Loading...
SDR16-75 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. i, '' 0 ; d 1 1 October 3* 197 Commerce Park 7:1.00 SW Hampton Street � . `, Suite 110 Tigard, OR 97223 a . ' Attn: 11130 Barbara Bushnell Ono w Additional Parking • . Dear Ms. T3t1)shzi 1T I apologize for the da1m, in responding to you since our meeting on September o 6 197{. 0 Sin'e that day x: have been re et.rching solutions to your p roblem of insufficient 1 •' ' ..• g parking.. I needed to know rh oWr^ sire of SW Hampton was not required to be improved to the Cit l s collector street standard at the time D deva"iopment d e, I also needed an ,dea as to a standard compact ,ehtele part rn$ space width and depth. The conclusion of the research are as follows: ",r ► SW pt has been identified by nthe St .t t Ui hway Department • to be realigned to the north around the oast side of the officeI, t w° building on the north side of SW Taaripte ; and a .i. ,�. with th Efl G�, nza ;. 6 out to SW 72nd. Therefore* any major improvement*nt on your r t i i' : of ;�� �. SW Hampton will be altered in the near fut .red .Na' • 0 Secondly* I contacted the City of Portland and tho City of feaveTt en "4, for their standard compact car parking a aec requirement and founn out that neigher city has a standard. However* the City of Tigar ,'I . till accept a site plan amandmeat for a revised parking plan Lu your complex With 000A compact ears alpacas ,. The width and depth of the spaces are open to your engineers proposal. you acre also required to shorten the landscape parking islands to avoid; obstruction`and , ` p p ' � propose. parking�, t �� •,�'�'� SW x��� t��11`1 ����e to� the island. You �xa• a�©���e ;�c��xe ark, x� ���,t1x asphalt . if you ' Lah � • . l • An y change on SW Hampton ���� require approval by the `Ub1i' Works Department.��nt� If I can be of any further assistance please ectnt .ct ute at 63941714 , . MS/PJ , L Ken Selby* Asso ,a.t: c e Planner cc: FI'VF. 16-,75 file i it4,414141411.YiI�t- 4 ';„ k f • * . ''..'',/',;(,.. ''.ill . \\ /.• \c, i • '/i.‘972C.,,, ' ' f . r 1. ib 6,--A---ii-t-4-4- (3--t4-4,1A-L--c/( 1. . ........_,_ ,), i 1 , t 1,.• : ., . . ..,- , , \ ' (......3)..- --"-.' II ' •■ 1`.-' ! F r„..... . , .., .z_4 .z, 32,,,t_os .,?1,,, , . . . . , .. , r . s---irs,f;,,e..4i..., 1 , •. .. tr., . c 1 , . i, ,. , . 1 ,.. . ...... 1 , , 1 . , . 1 . ,,. 1 107/6,..) .., e/ A , "' !J • k 6 .2O n., ' I t J � s'-211 �S J G y J 1 . r r 1 • 1 ".„2.4.4., .5-e: r4 1 I ': . ''' r 1 PA-7'1'6 'f''k1s4 '(** /2) . {M . ' eee_^,-.1,6! ;)'d1S4-. ,e,,t.)4 ' ■, t. ...,, ,p#'1,0.,I I ,/I ll i e.. Zr.3,.&IL 1 1 1 r 1 •ve: 3 -6 1 et,(4 4 ' ,,L ,,,, , ,,,,k ,,,, , Y / ,.., i 1 I k,,,, , 1 1 r I' t I 1 i 1 N a ,A x „ ,k . 1. I 1 I 1 r 4 "4;, • j`,,,.,' 6.1 c.,145%.64e'l-1 66-e-I-4.--- , " 6err,,(2.A._. et.A.-R-d1/4-4. c.:-....v....i..›..c..,44-- , 1 ..-. . :' S-'/A-(41-,....e.,,,, - :4. (4,-e.,14) • a ,w...af /4:5 4� .W«f ��1°" ✓ - A11.6 ,f ei-df-e— l'irt...0,/..,1-4 k.-A-it.4t.41t.--e , . . , ‘ 3‘— /i/ Z • . 4 ' 0..il I, . n' i', ? : i 1. 1/tet, r "N � • • ' , . -,e..0 4('' 41 1 ve)--61./ 5-e■ kl‘--?--"2-011--9-rit'4 y.y.1 f♦ i • "_ / '- -. ' ' : ...1.4 , yam', p e.G�_ -e.,t..4 , 4 ,.. �Ir!/'411-4,1 eiLd...e4,4. 'fit° 1' --e.)-6°-4e-7/ ^'e '°-4e 5"k 11-C: -- f " L, .« „A1*--. 1 ,j.f..4.-.4...-, o �� "f,,y, -����Ew�"1” - f' �' r• `w(� cam. . I 1 „ { yy' ; 4:. a, e i I a. 1 , • • • • • c , cr August 8; 197 .aA WQ Larkin Hall l , Lincoln Property Company 7100 S. W, Hampton . Y Suite 110 Tigard o Oregon 97223 Reference: Pie No 2DR 16-75 (Lincoln Properties Sign) Dear Mr, Hall: Please be advised that the Tigard Site Development and Architectural Design Review 8card, at their July 220 19750 meeting reviewed the location and design of your project identification sign at 72nd and Hampton and your Dequest was approved, lease do not hesitate to contact this office at 639-4171 if we can be of additional assistance. Sincerely; fix+ CITY Off' TIGARD n ■ Jerald M,, Powell Assoop AX Associate Planner OVIPtps I � I ti it �....:.. .. .......„., .,,..........,...., ,. ..,.., .,,..,.,..,,.-,.... .,,,,.. ,».,,., „., ,.., ,, ...h;. ., �,. ,. ,.„ � .,i, .,4, ,• .,�, ., V , • w ' ♦. KI Y . ...w....-J!,«�.,._ ..3,«..J......4. »...ww:.JL: «.,. ._l,_ ..w,....,. .x.a.a... „...,.,. ,«v...,1+.wWa.w.,x......4,,....f.r..........w..xv..a..>':a.._..,_F.l:..'n:L, , ..3J..I..c.4o-�.>u.-�..,'.P...,..,.,J:.1+.,—�.+-MM•w. ..r.+.,.1.,+,�ti.lL4 F: 1,�.. .+.0 u.M W . 4.r. ..lIA uw...a , O. •a«„x .usl. .tl_iX.Lr.'�,..K.::1at.p,.YaS,' Staff Report Tigard Site Development Plan & Architectural Design Review Board ” ' July 22, l9?5 Agenda Item 4.2 • SDR 16-75 Sign I �� n Review of a proposed project si gn at SW 72nd and Hampton r Staff Findings a' 1. ' Location'' proposed is at the 'intersection of 72nd ana--9, zik recommended Design " Hunziker as by the Desi Review Board. . 2. Desi gn is for a 30 square foot sig n a ground mounted. , 1 ZOA 2-75, authorizing this requested action has been 3.' 75 g q 9 passed by Tigard City Council and is now effective. " Recommendation Approval . l P 0 r I i I �r f .L 4 , 1. f� tI ,,,, M N- .•,.y.,.,.,,..,rn�nHa4.�a�r4ux..r..,.^.m,7 , �1 ti r i 1 ...n ,... .,... ,... .,a....,,.,,._,.,,.1_,...„_,,.I4..,.,...haU.....•..ro,.......,•_.,.. is„».',1.,,.t. .. ..__,_.,.., ....,•..._a.,......1,A.t....ri 4:...-,.:A..:..,.,..1,•.,. ..«.+.a.,... y.`...••..i...:L..1.. ,..a.._..,...eu A,a..,. , nyor.... ,...,t MINUTES Tigard Site Development and Architectural Design Review Board . July 22, 1975 4 5:00 p.m. - Tigard City Hell 12420 S. W. Main St. , Tigard, Oregon • 1. CALL TO ORDER:• Chairman McMonagle called the meeting to order at 5:15 p.m. • 2. ROLL CALL: , Members present:ent. Cook Cook, Hamme s, McMonagle, Olson, Wakem; staff: Powell, Bolen and Laws 3. MINUTES The minutes of the June 10, 1975, June 24, 1975, and July 8, 1975, meetings were approved as submitted. n 4. PROJECT REVIEWS 4.