Loading...
SDR5-74 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. i z I \ ,'. k ', ;, I . SITE DEVELOPMENT PLA•IU 6 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD °i: .' StaN -s Report I I mai,eh 1974 , . ( Agenda Item 4. 2 I , • ' SOR 5-74 (international ernatiohai Kings Tabl© ` te Devero meht pawn review 1 r , corner r of the •. ` Highway.� . �.ntersectioh of 'S.IW. 69th Av enue aid Pacific The • , site comprises 1.01 acres and is located in a C-3 General Commercial zone. (Tax Map lSl 36 AD, Tax Lot 4300 j ' Staff F .ndin 1. The City Council, on February 25, 1973, took action to ' change existing zoning on the subject site to C .3,_: ,• General Commercial, said approval subject to the • ,., following conditions . `I That all improvements con eructed on the above described property shall be subject to design' approval l' . of the Design Review Board of the City ' s, ordinancesl!, ',' That the topography site and s.urf a ce drainage shall ' ' b e s o c o n s 4 y.a c t e d a s to direct torm w a t er a w a y f r om f' adjoining residential areas. , , . I u • That at the request of the City of Tigard at any time s that a local improvement district shall be proposed fur the purpose of improving o S.W. 69th Street in accordance with the City' s street standards, the owner of the above described lands shall be obligated to ` support the formation of such local improvement assessment district for such purpose. • Thai the laurel hedge n • • g present upon the said preen uses shall, not be w mo„. d in connection with development of said site except upon prior approval of the Site Plan Rev,iew Board. P p� p provisions s of Chapters s ' �" 18,60 (TMC) Off-Street Park a,n�and Leadih and 18. 64 (TMC) ' !; : r Access d ' E , Tess with ho following exceptions h I 'L • Section 1S 60, 100 staves and e � rr provided that any common boundary along which this ' parking iLJ allowed between a 'residential' zone and any .'other zone is screened by a fence obscurring the site of normal f adjacent pedestrian n and vehicular traffic, the erection of which shall be they responsibility ofl the ownership in the non-reS dentia1 zone. is Said property ' s , h I i • ..,In ..J{' Y.. ,Yp . -.f fw. ..... ,,4w...,. ."..............xr+rM•-r.rn.•�.+.... • •r.!„ ` �' Mme,. .. u.,. .",,,..,.. .-...«» .., .. :.w-.r,.. ..-:,,,r M,-..MU.'.u.:..r..,-J1.1-.M,+:«r.,tw..-1 r,..w:.;.,..+--f�..;.».. a..a.»„+..n,n .«..,e r, ,...H,�,,tr,n.•..,r1.v.,w,lsSA r,,,,, ,I I fp r northerly boundary is adjacent a single family ly r.esden- tial zone. a, m Section 16.60.180 slates ',parking spaces along the boundleries of e parking lot shall be provided with a bumper rail or a curb at least four inches high. . . , . Section 18. 60.210 states, "artificial lighting which may be provided shall be deflected so as not to ° , shine directly into adjoining dwellings or other types ^ of living units and so as not to create a hazard to the public use of any road or street. 3, Section 18. 56.060 (TIC) states the following standards for landscaping and screening within C--3, General Commercial zone: . Tree and shrub plantings within parking areas shall, be provided and maintained at approximately seventy o . feet on center each way. • All areas not occupied by paved roadways, structures, ; p: or walkways shall he landscaped. A minimum of the front ten feet from the street right-of-way shall' be • landscaped. di • Not less than ten percent of the total lct area shall , be landscaped. tvp • Installation and maintenance of landscaping shall comply `. with the requirements of Section 18. 68. 050 (4) and (5) . (Ord. T2-35, Chapter 3 (part) , 1972: Ord. 70-32 chapter 105-3. 2, 1970) p' q The above requirements have been met • 4 Miscellaneous Staff Comments • The City' s standard for a, maximum cu f b cut is 30 feet. } The applicant' s submittal indicates a 40 foot curb cut on S.W. Pacific Highway. .I . The applicant has not submitted a topographic map of property boundaries. This information is necessary to „ determine adequacy of drainage plans ands conformance I, with setback requirements. w •� Additional� trace along on 0 the eastern Property boundary would he desirable. 1 . .` „v , A s�to obsr�rr a q fence a nd heavy plantings along the northerl y Property '”.founder Y ma y provi de a better long 11 term • term screening solution than retaining the existing laurel hedge. • Page 2 - Planning Ooard Staff Report - march 19, 1974 ,• w r w • „ .Nm. xr 7r. ` ,Yi r., r ri.. s .... i. Y p ' 1 i.j O Raised walks better. d�define seseparation between between _vn r on-site tI, , ,• . • auto and pedestrian movements, I ; e Screening of roof top mechanical devises should be considered. Y • ir tt i 1 111 i Pao e Board staff tt'apor.b - iviot,0 h 9 1974 Y , -W^�tiwp 4WxrnYS •aFAFWrni:.F:T i r