or' they would be required to move in the near future. y • 0 Mr. Krause; architect for the applicant, stated • that the number of parking spaces provided were the maximum allowed on the site and were needed because • of overlapping shift changes which require as many • ' ' • � . parking spaces as possible to accommodate approxi- mately mately 100 employees on each shift. o Bolen—stated that by using 450 parking spaces, 16' extrauld be created, thus providing for the, 10' landsce setback between this property and the site to the 'e s t. o Bolen stated that) the need for the 10 °ft. buffer strip „vas to allow for design flexibility on the parcel to the south and not preclude the develop- , • merit options of the adjacent parcel. pro- vided could be r r. Anderson �5ta•� wd that a 6 �.t• buffer c .l b p vided on the west .side. • o Bolen graphically illustrated how the landscape • at the parking could t -Lhe south end. of the r ark n rows 'co 1 r ws plantings g be ex�,psnded' so as to give more direction of the drivin aisles o The p, co. ntract o r stated that they would be willing to o plant -the area west of where the stream turns s ou t h long: the •.q south property line with adequate ground- I cover and. evergreen trees. . I o Cook moved and Olson sec.end that the s t : design be approved with staff conditions and the additional requirement of an irrigation plan to be submitted to staff. o Motion approved by unanimous voice vote. B. Architectural Review • 1, Applicant's presentations Mr. Krause stated that • I . I „ - .i., 1 ,, ,i . ,, -„i .. ,, i.' ', ' ..i „,,., ...,.........,.,........u.... ... x..... ....•. .. ........ ...•.. .,,... ., ,., .,i.,....,,. urn.. .•.•.....•,•, i.r..r ,...rli I .,., . ,L,.l..u,.»,k .. .. „xJ ,..,.......K„u,..-Y•....._ '7.,.,-,..» ........... ..r .+....M.w.....«.n., ...:l...L.........I'\.+-.1+-...,t., .............a...u.M,._R...i,,.,.u..... ....,...,1,._.-..«-.W 1.«...:,,.- -....l...r.Na..i,... n.i'....r..., 1t page DRB Minutes 5/11/76 .°'r. the sine building materials as used in the parent building would also be used in the addition. 2. Board Discussion. and Action o Olson moved and Hammes second to approve the . ,. architectural design as submitted. . o Motion approved by unanimous voice vote. 5.5 Review of a Proposed Amendment to Approve Plans for a 50 Unit Apartment Building at SW Scholls Perry Rd. at Spring- wood Dr. in the Englewood Planned Development, deleting Tennis Courts and Reconstructing the Old Water Tower. Y r r A. Staff Report: oral report given by Bolen who summarized past or previous approval. -B. Applicant's Presentation. 2, 0 Mr. J. B. Bishop, architect for the project, slated that since the initial Boar.d approval', his rcompany _ - had been approached by Wash. Co Historical Society in an attempt to p - preserve the existing cad water tower on the site. Their findings were that structurally the water tower was sound and that it could be used for pool equipment storage, a laundro- mat or a small meeting room. If both the water tower and the swimming pool were maintained, there would not be enough room for the tennis courts and their request is that the requirement of the tennis courts be eliminated; Also the swimming pool would need to be relocated. Mr. Bishop submitted a site plan showing the proposed changes. p �. gl p �. o Staff questioned the provision being made for garden area and, although the idea is to be applauded, if not utilized, the potential !for this site to be turned into a children's play area should be invests gated or should be provided for. If the garden 'area « is not used, it should be planted in sod. C. Staff Recommendation: Approval of the changes and, if the garden