�.. SD 23-75 (Gevurtz Furniture) . SDR 3-75 (Levu F'ur , • A request for site design and ar hitectural review of a proposed furniture warehouse and showroom at 15 and Bonita Rd.'4 + • A. Site Design Review , • 1. Staff Report: read by Powell with recommendation.' to provide irrigation and landscaping , on all sides of building and to pro- ' ;_. vide a hard surfaced access to rear loading dock. 2. Applicant Presentation: Gary Michaels of. Michaels, ' Mann and Lakeman, presented slide' graphics and additional information concerning the project. {, 3. Board Discussion and Action o Discussion of the proposed site design centered • . primarily on access drives and need for paved l ,' access to the loading and maneuvering area at the rear of the building o Discus.sio n of sign location b.y Cook and McMona gle yielded agreement that the locations } •. proposed were reasonable.., r I � o . •Moti on to approv e (Cook) subject to provision ovsion of an irrigation plan and details of landscape plan for staffs approval. o Seconded (Hammes) o Motion approved unanimously. • a . r JJ I l'! • r B. Architectural Design Review . o General Discussion of building design centered on . the shielding of rooftop mechanicals and the surface textures to be applied on two sides of the building. Some concern was shown by the Board • for the finish of the sides not shown as broomed. o The Board further discussed the topic of sign design . ` concluding that actual design of the signs should be ' `{ • resubmitted for their approval. • o Motion to approve (Cook) subject to submission of •�. • actual graphics of the sign design. +4 o Seconded (Waken) " ` o Approved unanimously. 4.2 SDR 16-75 (La.r..oln Properties Sign) b • 1 A request fc' •'iew of the location and design of a project . • identificy t . '.gn at 72nd and Hampton" �' ' A. Staff Re.�., read by Powell y B. Applicant Presentation: Mr. Ron May (Gilley Co. ) representing Lincoln Properties, testified that the design now presented was a result of pre- vious comments rr:r:de by the l° Board and that he felt it satisfied , criteria they had applied. I/". C. Board Discussion and Action o . The Board briefly discussed the sign and its location. IF • 1 o Motion to approve (Olson) . • o Seconded (Hammes) . Hammes . o Moti.on carried unanimously. 5. OTHER BUSINESS . ` ' 5.1 Larry Bissett presented a model of the proposed Oregon Bank ,r r Building and a re vise d landscape plan to satisfy requirements ,' a of the Board's previous approval (Si D 2-75) It was also , pointed out that an tn.forseen problem with the original survey had resulted in a need to redraw the site plan with the '.' resultant loss of parking space. Bissett's solution to 1. . the problem had been designation of 4 compact parking • ' . spaces in place of 4 regular spaces. , r jj • SDR Minutes -- July 22, 197 - page rwcnrrdw--,'�FUe i .... ...,.......•....�..,.. .,,.-,.«,.. ...., z ...r..,.a .•.— .,_...._ ,,, ..,..r ..-'G...•,.-r«,.,,....w..., .r._i'„<,... ....._.a4..N:.....+.w.:.w.-..,.,..._..r.M, ..r...a..•tiww..,..,.v..4Y«:4a ,r, .,e.....-......r.a,,«,4.,.,..,d.r....v..,.c mew.,. ...„.a,r+.«r, ruw....,r..waa.,.r...,.s ku.•. - r. r • I o Staff pointed out that, at the time of the original , Design Review Board meeting, the applicant had been . ;. LL` unsure of the type of materials he would use. o' The applicant said that at this time they had worked • pp ,+ out the technical difficulties in using "slump block” L , and that the building would be as had been originally shown to the Board. I. o Bissett pointed out the addition of street trees on r Pacific H i hwa o The Board notes its approval of the concept of street ' tree planting and asked staff to pursue obtaining approval by the State Highway Division. I'; 0 General discussion of other. aspects of the plan followed. r.. o Motion to approve as submitted (Cook) as an amendment to , the earlier Design Review Board approval, requesting . w staff to recommend approval of the street tree theme �,.. • to the State Highway Dept. •"„ o Seconded (Wakem) o. Motion carried unanimously. f. ti 5.2 Extension of a previously approved parking lot for Assembly of God Church on SW Gaarde. A. Staff Report 1 Due to the character of this request for review of an extension of an existing project, no new, site design r' review was being required and that due to the time constraints on staff and the limited time available for review of this project, no, staff report had been providedb i o S taf f described its concerns with the proposed 0 project which were: 1. Scale of the shade trees was unspecified. Staff • ° feels e trees provided in the. landscape islands ought r to be of sufficient size to shade ' r. a good portion of the parking lot and break up 'I , " the expanSe of unshaded asphalt. 2, The screening provided on the Gaarde St, side of the parking lot appears insufficient. ,0 over in the area 3 r� Ground. cover� snot planted with major o- shrubs is 'specified on the plan by note. Staff requests that a planting interval sufficient } DRB Minute s - truly 22 1975 Page e 3 , t ( • +, i \ ,„ ,,....,...,,.., ,.-.,., .,;t.., a,.i,..,.<„,..,,.m.,_ ......»,,., ,.,.,._ ...,., , _ ,.._.,,,,.,._.. ..., ,..__'.._ ,,,.,....,.,n,,.._«.., _,..,,,,.,+.,_,,,,..a.±,In,.,,za.w,.v..,:.a.G.,.„.d;a.,..u.:».„,,,r»..,,..,,.1>G_r..,.,<..,.a,,. .m+....,•a..., ...,. �. • to ensure ground coverage and to ensure survival of the planting be agreed upon. 4. The site plan does not show this project's r, relationship to the existing access to the church and the circulation pattern is therefore „ unknown. , , 5 The long row of diagonal spaces nearest Gaarde , St.should be broken up with at least 2 land- • soaped islands such that no more than 6 or 7 t , ' spaces would be In any one unbroken row. • for 1 - of the parking lot, s eakiri for B. Mr. Olson, designer p g � p g • the church, said that ground cover in the form of ivy and Oregon grape would be prov5,ded and that he felt that planting, intervals° and so forth could be arrived at with staff. He also said that it was his intent I` that large shade trees such as Norway maple be pro- vided in the parking areas. Mr. Olson indicated that t of the Dept. of Environmental Quality, at the request p ' they had contacted Tri- Met, who had in turn voiced interest in the, use of the parking area for a park ' p � and ride station during the week. C. Staff Recommendation • Staff recommended that: ” provided in those 'are areas not t 1. Grol,�.n.d cover be r � P , covered by shrub plantings, particularly along banks adjacent fences. Y " , w 2. That arborvitae or a similar evergreen screening planting be provided on Gaarde to screen the parking lot. I I 3. That an irrigation system be provided. 