SDR24-74 POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
•
U ,,IA U i a« ; 4 m +r ''',,,I,,, k ��f 'i ',J, : .d. �1�1 f„' 1 ''.l.,J,• 1' ...wa.l•�.4'''' '•-^-'.4J4.'4+ Afl�i u..44'.2 1,4 4',.L4$'''4 4'..4.lwtra.4..,44h44.a.d„y5:,..44.n✓l.w�..a.m�r..r..l. .i.ntro.w.».n04.4. ..,`,
, '9'
,, . '
��
I 400 COUNTRY 'KITCH 'SHA ;4YS 'PIZZA as ti
Site Deve Lopment,',Review',(SUR 124-'-;74�).•t 1
:S W �f �S
I.
+l 1 r
1,. 1
• r
.
i
•
•
• •
I
r •
•
,
,
i
. '1 I
'• r
NI
P,
• 1
•
1• •
.1
,11.0. i
ti
l
•
• i
4,1
•
1'
•
Y
t
^
1
i
1
h
N"
l ' 1 ' - ul 1 1'
i �.1, _ 4kt
I
•
,
•
, ,.o.wai., .wu:.4,:twd4wa. w��:.+i..:r.1.+....N.,;�.cx:w.,n-.Vj qY rrt.. .. .. ......!-.,.-w+..�«r..as,vts•n.YArL.c
ii s a ,•� w
a
. , ' /l/J/
I
, ►
O
Y y
27110 .: Stone Air. ' '
•
,
'
Ad .o (Cow by � c / ha *
;ear :''n :04004104 '
O that else some
amendodh l0 ' t s subz*ttod4. 4 therefore en , ht ' .' •
you' hold. oft actin cy On ..tw !letter ofHOdtober. 24 until t of '
cyan na Mi. loo ; ' and whoovb olw, o needed!ed oa 40$004
- • ' h i c o io t : n% you, ' ' '
fY 1P'RRr'�N'yQp�' � I li
I I
•
�q
•
N
1
I •
I
I I
I
I
{{
r 110•
' I, ' \ . '.
s
•
•
October
a 1975 '
Bob 0. Duncan Landscaping
27120 So E. Stone R.c,n
Gre8h s Oregon 97030
Reference: File No. SDR 24-74 (Country Kitchen/Shakey's)
Dear 'Mr. Duncan
After reviewing 'your revised landecape plan for the Shaky's-
f
Cou try Kitchen project, we find that plan acceptable as stu . •
mitt d, with the following additiahe and/or changes:
` 1. Areas adjacent public right way on 'both 69th and
• Pacific Highway shall be planted i .'a hardy, low
groundoover such as jury,. Wilton, or Jun. . RarHarbor in
place of the ,$ivyto shown on the plan.
• 2. A specimen size shade tree (your choice of species) shall .
• be included in the landscape island at the north end of
the. diagonal parking channel el adjacent the east side of
•
the Country Kitchen building.
•
As I have indicated to you in my office, we are attemptin,g to con-, �
tact the contractor, Mr. Olson, concer .n , the deficiency of curbing
yN street qr} , rats on SW 69th, so it may be we ll to coordinate
•
work on the SW 69th side with him.
M Sincerely,
Jerald Powell, Assoc'., A
Associate, I+J{ r .,.
JAP:pt
cc: file
uilding Of is a
rry ' I
' a
._...„._. ,.,. ,..M,., ,.,.,.„.,.,ww..:.,.w,h.,n,aw ,..,,. ». . ,..._........ .„. µ . . ,.. r.,. ..U.,,.,e „. S .,':.',G .'I.x.,'� ♦ +.:ri"
•
•
44=tri/e, coe zeK7fe
TIGARD SITE DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
Staff Report
C
December 5, 1974
SDR 24-74
Applicant iH
Country Kitchen, Inc. of Portland and
Shakey's Pizza
Pro er.-..p_.._tLyIEvolved.
The subject property is located at the intersection of Pacific
Highway and 69th Street, on the northeast corner, adjacent the
existing Texaco station. (tax map 1S1 36AD, tax lot 4300) .
• Staff Findings
, .
1. The applicants propose locating two restaurants on the site
which has been divided into separate parcels according to
the Planning Commission approval of November 19, 1974.
2. Access to the property is provided by one entrance from
Pacific Highway located in the middle of the property and
between the two proposed restaurants. Additional access
( and the only egress is provided from 69th Street at two
points.
•
3. Both buildings are proposed to be located at the minimum TS
• distance from the Pacific Highway frontage which is 10 ft.