area doesn't Work out, it be planted in • sod. If the garden, area is provided, it be so identified. A 10 ft. easement along Scholls Ferry Rd. be Provided. and Action Discussion ; D. Boa�ld' r I i If page 7 { 1' B]R:B Minut 5/11/76 a: o Cook °'moved and Gcsldbach second to approve; the site "' plan with a final plan being submitted to staff for approval showing the changes of deleting the tennis courts, relocating the pool and delineation of the . garden area, plus a 10 ft, easement be provided along 1 Scholls Ferry Rd. • r o Motior approved by unanimous, voice vote. i 6. OTHER BUSINESS G' : Bolen stated that since the,, agenda had been sent out, staff . had been approached by Gevurtz Furniture Co. to add this item to the agenda. S�La.ff. f`� . A. Staff Report: Oral staff report given by Bolen. r B. Applicant's Presentation Mr. Bob Pershing of. Oregon Sign Co; showed exhibits of locations and types of signs thawou.ld like to have on the site. ... � McMonagle stated that he felt the purpose of a sign was to identify the location and not to distract from drivers ' a ttention along the freeway and that the signing program, as proposed, could be too large, w Hammes stated that he didn't feel the sign along the freeway was out of proportion and he would prefer to see option "Bti along the freeway with a 2 ' to 3' high planted berm to cut down the visual inpact of the height of the sign. G oldbach stated that either option i1 fi, o or fi f along the freeway could be provided, but that in.s°aead it be at the scale shown for option !ICI'. •M McMonag le concurred with G old a ch s recomm endation and asked that a 6 ft. high la.ndscap,ea berm be provided. Cook concurred. C. Board Discussion and Action o Hammes moved and Cook second that an adequate landscape mound be provided under option ' B"; that the location of the freeway sin be moved to its original location 1 g as shown on the site plan; that the landscaping be sub- mitted for final staff approval o Motion approved by unanimous voice vote. i`I1 ADJOURNMENT: Meeting adjourned at about 8:40 p.m. n f i i , I i % q• . . g s � 1.,[�. , 1 I f •'ti 1 1 '4 1 , I 1 A I it ,, '' I,: ',,!!M. l z'o : 23 1976 'W 1 ' 9l i B4/,W'MrNK.l,�Ty IIM Krause', JL „ , 1M"4 H 1 1 Landscape ,, 12 40 'Co^ l Rc•1., ' ' • 1 rb.'y e d 1 • . 11 �ss.s,0' . . and Krause* 1 ' 10 so be 'advised, hat wo are .h, receipt oC oww is dsoapo plan fog ° ` ' - the evurtZ FuX ittro, project on SW 'Bonita: d' The Tigard Design ' . • . f Review Board a proved this pro jor:b on July 22, l97 , with the con . chi . t a ' _� scape pleat be'' submitted' for r by '.� s��.oxx ��.�; �c��`��,� d. lz�,nt� � a�� a�a�, ' the p a in 1dopa tment .s aff, I have reviewed your submitted play ' , aan find,'d it pta to 0 with the xception„ that 'a five foot :sidewal , . . be provided, to the western. property line in place of the 2 foot, ',Sidewalk shown on the ubm �tted ply, and'that the.. area of' exi tin . trees 1('an abandoned orchard), be cleaned up o' 'In, addition p I would . ' ' ' -. ' ' 'appreciate e it %L ou would' advise your client that any signing o ' ' ' ' . ![ this business must be .submitted.' to the- Design' Review, Board for their . ', ' approvals 'I ' ould sug est, ra.at this be done as soon as possible in or4 'that . approved si .in ; pla1n wild ` to to the owner.,a " � ' will,be �L:a r ?lease do tot hesitate to contact this office at 639-4171, 1 you' need additional information or' assist ce d ' ' ', ' ' ' , ' ' ,Sincerely ., ,, 1 1 ' Dick 3olen ' D8 1 cot 'Ti'm Clar. ii ' oter ,Landscape 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 1 I l 1 . 