4. That parking $pace8 1 thru 7 be revised to 'allow adequate. back out 5. The two landscaped islands, 6 sp aces apart, be • shown on the south side on the side of the parking lot nearest Gaarde.I St. Those landscape islands .'' and the central landscape islands to be provided with 6 or 7 structural shade trees placed in a random pattern:' D. Board biscussion and Action. staff o oI Olson moved to approve per ,staff recommendations w it h r exception of item 5 and adding an the on item to require that requested by staff be tha the � or 7 shade trees I i tt ,:ig`•�� „' 1.AR.n Minutes W July 22, 1975 - page 4 • 1 r 1. r • ry f n _... ...,li.,.....u�.. _, a�.,,....,��F.u.,._ ...m.,... ,ri.,,«. �r,'r��....,.:.�w...:..�.�.. .,.,n,:l,.,....,, .,.«.....-i.._,�..-�.....�...aa+i..�.,«_.,..il«F�,,.......t,:,...i,w�a,,.,..-,,..,,,..,.�,.,w,SSA'+;wM.�„....,..4..:.�{}„',.,, ...« �• ..x .ia",w+aw.+.c placed within the parking islands shown. o Seconded (Hammes) o Motion carried unanimously . 5.3 Staff possed out copies of a memorandum suggesting criteria for design review of signs in commercial zones. (See exhibit attached) . No discussion of this item was requested at this t :n,e rather the board was asked by staff to look the suggested criteria over for discussion at the next Board meeting. I I 6. ADJOURNMENT: 6:30 • v • • � 1 I AII 4 c t PAD Minutes _ � ��y �2 0 1975 5 . page 5 ..., �..... .,.., �i4 ,.. I 1t.Iw.+u.x.utdbJi�..bKumvsx+, r���,�,�} •, e q • ' A • I I , �. FIA„. . .9 w wwM,_,., y..,... •,_ wry . w.A . k'. • • July 18, 1975 City of Tigard P 0. Box 23557 12420 0 Sa W. Main Tigard, Oregon 97223 Attention: Mr. Jerald Powell, Assoc. AIP » • • Associate Planner Dear Jerry: Lincoln Property Company would like to request that the attached layout for the proposed Lincolnwood Office Park project sign appear before the Design Review Board for approval on. July 29, 1975. I realize that it is a bit late to get on the docket for the review meeting, but I feel that we should s be given some special consideration due to the fact ' that We initiated this proposal almost eight months ago and have yet to arrive at a final decision regarding the approval of our sign. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. � . { i • Regards, LINCOLN ROPERTy CO PANY 0f W. Larkin Hall WLH:bl attachment: 1 (I � NNNN�N�'CNx PlNtidvorY r gOT PON 71bo wHAnOro �T�t �U17G 71ta�fab, �pEC�oN J722a �i�=b Caa; ?bd- 2d��do I, I'. • , •�1 I I 1 ' 'FIB. M.,.M... ...«.. .,.................. .. ..w..:..m,,....,_,.,._......1.1....,.x.::L......-..:.,:.'..N.....:. ,.. ....,...d.aw«,A :,i,.... ...,..,. ..a.4..,, a P 1 15 • AGENDA Tigard Site Development and Architectural Design Review Board Jun., 10, 1975 4.30 p.m. H Twality Junior High School- Lecture Room 14650 S. W. 97th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon • 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: May 27, 1975 4. PROJECT REVIEW 4 l SDR 13-75 3-7 5 (wi 1 ow b r oo ke Apartments Tualatin in �D Development ;• n r A request review for eview of a fifty-seven unit apartment, development . . on SW Summerf,ield Drive, west of 109th Avenue in the Summerfield nmerfield Planned Development. A. Staff Report B. Applicant's Presentation C. Public Testimony D. Board Discussion and Action 4,2 SDR 15-75 (Scott Planned Development) A request for review of a 14 dwelling unit duplex planned development on the west side of SW 98th, south of Greenburg .Rd., A. Staff Report B. Applicant's Presentation C. Public Testimony D. Board Discussion and Action • 4.3 SDR 16--75 (Lincoln Properties Sign) A request for review of the design, and location of a free-standing sign at ,Lincolnwood Office Park, SW 72nd and Hampton Street. A. Staff Report B. Applicant 's Presentation C. Public Testimony • D. Board Discussion and Action • • P . 1 ' yr Ve 4 ,r — ',_.,.,. nv u• a....,..�¢..,. n :u.. a .. u 1 ,.., ,, ......._U,n..• .... t..r is'r.u;s✓:,. c•_ ..oa.ti • r - MINUTES Tigard Site Development Plan & Architectural Design Review Board • June 10, 1975 • Twality Junior High School - Lecture Room 14650 SW 97th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon • 1. CALL TO ORDER: Wakem called the Board to order at 5:50 p.m. in A• the absence of Chairman Bartel. CALL: r, 2. ROLL C Members present were Cook and Wakem; alternates: Mann, Kelting 3. MINUTES Minutes of May 27, 1971, were approved as read. ' • . • COMMUNICATIONS:4 o Bartel, McMonagle, and Cook presented a letter, attached hereto, " and made a part hereof, officially resigning from the Design f Review Board and presenting their reasons for resignation. ." Cook presented a letter in addition, subscribing to the joint resignation, but deferring the time of his resignation until such time , as Board member Hammes was able to attend the meeting. 2 5. ,PROJECT RLVIEW ' 5.1 SDR 13---75 (Willowbrooke Apartments * Tualatin Development Co. ) :, • A request for review of a 57 unit apartment development on SW Summerf ield Drive, west of 109th Avenue, in the Surnmerfield Planned Development. A. Staff Report o Staff report (attached) was read by Powell as amended to reflect submission of density data o Staff recommendation was for approval on conditions that: 1. Additional major scale landscape elements such • as structural shade trees and/or large conifers in appropriate places. 2. Pedestrian access to apartments be directly from , parking areas. y aprons to pu treet be �. 