This 10 ft. setback is required to be landscaped and is
shown as such with the exception of the Country Kitchen
• Restaurant which shows a small portion of its 10 ft. being
used as a walkway.
4. The submitted landscape plan shows considerable landscaping
• along Pacific Highway and 69th within the public right-of-
, way area. This is due to the fact that, for instance, on the
Pacific Highway side, there is a 20 ft. strip of land between
the existing curb and the applicant' s property line.
•, 5. There is one location in the parking area, in front of the
Country Kitchen Restaurant, where the required tree plant-
ings at 70 ft. on center are not indicated on the submitted !
• plan.
6. The Pacific Highway frontage presently has the necessary storm
• drainage and curbing. 69th Street has only a pad surface
with open drainage on its margins. When approving the
partitioning of this parcel, the Planning Commission required ' -
a piped storm system along 1-;he applicant's 69th Street front- i
, -
•
•
•
i, ..k.n.z,..:r.,,,..x+u,,.r..u:`.c.url;+e..;✓.ax».ar.tit....,,,. ....,,., + r i u ri .1 L�/
age. The staff is concerned that without curbing to U
, channel surface runoff water into the piped storm system,
A.
that erosion will take ' place on this frontage which does have
a slope
Staff Recommendation
y M
Staff recommends approval of the submitted site development
plan with the following recommended changes:
A. that the arkin' area located in. front of the Country
p g
Kitchen site have a planter area located somewhere along
Y
its 104 ft. length
B. that the Country Kitchen building be moved 4 ft. back from
the Pacific Highway frontage to allow a minimum .of
land-
scaping between the walkway and* the property line
ft. would not eliminate space
• s.
This 4 i e gray parking s a.
C. that the, frontage on 69th St. be improved to include 'a
cur b and a feathering of asphalt from the cur b
into the
existing road surface to provide for surface water runoff
a
•
SDR Staff Report 12/5/74 - page 2
1
^,•, ,,.,... - . ..r... ...+...- ._..x_4.4,..... I W� ..... ..4N. ...r.,J.a.A...0.l.......,.:............. .. ..... i 41.....,,x 1 ._.... . 1.w.4 ..h..fn.¢.+.....- rww.,.-..n-.e-;,1-......:arn4-L4....%.+.w..r.N.....J...l.n,:..:..11.+t.l.-«'alLw4.n.:,:cJ!«4UU.i5'..i Nx„n.r u....MAi.AnI4ti44 .- O
•
MINUTES
. TIGARD SITE DEVELOPMENT & DESIGN REVIEW BOARD •
- December 5, 1974
Twality Junior High School - lecture room 1
14650, S. W. 97th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon
k
1. CALL TO ORDER
A. The meeting was called to order at 4:45 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
A. Members present: Edin, McMonagle, Whittaker, Chairman Bartel,
City Planner Bolen and newly-appointed member Wakem observed
1I
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Whittaker pointed out that on the initial motion for approval
of the City shop building's site development plan, that Edin
voted no rather than Cook. The minutes were then approved
as corrected.
•
4. SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW
4.1 SDR 24-74 (Country Kitchen-Shakey's Pizza)
A proposal to locate a Country Kitchen Restaurant and Shakey's
Pizza Parlor on two parcels located at the corner of 69th and
Pacific Highway,,
A. Staff Findings
1. Bolen presented the findings noting that the plan did
conform to the city's landscape requirements with two
minor exceptions and pointed out the inadequacy of the
existing condition of 69th Street.
B. Applicant's Presentation
1. Carl Anderson of Caldwell-Banker stated that Mr. Bolen.
had adequately explained their proposal and that he
himself and Bob Martin, the engineer, as well as milt
Olson, the general contractor, were present for any
questions the board might have.
C. Staff Recommendation
1. Bolen recommended approval of the submitted site develop)
ment plan with the following recommended (changes
a) that the parking area located in front of the
Country Kitchen site have a planter located somewhere
•
I ,
r
•
•
I. iii f
i
along its 100 ft. length, preferably at the end
b)
that the frontage on 6
r nta t
e e n 9 h be improved to P '
include ud.,
g 1 a
curb and feathering of asphalt from the curb under
the existing road to provide for surface water
runoff
c that the access oint from
p from Pacific Highway should
intersect at a 90 degree angle 9
D. Discussion and Action
•
i 1.`�
Bartel responded concerning, the staff finding that ithe Ar.
walkway in front of the Country Kitchen is within the
# � setback area. He said that he found no problem with
:,.
i. fid) , this and the board concurred that the build..Ing location '
was appropriate.