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . ,,.. .. ..... . • • beighley I krausepc landscape architects consulting 12840 northwest Cornell roads portland, oregon 97229 « 503 643-4796 °'A transmittal TO: City of Tigard project: Gevurtz P.O.; Box 23557 issued: 3/15/76 e Tigard, Oregon n 97223' by: Hal Beighley ATTN. Mr. Jim Powell re: Landscape s c a pe & irrigation • WE ARE FORWARDING: Cenclosed ❑ under separate cover,via r ❑ shop drawings L prints ❑ addendum no. ❑ specifications r ❑ copy of letter �❑ change order 0 *Copies date no. description tion .. 1 2/76 1 Planting Plan � . • 1 2/76 2 Irrigation Plan r Vf r • if material received is not as listed above, please notify us at once { THESE ARE TRANSMITTE,D AS CHECKED BELOW: o for ► oval 0 approved as submitted L7 resubmit copies for r afapr approval N for your use ❑ approved as noted ❑ submit copies for distribution N as requested ❑'returned for corrections ❑ returner cbrrected prints O for review and comment ❑ Q . " REMAlRKS. Please find erxdlosed two (2) sets of Planting and Irrigation plans for review comment. These 'plans are submitted as part of your rev arid.' o�r� tent. '�h r earlier request to Architects. • Yoe i � t •L,o t�.e ,�rcY7.�. r I COPIES TO: r ..r • • ,n .,,,.»..wim»...:.:.�1..:a.-„i.-.as..,...a 1.,a..,;..,.,�—..,..:wxl« a.4....,, • :...,.iw.s.,-u:,.�..,...-•....,.,s.....i,_. -... .»;.a-.»a......,....,,.,k.nu..,:_,,,+s..»_�.�.....�u',.»...w_...,.,ku,lu.d.vtl.....,.,_,,.-..4..,...«.n.,•Ate-„M ..,..i,'r,..r.,.a...L...�i.r, .«.+..1,-',ui,. .c.«._�,,.te.�+w ...,>t.c_..,�u.ew...l,..:.,h.«a:wr_,.�,.i,w�...............-.....•. -,.0 ta,' X , , . I I I • I ri • 4 r b4 i• at+. ”, 7 ,r iv"1n1'li',rit rrtl0l.' ,r,:1 af Ant .�f,(SIr% r�r�l.•'y' #3 r1�11 ,t,,1 ',t'y.1. r '•! fir t t�r1+1 1 _ ` en,rr .,� ∎, a N +(a ! ,x. r" M1 ek1 1 ,•r1 / r I Jtl t 1, I.. ��„f,',..,',.•10�r:�J1 fi fr ,+`I,��7�,',..4��i�M I. cl 1.`:t,rCYlfl 34y + ^41t'a x I Yrt 4.:■�i i `J '�i r.'''''� l;,',1'...,..'Xf� t�r 0 I' V'14�Xtlt},+tilt t v kM+rJ r ?I'k,` I, 1}t„+44 11 fly1/4 7: 41., l(h�,''l ti,",' f,is 1” � , a47,1, r'(,-1� '1t1l,If! 4[ t 1111+'„l :1 fq4 t p,1:;,,,':t'1,,. ,•.rlYref.� l. 1;',,';',...4,'1",!'i,., !�k1 51,'-,, ",, E w} .:. r S J 7,=;r ra L y 1, ii ,171 r Y,.„,„1 l'_„ 1, !` ,1 ;r., } fl1 1 r c r it .:"!'',1,,,..'1,'„'',,,,‘( i'di'",'!{'i 1 t " 16 F �,11 I,'Y 1.!J Y „'11",,r I. .', i l 4 S1! , t 1.J ' lr l.'MYI •v la �'r r'•a ,7,1 I v 5 1 rtl{ , Yl r 1 .Y U" , r 1t t..�a M�fY., M liO f�l r { IJ vl� I , J 1W,C: d 4f1� J�1'1 , , REG IF f �A� 101'1' •s r, 2701`B B 114th AVENUE...F?CJI 6p'X,421b6 1�P- -1'L r l I C� phlof�Y qf r'��'�4L I''3 j , I I ;` , ebb ar hirig I ' ' '�j a I 'Y, . 1 A % 1 , r I I , , • • I i I •� r/ r I v 1 Y ■ Id {4 r/ 4 i Y / • \ , '' 11 ;a,r.wl. '�f1l�,,•.- " . ... «w�..w r.:. F... n, d I' r ��,- g i ' zi d,J Y // r • r ...< ' r « 0 ' ,?4 St • • VI AerKd1%.M1 r.........."'°44mea+mrN..........0.111,..1a"4rpudiga.1 d . . 4 F ,. il � f" ` �M /.Y volt, . , w . w, ;'' d ` , } n a ht N. � I CI il . rNM..b.?aM J♦w+ra.wYw'r"'w" uw ..+F..rww -wa+ „,... ) ",,,, . .- 1 `); F�'— . 4 1 . �. ( . • ■F W t { . i ! i ry1�1111 ,. , Nt al.�r/ 11. t♦. , if LO1 ”''S>'- k) I .' 1 4 y�u '�r tv !,.Y nr r' w+1rY4 i� , J 3 ' \i ( k.. 4r' y !W N,w..y i....w�r-.... +L.... ....... ,;,;.�..,.� 4'Y 4M''4�'000 III C � �)r.,.. 1.....� �,��,. � �7 .... w '7..Ir .p... 0 s , .r.vslic. . • " •,Nw..1YA,.,,Y.,,aevj Y.,.;1 :✓", p e v 4� f' *. "Ns,i "rr,"r y.W»,'' w�,r„w•'M.,�r,;,,u,,.Y W{,M •"''" ? yY� f',+ ✓` W.WwY,y"�°''«t^q ,, '�; ., ■i i 'tl 4 y/ ♦ p , iy/1 s. ` r „,,..,,,‘..1...11\ � a 4 y I a” N. 4,w�� o �'{}yrr� a,w.-� +:+M✓ �IF. 4'0.04' y' ti 1 Y .„)R k n "� pp 1 " p, ' .nY,.,.Y I 3.' I'd .. r +4 4 e1. 'mow 1 + 1, �'WN x , is , �' a''Y Ir +Y r}, Ir r i I •' / 1 ( !' , . '' I )1 14,! 1 ' i