3. Standard. drivewa a r blip s u.tilizedA p be e to • 4. Parkin g spaces b perpendicular endicular center line of access drive , • ,......,............. ....... . ,.... ,,,.,... . «.__,_..,,,,,. __..,.. ....,». , ....,r»:Ji.,.»:t.M.,...�.,..i-..,,,,,....._.,,,.µ.....__....,..,,,......,,. .,,t»,,,u.v,_,.,i.,....we..w..m...,.,.i,.i,.....,.......tM,w_ ......,,..,,.....,..,....,x..._,_.. _..,..a.vw.,u.v. ,.,..N_w._,a.,:.,s.,.:a.:a,+ ,t at 10 n. • Presen B. Applicant's Tualatin Development Co presented the plans for Willow- brooke Apartments. Mr. Adams explained the density corn- . putation and showed conformance with previous approvals by the City. C. Public Testimony No othern.�'.were present to testify. D, Board Discussion and Action o The Board discussed the problems seen by staff and, • staff recommendations included in the staff report , with applicant. o Applicant agreed to work out implementation of staff D recommendations #1 and #4 voluntarily. o Board and applicant worked out a solution to the driveway apron problem utilizing a modified sta,ndard apron» o Motion for approval (Mann) as submitted, but recom mending realignment of pedestrian accesses to apart- ments and recommending large tree plantings adjacent to the apartments as recommended by staff. o Seconded (Kelting) o Motion carried E. Architectural Review o Motion (Kelting) for approval. o Motion died for lack of a second. o Motion (Cook) f dr approval on conditions that appli- cant submit renderings or elevations of carports to staff for their approval to ensure that car ports are compatible in design with apartment buildings, and on ,condition that applicant pay particular, attention to breaking the linearity of buildings with • trees as suggested in the site plan review. Mr. Hammes, Board member, arrived and Cook excused himself. (Scott Planned Development) 5 5 75 p I I request for review of a 14 duplex la d d re oo th.e west side ofeSWl98th �Isothof planned Rd. rev development on , • A. Staff Report Staff report was read by Powell with recommendation for approval subject to conditions 1 through 5 o staff roport* a . 4 • i I B. Applicant's Presentation Mr. Scott appeared on his own behalf and described the project' and what he was attempting to do with it C. Public Testimony No one appeared D. Board Discussion and Action o o Discussion of landscape plan, particularly centered ! on maintenance of common areas and necessity for„ sprinkler irrigation. o Discussion of foundation plantings and screening for outside living areas dwelt on the , desirability of maintaining a constant theme and "easy care" materials. o Motion for approval (Kelting) subject to staff recom- mendations except that sprinkler irrigation system , need only be provided in common landscaped areas adjacent to the entry and in the center islands. • E. Architectural Design Review o Discussion of roof and siding materials and colors showed no consensus. o Motion for approval (I-ammes) subject to actual materials '` ' and colors being submitted to staff by applicant before a building permit be issued. o Seconded (Kelting) o Motion carried 5.3 SIR 15-75 (Lincoln Properties - sign) A request for review of the design n and location of a free- . g' standing sign at Lincolnwood' Office Park, SW 72nd and Hampton St. A. Staff Report Staff report was read by Powell with recommendation for ' approval of a 32 sq. ft. sign, relocated to a more appropriate location. B. Applicant 's Presentation Mr. John Flattery from Lincoln Properties Co identified the problem that the applicant was having, and described the sign that they desired, on their project, • o 1 • • C. Public Testimony No one. appeared. D. Board Discussion and Action o Acting Chairman Wakem briefly outlined the history of this project in front of the Planning Commission. Said he felt that signing identification of the pro- ject was necessary and reasonable, that the problem that the Design Review Board had related to the lo- cation -- cation ,and, the mass the sign a nd said he was con- , cerned that the sign appeared designed to advertise the. project rather than to direct people to it. ° o Kelting said he liked the sign but was concerned about the "rider" signs shown attached. o Applicant asked what the Board would consider. o Board indicated a preference for a location away from the freeway, perhaps at 72nd and Hampton, and a sign that omitted the real estate company logo and/or other advertisin g messages. g o Wakem asked staff if specific, criteria for evaluating signs would be soon available to the. Design Review Board. o Staff indicated it would be o Mr. Flatery asked the, Board if the consensus was that the sign as presented was not acceptable. said that the sign as view o Wakem, for the Board, s g n a re item was not really yet before them, that in this conference situation the Board felt obligated to advise the applicant as to its preferences, not as to whether a particular design was acceptable to r them. y said would return, a . o Mr. Flattery he wou at later date ,for an approval. 6. OTHER' BUSINESS: None 7. ADS OURNME�'I. 7:45 p.m. lkI I 41 • _.,_.,„............:::n.:a.,:.d•...:.;H,...,.....,, -r..�...»....«;i.,...,..,,.5_._.w4...,._.-«..„„,..w'a. ...wa.rn,N..;�-.M.,.,...i ,,„m.,.,....4,,- ._.µ.,...:..,:.,...a-: ..a,«.s,„ ..._...i...,...,µ,.k,..-.,..... ,.,..,, ,.».,. ....r .M...r a;it_,«,..N.l,..:;..,w?;_.6L'.»4m„M,.,u 7- • • • . Staff Report Tigard Site Development Plan and Architectural Design Review Board June 10, 1975 Twality Jr. High School 14650 S.W. 97th Ave. Tigard, Oregon Agenda Item SDR 16-75 Applicant is Lincolnwood Office Park sign Co.Lincoln Properties La.n h erties C P p Applicants �e9u_e t' .. Review of a proposed 'sign location and design per proposed zoning ordinance amendment putting design and location of certain signs in the Commercial-Professional zone under the purview of the Tigard' Site Development Plan & Architectural Design Review Board. Staff Findlngs 1. The ordinance effectuating this reva.eu functran •of the Design Review Board (ZOA 2 -75) has been approved and recommended by the Planning Commission to the City Council, but will not be heard by the Council until June 23, 1975 2. Lincoln Prope rties i s asking that review, be done at this time in anticipation of the Councils action recognizing that no approval may be given until such time as authorized by Council. that this is a 42 square 3. Lincoln Properties contends c n n h q foot sign. Tigard Code states that a "sign's is the face of the sign as well as its structure--implying they are ' visual surface would be computed inseparable and '.the. va.sU f P P not the "message area". Staff finds the area of the • • r proposed sign to be 100 square feet 2.111 the two 16 square feet "hider" signs (total as shown then equals . 