2. Whittaker moved to approve the submitted site develop-
4 ment plan according to the following conditions
a) that the area shown for refuse storage be screened
' on 4 sides
b) that the sidewalk serving the Country Kitchen
restaurant extend to the end of the 100 ft. strip
•
of parking spaces and that a planter be provided
, where the last parking space is shown to coincide
k with the sweet gum and tam junipers stipulated ,0 p P
for the other planters. In addition, the planter
in the middle of the length of parking in front
of Shakey's to be moved to the last designated
r y
�� parking spot adjacent Shakey's.
c) that the entrance drive from. Pacific Highway 'inter- N
sect the highway at a 90 degree angle.
d) that 69th St.
be improved by providing asphalt l'�
ft. from centerline of the road with an extruded
curb on the margin.
3. Edin seconded and the motion passed by unanimous vote
of the commission
5. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
A. Staff Bindings
1. Bolen distributed the submitted plan
showing i
n g the
proposed se
d
building design and also a photograph of 'la building
recently constructed in Eugene ,using the same materials
and colors
f
l B. Discussion and Action i
•
OR Minutes w:: December 5 I� 1974 page •r..
r
. ur..L,i.,S.w .,4ilf..✓.md•. .L:r.4«J. :.Li.. .F�lrrR o-t.iNrr I.KiMrla,rn r.Fr..rFt1 w.(.tw•Irt.... 4:]JU1nt VR. ..d4. .:Rn ..«Aur a....✓-...+.•rnrsr nr.4rEL4%1u.4J.rA
P
A 1
1 '.
1. The Board discussed the architecture of the Country i,
Kitchen building only as the Shakey;:s facility is
not seeking a building permit at this time Items fi `
discussed included the fact that the building faces
Pacific,but will b e a pp roached b y patrons parkin g
I{,
in the rear; the materials to be used; and the
character of the roof and location of mechanical
units. °
2. Whittaker move d to a pp rove the architectural plans with
the exception of the trash storage area shown on the
plans but which will not be used with this building r
n' ou vote
motion unanimous s
the moti xi a ea un
and passed b
: din 'seconded s
� p Y
of the members present.
esent.'
6 ADJOURNMENT I
4
J � T
A The meeting was adjourned at 5:45 .mo'
I
A. e 5
g J p.m.
4 ,
1
I , r
1
r t-
r 1
Itl c.i
1 .1
•
1
"DR'. Minutes �- December 5 1974 -w page
Gt;
•
• I' ..k.rsli..r.,.,r-n'wNu.Mh,rM.A. ml...:karin .-F.... ,h.,.rNu .i.... :+3,.:«l,•naf6..4.i«:Il.4r+,..4Aly-.rw4Un.ry "i,i.n.:.:LM.,;.4tPa ix'.W.,M.._>k+y+/-4..., n,4..d.utW14,'r4,h1 i
•
l . I •.
H.
r
L. The staff recommended a course of action for
approval. There, was some discussion among j
the Board members. Cook then moved to approve the �!
site plan as submitted subject to the following
conditions: ''
. That t the approved 1 and a ed P l n meet
,
. provisions of the Tigard and Municipal al Code.
That Section 18. 60. 180 Tigard Municipal
al C
ode
providing for bumper rails for curbs perimeters
parking lots be adhered to.
° inadequate size, spaces not meeting the
,y,,.. That all
Tigard Municipal Code requirements be sighed
compact car spaces. _ %
° That the applicant submit assurance from a
professional) landscape architect or horticulturist r'
or extension agent that all plant materials will
survive periods of drought. That the applicant
• submit a drainag '
e .P lan for the subject site,
said plan shall be subject to the approval of
the City Public Works Department. That the
parking space immediately west of the easterly
egress point for the subject site be designed
�
so as to not allow an auto to occupy a space .
closer than (3) three feet to the easterly access
drive. ,
1
Nickelson seconded the motion. The motion passed
by unanimous vote of all members presenta
r?„Y„0IGWd y�i't�4)41JAJ?Q l��� "bdl 14114��r �,4,x r rrt tglo l,,,r,v$4 N„2.,,,,,,,,,,,,, a a,,,.,,,,,,.ow t g{,,z t e tt.f rtl., yro�0 1 4,.� .ro og 4 4 a,,,A,k4IS� a ��... {e "
k
,.