132 square feet) 5e Real Estate signs i n the C-P zone may not exceed 12 square feet in area "Rider”6.. Rider" si ns are not allowed. I ; ( ' r..,..0 .......Y... .,.,•a...l.-,...._.,.._. ,,..,-...,....M»,_.a,.,.1...r.�..,.i.'.ji..a,.,,'_...».......m_...,...M.» ,,..,.,,.._.-....r..i,-,..«,.l'.,,....,,..M,.,;L........,...,.,.Y—, ,.r..-,...,,.,..,.0.:,Y,.. 'd,.,.....,:.,k„ rr?_...'.:r,,.....,..,•,Y..,.Meti,.:+in.r'..M.i..:.,;..rs",...', :.:«' • 7. The proposed sign is to be loc{,'ted adjacent a freeway off-ramp, in approximately the location a "For Lease" sign is presently located. The appropriateness of the distance the sign is located back from the traffic 1, nearest the sign is a concern of staff with respect to this project, as the sign, to be effective and not , be a nuisance, must have a wide field of view. 8. Staff feels a location adjacent the approach to the office park is most appropriate. 9. The scale (size) of the sign should relate to, the scale of' the project and to the perspective differential from the street (distance to sign versus distance to buildings). T Staff Recommendations Approval, if and when Council action, approves ZOA 2-75, on condition that: be setback at least 10 feet from �� e off-ramp 1. Sign b s t t 1 f m h if that location is still desired. Page p - g 2 SdR 16-75 5 ( n b I Mir:,..,.,.,..,.,,.»..r,M.,i„-:.,,.a.,., . .. ,,.,..». .«,�,,.w...,.+u.....,.t..,.+Yx,,...J..«I.,..'..l.,.r..,.. .. ,._.,,.w-.k:.cs.o,6:_....�...c, :«:w::„�.24w.,:..<w il«-M.1.: ...:�knw..,»,,...,..,:..;�.,4w,.�,«..f.i..,., ..,:m•« .�-tiu«F.�NL...,,.-. «,.,k.r.. t1, . 5C)g ....7 s I t , 1 , u .. .. . , , . . , . I ii ., ., . , . ,, . r ' Rt , . 1i 4.; June 2, 1975 John. T. Flattery f • Lincoln Property Co � 555 116th Ave. N. �E. I ,� it Sui e 202 ' Bellevue, Washington 9800 I i n Dear John: I I understand,that you are aware the Design Review Board's HI approval or denial on June 10 will have no force or effect i until and unless the City Council passes the ordinance amending Ch. 18.40.070 of the Tigard Municipal Code. The } '°.,.o hearing for that ordinance revision, due to a jammed agenda, is not until, the 23rd of June. Assuming Design Review Board 1 , approval, it would still then be June 28 before a. sign permit , could be issued. Sincerely, ,i , ra d M. Powell, Assoc: Aid �I Associate Planner J,MPtps 1 I 1 i I I i I i I i I 1 a � f , • Vr 1 1 J . I. '1_ h �, ,,. C,LI LL�I ) • i I 0 i I • • May 28, 1975 I , Mr. Ray Bartel • '11' The Design Revie w'. Board Tigard Planning Commission 12420 S. W. Main Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 ,Dear, Mr. Bartel: , Lincoln Property Company has finalized the architectural plans for the project sign at the Lincolnwood Office Park, 72nd and Hampton Street, Tigard, Oregon. You will find enclosed a color rendering and mechanical plan showing the design and location for the proposed sign. It will be 9' high and 16' wide and will be placed between Buildings 7100 and 7150 facing Highway 217 and the 72nd Avenue exit. The vertical support posts will,be 2' wide and 9' high; made of masonry rock and will be buff white in color to conform with the architectural scheme established for the Lincolnwood Office Park. The lettering will be designed from redwood material and each letter will be approximately 15" high. The wording "Office Park" will be painted black. The horizontal trim pieces will run 12' between the masonry support posts and will be made from 2" x 4" redwood material. The color scheme, the types of materials used and the location of the sign is such that it will complement the project but will not be offensive to passersby on the freeway or access roads. We feel that • the sign lends itself nicely to, the aesthetic values of the Community; , and at the same time is in keeping with the overall design of the project. Very truly yours I I r hINCLINCOLN PRO P)RT" Y COMPANY y' rp yI w d'ohn T. rlatte Partner +I a7TF.b1 H TON �rllc��rd,��'��e�'r� ��eo E.W bM� s'rR��-r SUITE , LU`r'�11i� 'T'`IGA�iD�f7FI�Cf,hJ E3' �2G-3 /�pMA coca BCI-SCJZt7 11 :0 ' • r -,'-----,-4,-.., :Y tY- ,.-.- �•n-.gyp°...-_ t i. TY- _ _ - - - Y-1 - _ -. -..mss-.. ->-' « 4f •- '' —'-44 `v _ - _ �t`: �'� y .z¢_ �.1-_c�'_ _ - - - ��_.F S' ..�5 Tai._ -o.� 'C. :c'dT- �.. - .ti' ,x• 'f-.. �,x_. .-'., ms`s: > _ ,.., ,._ c'Y r �5�. _ _�.{:.. L �A � .'� ^.'3b. .,w i=r wo { --. -� G.., -.. 1...,. .� `i,�[¢-Y,3c.'f.. _. TiP - :A.-::--,•_-,`�1'tr"s. `T�s-"�_,Yr - _o� - _ 4a a'�- A ��:u., ...y_.. 'n. -..._�,. . .>�i_. e¢ -;...,.. _. .-. �• -- __ s. , { ^,. 1 �i-".. - 'a °3`":' .- � ,��'�t.'�'-._ma t=:r.• " • +--_ .;,Y.,,�_ _.., ,_ -2.,_t. �,.�..tti �. ...,.. .. s » _-v..a. _ t '`'` .1-'.� = s:b:s i. .--• Z .1 - T~c. a.,, *i'-. • - - max. . .....', •.,._��_. �;��_ ..�._-�3'-,'*,_.. .!"�,r t•=.--_ ...,.sn-. ,� ,,_ , _ _.._�.:� _r'S �;_— ' sr .._S�'_- sw_r• +.`3?_ y��-.-.-t=": 7r _ = -_z .__. . _.-,- 3. -c. . . .d,t}'"'a.':` .K:'.z.._t-S .«.._ g.^-�.. ._ w��_ ] i.�-R.�`-- "H_--`4_ - _ - 1.; - "�' _ _ . _ aF:..s. .z..,zs"'e:< _..._.+,.._-.•„: ,f`�.. ._..�_:„.:,.� _ ,ti„-'k .. - ,.. rr-.:^ __ s _ c� - -;?' - �:s'-'d° - '`Sim •�,,�""itr �ro.- ���.. s--..E ., __.ti -t•.-3 a:ti, -�'+vr.. 3m wt.._�y _ V,,.....-..:. .-.-..._. 4.-,-,._--•-•.. s _ .i. ��;' tr _ •4 'ih.✓ _ �”. _ Jt.A r>+ 1_r.-,..-..n ._:f ___� ,?,. � _ ..._E .. `11 _+A s. _ .. s �, � ._ . Y �'- � =. .�.`. -" >�:, �_' _fti .$fir i :�Tx <�. . '-', -., ,=hr-,- , _ -,-t Y ;..� _.- <,. s- .. - .Z - -'S!< S:c '¢°�' ,A.. :- zalc•._ <-F- + ,,StaF- + _,-.,. „a.:-... ,..-, --�E .. ��,,..,,�� _•T',. _ k_ _ _ s,. _,. � _.: _ ° .�Y .�• '� _+Y' `!.Ye 3•�^T' _ ,te=e��.t', �� _ t`�'�j-� -�'.-'„!+ �a ._ia�' ..-_.. . ..? t�'F, .."Y... t fT s:- •S.f��'s..'1e 4 ._. � ,rr°__ .< a[��• ._� < .«,� --1.... a ..-...- ._. Ttt.. _.�{ s lx . . :«.,,3' _: 1' _ �_ ' .IT�i.a'a �. - `jf,.� i, ...�'��'�.:-' �2. � ,.-.-. ,r —.• Y.. 5..» . ._ .._ i �' .,,. - ,n.. ;x„ '-4 -ma 4 c`,'" + '`•- . - -. -._, .. _ -mss _ . _ _ .. ,. .... _ �r � . -_ _-f- ._ 6' ,. .. - •.^<._ ..t,•-. _:3�' {�'-.-:, -a .,.��' ,., _._ , ,"z _�.„_- '-.r.�'s.r. L....• -..R.. s .... -. ,,�VT _.. z ._.•_'•.:�:, z . �'-•'z=t"- .Z s_ �r`,i't'.,scr,°.�. , ,_ s r"s ..,.^-,-, �,..,.-_.. -... _-. •;. -._. _..a. _ - , „ .. ... ,.r,_ .� ,- . _ S, ^z .a ,za. ,.r.. .t #5+.-`s +..1�' - _v _ . _ . .x _ +. T,..- . ...t>, _ ' _,a. .� . _. -�...,r. ,. -,� .A<.d.,- .� a+ - .,a-^�-3^ • .: ut°€-• - ,r- �- - "v s@�' 4 a a >t. ..< _ ..c.., ,_..yt5.�x�.-_. er-'F..+.: ..._ r' , ..r. . .. : � 4-.. -_"�'-^.'j}�•F� � -A..LF�.�Fx'. ..,.t �'(� ,.• ? -..._„ .r_t. .,r.,- ;-.:, ,,, : .: �^T , , T:S.RY4. '..2.1 t>.cam .`..,a ti{ -.F•.-!+'G,.•ry --f t,*- 3 _.a.. r"s '" �'e.,-, _ r�'3�`Y t a. � _s .. - j` it'''..",,,,,.._ 4-F+••r _ _ _ - ?:'Y�L' "�,_ - _:,.�.,.�., _ ,tt _. ,� . _.-� - -; _. ,F -.a r ,c..+,�.. - -_'_>..� - <�+` ;cY�. .t+ �a�, t�`>y's' ,.:._`,� aF...., �k�'x• zx>. _ ��.-.,.. -��_,. . ... _ # _ t'.!'' - r :�. "'L -.-. .rte 5..�, -. ,.- ..' `,_. n'`Ez.<. ti4�- �,:a�^ ,,;.' `t�t"<„ >�... -�'X¢ �'�`�3'r. �_,-`x-1 y �.•.*rx_, 9=,:.�,�.,.�,.-7us,--.r._z»�Yi-e -r.-�-s.c+��ss� -ts ,..t,•.•..` .,c -_ • �".:. `"`Ft.s. ,,,,yy "y� _ , � �r,..� �. > _ . w-z _ - ..��s'�>�i,�= =,.+- �'��`+!.�_ '��-'s-'��''�`'�`ss_ ��'�?+z��'�� =''4�`fi�r _`�`�''r"ts�'4�sx''+tiw:`:r'°-„' _ __: si _ - {Q a.1, � a - - - - - - - x- _ -.Y. '; k i w i I ' � :10.m. • - „. - 4_1_ ..„ ...„ , . ______, - �'�>�+_`,3` _ sue,, K - ! - -1 : _ , _�- • - - t -- -l -- - _ - __ $--- ,"� _-n-+ +t----z•''cra s r-`• -.., .- : ._ -an i_' Z�-. :v i.:'�>x•••' ,L' % E 0 r te_ _ _ _: is • _ - -_-- - �j,.f .�j`' _ --t - '� ¢.RAY' - _ - +�s�b' 'S ,1 if _ 4g ' I 4 • OFFICE PAIIS _____,,,....._....„ .._ _ ; S s; _ } r 71 4.--,,,,,-*-Z E -I -- -- - l - - #, T*-^r zs -. -ri„ �",;c =i,; ;Xs. A-4 _ -s'"`.a = -..s.-�es�A _� 41Ztj - r f•,k ��''ti �^t- 'cr- 7; _. �' L_ . _ y -57 ,. . w�yyc.tt�� - t = - - - -'t. t- - - Y- ^�f'rYr ri• '' Tl�r fi^ ••-- -- - - fir. 3 ;t ' _ - -s t., f. $ EXCWSIVE Le-ASL,NG .MANAGiNC-i AGeiv-r r. _° ._,z:t- - _- -_• J a fit. 'rt-[E . Nt., _2 E ti. ti -- �s` r. c i ;r,si iOtt _ —JS',;Y?k.Sf ; �:4 ' r ' _ s .+•^'tnt a" '. t s,s' , '. c`>ss t ...7,...,-- : t_ r r.a �aa fi -tsK• -�,f '-k,.-5.-,4::4-,_ ,4A a t -R ' - 'C^ - - - - r •t., - i 1 i ., _ -ku-'� s _k-� 5 f x '$`°at"., ;, . ,7:::::',..' � - _ i -} • "'`-yy i.G".c.•YT x..>.o>.5.,''-'-`-Y i- rK '(�. L '-_Y-", _ r •x ..c � »s ,. ..Y.e. ,..- 1'v.^ -s:a�'.s�, ,.s'i',e ;,r its f - '-^+; •-`7•-• rev- _ -c?,>. E,- s., +,-''» - - - - •' ?,..,3. -a+.- _ _..... , ,.,_X_.,�_ »?; .. x � �i . _-r..-._.-.s't•. .' .rte". .a.S.z5 cyK�:,'w-'Ysa °•sue-..:< _mu•,.,x•z-,•..... r �,a«.-.,-t n,.. ,.y3 `,� t.. . . ti �". x. . .7-,'err., r,... ,.�- -. t r'�'•--a�""r.,:K. ?r "rr,- a `f of .-,-_. �,-'s,..�;£_..+,: .. .... a �..>, ":_ r . -.: .,..�- .... .> k�-s.-,z :: .,. �,: -�_,....,. ���� �. `d .._ ;'F� �r. -z :s---t-.,.Sn "� <� _-,L.. Vie...-,t... f'?.s. ,. ,. 66 xa,..r _ .. _.'._-i-�i.^.h,'s.,x.,. -f_ . -.? .s_c r "�?;��- ..?.,..� '1 �a � ��.� •l�Ye��' - ±_ _..,+>+.._€ .Y.- ..Y.._....� ,+mow ., _. _ i ::fi __ .. f... i?+„ � . .++�".y f�. ,+F .A_. � _.... 3-`� ��� -t`..�R� `ata3- -�y`_?��S1''Z•i""_,Y_ �y?y'�^���.T - - -. , _.. ,. . .. �.,.. �. -. .rt-., _._ .._._ ,.3.-::' ,. ,t<"-Z ,... ..R, '+^,•.�, '�•„. + _3,"i,,._tea-.�. �� a� �_ -?E- ->�'•, � _-F--,.. 'ter., >.5ikr _ __.. _ + ,.>. . Wit_... _ ->r_...._. ..,,..=.... �,.:.... -„ti... - ...� f..x. .. -_ .-.-. 5 3- tT. ,:,.,�.Y ,+.£:,.� �,� •�--� '?'_.; zi:. . , ,. fir r?ie- _e.« ,. --t„_._.. _ fir ,..... .. .c_a:.• -- `tr'. a+-'.^ K :. s'^s'*. '+r_ _.-s-i ... ,,_,�s?.: .>... �." ,.. _,.4.€.sue- _ � ,.--u . - ---iL3_ ,..._ s ..��...e�� ,,.y;v g � ���,�-� ... _.is, '-t.. .-. ... . �a"-s" � �': 4..��x �-�Y�`-i3. ,_ r, : _., Y:,,...,, ... .._ + - .,_ .. .._ _ � ._ _ ea, t�.` ..€.._�?.�e .#'•*`,?�T•""� �i fir:;.. 7=s, •?-•-.-54,-e, � fie" �'t 7f-. �. .._f:11..-..__.. _ _v .., _. ,, .. _:t__. - mss' t•pr•s '..";"t:1,--,,,T. ,..v, :..^e.-4 s ... r • .jai _`,-. ,, _> t-. ...,L,_ t . . ,.:.. __. --1.,..x t, -. -. _..,. �.. . __ �_• "a• _. _ o_ >:-^ _ . s•,n -�-.a:; -_� -,•s �z <s:'tf.. ve'..�• 'Z_ ��., t - r t,_ e . _ .i ise a . [z r a,i_�r_y, + rY _--ti, hasu `. _.�._„.�- .r -- - __.. _ r -a-mss �" , ,. . ,.. _...,. -.z�:.•_ .<7_ -: _� .-..a z ..,..._.� J ,r>Qa,.3 _ - -;:�_ .:..�_ �s• .. �:��f» - 'r...r.- _,.- ., .,. >. _,.. - _ �-.: .>- -_ xL. - - :_- -. _. 7 -33_`,..f- ;`:,-,..ia-, .,ay...4 ".=+ ..a. -.JI'z1:�1, .:-4.a, . -+xs,,. _ y:-. _.. m.,-:. ....,,,. _....,. ��.____.._. •- -...a, �..._ ...-�.:,. � �F �--3 >.,y,�... ..-�. ,�.n, �t-.`7t_.�-� .., ..s--, cam• .si �,�� -- - .C�•��'- 'a: :�" =�'-.�,. ... t .« . . .k �: _.. ,.'`_.'�" � ..F'� _• • - _t:..a. �..-'4 .�,-._>s, z u•-'c.,.. �F - wry - .a..--. _..•oR;f-3:'�;icYtc'�a.. .,,.� ..i.,j„ , x F+. r..__.i-.e. :,t _., <. T - ._.. .., .ia.� ,. ...+".c.*.._ ,. . r ±F __. g? '<_- .°'.:s ,?t ¢_r,< :!�,F::�t -- S. :&, +"'.{s,-', J.` _ c 4« < r+r s .v._ s .v. _ _... . , . _.w a _ . -,__ t.__,_ iC� S+a-i✓•�-�. � �`r� �.S,.Tr F. ��-�_*_+ �-v._.•'_�#� �,r°v�.�.';�'- ic .^Y -- •. -•,>. ........--��,tF"";,.ff, . �...Y.r _ .,.��.--a.-.s-r<._- + s, _.:.. .% � '.Ar-_ '- ,. ,.. ......-� � <. :..;s� ,,:.�`�.uu _ r,•" ,�i. s-'>Fa x� a'-z.. �—'y_ _ ._-.e ' >s•v .. i. .-,.•"✓-_ �_..,,�.. wx ,... ;,. _. "�.s-... e A e -3 E473-,.r -$� :r- - ,- •:.x -.k "7�- . .... ._ .'a-_}-. -._.. _ ...... ,c..,t....._._ -.. _.�_.- ._ _.-.�.._ : ,..Er _'x.,!E`-::M*��,.-� -'.z�.