F
' A request by Michael and Lucy Mayernik for Board
pp rov l of the removal ofa laurel hede on b roP ert
located on the northeast corner of S.W.' 69th Avenue
and Pacific Highway. Previous 7,one" change action required ,
' Board approval prior to removal pf subject hedge.
., (Tax Map 1S1 36AD, Tax Lot 4.300)
A.. The staff read the staff findings concerning subject
case. Members of the design review board than
discussed what would replace the hedge if the hedge
were removed.
B. The applicant, Lucy Mayernik, explained that the .
new property rs Weald probably pub up a new
�
riei owners
fence and landscaping to replace the hedge.
t '"
-
f C. Mickel son asked the applicant i a fenc e would d b
e
placed on the site u pon xemoval of the hedges
1
I
\ ' i
Page 3 • SDR' Minutes May 2, 1974 f
a
•
I .
• n f ..,...nlF in ....,.'t;{ .r .. -ttr,. ':M1 - ., .,N.r t.,r+e.. .. -_N... i.. i II i
•
•
.. D. Lucy Mayernik replied not at this time
would a fence be placed on the property boundary.
She stated that there was excavation equipment
on the site and that her contract with the
excavator included removal,, of the hedge.
McMonagle asked Mrs. Mayernik about the feeling of .
the adjacent property owner concerning the removal
of t he.
h
ed ge.
F. Mrs. Mayernik
stated
that the property er t
y owner would
be relieved to have the hedge removed.
G. McMonagle stated that he was not opposed to
having the hedge removed, but felt the adjacent
property owner has a reason to expect P ect theta fence
will be ".suit there within a reasonable period of
time.
H. Lucy Mayernik stated that the applicant was not
concerned over the timing of the removal of the
hedge as related to future, development on the ,
site.
r I. Cook stated that he felt the development of the
property would be before the design review board
very shortly.
J. Mickelson then moved that the applicant' s request
be granted. Eaton seconded and the motion passed
by unanimous vote of ' those' present. The d'
than moved for c S minute recess.
x Wear ., ;,00..00.ftrr 111mmnozoo. 41ammeg k'St ig tog„:V' ,)pos4 tW°`'+' ' zesot„ t t" "d + wtmi r
3. 2 SDR 7-74 (Columbia. Pool and Roc, Co.
A request b y
Columbia Pool ad Recreation Company
for review of a retail swimming pool sales -facility
on a. site located at 13015 S. W., , Pacific Highway and
comprising . 56 acres. The site is located in a 6.3,
General Commercial zone. (Tax Map 231 2BD, TaX Lot
2900 and 3000) .
A. Staff read findings as described in the staff report
of May 2, 1974. Staff also described existing
conditions around the site by referring to a map
attached to the staff reort. Staff described a
bparking scheme the applicant p
rin. his site into conformance with the Cityts
of`f'-street parking requirements. r
0. Bartell expressed his opinion that he would, ..
prefer landscaping against the f erine surrounding the .
pool' area, rather than redwood slats, in order to
achieve site obstruct do from adjacent properties
on the highway •
Page 4 � SbF Minute s es L 5-2-74
•
•
r ..
. ,
4k
ii
•
..✓;.w«.F..
� I ,. ...-. xew&+�.nrtJ. Y.1.41N:.:µ++4..,:.;r �._.t....'t�t./- LJ.:f.rFM .44 ne„ - � ��.. ��r� ___ I ..,,. . .. ��
u k M �Y 1 f, t. .
i . .
5' 11 1— "" , •
Cam' II.
v
.I
G 1yt 4
qax
`t
I
A �w. w 1974. I
1 ,1 I , r
'� • � �� �I� �
1.�1O ':1 A r,Ott i Y /a Jl;XN 1 r{/(,:!,17"1',i):,./,74, Y , L
I
rtroirt . ��` l .1arl. + dl. l ��.'��*« 1, 1,' �`i, 1.rEora: ;,�
whi;oh ohuts the rear porgy of our property. The existing hedge ..
is old over�;ro ru oni. ti.a ,st nt olr ,r:up pro' e o ou* ' ',
, I
property,, 1'
'e 'Peel that ,11. lain r oderX. 'e .r)e 1-c.v:il%r..,i,n.tr, this 1
d for looks. d r our r aMyar1
I ]
,�w ; this is 11T,'oVI.C.,od '1hhrl , our r�ooert he ,rest0a'oc `l
:;o t. or� :�"3. r; ��r,� _ �.(Al if' * r �r a°i� + ". � ^ �� w' � e resu t
of the r e,tiolrsl,1 of said hei
I
..»�y.lt ::w,w.—..,.,7wow7'1..,t-- r..4.d .,«.w.h 4—r.,.w«
.r' s,1 „ p,,,,,;=• ,d, ,',,..,,....«-..