•,..e._ '_t .2a-: 5 �K4, ,€;..£.��'�:a`3.'µ �• +� ..may,-- .�., ,.r;.t _ - >. _..._ ., ...,.�.,. _ ... _-. .�.. _,..--..-.�..v .q-, =�n_:-,.r..��3... --mac � - .:�.. rT- �-"L .c . ,r��>y -�,�.{_ �=." :.-:4`� -- ,.._ __._- -. ,.,.,,.e•. ..i. c-_ ....-.•.{.>.. -...r_4 > ..._. {r...t._-. _-.. -, < ^-. _._.. -r- v'}_ _= -.. Wt.F.- 1Y - .YYk+`[/�?..g._ y? .Y ----''- _ ., -.:7-. ___.r....,,_-�. .-.r_._.,�r ...,.-.. s..- ,_. ..:�.,5�.__.?-,>r'�,?� -��tr-.. _.,. - t _e>..s-.--ri-:,�.>. � ._ _.._ s.r,=.i.. - ,s_`r �''-•"� �� e3 ..� - a t- sue- -....'"3?sFt-�v-.=.'f"z___r'�.:. .....:. .-::rti..._ .-:�-�!'a...-_._,_ :.._.i...__ _�s_ ,� -�..,.,.?. L'.,..� '--tom. -:.�F�`.`"ii_✓ w..� n--.,r -.�. _-.�^s_5�.3... r--t?'.�„_;l^�� - iE.;: _aroma. h •.f • w„,1.,....,,:1 a,..,....,......,..,. u...... ....+.... ... M I�µ)•._,..a ..,, ,..w,„.»,-......,.a t:M._,...r'�.�.df .,...�: ..,.._......k.....1.�=...,_.., i.....J .:+. ..vr• .■ .�.+.lt..,,.._.r�:.i_.,....r wd..1.44 ...,.....,.+«, I:.:w.N..., 4r•{.,t..,:d II I h L� I I I I May 28, 1975 I r Mr. Ray Bartel f• The Design Review Board r Tigard Planning Commission 12420 S. W. Main Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 I , Dear Mr. Bartel: I I it Lincoln Property Company has finalized the architectural plans for the project sign at the Lincolnwood Office Park, 72nd and Hampton Street, Tigard, Oregon. You will find enclosed a color rendering and mechanical plan showing the design and location for the proposed sign. It will be 9' high and 16' wide and will be placed between Buildings 7100 and 7150 facing Highway 217 and the 72nd Avenue exit. The vertical support posts • will be 2' wide and 9' high; made of masonry rock and will be buff white in color to conform with the architectural scheme established k / for the Lincolnwood Office Park. The lettering will be designed from redwood material and each letter will be approximately 15” high. The wording "Office Park" will be painted black. The horizontal trim pieces will run 12' between the masonry support posts and will be made' from 2" x 4" redwood material. ood mat The 'color Scheme, the types of materials used and the location of the • sign is sudh that it will complement the project but will not be offensive to passersby on the freeway or access roads, We feel that • the sigh lends itself nicely to the aesthetic values of the community, and at the same time iS in keeping with the overall design of the project. Very truly yours, LINCOLN PROP RTY COMPANY d in T. Flatter Partner ,'{ I i I I oneP 'oTT ga Pe ny 71d0 s,W I lAMPTbN 0111Ett UIT 110 TIQAIati;orlEGdN s'78Msi AP A CIC liE doh +sOo-5d5L't I , . ' kk ' i. r !'i, "' 1, _ • � ,.., is.....,,, ,..a..«, JA.,,.,....:,C';.,._...,,:a!,"..„. ».,«xew...,..,..«....1 lj�.I:.....r.e:W�l:„...».,...,..�..,.,:i t«.1w,.......„r„lr,..N,i,..x.+.,r,x x,.x..„,...u.:,'.,I.v,i-n.H x—,,..,«wJa.e•.,,H..u...._..,.n....._.s.1..e.S..,."...-+:.,w,.«.«:,.I..,-:... .dSt,�,.,A w..Jlu»x,.......,'Nwu.,l a:tY..e..f'.w.�k..l«,,.—...w,e.. A..;i.-...a:.:•..'u i 1 r ' May 27, 1975 Mr. nichard Bolen ,. Planning Director i I I I I I City of Tigard 12420 S.W. Main Street Tigard, Oregon ?7 2 2 3 RE: Application for Sign Review by the Design Review Board; Lincolnwood Office Park under C-P Zone Sign ordinance a � Dear Dick: I Enclosed herewith is a rendering of our proposed sign and a plot plan showing the proposed location. The sign has been designed to architecturally blend with the office buildings thiJough the - A§ use of materials similar to those used for the construction of the buildings. '' It is, our intent to treat the sign as an insti- tutional/nameplate marker to identify "Lincolnwood" as an office park. The sign is 42 square feet and has been located along the 72nd Street and Highway 217 off-ramp, as ,this is the focal point of the complex for the majority of persons approaching the pro= ject. Z request that this application be placed on the Design Review Board' s agenda for the June 10th meeting. I will plan to attend that meeting and answer any questions the Board may have after they have r reviewed this submission. Very truly yours, LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY John T. Flattery JTF/imh I , ' I Enc. - I ' 1 I CdYgl7 ad pR g ry g®mp �' bbs i1 h AVE.N. ELATE 2 be b2LLbVUb;vAaH,b bbtn ek�sd cctJb Ebb 4b5-E b b x;r 7 t a • 1 1 hf la i .,� „., v...,. ,�.. � is I � .e.rq,Mwrn ,`'L�t wMihen� VI ,• ' (1 I!ri, . ,,,, . ,noik, ro- .. 1...,...._ a .i IrM M wi v ��,M 'r,•MieMk4WnN'?u!o'IM.+Y�KfW/N'iw � � itl :+Mwl, .YYIMJi 1 F6 R we.w,urwwx+wa..•u..._.. ,'- .\"``a 3 I tr. , tr k Co 1yayp�/y.� /��_y/'f�j,','�yrv,. 1 1 .`ll 1, ,,k- III.M. RCE�� , °' " 'x�`,0 A uni(ue business center Borbara Bushell i Project Mcneac r I� i �» S` K' y }r" 1 7 1 7it"9U a W Mf�tilil(.)rIt auli 11 /, CIC1ttIda w !�1CJJy 67C b77 i 1 i i I 1. 1\ 7 • w 4 11 a.. i r r I r I � r.... e 11 I s*'MO 517 ' 'M ' I I r ,./ / j1 r NNE r !^ • • • > , • 1 1 Ott x i il, •. •.' ji:- . . — ' 1, . 1 I y ,n a d!S 1 440 „ . � t f .. Y • 1 , —y � 1 .a•IMl9 I / NI P''`e r� u111U1 dII u p I r .� 1 lijilillit. , fi r S, 6 '.� r ir'i 1Y� r - ' ITV. ,! tip -- . •4-*,,,,,.. "..,mor...irbijifip,,,,,,.. '•INIIIIIINUNISNII/ONINPiall. ,,,,,, rlii,...1 lipti,140„;,.., iG+y1 4 I t 1 /' "� 4"";, .a. AIk` 9. 1 �o ,`�• p €,i,, 1;;. r III � 1 � ! I � LI fir, , +fir, if 4, _ ►, ,f v /,yam II !`''a -- ,. II �' ,(1 , �I`' J 4Y ��u_� M•�t f'� _I.i�l�� M�a,�l i , J�' \ + � t �.'.. iii. ifi III 1� , . ...,04 .... 1 Iv ! I_______ . ,r.,, __ „. ” , . , �(". �� • I ,,.'r` *���.•••••••///// ! •.//I// ! , ///// 1� \; T, • ill? ,;',....0" 1,`7J 1 1'J , f �, �• ilk' 41 ..��+'•' �•0) / i i� y • M E 1 .7 . ...„.......„,...,„,„......, � � y1 L'11 i�I.�' . . ' 1.l RI 'IM , 0_ i I 1 # , , r a r.moriewomat• , 1' ')4:,*S ,- �7J•1�`M1�' -11 C JI`�/4:4.* yr'W I`1 ,it ' ' .. ,r St; LY� .`ji1".ar,sr. " ,,,. ', w,f' .f4,/� `. r Hu I � a I 0 lv • • • ,D WINO DA711t Y•- .^ice '� IM ;'' YfdVt;t S�.jOf1f15tOf r' ewlrlat+stI , a.► A1rblt•c" A.IM„Rc. ',,�I,,,�,i' .• ,.�,► f.hYw.1 Crar 9079 9W 7Yq llr:r�.>o Nf1„ hnWl4w1 071011....109 91/-3^9411 t4 1 0 /101iCT No.. ..v.r- '-i., ,.�71�"LTIy'-, cHie NO/Ct:_ tl7—.---. • • ■ ., n,.,-rn.. ...,r. '•1- -°-.n�.M, r..,�y...y.-;=rn ', .- -. � »nyK;,,...y..�,• .y.�,..r.'r�r-"m'^',^^gxrwn�:^mr�r,ir lt"r.r..i...i f.•e.� -�I��, .,...-,. _�,n.. - , r. -. ,.,.. ,. , ..�.«. _ ...i • . s - 0 r- j -.-:-- — - - _- -- _ - x- _.� -NI,et SST"� V CAD milA( / . / Cz_Wc-X.t--7"-AT BA-53. --_-"vi,-'07-44_ .a_XPe.s-, E:L'i - fit- R/4.647- _ • - . - . 1 '_CCII_ ,11._. 0. % Y!/ '^^• - L !O,Q.A✓C N -_/j�l;/ _ _ _ /_ 7 . _ _ • . -_ :I _. - - _- --_ _.:.- " -- - - I _i:"- • - }r . ' ' _ -- :_'. : -_- __ „_ - 7 - :___ - -, - --- - - - _ .- - - t_' 1: - /// _ ztu _- X.): - - - - . _. - . _ :-__ ------ - : _ - _ - : - - -'__ 10- i - :-____-. ___"' ____' _ - -__1_I:-7: - :,:_ _r__-:,i-_-_._ 1 __ ,..:: -...____:' -- . r*• - . ' _ 4 t() -_ • - __ --_ - - --1-_ _ - "-- .,..-� ___ - �_�___...._.... � - _ ter...--.��s-...-.r.._..-....+.___.Y_.. - _ P-. 7 71::-:.;N . _ - - _- _ _ - _ - _ _ -- - - - • - - r�r: 1 . - _ a . ' s _ - .. _ • lea i` NOWLEASING "t . . A - 4,- .,.., + . : , , - ,-- Y' -- - - a, { �._ - ,sue y.,,..5:•_a....`-- _ - ` il� — _ - -- - - tti - g - _ �- _ --_ - - _„-��'�``.'.Y ." :—'z a <_ t �...-.— 4,1.i*s •-s�:",`r rr'1! _.... = - - ---- Q4ti - - - - -- - - .� 5 '�i ,P ti r. S S. f fib* z �S ,r,i ,��."."r'�.' - - �i l -r OFFICE PA K --_ - A tiF }F 1•_.��_ s,, Excu,SrVE LZASEN6 MANAGING/GeEUT t Y� �• __ -- E rb X ...! _ - _ 4• 7Q � 221 -1700 -Z; _____„...,„,_-__ - _--' ., o € 1 : CC<a u t/►.mot.. i_ 4.' �,.. , 1' SST✓ -t, . --- • • • r,Ere ly � rt �4 +k 1'4 tY*,,,'5 ,r ,t, , aft 7 i '1't p bq hi r r 'L C tia - x wJ. }}w a ggy� �, 'r 1 1"'I tk ! yt 4 e\,�jwilrrli 4�axi • •! ' •�NAa,u'' 1r7Mr'i.,.vr «jm.r+Me,' '....n u...ki '', I�tl r..,..«....4. t!,4.,,",trr l'�,1,, r, 1� ! i :r eyaa :rta�t • 1' 14�'c,,,,,,,,,i�irir,,• r, d ( g� , 'ta« t �V•v4,rli,� 4,y Ir w,r, ,,�4jrc IL , «� nr" y�r.Y r t r r +`1 ,: • a, �,^ sii,r 1a 44 t i t-i I.Yi{rl, • �' '>Mn+r,S yl1,(�7 4A,1 wl'r I '1,'''.';',a 4 ,T �y. '' d btu ,t t 1Aw. 4. r,t xl it rM ,rf' ryt, ,'•fj`i Yt'r• N t t''� }t rr r�flal,u rIH{ ?4� 1�,k ` ` ftl Y }(fir 4 n"",- �r,��1 1 . �„ µ(,( •VNtyi Ir0��� IAN:::::;,,l',•,,,..,:,;';';:fFN , • }nt Y l t� / a;+,�.. •�f• , kY A #r t rr•4,,,"4••r Y E•utt t. N r� d n , Hti 1 Ar A i Y * t s{yyy '^ skt ft a' �•! Hy,r 4 x{l�w� .' bw t' 4t d �lew a 1 I r i r' a,, . e 0.k '1 r,Q t,ttp11tp X r I�,IA V �, kJs It t d.�lJ n rt1 w irks Kr ..„•••,;;,,i t wa•B,It k "...<1:Z.'4•',,1 A3 ,f A �tyaY f YGaf r Vb "V r.pr r kN*:aI �) �rl�rnln t e���l t li r V - tf y4,. !'I1r, !, I�''i! Ili i �w xrlA4�t INS 1 'a�'f It r:;;;,:..•;•,•N' ,•,•..darA . N 11 �^ fd t yP1 e f fa l,r tF.l:4-_'�t��+.C ,tip ' r i1,,l,,t t r,h`1't�'•''i ,"�'� t, k7L3., drytl 1, 10'4;4� w J p;• A t5 t,*i{�' ;r''it z,• •6114','"';',i 1 y ilt ryA}i kr j 4i �k Air r 1'f y. .C�1iVl!C 1i'� I. �. r r x rIN �`J4 .„'1 5q if �; ,,,'I 1 •,,II {ISts{ l*' «� (' ` Y,111 ' rM 1 t)1 ,,.rli^t 1 4. `] ,AI iII t r. t Df l !t u 4 x+,�f1■I lak ,yi: k I, tt,"',•••'•,!1,,, I,I �1 f IeCIMM �k r4 iPftFr�l ,,,,.,:'''',02:::',.';',...°,,,,°,,•','”' k if tr'';',.A:,°;'•,,°;•'4';;'"'"�Yr ,.4 , - .'11{•41 , re • t 1+ f u r, dli,,,..1„.)f �Jf it .. q .1K t' ',..1'..:'';',-L 1tlr ;' ate '�,�IM1,, + 1I, 41e��a '',,,,•,,,,,i,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,;,,,),6',' {ti4.t ';,.•,, ,/ r,1 I,r1 if1'r r, r^ 91 4').,4,'...;,,''i'',4‘• ` •{ I n Y t it I tlr- ''Qp' Lt,'t•t, e 1i,ilC Y �! �11°`t !{Pn ,, h t nJ • I w t C' l '� 5 T +F. �. Ir' i n 1 4 y i ' 6 Y L,r 1,,. t1 a rt - . f} . gw,,ihy `5i ,,r 5 i• t Ip� �•I, -If t] {ld�t �n44 1�'�1*{ x:1 {��J/Q'Y rl y l,'t�!'t'r,A'm�^` .' ,jtltj 7) { 1 rt P Y, M r 1r r�i t. .4,-,„:''''''''';',''''' I,.Ep { �41 , Pt °7 1A51ii ' 1h ¢r I�r 1 I,t to •txi.i4 Y fiM k+ t t,iwr q r aq r15 ,ysMira k. y1 r 1 �,. °tfl,J1H o-, -Y��ri,i,j ” i (!I , il�1p i r}Hry''F' r" I T _ a..0 �'H3,�f4a�^tyi# fail >N,�.e ,Er•' a° r v , v i w 1 1 r}tt • �'r,' t'1 `',, ''.r' � 4t �� , -_sw pl Y 1. �;,^}t•r Q' ' `.r r1/ ti A H r )��r • �,&7,7 tY fti�lr �a4 5! L„ a Ir 4L--1,,,',,,!1'•'4";•;.•;.,,,,,•,,t et "{1� t 'ti iCt lH.r 1 i :1r f v w' , �i 1 t ,' i l',ia 1 tl �.�r1,t. I. {J }r J r li 1!" frt (( • tG "h � �iHxY Nit 4, x r r r;F 4k 1 n k•AW'fi 1"' r N., w a 'S k p,,,, ;1,r • ok �ro'1:,. k�x13NKK4 pt+ tA 71 tJ i, v�l srp 3{ �llk• k t ,1Y 1 h +�� ' , t1 }�vl,w d+ t l ti 6ta fu�Yr �' RR lt rt t wX n t tw.? 1 'fd X13{LZ C. f J 1i s I} F 4.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,..,,:•,,,,,�. t k{q,n� ,: ,,� d r r ' d Ip 4,1�?IV t 1' le ,",,,,:,';',"*.;;""';'''',11,;";lY�' ll ,,,,.„4 mLx• (� I r xl' � 4 T",r I.r 1 I. t a ya L„�+q N11 q a 1 -r u's'�tdI i y�,ti"r y i w r t k • ,, �11'4w t r i t +1 L 5 . J 1 r tli i rr},.w 1 i,i i" ,. a r•r� rt �41 r�� +,1 t1 V r., ,.,24>„ i.. N14 r EY1r ai• Ac W{ rT " 1*ay4l t 1i+,41 (: r y ti, tiw "1,,;t t iy a Sri 1, e. 3 t it,al}It r; i Id�'+.,,V ^ YF e 11 i r "� t" t x,1 .t��r,,l4 r u!d (/ ti ai hrY'i??,p tr r.A 1, Y ' A t Y e ,> 1, l'' t X , ! 'NI 6•..;',-?•Nw , fmJA 1l Y �! Y1td 5 n f S !r,'°i 1�:'Ni15 E ,' 4•1',,i,,•,;',',J q' �• t�,lir a •■ Yill L5r 1r, tFt � r� i- rary i 1 ,�h ri 1',n dw14 U i 1 t r xi,t r, ••,..!I ',k, • aJ:•1'.'',,, t , , , it,'4,;': }I ,�w t rle? ? x t 1'!i ! h IN 3r i i;,',1, i I" " '4;4.,:',.0';4";,!;A'‘',",•,;ttitf +r I,I !r� ' ix r ti{ "wi� ,*' {, i*i' y '1 ,'R.t ,',,,, 1 r } I I 1 ',5■• 4 W, f r r {f w r r 1 a fa ' r' ° if:'' I I • '''', i + '',14.:,.: I ; I i St d w 1 1 L.'4' 'c1' 9 r rop w t n '' ''i` l l T a I t•Sk,i w k �r t r 4/, 7 �i ' t,r 1• I 'c,4,:,} )` K ' r S 1 ' , C b; r I{{ r• IF w Ott• r , a 1 {i•p"r t,Ili ! 4 7 r';I 1rA 1, li' i d w Y w . 1 t. 4 1, ' I r0.f i p k}w •,••4.';'xi,i71 { r i 4"/,'4 .4.,,,...,,,,,4,,A„,‘1 r t ' L„� r J k;I a.. •f r y V T 4r,4a,� r . .....• • pW p ,,,Lt .1 'N ar.v F l i 4 11 111 r {"+y xt' • 1 1 •fr 1 fi1 j• ,',N 1 ��i ,'/4 �Y t I. ,,tA1kkK I ,,,,,,.WCKY,♦i, ,.14..0,,,,17,,,,.YI,,,I,tI, I j ; , Aµ;` (kr c ,40'1.4.4n lr t x 1,k n ', 1 4,•-• • w 1.••',',1i,,'',:',''''••;_','•w kN I • + tii i e L.