1 �,
..,,,,,..1.1 6 i 6,'••1‘,::/ ‘ ', 4c 7,4-k y {
„N A
I
d
,
I
\ . , , ,
d�
I,
i
1
I
i 1
i
V
,
I
I I
I i
iw
l
f w.rk .r.....w..... ........s... ..r..,..rl.r,l r.......»..ten r_i.._..o r.,c..oar.a..e«u.1.«..:,t'._xe..,+.+.i.�.4..;..11....,i.L114 k..+......,.1,�n...+Y.x+_N..,-.,..,.._..I.a...x ..... a...w....,-u»..urar..-...,,�.na.N.x:...uwz.u........L;..:R}c',.. i..I.�L�SP.H[tn$i:.«.3_«='R.,.".:.wx .e�., a ..-g> ...'.� ,. •;.+.,«.' .r.._.w..W.umt'i1�.i
, . i , , , iettop . ' .
' j'''' ' ''' ' ' ' '''' 1 ''''''.0''''''''''''' .' ,
•
I
1
. " . „ , i "/: ' LIJiii.1.6.1) , I— , 0,, Lf ) ' ;'' ,I. • '' .
i
1 , . . . ,
t ' , . , r
L , . . , , .
. . . .. , , . , , . . . . . .
. . ,
. ,. , ,, , . .. . , . .
... , . .
,. , ,
, . .
,,. ..
, . ,,, .
n. .
. ., .. , . ,
. .,, .
• . .
..
. , , ,. 1 „ , . . . . .
, . .
. . .
. . ,
. , 1 , , .
. . . ,
. .
, . ,,
. , . ,.
. . ,, ,
. .
,,
. , . . .
. , ,
. ..
. , . .„. , . . . . .
. , ,
..
. .
, , .
. .
.. .
. . . . , , . . , .
. . . .,
, . ,, .
. . .
. . , ,
, ,
, .. .._. . .
. .
.,
, . .. ... .. .
., , ,. .. . . , ,
. , .. , 7.3. ,. . ,., .. . . , . ,, . . , ....,. .",. , ., . ,
.,,
. . ..
, ,,,. , . .
. •
. . „..
. . . , . •. .• ., ; , .1 .
. , ... ;
. ,
, .,..., .,. .
•. .. ,may. . ,
. . : .
, .
. . .
, . „ ,
. . .
. . , . ,
. . . . .„ , , . . , .
, . . . , . , . .
. .
, . , , ., . • •
. ,. , . . .. .
. • . , . , . .
. ,• . . , ..
. , ,
. . .
, , . .
• ,1 . .
. , . ,
,., . .
.. ., . . . .
. • , .
• .
. . . •
. . .
. .
. .
• .
. . .
, . . ;
.. • . , .
. , . .
. , . .. .
. . . . .
. . . .
• , . , . . . ,
. .., , . •
. . .. . . . . .
is.„„,,
Ili •
, . • .
• . . .”,
1
1
1
i
,
°„a
•
• ................a..-a...r.,...........--,.,..,.,..4f.,.......,..wa,..._....,.....a....r_..r.,4yr,..■.ia1...,w...:aw.r4.,.....f.,.f..»,._.r.x.F ..,. f .arm.x.-n �._ -w a.r_ r \,
.w.�sx..:G+ _:•WJI�.�...wifw..+.�..-:,.,.Y. f.» «r... Lass•te:�s.t,v/.. ..,,....:.aa:.: x;r::4,.,..+1-..r:.+l„ti:.W:r_.,_twn..r...,_..,.a,xW,uV=C.:...ta;,«.u:h.:sinewy.:rr:a;,4.cr.rlx.4.:,.R;1.ra.ak:w.u,nn r.tnw.�atiiy*..rnwUyiV4kW.'..
•
•
•
■
•
•
M 5
A .. ;wr<�w..w.>.ar.
. I
4'
tl
pr
Ld
tt
I 0 1 r
r .
[/�(,:T.'0}yr/�✓alb,_,,:
Y
0
a , C(.>.-32 eo
•
f I I
r
+ E
II, 1
•
•f
111 �.
I ,
}
1
,.
■
P
■
I
a
1
r
1 0 �I yr. r....xrW.•m.wa,anlvM!" A
a,
! Y